Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/09/1976 M I NUT E S of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission TIME: 8:00 P.M. DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1976 PLACE: WEST ORANGE LIBRARY AUDITORIUM MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli, Goldberg, Mathewson, Mullin and Chairman Slade MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Hale ALSO PRESENT: Acting City Planner William Costanzo Assistant Planner Mark Wheeler Pl~nning Division Secretary Pamela J. Bayer Acting Director of Public Services Robert Yee Chief Building Inspector Roy Ghilardi Fire Marshal Arthur Maguire MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of October 26, 1976 Commissioner Bertucelli moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of October 26, 1976, be approved. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Goldberg and was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli and Goldberg NOES: None ABSENT: Commiss~oners Hale and Mullin (Arrived Late) ABSTAI NED: Commi ssi oner ~1athewson and Cha i rman Sl ade ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING Chairman Slade announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be recorded on tape, but that anyone who wished to come before the Commission to be heard, but who objected to having his or her voice recorded in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned lIoffll for the duration of the time that he or she is speaking or is heard. - 3649 00; November 9, 1976 UP-76-355 UP-76-355, a request of Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation for a Use Permit to construct a dining room addition into an existing restaurant at 435 El Camino Real in the C-l Neighborhood Commercial Zone District. Chairman Slade opened the public hearing. Secretary Costanzo noted that staff and the applicant would like this matter continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 14, 1976, to allow more time for some of the problems to be resolved. Vice-Chairman Teglia moved that UP-76-355 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 14, 1976. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. UP-76-361 UP-76-36l, a request of Whis1er-Patri for a Use Permit to construct 42 single family residential units on property located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Callan Boulevard and Greendale Drive and on Palos Verdes Way in the Planned Community Zone District. Secretary Costanzo noted to the Commission that this agenda item was being withdrawn by the applicant because of an inadequate property owners. list, in that a number of property owners were not notified of the public hearing. He further stated that this agenda item would be brought back to the Commission as soon as Whisler-Patri submitted an up-dated property owners I 1 i st. UP-76-362 UP-76-362, a request of Al Agresti for a Use Permit to remove and recon- struct in a new location one unit in an existing duplex at 114-116 First Street and 114-116 IIBII Street in the R-2 Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the Special Conditions. Proponent: Al Agresti 10 Willow Lane Belmont, CA 94002 Opponent: None Mr. Agresti noted that the old apartment required too much work to bring up to code and that by tearing it out, he could redecorate the rst building and build an addition onto the back. He further stated that the apartment does not now have a garage, but there will be space for approxi- mately six cars if the addition could be built and the first building redecorated. - 3650 ... UP-76-362, contld November 9, 1976 Commissioner Mathewson requested to know what was being done about the 20 foot rear yard setback. Secretary Costanzo explained that there are five nonconforming parcels with four units built on them and that the code will not allow separating these parcels for sale, so they are considered one piece of property. He further explained that the rear yard is that portion of Lot 24 to the rear of the units i~entified as 114-116, which is non- conforming. Commissioner Mathewson requested to know the total square footage of the unit itself. Secretary Cos~anzo noted that it is 1012 square feet. Commissioner Mathewson requested that Special Condition #6 be added to read: IIThat lots 24, 26, 28, 30 and 32, shall be deleted via the parcel map procedure to create one larger parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit.1I Commissioner Mathewson moved that UP-76-362 be approved subject to the conditions of the staff report and the addition of Sp~~ri'al Condition #6. Vice-Chairman Teglia seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. (Commissioner Mullin - Absent) UP-76-338 (MODIFIED) UP-76-338, Modified, a request of Mann Investment Company to amend one unit of the 14 single family residences approved as part of a Planned Unit Development/Subdivision located at the southeast corner of Hillside and Chestnut on Storre~~te Drive in the Planned Community Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the Special Conditions, noting the addition of Condition #36 within the text of the staff report which reads as follows: #36: That Exhibit IIAII be amended to delete one type two unit and to replace said unit with a revised type 6 unit, subject to the approval of the City1s Architectural Committee as to the exterior treatment of the proposed unit.1I Proponents: Mr. Bob Smith Mann Investment Company 39 Cliffside Drive Daly City, CA 94015 Al Seyranian, representing the applicant Opponents: Eugene Aven, president of Stonegate Ridge Association #1 848 Stonegate Drive South San Francisco, CA Robert Mayerson 844 Larch South San Francisco, CA - 3651 - UP-76-338, Modified, cont'd November 9, 1976 Mike Gatlin 816 Larch South San Francisco, CA Joyce Mayerson 844 Larch South San Francisco, CA Mr. Smith noted that Mann Investment Company had gotten together with the Hom~Dwnersl Association and that they agreed to change the one unit from type two to type six. Mr. Mayerson noted his concern with traffic on Hillside Boulevard being increased by the additional 14 units. He noted that traffic on Hillside is already tremendous and that he would like to know what could be done to alleviate the problems. Secretary Costanzo explained to the Commission that there had been an agreement between Mann Investments and the Homeowners' Association which has to do with an appeal and the withdrawal of that appeal by the Home- owners' Association based on the agreement made between these two groups. He further noted that the City is now being placed in a position of enforcing an agreement between these two groups, but that staff still supports this project. Mr. Aven noted to the Commission some of the problems he saw with the plans submitted by Mann Investment Company. He said that the plan limits the number of vehicles, reducing it by half, and that there is no off-street parking there. He noted that the parking is now down to one parking space per home and that it was agreed that there would be two vehicles per home. Secretary Costanzo noted that to increase cover- age with driveways and parking would not be possible without amending the entire Stonegate text. He noted that the Planning Commission could require additional parking, however, this cannot be done because it would be violating the Stonegate Ridge General Plan and Planned Unit Development and would violate the terms and conditions of the Ordinance placed on that property. He explained that the reason this is before the Commission tonight is because it is a modification of the Stonegate Ridge Plan by changing this one unit. The text would have to be amended to allow greater than 50 percent coverage on the property. He explained that by putting up two-car garages, as Mr. Aven requested, it would be taking away the guarantees of the P.U.D. on this site and it would reduce open space to below 50 percent which means that the text of the plan would have to be amended. He further explained what a Planned Unit Development consists of. Mr. Aven requested that these carports be closed garages so that they do not look like lean-to IS. Mr. Seyranian, representing the applicant, noted that the carports were put in to give a more open feeling to the area, to give more light and air to the entranceways to the units, rather than closing them off. Mr. Gatlin asked if in addition to the carport, there would be room for two additional cars. - 3652 - UP-76-338, modified, contld November 9, 1976 Ms. Mayerson asked for some comments from the City Engineer as to what could be done to alleviate the traffic problems on Hillside which dras- tically affect the residents of Sterling Terrace who have trouble at the present time in getting out onto Hillside. City Engineer Yee stated that Hillside is a collector street and that this particular development of 14 units would have an impact which would not be significant. He explained that he does not know what the present traffic count on Hillside Boulevard would be, but that the project would increase traffic by about 100 cars onto the streets per day. Mr. Yee stated that there is no formula for alleviating the traffic problems on Hillside. He stated that he knows there is heavy traffic on Hillside and that stop signs could be put on every corner, but that this is not feasible since Hillside is a collector street. Commissioner Mathewson noted that the past policy of the Planning Commis- sion in regard to developments was that they have closed carports. Secretary Costanzo said that that was correct. Commissioner Mathewson asked if this was considered or would be considered under Architectural Committee review. Secretary Costanzo noted that there is a policy on Stonegate Ridge to allow carports, and that he does not know what the Architectural Committee1s position will be. Mr. Aven noted that the closed garage was a negotiated item and that there are homes up there that have carports and closed garages side by side. Secretary Costanzo noted that staff has no objection to having closed garages in this area. He further stated that this is a new design and that he can require the garages to be closed and can ask the Architectural Committee to determine which would enhance the appearance more--the carport or the closed garage. Commissioner Mathewson requested to know if it would be feasible for Mann Investment Company to consider closing the carports. Mr. Smith noted that they would give it some consideration. Vice-Chairman Teglia voiced some concern with there being only three guest parking spaces for these units. She stated that if the parking require- ment was four 1/4 spaces per unit and there were 14 units, that would bring guest parking spaces to 3-1/2. Secretary Costanzo stated that he did not know where the guest parking spaces have been provided and if they have been maintained and that he would have to check back on the original develop- ment, but that Phase 1 and 2 have been done in substantial compliance with that plan. He noted that he assumed that the Master Plan represents the text of the Stonegate Ridge P.U.D. He further stated that there would be meetings with the developers to amend the text and Master Plan for Stone- gate Ridge to have all of them comply with all the City codes. Secretary Costanzo further noted that the 1/4 parking space for guest parking would be addressed both administratively and at the Architectural Committee level. He said that to his knowledge, they met the requirements of the Stonegate Plan. - 3653 - UP-76-338, Modified, cont1d November 9, 1976 Commissioner Goldberg moved that the modification of UP-76-338 be approved subject to all the previous conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli, Goldberg, Mathewson and Chairman Slade None Commissioner Mullin Commissioner Hale UP-76-363 UP-76-363, a request of Mary Leon and Enidina Leon for a Use Permit to con- struct a second multiple family dwelling on property located at 433 Commer- cial Avenue in the R-3 Restricted Multiple Family Zone District. Secretary Costanzo explained that he had received a letter from Mary and Enidina Leon requesting that this agenda item be withdrawn. UP-76-364 UP-76-364, a request of Bud Fratessa (Stewart Title) for a Use Permit to construct 48 residential units in 12 buildings on vacant property located on the north side of Stonegate Drive, approximately 200 feet east of Hillside Avenue in the Planned Community Zone District. Chairman Slade opened the public hearing. Secretary Costanzo noted that the Engineering Divi,sion did not haves~'f,f'dcient time to review the Sub- division Application relating to this agenda item and that the Use Permit application should not be approved before reviewing the Subdivision Appli- ca t ion. Commissioner Bertucelli moved that UP-76-364 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of November 23, 1976. Commissioner Goldberg seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. UP-76-365 UP-76-365, a request of Weathermaster Industries, Inc. for a Use Permit to construct a room addition between the existing house and garage on property located at 3816 Callan Boulevard in the Planned Community Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the special conditions. The applicant was not present at the meeting. - 3654 - UP-76-365, contid November 9, 1976 There was some discussion on the fact that the applicant was not present and the possibility of setting a precedent by approving the application without the applicant being present. Several Commissioners felt that under these particular circumstances, approving the application without the applicant being present would not really be setting a precedent because it was a very routine type of appli- cation, of which several similar applications have already been approved by the Commission. Commissioner Mathewson moved that UP-76-365 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of January 11,1976. ThiEs motion died because of a lack of a second. Secretary Costanzo noted that there is no legal reason not to take action on this matter, but that if there are questions to the applicant, then it should be continued to a future date. Commissioner Mathewson moved that UP-76-365 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 14, 1976, when the applicant could be present. Commissioner Goldberg seconded the motion and it failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Goldberg and Mathewson NOES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Be~tucelli and Mullin and Chairman Slade ABSENT: CommiSsioner Hale Commissioner Mullin moved that UP-76-365 be approved subject to all of the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli and Mullin and Chairman Slade NOES: Commissioners Goldberg and Mathewson ABSENT: Commissioner Hale UP-76-366 UP-76-366, a request of TraveLodge/International Inn for a Use Permit to replace the existing International Inn signs for new TraveLodge signs on property located at 326 South Airport Boulevard in the M-2-H Zone Districte Sec~etary Costanzo presented the staff report, illustrating the locations and copy on the proposed signs. Further, he head into the record the special conditions. - 3655 - UP-76-366, cont1d November 9, 1976 Proponents: Mr. Robert Sherman, representing the applicant 1611 Borel Place San Mateo, CA Randy Peterson, General Manager TraveLodge/lnternationa1 Inn 326 South Airport Boulevard South San Francisco, CA Opponents: None Mr Sherman noted to the Commission that he was not aware of some of the complications until receiving the staff report. He said there were problems involved which the applicant, being a lessee, does not have the jurisdiction to negotiate on. He stated that the most important thing is that they have identification, so they withdrew everything from the application with the exception of the name change on the main sign. Secretary Costanzo noted that the applicant still has to go through this process to amend the copy of this sign and that he feels it is a struc- tural alteration of this sign. He noted that in any case a review of this copy change would entail a review of all the signs on the site. Sign #2 cannot be approved in the right-of-way and that a variance cannot be ob- tained for that sign. He noted that projections into the right-of-way cannot be over four feet. He further noted that there cannot be an off-site advertising sign and that the sign advertising Standard Oil should be re- moved as it is illegal and redundant. Mr. Sherman reiter~~eD that the applicant has no power to negotiate the other changes. Secretary Costanzo noted that the problem lies in the fact that these signs were approved before the Sigh Ordinance. He further noted that he could ignore the other signs on the site and approve the Use Permit for this copy change since it was approved originally under a Use Permit. Mr. Randy Peterson noted to the Commission that the restaurant will be the International Inn still and that the hotel will be operated under the name TraveLodge, but that they are both owned by the same party. He noted that the owner must negotiate with the applicant and with Standard Oil Company. Vice-Chairman Teglia requested to know how the original sign came into being. Assistant Planner Wheeler stated that the Planning Commission approved 50 square feet and that the sign was allowed to continue as a nonconforming sign. Vice-Chairman Teglia requested to know how much it would cost to have the sign removed. Mr. Sherman noted that it would cost $40,000 today. Commissioner Mathewson noted that the TraveLodge in Hawaii had no problem with no signing and that the City should not have to conform to TraveLodge. Mr. Finkelberg with Heath and Company noted that what is done in Hawaii should have no bearing on what is needed in California. - 3656 - UP-76-366, contld November 9, 1976 Commissioner Goldberg asked if there were no request, then they could continue with this sign forever with the sign in the right-of-way and the City could no nothing about it. Secretary Costanzo noted that this was correct. He further noted that the request to relocate this sign came from the applicant and that when he found out the problems involved, he withdrew it. Commissioner Goldberg requested to know if the changes or improvements on Airport Boulevard would have an effect on the location of that sign. City Engineer Yee stated that the proposed Airport Boulevard improvements start at Utah Avenue and was approved five or six years ago. Vi ce.-Cha i rman Tegl i a requested to know wha t woul d happen to the roof sign. Mr. Sherman noted that it would be removed. He further stated that on sign #4, they proposed to remove everything with the exception of the pole containing the Standard Oil Company advertising. Mr. Peterson noted to the Commission that his lease expires in 1991. Commissioner Goldberg asked, relating to sign #2, if the applicant would consider expanding the square footage of the sign itself. Mr. Sherman noted that this was originally intended. Secretary Co~tanzo noted that there was no objection to that as long as the sign was moved out of the right-of-way. Secretary Costanzo also noted that sign #2 should be removed from the right-of-way, but that they can leave this sign alone because it was originally approved by a separate use permit. Vice-Chairman Teglia noted that Special Conditions #3 and #6 seem to be the problems. Commissioner Mullin suggested changing condition #6 to read that this sign shall be removed upon expiration of the lease. Mr. Sherman noted that they would agree to remove the roof sign. Commissioner Bertucelli noted that sign #1 is important and that Special Condition #1 should be imposed, but that all others should be left alone at the present time, to be removed upon completion of the lease. Commissioner Mullin moved that UP-76-366 be approved subject to all of the standard conditions and special conditions with the exception that Special Condition #3 be deleted and Special Condition #6 be changed to read: IIThat the Standard Oil portion of the sign shall be removed upon the expiration of the lease agreement between International Inn, Inc., and Standard Oil Company or any future property owner.1I Mr. Sherman noted his agreement to all of the special conditions with the exceptions of #3, #4 and #6. He noted that conditions #3 and #4 should be deleted and condition #6 changed to read as above. Commissioner Mathewson asked that changes should be made to the pertinent section in the Sign Ordinance. Secretary Costanzo noted that he felt this section was alright, bWDi:Ethat they needed a whole new Sign Ordinance - 3657 - UP-76-366, cont1d November 9, 1976 Commissioner Mullin changed his motion to delete Special Conditions #3 and #4 and to change Special Condition #6 as above. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. PM-76-136 PM-76-136, a request of Gemini Developers, Inc. for a Tentative Parcel Map to create four lots at the northeasterly corner of Callan Boulevard and Greendale Avenue in the PC-SF Planned Community Single-Family Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the special conditions. Proponent: Mr. Ronald Setti 1500 Hillside Boulevard Calma, CA 94014 Opponents: None Mr. Setti explained the basic outline of the project. Secretary Costanzo explained that the City is involved with an attempt on the part of the Church to separate themselves from the activities of the developer because they would be placed in the position of being a sub- divider which could affect their tax status. Commissioner Mathewson requested to know why the Parcel Map and Subdivision Application steps were necessary. Secretary Costanzo explained that it is a requirement of the Subdivision Map Act in that without a parcel map they would have to incorporate the lands of the Roman Catholic Arch~~~hop in the Subdivision Application. The Archbishop would have difficulty with his tax consultants if that were required. The intent is to take the Church out of the total subdivision. Secretary Costanzo gave the Commission a brief history on this Parcel Map. Commissioner Mathewson asked if it was correct that Parcel B-4 basically related to the dedication to the street. City Engineer Yee stated that this was correct. Commissioner Goldberg moved that PM-76-137 be approved subject to all of the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli, Goldberg, Mathewson, and Chairman Slade NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Hale and Mullin (Left at 10:40 p.m.) - 3658 - November 9, 1976 SA-76-35 SA-76-35, a request of Gemini Developers. Inc., for a Tentative Subdivision Application to create 42 townhouse lots at the northeasterly corner of Callan Boulevard and Greenda1e Drive in the PC-SF Planned Community Single Family Zone District. Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the conditions of the staff report and of the City Engineerls office, as well as some of the conditions relating to the Alquist-Priolo Act and grading. Proponent: Mr. Ronald Setti 1500 Hillside Boulevard Colma, CA 94014 Opponents: Mr. Frank Lehane 3724 Palos Verdes Way South San Francisco, CA Chairman Slade asked if the conditions had been discussed with the applicant2 Secretary Costanzo noted that they had been discussed at length with Mr. Tronoff, the engineer for Gemini Developers. City Engineer Yee stated that the original Condition #1 of his memo should be ~eplaced with a condition reading that two subdivision maps should be submitted because two of the lots are non-contiguous and that the parcel map be recorded prior to the recordation of the Subdivision Map. Mr. Frank Lehane, a resident in the area, noted to the Commission that he is very concerned with dust problems from construction and that he would like to see that the dust control measures are adhered to. Commissioner Goldberg requested to know what the requirement for common greens is. Secretary Costanzo noted that 51.7 percent of the total land area is to be in common greens. He further noted that this requirement is built into the Planned Community. Commissioner Goldberg asked what the unit types would be. Mr. Setti noted they would be single family. Chairman Slade noted to Mr. Setti that in relation to the C.C.& R. IS and the Associations, he should be familiar with the process of the transition of power from the developer to the Association and hopefully with minimal amounts of friction. Mr. Setti noted that he was going to contact the Associations in the area. Commissioner Teglia suggested that ~1r. Setti knock on doors to find out all the information he can relating to this. Commissioner Goldberg asked if there would be drainage problems in this area with grading since it is below the church parking lot. Secretary Costanzo noted that this situation is being considered and mitigation measures imposed. Commissioner Goldberg moved that SA-76-35 be approved subject to the con- ditions of the staff report with the above change in the first condition of the City Engineer. - 3659 - SA-76-35, cont'd November 9, 1976 Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Vice-Chairman Teglia, Commissioners Bertucelli, Goldberg, and Chairman Slade NOES: Commissioner Mathewson ABSENT: Commissioners Hale and Mullin COMMUNICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2197 Resolution commending David C. Hale for his dedicated services as Secretary to the Planning Commission. Commissioner GoldbeD9 moved to waive the reading of the resolution. Vice- Chairman Teglia seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Commissioner Mathewson introduced Resolution No. 2197 and it was adopted by a unanimous roll call vote. P.G.& E. SUBSTATION Secretary Costanzo presented a staff report discussing the~roposed P.G.& E. power plant on the Healy-Tibbitts property and asked for direction from the Planning Commission to hire consultants to review this request, to send a representative to the hearing scheduled for December 2, 1976, and to formally protest the limited amount of time afforded by the S.E.R.C.D.C. for the review of this proposal. Mr. Edward Chaloupaa, site engineer for P.G.&. E. stated that he was respon- sible for choosing the four sites for the possible location of the P.G.& E. power plant substation. He made several comments on the staff report as follows: 1. He did not think the power plant would loom over the harbor and that the steam flume will not damage boa.ts by contamina- tion. It may be a condition of that site to have a wet towel drying system, thereby eliminating the flume. The fact that the harbor is a noise sensitive area would be taken into consideration to meet noise level standards. 2. He noted that they would use a tubular steel pole to hold up the transmission lines which would be more in compliance with the clean lines of the industrial park. - 3660 - P.G.&_E. Substation, cont'd November 9, 1976 3. He noted that they are now aware of the new B.A.P.C.D. standards relating to critical air quality problems. He noted that the plant could be designed so that it complied with the requirements of air quality control. He further stated that he is aware that the Bay Area is a critical air basin and if there are violations of primary standards on air quality or contributions from the plant on continued violations, the plant could not be built. 4. In regard to the fill area, he noted that they have done a literature review of everything available and have tried to determine what geotechnical problems there might be and to come up with the solutions to these problems. 5. He noted that he felt since this area is designated for open space, the number of persons employed there versus the number of people that might be employed if this were an industrial parcel is not an issue. 6. He noted that the estimate of how much water peri~inute is correct--about 3,035 GPM, however, that it was possible that they could use municipal wastewater. He fuy'ther explained that the general purpose of coming before the City is to determine the goals of the City and to determine what the positive and negative impacts would be to come to sowe conclusion as to whether or not it would be worthy of further consideration for the power plant. He noted that the first set of hearings would be on December 2, 1976. Commissioner Mathewson asked Mr. Chaloupaa what the height of the two towers would be. Mr. Chaloupaa noted that the cooling tower would be the highest structure and would be about 40 to 55 feet. Secretary Costanzo said that P.G.& E. was going to build a jet peaking fa.cility and supply the fuel by barging from San Francisco Bay. He noted that this was the original premise and that this premise is now gone because the whole reason for the facility was to build a jet peaking facility with barging of fuel as the water related use. Secretary Costanzo noted that the City is basically interested in learning what effects this plant will have on South San Francisco and what can be done to mitigate these effects. Commissioner Goldberg requested to know what happens to all this water when the process is finished. Mr. Chaloupaa noted that in a cooling tower, you are evaporating water and leaving behind minerals, etcetera, which will go to the Treatment Plant. Commissioner Goldberg then requested to know if an ErR procedure would follow after the site is chosen. Mr. Chaloupaa noted that it would. wGmmissioner Mathewson noted that the switch yard is visually unacceptable. -, 3661 - November 9, 1 Commissioner Goldberg noted that there would be a large problem with ectrolysis, which already exists. Chairman Slade expressed his concerns with the time frame. He felt there was not enough time to get together and establish the City's position. Mr. Chaloupaa noted that the first set of hearings are too close to do anything positive. He stated that he does not know when the proper time would be to receive input from the City. He did state that the first hearings may not require the City's final comments to be put forth and may just require input from P.G.& E. and the State agency. He suggested contacting the State Energy Commission to determine the time schedule. The Commission wanted to know what happens to the pistol range since it is in the shoreline area. Mr. Chaloupaa noted that this would be taken into consideration. There being nothing to consider under Good and Welfare and no other communications or matters of interest for the Commission, Chairman Slade announced that the next meeting of the Planning Commission would be the field trip scheduled for November 13, 1976, at 9:30 a.m. at the City Hall Conference Room. The meeting was adjounned at 1:00 a.m. Wesley Slade, Chairman Planning Commission City of South San Francisco ~stanzo. Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Francisco NOTE: The entries of this Planning Commission meeting indicate the action taken to dispose of each item. Oral presentations, arguments and documents are recorded on tape. The tapes are available in the office of the City Planner. Documents related to the items discussed are on file in the office of the City Planner and are available for public inspection. - 3662 -