HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2021.05.19 @4001
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MAYOR’S COMMISSION ON
RACIAL AND SOCIAL EQUITY
Meeting held at: Teleconference meeting
Wednesday, May 19, 2021
4:00 p.m.
Call to Order Meeting called to order at 4:01 p.m. by Chair Nicolas
Roll Call COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Edith Arias, Jeff Azzopardi, Gladys
Balmas (4:04 pm), Norm Faria, Mike Futrell, Vanessa McGovern (4:25
pm), Hermes Monzon (4:20 pm), Mark Nagales, Flor Nicolas, Kayla
Powers, Bobby Vaughn (4:30 pm)
ABSENT: Cheska Ibasan, Liliana Rivera, Patricia Murray,
Alternate Present: Andrea Fernandez
Consent Calendar
1. Approval of the meeting minutes of April 21, 2021
Moved by Mark Nagales seconded by Mike Futrell to approve the minutes of the April
21, 2021 meeting as submitted. Motion passed with no opposition.
New Business
2. Welcome, Meeting Goals, Agenda Review
Chair Flor Nicolas welcomed the Commissioners to the meeting and provided welcoming
comments. She noted that the Staff and Consultant team is working on the Draft Report
for the Commission’s consideration and would like to postpone the June 16, 2021
meeting to prioritize report preparation.
Kym Dorman reviewed the meeting agenda and goal.
Myra Jolivet asked the Commission: how do we ensure that the import work of this
Commission becomes part of the city’s DNA. Commissioners commented that
accountability is important, including hiring practices and employment reviews, sustained
change and putting the measures in practice.
3. Review Commission Process and Accomplishments
Kym Dorman provided an overview of work completed to-date and next steps including
preparation of the Report for Commission consideration at the July 21, 2021 meeting by
the City Council in September 2021. Kym Dorman reviewed the outline of the report,
including year 1 implementation plan.
2
4. Review Commission Feedback on Vision Statements
Kym Dorman thanked Commissioners for their work on the Vision Statement. The
consultant team took elements from each of the two vision statements and drafted an
updated vision statement which reads as follows; “government and other institutions
within the city proactively address structural racism and promote social equity. This will
create a community in which all residents are safe, feel a sense of belonging, have
abundant opportunities and reach their full potential”.
5. Review Draft Rationale for Goals 1 and 2
Kym Dorman stated that each goal will include a rationale that states the case why the
goal is important for South San Francisco and includes relevant data/information. Kym
Dorman reviewed the draft rationales for Goals 1 and 2.
a. Small Group Discussion
Kym Dorman reviewed the comments from her group on the Vision statement,
specifically, adding “Black, Hispanic/Latinx, other residents of color and historically
marginalized/disenfranchised residents” Kym Dorman reported that her group
commented that for Goal 1, it needs to be constant and ongoing.
Myra Jolivet’s group suggested adding Asian, Pacific Islander community. She
also noted that her group suggested rewording the first sentence to reference “the
City and partner organizations”. Myra Jolivet noted that for Goal 1, her group
asked about the liaison position, how much influence will the position have. Mike
Futrell agreed that the position’s title should indicate the person has influence and
a seat at the table. Myra Jolivet noted that her group suggested replacing “Reduce
the Harm” on Goal 2 with “Eliminate” structural racism.
Nayeli Bernal reported that her group asked about reference to “other groups”.
Nayeli reported that her group commented that under Goal 1, the new position
should be within the City Manager’s office, needs more description language how
transparency occurs, add institutional racism and more descriptive language on
engagement. Nayeli Bernal stated her group suggested more specifics and
examples.
b. Public Comment
Flor Nicholas noted that we are paying close attention to the Daly City case and
see what can be learned from it. City Staff is participating in training from what has
already been learned from Daly City.
Dolores Piper stated her appreciation for the work the Commission is doing and
that she feels inspired. She noted a recent situation in Oakland that was de-
escalated with community participation. Dolores Piper also appreciates the City
learning from the situation in Daly City.
c. Commission Discussion
Commissioners reviewed the revised Vision Statement and voted on the following
statement: “The City, partner organizations, other institutions and the community
proactively address structural racism and promote racial and social equity. This
will create a community in which Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander,
3
other residents of color and other historically marginalized/disenfranchised
residents are safe, feel a sense of belonging, have abundant opportunities and
reach their full potential.”
Mark Nagales moved and Mike Futrell seconded approval of the Vision Statement
as revised. The motion was approved with 11 in favor and 3 absent.
6. Update on Strategies and Review Draft Desired Outcomes
a. Update on Strategies
i. Strategy 1.1: Establish a dedicated Equity + Inclusion Liaison
Mike Futrell reported that this fiscal year, the position will be filed by a
Management Fellow with plans to create a permanent position in the budget next
fiscal year. Currently interviewing candidates and hope to have the person hired
next month.
ii. Strategy 2.1: Mental Health Response Team
Mike Futrell provided an update noting this has been approved by the City and the
County. The County Health is actively recruiting full-time mental health clinician.
iii. Strategy 2.4: Community Safety and Equity Advisory Board
Mike Futrell noted the Resolution establishing the Board has been prepared for
City Council consideration.
Mike Futrell also noted that the City Council reviewed economic recovery, jobs
and income inequality measures and will be establishing a community resource
center downtown resulting in a $2.7m investment, with funds from City, County
and Federal. Mike Futrell stated that the City is currently recruiting for positions
(navigators and promotores) to support the community resource center.
Kym Dorman reviewed draft desired outcomes for each strategy.
a. Small Group Discussion
Kym Dorman reported on outcome for strategy 1.1, that her group noted initial fact
finding/audit of city departments and identify recommended changes and that it’s
important for the staff member to be bilingual and bicultural. Relating to strategy 2.1,
her group was in agreement with the suggested outcomes. Relating to strategy 2.4,
Kym Dorman’s group commented that it is important for the community to be
represented, accessible and that the public feels invited to participate.
Myra Jolivet noted for the outcome for strategy 1.1, her group commented on a
standardized, regular progress report on the outcomes. Relating to strategy 2.1, her
group commented on the outcome to decrease police interaction and consider
decreasing certain types of interactions. Relating to strategy 2.4, Myra Jolivet’s group
commented that the Board needs to be a safe space for the community and it should
be able to make recommendations.
Nayeli Bernal reviewed her group comments on outcome for Strategy 1.1, noting a
need to add training for staff. Relating to strategy 2.1, Nayeli Bernal commented that
her group suggested more proactive relationship building to stabilize community
members for the long term to result in fewer mental health calls.
4
b. Public Comment
Dolores Piper asked who will be on the Community Safety and Equity Advisory Board.
Kym Dorman noted that the Board composition is being developed. Dolores Piper
noted that the Board should include community members and have term limits.
c. Commission Discussion
Mark Nagales thanked the Commission for the great work and looks forward to
reviewing the Report.
7. Review Next Steps
Kym Dorman stated the Report will be considered at the July 21, 2021 Commission
meeting and presented to the City Council in September 2021. Flor Nicolas asked
Commissioners to provide their comments to her by May 26, 2021 on cancelling the
June 16, 2021 Commission meeting to provide time to focus on the report preparation.
Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:11 p.m.