Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2004-04-01 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL AND CONFERENCE CENTER AUTHORITY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' SPECIAL JOINT MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 1, 2004 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM 313 ARROYO DRIVE Cassette Tape No. 1 1. Call to Order: 5:45 p.m. 2. Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers Fernekes*, Garbarino** and Gonzalez, Vice Mayor Green and Mayor Matsumoto* Authority Commissioners da Cunha, Metz, Noftsger and Rosaia, and Chairman Dworetzky; Ex-officio members: Mike Wilson and Laurie Masetti Absent: Commissioner Herbert *Also member of the Conference Center Authority **Councilman Garbarino arrived at 5:50 p.m. Staff Present: City Manager Wilson, City Attorney Mattas, Assistant City Managers Nagel and Van Duyn, Conference Center Executive Director O'Toole, Finance Director Steele Others Present: Emily Fancher/San Mateo County Times and Nat Friedland/Exam iner-Independent 3. Public Comments: None Study Session: Discussion/Direction regarding South San Francisco Convention Facility/ Hotel Development Options City Manager Wilson gave a brief synopsis of Council's direction given at the joint session, June 3, 2003. Mayor Matsumoto questioned City Attorney Mattas' opinion related to the financing option of a developintg a convention center hotel by using a tax-exempt non-profit corporation approach. In reference to state law, City Attorney Mattas stated that a legitimate public purpose exists to proceed with this type of action and it is reasonable. Staff report and visual presentation given by Conference Center Executive Director O'Toole and Finance Director Jim Steele. Councilman Fernekes stated his support and concerns for the project. He discussed the possibility that the State may take more of the City's redevelopment funds if the Local Taxpayer and Public Safety Protection Act initiative is not approved by the voters in November. He also felt that if Measure A isn't approved, cities will have to designate more funds toward transportation projects. He proposed going forward with the land study for the Oyster Poinl area, as it is justified, but he could not support money being spent on the feasibility study until after the November election. Assistant: City Manager Van Duyn estimated the cost of the land study at $100,000. Councilman Garbarino agreed with Councilman Fernekes and urged caution until the result of the November election is known. Councilman Green discussed the purpose of the land study, which staff explained will provide information on alternatives for the future development of the, 56 acres, including ancillary uses and infrastructure. Authority Chair Dworetzky suggested the preliminary work 'begin and to not lose the opportunity of the low interest rate environment by waiting until after the November election. He contended that the updated hotel scenarios and potential costs might be helpful in positioning 'the City/Authority. Councilman Gonzalez questioned the risks involved and what studies other than the land study, can be undertaken at this point. Director O'Toole stated that work is currently at a standstill and the update to the feasibility study and construction costs are needed to move forward. Mayor Matsumoto asked that she be provided with information on what types of business are being turned away due to the size of the center. She further ,questioned the strategy to build both structures (hotel and convention center) concurrently, which staff stated would need to occur at an estimated cost of $110+ million. Further discussion of the conference center's history, transient occupancy tax ($2.50 hotel room tax), current center users, and phasing the additional feasibility studies ensued. Councilman Gonzalez stated his optimism that the economy will recover and suggested a portion of the feasibility study be started. Mayor Matsumoto stated support for going forward with the: additional analysis, as long as it did not commit the City. Councilman Green asked if the current center will stay in existence if a convention center is built and staff indicated that it is unknown and a financial feasibility study will look at that option. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRiL 1, 2004 MINUTES PAGE 2 In response to Councilman Gonzalez's question regarding the land study, staff indicated that the study would take three to four months to complete. Authority member Metz's asked if a dollar amount can be placed on the business that is lost at the conference center and Director O'Toole stated that numbers have been provided in monthly reports, but more detailed information can be included. Mayor Matsumoto reiterated her support for completing the more detailed studies. Councilman Fernekes reiterated his concerns, and staff indicated that over $100,000 has been spent to date:. City Manager Wilson recommended that a land use study go forward; that Conference Center staff prepare the necessary RFP document--at staff level; that City staff contact King Ventures and San Mateo County Harbor District to discuss their status/direction at Oyster Point, and that the only money being spent on the', project will be invested irt the land use study. Chair Dworetzky polled the Authority to direct Conference Center staff to prepare the necessary RFP document for the Authority to review, at no cost. Authority Commissioners da Cunha, Metz, Noftsger and Rosaia concurred; Ex-Officio Masetti stated she is a non-voting member; Councilman Fernekes concurred; Mayor Matsumoto concurred, with reluctance. Mayor Matsumoto polled the Council to direct staff to come back to Council with the request to retain a consultant for the Oyster Point master plan. Councilmembers concurred. 5. Adjournment Being no further business, Chairman Dworetzky adjourned [he Conference Center Authority meeting at 7:30 p.m. Being no further business, Mayor Matsumoto adjourned the City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: Sy'~/via M. Payne, City ~ierk City of South San Francisco Approved: 1 ~ Karyl ~atsumoto, Mayor City of South San Francisco SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 1, 2004 MINUTES PAGE 3