Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/22/1977 M I NUT E S of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission TIME: 7:30 P.M. DATE: MARCH 22, 1977 PLACE: WEST ORANGE LIBRARY AUDITORIUM ME~1BERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairman Tegl ia, Commissioners Bertucell i, Campredon, Goldberg, Mathewson, Mullin and Chairman Slade MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Acting City Planner City Engineer William Costanzo Robert Yee Assistant Planner Mark Wheeler Director of Public Services Planning Division Secretary Frank Addiego Pamela J. Bayer MINUTES OF PREV~OUS MEKTING Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 22, 1977 Commissioner Mathewson moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of February 22, 1977, be approved. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mullin and was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Campredon, Goldberg, Mathewson, Mullin and Chairman Slade NOES: None ABSENT: Vice-Chairman Teglia (arrived after the vote) ABSTAINED: Commissioner Bertucelli ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING Chairman Slade announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be recorded on tape, but that anyone who wished to come before the Commission to be heard, but who objected tobaving his or her voice recorded in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned "off" for the duration of the time that he or she is speaking or is heard. - 3715 - March 22, 1977 UP-77-374 & UP-77-375 Applications of Neil Vannucci to construct a 16 unit apartment building and a 39 unit apartment building respectively located on Mission Road at the terminus of Grand Avenue in the "UII Unclassified Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff reports and noted to the Commission that they would have to take three actions: 1. Move that the Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration prepared by staff; 2. Move to adopt the findings; 3. Move to approve or deny, based on the conditions. Proponents: Mr. Neil Vannucci 1555 Bayshore Highway Burlingame, CA Charlene Johnson, Attorney 1 California Street San Francisco, CA x. Tragoutsis, co-owner of the property for the 16 unit building 128 Brentwood Drive South San Francisco, CA George Smith, owner of property for the 39 unit building 6843 Mission Street Daly City, CA Mr. John Penna 435 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Opponents: Dr. Charles Bona 1131 Mission South San Francisco, CA Dr. Joseph Awender 1061 High Road Woodside, CA Mr. Vannucci noted that they would be providing door locks and on the 39 unit they would be providing a recreation center. He further noted they would be exceeding the landscaping requirements. He also noted that they had been approached by utility companies, insulafioniicompanies and electrical companies to employ methods to help conserve energy and that they plan to take action on working towards this, but that they can make no guarantees at this time be- cause of the possible costs involved and many unknown factors that could influence it. Mr. Tragoutsis noted that he is the co-owner of the property on which the 16 unit building is proposed to be built and that they had this site for 10 years. - 3716 - UP-77-374 & UP-77-375, contl~ March 22, 1977 Mr. Tragoutsis noted that due to the fact that this street is rather out of the way, it has been difficult to get tenants in there, except possibly for lawyers who would be working in conjunction with the courthouse. He noted that office buildings would not be financially feasible and felt that the apartment buildings would be appropriate for this area. Mr. George Smith, owner of the property on which the 39 unit building is proposed noted that he once intended to put up an office building, but that there were too many problems. He said he had trouble financing this type of building and that the finance company required that 50 percent of the building be leased first and signed by the bank and then they would only lend 60 percent. He noted that unless there is an owner occupied building, they are not very willing to lend money towards a commercial type of use. Dr. Charles Bona noted his opposition to this development. He read into the record a letter from the South San Francisco Chamber of Commerce which stated that the extension of Grand Avenue was budgeted in the Capital Improvements Budget and that it should be allowed to cross to El Camino Real. The letter also noted that Kaiser Hospital Js parking lot had been allowed to be conven- iently placed in the area as a deterrent to Grand Avenue being extended to El Cami no Rea 1 . Dr. Bona further read into the record a quote from a previcQl..tS staff report which stated that nothing should be done on the Grand Avenue Extension until a Kaiser report could come back to the Commission. He further quoted from a study that was done on BART. He inm.icated that the study in- cluded the Grand Avenue Extension as it relates to the Bay ARea Rapid Transit. He noted that another BART station is proposed for just north of Chestnut Avenue which would generate a great deal of traffic and would serve a large volume of people, to which one of the most feasible access roads would be the Grand Avenue Extension. He noted that in this study it was reported that Kaiser representatives had said they were never aware that South San Francisco had intended Grand Avenue to be put through and that they stated an expressed interest in researching the possibility of utilizing such a road in conjunction with the Station and the Hospital. Dr. Bona quoted from the January, 1977, MTC report which indicated a number of recommendations. One of these was that Pentac would serve the community best by working closely with local governments. Dr. Bona noted that extension has been considered for years, not just recently, and that it was indicated on the 1963 South San Francisco Master Plan. He further noted that on the Master Plan this area was designated as Administrative and Pro- fessional. Dr. Bona expressed strong feelings about apartment buildings going up in that area. He ~ndicated that himself and several doctors were lured from their Grand Avenue locations to the Mission Road location because of the growth potential for that area. He said he could see an office building in that location, but that apartment buildings would be totally out of the intent of the General Plan. Dr. Bona requested some definition of what the City proposes for that area so that the doctors in the area could make their plans according to the growth patterns. He quoted from Dr. Gruen and Neil Martin, both of whom supported the site against bringing into the Urpan Core an element that they felt was not in the best interest of South San Francisco. He noted that zoning must be consistent with the General Plan and that if the General - 3717 - UP-77-374 & UP-77-375, cont'd March 22, 1977 is not changed, then it cannot be implemented. He noted that Dr. Gruen spoke about clustering of uses within a certain area and that since this area is designated as Administrative and Professional and should grow in this direc- tion, the introduction of apartment buildings would tend for more residential growth, instead of professional. ' Dr. Joseph Awender noted that he owns property next to where the apartments are being planned. He noted that a swimming pool in South San Francisco would not be practical. He also wondered about the applicant's statement on conserving energy because he did not state that he was going to definitely put in conservation measures. He further questioned the area not being suitable for attorney office buildings. He noted that more doctors would come into the area if there were office space available for them. He said he hears many people trying to rent space and that there is a great demand for good office buildings. He wondered why Mr. Smith could not get a 50 percent occupancy. He noted that the City should fllow the Master Plan which they paid $50,000 to have done. He asked the Planning Commission to consider if the apartment buildings enhanced the present properties in that area and questioned whether his property would be affected as far as value is concerned. He felt that this type of use would lower the value of his property. Mr. John Penna, realtor, noted that he has represented this property for the last seven years and has been trying to get a commercial use in that area, but that it is not feasible. He noted that he understood that the Grand Avenue Extension had been taken off the books more than two years ago and also that the BART connection would not be affected by building up this area. He noted that financing i.s difficult to get on commercial buildings because they are the worst type of investment a lender can make and that no lender that he is aware of lends on commercial property unless part of the building is already occupied and that getting people interested in a lease is very difficult. He further noted that the use being proposed is a very fine design on the build- ing and that the setbacks are good and are more than required. He noted that there is a lot of crime in the area because it is open and that this use will help close it off and help stop some of the crimes. Mr. Vannucci noted that the discussion of the General Plan as it relates to the Grand Avenue Extension seems to have been out the door some time ago. He further noted that it is zoned R-3 directly across the street and further that the Urban Core is not located in this area, but is further downtown. Mr. Tragoutsis said that it does not matter if Dr. Bona's office were there first, he still has the right to develop his property. He further noted that he resented Dr. Bona's attitude toward apartment buildings. Dr. Bona noted that he is not down on apartment buildings, he merely wishes this area to develop as Administrative and Professional as is indicated in the General Plan and that apartment buildings would be out of character and, because of the clustering theory, would draw more such uses to the area. He further stated that Grand Avenue has not been taken off the books. Secretary Costanzo noted that staff is presently working on an RPD and C-O Zone to eliminate the "U" Unclassified Zone, but that it is not a State law that the IlU" Zone be eliminated. He stated tha,t the 1963 General Plan was repealed and that the 1969 General Plan is in effect which does not show - 3718 - UP-77-374 & UP-77-375, cont1d March 22, 1977 a Grand Avenue Extension. He noted that the General Plan does not address all the facts known about that location, such as the BART stat~on or the question of Grand Avenue which are shown in the 1963 General Plan. He explained that the clustering happens on its own caused by zoning and is a natural phenomenon. He also noted that there are other office buildings being proposed or constructed at the present time, but that an apartment building can be built in this location. He further noted that there are studies still being done on the extension of Mission to El Camino, not neces- sarily at Grand Avenue. Commi ss i oner Ma thewsoJ'l;moted tha t thi s development seems to have more bene- fits than would be allowed in an R-3 Zone. Secretary Costanzo noted that there are no density requirements for the "UII Unclassified Zone and that it would depend upon the Planning Commission. He further noted that staff is looking for direction on the density. If this were presently zoned P-l or C-O, staff would use the R-3 District requirements. Mr. Vannucci noted that he would consider the use of electrical gates for security instead of garage doors which was recommended by the Police Department. Commissioner Mathewson asked who the owner is and if the City Attorney had been consulted. Secretary Costanzo noted that Mr. Vannucci is an interested party which is the only requirement and that would be the same answer the City Attorney would give. Charlene Johnson, attorney, stated that the property is in the name of George W. Smith. Mr. John Penna confirmed this. She also stated that the other parcel is co-owned by Mr. Tragoutsis, and presented title reports for these properties. Commissioner Bertucelli said that the City did spend $50,000 to do the Master Plan and study, but that laws are enacted and are repealed or amended as the need arises. Commissioner Mullin said that the last estimate for the BART station was 40 million dollars in deficit and to hold up the project for this would be out of the purvue of the Planning Commission. He did question the intrusion of apartments into an area designated as Administrative and Professional and he asked if it would affect the values. Secretary Costanzo said he is not qualified to answer that, but he is concerned with the land uses themselves which, in this case, would not have a detrimental effect. Commissioner Mullin asked if the clustering would eliminate the concept of having professional and apartment buildings together. Secretary Costanzo noted that this theory can be involved with the lowest densities to the most intense land uses. He noted thetthere~r..eenoygh similarities be- tween the two uses that they woul d no-t;h.avea'oetrimenta 1 effect because of the intensity of the use and he noted that the traffic petterns would be the same. Commissioner Mullin asked about square footage per unit and if it would lead to a quality development. Secretary Costanzo noted that the Commission could regulate the size of the unit in this zone. Commissioner Mullin felt that there is a problem ",lith these zones ("U") because it is just free-lancing. - 3719 - UP-77-374 & UP-77-375, cont1d March 22, 1977 Secretary Costanzo noted that he would not hesitate to say so if he felt that the use permi t were improper;' Commissioner Goldberg noted that in the 39 unit building, there are 46 parking spaces proposed, whereas in the 16 unit, we require 19 and there are only 17 proposed. Secretary Costanzo noted that the Architectural Committee recommended that two spaces be eliminated to provide room for extra landscaping. Mr. Vannucci noted that he agreed to do this on their recommendation, but that if the Commission wished, he would put these two spaces back in. Commissioner Campredon asked if there was a right turn only from the complex. Secretary Costanzo noted that that is correct. Chairman Slade asked if families would be permitted to rent these units. Mr. Vannucci said they would and children are welcome. Chairman Slade questioned the "no lawn areal! by the Parks & Recreation Department. Secretary Costanzo noted that this department wanted to make sure any areas in the complex were kept up. He further noted that this relates specifically to drought quality plants. Vice-Chairman Teglia asked if we can require more parking, and noted that there is no on-street parking on Mission which is going to present a big problem. Secretary Costanzo said that more parking can be required, but noted that in the end, it would be Mr. Vannucci's problem because tenants will not rent ijhe units because of a lack of parking or they will move out as they find they have a parking problem. The Commission agreed to add Special Condition #6: "That the parking areas be totally secured to the satisfaction of the Police Department or that the carports be replaced with enclosed garages.1! Chairman Slade asked Mr. Vannucci if he were aware of all the conditions of the staff report and if he agreed with them. Mr. Vannucci stated that he was aware of them and would comply with IDhem. Commissioner Mullin moved that the Commission had reviewed and accepted the Negative Declaration, that the Commission adopt the findings of the staff report and that they approve UP-77-374 and UP-77~375 subject to all of the condi ti:ons of the staff report, wi th the addi ti on of #6 above. Commi ss i oner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon, Goldberg and Mullin NOES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioner Mathewson and Chairman Slade ABSENT: None - 3720 - March 22, 1977 UP-77-376 An application of Frumenti Development Company for a Use Permit to construct a 152 unit condominium apartment structure on property located between Carter Drive and Athy Drive, southerly of Meath Drive in the P-C Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report. Proponents: Mr. Jim Weber, Architect Mr. Dick Julian Landscape Architect Mr. Frumenti Frumento Development Company Opponents: Sally Anson 2732 Duhallow Way South San Francisco, CA George Lydon 2728 Duhallow Way South San Francisco, CA Mr. Weber explained the project, noting tha~<there would be enclosed garages wi th.g,arage doors. He noted tha~, there wereritwo major changes from the pre- viously submitted plans: 1) Theme+,<\\,ould be two means of egress for the third stories by the use of stairways; and 2) That there were previously five phases and now there are four phases. Mr. Weber explained that the use of materials and roof designs have changed. He noted that instead of flat roofs and plywood siding, they would be having sloping roofs with skylights and would use predominantly stucco materials with wood trim. Mr. Julian explained the street tree patterns and the recreation center pat- tern in contrast to screen planting at the property lines. Sally Anson noted her concerns with respect to the project. She stated that Carter is basically uncontrolled relative to traffic and that it is now a raceway. She requested that some kind of traffic devices be used to alle- viate this problem, preferrably traffic lights at Meath and Carter. She also noted that the green area proposed for the project was not adequate as a part area. She noted that there is a small park between Meath and Dahallow which is hardly adequate for the amount of people this project would generate. She also noted that the kinds of trees are a concern to her. Mr. Juliam stated that no type has yet been selected. Mr. Lydon asked the architect for the project what the parking plans are. Mr. Weber stated that each unit has a garage and there are 47 more on-site spaces and 32 additional off-site parking spaces, wh~~h are uncovered. Mr. Lydon asked him what the plan schedule for completion of the four phases would be. Secretary Costanzo noted that most of the curbs facing on this project can be parked against and that, in addition to the parking that is going to be pro- - 3721 - UP-77-376s cont'd March 22 s 1977 vided, there is additional curb frontages which would allow for guest access. He noted that the street trees are set forth in a list provided by the Parks and Recreation Department and that those are the only ones that can be used for street tree purposes. He noted that the project also exceeds the common greens area normally expected if the Braewood project had gone ahead in this location. Vice-Chairman Teglia commented that the elevations disturb her. She noted that the trees appear to be bushy and two stories tall and seem to screen the development. She noted that generally she does not like the project. Secretary Costanzo noted that there would have to be a requirement imposed on the developer in order to be sure that mature trees were used as screening. Commissioner Mathewson asked if the applicant is familiar with the condomin,iYIll codes and wi th the homeowners I associ ati on codes in thi s communi ty. SecreaEary Costanzo noted that all the conditions and requirements will be complied with, as well as with the codes of the State of California and our guidelines follow the State guidelines. Commissioner Mathewson questioned Special Condition #6 regarding one on-site identification sign. He wanted to make sure that the developer understood that this would be the only sign and that there would be no more signs in terms of sales efforts. He noted that he is not pleased either with the architecture as it resembles a couple of other projects that are disasters. Secretary Costanzo noted to the Commission that they have control over the architecture and the materials used. He suggested that we should possibly look at two or three alternatives. Commissioner Mullin noted that he did not think this project is too bad look- ing and is particularly appealing when compared with its neighbors to the north. He noted that he had not found Colina unappealing. Chairman Slade agreed. Mr. Frumenti stated that tile roofs could be used and that he did not find the elevations offensive. City Engineer Yee, relating to the suggested traffic signals at Meath and Carter, stated that they have not contemplated traffic signals in this loca- tion, but would be utilizing stop signs. Secretary Costanzo noted that there should be a condition that states that we will use the largest tree possible with the approval of the Parks and Recreation Department. Commissdoner Mathewson asked what was the density formerly used. Secretary Costanzo noted that this was approved by the Planning Commission in 1965 at 200 units with the street down the middle and that the Braewood type of development was slated for this area at a density of 118 units. The proposed development took a mid-position at 152 units. Commi ss i oner Campredon movedtoat the Comm; ss i on has revi ewed and accepted the Negative Declaration and has adopted the findings of the staff report and that UP-77-376 be approved subject to all conditions and limitations of the staff report. Commissioner Goldberg seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: - 3722 - UP-77-376, cont'd March 22, 1977 AYES: Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon, Goldberg, Mullin and Chairman Slade NOES: Vice-Chairman Teglia dnd Commissioner Mathewson ABSENT: None PM-77-l40 An application by Frumenti Development Company for a Tentative Parcel Map for the purpose of reverting to acreage 52 lots in anticipation of a condo- minium map; abandonment of a portion of the public right-of-way and of the common greens between Carter Drive, Athy Drive and Meath Drive in the P-C Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that this agenda item relates to the Use Permit application (UP-77-376) just approved. Commissioner Mathewson moved that PM-77-l40 be approved subject to all of the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Mullin seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. SA-77-38 An application of Frumenti Development Company for a Tentative Subdivision Map to create 152 air space condominium units on property located between Carter Drive, Athy Drive and Meath Drive in the P-C Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that this agenda item relates to both UP-77-376 and PM-77-l40, both of which were approved. Commissioner Goldberg moved that the findings of the staff report be adopted and that SA-77-38 be approved subject to all of the conditions and lil11itq.tions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motton,,: and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon, Goldberg, Mullin and Chairman Slade NOES: Vice-Chairman Teglia and Commissioner Mathewson ABSENT: None UP-77-377 An application by Edmundo Pacheco for a Use Permit to construct a room addition to an existing single family townhouse located at 3808 Callan Boulevard in the P-C Planned Community Zone District. - 3723 - UP-77-377, cont'd March 22, 1977 Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report. Due to the fact that the applicant was not present at the meeting, the Commission continued this agenda item to the meeting of April 26, 1977. UP-77-378 An application for a Use Permit by TraveLodge/International Inn to modify the sign structure and copy on an existing sign located in the public right-of-way at 326 South Airport Boulevard. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting to the Commission that they could deny the sign or approve it in the right-of-way or could make a recommendation to the City Council that they allow the sign copy to be changed. Proponents: Joe Finkelberg Heath & Company 3225 Lacey Street Los Angeles, CA Randy Peterson, General Manager International Inn 326 S. Airport Boulevard South San Francisco, IA Opponents: None Mr. Finkelberg noted that they are changing the copy only, not the structure. Mr. Peterson noted that there is poor identification for the restaurant area and that they really need the signing. Commissioner Campredon asked how big the sign is in square footage. Secre- tary Costanzo noted that they are a couple of thousand feet in excess of what the Sign Ordinance will allow. Mr. Finkelberg noted that they have removed all other signing and that the new sign will only be 200 square feet. Sec- retary Costanzo noted that all signs in excess of 100 square feet are only allowed with a Use Permit. Secretary Costanzo noted that the Planning Commission originally approved the sign located outside of the public right-of-way, but that the City Council allowed it to be placed in the right-of-way. He noted that the new sign copy would create a structural alteration to the sign and that the increased wind loads and maximum sign area indicated a structural change. Commissioner Goldberg asked Wtl~{t the outcome of the last Planning Commission hearing on this matter was. Secretary Costanzo noted that staff recommended denial and that the Planning Commission upheld this. Mr. Peterson noted that one condition of the previous use permit was that the roof sign be taken down and that this has been done voluntarily, but that it had contained all the identification for the International Inn Restaurant, and he felt business was suffering from this lack of signing. - 3724 - UP-77-378, cont1d ~1arch 22, 1977 Commissioner Mathewson noted that he did not see how the Commission could approve the sign with it standing in the right-of-way. Commissioner Mathewson moved to deny UP-77-378. Commissioner Mullin seconded the motion and UP-77-378 was denied by a unanimous roll call vote. UP-77-379 An application of Charles Petrocchi to const~l:ict a sit down and drive through restaurant at 575 El Camino in the "U" Unclassified Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that the restaurant in question is a Burger King. Proponents: Charles Petrocchi 396 Ashford San Carlos, CA Bill Bishop, representing Burger King 335 King Mountain Road Woodside, CA Speakers: Mr. Bill Schneider Member of the audience Mr. Bishop noted his concern with Condition #9 relating to slump stone wall around the property. He noted that this would be very expensive and that R. B. Furniture already has a wall and it would not look good to have two walls. He also noted his concern with Condition #10 relating to the wall around the P.G.& E. right-of-way which would cost him around $40,000. He also noted, relative to Condition #5, that he wants the wood parapet and that it could be boxed and made a part of the roof structure. He noted that the freestanding sign of 50 square feet and 15 feet high is very small. He expressed concern with school children destroying the sign. Secretary Costanzo noted that he would have no objection to the sign being 64 square feet, but that he would like to see the "Drive-Through" portion of the freestanding sign removed. Mr. Bishop reiterated that he objected to the six foot high wall. Commis- sioner Mathewson noted that the requirement is 20 feet back from the side- walk and is also through the Burger King drive-through area and that the Commission is concerned with the back area. Mr. Schneider asked what the ratio is of parking spaces to seating spaces. Secreta.r?yi\.Costanzo noted that the sit down is 1-50, non-sit down is 1-200 and additional parking is provided at the drive-through window. He noted there will be a total parking of 59 spaces and that this exceeds the require- ments. Mr. Schneider noted that the Commission should consider that it is on a corner and some concern with traffic should be given. - 3725 - UP-77-379. cO,nt I d ~1arch 22, 1977 Commissioner Goldberg asked how many employees Burger King would have. Mr. Bishop noted 13-14 for lunch, six or seven for the afternoon and 12- 15 for supper. He noted that would be a maximum figure, taking the weekends into accolin't. Commissioner Campredon commented on the fact that the doors faced north which seems likely that they would be heading directly into the wind. The Commission noted that they wanted the lighted parapet removed. They further deleted Condition #10 relating to the 30 foot parking strip. They further amended Special Condition #5 to read: "...constructed in the roof area in a design subject to the approval of the Architectural Committee with the deletion of the words "Home of the Whopper. II Special Condition #11 was added: "That the parapet shall not be constructed of plastics or lighted and that a wood parapet shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Architectural Committee." Special Condition #6 was changed from "50 square feet" to 64 square feet and from "15 feet high" to "16 feet high." Commissioner Hullin asked if a "U" turn at El Camino and Ponderosa would present a problem. City Engineer Yee stated that no more than exists with other intersections. €ommissioner Mathewson moved that the Planning Commission approve UP-77-379 subject to all of the conditions and limitations of the staff report with the above listed changes and additions. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Commissioner Godlberg moved that the Planning Commission reviewed and accepted the Negative Declaration and adopted the findings of the staff report. Commissioner Campredon seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. PM-77-l39 An application of Gamlen Chemical Company for a Tentative Parcel Map to re- subdivide an 86,000+ parcel into two smaller parcels at 211,213 and 215 South Maple Avenue in the M-l Light Industrial Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report. Proponent: John Tealdi Callan Realty Opponent: None Mr. Tealdi noted to the Commission that they would comply with all of the conditions of the staff report. - 3726 - PM-77-139, cont'd March 22, 1977 Commissioner Bertucelli moved that the Planning Commission reviewed and accepted the Negative Declaration and adopted the findings of the staff report and that the Commission approve PM-77-139 subject to the conditions and limitations of the staff report. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. SA-76-32 An application by Leo Fratessa for a Final Subdivision Map (Stonegate lA) to create 14 condominium air space units on the southeast corner of Hillside Boulevard and Chestnut Avenue on Stonegate Drive. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting to the Commission that the Final Map was substantially in compliance with the Tentative Map previously approved by the Commission. The Commission unanimously approved SA-76-32 as being substantially in compliance with the Tendi:ative Subdivision Map. SA-76-35 An application by Gemini Developers, Inc. for a Final Subdivision Map (West Park Unit 3F) for the construction of 42 townhouse units at the northeast corner of Callan Boulevard and Greendale Drive. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting to the Commission that the Final Map was substantially in compliance with the Tentative Map pre- viously approved by the Commission. The Commission unanimously approved SA-76-35 as being substantially in com- pliance with~the Tentative Map. COMMUNICATIONS Secretary Costanzo noted to the Commission that the LAFCO matter related to Gellert Boulevard would go to the City Council on April 6. He also noted that the Sphere of Influence study was approved by LAFCO for the San Bruno Mountain area and that a report back to LAFCO was due by June or July. Secretary Costanzo noted that the Colina developers are on notice to remove their signs by April 1st, and if they do not, then the City will remove them. There was some discussion on a doctor operating her business out of her home. Secretary Costanzo indicated that the City Attorney had approved this business license for that location in 1961 which became a legal nonconforming use in 1966 with the adoption of the Home Occupation Ordinance. He noted that such an ordinance was not in existence at the time this use was established. - 3727 - Communications, cont'd ~1arch 22, 1977 Commissioner ~1athewson asked if there had been a review process by the City Attorney. Secretary Costanzo noted even though there was not a Home Occupa- tion Ordinance at that time, there were home businesses. He noted that the business has been operating for 16 years and that it is a saleable business. The Commission requested staff to see if anything can be done legally to have this business operation moved to a more suitable location. Commissioner Mathewson noted that Open Road North & South are both closed and that it has been six months and there is a sign in that location not in use. Secretary Costanzo noted that SamTrans stores thej.ti' buses at that location and have an agreement with the City that they will keep up the landscaping. He noted, however, that SamTrans will be moving the location for storage of buses and will not invest any more money in that site. Commi ssd:oner Ma thewson noted tha t there is another sign in tha t area tha t readsIAvailable". Secretary Costanzo noted that he would check into this. GOOD AND WELFARE Vice-Chairman Teglia noted that she has received complaints on two develop- ments that have gone through architectural control. She noted that one is an apartment complex on Willow and the other is an office building on Mission Road which looks very bad. She felt maybe the Architectural Committee..was nQ~..Cl~ar~.gt~g.~.t....t.he C9rnmis?i..9U.~~n~:9........ ..Secre.~..~rX..S.9s tanzo.s~9.9.e~~ed'li~ha t he.....Ic.ome.........bCl,~.~ . to.\the.' Commi-s'sfon;withiwttcompl eteges'igm. criteria>i nwr;:tten form and that each application be brought to the Commission, not for review, but only for them to see what has occurred. He also noted that the actions of the Architectural Committee could be brought to the Commission. Commis- sioner Mathewson suggested that there be a joint meeting between the Architectural Committee and the Planning Commission. Secretary Costanzo agreed that this would be beneficial. Commissioner Teglia asked that each Commissioner go by the development on Willow before the next meeting. She also noted that this apartment complex had potential, but had turned out badly. Secretary Costanzo noted to the Commission that the City has hired a Senior Planner, Dan Christians, under contract for one year and that he would be starting on April 4. There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare and no other communications or matters of interest for the Commission, Chairman Slade announced that the next regular meeting would be held on April 12, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., in the West Orange Library Auditorium. The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m. ~I'A. . / U{1(f{am Planning Commissi City of South San Wesley Slade, Chairman Planning Commission City of South San Francisco Francisco - 3728 - March 22, 1977 NOTE: The entries of this Planning Commission meeting indicate the action taken to dispose of each item. Oral presentations, arguments and documents are recorded on tape. The tapes are available in the office of the City Planner. Documents related to the items discussed are on file in the office of the City Planner and are available for public inspection. - 3729 -