Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-11 e-packetSPECIAL MEETING CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 Meeting to be held at: MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 6:00 P.M. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 11th day of September 2002, at 6:00 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda 4. Interview applicants for Library Board 5. Closed Session: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), existing litigation: Aetna Realty v. City of South San Francisco 6. Adjournment City Clerk // City of South San Francisco Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 11, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City Clerk ~.~ CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR LIBRARY BOARD Enclosed are three of the seven applications received for the two Library Board of Trustees vacancies that occurred on June 30, 2002. The vacancies are a result of Boardmember William Boldenweck's first term expiring and Boardmember Eleonor Breite's second-term expiring; both Boardmembers have continued to serve in an interim capacity. Boardmember Boldenweck was first appointed July 1, 1999 and has served one full three-year term and is eligible for reappointment. Boardmember Breite was first appointed September 11, 1996, reappointed July 14, 1999, and, as a result of the adoption of Ordinance No. 1314-2002, is eligible for reappointment to a third term. The schedule for tonight's interviews is as follows: Applicants Time of Interview · Cynthia Smith 6:00 p.m. · Enamari Roque-Vizzini 6:10 p.m. · Joan Marvier 6:20 p.m. Due to the number of applicants to interview for the Library Board, two meeting dates are being scheduled: September 11 and September 25. Originally, there were nine applicants, but two have withdrawn, please refer to attached list. The interview questionnaire is enclosed, and the questions are consistent with those asked by Council at the March 27, 2002 meeting. Also enclosed, for Council's information, are copies of ads that were placed in the San Mateo Times and Peninsula Independent. En c: 1) List of Applicants 2) Applications 3) Council Questions 4) Legal Ads LIBRARY BOARD APPLICANTS Applicants: Interview date: Donna Lee Allard Withdrew application 424 Briarwood September 25 William C. Boldenweck 105 Dunman Way Eleanor J. Breite 3826 Palos Verdes Way September 25 Loretta Brooks Withdrew application 743 Larch Avenue Ann Marie Domm September 25 2666 Sean Court Joan B. Marvier September 11 647 Telford Avenue Margaret Anne Mathes September 25 415 Maple Avenue Cynthia M. Smith September 11 731 Grand Avenue Enamari Roque-Vizzini September 11 126 Alta Loma Drive AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Chair may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. EUGENE R. MULLIN Chairman PEDRO GONZALEZ Vice Chair RAYMOND L. GREEN Boardmember BEVERLY BONALANZA FORD Investment Officer MICHAEL A. WILSON Executive Director JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Boardmember KARYL MATSUMOTO Boardmember SYLVIA M. PAYNE Clerk STEVEN T. MATTAS Counsel PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of the August 14, 2002 regular meeting 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 11, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING 3. Consideration of Precise Plan (P02-0059) for a 8,300 square foot childcare facility on a .6 acre site at 599 Gateway Boulevard; Owner: Boston Properties; Applicant: City of South San Francisco CLOSED SESSION 4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8, real property negotiations related to 178- 190 Airport Boulevard; negotiating party: Redevelopment Agency Assistant Director Van Duyn ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 AGENDA PAGE 2 Redevelopment Agency Staff Repo rt DATE: September 11, 2002 TO: Redevelopment Agency Members FROM: Director of Economic and Community Development SUBJECT: Gateway Childcare Center Design - Precise Plan for an 8,300 square foot child care facility with related playground and site improvements within an existing landscape easement on Lot 1 (west side of Gateway Boulevard, north of Corporate Drive) in the Gateway Specific Plan District in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.57. Address: Applicant: Case No. 599 Gateway Boulevard City of South San Francisco P02-0059 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve Precise Plan P02-0059 based on the attached findings and subject to the attached conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: In 1999, the City issued Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $28 million dollars for Gateway refinancing and related projects. Four million dollars of these funds were set aside for relocation of the CalTrain Station and construction of a childcare facility. In June 2000, the Redevelopment Agency approved a Precise Plan for Boston Properties to construct two office buildings and a parking garage at 611-681 Gateway Boulevard. As part of that approval, Boston Properties agreed to provide to the City an existing landscape strip located along Gateway Boulevard, just south of 601 Gateway Boulevard, for a childcare facility. In June 2002, the Board authorized staff to retain an architectural consultant team to design a childcare facility on the roughly 1.2 acre site. DISCUSSION: Proposal - Staff has been working closely with both the project architect and the YMCA staff to design a childcare facility on the subject site. Initially it was anticipated that the site would accommodate a facility for approximately 60-80 children. However, through cooperative efforts of Staff Report To: Redevelopment Agency RE: Gateway Childcare Facility P02-0059 Date: September 11, 2002 Page 2 the YMCA staff, the project architects and city staff, the current layout of the facility is estimated to accommodate 100-120 children under the age of 5, with 50% of those spaces targeted to infants (under 18 mos.) The facility would be owned by the City and operated by the YMCA. The proposed project includes an approximately 8,300 sq. ft. building, approximately 5,000 sq. ft. of fenced outdoor play area, and additional landscape enhancements within the remaining boundaries of the site. Design -The building consists of two wings, one housing three infant rooms and the other containing the toddler and preschool areas, all of which are visually and physically connected with the outdoor play area. The building is to be of wood frame construction with a cement plaster finish. The dominant architectural feature is a large curved metal roof which provides a substantial overhang over the playground area, allowing for protected outdoor use during inclement weather. The site includes a very significant amount of open space surrounding the confines of the childcare facility. A prominent new landscape berm is proposed along the Gateway frontage which serves to both obscure direct views into the childcare facility from the street and to also provide a playful landscape feature. The Design Review Board discussed the project at its August 20th meeting. While generally pleased with the design the board had the following comments which have been incorporated into the Proposed Conditions of Approval: 1. The color scheme of the building needs additional refinement. Consider brighter accent colors. Also tie in playground fence color with overall color scheme. 2. Consider redesigning the windows or modifying panel detailing to add interest to western elevation. 3. Double-check landscape plan to ensure that ginkgo biloba trees will survive given the high water table and salty condition of the soil. 4. Ensure that the design of the play areas meet ADA and CPSC. The project was also referred to the Gateway Architectural Controls Committee which has review authority over all new structures and signs within the Gateway area. The Committee has provided the attached letter noting its approval of the design. Zoning Consistency- Use - While the Gateway Specific Plan District does not expressly call out "childcare" as a permitted use in the zone district, SSFMC Section 20.57.200 (h) allows for "Other uses similar to permitted uses" on the site. In addition to the standard primary use types permitted in the Gateway area, including office, research and development, hotels and light industrial uses, other permitted uses include various types of ancillary uses including retail shops, convenience stores, personal service establishments, athletic clubs, banks, etc., designed to serve the primary Staff Report To: Redevelopment Agency RE: Gateway Childcare Facility P02-0059 Date: September 11, 2002 Page 3 uses within the area. As childcare facilities serve a similar purpose in providing needed services within a business park, the use is found to be consistent with SSFMC Section 20.57.200 (h). General Development Standards - The proposed project meets the minimum development standards of the Gateway Specific Plan District as shown below: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Gateway Requirements Proposed Project Floor Area Ratio 1.25 maximum .16 Height 250 feet maximum 17.5 feet Lot Coverage 50% maximum 16% Setbacks Building - 40 min. from any street 40 ft. from Gateway Parking 1 per 5 children 20 General Plan/Redevelopment Plan The General Plan designates the Gateway area as Business Commercial, a category encompassing business and professional offices, visitor services, retail and related services. The proposed childcare facility is consistent with this designation. In addition, the use is consistent with General Plan Policy 2-1-12 which seeks to promote childcare centers in all land use districts and with Policy 6-1-10 which encourages the establishment of"industry clusters" in the city by providing common services, including childcare, to multiple businesses in a common setting. The subject site is presently encumbered by a private landscape easement. The easement was required by the City in order to provide a mechanism that would permit the funding of the landscape improvements by the Gateway Assessment District bonds, which are still being paid by the various property owners within the district. As a condition of approval, this easement must be vacated prior to issuance of any building permits on the site. Staff is currently pursuing this abandonment with Boston Properties. Subject to deletion of this easement, the proposed use at this site is consistent with both the Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) and the redevelopment plan. Environmental Determination In June 2000, the Redevelopment Agency certified Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-00-020 for the Boston Properties development which included analysis of development of a single story retail facility on this site. Staffhas determined that this previous environmental analysis which details potential impacts and includes mitigation measures to reduce identified impacts to a less Staff Report To: Redevelopment Agency RE: Gateway Childcare Facility P02-0059 Date: September 11, 2002 Page 4 than significant level, adequately addresses the potential impacts of this project and that no additional environmental analysis is necessary. The proposed project will be required to comply with all mitigation measures. Next Steps - Subject to the Redevelopment Agency's endorsement of the project design, the architectural team will continue to refine project plans and cost estimates over the next several months. It is anticipated that the project should be out to bid in February/March. Subsequently, the recommended bid will be forwarded to the Board for acceptance. Additionally, staff will be working with the YMCA on a lease and maintenance agreement that will be forwarded to the Board for review and approval. The targeted date for project completion is December 22, 2003, which would allow the facility to open in January 2004. CONCLUSION: The proposed project is consistent with all the relevant planning related documents including the East of 101 Area Plan, the Gateway Specific Plan District requirements, the Redevelopment Plan and the Owner Participation Agreement. Therefore, based on the attached findings and subject to the attached conditions of approval, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency approve P02-0059. ~C~~mr e°nftEc°n°mic Approved: /" '':~ ' '/ · Michael A. Wilson City Manager MAW:MVD:sk ATTACHMENTS: Draft Findings of Approval Draft Conditions of Approval Letter from Gateway Architectural Controls Committee Plans & Photos PROPOSED FINDINGS OF APPROVAL P02-0059 (September 11, 2002 Redevelopment Agency Meeting) As required by the "Precise Plan Procedure for Implementation of Specific Plan" (SSFMC Section 20.57.590), the following findings are made in support of the Precise Plan for an 8,300 square foot child care facility with related playground and site improvements within an existing landscape easement on Lot 1 (west side of Gateway Boulevard, north of Corporate Drive) at 599 Gateway Boulevard, in the Gateway Specific Plan District Zone. These findings are based on public testimony and materials submitted to the South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency which include, but are not limited to: plans dated August 9, 2002 prepared by StarkweatherBondy Architecture; minutes of the August 20, 2002 Design Review Board meeting; Redevelopment Agency staff report dated September 11, 2002; and public testimony received at the Redevelopment Agency hearing of September 11, 2002. The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan which designates this site "Business Commercial", a category encompassing business and professional offices, visitor services, retail and related services. The proposed childcare facility is consistent with this designation. In addition, the use is consistent with General Plan Policy 2-I-12 which seeks to promote childcare centers in all land use districts and with Policy 6-1-10 which encourages the establishment of "industry clusters" in the city by providing common services, including childcare, to multiple businesses in a common setting. The proposed project is compatible with the intent and purpose of the Gateway Specific Plan. The plan calls for the coordinated development of property in the District. While the Gateway Specific Plan District does not expressly call out "childcare" as a permitted use in the zone district, SSFMC Section 20.57.200 (h) allows for "Other uses similar to permitted uses" on the site. In addition to the standard primary use types permitted in the Gateway area, including office, research and development, hotels and light industrial uses, other permitted uses include various types of ancillary uses including retail shops, convenience stores, personal service establishments, athletic clubs, banks, etc., designed to serve the primary uses within the area. As childcare facilities serve a similar purpose in providing needed services within a business park, the use is found to be consistent with SSFMC Section 20.57.200 (h). 3. The proposed project meets all development standards of the Gateway Specific Plan District. Subject to deletion of the existing landscape easement which presently encumbers the site, the proposed use at this site is consistent with both the Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) and the redevelopment plan. The proposed project is consistent with the redevelopment plan and with the Owner Participation Agreement. Service uses ancillary to office development, such as childcare, are consistent with both the OPA and the Redevelopment Plan. In June 2000, the Redevelopment Agency certified Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-00- 020 for the Boston Properties development which included analysis of development of a single story retail facility on this site. This previous environmental analysis which details potential impacts and includes mitigation measures to reduce identified impacts to a less than significant level, adequately addresses the potential impacts of this project; no additional environmental analysis is necessary. The proposed project will be required to comply with all mitigation measures. PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P02-0059 (September 11, 2002 Redevelopment Agency Meeting) Ae o Planning Division requirements shall be as follow: The project shall be constructed substantially as indicated on the attached plans dated August 9, 2002, prepared by StarkweatherBondy Architecture, except as otherwise modified by the following conditions: Plans shall be modified to address the following comments noted by the City's Design Review Board: The color scheme of the building needs additional refinement. Consider brighter accent colors. Also tie in playground fence color with overall color scheme. Consider redesigning the windows or modifying panel detailing to add interest to western elevation. Double-check landscape plan to ensure that ginkgo biloba trees will survive given the high water table and salty condition of the soil. Ensure that the design of the play areas meet ADA and CPSC. The applicant/property owner shall participate in the shuttle service program currently operating within the Gateway Project which provides service to and from the CalTrain and BART Stations and is available to all employees in the project area. The applicant shall cooperate with the City in the development/implementation of a regional shuttle service if such is considered by the City. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures outlined in Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-00-020. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permits, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan for review and approval by the Chief Planner and Chief of Police. Any signs shall require a separate permit. Final landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for staff review and approval prior to submittal for a building permit. The applicant shall comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. (Planning Division Contact: Susy Kalkin (650) 877-8535) B. Engineering Division requirements shall be as follow: 1. The applicant shall comply with the applicable conditions of the Engineering Division's "Standard Conditions for Commercial and Industrial Developments", consisting of 5 pages. Proposed Conditions of Approval P02-0059 (Gateway Childcare) September 11, 2002 Page 2 of 5 o These conditions are contained in the Engineering Division's "Standard Conditions for Subdivisions and Private Developments" booklet, dated January 1998. As required by City Ordinance, new storm water pollution control devices and filters shall be installed within the site drainage system, as necessary to prevent pollutants deposited within the site from entering the public storm drainage system. Plans for these facilities shall be designed by the project's civil engineer and submitted to the City's Engineering and Water Quality Control Divisions for review and approval. The property on which the childcare facility is proposed to be constructed is burdened by a private landscape easement. The easement was required by the City in order to provide a mechanism that would permit the funding of the landscape improvements by the Gateway Assessment District bonds, which are still being paid by the various property owners within the district. The applicant shall submit documentation that the portion of the landscape easement on which the childcare center is to be constructed has been vacated by its "owners". The drop-off curb cutout appears only useful for vehicles leaving the site. We recommend that additional drop-off spaces (or passenger loading zones) be provided within the adjacent parking lot for use by parents who work at the adjacent offices. The drop-off area on the exit driveway should be painted white and posted as a passenger-loading zone, to keep vehicles from parking in these spaces. EAST OF 101 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the proposed project, the applicant shall pay the East of 101 Traffic Impact fee, as adopted by the City Council at their meeting of September 26, 2001. Fee Calculation (as of August 2002) 8,300 SF gsf Commercial building @ $6.25 per each square foot (this amount is subject to increases due to inflation and increases resulting from the need for additional traffic improvements, as approved by the City Council) = $ 51,875 (Note: Staffis in the process of preparing an update of the East of 101 Traffic Impact Fees for City Council consideration, which includes a recommendation to eliminate traffic impact fees for childcare facilities in the East of 101 Area.) SEWER SYSTEM CAPACITY STUDY AND IMPROVEMENT FEE The City of South San Francisco has identified the need to investigate the condition and capacity of the sewer system within the East of 101 area, downstream of the proposed Proposed Conditions of Approval P02-0059 (Gateway Childcare) September 11, 2002 Page 3 of 5 childcare development. Much of the existing sewer collection system within the East of 101 area was originally designed many years ago to accommodate warehouse and industrial use and is now proposed to accommodate uses, such as offices and biotech facilities, with a much greater sewage flow. These additional flows, plus groundwater infiltration into the existing sewers, due to ground settlement and the age of the system, have resulted in pumping and collection capacity constraints. A study and flow model is proposed to analyze the problem and recommend solutions and improvements. The applicant shall financially participate in evaluating the existing components and projected flow rates of the City of South San Francisco's existing east of 101 sanitary sewer collection system, at the direction of the City Engineer. If additional capacity is needed, the applicant agrees to pay their fair share of the cost of improvements to the down-stream pumping and gravity sewer collection facilities. The applicant also agrees, that when the City of South San Francisco develops a sewer collection model which will identify, prioritize and correct said problems and will determine the location of capacity restrictions and other structural problems within the collection facilities, the applicant agrees to pay its fair share contribution to the cost of the model and any needed infrastructure improvements, in accordance with a schedule established by the City's Department of Public Works, pursuant to a resolution of the South San Francisco City Council. The fee is estimated to be a minimum of a $1.23 per square foot of new building area, in 2002 dollars. For the proposed project, if paid this year, the fee would beat least: 8,300 SF times $1.23 = $10,209. The sewer contribution shall be due and payable prior to receiving a building permit for the proposed building. The fee will be subject to periodic increases, as approved by the City Council. 7. OYSTER POINT OVERPASS FEE The Oyster Point Overpass Fee was pre-paid by the original developer for a specified amount of traffic. This project will not trigger additional payment, but future development within the area will likely do so. (Engineering Division contact: Richard Harmon (650) 829-6652) C. Police Department requirements shall be as follow: 1. Standard Conditions The developer shall comply with the applicable requirements of Chapter 15.48 of the Municipal Code, "Minimum Building Security Standards" Ordinance, specifically, "Lighting". a. Lighting: Proposed Conditions of Approval P02-0059 (Gateway Childcare) September 11, 2002 Page 4 of 5 1) Parking lots, (including parking lots with carports) driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with high intensiW discharge lighting with sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of business darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on site. Such lighting shall be equipped with vandal-resistant covers. A lighting level of .50 to 1 foot- candles minimum, maintained at ground level is required. 2) All exterior doors shall be provided with their own light source and shall be adequately illuminated at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. 3) The premises, while closed for business after dark, must be sufficiently lighted by use of interior night-lights. 4) Exterior door, perimeter, parking area, and canopy lights shall be controlled by photocell and shall be left on during hours of darkness or diminished lighting. 5) Parking lot lights shall remain on anytime there are employees in the building. 6) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. Lighting plans shall include photometric and distribution data attesting to the required illumination level. 7) The lighting plan, as described above, shall depict the lighting levels and light standard/bollard locations throughout the site: including the lawn, play equipment area, and the open play area. The Police Department reserves the right to make additional security and safety conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed/revised building plans. Based on the childcare nature of this proposed plan site applicant, the Police Department requires that the applicant/operator meet with Department staff at the appropriate time to discuss security and safety conditions related to their 'day to day' operations. (Police Department contact, Sergeant Mike Newell (650) 877-8927) Proposed Conditions of Approval P02-0059 (Gateway Childcare) September 11, 2002 Page 5 of 5 D. Water Quality Control Department requirements shall be as follow: Any new onsite catch basins shall be stenciled with the approved San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Logo. o In accordance with the Municipal Code and Federal law, new stormwater pollution control devices stormceptor/CDS units are to be installed in any new drainage inlets. In addition, the applicant is required to submit a maintenance schedule for the stormceptor/CDS Units to the Environmental Coordinator. 3. That the applicant shall pay a Sewer Connection Fee based on water usage.. 4. Separate water meters shall be provided for landscaping and building. An Erosion Control Plan with winterization controls shall be submitted to Water Quality prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. Additional comments shall be provided when building plans received. Water Quality Control contact Ray Honan: (650) 877-8634 Hines August 30, 2002 Ms. Susy Kalkin, Principal Planner City of South San Francisco Planning Division P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Proposed Childcare Facility at Gateway Commons RECEIVED PLANNING Dear Susy: This letter serves to inform the City of South San Francisco that the Architectural Control Committee of the Gateway Property Owners' Association, in accordance with Section 6.2 of the Association Bylaws, has approved the proposed childcare center plans prepared by StarkweatherBondy and dated August 9, 2002. We are satisfied that the following issues have been considered and addressed as follows: 1. The combination of the "caterpillar" landscaped berm and mesh fence will prevent strangers from directly observing individual children from the sidewalk. 2. The play areas to the south and outside of the fenced-in area are not part of the daily childcare center operation. Rather, those areas are for public use. 3. The color of the roof is closer to a metallic grey rather than a metallic blue. 4. Signage and color of the exterior wall are still under design. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. / Architectural Control Committee cc:Lisa Lewis Hanns Lee AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUll .DING COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Mayor may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. PEDRO GONZALEZ Mayor Pro Tem EUGENE R. MULLIN Mayor JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Councilman RAYMOND L. GREEN Councilman KARYL MATSUMOTO Councilwoman BEVERLY BONALANZA FORD City Treasurer SYLVIA M. PAYNE City Clerk MICHAEL A. WILSON City Manager STEVEN T. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROI J J CALL · Moment of silence - in memory of victims of September 11, 2001 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS · Day in the Park 2002 Update - Ms. Judy Bush · Introduction of new City employees AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Community Forum · Subcommittee Reports · Positive Attendance Program - Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of the August 14 and 21, special meetings and August 14, 2002 regular meeting 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 11, 2002 3. Resolution designating the Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services as administrator for six licensed childcare facilities operated by the City of South San Francisco 4. Motion to accept Police Department HVAC Replacement Project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications 5. Resolution awarding construction contract to G. Bortolotto & Co., Inc. for the Mission Road Resurfacing Project in an amount not to exceed $135,976.94 6. Motion to accept the dedication of a sanitary sewer and storm drain easement as offered on Parcel Map No. 00-060, Lands of Hines at Bay West Cove 7. Resolution authorizing the execution of agreement between the City/County Association of Governments and the City of South San Francisco to participate in the Revenue Aligned Budget Authority for street pavement activities REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 PAGE 2 o Motion to accept the Chestnut Avenue at E1 Camino Real Right Turn Lane Project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications o Resolution approving and authorizing execution of second amended joint powers agreement between the City of South San Francisco and other agencies within the County of San Mateo for the purpose of establishing a joint telecommunications regulator and public utility franchise negotiation structure 10. Resolution amending list of designated positions for the Conflict of Interest Code 11. Resolution accepting $128,573 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Partnership's Community Health Initiative LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS 12. Motion to waive reading and introduce an ordinance amending SSFMC Chapter 11, to establish preferential parking areas, and resolution approving a preferential permit parking area for residential property near the South San Francisco BART station ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 AGENDA PAGE 3 Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 11, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services A Resolution Designating the Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services as Administrator for Six Licensed Childcare Facilities RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution designating Barry Nagel, Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services, as administrator for the six (6) licensed childcare facilities operated by the City of South San Francisco. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION As the Council is aware, childcare for preschool and elementary school age children is regulated by the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. The Department of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services operates two (2) licensed Preschools located at Westborough and Siebecker Center, and four (4) licensed After School Recreation Programs located at Martin Elementary School, Monte Verde Elementary School, Ponderosa Elementary School and Spruce Elementary School. Currently, the licensed programs have a combined daily capacity for over 250 children. Staff is in the process of increasing capacity at two (2) facilities, Westborough Preschool (from 17 to 35 children per day) and Monte Verde After School Recreation Program (from 30 to 60 children per day). As a result, it is necessary to update the city's information with the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing as the former Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services is listed as administrator for two of the six licensed facilities. Adoption of the attached resolution will bring the city into compliance with the state's regulations for childcare facilities. ""-~reo(or of Parks~eation and Maintenance Services Attachment: Resolution Approved: Michael A. Wilson City Manager RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BARRY NAGEL, DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SIX (6) LICENSED CHILDCARE FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco operates two full-day licensed preschools and four licensed after school recreation programs at Westborough Preschool, 2380 Galway Drive; Siebecker Preschool, 510 Elm Court; Martin School, 35 School Street; Ponderosa School, 295 Ponderosa Road; Spruce School, 501 Spruce Avenue and Monte Verde Elementary School, 2551 St. Cloud Drive, San Bruno; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to take any and all actions necessary to operate licensed child care facilities at these locations, including but not limited to applying for increase in capacity for those licensed facilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby designates Barry Nagel, Director of Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Services to act on behalf of the City of South San Francisco regarding the six facilities. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: DATE: TO: FROM: September 11, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Police Department HVAC Replacement Project Engineering File PB-00-8, Project No. 51-13232-0022, Bid No. 2316 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept Police Department HVAC Replacement Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This project replaced 6 of the existing deteriorated HVAC units and added 1 new unit for the Police Department portion of the Municipal Services Building (MSB). The new units with other minor modifications will improve the airflow and temperature control in the Police Department. The project has been inspected by City staff and is completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Acceptance of the project will provide authorization for staff to file a Notice of Completion and to release the payment performance bond and ten percent retention at the end of the thirty-day lien period. FUNDING: The construction was completed at a cost of $147,200.00 ($118,400.00 bid items and $28,800.00 for one change order). The change order covered costs involved in replacing non- working exhaust fans and associated deteriorated ductwork on the roof of the MSB and installing a backup HVAC unit for the computer room. Construction costs are budgeted in the 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Fund. JD~c~lrbob~ Public Works Approved: ~/~"~/~//~ Michael A. Wilson City Manager RTH:/G:'uPROJECTS'tPB-00-8 \Staff Report Acceptance.doc DATE: September 11, 2002 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: MISSION ROAD RESURFACING PROJECT: ENGINEERING FILE NO. 51-13231-0305; PROJECT NO. ST-02-3, BID NO. 2325 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding the construction contract for the Mission Road Resurfacing Project, Base Bid and Alternate Bid No. 1, to G. Bortolotto & Co., Inc., of San Carlos, California, in the amount of $135,976.94. BACKGROUND: This project will provide installation of new asphalt concrete resurfacing on Mission Road to improve the existing road surface and to mod/fy the traffic flow for the new BART Station and McClellan Extension. The City of South San Francisco advertised the subject project and opened bids on September 3, 2002. Included in this bid is Bid Alternate No. 1, concrete modification work to improve the driveways, curb & gutter and sidewalk at E1 Camino High School. The following are the bid results: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT G. Bortolotto Co., Inc. San Carlos, CA $135,976.94 Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. South San Francisco, CA. $165,902.95 Granite Rock/Pavex Construction, Company Redwood City, CA. $175,541.55 Staff Report To: Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Mission Road Resurfacing Project September 11, 2002 Page: 2 of 3 CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT O'Grady Paving, Inc. Mountain View, CA. $182,744.50 C. F. Archibald Paving, Inc. San Francisco, CA. $199,659.40 Ghilotti Bros., Inc. San Rafael, CA $ 217,928.25 G. Bortolotto Co., Inc. has worked with the City on previous projects. Staff has reviewed their qualifications and references and found them to be satisfactory. The time allotted for this project is 25 working days. Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to G. Bortolotto Co., Inc. in the amount of $135,976.94. The following is a cost breakdown for the project budget: Construction 10% Contingency Administration/Inspection $ 135,976.94 $ 13,600.00 $ 25,000.00 Total $ 174,576.94 FUNDING: Before the construction of the BART facility, the City and BART surveyed the roadway and agreed to an initial pavement condition survey. Based on this survey, BART committed to reimburse the City of South San Francisco for the calculated difference in the initial pavement condition survey and the current pavement condition survey. BART is to provide payment to the City of South San Francisco per the original Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to cover a portion of this project. The balance of revenue is to come from Measure A Funds. Staff Report roi Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Mission Road Resurfacing Project September 11, 2002 Page: 3 of 3 Sufficient funds are available for this project and they are included in the City of South San Francisco's 2002 - 2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). John Gibb~ Dire¢_tor oI~ Publ. io-W~rks Approved: ~~_~/~ Michael A. Wilson City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Location Map RD/JG/ed RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE MISSION ROAD RESURFACING PROJECT TO G. BORTOLOTI'O & CO., INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ,ql ,q&976.94 WHEREAS, the City desires to award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, G. Bortolotto & Co., Inc. for the Mission Road Resurfacing Project; and WHEREAS, Measure A funds are available for this project and is included in the City of South San Francisco's 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Program. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby awards the construction contract for the Mission Road Resurfacing Project to G. Bortolotto & Co., Inc. in an amount not to exceed $135,976.94. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk F:\file cabinet\Current Reso's'a~ission.rd.resurfacing.res.doc EL CAMINO HIGH SCHOOL / / / / /, LOCATION MAP DATE: September 11, 2002 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 00-060, EASTERLY PORTION OF BAY WEST COVE HINES HOLDINGS, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the offer of dedication for a sanitary sewer easement and a storm drain easement as shown on Parcel Map 00-060. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, on September 26, 2001, approved a modified Precise Plan for the southwesterly portion of the Bay West Cove site. This modified plan requires the relocation of an existing storm drain culvert and a sanitary sewer force main around the footprint of one of the proposed buildings at the site. The subject map dedicates the easement that is necessary to relocate these facilities. To complete the process, the applicant will have to request that the City abandon or quitclaim the portion of our existing easement that will be under the new building prior to receiving a building permit for the structure. The recommended motion will accept the easement dedication as offered by the subdivider on the map. The easement to be dedicated is highlighted on the attached copy of the parcel map. By: k,....~j~, !IL~ i,~ J~h-~n G~bbs Directo~ of Public Works Michael A. Wilson City Manager ATTACHMENT: Parcel Map OWNER'S STATEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED, HMS OYSTER POINT, L.L.C. WHO ACQUIRED TITLE UNDER THE NAME OF HINES O~STER POINT, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DOES HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE OWNERS OR HAVE SOME RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED I~THIN THE DIST1NCTIVI~ BOUNDARY SHOWN UPON THE HEREIN EMBODIED MAP ENTITLED *PARCEL MAP 00-060, iN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BEING A SUBDIV)SION QF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 97-027 FILED: JANUARY 22. 1998 BK. 70 PM PGS. 33-A0 COUNTY 0E SAN MATED. STATE OF CALIFORNIA", BY V~RTUE OF THE GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 19, 2000. AS RECORDER'S SERIES NO. 2000-059651, AND RE-RECORDED OCTOBER 2. 2000 AS RECORDER'S SERIES NO. 2000-123116. ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN MATED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CONSISTING OF TWO (2) SHEETS, THIS STATEMENT BEING UPON SHEET ONE (1) THEREOF; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID REAL PROPERTY; THAT THIS MAP SHOWS OR NOTES ALL EASEMENTS, EXISTING OR OF RECORD. W1THIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE HEREIN EMBODIED MAP, AND THAT WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF THIS PARCEL MAP 1. WE DEDICATE TO THE OITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND MAINTENANCE THEREOF, ALL THOSE AREAS SHOWN AS "SSE & SDE" (SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND STORM DRAIN EASEMENT) IN W1TNESS THEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HAND THE DATE HEREUNDER WRITTEN. HMS OYSTER POINT. LLC. A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: HINES INTERESTS LIMitED PARTHERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. ITS MANAGING MEMBER BY: HINES HOLDINGS. INC., A CORPORATION y: ..... ~'~ ATED: OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA S.S. ~¢' PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR [ [ ] PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EV1DENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) tS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE ~THIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(lES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEiR S~GNATURE(S) ON THE ~NS~UMENT END~ UP~ BEHALF ~ ~ICH ~E PERSON(S), AC~D, EXECUTED ~E INSTRUMENT ~ESS MY HAND CHestY NAME OF NOTARY SOILS REPORT STATEMENT A GOETECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY FOR BAY WEST COVE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA AND REPORT WAS PREPARED BY GEOMATRiX CONSULTANTS lNG. DATED NOVE~MBER 7. 2000, PROJECT NO. 6277.001, SIGNED BY MARK FREtTAS, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER AND CYNTHIA ROAN, P.E., G.E., PRINCIPAL ENGINEER. SAID REPORT iS ON FILE WITH THE C~TY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BASIS OF BEARING THE BEARING OF NORTH 02'25'59" WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF GATEWAY BLVD. AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP GATEWAY CENTER FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTCBER 1ST, 1982 IN BOOK 107 OF MAPS AT PAGE(S) 27-30, SAN MATED COUNTY RECORDS AND AS SHOWN HEREON, WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT]ON AND IS BASED UPON A F1ELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WtTH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF HINES OYSTER POINT, LLC. A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. I ALSO STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER SHOWN. AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED MICHAEL O. FOLEY DATED CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE NO. 5777 MY LICENSE EXPIRES: JUNE 50, 2004 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION AS SBO~N HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THAT ALL THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA "SUBDIVISION MAP ACT' AND OF ANY LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTA~VE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED W1TH BARBARA HA~qNS, CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. 58985 MY LICENSE EXPIRES: J~JNE 30. 2005 DATED: ................ Z: ~DRAW~A00529~A00529- 4~AO05Bg-4 -Em,dwg 7-31-02 15:39~45 TECHNICAL REVIEWER'S STATEMENT THIS PARCEL MAP HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE TECHNICALLY CORRECT AND CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. HUGH I~] ~TON. ES. 3918 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR MY LICENSE EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2004 CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I. SYLVIA PAYNE, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATED COUNTY CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BY A MOTiON ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF SAID COUNCL HELD ON THE .... DAY OF _____ 200_, DID ACCEPT THE OFFERED DEDICATION. NUMBER 1 AS NOTED IN THE OWNER'S STATEMENT. FOR PUBUC USE. DATED: _ SYLVIA PAYNE. CITY CLERK CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCgSCO. CALIFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT: BLED THIS DAY OF 200__ AT IN BOOK -- OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES -- THROUGH, INCLUSIVE. AT THE REQUEST OF SYL~A PAYNE, Clef CLERK OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. FILE NO. ~E: __ WARREN SLOCUM. COUNTY RECORDER COUNTY OF SAN MATED, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY: DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER PARCEL MAP 00-060 IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO, 97-027 FILED: JANUARY 22, 1998 BK. 70 PM POS, 35-40 COUNTY OF SAN MATED STALE O~ CAUFORNIA tKIER & WRIGHT JOB: NC) ~00529 4 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS { Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 12, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Public Works Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for FY 2002-2003 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Heating and adopt a resolution establishing Stormwater Management Program charges for the 2002-2003 fiscal year, It is also recommended that Council adopt the Finance Director's Report of FY 2002-2003 Stormwater Management Service Fees. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Introduction The 2002-2003 Fiscal Year marks the tenth year of South San Francisco's participation in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program mandated by Federal and State Governments. The current program fee structure was adopted by Council on July 19, 1995, and represents an equitable distribution of costs taking into consideration the size and use of the parcel, and the estimated amount of stormwater runoff generated by the parcel. This fee calculation strategy is similar to the process used by other stormwater management programs, including the San Mateo County General Program. By direction of the City Council, stormwater program charges are to be adjusted so as not to exceed actual program expenses. The proposed stormwater program charges herein were developed in response to Council's direction and are the same charges as the prior year. Regulations The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandated local government to control and reduce stormwater pollution runoff. The framework for regulating stormwater discharges is through a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES). The permit is implemented and enforced by the State Water Resources Control Board through its regional agency. · Staff Report To: Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 June 12, 2002 Page: 2 of 4 South San Francisco, in cooperation with the other jurisdictions in San Mateo County, jointly reapplied for their Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit on March 18, 1998. A requirement of the NPDES permit was the development of a five-year action plan known as the Stormwater Management Plan. The Plan covers the period from July 1998 through June 2003 to prevent and control stormwater pollution in San Mateo County. STOPPP's initial Stormwater Management Plan covered the previous five-year period. The Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) contains two-year work plans with budgets that describe in more detail how the General Program's portion of the five-year SWMP will be completed. The two-year work plans and budgets will be updated annually to include the subsequent fiscal year and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) each March. The SWMP also contains detailed performance standards that identify what each of the member agencies is committed to do to control stormwater pollutants from the storm drains and conveyance systems that it owns and/or operates. STOPPP will review these performance standards every two years and revise them as needed. New and modified performance standards will be incorporated following the approval process described in the reissued NPDES permit. Examples of General Program responsibilities include: · Coordinating the overall program efforts; · Submitting consolidated quarterly, semi-annually, and annual reports to the Regional Water Quality Control Board; · Develop and sponsor training workshops; · Develop educational/informational materials for dissemination within jurisdictions. Examples of City Specific Program activities include: · Street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, and other maintenance-related activities that may have an impact on stormwater quality; · To minimize or eliminate potential stormwater pollution sources at commercial and industrial facilities through inspection and educational outreach activities, and to effectively prohibit illicit discharges (such as oil, paint, or soapy washwater) to the municipalities' storm drain systems; · Educating the public about the differences between the sanitary sewer and storm drain systems and the causes of stormwater pollution in order to encourage residents to adopt less polluting and more environmentally beneficial practices; Staff Report To~ Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 June 12, 2002 Page: 3 of 4 · Prohibiting non-stormwater discharges from construction sites, reducing stormwater pollutant discharges from new development and construction activities to the maximum extent practicable, and requiring compliance with stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) and erosion/sedimentation control at construction sites; · Identifying effective BMP's and developing tools and analyzing information needed to identify and help solve creek drainage basin-specific water quality and beneficial use impairment problems. Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Program Accomplishments Some of South San Francisco's 2001-2002 Program accomplishments are listed below: · Responded to 35 various spills or illicit discharges (i.e. paint, oil, fuel, or concrete materials) that could enter into the storm drains; · Reviewed several building and construction plans and prepared written comments requesting incorporation of stormwater pollution prevention measures and post construction measures; · S SF Staff participated with the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Program in staffing the booth at the San Mateo County Fair which was held August 2001; · On September 15, 2001, the City of South San Francisco's Stormwater Program along with the City of South San Francisco beautification committee co-sponsored a creek clean-Up Event at a new location, comer of Littlefield and Utah Avenues. Approximately forty people from our community, including staff, for two hours picked up trash and debris that would wind up in the bay. This was a low turnout due to the event of September 1 lth. · On April 22, 2002, the Environmental Staff participated in the Bay area Earth Day Event. Staff held a Mercury Thermometer Exchange at the Municipal Services Building. From 11: am to 2: pm staff exchanged approximately 125 mercury for a NexTemp Personal Reusable Oral thermometer. Staff plans to hold an event at Genentech sometime in July or August 2002. · The Office of Environmental Compliance is continuing its School Outreach Program to the 34th grade students. Staff Report To: Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 June 12, 2002 Page: 4 of 4 SUMMARY The proposed program budget for fiscal Year 2002-2003 is $471,113. Funding will be provided from program service fees and carry-over funds from the previous fiscal year. A breakdown of programs' fees according to classification type can be seen in Exhibit A. This assessment can be collected by the San Mateo County Assessor via property tax billings as in the previous year. The deadline to place the stormwater program assessment on the tax rolls is August 5, 2002. BY: John Gil~oS'-2 Directo~of Pub~i~ Works Approved: /w~~ .~~ Michael A. Wilson City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Approving Stormwater Management Service Charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Exhibit "A" Program Fees Resolution adopting Report of Stormwater Management Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Report of Stormwater Management Services Charges for 2002-03 RI-I/JG/ed RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SERVICE CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 14.04 enables the City to levy charges for the local portion of the San Mateo County Stormwater Management Program; and WHEREAS, notices were published and a public heating was held on June 12, 2002 as required for the enactment of the subject stormwater fees; and WHEREAS, funding for the local program requires $477,614; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Service Charges are maintained at the level established in Fiscal Year 1997-98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco as follows: 1. The City Council hereby confirms the Stormwater Management Service Charge formula attached hereto as Exhibit A, for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the __ day of ,2002 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: F:~fle cabinet\Current Reso's\6-122002resol. FEE.doc ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSED CHARGES FOR 2002-2003 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEES PARCEL SIZE ) BASE THRESHOLD x (sq. footage) (average sq. ft. of single family dwelling ) [ number ofEDUs ] EDU = ANNUAL RATE SERVICE (per class) FEE Sample Fees per Classification: Type of Parcels Annual Rate Single Family Residential 5,400 sq.ft. ) 5,352 sq.ft. (base) [1 EDU ] x $8.72 = $ 8.72 II. Multi-Family Residential 10,700 sq.ft. ) 5,352 sq. ft. (base) x $17.42 [2 EDUs ] $ 34.84 IIL Commercial/Industrial (a) 20,000 sq.ft. ) 5,352 sq. ft. (base) x $17.86 [3.73 EDUs ] $ 66.74 (b) 43,560 sq.ft.(1 acre) ) 5,352 sq. ft. (base) x $17.86 = $145.36 [8.13 EDUs ] IV. Vacant 10,000 sq.ft. ) 5,352 sq. ft. (base) x $1.74 --- $ 3.26 [2 EDUs ] Parking Lots 10,000 sq.ft ) 5,352 sq. ft. (base) x $26.14 = [2 EDUs $ 48.84 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REPORT OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 PURSUANT TO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 14.04.110 WHEREAS, the City Council has given notice and on June 12, 2002, held a public hearing as required by law on the subject stormwater rates; and WHEREAS, the rates imposed and reflected in the Report of Stormwater Management Services Fee for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 are the same as the unit rates imposed in Fiscal Year 2001- 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, by a minimum two-thirds vote, hereby adopts the Report of Stormwater Management Services Fee for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, and directs that the rates so established shall be collected on the official tax assessment roll, together with real property taxes, and that the amount shall constitute liens upon the properties which shall be effective at the same time and to the same extent as is provided for by law in the case of real property taxes, with like penalties for delinquencies. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the .~ day of ., 2002 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: F:Xfile cabinet\Current Reso's\6-122002stormfeesresol.doc ATTEST: City Clerk REPORT OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SERVICES CHARGES FOR 2002-2003 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 14.04 OF TIlE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE In accordance with Chapter 14.04 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, the following report prepared as of May 22, 2002 is submitted. This report describes the procedure for charging those parcels of real property, which receive benefits of stormwater system services, and the amount of the annual charge, which will be imposed against each parcel for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. 1. Summary of Charges All single-family residential properties $121,777 All multi-family residential properties (Including duplexes) $ 56,565 All commercial/industrial $204,076 Parking lots $ 11,064 Vacant $ 4,033 Total $397,515 This report refers to and incorporates by reference the report entitled "Notice of Proposed City of South San Francisco Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure" for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 prepared by and on file in the Office of the Environmental Compliance Coordinator. That report summarizes the 2002-2003 charges that will be proposed by the City Council on June 12, 2002. Upon adoption of the proposed charges, or amendments thereto, a report entitled "City of South San Francisco Storrnwater System Charges," prepared by Engineering Data Services, Los Altos,' California will be completed; it will describe the amount of annual charge imposed against each parcel, by Assessor's Parcel Number, for fiscal year 2002-2003. All of these documents, including this report, shall be filed with the County Tax Collector or Auditor. Accompanying the filing of this report, shall be the Clerk's endorsement that the report has been duly adopted by the City Council. Dated: J. Steele Director of Finance CLERK'S STATEMENT I, Sylvia M. Payne, City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation, do hereby certify that the foregoing report was adopted by the City Council on the ~ day of ,2002 by Resolution No. ~ StaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 11, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Public Works Chestnut Avenue New Right Turn Lane onto E1 Camino Real Project No. 51-13231-0005 (TR-00-1), Bid No. 2298 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the E1 Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Reconstruction project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. BACKGROUND: Westbound Chestnut Avenue at E1 Camino Real has four lanes. Two left turn only lanes, one through lane and one through and fight turn lane. Some vehicles go straight in the outside lane and tend to block the vehicles that want to make a right turn. Traffic in the outside lane has, on occasion, backed up into Antoinette Lane. As a mitigation item for the new Costco facility, the southbound lanes on E1 Camino Real will need to increase the one left turn lane onto Chestnut Avenue to two lanes. This can be done without obtaining new property. The existing northbound parking lane will be removed to accomodate the new left turn lane. This project increased the number of westbound lanes on Chestnut Avenue from four to five. Additional property and easements had to be obtained to add the new lane. There are now two left turn only lanes; two through traffic lanes and one right turn only lane. This has improved the right turn traffic. The median island was reduced to accommodate the new lane and additional property was acquired from Cecchini Realty and BART. The revocable permit with the City and County of San Francisco Water Department was increased. The project has been inspected by City staff and is complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. Acceptance of the project will provide authorization for staff to file a Notice of Completion and to release the payment performance bond and ten percent retention at the end of the thirty day lien period. Staff Report To: Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Chestnut Avenue New Right Turn Lane onto E1 Camino Real September 11, 2002 Page: 2 of 2 FUNDING: The project was completed at a cost of $989,683.26. Funds were set aside in the 2001-02 Capital Improvement Program (CIP, Item #3) in the amount of $920,000.00. The amount was revised to $994,000.00 and is being funded by Developer Fees, Redevelopment Agency, Gas Tax, and Measure A. The following is a summary of the project cost: Design & City Admin costs Construction Purchase property/easements Construction Administration/Insp $ 60,000.00 $847,956.26 $ 41,727.00 $ 40,000.00 TOTAL $989,683.26 By: Director ~of Public .~w orks Michael A. Wilson City Manager FK/JG/ed Staff Report Date: September 11, 2002 To~ Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Director of Finance Subject: Resolution Approving Second Joint Powers Authority (JPA)Amendment Establishing SAMCAT: The San Mateo County Telecommunications and Franchise Negotiation Authority RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving the second Joint Powers Authority (JPA) amendment establishing the San Mateo County Telecommunications and Franchise Negotiation Authority (SAMCAT). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In June 1989, five agencies in San Mateo County formed a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) known as the San Mateo County Cable TV Authority (SAMCAT). SAMCAT's purpose was to aggregate the needs and negotiating power of these agencies to create a model Cable TV franchise that would provide better terms than these agencies had received in the past. The SAMCAT JPA was formed and the original member agencies did indeed obtain much better Cable TV franchise terms than in the prior franchise. In 1994 and again in 1996 further amendments were made to the SAMCAT JPA document. The most significant of these occurred in November 1996, when the SAMCAT JPA was amended to allow SAMCAT to work on issues and the development of model franchise documents that included various forms of telecommunications including fiber optic, wireless, microwave and other telecom services. Interest in SAMCAT's work in these areas resulted in the growth of the group from 8 members in 1996 to 19 member agencies today. Staff Report To~ Subject: Date: Page 2 of 3 Honorable Mayor and City Council Resolution Approving Second JPA Amendment Establishing SAMCAT September 11, 2002 PG&E Request For New Franchises Recently, cities in California were approached by representatives from PG&E requesting franchises for two new companies that PG&E plans to establish as part of their plan to reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy. These new firms would handle the existing Gas and Electricity Transmission systems and are called the "G-Trans" (Gas Transmission) and "E-Trans" (Electric Transmission) companies or the "newcos" for short. Some or all of the operations of the newcos would be regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) instead of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The existing PG&E firm would continue to exist and would handle distribution of Gas and Electricity. A competing plan of bankruptcy reorganization for PG&E has been offered by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The cPUC plan calls for PG&E to continue to operate both the Gas and Electric transmission and distribution systems and to continue to be subject to regulation by the CPUC (as is the case today). Both plans are subject to review by the Bankruptcy Judge and it is not clear at this point which plan will be adopted and approved. Role Of SAMCAT & League Of California Cities To move the process of developing the new franchises along in San Mateo County, PG&E representatives suggested that SAMCAT work on model franchises for the new G-Trans and E-Trans firms. This idea was discussed by the San Mateo City/County Managers Association and the SAMCAT Board of Directors. Both groups agreed that this would be a good approach as SAMCAT has prior experience in developing model franchises and it includes all but two cities in the county at this point. At the same time, it was also felt that many smaller cities in California would not have the resources to adequately review and negotiate the two "newco" franchises. SAMCAT approached the League of California Cities and suggested that they look into this area as well. The result is that the League is now meeting with PG&E and exploring if they should work on developing a framework for the two franchises and perhaps a model franchise document itself. In light of past experience working as a team in San Mateo County and getting better franchise terms as a result, it is recommended that the agencies in San Mateo County take Staff Report To: Subject: Date: Page 3 of 3 Honorable Mayor and City Council Resolution Approving Second JPA Amendment Establishing SAMCAT September 11, 2002 advantage of the opportunity to work together jointly. This requires amending the existing SAMCAT JPA document so that SAMCAT can take the League's final product in this area and tailor it to the unique needs of San Mateo County agencies. With that in mind, the attached second JPA amendment of SAMCAT was developed. It adds the duty of negotiating for model franchises with public utilities (such as PG&E) to SAMCAT's list of potential duties. Once adopted by 2/3 of the SAMCAT member agencies, the SAMCAT Board will then be in position to work on the draft franchise documents for the newcos that have been prepared by PG&E as well as any materials developed in this area by the League of California Cities. As always, the consideration and approval of any such franchises will be done by each City Council and by the Board of Supervisors in the case of San Mateo County. Prepared by: JFi Mich[el-A.k. Wilson City Manager Attachment: Resolution Joint Powers Agreement RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SECOND AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETX'VEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND OTHER AGENCIES WITHIN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A JOINT TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGUI2kTOR AND PUBLIC UTILITY FIL~XNCHISE NEGOTIATION STRUCTURE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, State of California, that it does hereby FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER, that: The public interest and convenience require that th~ agreement, cited in the title above, be executed. Said agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to sign and execute it on behalf of the City. ° The City Clerk is instructed to attest the signature of the Mayor and affix the corporate seal of said City. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the. day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk C:\WlNDOWS\TEMP\joint.powers.agree.res.doc SECOND AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND FRANCHISE NEGOTIATION AUTHORITY ("SAMCAT") THIS SECOND AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (hereinafter "this Agreement") by and between those governmental entities who are signatories to this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Member" or "Members" as the context requires), is made in light of the following recitals: RECITALS: Ao The undersigned are the member entities (the "Members") of that Joint Power Authority ("JPA") formerly known as the San Mateo Cable Television Authority created by Agreement dated June 27, 1989, pursuant to Government Code Section 6500 through Section 6518; and Co Bo The Members have authority to exercise certain .powers relating to telecommunication services and for the negotiation of and renegotiation of franchises with public utilities in their respective communities and desire to establish a telecommunication services and franchise negotiation joint powers authority ("SAMCAT"); and The Members are authorized to contract with each other for the joint exercise of any common power including those relating to telecommunication services, franchise negotiation, renegotiation and local regulation of public utilities pursuant to Government Code Sections 6500 through 6518; and The Members have previously amended the Agreement dated June 27, 1989 by adopting a First Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement on November 29, 1994, and the First Amended Joint Powers Agreement dated November 26, 1996, are included in this Second Amended Joint Powers Agreement which shall replace and supersede them; and The Members desire to include further changes in this Agreement to allow SAMCAT to have additional authority to negotiate, develop and implement agreements, franchises and procedures with respect to cable television, telecommunication services, public property leases and encroachment agreements related to telecommunications and cellular and fiber optic equipment, public utilities and services, the negotiation and renegotiation of public utility franchises and encroachment agreements, collect data, hold hearings, and regulate cable television (CATV) rates and other matters permitted by the State and Federal regulations for local cable television (CATV) franchising authorities, negotiate and renegotiate 1 franchises of public utilities and regulate such utilities to the extent permissible under state and federal law, all on behalf of the Members. NOW THEREFORE, the Members, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Purpose. The Members are entering into this Agreement for the sole purposes of: ao jointly addressing complaints from customers and potential customers of CATV within the jurisdictions of Members and including, but not limited to, the operation of a common office(s) to receive and address such complaints, the hiring of personnel to receive and address complaints; bo jointly operating or contracting for the operation of public, educational, and/or government access facilities; Co jointly providing research resources, including consultants, model ordinance and franchise provisions, to assist members in negotiating franchises, right-of-way agreements, lease and service agreements. These roles shall not be limited to cable television franchises, but shall include franchise, right-of-way, lease and service agreements involving cable television, telephone, competitive access providers (CAPs), open video systems (OVS), data, wireless, other telecommunications services, public utility agreements and franchises, encroachment and other matters relating to the use of franchising agency real property, rights of way or structures. do jointly collect data, hold hearings, and regulate cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless, and other telecommunications services permitted by the State and Federal regulations for local cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless and other telecommunications services for the Members of SAMCAT. jointly collect data and hold hearings concerning or relating to public utility use of the public rights of way, real property or structures as permitted by the State law for the Members of SAMCAT. go jointly hiring of agent(s) to represent the Members in leasing public property for telecommunications and public utility purposes. jointly developing model ordinances and procedures for right of way management, installation and maintenance of overhead, 2 o underground and above ground telecommunications equipment and infrastructure and public utility equipment and infrastructure; h. jointly studying and developing model agreements and procedures to develop city-owned and city-leased telecommunications networks including a regional approach to city and government telecommunications networks, and utilities, such as a government owned utility, a government leased utility or provider of fiber service to city, county and school district sites; The Members reserve to themselves the authority, and it is expressly agreed that SAMCAT shall have no authority, to adopt franchises, to require any franchise provisions, or to administer franchises, except as is provided in 1. a. -g. above. Establishment of the San Mateo County Telecommunications and Franchise Authority. The Members hereby create an agency or entity to be known as the San Mateo County Telecommunications and Franchise Authority ("SAMCAT"). The debts, liabilities, or obligations of SAMCAT shall be the debts, liabilities, or obligations of SAMCAT and not the debts, liabilities, or obligations of the Members. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by the Members. This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated as provided herein. Board of Directors. Each participating Member shall appoint one representative to serve on the Board of Directors. The Board shall elect one of its Members to serve as Chairperson. The Board shall meet as needed, but at least quarterly, and shall operate the programs of SAMCAT, shall review SAMCAT's progress and accomplishments, and shall resolve problems hindering the success of SAMCAT. Decisions of the Board shall be final. Powers. SAMCAT shall have the power to: address complaints from customers and potential customers of cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless, other telecommunications services, and public utility service complaints; bo operate a common office(s) to receive and address cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless, other telecommunications services complaints, and public utility service complaints; Co administer channels, frequencies, fibers, spectrum or other telecommunications resources allocated to or contracted for do eo no o° public, educational and/or government uses. provide research resources, including consultants, model ordinance and franchise provisions, to assist members in negotiating franchises, right-of-way agreements, lease and service agreements involving public utilities, cable television (CATV), telephone, competitive access providers (CAPs), open video systems (OVS), data, wireless, other telecommunications services. hire employees; make and enter into contracts to carry out its purposes; hold or dispose of property in order to carry out its purposes; incur debts, liabilities or obligations required by the exercise of these powers; provided, however, that such debts, liabilities or obligations shall not constitute responsibilities of the Members; sue or be sued in its own name; do all things that are necessary and convenient to carry out these powers and SAMCAT's purposes. jointly collect data, hold hearings, and regulate cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless, and other telecommunications services permitted by the State and Federal regulations for local cable television (CATV), telephone, data, wireless and other telecommunications services for the Members of SAMCAT. jointly collect data and hold hearings concerning or relating to public utility use of the public rights of way, real property or structures as permitted by the State law for the Members of SAMCAT. jointly hiring of agent(s) to represent the Members in leasing public property for telecommunications purposes. jointly developing model ordinances and procedures for right of way management, installation and maintenance of overhead, underground and above ground telecommunications equipment and infrastructure and public utility equipment and infrastructure; jointly studying and developing model agreements and procedures to develop city-owned and city-leased telecommunications networks including a regional approach to city and government telecommunications networks, and utilities, such as a government owned utility, a government leased utility or provider of fiber service to city, county and school district sites. These powers shall be exercised in the manner provided in this Agreement and, except as expressly set forth herein, subject only to such restrictions upon the exercise as are imposed upon the Members in the exercise of similar powers. Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the County of San Mateo, if it be a Member, from administering complaint and/or access facilities separate and apart from SAMCAT for those geographical areas designated by the County as not within SAMCAT's responsibilities. o Bud.qet. The Board of Directors shall adopt an operating budget for SAMCAT before April 1 of each year. The budget shall set forth anticipated expenses, financing sources and. proposed service levels necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Each Member's financial cost shall be paid within 30 days of billing. The financial responsibility of each Member shall be as follows: A budget covering Administrative Services shall be established annually and all SAMCAT members will be assessed an equal portion of that budget. All other expenses relating to SAMCAT activities shall be paid either by the agency incurring the cost, as a percentage of the subscriber base, divided equally, or other method agreed to by a majority of the total membership of SAMCAT. A Member shall approve the annual budget within forty-five (45) days of its submittal to the Member. Failure or refusal to so approve the annual budget shall be deemed to be a withdrawal pursuant to Paragraph 9 of this Agreement; provided, however, that if the budget increases a Member's contribution by less than $3,000.00, the Member shall be deemed to have automatically approved the annual budget. o Treasurer-Auditor and Controller. A Member ~ shall be designated the depository and have custody of all the money and property of SAMCAT, from whatever source. The same Member shall perform the functions of Auditor or Controller for SAMCAT. No Member shall be required to act pursuant to this section without its consent. The hold harmless provisions of this Agreement shall apply, except where there is willful misconduct on the part of the Treasurer/Auditor and/or Controller. Personnel. SAMCAT may request from the Members the services of such personnel to serve SAMCAT ex-officio as may be reasonably necessary to carry out this Agreement and shall have the power to employ professional and technical assistance for the performance of this Agreement, provided that adequate sources of funds are assured for the payment of such professional and technical services which are not provided by a party hereto. SAMCAT may request, although not require, that Members provide personnel and service to SAMCAT in order to carry out the purposes designated in this Agreement. Withdrawal. Any Member may withdraw from this Agreement by filing written notice of intention to do so with the other Members. Termination will take effect on July 1 of any year, provided there is at least six (6) months advance notice. The withdrawal of any party from this Agreement shall in no way affect the rights and obligations of the remaining Members. If a Member withdraws from this Agreement, it is not entitled to the return of any funds contributed to SAMCAT nor to the return in cash or in kind of any materials or supplies contributed. Withdrawing Members still are obligated for all payments due from them for the fiscal year of the withdrawal and all obligations and liabilities incurred during the membership. 10. 11. Termination and Disposition of Property. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated when only one Member continues to participate, or when all participating Members choose to terminate it. Upon termination, all assets shall be distributed to the Members still active at the time of termination or to the one Member continuing to participate. If there is more than one member at the time of termination, the assets shall be distributed in proportion to those Members' financial participation during the prior fiscal year. New Members. After the effective date of this Agreement, additional governmental entities may become Members of SAMCAT upon application and approval of the Board of Directors. Approval by the Board of additional Members shall be conditioned upon the following: ao The new Members reimburse SAMCAT for the expenses of SAMCAT resulting from the addition of the new Member, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, consultants' fees, accountants' fees, engineering fees and all other such reasonable out-of-pocket expenses as may be incurred. bo The elected governing body of the new Member adopt such resolutions and ordinances as shall be appropriate to permit SAMCAT to operate in a manner that is consistent with the existing operation of SAMCAT. Co The new Member comply with such other conditions as may be determined appropriate by the Board of Directors, before 12. 13. 14. 15. such new Member is admitted as a Member of SAMCAT. The new Member execute a counterpart of this agreement creating SAMCAT. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended from time to time by a two-thirds majority vote of the Members, acting pursuant to vote of their respective City Councils or governing boards. Insurance and Hold Harmless. SAMCAT is responsible for all insurance for its operations. Whenever possible at reasonable cost, SAMCAT shall name each of its members as additional insureds. No Member will be liable for claims because of its participation. SAMCAT, at its sole expense, shall defend and indemnify Members against any and all claims, judgments, losses, demands and costs in any way arising out of the operations of this Agreement. Miscellaneous. ao The section headings herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing the language in the section referred to. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of the State and is to be so construed. To preserve a reasonable degree of flexibility, parts of this Agreement are stated in general terms. It is understood that there will be operating memoranda executed and amended from time to time that will further define the rights and obligations of the Parties and which will be consistent with this Agreement and particularly the purposes and powers of SAMCAT. Severability.. Should any party term, or provision of this Agreement be by any agency of competent jurisdiction decided to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby. '7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereby by their duly authorized representatives, have affixed their hands on the day of ,2002. ATTEST: TOWN OF ATHERTON ATHERTON TOWN CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF BELMONT BELMONT CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF BRISBANE BRISBANE CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINGAME CITY CLERK MAYOR · ATTEST: TOWN OF COLMA COLMA TOWN CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF DALY CITY DALY CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF FOSTER CITY FOSTER CITY, CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH HILLSBOROUGH TOWN CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF MILLBRAE MILLBRAE CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF PACIFICA PAClFICA CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY PORTOLA VALLEY TOWN CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF REDWOOD CITY REDWOOD CITY CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF SAN BRUNO SAN BRUNO CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF SAN CARLOS SAN CARLOS CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF SAN MATEO SAN MATEO CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: TOWN OF WOODSIDE WOODSIDE TOWN CLERK MAYOR ATTEST: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SAN MATEO COUNTY CLERK PRESIDENT, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DriveF/Staff RpL~/JPAgfee lo Staff DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 11, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council City Clerk RESOLUTION AMENDING LIST OF DESIGNATED POSITIONS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION City Council recently adopted Ordinance No. 1313-2002, amending SSFMC Section 3.12.010, to add, delete, and amend specified City employee positions. As a result, the list of designated positions subject to the City's Conflict of Interest Code must be amended to reflect these changes. The following changes are recommended: New positions being added: · 11.5 Supervising Librarian Titles of existing positions being amended: · 6.2 Chief Planner to City Planner · 6.10 Manager of Housing and Community Development to Manager of Housing and Redevelopment · 8.4 Assistant Superintendent of Water Quality Control Plant to Assistant Plant Superintendent Position titles being deleted: · 6.7 Economic Development Coordinator · 8.12 Capital Project Coordinator Designated position title being corrected: · 17.2 Information Systems Administrator to Information Technology Manager Upon approval of the resolution, Statements of Economic Interest will be forwarded to persons holding designated positions, as required by the Conflict of Interest Code, and to be filed thereafter~ -/~-/~/J/Lgwith the City Clerk, the designated filing o fficer./ff~:5~~~ . _ . Sflx;ia'M. ~t3~e Michael A. Wilson City Clerk City Manager Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CAI JFORNIA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE LIST OF DESIGNATED POSITIONS SUBJECq' TO THE CITY OF SO~ SAN FRANCISCO'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 103-2001, the City Council previously adopted a list of designated positions subject to the City's Conflict of Interest Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council recently adopted Ordinance No. 1313-2002, amending South San Francisco Municipal Code section 3.12.010, to add, delete, and amend specified employee positions; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend the list of designated positions to reflect the changes made to Municipal Code section 3.12.010; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the changes to the list of designated positions and also approves the revised Exhibit A, which includes the changes identified herein. 1. The following position is added to the list: a. 11.5 Supervising Librarian, subject to disclosure category 6 2. The following position ritles are amended: a. 6.2 "Chief Planner" is now "City Planner" b. 6.10 "Manager of Housing and Community Development" is now "Manager of Housing and Redevelopment" c. 8.4 "Assistant Superintendent of Water Quality Control Plant" is now "Assistant Plant Superintendent" d. 17.2 "Information Systems Administrator" is now "Information Technology Manager." 3. The following positions are deleted from the list: a. 6.7 Economic Development Coordinator b. 8.12 Capital Project Coordinator RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A DESIGNATION OF POSITIONS AND APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DESIGNATED POSITIONS DISCLOSURE CATEGORY Members of the following Boards and Commissions 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 City Council Design Review Board Historic Preservation Commission Housing Authority Library Board Parking Place Commission Planning Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Conference Center Board Cultural Arts Commission Public Facilities Corporation Board of Appeals Form 700 1,2,3,4 1 1 6 3,4,6 Form 700 1,2,4,6 6 1,2 1,2,4 1,2,4 2. City Manager's Office 2.1 City Manager 2.2 Assistant City Manager Fo~700 1,2,4 3. City Clerk's Office 3.1 City Clerk 3.2 Deputy City Clerk 4. City Attorney's Office 4.1 City Attorney 4.2 Assistant City Attorney Form 700 1,2,3,4,5,6 5. City Treasurer's Office 5.1 City Treasurer 5.2 Deputy City Treasurer Form 700 1,2,3,4,5,6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Department of Economic & Community Development Director of Economic & Community Dev. Chief City Planner Principal Planner Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 ~.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 Housing Rehabilitation Specialist Economic Dev./Redev. Project Manager Manager of Housing and Comm',:n~D' Development Redevelopment Personnel and Labor Relations Director of Human Resources 1,2, 4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4,6 8o 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.10 8.11 8.!2 o 9.1 9.3 10. 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 Department of Public Works Director of Public Works City Engineer Superintendent of Water Quality Control Plant A~t e ..... r u; .... n,,~:~,, Control Plant Supt. Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Project Coordinator Development Review Coordinator Environmental Compliance Coordinator Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector Environmental Compliance Inspector Finance Department Director of Finance Assistant Finance Director Fire Department Fire Chief Deputy Fire Chief Battalion Chief Fire Marshal/Chief Building Official Assistant Fire Marshal Assistant Building Official Senior Building Inspector Building Inspector Fire Inspector Senior Code Enforcement Officer Code Enforcement Officer Permit Technician 11. Library 11.1 Library Director 6 11.2 Assistant Library Director 5 11.3 Project Read Director 6 11.4 Library Program Manager 6 11.5 Supervising Librarian 6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 1,2,4,6 !,3,4,~ 1,3,4,5 1, 3, 4, 5 6 6 6 1,2,4,6 6 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 5 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 12. 12.1 12.2 12.3 13. 13.1 13.2 13.3 14. 15. 15.1 16. 16.1 17. 17.1 17.2 Parks, Recreation & Community Services Director of Parks, Recreation & Maintenance Services Superintendent of Recreation & Community Services Deputy Director of Maintenance Services Police Department Chief of Police Police Captain Police Lieutenant Consultants Housine Authority Executive Director Conference Center Executive Director Information Technology Department Director of Information Technology Information Systems A~miniz~ator Technology Manager 1,2,4,6, 6 1,2,4,5,6 Form 700 1,2,4 1,2,4,6 6 Staff reports/Conflict of lnter-Exh A.doc { Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 11, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Community Outreach and Library Director RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT $48,173 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY AND $80,400 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM THE PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH FOR THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AND AMEND THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT'S 2002/2003 OPERATING BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution accepting $128,573.00 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Partnership's Community Health Initiative and amend the Library Department's operating budget for fiscal year 2002/2003. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION The South San Francisco Community Partnership (SSFCP) is a collaborative program dedicated to enhancing local services to meet the needs of our young children and their families. Program partners include the City of South San Francisco, the South San Francisco Unified School District, the San Mateo County Health Services Agency as well as local agencies, community organizations and parents. In 2000, the Partnership for the Public's Health (PPH) selected the SSFCP to be one of two community based recipients in San Mateo County to receive a four year funding grant to implement a community health initiative in partnership with San Mateo County Health Services Agency. During the first two grant years, the SSFCP used PPH funding to build community capacity by identifying and training community leaders to promote Partnership vision and goals in the community. The SSFCP also worked closely with the Health Services Agency to identify health and quality of life issues in the "Old Town" neighborhood. The Health Services Agency conducted a telephone survey to identify needs and build community support for this health initiative. The South San Francisco Community Partnership worked with the North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center, to conduct a "grassroots" door-to-door survey. Once the data was compiled from the surveys, focus groups were convened by trained community leaders to evaluate the data, prioritize community needs and select the top one or two issues to be addressed. The issues selected to be addressed over the next two grant years are: StaffReport Page 2 Subject: Resolution accepting $128,573 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Partnership's Community Health Initiative. Health Insurance Coveraee In the "Old Town" community, 25% of survey respondents did not have health insurance and close to 20% of the respondents' children did not have coverage. The SSFCP will work with our trained community leaders to enroll "Old Town" residents into San Mateo County's new health insurance program, "Healthy Kids." This program, to be operational by January 2003, will cover all uninsured children ages 0-18 up to 400% of the federal poverty level ($61,344 for a family of three), and will be funded by the Children and Families First Commission, County funds and private dollars. In addition, we will work with the County to enroll families in existing health insurance programs such as MediCal, the County Well Program, and Healthy Families. Job Connections In the "Old Town" community, 42% of survey respondents evaluated local employment opportunities as fair/poor. About 40% believe they need additional work skills or job training to remain competitive in the local economy. This belief is particularly held among Latino, young adult and female respondents. The SSFCP will work with local agencies such as Peninsula Works, the San Mateo County Labor Council, the South San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, the San Mateo County Community College District and the Regional Occupational Program to better connect our community with training opportunities and jobs. City Council previously accepted a total of $165,000 in funding from the Partnership for the Public's Health to support the first two years of the project plus $59,752 from the San Mateo County Health Services Agency to support a portion of the coordinator position, the door-to-door survey, and data analysis expenses. The combined $128,573 awarded in this third year of the grant will support the coordinator position, office expenses and operating expenses associated with public relations, and stipends or salary for part-time on-call community workers. FUNDING Grant funds received in fiscal year 2002/2003 will be used to amend the Library Department's current budget. Grant cycles typically run for one year from time of receipt; therefore, funds not expended at the end of fiscal year 2002/2003 will be carded over into the next fiscal year. Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing support after the close of the funding cycle. Staff Report Subject: Resolution accepting $128,573 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Partnership's Community Health Initiative. Page 3 BY:He a~the r~Qul~~ Director of Community Outreach Michael A. Wilson City Manager Valerie Sommer Library Director Attachments: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $128,573 IN REVENUE TO SUPPORT THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP'S COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE AND AMENDING THE 2002- 2003 OPERATING BUDGET (034) WHEREAS, staffrecommends acceptance of $128,573 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Partnership's Community Health Initiative; and WHEREAS, grant funds received in fiscal year 2002-2003 will be used to amend the Library Department's current budget. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby accepts $128,573 in revenue to support the South San Francisco Community Parmership's Community Health Initiative and amends the Library Department's 2002-2003 Operating Budget (034). I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk DATE: September 11, 2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Police Department SUBJECT: PREFERENTIAL PARKING AREAS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Ordinance and Resolution to be incorporated in the South San Francisco Municipal Code to establish preferential parking areas around the South San Francisco BART station as determined by the Engineering Division and the Chief of Police. The ordinance shall also allow the Police Department the authority to take enforcement action (parking citations) on violators. Parking violations shall include violations for no permit in the area and for improper use of a permit. A penalty fee of $35.00 is recommended at this time. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The new Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station located in South San Francisco will bring the community a new commute option. Along with this new option, comes a potential parking related challenge for the surrounding areas. With the possibility of overflow parking from the BART property, commuters may attempt to park their vehicles in the residential areas surrounding the station, thus creating a negative impact on the local streets and residents. Add to that, the parking fees BART plans to implement will increase the likelihood of commuters parking on the surrounding streets. A Preferential Parking plan containing permits for the residents in the areas, combined with parking enforcement efforts will protect the residents and prevent the surrounding streets from serving as a BART commuter parking area. California Vehicle Code Section 22507(a) grants local authorities the ability to establish preferential parking areas where residents are issued permits which exempts them from certain parking regulations. This section enables the City to post the designated areas with time restricted parking to discourage BART commuter parking, but allow the residents the ability to still park near their homes. Streets to be included in the preferential area will be determined by the Engineering Division and the Chief of Police. An estimated ¼ to ½ mile radius surrounding the BART station will be used as a guideline to establish the size of the area. The ¼ to ½ mile is often considered a comfortable or convenient walking distance for similar parking conditions. The area and the amount of streets included can be extended or reduced at the discretion of the Engineering Division and the Chief of Police after the parking situation is evaluated. The initial area will include sections of the Sunshine Gardens, Buff Buri (Sterling Manor) and Promenade subdivisions (See Exhibit 1). The designated area will be posted for three hour parking between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except vehicles with a South San Francisco parking permit. Signs will be Staff Report Subject: Page 2 PREFERENTIAL PARKING AREAS posted at various locations on each street to identify the area and to warn drivers of the time restriction (See Exhibit 2). The Engineering Department and the Chief of Police may adjust locations, days and times, as deemed necessary. Permits shall be issued for all vehicles legally allowed to park on the streets. Commercial vehicles, recreation vehicles and vehicles without current registration will not be issued permits. The permits will be issued to the registered owners at no cost, and shall be administered by the Police Department. Parking citations will be issued to those vehicles that are parked in the designated areas without a permit for more than three hours and to those vehicles that display a permit that is not issued to that vehicle. Additional citations may be issued each time a vehicle exceeds an additional three-hour time limit. Each violation will have a penalty fee of $35.00. The penalty fee will be comparable to those set by other police agencies throughout the county. The Police Department will work with the merchants in the area to ensure their property is posted correctly. The South San Francisco Unified School District is aware of our plans and is developing a parking plan for E1 Camino High School. FUNDING The cost of funding will be taken from the General Fund and has already been incorporated in this year's budget. BUDGET NEEDED: 1. Parking Enforcement Officer $57,775.00 2. Police Vehicle for Parking Enforcement Officer $21,500.00 3. Maintenance on Police Vehicle per year $2,500.00 4. Signs, Poles, and Associated Equipment (65 each) $6,500.00 5. Parking Permit Stickers (approximately 5000) $4,000.00 6. Door Hanger Notifications/Newspaper Publication $1,000.00 TOTAL: $93,275.00 By: I~ark~R~ffa~lliF Chief of Police Approved: Attachments: Ordinance Resolution Preferential Parking Permit Streets Exhibit 1: Streets to Implement Parking Permit Plan Exhibit 2: Proposed Signage Michael A Wilson City Manager ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 70 TO TITLE 11 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO PREFERENTIAL PARKING AREAS WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Title 11 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code should be amended to include Chapter 70 to provide for preferential parking areas with the first such area to include property near the South San Francisco BART Station; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the possibility of overflow parking from the South San Francisco BART Station may negatively impact neighborhoods near the BART Station; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by Vehicle Code section 22507(a), the City Council has determined that a Preferential Parking Plan containing permits for the residents in the areas, combined with parking enforcement efforts will protect the residents and prevent the surrounding streets from serving as a BART commuter parking area; and, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does ORDAIN as follows: The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for Preferential Permit Parking Areas to ensure that residents in the area surrounding the BART station have sufficient parking near their homes. Chapter 70 is hereby added to Title 11 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 11.70: PREFERENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAM. CHAPTER 11.70.010: DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter the following words and phrases shall have the meaning set forth in this section. mo "Address" means and includes any residential or business address. Each dwelling unit within an apartment building that is distinguished by an apartment number and each office within an office building that is distinguished by a suite number shall be considered an address. 202704-1 1 Bo Jo "Business" means an enterprise or establishment used for the purpose of conducting business located in the designated preferential permit parking area. "Preferential permit parking area," and "permit parking area," means any street upon which the City Engineer and Police Chief impose parking limitations pursuant to the authority granted by this chapter. "Fourteen (14) day visitor parking permit" means a parking permit issued pursuant to this chapter, which when displayed upon a motor vehicle, as described herein, shall exempt the motor vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter for a period of fourteen (14) days, beginning upon the date indicated upon the face of said permit. "Motor vehicle" means and includes automobile, track, motorcycle or other motor driven form of transportation less than ten thousand (10,000) pounds gross weight. "One-day visitor parking permit" means a parking permit issued pursuant to this chapter which when displayed upon a motor vehicle, as described herein, shall exempt the motor vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter or an ordinance or resolution enacted pursuant to authority granted herein, for the date indicated upon the face of said permit. "Preferential Parking Permit" means a permit issued under this chapter which, when displayed upon a motor vehicle, as described herein, shall exempt said motor vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter. "Person" means and includes, but shall not be limited to, individuals, corporations, businesses, partnerships, hospitals and churches. "Residence" means a legal residential address and shall exclude business addresses. "Resident" means any person eighteen (18) years of age or older whose legal residential or business address is in the designated preferential permit parking area. 202704-1 2 Ko "Visitor" means an individual who calls upon a resident in the designated preferential permit parking area with specific intent to spend time in or about that resident's residence but excluding persons visiting a home occupation or business." CHAPTER 11.70.020: ACTIONS AUTHORIZED THROUGH DISPLAY OF VALID PREFERENTIAL PARKING PERMIT mo A motor vehicle on which is displayed a valid preferential parking permit, as provided for herein, shall be permitted to stand or be parked in the preferential permit parking area for which the permit has been issued without being limited by time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter. Any motor vehicle, which does not display an authorized permit for the area and is not otherwise exempt, shall be subject to the preferential permit parking regulations and penalties in effect for such area. This chapter shall not be interpreted or applied in a manner that will abridge or alter regulations established by authority other than this chapter. C° This chapter shall not exempt the preferential permit parking holder from other traffic controls and regulations existing in the designated preferential permit parking area. Do This chapter shall not permit the preferential permit parking holder to leave standing his or her vehicle for more than seventy-two (72) hours. CHAPTER 11.70.030: DESIGNATION OF A PREFERENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA. A° The City Engineer and the Chief of Police may propose establishment of a preferential permit parking area in an area within the City of South San Francisco upon a showing that a significant daytime parking problem does or will exist. In proposing a preferential permit parking area, the City Engineer and Chief of Police may: 1. Undertake or cause to be undertaken such surveys or studies deemed necessary; 2. Cause to be drafted a resolution approving a specific preferential permit parking area. The resolution would establish a preferential permit parking area based upon studies, including any regulations and time restrictions determined by the City Engineer and the Chief of Police to be reasonable and necessary in such area. 202704-1 3 The City Council may approve, reject, or modify the resolution establishing a residential permit parking area." CHAPTER 11.70.040: MODIFICATION AFTER DESIGNATION OF A PREFERENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAM. The procedures set forth in Section 11.70.030 may also be used to modify or terminate an existing preferential permit parking area. CHAPTER 11.70.050: ISSUANCE OF PREFERENTIAL PARKING PERMITS. mo Preferential parking permits shall be issued by the South San Francisco Police Department in accordance with requirements set forth in this chapter. Each such permit shall be designed to state or reflect thereon the identification of the particular preferential permit parking area. No more than one preferential parking permit shall be issued to each motor vehicle owned or leased for which application is made. The South San Francisco Police Department shall issue preferential parking permits with a date of issuance. One preferential parking permit may be issued for each vehicle owned, leased, or under the continuing custody of any person who can demonstrate that they are currently a resident of the area for which the permit is to be issued. A preferential parking permit may be issued to a resident (or an employee of a business) located along a commercial street that has been determined by the City Engineer and the Chief of Police to be significantly impacted by the implementation of residential permit parking on adjacent residential streets. The City Engineer and the Chief of Police will determine which commercial streets qualify and the appropriate boundaries. Any resident or employee subject to this section will be allowed to obtain one permit for each motor vehicle they own, lease, or have under their continuing custody, but in no event shall there be more than 2 permits issued for any address. Residents or employees whose address is located in a building that was required by the City to provide on-site parking shall not be allowed to obtain a permit pursuant to this section. Renewal of Business Parking Permits issued pursuant to 11.70.050(D). Permits issued to employees of business must be renewed annually at the time of business license renewal and are non-transferable 202704-1 4 No vehicles may be parked on a street within a preferential parking permit area for more than three (3) hours unless a valid preferential parking permit or visitor permit is displayed on the vehicle in accordance with this Chapter. The City of South San Francisco Police Department is authorized to implement rules and regulations, not inconsistent with this chapter, governing the issuance and display of preferential parking permits. Any person to whom a preferential parking permit has been issued pursuant to this section shall be deemed a preferential parking permit holder. CHAPTER 11.70.060: VISITOR PERMIT. The Police Department may, under specified circumstances, issue visitor-parking permits in accordance with this section. A visitor- parking permit shall be displayed on any vehicle parked for more than three hours in a preferential parking permit area. A visitor- parking permit shall be of limited duration but shall otherwise grant to the holder all the rights and privileges of a regular preferential parking permit. Visitor parking permits may be issued to grant parking privileges for a maximum of fourteen days depending on the purpose for which the visitor-parking permit is requested. In reviewing an application for a visitor-parking permit, the Chief of Police shall consider, at a minimum, the following criteria: (1) Purpose for which the permit is sought; (2) Duration ofvisit; (3) Number of visitor-parking permits held by the applicant; and, (4) Availability of off-street parking in the surrounding area. A visitor parking permit shall clearly display the date upon which it becomes effective, the license number of the motor vehicle for which it applies, the name of the resident, and shall designate the particular preferential permit parking area for which it applies. A one-day visitor parking permit shall, during the date indicated upon the face of said permit, exempt the applicable vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter. A two (2) to fourteen (14) day visitor parking permit shall, for the period of applicable, commencing upon the date indicated upon the face of said permit, exempt the applicable vehicle from parking time restrictions established pursuant to this chapter. 202704-1 5 The Chief of Police is authorized to implement rules and regulations, not inconsistent with this chapter, concerning the issuance and display of visitor parking permits to permit holders. Fo An eligible applicant for a visitor parking permit shall be any person eligible to obtain a preferential parking permit pursuant to criteria set forth in Section 11.70.050, but no more than five visitor parking permits per address shall be in effect at any one time. CHAPTER 11.70.070: POSTING OF PREFERENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA. Upon the adoption by the City Council of a resolution designating a preferential permit parking area, and subsequent to purchase of the required minimum number of parking permits, the City Engineer and the Chief of Police shall cause appropriate signs to be erected in the area, indicating prominently thereon the time limitation, period of the day for its application, and conditions under which preferential permit parking shall be exempt therefrom. CHAPTER 11.70.040: VIOLATION, PENALTY/REVOCATION OF PERMIT. It is unlawful and shall constitute a violation of this chapter for any person to park a motor vehicle, without a current preferential parking permit properly displayed, at a curb within a preferential permit parking area for a period of time exceeding the time limitation established for that preferential permit parking area. Motor vehicles identified as used by disabled persons meeting the requirements of Section 22511.5 of the California Vehicle Code shall be exempt from this subsection. Violations of this Chapter shall be punished as an infraction. The fine for said violation shall be initially set at thirty-five dollar ($35.00) and may be adjusted upon the recommendation of the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police shall base the recommendation on a survey of fines imposed in comparable permit parking areas in neighboring jurisdictions. Specific violations include the following: Parking of any motor vehicle that does not contain a lawfully issued preferential parking permit or that is not otherwise exempt from the provisions of this Chapter in a preferential permit parking area for a period of time that exceeds the authorized time that a motor vehicle may park in a preferential permit parking area. 202704-1 6 Using or displaying an improper, unauthorized or false preferential parking permit in order to evade time limitations on parking applicable in a preferential parking permit area. The Chief of Police may revoke any permit that is issued where the Chief determines that the person requesting the permit has falsely represented that he/she is eligible for a parking permit or who has furnished false information as part of his/her application. 3. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, a Summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the Summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk's Office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk's Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. 4. SEVERABILITY In the event, any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional, such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. 202704-1 7 Introduced and at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, held the day of 2002, by the following vote: Adopted as an Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting of the City Council held the __ day of__ 2002: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing Ordinance this __ day of ., 2002. Mayor 202704-1 8 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREFERENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA FOR RESIDENTLM~ PROPERTY NEAR THE SOl ITH SAN FRANCISCO BART STATION WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Bart Station will open in Fall 2002; and, WHEREAS, there is a significant potential that individuals using the South San Francisco BART Station will desire to park their vehicles in residential areas adjacent to the BART Station; and, WHEREAS, BART may charge for parking at the South San Francisco Bart Station, which will further motivate individuals to park on adjacent streets; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to minimize the impact of the proposed BART station on nearby residential properties; and, WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Preferential Permit Parking Ordinance which authorizes the City Council, upon the recommendation of the Chief of Police and the City Engineer to establish preferential parking areas within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Chief of Police and the City Engineer have recommended adoption of a preferential parking area of the City near the South San Francisco BART Station as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of the Chief of Police and the City Engineer, the streets identified in Exhibit A shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 70, Title 11, and enforced in accordance with policies and procedures established by the Chief of Police. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves and establishes the preferential parking area shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and authorizes the Chief of Police to implement the program in phases as he deems appropriate. BE IT, FURTHER RESOLVED that enforcement of the preferential parking area restrictions shall not commence until all required signage has been installed. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: \WIULDER\VGATIRELL\file cabinet\Current Reso's\6-26PG&E.agree.res.doc City Clerk Preferential Parkinq Permit Streets: m. n. O. p. q. r. S. t. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. aa. Evergreen Drive, from Mission Road to Crestwood Drive Ferndale Avenue, from Baywood Avenue to Crestwood Drive Gardenside Avenue, from Baywood Avenue to Crestwood Drive Sequoia Avenue, from Mission Road to Miller Avenue Holly Avenue, from Mission Road to Miller Avenue Mission Road, from Evergreen Drive to Grand Avenue Miller Avenue, from Evergreen Drive to Holly Avenue Baywood Avenue Edgewood Way Oakcrest Avenue Westview Drive Alta Loma Drive, 200 and 300 Blocks Camaritas Avenue (300 Block), from El Campo Drive to the park El Campo Drive, from Alta Loma Drive to Camaritas Avenue Los Flores Avenue Clara Avenue Altura Way San Felipe Avenue, from Alta Loma Drive to Del Monte Avenue Bonita Avenue Carmelo Lane Amaryllis Court Cymbidium Circle Freesia Drive Hibiscus Drive McLellan Drive Miltonia Dr Orchid Dr Alta Loma Park parking lots will also be posted. Highlighted (solid) streets on map (Exhibit 1) show initial areas where permits will be issued and streets posted. mile radius ~ mile radius · EXHIBIT 1: STREETS. TO IMPL~T PARKING P,E~IT PLAN NOT TO SCALE 3 HOUR PARKING 7A.M. To 5P.M MON THRU FRI EXCEPT VEHICLES WITH SSF PARKING PERMITS 24" 12" EXHIBIT 2: PROPOSED SIGNAGE