HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-07-28 e-packetAGENDA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 2004
7:00 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of
each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South
San Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment.
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER.
Thank you for your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Board action.
RAYMOND L. GREEN
Vice Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR.
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
MICHAEL A. WILSON
Executive Director
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Chair
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Boardmcmber
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY 5'ltE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of July 14, 2004
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of July 28, 2004
CLOSED SESSION
3. Pursuant to Govermnent Code section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to 314
Miller Avenue; Agency Negotiator: Redevelopment Agency Assistant Director Van
Duyn
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JULY 28, 2004
AGENDA PAGE 2
AGENDA
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 2004
7:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting
Council business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at
7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San
Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item,
please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the
City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public
comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for
investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more
comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your
name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO THREE
(3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation.
The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Council action.
RAYMOND L. GREEN
Vice Mayor
RICHARD A GARBARINO, SR.
Councilman
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
City Treasurer
MICHAEL A. WILSON
City Manager
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Mayor
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Councilman
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Councilman
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
City Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
City Attorney
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS
· Project Read's Learning Wheels- Literacy Program Manager Holly Fulghum-Nutters and Literacy
Services Coordinator Pat Jarvis
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
· Announcements
· Committee Reports
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of July 14, 2004
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of July 28, 2004
3. Resolution approving Amendment No. 9 to the professional services agreement with Meyers
Nave Riback Silver and Wilson
4. Resolution authorizing acceptance of funds for the SSFPD/ABC training and enforcement grant
project in the amount of $30,000
5. Resolution amending master fee schedule to increase parking meter rates for certain areas within
Parking District #1 from $.25/hour to $.50/hour.
6. Acknowledgement of proclamation issued: Roberto Mendez, 7/23/04
PUBLIC HEARING
7. Resolution authorizing inclusion of two ballot measures related to the City's transient occupancy
tax and new commercial billboard tax on the next Municipal Election ballot in November, 2004,
authorizing the ballot title and statement, authorizing preparation of an impartial analysis by the
City Attorney and authorizing specified City Council members to prepare and sign a ballot
argument in favor of the proposed initiative measures
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
8. Report on neighborhood meetings related to BART parking restrictions
9. Resolution approving the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for FY 2004-05
COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 28, 2004
AGENDA PAGE 2
StaffReport
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 2004
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
City Attorney Contract Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 9 to the contract for legal
services with Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson. ..
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The last modification to the contract roi' City Attorney services was approved in 2002. The proposed
amendment to the contract modifies the existing contract in two respects. First, the contract would increase
the amount charged third parties for land use cost recovery matters and expand the category of entitlements
subject to cost recovery. Under the proposed amendment, cost recovery would be applicable to all (1) non-
residential projects that require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, development
agreement, zoning amendment, general plan amendment, specific plan or amendment thereto or other
discretionary approval applications, (2) all residential or mixed use projects containing four or more
residential units, and (3) any projects that require a mitigated negative declaration, environmental impact
report or an addendum to an environmental impact report. Second, the amendment would increase the
litigation rates by $10 per hour.
The City Manager and Assistant City Managers have reviewed the proposed amendment and support the
proposed changes.
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
"iK~ch, a~ ~. Wilso~_y a'~r~nager
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER AND
WILSON
WHEREAS, the City and Meyers-Nave entered into a professional services agreement in
March 1994; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement to mo.dify the compensation
provided to Meyers-Nave consistent with the attached Exhibit A.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco does hereby:
Approve Amendment No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement as
set forth in Exhibit A hereto;
Authorizes the City Manager to sign, on behalf of the City Amendment
No. 9.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of 2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
S:\Cun'ent Reso's\7-28-04meyersnave.contracl.reso. DOC
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO TIlE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
AND MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER AND WILSON
The City of Soutln San Francisco and Meyers-Nave do hereby agree as follows:
1. Section 4 "Compensation - Basic Services" is hereby amended to read as follows:
"City shall compensate Law Firm for all Basic Services described in Section 1
lnereof Thirty-Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($33,600) per month effective
July 1, 2002. In addition to Basic Services compensation, Law Firm shall also be
paid fol' cost recovery matters involving land use entitlements at tine rate of $250 per
hour for Principals, $225 per hour for Senior Associates and "Of Counsel"
attorneys, and $200 per hour for Junior Associates with the City's costs reimbursed
by the development applicant. For purposes of this section, cost recovery matters
shall include the following: 1) all non-residential projects requiring approval of a
conditional use permit, planned unit development, development agreement, zoning
amendment, general plan amendment, specific plan or amendment thereto or other
discretionary approval; 2) all residential or mixed use projects containing four (4) or
more residential units and/or those residential prQie6ts requesting an owner
participation agreement, disposition and development agreement, affordable
Inousing agreement or development agreement; and 3) any project requiring a
mitigated negative declaration, environmental impact report, or an addendm-n to an
environmental impact report.
In addition to the Basic Services compensation, Law Firm shall also be reimbursed
up to $26,835 on an annual basis for secretarial services provided in the South San
Francisco City Attorney's office and for photocopy costs incurred at the Law Firm's
Oakland office. City shall also reimburse Law Firm for the actual costs paid by
Law Firm for Westlaw and Lexus computer research services, messenger services
and document requests. In addition to the Basic Services, for redevelopment related
legal services in excess of 303 Inours during any City fiscal year, Law Firm shall be
paid $165 per hour for attorneys and $85 per hour for paralegal services."
The first sentence of Section 5 "Compensation - Special Services" is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"City shall compensate Law Firm for special services described in Section 2 hereof
and whicln are authorized by action of the City Council on an hourly basis at the rate
of $210 per lnour for shareholders and "Of Counsel" attorneys, $170 per hour for
junior for junior associates, $185 per hour roi' senior associates and $95 per hour for
paralegals."
Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Professional Services Agreement between the City and Meyers-Nave shall remain in
full force and effect for the term of this Agreement.
Date:
City of South San Francisco, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of California
By:
Michael A. Wilson, City Manager
Attest:
Sylvia Payne, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson
By:
Special Counsel Steven T. Mattas, Shareholder
StaffReport
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark Raffaelli, Chief of Police
BUDGET AMENDMENT - - SSFPD/ABC TRAINING AND
ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement with
the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to accept $30,000 in grant funding made
available through the Grant Assistance to Local Law Enforcement Agencies Project administered
by ABC and to amend the Police Department's current budget to accept the $30,000 the
Department will receive from ABC.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The Police Department applied for grant funding and was awarded $30,000 through the Grant Assistance
to Local Law Enforcement Agencies Project, which is administered by the Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC).
This funding will partly enable the Police Department to conduct special enforcement operations,
licensed vendor compliance and education programs, as well as offset associated operations costs,
equipment purchasing and travel expenses. The funding will partly cover the cost of 1) Personnel
services (salaries, overtime and benefits) of the Grant Program Administrator and the Detective assigned
to coordinate the special enforcement operations; 2) The hiring of civilian decoys during said operations;
3) The purchase of current state-of-the art surveillance equipment; and 4) Travel expenses and training
conferences registration fees for the Program Administrator and the assigned Detective.
The Police Department was a previous recipient of a similar ABC Grant Award in 1999 and experienced
great .~uccess with these enforcement activities. Approval of this resolution will allow such activities to
contifiue at minimal cost to the Police Department and the City of South San Francisco.
By: l~lark/Ratf~"7 Approved: Michael A. Wiiso
Chief of Polide City Manager
Attachments: Resolution
Agreement
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH THE
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL TO
ACCEPT $30,000 IN GRANT FUNDING MADE AVAILABLE
THROUGH THE GRANT ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES PROJECT ADMINISTERED BY ABC
AND AMENDING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S CURRENT
BUDGET TO ACCEPT THE $30,000 THE DEPARTMENT WILL
RECEIVE FROM ABC
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco desires to undertake a certain project
designated as the SSFPD/ABC Training and Enforcement Grant Project to be funded in part from
funds made available through the Grant Assistance to Local Law Enforcement Agencies Project
administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereafter referred to as ABC).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED as follow:
1)
The City Manager of the City of South San Francisco is authorized, on its
behalf to submit the attached proposal to ABC and is authorized to execute on
behalf of its City Council the attached contract, including any extensions or
amendments thereof and any subsequent contract with the State in relation
thereto.
2)
Any liability arising out of the performance of this contract, including civil
court actions for damages shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and
the authorizing agency. The State of California and ABC disclaim
responsibility for any such liability.
3) Grant funds received here under shall not be used to supplant expenditures
controlled by this body.
4) This award, to the extent of any positions are funded solely by this grant, said
positions shall be exempt from any citywide hiring freeze.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of ,2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
S:\Current Reso's\7-28-04ABC.res.doc
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STANDARD AGREEMENT
STD 213 (Rev 06/03)
AGREEMENT NUMBER
04G-LA21
REGISTRATION NUMBER
This Agreement is entered into between the State Agency and the Contractor named below:
STATE AGENCY'S NAME
Deoartment of AlcohOlic Beverage Control ~
CONTRACTOR'S NAME
Ci.ty of South San Francisco through the South San Francisco Police Department
2. The term of this
Agreement is: July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005
3. The maximum amount $
of this Agreement is: $30,000.00
4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits which are by this reference mad.
a part of the Agreement:
Exhibit A - Scope of Work/Project Narrative.
Exhibit B - Payment Provisions
Exhibit C - BUdget Estimate
Exhibit D* - General Terms and Conditions
Exhibit E - Special Terms and Conditions
7 pages
2 pages
1 page
GTC 304
1 page
Items shown with an Asterisk (*) are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this agreement as if attached hereto.
These documents can be viewed at www. ols. dgs. ca. gov/Stand+Language
IN WITNESS ~yItEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.
o~s / CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT NAME 7rotter than ar~ividual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.}
South Sa~Fran~ ~Poli~D~oartment
B Y(Authori n a .... ,' ~~~-- [ ~/~o~DATESIGNE~(D°n°~Pe)
P~TED N~D ~ 'LE ~ P~N SION~G ~ '
ADDRESS
33 Arroyo Drive, Suite C
South San Francisco, CA 94080
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AGENCY NAME
Department~of.Alcoholic Beveral~e Control
B Y (Auth°rized S ~~l~l~ ,t~~
PRINTED NAME AND TIT£~ bF.~RS6N SIdNII~6
Anthony M. Nieto, A's~tant Director, Administration
ADDRESS
3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA o;uaA
California Department of General
Services Use Only
DATE ~t~B~' t)pe)
Exempt per
Exhibit A
PROJECT NARRATIVE
PROPOSAL:
The South San Francisco Police Department requests $70,000 in funding from the Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control to implement strategies aimed at reducing problems with disruptive and
disorderly alcoholic beverage outlets.
I. BACKGROUND (20.Points):
A. History: The South San Francisco Police Department was one of the first police agencies on the
West Coast to embrace a Conm~unity Oriented Policing and Problem Solving (COPPS) philosophy.
The philosophy is demonstrated throughout the organization routinely as part of our daily policing
activities. One of the essential tenets of a COPPS philosophy is utilizing the resources of the police,
community-based organizations and service providers, as well as other governmental agencies, to
address community concerns. The expressed purpose is to empower the community via police and
community partnership, to accomplish quality of life improvement. This is a value statement that has
given the Police Department a high degree of credibility in South San Francisco, its nearby
communities and throughout San Mateo County.
South San Francisco has one of the most ethnically and culturally diverse populations in California,
with minority residents comprising more than 59% of the total population. The diverse population
includes both older established ethnic communities and new immigrants. It is widely acknowledged
that minority and youth populations are targets of the alcohol and tobacco industries.
B. Size & Location: South San Francisco covers nearly nine square miles, and is located in the
northern portion of San Mateo County. Daly City, Brisbane and Colma border the city to the north,
Pacifica to the west and San Francisco Bay to the east, and San Bruno and the San Francisco
International Airport (,part of which is physically located in South San Francisco) to the south.
C. Composition: The South San Francisco Police Department is composed ora Chief of Police,
Mark J. Raffaelli, two Captains, five Lieutenants, 10 Sergeants, 16 Corporals (including six
Detectives) and some 35 Police Officers, supported by 30+ civilian employees.
D. StrUcture: The Police Department has two divisio.ns, Operations and Services. The Criminal
Investigations Bureau (CIB) falls under the Operations Division, and is commanded by a CIB
Commander (Lieutenant), one CIB Supervisor (Sergeant) and six Detectives (all are Corporals). One
Corporal/Detective is assigned to monitor and address all issues associated with ABC licensed
establishments as an adjunct duty.
E. Primary Mission, Philosophy, Range and Focus of Service: "The Mission of the South San
Francisco Police Department is to provide service in the most professional, courteous, and efficient
manner possible."
The Services Division oversees the Community Relations Unit, which is composed of a Community
Relations Supervisor (Sergeant), a COPPS Coordinator (COrporal), and two School Liaison Officers
(One Corporal and one Officer). All four members of the Community Relations Unit teach Drug
Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) programs in the elementary and middle schools.
PROJECT NARRATIVE
The Po!ice Department sponsors a wide range of community programs: Citizen and Hispanic
Community Academies, Neighborhood Watch, Sober Graduation, School Traffic Safety Programs,
Police Explorer Post, North County Gang Task Force, Graffiti Abatement, Rights and Responsibilities
classes for community youth, and operates its own juvenile diversion program, dubbed Project NEAT
(NeighborhOod Enhancement Action Teams).
The Department also works closely with community organizations such as the Domestic Violence
Prevention Center, Families on Track, North Peninsula Family Alternatives and SSF Unidos.
F. Staffing, Supervision and Evaluation: Upon implementing our program, the South San Francisco
Police Department will devote approximately 20% of a Detective Sergeant and 20% of Detective's
workload via Special Operations, with the assistance of Police Officers and civilian decoys, to
accomplish the objectives of this grant.
The CIB Detective Sergeant will be the Project Director, and be responsible for reporting the progress
of the ABC Grant Program. The CIB Detective assigned to ABC concerns will coordinate all
attendant training Special Operations activities. The CIB Detective Sergeant will oversee the overall
operations, reporting and progress.
G. Level of Government: The City of South San Francisco is the applicant, and its Police
Department is the implementing agency for this ABC Grant Program.
II. PROBLEM STATEMENT (50 Points):
There are 183 alcoholic beverage establishments in the City of South San Francisco. Given the size of
our city, South San FranciSco has one of the highest concentrations of licenSees of any jurisdiction in
San Mateo County. Many 'of these establishments have been the focus of crime and incidents of public
nuisance.
According to the Office of Traffic Safety, South San Francisco ranks 46th out of 92 cities within the
same population size for alcohol-related accidents. We rank 31 st out of 92 cities for accidents where
drivers between the ages of 2'1-34 had been drinking. Additionally, the South San Francisco Police
Department reported 254 Driving Under the Influence arrests for 2002.
A. The Target Area: The City of South San Francisco
Demographics and Economics: According to U.S. Census 2000, South San Francisco has a
residential population of 60,552; and of those residents, 45,886 are aged 18 years or older, and some
14,666 are school-aged youths. In addition, a residential development currently under construction
will contain over 200 homes once completed. Two other residential projects will add approximately
500 homes when completed. A 10% increase of total population is projected over the next two years.
These additional 700 homes are projected to add nearly 1,600 school-aged youth to our community
within the next two years, which is an increase of nearly 11%.
South San Francisco is a diverse community, with the three largest ethnic groups as follows: 31.84%
Hispanic, 30.53% White and 28.59% Asian, according to U.S. Census 2000. The Association of Bay
2
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Area Governments (ABAG) reports that the mean household income for the year 2000 was estimated
at $61,764.
Significant Social Factors and Crime: In 2000, the City of South San Francisco experienced an
increase of nearly 12% in population from the 1990 Census. The increase in population created a
strain on public services and infrastructure, and contributed to an increase in crime.
The City of South San Francisco established a common link between violent actions and the
consumption of alcoholic beverages. As such, the Police Department focused on enforcement and
administrative actions against ABC licensees in our Downtown area, where ABC license saturation
had reached its apex.
B. Prosecution of Underage Purchases and Persons Who Furnish/Sell Alcoholic Beverages:
Our District Attorney prosecutes these cases with the cooperation of our City Attorney.':..
C. Information About ABC Establishments:
1.) Number of ABC licenses:
iOn-Sale: 113 i Off-Sale: 58 i Other: 12 I Total: 183
2.) Problems at ABC Licensed Establishments:
Sales of alcohol and tobacco products to minors
· Irresponsible sales of alcohol to obviously intoxicated persons
· Non-compliance of established conditions on license
· Public drunkenness and drinking in public
· Intoxicated individuals driving under the influence
· Homicide/Assaults/Assaults with Deadly Weapons
· Graffiti and loitering issues
· Lewd conduct
3.) Identifying Disruptive Establishments:
Identificatiofi Meth °dS ~e! Disruptive Esthblish~ents i
a. Records of calls for service to ABC establishments 1 attempted murder, 183 drug
(2003 Calls for Service to ABC Reporting Districts) possession/sales cases and 310 public
intoxication incidents in District #12 alone
b. Individual and Community complaints (1999-2000) 15.5% of licensees sold minors alcohol
c. Community Group Input
(Based on 2003 Planning Division Statistics)
d. DUI Reports
(2002 Office of Traffic Safety Statistics)
e. Arrests at ABC Licensed Premises (1999-2000)
2 public nuisances, 4 non-compliance of
conditional use permits
254 DUI arrests, 32 DUI related accidents,
No DUI fatalities
Two arrests, and 18 citations issued
f. Minor Decoy_OPerations Conducted (1999-2000) 84 Decoy operations conducted
g. Multi-agency Task Force Operations (2003) 3 Avoid the 23 Campaigns, 59 DUI arrests
3
PROJECT NARRATIVE
4.) Factors Contributing to the Problem:
Due to an increase for calls for service and other needs of the community, the South San
Francisco Police Department is forced to draw on other resources within the Police Department
to address such needs. In 1999, the Police Department was awarded an ABC GALE Grant,
using CIB personnel to coordinate and conduct minor decoy operations. Subsequently,
Business License, Use Permit and ABC License enforcement resulted in the closing of several
disruptive establishments in South San Francisco. The number of education and enforcement
actions increased over the last three years due to previous ABC grants. Alcohol-related
incidents have decreased; however, much more work is yet to be done. South San Francisco
and its Police Department would continue to benefit greatly, if we were awarded further grant
funding to supplement our current budget and staffing expenses, to further our goals of
education and enforcement.
5.) Factors Affected by the Problem:
The community has concerns about the area surrounding ABC licensed establishments. The
area rapidly attracts other criminal activity, when police oversight is lacking. Members of the
community seeks assistance from community leaders, who turn to the Planning Commission,
City Council and City Manager for answers as to why their neighborhoods suffer from such
issues. The properties surrounding the ABC licensed establishments have experienced
vacancies due to lack of confidence of business success.
D. Attempts to Solve the Problem:
The South San Francisco Police Department conducted 151 alcohol establishment visits from 1999 to
2000. During the first six months of the 1999 ABC GALE'grant (July 1999 through December 1999),
we conducted 76 alcohol establishment visits. For the duration of the grant, we conducted 84 decoy
operations, and some 15.5% of the licensees sold alcohol illegally to the decoy. The operations were
coordinated by South San Francisco Police Detective Daniel Wright, ABC Investigator Pat Deasy and
supported by South San Francisco Patrol Officers. Many of these operations had community members
in attendance while they were being conducted. Some 115 sworn Police Officers and Sergeants were
trained in updated laws and enforcement of ABC licensed establishments.
With continued funding from the ABC, the South San Francisco Police Department will have the
ability to address problems associated with licensed outlets. The goal is to continue and expand our
enforcement (to include "Shoulder Taps") and education as related to ABC establishments.
III. PROJECT OBJECTIVES (65 points):
As stated by the ABC, the primary goals of this grant program are "to a.) Achieve the goals and
objectives of the local enforcement agreements; b.) Establish close working relationships between
ABC district offices and the grant agencies; c.) Assist law enforcement efforts and target those licensed
outlets that cause alcohol-related crimes; d.) Develop management systems to ensure police reports are
sent systematically to ABC District Offices as required, and e.) Assist in the training of local law
enforcement."
4
PROJECT NARRATIVE
The S~uth San Francisco Police Department will meet these goals by achieving the following
objectives:
1. Continue to identify and target those alcohol outlets where criminal activities and other
problems occur.
2. To develop and implement a multi-agency task force concept involving ABC, South San
Francisco Police personnel, Code Enforcement, City Planning Dept. personnel and City
Attorney.
3. Provide updated training to Police Officers on ABC laws and tactics.
4. Conduct 12 ABC Enforcement Operations over the grant period.
5. Educate ABC licensees via LEAD, ROSTF and IMPACT presentations.
6. Make license revocation and closure recommendations to ABC regarding e~pecially
problematic establishments.
7. Build community awareness about problems at alcohol outlets via solutionS: Cieated :through
partnership between law enforcement, ABC personnel, news media and community .groups.
8. Update the public on the progress of the operation through Beat Notes NeWs. later, :community
meetings and at least two (2) media events ....
9. Conduct at least four (4) "Minor Decoy" operations in South San Francisco; by the pOlice
Department.
10. Conduct at least four (4) "Shoulder Tap" operations in South San Francisco, by the Police
Department.
11. Conduct at least four (4) "Cops in Shops" operations in South San Francisco, bythe Police
Department.
12. Compile results of our operations and report the findings to the ABC.
IV. METHOD OF PROCEDURE (45 points):
*Identify and target those alcohol *Participate with citizen action July 2004 Project
outlets where problems still occur, groups, City Planning Dept. and Director
City Attomey
*Develop a multi-disciplinary unit
to carry out the program *Establish a list outlets for
enforcement focus
*Create a LEAD handout for
licensees to train employees
*Provide updated training for *Train two (2) additional september project
Police Officers on ABC Detectives/Officers in ABC laws 2004 Director
enforcement laws and tactics
PROJECT NARRATIVE
~Conduct 12 enforcement *Conduct 4 minor decoy Ongoing Project -
operations operations, 4 "Cops in Shops" Director
and 4 "shoulder tap" operations
*Educate licensees about all CIB/Patrol
relevant laWs and ordinances *Conduct 2 LEAD training
sessions, 25 ROSTF and 25 Explorer
*Make license revocation and IMPACT visits at ABC outlets Decoys
closure recommendations to the
ABC re: Problem establishments ABC
Liaison
*Build community awareness *Write 2 Beat Note articles and Ongoing Project
about operations Press Releases informing Director
citizens of progress
*Update Public on program impact · DARE
*Make presentations at Officers
*Educate minors about the elementary, middle schools, and
illegalities of alcohol and its student government at secondary
dangers schools and Citizens Academies .
*Maintain efficient *Collect data associated with Quarterly Project
communication with ABC re: alcohol outlets Director
licensees
*Prepare report for ABC
*Maintain an ongoing evaluation
of the program *Prepare evaluation
* Submit Final Report and *Have the Chief of Police and July 2005 Project
Evaluation of the operation to the Budget Analyst approve Final Director
.
ABC Report
METHOD OF EVALUATION (20 Points):
A. Major Questions to be Answered: The following questions will be used to evaluate the
success of the program and its operation:
· Were the problem ABC licensed establishments identified and targeted? How?
· Was the training for Police Officers effective in reducing problems at the targeted outlets?
Explain.
· Did the building of community awareness about problems at licensed alcohol outlets have an
impact on the real or perceived problem? How?
· Did sharing resources with a neighboring law enforcement agency result in a reduction of man
hours utilized for ABC operations by each agency?
* How did the community perceive the program? g~,~at was used to evaluate [,ds.~
6
PROJECT NARRATIVE
· ,.Did communication with the local community groups increase?
· Was there an improvement in communication with the ABC?
· Were all goals achieved over the 12-month period? Explain.
B. Data To Be Used: To evaluate the success of our operation, the South San Francisco Police
Department will collect the following information:
· Data regarding the specific crimes occurring, time of day, and contributing factors surrounding
targeted alcohol outlets. The data will be collected prior to the operation implementation and
subsequently collected at least one month after the business was targeted.
· . Which alCohol outlets and what type of methods were implemented to address the'perceived
iss ? : .,
ues . · - '~".~-.'.
· How many hours were dedicated to the problem outlet and surrounding area,before' and after
the outlet was targeted? ,'.:, ;'-, :~-:~ ' :
· Acost analysis will then be conducted to ascertain if the program was effective.: :: ~.
C. Cost Effectiveness: For the program to prove cost effective, there must be:, ....'
· A savings in time spend by officers responding to the area outlets
· A reduction in arrests for illegal alcohol purchases and selling
· Improved conditions in the neighborhoods where alcohol outlets are located
VI. ABC LIAISON (25 points):
The South San Francisco Police Department has an established collaboration with ABC personnel to
train and register decoys for sting operations. We work together during investigations and appeals to
ensure the quality of service to the community. Our ongoing working relationship has fostered a
greater understanding of the resources each agency possesses. The South San Francisco Police
Department is undergoing a transition, with 31 new sworn personnel having been hired since the
completion of 1999-2000 ABC Gale Grant. The training of new officers in ABC legislation is
extremely important for the accomplishing of our .mutual goals and objectives.
VII. STATEMENT OF INTENT (20 points):
The South San Francisco Police is committed to programs that improve the quality of life in our
community. We are particularly eager to implement programs that increase the interaction between
neighborhoods, community groups, and youth oriented organizations. For the implementation of this
program, the City of South San Francisco will support the program by providing additional support
officers and buy money that may be attributed to the implementation of the program. Based on the
successful outcome of the operation in June of 2005, the program will be formally adopted as part of
the South San Francisco Police Department's problem oriented policing philosophy.
7
Exhibit B
Payment Provisions
1. INVOICING AND PAYMENT: Payments of approved reimbursable costs (per Budget Detail
attached) shall be in arrears and made via the State Controller's Office. Invoices shall be
submitted in duplicate on a monthly basis in a format specified by the State. Failure to submit
invoices and reports in the required format shall relieve the State from obligation of payment.
Payments will be in arrears, within 30 days of Department acceptance of Contractor
performance, pursuant to this agreement or receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever occurs
last. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit advance payments as authorized by Item 2100-101-
3036, Budget Act Statutes of 2004.
2. Revisions to the "Project Narrative" and the "Budget Estimate" may be requested by a change
request letter submitted by the Contractor. If approved by the State, the revised Grant Assistance
Program Narrative and/or Budget Estimate supersede and replace the previous documents
bearing those names. A contract amendment will be required to implement any such changes
with the exception that changes in a budget line item of expense not to exceed five percent (5%)
of the line item may be authorized without requiring a contract amendment if the total amount of
the contract remains unchanged.
3. Contractor agrees to refund to the State 'any amounts claimed for reimbursement and paid to
Contractor which are later disallowed by the. State after audit or inspection of records maintained
by the Contractor.
4. Only the costs displayed in the "Budget Estimate" are authorized for reimbursement by the State
to Contractor under this agreement. Any other costs incurred by Contractor in the performance
of this agreement are the sole responsibility of Contractor. '
5. Title shall be reserved to the State for any State-furnished or· State-financed Property authorized
by the State which is not fully consumed in the performance of this agreement. Contractor is
responsible for the care, maintenance, repair, and protection of any such property. Inventory .
records shall be 'maintained by Contractor and submitted to the State upon request. All such
property.shall be returned to the State upon the expiration of this contract unless the State
otherwise directs.
6. If travel is a reimbursable item, the reimbursement for necessary traveling eXPenses and per
diem shall be at rates set in accordance with Department of PersOnnel Administration rates set
for comparable classes of State employees. No travel outside of the State of California shall be
authorized.· No travel shall be authorized outside of the legal jurisdiction of Contractor without
prior authorization by the State.
o
Prior ~uthorization by the State in writing is required before Contractor will be reimbursed for
any purchase order or Subcontract exceeding $2,500 for. any articles, supplies, equipment, or
services to be purchased by Contractor and claimed for reimbursement. Contractor must justify
the necessity for the purchase and the reasonableness of the price or cost by submitting three
competitive quotations or justifying the absence of bidding.
Prior approval by the State in writing is required for the location, costs, dates, agenda,
instructors, instructional materials, and attendees at any reimbursable training seminar, workshop
or conference, and over any reimbursable publicity or educational materials to be made available
for distribution. Contractor is required to acknowledge the support of the State whenever'
publicizing the work under the contract in any media.
It is understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before aScertaining
the availability of appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid
program and fiscal delays that ~vould occur if the contracts were executed after that
determination was made.
· EXHIBIT C
BUDGET ESTIMATE
(Round all budget amounts to
nearest dollar)
1. Salaries (two positions)
10% Detective Sergeant ~ $107,377 per year $10,738
10% Police Detective ~ $96,266 per year $9,627
2. Overtime ~ Detective 1.5 hourly rate
Estimated 34 hours $2,361
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $22,726
,
Minor Decoy Operations, Shoulder TaP Operations, $2,500.00
and Narcotics Investigations 'Buy Money"
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,500.00
Two SpectraTek 500 1 watt Audio Transmitters ~ $1,137 $2,274.00
each
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $2,274.00
Program Director and Coordinator Attendance at
Summer 2004 and Winter 2005 Grant Meetings $2000.0
Registration Fees $500
TOTAL TRAVEL EXPENSE $2,500.00
~,~i~.~' ~ · '~, ! ~ $30,000.00
Exhibit E
Special Terms and Conditions
o
Disputes: Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this contract which is
not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Director, Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control, or designee, who shall reduce his decision to writing and mail or
otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the Contractor. The decision of the Department shall
be final and conclusive unless, within 30 days from the date of receipt of such copy, the
Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes to the State a written appeal addressed to the
Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The decision of the Director of
Alcoholic Beverage Control or his duly authorized representative for the determination
of such appeals shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of ~ompetent
jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as
necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. In connection
with any appeal proceeding under this clause, the contractor shall be afforded an
opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its appeal. Pending final
decision of a dispute hereunder, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance
of the contract and in accordance with the decision of the State.
Termination Without Cause: Either party may terminate this agreement at any time for
any reason upon ten (10) days written notice. No penalty shall accrue to either party
because of contract termination.
Contract Validity: This contract is valid and enforceable only if approved by the Office
of Legal Services, State Department of General Services, if required, and if adequate
funds are appropriated in Item 2100-101-3036, Budget Act of 2004, for the purposes of
this program.
Contractor CertificatiOns: By signing this agreement, Contractor' certifies compliance
with the provisions of CCC 304, Standard Contractor Certification ClauseS. This
document may be viewed at: www:dgs.ca.gov/contracts.
If the State determines that the grant project is not achieving its goals and objectives on
schedule, funding may be reduced by the State to reflect this lower le'cel of project
activity.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
DATE: July 28, 2004
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT:
PARKING METER RATE CHANGES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Master Fee
Schedule to increase parking meter rates from $.25/hour to $.50/hour within Parking District #1
along Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden and Cypress Avenues, the 300 block of
Baden Avenue and in Parking Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 12 & 15.
BACKGROUND
The Parking Commission was requested to fund one of the three parking enforcement officers through
District revenues, since a significant amount of parking enforcement time is expended within the District
boundaries. In addition, $700,000 in Parking District reserve funds have recently been obligated for the
purchase of property at 178-190 Airport Boulevard, which is to be developed as a temporary parking lot.
This expenditure has significantly reduced available reserves, which now stand at approximately
$400,000. As a result, in order to maintain growth in the reserve fund and to provide the estimated $75-
$80,000.00 (salary + benefits) for the enforcement officer, the Parking Place Commission has proposed
that selected parking meter rates be increased.
DISCUSSION
The Parking District currently has 600 metered parking spaces located throughout the general downtown
area. In 2001, the rates were raised on 235 meters located generally outside the main commercial corridor
(Miller, Baden, Walnut and upper Grand) from $0.15 per hour to $0.25 per hour. The rates of the
approximately 325 meters along the majority of Grand, Maple, Linden & Cypress, and adjoining metered
spaces in parking lots 1, 4 & 15 have remained $0.25 per hour since about 1988.
At its June meeting, staff proposed to the Parking Place Commission raising rates from $.25/hr. to
$.50/hr.on the 325 most heavily used meters in Parking District #1, those along Grand Avenue, the
200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden & Cypress Avenues, and within Parking Lots 1, 4, & 15. The
Commission was unanimous in its support of the proposed increase and requested staff study the rest of
the District to determine whether the rates should be raised in the remaining areas so that the District
could build up additional reserves.
StaffReport
Subject:
Page 2 of 2
Parking Meter Rate Increase
Staff surveyed the remaining meters and recommended increasing rates on an additional 74 meters
including those in Parking Lots 2, 5 & 12 (offBaden), and along the 300 Block of Baden Avenue, but
leaving the more "fringe" areas, along Miller Avenue, Airport Boulevard, the 000/200/400 blocks of
Linden Avenue, the 400 block of Cypress, and Parking Lots 3 and 11 remain at current rates. Revenues
from these meters are quite low, indicating low usage (approx. 33%). The Commission unanimously
supported this increase and supported retaining lower rates in the less used areas as an incentive to park a
little further away from the Downtown core.
Staff had initially estimated the proposed rate increase on the initial 324 meters would generate an
additional $80-100,000 per year. It is estimated that the increase on the additional 74 meters would
generate approximately $15-20,000 per year. It is anticipated that the proposed rate increase should
generate sufficient revenue to fund one parking enforcement officer without tapping into existing reserves,
and allow for a slight increase in reserves. The Commission noted the importance of the reserves to
provide the revenue necessary to allow for additional leasing or acquisition of property to provide new
parking spaces in the future.
Public Input - Property owners and tenants throughout the District were notified of the proposed meter
rate increase. Five members of the public attended the meetings. Three of the community members
supported the proposed increase, while the other two supported raising monthly permit rates (which were
increased three years ago) and reducing expenditures, as indicated in the attached letter.
CONCLUSION
Faced with ongoing budget constraints, the City Council has asked all Divisions and Departments to both
reduce expenditures and increase revenues to allow the City to continue to provide a high level of service
to the community. To this end, the Parking Place Commission has been asked to fund one of the three
parking enforcement officers through District revenues. In order to maintain growth in the parking
reserve fund it has been determined that additional revenues will be needed to cover this cost. Therefore,
the Parking Place Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the proposed parking meter rate changes.
~//~ ~... ~o~~/ -- By:
By:
Assistant City Man~8~r
City Manager
Attachment:
Draft Resolution
June 8, 2004 & July 13, 2004 Parking Place Commission Staff Reports
Parking Place Commission Minutes - June 8, 2004
Parking District Map
Letter to Commission dated July 13, 2004
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOI41 lTION AMENDING TItE MASTER FEE SC}tEDI JI,E TO
INCREASE PARKING METER RATES FROM $.2,5/HOUR TO
$..50/HOUR WITHIN PARKING DISTRICT #1 AI.ONG GIL~,ND
AVENIIE, TIlE 200/300 BI,OCKS OF MAPI,E, I,INDEN AND
CYPRESS AVENUE, TIlE 300 BLOCK OF BADEN AVENUE AND
IN PARKING I,OTS, I ,2, ~1~ ,.5, 12, &l,5
WHEREAS, staff desires amendment of the Master Fee Schedule to increase parking
meter rates from $.25/hour to $.50/hour within Parking District #1 along Grand Avenue, the
200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden and Cypress Avenue, the 300 block of Baden Avenue and in
Parking Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 12 & 15.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby amends the Master Fee Schedule to increase parking
~neter rates from $.25/hour within Parking District # 1 along Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks
of Maple, Linden and Cypress Avenue, the 300 block of Baden Avenue and in Parking Lots 1, 2,
4, 5, 12, & 15.
I hereby certil~ that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of ., 2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
S:\Current Reso's\7-28-04parking.meter.res.doc
Parking Place
Staff Report
Commission
DATE: June 8, 2004
TO:
Pm:king Place Commission
SUBJECT: Parking Meter Rate Changes
RECOMMENDATION:
That tile Parking Place Commission approve parking meter rate increases within Parking
District #1 on Grand Avenue and the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden and Cypress
Avenues and in Parking Lots 1, 4 & 15 h'om $.25/hom~ to $.50/hour.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The District cun:ently has 600 metered parking spaces located throughout tlhe general downtown
area. tn 2001, the rates were raised on 235 meters located generally outside the main commercial
co~.l'idor (Miller, Baden, Walnut and upper Grand) from $0.15 per hour to $0.25 per hour. The
rates of the approximately 325 meters along the majority of Grand, Maple, Linden & Cypress,
mad adjoinin.g metered spaces in pm'king lots 1,4 & 15 have remained $0.25 per hour since about
1988.
As you are aware, approximately $700,000 iu Parking District £unds have recently been obligated
:for the purchase of property at 178-190 Airport Boulevard, which is to be developed as a
temporary parking lot. This expenditure has significantly reduced available reserves, which now
stand at approximately $400,000. Additionally, City Mmaagem.ent has requested the Parkin.g
Commission h~vestigate funding one of the three parking enforcement officers through District
revenues, since a significant amount of parking enforcement time is expended within the District
boundmSes. In order to maintain growth in the reserve fund an.d to provide the estim, ated $75-
$80,000.00 (salary + bene:fits) for the Enforcement Officer, additional revenues wi Il be needed.
DISCUSSION:
In. order to address the need :['or additional revenues it is proposed that parking meter rates on
Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden a:ud Cypress Aven.ues and pm:king lots 1, 4 &
15 be increased fi:om $.25/hour to $.50/hour, or incrementally a.s follows:
Staft Report
RE: Pm'king Meter Rate I~mrea.se
Date: June 8, 2004
Page 2 of 2
Two-.Hour Meters
05¢ for six minutes
10¢ for twelve minutes
25 ¢ for thirty minutes
24-Minute Meters -
05¢ :for six minutes
10¢ for twelve minutes
20¢ for twenty- four minutes
District O.perating Revenues and Expenditm'es fbr 2002-2003 i.s shown below:
Operating Costs $220,000
O~p.erati~_Revenue
Meter Fees $235,000
Permit Fees $70,000 !
Total Aunual Revenue $305,000
Annual revenue in 2002-2003 was $235,000.00 for th.e 600 meters in the District m~d the daily
parking pemaits. It is an.ticipated that the proposed rate increase should generate mn additional
$80-100,000 per year, or sufficient revenue to fund one parking enforcement officer without
tapping into existing reserves. The reserves will continue to be important to provide the revenue
necessary to allow for additional leasing or acquisition of property to provide new parking spaces
in the future. '
CONCLUSION:
Faced ;vith ongoing budget constraints, the City Council h. as asked all Divisions and
Departments to both reduce expenditures and increase revenues to allow the City to continue to
provide a high level of service to the community. To this end, the Parking Commission has been
asked to fund one of the three pm:king enforcemen.t officers through District revenues. In order to
maintain growth in the pm:king reserve fund it has been determined that additimxal revenues will
be needed to cover this cost. Therefore, staffrecommends that the Parking Place Commission
approve klm proposed parki~ag meter rate chm~ges.
~usy Ka/!ld n
Principal Planner
Parking Place Commission
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
SUBJECT:
July 13, 2004
Parking Place Commission
Parking Meter Rate Changes
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Parking Place Commission approve parking meter rate increases within Parking
District #1 on Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden and Cypress Avenues,
the 300 block of Baden Avenue and in Parking Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 12 & 15 from $.25/hour to
$.50/hour.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
At its June 2004 meeting, the Parking Place Commission discussed raising rates on 324 meters in
Parking District #1, those along Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden & Cypress
Avenues, and within Parking Lots 1, 4, & 15, from $.25/hr. to $.50/hr. The Commission was
unanimous in its support of the proposed increase and requested staff study the rest of the District
to determine whether the rates should be raised in the remaining areas so that the District could
build up additional reserves. The Commission also requested staff investigate whether meter
time limits in Parking Lot 5 should be increased.
Meter Survey
Staff surveyed the remaining meters and recommends increasing rates on an additional 74 meters
including those in Parking Lots 2, 5 & 12 (off Baden), and along the 300 Block of Baden
Avenue. Staff also recommends that the more "fringe" areas, along Miller Avenue, Airport
Boulevard, the 000/200/400 blocks of Linden Avenue, the 400 block of Cypress, and Parking
Lots 3 and 11 remain at current rates. Revenues from these meters are quite low, indicating low
usage (approx. 33%). It is hoped that retaining these lower rates in the less used areas could
serve as an incentive to some to park a little further away from the Downtown core.
Staffhad initially estimated the proposed rate increase on the initial 324 meters would generate
an additional $80-100,000 per year. It is estimated that the increase on the additional 74 meters
would generate approximately $15-20,000 per year. As previously indicated, annual revenue in
2002-2003 was $235,000.00 for the 600 meters in the District and the daily parking permits. It is
anticipated that the proposed rate increase shOuld generate sufficient revenue to fund one parking
Staff Report
RE: Parking Meter Rate Increase
Date: July 13, 2004
Page 2 of 2
enforcement officer without tapping into existing reserves, and allow for a slight increase in
reserves. The reserves will continue to be important to provide the revenue necessary to allow for
additional leasing or acquisition of property to provide new parking spaces in the furore.
Time Limits
With the increase in meter rates it was suggested that consideration be given to increasing the
time limit in Lot 5 from two to three hours. Staffhas reviewed this and has no concern with this
and recommends that Commission approve the request.
CONCLUSION:
Faced with ongoing budget constraints, the City Council has asked all Divisions and
Departments to both reduce expenditures and increase revenues to allow the City to continue to
provide a high level of service to the community. To this end, the Parking Commission has been
asked to fund one of the three parking enforcement officers through District revenues. In order to
maintain growth in the parking reserve fund it has been determined that additional revenues will
be needed to cover this cost. Therefore, staff recommends that the Parking Place Commission
endorse the proposed parking meter rate changes.
Principal Planner
Attachment: Map
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PARKING PLACE COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, June 8, 2004
LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL
400 Grand Avenue
CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chair Luster.
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Chair Luster
Commissioner kli
Commissioner Faria
Also Present:
Susy Kalkin, Commission Secretary
Laura Iskra, Secretary Pro Tern
Mike Premenko, Parking Meter Service Worker
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
Sgt. Paul Ritter
Laurie Masetti
Jim Metz, Computer and Business Printing
MINUTES APPROVAL: None
AGENDA REVIEW: No changes.
AGENDA ITEMS:
· Parking Meter Rate Increase: Increase meter fees as follows for all parking meters on
Grand Avenue, the 200/300 blocks of Maple, Linden and Cypress Avenues and Parking
Lots 1, 4 and 15 frorn $.25 per hour to $.50 per hour.
Secretary Kalkin explained to the Parking Place Commission that City Council has asked
all departments and divisions to look at ways of increasing revenues based on the fiscal
considerations right now and that City Council is interested in the Parking District funding
one of the parking enforcement positions, which costs approximately $ 75,000.00 to
$80,000.00 per year, including benefits. Secretm:y Kalkin stated that in order to do this
Page 1
Parking Place Conmaission
Meeting 06/08/04
and keep a reserve balance the Parking District needs to look at revenue increases so the
Commission is being asked to consider increasing meter rates. Secretary Kalkin told the
Parking Commission there were approximately 325 meters along Grand, Maple, Cypress
and Linden Avenues m~d 3 parking lots adjacent to Grand Avenue, where rates have not
been raised since 1988, and staffis proposing a rate increase from. 25¢ to 50¢, which
would raise approximately $80,000.00 to $100,000.00 to cover the pm:king enforcement
position and hopefully allow additional growth in the reserve. She then opened up item
for discussion.
Chair Luster stated she thought it was a reasonable decision because, compared to other
cities, our City is way behind, but she realized there may be some opposition to the rate
increase.
Commissioner kli stated she agreed because since 1988 there had not been an increase
and the Parking District was certainly overdue.
Jim Metz told the Parking Commission he suggested last year raising all meters on Grand
Avenue to 50¢ per hour and dropping the monthly permit fee to $25.00. He also stated he
felt 50¢ is perfectly reasonable.
Laurie Masetti asked for a clarification as to where the lots were located.
Mike Premenko explained that lot #1 is on Grand Avenue next to Buon. Gusto, lot #4 is on
Grand Avenue next to Toppers and lot #15 is located on the corner of Cypress and Grated
Avenues.
Laurie Masetti said she th.inks it's entirely appropriate to raise the amount and felt it is a
real bargain since she paid $1.00 per hour in San Mateo and that San Francisco rates are
offthe charts. She also stated this was a wonderful opportunity for the community to
support the City in a time when everyone is in a crunch.
Jim Metz said at 50¢ per hour we're still the lowest on the peninsula.
Laurie Masetti said for the record she wants it clear that she is speaking as a South San
Francisco resident an.d not as the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce
because she has not heard fi'om the entire Chamber Board yet as what their position is. As
a resident she heartily supports the endeavor.
Jim Metz said he is speaking as a business owner and not as the President of the Chamber
of Commerce. He asked if reducing the parking pem~it to $25.00 is a definite no.
Chair Luster stated a modest raise of 50¢ per hour is a bargain because in San Francisco
Page 2
Parking Place Con~?aission
Meeting 06/08/04
she pays $1.00 and meters have gone up.
Commission Faria stated he was all :for the increase, but asked why we hadn't
incorporated other lots and leave the otter fringe lots the lower rate. He felt if the Parking
District is going to raise the rates they should do it in one fell swoop.
Jim Metz stated he didn't have a problem with raising the rates to 50¢ per hour but
suggested increasing the time limits, because when merchants are forced to park in
metered spaces they forget the time limit and get ticketed.
Commissioner Faria felt it would help permit sales because that rate is not being adjusted
and it would be a bargain compared to daily meter parking.
Jim Metz clarified raising time limits in the outer fr/nge lots and keeping Grand Avenue
area the same time limit.
Secretary Kalkin explained the more convenient spaces are still Grand Avenue and the
adjacent lots and she was concerned about the discussion of raising rates since it wasn't
noticed and suggested the Pm:king Place Commission could take it under consideration at
a future meeting.
Marty Van Duyn inforrned the Pm'king Place Commission that the new parking lot on
Airport Blvd. will be mostly permit and some pem~it space in lot #2 will be converted to
metered spaces.
Laurie Masetti stated if we're raising prices why didn't we took at raising all the lots and
meters.
Marty Van Duyn explained the philosophy as always been that we don't increase rates just
to increase, we increase rates for an express purpose and this increase is addressing a cost
that the Parking District is incurring. He infon~ed the Parking Commission that Secretary
Kalkin and Mike Premenko were asked to look at fee increases that would cover the cost
of a new Parking Enforcement Officer and they modeled the increase under the
philosophy of being consistent with the costs and that is why they looked at some meters
differently than others.
Commission Faria agreed there is merit to the i~crea.se, but asked when will the next need
be and should we start building up the reserve.
Marry Van Duyn stated much of the reserves will be used when the new lot is built.
There was a brief discussion regarding parking tots and parking structures.
Page 3
Parking Place Commission
Meeting 06/08/04
Secretary Kalkin explained funding for building the lots or structures are set up in the
reserves or there is a bond set up.
Motion: C onm'fissioner F aria/Second: Commissioner Irli: T o accept cun'ent p lan~s with
recommendation that staff investigate the parking lots not included for increase for
possibility of increasing those rates and advertise accordingly. Unanimously approved.
6. CORRESPONDENCE: None
7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
8. ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Chair Luster a,djoumed the meeting at 5:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Su~'y K..alt~i~t~ Commission Secretary
Frances Lus~r, Chair
Page 4
Parking Place Commission
Meeting 06/08/04
Downtown Parking District
Lux
Nil
I I~1 II II I I---[
I-HI Ill~/
I1'tl III/~
City Hall
Grand Avenue
O
Future
Parking Lot
Commercial
Railroad
Avenue
June 8, 2004 proposal to increase 324 meters to 50 cents per hour
July 13, 2004 proposal to increase 74 meters to 50 cents per hour
The remaining 202 meters to remain at 25 cents per hour
324 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 588- 2656
fax (650) 588 - 2594
July 13, 2004
South San Francisco Parking Commission
Monthly Meeting
Subject: Parking Meter Price Increase
As a merchantpin the downtown area the proposed increase in parking meters
is of great concern to us. As you will see South San Francisco akeady has
the highest parking meter rates of any city that borders it. We already have
problems with the parking situation in the downtown area. We feel that
increasing the rates would only make things worse.
The chart below shows the current parking meter rates from South San
Francisco and its surroundh~g cities.
Street Meter
Parking Lots
Daly City
So. San Francisco
San Bruno
Millbrae
5c - 20 minutes
10c- 40 minutes
25c - 1 hr 40 minutes
5c - 12 minutes
10c - 24 minutes
25c - 60 minutes
Free 2 hour parking
Some free 24 minute zones
Free 1 & 2 hour parking
Some free 20 minute zones
Some Metered
Some Permit
($30.00 monthly)
Free parking all
lots - 2 to 5 hours
Free parking all
lots - mostly 2
hour limit
Page Two
Some other ideas the commission might consider other than increasing meter
rates are-
Moving Permit Parking Lots tolower usage lots. As of now, too
many spaces, in the high volume lots, are being occupied by vehicles
with permits. Ifthe higher usage lots were all metered more money
would be generated by v~ehicles moving every 2 hours.
Raise the amount of the monthly permits.
Make each lot uniform, either all meters or all permits. This would
make it easier to enforce parking violations, therefore generating more
money.
Also, as a downtown merchan~I respectfully ask the purpose of the
proposed increase in meter rates. What is the additional money
needed for?
StaffReport
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 2004
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
Ballot Measures and Special Municipal Election
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution: 1) Calling for a Special Election, amending the City Clerk budget, establishing
procedures for the election and placing a measure on the November 2, 2004 ballot asking the voters to
authorize a special tax of one percent to be added to the existing Transient Occupancy Tax; 2) Placing a
measure on the November 2, 2004 ballot authorizing the City to impose a business license tax on commercial
billboard advertisers and establishing procedures for the conduct of such election.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
At its July 14, 2004, regular meeting, the City Council directed staff and the City Attorney to prepare
ballot measures to implement two special taxes. The first such tax, a special tax in the amount of one
percent (1%) would be added to the existing Transient Occupancy Tax, by amending Chapter 4.20 of the
Municipal Code. The second tax, a new tax on the operators of commercial billboards located in the City,
would amend Title 6 of the Municipal Code to add a specific category for commercial billboard operators.
The special tax imposed would equal eight percent (8%) of the gross revenue received by the operators for
advertising in the City. The amendments to Title 6 also specify the exempt signs and the manner in which
the tax will be collected.
The deadline for calling an election and submitting required materials to the elections official is 88 days
prior to the election, if the Council wishes the County to conduct the election and to have the election
consolidated with a statewide election and appear on that ballot. (Elections Code §10403.) In this case,
the deadline is August 6, 2004.
The resolution calling the election must include the type of tax, the tax rate, the method of collection and
the date of the election. The resolution calling an election on a special tax must describe the purpose of
the tax. (Govt. Code § 53724(a).) Since 2001, cities have also been required to include in special tax
measures accountability measures restricting the tax revenue to the identified purpose of the special tax,
creating a special account for the proceeds, and requiring the preparation of an annual report by the chief
financial officer describing any expenditure of the proceeds and the status of any projects funded by the
tax. (Govt. Code § 50075.1.)
The proposed ordinance imposing the taxes are attached to the resolution and, if approved by the voters,
would be adopted by the people. The taxes would then be effective ten days after the results of the
election are certified or on January 1, 2005, whichever is later. (Elections Code § 9217.)
The resolution calling the election also includes the ballot question. Additionally, Council may wish to
designate one or more of its members to write the argument in favor of the measure. (Elections Code
§9287.) If the Council designates one member to write the argument in favor on behalf of the City
Council, the Council could also authorize that councilmember to allow representatives of "bona fide"
organizations wishing to support the measure to sign the ballot argument. There is a limit of five
signatures on a ballot argument.
The attached Resolutions also establish the time period in which argument for or against the proposed
measures must be submitted, the time in which the City Attorney must prepare an Impartial Analysis and
the time for rebuttal arguments. Following are the timelines for submittals:
Direct arguments for or against the measures shall be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on
August 13, 2004.
Rebuttal arguments for or against the measures shall be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on
August 23, 2004.
o
The City Attorney shall prepare by August 11, 2004, an impartial analysis of each
measure showing the effect of the measures.
As noted in the Staff Report prepared by the Finance Director on July 14, 2004, the City's budget situation
has been very unstable since 2001-02. The continuing recession, the loss of a major sales tax generator,
revenue raids by the State, and rising retirement and health costs have all combined to cause a prolonged
period of fiscal strain on the City of South San Francisco. Based on the information received at the July
14, 2004 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare the attached Resolutions authorizing the City
Clerk to Call an election and staff to prepare the ballot measures.
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
Attachments:
~J~a~-I A. Wilso~ l~anager
Ordinances
Resolutions
Agreement
RESOLUTION NO.
CiTY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUq'ION ESTABLISHING NOVEMBER 2, 2004 AS THE
I)ATE FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON A PROPOSED
BALI.OT MEASIIRE SEEKING VOTER AUTHORIZATION TO
IMPOSE A ONE PERCENT (1%) INCREMENT TO BE ADDED TO
THE CITY'S EXISTING EXCISE TAX ON THE PRIVILEGE OF
I ISIN(; tt()TEI~ ACC()MMODATIONS IN THE CITY RAISIN(; THE
T()TAI~ TAX I;R()M EI(;IIT 1)ERCENT (8%) TO NINE PERCENT
(9%) WITH TIIE INCI~,EMI';NTAL AMOIJNT BEING USED F()R
I'ARK, I.IBRAI~,Y, P[JBI,IC SAFI~YI'Y AND RECREATI()N SERVICES;
ESTABLISHIN(; POI,ICIES AND PR()CE1)IJRES iN C()NNECTION
'vViTIt SUCH AN ELECTION; AMENDING THE CITY CLERK
ll[IDGET; AND REQUESTING TIlE COUNTY CLERK TO
CONDUCT THE ELECTION
WHEREAS, on August 22, 1966, pursuant to its authority under California Revenue and
Taxation Code sections 7280 et seq., the City Council of the City of South San Francisco ("the
City Council") adopted Ordinance No. 554, codified as Chapter 4.20 of the Municipal Code,
which provided for the imposition and collection of a general excise tax on the privilege of using
hotel accommodations in the City (a "transient occupancy tax" or "TOT") to be paid by hotel
users and collected by hotel operators; and
WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted Ordinance No. 638 on October 24,
1972; Ordinance No. 676 on October 16, 1974; Ordinance No. 772 on August 16 , 1978; and
Ordinance No. 1126 on March 24, 1993, with the TOT last being increased to eight percent (8%)
on August 16, 1978; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIC, Section 2(b) of the California Constitution requires that any
special or general tax, such as the TOT, must be approved by a vote of the voters voting on the
issue of increasing or imposing a tax; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco ("the City Council)
expressed its intent to impose an additional one percent increment tb the existing TOT, raising
the total TOT fi'om eight percent (8%) to nine (9%) during the duly noticed regular meeting held
July 14, 2004; and
WHEREAS, a substantial portion of the City's General Fund (as established in the City's
budget for Fiscal Year 2004-2005) is used for public safety purposes (police and fire protection
services) and the City Council has determined that an additional increment to the TOT is an
effective way of preserving other vital public services such as park, library, public safety and
recreation services at or near current levels in light of the present uncertainty regarding whether
the State will attempt to take additional funds from cities to eliminate the state budget deficit;
and
WHEREAS, after receiving information at its July 14, 2004 City Council meeting and
prior budget workshops regarding the effects of the current economy and State budget on the
City's finances and ability to fund necessary community services, and after subsequently
receiving testimony from tile public, tile City Council determined that the public interest would
be well served by asking the voters of South San Francisco to authorize an additional one percent
(1%) increment to the existing TOT raising the total TOT from eight pement (8%) to nine
percent (9%); and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIC, Section 2(b) requires that an election by the voters to approve
a general tax must be consolidated with an election for City Councilmembers; and
WHEREAS, the November 2, 2004 election does not include an election for any member
of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, given the uncertainty in the state budget, the City needs to identify revenue
sources for fiscal year 2005-2006 and thereafter in order to provide continuity in recreation and
other public services; and
WHEREAS, the one percent (1%) incremental adjustment to the TOT is hereby proposed
as a Special Tax with revenues derived from the increase specifically designated to fund park,
recreation, public safety and library services; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.1, the City declares that the
proceeds fi'om the special tax shall only be used for the purposes designated herein and that an
account shall be created for the purpose of maintaining such revenues. An accounting of the
funds deposited and report of all funds deposited and expended shall occur on an annual basis in
accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.3; and
WHEREAS, the tax imposed pursuant to this measure will be collected in accordance
with the procedures established in Exhibit 1, including any references contained therein; and
WHEREAS, as a Special Tax, the one percent (1%) increment must be approved by a
sixty-six percent majority vote; and
WHEREAS, after considering the foregoing information, the Council believes that the
one percent (1%) incremental adjustment to the existing TOT should be authorized by the voters
of South San Francisco in the amount described herein, with implementation of the increment
effective January 1, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the cost of conducting the Special Election is $26,000 and will be paid out
of the City Clerk's budget; and
WHEREAS, based on all of the information presented at the July 28, 2004 City Council
meeting, both written and oral, including the staff reports, minutes, and other relevant materials
(hereafter the "Record"), the City Council finds that under CEQA Guidelines 15060(c) (2) and
15378(b) (4), this tax does not constitute a project under CEQA and therefore review under
CEQA is not required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:
1. Call for Election. Pursuant to Elections Code § 9222, the City Council hereby
establishes November 2, 2004, as the date for a Special Municipal Election at which the voters of
the City of South San Francisco shall decide whether to authorize an additional one percent (1%)
increment to be added to the City's existing excise tax on the privilege of using hotel
accommodations in the City. The measure shall be designated by letter by the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Election Code Section 10400 et seq., the measure shall be consolidated with the
statewide general election to be conducted on November 2, 2004.
follows:
Ballot Language. The ballot language for the proposed measure shall be as
Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to add a one percent
(1%) increment on the existing hotel tax, paid by guests and collected by
hotel operators, raising the total tax imposed fi'om 8% of the room rate to
9 % of the room rate, with the revenue from said increment reserved for
park, recreation, library and public safety services'?.
Yes No
3. Proposed Ordinance. The ordinance authorizing a one percent (1%) increment to
be added to the existing TOT, pursuant to Section 2, is as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
4. Submission of Ballot Arguments and Impartial Analysis.
(a) The last day for submission of direct arguments for or against the measure
shall be by 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 2004.
(b) The last day for submission of rebuttal arguments for or against the
measure shall be by 5:00 p.m. on August 23, 2004.
(c) Direct arguments shall not exceed three hundre'd words and shall be signed
by not more than five persons.
(d) Rebuttal arguments shall not exceed two hundred fifty words and shall be
signed by not more than five persons; those persons may be different persons than the persons
who signed the direct arguments.
(e) The City Attorney shall prepare by August 11, 2004, an impartial analysis
of the measure showing the effect of the measure.
[Optional] (f) The Mayor (or Councilmember ) is hereby
attthorized to prepare written arguments in favor of the proposed measures, not to exceed 300
words, on behalf of the City Council. The arguments may also be signed by bona fide
associations or by individual voters who are eligible to vote.
5. Request to Order Election. The City Council hereby requests that the San Mateo
County Board of Supervisors order this election to be conducted by the County Clerk and the
County Election Department officials in connection with the general election to be held
November 2, 2004.
6. City Clerk Budget Amendment. The budget for the City Clerk shall be increased
by $26,000 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and adoption, and the City Clerk is directed to send certified copies of this Resolution to
the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and to the County Clerk-Recorder. The Services
Agreement for the Provision of Election Services between City of South San Francisco and San
Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of ,2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
s :\Current Reso's\7-28-04FINAL.TOT.RES.DOC
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING CHAPTER 4.20 OF THE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING
SECTION 4.20.033 CONCERNING THE TRANSIENT
OCCUPANCY TAX
The People of the City of South San Francisco do hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1.
Chapter 4.20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows: (with text in strikeout indicating deletion and
double-underlined text indicating addition):
Section 4.20.030 Amended "For the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each
transient is sub. ject to anti slnall pay a general tax in tine amount of eiglnt percent of
the rent charged by the operator and a special tax of one percent. The total general
and special taxes imposed pursuant to tiffs Chapter shall equal nine percent of the
rent charged by the operator. If a room is rented by a firm, corporation,
partnership, joint venture or any other organization on a long term basis, the tax
hereby imposed shall fall upon and be borne by each individual who occupies or
has the fight to occupy the mom for a Period of thirty consecutive days or less.
The tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the city which is extinguished
only by payment to the operator or to the city. The transient shall pay the tax to the
operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If the rent is paid in installments, a
proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax
shall be due upon the transient's ceasing to occupy space in tine hotel. If for any
reason the tax due is not paid to the operator of the hotel, the tax administrator
may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the tax administrator."
Added Section 4.20.033:
"4.20.033 There is hereby imposed a special tax upon the privilege of
occupancy in any hotel. Each transient is subiect to and shall pay a special tax of
one percent of the rent charged by the operator. The revenue generated by the one
percent increment shall only be used for the purpose of funding parks, recreation,
library and public safety services and slnall be in addition t~), and separate fi'om,
the general excise tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 4.20.030. If a room is rented
by a firm, corporation, partnership, ioint venture or any other organization on a
lon~ term basis, the tax hereby i~nposed shall fall upon and be borne by each
individual who occupies or has the right to occupy the room for a period of thirty
consecutive days or less. The tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the
city which is extinguished only by payment to the operator or to the city. The
transient shall pay the tax to the operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If
the rent is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with
each installment. The unpaid tax shall be due upon the transient's ceasing to
occupy space in the hotel. If for any reason the tax due is not paid to the operator
of the hotel, the tax administrator may require that such tax shall be paid directly
to the tax
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION :5.
Severability. If any provision of this ordinance orthe application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this
ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other
persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue
in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this ordinance are
severable. The People of the City of South San Francisco hereby declare
that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause, or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses,
or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable.
Election Required for Tax to be Effective. The tax proposed by this
ordinance shall not become effective until approved by 2/3 of the voters
voting on the issue att the November 2, 2004 election.
Effective Date of Tax. If this ordinance is approved by a majority of the
voters voting on the issue at the November 2, :2004 election, pursuant to
Elections Code Section 9217, this ordinance shall be considered adopted
on that date and the tax shall become effective January 1, 2005, or no
sooner than 10 days after the Council certifies the results of the election,
whichever occurs later.
Publication. This Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of
those City Councilmembers voting for or against it, in the San Mateo
County Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of South San
Francisco, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco, held the day of July 28, 2004.
Adopted as an Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting
of the City Council held the __ day of ,2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing
Ordinance this __ day of __, 2004.
Mayor
EXHIBIT B
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF ELECTION
SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND SAN MATEO COUNTY
ASSESSOR-COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER
This agreement, entered into this __ day of ., 2004, by and between the City of
South San Francisco and San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder (hereinafter referred to
as County Clerk);
WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that the County Clerk be retained for the purpose of
conducting an election hereinafter described for the City of South San Francisco (hereinafter referred
to as City);
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS:
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO:
1)
No later than the 88th day prior to the election the City of South San Francisco will request
the Board of Supervisors through the County Clerk to conduct an election for the City of
South San Francisco on November 2, 2004, and will request services of the County Clerk.
This section is applicable only if additional mat~ers will be placed on the ballot, and a
resolution is required.
2)
The City will publish the Notice of Election and the Notice to File Declarations of Candidacy
for the offices to be voted on, and/or the Notice to File Arguments For or Against any
measure.
3)
The City will submit to the County Clerk the titles and exact number of offices to be voted
on, the names and ballot designations of the candidates for those offices, and/or the exact
ballot measure wording to be voted on by the 85th day prior to the election, or by the 82nd
day prior to the election if Elections Code §§ 10225, 10229, and 10407 become applicable.
4)
The City Clerk will prepare and deliver to the County Clerk the ballot pamphlet information
containing, as applicable, candidate statements, ballot measure, tax rate statement,
impartial analysis, arguments for or against and rebuttals thereto. The last day for primary
arguments (300 words) to be submitted is August 13, 2004. The last day for rebuttal
arguments (250 words) and impartial analysis is August 23, 2004.
5) The City will review and sign off on the sample ballot and official ballot wording for the
City's Candidates/Measures.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY COUNTY CLERK:
1) The County Clerk will select the sample and official ballot printer(s) and translators.
2) The County Clerk will prepare and dehver all election information to the printers and
translators.
3) The County Clerk will issue, receive and process absentee ballots.
4) The County Clerk will set up all polhng place locations, hire polhng place workers, pubhsh
required notice, and conduct the election.
5) The County Clerk will prepare a Canvass of Votes Cast and submit a Certificate of County
Clerk to the City of South San Francisco.
6) The County Clerk will conduct other various and miscellaneous election activities as
required including but not limited to all those required of the City's Election Official, other
than those described under "Services to be Performed by the City of South San Francisco".
TERMS:
This agreement shall be in effect for the performance of all services incident to the preparation
and conduct of the election to be held on November 2; 2004.
In the event the County Clerk is unable to perform services required under this Agreement, as
a result of employer/employee relation conditions, vendor conditions or other conditions beyond the
control of the County Clerk, the County Clerk will be relieved of all obligations under this Agreement.
The County Clerk may terminate this agreement after giving 72 hours written notice and the County
Clerk will be relieved of all obhgations.
This agreement can be mutually terminated upon a 30 day written notice.
CONSIDERATION:
In consideration of the performance of services and supPhes provided by the County Clerk, the
City of South San Francisco shall pay to the County Clerk a sum equal to the actual cost of such
services and supphes.
The City of South San Francisco shall make payment within 30 days of receipt of invoice from
County Clerk.
CITY:
Signature:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:
COUNTY:
Signature:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
RESOLUTION
A RESOI.tITION A[JT}tORIZING PLACEMENT ON THE
N()VEMBER BAI,I,OT A MEASURE SEEKING VOTER
AIITHORIZATI()N T() COLLECT A BIISINESS LICENSE TAX ON
TH()SE ENTITLES HAVING ADVERTISING SIGNS LOCATED
WITHIN THE CITY BASED UPON THE GROSS RECEIPTS OF
TH()SE ENTITIES FROM REVENIJE DERIVED FROM SAID SIGNS
AND AMENDIN(; TITI,E 6 OF T}tE SOIITH SAN FRANCISCO
MIJNICIPAI. C()DE, BIJSINESS RE(;UI,ATI()NS, TO SPECIFY
ENTITIES SI!B. IECT T() THE LICENSE REQ[IIREMENT AND
ESTABi,ISI liN(; PROCEDURES F()R COI,LECTING THE
B[!SINESS i,ICENSE TAX
WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under California Revenue and Taxation Code
Sections 7280 et seq., the City Council of the City of South San Fr. ancisco adopted Ordinance
No. 720, codified as Title 6 of the Municipal Code, which provided for the imposition and
collection of a general excise tax on the privilege of operating a business within the City (a
"business license tax") to be paid by owners and operators of businesses located in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain business operators, because
they do not have physical business addresses within the City limits, have not been subject to the
existing business license tax; and
WHEREAS, in order to ensure that all businesses deriving revenue from operations in the
City are treated equally, the City Council has determined that amendments to Title 6 are
required; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would impose a tax on those persons, fi~TnS,
corporations or companies owning or operating off-premises advertising signs where such signs
are located within the City and containing equal to or greater than 250 square feet of advertising
copy; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIC, Section 2(b) of the California Constitution requires that any
special tax, such as this business license tax, must be approved by a 2/3's majority vote of the
voters voting on the issue of imposing the tax; and
WItEREAS, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco ("the City Council)
expressed its intent to impose a business license tax on billboard advertisers in the amount of
eight percent (8%) of the gross receipts obtained from advertising on the billboards located in the
City during the duly noticed regularly meeting held July 14, 2004; and
WHEREAS, a substantial portion of the City's General Fund (as established in the City's
budget for Fiscal Year 2004-2005) is used for public safety purposes (police and fire protection
services) and the City Council has determined that imposing a business license tax on billboard
advertisers is an effective way of preserving other vital public services such as park, library, and
public safety services at or near current levels; and
WHEREAS, after receiving information at its July 14, 2004 City Council meeting and
prior budget workshops regarding the effects of the current economy and State budget on the
City's finances and ability to fund necessary community services, and after subsequently
receiving testimony from the public, the City Council determined that the public interest would
be well served by asking the voters of South San Francisco to authorize a business license tax for
billboard advertising in an amount equal to eight percent (8%) of the gross receipts obtained by
the owner/operator roi' such advertising; and
WHEREAS, given the uncertainty in the state budget, the City needs to identify revenue
sources for fiscal year 2005-2006 and thereafter in order to provide continuity in public safety,
library, parks and recreation services; and
WHEREAS, the billboard advertisers business license tax is hereby proposed as a Special
Tax with revenues derived from the increase specifically designated to fund park, recreation,
public safety and library services; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.1, the City declares that the
proceeds from the special tax shall only be used for the purposes designated herein and that an
account shall be created fol' the purpose of maintaining such revenues. An accounting of the
funds deposited and report of all funds deposited and expended shall occur on an annual basis in
accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.3; and
WHEREAS, the tax imposed pursuant to this measure will be collected in accordance
with the procedures established in Exhibit 1, including any references contained therein; and
WHEREAS, as a Special Tax, the tax must be approved by a 2/3's majority vote; and
WHEREAS, after considering the foregoing information, the Council believes that the
extension of the existing business license tax to commercial billboard operators provides for a
more equitable distribution of tax liability for business owners by capturing businesses that
derive revenue from advertising in the City but are not subject to the existing tax because they do
not have an office or facility in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an eight percent (8%) tax on the gross
receipts of said billboard operators should be authorized by the voters of South San Francisco
with implementation of the tax effective January 1, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the cost of conducting the Special Election is $26,000 and will be paid out
of the City Clerk's budget pursuant to the authorization contained in Resolution No.: ,
adopted by a 2/3 majority vote of the City Council on July 28, 2004; and
WHEREAS, based on all of the information presented at the July 28, 2004 City Council
meeting, both written and oral, including the staff reports, minutes, and other relevant materials
(hereafter the "Record"), the City Council finds that under CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)(2); and
2
15378(b)(4), this tax does not constitute a project under CEQA and therefore review under
CEQA is not required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:
1. Call for Election. Pursuant to Elections Code § 9222, the City Council
established November 2, 2004, as the date for a Special Municipal Election at which the voters
of the City of South San Francisco are to decide whether to impose an additional one percent
(1%) increment to the existing transient occupancy tax. The City Council has determined that it
is appropriate and efficient to add a measure for the voters' consideration to authorize a business
license tax for commercial billboard operators in the amount of eight percent (8%) of the gross
receipts derived from advertising signs located within the City of South San Francisco. The
measure shall be designated by letter by the City Clerk. Pursuant to Election Code Section
10400 et seq., the measure shall be consolidated with the City Special Municipal Election to be
conducted on November 2, 2004.
follows:
Ballot Language. The ballot language for the proposed measure shall be as
Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to collect a business
license tax fl-om owners and operators of commercial billboards located
within the City equal to eight percent (8%) of the gross receipts received
from such advertising with the revenue from the tax specifically reserved
for park, recreation, library and public safety services?
Yes No
3. Proposed Ordinance. The ordinance authorizing a business license tax for
commercial billboard operators pursuant to Section 2 is as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
4. Submission of Ballot Arguments and Impartial Analysis.
(a) The last day for submission of direct arguments for or against the measure
shall be by 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 2004.
(b) The last day for submission of rebuttal arguments for or against the
measure shall be by 5:00 p.m. on August 23, 2004.
(c) Direct arguments shall not exceed three hundred words and shall be signed
by not more than five persons.
(d) Rebuttal arguments shall not exceed two hundred fifty words and shall be
signed by not more than five persons; those persons may be different persons than the persons
who signed the direct arguments.
(e) The City Attorney shall prepare by August 11, 2004, an impartial analysis
of the measure showing the effect of the measure.
[Optional] (f) The Mayor (or Councilmember .) is hereby
authorized to prepare written arguments in favor of the proposed measures, not to exceed 300
words, on behalf of the City Council. The arguments may also be signed by bona fide
associations or by individual voters who are eligible to vote.
5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and adoption, and the City Clerk is directed to send certified copies of this Resolution to
the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and to the County Clerk-Recorder. The Services
Agreement for the Provision of Election Services between City of South San Francisco and San
Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of ., 2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
S:\Current Reso's\7-28-04billboard.res.DOC
4
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 6.16.048
IMPOSING A BUISNESS LICENSE TAX ON COMMERCIAL
BILLBOARD ADVERSTISERS OPERATING WITHIN THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
The People of the City of South San Francisco do hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Title 6 is hereby amended to read as follows:
New Section: "Chapter 6.16.048, Commercial Billboard Advertising
(a) Commercial Billboard Advertising Defined. For purposes of this section only,
"commercial billboard" means any sign which advertises goods, products, services or
facilities not sold on the premises upon which the sign is located ("off premises signs").
Nothing contained in this section sball be deemed or construed as applying to the owners
of real estate or their agents in advertising their property for sale or lease by means of
billboards or advertising sign boards situated upon the property advertised for sale or
lease by such billboards or advertising signs.
(b) "Operator" means any person, company or corporation who, as owner, lessee,
employee, agent or otherwise, operates, maintains, manages, keeps, permits or allows to
be operated, maintained, managed or kept any commercial billboard in or upon any
premises owned, leased, managed, operated or controlled by such"person within the city.
(c) Regulated Billboards. Those off-premises signs that have an advertising
area equal to or greater than 250 square feet in copy. The size of 250 square feet
minimum shall apply to the size of the entire advertising face of one billboard, even if
that billboard face may be divided into smaller portions for smaller advertising.
(d) Exempt signs: Those signs that are erected for less than 60 days and in
connection with a not-for-profit event.
(e) The license tax shall be paid to the City by the billboard operator. The license
tax payable by operator shall be eight percent of the gross receipts received by the
operator fi'om the sale, lease, or rental of advertising space on the regulated billboards
located within South San Francisco without deduction therefi'om.
(f) Tax shall be remitted by billboard operator to the City on a quarterly basis, and
shall be due to the City within 30 days after the close of a calendar quarter, i.e.,
within 30 days after: March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31st each
year. City may request backup revenue documentation fi-om operator sufficient to
support the tax payments by operator."
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
Severabilit¥. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this
ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other
persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue
in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this ordinance are
severable. The People of the City of South San Francisco hereby declare
that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause, or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses,
or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable.
Election Required for Tax to be Effective. The tax proposed by this
ordinance shall not becmne effective until approved by 2/3 of the voters
voting on the issue at the November 2, 2004 election.
Effective Date of Tax. If this ordinance is approved by a majority of the
voters voting on the issue at the November 2, 2004 election, pursuant to
Elections Code Section 9217, this ordinance shall be considered adopted
on that date and the tax shall become effective January 1, 2005, or no
sooner than 10 days after the Council certifies the results of the election,
whichever occurs later.
Publication. This Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of
those City Councilmembers voting for or against it, in the San Mateo
County Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of South San
Francisco, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
2
Introduced at a regular meeting of tine City Council of the City of South San
Francisco, held the day of July 28, 2004.
Adopted as an Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting
of fine City Council held the __ day of__, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve tine foregoing
Ordinance this __ day of __, 2004.
Mayor
EXHIBIT B
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF ELECTION
SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND SAN MATEO COUNTY
ASSESSOR-COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER
This agreement, entered into this __ day of ,2004, by and between the City of
South San Francisco and San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder (hereinafter referred to
as County Clerk);
WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that the County Clerk be retained for the purpose of
conducting an election hereinafter described for the City of South San Francisco (hereinafter referred
to as City);
NoW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS:
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO:
1)
No later than the 88th day prior to the election the City of South San Francisco will request
the Board of Supervisors through the County Clerk to conduct an election for the City of
South San Francisco on November 2, 2004, and will request services of the County Clerk.
This section is apphcable only if additional matl~ers will be placed on the ballot, and a
resolution is required.
2)
The City will pubhsh the Notice of Election and the Notice to File Declarations of Candidacy
for the offices to be voted on, and/or the Notice to File Arguments For or Against any
measure.
3)
The City will submit to the County Clerk the titles and exact number of offices to be voted
on, the names and ballot designations of the candidates for those offices, and/or the exact
ballot measure wording to be voted on by the 85th day prior to the election, or by the 82nd
day prior to the election if Elections Code §§ 10225, 10229, and 10407 become apphcable.
4)
The City Clerk will prepare and deliver to the County Clerk the ballot pamphlet information
containing, as applicable, candidate statements, ballot measure, tax rate statement,
impartial analysis, arguments for or against and rebuttals thereto. The last day for primary
arguments (300 words) to be submitted is August 13, 2004. The last day for rebuttal
arguments (250 words) and impartial analysis is August 23, 2004.
5)
The City will review and sign off on the sample ballot and official ballot wording for the
City's Candidates/Measures.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY COUNTY CLERK:
1) The County Clerk will select the sample and official ballot printer(s) and translators.
2) The County Clerk will prepare and dehver all election information to the printers and
translators.
3) The County Clerk will issue, receive and process absentee ballots.
4) The County Clerk will set up all polhng place locations, hire polling place workers, pubhsh
required notice, and conduct the election.
5) The County Clerk will prepare a Canvass of Votes Cast and submit a Certificate of County
Clerk to the City of South San Francisco.
6)
The County Clerk will conduct other various and miscellaneous election activities as
required including but not limited to all those required of the City's Election Official, other
than those described under "Services to be Performed by the City of South San Francisco".
.TERMS:
This agreement shall be in effect for the performance of all services incident to the preparation
and conduct of the electior[ to be held on November 2~ 2004.
In the event the County Clerk is unable to perform services required under this Agreement, as
a result of employer/employee relation conditions, vendor conditions or other conditions beyond the
control of the County Clerk, the County Clerk will be relieved of all obhgations under this Agreement.
The County Clerk may terminate this agreement after giving 72 hours written notice and the County
Clerk will be relieved of all obligations.
This agreement can be mutually terminated upon a 30 day written notice.
CONSIDERATION:
In consideration of the performance of services and supplies provided by the County Clerk, the
City of South San Francisco shall pay to the County Clerk a sum equal to the actual cost of such
services and supphes.
The City of South San Francisco shall, make payment within 30 days of receipt of invoice from
County Clerk.
CITY:
Signature:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:
COUNTY:
Signature: Date:
Print Name:
Title:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark Raffaelli, Chief of Police
BART PREFERRED PARKING PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council consider adopting a motion to suspend or modify the current
preferred parking plan that was instituted a year ago in anticipation of BART riders parking in
the neighborhoods adjacent to the South San Francisco station to avoid paying the fee to park on
BART property.
BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION
In June of 2003 the BART station in our city opened and charged a parking fee of $2.00 per day. In
anticipation of the impact to the adjoining neighborhoods, City Council adopted an ordinance
authorizing a preferred parking program for Buri Buff, Promenade and Sunshine Gardens. The purpose
was to prevent BART riders from parking in those neighborhoods and creating a negative impact on the
residents' quality of life.
Although the BART parking structure was never full, riders parked on the city streets to avoid paying the
$2.00 parking fee. In February of 2004 BART reduced the parking fee to $1.00, and in April the fee was
eliminated for the South San Francisco, San Bruno and Millbrae stations. The fees remained in place for
the Daly City and Colma Stations. However, the fee to ride BART is 50 cents less at those stations.
Since the elimination of the parking fee, the Daly City and Colma stations showed a weekly decrease of
2,200 riders; and the South San Francisco station increased its weekly rider-ship by 3,500. Millbrae and
San Bruno also showed increases but not as great.
During the week, the parking structure has about 80 open spaces on the top floor. The bottom floor,
which is for monthly reserved parking, is at about 10% of its capacity; and the reserved exterior lots are
at approximately 35%.
A spokesperson for BART has informed us that there are no immediate plans to institute a parking fee
but that preparations are in place for opening an unknown number of the reserved parking spaces for
general parking. Currently, the South San Francisco BART station has 519 reserved spaces; and even if
BART only released half of those spaces, it should provide sufficient parking for the immediate future.
Staff Report
Subject: BART PREFERRED PARKING PROGRAM
Page 2
The number of citations given in the neighborhoods surrounding BART has decreased considerably, and
those who were cited were primarily students attending E1 Camino High School or friends of residents
visiting the area. Originally, we were passing through the areas twice a day; however, as of two months
ago, we reduced our inspections to once a day and deployed our resources to address other parking issues
in the city. Since our meetings with the residents of the affected neighborhoods, we have suspended
enforcement until a decision is made.
As a result of the cancellation of the BART parking fees, some of the residents in the preferred parking
areas have requested we lift the parking restrictions because there are enough parking spaces in the
structure, and the need for street parking in no longer a threat.
In order to better assess the community needs, Council directed the police department to meet with the
affected residents. Notices were hand delivered to each of the 700 plus homes that are in the preferred
parking neighborhoods. We attached a survey for those residents who would be unable to attend the
meeting requesting they respond to the following: 1) Keep the permit parking; 2) Eliminate it; or 3)
Modify it. We also asked for comments. They were given the option of mailing the survey or e-mailing
their responses to us. We received 79 responses. Attendance at the meetings was lower than
anticipated: 10 residents were present at the Buri Bud and Promenade meeting and only 8 attended the
Sunshine Gardens meeting. On July 12, 2004, a resident of San Felipe submitted the names of six (6)
San Felipe neighbors and two (2) Camaritas residents that want the signs to remain. One neighbor
wanted it modified. These numbers are reflected in the totals shown on the following chart.
Sunshine Gardens 17 7 4
Buri Buri 17 18 2
Promenade 13 I 0
Comments:
Sunshine "~'~ -"'
(3) Keeps the junk cars off the street and the streets are cleaner
(1) There is a place to park in front of the home
(5) Keeps the students from parking on the streets
(1) Inconvenient to have visitors
(2) Like the streets being patrolled
(1) High school students speeding on residential blocks has decreased
Buri-Buri:
(5)
(6)
Keeps the jumk cars, RVs, boats and basketball hoops off the streets
Inconvenient, visitors get cited
Staff Report
Subject: BART PREFERRED PARKING PROGRAM
Page 3
Promenade: (1) Keeps Greenridge residents overflow from parking on Freesia
(3) Will keep overcrowding with the new development off the city streets
(3) BART's no fee policy will not be forever
(1) With extended families, the plan is forcing them to use their garages
(1) Like the added patrol
Attached is a map indicating where those who responded reside. Their preference is noted on their
address.
CONCLUSION
The initial purpose of the plan was to address parking problems that were anticipated by the BART
riders on the neighborhoods. If we used that as our foundation, with the elimination of the BART
parking problem, the plan should be suspended.
However, we wanted Council to be aware of the unexpected benefits resulting from the preferred
parking plan that have enhanced the quality of life in the neighborhoods. In light of this, I would like to
remind Council that other areas of town have made inquiries for preferred parking for the same reasons
given in the survey above. Should council choose to keep the preferred parking on certain streets, other
neighborhoods may also want it. Needless to say, adding other neighborhoods would be costly. The
rationale to keep or modify the current plan is that we have already established a program in the
neighborhoods surrounding BART, which would be needed to be put into effect should rider-ship
increase and parking fees added.
Should council choose to suspend or modify the plan, we would recommend leaving the sign poles in
place and posting other signage on the poles (cost of the signs would depend on the type and would
range between $500 to $1,500). If BART riders begin to park in the neighborhoods in the future, we
could easily repost the preferred parking signs and activate the plan.
Based on the low number of responses we received, any modification of the plan would be, at best, a
guess/~d may or may not cause a reaction from the residents. Freesia Drive and some of the streets
adj a~eht to E1 Camino High School are the only areas impaired by individuals who do not live in the
neighborhood.
By ~Vlaric lk/affa~elld/ /
Chief of Police
Michael A. Wilson
City Manager
Attachment: Map
LEGEND:
K - Keep
C - Cancel
M - Modify
Colma
Holy Cross Cemetery
South San
Francisco
Corp. and/or its suppliers. P41 ri~lhts resen/ed.
'"., ~S a n Franoisco
',, Kaiser Permanente-S
'",-. ~'S~_n Francisco
San Mateo
Municipal
Court-Northern
StaffReport
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 28, 2004
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 including approving plans and specifications for CIP
projects and approval to advertise for construction bids, when the plans and specifications are
completed.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) outlines the infrastructure improvements throughout the community.
The program is the result of collaboration among various departments outlining the needed improvements and
the priority for implementation of these projects. The program funding will only include this fiscal year and the
projects in the future years will be appropriated in the future budget cycle. The Planning Commission has
reviewed this program and has adopted a resolution finding the CIP consistent with the General Plan. The total
CIP budget for this fiscal year, including prior appropriation, will be $67,759,118. The CIP continues
improvement of the City streets, storm drains, traffic, sanitary sewers, facilities and parks.
New Projects for this year include: · The annual Street Resurfacing Program.
· Slurry sealing of various City streets.
· Oak Avenue Extension.
· E1 Cortez Drive Improvements.
· New Fire Station No. 61.
Staff Report
SUBJECT:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
Page 2
Upon adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, Council is also approving the plans and specifications for
projects within this program and authorizing the solicitation of construction bids.
FUNDING:
The total CI? budget for this fiscal year will be $67,759,118 of which $ 44,823,695 is in prior year
appropriation and $22,935,423 is in new appropriation. The new appropriation of $22,935,423 will consist of:
Capital Improvement (General Fund) $ 237,500
Grants $ 195,759
Redevelopment (Tax Increment) $ 9,717,500
Bonds $ 8,697,638
Developer Fees $ 567,000
Gas Tax $ 511,000
Measure A $ 1,186,000
Sewer Fund $ 1,302,626
Other* $ 520,400
TOTAL $22,935,423
*Other Funding consists of $50,000 for traffic signal emergency pre-empts, $170,400 for voice mail and
Police/Fire Computer Aided Dispatch/Record Management System upgrades, and $300,000 for new City
parking lot.
By:
Marry Van Duyn
Assistant City Manager
Approved b~ ~t ~
'~hae~ A. Wil/n"ff
City Manager
Enclosure:
-Resolution
-Memo from Dave Woo, Revision to the Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program FY 2004-2005
-FY 2004-05 Capital Improvement Program
G:\CIP 04-05\City Council Staff Report.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCfL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALff;'ORNIA
A RES()I,I ITI()N APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPR()VEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 AND APPROVING
PIA~NS AND SPECIFICATIONS F()R PROJECTS IJNDER THIS
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, upon adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, Council is also
approving the plans and specifications for projects within this program and authorizing the
solicitation of construction bids; and
WHEREAS, the total Capital Improvement Program budget for this fiscal year will be
$67,759,118 of which $44,823.695 is in prior year appropriation and $22,935.423 is in new
appropriation; and
WHEREAS, the new appropriation of $22,935,423 will consist of:
· Capital Improvement (General Fund) $ 237,500.00
· Grants $ 195,759.00
· Redevelopment (Tax Increment) $ 9,717,500.00
· Bonds $ 8,697,638.00
· Developer Fees $ 567,000.00
· Gas Tax $ 511,000.00
· Measure A $1,186,000.00
· SewerFund $1,302,626.00
TOTAL
$22,935,423.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal
Year 2004-2005 and approves plans and specifications for projects under this program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council approves the plans and specifications for
projects within this program and authorizes the solicitation of constrU~:tion bids.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
__ day of ,2004 by tine following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
S:\Currcnt I>,eso's\7-28-04capital.imp.program.year.res.doc
City Clerk
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Memo
To:
CC:
From:
Date:
Re:
City Council via City Manager
Assistant City Managers, Director of Finance, City Treasurer, City Attorney,
Executive Staff
Assistant Director of Finance ~.~.¢'2.--¢,---~._
July 28, 2004
Revisions to the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program FY 2004-2005
Document
Attached is a three-page insert containing changes to the Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program FY 2004-2005 document presented to the City Council
this evening. The revisions incorporate a change in funding sources for the
new City parking lot, a rollover of the existing capital budget for this parking lot,
and the addition of a project to perform site remediation on the parcel at 27
South Linden Avenue.
Attachments
· Page 1
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
FY 2004-2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Amount % of Total
Streets $4,275,000 18.6%
Storm Drains $280,000 1.2%
Sanitary Sewer $10,484,264 45.7%
Public Facilities $6,623,000 28.9%
Parks $497,000 2.2%
Traffic $355,000 1.5%
Information Technology $421,159 1.8%
Amount % of Total
Capital Improvement (General Fund) $237,500 1.0%
Grants $195,759 0.9%
Redevelopment (Tax Increment) $9,717,500 42.4%
Bonds $8,697,638 37.9%
Developer Fees $567,000 2.5%
Gas Tax $511,000 2.2%
Measure A $1,186,000 5.2%
Sewer Fund $1,302,626 5.7%
;Other $520,400 2.3%
Amount % of Total
Streets $6,459,577 9.5%
Storm Drains $575,000 0.8%
Sanitary Sewer $44,213,005 65.3%
Public Facilities $12,846,632 19.0%
Parks $733,450 1.1%
Traffic $997,000 1.5%
Information Technology $746,854 1.1%
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program $1,187,600 1.8%
* Total Appropriation includes new appropriation for FY 2004-05 plus estimated
carryover available funding from prior years.
PUBLIC FACILITIES - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 18 - NEW FIRE STATION NO. 61, ADMINISTRATION OFFICES AND TRAINING FACILITY
THIS PROJECT WILL RENOVATE THE FACILITY ACQUIRED AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CANAL STREET AND SOUTH
SPRUCE AVENUE FOR FIRE STATION 61, ADMINISTRATION OFFICES AND A TRAINING FACILITY.
ITEM NO. 19 - WESTBOROUGH RECREATION CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
THiS PROJECT WILL INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING AT THE WESTBOROUGH CENTER TO KEEP THE BUILDING IN A MORE HABITABLE
CONDITION FOR THE VARIOUS USES.
ITEM NO. 20 - CITYWIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
THIS PROJECT WILL STUDY THE SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS.
ITEM NO. 21 - NEW LIBRARY
THIS PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT A NEW LIBRARY TO ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.
ITEM NO. 22 - NEW CITY PARKING LOT
THIS PROJECT WILL PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, DEMOLISH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND CONVERT 178-190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD TO A CITY PARKING LOT.
ITEM NO. 23 - SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PERFORM AN ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP OF THE LOT AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 3 - Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
METHOD
ITEM NO.
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
PROJECT COSTS
18 NEW FIRE STATION NO. 61, ADMINISTRATION 1,000,000
OFFICES AND TRAINING FACILITY
(51-13232-9921 )
19 WESTBOROUGH RECREATION CENTER HVAC 100,000
INSTALLATION
20 CITYWlDE SPACE ANALYSIS
21 NEW LIBRARY
22 NEW CITY PARKING LOT 1,002,000
23 SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 75,000
75,000
30,000,000
YEAR PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIATI
~DA 5,000,000 0
FBD
TBD
TBD
;PD 702,000 702,000
PD/RDA
RDA
PAGE SUBTOTAL 2,077,000 175,000 0 0 30,000,000 5,702,000 702,000
11
ON
TOTAL 12,846,632 2,519,000 409,000 659,000 30,584,000 13,946,832
CI=CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP= DEVELOPER FEES
SB=SAN BRUNO SHARE
SWRP=SOLD WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAM
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
MA=MEASUREA
GT = GAS TAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW =GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2004- 2005
July 28, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
SUMMARIES: APPROPRIATION CHARTS
APPROPRIATION TABLES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NOTES
PROGRAM DETAIL: STREETS
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
STORM DRAINS
SANITARY SEWERS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
PARKS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
1
2
3
4-27
28
SEE TABS
A
RESOLUTION NO. ,__
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2004-2005
WHEREAS, the total Capital Improvement Program budget for fiscal 2004-2005 will be $ 66,982,118 of which $ 44,121,695
in prior year appropriations and $ 22,860,423 is in new appropriations; and
WHEREAS, the new appropriation of $ 22,860,423 will consist of:
is
Bonds
Grants
Capital Improvement (General Fund)
Developer Fees
Gas Tax
Measure A
Redevelopment (Tax Increment)
Sewer Fund
Others
TOTAL
$8,697,638.00
$195,759.00
$237,500.00
$567,OO0.00
$511,000.00
$1,186,000.00
$9,942,500.00
$1,302,626.00
$220,400.00
$22,860,423.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
approves the Capital Improvement Program budget for fiscal year 2004-2005.
South San Francisco the City Council hereby
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco at a regular meeting held on the __ day of by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
ATTEST:
/s/Sylvia M. Payne
City Clerk
RESOI,UTION NO. 2637
RESOIJUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED
2004-2005 CAPITAi~ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS CONSISTENT
WITIt TIlE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the Stale of California Plamfing and Zoning Law requires the Planning Commission to review the Capital
hnprovement Program each year and make a determination that it is consistent with the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Capital Improvement Program at its regular meeting held on and
finds it consistent with all applicable City goals, objectives, policies and programs for the General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning commission of the City of South San Francisco that it hereby
has determined that the Proposed Capital hnprovement Program for 2004-2005 is consistent with the South San Francisco
General Plan.
AYES:
Commissioner Giusti, Commissioner Honan, Commissioner Romero, Commissioner Sim, Commissioner
Zemke and Chairperson Ochsenhirt
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Vice Chairperson Teglia
ATTEST:
/s/Thomas C. Sparks
Commission Secretary
Thomas C. Sparks
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
FY 2004-2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
: New AppropHatioh BY ProgTam ! Project Type
Amount % of Total
Streets $4,275,000 18.7%
Storm Drains $280,000 1.2%
Sanitary Sewer $10,484,264 45.9%
Public Facilities $6,548,000 28.6%
Parks $497,000 2.2%
Traffic $355,000 1.6%
Information Technology $421,159 1.8%
· TOtal Appro~i~fi6~ By program / P~oje~t:Type *
Amount % of Total
Capital Improvement (General Fund) $237,500 1.0%
Grants $195,759 0.9%
Redevelopment (Tax Increment) $9,942,500 43.5%
Bonds $8,697,638 38.0%
Developer Fees $567,000 2.5%
Gas Tax $511,000 2.2%
Measure A $1,186,000 5.2%
Sewer Fund $1,302,626 5.7%
Other $220,400 1.0%
Amount % of Total
Streets $6,459,577 9.6%
Storm Drains $575,000 0.9%
Sanitary Sewer $44,213,005 66.0%
Public Facilities $12,069,632 18.0%
Parks $733,450 1.1%
Traffic $997,000 1.5%
Information Technology $746,854 1.1%
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program $1,187,600 1.8%
* Total Appropriation includes new appropriation for FY 2004-05 plus estimated
carryover available funding from prior years.
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2004-2005
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Impr. Redevelopment Bonds/ Developer Sewer Slorm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM 25,000 ...... 25,000
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM - - _ - ......
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION - _ 50,0OO 50,000 ___ - - ._~1_O0,0~0~._
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION - _
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 100,O00 100,0OO
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION - -
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS .... 50,000 50,0~O~
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION - - 2,000,0_0--0 - - __._ -~ - _ - 2,000,000
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE - - 20,000 - 20,000
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
STREET RESURFACING P_ROGRAM, 2004-2005 ...... 200,000 380,000 -___ 580,000
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005 300,000 300,000
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD - -
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAM_.P~S - - 1,000,000 1 ,_000,000
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE 100,000 100,000
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
2 025 000 i,000,000 . 900,000 ~ - 4,275,0gO
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
ToTAL~AILROAD cROssINGS - .. I~ -i i :;:~ - .
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN - 55,000~ - 55,000
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN - - 150,000 - - 150,000
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR .....
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN 75,000 75,000
. ~O~ STORM DRAINS : .- 280,000 ~ 280,000
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER - __ - 100,000 __. 100,000
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II 509,638 56,626 566,264
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM -
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR - 100,000 100,0~
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR - -
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR._, PH I/PRIOR I (WW, PH IV) ....... -
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER - 75,000 - 75,0(~
LiNDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET~NEATHER, PH IV 6,603,000 730,000 7.333,000~
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM - _
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT 100,000 100,000
~=UMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV. 1,500,000 '-- -_ 1,500,000
=UMP STATION RENOVATION -
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM __ - __-
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II - 495,000 ~- 55,000 550~0~3-0.
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV. - - - -
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER PROGRAM,_PHASE I __
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II - 90,000 - 10,00~" 100,000
; ~O'rAL SANITARy SEWER . 1.500,O00 7,697,638 ~ 1,286,626 10,~,264
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2004-2005
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Impr. Redevelopment Bonds/ Developer Sewer Storm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS .....
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 6,000 6,000 6,000 18,000
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50, _O0~ ..... - 50,000
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS ....
DAY CARE FACILITY .... _ __
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE 10,000 - .__ 10,000 20,000
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS -
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 12,500 37,500 50,000
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION 3,500,000 -__ __ 3,500,000
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT 300,000 300,000
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC - 1,000,000 1,000,000
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 - 50,000
ROOF INSTALLATION 60,000 60,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT 1,500,000 1,500,000
TRAIN STATION STUDY
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION - -
~OTAL PUBLIC FACiLITiES 182,500 - I 6,337,500 ~ : 6,000 6,000 16,000 - ~ 6,548,000
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
C_O~MM~ON~G_R_EE__NS TREE REMEDIATION ...........
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS - - 80,000 ...... _ _ 80,000
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS ......
LINEAR PARK TRAIL 417,000 417,000_
VARIOUS CIT_Y~G_R_E_E_ N S~P~O_T_S ...................... - - -_ .....
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
, TOTAL PARKS - 80,000 417,000 497,000!
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIR PORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS -
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL ___ 40,000 - 40,000
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR -
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT - 45,000 45,000
HIGHWAY 101 / PRODUCE SIGNAL
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL - __
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS - _ - __ - ____ 40,000_ - - - 40,000
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2004-2005
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
-- Capital Impr. Redevelopment Bo~ds/ Developer Sewer Storm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM 50,000 50,000
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR 150,000 30,000 180,000
TOT~ TRAFFIC, , . ~ 150,000 155,000 - . 50,000 355,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE 30,000 - ___ 30,000
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE - _ ...... -
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I - -
INTRANET - WES PROJECT 10,000 ~,000
LASER FICHE, PHASE II 15,000 15,000
PERMITTING PROJECT, I~& D ...... -
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM 25,000 25,000
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE 195,759 145,400 341,159
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM (ANIP)
PHASE XVIII ......
TOTAL ANiP '
GRAND I'OTAEi : : 237~_500~ i95,759 9,942i500 ~6~97i638 567 000 51ii000 1~186~000 1~302~626 - 220,~4~O0 22~ _86~_,4~2_3~
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2004-2005 Appropriations
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Impr. Redevelopment Bonds/ Developer Sewer Storm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM 25,000 25,000 - 50,000
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM - - 75,000 75,000
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION -- 92,_~0~ -_-___. 50~,.000~ __ - - _ .... 1~4_2,000_
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION .__
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 - 100,000_
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION 202,000 346,000 548,000
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS 50,_000~ ....... 50,000
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFAClNG PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION _ -
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION 2,600,000 _ 2,600,000~
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE 21,000 20,000 41,000
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION __ 57,000 _ - __ 57,000
STREET RESURFAClNG PROGRAM, 2004-2005 200,0~00_ 380,000 - __ 580,000
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION 2,000 20,000 22,000
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005 310,000 310,000
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD __ _ 516,000 516,000
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS 1,_000,000 92,000 1,092,000
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE - - 100,000 __ 1~,_0~_0_
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR 100,000 42,807 33,770 176,577
25,000 100,000 2,625,000 1,000,000 674~000 1,318,807 ; . i 716,770 6,459,577
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING ....
TO'r~ ~LROAD ~OSSINGS ; .. - ~ , ;~ , ~ ;. ~
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT 50,000 50,000
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN ...... _ .... _5~,_._0~_ - - - 55,000
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN .... L 184,000 - 184,000
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR 86,000 - 50,000 136,000
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION - __ 75,000 75,000
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN 75,000 75,000
ToTALSTORM DRAINS ; ~ - i36,000 = 314,~ ' 125~000 - 575,000
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER ___ - 100,000 __ 100,000
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II 509,638 56,626 566,264
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 100,000 - 100,000
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR - __ 100,000 - _ 100,000
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR 60,000 - _ 60,000
EAST OF 101 S~EWER IMPR., PH I/PRIOR I (WW, PH tV) ___ 12,976,944 1,900,000 14,876,944
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER - 75,000 75,000
L?DENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH iV 6,682,597 730,000 7,412,597
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM 55,970 55,970
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT 100,000 100,000
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV. 1,500,000 1,500,00~0
PUMP STATION RENOVATION 70,333 70,333
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM _ ___ 50,472 - _ 50,472
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II 495,000 55,000 _550,000
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV,
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION __ _ 106,862 ____' 106,862
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I 18,388,56~3 18,388,563
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II 90,000 10,000 100,000
: ': TOT~ SANiTARy SEWER 1,500,000 20,754,179 ._ 1~,9~,_000 ; r . 20,058,826__ ' 44,2i3,005
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2004-2005 Appropriations
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Impr, Redevelopment Bonds/ Developer Sewer Storm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS - - 500,000 ...... 500,000
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM 7,687 7,687
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 6,000 6,000 6,000 18,000
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000
.~ITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION ....
_CIT~Y-_W_IDE SPACE ANALYSIS ......... . - -
DAY CARE FACILITY _ .- - -_ 498,044 ~ - ........... - ....... - ....... 798,04~4
_EMER_GENC~YG_EN_E~RAT~0_R_R_EP_L:/~UPGRADE . , _ 76,092 .... 20,000 - - 96,092
?I~_E_S_T_ATIO~N 65~E_XTE~RI_0~RR__E__P..A_I_RS ........ - _ . . . . . - ......
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,382 - 10,382
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 12,500 - 37,500 .... 50,000
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION - __ _. 6,500,000 -__~ __ 6,500,000_.
MSB WALL LEAKS 25,000 25,000
NEW CITY PARKING LOT 300,000 __ - 3~,000
NEW LIBRARY - _ - - __ -
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC 1,000,000 1,000,000
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION -___ - 329,427 329,427
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 - 50,000
ROOF INSTALLATION 60,000 - I-- 60,000
SAN MATED COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT 2,500,000 - -_ 2,500,000
TRAIN STATION STUDY -_ ........ 75,000 _~75,000
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
283,974 768~i !0 83~,500 . 573,044 6,000 6,000 26,000 :" 329,427 12,069,632
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM -__ 75,000 75,000
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION - 75,000 75,000
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 80,000 80,000
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS - 50, _000~ 50,000
LINEAR PARK TRAIL 417,000 417,000
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS 9,650 ..... 9,650
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT 26,800 26,800
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE ............... - .... -
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATED AVE .....
BAYSHORFJAIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
91CYCLE DETECTION LOOPS - __
' 31TY-WlDE TRAFFIC MODEL 80,000 80,000
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD - _
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAM INO REAL/ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL 10,000 65,000 75,000
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL -__ ..... 270,000 270,000
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR 217, _O0~)_ ....... _21~7,0~0_
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL -
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND -
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT - _ - 45,000 __ 45,000
HIGHWAY 101 / PRODUCE SIGNAL -
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ____ - ......
MISCELLANE_OU_S TRAFFIC I~M_P~ROVEME~NT~S __ __~ - .... 80,000_ - - __80,~
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2004-2005 Appropriations
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Impr. Redevelopment Bonds/ Developer Sewer Storm
PROJECT NAME (General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water Other Total
MITCHELL AVENUE -
MUTCD UPDATE ..........
OPTICOM SYSTEM ......... 50,000 50,000
SIGN INVENTORY ........ __ -
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP - -
iSOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD . .
ISOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE - - - - __ _ --
INESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR 150,000 30,000 180,000
[ TOTALTRAFFIC . ~ 150,000 300,000 270,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE --70_,400 .... 70,400
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) 14,000 25,000 39,000
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE ____ - -
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I 15,000 40,000 1,000 56,000
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT 10,000 10,000
LASER FICHE, PHASE II 15,000 15,000~
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D -
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM - 25,000 ...... 25,000
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE ~,000 195,759 . 269,695 531,454
3'OTAL. INFORMAT!QN TECHNOLOGY 190,400 195,759 40i000 , 26,000 '/46;8~
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM (ANIP) _
PHASE XVIII - 1,187,600 .... 1,187,600
lii87,600 ,~ ~ : - i~ 1,187,600__
_53_5.~__~_4_ 1~491,046 15,092~500 22~327~223 2~46~7 000 1_,_!_16,000 1,908~807 20,110~826; 125~000 1~807 892 6__~L6 982,118
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
Capital Improvement (General Fund) Grants
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
~,NNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM .... 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000~ __ 5~0,00~
SOMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
SREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
~UARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
DAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR 50,000 100,000
TOTAL STR_EETS 25 000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100 000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
3'OTAL~LROADCROSSiNGs;; ; ;; ; . ; -
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH~FPRIOR I (WW, PH IV) _ ___
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
LINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS. WET WEATHER, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION f~3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
~-UMP STATION RENOVATION
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II
I
10
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
_ _ _ Cap_itel Improve~men~t_(~e~Ea_l_F..u_n~) ...... Grants
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM 7,687
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000 50,0~. _ 50,000 50,000
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION 100,~O00
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,382
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 12,500 25,000 25,000 25,000
VIISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
VISB WALL LEAKS 25,000
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61_, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
ROOF INSTALLATION 60,000 60,000 __ 60,000 60,000 60,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
TRAIN STATION STUDY
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOT~ 9,6~- .......... 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT 26,800
36,450 - 50,000 50000 __ 50,000 50,000: , . : ~: ~ -
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101 / PRODUCE SIGNAL
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
11
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E
.... Ca~pital I m_ p r~o_ve _meant .(_ _G. ~e _n~ r_al~F_u n d) ......... G?an~ts
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 06-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
: TOTAL TRAFFIC i__ . . .. , . , . .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE 40,400 30,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) 14,000
FINANCIAL/HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I 15,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
LASER FICHE, PHASE II 15,000 .15,000
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D 10,000 10,000
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE 66,000 195,759
ToTA~ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGy ~,000 ii0~ 95i~ 195,759 , -
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM (ANIP)
PHASE XVIII 1,187,600
12
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Redevelopment (Tax Increment) Bonds/Loans
Est, Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION 600,000 2,000,000
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET SLURRY SEAL 2004-2005
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS 1,000,000
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
600~ 2025,000 - 1,000,000 ,
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
TOT~ RAILROAD CROSSINGS :
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
~VALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
9EACON STREET STORM DRAIN
~IISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
;; TOTAL STORM DRAINS - -
SANITARY SEWER
'A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
~,IRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II 509,638 3,373,736
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
3,ALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
LA__ST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH I/PRIOR I (WW, PH IV) __ __ 12,976,944
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
LINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH IV 79,597 6,603,000
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV. 1,500,000 1,500,000
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II 495,000
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II 90,000 326,000
TOTAL SEWER 1,500,- ~! 1,500,000 ~ - 13,056,541 7,697,638 3,699,736
13
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Redevelopment (Tax Increment) Bonds/Loans
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 500,000
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DAY CARE FACILITY ........................ _4_9_8,_ ~._0~__
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 37,500
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION 3,000,000 3,500,000 1,000,000
VISB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT 300,000
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC t,000,000
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
ROOF INSTALLATION
SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT 1, _0~0,~.__ 1,500,000 1,000,000
TRAIN STATION STUDY 75,000
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
'1'O~ PUBEC 4,~,000 6,337;500
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 80,000
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
TOTAL PARKS ................
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SlSTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAM INO REAL/ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL 10,000
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101 / PRODUCE SIGNAL
LINDEN / PIN~E_TRAF~FIC SIGNA~L
14
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
.... ~_?development (Tax Increment) __ Bonds/Loans
Est. Avail Est, Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY I
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MiTCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
~SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
~/ESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
TOTAL TRAFFIC 10,000 - - , - ; -
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I 40,000
INTRANET * WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITI'ING PROJECT, R & D
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
POLICE CAD/EMS AND FIRE HMS UPGRADE
: ~'1'~ iHFbRMATiON TECHNOLOG¥ 40,000 ,
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM (ANIP)
PHASE XVIII
: TOTALANip ~: _~ ~~ '~ '__ " '
15
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Developer Fees Gas Tax
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION 42,000 50,000 400,000
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION 202,000
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION .......... 30,0(~-
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE 21,~)00
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION 57,000 250,000
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005 200,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION 2,000
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE __ 100,000_. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
350,000 1,530,000 850,000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING 200,000
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT 50,000 50,000 [ 50,000 50,000 ! 50,000
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN ......................
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR 86,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000
~ STORI~ DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
: TOT~ STORM DRAINS * . . i ~_ _ ._ 136,000 ' ..iL 100,000 100,000 100,__0~0_ _100,~
SANITARY SEWER
'A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II __.
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH I/PRI~OR I (WW, PH IV) _ 1,900,000
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
LINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
SANITARY SEWER iNSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WOCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II __
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II
16
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Developer Fees Gas Tax
Est. Avail Est, Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 97-08 FY 08-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 6,000 ! 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS ___
DAY CARE FACILITY __._
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE __.
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION _ __
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS __
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
ROOF INSTALLATION
SAN MATED COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
TRAIN STATION STUDY
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
: ~OT~ ~UBL!C ~iLiTiE$
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
--L CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS __ __
3ATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS ...........................
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
;; PARKS: 417,000
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS 18,00_0_
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL 40,000 40,000
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL 65,000 __
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT __45,000
183,000
HIGHWAY 101 /PRODUCE SIGNAL
150,000
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
17
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Developer Fees Gas Tax
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 40,000 40,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR 150,000 30,000
TOTAL. TRAFFIC_, ! 50,~O00~ ~_ - - - 145,000 155,000 80,000 80,000 431,000_
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
3EOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
POLICE CAD/FIMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
: : TOT~ iNFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AIRCRAFT NOISE iNSULATION PROGRAM (ANIP)
PHASE XVlll
TOTAL ANiP ~- ~ ~ ' . . ~ ;
GRANDTOTAL ,: [ 1~900,000 3i000i000~ 3,000,. .000 605;000 511,000 1,gi8,000 !~038~000 1+038~000 i 1~38gi000
18
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Measure A Sewer Enterprise
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION 50,000
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION 100,000
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 100,000
G_R_E~EN_D_A_L_E AVE~N__U_E R___EH~A_BI~LI_T_ATI_ON ........ 346,000
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS ....... ~0,000
HU NTIN~G~T~ON~AA_VE R E S~U_R_F_ AC I~N_G_P R OJ ................... 180,0(~0-
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE ...... ~i_0~ 40,000 40,000 -- 4--0,000 40,000 __.
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005 380,00~
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION 20,__.~
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005 10,000 300,000 150,000 150,_~0_0 150,000 150,000 ......
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BI-~/D
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR 42,807
i TOTAL STREETS : _.__ .41_~87.0_7_. 900,000 470,0OO 190,000 !90,000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
; ;;; ~(Tr~oADcRoSSiNGS ; ;;. . :
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN 55,000 55,000
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN 34,000 i 150,000
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN 75,000 75,000
TOTAL STORM DRAINS _ 34,000 28~0,_~0~0_
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER 100,000
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II 56,626
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM .................................. 1~00,000
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR 100,000
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR ........... 60,000 250,000
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH VPRIOR ~ (WW, PH IV) ._.
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER 75,000 225,000
LINDENVlLLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH IV 730,000
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM 55,970 20,00~_ 20,000 20,000 20,000
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT ...... 100,~0~30_ __
DUMP STATION f~3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION RENOVATION 70,333 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM 50,472 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II 55,000~ .....
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV. 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,00~
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION 106,862
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I 18,388,563 .............
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH ti 10,000
~ - ~; .. ,.: 18,772,200 ,1,286,626 i 1,065,000 590,000 590,000 , 590i000
19
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Measure A Sewer Enterprise
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY _. 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000_
CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE 10,000 10,000
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
ROOF INSTALLATION
SAN MATED COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
TRAIN STATION STUDY
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
! TOTAL PUBUC UTILITIES 6~,~._~. 8,000 8,000 i 8,000 8,000 .10i~ 8i~ 8,~ 8,000
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
~VESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
~OT~ PARKS ~ ~ ' I
rRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
' ~,IRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
~JRPORT BLVD & SAN MATED AVE
~AYSHORE/AIRPORT/SlSTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
;ITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 270,000
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
-~RANDVlEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
GRAND / EAST GRAND
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101 / PRODUCE SIGNAL
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
2O
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Measure A Sewer Enterprise
Est. Avail Est. Avalt
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 05-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
i TOTAL TRAFFIC __~ 270,000 - - _ ~ ~ ~ -
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) 25,000 50,000
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I 1,000
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE, PHASE ti
PERMI3-rlNG PROJECT, R & D
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
TOTAL iN FORMATION TECHNOLOGY ~ ; ' i . ' i" 26,000 50,0~0 . ~= .
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM {ANIP)
PHASE XVIII
:~: ~:!... .... __._~2~,_~.~_7 ........ ?.,!_~,_.~..... .... :._608,000 I 19~8, _070- 1_~.~_~0~0- 198,_000~ __1_8,808__,_200~.~1,30~2,_62~6 , 1,12~.000598,000 598,00~__ 5_~000_
21
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Storm Water Other
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM 75,000 50,000 50,000 ~,000 50,000
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PtNEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD 516,000
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS 92,000
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR 33,770
TOTAE STREETS ;., 716,770 50,000 50,000 50,000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
TOT~ RAi~OAD CROSSINGS
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR 50,000
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN/_ IMPLEMENTATION __ 75,000 75,000 _ 75,000
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
TOT~ STORM D~A ~ i25;~ ~ 75,000 ~ ~ :,.,
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH I/PRIOR I (WW, PH ~__
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
LINDENVlLLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH II
22
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Storm Water Other
Est. Avail ESL Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prtor Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL ./UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW LIBRARY
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION 329,427
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
ROOF INSTALLATION
SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
TRAIN STATION STUDY
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
:: ~O~PUBE C ~J~iES ~ ;~ : ~ : 329i427
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,00--0
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS 50,000
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
TOT~ pARKS ~ ~ , 200 000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE 947,000
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE 349,000
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE 785,000
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SlSTER CITIES 333,000
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD 421,000
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE 1,265,000
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD 924,000
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE 1,609,000
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR 217,000
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL 594,000
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD 609,000
GRAND / EAST GRAND 565,000
HARBOR WAY 2,721,000
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101 /PRODUCE SIGNAL
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
23
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Storm Water Other
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE 1,942,00~0
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM 50,000
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP 1,386,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD 1,946,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE 302,000
~NESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
TOT~ TRAFFIC , ', : 217 000 50,0002,854;000 ~ i3,279,000
iNFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM 25,0005,000
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE 124.295 ! 145,400
TOTAL iNFORMATION TECHNOLOGY _ - ~ - .. 124,295! 170,400 5,000 - - -
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM {ANIP)__
PHASE XVIII
~OT~ ANIp: ~ : :~ ~
GRAND TOT~ 125,000 .. 75,~0~)0_ : 75,000 %587,492: 2;959,000 t3;379,000
24
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Funding To Be Determined Total
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
STREETS
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
COMMON GREENS SIDE_WALK REPAIR PROGRAM 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
D_EL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION 42,000 100,000 400,000 -
EAST GRAND / DUBUQUE INTERSECTION 100,000
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 100,000
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION 548,000
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS 50,000
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFAClNG PROJ 180,000
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION 30,000
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION 600,000 2,000,000
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE 21,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION 57,000 250,000
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2004-2005 580,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION 22,000
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2004-2005 10,000 300,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD 516,000
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS 92,000 1,000,000
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE - 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR 176,577 1
:TOTAl.STREETS ~ . . 2,184,577 i 4,275,000 2,100,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 !,140,000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING - - 200,000 - - -
TOTS ~LRO~ CR0~SINGS ~ :-, ~
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT .................................... ~50,~000 50_,000 50,000 50,000_ 5~0,.~00()_
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN 55,00~ 55,000
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN 34,000 150,000
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR 136,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION 75,000 75,000 75,000
SWIFT AVENUE / MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN 75,000 75,000 !
~OI'~STORM DRAINS 295,000 : 280,000 305,000 175,000 i00~000
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER 100,000
AIRPORT BLVD SEWER BYPASS, WET WEATHER, PH II 566,264 3,373,736
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 100,000
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR 100,000
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR 60,000 250,000 !
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., PH I/PRIOR I (WW, PH IV) 14,876,944
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER 75,000 225,000
LINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WET WEATHER, PH IV 79,597 7,333,000
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM 55,970 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT 100,000
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV. 1,500,000 1,500,000
PUMP STATION RENOVATION 70,333 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM 50,472 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II 550,000 .
STRUCTURAL REPAIR / SEWER REHAB IMPROV. 500,000 500,000 500,000 I 500,000
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION 106,862
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I 18,388,563
WINSTON MANOR SEWER, WET WEATHER, PH Il 100,000 326,000 - -
~OTAI-SEW_ER : ~. 33,728,7~4.1 10,484~64 6,264i~6 S~,000 ]
25
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Funding To Be Delermined Total
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 05-09
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 500,000
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM 7,687
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 18,000 24,000 24,000 ! 24,000 24,000
CITY FACILITY ! BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION 100,000 400,000 400,000
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS 75,000 75,000
DAY CARE FACILITY 498,044
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL J UPGRADE 76,092 20,000 100,000 100,000 50,000
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS 35,000 35,000
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,382
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION 3,000,000 3,500,000 1,000,000
MSB WALL LEAKS 25,000
NEW CITY PARKING LOT 300,000
NEW LIBRARY 30,000,000 30,000,000
NEW FIRE STAT NO. 61, ADMIN OFF & TRAINING FAC 1,000,000
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION 329,427
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
ROOF INSTALLATION 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000
TRAIN STATION STUDY 75,000
i 100,000 - - 100,000 - - -
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION L 210,000
; .;, TOT~ PUBUC UTILITIES,,
PARKS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM - - 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 80,000
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS 50,000
LINEAR PARK TRAIL 417,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
VARIOUS CiTY GREEN SPOTS 9,650 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT 26,800 - - -
; ; TOT~PARKS :; :~ ; ; ~: ,- ; - ; 236i450 3,100i000 3~100~000 100,000
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE 947,000
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE 349,000
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE 785,000
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES 333,000
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS 18,000
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL ................................................. 40,~_ 4~0.!000~
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD 421,000
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE 1,265,000
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL 75,000
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE 1,609,000
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 270,000
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR 217,000
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL 594,000
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD 609,000
GRAND / EAST GRAND 565,000
HARBOR WAY 2,721,000
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT 45,000
HIGHWAY 101 /PRODUCE SIGNAL 183,000
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNA~L - _ ..... 150,000
26
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Funding To Be Determined Total
Est. Avail Est. Avail
PROJECT NAME Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Prior Year FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ............................ 40,000 40,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 i 80,~
MITCHELL AVENUE 1,942,000
MUTCD UPDATE 100.000 100,000
OPTICOM SYSTEM 50,000
SIGN INVENTORY 50.000 50,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP 1,386,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD 1.946,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE 302,000
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR 180,000
TOTALTRAFFIC . 50,000 100,000 ; . 642,000 355,000 2.984,000 180,000 645,000 13,710,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE 40.4,00 30.000 ,, , 25,000 , 25 000 25,000
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) 39,000 50,000
FINANCIAL/HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE 700,000 , 700,000
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I 56,000 50.000 50.0(X) 50,000
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT -, 10,000 ,10,000 10000 ,, 10000
LASER FICHE, PHASE II 15,000 15,000
PE__RMITTING PROJECT, R & D -, , , ,10,000 10,000; .
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM 25,000 5,000
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE 190,295 341,159 ....
~OTAL i~O~MATI0N TECHNOLOGY ~ __ 700.000 85.000
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM {ANIP)
PHASE XVIII 1,187,600
~ ' 960,000 30,000~000 44~121,695 22~860,423_ 18,337,736 5,689~000 : 3,3i9,000 46,224,000
27
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NOTES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE NEW
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR APPROPRIATION
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
Column 9
Column 10
Column 11
Provides a reference number for all projects within a specific category and does not necessarily indicate the order in which
the project will be undertaken.
Project Name & Number refers to the Engineering Division name and number designation for current project underway.
The numbers in parenthesis are the Finance Depadment account numbers.
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2006-2007,
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2008-2009.
The soumes of funds,
Prior year's funding approved for this project,
Prior year's funding available (unused) for the project.
Funding request for the current fiscal year.
28
1A. U.S. 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
lB. US 101 OFF KAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
2. 2004-2005 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
3. 2004-2005 STREET SLURRY SEAL
4. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
5. SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GILa. DE SEPARATION
6. OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
7. DEL MONTE AVENUE ILEHABILITATION
STREETS
8. PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
9. WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
10. COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
11. ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
12. GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
13. WEST ORANGE AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
14. GUARD RAIL INSTALLATION
15. EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
MAJOR STREET PROJECTS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. lA - U.S. 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
THIS PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHBOUND FLYOVER FROM HIGHWAY 101 TO EASTBOUND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD AS THE NEXT PHASE
TO THE OYSTER POINT INTERCHANGE.
ITEM NO. lB - US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
THE PROJECT WILL ADD AN ADDITIONAL SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMP AND ON-RAMP RECOMMENDED IN EAST OF 101 STUDY, POLICY CIR-3.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1Major Street Project
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MAJOR STREET PROJECTS
1
ITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECTNAME&NUMBER
IA U.S. 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD 516,000
(50-13231-9715)
lB US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS 1,092,000
(50-13231-9710)
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR
UTL
B
GR
APPROPRIATI
4,153,500 516,000
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
UTL
B
DP
1,368,500 92,000
I TOTAL 1,608,000 0 0 0 0 5,522,000 608,000
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
UTL = UT L TIES REIMBURSEMENT B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
ON
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
STREETS- PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - EAST GRAND/DUBUqUE INTERSECTION
THE PROJECT WILL MODIFY THE EXISTING INTERSECTION TO ACCOMMODATE TRUCK TRAFFIC.
ITEM NO. 2 - 2004-2005 RESURFACING PROGRAM
THE PROJECT WILL RESURFACE VARIOUS CITY STREETS IN THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 3 - 2004-2005 STREET SLURRY SEAL
THE PROJECT WILL INVOLVE THE DIG-OUTS AND SLURRY SEALING OF RESIDENTIAL STREETS IN THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 4 - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
THE PROJECT WILL UPDATE ALL THE RESIDENTIAL PAVEMENT DISTRESS SURVEY TO QUALIFY TO MTC FUNDS FOR FUTURE
ROAD RESURFACING PROJECTS. AND INTERGRATE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DATA WITH THE ARCMAP SOFTWARE.
ITEM NO. 5 - SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION
THIS PROJECT WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDIES ON THE SOUTH LINDEN GRADE SEPARATION, PRODUCE
AVENUE EXIT RAMP AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD/GRAND AVENUE INTERSECTION.
ITEM NO. 6 - OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
THIS PROJECT WILL STUDY THE EXTENSION OF OAK AVENUE FROM MISSION ROAD TO EL CAMtNO REAL. FUNDING IS
FROM THE EL CAMINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
ITEM NO. 7 - DEL MONTE AVENUE REHABILITATION
THE PROJECT WILL PREPARE THE PS & E FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DEL MONTE AVENUE FROM ROMNEY AVENUE
TO ARROYO DRIVE.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Streets
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREETS
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
EAST GRAND/DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
ST-00-4 (51-13231-0001 )
2004-2005 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
(51-13231-0501 )
2004-2005 STREET SLURRY SEAL
ST-03-3 (51-13231-0403)
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
ST-99-3 (51-13231-9913)
PROJECT COSTS
SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION
ST-03-6 (51 ~13231-0401 )
100,000
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
ST-02-6 (51-13231-0301 )
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 3,000,000)
580,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000
DEL MONTE AVENUE REHABILITATION
ST-02-7 (51-13231-0302)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 858,000)
310,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
41,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
22,000
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE iiiiiii!ii!i!iii!!iiN~Wli!:!i!!ii!iiii!iJ
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR i!!iA~p~O~R ATIONJ
2,600,000
142,000 400,000
APPROPRIATION
MA 175,000 10,000
MA 20,000 20,000 iiiiiii!j!iillt~!i
GT 58,000 42,000
3,695,000 1,490,000 990,000 990,000 990,000
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
OA = OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS (COLMA & SMC)
B = BONDS
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
OPT = ORANGE PARK TRUST FUND
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
STREETS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 8 - PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
THE PROJECT WILL PREPARE THE PS & E FOR THE REHABILITATION OF PINEHURST WAY FROM HAZELWOOD TO ROCKWOOD.
ITEM NO. 9 - WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
THE PROJECT WILL UPGRADE ALL FEEDER LIGHTING CIRCUITS, WIRINGS, FIXTURES, LINES AND EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE
WESTBOROUGH NEIGHBORHOOD AREA.
ITEM NO. 10 - COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
THE PROJECT WILL REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE COMMON GREENS.
ITEM NO. 11 - ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
THE PROJECT WILL REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED SIDEWALK IN THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 12 - GREENDALE DRIVE REHABILITATION
THE PROJECT WILL RESURFACE GREENDALE AVENUE WHICH START AND END TO CALLAN BOULEVARD.
ITEM NO. 13- WEST ORANGE AVENUE iNTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
THE PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT NEW LIGHTED CROSSWALKS, NEW ISLANDS AND BEAUTIFICATION ENHANCEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION
OF WEST ORANGE AND MEMORIAL DRIVE.
ITEM NO. 14 - GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
THE PROJECT WILL INSTALL GUARD RAIL AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS NEEDED, SUCH AS JUNIPERO SERRA
BOULEVARD, RAILROAD AVENUE AND HICKEY BOULEVARD.
ITEM NO. 15 - EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL A RETAINING WALL ON EL CORTEZ DRIVE TO PREVENT EROSION ONTO THE ROADWAY SURFACE.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2 - Streets
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREETS
1
IITEM NO.
10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME& NUMBER
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
(51-13231-0303)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 410,000)
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
(51-13231-0505)
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13231-0307)
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13231-0308)
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
57,000 250,000
100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
12 GREENDALE DRIVE REHABILITATION 548,000
(51-13231-0402)
13 WEST ORANGE AVENUE INTERSECTION 176,577
IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13231-0316)
14 GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS 50,000
(51-13231-0502)
15 EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 100,000
(51-13231-0508)
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE ~,!;ri ; !! ! ! ! ii! ~ !i!!!!! ii !iilI
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR 'APPROPRIATION;I
GT
APPROPRIATI
60,000 57,000
GT
CG 75,000 75,000
CI 25,000 25,000
RDA
GT 202,000 202,000
MA 346,000 346,000
GR 100,000 100,000
PROP 12 420 420
MA 42,807 42,807
OPT 33,350 33,350
MA
MA
I PAGE SUBTOTAL 1,156,577 400,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 884,577 881,577
I -rOyAL 4,851,577 1,8 0,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 2,162,577 1,576,577
ICI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
OA = OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS (COLMA & SMC) GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
B = BONDS CG = COMMON GREENS FUND OPT = ORANGE PARK TRUST FUND
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
STREETS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 16 - HUNTINGTON AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
THE PROJECT WILL RESURFACE HUNTINGTON AVENUE (SPRUCE AVENUE-CITY LIMITS AT NOOR AVENUE) TO IMPROVE ROADWAY SURFACE.
ITEM NO. 17 - MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
THE PROJECT WILL PREPARE THE PS & E FOR THE REHABILITATION OF MITCHELL AVENUE FROM HARBOR WAY TO SOUTH AIRPORT
BOULEVARD.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 3 - Streets
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1
ITEM NO.
STREETS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
16 HUNTINGTON AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
17 MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
PAGE SUBTOTAL
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
180,000
30,000
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR
MA
GT
GT
MA
APPROPRIATI
0 210,000 0 0 0
ON
TOTAL
4,851,577 2,100,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 1,140,000
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
OA = OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS (COLMA & SMC)
B = BONDS
GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX
SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTVv' = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
OPT = ORANGE PARK TRUST FUND
g:/cip 04105/cip-fy 04-05
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
I.GATEWAY BOULEVARD RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENT
RAILROAD CROSSING - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - GATEWAY BOULEVARD CROSSING
THE PROJECT WILL IMPROVE THE CROSSING BY INSTALLING A CONCRETE/RUBBER CROSSING TO PROVIDE A SMOOTHER LOWER MAINTENANCE SURFACING FOR
VEHICLES.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - RR XING
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR ~ii[Al~ .P,~I~iA,~I~I'~i !!
PROJECT COSTS
1 GATEWAY BOULEVARD 200,000
(51-13231-9716)
GT
A P P R O P R I AT I O N
J TOTAL 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0
ICI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS: CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip fy 04-05
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
2. BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
t. ARCH CU1 VERI RI:PIAf'I(MI(NI
4. MASIER PI.AN/IMI~I.I(MI~NI'AIlON
SI'ORM [)RAINS
5 SWIFI AVI{NI~I~/MICIII~LL[~ COURT STORM DRAINS
6. AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAINS
// /
STORM DRAINS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIRS
THE PROJECT WILL CORRECT MINOR STORM DRAIN PROBLEMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 2 o BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
THIS PROJECT WILL EXAMINE THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM ON BEACON STREET AND PROPOSE POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO PREVENT FLOODING.
ITEM NO. 3 - ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
THE NEW PROJECT WILL REPLACE THE EXISTING ARCH CULVERT SYSTEMS AT THE INTERSECTIONS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA
WITH NEW CATCHBASINS.
ITEM NO. 4 - STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
A STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN WILL EVALUATE THE CITY'S STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AND IDENTIFY DEFICIENCIES TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM,
DEFINE A RANGE OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS, PROPOSE A FINANCING PLAN, AND PROVIDE IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CIP.
ITEM NO, 5 - SWIFT AVENUF-_.JMICHELLE COURT
THE PROJECT WILL EVALUATE THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM ON SWIFT AVENUE AND MICHELLE COURT AND INSTALL A CHECK VALVE AND/OR
LINER IN THE SYSTEM.
ITEM NO. 6 - AVALON DRIVE
THE PROJECT WILL INSTALL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON AVALON DRIVE FROM GRANADA DRIVE TO CONSTITUTION WAY.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Storm Drain
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STORM DRAINS
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
(51-13231-9916)
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
(51-13231-0008)
3 ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
(51-13231-0014)
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
(51-13231-0310)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 525,000)
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
SWIFT AVENUE/MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAINS
(51-13231-0503)
PROJECT COSTS
136,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
6 AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAINS
(51-13231-0504)
184,000
TOTAL
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
75,000 75,000 75,000
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR ~'.APPROPRIATIONI
GT 86,000
SW 50,000
MA 36,000
GT 50,000
SW 75,000
MA
75,000 75,000
APPROPRIATION
55,000 55,000
575,000 305,000 175,000 100,000 100,000
MA
Cl= CAPITALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA= MEASURE A
GT=GASTAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD= PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip O4-05/form_cip fy 04-05
1. WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
2. PUMP STATION RENOVATION
3. MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
4. SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION
SANITARY SEWER
5. BLOWER BUILDING AIR. CONDITIONING
6. WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
7. EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
8. SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL
PLANT AND PUMP STAIlONS
9. AIRPORT BOULEVARD SEWER BYPASS
10. OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
12. WINSTON MANOR SEWER REPAIR
13. 'A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
14. CALIFORNIA AVENUE SEWER REPAIR
15. EAST HAP. RIS SEWER REPAIR
16. FRANCISCO DRIVESEWER
17. PUMP STATION #3 AND SWIFTAVENUE SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1- WATER (~UALtTY (~ONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
THIS PROJECT UPGRADED THE TREATMENT PLANT.
ITEM NO. 2 - PUMP STATION RENOVATION
THIS PROJECT WILL CONTINUE THE REHABILITATION AND UPGRADING OF THE CITY'S PUMPING STATIONS TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING PUMP
FACILITIES CAN ADEQUATELY TRANSPORT THE CITY'S WASTEWATER FLOWS.
ITEM NO. 3 - MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
THiS PROGRAM WILL REPAIR OLD BRICK CONSTRUCTED MANHOLES THAT HAVE DAMAGED BOTTOMS OR HAVE SEVERE INFLOW PROBLEMS.
TYPICALLY, LINING OR COATING OF THE INTERIOR BARREL IS REQUIRED. LOCATIONS ARE LIMITED TO DOWNTOWN AREA ONLY.
ITEM NO. 4 - SANITARy SEWER INSPECTION
THIS PROGRAM WILL CONDUCT INLINE VIDEO INSPECTIONS TO DETERMINE THE STRUCTURAL AND ALIGNMENT CONDITION OF THE IN PLACE PIPE.
CAMERA REQUIREMENTS VARY AS DOES THE LENGTH OF THE RUNS. VIDEOS WILL HELP MAINTENANCE DETERMINE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT OPTIONS.
ITEM NO. 5 - BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING
THIS PROJECT WILL REPLACE TWO ROOF-MOUNTED SWAMP COOLERS THAT HAVE BECAME CORRODED AND HAVE NUMEROUS LEAKS.
ITEM NO. 6 - WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE I
THIS PROJECT CONSIST OF UPGRADING SAN MATEO PUMP STATION, NEW SHAW ROAD PUMP STATION, TWO ( 2 ) NEW SHAW ROAD
AND LOWRIE AVENUE FORCE MAINS PLUS STORAGE POND AND OTHER
E:NGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Sanitary Sewer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEWER
1
ITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
(71-13234-9742)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
(71-13235-0053)
FrY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
(71-13235-9751)
106,862
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION
(71-13235-0051)
PROJECT COSTS
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING
(71-13235-0251)
70,333 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE 1
SHAW ROAD PUMP STATION
SHAW ROAD FORCE MAIN
SAN MATEO PUMP STATION
LOWRIE AVENUE FORCE MAIN
EFFLUENT STORAGE BASIN/OTHER
(71-13235-0351 )
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 24,197,335)
55,970 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
50,472 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
FUNDING PRIOR YEAR AVAILABLE
METHOD PRIOR YEAR
SE 168,000
SE 76,160
SE 55,970
SE 85,543
APPROPRIATION
106,862
70,333
100,000
SE 100,000
18,388,563
18,772,200 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000
SE 11,000,000 18,388,563
B/L
11,485,673
CI= CAPtTALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
MA= MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUN[)
GTW =GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
SANITARY SEWER - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 7 - EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I/PRIORITY 1 (WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE IV)
THIS PROJECT CONSIST OF UPGRADING THE PUMP STATION # 4.
ITEM NO. 8 - SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WATER QUALITy CONTROL PLANT AND PUMP STATIONS (WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II)
THIS PROJECT WILL SEISMICALLY UPGRADE THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT AND ASSOCIATED PUMP STATIONS BASED UPON THE SEISMIC
VULNERABILITY OF THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM STUDY BY EARTH QUICK ENGINEERING.
ITEM NO. 9 ' AIRPORT BOULEVARD SEWER BYPASS/WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE II)
THIS PROJECT WiLL BE DONE UNDER WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II AND WILL EVALUATE THE EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM ON AIRPORT
BOULEVARD FROM CHAPMAN AVENUE TO ARMOUR AVENUE. THE EXISTING 8" LINE IS UNDER CAPACITY DURING PEAK STORM EVENTS. THiS
PROJECT WILL ANALYZE AND PRESENT VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES TO IMPROVING THE SYSTEM IN THE AREA.
ITEM NO. 10 - OUTFALL REPAIR pROJECT
THIS PROJECT WILL PERMANENTLY REPAIR THE CRACK IN THE OUTFALL LINE LEADING iNTO THE BAY.
ITEM NO. 11 - STRUCTURAL REPAIR/SEWER REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS_
THIS PROJECT WiLL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT VARIOUS REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE SANITARY SYSTEM.
($500,000/YEAR FOR NEXT 19 YEARS).
ITEM NO. 12 - WINSTON MANOR SEWER REPAIR (WET WEATHER PROGRAM - PHASE II)
THE SANITARY SEWER LINE WHICH STARTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF HICKEY BOULEVARD AND CAMARITAS AVENUE TO
EL CAMINO REAL HAS ROOT INTRUSION WHICH DAMAGED THE PIPE AND THE LINE HAS SE"FTLED. DUE TO POOR ACCESSIBILITY,
MAINTENANCE IS DIFFICULT. REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT IS REQUIRED. VARIOUS FORMS OF TRENCHLESS METHODS
WILL BE EVALUATED TO REPLACE THIS LINE.
ITEM NO. 13 - "A" STREET SANITARY SEWER
DURING WET WEATHER EVENTS, THE SANITARY LINE ON FIRST STREET SURCHARGES WHICH CAUSED OVERFLOWS IN THE
"A" STREET LINE. THIS PROJECT WILL iNCREASE LINE SIZES TO HANDLE THE FLOWS.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2 - Sanitary Sewer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEWER
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
7 EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 14,876,944
PHASE 1/PRIORITY 1
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE IV)
(71-13235-0352)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $15,000,000)
8 SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL 550,000
PLANT AND PUMP STATIONS
0NET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II)
(71-13235-0555)
AIRPORT BOULEVARD SEWER BYPASS
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE II)
(71-13235-0556)
566,264 3,373,736
10 OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT 100,000
(71-13235-0550)
STRUCTURAL REPAIR/SEWER REHABILITATION
IMPROVEMENTS
WINSTON MANOR SEWER REPAIR
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM, PHASE II)
(71-13235-0557)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
100,000 326,000
11
FUNDING
METHOD
B/L 13,100,000
DP 1,900,000
SE
B/L
SE
B/L
SE
SE
SE
;B/L
12
13 "A" STREET SANITARY SEWER 100,000
(71-13235-0551 )
SE
PAGE SUBTOTAL 16,293,208 4,199,736 500,000 500,000 500,000 15,000,000 14,876,944
PRIOR YEAR ;APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION
CI=CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP=DEVELOPERFEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
GR=GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B~=BONDS~OANS
MA= MEASUREA
GT= GASTAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04~05
SANITARY SEWER - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 14 - CALIFORNIA AVENUE SEWER REPAIR
THIS PROJECT Will REHABILITATE OR REPLACE THE LINE DEPENDING UPON EVALUATION OF THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE
SOLUTION.
ITEM NO. 15 - EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
THIS SEWER LINE BETWEEN HARBOR AND LAWRENCE AVENUES REQUIRES REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT DUE TO
DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT. SETTLEMENT REDUCES THE CAPACITY OF THE LINE AND INCREASES MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.
THE SEWER LINE WILL BE INSPECTED BY VIDEO TO ESTABLISH THE NEEDED WORK PRIOR TO FINAL DESIGN.
ITEM NO. 16 - FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
REHABILITATION OF A DETERIORATED AND SAGGED SEWER LINE WHICH REQUIRES CONTINUAL AND HEAVY MAINTENANCE
REQUIREMENTS. LINE SECTION STARTS FROM THE CORNER OF FRANCISCO DRIVE AND SONORA AVENUE AND ENDS 900 FEET
DOWN STREAM. THE LINE WILL BE RETURNED TO ITS PROPER GRADE.
ITEM NO 17 - PUMP STATION # 3 AND SWIFT AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
THIS PROJECT WILL UPGRADE SANITARY SEWER PUMP STATION NO. 3 AND CORRECT DEFICIENCIES IN THE SEWER LINE IN
SWIFT AVENUE.
ITEM NO. 18 - LINDENVILLE SEWER/STORM REHABILITATION {WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE V) THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF NEW STORMWATER INTERCEPTORS ALONG THE SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE, VICTORY AVENUE
AND SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE AND A NEW PUMP STATION.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 3 - Sanitary Sewer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEWER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
IITEM NO.
PROJECTNAME& NUMBER
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
14 CALIFORNIA AVENUE SEWER REPAIR 100,000
(71-13235-0552)
15 EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
(71-13235-0553)
16
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
(71-13235-0554)
PUMP STATION # 3 AND SWIFT AVENUE
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
(71-13235-0558)
PROJECT COSTS
60,000 250,000
75,000 225,000
METHOD PRIOR YEAR
SE
17
1,500,000 1,500,000
SE
SE
RDA
DP
18 LINDENVILLE SEWER/STORM REHABILITATION 7,412,597
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE V)
(71-13235-0455)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 8,030,000)
B/L 697,000
SE
PAGESUBTOTAL
9,147,597 1,975,000 0 0 0
APPROPRIATION
697,000
79,597
TOTAL
44,213,005 6,264,736 590,000 590,000 590,000
CI= CAPITALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B~=BONDS~OANS
MA=MEASUREA
GT= GAS TAX
CS= CITY SERVICESFUND
GTW =GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD= PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
PUBLIC FACILI'FIES
I.CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAIN'FFLNAN('E 6 traIN STA HON
2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM $11IDY '7 MSI~ WAI,I, I.FAKS
3. ROOF INSTALLATION ~. 1111 lf)NItOIFI, SIII
4. EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENF:UPGRAI)E 9, DAY CARE FACII.IHFS
5. INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUll. DINGS
15. MISCEI_.LANEOUS LAND AQUISITION
16 PAINTING OF CITY BUII,DINGS
18. NEW FIRE STATION NO, 61 ADMINISTRATION
OFFICES AND TRAINING FACILITY
22 NEW CITY PARKING LOT
10, OYSTI R POINF MARINA REMEDtA'FION
11 BICYCI E EOCKI~R RFtIABII,II'A HON PROGRAM
t2 SAN MA I EO tlf~/JSING PROJECT
13. AGENCY BUII.I)ING IMPROVEMENTS
PUBLIC FACILITIES - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAINTENANCE
THIS PROGRAM WILL ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ROOFS, PAINTING, WINDOW REPLACEMENTS, FLOOR TREATMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS
WORK AS NEEDED TO KEEP BUILDING IN SAFE AND HABITABLE CONDITION. PUBLIC COUNTER RECONFIGURATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT.
ITEM NO. 2 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
THIS PROJECT FUNDS PREPARATION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
ITEM NO. 3 - ROOF INSTALLATION
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL ROOFING AT VARIOUS CITY BUILDINGS AS NEEDED
ITEM NO. 4 - EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE PROGRAM
THIS PROGRAM WILL ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF UPDATED EQUIPMENT FOR THE GENERATION OF
EMERGENCY POWER FOR BUILDINGS DUE TO POWER OUTAGES. THIS YEAR A NEW GENERATOR WILL BE INSTALLED AT CORPORATION
YARD AND EXISTING GENERATOR AT CORPORATION YARD WILL BE INSTALLED AT FIRE STATION 64.
ITEM NO. 5 - INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL ADA RELATED ACCESS/USE IMPROVEMENTS TO VARIOUS BUILDING LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE
CITY AS NEEDED.
ITEM NO. 6 - TRAIN STATION
THIS PROJECT WILL STUDY THE EFFECTS THE TRAIN STATION RELOCATION WILL HAVE ON CITY FACILITIES AND IMPROVE THE
INTERFACE WITH CALTRAIN TO ENSURE THE NEEDS OF THE CITY, COMMUNITY AND BUSINESSES ARE MET.
ITEM NO. 7 - MSB WALL LEAKS
THIS PROJECT IS A CONTINUATION FROM WORK DONE IN PREVIOUS YEARS AND WILL SEAL GARAGE BASEMENT WALLS AND
PROVIDE PROPER DRAINAGE FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG ARROYO DRIVE. ONE PLANTER HAS BEEN SEALED.
ITEM NO. 8 - HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
THiS PROJECT WILL REMEDIATE THE LANDFILL BETWEEN GULL DRIVE AND MARINA BOULEVARD. TOXIC REMEDIATION,
METHANE BARRIERS AND MONITORING ARE PART OF THE PROJECT.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECTNAME&NUMBER
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
1 CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
(51-13232-0221 )
2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 18,000 24,000 24,000 24,000
(51-13232-0021)
24,000
3 ROOF INSTALLATION 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
(51-13232-0520)
4 EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE 96,092 100,000 100,000 50,000
PROGRAM (51-13232-0224)
5 INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
(51-13232-0524)
6 TRAIN STATION 75,000
(51-13232-0320)
7 MSB WALL LEAKS 25,000
(51-13232-0220)
8 HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,382
(51-13231-0015)
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR i!APPROPRIATION I
APPROPRIATI
CI 44,740 0
CI 6,000 0
GT 6,000 0
MA 6,000 0
SE 6,OO0 0
CI 0 0
CI 66,092 66,092
SE 10,000 10,000
CI 0 0
RDA 0 0
B 75,000 75,000
CI 25,000 25,000
CI 100,000 10,382
I PAGE SUBTOTAL 384,474 259,000 259,000 209,000 134,000 344,832 186,474
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
SWRP = SOLID WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAM B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
ON
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
PUBLIC FACILITIES - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 9 - DAY CARE FACILITIES
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE DAY CARE FACILITIES IN THE GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA, FUNDED BY 1999 GATEWAY
RDA BOND PROCEEDS.
ITEM NO. 10 - OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
THIS PROJECT WILL REMEDIATE CLAY CAP AT THE MARINA.
ITEM NO. 11 - BICYCLE LOCKER REHABILITATION PROGRAM
THIS PROGRAM WILL PROVIDE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EXISTING BICYCLE LOCKERS AT CITY HALL AND THE CORPORATION
YARD.
ITEM NO. 12 - SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HAS SEVERAL LOW-TO-MODERATE HOUSING PROJECTS WHICH THIS PROJECT WILL FUND.
ITEM NO. 13 - AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WILL REHABILITATE SEVERAL BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
ITEM NO. 14 - FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
THE PROJECT WILL REPAIR/REPLACE EXISTING STUCCO WALL ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND ON THE WALKWAY, EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PAINTING,
CABINETS, SANDBLAST AND POWDER COAT GATES, GAS PUMP, INSTALL SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INSTALL HOT WATER CIRCULATION
SYSTEM, CLEAN FURNACE AND DUCTS, TILE WORK.
ITEM NO. 15 - MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOCATE FUNDING FOR UNDESIGNATED LAND PURCHASES FOR HOUSING.
ITEM NO. 16 - PAINTING OF CITY BUILDING
PAINTING OF VARIOUS CITY BUILDINGS AS NEEDED.
ITEM NO. 17 - CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
THE PROJECT WILL STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF EXPANDING THE CITY HALL ANNEX BUILDING ON THE NEEDS OF BUILDING/FIRE PREVENTION,
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DIVISION.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2 - Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECTNAME& NUMBER
9 DAY CARE FACILITIES
(51-13232-0225)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 3,000,000)
10 OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
(51-13232-0410)
11 BICYCLE LOCKER REHABILITATION PROGRAM
(51-13232-0020)
12 SAN MATEO COUNTY HOUSING PROJECT
(51-13232-0450)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 3,500,000)
13 AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0451 )
14 FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
498,044
329,427
7,687
2,500,000
1,000,000
35,000
1,000,000
500,000
15 MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION 6,500,000
(51-13232-0452)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 7,500,000)
16 PAINTING OF CITY BUILDING 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
(51-13232-0522)
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE !!i~ ?,il ! UE~':!iiiii !!i! iill
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR ii APPROPRIATiON i~
APPROPRIATION
RDA/B 2,990,000 498,044 !'~!~;~:~[~;~[[~!~:~+~[~
SWRP 400,000 329,427
G R 10,000 7,687
RDA 1,000,000 1,000,000
RDA 500,000 500,000
RDA 3,000,000 3,000,000
17 CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
100,000 400,000 400,000
CI 0 0
CI
I PAGE SUBTOTAL 10,385,158 2,085,000 150,000 450,000 450,000 7,900,000 5,335,158
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
SWRP = SOL D WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAM B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
PUBLIC FACILITIES - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 18 - NEW FIRE STATION NO. 61 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES AND TRAINING FACILITY
THIS PROJECT WILL RENOVATE THE FACILITY ACQUIRED AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CANAL STREET AND SOUTH
SPRUCE AVENUE FOR FIRE STATION 61, ADMINISTRATION OFFICES AND A TRAINING FACILITY.
ITEM NO. 19 - WESTBOROUGH RECREATION CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING AT THE WESTBOROUGH CENTER TO KEEP THE BUILDING IN A MORE HABITABLE
CONDITION FOR THE VARIOUS USES.
ITEM NO. 20 - CITYWIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
THIS PROJECT WILL STUDY THE SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS.
ITEM NO. 21 - NEW LIBRARY
THIS PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT A NEW LIBRARY TO ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.
ITEM NO. 22 - NEW CITY PARKING LOT
THIS PROJECT WILL DEMOLISH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND CONVERT 178-190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD TO A CITY PARKING LOT.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 3 - Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
IITEM NO.
PROJECTNAME&NUMBER
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
18 NEW FIRE STATION NO. 61, ADMINISTRATION 1,000,000
OFFICES AND TRAINING FACILITY
(51-13232-9921)
19 WESTBOROUGH RECREATION CENTER HVAC 100,000
INSTALLATION
20 CITY~NIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
21 NEW LIBRARY
75,000
22 NEW CITY PARKING LOT 300,000
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR i?APPROPRIATtONI
APPROPRIATION
RDA 5,000,000 0
TBD
TBD
30,000,000 TBD
RDA
PAGE SUBTOTAL
1,300,000 175,000 0 0
30,000,000 5,000,000
TOTAL
12,069,632 2,519,000 409,000 659,000 30,584,000
CI= CAPITALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
SWRP= SOL D WASTE REDUCT ON PROGRAM
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA= MEASUREA
GT= GAS TAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW = GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD=PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
1, VARIOUS CiTY GREEN SPOTS
2. WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
3. LINEAR PARK TRAIL
4, GATEWAY BOULEVARD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
PARKS
5. COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION R/EPAIRPROGRAM
6. COMMON GREENS TREE REMED[ATION
7. EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
PARKS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
THIS PROJECT WOULD LANDSCAPE VARIOUS GREEN SPOTS AND MEDIAN ISLANDS AROUND THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 2- WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
THIS PROJECT WILL DESIGN NEW LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ON THE MEDIANS OF GELLERT BOULEVARD AND WESTBORQUGH BOULEVARD.
ITEM NO. 3- ~-INEAR PARK TRAII~
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, TO INCLUDE ENGINEERING FOR CIVIL, TRAFFIC, STRUCTURAL, AND GEOTECHNICAL; CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR
THREE SEGMENTS: ORANGE NORTH, SPRUCE TO ORANGE, HUNTINGTON TO SPRUCE; BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF THE LINEAR PARK. THIS WILL ALLOW TO PROGRESS ON CONSTRUCTION OF THE LINEAR PARK AS DEVELOPER FEES AND/OR
GRANT FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE.
ITEM NO. 4 - GATEWAY BOULEVARD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
THIS PROJECT WiLL PROVIDE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON GATEWAY BOULEVARD, NORTH OF THE GATEWAY/EAST GRAND INTERSECTION.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Parks
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
(51-13232-0116)
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
(51-13232-0117)
9,650 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
3 LINEAR PARK TRAIL
(51-13232-0523)
26,800
417,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
GATEWAY BOULEVARD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0032)
50,000
8 9 10 11
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR
Cl
CI 26,800
DP
~TW
APPROPRIATION
PAGE SUBTOTAL
503,450 3,050,000 3,050,000 50,000 50,000
CI= CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP= DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA= MEASUREA
GT=GASTAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW =GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
PARKS - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 5 - COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
THE PROJECT WILL REPAIR AND REPLACE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS/COMPONENTS WITHIN THE COMMON GREENS AS REQUIRED.
ITEM NO. 6 - COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
THE PROJECT WILL REMOVE, THIN, TRIM OR REPLACE NECESSARY TREES WITHIN THE COMMON GREENS
ITEM NO. 7 - EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
THIS PROJECT WILL DEVELOPE CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR IMPROVING AND BEAUTIFYING EL CAMINO REAL
WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2 - Parks
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS
1
ITEM NO,
PAGE SUBTOTAL
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13232-0321 )
COMMON GREENS TREE REMEDIATION
(51-13232-0322)
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0521 )
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
80,000
FUNDING
METHOD
CG
9 10 11
PRIOR AVAILABLE YEAR
YEAR PRIOR
APPROPRIATION
230,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
CG 75,000 75,000
RDA
150,000 150,000
TOTAL
733,450 3,100,000 3,100,000 100,000 100,000
Cl= CAPITALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB= SAN BRUNO SHARE
CG = COMMON GREENS ASSESSMENTS
GR=GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip-fy 04-05
1. CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
2. WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD/GELLERTAND
OLYMPIC DRIVE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
TRAFFIC
3. FORBES BOUI.EVARD/EC~:I,ES AVENUE 1KAFFIC SIGNAL
4. EL CAMINO REAL/ARLINGTON [)RIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
5 MISCEI,I,ANE()[~S TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
6. tlICKEY F~OtI[,EVARD INTERCONNECT
7. GATEWAY BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
8. OPTICOM SYSTEM
TRAFFIC - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - CITYWIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
DEVELOP A CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL TO STUDY TRAFFIC CONGESTION IN THE CITY.
ITEM NO. 2 - WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD/GELLERT AND OLYMPIC DRIVE IMPROVEMENTR
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE MARBELLA PROJECT.
ITEM NO. 3 - FORBES BOULEVARD/ECCLES AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAl,
INSTALL A NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF FORBES BOULEVARD AND ECCLES AVENUE.
ITEM NO. 4 - EL CAMINO REAL/ARLINGTON DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAl
CITY'S SHARE OF CALTRAN'S INSTALLED SIGNAL.
ITEM NO. 5 - MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
FUNDS MINOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS, TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AUDIBLE PEDESTRIAN UNITS
AT INTERSECTIONS, BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TDA PROJECTS.
ITEM NO. 6 - HICKEY BOULEVARD INTERCONNECT
INTERCONNECT SIGNALS ALONG HICKEY BOULEVARD BETWEEN JUNIPERO SERRA BOULEVARD AND EL CAMINO REAL.
ITEM NO. 7 - GATEWAY BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO. 8 - OPTICOM SYSTEM
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL OPTICOM SYSTEM (EMERGENCY VEHICLE ADVANCE WARNING SYSTEM) TO IMPROVE
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TIMES AND REDUCE INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS INVOLVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
ITEM NO. 9 - GRANDVIEW DRIVE/GRAND AVENUF
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - Traffic
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TRAFFIC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ITEM NO.
PROJECTNAME&NUMBER
I CITY~NIDE TRAFFIC MODEL 80,000
(51-13231-0312)
2 WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD/GELLERT AND 180,000
OLYMPIC DRIVE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
(51-13231-0506)
3 FORBES BOULEVARD/ECCLES AVENUE TRAFFIC 270,000
SIGNAL (51-13231-0210)
4 EL CAMINO REAL/ARLINGTON DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 75,000
(51-13231-0206)
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
5 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
(51-13231-0012)
6 HICKEY BOULEVARD INTERCONNECT 45,000
(51-13231-0507)
7 GATEWAY BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE 217,000
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
(51-13231-0400)
8 OPTICOM SYSTEM 50,000
(51-13231-0208)
9 GRANDVIEW DRIVE/GRAND AVENUE
594,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL 997,000 674,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR il ~!~!
APPROPRIATI
GT 80,000 40,000
DP 0 0
GT
MA 270,000 270,000
GT 65,000 65,000
RDA 10,000 10,000
GT 80,000 40,000
GT
TIF 217,000 217,000
110,000 0
832,000 642,000
GTW
TIF
Cl= CAPITALIMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
TDA = TRANSPORTAT ON DEVELOPMENT ACT
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA= MEASUREA
GT= GAS TAX
CS=CITYSERVICES FUND
GTW =GATEWAYASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD= PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip fy 04-05
TRAFFIC - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 10 - SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/UTAH AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO. 11 - AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MILLER AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL ADD ANOTHER LEFT TURN LANE ON THE OFF-RAMP.
ITEM NO. 12 - FORBES BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO. 13 - GRAND/EAST GRAND
THIS PROJECT WILL ADD AN ADDITIONAL RIGHT TURN LANE ONTO EAST-BOUND EAST GRAND AVENUE.
ITEM NO. 14 - AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND SAN MATEO AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH IN THE AREA.
ITEM NO. 15 - AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND GRAND AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WiLL ADD AN ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE AT GRAND AVENUE TO WESTBOUND EAST GRAND AVENUE.
ITEM NO. 16 - SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MITCHELL AVENUE AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH IN THE AREA.
ITEM NO. 17 - BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO. 18 - ECCLES AVENUE AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH,
ITEM NO. 19 - SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD HOOK RAMPS
THIS PROJECT WILL ADD AN ADDITIONAL RIGHT TURN LANE TO THE HOOK RAMPS.
ITEM NO.20 - DUBUQUE AVENUE/OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2- Traffic
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1
IITEM NO.
TRAFFIC
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 04-05
10 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/UTAH AVENUE
11 AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MILLER AVENUE
12 FORBES BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE
13 GRAND/EAST GRAND
14 AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND SAN MATED AVENUE
15 AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND GRAND AVENUE
16 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MITCHELL AVENUE
AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD
17 BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
18 ECCLES AVENUE AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
19 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD HOOK RAMPS
20 DUBUQUE AVENUE/OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-0g
565,000
TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
785,000 TIF
947,000 TIF
1,946,000 TIF
333,000
421,000 TIF
1,386,000 TIF
924,000 TIF
PROJECT COSTS
302,000
349,000
1,609,000
PRIOR
YEAR
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIATION
FUNDING
METHOD
PAGE SUBTOTAL 0 2,260,000 0 565,000 6,742,000 0 0 i;~!~[!~ ! i![ti!~i~!~!:!:i!~i:I h il~!~!:iI
Cl = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
TDA = TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip fy 04-05
TRAFFIC - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 21 - GULL DRIVE AND OYSTER POINT E, OUI-I~VARD
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE FROM GULL DRIVE TO OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD.
ITEM NO. 22 - DUBUCIUE AVENUE AND EAST GRAND AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE iNTERSECTiON IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO, 23 - MITCHELL AVENUE
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
ITEM NO. 24 - HARBOR WAY
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE ROAD~VAY IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE GROWTH.
iTEM NO. 25 - BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS AT EXISTING SIGNALS (9) WITHIN THE EAST OF 101 AREA,
iTEM NO. 26- LINDEN/PINE SIGNAL
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL A NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF LINDEN AND PINE AVENUE. CURRENTLY,
THERE iS AN ALL-WAY STOP,
!TEM NO. 27 - HIGHWAY 101 AND PRODUCE SIGNAL
THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT PRODUCE AND THE SOUTHBOUND HIGHWAY 101 OFF RAMP.
ITEM NO. 28- SIGN INVENTORY
THIS PROJECT WILL PURCHASE SOFTWARE AND IMPLEMENT SIGN INVENTORY IN PREPARATION FOR MUTCD UPDATE.
ITEM NO. 29 - MUTCD UPDATE
THIS PROJECT WILL UPDATE ALL CITY SiGNS/MARKINGS TO CURRENT STATE STANDARDS.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 3-Traffic
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TRAFFIC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11
IITEM PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 06-09
FUNDING
PRIOR
NO.
AVAILABLE
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATI
21 GULL DRIVE AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
22 DUBUQUE AVENUE AND EAST GRAND AVENUE
23 MITCHELL AVENUE
24 HARBOR WAY
25 BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
26 LiNDEN/PINE SIGNAL
27 HIGHWAY 101 AND PRODUCE SIGNAL
28 SIGN INVENTORY
29 MUTCD UPDATE
PAGESUBTOTAL
50,000
100,000
609,000
1,265,000
1,942,000
2,721,000
18,000
150,000
183,000
TIF
TIF
TIF
TIF
GT
GT
GT
0 50,000 100,000 0 6,888,000
0 0
ON
TOTAL
997,000 2,984,000 180,000 645,000 13,710,000
832,000 642,000
CI=CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP=DEVELOPER FEES
SB=SANBRUNOSHARE
TDA=TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
MA= MEASUREA
GT= GAS TAX
CS= CITYSERVICESFUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip fy 04-05
2. FIBER NETWORK(MFIS)
3. GIS PHASEI
INFORMATION TECilNOLOGY
4 I)I~AS~IER RE('OVERY PtANNING/PUR('IIASE 6. I!PGRADI! (TrY VOICE MAILSYS~EM
8. INTRANET-WEB PROJECq"
9. POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 1 - FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
THE PROJECT WILL REPLACE THE 18 YEARS OLD DOS BASED FINANCIAL SOFTWARE SYSTEM, AND WILL ACQUIRE A HUMAN RESOURCES
MODULE THAT INTERFACE WITH THE FINANCIAL AND PAYROLL SYSTEM. PROJECT IS CURRENTLY ON HOLD. THE FOLLOWING IS AVAILABLE FUNDING
FOR THIS PROJECT: REVELOPMENT AGENCY, SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND, COMMON GREENS FUND, BONDS, AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT,
AND SOLID WASTE
ITEM NO. 2 - FIBER NETWORK {MFIS)
THE PROJECT WILL BE FOR EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIBER OPTIC NETWORK. IT WOULD BE EXPECTED TO COMPLETE THE REMAINING WORK STARTED
BY RCN
ITEM NO. 3- GIS PHASE I THE PROJECT WOULD START THE BASE GIS FOUNDATION AND RELIABLE DATABASE THAT CAN BE INTEGRATED TO EXISTING CITY SOFTWARE, THE
RDA FUNDS ARE FROM THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATION BUDGET.
ITEM NO.4 - DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
THE PROJECT WILL IMPLEMENT A DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE CITY'S TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE, BUYING BACKUP AND FALL
OVER SYSTEMS. IMPLEMENTING AND TESTING EMERGENCY RECOVERY SCENARIOS.
ITEM NO, 5 - LASER FICHE PHASE II
THE PROJECT WILL ALLOW OTHER DEPARTMENTS TO USE THE LASER FICHE AND PURCHASE MORE LICENSES FOR EACH DEPARTMENT WHEN
NEEDED.
ITEM NO. 6 - UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
THE PROJECT WILL REPLACE/UPGRADE THE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - information Technology
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATI
I FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE 700,000
(51-16110-0240)
(PROJECT ON HOLD)
2 FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) 39,000 50,000
(51-16110-0122)
(PROJECT COST $104,000)
3 GIS PHASE I 56,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
(51-13232-0024)
(PROJECT COST $209,500)
4 DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE 70,400 25,000 25,000 25,000
(51-16110-0242)
(PROJECT COST $145,400)
5 LASER FISCHE PHASE II 15,000 15,000
(51-16110-0541 )
(PROJECT COST $30,000)
6 UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM 25,000 5,000
(51-16110-0540)
(PROJECT COST $50,000)
CI 14,000 14,000
SE 25,000 25,000
SE 1,000 1,000
CI 20,000 15,000
RDA 40,000 4O,000
Gl 40,400 40,400
CI
CS
CI=CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
ANIP=AIRCRAFTNOISEINSULATION PROJECT
CG=COMMON GREENSFUND
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
SWASTE = SOLID WASTE
MA= MEASURE A
GT=GASTAX
CS=CITYSERVICESFUND
GT~N= GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWERENTERPRISEFUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
ITEM NO. 7 - PERMITTING PROJECT, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
THE PROJECT WILL EVALUATE AND FUND THE PROCESS AND PLATFORM FOR THE PERMIT SYSTEM INFORMATION TO BE INPUTTED FROM THE
FIELD USING HAND HELD DEVICES FOR BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
ITEM NO. 8 - INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
THE PROJECT WILL REDESIGN THE WEBSITE USING VENDOR SOFTWARE FOR USE AND ACCESS BY BOTH CITY AGENCIES AND THE PUBLIC.
ITEM NO. 9 - POLICE (~AD/RM~; AND FIRE RM~ UPGRADE
UPGRADE THE COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH AND RECORD MANAGEMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 2 - Information Technology
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1
IITEM NO.
PAGE SUBTOTAL
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11
PROJECT NAME& NUMBER
FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
PERMITTING PROJECT, RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
(PROJECT COST $ 20,000)
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
(51-16110-0542)
(PROJECT COST $ 40,000)
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
(51-16110-0315)
(PROJECT COST $ 531,454)
10,000 10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
531,454
FUNDING
METHOD
CI
CI
CI
CS
GR
EQ
PRIOR AVAILABLE
YEAR PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIATI
66,000 66,000
124,295 124,295
190,295 190,295
541,454 20,000 20,000 10,000 0
TOTAL
746,854 865,000 95,000 85,000 0
330,695
325,695 ..........
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
ISB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
ICG = COMMON GREENS FUND
GR = GENERAL FUND MA = MEASURE A
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX
SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
ANIP = AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
EQ = EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
g:/cip 04-05/cip-fy 04-05
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION
I. PHASE XVIII
m
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
ITEM NO. 1 - PHASE XVIII
COVERS MULTI-FAMILY UNITS LOCATED IN BURl BURl AND THE CAMARITAS NEIGHBORHOOD.
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 Page 1 - ANIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
1
IITEM NO.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PHASE XVIII
(28-13240-9890)
PROJECT NAME& NUMBER
FY 04~05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09
PROJECT COSTS
1,187,600
FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE ,~!~,!!~!~
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR ~EI~
APPROPRIATION
SFIA 1,720,000 1,187,600
TOTAL
1,187,600 0 0 0 0
1,720,000 1,187,600
CI=CAPITALIMPROVEMENTFUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
SFIA=SAN FRANCISCOINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
GR = GRANTS
TIF=TRAFFICIMPACTFEE
SW =STORM WATER FUND
B=BONDS
MA= MEASUREA
GT= GASTAX
CS=CITYSERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
RDA=REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
SE=SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD=PARKING DISTRICT
PROP12=PROPOSITION12GRANTFUNDING
g:/cip 04-05/form_cip fy 04-05