HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/27/1967
27,
M I NUT E
s
me.et
Planning
8: P.M.
March 27, 1967
Place:
Caune
South
Chambers,
Francisco,
Members Present:
Vice Chairman
Gardner, ati
Chairman
Members Absent:
t
o
:
Secretary to t
, Daniel M.. Pass
Inspector Roy Ghilardi
Planning
istant Franc VanSteen
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING.
the meet
of
, 1967
Rosati moved that the minutes of the meeting
, 1967 be. approved; seconded by Commissioner Mammini;
the following roll call vote:
, Gardner,
ati, Zlatunich and
, Boblitt
2 -
- 2 -
on:
Roman Cathol Archbishop
establishment of a church-parochial
easterly s of Callan Boulevard,
District,
and
UP-39, of Ted Connolly, to permit the establishment a
shopping center at the northwesterly corner of Westborough
and Junipero Serra Freeway (proposed) the
(For both applications, see
February 14, 1967, page
the meeting of January 23,
Commiss ion Meet
of the minutes and for
67, page 6
ore
the
announcement:
matters were taken into cons
Raffael the following
the City not completed stud on
works needs of the Westborough community,
its c izenry, ing Commission will cont
act on all major applications,maps and pet
which pertain to the physical development of the
community.
public hearings on UP-33, request of the Roman
Archbishop, and UP-39 request of Ted Connolly, are
fore unt Planning Commission's regular meet
, 1967.
- ~ ~
March l ~ 1
M.
the
t
. The proposed farm would constitute
worthy of encouragement, even though
in tenure.
2. Said use would not constitute a substant
Park Avenue Heights area, Neighborhood 10,
Community, or South San Francisco-at
3. It is recommended that
to requirements of the
sp~ce, and
temporary
to the
approved,
Works.."
the
Louis H. Goss,
San isco, to
existing running along the north s of
from Laurel Avenue to Chestnut Avenue which
storm water from the subject property to Chestnut
this ditch should be cleaned out so
and water and top s will not run over onto
..
sees no objection to the use of this property
providing Tamarack Lane is kept clean.u
the applicant was Mr.. Stanley Haney, trict
San Francisco Unified School trict and
ive 398 uBI' Street, South San Franc co,
Off
Ghilardi
on site.
were to remove it
to speak for or against
the public hearing on
comments ioners.
the s
Department
s
was more
to
there were
cond to
, and if use would
structures. Mr. Haney
case of noncompl
after 90
use would
comments by any the other Commissioners
asked a motion on the matter and a
<I)
Commissioner Mammini , seconded by Commissioner Gardner to
approve the request as applied for, however subject to the
recommendations made by the City Planner and to full compliance
with and acceptance of the requirements set forth the report
of the Director of Public Works.
The motion passed by the
call vote:
Ayes: Mammini, Gardner,
i, Zlatunich and Raffaelli
Noes: None
: Boblitt
27,
an
t appurtenant sign
the M-2-H District.
the Commission in the following manner:
proposed sign manifests aesthet characterist ,and would
be congruous with other modern, conservative signs on Dubuque
Since involved premises are approximately one acre in
size, the proposed sign would not be excessively large.
The granting the instant request not const e a
material detriment to the South San Francisco Industrial
or the City of South San Francisco-at-large.
is therefore recommended that
u
<II>
for the applicant was Mr..
Street, co,
Federal Signs,
as agent",
being no one else to s against the request,
Raffaelli declared public hearing on matter
and solicited comments from the Commissioners..
Mammini asked if this was meant as a one-year s
necessity to apply for renewal. Mr. Pass that
was not the case and that the permit would be
permanent sign and that the application was meant
..
ing no further comments by any of the other Commissioners
Chairman Raffaelli asked for a motion on the matter and a roll 1
thereon.
Commissioner Zlatunich moved, seconded by Commissioner Mammini,
to approve the request as applied for and according to the
recommendations made by the City Planner.
mot
a
1 call vote as follows:
..
..
,
Rosati, Zlatunich
None
,
- l76 ...
- 5 -
27 fI 19b7
on
e
sion in the f
manner:
sign would be aesthetic in appearance as well
, from a commercial standpoint, to the iness
on the subject premises.
Said sign would not constitute a mat to t
f1Valley Park Center", Camino Community, or South San
Francisco-at
is therefore recommended that the use t
granted if
,
Bruno, Californ
subject fac
s company, who
tions that might come
for or against the request,
public hearing on this matter
comments from the Commissioners.
comments by any of the other
a motion on the matter
,
Mammini moved,
request as
made
by Commiss
and according to the
Planner..
,
mot
by a
vote as
..
"
,
, Rosati, Zlatunich
i
..
..
t,
7
.,., 6 -
27,
construct of an
family dwel the required
Felipe Avenue, in the R-I Dis
(!I
the Commission in the f
manner:
variance supported by the existing 3.00' side
yard on the subject ,and the similar variances granted in
connect with Serra Highlands lots.
The said variance would not establish a new
would merely extend an existing one.
The granting of V-20 would not constitute a mat
to the involved area, the Camino Community, or
Francisco-at-large.
It is therefore recommended
approval..u
ing 1
, but
detriment
San
the instant request
There being no one else. to for or the request,
Chairman Raffaelli declared public hearing on this matter
closed solicited comments from the Commissioners..
no further comments by any of the Commissioners,
asked for a motion on the matter and a roll
ioner Rosati moved, seconded by Commissioner Gardner to
the request as applied for and according to the
ions made by the City Planner..
mot
by a roll call vote as follows:
..
'"
Mammini, Gardner, Rosati, Zlatunich and Raffaelli
..
..
..
..
t, Lazzari
- 178 -
March Zlll It)b
V-2
one-s ,
enlarged
of
Commiss
the f
manner:
"The request variance supported by
and area of the subject Iding site, and
variances granted in Sunshine Gardens.
Although the proposed addit would ject almost 5.00'
the required rear yard, ant rear yard on the
building site would sti l200 sq.. ft.
the
substandard
s
o
should
n
e e to or against
declared public hearing on
comments from the commissioners..
comments by any of the Commiss
for a motion on the matter
, seconded by Commiss
for
Planner..
,
mot passed by a roll call vote as follows:
,
ati,
and
Iii
ent:
,
South
11 1967
San
at 8: P
9 -