Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.05.95 Minutes MINUTES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION October 5, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lucchesi, Commissioners Masuda, Barnett, Romero, and Padreddii MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice-Chainnan Warren and COlnmissioner DeZordo ALSO PRESENT: Planning Division: Steve Solomon Susy Kalkin Larry Kasparowitz Larrisa Seto Jim Fitzpatrick Richard Harmon Mike Dickson Assist. City Attorney: Fire Departlnent: Engineering Division: Police DepartInent: CHAIRMAN COMMENTS APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 1 and 15, 1995. Motion-Padreddii/Second-Masuda: To approve the June 1, 1995 Ininutes as presented. Commissioner ROlnero noted correction on Line 1 of Paragraph 7, Page 2; on the Alioto case he did not participate and was not unanimous. UnaniInously approved by voice vote as corrected. Motion-Bamett/Second-Rolnero: To approved the June 15, 1995 Ininutes as presented. They were unanimously approved by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARING - AGENDA ITEMS 218 Ryan Way, Dr. John's Towing (Scopesi,owner), UP-95-999 Use Permit to allow storage of operable vehicles with 24 hr. operations within an existing multi- tenant industrial building in the M-l Light Industrial District, in accordance with SSFMC Sections 20.30.030 and 20.30.040. Chairman Lucchesi opened the public hearing. Senior Planner Kalkin presented the staff report. Applicant: John Arana 405 King Drive, SSF Mr. Arana described the business and use of property. Most of the improvements to the property have been done; the lighting, ventilation and drainage are left. In response to Commissioner Masuda's question, Mr. Arana stated there would be no vehicle repairs done on site. Commissioner ROInero asked where the tow truck would be stored. Mr. Arana answered they would be in the building or at his home since they provide a 24-hr towing service. Property Owner Representative: Ray Lagomarsino 1777 Borel Circle San Mateo Mr. Lagolnarsino explained that this property has been vacant for several years, and due to problems with zoning use, the rental value has decreased. He noted a concern with Building Division's Condition C.7 requiring the applicant to penetrate the concrete floors at two locations to put in buckets to collect oil. He felt this would create a toxic waste problem and asked that the condition be deleted or modified. Discussion continued on the alternatives. He suggested placing oil collecting pans under each car with absorbent material that would be replaced regularly as needed. Chairman Lucchesi closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Padreddii agreed with the idea of drip trays under each car. Chief Planner advised that this is a requirement of the Plumbing Code. The Commission could delete the condition but the Plumbing Code would still need to be met per Building Division Penn it process. Discussion continued and Condition No. C.7 was amended as follows: C. 7. In areas where motor vehicles are stored floor surfaces shall be of noncombustible, nonabsorbent materials. Floors shall drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers in accordance with the Plumbing Code. At the discretion of the Chief Building Official an alternate means of drainage construction may be approved provided it is not in conflict with the Plumbing Code. Applicant agreed to use rice hull material to clean floors. Motion-Padreddii/Second-Masuda: To approved UP-95-999 based on the findings contained in the staff report and the aInended Conditions of Approval. It was unanimously approved by voice vote. 753 Del Monte Avenue, Citizens Concerned for Balanced Education (CCBE), Applicant (South San Francisco Unified School District, Owner); UP-95-998 Use Permit to allow Bingo as a cOlnlnercial recreation use in a portion of the fonner EI Rancho School in accordance with SSFMC Section 20.16.030. Page 2 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 Senior Planner Kalkin presented the staff report. Applicant: Shirley Hoch infonned the Commission that she is no longer Shirley Hoch & with the organization of CCBE and introduced her replacement. Sidney Greenberg CCBE 753 Del Monte Ave. South San Francisco, Ms. Greenberg cOlnmented that the Bingo attendants are mostly seniors, adults and young couples with school age families, and made herself available for questions. Commissioner Masuda asked if they advertised in the newspaper. The applicant responded in the affirmative. Speakin~ in favor: Angel McNaughton Susan McNaughton, parent 149 Lacrosse Ave., SSF Jo Anne Miguel, parent 2552 Olmstead Ct., SSF Carol Campbell, parent 216 Clifden Drive, SSF Anna Lashoo, parent 232 Longford Drive, SSF Speakin~ with concern: Claire D' Amico 136 San Felipe Ave., SSF Speaking with concern: Jake Jones 12 El Campo Drive, SSF Ms. McNaughton spoke of her participation in the school band and was concerned that without the Bingo there would be no Inusic program. A number of parents spoke in favor of the CCBE Bingo program and the wonderful music progralns which it supports. They cOlnlnented that a sInoke free environment was provided, as well as a free lunch. Additionally, they mentioned that relatives from other cities came to play to support the music program. Ms. D' Alnico felt most of the neighbors were not aware of this Ineeting. She had no problem with people coming from out of town, but was concerned that she was not noticed when the Bingo use started. Mr. Jones stated his support for any program that helps kids. However, he questioned the non-profit status of this organization and wanted to make sure the schools received the money from this operation. He suggested that the hearing be continued until all of the neighborhood had been notified. Chairman Lucchesi explained that the Planning COITIlTIission is a land use body and did not involve itself in reviewing the financial aspects of this or any other project. While questions regarding the financial aspects of the operation were legitimate concerns, they should instead be referred to the School Board or the CCBE governing body. Speaking with concern: Marie Woodland 251 Longford Drive, SSF Ms. Woodland noted that she had also served on the School District's Lease COInInittee and felt this Bingo use should have been noticed before it started. Page 3 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 Speakin~ with concern: Barbara Schonig 786 Alta Lorna Drive, SSF Ms. Schonig reiterated the concerns about noticing and about the amount of money the schools were receiving from the bingo operation. The applicant, Ms. Greenberg, informed the Commission that notices had been hand-carried to the surrounding neighborhoods when the use first started. Speakin~ in favor: Andrew Town 3D-year Resident of SSF Mr. Town stated that he is a volunteer for the Bingo program and feels that this is a good activity for the seniors. There are no traffic or parking problems. Speakin~ in favor: Anna Lashoo 232 Longford Drive, SSF Ms. Lashoo asked if the Commission deferred making a decision, would the Bingo be allowed to continue its operation? She was very concerned that if the bingo operations were forced to cease while these arguInents were being settled that the band program would be jeopardized. Chairman Lucchesi closed the public hearing. Chief Planner Solomon advised the COInInission that in cases where a use is operating without a permit, established practice has been that it be allowed to continue as long as there is constant contact with the City and efforts are being Inade to correct the situation. Commissioner Padreddii asked about the extent of neighborhood notification? Planning staff replied that notices had been sent to all property owners within a 300' foot radius of the site, as required by State law, a total of 150 notices; additionally, a notice was posted in the San Mateo Times. Commissioner Romero said he saw no justification to deny or continue this item; he noted there were no complaints froln Police Department regarding traffic or parking impacts, and none of the speakers were objecting to the use at the site. He felt the use was serving the community and that the State noticing requirements had been Inet. Commissioner Padreddii said he was concerned with parking since it is an advertised bingo game and people froIn outside the cOlnInunity also attend. He questioned the capacity of the facility. Senior Planner Kalkin informed the COInlnission that the Fire Departlnent liInits this room's maximum occupancy at 213 for dining and 457 for asseInbly. Shirley Hoch noted that the average attendance was 70 to 90 people and that the dining occupancy lilnits Inore closely reflects the capacity since all participants are seated at tables. Chief Planner Solomon asked if the applicant had any objection to a maximum limit of 150 participants. Ms. Greenberg agreed to the limitation. Chairman Lucchesi commented that conditions of approval would require all patrons to park on site, and would limit patronage to a maxiInuIn of 150 participants. Given the large expanse of on-site Page 4 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 parking there would be plenty of parking. Senior Planner Kalkin recommended adding a condition limiting the hours of operations to: Tuesdays, 5 pm - 10 pm; and Fridays, 11 am - 4 pIn. A discussion continued on whether or not enough people were notified. Chairman Lucchesi asked the Commission if they wished to expand the notification area froIn 300', but he felt that meeting State requirements was sufficient. ComInissioner Masuda said he still felt that 300' radius was not enough. Chairman Lucchesi reopened the public hearing and further heard COlnments on extending the notification radius. Commissioner Padreddii was concerned with the fact that notices only go to property owners; renters living next door to projects do not get noticed. The Commission agreed that the speakers were not against the use, but were concerned with the notification process; all approved the benefit to the school. Claire D' Amico and Barbara Schonig stated their concern about this operation and wanted it to be noticed more than 300 feet. They wanted all neighbors to be notified, but were not asking the Commission to deny the use. Assistant City Attorney Seto addressing those people with concern, informed that State Law only requires notification of property owners within 300' of the proposed project and the City had fulfilled the requirements in this instance. When City staff perceives there will be more citizen concern on a project they can expand the notification area. In this case, the City placed an advertisement in the local paper. Also, if a citizen wishes to receive an agenda helshe may request to be placed on a mailing list. To address the speakers who are concerned that the Planning Commission had not followed proper procedures, she noted that the City had exceeded all the statutory requirements. Representing Property Owner: Janice Smith, Staff South San Francisco Unified School District (SSFUSD) Ms. Slnith stated that she has managed property for SSFUSD since 1990 and that there is an Advisory COInmittee of the School Board of Trustees which handles its leased property. The school district held two public hearings relating to the use of this site. Written notices were sent to parents via the students, also placed in the newspaper and on Cable TV. Current lease agreements require that uses on school property go through proper permits with the City. The Advisory Committee does not Ineet on a regular basis, it's called on by the Board periodically when it is needed. Chairman Lucchesi again closed the public hearing. He asked if the COlnlnission wished to expand the review period to 6 months and then again in a year? Page 5 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 Motion-Romero/Second-Bamett: To approved UP-95-998 based on the attached findings and revised conditions of approval to include a review period in 6 Inonths and again in a year, limits in the number of patrons and limits on the hours of operations. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Chainnan Lucchesi, Commissioners Romero and Barnett. NOES: Masuda and Padreddii. ABSENT: Vice-Chair Warren and Commissioner DeZordo 176-180 Gateway Boulevard, Olympian Oil Company (Applicant & Owner), UP-95-997, Negative Declaration No. 799 Use Permit to allow a 24-hr. truck fueling station with scales, washing and parking facilities, and an automobile gasoline station including a convenience store with drive-up fast food service in accordance with provisions of SSFMC Sections 20.24.030(c), 20.24.060, 20.24.070(a), 20.32.030(c), 20.32.060, & 20.32.070(a). Interim Planner Kasparowitz presented the staff report and added the following Conditions of Approval from the Planning Division: 13. No alcoholic sales shall be pemzitted. 14. All the Police Department's conditions set forth are conditions of this permit and the permittee shall comply with said conditions. 15. The project shall not be phased without nzodification to this Use Permit. Chairman Lucchesi opened the public hearing. Representative of Owner I Applicant: Chris Lucia, Robert H. Lee & Assoc. 1137 N. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 Rich Firenzi, Vice-Pres. of Operations Olympian Oil Company 260 Michele Court So. San Francisco, CA 94080 Chairman Lucchesi closed the public hearing. Mr. Lucia agreed with staff's recommendation except for Engineering Division's condition B.l.a. He discussed the widening of the driveway and access route within the site for refueling. Mr. Firenzi was concerned with Planning Division's condition A.7 and noted a 10 foot strip of landscaping had been discussed at the Design Review Board but Inore landscaping was added. He felt that they had Inet the required landscaping. Mr. Firenzi also said he disagreed with the calculations for the Oyster Point Overpass Contribution. He noted that they would not be generating new traffic. Chief Planner Solomon responded to their concerns: 1) the Oyster Pt. Overpass Contribution is for all those who benefit from the overpass; 2) Staff agreed with the Police Department's condition that Page 6 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 the sale of beer and wine should not be at a truck refueling facility and Officer Dickson was present to answer any further questions; 3) The existing landscaping in the adjoining area is extensive, and a request for a 20 foot landscaping strip at the entrance along Gateway to screen the site is appropriate; and 4) Mr. Harmon of Engineering was present for questions on on-site circulation. Officer Dickson agreed that the sale of alcohol on this site is inappropriate. He noted that a truck driver's alcohol level is much lower to be considered driving-under-the-influence. He also agreed with the Planning Division's condition of not having a piece meal application since this would show traffic circulation. Sr. Engineering Technician Hannon discussed his concerns of the on-site circulation. Reducing the landscape strip along Gateway Blvd. at the pumps to increase maneuvering space was agreed upon by Engineering and Planning Divisions. The Commission, applicant and staff discussed the vehicle circulation patterns for pumping diesel and gasoline fuel and the use of the mini-Inart. Discussion continued on the pros and cons of the parallel pumps, or pUInps at a 900 or 450 angle. The applicant suggested the pumps be at a 150 angle and noted they will have signage for the entrance and exit at the driveways. After meeting with the Police and Engineering Departments they have eliIninated a driveway to control traffic from Gateway Blvd. The Comlnission agreed, due to the site configuration, to keep the pumps as requested by the applicant. Discussion continued regarding off-site circulation. The applicant noted that Parcel 2 would only be used for parking, as requested by PG&E. The applicant clarified that Parcel 2 and 3 would be done at the same time. Staff clarified that if the applicant wished to only build Parcel 2 or 3, he would have to come back to the Commission for approval. Commissioner Masuda asked if a ten foot width of landscaping is satisfactory? Chairman Lucchesi noted that 20 foot wide landscaping should be the IniniInuIn and it should include shrubs and large trees to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Chief Planner Solomon advised 10' would not be satisfactory, and suggested that the landscape match the existing area and to screen 14 foot trucks. The Commission agreed. Chief Planner asked about the Commission's recomInendation on the sales of alcohol. The Commission concurred with the condition of no sales of alcohol. Commissioner Romero was concerned that the area would become overwhelmingly populated with trucks and asked if traffic studies for the previous gas station project nearby took into consideration the traffic effects of this project? Staff said, "No". COInmissioner Padreddii saw that having two fueling stations would alleviate truck traffic in this area. Chief Planner speculated that the truck traffic would split between the two stations. A discussion continued on the concerns of RV's parking at the rear of the lot. Chairman Lucchesi was concerned with the drive-thru traffic crossing a pedestrian crosswalk. Mr. Page 7 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195 Lucia advised that a shnilar situation has signage and Inarkings for customers or a berm to warn vehicle traffic and pedestrians. Commissioner Masuda suggested a bell or red light with weight sensitive triggers for vehicles at crosswalk. A discussion continued on the illuminated fascia canopy and the car-wash. The Commission directed that the following Planning Division's conditions be added: 13. No alcoholic sales shall be permitted. 14. All the Police Department's conditions setforth are conditions of this permit and the permittee shall comply with said conditions. 15. The project shall not be phased without modification to this Use Permit. 16. The conflict between the drive-thru aisle and the pedestrian sidewalk at the parking area shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Chief Planner. 17. The design and material of the awning over the convenience store entry shall be included in the sign program to be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Motion-Padreddii/Second-Masuda: Motion to approve UP-95-997 and Negative Declaration No. 799 based on the findings contained in the staff report and revised conditions of approval. Motion approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Chainnan Lucchesi, Vice-Chair Warren and Commissioners Romero, Barnett, Masuda and Padreddii. ABSENT: Vice-Chair Warren and Commissioner DeZordo. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Items from Staff: Chief Planner SoloInon reported that the Julao PUD was appealed to City Council and scheduled for 10/25195. The BART Design RFP's were received, three firms were interviewed and staff would be recommending Group 4' s proposal. The Patel Motel would be going back to Council with a new design. Lastly, Bay Area Diablo wants a new design, they now want the standard Shell design does the ComInission want this iteln back for their review? Commissioner Padreddii and Chairman Lucchesi agreed if it's different to COIne back for review. Commission will review. Also, Chief Planner Solomon reported on the status of Terrabay Phase I, purchase by Centex Homes. Richard Hannon Engineering Technician, reported on the status of the Terrabay Pump station. Items from Commission: Commissioner Masuda reported on the Genentech subcommittee's meeting regarding the Genentech Central Spine. Richard Hannon, Engineering Technician, reported on the pedestrian crosswalk of the Central Spine project and vacation of Kauffman Court, which will be coming before the COlnlnission soon. Page 8 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015/95 Items from the Public: None Adjournment: Motion-Lucchesi/Second-Masuda: To adjourn the meeting at 11:30 P.M. to October 19, 1995. It was unanimously approved by voice vote. ~ hkAtjjM)- Steve Solomon, Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Francisco JL:SS:rp Page 9 of 9 Pages PC Meeting of 1015195