Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/24/1972 MINUTES July 24, 1972 of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission ) TIME: 8:00 p.m. DATE: - July 24, 1972 PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall ~buth San Francisco, California MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Botieff, Commissioners Campredon, Lazzari, Zlatunich, and Chairman Raffaelli MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Gardner ALSO PRESENT: City Planner and Secretary to the South San Francisco Planning Commission, Daniel M. Pass Assistant Planner WilliamA. Timmons Planning Aide Surendra N. Amin Building Inspector Rex Greene MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 1972 Commissioner Campredon moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of July 10, 1972 be approved; seconded by Commissioner Zlatunich, passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice Chairman Botieff, Commissioners Campredon, Lazzari, Zlatunich, and Chairman Raffaelli NOES: None fBSENT: Commissioner Gardner , ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING Chairman Raffaelli announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be recorded on tape, but that anyone who wished to come before the Commission in order to be heard, but obj ected to having his voice recorded in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned "off" for the duration of the time that he is speak- ing or is heard. - 3191 - UP-229 July 24, 1972 UP-229, use-permit request of R B Industries to establish a retail furniture store on the southwesterly side of El Camino Real, about 220' southerly of Ponderosa Road, in the "UVI Unclassified District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indicated on the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular cas e, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The establishment of the proposed use would be consonant with the Working-Living Areas Element of the General Plan, and would be compatible with the commercial 1and~use pattern on El Camino Real. 4. The proposed use would manifest an inordinate emphasis upon aesthetic design. More than 11% of the subject site would be devoted to landscaping. 5. Since the floor space of the proposed furniture store would be primarily devoted to storage, the 29 off-street parking spaces indicated on the submitted plot plan should be ample. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall comply with the submitted requirements of the City's Department Heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee 2. Temporary or permanent signs in addition to those indicated in the instant application shall not be located on the subject premises. 3. The requested use permit shall become null and void when the subject premises are occupied by a use other than a retail furniture store. I.O.M. dated July 10, 1972 from James L. Datzman, Captain of Police Commander, Service Division. "The Police Department recommends approval of application for Use Permit 229 UP-229 continued July 24, 1972 11 A. Provisions are made for installation of an adequate intrusion alarm system. B. Exterior doors and windows, particularly in the dock are'ft which is not readily visible from the E1 Camino, are secured in order to reduce burglary potential. C. Two traffic signs are installed at the parking lot exit to reduce road hazards. 1. An arterial Stop sign (R-l) even though "Stop" is to be painted on the pavement. 2. A "Right Turn Only" sign (R-41) is attached to the arterial pole to prevent wrong way travel on El Camino. II Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Ronald W. Gold Construction Manager for R B Industries 1800 Century Park East, Suite 1012 Los Angeles, 90067, agent of the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-229 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the sub- mitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Vice-Chairman Botieff. The motion was passed unanimously. UP-232 UP-232, use-permit request of Levio M. Bonino to establish a seven-unit dwelling group at No. 110 Spruce Avenue, in the R-3 District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass The Office of the City Planner respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons - 3193 - UP-232 continued July 24, 1972 "residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the requirements of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed dwelling group would consist .of an orderly acilmi;xture of a well-designed old duplex and a well-designed new apartment house. CONDITIONS: Tue applicant shall meet the submitted requirements of the City's officials, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee. I.O.M. dated July 14, 1972 from Edward H. Peterson, Office of the Landscape Specialist lIThe following requirements shall be met by the applicant at the Architectural Committee stage of proceedings. 1. The plans shall show 6" minimum raised concrete or asphalt curbs between driveway and planted areas. 2. The plans shall show irrigation facilities for all planted areas. 3. There shall be three street trees planted in the landscape area adjacent to Baden Avenue. 4. The plans shall designate all shrubs, trees, and ground cover plants by recognized botanical names. 5. The plans shall specify sizes of all plants by size of container. 6. There shall be more vertical plant material elements introduced. Large growing trees and shrubs are suggested, to eliminate the "industrial look" in the landscaping." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Maurice Brosnan, 607 Poplar Ave. South San Francisco, Calif., Agent of the applicant. Levio M. Bonino, 1056 Sunnyside Drive South San Francisco, Calif, the applicant Opponents: None - 3194 - UP-232 Continued July 24, 1972 Considerable discussion took place regarding resemblance between existing duplex and new five-unit apartment building. Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-232 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads, and extend landscaping to alley and repaint the existing building to match the new one. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lazzari. The motion was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Campredon, Lazzari, Zlatunich and Chairman Raffaelli NOES: Vice Chairman Botieff ABSENT: Commissioner Gardner UP-161 UP-161, the matter of Employee Parking at the Bank of America's Linden Avenue-Lux Avenue Branch. (Presentation by Mr. E. H. Spencer, Assistant Vice-President of the Bank of America.) The Commission heard Mr. E. H. Spencer, Assistant Vice President of the Bank of America, Mr. Harvey Fanucci, Vice President and Manager of the South San Francisco Branch of the Bank of America, and Daniel M. Pass, City Planner of the City of South San Francisco. At the conclusion of the aforementioned consideration, the Commission, by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present, made the following findings, and took the following action. FINDINGS 1. The Planning Commission's granting of UP-161 on August 10, 1970, impliedly required the Bank of America to provide on-site, off-street parking for the employees of the latter's Linden Avenue-Lux Avenue facility. 2. The Bank of America has steadfastly prohibited employee parking at its Linden Avenue-Lux Avenue facility. 3. The Planning Commission has uniformly required commercial and industrial land users to provide off-street parking for their employees. ... 3195 - UP-16l Continued July 24, 1972 114. The Bank of America's failure to provide employee parking at its Linden-Lux facility tends to reduce available on-street parking and Parking District off-street parking in the urban core, and therefore could adversely affect mercantile activity in the central business district of South San Francisco. ACTION Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Bank of America shall provide and reserve ten (10) off-street parking spaces on its Linden Avenue-Lux Avenue site for its employees; or, it shall provide and reserve one (1) off-street parking space for each of its regular employees in a privately-owned parking lot which shall be located a maximum of two blocks from the said Linden Avenue-Lux Avenue site. The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Botieff and unanimously passed by the Commissioners present. V-l44 V-144, variance request of the Superior Aluminum Body Corp. to construct an industrial building in the required, rear setback of the building site located on the easterly side of Starlite Street, about 230' southerly of South Canal Street, in the M-l-H District. ~cretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner, DanielM. Pass. IIHistorica1 Note: The instant application is a resubmitta1 of V-142, but embodies the app1icffilt's revised plot plan. V-142 was withdrawn on July 10, 1972, without prejudice. The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Com- mission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land or build- ings in the same district. 2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the petitioner. 3. That the granting of the application will not, under the circum- stances of the particular case, materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and will not, under the circum- stances of the particular case, be materially detrimental to the - 3196 - V-144 Continued July 24, 1972 "public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in said neighborhood. 4. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The rear-yard requirements of the M-l-H District are designed to promote the establishment of alleys, where such establishment would be desirable and practicable. In the instant case, the establishment of an abbey would be neither desirable nor practicable. 7. The Planning Commission has granted many similar setback variances. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall comply with the submitted requirements of the City's Department Heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: George Avanessian, AIA, Architect 914 Linden Avenue, South San Francisco, CA. Agent of the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve V-144 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Zlatunich. The motion was passed unanimously. - 3197 - PM-94 July 24~ 1972 PM-94, tentative parcel map of Maurice Brosnan~ representing the re- arrangement of two adjoining lots, located on the northerly side of Rocca Avenue, about 350' westerly of Poplar Avenue, in the "R-l" District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The proposed rearrangement of adjoining lots meets the require- ments of the State Subdivision Map Act, and the regulatory stan- dards embodied in the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco. Said rearrangement would improve the configuration of the subject lots, and the building-site quality of Lot 6. In light of the above factors, the Planning Division respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission approve the instant tentative parcel map, upon the condition that the subdivider comply with the submitted requirements of the officials of the City of South San Francis co. YI Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents: Proponents: Maurice Brosnan 607 Poplar Avenue South San Francisco, Ca., the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Planning Commission approve the instant tentative parcel map upon the condition that the subdivider comply with the requirements as set forth by the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Campredon. The motion was passed unanimously. PM-95 PM-95 , tentative parcel map of the Piombo Construction Company, representing the subdivision of a 1.4-acre parcel of land~ located on the southwesterly side of E1 Camino Real~ about 200' southerly of Ponderosa Road~ in the "U" District, into 2 lots. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner, Daniel M. Pass 8 PM-95 Continued July 24, 1972 "Historical Note: The subj ect parent parcel map was created under Parcel Map-86, which was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on January 24, 1972. Recommendation: The proposed resubdivision meets the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, and the regulatory standards of the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco. Said subdivision would create two, well-designed commercial lots. In light of the aforementioned factors, the Planning Department respectfully recommends that the P1Rllning OOlflID't$suimn approve the instant tentative parcel map upon the condition that the subdivider comply with the submitted requirements of the City's department heads. Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents: Proponents: Louis A. Arata, P.E., Registered Civil Engineer l80 El Camino Real, Millbrae, Calif., Agent of the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission approve the instant tentative parcel map upon the condition that the subdivider comply with the requirements as set forth by the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Vice-Chairman Botieff. The motion was passed unanimously. RZ~24 RZ-24, proposed rezoning of a certain 10.36-acre parcel of land located at the southwesterly corner of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive, from "R-3", restricted Multiple Family Residential District, to "R-2", Duplex Residential District. (Continued from meeting of May 8, 1972). Secretary Pass read the following reports into the record. Report anQ recommendation of the City Planner, Daniel M. Pass "Urban Planning Analysis - 79 The instant matter is before the Planning Commission pursuant to this body's adoption of Resolution No. 2123, a resolution of intent to redistrict the subject territory from "R-3" to "R-2". - 3199 - RZ-24 Continued July 24, 1972 "The Planning Department has perused the proposed zonal change, and has performed a city-planning survey of the ten-acre parcel of land in question. The following analysis and recommendation are predicated upon the said perusal and survey. ANALYSIS 1. The subj ect lands were reclassified from "U" District to "R-3" District in 1965 to accommodate the Westborough Unit No.5 (Jolly King) planned unit development. The Use and Variance Permits which were subsequent~y granted for the purpose of establishing the subject planned unit development have expired on the ground of nonuse. While the final subdivision map of Westborough Unit No. 5 was approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council, it is also no longer viable, since it was not recorded within the time prescribed by the State Subdivision Map Act. 2. Although the reason for the subject land's "R-3" classification is no longer extant, the said classification remains. The property owner of these lands can, without Use Permit, establish more than 400 dwelling units in defunct Westborough Unit No.5. 3. The construction of a 400-unit apartment house project on the lands in question would tend to glut the Westborough Bouletrard-Ca11an Boule- vard-Oakmont Drive intersection, and thereby limit residential enjoyment in the adj acent "R-1" area of Westborough. 4. The subject lands are slated for low-density residential development under the General Plan of 1969, entitled, "Orderly Growth," and were so slated under the General Plan of 1963. 5. The "R-3" zoning of the lands in question is in derogation of the General Plan. Section 65860(a) of the Government Code provides: "County or City zoning ordinances shall be consistent with the General Plan of the County or City by January 1, 1973." 6. The rezoning of the lands in question to "R-2" would bring them into close conformity with the adopted general plan of the City of South San Francisco. 7. The above factors indicate that the subject lands should be rezoned from "R-3" to "R-2". The "R-2" zoning would enable the landowner to develop his property on a planned-unit basis, or to subdivide said property into conventional lots. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Com- mission adopt the attached, preliminary resolut on, and thereby recommend that the Honorable City Council rezone the subj ct lands from "R-3" to "R-2". - 3200 - RZ-24 Continued July 24, 1972 Opponents: Michael C. Callan 82 Isabella Avenue Atherton, California Mr. Callan explained the whole history regarding the above property and requested that the subject matter be held over until the City Council decides on the Seismic Safety Element, and when there is more information available. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the subject matter, and the Commission suggested the item be held over for 90 days. Commissioner Zlatunich suggested that the public hearing be closed and the matter to continue after that when it is brought for further re- consideration. With the concurrence of the Planning Commission, Chairman Raffaelli announced that RZ-24 will be held over until the regular meeting of October 24, 1972. The public hearing is closed and the subject matter will continue from there onwards. There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare, and there being no further communications or other matters of interest for the Planning Commission, Chairman Raffaelli announced that the next regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be held on August 14, 1972 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, South San Francisco, California. The meeting was adjourned at 10:14 P.M. tP~; Mario Raffae:r Chairman, Planning Commission City of South San Francisco Daniel Pass Secretary, Planning Commission City of South San Francisco *Oral presentation, arguments and comments are recorded on tape. The tape is on file in the Office of the City Planner. sna - 3201 - UP-223 August 14, 1972 UP-223, use-permit request of Jones-Guaspari to enlarge a retail, drive-in dairy at No. 130 South Spruce Avenue, in the "P-C-M" District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letter into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner, Daniel M. Pass. "The Planning Division respectfully recommends that the Planning Commi ssion adopt the "findings" and action embodied in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: "1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed enlargement would enable the subj ect dairy to expand its retail services to the public. 4. The proposed enlargement would be architecturally designed. 5. The applicant's plot plan indicates that the enlarged dairy would be served by improved on-site traffic circulation. CONDITIONS: "The applicant shall comply with the submitted requirements of the City's officials, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee." Interoffice Memorandum, dated August 1, 1972, from D. Zylker, Acting Fire Chief "Driveways to be 26' minimum width. Curb radius to be 30 Y ." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Kaz Yamaski, Architect Markling & Yamaski l32 BrentwDod Drive South San Francisco, Ca. Opponents: None - 3203 - UP-223, continued August 14, 1972 Vice Chairman Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-223 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Mathewson. The motion was passed unanimously. UP-227, use-permit request of AVCO Community Developers, Inc., to amend the building elevations and floor plans of eight townhouses in Planned Unit Development "I", located at the most easterly corner of Callan Blvd. and Greendale Drive (North), in the Westborough-West Park No.3 Planned Community District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letter into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "Historical Notes: Planned Unit Development "I" was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 1971, under UP-183. The final subdivision map of Westborough-West Park, Unit No. 3B was conditionally approved by the Commission on July 13, 1970, under SA-16. The Planning Division respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action embodied in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The proposed amendments would not adversely affect the nature, character, or design of Planned Unit Development "I." 4. The proposed building elevations would tend to improve the order and amenity of the Greenda1e Neighborhood, and the Westborough Community-at-large. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall comply with the submitted requirements of the City.s officials, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee." Interoffice Memorandum dated August 4, 1972 from the Office of the Landscape Specialist, Ed Peterson - 3204 - UP-227, continued August 14, 1972 "The Office of the Landscape Specialist submits the following requirements regarding Use Permit 227: 1. All rear yards shall have a positive drainage system. No overslope drainage shall be permitted. Detailed rear yard drainage plans shall be prepared and submitted for the approval of the Ecological Department Director. 2. The applicant shall provide at least one street tree for each lot, but not less than one stree tree per 25' of street abutment. The applicant's street tree selection and planting program shall comply with the standards and specifications of the Landscape Specialist. 3. The developer shall construct fences along the boundary lines between common greens and non-residential territory, except where said territory is situated within dedicated public streets. 4. All rear yards shall provide access to the common greens. " Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Jay Frechette AVCO Community Developers, Inc. 1177 Saratoga, Sunnyvale Rd. San Jose, Ca. Opponents: None Commiss-ioner Gamma moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-227 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Hale. The motion was passed unanimously. UP-230 UP-230, use-permit request of AVCO Community Developers, Inc. to amend the building elevations and floor plans of 50 proposed town- houses in Planned Unit Development "K," located on Westchester Court, at Radburn Drive, and on Geddes Court, in the Westborugh- West Park No.3 Planned Community District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letter into the record. - 3205 - UP-230, continued August 14, 1972 Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "Historical Notes: The Planning Commission, on June 26, 1972, con- ditionally granted UP-225, use-permit request to establish Planned Unit Development "K.1l The Commission conditionally approved the final map of Westborough-West Park No. 3 Planned Unit No. 3E on August 9, 1971, under SA-20. The Planning Division respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the Attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed amendments would not adversely affect the nature, character, or design of Planned Unit Development "K." 4. The proposed building elevations would improve the texture and artistic quality of the Greendale Neighborhood. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall comply with the submitted require- ments of the City's officials, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee. II Interoffice memorandum, dated August 4, 1972, from the Office of the Landscape Specialist Ed Peterson. "The Office of the Landscape Specialist submits the following requirements regarding Use Permit 230: l. All rear yards shall have a positive drainage system. No overslope drainage shall be permitted. Detailed rear yard drainage plans shall be prepared and submitted for the approval of the Ecological Department Director. 2. The applicant shall provide at least one street tree for each lot, but not less than one street tree per 25 'of street abutment. The applicant's street tree selection and planting program shall comply with the standards and specifications of the Landscape Specialist. - 3206 - UP-230, continued August 14 1972 !l3. The developer shall construct fences along the boundary lines between common greens and non-residential territory, except where said territory is situated within dedicated public streets. 4. All rear yards shall provide access to the common greens." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Jay Frechette AVCO Community Developers, Inc. 1177 Saratoga, Sunnyvale Road San Jose, Ca. Opponents: None After a brief discussion on the project it was agreed that the Planning Commission will sit as the Architectural Committee and the regular Archi- ~e~tural Committee members are to serve as a technical advisory board when the subject matter is brought up for architectural approval. Commissioner Gamma moved that the Planning Commission adoJ(t the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-230 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Slade. The motion was passed unanimously. UP-23l UP-231, use-permit request of AVCO Community Developers, Inc., to amend the building elevations and floor plans of one proposed townhouse in Planned Unit Development ilJ," located at the northwesterly corner of Greenda1e Drive and Geddes Court, in the Westborough-West Park Planned Community District No.3. Secretary Pass read the following report and letter into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "Historical Notes: The Planning Commission, on June 14, 1971, con- ditionally granted UP-190, use-permit request to establish Planned Unit Development "J." The Conunission, under SA-17, conditionally approved the final map of Westborough-West Park Unit No. 3C, on March 8, 1971. The Office of the City Planner respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action embodied in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. - 3207 -