Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0014_6_Exhibit B-2 - Rincon Response to Comment 2Rincon Consultants, Inc. 449 15th Street, Suite 303 Oakland, California 94612 510 834 4455 OFFICE info@rinconconsultants.com www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers June 30, 2020  Project No: 19‐07973  Biney js Sagoo, Founding Partner  B Design Studio  855 Sansome Street, Suite 200  San Francisco, California 94111  Subject:  Response to Selected Comments on the IS‐MND Prepared for the 840 El Camino Real Hotel  Project, South San Francisco, California  Dear Mr. Sagoo:  Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) has prepared a response to the comment letter dated May 14, 2020  submitted by Lozeau Drury LLP on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS‐MND) for the 840  El Camino Real Hotel project (herein referred to as “proposed project” or “project”), which incorporates  an air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis prepared by Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprises  (SWAPE). The responses prepared by Rincon focus on sections C through G of the comment letter, which  pertain to the air quality and GHG analysis of the IS‐MND  Response to Comments Each of the following responses is lettered to match the format of the comment letter. Each separate  issue raised by the commenter under the letter, if more than one, has been assigned a number. The  responses to each comment identify first the letter of the section, and then the number assigned to  each issue (Response D.1, for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in section  D of the letter). See Attachment 1 for the annotated comment letter.  Response C The commenter incorrectly states an opinion that the screening criteria used to evaluate the project’s  operational emissions applies only to operational nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions and suggests that  emissions of other criteria pollutants should be evaluated.  The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)  Air Quality Guidelines (2017) clearly state that projects that fall below the operational criteria pollutant  screening size would generate less‐than‐significant levels of emissions of all criteria air pollutants, not  just the criteria air pollutant listed in parentheses next to the screening size specified for each land use  in Table 3‐1 (BAAQMD 2017). Section 3.1.1 on Page 3‐1 of the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines  states that “If the project meets the screening criteria in Table 3‐1, the project would not result in the  generation of operational‐related criteria air pollutants and/or precursors that would exceed the  Thresholds of Significance shown in Table 2‐2. Operation of the proposed project would therefore result  in a less‐than‐significant cumulative impact to air quality from criteria air pollutant and precursor  emissions.” Furthermore, Section 4.1.1 on Page 4‐1 states that “This preliminary screening provides a  conservative indication of whether operation of the proposed project would result in the generation of  Exhibit B-2 - Rincon Response to Comment No. 2 City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 2   criteria air pollutants and/or precursors that exceed the Thresholds of Significance listed in Chapter 2. If  all of the Screening Criteria are met, the operation of the proposed project would result in a less than  significant impact to air quality. If the proposed project does not meet all the Screening Criteria, then  project emissions need to be quantified” (BAAQMD 2017). Areana Flores, Environmental Planner at the  BAAQMD, confirmed this understanding in an email communication, stating therein that if a project falls  below the screening size, “the operational air quality impact for all criteria pollutants would be  considered less than significant” (Flores 2020; full email correspondence included in Attachment 2).  The criteria air pollutant listed in parentheses next to the screening size specified for each land use  simply indicates the limiting factor, which is the criteria air pollutant by which the BAAQMD determined  emissions for the specified land use would potentially exceed the thresholds of significance shown in  Table 2‐2 of CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (2017). For example, the screening size for hotel projects is 489  rooms because at this size or greater, a project would have the potential to generate operational  emissions that exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance, specifically the threshold for NOX, which  is the limiting factor listed in parentheses next to the hotel land use. However, emissions need not be  quantified for hotel projects with fewer than 489 rooms because emissions of all criteria pollutants  would be below the BAAQMD thresholds of significance. Nevertheless, for the purposes of full  disclosure, Table A and Table B summarize the project’s daily and annual operational emissions,  respectively, in comparison to BAAQMD operational thresholds. As shown therein, project emissions  would not exceed BAAQMD daily or annual operational thresholds; therefore, impacts would be less  than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Draft IS‐MND.  Table A Estimated Daily Operational Emissions  Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)  Emissions Source ROG NOx CO SO2  Exhaust  PM10  Exhaust  PM2.5  Area Sources 3.4 < 0.1 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 < 0.1  Energy Sources 0.1 1.4 1.1 < 0.1 0.1 0.1  Mobile Sources 0.8 3.4 7.7 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1  Total 4.3 4.7 8.9 < 0.1 0.1 0.1  BAAQMD Thresholds 54 54 N/A N/A 82 54  Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A N/A No No  ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide, SO2 = sulfur dioxide; PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns  in diameter or less; PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; lbs/day = pounds per day; BAAQMD = Bay Area Air  Quality Management District  N/A = Not available. The BAAQMD has not established recommended quantitative thresholds for CO and SO2.  Note: All emissions modeling was completed using the California Emissions Estimator Model in accordance with applicant‐provided  information and data. Some numbers may not add up due to rounding. Emissions presented are the highest of the winter and summer  modeled emissions.  See Attachment 3 for CalEEMod worksheets.  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 3   Table B Estimated Annual Operational Emissions  Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year)  Emissions Source ROG NOx CO SO2  Exhaust  PM10  Exhaust  PM2.5  Area Sources 0.6 < 0.1 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 < 0.1  Energy Sources < 0.1 0.2 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1  Mobile Sources 0.1 0.4 0.8 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.1  Total 0.7 0.6 1.0 < 0.1 0.2 0.1  BAAQMD Thresholds 10 10 N/A N/A 15 10  Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A N/A N/A N/A  ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SO2 = sulfur dioxide; PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns  in diameter or less; PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; lbs/day = pounds per day; BAAQMD = Bay Area Air  Quality Management District  N/A = Not available. The BAAQMD has not established recommended quantitative thresholds for CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5.  Note: All emissions modeling was completed using the California Emissions Estimator Model in accordance with applicant‐provided  information and data. Some numbers may not add up due to rounding   See Attachment 3 for CalEEMod worksheets.  Response D.0 The commenter states an opinion that the values input into the California Emissions Estimator Model  (CalEEMod) to estimate the project’s emissions were unsubstantiated or inconsistent with information  in the IS‐MND, which resulted in an underestimate of the project’s emissions. The commenter suggests  that an Environmental Impact Report is required to evaluate project impacts.  As discussed in Responses D.1 through D.6, the values input into CalEEMod to estimate project  emissions are substantiated and consistent with information in the IS‐MND with the exceptions of two  errors in the modeling related to construction worker/vendor trips and the project’s water use. As  discussed in Response D.4, the model erroneously modified the default numbers of construction worker  and vendor trips. In addition, as detailed in Response D.5, the model erroneously includes both a 20  percent reduction in indoor water use and installation of water‐efficient fixtures, which results in double  counting of water use reductions. These errors have been corrected in the modeling, and the results are  included in revised Table 4 from the Draft IS‐MND under Response D.4 and revised Table 9 from the  Draft IS‐MND under Response D.5. As shown therein, project emissions with these errors remedied  remain below the thresholds of significance; therefore, air quality and GHG emissions impacts remain  less than significant. As such, an Environmental Impact Report is not required to evaluate project air  quality and GHG emission impacts, which remain less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of  the Draft IS‐MND.  Response D.1 The commenter states an opinion that there is a lack of evidence to support the energy intensity factors  used in CalEEMod for Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE). In addition, the commenter states that the analysis  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 4   in the IS‐MND underestimates emissions because it does not account for the fact that Pacific Gas and  Electric (PG&E) would provide natural gas service to the project site.  Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, on Page 71 of the Draft IS‐MND, states that “In 2018, PCE’s  ECOplus option (the option with the lowest percentage of renewables) had a portfolio of 51 percent  eligible renewable energy sources with an energy intensity factor of 129.77 pounds of carbon dioxide  equivalents (CO2e) per megawatt‐hour (MWh; PCE 2018; Brown 2019). Per Senate Bill (SB) 100, the  statewide Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program requires electricity providers to increase  procurement from eligible renewable energy sources to 60 percent by 2030. To account for continuing  effects of the RPS, PCE’s energy intensity factor was reduced based on the percentage of renewables  mandated by SB 100 for year 2030. Therefore, by 2030, PCE’s ECOplus option will have an energy  intensity factor of approximately 105.93 pounds per MWh.” As cited on Page 71 of the Draft IS‐MND,  the current energy intensity factor of 129.77 pounds of CO2e per MWh was obtained from personal  email communication with Leslie Brown, Director of Customer Care at PCE, and information on the  utility’s current renewable energy portfolio was obtained from California Energy Commission data  available on PCE’s website. Both sources are included in this response as Attachment 2. To account for  the continuing effects of the RPS, PCE’s current energy intensity factor was adjusted using proportional  relationships via Equation 1 and Equation 2 to calculate the anticipated energy intensity factor for year  2030 at which time PCE is required to achieve 60 percent renewable energy procurement (equivalent to  40 percent nonrenewable energy procurement). Equation 1 was used to calculate the energy intensity  factor for a hypothetical scenario with 0 percent renewable energy procurement (equivalent to 100  percent nonrenewable energy procurement), which would be approximately 264.8 pounds of CO2e per  MWh. This value was then used in Equation 2 to calculate the energy intensity factor for the year 2030  scenario of 60 percent (equivalent to 40 percent nonrenewable energy procurement), which would be  105.93 pounds of CO2e per MWh. This value was then used as the energy intensity factor in CalEEMod to  estimate GHG emissions associated with the project’s electricity use.    Equation 1  129.77 pounds of CO2e per MWh 𝑥 pounds of CO2e per MWh ൌ 49 percent nonrenewables 100 percent nonrenewables    where x ൌ 264.8 pounds of CO2e per MWh Equation 2    𝑦 pounds of CO2e per MWh 264.8 pounds of CO2e per MWh ൌ 40 percent nonrenewables 100 percent nonrenewables    where y ൌ 105.93 pounds of CO2e per MWh   This energy intensity factor is not used to estimate GHG emissions associated with natural gas use. As  stated on Page 17 of the CalEEMod User Guide, “the intensity factors are used in various modules to  calculate the GHG emissions associated with electricity use,” a fact that is affirmed on Page 3 of  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 5   SWAPE’s analysis, which states that “CalEEMod [uses]1 the CO2, CH4, and N2O intensity factors to  calculate the Project’s greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions associated with electricity use” (CAPCOA  2017). As stated in Section 7.4 on pages 38‐39 of the CalEEMod User Guide, GHG emissions from natural  gas usage are calculated using emission factors from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s AP‐42  or the California Climate Action Registry protocol, not on emission factors specific to the utility that will  provide natural gas to the project site. Natural gas emission factors are the same for every utility  provider because the quantity of emissions is associated with the fuel type (natural gas), which is the  same regardless of the utility provider. The project’s natural gas emissions are estimated to be  approximately 270 metric tons (MT) of CO2e per year, as shown in Section 5.2 Energy by Land Use –  Natural Gas of the CalEEMod Annual results for year 2030 included in Appendix AQ of the Draft IS‐MND.  Therefore, the GHG emissions modeling appropriately relies on PCE’s energy intensity factors, which are  supported by substantial evidence provided by PCE (see Attachment 2). No revisions to the calculations  of GHG emissions from project electricity and natural gas consumption are warranted in response to this  comment. Impacts would remain less than significant.  Response D.2 The commenter states an opinion that the IS‐MND does not specify the project construction schedule  and that substantial evidence was not provided to justify the changes made to the default construction  schedule used in CalEEMod.  The project construction schedule utilized in CalEEMod was provided by the project applicant, who  estimated the length of each phase based on the size and nature of the project and prior experience in  the building industry. Table C presents the construction schedule provided by the applicant.   Table C Project Construction Schedule Construction Phase Dates  Demolition 10/1/2020 – 11/1/2020  Site Preparation 11/1/2020 – 12/1/2020  Grading 12/1/2020 – 12/15/2020  Building Construction 12/15/2020 – 4/15/2022  Paving 1/15/2021 – 2/1/2021  Architectural Coating 10/1/2021 – 12/1/2021  Source: Provided by the project applicant.  The phase lengths shown in Table  are more realistic than the default values used in CalEEMod. For  example, the default phase length in CalEEMod for site preparation is one day. As stated in Section 3.1,  Project Description, on Page 7 of the Draft IS‐MND, the proposed project would require excavation and  export of approximately 13,300 cubic yards of soil material, which would occur during the site  preparation phase. It is unrealistic to expect that magnitude of soil material to be excavated and  exported over the course of one day, which is the default assumption made by CalEEMod. To accomplish  that work using haul trucks with a 16‐cubic‐yard capacity (the default assumption in CalEEMod) would      1 The word “uses” was inserted into the direct quote from SWAPE’s analysis to rectify a typographical error for readability.  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 6   require a total of approximately 832 haul truck roundtrips. Assuming a 10‐hour construction work day,  this would equate to approximately 83 roundtrips per hour,2 or one trip every 45 seconds.3 Loading a  16‐cubic‐yard haul truck in 45 seconds is not practicable given that the typical size of an excavator  bucket is approximately 1.6 cubic yards, which means approximately 10 excavator loads would need to  be excavated, transported, and dumped in the haul truck within this time frame (CAT 2020). The  applicant‐provided estimate of approximately four weeks (22 days) for site preparation results in a more  realistic haul trip scenario of approximately four haul truck trips per hour,4 or one trip every 15  minutes.5   Another relevant example is the architectural coating phase. The default phase length in CalEEMod for  the architectural coating phase is five days. Painting the exterior and interior of a five‐story building with  a gross floor area of approximately 50,231 square feet over the course of five days would not be  practicable given the default assumption in CalEEMod for a seven‐person construction crew for this  phase. Painting the interior of an approximately 132‐square‐foot room with two coats requires  approximately 4.5 to 8 hours for one person (Glidden 2020). Therefore, painting the interior of the  proposed project would require approximately 1,712 to 3,044 person‐hours,6 which equates to  approximately 24 to 43 days7 with a seven‐person construction crew, assuming a 10‐hour work day. This  phase length is consistent with the applicant’s estimated length of 43 days for the architectural coating  phase. Therefore, the construction schedule provided by the project applicant is more realistic than the  default construction schedule estimated in CalEEMod and therefore provides the basis for a more  accurate estimate of project construction emissions than would be calculated using default  assumptions. As such, no revisions to the calculations of project construction emissions are warranted in  response to this comment. Impacts would remain less than significant.  Response D.3 The commenter states an opinion that the IS‐MND does not disclose the anticipated construction  equipment list and that substantial evidence was not provided to justify the changes made to the  default horsepower, load factor, and amounts of construction equipment.  The construction equipment list utilized in CalEEMod was provided by the project applicant, who  estimated the required equipment based on the size and nature of the project and prior experience in  the building industry. Table D presents the anticipated construction equipment list utilized in CalEEMod.      2 832 roundtrips divided by 10 hours  3 60 minutes divided by 83 trips  4 832 roundtrips divided by 22 days divided by 10 hours  5 60 minutes divided by 4 trips  6 50,231 square feet divided by 132 square feet multiplied by 4.5 hours; 50,231 square feet divided by 132 square feet multiplied by 8 hours  7 1,712 person‐hours divided by seven persons divided by 10 work hours per day; 3,044 person‐hours divided by seven persons divided by 10  work hours per day  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 7   Table D Anticipated Construction Equipment List Construction Phase Equipment  Demolition Backhoe, Excavator, Signal Board  Site Preparation Backhoe, Compactor, Compressor, Excavator, Signal Board  Grading Backhoe, Compactor, Compressor, Signal Board  Building Construction Bore/Drill Rig, Crane, Rough Terrain Forklift, Generator,  Rubber Tired Loader, Signal Board  Paving Paver, Paving Equipment, Signal Board, Surfacing  Equipment  Architectural Coating Signal Board  Source: Provided by the project applicant.    The horsepower and load factor were changed from defaults for one piece of equipment to address one  of CalEEMod’s limitations. CalEEMod only allows the user to input a soil export quantity if a grader is  included in the construction equipment list for that phase. As shown in Table D, the anticipated  construction equipment list does not include a grader. Therefore, to accommodate the model limitation  while also accurately reflecting the anticipated construction equipment list, a grader was entered for the  Site Preparation phase and the default horsepower and load factor were adjusted to match those of an  excavator (158 horsepower with 0.38 load factor as shown in Table 3.3 on page D‐10 of Appendix D of  the CalEEMod User Guide), which is anticipated to be used during this phase (CAPCOA 2017, Appendix  D). As such, no revisions to the calculations of project construction emissions are warranted in response  to this comment. Impacts would remain less than significant.  Response D.4 The commenter states an opinion that the IS‐MND does not provide justification for changes in the  number of worker and vendor trips from default CalEEMod values.  The commenter is correct that the model erroneously included modified numbers of construction  worker and vendor trips. Some phases had higher trip numbers than default values (i.e., construction  worker trips for the demolition, grading, and paving phases), and some phases had lower trip numbers  than default values (i.e., construction worker trips for the building construction and architectural coating  phases and vendor trips for the building construction phase). This error has been corrected in the  modeling by restoring the numbers of construction worker and vendor trips to model defaults, and the  results are included in the revised Table 4 and revised Table 8 from the Draft IS‐MND, below. As shown  in revised Table 4, the revised modeling results in an incremental increase of 0.2 pound per day in  maximum daily emissions of reactive organic gas (ROG) and incremental decreases of 0.1 pound per day  in maximum daily emissions of carbon monoxide and exhaust particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns  or less in diameter. Project construction emissions would remain below the BAAQMD thresholds of  significance; therefore, air quality impacts related to criteria pollutant emissions during project  construction would remain less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Draft IS‐MND. As  shown in revised Table 8, the revised modeling results in an incremental increase of approximately 3.5  MT of CO2e per year of construction‐related GHG emissions. When combined with modeling revisions  under Response D.5, the project’s combined annual GHG emissions would be approximately 582 MT of  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 8   CO2e per year, which would remain below the threshold of significance of 660 MT of CO2e per year.  Therefore, GHG emissions impacts would remain less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of  the Draft IS‐MND.  Table 4 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions8  Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)    ROG NOX CO SO2  Exhaust  PM10  Exhaust  PM2.5  2020 2.6 2.5 37.5 19.6 19.5 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.9  2021 34.4 34.6 20.0 21.5 18.6 19.5 <0.1 0.8 0.9 0.8  2022 1.2 1.4 11.5 12.9 11.1 12.3 <0.1 0.5 0.4  Maximum Construction  Emissions (lbs/day) 34.4 34.6 37.5 19.6 19.5 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.9  BAAQMD Thresholds 54 54 N/A N/A 82 54  Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A N/A No No  ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SO2 = sulfur dioxide; PM10 = particulate matter measuring  10 microns in diameter or less; PM2.5 = particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns or less in diameter; lbs/day = pounds per day;  BAAQMD = Bay Area Air Quality Management District  N/A = Not available. The BAAQMD has not established recommended quantitative thresholds for CO and SO2.   Notes: All emissions modeling was completed using CalEEMod in accordance with applicant‐provided information and data. Some  numbers may not add up due to rounding. Emissions presented are the highest of the winter and summer modeled emissions. See  Attachment 3 for updated CalEEMod worksheets.  Table 8 Estimated Construction GHG Emissions9 Year Project Emissions (MT of CO2e)  2020 107.8 111.3  2021 354.9 435.0  2022 98.4 120.9  Total 561.1 667.2  Amortized over 30 Years 18.7 22.2  MT = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents  See Attachment 3 for updated CalEEMod worksheets.      8 The original Table 4 can be found in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Draft IS‐MND (page 36).  9 The original Table 8 can be found in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the Draft IS‐MND (page 72).  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 9   The revisions to the air quality and GHG emissions modeling also resulted in revised estimates of fuel  consumption during project construction, which are summarized in revised Table 5 of the Draft IS‐MND.  As shown therein, the revised modeling results in an increase in fuel consumption of approximately  10,566 gallons. Nevertheless, as stated in Section 4.6, Energy, of the Draft IS‐MND (Page 56),  construction equipment would be maintained to all applicable standards, and construction activity and  associated fuel consumption and energy use would be temporary and typical for construction sites. It is  also reasonable to assume that contractors would avoid wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary fuel  consumption during construction to reduce construction costs. Therefore, the project would not involve  the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary use of energy during construction, and the construction‐phase  impact related to energy consumption would be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of  the Draft IS‐MND.  Table 5 Estimated Fuel Consumption during Construction  Fuel Type Gallons of Fuel MMBtu4  Diesel Fuel (Construction Equipment)1 28,192 3,593  Diesel Fuel (Hauling and Vendor Trips)2 8,995 13,815 1,146 1,761  Other Petroleum Fuel (Worker Trips)3 5,740 11,486 630 1,464  Total 42,927.19 53,493 5,369 6,818  1 Fuel demand rate for construction equipment is derived from the total hours of operation, the equipment’s horse power, the  equipment’s load factor, and the equipment’s fuel usage per horse power per hour of operation, which are all taken from CalEEMod  outputs (see Appendix AQ), and from compression‐ignition engine brake‐specific fuel consumptions factors for engines between 0 to  100 horsepower and greater than 100 horsepower (U.S. EPA 2018). Fuel consumed for all construction equipment is assumed to be  diesel fuel.  2 Fuel demand rate for hauling and vendor trips (cut material imports) is derived from hauling and vendor trip number, hauling and  vendor trip length, and hauling and vendor vehicle class from “Trips and VMT” Table contained in Section 3.0, Construction Detail, of  the CalEEMod results (see Appendix AQ). The fuel economy for hauling and vendor trip vehicles is derived from the United States  Department of Transportation (DOT 2018). Fuel consumed for all hauling trucks is assumed to be diesel fuel.  3 The fuel economy for worker trip vehicles is derived from the U.S. Department of Transportation National Transportation Statistics  (24.2 mpg) (DOT 2018). Fuel consumed for all worker trips is assumed to be gasoline fuel.  4 CaRFG CA‐GREET 2.0 fuel specification of 109,786 Btu/gallon used to identify conversion rate for fuel energy consumption for worker  trips specified above (California Air Resources Board [CARB] 2015). Low‐sulfur Diesel CA‐GREET 2.0 fuel specification of 127,464  Btu/gallon used to identify conversion rate for fuel energy consumption for construction equipment specified above (CARB 2015).  Totals may not add up due to rounding.   Source: See Attachment 4 for updated energy calculations.  Response D.5 The commenter states an opinion that sufficient explanation was not provided to justify reducing the  project’s default indoor water use estimate in CalEEMod.  The project is required by the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) to achieve a 20  percent reduction in indoor water use below baseline levels. Given this objective performance criterion,  the specific measures that the project would implement to comply with this requirement are not  relevant because regardless of the measures, a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use below baseline  levels must be demonstrated. As shown in Worksheet WS‐2 of Chapter 8 of 2019 CALGreen, this  reduction may be accomplished by utilizing a variety of water‐efficient fixtures including showerheads,  faucets, aerators, wash fountains, water closets, and urinals.  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 10   The commenter is correct that the model erroneously includes both a 20 percent reduction in indoor  water use and implementation of water‐efficient fixtures, which results in double counting of water use  reductions. This error has been corrected in the modeling by removing the water‐efficient fixtures, and  the results are included in revised Table 9 from the Draft IS‐MND, which includes revisions to the  construction emissions modeling discussed under Response D.4 and shown in revised Table 8. As shown  in revised Table 9, the revised modeling results in an incremental increase of approximately 0.7 MT of  CO2e per year in emissions associated with project water use. Estimated GHG emissions would be  approximately 582 MT of CO2e per year, which would remain below the threshold of significance of 660  MT of CO2e per year. Therefore, GHG emissions impacts would remain less than significant, consistent  with the conclusions of the Draft IS‐MND. This error does not affect the criteria air pollutant emissions  modeling because emissions associated with water use are directly related to the electricity utilized to  supply, treat, and distribute water and, as noted in Section 7 on page 36 of Appendix A of the CalEEMod  User Guide, CalEEMod only calculates direct emissions of criteria pollutants from energy sources that  combust on site, such as natural gas used in a building. CalEEMod does not calculate or attribute  emissions of criteria pollutants from electricity generation to individual projects because fossil fuel  power plants are existing stationary sources permitted by air districts and/or the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, and they are subject to local, state and federal control measures. Criteria pollutant  emissions from power plants are associated with the power plants themselves, and not individual  projects or electricity users (CAPCOA 2017, Appendix A).  Table 9 Combined Annual Emissions of GHGs10 Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT of CO2e)  Construction 18.7 22.2  Operational   Area <0.1  Energy 323.3  Solid Waste 26.2  Water 2.5 3.2  Mobile   CO2 and CH4 195.4  N2O 11.2  Total 577.3 581.5  Threshold 660  Threshold Exceeded? No  MT = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents; CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrous oxide  See Attachment 3 for updated CalEEMod worksheets.      10 The original Table 9 can be found in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the Draft IS‐MND (page 73).  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 11   Response D.6 The commenter states an opinion that inclusion of mobile source, energy, and water “mitigation  measures” in CalEEMod is unsubstantiated because the project does not meet the requirements for  these measures as listed in the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (2010;  CAPCOA Guidance Document).   Several project design features were included in CalEEMod as “mitigation measures,” which is a term of  art for the modeling input and is not equivalent to mitigation measures that may apply to the CEQA  impact analysis. Because these are project design features rather than mitigation measures in the sense  used by CEQA, these measures do not require details on implementation, monitoring, or enforcement.  They will be included on the project plans, which will be reviewed and approved by the City of South San  Francisco for consistency with the IS‐MND during final plan review. Substantial evidence for the  applicability of each of these measures to the proposed project is discussed in detail below:   Improve Destination Accessibility. The project site is approximately 1.7 miles (driving distance) from  downtown South San Francisco; this value was input in CalEEMod for the Improve Destination  Accessibility feature. As shown on Page 168 of the CAPCOA Guidance Document, the standard  suburban distance to downtown/job center for a typical development is 12 miles. Therefore, this  “measure” is appropriate to use for the proposed project because it would be located only 1.7 miles  from downtown South San Francisco, and its inclusion in the model is substantiated.    Increase Transit Accessibility. The project site is located in proximity to the El Camino  Real/Southwood Drive stop for San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) ECR bus line. The  project site is approximately 150 feet (0.03 mile; walking distance) away from the northbound stop  and approximately 360 feet (0.06 mile; walking distance) away from the southbound stop. These  transit stops are therefore within the criterion of 0.25 mile (as measured from stop to edge of  development) specified in the CAPCOA Guidance Document. To provide a conservative estimate of  project emissions, a distance of 0.06 mile was utilized in the model. The Samtrans ECR bus line  provides bus service at approximately 30‐minute headways on weekdays and Saturdays and  connects to a variety of regional destinations including the San Francisco International Airport, the  San Bruno Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station, and the Colma BART station. Furthermore, the  project site is located in a neighborhood designed for walking and cycling with existing sidewalks on  both the northbound and southbound sides of El Camino Real and within 500 feet of the Centennial  Way Trail. Therefore, the measure is applicable to the project because the nearest transit stop and  the project site vicinity meet the criteria specified in the CAPCOA Guidance Document. Its inclusion  in the model is substantiated.   Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated. The proposed project would include an  approximately 50‐ to 75‐kilowatt (kW) rooftop solar system as a project design feature. Assuming  conservatively that the solar system is sized at 50 kW and given an estimated production rate of  1,800 kilowatt‐hours (kWh) per kW per year, the proposed rooftop solar system would generate  approximately 90,000 kWh per year (50 kW multiplied by 1,800 kWh per year; Zientara 2020). As  shown in Section 5.3 Energy by Land Use – Electricity of the CalEEMod Annual results for year 2030  (included as Appendix AQ of the Draft IS‐MND), the project would consume approximately 541,075  kWh of electricity per year. The current and forecast energy intensity factors for PCE of 129.77  pounds of CO2e per MWh and 105.93 pounds of CO2e per MWh, respectively, were provided on  page 71 of the Draft IS‐MND. Therefore, sufficient data is available to calculate emissions reductions  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 12   from this measure. This measure is appropriate to use for the proposed project, and its inclusion in  the model is substantiated.   Install Energy Efficient Appliances. As stated in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the Draft  IS‐MND, the project would include energy‐efficient appliances such as clothes washers, dishwashers,  fans, and refrigerators, which were included in the model. As shown in Section 5.2 Energy by Land  Use – Natural Gas of the CalEEMod Annual results (included as Appendix AQ of the Draft IS‐MND),  the project would consume approximately 1,821,370 kilo‐British thermal units of natural gas per  year. Therefore, sufficient data is available to calculate emissions reductions from this measure. This  measure is appropriate to use for the proposed project, and its inclusion in the model is  substantiated.   Install Low‐Flow Water Fixtures. As discussed in Response D.5, the model erroneously includes both  a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use and installation of water‐efficient fixtures. This error has  been corrected in the modeling, and the results are included in revised Table 9 under Response D.5.  As shown therein, project emissions without inclusion of this measure remain below the threshold  of significance; therefore, GHG emissions impacts remain less than significant, consistent with the  conclusions of the Draft IS‐MND.   Use Water Efficient Irrigation System. 2019 CALGreen mandates compliance with the current  California Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, which  requires use of automatic irrigation systems utilizing weather and/or soil moisture based irrigation  controllers (Title 23 California Code of Regulations Section 492.7). As shown in Section 7.2 Water by  Land Use of the CalEEMod Annual results (included as Appendix AQ of the Draft IS‐MND), the  project would demand approximately 259 gallons of water per year for outdoor use without use of a  water‐efficient irrigation system. Because project‐specific data on the water use reduction achieved  by the water‐efficient irrigation system was not available, the default CalEEMod assumption of a 6.1  percent reduction was utilized. Therefore, sufficient data is available to calculate emissions  reductions from this measure. This measure is appropriate to use for the proposed project, and its  inclusion in the model is substantiated.  Response E The commenter states an opinion that, based on an air quality analysis prepared by SWAPE, the project  would generate approximately 290 pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 252 pounds of  NOX per day during construction, which would exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of 54 pounds per day for  VOC and NOX. The commenter suggests that these exceedances indicate the project would result in a  significant construction‐related air quality impact.  The air quality modeling prepared by SWAPE did not take into account project‐specific information on  the anticipated construction schedule and construction equipment list. As discussed in Responses D.2  and D.3, the use of the project‐specific construction schedule and construction equipment list provides a  more realistic and accurate estimate of project emissions. SWAPE’s modeling indicates that VOC  emissions during the architectural coating phase would be approximately 290 pounds per day. However,  the modeling utilizes a default phase length of five days, and as discussed in Response D.2, it is not  reasonable to assume that the exterior and interior of a five‐story hotel with a gross floor area of  approximately 50,231 square feet could be painted by an approximately seven‐person construction  crew in five days. Therefore, SWAPE’s modeling overestimates VOC emissions during project  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 13   construction by relying on an unrealistic and unreasonable default assumption for the architectural  coating phase length. SWAPE’s modeling also indicated that NOX emissions during the grading phase  would be approximately 252 pounds per day. However, the modeling utilizes a default phase length of  two days, and as discussed in Response D.2, it is not reasonable to assume that approximately 13,300  cubic yards of soil material would be excavated and exported over the course of one to two days.  Therefore, SWAPE’s modeling overestimates NOX emissions during project construction by relying on an  unrealistic and unreasonable default assumption for the grading phase length. Therefore, the air quality  modeling included in the Draft IS‐MND provides a more accurate estimate of project construction  emissions than the modeling prepared by SWAPE. Furthermore, as shown in revised Table 4 Table under  Response D.4, project construction emissions would remain below the BAAQMD thresholds of  significance with the updated construction emissions modeling. As such, no further revisions to the  calculations of project construction emissions are warranted in response to this comment. Impacts  would remain less than significant.  Response F.1 The commenter states that the IS‐MND concludes that the health risk impact from diesel particulate  matter related to project construction and operation would be less than significant. In making this  finding, the IS‐MND does not conduct a quantified a health risk assessment (HRA) for project  construction or operation.   As stated in the SWAPE analysis, the IS‐MND analysis did address operational TAC emissions through  screening criteria developed in CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health  Perspective (2005) and the BAAQMD’s risk screening method (BAAQMD 2017). These agencies used  substantial evidence to develop these screening criteria, which are used throughout the state to screen  out projects that would not have the potential to result in TAC emissions or that would emit such low  amounts that no adverse effects would occur. Therefore, the analysis of on‐site operational TACs is  adequate given the nature of the project, which would not include a stationary source of TAC emissions.  The commenter does not disagree with this conclusion given that it focuses on mobile source TAC  emissions and does not identify any on‐site TAC emissions sources.   The commenter attempts to use the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s  (OEHHA) recommendation for short‐term projects, such as hazardous material clean up and major  construction projects, to justify the need to conduct an HRA for project operations because the project  would generate approximately 344 net new vehicle trips. However, as stated in CARB’s Air Quality and  Land Use Handbook, traffic volumes of at least 100,000 vehicle trips on urban arterials trigger the need  to assess roadway TACs emissions. Daily traffic volumes on El Camino Real (State Route 82) in the  project vicinity are approximately 48,500 vehicles per day, which would be increased to approximately  48,844 vehicles per day with project implementation (California Department of Transportation 2020).  Therefore, the project’s trip generation would not be sufficient to trigger a substantial risk from  roadway pollutants and would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to TAC  concentrations along local or area roadways. Thus, the determinations that project operation would not  result in substantial TAC emissions and that impacts would be less than significant are supported by  well‐documented guidance and procedures and by substantial evidence from agencies with expertise in  the subject area.    City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 14   While the analysis in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of the Draft IS‐MND did not specifically disclose the  analysis of construction TAC emissions, construction health risk was evaluated and determined to be  less than significant. This is due to the fact that the generation of diesel particulate matter (DPM) from  construction projects typically occurs in a single area for a short period of time. Project construction  would occur over approximately 18 months. The dose to which the receptors would be exposed is the  primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or  substances in the environment and the extent of exposure that person has with the substance. Dose is  positively correlated with time, meaning that a longer exposure period would result in a higher exposure  level for the Maximally Exposed Individual. The risks estimated for a Maximally Exposed Individual are  higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer period of time. According to the OEHHA, health risk  assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic emissions, should be based  on a 30‐year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of  activities associated with the project. Thus, the duration of proposed construction activities (i.e.,  18 months) is approximately 5 percent of the total exposure period used for health risk calculations.  Current models and methodologies for conducting HRAs are associated with longer‐term exposure  periods of 9, 30, and 70 years, which do not correlate well with the temporary and highly variable nature  of construction activities, resulting in difficulties in producing accurate estimates of health risk  (BAAQMD 2017). Additionally, as stated by OEHHA, the Hot Spots program is designed to address the  impacts of single facilities and not aggregate or cumulative impacts (OEHHA 2015).   The maximum PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would occur during demolition, site preparation and grading  activities. As shown in Table C, these activities would last for approximately 2.5 months. PM emissions  would decrease for the remaining construction period because construction activities such as building  construction and architectural coating would require less intensive construction equipment. While the  maximum DPM emissions associated with demolition, site preparation, and grading activities would only  occur for a portion of the overall construction period, these activities represent the worst‐case condition  for the total construction period. The duration of these activities would represent approximately 0.7  percent of the total 30‐year exposure period for health risk calculation. Given the aforementioned  discussion, DPM generated by project construction would not create conditions where the probability is  greater than one in one million of contracting cancer for the Maximally Exposed Individual or to  generate ground‐level concentrations of non‐carcinogenic TACs that exceed a Hazard Index greater than  one for the Maximally Exposed Individual. Therefore, project construction would not expose sensitive  receptors to substantial TAC concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant, consistent with  the conclusions of the Draft IS‐MND.  However, to satisfy the commenter’s concern, annual PM2.5 diesel exhaust emission concentrations  were modeled using OFFROAD2017 emission factors for the equipment modeled in CalEEMod.  CalEEMod is based on an out‐of‐date OFFROAD2011, which does not take into account the fleet  turnover of construction equipment associated with CARB’s In‐Use OFFROAD regulations that require  operators of construction fleets to upgrade their equipment to meet current emission standards.  Therefore, while CalEEMod is adequate for assessing mass emissions and provides a conservative  emissions estimate, OFFROAD2017 is used for HRA analysis because it is more reflective of fleet  turnover and is therefore a more accurate and realistic tool for developing basic inputs for air dispersion  modeling for risk calculation. Based on the project‐specific equipment list developed and provided by  the project applicant, project construction would generate 0.06 ton of PM2.5 diesel exhaust emissions  during the entire construction period. This would result in an annual average concentration of  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 15   0.0002970 micrometers per cubic meter (µm/m3) at the project property line, which represents a 30‐ year health risk of 0.7 in a million (see Attachment 5 for calculations). This health risk would not exceed  the threshold of one in one million for carcinogenic health risk, which supports the findings of the IS‐ MND. Therefore, while an HRA was not prepared for the project, there is substantial evidence that the  project would not result in an unacceptable risk to existing receptors or to future customers of the  proposed hotel.   Response F.2 The commenter states that a screening‐level health risk assessment performed by SWAPE indicates that  the project would result in a significant air quality impact. The commenter suggests preparation of an  Environmental Impact Report and a refined Health Risk Assessment to evaluate the project’s health risk  impacts.  Please see responses E and F.1. As discussed in those responses, the analysis conducted by SWAPE is  based on unreasonable assumptions and generic data that does not take into account site‐specific  conditions or compliance with BAAQMD rules. Additionally, the SWAPE analysis incorrectly uses PM10 as  a surrogate for DPM. As stated by CARB, “more than 90 percent of DPM is less than 1 µm in diameter  (about 1/70th the diameter of a human hair), and thus is a subset of particulate matter less than 2.5  microns in diameter (PM2.5).” Thus, the risk calculation conducted by SWAPE overstates the risk simply  by using the incorrect pollutant to model the risk. Additionally, as discussed in Response F.1, the use of  CalEEMod to estimate emissions associated with diesel exhaust risk is inappropriate as it relies on  outdated emission factors necessary for risk analysis, which should always be based on the most current  and accurate information available. Given that the risk findings presented by SWAPE are based on  inaccurate and out‐of‐date information, the assertion that an Environmental Impact Report and refined  HRA are necessary is incorrect because further analysis would not change the conclusions of the Draft  IS‐MND.   Response G.1 The commenter states an opinion that the IS‐MND incorrectly calculates the project’s GHG emissions.  The commenter claims that the IS‐MND cannot rely on the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) because it is  out of date.  As detailed in Responses D.1 through D.3, D.6, and G.2, the project’s GHG emissions were modeled  using reasonable, project‐specific assumptions and data, and substantial evidence has been provided to  justify model inputs. As discussed in Response D.4, the model erroneously modified the default numbers  of construction worker and vendor trips. In addition, as detailed in Response D.5, the model erroneously  includes both a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use and installation of water‐efficient fixtures.  These errors have been corrected in the GHG emissions modeling, and the results are included in revised  Table 9 under Response D.5. As shown therein, project emissions without inclusion of this measure  remain below the threshold of significance; therefore, GHG emissions impacts remain less than  significant.  As stated in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, on Page 70 of the Draft IS‐MND, the City’s CAP was  adopted prior to passage of SB 32 and did not include a GHG emissions reduction target for 2030  consistent with SB 32. Therefore, for development projects with post‐2020 buildout years, the City’s CAP  is not a qualified GHG reduction plan for the purposes of tiering and streamlining the analysis of GHG  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 16   emissions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. As a result, the GHG emissions analysis in the Draft  IS‐MND does not tier from the City’s CAP under the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5 but  instead uses a 2030 GHG emissions target of 660 MT of CO2e per year, as stated in Section 4.8,  Greenhouse Gas Emissions, on Page 72 of the Draft IS‐MND. Regardless of whether the City’s CAP is a  qualified GHG reduction plan per the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b)(1), it is still  appropriate to evaluate the project’s consistency with this plan under threshold (b) of Section 4.8,  Greenhouse Gas Emissions, because it is an “applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the  purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.” The Draft IS‐MND does not solely rely on the  project’s consistency with the City’s CAP for its determination that the project’s GHG emissions impacts  would be less than significant. The Draft IS‐MND also evaluates the project’s consistency with Plan Bay  Area 2040, which contains the region’s strategy for achieving the State’s SB 375 targets for GHG  emission reductions from passenger vehicles by 2020 and 2035, and compares project emissions to a  quantitative year 2030 threshold developed to be consistent with the State’s target of reducing  emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Therefore, the Draft IS‐MND adequately evaluates  the project’s GHG emission impacts in light of the State’s GHG emission reduction targets and applicable  regional and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.  Response G.2 The commenter states an opinion that, based on the analysis prepared by SWAPE, the project would  generate approximately 998 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), which would exceed  the threshold of 660 MT of CO2e per year used in the Draft IS‐MND, and approximately 4.6 MT of CO2e  per service person, which would exceed the threshold of 2.6 MT of CO2e per year suggested for use by  SWAPE. The commenter suggests that these exceedances indicate the project would result in a  significant GHG emissions impact that requires evaluation in an Environmental Impact Report and  mitigation.  The GHG emissions modeling prepared by SWAPE fails to include the following key model adjustments  to account for project design features and regulatory requirements and therefore overestimates project  emissions:   Energy Intensity Factor. The SWAPE model uses PG&E as the project’s electricity provider and does  not account for the continuing effects of the State RPS Program but rather utilizes the default  energy intensity factors for PG&E. However, PCE would provide electricity to the project; therefore,  the energy intensity factors for PCE should be utilized, as detailed in Response D.1. The use of the  default energy intensity factors for PG&E results in an overestimate of the project’s energy  emissions because, as shown in Table 1.2 on Page D‐3 of Appendix D of the CalEEMod User Guide,  these factors are based on PG&E’s eligible renewable energy procurement portfolio from 2008 at  which time PG&E had a renewable energy procurement of 12.4 percent (CAPCOA 2017, Appendix D;  California Public Utilities Commission 2011). For comparison purposes, PG&E had an eligible  renewable energy procurement of 33 percent in 2017, and PCE had an eligible renewable energy  procurement of 51 percent in 2018 (California Energy Commission 2018; PCE 2018). Both utilities are  required by the State RPS Program to achieve a 60 percent eligible renewable energy procurement  by 2030, the year for which the project’s emissions were modeled.   Operational Year. As discussed in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, on Page 72 of the Draft IS‐ MND, project emissions are estimated at year 2030 for the purposes of comparing emissions to the  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 17   year 2030 GHG emissions threshold, which is consistent with the State’s next milestone GHG  emission reduction target year and guidance from the Association of Environmental Professionals  (2016, Page 33). The SWAPE model uses an operational year of 2030, which results in an  overestimate of the project’s mobile source emissions because it does not account for increasingly  stringent vehicle emission standards that will phase in over time between the project’s buildout year  (2023) and year 2030.   Project Design Features. The SWAPE model does not include any project design features such as the  project’s proximity to downtown South San Francisco, its proximity to a transit stop, the proposed  rooftop solar system, or the proposed energy‐efficient appliances. As discussed in Response D.6,  these measures are applicable to the proposed project and are appropriate to include in the model.  Therefore, the SWAPE model overestimates the project’s energy and mobile source emissions  because it does not include these project design features.   Regulatory Requirements. The SWAPE model does not account for the regulatory requirements of  CALGreen pertaining to water use. As detailed on Page 40 of Appendix A of the CalEEMod User  Guide, the default indoor and outdoor water use estimates are based on data obtained from the  Pacific Institute’s 2003 “Waste Not Want Not” report, which was published prior to the adoption of  the first iteration of CALGreen in 2008. The current (2019) version of CALGreen requires a 20  percent reduction in indoor water use in addition to compliance with the current California  Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, which requires the  use of water‐efficient irrigation systems. Therefore, the SWAPE model overestimates the project’s  water emissions because it does not adjust the default water usage estimate, which is based on data  from 2003, for current (2019) regulatory requirements.  Given the above discussion, the GHG emissions modeling prepared by SWAPE overestimates project  emissions. As shown in revised Table 9 under Response D.5, project emissions would be approximately  582 MT of CO2e per year, which would remain below the threshold of significance of 660 MT of CO2e per  year. Therefore, project emissions do not need to be evaluated on a per‐service‐person basis, and GHG  emissions impacts would remain less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Draft IS‐ MND.  Thank you for the opportunity to assist with this assignment. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you  have questions about the responses provided in this letter.  Sincerely,   Rincon Consultants, Inc.      Darcy Kremin, AICP Abe Leider, AICP CEP  Project Manager Principal     City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 18   Attachments Attachment 1 Annotated Comment Letter  Attachment 2 Reference Documentation  Attachment 3 Updated CalEEMod Worksheets  Attachment 4 Updated Energy Calculations  Attachment 5 Construction Health Risk Screening Calculations     City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 19   References Association of Environmental Professionals. 2016. Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA  Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California. October 18, 2016.  https://califaep.org/docs/AEP‐2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf (accessed June 2020).  Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air  Quality Guidelines. May 2017. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning‐and‐ research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017‐pdf.pdf?la=en (accessed June 2020).  Brown, Leslie. 2019. Director of Customer Care, Peninsula Clean Energy. Personal communication via  email regarding Peninsula Clean Energy’s energy intensity factor with Annaliese Miller, Associate  Environmental Planner, Rincon Consultants, Inc. November 25, 2019.  California Air Resources Board (CARB). “Overview: Diesel Exhaust & Health.”  https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview‐diesel‐exhaust‐and‐ health#:~:text=The%20solid%20material%20in%20diesel,Most%20PM2 (accessed June 2020).  California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas  Mitigation Measures. August 2010.  ____. 2017. California Emissions Estimator Model User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2. November 2017.  California Department of Transportation. 2020. “Traffic Volumes: Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT).”  https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic‐operations/census (accessed May 2020).  California Energy Commission. 2018. “2017 Power Content Label – Pacific Gas and Electric Company.”  July 2018. https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/PG_and_E_2017_PCL.pdf  (accessed June 2020).  California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk  Assessment Guidelines. February 2015.  California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2011. Renewables Portfolio Standard Quarterly Report. 1st  Quarter 2011. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=5858  CAT. 2020. “Excavators – 320.”  https://www.cat.com/en_US/products/new/equipment/excavators/medium‐ excavators/1000032602.html# (accessed June 2020).  Flores, Areana. 2020. Environmental Planner. Personal communication via email regarding BAAQMD  screening criteria with Annaliese Miller, Associate Environmental Planner, Rincon Consultants,  Inc. June 17, 2020.  Glidden. 2020. “How Long Does It Take to Paint a Bedroom?” https://www.glidden.com/inspiration/all‐ articles/how‐long‐does‐it‐take‐to‐paint‐a‐bedroom (accessed June 2020).  Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE). 2018. “Energy Sources.” https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/energy‐ sources/ (accessed November 2019).  San Mateo County Transit District. 2020. “Route ECR.”   https://www.samtrans.com/schedulesandmaps/timetables/ECR.html (accessed June 2020).  City of South San Francisco Response to Selected Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project IS-MND   Page 20   Zientara, Ben. 2020. “How much electricity does a solar panel produce?” April 2, 2020.  https://www.solarpowerrocks.com/solar‐basics/how‐much‐electricity‐does‐a‐solar‐panel‐ produce/ (accessed June 2020).      Attachment 1 Annotated Comment Letter  May 14, 2020 Via E-mail Justin Shiu, Consultant Planner City of South San Francisco Economic & Community Development Department 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Justin.Shiu@ssf.net Re: Comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project Dear Honorable Members of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission and Ms. Wan: I am writing on behalf of Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No. 270 and its members living in and around the City of South San Francisco (“LIUNA”) regarding the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the 840 El Camino real Hotel Project proposed for South San Francisco (the “Project”). After reviewing the IS/MND, we conclude that it fails to analyze all environmental impacts and to implement all necessary mitigation measures. LIUNA respectfully requests that the City of South San Francisco (“the City”) prepare an EIR in order to incorporate our concerns discussed below. This comment has been prepared with the assistance of Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis “Bud” Offermann, PE, CIH. Mr. Offerman’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This comment is also prepared with the assistance of noise expert Derek Watry of the acoustics firm Wilson Ihrig. Mr. Watry reviewed the IS/MND and its noise appendix and determined that Project construction will have a significant noise impact on adjacent residential properties that must be analyzed and mitigated in an EIR. Mr. Watry’s comments are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Finally, this comment has been prepared with the assistance of the environmental consulting firm Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”). SWAPE’s comment the consultants’ curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit C hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 2 of 17 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project involves the demotion of an existing 2,000 square foot commercial building and associated parking lots, and construction of a new hotel building at 840 El Camino Real, in the City of South San Francisco. The hotel would be 50,231 gross square feet, and include 95 guest rooms over five stories, with two levels of subterranean parking. The existing building is vacant, and used to operate as an Arby’s, but has been closed for several years. Operation of the hotel is expected to require approximately 10 employees at a time. The Project site is located immediately adjacent to West Coast Auto Service and Daland Body shop to the north, single family residences to the east, and the All Seasons Lodge hotel to the south. Three schools are within 0.25 mile of the project site. R.W. Drake Preschool Center is located approximately 360 feet to the west, Los Cerritos Elementary is located approximately 0.2 miles southeast and Baden High School is located approximately 0.24 miles southwest. II. LEGAL STANDARD As the California Supreme Court has held, “[i]f no EIR has been prepared for a nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an EIR.” Communities for a Better Env’t v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, 319-320 (CBE v. SCAQMD) (citing No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75, 88; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491, 504–505). “Significant environmental effect” is defined very broadly as “a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment.” Pub. Res. Code (“PRC”) § 21068; see also 14 CCR § 15382. An effect on the environment need not be “momentous” to meet the CEQA test for significance; it is enough that the impacts are “not trivial.” No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at 83. “The ‘foremost principle’ in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.” Communities for a Better Env’t v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 109 (CBE v. CRA). The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 (Bakersfield Citizens); Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927. The EIR is an “environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached the ecological points of no return.” Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1220. The EIR also functions as a “document of accountability,” intended to “demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action.” Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392. The EIR process “protects not only the environment but also informed self- government.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. An EIR is required if “there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC § 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 3 of 17 21080(d); see also Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. In very limited circumstances, an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement briefly indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR § 15371), only if there is not even a “fair argument” that the project will have a significant environmental effect. PRC, §§ 21100, 21064. Since “[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . . . has a terminal effect on the environmental review process,” by allowing the agency “to dispense with the duty [to prepare an EIR],” negative declarations are allowed only in cases where “the proposed project will not affect the environment at all.” Citizens of Lake Murray v. San Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440. Where an initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, a mitigated negative declaration may be appropriate. However, a mitigated negative declaration is proper only if the project revisions would avoid or mitigate the potentially significant effects identified in the initial study “to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and…there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC §§ 21064.5 and 21080(c)(2); Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 331. In that context, “may” means a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. PRC §§ 21082.2(a), 21100, 21151(a); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927; League for Protection of Oakland's etc. Historic Res. v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904–05. Under the “fair argument” standard, an EIR is required if any substantial evidence in the record indicates that a project may have an adverse environmental effect—even if contrary evidence exists to support the agency’s decision. 14 CCR § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 931; Stanislaus Audubon Society v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150-51; Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602. The “fair argument” standard creates a “low threshold” favoring environmental review through an EIR rather than through issuance of negative declarations or notices of exemption from CEQA. Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928. The “fair argument” standard is virtually the opposite of the typical deferential standard accorded to agencies. As a leading CEQA treatise explains: This ‘fair argument’ standard is very different from the standard normally followed by public agencies in making administrative determinations. Ordinarily, public agencies weigh the evidence in the record before them and reach a decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. [Citations]. The fair argument standard, by contrast, prevents the lead agency from weighing competing evidence to determine who has a better argument concerning the likelihood or extent of a potential environmental impact. The lead agency’s decision is thus largely legal rather than factual; it does not resolve conflicts in the evidence but determines only whether substantial evidence exists in the record to support the prescribed fair argument. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 4 of 17 Kostka & Zishcke, Practice Under CEQA, §6.29, pp. 273-274. The Courts have explained that “it is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument exists, and the courts owe no deference to the lead agency’s determination. Review is de novo, with a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928 (emphasis in original). III. DISCUSSION A. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have a Significant Health Risk Impact from its Indoor Air Quality Impacts. Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis “Bud” Offermann, PE, CIH, has conducted a review of the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project’s indoor air emissions. Indoor Environmental Engineering Comments (April 28, 2020) (Exhibit A). Mr. Offermann concludes that it is likely that the Project will expose employees of the Project to significant impacts related to indoor air quality, and in particular, emissions of the cancer- causing chemical formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann is a leading expert on indoor air quality and has published extensively on the topic. See attached CV. Mr. Offermann explains that many composite wood products used in building materials and furnishings commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences, and hotels contain formaldehyde-based glues which off-gas formaldehyde over a very long time period. He states, “The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims.” Offermann, pp. 2-3. Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen. Mr. Offermann states that there is a fair argument that future employees of the hotel will be exposed to a cancer risk from formaldehyde of approximately 16.4 per million, assuming all materials are compliant with the California Air Resources Board’s formaldehyde airborne toxics control measure. Id., p. 4. This exceeds the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (“BAAQMD”) CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk of 10 per million. Id. Mr. Offermann concludes that these significant environmental impacts should be analyzed in an EIR and mitigation measures should be imposed to reduce the risk of formaldehyde exposure. Id. Mr. Offermann also notes that the high cancer risk that may be posed by the Project’s indoor air emissions likely will be exacerbated by the additional cancer risk that exists as a result of the Project’s location near roadways with moderate to high traffic (i.e. El Camino Real, A Street, 1st Street, 2nd Street, etc.) and the high levels of PM 2.5 already present in the ambient air. Offermann, pp. 9-10. No analysis has been conducted of the significant cumulative health impacts that will result to future employees of the Project. Mr. Offermann concludes that these significant environmental impacts should be analyzed in an EIR and mitigation measures should be imposed to reduce the risk of 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 5 of 17 formaldehyde exposure. Id. at 4. Mr. Offermann identifies mitigation measures that are available to reduce these significant health risks, including the installation of air filters and a requirement that the applicant use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins in the buildings’ interiors. Id. at 11-12. The City has a duty to investigate issues relating to a project’s potential environmental impacts, especially those issues raised by an expert’s comments. See Cty. Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. Cty. of Kern, (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1597–98 (“under CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts”). In addition to assessing the Project’s potential health impacts to employees, Mr. Offermann identifies the investigatory path that the City should be following in developing an EIR to more precisely evaluate the Projects’ future formaldehyde emissions and establishing mitigation measures that reduce the cancer risk below the BAAQMD level. Id., pp. 5-10. Such an analysis would be similar in form to the air quality modeling and traffic modeling typically conducted as part of a CEQA review. The failure to address the project’s formaldehyde emissions is contrary to the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Ass’n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 386 (“CBIA”). At issue in CBIA was whether the Air District could enact CEQA guidelines that advised lead agencies that they must analyze the impacts of adjacent environmental conditions on a project. The Supreme Court held that CEQA does not generally require lead agencies to consider the environment’s effects on a project. CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800- 801. However, to the extent a project may exacerbate existing adverse environmental conditions at or near a project site, those would still have to be considered pursuant to CEQA. Id. at 801 (“CEQA calls upon an agency to evaluate existing conditions in order to assess whether a project could exacerbate hazards that are already present”). In so holding, the Court expressly held that CEQA’s statutory language required lead agencies to disclose and analyze “impacts on a project’s users or residents that arise from the project’s effects on the environment.” Id. at 800 (emphasis added). The carcinogenic formaldehyde emissions identified by Mr. Offermann are not an existing environmental condition. Those emissions to the air will be from the Project. Employees will be users of the Project. Currently, there is presumably little if any formaldehyde emissions at the site. Once the project is built, emissions will begin at levels that pose significant health risks. Rather than excusing the City from addressing the impacts of carcinogens emitted into the indoor air from the project, the Supreme Court in CBIA expressly finds that this type of effect by the project on the environment and a “project’s users and residents” must be addressed in the CEQA process. The Supreme Court’s reasoning is well-grounded in CEQA’s statutory language. CEQA expressly includes a project’s effects on human beings as an effect on the environment that must be addressed in an environmental review. “Section 21083(b)(3)’s express language, for example, requires a finding of a ‘significant effect on the environment’ (§ 21083(b)) whenever the ‘environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 6 of 17 directly or indirectly.’” CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800 (emphasis in original). Likewise, “the Legislature has made clear—in declarations accompanying CEQA’s enactment—that public health and safety are of great importance in the statutory scheme.” Id., citing e.g., §§ 21000, subds. (b), (c), (d), (g), 21001, subds. (b), (d). It goes without saying that the future employees of the Project are human beings and the health and safety of those workers is as important to CEQA’s safeguards as nearby residents currently living near the project site. Because Mr. Offermann’s expert review is substantial evidence of a fair argument of a significant environmental impact to future users of the project, an EIR must be prepared to disclose and mitigate those impacts. B. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have a Significant Noise Impact. 1. Contrary to the IS/MND’s conclusion, the Project will have a significant noise impact from noise generated during Project construction. Noise expert Derek Watry reviewed the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project’s noise impacts and concluded that the MND improperly analyzed construction noise levels. Mr. Watry concludes that when analyzed properly, construction noise levels during construction would create a significant noise impact. Watry, p. 1. As a threshold of significance, the IS/MND relies on the following standard as a threshold of significance, taken from South San Francisco Municipal Code section 8.32.050(d)(2): The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed ninety dB. There are two problems with the IS/MND’s noise analysis based on this threshold of significance. First, the IS/MND relies on average noise levels, rather than maximum noise levels. Watry, p. 2. “This is inconsistent with the noise ordinance, which does not limit the average noise level, but rather prohibits any noise above 90 dBA.” Watry, p. 2. While Appendix NOI includes calculations for both the maximum and average noise levels, only the average levels are relied on in the body of the IS/MND, and it is the average numbers that are included in Table 15 and compared to the threshold of significance.1 Reliance on the average noise levels is inconsistent with the Municipal Code. Second, the IS/MND erroneously calculated distance to relevant building facades rather than the relevant property planes, despite the clear language of the code that requires assessment to “any point outside of the property plane of the project.” Watry, p. 2. 1 Despite the statement on page 101 that “Table 15 shows the maximum expected construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptor . . .”, the data in Table 15 are actually the average construction noise levels (“Leq”), not the maximum levels (“Lmax”). 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 7 of 17 In determining significance, the MND’s “construction noise analysis analyzes the noise levels at two receptors, (i) the neighboring All Season Lodge south of the project site and (ii) the nearest private residences east of the project site. Watry, pp. 1-2. The analysis is based on the closest distance from the “anticipated edge of the construction site” to each of these two buildings, which the MND states are 20 and 70 feet respectively to the hotel and the homes. Id. at 2 (citing IS/MND, p. 101). As Mr. Watry explains in his comment, “[i]n the case of the private residences on A Street, the IS/MND uses a distance of 70 feet, however, the site plan in the IS/MND clearly shows that the proposed hotel will be only 15 feet from the property plane.” Id (citing IS/MND, p. 8, Figure 3). As Mr. Watry explains in his comment, the maximum noise level during any phase of construction is determined by the single loudest piece of equipment. Watry, p. 3. When based on the correct distance of 15 feet from the adjacent residential property plane, Mr. Watry calculated the maximum noise levels for each construction phase using information taken directly from the IS/MND analysis. Id. Mr. Watry determined that the maximum noise level will exceed the threshold of significance for four of the five phases of construction. This Phase Loudest Equipment Max Level at 50 ft Max Level at 15 ft Demolition Excavator 80.7 dBA 91.2 dBA Grading Compactor (ground) 83.2 dBA 93.7 dBA Site Prep Compactor (ground) 83.2 dBA 93.7 dBA Construction Crane & Generator 80.6 dBA 91.1 dBA Paving Paver 77.2 dBA 87.7 dBA As Mr. Watry’s calculations demonstrate, “the maximum noise level will exceed the CSSF Municipal Code limit at the residential property plane for all but the last phase of construction. Because 90 dBA limit at the property plane is the adopted threshold of significance, construction noise should identified as a significant noise impact.” Watry, p. 3. 2. Project construction will a significant impact on ambient noise which was not analyzed in the IS/MND. CEQA also requires an analysis of whether a project will generate a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity, yet the IS/MND fails to do so. Watry, p. 3; CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G. Enough information is included in the IS/MD that Mr. Watry was able to conduct this analysis. The IS/MND includes noise measurements taken at the “Back of project site, adjacent to the back of A Street Residences.” Watry, p. 3. The average ambient average noise level was 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 8 of 17 63.4 dBA, with the primary noise source being traffic on El Camino Real. Id.; IS/MND, p. 97, table 13. Mr. Watry explains that the Project site elevation is higher than the adjacent residential back yards, with the Project property built up behind a retaining wall. Id. at 3 to 4. This elevation change is relevant to the ambient noise analysis but was not taken into account in the IS/MND. According to Mr. Watry: Because there is a large, sharp change in elevation between the project site and the residential backyard, the traffic noise from El Camino Real is shielded by what is effectively an 8-foot sound barrier wall (see sketch below). It is reasonable to assume that the difference is 5 dB, the minimal amount for a wall that breaks the line-of-sight between a noise source and a receiver by a few feet. With the inclusion of the 5 dB noise reduction associated with the elevation change, a reasonable estimate of the existing ambient noise level in the backyards is 58.4 dBA Leq. Id. While much of the noise from traffic on El Camino Real is attenuated by the elevation change, that is not true of the noise made by construction equipment on the Project site. This is because: “(i) it will operate much nearer to the property plane, and (ii) the main noise source is the top of the exhaust stack which is typically 7 to 8 feet high (to minimize workers breathing exhaust fumes). Given these two conditions, the exhaust stack will be visible from the backyards for much of the time.” Watry, p. 4. Mr. Watry calculated the increased above existing ambient noise levels during each phase of construction, with the results in the table below. Phase Avg (Leq) Noise Level Increase Above Existing Ambient Demolition 74.4 dBA 16.0 dB Grading 75.4 dBA 17.0 dB Site Prep 77.2 dBA 18.8 dB Construction 76.9 dBA 18.5 dB Paving 70.1 dBA 11.7 dB As the IS/MND itself states, an increase of 10 dBA sounds twice as loud. Watry, p. 5; IS/MND at p. 96. This is a significant increase in ambient noise that will impact residents for at least 18 months. Mr. Watry explains that: [I]t is common practice to use 10 dB as the threshold of significance for temporary increases in ambient noise levels. As the table above indicates, this threshold will be exceeded for all phases of construction. Furthermore, it will exceed 15 dB for four of the five construction phases, the majority of the project development time. Therefore, the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 9 of 17 temporary increase in ambient noise levels brought about by the construction of the project should be identified as a significant noise impact. Id. at 5. Mr. Watry’s expert comments constitute substantial evidence of a significant impact that was not disclosed, analyzed, or mitigated in the IS/MND. An EIR is required to address this significant impact. C.The IS/MND’s conclusion that the Project will not have significant operational air quality impacts from criteria pollutant emissions is not supported by substantial evidence. The IS/MND concludes that the Project will not have significant operational air quality impacts, but no evaluation was conducted to determine Project emissions. IS/MND, p. 37. Instead, the IS/MND claims that the Project is less than the BAAQMD’s screening level size, and as a result, there is no need to evaluate the Project’s criteria pollution emissions. Specifically, the IS/MND states: The BAAQMD operational screening level size for hotels is 489 guest rooms. The proposed project includes 95 guest rooms and therefore is below the screening size. As a result, per BAAQMD guidance, a detailed air quality assessment of their project’s criteria air pollutant emissions is not necessary, and project operation would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Impacts would be less than significant. Id. The problem with the above statements is that they are inconsistent with the BAAQMD’s 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. SWAPE, p. 2. According to the Guidelines, the operational criteria pollutant screening size of a 489-room hotel only applies to operational NOx emissions, as shown in the excerpt below.2 The screening threshold for hotels says nothing about whether the a hotel with fewer than 489 rooms would result in significant emissions of other criteria pollutants such as CO, PM2.5, PM10, or SOx. Id. Without having conducted a quantitative analysis of the Project’s operational emissions, there is no evidence to support the IS/MND’s finding that the Project’s emissions of these criteria pollutants will not result in a significant impact. 2 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 3- 2, Table 3-1. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 10 of 17 D. The IS/MND Relied on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project Emissions and Thus Failed to Adequately Analyze the Project’s Air Quality Impacts. The IS/MND for the Project relies on emissions calculated from the California Emissions Estimator Model Version CalEEMod.2016.3.2 (“CalEEMod”). This model relies on recommended default values for on-site specific information related to a number of factors. The model is used to generate a project’s construction and operational emissions. SWAPE reviewed the Project’s CalEEMod output files and found that the values input into the model were unsubstantiated or inconsistent with information provided in the IS/MND. This results in an underestimation of the Project’s emissions. As a result, the IS/MND is not supported by substantial evidence. When correct inputs were used in an updated model, SWAPE determined that the Project may have significant air quality impacts. An EIR is required to properly analyze these potential impacts. 1. The IS/MND relied on an unsubstantiated utility company and associated intensity factors. The CalEEMod output files demonstrate that the utility company was entered as “User Defined,” and CO2 intensity factor of 105.93, a CH4 intensity factor of 0 and an N2O intensity factor of 0 were manually entered. SWAPE, p. 3 (citing IS/MND Appendix AQ, pp. 148, 180). According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification for this was “Peninsula Clean Energy.” IS/MND, Appendix AQ, p. 181. SWAPE points out that this change is not substantiated and incorrect for two reasons. First, three is no evidence to support the intensity factors assumed by the model. SWAPE, p. 3. Second, the IS/MND states that PG&E would provide natural gas to the Project site, with Peninsula Clean Energy providing electricity. IS/MND, p. 22. It was therefore incorrect for the model to assume that the only utility – and associated intensity factors – would be Peninsula Clean Energy. By using an unsubstantiated intensity factors, the model underestimates Project emissions. 2. The IS/MND made unsubstantiated changes to the construction schedule. The CalEEMod output files indicate that several changes were made to the default construction period for the Project. IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 182. As the excerpt below demonstrates, the time period for each construction phase was increased from the default value. Id. According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification for these changes was: “Applicant provided schedule.” Id. at Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181. The IS/MND states similarly that “The construction schedule and list of construction equipment were based on applicant-provided data.” IS/MND, p. 36. These conclusory statements do not constitute subtantail evidence that would justify the dramatic changes from default construction times. Moreover, the IS/MND does not specify what the construction schedule would actually be. As SWAPE explains, “spreading out construction emissions over a longer period than is expected results in an underestimation of the maximum daily emissions associated with construction.” SWAPE, p. 4. Unless additional evidence is provided as to why every phase of 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 11 of 17 construction would take between 3.5 and 22 times longer than normal, reliance on the revised construction schedule is not supported by substantial evidence and underestimates the Project’s construction emissions. Id. 3. The IS/MND relied on unsubstantiated changes to off-road construction equipment horsepower, load factor, and unit amount. The CalEEMod output files show that the model’s off-road construction equipment horsepower, load factor, and unit amounts were manually reduced. SWAPE, p. 4 (citing IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 180). The “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” provided the following justification: “Applicant-provided list.” Id. (citing IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp.149, 181). Despite these changes, he IS/MND never discloses the “Applicant-provided” construction equipment list that would justify these changes. SWAPE, p. 4. 4. The IS/MND relied on an unsubstantiated number of worker and vendor trips. The CalEEMod output files show that several changes were made to the Project’s anticipated number of vendor and worker trips. SWAPE, p. 5 (citing IS/MND Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 180). According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “Applicant provided.” Id. (citing IS/MND Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). As with the changes to construction equipment inputs, the IS/MND provides no justification for these changes in the number of worker and vendor trips from default values. 5. The IS/MND relied on an unsubstantiated change to indoor water use rate. The Project’s indoor water use rate was manually reduced from 2,409,843.15 gallons per year (“gpy”) to 1,927,875 gpy, a reduction of approximately 20%. SWAPE, p. 5 (citing IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 182). According to the “User Entered Comments & Non- Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen.” SWAPE, p. 5, (citing IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). The IS/MND also states: Modeling of GHG emissions from water consumption and wastewater generation includes a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use to account for compliance with 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 12 of 17 CALGreen, use of low-flow fixtures, and installation of a water-efficient irrigation system. IS/MND, p. 71. These explanations are not sufficient to justify the changes to the CalEEMod model. SWAPE, p. 6. First, the IS/MND fails to describe which measures it will actually implement to allow the Project to achieve a 20% reduction in indoor water use. Id. Second, water use reductions are already accounted for by the model’s water-related operational mitigation measures. Id. (citing IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp. 178, 212). The model is double counting water use reductions by including both the water-related operational mitigation measures and a 20% reduction of the Project’s indoor water use rate. Id. 6. The IS/MND relied on unsubstantiated mobile, energy, and water-related operational mitigation measures. The CalEEMod output files show that the model included the following mobile, energy, and water-related operational mitigation measures: • Mobile Mitigation Measures: o Improve Destination Accessibility o Increase Transit Accessibility • Energy Mitigation Measures o Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated o Install Energy Efficient Appliances • Water Mitigation Measures o Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet o Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet o Install Low Flow Toilet o Install Low Flow Shower o Use Water Efficient Irrigation System IS/MND, Appendix AQ, pp, 173, 175, 178, 206, 208, 212. SWAPE concludes that inclusion of these mitigation measures is unsubstantiated. SWAPE, p. 7. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, The mitigation measures included in CalEEMod are largely based on the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/downloads/2010/09/CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf) document. The CAPCOA measure numbers are provided next to the mitigation measures in CalEEMod to assist the user in understanding each measure by referencing back to the CAPCOA document. Id. As SWAPE explains in their comments, the IS/MND fails to meet the requirements for including these mitigation measures in the CalEEMod model. Id. at 7-11. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 13 of 17 E. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project may have a Significant Air Quality Impact. SWAPE prepared an updated CalEEMod for the Project, correcting the errors discussed above. SWAPE’s model demonstrates that the Project’s construction-related VOC and NOx emissions exceed the BAAQMD’s 54 lbs/day threshold of significance. SWAPE, p. 11. Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Model VOC NOx SWAPE 290 252 BAAQMD Regional Threshold (lbs/day) 54 54 Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes SWAPE’s expert comments constitute substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant construction-related air quality impact. CEQA requires this impact be analyzed and mitigated in an EIR. F. The IS/MND Failed to Adequately Evaluate Health Risks from Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions 1. The IS/MND lacks substantial evidence to support its finding that the Project’s emissions will not cause a significant health impact. The IS/MND concludes that the health risk impact from diesel particulate matter related to Project construction and operation will be less than significant. In making this finding, the IS/MND does not conduct a quantified a health risk assessment (“HRA”) for Project construction or operation. SWAPE, p. 11. The IS/MND attempts does not address its failure to conduct a construction HRA, but it does attempt to justify omission of an operational HRA by stating: Common sources of TACs include, but are not limited to, land uses such as freeways and high-volume roadways, truck distribution centers, ports, rail yards, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners using perchloroethylene, and gasoline dispensing facilities (BAAQMD 2017c). The proposed project does not involve any of these uses; therefore, it is not considered a common source of TACs...Therefore, project operation would not generate a substantial amount of TAC emissions that could affect nearby sensitive receptors, and impacts would be less than significant. IS/MND, p. 39. SWAPE explains that this justification and the IS/MND’s conclusion that the Project will not have a significant health risk impact are incorrect. First, the IS/MND’s failure to conduct a construction HRA is inconsistent with the approach recommended by the California Office of 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 14 of 17 Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), which is the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California. SWAPE, p. 12. OEHHA recommends all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. Id. Here, Project construction is expected to last 561 days, much longer than two months. Id. As a result, a health risk assessment should have been conducted to determine health risk impacts from the Project’s construction emissions. Id. Second, the fact that the Project does not involve commons sources of TACs is not evidence that the Project will not produce significant TACs that may impact human health, and does not justify failing to conduct an operational HRA. Id. As SWAPE explains: According to the IS/MND’s Traffic Impact Study (“TIS”), provided as Appendix TRA to the IS/MND, Project operation will generate approximately 344 daily vehicle trips, which will generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (Appendix TRA, p. 22). The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).3 Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, we recommend that health risks from Project operation also should have been evaluated, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA. Id. Without conducting an HRA for Project construction or operation, the City lacks substantial evidence to support the IS/MND’s conclusion that the Project will not have a significant health risk impact. 2. SWAPE conducted a screening-level health risk assessment that indicates a significant health risk impact. SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from Project construction and operation. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. SWAPE, p. 13. SWAPE used a sensitive receptor distance of 25 meters, which is the location of the maximally exposed receptor,4 and analyzed impacts to individuals at 3 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p. 8-6, 8-15 4 The closest sensitive receptor is located 18 meters from the Project site. However, 100 meters was used in the HRA based on AERSCREEN output files which demonstrate that the maximally exposed receptor is located 100 meters from the Project site. SWAPE, p. 12. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 15 of 17 different stages of life based on OEHHA and BAAQMD guidance utilizing age sensitivity factors. SWAPE, pp. 13-16. SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk for adults, children, infants, and during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy at a sensitive receptor located approximately 25 meters away over the course of Project construction and operation are approximately 23, 150, 270, and 12 in one million, respectively. SWAPE, p. 16. Moreover, the excess lifetime cancer risk over the course of a Project operation is approximately 450 in one million. Id. The risks to adults, children, infants, during 3rd trimester pregnancy, and lifetime residents appreciably exceed the BAAQMD’s threshold of 10 in one million. SWAPE’s analysis constitutes substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant health impact as a result of diesel particulate emissions. The City must prepare an EIR with a more refined HRA that is representative of site conditions in order to evaluate the Project’s health risk impact and to include suitable mitigation measures. G. Contrary to the IS/MND’s Conclusion, the Project Will Have a Significant GHG Impact. 1. The IS/MND’s GHG analysis violates CEQA. The IS/MND claims that the Project would not have a significant greenhouse gas (“GHG”) impact because: 1) according to the IS/MND annual Project emissions would be 577 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/yr”), which would be less than the BAAQMD threshold of 660 MT CO2e/yr, and 2) according to the IS/MND, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, the Project would be consistent with the City of South San Francisco CAP. SWAPE, p. 17 (citing IS/MND, pp. 72-74). The IS/MND’s justifications and conclusion that the Project’s GHG impacts are less-than-significant violate CEQA for a number of reasons. First, the IS/MND’s determination that the Project’s GHG emissions would be 577 MT CO2e/yr is not supported by substantial evidence because the number is based on incorrect and unsubstantiated air model inputs, as described above. SWAPE, p. 17. Second, the IS/MND cannot rely on the City’s CAP because it is out of date. The IS/MND itself admits that “The City’s CAP is not a qualified GHG Reduction Strategy because it does not establish a 2030 GHG emissions reduction target consistent with SB 32.” IS/MND, p. 72. Without emissions reduction targets consistency with SB 32, consistency with the City’s CAP is not evidence that the Project will not have a significant GHG impact. 2. The Project will have a significant GHG impact. Using the updated CalEEMod model discussed above, SWAPE determined that the Project may have a significant GHG impact. SWAPE, p. 18. The updated model discloses annual operational GHG emissions of approximately 998 MT CO2e/year. Id. This exceeds the BAAQMD threshold of significance of 660 MT CO2e/year. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 16 of 17 SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Area 0.003 Energy 621.496 Mobile 343.272 Waste 26.156 Water 7.362 Total 998.290 Threshold 660 Exceed? Yes Because the BAAQMD’s 660 MT CO2e/year threshold is exceeded, a service population analysis is warranted. Since the IS/MND did not provide an estimated number of total employees, SWAPE used the US. Department of Energy’s square foot per employees value. SWAPE, p. 18. SWAPE found that, dividing the Project’s GHG emission by its estimated service population of 123 people means that the Project would emit approximately 8.1 MT CO2e/SP/year, which exceeds the BAAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 2.6 of MT CO2e/SP/year and the 2020 BAAQMD service population efficiency threshold of 4.6 MT CO2e/SP/year. Id. at 18-19. SWAPE Service Population Efficiency Analysis Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Annual GHG Emissions 998.3 Service Population 123 Service Population Efficiency 8.1 Threshold 4.6 Exceed? Yes Threshold 2.6 Exceed? Yes SWAPE’s comments constitute substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant greenhouse gas impact. This impact must be fully analyzed and mitigated in an EIR. SWAPE’s comments include a number of mitigation measures available to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions, and these should all be considered by the City. 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project May 14, 2020 Page 17 of 17 IV. CONCLUSION In light of the above comments, the City must prepare an EIR for the Project and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Rebecca L. Davis Lozeau | Drury LLP     EXHIBIT A  INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 1448 Pine Street, Suite 103 San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 567-7700 E-mail: offermann@IEE-SF.com http://www.iee-sf.com Date: April 28, 2020 To: Rebecca Davis Lozeau | Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, California 94612 From: Francis J. Offermann PE CIH Subject: Indoor Air Quality: 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project – South San Francisco, CA (IEE File Reference: P-4355) Pages: 19 Indoor Air Quality Impacts Indoor air quality (IAQ) directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants, and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a well- recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014). Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors with the majority of this time spent at home (EPA, 2011). Some segments of the population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously. Additionally, an increasing number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek. Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments. The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain and release a variety of pollutants to air (Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson, 2 of 19 2011). With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants. Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Impact. In the California New Home Study (CNHS) of 108 new homes in California (Offermann, 2009), 25 air contaminants were measured, and formaldehyde was identified as the indoor air contaminant with the highest cancer risk as determined by the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), No Significant Risk Levels (NSRL) for carcinogens. The NSRL is the daily intake level calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000 (i.e., ten in one million cancer risk) and for formaldehyde is 40 µg/day. The NSRL concentration of formaldehyde that represents a daily dose of 40 µg is 2 µg/m3, assuming a continuous 24-hour exposure, a total daily inhaled air volume of 20 m3, and 100% absorption by the respiratory system. All of the CNHS homes exceeded this NSRL concentration of 2 µg/m3. The median indoor formaldehyde concentration was 36 µg/m3, and ranged from 4.8 to 136 µg/m3, which corresponds to a median exceedance of the 2 µg/m3 NSRL concentration of 18 and a range of 2.3 to 68. Therefore, the cancer risk of a resident living in a California home with the median indoor formaldehyde concentration of 36 µg/m3, is 180 per million as a result of formaldehyde alone. The CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk is 10 per million, as established by the Bay Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD, 2017). Besides being a human carcinogen, formaldehyde is also a potent eye and respiratory irritant. In the CNHS, many homes exceeded the non-cancer reference exposure levels (RELs) prescribed by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2017b). The percentage of homes exceeding the RELs ranged from 98% for the Chronic REL of 9 µg/m3 to 28% for the Acute REL of 55 µg/m3. The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and 3 of 19 particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims. In January 2009, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an airborne toxics control measure (ATCM) to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, including hardwood plywood, particleboard, medium density fiberboard, and also furniture and other finished products made with these wood products (California Air Resources Board 2009). While this formaldehyde ATCM has resulted in reduced emissions from composite wood products sold in California, they do not preclude that homes built with composite wood products meeting the CARB ATCM will have indoor formaldehyde concentrations that are below cancer and non-cancer exposure guidelines. A follow up study to the California New Home Study (CNHS) was conducted in 2016-2018 (Chan et. al., 2019), and found that the median indoor formaldehyde in new homes built after 2009 with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor formaldehyde concentrations, with a median indoor concentrations of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb) as compared to a median of 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. Thus, while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 38% lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer risk, the median lifetime cancer risk is still 112 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood products, which is more than 11 times the OEHHA 10 in a million cancer risk threshold (OEHHA, 2017a). With respect to this project, the buildings in the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project in South San Francisco, CA consist of a hotel. The employees of the hotel are expected to experience significant indoor exposures (e.g., 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year). These exposures for employees are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences and hotels. 4 of 19 Because the hotel will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 22.4 µg/m3 (Chan et. al., 2019) Assuming that the hotel employees work 8 hours per day and inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the formaldehyde dose per work-day at the offices is 149 µg/day. Assuming that these employees work 5 days per week and 50 weeks per year for 45 years (start at age 20 and retire at age 65) the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 65.8 µg/day. This is 1.64 times the NSRL (OEHHA, 2017a) of 40 µg/day and represents a cancer risk of 16.4 per million, which exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. This impact should be analyzed in an environmental impact report (“EIR”), and the agency should impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce this impact. Several feasible mitigation measures are discussed below and these and other measures should be analyzed in an EIR. While measurements of the indoor concentrations of formaldehyde in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials (Chan et. al., 2018), indicate that indoor formaldehyde concentrations in buildings built with similar materials (e.g. hotels, residences, offices, warehouses, schools) will pose cancer risks in excess of the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million, a determination of the cancer risk that is specific to this project and the materials used to construct these buildings can and should be conducted prior to completion of the environmental review. Appendix A, Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations and the CARB Formaldehyde ATCM, provides analyses that show utilization of CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials will not ensure acceptable cancer risks with respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products. 5 of 19 The following describes a method that should be used prior to construction in the environmental review under CEQA, for determining whether the indoor concentrations resulting from the formaldehyde emissions of the specific building materials/furnishings selected for the building exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines. Such a design analyses can be used to identify those materials/furnishings prior to the completion of the City’s CEQA review and project approval, that have formaldehyde emission rates that contribute to indoor concentrations that exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, so that alternative lower emitting materials/furnishings may be selected and/or higher minimum outdoor air ventilation rates can be increased to achieve acceptable indoor concentrations and incorporated as mitigation measures for this project. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment. This formaldehyde emissions assessment should be used in the environmental review under CEQA to assess the indoor formaldehyde concentrations from the proposed loading of building materials/furnishings, the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate data for building materials/furnishings, and the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. This assessment allows the applicant (and the City) to determine before the conclusion of the environmental review process and the building materials/furnishings are specified, purchased, and installed if the total chemical emissions will exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, and if so, allow for changes in the selection of specific material/furnishings and/or the design minimum outdoor air ventilations rates such that cancer and non-cancer guidelines are not exceeded. 1.) Define Indoor Air Quality Zones. Divide the building into separate indoor air quality zones, (IAQ Zones). IAQ Zones are defined as areas of well-mixed air. Thus, each ventilation system with recirculating air is considered a single zone, and each room or group of rooms where air is not recirculated (e.g. 100% outdoor air) is considered a separate zone. For IAQ Zones with the same construction material/furnishings and design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. (e.g. hotel rooms, apartments, condominiums, etc.) the formaldehyde emission rates need only be assessed for a single IAQ Zone of that type. 6 of 19 2.) Calculate Material/Furnishing Loading. For each IAQ Zone, determine the building material and furnishing loadings (e.g., m2 of material/m2 floor area, units of furnishings/m2 floor area) from an inventory of all potential indoor formaldehyde sources, including flooring, ceiling tiles, furnishings, finishes, insulation, sealants, adhesives, and any products constructed with composite wood products containing urea-formaldehyde resins (e.g., plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard). 3.) Calculate the Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each building material, calculate the formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) from the product of the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/m2-h) and the area (m2) of material in the IAQ Zone, and from each furnishing (e.g. chairs, desks, etc.) from the unit-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/unit-h) and the number of units in the IAQ Zone. NOTE: As a result of the high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014), most manufacturers of building materials furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. Most manufacturers of building furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using ANSI/BIFMA M7.1 Standard Test Method for Determining VOC Emissions (BIFMA, 2018), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. CDPH, BIFMA, and other chemical emission rate testing programs, typically certify that a material or furnishing does not create indoor chemical concentrations in excess of the maximum concentrations permitted by their certification. For instance, the CDPH emission rate testing requires that the measured emission rates when input into an office, school, or residential model do not exceed one-half of the OEHHA Chronic Exposure Guidelines (OEHHA, 2017b) for the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017). These certifications themselves do not provide the actual area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (i.e., µg/m2-h) of the product, but rather provide data that the formaldehyde emission rates do not exceed the maximum rate allowed 7 of 19 for the certification. Thus for example, the data for a certification of a specific type of flooring may be used to calculate that the area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde is less than 31 µg/m2-h, but not the actual measured specific emission rate, which may be 3, 18, or 30 µg/m2-h. These area-specific emission rates determined from the product certifications of CDPH, BIFA, and other certification programs can be used as an initial estimate of the formaldehyde emission rate. If the actual area-specific emission rates of a building material or furnishing is needed (i.e. the initial emission rates estimates from the product certifications are higher than desired), then that data can be acquired by requesting from the manufacturer the complete chemical emission rate test report. For instance if the complete CDPH emission test report is requested for a CDHP certified product, that report will provide the actual area-specific emission rates for not only the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017), but also all of the cancer and reproductive/developmental chemicals listed in the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), all of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) in the California Air Resources Board Toxic Air Contamination List (CARB, 2011), and the 10 chemicals with the greatest emission rates. Alternatively, a sample of the building material or furnishing can be submitted to a chemical emission rate testing laboratory, such as Berkeley Analytical Laboratory (https://berkeleyanalytical.com), to measure the formaldehyde emission rate. 4.) Calculate the Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the total formaldehyde emission rate (i.e. µg/h) from the individual formaldehyde emission rates from each of the building material/furnishings as determined in Step 3. 5.) Calculate the Indoor Formaldehyde Concentration. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) from Equation 1 by dividing the total formaldehyde emission rates (i.e. µg/h) as determined in Step 4, by the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate (m3/h) for the IAQ Zone. 8 of 19 𝐶𝐶𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖= 𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑄𝑄𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 (Equation 1) where: Cin = indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) Etotal = total formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) into the IAQ Zone. Qoa = design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone (m3/h) The above Equation 1 is based upon mass balance theory, and is referenced in Section 3.10.2 “Calculation of Estimated Building Concentrations” of the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017). 6.) Calculate the Indoor Exposure Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Risks. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the cancer and non-cancer health risks from the indoor formaldehyde concentrations determined in Step 5 and as described in the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA, 2015). 7.) Mitigate Indoor Formaldehyde Exposures of exceeding the CEQA Cancer and/or Non- Cancer Health Risks. In each IAQ Zone, provide mitigation for any formaldehyde exposure risk as determined in Step 6, that exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million or the CEQA non-cancer Hazard Quotient of 1.0. Provide the source and/or ventilation mitigation required in all IAQ Zones to reduce the health risks of the chemical exposures below the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. Source mitigation for formaldehyde may include: 1.) reducing the amount materials and/or furnishings that emit formaldehyde 2.) substituting a different material with a lower area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde Ventilation mitigation for formaldehyde emitted from building materials and/or furnishings may include: 9 of 19 1.) increasing the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone. NOTE: Mitigating the formaldehyde emissions through use of less material/furnishings, or use of lower emitting materials/furnishings, is the preferred mitigation option, as mitigation with increased outdoor air ventilation increases initial and operating costs associated with the heating/cooling systems. Further, we are not asking that the builder to “speculate” on what and how much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Impact. Another important finding of the CNHS, was that the outdoor air ventilation rates in the homes were very low. Outdoor air ventilation is a very important factor influencing the indoor concentrations of air contaminants, as it is the primary removal mechanism of all indoor air generated air contaminants. Lower outdoor air exchange rates cause indoor generated air contaminants to accumulate to higher indoor air concentrations. Many homeowners rarely open their windows or doors for ventilation as a result of their concerns for security/safety, noise, dust, and odor concerns (Price, 2007). In the CNHS field study, 32% of the homes did not use their windows during the 24‐hour Test Day, and 15% of the homes did not use their windows during the entire preceding week. Most of the homes with no window usage were homes in the winter field session. Thus, a substantial percentage of homeowners never open their windows, especially in the winter season. The median 24‐hour measurement was 0.26 ach, with a range of 0.09 ach to 5.3 ach. A total of 67% of the homes had outdoor air exchange rates below the minimum California Building Code (2001) requirement of 0.35 ach. Thus, the relatively tight envelope construction, combined with the fact that many people never open their windows for 10 of 19 ventilation, results in homes with low outdoor air exchange rates and higher indoor air contaminant concentrations. The 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project – South San Francisco, CA is close to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g. El Camino Real, A Street, 1st Street, 2nd Street, etc.) as well as flight paths from San Francisco International Airport. As a result of the outdoor vehicle traffic and air traffic noise, the Project site is likely to be a sound impacted site. The noise analyses provided in the Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration – 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project (City of South San Francisco, 2020), reports in Table 13 “Noise Monitoring Results”, noise levels ranging from 63.4 to 66.2 dBA Leq. However, these noise monitoring results consist of just two 15 minute sets of measurements collected at two locations on September 4, 2019 between 10:07 AM and 10:45 AM. To accurately assess the existing noise levels 24-hour measurements are needed on all four sides of the project. In addition, these noise measurements need to be adjusted to assess the impact of future traffic volumes with the Project. As a result of the high outdoor noise levels, the current project will require the need for mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation air to allow for a habitable interior environment with closed windows and doors. Such a ventilation system would allow windows and doors to be kept closed at the occupant’s discretion to control exterior noise within building interiors. PM2.5 Outdoor Concentrations Impact. An additional impact of the nearby motor vehicle traffic associated with this project, are the outdoor concentrations of PM2.5. According to the Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration – 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project (City of South Sand Francisco, 2020.), this Project is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which is a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5. An air quality analyses should to be conducted to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in the outdoor and indoor air that people inhale each day. This air quality analyses needs to consider the cumulative impacts of the project related emissions, existing and projected future emissions from local PM2.5 sources (e.g. stationary sources, motor vehicles, and 11 of 19 airport traffic) upon the outdoor air concentrations at the project site. If the outdoor concentrations are determined to exceed the California and National annual average PM2.5 exceedence concentration of 12 µg/m3, or the National 24-hour average exceedence concentration of 35 µg/m3, then the buildings need to have a mechanical supply of outdoor air that has air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles is less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. It is my experience that based on the projected high traffic noise levels, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 will exceed the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards and warrant installation of high efficiency air filters (i.e. MERV 13 or higher) in all mechanically supplied outdoor air ventilation systems. Indoor Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures The following are recommended mitigation measures to minimize the impacts upon indoor quality: - indoor formaldehyde concentrations - outdoor air ventilation - PM2.5 outdoor air concentrations Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Mitigation. Use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or ultra- low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins (CARB, 2009). Other projects such as the AC by Marriott Hotel – West San Jose Project (Asset Gas SC Inc.) and 2525 North Main Street, Santa Ana (AC 2525 Main LLC, 2019) have entered into settlement agreements stipulating the use of composite wood materials only containing NAF or ULEF resins. Alternatively, conduct the previously described Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Chemical Emissions Assessment, to determine that the combination of 12 of 19 formaldehyde emissions from building materials and furnishings do not create indoor formaldehyde concentrations that exceed the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks. It is important to note that we are not asking that the builder to “speculate” on what and how much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Outdoor Air Ventilation Mitigation. Provide each habitable room with a continuous mechanical supply of outdoor air that meets or exceeds the California 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (California Energy Commission, 2015) requirements of the greater of 15 cfm/occupant or 0.15 cfm/ft2 of floor area. Following installation of the system conduct testing and balancing to insure that required amount of outdoor air is entering each habitable room and provide a written report documenting the outdoor airflow rates. Do not use exhaust only mechanical outdoor air systems, use only balanced outdoor air supply and exhaust systems or outdoor air supply only systems. Provide a manual for the occupants or maintenance personnel, that describes the purpose of the mechanical outdoor air system and the operation and maintenance requirements of the system. PM2.5 Outdoor Air Concentration Mitigation. Install air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency (e.g. MERV 13 or higher) to filter the outdoor air entering the mechanical outdoor air supply systems, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles are less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. Install the air filters in the system such that they are accessible for replacement by the occupants or maintenance personnel. Include in the mechanical outdoor air ventilation system manual instructions on how to replace the air filters and the estimated frequency of replacement. 13 of 19 References AC 2525 Main LLC. 2019. Environmental Settlement Agreement with Laborers’ International Union of North America Local 652. Asset Gas SC. Inc. 2019. Settlement Agreement and Release with Jose Mexicano, Alejandro Martinez, and Laborers’ International Union of North America Local 652. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, San Francisco, CA. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and- research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en BIFA. 2018. BIFMA Product Safety and Performance Standards and Guidelines. www.bifma.org/page/standardsoverview California Air Resources Board. 2009. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Reduce Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/fro-final.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm California Building Code. 2001. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2 Volume 1, Appendix Chapter 12, Interior Environment, Division 1, Ventilation, Section 1207: 2001 California Building Code, California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento, CA. 14 of 19 California Building Standards Commission (2014). 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx. California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2007-033. Final Report, ARB Contract 03-326. Available at: www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/03-326.pdf. California Energy Commission, 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037- CMF.pdf CDPH. 2017. Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1. California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx. Chan, W., Kim, Y., Singer, B., and Walker I. 2019. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New California Homes with Gas Appliances and Mechanical Ventilation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Energy Technologies Area, LBNL-2001200, DOI: 10.20357/B7QC7X. City of South San Francisco. 2020. Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration – 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project. EPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, Chapter 16 – Activity Factors. Report EPA/600/R-09/052F, September 2011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Hodgson, A. T., D. Beal, J.E.R. McIlvaine. 2002. Sources of formaldehyde, other aldehydes and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 12: 235–242. 15 of 19 OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2017a. Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels. No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. Available at: http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/safeharbor081513.pdf OEHHA - Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2017b. All OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html Offermann, F. J. 2009. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes. California Air Resources Board and California Energy Commission, PIER Energy‐Related Environmental Research Program. Collaborative Report. CEC-500-2009-085. https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/04-310.pdf Offermann, F. J. and A. T. Hodgson. 2011. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes. Proceedings Indoor Air 2011 (12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011), June 5-10, 2011, Austin, TX USA. Price, Phillip P., Max Sherman, Robert H. Lee, and Thomas Piazza. 2007. Study of Ventilation Practices and Household Characteristics in New California Homes. USGBC. 2014. LEED BD+C Homes v4. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C. http://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4 16 of 19 APPENDIX A INDOOR FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS AND THE CARB FORMALDEHYDE ATCM With respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, the CARB ATCM regulations of formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, do not assure healthful indoor air quality. The following is the stated purpose of the CARB ATCM regulation - The purpose of this airborne toxic control measure is to “reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, and finished goods that contain composite wood products, that are sold, offered for sale, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California”. In other words, the CARB ATCM regulations do not “assure healthful indoor air quality”, but rather “reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products”. Just how much protection do the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products ? Definitely some, but certainly the regulations do not “assure healthful indoor air quality” when CARB Phase 2 products are utilized. As shown in the Chan 2019 study of new California homes, the median indoor formaldehyde concentration was of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb), which corresponds to a cancer risk of 112 per million for occupants with continuous exposure, which is more than 11 times the Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Another way of looking at how much protection the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products is to calculate the maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. For this calculation I utilized the floor area (2,272 ft2), the ceiling height (8.5 ft), and the number of bedrooms (4) as defined in Appendix B (New Single-Family Residence Scenario) of the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1, 2017, California Department of Public Health, 17 of 19 Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx. For the outdoor air ventilation rate I used the 2019 Title 24 code required mechanical ventilation rate (ASHRAE 62.2) of 106 cfm (180 m3/h) calculated for this model residence. For the composite wood formaldehyde emission rates I used the CARB ATCM Phase 2 rates. The calculated maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence, without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) – 15 ft2 (0.7% of the floor area), or Particle Board – 30 ft2 (1.3% of the floor area), or Hardwood Plywood – 119 ft2 (5.3% of the floor area), or Thin MDF – 46 ft2 (2.0 % of the floor area). For offices and hotels the calculated maximum amount of composite wood product (% of floor area) that can be used without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants, assuming 8 hours/day occupancy, and the California Mechanical Code minimum outdoor air ventilation rates are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products. Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) – 3.6 % (offices) and 4.6% (hotel rooms), or Particle Board – 7.2 % (offices) and 9.4% (hotel rooms), or Hardwood Plywood – 29 % (offices) and 37% (hotel rooms), or Thin MDF – 11 % (offices) and 14 % (hotel rooms) Clearly the CARB ATCM does not regulate the formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products such that the potentially large areas of these products, such as for flooring, baseboards, interior doors, window and door trims, and kitchen and bathroom cabinetry, could be used without causing indoor formaldehyde concentrations that result in CEQA 18 of 19 cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy. If CARB Phase 2 compliant composite wood products are utilized in construction, then the resulting indoor formaldehyde concentrations should be determined in the design phase using the specific amounts of each type of composite wood product, the specific formaldehyde emission rates, and the volume and outdoor air ventilation rates of the indoor spaces, and all feasible mitigation measures employed to reduce this impact (e.g. use less formaldehyde containing composite wood products and/or incorporate mechanical systems capable of higher outdoor air ventilation rates). See the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde. Alternatively, and perhaps a simpler approach, is to use only composite wood products (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or ultra- low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins. These products are now readily available and many other projects such as the AC by Marriott Hotel – West San Jose Project and 2525 North Main Street, Santa Ana have entered into settlement agreements stipulating the use of composite wood materials only containing NAF or ULEF resins. Francis (Bud) J. Offermann III PE, CIH Indoor Environmental Engineering 1448 Pine Street, Suite 103, San Francisco, CA 94109 Phone: 415-567-7700 Email: Offermann@iee-sf.com http://www.iee-sf.com Education M.S. Mechanical Engineering (1985) Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Graduate Studies in Air Pollution Monitoring and Control (1980) University of California, Berkeley, CA. B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (1976) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y. Professional Experience President: Indoor Environmental Engineering, San Francisco, CA. December, 1981 - present. Direct team of environmental scientists, chemists, and mechanical engineers in conducting State and Federal research regarding indoor air quality instrumentation development, building air quality field studies, ventilation and air cleaning performance measurements, and chemical emission rate testing. Provide design side input to architects regarding selection of building materials and ventilation system components to ensure a high quality indoor environment. Direct Indoor Air Quality Consulting Team for the winning design proposal for the new State of Washington Ecology Department building. Develop a full-scale ventilation test facility for measuring the performance of air diffusers; ASHRAE 129, Air Change Effectiveness, and ASHRAE 113, Air Diffusion Performance Index. Develop a chemical emission rate testing laboratory for measuring the chemical emissions from building materials, furnishings, and equipment. Principle Investigator of the California New Homes Study (2005-2007). Measured ventilation and indoor air quality in 108 new single family detached homes in northern and southern California. Develop and teach IAQ professional development workshops to building owners, managers, hygienists, and engineers. 2 Air Pollution Engineer: Earth Metrics Inc., Burlingame, CA, October, 1985 to March, 1987. Responsible for development of an air pollution laboratory including installation a forced choice olfactometer, tracer gas electron capture chromatograph, and associated calibration facilities. Field team leader for studies of fugitive odor emissions from sewage treatment plants, entrainment of fume hood exhausts into computer chip fabrication rooms, and indoor air quality investigations. Staff Scientist: Building Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Program, Energy and Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. January, 1980 to August, 1984. Deputy project leader for the Control Techniques group; responsible for laboratory and field studies aimed at evaluating the performance of indoor air pollutant control strategies (i.e. ventilation, filtration, precipitation, absorption, adsorption, and source control). Coordinated field and laboratory studies of air-to-air heat exchangers including evaluation of thermal performance, ventilation efficiency, cross-stream contaminant transfer, and the effects of freezing/defrosting. Developed an in situ test protocol for evaluating the performance of air cleaning systems and introduced the concept of effective cleaning rate (ECR) also known as the Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR). Coordinated laboratory studies of portable and ducted air cleaning systems and their effect on indoor concentrations of respirable particles and radon progeny. Co-designed an automated instrument system for measuring residential ventilation rates and radon concentrations. Designed hardware and software for a multi-channel automated data acquisition system used to evaluate the performance of air-to-air heat transfer equipment. Assistant Chief Engineer: Alta Bates Hospital, Berkeley, CA, October, 1979 to January, 1980. Responsible for energy management projects involving installation of power factor correction capacitors on large inductive electrical devices and installation of steam meters on physical plant steam lines. Member of Local 39, International Union of Operating Engineers. Manufacturing Engineer: American Precision Industries, Buffalo, NY, October, 1977 to October, 1979. 3 Responsible for reorganizing the manufacturing procedures regarding production of shell and tube heat exchangers. Designed customized automatic assembly, welding, and testing equipment. Designed a large paint spray booth. Prepared economic studies justifying new equipment purchases. Safety Director. Project Engineer: Arcata Graphics, Buffalo, N.Y. June, 1976 to October, 1977. Responsible for the design and installation of a bulk ink storage and distribution system and high speed automatic counting and marking equipment. Also coordinated material handling studies which led to the purchase and installation of new equipment. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) • Chairman of SPC-145P, Standards Project Committee - Test Method for Assessing the Performance of Gas Phase Air Cleaning Equipment (1991-1992) • Member SPC-129P, Standards Project Committee - Test Method for Ventilation Effectiveness (1986-97) - Member of Drafting Committee • Member Environmental Health Committee (1992-1994, 1997-2001, 2007-2010) - Chairman of EHC Research Subcommittee - Member of Man Made Mineral Fiber Position Paper Subcommittee - Member of the IAQ Position Paper Committee - Member of the Legionella Position Paper Committee - Member of the Limiting Indoor Mold and Dampness in Buildings Position Paper Committee • Member SSPC-62, Standing Standards Project Committee - Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality (1992 to 2000) - Chairman of Source Control and Air Cleaning Subcommittee • Chairman of TC-4.10, Indoor Environmental Modeling (1988-92) - Member of Research Subcommittee • Chairman of TC-2.3, Gaseous Air Contaminants and Control Equipment (1989-92) - Member of Research Subcommittee American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) • D-22 Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres - Member of Indoor Air Quality Subcommittee • E-06 Performance of Building Constructions American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) • Bioaerosols Committee (2007-2013) 4 American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Cal-OSHA Indoor Air Quality Advisory Committee International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) • Co-Chairman of Task Force on HVAC Hygiene U. S. Green Building Council (USGBC) - Member of the IEQ Technical Advisory Group (2007-2009) - Member of the IAQ Performance Testing Work Group (2010-2012) Western Construction Consultants (WESTCON) PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS Licensed Professional Engineer - Mechanical Engineering Certified Industrial Hygienist - American Board of Industrial Hygienists SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA Biological Contamination, Diagnosis, and Mitigation, Indoor Air’90, Toronto, Canada, August, 1990. Models for Predicting Air Quality, Indoor Air’90, Toronto, Canada, August, 1990. Microbes in Building Materials and Systems, Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July, 1993. Microorganisms in Indoor Air Assessment and Evaluation of Health Effects and Probable Causes, Walnut Creek, CA, February 27, 1997. Controlling Microbial Moisture Problems in Buildings, Walnut Creek, CA, February 27, 1997. Scientific Advisory Committee, Roomvent 98, 6th International Conference on Air Distribution in Rooms, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June 14-17, 1998. Moisture and Mould, Indoor Air ’99, Edinburgh, Scotland, August, 1999. Ventilation Modeling and Simulation, Indoor Air ’99, Edinburgh, Scotland, August, 1999. Microbial Growth in Materials, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August, 2000. 5 Co-Chair, Bioaerosols X- Exposures in Residences, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, CA, July 2002. Healthy Indoor Environments, Anaheim, CA, April 2003. Chair, Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Multi-Family Homes, Indoor Air 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2008. Co-Chair, ISIAQ Task Force Workshop; HVAC Hygiene, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, CA, July 2002. Chair, ETS in Multi-Family Housing: Exposures, Controls, and Legalities Forum, Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009. Chair, Energy Conservation and IAQ in Residences Workshop, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June 6, 2011. Chair, Electronic Cigarettes: Chemical Emissions and Exposures Colloquium, Indoor Air 2016, Ghent, Belgium, July 4, 2016. SPECIAL CONSULTATION Provide consultation to the American Home Appliance Manufacturers on the development of a standard for testing portable air cleaners, AHAM Standard AC-1. Served as an expert witness and special consultant for the U.S. Federal Trade Commission regarding the performance claims found in advertisements of portable air cleaners and residential furnace filters. Conducted a forensic investigation for a San Mateo, CA pro se defendant, regarding an alleged homicide where the victim was kidnapped in a steamer trunk. Determined the air exchange rate in the steamer trunk and how long the person could survive. Conducted in situ measurement of human exposure to toluene fumes released during nailpolish application for a plaintiffs attorney pursuing a California Proposition 65 product labeling case. June, 1993. Conducted a forensic in situ investigation for the Butte County, CA Sheriff’s Department of the emissions of a portable heater used in the bedroom of two twin one year old girls who suffered simultaneous crib death. Consult with OSHA on the 1995 proposed new regulation regarding indoor air quality and environmental tobacco smoke. 6 Consult with EPA on the proposed Building Alliance program and with OSHA on the proposed new OSHA IAQ regulation. Johnson Controls Audit/Certification Expert Review; Milwaukee, WI. May 28-29, 1997. Winner of the nationally published 1999 Request for Proposals by the State of Washington to conduct a comprehensive indoor air quality investigation of the Washington State Department of Ecology building in Lacey, WA. Selected by the State of California Attorney General’s Office in August, 2000 to conduct a comprehensive indoor air quality investigation of the Tulare County Court House. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory IAQ Experts Workshop: “Cause and Prevention of Sick Building Problems in Offices: The Experience of Indoor Environmental Quality Investigators”, Berkeley, California, May 26-27, 2004. Provide consultation and chemical emission rate testing to the State of California Attorney General’s Office in 2013-2015 regarding the chemical emissions from e- cigarettes. PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS : F.J.Offermann, C.D.Hollowell, and G.D.Roseme, "Low-Infiltration Housing in Rochester, New York: A Study of Air Exchange Rates and Indoor Air Quality," Environment International, 8, pp. 435-445, 1982. W.W.Nazaroff, F.J.Offermann, and A.W.Robb, "Automated System for Measuring Air Exchange Rate and Radon Concentration in Houses," Health Physics, 45, pp. 525-537, 1983. F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, B.Pedersen, and K.L.Revzan, "Ventilation Efficiencies of Wall- or Window-Mounted Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers," ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 89-2B, pp 507-527, 1983. W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E Chant, D. Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.Pedersen, "Onset of Freezing in Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers," ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 91- 1B, 1984. W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E Chant, D. Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.Pedersen, "Performance of Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers During Operation with Freezing and Periodic Defrosts," ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 91-1B, 1984. F.J.Offermann, R.G.Sextro, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, W.W.Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, and K.L.Revzan, "Control of Respirable Particles with Portable Air Cleaners," Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 19, pp.1761-1771, 1985. 7 R.G.Sextro, F.J.Offermann, W.W.Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, K.L.Revzan, and J.Yater, "Evaluation of Indoor Control Devices and Their Effects on Radon Progeny Concentrations," Atmospheric Environment, 12, pp. 429-438, 1986. W.J. Fisk, R.K.Spencer, F.J.Offermann, R.K.Spencer, B.Pedersen, R.Sextro, "Indoor Air Quality Control Techniques," Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey, (1987). F.J.Offermann, "Ventilation Effectiveness and ADPI Measurements of a Forced Air Heating System," ASHRAE Transactions , Volume 94, Part 1, pp 694-704, 1988. F.J.Offermann and D. Int-Hout "Ventilation Effectiveness Measurements of Three Supply/Return Air Configurations," Environment International , Volume 15, pp 585-592 1989. F.J. Offermann, S.A. Loiselle, M.C. Quinlan, and M.S. Rogers, "A Study of Diesel Fume Entrainment in an Office Building," IAQ '89, The Human Equation: Health and Comfort, pp 179-183, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1989. R.G.Sextro and F.J.Offermann, "Reduction of Residential Indoor Particle and Radon Progeny Concentrations with Ducted Air Cleaning Systems," submitted to Indoor Air, 1990. S.A.Loiselle, A.T.Hodgson, and F.J.Offermann, "Development of An Indoor Air Sampler for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds", Indoor Air , Vol 2, pp 191-210, 1991. F.J.Offermann, S.A.Loiselle, A.T.Hodgson, L.A. Gundel, and J.M. Daisey, "A Pilot Study to Measure Indoor Concentrations and Emission Rates of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds", Indoor Air , Vol 4, pp 497-512, 1991. F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, R.G. Sextro, "Performance Comparisons of Six Different Air Cleaners Installed in a Residential Forced Air Ventilation System," IAQ'91, Healthy Buildings, pp 342-350, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA (1991). F.J. Offermann, J. Daisey, A. Hodgson, L. Gundell, and S. Loiselle, "Indoor Concentrations and Emission Rates of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds", Indoor Air, Vol 4, pp 497-512 (1992). F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, R.G. Sextro, "Performance of Air Cleaners Installed in a Residential Forced Air System," ASHRAE Journal, pp 51-57, July, 1992. F.J. Offermann and S. A. Loiselle, "Performance of an Air-Cleaning System in an Archival Book Storage Facility," IAQ'92, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1992. S.B. Hayward, K.S. Liu, L.E. Alevantis, K. Shah, S. Loiselle, F.J. Offermann, Y.L. Chang, L. Webber, “Effectiveness of Ventilation and Other Controls in Reducing Exposure to ETS in Office Buildings,” Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July 4-8, 1993. 8 F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, G. Ander, H. Lau, "Indoor Contaminant Emission Rates Before and After a Building Bake-out," IAQ'93, Operating and Maintaining Buildings for Health, Comfort, and Productivity, pp 157-163, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1993. L.E. Alevantis, Hayward, S.B., Shah, S.B., Loiselle, S., and Offermann, F.J. "Tracer Gas Techniques for Determination of the Effectiveness of Pollutant Removal From Local Sources," IAQ '93, Operating and Maintaining Buildings for Health, Comfort, and Productivity, pp 119-129, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1993. L.E. Alevantis, Liu, L.E., Hayward, S.B., Offermann, F.J., Shah, S.B., Leiserson, K. Tsao, E., and Huang, Y., "Effectiveness of Ventilation in 23 Designated Smoking Areas in California Buildings," IAQ '94, Engineering Indoor Environments, pp 167-181, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1994. L.E. Alevantis, Offermann, F.J., Loiselle, S., and Macher, J.M., “Pressure and Ventilation Requirements of Hospital Isolation Rooms for Tuberculosis (TB) Patients: Existing Guidelines in the United States and a Method for Measuring Room Leakage”, Ventilation and Indoor air quality in Hospitals, M. Maroni, editor, Kluwer Academic publishers, Netherlands, 1996. F.J. Offermann, M. A. Waz, A.T. Hodgson, and H.M. Ammann, "Chemical Emissions from a Hospital Operating Room Air Filter," IAQ'96, Paths to Better Building Environments, pp 95-99, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1996. F.J. Offermann, "Professional Malpractice and the Sick Building Investigator," IAQ'96, Paths to Better Building Environments, pp 132-136, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1996. F.J. Offermann, “Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness,” Indoor Air, Vol 1, pp.206-211, 1999. F. J. Offermann, A. T. Hodgson, and J. P. Robertson, “Contaminant Emission Rates from PVC Backed Carpet Tiles on Damp Concrete”, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000. K.S. Liu, L.E. Alevantis, and F.J. Offermann, “A Survey of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Controls in California Office Buildings”, Indoor Air, Vol 11, pp. 26-34, 2001. F.J. Offermann, R. Colfer, P. Radzinski, and J. Robertson, “Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in an Automobile”, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, California, July 2002. F. J. Offermann, J.P. Robertson, and T. Webster, “The Impact of Tracer Gas Mixing on Airflow Rate Measurements in Large Commercial Fan Systems”, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, California, July 2002. M. J. Mendell, T. Brennan, L. Hathon, J.D. Odom, F.J.Offermann, B.H. Turk, K.M. Wallingford, R.C. Diamond, W.J. Fisk, “Causes and prevention of Symptom Complaints 9 in Office Buildings: Distilling the Experience of Indoor Environmental Investigators”, submitted to Indoor Air 2005, Beijing, China, September 4-9, 2005. F.J. Offermann, “Ventilation and IAQ in New Homes With and Without Mechanical Outdoor Air Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009. F.J. Offermann, “ASHRAE 62.2 Intermittent Residential Ventilation: What’s It Good For, Intermittently Poor IAQ”, IAQVEC 2010, Syracuse, CA, April 21, 2010. F.J. Offermann and A.T. Hodgson, “Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June, 2011. P. Jenkins, R. Johnson, T. Phillips, and F. Offermann, “Chemical Concentrations in New California Homes and Garages”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June, 2011. W. J. Mills, B. J. Grigg, F. J. Offermann, B. E. Gustin, and N. E. Spingarm, “Toluene and Methyl Ethyl Ketone Exposure from a Commercially Available Contact Adhesive”, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 9:D95-D102 May, 2012. F. J. Offermann, R. Maddalena, J. C. Offermann, B. C. Singer, and H, Wilhelm, “The Impact of Ventilation on the Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in Residences”, HB 2012, Brisbane, AU, July, 2012. F. J. Offermann, A. T. Hodgson, P. L. Jenkins, R. D. Johnson, and T. J. Phillips, “Attached Garages as a Source of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes”, HB 2012, Brisbane, CA, July, 2012. R. Maddalena, N. Li, F. Offermann, and B. Singer, “Maximizing Information from Residential Measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds”, HB 2012, Brisbane, AU, July, 2012. W. Chen, A. Persily, A. Hodgson, F. Offermann, D. Poppendieck, and K. Kumagai, “Area-Specific Airflow Rates for Evaluating the Impacts of VOC emissions in U.S. Single-Family Homes”, Building and Environment, Vol. 71, 204-211, February, 2014. F. J. Offermann, A. Eagan A. C. Offermann, and L. J. Radonovich, “Infectious Disease Aerosol Exposures With and Without Surge Control Ventilation System Modifications”, Indoor Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014. F. J. Offermann, “Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive Exposures”, Building and Environment, Vol. 93, Part 1, 101-105, November, 2015. F. J. Offermann, “Formaldehyde Emission Rates From Lumber Liquidators Laminate Flooring Manufactured in China”, Indoor Air 2016, Belgium, Ghent, July, 2016. F. J. Offermann, “Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde Emission Rates for E-Cigarettes”, Indoor Air 2016, Belgium, Ghent, July, 2016. 10 OTHER REPORTS: W.J.Fisk, P.G.Cleary, and F.J.Offermann, "Energy Saving Ventilation with Residential Heat Exchangers," a Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory brochure distributed by the Bonneville Power Administration, 1981. F.J.Offermann, J.R.Girman, and C.D.Hollowell, "Midway House Tightening Project: A Study of Indoor Air Quality," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-12777, 1981. F.J.Offermann, J.B.Dickinson, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, C.D.Hollowell, D.L.Krinkle, and G.D.Roseme, "Residential Air-Leakage and Indoor Air Quality in Rochester, New York," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-13100, 1982. F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, B.Pedersen, and K.L.Revzan, Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers: A Study of the Ventilation Efficiencies of Wall- or Window- Mounted Units," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-14358, 1982. F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, W.W.Nazaroff, and R.G.Sextro, "A Review of Portable Air Cleaners for Controlling Indoor Concentrations of Particulates and Radon Progeny," An interim report for the Bonneville Power Administration, 1983. W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E.Chant, D.Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.S. Pedersen, "Freezing in Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers: An Experimental Study," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16783, 1983. R.G.Sextro, W.W.Nazaroff, F.J.Offermann, and K.L.Revzan, "Measurements of Indoor Aerosol Properties and Their Effect on Radon Progeny," Proceedings of the American Association of Aerosol Research Annual Meeting, April, 1983. F.J.Offermann, R.G.Sextro, W.J.Fisk, W.W. Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, K.L.Revzan, and J.Yater, "Control of Respirable Particles and Radon Progeny with Portable Air Cleaners," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16659, 1984. W.J.Fisk, R.K.Spencer, D.T.Grimsrud, F.J.Offermann, B.Pedersen, and R.G.Sextro, "Indoor Air Quality Control Techniques: A Critical Review," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16493, 1984. F.J.Offermann, J.R.Girman, and R.G.Sextro, "Controlling Indoor Air Pollution from Tobacco Smoke: Models and Measurements,", Indoor Air, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol 1, pp 257-264, Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm (1984), Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-17603, 1984. 11 R.Otto, J.Girman, F.Offermann, and R.Sextro,"A New Method for the Collection and Comparison of Respirable Particles in the Indoor Environment," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Special Director Fund's Study, 1984. A.T.Hodgson and F.J.Offermann, "Examination of a Sick Office Building," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, an informal field study, 1984. R.G.Sextro, F.J.Offermann, W.W.Nazaroff, and A.V.Nero, "Effects of Aerosol Concentrations on Radon Progeny," Aerosols, Science, & Technology, and Industrial Applications of Airborne Particles, editors B.Y.H.Liu, D.Y.H.Pui, and H.J.Fissan, p525, Elsevier, 1984. K.Sexton, S.Hayward, F.Offermann, R.Sextro, and L.Weber, "Characterization of Particulate and Organic Emissions from Major Indoor Sources, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Stockholm, Sweden, August 20-24, 1984. F.J.Offermann, "Tracer Gas Measurements of Laboratory Fume Entrainment at a Semi- Conductor Manufacturing Plant," an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1986. F.J.Offermann, "Tracer Gas Measurements of Ventilation Rates in a Large Office Building," an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1986. F.J.Offermann, "Measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds in a New Large Office Building with Adhesive Fastened Carpeting," an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1986. F.J.Offermann, "Designing and Operating Healthy Buildings", an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1986. F.J.Offermann, "Measurements and Mitigation of Indoor Spray-Applicated Pesticides", an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1988. F.J.Offermann and S. Loiselle, "Measurements and Mitigation of Indoor Mold Contamination in a Residence", an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1989. F.J.Offermann and S. Loiselle, "Performance Measurements of an Air Cleaning System in a Large Archival Library Storage Facility", an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1989. F.J. Offermann, J.M. Daisey, L.A. Gundel, and A.T. Hodgson, S. A. Loiselle, "Sampling, Analysis, and Data Validation of Indoor Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons", Final Report, Contract No. A732-106, California Air Resources Board, March, 1990. 12 L.A. Gundel, J.M. Daisey, and F.J. Offermann, "A Sampling and Analytical Method for Gas Phase Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Indoor Air '90, July 29-August 1990. A.T. Hodgson, J.M. Daisey, and F.J. Offermann "Development of an Indoor Sampling and Analytical Method for Particulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Indoor Air '90, July 29-August, 1990. F.J. Offermann, J.O. Sateri, “Tracer Gas Measurements in Large Multi-Room Buildings”, Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July 4-8, 1993. F.J.Offermann, M. T. O’Flaherty, and M. A. Waz “Validation of ASHRAE 129 - Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness”, Final Report of ASHRAE Research Project 891, December 8, 1997. S.E. Guffey, F.J. Offermann et. al., “Proceedings of the Workshop on Ventilation Engineering Controls for Environmental Tobacco smoke in the Hospitality Industry”, U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration and ACGIH, 1998. F.J. Offermann, R.J. Fiskum, D. Kosar, and D. Mudaari, “A Practical Guide to Ventilation Practices & Systems for Existing Buildings”, Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering supplement to April/May 1999 issue. F.J. Offermann, P. Pasanen, “Workshop 18: Criteria for Cleaning of Air Handling Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000. F.J. Offermann, Session Summaries: Building Investigations, and Design & Construction, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000. F.J. Offermann, “The IAQ Top 10”, Engineered Systems, November, 2008. L. Kincaid and F.J. Offermann, “Unintended Consequences: Formaldehyde Exposures in Green Homes, AIHA Synergist, February, 2010. F.J. Offermann, “ IAQ in Air Tight Homes”, ASHRAE Journal, November, 2010. F.J. Offermann, “The Hazards of E-Cigarettes”, ASHRAE Journal, June, 2014. PRESENTATIONS : "Low-Infiltration Housing in Rochester, New York: A Study of Air Exchange Rates and Indoor Air Quality," Presented at the International Symposium on Indoor Air Pollution, Health and Energy Conservation, Amherst, MA, October 13-16,1981. 13 "Ventilation Efficiencies of Wall- or Window-Mounted Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers," Presented at the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers Summer Meeting, Washington, DC, June, 1983. "Controlling Indoor Air Pollution from Tobacco Smoke: Models and Measurements," Presented at the Third International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Stockholm, Sweden, August 20-24, 1984. "Indoor Air Pollution: An Emerging Environmental Problem", Presented to the Association of Environmental Professionals, Bar Area/Coastal Region 1, Berkeley, CA, May 29, 1986. "Ventilation Measurement Techniques," Presented at the Workshop on Sampling and Analytical Techniques, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, September 26, 1986 and September 25, 1987. "Buildings That Make You Sick: Indoor Air Pollution", Presented to the Sacramento Association of Professional Energy Managers, Sacramento, CA, November 18, 1986. "Ventilation Effectiveness and Indoor Air Quality", Presented to the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers Northern Nevada Chapter, Reno, NV, February 18, 1987, Golden Gate Chapter, San Francisco, CA, October 1, 1987, and the San Jose Chapter, San Jose, CA, June 9, 1987. "Tracer Gas Techniques for Studying Ventilation," Presented at the Indoor Air Quality Symposium, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, September 22-24, 1987. "Indoor Air Quality Control: What Works, What Doesn't," Presented to the Sacramento Association of Professional Energy Managers, Sacramento, CA, November 17, 1987. "Ventilation Effectiveness and ADPI Measurements of a Forced Air Heating System," Presented at the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers Winter Meeting, Dallas, Texas, January 31, 1988. "Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation, and Energy in Commercial Buildings", Presented at the Building Owners &Managers Association of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, July 21, 1988. "Controlling Indoor Air Quality: The New ASHRAE Ventilation Standards and How to Evaluate Indoor Air Quality", Presented at a conference "Improving Energy Efficiency and Indoor Air Quality in Commercial Buildings," National Energy Management Institute, Reno, Nevada, November 4, 1988. "A Study of Diesel Fume Entrainment Into an Office Building," Presented at Indoor Air '89: The Human Equation: Health and Comfort, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, San Diego, CA, April 17-20, 1989. 14 "Indoor Air Quality in Commercial Office Buildings," Presented at the Renewable Energy Technologies Symposium and International Exposition, Santa Clara, CA June 20, 1989. "Building Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality", Presented to the San Joaquin Chapter of the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, September 7, 1989. "How to Meet New Ventilation Standards: Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency," a workshop presented by the Association of Energy Engineers; Chicago, IL, March 20-21, 1989; Atlanta, GA, May 25-26, 1989; San Francisco, CA, October 19-20, 1989; Orlando, FL, December 11-12, 1989; Houston, TX, January 29-30, 1990; Washington D.C., February 26-27, 1990; Anchorage, Alaska, March 23, 1990; Las Vegas, NV, April 23-24, 1990; Atlantic City, NJ, September 27-28, 1991; Anaheim, CA, November 19-20, 1991; Orlando, FL, February 28 - March 1, 1991; Washington, DC, March 20-21, 1991; Chicago, IL, May 16-17, 1991; Lake Tahoe, NV, August 15-16, 1991; Atlantic City, NJ, November 18-19, 1991; San Jose, CA, March 23-24, 1992. "Indoor Air Quality," a seminar presented by the Anchorage, Alaska Chapter of the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, March 23, 1990. "Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality", Presented at the 1990 HVAC & Building Systems Congress, Santa, Clara, CA, March 29, 1990. "Ventilation Standards for Office Buildings", Presented to the South Bay Property Managers Association, Santa Clara, May 9, 1990. "Indoor Air Quality", Presented at the Responsive Energy Technologies Symposium & International Exposition (RETSIE), Santa Clara, CA, June 20, 1990. "Indoor Air Quality - Management and Control Strategies", Presented at the Association of Energy Engineers, San Francisco Bay Area Chapter Meeting, Berkeley, CA, September 25, 1990. "Diagnosing Indoor Air Contaminant and Odor Problems", Presented at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, New York City, NY, January 23, 1991. "Diagnosing and Treating the Sick Building Syndrome", Presented at the Energy 2001, Oklahoma, OK, March 19, 1991. "Diagnosing and Mitigating Indoor Air Quality Problems" a workshop presented by the Association of Energy Engineers, Chicago, IL, October 29-30, 1990; New York, NY, January 24-25, 1991; Anaheim, April 25-26, 1991; Boston, MA, June 10-11, 1991; Atlanta, GA, October 24-25, 1991; Chicago, IL, October 3-4, 1991; Las Vegas, NV, December 16-17, 1991; Anaheim, CA, January 30-31, 1992; Atlanta, GA, March 5-6, 1992; Washington, DC, May 7-8, 1992; Chicago, IL, August 19-20, 1992; Las Vegas, 15 NV, October 1-2, 1992; New York City, NY, October 26-27, 1992, Las Vegas, NV, March 18-19, 1993; Lake Tahoe, CA, July 14-15, 1994; Las Vegas, NV, April 3-4, 1995; Lake Tahoe, CA, July 11-12, 1996; Miami, Fl, December 9-10, 1996. "Sick Building Syndrome and the Ventilation Engineer", Presented to the San Jose Engineers Club, May, 21, 1991. "Duct Cleaning: Who Needs It ? How Is It Done ? What Are The Costs ?" What Are the Risks ?, Moderator of Forum at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Indianapolis ID, June 23, 1991. "Operating Healthy Buildings", Association of Plant Engineers, Oakland, CA, November 14, 1991. "Duct Cleaning Perspectives", Moderator of Seminar at the ASHRAE Semi-Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, June 24, 1991. "Duct Cleaning: The Role of the Environmental Hygienist," ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, January 29, 1992. "Emerging IAQ Issues", Fifth National Conference on Indoor Air Pollution, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, April 13-14, 1992. "International Symposium on Room Air Convection and Ventilation Effectiveness", Member of Scientific Advisory Board, University of Tokyo, July 22-24, 1992. "Guidelines for Contaminant Control During Construction and Renovation Projects in Office Buildings," Seminar paper at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, January 26, 1993. "Outside Air Economizers: IAQ Friend or Foe", Moderator of Forum at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, January 26, 1993. "Orientation to Indoor Air Quality," an EPA two and one half day comprehensive indoor air quality introductory workshop for public officials and building property managers; Sacramento, September 28-30, 1992; San Francisco, February 23-24, 1993; Los Angeles, March 16-18, 1993; Burbank, June 23, 1993; Hawaii, August 24-25, 1993; Las Vegas, August 30, 1993; San Diego, September 13-14, 1993; Phoenix, October 18-19, 1993; Reno, November 14-16, 1995; Fullerton, December 3-4, 1996; Fresno, May 13-14, 1997. "Building Air Quality: A Guide for Building Owners and Facility Managers," an EPA one half day indoor air quality introductory workshop for building owners and facility managers. Presented throughout Region IX 1993-1995. “Techniques for Airborne Disease Control”, EPRI Healthcare Initiative Symposium; San Francisco, CA; June 7, 1994. 16 “Diagnosing and Mitigating Indoor Air Quality Problems”, CIHC Conference; San Francisco, September 29, 1994. ”Indoor Air Quality: Tools for Schools,” an EPA one day air quality management workshop for school officials, teachers, and maintenance personnel; San Francisco, October 18-20, 1994; Cerritos, December 5, 1996; Fresno, February 26, 1997; San Jose, March 27, 1997; Riverside, March 5, 1997; San Diego, March 6, 1997; Fullerton, November 13, 1997; Santa Rosa, February 1998; Cerritos, February 26, 1998; Santa Rosa, March 2, 1998. ASHRAE 62 Standard “Ventilation for Acceptable IAQ”, ASCR Convention; San Francisco, CA, March 16, 1995. “New Developments in Indoor Air Quality: Protocol for Diagnosing IAQ Problems”, AIHA-NC; March 25, 1995. "Experimental Validation of ASHRAE SPC 129, Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness", 16th AIVC Conference, Palm Springs, USA, September 19-22, 1995. “Diagnostic Protocols for Building IAQ Assessment”, American Society of Safety Engineers Seminar: ‘Indoor Air Quality – The Next Door’; San Jose Chapter, September 27, 1995; Oakland Chapter, 9, 1997. “Diagnostic Protocols for Building IAQ Assessment”, Local 39; Oakland, CA, October 3, 1995. “Diagnostic Protocols for Solving IAQ Problems”, CSU-PPD Conference; October 24, 1995. “Demonstrating Compliance with ASHRAE 62-1989 Ventilation Requirements”, AIHA; October 25, 1995. “IAQ Diagnostics: Hands on Assessment of Building Ventilation and Pollutant Transport”, EPA Region IX; Phoenix, AZ, March 12, 1996; San Francisco, CA, April 9, 1996; Burbank, CA, April 12, 1996. “Experimental Validation of ASHRAE 129P: Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness”, Room Vent ‘96 / International Symposium on Room Air Convection and Ventilation Effectiveness"; Yokohama, Japan, July 16-19, 1996. “IAQ Diagnostic Methodologies and RFP Development”, CCEHSA 1996 Annual Conference, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, August 2, 1996. “The Practical Side of Indoor Air Quality Assessments”, California Industrial Hygiene Conference ‘96, San Diego, CA, September 2, 1996. 17 “ASHRAE Standard 62: Improving Indoor Environments”, Pacific Gas and Electric Energy Center, San Francisco, CA, October 29, 1996. “Operating and Maintaining Healthy Buildings”, April 3-4, 1996, San Jose, CA; July 30, 1997, Monterey, CA. “IAQ Primer”, Local 39, April 16, 1997; Amdahl Corporation, June 9, 1997; State Compensation Insurance Fund’s Safety & Health Services Department, November 21, 1996. “Tracer Gas Techniques for Measuring Building Air Flow Rates”, ASHRAE, Philadelphia, PA, January 26, 1997. “How to Diagnose and Mitigate Indoor Air Quality Problems”; Women in Waste; March 19, 1997. “Environmental Engineer: What Is It?”, Monte Vista High School Career Day; April 10, 1997. “Indoor Environment Controls: What’s Hot and What’s Not”, Shaklee Corporation; San Francisco, CA, July 15, 1997. “Measurement of Ventilation System Performance Parameters in the US EPA BASE Study”, Healthy Buildings/IAQ’97, Washington, DC, September 29, 1997. “Operations and Maintenance for Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments”, PASMA; October 7, 1997. “Designing for Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments”, Construction Specification Institute, Santa Rosa, CA, November 6, 1997. “Ventilation System Design for Good IAQ”, University of Tulsa 10th Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, February 25, 1998. “The Building Shell”, Tools For Building Green Conference and Trade Show, Alameda County Waste Management Authority and Recycling Board, Oakland, CA, February 28, 1998. “Identifying Fungal Contamination Problems In Buildings”, The City of Oakland Municipal Employees, Oakland, CA, March 26, 1998. “Managing Indoor Air Quality in Schools: Staying Out of Trouble”, CASBO, Sacramento, CA, April 20, 1998. “Indoor Air Quality”, CSOOC Spring Conference, Visalia, CA, April 30, 1998. “Particulate and Gas Phase Air Filtration”, ACGIH/OSHA, Ft. Mitchell, KY, June 1998. 18 “Building Air Quality Facts and Myths”, The City of Oakland / Alameda County Safety Seminar, Oakland, CA, June 12, 1998. “Building Engineering and Moisture”, Building Contamination Workshop, University of California Berkeley, Continuing Education in Engineering and Environmental Management, San Francisco, CA, October 21-22, 1999. “Identifying and Mitigating Mold Contamination in Buildings”, Western Construction Consultants Association, Oakland, CA, March 15, 2000; AIG Construction Defect Seminar, Walnut Creek, CA, May 2, 2001; City of Oakland Public Works Agency, Oakland, CA, July 24, 2001; Executive Council of Homeowners, Alamo, CA, August 3, 2001. “Using the EPA BASE Study for IAQ Investigation / Communication”, Joint Professional Symposium 2000, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Orange County & Southern California Sections, Long Beach, October 19, 2000. “Ventilation,” Indoor Air Quality: Risk Reduction in the 21st Century Symposium, sponsored by the California Environmental Protection Agency/Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, May 3-4, 2000. “Workshop 18: Criteria for Cleaning of Air Handling Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000. “Closing Session Summary: ‘Building Investigations’ and ‘Building Design & Construction’, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000. “Managing Building Air Quality and Energy Efficiency, Meeting the Standard of Care”, BOMA, MidAtlantic Environmental Hygiene Resource Center, Seattle, WA, May 23rd, 2000; San Antonio, TX, September 26-27, 2000. “Diagnostics & Mitigation in Sick Buildings: When Good Buildings Go Bad,” University of California Berkeley, September 18, 2001. “Mold Contamination: Recognition and What To Do and Not Do”, Redwood Empire Remodelers Association; Santa Rosa, CA, April 16, 2002. “Investigative Tools of the IAQ Trade”, Healthy Indoor Environments 2002; Austin, TX; April 22, 2002. “Finding Hidden Mold: Case Studies in IAQ Investigations”, AIHA Northern California Professionals Symposium; Oakland, CA, May 8, 2002. “Assessing and Mitigating Fungal Contamination in Buildings”, Cal/OSHA Training; Oakland, CA, February 14, 2003 and West Covina, CA, February 20-21, 2003. 19 “Use of External Containments During Fungal Mitigation”, Invited Speaker, ACGIH Mold Remediation Symposium, Orlando, FL, November 3-5, 2003. Building Operator Certification (BOC), 106-IAQ Training Workshops, Northwest Energy Efficiency Council; Stockton, CA, December 3, 2003; San Francisco, CA, December 9, 2003; Irvine, CA, January 13, 2004; San Diego, January 14, 2004; Irwindale, CA, January 27, 2004; Downey, CA, January 28, 2004; Santa Monica, CA, March 16, 2004; Ontario, CA, March 17, 2004; Ontario, CA, November 9, 2004, San Diego, CA, November 10, 2004; San Francisco, CA, November 17, 2004; San Jose, CA, November 18, 2004; Sacramento, CA, March 15, 2005. “Mold Remediation: The National QUEST for Uniformity Symposium”, Invited Speaker, Orlando, Florida, November 3-5, 2003. “Mold and Moisture Control”, Indoor Air Quality workshop for The Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS), San Francisco, December 11, 2003. “Advanced Perspectives In Mold Prevention & Control Symposium”, Invited Speaker, Las Vegas, Nevada, November 7-9, 2004. “Building Sciences: Understanding and Controlling Moisture in Buildings”, American Industrial Hygiene Association, San Francisco, CA, February 14-16, 2005. “Indoor Air Quality Diagnostics and Healthy Building Design”, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, March 2, 2005. “Improving IAQ = Reduced Tenant Complaints”, Northern California Facilities Exposition, Santa Clara, CA, September 27, 2007. “Defining Safe Building Air”, Criteria for Safe Air and Water in Buildings, ASHRAE Winter Meeting, Chicago, IL, January 27, 2008. “Update on USGBC LEED and Air Filtration”, Invited Speaker, NAFA 2008 Convention, San Francisco, CA, September 19, 2008. “Ventilation and Indoor air Quality in New California Homes”, National Center of Healthy Housing, October 20, 2008. “Indoor Air Quality in New Homes”, California Energy and Air Quality Conference, October 29, 2008. “Mechanical Outdoor air Ventilation Systems and IAQ in New Homes”, ACI Home Performance Conference, Kansas City, MO, April 29, 2009. “Ventilation and IAQ in New Homes with and without Mechanical Outdoor Air Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009. 20 “Ten Ways to Improve Your Air Quality”, Northern California Facilities Exposition, Santa Clara, CA, September 30, 2009. “New Developments in Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings”, Westcon meeting, Alameda, CA, March 17, 2010. “Intermittent Residential Mechanical Outdoor Air Ventilation Systems and IAQ”, ASHRAE SSPC 62.2 Meeting, Austin, TX, April 19, 2010. “Measured IAQ in Homes”, ACI Home Performance Conference, Austin, TX, April 21, 2010. “Respiration: IEQ and Ventilation”, AIHce 2010, How IH Can LEED in Green buildings, Denver, CO, May 23, 2010. “IAQ Considerations for Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB)”, Northern California Facilities Exposition, Santa Clara, CA, September 22, 2010. “Energy Conservation and Health in Buildings”, Berkeley High SchoolGreen Career Week, Berkeley, CA, April 12, 2011. “What Pollutants are Really There ?”, ACI Home Performance Conference, San Francisco, CA, March 30, 2011. “Energy Conservation and Health in Residences Workshop”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June 6, 2011. “Assessing IAQ and Improving Health in Residences”, US EPA Weatherization Plus Health, September 7, 2011. “Ventilation: What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been”, Westcon, May 21, 2014. “Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive Exposures”, Indoor Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014. “Infectious Disease Aerosol Exposures With and Without Surge Control Ventilation System Modifications”, Indoor Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014. “Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes”, IMF Health and Welfare Fair, Washington, DC, February 18, 2015. “Chemical Emissions and Health Hazards Associated with E-Cigarettes”, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, August 15, 2014. “Formaldehyde Indoor Concentrations, Material Emission Rates, and the CARB ATCM”, Harris Martin’s Lumber Liquidators Flooring Litigation Conference, WQ Minneapolis Hotel, May 27, 2015. 21 “Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive Exposure”, FDA Public Workshop: Electronic Cigarettes and the Public Health, Hyattsville, MD June 2, 2015. “Creating Healthy Homes, Schools, and Workplaces”, Chautauqua Institution, Athenaeum Hotel, August 24, 2015. “Diagnosing IAQ Problems and Designing Healthy Buildings”, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, October 6, 2015. “Diagnosing Ventilation and IAQ Problems in Commercial Buildings”, BEST Center Annual Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, January 6, 2016. “A Review of Studies of Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes and Impacts of Environmental Factors on Formaldehyde Emission Rates From Composite Wood Products”, AIHce2016, May, 21-26, 2016. “Admissibility of Scientific Testimony”, Science in the Court, Proposition 65 Clearinghouse Annual Conference, Oakland, CA, September 15, 2016. “Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation”, ASHRAE Redwood Empire, Napa, CA, December 1, 2016.     EXHIBIT B  13 May 2020 WI No. 20-045 Rebecca L. Davis, Esq. Lozeau Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94612 Subject: 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2020 Review and Comment on Noise Analysis Dear Ms. Davis, Per your request, Wilson Ihrig has reviewed the following document: C40 El Camino Real Hotel Project, Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”, April 2020) In this letter, we offer comments on the noise impact analysis of the IS/MND. We find the analysis to be flawed for multiple reasons which results in an inappropriate conclusion that construction noise impacts will be less than significant. As will be developed in detail below, a proper analysis using data provided in the IS/MND, the noise model utilized by the IS/MND, and the City of South San Francisco (CSSF) Municipal Code results in a determination that the noise impact will be significant. In addition, an analysis of the increase in local noise levels during construction – something not done in the IS/MND – also indicates that the noise impact will be significant. Wilson Ihrig has practiced exclusively in the field of acoustics since 1966. During our 54 years of operation, we have prepared hundreds of noise studies for Environmental Impact Reports and Statements. We have one of the largest technical laboratories in the acoustical consulting industry. We also utilize industry-standard acoustical programs such as Environmental Noise Model (ENM), Traffic Noise Model (TNM), SoundPLAN, and CADNA. In short, we are well qualified to prepare environmental noise studies and review studies prepared by others. 1. Construction Noise Analysis Flawed Leading to Incorrect Assessment The construction noise analysis is presented in Section 4.13 of the IS/MND. The analysis is conducted using a model promulgated by the Federal Highway Administration called the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). This is a commonly used model and appropriate for this purpose. The construction noise analysis analyzes the noise levels at two receptors, (i) the neighboring All Season 840 El Camino Real Hotel IS/MND Review and Comment on Noise Analysis 2 Lodge south of the project site and (ii) the nearest private residences east of the project site. The analysis is based upon the closest distance from the “anticipated edge of the construction site” to the buildings, stated to be 20 feet and 70 feet, respectively, to the hotel and the homes. [IS/MND at p. 101] The results of the RCNM calculations are presented in Table 15 of the IS/MND [at p. 102], and because all of the reported levels are less than 90 dBA, the impact from construction noise is found to be less than significant. We find this analysis to be flawed in two respects. The noise regulation that the IS/MND utilizes for the threshold of significance is Section 8.32.050(d)(2): The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed ninety dB. This regulation does not specify which noise descriptor is subject 90 dBA limit.1 Appendix NOI includes RCNM calculations of both maximum and average noise levels. The numbers relied upon in the body of the IS/MND, and included in Table 15, are the average noise levels rather than the maximum noise levels.2 This is inconsistent with the noise ordinance, which does not limit the average noise level, but rather prohibits any noise above 90 dBA. The IS/MND itself relies upon average noise levels for its analysis as presented in Table 15. [IS/MND at p. 102] Thus, the IS/MND is flawed in that it misinterprets the CSSF Municipal Code. A second flaw associated with the application of the CSSF Municipal Code is that the IS/MND calculation is made at the distance to various building façades rather than to the relevant property planes, even though the Municipal Code plainly states that the point of assessment is to be “any point outside of the property plane of the project”. In the case of the private residences on A Street, the IS/MND uses a distance of 70 feet, however, the site plan in the IS/MND clearly shows that the proposed hotel will be only 15 feet from the property plane. [ISMND Figure 3 at p. 8] The RCNM formula for calculating the maximum noise level from a single piece of equipment at distance D is Lmax(D) = Lmax,reference(50ft) + 20log10(50ft/D) D = distance in feet 1 Section 8.32.020, Definitions, Subsection (a) of the SSF Municipal Code establishes that “All references to dB in this chapter utilize the A-level weighting scale.” Decibels so weighted are designated by international standards as “dBA”. 2 Despite the statement on page 101 that “Table 15 shows the maximum expected construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptor . . .”, the data in Table 15 are actually the average construction noise levels (“Leq”), not the maximum levels (“Lmax”). The denotation “Leq” comes from the fact that the steady sound level that has the same amount of energy as the time-varying levels of the measurement period is called the equivalent level. Technically, this is the energy-averaged noise level, but, for all intents and purposes, it may simply be thought of as the average noise level. 840 El Camino Real Hotel IS/MND Review and Comment on Noise Analysis 3 For example, as the RCNM data sheet for the Demolition phase (IS/MND, Appendix NOI) shows, the maximum noise level for an Excavator at 20 ft is Lmax(20ft) = 80.7 dBA + 20log10(50ft/20ft) = 88.7 dBA 3 If this same calculation is made at the distance from the proposed hotel to the residential property plane, 15 feet, the maximum noise level is calculated to be Lmax(15ft) = 80.7 dBA + 20log10(50ft/15/ft) = 91.2 dBA The maximum noise level during any phase of construction is determined by the single loudest piece of equipment. Following are the maximum noise levels for each phase of construction calculated using information taken directly from the IS/MND and the 15-foot distance from the proposed hotel building to the property plane: Phase Loudest Equipment Max Level at 50 ft Max Level at 15 ft Demolition Excavator 80.7 dBA 91.2 dBA Grading Compactor (ground) 83.2 dBA 93.7 dBA Site Prep Compactor (ground) 83.2 dBA 93.7 dBA Construction Crane & Generator 80.6 dBA 91.1 dBA Paving Paver 77.2 dBA 87.7 dBA As can be seen, the maximum noise level will exceed the CSSF Municipal Code limit at the residential property plane for all but the last phase of construction. Because 90 dBA limit at the property plane is the adopted threshold of significance, construction noise should identified as a significant noise impact. 2. Construction Noise Analysis Failed to Assess Increase in Ambient Noise Levels A CEQA noise analysis is supposed to assess whether a project would generate a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project. This is not done in the IS/MND, however, there is sufficient information in the IS/MND for me to do a cursory analysis here. The preparers of the IS/MND made noise measurements at the “Back of project site, adjacent to the back of A Street Residences.” The equivalent (average) noise level was 63.4 dBA Leq, and the primary noise source was noted as “Traffic on El Camino Real”. [IS/MND Table 13 at p. 97] Careful study of Street View photographs in Google Maps shows that the project site elevation is higher than the residential backyards because it is built up behind a retaining wall. The elevation data in Google 3 This calculation was done for the All Season Lodge which the IS/MND states is 20 feet from the nearest construction. 840 El Camino Real Hotel IS/MND Review and Comment on Noise Analysis 4 Earth indicates that the retaining wall is about 10 ft tall, and this accords with the Street View photos of the retaining wall taken from A Street. Because there is a large, sharp change in elevation between the project site and the residential backyard, the traffic noise from El Camino Real is shielded by what is effectively an 8-foot sound barrier wall (see sketch below). It is reasonable to assume that the difference is 5 dB, the minimal amount for a wall that breaks the line-of-sight between a noise source and a receiver by a few feet. With the inclusion of the 5 dB noise reduction associated with the elevation change, a reasonable estimate of the existing ambient noise level in the backyards is 58.4 dBA Leq. The noise attenuation provided by the elevation change will not be as pronounce for the construction equipment for two reasons: (i) it will operate much nearer to the property plane, and (ii) the main noise source is the top of the exhaust stack which is typically 7 to 8 feet high (to minimize workers breathing exhaust fumes). Given these two conditions, the exhaust stack will be visible from the backyards for much of the time. For the assessment of the noise level increase over the existing ambient, it is reasonable to use the average noise level. Calculations made with the RCNM using a distance of 80 ft (the distance from the center of the project site to the center of the backyards) and accounting for the “usage factor” (the percentage of time the machinery is operating) yields Phase Avg (Leq) Noise Level Increase Above Existing Ambient Demolition 74.4 dBA 16.0 dB Grading 75.4 dBA 17.0 dB Site Prep 77.2 dBA 18.8 dB Construction 76.9 dBA 18.5 dB Paving 70.1 dBA 11.7 dB Elevation of El Camino Real & Site Elevation of Backyard Effective wall height: 8 feet 840 El Camino Real Hotel IS/MND Review and Comment on Noise Analysis 5 As the IS/MND states, “an increase . . . of 10 dBA sounds twice . . . loud”. [IS/MND at p. 96] The IS/MND does not state that the character of a sound is also a factor in how noises are perceived. In this case, the construction equipment will make noises in the area for 18 months that are not typical. Finally, it is common practice to use 10 dB as the threshold of significance for temporary increases in ambient noise levels. As the table above indicates, this threshold will be exceeded for all phases of construction. Furthermore, it will exceed 15 dB for four of the five construction phases, the majority of the project development time. Therefore, the temporary increase in ambient noise levels brought about by the construction of the project should be identified as a significant noise impact. * * * * * Please contact me if you have any questions about these comments. Very truly yours, WILSON IHRIG Derek L. Watry Principal Wilson Ihrig – Derek Watry Resume – Page 1 DEREK WATRY Principal Mr. Watry is experienced in all aspects of environmental noise issues, having conducted extensive field measurements, prepared EIR/EIS sections, helped resolve complex community noise issue, established acceptability criteria, and studied meteorological effects on sound transmission. He is well versed in the requirements of CEQA and NEPA. His experience includes responding to community noise complaints that can be miles from transit noise, construction noise, and low- frequency music noise. He has made numerous presentations at public meetings, conducted technical seminars on outdoor noise propagation, and served as the acoustical expert for several legal actions. These experiences have given him a thorough understanding of the technical, public relations, and political aspects of environmental noise and vibration compliance work. Education • M.B.A., Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California • M.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley • B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California at San Diego Relevant Project Experience San Francisco Department of Public Works, Environmental Services On-Call Several task orders with prime consultant. Recent projects have been the Northshore Main Improvement Project, design noise mitigation for a recently constructed SOMA West Skate Park, and a variety of other construction noise and vibration monitoring tasks. City of Fremont Environmental Services On Call (Since 2004) Providing oversight of and acoustical analysis for a variety of task orders. Work tasks primarily focus on noise insulation and vibration control design compliance for new residential projects and peer review other consultant’s projects. King City Silva Ranch Annexation EIR Conducted the noise portion of the EIR and assessed the suitability of the project areas for the intended development. Work included a reconnaissance of existing noise sources and receptors in and around the project areas, and long-term noise measurements at key locations. Loch Lomond Marina EIR, San Rafael Examined traffic noise impacts on existing residences. Provided the project with acoustical analyses and reports to satisfy the requirements of Title 24. Mare Island Dredge and Material Disposal, Vallejo EIR/EIS analysis of noise from planned dredged material off-loading operations. San Francisco Clean Water Program – Richmond Transport Tunnel Environmental compliance monitoring of vibration during soft tunnel mining and boring, cut-and- cover trenching for sewer lines, hard rock tunnel blasting and site remediation. Work involved long-term monitoring of general construction activity, special investigations of groundborne vibration from pumps and bus generated ground vibration, and interaction with the public (homeowners). Construction methods monitored included tunneling, pile driving, heavy equipment operation, and rock blasting. Wilson Ihrig – Derek Watry Resume – Page 2 San Francisco Department of Public Works, 525 Golden Gate Avenue Demolition Noise and vibration monitoring and consultation during demolition of a multi-story office building next to Federal, State, and Municipal Court buildings. San Francisco Department of Public Works, 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Center Technical assistance on issues relating to the demolition and construction work including vibration monitoring, developing specification and reviewing/recommending appropriate methods and equipment for demolition of Old Emergency Center. Patterson Ranch EIR, Fremont Conducted noise and vibration portion of the EIR. Tyco Electronics Annual Noise Compliance Study, Menlo Park Conducted annual noise compliance monitoring. Provided letter critiquing the regulatory requirements and recommending improvements. BART SFO Extension - Construction Vibration and Noise Monitoring Environmental compliance monitoring of noise and vibration during cut-and-cover construction of BART subway structure. Work included extensive monitoring of ground vibration at buildings and structures in close proximity to vibratory pile driving activity to ascertain compliance with construction specification limits. Golden Gate Park Concourse Underground Garage, San Francisco Noise and vibration testing during underground garage construction to monitor for residences and an old sandstone statue during pile driving. Fourth Street Bridge Rehabilitation, San Francisco Construction noise, vibration, and underwater monitoring and support. Work included underwater noise measurements during pile driving and subsequent lab analysis, and ground-to-water transfer mobility measurements and subsequent analysis to predict underwater acoustic pressure levels during concrete abutment demolition. Caltrain Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility, San Jose Noise study of impacts for new maintenance and operations facility built next to existing residential neighborhood. Relevant Expert Consultant Experience Expert consultant review of the noise studies for the following projects: Star Concrete Batch Plant Project Mountain Peak Winery Expansion Project The Shops at Austin Creek Development Monterey Downs and Monterey Horse Park Development Atascadero Del Rio Road Commercial Area Development WinCo Vallejo Development Walmart Tehachapi Development Riverwalk Marketplace, Phase II, Development Walmart Rohnert Park Expansion     EXHIBIT C  2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310) 795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com May 11, 2020 Rebecca Davis Lozeau | Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94618 Subject: Comments on the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project Dear Ms. Davis, We have reviewed the April 2020 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the 840 El Camino Real Hotel Project (“Project”) located in the City of South San Francisco (“City”). The Project proposes to construct a hotel with 95 guest rooms and 71 parking spaces, including 69 spaces in a subterranean parking garage and 2 surface parking spaces, on the 0.46-acre Project site. Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An updated CEQA evaluation should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the surrounding environment. Air Quality Failure to Evaluate Impacts from Project Operational Emissions The IS/MND fails to evaluate the proposed Project’s operational criteria air pollutant emissions. As a result, the proposed Project’s air quality impact is inadequately addressed. Until an updated analysis quantifies and compares the proposed Project’s operational emissions to the correct BAAQMD thresholds, the proposed Project should not be approved. Regarding the proposed Project’s operational criteria air pollutant emissions, the IS/MND states: 2 “The BAAQMD operational screening level size for hotels is 489 guest rooms. The proposed project includes 95 guest rooms and therefore is below the screening size. As a result, per BAAQMD guidance, a detailed air quality assessment of their project’s criteria air pollutant emissions is not necessary, and project operation would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Impacts would be less than significant” (p. 37). As the excerpt above demonstrates, the IS/MND claims that the proposed hotel is less than the BAAQMD’s screening level size, and thus, does not need to evaluate the criteria pollutant emissions. However, review of the BAAQMD’s 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines reveals that this is incorrect. Specifically, according to the BAAQMD’s 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, this operational criteria pollutant screening size only applies to operational NOx emissions (see excerpt below).1 As you can see in the excerpt above, the BAAQMD’s operational criteria pollutant screening size for hotels of 489 rooms only applies to Project NOX emissions. As such, we can reasonably conclude that the proposed Project’s operational CO, PM2.5, PM10, and SOX emissions were not previously considered by the IS/MND. As a result, an updated air quality analysis, including an analysis of all of the Project’s criteria air pollutant emissions, should be prepared in a Project-specific EIR. Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The IS/MND’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2.2 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project- specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.3 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters were utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values were changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.4 1 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 3-2, Table 3-1. 2 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4. 3 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 1, 9. 4 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, fn 1, p. 11, 12 – 13. A key feature 3 Review of the Project’s air modeling demonstrates that the IS/MND underestimates emissions associated with Project activities. As previously stated, the IS/MND’s air quality analysis relies on air pollutant emissions calculated using CalEEMod. When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided as Appendix AQ to the IS/MND, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated. An updated EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality. Unsubstantiated Utility Company & Associated Intensity Factors Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the utility company was modeled as “User Defined” with a manually-inputted CO2 intensity factor of 105.93, a CH4 intensity factor of 0 and an N20 intensity factor of 0 (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 148, 180). Furthermore, according to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the CO2, CH4, and N20 intensity factors are a result of the Project’s use of “Peninsula Clean Energy” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). However, this is incorrect for two reasons. First, the IS/MND fails to provide a source for the intensity factors assumed by the model. Second, the IS/MND states that PG&E would provide natural gas to the Project site, while Peninsula Clean Energy would provide electric supply (p. 22). Thus, it is incorrect to assume the only utility company would be Peninsula Clean Energy. As a result, we cannot verify the intensity factors used in the model. This presents an issue, as CalEEMod the CO2, CH4, and N20 intensity factors to calculate the Project’s greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions associated with electricity use. 5 Thus, by including an unsubstantiated reduction to the Project’s CO2 intensity factor, the model may underestimate the Project’s GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Schedule Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model included several changes to the CalEEMod default construction period for the Project (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 182). of the CalEEMod program is the “remarks” feature, where the user explains why a default setting was replaced by a “user defined” value. These remarks are included in the report. 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: CalEEMod.com, p. 17. 4 As you can see in the excerpt above, each phase of the construction period was increased from the default. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.6 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “Applicant provided schedule” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the IS/MND states: “The construction schedule and list of construction equipment were based on applicant-provided data” (p. 36). However, this fails to justify the changes to the construction schedule, as the IS/MND fails to specify what the construction schedule would be. Thus, these changes are unsubstantiated. This presents an issue, as spreading out construction emissions over a longer period than is expected results in an underestimation of the maximum daily emissions associated with construction. Thus, the construction schedule assumed by the model is incorrect, and as a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions. Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Horsepower, Load Factor, and Unit Amount Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that several changes were made to the Project’s anticipated off-road construction equipment horsepower, load factor, and unit amount values (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 180). As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.7 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “Applicant-provided list” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the construction equipment list used in the Project’s CalEEMod model is consistent with the construction equipment list used in the Fuel Consumption Calculations (Appendix NRG, pp. 625). However, the IS/MND fails to disclose the “Applicant-provided” construction equipment list in order to justify these changes, as well as the use of the revised construction equipment list in the fuel consumption 6 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9 7 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9 5 calculations. As a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Changes to Number of Worker and Vendor Trips Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that several changes were made to the Project’s anticipated number of vendor and worker trips (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 180). As you can see in the excerpt above, several vendor and worker trip numbers were reduced, resulting in a net decrease of trips required for construction. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.8 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non- Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “Applicant provided” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the number of worker and vendor trips used in the Project’s CalEEMod model is consistent with the number of worker and vendor trips used in the Fuel Consumption Calculations (Appendix NRG, pp. 626). However, the IS/MND fails to mention or justify these changes. As a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Change to Indoor Water Use Rate Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the Project’s indoor water use rate was manually decreased from 2,409,843.15 gallons per year (“gpy”) to 1,927,875 gpy (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 150, 182). As you can see in the excerpt above, the indoor water use rate was reduced by approximately 20%. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.9 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the IS/MND states: 8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9 9 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9 6 “Modeling of GHG emissions from water consumption and wastewater generation includes a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use to account for compliance with CALGreen, use of low- flow fixtures, and installation of a water-efficient irrigation system” (p. 71). However, these justifications are insufficient for three reasons. First, the IS/MND fails to indicate what specific measures would be implemented to allow the Project to achieve a 20% reduction to its indoor water use rate. Second, water use reductions are already accounted for by the model’s water-related operational mitigation measures (Appendix AQ, pp. 178, 212). By including both the water-related operational mitigation measures, and a 20% reduction of the Project’s initial indoor water use rate, the model is double-counting the water use reduction. Third, this change is unsubstantiated. Without disclosing the calculations used to estimate the 20% reduction, we cannot verify that this will actually be achieved on the Project site. This presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses the indoor water use rate inputted to calculate the Project’s GHG emissions associated with supplying and treating water and wastewater.10 Thus, by underestimating the Project’s indoor water use rate, the model may underestimate the Project’s GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Unsubstantiated Application of Mobile-, Energy-, and Water-Related Operational Mitigation Measures Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model incorrectly includes several mobile-, energy-, and water-related operational mitigation measures. As a result, the Project’s operational emissions may be underestimated, and the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. First, the Project’s CalEEMod output files reveal that the model included the following mobile-related mitigation measures: “Improve Destination Accessibility” and “Increase Transit Accessibility” (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 173, 206). Second, the Project’s CalEEMod output files reveal that the model included the following energy-related mitigation measures: “Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated” and “Install Energy Efficient Appliances” (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 175, 208). 10 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 44 7 Third, review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model included the following water-related operational mitigation measures: “Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet,” “Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet,” “Install Low Flow Toilet,” “Install Low Flow Shower,” and “Use Water Efficient Irrigation System” (see excerpt below) (Appendix AQ, pp. 178, 212). However, the inclusion of the above-mentioned mobile-, energy-, and water-related operational mitigation measures is unsubstantiated. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, “The mitigation measures included in CalEEMod are largely based on the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/downloads/2010/09/CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf) document. The CAPCOA measure numbers are provided next to the mitigation measures in CalEEMod to assist the user in understanding each measure by referencing back to the CAPCOA document.”11 Review of CAPCOA’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures document demonstrates that the IS/MND fails to substantiate several of the mitigation measures included in the model (see table below). Measure Consistency CAPCOA’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures12 Mobile Measures Measure LUT-4 Improve Destination Accessibility “The VMT reductions for this strategy are based on changes in distance to key destinations versus the standard suburban distance…This distance is used as a baseline to mirror the distance to destinations reflected in the land uses for the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which is the baseline method for determining VMT.” Here, while the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table attempts to substantiate this measure by stating: “Distance to downtown South SF,” the justification fails to provide the actual distance (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the IS/MND states: “Modeling of transportation-related GHG 11 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 53. 12 “Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures.” CAPCOA, August 2010, available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf. 8 The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Distance to downtown or major job center emissions utilized the “Increase Destination Accessibility” and “Increase Transit Accessibility” features in CalEEMod to account for the project site’s proximity to downtown South San Francisco and to the El Camino Real/ Southwood Drive stop for San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) ECR line” (p. 71). However, this again fails to provide the distance to downtown or major job center or address the standard suburban distance. Thus, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. Measure LUT-5 Increase Transit Accessibility “The use of transit results in a model shift and therefore reduced VMT…The project description should include, at a minimum, the following design features: • A transit station/stop with high-quality, high- frequency bus service located within a 5-10 minute walk (or roughly ¼ mile from stop to edge of development), and/or o A rail station located within a 20 minute walk (or roughly ½ mile from station to edge of development) • Fast, frequent, and reliable transit service connecting a high percentage of regional destinations • Neighborhood designed for walking and cycling” The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Distance to transit station in project Here, the “User Entered Comments & Non- Default Data” table attempts to substantiate this measure by stating: “SamTrans ECR stop” (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). Furthermore, the IS/MND indicates that the Project is approximately 150 feet from a bus stop that serves SamTrans routes ECR and 28 (p. 72). However, while the IS/MND and associated documents discuss a nearby transit stop, they fail to address the distance to this stop or the remaining two of the three minimum project design features required: fast, frequent, and reliable transit service connecting regional destinations and neighborhood designed for walking and cycling. Thus, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. Energy Measures 9 Measure AE-1 Alternative Energy Generation “Using electricity generated from renewable or carbon- neutral power systems displaces electricity demand which would ordinarily be supplied by the local utility.” The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Total annual electricity demand (kWh) • Annual amount of electricity to be provided by the on-site power system (kWh) or percent of total electricity demand to be provided by the on-site power system (%) • Carbon intensity of local utility and on-site power system if not carbon neutral Baseline Here, while the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table attempts to substantiate this measure by stating: “50 kW system,” the justification fails to provide the total annual electricity demand or the carbon intensity of local utility and on-site power system (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). In addition, the IS/MND fails to disclose how this measure will be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. Thus, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. Measure BE-4 Install Energy Efficient Appliances “Using energy-efficient appliances reduces a building’s energy consumption as well as the associated GHG emissions from natural gas combustion and electricity production. To take credit for this mitigation measure, the Project Applicant (or contracted builder) would need to ensure that energy efficient appliances are installed. For residential dwellings, typical builder-supplied appliances include refrigerators and dishwashers. Clothes washers and ceiling fans would be applicable if the builder supplied them. For commercial land uses, energy-efficient refrigerators have been evaluated for grocery stores. See Mitigation Method section on how project applicant may quantify additional building types and appliances.” The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Number of dwelling units and/or size of grocery store • Climate Zone • Housing Type (if residential) • Utility provider • Total natural gas demand (kBTU or therms) per dwelling unit or per square foot Here, the “User Entered Comments & Non- Default Data” table fail to provide a justification for the inclusion of this measure (Appendix AQ, pp. 149, 181). While the IS/MND states that “[t]he project would also include energy-efficient appliances,” the IS/MND fails to indicate the total natural gas demand of the Project or the types of energy efficient appliances to be installed. Thus, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. 10 • Types of energy efficient appliances to be installed (refrigerator, dishwasher, or clothes washer for residential land uses and refrigerators for grocery stores) Water Measures Measure WUW-1 Install Low-Flow Water Fixtures “Installing low-flow or high-efficiency water fixtures in buildings reduces water demand, energy demand, and associated indirect GHG emissions.” The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Total expected indoor water demand, without installation of low-flow or high-efficiency fixtures (million gallons), AND • Total expected indoor water demand, after installation of low-flow or high-efficiency fixtures (million gallons), OR • Commitment to low-flow or high-efficiency water fixtures (toilets, showerheads, sink faucets, dishwashers, clothes washers, or all of the above) Here, no justification was provided in the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table. The IS/MND states: “Modeling of GHG emissions from water consumption and wastewater generation includes a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use to account for compliance with CALGreen, use of low-flow fixtures, and installation of a water-efficient irrigation system” (p. 71). However, the IS/MND fails to provide the total expected indoor water demand, without and without the installation or low- low water fixtures, and a commitment to low-flow water fixtures. Thus, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. Measure WUW-4 Use Water-Efficient Landscape Irrigation Systems “Using water-efficient landscape irrigation techniques such as “smart” irrigation technology reduces outdoor water demand, energy demand, and the associated GHG emissions.” The following information needs to be provided by the Project Applicant: • Total expected outdoor water demand, without installation of smart landscape irrigation controller (million gallons). Here, no justification was provided in the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table. The IS/MND states: “Modeling of GHG emissions from water consumption and wastewater generation includes a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use to account for compliance with CALGreen, use of low-flow fixtures, and installation of a water-efficient irrigation system” (p. 71). However, the IS/MND fails to provide the total expected outdoor water demand or the Project-specific percent reduction in outdoor water demand. Thus, the IS/MND 11 • (Optional) Project-specific percent reduction in outdoor water demand, after installation of smart landscape irrigation controller. Percent reduction must be verifiable. Otherwise, use the default value of 6.1%. fails to demonstrate consistency with the measure, and its inclusion in the model is unsubstantiated. Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to determine the proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model for the Project, using the Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND. In our updated model, we selected “Pacific Gas & Electric” as the utility company and left the default intensity factors, construction schedule, and construction equipment list. We also omitted the unsubstantiated operational mitigation measures and changes to worker trips, vendor trips, and indoor water use rates. Our updated analysis demonstrates that the Project’s construction-related VOC and NOX emissions exceed the 54 pounds per day (lbs/day) thresholds set by the BAAQMD (see table below).13 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Model VOC NOx SWAPE 290 252 BAAQMD Regional Threshold (lbs/day) 54 54 Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes When modeled correctly, the Project’s construction-related VOC and NOX emissions exceed the BAAQMD threshold of 54 lbs/day. Thus, our model demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed in the IS/MND. As a result, a updated CEQA evaluation should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND concludes that the proposed Project’s health risk impact would be less than significant without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk assessment (“HRA”) (p. 38). While the IS/MND fails to address the omission of a construction HRA, it attempts to justify the omission of an operational HRA by stating: “Common sources of TACs include, but are not limited to, land uses such as freeways and high- volume roadways, truck distribution centers, ports, rail yards, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners using perchloroethylene, and gasoline dispensing facilities (BAAQMD 13 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, adopted 2010, updated May 2017 , available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017- pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 2-2, Table 2-1. 12 2017c). The proposed project does not involve any of these uses; therefore, it is not considered a common source of TACs...Therefore, project operation would not generate a substantial amount of TAC emissions that could affect nearby sensitive receptors, and impacts would be less than significant” (p. 39). However, this justification and subsequent less than significant impact conclusion is incorrect for two reasons. First, the omission of a quantified construction HRA is inconsistent with the most recent guidance published by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California. In February of 2015, OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.14 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Construction of the Project will produce emissions of DPM, a human carcinogen, through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a construction period of approximately 561 days (Appendix AQ, pp. 155, 188). The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors.15 Therefore, per OEHHA guidelines, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project construction should have been evaluated by the IS/MND. Second, simply because the IS/MND claims that the Project would not involve land uses known to be common sources of TACs does not justify the omission of an operational HRA. Once construction of the Project is complete, the Project will operate for a long period of time. According to the IS/MND’s Traffic Impact Study (“TIS”), provided as Appendix TRA to the IS/MND, Project operation will generate approximately 344 daily vehicle trips, which will generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (Appendix TRA, p. 22). The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).16 Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, we recommend that health risks from Project operation also should have been evaluated, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA. This guidance reflects the most recent health risk policy, and as such, we recommend that an updated assessment of health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from Project construction and operation be included in a revised CEQA evaluation for the Project. 14 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/hotspots2015.html 15 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p. 8-18 16 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p. 8-6, 8-15 13 Third, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified HRA to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation, the IS/MND fails to compare the excess health risk to the BAAQMD’s specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million.17 Thus, the IS/MND should not conclude less than significant health risk impacts resulting from Project construction and operation without quantifying emissions to compare to the proper threshold. Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by Project construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening-level HRA. The results of our assessment, as described below, demonstrate that the Project may result in a significant impact not previously identified or addressed in the IS/MND. In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.18 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA 19 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”)20 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health-related impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the SWAPE CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. SWAPE’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 36 pounds of DPM over the 172-day construction period. The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠�= 36.2 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 172 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 =𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔 Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00110 grams per second (“g/s”). Subtracting the 172-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed 17 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en 18 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf 19 Supra, fn 20. 20 CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 14 that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 27.88 years, approximately. The Project’s operational CalEEMod emissions, calculated by subtracting the existing emissions from the proposed Project, indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 44 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation: 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠�= 43.8 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 365 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 =𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔 Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00063 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 0.46-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of 58 by 32 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.21 Using Google Earth, we found that the closest receptor is located approximately 2 meters east of the Project site. However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that the maximally exposed receptor is located approximately 25 meters from the Project site. The single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 9.961 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 25 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.9961 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single- hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 5.679 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 25 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.5679 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA. Consistent with the default CalEEMod construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and the first 1.87 years of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized averaged concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the remainder of the infantile stage of life, and the entire child and adult stages of life (2 – 16 years) and (16 – 30 years), respectively. 21 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” EPA, 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 4-36. 15 Consistent with OEHHA 22, as recommended by SCAQMD, BAAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (“ASF”) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.23, 24, 25, 26 According to this guidance, the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant) as well as multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 – 16 years). We also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older OEHHA guidance from 2003. This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by BAAQMD, the air quality district with jurisdiction over the City, and several other air districts in the state. Furthermore, in accordance with the guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants.27 Finally, according to BAAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home (“FAH”) value of 0.85 for the 3rd trimester and infant receptors, 0.72 for child receptors, and 0.73 for the adult receptors.28 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days. The results of our calculations are shown below. The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Activity Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Breathing Rate (L/kg- day) Cancer Risk without ASFs* ASF Cancer Risk with ASFs* Construction 0.25 0.9961 361 1.2E-06 10 1.2E-05 22 “The Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment issued updated guidance for the preparation of health risk assessments in March 2015 (OEHHA 2015)” (p. 5.2-29). 23 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 24 “Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Proposed The Exchange (SCH No. 2018071058).” SCAQMD, March 2019, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/comment- letters/2019/march/RVC190115-03.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p. 4. 25 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 56; see also “Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards.” BAAQMD, May 2011, available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20Modeling%20Approac h.ashx, p. 65, 86. 26 “Update to District’s Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA’s Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document.” SJVAPCD, May 2015, available at: https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf, p. 8, 20, 24. 27 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act,” June 5, 2015, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 19. “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 28 “Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Guidelines.” BAAQMD, January 2016, available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/rules-and-regs/workshops/2016/reg-2-5/hra- guidelines_clean_jan_2016-pdf.pdf?la=en 16 3rd Trimester Duration 0.25 1.2E-06 3rd Trimester Exposure 1.2E-05 Construction 1.87 0.9961 1090 2.6E-05 10 2.6E-04 Operation 0.13 0.5679 1090 1.0E-06 10 1.0E-05 Infant Exposure Duration 2.00 2.7E-05 Infant Exposure 2.7E-04 Operation 14.00 0.5679 572 4.9E-05 3 1.5E-04 Child Exposure Duration 14.00 4.9E-05 Child Exposure 1.5E-04 Operation 14.00 0.5679 261 2.3E-05 1 2.3E-05 Adult Exposure Duration 14.00 2.3E-05 Adult Exposure 2.3E-05 Lifetime Exposure Duration 30.00 1.0E-04 Lifetime Exposure 4.5E-04 * We, along with CARB and BAAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance, which includes ASFs. As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risk to adults, children, infants, and during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy at the MEIR located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing age sensitivity factors, are approximately 23, 150, 270, and 12 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), utilizing age sensitivity factors, is approximately 450 in one million. The 3rd trimester, infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks all exceed the BAAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the IS/MND. Utilizing age sensitivity factors is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and reflects recommendations from the air district. Results without age sensitivity factors are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the MEIR, located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without age sensitivity factors, are approximately 23, 49, 27, and 1.2 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the MEIR, without age sensitivity factors, is approximately 100 in one million. The infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks, without age sensitivity factors, exceed the BAAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified. While we recommend the use of age sensitivity factors, health risk impacts exceed the BAAQMD threshold regardless. An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to 17 be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. 29 The purpose of the screening-level construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project’s emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used. Therefore, since our screening-level HRA indicates a potentially significant impact, the City should prepare an EIR with an HRA which makes a reasonable effort to connect the Project’s air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors. Thus, the City should prepare an updated, quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation. Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts The IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate annual GHG emissions of 577 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/yr”), which would be less than the BAAQMD threshold of 660 MT CO2e/yr (p. 72, 73). Furthermore, the IS/MND concludes that, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, the Project would be consistent with the City of South San Francisco CAP (p. 74). As a result, the IS/MND concludes that the Project’s GHG impact would be less than significant. However, this is incorrect for four reasons: (1) The IS/MND’s GHG analysis is incorrect and unsubstantiated; (2) The City of South San Francisco CAP cannot be relied upon to determine Project significance; and (3) Updated analysis indicates a potentially significant GHG impact. 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated GHG Analysis The IS/MND’s analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model, as discussed above. This is incorrect, as the IS/MND’s air model underestimates the Project’s GHG emissions. As a result, the IS/MND’s GHG significance determination should not be relied upon. 2) The City’s CAP is Inapplicable to the Project Second, the City’s CAP is out of date and inapplicable to the proposed Project. According to the IS/MND, “The City’s CAP is not a qualified GHG Reduction Strategy because it does not establish a 2030 GHG emissions reduction target consistent with SB 32” (p. 72). Thus, the City’s CAP lacks a GHG emissions reduction target consistent with SB 32 and cannot be used as a GHG Reduction Strategy to determine the significance of the Project’s GHG impact. As a result, the Project’s consistency with the City’s CAP should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. 3) Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant GHG Impact 29 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 1-5 18 Applicable thresholds and modeling demonstrate that the proposed Project may result in a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified or addressed by the IS/MND. The CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE utilizing Project-specific information as disclosed in the IS/MND, disclose annual operational GHG emissions of approximately 998 MT CO2e/year (sum of area, energy, mobile, waste, and water-related emissions). When we compare the Project’s operational GHG emissions to the BAAQMD bright-line threshold of 660 MT CO2e/year, as cited by the IS/MND, we find that the Project’s GHG emissions exceed the threshold (see table below). SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Area 0.003 Energy 621.496 Mobile 343.272 Waste 26.156 Water 7.362 Total 998.290 Threshold 660 Exceed? Yes As demonstrated in the table above, the proposed Project would generate approximately 998 MT CO2e/year, which exceeds the BAAQMD’s 660 MT CO2e/year threshold (p. 72). Hence, a service population analysis is warranted. According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, service population is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”30 As the Project does not propose any residential land uses, we assumed that the Project will not result in any new residents. For the hotel land use, the IS/MND failed to provide the estimated number of employees. As a result, we used the United States Department of Energy’s square foot per employee value (“SF/employee”) of 1,124 for “Lodging.”31 Thus, we estimate that the Project’s number of employees would be 123, and the Project’s service population would be 123.32 When dividing the Project’s GHG emissions by a service population value of 123 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 8.1 MT CO2e/SP/year.33 The BAAQMD regularly utilizes a substantial progress population efficiency target goal of 2.6 MT CO2e/SP/year for target year 2030.34 In addition, the IS/MND 30 CAPCOA (Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf. 31 “BUILDING AREA PER EMPLOYEE BY BUSINESS TYPE.” May 2008, City of Davis, available at: https://www.cityofdavis.org/home/showdocument?id=4579. 32 Calculated: number of residents + number of employees = 0 + 123 = 123. 33 Calculated: (998 MT CO2e/year) / (123 service population) = (8.1 MT CO2e/SP/year). 34 “Final White Paper Beyond 2020 and Newhall.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at: https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 40; see also Santa Clara University Housing Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment, October 2019, available at: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=45718; see also Facebook Campus Expansion Project Draft 19 cites to the 2020 BAAQMD service population efficiency threshold of 4.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (p. 71). Using these thresholds, we find that the Project would result in a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified or addressed by the IS/MND (see table below). SWAPE Service Population Efficiency Analysis Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Annual GHG Emissions 998.3 Service Population 123 Service Population Efficiency 8.1 Threshold 4.6 Exceed? Yes Threshold 2.6 Exceed? Yes As the table above demonstrates, when the Project’s emissions are modeled correctly, the Project’s total GHG emissions exceed both the “Substantial Progress” efficiency threshold for 2030 of 2.6 MT CO2e/SP/year as well as the outdated 2020 service population efficiency threshold of 4.6 MT CO2e/SP/year indicated by the IS/MND (p. 71). Thus, the Project may result in a significant GHG impact not previously assessed or identified in the IS/MND. As a result, an updated GHG analysis should be prepared in an updated Project-specific EIR and additional mitigation should be incorporated into the Project. SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, Environmental Impact Report, City of Menlo Park, May 2016, available at: https://www.menlopark.org/DocumentCenter/View/10286/Ch03-05_GHG_Draft-EIR?bidId= 20 Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Start date and time 05/11/20 12:12:41 AERSCREEN 16216 840 El Camino Real 840 El Camino Real ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ----------------- METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** --------------- ---------------- Emission Rate: 0.110E-02 g/s 0.877E-02 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 58.00 meters 190.29 feet Area Source Width: 32.00 meters 104.99 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 67733 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2020.05.11_840ElCaminoReal_Construction.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 05/11/20 12:13:34 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 05/11/20 12:13:40 REFINE started 05/11/20 12:13:40 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 05/11/20 12:13:40 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 05/11/20 12:13:42 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.73348E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99614E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.10334E+02 30.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58295E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32518E+01 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21583E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15756E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12210E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98445E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81787E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69418E+00 225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60002E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52597E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46635E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41747E+00 325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37688E+00 350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34271E+00 375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31361E+00 400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28855E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26682E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24777E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23091E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21587E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20245E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19041E+00 575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18033E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17047E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16151E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15333E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14584E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13897E+00 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13263E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12678E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12136E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11633E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11166E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10729E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10322E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99404E-01 925.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95828E-01 950.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92468E-01 975.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89308E-01 1000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86329E-01 1025.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83519E-01 1050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80863E-01 1075.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78351E-01 1100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75970E-01 1125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73712E-01 1149.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71568E-01 1175.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69530E-01 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67590E-01 1225.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65742E-01 1249.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63979E-01 1275.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62297E-01 1300.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60690E-01 1325.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59154E-01 1350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57684E-01 1375.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56276E-01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54926E-01 1425.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53631E-01 1450.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52389E-01 1475.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51195E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50048E-01 1525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48944E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47883E-01 1574.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46860E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45874E-01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44924E-01 1650.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44008E-01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43123E-01 1700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42269E-01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41444E-01 1750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40646E-01 1775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39874E-01 1800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39127E-01 1825.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38405E-01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37705E-01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37027E-01 1900.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36369E-01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35732E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35114E-01 1975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34514E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33932E-01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33366E-01 2050.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32817E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32283E-01 2100.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31764E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31259E-01 2150.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30768E-01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30290E-01 2200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29825E-01 2224.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29372E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28931E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28501E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28082E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27674E-01 2350.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27276E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26887E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26509E-01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26139E-01 2449.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25778E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25426E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25082E-01 2525.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24746E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24417E-01 2575.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24096E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23783E-01 2625.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23476E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23176E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22883E-01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22596E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22315E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22041E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21772E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21508E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21251E-01 2850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20998E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20751E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20508E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20271E-01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20038E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19810E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19586E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19367E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19151E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18940E-01 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18733E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18530E-01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18331E-01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18135E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17943E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17754E-01 3250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17569E-01 3275.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17387E-01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17209E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17033E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16861E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16691E-01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16525E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16361E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16200E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16042E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15887E-01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15734E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15584E-01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15436E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15290E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15147E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15006E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14868E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14731E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14597E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14465E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14335E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14207E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14081E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13957E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13834E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13714E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13596E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13479E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13364E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13250E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13138E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13028E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12920E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12813E-01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12707E-01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12603E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12501E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12400E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12300E-01 4250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12202E-01 4275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12105E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12009E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11915E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11822E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11730E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11639E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11550E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11462E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11375E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11289E-01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11204E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11121E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11038E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10956E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10876E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10797E-01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10718E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10641E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10564E-01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10488E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10414E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10340E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10267E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10195E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10124E-01 4900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10054E-01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99846E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99161E-02 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98483E-02 5000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Start date and time 05/11/20 12:13:52 AERSCREEN 16216 840 El Camino Operation 840 El Camino Operation ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ----------------- METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** --------------- ---------------- Emission Rate: 0.630E-03 g/s 0.500E-02 lb/hr Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet Area Source Length: 58.00 meters 190.29 feet Area Source Width: 32.00 meters 104.99 feet Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet Model Mode: URBAN Population: 67733 Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet ** BUILDING DATA ** No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2020.05.11_840ElCamino_Operation.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 05/11/20 12:14:43 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 05/11/20 12:14:49 REFINE started 05/11/20 12:14:49 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 05/11/20 12:14:50 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 05/11/20 12:14:52 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.41818E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56793E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.58916E+01 30.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33236E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18540E+01 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12305E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89829E+00 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69612E+00 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56127E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46629E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39577E+00 225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34209E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29987E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26588E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23802E+00 325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21487E+00 350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19539E+00 375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17880E+00 400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16451E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15212E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14126E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13165E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12307E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11542E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10856E+00 575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10281E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97192E-01 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92085E-01 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87421E-01 675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83151E-01 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79230E-01 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75618E-01 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72283E-01 775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69194E-01 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66326E-01 825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63659E-01 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61172E-01 875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58849E-01 900.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56674E-01 925.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54634E-01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52719E-01 975.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50917E-01 1000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49219E-01 1025.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47617E-01 1050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46103E-01 1075.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44670E-01 1100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43313E-01 1125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42026E-01 1150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40803E-01 1175.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39641E-01 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38535E-01 1225.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37482E-01 1250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36477E-01 1275.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35518E-01 1300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34602E-01 1325.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33726E-01 1350.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32887E-01 1375.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32084E-01 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31315E-01 1425.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30577E-01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29869E-01 1475.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29188E-01 1500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28534E-01 1525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27905E-01 1550.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27299E-01 1574.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26716E-01 1600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26154E-01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25613E-01 1650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25090E-01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24586E-01 1700.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24099E-01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23628E-01 1750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23173E-01 1775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22734E-01 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22308E-01 1825.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21896E-01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21497E-01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21110E-01 1900.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20736E-01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20372E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20020E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19678E-01 2000.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19346E-01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19023E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18710E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18405E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18110E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17822E-01 2150.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17542E-01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17269E-01 2200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17004E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16746E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16494E-01 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16249E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16011E-01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15778E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15551E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15329E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15113E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14903E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14697E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14496E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14300E-01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14108E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13921E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13738E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13559E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13384E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13214E-01 2675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13046E-01 2700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12883E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12723E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12566E-01 2775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12413E-01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12263E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12116E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11972E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11831E-01 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11692E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11557E-01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11424E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11294E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11167E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11042E-01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10919E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10799E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10681E-01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10565E-01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10451E-01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10339E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10230E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10122E-01 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10017E-01 3275.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99131E-02 3300.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98112E-02 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97111E-02 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.96128E-02 3375.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95163E-02 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94213E-02 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93280E-02 3450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92363E-02 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91462E-02 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90575E-02 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89704E-02 3550.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88847E-02 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88004E-02 3600.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87174E-02 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86358E-02 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85555E-02 3675.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84765E-02 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83988E-02 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83223E-02 3750.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82470E-02 3775.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81728E-02 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80999E-02 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80280E-02 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79572E-02 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78875E-02 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78188E-02 3925.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77512E-02 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76846E-02 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76190E-02 4000.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75543E-02 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74906E-02 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74278E-02 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73659E-02 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73049E-02 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72448E-02 4149.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71855E-02 4175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71270E-02 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70694E-02 4225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70126E-02 4250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69566E-02 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69013E-02 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68468E-02 4325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67930E-02 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67400E-02 4375.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66876E-02 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66360E-02 4425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65851E-02 4449.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65348E-02 4475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64852E-02 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64363E-02 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63879E-02 4550.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63402E-02 4575.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62931E-02 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62467E-02 4625.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62008E-02 4650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61555E-02 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61107E-02 4700.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60665E-02 4725.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60229E-02 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59798E-02 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59373E-02 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58952E-02 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58537E-02 4850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58127E-02 4875.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57722E-02 4900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57321E-02 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56926E-02 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56535E-02 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56149E-02 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 1 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about utility company. Land Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction. Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE comment about construction equipment list. Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment about worker and vendor trips. Demolition - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Energy Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater - 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 2 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0445 0.6176 0.3605 1.3800e- 003 0.0367 0.0181 0.0548 9.9800e- 003 0.0168 0.0268 0.0000 129.2650 129.2650 0.0145 0.0000 129.6270 2021 0.7531 0.2782 0.2482 6.0000e- 004 0.0178 0.0119 0.0297 4.8300e- 003 0.0110 0.0158 0.0000 54.4839 54.4839 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 54.7190 Maximum 0.7531 0.6176 0.3605 1.3800e- 003 0.0367 0.0181 0.0548 9.9800e- 003 0.0168 0.0268 0.0000 129.2650 129.2650 0.0145 0.0000 129.6270 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0445 0.6176 0.3605 1.3800e- 003 0.0367 0.0181 0.0548 9.9800e- 003 0.0168 0.0268 0.0000 129.2649 129.2649 0.0145 0.0000 129.6270 2021 0.7531 0.2782 0.2482 6.0000e- 004 0.0178 0.0119 0.0297 4.8300e- 003 0.0110 0.0158 0.0000 54.4839 54.4839 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 54.7189 Maximum 0.7531 0.6176 0.3605 1.3800e- 003 0.0367 0.0181 0.0548 9.9800e- 003 0.0168 0.0268 0.0000 129.2649 129.2649 0.0145 0.0000 129.6270 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 3 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 618.5286 618.5286 0.0210 8.2000e- 003 621.4962 Mobile 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7645 4.0660 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Total 0.7394 0.6745 1.2535 5.2100e- 003 0.3286 0.0219 0.3504 0.0882 0.0217 0.1098 11.3221 965.5595 976.8816 0.7360 0.0101 998.2896 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 0.7685 0.7685 2 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 1.0373 1.0373 Highest 1.0373 1.0373 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 4 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 618.5286 618.5286 0.0210 8.2000e- 003 621.4962 Mobile 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7645 4.0660 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Total 0.7394 0.6745 1.2535 5.2100e- 003 0.3286 0.0219 0.3504 0.0882 0.0217 0.1098 11.3221 965.5595 976.8816 0.7360 0.0101 998.2896 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 5 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 10/14/2020 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/15/2020 10/15/2020 5 1 3 Grading Grading 10/16/2020 10/19/2020 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 10/20/2020 3/8/2021 5 100 5 Paving Paving 3/9/2021 3/15/2021 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2021 3/22/2021 5 5 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 6 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 7 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3400e- 003 0.0394 0.0381 6.0000e- 005 2.3400e- 003 2.3400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0000 5.2038 5.2038 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.2284 Total 4.3400e- 003 0.0394 0.0381 6.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.3400e- 003 3.3200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 5.2038 5.2038 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.2284 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 8 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3461 0.3461 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3464 Total 2.1000e- 004 1.4400e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.6910 0.6910 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6917 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3400e- 003 0.0394 0.0381 6.0000e- 005 2.3400e- 003 2.3400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0000 5.2038 5.2038 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.2284 Total 4.3400e- 003 0.0394 0.0381 6.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.3400e- 003 3.3200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 5.2038 5.2038 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.2284 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 9 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3461 0.3461 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3464 Total 2.1000e- 004 1.4400e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.6910 0.6910 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6917 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.4000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4314 Total 3.4000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4314 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 10 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0173 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0173 Total 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0173 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0173 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.4000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4314 Total 3.4000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4314 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 11 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0173 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0173 Total 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0173 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0173 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 1.5000e- 003 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.7000e- 004 7.8700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0457 Total 8.7000e- 004 7.8700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.9700e- 003 5.3000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0457 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 12 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0693 Total 6.9700e- 003 0.2431 0.0491 6.6000e- 004 0.0141 7.8000e- 004 0.0149 3.8800e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 63.7932 63.7932 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8752 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 1.5000e- 003 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.7000e- 004 7.8700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0457 Total 8.7000e- 004 7.8700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.9700e- 003 5.3000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0457 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 13 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0693 Total 6.9700e- 003 0.2431 0.0491 6.6000e- 004 0.0141 7.8000e- 004 0.0149 3.8800e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 63.7932 63.7932 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8752 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0228 0.2346 0.1958 3.0000e- 004 0.0138 0.0138 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 26.5160 26.5160 8.5800e- 003 0.0000 26.7304 Total 0.0228 0.2346 0.1958 3.0000e- 004 0.0138 0.0138 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 26.5160 26.5160 8.5800e- 003 0.0000 26.7304 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 14 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.7700e- 003 0.0826 0.0208 2.0000e- 004 4.6900e- 003 4.0000e- 004 5.0900e- 003 1.3600e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 0.0000 18.7332 18.7332 9.7000e- 004 0.0000 18.7573 Worker 6.1500e- 003 4.4000e- 003 0.0456 1.4000e- 004 0.0147 1.0000e- 004 0.0148 3.9000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 3.9900e- 003 0.0000 12.8418 12.8418 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 12.8496 Total 8.9200e- 003 0.0870 0.0663 3.4000e- 004 0.0194 5.0000e- 004 0.0199 5.2600e- 003 4.8000e- 004 5.7300e- 003 0.0000 31.5750 31.5750 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 31.6069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0228 0.2346 0.1958 3.0000e- 004 0.0138 0.0138 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 26.5160 26.5160 8.5800e- 003 0.0000 26.7304 Total 0.0228 0.2346 0.1958 3.0000e- 004 0.0138 0.0138 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 26.5160 26.5160 8.5800e- 003 0.0000 26.7304 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 15 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.7700e- 003 0.0826 0.0208 2.0000e- 004 4.6900e- 003 4.0000e- 004 5.0900e- 003 1.3600e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 0.0000 18.7332 18.7332 9.7000e- 004 0.0000 18.7573 Worker 6.1500e- 003 4.4000e- 003 0.0456 1.4000e- 004 0.0147 1.0000e- 004 0.0148 3.9000e- 003 9.0000e- 005 3.9900e- 003 0.0000 12.8418 12.8418 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 12.8496 Total 8.9200e- 003 0.0870 0.0663 3.4000e- 004 0.0194 5.0000e- 004 0.0199 5.2600e- 003 4.8000e- 004 5.7300e- 003 0.0000 31.5750 31.5750 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 31.6069 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0182 0.1877 0.1707 2.7000e- 004 0.0105 0.0105 9.6800e- 003 9.6800e- 003 0.0000 23.5193 23.5193 7.6100e- 003 0.0000 23.7095 Total 0.0182 0.1877 0.1707 2.7000e- 004 0.0105 0.0105 9.6800e- 003 9.6800e- 003 0.0000 23.5193 23.5193 7.6100e- 003 0.0000 23.7095 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 16 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0100e- 003 0.0663 0.0165 1.7000e- 004 4.1600e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 0.0000 16.4554 16.4554 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 16.4756 Worker 5.0500e- 003 3.4800e- 003 0.0369 1.2000e- 004 0.0130 9.0000e- 005 0.0131 3.4600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.5400e- 003 0.0000 10.9884 10.9884 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 10.9946 Total 7.0600e- 003 0.0698 0.0534 2.9000e- 004 0.0172 2.3000e- 004 0.0174 4.6600e- 003 2.2000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 0.0000 27.4438 27.4438 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 27.4702 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0182 0.1877 0.1707 2.7000e- 004 0.0105 0.0105 9.6800e- 003 9.6800e- 003 0.0000 23.5193 23.5193 7.6100e- 003 0.0000 23.7094 Total 0.0182 0.1877 0.1707 2.7000e- 004 0.0105 0.0105 9.6800e- 003 9.6800e- 003 0.0000 23.5193 23.5193 7.6100e- 003 0.0000 23.7094 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 17 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0100e- 003 0.0663 0.0165 1.7000e- 004 4.1600e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 0.0000 16.4554 16.4554 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 16.4756 Worker 5.0500e- 003 3.4800e- 003 0.0369 1.2000e- 004 0.0130 9.0000e- 005 0.0131 3.4600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.5400e- 003 0.0000 10.9884 10.9884 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 10.9946 Total 7.0600e- 003 0.0698 0.0534 2.9000e- 004 0.0172 2.3000e- 004 0.0174 4.6600e- 003 2.2000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 0.0000 27.4438 27.4438 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 27.4702 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 1.8000e- 003 0.0168 0.0177 3.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.3481 2.3481 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.3652 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8000e- 003 0.0168 0.0177 3.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.3481 2.3481 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.3652 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 18 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3006 0.3006 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3008 Total 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3006 0.3006 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3008 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 1.8000e- 003 0.0168 0.0177 3.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.3481 2.3481 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.3652 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8000e- 003 0.0168 0.0177 3.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.3481 2.3481 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.3652 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 19 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3006 0.3006 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3008 Total 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3006 0.3006 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3008 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.5000e- 004 3.8200e- 003 4.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6394 Total 0.7257 3.8200e- 003 4.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6394 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 20 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2338 0.2338 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2339 Total 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2338 0.2338 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2339 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.5000e- 004 3.8200e- 003 4.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6394 Total 0.7257 3.8200e- 003 4.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6394 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 21 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2338 0.2338 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2339 Total 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2338 0.2338 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2339 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 22 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 Unmitigated 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 23 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 349.7784 349.7784 0.0158 3.2700e- 003 351.1489 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 349.7784 349.7784 0.0158 3.2700e- 003 351.1489 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 24 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 25 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 166424 48.4147 2.1900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 48.6044 Hotel 1.03593e +006 301.3637 0.0136 2.8200e- 003 302.5446 Total 349.7784 0.0158 3.2700e- 003 351.1489 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 166424 48.4147 2.1900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 48.6044 Hotel 1.03593e +006 301.3637 0.0136 2.8200e- 003 302.5446 Total 349.7784 0.0158 3.2700e- 003 351.1489 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 26 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 27 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 28 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Unmitigated 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 2.40984 / 0.26776 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Total 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 29 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 2.40984 / 0.26776 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Total 4.8306 0.0787 1.8900e- 003 7.3621 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 30 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 31 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 32 of 32 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 1 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about utility company. Land Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction. Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE comment about construction equipment list. Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment about worker and vendor trips. Demolition - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Energy Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater - 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 2 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 7.7633 246.0727 55.2274 0.6743 16.1130 1.2463 17.3593 4.5301 1.1910 5.7211 0.0000 71,971.96 47 71,971.96 47 3.7578 0.0000 72,065.90 98 2021 290.3417 10.9067 9.6411 0.0243 0.7578 0.4572 1.2150 0.2051 0.4209 0.6260 0.0000 2,437.775 5 2,437.775 5 0.4058 0.0000 2,447.920 8 Maximum 290.3417 246.0727 55.2274 0.6743 16.1130 1.2463 17.3593 4.5301 1.1910 5.7211 0.0000 71,971.96 47 71,971.96 47 3.7578 0.0000 72,065.90 98 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 7.7633 246.0727 55.2274 0.6743 16.1130 1.2463 17.3593 4.5301 1.1910 5.7211 0.0000 71,971.96 47 71,971.96 47 3.7578 0.0000 72,065.90 98 2021 290.3417 10.9067 9.6411 0.0243 0.7578 0.4572 1.2150 0.2051 0.4209 0.6260 0.0000 2,437.775 5 2,437.775 5 0.4058 0.0000 2,447.920 8 Maximum 290.3417 246.0727 55.2274 0.6743 16.1130 1.2463 17.3593 4.5301 1.1910 5.7211 0.0000 71,971.96 47 71,971.96 47 3.7578 0.0000 72,065.90 98 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 3 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 Total 4.5660 5.1789 11.0358 0.0444 3.1403 0.1313 3.2716 0.8401 0.1294 0.9695 5,300.939 3 5,300.939 3 0.1572 0.0298 5,313.737 3 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 Total 4.5660 5.1789 11.0358 0.0444 3.1403 0.1313 3.2716 0.8401 0.1294 0.9695 5,300.939 3 5,300.939 3 0.1572 0.0298 5,313.737 3 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 4 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 10/14/2020 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/15/2020 10/15/2020 5 1 3 Grading Grading 10/16/2020 10/19/2020 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 10/20/2020 3/8/2021 5 100 5 Paving Paving 3/9/2021 3/15/2021 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2021 3/22/2021 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 5 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 6 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1969 0.0000 0.1969 0.0298 0.0000 0.0298 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.1969 0.4672 0.6641 0.0298 0.4457 0.4755 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 7 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.4300e- 003 0.2578 0.0512 7.2000e- 004 0.0157 8.4000e- 004 0.0166 4.3100e- 003 8.1000e- 004 5.1100e- 003 76.5705 76.5705 3.8300e- 003 76.6663 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 0.0422 0.2788 0.3195 1.5400e- 003 0.0979 1.3700e- 003 0.0993 0.0261 1.3000e- 003 0.0274 158.6482 158.6482 5.8100e- 003 158.7934 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1969 0.0000 0.1969 0.0298 0.0000 0.0298 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.1969 0.4672 0.6641 0.0298 0.4457 0.4755 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 8 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.4300e- 003 0.2578 0.0512 7.2000e- 004 0.0157 8.4000e- 004 0.0166 4.3100e- 003 8.1000e- 004 5.1100e- 003 76.5705 76.5705 3.8300e- 003 76.6663 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 0.0422 0.2788 0.3195 1.5400e- 003 0.0979 1.3700e- 003 0.0993 0.0261 1.3000e- 003 0.0274 158.6482 158.6482 5.8100e- 003 158.7934 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.3353 0.3353 0.3085 0.3085 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.5303 0.3353 0.8656 0.0573 0.3085 0.3658 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 9 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0174 0.0105 0.1342 4.1000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 41.0388 41.0388 9.9000e- 004 41.0636 Total 0.0174 0.0105 0.1342 4.1000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 41.0388 41.0388 9.9000e- 004 41.0636 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.3353 0.3353 0.3085 0.3085 0.0000 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.5303 0.3353 0.8656 0.0573 0.3085 0.3658 0.0000 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 10 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0174 0.0105 0.1342 4.1000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 41.0388 41.0388 9.9000e- 004 41.0636 Total 0.0174 0.0105 0.1342 4.1000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 41.0388 41.0388 9.9000e- 004 41.0636 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5048 0.0000 1.5048 0.5277 0.0000 0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 1.5048 0.4672 1.9720 0.5277 0.4457 0.9733 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 11 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 6.8612 238.1788 47.3365 0.6615 14.5261 0.7786 15.3046 3.9806 0.7449 4.7255 70,742.65 18 70,742.65 18 3.5389 70,831.12 49 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 6.8959 238.1998 47.6048 0.6623 14.6082 0.7791 15.3873 4.0024 0.7454 4.7478 70,824.72 95 70,824.72 95 3.5409 70,913.25 20 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5048 0.0000 1.5048 0.5277 0.0000 0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 1.5048 0.4672 1.9720 0.5277 0.4457 0.9733 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 12 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 6.8612 238.1788 47.3365 0.6615 14.5261 0.7786 15.3046 3.9806 0.7449 4.7255 70,742.65 18 70,742.65 18 3.5389 70,831.12 49 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 6.8959 238.1998 47.6048 0.6623 14.6082 0.7791 15.3873 4.0024 0.7454 4.7478 70,824.72 95 70,824.72 95 3.5409 70,913.25 20 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.8962 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.896 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 13 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1024 3.0770 0.7340 7.4400e- 003 0.1828 0.0151 0.1978 0.0526 0.0144 0.0670 787.6117 787.6117 0.0388 788.5814 Worker 0.2433 0.1473 1.8781 5.7700e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 574.5436 574.5436 0.0138 574.8897 Total 0.3457 3.2243 2.6121 0.0132 0.7578 0.0188 0.7766 0.2051 0.0179 0.2230 1,362.155 3 1,362.155 3 0.0526 1,363.471 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.8962 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.896 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 14 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1024 3.0770 0.7340 7.4400e- 003 0.1828 0.0151 0.1978 0.0526 0.0144 0.0670 787.6117 787.6117 0.0388 788.5814 Worker 0.2433 0.1473 1.8781 5.7700e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 574.5436 574.5436 0.0138 574.8897 Total 0.3457 3.2243 2.6121 0.0132 0.7578 0.0188 0.7766 0.2051 0.0179 0.2230 1,362.155 3 1,362.155 3 0.0526 1,363.471 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.135 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 15 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0837 2.7902 0.6580 7.3600e- 003 0.1828 6.0500e- 003 0.1888 0.0526 5.7800e- 003 0.0584 780.1881 780.1881 0.0366 781.1035 Worker 0.2251 0.1315 1.7194 5.5600e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 554.3717 554.3717 0.0124 554.6815 Total 0.3088 2.9218 2.3774 0.0129 0.7578 9.6700e- 003 0.7675 0.2051 9.1100e- 003 0.2143 1,334.559 7 1,334.559 7 0.0490 1,335.785 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.135 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 16 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0837 2.7902 0.6580 7.3600e- 003 0.1828 6.0500e- 003 0.1888 0.0526 5.7800e- 003 0.0584 780.1881 780.1881 0.0366 781.1035 Worker 0.2251 0.1315 1.7194 5.5600e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 554.3717 554.3717 0.0124 554.6815 Total 0.3088 2.9218 2.3774 0.0129 0.7578 9.6700e- 003 0.7675 0.2051 9.1100e- 003 0.2143 1,334.559 7 1,334.559 7 0.0490 1,335.785 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 17 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0579 0.0338 0.4421 1.4300e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 142.5527 142.5527 3.1900e- 003 142.6324 Total 0.0579 0.0338 0.4421 1.4300e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 142.5527 142.5527 3.1900e- 003 142.6324 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 0.0000 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 0.0000 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 18 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0579 0.0338 0.4421 1.4300e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 142.5527 142.5527 3.1900e- 003 142.6324 Total 0.0579 0.0338 0.4421 1.4300e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 142.5527 142.5527 3.1900e- 003 142.6324 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 290.0778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 290.2967 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 19 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Total 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 290.0778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 290.2967 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 20 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Total 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 21 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 Unmitigated 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 22 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 23 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13797.8 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13.7978 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 24 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 25 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 26 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:07 PMPage 27 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 1 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about utility company. Land Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction. Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE comment about construction equipment list. Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment about worker and vendor trips. Demolition - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Grading - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Energy Use - Consistent with IS/MND's model. Water And Wastewater - 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 2 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 7.9531 251.9225 58.8346 0.6632 16.1130 1.2599 17.3729 4.5301 1.2040 5.7341 0.0000 70,777.28 25 70,777.28 25 3.9356 0.0000 70,875.67 15 2021 290.3444 10.9617 9.6286 0.0237 0.7578 0.4574 1.2152 0.2051 0.4211 0.6262 0.0000 2,374.284 7 2,374.284 7 0.4080 0.0000 2,384.484 1 Maximum 290.3444 251.9225 58.8346 0.6632 16.1130 1.2599 17.3729 4.5301 1.2040 5.7341 0.0000 70,777.28 25 70,777.28 25 3.9356 0.0000 70,875.67 15 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 7.9531 251.9225 58.8346 0.6632 16.1130 1.2599 17.3729 4.5301 1.2040 5.7341 0.0000 70,777.28 25 70,777.28 25 3.9356 0.0000 70,875.67 15 2021 290.3444 10.9617 9.6286 0.0237 0.7578 0.4574 1.2152 0.2051 0.4211 0.6262 0.0000 2,374.284 7 2,374.284 7 0.4080 0.0000 2,384.484 1 Maximum 290.3444 251.9225 58.8346 0.6632 16.1130 1.2599 17.3729 4.5301 1.2040 5.7341 0.0000 70,777.28 25 70,777.28 25 3.9356 0.0000 70,875.67 15 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 3 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 Total 4.4108 5.3533 11.2679 0.0421 3.1403 0.1314 3.2718 0.8401 0.1295 0.9697 5,066.127 1 5,066.127 1 0.1607 0.0298 5,079.012 8 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 Total 4.4108 5.3533 11.2679 0.0421 3.1403 0.1314 3.2718 0.8401 0.1295 0.9697 5,066.127 1 5,066.127 1 0.1607 0.0298 5,079.012 8 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 4 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 10/14/2020 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/15/2020 10/15/2020 5 1 3 Grading Grading 10/16/2020 10/19/2020 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 10/20/2020 3/8/2021 5 100 5 Paving Paving 3/9/2021 3/15/2021 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2021 3/22/2021 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 5 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 6 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1969 0.0000 0.1969 0.0298 0.0000 0.0298 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.1969 0.4672 0.6641 0.0298 0.4457 0.4755 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 7 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.6300e- 003 0.2641 0.0552 7.0000e- 004 0.0157 8.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.3100e- 003 8.2000e- 004 5.1300e- 003 75.2844 75.2844 4.0200e- 003 75.3850 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 0.0444 0.2901 0.3072 1.4600e- 003 0.0979 1.3900e- 003 0.0993 0.0261 1.3100e- 003 0.0274 150.8910 150.8910 5.8700e- 003 151.0378 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1969 0.0000 0.1969 0.0298 0.0000 0.0298 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.1969 0.4672 0.6641 0.0298 0.4457 0.4755 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 8 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.6300e- 003 0.2641 0.0552 7.0000e- 004 0.0157 8.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.3100e- 003 8.2000e- 004 5.1300e- 003 75.2844 75.2844 4.0200e- 003 75.3850 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 0.0444 0.2901 0.3072 1.4600e- 003 0.0979 1.3900e- 003 0.0993 0.0261 1.3100e- 003 0.0274 150.8910 150.8910 5.8700e- 003 151.0378 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.3353 0.3353 0.3085 0.3085 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.5303 0.3353 0.8656 0.0573 0.3085 0.3658 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 9 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0184 0.0130 0.1260 3.8000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 37.8033 37.8033 9.2000e- 004 37.8264 Total 0.0184 0.0130 0.1260 3.8000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 37.8033 37.8033 9.2000e- 004 37.8264 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.3353 0.3353 0.3085 0.3085 0.0000 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 003 0.5303 0.3353 0.8656 0.0573 0.3085 0.3658 0.0000 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 10 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0184 0.0130 0.1260 3.8000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 37.8033 37.8033 9.2000e- 004 37.8264 Total 0.0184 0.0130 0.1260 3.8000e- 004 0.0411 2.7000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.5000e- 004 0.0111 37.8033 37.8033 9.2000e- 004 37.8264 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5048 0.0000 1.5048 0.5277 0.0000 0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 1.5048 0.4672 1.9720 0.5277 0.4457 0.9733 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 11 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.0490 244.0236 50.9600 0.6504 14.5261 0.7922 15.3182 3.9806 0.7579 4.7385 69,554.44 08 69,554.44 08 3.7168 69,647.36 09 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 7.0857 244.0496 51.2120 0.6512 14.6082 0.7927 15.4009 4.0024 0.7584 4.7608 69,630.04 73 69,630.04 73 3.7187 69,723.01 37 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5048 0.0000 1.5048 0.5277 0.0000 0.5277 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 1.5048 0.4672 1.9720 0.5277 0.4457 0.9733 0.0000 1,147.235 2 1,147.235 2 0.2169 1,152.657 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 12 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 7.0490 244.0236 50.9600 0.6504 14.5261 0.7922 15.3182 3.9806 0.7579 4.7385 69,554.44 08 69,554.44 08 3.7168 69,647.36 09 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 7.0857 244.0496 51.2120 0.6512 14.6082 0.7927 15.4009 4.0024 0.7584 4.7608 69,630.04 73 69,630.04 73 3.7187 69,723.01 37 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.8962 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.896 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 13 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1077 3.1114 0.8397 7.2500e- 003 0.1828 0.0153 0.1981 0.0526 0.0147 0.0673 767.6836 767.6836 0.0420 768.7324 Worker 0.2574 0.1820 1.7639 5.3100e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 529.2458 529.2458 0.0129 529.5694 Total 0.3651 3.2934 2.6036 0.0126 0.7578 0.0191 0.7769 0.2051 0.0181 0.2232 1,296.929 3 1,296.929 3 0.0549 1,298.301 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.8962 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.896 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 14 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1077 3.1114 0.8397 7.2500e- 003 0.1828 0.0153 0.1981 0.0526 0.0147 0.0673 767.6836 767.6836 0.0420 768.7324 Worker 0.2574 0.1820 1.7639 5.3100e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 529.2458 529.2458 0.0129 529.5694 Total 0.3651 3.2934 2.6036 0.0126 0.7578 0.0191 0.7769 0.2051 0.0181 0.2232 1,296.929 3 1,296.929 3 0.0549 1,298.301 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.135 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 15 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0887 2.8142 0.7563 7.1800e- 003 0.1828 6.2600e- 003 0.1890 0.0526 5.9800e- 003 0.0586 760.3933 760.3933 0.0396 761.3837 Worker 0.2384 0.1625 1.6087 5.1200e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 510.6757 510.6757 0.0116 510.9645 Total 0.3271 2.9767 2.3649 0.0123 0.7578 9.8800e- 003 0.7677 0.2051 9.3100e- 003 0.2145 1,271.069 0 1,271.069 0 0.0512 1,272.348 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 1,103.215 8 1,103.215 8 0.3568 1,112.135 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 16 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0887 2.8142 0.7563 7.1800e- 003 0.1828 6.2600e- 003 0.1890 0.0526 5.9800e- 003 0.0586 760.3933 760.3933 0.0396 761.3837 Worker 0.2384 0.1625 1.6087 5.1200e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 510.6757 510.6757 0.0116 510.9645 Total 0.3271 2.9767 2.3649 0.0123 0.7578 9.8800e- 003 0.7677 0.2051 9.3100e- 003 0.2145 1,271.069 0 1,271.069 0 0.0512 1,272.348 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 17 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0613 0.0418 0.4137 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 131.3166 131.3166 2.9700e- 003 131.3909 Total 0.0613 0.0418 0.4137 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 131.3166 131.3166 2.9700e- 003 131.3909 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 0.0000 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7214 6.7178 7.0899 0.0113 0.3534 0.3534 0.3286 0.3286 0.0000 1,035.342 5 1,035.342 5 0.3016 1,042.881 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 18 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0613 0.0418 0.4137 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 131.3166 131.3166 2.9700e- 003 131.3909 Total 0.0613 0.0418 0.4137 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 131.3166 131.3166 2.9700e- 003 131.3909 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 290.0778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 290.2967 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 19 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Total 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 290.0778 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 290.2967 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 20 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Total 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 21 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 Unmitigated 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 882,871 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 22 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 23 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13797.8 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13.7978 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 24 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 25 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 26 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/11/2020 12:06 PMPage 27 of 27 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa Santa Monica, California 90401 Tel: (949) 887‐9013 Email: mhagemann@swape.com Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: •Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); •Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2014; •Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998); • Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology: With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: • Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests. • Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: • At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. • Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. 6 Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. 7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011. 9 SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405 Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Mobil: (310) 795-2335 Office: (310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email: prosenfeld@swape.com October 2015 1 Rosenfeld CV Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education: Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on VOC filtration. M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience: Dr. Rosenfeld is the Co-Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling, oil spills, boilers, incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins, furans, volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, MtBE, fuel oxygenates and odor. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs recommended by California Air Quality Management Districts. Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling Colorado 1990; Scientist October 2015 2 Rosenfeld CV Publications: Chen, J. A., Zapata, A R., Sutherland, A. J., Molmen, D. R,. Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632. Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125. Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing, Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel. Water Science and Technology. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities. Water Science And Technology. October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262. Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California. October 2015 4 Rosenfeld CV Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. October 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. October 2015 6 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. October 2015 7 Rosenfeld CV Teaching Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001. Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993. October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September, 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al. Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant. Case Number cc-11-01650-E Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio October 2015 9 Rosenfeld CV John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina, County of Aiken David Anderson, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number: 2007-CP-02-1584 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010 In the Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides, State of Louisiana Roger Price, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Roy O. Martin, L.P., et al., Defendants. Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008 In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV1052 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Chevron Oil Company, et al., Defendants. Case Number 1:05 CV 227 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2008 In the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabie, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number 07-2738 G In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Leon B. Brydels, Plaintiffs, vs. Conoco, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case Number 2004-6941 Division A In the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 153rd Judicial District Linda Faust, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Witco Chemical Corporation A/K/A Witco Corporation, Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. and Koppers Industries, Inc., Defendants. Case Number 153-212928-05 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006, October 2007 Rosenfeld Trial: January 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Nutro Products, Inc., a California Corporation and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. John Loney, Plaintiff, vs. James H. Didion, Sr.; Nutro Products, Inc.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case Number VCVVS044671 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2009 Rosenfeld Trial: March 2010 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant. Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011 October 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley, Plaintiffs, vs. Peter T. Hoss, as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration & Production Company, a Delaware corporation; Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Case Number SC094173 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008, October 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm, et al., all individually, Plaintiffs, vs. Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Union Oil Company of California, a California corporation; Chevron Corporation, a California corporation; ConocoPhillips, a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation; and DOES 1 though 100, Defendants. Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) Rosenfeld Deposition: January 2008 In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern District of Arkansas Harry Stephens Farms, Inc, and Harry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership, Plaintiffs, vs. Helena Chemical Company, and Exxon Mobil Corp., successor to Mobil Chemical Co., Defendants. Case Number 2:06-CV-00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Civil Action Number 07-4037 Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010 Rosenfeld Trial: October 2010 In the District Court of Texas 21st Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Defendant. Case Number 25,151 Rosenfeld Trial: May 2009 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant. Case 3:10-cv-00622 Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013     Attachment 2 Reference Documentation  From:Areana Flores To:Annaliese Miller Subject:[EXT] RE: Question re: BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Date:Wednesday, June 17, 2020 9:37:20 AM Attachments:DD3C96CCED5B4CF0A6DB51518A727922.png B9044466E6C346219D456B5193CC60F1.png B14B09F4EBEB431FA3EAC8C68F745C0E[148192193].png 364DCC222DA44C6D8C445431C6CDB910[148192194].png 06A2005ACCF54BFABDC088396EFF9A5F[148192195].png B56CF85837254D718E6DB3FF0BDA9496[148192196].png 351B8557720743F1AED06DCEE8F2D056[148192197].png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Rincon Consultants. Be cautious before clicking on any links, or opening any attachments, until you are confident that the content is safe . Hi Annaliese, The pollutant listed is the pollutant that is the limiting factor. For instance, Table 3-1 shows a screening level of 56 dwelling units for single-family residential and it lists ROG as the limiting factor. This means that a project that consisted of one more single family home would result in an exceedance of the District’s mass emission threshold for ROG of 54 lb/day. Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, AREANA FLORES, MSc ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER Bay Area Air Quality Management District 375 Beale St. Suite 600 | San Francisco, CA 94105 415-749-4616 | aflores@baaqmd.gov From: Areana Flores Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:19 PM To: Annaliese Miller Subject: RE: Question re: BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Hi Annaliese, We are actually looking into the documentation. The staff that worked on this table are no longer here so I am working on getting an answer soon. Based on what is in the description I would say yes , the operational air quality impact for all criteria pollutants would be considered less than significant but I will confirm. Best, AREANA FLORES, MSc ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER Bay Area Air Quality Management District 375 Beale St. Suite 600 | San Francisco, CA 94105 415-749-4616 | aflores@baaqmd.gov From: Annaliese Miller Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 4:06 PM To: Areana Flores Subject: RE: Question re: BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Hi Areana, I just wanted to follow up on the question below. I wasn’t sure if you were the right person to reach out to since I’ve typically emailed you about HRAs, so feel free to forward this inquiry to another planner if needed! Annaliese Miller, Associate Environmental Planner Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists | Planners | Engineers 805-644-4455 x429 805-869-1323 Direct rinconconsultants.com   Ranked 2019 “Hot Firm” and “Best Firm to Work For” by Zweig Group From: Annaliese Miller Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:46 PM To: Areana Flores <aflores@baaqmd.gov> Subject: Question re: BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Hi Areana, I have a clarification question regarding Table 3-1 in the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines – for the operational criteria pollutant screening size, each project size is followed by a pollutant in parentheses. Can you please clarify what this pollutant in parentheses indicates? It is my understanding that regardless of what pollutant is indicated, if a project falls below the screening size, its operational air quality impact for all criteria pollutants is less than significant. Can you confirm that? Thank you! https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017- pdf.pdf?la=en Annaliese Miller, Associate Environmental Planner Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists | Planners | Engineers 805-644-4455 x429 805-869-1323 Direct rinconconsultants.com   Ranked 2019 “Hot Firm” and “Best Firm to Work For” by Zweig Group From:Leslie Brown To:Annaliese Miller Cc:info@peninsulacleanenergy.com Subject:Re: GHG Emissions Factor Date:Monday, November 25, 2019 2:47:22 PM Attachments:image001.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Rincon Consultants. Be cautious before clicking on any links, or opening any attachments, until you are confident that the content is safe . Hi Analiese- Our 2018 Emissions factor for ECOplus is 129.77 lbs CO2e/MWH. You can find more detailed information about our power resources, including copies of our annual Power Content Label, on our website. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Regards, Leslie Brown Director of Customer Care Peninsula Clean Energy lbrown@peninsulacleanenergy.com 650.260.0094 visit us at peninsulacleanenergy.com PCE is committed to protecting customer privacy. Learn more at: https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/privacy On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:40 PM Annaliese Miller <amiller@rinconconsultants.com> wrote: Hello! I am writing to inquire to see if you have an updated GHG emissions factor for electricity supplied by PCE that I can use for a GHG emissions analysis for a land use development project. I found the attached document online that references an emissions factor of 0.14226 lbs of CO2e per kWh but was not sure if that is still accurate. Thank you! Annaliese Miller, Associate Environmental Planner Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists | Planners | Engineers 805-644-4455 x429 805-869-1323 Direct rinconconsultants.com cid:image001.png@01D4A99F.8E3E78A0 Ranked 2019 “Hot Firm List” by Zweig Group     Attachment 3 Updated CalEEMod Worksheets  1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company User Defined 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 105.93 0CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 1 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Project Characteristics - Peninsula Clean Energy. Land Use - Based on project site plans. Construction Phase - Applicant provided schedule Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list. Grader used as proxy for excavator due to model limits. Trips and VMT - Applicant provided Demolition - Demolition of existing building Grading - Applicant-provided information Architectural Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3 Vehicle Trips - Based on TJKM traffic study. Area Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3. Energy Use - 30% reduction for 2019 Title 24 Standards Water And Wastewater - 20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen Mobile Land Use Mitigation - SamTrans ECR stop. Distance to downtown South SF. Energy Mitigation - 50 kW system Water Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 2 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 349.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 12.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 44.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 158.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.41 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 105.93 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,409,843.15 1,927,875.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 3 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.5328 37.5268 19.5330 0.0827 2.1883 0.9762 3.1240 0.4908 0.9282 1.4078 0.0000 8,557.167 2 8,557.167 2 0.8822 0.0000 8,579.221 6 2021 34.5592 21.5200 19.5215 0.0520 0.8728 0.8526 1.6926 0.2357 0.8003 1.0273 0.0000 5,068.831 5 5,068.831 5 1.0661 0.0000 5,095.484 8 2022 1.3531 12.9231 12.2547 0.0359 0.7578 0.4720 1.2298 0.2051 0.4473 0.6524 0.0000 3,522.405 7 3,522.405 7 0.6021 0.0000 3,537.457 6 Maximum 34.5592 37.5268 19.5330 0.0827 2.1883 0.9762 3.1240 0.4908 0.9282 1.4078 0.0000 8,557.167 2 8,557.167 2 1.0661 0.0000 8,579.221 6 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.5328 37.5268 19.5330 0.0827 2.1883 0.9762 3.1240 0.4908 0.9282 1.4078 0.0000 8,557.167 2 8,557.167 2 0.8822 0.0000 8,579.221 6 2021 34.5592 21.5200 19.5215 0.0520 0.8728 0.8526 1.6926 0.2357 0.8003 1.0273 0.0000 5,068.831 5 5,068.831 5 1.0661 0.0000 5,095.484 8 2022 1.3531 12.9231 12.2547 0.0359 0.7578 0.4720 1.2298 0.2051 0.4473 0.6524 0.0000 3,522.405 7 3,522.405 7 0.6021 0.0000 3,537.457 6 Maximum 34.5592 37.5268 19.5330 0.0827 2.1883 0.9762 3.1240 0.4908 0.9282 1.4078 0.0000 8,557.167 2 8,557.167 2 1.0661 0.0000 8,579.221 6 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 4 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 5 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 Total 4.4108 5.3533 11.2679 0.0421 3.1403 0.1314 3.2718 0.8401 0.1295 0.9697 5,066.127 1 5,066.127 1 0.1607 0.0298 5,079.012 8 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 0.7987 3.3546 7.7178 0.0228 2.0139 0.0199 2.0338 0.5388 0.0185 0.5573 2,314.310 8 2,314.310 8 0.0986 2,316.775 9 Total 4.3084 4.7075 8.8710 0.0310 2.0139 0.1227 2.1366 0.5388 0.1214 0.6602 3,937.615 3 3,937.615 3 0.1298 0.0298 3,949.729 0 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 6 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 11/1/2020 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2020 12/1/2020 5 22 3 Grading Grading 12/1/2020 12/15/2020 5 11 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/15/2020 4/15/2022 5 349 5 Paving Paving 1/15/2021 2/1/2021 5 12 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/1/2021 12/1/2021 5 44 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.32 12.06 21.27 26.50 35.87 6.61 34.69 35.87 6.27 31.92 0.00 22.28 22.28 19.22 0.00 22.23 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 7 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 158 0.38 Site Preparation Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Site Preparation Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Grading Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 7.00 132 0.36 Paving Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Paving Surfacing Equipment 1 8.00 263 0.30 Architectural Coating Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 8 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0895 0.0000 0.0895 0.0136 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.2307 0.2307 0.2133 0.2133 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Total 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.0895 0.2307 0.3202 0.0136 0.2133 0.2269 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 3 8.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 6 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 9 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 3.4700e- 003 0.1201 0.0251 3.2000e- 004 7.1500e- 003 3.9000e- 004 7.5400e- 003 1.9600e- 003 3.7000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 34.2202 34.2202 1.8300e- 003 34.2659 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0294 0.0208 0.2016 6.1000e- 004 0.0657 4.3000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.9000e- 004 0.0178 60.4852 60.4852 1.4800e- 003 60.5222 Total 0.0329 0.1409 0.2267 9.3000e- 004 0.0729 8.2000e- 004 0.0737 0.0194 7.6000e- 004 0.0202 94.7054 94.7054 3.3100e- 003 94.7881 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0895 0.0000 0.0895 0.0136 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.2307 0.2307 0.2133 0.2133 0.0000 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Total 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.0895 0.2307 0.3202 0.0136 0.2133 0.2269 0.0000 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 10 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 3.4700e- 003 0.1201 0.0251 3.2000e- 004 7.1500e- 003 3.9000e- 004 7.5400e- 003 1.9600e- 003 3.7000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 34.2202 34.2202 1.8300e- 003 34.2659 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0294 0.0208 0.2016 6.1000e- 004 0.0657 4.3000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.9000e- 004 0.0178 60.4852 60.4852 1.4800e- 003 60.5222 Total 0.0329 0.1409 0.2267 9.3000e- 004 0.0729 8.2000e- 004 0.0737 0.0194 7.6000e- 004 0.0202 94.7054 94.7054 3.3100e- 003 94.7881 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5986 0.0000 0.5986 0.0676 0.0000 0.0676 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.6315 0.6315 0.5947 0.5947 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Total 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.5986 0.6315 1.2301 0.0676 0.5947 0.6623 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 11 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6408 22.1840 4.6327 0.0591 1.3206 0.0720 1.3926 0.3619 0.0689 0.4308 6,323.131 0 6,323.131 0 0.3379 6,331.578 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0478 0.0338 0.3276 9.9000e- 004 0.1068 6.9000e- 004 0.1075 0.0283 6.4000e- 004 0.0290 98.2885 98.2885 2.4000e- 003 98.3486 Total 0.6886 22.2178 4.9603 0.0601 1.4273 0.0727 1.5000 0.3902 0.0695 0.4597 6,421.419 5 6,421.419 5 0.3403 6,429.926 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5986 0.0000 0.5986 0.0676 0.0000 0.0676 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.6315 0.6315 0.5947 0.5947 0.0000 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Total 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.5986 0.6315 1.2301 0.0676 0.5947 0.6623 0.0000 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 12 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6408 22.1840 4.6327 0.0591 1.3206 0.0720 1.3926 0.3619 0.0689 0.4308 6,323.131 0 6,323.131 0 0.3379 6,331.578 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0478 0.0338 0.3276 9.9000e- 004 0.1068 6.9000e- 004 0.1075 0.0283 6.4000e- 004 0.0290 98.2885 98.2885 2.4000e- 003 98.3486 Total 0.6886 22.2178 4.9603 0.0601 1.4273 0.0727 1.5000 0.3902 0.0695 0.4597 6,421.419 5 6,421.419 5 0.3403 6,429.926 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.2715 0.2715 0.2635 0.2635 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Total 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.0000 0.2715 0.2715 0.0000 0.2635 0.2635 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 13 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.2715 0.2715 0.2635 0.2635 0.0000 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Total 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.0000 0.2715 0.2715 0.0000 0.2635 0.2635 0.0000 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 14 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Total 0.0368 0.0260 0.2520 7.6000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 75.6065 75.6065 1.8500e- 003 75.6528 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Total 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 15 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1077 3.1114 0.8397 7.2500e- 003 0.1828 0.0153 0.1981 0.0526 0.0147 0.0673 767.6836 767.6836 0.0420 768.7324 Worker 0.2574 0.1820 1.7639 5.3100e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 529.2458 529.2458 0.0129 529.5694 Total 0.3651 3.2934 2.6036 0.0126 0.7578 0.0191 0.7769 0.2051 0.0181 0.2232 1,296.929 3 1,296.929 3 0.0549 1,298.301 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 0.0000 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Total 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 0.0000 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 16 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1077 3.1114 0.8397 7.2500e- 003 0.1828 0.0153 0.1981 0.0526 0.0147 0.0673 767.6836 767.6836 0.0420 768.7324 Worker 0.2574 0.1820 1.7639 5.3100e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 529.2458 529.2458 0.0129 529.5694 Total 0.3651 3.2934 2.6036 0.0126 0.7578 0.0191 0.7769 0.2051 0.0181 0.2232 1,296.929 3 1,296.929 3 0.0549 1,298.301 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Total 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 17 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0887 2.8142 0.7563 7.1800e- 003 0.1828 6.2600e- 003 0.1890 0.0526 5.9800e- 003 0.0586 760.3933 760.3933 0.0396 761.3837 Worker 0.2384 0.1625 1.6087 5.1200e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 510.6757 510.6757 0.0116 510.9645 Total 0.3271 2.9767 2.3649 0.0123 0.7578 9.8800e- 003 0.7677 0.2051 9.3100e- 003 0.2145 1,271.069 0 1,271.069 0 0.0512 1,272.348 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 0.0000 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Total 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 0.0000 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 18 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0887 2.8142 0.7563 7.1800e- 003 0.1828 6.2600e- 003 0.1890 0.0526 5.9800e- 003 0.0586 760.3933 760.3933 0.0396 761.3837 Worker 0.2384 0.1625 1.6087 5.1200e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 510.6757 510.6757 0.0116 510.9645 Total 0.3271 2.9767 2.3649 0.0123 0.7578 9.8800e- 003 0.7677 0.2051 9.3100e- 003 0.2145 1,271.069 0 1,271.069 0 0.0512 1,272.348 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Total 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 19 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0827 2.6643 0.7109 7.1000e- 003 0.1828 5.4300e- 003 0.1882 0.0526 5.1900e- 003 0.0578 752.8650 752.8650 0.0378 753.8111 Worker 0.2226 0.1457 1.4762 4.9300e- 003 0.5750 3.5300e- 003 0.5786 0.1525 3.2500e- 003 0.1558 491.9544 491.9544 0.0104 492.2131 Total 0.3053 2.8100 2.1871 0.0120 0.7578 8.9600e- 003 0.7668 0.2051 8.4400e- 003 0.2136 1,244.819 5 1,244.819 5 0.0482 1,246.024 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 0.0000 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Total 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 0.0000 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 20 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0827 2.6643 0.7109 7.1000e- 003 0.1828 5.4300e- 003 0.1882 0.0526 5.1900e- 003 0.0578 752.8650 752.8650 0.0378 753.8111 Worker 0.2226 0.1457 1.4762 4.9300e- 003 0.5750 3.5300e- 003 0.5786 0.1525 3.2500e- 003 0.1558 491.9544 491.9544 0.0104 492.2131 Total 0.3053 2.8100 2.1871 0.0120 0.7578 8.9600e- 003 0.7668 0.2051 8.4400e- 003 0.2136 1,244.819 5 1,244.819 5 0.0482 1,246.024 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 21 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0341 0.0232 0.2298 7.3000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 72.9537 72.9537 1.6500e- 003 72.9949 Total 0.0341 0.0232 0.2298 7.3000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 72.9537 72.9537 1.6500e- 003 72.9949 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 0.0000 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 0.0000 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 22 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0341 0.0232 0.2298 7.3000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 72.9537 72.9537 1.6500e- 003 72.9949 Total 0.0341 0.0232 0.2298 7.3000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 72.9537 72.9537 1.6500e- 003 72.9949 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.9634 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0574 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Total 33.0207 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 23 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Total 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.9634 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0574 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Total 33.0207 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 24 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Total 0.0477 0.0325 0.3217 1.0200e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 102.1351 102.1351 2.3100e- 003 102.1929 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 25 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.7987 3.3546 7.7178 0.0228 2.0139 0.0199 2.0338 0.5388 0.0185 0.5573 2,314.310 8 2,314.310 8 0.0986 2,316.775 9 Unmitigated 0.9011 4.0004 10.1146 0.0340 3.1403 0.0286 3.1689 0.8401 0.0267 0.8668 3,442.822 6 3,442.822 6 0.1295 3,446.059 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 26 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 27 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13797.8 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13.7978 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 28 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 29 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 30 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:05 AMPage 31 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company User Defined 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 105.93 0CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 1 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Project Characteristics - Peninsula Clean Energy. Land Use - Based on project site plans. Construction Phase - Applicant provided schedule Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list. Grader used as proxy for excavator due to model limits. Trips and VMT - Applicant provided Demolition - Demolition of existing building Grading - Applicant-provided information Architectural Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3 Vehicle Trips - Based on TJKM traffic study. Area Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3. Energy Use - 30% reduction for 2019 Title 24 Standards Water And Wastewater - 20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen Mobile Land Use Mitigation - SamTrans ECR stop. Distance to downtown South SF. Energy Mitigation - 50 kW system Water Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 2 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 349.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 12.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 44.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 158.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.41 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 105.93 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,409,843.15 1,927,875.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 3 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.5111 36.9822 19.2361 0.0839 2.1883 0.9750 3.1227 0.4908 0.9270 1.4066 0.0000 8,679.360 4 8,679.360 4 0.8662 0.0000 8,701.015 0 2021 34.5382 21.4607 19.5497 0.0527 0.8728 0.8524 1.6924 0.2357 0.8001 1.0271 0.0000 5,138.564 5 5,138.564 5 1.0641 0.0000 5,165.166 8 2022 1.3354 12.8754 12.2707 0.0365 0.7578 0.4718 1.2296 0.2051 0.4471 0.6523 0.0000 3,584.203 2 3,584.203 2 0.6000 0.0000 3,599.203 8 Maximum 34.5382 36.9822 19.5497 0.0839 2.1883 0.9750 3.1227 0.4908 0.9270 1.4066 0.0000 8,679.360 4 8,679.360 4 1.0641 0.0000 8,701.015 0 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.5111 36.9822 19.2361 0.0839 2.1883 0.9750 3.1227 0.4908 0.9270 1.4066 0.0000 8,679.360 4 8,679.360 4 0.8662 0.0000 8,701.015 0 2021 34.5382 21.4607 19.5497 0.0527 0.8728 0.8524 1.6924 0.2357 0.8001 1.0271 0.0000 5,138.564 5 5,138.564 5 1.0641 0.0000 5,165.166 8 2022 1.3354 12.8754 12.2707 0.0365 0.7578 0.4718 1.2296 0.2051 0.4471 0.6523 0.0000 3,584.203 2 3,584.203 2 0.6000 0.0000 3,599.203 8 Maximum 34.5382 36.9822 19.5497 0.0839 2.1883 0.9750 3.1227 0.4908 0.9270 1.4066 0.0000 8,679.360 4 8,679.360 4 1.0641 0.0000 8,701.015 0 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 4 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 5 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 Total 4.5660 5.1789 11.0358 0.0444 3.1403 0.1313 3.2716 0.8401 0.1294 0.9695 5,300.939 3 5,300.939 3 0.1572 0.0298 5,313.737 3 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Energy 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mobile 0.9525 3.2462 7.1887 0.0244 2.0139 0.0197 2.0336 0.5388 0.0184 0.5572 2,475.239 9 2,475.239 9 0.0937 2,477.582 4 Total 4.4622 4.5991 8.3419 0.0325 2.0139 0.1226 2.1365 0.5388 0.1213 0.6600 4,098.544 4 4,098.544 4 0.1249 0.0298 4,110.535 5 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 6 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 11/1/2020 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2020 12/1/2020 5 22 3 Grading Grading 12/1/2020 12/15/2020 5 11 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/15/2020 4/15/2022 5 349 5 Paving Paving 1/15/2021 2/1/2021 5 12 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/1/2021 12/1/2021 5 44 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.27 11.19 24.41 26.78 35.87 6.61 34.70 35.87 6.28 31.92 0.00 22.68 22.68 20.53 0.00 22.64 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 7 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 158 0.38 Site Preparation Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Site Preparation Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Grading Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 7.00 132 0.36 Paving Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Paving Surfacing Equipment 1 8.00 263 0.30 Architectural Coating Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 8 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0895 0.0000 0.0895 0.0136 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.2307 0.2307 0.2133 0.2133 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Total 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.0895 0.2307 0.3202 0.0136 0.2133 0.2269 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 3 8.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 6 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 9 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 3.3800e- 003 0.1172 0.0233 3.3000e- 004 7.1500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 1.9600e- 003 3.7000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 34.8048 34.8048 1.7400e- 003 34.8483 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0278 0.0168 0.2146 6.6000e- 004 0.0657 4.3000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.9000e- 004 0.0178 65.6621 65.6621 1.5800e- 003 65.7017 Total 0.0312 0.1340 0.2379 9.9000e- 004 0.0729 8.1000e- 004 0.0737 0.0194 7.6000e- 004 0.0201 100.4669 100.4669 3.3200e- 003 100.5500 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0895 0.0000 0.0895 0.0136 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.2307 0.2307 0.2133 0.2133 0.0000 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Total 0.4595 4.3509 5.2786 8.1900e- 003 0.0895 0.2307 0.3202 0.0136 0.2133 0.2269 0.0000 775.0084 775.0084 0.2398 781.0040 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 10 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 3.3800e- 003 0.1172 0.0233 3.3000e- 004 7.1500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 1.9600e- 003 3.7000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 34.8048 34.8048 1.7400e- 003 34.8483 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0278 0.0168 0.2146 6.6000e- 004 0.0657 4.3000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.9000e- 004 0.0178 65.6621 65.6621 1.5800e- 003 65.7017 Total 0.0312 0.1340 0.2379 9.9000e- 004 0.0729 8.1000e- 004 0.0737 0.0194 7.6000e- 004 0.0201 100.4669 100.4669 3.3200e- 003 100.5500 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5986 0.0000 0.5986 0.0676 0.0000 0.0676 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.6315 0.6315 0.5947 0.5947 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Total 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.5986 0.6315 1.2301 0.0676 0.5947 0.6623 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 11 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6237 21.6526 4.3033 0.0601 1.3206 0.0708 1.3913 0.3619 0.0677 0.4296 6,431.150 2 6,431.150 2 0.3217 6,439.193 2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0452 0.0274 0.3488 1.0700e- 003 0.1068 6.9000e- 004 0.1075 0.0283 6.4000e- 004 0.0290 106.7010 106.7010 2.5700e- 003 106.7652 Total 0.6689 21.6800 4.6521 0.0612 1.4273 0.0715 1.4988 0.3902 0.0684 0.4586 6,537.851 1 6,537.851 1 0.3243 6,545.958 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5986 0.0000 0.5986 0.0676 0.0000 0.0676 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.6315 0.6315 0.5947 0.5947 0.0000 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Total 1.2300 10.8173 9.0675 0.0135 0.5986 0.6315 1.2301 0.0676 0.5947 0.6623 0.0000 1,266.034 0 1,266.034 0 0.2988 1,273.502 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 12 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6237 21.6526 4.3033 0.0601 1.3206 0.0708 1.3913 0.3619 0.0677 0.4296 6,431.150 2 6,431.150 2 0.3217 6,439.193 2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0452 0.0274 0.3488 1.0700e- 003 0.1068 6.9000e- 004 0.1075 0.0283 6.4000e- 004 0.0290 106.7010 106.7010 2.5700e- 003 106.7652 Total 0.6689 21.6800 4.6521 0.0612 1.4273 0.0715 1.4988 0.3902 0.0684 0.4586 6,537.851 1 6,537.851 1 0.3243 6,545.958 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.2715 0.2715 0.2635 0.2635 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Total 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.0000 0.2715 0.2715 0.0000 0.2635 0.2635 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 13 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.2715 0.2715 0.2635 0.2635 0.0000 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Total 0.5775 4.4347 4.6632 7.4700e- 003 0.0000 0.2715 0.2715 0.0000 0.2635 0.2635 0.0000 684.6334 684.6334 0.1107 687.4011 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 14 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Total 0.0348 0.0210 0.2683 8.2000e- 004 0.0822 5.3000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.9000e- 004 0.0223 82.0777 82.0777 1.9800e- 003 82.1271 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Total 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 15 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1024 3.0770 0.7340 7.4400e- 003 0.1828 0.0151 0.1978 0.0526 0.0144 0.0670 787.6117 787.6117 0.0388 788.5814 Worker 0.2433 0.1473 1.8781 5.7700e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 574.5436 574.5436 0.0138 574.8897 Total 0.3457 3.2243 2.6121 0.0132 0.7578 0.0188 0.7766 0.2051 0.0179 0.2230 1,362.155 3 1,362.155 3 0.0526 1,363.471 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 0.0000 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Total 1.2781 13.1343 10.3099 0.0238 0.6285 0.6285 0.5950 0.5950 0.0000 2,273.341 4 2,273.341 4 0.5580 2,287.291 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 16 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1024 3.0770 0.7340 7.4400e- 003 0.1828 0.0151 0.1978 0.0526 0.0144 0.0670 787.6117 787.6117 0.0388 788.5814 Worker 0.2433 0.1473 1.8781 5.7700e- 003 0.5750 3.7200e- 003 0.5788 0.1525 3.4300e- 003 0.1560 574.5436 574.5436 0.0138 574.8897 Total 0.3457 3.2243 2.6121 0.0132 0.7578 0.0188 0.7766 0.2051 0.0179 0.2230 1,362.155 3 1,362.155 3 0.0526 1,363.471 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Total 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 17 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0837 2.7902 0.6580 7.3600e- 003 0.1828 6.0500e- 003 0.1888 0.0526 5.7800e- 003 0.0584 780.1881 780.1881 0.0366 781.1035 Worker 0.2251 0.1315 1.7194 5.5600e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 554.3717 554.3717 0.0124 554.6815 Total 0.3088 2.9218 2.3774 0.0129 0.7578 9.6700e- 003 0.7675 0.2051 9.1100e- 003 0.2143 1,334.559 7 1,334.559 7 0.0490 1,335.785 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 0.0000 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Total 1.1636 11.7532 10.1873 0.0238 0.5463 0.5463 0.5172 0.5172 0.0000 2,275.703 1 2,275.703 1 0.5555 2,289.589 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 18 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0837 2.7902 0.6580 7.3600e- 003 0.1828 6.0500e- 003 0.1888 0.0526 5.7800e- 003 0.0584 780.1881 780.1881 0.0366 781.1035 Worker 0.2251 0.1315 1.7194 5.5600e- 003 0.5750 3.6200e- 003 0.5787 0.1525 3.3300e- 003 0.1559 554.3717 554.3717 0.0124 554.6815 Total 0.3088 2.9218 2.3774 0.0129 0.7578 9.6700e- 003 0.7675 0.2051 9.1100e- 003 0.2143 1,334.559 7 1,334.559 7 0.0490 1,335.785 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Total 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 19 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0781 2.6444 0.6188 7.2900e- 003 0.1828 5.2400e- 003 0.1880 0.0526 5.0100e- 003 0.0576 772.5902 772.5902 0.0350 773.4654 Worker 0.2095 0.1180 1.5844 5.3600e- 003 0.5750 3.5300e- 003 0.5786 0.1525 3.2500e- 003 0.1558 534.0268 534.0268 0.0111 534.3050 Total 0.2876 2.7624 2.2031 0.0127 0.7578 8.7700e- 003 0.7666 0.2051 8.2600e- 003 0.2134 1,306.616 9 1,306.616 9 0.0461 1,307.770 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 0.0000 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Total 1.0479 10.1130 10.0675 0.0239 0.4630 0.4630 0.4389 0.4389 0.0000 2,277.586 3 2,277.586 3 0.5539 2,291.433 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 20 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0781 2.6444 0.6188 7.2900e- 003 0.1828 5.2400e- 003 0.1880 0.0526 5.0100e- 003 0.0576 772.5902 772.5902 0.0350 773.4654 Worker 0.2095 0.1180 1.5844 5.3600e- 003 0.5750 3.5300e- 003 0.5786 0.1525 3.2500e- 003 0.1558 534.0268 534.0268 0.0111 534.3050 Total 0.2876 2.7624 2.2031 0.0127 0.7578 8.7700e- 003 0.7666 0.2051 8.2600e- 003 0.2134 1,306.616 9 1,306.616 9 0.0461 1,307.770 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 21 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0322 0.0188 0.2456 7.9000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 79.1960 79.1960 1.7700e- 003 79.2402 Total 0.0322 0.0188 0.2456 7.9000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 79.1960 79.1960 1.7700e- 003 79.2402 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 0.0000 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6368 6.7670 6.7395 0.0152 0.2959 0.2959 0.2734 0.2734 0.0000 1,449.105 8 1,449.105 8 0.4578 1,460.551 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 22 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0322 0.0188 0.2456 7.9000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 79.1960 79.1960 1.7700e- 003 79.2402 Total 0.0322 0.0188 0.2456 7.9000e- 004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 79.1960 79.1960 1.7700e- 003 79.2402 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.9634 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0574 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Total 33.0207 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 23 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Total 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.9634 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0574 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Total 33.0207 0.3594 0.3010 6.9000e- 004 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 49.3136 49.3136 5.1200e- 003 49.4415 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 24 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Total 0.0450 0.0263 0.3439 1.1100e- 003 0.1150 7.2000e- 004 0.1157 0.0305 6.7000e- 004 0.0312 110.8743 110.8743 2.4800e- 003 110.9363 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 25 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.9525 3.2462 7.1887 0.0244 2.0139 0.0197 2.0336 0.5388 0.0184 0.5572 2,475.239 9 2,475.239 9 0.0937 2,477.582 4 Unmitigated 1.0563 3.8260 9.8825 0.0363 3.1403 0.0284 3.1687 0.8401 0.0265 0.8666 3,677.634 8 3,677.634 8 0.1260 3,680.784 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 26 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 27 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13797.8 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 13.7978 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Total 0.1488 1.3527 1.1363 8.1200e- 003 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 0.1028 1,623.268 1 1,623.268 1 0.0311 0.0298 1,632.914 4 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 28 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 29 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.3974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.9620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.5700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Total 3.3609 1.5000e- 004 0.0170 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0363 0.0363 1.0000e- 004 0.0387 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 30 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:07 AMPage 31 of 31 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company User Defined 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 105.93 0CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 1 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Peninsula Clean Energy. Land Use - Based on project site plans. Construction Phase - Applicant provided schedule Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list. Grader used as proxy for excavator due to model limits. Trips and VMT - Applicant provided Demolition - Demolition of existing building Grading - Applicant-provided information Architectural Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3 Vehicle Trips - Based on TJKM traffic study. Area Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3. Energy Use - 30% reduction for 2019 Title 24 Standards Water And Wastewater - 20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen Mobile Land Use Mitigation - SamTrans ECR stop. Distance to downtown South SF. Energy Mitigation - 50 kW system Water Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 2 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 349.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 12.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 44.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 158.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.41 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 105.93 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,409,843.15 1,927,875.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 3 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0402 0.5430 0.3229 1.2000e- 003 0.0287 0.0160 0.0447 6.6700e- 003 0.0151 0.0218 0.0000 110.9824 110.9824 0.0129 0.0000 111.3043 2021 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1458 433.1458 0.0743 0.0000 435.0026 2022 0.0498 0.4844 0.4565 1.3500e- 003 0.0274 0.0177 0.0451 7.4400e- 003 0.0168 0.0242 0.0000 120.3752 120.3752 0.0204 0.0000 120.8859 Maximum 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1458 433.1458 0.0743 0.0000 435.0026 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0402 0.5430 0.3229 1.2000e- 003 0.0287 0.0160 0.0447 6.6700e- 003 0.0151 0.0218 0.0000 110.9823 110.9823 0.0129 0.0000 111.3042 2021 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1455 433.1455 0.0743 0.0000 435.0023 2022 0.0498 0.4844 0.4565 1.3500e- 003 0.0274 0.0177 0.0451 7.4400e- 003 0.0168 0.0242 0.0000 120.3751 120.3751 0.0204 0.0000 120.8858 Maximum 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1455 433.1455 0.0743 0.0000 435.0023 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 4 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 0.5809 0.5809 2 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 0.5693 0.5693 3 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 0.5248 0.5248 4 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 0.5306 0.5306 5 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 1.2739 1.2739 6 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.4589 0.4589 7 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 0.0761 0.0761 Highest 1.2739 1.2739 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 5 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 326.5222 326.5222 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 328.1192 Mobile 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6116 0.5463 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Total 0.7394 0.6745 1.2535 5.2100e- 003 0.3286 0.0219 0.3504 0.0882 0.0217 0.1098 11.1692 670.0332 681.2024 0.7043 6.4100e- 003 700.7209 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 6 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 321.6907 321.6907 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 323.2878 Mobile 0.0880 0.3604 0.7850 2.5100e- 003 0.2107 2.1500e- 003 0.2129 0.0566 2.0000e- 003 0.0586 0.0000 231.0145 231.0145 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 231.2487 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6116 0.5435 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Total 0.7284 0.6072 0.9939 3.9900e- 003 0.2107 0.0209 0.2316 0.0566 0.0208 0.0773 11.1692 553.2518 564.4209 0.7013 6.4100e- 003 583.8632 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 1.49 9.97 20.70 23.42 35.87 4.30 33.90 35.87 4.06 29.60 0.00 17.43 17.14 0.43 0.00 16.68 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 7 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 11/1/2020 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2020 12/1/2020 5 22 3 Grading Grading 12/1/2020 12/15/2020 5 11 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/15/2020 4/15/2022 5 349 5 Paving Paving 1/15/2021 2/1/2021 5 12 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/1/2021 12/1/2021 5 44 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 8 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 158 0.38 Site Preparation Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Site Preparation Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Grading Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 7.00 132 0.36 Paving Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Paving Surfacing Equipment 1 8.00 263 0.30 Architectural Coating Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 9 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Total 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 3.5200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 3 8.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 6 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 10 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6092 0.6092 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6096 Total 3.3000e- 004 1.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 7.8000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9549 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Total 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 3.5200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 11 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6092 0.6092 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6096 Total 3.3000e- 004 1.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 7.8000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9549 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.5800e- 003 0.0000 6.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.9500e- 003 6.9500e- 003 6.5400e- 003 6.5400e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Total 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 6.9500e- 003 0.0135 7.4000e- 004 6.5400e- 003 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 12 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9900 0.9900 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9906 Total 7.4100e- 003 0.2434 0.0524 6.7000e- 004 0.0152 7.9000e- 004 0.0160 4.1600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 64.7139 64.7139 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 64.7965 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.5800e- 003 0.0000 6.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.9500e- 003 6.9500e- 003 6.5400e- 003 6.5400e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Total 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 6.9500e- 003 0.0135 7.4000e- 004 6.5400e- 003 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 13 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9900 0.9900 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9906 Total 7.4100e- 003 0.2434 0.0524 6.7000e- 004 0.0152 7.9000e- 004 0.0160 4.1600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 64.7139 64.7139 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 64.7965 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Total 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 14 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Total 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 15 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Total 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 16 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8000e- 004 0.0203 5.0900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.5949 4.5949 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.6009 Worker 1.5100e- 003 1.0800e- 003 0.0112 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.6200e- 003 9.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.1499 3.1499 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1518 Total 2.1900e- 003 0.0213 0.0163 8.0000e- 005 4.7500e- 003 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.4100e- 003 0.0000 7.7448 7.7448 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7526 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Total 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 17 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8000e- 004 0.0203 5.0900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.5949 4.5949 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.6009 Worker 1.5100e- 003 1.0800e- 003 0.0112 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.6200e- 003 9.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.1499 3.1499 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1518 Total 2.1900e- 003 0.0213 0.0163 8.0000e- 005 4.7500e- 003 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.4100e- 003 0.0000 7.7448 7.7448 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7526 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4151 269.4151 0.0658 0.0000 271.0591 Total 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4151 269.4151 0.0658 0.0000 271.0591 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 18 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3680 0.0919 9.5000e- 004 0.0231 8.0000e- 004 0.0239 6.6800e- 003 7.7000e- 004 7.4500e- 003 0.0000 91.3798 91.3798 4.4900e- 003 0.0000 91.4922 Worker 0.0280 0.0193 0.2049 6.7000e- 004 0.0722 4.7000e- 004 0.0727 0.0192 4.3000e- 004 0.0196 0.0000 61.0209 61.0209 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 61.0551 Total 0.0392 0.3874 0.2968 1.6200e- 003 0.0953 1.2700e- 003 0.0966 0.0259 1.2000e- 003 0.0271 0.0000 152.4007 152.4007 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 152.5473 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4147 269.4147 0.0658 0.0000 271.0588 Total 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4147 269.4147 0.0658 0.0000 271.0588 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 19 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3680 0.0919 9.5000e- 004 0.0231 8.0000e- 004 0.0239 6.6800e- 003 7.7000e- 004 7.4500e- 003 0.0000 91.3798 91.3798 4.4900e- 003 0.0000 91.4922 Worker 0.0280 0.0193 0.2049 6.7000e- 004 0.0722 4.7000e- 004 0.0727 0.0192 4.3000e- 004 0.0196 0.0000 61.0209 61.0209 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 61.0551 Total 0.0392 0.3874 0.2968 1.6200e- 003 0.0953 1.2700e- 003 0.0966 0.0259 1.2000e- 003 0.0271 0.0000 152.4007 152.4007 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 152.5473 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4822 77.4822 0.0188 0.0000 77.9533 Total 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4822 77.4822 0.0188 0.0000 77.9533 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 20 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.0000e- 003 0.1002 0.0248 2.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 1.9200e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.1100e- 003 0.0000 26.0011 26.0011 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 26.0319 Worker 7.5100e- 003 4.9800e- 003 0.0541 1.9000e- 004 0.0207 1.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.5200e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 0.0000 16.8919 16.8919 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.9007 Total 0.0105 0.1051 0.0789 4.6000e- 004 0.0274 3.3000e- 004 0.0277 7.4400e- 003 3.1000e- 004 7.7500e- 003 0.0000 42.8930 42.8930 1.5800e- 003 0.0000 42.9326 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4821 77.4821 0.0188 0.0000 77.9532 Total 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4821 77.4821 0.0188 0.0000 77.9532 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 21 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.0000e- 003 0.1002 0.0248 2.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 1.9200e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.1100e- 003 0.0000 26.0011 26.0011 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 26.0319 Worker 7.5100e- 003 4.9800e- 003 0.0541 1.9000e- 004 0.0207 1.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.5200e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 0.0000 16.8919 16.8919 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.9007 Total 0.0105 0.1051 0.0789 4.6000e- 004 0.0274 3.3000e- 004 0.0277 7.4400e- 003 3.1000e- 004 7.7500e- 003 0.0000 42.8930 42.8930 1.5800e- 003 0.0000 42.9326 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 22 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 23 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2600e- 003 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Total 0.7265 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 24 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Total 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2600e- 003 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Total 0.7265 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 25 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Total 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 26 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0880 0.3604 0.7850 2.5100e- 003 0.2107 2.1500e- 003 0.2129 0.0566 2.0000e- 003 0.0586 0.0000 231.0145 231.0145 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 231.2487 Unmitigated 0.0991 0.4276 1.0446 3.7300e- 003 0.3286 3.0900e- 003 0.3317 0.0882 2.8800e- 003 0.0911 0.0000 342.9618 342.9618 0.0124 0.0000 343.2722 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 Hotel 0.578638 0.038775 0.193686 0.110919 0.015677 0.005341 0.018293 0.026358 0.002641 0.002200 0.005832 0.000891 0.000749 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 27 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 52.9405 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 57.7719 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 28 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 29 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 166424 7.9965 0.0000 0.0000 7.9965 Hotel 1.03593e +006 49.7754 0.0000 0.0000 49.7754 Total 57.7719 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 121424 5.8343 0.0000 0.0000 5.8343 Hotel 980377 47.1062 0.0000 0.0000 47.1062 Total 52.9405 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 30 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 31 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 32 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Unmitigated 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.92788 / 0.26776 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Total 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 33 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.92788 / 0.251427 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Total 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 34 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 35 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 9:09 AMPage 36 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 71.00 Space 0.00 28,400.00 0 Hotel 95.00 Room 0.46 137,940.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company User Defined 2030Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 105.93 0CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 840 El Camino Real Hotel Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 1 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Peninsula Clean Energy. Land Use - Based on project site plans. Construction Phase - Applicant provided schedule Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list Off-road Equipment - Applicant-provided list. Grader used as proxy for excavator due to model limits. Trips and VMT - Applicant provided Demolition - Demolition of existing building Grading - Applicant-provided information Architectural Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3 Vehicle Trips - Based on TJKM traffic study. Area Coating - Consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3. Energy Use - 30% reduction for 2019 Title 24 Standards Water And Wastewater - 20% reduction for 2016 CALGreen Mobile Land Use Mitigation - SamTrans ECR stop. Distance to downtown South SF. Energy Mitigation - 50 kW system Water Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 2 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 349.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 12.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 44.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.19 1.53 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 13,300.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.64 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.17 0.46 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 158.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.41 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 105.93 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.02 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,409,843.15 1,927,875.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 3 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0402 0.5430 0.3229 1.2000e- 003 0.0287 0.0160 0.0447 6.6700e- 003 0.0151 0.0218 0.0000 110.9824 110.9824 0.0129 0.0000 111.3043 2021 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1458 433.1458 0.0743 0.0000 435.0026 2022 0.0498 0.4844 0.4565 1.3500e- 003 0.0274 0.0177 0.0451 7.4400e- 003 0.0168 0.0242 0.0000 120.3752 120.3752 0.0204 0.0000 120.8859 Maximum 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1458 433.1458 0.0743 0.0000 435.0026 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0402 0.5430 0.3229 1.2000e- 003 0.0287 0.0160 0.0447 6.6700e- 003 0.0151 0.0218 0.0000 110.9823 110.9823 0.0129 0.0000 111.3042 2021 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1455 433.1455 0.0743 0.0000 435.0023 2022 0.0498 0.4844 0.4565 1.3500e- 003 0.0274 0.0177 0.0451 7.4400e- 003 0.0168 0.0242 0.0000 120.3751 120.3751 0.0204 0.0000 120.8858 Maximum 0.9225 1.9705 1.6815 4.8700e- 003 0.0982 0.0747 0.1729 0.0267 0.0707 0.0973 0.0000 433.1455 433.1455 0.0743 0.0000 435.0023 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 4 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 0.5809 0.5809 2 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 0.5693 0.5693 3 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 0.5248 0.5248 4 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 0.5306 0.5306 5 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 1.2739 1.2739 6 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.4589 0.4589 7 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 0.0761 0.0761 Highest 1.2739 1.2739 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 5 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 326.5222 326.5222 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 328.1192 Mobile 0.0693 0.3579 0.7161 3.1200e- 003 0.3283 2.1000e- 003 0.3304 0.0881 1.9600e- 003 0.0900 0.0000 288.5506 288.5506 9.4900e- 003 0.0000 288.7879 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6116 0.5463 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Total 0.7097 0.6048 0.9250 4.6000e- 003 0.3283 0.0209 0.3492 0.0881 0.0207 0.1088 11.1692 615.6220 626.7912 0.7014 6.4100e- 003 646.2366 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 6 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Energy 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 321.6907 321.6907 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 323.2878 Mobile 0.0609 0.3128 0.5327 2.1100e- 003 0.2106 1.4800e- 003 0.2120 0.0565 1.3800e- 003 0.0579 0.0000 195.2684 195.2684 7.1300e- 003 0.0000 195.4466 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.5576 0.0000 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6116 0.5435 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Total 0.7013 0.5597 0.7416 3.5900e- 003 0.2106 0.0203 0.2308 0.0565 0.0202 0.0766 11.1692 517.5056 528.6748 0.6990 6.4100e- 003 548.0612 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 1.18 7.47 19.82 21.96 35.87 2.97 33.91 35.87 2.80 29.57 0.00 15.94 15.65 0.34 0.00 15.19 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 7 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2020 11/1/2020 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2020 12/1/2020 5 22 3 Grading Grading 12/1/2020 12/15/2020 5 11 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/15/2020 4/15/2022 5 349 5 Paving Paving 1/15/2021 2/1/2021 5 12 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/1/2021 12/1/2021 5 44 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 206,910; Non-Residential Outdoor: 68,970; Striped Parking Area: 1,704 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 8 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 158 0.38 Site Preparation Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Site Preparation Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43 Grading Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 7.00 132 0.36 Paving Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Paving Surfacing Equipment 1 8.00 263 0.30 Architectural Coating Signal Boards 1 8.00 6 0.82 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 9 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Total 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 3.5200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 3 8.00 0.00 9.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 1,663.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 6 70.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 10 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6092 0.6092 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6096 Total 3.3000e- 004 1.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 7.8000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9549 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Total 5.0500e- 003 0.0479 0.0581 9.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 3.5200e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 7.7338 7.7338 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 7.7937 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 11 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3453 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6092 0.6092 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6096 Total 3.3000e- 004 1.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 7.8000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9549 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.5800e- 003 0.0000 6.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.9500e- 003 6.9500e- 003 6.5400e- 003 6.5400e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Total 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 6.9500e- 003 0.0135 7.4000e- 004 6.5400e- 003 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 12 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9900 0.9900 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9906 Total 7.4100e- 003 0.2434 0.0524 6.7000e- 004 0.0152 7.9000e- 004 0.0160 4.1600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 64.7139 64.7139 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 64.7965 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.5800e- 003 0.0000 6.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.9500e- 003 6.9500e- 003 6.5400e- 003 6.5400e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Total 0.0135 0.1190 0.0997 1.5000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 6.9500e- 003 0.0135 7.4000e- 004 6.5400e- 003 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 12.6338 12.6338 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.7083 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 13 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9400e- 003 0.2431 0.0489 6.6000e- 004 0.0140 7.8000e- 004 0.0148 3.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 63.7239 63.7239 3.2800e- 003 0.0000 63.8059 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9900 0.9900 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9906 Total 7.4100e- 003 0.2434 0.0524 6.7000e- 004 0.0152 7.9000e- 004 0.0160 4.1600e- 003 7.6000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 64.7139 64.7139 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 64.7965 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Total 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 14 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Total 3.1800e- 003 0.0244 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 1.4500e- 003 1.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4160 3.4160 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.4298 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 15 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3808 0.3808 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3810 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Total 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 16 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8000e- 004 0.0203 5.0900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.5949 4.5949 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.6009 Worker 1.5100e- 003 1.0800e- 003 0.0112 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.6200e- 003 9.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.1499 3.1499 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1518 Total 2.1900e- 003 0.0213 0.0163 8.0000e- 005 4.7500e- 003 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.4100e- 003 0.0000 7.7448 7.7448 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7526 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Total 8.3100e- 003 0.0854 0.0670 1.5000e- 004 4.0800e- 003 4.0800e- 003 3.8700e- 003 3.8700e- 003 0.0000 13.4052 13.4052 3.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.4875 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 17 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8000e- 004 0.0203 5.0900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.5949 4.5949 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.6009 Worker 1.5100e- 003 1.0800e- 003 0.0112 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.6200e- 003 9.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.1499 3.1499 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1518 Total 2.1900e- 003 0.0213 0.0163 8.0000e- 005 4.7500e- 003 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.4100e- 003 0.0000 7.7448 7.7448 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7526 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4151 269.4151 0.0658 0.0000 271.0591 Total 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4151 269.4151 0.0658 0.0000 271.0591 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 18 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3680 0.0919 9.5000e- 004 0.0231 8.0000e- 004 0.0239 6.6800e- 003 7.7000e- 004 7.4500e- 003 0.0000 91.3798 91.3798 4.4900e- 003 0.0000 91.4922 Worker 0.0280 0.0193 0.2049 6.7000e- 004 0.0722 4.7000e- 004 0.0727 0.0192 4.3000e- 004 0.0196 0.0000 61.0209 61.0209 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 61.0551 Total 0.0392 0.3874 0.2968 1.6200e- 003 0.0953 1.2700e- 003 0.0966 0.0259 1.2000e- 003 0.0271 0.0000 152.4007 152.4007 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 152.5473 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4147 269.4147 0.0658 0.0000 271.0588 Total 0.1519 1.5338 1.3294 3.1100e- 003 0.0713 0.0713 0.0675 0.0675 0.0000 269.4147 269.4147 0.0658 0.0000 271.0588 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 19 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3680 0.0919 9.5000e- 004 0.0231 8.0000e- 004 0.0239 6.6800e- 003 7.7000e- 004 7.4500e- 003 0.0000 91.3798 91.3798 4.4900e- 003 0.0000 91.4922 Worker 0.0280 0.0193 0.2049 6.7000e- 004 0.0722 4.7000e- 004 0.0727 0.0192 4.3000e- 004 0.0196 0.0000 61.0209 61.0209 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 61.0551 Total 0.0392 0.3874 0.2968 1.6200e- 003 0.0953 1.2700e- 003 0.0966 0.0259 1.2000e- 003 0.0271 0.0000 152.4007 152.4007 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 152.5473 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4822 77.4822 0.0188 0.0000 77.9533 Total 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4822 77.4822 0.0188 0.0000 77.9533 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 20 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.0000e- 003 0.1002 0.0248 2.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 1.9200e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.1100e- 003 0.0000 26.0011 26.0011 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 26.0319 Worker 7.5100e- 003 4.9800e- 003 0.0541 1.9000e- 004 0.0207 1.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.5200e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 0.0000 16.8919 16.8919 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.9007 Total 0.0105 0.1051 0.0789 4.6000e- 004 0.0274 3.3000e- 004 0.0277 7.4400e- 003 3.1000e- 004 7.7500e- 003 0.0000 42.8930 42.8930 1.5800e- 003 0.0000 42.9326 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4821 77.4821 0.0188 0.0000 77.9532 Total 0.0393 0.3792 0.3775 8.9000e- 004 0.0174 0.0174 0.0165 0.0165 0.0000 77.4821 77.4821 0.0188 0.0000 77.9532 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 21 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.0000e- 003 0.1002 0.0248 2.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 1.9200e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.1100e- 003 0.0000 26.0011 26.0011 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 26.0319 Worker 7.5100e- 003 4.9800e- 003 0.0541 1.9000e- 004 0.0207 1.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.5200e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 0.0000 16.8919 16.8919 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.9007 Total 0.0105 0.1051 0.0789 4.6000e- 004 0.0274 3.3000e- 004 0.0277 7.4400e- 003 3.1000e- 004 7.7500e- 003 0.0000 42.8930 42.8930 1.5800e- 003 0.0000 42.9326 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 22 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8200e- 003 0.0406 0.0404 9.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.6400e- 003 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 7.8876 7.8876 2.4900e- 003 0.0000 7.9499 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 23 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.4008 0.4008 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4010 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2600e- 003 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Total 0.7265 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 24 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Total 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.7252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2600e- 003 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Total 0.7265 7.9100e- 003 6.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.9842 0.9842 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9868 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 25 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Total 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 6.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 6.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.0574 2.0574 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0586 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 26 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0609 0.3128 0.5327 2.1100e- 003 0.2106 1.4800e- 003 0.2120 0.0565 1.3800e- 003 0.0579 0.0000 195.2684 195.2684 7.1300e- 003 0.0000 195.4466 Unmitigated 0.0693 0.3579 0.7161 3.1200e- 003 0.3283 2.1000e- 003 0.3304 0.0881 1.9600e- 003 0.0900 0.0000 288.5506 288.5506 9.4900e- 003 0.0000 288.7879 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Total 381.90 778.05 565.25 882,871 566,188 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.585795 0.036515 0.193581 0.106455 0.012789 0.005274 0.019465 0.028415 0.002699 0.001789 0.005626 0.000921 0.000676 Hotel 0.585795 0.036515 0.193581 0.106455 0.012789 0.005274 0.019465 0.028415 0.002699 0.001789 0.005626 0.000921 0.000676 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 27 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 52.9405 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 57.7719 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 28 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 5.03619e +006 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Total 0.0272 0.2469 0.2074 1.4800e- 003 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 268.7503 268.7503 5.1500e- 003 4.9300e- 003 270.3473 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 29 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 166424 7.9965 0.0000 0.0000 7.9965 Hotel 1.03593e +006 49.7754 0.0000 0.0000 49.7754 Total 57.7719 0.0000 0.0000 57.7719 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 121424 5.8343 0.0000 0.0000 5.8343 Hotel 980377 47.1062 0.0000 0.0000 47.1062 Total 52.9405 0.0000 0.0000 52.9405 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 30 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 31 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Total 0.6132 1.0000e- 005 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 32 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Unmitigated 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.92788 / 0.26776 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Total 1.1579 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1704 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 33 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.92788 / 0.251427 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Total 1.1551 0.0628 1.4800e- 003 3.1677 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 34 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 52.01 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Total 10.5576 0.6239 0.0000 26.1559 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 35 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 6/16/2020 12:00 PMPage 36 of 36 840 El Camino Real Hotel - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual     Attachment 4 Updated Energy Calculations  HP: 0 to 100 0.0588 0.0529 Construction Equipment # Hours per Day Horsepower Load Factor Construction Phase Fuel Used (gallons) Excavators 1 8 158 0.38 Demo 558.56 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6 97 0.37 Demo 278.39 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Demo 50.89 Air Compressors 1 8 78 0.48 Site Prep 387.22 Graders 1 8 158 0.38 Site Prep 558.56 Plate Compactors 1 8 8 0.43 Site Prep 35.58 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Site Prep 50.89 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Site Prep 371.19 Air Compressors 1 8 78 0.48 Grading 193.61 Plate Compactors 1 8 8 0.43 Grading 17.79 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Grading 25.44 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6 97 0.37 Grading 139.20 Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8 221 0.50 Building 514.00 Cranes 1 4 231 0.29 Building 4,943.27 Forklifts 1 6 89 0.20 Building 2,190.33 Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 Building 10,198.57 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Building 5,888.46 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Building 807.22 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Arch Coating 101.77 Pavers 1 7 130 0.42 Paving 242.43 Paving Equipment 1 7 132 0.36 Paving 211.00 Signal Boards 1 8 6 0.82 Paving 27.76 Surfacing Equipment 1 8 263 0.30 Paving 400.38 Total Fuel Used 28,192.51 (Gallons) Demolition Phase Site Preparation Phase Grading Phase Building Construction Phase Paving Phase Architectural Coating Phase Total Days 349 840 El Camino Real Last Updated: 3/27/2020 Compression-Ignition Engine Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) Factors [1]: HP: Greater than 100 Values above are expressed in gallons per horsepower-hour/BSFC. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Construction Phase Days of Operation 22 22 11 12 44 460 1 6/16/2020 2:18 PM MPG [2]Trips Fuel Used (gallons) 24.2 8 78.55 24.2 13 127.64 24.2 10 49.09 24.2 70 10902.64 24.2 10 53.55 24.2 14 274.91 Total 11,486.38 MPG [2]Trips Fuel Used (gallons) 7.4 9 24.32 7.4 1,663 4494.59 7.4 - 0.00 7.4 - 0.00 7.4 - 0.00 7.4 - 0.00 Total 4,518.92 7.4 0 0.00 7.4 0 0.00 7.4 0 0.00 7.4 27 9295.66 7.4 0 0.00 7.4 0 0.00 Total 9,295.66 11,486.38 42,007.10 Sources: [1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Exhaust and Crankcase Emission Factors for Nonroad Compression-Ignition Engines in MOVES2014b . July 2018. Available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100UXEN.pdf. [2] United States Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2019. National Transportation Statistics 2019 . Available at: https://www.bts.gov/topics/national-transportation-statistics. Building Phase Paving Phase Trip Class Total Gasoline Consumption (gallons) Total Diesel Consumption (gallons) Trip Length (miles) 10.8 HAULING AND VENDOR TRIPS Demolition Building Phase 20.0 Paving Phase 20.0 20.0 Site Prep Phase 10.8 10.8 20.0 Paving Phase 7.3 WORKER TRIPS Constuction Phase Architectural Coating Phase Demolition Site Prep Phase Grading Phase Trip Length (miles) 10.8 10.8 10.8 Architectural Coating Phase 7.3 HAULING TRIPS VENDOR TRIPS Grading Phase 7.3 Architectural Coating Phase 20.0 Building Phase 7.3 Demolition 7.3 Site Prep Phase 7.3 20.0 Grading Phase 2 6/16/2020 2:18 PM     Attachment 5 Construction Health Risk Screening Calculations               Cair PM2.5 Exhaust 2.399E-04 ug m3 Construction Duration in Years 1.50 Onsite Maximum Exposure 3rd Trimester 0<2 2<9 2<16 16<30 16-70 Cair 2.40E-04 2.40E-04 2.40E-04 2.40E-04 2.40E-04 2.40E-04 DBR 361 1090 861 745 335 290 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 EF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Dose-air 8.31E-08 2.51E-07 1.98E-07 1.72E-07 7.72E-08 6.68E-08 CPF 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 ASF 10 10.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ED 0.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 AT 70 70 70 70 70 70 FAH 0.85 0.85 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.73 Risk in 1 mill 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Chronic Exposure 0.0291 0.0291 0.0291 0.0291 0.0291 0.0291 0-9 0.06 9.00 years 0-30 0.06 30.00 years 0-70 0.06 70.00 years AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1206 06/25/20 12:12:40 TITLE: 840 ECR HOTEL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- **************************** VOLUME PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.575E-06 g/s 0.457E-05 lb/hr VOLUME HEIGHT: 4.27 meters 14.00 feet INITIAL LATERAL DIMENSION: 9.94 meters 32.60 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.98 meters 6.50 feet RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN POPULATION: 3000 FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: 1.52 meters 4.99 feet INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POINT SOURCES ************************** PROBE ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 22. meters - 5000. meters Zo ROUGHNESS 1-HR CONC DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR LENGTH (ug/m3) (m) PERIOD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1* 1.000 0.2399E-02 22.4 WIN * = worst case flow sector ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 279.8 / 301.5 (K) MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY JDY HR -- -- -- --- -- 10 01 16 16 01 H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.40 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 19.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT - - - - - - - - - - - 10.0 301.5 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY JDY HR -- -- -- --- -- 10 01 16 16 01 H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.40 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 19.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT - - - - - - - - - - - 10.0 301.5 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- --------------------- 22.36 0.2399E-02 2525.00 0.1034E-04 25.00 0.2171E-02 2550.00 0.1027E-04 50.00 0.1085E-02 2575.00 0.1019E-04 75.00 0.6550E-03 2600.00 0.1012E-04 100.00 0.4476E-03 2625.00 0.1004E-04 125.00 0.3306E-03 2650.00 0.9974E-05 150.00 0.2573E-03 2675.00 0.9904E-05 175.00 0.2078E-03 2700.00 0.9835E-05 200.00 0.1725E-03 2725.00 0.9767E-05 225.00 0.1464E-03 2750.00 0.9700E-05 250.00 0.1263E-03 2775.00 0.9635E-05 275.00 0.1106E-03 2800.00 0.9570E-05 300.00 0.9786E-04 2825.00 0.9506E-05 325.00 0.8747E-04 2850.00 0.9443E-05 350.00 0.7884E-04 2875.00 0.9382E-05 375.00 0.7157E-04 2900.00 0.9321E-05 400.00 0.6538E-04 2925.00 0.9261E-05 425.00 0.6006E-04 2950.00 0.9201E-05 450.00 0.5545E-04 2975.00 0.9143E-05 475.00 0.5144E-04 3000.00 0.9085E-05 500.00 0.4791E-04 3025.00 0.9029E-05 525.00 0.4480E-04 3050.00 0.8973E-05 550.00 0.4205E-04 3075.00 0.8918E-05 575.00 0.3960E-04 3100.00 0.8863E-05 600.00 0.3742E-04 3125.00 0.8809E-05 625.00 0.3546E-04 3150.00 0.8756E-05 650.00 0.3371E-04 3175.00 0.8704E-05 675.00 0.3212E-04 3200.00 0.8653E-05 700.00 0.3070E-04 3225.00 0.8602E-05 725.00 0.2941E-04 3250.00 0.8552E-05 750.00 0.2823E-04 3275.00 0.8502E-05 775.00 0.2716E-04 3300.00 0.8453E-05 800.00 0.2619E-04 3325.00 0.8405E-05 825.00 0.2530E-04 3350.00 0.8357E-05 850.00 0.2448E-04 3375.00 0.8310E-05 875.00 0.2373E-04 3400.00 0.8263E-05 900.00 0.2304E-04 3425.00 0.8217E-05 925.00 0.2240E-04 3450.00 0.8172E-05 950.00 0.2181E-04 3475.00 0.8127E-05 975.00 0.2125E-04 3500.00 0.8083E-05 1000.00 0.2074E-04 3525.00 0.8039E-05 1025.00 0.2026E-04 3550.00 0.7996E-05 1050.00 0.1981E-04 3575.00 0.7953E-05 1075.00 0.1939E-04 3600.00 0.7911E-05 1100.00 0.1906E-04 3625.00 0.7869E-05 1125.00 0.1875E-04 3650.00 0.7828E-05 1150.00 0.1846E-04 3675.00 0.7787E-05 1175.00 0.1817E-04 3700.00 0.7747E-05 1200.00 0.1789E-04 3725.00 0.7707E-05 1225.00 0.1762E-04 3750.00 0.7668E-05 1250.00 0.1737E-04 3775.00 0.7629E-05 1275.00 0.1712E-04 3800.00 0.7590E-05 1300.00 0.1688E-04 3825.00 0.7552E-05 1325.00 0.1664E-04 3850.00 0.7515E-05 1350.00 0.1642E-04 3875.00 0.7477E-05 1375.00 0.1620E-04 3900.00 0.7441E-05 1400.00 0.1599E-04 3925.00 0.7404E-05 1425.00 0.1578E-04 3950.00 0.7368E-05 1450.00 0.1558E-04 3975.00 0.7332E-05 1475.00 0.1539E-04 4000.00 0.7297E-05 1500.00 0.1520E-04 4025.00 0.7262E-05 1525.00 0.1502E-04 4050.00 0.7228E-05 1550.00 0.1484E-04 4075.00 0.7193E-05 1575.00 0.1467E-04 4100.00 0.7159E-05 1600.00 0.1450E-04 4125.00 0.7126E-05 1625.00 0.1433E-04 4150.00 0.7093E-05 1650.00 0.1417E-04 4175.00 0.7060E-05 1675.00 0.1402E-04 4200.00 0.7027E-05 1700.00 0.1386E-04 4225.00 0.6995E-05 1725.00 0.1372E-04 4250.00 0.6963E-05 1750.00 0.1357E-04 4275.00 0.6932E-05 1775.00 0.1343E-04 4300.00 0.6901E-05 1800.00 0.1329E-04 4325.00 0.6870E-05 1825.00 0.1316E-04 4350.00 0.6839E-05 1850.00 0.1303E-04 4375.00 0.6809E-05 1875.00 0.1290E-04 4400.00 0.6779E-05 1900.00 0.1277E-04 4425.00 0.6749E-05 1925.00 0.1265E-04 4450.00 0.6720E-05 1950.00 0.1253E-04 4475.00 0.6690E-05 1975.00 0.1241E-04 4500.00 0.6661E-05 2000.00 0.1230E-04 4525.00 0.6633E-05 2025.00 0.1219E-04 4550.00 0.6604E-05 2050.00 0.1208E-04 4575.00 0.6576E-05 2075.00 0.1197E-04 4600.00 0.6548E-05 2100.00 0.1186E-04 4625.00 0.6521E-05 2125.00 0.1176E-04 4650.00 0.6493E-05 2150.00 0.1166E-04 4675.00 0.6466E-05 2175.00 0.1156E-04 4700.00 0.6439E-05 2200.00 0.1146E-04 4725.00 0.6413E-05 2225.00 0.1136E-04 4750.00 0.6386E-05 2250.00 0.1127E-04 4775.00 0.6360E-05 2275.00 0.1118E-04 4800.00 0.6334E-05 2300.00 0.1109E-04 4825.00 0.6309E-05 2325.00 0.1100E-04 4850.00 0.6283E-05 2350.00 0.1091E-04 4875.00 0.6258E-05 2375.00 0.1082E-04 4900.00 0.6233E-05 2400.00 0.1074E-04 4925.00 0.6208E-05 2425.00 0.1066E-04 4950.00 0.6183E-05 2450.00 0.1058E-04 4975.00 0.6159E-05 2475.00 0.1050E-04 5000.00 0.6135E-05 2500.00 0.1042E-04 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.2399E-02 0.2399E-02 0.2159E-02 0.1439E-02 0.2399E-03 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 22.36 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.2399E-02 0.2399E-02 0.2159E-02 0.1439E-02 0.2399E-03 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 22.36 meters Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 9.0.0 Daily Emission Estimates for ->Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Pounds)ROG (lbs/day)CO (lbs/day)NOx (lbs/day)PM10 (lbs/day)PM10 (lbs/day)PM10 (lbs/day)PM2.5 (lbs/day)PM2.5 (lbs/day)PM2.5 (lbs/day)SOx (lbs/day)CO2 (lbs/day)CH4 (lbs/day)N2O (lbs/day)CO2e (lbs/day) Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.24 2.56 2.26 5.13 0.13 5.00 1.16 0.12 1.04 0.00 350.21 0.10 0.00 353.70 Grading/Excavation 1.01 8.22 10.15 5.46 0.46 5.00 1.47 0.43 1.04 0.02 2,011.81 0.47 0.02 2,028.72 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.28 2.42 1.94 5.12 0.12 5.00 1.16 0.12 1.04 0.00 375.26 0.02 0.00 376.73 Paving 0.63 7.35 6.36 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.02 1,553.80 0.49 0.01 1,570.29 Maximum (pounds/day)1.01 8.22 10.15 5.46 0.46 5.00 1.47 0.43 1.04 0.02 2,011.81 0.49 0.02 2,028.72 Total (tons/construction project)0.13 1.14 1.25 0.90 0.06 0.84 0.23 0.06 0.18 0.00 254.63 0.06 0.00 256.78 Notes: Project Start Year ->2021 Project Length (months) ->18 Total Project Area (acres) ->1 Maximum Area Disturbed/Day (acres) ->1 Water Truck Used? ->Yes Phase Soil Asphalt Soil Hauling Asphalt Hauling Worker Commute Water Truck Grubbing/Land Clearing 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grading/Excavation 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paving 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs. Total Emission Estimates by Phase for ->Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Tons for all except CO2e. Metric tonnes for CO2e)ROG (tons/phase)CO (tons/phase)NOx (tons/phase)PM10 (tons/phase)PM10 (tons/phase)PM10 (tons/phase)PM2.5 (tons/phase)PM2.5 (tons/phase)PM2.5 (tons/phase)SOx (tons/phase)CO2 (tons/phase)CH4 (tons/phase)N2O (tons/phase)CO2e (MT/phase) Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 6.93 0.00 0.00 6.35 Grading/Excavation 0.09 0.73 0.90 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.00 179.25 0.04 0.00 163.98 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.02 0.14 0.12 0.30 0.01 0.30 0.07 0.01 0.06 0.00 22.29 0.00 0.00 20.30 Paving 0.02 0.22 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 46.15 0.01 0.00 42.31 Maximum (tons/phase)0.09 0.73 0.90 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.00 179.25 0.04 0.00 163.98 Total (tons/construction project)0.13 1.14 1.25 0.90 0.06 0.84 0.23 0.06 0.18 0.00 254.63 0.06 0.00 232.95 CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs. The CO2e emissions are reported as metric tons per phase. Daily VMT (miles/day) Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K. 480 El Camino Real PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified. 480 El Camino Real PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified. Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K. Total Material Imported/Exported Volume (yd3/day) Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Road Construction Emissions Model Version 9.0.0 Data Entry Worksheet Optional data input sections have a blue background. Only areas with a yellow or blue background can be modified. Program defaults have a white background. The user is required to enter information in cells D10 through D24, E28 through G35, and D38 through D41 for all project types. Please use "Clear Data Input & User Overrides" button first before changing the Project Type or begin a new project. Input Type Project Name 480 El Camino Real Construction Start Year 2021 Enter a Year between 2014 and 2040 (inclusive) Project Type 1) New Road Construction : Project to build a roadway from bare ground, which generally requires more site preparation than widening an existing roadway 2) Road Widening : Project to add a new lane to an existing roadway 3) Bridge/Overpass Construction : Project to build an elevated roadway, which generally requires some different equipment than a new roadway, such as a crane 4) Other Linear Project Type: Non-roadway project such as a pipeline, transmission line, or levee construction Project Construction Time 18.00 months Working Days per Month 22.00 days (assume 22 if unknown) Predominant Soil/Site Type: Enter 1, 2, or 3 1) Sand Gravel : Use for quaternary deposits (Delta/West County) 2) Weathered Rock-Earth : Use for Laguna formation (Jackson Highway area) or the Ione formation (Scott Road, Rancho Murieta) 3) Blasted Rock : Use for Salt Springs Slate or Copper Hill Volcanics (Folsom South of Highway 50, Rancho Murieta) Project Length 1.00 mile Total Project Area 0.50 acres Maximum Area Disturbed/Day 0.50 acres Water Trucks Used?1 1. Yes 2. No Material Hauling Quantity Input Material Type Phase Haul Truck Capacity (yd3) (assume 20 if unknown)Import Volume (yd3/day)Export Volume (yd3/day) Grubbing/Land Clearing Grading/Excavation Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade Paving Grubbing/Land Clearing Grading/Excavation Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade Paving Mitigation Options On-road Fleet Emissions Mitigation Select "2010 and Newer On-road Vehicles Fleet" option when the on-road heavy-duty truck fleet for the project will be limited to vehicles of model year 2010 or newer Off-road Equipment Emissions Mitigation Select "Tier 4 Equipment" option if some or all off-road equipment used for the project meets CARB Tier 4 Standard Will all off-road equipment be tier 4? The remaining sections of this sheet contain areas that require modification when 'Other Project Type' is selected. (for project within "Sacramento County", follow soil type selection instructions in cells E18 to E20 otherwise see instructions provided in cells J18 to J22) 2 Soil Asphalt No Mitigation Tier 4 equipment for limited equipment types For 4: Other Linear Project Type, please provide project specific off- road equipment population and vehicle trip data Please note that the soil type instructions provided in cells E18 to E20 are specific to Sacramento County. Maps available from the California Geologic Survey (see weblink below) can be used to determine soil type outside Sacramento County. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/information/geologic_mapping/P ages/googlemaps.aspx#regionalseries 4 Note: Required data input sections have a yellow background. No Mitigation Select "20% NOx and 45% Exhaust PM reduction" option if the project will be required to use a lower emitting off-road construction fleet. The SMAQMD Construction Mitigation Calculator can be used to confirm compliance with this mitigation measure (http://www.airquality.org/Businesses/CEQA-Land-Use-Planning/Mitigation). To begin a new project, click this button to clear data previously entered. This button will only work if you opted not to disable macros when loading this spreadsheet. Data Entry Worksheet 2 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Note: The program's estimates of construction period phase length can be overridden in cells D50 through D53, and F50 through F53. Program Program User Override of Calculated User Override of Default Construction Periods Construction Months Months Phase Starting Date Phase Starting Date Grubbing/Land Clearing 1.80 1/1/2021 Grading/Excavation 8.10 2/25/2021 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 5.40 10/30/2021 Paving 2.70 4/13/2022 Totals (Months) Note: Soil Hauling emission default values can be overridden in cells D61 through D64, and F61 through F64. Soil Hauling Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated User Input Miles/Round Trip Miles/Round Trip Round Trips/Day Round Trips/Day Daily VMT Miles/round trip: Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Grading/Excavation 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Paving 0.00 0 0.00 Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Grading/Excavation (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile)0.27 0.84 5.38 0.17 0.10 0.02 1,818.68 0.01 0.29 1,904.19 Paving (grams/mile)0.18 0.66 4.71 0.14 0.08 0.02 1,793.76 0.01 0.28 1,877.99 Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading/Excavation (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Pounds per day - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons per construction project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Asphalt Hauling emission default values can be overridden in cells D91 through D94, and F91 through F94. Asphalt Hauling Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated User Input Miles/Round Trip Miles/Round Trip Round Trips/Day Round Trips/Day Daily VMT Miles/round trip: Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Grading/Excavation 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0 0.00 Miles/round trip: Paving 0.00 0 0.00 Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Grading/Excavation (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile)0.27 0.84 5.38 0.17 0.10 0.02 1,818.68 0.01 0.29 1,904.19 Paving (grams/mile)0.18 0.66 4.71 0.14 0.08 0.02 1,793.76 0.01 0.28 1,877.99 Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading/Excavation (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Pounds per day - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons per construction project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 Data Entry Worksheet 3 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Note: Worker commute default values can be overridden in cells D121 through D126. Worker Commute Emissions User Override of Worker User Input Commute Default Values Default Values Miles/ one-way trip 0 Calculated Calculated One-way trips/day 0 Daily Trips Daily VMT No. of employees: Grubbing/Land Clearing 0 0 0.00 No. of employees: Grading/Excavation 0 0 0.00 No. of employees: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0 0 0.00 No. of employees: Paving 0 0 0.00 Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile)0.02 1.10 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.00 339.80 0.00 0.01 342.28 Grading/Excavation (grams/mile)0.02 1.10 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.00 339.80 0.00 0.01 342.28 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile)0.02 1.04 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.00 332.90 0.00 0.01 335.23 Paving (grams/mile)0.02 1.00 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.00 328.72 0.00 0.01 330.96 Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/trip)1.18 2.95 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.81 0.08 0.04 85.39 Grading/Excavation (grams/trip)1.18 2.95 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.81 0.08 0.04 85.39 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/trip)1.13 2.88 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.40 0.08 0.03 83.55 Paving (grams/trip)1.11 2.85 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.54 0.08 0.03 82.43 Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Pounds per day - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons per construction project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Water Truck default values can be overridden in cells D153 through D156, I153 through I156, and F153 through F156. Water Truck Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated User Override of Default Values Calculated User Input Default # Water Trucks Number of Water Trucks Round Trips/Vehicle/Day Round Trips/Vehicle/Day Trips/day Miles/Round Trip Miles/Round Trip Daily VMT Grubbing/Land Clearing - Exhaust 0 0 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 Grading/Excavation - Exhaust 0 0 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade 0 0 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0 0 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Grading/Excavation (grams/mile)0.43 1.14 6.49 0.21 0.15 0.02 1,859.78 0.02 0.29 1,947.39 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile)0.27 0.84 5.38 0.17 0.10 0.02 1,818.68 0.01 0.29 1,904.19 Paving (grams/mile)0.18 0.66 4.71 0.14 0.08 0.02 1,793.76 0.01 0.28 1,877.99 Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading/Excavation (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving (grams/trip)0.00 0.00 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Pounds per day - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pounds per day - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tons per const. Period - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons per construction project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Fugitive dust default values can be overridden in cells D183 through D185. User Override of Max Default PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Acreage Disturbed/Day Maximum Acreage/Day pounds/day tons/per period pounds/day tons/per period Fugitive Dust - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.50 5.00 0.10 1.04 0.02 Fugitive Dust - Grading/Excavation 0.50 5.00 0.45 1.04 0.09 Fugitive Dust - Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade 0.50 5.00 0.30 1.04 0.06 Fugitive Dust Data Entry Worksheet 4 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Values in cells D195 through D228, D246 through D279, D297 through D330, and D348 through D381 are required when 'Other Project Type' is selected. Off-Road Equipment Emissions Default Grubbing/Land Clearing Number of Vehicles Override of Current ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Override of Default Number of Vehicles Program-estimate Default Equipment Tier (applicable only when "Tier 4 Mitigation" Option Selected)Equipment Tier Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Aerial Lifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Air Compressors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Bore/Drill Rigs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cranes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crushing/Proc. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Generator Sets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Trucks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Construction Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other General Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Material Handling Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pavers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Paving Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Plate Compactors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pressure Washers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Signal Boards 0.06 0.30 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.00 49.31 0.01 0.00 49.56 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Skid Steer Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Surfacing Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Sweepers/Scrubbers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.19 2.26 1.90 0.11 0.10 0.00 300.90 0.10 0.00 304.14 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Trenchers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Welders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User-Defined Off-road Equipment If non-default vehicles are used, please provide information in 'Non-default Off-road Equipment' tab ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grubbing/Land Clearing pounds per day 0.24 2.56 2.26 0.13 0.12 0.00 350.21 0.10 0.00 353.70 Grubbing/Land Clearing tons per phase 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.93 0.00 0.00 7.00 N/A N/A N/A Equipment Tier 0.00 Number of Vehicles 0.00 0.00 N/A Mitigation Option 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A Data Entry Worksheet 5 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Default Grading/Excavation Number of Vehicles Override of Current ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Override of Default Number of Vehicles Program-estimate Default Equipment Tier (applicable only when "Tier 4 Mitigation" Option Selected)Equipment Tier Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Aerial Lifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Air Compressors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Bore/Drill Rigs 0.26 2.07 3.02 0.09 0.08 0.01 912.06 0.30 0.01 921.92 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cranes 0.21 0.99 2.42 0.10 0.09 0.00 279.37 0.09 0.00 282.38 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crushing/Proc. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Forklifts 0.13 1.17 1.18 0.08 0.08 0.00 148.03 0.05 0.00 149.63 1.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Generator Sets 0.36 3.68 3.17 0.17 0.17 0.01 623.04 0.03 0.00 625.23 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Trucks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Construction Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other General Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Material Handling Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pavers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Paving Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Plate Compactors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pressure Washers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Signal Boards 0.06 0.30 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.00 49.31 0.01 0.00 49.56 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Skid Steer Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Surfacing Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Sweepers/Scrubbers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Tier 4 Model Default Tier Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Trenchers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Welders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User-Defined Off-road Equipment If non-default vehicles are used, please provide information in 'Non-default Off-road Equipment' tab ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading/Excavation pounds per day 1.01 8.22 10.15 0.46 0.43 0.02 2,011.81 0.47 0.02 2,028.72 Grading/Excavation tons per phase 0.09 0.73 0.90 0.04 0.04 0.00 179.25 0.04 0.00 180.76 N/A N/A Equipment Tier N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of Vehicles 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mitigation Option N/A Data Entry Worksheet 6 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Default Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade Number of Vehicles Override of Current ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Override of Default Number of Vehicles Program-estimate Default Equipment Tier (applicable only when "Tier 4 Mitigation" Option Selected)Equipment Tier pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Aerial Lifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Air Compressors 0.28 2.42 1.94 0.12 0.12 0.00 375.26 0.02 0.00 376.73 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Bore/Drill Rigs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cranes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crushing/Proc. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Generator Sets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Trucks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Construction Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other General Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Material Handling Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pavers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Paving Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Plate Compactors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pressure Washers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Signal Boards 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Skid Steer Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Surfacing Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Sweepers/Scrubbers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Tier 4 Model Default Tier Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Trenchers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Welders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User-Defined Off-road Equipment If non-default vehicles are used, please provide information in 'Non-default Off-road Equipment' tab ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade pounds per day 0.28 2.42 1.94 0.12 0.12 0.00 375.26 0.02 0.00 376.73 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade tons per phase 0.02 0.14 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.00 22.29 0.00 0.00 22.38 N/A N/A N/A Equipment Tier N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Vehicles Mitigation Option 0.00 Data Entry Worksheet 7 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Default Paving Number of Vehicles Override of Current ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Override of Default Number of Vehicles Program-estimate Default Equipment Tier (applicable only when "Tier 4 Mitigation" Option Selected)Equipment Tier Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Aerial Lifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Air Compressors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Bore/Drill Rigs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Cranes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Crushing/Proc. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Generator Sets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Off-Highway Trucks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Construction Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other General Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Other Material Handling Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pavers 0.21 2.88 2.10 0.10 0.09 0.00 455.26 0.15 0.00 460.17 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Paving Equipment 0.18 2.55 1.74 0.08 0.08 0.00 394.47 0.13 0.00 398.73 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Plate Compactors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pressure Washers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Rubber Tired Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Signal Boards 0.06 0.30 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.00 49.31 0.01 0.00 49.56 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Skid Steer Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Surfacing Equipment 0.18 1.61 2.17 0.08 0.07 0.01 654.76 0.21 0.01 661.83 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Sweepers/Scrubbers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Trenchers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Model Default Tier Model Default Tier Welders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User-Defined Off-road Equipment If non-default vehicles are used, please provide information in 'Non-default Off-road Equipment' tab ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving pounds per day 0.63 7.35 6.36 0.28 0.26 0.02 1,553.80 0.49 0.01 1,570.29 Paving tons per phase 0.02 0.22 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.00 46.15 0.01 0.00 46.64 Total Emissions all Phases (tons per construction period) =>0.13 1.14 1.25 0.06 0.06 0.00 254.63 0.06 0.00 256.78 N/A N/A Equipment Tier N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.00 Number of Vehicles 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mitigation Option Data Entry Worksheet 8 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 6/25/2020 Equipment default values for horsepower and hours/day can be overridden in cells D403 through D436 and F403 through F436. User Override of Default Values User Override of Default Values Equipment Horsepower Horsepower Hours/day Hours/day Aerial Lifts 63 8 Air Compressors 78 8 Bore/Drill Rigs 221 8 Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 8 Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 8 Cranes 231 4.00 8 Crawler Tractors 212 8 Crushing/Proc. Equipment 85 8 Excavators 158 8 Forklifts 89 8 Generator Sets 84 8 Graders 187 8 Off-Highway Tractors 124 8 Off-Highway Trucks 402 8 Other Construction Equipment 172 8 Other General Industrial Equipment 88 8 Other Material Handling Equipment 168 8 Pavers 130 8 Paving Equipment 132 8 Plate Compactors 8 8 Pressure Washers 13 8 Pumps 84 8 Rollers 80 8 Rough Terrain Forklifts 100 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 247 8 Rubber Tired Loaders 203 8 Scrapers 367 8 Signal Boards 6 8 Skid Steer Loaders 65 8 Surfacing Equipment 263 8 Sweepers/Scrubbers 64 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 8 Trenchers 78 8 Welders 46 8 END OF DATA ENTRY SHEET Data Entry Worksheet 9