HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/11/1967
I N U E S
p
,
t:
sent"
to
of
s
i
-9
7
II
ce.
s
's
to
answer
a restatement
, and
_ ? A/I _
- 2,a.-
7
t
t
,
1-
,
of
common,
11/
- ?RS -
, 19 7
i
Commiss asked what by word
nprofess .. s s used under
terms describing uses 3 Dis had to
fined. word was more a by its and when a
use, which was not named Ordinance's defin
, would to Commiss to j
use within framework of Com-
at the time word was defined.
with
this could in some
Pass answered
terms
a prime
be the
daily
and
Admin trat
under one
to him.
,
and
While
Executive and
1 and
dis ction to
different dis
offices were allowed 3
offices were not, but were in
cussed this matter among themselves
essent differences between mean-
s.
cussion, no
Chairman Ra
matter a recommen
vote thereon..
comments
asked for a
Commiss
er Bob
Resolution No. 2091.
IiA OF PLANNING COMMISS
SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING THE
AMENDMENTS THE 'DEFINITIONS'
ZONING ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED
_ ?Ah -
- 2,c -
11
7
s
Ayes:
Noes:
s
sent:
AND
i,
s
Ro
vote"
,
and
f
i..
co
co
- 2R7 -