Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-07-27 e-packet AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, JULY 27,2005 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. RA YMOND L. GREEN Chair JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Vice Chair RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR. Boardmember PEDRO GONZALEZ Boardmember KARYL MATSUMOTO Boardmember RICHARD BATTAGLIA Investment Officer SYLVIA M. PAYNE Clerk BARRY M. NAGEL Executive Director STEVEN T. MATT AS Counsel PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of July 13, 2005 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of July 27,2005 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AGENDA mLY 27, 2005 PAGE 2 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, JULY 27,2005 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. RAYMOND L. GREEN Mayor JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Mayor Pro Tem RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR. Councilman PEDRO GONZALEZ Councilman KARYL MATSUMOTO Councilwoman RICHARD BATTAGLIA City Treasurer SYLVIA M. PAYNE City Clerk BARRY M. NAGEL City Manager STEVEN T. MATT AS City Attorney PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMP AIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS · Update on gang activity in the community - Police Chief Mark Raffaelli and Corporal Bruce McPhillips · Revitalization of Will ow Gardens - Housing and Redevelopment Manager Norma Fragoso AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL · Announcements · Committee Reports CONSENT CALENDAR I. Motion to approve the minutes of July 13, 2005 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of July 27, 2005 3. Resolution authorizing amendment to the professional services agreement with Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver and Wilson . 4. Resolution approving the proposed updated SFO/Community Roundtable Memorandum of Understanding 5. Resolution authorizing the installation of stop signs on Railroad A venue at Magnolia A venue 6. Motion to accept the Common Greens Irrigation Upgrade Project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications 7. Resolution authorizing the submittal of an application to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District for funds to reduce emissions from eight South San Francisco Scavenger Company solid waste collection vehicles in the amount of $88,200 8. Resolution accepting grant funding from various sources to support the Library's Artist in the Middle, Reader Leader and Summer Reading Club programs in the amount of $28,233 PUBLIC HEARING 9. Consideration of resolution establishing Stormwater Management Program charges for the FY 2005-06 and resolution adopting the Finance Director's Report on FY 2005-06 Stormwater Management Service Fees COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA mLY 27, 2005 PAGE 2 ~'t\\ s~ if! ~ . ~~\ (0 0 >< .... ~ ~ v c D.lJ~"~ Staff Regort AGENDA ITEM #3 DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney SUBJECT: Contract Amendment for Professional Services Agreement between South San Francisco and Meyers Nave for Legal Services RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution authorizing Amendment No. 10 to the Professional Services Agreement between South San Francisco and Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver and Wilson. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City Council is hereby requested to consider and approve Amendment No. 10 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of South San Francisco and Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver and Wilson. The proposed contract amendment modifies four elements of the existing contract. First, the contract eliminates the partial monthly reimbursement for secretarial services that existed in the prior contract, as the incumbent in that position resigned in June 2005 and, at present, there are no plans to fill that position. This will result in a savings to the City of approximately $1735 per month. The second change is to modify the payment structure for redevelopment legal services. Specifically, RDA legal services will be billed at hourly rates of $175 per hour for associates and $225 per hour for principals and "Of Counsel" attorneys. The third change is to modify the amount paid for retainer services. This change includes reducing the amount of the prior legal services retainer by $4,158 per month, the amount previously allocated for RDA services, and then including an increase of five percent to the adjusted amount. The retainer amount under the proposed contact is $30,914 per month. This change also includes adding a provision that authorizes payment at $175 per hour for any retainer hours in excess of 250 hours per month. Prior to this proposed amendment to the retainer amount, the last such amendment was in June 2002. The final change is to increase the fixed monthly amount for postage, photocopying and U.S. mail costs by five percent from $500 per month to $525 per month. 772160-1 There are no changes proposed to the land use cost recovery rates or the litigation rates paid by the City. ~~ !t~~&' Steven T. attas, City Attorney 772160-1 AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER AND WILSON The City of South San Francisco and Meyers-Nave do hereby agree as follows: 1. Section 4 "Compensation - Basic Services" is hereby amended to read as follows: "City shall pay the amount of Thirty Thousand Nine Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($30,914) per month effective July 1, 2005 for up to 250 hours per month of Basic Services, excluding redevelopment legal services, as described in Section 1. City shall pay Law Firm $175 per hour for any Basic Services provided to City in excess of 250 hours per month. In addition to Basic Services compensation, Law Firm shall also be paid for (1) redevelopment legal services at the rate of $225 per hour for Principals and Of Counsel attorneys and $175 per hour for associate attorneys and (2) cost recovery matters involving land use entitlements at the rate of $250 per hour for Principals, $225 per hour for Senior Associates and "Of Counsel" attorneys, and $200 per hour for Junior Associates with the City's costs reimbursed by the development applicant. F or purposes of this section, cost recovery matters shall include the following: 1) all non-residential projects requiring approval of a conditional use permit, planned unit development, development agreement, zoning amendment, general plan amendment, specific plan or amendment thereto or other discretionary approval; 2) all residential or mixed use projects containing four (4) or more residential units and/or those residential projects requesting an owner participation agreement, disposition and development agreement, affordable housing agreement or development agreement; and 3) any project requiring a mitigated negative declaration, environmental impact report, or an addendum to an environmental impact report. In addition to the Basic Services compensation, Law Firm shall also be reimbursed $525 per month for photocopy/faxlU.S. mail costs incurred at the Law Firm's Oakland office. City shall also reimburse Law Firm for the actual costs paid by Law Firm for Westlaw and Lexus computer research services, messenger services and document requests. 770602-1 2. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions ofthe Professional Services Agreement between the City and Meyers-Nave shall remain in full force and effect for the term of this Agreement. This amendment shall be effective as of July 1, 2005. Date: City of South San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California By: Barry M. Nagel, City Manager Attest: Sylvia Payne, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson By: Special Counsel Steven T. Mattas, Principal 770602-1 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND MEYERS NAVE WHEREAS, the City and Meyers-Nave entered into a professional services agreement in March 1994; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement to modify the compensation provided to Meyers-Nave. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby: 1. Approve Amendment No.1 0 to the Professional Services Agreement as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; 2. Authorizes the City Manager to sign, on behalf of the City, Amendment No. 10. * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 182936-2 - ~'t\\ s~ '. 10 0 >< t;; ~ t') 1.) 0 ~4!# Staff Report A GENDA ITEM #4 DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Barry M. Nagel, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution Approving the Proposed Updated Airport/Community Roundtable Memorandum of Understanding RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the proposed updated Airport/Community Roundtable Memorandum of Understanding. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION At its meeting on April 6, 2005, the Roundtable unanimously approved the enclosed Roundtable Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) for distribution to the individual Roundtable members for review and approval. This document is an update of the 1981 MOU that created the Roundtable. It will replace the original 1981 MOD upon approval of at least two-thirds (16 of the 23 current members) of the Roundtable membership. As with many organizations, the Roundtable has changed since it began meeting nearly 24 years ago. After careful consideration by the Roundtable members, Chairperson, Marland Townsend, appointed Supervisor Mark Church, the Roundtable Vice Chair/County of San Mateo representative, to Chair a Roundtable MOU Update Subcommittee. Subcommittee members included Michael McCarron, Director SFO Bureau of Community Affairs; Jack Barry, San Francisco Mayor's Office representative; . Clara Johnson, City of Brisbane representative and Marland Townsend, as Chair of the San Francisco International Airport Community Roundtable. The subcommittee carefully reviewed the structure and content of the 1981 MOU, as amended, to prepare the attached updated MOU that will serve as the foundation document for the Roundtable now and in the future. The intent of the updated MOU is to provide the continuing operation of the Roundtable by: (1) retaining the original spirit and focus of the Roundtable, (2) clearly stating its purpose and objectives, (3) establishing the terms of the agreement, and (4) defining the Roundtable membership, operations and support. The updated document also incorporates the previous two amendments to the original 1981 MOU. Staff Report - July 27. 2005 Subject: Resolution Approving the Proposed Updated Airport/Community Roundtable Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 CONCLUSION As Council's aware, Mayor Green (Councilmember Garbarino - alternate) represents the City of South San Francisco on the Roundtable. Consistent with the unanimous approval on April 6,2005, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed updated Airport/Community Roundtable MOU. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Updated MOD Approved by the Roundtable on April 6, 2005 3. 1981 Roundtable MOU, as amended 4. Signature page RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UPDATED AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) REPLACING THE ORIGINAL 1981 MOU (WITH AMENDMENTS#lIl992 AND #2/1997) WHEREAS, the Airport/Community Roundtable approved an update to the 1981 . Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that created the Roundtable; and WHEREAS, a sub-committee was formed to review the structure and content of the 1981 MOU, as amended, and to update accordingly; and WHEREAS, the intent of the updated MOU is to provide for the continuing operation of the Roundtable; and WHEREAS, by updating the 1981 MOU, as amended, the Roundtable would retain its original spirit and focus, clearly state its purpose and objectives, establish the terms of the agreement and define the Roundtable membership, operations and support. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council is hereby authorized to approve the proposed updated Airport/Community Roundtable MOU. * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Fnincisco at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE APPROVED BY THE ROUNDTABLE: APRIL 6,2005 EFFECTIVE DATE: San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable Administration Office 1828 EI Camino Real, Suite 705 Burlingame, CA 94010 Ph: 650/ 692-6597 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Approved by. the Roundtable on April 6, 2005 Effective Date: CONTENTS Preamble Article I Statement of Purpose and Objectives Article II Agreement Article III Roundtable Membership Article IV Roundtable Operations and Support Article V Amending This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Article VI Status of Prior Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) and Related Amendments Article VII Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Adoption and Effective Date Attachment: Signature Page for Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Signatory Agency MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTICOMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Preamble San Francisco International Airport is owned and operated by the City and County of San Francisco but is located entirely within neighboring San Mateo County. Because of the shared impacts that result from airport operations, the two counties entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) in 1978 to quantify the impacts and to identify possible mitigation actions. The implementation of the mitigations noted by the Joint Powers Board, in its Joint Action Plan, called for the formation of a formal structure and process to oversee the implementation of the numerous-mitigation actions outlined in the Plan. In May 1981, the County of San Mateo, the County Airport land Use Committee (ALUC), and the governing bodies of 11 cities/towns located in San Mateo County near the Airport1 entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City and County of San Francisco to create a public body known as the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable (Roundtable). Under this agreement, the Roundtable became a committee formed to work cooperativ~ly to. oversee the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Joint Action Plan adopted by the Joint Powers Board in 1980. Those recommendations addressed various community impacts from the operation of San Francisco International Airport, including aircraft noise, vehicular ground access, and air quality. Since its first meeting on June 3, 1981, the Roundtable has' focused its efforts on reducing aircraft noise impacts in affected neighborhoods and communities, Vehicular airport ground access and airport-related air quality issues have been and continue to be addressed by other Bay Area public agencies. In October 1992, the original MOU was amended for the first time, in response to the Airport Commission's adoption and implementation of a San Francisco International Airport Master Plan. The Master Plan provided for the expansion, consolidation, and remodeling of airport landside facilities, through the year 2006. MOU Amendment NO.1 also provided for the development of a Roundtable Joint Work Plan, for which the Airport Commission agreed to provide funding to the Roundtable, iri the amount of $100,000 per year, from 1993 through 2000. Under that amendment, the Airport Commission also agreed to spend up to $120 million to fund aircraft noise insulation projects in eligible cities. 1 The original 1981 Roundtable MOU signatory cities/towns within San Mateo County included the following: City of Brisbane, City of Burlingame, Town of Colma, City of Daly City, City of Foster City, Town of Hillsborough, City of Millbrae, City of Pacifica, City of San Bruno, City of San Mateo, an the City of South San Francisco. The Town of Colma and the City of San Mateo withdrew their membership shortly after the Roundtable began meeting in 1981. Nine cities in San Mateo County remained members until additional cities joined in 1997. . MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Page 2 of 7 Preamble - continued In June 1997, the 1981 MOU, as amended, was amended a second time, to allow non- member cities and towns in San Mateo County to join the Roundtable. MOU Amendment No.2 specified the procedures for joining the Roundtable and established an annual financial contribution requirement for new member jurisdictions. As a result of that amendment, the Roundtable membership increased from 13 to 23 members. In 2004, the Roundtable Chairperson appointed a Roundtable subcommittee to review the 1981 MOU, as amended, and update the document to provide for improved operation and efficiency of the Roundtable as a public body. The following language is a consolidation of the previous MOU and Amendments Nos.1 and 2, in a more organized and comprehensive format. Also included is additional language to reflect the continuing status of the Roundtable and to provide for more efficient operation of the organization, as a whole. ARTICLE I: Statement of Purpose and Objectives 1. Purpose . . As a result of more than twenty-four years of cooperation between the San Francisco Airport Commission, noise-impacted communities, the federal government, and the airlines operating at San Francisco International Airport, the Roundtable has facilitated numerous aircraft noise mitigation achievements to improve the quality of life in communities near the Airport. The overall purpose of the Roundtable is to continue to foster and enhance this cooperative relationship to develop, evaluate, and implement reasonable and feasible policies, procedures, and mitigation actions that will further reduce the impacts of aircraft noise in neighborhoods and communities in San Francisco and San Mateo Counties. 2. Objectives Objective 1: Continue to organiz(3' administer, and operate the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable as a public forum for discussion, study, analysis, and evaluation of policies, procedures and mitigation actions that will minimize aircraft noise impacts to help improve the quality of life of residents in San Mateo and San Francisco Counties. Objective 2: Provide a framework of understanding as to the history and operation of the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable. Objective 3: Maintain the San. Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable as a focal point of information and discussion between local, state, and federal legislators and policy makers, as it applies to noise impacts from airport/aircraft operations in local communities. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OFTHE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Page 3 of 7 Objectives - continued Objective 4: Develop and implement an annual Roundtable Work Program to analyze and evaluate the impacts of aircraft noise in affected communities and to make recommendations to appropriate agencies, regarding implementation of effective noise mitigation actions. Objective 5: Maintain communication and cooperation between Airport management and local governments, regarding: (1) local agency land use and zoning decisions within noise-sensitive and/or overflight areas, while recognizing local government autonomy to make those decisions and (2) decisions/actions that affect current and future on-airport development, while recognizing the Airport Commission's autonomy to make those decisions. ARTICLE II: Agreement Signatory agencies/bodies to this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agree as follows: 1. Accept in concept and spirit the continuing operation of the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable as described in the "Statement of Purpose and Objectives," as stated in Article I. 2. Work cooperatively to reduce the impacts of noise, from aircraft operations at San Francisco International Airport, in affected neighborhoods and communities. 3. Provide the necessary means (Le'-, funding, staff support, supplies, etc.) to enable the Roundtable to achieve a reduction and mitigation of aircraft noise impacts, as addressed in this agreement. 4. Represent and inform the respective constituencies of the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable members of the Roundtable's activities and actions to reduce aircraft noise impacts. 5. Support and abide by Roundtable Resolution No. 93-01, which states, in part, that the Roundtable members, as a group, will not take any action(s) that would result in the "shifting" of noise from one community to another, related to aircraft operations at San Francisco International Airport. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Page 4 of 7 ARTICLE III: Roundtable Membership 1. Existing voting membership - The existing Roundtable voting membership (March 2005) consists of one designated Representative and one designated Alternate from the following agencies/bodies: City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors City and County of San Francisco Mayor's Office City and County of San Francisco Airport Commission County of San Mateo Board of Supervisors City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (CCAG) Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC) T own of Atherton City of Belmont City of Brisbane City of Burlingame City of Daly City City of Foster City City of Half Moon Bay Town of Hillsborough City of Menlo Park City of Millbrae City of Pacifica Town of Portola Valley City of Redwood City City of San Bruno City of San Carlos City of San Mateo City of South San Francisco Town of Woodside 2. Elected/Appointed Membership - All Hepresentatives and Alternates who serve on the Roundtable shall be elected officials (Le., Council Members, Supervisors, etc.) from the agencies/bodies they represent and serve at the pleasure of their appointing agency/body, except Representatives and Alternates from the following, who shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of their appointing entity: City and County of San Francisco Mayor's Office City and County of San Francisco Airport Commission C/CAG Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPO,RT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Page 5 of 7 ARTICLE III: Roundtable Membership - continued 3. Non-Voting Membership - Roundtable non-voting membership shall consist of Advisory Members who represent the following: a. Chief Pilots from airlines operating at San Francisco International Airport b. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) staff . 4. Additional Voting Membership - Other incorporated towns and/or cities located within San Mateo County may request voting membership on the San Francisco International Airport/Community Roundtable by adopting a resolution: a. Authorizing two members of the city/town council (a Representative and Alternate) to represent the city/town on the Roundtable. b. Agreeing to comply with this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and all related amendments and any bylaws approved in accordance with this MOU. c. Agreeing to contribute annual funding to the Roundtable in the same amount as current city/townmembers contribute, at the time of the membership request, or such annual funding as approved by the Roundtable for new members. 5. Withdrawal of a Voting Member - Any voting member may withdraw from the Roundtable by filing a written Notice of Intent to Withdraw from the Roundtable, with the Roundtable Chairperson, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of the withdrawal. ARTICLE IV: Roundtable Operations and Support 1. Roundtable operations shall be guided by a set of comprehensive bylaws that govern the operation, administration, funding, and management of the Roundtable and its activities. 2. Roundtable staff support shall be provided by the San Francisco Airport Commission and the County of San Mateo. Additional technical staff support may be provided by consultant(s), as needed, in accordance with the relevant provisions in the adopted Roundtable Bylaws.. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDT ABLE Page 6 of 7 ARTICLE V: Amending This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 1. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) may be amended as follows: Step 1: Roundtable consideration of a proposed MOU amendment Any voting member of the Roundtable may propose an amendment to this MOU. The proposal shall be made at a Roundtable Regular Meeting. Once proposed and seconded by another voting member, at least two-thirds of the voting membership must approve the proposed amendment. If the proposed amendment receives at leastthe necessary two-thirds votes for approval, the amendment shall then be forwarded to the respective councils/boards of the Roundtable membership agencies/bod ies for consideration/action. Step 2: Roundtable member agency/body consideration of a proposed MOU amendment The proposed MOU amendment must be approved by at least two-thirds of the respective councils/boards ofthe Roundtable member agencies/bodies by a majority vote of each of those bodies. If at least two-thirds' of the member agencies/bodies approve the proposed amendment, the amendment becomes effective. If less than two-thirds of the member agencies/bodies approve the proposed MOU amendment, the proposal fails. 2. This MOU may not be amended more than once in a calendar year. ARTICLE VI: Status of Prior Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and Related Amendments Adoption of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall supercede and replace all prior MOU agreements and related amendments. ARTICLE VII: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Adoption and Effective Date 1. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall be deemed adopted and effective upon adoption by at least two thirds of the jurisdictions listed in Article III, 2. The effective date of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall be the date of approval by at least two-thirds of the member agencies/bodies. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Page 7 of 7 ARTICLE VII: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Adoption and Effective Date. continued 3. This MOU shall remain in effect so long as all of the voting following membership conditions are met: (1) at least five of the following cities - Brisbane, Burlingame, Daly City, Foster City, Hillsborough, Millbrae, Pacifica, San Bruno, and South San Francisco - remain members of the Roundtable, (2) the City and County of San Francisco remains a member of the Roundtable, and (3) the County of San Mateo remains a member of the Roundtable. 4. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and any subsequent amendments to this document shall remain in effect indefinitely, (1) as long as the membership conditions of Item NO.3 of this Article are met, (2) until it is replaced or superceded by another Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), or (3) until the Roundtable is disbanded. Connie/MOU Folder/Approved MOU 04_06_05.doc 1981 AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE :M:EMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOD) AS AMENDED AMENDMENT NO.1 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 3, 1992 AMENDMENT NO.2 EFFECTIVE JULY 30, 1997 :.; - 30_? I MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOINT ACTION PLAN AND ESTABLISHING AN AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE Statement of Purpose The purpose of this agreement is to .reduce and mitigate impacts that users of San Francisco International Airport create on surrounding communities. Because the Joint Action Plan was the product of three years of cooperative effort between the Counties of San Mateo and San Francisoco with interaction. by many community and industry interests, it shall form the basis for this agreement. The six objectives of that study further define the' purpose of the agreement: Objective 1. Objecti ve 2. Objective 3. Objective 4. Obje'Ctive 5. Objective 6. Aqreement Achieve compatibility between the Airport and its Environs in the shortest amount of time and ,with the least possible cost or disruption to the Airport and affected jurisdictions. Attain a consensus between 'the Airports Commission and local governing bodies on the individual Plan Elements and achieve a balance between the costs and benefits of the proposed actions and their economic, environmental, social and institutional impacts. Provide a mechanism that provides for cooperation between the Airport and local communities in reaching decisions on planning, zoning, and building matters in local communities, while recog- nizing local governments. autonomy over those decisions. Protect and enhance existing residential neighborhoods in the vicinity of the Airport. . Provide affected Environs. jurisdictions with specific assistance to effectively deal with Airport/Envir.ons compatibility prOblems. Provide a mechanism that insures cooperation between the Airport and local communities in reaching decisions on Airport land use and management, while recognizing the Airport's authority over those decisions. Signators to this Memorandum of Understanding agree as follows: 1., 2. 3. To accept in concept and spirit the Joint Action Plan as recommended by the Joint Powers Board ~t their meeting of ~~arch 27, 1980. To work c.ooperatively to'.'Iard achi evement of Joi nt land Use Study objectives. To provide a means of achieving the reduction and the mitigati'on of impacts intended by this agreement there is hereby created a committee identified as the AIRPORT{C~MMUNITY ROUNDTABLE. 4. The functions of the AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE shall be as follows: Authority/Responsibility The Roundtable shall meet and confer on important issues involving Airport/Community impacts. Each member shall be responsible for informing and advising their parent group of the actions necessary to implement the Joint Action Plan. Fu neti ons The functions of the Roundtable shall be to: - monitor and eval.uate the progress of Joint Action Plan implementation. - provide a forum for discussion by.interested parties. - identify continuing or new problems. - discuss alternative action~. - promote cooperative acti ons by the .exercise of authority vested in the individual members. Structure The Roundtable shall be organized on a two-tier basis. The first tier s.hall be known as the Coordinating Committee and shall be composed of representatives of organizations with the authority to .act upon matters involving. implementation. The Coordinating Committee shall meet regularly at a time and place of its choosing, and shall establish procedures for operation of the Roundtable. The'second tier shall be composed of the Coordinating Committee plus interested parties and shall be known as the Integr~tive Group. The interesteD parties shall represent a broad base of community and industry concerns. The Integrative Group shall meet at a time and place designated by the Coordinating Committee. Membershi p The Coordinating Committee shall determine its own membership as \oJell as that of the Integrative Group. The initial membership of the Coordinating Committee shall be composed of a member and a designated alternate from among the following organizations which shall be invited to become members and whose membership shall be confirmed by signing this Memorandum of Understanding: City and County of San Francisco Airports Commission County of San Mateo Airport Land Use Committee City of Brisbane City of Burl i ngame City of Calma City of Daly City City of Foster City Town of Hil 1 sborough City of Mi 11 brae City of Paci fi ca City of San Bruno City of San Mateo City of South San Francisco The following organizations shall be invited to be ex-officio members: Airline Pilots' Association Air Transport Association Federal Aviation Administration Staff and Material Support The Airport's Office of Community Affairs shall provide staff support for the Roundtable. Any direct funding of Roundtable activities may be requested from and approved by the Airports Commission. S;gnator: - on. cV~ Date Approved as to form: Ke~rd:;'{€~t ~ County of San Ma tea tf/~ If I I I FRANC IS CO D~ lit I?~L USE COMM Approved as to form: Keith C. Sorenson, District Attorney County of San Mateo DATE Si gna tor: .~. ' t. / Clty of BrlSb~' Maxar 2-2'" - tf"{. Date . . . Signator: .~~ City of Burling me . ;::: ~. ~/..,./. . . A tte st: r....:: ':;-/. .. ',' ..' ':; 7f, /Vi.'{t..' 1/ J . ~: U-.7- ~ ~~.., '-Jt: - l-e_ , '/ ~ Date . .. rJ3, /75/ " . '- ". Signator: , .,., ~~-{1Q~~g:r C' y of Co ma m~ /;r, / :7),/' Date ..:. Signator: ~t{. City of Daly City ;;'/:za /? / . Date (, Signat~r: //: /~,.. ., 1/ .,- (~~, .<<C~~- , ',/ . ,.Si~~r,of Foster City , ' , I I .' l' I I I ~ . . ; , : li.'\'! [\ 1 'I.V/'; '~'~A (Att~s t t 0? ~p City Clerk Mayor c March 2, 1981 Date Signator: Date Signator: City of Mi 11 bra Mary Griffin I 'I '.,1 I,';' ( , , ./ ", \ ' February 24, 1981 Date ..: Signator: CITY OF PACI FICA $:' ~, By: n.. ..u~ . u DavidG. Finigan, City Manager M~y 13) 1981 Date The SAN BRUNO CITY COUNCIL hereby approves this Memorandum of Understanding with the express provision that in doing so it is not waiving any right the CITY or the AIRPORT COMPATI.BILITY AUTHORITY may have to enforce mitigation measur~s with respect to operations at San Francisco International Airport which are not included within the recommendations of the Joint Action Plan, or are expressly not recommended by such Plan. (MARCH 9, 1981 COUNCIL MINUTE ORDER) SAN -. Dated: March 10, 1981 ATTEST: ~~~ o2~</~/t~ erri Rasmussen, City Cler MOTION Made by: Councilwoman Teglia Seconded by:. Councilman Addiego The SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL hereby approves thi s t~emorandum of Understanding with the expreis provision that in doing so it is not waiving any ri ght the CITY or the AIRPORT CDt4PATABILITY AUTHORITY may have to ;.. propose and/or enforce mitigation mea5ures with respect to operations at San Francisco Internation~l Airport which are not included within the recommenda ti ons of the Joi nt Acti on Pl an, or Joi nt Land Use Study Qir are expressly not recommended by such Plan and/or such'Study. (MARCH 18,1981 COUNCIL MINUTE ORDER) Dated: March 19, 1981 /s/ Ronald G. Acosta Ronald G. Acosta, Mayor CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO =.;~TTES1.: /sl Barbara A. Battava Barbara A. Battaya, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COU~:i'l' OF ~.N I.I,Ai:O SS. I. B~rb..r~ A. B.:rtte':A. Cill' Cl~r of the city ~ :S=~!l Saft mn- cis==. CouJ:fy or S.:an t.~..b=~. 5:a~ 0: C:!ii:'l:lrnia. 6ft e:l~,:fi=i:l C1er~ or I~~ ell' C::Il::i: I!:e,..."r. :i~ ".-~!:Iv ce....iiy thilt the ~!::",ve aad fore- 90'''9 ;s a Ia:!I, trc,: .n::l car.'~:t e=;:; of l-Mart_b.J.b.._1981 ~.9unci 1 Mi nute i BOOK Order. th= o:i;ir.,..1I. 0: "":t:,:,. i.; C~ !::~ in r:r Q::i,,:~:, .erHi th~: J h~ve are:uUy c.Cl.m:':1t~~ ;oi'=' ~~~: w.I:~ .~: ':'::;;:O.1t. '1 'IN Wri';<.fS~"':"HERECF'1 ;'Dve i:o<=unto .'=1 ,..., h.~:! An:! the ...~I or . .' J Ih. C:~, ci 5':Ulll Sl>~ ~,,~.:;'c~ ~h:,-JO.th:~ c!.Ap~ ,,8L. . : 61'.,;';:\:.,., A. :.\TTA Y." I C;;.'y ~';"., .~rl E,.<>'i::ic c.." oi t!:c C;ty C=~r..:1 c; the Ciry oj l 5=~1' :~n ~<:~::;,=c ~~ / /, j),....-.... B'~-4.._t,'I..~~ 'I e.; . . -'---. Co; ,'; C;~rt {J J - .... ""'" . . .. Oc_u., _II, C.::,,; 1992 AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOD) AMENDMENT NO.1 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 3, 1992 OCTOBER 23~ 1992 EXEIBIT4 AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THJi, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOINT ACTION PLAN AND ESTABLISHING.AN AiRPoRT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO TEE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING creating the Airport/Community Roundtable ("Roundtable") entered into by. the County of San Mateo, 9 participating cities located near San Francisco Airport ("Cities"), the City and County of San Francisco, and its Airport Commission (" Commission "). RECITALa 1. On or about May 11, 1981, local governing bodies and the Commission entered a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Acceptance of the Joint Action Plan and' Establishing an Airport/Community Roundtable ("MOU"). The Roundtable is a committee formed by the MOD to develop joint action plans and to w01;'k cooperatively in resolving issues concerning the San Francisco International Airport and its environs. The members of the . . '. Roundtable and the Commission reaffirm in concept and spirit the Joint Action Plan which waS attached to the original MOU and agree to work cooperatively tOward achievement of the Joint Land Use Study Objectives sta~ in ~at Pian. 2. In addition to the Joint Action Plan ~reated by the original MOU~' the Roundtable has in the past given on-going consideration and study to the concern over aircraft noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the Airport.. 3. Commission is presently considering the adoption of a San Francisco International Airport Final Draft Master Plan ("Master Plax: If) and an Environmental Impact Rf::port ("EIR") I for the project. The Master Plan provides for the expansion, .consolidation, remodeling, and implementation of significant changes in Airport facilities over the period 1986 through 2006. 4. The EIR identifies a number of environmental impacts and proposes certain measures. The local government members of the Roundtable contend that the measures for aircraft noise impacts should be enhanced. Commission disputes this contentio~, but is willing to cooperate with the Roundtable to address these concerns. THEREFORE, .in order to resolvetli~ differences,: the members of the Airport/Community Roundtable agree to amend the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Acceptance of the Joint Action Plan and Establishing an Airport! Community Roundtable to add the following additional Joint War!; Plan and Implementation concerning the aircraft noise- impacts that are identified iri the EIR to the Airport Master Plan: 1. DEVELOPMENT OF JOJNT WORK PLAN To mitigate the noise-related impacts of the Aitport, Commission shall develop with the Roundtable a Joint Work Plan each year on the noise-related issues. These' issues include but are not limited to those topi.cs listed in Attachment 1. Co~mission shill also provide - - - . fundmg to the Roundtable in the amount of $100,000 per year, for the years 1993 through 2000, to support the Roundtable's effortS in' a.ddressing the noise related measures ident~ed in t~~ annual Joint Work Plan. 2. IM:PLEMENTATION OF OPERATING PROCEDURES Based on analysis and discus.sion resulting from the Joint Work Plan, the Commission and the Roundtable shalljointly identify Airport/aircraft operating procedures which Commission shall implement, as soon as practical, to reduce aircraft noise. If identified actions or procedures are beyond the scope and authorgy of the Commission to implement, the or procedures are beyond the scope and authority of the Commission to implement, the Commission shall request and support the appropriate agencies to implement such actions as soon as practical. 3. FUNDING FOR NOISE INSULA nON The Airports Director shall recommend that the CommissioQ. include a section in the Final Mitigation Program related to noise insulation to provide that the Airports Comniission -, ~ shall guarantee to spend up to $120 million for noise insulation in the cities surrounding the Airport per the terms shown in Exhibit 1. 4. INCLUSION IN MASTER PLAN This terms of this Memorandum of U nd~rstanding and its attachments shall be . included as a condition 'of approval of the :Master Plan by Commission. s. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT This Ameridment shall be effective upon execution by all parties who are official members of the Roundtable. The Amendment shall terminate upon mutual agreement of the parties ~ 6. OTHER PROVISIONS This Amendment is hereby incorporated and made a part of the origiual_ agreement and is subject to all provisions therein. All other provisions of the original MOU remain " unchanged and fully effective. 7. ATTAC~NTS The following dOCument' is attached to and are part of this Amendment: . Attachment 1 - Joint Work Plan . . . . . rn WITNEsS WHEREOF, Commission and other members of Roundtabl~~ have caused this Amendm~t to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates shown below. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts. Date CURT HOLZINGER CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' REPRESENTATIVE. Date TOM HAYES CITY AND COUN'fY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR'S OFFICE Date LOUIS TURPEN CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN F'RANcrsco AIRPORTS COMMISSION Date MARY GRIFFrn, SUPERV1S0R. GOUNTY OF SAN MATEO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Date HERBERT FOREMAN C/CAG AIRPORT LA:N'D USE COM:MITrEE (ALUC) Dated : A TrEST: . Clerk of City Council Dated: ATTEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: ATIEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: - ATrEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: A TrEST: Clerk of City Council CITY OF BRISBANE BY Mayor CITY OF BURLINGAME BY Mayor CITY OF DALY CITY BY Mayor CITY OF FOSTER CITY BY Mayor CITY OF HILLSBOROUGH BY Mayor . .. .. . .' Dated: AITEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: AITEST: : . Clerk of City Council Dated: A'ITEST: Clerk of ..City Council . Dated: ATTEST: Clerk of the Council ~ 31/CCACiMlT .AIR l0n:2J92 CITY OF MILLBRAE BY Mayor CITY OF PACIFICA BY Mayor CITY OF SAN BRUNO BY . ........ Mayor CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BY Mayor OCTOBER 23, 199 EXHIBIT 4 - ATTACHMENT 1 JOINT WORK PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the Joint Work Plan between the Airports Commission and the Airport/Community Roundtable is to identify and implement actions and procedures to mitigate. aircraft noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at San Francisco Internation~l Airport. GOAL/OBJECTIVES I . " The goal of the Jofnt Work Plan .is to implement appropriateactians to reduce aircraft noise impac~s .;n the Airport environs communities resulting from the San Francfsco International Ai rport. The objectives of the Joint Work Plan are as follows: 1. Develop and implement additional air traffic procedures to reduce aircraft noise and overflight in communities near the Airport. 2. Revise existing Airport noise abatement regulations to improve enforcement of noise mitigations. _. 3. Expand .the existing. A.irport Noise Management Plan to improve noisl: management capability. 4. Implement and evaluate a test program to reduce low frequency, bal:kblast noise in affected communities. . 5. Monitor the progress and implementation of th~ Joint Work Plan actions to evaluate the performance of noise mitigation efforts and to. assurl: achievement. of the ~tated goal. .: TOPICS/ISSUES The Airports Commission and the Airport/Conununity Roundtable will discuss and analyze the items listed below to ascertain the need for action on, and, if action is appropriate; to determine implementation by the appropriate agencY(ies). Such list may be amended at any time by mutual agreement. Airoort/Aircraft Operation Procedures A. AirQualitv 1. Air quality impacts in the Airport environs area of existing and future airport ?perations. EXHIBIT 4 - ATTACHMENT 1 JO HIT WORK PLAN Page 2 AirportfAircraft Operatinq Procedures - continued B. Navioational Aids 1. Inst~llation arid capabili.ties of a Localizer-type Direction,al Aid/Distance Measuring Equipment (LDAfDME) to reduce or eliminate overflights of communities in all weather conditions and tim~ periods. \ 2. Installation and capabilities of a Microwave 'Landing System (MLS) to ~ revise flight patterns and procedures to lessen noise impacts on Airport envir:ons cities... . . C. Noise Measurement/Noise Manaoement L Development of a local single-event noise metric and a repor"ting system. 2. Expansion of the Airport's proactive noise management progrc~i through j ncreased use of the Ai rport' s PA~SUR System. . 3 ~ Reducti on of backbl ast n.oi se from Runways 01 departures to mitigate the impacts. of recent increases in .the use of Runwajs 01 and the anticipated impacts' of the growth in air traffic as forecast:;n the Master Plan. Specifically: (a) Increase the use. of correctly floWn Runways 28 Shoreline. departures and the nighttime use of Runw~ys 10 for departures. (b) Evaluate the results of the May 1992 RunwaYf 01 test pr'ogram and implement effective. options. (c) Implementation of the effe~ctive results of the backblast noise test program (see page 3).- 4. Reduction of nighttime and e'arly morning arrivals and departures. 5. Reduction of the Airports Commission's maximum sideline noise limit of 103 EPNdB to a lower limit by December 31, 1993. 6. Revisions to the existing San Francisco International Airport Noise Abatement Regulation to. enforce noise mitigations. D. Runway Ooerations .1. Deactivation of Runways 01 at night, between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7: 00 a. m. 2. Prohibition of Stage 2 aircraft op~rations at night. .. ., ., lHIBrr'4 - ATTACHMENT 1 JOINT. WORK PLAN Page 3 Airoort/Aircraft OoeratinQ Procedures - continued D. Runwav Ooeratirins - continued u 3. Enfor.cement of the Roundtable and Airports Commission policy of not snifting noise from one. community to another. 4. . Elimination of shortcutting from Woodsi"de to the Outer Marker and designation of the high span approach as a noise abatement procedure to reduce the Tipp"Toe approach procedure for single-stream arrivals. 5. On implementation of the LDA/DME, utilize the high span with the LDA/DME for side-by-side procedures. 6. Education of domestic and international flight crews and air carriers of noise mitigation programs and procedures. E. Other Items Suooested bv the Public and Supported bv the Roundtable 1. Use of sound enclosures for all runups; prohibition of runups at boarding gates. 2. Compliance with the State Noise Standards to eliminate the need for a variance. N Backblast Noise Test ProQram The Commission and the Roundtable will implement a pilot program tC) test the effectiveness of sQund insulation measures to reduce law ftequency, backblast noise in affected communities". Commission wil] provid~ 'the total 'funding for the pilot program.:, Eligibility and acoustic c~iteria f.or t~e program will be joint developed. . The Roundtable will evaluate the results of the pilot program. If the. pilot program ;s successful, the Commission will continue to provide funding for the program to participating cities. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOINT WORK PLAN This Joint Work'Plan will be implemented over a mutually agreed time period. DFC:kcd - DFCC2463.AKA 1997 AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOD) AMENDMENT NO.2 EFFECTIVE JULY 30, 1997 . APR-28-1997 10: 50 COUNTY COUNSEL SMCo. 41 5 363 4la3..:1 P . l3la21"'81216 AMENDMENT No.2 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UND~RSTANDING REGARDrNG ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOINT ACTION PLAN AND ESTABLISHING AN AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE THiS IS AMENDMENT No. 2 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING creating the Airport/Community Roundtable ("Roundtable") entered into by the County of San , Mait'o, 11 participating cities located near San Francisco Airport e'Cities"), the Ci.ty and Cou4ty of Sun Francisco, and its Airport Commission ("'Commission") BEClIaLS 1. 0 n or about May 11, 1981, local governing bodies and the Commission entered a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Acceptance of the Joint Actiot1 Plan and Establishfng an Airport/Community Roundtable ("'MOU"). The Roundtable is a comm.ittee formed by ~e MOU to develop joint action plans and to work cooperati vely in resolving issues conccming the San Francisco International Airport and its environs. 2. In addition to the Joint Action Plan created by the original MOU, the Roundtabile ; gives on-going consideration and study to the concern over aircraft noise impacts resulting from aircrm operations at the Airport. 3. Certain cities in South San 1v!a.teo County have expressed interest in joining tho Roundtable in order to participate in developing and implementmg air traffic control proc:edur~s and in addressing aircraft and Airpo~ operation procedures to reduce SircI-ait Doise. 4. TIle Rc)undtable has determined that its purpose of providing a forum to address noi~e issues would be served by allowing all ci ties in San Mateo County, regardl ess of noise levels or treatment under Title 21, Chapter Six, of the: California Code of Regulations, the: opponunity to' fully participate in the Roundtable. HPR-2~-1997 10:50 COUNTY COUNSEL SMCo. 415 363 403,~ P. 003/006 5. The Roundtable adopted Resolution 93-01 on Dec~mber 9. 1993 to memoralize its longstanding policy of not shifting noise from one community to another when re!atl:d to aircraft: operations at San Francisco International .Airport. The Roundtable will continue to adhere to the policy's set forth in Resolution 93-01. THEREFORE, the: current members of the AirportlCommuni~ Roundtable agIee to amend the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Acceptance of the Joint Action Plan and Establishing an Airport/Community Roundtable, as previously amended, as follows: L REPRRSRNT A TrVE OF CITIES TN SAN MA TRO CO TJNTY NOT CURRENTLY VOTING MEM"RERS .Any city in San Mateo County that is not currently a voting member of the ROWldtable may elect to become a voting member of the Roundtable atany time by adopting a resolution:, (1) authorizing a member of the citycouncil'to represent the city on the Roundtable; (2) agreeing , . to comply with the original MOU and Amendment No" 1 to the MOU; nnd (3) agreeing to contribute allIlual funding to the Roundtable in the same amount as a current City memtx::r contributes (currently $1,000 per year), or such additional. annual funding as may be recommended by the Roundtable:. The city may designate an alternate member, to represent the city'on the Roundtable, who must also be a member ofllie city counciL Any city or other voting member of the Roundtable, whether currently a member or electing f6become a member under this section, may elect not to contribute annual funding to the Roundtable and, by such d,ectioI?- shall lose its voting membership on the Roundtable. ,..."-,,,-,C-.I.';:I,::!( l~::::>l2l COUNTY COUNSEL SMCo. 415 363 403~ P.004/806 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT This Amendment shall be efl:ective upon execution by a majority of the parties who arc current voting members of the Roundtable. 3. OTHRR PROVISIONS This Amendment is hereby incorporated and made a part of the original agreemc:nt and is subject to all provisions therein. All other provisions of the original MOU and Amendment N9. 1 remain unchanged and fully effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Roundtable have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates shown below; Thls Arnel1dment may be signed in counterparts. Date CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Date CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCrSCO AIRPORTS COMMISSION Date COUNTY OF SAN MATEO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dated: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMITTEE '"'\I "-.c.";" - .L ='='" I J.t:J. ::>J. ,-UUN I r ,-UU/'/::'/;:L :,/'lCo. 415 363 4034 P.005~00S Dated: A lTEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: A nEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: A TrEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: ATTEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: A TrEST: Clerk of City Council CITY OF BRISBANE BY Mayor CITY OF BURLINGAM:E BY Mayor CITY OF DALY CITY BY Mayor CITY OF FOSTER CITY BY Mayor TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH BY --- Mayor Daled: A"I TEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: A TrEST: Clerk of City Council Dated: ArrEST: Clerk of City Council. Dated: A'fTEST: Clerk of City Council K:\C Ot~r'T~"\C;CA.Ci\A.M2MOU. Aprii :lB. 1997 ".I.;'> ..)0.;) 4~,j.:! I-' . ~~b~b CITY OF MILLBRAE BY Mayor CITY OF PACIFICA BY MayeJr CITY OF SAN BRUNO BY Mayor CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BY Mayor MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL. AIRPORT/COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE April 2005 ROUNDTABLE MEMBER AGENCY SIGNATURE PAGE Roundtable Member Aaency: City of South San Francisco Roundtable Representative: Raymond Green AGENCY SIGNATOR: Honorable Raymond Green, Mayor Date 7/612005 Connie FolderlMOU/Signalure Pages. doc ~'t\\ s~ ~g . Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #5 DA TE: July 27, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INST ALLA TION OF STOP SIGNS ON RAILROAD A VENUE AT MAGNOLIA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the installation of stop signs on Railroad A venue at Magnolia A venue. BACKGROUND/DISCDSSION: On May 23,2005, staff received a request for installation of stop signs on Railroad A venue at Magnolia A venue. This intersection is a "T" configuration with Magnolia A venue running in the: north/south direction and Railroad A venue in the eastiwest direction. There is a private driveway for the Basque Cultural Center on the south side of the intersection opposite Magnolia A venue, which generates high vehicular volume entering and exiting. Currently, there is a stop sign on Magnolia A venue and no stop signs on Railroad A venue. Vehicles on Magnolia A venue yield to traffic on Railroad A venue, with free flow of traffic on Railroad A venue. The Traffic Advisory Committee (T AC) reviewed this request at its June meeting and determined this intersection meets the City's guidelines for stop sign installation by petition since this location is the intersection of two local roads. The City's stop sign policy allows that if the majority of residents living within a 300-foot radius of the intersection of two local roads agree to the stop installation by signing a petition, the City will install the requested stop signs upon receipt of the petition and Council approval. Before the resident could obtain the petition, another accident occurred at the subject intersection on July 1,2005. Based on engineering judgment and in order to increase public safety at this intersection, it is recommended that the City Council approve the installation of stop signs on Railroad A venue at Magnolia Avenue. Please refer to Exhibit 1 as it displays the existing condition and the proposed recommendation for the installation of the stop signs. Staff Report Subject: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INST ALLA TION OF STOP SIGNS ON RAILROAD A VENUE AT MAGNOLIA Page 2 of2 FUNDING: No additional funding would be necessary to install the stop signs at this location. The stop sign and pole are in stock with the Street Maintenance Division and the time used to install the sign and pavement markings would be charged to general street maintenance. By: Approved: ) Marty Van Duyn Assistant City M Attachments: Resolution Location Map - Exhibit 1 RESOLUTION NO. 39-2002 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS ON RAILROAD AVENUE AT MAGNOLIA AVENUE WHEREAS, on May 23, 2005, staff received a request for the installation of stop signs at the intersection of Railroad A venue and Magnolia A venue; and WHEREAS, the Traffic Advisory Committee ("T AC") reviewed the request at its June meeting and determined that the intersection in question meets the City's guidelines for the installation of stop signs by petition; and WHEREAS, since review by the T AC, another accident occurred at the subject intersection; and WHEREAS, no additional funding is required to complete the installation, as the required stop sign and support pole are in stock with the Street Maintenance Division and time used shall be charged to general street maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council approves the installation of stop signs on Railroad A venue at Magnolia Avenue. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk MAGNOLIA AVE. (f) --l o lJ ~~ w :) Z W > <( o <( o 0::: -1 <( 0::: EXISTING EXHIBIT 1 ~z NEW INSTALLATION BASQUE CULTURAL CENTER DRIVEWAY MAGNOLIA AVE. PROPOSED ...I- R1= STANDARD 36" STOP SIGN MOUNTED ON A 2" DIA. POLE ....L. W17= STANDARD 36" STOP AHEAD SYMBOL SIGN MOUNTED ON A 2" DIA. POLE w :) Z W > <( o <( o 0::: -1 <( 0::: RAILROAD AVENUE AT MAGNOLIA AVENUE AGENDA ITEM #6 DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION UPGRADE PROJECT PROJECT NO. 51-13232-0321 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the Common Greens Irrigation Upgrade Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This project upgraded 1200 feet of existing irrigation piping, associated valves and hardware in the Common Greens area that was approximately 30 years old and required constant maintenance. It included a new water management system which can monitor water usage, leaks and be responsive to weather conditions. It can be programmed from a central computer and it can shut itself off and send notification if there is a problem. The upgraded irrigation area is bordered by Callan Boulevard, Duhallow Way, Carter Drive and Tyrone Court and includes Erris Court, and Sean Court. FUNDING: This project was completed with Common Green assessment funds at a total cost of $57,538.00. There was adequate funding for the project. ~,,/ By: "-.../' Terry White Director of APprovd.y '- C ~J rry M. Na City Manager RTH/ TW i-S ~~"\r- = o 01;; / ~. ~ ~0Q'Y '~ O~' / )-~~ 0A O"%r;Y' . '0'<::>.' ~~~4 i~ . /<>~~~p~\ ~ <) . ~?# ~o"o~ <) ~~ ~'O~ A 0 ~ ~~~..~ AW<0 6~ ~~ %6b'-t>~') ~.~...' -t>~}: W(/ ~~> ' ~~// ~... .^"~ \".",,^^,.r.-r" \\~ \ 'if, \~ \\~ ~ \Q \.~ \ "'""nn ~""""o =nH1!:: ~>Z!:: -i::!V'lO o z z CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC WORKS OEPAR 315 MAPLE AVENUE ~:~:J S"AENGINEERING OIVISION , N FRANCISCO, CA 940BO --~ ~'t\\ sM (~~, t:i <") v c ~lIFO"~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #7 DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (BAAQMD) FOR FUNDS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City to submit application to the Bay Area Air Quality Manageme~t District (BAAQMD) for $88,200 to reduce emissions from eight (8) South San Francisco Scavenger Company Solid Waste Collection Vehicles (SWCV). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: For fiscal years 2005 thru 2006, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) has $10,000,000 in Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Regional Funds to provide incentives to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOC) and particulate matter (PM) from heavy vehicles including Solid Waste Collection Vehicles (SWCV) that are subject to the California Air Resources Board regulation. All incentive applications must be submitted to the Air District by public agencies located within the boundaries of the Air District. A public agency may apply for incentive funds on behalf of a private SWCV fleet if the public agency has a franchise agreement with the owner/operator of that SWCV fleet to provide solid waste collection within its jurisdiction. The public agency assumes numerous responsibilities: To serve as the formal project applicant. To submit a Resolution adopted by its governing board (i.e, City Council). To enter into an incentive funding agreement with the Air District. To transmit the incentive funds to the private SWCV fleet. To ensure that the SWCV fleet complies with the contractual terms of the incentive funding agreement. To monitor the operational status of the equipment that is purchased with Air District incentive funds, and to report any change in operational status within 30 calendar days. Staff Report Subject: Request for BAAQMD Funding Page 2 The Air District will evaluate the applications and issue an award letter and incentive letter (if funds are available) after ranking all the projects. The application was submitted on June 30, 2005 and to complete the process, a Council resolution must be forwarded by July 30, 2005. Council previously approved 4 units to be installed in January 2005 at a cost of $44,100. CONCLUSION Successful application for and receipt of this funding will allow South San Francisco Scavenger to retrofit eight of its existing SWCV s with the Cleaire Longview device that is designed to reduce Particulate Matter by 85% and Nitrogen Oxide emissions by 25%. This is an important step toward reducing harmful emissions affecting our region overall. FUNDING The City of South San Francisco serving as the Project Sponsor will submit invoices to the BAAQMD for reimbursement of the cost of retrofitting the eight vehicies in the South San Francisco Scavenger fleet identified in the initial application. The cost of retrofitting each vehicle is $10,500 for a total of$84,000. This funding will then be passed on to the Scavenger Company to cover their expenses for the retrofit as the work is completed. The City is eligible for up to $4,200 in Administrative costs to serve as the monitoring agency for this project, making the total request $88,200. There is no ongoing financial obligation for the City in approving this project. B~ Terry Whitf Director of Approved: Attachments: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ST ATE OF CALiFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR FUNDS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLES AND AUTHORIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAME, IF THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED BY THE BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, California Air Resources Board has adopted a new regulation that applies to public and private owners of solid waste collection vehicles (SWCVs) that perform res.idential and commercial solid waste collection. WHEREAS, the regulation requires fleet owners to employ Best Available Control Technology (BACT) to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) from SWCV s. WHEREAS, the regulation does not require any reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) emISSIons. WHEREAS, NOx emissions are a major component of ozone, a colorless, odorless gas that is injurious to human health when breathed. 'WHEREAS, in the absence of incentive funding, it is expected that most fleets subject to the regulation will comply with the minimum baseline requirements to reduce PM emiss.ions only and will not choose to exceed the requirements for diesel PM reduction nor choose to reduce any NOx emissions, WHEREAS, Bay Area Air Quality Management District ("Bay Area Air District") has allocated funding from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air to assist refuse fleets in choosing rule compliance strategies that reduce emissions beyond the requirements of the rule. WHEREAS, local government agencies within the jurisdiction of the Bay Area air District are eligible to receive these funds on behalf of the SWCV fleets that they own or that they hold under contract to perform solid waste collection. WHEREAS, City of South San Francisco desires to participate in the SWCV incentive program. WHEREAS, City of South San Francisco desires to encourage SWCV fleets under contract to the City to reduce emissions beyond the requirements of the rule. WHEREAS, City of South San Francisco desires to apply to the Bay Area Air District for funding in response to the opportunity provided by the Bay Area Air District. WHEREAS, City of South San Francisco desires to enter into a contract with the Bay Area Air District to allow for expenses incurred by a contracted SWCV fleet to be reimbursed by the Bay Area Air District to the City. WHEREAS, City of South San Francisco understands that it will need to enter into a contract with the contracted SWCV fleet in order to allow for expenses incurred by the contracted SWCV fleet to be reimbursed by the City to the SWCV fleet. WHEREAS, the governing body of the local government agency must adopt a resolution to approve the submittal of an application for SWCV incentive funds by the agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council is hereby authorized to execute a funding agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District for the purposes described above if said applications is approved by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. I, Sylvia Payne City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk ~ - ~ 't \l S:1.<Y S c 0 >- c;; ~ C"') v 0 C4l~\~ S taft Report AGENDA ITEM #8 DATE: July 27,2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Valerie Sommer, Library Director SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT $28,233 IN GRANT FUNDING TO SUPPORT THE LIBRARY'S ARTISTS IN THE MIDDLE, READER LEADER AND SUMMER READING CLUB PROGRAMS AND AMEND THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT'S 200512006 OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $200 grant from the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Lodge 2091 and $500 in donations to support the Library's Reader Leader and Summer Reading Club programs and a $27,533 grant from the California State Library to support the Artists in the Middle program and amending the Library Department's operating budget for fiscal year 200512006. BACKGROUND: The Library has been awarded a Library Services and Technology Act (LST A) grant by the California State Library in the amount of $27,533 to support the Library's new Artists in the Middle (AIM) project. AIM is a program for students in 6th through 8th grades that addresses the needs of middle school students for engaging, positive activities after school. AIM will offer a series of workshops for teens on topics such as Comedy Improvisation, Cartooning, and Poetry-writing. Instructors will lead a series of workshops on a specific discipline over a period of 4 to 8 weeks, with a culminating performance or exhibit. The Library has received $200 from the Elks Lodge 2091 and $500 in donations from Library supporters to fund the Children's Services' Reader Leader and Summer Reading Club programs. The Reader Leader program enables 6th to 12th graders to assist elementary school children in practicing reading skills and the Summer Reading Club encourages children to read during the school break:. FUNDING: The funds will be used to amend this year's operating budget of the Library Department. Funds not expended at the end of fiscal year 200512006 will be carried over into fiscal year 200612007. Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing support after the close of the funding cycles. By: V~k Valerie Sommer Library Director APprovd.'1 ~ cp B M. Nagel City Manager RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEYfANCE OF $28,233 IN GRANT FUNDING TO SUPPORT THE LIBRARY'S ARTISTS IN THE MIDDLE, READER LEADER, AND SUMMER READING CLUB PROGRAMS AND AMEND THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT'S 2005/2006 OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, staff recommends the acceptance of $27,533 in Library Services and Technology Act grant funding from the California State Library, $200 from the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Lodge 2091, and $500 from Library patrons to support Library programming; and WHEREAS, the funds will be used to amend this year's operating budget of the Library Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby accepts $27,533 from the California State Library to support the Library's new Artists in the Middle program and $200 from the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Lodge 2091 and $500 from Library patrons to support the Reader Leader and Summer Reading Club programs and amends the 2005-2006 Operating Budget to add $28,233 to the Library Department's budget. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the__day of _ 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ArrEST: City Clerk AGENDA ITEM #9 DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RATE STRUCTURE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a resolution establishing Stormwater Management Program charges for the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year. It is also recommended that Council adopt by resolution the Finance Director's Report on Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Stormwater Management Service Fees. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Introduction The 2005-2006 Fiscal Year marks the thirteenth year of South San Francisco's participation in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program mandated by Federal and State Governments. The program's current fee structure was adopted by Council on July 19, 1995, and represents an equitable distribution of costs taking into consideration the size and use of the parcel, and the estimated amount of stormwater runoff generated by the parcel. This fee calculation strategy is similar to the process used by other stormwater management programs, including the San Mateo County General Program. By direction of the City Council, stormwater program charges are to be adjusted so as not to exceed actual program expenses, The proposed stormwater program charges herein were developed in response to Council's direction and are the same charges as the prior year. Regulations The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandated local government to control and reduce stormwater pollution runoff. The framework for regulating stormwater discharges is through a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES). The permit is implemented and enforced by the State Water Resources Control Board through its regional agency. Staff Report Subject: Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Page 2 South San Francisco, in cooperation with the other jurisdictions in San Mateo County, jointly reapplied for their Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit on March 18, 1998. A requirement of the NPDES permit was the development of a five-year action plan, known as the Stormwater Management Plan. The Plan covers the period from July 1998 through June 2003 to prevent and control stormwater pollution in San Mateo County. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP) initial Stormwater Management Plan covered the previous five-year period. The Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) contains two-year work plans with budgets that describe in more detail how the General Program's portion of the five-year SWMP will be completed. The two-year work plans and budgets will be updated annually to include the subsequent fiscal year and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) each March. The SWMP also contains detailed performance standards that identify what each member agency is committed to do to control the discharge of stormwater pollutants to the storm drains and conveyance systems that it owns and/or operates. STOPPP will review these performance standards every two years and revise them as needed. New and modified performance standards will be incorporated following the approval process described in the reissued NPDES permit. Examples of General Program responsibilities include: . Coordinating the overall program efforts' . Submitting consolidated quarterly, semi-annual, and annual reports to the Regional Water Quality Control Board; . Develop and sponsor training workshops; . Develop educational/informational materials for dissemination within jurisdictions. Examples of City Specific Program activities include: . Street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, and other maintenance related activities that may have an impact on stormwater quality; . Minimize or eliminate potential stormwater pollution sources at commercial and industrial facilities through inspection and educational outreach activities, and to effectively prohibit illicit discharges (such as oil, paint, or soapy washwater) to the municipalities' storm drain systems; . Educating the public about the differences between the sanitary sewer and storm drain systems and the causes of stormwater pollution in order to encourage residents to adopt less polluting and more environmentally beneficial practices; . Prohibiting non-stormwater discharges from construction sites, reducing stormwater pollutant discharges from new development and construction activities to the maximum extent practicable, and requiring compliance with stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) and erosion/sedimentation control at construction sites; Staff Report Subject: Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Page 3 . IdentifYing effective BMP' s and developing tools and analyzing information needed to identify and help solve creek drainage, basin-specific water quality and beneficial use impairment problems. South San Francisco Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Program Accomplishments . Responded to 40 various spill or illicit discharge complaints (i.e. paint, oil, fuel, or concrete materials) that could enter into the storm drains; . Reviewed 81 building and construction plans arid prepared written comments requesting incorporation of stormwater pollution prevention measures and post construction measures; . SSF Staff participated with the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Program in staffing the booth at the San Mateo County Fair which was held August 2004; . On September 18,2004, the City of South San Francisco's Stormwater Program, along with the Water Quality Control Plant participated in the City's Annual Day in the Park. . On Saturday, October 2, 2004, the City of South San Francisco's Beautification Committee sponsored a Creek Clean-Up Event at a site behind Utah and Littlefield Aves. This was a two- hour event with over 40 volunteers, including staff and community volunteers, picking up debris and trash. . The Office of Environmental Compliance continued its School Outreach Program to 4th grade students by providing 18 presentations since July 2004. . The Office of Environmental Compliance presented Sewer Science to 3 high school classes at EI Camino High during the week of April 25, 2005. Sewer Science is a wastewater treatment lab for high school students. SUMMARY The proposed program budget for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 is $747,293. Funding will be provided from program service fees and carry-over funds from the previous fiscal year. A breakdown of the program fees, according to classification type can be seen in Exhibit A. This assessment is collected by the San Mateo County Assessor via property tax billings as in the previous year. The deadline to place the stormwater program assessment on the tax rolls is August 5, 2005. Staff Report Subject: Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Page 4 ~_ r .! ~.'. B~:!t. J:::: Terry Wh' e Director 0 ubhc Works Approved: ~~ ' ~) . Nagel City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Approving Stormwater Management Service Charges (Exhibit A to Resolution) Resolution Adopting Report of Storm water Management Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Report of Stormwater Management Services Charges for 2005-2006. CP/TW RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SERVICE CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 14,04 enables the City to levy charges for the local portion of the San Mateo County Storm water Management Program; and WHEREAS, notices were published and a public hearing was held on July 27, 2005 as required for the enactment of the subject stormwater fees; and WHEREAS, funding for the local program requires $747,293; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Service Charges are maintained at the level established in Fiscal Year 1997-98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco as follows: 1. The City Council hereby confirms the Storm water Management Service Charge formula attached hereto as Exhibit A, for Fiscal Year 2005-2006. * ~ T * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the __ day of July, 2005 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHARGES FOR FY 2005-2006 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco on Wednesday, the 27nd of July 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the Community Room of the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California, will consider the adoption of Storm water Management Program Fees for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 pursuant to Chapter ]4.04 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, and any, and all interested persons may appear and be heard thereon. The following formula, proposed for adoption, shall be used to calculate stormwater service fees for each parcel: PARCEL SIZE -0- BASE THRESHOLD x (sq. footage) (average sq. ft. of single family dwelling) EDU RATE (per class) ANNUAL SERVICE FEE [number of EDU's] Sample Fees per Ciassification: Type of Parcels Annual Rate 1. Single Family Residential 5,400 sq.ft. -0- 5,352 sq.ft. (base) [] EDU] x $ 8.72 $ 8.72 3. Multi-Family Residential ]0,700 sq.ft. -0- 5,352 sq.ft. (base) [ 2 EDU's] Com merciallInd ustrial (a) 20,000 sq.ft -0- 5,352 sq.f1. (base) [ 3.73 EDU's] x $ ]7.42 $ 34.84 2. x $ 17.86 $ 66.74 (b) 43,560 sq,ft. (] acre) -0- 5,352 sq,ft. (base) x [8.13 EDD's] $ ] 7.86 $ 145,36 4. Vacant ]0,000 sq.ft. -0- 5,352 sq.ft. (base) [2 EDU's] x $ 1.74 $ 3.26 5, Parking Lots ] 0,000 sq. ft. 5,352 sq. f1. (base) x $ 26.14 $ 48.84 The actual per parcel Storm water Program Fees scheduled for adoption will be available for review in the City Clerk's Office. Questions concerning Storm water Program Fees should be directed to the Interim Environmental Compliance Coordinator, Water Quality Control Division, Department of Public Works (650) 829-3840. Date: Sylvia Payne City Clerk City of South San Francisco RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REPORT OF STORMV/ A TER MANAGEMENT SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 PURSUANT TO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 14.04.110 WHEREAS, the City Council has given notice and on July 27, 2005, held a public hearing as required by law on the subject stormwater rates;and WHEREAS, the rates imposed and reflected in the Report of Stormwater Management Services Fee for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 are the same as the unit rates imposed in Fiscal Year 2004-2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, by a minimum two- thirds vote, hereby adopts the Report of Stormwater Management Services Fee for Fiscal Year 2005-2006, and directs that the rates so established shall be collected on the official tax assessment roll, together \vith real propert'j taxes, and that the amount shall constitute liens upon the properties which shall be effective at the same time and to the same extent as is provided for by law in the case of real property taxes, with like penalties for delinquencies. * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the __ day of , 2005 by the following vote, AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk ~""""=-~'-""""''''' ........._......,.. ~......""._."""""""" !l;UQ;..-=-o ~-~=!~~~~,_~~'.';l.:t~"""""IJ'BB:I".......'Ei. .., ......-;:~ REPORT OF STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SERVICES CHARGES FOR 2005-2006 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 14.04 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIP AL CODE J"...~........................,....,...... =-- --=-."'~ ... - -- ,","",,1_~W';tO=>........._- In accordance with Chapter 14.04 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, the following rep0l1 prepared as of June 08, 2005 is submitted. This report describes the procedure for charging those parcels of real property, which receive benefits of stormwater system services, and the amount of the annual charge, which will be imposed against each parcel for fiscal year 2005-2006. Summary of Charges All single-family residential properties $123,481.02 All multi-family residential properties (Including duplexes) $ 56,926.08 All commerciallindustrial $212,873.46 Parking lots $ 11,328.86 Vacant $ 6,792.16 TOTAL <1'A11 An1 co .jl"-tll,"-tVl..JO This report refers to and incorporates by reference the report entitled "Notice of Proposed City of South San Francisco Stonnwater Management Program Rate Structure" for fiscal year 2005-2006 prepared by and on file in the Office of the Stormwater Management Coordinator. That report summarizes the 2005-2006 charges that will be proposed by the City Council on July 27, 2005. Upon adoption of the proposed charges, or amendments thereto, a report entitled "City of South San Francisco Storn1water System Charges," prepared by Engineering Data Services, Los Altos, California will be completed; it will describe the amount of annual charge imposed against each parcel, by Assessor's Parcel Number, for Fiscal Year 2005-2006. All of these documents, including this report, shall be filed with the County Tax Collector or Auditor. Accompanying the filing of this report shall be the Clerk's endorsement that the report has been duly adopted by the City Council. Dated: 7h<.{lo<; ~ Director of Finance