HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/13/1979
M I NUT E S
of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
DATE: March 13, 1979
PLACE: WEST ORANGE LIBRARY AUDITORIUM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Campredon, Vice-Chairman Mantegani, Commissioners
Bertucelli, Martin, Getz, Grimes and Hoyer
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT:
City Planner
William Costanzo
Senior Planner
Daniel B. Christians
Assistant Planner
Mark A. Wheeler
Ci ty Engi neer
Robert S. Yee
Chief Building Inspector
Roy Ghilardi
Community Relations Officer
John Moran
Prior to opening the meeting, Secretary Costanzo swore in the newly appointed
Commissioner, Charles Getz. Newly appointed Commissioners Louis Martin and
Herman Hoyer, having been sworn in previously by the City Clerk, Margaret
Pettigrew, were duly recognized and welcomed by Chairman Campredon.
Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 27, 1979
Commissioner Grimes moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the
South San Francisco Planning Commission of February 27, 1979, be approved.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bertuce,li and was passed by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Chairman Campredon, Vice-Chairman Mantegani, Commissioners
Bertucelli, Martin and G~imes
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: Commissioners Getz and Hoyer
ABSENT: None
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING
Announcement was made that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning
Commission would be recorded on tape, and that anyone who wished to come be-
fore the Commission to be heard is requested to come to the front microphone
so that his or her comments become part of the official record.
-4087-
March 13, 1979
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
UP-79-476
and
Categorical Exemption
An application by Colina II for a Use Permit to continue the use of existing
sales signs on property located at #1 Appian Way in the R-3 Zone District.
Staff presented the staff report.
Mr. Carl Christopher, Representative of Colina
Mr. Christopher indicated his acceptance of the conditions as stated with
the exception of relocation of sign D. Mr. Christopher further stated his
intention to remove the bank financing sign.
Commissioner Getz moved that UP-79-476 and Categorical Exemption be approved
subject to all recommendations. Commissioner Martin seconded the motion and
it was approved by a unanimous roll call vote.
UP-79-477
and
Categorical Exemption
An application by Sergio L. Sanchez for a Use Permit to establish an "0n-
sale" establishment where liquor is served in conjunction with a proposed
restaurant on developed property located at 128 Brentwood Drive in the C-l
Zone District.
Staff presented the staff report updating the Commission on the current
status of this item.
As recommended in the staff report, Commissioenr Bertucelli motioned that
UP-79-477 and Categorical Exemption be tabled and continued off-calendar.
Commissioner Martin seconded the motion and it was passed by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Chairman Campredon, Vice-Chairman Mantegani, Commissioners
Bertucelli, Martin, Grimes and Hoyer
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: Commissioner Getz
ABSENT: None
Discussion followed regarding the critical parking problems existing at this
location and the effects on other businesses in the area.
Commissioner Getz indicated for the record that he would abstain from any
-4088-
March 13, 1979
action on this matter because he was not previously involved.
Further discussion followed pertaining to the intensification of the non-
conforming land use being the main objection in this case as well as any
similar future requests at the Brentwood Shopping Center.
UP-78-454
and
Categorical Exemption
An application by Omar Grimes for a Use Permit to modify original Planning
Commission determination pertaining to U-Haul business identification in
conjunction with the existing gasoline service station at 998 El Camino Real
in the C~l Zone District.
Staff presented the staff report.
Chairman Campredon recommended that this item be continued to the regular
Planning Commission meeting of March 27, 1979, and Union Oil Company Use
Permit (UP-76-369) also be heard at the meeting of March 27, 1979.
The Commission concurred.
UP-78-469
and
Categorical Exemption
A progress report on the Use Permit application of Classic Van approved on
December 12, 1978, to establish a light manufacturing facility at 105 Linden
Avenue in the C-2 Zone District.
Mr. Marshall Bloss, Representative and owner of Classic Van
Mr. Bloss indicated that his business needed the use of the adjacent gas
station for parking of his vans. He further indicated that since acquiring
the property in the rear, the vans are not causing any traffic hazard.
Mr. John Moran, Community Relations Officer, stated that the van parked on
the subject property the day of his inspection did in fact cause a traffic
hazard. He further indicated that the van has since been relocated.
Discussion followed in regards to the use of the adjacent parcel and the in-
tentions regarding the previous Planning Commission recommendation which was
the basis for the approval granted to operate this business. (See Special
Conditions of approval dated December 12, 1978.
Mr. Roy Ghilardi, Chief Building Inspector, indicated that the Fire Depart-
ment would have to approve the heat detector system that has been installed
for compliance with the Uniform Building Code.
-4089-
March 13, 1979
Discussion followed regarding the manufacturing of cabinets and the hazards
involved to the surrounding properties.
Discussion continued pertaining to landscaping along the public right-of-way.
Staff clarified the obvious situation that the applicant has no intention of
complying with the code requirements or any part of the Use Permit as pre-
viously approved.
Mr. Bloss stated that his cabinet operation would be relocated as soon as he
could financially afford to support a relocation of this nature.
Staff further agreed upon Planning Commission direction to meet with the ap-
plicant in an effort to resolve this matter.
Commissioners Grimes and Getz concurred that theapplicant1s contempt for the
laws regulating his business are the basis for discontinuation of this fruit-
less discussion.
Staff clarified that the issue here tonight is headed straight to a court of
law and a basis for a contempt of court ruling by the presiding judge as well
as a misdemeanor violation of the Zoning Ordinance and Uniform Building Code.
Further discussion followed pertaining to the established use and the effects
on the surrounding area.
Commissioner Bertucelli moved that UP-78-469 and Categorical Exemption be
revoked. Vice-Chairman Mantegani seconded the motion and it was passed by a
unanimous roll call vote.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
EIR-79-6
A public hearing for the Sierra Point Development Co. on the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report (DEIR) for construction of a proposed residential con-
dominium/light industrial/commercial office complex (UP-79-475) located on
the easterly side of Highway 101 and the Southern Pacific Railroad main track
line immediately adjacent to the northern limit line of the City of South San
Francisco in the M-2 Zone District.
Staff presented the staff report.
Staff expalined the procedure to proceed with the public hearing tonight.
Staff indicated tonight1s meeting was for the sole purpose of taking public
and Planning Commission comments only on the D.E.I.R. being considered to-
night.
Staff indicated their concerns at this point as well as their interest in the
comments received and on file at this time.
-4090-
March 13, 1979
Mr. Jim Keegan
Mr. Keegan indicated that no copies of the document were available to the public
nor was there any notice of the meeting tonight.
Staff clarified that all proper legal requirements had been met to the fullest
extent.
Commissioner Getz requested staff to make a special effort to contact the local
newspaper to make this public hearing known.
Mr. Jerry Rogers, Urban Projects
11777 San Vincente Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Mr. Rogers indicated his firm's desire to move ahead with the public comment
at this meeting. He further stated that the D.E.I.R. was completed in ac-
cordance with all City requirements and that his staff and representatives of
the applicants are present to answer any questions.
There being no comments from the public, the Commission continued the public
hearing.
Commissioner Getz requested the following comments be addressed to the D.E.I.R.:
1. Page 4 - Expand comments to support element of self sufficiency of the pro-
posed reta i 1 center. (Pa ragraph 3)
2. Pages 7 & 32 - Discuss potential for safety hazards on frontage road at
Oyster Point Boulevard.
3. Pages 9 & 32 - Support basis of claim that access road will provide adequate
access for emergency police and fire vehicles.
4. Page 12 - Discuss further the effects on the specific development of this
site considering the facts as stated pertaining to soil stability.
5. Page 14 - Elaborate on techniques of dealing with methane gas problems.
6. Pages 12 & 13 - Add information on frequency and magnitude of past earth-
quakes as discussed.
7. Page 17 - Discuss further the effect on land surrounding buildings in event
of earthquake.
8. Pages 19 & 20 - Give further, easily understood, explanation of a "design
level geologic investigation" as related to the project site.
9. Page 21 - Give data pertaining to ground water on project site. May require
further investigation.
10. Page 23 - Discuss runoff based on the nature and extent of the use of pre-
vious materials on walkways.
11. Page 24 - Discuss effect on methane gas problems of sealing technique as
described.
_/1("\01_
March 13, 1979
12. Page 32 - Specify where extra parking will be located. Discuss effects of
substandard parking situation.
13. Page 38 - Discuss adequacy of water that is available.asdescribed,"apprQxi-
mately 1500 feet to southll.
14. Page 39 - Discuss whether bussing for schools is to be required and the
effects of same on system.
15. Page 41 - Give further justification of demand for school services based
on adult lifestyle claim.
16. Page 40 - Justify inconsistency of response time of fire department.
17. Page 41 - Provide further detail on "additional demand on other community
services".
18. Pages 42-46 - Provide detailed clarification of cummulative impacts on
surrounding project area, including City of Brisbane.
19. Page 45 - Provide justification for not needing a General Plan designation
amendment.
20. Pages 61-62 - Provide support conclusions of claims stated under heading
Impacts pertaining to noise.
21. Page 64 - Provide additional discussion of higher noise levels and approxi-
mate mitigation measures of same.
22. Page 69 - Discuss impacts on safety of future U.S. Steel operati'ons and/or
expansions.
23. Discuss cummulative effects further.
24.
Discuss alternative further such as: A.
B.
C.
All commercial site
All recommended use
All industrial use
25. Discuss further - major concerns: A. Traffic safety
B. Parking adequacy
C. Safety of methane gas
D. Cummulative effects on Brisbane
E. Alternative A-C above
Commissioner Martin requested that the D.E.I.R. provide further explanation of
impacts on the project if the P.G.& E. time line may be as much as one year
before connection to the project.
Commissioner Grimes questioned the impacts of 101 cloverleaf to serve Brisbane
portion of Sierra Point and how it will relate to access to the South San Fran-
cisco portion. He also requested that the D.E.I.R. include better quality de-
tailed maps of site and access routes as discussed above.
-4092-
March 13, 1979
Commissioner Getz asked staff to identify public trust lands and status of land
ownership in this area.
Commissioner Getz further questioned if the City would have any legal obliga-
tions to the land ownership.
Staff concurred that this could present a problem and that it would have to be
clarified.
Commissioner Getz moved that DEIR-79-6 (UP-79-475) be continued for 30 days.
Commissioner Hoyer seconded the motion and the Commission concurred to continue
the public hearing open for 30 days to allow additional time to collect public
comments. This hearing was scheduled for the Planning Commission Meeting of
April 10, 1979.
UP-79-478
and
Negative Declaration No. 204
An application by Public Storage, Inc. for a Use Permit to construct six one
story mini-warehouse buildings at #1 Oyster Point Boulevard in the M-2 Heavy
Industrial Zone District.
Staff presented the staff report.
Mr. Don Hoffman, Representative, Public Storage
11828 Dublin Boulevard
Dublin, CA 94566
Mr. Hoffman indicated that the staff's redesign is impossible due to petroleum
line easements in the exact area. Mr. Hoffman went on to say that the previous-
ly approved meta 1 bui 1 di ngs were unacceptab 1 e to hi s company.
Mr. Hoffman suggested that the orange color be toned down to the burnt orange
color presented tonight. He further showed the Commission the revised eleva-
tions based on previous Design Review Board recommendations.
Mr. Hoffman expressed objection to any modifications to the approved site plan
stated in the special conditions.
Mr. Jerry Rogers, Sierra Point Development Co.
Mr. Rogers indicated concern pertaining to the access route to Sierra Point
being obstructed because of this development. Mr. Rogers went on to protest,
based on inconsistencies in directive from staff as well as the Planning Com-
mission on the Sierra Point project with regard to access in the area of this
mini-storage warehouse.
Discussion followed as to the ownership of the property involved, direction to
staff regarding the access road and the conditions requiring the dedication of
right-of-way.
-4093-
March 13, 1979
Commissioner Getz expressed concern pertaining to the cummulative effects on
the surrounding areas of the project as designed.
The Commission questioned Special Condition No. 1 with regard to varying the
length of the building. Staff and the applicant concurred to delete Special
Condition No.1.
Further discussiun followed pertaining to the installation of the landscaping
during construction. Staff indicated that a cash deposit was on file to guaran-
tee the installation as approved.
Commissioner Getz recommended Additional Special Condition No.4 be deleted
and amended to read as follows:
4. That additional improvements to include an electric gate, a
surveillance camera and a fence shake alert alarm device shall
be installed prior to occupancy.
Commissioner Getz recommended that Special Condition No. 3 be amended to read
as follows:
3. Heavy landscaping shall be installed throughout both phases during
construction and prior to occupancy subject to review and approval
of a landscape and irrigation plan by the Design Review Board.
Specific attention shall be given to the provision of sufficient
numbers of 24 inch box specimen and 15 gallon trees along the en-
tire length of the 6 foot wide planting strip located along the
westerly property line to provide a landscaped buffer and ade-
quately screen this excessively long development to the satisfaction
of the Design Review Board.
Commissioner Getz further requested that Special Condition No.1, rather than
being deleted, be amended to read as follows:
1. That the landscaping between buildings shall be increased subject
to final Design Review Board approval.
Commissioner Getz reiterated his concern regarding the dual access road proba-
bility along Highway 101.
Commissioner Getz moved that UP-79-478 and Negative Declaration No. 204 be
approved subject to all recommendations and amendments. Commissioner Grimes
seconded the motion and it was approved by a unanimous roll call vote.
UP-79-480
and
Categorical Exemption
An application by Fausto & Rebecca Sunga for a Use Permit to construct a room
addition between the existing single-family house and garage on developed pro-
perty located at 2573 Olmstead Court in the PC-Planned Community Zone District.
-4094-
March 13, 1979
Staff presented the staff report and indicated that the Building Division re-
quired complete working drawings for plan checking.
Vice-Chairman Mantegani moved that UP-79-480 and Categorical Exemption be con-
tinued off-calendar.
The Commission concurred to withhold any action on this matter until such time
as the Building Division has filed a complete report on the method of construc-
tion.
UP-79-481
and
Negative Declaration No. 205
An application by Public Storage, Inc. for a Use Permit to construct a commer-
cial office/mini-warehouse complex on vacant property located on the west side
of South Spruce Avenue approximately 300 feet south of Mayfair Avenue in the
PCM Zone District.
Vice-Chairman Mantegani moved that UP-79-481 and Negative Declaration No. 205
be continued to the regular Planning Commission meeting of March 27, 1979.
Commissioner Getz seconded the motion.
V-79-218
and
Negative Declaration No. 206
An application by Panko/Sinclair Associates for a Variance to permit a 71-0"
encroachment into the required 101-0" exterior side yard setback on vacant
propoerti es 1 oca ted on the northwes t corner of II B II Street and 2nd Street, in
the R-2 Zone District.
Staff and the applicant agreed to continue this item to enable the applicant
to rework the site plan and design.
The Commission concurred to continue this item to the regular Planning Com-
mission meeting of March 27, 1979.
Negative Declaration No. 203
An Environmental Determination based on an application of Richard Diodati to
construct an approximate 1,250 feet public shoreline access pathway and re-
lated improvements along the San Francisco Bay south of Michele Court and
Haskins Way in the M-2 Zone District.
The applicant had no comments.
Vtce-Chairman Mantegani moved that Negative Declaration No. 203 be certified
as complete and in accordance with adopted California Environmental Quality
_lInoe::
March 13, 1979
Act (C.E.Q.A.) Guidelines and directe/d staff to file a Notice of Determination.
Commissioner Getz seconded the motion and it was passed by a unanimous roll
call vote.
Street Name Change
A proposal by the City of South San Francisco for the renaming of School Street
between Maple Avenue and Hillside Boulevard to Spruce Avenue in accordance with
adopted Street Naming Criteria of the City of South San Francisco.
Resolution No. 2247 entitled: "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RENAME SCHOOL STREET,
LOCATED BETWEEN HILLSIDE BOULEVARD AND MAPLE AVENUE TO SPRUCE AVENUE" was
introduced.
Mrs. Paoli requested the reason for the name change.
Staff indicated that the City had been petitioned by the adjacent property owners.
Staff further indicated no improvements to the street are contemplated.
Commissioner Martin moved that the Street Name Change be approved as proposed
and Resolution No. 2247 be adopted and forwarded to the City Council. Commissioner
Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed by a unanimous roll call vote.
REPORTS
Proposed Capital Improvement
1978 - 1979
The report was not presented by the Commission's request because of the late hour.
The Commission agreed that this item be heard at the regulqr Planning Commission
Meeting of March 27, 1979.
COMMUNICATIONS
Resolutions Nos. 2248, 2249, and 2250 were introduced entitled: RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO - COMMENDATION TO
WESLEY SLADE (No. 2248), EUGENE MULLIN (No. 2249), JOSEPH MATHEWSON (No. 2250).
The Resolutions of the three past Commissioners were adopted and all Commissioners
present signed the Resolutions which are to be presented at a later date to the
past Commissioners.
-4096-
GOOD AND WELFARE
March 13, 1979
There being nothing todj~cuss under Good and Wel of matters of interest for
the Commission, Chairman Campredon announced that next regular meeting of
the Planning Commission would be held on March 27, 1979, at 7:30 p.m. in the
West Orange Library Auditorium.
The meeting was aqJourned at 11 :45 p.m.
n 1_
/i
f'
~illiam Cos1anz~,
Planning Commission
City of South San Francisco
NOTE:
Marcel Campredon, Chairman
Planning Commission
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Planning Commission meeting cated the action taken to
dispose of each item. Oral presentations, a and documents are recorded
on tape. The tapes are available in the office of the City Planner and are
available for public discussion.
-4097-