HomeMy WebLinkAbout0014_2_Exhibit A-1 - Associated MMRP840 El Camino Real Hotel Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
prepared by
City of South San Francisco
Planning Division, Economic and Community Development Department
315 Maple Avenue
South San Francisco, California 94080
in consultation with
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
449 15th Street, Suite 303
Oakland, California 94612
April 2020
Exhibit A-1 - Associated MMRP
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 5-1
5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the 840 El Camino
Real Hotel Project (proposed project) in the City of South San Francisco. The California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting
program for assessing and ensuring compliance with any required mitigation measures applied to
proposed development. As stated in section 21081.6(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code:
...the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to
the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid
significant effects on the environment.
Section 21081.6 also provides general guidelines for implementing mitigation monitoring programs
and indicates that specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements, to be enforced during project
implementation, shall be defined as part of adopting a mitigated negative declaration.
The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the required mitigation measures identified in the Initial
Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) are implemented as part of the overall project
implementation. In addition, the MMRP provides feedback to agency staff and decision-makers
during project implementation and identifies the need for enforcement action before irreversible
environmental damage occurs.
The following table summarizes the mitigation measures for each issue area identified in the IS-
MND for the proposed project. The table identifies the actions required for the measure to be
implemented, the time at which the mitigation is to be implemented, the monitoring frequency, and
the agency or party responsible for ensuring that the monitoring is performed. In addition, the table
includes columns for compliance verification. These columns will be filled out by the monitoring
agency or party and would document monitoring compliance. Where an impact was identified to be
less than significant, no mitigation measures were required.
City of South San Francisco
840 El Camino Real Hotel Project
5-2
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Air Quality
AQ-1 Fugitive Dust Control Measures
Consistent with the BAAQMD (2017) CEQA Air Quality
Guidelines, the project shall implement the following BMPs
during all phases of project construction to reduce fugitive
dust emissions:
All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas,
soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads)
shall be watered two times per day.
All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose
material off-site shall be covered.
All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public
roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. Dry power sweeping is
prohibited.
All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to
15 miles per hour.
All roadway, driveway, and sidewalk paving shall be
completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be
laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or
soil binders are used.
Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting
equipment off when not in use or reducing the
maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by
the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13,
Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]).
Clear signage indicating these rules shall be provided
for construction workers at all access points.
All construction equipment shall be maintained and
properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s
specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a
certified mechanic and determined to be running in
proper conditions prior to operation.
Incorporation of
fugitive dust
control measures
in grading and
construction
plans.
Review of plans
prior to
issuance of
construction
permits
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 5-3
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
A publicly visible sign shall be posted with the
telephone number and person to contact at the lead
agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall
respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.
The BAAQMD phone number shall also be visible to
ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
Biological Resources
BIO-1 Conducting Nesting Bird Preconstruction Surveys
Ground disturbance and vegetation removal activities
should be restricted to the non-breeding season (September
16 to January 31) for all segments when feasible. For ground
disturbance and vegetation removal activities occurring in
all project areas during the bird nesting season (February 1
to September 15), general pre-construction nesting bird
surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist for all
migratory birds, including special status birds and raptors,
not more than 14 days prior to construction activities
involving ground clearing, vegetation removal/trimming, or
building demolition. The surveys should include the
disturbance area plus a 200-foot buffer around the site if
feasible. If active nests are located, an appropriate
avoidance buffer should be established within which no
work activity will be allowed which would impact these
nests. The avoidance buffer would be established by the
qualified biologist on a case-by-case basis based on the
species and site conditions. In no cases should the buffer be
smaller than 50 feet for non-raptor bird species or 300 feet
for raptor species. Larger buffers may be required
depending upon the status of the nest and the construction
activities occurring in the vicinity of the nest. The buffer
area(s) should be closed to all construction personnel and
equipment until juveniles have fledged and the nest is
inactive. The implementing entity-approved biologist should
confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and young have
fledged the nest prior to removal of the buffer.
Verify that
construction is
scheduled outside
of the bird
breeding season
to the extent
feasible; if
construction is to
occur during the
bird breeding
season, verify and
review completion
of a nesting bird
survey and review
survey results; if
nests are found,
verify compliance
with established
buffer
Review
construction
scheduling prior
to issuance of
construction
permits; field
monitoring as
necessary
during
construction.
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
City of South San Francisco
840 El Camino Real Hotel Project
5-4
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
Cultural Resources
CR-1 Archaeological and Native American Monitoring
A qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior
Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (36 CFR
61) shall monitor all ground disturbing activities. The
qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the City of
South San Francisco, may recommend the reduction or
termination of monitoring depending upon observed
conditions (e.g., no resources encountered within the first
50 percent of ground disturbance). If archaeological
resources are encountered during ground-disturbing
activities, work within a 100-foot radius of the find must halt
and the find evaluated for CRHR eligibility. Should an
unanticipated resource be found as CRHR eligible and
avoidance is infeasible, such as preservation in place or
archaeological data recovery, shall occur as required by the
archeologist in coordination with City staff and descendants
and/or stakeholder groups, as warranted. Once the resource
has been properly treated or protected, work in the area
may resume. A Native American representative shall be
retained to monitor mitigation work associated with Native
American cultural material.
If cultural
resources
encountered on-
site during
ground-disturbing
activities, verify
that construction
activities are
halted and that
the find is
evaluated by a
qualified
archaeologist and
Native American
representative
contacted
Field monitoring
during
construction as
necessary
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
Geology and Soils
GEO-1 Adherence to Geotechnical Investigation
Recommendations
A Geotechnical Investigation dated October 19, 2016 was
prepared for the project site by Michelucci & Associates, Inc.
Final building plans shall be submitted for review to the
author of the Geotechnical Investigation or to a similarly
qualified engineer approved by the City. The purpose of the
review shall be to verify that the recommendations of the
Geotechnical Investigation are understood and reflected on
the plans and to allow for supplemental recommendations.
The engineer shall be retained to provide observation and
testing services during construction. Observations and tests
Review of grading
and construction
plans by qualified
engineer;
implementation of
supplemental on-
site
recommendations
as necessary
Review of plans
prior to
issuance of
construction
permits
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 5-5
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
will allow for verification that materials encountered are
consistent with those found during soil testing and will allow
for supplemental on-site recommendations, as needed.
GEO-2 Unanticipated Discovery of Paleontological
Resources
Prior to the commencement of project construction, a
Qualified Paleontologist shall be retained to conduct
paleontological monitoring during ground-disturbing
activities (including, but not limited to site preparation,
grading, excavation, and trenching) of previously
undisturbed geologic units determined to have a high
paleontological sensitivity. The Qualified Paleontologist shall
have at least a Master’s degree or equivalent work
experience in paleontology, shall have knowledge of the
local paleontology, and shall be familiar with paleontological
procedures and techniques.
Full-time monitoring shall be conducted for any excavations
exceeding seven feet below ground surface within
undisturbed areas underlain by the Colma Formation.
Monitoring shall be supervised by the Qualified
Paleontologist and shall be conducted by a qualified
paleontological monitor, defined as an individual who meets
the minimum qualifications per standards set forth by the
SVP (2010), which includes a B.S. or B.A. degree in geology
or paleontology with one year of monitoring experience and
knowledge of collection and salvage of paleontological
resources.
The duration and timing of the monitoring shall be
determined by the Qualified Paleontologist. If the Qualified
Paleontologist determines that full-time monitoring is no
longer warranted, he or she may recommend reducing
monitoring to periodic spot-checking or may recommend
that monitoring cease entirely. Monitoring shall be
reinstated if any new ground disturbances of previously
Qualified
paleontologist
conducts
monitoring during
ground-disturbing
activities; if
paleontological
resources are
discovered on-site
during
construction, halt
construction
activities and
ensure that the
find is evaluated
by a qualified
paleontologist
Field monitoring
during
construction as
necessary
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
City of South San Francisco
840 El Camino Real Hotel Project
5-6
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
undisturbed areas are required, and reduction or
suspension shall be reconsidered by the Qualified
Paleontologist at that time.
If a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall
have the authority to temporarily divert construction
equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific
significance and collected. Once salvaged, significant fossils
shall be prepared to a curation-ready condition and curated
in a scientific institution with a permanent paleontological
collection (such as the UCMP). Curation fees are the
responsibility of the project owner.
A final report shall be prepared describing the results of the
paleontological monitoring efforts associated with the
project. The report shall include a summary of the field and
laboratory methods, an overview of the project geology and
paleontology, a list of taxa recovered (if any), an analysis of
fossils recovered (if any) and their scientific significance, and
recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the City.
If the monitoring efforts produced fossils, then a copy of the
report shall also be submitted to the designated museum
repository.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG-1 GHG Emissions Reduction Measures
To achieve consistency with the City’s CAP, the project shall
implement the following GHG emissions reduction
measures:
The proposed project shall be constructed in
accordance with CALGreen Tier 1 voluntary measures
for nonresidential development.
The proposed project shall comply with one of the
following standards:
Meet a minimum of 50 percent of modeled
building electricity needs with on-site renewable
Implementation of
emissions
reduction
measures in
project plans
Prior to
issuance of
construction
permits
Applicant City of South
San Francisco
Planning
Department
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 5-7
Mitigation Measure Action Required
Mitigation
Timing
Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Agency or
Party
Compliance Verification
Initial Date Comments
energy sources. To calculate 50 percent of building
electricity needs for the new conditioned space,
the applicant shall calculate building electricity use
as part of the Title 24 compliance process. Total
electricity use shall include total use for the new
conditioned space excluding process energy,
Participate in a power purchase agreement to
offset a minimum of 50 percent of modeled
building electricity use. Building electricity use
shall be calculated using the method identified
above.
Comply with CALGreen Tier 2 energy efficiency
requirements to exceed mandatory energy
efficiency requirements by 20 percent or more.
The proposed project shall include a landscaping
palette consisting of drought-tolerant and/or low
water-use species.
The project shall use captured rainwater or graywater
for landscaping irrigation.