Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 02/10/1969 , 19 M of the s meet the co 8:00 P..Me .. .. , 1969 .. .. 1 Chambers, orn co, MEMBERS : Commissioner and Chairman ati, .. .. : s G.. I.. or Je z MEETING Minutes Commiss 27, 1969 Rosati meet 27 .. .. , i, ati, Campredon, : t, ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING OF Chairman co that anyone who jected to - 2 - 69 inued use R. & Be Dave to amend the plans of nClub Apartments ment", so as to establ the "South Bay Club" consist ing , on approximately 9..457 acres of land, on westerly s of El Camino Real, approximately 360' southerly of Camaritas Avenue, the nun District. (continued from meetings November 25, 1968, pages 1-632 minutes January l3, 1969, page 669 minutes). Mr", a letter ed January 30, 69, from , of Planning the R. & B. Company, 11570 Olympic Boulevard, Los applicant, to wit: , with deepest regret I must inform for a planned community (UP-l02) on the must be withdrawn at this time. Economics of various types and magnitude is the reason", We have made a dilligent effort through our architect, SBC Des Skinner, .1 ., to create a project satisfact South San Francisco and ourselves", We were unable to sat needs within the framework the economic feasibility of project.. Might I extend this company's thanks to you, your staff, and all city off ials of South San Franc co. The ion, consideration, and encouragement shown by the entire group f t we have ever met in any area we have entered. that View We would appreciate that we submitted, as both time and money. wishes to you",n opportunity to pick up any of brochures represents a considerable investment luded are my personal regrets and my t mot vote: ati, , .. " - 3 - 8 Use , to luminated s aggregate area square feet, ing a drugstore as proposed for Westborough Square Shopping Center, in the C-l hment City Planner Pass read the following recommendation as made by office, to wit: ftThe Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the findings 1 ted the attached, preliminary Off ial Action Report, and approve the requested use permit." :Mr.. Pass the following findings as made by his office, to wit: tfl.. The es:tablishment, maintenance, operation or the use of building or lands for which the permit is sought not, under circumstances the particular case, be detrimental to health, safety, , comfort and general persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6..23 of the Zoning Ordinance.. 3. The proposed sign would conform to the architectural acter of Westborough Square, a shopping des to serve the entire Westborough Community.. 4.. Said proposed sign would serve a l20'-wide drug store..t1 was :Mr eo QRS , 1939 Harris would be happy to have.. to speak declared the comments or against the lic on Commiss matter comments by any Zlatunich declared the on the matter and a , moved, seconded by City ed, however, upon ments 1 .. .. i, ati, - 4 - V-62 10, 1969 request of Louis J. i to required rear yard on a the easterly side tlefield Avenue field), in the M-2-H trict.. truct an of land to 442 on City Planner Pass read the following recommendat office to wit: as made by nIt is respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the findings listed in the attached, preliminary Official Act Report, and approve the requested variance upon the condit that the applicant comply with the attached requirements of the reporting department heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Architectural Committee.ff Mr. Pass read the following Findings as made by his off , to wi t : tfl. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not generally to land or buildings in the same district. 2.. The granting of the application is necessary for the preser- vation and enjoyment of substantial property rights the pet .. 3.. That the grant of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working the neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and 1 not, the circumstances of the particular case, be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in said neighborhood. 4.. The granting of the requested variance will be with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.. harmony 5. " The requested variance is necessary to prevent pract 1 difficult ,unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.. 6.. The 15' rear-yard requirement in the trict to encourage the establishment of alleys, where such es ment would be desirable and practicable. the tant case, the establishment of an alley along the rear property of the subject building site would neither desirable nor practicable... 7.. Under the proposed "Comprehensive Revampment to Ordinance," the Planning Commission, on March 25, 1968, recommended that the rear-yard requirement in the M-2 trict regulations deleted 8.. s , s have - 4A - V-62 69 Mr.. Pass the Conditions as recommended by off ice: tiThe comply with the attached requirements of reporting department heads, and subsequent require- ments of the Architectural Committee.Tt Mr. Pass further read an interoff memorandum dated January 31, 1969 from of Public Works Louis H@ : "Proposed construct referenced s t industrial building on the above makes the following .. .. 1. a 5 oot storm the property the rear.. No construct othenvise will be allowed on this easement*' on a portion of or 2... A grading plan shall furnished 'with the building which will show detail the method for draining the area the pattern for posal of roof water. Water will not be allowed to run onto adjacent property and it recommended that asphalt be constructed along the parking areas to the water toward Littlefield Road... 3.. There a 33TT RCP storm sewer on the south side f Road which can be used for the disposal of storm water.. is a sanitary sew'er on Littlefield Road west this storm sewer which has a lateral connection to the subject property. The developer's engineer should check the sand elevation of this lateral to determine whether it sat factory to the ed building.. amount of bay mud under the tiefield Avenue. the recom- ice that a comprehensive soils be furnished to this giving a amount of ant settlement that can be next twenty years..u Mr.. Pass further read an interoffice memorandum, , from Landscape Spec t John E.. January 31, "I recommend applicant be Committee will require more street trees than are shown on preliminary plan.. Applicant is aware the standards the Architectural Committee and will undoubtedly submit a better when ies a build permit,," J.. Poletti, co, Calif to answer t 69 mot the vote: .. .. i, ati, NOES: None .. .. t, 6 - - 5 - 69 request of Louis i, to truct two required rear yard on a parcel land west s of t ield 'JI approximately 2001 of La'\;qrence Au-e.nue.. (Next to ttAi.rland Freight , in the District e City Pass read the following re.commendati.on as made by his office, to wit: "It ly recommended that the Planning Commiss adopt the indings embodied in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report, and approve requested variance upon the condition that the applicant comply with the attached requirements the reporting department heads, and the sub- sequent requirements of the Architectural Committee.." Mr. Pass further read the Findings as made by his office, to wit: .. TIlere are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building referred to the application, which circumstances or conditions do not generally to land or buildings in the same district. 2.. The granting the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights the pet ioner., 3.. That the granting of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, materially versely the health or safety persons residing or the neighborhood of the property the applicant, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to improvements said neighborhood.. 4.. The granting of the requested variance will be with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.. harmony 5.. The requested variance is necessary to prevent iculties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The rear-yard requirement in the M-2 District designed to promote the establishment of alleys, where such establishment of an alley along the rear property line of the subject build- i site would be neither desirable nor icable.. 7. The Planning Commission recently recommended that yard requirements the M-2 trict regulations be therefrom.. 8e Similar variances have been granted by the s ion" n V-63 Mr.. s as by .. .. with the attached requirements of , and the subsequent requ Committee..n interoffice memorandum from ,to : or of the to 2", 3 dl A grading or s Water only sanitary sewer in the building s.. flow checked to make certain 1 flow to the be furnished show method to run onto of the to further interoffice memorandum, dated to wit: Mr. 1969 , memorandum, dated , to wit: 31, at show 8 - v- comments comments by declared matter thereon.. Commissioner to the the moved, seconded by Commiss the City Planning Off as requested, however, irements and conditions as set forth Building pector, the or Chief, the Architectural motion was sed by the following roll call vote: .. .. i, ati, , Zlatunich NOES: ABSENT: , - 6 .- City Planner Pass read the following recornmendat made .. '" proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the ate Sub- division Map Act, and standards and regulations embodied the Subdivis Ordinance of the City of South Francisco. Said subdivis would create two industrial parcels of While the proposed parcels would long and narrow depths not be more than two and one-half times widths. It is therefore respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission approve the instant tentative parcel map upon the condit that the subdivider comply with the attached requirements of the City's reporting department heads..." Mr", Pass then read an interoffice memorandum, dated February 3, 1969 from Director of Public Works Louis H... Goss,. to wit: VlReference made to 'Tentative Parcel Map for Resubdivs of Parcel 18 of the Parcel Map Resubdivision 2, 3, 4, 59 6 & 7, Block ll, So. S. F... Indle Park Unit No... 2 South San Francisco, 1f prepared by Louis A. Arata, Louis J.. Poletti, Subdivider. Please be advis this office has checked the tentative parcel map and mends approval subject to the filing of an offic map",u Mr. Pass further read an interoffice memorandum, dated February 3, 1969 from Chief ing Inspector Leonard z, to : have examined the Tentative Parcel Map divis of 18 of Parcel Map Volume 4 a resubdivision of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, South Francisco Indust Park Unit following corrections should be made 48 being a Page 12 which was 7, Block ... 2 and f final 1. The area to the south of the proposed parcels 20 21 should be identified in dotted lettering Parcel Map Volume 4, 12, eliminating the lettering, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7... Block Number II should be circled and in dotted 2. The le should read, Ubeing a resubdivision Parcel Maps Volume 4, Page 12, a resumdivision of Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block ll, South San Francisco Industrial Unit No.. 2-E.. n 3.. The final with two should the standard l8t! x margin at left edge and one inch on Present was stated Commiss , Mr. happy to answer - 7 , 1969 one else further to speak Zlatunich declared matter, and s comments by declared the matter and a mot sed roll vote: .. " i, ati, Campredon, : None ABSENT : , meet was at 8:29 p.m.. - 711 -