The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-03-28 e-packet@7:00Wednesday, March 28, 2018 7:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA City Council Regular Meeting Agenda March 28, 2018City Council Regular Meeting Agenda PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. LIZA NORMANDY, Mayor KARYL MATSUMOTO, Mayor Pro Tempore RICHARD A. GARBARINO, Councilman MARK ADDIEGO, Councilman PRADEEP GUPTA, Councilman FRANK RISSO, City Treasurer KRISTA MARTINELLI, City Clerk MIKE FUTRELL, City Manager JASON ROSENBERG, City Attorney PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018 March 28, 2018City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a proclamation recognizing and celebrating National Library Week on April 8 - 14, 2018, with the theme, “Libraries Lead”. (Karyl Matsumoto, Mayor Pro Tempore) 1. Recognition of Judy Bush for being recognized as the Outstanding Volunteer of the Year, and of the City of South San Francisco Adult Day Care for being recognized as an Outstanding Program by the California Parks and Recreation Society, District IV. (Karyl Matsumoto, Mayor Pro Tempore) 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS/REQUESTS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Report regarding acceptance of the 2017 Housing Element Annual Progress Report. (Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner) 3. Report regarding a resolution approving a consulting services agreement with Fehr & Peers of San Francisco, California for the East of 101 Transportation Plan in an amount not to exceed $150,000, authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, and authorizing a total budget of $150,000. (Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner) 4. Resolution approving a consulting services agreement with Fehr & Peers of San Francisco, California for the East of 101 Transportation Plan in an amount not to exceed $150,000, authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, and authorizing a budget of $150,000. 4a. Report regarding a resolution accepting mid-year financial report and amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 adopted budget. (Richard Lee, Director of Finance) 5. Resolution accepting mid-year financial report and amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 adopted budget. 5a. Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018 March 28, 2018City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding a resolution approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Center as part of the Community Civic Campus Project for a six month term in an amount not to exceed $76,000, and approving budget amendment 18.027. (Deborah Gill, Special Projects Manager) 6. Resolution approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Center as part of the Community Civic Campus Project for a six month term in an amount not to exceed $76,000, and approving budget amendment 18.027. 6a. Report regarding a resolution approving an amendment to the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs to provide national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500, in a total not to exceed amount of $129,500, and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the current letter of engagement. (Mike Futrell, City Manager) 7. Resolution approving an amendment to the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs to provide national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500, in a total not to exceed amount of $129,500, and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the current letter of engagement. 7a. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion to approve the Minutes from the meeting of March 14, 2018.8. Motion confirming payment registers for March 28, 2018. (Richard Lee, Director of Finance) 9. Report regarding a motion to accept the construction improvements of the Alta Loma Park Renovation and Pathway Improvement Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications, with a total construction cost of $256,646. (Sam Bautista, Principal Engineer) 10. Report regarding a motion to accept the construction improvements of the Station Alert Package Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications, with a total construction cost of $142,685. (Sam Bautista, Principal Engineer) 11. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the South San Francisco Police Department to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment, volunteers and contractors, licensing or certification purposes. (Mike Rudis, Police Sergeant) 12. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018 March 28, 2018City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco approving an application for authorization to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment, volunteers, and contractors, licensing or certification purposes. 12a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra Boulevard near Westborough Boulevard. (Eunejune Kim, Director of Public Works) 13. Resolution authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra Boulevard near Westborough Boulevard. 13a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems, LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue. (Richard Walls, Emergency Medical Services Chief) 14. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems, LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue. 14a. Report regarding a Resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project to be granted to the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed to effectuate acceptance of the easement. (Sailesh Mehra, Planning Manager) 15. Resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project to be granted to the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed to effectuate acceptance of the easement. 15a. Report regarding adoption of an Ordinance Levying Special Tax within Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities). (Jason Rosenberg, City Attorney) 16. Ordinance levying special tax within the City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities). 16a. Report regarding adoption of an ordinance amending Title 20 (“Zoning) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code related to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.550 (Amendments to Zoning Ordinance and Map) 17. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018 March 28, 2018City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Ordinance amending the South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance, related to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District, in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.550 ("Amendments to Zoning Ordinance and Map") 17a. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL – COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Daniel Avictia v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ9497578 18. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: William Gablin v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ10106114, ADJ10317701, ADJ10828630 19. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Kenneth Hancock v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ10367800, ADJ10367798, ADJ10367803 20. Closed Session Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9) Significant Exposure to Litigation: One Case 21. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-179 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:1. Presentation of a proclamation recognizing and celebrating National Library Week on April 8 - 14, 2018, with the theme, “Libraries Lead”. (Karyl Matsumoto, Mayor Pro Tempore) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-188 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:2. Recognition of Judy Bush for being recognized as the Outstanding Volunteer of the Year, and of the City of South San Francisco Adult Day Care for being recognized as an Outstanding Program by the California Parks and Recreation Society, District IV. (Karyl Matsumoto, Mayor Pro Tempore) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-148 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding acceptance of the 2017 Housing Element Annual Progress Report.(Tony Rozzi,Principal Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion: 1.Accept the 2017 Housing Element Annual Progress Report; and 2.Authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). BACKGROUND California Government Code Section 65400 requires that an Annual Progress Report (APR)be prepared on the status and progress of implementation of the current Housing Element and be submitted to the City Council,the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR),and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)by April 1st of each year (with a 60 day grace period).The City intends to file the APR by the deadline.There is no similar requirement for other elements of the General Plan.Additionally,the APR has to be prepared in accordance with the provisions set forth by HCD and submitted online.The APR is included as Attachment 1. The Housing Element was updated for the 2015-2023 cycle and this APR represents the yearly update.The attached APR (Attachment 1)includes the following information about housing production since the start of the planning period in 2017 (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017): ·The types of housing units that were issued building permits (Tables A & A3); ·Information on the City’s progress in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement (Table B); ·Progress report on implementation of current Housing Element programs (Table C); and ·Update on how these programs remove governmental constraints to the maintenance,improvement and development of housing (Table C). The APR is informational only,and does not change adopted policies or authorize any action or expenditure of funds. Housing Element and Regional Planning California requires each jurisdiction to prepare a Housing Element as part of its General Plan in order to ensure that all jurisdictions are planning for the projected housing demand throughout the State.Unlike other elements of a General Plan,the Housing Element must be updated by deadlines set by the State.The process begins with City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-148 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:3. of a General Plan,the Housing Element must be updated by deadlines set by the State.The process begins with the State advising a region of their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA),which is the estimated number of housing units that will be needed over the planning period (1,864 units needed for South San Francisco).The Housing Element does not require that these units are built during the allocation cycle.The Housing Element only requires that a City have zoning in place to ensure that the RHNA allocation can be constructed on adequate sites with permissible zoning regulations. Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Summary The City issued 368 building permits for new residential units.This is the first year the City has issued permits for very low income levels -the Rotary Senior Housing project at 300 Miller Avenue will provide 80 rental units for low-income seniors and one above-moderate rental unit for the complex manager.Additionally,the City issued building permits for the Sares Regis Cadence project (Phase I),which will provide 260 market-rate rental units.The remaining building permits were issued for a combination of new duplexes,additional units on existing buildings,and accessory dwelling units (second units/in-law units)on existing single family homes. This upward trend in permit issuance is promising and at the close of 2017,the City issued building permits for 28 percent of the expected housing units for the City (515 units out of 1,864 units allocated through RHNA). Program Implementation Status Table C of the APR reports on the status of implementation of current Housing Element programs.Most programs are implemented and monitored on an ongoing basis,however,some programs have deliverable dates prior to the end of the Housing Element cycle of 2023.One program that has been due since the end of 2015 was Program 3-4B -Examine Displacement of Affordable Housing and Lower-Income Households.The City participates in the 21 Elements umbrella organization for housing efforts for San Mateo County.This partnership has resulted in a draft report on displacement shared with the consortium in February 2018 for consideration, comments, and a final draft for public review. FUNDING Submittal of the Annual Progress Report to HCD will have no financial impact on the City,but does continue to make the City eligible for regional grant funding. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council,by motion,accept the 2017 Housing Element Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Attachment: 1.Annual Element Progress Report City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d Pu r s u a n t t o G C 6 5 4 0 0 l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s m u s t p r o v i d e b y A p r i l 1 o f e a c h y e a r t h e a n n u a l r e p o r t f o r t h e p r e v i o u s ca l e n d a r y e a r t o t h e l e g i s l a t i v e b o d y , t h e O f f i c e o f P l a n n i n g a n d R e s e a r c h ( O P R ) , a n d t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f H o u s i n g an d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ( H C D ) . B y c h e c k i n g t h e “ F i n a l ” b u t t o n a n d c l i c k i n g t h e “ S u b m i t ” b u t t o n , y o u h a v e su b m i t t e d t h e h o u s i n g p o r t i o n o f y o u r a n n u a l r e p o r t t o H C D o n l y . O n c e f i n a l i z e d , t h e r e p o r t w i l l n o l o n g e r b e av a i l a b l e f o r e d i t i n g . Th e r e p o r t m u s t b e p r i n t e d a n d s u b m i t t e d a l o n g w i t h y o u r g e n e r a l p l a n r e p o r t d i r e c t l y t o O P R a t t h e a d d r e s s li s t e d b e l o w : G o v e r n o r ’ s O f f i c e o f P l a n n i n g a n d R e s e a r c h P . O . B o x 3 0 4 4 S a c r a m e n t o , C A 9 5 8 1 2 - 3 0 4 4 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 30 0 M i l l e r A v e - R o t a r y 5+ Re n t e r 80 0 0 1 81 81 Se c t i o n 8 Pr o j e c t - Ba s e d Re n t a l As s i s t a n c e , Lo w I n c o m e Ho u s i n g T a x Cr e d i t s , Re d e v e l o p m en t A g e n c y or Su c c e s s o r Ag e n c y Fu n d s DB N/A 5 28 3 - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d Af f o r d a b i l i t y b y H o u s e h o l d I n c o m e s Ve r y L o w - In c o m e Pr o j e c t I d e n t i f i e r (m a y b e A P N N o . , p r o j e c t n a m e o r ad d r e s s ) Un i t Ca t e g o r y Note below the number of units determined to b e a f f o r d a b l e w i t h o u t f i n a n c i a l o r d e e d re s t r i c t i o n s a n d a t t a c h a n e x p l a n a t i o n h o w th e j u r i s d i c t i o n d e t e r m i n e d t h e u n i t s w e r e af f o r d a b l e . R e f e r t o i n s t r u c t i o n s . 8Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions 4 Ta b l e A 5a Ho u s i n g w i t h F i n a n c i a l As s i s t a n c e a n d / o r De e d R e s t r i c t i o n s 67 Ho u s i n g D e v e l o p m e n t I n f o r m a t i o n 5 3 Lo w - In c o m e Mo d e r a t e - In c o m e Ab o v e Mo d e r a t e - In c o m e To t a l U n i t s pe r Pr o j e c t 1 Te n u r e R= R e n t e r O= O w n e r 2 De e d Re s t r i c t e d Un i t s Es t . # I n f i l l Un i t s * Se e In s t r u c t i o n s Se e In s t r u c t i o n s As s i s t a n c e Pr o g r a m s fo r E a c h De v e l o p m e n t An n u a l B u i l d i n g A c t i v i t y R e p o r t S u m m a r y - N e w C o n s t r u c t i o n Ve r y L o w - , L o w - , a n d M i x e d - I n c o m e M u l t i f a m i l y P r o j e c t s SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 (9 ) T o t a l o f M o d e r a t e a n d A b o v e M o d e r a t e f r o m T a b l e A 3 (1 0 ) T o t a l b y I n c o m e T a b l e A / A 3 80 0 5 28 3 (1 1 ) T o t a l E x t r e m e l y L o w - I n c o m e Un i t s * 9 * N o t e : T h e s e f i e l d s a r e v o l u n t a r y - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d (3 ) A c q u i s i t i o n o f U n i t s (2 ) P r e s e r v a t i o n o f U n i t s A t - R i s k (5 ) T o t a l U n i t s b y I n c o m e Ac t i v i t y T y p e Ve r y L o w - In c o m e An n u a l B u i l d i n g A c t i v i t y R e p o r t S u m m a r y - U n i t s R e h a b i l i t a t e d , P r e s e r v e d a n d A c q u i r e d p u r s u a n t to G C S e c t i o n 6 5 5 8 3 . 1 ( c ) ( 1 ) (1 ) R e h a b i l i t a t i o n A c t i v i t y Af f o r d a b i l i t y b y H o u s e h o l d I n c o m e s Pl e a s e n o t e : U n i t s m a y o n l y b e c r e d i t e d t o t h e t a b l e b e l o w w h e n a j u r i s d i c t i o n h a s i n c l u d e d a p r o g r a m i t i t s h o u s i n g e l e m e n t to r e h a b i l i t a t e , pr e s e r v e o r a c q u i r e u n i t s t o a c c o m m o d a t e a p o r t i o n o f i t s R H N A w h i c h m e e t t h e s p e c i f i c c r i t e r i a a s o u t l i n e d i n G C S e c t i o n 6 5 5 8 3 . 1(c)(1) Lo w - In c o m e Ta b l e A 2 * N o t e : T h i s f i e l d i s v o l u n t a r y (4 ) T h e D e s c r i p t i o n s h o u l d a d e q u a t e l y d o c u m e n t h o w e a c h u n i t c o m p l i e s w i t h su b s e c t i o n ( c ) ( 7 ) o f G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 6 5 5 8 3 . 1 TO T A L UN I T S Ex t r e m e l y Lo w - In c o m e * SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 0 - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d 6. Total No . o f U n i t s P e r m i t t e d fo r Ab o v e M o d e r a t e 1. Si n g l e F a m i l y No . o f U n i t s P e r m i t t e d fo r Mo d e r a t e 2 . 2 - 4 U n i t s 3 . 5+ U n i t s 7. Number of infill units* 5. Mo b i l e H o m e s An n u a l b u i l d i n g A c t i v i t y R e p o r t S u m m a r y f o r A b o v e M o d e r a t e - I n c o m e U n i t s (n o t i n c l u d i n g t h o s e u n i t s r e p o r t e d o n T a b l e A ) 4 . Se c o n d U n i t Ta b l e A 3 * N o t e : T h i s f i e l d i s v o l u n t a r y SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 0 0 0 5 0 55 1 13 26 8 0 0 282283 - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d Ye a r 8 Ye a r 7 Ye a r 5 Re g i o n a l H o u s i n g N e e d s A l l o c a t i o n P r o g r e s s Re m a i n i n g N e e d f o r R H N A P e r i o d ► ► ► ► ► Ye a r 1 Total Units to Date (a l l y e a r s ) Lo w No n - Re s t r i c t e d Ve r y L o w De e d Re s t r i c t e d No n - Re s t r i c t e d Ye a r 4 No t e : u n i t s s e r v i n g e x t r e m l y l o w - i n c o m e h o u s e h o l d s a r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e v e r y l o w - i n c o m e p e r m i t t e d u n i t s t o t a l s . To t a l U n i t s ► ► ► De e d Re s t r i c t e d En t e r C a l e n d a r Y e a r s t a r t i n g w i t h t h e f i r s t y e a r of t h e R H N A a l l o c a t i o n p e r i o d . S e e E x a m p l e . Ye a r 3 A b o v e M o d e r a t e M o d e r a t e Ye a r 2 Pe r m i t t e d U n i t s I s s u e d b y A f f o r d a b i l i t y RH N A Al l o c a t i o n b y In c o m e L e v e l Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level Ye a r 9 Ye a r 6 To t a l R H N A b y C O G . En t e r a l l o c a t i o n n u m b e r : In c o m e L e v e l Ta b l e B SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 56 5 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80485 28 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4277 31 3 10 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 28285 70 5 28 92 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 - 403302 18 6 4 41 10 6 36 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 515 1349 1- 2 B - I n c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g O r d i n a n c e R e v i e w Th e C i t y s h a l l p e r i o d i c a l l y r e v i e w t h e su c c e s s o f t h e I n c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g Or d i n a n c e , S S F M C 2 0 . 3 8 0 , t o d e t e r m i n e if t h e o b j e c t i v e s o f t h e o r d i n a n c e a r e be i n g m e t . C o n s i d e r a t i o n s h a l l b e m a d e to r e v i s i n g p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e o r d i n a n c e t o en s u r e t h a t a r a n g e o f h o u s i n g op p o r t u n i t i e s f o r a l l i d e n t i f i a b l e e c o n o m i c se g m e n t s o f t h e p o p u l a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g ho u s e h o l d s o f l o w - a n d mo d e r a t e i n c o m e s , a r e p r o v i d e d . 20 2 3 Th e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n a n d C i t y C o u n c i l v o t e d t o a m e n d S S F M C C h a p t e r 20 . 3 8 0 ( I n c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g R e g u l a t i o n s ) i n 2 0 1 6 t o e l i m i n a t e t h e 2 0 % af f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t f o r n e w c o n s t r u c t i o n o f r e n t a l p r o j e c t s co n s i s t i n g o f f o u r o r m o r e u n i t s w h e n r e c e i v i n g f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e f r o m t h e Ci t y f o r t h e s o l e p u r p o s e o f p r o v i d i n g o n - s i t e a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g u n i t s a s p a r t o f th e p r o j e c t . Th i s r e q u i r e m e n t m a d e i t d i f f i c u l t f o r t h e C i t y t o w o r k w i t h d e v e l o p e r s t o p r o v i d e a l i m i t e d n u m b e r o f a f f o r d a b l e u n i t s i n t h e i r p r o j e c t s b e c a u s e a n y a m o u n t o f Ci t y a s s i s t a n c e w o u l d t r i g g e r t h e 2 0 % r e q u i r e m e n t . M a k i n g t h i s s e c t i o n m o r e fl e x i b l e a l l o w s t h e C i t y t o s u b s i d i z e a l o w e r n u m b e r o f u n i t s w i t h o u t t r i g g e r i n g th e 2 0 % r e q u i r e m e n t . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , i n 2 0 1 8 s t a f f w i l l s t u d y a n d s h a r e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s w i t h t h e C i t y Co u n c i l f o r a c h a n g e t o t h e i n c l u s i o n a r y h o u s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h As s e m b l y B i l l 1 5 0 5 . 4- 2 A - A d m i n i s t e r M i n i m u m B u i l d i n g S e c u r i t y S t a n d a r d s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o a d m i n i s t e r Ch a p t e r 1 5 . 4 8 , M i n i m u m B u i l d i n g S e c u r i t y 20 2 3 Th e E c o n o m i c a n d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t ' s p r o j e c t r e v i e w , en t i t l e m e n t , a n d b u i l d i n g p e r m i t p r o c e s s e s e n s u r e t h a t C h a p t e r 1 5 . 4 8 i s - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d Pr o g r a m D e s c r i p t i o n (B y H o u s i n g E l e m e n t P r o g r a m N a m e s ) Ho u s i n g P r o g r a m s P r o g r e s s R e p o r t - G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 6 5 5 8 3 . De s c r i b e p r o g r e s s o f a l l p r o g r a m s i n c l u d i n g l o c a l e f f o r t s t o r e m o v e g o v e r n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s t o t h e ma i n t e n a n c e , i m p r o v e m e n t , a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f h o u s i n g a s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e h o u s i n g e l e m e n t . Na m e o f P r o g r a m O b j e c t i v e Ti m e f r a m e in H . E . St a t u s o f P r o g r a m I m p l e m e n t a t i o n Pr o g r a m I m p l e m e n t a t i o n S t a t u s Ta b l e C SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 St a n d a r d s , o f t h e M u n i c i p a l C o d e b y co n t i n u i n g t o r o u t e a l l n e w d e v e l o p m e n t ap p l i c a t i o n s a n d a d d i t i o n s to b o t h t h e P o l i c e a n d F i r e D e p a r t m e n t s to e n s u r e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e c o d e a n d to en s u r e t h a t s e c u r i t y m e a s u r e s a r e co n s i d e r e d d u r i n g t h e d e s i g n p r o c e s s . ad m i n i s t e r e d a n d a p p l i e d t o a l l n e w d e v e l o p m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n s a n d a d d i t i o n s . 4- 3 A - E n s u r e t h a t a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r n e w r e s i d e n t i a l l a n d us e s p r o p o s e d w i t h i n t h e 6 5 t o 6 9 C N E L a i r c r a f t n o i s e co n t o u r i n c l u d e a n a c o u s t i c a l s t u d y Th e C i t y s h a l l r e q u i r e t h a t t h e a c o u s t i c a l st u d y b e p r e p a r e d b y a p r o f e s s i o n a l ac o u s t i c e n g i n e e r a n d s p e c i f y t h e ap p r o p r i a t e n o i s e m i t i g a t i o n f e a t u r e s t o b e in c l u d e d i n t h e d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f th e n e w u n i t s , t o a c h i e v e a n i n t e r i o r n o i s e le v e l o f n o t m o r e t h a n 4 5 d B , b a s e d o n me a s u r e d a i r c r a f t n o i s e e v e n t s a t t h e l a n d us e l o c a t i o n . 20 2 3 Al l n e w a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t a r e r e v i e w e d c o n s i s t e n t w i t h th e S F O A i r p o r t L a n d U s e C o m p a t i b i l i t y P l a n ( A L U C P ) a n d a d o p t e d M u n i c i p a l Co d e r e g u l a t i o n s . N e w r e s i d e n t i a l p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e 7 0 + d B C N E L a r e a s a r e no t c u r r e n t l y p e r m i t t e d a n d n e w r e s i d e n t i a l p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e 6 5 t o 6 9 d B CN E L n o i s e c o n t o u r s r e q u i r e a c o u s t i c s t u d i e s . 5- 1 A - D e n s i t y B o n u s f o r S e n i o r H o u s i n g Th e C i t y s h a l l i n c l u d e d e n s i t y b o n u s in c e n t i v e s s p e c i f i c a l l y t a r g e t e d f o r s e n i o r ho u s i n g p r o j e c t s a n d p e r m i t r e d u c e d pa r k i n g s t a n d a r d s . 20 2 3 A p r o j e c t f o r 8 0 u n i t s a v a i l a b l e t o l o w - i n c o m e s e n i o r s w a s i s s u e d a b u i l d i n g pe r m i t i n 2 0 1 7 . D e n s i t y b o n u s i n c e n t i v e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e p r o j e c t d u r i n g en t i t l e m e n t s t a g e . 5- 1 B - R e d u c e d P a r k i n g R e q u i r e m e n t f o r B o a r d a n d Ca r e F a c i l i t i e s En c o u r a g e d e v e l o p m e n t o f r e s i d e n t i a l bo a r d a n d c a r e f a c i l i t i e s f o r s e n i o r s b y co n t i n u i n g t o a l l o w r e d u c e d p a r k i n g re q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e s e t y p e s o f f a c i l i t i e s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y ' s M u n i c i p a l C o d e S S F M C 2 0 . 3 3 0 . 0 0 4 r e d u c e s p a r k i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s fo r r e s i d e n t i a l c a r e f a c i l i t i e s a s p a r t o f t h e 2 0 1 0 Z o n i n g O r d i n a n c e U p d a t e . T h e re q u i r e m e n t i s : 1 s p a c e f o r e v e r y 7 r e s i d e n t s p l u s 1 s p a c e f o r e a c h l i v e - i n c a r e g i v e r . F a c i l i t i e s se r v i n g m o r e t h a n 1 5 r e s i d e n t s s h a l l a l s o p r o v i d e 1 s p a c e f o r e a c h c a r e g i v e r , em p l o y e e , a n d d o c t o r o n - s i t e a t a n y o n e t i m e . 5- 2 A - E n s u r e C o n s i s t e n c y w i t h S t a t e A c c e s s i b i l i t y La w s En c o u r a g e d e v e l o p m e n t o f r e s i d e n t i a l bo a r d a n d c a r e f a c i l i t i e s f o r s e n i o r s b y co n t i n u i n g t o a l l o w r e d u c e d p a r k i n g re q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e s e t y p e s o f f a c i l i t i e s . 20 2 3 Du r i n g t h e r e v i e w o f a l l n e w d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s a n d a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r mo d i f i c a t i o n s t o e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g s , t h e B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n s t a f f p l a n c h e c k s pr o j e c t s t o e n s u r e t h a t a l l S t a t e A c c e s s i b l y L a w s a r e m e t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h Ca l i f o r n i a B u i l d i n g C o d e S e c t i o n 1 1 3 4 B . 5- 2 B - P r o m o t e D i s a b l e d H o u s i n g R e s o u r c e s a n d Pr o g r a m s Th e C i t y s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t i t s w e b s i t e a n d ha n d o u t m a t e r i a l s r e g a r d i n g h o u s i n g re s o u r c e s , r e q u i r e m e n t s , a n d s e r v i c e s f o r th e d i s a b l e d a r e u p d a t e d r e g u l a r l y a n d ma d e a v a i l a b l e t o t h e p u b l i c . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y m a i n t a i n s o n l i n e r e s o u r c e s a n d m a t e r i a l s r e g a r d i n g h o u s i n g a n d se r v i c e s f o r t h e d i s a b l e d a n d h a s s t a f f i n t h e E c o n o m i c a n d C o m m u n i t y De v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t w h o a r e t r a i n e d t o a s s i s t w i t h h o u s i n g i s s u e s . 5- 3 A - A c c e s s i b i l i t y M o d i f i c a t i o n P r o g r a m s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t pr o g r a m s t h a t p r o v i d e m o d i f i c a t i o n s t h a t 20 2 3 Th e C i t y p r o v i d e s a n n u a l g r a n t f u n d i n g t o t h e C e n t e r o f I n d e p e n d e n t o f In d i v i d u a l w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s ( C I D ) w h o h a s a H o u s i n g A c c e s s i b l y M o d i f i c a t i o n ma k e h o u s i n g u n i t s a c c e s s i b l e t o t h e di s a b l e d . (H A M ) P r o g r a m t h a t p r o v i d e s f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o p e o p l e t h a t n e e d t o m a d e mo d i f i c a t i o n s t o t h e i r h o m e t o a l l o w f o r d i s a b l e d a c c e s s . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s re c e i v e d a c c e s s i b i l i t y m o d i f i c a t i o n s . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , t h e z o n i n g o r d i n a n c e i n c l u d e s S S F M C s e c t i o n 2 0 . 5 1 0 , W a i v e r s an d M o d i f i c a t i o n s , t h a t p r o v i d e s p r o v i s i o n s f o r r e a s o n a b l e a c c o m m o d a t i o n s t o en s u r e e q u a l a c c e s s t o h o u s i n g b y a l l o w i n g t h e C h i e f P l a n n e r a u t h o r i t y t o gr a n t r e l i e f f r o m z o n i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . 5- 4 A - R e a s o n a b l e A c c o m m o d a t i o n s Th e C i t y s h a l l c r e a t e a p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n br o c h u r e o n r e a s o n a b l e a c c o m m o d a t i o n fo r d i s a b l e d p e r s o n s a n d p r o v i d e t h a t in f o r m a t i o n o n t h e C i t y ' s w e b s i t e . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y p r o v i d e s i n f o r m a t i o n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e p r o g r a m . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , t h e z o n i n g o r d i n a n c e i n c l u d e s S S F M C s e c t i o n 2 0 . 5 1 0 , W a i v e r s an d M o d i f i c a t i o n s , t h a t p r o v i d e s p r o v i s i o n s f o r r e a s o n a b l e a c c o m m o d a t i o n s t o en s u r e e q u a l a c c e s s t o h o u s i n g b y a l l o w i n g t h e C h i e f P l a n n e r a u t h o r i t y t o gr a n t r e l i e f f r o m z o n i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . 5- 4 B - R e s o u r c e s f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a l l y d i s a b l e d Th e C i t y s h a l l s u p p o r t t h e G o l d e n G a t e Re g i o n a l C e n t e r i n i t s m i s s i o n t o s e r v e th o s e w i t h d e v e l o p m e n t a l d i s a b i l i t i e s , di s s e m i n a t e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e C e n t e r an d i t s s e r v i c e s , a n d m a k e r e f e r r a l s a s ap p r o p r i a t e . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y ' s Z o n i n g r e g u l a t i o n s p e r m i t A d u l t D a y C a r e u s e s i n m a n y a r e a s o f t h e Ci t y b y - r i g h t . T h e s e u s e s a r e t y p i c a l l y f u n d e d i n s o m e p a r t b y t h e G o l d e n G a t e Re g i o n a l C e n t e r t o s e r v e d e v e l o p m e n t a l l y d i s a b l e d i n f a n t s , c h i l d r e n , y o u t h a n d ad u l t s . 5- 5 A - S u p p o r t a v a r i e t y o f h o u s i n g u n i t d e s i g n s , in c l u d i n g l a r g e r h o u s i n g u n i t s t h a t c a n a c c o m m o d a t e la r g e f a m i l i e s Th e C i t y s h a l l s e e k t o b r o a d e n t h e di v e r s i t y o f i t s h o u s i n g s t o c k t h a t i s af f o r d a b l e t o e x t r e m e l y l o w , v e r y l o w , a n d lo w i n c o m e h o u s e h o l d s t o i n c l u d e m o r e un i t s t h a t a r e s u i t a b l e t o l a r g e f a m i l i e s . Cu r r e n t l y , m u c h o f S o u t h S a n Fr a n c i s c o ¿ s a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g c o n s i s t s of s i n g l e - r o o m o c c u p a n c y u n i t s a n d o n e - an d t w o - b e d r o o m u n i t s . T h e C i t y s h a l l wo r k w i t h h o u s i n g d e v e l o p e r s d u r i n g t h e en t i t l e m e n t pr o c e s s a n d e n c o u r a g e t h e m t o p r o v i d e a un i t m i x w i t h a t l e a s t 1 0 p e r c e n t o f u n i t s ha v i n g th r e e o r m o r e b e d r o o m s . 20 2 3 At p r e - a p p l i c a t i o n m e e t i n g s s t a f f d i s c u s s e s p r o v i d i n g a r a n g e o f h o u s i n g s i z e s wi t h d e v e l o p e r s d u r i n g t h e p l a n n i n g s t a g e s o f r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s pr i o r t o t h e s u b m i t t a l o f a f o r m a l a p p l i c a t i o n . Th e r e c e n t r e z o n i n g e f f o r t f o r t h e D o w n t o w n T r a n s i t C o r e z o n i n g d i s t r i c t in c l u d e s a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n f o r f a m i l y h o u s i n g ( 2 - 3 b e d r o o m u n i t s ) i n o r d e r t o be e l i g i b l e f o r t h e m a x i m u m d e n s i t y . N o m i n i m u m p e r c e n t a g e o f 1 0 p e r c e n t wa s i n c l u d e d , h o w e v e r . 5- 6 A - S u p p o r t C o n t i n u u m o f C a r e P l a n n i n g Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o b e a n a c t i v e pa r t i c i p a n t i n t h e C o n t i n u u m o f C a r e pl a n n i n g p r o c e s s a n d s u p p o r t i t s e f f o r t s t o ad d r e s s t h e n e e d s o f S o u t h S a n Fr a n c i s c o r e s i d e n t s i n n e e d o f e m e r g e n c y sh e l t e r o r t e m p o r a r y h o u s i n g . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o p r o v i d e r e f e r r a l s t o f a m i l i e s a n d i n d i v i d u a l s f o r s o c i a l se r v i c e s i n c l u d i n g c a s e m a n a g e m e n t a n d r e f e r r a l s f o r h o u s i n g a n d h o m e l e s s pr e v e n t i o n , a s a p p r o p r i a t e . 5- 6 B - S u p p o r t n o n - p r o f i t s t h a t o f f e r h o u s i n g s o l u t i o n s an d s e r v i c e s f o r h o m e l e s s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t n o n - pr o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t o f f e r s o l u t i o n s t o so l v i n g h o m e l e s s n e s s a n d / o r p r o v i d e ho u s i n g r e l a t e d s e r v i c e s f o r t h e h o m e l e s s or a t - r i s k h o m e l e s s . 20 2 3 Th e r e i s a C o u n t y r u n h o m e l e s s s h e l t e r l o c a t e d i n S o u t h S a n F r a n c i s c o o n No r t h A c c e s s R o a d . T h e f o r m e r R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y r e g u l a r l y p r o v i d e d fu n d i n g t o t h e C o u n t y f o r t h e o p e r a t i o n o f t h e s h e l t e r . A s p a r t o f t h e 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 2 3 Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t u p d a t e , t h e C i t y c o n d u c t e d a c a p a c i t y a n a l y s i s f o r n e w em e r g e n c y s h e l t e r c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h i n a p p r o v e d z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s . 5- 6 C - S u p p o r t O n g o i n g O p e r a t i o n o f 9 0 - B e d Em e r g e n c y S h e l t e r i n S o u t h S a n F r a n c i s c o Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t t h e op e r a t i o n o f a 9 0 - b e d y e a r r o u n d ho m e l e s s s h e l t e r w i t h i n t h e c i t y l i m i t s . 20 2 3 Fu n d i n g f o r h o m e l e s s s e r v i c e s a n d h o u s i n g w a s p r o v i d e d t o S a m a r i t a n H o u s e an d C O R A ( C o m m u n i t i e s O v e r c o m i n g R e l a t i o n s h i p A b u s e ) . 5- 6 D - S o c i a l S e r v i c e s f o r H o u s i n g a n d H o m e l e s s Pr e v e n t i o n Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e re f e r r a l s t o o r g a n i z a t i o n s h e l p i n g f a m i l i e s wi t h s o c i a l s e r v i c e s f o r h o u s i n g a n d ho m e l e s s p r e v e n t i o n . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y m a i n t a i n s o n l i n e a n d h a n d o u t r e s o u r c e s f o r r e s i d e n t s w i t h h o u s i n g ch a l l e n g e s . 5- 7 A - S u p p o r t a n d P r o m o t e H o m e S h a r i n g Th e C i t y s h a l l s u p p o r t t h e e f f o r t s a n d se r v i c e s o f t h e H I P H o m e S h a r i n g Pr o g r a m t o p r o v i d e a n a l t e r n a t i v e h o u s i n g so l u t i o n f o r e x t r e m e l y l o w a n d v e r y l o w in c o m e i n d i v i d u a l s a n d f a m i l i e s ; f e m a l e - he a d e d h o u s e h o l d s ; t h o s e a t r i s k o f ho m e l e s s n e s s ; a n d o t h e r s i n n e e d . T h e Ec o n o m i c De v e l o p m e n t a n d H o u s i n g D i v i s i o n w i l l pr o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e H I P pr o g r a m , p r o v i d e r e f e r r a l s , a n d s u p p o r t re s i d e n t s o f S o u t h S a n F r a n c i s c o w h o a r e in t e r e s t e d i n p a r t i c i p a t i n g . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y m a i n t a i n s o n l i n e a n d h a n d o u t r e s o u r c e s f o r r e s i d e n t s w i t h h o u s i n g ch a l l e n g e s . 5- 8 A - P r o v i d e r e f e r r a l s t o V e t e r a n s w h o a r e h o m e l e s s or a t r i s k o f h o m e l e s s n e s s Th e C i t y s h a l l p r o v i d e r e f e r r a l s t o Ve t e r a n s a n d t h e i r i m m e d i a t e f a m i l i e s t h a t ar e h o m e l e s s o r a t r i s k o f h o m e l e s s n e s s . Re s o u r c e s f o r r e f e r r a l s i n c l u d e t h e Ve t e r a n ¿ s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( V A ) N a t i o n a l Ca l l C e n t e r o f H o m e l e s s V e t e r a n s a t 1 - 87 7 - 4 A I D - V E T a n d t o t h e H U D - V A S H pr o g r a m t h a t i s a j o i n t e f f o r t b e t w e e n t h e De p a r t m e n t o f H o u s i n g a n d U r b a n De v e l o p m e n t a n d t h e V A S u p p o r t i v e Ho u s i n g ( H U D - V A S H ) P r o g r a m t o m o v e Ve t e r a n s a n d t h e i r f a m i l i e s o u t o f ho m e l e s s n e s s a n d i n t o p e r m a n e n t ho u s i n g t h r o u g h a v o u c h e r p r o g r a m t h a t al l o w s h o m e l e s s V e t e r a n s t o r e n t pr i v a t e l y o w n e d 20 2 3 Ma n y o f t h e s e r e s o u r c e s a r e s h a r e d w i t h a p p l i c a b l e r e s i d e n t s t h r o u g h t h e fu n d e d S a m a r i t a n H o u s e a n d C O R A s h e l t e r s y s t e m s . T h e C i t y p r o v i d e s a n an n u a l g r a n t t o a f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r u s i n g i t s H O M E A d m i n i s t r a t i v e fu n d s . Pr o j e c t S e n t i n e l , p r o v i d e s c o m p r e h e n s i v e f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e s i n c l u d i n g co m p l a i n t i n v e s t i g a t i o n , c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h a n d e d u c a t i o n t o S a n M a t e o Co u n t y r e s i d e n t s . ho u s i n g . 5- 9 A - A m e n d t h e Z o n i n g C o d e t o c o m p l y w i t h H e a l t h an d S a f e t y C o d e S e c t i o n 1 7 0 2 1 . 5 r e g a r d i n g e m p l o y e e ho u s i n g f o r s i x o r f e w e r e m p l o y e e s Th e C i t y s h a l l a m e n d i t s Z o n i n g Or d i n a n c e t o a l l o w e m p l o y e e h o u s i n g i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h H e a l t h a n d S a f e t y C o d e Se c t i o n 1 7 0 2 1 . 5 , t o p e r m i t a n d e n c o u r a g e th e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d u s e o f s u f f i c i e n t nu m b e r s a n d t y p e s o f e m p l o y e e h o u s i n g fa c i l i t i e s a s a r e c o m m e n s u r a t e w i t h l o c a l ne e d s . 20 1 6 Th i s i t e m h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d a n d t h e Z o n i n g C o d e h a s b e e n u p d a t e d t o re f l e c t t h i s p r o g r a m . 6- 1 A - S u p p o r t E q u a l H o u s i n g O p p o r t u n i t y L a w s Th e C i t y s h a l l r e q u i r e t h a t a l l r e c i p i e n t s o f lo c a l l y - a d m i n i s t e r e d h o u s i n g a s s i s t a n c e fu n d s a n d o t h e r m e a n s o f s u p p o r t f r o m th e C i t y a c k n o w l e d g e t h e i r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of f a i r h o u s i n g l a w a n d a f f i r m t h e i r co m m i t m e n t t o t h e l a w . T h e C i t y s h a l l pr o v i d e m a t e r i a l s t o h e l p w i t h t h e un d e r s t a n d i n g o f a n d c o m p l i a n c e w i t h f a i r ho u s i n g l a w . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y p r o v i d e s a n a n n u a l g r a n t t o a f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r u s i n g i t s HO M E A d m i n i s t r a t i v e f u n d s . Pr o j e c t S e n t i n e l , p r o v i d e s c o m p r e h e n s i v e f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e s i n c l u d i n g co m p l a i n t i n v e s t i g a t i o n , c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h a n d e d u c a t i o n t o S a n M a t e o Co u n t y r e s i d e n t s . 6- 1 B - R e g i o n a l C o o p e r a t i o n Th e C i t y s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e w i t h o t h e r ju r i s d i c t i o n s i n S a n M a t e o C o u n t y t o pe r i o d i c a l l y u p d a t e t h e A n a l y s i s o f Im p e d i m e n t s t o F a i r H o u s i n g i n S a n Ma t e o C o u n t y , a r e p o r t t h a t h e l p s ju r i s d i c t i o n s i d e n t i f y i m p e d i m e n t s t o f a i r ho u s i n g a n d d e v e l o p s o l u t i o n s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y i s a m e m b e r o f t h e 2 1 E l e m e n t s T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e , wh i c h i s w o r k i n g t o a d d r e s s h o u s i n g s h o r t a g e a n d d i s p l a c e m e n t c o n c e r n s . 7- 1 A - A s s i s t w i t h e n e r g y / w e a t h e r i z a t i o n a n d w a t e r co n s e r v i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s / f e a t u r e s i n e x i s t i n g r e s i d e n t i a l re h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s Th e C i t y w i l l c o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e f u n d s t o no n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t p r o v i d e en e r g y e f f i c i e n c y u p g r a d e s a n d / o r we a t h e r i z a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s f o r v e r y lo w - a n d l o w - i n c o m e h o u s e h o l d s . 20 2 3 Th r o u g h t h e C i t y ' s H o u s i n g R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o g r a m a n d C D B G s u b r e c i p i e n t gr a n t s , t h e C i t y e n c o u r a g e s w e a t h e r i z a t i o n a n d e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y u p g r a d e s . Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o p r o v i d e f u n d i n g a n d t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e t o e n e r g y ef f i c i e n c y u p g r a d e p r o g r a m s , i n c l u d i n g t h e H o m e E n e r g y R e n o v a t i o n Op p o r t u n i t y ( H E R O ) p r o g r a m . 7- 2 A - C o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n o n e n e r g y ef f i c i e n t s t a n d a r d s f o r r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s Th e C i t y s h a l l p r o m o t e t h e u s e o f p a s s i v e an d a c t i v e s o l a r s y s t e m s i n n e w a n d ex i s t i n g r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s t o e n s u r e th a t S t a t e r e s i d e n t i a l e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n bu i l d i n g s t a n d a r d s a r e m e t . T h e C i t y ' s Cl i m a t e A c t i o n P l a n ( C A P ) , a d o p t e d i n Fe b r u a r y 2 0 1 4 , a l s o i n c l u d e s m e a s u r e s t o pr o m o t e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , w h i c h a r e ac t i v e l y i m p l e m e n t e d . 20 2 3 Bu i l d i n g D i v i s i o n s t a f f i m p l e m e n t s a n d e n f o r c e s t h e C a l i f o r n i a G r e e n B u i l d i n g Co d e f o r a l l n e w r e s i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l p r o j e c t s . D u r i n g r e s i d e n t i a l re h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s , l i k e R e b u i l d i n g T o g e t h e r , r e p l a c e m e n t o f ap p l i a n c e s / u t i l i t i e s i n c l u d e s e n e r g y a n d w a t e r c o n s e r v i n g m o d e l s . Th e C i t y p r o m o t e s t h e u s e o f s o l a r p a n e l s w i t h r e d u c e d p e r m i t t i n g f e e s a n d st r e a m l i n e d r e v i e w a n d i n s p e c t i o n s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l a d o p t e d a Cl i m a t e A c t i o n P l a n ( C A P ) i n F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 4 , t h a t s e t s f o r t h r e d u c t i o n me a s u r e s t h a t a p p l y t o r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t . M e a s u r e 3 - 5 i n t h e C A P pr o m o t e s e n e r g y i n f o r m a t i o n a n d s h a r i n g , a n d e d u c a t i n g t h e c o m m u n i t y a b o u t en e r g y - e f f i c i e n c y b e h a v i o r s a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n . 7- 3 A - T i t l e 2 4 Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o e n f o r c e S t a t e re q u i r e m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g T i t l e 2 4 re q u i r e m e n t s , f o r e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n i n re s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t a n d e n c o u r a g e re s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p e r s t o c o n s i d e r em p l o y i n g a d d i t i o n a l e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n me a s u r e s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : 1. S t r e e t a n d d r i v e w a y d e s i g n 2. L o t p a t t e r n a n d c o n f i g u r a t i o n 3. S i t i n g o f b u i l d i n g s 4. L a n d s c a p i n g 5. S o l a r a c c e s s 20 2 3 Th e C A P i n c l u d e s m e a s u r e s t h a t e n c o u r a g e t h e i n t e g r a t i o n o f h i g h e r - d e n s i t y de v e l o p m e n t a n d m i x e d - u s e d e v e l o p m e n t n e a r t r a n s i t f a c i l i t i e s a n d c o m m u n i t y fa c u l t i e s , a n d t o r e d u c e t h e d e p e n d e n c e o n a u t o s t h r o u g h s m a r t p a r k i n g pr a c t i c e s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o i m p l e m e n t T i t l e 2 4 r e q u i r e m e n t s th r o u g h t h e B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n . 7- 3 B - P r o m o t e G r e e n B u i l d i n g F e a t u r e s Th e C i t y w i l l u t i l i z e t h e f o l l o w i n g t o o l s t o pr o m o t e g r e e n b u i l d i n g a n d e n e r g y co n s e r v i n g f e a t u r e s i n n e w a n d e x i s t i n g re s i d e n t i a l c o n s t r u c t i o n . In 2 0 0 9 , t h e C i t y c o m p l e t e d t h e G r e e n X - Ra y H o u s e , t r a n s f o r m i n g a n e x i s t i n g si n g l e - f a m i l y h o m e i n t o a n e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t mo d e l h o m e . T h e C i t y w i l l u s e t h e Gr e e n X - R a y H o u s e a s a p u b l i c o u t r e a c h to o l t o d i s s e m i n a t e i n f o r m a t i o n re g a r d i n g e n e r g y - s a v i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s , of f e r i n g r e g u l a r t o u r s t o h o m e o w n e r s a n d ho m e b u i l d e r s a s w e l l a s f o r p r o m o t i o n a l ev e n t s . T h i s h o m e f e a t u r e s a n a r r a y o f pr o d u c t s i n c l u d i n g s o l a r p a n e l s , r a d i a n t fl o o r h e a t i n g a n d r e c y c l e d g l a s s t i l e s . St a f f h a s a d o p t e d t h e a G r e e n B u i l d i n g Or d i n a n c e ( 2 0 1 4 ) . 20 2 3 Bu i l d i n g D i v i s i o n s t a f f i m p l e m e n t s a n d e n f o r c e s t h e C a l i f o r n i a G r e e n B u i l d i n g Co d e f o r a l l n e w r e s i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l p r o j e c t s . D u r i n g r e s i d e n t i a l re h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s , l i k e R e b u i l d i n g T o g e t h e r , r e p l a c e m e n t o f ap p l i a n c e s / u t i l i t i e s i n c l u d e s e n e r g y a n d w a t e r c o n s e r v i n g m o d e l s . Th e G r e e n X - R a y h o u s e i s n o l o n g e r i n o p e r a t i o n . 6- 2 A - L e g a l C o u n s e l a n d A d v o c a c y A s s i s t a n c e Th e C i t y s h a l l s u p p o r t n o n p r o f i t s p r o v i d i n g le g a l c o u n s e l i n g a n d a d v o c a c y a s s i s t a n c e co n c e r n i n g f a i r h o u s i n g l a w s , r i g h t s , a n d re m e d i e s t o t h o s e w h o b e l i e v e t h e y h a v e be e n d i s c r i m i n a t e d a g a i n s t . P e r s o n s re q u e s t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n o r a s s i s t a n c e re l a t e d t o h o u s i n g d i s c r i m i n a t i o n a r e re f e r r e d t o o n e o r m o r e f a i r h o u s i n g 20 2 3 Th e C i t y p r o v i d e s a n a n n u a l g r a n t t o a f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r u s i n g i t s HO M E A d m i n i s t r a t i v e f u n d s . Pr o j e c t S e n t i n e l , p r o v i d e s c o m p r e h e n s i v e f a i r h o u s i n g s e r v i c e s i n c l u d i n g co m p l a i n t i n v e s t i g a t i o n , c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h a n d e d u c a t i o n t o S a n M a t e o Co u n t y r e s i d e n t s . gr o u p s f o r l e g a l s e r v i c e s . C o n s i s t e n t w i t h ex i s t i n g p r a c t i c e , b r o c h u r e s p r o v i d i n g in f o r m a t i o n o n f a i r h o u s i n g a n d t e n a n t s ' ri g h t s a r e a v a i l a b l e a t C i t y H a l l , p u b l i c li b r a r i e s a n d o n t h e C i t y ' s w e b s i t e . T h e br o c h u r e s a r e a l s o a v a i l a b l e a t n o n p r o f i t or g a n i z a t i o n s s e r v i n g l o w - i n c o m e re s i d e n t s . T h e b r o c h u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e i n En g l i s h a n d S p a n i s h . A s f u n d i n g a l l o w s , th e C i t y s h a l l p r o v i d e f u n d i n g a s s i s t a n c e to o r g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t p r o v i d e f a i r h o u s i n g , te n a n t / l a n d l o r d , a n d h a b i t a b i l i t y co u n s e l i n g a n d o t h e r g e n e r a l h o u s i n g as s i s t a n c e . 1- 4 A - S i t e A c q u i s i t i o n Th e C i t y s h a l l w o r k w i t h f o r - p r o f i t a n d no n p r o f i t h o u s i n g d e v e l o p e r s t o a c q u i r e si t e s t h a t a r e e i t h e r v a c a n t o r d e v e l o p e d wi t h u n d e r u t i l i z e d , b l i g h t e d , a n d / o r no n c o n f o r m i n g u s e s f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g . A s n e e d e d , t h e C i t y wi l l m e e t w i t h d e v e l o p e r s t o d i s c u s s a n d id e n t i f y d e v e l o p m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s a n d po t e n t i a l f u n d i n g s o u r c e s . 20 2 3 Wi t h a d o p t i o n o f t h e S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y ' s L o n g R a n g e P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t Pl a n b y t h e S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f F i n a n c e i n l a t e 2 0 1 5 , t h e C i t y i s p o s i t i o n e d t o he l p c o o r d i n a t e t h e d i s p o s i t i o n o f u n d e r u t i l i z e d p r o p e r t i e s f o r d e v e l o p m e n t . To d a t e , C i t y s t a f f h a s m e t w i t h s e v e r a l d e v e l o p m e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s a n d ma d e s i x ( 6 ) p r o p e r t i e s i n t h e D o w n t o w n a r e a a v a i l a b l e t h r o u g h a R e q u e s t f o r Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s . O n e ( 1 ) s i t e i s u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h 1 0 0 % a f f o r d a b l e s e n i o r ho u s i n g u n i t s . T w o ( 2 ) s i t e s w i l l b e d e v e l o p e d w i t h r e n t a l h o u s i n g a n d 2 0 % af f o r d a b l e u n i t s d u e t o t h e i n c l u s i o n o f C i t y f u n d i n g . O n e ( 1 ) s i t e i s e n t i t l e d f o r de v e l o p m e n t o f f o r - s a l e h i g h d e n s i t y h o u s i n g w i t h 2 0 % i n c l u s i o n a r y h o u s i n g re q u i r e d . 1- 4 B - S u p p o r t a n d P u r s u e F u n d i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s f o r Af f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g Co n s i s t e n t w i t h e x i s t i n g p r a c t i c e , t h e C i t y sh a l l c o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t f u n d i n g ap p l i c a t i o n s f o r f e d e r a l a n d s t a t e f u n d s t o pr o m o t e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a f f o r d a b l e ho u s i n g . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y h a s a p p l i e d e a c h y e a r f o r s t a t e f u n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e C a p & T r a d e gr a n t p r o g r a m s f o r m o n i e s t o c o n s t r u c t c o m p l e t e s t r e e t s i n s u p p o r t o f p e n d i n g af f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n . To d a t e , n o g r a n t m o n i e s h a v e b e e n a w a r d e d t o t h e C i t y . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , a 1 0 0 % a f f o r d a b l e r e n t a l p r o j e c t f o r v e r y - l o w i n c o m e s e n i o r s h a s be e n i s s u e d c o n s t r u c t i o n p e r m i t s i n 2 0 1 7 . T h i s p r o j e c t s u c c e s s f u l l y r e c e i v e d af f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g f i n a n c i n g w i t h t h e C i t y ' s s u p p o r t o f t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n . 1- 4 C - C o n s i d e r W a i v e r s o r D e f e r r a l s o f P l a n n i n g , Bu i l d i n g a n d I m p a c t F e e s f o r A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g De v e l o p m e n t Co n s i s t e n t w i t h S S F M C s e c t i o n 20 . 3 1 0 . 0 0 4 , t h e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o co n s i d e r t h e w a i v e r o f a p p l i c a t i o n a n d de v e l o p m e n t f e e s f o r a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g de v e l o p m e n t i n o r d e r t o s u p p o r t t h e fi n a n c i a l v i a b i l i t y o f a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g de v e l o p m e n t . W a i v e r o f s u c h f e e s w i l l b e on a c a s e - b y - c a s e b a s i s a t t h e C i t y Co u n c i l ¿ s d i s c r e t i o n a n d w i l l b a l a n c e t h e 20 2 3 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o c o n s i d e r p e r m i t t i n g o r i m p a c t f e e w a i v e r s f o r a n af f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g p r o j e c t r e q u i r i n g f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e . go a l o f a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g p r o d u c t i o n w i t h th e n e e d t o c o l l e c t f e e r e v e n u e s t o su p p o r t o t h e r C i t y g o a l s . 1- 4 D - R e v i e w N e w D e v e l o p m e n t R e q u i r e m e n t s f o r Co n d o m i n i u m s , S S F M C 1 9 . 3 6 Th e C i t y s h a l l r e v i e w S S F M C 1 9 . 3 6 , wh i c h r e q u i r e s a m i n i m u m o f 5 u n i t s i n or d e r t o c o n s t r u c t n e w c o n d o m i n i u m s , t o lo o k a t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f r e d u c i n g u n i t re q u i r e m e n t s 20 2 3 Ci t y s t a f f h a s n o t y e t c o n s i d e r e d t h i s i t e m . 1- 1 A - V a c a n t a n d U n d e r u t i l i z e d L a n d I n v e n t o r y Th e C i t y s h a l l p e r i o d i c a l l y u p d a t e i t s in v e n t o r y o f v a c a n t a n d u n d e r u t i l i z e d pa r c e l s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h i s H o u s i n g E l e m e n t . Th e C i t y s h a l l a l s o c o n d u c t a p e r i o d i c re v i e w o f t h e c o m p o s i t i o n o f t h e h o u s i n g st o c k , t h e t y p e s o f d w e l l i n g u n i t s u n d e r co n s t r u c t i o n o r e x p e c t e d t o b e co n s t r u c t e d d u r i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g y e a r , a n d th e a n t i c i p a t e d m i x , b a s e d o n de v e l o p m e n t p r o p o s a l s a p p r o v e d o r un d e r r e v i e w b y t h e C i t y , o f t h e h o u s i n g t o be d e v e l o p e d d u r i n g t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e pe r i o d c o v e r e d b y t h e H o u s i n g E l e m e n t . Th i s a n a l y s i s w i l l b e c o m p a r e d t o t h e Ci t y ' s r e m a i n i n g 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 2 2 R e g i o n a l Ho u s i n g N e e d s A l l o c a t i o n ( R H N A ) t o de t e r m i n e i f a n y c h a n g e s i n l a n d u s e po l i c y a r e w a r r a n t e d . An n u a l Th e C i t y a d o p t e d t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n ( D S A S P ) i n Fe b r u a r y , 2 0 1 5 a n d t h e D S A S P i m p l e m e n t s n e w z o n i n g r e g u l a t i o n s t h a t in c r e a s e h e i g h t a n d d e n s i t y t o p e r m i t t h e C i t y t o c o n s t r u c t a p p r o p r i a t e u n i t s t o me e t t h e A B A G R e g i o n a l H o u s i n g N e e d s A l l o c a t i o n ( R H N A ) f o r 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 2 2 . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , t h e C i t y r e v i s e d a n d u p d a t e d t h e E l C a m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t Av e n u e A r e a P l a n t o r e f l e c t a n e w C o m m u n i t y C i v i c C a m p u s p r o j e c t . T h i s pr o j e c t r e q u i r e d t h e C i t y t o u p d a t e t h e l i s t o f h o u s i n g o p p o r t u n i t y s i t e s i n t h e Ad o p t e d H o u s i n g E l e m e n t . T h i s r e v i s i o n h a s b e e n s u b m i t t e d f o r r e v i e w a n d ap p r o v a l b y t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f H o u s i n g a n d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t . 1- 2 A I n c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g O r d i n a n c e Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o i m p l e m e n t t h e In c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g O r d i n a n c e , i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h S t a t e l a w , r e q u i r i n g n e w fo r s a l e r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t o v e r f o u r un i t s t o p r o v i d e a m i n i m u m o f t w e n t y ( 2 0 ) pe r c e n t l o w - a n d m o d e r a t e - i n c o m e ho u s i n g . 20 2 3 Th e I n c l u s i o n a r y H o u s i n g O r d i n a n c e r e g u l a t i o n s ( S S F M C C h a p t e r 2 0 . 3 8 0 ) a r e an d c o n t i n u e t o b e , i m p l e m e n t e d b y t h e C i t y i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h S t a t e l a w . Th e C i t y C o u n c i l i s c u r r e n t l y s t u d y i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o u p d a t e t h e I n c l u s i o n a r y Ho u s i n g O r d i n a n c e t o r e f l e c t t h e a d o p t e d A B 1 5 0 5 a b i l i t y t o r e q u i r e in c l u s i o n a r y h o u s i n g i n r e n t a l h o u s i n g p r o j e c t s . 1- 3 A - I n v e s t i g a t e C o m m e r c i a l a n d H o u s i n g L i n k a g e Fe e Th r o u g h p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e 2 1 E l e m e n t s gr o u p , t h e C i t y w i l l i n v e s t i g a t e t h e fe a s i b i l i t y o f co m m e r c i a l a n d h o u s i n g l i n k a g e f e e s t o su p p o r t a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g . 20 1 5 Th e 2 1 E l e m e n t s N e x u s S t u d y h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d a n d t h e C i t y w a s di s t r i b u t e d t h e d r a f t c o m m e r c i a l a n d r e s i d e n t i a l f e e r e p o r t s . C i t y S t a f f i s st u d y i n g t h e c o m m e r c i a l f e e r e p o r t , u p d a t i n g i t w i t h c u r r e n t d a t a , a n d p r e p a r i n g to p r e s e n t t h e r e p o r t t o t h e C i t y C o u n c i l f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d f e e d b a c k . 1- 5 A - I n c r e a s e d R e s i d e n t i a l D e n s i t i e s i n t h e D o w n t o w n Ar e a Th r o u g h i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e D o w n t o w n St a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n , s u p p o r t 20 2 3 Ad o p t i o n o f t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n h a s a c c o m p l i s h e d t h i s pr o g r a m . E x p a n d e d i n c r e a s e s i n d e n s i t i e s w i t h i n t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a in c r e a s e d r e s i d e n t i a l d e n s i t i e s a n d mo d i f i e d d e v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d s f o r pa r c e l s i n t h e d o w n t o w n a r e a t o r e a l i z e th e o b j e c t i v e s o f t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n Ar e a S p e c i f i c P l a n a n d G e n e r a l P l a n po l i c i e s . Sp e c i f i c P l a n , o r w i t h i n s u r r o u n d i n g r e s i d e n t i a l z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s n e a r t h e Do w n t o w n h a s a l s o b e e n a n a l y z e d . O n 2 / 2 8 / 1 8 , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l w i l l c o n s i d e r a p o s i t i v e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n b y t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n t o i n c r e a s e t h e ma x i m u m d e n s i t y f o r t h e D o w n t o w n T r a n s i t C o r e z o n i n g d i s t r i c t , w h i c h i s lo c a t e d w i t h i n t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n . 1- 5 B - S u p p o r t G r a n d B o u l e v a r d I n i t i a t i v e P o l i c i e s Co n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t t h e g u i d i n g p r i n c i p l e s of t h e G r a n d B o u l e v a r d I n i t i a t i v e , w h i c h en c o u r a g e s t h e p r o v i s i o n o f m e d i u m - a n d hi g h - d e n s i t y h o u s i n g a l o n g E l C a m i n o Re a l i n P e n i n s u l a c o m m u n i t i e s , i n o r d e r to c r e a t e a n e n v i r o n m e n t t h a t i s su p p o r t i v e o f t r a n s i t , w a l k a b l e , a n d m i x e d - us e . T h e C i t y s h a l l r e f e r e n c e t h i s p o l i c y di r e c t i o n w h e n c o n s i d e r i n g f u t u r e l a n d us e a n d z o n i n g c h a n g e s a l o n g E l C a m i n o Re a l , a n d a s s e s s t h e o p p o r t u n i t y f o r ho u s i n g d e v e l o p m e n t a l o n g t h i s k e y co r r i d o r a s d e v e l o p m e n t p r o p o s a l s a r i s e . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o s u p p o r t t h e G r a n d B o u l e v a r d I n i t i a t i v e , i n i t s t w e l f t h y e a r , by p r o v i d i n g s e n i o r l e v e l p l a n n i n g s t a f f a t a l l m e e t i n g s . T h e a d o p t e d E l Ca m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t A r e a P l a n , a s w e l l a s t h e z o n i n g u p d a t e a d o p t e d i n 20 1 0 , i m p l e m e n t t h e g u i d i n g p r i n c i p l e s o f t h e G r a n d B o u l e v a r d I n i t i a t i v e . Th e C i t y i s c u r r e n t l y m a s t e r p l a n n i n g a n e w c o m m u n i t y c i v i c c e n t e r w i t h i n t h e El C a m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t A r e a P l a n t h a t w i l l f o s t e r n e w p r i v a t e h o u s i n g de v e l o p m e n t i n t h e s u r r o u n d i n g p l a n a r e a . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e C i t y ' s E c o n o m i c an d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t i s c o m p l e t i n g a n R F P f o r h o u s i n g de v e l o p m e n t o n C i t y - c o n t r o l l e d p a r c e l s w i t h i n t h e E l C a m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t Ar e a P l a n . T h e f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t w i l l c o n f o r m t o t h e G r a n d B o u l e v a r d In i t i a t i v e p o l i c i e s . 1- 6 A - C o n t i n u e t o s u p p o r t t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f se c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g u n i t s a n d e d u c a t e t h e c o m m u n i t y ab o u t t h i s p r o g r a m Ac t i v e l y p r o m o t e c o m m u n i t y e d u c a t i o n o n se c o n d u n i t s , a s p e r m i t t e d i n S S F M C 20 . 3 5 0 . 0 3 5 , b y p o s t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n re g a r d i n g s e c o n d u n i t s o n t h e C i t y we b s i t e a n d p r o v i d i n g b r o c h u r e s a t t h e pu b l i c c o u n t e r i n t h e C e n t r a l i z e d P e r m i t Ce n t e r . 20 2 3 Br o c h u r e s a r e p r o v i d e d a t t h e P e r m i t C e n t e r C o u n t e r ; i n a d d i t i o n s t a f f e x p l o r e s se c o n d u n i t o p t i o n s d u r i n g c o u n t e r d i s c u s s i o n s a n d d u r i n g b u i l d i n g p e r m i t p l a n ch e c k s . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , c h a n g e s a t t h e S t a t e l e v e l t o e n c o u r a g e t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f s e c o n d un i t s l e d t h e C i t y t o m o d i f y t h e c u r r e n t z o n i n g r e g u l a t i o n s t o b e m o r e pe r m i s s i v e . R e d u c e d o r n o p a r k i n g , r e d u c e d s e t b a c k s , l a r g e r s e c o n d u n i t s , an d u n i t s w i t h m u l t i p l e b e d r o o m s a r e n o w p e r m i t t e d w i t h a p p r o v a l o f a B u i l d i n g Di v i s i o n p e r m i t o n l y . 1- 7 A - C o n t i n u e t o i d e n t i f y o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r r e s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t t h r o u g h i n f i l l a n d r e d e v e l o p m e n t o f un d e r u t i l i z e d s i t e s Th r o u g h c o m p l e t i o n a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n of t h e D o w n t o w n S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n a n d on g o i n g i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e E l C a m i n o Re a l / C h e s t n u t A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n , t h e BA R T T r a n s i t V i l l a g e P l a n , t h e E l C a m i n o Re a l M i x e d U s e Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t s t h e C i t y wi l l m a i n t a i n a n i n v e n t o r y o f r e s i d e n t i a l de v e l o p m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s o n i n f i l l a n d un d e r u t i l i z e d s i t e s w i t h p r o p e r z o n i n g t o su p p o r t b o t h a f f o r d a b l e a n d m a r k e t r a t e ho u s i n g d e v e l o p m e n t . 20 2 3 Th e D e p a r t m e n t o f E c o n o m i c a n d C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t - E c o n o m i c De v e l o p m e n t a n d H o u s i n g D i v i s i o n m a i n t a i n s a l i s t o f p o t e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t si t e s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e D i v i s i o n i s c u r r e n t l y c o n d u c t i n g a R e q u e s t f o r Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s f o r s e v e r a l u n d e r u t i l i z e d s i t e s w i t h i n t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a Sp e c i f i c P l a n a n d E l C a m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t A v e n u e A r e a P l a n f o r p o t e n t i a l ho u s i n g r e d e v e l o p m e n t . 1- 7 B - E v a l u a t e D o w n t o w n r e s i d e n t i a l l o t s t a n d a r d s Ev a l u a t e t h e f e a s i b i l i t y o f r e d u c e d l o t de v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d s f o r D o w n t o w n 20 2 3 Fu n d i n g r e q u e s t s h a v e b e e n m a d e b y t h e E C D D e p a r t m e n t t o h i r e a co n s u l t a n t a n d p u r s u e t h i s i n 2 0 1 8 . re s i d e n t i a l z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s t o e n c o u r a g e th e d e v e l o p m e n t o f n e w h o u s i n g a n d ow n e r s h i p o p p o r t u n i t i e s . 2- 1 A - E x p e d i t e P e r m i t R e v i e w To s u p p o r t a f f o r d a b l e a n d m a r k e t r a t e ho u s i n g co n s t r u c t i o n , t h e C i t y s h a l l w o r k w i t h pr o p e r t y o w n e r s , p r o j e c t s p o n s o r s , a n d de v e l o p e r s t o e x p e d i t e t h e p e r m i t r e v i e w pr o c e s s ; p r o m o t e h o u s i n g d e s i g n a n d pr o j e c t s t h a t m e e t t h e g o a l s , o b j e c t i v e s an d p o l i c i e s o f t h i s H o u s i n g E l e m e n t ; pr o v i d e t i m e l y a s s i s t a n c e a n d a d v i c e o n pe r m i t s , f e e s , e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e v i e w re q u i r e m e n t s , a n d a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g ag r e e m e n t s t o a v o i d c o s t l y d e l a y s i n pr o j e c t a p p r o v a l ; a n d i n t e r f a c e w i t h co m m u n i t y g r o u p s a n d l o c a l r e s i d e n t s t o en s u r e p u b l i c s u p p o r t o f m a j o r n e w ho u s i n g d e v e l o p m e n t s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o p r o v i d e p r o m p t c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e , a n d u s e p r o j e c t pl a n n e r l i a i s o n s f o r l a r g e d e v e l o p m e n t s , t o f a c i l i t a t e e x p e d i t e d e n t i t l e m e n t re v i e w a n d p r o c e s s i n g . T h e y e a r 2 0 1 7 w a s p a r t i c u l a r l y s u c c e s s f u l f o r s t a f f - se v e r a l n e w l a r g e - s c a l e h o u s i n g d e v e l o p m e n t s w e r e a p p r o v e d u n d e r t i m e se n s i t i v e c o n d i t i o n s . Th e O n e S t o p P e r m i t c e n t e r p r o v i d e s a c c e s s i b l e s e r v i c e s b y P l a n n i n g , Bu i l d i n g a n d P u b l i c W o r k s i n o n e b u i l d i n g . T h e O n e S t o p P e r m i t C e n t e r h o u r s ar e f r o m 7 a m - 5 p m . P e r m i t p r o c e s s i n g i s e f f i c i e n t a n d t i m e l y , w i t h a c c e s s i b l e st a f f . T h e C i t y ' s P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n m e e t s t w i c e a m o n t h a n d t h e D e s i g n Re v i e w B o a r d m e e t s o n c e a m o n t h t o e n s u r e t h e t i m e l y p r o c e s s i n g o f ap p l i c a t i o n s . 2- 2 A - E n s u r e c o o r d i n a t i o n a m o n g d e p a r t m e n t s Ea r l y i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n pr o c e s s , t h e P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n s h a l l w o r k wi t h t h e a p p l i c a n t a n d c o n s u l t w i t h o t h e r de p a r t m e n t s a n d d i v i s i o n s t o e n s u r e t h a t ne c e s s a r y i n f r a s t r u c t u r e i s p l a n n e d o r i s in p l a c e t o s u p p o r t t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t . 20 2 3 Th e C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t r e l i e s o n a T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y Gr o u p a n d p r e - s u b m i t t a l m e e t i n g s w i t h p o t e n t i a l a p p l i c a n t s t o e n s u r e a s m o o t h ap p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s . R e p r e s e n t a t i v e s f r o m P u b l i c W o r k s , F i r e S a f e t y , P o l i c e , Wa t e r Q u a l i t y a n d B u i l d i n g e n s u r e t h a t a d e q u a t e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e i s p l a n n e d o r av a i l a b l e t o s u p p o r t t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t . A d d i t i o n a l l y , a p p l i c a n t s o f l a r g e de v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s a r e i n v i t e d t o a t t e n d t h e T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y G r o u p me e t i n g s t o p r e s e n t t h e i r p r e - d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s a n d d i s c u s s a n y q u e s t i o n s or c o n c e r n s w i t h C i t y s t a f f . 2- 3 A - S u p p o r t r e g i o n a l f u n d i n g p r o g r a m s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o p a r t i c i p a t e w i t h ot h e r g o v e r n m e n t a g e n c i e s t o s u p p o r t re g i o n a l f u n d i n g p r o g r a m s , s u c h a s pa r t i c i p a t i n g w i t h S a n M a t e o C o u n t y i n i t s Ho u s i n g R e v e n u e B o n d a n d M o r t g a g e Cr e d i t C e r t i f i c a t e p r o g r a m s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e 2 1 E l e m e n t s T A C m e e t i n g s . T h e C i t y al s o c o l l a b o r a t e s w i t h H E A R T ( H o u s i n g E n d o w m e n t a n d R e g i o n a l T r u s t ) o f Sa n M a t e o C o u n t y a s w e l l a s t h e H o u s i n g L e a d e r s h i p C o u n c i l o f S a n M a t e o Co u n t y . T h e H o u s i n g R e h a b B o n d a n d M o r t g a g e C r e d i t C e r t i f i c a t e P r o g r a m s we r e n o t u t i l i z e d f o r a n y C i t y f i n a n c e d c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t s i n 2 0 1 7 . 2- 4 A - C o n t i n u e t o i m p l e m e n t a d o p t e d d e s i g n gu i d e l i n e s Im p l e m e n t a t i o n o f d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s ap p l i e s t o r e h a b i l i t a t i o n a n d r e n o v a t i o n o f ex i s t i n g s t r u c t u r e s a s w e l l a s t o n e w co n s t r u c t i o n . 20 2 3 Th e R e s i d e n t i a l D e s i g n G u i d e w a s a d o p t e d b y t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n b y Re s o l u t i o n N o . 2 4 7 1 . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e a d o p t e d E l C a m i n o R e a l / C h e s t n u t Av e n u e P l a n a n d D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n A r e a S p e c i f i c P l a n i n c l u d e s D e s i g n St a n d a r d s a n d G u i d e l i n e s . A l l n e w p r o j e c t s a r e e v a l u a t e d f o r c o n s i s t e n c y w i t h ap p l i c a b l e d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s . Ci t y s t a f f w i l l r e q u e s t f u n d i n g i n 2 0 1 8 t o u p d a t e t h e R e s i d e n t i a l D e s i g n G u i d e an d h i r e a c o n s u l t a n t f o r u p d a t e a s s i s t a n c e . 2- 5 A - D i s s e m i n a t e I n f o r m a t i o n o n A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g Pr o g r a m s To w i d e n t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f i n f o r m a t i o n t o in t e r e s t e d r e s i d e n t s , t h e C i t y w i l l c o n t i n u e to u p d a t e i t s w e b s i t e a n d o t h e r pr o m o t i o n a l / i n f o r m a t i o n a l m a t e r i a l s t o in c l u d e i n f o r m a t i o n o n a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g , ho u s i n g p r o g r a m s , a n d i n c l u s i o n a r y u n i t s . 20 2 3 Th e H o u s i n g D i v i s i o n m a i n t a i n s o n l i n e r e s o u r c e s f o r g e n e r a l a f f o r d a b l e ho u s i n g p r o g r a m s a n d f o r s p e c i f i c i n c l u s i o n a r y u n i t s r e l a t e d t o n e w de v e l o p m e n t . 3- 1 A - M i n o r H o m e R e p a i r Th e C i t y w i l l p r o v i d e f u n d s t o n o n - p r o f i t or g a n i z a t i o n s p r o v i d i n g f r e e m i n o r h o m e re p a i r s t o a s s i s t e x t r e m e l y l o w - t o l o w - in c o m e h o m e o w n e r s t o b r i n g h o u s e s i n t o a g o o d s t a t e o f r e p a i r a n d m a i n t a i n t h e m as v i a b l e u n i t s in t h e l o c a l h o u s i n g s t o c k . 20 2 3 Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m s C e n t e r f o r I n d e p e n d e n c e o f I n d i v i d u a l s w i t h Di s a b i l i t i e s ( C I D ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t C I D H o u s i n g Ac c e s s i b i l i t y M o d i f i c a t i o n ( H A M ) P r o g r a m w h i c h p r o v i d e s a c c e s s i b i l i t y mo d i f i c a t i o n s . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s r e c e i v e d a c c e s s i b i l i t y m o d i f i c a t i o n s . Re b u i l d i n g T o g e t h e r P e n i n s u l a ( R T P ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t tw o R T P p r o g r a m s , N a t i o n a l R e b u i l d i n g D a y a n d S a f e a t H o m e . N i n e t e e n ( 1 9 ) ho u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . El C o n c i l i o : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t E l C o n c i l i o ' s P e n i n s u l a Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . 3- 1 B - F u n d i n g P r i o r i t i z a t i o n Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o g i v e h o u s i n g re h a b i l i t a t i o n e f f o r t s h i g h p r i o r i t y i n t h e us e o f C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t B l o c k Gr a n t ( C D B G ) f u n d s . F u n d s s h a l l b e ta r g e t e d t o w a r d s o l d e r h o u s i n g s t o c k a n d to f a m i l i e s e a r n i n g l e s s t h a n 8 0 p e r c e n t o f AM I . 20 2 3 Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m s C e n t e r f o r I n d e p e n d e n c e o f I n d i v i d u a l s w i t h Di s a b i l i t i e s ( C I D ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t C I D H o u s i n g Ac c e s s i b i l i t y M o d i f i c a t i o n ( H A M ) P r o g r a m w h i c h p r o v i d e s a c c e s s i b i l i t y mo d i f i c a t i o n s . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s r e c e i v e d a c c e s s i b i l i t y m o d i f i c a t i o n s . Re b u i l d i n g T o g e t h e r P e n i n s u l a ( R T P ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t tw o R T P p r o g r a m s , N a t i o n a l R e b u i l d i n g D a y a n d S a f e a t H o m e . N i n e t e e n ( 1 9 ) ho u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . El C o n c i l i o : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t E l C o n c i l i o ' s P e n i n s u l a Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . 3- 1 C - L o w I n t e r e s t L o a n s f o r H o u s i n g R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Th e C i t y s h a l l p r o v i d e l o w - i n t e r e s t l o a n s fo r r e h a b i l i t a t i o n o f s i n g l e - f a m i l y a n d mu l t i - f a m i l y h o u s i n g b y s u p p o r t i n g t h e Ci t y ' s H o u s i n g R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o g r a m wi t h c o n t i n u e d C D B G f u n d i n g . 20 2 3 Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m s C e n t e r f o r I n d e p e n d e n c e o f I n d i v i d u a l s w i t h Di s a b i l i t i e s ( C I D ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t C I D H o u s i n g Ac c e s s i b i l i t y M o d i f i c a t i o n ( H A M ) P r o g r a m w h i c h p r o v i d e s a c c e s s i b i l i t y mo d i f i c a t i o n s . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s r e c e i v e d a c c e s s i b i l i t y m o d i f i c a t i o n s . Re b u i l d i n g T o g e t h e r P e n i n s u l a ( R T P ) : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t tw o R T P p r o g r a m s , N a t i o n a l R e b u i l d i n g D a y a n d S a f e a t H o m e . N i n e t e e n ( 1 9 ) ho u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . El C o n c i l i o : T h e C i t y u s e d C D B G f u n d s t o s u p p o r t E l C o n c i l i o ' s P e n i n s u l a Mi n o r H o m e R e p a i r P r o g r a m . S i x ( 6 ) h o u s e h o l d s w e r e s u p p o r t e d . 3- 1 D - F i n a n c i a l A s s i s t a n c e f o r S R O s Th e C i t y s h a l l p r o v i d e f i n a n c i a l 20 2 3 Th e C i t y d i d n o t p r o v i d e a n y f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o S i n g l e R o o m O c c u p a n c i e s as s i s t a n c e , w h e n f e a s i b l e , f o r p h y s i c a l im p r o v e m e n t s t o e x i s t i n g b o a r d i n g r o o m s an d S i n g l e R o o m O c c u p a n c i e s i n t h e Do w n t o w n a r e a . in t h e D o w n t o w n a r e a i n 2 0 1 7 . 3- 2 A - E n f o r c e H o u s i n g , B u i l d i n g a n d S a f e t y C o d e s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o a g g r e s s i v e l y en f o r c e u n i f o r m h o u s i n g , b u i l d i n g , a n d sa f e t y c o d e s a s w e l l a s e l i m i n a t e in c o m p a t i b l e u s e s o r b l i g h t i n g i n f l u e n c e s fr o m r e s i d e n t i a l n e i g h b o r h o o d s t h r o u g h ta r g e t e d c o d e e n f o r c e m e n t a n d o t h e r av a i l a b l e r e g u l a t o r y m e a s u r e s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y o p e r a t e s a C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t D i v i s i o n t h r o u g h t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . Fo r 2 0 1 7 t h e r e w e r e u p t o 5 e n f o r c e m e n t o f f i c e r s o n s t a f f t h a t e n f o r c e h o u s i n g , bu i l d i n g a n d s a f e t y c o d e s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n s t a f f e n f o r c e s t h e s e co d e s w h e n t h e y a r e o u t o n i n s p e c t i o n s . I n c o m p a t i b l e u s e s a r e a d d r e s s e d i n zo n i n g c o d e s e c t i o n 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 3- 3 A - C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m f o r O l d e r Ne i g h b o r h o o d s Th e C i t y s h a l l m a i n t a i n i t s c a p i t a l im p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m t o u p g r a d e in f r a s t r u c t u r e i n o l d e r n e i g h b o r h o o d s s u c h as V i l l a g e W a y , W i l l o w G a r d e n s , T o w n o f Ba d e n , D o w n t o w n ( o r O l d T o w n ) , I r i s h To w n , a n d P e c k ' s L o t s . 20 2 3 Th e C i t y o f S S F a d o p t e d a F Y 1 7 - 1 9 C I P b u d g e t o f $ 8 3 . 6 m i l l i o n d o l l a r s w i t h pr o j e c t s s e t f o r s t r e e t r e p a i r s a n d s i d e w a l k a n d m u n i c i p a l u p g r a d e s i n t h e o l d e r re s i d e n t i a l n e i g h b o r h o o d s o f S o u t h S a n F r a n c i s c o . 3- 4 A - S u p p o r t S S F P u b l i c H o u s i n g A u t h o r i t y ( P H A ) Th e C i t y s h a l l s u p p o r t t h e S o u t h S a n Fr a n c i s c o P H A i n i t s c o n t i n u e d o p e r a t i o n an d r e n t a l o f 8 0 u n i t s o f p u b l i c h o u s i n g . 20 2 3 Th e S S F P H A c o n t i n u e s t o r e c e i v e H U D f u n d i n g s u p p o r t a n d o p e r a t e s in d e p e n d e n t l y o f t h e C i t y . 3- 4 B - E x a m i n e D i s p l a c e m e n t o f A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g an d L o w e r - I n c o m e H o u s e h o l d s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h o t h e r ju r i s d i c t i o n s i n S a n M a t e o C o u n t y , u n d e r th e u m b r e l l a o f w o r k t o b e u n d e r t a k e n b y 21 E l e m e n t s , t o q u a n t i f y , d e v e l o p a n d ev a l u a t e p o t e n t i a l s t r a t e g i e s t o a d d r e s s di s p l a c e m e n t o f l o w e r i n c o m e r e s i d e n t s . Th e C i t y w i l l u s e t h i s a n a l y s i s , i n a d d i t i o n to o t h e r a n a l y s i s , t o d e v e l o p p o t e n t i a l me a s u r e s a n d p r o g r a m s a n d t h e C i t y w i l l im p l e m e n t t h o s e p r o g r a m s , a s i t co n s i d e r s a n d d e e m s a p p r o p r i a t e , t o ad d r e s s t h e r i s k o f d i s p l a c e m e n t o f ex i s t i n g l o w e r i n c o m e 20 1 5 Th e C i t y c o n t i n u e s t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e 2 1 E l e m e n t s T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y G r o u p , wh i c h a n a l y z e d d i s p l a c e m e n t c o n c e r n s f o r S a n M a t e o C o u n t y i n 2 0 1 7 a s p a r t of t h e i r w o r k p l a n . Th e d r a f t r e p o r t w a s s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C i t y i n F e b r u a r y , 2 0 1 8 a n d h a s n o t y e t be e n r e v i e w e d f o r r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n m e a s u r e s . S t a f f w i l l re v i e w i n 2 0 1 8 b u t h a s i n c l u d e d t h e d r a f t r e p o r t s a s a t t a c h m e n t s t o t h e C i t y Co u n c i l s t a f f r e p o r t u p d a t e o n t h e 2 0 1 7 A n n u a l P r o g r e s s R e p o r t . 3- 5 A - C o n d o m i n i u m C o n v e r s i o n L i m i t a t i o n s Th e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o e n f o r c e l i m i t s on t h e c o n v e r s i o n o f a p a r t m e n t u n i t s t o co n d o m i n i u m s . A s s p e c i f i e d i n C h a p t e r 19 . 8 0 o f t h e M u n i c i p a l C o d e , co n d o m i n i u m c o n v e r s i o n s a r e a l l o w e d on l y i f t h e y m e e t t h e f o l l o w i n g g e n e r a l cr i t e r i a : 20 2 3 No r e q u e s t s o r p r e l i m i n a r y r e q u e s t s f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f a C o n d o m i n i u m Co n v e r s i o n w e r e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C i t y i n 2 0 1 7 . a. A m u l t i p l e - f a m i l y v a c a n c y r a t e o f a t le a s t f i v e p e r c e n t e x i s t s ; b. T h e c o n v e r s i o n h a s a n o v e r a l l p o s i t i v e ef f e c t o n t h e C i t y ¿ s a v a i l a b l e h o u s i n g st o c k ; c. A d e q u a t e p r o v i s i o n s a r e m a d e f o r ma i n t a i n i n g a n d m a n a g i n g t h e r e s u l t i n g co n d o m i n i u m p r o j e c t s ; d. T h e p r o j e c t m e e t s a l l b u i l d i n g , f i r e , zo n i n g , a n d o t h e r a p p l i c a b l e c o d e s i n fo r c e a t t h e ti m e o f c o n v e r s i o n ; e. T h e c o n v e r s i o n i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h a l l ap p l i c a b l e p o l i c i e s o f t h e G e n e r a l P l a n ; an d f. T h e c o n v e r s i o n c r e a t e s a t l e a s t f i v e ( 5 ) co n d o m i n i u m u n i t s . 3- 6 A - M o n i t o r A t - R i s k U n i t s Th e C i t y s h a l l m o n i t o r i t s s u p p l y o f su b s i d i z e d af f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g t o k n o w o f p o s s i b l e co n v e r s i o n s t o m a r k e t r a t e , i n c l u d i n g ta k i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t i o n s : a. P u b l i c i z e e x i s t i n g S t a t e a n d f e d e r a l no t i c e r e q u i r e m e n t s t o n o n p r o f i t de v e l o p e r s a n d pr o p e r t y o w n e r s o f a t - r i s k h o u s i n g . b. R e s p o n d t o a n y f e d e r a l a n d / o r S t a t e no t i c e s i n c l u d i n g N o t i c e o f I n t e n t t o P r e - Pa y , ow n e r P l a n s o f A c t i o n , o r O p t - O u t N o t i c e s fi l e d o n l o c a l p r o j e c t s . 20 2 3 No s u b s i d i z e d u n i t s m o n i t o r e d b y t h e C i t y o f S S F w e r e a t - r i s k o f c o n v e r s i o n t o ma r k e t r a t e i n 2 0 1 7 . 3- 6 B - A s s i s t T e n a n t s Th e C i t y s h a l l a s s i s t t e n a n t s d i s p l a c e d b y th e co n v e r s a t i o n o f a t r i s k u n i t s b y p r o v i d i n g in f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t e n a n t s ' r i g h t s , pr o v i d i n g re f e r r a l s t o r e l e v a n t s o c i a l s e r v i c e pr o v i d e r s , e n d e a v o r i n g t o e s t a b l i s h a fu n d i n g s o u r c e t o as s i s t n o n p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t s u p p o r t te n a n t s , a n d f a c i l i t a t i n g o t h e r s u p p o r t a s ap p r o p r i a t e . 20 2 3 In 2 0 1 7 , t h e r e w e r e n o a t - r i s k m a r k e t u n i t s e l i g i b l e f o r c o n v e r s i o n t o m a r k e t ra t e . T h e C i t y m a i n t a i n s o n l i n e r e s o u r c e s a n d b r o c h u r e s i n t h e E c o n o m i c a n d Co m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t t h a t d e t a i l i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t e n a n t s ' ri g h t s , s o c i a l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , a n d o t h e r s u p p o r t i n s t i t u t i o n s . 4- 1 A - R e v i e w P r o j e c t s f o r M a j o r E n v i r o n m e n t a l Ha z a r d s d u r i n g t h e E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e v i e w P r o c e s s Th e C i t y s h a l l r e v i e w r e s i d e n t i a l p r o j e c t s fo r m a j o r e n v i r o n m e n t a l h a z a r d s d u r i n g th e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e v i e w p r o c e s s . T h e Ci t y s h a l l n o t a p p r o v e t h e p r o j e c t s u n l e s s th e h a z a r d s a r e a d e q u a t e l y m i t i g a t e d . 20 2 3 Al l p r o j e c t s r e v i e w e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n a n d / o r C i t y Co u n c i l h a v e b e e n r e v i e w e d f o r c o n s i s t e n c y w i t h t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Qu a l i t y A c t . No n e . - AN N U A L E L E M E N T P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n (C C R T i t l e 2 5 § 6 2 0 2 ) Ju r i s d i c t i o n Re p o r t i n g P e r i o d Ge n e r a l C o m m e n t s : SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 01 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-168 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:4. Report regarding a resolution approving a consulting services agreement with Fehr &Peers of San Francisco, California for the East of 101 Transportation Plan in an amount not to exceed $150,000,authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, and authorizing a total budget of $150,000. (Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a consulting services agreement with Fehr &Peers of San Francisco,California for the East of 101 Transportation Plan in an amount not to exceed $150,000,authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement,and authorizing a total budget of $150,000. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION During the past five years.South San Francisco’s biotechnology cluster,located in the City’s East of 101 Area, has experienced strong economic growth.Recent development activity includes:HCP’s The Cove at Oyster Point,Genentech’s Building B-35,BioMed Realty’s Gateway of Pacific,Merck Pharmaceuticals,Verily Life Sciences,Fairfield Inn,Oyster Point Phase 1,and AC Marriott.These new developments,combined with other projects that are in the development pipeline, have raised concerns about the traffic congestion. In order to address these concerns and to better manage transportation,the City Council directed staff to solicit proposals from consultant teams to develop an East of 101 Transportation Plan (“Plan”).The development and implementation of the Plan aims to explore a range of transportation improvements in order to address current congestion, promote better urban design, and accommodate continued growth and development. On November 29,2017,staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP)for Professional Services (Attachment 1) that was distributed via email,the City’s website,and online professional services websites.Four proposals were received on the due date of December 21, 2017. After reviewing the submitted proposals,interviews were held for all four proposing consultants on January 25, 2018.The panel consisted of members from the Economic and Community Development Department and Public Works Department:Deputy Director,Principal Planner,and Senior Engineer.Proposals were evaluated based on several criteria,including:project understanding and approach,qualifications of firm and staff,and the overall presentation at the interview. Of the four proposing consultants,Fehr &Peers scored highest and is recommended by the selection panel (Attachment 2).Fehr &Peers demonstrated they have the staffing availability and expertise to provide the transportation planning services that will guide the City’s infrastructure and policy development within the East of 101 area (proposal included as Attachment 3).Staff recommends that Fehr &Peers undertake the East of 101 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-168 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:4. of 101 area (proposal included as Attachment 3).Staff recommends that Fehr &Peers undertake the East of 101 Transportation Plan based upon the firms’experience,resources,familiarity of South San Francisco,and positive references from recent similar work for the City of Redwood City. Selection of consulting services is not based on the lowest bidder,but on the firm’s expertise,experience,and references.Once the most qualified firm is determined,staff negotiates a fee proposal and any changes deemed necessary to obtain a reasonable cost for the scope of work.Because these projects are locally funded,there are no Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements. Under the proposed contract prepared by staff,the consultant would begin work immediately and complete their services by December 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this project was approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a consulting services agreement with Fehr &Peers based on their qualifications,experience,references and understanding of the project. Attachments: 1.East of 101 Transportation Plan Request for Proposals 2.Interview Evaluation Score Sheet Summary 3.Fehr & Peers Proposal City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Professional Services for: East of 101 Transportation Plan for the City of South San Francisco Date of Issue: November 29, 2017 Proposals Due: December 21, 2017 INTRODUCTION The City of South San Francisco is soliciting proposals from consultant teams to develop an East of 101 Transportation Plan. South San Francisco, like many Bay Area cities, has seen the economy rebound significantly over the past five years. With the strong economy, strategic location, updated and relocated Caltrain station (construction currently underway), and the adoption of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) in 2015, the City has also seen a substantial amount of high‐density residential and commercial development and entitlement activity within that same time period. The economic growth has resulted in increased traffic congestion and questions within the community about the anticipated impacts of development. More importantly, the City Council and community are seeking ways to better manage growth in the industrial and research development parks in the East of 101 area in order to ensure a high-quality employment environment. The development and implementation of an East of 101 Transportation Plan aims to explore a range of transportation improvements in order to address current congestion, and accommodate continued growth and development in the East of 101 area. This transportation analysis is happening in the context of a new cycle of development that is transforming the area away from inward-looking, 1990s-style office parks in favor of more dense, urban development. The City is seeking a transportation strategy that will allow this trend to continue, and to help the East of 101 area to pivot towards an urban, mixed-use, bicycle/pedestrian-friendly neighborhood. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND GOALS The City of South San Francisco is developing an East of 101 Transportation Plan to improve the quality of life for our residents and employees, focusing on reducing traffic volumes and vehicle miles traveled, improving connections between East of 101 and Downtown, and increasing the viability of multi-modal transportation options, including bicycle and pedestrian networks. The overarching goals of the East of 101 Transportation Plan are to: • Assess existing conditions of the East of 101 transportation system • Engage and better inform our stakeholders around transportation issues • Develop a coordinated multi-modal transportation strategy for East of 101 • Develop an implementation plan to monitor and guide transportation investments East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 2 RESOURCES A. East of 101 Area Plan B. South San Francisco Construction Update Map C. Bicycle Master Plan D. Pedestrian Master Plan E. Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) F. Transportation Demand Management Ordinance East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 3 Figure 1: East of 101 Area East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 4 PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK South San Francisco seeks transportation planning and engineering teams with expertise in multimodal transportation planning and design. A preliminary scope of work for the project is outlined below. Upon selection of the highest‐rated team, the City will collaborate with the team to develop a final scope of work, schedule, and budget that best meets the needs of South San Francisco and the project goals. The final scope of work could deviate from what is presented in this RFP based on this collaborative process. 1. Review and Analyze Existing Transportation Systems a) Review City transportation policies and programs b) Land Use policies / regulations c) Multimodal transportation networks d) Volumes and deficiencies e) Audit representative, recent development projects and active applications f) Collision trends and locations g) Parking supply and demand 1. Traffic Model Coordination a) Close coordination with the City’s traffic model consultant on the East of 101 Traffic model (recently updated in November, 2017) 2. Transportation engineering standards, design guidelines, and code requirements a) Review existing regulations b) Update standards / requirements, based on East of 101 area needs and projected development patterns c) Develop South San Francisco-specific guidelines for transportation impact analyses, including recommendations for incorporating Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Level of Service (LOS) 3. Develop Performance Monitoring Program a) Transportation System Performance measures b) Prioritization criteria and scoring system for transportation improvement projects c) Project Monitoring program 4. Identify Transportation Plan: Projects & Programs a) Evaluate / assess previously identified projects and programs b) Identify new projects and programs, based on: • Criteria / scoring system • Stakeholder input • Analysis of gaps/deficiencies in existing networks • Existing and future development patterns c) Update / develop project cost estimates (planning level) d) Prioritize projects & programs for implementation East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 5 i. Ranked list of transportation projects and programs e) Transportation Implementation plan, including: i. Schedule of improvements ii. Funding strategy iii. Process for reviewing / updating rankings over an identified interval (2-3 years) 5. Outreach a) East of 101 Stakeholder Engagement i. Major Employers / Landowners Stakeholder interviews i. Focus Groups ii. Online survey / engagement tool b) Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) c) Planning Commission & City Council Study Sessions 6. Additional Project / Consultant Coordination a) Coordinate with ongoing transportation studies / projects in the East of 101 Area b) Interface with other land use and planning studies c) Consider impacts of entitlement projects on overall study, as requested Product The East of 101 Transportation Plan product should include a list of identified and prioritized projects and programs that will help to support multi-modal transportation in the East of 101 area. It is envisioned that this prioritized list will be used to develop Capital Improvement Program projects. The Transportation Plan should be focused on implementation, and should include an action plan that clearly delineates City steps and actions needed to implement short- term and long-term transportation improvement projects. SCHEDULE South San Francisco expects the work to commence in February, 2018 and be completed by November, 2018 BUDGET South San Francisco has budgeted up to one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) for this effort. East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 6 SELECTION TIMELINE* November 29, 2017 RFP Available December 21, 2017, 4:00 PM Submission deadline for Proposals Week of January 8, 2018 Interviews with highest ranked proposers (if necessary) Subsequent to selection, a final fee and scope of work will be prepared and presented to City Council for consideration (likely January/February, 2018.) * Interview and award dates are subject to change before or after the closing date of the RFP. East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 7 PROPOSAL FORMAT Each proposal must include the following: Project Understanding and Approach This section should clearly convey the Proposer’s understanding of the nature of the work and the general approach to be taken, and identify any specific considerations that are unique to South San Francisco and the East of 101 area’s transportation concerns and challenges. Proposed Scope of Work Provide an outline of major work tasks, including timeline and deliverables. Proposers are encouraged to use the preliminary scope of work in this RFP as a starting point, and provide suggestions and recommendations to best achieve the goals of the transportation plan. Firm Qualifications and Experience Provide a detailed statement describing the Proposer’s qualifications and experience relevant to the project. Staff Qualifications and Experience Identify the individual proposed as the Project Manager, and the relevant experience and role of that individual. Include resumes of key staff expected to participate in the project (including those of subconsultants). Similar Projects Provide information regarding similar projects the Proposer (and its subconsultants) completed in relation to the project scope. Examples should demonstrate Proposer’s experience with at least three projects substantially similar to the tasks described in this RFP, completed in the past seven years. Examples of representative projects should have an emphasis on Bay Area and San Mateo County experience. Budget Budget breakdown of major tasks, and direct costs. Client References List a minimum of three client references attesting to Proposer’s previous experience in performing work substantially similar to activities included in the preliminary scope of work. At least one reference shall be for a project with the proposed Project Manager. East of 101 Transportation Plan: Request for Proposals Page 8 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please submit four copies of your proposal and an electronic copy in PDF format to: Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner Planning Division, City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 If you have specific questions, please call (650) 877-8535, or email tony.rozzi@ssf.net. E101 Transportation Study Consultant Interviews Rating Summary CRITERIA MAX POINTS Ra t e r 1 Ra t e r 2 Ra t e r 3 To t a l Ra t e r 1 Ra t e r 2 Ra t e r 3 To t a l Ra t e r 1 Ra t e r 2 Ra t e r 3 To t a l Ra t e r 1 Ra t e r 2 Ra t e r 3 To t a l Project Understanding 40 34 30 35 99 38 35 40 113 37 30 35 102 35 30 35 100 Qualifications of Firm and Staff 25 21 20 15 56 24 25 25 74 24 25 25 74 22 20 20 62 Presentation At Interview 35 28 25 30 83 33 35 30 98 31 30 30 91 30 20 30 80 Total 100 83 75 80 238 95 95 95 285 92 85 90 267 87 70 85 242 TJKM Fehr & Peers Kittleson/Nelson Nygaard DKS/Alta AProposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan EAST OF 101 TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO’S DECEMBER 21, 2017 B 332 Pine Street | 4th Floor | San Francisco, CA 94104 | (415) 348-0300 | Fax (415) 773-1790www.fehrandpeers.com December 21, 2017 Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner Planning Division, City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Subject: Proposal for the South San Francisco East of 101 Transportation Plan Dear Mr. Rozzi: Fehr & Peers is delighted to submit this proposal to continue our valued relationship with the City of South San Francisco. We enjoy working with the City on a range of projects and hope to continue with such a successful experience. You will find our team to be exceptionally well qualified in the broad range of technical specialties required to develop an innovative and effective East of 101 Transportation Plan. In particular, our firm offers the following: Detailed knowledge of the East of 101 Area Our recent collaborations with the City on the Downtown Plan, Pedestrian Plan, East of 101 Model review, and various land use projects have given us a thorough understanding of the opportunities and challenges facing the area. Quantification of travel markets and mode shift potential We are the industry leader in applying Big Data and market research to understand travel patterns and the effects of transportation demand management strategies. Our robust analytical approach will allow us to identify and quantify effective strategies to manage vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. Implementation-focused approach Our team of experts will help the City navigate changing conditions of transit, complete streets, autonomous ii vehicles, and CEQA to realize a multimodal vision for the East of 101 area. Our staff capabilities in planning, design, operations, and modeling will help this process deliver projects for implementation in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. Our leadership team will be comprised of Eric Womeldorff, Daniel Jacobson, and Matt Haynes, who will be supported by a highly experienced team of experts in their respective fields. Through our recent work with the City and its public and private sector partners, we have demonstrated the ability to add value through strategic thinking, an informed perspective, thorough technical analysis, and clear communication. We hope that you find that our proposal demonstrates our unique ability to work collaboratively with a range of diverse stakeholders to help improve mobility options. If you have any questions, please call me at (415) 685-4022. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, FEHR & PEERS Eric Womeldorff, PE Principal In Charge and San Francisco Office Leader TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH ....1 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK........................7 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE .....13 BUDGET & SCHEDULE ................................18 CLIENT REFERENCES .................................20 RESUMES ......................................APPENDIX 1Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH ....1 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK........................7 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE .....13 BUDGET & SCHEDULE ................................18 CLIENT REFERENCES .................................20 RESUMES ......................................APPENDIX PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH1Our Understanding South San Francisco stands out among Bay Area cities for its commitment to economic growth, transit-oriented development, and innovation. Over the past decade, the City has accelerated a dynamic transformation with the revitalization of downtown and continued growth of biotechnology companies in the East of 101 area. This transformation, coupled with regional growth, prompted a need to update the City’s transportation plans. The East of 101 Transportation Plan will provide a vision for leveraging the City’s resources to expand transportation choices and accommodating the next chapter of growth. The plan will build upon a strong foundation of previous and ongoing plans and programs, which includes the City’s TDM ordinance, Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, traffic model, Caltrain station relocation project, and Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans, as well as partnerships with Scoop, Limebike, Spin, Commute. org, WETA, and Caltrain. While the City and its partners have been successful in establishing this foundation, constrained public right-of-way and limited financial resources necessitate creative solutions to continue increasing person throughput while at the same time managing vehicle trips. 2 An effective, actionable plan necessitates a detailed understanding of current and future land use and transportation conditions as they relate to changes to CEQA and transportation innovations. Through our work in South San Francisco and elsewhere along the Peninsula, we have developed a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges facing the East of 101 area: Current Conditions The East of 101 area is an international hub for biotechnology and a regional hub for manufacturing and warehousing. Home to over 25,000 employees, the area includes a mix of major office and R&D campuses (such as Genentech, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Life Technologies Corporation, and Amgen) as well as other light industrial, warehouse, and manufacturing facilities. While most of the area is comprised of traditional suburban office parks, a number of multi-story, mixed-use campuses have recently been constructed. Estimated based on 2016 data from Genentech, Caltrain, BART, WETA, and SamTrans. Commute.org shuttle ridership included in BART and Caltrain to- tals. Genenbus excludes ridership also associated with BART and Caltrain. DAILY TRANSIT TRIPS IN EAST OF 101 AREA SamTrans7% BART9% Ferry12% Caltrain14% Genenbus58% (4,300 TRIPS) 3Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan Transportation infrastructure in the East of 101 area is largely oriented around driving; consequently, a majority of employees drive alone to work. A majority of peak period trips originate in San Mateo County, while San Francisco, the East Bay, and Santa Clara County account for the remainder. Traffic congestion is most heavily concentrated near US-101 along Grand Avenue, Oyster Point Boulevard, and Airport Boulevard. While many employees drive, there is also a significant amount of transit use. The East of 101 area accounts for approximately 4,300 transit passengers per day, including both public transit and Genenbus trips. 2016-2040 NON-RESIDENTIAL GROWTH (13 MSF) Future Development The East of 101 area is expected to undergo considerable growth over the next two decades. Four major projects totaling approximately two million square feet are currently under construction (The Cove, Genesis Campus, Merck Campus, and Genentech Building 40), while the City expects an additional 11 million square feet plus of employment growth and 2,000 housing units plus to occur over the next two decades (including both the East of 101 and downtown areas). This development will bring an estimated 20,000 employees and 4,000 residents to the area – potentially more, pending the approval of the Oyster Point Specific Plan Update. This growth is expected to shift the area’s land use mix toward more office and R&D uses. The East of 101 and downtown areas are expected to add 13 million square feet of office, R&D, industrial, and other nonresidential space over the next two decades. Source: SSF Model. 2016 LAND USE (22 MSF) Other9% Industrial37% Office/R&D58%Other12% Industrial11% Office/R&D77% Implications of SB-743 SB-743 replaces level of service (LOS) with vehicle miles traveled as a basis for determining significant impacts for projects in California. To comply with SB 743, the City will need to make a series of decisions about how to change current transportation impact analysis and shift to the use of VMT. The City will need to address questions related to VMT analysis methodologies, thresholds, and feasible mitigation measures. As part of the decision making process, the following questions deserve special attention: 1. Does the City want to follow the VMT analysis recommendations developed by the Office of Planning and Research (OPR, November 2017) for SB 743 implementation or take a different approach? 2. How should VMT analysis be coordinated across the air quality, energy, greenhouse gas, and transportation sections of CEQA environmental documents for the general plan and subsequent projects? 4 If the City chooses to adopt OPR’s recommendations, residential development within the East of 101 area would be under the regional VMT thresholds under 2020 and 2040 conditions. However, the office, R&D and industrial projects within the East of 101 area would be approximately 40 percent above the regional threshold, triggering a significant impact (except projects within ½ mile of the Caltrain station or ferry terminal, which would be geographically exempt). Such projects would need to identify mitigation measures which have been shown to reduce their VMT (e.g. TDM). Several Fehr & Peers staff on this project, including Ron Milam and Teresa Whinery, have played a key role in advising OPR and cities like South San Francisco in implementing SB-743 and quantifying the effectiveness of TDM measures for use in CEQA documents. ESTIMATED 2020 AND 2040 VMT PER CAPITA - MTC REGIONAL MODEL LOCATION 2020 VMT PER CAPITA 2040 VMT PER CAPITA Employees Residents Employees Residents East of 101 Area 25.8 11.7 23.9 11.3 Regional Average (Regional Threshold -15%) 21.8 (18.5) 15.0 (12.8) 20.3 (17.0) 13.8 (11.8) East of 101, Percent Above/Below Threshold +39%-9%+41%-4% Source: MTC, 2017 5Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan Transportation Opportunities and Challenges The future of the East of 101 area will be shaped by its ability to capitalize on its transportation assets and opportunities in a manner that prioritizes limited resources and effectively responds to stakeholder needs. A range of solutions are possible: implementing planned auto capacity improvements at key intersections, extending Railroad Avenue, and reconstructing the Produce/ Utah Avenue interchange; investing in complete streets projects to improve walkability and bikeability; enhancing Caltrain, ferry, shuttle, and SamTrans services; subsidizing shared mobility services like Scoop and Limebike/Spin; increasing housing supply; and organizing individual TDM programs under a district-wide transportation management agency (TMA). Each possible solution presents opportunities and challenges. Moreover, given the City’s finite resources and right-of-way, financial and operational tradeoffs will be necessary in prioritizing various projects. Project Approach Fehr & Peers is uniquely positioned to lead the East of 101 Transportation Plan. We have a deep understanding of the City through our past work that has spanned over three decades. We also offer an in-depth understanding of transportation trends facing the City and the region. Unlike many other firms, we devote a significant portion of our time and energy to R&D efforts, which have led to breakthroughs in understanding what influences travel behavior, as well as the development of unique tools such as our MainStreet mixed-use trip generation model, Trendlab+ forecasting tool, and modeling efforts to understand the transportation network effects of autonomous vehicle. We will leverage this unique understanding and experience to execute a clear approach: >Establish a guiding vision for the City to address the transportation challenges of the future based on meaningful engagement of staff, key stakeholders, and the broader community MAXIMIZING CALTRAIN’S POTENTIAL Improvements to the South San Francsico Caltrain station presents an excit- ing opportunity to capitalize on faster, more frequent, and more accessible electrified rail service. For example, by combining robust Caltrain service with a strong TDM program and shuttle service, Stanford University has achieved a 20 percent Caltrain mode share for its approximately 30,000 employees. However, significant investments in station access are needed to realize the station’s full ridership potential, and Caltrain is constrained on the amount of service it can provide. Fehr & Peers has worked extensively with Caltrain to refine its ridership model and analyze station access needs. Tasks 4 and 5 will quantify the potential market of existing and future Caltrain riders to assess station area and shuttle improvements. 6 >Quantify current and future transportation performance using metrics that reflect the values of South San Francisco >Identify forward-thinking transportation strategies that enables South San Francisco to capitalize on its assets and ongoing innovations in the marketplace >Evaluate and prioritize transportation improvements based on performance metrics and goals >Develop an implementation plan that clearly identifies funding sources and next steps with respect to SB-743 and the General Plan update While we have crafted our approach with these factors in mind, a critical first step in this project will be to initiate a conversation with the City and stakeholders to fully understand key issues. Therefore, this approach remains flexible so that we can be responsive to the City’s priorities. EXISTING BICYCLE LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) seeks to measure how stress is experienced by bicyclists riding in various street conditions. Developed by the Mineta Transportation Institute, the methodology ranks streets from LTS 1 (low stress, serves all ages and abilities) to LTS 4 (high stress, serves only fearless bicyclists). Currently, the East of 101 area can be accessed only via high stress LTS 4 facilities, limiting bicycle commuting and recreational use of the Bay Trail. 7Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK2Fehr & Peers has prepared a scope of work tailored to our understanding of the East of 101 area and consistent with recent successful efforts for comparable cities like Redwood City. This scope of work intends to be fully responsive to the RFP and recent conversations with City staff, while also providing several enhancements to deliver an implementable plan with quantifiable outcomes. We look forward to refining this scope through further conversations with the City. Task 1: Project Management & Coordination (RFP Tasks 1 and 6) Fehr & Peers will facilitate an in-person kickoff meeting with City staff to review the project schedule, scope of work, and data needs, as well as our approach to community and stakeholder engagement. We will facilitate biweekly project management calls over the course of the project with City staff. We assume up to five in-person project management meetings in addition to the outreach efforts discussed in Task 2. Fehr & Peers will prepare meeting agendas, notes, and action items. 8 2. CONCEPT REVIEW We will review current performance (Task 4) and potential improvement concepts (Task 5) with the Stakeholder Advisory Group as well as the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. We will seek input to confirm that these concepts align with the community vision and goals identified in Task 3. Over the course of the study, we will continue our coordination efforts with ongoing transportation and land use projects in the East of 101 area, including the City Traffic Model, Caltrain Station relocation, TDM monitoring program, Oyster Point and Genentech plans, and various street improvements. DELIVERABLES >Facilitation of five in-person meetings and biweekly coordination calls Task 2: Community and Stakeholder Engagement (RFP Task 5) Fehr & Peers will collaborate with the City to conduct community and stakeholder outreach. Outreach will occur in three phases: 1. COMMUNITY VISION & GOALS In coordination with Task 3, we will convene a Stakeholder Advisory Group with major employers and landowners and administer an online survey and webmap to seek input on the plan’s vision and goals. 3. PLAN REVIEW Upon completion of a draft plan, we will participate in a third round of outreach to the Stakeholder Advisory Group, Planning Commission, and City Council to review the draft recommendation of the plan. DELIVERABLES >Online survey and webmap results; participation in eight meetings (three 9Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group meetings, one Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting, two Planning Commission meetings, and two City Council meetings) >Summary of community engagement results in South San Francisco based on surveys, meetings, and interactive webmap. Task 3: Vision, Goals, and Performance Measures (RFP Task 3) At the project kickoff meeting and initial stakeholder outreach meeting, Fehr & Peers will lead visioning workshops to identify goals and performance measures for the study. We will facilitate three key exercises during these workshops: TRENDLAB+ City staff and stakeholders will forecast how changing trends may affect future travel patterns using our Trendlab+ tool. Trendlab+ allows staff to input expectations of economic growth, fuel prices, autonomous vehicles, TNCs, vehicle ownership rates, and other factors to explore how various issues (known and unknown) may influence travel in the future. This exercise will serve as a starting point for identifying goals and performance measures in the East of 101 area. VALUES AND PRIORITIES ASSESSMENT City staff and stakeholders will participate in a values and priorities assessment to identify what type of environment they want to create, avoid, and preserve in the East of 101 area. Concurrently, Fehr & Peers will work with the City and stakeholders to distribute an online values survey that features a similar set of questions as well as an interactive webmap to identify improvements consistent with this vision. The values assessment will help inform the problem statement and clear, specific goals and performance measures such that proposed transportation strategies can be directly evaluated against what is important to the City and community. Our Trendlab+ tool enables City staff and the Stakeholder Advisory Group to test how transportation trends may affect future VMT. 10 DRAFT PROBLEM STATEMENT BRAINSTORMING SESSION City staff and stakeholders will formulate a draft problem statement based on the discussion of values, priorities, and trends. Based on the results of the project kickoff meeting and initial stakeholder outreach efforts, Fehr & Peers will refine the problem statement and develop a set of goals and performance measures. We expect the performance measures will cover key metrics such as person throughput, mode share, VMT, and safety. We will submit a draft goals and performance measures chapter to the City for review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). DELIVERABLES >Draft Goals and Performance Measures Chapter Task 4: Review and Analyze Existing & Future Transportation Systems (RFP Task 2) Fehr & Peers will review existing and future transportation conditions to establish baseline performance measures for the East of 101 area. Existing and future baselines will inform the identification and evaluation of projects and programs in Task 5. Our extensive local knowledge of current conditions and future plans in the East of 101 area will help us synthesize this information and effectively communicate opportunities and challenges. We will review, analyze, and map current and future transportation system performance. This analysis will build upon the City’s previous plans, traffic model, and other available data sources. With the exception of purchasing additional Streetlight Location-Based Services data, we will not conduct additional data collection. We will analyze the following: ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS >Current and planned bicycle network >Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress >Current sidewalk gaps and planned pedestrian improvements >Bicycle and pedestrian injury collisions data (past five years) VEHICLE CONDITIONS >Existing and future street volumes and capacities at the district’s four main gateways – Oyster Point Boulevard, Grand Avenue, Airport Boulevard, and Utah Avenue >Freight & goods movement routes >Vehicle injury collisions (past five years) TRANSIT CONDITIONS >Transit routes, stops, and stations >Transit frequency, ridership, and productivity LAND USE CONDITIONS >Projected future land use growth >Presence of TDM programs and current performance TRAVEL PATTERNS >Mode Shares: Existing AM and PM peak period mode shares for employees (using transit ridership data, the City’s 2016 counts, and available survey information) >Origin-Destination Patterns: Existing origin and destination patterns for employees and projected future patterns for residents (using Streetlight location-based services data) >VMT: 2020 and 2040 daily VMT per capita for employees and potential residents (using the MTC Model) We will assess the implications of key regional transportation projects and transportation 11Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan >Transportation demand management program enhancements, such as creation of an East of 101 Transportation Management Agency (TMA), stronger monitoring of the City’s TDM ordinance, and implementation of new strategies such as subsidies for Scoop, LimeBike/Spin, or shared Uber/Lyft rides >Transit improvements, such as the expansion of Caltrain, ferry, shuttle, and SamTrans services as well as changes to Caltrain, ferry, and bus facilities >Street circulation and active transportation upgrades, such as the Produce/Utah Avenue interchange, Railroad Avenue extension, intelligent transportation systems (ITS), low stress bikeways, and other improvements identified in recent plans >Land use scenarios, such as mixed-use office or housing developments Fehr & Peers will evaluate these projects and programs using performance measures identified in Task 3. We will evaluate up to 15 projects and programs with up to eight performance measures. We will quantify potential costs, person throughput, mode shifts, and VMT reductions for each strategy under a near-term and long-term innovations on the East of 101 area. We will consider how the Caltrain electrification, the US- 101 Managed Lanes, California High Speed Rail projects, autonomous vehicles, TNCs, and private ferry services may affect travel patterns. Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Baseline Conditions chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). DELIVERABLES >Draft Baseline Conditions Chapter Task 5: Identify and Evaluate Transportation Projects and Programs (RFP Task 4) Fehr & Peers will work with City staff and stakeholders to identify projects and programs which address the problem statement and goals of the study. We will identify these projects and programs based on previous plans, our Task 4 analysis, and direction from City staff, the Stakeholder Advisory Group, and community feedback (Task 2). Based on preliminary analysis that we’ve conducted, we expect the City may consider possible projects and programs including: horizon year, incorporating our understanding of local travel models and the latest research from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. We will qualitatively assess possible risks and multimodal tradeoffs for each project or program. The resulting list of prioritized projects will inform the Implementation Plan (Task 6). We will summarize the results in a draft Transportation Strategies Evaluation chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). DELIVERABLES >Draft Transportation Strategies Evaluation Chapter Task 6: Implementation Plan (RFP Task 4) Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to develop an implementation plan for priority projects and programs identified in Task 5. The implementation plan will consider funding options, project schedules, and monitoring. We will specifically identify strategies which the City can implement on its own (such as changes to policies, 12 transportation impact fees, or street typologies), and strategies where the City will need to work with its partner agencies and stakeholders to move forward (such as expansions in Caltrain service or formation of a TMA). The implementation plan will also determine how the City seeks to implement SB-743, including its preferred analysis approach, forecasting methodology, thresholds, and coordination approach across CEQA disciplines. Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Implementation chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). DELIVERABLES >Draft Implementation Chapter Task 7: Documentation Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft East of 101 Transportation Plan for the City’s review. We intend for the plan to be concise and graphically- oriented for a non-technical audience, building upon the interim deliverables of Tasks 2-6. We will respond to one round of consolidated comments prior to submitting a final plan. Possible Optional Tasks Fehr & Peers is prepared to support the City in a range of additional tasks that may arise during the plan. Such tasks could include: >Conceptual design of street improvements, such as changes to Grand Avenue or access to the relocated Caltrain Station >Traffic operations simulations of street or intersection improvements >Updates to the East of 101 model to incorporate transportation or land use changes >Renderings of proposed improvements >Development of a project website >Implementation of pop-up events or quick- build projects >Updates to the City’s TDM ordinance or monitoring program We are happy to incorporate any of these tasks depending on needs of the City during the scoping process or as an amendment at a later time. Performance Evaluation from the Redwood City City- wide Transportation Plan conducted by Fehr & Peers 13Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan FIRM QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE3About Fehr & Peers Fehr & Peers is a multimodal transportation planning and engineering firm headquartered in the Bay Area, providing a breadth of services to public and private clients since 1985. We use the latest research and innovative technology to engage and improve communities through our projects, using our knowledge to develop implementable plans and policy that address the needs of all transportation system users. Fehr & Peers expertise in multimodal master planning encompasses decades of knowledge and innovation. Our engineers, planners, and analysts collaborate using state-of-the-art technology to clarify issues, devise solutions, and create implementation programs. We offer our clients the right combination of leading- edge technical skills and extensive knowledge of the communities in which we work to deliver comprehensive solutions and superior client service. South San Francisco & Peninsula Experience Fehr & Peers has worked extensively with the City of South San Francisco on transportation planning and engineering projects over the past 30 years. Our 14 Nationally Recognized Expertise Fehr & Peers staff routinely publish original research, serve on national committees, and teach courses to others in the industry. We do this while maintaining our commitment to translating those techniques into practical solutions. We recently served as advisors to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research on the development of SB-743. Our staff has also performed research, formulated innovation strategies, and re-defined best practices for the California Air Resources Board, Caltrans, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Department of Transportation, Transportation Research Board, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Institute of Transportation Engineers, American Public Transit Association and others. Implementation-Oriented Plans Fehr & Peers is committed to developing effective and innovative transportation solutions that improve communities – it is part of our mission statement. One of our main goals is providing innovative technical solutions that complement each community’s values in order to plan for sustainable developments that will thrive experience within the City spans strategic planning, CEQA studies, multimodal operations analysis, street design, modeling, transportation demand management plans, and the General Plan. We are currently working on several development projects within the City – most notably the Genentech Master Plan and Oyster Point Master Plan – and were recently selected as the lead transportation consultant for the Civic Campus project. We have completed several recent plans with the City including the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan and the Pedestrian Master Plan. Our public and private sector experience provides credibility among the range of East of 101 stakeholders and partners. Fehr & Peers is at the forefront of addressing the Peninsula’s complex transportation challenges and developing innovative multimodal solutions. Our experience spans working with local cities (e.g. Redwood City, Foster City, and Mountain View, transit agencies (e.g. Caltrain, BART, and SamTrans) employers (e.g. Stanford University, Facebook, and Google), and developers. By understanding opportunities and best practices in key areas such as transit, TDM, CEQA, and multimodal design and operations, we are positioned to help South San Francisco build upon successful efforts of its peers. long-term. With tailored projects to suit each community we work in, we endeavor to create great infrastructure, programs, services, and developments. An important part of this philosophy is collaborating with communities and our clients to create these customized solutions. Our plans and designs are both visionary and implementation- focused. Our commitment to both elements assists our clients in phasing projects and having robust plans for successful near-term and long-term outcomes. Because we provide services ranging from master planning to plans, specifications, grant writing, and design (PS&E), we are often involved in all stages of a project from initial ideas to concepts to construction drawings. As a result, our transportation plans have a high degree of rigor. Citywide transportation projects are not just lines on a network map – they are fundable, feasible projects that regional agencies and local jurisdictions can successfully take on with community support. 15Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan Staff Qualifications and Experience Fehr & Peers has assembled a team transportation experts to help revision transportation in the East of 101 area, including three Principals and one South San Francisco native. Our team will be supplemented by our company’s resources of over 200 transportation engineers and planners. Eric Womeldorff, P.E. will serve as Principal- In-Charge. Eric offers extensive experience overseeing complex transportation and land use projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, including major efforts for the University of California-San Matt Haynes and Ron Milam will serve as Principal technical advisors, offering their expertise in multimodal transportation planning for cities across California. Matt has led similar citywide transportation planning efforts in cities such as Redwood City, Ventura, Monterey, and San Jose. Ron is an expert in CEQA and has assisted OPR and cities across California implement SB-743. Sarah Nadiranto Chan, Teresa Whinery, Drew Levitt, and Mike Hawkins will support the development of the plan. Sarah, Teresa, Drew, and Mike bring extensive experience working on the Peninsula on a range of similar planning and engineering projects. Their expertise in multimodal design, operations, TDM, and data analytics provides the City with a technically robust team to produce the Plan. Francisco, Stanford University, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, and San Francisco Planning Department. He also dedicates a large amount of his time to staying on top of TDM and transportation innovations. Eric will oversee Fehr & Peers’ work to ensure a thorough and technically rigorous master plan. Daniel Jacobson will serve as project manager. Daniel offers extensive experience in strategic transportation planning in South San Francisco and the Peninsula, including projects such as the Genentech Master Plan, Stanford University Transportation Plan, Caltrain Station Management Toolkit, and the SamTrans Express Bus Study. Daniel will be the primary point of contact for the City and will manage staff resources, schedule, and budget. 16 Similar Projects Fehr & Peers has led a variety of transportation plans for cities facing similar challenges to South San Francisco, summarized below. REDWOOD CITY CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN While building upon Redwood City’s robust and sustainable transportation system, the new Citywide Transportation Plan reflects changing community needs and goals. Fehr & Peers collaborated with the City to establish a framework for a balanced multimodal transportation network addressing the City’s transportation challenges and needs. The plan features a vision for safe and efficient mobility that minimizes environmental and neighborhood impacts and provides a strategic, innovative, and solutions-oriented approach to transportation can meet the mobility needs of all. As the prime consultant, Fehr & Peers managed the plan’s development, led the community and stakeholder evaluation process, and identified and evaluated potential projects. Our deliverable provided a concise, visual, actionable blueprint to help the City implement key improvements. UCSF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLANNING Fehr & Peers has led the majority of UCSF’s transportation planning and engineering studies over the past decade as it has expanded its medical, educational, and R&D facilities across San Francisco. We have analyzed how various land use options would affect the surrounding neighborhoods and transportation systems. They included analyses of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic flows around and within the sites as well as transit, UCSF shuttles, and connections to regional transit, such as BART and Caltrain. Fehr & Peers also prepared and forecasted the effectiveness of campus-specific TDM strategies to reduce travel demand to and from the campuses while taking into consideration UCSF’s already robust TDM program and low drive-alone mode share. This included strategies to reduce trip making to net zero at one of UCSF’s largest campuses. Our work has supported UCSF’s continued growth to over 25,000 employees and 6,000 students without substantially increasing vehicle trips. CITY OF LOS ANGELES MOBILITY PLAN 2035 (LA2B) Despite its car-centric reputation, the City of Los Angeles recently took on several ambitious planning efforts that envision a new way of moving around the City. Recognizing the challenges of achieving complete streets that provide access for all Angelenos, the City of Los Angeles Planning and Transportation departments selected Fehr & Peers to lead the Mobility Element update, branded by the team as “LA2B.” Building on a multifaceted public engagement process, including mayoral-level leadership and extensive social media and community outreach, Fehr & Peers and the City pioneered a layered network concept for complete streets, an approach particularly well suited to built out cities like Los Angeles. While all modes can coexist on a given street, layered networks enhance a particular mode on a street to ensure that there are great for transit, bicycling, pedestrians, and drivers. Enhancements include peak period bus 17Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan lanes on transit enhanced streets, buffered bike lanes on bicycle enhanced streets, and signal coordination on vehicle enhanced streets. The Fehr & Peers team also helped translate this transformative mobility vision into on-the-streets implementation. A Complete Streets Design Guide identifies improvements associated with street priorities and addresses the disconnect between mobility goals and existing street standards. We led the environmental process supporting plan adoption, including leveraging the City’s innovative Travel Demand Model (developed by Fehr & Peers) to quantify performance measures that show the environmental and mobility benefits of LA2B. This project won the 2016 APA Los Angeles award for Transportation Planning. North Bayshore Precise Plan and Gateway Analysis Fehr & Peers prepared the transportation impact analysis (TIA) for the North Bayshore Precise Plan, which will add 3.4 million square feet of office, research and development space, hotel, and retail uses to the tech company-heavy North Bayshore area. With only three vehicle gateways and two multi- use paths into and out of North Bayshore, access by all modes of transportation is key contribution, we quantitatively determined peak hour vehicle capacity for each gateway, which then served as the basis for evaluating the Plan’s impacts and defining a morning peak period trip cap used to monitor if the area is achieving its goal to reduce vehicle trips. As part of the analysis, Fehr & Peers also updated and applied the City of Mountain View travel demand model and identified impacts and mitigation for the intersections, freeways, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit facilities and service. The resulting study was incorporated directly into the Precise Plan environmental impact report (EIR). After the Precise Plan adoption in December 2014, a subsequent study commenced to evaluate and prioritize specific transportation improvements in the North Bayshore area. Fehr & Peers is leading this effort. South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Fehr & Peers supported the City of South San Francisco in preparing its Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. The plan defines the principles and framework for development in the downtown area and supporting infrastructure improvements. Fehr & Peers led the transportation elements of the Specific Plan, including community outreach support, existing conditions analysis, parking assessment, pedestrian design guidelines, concept development for street redesigns and transportation analysis for the Environmental Impact Report. The plan overlaps the East of 101 area and identifies enhancements to better connect the area with downtown and Caltrain. 18 BUDGET & SCHEDULE4Fehr & Peers’ cost proposal for the Scope of Work described in Part I Technical Proposal is provided below. The total cost of services is $150,000. Our cost proposal is based on our expected level of effort to complete each of the tasks identified in the detailed work plan times the hourly billing rate of each employee that is expected to work on this project. Billing rates have been established for each staff person that incorporates their direct costs, including salary and benefits, general office overhead, and company profit. Other direct costs that are included in our scope of work include the cost of travel, data purchasing, and data collection. We propose to invoice monthly on a time-and-materials basis for work performed during the prior month. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to the opportunity to discuss our project approach and expected level of effort. 19Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan Proposed Fee TASK ESTIMATED HOURS LABOR COSTS DIRECT COSTS TOTAL COSTS 1 Project Management and Coordination 105 $18,900 $1,200 $20,100 2. Community and Stakeholder Engagement 135 $21,400 $1,300 $22,700 3. Vision, Goals, and Performance Measures 40 $6,300 $400 $6,700 4. Review and Analyze Existing & Future Transportation Systems 140 $20,100 $4,1001 $24,200 5. Identify and Evaluate Transportation Projects and Programs 215 $35,600 $1,800 $37,400 6. Implementation Plan 100 $17,200 $900 $18,100 7. Documentation 135 $19,800 $1,000 $20,800 Total 870 $139,300 $10,700 $150,000 1Includes the cost of Streetlight data to analyze vehicle person trip origins Proposed Schedule TASK FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV 1 Project Management and Coordination 2. Community and Stakeholder Engagement 3. Vision, Goals, and Performance Measures 4. Review and Analyze Existing & Future Transportation Systems 5. Identify and Evaluate Transportation Projects and Programs 6. Implementation Plan 7. Documentation 20 CLIENT REFERENCES5REDWOOD CITY CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Client & Reference Jessica Manzi, Senior Transportation Coordinator City of Redwood City T: (650) 780-7372 E: jmanzi@redwoodcity.org Firm’s Role & Responsibilities Fehr & Peers prepared a Citywide Transportation Plan for Redwood City to develop a safe and efficient multi- modal transportation system. Key Staff Matt Haynes Status Project ongoing, expected completion 2018 Budget $419,000 SAMTRANS EXPRESS BUS STUDY Client & Reference Daniel Shockley, Planner SamTrans T: (650) 508-6382 E: shockleyd@samtrans.com Firm’s Role & Responsibilities Fehr & Peers is evaluating express bus routes for SamTrans along the US-101 corridor in San Mateo, San Francisco, and Santa Clara Counties using big data and the C/CAG model. Key Staff Daniel Jacobson and Drew Levitt Status Project ongoing, expected completion 2018 Budget $180,000 UCSF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION Client & Reference Tammy Chan, Senior Planner UCSF T: (415) 476-9627 E: Tammy.Chan@ucsf.edu Firm’s Role & Responsibilities Fehr & Peers has supported UCSF in identifying and evaluating improvements to its TDM program based on extensive survey efforts and research. Key Staff Eric Womeldorff and Teresa Whinery Status Project ongoing, expected completion 2018 Budget >$100,000 21Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan RESUMESA 22 demand and transit operations, equity, disabled access, customer experience, curb management, and greenhouse gas emissions. The white papers developed through this effort will help the City assess possible policy options and provide the public with more information on the benefits and impacts of TNC operations. SFMTA Sustainable Streets Division On-Call Transportation Consulting (San Francisco, CA) Eric is serving as Principal-In-Charge of projects through our on-call transportation consulting contract with the SFMTA’s Sustainable Streets Division. Through this contract, the SFMTA relies on Fehr & Peers to take the lead on some of SFMTA’s most challenging technically and analytically multimodal projects. UCSF Transportation Consulting (San Francisco, CA) Along with José Farran of Adavant Consulting, Eric serves as the de facto on-call transportation consultant for UCSF. Together, they led the transportation component for the UCSF Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) EIR and the UCSF Physical Options Study that preceded it. Additional work for UCSF includes advising UCSF’s Campus leaders as how best to update their already sterling TDM offerings for students, employees, and visitors (this process kicked off in Q 2017). ABOUT Eric has a keen understanding of the dynamic between land use and transportation cultivated through working on some of the most challenging development projects that the City of San Francisco and the greater Bay Area region have to offer. His areas of expertise include the most advanced transportation analysis techniques, CEQA practices and policies, and helping clients determine how changes in technology, demographics, and the macro economy should be incorporated into their transportation planning decisions so that the communities they represent remain vital and resilient. He is the leader of Fehr & Peers’ San Francisco office as well as frequent contributor to Fehr & Peers’ Land-Use Transportation Discipline Group; a group of specialists whom collaborate to advance the state of the transportation planning practice and develop new technical innovations. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE SFMTA TNC Studies (San Francisco, CA) Eric is currently assisting the SF Municipal Transportation Agency and the SF County Transportation Authority strategize on a series of studies to better understand the impact of TNC operations in San Francisco. These studies assess TNCs’ impacts on safety, congestion, transit Principal-in-Charge Eric Womeldorff, PE EDUCATION M.E. in Transportation Engineering, University of Florida, 2005 B.S. in Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 2003 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION Licensed in Engineering – State of California No. 81432 AFFILIATIONS San Francisco Planning and Urban Research: Member Institute of Transportation Engineers: Member EXPERTISE Emerging Mobility Trends / TNCs / AVs Project Management Integrated Land Use and Transportation Transportation Demand Management Travel Behavior Forecasting Transit Planning Multimodal Operations and Simulation 23Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan >Modeling Transit Engineering Infrastructure: Synchro Can Do That?, ITE Annual District 6 Conference, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona (Andy Kosinski, Eric Womeldorff, and Mike Hawkins) >Preventing Carmageddon in San Francisco’s Rapidly Densifying Core, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2013, Washington DC (Liz Brisson, Kyle Gebhart, Eric Womeldorff, and Elizabeth Sall) in a responsible and sustainable way. The effort included the identification and evaluation of short-, medium-, and long-term transportation programs and strategies in five distinct but complementary areas: Stanford commuters and TDM programs; Stanford’s campus shuttle system, The Marguerite; Biking to the Stanford campus; Stanford parking policies and management; and internal circulation on the Stanford campus. This effort began with a benchmarking effort of similar universities or service providers for each of the above areas, continued with intense rounds of brainstorming, evaluation, and screening with internal Stanford stakeholders, and concluded with the identification of programs and strategies Stanford may pursue. SELECT PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS >Autonomous Vehicles and Urbanism: What’s Next? 25th Congress for the New Urbanism, 2017, Seattle, Washington >TNC 101: The Future is Already Here Presentation to SF Municipal Transportation Agency and SF Planning Departments, Spring and Summer 2017 >Think Like a Futurist // Use Trendlab+ to Debate VMT Trends, California Chapter, American Planning Association Annual Meeting, 2015, Oakland, California (Ron Milam and Eric Womeldorff) This data-driven, quantitative approach will allow UCSF to focus their resources in an astute and maximally effective way. Eric is also advising UCSF on their partnership with UC Hastings to develop student and employee housing at UC Hastings’ Civic Center campus as well as advising and helping UCSF gain entitlements for additional student housing and a new Psychiatric Center in the Dogpatch neighborhood of San Francisco. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital Transportation Consulting (San Francisco, CA) Through a multiyear process, Eric helped the SF Department of Public Health craft a TDM Plan and Monitoring Agreement that would meet the tough requirements of the SFMTA TDM Office. Once implemented, the Plan will catapult ZSFG into a group of peer leading edge medical Institutions with leading edge TDM leading practices to match. It defines methodologies for tracking TDM usage and effectiveness and allows for pivots along the five year implementation plan, if needed. The TDM Plan and Monitoring Agreement and has been blessed by the SFMTA Board and praised by the SF Board of Supervisors. Stanford University Sustainable Transportation Strategy Development (Stanford, CA) Along with Arup, Eric helped to develop a strategic transportation vision for Stanford University. Essentially, Stanford is trying to determine which TDM and parking strategies, multimodal enhancements, transit improvements, etc. can best be coupled with Stanford’s mission to aid it in growing 24 Genentech Master Plan Update (South San Francisco, CA) As deputy project manager, Daniel led an update to Genentech’s ten year development strategy for its main campus in South San Francisco. Transportation demand management (TDM) represented a focal point of the Master Plan: Genentech set a goal of 35 percent of peak period trips via TDM modes. To achieve this goal in a suburban office park setting, the Master Plan and EIR identifies a range of TDM strategies, services, and improvements to maintain strong use of transit, carpooling, and active transportation amid a growing campus. Stanford University Transportation Strategy (Stanford, CA) As task lead, Daniel supported the development of a strategic transportation vision for Stanford University. The study sought to identify and analyze the effectiveness of potential TDM, parking, active transportation, transit, and vehicle improvements to enable the University’s next stage of growth. The study considered short-, medium-, and long- term transportation programs and projects. The project included extensive coordination with internal stakeholders and benchmarking with peer instructions and TDM programs. ABOUT Daniel is a senior transportation planner focusing on transit, station access, land use, and complete streets projects. His experience spans the spectrum of project development, from feasibility studies and alternative analyses to conceptual design and program management. Daniel brings a passionate, problem-solving approach to transportation projects in order to achieve meaningful, implementable outcomes. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE SamTrans Express Bus Feasibility Study (San Francisco Peninsula, CA) As project manager, Daniel led a feasibility study to reintroduce express bus service along the US- 101 corridor on the Peninsula. SamTrans ceased operations of express buses in 2010 amid declining ridership associated with the Great Recession and competition from BART and Caltrain. The agency is considering reintroduction of express services in coordination with the US-101 Managed Lanes project. Daniel identified opportunity travel markets underserved by regional transit and tech shuttles by analyzing Streetlight GPS data, the CCAG model, and previous express bus ridership patterns. Based on this analysis, Daniel led the development of route concepts and ridership forecasts. Project Manager Daniel Jacobson EDUCATION B.A., with Honors, Urban Studies Stanford University EXPERTISE Transit Planning Complete Streets Planning/Design Station Access Planning Campus Master Planning Transportation Impact Analysis RECENT AWARDS APA Northern Section 2017 Hard Fought Victories Award, Willits Main Street Enhancement Plan 25Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan a section of US-101 undergoing relinquishment by Caltrans as a result of the Willits Bypass Project. It focused on addressing key corridor issues such as traffic calming, bicycle and pedestrian safety, transit operations, local business access, and streetscape beautification. Daniel concurrently led a circulation study for the Downtown streets network to evaluate complementary complete streets improvements. Millbrae Station Access Plan (Millbrae, CA) Daniel developed a multimodal station access plan for Millbrae Station as a part of the City’s Station Area Specific Plan. The plan evaluated access and circulation for the proposed transit-oriented development project surrounding the station. Key considerations included bus and shuttle accommodations, kiss-and-ride circulation, and bicycle and pedestrian connectivity. The plan was conducted on behalf of BART, in coordination with the City of Millbrae, Caltrain, and SamTrans. Washington District Transportation Management Plan (West Sacramento, CA) As task lead, Daniel developed complete streets guidelines to support multimodal circulation and transit-oriented development in West Sacramento’s Washington District. The guidelines included concepts for a layered transportation network and improvements to transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicle networks. as an on-demand service enabled by both phone- and app-based booking. The SRTP culminated in a procurement process for a new on-demand transit software platform to improve the efficiency and responsiveness of booking, dispatch, and routing bus services. Station Planning for Caltrain Modernization (SF Peninsula, CA) As deputy project manager, Daniel led a review of station access priorities for a redesigned Hillsdale Station as a part of the Caltrain Modernization project. Daniel evaluated existing and future needs for buses, shuttles, kiss-and-ride, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Daniel worked closely with Caltrain staff to analyze strategies to accommodate passengers during construction of the new station and associated grade separations. Stockton Bicycle Master Plan (Stockton, CA) As task lead, Daniel led a citywide assessment of opportunities and constraints for the City of Stockton’s Bicycle Master Plan. Daniel managed a comprehensive Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis and bicycle safety assessment to identify existing challenges in the City’s network and potential improvements. Daniel worked closely with the Local Government Commission (LGC) in community outreach efforts. Willits Main Street Corridor and Downtown Circulation Studies (Willits, CA) Daniel co-led an award-winning community-driven complete streets design process for the Main Street corridor in Willits. The project redesigned California High Speed Rail Station Planning and EIR/EIS Transportation Section (San Francisco-San Jose and San Jose-Merced Subsections, CA) As deputy project manager, Daniel led the development of the Transportation Section of the EIR/EIS for the California High Speed Rail San Francisco-San Jose and San Jose-Merced subsections. Daniel supported the development of station concept plans and mode of access projections for four HSR stations, including San Francisco, Millbrae, San Jose, and Gilroy. Daniel analyzed station access facility needs, including demand for passenger loading, parking, bus facilities, bicycle parking, and bicycle and pedestrian access. Daniel participated in several station planning charrettes and provided recommendations for initial station design and circulation concepts. Upon completion of the station planning process, Daniel led a team of 30 staff to undertake the transportation analysis for the EIR/EIS. Rossmoor Short Range Transportation Plan (Walnut Creek, CA, 2017) As project manager, Daniel led a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for the Rossmoor senior living community in Walnut Creek. As one of the largest senior communities in California, Rossmoor operates fixed route, dial-a-bus, and paratransit services. The SRTP evaluated opportunities to increase residents’ mobility as well as service productivity. Community engagement represented a key focus of the SRTP process, including surveys distributed on-board, online, and in the local newspaper, as well as outreach at community events. Daniel led an innovative analysis to redesign the bus network 26 engaged thousands of City residents through both online and in-person engagement tools. Monterey Citywide Transportation and Parking Study (Monterey, CA) Matt managed a diverse project that developed a comprehensive circulation analysis and plan for the City of Monterey. The analysis required multi-modal transportation planning to consider opportunities to enhance bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access, as well as an efficient and effective parking program. Fehr & Peers led a three-day community charrette as part of the project to collaborate with City staff, major stakeholders, and community members on effective transportation and parking solutions. San José Diridon Station Area Plan (San José, CA) Matt managed this project for Fehr & Peers, which developed access and circulation plan options, as well as a preferred multimodal access, circulation and connectivity plan for the Diridon Station Area Plan in San José. Our work included development of concepts for the proposed transportation network and recommendations to minimize conflicts between travel modes and maximize circulation efficiency. Samtrans/Caltrain Transportation Planning On-Call (San Mateo County, CA) Matt managed the Fehr & Peers team for this multi- year on call planning contract, which includes ABOUT Matt has over 15 years of experience and is an expert in sustainable transportation and mobility strategies. He has an extensive background in transit planning, integrated transportation and land use studies, bicycle and pedestrian planning, multimodal corridor studies, and in non-motorized travel demand forecasting. He has served as project manager on numerous multimodal transportation studies and recently managed Fehr & Peers’ role on the Caltrain Electrification EIR. Matt also directs the firm’s FP Think initiative which focuses on disruptive changes affecting the transportation and mobility sector. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Redwood City Moves, Citywide Transportation Plan (Redwood City, CA) Matt is managing a multidisciplinary team of planners, urban designers, and engineers for this project, which is developing a transportation plan that supports an improved quality of life, health, and sustainability for the City’s residents. To accomplish this goal, Fehr & Peers devoted significant time to understanding the travel patterns within and through Redwood City. This process laid the groundwork for the City to identify and address the most pressing challenges now and into the future. Fehr & Peers also managed comprehensive outreach efforts, which ultimately Technical Advisor Matt Haynes, PE, AICP EDUCATION M.S. in Transportation Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2001 M.C.P. in City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, 2001 B.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering (with honors), University of California, Davis, 1999 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION Professional Engineer, CA AICP AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association / AICP Licensed Civil Engineer in CA Congress for the New Urbanism SPUR San Jose Policy Board 27Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan prototypes for effective, efficient circulation amongst campus subareas. Genentech Transit Hub and Bus Stop Design Studies (South San Francisco, CA) As part of implementation of the Genentech Master Plan, Matt managed several studies to develop detailed designs to evaluate transit center alternatives, provide high-quality bus waiting areas and improve shuttle route efficiency on Genentech’s South San Francisco campus. Ventura Carbon Reduction Tool (Ventura, CA) Matt managed Fehr & Peers’ efforts on this project, which developed a tool to analyze various programs related to energy and greenhouse gas reduction. Strategies contained in the tool included transportation and land use strategies that would decrease vehicle miles travelled, including improved bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, parking management strategies and carsharing. San Francisco Pedestrian Master Plan and Pedestrian Volume Model (San Francisco, CA) Matt co-managed this project which included development of pedestrian travel forecasts, a detailed project prioritization methodology supported by a GIS-based pedestrian volume model, comprehensive collision analysis, and a summary of innovative technologies. which included performing a market analysis of express bus patrons and evaluating opportunities to better capture target rider groups. This analysis was used to help identify potential service changes and partnership opportunities between VTA and local shuttle providers. Google Transportation Master Planning (Mountain View, CA) Matt has served as Project Manager and Principal in Charge of several transportation projects and tasks related to Google’s campus master planning efforts over the last five years. This has included extensive work analyzing transportation patterns and improvement needs for all travel modes, including bicycling, walking, gBus and automobile access. Genentech Campus Master Plan (South San Francisco, CA) Matt managed the transportation element to the Genentech Campus Master Plan, which was designed to provide a 10-year development strategy for Genentech’s main campus in South San Francisco. At buildout, the campus will include over 6 million square feet of development and accommodate over 15,000 employees. Facebook Master Planning Studies (Menlo Park, CA) Matt has been overseeing several aspects of Fehr & Peers’ ongoing transportation master planning work for Facebook, including developing transportation circulation and access concepts for several new campus buildings, evaluating employee connectivity options and developing internal circulation consulting support services for various transit projects in San Mateo, Santa Clara and San Francisco Counties. Key projects have included the Caltrain Ticket Vending Machine Replacement Study, Caltrain Strategic Plan Update, and HSR Blended Service Operational Analysis. Caltrain Electrification Project EIS/EIR Matt managed theFehr & Peers used several innovative approaches to analyze the effects of the Electrification Project on station access, at-grade rail crossings and on local and regional traffic patterns. This included developing a customized mode-of- access Direct Ridership Model (DRM) to evaluate changes in ridership by access mode and developing a detailed microsimulation model to study the effects of increased train frequencies at rail crossings. Envision 2040 General Plan Update (San José, CA) Matt served as project manager this project, which includes the transportation analysis and circulation policy development for the Envision San José 2040 General Plan update. Major elements of the project have included development of a citywide network of street typologies and innovative travel demand model enhancements including the addition of smart growth sensitivity, greenhouse gas emission outputs and direct transit ridership forecasting. A key goal of the General Plan is to promote San José as a walking and bicycling-first City. VTA Express Bus Business Plan (Santa Clara County, CA) Matt managed Fehr & Peers’ role on this study, 28 SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Expert Panels/Committees Participated in expert panels related to travel demand forecasting, traffic simulation, and smart growth planning. >White House Area Transportation Study, FHWA – Member of Transportation Working Group (2006-2007) >Assessment of Local Models and Tools for Analyzing Smart Growth – Caltrans – Member of Technical Advisory Committee, 2007 >California RTP Guidelines Update for Compliance with Green House Gas Analysis Requirements of AB32 – Caltrans – Member of Regional Transportation Plan Modeling Sub- Work Group (2007-2008) >California RTP Guidelines Update for Compliance with SB 375 – California Transportation Commission - Member of Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines subcommittee and Modeling subcommittee (2009-2010) >SACOG DaySim-TRANSIMS Peer Review – FHWA – (2009) ABOUT Ron is a Principal with Fehr & Peers located in the Roseville, California office. He is actively involved in a wide variety of project work but also finds time to co-lead the firm’s research and development efforts and teach transportation and land use planning courses for UC Davis. Ron has an extensive background in GHG and VMT analysis, big data analysis, travel demand model development and applications, traffic operations analysis, micro- simulation modeling, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and CEQA. He has also published papers on a wide variety of transportation planning and traffic engineering topics and received recognition for his work that includes the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) National Past President’s Award and best paper honors at the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Conference on Planning Applications. His recent work has included developing recommended practices on VMT modeling and analysis for the FHWA Handbook for Estimating Transportation Greenhouse Gases for Integration into the Planning Process and a VMT White Paper for the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research related to SB 743 implementation. Technical Advisor Ron Milam, AICP, PTP EDUCATION B.S. (with Highest Honors), Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning (Emphasis on Land Use and Transportation Planning), University of California at Davis, 1990 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION American Institute of Certified Planners (011595) Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc., Professional Transportation Planner (52) AFFILIATIONS Transportation Research Board (TRB) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) American Planning Association (APA) RECENT AWARDS APA Sacramento Valley Section 2012 Innovation in Green Community Planning for the City of Sacramento Climate Action Plan (Fehr & Peers – subconsultant) APA Sacramento Valley Section 2012 Focused Issue Planning Award for the Sacramento River Crossing Alternatives Study (Fehr & Peers – prime consultant) 29Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan >US 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange VMT Analysis, Rancho Cordova, CA, 2010 >I-80/SR 65 Interchange and Freeway Corridor Study VMT Analysis, Placer County, CA, 2014 Big Data for Transportation Analysis Project director, project manager, or technical specialist developing and applying models built from cell phone and GPS OD data, crowd-sourced GPS speed data, license plate surveys, transit surveys, household surveys, and social media API feeds. >San Joaquin Valley Model Improvement Program >AMBAG OD Study >Napa County OD Study >Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Complex Transportation Impact Study >SANDAG SR 125 Toll Road Before/After OD Study >City of Citrus Heights General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan, 2011 >Sacramento County General Plan VMT Analysis, 2010 >Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) Greenhouse Gas Inventory Analysis, 2010 >Yolo County General Plan and Climate Action Plan, 2010 >City of Woodland General Plan, 2014 >City of Santa Rosa GHG Reduction Strategy, 2011 >City of Roseville Sustainability Plan, 2010 >Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) Regional Plan and Regional Transportation Plan VMT Analysis, 2010 >Sonoma Mountain Village VMT Analysis, 2009 >Newhall Mission Village Draft EIR VMT Analysis, Los Angeles County, 2010 >Newhall Entrada Village Draft EIR VMT Analysis, Los Angeles County, 2010 >Centennial VMT Analysis, Los Angeles County, 2011 >El Rancho San Benito Draft EA VMT Analysis, San Benito County, 2009 >I-80/Eureka Road Interchange VMT and Fuel Consumption Analysis, Roseville, CA 2010 >TRB ADB45 Committee – Travel Forecasting Resource (2010-2013) >Innovative Urban Mobility Services Meeting – National Academy of Sciences/TRB (2014) >OPR SB 743 Modeling Convenings for SB 743 (2015) VMT and GHG Analysis Project director, project manager, or technical specialist preparing VMT and GHG analysis for general plans, climate action plans, greenhouse gas reduction plans, and transportation analysis guidelines. >FHWA Handbook for Estimating Transportation Greenhouse Gases for Integration into the Planning Process >VMT White Paper for the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research related to SB 743 implementation >California RTP Guidelines Update for Compliance with SB 375 – California Transportation Commission, 2010 >State of Washington Greenhouse Gas Analysis Tools Evaluation, WA, 2010 >City of Sacramento Climate Action Plan, 2011 >City of Sacramento General Plan, 2014 >City of Los Angeles Westside Plan, 2012 >City of Pasadena General Plan, 2014 30 as part of the Brentwood Surface Lot and the surrounding local serving retail. Fehr & Peers will provide three parking layout conceptual designs that provide better pedestrian and vehicle circulation. Additionally, Fehr & Peers will provide a series of potential streetscape improvements for the surrounding blocks in order to improve circulation between pedestrians, bicyclists, loading, and vehicles. Oyster Point Specific Plan (South San Francisco, CA) Oyster Point Development has retained Fehr & Peers to evaluate internal intersection operations related to the Oyster Point Specific Plan Update. The Oyster Point Specific Plan was approved in 2011 and included over 2 million square feet of office and research and development space. Since then, the Oyster Point Development has been revised to include a mix of land uses including office, research and development, and retail space. Fehr & Peers was retained to complete transportation analysis to inform the roadway network design and understand how the proposed project would impact existing conditions. As project manager, Sarah led efforts to analyze internal intersections using a micro- simulation model to address how the proposed project will operate internally and impact the existing congested Oyster Point Boulevard corridor. Sarah has used the traffic modeling software, to identify ABOUT Sarah is a transportation engineer in the San Francisco office of Fehr & Peers. She joined Fehr & Peers in 2010 after completing her degree in Civil Engineering with a specialization in Transportation. Her expertise consists of project management, transportation operations, transit operations, and traffic engineering. Sarah, who was born and raised in South San Francisco, is grateful for the opportunity to continue to work with the community she grew up in as a project manager for the South San Francisco Traffic Engineering On-Call and several other projects in the City and surrounding area. Her experience at Fehr & Peers includes project management, transportation operations analysis, transit planning, transportation engineering, transportation impact analysis, travel demand forecasting, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancement plans. Sarah’s experience in a diverse set of roles and projects has allowed her to bring a multimodal approach to each project. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Brentwood Circulation Study (South San Francisco, CA) Sarah is the project manager for the Brentwood Circulation Study. As part of the traffic engineering on-call, the City of South San Francisco is addressing pedestrian, vehicle, and parking circulation issues Senior Transportation Engineer Sarah Nadiranto Chan, PE, TE EDUCATION B.S. in Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2010 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, State of California (#83414) Licensed Professional Traffic Engineer, State of California (#2808) EXPERTISE Transportation Impact Analysis Traffic Engineering Parking Design Transportation Conceptual Design Freeway Operations Analysis Transit Operations Analysis Project Management 31Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan uses a corridor-specific traffic assignment model to translate demand forecasts into constrained forecasts, followed by a traffic micro-simulation model that allows us to accurately evaluate the detailed nuances of Express Lane design options. The final work product for Fehr & Peers will be a detailed Traffic Operations Analysis Report covering the HOV-to-Express-Lane conversions, consistent with the Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive on managed lanes. Bayhill Specific Plan (San Bruno, CA) The Bayhill Specific Plan, located in the City of San Bruno, is the home to the largest office park in the city and includes offices for YouTube, Walmart, as well as commercial space in the Bayhill Shopping Center. The purpose of the project is to develop a vision for the Bayhill area that invests in its existing and future residents and employers. The project’s proximity to the San Bruno BART and Caltrain Station, as well as regional facilities including US- 101, I-280, and I-380, make the Bayhill project site unique with respect to the variety of travel options. As the transportation lead, Fehr & Peers will assist the project team in evaluating key internal and external intersections and roadway segments to understand how the project may impact the existing infrastructure. Fehr & Peers will also document potential transportation opportunities to provide a more cohesive multi-modal network that is inviting for all users. 680 North Express Lane Project (Contra Costa County, CA) The Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCTA), in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to convert the existing High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane on southbound Interstate 680 (I-680) into express lanes. The existing HOV lanes in the southbound direction of I-680 would be converted from just south of Marina Vista Avenue in Martinez to just south of Treat Boulevard in Walnut Creek and the northbound I-680 HOV lane would be converted from I-680/State Route (SR) 242 Interchange to approximately Marina Vista Avenue. Separate from this project, CCTA is completing preliminary engineering from Treat Boulevard to Rudgear Road (EA 3A5800). As part of this project, the agencies plan to convert a proposed HOV lane extension into an express lane as well. Collectively, these I-680 express lane conversions constitute the Project. As we have experienced on other projects, traditional traffic operations analysis tools (such as FREQ or HCS) are often not sensitive enough to the special characteristics of Express Lanes to adequately analyze the complicated weaving behaviors associated with access points and the interrelated effects of toll lane operation and adjacent mixed- flow lanes, particularly on facilities that experience moderate levels of congestion. Our technical approach to the 680 North Express Lanes project roadway improvements such as creating a corridor that’s inviting for all users and has since worked with the project team to prepare conceptual drawings of potential improvements that benefit multiple users and achieve the circulation goals of the project. Candlestick Point / Hunters Point Design (San Francisco, CA) Sarah is the deputy project manager for the Transportation Study for the redevelopment of Candlestick Point and the Hunters Point Shipyard, a former Navy base. This project would add over 10,000 new housing units, 885,000 square feet of retail space, and over 2.5 million square feet of office/research and development space – a development on the scale of entire neighborhoods of San Francisco. Fehr & Peers is involved in developing the internal circulation network for the site designed to encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use and a robust package of transit service improvements, including new express buses to Downtown San Francisco and a new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route connecting the project site with regional transit hubs, such as Caltrain and BART. This highly- controversial and complex project and its EIR were approved and certified by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in June 2010 and won the American Planning Association Award for Hard-Fought Victory in early 2012. Currently, Sarah is serving as the Project Manager for traffic engineering design work related to the development of the Candlestick Point / Hunters Point Project. 32 Alameda Point TDM Plan Implementation (Alameda, CA) Teresa is the project manager for the implementation of the TDM plan for a new mixed-use, transit- oriented community in the City of Alameda. The project involves implementing the initial steps of the TDM plan over the first three years of the planning process. The project includes creating a funding mechanism for the plan, establishing a TMA, creating a monitoring and evaluation plan, and establishing initial programs and community website. Lincoln Centre Campus Redevelopment EIR (Foster City, CA) Teresa worked as a transportation planner to prepare key sections of the EIR for a 595,000 square foot bio-pharmaceutical campus in Foster City, in the San Francisco peninsula. She was responsible for preparing the traffic impact analysis, including intersection operations and the pedestrian, transit, and transportation demand management elements of the report. Inner Harbor Specific Plan EIR (Redwood City, CA) Teresa worked as the transportation analyst to help prepare the traffic impact analysis for a large specific plan east of US-101 in Redwood City. In addition ABOUT Teresa is a transportation planner who is passionate about data-driven analysis of where, when, and how we travel. Her approach to problem-solving involves identifying unique and elegant methods of applying available information to find the right transportation solution for the context and issue at hand. Her areas of expertise include transportation demand management, transportation policy analysis, and interactions between land use development and travel behavior. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE San Francisco Transportation Sustainability Program (San Francisco, CA) Teresa provided analysis and recommendations in support of a new Transportation Demand Management Ordinance in the City of San Francisco. She assisted with the collection of travel behavior data at dozens of sites within San Francisco for use in a data-driven analysis of how varying TDM measures and land use contexts affect behavior. This research was directly used in setting the policy direction and final structure of the TDM Ordinance adopted in early 2017. Transportation Planner Teresa Whinery, AICP EDUCATION Masters in Urban and Regional Planning, University of California Los Angeles, 2014 B.A., Public Policy, Stanford University, 2008 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION AICP AFFILIATIONS Women’s Transportation Seminar (WTS) American Planning Association (APA) American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) EXPERTISE Transportation Demand Management Transportation Policy and Planning Parking Demand and Pricing Travel Demand Forecasting Transportation Impact Analysis 33Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan SELECT PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS >Safe Travels: An Assessment of the Current Context, Barriers, and Opportunities Facing Safe Routes to School Programs in Los Angeles County (Report), 2014, UCLA Urban Planning Master’s Program Applied Research Project Teresa was responsible for writing and summarizing several years of analytical work, culminating in the creation of a detailed phased implementation and financing strategy for $195 million of transportation projects over a 25 year period. AltSchool Transportation Demand Management Plan (San Francisco, CA) Teresa prepared an analysis of traffic management and transportation demand management policies and strategies for AltSchool, a collection of small private schools operating in urban environments. Responding to their unique urban location, typical travel patterns, and the needs of school-age children and their parents, Teresa developed both a list of potential strategies and recommendations for AltSchool management, as well as a Congestion Management Plan template for use in submittals for new school sites. 1515 South Van Ness Transportation Impact Study (San Francisco, CA) Teresa worked as a transportation planner to perform vehicle volume forecasts and transportation impact analysis for a residential development in San Francisco’s Mission neighborhood. Teresa used model runs from the City’s travel demand model, SF-CHAMP, to generate intersection level turning movements and vehicle forecasts for the study area. Teresa also prepared trip generation for the site, and analyzed the effect of project trips on vehicle traffic, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and transit facilities within the study area. to providing technical analysis concerning traffic operations using microsimulation, she prepared an initial assessment of potential TDM measures and programs to help reduce the impact of resulting vehicular traffic on surrounding communities. Mission Rock EIR (San Francisco, CA) Teresa worked as a transportation planner to prepare analysis for the TIS and EIR for a large mixed-use development in the Mission Bay neighborhood of San Francisco. Work included development of future year traffic volume forecasts, queuing analysis, and assessment of the project’s proposed parking management plan. Golden State Warriors Arena EIR (San Francisco, CA) Teresa worked as a transportation planner to perform transportation impact analysis for use in the Golden State Warriors Arena EIR, a controversial project in San Francisco’s Mission Bay neighborhood. This project included analysis of the effects of project traffic on local intersections, including analysis of vehicle delay and queuing at intersections in four separate time periods and under two scenarios. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Long Term Transportation Plan (San Francisco, CA) Teresa worked as the project planner to finalize the GGNRA Long Term Transportation Plan. This comprehensive plan includes financial and technical details for a wide variety of capital improvement projects as well as programmatic interventions. 34 SamTrans Express Bus Feasibility Study (San Mateo County, CA) Fehr & Peers is helping SamTrans explore the potential for several express bus routes between San Mateo County communities and job centers in San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties. As project planner, Drew analyzed a large StreetLight dataset and synthesized that data source with regional travel model outputs and the 2012 California Household Travel Survey to ensure that a critical travel market analysis was unbiased and accurate. Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines Update (San Francisco, CA) Fehr & Peers is leading an update to the San Francisco Planning Department’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, refreshing 25-year-old data and rethinking the analytical workflow. Drew managed extensive data collection and combined new person-trip counts and intercept surveys with Census Bureau, California Household Travel Survey, and other existing datasets. SELECT PUBLICATIONS >Incorporating Equity and Resiliency in Municipal Transportation Planning: Case Study of Mobility Hubs in Oakland, California (Transportation Research Record, 2016) ABOUT Drew is adept at delivering insights that shape effective and equitable transportation decision. He has a strong background in Big Data analysis and has developed expertise in cross-referencing and integrating multiple data sources to ensure accurate results. His skill areas include transportation impact analysis, transit market analysis, and city transportation policy development. While completing his Master of City Planning degree at UC Berkeley, Drew focused on how interactive data visualizations can improve communication between transportation planners and members of the public. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Smart and Equitable Mobility Hubs Study (Oakland, CA) Drew was the planner for an innovative project with the City of Oakland. The client is interested in deploying the concept of “mobility hubs,” or places where multiple transportation modes meet, to deliver flexible, cost-effective transportation options to the historically underserved citizens of East Oakland. Drew and the Fehr & Peers team developed a sophisticated web map/tool that enabled City of Oakland staff to identify promising mobility hub sites by quickly cross-referencing equity-focused sociodemographic data from the Census Bureau, local transportation infrastructure data, and parcel-level land use data. Transportation Planner Drew Levitt EDUCATION Master of City Planning, Transportation Planning and Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 2016 B.A., Music, Yale University, 2008 AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association San Francisco Planning + Urban Research Association Young Professionals in Transportation 35Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan to accurately forecast internalized trips. Mike also guided the project through EIR certification and approval stages. Foster City Pedestrian and Bicycle Assessment (Foster City, CA) Mike served as the project manager for this comprehensive study in Foster City. Fehr & Peers developed Safe Routes to School recommendations for four local schools and provided a citywide bicycle network assessment, including level of traffic stress analysis. Fehr & Peers also provided peer review support for a traffic signal network assessment and several bicycle infrastructure plans. Mike was responsible for overseeing all technical work and coordinating walking audits at the four Foster City schools. Millbrae Station Area Specific Plan (Millbrae, CA) Mike served as the deputy project manager and lead transportation engineer for Fehr & Peers on the Millbrae Station Area Specific Plan Project. We provided multimodal transportation engineering and planning services for the Millbrae Intermodal Station and the surrounding Specific Plan Area. Mike coordinated with several regional transportation agencies, local jurisdictions, as well as private developers to develop a Station Area Specific Plan and Station Access Plan that accommodates all ABOUT Mike is a transportation engineer/planner with over five years of experience in the field. Mike has served as project manager on a wide variety of transportation-related projects, from large-scale transportation impact studies that require the most advanced, state-of-the-practice analysis techniques, to transportation demand management studies that focus on creative ways to reduce vehicle miles traveled. Mike has also been the technical leader on many challenging, high-profile projects throughout San Francisco, Napa, and San Mateo Counties. This diverse transportation experience allows him to bring a multi-disciplined and technical approach to transportation projects of all sizes and settings. Mike is well versed in many technical software packages that can help to visualize the most complex transportation problems. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE South San Francisco Station Area Specific Plan (South San Francisco, CA) Mike managed the transportation analysis of the South San Francisco Station Area Specific Plan. The Plan promoted alternative modes of access to improve connectivity between proposed new Caltrain station and downtown South San Francisco. Mike applied complex state-of-the-practice mixed- use trip generation and distribution methodologies Transportation Engineer/Planner Mike Hawkins, PE EDUCATION B.S. in Civil Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, 2011 REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION Licensed, Civil Engineering, California, No. 83513 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Associate, 2012; No. 10723837 AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) San Francisco Planning and Urban Research (SPUR) Order of the Engineer EXPERTISE Transportation Demand Management Transportation Impact Analysis Traffic Operations and Multi-Modal Simulation Multimodal Planning Transportation Design Mixed-Use (MXD) Trip Generation 36 SELECT PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS >Using the Versatility of VISSIM to Model the Versatility of Roundabouts, TRB International Conference on Roundabouts, 2014, Seattle, Washington >Modeling Transit Engineering Infrastructure: Synchro Can Do That?, ITE Annual District 6 Conference, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona (Andy Kosinski, Eric Womeldorff, and Mike Hawkins) data collection, validating, and finally the preparation and distribution of the Triennial TDM Monitoring Report. Inner Harbor Specific Plan Circulation Element and EIR (Redwood City, CA) As the technical lead for Fehr & Peers for the Inner Harbor Specific Plan circulation element and the transportation and circulation section of the Draft EIR, Mike oversaw technical analysis associated with the Inner Harbor Specific Plan and Harbor View Projects in Redwood City on the intersection, freeway, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit systems. The analysis included development of a complex Synchro/SimTraffic traffic simulation model and Fehr & Peers’ mixed-use trip generation “MXD” tool. Mike also led the effort in responding to public comments on the transportation section of the DEIR. Golden State Warriors Arena Transportation Management Plan (San Francisco, CA) Mike served as lead planner for this highly controversial projects in the San Francisco Mission Bay neighborhood. Fehr & Peers coordinated with many public and private stakeholders to create a TMP that met the needs of the project sponsor while integrating into the neighborhood. The project used other urban sports arenas and special event centers to craft a unique TMP that functions under a wide range of conditions. A key focus of the TMP was to encourage alternative transportation such as pedestrian, bicycle, transit, TNC vehicles, and shuttle access to the site to reduce single occupancy vehicles and VMT at the site. users. The project focused on safe, convenient, and reliable alternative transportation (transit, pedestrian, and bicycle) access in the Plan Area, including accommodating bicycle and pedestrian access across the El Camino Real barrier. Analysis included complex transit ridership forecasts and mixed-use trip generation. Foster City General Plan Update (Foster City, CA) Mike served as the lead transportation engineer for Foster City’s update to the General Plan Circulation Element. Mike’s role involved analyzing the operation of the existing transportation system and determining the required improvements to accommodate demand from future planned land uses. The update also included a review of existing goals, policies, and implementation measures to ensure that they strongly support all travel modes to minimize vehicle trip making and enhance livability. Foster City was interested in including a quantitative analysis of pedestrian and bicycle circulation in the General Plan EIR, including a Level of Service analysis for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit conditions, typically referred to Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS). Britannia Oyster Point TDM monitoring (South San Francisco, CA) Fehr & Peers prepared Triennial TDM reports on an on-going basis. These reports were intended to document the effectiveness of tenants’ final TDM Plans in achieving their required alternative mode use percentage. Mike assisted with the surveying, 37Proposal for the East of 101 Transportation Plan 38 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-175 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:4a. Resolution approving a consulting services agreement with Fehr &Peers of San Francisco,California for the East of 101 Transportation Plan in an amount not to exceed $150,000,authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, and authorizing a budget of $150,000. WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco (City)has identified the need to conduct a thorough analysis of existing traffic congestion within the East of 101 employment campus; and WHEREAS,the City is seeking ways to better manage growth in the industrial and research development parks in the East of 101 area to ensure a high-quality employment environment; and WHEREAS,the development and implementation of the East of 101 Transportation Plan (“Project”)aims to explore a range of transportation improvements in order to address current congestion,and accommodate continued growth and development; and WHEREAS,the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP)for Professional Services on November 29,2017, received four qualified proposals, and interviewed all proposing consultants on January 25, 2018; and WHEREAS,based on the interviews and the qualifications submitted,Fehr &Peers demonstrated they have the staffing availability and expertise to provide the transportation planning services that will guide the City’s infrastructure and policy development within the East of 101 area. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves a consulting services agreement,attached hereto as Exhibit A,with Fehr &Peers of San Francisco,California in an amount not to exceed $150,000,conditioned on the timely execution of the consulting services agreement and submission of all required documents,including but not limited to, certificates of insurance and endorsements, in accordance with the Project documents. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the Finance Department to establish the Project budget consistent with the information contained in the staff report. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the agreement and any other related documents on behalf of the City upon timely submission by Fehr &Peers of signed contract and all other documents, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to take any other required actions City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-175 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:4a. consistent with the intent of this resolution, that do not materially increase the City’s obligations. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 1 of 16 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND FEHR & PEERS THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of South San Francisco (“City”) and Fehr & Peers (“Consultant”) (together sometimes referred to as the “Parties”) as of March 28, 2018 (the “Effective Date”). Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, at the time and place and in the manner specified therein. In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall end on December 31, 2018, the date of completion specified in Exhibit A, and Consultant shall complete the work described in Exhibit A prior to that date, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended, as provided for in Section 8. The time provided to Consultant to complete the services required by this Agreement shall not affect the City’s right to terminate the Agreement, as provided for in Section 8. 1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices its profession. Consultant shall exercise the care, skills, and diligence exercised by other professionals in similar circumstances and shall prepare all work products required by this Agreement to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Consultant's profession. 1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its reasonable discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such person or persons. 1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance provided in Sections 1.1 and 1.2 above and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder. Section 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant’s proposal, attached as Exhibit A, or Consultant’s compensation schedule attached as Exhibit B, regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 2 of 16 Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner specified herein. Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City to Consultant under this Agreement is based upon Consultant’s estimated costs of providing the services required hereunder, including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consultant. Consequently, the parties further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the costs of contributions to any pensions and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors may be eligible. City therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond compensation required under this Agreement. 2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices, not more often than once per month during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for services performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information:  Serial identifications of progress bills (i.e., Progress Bill No. 1 for the first invoice, etc.);  The beginning and ending dates of the billing period;  A task summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior billings, the total due this period, the balance available under the Agreement, and the percentage of completion;  At City’s option, for each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time entries or time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and each reimbursable expense;  The total number of hours of work performed under the Agreement by Consultant and each employee, agent, and subcontractor of Consultant performing services hereunder, as well as a separate notice when the total number of hours of work by Consultant and any individual employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant reaches or exceeds eight hundred (800) hours, which shall include an estimate of the time necessary to complete the work described in Exhibit A;  The amount and purpose of actual expenditures for which reimbursement is sought;  The Consultant’s signature. 2.2 Monthly Payment. City shall make monthly payments, based on invoices received, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shall have thirty (30) days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements above to pay Consultant. City shall have no obligation to pay invoices submitted ninety (90) days past the performance of work or incurrence of cost. 2.3 Final Payment. City shall pay the last ten percent (10%) of the total sum due pursuant to this Agreement within sixty (60) days after completion of the services and submittal to City of a final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 3 of 16 2.4 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pursuant to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement, unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly executed change order or amendment. 2.5 Hourly Fees. Fees for work performed by Consultant on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on the compensation schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. 2.6 Reimbursable Expenses. The following constitute reimbursable expenses authorized by this Agreement: project-related travel, meals, data collection and purchasing, communications, and reproduction. Reimbursable expenses shall not exceed $10,700. Expenses not listed above are not chargeable to City. Reimbursable expenses are included in the total amount of compensation provided under Section 2 of this Agreement that shall not be exceeded. 2.7 Payment of Taxes, Tax Withholding. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes. To be exempt from tax withholding, Consultant must provide City with a valid California Franchise Tax Board form 590 (“Form 590”), as may be amended and such Form 590 shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit D. Unless Consultant provides City with a valid Form 590 or other valid, written evidence of an exemption or waiver from withholding, City may withhold California taxes from payments to Consultant as required by law. Consultant shall obtain, and maintain on file for three (3) years after the termination of this Agreement, Form 590s (or other written evidence of exemptions or waivers) from all subcontractors. Consultant accepts sole responsibility for withholding taxes from any non-California resident subcontractor and shall submit written documentation of compliance with Consultant’s withholding duty to City upon request. 2.8 Payment upon Termination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8, the City shall compensate the Consultant for all outstanding costs and reimbursable expenses incurred for work satisfactorily completed as of the date of written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to that date. 2.9 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of authorization from the Contract Administrator. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 4 of 16 2.10 Prevailing Wage. Where applicable, the wages to be paid for a day’s work to all classes of laborers, workmen, or mechanics on the work contemplated by this Agreement, shall be not less than the prevailing rate for a day’s work in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the state where the work hereby contemplates to be performed as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to the Director’s authority under Labor Code Section 1770, et seq. Each laborer, worker or mechanic employed by Consultant or by any subcontractor shall receive the wages herein provided for. The Consultant shall pay two hundred dollars ($200), or whatever amount may be set by Labor Code Section 1775, as may be amended, per day penalty for each worker paid less than prevailing rate of per diem wages. The difference between the prevailing rate of per diem wages and the wage paid to each worker shall be paid by the Consultant to each worker. An error on the part of an awarding body does not relieve the Consultant from responsibility for payment of the prevailing rate of per diem wages and penalties pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770-1775. The City will not recognize any claim for additional compensation because of the payment by the Consultant for any wage rate in excess of prevailing wage rate set forth. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant. a. Posting of Schedule of Prevailing Wage Rates and Deductions. If the schedule of prevailing wage rates is not attached hereto pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, the Consultant shall post at appropriate conspicuous points at the site of the project a schedule showing all determined prevailing wage rates for the various classes of laborers and mechanics to be engaged in work on the project under this contract and all deductions, if any, required by law to be made from unpaid wages actually earned by the laborers and mechanics so engaged. b. Payroll Records. Each Consultant and subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by the Consultant in connection with the public work. Such records shall be certified and submitted weekly as required by Labor Code Section 1776. Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein. City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of the City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 5 of 16 Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the types and amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Consultant shall provide Certificates of Insurance, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, indicating that Consultant has obtained or currently maintains insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory, in all respects, to the City. Consultant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant’s bid. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until Consultant has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s). 4.1 Workers’ Compensation. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by Consultant. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident. In the alternative, Consultant may rely on a self-insurance program to meet those requirements, but only if the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the Contract Administrator (as defined in Section 10.9). The insurer, if insurance is provided, or the Consultant, if a program of self- insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement. 4.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. 4.2.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting there from, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non- owned automobiles. 4.2.2 Minimum scope of coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 6 of 16 CG 0001 or GL 0002 (most recent editions) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. Automobile coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 8 and 9. No endorsement shall be attached limiting the coverage. 4.2.3 Additional requirements. Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as a certified endorsement to the policy: a. The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claims-made basis. b. Any failure of Consultant to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. 4.3 Professional Liability Insurance. 4.3.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) covering the licensed professionals’ errors and omissions. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall not exceed ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS $150,000 per claim. 4.3.2 Claims-made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverage is written on a claims-made form: a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement. b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates. c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of this Agreement, Consultant must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work. The City shall have the right to exercise, at the Consultant’s sole cost and expense, any extended reporting provisions of the policy, if the Consultant cancels or does not renew the coverage. d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 7 of 16 4.4 All Policies Requirements. 4.4.1 Acceptability of insurers. All insurance required by this section is to be placed with insurers with a Bests’ rating of no less than A:VII. 4.4.2 Verification of coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with complete copies of all policies delivered to Consultant by the insurer, including complete copies of all endorsements attached to those policies. All copies of policies and certified endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. If the City does not receive the required insurance documents prior to the Consultant beginning work, it shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete copies of all required insurance policies at any time. 4.4.3 Notice of Reduction in or Cancellation of Coverage. A certified endorsement shall be attached to all insurance obtained pursuant to this Agreement stating that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. In the event that any coverage required by this section is reduced, limited, cancelled, or materially affected in any other manner, Consultant shall provide written notice to City at Consultant’s earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than ten (10) working days after Consultant is notified of the change in coverage. 4.4.4 Additional insured; primary insurance. City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant (except professional services); products and completed operations of Consultant, as applicable; premises owned, occupied, or used by Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by the Consultant in the course of providing services pursuant to this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. A certified endorsement must be attached to all policies stating that coverage is primary insurance with respect to the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage. 4.4.5 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall disclose to and obtain the approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. Further, if the Consultant’s insurance policy includes a self-insured retention that Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 8 of 16 must be paid by a named insured as a precondition of the insurer’s liability, or which has the effect of providing that payments of the self-insured retention by others, including additional insureds or insurers do not serve to satisfy the self- insured retention, such provisions must be modified by special endorsement so as to not apply to the additional insured coverage required by this agreement so as to not prevent any of the parties to this agreement from satisfying or paying the self- insured retention required to be paid as a precondition to the insurer’s liability. Additionally, the certificates of insurance must note whether the policy does or does not include any self-insured retention and also must disclose the deductible. During the period covered by this Agreement, only upon the prior express written authorization of Contract Administrator, Consultant may increase such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The Contract Administrator may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self-insured retention levels with a requirement that Consultant procure a bond, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them. 4.4.6 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 4.4.7 Wasting Policy. No insurance policy required by Section 4, except professional liability insurance, shall include a “wasting” policy limit. 4.4.8 Variation. The City may approve a variation in the foregoing insurance requirements, upon a determination that the coverage, scope, limits, and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available, or that the City’s interests are otherwise fully protected. 4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the following remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Consultant’s breach: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement; b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 9 of 16 c. Terminate this Agreement. Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the City, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 and Section 2782.8 of the California Civil Code. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Section 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. 6.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant’s services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subparagraph 1.3; however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 10 of 16 (“PERS”) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 6.2 Consultant No Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent or to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. Section 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. 7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement. 7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the work hereunder. 7.3 Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals, including from City, of what-so-ever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing, Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement valid Business Licenses from City. 7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required of Consultant thereby. Consultant shall include the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by the Contract Administrator or this Agreement. Section 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 11 of 16 8.1 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written notification to Consultant. Consultant may cancel this Agreement for cause upon 30 days’ written notice to City and shall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed to the date of notice of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City all materials described in Section 9.1. 8.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1.1. Any such extension shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred during the extension period. 8.3 Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the parties. 8.4 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 8.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8.6 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 8.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement; Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 12 of 16 8.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement; 8.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not finished by Consultant; or 8.6.4 Charge Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had completed the work. Section 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS. 9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and Consultant agree that, until final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports and other documents are confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both parties unless required by law. 9.2 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement. 9.3 Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that Section 9.2 of this Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit, and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), the Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement. 9.4 Records Submitted in Response to an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposals. All responses to a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) or invitation to bid issued by the City become the exclusive property of the City. At such time as the City selects a bid, all proposals received become a matter of public record, and shall be regarded as public Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 13 of 16 records, with the exception of those elements in each proposal that are defined by Consultant and plainly marked as “Confidential,” “Business Secret” or “Trade Secret.” The City shall not be liable or in any way responsible for the disclosure of any such proposal or portions thereof, if Consultant has not plainly marked it as a “Trade Secret” or “Business Secret,” or if disclosure is required under the Public Records Act. Although the California Public Records Act recognizes that certain confidential trade secret information may be protected from disclosure, the City may not be in a position to establish that the information that a prospective bidder submits is a trade secret. If a request is made for information marked “Trade Secret” or “Business Secret,” and the requester takes legal action seeking release of the materials it believes does not constitute trade secret information, by submitting a proposal, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents and employees, from any judgment, fines, penalties, and award of attorneys fees awarded against the City in favor of the party requesting the information, and any and all costs connected with that defense. This obligation to indemnify survives the City’s award of the contract. Consultant agrees that this indemnification survives as long as the trade secret information is in the City’s possession, which includes a minimum retention period for such documents. Section 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including arbitration or an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 10.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County San Mateo or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 10.3 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. 10.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement. 10.5 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 14 of 16 10.6 Use of Recycled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper. 10.7 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place Consultant in a “conflict of interest,” as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act, codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq. Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve (12) months, Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et.seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any sums paid to the Consultant. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, it may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of Government Code § 1090 and, if applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the State of California. 10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials. 10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner (“Contract Administrator”). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee. 10.10 Notices. All notices and other communications which are required or may be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given (i) when received if personally delivered; (ii) when received if transmitted by telecopy, if received during normal business hours on a business day (or if not, the next business day after delivery) provided that such facsimile is legible and that at the time such facsimile is sent the sending Party receives written confirmation of receipt; (iii) if sent for next day delivery to a domestic address by recognized overnight delivery service (e.g., Federal Express); and (iv) upon receipt, if sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. In each case notice shall be sent to the respective Parties as follows: Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 15 of 16 Consultant: Eric Wolmeldorff, PE Principal Fehr & Peers 332 Pine Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 City: City Clerk City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 10.11 Professional Seal. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator, the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professional responsible for the report/design preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled “Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility,” as in the following example. Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility. 10.12 Integration. This Agreement, including all Exhibits attached hereto, and incorporated herein, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral pertaining to the matters herein. 10.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and/or by facsimile or other electronic means, and when each Party has signed and delivered at least one such counterpart, each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and, when taken together with other signed counterpart, shall constitute one Agreement, which shall be binding upon and effective as to all Parties.. 10.14 Construction. The headings in this Agreement are for the purpose of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect any of the terms of this Agreement. The parties have had an equal opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement; therefore any construction as against the drafting party shall not apply to this Agreement. The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] February 16, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Fehr & Peers Page 16 of 16 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FEHR & PEERS ____________________________ ____________________________ City Manager Eric Wolmeldorff, PE Principal Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney 2729962.1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1: Project Management & Coordination Fehr & Peers will facilitate an in-person kickoff meeting with City staff to review the project schedule, scope of work, and data needs, as well as our approach to community and stakeholder engagement. We will facilitate biweekly project management calls over the course of the project with City staff. We assume up to five in-person project management meetings in addition to the outreach efforts discussed in Task 2. Fehr & Peers will prepare meeting agendas, notes, and action items. Over the course of the study, we will continue our coordination efforts with ongoing transportation and land use projects in the East of 101 area, including the City Traffic Model, Caltrain Station relocation, TDM monitoring program, Oyster Point and Genentech plans, and various street improvements. Deliverables: Facilitation of five in-person meetings and biweekly coordination calls Task 2: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Fehr & Peers will collaborate with the City to conduct community and stakeholder outreach. Outreach will occur in three phases: 1. Community Vision & Goals: In coordination with Task 3, we will convene a Stakeholder Advisory Group with major employers and landowners and administer an online survey and webmap to seek input on the plan’s vision and goals. 2. Concept Review: We will review current performance (Task 4) and potential improvement concepts (Task 5) with the Stakeholder Advisory Group as well as the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. We will seek input to confirm that these concepts align with the community vision and goals identified in Task 3. 3. Plan Review: Upon completion of a draft plan, we will participate in a third round of outreach to the Stakeholder Advisory Group, Planning Commission, and City Council to review the draft recommendation of the plan. Deliverables: Online survey and webmap results; participation in eight meetings (three Stakeholder Advisory Group meetings, one Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting, two Planning Commission meetings, and two City Council meetings) Task 3: Vision, Goals, and Performance Measures At the project kickoff meeting and initial stakeholder outreach meeting, Fehr & Peers will lead visioning workshops to identify goals and performance measures for the study. We will facilitate three key exercises during these workshops: 1. TrendLab+ City staff and stakeholders will forecast how changing trends may affect future travel patterns using our Trendlab+ tool. Trendlab+ allows staff to input expectations of economic growth, fuel prices, autonomous vehicles, TNCs, vehicle ownership rates, and other factors to explore how various issues (known and unknown) may influence travel in the future. This exercise will serve as a starting point for identifying goals and performance measures in the East of 101 area. 2. Values and Priorities Assessment City staff and stakeholders will participate in a values and priorities assessment to identify what type of environment they want to create, avoid, and preserve in the East of 101 area. Concurrently, Fehr & Peers will work with the City and stakeholders to distribute an online values survey that features a similar set of questions as well as an interactive webmap to identify improvements consistent with this vision. The values assessment will help inform the problem statement and clear, specific goals and performance measures such that proposed transportation strategies can be directly evaluated against what is important to the City and community. 3. Draft Problem Statement Brainstorming Session City staff and stakeholders will formulate a draft problem statement based on the discussion of values, priorities, and trends. Based on the results of the project kickoff meeting and initial stakeholder outreach efforts, Fehr & Peers will refine the problem statement and develop a set of goals and performance measures. We expect the performance measures will cover key metrics such as person throughput, mode share, VMT, and safety. We will submit a draft goals and performance measures chapter to the City for review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). Deliverables: Draft Goals and Performance Measures Chapter Task 4: Review and Analyze Existing & Future Transportation Systems Fehr & Peers will review existing and future transportation conditions to establish baseline performance measures for the East of 101 area. The establishment of existing and future baselines will inform the identification and evaluation of projects and programs in Task 5. Our extensive local knowledge of current conditions and future plans in the East of 101 area will help us synthesize this information and effectively communicate opportunities and challenges. We will review, analyze, and map current and future transportation system performance. This analysis will build upon the City’s previous plans, traffic model, and other available data sources. With the exception of purchasing additional Streetlight Location-Based Services data, we will not conduct additional data collection. We will analyze the following: Active Transportation Conditions • Current and planned bicycle network • Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress • Current sidewalk gaps and planned pedestrian improvements • Bicycle and pedestrian injury collisions data (past five years) Vehicle Conditions • Existing and future street volumes and capacities at the district’s four main gateways – Oyster Point Boulevard, Grand Avenue, Airport Boulevard, and Utah Avenue • Freight & goods movement routes • Vehicle injury collisions (past five years) Transit Conditions • Transit routes, stops, and stations • Transit frequency, ridership, and productivity Land Use Conditions • Projected future land use growth • Presence of TDM programs and performance (if information is available from the City) Travel Patterns • Mode Shares: Existing AM and PM peak period mode shares for employees (using transit ridership data, the City’s 2016 counts, and available survey information) • Origin-Destination Patterns: Existing origin and destination patterns for employees and projected future patterns for residents (using Streetlight location-based services data) • VMT: 2020 and 2040 daily VMT per capita for employees and potential residents (using the MTC Model) We will assess the implications of key regional transportation projects and transportation innovations on the East of 101 area. We will consider how the Caltrain electrification, the US-101 Managed Lanes, and California High Speed Rail projects, autonomous vehicles, TNCs, and private ferry services may affect travel patterns. Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Baseline Conditions chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). Deliverables: Draft Baseline Conditions Chapter Task 5: Identify and Evaluate Transportation Projects and Programs Fehr & Peers will work with City staff and stakeholders to identify projects and programs which address the problem statement and goals of the study. We will identify these projects and programs based on previous plans, our Task 4 analysis, and direction from City staff, the Stakeholder Advisory Group, and community feedback (Task 2). Based on preliminary analysis that we’ve conducted, we expect the City may consider possible projects and programs including: • Transportation demand management program enhancements, such as creation of an East of 101 Transportation Management Agency (TMA), stronger monitoring of the City’s TDM ordinance, and implementation of new strategies such as subsidies for Scoop, LimeBike/Spin, or shared Uber/Lyft rides • Transit improvements, such as the expansion of Caltrain, ferry, shuttle, and SamTrans services as well as changes to Caltrain, ferry, and bus facilities • Street circulation and active transportation upgrades, such as the Produce/Utah Avenue interchange, Railroad Avenue extension, intelligent transportation systems (ITS), low stress bikeways, and other improvements identified in recent plans • Land use scenarios, such as mixed-use office or housing developments Fehr & Peers will evaluate these projects and programs using performance measures identified in Task 3. We will evaluate up to 15 projects and programs with up to eight performance measures. We will quantify potential costs, person throughput, mode shifts, and VMT reductions for each strategy under a near-term and long-term horizon year, incorporating our understanding of local travel models and the latest research from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. We will qualitatively assess possible risks and multimodal tradeoffs for each project or program. The resulting list of prioritized projects will inform the Implementation Plan (Task 6). We will summarize the results in a draft Transportation Strategies Evaluation chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). Deliverables: Draft Transportation Strategies Evaluation Chapter Task 6: Implementation Plan Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to develop an implementation plan for priority projects and programs identified in Task 5. The implementation plan will consider funding options, project schedules, and monitoring. We will specifically identify strategies which the City can implement on its own (such as changes to policies, transportation impact fees, or street typologies), and strategies where the City will need to work with its partner agencies and stakeholders to move forward (such as expansions in Caltrain service or formation of a TMA). The implementation plan will also determine how the City seeks to implement SB-743, including its preferred analysis approach, forecasting methodology, thresholds, and coordination approach across CEQA disciplines. Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Implementation chapter for the City’s review. We will incorporate one round of consolidated comments into the draft report (Task 7). Deliverables: Draft Implementation Chapter Task 7: Documentation Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft East of 101 Transportation Plan for the City’s review. We intend for the plan to be concise and graphically-oriented for a non-technical audience, building upon the interim deliverables of Tasks 2-6. We will respond to one round of consolidated comments prior to submitting a final plan. Possible Optional Tasks Fehr & Peers is prepared to support the City in a range of additional tasks that may arise during the plan. Such tasks could include: • Conceptual design of street improvements, such as changes to Grand Avenue or access to the relocated Caltrain Station • Traffic operations simulations of street or intersection improvements • Updates to the East of 101 model to incorporate transportation or land use changes • Renderings of proposed improvements • Development of a project website • Implementation of pop-up events or quick-build projects • Updates to the City’s TDM ordinance or monitoring program EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C INSURANCE CERTIFICATES [OPTIONAL] EXHIBIT D FORM 590 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. Report regarding a resolution accepting mid-year financial report and amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 adopted budget.(Richard Lee, Director of Finance) RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the mid-year financial report and amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 adopted budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Fiscal Year (FY)2017-18 mid-year report was presented to the Budget Standing Committee (BSC)on March 20,2018.The BSC is comprised of Mayor Liza Normandy and Council Member Pradeep Gupta.The mid-year report and accompanying budget amendments reflect direction from the BSC. This report summarizes the City’s mid-year financial status by providing an analysis of revenues and expenditures through the first half of the Fiscal Year for the General Fund,Airport Noise Insulation Project (ANIP)Fund,Public Education Government (PEG)Fund and Child Care Impact Fee Fund.The intent of this report is to provide Council with a brief update on how these funds are performing in comparison to the requested budget appropriations. General Fund Through the mid-year,total revenues are on track to exceed budgeted amounts inclusive of the proposed adjustments.Current revenues are estimated to exceed $104.7M,which combined with committed reserves from the prior year, total $112.4M in available General Fund resources. Total appropriations for the FY 2017-18 amended budget are $106.6M,and staff has requested an additional $1.5M via this mid-year adjustment.If approved,the mid-year adjustments will increase total appropriations for FY 2017-18 to $108.1M.It is anticipated that the General Fund will generate a net surplus of $4.3M at year- end.After funding General Fund reserves in compliance with the City’s Reserves Policy,staff will bring forth viable options to commit the remaining operating surplus for the City Council to consider at year end. General Fund Revenues Based on current year-to-date revenues,General Fund revenues are projected to be $112.4M,an increase of $1.78M over the amended budget.This increase is a mix of revenue types performing better than anticipated and others not reaching expected levels.Staff recommends that each of the revenue types below be adjusted as follows: City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 1 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. Property Taxes +$167,400 Property Taxes are expected to be slightly higher than projected with a year-end revenue expectation now at $31.2M. Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) Refund from County +$327,341 The ERAF property tax refund from the County is expected to be $2.5M at year-end,better than originally expected. Commercial Parking Tax -$700,000 Commercial Parking Tax revenue is expected to reach $3.4M at year-end,falling short of original projections. This reduction is in large part due to the delay in the completion of the parking structure at SFO,originally estimated to be in operation for half of the Fiscal Year. Building and Fire Permits +$1,000,000 Permit revenue is expected to be $10.2M at the end of the Fiscal Year.The revenue estimate has been adjusted up $1M due to the current strong development climate and demand for development services. Revenue from Other Agencies +$875,000 (one-time) Revenue from Other Agencies is now estimated to be $1.8M.The increase in expected revenue is due to anticipated reimbursement from the Office of Emergency Services (OES)and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for deployment of fire personnel. Charges for Services +$245,000 The Fire Department has implemented some ambulance revenue recovery elements which has produced an improved revenue stream.The increase is also partially due to a delay in billing in FY 2016-17 which has resulted in higher than average revenue for FY 2017-18. Fines -$655,000(one-time) The expected revenue related to fines was reduced to $163.5K due to the need to make a $655K payment the County and the State for services related to parking tickets.Part of the contract with the third party parking citation administrator requires the City to remit the County and State’s share ($12.25 per citation)to the County.This remittance has not occurred since November 2014,and once discovered,the City was required to remit the entire amount this year,reducing the overall ticket revenue.The oversight occurred as a result of staff changes in the Police Department and,due to a lack of process documentation,the information was not passed on when the staff member departed.The Departments of Finance and Police have put measures in place to ensure the remittance occurs in the appropriate timeframe going forward. Use of Money & Property +$520,000 (one-time) The increase in this revenue type is related to the sale of 178-190 Airport which took place in FY 2017-18.At the time of FY 2017-18 budget development, the sale had been anticipated to occur in FY 2016-17. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 2 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. General Fund Expenditures Including the $1.3M in requested mid-year appropriations,the General Fund is projected to generate an operating surplus of $4.5M.Mid-year appropriation requests are intended to be one-time appropriations to the current Fiscal Year budget and do not include on-going staff costs.There is one exception which,if approved, will have a multi-year impact.Each of the mid-year appropriation requests are described below and these exceptions are noted,and a summary of all mid-year budget requests is attached to the associated resolution. For the one exception where staffing costs would cross Fiscal Years,the portion of the appropriation request applicable to the mid-year request is shown in the Fund Summary and the portion applicable to the FY 2018-19 budget reflected only in the write-up.The remaining required appropriation will be entered through a decision package as part of the FY 2018-19 budget process.Unexpended funds for goods and services,which are encumbered as part of the purchase order process, will be rolled forward to FY 2018-19. Library Education Reimbursement +$4,000 The City’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)with the employee bargaining units allows for a reimbursement for educational pursuits.The Library has been able to absorb this additional cost in previous years,however requires $4,000 in additional appropriation to meet the demand in FY 2017-18.Staff will be reviewing this line item,and if deemed necessary for FY 2018-19,will enter a decision package for a similar increase in the FY 2018-19 budget. Parks &Recreation South San Francisco Unified School District (SSFUSD)After-School Summer Program +$44,729 (over two Fiscal Years)Upgrade of Position to Public Works Administrator +$11,500 The South San Francisco Unified School District (SSFUSD)will be offering a Science,Technology, Engineering,and Math (STEM)Program this summer and is asking the City to operate an after school program that would allow parents the option to extend the hours of childcare for program participants.SSFUSD currently proposes an elementary-school-aged after school program to take place at Spruce Elementary School and a middle-school-aged program to take place at Parkway Heights Middle.Both programs would take place from 1:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Exact program dates are still to be determined. The total estimated program cost for the City-operated after school program is $44,729,with $28,507 of the expenditures being requested as a FY 2017-18 mid-year budget adjustment.The $28,507 required for the current Fiscal Year is reflected in the General Fund Summary (please see Attachment 1).Staff anticipates including another $16,222 for the program as part of the FY 2018-19 budget through a decision package.Staff has included the entire cost of the program,$44,729 in this write up to ensure Council understands the whole cost of the program and that approval of this mid-year request,will necessitate the approval of the remaining $16,222 for FY 2018-19. In order to be cost-effective for the City,staff anticipates needing a minimum of 60 participants for the elementary school program at $470 per person,and 25 participants for the middle school program at $616 per person.Using these figures,staff anticipates receiving $43,600 in revenue for the program.Depending on Council’s support of the program in summer 2018,staff may request estimated expenditures for summer 2019 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 3 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. as part of the FY 2018-19 budget. The Parks and Recreation Department is recommending the elimination of an Administrative Assistant II position that was vacated by retirement in 2017,and its replacement with the higher level position of Public Works Administrator (Business Services Manager).Please see Attachment 6 for a current Parks and Recreation organization chart,and Attachment 7 for a proposed Parks and Recreation organization chart.In recent years the Parks and Recreation Department has grown both in the volume and scope of services provided,as well as in the sophistication of operations and administration.Encompassing four divisions,Administration,Recreation and Community Services,Parks and Landscape,and Facility Maintenance,expenditures are approximately $17 million,with projected revenue of approximately $4.4 million.Staffing includes 80 full-time and part-time regular employees,and an additional full time equivalent of 64 part-time staff,which in total is comprised of approximately 400 individuals.In addition to the day to day delivery of services,the Department is also very involved in a variety of capital improvement projects,which includes the Measure W campus,the development of public areas at Oyster Point,playground replacements,sports field and median upgrades,and a host of maintenance projects for City facilities. As the Department has evolved,there has been an organizational strategy of placing a strong,professional manager in charge of each division to serve as a division head over administration.Over the course of several budget years,the Department has been successful in establishing positions for a Recreation and Community Services Manager,Parks and Landscape Manager,and Facilities Maintenance Manager.This structure has proven to be very effective in creating a reasonable span of control for the managers,who work closely with subordinate supervisors,to ensure that line staff are accountable and properly supervised and supported and division work plans are accomplished. There are important administrative functions which cross divisional lines,which must be handled professionally and consistently department-wide,which include:budget development;monitoring expenditures and oversight of proper procurement and purchasing practices;oversight for the issuance of over 150 contracts and agreements each year;collection of revenue;systems administration for the Department’s complex registration and scheduling software;personnel administration to include personnel action forms,worker’s compensation claims,step increases,employee evaluations,and scheduling and supervision of three front offices,at the Municipal Services Building,Maintenance Services Building,and Joseph Fernekes Building; research on a variety of topics and the preparation of agendas and staff reports for the Parks and Recreation and Cultural Arts Commissions;identifying efficiencies;ensuring timely response to citizen inquiries;customer service quality control;making policy recommendations;writing grant applications and providing grant reporting;departmental webpage content and social media and outreach coordination;and utilization of Legistar for the writing and preparation of staff reports for City Council. These functions have been accomplished by a variety of staff,including the department head,Managers,and a key Administrative Assistant II with many years of experience,who retired in June of 2017.The Administrative Assistant II position has been vacant for eight months,during which time the Department has evaluated how resources can best be allocated.The Department proposes the elimination of the vacant Administrative II position and the addition of an administrative services division head,who would oversee the functions City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 4 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. position and the addition of an administrative services division head,who would oversee the functions described above.This would provide much needed administrative support,consistency,and oversight to all divisions,as well as providing direct supervision of the Administrative Assistant I at the Recreation office,the Administrative Assistant II at the Parks and Facilities office,an Office Specialist at the Joseph Fernekes Building,and a Management Analyst II.It should be noted that the existing position of Public Works Administrator matches the duties that have been proposed for this position in Parks and Recreation,with a working title of Business Services Manager. Fire Department Plan Check Services +$636,546 Ambulance Billing +$30,000 Prior to the retirement of the former Fire Marshal,all plan checking activity was performed wholly within the Fire Department.The former Fire Marshal was a certified Fire Protection Engineer and was capable of handling all plan checking.In July,after the FY 2017-18 budget process was completed,the Fire Marshal announced his retirement,requiring the department to investigate alternatives for providing this service.In November,the Fire Department began using a contract for plan check services that the Economic and Community Development Department (ECD)had in place to meet the demand for services.The provisions of the contract set the cost of plan checking services to be equal to 55 percent of the plan check fee collected by the City.The City retains the remaining 45 percent of the plan check fee to cover City costs associated with staff overseeing the work of the contractor and administering the process.After careful review of the anticipated demand for plan check services,the revenue impacts of the recent update to the fee schedule,and the plan check activity for the first six months of this Fiscal Year,Fire Department executive staff projects their cost of the contract to be $636,546. This assumes that plan check service activity remains constant for the continuation of the Fiscal Year. The requested budget appropriation is the full projected cost of all Fire Department plan check activity for the remainder of the Fiscal Year using the terms of the ECD contract,however Fire Department executive staff recognizes the cost impact and is evaluating several strategies to address future demand and minimize costs. The first strategy addresses internal plan check capabilities.Effective immediately,Fire Prevention Division staff has begun completing any plan checks for which they are qualified and have the capacity to complete.In the coming year,Fire Prevention personnel will be provided additional training in order increase their plan checking capability.The second strategy is to ensure that the City is receiving the best possible terms when utilizing contractors.To this end,a new Request for Proposal (RFP)is being created by the Fire Department to solicit bids for plan checking services that could potentially have better terms.The third approach is to utilize in -house temporary staffing and a search has begun to find hourly employees who have plan checking skills and can fulfill the Department’s plan checking needs.Fire believes these strategies will significantly reduce the need to use all of the requested funds and reduce the cost of plan checking for the Fire Department moving forward. The Fire Department is also asking for a $30,000 increase to the FY 2017-18 budget to provide for increased costs related to ambulance billing.Ambulance revenue recovery elements put in place by SSF Fire Department staff have produced an improved revenue stream resulting in higher contractor costs.Ambulance billing costs are a percentage of revenue recovered by the billing company.Wittman Enterprises,the City’s ambulance billing contractor,and Resolve Insurance Services,the secondary billing contractor,have processed all remaining accounts that were held by prior billing contractors.These accounts have yielded $245,000 in City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 5 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. remaining accounts that were held by prior billing contractors.These accounts have yielded $245,000 in additional revenue.Due to the delayed billing in FY 2016-17 that transitioned into FY 2017-18,revenues were higher than average in FY 2017-18,resulting in a corresponding increase in required expenditure to pay the billing contractor.Staff will reassess revenue projections and associated billing fees when preparing for the FY 2018-19 budget. Police Department Replacement Gas Masks and Cartridges +$10,000 After review of the current gas masks with the City’s safety consultant,Du-All Safety,staff is recommending replacement of eight gas masks and 90 associated cartridges.Replacement of the gas masks and cartridges will bring the department into compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. City Attorney City Attorney Fees +$125,000 The City Attorney’s Office is requesting a mid-year budget adjustment to account for additional general legal services.The City continues to produce a high volume of work,including several City led initiatives,all of which necessitate greater legal services than originally anticipated for this fiscal year.The City Attorney’s Office has provided and will continue to provide substantial support in structuring,strategizing and advising the City on these City led initiatives,including but not limited to Measure W Civic Campus project development, formation of Community Facility Districts (CFD),disposition of City-owned properties,and research and analysis related to potential development of City-owned properties with complex legal issues such as Oyster Point Marina.The increased volume and pace of City-led initiatives is anticipated to continue throughout the remainder of the current Fiscal Year. Public Works South City Shuttle +$28,200 There is a large demand of passengers on school days for the morning shuttle.The current shuttle does not have the capacity to meet this demand.The requested amount will provide for an overflow shuttle at a cost of $300 per day through May 31st. Public Works Various Capital Project +$500,000 The Public Works Department is requesting $250,000 in funding to be transferred from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 510)for the installation of 25 speed bumps in the Brentwood/Avalon neighborhood.For the last several months,staff conducted a pilot study and outreach to the community regarding traffic calming measures in the neighborhood.The installation of the speedbumps is the recommended conclusion of this work.If funding is authorized,staff anticipates installing the speedbumps prior to the end of the Fiscal Year. Public Works staff has requested a $250,000 General Fund Transfer to the Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 510)to fund the extension of Oak Avenue.As the planning and design for the Civic Center Campus and the sale of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC)property advances,staff will begin to plan for the Oak Avenue extension. It is anticipated, with authorized funding, the CIP will begin in Spring 2018. City Manager’s Office Public Policy Representation +$90,000 Miller Garage +$20,000 Performance City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 6 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. City Manager’s Office Public Policy Representation +$90,000 Miller Garage +$20,000 Performance Management Technology System +$20,000 Squire Patton Boggs Consulting represents the City in respect to public policy matters in Congress and the Executive Branch related to authorizing and funding a study of sea level rise and monitoring,and potentially assisting with obtaining funding for Caltrain electrification and the Department of Housing and Urban Development,Community Block Grant Program.The City Manager’s Office has been able to absorb some of this cost in the past, however additional funding is required in order to provide for this service for FY 2017-18. The City Manager Office is requesting $20,000 to provide funding for an architecture firm to develop two concept design options,plans,renderings and project budgets for the ~9,275 square feet of unfinished tenant space on the first floor of the Miller Street Parking Garage. The City Manager’s Office is requesting $20,000 for the acquisition of performance management and reporting software to enhance the City's ability to ensure accountability and adherence to the City's strategic plan and allow for greater transparency to Council.The City has a robust strategic plan developed by the City Council and City Staff to identify goals and priorities for the community.The challenge the City faces is identifying and tracking progress toward these goals with key metrics,and reporting out progress in an easy to update and understand format.Acquisition of a performance management technology system will provide Council and staff with reliable,unbiased data about City programs and initiatives.With key metrics in hand,City leaders can make decisions about which programs need to be adjusted,expanded or eliminated before programs are fully completed and resources are spent.The request includes an estimated $10,000 to acquire the system, $7,500 for initial installation and training of staff and $2,500 contingency.It is anticipated that the system will require an estimated $7,500 annually for licensing, upgrades, maintenance and customer support. Communications -City Manager’s Office Newsletters +$30,000 Additional Postcard +$7,500 Breezeway Banners +$5,000 The funding requested for the Communications Division includes translation,design and printing services for two Spanish and Chinese language newsletters;printing and postage for three additional Citywide newsletters; printing and postage for one additional postcard; and two breezeway banners. Requests from other Funds Information Technology PEG Funds (Fund 786) AV Equipment Upgrade for Council Chambers +$65,000 The microphones and control system in the Council Chambers requires replacement.This equipment can be moved to the new facility once it is completed.Funds are available in the PEG Fund (Fund 786)for this purpose (please see PEG Access Fund Summary in Attachment 2),and staff is requesting appropriation of the funds for this purpose. There are sufficient funds available for this request. City Manager’s Office ANIP Funds (Fund 221) ANIP Consultant +$10,000 Staff is requesting approval to expend $10,000 of Airport Noise Insulation Program (ANIP)funds to hire a consultant to audit the ANIP files to determine the number of potentially eligible homes remaining within the ANIP program boundary to expend remaining program funds.Sufficient resources are available to support this request.As of the mid-year,the fund has $761,000 in available cash (please see Attachment 3 for the ANIP City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 7 of 8 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-100 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5. request.As of the mid-year,the fund has $761,000 in available cash (please see Attachment 3 for the ANIP Access Fund Summary).No income earnings have been recorded thus far this fiscal year,so the revenue projection has been adjusted down $3,500 as reflected in the fund summary. Parks & Recreation Child Care Impact Fee Fund (Fund 830) Orange Library Feasibility Study +$100,000 There continues to be a high demand for child care in the City.The Parks &Recreation Department is requesting approval to use Child Care Impact Fees to conduct a study to analyze the feasibility of converting the Orange Library to a licensed preschool campus.The funding would include the feasibility study as well as provide for required site review and soil sampling.The Child Care Development Impact fee was established by a Nexus Study in 2001 for the purpose of funding the impact of property development on the demand for child care in the City.Staff is recommending adjusting the revenue estimate for this fund to $1.1M based on revenue already received this year which,with the requested appropriation,would result in a fund balance of just over $4.3M.There are sufficient resources available within this fund for the requested appropriation.Please see Attachment 4 for the Child Care Impact Fee Fund Summary. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the additional appropriations from the General Fund will result in a $1.5M increase to current appropriations for FY 2017-18.Inclusive of the proposed increases,it is anticipated that General Fund will end the fiscal year with an operating surplus of $4.3M.At year end,staff will calculate the amount of any surplus necessary to meet minimum reserve requirements CONCLUSION The City’s operating budget at the mid-year point remains on target.The additional revenues and offsetting appropriations maintain the City’s prudent financial position.Staff continues to recommend fiscal conservatism in light of the escalating pension costs. Attachments: 1.General Fund Summary 2.PEG Access Fund Summary (Fund 786) 3.ANIP Access Fund Summary (Fund 221) 4.Child Care Impact Fee Fund Summary (Fund 830) 5.Parks and Recreation Organization Chart - Current 6.Parks and Recreation Organization Chart - Proposed 7.PowerPoint Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 8 of 8 powered by Legistar™ FY 2017-18 MID-YEAR BUDGET GENERAL FUND SUMMARY Revenues Property Taxes 31,165,116$ 31,043,836$ 31,043,836$ 12,431,261$ 31,211,236 167,400$ ERAF Refund from County 2,240,713 2,222,250 2,222,250 - 2,549,591 327,341$ Sales Tax 15,592,823 16,279,876 16,279,876 6,096,714 16,279,876 -$ Transient Occupancy Tax 13,631,507 14,800,000 14,800,000 6,260,144 14,800,000 -$ Business License 1,553,879 1,459,665 1,459,665 687,862 1,459,665 -$ Commercial Parking Tax 3,582,349 4,083,400 4,083,400 1,174,955 3,383,400 (700,000)$ Franchise Fees 4,090,074 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,054,659 4,000,000 -$ Building and Fire Permits 7,823,402 9,232,477 9,232,477 7,082,470 10,232,477 1,000,000$ Revenue from Other Agencies 1,593,507 636,170 945,600 604,211 1,820,600 875,000$ Charges for Services 8,086,566 7,538,078 7,688,078 4,895,567 7,933,078 245,000$ Administrative Charges 1,365,265 1,395,923 1,395,923 700,462 1,395,923 -$ Fines 899,117 818,500 818,500 569,781 163,500 (655,000)$ Use of Money & Property 23,366,407 6,480,863 6,480,863 5,298,144 7,000,863 520,000$ Transfers In & Other 7,683,533 2,447,496 2,447,496 1,252,414 2,447,496 -$ Total Revenues 122,674,258$ 102,438,535$ 102,897,965$ 48,108,644$ 104,677,706$ 1,779,741$ Plus Committed Reserves from Prior Year 7,734,854 7,734,854 Total Revenues 110,632,819 112,412,560 Budget Expenditures City Council 206,951$ 246,918$ 246,918$ 111,688$ 246,918$ -$ 246,918$ City Clerk 606,884 642,681 666,810 310,913 666,810 -$ 666,810$ City Treasurer 110,559 130,861 130,861 60,525 130,861 130,861$ City Attorney 1,187,716 913,092 913,092 332,661 913,092 125,000$ 1,038,092$ City Manager 1,948,910 1,960,599 2,793,756 1,593,202 2,793,756 172,500$ 2,966,256$ Finance 2,613,471 2,595,665 3,065,771 1,379,040 3,065,771 -$ 3,065,771$ Non-Departmental 1,161,792 1,080,967 1,108,503 870,245 1,108,503 1,108,503$ Human Resources 1,571,645 1,625,221 1,675,256 776,812 1,675,256 -$ 1,675,256$ Economic & Community Development 7,158,564 7,216,002 10,565,208 3,431,886 10,565,208 -$ 10,565,208$ Fire 25,567,547 26,373,610 26,388,950 13,108,055 26,388,950 666,546$ 27,055,496$ Police 25,539,779 27,864,737 27,980,737 13,481,957 27,980,737 10,000$ 27,990,737$ Public Works 4,654,760 4,315,409 4,890,436 2,300,705 4,890,436 28,200$ 4,918,636$ Library 5,157,356 5,361,133 5,546,197 2,737,275 5,546,197 4,000$ 5,550,197$ Parks & Recreation 14,897,149 15,553,369 15,659,211 7,690,738 15,659,211 40,007$ 15,699,218$ CIP 1,483,332 1,200,000 3,259,475 187,134 3,259,475 500,000$ 3,759,475$ Transfers Out 3,532,272 1,720,600 1,720,600 290,000 1,720,600 1,720,600$ Total Expenditures 97,398,687$ 98,800,863$ 106,611,782$ 48,662,836$ 106,611,782$ 1,546,253$ 108,158,035$ 2016-17 Actual 2017-18 Adopted 2017-18 Amended 2017-18 YTD 2017-18 Projected 2017-18 Requested 2017-18 Proposed (Amended + Requested) 2016-17 Actual 2017-18 Adopted 2017-18 Amended 2017-18 YTD 2017-18 Projected Difference ATTACHMENT 1 PEG ACCESS FUND SUMMARY Revenues 2016-17 Actual 2017-18 Amended 2017-18 YTD Actual 12/31/17 2017-18 Projected 2017-18 Requested 2017-18 Proposed (Amended+ Requested) FRANCHISE FEES 182,289$ 125,000$ 45,655$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,454 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 Total Revenues 191,743$ 130,000$ 45,655$ 130,000$ -$ 130,000$ Expenditures SUPPLIES & SERVICES 2,880$ 46,500$ -$ 46,500$ 65,000$ 111,500$ Total Expenditures 2,880$ 46,500$ -$ 46,500$ 65,000$ 111,500$ Surplus/(Deficit)188,863 83,500 45,655 83,500 (65,000) 18,500 Cash Balance 935,886$ 1,019,386$ 1,019,386$ 954,386$ FUND CHANGES & HIGHLIGHTS: •$65,000 Audio visual equipment upgrade for Council Chambers. Cost includes equipment, installation and staff training. AT T A C H M E N T 2 FEDERAL AVIATION GRANT FUND Revenues 2016-17 Actual 2017-18 Amended 2017-18 YTD Actual 12/31/17 2017-18 Projected 2017-18 Requested 2017-18 Proposed (Amended+ Requested) INTEREST INCOME/INVESTMENTS 994$ 4,000$ -$ 4,000$ (3,500)$ 500$ Total Revenues 994$ 4,000$ -$ 4,000$ (3,500)$ 500$ Expenditures SUPPLIES & SERVICES 609$ -$ 667$ 667$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Total Expenditures 609$ -$ 667$ 667$ 10,000$ 10,000$ Surplus/(Deficit)386 4,000 (667) 3,333 (13,500) (9,500) Fund Balance 34,951$ 38,951$ 38,284$ 25,451$ FUND CHANGES & HIGHLIGHTS: •($3,500) Revenue reduction based on YTD and Prior Year Actual •$10,000 for consultant to audit Airport Noise Insulation Program files to determine the number of homes potentially eligible for program Cash Balance of Fund = $761,000 AT T A C H M E N T 3 CHILD CARE IMPACT FEES FUND SUMMARY Revenues 2016-17 Actual 2017-18 Amended 2017-18 YTD Actual 12/31/17 2017-18 Projected 2017-18 Requested 2017-18 Proposed (Amended Budget +Requested) Use of Money & Property 4,489$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Child Care Impact fees 522,858 - 936,737 936,737 1,067,000 1,067,000 Total Revenues 527,347$ -$ 936,737$ 936,737$ 1,067,000$ 1,067,000$ Carryover PO/CIP from prior year -$ -$ -$ 527,347$ -$ 936,737$ 936,737$ 1,067,000$ 1,067,000$ Expenditures Transfers 100,000$ 100,000$ Interdepartmental Charges 2,500$ 2,575$ 1,287$ 2,575$ -$ 2,575$ Total Expenditures 2,500$ 2,575$ 1,287$ 2,575$ 100,000$ 102,575$ Surplus/(Deficit)524,847$ (2,575)$ 935,450$ 934,162$ 967,000$ 964,425$ Fund Balance 3,386,611$ 3,384,036$ 4,320,773$ 4,351,036$ - Mid-Year Request: *$1,067,000- Increase in Childcare Impact fees based on January YTD. *$100,000 expenditure request for Orange Library Conversion to Child Care Feasibility Study AT T A C H M E N T 4 1.00 – Parks and Recreation Director Sharon Ranals Adm inistration Division Parks & Facilities 1.00 – Management Analyst II 1.00 – Administrative Assistant II Part Time Regular 0.50 – Cultural Arts Specialist 1.00 – Administrative Assistant II Parks Maintenance DivisionRecreation Division Faci lities Maintenance Division 1.00 – Recreation Program Manager 5.00 – Recreation & Comm. S ervi ces Sup ervisor 1.00 – Assistant Recreation Supervisor 10.00 – Recreation & Comm. Services Coordinator 8.00 – Preschool Teacher I/II 1.00 – Admin. Assistant I 1.00 – Recreation Leader IV 1.00 – Office Specialist (Childcare Tech) Part Time Regular 0.80 – Comm Srvcs Site Coordinator 1.82 – Recreation Leader III 1.25 – Recreation Leader II Hourly 0.50 – Office Assistant (hourly) 4.73 – Recreation Leader IV 33.54 – Recreation Leader III 12.54 – Recreation Leader II 1.75 – Recreation Leader I 6.16 – Recreation Instructor 1.00 – Van Driver 1.00 – Parks Program Manager 1.00 – Landscape Architect 2.00 – Parks Supervisor 2.00 – Tree Trimmer 2.00 – Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 2.00 – Groundsperson 1.80 – Sr. Park Maintenance Worker 14.0 – Park Maintenance Worker Hourly 1.62 – Park Maintenance Worker (hourly) 1.00 – Facilities Manager 1.00 – Facilities Supervisor 2.00 – Building Maintenance Craftsworker 2.00 – Lead Building Maintenance Custodian 4.00 – Sr. Building Maintenance Custodian 5.00 – Building Maintenance Custodian Hourly 2.08 – Building Maintenance Custodian (hourly) Common Greens Division 2.00 – Maintenance Craftsworker 1.20 – Sr. Park Maintenance Worker Current Organization Chart - Parks & Recreation Department ATTACHMENT 5 1.00 – Parks and Recreation Director Sharon Ranals Administ ration Division 1.00 - Public Works Administrator (Business Services Manager) 1.00 – Management Analyst II 1.00 – Administrative Assistant II 1.00 – Office Specialist (Childcare Tech) 1.00 – Admin. Assistant I Part Time Regular 0.50 – Cultural Arts Specialist 0.50 – Office Assistant (hourly) Parks Maintenance DivisionRecreation Division Facilities Maintenance Division 1.00 – Recreation Program Manager 5.00 – Recreation & Comm. Services Supervisor 1.00 – Assistant Recreation Supervisor 10.00 – Recreation & Comm. Services Coordinator 8.00 – Preschool Teacher I/II 1.00 – Recreation Leader IV Part Time Regular 0.80 – Comm Srvcs Site Coordinator 1.82 – Recreation Leader III 1.25 – Recreation Leader II Hourly 4.73 – Recreation Leader IV 33.54 – Recreation Leader III 12.54 – Recreation Leader II 1.75 – Recreation Leader I 6.16 – Recreation Instructor 1.00 – Van Driver 1.00 – Parks Program Manager 1.00 – Landscape Architect 2.00 – Parks Supervisor 2.00 – Tree Trimmer 2.00 – Lead Parks Maintenance Worker 2.00 – Groundsperson 1.80 – Sr. Park Maintenance Worker 14.0 – Park Maintenance Worker Hourly 1.62 – Park Maintenance Worker (hourly) 1.00 – Facilities Manager 1.00 – Facilities Supervisor 2.00 – Building Maintenance Craftsworker 2.00 – Lead Building Maintenance Custodian 4.00 – Sr. Building Maintenance Custodian 5.00 – Building Maintenance Custodian Hourly 2.08 – Building Maintenance Custodian (hourly) Common Greens Division 2.00 – Maintenance Craftsworker 1.20 – Sr. Park Maintenance Worker Proposed Organization Chart - Parks & Recreation Department ATTACHMENT 6 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL MARCH 28, 2018 FY 2017-18 Mid-Year Budget 1 AT T A C H M E N T 7 Overview General Fund Summary General Fund Revenues General Fund Mid-Year Budget Requests Other Fund Mid-Year Budget Requests 2 AT T A C H M E N T 7 General Fund Summary Total Revenues $ 104.7M Plus Carry Over PO & CIP from Prior Year $ 7.7M Total Resources Available $ 112.4M Total Expenditures $ 106.6M Mid Year Requests $ 1.5M Amended Expenditures $ 108.1M Projected Net Surplus $ 4.3M 3 AT T A C H M E N T 7 General Fund Revenues Property Tax +$167,400 ERAF Refund from County +$327,341 Commercial Parking Tax -$700,000 Building & Fire Permits +$1,000,000 Revenue from Other Agencies +$875,000 Charges for Services +$245,000 Fines -$655,000 Use of Money & Property +$520,000 4 AT T A C H M E N T 7 General Fund Mid-Year Budget Requests Library Education Reimbursement $4,000 Parks & Recreation After-School Summer Program $44,729 ($28,507 in mid-year; $16,222 FY 18-19 Budget Decision Pkg.) Position Upgrade to Business Services Manager $11,500 Fire Department Plan Check Services $636,546 Ambulance Billing $30,000 Police Department Replacement Gas Masks & Cartridges $10,000 City Attorney City Attorney Fees for General Legal Services $125,000 5 AT T A C H M E N T 7 General Fund Mid-Year Budget Requests Public Works South City Shuttle $28,200 Brentwood/Avalon Speedbumps $250,000 Oak Avenue Extension $250,000 City Manager’s Office Public Policy Representation $90,000 Miller Garage concept design $20,000 Performance Management Technology System $20,000 City Manager’s Office – Communications Division Additional Citywide and Translated Newsletters $30,000 Additional Postcard $7,500 Breezeway Banners $5,000 6 AT T A C H M E N T 7 Other Fund Mid-Year Budget Requests PEG Fund (786) AV Equipment Replacement for Council Chambers $65,000 Airport Noise Insulation Program (ANIP) Fund (221) ANIP Consultant $10,000 Projected Revenue reduced $3,500 based on YTD and prior year Child Care Impact Fee Fund (830) Orange Library Feasibility Study $100,000 Projected Revenue increase $1.1M based on YTD 7 AT T A C H M E N T 7 Recommendation Staff Recommends Council adopt a resolution to accept the mid-year financial report and amend the FY 2017-18 budget 8 AT T A C H M E N T 7 Questions/Discussion 9 AT T A C H M E N T 7 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-254 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:5a. Resolution accepting mid-year financial report and amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 adopted budget. WHEREAS,city staff presented the Fiscal Year (FY)2017-18 mid-year financial report to the Budget Standing Committee (BSC) on March 20, 2018; and WHEREAS,city staff incorporated direction and comments from the BSC and presented the FY 2017-18 mid- year financial report to the City Council. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby: 1.Accept the FY 2017-18 mid-year financial report; and 2.Amend the FY 2017-18 adopted budget based on the list of mid-year budget adjustments attached herein as Exhibit A. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ FUNDING REQUESTED FROM GENERAL FUND Department Fund Description of Item/Service Cost Justification/Purpose Library 100 Education Reimbursement (MOU benefit)4,000$ unfunded MOU benefit Parks & Recreation 100 SSF Summer Program 28,507$ A fee based after-school summer Park and Recreation program in collaboration with SSFUSD STEM Summer Program. Elementary program intended to serve 60 students and middle school program intended to serve 25 students Parks & Recreation 100 Upgrade of Administrative Assistant II to Public Works Administrator 11,500.00 A fee based after-school summer Park and Recration program ini collaboration with SSFUSD STEM Summer Program. Elementary program intended to serve 60 students and middle school program intended to serve 25 students Fire Department 100 Plan Check Services 636,546$ The fire marshal had conducted a majority of complex construction plan reviews in-house prior to his retirement in December, 2017. The fire marshal was also a licensed fire protection engineer and had capabilities no longer present in remaining prevention staff. The fire marshal’s retirement was not anticipated prior to submittal of the FY2017-18 budget. We have worked with ECD and the City Attorney to develop a third-party process to conduct construction plan reviews. Not having a new process would have caused construction plan reviews to fall behind and delay applicants and their projects. The requested amount was generated through a review of the first six months of the fiscal year plan check fees and the corresponding plan check services cost of the third-party plan check contractor. Staff reviewed the first six months of plan check activity and created an average monthly plan check fee/ third party plan check contractor cost estimate for comparison. Because of the large inconsistencies in plan check revenue versus cost per month, the difficulty of knowing the exact plan check activity for the remainder of the year, and the size of potential projects on the horizon that will require plan check review; staff feels it would be prudent to request an amount equal to the cost of activity that was created during the first six months of the fiscal year. Fire Department 100 Ambulance billing 30,000$ This request is to cover the increase in cost/expenditures related to contractual percentages of revenue which is higher than anticipated for FY2017-2018. Ambulance revenue recovery elements put in place by SSF Fire Department staff have produced an improved revenue stream. Wittman Enterprises, our billing contractor, and Resolve Insurance Services, our secondary billing contractor, have processed all remaining accounts that were held by prior billing contractors. These accounts have yielded $245,000 in additional revenue. Due to delayed billing in FY 16-17 that transitioned into FY2017-18, revenues are higher than average in FY 2017-18. Staff will reassess revenue projections and associated billing fees when preparing for the FY 2018-19 budget. Police Department 100 CBRN canisters for gas masks (90) & replacement gas masks.10,000$ Per DU-ALL Safety Consultant, gas masks(quantity 8) and associated cartridges (quantity 90) need to be replaced in order to be in compliance with OSHA regulations. City Attorney 100 City Attorney Fees 125,000$ The City Attorney’s Office is requesting a mid-year budget amendment to account for additional general legal services. The City continues to produce a high volume of work, including several City-led initiatives, all which necessitate greater legal services than originally anticipated for this fiscal year. The City Attorney’s Office has provided and will continue to provide substantial support in structuring, strategizing and advising the City on these City-led initiatives, including but not limited to Measure W Civic Campus project development, formation of CFDs, disposition of City-owned properties, and research and analysis related to potential development of City-owned properties with complex legal issues, such as the Oyster Point Marina. The increased volume and pace of City-led initiatives is anticipated to continue throughout the remainder of the current fiscal year. Public Works 100 Overflow shuttle for morning trip South City Shuttle 28,200$ There is a large demand of passengers on school days that the current shuttle does not have the capacity. This will pay for the costs to continue providing an overflow shuttle at a cost of $300 per day until May 31, 2018. Public Works - Transfer to Capital Improvement 100 25 Speed bumps in Avalon/Brentwood 250,000$ Over the last several months staff has been working with the Brentwood and Avalon neighborhoods to pilot and test traffic calming measures. After thorough study and community outreach the neighborhood and staff decided to install up to 25 speed humps at various locations. As soon as budget is appropriated staff will issue a notice to bid and anticipates the speed humps will be installed by end of June 2018. Public Works - Transfer to Capital Improvement 100 Oak Avenue Extension 250,000$ As the planning and design for the Civic Center Campus and the sale of the SFPUC property advances staff will begin to plan for the Oak Avenue extension. Planning for the CIP will begin in spring 2018. City Manager 100 Performance Management Technology System 20,000$ Acquisition of performance management and reporting software to enhance the City's ability to ensure accountability and adherence to the City's strategic plan and allow for greater transparency to Council. City Manager 100 Legislative Representation 90,000$ Squire Patton Boggs Consulting to represent the City of South San Francisco in respect to public policy matters in Congress and the Executive Branch related to authorizing and funding a study of sea level rise and monitoring, and potentially assist with obtaining funding for Caltrain electrification and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant Program. City Manager 100 Miller Garage 20,000$ Tenant Improvements for the Miller Garage City Manager- Communications 100 Translation Services for 2 Newsletters 2,500$ Per LA, cost is $1,250 per newsletter $600 each/Spanish, $650/each Chinese City Manager- Communications 100 Printing Translated 2 Newsletters 4,000$ Per LA, cost is $2,000 per translated newsletter City Manager- Communications 100 Design services for 2 Translated Newsletters 2,000$ Per LA, cost is $1,000 per translated newsletter City Manager- Communications 100 Printing 3 Citywide Newsletters 8,000$ Cost is $16,500 total ($5,500 each x 3). Surplus of $8,500 in 100-05130-5025 will cover excess cost. City Manager- Communications 100 Printing for 1 Additional Citywide Postcards 2,800$ Only 4 Citywide postcards budgeted in 100-05130-5025 City Manager- Communications 100 Postage for 3 Additional Citywide Newsletters 13,500$ $4,500 has been average cost of previous newsletter mailings City Manager- Communications 100 Postage for 1 Additional Postcard 4,700$ $4,700 has been average cost of previous citywide postcard mailings City Manager- Communications 100 Breezeway Banners 5,000$ 2 breezeway banners Total Additional GF Request 1,546,253$ 2017-18 Mid Year Budget Requests EXHIBIT A FUNDING REQUESTED FROM OTHER FUNDS Department Fund Description of Item/Service Cost Justification/Purpose Information Technology 786 AV Equipment Upgrade - Council Chambers 65,000$ AV Equipment Upgrade for Council Chambers - Cost includes Equipment, Install & Staff Training **Funding is available from fund balance, requesting appropriation to spend them City Manager 221 ANIP consultant 10,000$ Using existing balance of ANIP funds, hire a consultant to perform an audit of ANIP files in order to determine the number of potentially eligible homes remaining within the ANIP program boundary, to eventually spend down ANIP program funds. Parks & Recreation 830 Orange Library Feasibility Study 100,000$ Staff had been directed by the City Manager to obtain a high level cost estimate for the potential conversion of the main library to a licensed preschool campus. GENERAL FUND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS Department Fund Description of Item/Service Cost Justification/Purpose Fire 100 Other Agency Reimbursement 875,000$ Revenue associated with reimbursable overtime overtime costs increased due to a much higher fire season. This activity is reimbursable through various government agencies. Fire 100 Ambulance Revenue 245,000$ Additional Revenue related to Ambulance billing finance 100 Parking Citations (655,000)$ Accounts for county and state share of parking citation revenue that has not been remitted since November 2014, as well as projection for January - June 2018. finance 100 Sale of Real/Personal Property 520,000$ Sale of 178-190 Airport took place in FY 2017-18; was originally anticipated to take place in the prior year. finance 100 Property Tax 167,400$ Based on December YTD analysis finance 100 Excess ERAF 327,341$ Based on actual revenue received finance 100 Commercial Parking Tax (700,000)$ Long-term parking expansion was expected to open in July; still under construction ECD 100 Building Inspection Permits 1,000,000$ Based on December YTD analysis Total Additional GF Revenue 1,779,741$ OTHER FUND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS Department Fund Description of Item/Service Cost Justification/Purpose Parks & Recreation 830 Child Care Impact Fees 1,067,000$ Based on January YTD City Manager 221 ANIP Fund (3,500)$ Based on January YTD & Prior year actual REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS EXHIBIT A City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-112 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:6. Report regarding a resolution approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Center as part of the Community Civic Campus Project for a six month term in an amount not to exceed $76,000,and approving budget amendment 18.027.(Deborah Gill, Special Projects Manager) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding a Consulting Services Agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Center as part of the Community Civic Campus Project for a six month term in an amount not to exceed $76,000, and approving budget amendment 18.027. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On November 3,2015,South San Francisco residents approved Measure W,a half-cent transactions and use tax. The transactions and use tax went into effect on April 1, 2016. The City intends to use revenue from the transaction and use tax to fund the construction of a proposed Community Civic Campus Project (“Project”). The Project will include a new Police Station, a new Fire Station, and a shared Library and Parks and Recreation Community Center on an 8-acre site along South San Francisco’s El Camino Real at Chestnut Avenue and at Arroyo Drive and Camaritas Avenue. A Master Architect, The Smith Group, was selected and approved by City Council January 24, 2018. More information on the project can be found on the project’s website:<http://www.measurewssfcivic.com>. Request for Proposals The City of South San Francisco is interested in retaining a fundraising consultant to provide fundraising services to the City and manage a multi-year Capital Campaign to raise money needed to finance a new state-of -the-art Community Center.The City sought proposals from interested Fundraising Consultants that will provide the following services as two separate components: ·Proposal I: A campaign planning study and capital campaign plan; and ·Proposal II: Implementation of a multi-year fundraising campaign. Staff issued the RFP on November 2,2017,and closed the response period on December 11,2017.The RFP was issued on the City website and ebidboard,as well as circulated to a list of 10 leading California capital campaign fundraising consulting agencies.A total of two proposals were received.The Review Board consisted of two members of the South San Francisco Public Library Foundation Board and three staff members from the Parks and Recreation Department,Library,and City Manager’s Office.They concluded that there was an insufficient level of response to make a decision.The RFP was re-issued on January 2,2018 (please see City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-112 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:6. insufficient level of response to make a decision.The RFP was re-issued on January 2,2018 (please see Attachment 1)and staff closed the response period on February 16,2018.The RFP was issued on the City website,ebidboard,the Foundation Center,and Association of Fundraising Professionals Golden Gate Chapter, as well as circulated to a list of 14 leading California capital campaign fundraising consulting agencies.A total of six proposals were received from: ·Brakeley Briscoe Inc. ·Convergent Nonprofit Solutions ·Hartsook ·Lester Consulting Group ·Library Strategies, and ·Partnership Resources Group Proposal Review The Review Board consisted of two members of the South San Francisco Public Library Foundation Board and three staff members from the Parks and Recreation Department,Library,and City Manager’s Office.They reviewed the proposals individually and discussed their proposed scope and services based on presentation, project understanding,experience with similar projects,and value (which includes budget).The three highest firms were invited for interviews during the week of March 5th.The review panel met with Partnership Resources group in person,Library Strategies via conference call,and Brakeley Briscoe Inc.in person with one of their team calling in remotely. Please see Attachment 2 for an aggregate scoring of the interviews. Based on the interviews,qualifications submitted,and discussions with references,Partnership Resources Group was rated the highest firm.A consulting services agreement with Partnership Resources Group for fundraising services for Proposal I would bring their comprehensive knowledge and experience of similar public agency projects,as well a competitive and inclusive fee structure.Please see Attachment 3 for their proposal. On March 19,2018 the Library Foundation Board met,discussed Partnership Resources Group’s proposal,and are in favor of hiring them for fundraising services outlined in Proposal I. Proposal I,a campaign study and campaign plan will take approximately 6 months and help determine what size of a fundraising campaign is feasible.Additional deliverables include identification of key fundraising messages,assistance with development of collateral and promotional fundraising materials,and training key stakeholders,including Foundation Board members,Friends groups,and community supporters and volunteers, in campaign messaging and identification of potential donors.Once the Proposal I workplan is complete,staff will evaluate the findings and bring recommendations back to City Council in order to help determine whether to proceed with Proposal II: implementation of a multi-year fundraising campaign. FUNDING The cost of this grants consulting contract is $76,000 for six months.Approving budget amendment 18.027 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-112 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:6. The cost of this grants consulting contract is $76,000 for six months.Approving budget amendment 18.027 would provide funding for this contract in the City of South San Francisco Fiscal Year (FY)2017-18 Measure W budget. CONCLUSION Approval of the resolution will allow the City Manager to execute a six-month consulting services agreement with Partnership Resources Group;they can carry out a campaign planning study and capital campaign plan in support of the Community Center to help determine if a multi-year fundraising campaign would be feasible. Attachments: 1.Community Center Fundraising Consultant RFP 2.Aggregate scoring - interviews 3.Partnership Resources Group Proposal City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO’S NEW LIBRARY/COMMUNITY CENTER – PLANNING STUDY, CAMPAIGN PLAN AND FUNDRAISING Introduction The City of South San Francisco requests proposals from fundraising consultants interested in planning and managing a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the building of a shared new Main Library/Community Center as part of the larger Community Civic Campus Project. The new Library/Community Center is a shared facility between the City of South San Francisco’s Library Department and Parks and Recreation Department. Estimated Library/Community Center project costs are $84.2 million, with approximately $10 million needed from private donations to fulfill community goals of an engaging and flexible literacy, learning and wellness center. Fundraising activity will occur from April 2018 through December 2022. Design, construction, and project closing phases are expected to occur from 2018 – 2022. The Community Civic Campus Project On November 3, 2015, South San Francisco residents approved Measure W, a half-cent transactions and use tax. The transaction and use tax went into effect on April 1, 2016. The City intends to use revenue from the transaction and use tax to fund the construction of a proposed Community Civic Campus Project (Project). Feedback on site plan options and programming was solicited from the community for a proposed community civic campus on June 14, 2016 as part of the State of t he City and Measure W Town Hall. With support and agreement from the community, the Project will include a new Police Station, a new Fire Station, and a shared Library and Parks and Recreation Community Center on an 8-acre site along South San Francisco’s El Camino Real at Chestnut Avenue. A Master Architect for the project was selected by City Council, City of South San Francisco, on November 20, 2017; the City is negotiating the final contract and will bring to City Council for approval at the January 24, 2018 City Council meeting: SmithGroupJJR. The Project would construct three buildings. A joint 92,000 square foot Library and Community Center would potentially include performing arts spaces, dance studios, multimedia exhibition areas, innovative technology learning centers and makerspaces, collaborative work, study and meeting spaces, classrooms, multi-use City Council Chambers, library collections, children’s library, licensed preschool, a banquet hall with commercial kitchen, a public rooftop area and outdoor programming and fitness spaces. The second building on the El Camino/Chestnut site would house South San Francisco’s Police Department, and the Information Technology (IT) Department. This approximately 44,000 square foot building will include police administration, operations, investigation and support services, and emergency dispatch, IT services, and bike and vehicle parking. A new 7,250 square foot Fire Station located across El Camino at Arroyo and Camaritas would include a drive through bay for fire engines, a turnout and decontamination area, office space, living quarters, a small patio, and parking spaces. More 2 information on the project can be found on the project’s website: http://www.measurewssfcivic.com. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The City of South San Francisco is interested in retaining a fundraising consultant to provide fundraising services to the City and manage a multiyear Capital Campaign to raise money needed to finance a new state-of-the-art new Library and Community Center. The City is seeking proposals from interested Fundraising Consultants that will provide the following services as two separate components:  Proposal I: A campaign planning study and capital campaign plan; and  Proposal II: Implementation of a multi-year fundraising campaign. Upon review of proposals, the City may elect to enter into an agreement for one component, both components, or none of the components. Proposal I – Campaign Planning Study and Capital Campaign Plan Phase 1 - Conduct a Capital Campaign Planning Study (90-120 days) that includes:  Determine realistic fundraising goals  Identify specific fundraising goals and costs (i.e. technology learning center and makerspace, creative arts and performance spaces, children’s story time theater, literacy tutoring center, early childhood and licensed preschool areas, etc.) linked to the Library’s and Parks and Recreation’s Strategic Plans  Identify prospective major individual, corporate and foundation donors as well as grant and naming rights opportunities  Work with the Library Foundation Board, Library and Parks and Recreation Friends groups, community leaders and City staff to organize a Capital Campaign Steering Committee and identify campaign messages and key prospects  Conduct confidential interviews with potential lead donors and community leaders  Coordinate fundraising goals and messaging with the Architect’s project costs, scope and community meetings Assist in the development of a short promotional video to share with prospective donors Phase 2 – Develop a Capital Campaign Plan (90-120 Days)  In partnership with the Capital Campaign Steering Committee, develop a Capital Campaign plan, finalize fundraising goals and key fundraising messages for each year of the Project as part of a Capital Campaign calendar  Work with the Director of Communications to develop collateral and promotional materials and utilization of social networking opportunities  Train Foundation Board, volunteers (including Friends groups) and staff in campaign messaging and identifying potential donors  Assist in development of a volunteer Campaign Group which may include members of the Capital Campaign Steering Committee 3 Proposal II – Implementation of a Multi-Year Fundraising Campaign Phase 3 – Execute/Manage the Campaign  Manage campaign prospect identification and evaluation ; assist in the identification and securing of “lead gifts”  Work with the Director of Communications in refinement of campaign materials  Oversee prospect calls and follow-ups assisted by staff and volunteers  Promote donor stewardship and cultivation  Work with Library Foundation Board to identify potential campaign events  Develop donor tracking and assist with donor recognition  Work with the Director of Communications, Library Foundation Board and staff on the management of public information and a public relations plan SCHEDULE The City would like to conclude the fundraising study and plan by November 30, 2018, and, if the City elects to proceed with the implementation, conclude the fundraising campaign by December 2021. The preliminary schedule for the overall project is: Consultant Selection: March 15, 2018 Campaign Planning Study (Phase One): Through June/July 2018 Campaign Plan (Phase Two): Through September/October 2018 Campaign Launch and Execution (Phase Three): Beginning October/November 2018 through December 2021 PROPOSAL FORMAT The following information should be provided by all respondents. Each responding Consultant shall address the following items in their submittals in the order set forth. Please limit the total length of all proposals to 20 pages (not including staff resumes). Estimated price and terms for services should be provided separately, listing breakdown scope of services in a sealed envelope marked “Estimated Price & Terms for Services.” Any cover letters, supporting materials, and required attachments will not be counted in this total. However, please limit additional materials to a reasonable amount. Please address the following areas in your response:  Description of the firm: structure, areas of expertise, number of years in business, number of employees and other data that helps to characterize the firm, addresses of the main office and the office that will manage the project .  Experience: Briefly describe a minimum of four, but no more than five projects for relevant public sector clients for whom you have performed similar work from 2008 - present to demonstrate experience relevant to the proposal. For each project listed, provide the name, address, and a contact name of the client’s representative who can be contacted regarding your performance. Include the name of the lead firm in cases where you worked in partnership or in an auxiliary capacity. Please provide details on fundraising goals and success rates. 4  Strategy: Describe your strategy for identifying and cultivating major donors for the Project. Submit a statement on why you believe your firm is best qualified to carry out the project. Explain how you support clients who do not have a large infrastructure in place for high level fundraising.  Personnel: Provide professional resumes for the key people to be assigned. Include those of consultants and describe their relevant experience. Describe proposed responsibilities of key people. Identify the person who would be the primary contact point for the client. Provide an organizational chart of the project team.  Volunteers: Provide a detailed explanation of how you would pre pare volunteers for fundraising activities including pursuing donations on the local, neighborhood level, through connections with corporations and foundations.  Progress reports: explain how and how often you will convey progress to City staff and the Library Foundation.  Work Plan: Include a detailed work plan and timeline for all three identified phases. Provide a narrative description of how the firm proposes to execute the project.  Costs: Please provide an itemized estimated price and terms for all of your services by Phase, separately listing a breakdown of the scope of services. All responses should also address the following issues: 1. Describe your experience and success in grant writing and working with corp orate foundations as part of capital campaign fundraising; be specific; provide suggestions for the SSF campaign. 2. Describe your experience and success using matching gift programs; be specific. 3. How familiar are you or your firm with the South San Francisco demographic s? Describe any work you have done with an organization with similar demographics in the past. 4. Provide any vendor relationships you are proposing as part of this proposal. 5. What is your testing and support plan for campaign messaging and communications? 6. Identify possible alternatives for raising funds. 7. What role would staff, Library Foundation and the Friends groups need to take in the study and campaign? CONSULTANT SELECTION The following criteria will be used in evaluating responses:  Relevant experience and quality of four – five similar projects, with references.  Demonstrated experience and qualifications of individual(s) to be assigned to the campaign.  Consultant’s design approach to the project, including ability to meet a tight fundraising schedule.  Firm’s or individual’s understanding of socio-economic communities and business sectors similar to South San Francisco.  Campaign strategy’s fit with South San Francisco’s values and operations. The City may or may not choose to conduct telephone, online or in person interviews. 5 Following proposal scoring, the top ranked firms or individuals, including the staff to be assigned to this campaign, will be expected to travel to South San Francisco at their own expense for an interview. The City will negotiate with the top firm. The firm will be selected based on professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and demonstrated competence that includes a proven track record of performing similar work. The skill and ability of the entity performing the services is a key component of the selection criteria. Cost will be only one factor in determining the selection, and as such, the contract might not be awarded to the lowest responsible firm. If successful negotiations cannot be achieved with the top firm, the City will review the applicants and may negotiate with additional top ranked firms. Once a consultant is selected, staff will make a recommendation to the City Council. Final selection of a Consultant shall be at the sole discretion of the City Council. A copy of the City’s Standard Consulting Agreement is attached. Consultants interested in proposing on this RFP should be prepared to enter into the agreement under the standard terms and should be able to provide the required insurance. RFP RESPONSES AND DUE DATE Proposals are due by 3:00 p.m. on Friday, February 16th. Proposals can be emailed to Deborah Gill at deborah.gill@ssf.net or via mail (without bindings, on 8 1/2 x11 paper) to: Deborah Gill, Special Projects Manager City Manager’s Office City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Submissions received by the City of South San Francisco after the above stated time will not be considered. For questions regarding this RFP, please contact Deborah Gill at (650) 829-6604, or via e-mail at deborah.gill@ssf.net. Tentative dates for consultant interviews are the week of February 26th, 2017. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Consultants are advised to become familiar with all conditions, instructions, and specifications of this RFP. By submitting a proposal, Consultant represents and warrants that it has thoroughly examined and is familiar with work required under this RFP, that Consultant has conducted such additional investigation as it deems necessary and convenient, that Consultant is capable of providing the services requested by the City in a manner that meets the City’s objectives and specifications as outlined in this RFP, and that Consultant has reviewed and inspected all materials submitted in response to this RFP. Once the consultant has been selected, a failure to 6 have read the conditions, instructions, and specifications herein shall not be cau se to alter the contract or for Consultant to request additional compensation. NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENT By submitting a proposal, the Consultant represents that it and its subsidiaries do not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, marital status, physical condition, pregnancy or pregnancy-related conditions, political affiliations or opinion, age, or medical condition. CONDITIONS OF PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal for this RFP, or to procure or contract for any services. The City reserves the right to: waive any minor irregularities or informalities contained within an RFP, and/or reject any or all proposals received as a result of this request, and negotiate with any qualified consultant, or to cancel the RFP in part or whole. All proposals and material submitted will become the property of the City of South San Francisco and will not be deemed confidential or proprietary. The City of South San Francisco reserves the right to award in whole or in part, by item or group of items, by section or geographic area, when such action serves the best interests of the City. The City and Consultant may agree to add additional areas to the contr act by mutual agreement at a later date. The City may elect to stop work at any time in the contract and will pay for work completed to that point on a time and material basis. Selection Criteria Total Possible Points Brakeley Briscoe Inc.Library Strategies Partnership Resources Group Tell us about your firm and what interests you in this project. Please include any experience related to capital campaigns successfully completed projects.150 105100122 What do you know about South San Francisco?125 9460106We do not have a fundraising base; what is your plan? What would your first 30, 60, 90 days look like?100 737382What other tools or resources are needed for the fundraising level sought?50 393644Give a time when you went above and beyond the requirements for a project.50 252837What major challenges have you faced in similar projects? How did you handle them?25 161718 Total500311269354 PROPOSAL TO: The City of South San Francisco For: Library and Community Center Planning Study, Campaign Plan and Fundraising From: Partnership Resources Group February 16, 2018 Prepared by: Elliot Levin & Melissa Irish, Study Consultants PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Who We Are pp. 3 II. PRG Qualifications pp. 4 III. Primary Products and Activities of the Consultation pp. 7 IV. Consulting Team pp. 13 V. Costs and Project Timetable Notes pp. 14 (Estimated Price & Terms for Services sent separately) VI. Appendices pp. 15 Elliot Levin Resume Melissa Irish Resume Stephanie Bruzzese Resume Detailed Work-Plan and Timeline (included as separate excel document attached to email) Sample Brochures (included as separate documents attached to email): o Whistlestop o Pacific Vision o SAY Dream Center PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 3 CAPITAL FUNDRAISING PLANNING & ASSESSMENT The Partnership Resources Group (“PRG”) is pleased to provide this proposal in response to the City of South San Francisco’s (“South City”) request for consultation to guide and conduct capital fundraising planning to support the Main Library/Community Center component of the new Community Civic Campus Project. PRG is a fundraising consulting firm based in the San Francisco Bay Area that specializes in the development of capital and endowed funds for nonprofit and public agency programs. The firm has 26 years of experience in assessing, creating and implementing multi-faceted capital funding strategies that blend foundation gifts, corporate sponsorship, public sector grantmaking, and individual giving. PRG has planned and managed fundraising programs ranging from $500,000 to $120,000,000. Accordingly, the Partnership Resources Group submits this proposal to address “Proposal 1 – Campaign Planning Study and Capital Campaign Plan” and “Proposal II – Implementation of a Multi-Year Fundraising Campaign” as outlined in the South City’s Request for Proposals. I. THE PARTNERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP – WHO WE ARE Elliot Levin founded the Partnership Resources Group in 1991 with the simple belief that fundraising is about people, communities, and what makes their lives better. This belief was forged during a twenty- year career on the front lines of service providers, starting as an eager outreach worker on the streets of Chicago and eventually as the CEO of one of the Bay Area’s largest nonprofits. Community Centers are in Elliot’s “DNA,” beginning at a Boys & Girls Club in Chicago, to the YMCA’s in Los Angeles and finally with the Jewish Community Centers (JCCs) of San Francisco, Marin, and the Peninsula. It was during his CEO tenure with the JCCs that he led the capital funding for and development of new, full-service community centers in Foster City, San Rafael, and San Francisco. Now in its 26th year, PRG has led fundraising initiatives throughout Northern California and has blossomed across many service sectors, including health care, housing, education, museums, disability services, and the arts. Yet community centers and all that they have become – the “central address” for a community – remains at the core of our company’s values. The firm has long recognized the unique character of the public-private partnership and has found ways to mobilize these consortia. Public sector agencies are an important part of the service fabric but generally lack the experience or know-how to effectively tap philanthropy. PRG has brought together funders with cities, counties and special districts toward common interests. These have included community center and library projects in Antioch, San Rafael, Livermore, and Marin City. The partnership also became a reality in the creation of the Housing Trust of Silicon Valley, the nation’s first not-for-profit housing trust through a funding coalition of fifteen cities, the County of Santa Clara, and six nonprofit service providers. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 4 PRG is an LLC with offices in San Rafael, California. The firm has six Senior Associates that are the professional core of the group and twelve other Associates, each a skilled practitioner in a particular discipline including grant writing, donor and prospect research, and communications. The thread that unifies our work is the identification and development of major gifts toward larger-scale capital, endowment, and sustaining funds programs. PRG has developed a working knowledge of the City of South San Francisco, and our lead consultants have gained preliminary insights from the architect team at Group 4 who created the South City’s master plan to understand the origins and development of this incredible project. Through these conversations and review of the South City’s strategic plans, we have become familiar with the dynamic economic development activities taking place in South City and how these efforts can impact the development of this project and future gifts to support its vision. PRG “goes deep” in everything that we do; getting to know a community, not simply the details of a proposed facility, is key to our work. In the very early phases, we seek to closely integrate with the client’s leadership and key constituents. II. PRG’s QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH FRANCISCO PROJECT Over the past 26 years, PRG has completed 42 capital campaign studies and has served as consultants on the implementation of 39 campaigns. Campaigns for libraries, community centers, and civic projects include: 1. Albert J. Boro Community Center & Library (formerly Pickleweed Park Community Center) PRG managed the capital fundraising campaign for the community center and library complex at Pickleweed Park in San Rafael, a City of comparable size to South San Francisco. The project is located in the densely populated Canal district of San Rafael, comprised primarily of low income and immigrant families. Originally projected at $8 million, the project grew to $10 million over the course of the “Dream Campaign.” Working with the mayor, residents of the Canal neighborhood, library staff, and a volunteer campaign committee of countywide leaders, PRG’s consultation led to achieving the original financial target, then reframing the campaign mid-course to achieve an additional $2 million in support. The project was completed in 2009 and is now planning a Phase II effort to expand and enhance its sports fields with guidance from PRG. Contact: David Donery, former Pickleweed Park Center Supervisor and now San Anselmo Town Manager 525 San Anselmo Ave., San Anselmo, CA 94960 415.258.4600 ddonery@townofsananselmo.org PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 5 2. Robert Livermore Community Center 1 The Livermore Recreation and Parks Department (LARPD) developed the new, full-service Robert Livermore Community Center largely with proceeds from Measure A, a parcel tax measure that funded the creation of the community center, library, and a new elementary school. Measure A was one of the first ballot measures that served multiple entities and multiple projects in a single measure. PRG was engaged by the LARPD to first study and then consult on a private sector capital campaign of $7 million to augment ballot measure proceeds and complete the funding for the community center. The Study concluded that a $5 million goal was achievable. Subsequent to the Study, PRG provided campaign consultation through a volunteer campaign leadership committee for a capital fundraising program that eventually achieved $5.2 million from institutional and individual donors. 3. Marin City Center for Community Life In 2015, the Marin South City Community Services District (MCCSD) commissioned PRG to conduct a capital funds feasibility assessment for a $24 million proposed new community center and recreation complex, located on a district-owned campus that would include a community health clinic and new MCCSD offices. Marin City is an unincorporated community with a substantial number of low-income families living in public or subsidized housing. PRG convened a “blue ribbon” task force to advise on the Study, comprised of local residents and leaders from outside the community and chaired by County Supervisor Katherine Sears. The Study concluded that a $10 million private fundraising goal was achievable and that the balance of capital funds would be available from government sources and New Market Tax Credits. PRG was subsequently engaged to devise the campaign implementation plan and then served as campaign consultants for the lead gifts phase. Approximately $7.5 million was raised in the early phase. The project is now in the midst of the entitlements process and reframing its scope per the wishes of a newly elected District board. The District General Manager who led the project and to whom PRG reported has left MCCSD to assume a position as Vice President of the Marin Community Foundation. Contact: Johnathan Logan, Vice President, Marin Community Foundation 5 Hamilton Landing, Suite 200 Novato, CA 94949 415.464.2500 jlogan@marincf.org 4. Caritas Village Caritas Village is an $80 million joint venture between Catholic Charities, Burbank Housing, and the City of Santa Rosa to develop a service center and affordable housing campus in downtown Santa Rosa for families at risk of homelessness or displaced by the recent wildfires. 1 PRG offers this 2004- 5 project as an example recognizing that it occurred before the 2008 project cutoff specified in this South City RFP. In the ensuing 13 years the relevant LARPD leadership has retired or has left the District. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 6 PRG was commissioned in 2016 to conduct a feasibility assessment of $16 million in charitable gifts and grants for the Caritas Center element of the campus. The remainder of the facilities will be financed by government funds and affordable housing tax credits. The Study was conducted working closely with a task force of community leaders and found that approximately $10 million in philanthropic support was achievable. Subsequently, PRG developed a detailed campaign implementation plan and is now serving as the capital campaign consultants for the lead gifts phase of the campaign. Thus far, $6.7 million in charitable commitments have been made to this project. Contact: Len Marabella, Executive Director, Catholic Charities 987 Airway Court Santa Rosa, CA 95403 707.528.8712 Lmarabella@srcharities.org 5. Other Public Sector Agencies and Nonprofits for whom PRG has provided similar fundraising consultation: • San Geronimo Valley Community Center – gymnasium capital campaign and endowment campaign • Bolinas Firehouse & Community Center – capital campaign • California Parks and Recreation Association – capital fundraising training seminars • Peninsula Jewish Community Center – endowment campaign • City of Antioch – Gateway Community Center campaign • County of Santa Clara – Housing Trust campaign PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 7 III. PRIMARY PRODUCTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE CONSULTATION PRG proposes to conduct the overall consultation in concert with a Capital Fundraising Planning Task Force that would include the key South City staff, Library Foundation Board members, individuals from the “Friends” groups for the Library and Parks and Recreation, select Council members(s), and influential leaders from the local community. The Task Force’s involvement is important to the eventual implementation of a large-scale fund development program as it may form the nucleus of a campaign leadership team. As a group, the Task Force provides knowledge of South City and the facts about the community center/library project while serving as a sounding board for the consultants. This group is also the bridge between the work of the consultants and the entities responsible for implementation. PRG proposes a series of deliverable items per the objectives: A. CAMPAIGN PLANNING STUDY – Proposal I, Phase 1 PRG will design and conduct a study to provide South City with data relevant to two fundamental questions on how or even whether to launch a major fundraising effort: Under what conditions will individuals of wealth, businesses, and funding institutions support the initiative? and; What specific levels of financial support will most likely ensue if these conditions are satisfied? Criteria for Measuring Feasibility The Assessment will test for the presence and strength of five elements essential in achieving larger- scale fundraising success: 1. Strength of the Case The “Case” is everything in a competitive fundraising environment. It must resonate strongly with major donor prospects, reflect their concerns and passions, specifically describe the proposed capital program, and serve as an overall rallying cry for the initiative. Conversations about the case will enable the South City to learn about perceptions, image, and other concerns relevant to fundraising. Working in conjunction with the Task Force, PRG will use our skilled writing team to draft a campaign “Case Statement” specific to the potential funding market and, thereafter, test its effectiveness with select major donor prospects and individuals who are influential in South City and the general service area. The Case draft will also include proposed naming rights opportunities to test how they may influence interest and giving, and the results will be folded into the campaign strategy to guide solicitation of select prospects. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 8 2. Depth of the Prospect Pool There must be a sufficient number of potential donors in the prospect pool from which to draw a qualified group of donors. The size of this prospect base is a quantifiable indicator of fundraising feasibility. Access to these individuals is likewise a key determinant. PRG anticipates that a blend of corporate, foundation, and individual donors will be required to get an accurate gauge on true, aggregate giving potential. PRG is capable of uncovering potential donors unknown to members of the task force or others in South City. This aspect is addressed further in this proposal. 3. Available Leadership Campaign feasibility is closely linked to the availability of credible, committed volunteer leaders who are prepared not only to make their own substantial financial commitments but also to ask others to participate financially. The Assessment will measure both the number of individuals who might lead the campaign as well as South City’s ability to access and recruit them. 4. Timing PRG will assess the effect of potentially competing fundraising forces in the study area by evaluating other campaigns now underway or in the planning stages. No matter how effective the case, how deep the pool of prospects, or how strong the leadership base, external forces can have a decisive impact on campaign feasibility and timing. 5. Organizational Readiness Conducting a $10 million campaign will require the efficient and robust functioning of campaign systems, donor records, communications, and project leadership that inspires confidence. PRG will “audit” the South City’s internal capability to manage and support a large-scale campaign or alternative administrative approaches. This review typically includes staffing capabilities and availability, data management system(s), and general readiness to absorb the internal administrative functions necessary in any campaign. The audit is not an evaluation of South City staff or systems. Rather, it identifies what exists and what enhancements may be necessary to support a capital campaign. Methodologies PRG will draw on a variety of methods to gather data appropriate to measure campaign feasibility. The first and primary approach is a series of confidential, one-on-one interviews with up to 32 individuals selected because they have the financial capacity to make a “leadership gift” or have substantial access to such individuals or funding organizations. In our experience, this is the minimum sample size from which to draw reliable measurements for a $10 million study. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 9 The consultants will conduct the interviews using a questionnaire developed specifically for this assessment that will ensure consistency and comparability across all interviews. The quality of the data and the integrity of the process rely on the confidentiality of the interviews. All findings, therefore, will be reported without attribution unless otherwise specified by the respondent. PRG recommends choosing a diverse interview cohort for the assessment that would include known supporters of South City programs/services, South City residents assumed to possess high-giving capacity, senior management of technology companies, leaders from the business community at-large, foundation executives, elected officials, and others of influence. PRG will augment the cohort with names from our in-house prospect files that may hold promise as donors or campaign leaders. There is a long time, strong and growing presence of technology companies in South City. These companies are obvious and important subjects in this Study. It stands to reason that they have much to gain by supporting new, state-of-the-art amenities in their local communities. Our team has significant experience with technology companies in the region and recognizes that there are unique characteristics of this sector when it comes to their philanthropy and corporate “citizenship.” While the Study may indeed affirm significant tech corporate interest in the Library/Community Center, it is wise for South City to cast the widest possible net for prospects in a capital campaign of this scale. That is why striking balance within a 30-plus interviewee cohort is desirable – balance in age groups, gender, neighborhood identity, and sector. An accurate assessment focuses on “major gifts.” The threshold for major gifts varies from project to project, but contributions of larger magnitude ($100,000 and greater) are a critical area of focus – achieving million-dollar multiples will require larger scale gifts. Outcomes of the interviews will, among other things, be used to build a Gifts Table from which overall campaign performance can be forecast based on reliable projections of the highest giving levels. The interviews have a collateral benefit to project fundraising – donor prospects are identified, educated and cultivated through their direct participation in the assessment process. PRG recognizes that not all interviewees understand the distinction between outside consultant and South City leader and, thus, takes seriously its responsibility as an ambassador for the project. In addition to major prospect interviews, PRG is prepared to conduct external prospect research to identify up to 50 donor prospects that may not be known who can be considered for the interview cohort, and eventual campaign. The list would consist of individuals, corporations, and foundations that have made $100,000+ contributions to similar projects in the region. This research can validate the names surfaced through an inventory of the South City’s relationships and PRG’s database, increase our pool of candidates, and enable us to select the most promising interview cohort to test the feasibility of this campaign. PRG lists external prospect research as an optional component, reflected in the Estimated Price & Terms for Services. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 10 Using a third methodology, PRG can also employ an online approach to gather data for the project at the discretion of the South City. An online survey of South City households, employers, and people from nearby communities to assess willingness to give can surface donors, especially for a municipal project. Unlike large nonprofit organizations, the South City has no longtime “donors” from which to draw prospects for its capital project. It would be unwise to assume that voter support for the sales tax measure alone equates to a willingness to make charitable contributions. But every community has library and recreation enthusiasts. Casting a wider net through digital means can surface individuals who have not yet been identified and have both interest and giving capacity. This type of survey is not online fundraising. Rather, it is an opinion sampling that gives participants an opportunity to opt-in for more information or interest in contributing to a campaign. The process and its results have collateral public relations benefits for the project and present an opportunity for South City leaders to hear from their constituencies. PRG lists online surveying as an optional component, reflected in the Estimated Price & Terms for Services. Last, as described above, PRG will conduct an internal audit of the South City’s capacity to implement and support all aspects of a $10 million fundraising campaign and make recommendations on where investments would need to be made in staffing, leadership development, and internal systems to support the campaign. A Final Report of findings and conclusions will be submitted first to the Task Force then to the appropriate officials of the South City. The report will describe how much can likely be raised, factors most likely to affect giving, donor prospects with the most promise, naming opportunities that resonate with lead donors, timing of revenues, and specific recommendations for the implementation of a campaign that will directly inform the Capital Campaign Plan developed in Phase II. Many foundations, for example, require evidence of a feasibility assessment as part of their grantmaking guidelines. As requested, during this Phase PRG can also assist with developing a short promotional video to share with prospective donors by offering recommendations on the most critical messages and images that should be conveyed through video tools. B. CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL STRATEGY AND SPECIFICS OF IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: Proposal I, Phase 2 In today’s fundraising environment, few multi-million dollar ventures are funded through a single source, such as individual donors. A thorough fiscal strategy should consider how multiple funding streams – individual gifts, foundation grants, corporate support, and government sources – could work together to achieve the objective. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 11 Using the information provided from Phase 1, PRG’s Implementation Plan will outline these relationships and offer recommendations on ways that the South City can effectively leverage donations through strategic use of challenge grants, matching gifts, and similar incentives. PRG will also offer recommendations on alternatives for raising funds should a fundraising feasibility assessment fall short of the desired goal. Larger foundations, for example, may offer Program Related Investments (PRIs) as an alternative to direct grants. Corporate and individual donors, as another example, may consider “benchmark” commitments by which they would increase their giving when a project reaches agreed-to milestones. In our experience, the key ingredients for success for any campaign are qualified, committed leaders as the “public face” of a campaign, backed by a sound, customized fundraising strategy. These are where PRG invests significant time and expertise for every client. Preparing the campaign leadership team to effectively cultivate, solicit, and steward donors is a highly customized and ongoing process in all phases of a campaign. Fundraising volunteer training will start during the study and planning phases as we work with the Task Force. By the time the campaign is ready to launch, the Task Force members who choose to join the Campaign “Cabinet” (the committee that is the driving force) will have an in-depth understanding of donor motivations and key selling points. The strategies and recommendations contained in the Implementation Plan of Phase 2 are designed to serve as the “architecture” for the campaign and will include: A Proposed Campaign Calendar Campaign Table of Organization outlining the respective roles of project leaders, campaign committee, South City staff, elected officials, volunteers, and consultants; Campaign Gifts Table, presenting the likely levels of gifts drawn from specific findings of the feasibility assessment; Suggested structure for the volunteer leadership team, including options such as a special committee of the project or an independent campaign cabinet; Recommended Sequence of Campaign Activity, including pre-campaign capacity-building measures, Leadership gifts phase(s), and a community campaign that invites giving at all levels; Delineation of Highest Priority Prospects including foundations, corporations, sponsors2, and individuals, and a strategy on how staff and volunteers can cultivate and solicit those prospects; Training and Coaching Requirements for project leaders and staff during cultivation and solicitation phases customized based on the needs of the campaign cabinet; 2 “Sponsorship” differs from gifts and grants. The sponsor receives direct benefits as agreed upon by the sponsor and recipient as a condition of the exchange. In the case of the City, such an exchange may be possible from major employers and companies focused literacy or recreational markets. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 12 Primary elements of the formal campaign Case for Support, utilizing the learning from the interviews and the “road test” of the draft campaign case Clear, coherent facts and messages that all professional and lay leaders will use to communicate about the project; Recommendations on the substance and format of written and on-line campaign materials; Recommended campaign management requirements including staff support, donor database and information systems, reporting, and use of website; Projected costs for campaign implementation. An Executive Summary of the full report will also be provided to share with interviewees and potential funders. C. CONSULTING SUPPORT FOR CAPITAL CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTATION – Proposal II, Phase 3 Many projects utilize fundraising consultants to assist with the actual execution of a capital campaign. The potential scope and function of such counsel will be identified in the Implementation Plan. If South City desires, PRG will submit a proposal for consulting support for the actual campaign but only after the study process is completed. This sequence removes any perception of consultants’ conflict of interest in creating candid, unbiased, and relevant feasibility recommendations. During implementation and to prepare leadership, PRG will create individual action plans for each major donor, training and supporting the volunteers along the way. As the campaign unfolds, we integrate donor cultivation and solicitation training into every Cabinet meeting so the information is manageable. Too much, too soon isn’t helpful. Simply put, we invest heavily in volunteer leadership and work to support their efforts every step of the way. During the implementation phase, PRG offers flexible models to help South City determine the appropriate infrastructure for this campaign. Form follows function in this regard – the specific implementation structure should be determined after the core campaign strategy is determined. For example, there may be instances where hiring staff to handle development functions might be the prudent approach, outsourcing tasks such as grant writing, prospect research, or campaign administration. PRG can offer support on any level, from full campaign management to occasional campaign counsel, and all forms in-between. We will design solutions based on the unique requirements of the South City campaign. All these options will be presented and specified at the completion of Phase 1 and 2, ensuring the right fit for the needs of this particular campaign. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 13 IV. THE CONSULTING TEAM PRG is proposing to assign an experienced consulting team to the South City’s study. Resumes of each are appended to this proposal narrative. Elliot Levin, Founder and President of PRG, will direct the study. Elliot has led PRG for 26 years and specializes in planning and fundraising for industry leading nonprofit, philanthropic, and public programs. Under his leadership, PRG has become a consulting group of choice for larger fundraising programs in the Bay Area. Melissa Irish, PRG’s Managing Associate, will serve as co-counsel. Melissa is a seasoned fundraising professional with 20-plus years of experience raising private sector funds for both local and national organizations. She brings for-profit know-how to the nonprofit community to help them achieve a competitive advantage, particularly as they embark on new fundraising paths. Stephanie Bruzzese, PRG’s research and communications specialist, brings deep experience in capital fundraising and communications, and grant writing. For nearly a decade, she was an integral part of the team that raised the funds for UCSF’s Mission Bay Campus from annual, matching, and major gifts from corporations, foundations, and individuals. Among the facilities that were successfully constructed during this campaign were Genentech Hall, Hearst Tower, Rutter Center, Sandler Neurosciences Building, Byers Hall, and Benioff Children’s Hospital. She will work closely with senior counsel to develop and test the case, conduct necessary prospect research, and create the ensuing messages and strategy for the study and plan. Additional Vendors The Helen Brown Group, Inc., https://www.helenbrowngroup.com. - We will call upon the expertise of Helen’s firm should the project require a more extensive prospect research on individual prospects or a broader wealth scan to surface the most promising individual and institutional donor prospects. UB Mobile, http://ubmobile.com - For the mobile survey described in Proposal I, Phase 1 to assess inclination to give among the South City’s residents and surrounding communities, we have already partially designed a solution with Dyna Boen, COO, which can be further refined as our needs become clearer. This PRG team has successfully worked together on feasibility assessments, capital campaigns, and fundraising capacity-building across a wide range of sectors. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 14 V. COSTS AND PROJECT TIMETABLE The detailed project work-plan and timeline are included as a separate excel document. Additionally, the costs for the services and deliverable products are included in a separate Estimated Price & Terms for Services document. Depending on when the South City makes its consultant selection and chooses to initiate the feasibility assessment and campaign planning processes, the project timeframe would comfortably fit into your overall timeframe for Phase 1 and 2, completed in October 2018. We do, however, see Phase 1 taking more than the projected 90 days due to the depth of the data collection and analysis required, and typical challenges in interviewee and committee scheduling during summer months. PRG will be available to begin the feasibility assessment process in mid-March 2018 according to your timeline, and we have reflected upon how we see the project unfolding over the ensuing six months in the appended Workplan. A standard contract would detail the payment timetable, respective responsibilities of PRG and South City, and provisions for additional services. The fee does not include standard out-of-pocket costs associated with the consultation such as travel, printing, or express delivery. Since PRG is a local firm, such expenses would likely be nominal. CONCLUDING COMMENTS The City of South San Francisco has a long and proud history and is indeed the “Birthplace of Biotechnology.” The promise embodied in the new Community Civic Campus and its Library/Community Center is a historic enhancement to community life and has the potential to open doors to new sources of financial support. Nevertheless, worthiness and need alone are rarely determinants of funding success – our communities are replete with needs and worthy projects. Successful fundraising is a product of a sound strategy, keen market understanding, a well-articulated case, high-level leadership, reliable support systems, and a commitment from all in the organization to the task. It is to these attributes that PRG dedicates its professional efforts. PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 15 VI. APPENDICES Team Resumes 1. Elliot Levin 2. Melissa Irish 3. Stephanie Bruzzese Work-plan and Timeline – Included as separate excel document attached in email Sample Capital Campaign Brochures - Included as separate documents attached in email 1. Whistlestop 2. Pacific Vision Center 3. SAY Dream Center PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 16 Elliot M. Levin, President & Founder BACKGROUND Elliot Levin is the Founder and President of the Partnership Resources Group (PRG), a consulting firm established in 1990. PRG specializes in capital fundraising and financial development for larger nonprofit and public programs. The firm is a network of fourteen professionals, each an experienced specialist from a variety of disciplines including capital development, endowments, funding feasibility assessment, planned giving, sustaining funds, bond financing, corporate philanthropy, and public sector grantmaking. Mr. Levin has developed and managed fundraising programs ranging from $500,000 to $120,000,000. An experienced problem-solver, Mr. Levin utilizes his extensive background in funds development to assist organizations with growth and the funding necessary to achieve expansion and sustainability. He is a frequent presenter and trainer for boards of directors, management teams and professional seminars. SELECT CLIENTS Bay Area Community Resources City of Antioch, CA City of Davis, CA City of San Rafael, CA County of Marin, CA County of Santa Clara, CA Denver Children’s Museum East Bay Center for the Performing Arts Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Guide Dogs for the Blind Hispanic Foundation of Silicon Valley Housing Trust of Santa Clara County Kaiser Permanente Foundation Marin Community Foundation Osher Marin JCC Pickleweed Park Comm. Center/Library San Geronimo Valley Community Center Stanford University UC Davis Medical Center UC San Francisco WORK HISTORY ♦ CEO, United Jewish Community Centers of San Francisco, Marin and the Peninsula, 1982-1990 ♦ Director, YMCA Camps of Greater Los Angeles, 1976-1981 ♦ Teacher, Chicago Public School District, 1974-1976 EDUCATION ♦ University of Illinois, BA, Education ♦ University of Southern California, Masters in Social Work (MSW) 1977 ♦ University of Southern California, Masters of Public Administration (MPA) 1978 ACADEMIC ♦ San Francisco State University, Adjunct Faculty, Graduate School of Social Welfare, 1996-2001 ♦ University of San Francisco, Adjunct Faculty, Graduate School of Nonprofit ♦ Management, 2001-2015 PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 17 Melissa A. Irish, MBA Managing Associate BACKGROUND Melissa Irish is a seasoned professional with 22 years of experience raising private sector funds for nonprofits with budgets of $250,000 to $20 million. She spent a decade as a senior fund development staffer in health and human services, workforce development and environmental organizations before completing her MBA. Following that, she established a consulting practice to serve nonprofits, from strategic planning, campaign counsel and development audits and plans, to feasibility studies for capital campaigns. Melissa specializes in creating effective individual giving programs, excelling in helping organizations build their capacity to raise major gifts. She applies innovative strategies from the for-profit arena to enhance the performance of nonprofit organizations. PARTIAL CLIENT AND PROJECT LIST Agricultural Institute of Marin Capital Campaign Feasibility Study Audubon Canyon Ranch Major Gift Campaign Episcopal Charities Development Consultation Equal Rights Advocates Business Plan and Fundraising Strategy Jewish Vocational Service Annual Fund and Major Gift Campaign, Special Event Planning and Management Justice in Aging Fundraising Plan, Interim Development Director Marin Shakespeare Company Capital Campaign Feasibility Study & Campaign Counsel North Oakland Community Charter School Capital Campaign Counsel Ploughshares Fund Major Donor Development Strategy Project Open Hand Interim VP of Development Youth Homes Capital Campaign Readiness Assessment, Annual Fund Development and Major Gifts Campaign WORK HISTORY Fundraising Consultant, 2004 – 2015 Services include: strategic planning, fundraising audits and plans, capital campaign feasibility studies, interim development director, campaign counsel for major donor and annual giving campaign, development staffing recommendations, event planning, communications strategies Director of Individual and Corporate Giving, Jewish Vocational Service (JVS), San Francisco 1998 - 2002 Associate Director of Development, Environmental Traveling Companions (ETC), San Francisco 1996 - 1998 Development Specialist, JobTrain (formerly OICW), Menlo Park, 1993 – 1996 EDUCATION Masters of Business Administration, San Francisco State University, 2004 Bachelor of Science, Health Education, San Francisco State University, 1991 PRG Proposal to the City of South San Francisco February 2018 18 Stephanie Bruzzese Research & Communications Specialist RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Freelance Fundraising Consultant, 2000 – Present Serve as fundraising consultant for organizations including San Francisco Parks Alliance, Sa Francisco Beautiful, Urban Sprouts, University of Vermont Medical Center, and University of Maryland Medical Center. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA Chief Communications Officer, Stanford Health Care and School of Medicine , 2015 – Present Lead communications for the medical school and adult clinical enterprise while guiding strategy for the Stanford Medicine master brand. Guide the development and execution of comprehensive programs in public and media relations, internal and executive communications, and brand positioning and activation. Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA Senior Director, Donor Relations, 2013 – 2015 Directed four critical programs – development communications, stewardship, prospect research, and data management – at one of the nation's foremost biomedical research institutions. Served as chief external communications officer, guiding messaging strategies for donors, partners, trustees, and volunteers. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA Senior Director, Communications and Donor Relations, 2004 – 2013 Directed three key programs – development communications, stewardship, and special events – for all schools and divisions at top-ranked university. Served as the unit's senior-most communications and marketing officer, overseeing all messaging strategies for donors, alumni, UCSF Foundation Board of Directors, and other volunteers. Engaged in regular and direct communication with top donors, facilitating over $150 million in philanthropic gifts and strengthening relationships with the university. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, Palo Alto, CA , 2001 – 2004 Development Writer Served as principal development writer, creating proposals, correspondence, reports, newsletters, brochures, and other collateral in support of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital and the pediatric programs of Stanford University School of Medicine. Wrote and edited cultivation and solicitation materials on renowned medical and scientific programs that inspired more than $18.6 million in gifts to the hospital and university. EDUCATION Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA BA, English and Comparative Literary Studies, Honors Thesis City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-113 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:6a. Resolution approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Center as part of the Community Civic Campus Project for a six month term in an amount not to exceed $76,000,and approving budget amendment 18.027. WHEREAS,on November 2,2017,and January 2,2018,the City solicited Requests for Proposals for planning and managing a capital campaign project to raise funds in support of the Community Civic Campus Project; and WHEREAS,by close of the Request for Proposals period on February 16,2018,the City received six (6) proposals; and WHEREAS,after reviewing the proposals by a committee,interviews were held for three (3)proposing consultants the week of March 5, 2018; and WHEREAS,based on the interviews,references,and qualifications submitted,it was determined that Partnership Resources Group was best-qualified based on their presentation,project understanding,experience with similar projects, and value; and WHEREAS,once the capital campaign plan is complete,City Council will determine whether to proceed with Proposal II: implementation of a multi-year fundraising campaign. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves a consulting services agreement with Partnership Resources Group for planning a capital campaign project, in an amount not to exceed $76,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve budget amendment 18.027. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the City Manager to execute a consulting services agreement for planning a capital campaign project,attached hereto as Exhibit A, in an amount not to exceed $76,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to take any other City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-113 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:6a. action consistent with the intent of this resolution that does not materially increase the City’s obligations. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 1 of 16 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND PARTNERSHIP RESOURCES GROUP THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of South San Francisco (“City”) and Partnership Resources Group (“Consultant”) (together sometimes referred to as the “Parties”) as of March 28th, 2018 (the “Effective Date”). Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, C onsultant shall provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, at the time and place and in the manner specified therein. In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date on or around April 1, 2018 and shall end on October 30, 2018, the date of completion specified in Exhibit A, and Consultant shall complete the work described in Exhibit A prior to that date, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended, as provided for in Section 8. The time provided to Consultant to complete the services requi red by this Agreement shall not affect the City’s right to terminate the Agreement, as provided for in Section 8. 1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices its profession. Consultant shall prepare all work products required by this Agreement in a substantial, first-class manner and shall conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Consultant's profession. 1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such person or persons. 1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance provided in Sections 1.1 and 1.2 above and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder. Section 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed $76,000, notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant’s proposal, attached as Exhibit A, or Consultant’s compensation schedule attached as Exhibit B, regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 2 of 16 The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for service s rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner specified herein. Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City to Consultant under this Agreement is based upon Consultant’s estimated costs of providing the services required hereunder, including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consultant. Consequently, the parties further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the costs of contributions to any pensions and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors may be eligible. City therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond compensation required under this Agreement. 2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices, not more often than once per month during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for s ervices performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information:  Serial identifications of progress bills (i.e., Progress Bill No. 1 for the first invoice, etc.);  The beginning and ending dates of the billing period;  A task summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior billings, the total due this period, the balance available under the Agreement, and the percentage of completion;  At City’s option, for each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time entries or time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and each reimbursable expense;  The amount and purpose of actual expenditures for which reimbursement is sought;  The Consultant’s signature. 2.2 Monthly Payment. City shall make monthly payments, based on invoices received, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. Cit y shall have thirty (30) days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements above to pay Consultant. City shall have no obligation to pay invoices submitted ninety (90) days past the performance of work or incurrence of cost. 2.3 Final Payment. City shall pay the last ten percent (10%) of the total sum due pursuant to this Agreement within thirty (30) days after completion of the services and submittal to City of a final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed. 2.4 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 3 of 16 incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pursuant to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement, unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly executed change order or amendment. 2.5 Hourly Fees. Fees for work performed by Consultant on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on the compensation schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. 2.6 Reimbursable Expenses. The following constitute reimbursable expenses authorized by this Agreement: printing, express delivery, mileage, food/drink. Reimbursable expenses shall not exceed $1,500.00. Expenses not listed above are not chargeable to City. Reimbursable expenses are included in the total amount of compensation provided under Section 2 of this Agreement that shall not be exceeded. 2.7 Payment of Taxes, Tax Withholding. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes. To be exempt from tax withholding, Consultant must provide City with a valid Califo rnia Franchise Tax Board form 590 (“Form 590”), as may be amended and such Form 590 shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit ____. Unless Consultant provides City with a valid Form 590 or other valid, written evidence of an exemption or waiver from withholding, City may withhold California taxes from payments to Consultant as required by law. Consultant shall obtain, and maintain on file for three (3) years after the termination of this Agreement, Form 590s (or other written evidence of exemptions or waivers) from all subcontractors. Consultant accepts sole responsibility for withholding taxes from any non-California resident subcontractor and shall submit written documentation of compliance with Consultant’s withholding duty to City upo n request. . 2.8 Payment upon Termination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8, the City shall compensate the Consultant for all outstanding costs and reimbursable expenses incurred for work satisfac torily completed as of the date of written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to that date. 2.9 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform a ny services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of authorization from the Contract Administrator. 2.10 Prevailing Wage. Where applicable, the wages to be paid for a day's work to all classes of laborers, workmen, or mechanics on the work contemplated by this Agreement, shall be not less than the prevailing rate for a day’s work in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the state where the work hereby contemplates to be performed as Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 4 of 16 determined by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to the Director’s authority under Labor Code Section 1770, et seq. Each laborer, worker or mechanic employed by Consultant or by any subcontractor shall receive the wages herein provided for. The Consultant shall pay two hundred dollars ($200), or whatever amount may be set by Labor Code Section 1775, as may be amended, per day penalty for each worker paid less than prevailing rate of per diem wages. The difference between the prevailing rate of per diem wages and the wage paid to each worker shall be paid by the Consultant to each worker. An error on the part of an awarding body does not relieve the Consultant from responsibility for payment of the prevailing rate of per diem wages and penalties pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770 1775. The City will not recognize any claim for additional compensation because of the payment by the Consultant for any wage rate in excess of prevailing wage rate set forth. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant. a. Posting of Schedule of Prevailing Wage Rates and Deductions. If the schedule of prevailing wage rates is not attached hereto pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, the Consultant shall post at appropriate conspicuous points at the site of the project a schedule showing all determined prevailing wage rates for the various classes of laborers and mechanics to be engaged in work on the project under this contract and all deductions, if any, required by law to be made from unpaid wages actually earned by the laborers and mechanics so engaged. b. Payroll Records. Each Consultant and subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by the Consultant in connection with the public work. Such records shall be certified and submitted weekly as required by Labor Code Section 1776.” Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein. City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of the City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long -distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities. Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the typ es and amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 5 of 16 arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Consultant shall provide Certificates of Insurance, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, indicating that Consultant has obtained or currently maintains insurance that meets the requiremen ts of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory, in all respects, to the City. Consultant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's bid. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until Consultant has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s). 4.1 Workers’ Compensation. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by Consultant. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall b e provided with limits of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident. In the alternative, Consultant may rely on a self-insurance program to meet those requirements, but only if the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the Contract Administrator (as defined in Section 10.9). The insurer, if insurance is provided, or the Consultant, if a program of self- insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement. 4.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. 4.2.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is u sed, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting there from, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non - owned automobiles. 4.2.2 Minimum scope of coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 or GL 0002 (most recent editions) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. Automobile coverage shall be at least as Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 6 of 16 broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 8 and 9. No endorsement shall be attached limiting the coverage. 4.2.3 Additional requirements. Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as a certified endorsement to the policy: a. The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claims-made basis. b. Any failure of Consultant to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. 4.3 Professional Liability Insurance. 4.3.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) covering the licensed professionals’ errors and omissions. Any deductible or self -insured retention shall not exceed ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS $150,000 per claim. 4.3.2 Claims-made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverage is written on a claims-made form: a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement. b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates. c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of this Agreement, Consultant must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work. The City shall have the right to exercise, at the Consultant’s sole cost and expense, any extended reporting provisions of the policy, if the Consultant cancels or does not renew the coverage. d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement. 4.4 All Policies Requirements. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 7 of 16 4.4.1 Acceptability of insurers. All insurance required by this section is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. 4.4.2 Verification of coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with complete copies of all policies delivered to Consultant by the insurer, including complete copies of all endorsements attached to those policies. All copies of policies and certified endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. If the City does not receive the required insurance documents prior to the Consultant beginning work, it shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete copies of all required insurance policies at any time. 4.4.3 Notice of Reduction in or Cancellation of Coverage. A certified endorsement shall be attached to all insurance obtained pursuant to this Agreement stating that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. In the event that any coverage required by this section is reduced, limited, cancelled, or materially affected in any other manner, Consultant shall provide written notice to City at Consultant’s earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than ten (10) working days after Consultant is notified of the change in coverage. 4.4.4 Additional insured; primary insurance. City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant, including the insured’s general supervision of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, as applicable; premises owned, occupied, or used by Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by the Consultant in the course of providing services pursuant to this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. A certified endorsement must be attached to all policies stating that coverage is primary insurance with respect to the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage. 4.4.5 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall disclose to and obtain the approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. Further, if the Consultant’s insurance policy includes a self-insured retention that must be paid by a named insured as a precondition of the insurer’s liability, or which has the effect of providing that payments of the self-insured retention by others, including additional insureds or insurers do not serve to satisfy the s elf- Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 8 of 16 insured retention, such provisions must be modified by special endorsement so as to not apply to the additional insured coverage required by this agreement so as to not prevent any of the parties to this agreement from satisfying or paying the self - insured retention required to be paid as a precondition to the insurer’s liability. Additionally, the certificates of insurance must note whether the policy does or does not include any self-insured retention and also must disclose the deductible. During the period covered by this Agreement, only upon the prior express written authorization of Contract Administrator, Consultant may increase such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The Contract Administrator may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self-insured retention levels with a requirement that Consultant procure a bond, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them. 4.4.6 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 4.4.7 Wasting Policy. No insurance policy required by Section 4 shall include a “wasting” policy limit. 4.4.8 Variation. The City may approve a variation in the foregoing insurance requirements, upon a determination that the coverage, scope, limits, and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available, or that the City’s interests are otherwise fully protected. 4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the f ollowing remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Consultant’s breach: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement; b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or c. Terminate this Agreement. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 9 of 16 Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the City, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises wholly from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Co nsultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Section 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. 6.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subparagraph 1.3; however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 10 of 16 6.2 Consultant No Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent or to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. Section 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. 7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement. 7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the work hereunder. 7.3 Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals, including from City, of what -so-ever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing, Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement valid Business Licenses from City. 7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required of Consultant thereby. Consultant shall include the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by the Contract Administrator or this Agreement. Section 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 11 of 16 8.1 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written notification to Consultant. Consultant may cancel this Agreement for cause upon 30 days’ written notice to City and shall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed to the date of notice of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City all materials described in Se ction 9.1. 8.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1.1. Any such extension shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred during the extension period. 8.3 Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the parties. 8.4 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial in ducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 8.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8.6 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 8.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement; 8.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement; Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 12 of 16 8.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not finished by Consultant; or 8.6.4 Charge Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had completed the work. Section 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS. 9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and Consultant agree that, until final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports and other documents are confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both parties unless required by law. 9.2 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement. 9.3 Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that Section 9.2 of this Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit, and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), the Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement. 9.4 Records Submitted in Response to an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposals. All responses to a Request for Proposals (RFP) or invitation to bid issued by the City become the exclusive property of the City. At such time as the City selects a bid, all proposals received become a matter of public record, and shall be regarded as public records, with the exception of those elements in each proposal that are defined by Consultant and plainly marked as “Confidential,” "Business Secret" or “Trade Secret." Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 13 of 16 The City shall not be liable or in any way responsible for the disclosure of any such proposal or portions thereof, if Consultant has not plainly marked it as a "Trade Secret" or "Business Secret," or if disclosure is required under the Public Records Act. Although the California Public Records Act recognizes that certain confidential trade secret information may be protected from disclosure, the City may not be in a position to establish that the information that a prospective bidder submits is a trade secret. If a request is made for information marked "Trade Secret" or "Business Secret," and the requester takes legal action seeking release of the materials it believes does not constitute trade secret information, by submitting a proposal, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents and employees, from any judgment, fines, penalties, and award of attorneys fees awarded against the City in favor of the party requesting the information, and any and all costs connected with tha t defense. This obligation to indemnify survives the City's award of the contract. Consultant agrees that this indemnification survives as long as the trade secret information is in the City's possession, which includes a minimum retention period for such documents. Section 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including arbitration or an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 10.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County San Mateo or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 10.3 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. T he invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. 10.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement. 10.5 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 14 of 16 10.6 Use of Recycled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper. 10.7 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place Consultant in a “conflict of interest,” as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act, codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq. Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve (12) months , Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et.seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any sums paid to the Consultant. Consultant understands that, in addition to th e foregoing, it may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of Government Code § 1090 and, if applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the State of California. 10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials. City agrees that Consultant will not at any time solicit funds, assets or property for charitable purposes or employ, procure or engage any compensated person to solicit, receive or control funds, assets or property for charitable purposes. 10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Deborah Gill, Special Projects Manager ("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee. 10.10 Notices. All notices and other communications which are required or may be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given (i) when received if personally delivered; (ii) when received if transmitted by telecopy, if received during normal business hours on a business day (or if not, the next business day after delivery) provided that such facsimile is legible and that at the time such facsimile is sent the sending Party receives written confirmation of receipt; (iii) if sent for next day delivery to a domestic address by recognized overnight delivery service (e.g., Federal Express); and (iv) upon receipt, if sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. In each case notice shall be sent to the respective Parties as follows: Consultant Elliot M. Levin, President Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 15 of 16 Partnership Resources Group 838 Mission Ave. San Rafael, CA 94901 City: City Clerk City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 10.11 Professional Seal. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator, the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professional responsible for the report/design preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled "Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility," as in the following example. Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility. 10.12 Integration. This Agreement, including all Exhibits attached hereto, and incorporated herein, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral pertaining to the matters herein. 10.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and/or by facsimile or other electronic means, and when each Party has signed and delivered at least one such counterpart, each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and, when taken together with other signed counterpart, shall constitute one Agreement, which shall be binding upon and effective as to all Parties.. 10.14 Construction. The headings in this Agreement are for the purpose of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect any of the terms of this Agreement. The parties have had an equal opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement; therefore any construction as against the drafting party shall not apply to this Agreement. The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:11.14.2016] March 28, 2018 City of South San Francisco and Partnership Resources Group Page 16 of 16 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Consultants ____________________________ _____________________________________ City Manager NAME: TITLE: Attest: _____________________________ City Clerk Approved as to Form: ____________________________ City Attorney 2729962.1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES PRG will conduct the overall consultation in concert with a Capital Fundraising Planning Task Force of 5 -7 individuals that would include the key South City staff, Library Foundation Board members, individuals from the “Friends” groups for the Library and Parks and Recreation, select Council members(s), and leaders from the local community. The Task Force’s involvement is important t o the eventual implementation of a large-scale fund development program as it may form the nucleus of a campaign leadership team. As a group, the Task Force provides knowledge of South City and the facts about the community center project while serving as a sounding board for the consultants. This group is also the bridge between the work of the consultants and the entities responsible for implementation. PRG proposes a series of deliverable items per the objectives: A. CAMPAIGN PLANNING STUDY – Phase I PRG will design and conduct a study to provide South City with data relevant to two fundamental questions on how or even whether to launch a major fundraising effort:  Under what conditions will individuals of wealth, businesses, and funding institutions support the initiative? and;  What specific levels of financial support will most likely ensue if these conditions are satisfied? Criteria for Measuring Feasibility The Assessment will test for the presence and strength of five elements essential in achieving larger-scale fundraising success: 1. Strength of the Case Working in conjunction with the Task Force, PRG will use our skilled writing team to draft a campaign “Case Statement” specific to the potential funding market and, thereafter, test its effectiveness with select major donor prospects and individuals who are influential in South City and the general service area. The Case draft will also include proposed naming rights opportunities to test how they may influence interest and giving, and the results will be folded into the campaign strategy to guide solicitation of select prospects. 2. Depth of the Prospect Pool There must be a sufficient number of potential donors in the prospect pool from which to draw a qualified group of donors with the capacity to give $100K or more. The size of this prospect base is a quantifiable indicator of fundraising feasibility. Access to these individuals is likewise a key determinant. A blend of corporate, foundation, and individual donors will be required to get an accurate gauge on true, aggregate giving potential. PRG will leverage the networks of the Task Force members to indentif y and access the interview cohort. 3. Available Leadership Campaign feasibility is closely linked to the availability of credible, committed volunteer leaders who are prepared not only to make their own substantial financial commitments but also to ask oth ers to participate financially. The Assessment will measure both the number of individuals who might lead the campaign as well as South City’s ability to access and recruit them. 4. Timing PRG will assess the effect of potentially competing fundraising forc es in the study area by evaluating other campaigns now underway or in the planning stages. 5. Organizational Readiness Conducting a $10 million campaign will require the efficient and robust functioning of campaign systems, donor records, communications, and project leadership that inspires confidence. PRG will “audit” the South City’s internal capability to manage and support a large-scale campaign or alternative administrative approaches. This review typically includes staffing capabilities and availability, data management system(s), and general readiness to absorb the internal administrative functions necessary in any campaign. The audit is not an evaluation of South City staff or systems. Rather, it identifies what exists and what enhancements may be necessary to support a capital campaign. Methodologies PRG will draw on a variety of methods to gather data appropriate to measure campaign feasibility. The first and primary approach is a series of confidential, one -on-one interviews with up to 30 individuals selected because they have the financial capacity to make a “leadership gift” or have substantial access to such individuals or funding organizations. In our experience, this is the minimum sample size from which to draw reliable measurements for a $10 million study. The consultants will conduct the interviews using a questionnaire developed specifically for this assessment that will ensure consistency and comparability across all interviews. The quality of the data and the integrity of the process rely on the confidentiality of the interviews. All findings, therefore, will be reported without attribution unless otherwise specified by the respondent. PRG recommends choosing a diverse interview cohort for the assessment that would include known supporters of South City programs/services, South City residents assumed to possess high -giving capacity, senior management of technology companies, leaders from the business community at -large, foundation executives, elected officials, and others of influence. PRG will augment the cohort with names from our in- house prospect files that may hold promise as donors or campaign leaders. While the Study may indeed affirm significant tech corporate interest in the Community Center, it is wise for South City to cast the widest possible net for prospects in a capital campaign of this scale. That is why striking balance within up to a 30-interviewee cohort is desirable – balance in age groups, gender, neighborhood identity, and sector. An accurate assessment focuses on “major gifts.” The threshold for major gifts varies from project to project, but contributions of larger magnitude ($100,000 and greater) are a critical area of focus – achieving million-dollar multiples will require larger scale gifts. Outcomes of the interviews will, among other things, be used to build a Gifts Table from which overall campaign performance can be forecast based on reliable projections of the highest giving levels. In addition to major prospect interviews, PRG will conduct external prospect research to identify up to 50 donor prospects that may not be known who can be considered for the interview cohort, and eventual campaign. The list would consist of individuals, corporations, and foundations that have made $100,000+ contributions to similar projects in the region and will be provided on a spread sheet that includes the name, contact, prior giving to “like” projects. This research can validate the names surfaced thr ough an inventory of the South City’s relationships and PRG’s database, increase our pool of candidates, and enable us to select the most promising interview cohort to test the feasibility of this campaign. If a full profile is required for any of these prospects, PRG can produce for an additional fee. A Final Report of findings and conclusions will be submitted first to the Task Force then to the appropriate officials of the South City. The report will describe how much can likely be raised, factors most likely to affect giving, donor prospects with the most promise, naming opportunities that resonate with lead donors, timing of revenues, and specific recommendations for the implementation of a campaign that will directly inform the Capital Campaign Plan developed in Phase II. As requested, during this Phase PRG can also provide input on a short promotional video developed by the library staff to share with prospective donors by offering recommendations on the most critical messages and images that should be conveyed through video tools B. CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Phase II In today’s fundraising environment, few multi-million dollar ventures are funded through a single source, such as individual donors. A thorough fiscal strategy should consider how multiple funding streams – individual gifts, foundation grants, corporate support, and government sources – could work together to achieve the objective. Using the information provided from the Final Report in Phase 1, PRG’s Capital Implementation Plan will outline these relationships and offer recommendations on ways that the South City can effectively leverage donations through strategic use of challenge grants, matching gifts, and similar incentives. PRG will also offer recommendations on alternatives for raising funds should a fundraising feasibility assessment fall short of the desired goal. The Capital Implementation Plan will also include:  A Proposed Campaign Calendar  Campaign Table of Organization outlining the respective roles of project leaders, campaign committee, South City staff, elected officials, volunteers, and consultants;  Campaign Gifts Table, presenting the likely levels of gifts drawn from specific findings of the feasibility assessment;  Suggested structure for the volunteer leadership team, including options such as a special committee of the project or an independent campaign cabinet;  Recommended Sequence of Campaign Activity, including pre-campaign capacity-building measures, Leadership gifts phase(s), and a community campaign that invites giving at all levels;  Delineation of Highest Priority Prospects including foundations, corporations, sponsors1, and individuals, and a strategy on how staff and volunteers can cultivate and solicit those prospects;  Training and Coaching Requirements for project leaders and staff during cultivation and solicitation phases customized based on the needs of the campaign cabinet;  Primary elements of the formal campaign Case for Support, utilizing the learning from the interviews and the “road test” of the draft campaign case  Clear, coherent facts and messages that all professional and lay leaders will use to communicate about the project;  Recommendations on the substance and format of written and on-line campaign materials;  Recommended campaign management requirements including staff support, donor database and information systems, reporting, and use of website;  Projected costs for campaign implementation. An Executive Summary of the full report will also be provided to share with interviewees and potential funders. Meeting Schedule Early April, PRG would like to hold a Getting Started Meeting with Deborah Gill and the City Manager to clarify the overall deliverables, timeline and roles of the project, and identify the possible Task Force members and how they will be recruited to the project. Following the above meeting, PRG requests five meetings with the Task Force to ensure appropriate knowledge transfer and engagement by the client. These meetings would start in April, and continuing through October 2018. The anticipated schedule and focus of these meetings are as follows , with up to three additional group meetings as needed :  Mtg #1 - Project Kick-Off and Overview of Roles, Timeline and Deliverables, Identify Additional Task Force members to recruit, Initial Brainstorm of the Case and Interview Cohort – April  Mtg #2 - Approve DRAFT Case and Interview Cohort List, Brainstorm Additional Interviewees, Review Process for Setting up Interviews- May  Mtg #3 - Review and Discuss Interim Findings, and Identify Additional Interview Cohorts with the City and Library Foundation Board representative(s) July/August  Mtg #4 - Present draft Study Report and Discuss Recommendations – September  Mtg #5 - Present and Discuss Draft Implementation Plan to City Council –October Additionally, and as requested, PRG will meet with the City Manager monthly to discuss progress and ensure the City Manager’s engagement in Phases I and II, and attend the quarterly Library foundation board meetings and provide an update. General Sequence of Deliverables (subject to ongoing refinement with the Project Task Force)  Develop researched listing of Top 50 prospects – April/May  Case for Support – first draft - early May  Case for Support – approved for use in interviews – late May  Interviews Begin – June 1  Internal Review of City fundraising administrative capacity – August  Interim Report- August  Interviews conclude (preliminary) early September  Phase I Final Report to Task Force - September  Begin Phase II – Financial Strategy and Implementation Planning - September  Complete and Deliver Implementation Plan - October A detailed project workplan will be developed and submitted to the City followin g the initial meeting of the task force. All meetings and deliverables are projected to be complete by October 30, 201 8. EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION SCHEDULE Per the Scope of Work (Exhibit A) an in accordance with the fixed -fee structure of compensation to the Consultant for the six month period of the consultation beginning on or around April 1, 2018, the schedule of compensation shall be:  $11,175 – paid at the initiation of the consultation, on or around April 1, 2018  $11,175 – paid on May 1, 2018  $11,175 – paid on June 1, 2018  $11,175 – paid on July 1, 2018  $11,175 – paid on August 1, 2018  $11,175 – paid on September 1, 2018  $ 7,450 – paid on October 30, 2018, 10% of the total fee per Section 2.3 of this Agreement Should the consultation conclude prior to October 30, 2018, City agrees to pay the balance due upon completion as billed by the Consultant. Reimbursement for automobile travel shall be made at the rate of $.54 per mile. All other reimbursable expenses will be billed by Consultant at direct cost. EXHIBIT C INSURANCE CERTIFICATES Attached in email. City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-153 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:7. Report regarding a resolution approving an amendment to the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs to provide national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500,in a total not to exceed amount of $129,500,and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the current letter of engagement.(Mike Futrell, City Manager) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs to provide continued national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500,in a total not to exceed amount of $129,500,and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the current letter of engagement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In April,2017,the City Manager signed an engagement agreement for $60,000,plus up to $74,000 including expenses,with the firm Squire Patton Boggs for the purpose of engaging a federal government relations advocate to assist the City on pending and future federal issues.Please see attachment 1 for the April 2017 engagement letter, and attachment 2 for a profile of Squire Patton Boggs. The April 2017 engagement agreement called for Squire Patton Boggs to advise and represent the City with respect to specific federal public policy matters in Congress and the Executive Branch related to the following matters:authorizing and funding a study of sea level rise and monitoring;potentially assisting with obtaining funding for Caltrain electrification;and assist with securing additional funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant program, if possible. Since engagement, Squire Patton Boggs has regularly interacted with staff, summarized as follows: ·Provides technical assistance and advocacy as the City develops an agreement with the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)relative to sea level rise;a memorandum of understanding (MOU)has been developed and is pending in Washington D.C.for final approval;the City’s sea level rise project has been submitted by USACE to Congress for inclusion in the next Water Resources Development Act (WRDA);and an accompanying funding request is being processed by Squire Patton Boggs for submission. ·Regularly provides staff with notice of federal grant funding opportunities with key deadlines and summaries. ·Provides summaries of new federal bills and important federal policy positions,including analyses of the 2017 Tax Bill (including new Opportunity Zones,)President Trump’s Infrastructure Plan, Congressional budgets, and the State of the Union address. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-153 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:7. ·Provides advice and research as necessary on federal issues. The full $60,000 has been expended,with minimal additional expenses incurred.Given the pending sea level rise work,the potential for influencing the pending infrastructure bill,potential work on a Federal Trade Zone Subzone,New Market Tax Credits and many other federal issues in times of rapid change at the federal level, staff recommends extending the engagement with Squire Patton Boggs until June 30, 2018. In advance of June 2018,staff will determine whether it is advisable to extend the contract an additional year until June 30, 2019, or whether issuing a request for proposals (RFP) for these services is warranted. FISCAL IMPACT Squire Patton Boggs charges a flat rate of $7,500 per month,requiring a total not to exceed amount of $55,500 including expenses through June 30,2018.Funding for this agreement would come from the City’s Fiscal Year 2017-18 General Fund. CONCLUSION Squire Patton Boggs has proven itself a reliable and effective federal partner with the City.Approval of the resolution will allow a continued engagement with Squire Patton Boggs concerning all federal issues impacting the City of South San Francisco. Attachment 1 - Squire Patton Boggs Engagement Letter 2017 Attachment 2 - Squire Patton Boggs Profile City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-154 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:7a. Resolution approving an amendment to the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs to provide national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500,in a total not to exceed amount of $129,500, and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the current letter of engagement. WHEREAS,the City Manager signed a letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs for national advocacy and policy advisory services in April 2017 for $60,000, plus up to $74,000 including expenses, for 2017; and WHEREAS,a second letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs would enable delivery of their services until June 30,2018,at which time staff will examine whether to extend the engagement for one more year until June 30, 2019 or if a Request for Proposals should be issued; and WHEREAS,funding for the engagement letter with Squire Patton Boggs is included as an assumption in the in the City of South San Francisco’s General Fund Non-Departmental operating budget for Fiscal Year (FY)2017- 18. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves amending the letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs for national advocacy and policy advisory services for an additional $55,500, with a total amount not to exceed $129,500. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the City Manager to execute an amended letter of engagement with Squire Patton Boggs for national advocacy and policy advisory services, attached hereto as Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to take any other action consistent with the intent of this resolution that does not materially increase the City’s obligations. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-257 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:8. Motion to approve the Minutes from the meeting of March 14, 2018. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-244 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:9. Motion confirming payment registers for March 28, 2018.(Richard Lee, Director of Finance) The payments shown in the attached payment register are accurate and sufficient funds were available for payment (payroll items excluded). Attachment: Payment Register City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Payment Listing by Department for City Council Review Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION CITY CLERK CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 3/7/2018 2657025010121043 E 100-02110-5020 82.00 CITY HALL - FIRST AID CABINET SUPPLY CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION OF CA 3/14/2018 265994CC367044 E 100-02110-5032 395.00 GR-2018 CCAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE 4/17/18 TO CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN3/14/2018 265899RS2954307 E 100-02110-5001 778.54 RECORD STORAGE FROM 01/1/18 THROUGH 01/ 3/14/2018 265899RS2961991 E 100-02110-5001 651.43 RECORD STORAGE FROM 02/1/18 THROUGH 02/ DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 3/14/2018 265905B3094602 E 100-02110-5024 100.00 ORD SUMMARY - PARKLAND ACQUISITION FEE P 3/14/2018 265905B3096628 E 100-02110-5024 69.30 ORD SUMMARY - CANABIS PRE - ADOPT 3/14/2018 265905B3100828 E 100-02110-5024 67.10 NOTICE OF PH SUMMERHILL APARTMENT 3/14/2018 265905B3100834 E 100-02110-5024 66.00 NOTICE OF PH DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CORE DTC 3/14/2018 265905B3101962 E 100-02110-5024 73.70 ORD SUMMARY - CANABIS POST - ADOPT LISA MICHELLE POPE 3/9/2018 265851180225 E 100-02110-5025 93.75 TRANSCRIPTION SVCS: 02/07/18 MEASURE W CO 3/14/2018 265952180223 E 100-02110-5024 281.25 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY 14, 201 3/14/2018 265952180305 E 100-02110-5024 250.00 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 201 NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-02110-5027 9.46 STANDARD MAINTENANCE QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 3/14/2018 2659552018-56 E 100-02110-5025 2,128.06 MUNI CODE SUPPLEMENT 57 ORD. 1548-2017 USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-02110-5027 0.83 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-02110-5071 279.54 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for CITY CLERK $5,325.96 CITY COUNCIL AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/14/2018 265994cc367284 E 100-01110-5045 7.99 TB - OFFICE SUPPLIES & COUNCIL PHONE CHARGE AMOURA 3/9/2018 265866cc366638 E 100-01110-5031 59.00 HE/CC -- DINNERS FOR COUNCIL MTG FOR THREE BIG BELLY DELI 3/9/2018 265866cc366632 E 100-01110-5031 59.90 HE/CC -- DINNERS FOR COUNCIL MTG FOR 5 CITY OF BRISBANE 3/7/2018 265703022318 E 100-01110-5031 100.00 LN, KM -- COUNCIL OF CITIES DINNER MEETING 2 GRAND PALACE RESTAURANT 3/9/2018 265866cc366663 E 100-01110-5031 50.20 HE/CC -- DINNERS FOR COUNCIL MTG FOR FOUR LARKSPUR LANDING 3/14/2018 265994cc366616 E 100-01110-5021 75.00 KM/CC -- SPUR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2018 NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-01110-5027 5.37 STANDARD MAINTENANCE RICHARD GARBARINO 3/7/2018 265725022318 E 100-01110-5031 22.55 RG -- EXP REIMBURSEMENT LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 3/7/2018 265725030118 E 100-01110-5031 102.46 RG -- EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE--F STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-01110-5020 56.22 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 1 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco CITY COUNCIL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-01110-5020 20.91 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-01110-5020 300.01 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-01110-5020 45.02 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-01110-5020 25.38 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES TORRES FLOWERS 3/9/2018 265866cc366783 E 100-01110-5031 54.36 SB/CC FOR LN -- FLORAL PRESENTED NATL UNIF A UC HASTINGS PARKING GARAGE 3/14/2018 265994cc366937 E 100-01110-5031 18.00 ML/CC FOR MF: PARKING AT BCDC MTG USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-01110-5027 0.47 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-01110-5071 275.51 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 WHITE ELEPHANT 3/9/2018 265866cc366642 E 100-01110-5031 59.81 HE/CC -- DINNERS FOR COUNCIL MTG FOR FIVE Payments issued for CITY COUNCIL $1,338.16 CITY MANAGER 15FIVE 3/7/2018 265796cc366555 E 100-05110-5021 35.40 MF/CC -- 15FIVE SUBSCRIPTION FOR FEB 2018 ADOBE SYSTEMS 3/7/2018 265796cc366549 E 100-05110-5005 69.99 MF/CC -- ADOBE SYSTEMS PDF PACK SUBSCRIPTI CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 3/7/2018 2657025010121043 E 100-05110-5001 82.00 CITY HALL - FIRST AID CABINET SUPPLY DEBORAH GILL 3/7/2018 265727022818 E 100-05110-5005 66.00 DG -- EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2018 3/7/2018 265727022818 E 100-05110-5031 127.63 DG -- EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2018 EVENTBRITE 3/9/2018 265866cc366788 E 100-05110-5030 123.47 ML/CC 2018 SUSTAINABILITY AWARDS EVENT, SA FAIRMONT HOTEL 3/14/2018 265994cc366939 E 100-05110-5031 62.00 ML/CC PARKING FEE AT EXEC TEAM RETREAT GOLDEN GATEWAY GARAGE 3/14/2018 265994cc366938 E 100-05110-5031 13.50 ML/CC PARKING FEE AT SMITH GROUP MTG MARRIOTT HOTELS 3/7/2018 265796cc366578 E 100-05110-5032 924.83 MF/CC LODGING FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CONF MICROSOFT STORE 3/7/2018 265796cc366547 E 100-05110-5005 69.99 MF/CC -- MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 YEARLY SUBSCR MMANC 3/9/2018 265866cc366639 E 100-05110-5032 100.00 HE/CC -- MMANC 2018 WINTER FORUM REGISTR 3/9/2018 265866cc366761 E 100-05110-5031 175.00 SB/CC -- MMANC 2018 WINTER FORUM & MEMB NEWSLIBRARY.COM 3/7/2018 265796cc366286 E 100-05110-5022 995.00 MF/CC -- PUBLICATIONS FROM NEWSLIBRARY.CO NNA*SERVICES LLC 3/9/2018 265866cc366785 E 100-05110-5033 887.39 ML/CC FOR HE ONE-DAY NOTARY CLASS FOR CA PAPER MART 3/9/2018 265866cc366764 E 100-05120-5030 128.19 SB/CC -- SUPPLIES FOR COOKIE PACKAGING EVEN SAFEWAY STORE 3/9/2018 265866cc366766 E 100-05110-5030 492.00 SB/CC -- SUPPLIES FOR 2017 HOLIDAY COOKIE PK SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES 3/7/2018 265796cc366553 E 100-05110-5021 275.00 MF/CC -- 3 YEAR SUBSCRIPT SSF BUSINESS TIMES SSF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3/9/2018 265866cc366662 E 100-05110-5031 150.00 HE/CC -- SSF CHAMBER DINNER EVENT FOR TWO STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679702E 100-05110-5020 -262.19 RETURNED ITEM -- CREDIT FOR CMO OFFICE SUP 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 56.23 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 2 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco CITY MANAGER STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 20.52 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 300.02 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 10.15 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 9.82 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 4.03 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 46.03 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579508/3679790E 100-05110-5020 26.38 CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA 3/9/2018 265867114-6205541 E 100-05110-5005 490.06 PORTAPOTTIES 2017 HOLIDAY FOOD&TOY DRIVE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-05110-5071 947.36 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for CITY MANAGER $6,425.80 COMMUNICATIONS INC ESSENCE PRINTING 3/7/2018 265718129789 E 100-05130-5025 1,922.80 LA -PRINTING OF SSF NEWSLETTER IN CHINESE & POSTMASTER- LINDEN OFFICE 3/16/2018 266039PERMIT #138 E 100-05130-5027 4,700.00 POSTAGE - CITYWIDE POSTCARD MAILING PROCLAIM PROMOTIONS, INC 3/7/2018 26576637002 E 100-05130-5030 744.69 LA-SPRING EVENTS BREEZEWAY BANNER Payments issued for COMMUNICATIONS $7,367.49 CITY TREASURER CHANDLER ASSET MGMT, INC 3/7/2018 2657011802SOSF E 100-03110-5001 6,901.69 FEB 2018 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMEN Payments issued for CITY TREASURER $6,901.69 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4LEAF INC. 3/7/2018 265675J0596-18A E 100-10520-5005 900.00 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 01/01-01/31/1 3/7/2018 265675J3523F E 100-10520-5005 17,991.65 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES HIX 01/01-01/31 ALLISON KNAPP WOLLAM 3/7/2018 2657413-2018 E 270-10413-5005 9,528.75 GENESIS IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTING SVCS 2 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 3/7/2018 2657025010121043 E 100-10110-5020 81.98 CITY HALL - FIRST AID CABINET SUPPLY CORA 3/7/2018 2657076482 E 222-10350-5063 1,981.77 FY 17-18 CDBG GRANTEE CORA CSG CONSULTANTS INC 3/14/2018 26590216486 E 100-10520-5005 1,955.00 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES GENENTECH 201 3/14/2018 26590216487 E 100-10520-5005 5,950.00 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES GENENTECH 201 3/14/2018 26590216691 E 100-10520-5005 170.00 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES GENENTECH 20 3/14/2018 265902B180104 E 100-10520-5005 40,819.56 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES REGULAR 01/0 3/14/2018 265902B180105 E 100-10520-5005 1,922.31 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES EXPEDITED 01/ Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 3 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CSG CONSULTANTS INC 3/14/2018 265902B180106 E 100-10520-5005 990.00 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES GENENTECH E 3/14/2018 265902B180107 E 100-10520-5005 9,842.03 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES GENENTECH R ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS IN3/14/2018 265910171122-2 E 100-10110-5005 1,375.00 FY 15-16 ECONOMIC PLANNING SYSTEMS -ECON ELIZA MANCHESTER 3/14/2018 2659331/29/18-3/8/18 E 100-10110-5031 82.37 STATEMENT OF EXPENSE-TRANSPORTATION ERNESTO LUCERO 3/14/2018 2659311/18/18-2/9/18 E 100-10115-5031 60.49 STMT OF EXP-FOOD SHOW/MTGS PARKING,MILE 3/14/2018 2659312/20/18-2/24/18 E 100-10110-5032 648.28 STMT OF EXP- IEDC CERTIFICATION 3/14/2018 2659313/7/18-3/8/18 E 100-10110-5032 185.67 STMT OF EXP - ICSC CONF/MONTEREY FEDEX 3/7/2018 2657216-098-04130 E 100-10410-5020 94.58 DRB PACKETS FEBRUARY 2018 3/14/2018 2659136-091-00051 E 100-10110-5020 57.73 FED EX SERVICE - DT GATEWAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC 3/14/2018 265918RD 2540234 E 100-10110-5021 715.19 559 GATEWAY - CHILD CARE PROP OWNER ASSO 3/14/2018 265918RD 2548738 E 100-10110-5021 715.19 559 GRATEWAY CHILD CARE - MONTHLY OWNER' GREEN TECHNOLOGY REGISTRATION 3/7/2018 265796CC366529 E 100-10520-5022 45.00 PP- REGULATION CODE BOOK (EVC) HIP HOUSING INC. 3/16/2018 2660306519 E 222-10350-5063 3,425.39 FY 17-18 CDBG GRANTEE HIP HOUSING KITCHELL CEM 3/7/2018 26574075843 E 100-10410-5005 6,045.00 CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION SERVICES FOR 1 3/7/2018 26574076934 E 100-10410-5005 5,500.00 CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION SERVICES FOR 1 LAMPHIER-GREGORY 3/9/2018 26584111063 E 100-10410-5005 1,050.00 BILLBOARD RELOCATION AT 180 S AIRPORT THRO LESLIE ARROYO 3/14/2018 265881030718 E 100-10110-5030 395.60 LA -- EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FLIGHT TO BIO 2 MILT'S SIGN SERVICE INC 3/7/2018 26575311838 E 100-10410-5020 110.01 NAMEPLATE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION - M.E NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-10110-5027 5.21 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-10410-5027 29.91 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-10520-5027 3.37 STANDARD MAINTENANCE NICK'S RESTAURANT 3/14/2018 265994CC367229 E 100-10520-5033 252.84 PP- TEAM BUILDING RETREAT LUNCH -BUILDING OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/14/2018 265946105653450001 E 100-10110-5020 36.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES (88PP) 3/14/2018 265946108333676001 E 100-10110-5020 30.55 OFFIE SUPPLY 3/14/2018 265946108334279001 E 100-10110-5020 22.17 OFFICE SUPPLY ROZALYNNE THOMPSON 3/7/2018 2657931/25/18 E 100-10410-5031 15.42 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE TO ADU PERMIT 3/7/2018 26579310/13/2017 E 100-10410-5031 24.56 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE TO BAPDA - R. T 3/7/2018 2657932/9/2018 E 100-10410-5031 43.06 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE TO STATE OF TH RYAN WASSUM 3/7/2018 2658052/26/2018 E 100-10410-5031 37.49 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE TO GRAND BLVD SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES 3/14/2018 26596410095059 E 100-10110-5035 10,000.00 SF BUSINESS TIMES ADD: WOMEN WHO LEAD PA 3/14/2018 2659653180904 E 100-10110-5031 262.50 SF BUSINESS TIMES RENEWAL FOR 3 YRS 18-21 SSF SCAVENGER CO INC 3/9/2018 2658610000664521 E 100-10410-5051 10.00 SHREDDING OF DOCUMENTS Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 4 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048519402 E 100-10410-5020 140.48 PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658628048579382 E 100-10520-5020 229.26 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-10110-5027 0.46 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-10410-5027 2.63 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-10520-5027 0.30 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10115-5071 180.31 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10520-5071 520.18 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10410-5071 212.13 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10110-5071 140.49 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10110-5045 150.86 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-10411-5071 70.14 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 WESCO GRAPHICS, INC 3/14/2018 26600443837 E 100-10110-5025 712.87 SF STATE MBA PROGRAM - POSTCARDS PRINTING WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS 3/7/2018 265806I-410-218-01-01 E 100-10520-5005 46,251.15 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FIRE/LIFE SAFE 3/7/2018 265806I-411-218-01-01 E 100-10520-5005 32,926.14 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 01/01/18-01/3 3/7/2018 265806I-411-218-01-03 E 100-10520-5005 6,120.00 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES VENOOK 01/01- 3/7/2018 265806I-411-218-01-05 E 100-10520-5005 4,582.50 BUILDING ADMIN SERVICES ROMERO 01/01-01/3 3/14/2018 266005I-414-218-01-01- E 100-10520-5005 825.00 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES-C3 560 ECCLES Payments issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $216,477.07 FINANCE ADVANCED BUSINESS FORMS 3/7/2018 26567630436 E 100-06210-5021 309.71 CITY OF SSF WINDOW ENVELOPES ADVANTAGE LASER PRODUCTS INC 3/7/2018 265796CC366604 E 100-06210-5021 127.88 KM - CHECK STOCK ORDER ALPHAGRAPHICS #493 3/7/2018 26567959981 E 100-06210-5021 782.65 PRINTING SERVICES FOR 2017 CAFR AMAZON.COM 3/16/2018 266047CC365582 E 100-06110-5021 -12.01 KM - CREDIT FOR CHARGING MEMBERSHIP FEE CA SOCIETY MUNI FINANCE OFFICE3/16/2018 266047CC366598 E 100-06110-5032 -295.00 AT - REFUND FOR 2018 CSMFO CONFERENCE REG CHEF'S EXPERIENCE CHINA BISTRO3/9/2018 265866CC366801 E 100-06110-5031 1,120.00 JB - CSMFO 02/06/18 MTG MEAL CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 3/7/2018 2657025010121043 E 100-06110-5020 82.00 CITY HALL - FIRST AID CABINET SUPPLY CITYGATE ASSOCIATES LLC 3/9/2018 26582324513 E 100-06110-5005 2,858.63 FIRE CONSULTING SERVICES COSTCO 3/9/2018 265866CC366799 E 100-06110-5031 19.96 JB - CSMFO 02/06 MTG REFRESHMENTS CREST CAFE GRILL 3/7/2018 265796CC366699 E 100-06110-5032 32.35 RL - CALPERS COMMITTEE & BOARD MEETING LU CVS PHARMACY 3/9/2018 265866CC366800 E 100-06110-5031 17.29 JB - CSMFO 02/06/18 MTG SUPPLIES HYATT HOTELS - SACRAMENTO, CA 3/7/2018 265796CC366715 E 100-06110-5032 449.92 RL - CALPERS COMMITTEE & BOARD MEETING HO Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 5 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco FINANCE MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC 3/9/2018 265842INV05532 E 100-06110-5005 2,100.00 CONSULTING SVCS TO REVIEW PURCHASING POLI MUNISERVICES, LLC 3/14/2018 265943INV06-002154 E 100-06210-5001 1,262.95 STARS SERVICE FOR 3RD QUARTER 2017 REPORTS NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 3/9/2018 26584711800111 E 100-06110-5005 701.25 2ND AMENDMENT TO USER FEES COST OF SVCS S NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-06210-5027 156.92 STANDARD MAINTENANCE OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/9/2018 265849109763949001 E 100-06210-5020 548.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265849109764322001 E 100-06210-5020 2.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265849111147179001 E 100-06210-5020 262.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265849111147547001 E 100-06210-5020 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265849111555265001 E 100-06210-5020 166.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES PERSONNEL DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 3/7/2018 265764038183 E 100-06110-5005 3,885.00 VISTA HRMS IMPLEMENTATION - SVCS RENDERE 3/7/2018 265764038245 E 100-06110-5005 2,590.00 VISTA HRMS IMPLEMENTATION - SVCS RENDERE READYREFRESH 3/14/2018 26595808C0030587158 E 100-06210-5021 84.04 02/13-03/06/18 WATER COOLER RENTAL/REFILL - SAFEWAY STORE 3/9/2018 265866CC366802 E 100-06110-5020 43.02 JB - CSMFO 02/06/18 MTG SUPPLIES STEVEN LEW 3/14/2018 26593002/20-02/23/18 E 100-06210-5032 311.16 S.LEW CONFERENCE TRAVEL EXPENSES: TRANSPO UBER 3/9/2018 265866CC366803 E 100-06110-5032 57.64 JB - FARE TO OAK AIRPORT FOR CSMFO CONFERE UNIGUEST INC 3/7/2018 265796CC366702 E 100-06110-5032 3.25 RL - CALPERS COMMITTEE & BOARD MEETING CO USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-06210-5027 13.80 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-06110-5071 191.52 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for FINANCE $17,886.88 FIRE ADVANCED BUSINESS FORMS 3/7/2018 26567630434 E 100-11710-5025 46.50 PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS - LANGE-BYRON 3/7/2018 26567630434 E 100-11720-5025 46.50 PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS - LANGE-BYRON ALPHACARD 3/14/2018 265994cc366924 E 100-11720-5021 219.73 MS-OPERATING SUPPLIES ID PRINTER CARD RIBB AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/14/2018 265994cc366892 E 100-11110-5021 29.99 JM-PUBLICATION ON MUNICIPAL BENCHMARKS 3/14/2018 265994cc367271 E 100-11710-5045 576.82 TB-MONITORS (2) - FD 3/14/2018 265994cc367276 E 100-11710-5045 8.73 TB- USB CABLE - FIRE 3/14/2018 265994cc367279 E 100-11710-5045 10.91 TB- 2 PORT USB CAR CHARGER - FIRE ANTHONY FISICARO 3/14/2018 26591401262018 E 100-11720-5033 325.00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT - PARA FF FISICARO CO OFF ARROW INTERNATIONAL 3/7/2018 26568495502050 E 100-11610-5021 67.71 EMS SUPPLIES BOX.NET BUS SRVCS, CA 3/14/2018 265994cc366851 E 100-11310-5021 45.00 KA-MONTHLY BUSINESS LICENSE FEES EOC DISAS CA EMERGENCY SVCS ASSOCIATION 3/14/2018 265994cc366850 E 100-11310-5031 75.00 KA-MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL-CAL EMERG SERVICE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 6 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco FIRE COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATION IN3/9/2018 2658248155 20 044 0364083 E 100-11310-5021 159.72 EOC CABLE SERVICES CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC. 3/16/2018 26602381871891 E 100-11223-5045 250.00 REALQUEST/S.MATEO CO. FORECLOSURE REPOR COSTCO 3/9/2018 265866cc366754 E 100-11730-5020 21.39 BW - STATION SUPPLIES EMBASSY SUITES 3/14/2018 265994cc366857 E 100-11110-5032 158.81 GK-HOTEL FOR ANNUAL CO FIRE CHIEFS PLANNIN 3/14/2018 265994cc366882 E 100-11110-5032 158.81 JM-HOTEL ANNUAL CO FIRE CHIEFS PLANNING M FAIRMONT HOTEL 3/14/2018 265994cc366897 E 100-11110-5032 62.00 JM-CONFERENCE PARKING FEE EXEC MGMT RETR FEDEX 3/9/2018 2658316-091-33691 E 100-11610-5021 33.63 MAIL SERVICES 3/9/2018 2658316-091-33691 E 100-11710-5021 49.11 MAIL SERVICES 3/9/2018 2658316-098-35168 E 100-11610-5021 103.37 MAILING SERVICE 3/9/2018 2658316-105-67072 E 100-11610-5021 148.16 MAIL SERVICE FLYERS 3/14/2018 265994cc366860 E 100-11110-5021 40.00 GK-FUEL FOR VEHICLE - PUMP OUT OF ORDER 3/14/2018 265994cc366886 E 100-11710-5028 35.00 JM-FUEL - PUMP TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER IAFC- INTL ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEF3/14/2018 265994cc366888 E 100-11110-5031 279.00 JM-MEMBERSHIP FIRE CHIEF ASSOCIATION INDUSTRIAL EMERGENCY COUNCIL 3/14/2018 265994cc366917 E 100-11720-5033 2,905.00 MS-STAFF DEVELOPMENT RESCUE SYSTEMS II CLA J & J BAKERY 3/14/2018 265994cc366865 E 100-11110-5021 45.00 KA-RETIREMENT REFRESHMENTS FOR CHIEF KOH JAMES ANDERSON 3/7/2018 2656822/26/18 E 100-11720-5033 80.00 CLASS TUITION REIMBURSEMENT JOHN THE SIGN GUY 3/14/2018 265994cc367091 E 100-11110-5036 78.69 AR-PARA FF NEW HIRE UNIFORMS KAISER PERMANENTE - OHSS 3/7/2018 265737320900248601 E 100-11110-5036 1,792.80 DEC 2017 & JAN 2018 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSIC L N CURTIS & SONS 3/9/2018 265840INV159230 E 100-11710-5061 278.59 WILDLAND BOOTS 3/14/2018 265927INV159510 E 100-11710-5061 1,665.84 WILDLAND PPE LIFE-ASSIST INC 3/7/2018 265744841882 E 100-11610-5021 711.33 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265744842660 E 100-11610-5021 437.56 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265744842706 E 100-11610-5021 44.68 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265744843052 E 100-11610-5021 769.12 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265744843173 E 100-11610-5021 587.76 EMS SUPPLIES LOWE'S CREDIT SERVICES 3/16/2018 266033916683 E 100-11710-5021 108.76 STATION SUPPLIES MARRIOTT HOTELS 3/14/2018 265994cc366877 E 100-11110-5036 12.00 JM-MEETING - PARKING FEES MICHAEL'S 3/14/2018 265994cc366889 E 100-11110-5021 120.71 JM-FRAMING FOR STATION ART NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-11610-5027 2.57 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-11110-5027 21.41 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-11223-5027 12.19 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-11210-5027 183.63 STANDARD MAINTENANCE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 7 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco FIRE OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/7/2018 265758108415819001 E 100-11610-5021 66.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES ORCHARD SUPPLY 3/14/2018 265994cc367093 E 100-11730-5021 6.54 AR-OPERATING SUPPLIES FOR STA 64 BRISTLE BR PENINSULA COUNCIL LIONS CLUB 3/7/2018 26576303/06/2018 MS E 100-11110-5031 65.00 MS-POLICE & FIRE AWARDS DINNER-PENN COUN POWER WORKS 3/14/2018 265994cc366849 E 100-11310-5021 215.35 KA-OPERATING SUPPLIES RAPID CHARGER FOR E PWW MEDIA INC 3/9/2018 2658542018-491 E 100-11720-5033 3,390.00 AMBULANCE BILLING CONFERENCE (2) RACHAEL RIDENOUR 3/9/2018 2658561/20/18 RR E 100-11610-5033 316.87 STAFF DEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENT - PARA F READYREFRESH 3/14/2018 26595818B5711311000 E 100-11110-5021 8.73 WATER SERVICE SAFEWAY STORE 3/14/2018 265994cc367096 E 100-11730-5020 3.05 AR-STATION 63 OPERATING SUPPLIES SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK INC3/9/2018 26585822501 E 100-11710-5071 1,006.75 FIRE STATION ALERT FEED SERVICES SATCOM GLOBAL, INC. 3/14/2018 265994cc366894 E 100-11310-5021 42.75 JM-MONTHLY DIST. PREP SATELLITE SERVICE TSI INC 3/9/2018 265866cc366678 E 100-11710-5061 2,795.00 BS- SCBA FIT TESTING MACHINE, 3YR. MAINTENA USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-11210-5027 19.35 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-11110-5027 1.88 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-11610-5027 0.23 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-11223-5027 1.07 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11710-5071 1,540.22 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11710-5045 500.72 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11611-5071 253.99 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11610-5071 556.37 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11310-5071 41.09 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11223-5071 38.45 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11110-5071 387.47 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11720-5071 75.29 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-11210-5071 538.10 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509802616548 E 100-11610-5071 7.02 DATA CHARGES - FIRE WOODBRIDGE FIRE DISTRICT 3/7/2018 2658075/16-5/18/18 E 100-11720-5033 1,300.00 TRENCH RESCUE CLASS TUITION (4) WOODSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DIST 3/9/2018 2658722018-1A-01 E 100-11720-5033 2,375.00 DRIVER OPERATOR 1A CLASS (5) 3/14/2018 2660072018-1B-01 E 100-11720-5033 2,625.00 DRIVER OPERATOR 1B CLASS (7) ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 3/7/2018 2658112572271 E 100-11610-5021 734.16 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658112641224 E 100-11610-5021 146.83 EMS SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658112641772 E 100-11610-5021 1,641.81 EMS SUPPLIES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 8 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco FIRE Payments issued for FIRE $33,509.22 HUMAN RESOURCES BOB MURRAY & ASSOCIATES 3/9/2018 2658187572 E 100-09110-5005 3,000.00 EXECUTIVE SEARCH FEE FOR FIRE CHIEF 3/9/2018 2658187620 E 100-09110-5005 4,280.66 EXECUTIVE SEARCH/EXPENSES-FIRE CHIEF RECRUI 3/16/2018 2660177625 E 100-09110-5005 5,705.00 EXECUTIVE SEARCH/EXPENSES-HR DIRECTOR REC CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 3/7/2018 2657025010121043 E 100-09110-5020 82.00 CITY HALL - FIRST AID CABINET SUPPLY CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN3/7/2018 265796CC366630 E 100-09110-5020 116.61 MM-CORODATA SHREDDING SERVICE MONTHLY CPS HR CONSULTING 3/14/2018 265901INV357081 E 100-09110-5005 250.00 360 ASSESSMENT REPORT-CITY MANAGER 3/14/2018 265901INV357804 E 100-09110-5005 380.00 360 ASSESSMENT REPORT CUSTOMIZATION-ECD EQUIFAX 3/7/2018 265796CC366631 E 100-09110-5001 29.28 MM-EQUIFAX MONTHLY ADMINSTRATIVE FEE FRANK IRVIN BENEST 3/9/2018 26581402272018 E 100-09110-5005 3,750.00 SUCCESSION DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVCS NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-09110-5027 5.13 STANDARD MAINTENANCE OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/14/2018 265946111213122001 E 100-09110-5020 51.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES CERTIFICATES/FOLDERS/KLEENE PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC 3/14/2018 2659530139104-IN E 100-09110-5001 353.76 FEBRUARY 2018 PRE EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREE SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY 3/7/2018 265796CC366629 E 100-09110-5031 144.30 MM-HR DIRECTOR FAREWELL RECEPTION-20+PE USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-09110-5027 0.45 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-09110-5071 75.68 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for HUMAN RESOURCES $18,223.94 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/14/2018 265994cc367284 E 785-16110-5020 19.18 TB - OFFICE SUPPLIES & COUNCIL PHONE CHARGE 3/14/2018 265994cc367300 E 785-16110-5021 95.26 TB- ETHERNET CABLES - IT SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265994cc367302 E 785-16110-5021 57.84 TB - MEMORY CARD & FOAM TAPE - IT SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265994cc367303 E 785-16110-5051 371.54 TB - FIBER OPTIC CABLES - IT SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266047cc367248 E 785-16110-5041 -67.59 DW-REFUND COMPUTER SUPPLIES AMAZON.COM 3/14/2018 265994cc367260 E 785-16110-5021 12.01 TB-AMAZON PRIME MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR IT PU BEST BUY 3/16/2018 266047cc367310 E 785-16110-5021 43.49 DW- WIFI CARD - IT BMC SOFTWARE, INC 3/16/2018 2660161315479 E 785-16110-5040 594.96 TRACK-IT PERPETUAL LICENSES (100) & SUPPORT CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 3/7/2018 265700LTW8206 E 785-16110-5040 1,614.60 RSA AUTHENTICATION ANNUAL RENEWAL 3/7/2018 265700LVF3020 E 785-16110-5040 3,870.96 BACK-UP EXEC SOFTWARE RENEWAL CIVIC LLC 3/7/2018 2657041555 E 785-16110-5005 200.00 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE MYCIVIC APP - MARCH Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 9 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATION IN3/16/2018 2660228155 20 044 0622357 E 785-16110-5071 239.05 HIGH SPEED INTERNET SERVICE - TERRABAY COSTCO 3/14/2018 265994cc367220 E 785-16110-5020 -17.99 JD-RETURNED OFFICE SUPPLY 3/16/2018 266047cc367130 E 785-16110-5020 50.26 JD- OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266047cc367193 E 785-16110-5020 35.55 JD-OFFICE SUPPLIES DR MYCOMMERCE INC 3/16/2018 266047cc367326 E 785-16110-5021 39.95 DW - SOFTWARE - IT DEPT. HIGH LINE CORPORATION 3/16/2018 26602921263 E 785-16110-5040 36,940.00 PAYROLL SYSTEM ANNUAL SUPPORT FEES 4/2018 NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 785-16110-5027 0.32 STANDARD MAINTENANCE NETWORK COMPUTING ARCHITECTS 3/16/2018 26603651695 E 785-16110-5044 820.24 PALO ALTO PA220 & 3 YR SUPPORT NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC 3/16/2018 266047cc367230 E 785-16110-5051 7.96 RC - RENEWAL WEBSITE URLS - SSFGOV NINITE.COM 3/14/2018 265994cc367263 E 785-16110-5040 95.00 TB-COMPUTER SECURITY SMART & FINAL STORES LLC 3/16/2018 266047cc367188 E 785-16110-5020 9.47 JD-OFFICE SUPPLIES USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 785-16110-5027 0.03 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 785-16110-5071 232.03 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $45,264.12 LIBRARY 7 MILE HOUSE 3/14/2018 265994CC366989 E 100-15210-5022 107.88 EM - BOOKS ACCO BRANDS USA LLC 3/7/2018 265796CC366689 E 100-15110-5020 568.08 ABS - OFFICE SUPPLIES; PAPER SHREDDER AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC 3/7/2018 2656801G4F-LHVC-QWXH E 100-15110-5020 16.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES - GRAND AVE LIBRARY 3/14/2018 26587917WJ-HCGK-GX6F E 100-15320-5030 31.19 PROGRAM SUPPLIES - JUV 3/14/2018 2658791JKQ-FLR9-JJLF E 100-15320-5030 1.90 YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2658791KT1-FN9V-3N99 E 100-15310-5030 17.83 PROGRAM SUPPLIES - GRAND AVE. LIBRARY 3/14/2018 2658791XPV-WQMW-JWYL E 100-15110-5021 33.34 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2658791XPV-WQMW-QTLX E 100-15320-5030 1.57 YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM SUPPLIES - GRAND 3/14/2018 2658791Y7F-DK3V-1941 E 100-15110-5021 26.23 LAPTOP BAG 3/16/2018 2660081VWG-MMWK-6QY1 E 100-15310-5030 32.63 PROGRAM SUPPLIES - GRAND AVE. LIBRARY 3/16/2018 2660081WT9-Y474-19VX E 100-15999-5999 74.97 MAKERSPACE SUPPLIES - GRAND LIBRARY AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/14/2018 265994cc367292 E 100-15110-5045 18.52 TB - HDMI CABLES - LIBRARY 3/14/2018 265994cc367297 E 100-15110-5045 66.87 TB - SURFACE PRO POWER SUPPLY - LIBRARY 3/14/2018 265994cc367299 E 100-15110-5045 37.79 TB - ETHERNET SWTICH - LIBRARY AMAZON.COM 3/7/2018 265796CC366688 E 100-15110-5021 50.71 ABS- MAKERSPACE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265866cc366787 E 100-15999-5021 1,450.66 AP - BOOKS LEARNING WHEELS Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 10 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco LIBRARY AMAZON.COM 3/14/2018 265994CC367015 E 100-15210-5022 17.76 VS - BOOKS AMERICAN BUTTON 3/14/2018 265994CC366875 E 100-15110-5021 44.89 EM - SUPPLIES - BUTTON MACHINE AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 3/14/2018 265994CC366883 E 100-15210-5022 68.00 EM - BOOKS ANTIGUA COFFEE SHOP 3/14/2018 265994CC367023 E 100-15110-5031 17.05 AE - CAREER OPPORTUNITIES MEETING (3) APPLE STORE 3/16/2018 266047cc367206 E 100-15999-5999 4,272.47 JD- MACBOOK PRO (3) - LIBRARY ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION 3/14/2018 26588203242018 E 100-15230-5030 50.00 ASIAN ART MUSEUM PRESENTATION - 03/24 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 3/14/2018 2658844012113503 E 100-15210-5022 161.06 BOOKS 3/14/2018 2658844012139517 E 100-15210-5022 187.01 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L1161034 E 100-15210-5022 278.85 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L1161034 E 100-15310-5022 105.85 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L1236954 E 100-15210-5022 451.66 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L1236954 E 100-15320-5022 110.23 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L4317184 E 100-15210-5022 342.70 BOOKS 3/16/2018 266013L4317564 E 100-15310-5022 76.41 BOOKS BECKERS SCHOOL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265994CC366999 E 100-15320-5022 506.31 AT - BOOKS - GRAND AVE LIBRARY CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES3/7/2018 26569302/26/18 E 100-15999-5021 5,000.00 STEM TRAININGS/COORDINATION CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER PARTNERS 3/14/2018 2658921017872 E 100-15310-5022 22.95 THE MERCURY NEWS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL - CANVA.COM 3/7/2018 265796CC366712 E 100-15110-5021 12.95 AM - CANVA FOR WORK MONTHLY CHEVY'S 3/14/2018 265994CC367014 E 100-15110-5031 87.31 VS - LUNCH MEETING - MEASURE W PLANNING (8 CORP OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS 3/14/2018 26590003222018 E 100-15230-5030 150.00 DE YOUNG MUSEUM - REVELATIONS PRESENTATI COSTCO 3/14/2018 265994CC366884 E 100-15220-5030 43.69 EM - JUV STORYTIME PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265994CC366887 E 100-15110-5021 57.48 EM - PROGRAM SUPPLIES/ STAFF TRAINING 3/14/2018 265994cc366948 E 100-15999-5999 1,283.93 KB - PROGRAM SUPPLIES /REFRESHMENTS 3/14/2018 265994cc366948 E 100-15999-5021 22.91 KB - PROGRAM SUPPLIES /REFRESHMENTS DELL MARKETING LP 3/7/2018 265796CC366691 E 100-15110-5021 20.75 ABS - AWE POWER ADAPTER DEMCO INC. 3/7/2018 2657126309722 E 100-15110-5021 191.85 TECHNICAL PROCESSING SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2657126316360 E 100-15110-5021 375.96 TECHNICAL PROCESSING SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2659076326053 E 100-15110-5021 108.38 TECHNICAL PROCESSING SUPPLIES DOLLAR TREE STORE 3/14/2018 265994CC366885 E 100-15110-5020 17.73 EM - OFFICE SUPPLIES - MAIN & GRAND AVE. FACEBOOK 3/7/2018 265796CC366696 E 100-15110-5030 5.00 AM- FACEBOOK PROGRAM ADVERTISING SERVICE 3/7/2018 265796CC366697 E 100-15110-5030 24.04 AM - FACEBOOK PROGRAM ADVERTISING SERVIC FIRST BOOK 3/14/2018 265994cc366958 E 100-15999-5022 195.62 KB - BOOKS Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 11 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco LIBRARY GAIL DAVISON 3/7/2018 2657112/28/18 E 100-15999-5999 250.00 PROGRAM INCENTIVES EXP REIMB GAMESTOP 3/14/2018 265994CC366988 E 100-15999-5999 152.93 SS - SUPPLIES- TEEN DIGITAL MEDIA GRANT GE MONEY BANK/AMAZON 3/9/2018 2658340010 3871 E 100-15110-5021 35.00 BOOKS/ AV 3/9/2018 2658340010 3871 E 100-15210-5022 179.76 BOOKS/ AV 3/9/2018 2658340010 3871 E 100-15210-5043 243.22 BOOKS/ AV 3/9/2018 2658340010 3871 E 100-15220-5022 12.29 BOOKS/ AV GOOGLE.COM 3/14/2018 265994CC367001 E 100-15220-5030 47.71 AT - STORY TIME SNACKS 3/14/2018 265994CC367006 E 100-15230-5030 71.51 AT - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS 3/14/2018 265994CC367006 E 100-15110-5021 4.99 AT - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS INC. TEAMSOFTWARE SOLUTIONS 3/7/2018 26578710198 E 100-15110-5045 125.00 ANNUAL RENEWAL PUBLIC BROWSER-LIBRARY ITUNES STORE 3/7/2018 265796CC366698 E 100-15210-5043 14.99 AM - HBO MONTHLY RENEWAL 3/7/2018 265796CC366700 E 100-15210-5043 14.99 AM - NY TIMES MONTHLY RENEWAL LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 3/14/2018 265994CC367004 E 100-15320-5030 188.80 AT - GRAND STORYTIME KITS LAURA ATKINS 3/7/2018 26568703032018 E 100-15220-5030 200.00 CHILDREN'S AUTHOR TALK MASE GROUP LLC 3/7/2018 26574800283 E 100-15110-5001 172.25 DVD LABELING SERVICE 3/14/2018 26593400284 E 100-15110-5001 154.25 DVD LABELING SERVICE 3/16/2018 26603500285 E 100-15110-5001 193.50 DVD LABELING SERVICE MIDWEST TAPE 3/9/2018 2658452000009739 E 100-15310-5043 826.33 A/V 3/9/2018 2658452000009739 E 100-15210-5043 3,385.22 A/V 3/9/2018 2658452000009739 E 100-15220-5043 88.44 A/V 3/14/2018 265938ACCT#2000009742 E 100-15320-5043 516.67 A/V - JUV 3/14/2018 265938ACCT#2000009742 E 100-15220-5043 138.21 A/V - JUV NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-15410-5027 2.17 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-15110-5027 31.51 STANDARD MAINTENANCE OCLC WESTERN 3/14/2018 2659450000585141 E 100-15110-5001 1,212.19 CATALOGING AND METADATA SUBMONTHLY/ W OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/7/2018 265758107318240001 E 100-15430-5020 211.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES - CLC 3/14/2018 265946110373024001 E 100-15110-5020 181.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES - COPY PAPER 3/16/2018 266037112052012001 E 100-15110-5021 71.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES OTHER MACHINE CO. 3/14/2018 265994CC366879 E 100-15110-5021 110.67 EM - PROGRAM SUPPLIES PAYPAL 3/7/2018 265796CC366686 E 100-15110-5021 7.50 ABS - WEB HISTORY TIMELINE PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 3/16/2018 26603812302 E 100-15110-5021 448.01 PRINTER PAPER - 12/13/2017 3/16/2018 26603812325 E 100-15110-5061 642.64 ZOOBEAN - BEANSTACK LICENSE 2/1/18-1/31/19 Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 12 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco LIBRARY PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 3/16/2018 26603812334 E 100-15110-5004 85.53 MARS AUTHORITY CONTROL - 1/31/18 3/16/2018 26603812337 E 100-15110-5045 180.00 NEW CITY IT CREDIT CARD TERMINAL RECORDED BOOKS, INC. 3/7/2018 26577075718471 E 100-15310-5043 98.30 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075720901 E 100-15210-5043 80.69 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075720908 E 100-15310-5043 80.69 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075725672 E 100-15210-5043 49.16 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075726033 E 100-15210-5043 147.46 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075726999 E 100-15210-5043 49.16 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075727215 E 100-15210-5043 49.15 A/V 3/7/2018 26577075727626 E 100-15210-5043 87.38 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975728596 E 100-15210-5043 43.69 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975746609 E 100-15210-5043 43.69 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975748857 E 100-15210-5043 43.70 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975748948 E 100-15210-5043 16.38 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975749211 E 100-15210-5043 27.31 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975750978 E 100-15210-5043 43.70 A/V 3/14/2018 26595975753097 E 100-15310-5043 197.05 A/V SAFEWAY INC 3/7/2018 265775125129 E 100-15410-5030 46.00 PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS / SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265775125129 E 100-15410-5031 40.58 PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS / SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265775125129 E 100-15999-5999 500.00 PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS / SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265775125129 E 100-15999-5021 265.63 PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS / SUPPLIES SAFEWAY STORE 3/7/2018 265796CC366716 E 100-15110-5021 38.58 EM - MAIN LIBRARY STAFF CPR TRAINING (10) 3/7/2018 265796CC366717 E 100-15230-5030 59.99 EM - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS 3/7/2018 265796CC366717 E 100-15110-5021 69.98 EM - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS 3/9/2018 265866cc366778 E 100-15999-5999 95.74 AP - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS, HOMEWORK CL 3/14/2018 265994CC366880 E 100-15230-5030 48.98 EM - VETERANS CONNECT PROGRAM REFRESHM SCHOLASTIC CORPORATION 3/14/2018 26596816678451 E 100-15999-5999 1,939.90 BOOKS - LEARNING WHEELS SMART & FINAL STORES LLC 3/9/2018 265866cc366781 E 100-15430-5033 42.26 AP - REFRESHMENTS, STAFF TRAINING 2/16/18 SOUTH CITY DISCOUNT OUTLET 3/14/2018 265994cc366995 E 100-15999-5999 26.28 KB - PROGRAM SUPPLIES VOC SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY 3/9/2018 265866cc366780 E 100-15430-5031 69.95 AP - REFRESHMENTS, PANEL INTERVIEW 3/14/2018 265994CC366876 E 100-15110-5021 176.98 EM - CPR TRAINING - REFRESHMENTS (12) SSF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3/7/2018 265796CC366714 E 100-15110-5030 375.00 EM - 2018 ANNUAL RECOGNITION & BUSINESS A Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 13 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco LIBRARY STANLEY YOGI 3/7/2018 26580903032018 E 100-15220-5030 200.00 JUV PROGRAM - AUTHOR TALK STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579374/3679779E 100-15110-5020 20.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES - MAIN LIBRARY 3/9/2018 2658628048579374/3679779E 100-15110-5020 22.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES - GRAND LIBRARY STARBUCKS 3/9/2018 265866cc366779 E 100-15430-5031 25.95 AP - REFRESHMENTS FOR INTERVIEW PANEL 3/14/2018 265994CC366881 E 100-15230-5030 31.90 EM- VETERANS CONNECT PROGRAM REFRESHME THAI ORIGINAL BBQ 3/14/2018 265994CC367008 E 100-15110-5031 56.91 VS - LUNCH MEETING - CAREER CONVERSATION ( THE GALE GROUP, INC 3/7/2018 26579063151236 E 100-15210-5022 50.15 BOOKS 3/7/2018 26579063188797 E 100-15210-5022 119.11 BOOKS 3/7/2018 26579063212518 E 100-15210-5022 81.52 BOOKS 3/7/2018 26579063212678 E 100-15210-5022 25.08 BOOKS 3/7/2018 26579063222626 E 100-15310-5022 34.03 BOOKS 3/9/2018 26586463267734 E 100-15210-5022 145.98 BOOKS 3/9/2018 26586463276188 E 100-15210-5022 27.76 BOOKS 3/14/2018 26598863289926 E 100-15210-5022 26.88 BOOKS THE PENWORTHY COMPANY 3/16/2018 2660450537961-IN E 100-15220-5022 2,094.80 BOOKS UNCLE JER'S TRAVELING BEE SHOW3/14/2018 2659951 E 100-15320-5030 325.00 UNCLE JER'S TRAVELING BEE SHOW FOR LIBRARIE 3/14/2018 2659951 E 100-15220-5030 325.00 UNCLE JER'S TRAVELING BEE SHOW FOR LIBRARIE USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-15110-5027 2.77 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-15410-5027 0.19 JB - POSTAGE 3/14/2018 265994CC366890 E 100-15110-5027 10.25 EM - POSTAGE; LIBRARY BOARD PACKETS VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-15110-5071 152.03 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-15430-5071 38.23 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 VERSAME INC 3/14/2018 2660001348 E 100-15999-5999 889.00 WEARABLES FOR WELLNESS GRANT Payments issued for LIBRARY $36,607.92 NON-DEPARTMENTAL AT&T 3/7/2018 2656869391060753 E 781-07210-5071 2,685.01 PHONE CHARGES 3/7/2018 2656869391060855 E 781-07210-5071 1,541.71 PHONE CHARGES 3/7/2018 2656869391060926 E 781-07210-5071 425.58 PHONE CHARGES 3/7/2018 2656869391060935 E 781-07210-5071 425.51 PHONE CHARGES 3/16/2018 266012650 829 1947 221 7 E 781-07210-5071 197.61 PHONE CHARGES CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 3/14/2018 2658933779544444 E 781-07210-5073 18,169.38 WATER SERVICE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 14 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco NON-DEPARTMENTAL CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 3/14/2018 2658940165444444 E 781-07210-5073 145.59 WATER SERVICE 3/14/2018 2658943194444444 E 781-07210-5073 34.48 WATER SERVICE 3/14/2018 2658943310807997 E 781-07210-5073 38.10 WATER SERVICE 3/14/2018 2658949639955148 E 781-07210-5073 38.10 WATER SERVICE 3/16/2018 2660195187444444 E 781-07210-5073 213.41 WATER SERVICE 3/16/2018 2660197733252569 E 781-07210-5073 136.49 WATER SERVICE 3/16/2018 2660197807444444 E 781-07210-5073 14.94 WATER SERVICE CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 3/14/2018 265897LEASE #13-009 E 784-07511-7004 1,745.86 LEASE/OPTION TO PURCHASE #13-009 - THREE ST 3/14/2018 265897LEASE #13-009 E 784-07511-7001 71,117.88 LEASE/OPTION TO PURCHASE #13-009 - THREE ST COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATION IN3/7/2018 2657068155 20 044 0045948 E 100-07110-5001 42.81 CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOMS BUSINESS CABLE CSAC EXCESS INSURANCE AUTHORIT3/16/2018 26602418100423 E 782-07410-5090 11,752.00 FY 2016/2017 WORKERS COMP PREMIUM ADJUS DU-ALL SAFETY LLC 3/16/2018 26602619571 E 100-07110-5001 10,100.00 SAFETY PROGRAM CONSULTANT SERVICES 02/28 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 3/9/2018 26582903/02/2018 EBS E 783-00000-4341 672,329.02 MARCH 2018 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM W/P 3/9/2018 26582903/02/2018 EBS E 783-00000-4342 241,970.07 MARCH 2018 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM W/P 3/9/2018 26582903/02/2018 EBS E 783-00000-4349 30,094.93 MARCH 2018 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM W/P IMPACT TELECOM 3/7/2018 265734608618644 E 781-07210-5071 133.30 LD PHONE CHARGES-ACCT 5202925098 NAGDCA 3/7/2018 26575612062980 E 851-07110-5005 600.00 NAGDCA MEMEBERSHIP DUES NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-07110-5027 0.16 STANDARD MAINTENANCE PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY3/9/2018 2658505616338496-1 E 781-07210-5070 96,841.07 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659480211654236-2 E 781-07210-5070 9.29 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659482500898977-1 E 781-07210-5070 51.52 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659482814692974-1 E 781-07210-5070 103.15 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659483635896993-3 E 781-07210-5070 62.93 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659484575602530-5 E 781-07210-5070 10.14 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659485177240092-8 E 781-07210-5070 343.87 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659485534400076-9 E 781-07210-5070 17.23 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659485548997000-8 E 781-07210-5070 2,208.67 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659486035223249-4 E 781-07210-5070 200.76 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659486152070396-0 E 781-07210-5070 28.40 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659487785237739-7 E 781-07210-5070 115.54 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659488177181277-3 E 781-07210-5070 66.51 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 3/14/2018 2659488286202617-4 E 781-07210-5070 583.70 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 15 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco NON-DEPARTMENTAL PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY3/14/2018 2659488923172305-0 E 781-07210-5070 31.47 GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHOOL HOUSE GROCERY 3/7/2018 2657778661 E 783-07310-5061 305.35 LUNCH & LEARN-HEART HEALTH 25 PEOPLE SST BENEFITS CONSULTING & 3/7/2018 265782109703 E 851-07110-5005 250.00 DEFERRED COMP PROF SVCS-457 UNIVERSITY TR USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-07110-5027 0.01 JB - POSTAGE UTILITY TELEPHONE, INC 3/7/2018 265800126848 E 781-07210-5071 604.20 LD PHONE CHARGES Payments issued for NON-DEPARTMENTAL $1,165,785.75 PARKS & RECREATION ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY3/14/2018 2658775179534 E 100-17420-5050 70.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ALL PARTITIONS 3/16/2018 266047CC367334 E 100-17420-5050 152.40 AH: CITY FAC - OPER SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/9/2018 265866CC366870 E 100-17250-5021 33.22 MM - VIDEO ADAPTER AND VIDED CONVERTER 3/14/2018 265994CC367282 E 100-17310-5021 38.44 GM: PARKS DIV - OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265994cc367289 E 100-17310-5045 19.88 TB - IPHONE CASE - PARK & REC ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3/9/2018 265813758500754 E 100-17320-5034 244.46 UNIFORMS FOR PARKS DIV 3/14/2018 265880758477120 E 100-17410-5034 34.76 UNIFORMS FOR FACILITY DIV 3/14/2018 265880758488932 E 100-17410-5034 59.02 UNIFORMS FOR FACILITY DIV 3/16/2018 266011758512466 E 100-17320-5034 382.46 UNIFORMS FOR PARKS DIV BEST BUY 3/14/2018 265994cc367286 E 100-17110-5045 114.18 TB - APPLE PENCIL - PARK & REC BRIAN RUSSELL STUDIO 3/16/2018 26601816201 E 100-17110-5061 9,000.00 WINDSWEPT 50% DEPOSIT BROADMOOR LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 3/9/2018 26581946319 E 100-17320-5050 163.88 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 26581946428 E 100-17320-5050 677.35 SCULPTURE GARDEN - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 26581946429 E 100-17320-5050 205.39 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 26588946443 E 100-17320-5050 154.04 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 26588946453 E 100-17320-5050 87.18 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP CA PARKS & RECREATION SOCIETY 3/14/2018 265994CC366806 E 100-17110-5033 75.00 MP: REC SUPERVISOR CPRS AD COLE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 3/14/2018 265898229770A E 100-17420-5021 106.85 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265898232571 E 100-17420-5021 3,023.69 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265898232571-2 E 100-17420-5021 66.90 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265898233800 E 100-17420-5021 169.09 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265898234400 E 100-17420-5021 1,860.25 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265898CM229770C E 100-17420-5021 -100.95 CITY FAC - CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATION IN3/7/2018 2657068155 20 044 0252494 E 100-17240-5021 37.43 MONTHLY CABLE BILL FOR TERRABY BLDG. - FEB. Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 16 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PARKS & RECREATION CONSTANT CONTACT, INC. 3/14/2018 265994CC367274 E 100-17110-5050 195.00 GM: MONTHLY EMAIL SERVICE DEA SECURITY SYSTEMS CO INC 3/14/2018 265906C030220181 E 100-17410-5005 140.00 FIRE ALARM SERVICE - FERNEKES BLDG 3/14/2018 265906C031201863 E 100-17410-5005 234.00 FIRE ALARM SERVICE - W.ORANGE LIBRARY 3/14/2018 265906C031201873 E 100-17410-5005 234.00 FIRE ALARM SERVICE - W.ORANGE LIBRARY DOGPOOPBAGS.COM LLC 3/16/2018 2660257143 E 100-17320-5050 3,000.00 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP FALL PROTECTION PROS 3/16/2018 266047CC367332 E 100-17420-5050 98.16 AH: CITY FAC - OPER SUPPLIES FLEXGROUND SURFACES, INC 3/16/2018 2660270198 E 100-17970-5061 11,247.31 MAINT RESURFACING @ ORANGE PARK PLAYGRO FOSSIL INDUSTRIES, INC. 3/14/2018 265994CC367277 E 100-17970-5061 340.00 GM: INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE FOR CENTENNIAL W FRANK AND GROSSMAN 3/9/2018 26583240447590 E 100-17970-5061 9,565.00 HICKEY ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL 3/14/2018 265994CC367283 E 100-17970-5061 499.53 GM: TRASH CART FOR POOL GREG MEDIATI 3/9/2018 2658443/5/18 E 100-17310-5033 405.00 ISA ARBORIST EXAM REIMB HUB INTERNATIONAL INSUR SVCS 3/9/2018 265836HubInsFeb18 E 100-17210-5004 2,058.02 INSURANCE PAYMENT FOR FACILITY RENTALS FO KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 3/9/2018 2658391102-00000573844 E 100-17320-5050 451.74 PARKS DIV - PAINT SUPPLIES LOWE'S CREDIT SERVICES 3/16/2018 266033902019 E 100-17320-5050 36.12 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266033902193 E 100-17420-5050 124.16 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266033902589 E 100-17320-5050 197.87 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266033915672 E 100-17420-5050 10.36 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-17310-5027 5.93 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-17110-5027 186.19 STANDARD MAINTENANCE ORCHARD SUPPLY 3/14/2018 265994CC367287 E 100-17320-5050 17.46 GM: PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP PACIFIC SUPERMARKET 3/14/2018 265994CC367281 E 100-17310-5021 81.49 GM: DINNER FOR IPP (15) PAPER DIRECT INC 3/7/2018 2657617380536 E 100-17111-5021 32.98 CERTIFICATE PAPER PESTICIDE APPLICATORS PRO 3/9/2018 265866CC366818 E 100-17320-5050 80.00 JR: PESTICIDE TRAINING FOR BRIAN BRUNELLI 3/9/2018 265866CC366819 E 100-17320-5050 100.00 JR: PESTICIDE TRAINING FOR DONALD LOUIE PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC 3/14/2018 2659530139104-IN E 100-17310-5036 43.00 FEBRUARY 2018 PRE EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREE PRODUCTIVE PRINTING & GRAPHICS3/9/2018 26585332561 E 100-17240-5021 109.25 MIDDLE SCHOOL SPORTS FLYERS PRONTO LASAGNERIA N PIZZERIA 3/7/2018 265796CC366680 E 100-17210-5061 296.92 AD - CIVIC REC TRAINING - LUNCH FOR 26 PEOPLE READYREFRESH 3/16/2018 26604218C5729903004 E 100-17310-5001 45.58 CORP YARD BOTTLED WATER 2/13 - 3/12/18 3/16/2018 26604218C5729903004 E 100-17420-5001 45.58 CORP YARD BOTTLED WATER 2/13 - 3/12/18 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIB3/14/2018 26596039238479-00 E 100-17420-5050 55.60 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 26596039238571-00 E 100-17420-5050 9.63 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP ROOFLINE SUPPLY & DELIVERY 3/14/2018 26596110793511-001 E 100-17420-5050 50.49 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 17 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PARKS & RECREATION SAN MATEO LAWNMOWER INC. 3/9/2018 265857178080 E 100-17320-5050 63.18 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265857178081 E 100-17320-5050 80.88 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265857178082 E 100-17320-5050 220.50 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265857178083 E 100-17320-5050 63.18 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265857178084 E 100-17320-5050 92.59 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265857178085 E 100-17320-5050 153.73 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179109 E 100-17320-5050 90.30 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179110 E 100-17320-5050 95.96 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179112 E 100-17320-5050 111.48 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179116 E 100-17320-5050 231.96 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179117 E 100-17320-5050 77.48 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266043179122 E 100-17320-5050 201.58 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP SCHOOL HOUSE GROCERY 3/14/2018 265994CC367272 E 100-17310-5021 22.87 GM: SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES SMART & FINAL STORES LLC 3/7/2018 265796CC366679 E 100-17210-5061 28.18 AD - CIVIC REC TRAINING - DRINKS FOR 44 PEOPL SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND SUPPLY 3/9/2018 265860940519 E 100-17320-5050 25.01 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265860940718 E 100-17320-5050 46.03 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265860940876 E 100-17320-5050 50.43 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265860940993 E 100-17320-5050 3.05 ALTA LOMA PARK - OPER SUPP 3/9/2018 265860941001 E 100-17320-5050 23.91 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 265971940316 E 100-17420-5050 17.67 CITY FAC - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 265971940732 E 100-17420-5050 15.27 CITY HALL - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 265971940733 E 100-17420-5050 22.91 CITY HALL ANNEX - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 265971940742 E 100-17420-5050 6.50 CITY HALL ANNEX - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266044941136 E 100-17320-5050 119.41 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266044941488 E 100-17320-5050 3.58 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266044941527 E 100-17320-5050 57.16 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/16/2018 266044941628 E 100-17340-5050 95.29 PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY 3/7/2018 265796CC366682 E 100-17210-5061 276.82 AD - CIVIC TRAINING LUNCH FOR 18 PEOPLE SPRINKLER WAREHOUSE 3/9/2018 265866CC366804 E 100-17320-5050 85.81 BC: PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 3/9/2018 265866CC366746 E 100-17320-5050 60.31 BC: PARKS DIV - OPER SUPP 3/14/2018 265994CC366807 E 100-17310-5021 40.29 MP: OFFICE SUPPLIES SURVEY MONKEY 3/14/2018 265994CC367288 E 100-17210-5050 360.00 GM: SURVEY SOFTWARE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 18 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PARKS & RECREATION THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY 3/9/2018 265863912206894 E 100-17970-5061 7,750.00 SELLICK PARK ACCESS ROAD CLEARANCE THE SWENSON GROUP, INC. 3/7/2018 265791213194 E 100-17275-5020 100.51 STAPLES FOR THE COPIER TJC AND ASSOCIATES, INC 3/7/2018 26579432591 E 100-17210-5050 800.50 ON CALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 3/14/2018 26599032517 E 100-17210-5050 3,565.50 ON CALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY TOM DUFFY FLOORING SSF 3/16/2018 266047CC367301 E 100-17420-5050 119.74 AH: MSB - OPER SUPP UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA 3/9/2018 265867114-6011577 E 100-17320-5001 100.89 PORTABLE REST @ PARADISE FIELD 3/9/2018 265867114-6423584 E 100-17320-5001 132.75 PORTABLE REST @ COMMUNITY GARDENS 3/9/2018 265867114-6431675 E 100-17320-5001 100.89 PORTABLE REST @ PONDEROSA FIELD 3/9/2018 265867114-6431676 E 100-17320-5001 100.89 PORTABLE REST @ PARADISE FIELD USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-17310-5027 0.52 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-17110-5027 16.37 JB - POSTAGE VELOX CONSTRUCTION INC 3/16/2018 2660493435 E 100-17970-5061 4,867.70 BURI BURI PARK - PAINT AND REPAIR VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17250-5071 30.11 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 231-17531-5071 29.24 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17999-5999 10.02 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17410-5071 177.84 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17310-5071 216.19 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17310-5045 314.74 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17276-5071 70.15 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17275-5071 67.55 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17260-5071 53.68 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17230-5071 25.54 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17210-5071 25.88 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17110-5071 90.46 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-17270-5071 12.32 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for PARKS & RECREATION $68,295.19 POLICE ADVANCED BUSINESS FORMS 3/14/2018 26587430435 E 100-12110-5020 357.30 EVERY 15 MIN BROCHURES AMERICAN MESSAGING SERVICES 3/16/2018 266009M7175147SC E 100-12410-5071 17.68 PAGER SERVICE - PD & WQCP ANGELA ROMANINI 3/7/2018 26577102/19-2/23/18 AR E 100-12410-5033 304.68 CAPE CONF EXPENSES ANTONIO BAGGETTA 3/14/2018 265883JAN/FEB 2018 AB E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 19 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco POLICE ART'S PENINSULA LOCKSMITH 3/7/2018 265685444283 E 100-12720-5051 36.98 DUPLICATE KEYS FOR DUI TRAILER BECKY DABNEY 3/14/2018 265904JAN/FEB 2018 BD E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES BLAKE MOLYNEUX 3/14/2018 265940JAN/FEB 2018 BM E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3/7/2018 26569402/27/18 E 100-12410-5033 75.00 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES - WINTER CELETTA INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES3/9/2018 26582118-0205 E 100-12720-5036 1,000.00 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION - VAZQUEZ CHRISTOPHER DEVAN 3/14/2018 265908JAN/FEB 2018 CD E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES CLEARS, INC 3/7/2018 26570505/16-05/17/18 E 100-12410-5033 200.00 CLEARS NORTHERN - TRAINING (2) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 3/7/2018 265709JAN. 17, 2018 E 100-12110-5061 1,570.00 RIMS KARPEL INTERFACE 3/9/2018 2658251YSS11801 E 100-12720-5002 7,717.92 MESSAGE SWITCH/CLETS D&M POLYGRAPH 3/9/2018 26582702/28/18 E 100-12720-5036 1,200.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPHS (4) DFS GREEN, INC 3/9/2018 26582826608-6 E 100-12210-5001 398.00 CARPET CLEANING FASTRAK 3/14/2018 265994CC367117 E 100-12720-5051 70.00 LA-FASTRAK REPLENISHMENT (DEC 2017) FEDEX 3/14/2018 2659124417899415 E 100-12210-5027 129.00 FLARES SHIPPING CHARGES GEMALTO COGENT INC 3/14/2018 265919382224 E 100-12210-5001 4,883.23 LIVESCAN MACHINCE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE JON KALLAS 3/16/2018 266031FALL 2017 E 100-12720-5033 180.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT PER MOU KAISER PERMANENTE - OHSS 3/7/2018 265737320900248601 E 100-12720-5036 130.50 DEC 2017 & JAN 2018 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSIC LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 3/14/2018 2659284258147 E 100-12720-5005 196.51 TRANSLATIONS FEB 2018 MARTY MAHON 3/14/2018 265932JAN/FEB 2018 MM E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES MARY ANN SPEDIACCI 3/7/2018 26578002/21-02/22/18 MS E 100-12110-5033 318.19 CPC ADVANCED ROLE OF EXEC ASST - CLASS MERRITT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3/7/2018 26575163575 E 100-12110-5020 620.32 NEW HEADSETS FOR NEW DISPATCHERS NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-12310-5027 64.87 STANDARD MAINTENANCE NICHOLAS MICHELS 3/14/2018 265937JAN/FEB 2018 NM E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/14/2018 265946106801912001 E 100-12110-5020 41.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES - DISPATCH 3/14/2018 265946106801923001 E 100-12110-5020 18.34 DISPATCH SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265946107007693001 E 100-12110-5020 36.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES - DISPATCH 3/14/2018 265946107007695001 E 100-12110-5020 19.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES - DISPATCH PRODUCTIVE PRINTING & GRAPHICS3/14/2018 26595432547 E 100-12210-5025 103.79 ARREST CARD/BOOKING CARD PRINTING SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFE3/9/2018 265859218441 E 100-12720-5036 3,350.00 BASIC POLICE ACADEMY - ZOCCA SSF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3/7/2018 265796CC366673 E 100-12110-5031 150.00 MR - SSF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DINNER SSF SCAVENGER CO INC 3/9/2018 2658610000673755 E 100-12110-5020 150.00 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION SERVICE STAGES UNLIMITED 3/14/2018 2659772018-223 E 100-12210-5001 5,375.00 BLEACHERS FOR EVERY 15 MINS STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3/9/2018 2658628048579435 E 100-12110-5020 704.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 20 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco POLICE STEVEN MILLER 3/14/2018 265939JAN/FEB 2018 SM E 100-12720-5051 80.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR K9 EXPENSES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENG ASSOC 3/14/2018 26598645276 E 100-12410-5001 4,735.00 MONTHLY RADIOS MAINTEN FOR MARCH 2018 3/14/2018 26598645280 E 100-12410-5005 16,583.33 PROF. MONTHLY SERVICES - MARCH 2018 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 3/9/2018 26586527442 E 100-12720-5051 874.00 PARKING CITATION ROLLS (10K) 3/14/2018 26599327530 E 100-12720-5001 4,493.34 FY 17-18 CITATION PROCESSING - JAN 2018 UPS FREIGHT 3/14/2018 2659990000V52111098-PD E 100-12210-5027 20.19 SHIPPING CHARGE FOR TRACKING DEVICE USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-12310-5027 5.70 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-12110-5045 301.72 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-12410-5071 1,801.42 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Payments issued for POLICE $58,793.80 PUBLIC WORKS A-1 MILMAC INC 3/9/2018 265812243055-001 E 710-13943-5051 187.73 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243055-002 E 710-13943-5051 1,404.59 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243055-003 E 710-13943-5051 194.47 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243055-004 E 710-13943-5051 25.14 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243055-005 E 710-13943-5051 370.37 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243062-001 E 710-13943-5051 205.41 SHOP RE-STOCK 3/9/2018 265812243078-001 E 710-13943-5051 34.85 SHOP RE-STOCK ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY3/14/2018 2658775180387 E 710-13941-5021 144.52 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ALL STAR GLASS 3/7/2018 265677WSF087885 E 781-13610-5001 342.15 GARAGE- REPAIRS TO VEH 211 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES 3/7/2018 2656788022713-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 210.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022714-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 474.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022715-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022716-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022717-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022827-MD_SSF E 710-13951-5005 80.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022828-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022829-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022830-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 337.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022898-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022899-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 21 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES 3/7/2018 2656788022912-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/7/2018 2656788022913-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 241.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023245-MD_SSF E 710-13951-5005 163.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023651-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 337.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023652-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 337.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023653-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 289.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023654-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 512.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023655-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 464.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023656-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 482.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023782-MD_SSF E 710-13953-5004 210.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788023812-MD_SSF E 710-13951-5005 7,653.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658788031182-MD_SSF E 710-13951-5005 4,610.00 FY 2017-2018 ANALYTICAL SERVICES AMAZON MKTPLACE 3/14/2018 265994CC364666 E 710-13910-5041 115.60 BS SCADA COMPUTER CONNECTION CABLES AMAZON.COM 3/7/2018 265796CC364662 E 710-13922-5021 64.46 BS OFFICE SUPPLIES REPLACEMENT KEYBOARD F 3/16/2018 266047CC366854 E 710-13961-5051 92.68 BS-OPERATING SUPPLIES AMERICAN AIR SYSTEMS INC 3/7/2018 26568118-0213 E 710-13943-5051 3,980.00 FY17-18 HVAC, BOILERS AND LAB REF UNITS MAI 3/7/2018 26568118-0214 E 710-13943-5051 1,130.00 FY17-18 HVAC, BOILERS AND LAB REF UNITS MAI 3/7/2018 26568118-0223 E 710-13943-5051 1,130.00 FY17-18 HVAC, BOILERS AND LAB REF UNITS MAI 3/7/2018 26568118-0224 E 710-13943-5051 4,520.00 FY17-18 HVAC, BOILERS AND LAB REF UNITS MAI 3/7/2018 26568118-0225 E 710-13943-5051 4,520.00 FY17-18 HVAC, BOILERS AND LAB REF UNITS MAI AMERICAN MESSAGING SERVICES 3/16/2018 266009M7175147SC E 710-13910-5071 73.13 PAGER SERVICE - PD & WQCP APWA NORCAL CHAPTER 3/9/2018 265866CC364664 E 710-13910-5033 395.00 BS PUBLIC WORKS INSTITUTE MODULE 3 BRIAN S 3/9/2018 265866CC364665 E 710-13910-5033 530.00 BS PUBLIC WORKS INSTITUTE MODULE 3 NICK TA AQUADYNE ASSOCIATES 3/16/2018 26601018-007 E 710-13941-5051 2,666.72 REPLACEMENT DO SENSOR ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3/7/2018 265683758477104 E 710-13910-5001 277.57 WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE 3/7/2018 265683758477105 E 710-13910-5001 228.70 WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE 3/7/2018 265683758488916 E 710-13910-5001 133.32 WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE 3/7/2018 265683758488917 E 710-13910-5001 228.70 WEEKLY UNIFORM SERVICE 3/7/2018 265683758488931 E 100-13410-5001 120.69 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/7/2018 265683758488931 E 710-13315-5001 120.68 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/7/2018 265683758500752 E 781-13610-5001 53.95 GARAGE DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/7/2018 265683758500753 E 781-13610-5001 35.95 GARAGE FENDER SEAT COVERS & SHOP TOWELS Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 22 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3/9/2018 265813758500750 E 100-13410-5001 75.68 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/9/2018 265813758500750 E 710-13315-5001 75.69 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/14/2018 265880758512462 E 710-13315-5001 98.94 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/14/2018 265880758512462 E 100-13410-5001 98.93 STREET DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/14/2018 265880758512464 E 781-13610-5001 15.95 GARAGE DIVISION UNIFORMS 3/14/2018 265880758512465 E 781-13610-5001 35.95 GARAGE FENDER SEAT COVERS BAY VALVE SVC & ENGINEERING 3/7/2018 26568833618 E 710-13930-5051 5,123.73 STATION NO. 11 REPLACEMENT AUMA ACTUATO BLUE LINE TRANSFER INC 3/9/2018 2658170000674429 E 710-13962-5004 52,422.68 BIOSOLID DISPOSAL BOOSTER FUELS INC 3/7/2018 2656912071 E 710-13941-5021 83.57 REGULAR UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 3/14/2018 2658882182 E 710-13943-5021 153.59 REGULAR UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED BROADMOOR LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 3/14/2018 26588946449 E 710-13315-5021 291.70 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES C H BULL CO 3/7/2018 265692L30097 E 710-13315-5051 57.95 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWER 3/7/2018 265695133653 E 781-13610-5001 1,843.00 GARAGE- VEH 752 REAPIRS 3/7/2018 265695133801 E 781-13610-5001 4,852.34 GARAGE- REPAIRS TO VEH 752 CARLOS FLORES-MARTINEZ 3/7/2018 2657228/4/17-1/4/18 E 710-13910-5033 1,347.40 GRADE V CERT. REVIEW COURSE IN ELK GROVE F CCP INDUSTRIES, INC. 3/7/2018 265699IN02041298 E 710-13315-5021 2,498.43 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES CITY OF FOSTER CITY 3/9/2018 265822366947 E 100-13450-5033 1,785.00 HANDS-ON TRAINING ELECTRICAL TROUBLESHOO COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 3/7/2018 265708SM-18-00014 E 710-13922-5002 144.72 SMC MOSQUITO ABATEMENT CULLIGAN SANTA CLARA 3/9/2018 2658260079701 E 710-13941-5021 315.95 WATER SOFTENER SERVICE 3/9/2018 2658260080198 E 710-13941-5051 196.50 WATER SOFTENER SERVICE CWEA - SANTA CLARA VALLEY SECT3/14/2018 26590305/15/2018 E 710-13910-5033 195.00 TNI 2018 COURSE REG FOR LAB STAFF CWEA SPECIALTY CONFERENCES 3/14/2018 265994CC364667 E 710-13910-5031 100.00 BS CA WATER ENVIR. ASSOC. RENEWAL MECH. TE DEA SECURITY SYSTEMS CO INC 3/14/2018 265906C021201842 E 720-13720-5005 234.00 MPG FIRE ALARM DENALECT ALARM 3/7/2018 265713R56374 E 710-13922-5050 90.00 QUARTERLY ALARM SERVICE CHARGE DEVIN KEAHI 3/9/2018 2658383/1-3/6/18 E 710-13315-5031 83.93 STANDBY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DISH NETWORK 3/9/2018 265866CC364663 E 710-13910-5005 109.01 BS DISH NETWORK DRD AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 3/7/2018 265714148926 E 710-13943-5051 16.61 NAPA OIL FILTERS 3/7/2018 265714148965 E 710-13943-5051 3.49 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265714148998 E 710-13943-5051 116.40 NAPA OIL DYSERT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3/7/2018 26571513074 E 710-13953-5005 155.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES 3/7/2018 26571513075 E 710-13953-5005 400.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES 3/7/2018 26571513076 E 710-13953-5005 800.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 23 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS DYSERT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3/7/2018 26571513077 E 710-13953-5005 245.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES 3/7/2018 26571513078 E 710-13953-5005 245.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES 3/7/2018 26571513079 E 710-13953-5005 245.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES 3/7/2018 26571513080 E 710-13953-5005 155.00 FY 2017-2018 SAMPLING SERVICES EMERGENCY VEHICLE GROUP INC 3/7/2018 26571723222 E 781-13610-5021 222.47 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 505 ERLER & KALINOWSKI, INC. 3/9/2018 265830B70050.02 E 710-13910-5002 9,000.00 CIP ENGINEERING STAFF AUGMENTATION EUGENIO GARZA 3/14/2018 26591711/10/2017 E 710-13910-5033 340.00 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL FOR GENE GARZA FASTENAL COMPANY 3/7/2018 265720CAS1031314 E 781-13610-5021 98.98 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES FLYERS ENERGY LLC 3/7/2018 26572318-647838 E 781-13610-5028 3,373.27 FS 63 FUEL 3/7/2018 26572318-647839 E 781-13610-5021 1,301.23 FS 65 FUEL 3/7/2018 26572318-649413 E 781-13610-5028 363.45 GARAGE- ANTIFREEZE 3/7/2018 265723CFS1569326 E 781-13610-5028 9,929.75 CITYWIDE CARDLOCK FUEL FOSTER FLOW CONTROL 3/7/2018 26572418-2900 E 710-13943-5051 3,314.65 PLUG VALVES GCS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPT SVCS 3/7/2018 26572617168 E 781-13610-5021 168.20 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 310 GLOBAL SUN LANDSCAPE 3/14/2018 2659203899 E 710-13943-5050 19,275.00 LANDSCAPE SERVICE - PLANT ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE TRUCK CENTER 3/7/2018 265728F005832140:01 E 781-13610-5021 425.02 GARAGE- OPER SUPPLIES VEH 318 GOLDEN STATE CHEMICAL & SUPPLY3/7/2018 265729770394 E 710-13922-5050 970.50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES GRANITEROCK COMPANY 3/9/2018 2658351089014 E 100-13411-5021 1,108.17 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658351090352 E 100-13411-5021 224.84 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658351091295 E 710-13315-5021 635.69 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 3/7/2018 265732003L8782 E 710-13943-5051 260.48 SHOP PVC FITTING RE-STOCK HARRISON & BONINI 3/16/2018 266028741732 E 710-13942-5051 1,375.50 SHOP RE-STOCK HOWARD GRAY 3/7/2018 2657312/9/18-2/21/18 E 710-13315-5031 141.70 STANDBY & CLASS MILEAGE REIMB. FOR H. GRAY IDEXX DISTRIBUTION, INC. 3/7/2018 2657333027782512 E 710-13951-5021 2,874.96 LAB SUPPLY RESTOCK EFFLUENT MONITORING INTERSTATE GRADING & PAVING IN3/14/2018 2659245284 E 740-13810-5005 71,252.58 STORM DRAIN FAILURE REPAIR AT J SERRA NEAR JAVIER VASQUEZ 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13910-5033 20.00 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13953-5022 9.49 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13953-5021 50.00 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13932-5021 19.98 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13910-5036 71.26 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13910-5021 65.29 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3/7/2018 26580111/28/17-03/05/2018 E 710-13922-5021 81.65 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 24 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS K-119 OF CALIFORNIA 3/7/2018 26573572428 E 710-13922-5050 93.99 SHOULDER HARNESS & OIL 3/7/2018 26573572455 E 710-13932-5051 182.46 TRIMMER LINE & BUMP CAPS 3/7/2018 26573572473 E 710-13922-5051 160.93 TAPER SOCKET & TAPER SOCKET CAP 3/9/2018 26583772571 E 710-13943-5051 51.29 TOOL FOR BOILER 3 REPAIR KAISER PERMANENTE - OHSS 3/7/2018 265737320900248601 E 710-13310-5036 292.50 DEC 2017 & JAN 2018 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSIC KEN GRADY COMPANY INC 3/7/2018 2657391953A E 710-13964-5051 1,793.48 PUMP MOTORS, ASSY AND TUBING KITS 3/7/2018 2657391962A E 710-13942-5051 1,057.19 SENSORS FOR DISINFECTION AND CHLORINATION KUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO INC 3/7/2018 2657420000117854 E 781-13610-5001 403.57 GARAGE- REPAIR STOCK REMOTE 3/7/2018 2657420000117970 E 781-13610-5021 267.96 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES LEO TORIO OPTOMETRIC CORP 3/16/2018 266032104 E 740-13820-5034 539.00 SAFETY GLASSES FOR J.MCDANIEL & D.KEAHI LOWE'S CREDIT SERVICES 3/16/2018 266033902075 E 100-13450-5021 15.56 SIGNALS OPER SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266033902184 E 740-13820-5021 142.36 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266033915601 E 710-13943-5051 95.40 DE SCALER RE-STOCK M J BORG LOCKSMITHS 3/7/2018 26574529225 E 710-13922-5050 160.41 LOCK REPLACMENT & KEYS MARGARET KELLEY 3/7/2018 2657382/28/2018 E 710-13910-5033 229.52 CWEA/ DKF SUPERVISOR TRAINING 101 MEG KEL MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 3/7/2018 26574956761105 E 710-13922-5050 1,216.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES FALL PROTECTION EQUIPT 3/7/2018 26574956967313 E 710-13944-5051 689.06 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - FILTER RESTOCK 3/7/2018 26574957044659 E 710-13943-5051 1,111.75 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 26574957067988 E 710-13943-5051 1,032.95 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 26574957176435 E 710-13943-5051 133.40 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 26584357357434 E 710-13943-5051 348.44 PIPE THREAD SEALANTS 3/9/2018 26584357512379 E 710-13922-5050 418.19 RE-STOCK CAMLOCK FITTINGS 3/9/2018 26584357695642 E 710-13951-5051 1,052.99 REPLACEMENT CYCLE FOR LAB METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 3/7/2018 265752054614 E 781-13610-5001 199.00 GARAGE- VEH 516 HEADSEAT REPAIRS 3/7/2018 26575242064 E 710-13922-5021 3,297.04 PUBLIC WORKS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT MMANC 3/14/2018 265994CC366852 E 710-13910-5033 75.00 BS MUNIPAL MANG. ASSOC. N. CA ANNUAL MEM 3/14/2018 265994CC366853 E 710-13910-5033 80.00 BS MUNC. ASSOC. 1 DAY LEADERSHIP CONF. REGI MOBILE CALIBRATION SERVICES LL3/9/2018 2658462439 E 710-13910-5061 211.50 GAS METER CALIBRATION MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPT CORP 3/7/2018 265754531342-001 E 710-13910-5034 144.63 RAIN GEAR FOR NEW EMPLOYEE D. SAFRADIN 3/7/2018 265754531373-001 E 710-13943-5051 243.68 1" NOZZLES 3/7/2018 265754531473-001 E 710-13910-5021 22.49 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265754531489-001 E 710-13932-5051 243.68 1" NOZZLES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 25 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPT CORP 3/7/2018 265754531611-001 E 740-13820-5021 200.17 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265941531579-001 E 740-13820-5021 75.74 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265941531611-001 E 740-13820-5021 200.17 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265941531614-001 E 740-13820-5021 184.27 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES MUNIQUIP, LLC 3/14/2018 265942104098 E 710-13942-5051 9,235.19 REPLACEMENT LINER GROOVE FOR DIGESTER NO. NELSON YUK 3/7/2018 2658101/25/2018 E 710-13953-5033 180.00 CWEA MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR NELSON YUK 3/7/2018 2658102/27/2018 E 710-13953-5033 80.33 CWEA SEMINAR MILEAGE AND TOLLS FOR NELSO NEOPOST USA INC 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 710-13310-5027 42.42 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 710-13910-5027 25.18 STANDARD MAINTENANCE 3/14/2018 26594455594906 E 100-13210-5027 7.94 STANDARD MAINTENANCE NEW PIG 3/7/2018 26575722413018-00 E 710-13941-5051 1,547.53 SPILL CONTAINMENTFOR POLYMER - DAFT NICK TALBOT 3/7/2018 2657862/26-2/28/18 E 710-13910-5031 69.99 BRIDGE TOLLS AND MILEAGE FOR LEADERSHIP TR NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL 3/9/2018 265848049766 E 710-13951-5004 1,100.00 DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OFFICE DEPOT INC 3/7/2018 265758106049828001 E 710-13910-5021 204.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265758107322640001 E 710-13910-5021 219.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265758108416687001 E 710-13953-5021 121.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266037947254665001 E 100-13210-5020 76.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR ENGINEERING OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. 3/7/2018 265759500019793 E 710-13910-5001 660.00 CATCH BASIN INSERT MAINTENANCE OLE'S CARBURETOR & ELEC INC 3/14/2018 265947418835 E 781-13610-5021 99.92 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 906 PAINTLESS DENT REPAIR SERVICE 3/7/2018 2657608 E 781-13610-5021 185.00 GARAGE- REPAIRS TO VEH 238 PATRICK CAYLAO 3/7/2018 2656982/15-2/28/18 E 100-13210-5032 41.25 TRANSPORTATION FOR OYSTER POINT DEVELOP PENINSULA BATTERY CO 3/7/2018 265762124581 E 100-13411-5051 64.89 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265950124364 E 720-13720-5021 108.61 PARKING DISTRICT OPER SUPPLIES POLYDYNE INC 3/14/2018 2659511213997 E 710-13943-5021 12,563.75 FY2017-2018 POLYMER (CLARIFLOC) SUPPLY PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC 3/14/2018 2659530139104-IN E 710-13310-5039 61.00 FEBRUARY 2018 PRE EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREE PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP3/9/2018 2658526656 E 720-13720-5005 15,595.88 VEH 403- ALPR CAMERA INSTALLATION PRODUCTIVE PRINTING & GRAPHICS3/14/2018 26595432566 E 710-13953-5021 147.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES PUMP REPAIR SERVICE 3/7/2018 265767038749 E 710-13941-5051 -28.28 CREDIT-INCORRECT PARTS SHIPPED 3/7/2018 265767038812 E 710-13941-5051 168.85 PUMP REPAIR PARTS - RESTOCK 3/16/2018 266040038818 E 710-13943-5051 1,038.56 MOYNO PUMP REPLACEMENT PARTS 3/16/2018 266040038819 E 710-13943-5051 6,497.81 MOYNO PUMP REPLACEMENT PARTS 3/16/2018 266040038820 E 710-13943-5051 -488.29 CREDIT FOR INCORRECT PART SENT Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 26 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS PUMPWORKS 3/7/2018 2657686628 E 710-13943-5051 2,345.01 REPLACEMENT PUMP QUENVOLD'S SAFETY SHOES 3/7/2018 26576961133 E 710-13910-5021 158.42 SAFETY SHOES FOR EDGAR SANTA MARIA R&B COMPANY 3/9/2018 265855S1719295.002 E 740-13820-5021 87.00 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265855S1724262.001 E 740-13820-5021 521.01 STORM MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266041S1724585.001 E 710-13315-5021 254.13 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES READYREFRESH 3/14/2018 26595818C0028246270 E 710-13910-5021 222.52 DRINKING WATER 02/07-03/06/18 3/16/2018 26604218C5729903004 E 100-13410-5001 45.58 CORP YARD BOTTLED WATER 2/13 - 3/12/18 3/16/2018 26604218C5729903004 E 781-13610-5001 45.59 CORP YARD BOTTLED WATER 2/13 - 3/12/18 SABRE BACKFLOW LLC 3/7/2018 265772293 E 710-13922-5050 107.80 BACKFLOW TEST KIT CALIBRATION SAFETY COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT 3/7/2018 26577300008842 E 710-13910-5033 895.00 ANNUAL TITLE 22 TRAINING 3/7/2018 265773020118-04 E 710-13910-5033 31.20 OSHA BLOODBORNE PATHOGEN TRAINING 3/14/2018 265962031318-01 E 710-13910-5033 140.00 OSHA LOCKOUT/TAGOUT ANNUAL SAFETY TRAINI SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 3/7/2018 26577476041834 E 710-13942-5050 633.18 PARTS CLEANER SERVICE 3/14/2018 26596376252962 E 710-13942-5051 65.00 WASTE OIL RECYCLING SAN FRANCISCO HARLEY-DAVIDSON 3/14/2018 265966393969 E 781-13610-5021 173.08 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH # 44 SCHAEFFER MFG CO 3/7/2018 265776FF24535-INV1 E 710-13941-5051 2,004.20 BULK OIL SERRAMONTE FORD INC 3/7/2018 265778609903 E 781-13610-5021 222.94 GARAGE- SEAT BELT VEH 245 3/14/2018 265969610177 E 781-13610-5021 33.21 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 233 3/14/2018 265969610288 E 781-13610-5021 17.19 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 233 3/14/2018 265969610657 E 781-13610-5021 54.30 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES- VEH 125 SOUTH CITY CAR WASH INC 3/14/2018 2659703107 E 781-13610-5001 668.45 CITY VEHICLES CAR WASH SERVICE FOR THE MON SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND SUPPLY 3/7/2018 265779939850 E 781-13610-5021 5.01 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779939934 E 781-13610-5021 4.46 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779939956 E 781-13610-5021 12.39 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779940340 E 100-13411-5021 25.48 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779940343 E 781-13610-5021 18.56 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779940511 E 710-13315-5021 105.22 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 265779940652 E 100-13411-5021 36.43 STREET MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265860925315 E 710-13315-5021 15.28 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265860927327 E 710-13315-5021 38.19 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 265860940885 E 710-13315-5021 26.54 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265971940845 E 710-13315-5021 6.54 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 27 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND SUPPLY 3/16/2018 266044941241 E 710-13315-5021 44.67 SEWER MAINT OPER SUPPLIES 3/16/2018 266044941637 E 710-13943-5051 14.06 REPLACEMENT HANDLE FOR FLAME ARRESTOR F SPARTAN MOTOR CHASSIS, INC. 3/14/2018 265972IN00722750 E 781-13610-5021 369.74 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 509 SSF SCAVENGER CO INC 3/9/2018 2658610000672708 E 710-13962-5072 16,572.04 DEBRIS BOX SVC FOR SWEEPER/VACTOR DUMPSI STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 3/7/2018 265796CC364661 E 710-13910-5042 62.79 BS OFFICE SUPPLIES STEWART CHEVROLET 3/7/2018 265784109985 E 781-13610-5021 30.90 GARAGE- VEH 247 OPER SUPPLIES TECHNICAL SAFETY SERVICES INC 3/14/2018 265985INV0197114 E 710-13951-5005 396.00 FY 2017-18 FUME HOOD/ALARM CALIBRATION & TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS 3/7/2018 265788S020237980 E 710-13941-5051 408.60 TUBING FOR PRIMARY PUMPS THATCHER COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA3/7/2018 265789248313 E 710-13941-5021 5,070.09 FY2017-18 FERRIC CHLORIDE THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 3/14/2018 26598730047657 E 781-13610-5021 46.18 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 0854 THE LIGHTHOUSE, INC 3/14/2018 2659890398889 E 781-13610-5021 32.24 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 515 & 516 THOMAS BLAKISTON 3/9/2018 2658163/1-3/6/18 E 710-13315-5031 154.13 STANDBY MILEAGE REIMB. FOR T.BLAKISTON THOMAS FISH COMPANY 3/7/2018 26579222449 E 710-13951-5021 141.50 BIOASSAY SPECIMEN TRACTION-GENUINE PARTS CO. 3/7/2018 265795853309290 E 781-13610-5021 13.04 GARAGE STOCK OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 265991853309377 E 781-13610-5021 16.18 GARAGE STOCK & VEH 252 OPER SUPPLIES TRANSENE COMPANY, INC 3/14/2018 265992155399 E 710-13951-5021 1,040.41 LAB SUPPLIES UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3/14/2018 3141803/02/18 3010556 E 710-13910-7004 76,358.13 CA WATER & WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS SE UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA 3/16/2018 266048114-6464896 E 710-13922-5051 104.43 RESTROOM FACILITIES SERVICES (03/03-03/30/18 UNIVAR USA INC 3/7/2018 265798SJ864421 E 710-13964-5021 5,335.01 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM BISULFITE 3/7/2018 265798SJ864855 E 710-13964-5021 5,285.10 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM BISULFITE 3/9/2018 265868SJ865483 E 710-13944-5021 2,559.07 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3/9/2018 265868SJ866184 E 710-13964-5021 5,441.31 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM BISULFITE 3/14/2018 265997SJ866997 E 710-13944-5021 2,565.48 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3/14/2018 265997SJ866998 E 710-13944-5021 2,665.16 FY 2017-2018 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE UPS FREIGHT 3/14/2018 2659990000V52111098 E 710-13922-5050 17.30 OUTGOING FREIGHT USA FLEET SOLUTIONS 3/7/2018 26579931237 E 781-13610-5001 92.55 GPS FOR STREET SWEEPERS USPS 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 710-13310-5027 0.52 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 710-13910-5027 2.22 JB - POSTAGE 3/9/2018 265866CC366793 E 100-13210-5027 0.70 JB - POSTAGE VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13210-5071 264.52 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13220-5071 70.33 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13410-5071 214.66 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 28 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS VERIZON WIRELESS 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13411-5071 66.35 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 720-13720-5071 51.94 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13310-5071 52.02 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13910-5045 657.14 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13420-5071 12.67 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13910-5071 410.88 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 740-13820-5071 71.41 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13315-5045 478.61 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13315-5071 220.53 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 781-13610-5071 87.52 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 710-13310-5045 806.36 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13450-5071 35.12 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 3/16/2018 2660509801851458 E 100-13430-5071 28.17 CITYWIDE IPHONES, IPADS, MIFI/DATA - 07/2017 VWR INTERNATIONAL LLC 3/7/2018 2658038081064497 E 710-13951-5021 34.47 LAB SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658698081482956 E 710-13951-5021 17.77 LAB SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658698081502945 E 710-13951-5021 185.23 LAB SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2660018081588213 E 710-13910-5021 141.24 LAB SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2660018081593272 E 710-13951-5021 1,011.38 LAB SUPPLIES W.W. GRAINGER INC. 3/7/2018 2658049659407630 E 710-13951-5051 206.05 REPLACEMENT LABORATORY FAUCET 3/7/2018 2658049705149202 E 710-13942-5051 356.21 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658049706879989 E 710-13942-5051 365.84 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658049707021797 E 710-13930-5021 52.40 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES- LABELS FOR 3/7/2018 2658049707021805 E 710-13942-5051 18.50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658049707870912 E 710-13922-5050 97.01 DANGER SIGNS 3/7/2018 2658049708441770 E 781-13610-5021 12.60 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 269 3/7/2018 2658049708441788 E 710-13942-5051 701.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 3/7/2018 2658049713578533 E 100-13450-5021 119.17 SIGNAL OPER SUPPLIES 3/9/2018 2658719712616433 E 710-13922-5051 1,363.44 LED REPLACEMENT LAMPS 3/14/2018 2660029714098077 E 710-13910-5051 138.97 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2660029714370534 E 100-13450-5021 34.22 SIGNAL OPER SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2660029715291184 E 710-13951-5051 346.70 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3/14/2018 2660029717312426 E 710-13931-5051 60.75 REPLACEMENT FUEL LEVEL GAUGE FOR STATION Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 29 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco PUBLIC WORKS W.W. GRAINGER INC. 3/14/2018 2660029717312434 E 710-13943-5050 1,074.13 REPLACEMENT GREASE APPLICATOR 3/16/2018 2660519719181480 E 710-13922-5021 202.62 SAFETY AND WARNING SIGNS WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTM3/14/2018 266006184-1082340 E 781-13610-5021 481.36 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES- VEH 520 3/14/2018 266006184-1082436 E 781-13610-5021 413.54 GARAGE OPER SUPPLIES VEH 902 XEROX CORPORATION 3/16/2018 266047cc367199 E 100-13210-5045 78.53 JD- SCANNER - ENGINEERING DEPT. YAMAHA GOLF CARS OF CALIFORNIA3/7/2018 265808L28878 E 710-13922-5021 127.93 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Payments issued for PUBLIC WORKS $455,044.51 BALANCE SHEET AAE SERVICES INC 3/14/2018 265873E17-0733 B 270-21703 1,728.00 ENCROACH DEPOSIT, 190 AIRPORT BAY AREA PAVING 3/16/2018 266014E18-0088 B 270-21703 2,000.00 ENCROACH DEPOSIT, 138 STARLITE STREET CITY OF BURLINGAME 3/16/2018 2660214TH QTR 2017/2018 YB 280-21204 4,665.60 BID ASSESSMENTS PASS THROUGH JAMES ROBERTS-OBAYASHI CORP 3/14/2018 265925B17-1255 B 270-21724 10,000.00 C & D DEPOSIT REFUND 310 MILLER NELSON HENRIQUEZ 3/14/2018 265923E17-0353 B 270-21703 500.00 ENCROACH DEPOSIT, 218 ALTA LOMA DR THOMAS RANCATORE 3/14/2018 265957E17-0247 B 270-21703 500.00 ENCROACH DEPOSIT, 467 ALHAMBRA RD UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3/14/2018 3141803/02/18 3010556 B 710-11110 -178.62 CA WATER & WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS SE Payments issued for BALANCE SHEET $19,214.98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AKEL ENGINEERING GROUP INC 3/14/2018 26587618432-01 E 710-99999-5999 1,460.00 SEWER MASTER PLAN STUDY BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRIC3/14/2018 26588503-12-2018 E 510-99995-5999 902.00 RIGHT OF ENTRY ANNUAL PERMIT FEE BIGGS CARDOSA 3/14/2018 26588673424 E 510-99999-5999 12,000.00 ON CALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY BKF ENGINEERS 3/9/2018 26581518030036 E 510-99995-5999 28,918.21 CAMPUS PLANNING - SURVEYING AND BASE MAP 3/14/2018 26588718030098 E 710-99999-5999 1,493.50 ON CALL TASK ORDER 2017-2: POTHOLING FOR S 3/16/2018 26601518020019 E 510-99995-5999 26,614.50 COMMUNITY CIVIC CAMPUS PROJECT, BKF ENGI CALLANDER ASSOC LANDSCAPE 3/7/2018 26569617092-2 E 510-99999-5999 3,642.03 ON CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES F 3/16/2018 26602017092-3 E 510-99999-5999 8,684.57 ON CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES F CAROLLO ENGINEERS, PC 3/9/2018 2658200165047 E 710-99999-5999 3,859.50 ON CALL WATER RESOURCES SERVICES 3/14/2018 2658950165195 E 710-99999-5999 3,226.06 CONSULTING SERVICES, WQCP DIGESTER DESIGN KIMLEY-HORN ASSOCIATES INC 3/14/2018 26592610362958 E 510-99995-5999 3,707.50 ON CALL TRAFFIC SERVICES FY 17-18 MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. 3/7/2018 26574729953 E 510-99999-5999 2,414.50 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/7/2018 26574729983 E 510-99999-5999 125.00 SSF BPMP PROJECT Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 30 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. 3/16/2018 26603428712 E 510-99999-5999 5,744.23 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/16/2018 26603429328-A E 510-99999-5999 3,124.00 SSF GBI TCSP: EL CAMINO REAL FROM KAISER TO 3/16/2018 26603429328-B E 510-99999-5999 651.00 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/16/2018 26603429551 E 510-99999-5999 1,406.58 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/16/2018 26603429629-A E 510-99999-5999 87.00 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES 3/16/2018 26603429629-B E 510-99999-5999 93.00 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES 3/16/2018 26603429629-C E 510-99999-5999 846.00 SSF GBI TCSP: EL CAMINO REAL FROM KAISER TO 3/16/2018 26603429629-D E 510-99999-5999 5,100.50 ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/16/2018 26603429792 E 510-99999-5999 695.00 ON CALL SERVICES FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING 3/16/2018 26603429800 E 510-99999-5999 8,045.75 Linden-Spruce Complete Streets 3/16/2018 26603429830 E 510-99999-5999 4,104.57 SSF BPMP PROJECT MICHAEL BAKER INTL, INC 3/14/2018 265936997403 E 514-99999-5999 4,360.00 PEER REVIEW OF STORM DRAIN STUDY: OPD SSA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.3/7/2018 2657816009 E 510-99999-5999 806.13 ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES SWINERTON MGMT & CONSULTING 3/7/2018 26578516100059-I-16 E 514-99999-5999 23,648.00 OYSTER PT PHASE IC- SWINERTON, PM CONSULTI 3/7/2018 26578516100059-I-17 E 514-99999-5999 20,592.00 OYSTER PT PHASE IC- SWINERTON, PM CONSULTI 3/7/2018 26578516100059-I-18 E 514-99999-5999 18,037.00 OYSTER PT PHASE IC- SWINERTON, PM CONSULTI 3/14/2018 26598214100038-42 E 510-99999-5999 34,910.00 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR VARIOU 3/14/2018 26598214100038-42 E 710-99999-5999 30,940.00 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR VARIOU 3/14/2018 26598217100052-1 E 710-99999-5999 2,720.00 ON CALL RESO 141-2017 MULTI-DISCIPLINARY EN 3/14/2018 26598217100052-2 E 710-99999-5999 3,572.00 ON CALL RESO 141-2017 MULTI-DISCIPLINARY EN 3/14/2018 26598217100054-2 E 710-99999-5999 2,256.00 ON CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/14/2018 26598217100055-1 E 510-99999-5999 22,900.00 ON CALL RESO 141-2017 MULTI-DISCIPLINARY EN 3/14/2018 26598217100055-2 E 510-99999-5999 6,500.00 ON CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/14/2018 26598217100059-2 E 710-99999-5999 3,008.00 ON CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/14/2018 26598217100060-1 E 710-99999-5999 2,256.00 ON CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 17-18 3/14/2018 26598317100054-1 E 710-99999-5999 340.00 ON CALL RESO 141-2017 MULTI-DISCIPLINARY EN 3/14/2018 26598317100059-1 E 710-99999-5999 1,615.00 ON CALL RESO 141-2017 MULTI-DISCIPLINARY EN TJKM 3/16/2018 2660460046682 E 510-99999-5999 3,310.00 DOWNTOWN TRUCK RESTRICTION PROJECT 3/16/2018 2660460046845 E 510-99999-5999 917.50 DOWNTOWN TRUCK RESTRICTION PROJECT 3/16/2018 2660460047002 E 510-99999-5999 740.00 OP-E. Grand Ave Corridor Improvements W & S SOLUTIONS LLC 3/9/2018 2658705943160 E 510-99999-5999 12,033.00 EAST OF 101 TRAFFIC MODEL UPDATE Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 31 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Payments issued for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $322,405.63 DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS 3/14/2018 265994cc366936 B 280-27423 210.28 KB - PROGRAM SUPPLIES PE EQUIPMENT CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 3/14/2018 265994CC367225 B 280-27465 195.00 PC-SAP EVALUATOR TRAINING SAMMY JOSEPH CONSTRUCTION EXAM CENTER 3/14/2018 265994CC367231 B 280-27465 850.00 PP-CEC -ICC CBO EXAM PREP ERIK RIETDORF COSTCO 3/14/2018 265994CC366887 B 280-27408 40.00 EM - PROGRAM SUPPLIES/ STAFF TRAINING 3/16/2018 266047cc367234 B 280-27411 542.31 DW-TV FOR E911 MAP DISPLAY - PD DIDDAMS PARTY & TOY STORE 3/14/2018 265994cc366951 B 280-27423 30.50 KB - PROGRAM SUPPLIES DOORDASH 3/9/2018 265866cc366782 B 280-27423 112.32 AP - PROGRAM REFRESHMENTS, VOICES GOURMET COFFEE SOLUTIONS INC. 3/14/2018 26592103061804 B 280-27408 459.04 SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC COFFEE MACHINE IAN LENDLER 3/7/2018 26574302272018 B 280-27408 250.00 IAN LENDLER PRESENTATION FOR SCHOOL KIDS KELLI JO CULLINAN 3/7/2018 2657103/7/18 Cash AdvanceB 280-27402 500.00 CASH ADVANCE FOR SENIOR SVC AND SUPPLIES SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND SUPPLY 3/16/2018 266047cc367237 B 280-27411 2.01 DW- HARDWARE FOR E911 MAP TV INSTALL - PD WATCHGUARD VIDEO 3/14/2018 2660034REINV0006971 B 280-27411 12,687.48 NEW MAVS FOR PST CARS/PATROL CARS Payments issued for DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE $15,878.94 REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS ADRIAN MA 3/7/2018 2657461043143 R 100-17230-35303 1.69 OVERPAYMENT OF AQUATICS CLASS BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 3/7/2018 26568917-352052 R 100-11610-35203 92.42 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 3/7/2018 26569017-420793 R 100-11610-35203 2,100.00 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND CALPERS BC 3/7/2018 26569717-101747 R 100-11610-35203 116.54 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND CLAUDIA FOX 3/14/2018 2659151045433 R 100-17260-35306 100.00 CAN NO LONGER ATTEND EXERCISE CLASSES - ME CONSUELO VILLETA 3/7/2018 2658021043996 R 100-17250-35301 200.00 REFUND OF DEPOSIT FOR USE OF WEST. PARK SH 3/7/2018 26578317-351950 R 100-11610-35203 119.46 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND ERICA GARCIA 3/9/2018 2658331045217 R 100-17250-35301 500.00 RETURNED DAMAGE DEPOSIT IN FULL 3/7/2018 26576517-352634 R 100-11610-35203 113.48 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND 3/7/2018 26575516-4922508 R 100-11610-35203 140.00 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND JAN HALSON 3/14/2018 2659221045224 R 100-17250-35301 350.00 RETURNED DAMAGE DEPOSIT IN FULL KAISER PERMANENTE 3/7/2018 26573617-351945 R 100-11610-35203 2,030.00 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND 3/7/2018 26571917-380392 R 100-11610-35203 200.00 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND 3/7/2018 26573016-491857 R 100-11610-35203 1,391.73 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 32 of 33 VENDOR NAMEDATE CHECK #INVOICE #ACCOUNT #AMOUNT DESCRIPTION Payments issued between and3/5/2018 3/18/2018 -City of South San Francisco REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS OLIVER ELIAS 3/7/2018 265716974051 R 100-00000-35705 7.00 FINES AND FEES REFUND 3/7/2018 26575017-410074 R 100-11610-35203 118.87 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER'S 3/14/2018 265967FEB 2018 R 100-12720-33001 18,514.00 FEB 2018 ALLOCATION OF PARKING PENALTIES UNITED HEALTHCARE INS CO. 3/7/2018 26579717-174201 R 100-11610-35203 1,827.50 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND VANESSA FULGENCIO 3/14/2018 2659161045422 R 100-17250-35301 350.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT RETURNED IN FULL - FOR HALL Payments issued for REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS $28,272.69 TOTAL PAYMENTS FOR PERIOD $2,529,019.74 Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 33 of 33 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:17-1243 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:10. Report regarding a motion to accept the construction improvements of the Alta Loma Park Renovation and Pathway Improvement Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications,with a total construction cost of $256,646. (Sam Bautista, Principal Engineer) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council,by motion accept construction improvements of the Alta Loma Park Renovation and Pathway Improvement Project (CIP Project No.pk1502)as complete in accordance with plans and specifications (total construction cost $256,646). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Alta Loma Park Renovation and Pathway Improvement Project installed new play equipment and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)compliant pathways around the park grounds.The project also constructed a new tiled concrete seat wall,fencing,grill,picnic table,other site furnishing,and drainage.The ADA parking stalls in the lot were relocated and modified. Prior to developing the CIP scope definition,staff did significant outreach to the Alta Loma neighborhood to understand the community’s desires for the park improvments.Feedback from the community indicated that their highest priority was replacement of the old playground equipment and replacement of the walking path with a new ADA compliant pathway. On February 8,2017,City Council awarded the Alta Loma Park Renovation and Pathway Improvement (CIP Project No.pk1502)to Breneman,Inc.of Concord,California.The project work was substantially completed on February 20, 2018. The total construction cost incurred for the project is summarized as follows: Projected Actual Construction Contract $249,989 $249,989 Construction Contingency (10%)$ 25,000 $ 6,657 Total Project Construction Budget $274,989 $256,646 The construction contingency was used for City-approved change orders,such as the installation of an additional catch basin and additional sidewalk repair along the perimeter of the playground. FUNDING Funding for this project was included in the City of South San Francisco Fiscal Year (FY)2016-17 Capital City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:17-1243 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:10. Funding for this project was included in the City of South San Francisco Fiscal Year (FY)2016-17 Capital Improvement Program. The project was delivered under the projected budget. CONCLUSION Staff recommends acceptance of the project as complete.Upon acceptance,a Notice of Completion will be filed with the County of San Mateo Recorder’s office.At the end of the thirty day lien period,the retention funds will be released to Breneman, Inc. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:17-1244 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:11. Report regarding a motion to accept the construction improvements of the Station Alert Package Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications,with a total construction cost of $142,685.(Sam Bautista, Principal Engineer) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council,by motion accept construction improvements of Station Alert Package Project (CIP Project No.pf1706)as complete in accordance with plans and specifications (total construction cost $142,685). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Each of the five fire stations has a fire alerting system that notifies emergency responders of an incident when they are required to respond.The previous system’s hardware was obsolete and parts to repair the system were no longer being manufactured.The Station Alert Package Project upgraded the fire alerting system at each fire station by installing new hardware,software,and cabling.In addition,the new system was tested to ensure interoperability with the systems used by neighboring agencies. On April 26,2017,City Council awarded the Station Alert Package Project (CIP Project No.pf1706)to Telecommunications Engineering Associates (TEA)of San Carlos,California.The project work was substantially completed on March 9, 2018. The total construction cost incurred for the project is summarized as follows: Projected Actual TEA Construction Contract $140,249 $140,249 Construction Contingency (15%)$ 21,037 $ 0 Construction Administration (10%)$ 14,025 $ 2,436 Total Construction Budget $175,311 $142,685 No construction contingency was used for this project. FUNDING This project is included in the City of South San Francisco’s Fiscal Year (FY)2017-18 Capital Improvement Program. The project was delivered on time and under budget. CONCLUSION Staff recommends acceptance of the project as complete.Upon acceptance,a Notice of Completion will be City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:17-1244 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:11. Staff recommends acceptance of the project as complete.Upon acceptance,a Notice of Completion will be filed with the County of San Mateo Recorder’s office.At the end of the thirty day lien period,the retention funds will be released to Telecommunication Engineering Associates. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-194 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:12. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the South San Francisco Police Department to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment,volunteers and contractors,licensing or certification purposes.(Mike Rudis, Police Sergeant) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the South San Francisco Police Department to access state and federal summary criminal history information for employment, volunteers and contractors, licensing or certification purposes. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The California Department of Justice (DOJ)and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)each maintain databases that contain summary criminal history information,commonly referred to as a “rap sheet,”on persons who have been arrested.This criminal history information may be used by agencies to conduct criminal, employment and licensing background investigations.The main method of submitting and requesting criminal history information is by the use of “Live Scan,”which is the paperless technology used to scan and transmit fingerprints. The South San Francisco Police Department already has authorization to access DOJ and FBI criminal history databases for most uses;however,we do not have authorization to access the criminal history information for use in background investigations of applicants or employees of cannabis-related businesses. Per California Penal Code Section 11105 (b)(11),the City Council must specifically authorize the South San Francisco Police Department to be able to access summary criminal history information from the DOJ and FBI to conduct background checks for applicants and employees of cannabis-related businesses within the City. Without this authorization,the South San Francisco Police Department will not be able to conduct thorough background investigations for cannabis-related applicants or employees when reviewing applications for cannabis operator permits. FISCAL IMPACT None. CONCLUSION Adoption of this resolution will authorize the South San Francisco Police Department to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment,certification,or licensing purposes in City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-194 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:12. connection with cannabis-related businesses. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-230 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:12a. Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco approving an application for authorization to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment, volunteers, and contractors, licensing or certification purposes. WHEREAS,Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11)and 13300(b)(11)authorize cities,counties,districts,and joint powers authorities to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment,licensing,or certification purposes; and WHEREAS,Penal Code Section 11105(b)(11)authorizes cities,counties,districts,and joint powers authorities to access federal level criminal history information by transmitting fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice to be transmitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and WHEREAS,Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11)and 13300(b)(11)require that there be a requirement or exclusion from employment,licensing,or certification based on specific criminal conduct on the part of the subject or record; and WHEREAS,Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11)and 13300(b)(11)require the City Council,Board of Supervisors,governing body of a city,county,or district or joint powers authority to specifically authorize access to summary criminal history information for employment, licensing, or certification purposes. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City of South San Francisco is hereby authorized to access state and federal level summary criminal history information for employment,including volunteers and contract employees,licensing and certification of commercial cannabis operations,including transportation,distribution,testing,manufacturing and retail purposes and may not disseminate the information to a private entity. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-232 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:13. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra Boulevard near Westborough Boulevard.(Eunejune Kim,Director of Public Works) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra near Westborough Boulevard. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION City Council has authorized the emergency repair work and budget by resolution at previous meetings on February 14,2018 and March 14,2018.The current resolution is required to continue the emergency work. Authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work will be a recurring council item until project completion. Previous council actions establishing the project and budget are below: On February 14,2018,City Council adopted a resolution authorizing emergency repair work (“Project”)to address the storm drain failure located in the vicinity of Junipero Serra Boulevard,just north of Westborough Boulevard.City Council authorized an agreement with Interstate Grading &Paving of South San Francisco,CA to perform the Project in the amount of $537,525.City Council also authorized an agreement with Cotton, Shires &Associates to design and inspect the Project repair work.The authorized repair work is to clear out the debris,stabilize the undermined cavity with engineered fill,fix the storm drain lines,and reconstruct the failed portion of the roadway accordingly.The Council authorized Budget Amendment No.18.023 in the amount of $663,525 to cover the cost of the Project. On March 14,2018,City Council adopted the continuation of the Project and authorized Budget Amendment No.18.026 in the amount of $23,845,increasing the total Project budget to $687,371.To date,Interstate Grading &Paving has continued the traffic control on Junipero Serra by installing K-rails,cleared and grubbed the affected area,removed the unsafe street section,plugged the storm drain system to prevent any storm water from further erosion,and stabilized the area.Due to the recent rains,however,the repair work has made slow progress.The site needs to dry before any of the grading can occur.Although the site has been stabilized,it is still an extremely dangerous condition for the public.Thus,continuing the Project to complete associated grading,repair and construction work is necessary to cure the dangerous condition and the threat to public health and safety. As required by Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1),this emergency repair project will be placed back on the future regular City Council meeting for the Council to review this emergency action and determine,by a City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-232 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:13. the future regular City Council meeting for the Council to review this emergency action and determine,by a four-fifths vote,whether there is a need to continue the action,until such emergency repairs have been completed and the project terminated.Adoption of the associated resolution authorizes the continuance of the emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs. No budget amendments are being proposed at this time. The following is the current project budget: Projected Initial Repair with Interstate Grading & Paving $ 71,253 Repair Contract with Interstate Grading & Paving $537,525 Initial Engr. with Cotton Shires & Associates $ 11,263 Repair Engineering with Cotton Shires & Associates $ 67,330 Total Project Budget $687,371 During the course of the emergency repair,additional work may be needed and the project budget will be monitored and reconciled, which may include additional budget amendments. There are no federal funds being utilized by this project.There are no disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) goals. FUNDING Currently,the emergency repair work is funded.This emergency repair work may require an additional budget amendment should any unforeseen issues arise and need to be addressed or additional work needs to be performed. CONCLUSION Approving the resolution and adopting the findings will authorize the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra near Westborough Boulevard. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-233 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:13a. Resolution authorizing the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure and related repairs on Junipero Serra Boulevard near Westborough Boulevard. WHEREAS,on February 14,2018,City Council adopted a resolution authorizing emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure located in the vicinity of Junipero Serra Boulevard,just north of Westborough Boulevard;City Council authorized an agreement with Interstate Grading &Paving of South San Francisco,CA to perform the repair work in the amount of $537,525;and City Council approved Budget Amendment No. 18.023 in the amount of $663,525 to cover the cost of the emergency repair project; and WHEREAS,City Council also authorized an agreement with Cotton Shires &Associates to design and inspect the repair work,and to be present on-site during the emergency repair work to provide additional engineering assessments as necessary due to the urgent and unforeseen nature of the proposed repair work; and WHEREAS,the authorized repair work is to clear out the debris,stabilize the undermined cavity with engineered fill and fix the storm drain lines, and reconstruct the failed portion of the roadway accordingly; and WHEREAS,on March 14,2018,City Council approved Budget Amendment No.18.026 in the amount of $23,845, increasing the total emergency repair project budget to $687,371; and WHEREAS,to date,Interstate Grading &Paving has continued the traffic control on Junipero Serra by installing K-rails,cleared and grubbed the affected area,removed the unsafe street section,plugged the storm drain system to prevent any storm water from further erosion, and stabilized the area; and WHEREAS,due to the current wet weather conditions,however,the repair work has made slow progress and the site needs to dry before any of the grading can occur; and WHEREAS,although the site has been stabilized,it is still an extremely dangerous condition for the public and additional emergency repair work is still needed to eliminate the dangerous conditions. FINDINGS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows: A.Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 20168,the public interest and necessity City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-233 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:13a. A.Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 20168,the public interest and necessity demanded the immediate commencement of the above-described work on Junipero Serra in the City and the expenditure of public money for such work to safeguard life, health and property; and B.Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22050,substantial evidence as set forth in the staff report prepared concerning this resolution,and as set forth in this resolution,establishes that emergency conditions continue to exist on Junipero Serra in the City that threaten public health and safety due the storm drain damage,and such emergency conditions would not permit additional delay resulting from competitive solicitation for bids for the work staff ordered done at such properties as described above,and such work continues to be necessary to respond to the emergency conditions on Junipero Serra and eliminate dangerous public road conditions; and C.Terminating the emergency repair project now and let the remaining work on Junipero Serra to competitive bidding would jeopardize the public health,safety and welfare,risk additional damage to public and private property,and result in the public incurring additional expense,including,but not limited to, additional expense due to delay and further damage,and it therefore remains that competitive bidding of such work would not produce an advantage for the public; and D.The emergency work ordered on Junipero Serra in the City continues to be statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15269, subparagraphs (b) and (c). NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby does resolve,by at least a four-fifths vote, as follows: 1.The above recitals are true and correct and hereby declared to be findings of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco. 2.The City Council determines that the emergency conditions at Junipero Serra Boulevard near Westborough Boulevard threatening public health and safety continue to exist and thus authorizes the continuation of emergency repair work to address the storm drain failure emergency and related repairs. 3.City staff is directed,in accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), to place on future regular agendas of the City Council an item concerning the contracts authorized pursuant to this resolution so that the City Council may determine,by at least a four-fifths vote, whether there is a need to continue the emergency work described above or whether such work may be terminated. 4.This resolution shall become effective immediately. 5.Each portion of this resolution is severable.Should any portion of this resolution be adjudged to City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-233 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:13a. 5.Each portion of this resolution is severable.Should any portion of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction,then the remaining resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect,except as to those resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid.The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this resolution and each section,subsection,clause,sentence,phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more section,subsection,clause sentence,phrase or other portion may be held invalid or unconstitutional. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-143 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:14. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue.(Richard Walls,Emergency Medical Services Chief) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The purpose of this staff report is to request that City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a first amendment to a contractual fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC.(“Resolve”)to review ambulance billing accounts that have been designated for write off by our primary billing contractor. On April 27,2016,City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a two-year agreement between the City and Resolve for secondary ambulance billing services.Fire Department staff identified Resolve as being able to recover revenue that the City has not otherwise recovered in the past.The process used by Resolve is proprietary and involves an advanced review of electronic patient care reports (ePCR)and an ability to find personal demographics and insurance information not otherwise available to the City or our primary billing contractor. During the term of the agreement,Resolve has collected $181,422 in revenue that would not have previously been recovered.Fire Department staff believes that Resolve has performed to the City’s expectations and has been a good partner in the Fire Department ambulance revenue-cycle management.Resolve has also proven to be efficient and professional as a secondary means to ensure that all possible revenue is recovered for City ambulance transports.Through the ambulance billing and collection process,Resolve never contacts the patient and only works with information obtained through insurance information sources. Resolve’s current contract with the City requires a 30 percent fee on all recovered revenue.This amendment retains the terms of the original agreement for two additional years and if approved,authorizes the City to pay Resolve above the City Manager’s approval authority threshold of $75,000.This process continues to align with City of South San Francisco Municipal Code §4.04.080,Open market procedures for purchases and sales exclusive of public project,which allows for “open market procedures to be dispensed with if a commodity can only be obtained from one vendor.” City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-143 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:14. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this program is approved as part of the biennial budget for ambulance billing services. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-144 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:14a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC for secondary billing services of aged accounts at a compensation rate not to exceed 30 percent of recovered revenue. WHEREAS,on April 27,2016,City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a two-year agreement between the City and Resolve for secondary ambulance billing services; and WHEREAS,during the term of the agreement,Resolve has collected $181,422 in revenue that would not have previously been recovered; and WHEREAS,the South San Francisco Fire Department (SSFFD)believes that Resolve has performed to the City’s expectations and has been a good partner in the Fire Department ambulance revenue-cycle management; and WHEREAS,the SSFFD staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amendment fee to a for services agreement with Resolve Insurance Systems,LLC., (“Resolve”)to review ambulance billing accounts that have been designated for write off by our primary billing contractor; and WHEREAS,this amendment retains the terms of the original agreement two additional years and,authorizes the City to pay Resolve above the City Manager’s approval authority threshold of $75,000; and WHEREAS,this process continues to align with the South San Francisco Municipal Code subsection (a)of Section 4.04.080 which permits the City to dispense of open market procedures if a commodity can only be obtained from one vendor. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the City Manager to execute a first amendment to a fee for services agreement with Resolve,LLC,attached hereto as Exhibit A,to review ambulance billing accounts that have been designated for write off by the secondary billing contractor, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to take any other action consistent with the intent of this resolution. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-144 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:14a. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND RESOLVE INSURANCE SYSTEMS, LLC THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT is made at South San Francisco, California, as of May 1, 2018 by and between THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Resolve Insurance Systems (“Contractor”), (sometimes referred together as the “Parties”) who agree as follows: RECITALS A. On April 27, 2016, City and Contractor entered that certain Services Agreement (“Agreement”) whereby Contractor agreed to provide secondary billing services. A true and correct copy of the Agreement and its exhibits is attached as Exhibit A. B. City and Contractor now desire to amend the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1.All terms which are defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment, unless specifically provided herein to the contrary. 2.Section 1. The April 30, 2018 end date for the term of services identified in Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby replaced with April 30, 2020. All other terms, conditions and provisions in the Agreement remain in full force and effect. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement will control unless specifically modified by this Amendment. [SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] Exhibit A City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-248 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:15. Report regarding a Resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project to be granted to the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed to effectuate acceptance of the easement.(Sailesh Mehra,Planning Manager) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project to be granted to the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed to effectuate acceptance of the easement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Park SFO Expansion Project at 195 North Access Road (APN 015-173-200)proposes to construct a seven- story parking garage structure to provide approximately 1,500 parking spaces.The new garage would be constructed on City owned property located immediately north (behind)the existing parking garage structure. To provide electricity services for the new garage,the project applicant has proposed to grant the City a public utility easement from the existing parking garage at 195 North Access Road to the new parking garage structure for public utility purposes. The proposed easement to the City would run from the transformers owned by Pacific Gas &Electric Company (PG&E)and be located at the existing Park SFO structure at 195 North Access Road.The easement would then follow along the northern portion of the property line in a linear path toward the proposed new parking garage structure.The proposed electrical conduits would be undergrounded through the entrance/exits of the existing parking garage.A map of the public utility easement located on the existing garage is attached hereto as Attachment 1;an illustration of the existing and proposed PG&E transformers and cabinets with underground conduits is attached hereto as Attachment 2;and an illustration of the easement from the PG&E transformers on the existing garage is attached hereto as Attachment 3. The easement would be used solely for public utilities purposes to provide PG&E connections from the existing transformers and across the existing parking garage lot to the new parking garage structure.The connections will allow PG&E to lay lines and provide electrical power to operate the elevator,electric car chargers,and lights in the new parking garage structure.Based on the project applicant’s communication with PG&E and his representation to City staff, PG&E is in agreement with the proposed connection layout. On March 15,2018,the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission determined,at its regular meeting, that the proposed Easement conforms with the City of South San Francisco’s General Plan in accordance with City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-248 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:15. that the proposed Easement conforms with the City of South San Francisco’s General Plan in accordance with California Government Code Section 65402.The Planning Commission made this determination on the bases that the proposed new garage is consistent with the Mixed Industrial land use designation as set forth under the General Plan,and the proposed Easement would provide electricity services to the new parking garage for essential future operation. Accordingly,City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road and authorize the City Manager to execute an easement deed in substantially the same form as that document is attached to the associated resolution,to effectuate acceptance of the proposed easement. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road,and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed in substantially the same form as that document is attached to the associated resolution to effectuate acceptance of the proposed easement. 1.Map of 195 North Access Road 2.Illustration of the existing and proposed PG&E transformers and cabinets with underground conduits 3.Utility Easement on Park SFO City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ DATE SCALE PROJECT NO. REF. DWG. NO. SKETCH NO. PROJECT Architecture / Engineering / Consulting PARK SFO 03/20/18 13-802 1195 North Access Rd. So. San Francisco, CA APN# 015-173-150 PARK SFO -NEW GARAGE EXPANSION P.G.& E. TRANSFORMER AND TERMINATION CABINET WITH UNDERGROUND CONDUITS PROPOSED TERMINATION CABINET PROPOSED PG&E TRANSFORMER EXISTING PG&E TRANSFORMER DATE SCALE PROJECT NO. REF. DWG. NO. SKETCH NO. PROJECT Architecture / Engineering / Consulting PARK SFO 03/20/18 13-802 2195 North Access Rd. So. San Francisco, CA APN# 015-173-150 PARK SFO -NEW GARAGE EXPANSION P.G.& E. TRANSFORMER AND TERMINATION CABINET WITH SURFACE MOUNTED CONDUITS PROPOSED TERMINATION CABINET PROPOSED PG&E TRANSFORMER EXISTING PG&E TRANSFORMER City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-249 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:15a. Resolution approving the proposed public utility easement on 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project to be granted to the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute an easement deed to effectuate acceptance of the easement. WHEREAS,the Park SFO Expansion Project at 195 North Access Road (APN 015-173-200)proposes to construct a seven-story parking garage structure to provide approximately 1,500 parking spaces,with the new garage to be constructed directly behind the existing parking structure; and WHEREAS,to provide electricity services for the new garage,the project applicant has proposed to grant the City (landlord)a public utility easement from the existing parking garage at 195 North Access Road to the new parking garage structure for public utility purposes; and WHEREAS,the proposed easement would benefit the City as landlord and would run from the transformers owned by Pacific Gas &Electric Company (PG&E)and located at the existing Park SFO structure at 195 North Access Road; and WHEREAS,the easement would follow along the northern portion of the property line in a linear path toward the proposed new parking garage structure with the proposed electrical conduits be undergrounded through the entrance/exits of the existing parking garage; and WHEREAS,the easement would be used solely for public utilities purposes to provide PG&E connections from the existing transformers and across the existing parking garage lot to the new parking garage structure for electrical services; and WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission determined at its regular meeting on March 15, 2018, that the proposed easement conforms with the South San Francisco General Plan; and WHEREAS,the proposed easement is necessary to facilitate construction of the new parking garage as it provides electricity services to the new garage’s elevators,car charges and lights,and would be necessary for operating the new garage in the future. THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby takes the following actions: City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-249 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:15a. 1.Approves the proposed public utility easement at 195 North Access Road for the Park SFO Expansion Project. 2.Authorizes the City Manager to execute an easement deed in substantially the same form as that document is attached hereto as Exhibit A to effectuate the acceptance of the Public Utility Easement, subject to review and approval as to form by the City Attorney,and ake any other action necessary to accomplish the intent of this resolution. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: Location: City/Uninc______________________ Recording Fee $_____________________________ Document Transfer Tax $ __________ [ ] This is a conveyance where the consideration and Value is less than $100.00 (R&T 11911). [ ] Computed on Full Value of Property Conveyed, or [ ] Computed on Full Value Less Liens & Encumbrances Remaining at Time of Sale Signature of declarant or agent determining tax (SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY) LD# EASEMENT DEED NAME OF GRANTOR(S), hereinafter called Grantor, hereby grants to the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, the right from time to time to construct, reconstruct, install, inspect, maintain, replace, remove, and use facilities hereinafter specified, together with a right of way therefor, on, over, and under the easement area as hereinafter set forth, and also ingress thereto and egress therefrom, over and across the lands of Grantor situate in the City of South San Francisco, County of San Mateo, State of California, described as follows: (APN __________) [Insert Lands and Facilities Description] Said easement area is described as follows: The strip(s) of land described in Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof. The foregoing description(s) is/are based on a survey made by Grantor in ____________ (month/year). The bearings used are based on: _____________ (a course in a deed or recorded map /etc.). Grantor further grants to Grantee the right, from time to time, to trim or to cut down any and all trees and brush now or hereafter by Grantee’s qualified and licensed contractors within said easement area, and shall have the further right, from time to time, to trim and cut down trees and brush along each side of said easement area which now or hereafter in the opinion of Grantee may interfere with or be a hazard to the facilities installed hereunder, or as Grantee deems necessary to comply with applicable state or federal regulations. Grantor shall not erect or construct any building or other structure, or drill or operate any well, or construct any reservoir or other obstruction within said easement area, or diminish or substantially add to the ground level in said easement area, or construct any fences that will interfere with the maintenance and operation of said facilities. Grantor acknowledges that they have read the “Grant of Easement Disclosure Statement”, Exhibit “__”, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The legal description herein, or the map attached hereto, defining the location of this utility distribution easement, was prepared by Grantor pursuant to Section 8730 (c) of the Business and Professions Code. The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and all covenants shall apply to and run with the land. Dated: __________________, _______. _________________________________ Name of Grantor __________________________________ Name of Grantor 26932559.1 . State of California County of ) On __________________________, before me, , Here insert name and title of the officer personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) Signature of Notary Public CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [ ] Individual(s) signing for oneself/themselves [ ] Corporate Officer(s) of the above named corporation(s) [ ] Trustee(s) of the above named Trust(s) [ ] Partner(s) of the above named Partnership(s) [ ] Attorney(s)-in-Fact of the above named Principal(s) [ ] Other A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-252 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:16. Report regarding adoption of an Ordinance Levying Special Tax within Community Facilities District No.2017 -01 (Public Services and Facilities).(Jason Rosenberg, City Attorney) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance levying special tax within the City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No.2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities),and waive further reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION On March 14,2018,the City Council introduced an Ordinance Levying Special Tax within Community Facilities District No.2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities).The City Council voted to introduce this ordinance, which now requires a second reading. (Introduced on 3/14/18, Vote 3-1) CONCLUSION This ordinance is ready for adoption. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/23/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-253 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:16a. Ordinance levying special tax within the City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No.2017- 01 (Public Services and Facilities). WHEREAS,on October 11,2017,this City Council adopted Resolution No.17-981 entitled “Resolution of Intention to Establish a City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No.2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities”(the “Resolution of Intention”),and has conducted proceedings (the “Proceedings”)to establish the "City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No.2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities)"(the “CFD”)under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982,Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5,commencing at Section 53311,of the California Government Code (the “Act”)to fund certain public services (the “Services) and public facilities (the "Facilities") as provided in the Act; and WHEREAS,pursuant to notice as specified in the Act,and as part of the Proceedings,this City Council held a public hearing on December 4,2017,as called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the CFD and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (“Special Tax”)to be levied within the CFD to fund the Public Services and Facilities,and at such hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD and the levy of the Special Tax were heard,substantial evidence was presented and considered by this City Council and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS,on December 4,2017,this City Council adopted Resolution No.17-1124 entitled “Resolution of Formation of Community Facilities District,City of South San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities)”(the “Resolution of Formation”),pursuant to which it completed the Proceedings for the establishment of the CFD,the authorization of the levy of the Special Tax within the CFD and the calling of an election within the CFD on the propositions of levying the Special Tax and establishing an appropriations limit within the CFD; and WHEREAS,on March 14,2018,a special election was held among the landowner voters within the CFD at which such voters approved such propositions by the two-thirds vote required by the Act,which has been confirmed by resolution of this City Council. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED that based on the entirety of the record before it,as described below, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1.Authorization of Special Tax 1.By the passage of this Ordinance,this City Council hereby authorizes and levies the Special Tax within CFD No.2017-01 (Public Services and Facilities)pursuant to the Act,at the rate and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of Special Tax set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment as set forth in Exhibit B of the Resolution of Formation,which is incorporated herein by reference.The Special Tax is hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2018-19 and in each fiscal year thereafter to pay for the PublicCity of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-253 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:16a. hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2018-19 and in each fiscal year thereafter to pay for the Public Services and Facilities and all costs of administering the CFD,as contemplated by the Resolution of Formation and the Proceedings. 2.The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific Special Tax to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the CFD,in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation. 3.Exemptions from the levy of the Special Tax shall be as provided in the Resolution of Formation and the applicable provisions of the Act.In no event shall the Special Tax be levied on any parcel within the CFD in excess of the maximum Special Tax specified in the Resolution of Formation. 4.All of the collections of the Special Tax shall be used as provided in the Act and in the Resolution of Formation,including,but not limited to,the payment of costs of the Public Services and Facilities,the payment of City costs in administering the CFD, and the costs of collecting and administering the Special Tax. 5.The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected and shall have the same lien priority,and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes;provided,however,that this City Council may by resolution provide for other appropriate methods of collection of the Special Tax.In addition,the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent Special Tax payments.The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of San Mateo in order to effect proper billing and collection of the Special Tax,so that the Special Tax shall be included on the secured property tax roll of the County of San Mateo for fiscal year 2018-19 and for each fiscal year thereafter until no longer required to pay for the Services or Facilities or until otherwise terminated by the City. SECTION 2.Severability If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the CFD by a court of competent jurisdiction,the remainder of this Ordinance,including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances,shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect.To this end,provisions of this Ordinance are severable.The City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby declares that it would have passed each section,subsection,subdivision,paragraph,sentence, clause,or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections,subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable. SECTION 3.Publication and Effective Date Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 36933,a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney.At least five (5)days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted,the City Clerk shall (1)publish the Summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of this Ordinance.Within fifteen (15)days after the adoption of this Ordinance,the City Clerk shall (1)publish the summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-253 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:16a. ***** Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco held the 14th day of March, 2018. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/16/2018Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-250 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:17. Report regarding adoption of an ordinance amending Title 20 (“Zoning)of the South San Francisco Municipal Code related to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan,in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.550 (Amendments to Zoning Ordinance and Map) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council waive reading and adopt an ordinance making findings and approving amendments to South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.280,to increase the Maximum Density with Incentives in the Downtown Transit Core sub-district of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On February 28,2018,the City Council introduced an ordinance making zoning text amendments to increase the Maximum Density with Incentives in the Downtown Transit Core (DTC)sub-district of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP).The Ordinance would allow for higher density within the DTC sub- district with Incentives provided by the applicant.This ordinance does not impact the maximum heights or overall maximum development permitted within the DSASP. The City Council voted to introduce this ordinance, which now requires a second reading to adopt. (Introduced on 2/28/18, Vote 3-2) CONCLUSION The ordinance is ready for adoption. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-251 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:17a. Ordinance amending the South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance,related to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District,in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.550 ("Amendments to Zoning Ordinance and Map") WHEREAS,in July of 2010,the City Council for the City of South San Francisco (“City”)adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning ordinance,which repealed the then-existing Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code,and replaced it with an entirely new Title 20 that,among other actions, established new zoning districts,revised and reformatted many then-existing zoning provisions,eliminated inconsistent and outdated provisions,and codified entirely new zoning provisions,including new land use regulations and development standards (“Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS,in January of 2015,the City adopted the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (“DSASP”)and companion land use and development regulations in Chapter 20.280 of the Zoning Ordinance,which details the purpose, land use and development standards for the DSASP; and WHEREAS,the proposed revisions to the Zoning Ordinance are intended to provide incentives for high- density residential development adjacent to transit with the provision of public benefits and encourage family- friendly housing; and WHEREAS,the City has prepared a Zoning Amendment (“Amendment”)to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, including refinements to Chapter 20.280 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,the Zoning Ordinance was adopted after preparation,circulation,consideration,and adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”)in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code Sections 21000,et seq.(“CEQA”),in which the IS/MND analyzed the environmental impacts of adopting the Zoning Ordinance and concluded that adoption of the Zoning Ordinance could not have a significant effect on the environment because none of the impacts required to be analyzed under CEQA would exceed established thresholds of significance; and WHEREAS,the City and consultant PlaceWorks Inc.prepared a 2018 Addendum to the 2015 DSASP Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”),which is the appropriate environmental clearance for the proposed revisions to the Zoning Ordinance, since the proposed revision is within the scope of the certified EIR; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed and carefully considered the information in the 2018 Addendum,at a duly noticed public hearing held on February 1,2018,made the findings and recommended approval of the Addendum,since the changes do not alter any of the previous EIR assumptions and no new City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/3/2018Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-251 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:17a. approval of the Addendum,since the changes do not alter any of the previous EIR assumptions and no new significant impacts are identified;and as an objective and accurate document that reflects the independent judgement of the City in the identification,discussion and mitigation of the Project’s environmental impacts; and WHEREAS,the refinements,clarifications,and/or corrections set forth in this Amendment,as they relate to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District in Chapter 20.280 are minor in nature,the adoption of which would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects beyond those disclosed and analyzed in the IS/MND prepared for the Zoning Ordinance,the 2015 DSASP EIR,or the 2018 Addendum prepared for the Project,nor do the refinements, clarifications,and/or corrections constitute a change in the project or change in circumstances that would require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS,on February 1,2018,the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a properly noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the proposed Amendment,take public testimony, and make a recommendation to the City Council on the project; and WHEREAS,on February 28,2018,the City Council for the City of South San Francisco held a properly noticed public hearing to solicit public comment,take public testimony,consider the proposed Amendment,and take action on the proposed Amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED that based on the entirety of the record before it,as described below, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ORDAIN as follows: SECTION I.FINDINGS. Based on the entirety of the record as described above,the City Council for the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the following findings: A.General Findings. 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Ordinance. 2.The record for these proceedings,and upon which this Ordinance is based,includes without limitation, Federal and State law;the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR,including all amendments and updates thereto;the South San Francisco Municipal Code;all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed February 1,2018 meeting;all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the City Council’s duly noticed February 28,2018 meeting;and any other evidence (within the City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/3/2018Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-251 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:17a. meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e) and §21082.2). 3.The refinements,clarifications,and/or corrections set forth in this Amendment,as they relate to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District in Chapter 20.280 are minor in nature,the adoption of which would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects beyond those disclosed and analyzed in the IS/MND prepared for the Zoning Ordinance,the 2015 DSASP EIR,or the 2018 Addendum prepared for the Project,nor do the refinements, clarifications,and/or corrections constitute a change in the project or change in circumstances that would require additional environmental review; and 4.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of Chief Planner, Sailesh Mehra. B.Zoning Amendment Findings 1.The proposed Zoning Text Amendment is consistent with the adopted General Plan because the Zoning Text Amendment will reinforce the General Plan policies promoting high-density residential development adjacent to transit.With minor revisions as a General Plan Amendment,the Zoning Text Amendment will be consistent with the General Plan.None of the revisions to the Zoning Ordinance will conflict with or impede achievement of any of the goals, policies, or land use designations established in the General Plan. 2.The Zoning Text Amendment applies to property that is entirely suitable in terms of access,size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses,and other considerations as deemed relevant by the Planning Commission and City Council because the proposed revisions will further promote high-density development in close proximity to transit with the provision of community benefits. 3.The proposed Zoning Text Amendment does not change any zoning districts as already identified in the Zoning Ordinance and therefore will not be detrimental to the use of land in any adjacent zone. SECTION II.AMENDMENTS. The City Council hereby makes the findings contained in this Ordinance and amends the sections attached as Exhibit A with additions in double-underline and deletions in strikethrough.Sections and subsections that are not amended by this Ordinance in Exhibit A shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION III.SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional,the remainder of this Ordinance,including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect.To this end,provisions of this Ordinance are severable.The City Council of the City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/3/2018Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:18-251 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:17a. this end,provisions of this Ordinance are severable.The City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby declares that it would have passed each section,subsection,subdivision,paragraph,sentence,clause,or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections,subdivisions,paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable. SECTION IV.PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933,a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney.At least five (5)days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted,the City Clerk shall (1)publish the Summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of this Ordinance.Within fifteen (15)days after the adoption of this Ordinance,the City Clerk shall (1)publish the summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. ******* Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco,held the 28th day of February, 2018. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/3/2018Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Exhibit A Draft Zoning Ordinance to Modify Chapter 20.280: Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District A. Revise Section 20.280.004, Development Standards, to revise the Maximum Density with Incentives in the Downtown Transit Core sub-district. 20.280.004 Development Standards Tables 20.280.004-1 through 3 prescribe the development standards for the Downtown Station Area sub- districts. Additional regulations are denoted in the right-hand column. Section numbers in this column refer to other sections of this title, while individual letters refer to subsections that follow the tables, under Section 20.280.005 “Additional Development Standards.” Table 20.280.004-1 Lot, Density, and FAR Standards - Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Sub-Districts Standard DTC GAC DRC TO/RD LCC LNC Additional Standards Minimum Lot Size (sq. ft.) 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Minimum Lot Width (sq. ft.) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Minimum Lot Depth (sq. ft.) n/a n/a 80 n/a 80 n/a Minimum FAR 2.0 1.5 n/a 1.5 n/a 2.0 Maximum FAR 6.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 n/a 3.0 Exclusive of structure parking Maximum FAR with Incentive Program 8.0 4.0 3.25 (1) 3.5 n/a n/a Exclusive of structured parking Residential Density (units per acre, included within FAR above) Minimum Density 80 14 40 n/a 20.1 40 Maximum Density 100 60 80 n/a 40 60 Maximum Density with Incentive Program. Does not include density bonuses allowed per Chapter 20.390, Bonus Residential Density 120 180 (A) 80 (A) / 100 (2)(A) 100 (A) / 125 (1)(A) n/a n/a 80 (A) Limitations: 1. For qualifying affordable Senior Housing Projects 2. For developments on corner parcels or lots greater than one acre Table 20.280.004-2 Building Form and Location Standards – Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Sub-Districts Standard DTC GAC DRC TO/RD LCC LNC Additional Standards Height (ft) Maximum Building Height 85 45-65 (1)(2) 65 FAA allowed 50 85 See Section 20.300.006 Heights and Height Exceptions Minimum Ground Floor Height for non- residential uses 15; 12 min clearance 15; 12 min clearance 15; 12 min clearance 15; 12 min clearance 15; 12 min clearance 15; 12 min clearance See above and Section 20.280.005(B) (1) Maximum Finished Floor Height (residential) 5 n/a 5 n/a 5 5 See above Yards (ft) Grand Avenue (east and west) Frontage n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a Pedestrian Priority Zone Street Frontage At property line or 10 feet from curb (whichever is greater) n/a At property line or 10 feet from curb (whichever is greater) n/a At property line or 9 feet from curb (whichever is greater) At property line or 9 feet from curb (whichever is greater) Eastern Neighborhood Streets except Grand Avenue Frontage n/a n/a n/a 20 n/a n/a Interior Side 0; 10 when abutting residential district 0 0; 10 when abutting residential district n/a 0 0 Rear 0, 10 when abutting an R district (E) 0 20 (E) 10 for the first two stories, 15 thereafter (C) 0, 10 when abutting an R district (E) 0, 10 when abutting an R district (E) Maximum Lot Coverage 100 100 90 85 75 90 See Ch. 20.040 Rules of Measurement Limitations: 1. Height break would occur a minimum of 30 feet from the front of the building. 2. Corner properties may be exempt from this requirement, subject to evaluation by the decision-making authority in the review process and consistent with the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan design guidelines. Figure 20.280.004-2 Building Height Table 20.280.004-3 Open Space and Landscaping Standards – Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Sub-Districts Standard DTC GAC DRC TO/RD LCC LNC Additional Standards Minimum Usable Open Space (sq. ft. per res. unit) 100 100 100 Refer to Section 20.280.007(K) 100 150 See Supplemental Regulations 20.100.004(D) (10) Minimum Amount of Landscaping (% of site) n/a n/a n/a 15 n/a 10 See Section 20.300.007 Landscaping B. Revise Section 20.280.005(A), DSASP Additional Development Standards, Increased Density and FAR Incentive Program, to include Family-friendly Units as a public benefit: A. Increased Density and FAR Incentive Program. An increase to the maximum FAR or maximum density as referenced in Table 20.280.004-1 may be permitted for buildings with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the City Council through the satisfaction of a combination of the following public benefits: 1. To be eligible for an increase to the maximum FAR or density incentives under this subsection, the public benefits that are included as part of a development project must demonstrate a positive contribution that is above and beyond the minimum required impact fees and other requirements of the particular project. The following preferences for public benefits to the Downtown community and the City may be considered as eligible to allow increased density and FAR standards for a project pursuant to this subsection: a) Local Hire Program; b) Public art; c) Funding or construction of local streetscape enhancements as identified in the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan; d) Funding for enhanced public spaces; e) Funding for public safety facilities, community meeting rooms, child care or similar; f) Tenant space for local businesses or existing businesses in need of relocation; g) Provision of green building measures over and above the applicable green building compliance threshold required pursuant to Title 15 (“Building and Construction”) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code; h) Transit subsidy or other incentives for residents and/or employees; and i) Family-friendly (two- and three-bedroom units); and j) Other developer proposed incentives achieving a similar public benefit. 2. For projects seeking either an increase to the maximum FAR or maximum density pursuant to this subsection, the following shall apply: a) Applicant shall submit financial evaluation and analysis, information, and evidence to allow for a reasonable assessment of the value of the benefits offered relative to the incentives being sought, including the proposed public benefits as outlined above. b) Applicant shall provide an assessment of the economic and/or intrinsic value of the proposed public benefit as compared with the economic value of the proposed development incentives requested by the applicant. The City may request an independent third party review, by a qualified appraisal expert, hired by the City at the applicant’s expense, to validate the valuation submitted by the applicant. This requirement is not intended to imply a need for the applicant to provide or disclose a complete project pro forma. Only the marginal costs of the proposed public benefit and incentive are required to be disclosed in the analysis. c) Applicant shall provide an explanation as to the way in which the proposed amenities will further the City’s goals and objectives as outlined in the SSF Downtown Station Specific Plan, and conformance of the proposed project with the General Plan, Specific Plan provisions and Zoning Ordinance, and that a reasonable nexus exists between the public benefit provided and the incentive granted. City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-237 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:18. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Daniel Avictia v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ9497578 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-238 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:19. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: William Gablin v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ10106114, ADJ10317701, ADJ10828630 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-239 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:20. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Kenneth Hancock v. City of South San Francisco Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case Number: ADJ10367800, ADJ10367798, ADJ10367803 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:18-200 Agenda Date:3/28/2018 Version:1 Item #:21. Closed Session Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9) Significant Exposure to Litigation: One Case City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPEAKER CARD CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPEAKER CARD i'o address the City Council please complete this card and submit it to the City Clerk Speaker comments are limited to three (3) minutes Please indicate which item you'd like to speak on: XPublic Comments, or ) Agenda Item Name: Date: 7 �� Pronounced: Address (optional CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPEAKER CARD To address the City Council please complete this card and submit it to the City Clerk Speaker comments are limited to three (3) minutes Please indicate which item you'd like to speak on: _l)_Public Comments, or 2L_Agenda Item Nam�>--, ._ '1 Date: Pronounced Address (optional To address the City Council, please complete this card and submit it to the City Clerk Speaker comments are limited to three (3) minutes Please un icate which item you'd like to speak on: Lj _Public Comments, or ) dv Q—Agenda Item Name :r t7�U/�i� ,� ate?_ t Pronounced: Address (optional)