Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/14/1966 1<1> M meet s 8 P , 1 1, co, Members , it Members o .. .. t tant Franc , 1966 t, i 2$ 19 's report City 1 M. following manner: t should denied Commission u icant: None else to li declared er comments for or against closed, vote on the matter~ to , t, ati - 82 - 3,~ : City manner: "The ect sign for approximately detriment to to cont to isco-at - a period located according to the State applicant: s, 935 to be t to answer speak for or against closed, comments Commiss ... vote on , t, i ael 4. , an arlite Street) Ii> the said plant. in <<0 PassT report and recommendat s the. Commission lowing manner: UThe subject lands are. s the adopted general therewith said industrial uses. The above use light of Landscape ist" ion this office that the provide the approximately 30 linear front of the building as shown on present, approximate 7 lineal feet filled with concrete. Also the professional rehabilitation." ing of the orig of these ting area R.. s ant ent company contact requiremerts the matter, our ing to t in department's M. San isco, who Commission might i. be att t request asked there none and Mr '" vote on mot was passed vote: , , i, Noes; Absent: If:;. oJ... 'l' l~bb 6 15 report recommendations: the Commiss f manner: Hi. The subject business land uses. 2. Said lands 35 The propos which formerly a 4. The above factors use Central a store est not constitute a detri.ment to Brent- South isco-at- use-permit the Commission that:= at the locat operation. area to be share the use of on of Cemanco, Inc... Franc is co" Treasurer.. vote on 14~ , , t i, i ent: 6 jJ 19 7 e.ct - recommenda t i ens : the s llowing manner: proposed long-range, plans 2.. The line of a s or 7 , Present lvIr .. 2 mot , t, i, manner: con- variance G", Rezendes, co", mot vote: , i ent , - 90 g.. an C City manne.r: , 524 i vote on mot vote: i , t, roll ati, ?J 19 IS manner: mot t it : .. " t acre.s manner: "The. regulat requires four , 1 9 s rman vote: i, ati, Ii i, 19 ions: following manner: proposed resubdivis two industrial parcels. The triangular conf proposed Lot 47 a~sent The oblique common 47 lly 1 s o read a from the of Map submit ient to give a ion of Lot s Park, Unit distances bearings be a foot..!T titled as shown general idea of what 32 and 33, Block , The Parcel Map ad s 46 and to seconds & Lib t exact , to answer , 1 vote on by t, i, 1 vote.: i The mot ion was Ayes: Mammini, Noes: None - 96 - 19 : 1. on accommodate cannot phys 2.. addendum s a single ivided to promote land sites are too , but much more of Sacramento's successful ftdeep PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO THE ZONING ORD 5.. PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 5..1 es: limit was set at 5, a was lowed to area's seen 0.9 acre, 5 units, -sac uses.. 9 SOl t'dee p not come n i of 5 could be out done.. more 85 -ements .. s i <I> 19 , s Catholic school.. be planned to serve the problem of a dangerous to this good community was vacant lands in the Hillsdie, Chestnut , vehicular already have two and even more cars.. Planning Commission would s were a cons 19 meet was at 9: P.. s