Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-05-29 e-packet@3:00Wednesday, May 29, 2019 3:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA City Hall, City Manager's Conference Room 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA Special Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Special Meeting Agenda May 29, 2019Special Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Special Meeting Agenda NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Council and the Planning Commission Housing Standing Committee of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, May 29, 2019, at 3:00 p.m., at City Hall, City Manager's Conference Room, 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: Call To Order. Roll Call. Agenda Review. Public Comments. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development at 200 Airport in the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP). (Sailesh Mehra, Planning Manager) 1. Adjournment. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 6/6/2019 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development at 200 Airport in the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP).(Sailesh Mehra, Planning Manager) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Housing Standing Committee receive this staff report and provide input regarding the proposed mixed-use development at 200 Airport Boulevard. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On September 28,2018,Fairfield Residential submitted an application for a mixed-use development at 200-214 Airport Boulevard in the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP).The application was deemed complete on October 28, 2018,and therefore is not subject to the Inclusionary Housing Requirements for rental projects that took effect in November 2018.The 0.55-acre site (23,883 sq.ft.)consists of five parcels (APNs:012-338-010,012-338-020,012-338- 030,012-338-040,and 012-338-050)and is located adjacent to the future Caltrain Plaza at the intersection of Grand Avenue/Airport Boulevard and just north of the 150 Airport project that is currently under construction by the same developer. Further, the project site is located within the Downtown Transit Core (DTC) zoning district. The project consists of a contemporary seven-story mixed-use development,with ground-floor residential amenities and approximately 3,630 sq.ft.of retail space facing Airport Blvd.and the future Caltrain Plaza.Project parking consists of two levels of parking above grade that is wrapped by retail and amenity space.The applicant’s project plan set is attached, outlining the design, architectural and landscape concepts (Attachment 1). The proposed project includes: ·94 for-rent residential units (mix of studio, one- and two-bedroom units) o Including nine affordable units (see proposed Community Benefits - Attachment 2) ·110 parking spaces for residents, retail space, and visitors ·3,630 sq. ft. of ground-floor retail space ·Bicycle storage and amenities ·Sidewalk and streetscape improvements ·Pedestrian enhancements to Caltrain Plaza, including area adjacent to proposed retail space ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Downtown Station Area Specific Plan In February 2015,the City Council adopted the DSASP,as well as amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance,adding Chapter 20.280 “Downtown Station Area Specific Plan District”to implement the policies and goals in the DSASP.The DSASP covers properties within 0.5 miles of the City’s Caltrain Station,including the 200 Linden project site.The General Plan amendments created separate land use designations consistent with the DSASP. The 200 Airport project site is within the Downtown Transit Core (DTC)zoning district,which permits the most intense development to support the Caltrain station and downtown business community.The DTC district is focused within a 0.25-mile radius of the planned extension of the Caltrain Station and accompanying pedestrian/bicycle rail undercrossing, and is intended to provide sites for mixed-use development at high intensities in proximity to the Caltrain Station.It encourages active ground floor uses and high intensity developments that will generate pedestrian traffic in the area.The DTC zoning district allows a maximum base density up to 100 dwelling units per acre (up to 180 dwelling units per acre with an incentive program) and a maximum building height of 85 ft. City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 1 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. The DSASP includes the following guiding principles, which will be further implemented by the proposed project: ·Guiding Principle 1:Revitalize Downtown South San Francisco as a Citywide destination that is economically vital, diverse, active, and that encompasses a variety of uses. ·Guiding Principle 2:Increase development intensities in the Downtown to grow the resident population and thus support a variety of commercial and service uses. ·Guiding Principle 3: Encourage variety in new housing development. ·Guiding Principle 7:Focus public investments in the historic core of the City,along Grand Avenue and on adjoining streets in the Pedestrian Priority Zone to create an attractive pedestrian environment to support businesses Downtown. ·Guiding Principle 8:Focus increases in residential and mixed-use densities within ¼mile of the Caltrain Station and in areas proximate to Grand Avenue to increase patronage of Caltrain as well as Grand Avenue businesses. The proposed project will provide a high-density mixed-use and residential development that fulfills the guiding principles of the DSASP.The project will revitalize underutilized properties;add a robust population of new downtown residents;offer housing in close proximity to employment uses;focus investment in Downtown and make improvements within the Pedestrian Priority Zone;and centralize new transit-oriented development close to the relocated and enhanced Caltrain station. General Development Standards The DSASP zoning district also includes a variety of general development standards and supplemental regulations that are applicable to the proposed project.The applicant has submitted a Downtown Development Conformance Checklist (see Plan Set,Attachment 1),verifying project compliance with the applicable standards.The project meets the minimum and maximum residential density standards,as well as the 85 ft.maximum height limit as the project’s height is approximately 83 feet from grade to the top of the building’s parapet. Parking Reduction Request and TDM Plan The parking standards for Downtown districts are included in SSFMC Table 20.330.007 “Required Parking Spaces, Downtown Districts.” The parking requirements for multi-family residential units and retail uses are as follows: Multi-family Parking Requirements: ·Studio and less than 500 sq. ft.: one space maximum per unit o (26 units x one space maximum = 26 spaces required) ·One-bedroom or 500 - 800 sq. ft.: one space minimum, 1.5 spaces maximum per unit o (39 units x one space minimum = 39 spaces required) ·Two-bedroom or 801 - 1,100 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces minimum, 1.8 spaces maximum per unit o (29 units x 1.5 spaces minimum = 44 spaces required) ·Total Residential Parking Required: 109 spaces ·Total Residential Parking Provided:98 spaces Retail Parking Requirements: ·Retail sales*: one space per 400 sq. ft. of floor area o (3,630 sq. ft. / 400 sq. ft.= 9 spaces required) o *Note:No parking required for the first 1,500 sq.ft.of customer seating area,or floor area,as applicable,Per Section 20.330.004;therefore,only five (5)spaces would be required ([3,630-1,500 SF]/400 SF= 5 spaces) City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 2 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. ·Total Retail Parking Required: five (5) spaces ·Total Retail Parking Provided:12 spaces Total Project Parking Required: 114 spaces Total Project Parking Provided:110 spaces Based on these ratios,the total minimum parking required for the proposed mixed-use project would be 114 parking spaces.With a total of 110 parking spaces proposed,the developer is providing a minimum of one parking space per residential unit;ultimately however,the project would require a parking reduction of four parking spaces.Pursuant to SSFMC Section 20.330.007(C),applicants may obtain a parking reduction in the Downtown districts,so long as the Planning Commission makes a determination that there is sufficient parking within the district to accommodate the proposed use. In support of the parking reduction request,the applicant has also voluntarily proposed a draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM)plan (Attachment 3).The draft TDM plan provides a concise description of TDM Measures that the project will implement in order to comply with the DSASP’s goal to “provide for a balanced mix of travel modes - including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and automobiles” (Guiding Principle 8). The adjacent proximity of the new Caltrain plaza and station,employment uses East of 101,and retail and amenity uses in Downtown provide many opportunities for project residents and customers to walk or use public transportation,and reduce dependency on single-occupancy vehicles.Due to the project’s prime transit-oriented location and implementation of the measures outlined in the draft TDM plan,staff supports the request for a parking reduction from 114 to 110 parking spaces. Further, a Condition of Approval for project entitlements will be included to ensure TDM compliance. Vesting Tentative Map As part of the overall entitlements,the applicant has submitted a Vesting Tentative Map,prepared by BKF and dated September 27,2018,to combine the five separate lots located between 200-214 Airport Boulevard,totaling 0.55-acres (Attachment 1).The five lots are identified as APN:012-334-130,012-338-010,012-338-020,012-338-030,012-338- 040,and 012-338-050.Per Section 20.280.004 of the SSFMC,the minimum lot size in the DTC zoning district is 5,000 sq.ft.,with no maximum lot size listed;therefore,the combination of the four lots to a combined total 0.55-acre parcel meets the development standards.Furthermore,the Engineering Division has reviewed the request for the Vesting Tentative Map and has drafted conditions of approval for project entitlements. Community Benefits As provided under section 20.280.005(A)of the SSFMC,developers may request additional housing density in exchange for providing a variety of community benefits.The developer has submitted a draft of the Community Benefits Analysis that outlines proposed benefits for seeking the maximum allowable density under section 20.280.005(A)(Attachment 2). The proposed community benefits by the developer include: ·Nine affordable housing units, priced at “Moderate” income levels ·A retail space (3,630 sq. ft.) that will front and help activate the Caltrain Plaza ·Ongoing maintenance of Caltrain Plaza hardscape ·Up to $50,000 in design services for enhancements to the Caltrain Plaza ·Participation in the future South San Francisco Industrial Area Community Facilities District ·Public art costing approximately $75,000 Staff retained Economic &Planning Systems (EPS)to review and evaluate the Community Benefits proposal,using the information provided by the developer as well as the consultant’s expertise in real estate development costs,revenues,and financial returns in the South San Francisco market. EPS modeled the project at the base density of 55 units (without community benefits)compared to the project with the density bonus of 39 additional units (i.e.,with a total of 94 units and including the proposed community benefits).EPS’s City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 3 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. density bonus of 39 additional units (i.e.,with a total of 94 units and including the proposed community benefits).EPS’s analysis concluded that: ·The proposed package of community benefits has a value to the City of approximately $5.5 million (or $140,890 per additional unit). ·The overall financial return for the base density project was the same as for the project with density bonus (approximately 9%),and in both cases are low compared to the 12-15%margin typically required to attract equity funding for mixed-use projects of this size and type.This suggests that the level of community benefits being proposed is at or near the maximum that can be financially sustained by the project. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Downtown Transit Core.The General Plan includes specific policies related to development within the Downtown,in an effort to “encourage development of Downtown as a pedestrian-friendly mixed-use activity center with retail and visitor-oriented uses,business and personal services, government and professional offices, civic uses, and a variety of residential types and densities.” The General Plan Downtown Sub-Area includes the following guiding policies in relation to Downtown development: ·Guiding Policy 3.1-G-1:Promote Downtown’s vitality and economic well-being,and its presence as the City’s center; ·Guiding Policy 3.1.-G-2:Encourage development of Downtown as a pedestrian-friendly mixed-use activity center with retail and visitor-oriented uses,business and personal services,government and professional offices, civic uses, and a variety of residential types and densities; ·Guiding Policy 3.1-G-3:Promote infill development,intensification,and reuse of currently underutilized sites; and ·Guiding Policy 3.1.-G-5:Use the South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan as a guide for General Plan policies for the Downtown Station Area. The proposed project will conform to the General Plan Land Use Policies by reusing a set of underutilized sites to construct a high-density,mixed-use residential development that will improve the pedestrian environment and provide active and vibrant retail uses adjacent to the future Caltrain Plaza and Airport Boulevard.The project also utilizes a variety of architectural detailing and materials to accentuate the building and further define the Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue intersection,a prime gateway to the historic Grand Avenue corridor and the future Caltrain Plaza. Moreover,the project implements the goals of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan and the project design is consistent with the City’s Design Guidelines as it relates to building design, form and articulation. SUSTAINABILITY / CLIMATE ACTION PLAN The proposed project is consistent with recent sustainability regulations that have been adopted at State,regional and local levels.Examples include Senate Bill 375,passed in 2008,which aims to create more efficient communities by providing alternatives to using single occupancy vehicles.Projects that link higher density development to transit help meet this goal.At the local level,the DSASP aims to link the Downtown with the Caltrain Station and other regional transit,including SamTrans.The applicant is proposing a high-density residential project that will be located within 0.25 miles of the Caltrain station and within walking distance of regional and local bus routes,consistent with the above mentioned sustainability goals. In February 2014,the City adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP),which serves as South San Francisco’s greenhouse gas reduction strategy.The CAP includes requirements applicable to new development projects;following are the specific requirements applicable to the proposed project. City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 4 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. ·Require all new development to install conduit to accommodate wiring for solar; ·Encourage the use of high-albedo surfaces and technologies as appropriate,as identified in the voluntary CALGreen standards; and ·Implement the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. As currently designed,the proposed project will comply with many of the standards above,and staff will continue to work with the applicant to incorporate as many sustainable features as possible into the project.During entitlements,Staff will include a Condition of Approval that requires the applicant to include the CAP requirements stated above subject to Chief Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) The Design Review Board (DRB)reviewed the project at the January 15,2019 meeting.The DRB members recommended approval of the design, with the following comments and/or modifications: 1.The Board looked favorably on the proposed design concept. 2.For the two-story base around the west and south elevations, the portions of the Board form concrete may look too industrial for the site. Consider breaking it up and utilizing additional accent materials (similar to the adjacent 150 Airport Blvd project). 3.For the outdoor amenity spaces and courtyard area, a wind study should be conducted to help mitigate wind- related issues on outdoor communal spaces. The area is subject to substantial wind and all outdoor areas should be constructed with appropriate wind mitigation such as glass wall panels, windscreens, etc. a.If wind elements cannot be mitigated, consider relocating the courtyard to the South, Southeast, or East to gain more usable outdoor spaces. b.The roof terrace may also have exposure to the wind, as the proposed glass wall will not provide the proper protection from the wind. Consider heightening the glass wall to the top of the floor to mitigate any incoming winds. 4.Sheet TM4 does not show the existing grading on the east side of the building, nor does it show the resulting surface flow. Please identify and confirm how this could impact the project. 5.Review the landscaping plan, as the proposed street trees look too small and are not in scale with the building. In addition, consider the following changes to the landscape plan: a.The proposed Magnolia trees are too short and will not scale the height of the building; therefore, consider a taller and narrower species that will reach the height of the third story. b.Confirm that the root zones for the trees are large enough for optimal tree growth (i.e. the root zones will need to have at least a 12x12x4 area for healthy growth). c.Replace the Giant Bamboo species as it will not survive the SSF microclimate. d.Replace the Forest Pansy Redbud species as it will not survive the SSF microclimate. e.Replace the Arctostaphylos species as it will not survive the SSF microclimate. f.The proposed Cajeput tree species can be a brittle species and a long-term maintenance problem; recommend replacing with Swan Hill Olive tree species. 6.Provide more detailed information on the existing Electrical, Sanitary, and Water utilities and how they will not impede the tree design. 7.Check with the South San Francisco Scavenger Company to determine the proper location for the trash enclosures and pickup areas, including the pickup area located on the second floor of the garage. The applicant will be conditioned to obtain a will serve letter from Scavenger. 8.On the rooftop, consider incorporating solar panels to the project. The applicant worked with staff to address the Board’s concerns throughout various working sessions and plan set City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 5 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. The applicant worked with staff to address the Board’s concerns throughout various working sessions and plan set revisions.For the full DRB Comment Letter,please view Attachment 4.Furthermore,a Condition of Approval will be added to the project entitlements to ensure that the applicant incorporates the Board’s final comments and recommendations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Government Code section 65457,as it is a residential development project that is being undertaken pursuant to a specific plan for which an EIR was prepared and certified and no event specified in Public Resources Code section 21166 has occurred.The project is also exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332 as it is a qualified in-fill development project. In addition to the above exemptions,CEQA allows for limited environmental review of subsequent projects under a program EIR.(CEQA Guidelines section 15168.)Components of a subsequent project must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether any additional environmental analysis must be conducted.The CEQA Guidelines require lead agencies to use checklists or similar mechanisms to conduct this evaluation.Staff,in conjunction with the applicant’s environmental consultant,prepared an Environmental Consistency Analysis (ECA)(Associated Resolution, Exhibit G),which satisfies the CEQA Guidelines.Under this ECA,the City of South San Francisco (City)uses a written checklist to evaluate the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the proposed project were sufficiently analyzed under the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP)program EIR.(CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c)(4)). On January 28,2015,a programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR)was certified by the City Council (Final Environmental Impact Report for the South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP),State Clearinghouse #2013102001.)The program EIR assessed the potential environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the DSASP,which established new land use,development,and urban design regulations for the area over a 20-year planning period.The City Council also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (“SOC”)on January 28,2015,which carefully considered each significant and unavoidable impact identified in the EIR and found that the significant environmental impacts were acceptable in light of the economic,legal,social,technological and other benefits associated with implementation of the DSASP. The ECA demonstrates that even if the project was not exempt from CEQA,it would still qualify for streamlining pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168.In addition,the ECA analysis further supports the above-stated exemptions by concluding that all environmental effects stemming from the project were previously analyzed and no event pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 has occurred since preparation and certification of the DSASP program EIR. Specifically,the 200 Airport Blvd.ECA considers whether any new environmental effects not identified in the DSASP program EIR might be created by construction and operation of the 200 Airport project and concludes that all environmental effects were previously analyzed,no new mitigation is necessary,and no additional environmental review is required.In order to support the ECA analysis,the applicant provided the following technical studies,which were peer reviewed by City staff and consultants: ·Traffic and Circulation Analysis - Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. ·Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Health Risk Assessment - LSA Associates, Inc. ·Noise and Vibration Study - LSA Associates, Inc. ·Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Geocon Consultants, Inc. ·Historic Resources Report - LSA Associates, Inc. ·Shadow Analysis - Carrierjohnson + Culture The ECA established the following: 1.The proposed project is in compliance with all applicable DSASP regulations,and as a result,would not create any additional environmental impacts in excess of those analyzed and addressed by the DSASP program EIR and City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 6 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. any additional environmental impacts in excess of those analyzed and addressed by the DSASP program EIR and SOC; 2.The DSASP program EIR MMRP thresholds would apply to the project and require certain identified mitigations related to: a)Air Quality:A Health Risk Assessment was required and confirmed that construction related and temporary air quality impacts and future resident exposure would be below applicable thresholds with mitigation measures as identified in the DSASP program EIR; b)Biological Resources:Compliance with tree removal regulations related to nesting season,as required by the California Fish and Game Code and Tree Preservation Ordinance; c)Cultural Resources:Any cultural resources identified during demolition or grading of the properties would need to be immediately analyzed and all construction would cease;a Historic Resources Assessment was required and confirmed that the subject buildings within the project area were not historic or eligible for historic status and did not meet applicable thresholds; d)Greenhouse Gas Emissions:A condition of approval would be included requiring conformance with the Climate Action Plan; and e)Noise:A Noise Study was required and confirmed that residential exposure was below applicable thresholds by utilizing window controls, mechanical ventilation, and appropriate sealing. 3.The ECA recommended the following Conditions of Approval that would ensure that the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those that were previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR: ·Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 1:In compliance with the requirements of DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1,the project contractor shall ensure all off‐road diesel‐powered construction equipment used for the project meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB)Tier 2 emissions standards and are retrofitted with a level 3 diesel particulate filter or equivalent. ·Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2:In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measures MM4.2‐3, the following measures shall be required to reduce health risks to a level sufficient to achieve compliance with BAAQMD thresholds: o The project applicant shall provide a heating,ventilation,and air conditioning (HVAC)system with a control efficiency sufficient to result in a reduction of a minimum 75.0 percent of particulates of 2.5 microns or less,such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV)‐12 filters or greater, for indoor air filtration systems.The ventilation system shall be certified to achieve the stated performance effectiveness from indoor areas. o All air intakes shall be located as far away from US 101 as feasible. o The project applicant shall ensure the proper indications on the specifications for maintaining the installed air filtration system are provided to future residents of the project site. ·Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3:In compliance with the requirements of DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐3,the project applicant shall implement the following measures,or similar combination of measures,which demonstrate that interior noise levels would be reduced to an acceptable level of 45 dBA CNEL or lower: City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 7 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. o In order for windows and doors to remain closed,mechanical ventilation such as air conditioning shall be provided for all units. o All vent ducts connecting interior spaces to the exterior (i.e.,bathroom exhaust,etc.)shall have at least two 90 degree turns in the duct. o All windows and doors shall be installed in an acoustically‐effective manner.Sliding‐window panels shall form an air‐tight seal when in the closed position and the window frames shall be caulked to the wall opening around the perimeter with a non‐hardening caulking compound to prevent sound infiltration.Exterior doors shall seal air‐tight around the full perimeter when in the closed position. o A Final Acoustical Report shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit to determine all the minimum STC ratings for the walls,windows,and doors to be provided to the City for review. This report shall be completed by a qualified acoustical consultant to ensure that the selected windows and doors in combination with wall assemblies would reduce interior noise levels sufficiently to meet the City’s interior noise standard for residential uses. ·Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4:In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐5,at the time of building permit submittal,the project applicant shall submit a site specific vibration analysis to confirm what,if any,vibration design mitigation measures have been implemented into the building design to ensure vibration levels are reduced to less than 72 VdB.The report shall be submitted to the City for review as part of the building permit submittal package.If necessary,methods to reduce vibration may include,but are not limited to,the use of elastomer pads to support the building foundation,deeper joists,shorter floor spans,and/or lally columns.Proposed building structures should be designed to minimize vibration amplification at the upper floors. ·Project‐Specific Recommendation 1:The proposed project should designate a loading area for moving/delivery trucks and ridesharing vehicles to pick‐up and drop‐off residents. ·Project‐Specific Recommendation 2:The proposed project should include a Travel Demand Management (TDM)program to implement strategies to encourage residents to use transit and off‐set the potential parking deficit. ·Project‐Specific Recommendation 3:The proposed project shall provide 12 short‐term bicycle parking spaces on site as required by the zoning ordinance. The above Conditions of Approval will be included as part of the project entitlements. CONCLUSION Staff requests that the Housing Subcommittee provide input and direction regarding the proposed mixed-use residential project at 200 Airport Boulevard. ATTACHMENTS 1.200 Airport Project Plan Set 2.Draft Community Benefits Analysis 3.Preliminary TDM Plan 4.200 Airport DRB Comment Letter, dated 1.30.19 City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 8 of 9 powered by Legistar™ File #:19-240 Agenda Date:5/29/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. 5.Environmental Consistency Analysis (excluding technical studies) City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/24/2019Page 9 of 9 powered by Legistar™ 200 AIRPORT BLVD. APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SET APRIL 15, 2019 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:30 AM 5898.00 Author Checker PROJECT LOCATION, DATA, DRAWING INDEX T0.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAT0.0 COVER SHEET T0.1 PROJECT LOCATION, DATA, DRAWING INDEX T0.2 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY T0.3.1 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.3.2 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.3.3 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.4.1 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.4.2 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.4.3 DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.5 F.A.R. DIAGRAMS T0.6 VICINITY MAP-SURROUDING PARCELS T0.7 PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY T0.8 PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY A1.0 SITE PLAN A2.1 LEVEL 1 A2.2 LEVEL 2 A2.3 LEVEL 3 A2.4 LEVEL 4-6 A2.5 LEVEL 7 A2.6 ROOF PLAN A2.7 UNIT PLANS - STUDIOS A2.8 UNIT PLANS - ONE BEDROOMS A2.9 UNIT PLANS - ONE BEDROOMS A2.10 UNIT PLANS - TWO BEDROOMS A2.11 UNIT PLANS - TWO BEDROOMS A3.1 WEST ELEVATION A3.2 NORTH ELEVATION A3.3 EAST ELEVATION A3.4 SOUTH ELEVATION A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.2 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.3 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.4 BUILDING SECTIONS A5.1 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.2 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.3 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.4 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.5 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.6 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A6.1 MATERIALS BOARD A7.1 SUN SHADE STUDIES project location PROJECT 200-214 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEW CONSTRUCTION 7 STORY MIXED USED BUILDING CONSISTING OF 5 LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION OVER 2 LEVELS OF TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION ABOVE GRADE PARKING WITH GROUND LEVEL RETAIL. SHEET INDEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION 012-338-050 (PARCEL ONE AND TWO) 012-338-040 (PARCEL THREE) 012-338-030 (PARCEL FOUR) 012-338-020 (PARCEL FIVE) 012-338-010 (PARCEL SIX) SITE AREA: 23,883 SQ FT OR 0.548 ACRES ZONING DTC - DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CORE PROJECT TEAM: OWNER/DEVELOPER FF Realty III LLC 5510 Morehouse Drive, CA 92121 Tel: 858.626.8334 Contact:Trevor Boucher ARCHITECT CarrierJohnson + Culture 1301 Third Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619.239.2353 Contact: Claudia Escala CIVIL ENGINEER BKF Engineers 1730 N. First Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 92660 Tel: 408467.9100 Contact: Cole Gaumnitz LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MJS Landscape Architecture 507 30th Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 Tel: 949.675.9964 Contact: Paul Maksy CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE IIIA (UPPER LEVELS 3 THRU 7 RESIDENTIAL) TYPE IA (GROUND LEVEL AT GRADE PARKING, LOBBY, RETAIL FULLY SPRINKLERED PER CBC CHAPTER 9 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION R-1 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL A-3 RESIDENTIAL AMENITY SPACE B LEASING/MANAGEMENT OFFICE S-2 PARKING GARAGE M RETIAL APPLICABLE CODES CBC 2016 CITY OF SOUTH FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 7 STORIES 83' - 1" FROM DATUM (AVG. OF HIGHEST/LOWEST GRADE) vicinity map TM1 TITLE SHEET TM2 EXISTING CONDITIONS TM3 MAP SHEET TM4 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN TM5 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN TM6 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN L.1 COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE PLAN L.2 GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN L.3 LEVEL 3 PODIUM COUTRYARD ENLARGEMENT L.4 LEVEL 7 ROOF TERRACE ENLARGEMENT L.5 LIFESTYLE IMAGERY L.6 COMPOSITE PLANTING PLAN & PLANT PALETTE L.7 HYDROZONE PLAN L.8 CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:30 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY T0.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:31 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.3.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:31 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.3.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:31 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DOWNTOWN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN T0.3.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:32 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.4.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:32 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.4.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:32 AM 5898.00 Author Checker DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - DESIGN GUIDELINES T0.4.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DN DN UP ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:45 AM 5898.00 Author Checker F.A.R. DIAGRAMS T0.5200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA1 FAR - LEVEL 1 2 FAR - LEVEL 2 3 FAR - LEVEL 3 - LEVEL 6 4 FAR - LEVEL 7 8,431 GSF 6,167 GSF 19,553 GSF 18,496 GSF SITE BAYSHORE FWY (HIGHWAY 101)AIRPORT BOULEVARDCYPRESS AVENUEBADEN AVENUE GRAND AVENUE VILLAGE WAY P O LE T T I W A Y E GRAND AVENUE SYLVESTER ROADG R A N D A V E N U EDUBUQUE AVECALTRAIN PLAZA RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL HOTEL INDUSTRIAL ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:46 AM 5898.00 Author Checker VICINITY MAP-SURROUDING PARCELS T0.6200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 1 VICINITY MAP ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:47 AM 5898.00 Author Checker PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY T0.7200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA1 - LOOKING SOUTHEAST 2 - LOOKING SOUTHWEST 3 - LOOKING NORTHWEST 4 - LOOKING NORTHEAST 5 - LOOKING NORTHWEST 6 - LOOKING NORTHEAST 7 - LOOKING SOUTHEAST 8 - LOOKING WEST 5 6 1 2 3478 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:49 AM 5898.00 Author Checker PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY T0.8200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA1 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:49 AM 5898.00 Author Checker PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY T0.8200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA1 - AIRPORT FRONTAGE NORTH 2 -AIRPORT FRONTAGE SOUTH 3 - NW VIEW 4 - SE CORNER 5 - SOUTH VIEW 6 - SW CORNER 7 - WEST FRONTAGE 8 - WEST VIEW 2 3 4 5 678 20"TREE 18" CLUSTEREDGE OF BRUSHLANE STRIPE 30" SQ. 30" SQ. BIKE RACKBIKE RACKBIKE RACK 8 F T. SQ. T UUCI SQ UARE 8 F T. SQ. T UUCI SQ UARE 8 FT. SQ.TUUCI SQUARE 8 FT. S Q. TUUCI SQ UA RE 8 F T. SQ. T UUCI SQ UARE 8 FT. SQ.TUUCI SQUARE 8 F T. SQ. T UUCI SQ UARE 8 FT. SQ.TUUCI SQUARE 30"x48" ADACLEAR SPACE ADJ TO BENCH 6' WIDEBENCH 24"DIA. 48"DIA. 48"DIA. 48" DIA. 48" DIA. BIKE RACK 24" DIA. BIKE RACK BIKE RACK 30"x48" ADA CLEAR SPACE ADJ TO BENCH 6' WIDE BENCH AIRPORT BOULEVARD GRAND AVENUEB A Y S H O R E F R E E W A Y (1 0 1 )RESIDENTIAL 7 STORIES GROUND FLOOR RETAIL EGRESS EGRESS RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 201.36' 125.85'98.20'158.61'7 5 .5 1 '36.61'45.70'UTILITY ACCESS RETAIL PARKING ENTRY RETAIL ENTRY VEHICULAR INGRESS & EGRESS FUTURE CALTRAIN PLAZA UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT 100.42 100.10 99.88 99.88 99.40 102.42 100.42 SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (6)SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (6) LOADING AREA AT 150 AIRPORT TO BE USED FOR 200 AIRPORT RESIDENTS AND RETAIL LOADING AREA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:45 AM 5898.00 Author Checker SITE PLAN A1.0200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 1 SITE PLAN N0 40 6020 GRAPHIC SCALE SITE AREA: 23,883 SF LOT COVERAGE:97.75% FAR:6.02 AVG. ELEV. ABOVE MSL 99.91' UP DN 3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4 A3.1 1 A3.4 1 8.33% 12% 102.42100.42 100.42 100.42 8% 320 SF UTILITY 967 SF LOBBY 620 SF BIKE STORAGE 3634 SF RETAIL 98 SF RETAIL UTILITY A3.21 RETAIL 1 323 SF BACKFLOW PREVENTORS217 SF UTILITY MAIL BOXES A3.3 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL 4 RETAIL 5 RETAIL 6 RETAIL 7 RETAIL 8 RETAIL 9 RETAIL 10 RETAIL 11 RETAIL 12 RES. 1 RES. 2 30 SF RETAIL STORAGE 1 A4.2 16%RAMP UP RAMP UP 102.42 100.42 181 SF RETAIL TRASH 50 PARKING SPACES WITH MECHANICAL CAR LIFT 34 BICYCLES - VERTICAL STACKED 12 RETAIL PARKING SPACES 2 RES. PARKING SPACES 201' - 4 1/2" 118' - 9 1/2"18' - 9"63' - 10"47' - 2"27' - 2"84' - 3"27' - 0"125' - 10" 39' - 4"97' - 11"31' - 3"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"18' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"VAN VAN 99.88 9' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0" 3 ' - 1 "3' - 0"3' - 0"3 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 0 " 99.88 99.40 8' - 6"8' - 6" 8' - 6"8' - 6"9' - 0"8' - 0" 8' - 6"8' - 6" 25' - 6"18' - 1 1/2"18' - 1 1/2"25' - 6"17' - 0"1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 " 1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "25' - 6"25' - 6"1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "25' - 6"1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "17' - 0"1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 " 100.10 3.40% RAMP DN RAMP DN 102.42 102.42 102.42 MECHANICAL FILTRATION BELOW SLAB GREASE INTERCEPTOR UNDER SLAB GARAGE DOOR SECURITY GATE 24' - 0"2 6 ' - 0 " 2 4 ' - 0 " 100.42 102.42 7.87%PLATFORM LIFT 102.42 99.88 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:47 AM 5898.00 Author Checker LEVEL 1 A2.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 1 N0 4'2'16'8' 3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4 A3.1 1 A3.4 1 24' - 0"24' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 " 1124 SF STORAGE A3.21 A3.3 1 1 A4.2 16%8%RAMP DOWN 46 PARKING SPACES 453 SF TRASH ROOM2' - 9"2 ' - 9 " 13' - 5"10' - 10"CANOPY CANOPY 8' - 6" TYP. 8' - 6" 8' - 6"18' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"18' - 0"TYP.5' - 0"T Y P . 5 ' - 0 " S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 TYP. 4' - 0"6' - 9"S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 S27 S28 S29 S30 S31 S32 S33 S34 S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S40 S41 S42 S43S44S45S46 S47 S48 S49 S50 S51 S52 S53 S54 S55 S56 S57 S58 S59 S60 S61 S62 S63 S64 S65 S66 S67 S68 S69 S70 8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"TYP.8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "8' - 6"TYP8' - 6"8' - 6"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:48 AM 5898.00 Author Checker LEVEL 2 A2.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 N0 4'2'16'8' DNUP UP 60" DIA. 60" DIA.5' DIA. ADACLEARSPACESINGLE BBQ5' DIA. ADACLEARSPACESINGLE BBQ24" DIA. 60" DIA. 48" DIA.36" WIDEPRIVATEPATIO ONLY36" DIA. 24" DIA. 24" DIA.36" WIDEPRIVATEPATIO ONLY48" DIA. 3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4 A3.1 1 A3.4 1 A3.21 A3.3 1 2048 SF COURTYARD 1 A4.2 551 SF S2 545 SF S2 592 SF S1 588 SF S1 592 SF S1 1056 SF B6 800 SF A1 811 SF A2 782 SF A5 778 SF A6 1043 SF B2 530 SF S3 766 SF A4 716 SF A4 1050 SF B3 1089 SF B4 802 SF A3 1220 SF B5 1046 SF B1 98 SF TRASH 140 SF ELEC 144 SF STORAGE 347 SF STORAGE 2283 SF CORRIODR 187 SF STAIR 2 197 SF STAIR 1 161 SF ELEV 150 SF UNISEX 207 SF STORAGE 2"1' - 0"1 1/2"1' - 0"1' - 0"1 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 381 SF BALCONY 202 SF BALCONY 122 SF BALCONY 135 SF PATIO 199 SF PATIO 91 SF PATIO 41 SF BALCONY 41 SF BALCONY S71 S72 S73 S74 S75 98 SF PATIO 123 SF PATIO 225 SF PATIO 57 SF BALCONY 6 ' - 0 "6' - 0"6 ' - 0 "6' - 7"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:51 AM 5898.00 Author Checker LEVEL 3 A2.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 LEVEL 3 N0 4'2'16'8' DNUP DNUP 3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4 A3.1 1 A3.4 1 A3.21 A3.3 1 1 A4.2 47' - 3"68' - 0 1/2" 7 4 ' - 1 "152' - 3 1/2"54' - 2"7 8 ' - 9 " 1 9 ' - 0 "2' - 7"4' - 10 1/2"S76 S77 S78 S79 S80 551 SF S2 545 SF S2 592 SF S1 588 SF S1 593 SF S1 1056 SF B6 800 SF A1 811 SF A2 782 SF A5 785 SF A6 1043 SF B2 876 SF A7 764 SF A4 716 SF A4 1050 SF B3 1088 SF B4 802 SF A3 1220 SF B5 1046 SF B1 98 SF TRASH 140 SF ELEC 146 SF STORAGE 347 SF STORAGE 2094 SF CORRIODR 187 SF STAIR 2 197 SF STAIR 1 161 SF ELEV 207 SF STORAGE 151 SF BALCONY 61 SF BALCONY 55 SF BALCONY 49 SF BALCONY 49 SF BALCONY 120 SF BALCONY 6' - 0"42 SF BALCONY 42 SF BALCONY 6' - 0"108 SF BALCONY 41 SF BALCONY 41 SF BALCONY 58 SF BALCONY 6 ' - 0 "6' - 0"6 ' - 0 "6' - 0"6' - 0"126' - 8 1/2"30' - 9"18' - 6"49' - 2"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:54 AM 5898.00 Author Checker LEVEL 4-6 A2.4200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 LEVEL 4 - LEVEL 6 N0 4'2'16'8' DN UP 24" x 60"5' DIA. ADACLEARSPACESINGLE BBQKORNEGAY QUARTZ QS-45 15" DIA.18" x 48"36" DIA. 36" DIA. 36" DIA. 24" DIA. 24" DIA. 15" DIA. 15" DIA.15" DIA. 15" DIA. 24" DIA. 24" DIA. 24" x 60" KORNEGAY QUARTZ QS-45 KORNEGAY QUARTZ QS-45 KORNEGAY QUARTZ QS-45 KORNEGAY QUARTZ QS-4518" x 48"18" x 48"3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4 A3.1 1 A3.4 1 A3.21 A3.3 1 1 A4.2 68' - 0 1/2"54' - 2"152' - 2"45' - 0"47' - 1" ROOF CANOPY ABOVE S91 S92 S93 S94 S95 551 SF S2 545 SF S2 592 SF S1 588 SF S1 593 SF S1 1057 SF B6 800 SF A1 811 SF A2 782 SF A5 785 SF A6 1043 SF B2 876 SF A7 764 SF A4 716 SF A4 1050 SF B3 1246 SF ROOF DECK 802 SF A3 1220 SF B5 1046 SF B1 98 SF TRASH 140 SF ELEC 146 SF STORAGE 347 SF STORAGE 2094 SF CORRIODR 187 SF STAIR 2 197 SF STAIR 1 161 SF ELEV 207 SF STORAGE 61 SF BALCONY 55 SF BALCONY 49 SF BALCONY 49 SF BALCONY 120 SF BALCONY 42 SF BALCONY 42 SF BALCONY 108 SF BALCONY 6' - 0"41 SF BALCONY 41 SF BALCONY 6 ' - 0 " 58 SF BALCONY 6' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"3 4 ' - 4 1 /2 " 3 9 ' - 1 1 " 126' - 8 1/2"6' - 3 1/2"7 8 ' - 7 " 1 9 ' - 0 "2' - 7"4' - 10 1/2"6' - 0"30' - 9 1/2"18' - 5 1/2"49' - 3 1/2"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:52:58 AM 5898.00 Author Checker LEVEL 7 A2.5200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 LEVEL 7 N0 4'2'16'8' 3 A4.1 1 A4.3 1 A4.4A3.1 1 A3.4 1 A3.21 A3.3 1 1 A4.2 4' - 10 59/256"ELEV STAIR 1 TRASH EXHAUST S L O P E S L O P E SLOPES L O P E S L O P E SLOPE SLOPE ROOF CANOPY ROOF CANOPY ROOF CANOPY ROOF CANOPYROOF CANOPY ROOF CANOPY TRELLIS 42" HIGH SCREEN WALL AT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 42" HIGH SCREEN WALL AT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 42" HIGH SCREEN WALL AT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT4' - 10 1/2"6 ' - 3 "ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:00 AM 5898.00 Author Checker ROOF PLAN A2.6200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF PLAN N0 4'2'16'8' ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:01 AM 5898.00 Author Checker UNIT PLANS - STUDIOS A2.7200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT S1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT S2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT S3 UNIT S1 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 S1 588 SF 1 Level 3 S1 592 SF 2 Level 4 S1 588 SF 1 Level 4 S1 592 SF 1 Level 4 S1 593 SF 1 Level 5 S1 588 SF 1 Level 5 S1 592 SF 1 Level 5 S1 593 SF 1 Level 6 S1 588 SF 1 Level 6 S1 592 SF 1 Level 6 S1 593 SF 1 Level 7 S1 588 SF 1 Level 7 S1 592 SF 1 Level 7 S1 593 SF 1 15 UNIT S2 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 S2 545 SF 1 Level 3 S2 551 SF 1 Level 4 S2 545 SF 1 Level 4 S2 551 SF 1 Level 5 S2 545 SF 1 Level 5 S2 551 SF 1 Level 6 S2 545 SF 1 Level 6 S2 551 SF 1 Level 7 S2 545 SF 1 Level 7 S2 551 SF 1 10 UNIT S3 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 S3 530 SF 1 1 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:03 AM 5898.00 Author Checker UNIT PLANS - ONE BEDROOMS A2.8200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAUNIT A1 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A1 800 SF 1 Level 4 A1 800 SF 1 Level 5 A1 800 SF 1 Level 6 A1 800 SF 1 Level 7 A1 800 SF 1 5 UNIT A2 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A2 811 SF 1 Level 4 A2 811 SF 1 Level 5 A2 811 SF 1 Level 6 A2 811 SF 1 Level 7 A2 811 SF 1 5 UNIT A3 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A3 802 SF 1 Level 4 A3 802 SF 1 Level 5 A3 802 SF 1 Level 6 A3 802 SF 1 Level 7 A3 802 SF 1 5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT A3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 UNIT A4 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 5 UNIT A5 UNIT A4 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A4 716 SF 1 Level 3 A4 766 SF 1 Level 4 A4 716 SF 1 Level 4 A4 764 SF 1 Level 5 A4 716 SF 1 Level 5 A4 764 SF 1 Level 6 A4 716 SF 1 Level 6 A4 764 SF 1 Level 7 A4 716 SF 1 Level 7 A4 764 SF 1 10 UNIT A5 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A5 782 SF 1 Level 4 A5 782 SF 1 Level 5 A5 782 SF 1 Level 6 A5 782 SF 1 Level 7 A5 782 SF 1 5 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:04 AM 5898.00 Author Checker UNIT PLANS - ONE BEDROOMS A2.9200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A7 UNIT A6 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 A6 778 SF 1 Level 4 A6 785 SF 1 Level 5 A6 785 SF 1 Level 6 A6 785 SF 1 Level 7 A6 785 SF 1 5 UNIT A7 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 4 A7 876 SF 1 Level 5 A7 876 SF 1 Level 6 A7 876 SF 1 Level 7 A7 876 SF 1 4 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:07 AM 5898.00 Author Checker UNIT PLANS - TWO BEDROOMS A2.10200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT B1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT B2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT B3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 UNIT B4 UNIT B1 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B1 1046 SF 1 Level 4 B1 1046 SF 1 Level 5 B1 1046 SF 1 Level 6 B1 1046 SF 1 Level 7 B1 1046 SF 1 5 UNIT B2 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B2 1043 SF 1 Level 4 B2 1043 SF 1 Level 5 B2 1043 SF 1 Level 6 B2 1043 SF 1 Level 7 B2 1043 SF 1 5 UNIT B3 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B3 1050 SF 1 Level 4 B3 1050 SF 1 Level 5 B3 1050 SF 1 Level 6 B3 1050 SF 1 Level 7 B3 1050 SF 1 5 UNIT B4 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B4 1089 SF 1 Level 4 B4 1088 SF 1 Level 5 B4 1088 SF 1 Level 6 B4 1088 SF 1 4 DEN ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:08 AM 5898.00 Author Checker UNIT PLANS - TWO BEDROOMS A2.11200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT B5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT B6 UNIT B5 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B5 1220 SF 1 Level 4 B5 1220 SF 1 Level 5 B5 1207 SF 1 Level 6 B5 1220 SF 1 Level 7 B5 1220 SF 1 5 UNIT B6 LEVEL NAME AREA COUNT Level 3 B6 1056 SF 1 Level 4 B6 1056 SF 1 Level 5 B6 1057 SF 1 Level 6 B6 1057 SF 1 Level 7 B6 1057 SF 1 5 Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 1 A4.4 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.69 15' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 2 1/4"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"85' - 0"OVERRUN6' - 3"4 6 86410108644 1 97 13 44 299 10 1012 121299 6 6 4 1010 AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE1' - 0" 13 13 COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND 14 14 7 BRICK KEY LEGEND BOARDFORMED CONCRETE METAL PANEL - GRAY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - GRAY VERTICAL RIBBED EXTERIOR SOFFIT - BROWN 16/20 SAND FINISH WHITE PLASTER PERFORATED METAL SCREEN VINYL WINDOW STOREFRONT GLASS RAILING JULIET VERTICAL PICKET RAILING ALUMINUM CANOPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - SMOOTH, MIDNIGHT BLUE13 CONCRETE LEDGE14 16/20 SAND FINISH CHARCOAL GREY PLASTER15 ACRYLIC LIT PANEL16ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:23 AM 5898.00 Author Checker WEST ELEVATION A3.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 WEST ELEVATION Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.6910' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"OVERRUN6' - 3"MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"4686410108644 1 9724 AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE 1' - 0" 12 14 TOP OF PARAPET 12 12 15 8 6 12 BRICK KEY LEGEND BOARDFORMED CONCRETE METAL PANEL - GRAY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - GRAY VERTICAL RIBBED EXTERIOR SOFFIT - BROWN 16/20 SAND FINISH WHITE PLASTER PERFORATED METAL SCREEN VINYL WINDOW STOREFRONT GLASS RAILING JULIET VERTICAL PICKET RAILING ALUMINUM CANOPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - SMOOTH, MIDNIGHT BLUE13 CONCRETE LEDGE14 16/20 SAND FINISH CHARCOAL GREY PLASTER15 ACRYLIC LIT PANEL16ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:40 AM 5898.00 Author Checker NORTH ELEVATION A3.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 1 A4.4 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.6910' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"OVERRUN6' - 3"16 913327158 15466 2 4 AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE 1' - 0"14 14 8 OUTLINE OF RAMP BEYOND WALL 16 BRICK KEY LEGEND BOARDFORMED CONCRETE METAL PANEL - GRAY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - GRAY VERTICAL RIBBED EXTERIOR SOFFIT - BROWN 16/20 SAND FINISH WHITE PLASTER PERFORATED METAL SCREEN VINYL WINDOW STOREFRONT GLASS RAILING JULIET VERTICAL PICKET RAILING ALUMINUM CANOPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - SMOOTH, MIDNIGHT BLUE13 CONCRETE LEDGE14 16/20 SAND FINISH CHARCOAL GREY PLASTER15 ACRYLIC LIT PANEL16ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:53:58 AM 5898.00 Author Checker EAST ELEVATION A3.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.6910' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"OVERRUN6' - 3"8 212 64 129 3 7 711 8864410 10 11 AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE1414 1' - 0" 12 BRICK KEY LEGEND BOARDFORMED CONCRETE METAL PANEL - GRAY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - GRAY VERTICAL RIBBED EXTERIOR SOFFIT - BROWN 16/20 SAND FINISH WHITE PLASTER PERFORATED METAL SCREEN VINYL WINDOW STOREFRONT GLASS RAILING JULIET VERTICAL PICKET RAILING ALUMINUM CANOPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - SMOOTH, MIDNIGHT BLUE13 CONCRETE LEDGE14 16/20 SAND FINISH CHARCOAL GREY PLASTER15 ACRYLIC LIT PANEL16ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:16 AM 5898.00 Author Checker SOUTH ELEVATION A3.4200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.69 10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"CONC. TO PLY10' - 1"UTILITYBIKE STORAGE UTILITYLOBBY COR. COR. COR. COR. COR. COR. STORAGE 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD STOR.PARKING 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD ROOF DECK STORAGE RETAILRETAIL TRASH COR. COURTYARD FUTURE CALTRAIN PLAZA AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91 MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"OVERRUN6' - 3"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:18 AM 5898.00 Author Checker BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Section 2 1 Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 1 A4.4 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.69 10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"CONC. TO PLY10' - 1"2 BD TRASH ROOM STORAGE ST ST ST ST ST ELEC ELEC ELEC ELEC ELEC STOR.COR. STOR.COR. STOR.COR. STOR.COR. STOR.COR. 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD PARKING MECHANICAL CAR LIFT PARKING PARKING RETAIL STORAGE 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BDSUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT PARKING 7' - 5"CLR7' - 0"ST ST ST ST CORRIDOR UNISEX SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT COR. COR. COR. COR. COR. CALTRAIN PLAZA 6' - 6"2' - 0"AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91 MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"95.92 102.42 2' - 0"4' - 6"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:19 AM 5898.00 Author Checker BUILDING SECTIONS A4.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Section 7 1 Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.69 10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"CONC. TO PLY10' - 1"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD PARKING PARKING MECHANICAL CAR LIFT LOBBY 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 6' - 6"2' - 0"6' - 11"AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91 MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"OVERRUN6' - 3"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:21 AM 5898.00 Author Checker BUILDING SECTIONS A4.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Section 3 1 Level 1 100.42 Level 2 115.42 Level 3 127.42 Level 4 137.61 Level 6 157.77 Level 7 167.86 B.O.T. 176.84 Level 5 147.69 PARKING PARKINGRETAIL 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD SUPPORT CORRIDOR SUPPORT CORRIDOR SUPPORT CORRIDOR SUPPORT CORRIDOR SUPPORT CORRIDOR 10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 1"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 0"15' - 0"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLATE HT.9' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"PLY TO PLY10' - 1"CONC. TO PLATE10' - 1"BUILDING HEIGHT83' - 1"AVERAGE ELEV. 99.91 MAX ALLOWED85' - 0"ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:22 AM 5898.00 Author Checker BUILDING SECTIONS A4.4200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CASCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Section 4 1 ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:22 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:23 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.2200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:24 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.3200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:25 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.4200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:26 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.5200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:26 AM 5898.00 Author Checker 3D RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A5.6200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:54:27 AM 5898.00 Author Checker MATERIALS BOARD A6.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON.PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.23535898.00_ARCH_200 AIRPORT_V2018 4/14/2019 10:55:29 AM 5898.00 Author Checker SUN SHADE STUDIES A7.1200 AIRPORTAPARTMENTS200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA9AM: 0% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING *EXISTING HIGHWAY ALSO SHADING PLAZA SUMMER SOLSTICE SPRING/FALL EQUINOX WINTER SOLSTICE 12PM: 20% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING 3PM: 40% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING 9AM: 15% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING *EXISTING HIGHWAY ALSO SHADING PLAZA 12PM: 45% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING 3PM: 80% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING 9AM: 30% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING *EXISTING HIGHWAY ALSO SHADING PLAZA 12PM: 60% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING 3PM: 90% COVERAGE OF PLAZA FROM PROPOSED BUILDING DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.1 32’16’8’4’0’ COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE PLAN AIRPORT BOULEVARD BAYSHO R E F R E E W A Y GRAND AVE.CALTRA I N ROOF TERRACE • see enlargement, sheet L.4 PODIUM COURTYARD • see enlargement, sheet L.3 NOTE: All plans to comply with the City of South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan and Section 20.300.007 of the Zoning Ordinance PROPOSED 150 AIRPORT APARTMENTS LIMIT OF WORK T NOT A PART PROPERTY LINE ENTRY DRIVE PER APPROVED 150 AIRPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PLANS. (NOT A PART) CALTRAIN PLAZA PER SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION IMPROVEMENT PLANS. (NOT A PART) GROUND LEVEL • see sheet L.2 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.2 0’5’20’10’ GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN AIRPORT BOULEVARD NOTE: The mature height of all shrubbery shall be no higher than two feet, if so, it shall be maintained at a maximum height of two feet, and tree canopies shall be no lower than six feet above grade. SCREEN PLANTING at GARAGE BIKE RACKS per CITY STANDARD • 3 racks, 6 bikes total • to be inverted “U” design or allow (2) locking points BENCHES & POTTERY • per City standard EXISTING BILLBOARD LIMIT OF WORK NOT A PART PROPERTY LINE CALTRAIN PLAZA PER SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION IMPROVEMENT PLANS. (MODIFIED) (NOT A PART) ENTRY DRIVE PER APPROVED 150 AIRPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PLANS. (NOT A PART) RETAILBIKE STORAGE LOBBY MAIL BIKE RACKS per CITY STANDARD • 3 racks, 6 bikes total • to be inverted “U” design or allow (2) locking points STREET TREES in TREE GRATES to MATCH APPROVED 150 PLANS CITY STANDARD STREET LIGHT SEE SHEET L.8. FINAL LOCATION per ELECTRICAL ENGINEER’S PLANS 200 GARAGE ENTRY DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.3 8’4’2’0’ LEVEL 3 PODIUM COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT AIRPORT BOULEVARD FIRESIDE CHAT • fire pit • lounge furniture • pottery • soft seating CONCRETE PAVERS, TYP. GLASS PARAPET BARRIER RAISED METAL PLANTER ACCESS to CORRIDOR WATER QUALITY PLANTER per CIVIL ENGINEER’S PLANS WATER QUALITY PLANTER per CIVIL ENGINEER’S PLANS ENLARGED PATIO, TYP. ACCENT TREE in RAISED PLANTER SOCIAL DINING • overhead with pendant lights • TV • group dining table • barbecues DIRECT ACCESS GATE for RESIDENT RESIDENT’S UNIT RESIDENT’S UNIT DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.4 8’4’2’0’ LEVEL 7 ROOF TERRACE ENLARGEMENT ACCESS to CORRIDOR HANGING LOUNGE • hanging chairs • dining table • hanging pots • pendant lights THE LOOKOUT • private seating area • pottery • downtown & mountain views FIRESIDE LOUNGE • fireplace • lounge furniture • festival lighting OVERHEAD SHADE STRUCTURE per ARCHITECTURAL PLANS LOW PARAPET WALL with GLASS on TOP BARBECUE STATIOIN DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.5 8’4’2’0’ LIFESTYLE IMAGERY DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.6 COMPOSITE PLANTING PLAN & PLANT PALETTE 0’5’20’10’ TREES BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE FIELD2 QTY ACER PALMATUM 'SANGO KAKU' JAPANESE MAPLE 24"BOX MEDIUM 3 LAURUS NOBILIS COLUMNAR SWEET BAY 24"BOX LOW 14 MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA `D.D. BLANCHARD` TM SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 36"BOX MEDIUM 5 METROSIDEROS EXCELSA NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE PER PLAN LOW 2 OLEA EUROPAEA `SWAN HILL` TM SWAN HILL OLIVE 36"BOX LOW 2 SHRUBS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS QTY AGAVE X `BLUE FLAME` BLUE FLAME AGAVE 15 GAL LOW 5 GREVILLEA X `NOELLII` GREVILLEA 5 GAL LOW 49 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA `BREEZE` DWARF MAT RUSH 5 GAL LOW 42 PHORMIUM X `DUET` NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL LOW 13 PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM `SILVER SHEEN` TAWHIWHI 5 GAL MEDIUM 9 PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA `WHEELER`S DWARF` DWARF PITTOSPORUM 5 GAL MEDIUM 6 PRUNUS CAROLINIANA `COMPACTA` CAROLINA CHERRY 15 GAL LOW 2 RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA `MINOR` YEDDA HAWTHORN 5 GAL LOW 69 ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS `HUNTINGTON CARPET` HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY 5 GAL LOW 16 GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT WUCOLS QTY CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM `EL CAMPO` CAPE RUSH 5 GAL LOW 49 FESTUCA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA FESCUE 1 GAL LOW 25 MAHONIA REPENS CREEPING MAHONIA 1 GAL MEDIUM 105 ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'PROSTRATUS' ROSEMARY 5 GAL LOW 44 PC R PLANT SCHEDULE * PLANT LIST IS COMPLIANT WITH CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SUCCESSFUL TREE AND PLANT LIST UP DN 8.33% 12% 102.42100.42 100.42 100.42 8% RETAIL 1 MAIL BOXES RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL 4 RETAIL 5 RETAIL 6 RETAIL 7 RETAIL 8 RETAIL 9 RETAIL 10 RETAIL 11 RETAIL 12 RES. 1 RES. 216%RAMP UP RAMP UP 102.42 100.42 50 PARKING SPACES WITH MECHANICAL CAR LIFT 36 BICYCLES - VERTICAL STACKED 12 RETAIL PARKING SPACES 2 RES. PARKING SPACES VAN VAN 99.88 99.88 99.407.62%100.10 3.40% RAMP DN RAMP DN 102.42 102.42 102.42 MECHANICAL FILTRATION BELOW SLAB GREASE INTERCEPTOR UNDER SLAB AIRPORT BOULEVARD RETAIL BIKE STORAGE LOBBY MAIL UTILITY PROPERTY LINE DNUP UP PC PC R RRR R RRR R RRRR R LIMIT OF WORK R R 48"BOX 36"BOX WUCOLS, WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES, IS A UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION PUBLICATION AND IS A GUIDE TO THE WATER NEEDS OF LANDSCAPE PLANTS. WUCOLS NOTE: PLANTING NOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE. PLANTS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS BEING REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OVERALL PLANTING DESIGN INTENT. THIS PLANT PALETTE IS SUGGESTED FOR USE, BUT DOES NOT PRECLUDE USE OF OTHER APPROPRIATE PLANT MATERIAL. WATER-CONSERVING PLANTS AND OTHER CLIMATE APPROPRIATE VARIETIES OF TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO COMPLEMENT THE CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT. ALL PLANTED AREAS ARE TO BE WATERED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER THROUGH CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE AND WATER DISTRICT'S WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WILL PROVIDE THE CONTRACTOR WITH AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PLANTING AREAS REGARDING CARE AND PRUNING OF THE SITE. THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND SUPERVISION REQUIRED TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPED AREAS IN AN ATTRACTIVE CONDITION AND AS DESCRIBED IN T HE PROJECT MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE MINIMUM 3" FIBROUS MULCH OR PEA GRAVEL. NO FLOATABLE BARK ALLOWED. ROOFTOP PODIUM COURTYARD CALTRAIN PLAZA (NOT A PART) T DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.7 HYDROZONE PLAN UP DN 8.33% 12% 102.42100.42 100.42 100.42 8% RETAIL 1 MAIL BOXES RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL 4 RETAIL 5 RETAIL 6 RETAIL 7 RETAIL 8 RETAIL 9 RETAIL 10 RETAIL 11 RETAIL 12 RES. 1 RES. 216%RAMP UP RAMP UP 102.42 100.42 50 PARKING SPACES WITH MECHANICAL CAR LIFT 36 BICYCLES - VERTICAL STACKED 12 RETAIL PARKING SPACES 2 RES. PARKING SPACES VAN VAN 99.88 99.88 99.407.62%100.10 3.40% RAMP DN RAMP DN 102.42 102.42 102.42 MECHANICAL FILTRATION BELOW SLAB GREASE INTERCEPTOR UNDER SLAB DNUP UP AIRPORT BOULEVARD RETAIL PROPERTY LINE LIMIT OF WORK WATER CONSERVATION FEATURES THE FOLLOWING MEASURES WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT TO CONSERVE WATER: 1. INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC 'SMART' IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH RAIN-SENSOR. 2. THE USE OF LOW PRECIPITATION/LOW ANGLE IRRIGATION SPRAY HEADS. 3. THE USE OF LOW VOLUME DRIP TUBING INSTALLED BELOW MULCH. 4. THE USE OF LOW WATER CONSUMING PLANTS. 5. SOIL AMENDMENT TO ACHIEVE GOOD SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION. 6. MULCHING TO REDUCE EVAPOTRANSPORATION FROM THE ROOT ZONE. WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF A MECHANICAL DEVICE TO DISTRIBUTE WATER AND ENSURE PLANT SURVIVAL IN THE MOST EFFICIENT MANNER AND WITHIN A TIME FRAME THAT LEAST INTERFERES WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMUNITY. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR EACH HYDROZONE WILL BE AUTOMATIC AND INCORPORATE LOW VOLUME DRIP EMITTERS, BUBBLERS AND HIGH EFFICIENCY LOW ANGLE SPRAY HEADS AT TURF ONLY. DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MAY BE EMPLOYED WHERE CONSIDERED TO BE EFFECTIVE AND FEASIBLE. IRRIGATION VALVES SHALL BE SEPARATED TO ALLOW FOR THE SYSTEMS OPERATION IN RESPONSE TO ORIENTATION AND EXPOSURE. PLANTING WILL BE DESIGNED TO ENHANCE THE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE SITE AND THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS. PLANTS SHALL BE GROUPED WITH SIMILAR WATER, CLIMATIC AND SOIL REQUIREMENTS TO CONSERVE WATER AND CREATE A DROUGHT RESPONSIVE LANDSCAPE. EACH HYDROZONE CONSISTS OF MODERATE TO LOW WATER CONSUMING PLANTS. IN AREAS OF MODERATE WATER CONSUMING PLANTS THE SHALL BE PROPERLY AMENDED TO RETAIN MOISTURE FOR HEALTHY GROWTH AND TO CONSERVE WATER. PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN EACH HYDROZONE SHALL BE SPECIFIED IN CONSIDERATION OF NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST EXPOSURES. SOIL SHALL BE PREPARED AND EMENDED TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM MOISTURE RETENTION AND PERCOLATION. PLANTED BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO RETAIN SOIL MOISTURE AND REDUCE EVAPOTRANSPORATION. TO AVOID WASTED WATER, THE CONTROLS WILL BE OVERSEEN BY A FLOW MONITOR THAT WILL DETECT ANY BROKEN SPRINKLER HEADS TO STOP THAT STATION'S OPERATION, ADVANCING TO THE NEXT WORKABLE STATION. IN THE EVENT OF PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE BREAKAGE, IT WILL COMPLETELY STOP THE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM. ALL MATERIAL WILL BE NONFERROUS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE BRASS PIPING INTO AND OUT OF THE BACKFLOW UNITS. ALL WORK WILL BE IN THE BEST ACCEPTABLE MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS PREVAILING IN THE INDUSTRY. IRRIGATION HYDROZONES: HYDRO-ZONE 2 - N/E FACING RAISED PLANTERS ON PODIUM - 353 S.F. IRRIGATION TECHNIQUE TREES - BUBBLERS SHRUBS - SUB SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION HYDRO-ZONE 1 - SOUTH/WEST FACING - 1,152 S.F. IRRIGATION TECHNIQUE TREES - BUBBLERS SHRUBS - SUB SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION HYDRO-ZONE 3 - S/W FACING RAISED PLANTERS ON PODIUM - 407 S.F. IRRIGATION TECHNIQUE TREES - BUBBLERS SHRUBS - SUB SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE WATERED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER THROUGH CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND WATER DISTRICT'S WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. IRRIGATION NOTE: ROOFTOP PODIUM COURTYARD 0’5’20’10’ DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.8 CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN UP DN 8.33% 12% 102.42100.42 100.42 100.42 8% RETAIL 1 MAIL BOXES RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL 4 RETAIL 5 RETAIL 6 RETAIL 7 RETAIL 8 RETAIL 9 RETAIL 10 RETAIL 11 RETAIL 12 RES. 1 RES. 216%RAMP UP RAMP UP 102.42 100.42 50 PARKING SPACES WITH MECHANICAL CAR LIFT 36 BICYCLES - VERTICAL STACKED 12 RETAIL PARKING SPACES 2 RES. PARKING SPACES VAN VAN 99.88 99.88 99.407.62%100.10 3.40% RAMP DN RAMP DN 102.42 102.42 102.42 MECHANICAL FILTRATION BELOW SLAB GREASE INTERCEPTOR UNDER SLAB AIRPORT BOULEVARD RETAIL BIKE STORAGE LOBBY MAIL UTILITY DNUP UP DN UP PROPERTY LINE LIMIT OF WORK THE OUTDOOR LIGHTING CONCEPT IS TO PROVIDE LEVELS OF LIGHTING SUFFICIENT TO MEET SAFETY AND ORIENTATION NEEDS. WITHIN PUBLIC AREAS LIGHTING WILL BE WARM COLORED AND UNOBTRUSIVE. LIGHT SOURCES WILL BE TUNGSTEN OR METAL HALIDE. LIGHTING SOURCES FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND PAVED AREAS WILL BE CONCEALED AND THE LIGHTING INDIRECT NOT VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC VIEWPOINT. LIGHT SOURCES SHOULD BE DIRECTED SO THAT IT DOES NOT FALL OUTSIDE THE AREA TO BE LIGHTED. ALL EXTERIOR SURFACE AND ABOVE-GROUND MOUNTED FIXTURES WILL BE SYMPATHETIC AND COMPLIMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME. LIGHTING CONCEPT: EXTERIOR LIGHTING LEGEND TYPE/TECHNIQUE: STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHTS PER CITY STANDARDS LOCATION:SYMBOL POLE LIGHT AT ENTRY DRIVE PENDANT LIGHT MOUNTED ON OVERHEAD TRELLIS OVERHEAD FESTIVAL LIGHTING ATTACHED TO POLES. MINIMUM 12' ABOVE FINISH SURFACEROOFTOP PODIUM COURTYARD 0’5’20’10’ POLE LIGHT PENDANT LIGHT OVERHEAD FESTIVAL LIGHTING DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES:1301 third avenue san diego ca 92101phone 619.239.2353200 AIRPORT200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAN0 4'2'16'8' PJM MS APRIL 12, 2019 2018.09.16 ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #1) 2018.12.03 ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL SET (SUBMITTAL #2) L.9 8’4’2’0’ PLANTING IMAGERY METROSIDEROS EXCELSA NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE ACER PALMATUM ‘SANGO KAKU’ JAPANESE MAPLE AGAVE X ‘BLUE FLAME’ AGAVE BLUE FLAME GREVILLEA X ‘NOELLII’ GREVILLEA PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM ‘SILVER SHEEN’ TAWHIWHI LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA ‘BREEZE’ DWARF MAT RUSH MAHONIA REPENS CREEPING MAHONIA RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA ‘MINOR’ YEDDA HAWTHORN OLEA ‘SWAN HILL’ FRUITLESS OLIVE PHORMIUM X ‘DUET’ NEW ZELAND FLAX PRUNUS CAROLINIANA ‘COMPACTA’ CAROLINA CHERRY CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM ‘EL CAMPO’ CAPE RUSH LAURUS NOBILIS COLUMNAR SWEET BAY FESTUCA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA FESCUE PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA ‘WHEELER’S DWARF’ DWARF PITTOSPORUM ROSMARINUS OFFICIANLIS ‘HUNTINGTON CARPET’ HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA ‘D.D. BLANCHARD’ SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ‘PROSTRATUS’ ROSEMARY SECTION C SECTION A SECTION B 4/8/2019 200 Airport Project - Community Benefit Analysis The subject property in reference is the 0.55-acre parcel known as 200-214 Airport Boulevard located in South San Francisco, CA. Fairfield Residential is proposing to redevelop the site with a project consisting of 94 apartment homes with approximately 3,600 SF of ground level commercial. The site is zoned Downtown Transit Core (DTC) with a Downtown Station Area Specific Plan overlay. Density within the DTC ranges from 100 du/ac to a maximum of 180 du/ac if the applicant provides Community Benefits. The site is located at the cross streets of Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue, adjacent to the brand new Caltrain Plaza and Platform currently under construction. The site is currently improved with four single story commercial buildings constructed in the 1950’s, two of which are occupied as retail stores (a used furniture store and trophy shop) and some surface parking. The current zoning without providing community benefits would allow up to 55 units to be built on- site. Fairfield Residential is asking for an additional 39 units in increased density to bring the project total to 94 units or 171 du/ac (within the maximum allowable density of 180 du/ac per the DTC zoning). Based on our conversations with City Staff, activation of the soon to be completed CalTrain Plaza is an integral part of the Downtown redevelopment effort and overall vision of the DSASP. Therefore, the redevelopment of the site to maximize use and density in a walkable environment adjacent to the CalTrain Plaza is certainly a positive contribution to the community in itself. In addition to redeveloping this prominent site from four single story 1950’s structures, and creating a 7-story brand new mid-rise mixed-use project, Fairfield proposes the following Community Benefits to achieve the maximum allowable density as allowed under section 20.280.005(A) of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan: • 9 affordable rent restricted units o 9 units restricted at Moderate Annual Median Income rent levels per San Mateo County consisting of 2-Studios, four 1-bedroom and three 2-bedroom. o All affordable units shall the same interior finish levels as the market rate units. The nine restricted apartments will be located on several different levels and orientations within the development. • Agree to participate in the yet to be formed South San Francisco Industrial Area Community Facilities District (IA-CFD) at an annual tax rate of no more than $0.25 per gross project square foot on the 200 Airport Property. • Community serving commercial space located at the new Caltrain Plaza. o The commercial space is being designed to accommodate a variety of uses including an Urban Grocer, restaurant, and/or retail space. The space flexibility includes: 14’+/- interior ceilings, 30’+ building depths giving ample window line exposure, grease interceptor installed and ready for connection with permit, natural gas available to the space, power sources sized to accommodate prospective users. In addition to the above, we will also provide 12 parking spaces adjacent to the commercial space to offer convenient access for those visiting the commercial space and not using CalTrain. • Fairfield would incur up to $50,000 related to plan Design Services and management/coordination for the re-design and enhancement of the Caltrain Plaza to better interface with the new development with the intent of keeping construction cost within the approved plaza budget. Fairfield would either contract directly with those firms already working on the plaza design or cover bills incurred by the City directly related to re-design of the plaza. The initial conceptual re-design would largely re-orient some of the landscape areas and hardscape areas. The current plan includes a heavily landscaped area adjacent to this property in an effort to screen the plaza from the existing improvements. • Ongoing maintenance of the Caltrain Plaza hardscape located in front of the commercial spaces. See attached exhibit for reference. Note, final hardscape area subject to change based on final plaza design. • As an offering of public art, Fairfield would incur approximately $75,000 in added project design and construction costs to produce the DNA window feature on the east elevation of the project. Per Section 20.280.005(A).2, we have analyzed the per unit benefit for each of the 39 units proposed above the allowable base density. Based on our financial analysis, Fairfield Residential would be providing $216,883 per unit in community benefit (See attached Community Benefits Financial Analysis. In addition to the various community benefits being offered , we have also paid $1,668,910 in park fees for our adjacent 150 Airport project and expect to pay just under $1,500,000 in additional park fees for our proposed 200 Airport project. We believe that these monies can be used to cover any cost enhancements to the Caltrain Plaza which may be incurred during the re- design efforts. 200 Airport ‐ Community Benefits AnalysisTotal All In Cost $675 per square footAverage Unit Size 820 square Feet9 Affordable Units $675 x 820 x 9 $4,981,500Commercial Space $675 x 3630 $2,450,250CFD Contribution $901,675 *see CFD Contribution tab for breakdownPublic Art ‐ DNA Design East Elevation  $75,000Caltrain Plaza Design/Mgmt. $50,000Total $8,458,42539 Bonus Units $8,458,425 / 39$216,883Benefit per unit  Gross Project SF Under Construction or DesignedTotal Annual Fee as Proposed       ($0.25/GSF)200 Airport Total SF Currently Designed 144,268                                      36,067$                                                      Value Loss at 4% Cap Value Loss at 4.25% Cap Value Loss at 4.5% Cap200 Airport (901,675.00)$                             (848,635.29)$                                              (801,488.89)$                                 Value Loss Per Unit 4% Cap Value Loss Per Unit 4.25% Cap Value Loss Per Unit 4.5% CapAverage Per Unit Total ‐ 39 Bonus Units (23,119.87)$                               (21,759.88)$                                                (20,551.00)$                                   South San Francisco Proposed CFD ‐ Fairfield Residential Project ImpactsPer Year ImpactProject Value Impact ART with HISTORICAL NOD LANDSCAPE BUFFER • Grand Avenue screening • flowering accent trees • terraced landscape walls FOOD TRUCK STAGING AREA PLAZA ENTRY • seatwall • removable bollards E. GRAND AVE.CENTRAL GREEN • multi-purpose lawn (1,850 s.f.) • games • retail spillout • specimen tree • festival lights attached to poles • monument sign URBAN GROCER RETAIL PATIO with LOUVERED FENCE (820s.f.) NEIGHBORHOOD KIOSK SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING • bike racks - (4) total, (8) short-term parking space SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING • bike racks - (2) total, (4) short-term parking spaces LIGHT POLE 200 AIRPORT PLAZA - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA FAIRFIELD RESIDENTIAL JANUARY 11, 2019 16’8’4’2’0’ PLAZA OPTION 1 (URBAN GROCER) - 4 AIRPORT BOULEVARD BEGIN TUNNEL Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Development at 200 Airport Boulevard in South San Francisco, CA Prepared for: FF Realty III, LLC April 12, 2019 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Hexagon Office: 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95113 Hexagon Job Number:18TD03 Phone: 408.971.6100 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Table of Contents 1.  Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1  2. Existing Transportation Facilities ..................................................................................................... 4  3.  Parking ........................................................................................................................................... 11  4.  TDM Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 13  List of Tables Table 1 Vehicular Parking Spaces Requirement .............................................................................. 11  Table 2 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................ 13  Table 3  Proposed TDM Measures for 200 Airport Boulevard ........................................................... 15  Table 4 Estimated Trip Reductions ................................................................................................... 21 List of Figures Figure 1  Site Location .......................................................................................................................... 3  Figure 2  Existing Bicycle Network ........................................................................................................ 9  Figure 3  Existing Transit Service ....................................................................................................... 10  200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 1 1. Introduction Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is a combination of services, incentives, facilities, and actions that reduce single–occupant vehicle (SOV) trips to help relieve traffic congestion, parking demand, and air pollution problems. The purpose of TDM is to (1) reduce the amount of traffic generated by new development; (2) promote more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities and ensure that new developments are designed to maximize the potential for alternative transportation usage; (3) reduce the parking demand generated by new development and allow for a reduction in parking supply; and (4) establish an ongoing monitoring and enforcement program to guarantee the desired trip and parking reductions are achieved. The main purpose of the proposed TDM plan for the 200 Airport Boulevard (project) is to evaluate the parking reduction requirements outlined in Section 20.330.007 (Downtown Parking) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. The code states that for the Downtown Parking District, the Planning Commission shall review any request for a reduction in the number of required parking spaces and make a determination whether there is sufficient parking within the District to accommodate the proposed use. The City of South San Francisco may reduce the required number of parking spaces for a project, so long as (1) the reduction in parking will not adversely affect surrounding projects; (2) the reduction in parking will not rely upon or reduce the public parking supply; and (3) the project provides a detailed TDM plan and demonstrates that the TDM program can be maintained indefinitely. In accordance with City goals to reduce the number of vehicle trips during peak commute hours, this TDM Plan seeks to reduce the parking demand through a combination of appropriate measures to promote alternative forms of transportation. The project proposes to provide less on-site parking than what is typically required for downtown residential developments. Project Description The proposed project consists of one building with 94 dwelling units and 3,630 square feet (s.f.) of commercial uses. The project site is bordered by Airport Boulevard to the west, the proposed Caltrain Plaza to the north, Caltrain tracks to the east, and the recently approved residential development (150 Airport Boulevard) to the south. Access to the project would be provided via a signalized driveway on Airport Boulevard. This driveway would be located on the east side of the signalized intersection of Airport Boulevard and Baden Avenue and would provide shared access to the proposed project and the recently approved residential development at 150 Airport Boulevard. The project site location and the surrounding study area are shown on Figure 1. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 2 Downtown Location and Proximity to Transit Also called location efficiency, the location of a project within or adjacent to a central business district promotes pedestrian and bicycle travel in a high-density area of complementary land uses. The project is located in the Downtown Transit Core (DTC) and will provide development and density within a ½- mile radius of the Caltrain Station, which will promote ridership and reduce emissions. The project would provide high-quality residential opportunities for younger employees and older retirees who desire a convenient downtown location, and increase the population close to Grand Avenue to support nearby business, consistent with the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan’s (DSASP) goals. Also, the project site is located within one quarter mile of four SamTrans bus routes. Chapter 2 describes the existing transit services in the study area. Report Organization The remainder of this report is divided into two chapters. Chapter 2 describes the transportation facilities and services in the vicinity of the project site. Chapter 3 describes parking proposed by the project. Chapter 4 presents the TDM plan that will be implemented for the proposed project, including the program for implementing and monitoring the TDM plan. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 4 2. Existing Transportation Facilities Transportation facilities and services that support sustainable modes of transportation include SamTrans bus routes, BART, Caltrain, shuttles, pedestrian facilities, and bicycle facilities. This chapter describes the existing facilities and services near the 200 Airport Boulevard project site. Information on the nearby roadway network is also included in order to provide a more comprehensive description of the nearby transportation network. Roadway Network Regional access to the project study area is provided by US 101. US 101 is a north-south major freeway through eastern San Mateo County between San Francisco and San Jose. It is the primary north/south route connection to I-280 and I-80 north of South San Francisco. US-101 is typically congested in both directions during both peak periods as people commute to and from San Francisco and the Silicon Valley. Access to the freeway from the project site is provided via interchanges at Miller Avenue, Airport Boulevard, and E. Grand Avenue. The following roadways provide local access to the site: Airport Boulevard is a major north/south arterial route through South San Francisco parallel to US-101. North of Grand Avenue, Airport Boulevard has two travel lanes in each direction. Airport Boulevard provides access to the site via Baden Avenue. Baden Avenue is primarily a two-lane local roadway that extends from Chestnut Avenue in the west to Airport Boulevard in the east. It widens to a four-lane roadway between Linden Avenue and Airport Boulevard. Direct access to the project would be provided by extending Baden Avenue to the east of Airport Boulevard. The east leg would provide access to the proposed project on the north side and the approved 150 Airport Boulevard residential development on the south side. Grand Avenue is a two- to six-lane roadway that extends from Mission Road to its termination point at Point San Bruno Park. West of US-101, Grand Avenue has one travel lane in each direction with on- street angled parking on both sides of the street. Miller Avenue is a two-lane local roadway that extends west from Airport Boulevard and terminates at Chestnut Avenue. There are traffic signals at its intersections with Airport Boulevard, Spruce Avenue, and Walnut Avenue, but the other intersections are controlled by stop signs. Linden Avenue is a two-lane local roadway that extends north from San Mateo Avenue at the city limits and terminates at Airport Boulevard. There are traffic signals at most major intersections with the 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 5 remainder of its intersections controlled by stop signs. Linden Avenue intersects Baden Avenue, Grand Avenue, and Miller Avenue in the vicinity of the project site. Gateway Boulevard is a four-lane north/south roadway that extends between Oyster Point in the north and Mitchell Avenue in the south, east of US 101. It is the northern extension of South Airport Boulevard. Existing Bicycle Facilities Bicycle facilities include bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. Bike paths (Class I facilities) are pathways, separate from roadways, which are designated for use by bicycles. Often, these pathways also allow pedestrian access. Bike lanes (Class II facilities) are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bike routes (Class III) are existing rights-of-way that accommodate bicycles but are not separate from the existing travel lanes. Routes are typically designated only with signs. According to the Bicycle Master Plan, the City has 48.3 miles of existing bikeways, though most of them are not signed (see Figure 2). Transit stations, schools, parks and retail centers are all accessible by these bikeways. The following bicycle facilities exist in the project study area. Class I Bikeway (Multi-Use Path)  Grand Avenue has a bike path that extends from Industrial Way, crosses over East Grand Avenue and ends at Harbor Way. This path connects to Class II bike lanes that begin on Gateway Boulevard south of Grand Avenue. Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane)  Airport Boulevard has Class II bike lanes in both directions that begin north of Miller Avenue and connect to the Class III bicycle routes on Miller Avenue and Linden Avenue.  Gateway Boulevard has Class II bike lanes in both directions that begin south of Grand Avenue and extend to South Airport Boulevard.  Grand Avenue has Class II bike lanes in both directions that begin west of Spruce Avenue and connect to the Class III bicycle route on Spruce Avenue.  Railroad Avenue has a Class II bike lane in the eastbound direction that extends east from Spruce Avenue to Maple Avenue, after which it becomes a Class III bicycle route with sharrows. This lane connects to the Class III bicycle route on Spruce Avenue. Class III Bikeway (Bike Route)  San Mateo Avenue is a Class III bicycle route without sharrow markings. The route extends from Airport Boulevard past South Linden Avenue, connecting to the Class III bicycle route on Linden Avenue.  Linden Avenue is a Class III bicycle route without sharrow markings. The route extends south from Airport Boulevard to San Mateo Avenue.  Spruce Avenue is a Class III bicycle route with sharrow markings between Grand Avenue and Victory Way. The route connects to Class II bicycle lanes on Grand Avenue. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 6 The City of South San Francisco adopted its Citywide bicycle master plan in 2010, the goal of which is to expand the bicycle network to make it easier and safer for people to bicycle through the City. In the project vicinity, bike lanes are planned in both directions on Airport Boulevard between Miller Avenue and San Mateo Avenue. Bike lanes are also planned in both directions on Grand Avenue between Spruce Avenue and Airport Boulevard. As part of the proposed Caltrain Station reconstruction, a new ped/bike rail crossing tunnel is proposed at the Grand Avenue/Airport Boulevard intersection that would directly connect to the South San Francisco Caltrain station. The new ped/bike tunnel would also provide a good bicycle connection between the downtown and the employment zone to the east of US 101. Existing Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks are provided on most streets in the immediate vicinity of the project. Sidewalks exist in both directions on Airport Boulevard and on the south side of Grand Avenue along the project frontage. In the immediate vicinity of the project, crosswalks exist at the signalized intersections of Airport Boulevard/Baden Avenue and Airport Boulevard/Grand Avenue for pedestrians to get to downtown destinations. Pedestrian access improvements are proposed in the area covered under the Specific Plan and citywide under the South San Francisco Pedestrian Master Plan. The plan calls for area-wide improvements, such as establishing a Downtown pedestrian-priority zone, making pedestrian-friendly alley improvements to Downtown lanes and completing the street grid to reduce block lengths immediately surrounding the Caltrain station. Existing Transit Service Transit services in the study area include local buses, express buses, shuttles, BART, Caltrain and ferry service. A majority of the public transit trips through the area are commuters who use the Caltrain station or connect from BART to Downtown and East of US-101 employers via employer shuttles. Employer sponsored shuttles connect to employment destinations east of the Caltrain station and other commuter connections in the area. These shuttles are available to individual riders not associated with sponsor employers for a monthly fee. See Figure 3 for the existing transit services. SamTrans Bus Routes Route 292 stops at the Airport Boulevard/Grand Avenue, and Airport Boulevard/Baden Avenue intersections. The route provides connection between Downtown San Francisco to the north and Brisbane, South San Francisco, Burlingame and San Mateo to the south. This line provides service in both directions between 4:00 AM and 2:00 AM, with 20- to 30-minute headways during peak weekday Route 130 stops at the Linden Avenue/Grand Avenue intersection and provides service between Downtown South San Francisco, South San Francisco BART station, and Daly City. This line provides service in both directions between 5:00 AM and 10:00 PM with 15-minute headways during peak weekday hours. Route 397 stops at the Airport Boulevard/Baden Avenue intersection and connects to Downtown San Francisco to the north and Palo Alto Transit Center to the south. This line provides service between 1:00 AM and 6:00 AM with 60-minute headways. This route does not operate mid-day or evenings. South SF Shuttle (SCS) is operated by SamTrans and provides free service between the South San Francisco BART Station and the downtown Monday through Friday between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. The shuttle stops at the Linden Avenue/Grand Avenue intersection, which is within walking distance (less than 1,000 feet) of the project. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 7 BART Service Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) operates regional rail service in the Bay Area, connecting between San Francisco International Airport and the Millbrae Intermodal Station to the south, San Francisco to the north, and cities in the East Bay. The BART stations closest to the South San Francisco Caltrain station area are the San Bruno Station located near Huntington Avenue east of El Camino Real, and the South San Francisco Station, located on Mission Road and McLellan Drive. Both stations are located within 3 miles of the South San Francisco Caltrain station, and SamTrans provides service from the BART stations to Downtown South San Francisco. BART trains operate on 15-minute headways during peak hours and 20-minute headways during off-peak hours Caltrain Caltrain provides commuter rail service between San Francisco and Gilroy. The project is located less than 0.25 miles (walking distance) southwest of the South San Francisco Caltrain station, which is located at 590 Dubuque Avenue, on the east side of US-101, immediately north of East Grand Avenue. The South San Francisco Caltrain Station serves local and limited trains. Weekday peak commute headways are between 20 and 60 minutes, with more frequent service for AM northbound and PM southbound trips. Currently, the only access to the South San Francisco Caltrain station is from the west side of the train tracks, via the Grand Avenue overpass. This overpass requires a long and circuitous detour for people walking and bicycling, who have to cross Grand Avenue and descend either a tall metal staircase or walk/bike along Dubuque Avenue. Recently, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA) Board awarded a $59 million grant for station reconstruction to improve safety and connectivity to nearby businesses. The station reconstruction will include widening the center platform and building a pedestrian tunnel to connect the station directly to the east end of downtown’s Grand Avenue. Passengers will be able to get to the station’s center platform via ramps connecting to a tunnel underneath the tracks. The tunnel will connect to a pedestrian plaza at Grand Avenue and Airport Boulevard on the west side of the tracks and a transit plaza at the end of three-lane Grand Avenue on the east side of the tracks. Busses and shuttles will pick up and drop off Caltrain passengers from the new east-side plaza instead of the parking lot on the west side of the station. This will save time for passengers commuting to the City’s biotech job center on the east side of the tracks. The pedestrian plaza on Grand Avenue would be located just north of the project. East of US-101 Area Shuttles  The Oyster Point Caltrain Shuttle connects the South San Francisco Caltrain station to Oyster Point, Forbes Boulevard and Eccles Avenue. This line provides service during peak commute hours, between 6:30 AM and 10:00 AM, and between 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM with 30-minute headways.  The Utah-Grand Caltrain Shuttle connects South San Francisco Caltrain station to East Grand Avenue and Utah Avenue. This line provides service during peak commute hours, between 5:30 AM and 9:30 AM, and between 4:00 PM and 6:15 PM with 30-minute headways. Bus Stops The nearest bus stop for Route 130 and SCS is located near the Grand Avenue/Linden Avenue intersection, which is less than 1,000 feet walking distance from the project site. The nearest bus stops for Routes 292 and Route 397 going northbound are located on Airport Boulevard, just south of Baden 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 8 Avenue, and the nearest stops for Route 292 and Route 397 going south bound are located on Airport Boulevard, just south of Grand Avenue. The shuttle services can be accessed at the Caltrain station, which is within walking distance of the project. Continuous sidewalks are present for pedestrians walking between the proposed project and the nearest bus stops. 200 Airport Boulevard TDM - South San Francisco, CA Figure 3 Existing Transit Facilities South San Francisco Caltrain Station Maple AveSpruce AveSan Mateo AveS Linden AveVictory A v e N Can a l St Mayfair Ave Grand Av e Industrial WayGateway BlvdE Grand Ave Airport BlvdMitchel Ave Utah Av e S A i rpo r t B lvd S Canal St Linden AveLowrie AveRailroad Av e 1st Ln Commercial Ave 2nd Ln Baden Ave 3rd Ln Miller A v e 4th Ln Lux Ave Tamarack L n P a r k W y 6th Ln 7th Ln 4th Ln Cypress AveCalifornia A v e Grand AveMaple Ave101 LEGEND = Project Site Location = New Caltrain Plaza = SamTrans Routes Connecting to BART Stations = SamTrans School-day Only Routes = SamTrans Routes Connecting to Caltrain Stations = SamTrans Routes Connecting to BART and Caltrain Stations 37 37 130 130 130 141 292 397 292 292 397 141 141 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 11 3. Parking The South San Francisco Municipal Code includes parking requirements for mixed-use projects comprising residential and retail components within the Downtown Plan Area (Section 20.330.007). The parking requirements are as follows: 1 space per 400 s.f. of floor area of general retail space, 1 space per studio unit, 1.0 space per one-bedroom unit, 1.5 spaces per two-bedroom unit, and 1.5 spaces per three-bedroom unit. The project as proposed would construct one mixed-use building comprising a total of 94 units (26 studio units, 39 one-bedroom units, and 44 two-bedroom units) and 3,630 square feet of retail. Based on the municipal code, this would equate to 109 residential spaces and 9 retail spaces for a total minimum parking requirement of 118 spaces. The vehicular parking requirements are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Vehicular Parking Spaces Requirement According to the project site plan, the project would provide a total of 110 parking spaces: 12 spaces serving retail and guests, 50 car stackers, and 48 standard spaces. The proposed parking supply would meet the City’s retail parking requirements. There would be a deficit of 11 spaces for the residential parking. However, given the project’s location and its proximity to the Caltrain station, it is expected that many residents would use public transportation and would not need a car. Also, the project will Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement per studio unit 1 26 units 26 per 1 bedroom unit 1 39 units 39 per 2 bedroom unit 1.5 29 units 44 109 Retail Parking per 400 sf 1 3,630 9 Total 118 Notes: SF = square feet 1 Vehicular parking requirements per Table 20.330.007 of the South San Francisco Municpal Code Parking Rate 1 Resident Parking Subtotal Required Spaces Project Size 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 12 implement a comprehensive TDM plan, as described in Chapter 4 to reduce the project’s parking demand. Since parking for the retail uses would be short-term, the retail parking areas should be signed for two- hour parking during business hours. This would help with parking turnover and keep spaces available for customers and visitors. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 13 4. TDM Plan The TDM measures to be implemented for the 200 Airport Boulevard project include design features, programs, and services that promote sustainable modes of transportation and reduce the roadway and parking demand that would be generated by the project. The City’s Municipal Code requires all nonresidential development expected to generate 100 or more average daily trips to implement a transportation demand management (TDM) program to reduce the number of vehicle trips by increasing access to and use of alternative modes of transportation, including transit, bicycling, and walking. The City’s Municipal Code does not apply to residential projects, however, as shown in Table 2, the number of daily trips for retail uses exceeds 100 trips, even with the 20% trip reduction from the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. The proposed project also does not meet the minimum required number of parking spaces, therefore a TDM Plan is required in order to reduce parking demand. Table 2 Project Trip Generation Table 3 presents a summary of the measures proposed in this plan, along with an indication of who will have primary responsibility for implementing each measure. All measures will be implemented upon occupancy of the building. The project site is well suited to have a successful TDM Plan based on its location near retail and commercial development and its access to bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Post occupancy, it is recommended that the development submit an annual TDM Performance Report to the City that identifies the TDM measures implemented during the year and the trip reduction, compared to standard ITE rates (see Table 4). Land Use Unit Rate Trips Rate In% Out% In Out Total Rate In% Out%In Out Total Proposed Uses Multi-Family Housing1 94 DU 7.4 693 0.53 20% 80% 10 40 50 0.74 65% 35% 45 24 69 Retail 2 3.6 s.f. 42.7 155 0.96 62% 38% 2 2 4 3.71 48% 52% 6 7 13 20% Trip Reduction 3 -170 (2) (8) (11) (10) (6) (17) Primary Project Trips 679 9 3343 412565 Notes: 1. Based on Fitted Curved Equation for Apartments (220) land use, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition. 2. Based on average trip generation rates for Shopping Center (820) lane use, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition. 3 Accounts for the diversity of land uses, density, and distance to transit (consistent w ith DSASP EIR). AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Size Daily 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 14 Proposed TDM Measures The TDM measures to be implemented by the project include planning and design measures related to the attributes of the site location, the site design, and on-site amenities. Such measures encourage walking, biking, and use of transit. For the proposed project, these include the following: Site Location and Design-Related Measures The site is located within walking distance of the current South San Francisco Caltrain station. With the South San Francisco Caltrain station reconstruction, the proposed Caltrain plaza will be located to the immediate north of the project along Grand Avenue and the Caltrain station will be less than a 5-minute walk from the project. Passengers would be able to access the station via a tunnel that will be provided at the east end of downtown’s Grand Avenue. The site will be designed with upgraded sidewalks along Airport Boulevard to encourage walking to the Caltrain station. The site is also located within one quarter mile of several SamTrans bus routes. Ample bicycle support facilities will be provided including secure and protected bicycle parking for residents, bike racks for visitors, and on-site bicycle repair stations to encourage bicycling as a travel mode. TDM Administration and Promotion Designated Transportation Coordinator Experience with other TDM programs indicates that having a Transportation Coordinator who focuses on transportation issues and who is responsible for implementing and managing the TDM program is key to its success. The building owner or management will need to appoint an individual as the Transportation Coordinator or TDM contact person, and that person’s name and contact information will be provided to the City. The Transportation Coordinator’s responsibilities will include organizing and implementing the promotional programs, updating information on the online information board/kiosk, providing trip planning assistance and/or ride-matching assistance to residents who are considering an alternative mode for their commute, managing the annual driveway counts and resident survey. The Transportation Coordinator should maintain up-to-date transit schedules and route maps for SamTrans, BART, Caltrain and community shuttles and be knowledgeable enough to answer resident’s TDM program-related questions. Promotional Programs The Transportation Coordinator will need to undertake additional marketing activities to encourage residents and employees to try an alternative mode to get to work. Although some marketing, such as the online kiosk and distributing information welcome packets to new residents and new employees, will be conducted immediately, additional promotional activities might include email blasts of flyers, brochures or other materials on commute alternatives, ridesharing incentive programs, and transit benefits. SamTrans.com and 511.org can help provide some useful marketing materials. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 15 Table 3 Proposed TDM Measures for 200 Airport Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities The site has quality access to bicycle and pedestrian routes through South San Francisco, connecting the project to major destinations and transit stations. The presence of other commercial uses in the vicinity of the project site will encourage residents to walk to the retail, entertainment, and commercial areas nearby. It is expected that bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are included as part of the project will be successful in reducing vehicle trips. TDM Measure Responsibility Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Bike Parking Building Developer Bike Repair Hub Trans.Coordinator Resources (maps & info) Trans.Coordinator Carpool and Vanpool Programs 511 Ridematching Assistance Available to public Carpool/Vanpool Incentives for New Users Available to public Transit Elements $100 welcome transit pass (One-time) Trans.Coordinator Online Info Center "Online Kiosk": website with info Building Developer 1 Info Packets for New Residents and New Employees Trans.Coordinator Program Marketing, Administration, Monitoring and Reporting Transportation Coordinator Building Developer 1 Event promotions & publications Trans. Coordinator Annual count of vehicles entering and leaving site Independent party Annual Employee /Resident Survey Trans. Coordinator Annual reporting to City Trans. Coordinator Internet and Telecommuting Cable wiring to facilitate telecommuting Building Developer On-Site Amenities Residential fitness center Building Developer Cyber Lounge Building Developer Parking Unbundled Parking Trans. Coordinator Notes: 1.The building developer will have initial responsibility for creating an online kiosk and appointing the Transportation Coordinator. After the building is occupied, the Transportation Coordinator will have ongoing responsibility for the online kiosk and various program elements. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 16 Bicycle Parking Providing secure bicycle parking encourages bicycle commuting and reduces daily vehicle trips. The zoning ordinance requires short-term bicycle parking spaces at a rate of 10 percent of the number of required automobile parking spaces and a minimum of one long term bicycle parking space per every four units for multi-unit residential and group residential projects. The proposed project requires 12 short-term bicycle parking spaces and 24 long- term bicycle parking spaces. The site plan shows that short-term bicycle parking will be provided along the project frontage on Airport Boulevard; a bicycle rack that can accommodate 6 bicycles will be provided near Baden Avenue and another bicycle rack that can accommodate 6 bicycles will be located near Grand Avenue. The site plan also shows a bicycle storage room that can accommodate 34 bicycles on the first-floor parking level. Adequate short-term and long-term bicycle parking wll be provided on site. Bicycle Resources As part of the information available in the “online kiosk” discussed in more detail below, resources useful to cyclists will be included. For example, the local bikeways map will be posted for easy reference. A map showing the safe routes to the public elementary school, middle school, and high school that will serve the site’s families will also be posted. The following resources are available to bicycle commuters through 511.org. These resources will be noted on the project’s online information center to make tenants aware of them.  Free Bike Buddy matching  Bicycle maps  Bicycle safety tips  Information about taking bikes on public transit  Location and use of bike parking at transit stations  Information on Bike to Work Day  Tips on selecting a bike and commute gear  Links to bicycle organizations Bicycle Repair Stands In Bike Storage Rooms The project is proposing to provide bike repair stands/kiosks in the bicycle storage room. The bicycle repair stands will include all the tools necessary to perform basic bike repairs and maintenance, from changing a flat tire to adjusting brakes and derailleurs. Repair stations also provide a singular point where bicyclists can share information on routes, commuting, and maintenance practices to help generate a stronger community that is more engaged in bicycling as a mode of transportation. Pedestrian Accessibility The site is currently well-served by pedestrian amenities including sidewalks and crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads. Improvements to these existing facilities, including the widening of sidewalks and the addition of planting strips along the project frontage to provide buffer between vehicles and 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 17 pedestrians by the development will encourage individuals to walk to nearby destinations. The proposed public pedestrian and bicycle ways are shown on Figure 2. Carpool and Vanpool Programs 511 Ride Matching Assistance The 511 RideMatch service provides an interactive, on-demand system that helps commuters find carpools, vanpools or bicycle partners. This program will be promoted through the online information center and in New Resident Information packets. This free car and vanpool ride-matching service helps commuters find others with similar routes and travel patterns with whom they may share a ride. Registered users are provided with a list of other commuters near their employment or residential Zip code along with the closest cross street, email, phone number, and hours they are available to commute to and from work. Participants are then able to select and contact others with whom they wish to commute. The service also provides a list of existing carpools and vanpools in their residential area that may have vacancies. Ride-matching assistance is also available through a number of peer-to-peer matching programs, such as Zimride and TwoGo, which utilize social networks to match commuters. Carpool/Vanpool Incentives for New Users The 511 Regional Rideshare Program offers a number of incentive programs to encourage people to try carpooling and vanpooling. Most of these programs are designed to reward someone for forming or trying a carpool or vanpool and provide an award or subsidy after the first three or six months of use.  Vanpool Formation Incentive: The 511 Regional Rideshare Program provides up to $500 in gas cards to new vanpools that meet certain eligibility requirements and complete three to six consecutive months of operation. The gas cards are awarded on a first-come, first-served basis, until funds are exhausted.  Vanpool Seat Subsidy: The 511 Regional Rideshare Program also offers a vanpool seat subsidy in the form of gas cards. The seat subsidy will provide $100 per month, with a limit of three months per van during the program year, to help cover the fare of a lost participant. The gas cards will be offered to eligible vans on a first-come, first-served basis until the funds are exhausted.  Discounted Tolls: The 511 Regional Rideshare Program offers free toll passage on seven of the Bay Area’s bridges for vanpools with 11-15 people who register with 511. Additionally, the program also offers toll discounts to carpools with three or more people (two people in a two- seat vehicle) on eight of the Bay Area’s bridges during peak commute hours. The discounts vary per bridge, but typically are half of the standard toll price. For example, the San Mateo – Hayward Bridge has a standard toll of $5, but for a carpool of three people (two people in a two- seat vehicle) the toll is only $2.50 Monday through Friday between 5-10 AM and 3-7 PM. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 18 Ridematching with Scoop Scoop is a carpool matching application that helps commuters to connect with carpoolers who share a similar commute in trip planning. Scoop’s algorithm matches commuters based on route, predicted traffic, and past feedback. AM and PM trips can be scheduled separately. Morning trips should be scheduled by 9 p.m. the night before and afternoon and evening trips should be scheduled by 3.30 PM the day of the trip. Trips can be scheduled up to a week in advance. Scoop lets commuters know their carpool details well in advance so there’s zero stress. Scoop is providing guaranteed rides back home in the evening for the commuters who commuted using the scoop app in the morning and are not able to find a ridematch in the evening. Transit Elements Subsidized Transit Passes The developer will provide $100 one-time welcome transit pass to all new residents for the first one year following building occupancy. This will encourage residents to explore transit options in the project vicinity and motivate residents to use transit for commuting to work. The Transportation Coordinator will be responsible for administering the program. Each resident will be given a clipper card that can be used on various transit systems like BART, Caltrans and SamTrans. Clipper is the all-in-one transit card for the Bay Area and can be used on all Bay Area transit systems, including Muni. The Clipper card can also be used as an access key to Bikeshare by linking the card to Ford GoBike account. Alternatively, discount transit passes could be offered through the SamTrans Way2Go program, which allows residential complexes to purchase annual unlimited-ride passes for all eligible employees or residents. Marketing Program for Alternative Travel Modes “Online Kiosk”: An Online Information Center Most TDM plans have traditionally included a requirement for a kiosk or bulletin board to be created for posting information related to alternative travel modes. Experience often shows, however, that few residents or employees look at these kiosks after an initial period of interest. This TDM Plan proposes to establish an “online kiosk” with similar information that a resident could access from their home, their workplace, or anywhere else. A key element of this TDM plan is to set up an attractive, up-to-date “online kiosk” with all of the site- specific information about the transportation resources available to residents. The website will include information about all the measures, services, and facilities discussed in this plan, including:  A summary of SamTrans buses, BART and Caltrain services and links to further information about their routes and schedules.  A summary of the “welcome” trial transit passes offered to all residents.  A local bikeways map, information about the bike lockers/secure bike storage areas on site and those nearby, and information about the Bikeshare program. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 19  Information about ridematching services (e.g., 511.org, Zimride, Scoop and TwoGo) and the incentive programs available to carpools and vanpools.  Information related to a carshare program, including benefits and nearby locations.  A link to the many other resources available in the Bay Area, such as Dadnab, the 511 Carpool Calculator, the 511 Transit Trip Planner, real-time traffic conditions, etc. The building developer will have responsibility for contracting with someone to initially create the website so that it is up and running as soon as residents move in. More specific information can be added later to reflect any programs specific to certain groups of residents. The Transportation Coordinator will be responsible for adding new information to the website (or providing it to the website designer) and including the web address for the online kiosk so that the “online kiosk” remains current and informative. Information Packet for Residents In addition to the online information center, the Transportation Coordinator will provide “hard copy” information packets to all residents when they first move into the building. Because all information will be available online, this packet need not be a comprehensive stack of paper about all services available, which residents tend to disregard anyway. Instead, the New Resident Packet will provide a quick easy-to-read announcement of the most important features of the TDM program for residents to know about immediately. In addition, the packets will include a message to residents that their building manager and/or owner values alternative modes of transportation and takes their commitment to supporting alternative transportation options seriously. Building Features to Facilitate Telecommuting In an effort to decrease the number of trips residents have to make to and from work each week, the developer proposes to install cable wiring throughout the residential development to provide residents access to high speed internet service, allowing them to work from home. This TDM measure is meant to encourage telecommuting, whereby residents of the development who typically report to a central office location, will be able to work at home one or more days per week. On-site Amenities On-site amenities can be beneficial in reducing vehicle trips by offering activities and common retail needs on site. The project will provide a fitness center and Wi-Fi lounge on site that will be open to all residents. Having a free fitness center on site will encourage residents to use the available facilities rather than travel to a fitness center elsewhere. Fitness centers can often encourage alternative modes of transportation by educating users of the additional benefits that can be obtained by using active modes of transportation for other trips. The project site is also surrounded by retail uses. This will provide more opportunities to meet the necessities of residents without having to travel far from the project site, and possibly without using a car. Unbundled Residential Parking Residential parking should be unbundled from each living unit upon project completion. According to Section 20.280.006 Supplemental Regulations – downtown of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, for apartment developments, 50 percent of the required parking may be unbundled. Unbundled 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 20 parking means separating the cost of parking from residential leases and allowing residents to choose whether or not to lease a parking space. With this approach those tenants without a vehicle would not be required to pay for parking that they do not want or need. This is the most equitable approach and would free up parking for those tenants that require a space and are willing to pay for it. Unbundling residential parking costs from the cost of housing can reduce tenant vehicle ownership and parking demand and can be implemented on a month-to-month lease basis. With a lease, residents receive a monthly bill showing how much they are spending on a parking space and have the option to give up the space if they no longer need it. Estimated Trip Reductions The project is located in the Downtown Specific Area Plan. The project location by itself provides location efficiency in promoting transit, bicycling, and walking and reducing SOV trips and parking demand generated by the project. The project is 1/4 mile to the South San Francisco Caltrain Station and within 3 miles of the South San Francisco BART Station and the San Bruno BART Station. There are several SamTrans bus services with stops that are located within a quarter mile. Caltrain, BART, and SamTrans provide frequent and reliable transit services to a high percentage of regional destinations. The project is located within the downtown district, and it is a short walk or bicycle ride from the retail, office, and residential land uses in downtown and the surrounding area. The project location effectively renders it part of a large-scale mixed-use development in a pedestrian-friendly environment with a significant share of internal trips. Based on the trip surveys for urban infill, mixed-use, and transit-oriented developments published in the Caltrans' Trip-Generation Rates for Urban Infill Land Uses in California (June 2009), the observed trip rates for mid-rise apartments in Berkeley, Santa Monica, and Pasadena were 27 – 28 percent lower than the ITE trip rates and for retail stores Berkley, San Diego, and San Francisco were 26 – 35 percent lower than the ITE trip rates. As a conservative approach, Hexagon estimates that approximately 20 percent of the project’s residential vehicle trips and 28 percent of the project’s retail vehicle trips would be reduced by using alternative modes of transportation. Based on the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (2010), it is estimated that unbundling parking from residential leases/purchases would reduce the site’s trip generation by 3 to 13 percent. As a conservative approach, Hexagon estimates that approximately 3 percent of the project’s residential vehicle trips would be reduced with unbundled parking. Based on the project location and the proposed TDM measures, it is estimated that the project could achieve a 23 percent trip reduction for the residential portion and a 28 percent trip reduction for the retail portion of the project (see Table 4). The entire project could achieve a 24 percent trip reduction during weekday peak hours. 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 21 Table 4 Estimated Trip Reductions Program Monitoring and Reporting Applicants shall submit a final TDM Plan to the City and shall be responsible for ensuring that the trip reduction measures are successfully implemented and remain in substantial compliance with the Downtown Specific Area Plan. The trip reduction measures included in this TDM Plan will be incorporated into the project. It is anticipated that, after the project is constructed, an individual from the owner or property management team within the project will be designated as the Transportation Coordinator and assume responsibility for the ongoing TDM measures. When any ownership, management, or contact information changes, the City will be notified of the name, phone number, and email address of the designated Transportation Coordinator. Monitoring will help ensure that the implemented TDM measures are effective in reducing peak trips by 24% from ITE rates. In order to monitor progress towards this goal, vehicle counts will be conducted in order to compare the actual peak hour vehicle trips to the number of peak hour trips estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ rates for these land uses (see Table 2). Consistent with common traffic engineering data collection principles, trip generation will be monitored by means of driveway counts at the project’s garage access points. The counts will be conducted one day per year on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) during the fall when schools are in session. The project trips during the AM and PM peak hours of commute traffic will be extracted from the daily driveway count. In addition, an annual survey will be administered to all residents. The survey will provide information on what modes residents are using to travel to work, and what TDM programs they have found most useful. The site TDM coordinator will work with an independent consultant to obtain traffic count data and to document the results in a TDM monitoring report. The annual monitoring report will be submitted to the City by the TDM coordinator. The data will be reviewed by the City to assess whether the goal of a 24% trip reduction is being met. This will be assessed by comparing the driveway counts to the trip targets set forth in Table 4 of this TDM plan report. If the City determines that the trip reduction goal is not being achieved or the on-site parking garage reaches full capacity, additional TDM measures would Land Use Residentials Trips 693 50 69 Project Location 20% -139 -10 -14 Unbundled Parking 3% -21 -2 -2 Residential Trips after Reductions 533 38 53 Retail Trips 155 4 13 Project Location 28% -43 -1 -4 Retail Trips after Reductions 112 3 9 Total Project Trips after Reductions 645 41 62 Percent Trip Reduction Achieved 24% 24% 24% TDM Measure Trip Reduction % Daily Trips AM Pk-Hr Trips PM Pk-Hr Trips 200 Airport Boulevard – Transportation Demand Management Plan April 12, 2019 Page | 22 need to be implemented. The annual TDM monitoring report will describe any planned modifications to the TDM plan intended to ensure compliance with the trip reduction targets established for this project. Conclusions The TDM measures to be implemented by the project complement the attributes of the site location, the site design, and on-site amenities. Such measures encourage walking, biking, and use of transit. The project would be able to meet the parking demand generated by the tenants/residents. CITY COUNCIL 2019 KAR YL MATSUMOTO, MAYOR RICHARD A. GARBARINO, VICE MAYOR MARK ADDIEGO, COUNCILMEMBER MARK NAGALES, COUNCILMEMBER BUENAFLOR NICOLAS, COUNCILMEMBER MIKE FUTRELL, CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (650) 829-6620 FAX (650) 829-6657 E-MAIL WEB-ECD@SSF.NET DESIGN REVIEW BOARD COMMENT LETTER Date: Applicant: Issued January 30, 2019 for January 15, 2019 DRB Meeting FF Realty ill LLC 5510 Morehouse Drive, Ste 200 San Diego, CA 92121 Site Address: 200 Airport Blvd Project No.: PlS-0071: UP lS-0014, DR lS-0036, TDMlS-0010 & PM lS-0002 On Tuesday, January 15, 2019, the Design Review Board reviewed your plans for Use Permit, Parking Reduct ion, Design Review, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map to construct a new 7-story mixed-use building with a total of 94 residential units and approximately 3,630 square feet of retail at 200 Airport Boulevard in the Downtown Transit Core (DTC) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, and determination that the environmental effects of the proposed project were sufficiently analyzed under the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) Program Environmental Impact Report (BIR), per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Manager and Design Review Board have determined that this application is in compliance and pursuant to Title 20, Section 20.480 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and Design Guidelines after the following changes have been made to the plans: 1.The Board liked the design concept. 2.For the two-story base around the west and south elevations, the portions of the board form concrete may look too industrial for the site. Consider breaking it up and utilizing additional accent materials (similar to the adjacent 150 Airport Blvd project). 3.For the outdoor amenity spaces and courtyard area, a wind study should be conducted to help mitigate wind-related issues on outdoor communal spaces. The area is subject to substantial wind and all outdoor areas should be constructed with appropriate wind mitigation such as glass wall panels, windscreens, etc. a.If wind elements cannot be mitigated, consider relocating the courtyard to the South, Southeast, or East to gain more usable outdoor spaces. b.The roof terrace may also have exposure to the wind, as the proposed glass wall will not provide the proper protection from the wind. Consider heightening the glass wall to the top of the floor to mitigate any incoming winds.         CARLSBAD FRESNO IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO 157 Park Place, Pt. Richmond, California  94801     510.236.6810     www.lsa.net    MEMORANDUM  DATE: April 25, 2019  TO: Trevor Boucher, Fairfield Residential  FROM: Theresa Wallace, AICP, Principal  Matthew Wiswell, Project Manager  SUBJECT: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) DSASP FEIR Environmental Consistency  Analysis for the 200 Airport Boulevard Project, South San Francisco, California    INTRODUCTION  This memorandum and attachments provide a description of the 200 Airport Boulevard Project  (proposed project) and substantial evidence to confirm that the proposed project is exempt from  further environmental analysis per Section 15168(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act  (CEQA). The approximately 0.55‐acre project site is located at 200‐214 Airport Boulevard in South  San Francisco, San Mateo County, at the corner of Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue. The  proposed project would include the demolition of five one‐ to two‐story structures and associated  pavements on the site in order to grade and construct a new seven‐story mixed‐use building for 94  residential units,3,630 square feet of commercial retail space, and 110 parking spaces in a two‐story  parking garage. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to occur over approximately 25  months, starting in March 2020 and ending in April 2022.  Attachment A provides a description of the proposed project. This attachment includes a description  of the location, existing site characteristics, the proposed project, and required approvals and  entitlements. The City of South San Francisco is the CEQA lead agency for the project.  The responses in the environmental checklist (Attachment B) prepared for the project demonstrate,  for each CEQA topic, that because the proposed project was evaluated and impacts were mitigated  to the maximum degree possible by the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) and its Final  Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), no additional CEQA review is required. CEQA Guidelines  Section 15168(c)(4) recommends using a written checklist or similar device to confirm whether the  environmental effects of a subsequent activity were adequately covered in a program EIR. The  responses contained in the checklist confirm that the project was considered within the scope of the  evaluation within the DSASP FEIR and no new impacts were identified and no new mitigation  measures are required.    4/25/19 (\\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\200 Airport Blvd Memo.docx)  2  SUMMARY  The following recommendations and conditions of approval outlined in Attachment B would ensure  the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those that were  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR:   Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 1: In compliance with the requirements of DSASP  Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1, the project contractor shall ensure all off‐road diesel‐powered  construction equipment used for the project meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB)  Tier 2 emissions standards and are retrofitted with a level 3 diesel particulate filter or  equivalent.   Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2: In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measures  MM4.2‐3, the following measures shall be required to reduce health risks to a level sufficient to  achieve compliance with BAAQMD thresholds:  ○ The project applicant shall provide a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)  system with a control efficiency sufficient to result in a reduction of a minimum 75.0 percent  of particulates of 2.5 microns or less, such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV)‐ 12 filters or greater, for indoor air filtration systems. The ventilation system shall be certified  to achieve the stated performance effectiveness from indoor areas.  ○ All air intakes shall be located as far away from US 101 as feasible.  ○ The project applicant shall ensure the proper indications on the specifications for  maintaining the installed air filtration system are provided to future residents of the project  site.   Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3: In compliance with the requirements of DSASP  Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐3, the project applicant shall implement the following measures, or  similar combination of measures, which demonstrate that interior noise levels would be  reduced to an acceptable level of 45 dBA CNEL or lower:   ○ In order for windows and doors to remain closed, mechanical ventilation such as air  conditioning shall be provided for all units.  ○ All vent ducts connecting interior spaces to the exterior (i.e., bathroom exhaust, etc.) shall  have at least two 90 degree turns in the duct.  ○ All windows and doors shall be installed in an acoustically‐effective manner. Sliding‐window  panels shall form an air‐tight seal when in the closed position and the window frames shall  be caulked to the wall opening around the perimeter with a non‐hardening caulking  compound to prevent sound infiltration. Exterior doors shall seal air‐tight around the full  perimeter when in the closed position.    4/25/19 (\\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\200 Airport Blvd Memo.docx)  3  ○ A Final Acoustical Report shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit to  determine all the minimum STC ratings for the walls, windows, and doors to be provided to  the City for review. This report shall be completed by a qualified acoustical consultant to  ensure that the selected windows and doors in combination with wall assemblies would  reduce interior noise levels sufficiently to meet the City’s interior noise standard for  residential uses.   Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4: In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐ 5, at the time of building permit submittal, the project applicant shall submit a site specific  vibration analysis to confirm what, if any, vibration design mitigation measures have been  implemented into the building design to ensure vibration levels are reduced to less than 72 VdB.  The report shall be submitted to the City for review as part of the building permit submittal  package. If necessary, methods to reduce vibration may include, but are not limited to, the use  of elastomer pads to support the building foundation, deeper joists, shorter floor spans, and/or  lally columns. Proposed building structures should be designed to minimize vibration  amplification at the upper floors.   Project‐Specific Recommendation 1: The proposed project should designate a loading area for  moving/delivery trucks and ridesharing vehicles to pick‐up and drop‐off residents.   Project‐Specific Recommendation 2: The proposed project should include a Travel Demand  Management (TDM) program to implement strategies to encourage residents to use transit and  off‐set the potential parking deficit.   Project‐Specific Recommendation 3: The proposed project shall provide 12 short‐term bicycle  parking spaces on site as required by the zoning ordinance.  CONCLUSION  The City can approve the proposed project as being within the scope of the DSASP covered by its  FEIR and no new environmental document for the purposes of CEQA clearance is required. Pursuant  to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, the proposed project is  exempt from further review under CEQA. This analysis finds that a Notice of Exemption may be  prepared for the project and filed with the San Mateo County Clerk.    4/25/19 (\\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\200 Airport Blvd Memo.docx)  4  This page intentionally left blank         ATTACHMENT A    PROJECT DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐1 ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION    The following describes the 200 Airport Boulevard Project (proposed project) that is the subject of  this Environmental Consistency Analysis (ECA) prepared per the California Environmental Quality Act  (CEQA). The proposed project would result in the construction of a new seven‐story mixed‐use  residential building and associated improvements in the City of South San Francisco (City). This  chapter includes a description of the location of the project site, the existing site conditions, the  project background, the proposed improvements, and required approvals and permits.  PROJECT SITE  The following section describes the project location, existing conditions, surrounding land uses, and  the regulatory setting.  Project Location  The approximately 0.55‐acre project site is located at 200‐214 Airport Boulevard in South San  Francisco, San Mateo County. The project site is bounded by a future Caltrain Plaza and Grand  Avenue to the north, a Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right‐of‐way and U.S. Highway 101 (US 101) to  the east, residential uses that are currently under construction to the south, and Airport Boulevard  to the west. The project site includes five parcels with the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers  (APNs): 012‐338‐010, 012‐338‐020, 012‐338‐030, 012‐338‐040, and 012‐338‐050. Figure 1 shows the  project site’s regional and local context. Figure 2 depicts an aerial photograph of the project site and  surrounding land uses.  Regional vehicular access to the project site is provided by US 101, located adjacent to the project  site to the east. The closest on‐ and off‐ramps for US 101 are located just north of the intersection of  Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue. The existing South San Francisco Caltrain Station, which  provides hourly service between San Francisco and Gilroy, is located approximately 0.2 miles  northeast of the project site. The future South San Francisco Caltrain Station, which is expected to  open in 2021, will be approximately 0.1 miles northeast of the project site, with a new City plaza and  pedestrian underpass directly adjacent to the site.  Existing Conditions  The generally level project site is located in the southern portion of the South San Francisco  Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP)1 Planning Area (Plan Area). The majority of the site is  currently covered with impervious surfaces, consisting of buildings and paved parking lots,  driveways, and walkways.   1   South San Francisco, City of, 2015. South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. February.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT   SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐2 This page intentionally left blank    0 1000 2000 Project Site CO C CO ALAMEDA COUNTY Project Location SOURCE: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC (C) 2018; ESRI WORLD STREET MAP (C) 2018. Y͗Ͱ&&ϭϴϬϭϮϬϬŝƌƉŽƌƚůǀĚͰ'ƌĂƉŚŝĐƐͰ&ŝŐƵƌĞƐͰ&ŝŐƵƌĞϭͺWƌŽũĞĐƚ>ŽĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚZĞŐŝŽŶĂůsŝĐŝŶŝƚLJDĂƉ͘ŵdžĚ;ϭϭͬϱͬϭϴͿ FIGURE 1 200 Airport Boulevard Project WƌŽũĞĐƚ>ŽĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚZĞŐŝŽŶĂůsŝĐŝŶŝƚLJDĂƉ GG r a nd Ave Gateway BlvdBayshore Fw yLinden AveLinden AveLinden AveLinden AveAirport BlvdS Linden AveS Linden AveBaden A v e Baden Ave Miller A v e Miller Ave Cypress AveCypress AveInduusstriall WayDubuque AveGrand A v e Grand Ave S Spruce AveS Spruce Ave S A i r p o r t B l v d Sp ru ce A v e Railroa d Ave Railroad Ave 1st La n e 1st Lane Comme r c ial Ave Commercial Ave 3rd Lan e 3rd Lane Maple AveMaple AveTamara c k L n Tamarack Ln Lux Av e Lux Ave Califor n i a A v e California Ave N Canal S t N Canal St S Canal St S Canal St SOUTH S O U T H SAN FRANCISCOSAN F R A N C I S C OPine A v e Pine Ave Aspen A v e Aspen Ave Ar m ou r A ve Arm our Ave G r a nd Ave Gateway BlvdBayshore Fw yLinden AveLinden AveAirport BlvdS Linden AveBaden A v e Miller A v e Lux Av e 3rd Lan e Tamara c k L n Califor n i a A v e Cypress AveIndustrial WayDubuque AveGrand A v e S Spruce Ave S A i r p o r t B l v d Sp ru ce A v e Railroa d Ave N Canal S t S Canal St 1st La n e Comme r c ial AveMaple AveSOUTH SAN FRANCISCOPine A v e Aspen A v e Ar m ou r A ve 101 US South San Francisco Caltrain StaƟon LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/ COMMERCIAL Proposed Caltrain Plaƞorm Extension and Undercrossing RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL 10000 500 FEET Project Site Downtown StaƟon Area Specific Plan Boundary SOURCES: GOOGLE EARTH, 5/10/18; LSA, 2018. Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 2_Aerial Photograph of Project Site.ai (11/5/18) FIGURE 2 200 Airport Boulevard Project Aerial Photograph of Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐5 Five existing one‐ to two‐story commercial buildings totaling approximately 15,100 square feet in  size are located on the project site. All five structures are accessible via Airport Boulevard.  Additionally, the building at 214 Airport Boulevard is accessible via Grand Avenue. A total of  approximately 17 associated surface parking spaces are located on the site. Figure 3 shows the  existing conditions on the project site. Table A provides a summary of the existing buildings on the  project site.  Table A: 200‐214 Airport Boulevard Existing Building Summary  Address Assessor’s Parcel  Number Current Use  Size (square feet)  Height  200 Airport Boulevarda 012‐338‐050  Vacant/Unmarked  1,103; 5,649  One‐story  206 Airport Boulevard  012‐338‐040  Commercial  4,875  One‐story  210 Airport Boulevard  012‐338‐030  Commercial  2,362  Two‐story  214 Airport Boulevard  012‐338‐010  Vacant  1,111  One‐story  Source: BKF Engineers (September 2018).  a    There are two buildings located at 200 Airport Boulevard.    Ruderal vegetation, including ornamental trees and grasses, are scattered throughout the project  site. Approximately seven trees are located within, or immediately adjacent to, the project site.   Surrounding Land Uses  As shown in Figure 2, a variety of land uses surround the project site. Bordering the project site to  the north will be a the new City plaza and pedestrian underpass that is currently under construction,  and once complete will connect to the South San Francisco Caltrain Station. Further north of the  project site is US 101 and a mix of commercial, light industrial, and residential uses. Immediately  east of the project site is the Caltrain underpass, the UPRR right‐of‐way, and US 101. Further east,  land uses include industrial, commercial, and research and development (R&D). Bordering the  project site to the south is the 150 Airport Boulevard project, which is a 157‐unit residential building  that is currently under construction, with an estimated completion date of the fourth quarter of  2020. Further south of the project site is the UPRR right‐of‐way, light industrial, and commercial  uses. Bordering the project site to the west is Airport Boulevard, across which is the recently  completed 211 Airport Boulevard development, which includes 69 residential units. Land uses are  mixed further west of the project site, but are predominantly residential and commercial.  FEET80040Project SiteFIGURE 3SOURCE: BKF, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 3_ExisƟng Site CondiƟons.ai (11/5/18)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectExisƟng Site CondiƟons ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐7 Regulatory Setting  All five parcels within the project site are designated Downtown Transit Core (DTC) in the South San  Francisco DSASP.2 The DTC allows up to 180 units per acre with the inclusion of community  incentives and public benefits.3 The DTC is envisioned to be a vibrant, mixed‐use area suitable for  the highest intensities of new development in the Downtown area. Figure 4 shows the existing  DSASP land use diagram and the location of the project site within the DSASP Plan Area.  DOWNTOWN STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN  In 2015, the City of South San Francisco adopted the DSASP as a guide for future development in the  portion of the City of South San Francisco that lies within a ½‐mile radius of the Caltrain Station. The  DSASP provides the blueprint for future change and improvements in the Downtown and adjoining  areas. The DSASP Environmental Impact Report (EIR)4 was certified in January 2015 and evaluates  the environmental impact of 1,435 units of residential development, the addition of 511,780 square  feet of commercial business space, the addition of 21,250 square feet of industrial space, the  creation of 268,800 square feet of commercial retail space, and the creation of 1,185,049 square  feet of office and R&D space.  The DSASP includes two main areas: Downtown and the Eastern Neighborhood. The project site is  situated in the Downtown area, which includes the entire DSASP Plan Area west of US 101. The  DSASP identifies four sub‐areas within the Downtown area that are intended to be the focus of  change for the future. Each sub‐area has its own policies related to land uses and density. The  project site is located within the Downtown Transit Core sub‐area.  PROPOSED PROJECT  This section provides a description of the proposed project as identified in the materials provided by  the project applicant that are dated December 3, 2018.5 The proposed project would involve the  demolition of all existing structures and associated pavements on the project site and the  construction of a seven‐story mixed‐use residential building that would include 94 residential units  and 3,630 square feet of commercial retail space. Figure 5 shows a conceptual site plan for the  proposed project. The proposed project components are described in detail below.  The DSASP EIR evaluated the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the entire  DSASP, of which the proposed project is a part of. Table B shows the housing units and commercial  space assumptions evaluated within the DSASP FEIR, the number of approved units and commercial  space, and the remaining development available. As shown, the development associated with the  proposed project is within the amount of growth evaluated within the DSASP FEIR.  2   Ibid.  3   South San Francisco, City of, 2018. Ordinance 1553‐2018. March 28.  4   South San Francisco, City of, 2015. South San Francisco Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Final  Environmental Impact Report. January 28.  5   It should be noted that the analysis throughout this document was based on the development of 98  residential units on the project site. The proposed project has since been revised to include 4 fewer units  (94 units are proposed). Therefore, the analysis of project impacts is conservative and is slightly  overestimated.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT   SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐8 This page intentionally left blank      PROJECTSITEFEET10000500PROJECT SITELEGENDFIGURE 4SOURCE: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, FEBRUARY 2015.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 4_ExisƟng Downtown StaƟon Area SP LU.ai (1/31/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectExisƟng Downtown StaƟon Area Specific Plan Land Use FEET60030Project SiteFIGURE 5SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 5_Conceptual Site Plan.ai (1/31/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Site Plan ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐11 Table B: Existing and Proposed Housing Units and Commercial Space   within the Plan DSASP Area   Evaluated within the  DSASP FEIR Approved  Remaining  Development  Available  Proposed Project  Housing Units  1,435  960  475  94  Commercial Space  (square feet)  268,800  14,150  254,650  3,630  Source: City of South San Francisco Development and Construction Map (January 7, 2019).    Building Program  The proposed project would result in the construction of 94 residential apartment units in five  stories above a two‐story parking garage with ground level commercial space, at a density of  171 dwelling units per acre. The unit mix includes 26 studio units averaging approximately  573 square feet in size, 39 one‐bedroom units averaging 789 square feet in size, and 29 two‐ bedroom units averaging approximately 1,084 square feet in size. The ground level would include  approximately 3,630 square feet of commercial retail space that would be located in the northern  portion of the proposed building and front to both Airport Boulevard and the Caltrain pedestrian  plaza, and a 967 square‐foot residential lobby in the southwest corner of the proposed building.  Figures 6 through 10 show conceptual floor plans for the proposed building.The proposed project  would consist of a single continuous building with residential units generally situated along the  edges of the project site with an interior podium courtyard on the third story and a roof deck on the  seventh. The proposed building would be seven stories (83 feet) in height. Conceptual building  elevations are shown in Figure 11.  Open Space and Landscaping  The proposed project would include a total of 8,125 square feet of common open space. This would  include approximately 4,832 square feet of private balconies for individual units, a 2,047‐square‐ foot courtyard on the third story, and a 1,246‐square‐foot roof deck on the seventh story. Amenities  on the third floor courtyard would include outdoor seating, barbeques, group dining tables, a game  area, and raised metal planters. Amenities on the seventh floor roof deck would include private and  common seating areas, dining tables, a barbeque area, and fireplace. A total of 15 new trees and  various shrubs and ground covers would be planted as a part of the proposed project. A conceptual  landscaping plan is shown in Figure 12.  FEET32016FIGURE 6SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 6_Conceptual Level 1 Floor Plan.ai (1/31/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Level 1 Floor Plan FEET32016FIGURE 7SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 7_Conceptual Level 2 Floor Plan.ai (11/5/18)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Level 2 Floor Plan FEET32016FIGURE 8SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 8_Conceptual Level 3 Floor Plan.ai (2/26/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Level 3 Floor Plan CORRIDORFEET32016FIGURE 9SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 9_Conceptual Level 4-6 Floor Plan.ai (2/26/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Level 4-6 Floor Plan CORRIDORFEET32016FIGURE 10SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 10_Conceptual Level 7 Floor Plan.ai (2/26/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Level 7 Floor Plan Conceptual North ElevaƟon - Grand AvenueConceptual West ElevaƟon - Airport BoulevardConceptual East ElevaƟon - Below US-101Conceptual South ElevaƟon - 150 Airport BoulevardNOT TO SCALEFIGURE 11SOURCE: CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 11_Conceptual Building ElevaƟons.ai (2/26/19)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Building ElevaƟons NOTE:All plans to comply with the City of South San FranciscoDowntown StaƟon Area Specific Plan and SecƟon20.300.007 of the Zoning OrdinanceFEET32016Project SiteFIGURE 12SOURCES: MJS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; CARRIERJOHNSON + CULTUR3, 2018.Q:\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\Graphics\Figures\Figure 12_Conceptual Landscape Plan.ai (11/5/18)200 Airport Boulevard ProjectConceptual Landscape Plan ATTACHMENT A  PROJECT DESCRIPTION  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐19 Access, Circulation, and Parking  Access to the project site would be provided by a shared driveway with the 150 Airport Boulevard  project along the southern boundary of the project site. This driveway would provide access to the  interior parking garage, which would consist of the first two levels of the proposed building. The  parking garage would provide a total of 110 parking spaces, including a total of 94 residential spaces  and 12 commercial spaces. The first level of the parking garage would include 52 residential spaces,  50 of which would be located within mechanical puzzle stackers, and all of the retail parking spaces.  The second floor of the parking garage would include 46 residential parking spaces. Long‐term  spaces for 36 bicycles would be provided within the first floor of the parking garage, and 12 short‐ term bicycle parking spaces would be provided along Airport Boulevard on the northwest and  southwest corners of the project site.  Pedestrian access to the residential portion of the project site would be provided on the ground  level through the residential lobby in the southwest corner, where residents of the proposed  building would access the residential floors through either an elevator or stairs located in the lobby.  An additional staircase providing access to the residential floors would also be located in the  northeast corner of the proposed building.  Utilities and Infrastructure  The project site is located in an urban area and is currently served by existing utilities, including:  water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, gas and electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure.  Existing and proposed utility connections are discussed below.  Water  Water service in the City of South San Francisco is provided by the California Water Service (Cal  Water). Existing connections to the existing water line within Airport Boulevard would be removed.  The proposed project would include new separate connections to the existing water line for fire  water (8‐inch), residential domestic water (4‐inch), irrigation water (2‐inch), and retail domestic  water (2‐inch).   Wastewater  The South San Francisco Water Quality Control Plant provides wastewater treatment for the City of  South San Francisco. The City of South San Francisco maintains existing sewer lines within the  vicinity of the project site. The proposed project would include a connection to the existing sanitary  sewer manhole located along Airport Boulevard.  Stormwater  Aside from a minor amount of grasses and shrubs, existing buildings, paving, concrete, and other  impervious surfaces account for the entire project site. Current drainage on the project site directs  runoff through the site to existing catch basins on the southern border of the project site. The  proposed storm drainage infrastructure would either self‐treat within landscaped areas on the third  floor courtyard or l drain through the project site to a bubbler catch basin that would connect to    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT   SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_3\A_200 Airport Blvd ProjDesc.docx (04/19/19) A‐20 existing stormwater infrastructure. On‐site drainage would be consistent with San Mateo County  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) C.3 requirements.  Electricity and Natural Gas  Electricity and natural gas services to the site are provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company  (PG&E). Existing underground utility connections and gas mains within Airport Boulevard provide  electricity and gas to the projects site. The proposed project would include the construction of a  new transformer located in the southeastern corner of the project site that would connect to  existing gas and electricity lines through a joint trench.  Demolition, Grading, and Construction  Development of the proposed project would result in the demolition of all existing structures and  pavements. The proposed project would include trenching for the electricity and gas tie‐ins to a  maximum depth of approximately 5 feet, and the rest of the site would be excavated to a depth of  approximately 3 to 5 feet. Approximately 408 net cubic yards would be excavated from the project  site to create a level pad. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to occur over  approximately 25 months, starting in March 2020 and ending in April 2022.  PROJECT APPROVALS  A number of permits and approvals would be required for the proposed project. While the City is  the CEQA Lead Agency for the project, other agencies also have discretionary authority related to  the project and approvals. A list of these agencies and potential permits and approvals that may be  required is provided in Table C.  Table C: Potential Permits and Approvals  Lead Agency  Potential Permits/Approvals  City of South San Francisco  Design Review Approval   Conditional Use Permit, including Parking Reduction   Community Benefits Package Approval   ECA Adoption   Transportation Demand Management Plan   Approval of water lines, water hookups, wastewater lines, wastewater hookups  Other Agencies  Pacific Gas and Electricity (PG&E)  Connection/Reconnection of utilities  California Water Service (CalWater)  Water meter connections  Source: LSA (2018).            ATTACHMENT B    ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15168  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐1  ATTACHMENT B  ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15168  CEQA Guidelines 15168(c)(4) recommends using a written checklist or similar device to confirm  whether the environmental effects of a subsequent activity were adequately covered in a program  EIR. This checklist confirms that the 200 Airport Boulevard Project (proposed project) described in  Attachment A is within the scope of, and is consistent with, the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan  Final EIR (DSASP FEIR) and will have no new or more severe significant effects and no new mitigation  measures are required.   In accordance with CEQA Section 21093(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(a), this  Environmental Consistency Analysis (ECA) tiers off the DSASP FEIR, certified in January 2015, which  is hereby incorporated by reference.   This checklist describes and evaluates potential changes to environmental impacts from the  proposed project as they relate to impacts identified in the DSASP FEIR. The focus of this analysis is  on impacts specific to the revised project and that differ from those identified in the DSASP FEIR.   This environmental checklist is used to: (1) compare the environmental impacts of the proposed  project with impacts expected to result from development approved in the DSASP and evaluated in  the DSASP FEIR; (2) to identify whether the proposed project would result in new or more severe  significant environmental impacts; and (3) to identity if substantial changes with respect to the  circumstances under which the project would be undertaken since the DSASP FEIR was certified  would result in new or more severe significant environmental effects.   Mitigation Measures are measures that would minimize, avoid, or eliminate a significant impact. The  analysis contained herein evaluated each topic to identify whether additional mitigation measures  beyond those identified in the DSASP FEIR would be warranted. As discussed for each topic in the  checklist, no new mitigation measures would be required for the proposed project.  For all other environmental topics addressed in the checklist as identified in each topical section,  there have been no substantial changes in environmental circumstances that would result in new or  more severe significant environmental effects than were evaluated and identified in the DSASP FEIR.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐2  This page intentionally left blank    ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐3  1. AESTHETICS    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:       a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?      b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not  limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings  within a state scenic highway       c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality  of the site and its surroundings?       d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which  would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?  ("Glare" is defined in the DSASP program EIR as the  reflection of harsh bright light sufficient to cause physical  discomfort or loss in visual performance and visibility.)         Discussion  Scenic Vistas  As noted in the DSASP FEIR, there are no scenic vistas or view corridors within the DSASP Plan Area,  but there are prominent visual landmarks in South San Francisco outside of the DSASP Plan Area  including San Bruno Mountain, Sign Hill Park, the “Wind Harp Tower” at San Bruno Point Hill and the  San Francisco Bay. There are no designated scenic outlooks within the DSASP Plan Area and no  designated vistas for San Bruno Mountain or Sign Hill Park. Therefore, views of scenic vistas from  and within the immediate vicinity of the project site would not be altered with development of the  proposed project. Additionally, the proposed project would be a maximum of 83 feet in height, and  therefore would be consistent with the DSASP DTC land use designation, which allows for buildings  to a maximum of 85 feet in height. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent  with the type and intensity of development assumed in the DSASP, there would be no new or more  significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to scenic vistas.  Scenic Resources  No State scenic highways are located within the DSASP Plan Area; however, there are historic  buildings that could be considered scenic resources. The integrity of historic resources would be  maintained with compliance with DSASP policies and objectives. A main objective of the DSASP is to  revitalize the Downtown to be a vibrant and successful community resource while protecting the  historic building fabric of the area. While Grand Avenue would experience new development and  improvements, the scale and character of the street would be maintained under the DSASP.  The DSASP policies, guidelines, and zoning regulations protect historic buildings and their visual  character. As noted in Section 5, Cultural Resources of this ECA, the Historical Resource Evaluation  (HRE), which is included as Appendix C, prepared for the project site determined the existing  structures do not appear to be eligible for listing as historic resources. Therefore, because the    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐4  proposed project would comply with all applicable DSASP policies, guidelines, and zoning  regulations, there would be no new or more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in  the DSASP FEIR related to scenic resources.  Visual Character  The existing DSASP Plan Area is currently comprised of inconsistent building heights and aesthetic  quality and lacks a cohesive grid street network. There is little to no streetscaping and the area is  deteriorated in certain locations and generally not designed for optimal pedestrian and commercial  activity. The DSASP includes design guidelines and standards to improve the overall aesthetic quality  of the DSASP Plan Area as a whole. Implementation of the proposed project would be beneficial to  the DSASP Plan Area, as it would include 94 new residential units within a high‐quality modern  building and construct significant pedestrian and streetscape enhancements along Airport  Boulevard. Therefore, because the proposed project would enhance the visual quality of the project  site and its surroundings consistent with the DSASP, there would be no new or more significant  impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to visual character.  Light and Glare  Redevelopment of the DSASP Plan Area would result in the introduction of new sources of light and  glare, such as security lighting or new glass panel buildings. As discussed in the DSASP FEIR, the  DSASP Plan Area is currently developed with similar land uses, and redevelopment would not result  in a substantial net increase in nighttime lighting or daytime glare sources. Additionally, the DSASP  requires that all new pedestrian light fixtures be designed to focus light onto sidewalks and that light  spillover into adjacent upper level building windows or into the night sky be minimized. Therefore,  because the proposed project would be required to comply with the performance standards in the  DSASP and existing lighting regulations in the South San Francisco Municipal Code, there would be  no new or more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to light  and glare.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 2‐I‐9: Ensure that any design and development standards and guidelines that are adopted  reflect the unique patterns and characteristics of individual neighborhoods.   Policy 3.1‐G‐1: Encourage development of Downtown as a pedestrian‐friendly mixed‐use activity  center with retail and visitor‐oriented uses, business and personal services, government and  professional offices, civic uses, and a variety of residential types and densities.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐5   Policy 3.1‐G‐4: Enhance linkages between Downtown and transit centers, and increased street  connectivity with the surrounding neighborhoods.   Policy 3.1‐I‐8: Improve pedestrian connections between the new multi‐modal transportation  center and Downtown through techniques such as sidewalk bulbing, lighting improvements, and  signage.  The proposed project would further the above listed policies by providing pedestrian‐friendly mixed‐ use development within the Downtown area, which would be consistent with design standards  adopted for the area, and would improve the connection between the new Caltrain station and  downtown by providing streetscape and pedestrian improvements along Airport Boulevard.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential aesthetic impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐6  2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES  In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead  agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)  prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing  impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including  timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled  by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of  forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment  Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by  the California Air Resources Board.    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:       a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of  Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps  prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and  Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to  non‐agricultural use?       b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a  Williamson Act contract?      c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest  land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)),  timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section  4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as  defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?       d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land  to non‐forest use?      e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which,  due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of  Farmland, to non‐agricultural use or conversion of forest  land to non‐forest use?         Discussion  No agricultural uses are located in the DSASP Plan Area, and the area does not contain any Prime  Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, forest land, timberland, timberland  production, or forest land. The California Important Farmland Finder map designates lands within  the DSASP Plan Area, including the project site, as Urban and Built‐Up Land.1 The project site is  located in a built‐out urban environment, and therefore would not convert farmland to a non‐ agricultural use. The proposed project would not conflict with any agricultural zoning use or a  Williamson Act contract. There are no agriculturally‐zoned land uses or Williamson Act contracts                                                               1  California, State of, 2016. Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder (map).  Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff (accessed November 6, 2018).  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐7  within the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, there would be no new or more significant impacts  than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to agricultural resources.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the agriculture and forestry impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.  3. AIR QUALITY  Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air  pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable  air quality plan?       b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially  to an existing or projected air quality violation?       c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any  criteria pollutant for which the project region is non‐ attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air  quality standard, including releasing emissions that exceed  quantitative threshold for ozone precursors?       d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant  concentrations, including, but not limited to, substantial  levels of toxic air contaminants?        e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number  of people?         Discussion  The proposed project is located in the City of South San Francisco, and is within the jurisdiction of  the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), which regulates air quality in the San  Francisco Bay Area. Air quality conditions in the San Francisco Bay Area have improved significantly  since the BAAQMD was created in 1955. Ambient concentrations of air pollutants and the number of  days during which the region exceeds air quality standards have fallen substantially. In South San  Francisco, and the rest of the air basin, exceeding air quality standards occurs primarily during    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐8  meteorological conditions conducive to high pollution levels, such as cold, windless winter nights or  hot, sunny summer afternoons.   Within the BAAQMD, ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen  dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), and lead (Pb) have been set by  both the State of California and the federal government. The State has also set standards for sulfate  and visibility. The BAAQMD is under State non‐attainment status for ozone and particulate matter  standards. The BAAQMD is classified as non‐attainment for the federal ozone 8‐hour standard and  non‐attainment for the federal PM2.5 24‐hour standard.  Clean Air Plan Consistency  An air quality plan describes air pollution control strategies to be implemented by a city, county, or  region classified as a non‐attainment area. The main purpose of an air quality plan is to bring an area  into compliance with the requirements of federal and State air quality standards.    The BAAQMD guidelines were referenced to determine if the project would conflict with or obstruct  implementation of an applicable air quality plan, which for the DSASP FEIR was the 2010 Clean Air  Plan.2 The 2010 Clean Air Plan is a comprehensive plan to improve Bay Area air quality and protect  public health. The 2010 Clean Air Plan defines control strategies to reduce emissions and ambient  concentrations of air pollutants; safeguard public health by reducing exposure to air pollutants that  pose the greatest heath risk, with an emphasis on protecting the communities most heavily affected  by air pollution; and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to protect the climate. Consistency with the  Clean Air Plan can be determined if the project does the following: 1) supports the goals of the Clean  Air Plan; 2) includes applicable control measures from the Clean Air Plan; and 3) would not disrupt  or hinder implementation of any control measures from the Clean Air Plan.  The DSASP FEIR determined that the DSASP would implement applicable control measures of the  2010 Clean Air Plan and would not hinder implementation of any control measure. However, the  DSASP would result in significant and unavoidable long‐term operational impacts related to air  quality violations, even with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐2, which requires  project applicants to demonstrate implementation of recommended BAAQMD measures as  necessary to reduce operational emissions of criteria air pollutants.  Thus, the DSASP would result in  a significant and unavoidable impact related to consistency with the applicable Clean Air Plan.  The BAAQMD’s current clean air plan is the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan (Clean Air Plan).3 Similar to  the 2010 Clean Air Plan, consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan can be determined if the project:  1) supports the goals of the Clean Air Plan; 2) includes applicable control measures from the Clean  Air Plan; and 3) would not disrupt or hinder implementation of any control measures from the Clean  Air Plan.  The proposed project would involve the demolition of all existing structures and associated  pavements on the project site and the construction of a seven‐story mixed‐use residential building                                                               2  Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2010. Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan.  3  Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017. Clean Air Plan. April 19.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐9  that would include 94 residential units and 3,630 square feet of commercial retail space. The  proposed project would locate future residents within walking distance of public transportation,  jobs, restaurants, and services. Therefore, the project would promote the BAAQMD’s initiatives to  reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and would increase the use of alternate means of  transportation. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with the latest Cal  Green Building Code standards. Therefore, the project would not disrupt or hinder implementation  of a control measure from the Clean Air Plan. In addition, as discussed below, the project would  result in less‐than‐significant construction and operation‐period emissions. Therefore, this impact  would be less than significant.  Construction‐Related Impacts  Similar to the DSASP, construction activities associated with the proposed project would temporarily  affect local air quality. Construction‐period activities such as earthmoving and construction vehicle  traffic would generate exhaust emissions and fugitive particulate matter emissions that would affect  local and regional air quality. Construction activities are also a source of organic gas emissions.  Solvents in adhesives, non‐water‐based paints, thinners, some insulating material, and caulking  materials would evaporate into the atmosphere and would participate in the photochemical  reaction that creates urban ozone. Asphalt used in paving is also a source of organic gases for a  short time after its application. Construction dust could affect local air quality at various times  during construction of the proposed project. The dry, windy climate of the area during the summer  months creates a high potential for dust generation when, and if, underlying materials are exposed  to the atmosphere. The effects of construction activities would be increased dustfall and locally  elevated levels of particulate matter downwind of construction activity.  The DSASP FEIR identified a potentially significant impact related to construction activities  associated with buildout of the DSASP. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR identified Mitigation Measure  MM4.2‐1, which requires implementation of the BAAQMD Additional Construction Mitigation  Measures as necessary for individual projects to reduce construction emissions to below significance  thresholds. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1, which requires projects  where construction emissions are anticipated to exceed the most recent City‐adopted thresholds to  implement both the BAAQMD Basic Construction Mitigation Measures and Additional Construction  Mitigation Measures. Although Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) emissions would be reduced to below  the significance thresholds, Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions would still potentially exceed the  threshold. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR determined that impacts would be significant and  unavoidable.   Construction emissions were estimated for the proposed project using the California Emissions  Estimator Model version 2016.3.2 (CalEEMod). Construction of the proposed project would involve  the demolition of all existing structures and associated pavements on the project site, totaling  approximately 15,100 square feet in size. Approximately 408 net cubic yards would be excavated  from the project site to create a level pad. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to  occur over approximately 25 months, starting in March 2020 and ending in April 2022. Other specific  construction details are not yet known; therefore, default assumptions (e.g., construction fleet    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐10  activities) from CalEEMod were used based on the land use inputs. Construction‐related emissions  are presented in Table 1. CalEEMod output sheets are included in Appendix A.  Table 1: Project Construction Emissions in Pounds Per Day  Project Construction  ROG  NOx   Exhaust  PM2.5  Total PM2.5   Exhaust  PM10  Total PM10   Average Daily Emissions 6.0 2.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6  BAAQMD Thresholds 54.0 54.0 54.0 N/A 82.0 N/A  Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No  Source: LSA (December 2018).  NA = Not Applicable; no BAAQMD threshold    As shown in Table 1, construction emissions associated with the proposed project would be less  than significant for ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, exhaust PM2.5, and exhaust PM10 emissions. As identified  above, the DSASP FEIR required the implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1 to reduce  potential construction‐related impacts to less‐than‐significant levels. Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1  requires that projects that exceed the BAAQMD’s thresholds shall implement the BAAQMD  Additional Construction Mitigation Measures to reduce construction emissions of criteria air  pollutants to below significance criteria. Since construction of the proposed project would not  exceed the BAAQMD’s thresholds, this impact would be less than significant and Mitigation Measure  MM4.2‐1, as described above, would not be required.  Regional Air Pollutant Emissions  The proposed project would include the construction of a seven‐story mixed‐use residential building  that would include 94 residential units and 3,630 square feet of commercial retail space. The  proposed project would result in mobile source emissions from increased vehicle trips to the project  site, energy source emissions from increased electricity and natural gas usage, and area source  emissions such as emissions generated from the use of landscaping equipment, consumer products,  and architectural coatings.  The DSASP FEIR identified that implementation of the DSASP would not result in significant ROG,  NOx, SO, SO2, and PM2.5 emissions. However, the DSASP FEIR identified that the DSASP would result  in a level of PM10 emissions that would exceed the significance thresholds. Therefore, the DSASP  FEIR determined that impacts related to emissions of PM10 during project operation would be  potentially significant. The DSASP FEIR identified Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐2 to reduce individual  project emissions to below a significant level. However, the DSASP FEIR determined that operational  emissions associated with the DSASP would be significant and unavoidable.   Development of the proposed project would also result in regional and local air quality emissions as  identified in the DSASP FEIR, including long‐term project‐related emissions associated with the  ozone precursors ROG and particulate matter. Emission estimates for operation of the proposed  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐11  project were calculated using CalEEMod, consistent with BAAQMD recommendations.4 The daily  emissions associated with project operational trip generation, energy, and area sources are  identified in Table 1 for ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5. CalEEMod output sheets are included in  Appendix A.  Table 2: Project Operational Emissions  Emission Category  Reactive Organic  Gases (ROG)  Nitrogen Oxides  (NOx) PM10  PM2.5   Emissions in Pounds Per Day  Area Source  2.9 0.7 0.1 0.1  Energy Source 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0  Mobile Source 1.0 4.3 2.8 0.8  Total Emissions 3.9 5.3 2.9 0.9  BAAQMD Significance Threshold 54.0 54.0 82.0 54.0  Exceed? No No No No  Emissions in Tons Per Year  Area Source  0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0  Energy Source 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  Mobile Source 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.1  Total Emissions 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.1  BAAQMD Significance Threshold 10.0 10.0 15.0 10.0  Exceed? No No No No  Source: LSA (December 2018).    The results shown in Table 2 indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance  criteria for daily ROG, NOx, PM10 or PM2.5 emissions; therefore, the proposed project would not have  a significant effect on regional air quality and Mitigation Measure MM 4.2‐2 would not be required.  Local Community Risk and Hazard Impacts to Sensitive Receptors  Sensitive receptors are defined as residential uses, schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, and  medical centers. Individuals particularly vulnerable to diesel particulate matter are children, whose  lung tissue is still developing, and the elderly, who may have serious health problems that can be  aggravated by exposure to diesel particulate matter. Exposure from diesel exhaust associated with  construction activity contributes to both cancer and chronic non‐cancer health risks.  According to the BAAQMD, a project would result in a significant impact if it would: individually  expose sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants (TACs) resulting in an increased cancer risk  greater than 10.0 in one million, increased non‐cancer risk of greater than 1.0 on the hazard index  (chronic or acute), or an annual average ambient PM2.5 increase greater than 0.3 micrograms per                                                               4  It should be noted that emissions estimates were based on the trip generation data provided in the Traffic  Study, which evaluated potential impacts associated with the development of 98 residential units on the  project site. The proposed project has since been revised to include 4 fewer units (94 units are proposed).  Therefore, the analysis of project operational emissions is conservative and mobile source emissions are  slightly overestimated.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐12  cubic meter (µg/m3). A significant cumulative impact would occur if the Project in combination with  other projects located within a 1,000‐foot radius of the Project site would expose sensitive receptors  to TACs resulting in an increased cancer risk greater than 100.0 in one million, an increased non‐ cancer risk of greater than 10.0 on the hazard index (chronic), or an ambient PM2.5 increase greater  than 0.8 µg/m3 on an annual average basis. Impacts from substantial pollutant concentrations are  discussed below.   As discussed in the DSASP FEIR, the DSASP Plan Area contains potential stationary sources of TACs,  such as industrial uses, gas stations, and dry cleaners, and potential mobile sources, associated with  major roadways and the adjacent rail line. The DSASP FEIR determined that impacts related to TAC  emissions from US 101, gas stations, and dry‐cleaning facilities are considered a potentially  significant impact. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR requires individual projects that would include  sensitive receptors to comply with Mitigation Measures MM4.2‐3, which requires a health risk  assessment (HRA).   An HRA5 was prepared for the proposed project, which evaluates construction period health risk to  off‐site receptors and stationary and mobile source emissions and their related health risk impacts  for future residents of the project. Results of the HRA, which is included as Appendix B, are  summarized below.  Construction Health Risk Assessment. The project site is located in an urban area approximately  120 feet from existing residential uses that could be exposed to diesel emission exhaust during the  construction period. To estimate the potential cancer risk associated with construction of the  proposed project from equipment exhaust (including diesel particulate matter), a dispersion model  was used to translate an emission rate from the source location to a concentration at the receptor  location of interest (i.e., a nearby residence and worksites). Dispersion modeling varies from a  simpler, more conservative screening‐level analysis to a more complex and refined detailed analysis.  This refined assessment was conducted using CARB exposure methodology with the air dispersion  modeling performed using the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dispersion  model AERMOD. The model provides a detailed estimate of exhaust concentrations based on site  and source geometry, source emissions strength, distance from the source to the receptor, and  meteorological data from the San Francisco International Airport. Table 3 identifies the results of the  analysis utilizing the CalEEMod default of Tier 0 construction Equipment. Model input and output  data used in the construction HRA are shown in Appendix B of the HRA.                                                               5  LSA Associates, Inc., 2019. Health Risk Assessment for 200 Airport Boulevard. January.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐13  Table 3: Unmitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction   to Off‐Site Receptors    Carcinogenic  Inhalation Health  Risk in One Million  Chronic Inhalation  Hazard Index  Acute Inhalation  Hazard Index  Annual PM2.5  Concentration  (µg/m3)  Maximum Exposed  Individual Location  (Residential)  14.1 0.03 0.0 0.07  Threshold 10.0 1.0 1.0 0.30  Source: LSA (January 2019).    As shown in Table 3, the risk would be 14.1 in one million, which would exceed the BAAQMD cancer  risk threshold of 10 in one million. The highest chronic hazard index would be 0.03, which would not  exceed the threshold of 1.0. In addition, the highest acute hazard index would be 0.0, which would  also not exceed the threshold of 1.0. The results of the analysis indicate that the maximum PM2.5  concentration would be 0.07 µg/m3, which would not exceed the BAAQMD significance threshold of  0.30 µg/m3. As indicated above, the cancer risk of 14.1 in one million would exceed the BAAQMD’s  threshold.  The potential for individual development projects to exceed BAAQMD thresholds for construction  emissions was identified as a significant and unavoidable impact in the DSASP FEIR (Impact 4.2‐2).  Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1 in the DSASP FEIR requires individual development projects that  exceed these thresholds to implement the BAAQMD’s Additional Construction Mitigation Measures  to further reduce these impacts, to the extent feasible.  Implementation of the following project specific condition of approval would be required to reduce  substantial pollutant concentrations during project construction and would reduce this impact of  the project to a less‐than‐significant level.  Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 1: In compliance with the requirements of DSASP  Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐1, the project contractor shall ensure all off‐road diesel‐powered  construction equipment used for the project meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB)  Tier 2 emissions standards and are retrofitted with a level 3 diesel particulate filter or  equivalent.  Table 4 identifies the results of the analysis with implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of  Approval 1.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐14  Table 4: Mitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction   to Off‐Site Receptors    Carcinogenic  Inhalation Health  Risk in One Million  Chronic Inhalation  Hazard Index  Acute Inhalation  Hazard Index  Annual PM2.5  Concentration  (µg/m3)  Maximum Exposed  Individual Location  (Residential)  7.6 0.02 0.0 0.07  Threshold 10.0 1.0 1.0 0.30  Source: LSA (January 2019).    As shown in Table 4, the mitigated risk would be 7.6 in one million, which would not exceed the  BAAQMD cancer risk of 10 in one million threshold. Therefore, with implementation of Project‐ Specific Condition of Approval 1, construction of the project would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds  and would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. This  impact would be considered less than significant with mitigation.  Stationary Sources. The stationary source analysis evaluated the risk levels from permitted sources  in the project vicinity, using the toxic air contaminant emissions reported to the BAAQMD by the  stationary sources identified in the project vicinity. The BAAQMD indicates six sources of emissions  that are within 1,000 feet of the project site; including four gas stations, one generator, and one  auto body shop. Following BAAQMD guidance, the stationary sources were scaled for distance using  the BAAQMD Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) Distance Multiplier Tool and Diesel Internal  Combustion (IC) Engine Distance Multiplier Tool, both of which are shown in Appendix B. The results  of the stationary source analysis are presented in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, the highest risk  would be 6.55 in one million, which would not exceed the BAAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in  one million. The hazard index would be 0.011, which is below the threshold of 1.0. The results of the  analysis also indicate that PM2.5 concentration would not exceed the BAAQMD significance  threshold of 0.3 µg/m3. The BAAQMD’s cumulative threshold of cancer risk greater than 100.0 in one  million, an increased non‐cancer risk of greater than 10.0 on the hazard index (chronic), or an  ambient PM2.5 increase greater than 0.8 µg/m3 on an annual average basis would not be exceeded.  Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐15  Table 5: Stationary Sources  Facility ID  Plant  ID Stationary Source  Distance  (feet)  Adjusted Adult  Carcinogenic  Risk  (in one million)  PM2.5  (μg/m3) Hazard  1110 G10695 South City Shell – 123 Linden Avenue  (gas station) 774 0.27 N/A 0.000  1208 G9214 Unocal #1020 ‐‐Grand Martco Inc. –  221 Airport Boulevard (gas station) 130 6.55 N/A 0.011  219 G11137 Chico's Service Station ‐‐‐ 401 Linden  Avenue (gas station) 946 0.09 N/A 0.002  189 11618 Carrera Auto Body/ Tai Shing Auto,  Inc. – 99 Linden Avenue 894 0.00 0.00 0.001  1113 18877 South San Francisco Water Quality –  27 South Linden Avenue (generator)  891 0.08 0.00 0.001  645 G11009 Hertz – 177 South Airport Boulevard  (gas station)  883 0.09 N/A 0.002  Maximum Single Source Risks 6.55 0.000 0.011  BAAQMD Single Source Threshold 10 in one million 0.30 1.000  Exceeds Threshold? No No No  Total Risk 7.08 0.000 0.017  BAAQMD Cumulative Threshold 100 in one  million 0.80 10.0  Exceeds Threshold? No No No  Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2018); LSA (January 2019).    Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment. To estimate the potential cancer risk associated with the  proposed project from diesel vehicle engine exhaust, a dispersion model was used to evaluate the  emissions from US 101, Airport Boulevard, and the nearby rail line. The model provides the  concentration of emissions at the proposed project site, and potential health risks are then  estimated. Dispersion modeling varies from the simpler, more conservative screening‐level analysis  to the more complex and refined detailed analysis. This assessment was conducted using the EPA  dispersion model AERMOD. The model provides a detailed estimate of concentrations considering  site and source geometry, source strength, distance to receptor, wake effects on plume distribution,  and meteorological data from San Francisco International Airport. Further model details are  included in the HRA in Appendix B.  The results of the inhalation risk analysis are shown in Table 6. Results indicate that vehicle exhaust  concentrations on the project site would exceed the individual source significance thresholds  established by the BAAQMD.   The potential for individual development projects to result in health risks to sensitive receptors was  identified as a less than significant impact in the DSASP FEIR (Impact 4.2‐4), because it was assumed  that for any individual development project that would result in a potential health risk, the health  risk would be reduced through the implementation of project‐specific mitigation measures, or the  project would sited in another location. The HRA for the project was prepared in compliance with    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐16  DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐3, in order to identify the potential health risk of siting  residential uses within the vicinity of potential sources of toxic air contaminants.    Table 6: Unmitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Mobile Sources  Source  Carcinogenic  Inhalation Health Risk  Chronic Inhalation  Hazard Index  Acute Inhalation  Hazard Index PM2.5  US 101  22.10 0.0055 0.000 0.04  Airport Boulevard 1.08 0.0003 0.000 0.04  Rail Line 0.49 0.0001 0.000 0.04  Single Source Threshold 10.0 1.0 1.0 0.30  Exceed? (yes/no) Yes No No No  Source: LSA (January 2019).    As indicated in Table 6, the cancer risk level of 22.1 in one million associated with US 101 would  exceed the BAAQMD’s 10 in one million threshold. Therefore, mitigation would be required to  reduce potential health risks associated with traffic on US 101 to below the BAAQMD’s significance  thresholds. Therefore, the following Project‐Specific Condition of Approval shall be implemented by  the project applicant and would reduce this impact of the project to a less‐than‐significant level.  Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2: In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measures  MM4.2‐3, the following measures shall be required to reduce health risks to a level sufficient to  achieve compliance with BAAQMD thresholds:   The project applicant shall provide a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)  system with a control efficiency sufficient to result in a reduction of a minimum 75.0 percent  of particulates of 2.5 microns or less, such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV)‐ 12 filters or greater, for indoor air filtration systems. The ventilation system shall be certified  to achieve the stated performance effectiveness from indoor areas.    All air intakes shall be located as far away from US 101 as feasible.    The project applicant shall ensure the proper indications on the specifications for  maintaining the installed air filtration system are provided to future residents of the project  site.   Table 7 identifies the results of the analysis with implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of  Approval 2.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐17  Table 7: Mitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Mobile Sources  Source  Carcinogenic  Inhalation Health Risk  Chronic Inhalation  Hazard Index  Acute Inhalation  Hazard Index PM2.5  US 101  5.53 0.0055 0.000 0.04  Airport Boulevard 1.08 0.0003 0.000 0.04  Rail Line 0.49 0.0001 0.000 0.04  Single Source Threshold 10.0 1.0 1.0 0.30  Exceed? (yes/no) No No No No  Source: LSA (January 2019).    Implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2 would reduce the health risk impacts to  below the BAAQMD’s thresholds. As shown in Table 7, with implementation of Project‐Specific  Condition of Approval 2, the highest cancer risk would be 5.53 in one million for the MEI, which is  below the BAAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in one million. The Chronic Hazard Index would be  0.0055, which is below the threshold of 1.0 and the acute Hazard Index would be below the  threshold of 1.0. The results of the analysis also indicate that the maximum PM2.5 concentration  would be 0.04 µg/m3, which is also below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 0.3 µg/m3.  Therefore, with implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2, traffic on US 101 would  not expose future residents of the project site to health risk levels that would exceed the criteria  established by the BAAQMD. With mitigation, implementation of the project would not expose  sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. This impact would be considered less  than significant with mitigation.  Cumulative Analysis. The cumulative analysis sums all sources of emissions in the vicinity of the  project site including stationary source and mobile sources. The cumulative cancer risk, hazard  index, acute index and PM2.5 concentrations are shown in Table 8. Results of the cumulative analysis  indicate the proposed project would not expose future residents of the project site to significant  cumulative health risks. This impact would be less than significant.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐18  Table 8: Cumulative Risk from All Sources  Source  Carcinogenic  Inhalation  Health Risk  Chronic  Inhalation  Hazard Index  Acute  Inhalation  Hazard Index PM2.5   South City Shell – 123 Linden Avenue   (gas station) 0.27 N/A 0.000 N/A  Unocal #1020 – Grand Martco Inc.   221 Airport Boulevard (gas station) 6.55 N/A 0.011 N/A  Chico's Service Station – 401 Linden Avenue 0.09 N/A 0.002 N/A  Carrera Auto Body/ Tai Shing Auto, Inc.   – 99 Linden Avenue 0.00 N/A 0.001 0.00  South San Francisco Water Quality   – 27 South Linden Avenue (generator)  0.08 N/A 0.001 0.00  Hertz – 177 South Airport Boulevard   (gas station)  0.09 N/A 0.002 N/A  US 101  5.53 0.0055 0.000 0.04  Airport Boulevard 1.08 0.0003 0.000 0.04  Rail Line 0.49 0.0001 0.00 0.04  Total 14.18 0.0059 0.017 0.12  Cumulative Threshold 100.0 10.0 10.0 0.80  Exceed? (yes/no) No No No No  Source: LSA (January 2019).    Objectionable Odors  The DSASP FEIR identified a potential significant impact related to odors. As discussed in the DSASP  FEIR, construction associated with the DSASP could result in minor amounts of odor associated with  diesel heavy equipment exhaust; however because construction equipment would operate at  various locations throughout the DSASP boundary, construction would not take place all at once,  and because any operations near existing receptors would be temporary, impacts associated with  odors during construction would not be significant. The proposed project would not increase odor  impacts during construction beyond those evaluated in the DSASP FEIR and would have a less‐than‐ significant impact related to odors during the construction period.  In addition, as discussed in the DSASP FEIR, the DSASP would include the construction of new  industrial uses in the area south of Railroad Avenue and west of Airport Boulevard. The DSASP FEIR  determined that odor impacts related to industrial land uses would be potentially significant.  Therefore, the DSASP FEIR identified Mitigation Measure MM4.2‐6, which would require new  industrial land uses identified in the BAAQM CEQA Guidelines or ARB Air Quality and Land Use  Handbook as a typical source of odors to demonstrate best practices to minimize odors to reduce  this impact to a less‐than‐significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not  include any new industrial uses. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and Mitigation  Measure MM4.2‐6 would not be applicable to the proposed project.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐19  Applicable Mitigation  As noted above, DSASP FEIR Mitigation Measures 4.2‐2 and 4.2‐6 would not be applicable to the  proposed project. Implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 1 would ensure that  construction period health risk to off‐site receptors would be less than significant. In addition,  Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 2 would ensure stationary and mobile source emissions and  their related health risk impacts for future residents of the project would be reduced to a less‐than‐ significant level. Both Project‐Specific Conditions of Approval would be consistent with the  mitigation measures from the DSASP FEIR listed below.   MM4.2‐1: Construction emissions for all future development under the Specific Plan shall be  quantified prior to the start of construction. For projects where construction emissions are  anticipated to exceed the most recent City‐adopted thresholds, in addition to the BAAQMD Basic  Construction Mitigation Measures, construction activities shall implement the BAAQMD  Additional Construction Mitigation Measures to reduce construction emissions of criteria air  pollutants to below significance criteria. Mitigation reductions shall be quantified prior to the  start of construction to demonstrate that adequate measures have been identified to reduce  project emissions. The Additional Construction Mitigation Measures include the following:  1. All exposed surfaces shall be watered at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil  moisture of 12 percent. Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe.  2. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind  speeds exceed 20 mph.  3. Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively  disturbed areas of construction. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air  porosity.  4. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast‐germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in  disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is  established.  5. The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground‐disturbing construction  activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities shall be phased to  reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time.  6. All trucks and equipment, including their tires, shall be washed off prior to leaving the site.  7. Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road shall be treated with a 6‐ to 12‐ inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel.  8. Sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff to public  roadways from sites with a slope greater than 1 percent.  9. Minimizing the idling time of diesel powered construction equipment to two minutes.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐20  10. The project shall develop a plan demonstrating that the off‐road equipment (more than 50  horsepower) to be used in the construction project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor  vehicles) would achieve a project wide fleet‐average 20 percent NOX reduction and 45  percent PM reduction compared to the most recent California ARB fleet average. Acceptable  options for reducing emissions include the use of late model engines, low‐emission diesel  products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, aftertreatment products, add‐on  devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such become available.  11. Use low‐ROG coatings beyond the local requirements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural  Coatings).  12. All construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators shall be equipped with Best  Available Control Technology for emission reductions of NOX and PM.  13. All contractors shall use equipment that meets California ARB’s most recent certification  standard for off‐road heavy‐duty diesel engines.   MM4.2‐3: Siting Sensitive Receptors near Potential TAC Source. A Health Risk Assessment (HRA)  shall be prepared by a qualified air quality professional for development of a project that would  introduce new sensitive receptors in the study area within the siting distance for any use listed in  ARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook Table 1‐1 (reproduced here as Table 4.2‐11  [Recommendations on Siting New Sensitive Land Uses]). Sensitive receptors include day care  centers, schools, retirement homes, hospitals, medical patients in residential homes, or other  facilities that may house individuals with health conditions that would be adversely impacted by  changes in air quality. Such a project shall not be considered for approval until an HRA has been  completed and approved by the City. The methodology for the HRA shall follow the Office of  Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and BAAQMD guidelines for the preparation of HRAs.  If a potentially significant health risk is identified, the HRA shall identify appropriate measures to  reduce the potential health risk to below a significant level or the sensitive receptor shall be sited  in another location.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 7.3‐G‐1: Continue to work toward improving air quality and meeting all national and State  ambient air quality standards and by reducing the generation of air pollutants both from  stationary and mobile sources, where feasible.   Policy 7.3‐G‐4: Encourage land use and transportation strategies that promote use of  alternatives to the automobile for transportation, including bicycling, bus transit, and carpooling.   Policy 7.3‐G‐5: Promote clean and alternative fuel combustion in mobile equipment and vehicles.   Policy 7.3‐G‐6: Minimize conflicts between sensitive receptors and emissions generators by  distancing them from one another.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐21   Policy 7.3‐I‐1: Cooperate with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to achieve  emissions reductions for nonattainment pollutants and their precursors, including carbon  monoxide, ozone, and PM10, by implementation of air pollution control measures as required by  State and federal statutes.   Policy 7.3‐I‐2: Use the City’s development review process and the California Environmental  Quality Act (CEQA) regulations to evaluate and mitigate the local and cumulative effects of new  development on air quality and GHG emissions.     Policy 7.3‐I‐3: Adopt the standard construction dust abatement measures included in BAAQMD’s  CEQA Guidelines.   Policy 7.3‐I‐4: Require new residential development and remodeled existing homes to install  clean‐burning fireplaces and wood stoves.   Policy 7.3‐I‐5: In cooperation with local conservation groups, institute an active urban forest  management program that consists of planting new trees and maintaining existing ones.   Policy 7.3‐I‐9: Promote land uses that facilitate alternative transit use, including high‐density  housing, mixed uses, and affordable housing served by alternative transit infrastructure.   Policy 7.3‐I‐10: Facilitate energy efficiency in building regulations and streamlined review  processes, providing flexibility to achieve specified energy performance levels and requiring  energy efficiency measures as appropriate.  The proposed project would further the above listed policies because it would consist of a mixed‐ use building within close proximity to both an existing and planned transit station, promote  alternative transportation modes by providing streetscape and infrastructure improvements,  including electric vehicle charging stations, and be consistent with the BAAQMD’s Clean Air Plan.  Conclusion  With implementation of Project‐Specific Conditions of Approval 1 and 2, which are consistent with  the mitigation measures from the DSASP FEIR listed above, the proposed project would not result in  any significant air quality impacts.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐22  4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through  habitat modifications, on any species identified as a  candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species in local or  regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California  Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife  Service?        b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or  other sensitive natural community identified in local or  regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California  Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife  Service?        c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected  wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act  (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,  etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological  interruption, or other means?        d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native  resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with  established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,  or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?        e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting  biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or  ordinance?        f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat  Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,  or other approved local, regional, or state habitat  conservation plan?         Discussion  Protected Plants and Wildlife, Riparian Habitat, and Federally Protected Wetlands  The DSASP Plan Area is currently developed with residential, commercial, and office uses. There are  no large open spaces in the vicinity of the project site. Open space within the DSASP Plan Area  consists of developed parkland, mostly graded vacant lots, and a portion of the Pacific Gas and  Electric (PG&E) transmission corridor.  The City’s General Plan identifies the areas of the City that support biological resources, which  generally consist of San Bruno Mountain, Sign Hill, and wetland areas along Colma Creek.6 The City  requires assessment and protection of biological resources for development in these areas. The                                                               6  South San Francisco, City of, 2014. South San Francisco General Plan. Open Space and Conservation  Element, as amended. February 12.   ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐23  DSASP Plan Area is not located in an area that supports biological resources. Only a small portion on  the southern boundary of the DSASP Plan Area, east of San Mateo Avenue, is adjacent to the Colma  Creek Canal, which is located approximately 0.35 miles from the project site.  Riparian habitat in South San Francisco is limited to along Colma Creek and along the San Francisco  Bay Fringe. The DSASP does not propose any land use directly adjacent to the canal and the area  directly adjacent to the canal is currently in use for utility infrastructure and right‐of‐way. The  proposed project site is located approximately 0.35 miles from the canal area and development of  the site would not affect any riparian habitats or wetland areas. Therefore, there would be no new  or more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to sensitive  plan or animal species.   Wildlife Movement Corridors, Local Policies or Ordinances  Development activities associated with the proposed project would not occur within an area  containing habitat that supports biological resources. Therefore, the proposed project would have  no impact on wildlife movement corridors. Landscaping vegetation within the DSASP Plan Area  could provide potential nesting habitat for migrating birds. If vegetation removal were to occur  during the February 1 through August 31 bird nesting period, construction would be required to  comply with applicable regulations in the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3513, or  3800), which would protect nesting birds from construction disturbances and this would be required  as a condition of approval.  Landscaped areas in the project site may contain trees defined as protected by the South San  Francisco Tree Preservation Ordinance. Development activities could involve removal or pruning of  protected trees. However, such activities would be required to comply with the Tree Preservation  Ordinance as part of the project approval process, including obtaining a permit for any tree  removals or alterations of protected trees, and avoiding tree roots during trenching for utilities. This  would be required as a condition of approval. Therefore, there would be no new or more significant  impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to wildlife movement corridors or  local policies.   Habitat Conservation Plan  There are no Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Communities Conservation Plans, or other  approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that are applicable to the DSASP Plan  Area or proposed project. Therefore, there would be no new or more significant impacts than those  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐24  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the biological resource impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.  5. CULTURAL RESOURCES    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a  historical resource as defined in §15064.5?       b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an  archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?       c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological  resource or site or unique geologic feature?      d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred  outside of formal cemeteries?        Discussion  Unless otherwise noted, the following section is based on a Historical Resource Evaluation (HRE)  prepared for the proposed project by LSA in October 2018,7 which is included in Appendix C.  Historic Resources  The DSASP FEIR identifies 12 historic resources within the DSASP Plan Area and an additional 12  sites within 0.5 mile of the area boundaries. Although the Grand Avenue commercial corridor was  suggested as a historic district, it was never formally designated. The DSASP FEIR concluded that  there were potential impacts to these resources only for project sites located on or directly adjacent  to a historic resource. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.3‐1 in the DSASP FEIR requires a  qualified professional to conduct a site‐specific historical resource evaluation for future  development within the DSASP Plan Area that would demolish or otherwise physically affect  buildings or structures 45 years or older or would otherwise affect their historic setting. As noted  above, an HRE has been prepared for the project site.   The HRE concluded that none of the existing buildings appear eligible for inclusion of the California  Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) of the City’s List of Designated and Potential Historic  Resources under any significance criteria. Therefore, because the proposed project would not result  in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, there would be no new or  more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to historic                                                               7  LSA Associates, Inc., 2018. Historical Resource Evaluation of 200, 206, 210, and 214 Airport Boulevard,  South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California (LSA Project #FFD1801). October 9.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐25  cultural resources. Therefore, the requirements of Mitigation Measure MM4.3‐1 have been satisfied  and no additional mitigation is necessary.  Archaeological Resources  The proposed project would not cause a potentially significant impact to any known archaeological  resources in the project vicinity. However, the DSASP FEIR concluded that there is a high potential  for new development facilitated by the DSASP to disturb previously unrecorded archaeological  resources, which resulted in potentially significant impacts. Mitigation Measures MM4.3‐2 through  MM4.3‐4 of the DSASP FEIR require that prior to any earth‐disturbing activities (e.g., excavation,  trenching, grading) or in the event that any deposit of prehistoric or historic archaeological materials  are encountered during project construction activities, all work within 100 feet shall be stopped and  a qualified archaeologist be contacted to assess the deposit and make recommendations, possibly  including complete avoidance of the resources, in‐place preservation, and/or data recovery.  Additionally, prior to the initiation of construction, the construction manager will undergo worker  environmental awareness training or provide evidence of such training that is City‐approved. These  measures, which shall be required as conditions of approval for the proposed project, would reduce  the potential impacts of the proposed project on archaeological resources to a less‐than‐significant  level. Therefore, there would be no new or more significant impacts than those previously analyzed  in the DSASP FEIR related to archaeological resources.  Paleontological Resources  The proposed project would not cause a potentially significant impact to any known paleontological  resources in the project vicinity. The DSASP FEIR concluded that earthmoving activities associated  with development facilitated by the DSASP could potentially disrupt, alter, or eliminate previously  undiscovered paleontological resources, which resulted in a potentially significant impact.  Pursuant  to MM 4.3‐5 in the DSASP FEIR, the proposed project would not encounter undisturbed soils, as the  site is completely developed, and therefore would not be required to retain a paleontologist.  Instead, the proposed project would be required to demonstrate non‐disturbance through the  appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth‐disturbing activities. The  Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation8 prepared for the proposed project did not identify any  unique paleontological resources within the project site.   Pursuant to Mitigation Measure MM 4.3‐6 in the DSASP FEIR, should paleontological resources or  unique geologic features be identified at a particular site during project construction, construction  shall cease within 100 feet of the fin and the City shall be notified. A City‐approved paleontologist  shall assess the significance of the find and impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to  a less‐than‐significant level through methods determined adequate by paleontologist and as  approved by the City. These measures, which shall be required as conditions of approval for the  project, would reduce the potential impacts of the proposed project on paleontological resources to  a less‐than‐significant level, consistent with the DSASP FEIR. Therefore, there would be no new or                                                               8  Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2018. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 7‐Story Mixed‐Use  Development, South San Francisco, California. June 18.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐26  more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to paleontological  resources.  Disturbance of Human Remains  The proposed project would not cause a potentially significant impact to any known cemeteries or  human remains in the project vicinity. However, should any human remains be found during  construction activities associated with the proposed project, the DSASP FEIR identifies California  Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requiring that no further disturbances shall occur until the  County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains  pursuant to State law, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 outlines the Native American Heritage  Commission notification process and the required procedures if the County Coroner determines the  human remains to be Native America. Compliance with this standard regulation would protect  unknown and previously unidentified human remains, and impacts related to unknown human  remains would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, there would  be no new or more significant impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to  the disturbance of human remains.  Applicable Mitigation  The following mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed project. The HRE prepared for the  proposed project determined that the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse  change in the significance of a historical resource; therefore, the requirements of Mitigation  Measure MM4.3‐1 have been satisfied.  Construction of the proposed project could result in impacts to previously unknown archaeological  and paleontological resources or human remains. Implementation of the below mitigation measures  from the DSASP FEIR would ensure that construction of the proposed project would result in a less‐ than‐significant impact. No new mitigation measures would be required.   MM4.3‐3: If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resource as defined  by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, are discovered during any project‐related earth‐disturbing  activities (including projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth‐disturbing  activity within 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of South San Francisco shall be  notified. The project applicant shall retain a City‐approved archaeologist to assess the  significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less‐than‐ significant level through methods determined adequate by the archaeologist as approved by the  City.   MM4.3‐4: Prior to start of construction, all construction personnel involved in ground‐disturbing  activities and the supervision of such activities will undergo worker environmental awareness  training. The archaeological resources training components will be presented by a City‐approved  cultural resources consultant. The training will describe the types of archaeological resources  that may be found in the proposed study area and how to recognize such resources; the  protocols to be followed if archaeological resources are found, including communication  protocols; and the laws relevant to the protection of archaeological resources and the associated  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐27  penalties for breaking these laws. Additionally, prior to construction, City‐approved  archaeological resources consultants will meet with the applicant’s grading and excavation  contractors to provide comments and suggestions concerning monitoring plans and to discuss  excavation and grading plans.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Polices   Policy 7.5‐G‐1: Conserve historic, cultural, and archaeological resources for the aesthetic,  education, economic, and scientific contribution they make to South San Francisco’s identity and  quality of life.   Policy 7.5‐G‐2: Encourage municipal and community awareness, appreciation, and support for  South San Francisco’s historic, cultural, and archaeological resources.   Policy 7.5‐I‐4: Ensure the protection of known archaeological resources in the city by requiring a  records review for any development proposed areas of known resources.   Policy 7.5‐I‐5: In accordance with State law, require the preparation of a resource mitigation plan  and monitoring program by a qualified archaeologist in the event that archaeological resources  are uncovered.  The proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to any historic, cultural, or  archaeological resources and would comply with all applicable State laws in the event that  archaeological resources are discovered, and therefore would comply with the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential cultural resources impacts of the proposed  project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not  required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐28  6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse  effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:       i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on  the most recent Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning  Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based  on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to  Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.       ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?      iii. Seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction?      iv. Landslides?      b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?      c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that  would become unstable as a result of the project, and  potentially result in on‐ or off‐site landslide, lateral  spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?        d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18‐1‐B of  the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks  to life or property?        e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of  septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems  where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste  water?          Discussion  The information presented in this section is based on data and findings provided in the Preliminary  Geotechnical Investigation9 prepared for the proposed project and geologic reports and maps by the  United States Geological Survey (USGS), California Geological Survey (CGS), and others, as available.  Seismicity and Seismic Hazards  The DSASP Plan Area is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone as defined by the Alquist‐Priolo  Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1994 and no known active or potentially active faults traverse the  project site. Therefore, because ground rupture generally occurs at the location of a fault, and no  active faults are known to traverse the DSASP Plan Area, the proposed project would not be subject  to substantial risk of surface fault ruptures.  All structures in the Bay Area could be affected by ground shaking in the event of an earthquake  along regional active faults. A rupture of the Peninsula Segment of the San Andreas Fault could                                                               9  Ibid.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐29  result in intensities registering 7.9 on the Modified Mercalli intensity scale in the DSASP Plan Area.  As noted in the DSASP FEIR, most of the City would experience an intensity level of VII (Nonstruc‐ tural Damage) or VIII (Moderate). Portions of the DSASP Plan Area are located in areas potentially  subject to extremely high or very high levels of ground shaking. The proposed project must adhere  to State and City building code standards, such as the California Building Code (CBC), which defines  minimum acceptable levels or risk and safety. Compliance with existing State and City regulations,  including the CBC, would reduce impacts related to seismic shaking to a less than significant level.  The DSASP Plan Area is located in a seismically active region, and therefore the potential for seismic‐ related ground failure exists, including liquefaction. However, the majority of the DSASP Plan Area,  including the project site, is located within an area of very low susceptibility for liquefaction. As  noted above, the proposed project would be required to adhere to the CBC and the Seismic Hazards  Mapping Act (Pub. Res. Code §2690‐2699.6), which includes requirements for geotechnical  investigation in areas with high risks for liquefaction, including mitigation to minimize risks.  Additionally, the South San Francisco Municipal Code requires a soils engineering report and  engineering geology report that identifies potential geotechnical hazards and makes recommenda‐ tions to minimize hazards. As noted above, a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation was prepared  for the proposed project. All recommendations in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation would  be implemented. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe  impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to seismicity and seismic hazards.  Unstable and Expansive Soils  The DSASP FEIR concluded that earth‐disturbing activities associated with construction would be  temporary and erosion effects would depend largely on the areas excavated, the quantity of  excavation, and the length of time soils are subject to conditions that would be affected by erosion  processes. As noted above, the proposed project would be required to comply with the CBC.  Specifically, the proposed project would be required to comply with CBC Chapters 18, which  regulates excavation activities and the construction of foundations and retaining walls, and CBC  Chapter 33, which regulates safeguarding activities, including drainage and erosion control. As noted  in Section 9 “Hydrology and Water Quality” of this report, the proposed project would be required  to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for  Construction Activities (Construction General Permit). Pursuant to the Construction General Permit,  as part of an erosion control plan, construction site erosion and sedimentation control best  management practices (BMPs) would be implemented and would include such measures as silt  fences, watering for dust control, straw bale check dams, hydroseeding, and other measures.  Further, development under the DSASP will be required to comply with all applicable provisions of  the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP), and requires runoff  management programs that would include BMPs to control erosion and sedimentation. The project  site is generally level, and the proposed project would consist almost entirely of impervious  surfaces. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial erosion or topsoil loss.  The soil in South San Francisco is generally characterized as having a low expansion potential, with  the exception of areas at the base of the San Bruno Mountains or adjacent to the San Francisco Bay.  The DSASP FEIR concluded that development in the DSASP Plan Area would not be located in an    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐30  area at high risk for expansive soils. Additionally, as noted above, the proposed project would be  required to implement all recommendations included in the Preliminary Geotechnical Report, which  would ensure soil‐related hazards are minimized.  The City would continue to provide wastewater service to the project site and the proposed project  would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, the  proposed project would have no new or more severe impacts than those already analyzed in the  DSASP FEIR related to unstable or expansive soils.   Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential impacts related to geology and soils resulting  from the proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and  additional mitigation is not required.  7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or  indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the  environment?       b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation  adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of  greenhouse gases?         Discussion  Individual projects incrementally contribute toward the potential for global climate change on a  cumulative basis in concert with all other past, present, and probable future projects. While  individual projects are unlikely to measurably affect global climate change, each project  incrementally contributes toward the potential for global climate change on a cumulative basis, in  concert with all other past, present, and probable future projects.  Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) are present in the atmosphere naturally, are released by natural sources,  or are formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely  seen as the principal contributors to human‐induced global climate change are:  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐31   Carbon dioxide (CO2);   Methane (CH4);   Nitrous oxide (N2O);   Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs);   Perfluorocarbons (PFCs); and   Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6).  Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the  atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and  enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, believed to be causing global warming. Manmade GHGs  include naturally‐occurring GHGs such as CO2, methane, and N2O. However, some gases, like HFCs,  PFCs, and SF6 are completely new to the atmosphere.  Certain gases, such as water vapor, are short‐lived in the atmosphere. Others remain in the atmos‐ phere for significant periods of time, contributing to climate change in the long term. Water vapor is  excluded from the list of GHGs above because it is short‐lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric  concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation.   These gases vary considerably in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), a concept developed to  compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The GWP is  based on several factors, including the relative effectiveness of a gas to absorb infrared radiation  and length of time that the gas remains in the atmosphere (“atmospheric lifetime”). The GWP of  each gas is measured relative to CO2, the most abundant GHG. The definition of GWP for a particular  GHG is the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of the GHG to the ratio of heat trapped by one  unit mass of CO2 over a specified time period. GHG emissions are typically measured in terms of  pounds or tons of “CO2 equivalents” (CO2e).  Construction Emissions  Construction activities associated with the proposed project would produce combustion emissions  from various sources. During construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of  construction equipment and from worker and builder supply vendor vehicles, each of which typically  use fossil‐based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil‐based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2,  CH4, and N2O. Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust  emissions from on‐site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change.  The DSASP FEIR determined that because GHGs remain in the atmosphere for years, even the  temporary emissions from construction activities would be cumulatively considerable without the  implementation of the BAAQMD recommended BMPs, the General Plan policies, and Climate Action  Plan (CAP) policies to reduce construction‐related GHG emissions. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR  identified Mitigation Measure MM4.4‐1, which requires all construction projects to incorporate, to    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐32  the greatest extent feasible, the most recent Best Management Practices for GHGs as indicated by  the BAAQMD, to ensure compliance with the General Plan and CAP policies, which would reduce  this impact to less than cumulatively significant.   As discussed in the DSASP FEIR, the BAAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for  construction‐related GHG emissions. However, lead agencies are encouraged to quantify and  disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction. Using CalEEMod, it is estimated that  the project would generate approximately 401.9 metric tons of CO2e during construction of the  proposed project. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.4.‐1 would reduce GHG emissions  associated with waste and would reduce combustion‐related GHG emissions by reducing the  amount or type of fuel utilized at construction sites. The proposed project would not result in new  or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than analyzed in the DSASP FEIR and further  analysis is not required.  Operational Emissions  The DSASP FEIR analyzed the potential GHG emissions that would result from buildout of the DSASP.  The DSASP FEIR found that the DSASP would exceed the CAP thresholds of 3.58 metric tons of CO2e  per service population for 2020 and 3.08 metric tons of CO2e per service population for 2035.  Therefore, the DSASP identified Mitigation Measures MM4.4‐2 through MM4.4‐10 to ensure  compliance with CAP policies, which would reduce this impact to less than cumulatively significant.   Development of the proposed project would contribute to the significant GHG impacts identified in  the DSASP FEIR. As with the DSASP, long‐term operation of the proposed project would generate  GHG emissions from area and mobile sources, and indirect emissions from sources associated with  energy consumption. Mobile‐source emitters of GHGs would include project‐generated vehicle trips  associated with visitor trips to the project site. Area‐source emissions would be associated with  activities such as landscaping and maintenance on the project site, and other sources.   Following guidance from the BAAQMD, GHG emissions were estimated using CalEEMod. Table 9  shows the calculated GHG emissions for the proposed project. Motor vehicle emissions are the  largest source of GHG emissions for the project at approximately 73 percent of the total. Energy use  is the next largest category at 21 percent of CO2e emissions. Solid waste and water use are about 3  percent and 2 percent of the total emissions respectively. Area source emissions are approximately  1 percent of the total. Additional calculation details are included in Appendix A.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐33  Table 9: GHG Emissions (Metric Tons Per Year)  Emissions Source  Operational Emissions  CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent of  Total  Area Source Emissions 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.2 1  Energy Source Emissions 152.4 0.0 0.0 153.5 21  Mobile Source Emissions 524.3 0.0 0.0 524.8 73  Waste Source Emissions 9.9 0.6 0.0 24.6 3  Water Source Emissions 9.7 0.2 0.0 16.7 2  Total Annual Emissions 724.7 100  Per Service Population  2.5 ‐  Source: LSA (November 2018).     As shown in Table 9, project emissions would be below the CAP threshold of 3.58 metric tons of  CO2e per service population for 2020 and 3.08 metric tons of CO2e per service population for 2035.  Additionally, the proposed project would implement Mitigation Measures MM4.4‐2 through  MM4.4‐10, which require supporting expansion of public and private transit programs, reducing  dependence on autos through smart parking policies, expanding the use of alternative‐fuel vehicles,  reducing emissions from off‐road vehicles and equipment, maximizing energy efficiency, addressing  heat island issues and expanding the urban forest, promoting energy information sharing, and  reducing energy and water use. In compliance with these Mitigation Measures, the proposed  building would be made solar ready by providing infrastructure including electrical conduit. The  proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than  analyzed in the DSASP FEIR and further analysis is not required.  Conformance with Applicable Plans   The DSASP FEIR determined that the DSASP would be consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which  requires the State of California to reduce its GHG emission to 1990 levels by 2020, and the City’s CAP  as the mitigated GHG emissions associated with the DSASP would not exceed the CAP’s service  population thresholds.   Furthermore, as discussed in the DSASP FEIR, Senate Bill (SB) 375 requires that metropolitan  planning organizations (MPOs), like the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), that  provide regional transportation planning and financing for the San Francisco Bay Area, include  sustainable communities strategies for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions; aligning  planning for transportation and housing; and creating specified incentives for the implementation of  the strategies. SB 375 targets require a 7 to 8 percent reduction by 2020, and a 13 to 16 percent  reduction by 2035 for each MPO. As discussed in the DSASP FEIR, while the proposed DSASP is not  specifically subject to reduction requirements under SB 375, vehicle‐miles of travel generated under  the DSASP could further or hinder the region's ability to achieve the SB 37 5 targets. With the  implementation of the DSASP design features and Mitigation Measures MM4.4‐2, MM4.4‐3, and  MM4.4‐4, the DSASP FEIR determined that traffic within the DSASP is anticipated to be reduced by  between 14 and 34 percent. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR determined that implementation of the  DSASP would further the goals of both the AB 32 and SB 375 legislative initiatives. With    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐34  implementation of Mitigation Measures MM4.4‐1 through MM4.4‐10, this impact would be reduced  to less than cumulatively significant.   The proposed project adheres to the DSASP, and with implementation of Mitigation Measures  MM4.4‐1 through MM4.4‐10, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts  related to GHG emissions than analyzed in the DSASP FEIR; thus, further analysis is not required.  Applicable Mitigation  The proposed project could have potentially significant impacts related to greenhouse gas  emissions. Implementation of the below mitigation measures from the DSASP FEIR would ensure  that construction of the proposed project would result in a less‐than‐significant impact. No new  mitigation measures would be required.   MM4.4‐1 All construction projects shall incorporate, to the greatest extent feasible, the most  recent Best Management Practices for Greenhouse Gas Emissions as indicated by the BAAQMD.  Best Management Practices to reduce GHG emissions during construction may include, but are  not limited to:  ○ Use of alternative‐fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles/equipment of at least  15 percent of the fleet;  ○ Using local building materials of at least 10 percent; and  ○ Recycle at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials.   MM4.4‐2 Support Expansion of Public and Private Transit Programs to Reduce Employee  Commutes (1.2). Employers within the study area shall subscribe to the South San Francisco TDM  Ordinance such that a minimum of 25 percent of all employees are included. The South San  Francisco TDM Ordinance requires that all nonresidential developments producing 100 average  trips per day or more meet a 28 percent nondrive‐alone peak hour requirement with fees  assessed for noncompliance.   MM4.4‐3 Reduce Dependence on Autos through Smart Parking Policies (1.3). This measure  would implement Smart Parking Policies, such as shared parking, to reduce available parking by  10 percent.   MM4.4‐4 Expand the Use of Alternative‐Fuel Vehicles (2.1). Nonresidential and residential land  uses can encourage the use of alternative‐fueled vehicles by providing charging stations. In  support of this measure, development within the study area shall ensure that a minimum of 60  electric vehicle chargers are installed within nonresidential land uses and within the residential  units electric charging capabilities are available for a minimum of 200 vehicles.   MM4.4‐5 Reduce Emissions from Off‐Road Vehicles and Equipment (2.2). In support of this  measure, development within the study area shall ensure that a minimum of 25 percent of all  lawnmowers and leaf blowers acquired/used within the study area would be electric. This  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐35  requires that there be sufficient electrical outlets outside of all residential and nonresidential  units to encourage the use of non‐gas‐fueled lawn maintenance equipment.   MM4.4‐6 Maximize Energy Efficiency in the Built Environment through Standards and the Plan  Review Process (3.1). All new development within the study area shall, at a minimum, comply  with the CALGreen Tier 1 standards and exceed 2013 Title 24 by a minimum of 10 percent.   MM4.4‐7 Address Heat Island Issues and Expand the Urban Forest (3.4). At a minimum, 322,000  square feet of all new nonresidential development and 75 new residential units shall address  heat island effect issues by using high albedo surfaces and technologies identified in the  voluntary CALGreen Standards. This is in addition to the requirements of all new development to  plant trees in accordance with Zoning Code Chapter 13.30 with placement used to maximize  building shading.   MM4.4‐8 Promote Energy Information Sharing and Educate the Community about Energy‐ Efficient Behaviors and Construction (3.5). Develop as part of the Specific Plan an educational  information packet that will be distributed to residential and nonresidential land owners. These  information packets shall detail potential behavioral changes that can be instituted to save  energy, such as unplugging appliances, airdrying clothes, and daylighting strategies.   MM4.4‐9 Energy Reduction (4.1). In addition to complying with MM4.4‐6, the development  within the study area shall include the use of solar panels such that a minimum of 35,000 square  feet of nonresidential land use roof space is converted to solar panels, 205 residential units are  equipped with solar hot water heaters, and the electricity of an additional 75 dwelling units is  offset by solar panel arrays associated with the new residential development.   MM4.4‐10 Water Reduction (6.1). Nonresidential and residential land uses shall reduce per  capita water consumption by 40 gallons per day. Measures to be implemented to reduce water  consumption may include, but are not limited to:  ○ Limiting turf area in commercial and multi‐family projects  ○ Restricting hours of irrigation to between 3:00 AM and 2 hours after sunrise (suggestion to  be included  ○ in the energy information saving package)  ○ Installing irrigation controllers with rain sensors  ○ Landscaping with native, water‐efficient plants  ○ Installing drip irrigation systems  ○ Reducing impervious surfaces  ○ Installing high‐efficiency, water‐saving appliances    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐36  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 7.3‐G‐2: Mitigate the community of South San Francisco’s impact on climate change by  reducing greenhouse gas emissions consistent with state guidance.   Policy7.3‐G‐3: Reduce energy use in the built environment.   Policy 7.3‐I‐2: Use the City’s development review process and the California Environmental  Quality Act (CEQA) regulations to evaluate and mitigate the local and cumulative effects of new  development on air quality and GHG emissions.     Policy 7.3‐I‐7: Adopt and implement the City of South San Francisco’s CAP, which will identify a  GHG emissions reduction target and measures and actions to achieve the reduction target.   Policy 7.3‐I‐8: Evaluate and regularly report to City Council, or its designee, on the  implementation status of the CAP and update the CAP as necessary should the City find that  adopted strategies are not achieving anticipated reductions, or to otherwise incorporate new  opportunities.   Policy 7.3‐I‐10: Facilitate energy efficiency in building regulations and streamlined review  processes, providing flexibility to achieve specified energy performance levels and requiring  energy efficiency measures as appropriate.   As noted above, the proposed project would comply with DSASP Mitigation Measures 4.4‐1 through  4.4‐10, which require various energy‐ and emissions‐reducing features. In addition, the proposed  project would comply with the City’s CAP, BAAQMD’s Clean Air Plan, and various State laws related  to GHGs. Therefore, the proposed project would further the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions  resulting from the proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and  additional mitigation is not required.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐37  8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment  through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous  materials?        b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment  through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident  conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into  the environment?        c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely  hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one‐ quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?        d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous  materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code  Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a  significant hazard to the public or the environment?        e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,  where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a  public airport or public use airport, would the project result  in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the  project area?        f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would  the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or  working in the project area?        g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an  adopted emergency response plan or emergency  evacuation plan?        h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,  injury or death involving wildland fires, including where  wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where  residences are intermixed with wildlands?          Discussion  Transport, Use, Storage, and Disposal of Hazardous Materials  The proposed project would include the demolition of the existing structures on the project site and  construction of a new residential apartment building. The proposed land use would not involve  transport, use, or disposal of significant quantities of hazardous materials. Generally, small  quantities of hazardous materials such as paints and cleaning products would be used for  maintenance. The DSASP FEIR concluded that while some hazardous substances may be generated,  stored, transported, used, or disposed of in association with residential and non‐residential  development projects Downtown (e.g., cleaning supplies), existing local, State, and federal  regulations and oversight would reduce potential impacts to a less‐than‐significant level. Therefore,    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐38  the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those previously  analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.  Release of Hazardous Materials and Emission of Hazardous Materials within 0.25 miles of a School  The proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment  through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous  materials into the environment. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared for the  proposed project did not identify any potentially hazardous materials that would be released  through construction or operation of the proposed project.10 The Phase I ESA did recommend a  limited subsurface investigation in order to determine whether an unidentified Underground  Storage Tank (UST) is present at the site. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation prepared for  the proposed project did not find any evidence of the presence of a UST.  No manufacturing or industrial processes that utilize or produce dangerous substances are proposed  as part of the project. The DSASP FEIR concluded that compliance with mandatory local, State, and  federal regulations would ensure that the risk to the public or the environment from upset and  accident conditions would be less‐than‐significant. Additionally, the nearest school, Spruce  Elementary School, is located 0.7 mile northwest, which is further than 0.5 mile from the project  site. Therefore, because the proposed project would comply with all federal, State, and local  regulations, there would be no new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the  DSASP FEIR related to the release of hazardous materials.  Hazardous Materials Site Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5  There are several open and closed hazardous materials sites in the DSASP Plan Area listed on the  State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) Geotracker database. The majority of  cases involve leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) and solvents and dry cleaning chemicals.  The proposed project is not located on a site included on a list of hazardous materials site compiled  by the State Water Board. As noted in the City’s General Plan the location of existing hazardous  materials cases near future proposed development would be identified during the development  approval process.11 The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable  regulations for remediation of hazards, such as compliance with appropriate guidelines of the  regional Underground Storage Tank Program. Therefore, because the proposed project would  comply with existing regulations, there would be no new or more severe impacts than those  previously identified in the DSASP FEIR related to hazardous materials sites.  Aviation Hazards  The project site is located approximately one mile north of the San Francisco International Airport  (SFIA). The DSASP Plan Area is located outside of all SFIA Safety Compatibility Zones. However, the  DSASP Plan Area is located within Airport Influence Area B and is subject to Federal Aviation  Administration (FAA) notification requirements. The maximum building height allowed in the DSASP                                                               10  Partner Engineering and Science, 2018. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for the Borba  Property at 200‐214 Airport Boulevard, South San Francisco, California 94080. May 11.  11  South San Francisco, City of, 1999. City of South San Francisco General Plan.   ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐39  Plan Area would be 120 feet, which is below the lowest obstruction standard for the DSASP Plan  Area of 163.2 feet. The DSASP and DSASP FEIR were review by the City and County Association of  Governments (C/CAG) and determined to be compatible with the Comprehensive Airport Land Use  Plan for SFIA. The proposed project would be less than 100 feet tall and therefore would not be  required to file notification with the FAA prior to the start of construction. There are no private  airstrips within two miles of the DSASP Plan Area. Therefore, because the proposed project would  be consistent with the type and intensity of development assumed in the DSASP, there would be no  new or more severe impacts than those previously identified in the DSASP FEIR related to airport  hazards.  Emergency Response or Evacuation Plans  Construction activities associated with the proposed project could potentially affect emergency  response or evacuation plans due to temporary construction barricades or other obstructions that  could impede emergency access on site. The South San Francisco Municipal Code prohibits road  closures or obstructions without approval by the chief of police. Therefore, because the proposed  project would comply with all existing regulations regarding emergency access, there would be no  new or more severe impacts than those previously identified in the DSASP FEIR related to  emergency access.  Wildfire Hazards  The project site is located in an urban environment and is not adjacent to wildlands and therefore  would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland  fires. Therefore, there would be no new or more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in  the DSASP FEIR related to wildfire hazards.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts of the  proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional  mitigation is not required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐40  9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge  requirements?       b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere  substantially with groundwater recharge such that there  would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the  local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of  pre‐existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would  not support existing land uses or planned uses for which  permits have been granted)?       c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site  or area, including through the alteration of the course of a  stream or river, in a manner which would result in  substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site?        d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site  or area, including through the alteration of the course of a  stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount  of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding  on‐ or off‐site?        e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the  capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage  systems or provide substantial additional sources of  polluted runoff?        f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?       g. Place housing within a 100‐year flood hazard area as  mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood  Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?       h. Place within a 100‐year flood hazard area structures which  would impede or redirect flood flows?       i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,  injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a  result of the failure of a levee or dam?        j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?        Discussion  Water and Wastewater Quality Standards, Water Supply, and Drainage Patterns  To comply with the Clean Water Act (CWA), San Mateo County and the twenty cities and towns in  the County, including the City of South San Francisco, formed the San Mateo Countywide  Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP). STOPPP holds a joint municipal NPDES permit  from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board). The  permit includes a comprehensive plan to reduce the discharge of pollutants to creeks, San Francisco  Bay, and the ocean to the maximum extent possible. The San Mateo Countywide STOPPP has a Site  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐41  Design Standards Checklist to evaluate proposed projects against guidelines intended to reduce  stormwater pollution; this checklist will be completed and required by the Water Quality Division  and is included as a condition of approval. Construction activities would continue to be required to  comply with the NPDES general permit for construction activities, pursuant to which BMPs would be  implemented to control stormwater during construction, including silt fences, watering for dust  control, straw bale check dams, hydroseeding, and other measures.  Colma Creek is the City’s main natural drainage system. A small area along the southern boundary of  the DSASP Plan Area is adjacent to Colma Creek; however, Colma Creek does not intersect the  DSASP Plan Area at any point and future development, including the proposed project, would not  alter the course of Colma Creek or any other waterway. Surface and stormwater runoff from the  DSASP Plan Area is collected by the City’s storm drainage system. The existing storm drainage  system in the project area is designed to accommodate flows from urbanized development and  takes into account the high ratio of impervious surfaces in the area. The proposed project would  result in the removal of existing buildings on the site and redevelopment of the area with residential  uses. The ratio of impervious surface area would be similar to existing conditions, thereby not  increasing runoff or stormwater flows over existing conditions. During construction, erosion and  run‐off would be controlled through required compliance with the NPDES general permit for  construction activities, including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).  Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of  development assumed in the DSASP and would comply with existing regulations, there would be no  new or more severe impacts than were previously identified in the DSASP FEIR related to water and  wastewater regulations and drainage patterns.  Surface Runoff  Redevelopment of the project site would require new drainage structures and localized on‐site  storm drain systems. The proposed project would include a new storm drain system to  accommodate anticipated runoff, the size of which would be directed by the City’s Engineering  division during the building permit process. The proposed project would either self‐treat within  landscaped areas on the third floor courtyard or drain through the site to a bubbler catch basin that  would connect to existing stormwater infrastructure.  The San Mateo Countywide STOPPP includes the Site Design Standards Checklist to evaluate  proposed projects against guidelines intended to reduce stormwater pollution. The proposed  project would be required to conform with the Site Design Standards and all applicable regulations  pertaining to water quality. Therefore, because the proposed project would install new storm drain  systems and comply with existing regulations, there would be no new or more severe impacts than  those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to surface runoff.  Surface Runoff Water Quality  With implementation of the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  as part of the NPDES permit program, the proposed project would not result in degradation of  existing water quality. Additionally, operation of the proposed project would not generate any    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐42  foreseen uses that would substantially degrade water quality. As noted above, the proposed project  would either self‐treat stormwater or drain it through a bubbler catch basin that would connect to  existing stormwater infrastructure. Therefore, because the proposed project would implement the  Countywide SWPPP as a part of the NPDES permit program, there would be no new or more severe  impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the DSASP related to surface runoff water quality.  Flooding and Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow  The project site is not located within the 100‐year flood hazard area,12 nor is it located within a dam  failure inundation area.13 The DSASP FEIR found that a 1.5‐million‐gallon storage reservoir located  on the top of San Bruno Hill poses the greatest risk of seiche hazards in the DSASP Plan Area.  However, because the reservoir holds a relatively small volume of water, water released during a  seiche would be largely absorbed in the vegetated hillsides. Additionally, because the hillsides of San  Bruno Mountain are rolling as opposed to steep, the flow of water would not be rapid. Therefore,  seiche inundation impacts would be less than significant in the project area.   The project site is not located within a mapped tsunami inundation area.14 The DSASP FEIR  concluded that the potential for inundation by mudflow is considered low due to a lack of steep  slopes in the area and because the hillsides surrounding the DSASP Plan Area are covered by  development and landscaping. Rainfall onto these areas would encounter vegetation or impervious  surfaces, and would not pose a risk of causing saturated soil to loosen and flow downhill.  Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to flooding and inundation.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 7.2‐G‐1: Comply with the San Francisco Bay RWQCB regulations and standards to  maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources.   Policy 7.2‐G‐2: Enhance the quality of surface water resources and prevent their contamination.                                                               12  Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012. Flood Rate Insurance Map No. 06081C0043E. October 16.  13  California Department of Water Resources, 2018. Dam Inundation Maps. Website: water.ca.gov/ Programs/All‐Programs/Division‐of‐Safety‐of‐Dams/Inundation‐Maps (accessed November 9, 2018).  14  California Emergency Management Agency, 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning  (map). June 15.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐43   Policy 8.2‐I‐2: Use the City’s development review process to ensure that proposed development  subject to the 100‐year flood provides adequate protection from flood hazards, in areas  identified in Figure 8‐3.  The proposed project would comply with all applicable RWQCB regulations, would include water  quality treatment areas within the project site, and would not be located within any flood hazard  areas, and would therefore further the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential hydrology and water quality impacts of the  proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional  mitigation is not required.  10. LAND USE AND PLANNING    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Physically divide an established community?       b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or  regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project  (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,  local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the  purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?        c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or  natural community conservation plan?         Discussion  Divide an Established Community  Projects that have the potential to physically divide an established community include projects such  as new freeways and highways, major arterials, streets, and railroad lines. The proposed project  would develop a new seven‐story mixed‐use building on the project site within the DSASP Plan Area  that currently contains commercial buildings and surface parking. The proposed project would  provide public access by including public sidewalks throughout the project site that connect with the  existing sidewalks along Airport Boulevard and the future pedestrian plaza north of the project site.  Bicycle and vehicle access would be provided via Airport Boulevard as well. Therefore, the proposed  project would not inhibit public connectivity, and would not physically divide a community.  Therefore, there would be no new or more severe impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the  DSASP FEIR related to the division of an established community.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐44  Conformance with Land Use Plans  The proposed project complies with all applicable standards, guidelines, and regulations set forth in  the DSASP, and therefore would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation.  The project applicant will be requesting a Conditional Use Permit for construction of multi‐family  residential development, consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance. As noted in Attachment A,  Project Description, the City’s zoning ordinance allows for a maximum of 180 dwelling units per acre  within the DTC district with the inclusion of public benefits.15 Therefore, a maximum of 99 units  would be allowed on the project site with the inclusion of public benefits that are subject to  approval by the City Council. The proposed project would include 94 units, and therefore would be  consistent with the DSASP development standards set forth in Section 20.280.004 of the City’s  Zoning Ordinance.  The DSASP would yield significant amounts of new residential and employment uses in the DSASP  Plan Area, where development potential would be determined by applying the land use, density and  intensity assumptions to land within each district. For the purposes of assessing environmental  impacts associated with the plan, it has been assumed that only 25 percent of parcels in the DSASP  Plan Area would be developed within the plan’s 20‐year timeframe. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR  assumed the addition of 1,435 units of residential uses to the existing 1,426 units in the area, for a  total of 2,861 residential units in the proximity of the Caltrain station. Additionally, the DSASP FEIR  analyzed the addition of a maximum of 1.2 million square feet of new office/R&D uses, which  represents as many as 2,400 or more jobs added to the City. The proposed project includes 94 new  residential units, which would bring the cumulative total to approximately 1,054 total new  residential units within the DSASP Plan Area since adoption in January 2015. Therefore, because the  proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of development assumed for the  project site within the DSASP, there would be no new or more severe impacts than those previously  analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to conformance with land use plans.  Habitat Conservation Plan  There is no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Communities Conservation Plan, or other  approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan that is applicable to the DSASP Plan  Area. Therefore, there would be no new or more serve impacts beyond those previously analyzed in  the DSASP FEIR.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.                                                               15  South San Francisco, City of, 2018. Ordinance 1553‐2018. March 28.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐45  Applicable Policies  DSASP Policies   Policy LU‐2: Encourage a mix of uses, activities, and amenities throughout the Downtown to  assist in revitalization of the Downtown as a citywide and regional destination.   Policy LU‐3: Require ground level retail or other active ground floor uses in future development  along Grand Avenue and on key intersecting streets—Linden, Cypress and Maple Avenues—to  ensure activity and vitality in the Downtown.   Policy LU‐4: Establish the highest intensity land uses within ¼‐mile of the Caltrain station. Here,  densities up to 120 dwelling units per acre will be encouraged.   Policy LU‐8: Encourage a mix of housing types including ownership, rental, family and senior  housing, and also encourage provision of units accessible to persons with disabilities.  As noted above, the proposed project would consist of a seven‐story mixed‐use residential building  with ground level retail and rental housing within 0.25‐mile of the Caltrain station, and would  therefore further the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential land use impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.  11. MINERAL RESOURCES    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource  that would be of value to the region and the residents of  the state?        b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally‐important  mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general  plan, specific plan or other land use plan?          Discussion  There are no significant mineral deposits identified within the DSASP Plan Area. The project site  does not contain valuable or locally important mineral resources and implementation of the  proposed project would not result in the consumption of extraordinary amounts of mineral  resources. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity  of development assumed for the project site by the DSASP, there would be no new or more severe  impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to mineral resources.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐46  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus,  no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the impacts to mineral resources. Therefore, potential  impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.  12. NOISE    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project result in:      a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in  excess of standards established in the local general plan or  noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?        b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive  groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?       c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in  the project vicinity above levels existing without the  project?        d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient  noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing  without the project?        e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,  where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a  public airport or public use airport, would the project  expose people residing or working in the project area to  excessive noise levels?       f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would  the project expose people residing or working in the project  area to excessive noise levels?          Discussion  Noise is usually defined as unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that may produce  physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with communication, work, rest, recreation,  or sleep. Several noise measurement scales exist that are used to describe noise in a particular  location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement that indicates the relative intensity of a sound.  Sound levels in dB are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 dB represents a 10‐fold  increase in acoustic energy, while 20 dB is 100 times more intense and 30 dB is 1,000 times more  intense. Each 10 dB increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness;  and similarly, each 10 dB decrease in sound level is perceived as half as loud. Sound intensity is  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐47  normally measured through the A‐weighted sound level (dBA). This scale gives greater weight to the  frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. The A‐weighted sound level is the  basis for 24‐hour sound measurements that better represent human sensitivity to sound at night.   As noise spreads from a source, it loses energy so that the farther away the recipient is from the  noise source, the lower the perceived noise level would be. Geometric spreading causes the sound  level to attenuate or be reduced, resulting in a 6 dB reduction in the noise level for each doubling of  distance from a single point source of noise to the noise sensitive receptor of concern.   There are many ways to rate noise for various time periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient  noise affecting humans also accounts for the annoying effects of sound. Equivalent continuous  sound level (Leq) is the total sound energy of time varying noise over a sample period. However, the  predominant rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the Leq, the  community noise equivalent level (CNEL), and the day‐night average level (Ldn) based on A‐weighted  decibels (dBA). CNEL is the time varying noise over a 24‐hour period, with a 5 dBA weighting factor  applied to the hourly Leq for noises occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (defined as relaxation  hours) and 10 dBA weighting factor applied to noise occurring from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (defined  as sleeping hours). Ldn is similar to the CNEL scale, but without the adjustment for events occurring  during the evening relaxation hours. CNEL and Ldn are within one dBA of each other and are normally  exchangeable. The noise adjustments are added to the noise events occurring during the more  sensitive hours.  A project would have a significant noise effect if it would substantially increase the ambient noise  levels for adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of applicable  regulatory agencies, including, as appropriate, the City of South San Francisco.  Certain land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others. Examples of these include  residential areas, educational facilities, hospitals, childcare facilities, and senior housing. Land uses  in the immediate area of the project site are comprised of a mix of commercial, light industrial,  research and development, and residential uses. The closest existing residential land uses are  located approximately 120 feet west of the project site across Airport Boulevard. In addition, a  residential building is currently under construction adjacent to the southern border of the project  site. The project site itself is currently developed with five commercial buildings and associated  surface parking spaces, which would be demolished as part of the proposed project.   Figure 9‐2 of the General Plan Noise Element depicts future noise levels in the City associated with  traffic noise, railroad noise, industrial noise, and BART extension noise. Based on Figure 9‐2 of the  General Plan Noise Element, noise levels on the project site are approximately 65 to 70 dBA CNEL.  Traffic on US 101 is the primary noise source affecting the existing ambient noise levels in the  project vicinity. Other noise in the project vicinity includes traffic on Airport Way, airplanes flying  overhead, and the Union Pacific Railroad line.  In addition, Table 4.6‐3 of the DSASP FEIR identifies roadway noise level contours for existing traffic  volumes on US 101. As shown in Table 4.6‐3, areas within 0.16 mile or 845 feet from the centerline  of US 101 between Produce Avenue/Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue would be exposed to    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐48  noise levels reaching 70 dBA CNEL. The project site is located approximately 120 feet from the  centerline of US 101. Therefore, the proposed project would be exposed to noise levels reaching 70  dBA CNEL.  Land Use Compatibility  The City sets forth noise level standards for land use compatibility and interior noise exposure of  new development. According to the City’s General Plan, noise levels below 65 dBA CNEL are  considered satisfactory for residential land uses and do not require special insulation requirements.  Noise levels between 65 and 70 dBA CNEL require an analysis of noise reduction requirements and  noise insulation as needed. For areas with noise levels over 70 dBA CNEL, residential land use  development should not be undertaken. The interior noise level standard for residential land uses is  45 dBA CNEL. In addition, noise levels below 70 dBA CNEL are considered satisfactory for  commercial land uses and do not require special insulation requirements. Noise levels between 70  and 80 dBA CNEL require an analysis of noise reduction requirements and noise insulation as  needed. For areas with noise levels over 80 dBA CNEL, commercial land use development should not  be undertaken.  As discussed above, the dominant source of noise in the project vicinity is associated with vehicle  traffic noise on US 101. With the incorporation of noise modeling information taken from the  appendices of the DSASP FEIR along with updated data from Caltrans, noise levels at the nearest  façade of the project site associated with traffic noise from US 101 are approximately 81 dBA CNEL.  The results of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) model are included in the Noise Impact  Analysis16 prepared for the proposed project, which is available in Appendix D. According to the  City’s land use compatibility standards, for residential land uses, special noise insulation should be  provided in order to meet interior noise levels. In addition, for residential land uses, development  should generally not be undertaken in areas with such noise levels because feasible mitigation is  usually not available to ensure compliance with the General Plan. Therefore, the land use may be  permitted only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction features proposed to be incorporated  in the project design. A preliminary interior and exterior noise analysis is provided below.  Interior Noise Analysis. In order to comply with the City of South San Francisco interior noise level  requirement of 45 dBA CNEL, an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 36 dBA would be  required. The rating of the wall and window or windows within the assembly will have a rating often  referred to as a Sound Transmission Class or STC rating. The following recommendations are based  on broad assumptions for typical multi‐family residential uses. The recommendations should be  considered preliminary and confirmed upon final plan approval.  Based on typical stucco construction along with standard windows, an approximate 25‐28 dBA  exterior to interior noise reduction could be achieved. These assumptions assume a wall rating of  STC‐4617 and window rating of STC‐25.18 In order to reduce noise,  one or more of the following                                                               16  LSA Associates, Inc., 2019. Noise Impact Analysis for 200 Airport Boulevard. January.  17  Harris, C.M., 1998. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control.  18  Milgard. 2008. Sound Transmission Loss Test Report No. TL08‐149. February.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐49  design options would need to be implemented and confirmed in a Final Acoustical Report, which  would be conducted and approved by the City prior to building plan approval as described below.   Exterior wall upgrades may be necessary with a higher STC rating than typical construction. For  example, an upgraded wall with an STC rating of 50 would consist of 2 inch by 4 inch wood studs with  one layer of 5/8 inch Type “X” gypsum board on each side of resilient channels on 24‐inch centers  and 3.5‐inch fiberglass insulation.19   Upgraded windows are likely necessary as well. Windows with an increased STC rating would be  necessary to increase the composite reduction of the building façade. Most major window companies  sell windows specifically designed for loud exterior conditions. In order to achieve the expected  reductions, windows would need to remain closed to achieve the necessary noise reduction, so a  form of mechanical ventilation would be required; however, the project would include an HVAC  system as part of the project features so no additional ventilation system would be required beyond  what is already proposed.   Modification of the ratio of glass‐to‐wall may also be necessary. A façade with a large percentage of  glass is likely to have trouble reaching desired reduction requirement in a noisy environment.   In order to calculate and estimate the noise reduction provided by an exterior wall assembly, the  transmission loss at the octave band frequencies for wall material by type is combined to provide an  overall noise reduction. This analysis would be contained within the Final Acoustical Report and  would incorporate the specific wall composition and window details included in the architectural  plans.   The potential for individual development projects to result in the exposure of noise levels in excess  of the City’s standards was identified as a potentially significant impact in the DSAP EIR (Impact 4.6‐ 1). Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐3 in the DSASP FEIR requires individual development projects to  perform a site‐specific acoustical analysis to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. In  compliance with this requirement, a Noise Impact Analysis, included in Appendix D, was prepared  for the proposed project. Based on the analysis and recommendations included in the Noise Impact  Analysis, implementation of the following Project‐Specific Condition of Approval would provide  sufficient noise reduction resulting in acceptable interior noise levels of 45 CNEL or lower.   Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3: In compliance with the requirements of DSASP  Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐3, the project applicant shall implement the following measures, or  similar combination of measures, which demonstrate that interior noise levels would be  reduced to an acceptable level of 45 dBA CNEL or lower:   In order for windows and doors to remain closed, mechanical ventilation such as air  conditioning shall be provided for all units.                                                               19  CertainTeed, 2003. Noise Control in Buildings. Guidelines for Acoustical Problem Solving. October.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐50   All vent ducts connecting interior spaces to the exterior (i.e., bathroom exhaust, etc.) shall  have at least two 90 degree turns in the duct.    All windows and doors shall be installed in an acoustically‐effective manner. Sliding‐window  panels shall form an air‐tight seal when in the closed position and the window frames shall  be caulked to the wall opening around the perimeter with a non‐hardening caulking  compound to prevent sound infiltration. Exterior doors shall seal air‐tight around the full  perimeter when in the closed position.    A Final Acoustical Report shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit to  determine all the minimum STC ratings for the walls, windows, and doors to be provided to  the City for review. This report shall be completed by a qualified acoustical consultant to  ensure that the selected windows and doors in combination with wall assemblies would  reduce interior noise levels sufficiently to meet the City’s interior noise standard for  residential uses.  With implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3, interior noise levels would meet  the City’s interior noise standard.   Exterior Noise Analysis. As identified above, noise levels on the project site would be up to 81 dBA  CNEL. Based on the City’s noise and land use compatibility standards, for commercial land uses,  special noise insulation should be provided. Therefore, the land use may be permitted only after  detailed analysis of the noise reduction features proposed to be incorporated in the project design.  The existing on‐site noise level would meet the City’s exterior noise level standards if noise  reduction requirements and noise insulation features are included in the design to meet the interior  noise standard. As discussed above, with implementation of Project‐Specific Standard Condition 3,  interior noise levels would meet the City’s interior noise standard; therefore, the existing on‐site  noise level would meet the City’s exterior noise level standards.  The proposed project would include common open outdoor space. This would include private  balconies for individual units, a 3,157‐square‐foot courtyard on the third story, and a 1,273‐square‐ foot roof deck on the seventh story. The units facing US 101 would not have private balconies.   The third floor courtyard would be located along the western portion of the project site, adjacent to  Airport Boulevard, and would be completely shielded from US 101. Therefore, it is expected that  that noise levels from Airport Boulevard would be the dominant source and have the potential to  approach 71 dBA CNEL. Taking into account the elevation change from Airport Boulevard to the  courtyard, reduction of angle‐of‐view provided by the building design, and the proposed glass  barrier along the edge of the courtyard, it is expected that noise levels at the courtyard would be  reduced to below 65 dBA CNEL.  The seventh floor roof deck would located on the northwest corner of the project site. A majority of  this deck would have a partially reduced, but direct line‐of‐site to US 101. With the incorporation of  the reduction provided by the building itself and the increased distance from US 101, noise levels  would be approximately 76 dBA CNEL. While design options of the roof deck could be considered, it  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐51  is likely infeasible to provide a reduction of 11 dBA or more. However, as noted above, with  implementation of Project‐Specific Standard Condition 3, interior noise levels would meet the City’s  interior noise standard; therefore, the existing on‐site noise level would meet the City’s exterior  noise level standards.  Construction‐Period Impacts  As described in the Initial Study for the DSASP (Appendix A to the DSASP FEIR), construction of  future development associated with the DSASP would result in temporary increases in noise levels  associated with operation of construction equipment. Construction of land uses accommodated by  the DSASP would not take place all at once, and would be spread throughout the study area so that  limited receptors would be exposed to construction noise at any given time. Under SSFMC Section  8.32.050(d), construction activities are limited to between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on  weekdays, 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and  holidays, or as authorized by the construction permit. Construction noise that occurs during these  hours is exempt from the noise level limits established in the City's Noise Ordinance because these  hours are outside of the recognized sleep hours for residents and outside of evening and early  morning hours and time periods where residents are most sensitive to exterior noise. Consequently,  the City permits construction noise during these hours as long as the noise levels do not exceed 90  dB. The DSASP FEIR determined that because future construction under the DSASP would be  required to comply with all applicable City ordinances, including limits on construction hour, impacts  related to construction noise would be less than significant.  Short‐term noise generated by the approximately 25‐month construction period would temporarily  increase noise levels in the vicinity of the project site. However, the proposed project would not  result in any new or more significant construction‐period noise impacts than were described in the  DSASP FEIR. Implementation of the City’s Noise Ordinance and the DSASP, as included in the DSASP  FEIR, would reduce construction noise impacts to a less‐than‐significant level.  Operational Noise Source Impacts  As described in the DSASP FEIR, development intensity would increase with DSASP implementation,  specifically transit‐oriented mixed‐use development. The DSASP seeks to create a pedestrian‐,  bicycle‐, and transit‐friendly environment that would result in the placement of residential  development in close proximity to commercial land uses. Therefore, the DSASP FEIR determined  that noise levels would have the potential to increase in the DSASP Plan Area.  The DSASP FEIR determined that new commercial development would have the potential to expose  existing noise‐sensitive land uses to noise levels that exceeds the City’s 65 dBA noise limit for  residences. As discussed in the DSASP, noise sources from commercial use include delivery truck  loading and unloading, parking lot noise, and mechanical equipment (HVAC units). Parking lots could  also generate noise levels that exceed noise level limits from vehicle horns and/or car alarms,  depending on the distance to sensitive receptors. However, as determined in the DSASP, noise  exposure from parking lots would be intermittent and would not occur at the same time and  location so that the overall effects would be separate and would not adversely affect noise‐sensitive  receptors.      200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐52  The DSASP FEIR also determined that commercial land uses could generate noise levels from HVAC  systems and other equipment that exceeds the exterior and interior residential and commercial  noise limits. The DSASP identified that HVAC equipment installed under future development  associated with the DSASP could generate noise levels that average between 57 to 72 dBA CNEL at  50 feet if equipment is operating unshielded and constantly over 24 hours. At these unscreened  levels, the HVAC equipment would be anticipated to exceed the City’s noise limits for residential and  commercial land uses and would result in potentially significant impacts. However, the DSASP  identified Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐1 to reduce HVAC mechanical equipment to a less‐than‐ significant level. Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐1 requires individual projects to demonstrate that the  noise level from operation of mechanical equipment would not exceed the exterior noise level limits  for a designated receiving land use category as specified in Noise Ordinance Section 8.32.030.  The Noise Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project evaluated potential noise impacts  associated with HVAC equipment. The closest existing residential land uses are located  approximately 120 feet west of the project site across Airport Boulevard. In addition, a residential  building is currently under construction approximately 50 feet south of the project site. The  proposed project would include rooftop mechanical equipment, including the HVAC system, which  would be enclosed with an up to 42‐inch‐ tall screen wall, approximately 120 feet from the  residential building south of the project site. Therefore, based on a reduction in noise of 6 dBA per  doubling of distance, at 100 feet, HVAC noise would be approximately 42 to 57 dBA Leq and  approximately 49 to 64 dBA CNEL. In addition, as noted above, the mechanical equipment would be  located on the roof and would be enclosed with an up to 42‐inch‐tall screen wall, which would  reduce noise levels by approximately 8 dBA. Therefore, mechanical noise would be approximately  34 to 49 dBA Leq and approximately 41 to 56 dBA CNEL at the nearest sensitive receptors. As  identified in Noise Ordinance Section 8.32.030, the City of South San Francisco sets noise standards  for residential land uses, which require that noise levels do not exceed 65 dBA Leq during the  daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) or 55 dBA Leq during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) at  multi‐family residential land uses. Therefore, noise levels associated with the project’s HVAC  equipment would be below the City’s noise level standards at the nearest sensitive receptor and  impacts would be less than significant.  Groundborne Vibration Impacts  The following is based on the vibration analysis, which was prepared pursuant to Mitigation  Measure MM4.6‐5 of the DSASP FEIR, for the proposed project, which is included in the Noise  Impact Analysis in Appendix D.  Construction Vibration Impacts. The DSASP determined that construction activities that would  occur under the DSASP would have the potential to generate low levels of groundborne vibration. As  discussed in the Noise Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project and as presented in Table  4.6‐7 of the DSASP FEIR, vibration levels could reach as high as approximately 87 V dB within 25 feet  of an active construction site. Construction within approximately 25 feet of existing sensitive uses  would exceed a vibration velocity level in decibels (VdB) threshold of 85 VdB. The DSASP determined  that with attenuation due to distance, construction activities occurring 30 feet or more away from  an active construction site would not exceed 85 V dB. The closest existing residential land uses are  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐53  located approximately 120 feet west of the project site across Airport Boulevard. In addition, a  residential building is currently under construction approximately 50 feet south of the project site.   Due to distance attenuation, the closest residences to the south would experience vibration levels of  up to 78 VdB (0.031 PPV [in/sec]). The closest residences to the west would experience vibration  levels of up to 69 VdB (0.011 PPV [in/sec]). These vibration levels at the closest residential structures  from construction equipment would not exceed the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) threshold  of 94 VdB (0.2 in/sec PPV) for building damage. These levels are also below the FTA’s “barely  perceptible” human response criteria of 0.04 PPV for transient sources of vibration events. In  addition, the DSASP FEIR requires the implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐4 to reduce  construction vibration impacts. With implementation of Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐4, impacts  would be less than significant.   Operational Vibration Impacts. As discussed in the DSASP FEIR, an existing additional potential  source of groundborne vibration is the freight and commuter rail line which bisects the DSASP Plan  Area. The FTA provides thresholds for land use categories that may be subject to vibration impacts  from a commuter railroad. For Category 1 uses (vibration‐sensitive equipment), the disturbance  criteria for frequent events is 65 VdB. For Category 2 land uses (residences and buildings where  people normally sleep), the disturbance criteria is 72 VdB. The screening distance for Category 3  land uses (institutional land uses) is 75 VdB. The proposed project would include Category 2 land  uses located approximately 65 feet from the rail line. The DSASP FEIR determined that the  commuter line would have the potential to exceed the FTA disturbance criteria for Category 2 uses  up to 70 feet from the rail line and the freight line would have the potential to exceed FTA  disturbances for Category 2 at up to 200 feet from the rail line.   Based on the DSASP FEIR, Caltrain runs 68 commuter trains each day through the rail line, and  Southern Pacific freight trains also use the line. According to the FTA guidelines, the suggested  maximum vibration criterion for “frequent events” (more than 70 train events per day) is 72 VdB at  residential land uses and for “occasional events” (between 30 and 70 vibration events of the same  source per day) the criterion is 75 VdB. According to the FTA, light rail vehicles result in groundborne  vibration of up to 85 VdB at less than 10 feet from the rail line and freight trains result in  groundborne vibration of 85 VdB at approximately 50 feet from the rail line. With the construction  of the proposed project, some reduction in vibration would occur due to a large building of “mass”  which would assist in dampening the vibration. However, the building façade that is closest to the  rail line would be exposed to vibration levels exceeding the 72 VdB threshold recommended for  residential uses from frequent events. Based on the FTA Manual, a 2 VdB reduction is assumed at  each floor above pad elevation. With the residential uses beginning on the third level, and applying  a 2 VdB reduction for each floor, the vibration levels at the upper floors would be lower than the  first floor.  The potential for individual development projects to exceed the FTA‐recommended threshold for  operational vibration was identified as a less than significant impact with mitigation in the DSASP  FEIR (Impact 4.6‐3). Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐5 would be applicable to the proposed project.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐54  Because groundborne vibration levels would exceed the FTA‐recommended threshold of 72 VdB at  on‐site building setback locations, Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4 would be required to  ensure that groundborne vibration levels would not exceed the FTA’s vibration impact criteria.  Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4: In compliance with DSASP Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐ 5, at the time of building permit submittal, the project applicant shall submit a site specific  vibration analysis to confirm what, if any, vibration design mitigation measures have been  implemented into the building design to ensure vibration levels are reduced to less than 72 VdB.  The report shall be submitted to the City for review as part of the building permit submittal  package. If necessary, methods to reduce vibration may include, but are not limited to, the use  of elastomer pads to support the building foundation, deeper joists, shorter floor spans, and/or  lally columns. Proposed building structures should be designed to minimize vibration  amplification at the upper floors.   With implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4, groundborne vibration levels  would not exceed the FTA’s vibration impact criteria and impacts would be less than significant.  Aircraft Noise Source Impacts  According to the City’s current and projected noise contours for San Francisco International Airport,  the project site is not within an area exposed to aircraft noise levels greater than 65 dBA CNEL.  Therefore, per DSASP FEIR analysis, aircraft noise would have no impact on the project site.  Traffic Noise Impacts  The DSASP FEIR determined that DSASP‐related traffic would result in an increase in noise levels of  up to 3 dBA in the DSASP Plan Area, resulting in a significant increase in traffic noise levels. The  DSASP FEIR also determined that there are no feasible mitigation measures available to reduce  roadway noise and that impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Although the proposed  project would result in an increase in traffic noise levels over existing conditions on the street  network in its vicinity, it would not result in any additional or more severe noise impacts than were  addressed in the DSASP FEIR.  Applicable Mitigation  Implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3, which is consistent with Mitigation  Measure MM4.6‐3 of the DSASP FEIR, would ensure that interior noise levels would meet the City’s  interior noise standard. Implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 4, which is  consistent with Mitigation Measure MM4.6‐5 of the DSASP FEIR, would ensure that groundborne  vibration levels would not exceed the FTA’s vibration impact criteria and would reduce impacts to a  less‐than‐significant level. Both of these mitigation measures are listed below.   MM4.6‐3 Site‐Specific Acoustic Analysis—Multifamily Residences. Prior to the approval of  building permits for the following uses, an acoustical analysis shall be performed to ensure that  interior noise levels due to exterior noise sources shall be below 45 dBA CNEL:  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐55  ○ Multifamily residences where exterior noise levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL or where noise  contours identified in the General Plan Noise Element project a CNEL between 65 and 70 dBA  ○ Multifamily residential units that are located within the same building as commercial  development  ○ Multifamily residential units located near a structure requiring an HVAC system  ○ Building plans shall be available during design review and shall demonstrate the accurate  calculation of noise attenuation for habitable rooms. For these areas, it may be necessary for  the windows to be able to remain closed to ensure that interior noise levels meet the interior  standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Consequently, based on the results of the interior acoustical  analysis, the design for buildings in these areas may need to include a ventilation or air  conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment with the windows closed.  Additionally, for new multifamily residences on properties where train horns and railroad  crossing warning signals are audible, the acoustical analysis shall ensure that interior noise  levels during crossing events do not exceed the Interior Noise Standards in Noise Ordinance  Section 8.32.040.   MM4.6‐4 Construction Vibration. For all construction activities within the study area, the  construction contract shall implement the following measures during construction:  ○ The construction contractor shall provide, at least three weeks prior to the start of  construction activities, written notification to all residential units and nonresidential tenants  within 115 of the construction site informing them of the estimated start date and duration  of vibration‐generating construction activities.  ○ Stationary sources, such as temporary generators, shall be located as far from off‐site  receptors as possible.  ○ Trucks shall be prohibited from idling along streets serving the construction site.   MM4.6‐5 Rail Line Groundborne Vibration. Implement the current FTA and Federal Railroad  Administration (FRA) guidelines, where appropriate, to limit the extent of exposure that sensitive  uses may have to groundborne vibration from trains. Specifically, Category 1 uses (vibration‐ sensitive equipment) within 300 feet from the rail line, Category 2 uses (residences and buildings  where people normally sleep) within 200 feet, and Category 3 uses (institutional land uses)  within 155 feet of the rail line shall require a site‐specific groundborne vibration analysis  conducted by a qualified groundborne vibration specialist in accordance with the current FTA  and FRA guidelines prior to obtaining a building permit. Vibration control measures deemed  appropriate by the site‐specific groundborne vibration analysis to meet 65 VdB, 72 VdB, and 75  VdB respectively for Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3 uses, shall be implemented by the  project applicant and approved by the City prior to receiving a building permit.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐56  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 9‐G‐1: Protect public health and welfare by eliminating or minimizing the effects of  existing noise problems, and by preventing increased noise levels in the future.   Policy 9‐G‐2: Continue efforts to incorporate noise considerations into land use planning  decisions, and guide the location and design of transportation facilities to minimize the effects of  noise on adjacent land uses.   Policy 9‐I‐4: Ensure that project applications for all new noise‐sensitive land uses (plans and  specifications), including hospitals and residential units proposed within the CNEL 60 dB to CNEL  69 dB aircraft noise contour include an acoustical study, prepared by a professional acoustic  engineer, that specifies the appropriate noise mitigation features to be included in the design  and construction of these uses, to achieve an interior noise level of not more than CNEL 45 dB in  any habitable room, based on the latest official SFIA noise contours and on‐site measurement  data.    Policy 9‐1‐5: Ensure that project applications for new noise‐sensitive land uses (plans and  specifications), including schools and places of assembly, proposed within the CNEL 60 dB to  CNEL 69 dB aircraft noise contour include an acoustical study, prepared by a professional  acoustic engineer, that specifies the appropriate noise mitigation features to be included in the  design and construction of these uses, to achieve an interior noise level of not more than Leq 45  dB for the noisiest hour of normal facility operation.    Policy 9‐I‐6: Require that applicants for new noise‐sensitive development in areas subject to  noise generators producing noise levels greater than 65 dB CNEL, obtain the services of a  professional acoustical engineer to provide a technical analysis and design of mitigation  measures.    Policy 9‐I‐7: Where site conditions permit, require noise buffering for all noise‐sensitive  development subject to noise generators producing noise levels greater than 65 dB CNEL. This  noise attenuation method should avoid the use of visible sound walls, where practical.   Policy 9‐I‐8: Require the control of noise at source through site design, building design,  landscaping, hours of operation, and other techniques, for new developments deemed to be  noise generators.    Policy 9‐I‐10: Do not allow new residential or noise sensitive development in 70 dB+ CNEL areas  impacted by SFO operations, as required by Airport Land Use Commission infill criteria.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐57  As noted above, the proposed project would be consistent with all applicable interior and exterior  noise standards for residential uses, would not include any new stationary noise sources that would  exceed applicable standards, and the applicant would be required to submit a site‐specific vibration  analysis confirming vibration levels would be less than 72 VdB, and therefore the proposed project  would further the policies listed above.   Conclusion  With implementation of Project‐Specific Condition of Approval 3 and Project‐Specific Condition of  Approval 4, the proposed project would not result in significant noise impacts.  13. POPULATION AND HOUSING    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either  directly (for example, by proposing new homes and  businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of  roads or other infrastructure)?        b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,  necessitating the construction of replacement housing  elsewhere?        c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the  construction of replacement housing elsewhere?        Discussion  Population Growth  The proposed project consists of the construction of 94 new residential units, and the addition of up  to 279 residents.20 This level of population growth would be consistent with the DSASP, which  analyzed the addition of 4,247 residents. As of March 2019, implementation of the DSASP has  resulted in the addition of an estimated 2,841 residents within the DSASP Plan Area. Additionally,  the DSASP also accounted for a higher employment rate in association with an increased population.  The proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of development assumed for  the project site in the DSASP, and therefore would not exceed the estimated buildout population.  Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to population growth.  Displacement of Housing and People  The DSASP FEIR concluded that the DSASP, and projects facilitated by it, would not result in  significant displacement impacts. Implementation of the DSASP would not displace significant  numbers of residents or residential units necessitating construction of replacement housing                                                               20  The DSASP FEIR assumes a resident generation rate of 2.96 persons per household.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐58  elsewhere as most new development, including the proposed project, would occur on commercial  or vacant sites. Additionally, the DSASP accommodates higher density residential development that  could support any affordable housing units lost through redevelopment in the DSASP Plan Area.  Therefore, the proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of people or existing  housing units, including affordable housing units, necessitating the construction of replacement  housing elsewhere. The proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than  those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to displacement of housing or people.   Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential population and housing impacts of the proposed  project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not  required.  14. PUBLIC SERVICES    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated  with the provision of new or physically altered  governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered  governmental facilities, the construction of which could  cause significant environmental impacts, in order to  maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other  performance objectives for any of the public services:       i. Fire protection?      ii. Police protection?      iii. Schools?      iv. Parks?      v. Other public facilities?        Discussion  Fire and Police Protection, Schools, and Parks  The City implemented a Public Safety Impact Fee in 2012. This fee is intended to fund improvements  in infrastructure or public services necessitated by new development. All development facilitated by  the DSASP would be required to pay this fee. Additionally, construction of new fire protection  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐59  facilities is not expected as a result of the proposed project, as the DSASP FEIR evaluated and  determined that current facilities are adequate. Additionally, all development within the DSASP Plan  Area would be required to comply with the provision of the CBC and California Fire Code pertaining  to fire protection systems and equipment, general safety precautions, and many other general and  specialized fire safety requirements for new and existing buildings and premises. Therefore,  compliance with Municipal Code requirements and payment of the Public Safety Impact Fee would  ensure that the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to public services.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the TASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 8.4‐I‐4: Require site design features, fire retardant building materials, and adequate  access as conditions for approval of development or improvement to reduce the risk of fire within  the City.   Policy 8.5‐I‐1: Ensure adequate police staff to provide rapid and timely response to all  emergencies and maintain the capability to have minimum average response times. Actions that  could be taken to ensure rapid and timely response to all emergencies include: Maintain a law  enforcement standard of 1.5 police officers per 1,000 residents.  DSASP Policies   Policy PS‐1: Continue to work with local school districts to ensure the capacity and quality of  schools serving the Specific Plan area.   Policy PS‐2: Monitor population and employment growth in the Specific Plan area to ensure  adequate police services.   Policy PS‐3: Implement and fund additional fire protection services to be consistent with and  adequate for the growth envisioned in this plan.  As noted above, as part of the proposed project a payment of the Public Safety Impact Fee would be  required. In addition, the proposed project would comply with all applicable codes and regulations  related to reduction of fire risk, and therefore would further the policies listed above.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐60  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential public services impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant, and additional mitigation is not  required.  15. RECREATION    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  a. Would the project increase the use of existing  neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational  facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the  facility would occur or be accelerated?       b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require  the construction or expansion of recreational facilities  which might have an adverse physical effect on the  environment?         Discussion  Increase the Use of Existing Neighborhood and Regional Parks  The proposed project would include approximately 8,040 of open space, including 3,610 square feet  of private balconies and two courtyards, as well as improvements to the adjacent Caltrain plaza. It is  expected that existing facilities serving the DSASP Plan Area would satisfy most, if not all, of the park  and open space needs generated by buildout of the DSASP, including the proposed project. The  DSASP FEIR concluded that there would be no significant parks and recreation impacts resulting  from projects within the DSASP. Additionally, upon build‐out of the DSASP, a network of new open  space opportunities is anticipated that will further serve the entire DSASP Plan Area, and new  residential development within the DSASP will be required to pay in‐lieu fees to support increases in  population. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and  intensity of development assumed for the project site within the DSASP, there would be no new or  more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to use of existing  neighborhood and regional parks.  Recreation Facilities  The proposed project would include private and common open space for use by residents, and  would not require the construction or expansion of public recreational facilities. As noted above,  existing facilities within the DSASP Plan Area are expected to satisfy most of the park and open  space needs. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and  intensity of development assumed for the project site within the DSASP, there would be no new or  more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to recreational  facilities.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐61  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.    Applicable Policies  DSASP Policies   Policy PS‐4: Plan for and encourage additional parks, open space and recreation facilities  throughout the Specific Plan area, as identified throughout this document and consistent with  the South San Francisco Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan.   Policy PS‐5: Implement proposed public open spaces at City Hall, at the Linden Neighborhood  Center, and in conjunction with the Caltrain pedestrian and bicycle undercrossing to provide  special community amenities in the Downtown that will complement traditional parks and  recreation facilities.  As noted above, the proposed project would include open space within the project site, as well as  improvements to the adjacent streetscape within the project site. In addition, the project applicant  would be required to contribute parks and recreation impact fees as a part of the proposed project.  Therefore, the proposed project would further the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential recreation impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐62  16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy  establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance  of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of  transportation including mass transit and non‐motorized  travel and relevant components of the circulation system,  including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways  and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass  transit?       b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management  program, including, but not limited to level of service  standards and travel demand measures, or other standards  established by the county congestion management agency  for designated roads or highways?       c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an  increase in traffic levels or a change in location which  results in substantial safety risks?       d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,  sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible  uses (e.g., farm equipment)?       e. Result in inadequate emergency access?      f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding  public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise  decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?         Discussion  Unless otherwise noted, the following is based on the 200 Airport Boulevard Traffic Study – South  San Francisco, CA (Traffic Study) prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation  Consultants, Inc.21,22 The Traffic Study is included in Appendix E.                                                               21  Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., 2018. 200 Airport Boulevard Traffic Study – South San  Francisco, CA. October 18.  22  It should be noted that the Traffic Study evaluated potential impacts associated with the development of  98 residential units on the project site. The proposed project has since been revised to include 4 fewer  units (94 units are proposed). Therefore, the analysis provided in the Traffic Study is conservative and  slightly overestimates the project’s contribution to circulation system impacts. The analysis and  conclusions found in the Traffic Study remain applicable to the currently proposed project.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐63  Conflict with an Applicable Plan, Ordinance, Policy, or Congestion Management Program  The DSASP FEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts at five intersections: E. Grand  Avenue/Gateway Boulevard, Grand Avenue/Airport Boulevard, San Mateo Avenue/Airport  Boulevard, South Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard, and Baden Avenue/Linden Avenue, as well  as impacts on freeway segments, freeway ramps, and transit service. Mitigations were included in  the DSASP FEIR, however, the South San Francisco City Council determined that such impacts could  not be avoided even with incorporation of these measures, and that no other feasible mitigations or  alterative would avoid or lessen the impacts. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations  (SOC) was adopted for the DSASP on January 28, 2015 that weighed new development benefits  against potential impacts and determined that significant and unavoidable impacts to transportation  and traffic were in the City’s best interests. The proposed project is in compliance with all applicable  DSASP regulations, and as a result, would not create any additional transportation or traffic impacts  beyond those which were already analyzed in the DSASP FEIR and SOC.  The Traffic Study found that the proposed project would cause a queueing impact at the  intersection of San Mateo Avenue and Airport Boulevard during the PM peak hour under existing  and background conditions. The queueing analysis showed that the 95th percentile queue at San  Mateo Avenue/Airport Boulevard for some movements exceeded the available storage during at  least one of the peak hours under existing and background conditions. The proposed project would  add traffic to the westbound right‐turn movement, increasing the 95th percentile queues under  existing plus project conditions and background plus project conditions. The proposed project would  increase the traffic volume by more than 1 percent for the westbound right‐turn movement.  Although this would be considered a significant impact based on the intersection significant impact  criteria, the 95th percentile queue length for the westbound right‐turn lane would only increase by  20 feet (equivalent to one vehicle) during the PM peak hour with the proposed project and is not  expected to block the through or left‐turn traffic. The queue beyond the right‐turn pocket would be  contained within the adjacent westbound through lane and would be served along with the through  traffic. It would cause only a marginal increase in delay to the through traffic.  The DSASP FEIR identified Mitigation Measure MM4.10‐5 under cumulative conditions, which  requires modifying the westbound approach to add a left‐turn pocket, modifying the approach to  include three left‐turn lanes, one through lane, and one right‐turn lane, and optimizing the traffic  signal to reallocate green time to better serve future volumes. According to the DSASP FEIR,  implementation of this mitigation measure would allow the intersection to accommodate the 95th  percentile queues for all turning movements within the available storage capacities.  The project site is located less than 0.25‐miles from the existing Caltrain station and would be  approximately a 2‐minute walk after the planned reconstruction of the Caltrain station is complete.  According to guidelines outlined in the City of South San Francisco General Plan,23 development  within 0.25 mile of a Caltrain or Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station, or Ferry terminal can be  exempt from Level of Service (LOS) standards.                                                               23  City of South San Francisco, 1999.     200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐64  Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those  previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to applicable transportation plans.  Air Traffic Patterns  The proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns at San Francisco  International Airport or any other airport, including either an increase in air traffic levels or a change  in location that results in substantial safety risks. Therefore, the proposed project would not result  in any new or more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to air  traffic patterns.  Design Hazards  The proposed project would operate within the existing roadway system and proposes pedestrian  safety enhancements to reduce pedestrian hazards. Additionally, the Traffic Study evaluated on‐site  circulation to determine safety concerns. The Traffic Study included the following recommendations  for site access, which would be required as conditions of approval for the proposed project:   The proposed project should designate a loading area for moving/delivery trucks and  ridesharing vehicles to pick‐up and drop‐off residents.   The proposed project should include a Travel Demand Management (TDM) program to  implement strategies to encourage residents to use transit and off‐set the potential parking  deficit.  Therefore, because the proposed project would implement the above recommendations as  conditions of approval, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts  than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to design hazards.  Emergency Access  The proposed project would utilize the existing roadways in the vicinity of the project site. The  project design would be required to comply with all applicable City codes and regulations pertaining  to emergency access, as well as fire protection and security. In addition, the building would include a  sprinkler system; Knox key box for each building with access keys to entry doors, electrical/ mechanical rooms, elevators, and others to be determined; and maps mounted at entry gates for  rapid orientation while responding to emergencies. Additionally, as noted in Section 14, Public  Services, the City implemented the Public Safety Impact Fee in 2012 for all new development. This  fee is intended to fund improvements to infrastructure or public services necessitated by new  development to ensure adequate emergency access, which would be applicable to the proposed  project. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than  those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to emergency access.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐65  Public Transit, Bicycle Facilities, and Pedestrian Facilities  Implementation of the proposed project would not require on‐ or off‐site improvements that would  conflict with existing policies, plans, or programs that support alternative transportation. The  project site is located less than 0.25 mile from a regional rail station (Caltrain) and bus stop  (SamTrans). In addition, the proposed project would support both bike and pedestrian usage  consistent with the DSASP, including secure bike parking, sidewalk improvements, landscaping, and  public bike racks. The Traffic Study included the following recommendation, which would be  required as a condition of approval for the proposed project:   The proposed project shall provide 12 short‐term bicycle parking spaces on site as required by  the zoning ordinance.  Therefore, because the proposed project would implement the above recommendation as a  condition of approval, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts  than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian  facilities.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 2‐G‐11: Exempt development within one‐quarter mile of a Caltrain or BART station, or a  City‐designated ferry terminal, from LOS standards.   Policy 2‐I‐7: Continue to require that new development pays a fair share of the costs of street  and other traffic and transportation improvements, based on traffic generated and impacts on  service levels. Explore the feasibility of establishing impact fee, especially for improvements  required in the Lindenville area.  DSASP Policies   Guiding Principle 29: Improve access to transit, especially the Caltrain Station.   Policy C‐1: Ensure Grand Avenue east and west of US 101 is the centerpiece of the Pedestrian  Priority Zone that provides vehicle access for local businesses but also calms traffic through  design features.   Policy C‐6: Accommodate necessary vehicle traffic, but design these streets to be compatible  with active nearby uses with wider sidewalks, transit improvements, or bicycle facilities where  feasible.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐66   Policy C‐11: Coordinate intersection and capacity improvements with implementation of the  pedestrian/bicycle undercrossing and the expansion/elongation of the Caltrain Station platforms.   Policy C‐24: Implement improvements to Airport Boulevard to incorporate bicycle lanes,  consistent with the City’s Bicycle Master Plan.   Policy C‐25: Implement bicycle lanes on Airport Boulevard south of Miller Avenue, on Gateway  Boulevard north of East Grand Avenue, and on Grand Avenue, in concert with redesign of the  street and enhanced streetscape improvements.  As noted above, the proposed project would be exempted from LOS standards as it would be within  0.25‐mile of the Caltrain station, and the project applicant would contribute a fair share of the costs  of infrastructure improvements. In addition, the proposed project would include public bicycle  racks, encourage the use of public transit with the implementation of a Transportation Demand  Management Plan (TDM), and improve sidewalks along the project site’s street frontage. Therefore,  the proposed project would further the policies listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the transportation impacts of the proposed project.  Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new transportation and additional mitigation  is not required.  17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a  tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code  Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural  landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size  and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with  cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that  is:       i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of  Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical  resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section  5020.1(k)? Or       ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its  discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be  significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision  (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying  the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public  Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall  consider the significance of the resource to a California  Native American tribe.       ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐67    Discussion  Tribal cultural resources were evaluated in Section 4.3, Cultural Resources, of the DSASP FEIR. A  records search was performed at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) and included a review  of previous cultural resources surveys and documented resources for the DSASP Plan Area and all  lands found within a 0.5‐mile radius. The results of the record search indicated that 25 previous  studies had been completed within the DSASP Plan Area; seven cultural resources, including three  potential tribal cultural resources, were located within the DSASP Plan Area; and twelve cultural  resources were located within 0.5 mile. Additionally, as noted in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the  DSASP FEIR identifies an additional five historic resources within the DSASP Plan Area.   The project site does not contain any of the known archaeological resources located within the  DSASP Plan Area. However, archaeological sites that contain intact, undisturbed cultural deposits  that could be considered tribal cultural resources may be located below the level of previous  disturbance. The proposed project would thus be required to comply with Mitigation Measures  MM4.3‐3 and MM4.3‐4 from the DSASP FEIR, which require construction personnel involved in  ground‐disturbing activities to undergo environmental awareness training and earth‐disturbing  activities to be halted if evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resources is  discovered. Therefore, with implementation of these mitigation measures, the proposed project  would not create a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource.  Additionally, as noted in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the HRE concluded that none of the existing  buildings appear eligible for inclusion of the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) of the  City’s List of Designated and Potential Historic Resources under any significance criteria. Therefore,  the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those previously  identified in the DSASP FEIR related to tribal cultural resources.  Applicable Mitigation  The proposed project could have potentially significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources.  Implementation of the below mitigation measures from the DSASP FEIR would ensure that  construction of the proposed project would result in a less‐than‐significant impact. No new  mitigation measures would be required.   MM4.3‐3 If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected historical resource as defined  by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, are discovered during any project‐related earth‐disturbing  activities (including projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth‐disturbing  activity within 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of South San Francisco shall be  notified. The project applicant shall retain a City‐approved archaeologist to assess the  significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less‐than‐ significant level through methods determined adequate by the archaeologist as approved by the  City.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐68   MM4.3‐4 Prior to start of construction, all construction personnel involved in ground‐disturbing  activities and the supervision of such activities will undergo worker environmental awareness  training. The archaeological resources training components will be presented by a City‐approved  cultural resources consultant. The training will describe the types of archaeological resources  that may be found in the proposed study area and how to recognize such resources; the  protocols to be followed if archaeological resources are found, including communication  protocols; and the laws relevant to the protection of archaeological resources and the associated  penalties for breaking these laws. Additionally, prior to construction, City‐approved  archaeological resources consultants will meet with the applicant’s grading and excavation  contractors to provide comments and suggestions concerning monitoring plans and to discuss  excavation and grading plans.  Applicable Policies  General Plan Policies   Policy 7.5‐G‐1: Conserve historic, cultural, and archaeological resources for the aesthetic,  education, economic, and scientific contribution they make to South San Francisco’s identity and  quality of life.   Policy 7.5‐G‐2: Encourage municipal and community awareness, appreciation, and support for  South San Francisco’s historic, cultural, and archaeological resources.   Policy 7.5‐I‐4: Ensure the protection of known archaeological resources in the city by requiring a  records review for any development proposed areas of known resources.   Policy 7.5‐I‐5: In accordance with State law, require the preparation of a resource mitigation plan  and monitoring program by a qualified archaeologist in the event that archaeological resources  are uncovered.  The proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to any tribal resources and  would comply with all applicable State laws in the event that tribal or archaeological resources are  discovered, and therefore would comply with the goals listed above.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential tribal cultural resources impacts for the  proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional  mitigation is not required.   ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐69  18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS    New  Potentially  Significant  Impact  New   Mitigation  Required  Reduced  Impact  No New  Impact  Would the project:      a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the  applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?      b. Require or result in the construction of new water or  wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing  facilities, the construction of which could cause significant  environmental effects?       c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water  drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the  construction of which could cause significant environmental  effects?       d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project  from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or  expanded entitlements needed?       e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment  provider which serves or may serve the project that it has  adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand  in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?       f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to  accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?      g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and  regulations related to solid waste?        Discussion  Wastewater Treatment Requirements  The DSASP FEIR concluded that the South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant,  located in South San Francisco, would be able to continue to meet or exceed the wastewater  treatment requirements established by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board  (Regional Water Board) with the additional wastewater generated by development permitted under  the DSASP. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity  of the development assumed for the project site in the DSASP, there would be no new or more  severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to wastewater treatment  requirements.  Water and Wastewater Facilities  The DSASP FEIR concluded that development occurring under the DSASP would not necessitate the  construction or expansion of water or wastewater facilities. Therefore, because the proposed  project would be consistent with the type and intensity of the development assumed for the project  site in the DSASP, there would be no new or more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in  the DSASP FEIR related to water and wastewater facilities.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐70  Stormwater Drainage Facilities  The DSASP FEIR concluded that no significant increase in storm water runoff was anticipated to be  created by the DSASP or DSASP‐facilitated development. Additionally, each individual project within  the DSASP is required to submit documentation consistent with the State and San Mateo County  Water Pollution Prevention Program requirements, which are peer reviewed by the Water Quality  Division of the City’s Department of Public Works.  The proposed project is expected to qualify for a 100 percent exemption under Special Project  Category “C” (Transit‐Oriented Development [TOD] Project) of the San Mateo County Water  Pollution Prevention Program, which means that the project would be 100 percent exempt (in storm  drainage volume) from low impact development (LID) requirements because the project:  (1) is  within 0.25mile of a transit hub; (2) has a minimum density of 100 dwelling units per acre (project  density would be 171 units per acre); and (3) would contain no surface parking. The result would be  that up to 100 percent of the project site’s impervious surface runoff could be treated with media  filter devices approved by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA).  This proposed exemption is subject to City review and approval.  Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of the  development assumed for the project site in the DSASP, there would be no new or more severe  impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to stormwater drainage facilities.  Water Supply  The City, including the project site, is served by the California Water Service (Cal Water) South San  Francisco District. Cal Water obtains water from a purchasing agreement with San Francisco Public  Utilities Commission (SFPUC), which is supplied by local surface water sources within its Regional  Water System, and from its own groundwater sources. Future area water supplies would be  delivered through existing City supply facilities and new water infrastructure constructed for  delivery into specific project sites. Adequate delivery was identified within the DSASP FEIR for all  anticipated new development within the DSASP Plan Area. Therefore, because the proposed project  would be consistent with the type and intensity of the development assumed for the project site in  the DSASP, there would be no new or more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the  DSASP FEIR related to water supply.  Wastewater Capacity  Sewage and wastewater generated within the City is collected through the City’s sewer system and  is disposed of and treated at the South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant  (WQCP). The sanitary sewer system has an interconnecting network of approximately 12 miles of 6‐ inch to 30‐inch‐diameter gravity sewer mains, force mains, and twelve pump stations, which  function together to bring wastewater from individual homes and businesses to the WQCP. Some  pump stations act as tributaries to a few stations that handle most of the wastewater from large  portions of the community. Title 14 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code ensures the future  health, safety, and general welfare of the City and provides regulations for the City’s wastewater  collection and treatment system.  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐71  Wastewater generation is correlated with water usage and continued water conservation practices  would reduce the volume of wastewater generated. New developments, including the proposed  project, would be required to comply with all provisions of the NPDES program as well as all  applicable wastewater discharge requirements issued by the Regional Water Board, as noted in  Section 9 “Hydrology and Water Quality” of this report. The City would maintain local sewer lines  and perform upgrades on an as‐needed basis. It is anticipated that the increased flows from  development under the DSASP, including the proposed project, would not result in required  upgrades to the reclamation plants. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent  with the type and intensity of the development assumed for the project site in the DSASP, there  would be no new or more severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related  to stormwater drainage facilities.  Solid Waste  Construction of the proposed project would comply with all applicable solid waste regulations. The  DSASP FEIR concluded that there is sufficient landfill capacity for full buildout of the DSASP Plan  Area. Solid waste service at the project site would be provided by the South San Francisco Scavenger  Company. Therefore, because the proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity  of the development assumed for the project site in the DSASP, there would be no new or more  severe impacts than those previously analyzed in the DSASP FEIR related to solid waste.  Applicable Mitigation  No substantial changes in environmental circumstances have occurred for this topic. Additionally,  there have been no revisions to the project, nor new information that could not have been known at  the time the DSASP FEIR was certified leading to new or more severe significant impacts. Thus, no  new mitigation measures are required.  Conclusion  The DSASP FEIR adequately evaluated the potential utilities impacts for the proposed project.  Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and additional mitigation is not required.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐72  This page intentionally left blank       ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐73  2.0 LIST OF PREPARERS  LSA Associates, Inc.  157 Park Place  Pt. Richmond, CA 94801  Theresa Wallace, AICP, Principal‐in‐Charge  Matthew Wiswell, Project Manager  Amy Fischer, Principal/Air Quality and Noise Specialist  Cara Carlucci, Planner/Air Quality and Noise Specialist  Leland Villavazo, Air Quality Specialist  Andrew Pulcheon, AICP, CEP, Principal/Archaeologist  Michael Hibma, Associate/Architectural Historian  Patty Linder, Graphics and Production  Marie So, Graphics and Production  Charis Hanshaw, Document Management    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐74  This page intentionally left blank  ATTACHMENT B   ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST  APRIL 2019  200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA     \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐75  3.0 REFERENCES  Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2010. Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan.  Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017. Clean Air Plan. April 19.  California Department of Water Resources, 2018. Dam Inundation Maps. Website:  https://water.ca.gov/Programs/All‐Programs/Division‐of‐Safety‐of‐Dams/Inundation‐Maps  (accessed November 9, 2018).  California Emergency Management Agency, 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning  (map). June 15.  California, State of, 2016. Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder (map).  Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff (accessed November 6, 2018).  CertainTeed, 2003. Noise Control in Buildings. Guidelines for Acoustical Problem Solving. October.  Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012. Flood Rate Insurance Map No. 06081C0043E.  October 16.  Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2018. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 7‐Story Mixed‐Use  Development, South San Francisco, California. June 18.  Harris, C.M., 1998. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control.  Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., 2018. 200 Airport Boulevard Traffic Study – South San  Francisco, CA. October 18.  LSA Associates, Inc., 2018. Historical Resource Evaluation of 200, 206, 210, and 214 Airport  Boulevard, South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California (LSA Project #FFD1801).  October 9.  LSA Associates, Inc., 2019. Health Risk Assessment for 200 Airport Boulevard. January.  LSA Associates, Inc., 2019. Noise Impact Analysis for 200 Airport Boulevard. January.  Milgard, 2008. Sound Transmission Loss Test Report No. TL08‐149. February.  Partner Engineering and Science, 2018. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for the Borba  Property at 200‐214 Airport Boulevard, South San Francisco, California 94080. May 11.  South San Francisco, City of, 1999. City of South San Francisco General Plan.    200 AIRPORT BOULEVARD PROJECT  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA  ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APRIL 2019   \\PTR11\projects\FFD1801 200 Airport Blvd\PRODUCTS\ECA\Final_4\B_200 Airport Blvd Checklist.docx (04/25/19) B‐76  South San Francisco, City of, 2014. South San Francisco General Plan. Open Space and Conservation  Element, as amended. February 12.  South San Francisco, City of, 2018. Ordinance 1553‐2018. March 28.