HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-06-14 e-packet
AGENDA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14,2006
7:00 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you Inay know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular Ineetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of
each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Connnunity Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South
San Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community ROOln and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment.
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your nalne and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for
your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the itelns of business appearing on the Agenda. As she cOlnpletes
reading an item, it will be ready for Board action.
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR.
Vice Chair
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Boarrunelnber
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
KARYLMATSUMOTO
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
Clerk
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETIN OS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of May 24, 2006
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of June 14, 2006
3. Resolution authorizing environmental oversight agreement with the State of California
Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control for 27 South
Linden Avenue site
4. Motion to accept construction of new Fire Station 61 and Fire Administration Project as
complete in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
AGENDA
JUNE 14,2006
PAGE 2
~'t\\ s~
I~-
E;:l C")
v 0
C'4lIFOp,.~"'~
-
Redevelopment Agency
Staff Report RDA AGENDA ITEM #3
DATE:
June 14,2006
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Board
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant Executive Director
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO
AN ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC)
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a resolution authorizing the
Executive Director to enter into an Environmental Oversight Agreement with the State of
California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The environmental oversight agreement is made between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South
San Francisco and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to establish a mutual solution in
addressing Brownfields properties in the City of South San Francisco with known or perceived
environmental contamination in order to provide significant benefits to the economy and health of
surrounding communities. The environmental oversight agreement has been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney's office.
The oversight agreement is site specific to a certain property owned by the Redevelopment Agency
located at 27 South Linden A venue. In 1968, the Battery Sales and Processing Company (formerly
known as BASAPCO) leased the site from the City of South San Francisco. BASAPCO operated a lead
recovery operation at the site from 1968 to the mid 1990's. BASAPCO reclaimed lead from car and
heavy equipment batteries.
The site occupies approximately 2 acres in the City of South San Francisco. Lands surrounding the site
are industrial sites to the North and South, and commercial to the West. The site is bordered to the South
by Colma Creek, to the West by Linden Avenue, to the North by Praxair Industries, and to the East by
Southern Pacific Railroad. The buildings and other structures were removed in 1997. The site is zoned for
industrial use in the City's zoning map.
Staff Report
Subject: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
ENVIRONMENT AL OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT WITH THE ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC
SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC)
Page 2 of 3
Site operations included dismantling of batteries, disposing of battery acid, crushing plastic battery
casings and smelting lead for sale. Also, in 1983, BASAPCO operated a trucking business at the site. A
truck repair shop was maintained for servicing trucks. Lead, waste motor oil, acid and other hazardous
substances were used and generated for the on-site operations. Currently the entire site is vacant and
paved with 3-inches of asphalt.
The City plans to construct the "Lindenville Storm Drain Pump Station" at this site. The project will
mitigate the flooding within the Lindenville area and minimize infiltration and inflow of the storm water
into the City's sanitary sewer system.
In October 2004, staff hired the services of Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, to prepare the Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the project. In March 2005, City staff approved and circulated for public comment a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for a period of thirty days in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
No substantive comments were received. The environmental documents identified potential impacts
including storm water run-off and construction activities. Mitigation measures were proposed to reduce
the identified impacts to less than a significant level. The environmental documents will be used by City
Staff to identify and implement the final clean-up plan of the site during and upon completion of the
project.
The oversight agreement made between the City of South San Francisco and DTSC will provide the
technical consultation and assistance to the City by DTSC on the implementation of a clean-up plan for
the site per the requirements of the clean-up level determination, feasibility studies, if necessary, and the
implementation of the final clean-up plan. Upon approval of the final clean-up plan, the City will comply
with all the operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements and other institutional control measures, in
accordance with the final clean-up plan.
FUNDING
The cost for the DTSC Oversight per this Agreement amounts to $32, 932.00. The Oversight Agreement
cost estimate and schedule for 27 South Linden A venue (formerly BASAPCO) is shown in the attached
agreement. Sufficient funds are available for the Lindenville project and reflected in the 2005-2006
capital improvement program.
Staff Report
Subject: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
ENVIRONMENT AL OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT WITH THE ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC
SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC)
Page 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:
The Environmental Oversight Agreement between the City of South San Francisco and the DTSC will
establish a mutually beneficial working relationship to cooperatively address the Brownfields properties
in the City and to ensure that site clean-up for 27 South Linden A venue conforms to the requirements of
the Health and Safety codes mandated by the California EP A, DTSC and federal laws.
(
BY~
. Marty Van Duyn
Assistant Executive Director
Approved:
Attachment: Resolution
Environmental Oversight Agreement
RESOLUTION NO._
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ST ATE OF
CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO AN ENVIRONMENTAL
OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT WITH THE ST ATE OF
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL (DTSC)
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a resolution
authorizing the Executive Director to enter into an Environmental Oversight Agreement with the
State of California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
South San Francisco hereby authorize the Executive Director to enter into an Environmental
Oversight Agreement with the State of California Environmental Protection Agency.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Environmental Oversight Agreement
For the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
Contract No.
1. INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Oversight Agreement (Oversight Agreement) is made between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (Agency) and the California
Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The
Parties intend by. this Oversight Agreement to establish a mutually beneficial working
relationship and to cooperatively address Brownfields properties in the City of South San
Francisco. The Agency and DTSC both share the mission to revitalize and reuse Brownfields
properties to address known or perceived environmental contamination in order to provide
significant benefits to the economy and health of surrounding communities. DTSC is committed
to working in partnership with communities to restore contaminated properties to productive use,
while ensuring that cleanups' are' protective of public health and the environment. The Agency
intends to alleviate the causes and effects of blight through the construction of infrastructure
improvements, improvement or construction of public facilities and public uses, promoting
improvements in commercial, Jl}dustrial and residential areas, removing or alleviating the
negative effects of hazardous substances and improving, increasing and preserving the.
community's housing stock.
The Oversight Agreement outlines two different scopes of work and broad approaches for
DTSC to provide technical consultation, site investigation and remediation activity support. The
intent of the Oversight Agreement is to establish a collaborative process that (1) provides a
flexible process based upon the Redevelopment Agency's needs for the project; (2) ensures the
investigation and cleanup are conducted in an environmentally sound manner; (3) requires a
cieanup that results in a property that is safe for redevelopment; and (4) can provide liability
relief for redevelopment agencies that complete the site characterization and cleanup process.
Under this Program, DTSC can also provide consultative services to an Agency.
The Agency will select the specific Scope of Work that it believes addresses its particular needs
depending on whether the Agency is seeking (1) technical consultation only from DTSC, or (2)
DTSC assistance and response and remediation oversight in cases where the Agency intends
to proceed under the Polanco Act or other applicable laws as determined appropriate by DrSC
(Exhibit C).
Under this Oversight Agreement, the Agency may request (and pay for) services without any
commitment to move forward with a project or a Property, and may request early consultation
with DTSC, where desirable.
1.1. Purpose of Agreement. The purpose of this Oversight Agreement is to specify the
process that will be used to evaluate Brownfields properties within the Agency's and DTSC's
jurisdiction under this Oversight Agreement; to identify the properties that will be addressed
under this Oversight Agreement; to facilitate the remediation of Brownfields properties and to
provide a framework for the reimbursement of DTSC's oversight costs, and to assist the Agency
and others in meeting the environmental requirements to obtain the immunities and protections
1
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
under the Polanco Redevelopment Act set forth in Health & Safety Code SS 33459-33459.8
(Polanco Act), and such other California and federal statutes as may be appropriate.
1.2. Parties. OTSC and the Agency are collectively the "Parties" to this Oversight
Agreement.
1.3. Jurisdiction.
1.3.1. Agency Jurisdiction. The Agency has general delegated authority from the State
Legislature to eliminate blight pursuant to the Health and Safety Code. In addition, Health and
Safety Code section 33459.1, subdivision (a)(1) of the Polanco Act authorizes the Agency to
take any actions that the Agency determines are necessary and that are consistent with state
and federal laws to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances, as defined in Health
and Safety Code section 33459, subdivision (c), on, under, or from a property located in a
"Redevelopment Project Area," as defined in Health and Safety Code section 33320.1 (Project
Area), whether the Agency owns the property or not, if anyone of the conditions in Health and
Safety Code section 33459.1, subdivision (b) is met. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code
section 33459.1, subdivision. (6); even if the conditions in Health and Safety Code section
33459.1, subdivision (b) are not met, the Agency may take actions to investigate or conduct
feasibility studies or, if the Agency determines that the environmental condition of a property
requires immediate action, the Agency may take actions to remedy or remove a release of
hazardous substances. The Agency shall submit satisfactory evidence demonstrating its
authority to enter into this agreement to contract with DTSC. Such evidence should include a
resolution, motion or order confirming its authority.
1.3.2. OTSC Jurisdiction. Health and Safety Code section 25201.9 authorizes DTSC to
enter into agreements to perform consultative services for the. purposes of providing assistance
in complying with chapter 6.8 of division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. Health and Safety
Code sections 33459- 33459.8 and section 58009 authorize DTSC to take proper and
necessary actions for the protection and preservation of the public health as required for the
efficient exercise of DTSC's activities under the Polanco Act.
1.4. Properties. Generally, the property that will be the subject of this Oversight Agreement
are within Redevelopment Project Areas of concern to the Agency. A map of the
Redevelopment Project Areas located within the Agency's jurisdiction is attached as Exhibit A.
The specific properties to be included in this Oversight Agreement ("Property") at the time this
Oversight Agreement is executed are identified in Exhibit B, attached to this Oversight
Agreement. The Agency may propose new Redevelopment Project Areas and future properties
for incorporation into this Oversight Agreement. If approved by OTSC, new Redevelopment
Project Areas will be incorporated into this Oversight Agreement and identified in Exhibit A and
new Properties or groups of Properties will be incorporated into this Oversight Agreement and
identified in Exhibit B.
2. AGREEMENT
THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE THAT,
2.0. Activities to be Conducted. OTSC and the Agency will undertake activities as specified
in this Oversight Agreement to provide for Technical Consultation by OTSC related to site
2
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
January 2005
investigation, assessment, remediation and mitigation, or services related to activities to assess
hazardous substances releases as may be necessary or helpful for redevelopment. For each
particular Property, the parties acknowledge and agree that all work performed pursuant to this
Oversight Agreement is intended to be consistent with Health and Safety Code sections 33459-
33459.8, or Health and Safety Code sections 25300-25395.45, as appropriate.
2.0.1. Technical Consultation. Upon the request of the Agency's Oversight Agreement
Manager identified under Section 2.4 and subject to availability of DTSC resources, DTSC will
provide technical consultation to the Agency in accordance with the Scope of Work contained in
Exhibit C attached to. this Oversight Agreement. Technical consultation may include, but is not
limited to, participating in meetings, conferences, workshops, and/or conference calls,
researching responses to Agency's questions, reviewing existing data and preliminary reports
submitted by Agency or in OTSC's files, conducting site visits and performing general activities
to scope a project, including oversight of preliminary site characterization activities. Technical
consultation does not include oversight of removal, remediation or other site cleanup activities.
OTSC's completion of the activities described in the Scope of Work for technical consultation
shall constitute OTSC's complete performance for technical consultation under this Oversight
Agreement.
2.0.2. Site-Specific Property Oversight. For each Property subject to this Oversight
Agreement, OTSC will provide review and oversight of the activities conducted by the Agency,
as appropriate, in accordance with the Scope of Work contained in Exhibit C attached to this
Oversight Agreement that is developed by OTSC in consultation with the Agency pursuant to
this Section 2.0.2. Tasks identified for which DTSC will provide oversight will not be
implemented until DTSC's provides an approval of that Scope of Work. The Scope of Work in
Exhibit C applies to a Property being addressed under the Polanco Act or' other state and
federal laws as determined appropriate by OTSC. The Agency will conduct activities in the
manner specified in this Oversight Agreement in accordance with a mutually agreed upon
schedule. The Agency may direct or arrange for a third party to conduct those activities in the
same manner and in accordance with the same schedule. OTSC will review and provide the
Agency with written comments on all Agency deliverables as described in the Scope of Work.
For each Property, OTSC will provide oversight, as appropriate, of field activities, including but
not limited to observation of sampling activities and implementation of Cleanup Plans. DTSC's
completion of the activities described in the Scope of Work for each Property shall constitute
OTSC's complete performance under this Oversight Agreement for that Property.
2.1. Inclusion of Properties. For each Property the Agency proposes for site-specific
activities under this Oversight Agreement, the Agency will submit to DTSC (1) the information
required under Exhibit 8 for that proposed Property; and (2) any other appropriate information.
OTSC will discuss with the Agency any issues regarding incorporating a. proposed PropertY into
this Oversight Agreement. OTSC will provide written concurrence when it determines that
incorporating a proposed Property into this Oversight Agreement is appropriate and will develop
in consultation with the Agency a separate site-specific Scope of Work, site-specific cost
estimate and schedule for the Property. Upon approval in writing by both the Oversight
Agreement Manager for OTSC and the Agency, a revised Exhibit 8, C and 0 for the Property
will be incorporated into this Oversight Agreement.
2.2. Amendment of Exhibits. Upon approval in writing by the Oversight Agreement Manager
for OTSC and by the Agency, Exhibits A, 8, C, 0, E, and F may be amended and the Exhibits,
as amended, will be incorporated into this Oversight Agreement.
3
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
2.3. Additional Activities. Additional activities to the agreed upon Scope of Work may be
conducted and DTSC oversight provided by amendment to an Exhibit in accordance with
Sections 2.2 and 2.8. If DTSC expects additional oversight costs to be incurred related to these
additional activities, DTSC will provide an estimate of the additional oversight cost to the Agency
as an amendment to Exhibit C, and/or D, as applicable, as provided in section 2.7.
2.4. Oversight Agreement Managers and Project Managers. Barbara J. Cook, P .E. is
designated by DTSC as its Manager for this Oversight Agreement. Terry White, Director of
Public Works, is designated by the Agency as Manager for this Oversight Agreement. Each
Party to this Oversight Agreement will provide at least ten (10) days advance written notice to
the other of any change in its designated Oversight Agreement Manager. DTSC and the
Agency may designate a Project Manager for any Property incorporated into this Oversight
Agreement. Both OTSC and the Agency reserve the right to appoint different Project Managers,
pursuant to this Oversight Agreement, for different projects that may be ongoing at the same
time.
4
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
2.5 Notices and Submittals.
2.5.1. All notices, documents and communications that are to be given under this
Oversight Agreement, unless otherwise specified. will be sent to the respective Parties at the
following addresses
To DTSC:
Barbara J. Cook, P.E., Chief
ATTN: Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site project manager
Department of Toxic Substances Control
700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200
Berkeley, California 94710
To the Agency:
Terry White, Director of Public Works
City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
P.O Box 711
South San FranCIsco, CA 94083
2.5.2. The parties will give such notices to known property owners and other
parties as required by applicable law. (See Exhibit B for known property owners
for each Property.)
2.6. DTSC Document Review and Approval. If DTSC determines that any report, plan,
schedule or other document submitted for approval pursuant to this Oversight Agreement does
not meet the conditions in this Oversight Agreement or fails to protect public health or safety or
the environment, DTSC will consult with the Agency and either (1) return comments to the
Agency with recommended changes or (2) modify the document, with Agency concurrence, as
deemed necessary and approve the document as modified.
2.7. Payment. An estimate of DTSC's oversight costs for each Property with respect to the
Scope of Work described in Exhibit C is contained in Exhibit D. All Parties understand that a
Cost Estimate will be prepared for eOach Property and incorporated into this Oversight
Agreement per Section 2.1. Such Cost Estimates shall include all labor, materials and
expenses incurred by DTSC in performing the services contemplated by this Oversight
Agreement and specified in the Scope of Work for such Property. The Parties understand that
the Cost Estimates set forth in Exhibit D are estimates and cannot be relied upon as the final
cost figure. The Agency agrees to pay (1) all costs incurred by DTSC and in association with
preparation of this Oversight Agreement and for review of documents submitted by the Agency
prior to the effective date of the Oversight Agreement; and (2) all costs incurred by DTSC in
implementing and providing oversight or conducting other activities pursuant to this Oversight
Agreement. Costs incurred include interest on unpaid amounts that are billed and outstanding
more than 60 days from the date of DTSC's quarterly invoice. DTSC will notify the Agency in
writing when it approaches charges of sixty-five percent (65%) of the total Cost Estimate
prepared for a Property. The parties agree to evaluate the budget to determine if either a
revised estimate or scope of work is needed at the time of the written notice or whether the
Agency wishes to terminate as provided in Section 24 of the Standard Provisions. If DTSC or
the Agency anticipates a change in the Scope of Work or the need for revision of the Cost
Estimate, DTSC will provide a revised estimate in advance of exceeding the total cost estimate.
5
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
2.7.1. In anticipation of the services to be rendered under this Oversight Agreement,
the Agency will make an advance payment of $17,000 to DTSC no later than thirty (30) days
after the effective date of this Oversight Agreement. If the Agency's advance payment does not
cover all costs payable to DTSC under this subsection, DTSC will invoice the Agency quarterly.
The Agency agrees to pay the additional costs within sixty (60) days of receipt of DTSC's
quarterly invoice.
2.7.2. All payments made by the Agency for activities performed for a Property
pursuant to this Oversight Agreement will be by check made payable to the "Department of
Toxic Substances Control," and bearing on its face the project code for the Property (See
Exhibit B) and the Contract Number of this Oversight Agreement. All payments made by the
Agency for DTSC activities performed pursuant to this Oversight Agreement, but not applicable
to a Property will be by check made payable to the "Department of Toxic Substances Control"
and bearing on its face the project code for this Oversight Agreement [CalStars Code for this
Oversight Agreement] and the Contract Number of this Oversight Agreement. Payments should
be sent to:
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Accounting/Cashier . "...
1001 I Street, 21st Floor
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, California 95812-0806
2.8. Exhibits. Standard provisions of this Oversight Agreement are contained in Exhibit E
(Oversight Agreement Standard Provisions), which is attached to this Oversight Agreement. All
exhibits att;3ched to this Oversight Agreement, including Exhibit E, are incorporated into this
Oversight Agreement by reference.
2.9. Effective Date. The effective date of this Oversight Agreement is the date when this
Oversight Agreement is fully executed.
2.10. Representative Authority. Each undersigned representative of the Parties to this
Oversight Agreement certifies that she or he is fully authorized to enter into the terms and
conditions of this Oversight Agreement and to execute and legally bind the Parties to this
Oversight Agreement.
2.11. Counterparts. This Oversight Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number
of counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original,
but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same document.
Date:
Barbara J. Cook, P.E., Chief
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program
Department of Toxic Substances Control
r
ancisco Redevelopment Agency
Date: t3 /30 ~
Approved as to form
-:li Q
Date:
6
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
By'
EXHIBITS
A MAP OF CITY THAT IDENTIFIES THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (S)
WITHIN AGENCY'S JURISDICTION
B PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR EACH INCLUDED PROPERTY AND LOCATION
MAP SHOWING EACH INCLUDED PROPERTY WITHIN A REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA.
6
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
~
EXHIBIT B
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR EACH INCLUDED PROPERTY
Property Name, Site Description Site History Advance
Location ,Payment,.
."
Former BASAPCO, Inc. The Site occupies In 1968, the Battery
site approximately 2 Sales and Processing , "
27 South linden acres in the city of Company (later known -'-..'
Avenue South San as BASAPCO) leased
South San Francisco Francisco, San the Site from the City
San Mateo County Mateo County. of South San ~ . "
California 94080 Land surrounding Francisco. BASPCO
the Site is industrial operated a lead
APN(s): to the north and recovery operation at
014-074-020 south and the Site between 1968
commercial to the and the mid-1990s.
Project Code: west. The Site is BASAPCO reclaimed
41360069 bordered to the lead from car and
south by Colma heavy equipment
Cr12~k, to the west batteries. Site
Property Owners and by linden Avenue, operations included
addresses: to the north by dismantling batteries,
The City of South San Praxair Industrial disposing of battery
Francisco Welding Supplies, acid, crushing plastic
400 Grand Avenue and to the east by battery casings, and
South San Francisco Southern Pacific smelting lead for sale.
California, 94080 Railroad. The Also, in 1983,
buildings and other BASAPCO operated a
onsite structures . trucking business at
were removed the Site. A repair shop
during the first half was maintained for
of 1997. The site is servicing trucks. Lead,
zoned for industrial waste oil, acid, and
use in the Planning other hazardous
Division's October substances were used
2003 zoning map. and generated from
the above operations.
The property is
currently vacant and
aved with as halt.
Note: Prepared 1/7/05
EOA version 03/04-1
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
B-1
January 2005
EXHIBIT C
REMEDIATION OVERSIGHT SCOPE OF WORK for
27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
The following tasks may be completed as part of this Oversight Agreement:
DTSC will provide technical consultation and assistance to the Agency for the Property in
accordance with a mutually agreed upon schedule and subject to availability of OTSC
resources. Technical consultation and assistance may include, but is not limited to, participating
in meetings, conferences, workshops, and/or conference calls, researching responses to
Agency's questions, reviewing existing data and preliminary reports submitted by Agency,
conducting site visits, and performing general technical consultation and ~ssistance. Technical
consultation and assistance do not include oversight of removal, remediation or other site
cleanup activities.
Technical Consultation and Assistance.
TASK 1.
TASK 2.
Review of Existino Data and Scopino MeetinQ.
The Agency will submit to OTSC a listing of all known reports in its possession, including
sample analysis results, environmental assessment reports, and any other information in its
possession pertinent to the hazardous substance and hazardous waste management and/or
release, characterization and cleanup of a Property. The Agency will provide copies of any of
non-privileged reports or information requested by OTSC and will identify privileged or other
confidential documents that the Agency is not providing. The Agency will also inform DTSC of
any other known reports and documents, not in its possession, pertinent to the hazardous
substance and hazardous waste management and/or release, characterization and cleanup of a
Property, including the name of the document (if known) and the identity and address of the
person/entity with possession of the document if known. subject to the availability of OTSC
resources, OTSC will review the information in accordance with a mutually agreed upon
timeframe included in Exhibit D, to identify areas and media of concern, and determine whether
additional work, if any, would be required to complete the investigation and/or cleanup of the
Property. OTSC wi\1 respond to the Agency in writing, setting forth OTSC's initial conclusions
regarding these matters. Following OTSC's initial review, a scoping meeting will be held to
discuss whether further site characterization is necessary, and, if so, how the characterization
will be conducted for the Property, and which of the Tasks are appropriate and how they will be
implemented. The critical goal of the scoping meeting is to agree on the focus of the site
investigation and remedial or response actions and to agree on the applicability and scope of
the remaining Tasks. The parties contemplate a flexible process and the level of detail and
requirements and the applicability of each Task will be jointly evaluated by the parties' Project
Managers.
TASK 3.
The objective of this task is to characterize the extent of hazardous substance and hazardous
waste contamination at the Property. This task may be conducted in sequential phases, such
as a separate soil or groundwater investigation.
Site Characterization.
Site Characterization Report. The Agency may submit a Site Characterization Report that, at a
minimum, presents the data, summarizes the findings of the investigation, validates data and
includes recommendations and conclusions. OTSC will review the Site Characterization Report
and will advise the Agency in writing, within the period specified in Exhibit 0, of either OTSC's
C-1
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
approval of such report, or DTSC's requirements for approval. The Site Characterization Report
may, in appropriate circumstances, be combined with the Remedy Selection Document or
Remedial Action Plan referred to in Task 6 or included with other documents prepared by or on
behalf of the Agency.
TASK 4.
Risk Evaluation and Cleanup Level Determination.
If the Agency decides to proceed with a remedy or removal action, a scoping meeting may be
held to discuss how the risk evaluation and cleanup level determination will be conducted for the
Property. If appropriate, the Agency may conduct a risk evaluation consistent with U. S. EPA
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (EPA/540/1-89/002) and DTSC's Supplemental
Guidance for Human Health Multimedia Risk Assessments of Hazardous Waste Sites and
Permitted Facilities. This evaluation should identify the chemicals of concern and potential
routes of exposure; characterize the potential risk; evaluate potential risks to environmental
receptors; consider existing and contemplated uses of the Property; and identify site cleanup
goals. If DTSC agrees, this information may be submitted in the Remedy Selection Document
or Remedial Action Plan or another document combining one or more tasks contained in this
agreement. The parties recognize that, depending on ,the site characterization and the
proposed remedy or removaL ,action, a site specific risk evaluation may not always be
necessary. However, the following information must be included in the remedy selection
document: identification of chemicals of concern, remedial action objectives and cleanup goals
and discussion of the derivation of the cleanup goals as appropriate.
TASK 5.
Feasibilitv Study.
The objective of this task is to evaluate feasible remediation and response alternatives. If the
Agency decides to proceed with the remedy or removal action, reasonable potential alternatives
for the remediation of a Property and response to the presence of hazardous substances should
be evaluated, including the "no action" alternative. Such an evaluation may be incorporated in
the Remedy Selection Document, or may, if the analysis is complex, be addressed in a separate
study or report. The evaluation should (a) identify the goals for the cleanup based upon current
and projected future land uses; (b) evaluate feasible alternatives to meet these goals; and (c)
recommend a preferred alternative. The feasibility study may be included in or combined with
the Remedy Selection Document or the "Remedial Action Plan" or the "Cleanup Plan" or other
document, as approved by DTSC.
TASK 6.
Remedv Selection Document.
The purpose of the Remedy Selection Document is to summarize results of the site
characterization, risk evaluation and feasibility study and to describe the remedial action or
removal plan. The remedy selection may be entitled "Remedy Selection Document," "Remedial
Action Plan" (RAP) or "Cleanup Plan" and may include other tasks described herein. The
document shall address the following:
(a) a description of the site, site history, site environmental setting, and contamination;
(b) a summary of the risk evaluation conducted, if necessary;
(c) current and contemplated land uses of the Property;
(d) zoning and general plan designation of the Property;
( e) the goals to be achieved by the cleanup;
(f) a summary description of the feasibility study conducted;
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
C-2
January 2005
(g) a description of the recommended alternative (including any required and/or suggested
land use covenants, an operation and maintenance agreement and plan, financial
assurance and other operation and maintenance requirements, as appropriate);
(h) implementation and enforcement plan if operation and maintenance requirements are
identified or if a land use covenant is necessary;
(i) the name of the party, if not the Agency, who will be responsible for implementing and
operating the final remedy, including any remedy requiring a startup operation period;
and
m an administrative record list.
Within sixty (60) days of DTSC's written approval of the final RAP or Cleanup Plan, DTSC will
acknowledge, in writing, that upon proper completion of the final RAP or Cleanup Plan, the
immunity provided by Health and Safety Code section 33459.3(b) shall apply to the Agency.
TASK 7.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
DTSC and the Agency will discuss what CEQA documents are necessary and who shall
prepare the necessary CEQA documents, as well as the appropriate Lead Agency and
Responsible Agency under th.e- CEQA process. DTSC and the Agency will work together to
ensure that the proposed environmental document contains the information necessary for the
Agency and DTSC to evaluate impacts from the proposed remediation. It is the goal of both
DTSC and the Agency that the CEQA document be used by both entities in meeting their
respective obligations under CEQA. If, however, for reasons specific to th~ project, the
processes cannot be efficiently combined, then DTSC will prepare its own CEQA document for
the RAP or Cleanup Plan. If required, the Agency shall submit the information necessary for
DTSC to prepare this document.
TASK 8.
Implementation of Final RAP or Cleanup Plan.
Subject to the provisions of Section 5 of the Standard Provisions concerning endangerment
during implementation, nothing herein will require the Agency to proceed with implementation of
a RAP or Cleanup Plan with respect to any Property if it determines not to do so. The Agency
will provide DTSC with written notice of the Agency's decision to either implement or not
implement the Final RAP or Cleanup Plan. Upon DTSC approval of the RAP or Cleanup Plan
and schedule, and if the Agency decides to proceed with the remedy or removal action at a
Property, the Agency will implement or will direct the implementation of the approved final RAP
or Cleanup Plan, as applicable, in accordance with the approved schedule. At the completion of
field work, the Agency (or such other party conducting the remediation or other response or
removal actions with respect to a Property) will submit a final Implementation Report discussing
the work completed and. noting any deviations from the approved plan. Within 60 days of the
date DTSC finds that a remedial or removal action has been properly completed in accordance
with the Final RAP or Cleanup Plan, DTSC will notify the Agency, in writing, that the immunity
provided by Health and Safety Code section 33459.3, subdivision (c) is in effect.
This immunity extends to other such parties entitled to immunity pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33459.3(e). In the event that Operation and Maintenance is required, the Parties
agree that the immunity provided by Health and Safety Code section 33459.3(e) shall be
expressly conditioned upon the satisfactory performance of all responsibilities pursuant to Task
12 of this Agreement. In the event that DTSC finds that the remedy is not functioning properly
and successfully, and performing as designed, or that the remedy will not attain the final
performance standards or cleanup goals specified in the final RAP or Cleanup Plan (including
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
c-3
,January 2005
the implementation and enforcement of institutional controls if applicable), DTSC will, as soon
as administratively feasible, notify the Agency.
TASK 9.
Chanqes Durinq Implementation of the Final RAP or Cleanup Plan.
If during implementation of the final RAP or Cleanup Plan, DTSC determines that additions,
modifications or revisions to such document may be necessary to protect human health and
safety or the environment or to implement the final RAP or Cleanup Plan, DTSC will, as soon as
administratively feasible, notify the Agency and the parties will determine the appropriate
revisions to such document; provided, however, and subject to the provisions of Sections 5 and
23 of the Standard Provisions concerning endangerment during implementation, nothing herein
will require the Agency to continue to proceed with the implementation of the modified RAP or
Cleanup Plan with respect to a Property if it determines not to do so.
TASK 10.
Public Participation.
(a) The Agency and DTSC will conduct appropriate public participation activities given the
nature of the community surrounding the Property and the level of community interest. The
Agency will work cooperativety..with DTSC to ensure that the affected and interested public and
community are involved in the decision-making process applicable to the clean-up of the
Property, taking into account the Agency's existing public participation capabilities and
procedures. DTSC and the Agency will strive to integrate the public participation activities
associated with the RAP or Cleanup Plan with the public participation activities associated with
the development of the Properties to the maximum extent possible.
(b) A scoping meeting may be held to determine the appropriate activities that will .be
conducted to address public participation. If necessary, the Agency will then prepare a public
participation plan for the Property that describes the proximity of homes and/or schools, day
care facilities, churches, and similar uses; the current and proposed land uses within and
adjacent to the Property; media interest; and involvement of community groups and elected
officials. The plan shall also include a mailing list, identify appropriate information repositories,
and specify the public participation activities that the Agency will undertake to provide
opportunities for public involvement in site-related decisions. The Agency and DTSC will
evaluate whether a fact sheet and public notices are necessary, as well as their content,
distribution and circulation, and whether a public meeting is appropriate depending on the
circumstances and the nature of the remedial or removal action, as well as any other public
participation procedures.
TASK 11.
Land Use Covenant.
If required pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 67391.1, the Parties
agree that the final RAP or Cleanup Plan will contain a requirement for a land use covenant
imposing appropriate limitations on land use when hazardous substances, hazardous materials,
hazardous constituents or hazardous wastes will remain at the Property at levels that are
determined by DTSC as not suitable for unrestricted use of the land. If DTSC determines a land
use covenant is necessary, the Agency agrees to sign and record a land use covenant
approved by DTSC, or if the Agency is not the Property Owner, the Agency will arrange for the
Property Owner to sign and record the land use covenant approved by DTSC. The land use
covenant must be recorded in the County where the land is located prior to DTSC's
determination that a remedial or removal action has been properly completed in accordance
with the final Remedial Action Plan or Cleanup Plan for a Property.
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
C-4
January 2005
TASK 12.
Operation and Maintenance (O&M).
The Agency will comply with. or arrange for compliance with, all operation and maintenance
(O&M) requirements or other institutional control measures. in accordance with the final RAP or
Cleanup Plan. The Agency shall designate in the final RAP or Cleanup Plan the parties that will
enter into an O&M Agreement, or otherwise be responsible for compliance with all O&M
requirements, prior to certification of the Property. Compliance with any applicable O&M
Agreement, and any land use covenant or other institutional control measures, must be included
as a requirement for any new owner/lessee in a purchase and sale agreement for the Property.
Any party that is responsible for O&M shall notify OTSC of any transfer of operation and
maintenance responsibilities at least 30 days prior to such transfer. DTSO may, at its discretion,
require the transferee to enter into a new O&M Agreement.
TASK 13.
Discontinuation of Cleanup TechnoloQY.
Any cleanup technology employed in implementation of the final RAP or Cleanup Plan will be
left in place and operated by the Agency, owner of the Property (or its successors), or such
other party designated in the final RAP or Cleanup Plan until and except to the extent that
DTSC authorizes the AgenCYJ. Property Owner or such other party designated in the final RAP
or Cleanup Plan, in writing, of the ability to discontinue, move or modify some or all of the
cleanup technology because the final remedial action has met the criteria specified in the final
RAP or Cleanup Plan for its discontinuance, or because the modifications would better achieve
the goals of the final RAP or Cleanup Plan.
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
C-5
January 2005
EXHIBIT D
OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT COST ESTIMATE AND SCHEDULE FOR
27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
TITLE Project Tech Industrial Public Tox- PEAS Legal
Manager Sr/Sup Hygienist Participatio icologist
n
CLASSIFICATION HSS/HSE SHSS/ AIH PPS AT Env. Sr Staff
SHSE Plann Counsel
er
TASK:
Agreement 20 2
Preparation/Negotiatio . ,.......
n
Risk Assessment 10 1 20
20 ... 20
California 2
Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) activities
Review Draft Cleanup 40 4 16 40
Plan
Review Final Cleanup 20 2
Plan
Cleanup Plan 30 3
implementation and
Implementation
Report
Deed Restriction / 20 2 10
O&M Agreement
Certification 10 1
TOTALS
Total Hours/Class 170 17 16 40 20 20 10
Loaded Hourly Rate 111 128 96 104 124 109 153
Cost/Class 18.870 2.176 1.536 4,160 2,480 2,180 1,530
Total Cost $32,932
DTSC OVERSIGHT COST ESTIMATE
D-1
,January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
DOCUMENT/EVENT PROPONENT'S DTSC'S COMMENTS DUE
SUBMITTAL DATE
submittal of Existing and Site Ongoing As needed
Background Data
Community Profile (including proponent will submit as DTSC will review within 20
mailing list) early as possible. days* from the date of receipt.
Draft Risk Assessment Within 21 days after . Within 20 days after the date
Oversight Agreement of receipt.
executed.
Final Risk Assessment Within 15 days after receipt of Within 10 days after the date
comments. of receipt.
Draft Cleanup Plan Within 40 days from the date Within 30 days from the date
of approved Risk of receipt of report.
Assessment.
Revised Draft Cleanup Plan Within 20 days from the date
. "within 30 days from the date of receipt of report.
of receipt of DTSC
comments.
Final Draft Cleanup Plan Within 15 days from the date Within 10 days from the date
of receipt of DTSC of receipt of report.
comments.
Summary of Responses to Within 21 days from the date
Public Comments of receipt of all public
comments.
Final Cleanup Plan Within 21 days from the date Within 15 days from the date
of receipt of Summary of. of receipt of report.
Responses to Public
Comments.
Cleanup Plan Implementation Within 30 days from the date
of Final Cleanup Plan
approval.
Cleanup Plan Implementation Within 30 days of completion Within 21 days from the date
Report of field activities. of receipt of report.
Revised Implementation Review and concurrence
Report within 15 days of within 15 days of receipt of
receipt of DTSC comments. revised Implementation
Report.
Certificatio n Within 30 days of Cleanup
Plan Implementation Report
approval.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
*Days are in calendar days.
D-1
January 2005
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
EXHIBIT E
OVERSIGHT AGREEMENT STANDARD PROVISIONS
1. The Standard Provisions in this Exhibit E are incorporated by reference into and are a
part of the Oversight Agreement. The Standard Provisions have been placed in this Exhibit E
for reasons of administrative efficiency.
2. Payment Provisions. Subject to Section 2.7 of the Oversight Agreement, if any bill is not
paid by the Agency within sixty (60) days after it is sent by OTSC, the Agency may be deemed
to be in material default of this Oversight Agreement.
If the advance payment submitted under Section 2.7.1 of this Oversight Agreement exceeds
DTSC's actual costs for Oversight Agreement preparation, consultation, review, approval,
oversight and other activities conducted under this Oversight Agreement, DTSC will provide an
accounting for expenses and refund the difference within one hundred-twenty (120) days after
termination of this Oversight Agreement in accordance with Section 24 of this Exhibit. In no
other case will the Agency be entitled to a refund from DTSC or to assert a claim against DTSC
for any amount paid or expended under this Oversight Agreement.
3. Billing Dispute Resolution.. If the Agency disputes a DTSC billing, or any part of a DTSC
billing, the Agency will notify DTSC's designated Oversight Agreement Manager and attempt to
informally resolve the dispute. If the Agency desires to formally request dispute resolution with
regard to the billing, the Agency will file a request for dispute resolution in writing within 45 days
of the date of receiving the bill in -dispute. The written request will describe all issues in dispute
and will set forth the reasons for the dispute, both factual and legal. The Agency will send the
written request to:
Special Assistant for Cost Recovery and Reimbursement Policy
Department of Toxic Substances Control
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, CA 95812-0806
The Agency will also send a copy of the written request for dispute resolution to the person
designated in subsection 2.5.1 of this Oversight Agreement to receive submittals. A decision on
the billing dispute will be rendered by the person designated above or other DTSC designee.
The existence of a dispute shall not excuse, stay or suspend any other compliance obligation or
deadline required pursuant to this Oversight Agreement.
4. Communications. All DTSC approvals and decisions made regarding submittals and
notifications will be communicated to the Agency in writing by DTSC's Oversight Agreement
Manager or his/her designee. No informal advice, guidanCe, or suggestions or comments by
DTSC regarding reports, plans, specifications, schedules or any other writings by the Agency
shall be construed to relieve the Agency of the obligation to obtain such written approvals.
5. Endangerment During Implementation. In the event DTSC determines that any activity
or operations caused by or on behalf of the Agency or its agents (whether or not pursued in
compliance with this Oversight Agreement) may pose an imminent or substantial endangerment
to the health and safety of people on any Property or in the surrounding area or to the
environment: i) the Agency will take the necessary actions to abate the endangerment it created
for such period of time as may be needed to abate the endangerment; or ii) if OTSC determines
that conditions require DTSC to exercise its authority to abate the endangerment, the Agency
may stop further implementation of this Oversight Agreement as it applies to a Property.
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
E-1
January 2005
However. if the Agency stops implementation. the Agency must meet the conditions under
Section 12 of this Exhibit (Notification of Environmental Condition) and, if necessary, must
revise the applicable Scope of Work and meet the stop-work conditions as provided in Section
23 of this Exhibit (Amendments). If OTSC determines that an endangerment is the result of
Agency actions that have caused a release of hazardous substances or substantially worsened
the endangerment, the Agency will take those reasonable steps DTSC determines are
necessary to mitigate the condition that the Agency caused or substantially worsened and to
secure the Property in order to avoid endangerment to the community. These steps may include
installing a protective cover, constructing fencing and signage or other appropriate means to
protect public health and the environment. The Agency will not be compelled to fully assess or
mitigate a release of hazardous substances if DTSC determines that the Agency did not cause
or substantially worsen the release.
6. Condition Precedent. It is expressly understood and agreed that DTSC's receipt of the
advance payment described in subsection 2.7.1 of this Oversight Agreement is a condition
precedent to any obligation of DTSC to provide consultation, oversight, review and/or comment
on documents or to provide any work or perform any activity pursuant to this Oversight
Agreement.
7. Record Retention. DTSC will retain all cost records associated with the work performed
under this Oversight Agreement for such time periods as may be required by applicable state
law. The Agency may request to inspect all documents that support DTSC's cost determination
in accordance with the Public Records Act, Govemment Code section 6250 et seq.
8. Project Coordinator. The work performed for each Property pursuant to this Oversight
Agreement will be under the direction and supervision of a qualified Project Coordinator, with
expertise in hazardous substance and hazardous waste site cleanup. For each Property, the
Agency will submit: a) the name and address of the Project Coordinator; and b) in order to
demonstrate expertise in hazardous substance and hazardous waste site cleanup, the resume
of the Project Coordinator. The Agency will promptly notify OTSC of any change in the identity
of the Project Coordinator. All engineering and geological work shall be conducted in
conformance with applicable state law, including but not limited to, Business and Professions
Code sections 6735 and 7835.
9. Access. If OTSC determines access is necessary in order to perform any of the tasks
contained in Exhibit D (Scope of Work for Remediation Oversight), the Agency will exercise its
best efforts to provide access for OTSC and its representatives to the Property subject to this
Oversight Agreement for which access is needed. In the event that such access is not provided,
it is understood that the implementation of tasks identified in this agreement for the Property for
which access cannot be obtained may not proceed. The Agency will also exercise its best
efforts to provide access for DTSC and its representatives access and/or obtain access to any
area beyond the boundaries of the Property subject to this Oversight Agreement to which
access is necessary to implement this Oversight Agreement. To the extent such access is
obtained by the Agency, such access will be provided to OTSC's employees, contractors, and
consultants at all reasonable times. Nothing in this section is intended or shall be construed to
limit in any way the right of entry or inspection that DTSC or any other agency may otherwise
have by operation of any law. To the extent such access can be legally obtained by OTSC or
the Agency, OTSC and its authorized representatives shall have the authority to enter and move
freely about all of the property at each Property at all reasonable times for purposes including,
but not limited to: inspecting records and operating logs, sampling activities, administering any
other aspects of this Oversight Agreement relating to the Property, reviewing the progress of the
EOA
Former BASAPCO. Inc. Site
E-2
,Ianuary 2005
Agency in carrying out the terms of this Oversight Agreement, conducting such tests as DTSC
may determine are necessary, and verifying the data submitted to OTSC by the Agency.
10. Sampling, Data and Document Availability. The Agency will submit to DTSC a listing of
all known reports in its possession, including sample analysis results, environmental
assessment reports, and any other information in its possession pertinent to the hazardous
substance and hazardous waste management and/or release, characterization and cleanup of a
Property. The Agency will provide copies of any non-privileged reports or information requested
by DTSC and will identify privileged or other confidential documents that the Agency is not
providing. The Agency will also inform DTSC of any other known reports and documents, not in
its possession, pertinent to the hazardous substance and hazardous waste management and/or
release, characterization and cleanup of a Property, including the name of the document (if
known) and the identity and address of the person/entity with possession of the document (if
known).
11. Notification of Field Activities. The Agency will inform DTSC at least seven (7) days in
advance of all field activities which the Agency undertakes, including activities the Agency
directs a third party to undertake, pursuant to this Oversight Agreement at each Property and
will allow OTSC and its authorized representatives to take duplicates of any samples collected
by the Agency pursuant to this- Oversight Agreement.
12. Notification of Environmental Condition. The Agency shall notify OTSC's Agreement
Manager immediately upon learning of any condition posing an immediate threat to public health
or safety or the environment.-. Within seven (7) days of the Agency's discovery of such a
condition, tlie Agency shall submit a brief report to OTSC, setting forth the events that occurred
and the measures taken, if any, in response to tho$e events.
13. Preservation of Documentation. The Agency will maintain a central repository of the
data, reports, other documents that it prepares pursuant to this Oversight Agreement and other
documents relevant to the activities conducted under this' Oversight Agreement. All such data,
reports and other documents regarding a specific Property will be preserved by the Agency for a
minimum of six (6) years after the conclusion of all activities carried out under this Oversight
Agreement with respect to that Property. If OTSC requests that some or all of these documents
be preserved for a longer period of time, the Agency will either: (i) comply with that request, (ii)
deliver the documents to OTSC, or (Hi) permit OTSC to copy the documents prior to destruction.
Following the expiration of the six-year minimum retention period for documents regarding a
Property, the Agency will notify OTSC in writing at least ninety (90) days before destroying any
documents prepared pursuant to this Oversight Agreement with respect to that Property. If any
litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records has been started before
the expiration of the six year period with respect to a Property, the related records will be
retained until the completion and resolution of all issues arising from that action or until the end
of the six-year period, whichever is later.
14. Time Periods. Unless othelWise specified, time periods begin from the date this
Oversight Agreement is fully executed, and "days" means calendar days. "Business days"
means all calendar days that are not weekends or official State holidays.
15. Agency Liabilities. This Oversight Agreement shall not be construed in any manner as
an admission by the Agency of any fact or liability of any kind, nor shall this Oversight
Agreement be considered or interpreted as an admission or an assumption by the Agency of
any liability or acknowledgment of liability or responsibility for the investigation or asses$ment
of, response or remediation to any environmental condition on any Property or the costs of such
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
E.3
January 2005
activities, for which the Agency is not otherwise liable or responsible. Nothing in this Oversight
Agreement shall constitute or be considered a satisfaction or release from liability for any
condition or claim arising as a result of Agency's past, current, or future operations. Nothing in
this Oversight Agreement is intended or shall be construed to limit the rights of any of the
Parties with respect to claims arising out of or relating to the release, discharge, deposit or
disposal of hazardous substances or hazardous wastes at the Property or at any other location,
if such hazardous substances or hazardous wastes are removed from a Property.
16. State Government Liabilities. The State of California (State) shall not be liable for any
injuries or damages to persons or property resulting from acts or omissions by the Agency or its
directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, successors, assigns, contractors or
consultants in carrying out any action or activity pursuant to this Oversight Agreement. Neither
DTSC nor the State may be deemed to be a party to any contract entered into by the Agency or
its directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, assigns, contractors or consultants in
carrying out any action or activity pursuant to this Oversight Agreement.
17. Third Party Actions. In the event that the Agency is a party to any suit or claim for
damages or contribution to which DTSC is not a party, relating to a Property subject to this
Agreement, the Agency will notify DTSC in writing within ten (10) days after service of the
complaint in the third-party acti'on. However, failure to give such notice within 10 days will not
be a material breach of this agreement, and this requirement confers no rights on any third
parties not party to this Agreement.
18. Reservation of Rights. DTSC and the Agency each reserve the following rights.
a. DTSC reserves its right to pursue cost recovery under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended,
California Health and Safety Code sections 25201.9. 25343, 25360, 33459.3, subdivision (m)
and any other law. The Agency reserves its rights to pursue cost recovery under the California
Health and Safety Code section 33459-33459.8 (Polanco Act) and any other applicable section
of the law.
b. Nothing in this Oversight Agreement is intended or shall be construed to limit,
preclude or affect the authority of DTSC to pursue any legal, equitable or administrative
remedies pursuant to state or federal law or to take any action authorized by law or equity to
protect public health and safety or the environment and recovering the costs thereof, including
DTSC's authority to take action, or require other persons to take action, under chapter 6.5 or
chapter 6.8 of division 20 of the Health and Safety Code or under the Polanco Act and to
recover DTSC's costs for those actions.
c. Nothing in this Oversight Agreement shall constitute or be construed as a waiver,
defense to, or limitation on of the Agency's rights (including any covenant not to sue or release),
with respect to any claim, cause of action, or demand in law or equity that the Agency may have
against any person, as defined in section 101 (21) of CERCLA, or Health and Safety Code
section 25319, who is not a signatory to this Oversight Agreement.
19. Compliance with Applicable Laws. Nothing in this Oversight Agreement relieves the
Agency from complying with all applicable laws and regulations, and the Agency will conform to
all actions required by this Oversight Agreement to all applicable federal, state and local laws
and regulations.
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
E-4
January 2005
20. California Law. This Oversight Agreement shall be governed, performed and interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.
21. Parties Bound. This Oversight Agreement applies to and is binding, jointly and
severally, upon each signatory and upon any successor agency of either the Agency or the
State of California that may have responsibility for and jurisdiction over the subject matter of this
Oversight Agreement. No change in the ownership or corporate or business status of a
Property or any owner of a Property shall alter any signatory's responsibilities under this
Oversight Agreement.
22. Severability. If any portion of this Oversight Agreement is ultimately determined not to
be enforceable, that portion will be severed from the Oversight Agreement and the severability
shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining terms of the Oversight Agreement.
23. Amendments. Except as otherwise specified in this section and in section 2.2 of this
Oversight Agreement, this Oversight Agreement may be amended as specified in this section to
withdraw any Property from this Oversight Agreement. The Agency may withdraw a Property
from this Oversight Agreement by giving written notice to DTSC that the Agency will stop work
on that Property within the next thirty (30) days. DTSC may withdraw a Property by giving
written notice to the Agency thGltDTSC will stop work on that Property within the next thirty (30)
days. The effective date of withdrawal is the end of the 30 day notice period. Prior to stopping
work on a Property, the Agency must ensure that the Property will pose no greater public health
or environmental risk than it posed prior to the Agency's activities on the Property. In the event
that the Agency withdraws a Property from this Oversight Agreement, the Agency will be
responsible for DTSC's costs through the effective date of withdrawal. The Scope of Work may
be amended by mutual written agreement of the parties. Such amendments or modifications are
effective on the third business day following the day the last Party signing the amendment or
modification sends its notification of signing to the other Party. The Parties may agree to a
different effective date. An amendment to incorporate a Property into this Oversight Agreement
and to incorporate by reference site-specific Exhibits for that Property shall be made as
specified in subsections 2:1,2.2, and 2.3 of this Oversight Agreement.
24. Termination for Convenience. Except as otherwise provided in this Section, each Party
to this Oversight Agreement reserves the right to unilaterally terminate this Oversight
Agreement for any reason. Termination requires that either Party give a thirty (30) day advance
written notice of the election to terminate this Oversight Agreement to the other Party. Prior to
termination the Agency must. ensure that the Property will pose no greater public health or
environmental risk as a result of the Agency activities than it posed prior to the Agency's
activities at the Property. In the event that this Oversight Agreement is terminated under this
section and subject to Section 2.7 of the Oversight Agreement, the Agency will be responsible
for DTSC's costs through the effective date of termination.
EOA
Former BASAPCO, Inc. Site
E-5
Ja.nuary 2005
~'t\\ s~
~g
10 ("l
>-0 u;
E;:l C")
v c
~lIFOp,.~"'~
Redevelopment Agency
Staff Report
RDA AGENDA ITEM #4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
June 14,2006
Redevelopment Agency Board
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant Executive Director
SUBJECT: NEW FIRE STATION 61, ENGINEERING FILE NO. 51-13232-9921
PROJECT NO. PB-04-1
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board, by motion, accept the construction of
new Fire Station 61 and Fire Administration, Engineering File No. 51-13232-9921, Project No.
PB-04-1, as complete, in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Pinnacle DB (PDB) was selected as the project construction manager for this project. As part of the
contract, it was agreed between the City Engineer, City Attorney and PDB that all subcontracts would be
competitively bid to comply with California Law. As a result, bid categories were created to cover the
various portions of work, for a total of 32 projects.
An invitation to bid was advertised in numerous publications on March 7, 2005 and March 15, 2005
and bid packages were also placed at four county builder exchanges in Santa Clara, Contra Costa, San
Mateo and San Francisco. Publications utilized were the San Mateo Times, Bluebook.com (a general
construction bidding internet site) and the City of South San Francisco's web site. Bids were received
for only seven of the 32 projects with multiple bids in some packages.
Staff started the re-bidding process by publishing an advertisement of the project in the San Mateo Times,
Bluebook.com, and the four county builder's exchanges to insure adequate notification of contractors was
achieved. Bids were opened on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 2:00 PM for all Informal Bid Items (items
which are anticipated to cost under $100,000.00), and on Thursday, May 12,2005, for Formal Bid Items
(items which are anticipated to cost more than $100,000.00).
The responsive low bidders with their corresponding awarded contract amounts are shown on Exhibit
"A". Exhibit "A" also shows the change order amounts, the final contract amount for each responsive low
bidder and a brief explanation of the change orders.
Staff Report
Subject:
NEW FIRE STATION 61, ENGINEERING FILE NO. 51-13232-9921
PROJECT NO. PB-04-1
Page 2 of 3
The project budget approved by the Redevelopment Agency Board during the award was as follows:
Architectural & Engineering Fees
Construction Management Fee
Construction (Base Bid)
Construction (Alternate Bid 1)
Construction (Alternate Bid 2)
Construction (Alternate Bid 3)
Construction Contingency
City Administration Cost
Information Technology Cost
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
$ 176,425.00
$ 480,577.00
$2,066,610.00
$ 543,528.00
$ 79,728.00
$ 251,417.00
$ 100,000.00
$ 90,000.00
$ 200,000.00
$ 200.000.00
Project Budget Total
$4,188,285.00
Funding for the project approved by the Redevelopment Agency Board during contract award was
$4,200,000.00. The total project construction cost is $4,169,375.38, with the following construction cost
breakdown.
Architectural & Engineering Fees
Construction Management Fee
Actual Construction Cost
City Administration Cost
Information Technology Cost
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
$ 176,425.00
$ 480,577.00
$3,038,390.32 (See Exhibit "A" attached)
$ 72,271.00
$ 199,700.00
$ 202.012.06
Final Project Construction Total
$4,169,375.38
CONCLUSION:
The project completed the construction of new Fire Station 61 and Fire Administration Building
according to the approved plans and specifications and below the project budget. Fire Station 61
and Fire Administration were constructed based on the Uniform Building Code requirements for
Essential Facilities.
Staff Report
Subject:
NEW FIRE STATION 61, ENGINEERING FILE NO. 51-13232-9921
PROJECT NO. PB-04-1
Page 3 of 3
The project was inspected by City Staff and PDB, and was completed in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications. With the Board's approval, Staff will file a Notice of
Completion and release the payment performance bond and retention funds at the end of the
thirty-day lien period. The project has a one-year warranty period, which takes effect upon
acceptance by the Redevelopment Agency Board.
BY.~
. Marty Van Duyn
Assistant Executive Director
.,
Approved:
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Final Cost Summary, Fire Station 61 and Fire Administration
NIC New Water & Fire Line Cost
Sub-Total Bid Items 23so:23s1
36
35
California Water
Pinnacle DB, Inc.
District
NIC
New Fuel Tanks, New Pre-cast for Draft Ptt,
Add Fuel Storage Tanks, Relocation of Exist
Tanks & Other Related Stte Work
$219411228.90h
29,000.00 $29,000.00
97;161.421 $3.038.390.32
This change order Is for the connection of a new domestic waterline and
I performed ~ California Water District.
ire system
ine
$99.947.001 $
10,000.00
These change orders are for extra work associated with the scope of work, unforseen costs
and field changes approved by City staff.
$109,947.00
34
31
~
33
Redwood City Electric
Pinnacle DB, Inc.
Western Allied Mechnical, Inc.
Prlbuss Engineering, Inc.
238
2378
2379
2380
Electrical
Plumbing
$425,735.001 $
$153,163.00 $
$211,220.00 $
$255,000.00 $
14,983.00
2,650.00
3,383.00
(18,000.00)
$440,718.00
$155,813.00
$214,603.00
$237.000.00
~
30
28
Pinnacle,
Boyett Construction
Boyett Construction
Ashland Glass & Millwork
Sun Valley Doors & Windows,
Inc.
~
2375
2376
2377
Appliances & Equipment
HVAC
Concrete
Framing-Metal
Framing-Wood
Cabinetry/Casework
Doors & Hardware
23
24
25
26
27
Henley & Company
Pinnacle, DB
Hurricane Hauling & Demolition
Andreini Brothers
DB
~
2372
2373
2374
EIFS
Sheet Metal
Demolttion
Ea'rthWOrk
$69,910.00
$72.353.00
$151,165.00
$52,801.00
$141,672.00
$8,025.00 $
$4,118.00 $
$11,275.00 $
$225,896.24 t.
$
]
$
1
$
7,932.00
1.370.00
24,346.53
$81.1
$72.353.00
$159,097.00
$54.171.00
$166,018.53
5,618.50
1,244.00
$80,096.00
$4,118.00
$11,275.00
$210,~
54.00
the course of construction
This change order is for ttems of work deleted in the contract.
This change order is for the installation of a new driveway and repair of a damaged curb,
[gutter & sidewalk.
22
2370
72.071.00
This change order performed the work on item 22. Net savings of $61,928.00 to the City.
21
Mauck Metal
2369
Metal Wall Panels
20
19
Allied Fire
SDG
2368
2367
Fire Sprinklers
Speciatties
$133,999.001 $
$65,840.001 $
$87.062.661 $
(1
33,999.00)
8,
7,045.00
51.28
$0.00
$73,991.28
$94.107.66
This change order is for extra work install ceramic tile at one counter in the ambulance bay
This change order is for the revisions of specialty ttems such as cabinet and locker hinges,
special signs, extra flagpoles and other ttems.
This change order is for additional fire dampers and fire motor alarms per fire department
recommendations.
This change order cancelled
he contract for
non-compliance wtth the contract
requirements.
18
De Alba Bros. Tile, Inc.
2366
Ceramic Tile
$49,552.001 $
2,000.00
17
Terra Ltte
2365
Flooring-Epoxy
$19,467.001 $
400.00
$51,552.00
$19,867.00
to
is
This change order is for the additional area in
contract including extra f1oor...E!'eparation work.
16
15
B.T. Mancini & Company
Performance Contracting Inc. (PC I)
D & D Painting
D & D Painting
B.T. Mancini & Company
2364
2360
2361
~
2363
Flooring-Carpet
ceilings
Painting-Interior
Painting-Exterior
Flooring-Rubber
$38,546.001 $
$28,100.00
$62,200.00 $
$19,000.00 $
$70,214.00 $
3,552.00
~
14
12
6
7
8
9
10
11
P & A Construction
DB
Gypsum Board
Countertops- stainless steel
Countertops- wood
Storefront
Windows
Glass & Glazing
Roofing
Acoustical
Pinnacle.
~
~
Pinnacie,
~
Pinnacle,
DB
DB
DB
DB
2355
~
2356
2357
2358
2359
$121,000.00 $
$27,635.00
$20,519.00
$21.500.00
$12,400.00
$32,180.00
$9,380.00
1
$
:!
j
$
]
$
5,524.00
1,358.00
720.00
$42,098.00
$86,058.00
$27,635.00
$21,239.00
$21.500.00
$12,400.00
$32,180.00
$9,380.00
$29,458.00
$62.200.00
$19.000.00
$75,738.00
This change order is for the replacement of the rubber flooring
the contract and other additional floor preparation work.
This change order for the extra floor work to seal the existing -rom excessive moisture.
the ambulance bay area not covered by the
loors
in one stairwell
area not part of
This change order is for the revision of the drop ceilings in FS 61's living area to accommodate
the skv!lahts.
This change order is to add an additionai counterto~ at FS 61
5
2354
(34,942.00)
4
3
This change order is for extra work due to plan revisions during
This change order is for plan revisions.
This change order is for the revision of the fire station roll-up doors, extra panels and
associated wiring for the door motors.
This change order is for the purchase of a commercial grade ice-maker and changes in the
appliance spec~ications wtth no overhead cost.
This change order is for addttional ducting. venting and motor controls per plan revision.
This Is the deductive change order to delete the Ambulance Bay drain system to their contact.
See ttem 1.
These change orders are for additonal electrical work, wiring. and electrical panels not covered
in the contract, also field changes approved durinQ the course of construction.
Pinnacle, DB
Handcrafted Metals
2353
2352
nsulation
Structural Steel
$42,480.001 $
$1
8,31
.001 $
29,698.00
55,161
$72,178.00
the work for
drywall
taping &
2
A & D Automatic Gate & Access
Pinnacle. DB
235
2350
Fenci'!\!.
Saw-cutting
$63,913.00
$15.650.001 $
$
9,132.00
$173,472.11
$63,913.00
$24,782.00
raming system not previously
unctions as the second extt for
This change order is for the installation of the new Ambulance Bay drain system. This is a
revision to the original design that resulted in a savings from the Pribuss Engineering Contract
in the amount of $18,000.00. See Item 33.
identified in
FS 61 per the
ITEM
NO.
CONTRACTOR'S NAME
Exhibit
'All
BID
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACT
COST
Final Cost Summary
Fire Station 61 and Fire Administration
TOTAL CCO
TO-DATE
ADJUSTED
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
Explanation of Change Orders
~'t\\ S::1N
~
~ . ~\j:.
(~ . E)
B g
C4lIFOp,.~\~
-
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, California 94083
Meeting to be held at:
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
\VEDNESDAY, JUNE 14,2006
7:05 P.M.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code ofthe
State of California, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting
on Wednesday, the 14th day of June, 2006, at 7:05 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building,
Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California.
Purpose of the meeting:
I. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting
Agenda
4. Closed Session: Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.95,
conference with legal counsel, liability claims - claimant: Sieger
5. Adjournment
Ci~k ~
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
'WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14,2006
7:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting
Council business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at
7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San
Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item,
please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the
City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public
comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for
investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more
comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your
name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES
PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation.
The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Council action.
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Mayor
RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR
Vice Mayor
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Councilman
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Councilman
KARYLMATSUMOTO
Councilwoman
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
City Treasurer
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
City Clerk
BARRY M. NAGEL
City Manager
STEVEN T. MATTAS
City Attorney
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMP AIRED AT CITY COUNCJ[L MEETINGS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
. Announcements
. Committee Reports
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of May 17 and 24,2006
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of June 14,2006
3. Resolution approving the City Treasurer's Investment Policy for FY 2006-07
4. Resolution authorizing filing of application for Federal Surface Transportation Funds
through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for Livable Communities Program
for the BART linear park
5. Resolution authorizing filing of application to Metropolitan Transportation Commission
for funds from Federal Surface Transportation Program, or the Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality Improvement Program funding in the amount of$537,000 for
construction of a segment of the BART linear park
. 6. Resolution authorizing consultant agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. for
Engineering Division staff augmentation services in an amount not to exceed $95,000
7. Motion to accept the demolition of the greenhouse structures project at Orange
Memorial Park as complete
8. Resolution recommending that the San Mateo County Flood Control District impose
charges for funding the 2006..07 Countywide National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) General Program
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I
9. Resolutions approving stornlwater management service charges for FY 2006-07 and
adopting Report of Stormwater Management Services Fees, pursuant to SSFMC Chapter
14.04
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
JUNE 14,2006
PAGE 2
10. Resolution approving increase for sewer rates effective FY 2006-07, amending master
fee schedule and adopting Report of Annual Sewer Rentals or Charges, pursuant to
SSFMC Chapter 14.12
11. Consideration of use permit (UP-05-001 0) and design review (DR-05-0020) to allow
construction of a Home Depot store, garden center and parking structure at 900 Dubuque
Avenue; Applicant: Home Depot; Owner: Levitz SL San Francisco - Request to
continue item to June 28, 2006
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Motion to approve tentative subdivision map for property located at 90 Oak Avenue,
allowing thirteen residential condominiums and common area; density bonus of nine
percent allowing one additional dwelling unit; affordable housing agreement restricting
three dwellings as affordable housing units; and design review allowing construction of
a three story, thirteen unit, residential condominium building with thirty parking spaces
and common area; P06-0016: SA06-0001, AHA06-0001, DB06-0001 and DR06-00015;
Owner/Applicant: Patrick Doherty (Continuedfrom May 10,2006; public hearing
closed)
13. Approval ofFY 2006-07 operating budget
a. Resolution approving the operating budget for the City of South San Francisco
for FY 2006-07 and appropriating the corresponding funds
b. Resolution modifying certain sections of the master fee schedule for FY 2006-07
c. Resolution approving the capital improvement program budget for FY 2006-07
d. Resolution approving personnel changes, including classification descriptions
and salary ranges andJor unit designations for various departments
e. Motion to waive reading and introduce an ordinance amending SSFMC Chapter
3.12 to implement Council-approved position, title additions, deletions" andJor
changes
14. Resolution accepting an increase in refuse collection rates effective July 1, 2006 as
submitted by the South San Francisco Scavenger Company and authorizing adjustment
to sludge hauling rates
15. Resolution amending the City Council Handbook sections related to City Council
reorganization meeting, C/CAG appointments, public facilities dedication ceremony
protocol, responses to City Council requests for information, City Council expense
reimbursement policy, and Board and Commission member absence policy
COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
JUNE 14,2006
PAGE 3
AGENDA ITEM #3
City Treasurer's Report
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Richard Battaglia, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: Annual Certification of City's Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution to recertify the City's Investment
Policy for fiscal year 2006-07, with no changes.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Council adopted the most recent investment policy recommended by the City Treasurer in June 2005.
There are no changes to that policy at this time.
Prepared by:
Attachments: Resolution
Investment Policy
RESOLUTION NO._
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE INVESTMENT
POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-07
WHEREAS, the City Treasurer desires approval of the Investment Policy with no changes;
and
WHEREAS, annual certification of the Investment Policy provides prudent financial
oversight.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the Investment Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held
on the day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
834763vl
City of South San Francisco Investment Policy
June 14,2006
INTRODUCTION:
The following statement is intended to provide guidelines for the "Prudent Person Standard" of
investment of the City's temporary idle cash and to outline the policies for an effective cash
management system.
Investments shall be made with judgment and care which persons of prudence and intelligence
exercise in the management of their ovm affairs considering safety of principal as well as probable
income to be derived.
The City's cash management system's goal is to accurately monitors and forecasts revenues and
expenditures enabling the City to invest funds to the fullest extent possible. The City Treasurer
attempts to obtain the highest yield possible as long as investments meet the criteria established for
safety and liquidity. This investment policy applies all City funds except retirement, pension, or
bond funds.
The investment policies and practices of the Treasurer of the City of South San Francisco are based
upon federal, state, and local laws as well as prudent money management. The primary objectives
of these policies are, in priority order:
1. To assure compliance with all federal, state, and local laws governing the investment
of monies.
2. To maintain the principal of the City's investments.
3. To remain sufficiently liquid to meet all expenses.
4. After safety and liquidity are assured, to generate the maximum amount of
investment income within the parameters of this statement of investment policy.
TREASURER'S INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES:
I. SAFETY OF PRINCIPAL is the foremost objective of the investment policy. The
Treasurer shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided with each investment
transaction. The objective is to mitigate credit risk (the loss due to failure of the
security issuer or broker) and interest rate risk (the market value of the security in the
pOlifolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates).
2. LIQUIDITY is the second most impOliant objective of the investment policy. It is
important that a portion of the POlifolio contain investments, which can be easily
liquidated with minimal, or no risk to principal and/or interest. The longest maturity
of any investment shall be five years. The POlifolio shall be structured so that
sufficient funds are readily available to meet all reasonably anticipated operating
expenses.
1
3. YIELD is the interest earned by the City Treasurer on monies invested. The City's
fund shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return (defmed as the
average return on a three month U.S. treasury bill) through various economic cycles.
Yield will be considered only after the basic requirements of safety, liquidity, and
credit quality have been met.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS:
The City is governed by the California Government Code, Section 53600 et. seq. Within the
context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized:
U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES for which the faith and credit of the U.S. are pledged for
the payment of principal and interest.
OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,
including the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), the Federal Farm
Credit Bank System (FFC), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), the Federal
National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(FHLMC), and the Telmessee Valley Authority (TV A).
BANKER'S ACCEPTANCES are bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted
by a commercial bank, which are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System.
There is a time limit (180 days) and a 20% limit of surplus money, which may be invested in
bankers' acceptances by municipalities. No more than $5.0 million may be invested in any
one institution.
COMMERCIAL PAPER must be of prime quality of the highest rating (PI by Moody's or
Al by Standard and POOl's). Eligible paper is limited to corporations organized and
operating within the U.S. and having total assets of at least $500,000,000. There are also
limitations as to the percent (15%) of the portfolio, the time of investment (270 days), and
the dollar amount invested in anyone bank or corporation ($3.0 million).
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT are not really considered investments in the tme sense of
the word. They allow the City Treasurer to select the exact amount, the day of maturity, as
well as the exact depository. (There are penalties for withdrawal of funds prior to the
original maturity date.) Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 20% shall be
invested in this type of investment for longer than one year. Any investment over the
$100.000 FDIC insurance shall be collateralized at 110% with United States Treasuries. No
more than $5.0 million may be placed in anyone institution.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (Repos) allow a purchase of securities by a local agency;
by agreement, the seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and for a
specified amount. The maturi.ty should not exceed ninety days. Repos should only be
purchased when a purchase agreement is executed with a bank in which the underlying U.S.
Treasuries pledged as security shall have a market value of at least 102% of the funds
borrowed.
2
THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND is a pooled fund managed by the state
treasurer whose permitted investments are identified in the government code. L.A.I.F.
provides for deposits up to a maximum of forty million dollars ($40,000,000). L.A.I.F.
offers high liquidity as deposits and withdrawals can be wired to and from South San
Francisco on the same day, provided the request is made before 10:00 A.M. No maximum
limit for LAIF is set by this investment policy.
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY INVESTMENT FUND established for the benefit of local
agencies, is a pooled fund managed by the San Mateo County Treasurer. Various county
monies due local agencies are deposited in the fund rather than forwarded to the local
agencies in check form.
MUTUAL FUNDS are shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management
companies, as defined by Section 23701 M of the Revenue and Taxation Code. To be
eligible for investment, these funds must strive to maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per
share at all times and:
a) Attain the highest ranking in the highest letter and numerical rating provided by
not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services; or
b) Have an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission with not less than five years experience investing in the securities
and obligations, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred
million dollars; and
c) Invest solely in those securities and obligations authorized by Sections 53601
and 53635 of the California Government Code. Where the City's Investment
Policy may be more restrictive than the State Code, the Policy authorizes
investments in mutual funds that shall have minimal investment in securities
otherwise restricted by the City's Policy. Minimal investment is defined as less
than 5 percent of the mutual fund portfolio.
Mutual fund investments shall not exceed 20% of the portfolio, with no more than 10% of the
portfolio invested with anyone institution.
MEDIUM- TERM NOTES issued by corporations organized and operating within the United
States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating
within the United States. Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated
in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating
service (Standard and POOl'S or Moody's). Purchases of medium-term notes may not exceed
10 percent of the agency's surplus money nor to be invested for longer than five years. No
more than $2.0 million may be invested in a single issuer corporation.
DEPOSITORY SERVICES
Monies must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings and loan associations,
or state or federal credit unions in the state of California. The monies may be in inactive deposits,
3
active deposits, or interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits in any institution cannot exceed
the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and surplus.
The bank, savings and loan, or federal eredit union must secure the active and inactive deposits with
eligible govenm1ent securities having a market value of at least 110% of the total amount of the
deposits.
QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS
Except for transactions with the State and County investment pools, the City shall transact
investment business only with banks, savings and loans, and with investment securities dealers as
defined in Govenm1ent Code Section 53601.5:
"The purchase by a local agency of any investment authorized pursuant to Section
5360 I or 53601.1, not purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either
from an institution licensed by the state as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section
25004 of the Corporations Code, or from a member of a federally regulated
securities exchange, from a national or state-chartered bank, from a federal or state
association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code) or from a brokerage
firm designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve bank."
The City Treasurer shall investigate institutions that wish to do business with the City in order to
determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City's
needs. Specifically, in order to achieve these objectives:
The Treasurer shall establish a list of qualified securities dealers, and shall obtain a c:ertification
submitted by all tinancial institutions wlth which the City has an investment relationship on an annual
basis. The celiification shall state that the institution has reviewed the City's investment management
plan and that it will:
. Exercise due diligence in monitoring the activities of its officers and employees engaged in
transactions with the City.
. Ensure that all of its officers and employees offering investments to the City are trained in
the precautions appropriate to public sector investments.
In order to be qualified for use by the City, a qualifying institution must have:
a) At least three years experience operating with California municipalities. In
addition, individual traders or agents representing a dealer must have a minimum
of one year of experience operating with California municipalities;
b) An inventory of trading securities of at least $10 million.
SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY OF SECURITIES
To protect against potential losses caused by the collapse of individual secuntles dealers, all
securities owned by the City. except for investments with LAIF, the San Mateo County Investment
Pool, Repurchase Agreements, CD's, mutual funds as authorized in this Policy, or Commercial
4
Paper with maturities of ten days or less shall be kept in safekeeping by a trust department of a third
party bank acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank
and by the City. These funds will be held in the City's name. All trades will be executed by
delivery vs. payment (DVP). This ensures that securities are deposited to the third party safekeeper
prior to release of the City's funds to the broker, for a purchase, and ensures that cash is deposited
with the safekeeper prior to release of the City's secmity for a sale.
COMPETITIVE PURCHASE AND SALE OF ALLOWED SECURITIES
Except for purchases in LAIF, the County Pool, or with a Mutual Fund otherwise authorized in
this policy, any purchase or sale of individual securities shall be made after soliciting at least three
quotes from authorized brokers, either verbally or in writing. The Treasurer shall make the
purchase or sale from the broker that offers the highest yield. In the case of a tie of PoI,IO or more
brokers, the Treasurer shall select by his/her choice. The Treasurer shall maintain documentation
relating to investment quotes for six months.
COLLA TERALIZA TION
Collateralization is required on two types of investments: certificates of deposit of over $100,000
(CD's) and repurchase agreements (Repos). The collateralization level must be at least 102% for
Repos and 110% for CD's.
ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There is a yearly mandated Form 700 issued by the state of California whereby all elected officials,
including the City Treasurer, must disclose all personal assets such as stocks, bonds, properties,
business entities, etc., in which said officials may be involved and which could create a conflict of
interest with the proper execution of their offices or impair their ability to make impartial decisions.
INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer and the Finance Director are responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal
control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the entity are protected from loss, theft, or
misuse. The internal control of the structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that
these objectives are met.
The Director of Finance shall establish a process for an annual independent review by an external
auditor to assure compliance with policies and procedures. The auditor shall meet with the City
Treasurer and propose possible needed changes to the investment policy and/or comment on the
diversification of the pOlifolio.
Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the elected City Treasurer
who shall be responsible for all investment transactions. The Deputy City Treasurer, appointed by
the City Treasurer. acts at the discretion and direction of the City Treasurer.
The City shall establis~1 an investment oversight committee. The committee shall consist of the City
Treasurer, the City Manager, the Finance Director, and the Assistant Finance Director as his
5
alternate, and an outside investment advisor with which the City does not do business. Ibe purpose
of the committee is to:
· Review the portfolio on a quarterly basis to ensure compliance with the City's
investment policy and the requirements of the State of California.
· Make recommendations to Council to change the investment policy where
appropriate.
· Meet as needed to review the investment portfolio as a result of changes in the
marketplace or the economic position of any company or agency that affects the
City's investments.
City TreaSUrer and Finance Director shall monitor ratings on Medium Term Notes on a monthly
basis.
The City Treasurer will report on any recommendations and/or actions taken by the investment
oversight committee in his/her quarterly reports to the City Council.
REPORTING
The Treasurer shall present to the City Council a qUaIierly report showing the types of investments,
institutions of investment, dates of maturity, amolmts of deposit, current market value for all
securities, rates of interest, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The State of
California will be supplied with yeaI'ly reports per the State Code.
WIRE TRANSFER CONFIRMATIONS
Due to the need. to preserve segregation of duties and checks and balances, all non-recurri.ng,
outgoing wire transactions initiated by the City Treasurer or a Deputy Treasurer appointed by the
City Treasurer shall be confirmed by the bank with a second person, either a Deputy Treasurer or
within the Finance Department, prior to the completion of that wire transfer. Recurring/repetitive
wire transactions, such as with LAIF, the County Investment Pool, or to meet regular debt service
payments. may be exempted provided that a list of recurring wire transfers is established with the
bank and that both the City Treasurer and the Finance Director approve the list.
POLICY REVIEW
This investment policy shall be reviewed annually to ensure its consistency with. the overall
objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, and yield. The policy should also be relevant to
current law, financial and economic trends, and should meet the needs of the City of South San
Francisco.
6
~'t\\ s~
S
(~ g
~ if;
v 0
~ll~~~\~ S taff R~ort
AGENDA ITEM #4
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sharon Ranals, Director of Recreation and Community Services
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Federal Surface Transportation
Funds through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Transportation for Livable
Communities Program for the BART Linear Park and Committing the Necessary Local
Match for the Project(s) and Stating the Assurance of the City of South San Francisco to
Complete the Project
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an application
for $1,250,000 in Federal Surface Tlransportation Funds through the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission's Transportation for Livable Communities Program for construction of a segment of
the BART Linear Park, Chestnut to the South San Francisco BART station, committing the
necessary local match for the project(s), and stating the assurance of the City of South San
Francisco to complete the project.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The concept ofa "bikeway" has been developed in conjunction with the extension of BART service to
Millbrae, and the creation of a swath of open space on top of and adjacent to the underground BART
tube and stations. The South San Francisco portion of the bikeway has been expanded to a Linear Park,
which would include recreational and landscape amenities. The Linear Park has been included in the
city's long-term planning efforts and General Plan. As the Council is aware, the City approved an
agreement with BART and SamTrans for construction, operation, and maintenance of the Bike
Path/Linear Park.
The MTC has issued a call for projects for the Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) Capital
Program. Applications are due by June 23,2006. The purpose of the TLC Capital Program is to fund
transportation infrastructure improvements to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit trips; support a
community's larger infill development or revitalization effort; and provide for a wider range of
transportation choices, improved intemal mobility, and stronger sense of place. Typical TLC capital
projects include new or improved pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, transit access improvement,
pedestrian plazas, and streetscapes. The Linear Park project is very appropriate for this program.
Staff Report
Subject: Application to MTC for Linear Park Funding
June 14,2006
Page 2
The City Council may recall that the city successfully applied to the MTC for a planning grant in 2001,
and received an award of $75,000 to fhnd the development of the Linear Park Master P1cm. The Master
Plan was approved in March of2003, and continues to be refined based on land use developments, and
agency and community needs. In 2004 the city was successful in applying for $1.932 million in funding
through the TLC program for construction of Phase I of the Linear Park, from the San Bruno BART
Station to Orange Avenue. The agency views large, significant proj ects which are carefully phased for
incremental construction very favorably.
The intent of the grant program is to make possible quality oflife amenities that soften the impacts of
higher density land use, which the MTC supports to accomplish transportation efficiencies. The MTC
emphasizes linkages, connectivity, partnerships between agencies, multi-city benefits, and places great
value in evaluating project merit on public process and ample outreach and community input. The
Linear Park project relates land use with transportation, and particularly in light of the fact that the
Master Plan was funded by the MTC's planning grant, and Phase I was funded, the project has an
excellent chance of receiving additional funding. An additional criteria for ranking projects is for the
applicant to have a proven track record of delivering funded outcomes, which the city has.
Once again, the city will use Callander Associates as consultant for the preparation of a professional,
competitive grant application, to include accurate construction cost estimates, graphics, and design
information. Their track record for collaborating on successful funding requests has been outstanding.
FUNDING:
The total projected cost of the 2.85 mile Linear Park is estimated at $6.5 million. Grant requests may be
from $500,000 to $3 million, but a match of 11.5% must be offered. Larger requests may have less
chance of being approved. The estimated construction cost for Phase ill is $2,000,000. Staff is planning
to submit an application with a 60/40 split. The request amount will be $1,250,000, with a city match of
$750,000. The match would be funded by developer fees from the SummerHill project.
CONCLUSION:
This application for funding through the TLC Program is for the third and final phase of the
Linear Park, Chestnut to the South Sari Francisco BART station. This is the tenth application
that will have been submitted for the Linear Park, nine applications have been successful in
generating $4,018,117 to date. Staff is optimistic that the entire project can be funded using this
strategy, combined with developer park in-lieu fees as necessary for matching funds.
By:
gMq; Ir&e$
Sharon Ranals
Director of Recreation and Community
Services
Approved:
~
Attachment:
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
THROUGH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION'S TRANSPORTATION FOR LN ABLE
COMMUNITIES PROGRAM FOR THE BART LINEAR PARK
AND COMMITTIl\lG THE NECESSARY LOCAL MATCH
FOR THE PROJECT(S) AND STATING THE ASSURANCE
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO COMPLETE
THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Safe Aceountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act:
A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Public Law 109-59, August 10,2005) continues
the Surface Transportation Program, and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to SAFETEA-LU, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, eligible proj ect sponsors wishing to receive federal transportation grants for a
project shall submit an application first with the appropriate metropolitan transportation
planning organization (MPO) for review and consideration in the MPO's Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission is the San Francisco
Bay Area's MPO; and
WHEREAS, the City is an eligible project sponsor for federal transportation
funds; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to receive federal transportation funds through
MTC's Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) Program's capital grants for the
following project: BART Linear Park, Phase III, Chestnut to the South San Francisco
BART station.
WHEREAS, MTC requires a resolution stating the following:
1. the commitment of necessary local matching funds of at least 11.5%; and
2. that the sponsor understands that the federal funding through the TLC program is
fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected
to be funded through the TLC program; and
3. the assurance of the sponsor to complete the project as described in the application,
and if approved, as programmed in MTC's TIP; and
4. that the sponsor understands that funds must be obligated by June 30, 2009 for TLC
capital projects, or the project may be removed from the program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of
South San Francisco that the City Council is authorized to proceed with the federal-aid
process with Caltrans for TLC funding in the amount of$1,250,000 for the BART Linear
Park; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco, by adopting this resolution hereby states that:
1. the City will provide not less than 11.5% in local matching funds; and
2. the City understands that the TLC Program funding for the project is fixed at the
amount awarded, and that any cost increases must be funded by the City from local
matching funds, and that the City does not expect any cost increases to be funded
through the TLC program; and
3. the Linear Park will be built as described in this resolution and submitted application
and, if approved, for the amount shown in the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) with obligation
occurring within the timeframe established below; and
4. the program funds will be obligated by June 30, 2009 for TLC capital projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted
to MTC.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
~'t\\ s~
&1
~ . ~\i..\
(0 n
>-< ~I
~ C")
v 0
~4l1FO~~~ S taff R~ort
AGENDA ITEM #5
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sharon Ranals, Director of Recreation and Community Services
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Federal Surface Transportation
Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding for
the BART Linear Park and Committing the Necessary Non-Federal Match for the
Project(s) and Stating the Assurance of the City of South San Francisco to Complete the
Project
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an application
for $537,000 in Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement Program funding for the BART Linear Park, from Orange Avenue to
Chestnut Avenue, committing the necessary non-federal match for the project(s) and stating the
assurance of the City of South San Francisco to complete the project.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
In November of2005 the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) announced a call for
applications for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Approximately $2.5 million in Federal Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) was available in that cycle of funding for San Mateo County.
Funds must be encumbered by FY 2008/09. Project applications were to be reviewed by staff and
ranked by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BP AC) of C/CAG, serving as the
administrator for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).
It is important to note that C/CAG "pre-qualifies" projects for funding. Technically an application is
then submitted to MTC, hence the wording in the title and resolution of this report. MTC requires the
specific language in the attached resolution.
The city retained Callander Associates to work with Engineering and Recreation staff to submit an
application for Phase II of the Linear Park, Orange Avenue to Chestnut. Although applications of up to
one million dollars were allowed, the eity adopted a strategy of applying for the lesser amount of
$537,000, as encouraged by C/CAG staff, to allow more projects in the county to receive some funding.
Staff Report
Subject: Acceptance of Funds for Linear Park
June 14,2006
Page 2
The application guidelines for this program required that only transportation improvements could be
funded - with no portion of grant funds to be expended on recreational components or amenities.
Because the source of this funding is federal, a local match of at least 11.5% is required. However, a
greater match is favorably considered by the scoring committee as a demonstration of the city's
commitment to the project, and their initiative in securing additional funds. The application was
therefore structured to apply grant funds to the bike path portion of this segment only. Other funds
previously awarded by C/CAG through the Transit Oriented Development (TaD) program as incentives
for the SummerHill and Fairfield projects were identified as local match. These sources are to be used
toward the recreational aspects of the project, which includes a dog park just north of the Boys and Girls
Club parking lot.
A total of 26 project applications were received in response to the call for projects, with a total of
approximately $10 million in requests from fifteen (15) jurisdictions. The applications were
preliminarily scored by staff. Seven projects with the highest scores were inspected by the BP AC
Committee. The next six projects were presented to the BP AC by their agency sponsors. South San
Francisco's Linear Park project was ranked as #1 by the BPAC Committee, and approved for $537,000
in funding.
An agreement with BART and SamTrans for construction, operation, and maintenance of the Bike
Path/Linear Park was authorized by the City Council on May 24, 2006. With that important milestone
accomplished, the city can proceed to complete the plans for the funded portions of the Linear Park.
Final cost estimates for construction are in progress. Construction of this Phase is scheduled for
2007/08. It should be noted that the use of federal funds requires very specific regulations to be
observed in the planning, approval, bidding, permitting, contracting, financial audit, and CEQA and
NEP A environmental clearance for the project. While these requirements are rigorous, the significant
amount of federal money that has been awarded for Phase I ($1.932 million) and Phase n ($537,000) are
well worth the effort to comply.
FUNDING:
The total projected cost of the 2.85 mile Linear Park is estimated at $6.5 million (as estimated in 2003).
To date $4,018,117 in grant funds have been secured for the Linear Park Master Plan, Orange Avenue
intersection, Spruce intersection, Phase I (San Bruno BART Station to Orange), and Phase II (Orange
Avenue to Chestnut). The city will continue to submit applications for funding for which the Linear
Park is eligible, as per the application for Transportation for Livable Communities funds also on the City
Council agenda for June 14,2006.
CONCLUSION:
If approved, this action will authorize the City Manager to accept $ 5 3 7,000 from the Federal
Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
Program for the Linear Park Phase II, and commits the necessary non-federal local match of not
less than 11.5% for the project. By aceepting these funds, the city agrees to complete the project
Staff Report
Subject: Acceptance of Funds for Linear Park
June 14,2006
Page 3
as described in the application, and to encumber the funds before June 30 of the fiscal year that
the project is included in MTC's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), in this case
2007/08.
By:
ffia ft11 r. ~&d,
Sharon Ranals
Director of Recreation and Community
Services
APProve~1 · ~
M.Nag
City Manager
Attachment:
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE BART
LINEAR PARK AND COMMITTING THE NECESSARY
NON-FEDERAL MATCH FOR THE PROJECT(S) AND
STATING THE ASSURANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act:
A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA) (Public Law 109-59, August 10,2005) continues the
Surface Transportation Program (23 US.C. S 133 and the Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 US.C. S 149); and
WHEREAS, the SAFETEA legislation will guide STP, CMAQ, and TE
programming until a SAFE TEA bill is authorized; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to SAFETEA, and the regulations promulgated thereunder,
eligible project sponsors wishing to receive Surface Transportation Program or
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program grants for a project shall
submit an application first with the appropriate metropolitan transportation planning
organization (MPO), for review and inclusion in the MPO's Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission is the MPO for the San
Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City is an eligible project sponsor for Surface Transportation
Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to submit an application to MTC for funds from the
Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
Program in fiscal years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 for the following project: BART
Linear Park, Phase II, Chestnut to Orange Avenue.
WHEREAS, MTC requires, as part ofthe application, a resolution stating the
following:
I. the commitment of necessary local matching funds of at least 11.47%; and
2. that the sponsor understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding is fixed at the programmed
amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected to be funded with Surface
Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
Program funds; and
3. the assurance of the sponsor to complete the project as described in the application,
and if approved, as programmed in MTC's TIP; and
4. that the sponsor understands that funds must be obligated by June 30 of the year that
the project is programmed for in the TIP, or the project may be removed from the
program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco that the City Council is authorized to execute and file an application
for funding under the Surface Transportation Program or the Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality Improvement Program of SAFE TEA in the amount of $537,000 for the
Linear Park; and
BE IT FUR THER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco by adopting this resolution does hereby state that:
1. the City will provide not less than $62,000 in non-federal matching funds; and
2. the City understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding for the project is fixed at
$537,000, and that any cost increases must be funded by the City from local matching
funds, and that the City does not expect any cost increases to be funded with Surface
Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
Program funds; and
3. the Linear Park will be built as described in this resolution and, if approved, for the
amount shown in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) with obligation occurring within the timeframe
established below; and
4. the program funds are expected to be obligated by June 30 ofthe year the project is
programmed for in the TIP.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City is an eligible sponsor ofprojects in
the STP, CMAQ, and TE Program;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City is authorized to submit an
application for STP, CMAQ, and TE funds for the Linear Park; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is no legal impediment to the City
making applications for STP, CMAQ, and TE funds; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is no pending or threatened litigation
which might in any way adversely affect the proposed project, or the ability of the City to
deliver such proj ect, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy ofthis resolution will be transmitted
to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application; and
BE IT FUR THER RESOLVED that the MTC is requested to support the
application for the project described in the resolution and to program the project, if
approved, in MTC's TIP.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the fi:>regoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a me:eting
held on the day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-
:\\'t\\ s~
S
(~ 8
~ ~
tJ 0
'4l~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #6
DATE:
June 14,2006
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR
STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
approve an agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide staff augmentation servkes not to
exceed $95,000.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
In October 2005, staff issued a Request For Proposal (RFP) for staff augmentation services for staff
assistance in development review services and CIP projects. The request was posted on the City's
website, an ArchitectJEngineer Consultants Information Network website, as well as provided to
three consultants: CSG Consultants, Wilsey Ham Engineers, and Carollo Engineers. The only
proposal received was from the firm of CSG Consultants, Inc. Staff reviewed their proposal and
found that they have the staff and resources to meet the needs of the City for staff augmentation.
On December 14, 2005, the Council approved a reduced agreement with CSG to provide these staff
augmentation services until March 2006 and instructed staff to re-advertise in order to obtain
multiple proposals from various firms.
In January 2006, staff issued a new request for proposal for staff augmentation services. This request
was posted on the City's website, an ArchitectJEngineer Consultants Information Network website,
provided to CELSOC (Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California), published twice in
the San Mateo Times newspaper, as well as provided to four other firms: CSG Consultants, Wilsey
Ham Engineers, Beton Inc., and Carollo Engineers. Proposals were subsequently received from the
following three firms in response to the City's widely publicized RFP:
· Wallace Group, Martinez
· CSG Consultants, Inc., San Mateo
· Freyer & Laureta, Inc., San Mateo
Staff Report
Subject: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH CSG CONSULTANTS, INe. FOR STAFF
AUGMENTATION SERVICES
Page 2 of 2
A City Engineering panel interviewed all three respondents and evaluated each firm for their
capabilities. The panel utilized an objective scoring system to rank the three consultant firms.
The panel selected CSG Consultants, Inc. for their understanding of the development process,
experience with municipal functions, experience of proposed staff, and capital improvement project
experience. Staff subsequently met with the selected firm to confirm scope and negotiated a fee of
$95,000 for continued staff augmentation through the first half of FY 06-07.
CSG Consultants, Inc. will assist the City with staff augmentation services consisting of professional
services for development review services, capital improvement projects, as well as additional
services authorized on an as-needed basis. The staff augmentation is intended to provide support to
the Engineering Division until the newly approved position of Senior Civil Engineer is filled and the
new employee has completed a transition period to become fully effective in processing development
applications and capital improvement projects.
FUNDING
Funding for the agreement will be provided from the Capital Improvement Program, development
impact fees, the redevelopment agency, and developer contributions.
CONCLUSION
A ward of the consultant services contract to CSG Consultants, Inc. will provide for flexibility in
staffing levels to meet the Division's workload until the position of Senior Civil Engineer has been
filled and has become fully functional.
BY~
Marty Van Duyn
Assistant City Manager
''\.,''
Attachments: Resolution
Consultant Agreement
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION A Vii ARDING AN AGREEMENT FOR
STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO CSG
CONSULTANTS, INC. OF SAN MATEO IN THE
AMOUNT OF $95,000.00
WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of an agreement between CSG Consultants, Inc.
and the City of South San Francisco for staff augmentation services in an amount not to exceed
$ 95,000.00; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds for this project are included in the City's Capital Improvement
Program, development impact fees, redevelopment agency and developer contributions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby awards the agreement for staff augmentation services to CSG
Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $ 95,000.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the
contract on behalf of the City of South San Francisco.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held
on the day of _, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND
CSG CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED
Staff Augmentation Services
THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of South San
Francisco ("City") and CSG Consultants, Incorporated ("Consultant") (together sometimes refermd to as the
"Parties") as of , 2006 (thl3 "Effective Date").
Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant
shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Scope of Services, attached hereto and
incorporated herein, at the time and place and in the manner specified therein. In the event of a conflict in
or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail.
1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective DatB and shall
end on December 31, 2006, and Consultant shall complete the services described in
Exhibit A prior to that da.te, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or
extended, as provided for in Section 9. The time provided to Consultant to complete the
services required by this Agreement shall not affect the City's right to terminate the
Agreement, as provided for in Section 9.
1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this
Agreement in the mannl3r and according to the standards of quality normally observed by a
competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the
geographical area in which Consultant practices its profession.
1.3 AssiQnment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform
services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any
time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such pElrsons,
Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City,
reassign such person or persons.
1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement as may be masonably necessary to meet the standard of performance
provided in Section 1.1 above and to satisfy Consultant's obligations hereunder.
Section 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant at the rates set forth in Exhibit B,
Consultant's Standard Fees, the amount of $95,000 notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be
contained in Consultant's proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurrecl under this
Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant's proposal regarding the
amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. In case of a conflict in the hourly rates indicated
elsewhere, those rates shown in Exhibit B shall prevail. City and Consultant mutually agree that additional
resources may be allocated to particular tasks, utilizing the classifications and rates shown on the listing of
Standard Fees, provided that the totallirnit of compensation is not exceeded.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 1 of 17
City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner
set forth herein. The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consulta.nt for
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner
specified herein.
Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City to Consultant under this
Agreement is based upon Consultant's Bstimated costs of providing the services required hereunder,
including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consultant. Consequently, tile parties
further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the costs of contributions to any pensions
and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors may be eligible. City
therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond compensation required under this )\.greement.
2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices, not more often than once a month during the
term of this Agreement, based on the cost for services performed and reimbursable costs
incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information:
· Serial identificajtions of progress bills; Le., Progress Bill NO.1 for the first invoice,
etc.;
· The beginning and ending dates of the billing period;
· A Task Summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior
billings, the total due this period, the balance available under the Agreement, and
the percentage of completion;
· At City's option, for each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time
entries or time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing
the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and
each reimbursable expense;
· The total numbBr of hours of work performed under the Agreement by Consultant
and each employee, agent, and subcontractor of Consultant performing services
hereunder, as well as a separate notice when the total number of hours of work by
Consultant and any individual employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant
reaches or exceeds 800 hours, which shall include an estimate of the time
necessary to complete the work described in Exhibit A;
· The Consultant's signature.
2.2 Monthlv Payment. City shall make payments, based on invoices received, for services
satisfactorily performed" and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shall have
thirty (30) days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements
above to pay Consultant.
2.3 Final Payment. City shall pay the last 10% of the total sum due pursuant to this
Agreement within sixty (60) days after completion of the services and submittal to City of a
final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed.
2.4 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to
this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 . Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 2 of 17
incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make
no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pursuant to this AgreemEmt, unless
the Agreement is modified pursuant to Subsection 9.3.
In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum
amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement,
unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly
executed change order or amendment.
2.5 Hourlv Fees. Fees for work performed by Consultant on an hourly basis shall not exceed
the amounts shown on the payment schedule contained within Exhibit B. If, however, the
term of this Agreement extends beyond one year, mutually agreed, updated hourly rates
may be incorporated within Exhibit B upon approval of City by a properly executed change
order or amendment.
2.6 Reimbursable Expenses. Reimbursable expenses are specified in Exhibit B, and shall
not exceed five hundrecl ($500.00) without previous written consent. Expenses not listed
in Exhibit B are not chargeable to City. Reimbursable expenses are included in the total
amount of compensation provided under this Agreement.
2.7 Payment of Taxes. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes
incurred under this Agreiement and any similar federal or state taxes.
2.8 Payment upon Termination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 9, the City shall compensate the Consultant for all
outstanding costs and reimbursable expenses incurred for work satisfactorily completed as
of the date of written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and
timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to that date.
2.9 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any
services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of
authorization from the Contract Administrator.
Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole
cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services
required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed
in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein.
City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be
reasonably necessary for Consultant's use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and
the information in possession of the City., The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those faciilities shall
be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility that may involve
incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-distance telephone or other
communication charges, vehicles, and mproduction facilities.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 3 of 17
Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement,
Consultant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the types and
amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may
arise from or in connection with the pertormance of the work hereunder by the Consultant and its agents,
representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Consultant shall
provide Certificates of Insurance, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, indicatin!~ that
Consultant has obtained or currently maintains insurance that meets the requirements of this section and
under forms of insurance satisfactory, in all respects, to the City. Consultant shall maintain the insurance
policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be
included in the Consultant's bid. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work: on any
subcontract until Consultant has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s) and
provided evidence thereof to City. Verification of the required insurance shall be submitted and made part
of this Agreement prior to execution.
4.1 Workers' Compensation. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain
Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for any
and all persons emploYEid directly or indirectly by Consultant. The Statutory Workers'
Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of
not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per accident. In the alternative,
Consultant may rely on a self-insurance program to meet those requirements, but only if
the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor
Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the
Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the Contract Administrator. The insurer, if
insurance is provided, 01: the Consultant, if a program of self-insurance is provided, shall
waive all rights of subro~~ation against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and
volunteers for loss arising from work pertormed under this Agreement.
4.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liabilitv Insurance.
4.2.1 General reQuirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain
commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this
Agreement in an amount not less than ONE MilLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00)
per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work
contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an
Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to bE~
pertormed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least
twice the requimd occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be
limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury,
including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from
activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non-
owned automobiles.
4.2.2 Minimum scope of coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrE3nce form
CG 0001 or GL 0002 (most recent editions) covering comprehensive General
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 . Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 4 of 17
Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad
Form ComprehEmsive General Liability. Automobile coverage shall be at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 ('3d. 12/90)
Code 8 and 9. INo endorsement shall be attached limiting the coverage,
4.2.3 Additional reQuirements. Each of the following shall be included in thB
insurance coverage or added as a certified endorsement to the policy:
a. The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not
on a claims-made basis.
b. Any failure of Consultant to comply with reporting provisions of the policy
shall not affect coverage provided to City and its officers, employees,
agents, and volunteers.
4.3 Professional Liability Insurance.
4.3.1 General reQuir1ements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain
for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for
licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount
not less than OI~E MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) covering the licensed
professionals' errors and omissions. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall
not exceed $150,000 per claim.
4.3.2 Claims-made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional
liability coverage is written on a claims-made form:
a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the
date of the Agreement.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be
provided for at least five years after completion of the Agreement or the
work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates.
c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another
claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of
this Agreement, Consultant must provide extended reporting coverage for
a minimum of five years after completion of the Agreement or the work.
The City shall have the right to exercise, at the Consultant's sole cost and
expense, any extended reporting provisions of the policy, if the Consultant
cancels or does not renew the coverage.
d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City
prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 5 of 17
4.4 All Policies ReQuirements.
4.4.1 Acceptabilitv I:>f insurers. All insurance required by this section is to be placed
with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A: VII.
4.4.2 Verification of coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement,
Consultant shall furnish City with complete certified copies of all policies, including
complete certified copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and certified
endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to
bind coverage on its behalf.
4.4.3 Notice of reduction in or cancellation of coverage. A certified endorsement
shall be attached to all insurance obtained pursuant to this Agreement stating that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in
coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. In the event that any
coverage required by this section is reduced, limited, cancelled, or materially
affected in any other manner, Consultant shall provide written notice to City at
Consultant's earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than ten (10)
working days after Consultant is notified of the change in coverage.
4.4.4 Additional insured; primary insurance. City and its officers, employees, agents,
and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the
following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant,
including the insured's general supervision of Consultant; products and completed
operations of Consultant, as applicable; premises owned, occupied, or used by
Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by the Consultant in the
course of providing services pursuant to this Agreement. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City or its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
A certified endorsement must be attached to all policies stating that coverage is
primary insurance with respect to the City and its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City shall be
called upon to Gontribute to a loss under the coverage.
4.4.5 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall disclose to and
obtain the approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles before
beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agmement.
During the period covered by this Agreement, only upon the prior express written
authorization of Contract Administrator, Consultant may increase such deductibles
or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, employees, agents, and
volunteers. The Contract Administrator may condition approval of an increase in
deductible or sl3lf-insured retention levels with a requirement that Consultant
procure a bond, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtt
NovElmber 2005
Page 6 of 17
administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of
them.
4.4.6 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the
requirements stated herein.
4.4.7 Variation. The City may approve a variation in the foregoing insurance
requirements, upon a determination that the coverage, scope, limits, and forms of
such insurance are either not commercially available, or that the City's interests
are otherwise fully protected.
4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide
or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time
herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the following remediE3s, which
are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for
Consultant's breach:
· Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such
insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
· Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that
becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment,
until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or
· Terminate this Agreement.
Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITIES. Consultant shall
indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the City, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions,
damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to
property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole
or in part, by the willful misconduct or ne'Qligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees,
subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by not meeting the normal
standard in the Bay Area for the quality or character of their work or other negligent acts or omissions. The
foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or
violation of law arises wholly from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers,
employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its employees, subcontractor, or
agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is
understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set
forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and
endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this
indemnification and hold harmless c1aus13. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to
any damages or claims for damages whE3ther or not such insurance policies shall have been detElrmined to
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 Irtf
November 2005
Page 7 of 17
apply. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this
Section and that it is a material element of consideration.
In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing s€~rvices
under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees
Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions
for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the
payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of
City.
Section 6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties, any
controversies between Consultant and City regarding the construction or application of this Agreement, and
claims arising out of this contract or its breach, shall be submitted to mediation within thirty (30) days of the
written request of one Party after the service of that request on the other Party.
6.1. The Parties may agree on one mediator. If they cannot agree on one mediator, the Party
demanding mediation sl1all request that the Superior Court of San Mateo appoint a
mediator. The mediation meeting shall not exceed one day or eight (8) hours. The Parties
may agree to extend the time allowed for mediation under this Agreement.
6.2. The costs of mediation shall be borne by the Parties equally.
6.3 Mediation under this section is a condition precedent to filing an action in any court.
Section 7. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.
7.1 Independent Contractl::lr. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the
right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subparagraph 1.3;
however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant
accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other
City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant
and any of its.employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this
Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to WaiVE! any and
all claims to, any compE!Ilsation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including
but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System
(PERS) as an employeEl of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for
employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
7.2 Consultant No A!:)ent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an
agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this A.greement
to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 . Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 8 of 17
Section 8.
Section 9.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
8.1
Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.
8.2
Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with
all laws applicable to thl3 performance of the work hereunder.
8.3
Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by
fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors
shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of
such fiscal assistance program.
8.4
Licenses and Permits,~ Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and
its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications,
and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective
professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its
employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect
at all times during the tmm of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are
legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing,
Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this
Agreement valid Business Licenses from City.
8.5
Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the
basis of a person's raCE!, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or
disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any
employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant
in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this
Agreement. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws,
policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in
employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this
Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required
of Consultant thereby.
Consultant shall includE! the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by
the Contract Administrator or this Agreement.
TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION.
9.1
Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon 30
days' written notification to Consultant.
Consultant may cancel this Agreement upon 30 days' written notice to City and shall
include in such notice the reasons for cancellation.
In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services
performed to the effective date of termination; City, however, may condition payment of
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 9 of 17
such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City any or all documents, photographs,
computer software, video and audio tapes, and other materials provided to Consultant or
prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement.
9.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this
Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1.1. Any such extension shall require a
written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and
agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide
Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this
Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no
obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred
during the extension period.
Force Maieure. The time for performance of services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable caUSHS beyond
the control and without tlhe fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not rElstricted
to, acts of God or of any public enemy, acts of the government, fires, earthquakes, floods,
epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, and freight embargoes if Consultant shall,
within ten (10) days of the commencement of such condition, notify Contract Officer who
shall thereupon ascertain the facts and extent of any necessary delay, and extend the time
for performing services for period of enforced delay when and if Contract Officer's
determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement.
9.3 Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a written document signed
by all the parties.
9.4 Assh:mment and Subcl:mtractinQ. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this
Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a
determination of Consultant's unique personal competence, experience, and spElcialized
personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this
Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant.
Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written
approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not subcontract any po/1ion of the
performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted
in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator.
9.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all
provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive
the termination of this A9reement.
9.6 Options upon Breach Ibv Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms
of this Agreement, City's remedies shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
9.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement;
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 11f
November 2005
Pa!~e 10 of 17
9.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any
other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement;
9.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not
finished by Consultant; and/or
9.6.4 Charge Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work
described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that
City would havH paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had
completed the work.
Section 10. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.
10.1 Records Created as Piart of Consultant's Performance. All reports, data, maps,
models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications,
records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that
Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to thH matters
covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver
those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and
agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described
above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are
not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and Consultant agree that, until
final approval by City, aU data, plans, specifications, reports and other documents are
confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both
parties unless required by law.
10.2 Consultant's Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and allledgl3rs, books
of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents
evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged
to the City under this A9reement for a minimum of three (3) years, or for any longer period
required by law, from th,e date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement.
10.3 Inspection and Audit (If Records. Any records or documents that Section 102 of this
Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit,
and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written mquest of
the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds
expended under this Agreement exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), the
Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the
request of City or as pari of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final
payment under the AgrE~ement.
Section 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
11.1 Attornevs' Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for
declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the pmvailing
party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to any other relief to which
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 lif
November 2005
Pa!~e 11 of 17
that party may be entitlHd. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a
separate action brought for that purpose.
11.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this
Agreement, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the
state courts of California in the County San Mateo or in the United States District Court for
the First District of California.
11.3 Severabilitv. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this
Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so
adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any
provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this
Agreement.
11.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this
Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term
of this Agreement.
11.5 Successors and Assi~ The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of
and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties.
11.6 Use of Recvcled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written
studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or
less cost than virgin paper.
11.7 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within
the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place
Consultant in a "conflict of interest," as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act,
codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq.
Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in thlis
Agreement that would viiolate California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.
Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12)
months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an
employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve months,
Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this
Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of
Government Code &1090 et.seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be
entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including
reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any
sums paid to the Consultant. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, it
may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of Government Code & 1090 and, if
applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the State of California.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 12 of 17
11.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or
interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials.
11.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Mr. Ray Razavi
("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through Ule Contract
Administrator or his or tler designee.
11.10 Notices. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:
Mr. Richard Mao, P.E., President
CSG, Consultants, Inc.
1700 S. Amphlett Blvd., 3rd Floor
San Mateo, CA 94402
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:
City Clerk
City of South San Francisco
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
11.11 Professional Seal. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator,
the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of
construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professional
responsible for the report/design preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled "Seal and
Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility," as in the following example.
Not Applicable for this Agreement
Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with
report/design responsibility.
11.12 InteQration. This Agrel3ment, including the scope of work attached hereto and
incorporated herein as j:xhibit A, represents the entire and integrated agreement between
City and Consultant amI supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or a!~reements,
either written or oral.
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 . Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Pa!~e 13 of 17
11,13 Counterparts. This A~lreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.
The Parties have executed this AgreemHnt as of the Effective Date.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
CONSULTANT
Barry M. Nagel, City Manager
Richard Mao, P.E., President
Attest:
Sylvia Payne, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
Consulting SeNices Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Consultants, Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Page 14 of 17
EXHIBIT A
City of South San Francisco
STAFF AUGMENTATION & ADDITIONAL SERVICES (as authorized)
TASK No.1 - STAFF AUGMENTATION
Provide Staff Augmentation Services such as:
· Capital Improvement Program and Project Management
· Development Review
· Inspection and Resiclent Construction Engineer Services
· Grant and Permit Processing, Agency Approvals
· Land Surveying
· Geotechnical ServicE~s
TASK No.2 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES (as authorized)
Assist the City staff with proj,ects / programs as assigned, for example:
· Implementation of thE~ Lindenville Area stormwater improvements
· Review / analysis of impact fees
· Completion of Recycled Water feasibility study
CSG DELlVERABLES: Quarterly program-level status report(s) for the City
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Pa~le 15 of 17
EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT'S STANDARD FEES
STAN DARD
ENGINEERING FEES
Vice President
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Project Manager
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Resident Engineer
Senior Construction Inspector
Construction Inspector/Office Engineer
Senior Planner
Technical Writer
Design Supervisor
Senior CAD Designer
CAD Designer/Engineering Technician
Administrative Support
Land Surveyors - 2-person crew
Additional Costs
Reproduction:
Mileage (if applicable)
Other Items:
Cost + 15%
$0.50/mile
Cost + 15%
Hourly Rates
$175
$145
$130
$125
$115
$98
$125 - $150
$95 - $110
$75 - $90
$115
$98
$98
$88
$70
$70
$190
Note: Personnel assigned as "Staff Augmentation," on a full time basis for an extended
period, may be charged at a reduced rate as mutually agreed by City and Consultant.
EFFECTIVE: 01/06 Rev. 1
Consulting SeNices Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 - Dee '06 rev 2 rtf
November 2005
Pa!~e 16 of 17
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE CERTIFICATES
Consulting Services Agreement between the
City of South San Francisco and CSG Inc.
Staff Augmentation Agr May '06 . Dee '06 rev 2 111
November 2005
Pa(~e 17 of 17
~'t\\ s~
m
:<.. - ~\-j,.\
o Cl:)
:>-< ....
E;:l ~
v 0
'4l1FO"~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #7
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: DEMOLITION OF THE GREENHOUSE STRUCTURES
PROJECT NO. 51-13232-0527
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the Demolition ofthe Greenhouse
Structures Project as complete.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
In January of this year Council approved a contract with the Ferma Corp. to remove the Greenhouse
structures in Orange Memorial Park. Work was completed by May 1,2006, however, residual
amounts of glass remaining in the soil caused staff to reject the work until further measures were
implemented to remove it. Special sifting equipment was brought in and the glass has now been
removed to an acceptable level. Now that the structures are removed the land can be opened up to
farming until the funding for the park improvements is obtained. Ted Cerruti, who has been the
greenhouse herb grower during the past years, has entered into a revised agreement with the City to
lease the land for open land farming.
FUNDING:
The demolition work was completed at a total cost of$378,362.00, which was $206,638.00 less than
the awarded amount of $585,000.00. Council may recall that staff had hoped the waste materials
could be characterized in such a way as to be taken to a less hazardous waste site to reduce costs.
Part ofFerma's proposal to the City was to share savings with the City if this could be accomplished,
and they were successful.
Staff Report
Subject: Demolition of Greenhouse Structures Project
Page 2
CONCLUSION:
Acceptance of the project will provide authorization for staff to file a Notice of Completion.
The demolition of the greenhouses has eliminated the liability issue from the aging structures and
will be a major step toward the final goal of expanding Orange Memorial Park
r,
..j~
B~- t))t,/ '-.
Terry White (
Director of Pue ic Works
R TH/ TW
G :\PROJECTS\PW Greenhouse Dem,./acceptancestaffreport.doc
-
:'0 't \\ S:1N'
~~
(0 n
>< -
~ ~
v 0
C'4lIFOp,.~"'~
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #8
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: ANNUAL NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) COUNTY WIDE STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT
PLAN GENERAL PROGRAM AND FEE
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution requesting that the San
Mateo County Board of Supervisors use the San Mateo County Flood Control District
as the funding mechanism to support the Countywide National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) G(~neral Program.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Clean Water Act,
imposed regulations that mandate local government to control and reduce the amount of
stormwater pollution runoff into receiving waters of the United States. The State has taken
the lead position with regard to this mandate and the local agencies within San Mateo
County have formed an area wide plan to implement the mandate.
The initial Storm water Management Plan included tasks, schedules, and parties responsible
for implementation during the initial five-year NPDES permit period (i.e., 1993-1998) and
since that time have renewed permits, amended language, and eventually adopted new
permits in order to better comply with the State Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) requirements through the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Program (STOPPP) Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit process. STOPPP's Technical
Advisory Committee submitted a San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan
to the RWQCB and after a Public hearing, approved the renewed NPDES permit which
expired July 20, 2004. An updated plan has since been submitted to the RWQCB but has
yet to be approved. In the interim the plan continues.
The General Program encompasses those efforts undertaken for the benefit of all twenty-
one agency co-permittees involved with the implementation of the Stormwater
Management Plan, and adherence to the conditions set forth under the Countywide
Staff Report
Subject:
Annual National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Stormwater Management Plan General Program and Fee
Page 2
NPDES Discharge Permit. Each City within the County participates in the plan and the
County regulates the plan through a collection of a parcel fee. This fee, as adopted in
1992, established fees and CPI increase formulas. The 2006-2007 NPDES General
Program Budget is $1,404,549. Basic annual charges and historical dates are more
specifically detailed within the resolution attached. They are broken down into two pieces.
One is the set basic fee, which has never changed, and the other is an additional charge
which is adjusted every year by the CPI. These fees are separate and apart from the City
fee per parcel for City management of the STOPPP program and are collected through the
County Flood Control District.
FUNDING
Funding will be provided from the San Mateo Countywide General Program Budget Year
14, which is $1,404,549 financed by a Countywide parcei fee levied against residential
land users, commercial/retail/manufacturing/industrialland users, and miscellaneous land
users. For Year 14 activities, combined single-family residential land users are charged
$6.12 per parcel to establish the base rate. Miscellaneous, Condominium, Agriculture, and
Vacant parcels are charged $3.06/APN; all other land uses have a base rate of$6.12/APN
for the first 11,000 square feet plus $0.56 per 1,000 additional square feet of parcel area.
The use of parcel size provides for a more equitable distribution of the fee throughout the
various land uses within the County.
\ t) !
B~~ (}JJJ~Jt=-
Terry White! ) ~
Director of Ptlblic Works
Approved:
'-.
J-
Attachments: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING THAT THE
SAN MA TEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
IMPOSE BASIC AND ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR
FUNDING THE EXPANDED SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE
2006/07 COUNTYWIDE NA TIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the
1987 Federal Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local governments to
control and reduce the amount of stormwater pollutant runoff into receiving waters; and
WHEREAS, under the authority of California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act,
the State Water Resources Control Board had delegated authority to its regional boards to
inv()h~ nermitting reauirements unon counties and cities: and
--.----r-------~--o- .1-'--- -- -- -.I /
WHEREAS, in July 1991, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control
Board notified San Mateo County of the requirement to submit an NPDES Permit
Application by November 30, 1992; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the NPDES Permit Process, San Mateo County in
conjunction with all incorporated citiies in San Mateo County has prepared a Stormwater
Management Plan, which has a General Program as a fundamental component of the
Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan has been
submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and the
Management Plan has been approved by the Board and made part of the NPDES Waste
Discharge Permit CA 0029921, issued September 13, 1993 and remaining in effect
through June 30, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan and
NPDES Waste Discharge Permit CA 0029921 required that San Mateo County submit a
renewal application by March 31, 1998, which shall include a Stormwater Managem~:nt
Plan for 1998 through 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco has accepted, adopted and
committed to implement the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan for
1998-2003 and the renewal application and Plan was submitted to the San Francisco
Regional Water Quality Control Board on March 18, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, after
Public Hearing, approved the renewed NPDES Permit effective July 21, 1999 and which
expired July 20, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
opened the NPDES Permit CAS0029921 for the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Program to amend the permit to add new and redevelopment
language (Amendment of Order 99-059), and adopted the Amendment on February ] 9,
2003; and
WHEREAS, with the complete and timely application by the San Mateo
Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program for Permit renewal submitted on
January 23, 2004, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board will
administratively extend the expiration of said Permit until such time as a public hearing is
held and the application is considered; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Flood Control District Act, as amended by the
State Legislature in 1992 (Assembly Bill 2635), authorized the San Mateo County Flood
Control District to impose charges to fund storm drainage programs such as the NPDES
Program; and
WHEREAS, the Basic Annual Charges and Additional Annual Charges for fiscal
year 2006/07, when adopted, would be necessary to fund a $1,404,549 budget for fiscal
year 2006/07 are as follows:
Basic Annual Charges;
Single Family Residence: $3.44/APN
Miscellaneous, Agriculture, Vacant and Condominium: $1.72/APN
All Other Land Uses: $3.44/APN for the first 11,000 square feet plus
$0.32 per 1,000 square feet additional square feet of parcel area.
Additional Annual Charge (adjusted annually by C.P.!.);
Single Family Resident: $2.68/APN
Miscellaneous, Agriculture, Vacant and Condominium: $1.34/ APN
All Other Land Uses: $2.68/APN for the first 11,000 square feet plus
$0.24 per 1,000 additional square feet of parcel area.
WHEREAS, the charges are in the nature of a sewer service charge in that they
are intended to fund a federally mandated program the purpose of which is to create waste
treatment management planning processes to reduce the amount of pollutants in
discharges from property into municipal storm water systems which in turn, discharge
into the waters of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco has held a hearing upon the proposal
to fund the Countywide NPDES General Program through the San Mateo County Flood
Control District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco that:
1. The City of South San Francisco approves the amended Scope of Work
imposed on the NPDES General Program and respectfully requests the San
Mateo County Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing board of the San
Mateo County Flood Control District, to impose those basic and additional
charges necessary to fund the Countywide NPDES General Program; and
2. The City of South San Francisco requests that all properties within the
territorial limits of said City be charged the basic and additional annual
charges in accordance with said charges stated above; and
3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to forward copies of this Resolution to the
Clerk of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, the San Mateo County
Flood Control District, the San Mateo County Engineer, and to the NPDES
Coordinator of C/CAG.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-
~'t\\ s~
.g
o C'">
>-0 C;;
t:l c")
v 0
C' \.~
4lIFOp,.~
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #9
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RATE STRUCTURE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2006..2007
RECOMMENDATION
It is f'ecommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a resolution
establishing Storm water Management Program charges for the 2006-2007 Fiscal Year. It is
also recommended that Council :ildopt the Finance Director's Report of FY 2006-2007
Stormwater Management Service ]fees.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Introduction
The 2006-2007 Fiscal Year marks the fourteenth year of South San Francisco's participation in the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP) mandated by Federal and State Governments.
The current program fee structure was adopted by Council on July 19, 1995, and represents an
equitable distribution of costs taking into consideration the size and use of the parcel, and the
estimated amount of storm water runoff generated by the parcel. This fee calculation strategy is
similar to the process used by other storm water management programs, including the San Mateo
County General Program.
By direction ofthe City Council, stormwater program charges are to be adjusted so as not to exceed
actual program expenses. The proposed storm water program charges herein were developed in
response to Council's direction and are the same charges as the prior year.
Regulations
The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Clean Water Act, imposed
regulations that mandated local govemment to control and reduce stormwater pollution runoff. The
framework for regulating stormwatcr discharges is through a National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System Permit (NPDES). The permit is implemented and enforced by the State Water
Resources Control Board through its regional agency.
Staff Report
Subject: Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2006-2007
Page 2
South San Francisco, in cooperation with the other jurisdictions in San Mateo County jointly
reapplied for their Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit on March 18, 1998.
A requirement of the NPDES permit was the development of a five-year action plan, known as the
Storm water Management Plan. The Plan covers the period from July 1998 through June 2003 to
prevent and control stormwater pollution in San Mateo County. STOPPP's initial Stormwater
Management Plan covered the previous five-year period. The Storm water Management Plan
(SWMP) contains two-year work plans with budgets that describe in more detail how the General
Program's portion of the five-year SWMP will be completed. The two-year work plans and budgets
will be updated annually to include the subsequent fiscal year and submitted to the San Francisco
Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) each March.
The SWMP also contains detailed pt:rformance standards that identify what each of the member
agencies is committed to do to prevent stormwater pollutants from entering the storm drains and
conveyance systems that it owns and/or operates. STOPPP will review these performance standards
every two years and revise them as needed. New and modified performance standards will be
incorporated following the approval process described in the reissued NPDES permit.
Examples of General Program responsibilities include:
. Coordinate the overall program efforts'
. Submit consolidated quarterly, semi-annual, and annual reports to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board;
. Develop and sponsor training workshops;
. Develop educational/informational materials for dissemination within jurisdictions.
Examples of City Specific Program activities include:
· Street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, and other maintenance-related activities that may have an
impact on stormwater quality;
· Minimize or eliminate potential stormwater pollution sources at commercial and industrial
facilities through inspection and educational outreach activities, and to effectively prohibit illiCit
discharges (such as oil, paint, or soapy washwater) to the municipalities' storm drain systems;
. Educate the public about the differences between the sanitary sewer and storm drain systems and
the causes of stormwater pollution in order to encourage residents to adopt less polluting and
more environn1entally beneficial practices;
. Prohibit non-stormwater discharges from construction sites, reducing storm water pollutant
discharges from new development and construction activities to the maximum extent practicable,
and requiring compliance with stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) and
erosion/sedimentation control at construction sites;
Staff Report
Subject: Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2006-2007
Page 3
· Identifying effective BMP's and developing tools and analyzing information needed to identify
and help solve creek drainage basin-specific water quality and beneficial use impairment
problems.
South San Francisco Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Program Accomplishments
· Responded to 33 spill or illicit discharge complaints of materials (i.e. paint, oil, fuel, or concrete
materials) that could enter into the storm drains;
· Reviewed 153 building and construction plans and prepared written comments requesting
incorporation of storm water pollution prevention measures and post construction measures;
· SSF Staff participated with the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Program in staffing the booth
at the San Mateo County Fair which was held August 2005;
· On September 24,2005, the City of South San Francisco's Stormwater Program, along with the
Water Quality Control Plant participated in the City's Annual Day in the Park. A storm water
survey was completed by 47 attendees.
· On Saturday; September 17,2005, the City of South San Francisco's Beautification Committee
sponsored a Creek Clean-Up Event at a site behind Utah and Littlefield Aves. This was a two-
hour event with over 80 volunteers, including staff and community volunteers, picking up debris
and trash.
· The Office of Environmental Compliance continued its School Outreach Program to 4th grade
students by providing 40 presentations.
· The Office of Environmental Compliance presented Sewer Science to five high school classes at
El Ca..'11ino High School during the week of May 22, 2006. Sewer Science is a wastewater
treatment lab for high school students.
· The Office of Environmental Compliance conducted 50 erosion control inspections.
· The Office of Environmental Compliance conducted 211 stormwater inspections of food
facilities, auto repair facilities, and industrial facilities.
· The Office of Environmental Compliance compiled a list of homeowners groups and contacts for
future outreach.
FUNDING
The proposed program budget for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is $734,688. Funding will be: provided
from program service fees and carry-over funds from the previous fiscal year. A breakdown of the
program fees, according to classification type can be seen in Exhibit A. This assessment is collected
by the San Mateo County Assessor via property tax billings as in the previous year. The deadline to
place the stormwater program assessment on the tax rolls is August 5, 2006.
Staff Report
Subject Stormwater Management Program Rate Structure for Fiscal Year 2006-2007
Page 4
CONCLUSION
Storm water rates have not changed since their inception and as costs of the program increase this
trend cannot continue. More stringent regulation, adoption of vigorous enforcement actions by the
State, and normal operations are pushing costs ever higher. Staff is recommending adoption ofthe
current rate at this time, however, it is likely that if State laws do not change with respect to Prop 218
and stormwater mandates, Staff will need to bring to Council considerations to revise these program
costs in future years through an election process.
By~~j:GuJ~
Terry White l,
Director of Public Works
APproveUv L .(~
. Nagel
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution Approving Stormwater Management Service Charges
(Exhibit A to Resolution)
Resolution Adopting Report of Stormwater Management Services Fees for Fiscal
Year 2006-2007
Report of Stormwater Management Services Charges for 2006-2007.
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING STORMW A TER
MANAGEMENT SERVICE CHARGES FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2006-2007
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 14.04 enables the City to levy charges for
the local portion of the San Mateo County Storm water Management Program; and
WHEREAS, notices were published and a public hearing was held on June 14,
2006 as required for the enactment of the subject stormwater fees; and
WHEREAS, funding for the local program requires $734,688; and
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Service Charges are maintained at the level
established in Fiscal Year 1997-98.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco as follows:
1. The City Council hereby confirms the Stormwater Management Service
charge formula attached hereto as Exhibit A, for Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at
meeting held on the day of , 2006 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
833755-1
EXHIHIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO.
PROPOSED CHARGES FOR FY 2006-2007
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEES
PARCEL SIZE -;- BASE THRESHOLD x
(sq. footage) (average sq. ft. of single
family dwelliing)
EDU
RATE
(per class)
I number of EDU's)
Type of Parcels
Sample Fees per Classification:
1.
Single Family Residential
5,400 sq.ft. -;- 5,35:~ sq.ft. (base)
II EDU)
2.
Multi-Family Residential
10,700 sq.ft. -;- 5,352 sq.ft. (base)
I 2 EDU's)
Com mercial/Ind ustria I
(a) 20,000 sq.ft -;- 5,352 sq.ft. (base)
[ 3.73 EDU's)
3.
x $ 8.72
x $ 17.42
x $ 17.86
(b) 43,560 sq.ft. (I acre) -;- 5,352 sq.ft. (base) x $ 17.86
[8.13 EDU's]
4.
Vacant
10,000 sq.ft.
-. 5,352 sq.ft. (base)
[2 EDU's]
5.
Parking Lots
10,000 sq. ft.
-;- 5,352 sq. ft. (base)
x $ 1.74
x $ 26.14
ANNUAL
SERVICE
FEE
Annual Rate
$ 8.72
$ 34.84
$ 66.74
$ 145.36
$ 3.26
$ 48.84
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REPORT OF
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SERVICES FEES
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 PURSUANT TO SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
14.04. 11 0
WHEREAS, the City Council has given notice and on June 14, 2006, held a
public hearing as required by law on the subject stormwater rates; and
WHEREAS, the rates imposed and reflected in the Report of Stormwater
Management Services Fee for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 are the same as the unit rates
imposed in 2005-2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, by a mInImUm
two-thirds vote, hereby adopts the Report of Stormwater Management Services fee for
Fiscal Year 2006-2007, and directs that the rates so established shall be collected on the
official tax assessment roll, together with real property taxes, and that the amount shall
constitute liens upon the properties which shall be effective at the same time and to the
same extent as is provided for by law in the case of real property taxes, with like penalties
for delinquencies.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a
meeting held on the _ day of , 2006 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
833759-1
REPORT OF
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SERVICES CHARGES FOR 2006-2007
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 14.04 OF THE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
In accordance with Chapter 14.04 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, the following report
prepared as of May 26, 2006 is submitted. This report describes the procedure for charging those
parcels of real property, which receive benefits of stormwater system services, and the amount of the
annual charge, which will be imposed against each parcel for fiscal year 2006-2007.
Summary of Charges
All single-family residential properties
$123,481.02
All multi-family residential properties
(Including duplexes)
$ 56,926.08
All commercial/industrial
$212,873.46
Parking lots
$ 11,328.86
Vacant
$ 6,792.16
TnT ^ T
.1 '\.J .1 1 l.-L..i
.rh AI 1"'1 "r. 11 ,- n
:b4.1,4VL)(s
This report refers to and incorporates by reference the report entitled "Notice of Proposed City of
South San Francisco Stom1water Management Program Rate Structure" for fiscal year 2006-2007
prepared by and on file in the Office of the Technical Services Supervisor. That report summarizes
the 2006-2007 charges that will be proposed by the City Council on June 14,2006. Upon adoption
of the proposed charges, or amendments thereto, a report entitled "City of South San Francisco
Stormwater System Charges," prepared by Engineering Data Services, Los Altos, California will be
completed; it 'vvill describe the amount of annual charge imposed against each parcel, by Assessor's
Parcel Number, for Fiscal Year 2006-2007. All of these documents, including this report, shall be
filed with the County Tax Collector or Auditor. Accompanying the filing of this report shall be the
Clerk's endorsement that the report has been duly adopted by the City Council.
Dated:
te~c1~
1. teele
Hector of Finance
CLERK'S STATEMENT
I, Sylvia M. Payne, City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation,
do hereby certify that the foregoing report was adopted by the City Council on the __ day of
_, 2006 by Resolution No. _'
Dated:
Sylvia M. Payne
City Clerk
~'t\\ s~
1~1i~
E;:l C")
v 0
~4l~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #10
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 14, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Terry White, Director of Public Works
PROPOSED SEWER RATE INCREASE AND "REPORT OF ANNUAL
SEWER RENTALS AND CHARGES" FOR FY 2006-2007.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution
establishing sewer service rates for FY 2006-2007, amending the master fee schedule to include
the rates, and adopting the "Report of Annual Sewer Rental and Charges" for FY 2006-2007.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
In June 2004, in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218, the City notified by mail the
owners of property in South San Francisco of proposed rate increases of up to 9 % each year for FY
2006 through FY 2009. It was explained in the notice that the rate increases were needed to finance
capital improvements for the City's Wah;~r Quality Control Plant (WQCP) and sanitary sewer system.
A presentation of the improvements and financial requirements was given to the public at the
Magnolia Recreation Center in July 2004. The improvements allow the City to comply with state
and federal clean water requirements intended to protect the San Francisco Bay and public health.
On July 14,2004, at its public hearing, the City Council approved a resolution containing a five-year
schedule of charges which called for increases up to 9% for FY 2005-06, FY 2006-07, FY 2007-08,
and for FY 2008-09. The revenue generated by the sewer service charges fund the following cost
categories:
>- Treatment Plant Operating Costs
>- Sewer Maintenance Costs
>- Sewage Pump Stations Costs
>- Industrial Waste Control Costs
>- Debt Service Costs associated with the capital improvements
The improvements at the WQCP now allow the plant to reliably treat up to 13 million gallons of
wastewater per day as needed to meet state requirements contained in the City's NPDES Permit.
Staff Report
Subject: Proposed Sewer Rate Increase
Page 2
In addition to the improvements at the treatment plant, several Wet Weather projects have been
completed or are nearing completion of design for construction:
y An effluent storage basin to prevent wastewater overflows to Colma Creek
y Major pump station improvements to prevent sanitary sewage overflows
y Two major force mains to convey wet-weather flows to the treatment plant
y General sanitary sewer rehabilitation to reduce storm water inflow and infiltration
These projects are needed to comply with the requirements of the State Regional Water Quality
Control Board in its Cease and Desist Order issued to the City in 1997 and are needed to prevent raw
sewage overflows from sanitary sewers that have occurred during severe rain storms in the
past. Such overflows are a violation of the City's NPDES Permit and pose a threat to
environmental and public health.
CONCLUSION
Bartle Wells Associates, an independent financial advisory firm, updated the financial forecast for the
City. Based on this evaluation, which includes estimates of Sewer Fund revenues and expenses,
staff recommends that the maximum 9% rate increase be adopted for FY 2006-07.
The proposed sewer service rates were determined in accordance with State guidelines. Staff
believes the rates are fair and equitable allocation of costs to the various classes of users and are in
proportion to the amount of sewage discharged into the sewer system. The current annual rate for a
residence is $296. The proposed rate is $323, which amounts to a $2.25 per month increase.
A comparison of the residential rates for other cities in San Mateo County is attached.
A notice of water usage and estimated sewer service charges was sent on May 1, 2006, to all
commercial property owners in the South San Francisco service area for a 30-day protest period as
required by the Municipal Code. The City Clerk has had a notice of the proposed rates published
in a local newspaper as required by the Municipal Code.
"-
~
By;""-J { "'. -
Terry ~
Director otFilblic Works
Approved
Attachment: Resolution establishing Sewer Service Rates for FY 2006-2007
and adopting "Report of Annual Sewer Rentals and Charges for FY 2006-2007."
Exhibit "A" to Resolution, Sewer Rates for Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
Survey of Residential Sewer Service Charges in San Mateo County.
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A INCREASE FOR
SEWER RATES EFFECTIVE FISCAL YEAR 2006-
2007, AMENDINGTHE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO
INCLUDE THE RATES, AND ADOPTING A REPORT
OF ANNUAL SEWER RENTALS OR CHARGES FOR
2006-2007 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14.12 OF THE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, by Chapter 14.12 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code the City
Council is authorized to establish sewer rates by resolution; and
WHEREAS, in March 2004, the City Council reviewed the implementation of the 5-
year rate increases of 25% for 2004-2005, and up to 9% annually through 2008-2009 to
finance improvements to the City's sewer collection, pumping and treatment facilities; and
WHEREAS, in May and June of 2006, in accordance with the requirements of
Proposition 218, the City notified the owners of property within South San Francisco ofthe
proposed rate increases, and notice of the proposed increase and the public hearing was
published in the San Mateo Times; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given notice and on June 14, 2006, held a pubhc
hearing as required by law on the subject sewer rates; and
WHEREAS, the rates reflected in the report of Annual Sewer Rentals and charges are
consistent with the five-year financing plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South
San Francisco that it hereby approve the schedule of rates set forth in the attached Exhibit
"A" which implements the previously approved financing plan, and hereby amends the City's
Master Fee Schedule to include the rates.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Report of
Annual Sewer Rentals and Charges for Fiscal Year 2006-2007, and directs that the rates so
established shall be collected on the official tax assessment roll, together with real property
taxes, and that the amount shall constitute liens upon the properties which shall be effective
at the same time and to the same extent as is provided for by law in the case of real property
taxes, with like penalties for delinquencies.
*
*
*
*
*
833760-1
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted
by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REPORT OF SEWER RENTAL CHARGES FOR 2006-2007
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 14.12 OF THE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
In accordance with Chapter 14.12 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, the following report
prepared as of May 26, 2006 is submitted. The report describes the procedure of charging those
parcels of real property, which directly receive the benefits of municipal sanitary sewer services and
the amount of the annual charge or rental, which will be imposed against each parcel for Fiscal Year
2006-2007.
I. Summary of Rentals or Charges. The following is a summary of the annual rental or charges
for 2006-2007.
All commercial and industrial properties
All residential properties, except those serviced
by Westborough County Water District
Billed by Statement
$ 6,446,000
$ 5,594,000
$ 268,000
Total $12,308,000
2. Sewer Rental Account File. This report refers to and incorporates by reference the report
entitled "Rate Determination and Revenue Program Summary," prepared by and on file at the
City of South San Francisco Water Quality Control Plant. The report summarizes the 2006-
2007 sewer rental charge that will be proposed to the City Council on June 14, 2006. Upon
adoption of the proposed charges, or amendments thereto, a report entitled "City of South
San Francisco Sanitary Sewer Charges", prepared by Engineering Data Services, Los Altos,
California, will be completed. The report will describe by Assessor's Parcel Number each
parcel of real property receiving directly the benefits of municipal sanitary sewer service and
the amount of annual charge or rental imposed against each parcel for fiscal year 2006-2007.
All ofthese documents, including this report shall be filed with the County Tax Collector or
Auditor. Accompanying the filing of this report shall be the Clerk's endorsement that the
report has been adopted by the City Council.
Dated: May 26, 2006
~
Dirdhtor of Finance
CLERK'S STATEMENT
I, Sylvia M. Payne, City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation,
do hereby certify that the foregoing report was adopted by the City Council on the
day of
_, 2006 by Resolution No. _'
Dated:
Sylvia M. Payne
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO.
SEWER RATES FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
PARCELS BY USE CLASSIFICATION
ANNUAL RATE
A. Residential Class
Single-family dwelling
$323.00 per dwelling
per year
Multi-family dwelling (duplexes,
flats, apartments, and similar
class of users)
$323 per dwelling
per unit per year
Trailer Court and similar class of
uses
$290.00 per dwelling
per unit per year
B. Institutional Class
Schools, colleges, rest homes~1
hospitals, clubs, lodges, and
similar class of uses.
Minimum charge, or
$323.00 per year
Volume charge based on water
consumed (metered inflow) , or
$ 3.454 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
Volume charge based on water
consumed (metered effluent)
$ 3.838 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
C. Commercial and NonmonitoJred
Industrial Classes
1. Light Strength Uses:
Bars (without dining
facilities), car washes,
department and retaill stores,
hotels, motels (without dining
facilities), laundromalts,
professional and busi][)ess
offices, banks, savings and
loan associations, warehouses,
auto rentals (without repair
shops), newspapers, commercial
printing shops, freight and
drayage services, barber shops,
shoe repair shops, camera
shops, plating shops, wood and
furniture fabricators, heating
and appliance stores, drug
stores, auto supply stores,
general contractors' offices,
public administration offices,
health services, legal
services, dry cleaners., metal
fabricators, lumber companies,
laundry services, shet~t metal
shops, and similar classes of
uses with wastewater strengths
less than or approximated
equivalent to residential
strength
Minimum charge, or
$323.00 per facility
per year
V olume charge based on water
consumed (metered inflow), or
$ 4.281 per 100 cubic
feet of water consumed
V olume charge based on water
consumed (metered effluent)
$ 4.757 per 100 cubic
feet of water consumed
2. Moderate Strength Uses:
Auto/gas service stations,
auto steam cleaners, 3lUto
rentals (with repair shops),
bakeries, beauty and hair
salons, commercial laundries,
mortuaries, lodges (with
dining facilities), radiator
repair shops, markets (with
garbage disposals), iCle cream
parlors, candy manufacturers,
food preparation and caterers,
sandwich shops, driv(~-in
theaters, creameries, Iroofers,
chemical preparations, machine
shops, photo/film prol[:essors,
rug, carpet, upholstery
cleaners, foundries, cc~ramics
studios, oil services,
transmission services,.
sanitation services,
furriers, drum and
barrel cleaners, and similar
classes of uses with
wastewater strengths
significantly greater than
residential strength.
The user will be reclassified
to the light strength use
classification if it adequately
demonstrates to the city
engineer it is dischar~~ing only
segregated or wastewater
equivalent in strength to
residential wastewater.
Minimum charge, or
$323.00 per year
Volume charge based on water
$ 6.701 per 100
consumed (metered inflow), or
cubic feet of water
consumed
Volume charge based on water
consumed (metered effluent)
$ 7.445 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
3. Restaurants, Cafes and Other
Eating Places:
Minimum charge, or
$323.00 per year
Volume charge, based on water
consumed (metered inflow), or
$ 9.789 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
V olume charge, basedl on water
consumed (metered effluent)
$ 10.877 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
Monitored and Industrial Class:
1. Monitored and Industrial
Users:
Manufacturers, procf:ssors,
producers, laundries, photo
finishers, painting services,
packagers and similar classes
of uses whose wastewater are
monitored by the City
Minimum charge, or combination
of the following:
$323.00 per year
Volume charge, based on water
consumed (metered inflow), or
$ 2.565 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
V olume charge, based on water
consumed (metered effluent)
$ 2.850 per 100
cubic feet of water
consumed
Surcharge for suspended solids
(SS)
$ 0.861 per pound of
suspended solids
discharged
Surcharge for chemical oxygen
demand (COD)
$ 0.266 per pound of
COD discharged
2. Septage Waste Haulers:
Commercial businessc;:s which
haul to and dispose of septage
waste at the Water Quality
Control Plant.
Minimum charge
$323.00 per year
Volume charge based on waste
water discharge
$ 0.183 per gallon
discharged
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
SAN MATEO COUNTY
(as of MA Y 26, 2006)
AGENCY
ANNUAL SEWER CHARGE
HILLSBOROUGH $1 ,315 *
PACIFICA $ 623
MONTARA SANITARY DIST. $ 553
BRISBANE $ 535
MILLBRAE $ 448
FOSTER CITY $ 421*
HALF MOON BAY $ 419
SAN BRUNO $ 410
DAL Y CITY $ 406
BURLINGAME $ 395
BELMONT $ 364*
SAN MATEO $ 352
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (with proposed 9% increase) $ 323*
REDWOOD CITY $ 315*
EL GRANADA SANITARY $ 314*
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Current) $ 296*
MENLO PARK $ 290*
SAN CARLOS $ 276*
AVG. $ 423
* Flat Charge per year not tied to individual water consumption
Other listed rates are annual estimates based on a homeowners "average" monthly domestic
water consumption charges that can vary year to year, household to household.
AGENDA ITEM #11
11. Consideration of use permit (UP-05-001O) and design review (DR-05-0020) to
allow construction of a Home Depot store, garden center and parking structure at
900 Dubuque Avenue; Applicant: Home Depot; Owner: Levitz SL San
Francisco -
Request to continue item to June 28, 2006
Staff Re120rt
AGENDA ITEM #12
DATE:
June 14,2006
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT:
1. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ALLOWING THIRTEEN (13)
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND COMMON AREA.
2. DENSITY BONUS OF NINE PERCENT (9%) ALLOWING AN
ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SSFMC
CHAPTER 20.130.
3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
APPLICANT AND THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
RESTRICTING THREE (3) OF THE DWELLINGS AS
AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS IN ACCORDANCE vVITH
SSFMC 20.125.
4. DESIGN REVIEW ALLOWING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
THREE-STORY THIRTEEN (13) UNIT RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIlTh-1 BUILDING WITH THIRTY (30) P ARKlNG
SPACES AND LANDSCAPING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SSFMC
CHAPTER 20.85.
90 Oak Avenue (APNs 011-313-070,080 & 090)
Patrick Doherty
P06-0016 (SA06-0001, DB06-0001, AHA06-
0001, DR06-0015 & MND 01-054)
Mitigated Negative Declaration assessing environmental impacts of a
new fifteen (15) unit apartment building, previously approved by the
City Council on May 26, 2002.
Address:
Owner & Applic:ant:
Case Nos.:
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council follow the Planning Commission recommendation and adopt the attached
resolution approving 1) Tentative Subdivision Map allowing thirteen (13) residential
condominiums and common area; 2) Density Bonus of nine percent (9%) allowing an additional
dwelling unit; 3) Affordable Housing A:greement requiring three (3) dwelling units to be restricted
as affordable dwellings; and 4) Design Review allowing for the construction of a three-story
thirteen (13) unit residential condominium building with thirty parking spaces and landscaping,
including the required findings and the conditions of approval.
Staff Report
Subject: 90 Oak Residential Condominiums
Page 2 01'3
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The City Council reviewed the proposed development on May 24, 2006 and offered several comments
regarding the proposed landscape plan and formal presentation. The Council members asked that the
applicant provide additional landscape information, including tree sizes, and provide a power point
presentation.
The applicant has incorporated the comments into the plans and will make a power point presentation at
the Council meeting. (The May 24,2006 Staff Report is attached for your reference.)
As originally approved by the City Council, the project included demolition of the existing dwelling and
the construction of a three-story fifteen (15) unit apartment building. Three (3) of the dwellings were
required to be restricted as affordable units. Parking was provided in an at-grade and in a small
subterranean garage. The site is adjacent to other dwellings and a religious assembly hall.
The project also necessitated a rezoning from Medium Density Residential (R-2) to the Multi-Family
Residential (R-3) Zoning district to bring it into compliance with the adopted General Plan Land use
designation of High Density Residential. A Density Bonus was also approved allowing three (3)
additional dwellings.
Proposed 2006 Development
The proposed development is essentially the same design as the approved plans. Key changes include
the addition of a small meeting room, the reduction from fifteen (15) dwellings to thirteen (13)
dwellings and elimination of a small underground garage that served to provide a portion of the required
parking spaces associated with the fifteen (15) unit development. The footprint of the building is
essentially unchanged. The reduction in dwelling units and the elimination of the garage was
necessitated by the placement of the trunk sewer line in the middle of the property. A small meeting
room has been provided as an amenity for the future homeowner's association.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The proposed development was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meetings of April 20, and
May 4, 2006. At the April 20th meeting the Commissioners recommended ap~roval of the development,
but directed that the applicant return to the Commission meeting of May 4t to allow the review of a
colored rendering of the building and the exterior materials and color board. At the May 4th meeting, the
Commissioners recommended approval of the proposed exterior materials and colors.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIO~~:
The subdivision of the site and the construction of a building containing thirteen (13) residential
condominiums are consistent with the City's General Plan, with the Zoning and Subdivision Codes and
all other applicable requirements of the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, City staff recommends that
the City Council follow the Planning Commission recommendation and adopt the attached resolution
Staff Report
Subject: 90 Oak Residential Condominiums
Page 3 of3
approving 1) Tentative Subdivision Map allowing thirteen (13) residential condominiums and common
area; 2) Density Bonus of nine percent (9%) allowing an additional dwelling unit; 3) Affordable
Housing Agreement requiring three (3) dwelling units to be restricted as affordable dweJ.lings; and 4)
Design Review allowing for the construction of a three-story thirteen (13) unit residential condominium
building with thirty (30) parking spaces, including the required findings and the conditions of approval.
By:
~
By:
Marty VanDuyn
Assistant City Manag r
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft City Council Resolution
May 24, 2006 City Council Staff Report without attachments
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2006 (Draft)
Plans
Previously Approved 15 Apartments
Proposed Condominiums
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, A DENSITY BONUS,
AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT AND A DESIGN REVIEW ON A 0.41
ACRE SITE SITUATED AT 90 OAK AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearings on April 20, 2006 and May 4, 2006; and
WHEREAS, as required by the "Amendment Procedures" (SSFMC Chapter 20.87), and
Title 19 (Subdivision Ordinance), th(~ City Council, based on public testimony and the materials
submitted to the City of South San lFrancisco Planning Commission which include, but are not
limited to: an Affordable Housing Agreement prepared by the City of South San Francisco;
Architectural and Landscape Plans, dated July 20, 2005, prepared by Anthony M. Brandi,
Architect; Civil Drawings prepared by Brian Kangas Foulk dated February 3, 2006; Mitigated
Negative Declaration 01-054 previously adopted by the City Council on May 26, 2002; minutes
of the Design Review Board meeting of March 21,2006; Planning Commission staff reports; the
April 20, 2006 and May 4, 2006, Plmming Commission meetings; City Council staff reports; and
the City Council meetings of May 24 and June 14, 2006, makes the following findings in support
of Tentative Subdivision Map, Density Bonus, and Affordable Housing Agreement with
provisions for Affordable Housing allowing a thirteen (13) unit residential condominium
building on a 0.41 acre site located at 90 Oak Avenue, owned by Patrick Doherty:
1. The project is consistent with the provisions of the City's General Plan that
support residential development, and specifically with the Housing Element regarding
the development of additional market rate and affordable housing in the community to
meet on-going demand. The proposed density of 31. 8 units per acre for the 0.41 acres to
be developed with dwellings is well within the overall density of 37.5 units per acre for
the High Density Residential category provided in the City's General Plan with the
density increase permitted by the General Plan.
2. The 0.41 acre site is physically suited for the proposed single-family subdivision.
3. The development will create a residential environment of sustained desirability
and stability and will result in an intensity of land use similar to adjacent multi-family
and single-family neighborhoods. The proposed density of 31.8 units per acre and the
general style and quality of the new residences and site improvements is substantially
similar to recently approved subdivisions in the City.
5. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been previously approved by the City
Council on May 26, 2005 for the project in accordance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Mitigated Negative Declaration 01-54,
adopted by the City Council on May 26, 2002, identifies several potential adverse
impacts attributable to the development of the thirteen (13) new residences. The impacts
can be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of mitigation
measures. A Mitigation Monitoring Program is established to ensure that impacts are
reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation measures, including a mitigation
monitoring program, have been incorporated into the project or have been made
conditions of approval which will reduce identified impacts to a less than significant
level.
6. The Tentative Subdivision Map allowing thirteen (13) residential condominiums
and common area, will not be adverse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of
the community, nor unreasonably detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements.
The use is compatible with the existing uses. Site improvements including the provision
of upgrades to the public infrastructure, and landscaping the yards, will reduce potential
adverse impacts to the public infrastructure, reduce circulation conflicts and provide a
streetscape that is comparable to the surrounding neighborhoods.
7. The thirteen (13) new residential condominiums, thirty (30) on-site parking
spaces and site landscaping comply with the City's Design Guidelines.
8. The residences comply with the applicable community design guidelines
established in the South San Francisco Municipal Code Sections 20.68 through 20.74.
The design and improvements are not in conflict with any known existing public
easements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the South San Francisco City Council
hereby approves Tentative Subdivision Map 06-0001, Density Bonus 06-0001, the Affordable
Housing Agreement 06-0001 and Design Review 06-0015 subject to the Conditions of Approval
contained in Exhibit B.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and adoption.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City
of South San Francisco at the regular meeting held on the day of
2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
Attest:
City Clerk
PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
90 OAK AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS
SA06-0001, DR 106-0015, DB06-0001 & AHA06-0001
(As recommended by the Planning Commission on April 20, 2006)
A. PLANNING DIVISION:
1. The applicant shall comply with the City's Standard Conditions and with all the
requirements of all affeeted City Divisions and Departments as contained in the
attached conditions, except as amended by the conditions of approval.
2. The construction drawings shall substantially comply with the Planning
Commission approved plans, as amended by the conditions of approval including
the plans prepared Anthony M. Brandi Architect, dated July 20, 2005, and Civil
Plans, prepared by Brian Kangas Foulk, dated February 3, 2006 in association
with P06-00 16.
3. The landscape plan shall be revised to include mature shrubs and trees. Trees shall
have a minimum size of 24 inch box with a trunk diameter ranging from 1.5
inches to 2.5 inches and 15% of the total number of proposed trees shall be a
minimum size 01'36 inch box with trunk diameters ranging in excess 01'2.5
inches. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the
City's Chief Planner.
4. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the Final Subdivision Map including
the CC&R's shall be reeorded with the San Mateo County Recorder's Office. The
applicant shall provide a record with the City Engineer.
5. The owner shall pay the: Childcare Impact Fee estimated to be $ 21,112.00 [13
Dwellings x $ 1,624.00/Dwelling = $ 21,112.00 (SSFMC Chapter 20.115)].
6. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit the owner shall meet with the City's
Park and Recreation Director and develop a Parks and Recreation Fee Plan in-lieu
of parkland dedication in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 19.24. Prior to the
Final Inspection the owner shall pay the Parks and Recreation Fees in-lieu of park
land dedication [SSFMC Chapter 19.24]. The plan shall be subject to the review
and approval of the City's Park and Recreation Director.
7. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures associated with Mitigated
Negative Declaration 01-054 and shall implement a mitigation monitoring
program. The mitigation monitoring program shall be subject to the review and
approval ofthe City's Chief Planner.
8. Prior to completion ofthe building or sale of the property, the applicant shall
complete the Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA). The Final AHA shall be
subject to the review and approval of the City's Housing Manager and City Attorney.
(Planning Contact: Steve Carlson, Senior Planner, 650/877-8353, Fax 650/829-6639)
B. ENGINEERING DIVISION:
1. The developer shall comply with all of the applicable conditions of approval
detailed in the Engineering Division's "Standard Subdivision and Use Permit
Conditions for Townhouse, Condominium and Apartment Developments with
Private Streets and Utilities", contained in our "Standard Conditions for
Subdivisions and Private Developments" booklet dated January 1998. This
booklet is available in our office at no cost to the applicant.
2. The developer shall design, construct and install: new curb, gutter, sidewalk,
driveway approach and pavement overlay/conform to the street centerline (if
necessary) within Oak Avenue, in front of the subject property. Plans for these
improvements shall be prepared by the developer's civil engineering consultant
and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The frontage
improvement work shall be constructed at no cost to the City and in accordance
with the approved plans, to the satisfaction of the City's Engineering Construction
Coordinator and pursuant to the terms of a secured encroachment permit, to be
obtained prior to receiving a building permit for the project.
3. The developer shall design a storm drainage system for the project that will drain
the entire site, without Howing onto adjacent private property. The on-site
drainage system shall connect directly to the existing public drainage facilities
located within Oak A ve:nue. The drainage system shall incorporate storm water
filters, meeting the requirements of the San Mateo County Best Management
Practices for private developments. The plans for these improvements shall be
prepared by the developer's civil engineering consultant and submitted to the
Engineering and Water Quality Control Divisions for review and approval.
4. The applicant is advised that the subject site is located within FEMA Flood
Hazard Zone AH and will need to have the elevation of its floor raised above the
100-year flood elevation. The proposed underground garage may need special
flood-proofing and drainage improvements to conform to FEMA's regulations.
5. The developers shall show on their plans all utility connections proposed to
service the building. The plans shall show all existing utilities that may be
affected by the new senrices. All utility facilities and appurtenances shall be
installed underground.
6. The applicant shall submit the following plans for review: Site, Grading &
Drainage, Landscaping and Utility Plans, in accordance with the Engineering
7. Division's "Typical PI,m Check Submittals" requirements hand-out sheet.
8. There is an existing City 10" diameter sanitary sewer main, which crosses the
subject property and must be relocated before the proposed apartment can be
constructed. The applicant shall design, construct and install a new I 0" sewer
main, which will by-pass the subject property. The applicant has submitted a
proposed Sewer Relocation plan, dated February 20,2002, prepared by BKF Civil
Engineers, showing a new sewer main installed within Oak A venue and
Commercial A venue. The main would connect with an existing manhole in front
of90 Oak Avenue, flow North to Commercial Avenue, then East along
Commercial, connecting to the existing sewer main at Commercial Avenue's
intersection with Daly Court. This plan is acceptable, under the following
conditions:
a) The sewer shall ble installed along the alignment of the existing sewer within
Commercial Avenue. The existing old sewer shall be removed and replaced
with the new 10" sewer main and any existing laterals reconnected to the
new line.
b) Because of the existing number of utility cuts in the street and the impact of
the new sewer installation, the applicant shall also over-lay the portion of
Commercial Avenue, between Oak A venue and the East side of Daly Court
with 1.5 inches of Class A asphaltic concrete.
c) The applicants shall have their civil engineer prepare plans and
specifications to perform this work. The plans and specifications shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The applicant shall
install the new sewer main, in accordance with the approved plans and to
City standards.
d) Prior to receiving a building permit for the apartment, the applicant shall
obtain an encroachment permit or public improvement agreement, secured
by cash, a letter of credit, or surety bond in the amount of the Engineer's
Estimate to perform the work, as approved by the City Engineer.
Alternately, the applicant may install a new 12" sewer main extending down Oak
Avenue to the 18" City trunk main within Mission Road. However, this
alternative will have to be evaluated by the applicant's civil engineer to verify, to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that the portion of the 18" main, between
Oak Avenue and Chestnut Avenue (where the main size increases to 24"
diameter) can accommodate the additional sewage flow, along with the existing
flow in the line, as well as the future flows from Daly City, the Town of Colma
and from future development in South San Francisco within the drainage basin
that discharges into the Mission Road main. Conditions 7c and 7d discussed
above would apply to this solution to the sewer relocation requirement.
(Engineering Contact: Michelle Bocalan, 650/829-6652)
C. POLICE DEPARTMENT:
A. Municipal Code Compliance
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.48 of the Municipal
Code, "Minimum Building Security Standards" Ordinance revised May 1995. The
Police Department res<::rves the right to make additional security and safety
conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed/revised building plans.
B. Doors
Exterior Doors
1. Exterior doors and doors leading from garage areas into single-family dwellings
shall be of solid core with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths inch.
2. Exterior doors for single-family dwellings and garages shall have deadbolt locks
with a one-inch minimum throw in addition to deadlatches. The locks shall be so
constructed that both deadbolt and deadlatch can be retracted by a single action of
the inside doorknob. Allternate devices equally resistant to illegal entry may be
substituted subject to prior approval of the police department. Strike plates shall
be secured to wooden jambs with at least two and one-half inch wood screws.
(Refer to subsection (a) (1) (H) of this section.)
3. Doors leading from enclosed garage areas into single-family dwellings shall have
deadbolts in addition to deadlatches and shall meet the single action requirements
of subsection (a)(l)(B) of this section.
4. Vision panels in exterior doors or within reach of the inside activating device
must be of burglary resistant glazing or equivalent as approved by the police
department.
5. Openings for delivery of mail will be allowed and those openings shall be no
larger than twenty-four square inches. Openings located within three feet of any
locking device shall be constructed to prohibit access to the interior doorknob.
6. Exterior doors swinging out shall have non-removable hinge pins or hinges with
studs.
7. Exterior doors swinging in shall have rabbeted jambs.
8. Door frames shall be installed or protected to prevent violation of the function of
the strike.
a. Door jambs shall be installed with solid backing in such a manner that no
voids exist between the strike side of the jamb and the frame openi.ng for a
vertical distance of six inches each side of the strike.
b. In wood framing, horizontal blocking shall be placed between studs at
door lock height for three stud spaces each side of the door openings.
Trimmers shall be full length from the header to the floor with solid
backing against sole plates.
c. The strike plate for deadbolts on all wood-framed doors shall be
constructed of minimum sixteen U. S. gauge steel, bronze or brass and
secured to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, which must penetrate at
least two and one-half inches into solid backing beyond the surface to
which the strike is attached.
9. On pairs of doors, the active leaf shall be secured with the type lock required for
single doors in subsection (a) (1) (B) ofthis section. The inactive leaf shall be
equipped with lever flush extension bolts or equivalent, protected by hardened
material with a throw of three-fourths inch at head and foot. Multiple point locks,
cylinder-activated from the active leaf and satisfying the requirements above may
be used in lieu of flushbolts.
10. An interviewer or peephole shall be provided in each main entry door and shall
allow for one hundred eighty degree vision.
Sliding Patio Doors
Sliding patio type doors opening onto patios or balconies which are otherwise
accessible from the outside (this includes accessibility from adjacent balconies)
shall comply with the following:
1. Single sliding patio doors shall be adjusted in such a manner that the vertical play
is taken up to prevent lifting with a pry tool to defeat the locking mechanism.
2. Deadlocks shall be provided on all single sliding patio doors. Mounting screws
for the lock cases shall be inaccessible from the outside. Lock or hook bolts shall
be hardened steel or have hardened steel inserts and shall be capable of
withstanding a force of eight hundred pounds applied in any horizontal direction.
The lock or hook bolt shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its being
disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space or clearances
necessary for installation and operation. The strike area shall be reinforced to
maintain effectiveness of bolt strength.
3. In addition to the primary locking device, auxiliary or secondary locking devices
shall be provided on all accessible sliding-glass doors.
4. Double sliding patio doors shall be locked at the meeting rail and meet the locking
requirements of subsection (a) (2) (B) of this section.
C. Windows
1. A window, skylight or other natural light source forming a part of the enc:1osure of
a dwelling unit shall be: constructed, installed, and secured as set forth in
subsection (b) (2) ofth:ls section when such window, skylight or light source is
not more than twelve feet above the ground of a street, roadway, yard, court,
passageway, corridor, balcony, patio, breezeway or any portion of the building
which is available for use by the public or otherwise tenants, or similar area. A
window enclosing a private garage, with an interior opening leading directly to a
dwelling unit, shall also comply with subsection (b) (2) ofthis section.
2. Window Protection.
a. Windows shall be constructed so that when the window is locked it cannot
be lifted from the frame, and the sliding portion of a window shall be on
the inside track. The vertical play shall be taken up to prevent lifting of the
movable section to defeat the locking mechanism.
b. Window locking devices shall be capable of withstanding a force of two
hundred pounds applied in any direction.
c. Louvered glass windows shall not be used.
d. Accessible windows that open should be equipped with secondary locking
devices.
D. Garages: Overhead garage doors shall be provided with a locking device or
automatic door opener ,md shall not have bottom vents except those doors having
double louvered or shielded vents or approved alternate devices to protect the
locking mechanism.
Garages shall be used to storage vehicles and limited automotive supplies only.
Garages shall not be used for human inhabitation at any time.
E. Keying Requirements: Upon occupancy by the owner each single unit in a tract
constructed under the same general plan shall have locks using combinations,
which are interchange firee from locks used in all other separate dwellings..
F. Numbering: All residential dwellings shall display a street number in a prominent
location on the street side of the residence in such a position that the number is
easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numerals shall be no less
than three inches in height and shall be of a contrasting color to the background to
which they are attached.. The numerals shall be lighted at night.
G. Landscaping: All shrubbery shall be trimmed down to no greater than 36 inches,
so as not to obscure natural surveillance. All trees adjacent to the home shall be
trimmed up to no less than seven feet, so as not to provide a natural ladder for
unauthorized roof access.
H. Emergency Vehicle Access: Emergency vehicles must be able to access all areas
of the complex, either for medical or police emergencies. Low curbs and or
camouflaged driveways using Turf-Block may be used.
(Police Department contact: Sergeant Alan Normandy 650/877-8927)
D. BUILDING DIVISION
1. Building exits at ground level are not sufficient in width, building set to dose to
property line with landscape strip.
2. Building handicapped emtrances to the units are not wide enough to provide
minimum required dimensions.
3. Doors at grade level encroach into exit paths.
4. Additional comments at plan review.
(Building Division contact: Jim Kirkman 650/829-6670)
E. WATER QUALITY DIVISION:
I. A plan showing the location of all storm drains and sanitary sewers must be
submitted.
2. The onsite catch basins are to be stenciled with the approved San Mateo
Countywide Stormwate:r Logo.
3. Storm water pollution preventions devices are to be installed. A combination of
landscape based controls (e.g., vegetated swales, bioretention areas, planter/tree
boxes, and ponds) and manufactured controls (vault based separators, vault based
media filters, and other removal devices) are preferred. Existing catch basins are
to be retrofitted with catch basin inserts or equivalent. These devices must be
shown on the plans prior to the issuance of a permit. CDS or Stormceptor units
alone are not acceptable; they must be part of a treatment train. One of the
following must be used in series with each CDS or Stormceptor unit: swales,
detention basins, media (sand) filters, bioretention areas, or vegetated buffer
strips.
4. The applicant must submit a signed maintenance schedule for the stormwater
pollution prevention devices installed.
5. Applicant must comph:te the Project Applicant Checklist prior to issuance of a
permit and return to the Environmental Compliance Coordinator at the \VQCP.
6. Plans must include location of concrete wash out area and location of
entrance/outlet of tire wash.
7. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be submitted.
8. An Erosion and Sediml;:nt Control Plan must be submitted.
9. Trash handling area must be covered, enclosed and must drain to sanitary sewer.
This must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a permit.
10. Fire sprinkler system test/drainage valve should be plumbed into the sanitary
sewer system. This must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a pennit.
11. Applicant must pay a sewer connection fee per unit when the permit is issued.
The 2006 connection ft~e is $1,596.00 per unit.
(Water Quality contact: Cas5iie Prudhel 650/877-8634)
-=
=:::::::
'.
"-
-
..
--
~
. -'. ~
-
-
I :!I
.J
.:~~ --..
.'
...
/'~":~:~"
~
FRONT~VIEW PERSPECTIVE
]
.
T
~Inn
APPROVAL.
CASE # ~ \)~ i1~-D\~
, ,
DATE' ~ ROO8-_
'* ;~-
~
"'~~... ~ ~....-
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO SUBJECT TO THE CONDIDONS OF
BUILDING AREA.
GROUND FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
TOTAL ENCLOSED
.
.
.
~
11.500
9,910
8.540
29.950
SF
SF
SF
SF
LANDSCAPING 10'1. . 1800 SF
PARKING 2.26 SPACES PER UNIT (x 15!-
TOTAL REQUIRED 34 SPACES
TOTAL PROVIDED 34 SPACES 12 HANDICAPPED)
CONSTRUCTION TYPE. V . I HR I type
OCCUPANCY TYPE. R-llS3
ALl.OWASLE AREA. BASE - 2 YARDS -
10.500 x 1.5 x 2 x 2
ALLOWABLE PER FLOOR. 10.500 x t5 x 3
2 atorles
FIRE SPRINKUNG
. 83.0qO sf
. 47,250 sf
COMBINED LOT AREAS . 17.815 SF LOT 7.8. AND 9
MAX. LOT COVERAGE 85'1. . n.500 SF USED 10.778 eo % SF
PROPOSED 11 -2 BEDROOM. .2 STUDIOS AND 2 SINGLE BEDROOM UNIT OVER PARKING
15 UNIT TOTAL WITH 3 LOW INCOME UNITS EQUIVALENT TO 20"1. OF THE UNITS
PROJECT INFORMATION
/'?'--
. ......
/ ....
'~:;/:. //,.
/.
PROPOSED 15 UNIT APARTMENT UNIT
)l
~
~~~
I..~
- ~
~
""'"'
ir::
I
___I. If -----..
~
~lJIJLUjLlUl
Jl
JliUJ
Jl
-
=
II
-'
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
---
/"'>
./
//
.~:?
X
i
PROPOSED
MUl TI-lJNIT APARTMENT
. BUILDING
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
I
I
REVISED 2-8-02
ANTOMO M. BRANDI
ARCRTECT we. 0-8738
TEL. 180- _ _ FAX 180- I71I18l12
llOI LARCH AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA rMOaO
ABRAIClIAoAOI..COM
001'&0
"'II~':~~
~~ ~ HOrI< <>f the
tec:t___~
1:>lo~_.ordIaG
.. lI1e _ eclI1NrIt <>f the
~~:~
t::lP f:h& ."'w-Ghlbscl trll~ ~~
~by~U..' ..
@
TIl1.E
COVER SHEET
JOB NO. 030100
. SCALE AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY BRAtflII ASSOC.
DESKHD BY A.M. BRANDI
CIfCXBl BY AM. BRANDI
DAlE g.3~1
A-O OF
~ T~
6' H1iSH ~
AT ~ UN!!
T'!1"lc.ol. . -
g
!i -"
N
~
9
!
~
~S~I
.....::.. ........ . ..= _ .._ 1 LJ
.. ." .....: g...... 1 .....:
~~
GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1/8-.. 1',O-@ @
11If'.... 1/.2-
;.
--
~-"I .112"
tMGRS.PARKUlQ
33
-
-
a',,12'
TREE HOU9E
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
.L
;-
-f
~
SETBACK
@
A-'1
OF
i:I
..
5'1!:P!"lN5
5TaNl!S --
~
~-~
=~
~-~
I
I
~+==
1_..__. .__ /1
4
n
.1
II
1-1
.'
..
.,
~
r~
I
DN.
4
1-1
.'
..
.,
BASEMENT PARKING
PLAN
-- --
- -
-- -
.., - ..--
---- -
--------
w
>
<
..l
<
i
o
t)
JOB NO.
SCALE
DRAWN BY
DESI(E) BY
CIECK8l BY
DATE
030100
AS SIfOWN
BfIAN)// ASSOC.
A.1t BRANJI
All. BIIAN)(
9-30-01
3
:r
II
.,
'~
~
~
2
;
t
I"
::J_L !
.' I 88.804' I'.' :::::
~_a=t \2 ...
~.' ,;,;,;;,;"
_ ~ 21
- ---~
ill I ISl VISITORS
I
I 121 VISITORS
I
~
r-
I
; ~
: I IL-JJ
DJ
27
(bI
i:I
~
i'lAW- /'aCNe I
IT
3
~
..
.,
f
B~
l-_
~
11]1
SITE / FLOOR PLAN
REVISED 2-8-02
ANTONO M. BRANDI
ARCHITECT we. 0-8738
l1!L.UD-__ FAX_m_
804 LARCH AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA Q.C08O
ABRANDCAoAOl..COM
HOlE>
All ~ _ ....1Itcon mat.rial
appe~~In~~l:he
~Itec>t _~ """"'...... not
~~j~~~
....c:hltec:t.d~~ ~~
~_tsct....... otto.orwl8e
agr-a8d toy =nlract.
@
TITLE
,.......,
RAMP UP.
Q
;!
m~
....... .....
..... ..... i ==
'V-
HANDICAPPED
1218 SF I UNIT L
@ [EJ 111
o V'
-
-
.
1
@
~
51C>e YNID
0)
~"I.
80
OAK AVENUE! @
. ::/0'-0"
iiiiiViWAY
..:::,
@
ae'~ :E~~ALK
J
.i'4''''.1
_I.
f
t
1
..
~~
~
2
H GONe. I!lI.DClC: i'lAW-
~ YARD
~, .~ G
41
!i
ill' HleH ~
AT~
1'Yl"1GAl.
"
~~,~.~
j
!!l
UNE
*-
;
t
I
112
[]
lU
UNDERGROUND
~
I..... I
PARKING
I
+
I
I
!
I
I
I
1
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
,.
...../~..
~.
../
77
'/'
",/~/"
~
+4'..,.
0J
,
PROPOSED .
. 7
MUL TI-UNIT APARJJ~ENT
BUILDING
;.
In
V "
,I
"
.'
...
1'1
3 j' ,
,I
-
"
-'
ill
-
4 ,I
-
~
II
..
-
5 -1i'
:;
III
"7
1
,I
SECOND LEVEl.. FLOOR PLAN
~
--
A
-;
,
-1-
W/I4
!!'
~/'"
&1"2.~
g
r
I!\
1'1
"
7
g
"
....
r
.'
II
1'1
/
g
I'll
.'
!Il'
"-
g
r
f:l
.-
71 :
t:
J;
~
/ ;;
""/,/" ,/./~~
/
/
/
B
- ~
.014'-4. "- .014,..,.
'"'7 - -
~.c. H JIAILJNI -~
I"l.N<IIOl ~
JJlt:l-
I"
@
-1
~
1 1
-
j
In
0 I ,,,-
I,
-'
ill
~
...
1'1
~
in
II
@
"J.'~
~ lie' . r-o-
~
~
",-.,..
Il r @)
= ~ t __ ,- U L.- ~
~ : ~~ flv 2 BEDROOM Y
r~ ~ L~J[). ~6 A
~. --, I..l ~\j
I .. - ' 7 - ~ f":'< ~ .Q' Ir ' /V
I I?o;.-( .x- I../"':: ~ ~
· ~ 'r) :ibl v --;;
,k~ - ~!.O ~ ~EJ~ B _ ~ '1
o ~ .'l>. . Ira n tFr ~;J. .,
~ ~ ~UU~S'mL 2
:3 0..- 4'. ~ 1 BEDROOM r-I_ ~
2f Q QI'"-. . ~ I ~ 0
J ...... ..... F.=
S JLj] QI ~ r- tR f'.. ~~
~ ~~. . ," X ~ L ~a ~
~~IW~ -( .: 'co. .~J~ (8] rjp -~l ~I
c - (III- '--' J IIOnTln~ 1"1 Iglll ,
@ I r,..J . ~ [] ~. II ~ 1-:~
.- ,- >- (OJ =l3 ] ~
~ J L ~ (. .~D i (OJ f8 ~ ~
fs:D i55 U ~ - X 0 ^' ~E-
~-8J ~B~ ~ O-;~ r'\:'~ ~ ~~ '
/" J:l}'-u '. -111\ ^"7 @ I ~
I' ~ \ 14 .
~. I~ ~ ,[) ...... ,/' I;............ '~I_ r f:l
~5:Y":- [) L'" , 1 I -
~-==C=:.b dB 'l>. i '- J L
T ~E-
@ I I~:'j !A~- -H+t. I+H ~,1
.- -1. L ,- ~. ~ f' -= ~ I ~
... L C
o02"H_
"
A
THIRD LEVEL
..
1'1.00R PLAN
.014'-4.
-.o,:z'III~
@
J~.
t
I
;
...--'
l'
"-
&'-;2.
1"-
1/ /
./
/
/
C
-7
-7
:;/
/
/
PROPOSED'
MUL Tl-UNlT APARTMENT
BUILDING
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
REVISI!D 2-8-02
ANTONO IiI..BRANDI
AACtIT1!CT we. C-8738
TEl.. 8110- _._ FAX IIlIII- m_
lI04 LARCH AVE.
SOUTH SAN 'FRANCISCO, CA lMOBO
A8RA/IIDIAeAOLCOM
NOTe.
A11~~~
~:'CI_c:l""""<>fthe
end. aC211S mc:u nat
~~c:lG::-t~
~~~:":;::l<
of the _ ...._ atllsrwl!oe
ogr<oec1 t:IJ ~t.
@
TITLE
FLOOR PLANS
JOB NO. 030100
SCALE AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY BIlAM)Jf ASSOC.
DESIGte BY A.M. BRANIlI
CHEQ(B) BY A.M. BRAM1I
DAlE 9-30-01
-
A-2 OF
SCALE
I VB-.
1-0"
A -3 OF
FRONT ELEVATION
~-'i~~
....BT1IIII .........
~
..........,.,.UO!
PIJT ~ IlUlCI<
........~
.............UIe
..........~ ".,..
JOBHO.
SCALE
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CIfCKB) BY
DAlE
030100
AS SHOWN
IlROO/I ASSoc.
AM. BRAM1l
A.M. BRANDI
9-30-01
-
2ND U!VEl-
.-n4JRC' L.eVa.
"",.,..
~
.......w..T' MNaJ!It
6Il2""","~~
BLDG. ELEVATIONS
AACHrTBrr we. 0-8738
T1LUO-__ PAIl_m_
804 LARCH AVE.
SOlJ'Tlol SAN FRANCISCO. CA lM080
A8RANDIAoAOL.COM
HOTS
...11 dr~ """ HrItten __
~-"""'_Iha
ortgncIl ald .......,,_ --*: of Iha
~t ald lhe ...... """l not
t:lD <luc>11-, _ or dlKloeed
H'thaul: Iha __ G<lI1Il<Int. of Iha
.~~teet. ~~~7
~_...._~....
ogreec:t by GCIrIir'Q:i.
- @
TITLE
REAR ELEV A TJON
_ _,.-.J ...... ~ ~ L-...... <:l:O<e.1II.<lCII:
~_ UII! JoW.L..,.,.,.,c.o.L
c.AL. *'Tml ce-r. '"
6'.... ~
_'I'I"I"IC.O.L
..-.,. UIIJ
_T~
M:z IWXlP" LQfIII! ~
L
.:~,~"'"
..:... ..-
,"..r.-
......-
.,.,.,.,......
IIX8TIN8 _
I .'_........
-~
~.,..
~ ~......
.-
----.- --
AEVJSED 2-8-02
ANT~ M. BRANDI
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
I
.-'
,.
..../ "
'.,/
/
/'
,.f""/~'
;/
/"
PROPOSED
MUL TJ-UNIT APARTMENT
BUILDING
!
--_./
I
I
SIDE ElEV A TJON (RIGHTI
-.
-.,
-,
"--:
--
'"
,
[
SIDE ELEVATION (lEFT)
--j
i
-, ,","FlD i.EIIeL.
1
. 2Nl:l ~
1m
./' ./
'.~./"
/
--
~,
"/
/'
-/"/"
1m
.' HI6M ;olOOCl
I'eNa! "1"l'1"Ic;AL.
~
/
'/ / -~PROPOSED
... ..,.
/ MULTrUM[ APARTMENT
--
BUILDING
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
-
~ 2-B-02
ANTOND ... 8RAND1
ARCIiITEc:I' uc. 0-873a
TEl.. Il1O- &88.. !'AX lIIIlI- en _
904 I.NICH AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRAIICI8CO. CA ll4OBO
A8RAJClIIrwAOLCOM
NOTIio
~p~_":.=-~'
~axi~"""""":!tIs
Ioe dul>11Gated......a. Qt' ~d
IolItI1aut !tis ...._ cor-.t <If !tis
==~:~
Of !:he Ht:hlteGt _ D~
cq-eed I:>J --
@
l1TI.E
BLDG. ELEV A nONS
JOB NO. 030100
SCALE AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY BRAtOI ASSOC.
DESIGNED BY A.M. BIIAMlI
-
aEKED BY AM. BRANIlI
DATE 9-3Oil1
SCALE . va" - 1'-0" A-4 OF
GXI
\1Y
~ ve- . 1'-0-
'f/
.."-,-
, .
/"
,~.'
/
SUIt. T UP ROO!"
TTFIGAI..
~
T'l'I"IGAI..
~T 5H1NSL.e
6/12 ROO!" Sl.DI"E TY1"ICAI...
-l
ROOF PLAN
"
~~..~
"\-
'\\-
~,
"\-~
~~~lBnBr
I
-6'
:~
"'.//"- /" ,
,,/ .//
/
/ -"
DORMI!R
TTFICAl.
'~T 9HINeI.E5
6/12 ROO!" llI.OI"!! 'lYP'1GAI..
!lUll. T lJI" ROOI'
TTFlCAI...
PROPOSED
MULTI-UNIT APARTMENT
BUILDING
90 OAK AVE.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
REVISED z.8-02
ANTONO M. 8RANDI
ARCttTECT uc. Q-8738
TI!L__2111 J"AX_m_
904 LARCH AVE.
SOUTH SAN FHANCISCO. CA Q.408O
ABRANDlAeAOLCOM
NOTe.
All ~co;;,-=-~
~~I__oftho
aid 6QI1lI ~
~1Iot.1tdd. llNd, &>r _
tho -.... c:.or-.t of _
~~F","tho--=
~Hd1ttect ..._ths~
~ by CClnlroct.
@
TITLE
ROOF PLAN
JOB NO. 030100
SCALE AS Sl<<)WN
DRAWN BY BRAtaI ASSOC.
DESIGNED BY AJt BRANII
CImED BY AJt BIWtlI
DAlE 9-30-01
-
A-5 OF
./:-/
90 OAK .AVENUE ' -:
IalT _AY r-NEW SIDEWALK ,~~/ . //
_~ I / '
. ~. i
-t- 1_ 1 '1/ I . ;
#.. ._ llU4' ..................... . ..:.......:..::.:..::............... '. .. .~~I:~~ .".
i!;;I J, 1'= ..~~:... ~.v.:'h' ''X, .:/. . .... ... ~:A...~ .
~ ~. :....:::......:.:.~.~ '.::.:.':f(...::"'::',,: '.. .::.......:.:.:-~:::~ -4' CONe. R,J,MP :' . ~
9?~.. . ~....... ..~.. ..... ......::0.. . '::l'jj;':~.:':'" ..
.. .. .. : if::' ::. ..... ....... ':., : .: ....:.:.17: :
.. ..... ........... ~... ... \').':... ..:.~. . ~{~'."'''' ~. ,-" .,-~
. . . . ... . .. .... . ..... ...... r'".;..... p -...~. ~
!j:" ". : i "., ...,:;S;;;:. '.:' ........... ....~:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.:.:.,,::~ ~. "~~U I:..
.... ~....:.~.....:.:.:..........:...:...:.:.:.::.:....: . :'.'lio. "'1
9= ....7'::............... .. .. ......... . .................... 1'~~Jl: n: c~. . ...
.' ":1 \'\ II' ~ i
.. I I
I 28 I:' . ',;.j 'j -ISl= 4' CONe i'IAUc: '\ \;
- - - - - - - -..J " . , HANDICAPPED - +1- . M . . .
, I III VISITORS : . 1218 SF I UNIT /" -LU &' CONe. &l.QCI' ". , . ,.. ~
' "'. - ",..---.. r..LU. . """'" .
. I ,'. (15) ~~ . ~. .
' 121 VISITORS :.' ~ In tl::m::-:':'~ . . I.;;;;:. ---. q ~
I ":::1 ':.': ..~ ~
. . . ... 'r.-r. .... .
:.: v:..:..:. ,-~ J ~. :-i:L:
-" ... -- ---- - - ~ :.:,:,:.:.:.:.1 ~- '/-:- ~-------/ . ~-:
__110\,.. J - 1'::':":1 / I' 'U ."
I '. . .:.: 6. J"EoI. <5II!A~---' i ' ~ D~IN :. . i
1 .... ~J:>!!CIC;' QOIf.~ . ~.
- ,n r=2 D . ::':::::::::: '1 0 PlANTER DET AlL . . .' .
I i8 f "'\ ~ :iI 2 11...'-0. .'. .
IO . JI[l( n= l ~"l;i all.
Wl1 I~l/' :::e:. A.
~ 0.....,~ '" ~ :> - !:f5.~ . _~ _ . .
BASEMENT BELOW ~~~w - ". ... ~.:.:v ~ ,c::...tII:;:'I? ~ . ' ......)):~
~~ ,.....>.;'1 ~.4 0 .....'-(:'
- /f";-f f/ . - :. 0 .", l.t::v 2 .'~ '. . . . r-
"//7 NO- P~-'l'. .....:::.; r. ~ 1 . . .
~ // ## -" #' h ....., .... 0".. . . , ...
\rI\. '#'~#'~~ ~ d L/..... [;]: ~.. <--:. ~ r---l ~~) - .~ ..t:. ::::'~
JbJI ~f ~/~ /\ ~ S:. iIlIl' [j1I ;..; ... ~
_ i2',;, .,f7f"/7'7'T// _ --= ~ -'. l'lt'. ,,,"
- - -. -, - - LAUN RY.'M r.;;1~ ,::, I 2ND.~"A'lll ~ ~ .1-
In = CJI",. . - -' -' ... -' .
H U - EJ i~ 1>:. L _ ...J ....
....""" 0. ~ . ~.. _~3-~:;.~_ ~ ..
n DECORATIVE ROCK- ~, I _.::) '1' UPP5.q DECK LANDSCAPE ~./'
~ . IT .~::.'~. ......... J, i r (:J SECTION / DETAIL 11... f-OO I ~:
In J, 111 1.1 ."_""'00 -: .. ..
i ...... ..
..... . .
..... .. .
'.. . >- ::: . . :::. :
':','. :'" 1--:. . 'tl . . '. .
= LOW WALL ::'::'" ':.. ) I-- ~: -6' HltSH ~' ~H~" . -', ....
, .: ....T~1.INe! 'i;:" '\. . .
. \ '. 'TYl-ICAI- r1' '-\\
/ . - ::' '.' /J" . ".
-- .
, i ~I.....J' _ :: 0 Y/!'~" 1JliQ',', I't.
/ X -":
~ RAMP DN. 5% " RAMP DN. 18 % .::
- --:- /// / \\ - 'l-:: l.ANl:>9C.oAoI"e ARl!W> UPPER DeCK I.ANDSCAPE PLAN ~"
, -- .
/ \ iii.,....., .:' I
- - ~/ \ III '-'!:: I
_ / I I 1m. 7': ,.-- - :
......fJ7:l.$ - - - .:...............~..................... ~................~.. II - - ----.!
" ~. . - I 1 1 I' I I I ~~._~'
' &'xJ:2;' " =i=:=J ~ DOC" ',,", ace V::' , ,....I-\.,A \
$ .... ': - ....."::.. - - - mO. ..:,' ..;.;. l-m.:'. v I y~ . \
tee. . HOUSE, . .,-~....~..:.....,'.".T,Jtt........ . '.:." .-.~:=M.j..- ",' DOC .' ' OPEN nCEIT' Y'''''A 'Dca r ..~
. . ~.,.~ +.......,'""""T{ I{ J..... "....- ...":( QCD...". - I'!n~~... aco . .~
.. " . ", ',' '.,", .c+... +.... . "I,.. J" ++ ~ ~~~ <D....~ ..:.... .... ':. .... ~~~ . ":~ .
L!'./f'.... . I I I ~W"~..-'b....m.+~~. . "l""+ ~ g. liiii!il . I . SAND..PIT- .... ~u.' ~USE'. ':l":
'W' I. - . . " ... ~ ~.' ... ... ... .. .. .... ....... _ t--- DDCDOOQOnct'uUJnn UOQOt/UOLlULHoJOCClOCCCCDconCDD :.
' , ,~,l. ~.:..:.::.+~I'r .. '+ +,' . ..' +'. it: '. '-- DDDCDDeDDaceaala:~gg~g"c~cDDeDCDeeDaa (/1:.. 1 ~
:;:: J' ~ ~ ~ ---;;.=--~ . LIIUO - ~ ~-=
GROUND FLOOR PLAN lIB. .1'-0' 8 81 @ ~.~_T _=T1~
@
~
I
I
I
I
() i
M~f::KIN~
. I
J...
SPRINKLEA NOTE
AU.. P"LAN'l'INiS AREAS SHALL ee IRRliSATEP i"UTH
AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKl.f:R S'l'SreM
1/8"
'2- OlJ'Tl::IOOR 6RAC.KET L.115Hr i"UTH MOTION SeNSOR
I!J Ol/Tt:lO~R P"OL.E LliSHT
- CONe:.. FL.OOR I"V SAL. T FINISH
15'-0.
8ETSACK
'J.:
Q
C\I
@
1
GAS METERS
A
/
c
i
l
~
fIfE
I..:.:.::.: TREES
...... $" .24'eax~SHOI"lN
I NeW ISiSAL.. TRee
\ 1"0PC:;11.US Nl6RA IT Al..ICA
\: L.OMElARC'r' P"OI"L.AR
',,-_/
O. HESe Sf"eGIES
STAND~ SHRUEl
PLANT l.JST
r.::::::::::7l
~
~
I+'.~.~+~
. . + .
SHRUBS
Q I iSAL.. HCMeROGAL.L1S
e~~'l"!l..l..01^l
ON "l.AN~
i I"'fRACANTHA (SANTA CIW%)
GROUND COVER
I"RA5RARlA CHIL.0eN5IS (WlL.tl S~)
fl..ATS 1:2. o.c.
Fel?JIoIOOD BARK
A~AL$ ..J.JM6O 6 P"AKS . 6. O.C.
5 iSA!..
-j
L-1
LANDSCAPE PLAN
ARCHITECT Uc. c-a73B
'lEI. _ _ _ PAX 8110- B7l _
9GI LARCH AVE.
SOU11i SAN FRANCISCO, CA ll408O
ABRANDlA.AOL.COM
NOn:. -
A11~hloI~.~~
=1 ~~ ........_ HOrI: .., ths
~ .....a. __ IIICIj not
be ,,**,11cal:ed. wed, t:r __
HIIllaUI:__~..,1h<o
Ar-chItecL Full __ foro the ....".~
~~the___
i:>f ths _ l1li1_ olherw....
"!reed by ~t.
TITLE
'/
PROPOSED //
" ../
MUL n-OO APARTMENT
BUILDING
JOB NO.
SCALE
DRAWN BY
DESJGrS) BY
CIEKED BY
DATE
OF
030100
AS SIIlWN
BRANlII Assoc.
AJA. BRMG
AJA. BIIAM)l
9-30-01
@
REVISED 2-..
ANTONIO M. SRANDI
SOUTH
90 OAK AVE.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
l
I-i
lir
City of South Son Francisco Fire Department
South Son Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 829-6645
Single Family
High Density Residential
13 Condominium Units
Fire:
A T&T Network
3070 17th Street
Son Froncisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-8500
C)
~
/,~
~
+~
'45 ;:
~
::c::
I ~
4
~f' ."
I
I
,. Flood Zone c: Areos of minimal flooding. Community Ponel Number
065062 0001 S, September 2, 1981.
2. No public areas proposed at this time.
3. Topographic survey information prepared by Triad/Holmes & Assoc.,
dated 7-10-03.
4. No tree planting proposed at this time.
5. Typical setbacks are 05 follows: Front-IS' Rear-l 0' Side- 5'.
6. Building covers majority of the site and droinage will be conveyed through a
storm water clarifier to the existing municipal system in Oak Avenue.
7. Oak Avenue frontage to be improved to City Standards.
Proposed Use:
Existing Use:
Residence
Cable:
JT JOINT TRENCH
I I CONCEPTUAl SLOG LOCATION WITH POTENTIAL FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS i
FF -
-
T.M SUBMITTAL 2-3-06
Zoning:
Totol lot size:
APN:
Engineer:
~
Owner/Subdivider:
High
0.408
011-313-070, 011-313-080, 011-313-090
(one lot per instrument number 2005-058783)
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 200
Redwood City, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
Janine O'Flaherty, RCE No.
Patrick Doherty and Frances Doherty
Doherty Painting & Construction
880 Innes Avenue
San Francisco. CA 94124
ocres
Density
Residential (R-3)
35220
Gas and Electric:
Telephone:
Sewer/Storm
UTILITY
Drain/Water
ION
City of South San Francisco
315 Mople Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8550
Pacific Bell
840 West San Bruno Avenue
San Bruno. CA 94066
(650) 872-6028
Pacific Gas and Electric
450 Easlmoor Avenue
Daly City, CA 94014
(650) 872-6028
Jcnine O'F1aherty, Principal
P.L 135220
BKF ENGINEERS
LEGEND
. SANITARY SlOWER MANHOLE
~ UTILITY STUe
EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
-45- PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
SPOT ELEVATION
j
o
u
(I)
U
z
<{
cr
LL
Z
<{
(I)
I
l-
=>
o
(I)
20
EXISTING 10" SANITARY
SEWER MAIN TO BE
RECONSTRUCTED PER CITY
APPROVED OAK AVENUE
SANITARY SEWER
REPLACEMENT PLANS DATED
5-15-2003.
---r---
~f PROPOSED 2"-
.,T WA TER SERVICE
/ -
----'--- - - - ~---
GRAPHIC (FEET)
10 20
SCALE
.40
PROPOSED
BUILDING
LOCATION
PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
80
---EXISTING 10"
SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
TO REMAiN
w
OAK
A VENUE
.2"
'"
.,;
;:J
~
'"
DATE
SOURCE: 2002 YAHOO! MAPS
VICINITY MAP
NTS
ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
CIVIL ENGINEER
THIS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECTION IN ACCORDANCE 'nilri STANDARD E"NGiNEERiNG PRACTICE.
....
j K.aiser
!ermanente-S
.....,anFranciscO
a.
e(
::EW
....I::)
WZ
Ow
0:>
e(e(
a.~
We(
>0
I--
e(O
1-0)
Z
W
I--
co BKF ENGINEERS
.
II
...
.-=:
-
It')
CD
o
"" ~
OJ X
a::: <( ~
o u ~
~ ~g~
::J -I')I'}
W uco(O
0::00 I I
~~8~~
VlW3: I I
U")t:::ooo
If):)WU')1f)
N(/)D:::COto
>-
I-
Z
=>
o
u
o
W
I-
<{
::.
z
<{
(I)
<{
z
cr
o
LL
::J
<{
u
I
!:
I
I
OAK CONDOMIN UM
UNIT CONDO CONYERS ON
PRESENTATION
UTH SAN FRANC SCO
BRANDI/ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECT
PROJECT S AT ST C
-
TOTAL 13 UNITS CONDO CONVERSION
13- 2 BEDROOM UNITS (1 HAND. ACCESSIBLE UNIT)
3 LOW INCOME UNITS
TYPE V i-HR. CONSTRUCTION CONC./WOOD
LAND AREA 17,815 SF
DRIP LINE AREA 10,778 SF
LOT COVERAGE 10,778/17,815 = 610k
LANDSCAPING 100/0 1780 SF REQUIRED
1800 SF PROVIDED
PARKING REQUIRED 2.25/ UNIT x13 = 29.25
PROVIDED = 31
T
CT
-
R
E
PICTURE-1
LEF
DE
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET VIEW
UP OAK AVENUE
E
E
c'><'_"V'<"~
A, f'RO<>ER,." ~;",
,"""IC"'~
!'>,;;;re5
~,._,RO!<.
aATe"""''' -
'~
\.~/ '
a~+~
~
! GROUND
-----
OOR PLAN 1/8", 1'-O"'_~
UND LEVEL PLAN
'~--'-,-, -
SETBACK
@
~
I
2N 3RD FLOOR PLANS
..- ..- - - ........... III --
'- (0 ,A' ~i (0',
\~ ,,/ '-rj '--'
, '.' "~ 1
~~= -
~ - T;'\- ~ 6~)
< ,~ !l~PR"'.;
.- ~'-
FH~ -
__~_l'~ =
-r "
.-'1 ~
~ "
iJ,.,
-:,' _'l ~
I
, [: . l-
i (! ~
N ~ [Ir" N n (11
~ ~
- """'1p
, ,
: [ ~ :: - if
'I II
I - e' U c'
U (1- ~ ~
~
~ ]~/
~" . do
~' --~
,....'C'
I ",'
i I~!
1'-c :,
&, C-Plf
5~
, '
.- (f!
[I! ~I
;',;
1-; "
1~ ~" ~~
~. ""
--=
rl ~
.::1
0 .-wI ~i
6 6, l,,,, il
i i I:
,I'
(---;-~ _F"I<..!O...I~O'" ...1 I~
'-- '
SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
(8-
SETBACK
@
c
SPRINKLER NOTE
Ac..... "'_'>'NT'"'' ........[;;A5 S"A...... Elf RR'S
...." AL,-O....A.'C SCOC<.''''''_ER 5""=--~v
"IQ""
~ ~ASAN"''''A SA"T,>, C~'Z'
GROUND COVER
'--------, FRAGR"'RA C""~OEN5:5 ,Y{L=' 5TR....~9ERR':"j
, "'LA,S ,2' O,C
.?- O~'?OOR SRAOC:::r '- Sr.'"
~ 00"7:.?COR POLE _61-;'"
PLANT LIST
TREES
~X'-;,..;ER:;S""O"'I><
"EeE SPEC'ES
5.L....NOARD 5t"<<:c18
SHRUBS
GAl. "!EME;ROGAl..(... S
,,(Ve!'ID EVERGREEN ""ELLO",
0"< f'~A"TfRS
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
ROOF PLAN
. .
w
r ,
,
SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT
FRONT ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION LEFT
REAR ELEVATION
tl
t
ROOF OVERVIEW
......
. I ~~
""
L.J .
~ 'i '. - _ - _ '.... --t l
~-..~ .,; ."... .;...,~, .
. -
~'t\l. s:1#
~1l
~ . ~\i.\
c ~:)
>< ....
~ ~
v 0
~lI~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM#13A
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Steele, Finance Director
SUBJECT: PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-07
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting the 2006-07
Operating Budget for the City of South San Francisco.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The proposed 2006-07 Operating Budget was presented to the City Council at two Study Sessions,
on May 17 and June 7, 2006. On June 7, 2006, the City Council approved two changes to the
operating budget that are not reflecte:d in the budget document attached to this staff report, as the
docUIhent had already been printed. They are incorporated in the Budget Adoption Resolution
through reference to Exhibit B.
The two changes recommended by the Council at the June ih Study Session were:
. Restore one frozen Parks Maintenance Worker to the Public Works Department effective
July 1,2006. This position will be funded out of the General Fund and will be reevaluated
during the 2007 -08-budget process. The Public Works Department will provide quarterly
updates to the City Council during the year after this position is filled in order to evaluate the
effectiveness of this restored position in improving the appearance of parks and ball fields.
This budget change will add $85, III to the General Fund.
. Add one contract Code Enforcement Officer to the Fire Department, funded by the
Redevelopment Agency Funds, since this position will focus much work on Dovvntown code
violations. This budget change will add $108,000 to the Redevelopment Agency budget.
The Fire Department will provide monthly status reports to the City Council on the code
enforcement backlog and caseload after this contract position is filled.
Staff Report
Subject: Proposed Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2006-07
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
With the two changes listed above, the General Fund is projected to have a budget surplus of
$331,929 in 2006-07, and the Undesignated Reserve is projected to end the year with a $6,503,155
balance.
APproved:rJ;{,;{ ,(~ ~
~ agel
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A, Preliminary Operating Budget Document FY 2006-07
Exhibit B, Changes to Document Recommended at June 7 Study Session
JS/BN:ed
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STAlE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1HE 2006-07 OPERATING BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF SOUlE SAN FRANCISCO AND APPROPRIATING THE
CORRESPONDING FUNDS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
MAKE SPECIFIED EXPENDITURES AND APPROVING THE
GANN SPENDING LIMIT
WHEREAS, a preliminary draft budget for fiscal year 2006-07 was reviewed by the City
Council at study sessions on May 17 and June 7, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 2006-07 City of South San Francisco Operating Budget document is
attached hereto as Exhibit A, with recommended changes from the June 7 study session attached hereto as
Exhibit B, both of which exhibits are hereafter referred to as the "2006-07 Operating Budget."
NOW, 1HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the fiscal year 2006-07 Operating Budget for the City
of South San Francisco and hereby appropriates the funds set forth therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that consistent with the limitations set forth herein, any and
all expenditures for agreements relating to either the programs or materials contained in the 2006-07
Operating Budget or the Capital Budget 10r construction projects not to exceed $25,000 may be expended or
entered into under authority of or by the City Manager and are hereby authorized and the payments
therefore may be made by the Director of Finance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that monies received during fiscal year 2006-07 as a
consequence of a grant application approved by the City Council are hereby appropriated for the purposes
for which the grant has been approved. Such appropriation includes authorization for the City Manager
to expend such monies and for the Finance Director to make payments therefore in accordance with the
terms and conditions and for the purpose of the grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby granted the authority to
increase budgeted revenues and budgeted expenses in departments specifically for development related
expenses such as expedited plan checks, legal reviews, traffic studies, geotechnical studies, etc., where
the developers pay up front for expenses that the City contracts out for. In those cases, the Finance
Director, upon receiving those deposits or payments will increase the budget for revenues in the General
Fund and expenses in the appropriate departments where those expenses will take place by a
corresponding amount. Said transactions will have no net impact on General Fund Reserves, as revenue
will offset expenses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to increase
budgeted revenues and expenses in departments so that departments may use donations made to them.
Said transactions will have no net impact on General Fund Reserves, as revenue will offset expenses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 2006-07 budget attached hereto is
hereby officially adopted:
- By department by fund for General Fund operating budget appropriations; and
- By fund for other operating budget appropriations
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Gann Appropriations Limit attached hereto is
approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager may authorize the Director of
Finance to transfer budgets during the year in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles between the following budget categories provided the overall appropriation by funding
source is not increased without City Council approval:
- Department within the same fund; and
- Capital projects with the same funding source; and
- Operating and capital budgets for the same department if funded by the slune
funding source.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized and
directed to rollover any outstanding encumbrances from Fiscal Year 2005-06 into Fiscal Year
2006-07.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized and
directed to rollover unencumbered appropriations from grants received in 2005-06 or prior years
if so allowed under the terms of the grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the staffing levels for each department, as
detailed in the 2006-07 Operating Budget are hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized and
directed to carry forward unspent 2005-06 unencumbered non-recurring project budgets in the
operating budget such as litigation projects.
*
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the :Doregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted
by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 14 day of
June 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Sylvia M. Payne
City Clerk
Exhibit B:
Changes to Proposed Budget
From June 7, 2006 City Council Budget Study Session*:
1. Restore one frozen Parks Maintenance Worker to the Public Works Department.
Total Parks Maintenance Workers in Public Works will increase from 14.00 to 15.00
in the Summary of Budget Positions for Public Works. Restoring this position will
add $85,111 to the Public Works Department budget in the General Fund.
2. Add $108,000 to contract services in the Redevelopment Agency operating budget for
a contract Code Enforcement Officer.
* not included in Exhibit A budget document.
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
..
T ..
~ ' '. :
~!~-
Proposed Operating Budget 2006-07
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
2006 - 2007
PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Joseph A. Fernekes
Mayor
Karyl Matsumoto
Council Member
Sylvia M. Payne
City Clerk
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Pedro Gonzalez
Council Member
City Officials
Barry M. Nagel
City Manager
Steven T. Mattas
City Attorney
Richard A. Garbarino
Vice Mayor
Mark N. Addiego
Council Member
Richard Battaglia
City Treasurer
PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET FY 2006-07
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Or anization Chart, 2006-07
De artment/Division Or anization Chart
Proposed 2006-07 General Fund Operating Budget
Summa
Pro osed 2006-07 General Fund 0 eratin Bud et
Total General Fund Operating & Capital Budget, &
Chan es to General Fund Reserves
Com liance with Reserves Polic
General Fund Administrative De artments
General Fund Revenues Chart
General Fund Ex enditures Chart
General Fund 0 eratin Bud et 2006-07 Revenue Detail
General Fund Administration Allocation to other Funds
Gann A ro riations Limit
Departmental Operating Budgets:
City Attorney Department
City Clerk Department
City Council Department
City Manager Department
City Treasurer Department
Finance Department
Human Resources Department
Information Technology Services Department
Non Departmental
Economic & Community Development Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Police Department
Public Works Department
Recreation & Community Services Department
Redevelo ment Funds
Sewer Rental Fund
Parkin District Fund
Page
Numbers
2
3
4
6
8
9
10
12
13
14
17
18
21
23
27
29
33
35
41
45
51
55
67
77
85
97
111
117
121
122
TABLE OF CONTENTS Con't
Contents Page
Numbers
Storm Water Fund 123
Gas Tax Fund 124
Measure A Fund 125
Community Development Block Grand Fund 126
Common Greens Maintenance Districts 127
Solid Waste Fund 128
Misc. Special Revenue Funds 129
Misc. Other Special Revenue Funds 130
Vehicle Maintenance 131
Equipment Replacement Fund 132
Proposed Vehicle Purchases, 2006-07 133
Proposed Equipment Purchases, 2006-07 134
Deferred Equipment Replacement, 2006-07 135
Information Technolo!!V 136
Telephone System Maintenance & Replacement 137
Self Insurance Fund 138
Health & Benefit Fund 139
Summary of Budgeted Positions 141
Summary of Frozen Positions 151
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Organization Chart, 2006-2007
r Citizens of South San Francisco
I I
City Clerk " City Treasurer
City Council
Sylvia M. Payne Joseph A. Femekes, Mayor Richard Battaglia
Richard A. Garbarino, Vice Mayor
Mark N, Addiego
Pedro Gonzalez
Karyl Matsumoto
\.
City Attorney
-
Steven T. Mattas
City Manager
Barry M. Nagel
Assistant City Manager
Marty Van Duyn
I I
Police Fire Library
Mark J, Raffaelli Phil White Valerie Sommer
Public Works
I-
Econ. & Comm. Develop. Terry White Recreation and
I- - Community Services
Marty Van Duyn Human Resources
Sharon Ranals
Elaine Yamani -
Finance Info. Technology Svcs.
Jim Steele - I-
Douglas Hollis
-2-
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Department/Division Organization Chart, 2006-2007
Police
Administration
Services
Records
Communications
Investigations
Patrol
Econ. & Comm.
Develop.
Administration
Economic Development
Housing & Community
Development
Engineering
Planning
Building
Parking District
Redevelopment Agency
City ManaQer
Fire
Library
Administration
Fire Prevention
Disaster Preparedness
Emergency Medical
Services
Operations
Ad mi n istration/T echnical
Services
West Orange Library
Grand Avenue Library
Literacy Programs
Public Works
Recreation and
Community Services
Administration &
Cultural Arts
Recreation Programs
Senior Services
Childcare Services
Aquatics
Administration
Streets Maintenance
Parks Maintenance
Building Maintenance
Common Greens
Garage
Stormwater
Sewer Maintenance
Water Quality Control
Plant
Human Resources
Finance
Info. TechnoloQV
Services
Administration/Budget
Accounting & Financial
Services
-3-
Proposed 2006-07 General Fund,
Operating Budget
Year-End Adopted Amended Projected
Actual Budget Budget Actual
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06
Total Revenues and Other
Financing Sources $ 53,573,969 $ 53,920,263 $ 57,580,170 $ 59,305,061
Operating
Budget Expenditures 52,770,537 54,256,013 54,877,284 54,877,284
Net Operating Budget Impact $ 803,432 $ (335,750) $ 2,702,886 $ 4,427,777
Less Transfers to Capital
Projects: -338,493 (82,000) -803,330 -803,330 -1,375,000
Less Transfers to Debt Service -136,154 (130,000) -130,000 -130,000 -130,000
Net Impact on General Fund $ 328,785 $ (547,750) $ 1,769,556 $ 3,494,447 $ (1,087,960)
Reserves
-4-
Proposed 2006-07 General Fund,
Operating Budget
Year-End Adopted Amended
Actual Budget Budget
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06
Revenues and Other
Financing Sources
Property Taxes 11,076,530 11,538,588 11,326,042
ERAF One Time Refund from
County 1,337,037 650,000 1,521,298
Sales Tax 10,975,749 11,525,384 11,614,273
Transient Occupancy Tax 4.518,293 4,800,000 5,150,000
Motor Vehicle In Lieu Fees 2,977,292 2,735,600 4,433,834
Revenue from Other Agencies 1,212,142 1,238,536 1,228,731
Franchise Fees 2,710,213 2,850,000 2,850,000
Business License 1,771,282 1,665,000 1,760,000
Building and Fire Permits 2,479.694 2,750,000 2,925,000
Charges for Services 4,970,407 5,456,900 5,340,500
Fi nes 971,050 1,083,000 1,090,000
Interest 433,264 476,000 525,000
Net Change Investment Value -5,750
Rent 2,485,932 2,450,000 2,500,000 2,520,000
Administrative Charges 2,133,950 1,986,774 1,986,774 1,986,774
Other 688,986 590,981 670,981 654,004
Transfers In 2,837.897 2,123,500 2,285,921 2,285,921
Total Revenues: 53,573,969 53,920,263 57,208,354 58,933,245
Plus Prior Year Carryovers 371,816
Total Revenues and Other
Financing Sources $ 53,573,969 $ 53,920,263 $ 57,580,170 $ 59,305,061
Expenditures
Administration 5,245,715 5,047,150 5,103,525 5,103,525
Economic & Comm. Dev, 3,604,232 3,204,298 3,403,759 3,403,759
Fire 13,879,185 14,326,262 14,443,703 14,443,703
Library 4,413,823 3,973,722 4,204,821 4,204,821
Police 15,114,206 16,022,135 16,033,421 16,033,421
Public Works (formerly
Maintenance Services) 5.440,885 7,157,884 7,163,493
Recreation and Community
Services 5,072,491 4,524,562 4,524,562
Subtotal, Operating
Budget Expenditures 52,770,537 54,256,013 54,877,284 54,877,284
Net OperatIng Budget Impact $ 803,432 $ (335,750) $ 2,702,886 $
-6-
Total General Fund Operating and Capital Budget,
& Projected Changes to General Fund Reserves
Proposed Budget, 2006-07
Emergencies
1,100,000
1,100,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
15;437;266
Net Operating Budget Impact (from Table I)
Adopted Amended Proiected
Year End Budget Budget Budget
o 4-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06
803,432 (335,750) 2,702,886 4,427,777
(338,493) (82,000) (803,330) (803,330)
(136,154) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000)
$ 328,785 $ (547,750) $ 1,769,556 $ 3,494,447
Less Transfers to Capital Projects:
Less Transfers to Debt Service
Net Impact on General Fund Reserves
IGeneral Fund Reserves Projection
I. Discretionary Reserves!
Liquid Reserves Available
Economic Contingencies
3,500,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
4,125,000
Designated for future Economic Development and
Capital Projects
3,600,000
3,600,000
3,600,000
4,970,000
Undesignated Reserve
4,125,250
3,893,030
5,838,520
6.190,226
'''.......__.__.,.___.._......"........u...........,.._.,.."........."............._............'___.,..............."..........___.n......_........,_....".
......n.............,...,........_,..............__......,___.."'...........__n.........--......___.._..........".'''.... ...__....__....___......__, ,..
..,-,......... . _._..____,_,_ "."_,,......___.._ ._n.............". '.... ,..... ___n.... ,..,__,_________._"."". .._............ ... d___.....,_____,.'..-.. '.
, SlibtotaJ;Discretiomlry; ,(A vl'lllabl(!),Aeserves, "
;'$12;325,250 $ 12,393,030" $1-4,338,52() $:16,485,226' $15,397;266
II. Non-Discretionary Reserves!
Reserves Already Committed
Encumbrances
381,400
371,816
Advances to Other Funds
Inventory and Other
40,300
90,000
90,000
Appropriated Capital Projects
283,830
Subtotal;: ~on Discretionary(qonlmlttedjReserve~::$, '''<705,530' $" '90,000,$ 0461,816 '$'
Total General Fund Reserves
$ 13,030,780 $ 12,483,030 $ 14,800,336 $ 16,525,226
-8-
City of South San Francisco
Proposed Reserves Policy
2006-07
SUMl\1ARY:
A summary of General Fund Reserves is listed below.
Fund/Reserve Reserve Target Recommendation Status as of 2006-07/ Does Reserve
Fall within Target
Recommendation?
General Fundi $1.2 rnillionl2 % of General Fund $1.2 millionlMeets Target
Reserve for operating budget
Emergencies
General $4,0 millionl7% of General Fund $4.0 millionlMeets target
FundlEconomic operating budget
Contingencies
General $2.9 million minimum/5% of $6.6 millionlExceeds minimum,
FundlUndesignated General Fund operating budget. No within Policy guidelines.
Reserve maximum set.
General Fundi No target. Reserve is a result of the $3.6 million, exceeds minimum,
Reserve for Future Downtown Redevelopment Fund within Policy guidelines.
Economic paying back some advances to the
Development & City.
Capital Projects
-9-
Proposed
Budget 2006-07
General Fund Administrative Departments
Change
Amended Proposed from
General Fund Actual Adopted Budget Budget Adopted %
Administrative Depts. 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
City Attorney 691,464 442,947 442,947 452,858 $9,911 2.2%
City Clerk 379,327 367,956 369,783 350,068 -$17,888 -4.9%
City Council 184,158 197,313 201,633 206,807 $9,494 4.8%
City Manager 698,724 635,441 635,896 688,615 $53,174 8.4%
City Treasurer 42,093 37,260 37,260 38,699 $1,439 3.9%
Finance 1,561,534 1,592,922 1,602,472 1,639,163 $46,241 2.9%
Human Resources 729,973 884,874 925,097 922,189 $37,315 4.2%
Non-Departmental (1) 958,442 888,437 888,437 864,015 -$24,422 -2.7%
Total 5,245,715 5,047,150 5,103,525 5,162,414 115,264 2.3%
(1) Non-Departmental includes stipends to the Housing Authority
-10-
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006 - 07
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
All Other
Administrative Services
Franchise Taxes
Charges for Services
Motor Vehicle License
Fees
Transient Occupancy
Tax
Sales Tax
Property Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Motor Vehicle License Fees
Charges for Services
Building & Fire Permits
Franchise Taxes
Administrative Services
Rent
All Other
22.2%
22.3%
9.8%
7.5%
8.8%
5.3%
5.1%
3.5%
4.4%
11.2%
100.0%
-12-
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006 - 07
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
By Department
Library
Administrative
Departments
Recreation &
Community Services
Economic & Community
Development
Public Works
Fire
Police
Administrative Departments
City Council
City Clerk
Treasurer
Attorney
City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Information Tech.
Non-Departmental
9.0%
0.36%
0.61%
0.07%
0.79%
1.20%
2.85%
1.60%
0.00%
1.50%
Economic & Community Development
Fire
Police
Public Works
Recreation & Community Services
Library
5.0%
25.9%
30.5%
14.1%
8.2%
7.3%
100.0%
-13-
GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET
2006-07 REVENUE DETAIL
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Projected
OPERATING REVENUES Revenues Budget Budget Actual Rev Budget
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Secured Property Tax 9,850,129 10,575,847 10,524,068 10,600,000 11,258,074
Unsecured Property Tax 630,232 630,000 449,233 236,609 505,232
Supplemental-Secured 667,902 442,741 442,741 700,000 500,000
Other Property Taxes 29,402 20,000 27,456 20,000
County Administration Fee (104,179) (110,000) (110,000) (93,661 ) (100,000)
PROPERTY TAX SUBTOTAL 11,073,486 11 ,538,588 11,326,042 11,470,404 12,183,306
County ERAF Refund 1,337,037 650,000 1,521,298 1,871,955 750,000
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX 12,410,523 12,188,588 12,847,340 13,342,359 12,933,306
Sales & Use 8,571,881 8,420,288 8,509,177 9,186,022 9,349,494
Sales Tax Audit Findings (15,852) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000)
Public Safety Sales Tax 299,547 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Prop 57 Sales Tax Flip 2,120,173 2,815,096 2,815,096 2,891,067 3,200,000
Franchise Fees 2,710,213 2,850,000 2,850,000 2,800,000 2,900,000
Peg Access 50,970 50,000 50,000 50,000
Transient Occupancy--8% 4,257,925 4,290,000 4,640,000 4,755,556 5,022,222
Transient Occupancy--1% 260,368 510,000 510,000 594,444 627,778
Real Property Transfer 559,946 500,000 500,000 435,000 450,000
TOTAL OTHER TAXES 18,815,171 19,675,384 20,164,273 21 ,002,089 21,889,494
Business Licenses 691,134 675,000 675,000 600,000 625,000
Commercial Parking Tax 1,045,608 950,000 1,045,000 1,075,000 1,125,000
Building Permits 1,748,345 2,100,000 2,275,000 2,300,000 2,250,000
Grading & Public Works Permits 120,939 50,000 50,000 175,000 125,000
Fire Permits 610,410 600,000 600,000 650,000 650,000
Code Enforcement DB Mgmt Fee 34,540 40,000 40,000 35,000 35,000
TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 4,250,976 4,415,000 4,685,000 4,835,000 4,810,000
Traffic & Court Fines 875,988 1,000,000 1,007,000 825,000 1,000,000
Library Fines 78,862 83,000 83,000 70,000 73,000
Administrative Citation Fines 16,200 25,000 17,000
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES 971,050 1 ,083,000 1 ,090,000 920,000 1 ,090,000
-14-
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Projected
OPERATING REVENUES Revenues Budget Budget Actual Rev Budget
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Federal Grant 289,736 289,736 289,736
State Grant 79,785
Library Foundation 24,299 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,200
Ca. Library Literacy Grant 81,174 40,000 45,195 40,000 40,000
Library County Grants 30,815 30,800 30,800 30,800 28,300
Ca. Library Service Act 490,419 401,000 423,000 420,000 371,500
Senior Citizens Grant 1 02,784 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500
State Booking Fee Reimbursement 155,145
Property Tax in lieu of MVLF 2,312,100 2,427,600 3,047,162 3,047,162 3,993,758
Motor Vehicle License Fees 665,191 308,000 1,386,672 1,400,000 367,461
POST Reimbursement 18,281 50,000 18,000 18,000 18,000
Homeowner Tax Relief 121,346 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000
Mandate Cost Reimbursement 66,597 125,000 125,000 100,000 125,000
Traffic Signal Maintenance 14,740 20,000 15,000 15,000 1,500
Off Highway Vehicle Fees 2,122 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Property Abatement Reimbursement 5,398
Summer Youth Employment 500 500 500 500
Intergovt. Program Reimbursement 19,235 290,000
Other Agencies 5,000 5,000 5,000
TOTAL FROM OTHER AGENCIES 4,189,433 3.974,136 5,662.565 5,927,698 5,227,719
City Forces General 45,673 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000
County Task Force Reimbursement 310,000 310,000 310,000 360,000
Police Service Charges 427,421 250,000 250,000 225,000 250,000
Communications Service-Colma,
Brisbane 84,295 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000
Police Recovery Charges 24,581 50,000 50,000 40,000 40,000
Fire Service Fees 1,610 10,000 5,000 2,600 5,000
Paramedic Service Fees (ALS) 1,051,671 1,186,000 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,150,000
BLS Transport Service Fees n3,200 423,200 400,000 425,000
Paramedic Intern Training 2,400
Restitution Damages 8 1,000 1,100 3,000 1,000
Large Developement Reimburse 420,919 300,000 300,000
Engineering Fees 25 1,000 500 500 500
Planning Fees 145,813 125,000 150,000 250,000 175,000
Microfilm-Building 33,911 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Developer Reimbursement 114,648 20,000 20,000 200 200
Passport Processing Fee 24,505 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000
Other Reimbursement 1,095 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Building Rental Fees 324,829 284,200 300,000 300,000 300,000
Aquatic Programs 300,288 299,300 300,000 300,000 299,000
Sports/Athletics 213,555 194,850 194,850 194,850 194,850
Special Classes/Events 492,789 490,850 490,850 490,850 490,850
Playground Programs 9,653 11 ,500 11,500 11 ,500 11 ,500
Child Care Programs 997,465 975,000 975,000 975,000 980,000
Adult Day Care 164,198 174,000 174,000 174,000 164,000
Senior Programs 47,684 69,500 54,000 54,000 59,000
Community Gardens 1,875 3,000 2.000 2,000 2,000
Sale of Printed Material 3,499 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Miscellaneous Library Charges 11,993 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500
Library DVD rental fee 24,370 25,000 25,000 25,000
S, Airport/United Parking 2,035 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
City Administrative Fees 2,133,950 1,986,n4 1,986,n4 1,986.n4 2,018,500
TOTALCHARGES-CURRENTSVCS 7,104,358 7,443,674 7,327,274 7,406,174 7,134,900
-15-
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Projected
OPERATING REVENUES Revenues Budget Budget Actual Rev Budget
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Rent 2,440,005 2,450,000 2,500,000 2,450,000 2,472,000
Cell Rental 45,926 70,000 60,000
Interest Income Investment 438,105 476,000 525,000 525,000 600,000
Interest Income Miscellaneous (4,841)
Unrealized' GainsILosses (5,750)
TOTAL USE OF MONEY & 2,913,446 2,926,000 3,025,000 3,045,000 3,132,000
PROPERTY
Claims Settlement 5,000 5,000
Sale of Property 4,377 520
Miscellaneous Donations 53,271 30,000 30,000
Communications Charges 80,981 80,981 80,981 85,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 20,421 5,000 5,000 57,503 5,000
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 78,070 90,981 120,981 169,004 90,000
SUBTOTAL 50,733,027 51 ,796,763 54,922,433 56,647,324 56,307,419
INTERFUND TRANSFERS:
Gas Tax 1,035,960 1,036,000 1,036,000 1,036,000 836,000
Redevelopment Funds 418,000
Federal Grants Fund 156,351 26,500 188,921 188,921 26,500
CDSG Fund 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
DonationfTrust Accounts 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Parking District Fund 75,000
Health and Benefits Fund 972,765 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 700,000
Self Insurance Fund 86,250
Special Revenue Funds (Day in the
Park) : 58,571 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
TOTAL FUND TRANSFERS 2,837,897 2,123,500 2,285,921 2,285,921 1 ,623,500
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 53,570,924 53,920,263 57,208,354 58,933,245 57,930.919
-16-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
General Fund Administrative Allocation
to other Funds, 2006-07
Change
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 to Adopted
Fund Description Adopted Adopted Proposed Budget
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program (ANIP)* 9,099 9,460 10,000 540
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) * 32,844 32,844 32,000 (844)
West Park Maintenance Districts 1 &2 60,204 62,610 65,000 2,390
West Park Maintenance District 3 57,527 59,830 62,000 2,170
Stonegate Maintenance District 56,344 58,600 61,000 2,400
Willow Gardens Maintenance District 57,054 59,340 62,000 2,660
Point Grande Maintenance District 1,050 1,090 (1,090)
Solid Waste Fund 16,089 16,730 17,000 270
Oyster Point CIP 236,204 25,000 (25,000)
Redevelopment Agency (Total) 530,773 801,000 833,000 32,000
Sewer Fund 55,142 57,348 60,000 2,652
Water Quality/Sewer Fund 604,055 678,212 705,000 26,788
Parking District Fund 82,541 85,840 89,000 3,160
Storm Water Fund 24,255 25,230 2,500 (22,730)
Fund 44, Bond Redemption 4,447 4,620 2,500 (2,120)
Fund 87, Non Obligated Bonds 18,107 18,107 2,500 (15,607)
Fund 26, East of 1 o Hratfic Improvements 28,235 29,360 2,500 (26,860)
Conference Center 11,760 12,230 12,500 270
Total 1,886,000 2,037,451 2,018,500 -18,951
-17-
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Gann
Initiative or Gann Appropriations limit, was adopted by California voters in 1980 and
placed limits on the amount of proceeds from taxes that state and local governmental
agencies can appropriate and spend each year.
The limit is different for each agency and the limit changes each year. Each year's limit
is based on the amount of tax proceeds that were authorized to be spent in fiscal year
1978-79 in each agency, modified for changes in inflation and population in each
subsequent year. Inflationary adjustments are, by law, based on increases in the
California per capita income or the increase in non-residential assessed valuation due to
new construction. Population adjustments are based on city population growth or county
population growth,
For the Fiscal Year 2005-06, the City of South San Francisco's estimated tax proceeds
to be received, as well as the tax proceeds appropriated by the City Council, will, as in
prior years, continue to be under the legal limit. The appropriations limit for Fiscal Year
2006-07 is $87,434,129. This is the maximum amount of tax proceeds the City will be
able to appropriate and spend in the coming fiscal year. The City's appropriations
subject to the Gann limit are $39,271,119,
Section 9710 of the State Government Code, added in 1980 by the State Legislature,
requires a governing body to annually adopt, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the
following year. The City's fiscal year 2006-07 appropriations limit was adopted
June 14, 2006 by resolution.
-18-
GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT, 2006-07
GANN Appropriations Limit - Cumulative Percent Growth
CPI / Personal Population Change Cumulative Appropriation
Income % Change % Change Factor Change Factor Limit
1978-79 - base year -
1979-80 10.17 0,23 10.42 10.42 21,453,172
1980-81 12.11 1.33 13.60 25.44 24,371,032
1981-82 9,12 0.74 9,93 37.90 26,790,463
1982-83 6.79 0.59 7.42 48.13 28,778,332
1983-84 2,35 0.32 2.68 52,09 29,548,877
1984-85 4,74 1,72 6,54 62,05 31,481,825
1 985-86 3,74 0,60 4,36 69,12 32,855,201
1986-87 2,30 0.48 2,79 73,84 33,772,203
1987 -88 3.47 1,39 4,91 82,37 35,429,821
1988-89 4,66 0,51 5,19 91,84 37,269,963
1989-90 5,19 1,21 6.46 104.24 39,678,646
1 990-91 4,21 1.26 5,52 115,52 41,870,116
1991-92 4,14 1,56 5,76 127,95 44,283,754
1992-93 (0,64) 1,83 1.18 130,63 44,805,544
1993-94 2.72 1,62 4,38 140,74 46,769,848
1994-95 0,71 1,54 2.26 146,19 47,827,283
1995-96 4,72 0,27 5,00 158,50 50,219,960
1996-97 4,67 0,79 5,50 172.71 52,980,497
1997-98 4,67 0,77 5.48 187,65 55,881,688
1998-99 4,15 2.23 6.47 206,26 59,498,655
1999-2000 4.53 2.75 7.40 228,94 63,903,388
2000-01 4.91 2.42 7.45 253.44 68,663,438
2001-02 7,82 0,85 8.74 284,33 74,664,622
2002-03 (1,27) 0,11 -1,16 279,87 73,798,513
2003-04 2.31 0,17 2.48 289.29 75,628,716
2004-05 3,28 0.43 3.72 303,77 78,442,104
2005-06 5,26 1,16 6.48 329,94 83,525,152
2006-07 3,96 0,69 4,68 350,06 87,434,129
Note: 1987-88 to 1990-91 based on County population growtl
1991-92 based on City growtt
1992-93 and 1993-94 based on County growtt
1994 -95 through 2000-01 based on City growth, California per capita incom
2000-01 through 2006-07 based on state Department of Finance statistic
Appropriations Subiect to Limit
2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007
Proceeds of Taxes 34,440,849 34,324,300 34,482,381 39,271,119
Appropriations Subject to Limit 34,440,849 34,324,300 34,482,381 39,271,119
Current Limit 75,628,716 78,442,104 83,525,152 87,434,129
Amount Under Limit 41,187,867 44,117,804 49,042,771 48,163,010
-19-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY ATTORNEY
Contract Legal Services
-21-
CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No service level changes are proposed.
-22-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
Citizens of South San Francisco
/ "
05/06 06/07
City Clerk 1.00 1.00
(Elected)
'-
05/06 06/07
Full-Time 1.00 1.00
Part- Time 1.07 1.07
./
-23-
CITY CLERK
City Clerk
MISSION
To accurately record City Council and Redevelopment Agency proceedings;
provide access to public records; updating and safeguarding documents vital to
the City's legislative process; maintaining the City's records management and
document imaging programs; to promote openness in government by serving the
people's needs and by conducting elections in accordance with statutory
requirements.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Increased City Clerk's visibility and participation in State and County municipal
clerk organizations; elected Chair of the Northern California City Clerks
Association and entered Level II of the Master Municipal Clerk Academy.
City Council minutes completed and submitted to Council in a timely manner.
Completed Phase III of document imaging program.
Coordinated board and commission appointment process for City Council.
Coordinated City Council agenda packets for over 35 regular and special
meetings.
Processed over 700 passport applications.
Coordinated records retention purging of over 160 boxes retained at the
Corporation Yard.
Tracked over 100 certificates of liability insurance for all City departments.
Created and processed over 50 proclamations for City Council.
Processed 156 resolutions and codified 18 ordinances.
OBJECTIVES
To continue archiving documents into LaserFiche to preserve City records and to
make public records available on the Internet for public viewing.
-24-
CITY CLERK
To continue to monitor and comply with the requirements of the Maddy Act,
Political Reform Act and Conflict of Interest Code in a timely and efficient
manner.
To continue to expediently process minutes, resolutions, ordinances, contracts,
development agreements and recorded documents.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed. The City Clerk's
budget is decreasing slightly as 2005-06 included funding for the bi-annual
municipal election costs.
-25-
CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (02 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 262,707 280,283 280,283 297,498 17,215 6.1%
Materials & Services 116,621 87,673 89,500 52,570 (35,103) -40.0%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 379,328 367,956 369,783 350,068 (17,888) -4.9%
Total General Fund Budget
350,068
Passport Processing Fee Revenue
20,000
Net General Fund Contribution
330,068
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 2.00 2.00
Part-Time 1.07 1.07
Total 3,07 3.07
-26-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY COUNCIL
Citizens of South San Francisco
\
/
05/06 06/07
Council Members 5.00 5.00
(Elected)
~
-27-
CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 01 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 101,980 101,920 101,920 113,360 11,440 11.2%
Materials & Services 82, 178 95,393 99,713 93,447 (1,946) -2.0%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 184,158 197,313 201,633 206,807 9,494 4.8%
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No service level changes are proposed.
-28-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
City Manager 0.80 0.80
, "
ADMINISTRA TION
05/06 06/07
Full-Time 2.90 2.90
Note - 0.3 Positions charged to the Redevelopment Agency. These positions
are reflected in the Redevelopment Agency budget and are not included in the
above numbers. The Assistant City Manager is also the Department Head of the
Economic and Community Development Department and is reflected in that
budget.
-29-
CITY MANAGER
City Manager
MISSION
The City Manager and staff assigned to this area are charged with general
administration and management of the City, community relations,
ombudsmanship, numerous special projects, City Council coordination,
implementation of Council programs, lobbying activities, interagency coordination
and other duties as determined by the City Council. This office also provides a
resource for general information for the citizens of South San Francisco as well
as City Staff.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
. Conducted a succession planning workshop with department and division
heads to begin identifying necessary and available steps to take towards
addressing this issue
. Monitored the City's revenues and expenditures, developed appropriate
action plans and strategies related to long-range impacts of increasing
employee costs and declining revenues. Employees received a summary of
benefits indicating their total cost to the City and overall benefit to the
employee
. Completed a successful redevelopment merger
. Created and implemented our first Citizen's Academy. Sixty-eight
applications were received for the first session with twenty-five participants
completing this eleven-week course
. Brought City Newsletter "in house" for production, providing a cost savings,
opportunity to recognize employee creativity, and more input on articles and
their priority
OBJECTIVES
. Monitor and evaluate the City's organizational structure and identify
opportunities to achieve cost savings, revenue generation and appropriate
service levels
. Work with staff on the issue of succession planning and offer opportunities
to discuss and implement appropriate strategies in this area
. Complete a land-use study of the Oyster Point Marina area and provide City
Council with development options for consideration
. Work with City Council to move fOlWard with identified redevelopment
projects
· Encourage and support diversity in the workforce at all levels
-30-
CITY MANAGER
· Implement strategies to build on the strengths of the downtown area and
make it competitive with other retail centers
· Educate all employees about the 3 to 5-year financial forecast
I=IESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-31-
CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (05 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 594,011 527,665 527,666 574,883 47,218 8.9%
Materials & Services 104,712 107,775 108,230 113,732 5,957 5.5%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 698,723 635,440 635,896 688,615 53,175 8.4%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
3.70
3.70
Total
3.70
3.70
-32-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
CITY TREASURER
Citizens of South San Francisco
J
/ '\
05/06 06/07
City Treasurer 1.00 1.00
(Elected)
-33-
CITY TREASURER DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (03 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 29,032 34,174 34,174 35,548 1,374 4.0%
Materials & Services 13,059 3,086 3,086 3,151 65 2.1%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 42,091 37,260 37,260 38,699 1 ,439 3.9%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Part-Time
City Treasurer
1.00
1.00
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No service level changes are proposed.
-34-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Director of Finance 1.00 1.00
\.
ADMINISTRATION/BUDGET
05/06 06/07
Full-Time 2.00 2.00
ACCOUNTING
05/06 06/07
Full-Time 8.90 8.90
Note - 1 Financial Analyst position is charged to the Redevelopment
Agency, and 0.1 Senior Accountant position is charged to other funds.
These positions are included in the Redevelopment Agency and other
funds' budgets, and are not included in the above numbers.
-35-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Department
MISSION
to provide financial services to all the departments of the City.
To provide fiscal accountability and adequate control over the use of City funds
and appropriations.
To assure collection of funds due the City from such sources as Transient
Occupancy Taxes and Business Licenses.
To provide financial planning and reporting services for a more informed
budgeting process.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Finalized financial plans for Redevelopment Agency Bond sale, presented
finances to rating agencies, and sold Redevelopment Bonds to assist Agency
undertake major capital improvement efforts.
Updated a ten-year financial forecast and presented possible solutions to the
City's long-term budget challenges.
Took over liability claims processing from the City Attorney's Office, and initiated
regular reporting back to departments on liability trends in their areas. Convened
a quarterly risk management oversight committee of City departments.
Worked closely with Engineering and Public Works staff to monitor Wet Weather
capital improvement program in order to keep program within Council approved
rate program.
Worked with Human Resources Department to provide each employee with a
detailed salary and benefit statement, to facilitate better understanding of
employee costs.
Finance Director appointed to Employee Relations Policy Committee of the
League of California Cities.
OBJECTIVES
Continue to monitor the financial health of the Sewer Fund as it undertakes the
multi-year Wet Weather program.
-36-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Assist Redevelopment Agency with financing major land acquisitions, and
clarify/simplify financial reporting to the Agency.
Work with Information Technology, Human Resources, and user departments to
select and implement a modern financial system to better meet the City's
information needs.
Report on the scope of post-retiree health benefits to the City Council.
Implement required infrastructure-reporting requirement in financial statements.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-37-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (06 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 1,251,674 1,300,989 1,300,989 1,354,620 53,631 4.1%
Materials & Services 309,864 291,933 301,483 284,543 (7,390) -2.5%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,561,538 1,592,922 1,602,472 1,639,163 46,241 2.9%
Total General Fund Budget
1,639,163
Business Ucense Database
Fee Revenue
35,000
Net General Fund Contribution
1,604,163
-38-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRA TION/BUDGET AND RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION
. The Administration Division is comprised of the Director, Administrative Assistant, and two
Financial Analysts. The purpose of this Division is to oversee the department, prepare the annual
budget, monitor revenues, prepare financial projections, support the City Treasurer in investment
oversight, administer the City's risk management program, and manage the financial and debt
planning functions.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Admin/Budget/Risk Mgmt Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget ( 61 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budqet Chanqe
Salaries & Benefits 412,731 421,993 421,993 450,206 28,213 6,7%
Materials & Services 9,581 14,136 23,686 14,247 111 0.8%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 422,312 436,129 445,679 464,453 28,324 6,5%
Positions Budget
Amended
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
3.00
3.00
Total
3.00
3.00
After 2005-06, one Financial Analyst position is fully charged to the RDA.
-39-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES
The Accounting Division is comprised of the Assistant Director, two Accountants, a Financial
Services/Payroll Manager, four Accounting Assistants, and a Mail Courier. The purpose of the
Division is to keep the City's books in compliance with accounting standards, provide access to
accounting reports for departments, prepare annual financial reports and other mandated reports,
account for payroll costs and issue payroll checks and reports, issue vendor checks, manage the
City's legacy financial system through a contract with the host agency, the City of Redwood City, pay
debt service, project cash flow for the City Treasurer, monitor the City's fixed assets, and monitor
revenue and expenditures for the city's capital improvement program.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Accounting Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (62) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 838,943 878,996 878,996 904,414 25,418 2.9%
Materials & Services 300,283 277,797 277,797 270,296 (7,501) -2,7%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,139,226 1,156,793 1,156,793 1,174,710 17,917 1,5%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
8,90
8,90
Total
8,90
8.90
10% of the Accountant position is charged to other funds,
-40-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
r
5/06 06/07
Director 1.00 1.00
~
/ '\
05/06 06/07
Full-Time 3.00 3.00
Part- Time .81 .81
,
-41-
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Human Resources Department
MISSION
10 anticipate and respond to the diverse needs of employees, their families,
other City departments, and the public by providing quality customer-oriented
services and resources; to assist City staff in accomplishing their goals and
objectives in a safe, professional, efficient, organized, creative, and cooperative
manner; to establish and maintain professional, progressive, equitable, and
consistent personnel practices and procedures in accordance with federal, state,
local, and City rules, regulations, procedures, and requirements; to attract, retain,
promote, and recognize qualified and competent persons based on merit and
fitness.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Employee Relations: Completed salary surveys for AFSCME, Confidential,
Police, Operating Engineers, Mid Management, and Executive Management.
Customer Service: Expanded the Customer Service Recognition Program,
resulting in additional awards this year. Organized the Annual Employee
Recognition Awards Luncheon and distributed the zero sick leave appreciation
awards.
Training and Employee Development: Completed and sponsored the joint
agency Liebert Cassidy workshop seminars with over 25 City participants and
over 60 other cities participants; conducted three Brown Bags for all employees
on a variety of topics; coordinated the mandatory Sexual Harassment training
programs to all employees and expanded on-line training program for new hires;
conducted various training for mid management employees for personal
development and business fundamentals; launched the succession planning
program for executive management for developing a pool of leaders who can
meet the organization's current and future needs.
Recruitment and Examination: Made approximately 27 recruitments of new
employees while conducting a variety of recruitments and continued to modify
our program for those hard-to-fill positions; continued with a leadership role in
the San Mateo County Communications Dispatcher Testing Consortium,
resulting in cost savings. Joined CalOpps organization with 30 other public
agencies and participating in advertising employment opportunities which
created a dynamic and user-friendly website.
Classification and Compensation: Reviewed 8 applications for reclassification
studies.
-42-
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
Data Management: Develop and implement an employee database with direct
link or downloading capabilities from the payroll system as part of the new
integrated Finance / HR software system. Maintain and enhance HR's newest
interactive website which includes setting up on-line applications, salary survey
information, and other HR-related vital information.
Recruitment and Examination: Continue to improve, refine, and streamline
recruitment and exam processes; reduce recruitment time from recruitment
closing to final eligible employment list provided by at least an additional 5%.
Occupational Health and Safety: Develop and implement an employee wellness
program.
Communication: Develop and continue to implement a comprehensive Intranet
web page that can be used by all City employees for a variety of HR-related
information; finalize the update and reissue the Administration Instruction
manual.
Employee Relations: Begin and finalize negotiations with all bargaining units.
Customer Service: Develop and implement new employee orientation program.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-43-
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (09 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 513,490 590,896 590,896 625,542 34,646 5.9%
Materials & Services 216,482 293,978 334,201 296,647 2,669 0.9%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 729,972 884,874 925,097 922,189 37,315 4.2%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 4.00 4.00
Part-Time 0.81 0.81
Total 4.81 4.81
-44-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Director 1.00 1.00
05/06 06/07
Full- Time 5.00 5.00
-45-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Information Technology Department
MISSION
To design, implement, and maintain the citywide information technology network;
to set standards for all user hardware to assure system compatibility; to support
user hardware and assist with the training of employees in the use of various
common software; to assist departments in planning for their particular unique
technology needs.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1. McAfee Enterprise virus protection process
Created a faster and better method to protect our computers from viruses.
2. Create a VPN (Virtual Private Network)
To allow employees and Council to access the City network from home.
3. Hillsborough I.T. Services Contract
Contracted with the Town of Hillsborough to provide first, second and third
line support for the town's workstations, servers, telecom, documentation,
management and strategic planning.
4. Fire Station 61 Project (new)
Managed the technology side of the project for the new fire station.
Moved three Divisions into the new facility.
5. Water Quality Control Plant on the Fiber Ring
Expansion of the fiber ring network to the Water Quality Control Plant is
expected to be complete this year. This will allow faster backup and daily
connections. A joint project with Public Works to lay conduit in the sewer
expansion project allowed a cheaper cost to connect.
6. Cell Tower contracts
Worked with various cell/wireless companies to identify, negotiate and
sign contracts for the City.
7. Disaster Recovery plan
Expanded the current disaster recovery plan for the City's Information
Technology infrastructure.
-46-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
1. Select Software Vendor
Assist Finance / Human Resources Departments in selecting a software
vendor or vendors for an integrated Finance / Human Resources Data
Base, lead contract negotiations with venders, and oversee project
implementation.
2. GIS (Geographical Information System)
Create a plan for deployment and educate staff on usage of the tools.
3. LaserFiche
Provide leadership, maintenance and structure for the existing
departments. Bring one additional department online. (Pending Funding)
4. External Services
Continue to provide service to external clients e.g., the Airport Noise
Abatement Project, the Water Quality Control Plant, and the Town of
Hillsborough, and investigate potential new client opportunities to support
revenue enhancement.
5. Disaster Recovery
Expand the current disaster recovery plan for the City's Information
Technology infrastructure.
6. Strategic Plan
Update the current Information Technology Strategic plan.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-47-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds:
Charges to Departments: 1,262,576
Charges to Other Agencies: 24,000
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (16) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 712,440 790,673 734,673 825,531 34,858 4.4%
Materials & Services 554,618 444,143 529,167 461,045 16,902 3,8%
Capital Outlay
Total 1,267,058 1,234,816 1,263,840 1,286,576 51,760 4,2%
-48-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: City Services Fund
Change
Info Technology Services Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget ( 161 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 712,440 790,673 734,673 825,531 34,858 4.4%
Materials & Services 514,206 400,119 485,143 417,021 16,902 4.2%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,226,646 1,190,792 1,219,816 1,242,552 51,760 4.3%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 6.00 6,00
Part-Time
Total 6.00 6.00
-49-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
-50-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
-51-
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
,Non - Departmental
MISSION
To meet City requirements that are not related to a particular Department.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (071,213) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits * 3,866 4,466 4,466 4,501 35 0.8%
Materials & Services 782,880 883,971 883,971 859,514 (24,457) -2.8%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 786,746 888,437 888,437 864,015 (24,422) -2,7%
* Housing Authority
-52-
NON-DEPARTMENTAL, 2006-07
Non - Departmental, 2006-07
Adopted Proposed
Account # ORGANIZATION/PROGRAM SUPPORTED 2005-06 2006-07
4210 Anir:nal Control 425,500 432,900
4220 Professional Tech. Services - Gov't
. C/CAG 50,000 52,500
. C/CAG Conaestion Relief Plan 150,000 150,000
4301 Office Supplies 3,000 3,000
. Newsletter 24,430 24,430
. Printinq 12,000 12,000
. Business Cards 2,000 . 2,000
I
4307 Postaae 19,250 I 20,213
4310 Dues, Meetings, Mileage
. Peninsula Conflict 13,300 13,965
. Leaque of CA Cities 17,800 18,690
. ABAG 9,500 9,689
. Airport Community Round Table 1,240 1,302
. Chamber of Commerce 880 924
. SAMCEDA 10,300 10,300
. Peninsula T.V. 41,000 43,050
. SAMCAT (Cable TV oversiqht) 2,625 2,756
. Peninsula Policy Partnership 13,075 -
. LAFCO 7,420 I 7,791
4365 Maintenance/Operating Equipment
. Phones/Computers for Council Chambers 5,000 5,000
. Non-DeDartmental Eauipment 1,000 1,000
4380 Promotional - TOT Allocation
. Chamber of Commerce 55,000 25,000
. Plvmire-Schwarz Museum and Fire Museum 5,000 5,000
4399 Misc. I 6,700 10,000
4410 Phone Service 7,951 I 8,004
I
21310 Housina Authority 4,466 4,501
Total 888,437 864,015
-53-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Assistant City
Manager .60 .60
I' "- r ,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full- Time .15 .15 Full-Time .30 .30
./
PLANNING BUILDING
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 6.00 6.00 Full-Time 9.80 9.80
""I r '\
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY PARKING DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full- Time 2.97 2.75 Full- Time. 2.00 2.00
/ '\ r ,
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ENGINEERING
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
EC&D Staff 1.93 3.35 Full-Time 6.38 6.18
./
Other City Staff 6.90 6.90
" ~
-55-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Economic and Community Development Department
MISSION
The Economic and Community Development Department's miSSion is the
preservation and improvement of the physical and economic condition of the
South San Francisco Community. The department provides the administrative
over-sight that contributes to the successful completion of the goals, objectives
and daily operation of the Divisions of Economic Development, Redevelopment,
Planning, Housing and Community Development, Building, Engineering and
Parking District. Each Division provides high-quality municipal services to all
residents, businesses and industry and promotes safe living and working
environments to maintain standards and enhance the quality of life for the
community.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Redevelopment:
. Completed Fiscal Merger and assisted Finance Department in issuing
bonds.
. Executed billboard sign relocation agreement, closed escrow, completed
toxics abatement and demolition of existing structures at 178-179 Airport
Boulevard.
Building:
. Performed 95% of all requested inspections with-in 24 hours of request.
. Completed a Policy and Procedure Manual for the Division.
. Started scanning old history records into the Permit Tracking System
CRW.
Housing and Community Development:
. Executed Affordable Housing Agreements with three projects:
Habitat for Humanity, 111 Chestnut Avenue and Bridge Housing.
. Recruited/hired permanent CDBG Coordinator.
. Administered the CDBG Program and received a letter of
commendation from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development for surpassing all management and performance
goals particularly in the creation of affordable housing
opportunities.
. Completed major rehabilitation phase on 310 and 312 Miller Avenue to be
managed as affordable housing units.
. Abated illegal units at 380 Alta Vista property for addition to UM housing
inventory.
. Completed major exterior renovations of 24 units at Willow Gardens.
· Acquired additional four-plex on Susie Way.
. Acquired three-unit residential property at 714 Linden Avenue.
. Began site soils work for residential development by BRIDGE Housing for
County owned site at Oak and Grand Avenues.
-56-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering:
· Completed Oyster Point Flyover and Hook Ramps.
· Completed design of Fire Station 61 and initiated construction bidding.
· Initiated selection of Design Architect and Construction Manager for new
Community Center at Orange Park.
· Obtained grant funding for Linear Park and initiated design.
· Obtained grant funding for pedestrian/bicycle crossing and new
pedestrian timed signal heads.
· Completed 80% construction for Wet Weather Phase I.
· Completed design for Lindenville storm drain and pump station.
· Completed design of sanitary pump station number 3 and number 4,
forced mains and solicited construction bids.
Planning:
· The City approved a Transit Oriented Development at the BART station
including 360 new dwelling units, 72 of which are Below Market Rate, and
including 23,000 square feet of retail space, 12,000 square feet of which
is a new Trader Joe's grocery.
· Processed entitlements for 40 new residential units and approximately
576,000 square feet of Research and Development, and 47,000 square
feet of commercial space.
· Amended Inclusionary Housing Agreement.
Parking District:
· Acquired 178-190 Airport Boulevard and annexed the site into the Parking
District for an additional 40+ space parking lot.
· Added parking meters on Spruce Avenue between Grand and Baden
Avenues.
· Completed approximately 95% of Electronic meter conversion.
· Modified meter-rate structure.
OBJECTIVES
Redevelopment:
· Implementation of property acquisition and improvements as specified in
the Redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan for all four
redevelopment project areas.
Building:
· Continue training of field inspectors on the use of the CRW permit system
for counter assignment.
· Work with Fire Prevention to streamline the plan review process.
· Improve field inspections with wireless connection to the permit system.
· Increase in-house plan checking to 30%.
Housing and Community Development:
· Creation of affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate-
income families by leveraging financing and sponsoring the
development of new residential units; and continued management
of the City's First Time Home Buyer Program.
-57-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
. Administration of CDBG program, fiscal reporting requirements and
sub-recipient grant agreements.
. Continue property management of fifteen residential units.
. Continue administration of housing rehabilitation programs.
. Continue construction for Agency sponsored new residential development
of 43 affordable units on the County owned site located at Oak and Grand
Avenues.
. Initiate construction for the four units of affordable housing to be
developed by Habitat for Humanity at 440 Commercial Avenue.
. Complete renovation of residential unit at 380 Alta Vista.
Engineering:
. Implementation/management of the miscellaneous CIP projects and
budgets.
. Implementation of the Wet Weather program (completion of phases 1
through 5).
. Soliciting bids for Construction of the new Community Center.
. Complete construction of Fire Station 61.
. Initiate construction of Linear Park on BART right-of-way.
Planning:
. Process the Genentech Master Plan update.
. Update the Zoning Code and implement zoning consistency.
. Update the East of 101 Transportation Fee.
. Continue to develop the Division's web presence and to make available
on web all Division documents, which are public information.
. Continue monitoring housing production consistent with ABAG
projections, and manage Daycare and inclusionary housing ordinances.
Parking District:
· Complete electronic meter conversion
· Construct parking lot at 178-190 Airport Boulevard
. Complete Permit parking lot survey. And prepare annual revenue rate
adjustment report
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
The Redevelopment Agency operating budget reflects the restoration of a
previously frozen Sr. Engineer position to support development review services
and the capital improvement program. With the 2006 Redevelopment Bond
sale, funding is available to move forward with two Agency land acquisitions and
other important redevelopment priorities.
-58-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds:
General Fund
CDBG Fund
Parking Fund
3,375,585
731,887
355,369
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed
Budget ( 10) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Salaries & Benefits 2,565,217 2,725,003 2,725,003 2,915,442
Materials & Services 1,789,660 1,542,402 1,640,642 1,512,399
Capital Outlay 602,171 300,000
Debt Service & Other 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Total 4,992,048 4,302,405 4,700,645 4,462,841
Total General Fund Budget 3,375,585
Planning Fees 175,000
Building and Grading Fees 2,375,000
Other Fees 50,700
Total Fee Revenue 2,600,700
Net General Fund Contribution 774,885
Redevelopment Activities and
Caoitallmorovements* 31,305,548
Change
From
Adopted
BUdget
190,439
(30,003)
%
Change
7.0%
-1.9%
. Redevelopment Funds are listed in the "Other Funds' section of the budget document
and are not included in the Total Department budget here and on the next few pages.
-59-
160,436
3.7%
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION
The Economic and Community Development Department provides the administrative over-sight
that contributes to the successful completion of the goals, objectives and daily operation of the
following Divisions; Economic Development, Redevelopment Agency, Housing and Community
Development, Planning, Building, Engineering and the Parking District.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Administration Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (101 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 151,526 164,968 164,968 178,907 13,939 8.4%
Materials & Services 35,633 85,044 85,044 92,026 6,982 8.2%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 187,159 250,012 250,012 270,933 20,921 8.4%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
0.90
0.90
Total
0.90
0.90
-60-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Economic Development Division provides the support and resources necessary to promote
and maintain quality development within the City and improves the processing and regulatory
functions necessary to assure continued growth and development with in the City.
Economic Development
Budget (102)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
16,706 20,022 20,022 21,397 1,375 6.9%
13,425 22,098 22,098 21,175 (923) -4.2%
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
30,131
42,120
42,120
42,572
452
1.1%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
0.15
0.15
Total
0.15
0.15
-61-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
The major functions of the Housing and Community Development Division are; administering the
CDSG program including fiscal reporting requirements, administering residential revitalization and
social service grants, managing the First Time Homebuyers Program, creating affordable housing
opportunities for low and moderate income families, and implementing the Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance. The Division consists of the Director, Administrative Assistant, Office Specialist and two
consultants.
Source of Funds: CDBG Fund
Change
Housing & Community Dev. Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (103) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 193,955 309,507 309,507 328,894 19,387 6.3%
Materials & Services 327,590 455,370 480,060 367,993 (87,377) -19.2%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Total 556,545 799,877 824,567 731,887 (67,990) -8.5%
Positions Budget
Adopted Proposed
2005-06 2006-07
Change
Full-Time
2.97 2.75
(0.22)
Total
2.97 2.75
(0.22)
-62-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
The Planning Division is responsible for administration and implementation of the South San
Francisco General Plan and Zoning Code. The Division also provides primary staff support for
the Planning Commission, Parking Place Commission, and Design Review Board. The Division
processes over 400 applications or plan reviews per year, ranging from small residential room
additions to major biotech developments involving hundreds of thousands of square feet of new
buildings.
Source of Funds:
General Fund
Change
Planning Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (104) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 714,906 730,834 730,834 774,167 43,333 5.9%
Materials & Services 512,191 281 ,266 350,859 279,683 (1,583) -0.6%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,227,097 1,012,100 1,081,693 1,053,850 41,750 4.1%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
6.00
6.00
Total
6.00
6.00
-63-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING
The Building Division is responsible for enforcing the State Building Codes. This is accomplished
by providing plan review, field inspections and issuing Certificates of Occupancy. Our inspectors
are responsible for ensuring the elements of a structure meet or exceed the minimum requirements
for health and life safety of the occupants and the structure. Our permit counter is open during all
hours of operation to issue construction permits, provide over the counter plan review, answer
questions and offer guidance to the customer. We also maintain the history of permitted
construction activities for the City.
Source of Funds:
General Fund
Change
Building Inspection Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 105 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 941,854 1,085,969 1,085,969 1,180,063 94,094 8.7%
Materials & Services 516,072 328,003 328,700 342,527 14,524 4.4%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,457,926 1,413,972 1,414,669 1,522,590 108,618 7.7%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
9.80
9.80
Total
9.80
9.80
-64-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PARKING
The Parking District manages and maintains all public parking in the Downtown Area by servicing electronic
meters, monitoring parking lot usage, providing parking surveys, and addressing any concerns or suggestions
by the downtown merchants and general public. It is funded from parking meter and parking permit fees.
Source of Funds: Parking District Fund
Change
Parking Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 106 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
BudQet ChanQe
Salaries & Benefits 100,960 175,513 175,513 182,137 6,624 3.8%
Materials & Services 128,129 122,717 122,717 173,232 50,515 41.2%
Capital Outlay 602,171 300,000
Debt Service & Other
Total 831,260 298,230 598,230 355,369 57,139 19.2%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
2.00
2.00
-65-
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
The' major functions of the Engineering Division are to administer the City's Capital Improvement
Program, manage major projects such as the Wet Weather Program, Oyster Point Hook Ramps,
New Fire Station 61 and the New South San Francisco Community Center, function as the City's
Traffic Engineer, lead the Traffic Advisory Committee, lead the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory
Committee, apply for various Federal and State funds for public improvements and public facilities
improvements, provide assistance to other City departments, administer and issue all types of
permits on any public works projects and work within the public right-of-way, provide the public
with information regarding property and engineering matters, and review information pertaining to
all developments within the City.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Engineering Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 131, 132 in GF) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change.
Salaries & Benefits 445,310 238,190 238,190 249,877 11,687 4.9%
Materials & Services 256,620 247,904 251,164 235,763 (12,141) -4.9%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 701,930 486,094 489,354 485,640 (454) -0.1%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time Charged to General Fund 2.90 2.90
Full-Time Charged to Other Funds 3.48 3.28 (0.20)
Total 6.38 6.18 (0.20)
-66-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
FIRE DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00
r f ""'\
ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 2.00 2.00 Full-Time 40.00 40.00
Part-Time 0.48 0.48
'- ./
PREVENTION EMERGENCY MEDICAL
05/06 06/07 SERVICES 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 2.00 2.00 Full-Time 31.00 31.00
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
Note - 2 Safety Inspector positions are charged to the Redevelopment Agency.
These positions are reflected in the Redevelopment Agency budget and are not
included in the above numbers.
-67-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Department
MISSION
To protect the people, environment, property and quality of neighborhoods within
the City of South San Francisco from the effects of fires, natural and man-made
disasters, hazardous material incidents, medical emergencies, hazards created
by substandard construction or violations of the municipal code.
This will be accomplished through strategic planning and management, prompt
and efficient response of emergency personnel and equipment, creation of inter-
agency agreements with neighboring public and private emergency service
providers for our mutual benefit, comprehensive public education, fire and
Municipal Code enforcement.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Occupied the new Fire Administration/Fire Station 61 Complex located at 480
North Canal. Now all the administrative functions of the Department are at the
same location.
Placed into service a thermal imaging camera that helps to "see" through smoke
at the scene of a fire and locate victims, replaced aging structural firefighting
clothing worn by firefighters to protect them from heat or physical injury, replaced
aging portable and vehicle radios used to communicate at the scene of an
emergency with a $289,736 grant from the FEMA Assistance to Firefighters
Grant.
Replaced aging wildland fire clothing, web gear, helmets that are worn by
firefighters to protect them from heat or physical injury, and non-compliant
emergency fire shelters with another $88,532 grant from the FEMA Assistance to
Firefighters Grant Program.
A new EMS record management and ambul.ance billing system was purchased
and implemented. This new system will allow the Fire Department to comply
with the requirements to use the National Emergency Medical Incident Reporting
System (NEMIRS) for data collection, evaluation and reporting to state and
federal agencies.
The Department in cooperation with California Task Force-3 and the National
Search Dog Foundation operate a Canine Urban Search and Rescue program.
One of the Department's personnel and their specially trained dog has achieved
FEMA Level 1 certification and is now ready to search for victims trapped in the
rubble of collapsed buildings.
-68-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The Department entered into preferred provider agreements with American
Medical Response and PHI Mercy Air Ambulance for non-emergency ambulance
transportation services. These agreements generated in excess of $200,000 in
revenue for the BLS Ambulance Program.
In cooperation with the Parks and Recreation Department, a Junior Fire
Academy was offered to children ages 9 to 11.
The Department entered into a memorandum of understanding with San Mateo
Emergency Services Providers Group to share radio frequencies in North San
Mateo County. This will significantly improve the sending and receiving of radio
communications at no cost to the City of South San Francisco.
The Department had representation (personnel) on the following San Mateo
County Committees: Fire Chiefs, Fire Operations, Fire Training, Emergency
Services Council, County Emergency Medical Care Committee, and Medical
Advisory Committee
OBJECTIVES
Minimize operating costs where feasible; develop better cost recovery for
services the Fire Department provides to the community and businesses andlor
to increase revenues where possible (ALS and BLS ambulance programs, fire
prevention plan check fees, renewable permits, special activity permits and the
offering of specialized training).
Continue the implementation of an integrated BLS ambulance dispatch,
electronic patient care reporting and patient billing records management system
that contributes to the efficient entry of important patient care and billing
information, regulatory compliance and enhanced cost recovery.
Continue the implementation of an integrated electronic fire prevention, fire
inspection and code enforcement records management system that can be used
by safety inspectors and engine company personnel that contributes to the
efficient entry of important building, inspection, hazard and billing information,
regulatory compliance and enhanced cost recovery.
Implement a community emergency response program throughout the City that
trains citizens and businesses to put out small fires, search for and rescue
victims safely, treat the sick and injured, organize themselves and spontaneous
volunteers to be effective, and collect disaster intelligence to support the Fire,
Police and Public Works Department efforts.
-69-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-70-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
General Fund: 12,645,060
Fee Revenues: 2,230,000
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 11,306,906 12,044,727 12,044,727 12,880,311 835,584 6.9%
Materials & Services 2,585,424 1,848,357 1,813,834 1,875,937 27,580 1.5%
Capital Outlay 9,526 376,657 488,820 (376,657)
Debt Service & Other 2,517 56,521 56,521 118,812 62,291
Total 13,904,373 14,326,262 14,403,902 14,875,060 548,798 3.8%
Total General Fund Budget
14,875,060
Paramedic and Non-emergency
1,152,500
Non-emergency Transport Fees (BLS)
425,000
Fire Permit, Inspection,
and Prevention Fees
650,000
All Other
2,500
Total Fee Revenue
2,230,000
Net General Fund Contribution *
12,645,060
* Includes Measure I Special Tax
125,556
-71-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION
The Administration Division is responsible for providing the vision, direction and control of the City's
fire prevention, operations, emergency medical services, code enforcement and disaster
preparedness programs through the use of strategic planning, resource identification and allocation,
financial management, introduction of new technologies and cost recovery when appropriate.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Administration Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (111) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 571,763 544,140 544,140 600,123 55,983 10.3%
Materials & Services 271,661 310,960 373,237 378,891 67,931 21.8%
Capital Outlay 6,443
Debt Service & Other
Total 843,424 855,100 923,820 979,014 123,914 14.5%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full.Time
3.00
3.00
Total
3.00
3.00
-72-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONS
the Operations Division is responsible for the prompt and efficient response of personnel and
equipment to the scene of an emergency. These emergencies include fires, hazardous materials
incidents, caring for and transporting the sick or injured, natural and manmade disasters as well as
incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. This is accomplished by a network of five fire
stations strategically located within the community to minimize response times to the emergency
scene once the call for assistance has been received. Each fire station has at least one fire engine
staffed by three firefighting personnel. Two of the fire engines also have a permanently fixed aerial
ladder that can reach heights up to 75 feet to assist in the rescue of occupants trapped on the
upper floors of a building. Two of the fire stations house fire rescue ambulances that are staffed by
two firefighter/paramedics.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Operations Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (117) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 6,263,063 6,887,736 6,887,736 7,357,576 469,840 6.8%
Materials & Services 1,519,903 586,196 554,421 563,433 (22,763) -3.9%
Capital Outlay 376,657 424,983 (376,657)
Debt Service & Other 7,722 7,722 7,769 47
Total 7,782,966 7,858,311 7,874,862 7,928,778 70,467 0.9%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 40.00 40.00
Part-Time 0.48 0.48
Total 40.48 40.48
As of the 2005-06 budget, the Management Analyst position has been frozen.
-73-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
The Emergency Medical Services Division is responsible for the Department's injury and illness
prevention programs as well as caring for the sick and injured. This is accomplished by offering
first-aid, CPR, child-car safety seat inspections and senior fall prevention classes to the community
and businesses. When a medical emergency occurs, a fire engine and fire/rescue ambulance is
ready to respond to assess, treat and then transport the victim to the hospital.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Fee Revenue: 1,577,500
Change
Emergency Medical Services Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget (116) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 3,991,114 4,342,906 4,342,906 4,630,671 287,765 6.6%
Materials & Services 422,603 511,745 458,605 465,977 (45,768) -8.9%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other 2,517 48.799 48.799 111,043 62.244
Total 4.416,234 4,903.450 4,850,310 5,207,691 304,241 6.2%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
31.00
31.00
Total
31.00
31.00
-74-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
The Disaster Preparedness Division is responsible for coordinating citizens, businesses and the
City's efforts to prepare and respond to either manmade or natural disasters. This is
accomplished by the creation and support of community emergency response teams, providing
advanced training in disaster response and management, participation in County-wide disaster
simulations or exercises and the writing of disaster mitigation plans.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Disaster Preparedness Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget (113) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services 68,332 73,408 73,408 100,641 27,233 37.1%
Capital Outlay 9,526
Debt Service & Other
Total 77 ,858 73,408 73,408 100,641 27,233 37.1%
-75-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE PREVENTION
The Fire Prevention Division is responsible for the prevention of fires, hazardous materials
incidents or other situations that threaten health, the environment or property. In addition, this
Division enforces the City's Municipal Code. This is accomplished by public safety announcements
regarding smoke detectors, fire safety demonstrations at local schools or fairs, adoption of local
amendments to the Uniform Fire Code, construction plan checking, site inspections and
investigation of Municipal Code violations.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Fee Revenue: 650,000
Change
Fire Prevention Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget (112) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 480,966 269,945 269,945 291,941 21,996 8.1%
Materials & Services 302,925 366,048 354,163 366,995 947 0.3%
Capital Outlay 57,394
Debt Service & Other
Total 783,891 635,993 681,502 658,936 22,943 3.6%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
2.00
2.00
Total
2.00
2.00
After 2005-06, two Safety Inspectors have been charged to RDA.
-76-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Director 1.00 1.00
/ " / "'\
ADMINISTRATIVE MAIN LIBRARY
& TECHNICAL
SERVICES 05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 4.11 4.11 Full- Time 7.72 7.72
Part-Time 2.53 2.53 Part-Time 8.33 8.33
'- ./ "- ~
( GRAND A VENUE LIBRARY "'\ f "'\
LITERACY DIVISION
5/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 3.17 3.17 Full-Time 6.40 6.40
Part-Time 1.35 1.35 Part-Time 3.93 3.93
\..... ./ '- ~
Note - 0.6 Community Learning Center positions are charged to the Redevelopment
Agency and are reflected in the Redevelopment Agency budget. These positions are
not included in the above numbers.
-77-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
Library Department
MISSION
South San Francisco Public Library is actively committed to providing access to
the best possible combination of library materials and services to meet the
informational, educational and recreational needs of our multicultural community,
in a professional manner, with a human touch.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Increased marketing and awareness of library services in the community
through: Farmers Market, Day in the Park, the Senior Health Fair, the school
district's Kindergarten Roundup, and other local events.
Implemented a new online catalog system, PLS+, which provides a more user
friendly environment for online browsing and reserving of materials.
Popular author, Lemony Snicket (Daniel Handler), made a rare appearance in
South San Francisco. The scarcity of his public appearances made this event a
coup, not just for the Library, but for our city as well. 450 people attended this
free event and book signing.
Increased participation in library programs through Learning Wheels, Teen and
Children's Summer Reading Programs, weekly story time sessions, and
seasonal programming for adults and children by 14%. Delivered items to
patrons unable to come to our libraries because of physical and health
limitations, and established a monthly poetry reading program in one of the city's
adult residential facilities.
Increased accessibility of the Main Library by installing a ramp and automatic
doors at the front entrance, altering the elevator to allow use by patrons in
wheelchairs, and reconfiguring the Children's Room and patron lounge for easier
accessibility and increased appeal. Improved the Library environment by
installing graphic signs to make browsing easier and adding a "coffee bar" to the
facility.
Offered new programs and collections to meet the needs of the diverse
community. New programs included a summer school program at CLC, Artists in
the Middle programming for middle school students, health and safety programs
for women and teens, and programs focusing on how to become a U.S. citizen.
In addition, library services supported the downtown business community
through a federal Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) Business in a Box
-78-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
grant project and our collection of Spanish materials and online databases were
expanded through additional grant opportunities.
Developed new partnerships with community groups to increase community
knowledge and use of the library. Project Read worked with Barnes and Noble
to deliver books to children. CLC worked with Skyline College on the "Gateway"
project as well as collaborating to have two America Counts students assist in
the Homework Club. Grand Avenue Library partnered with the San Mateo
County Health Department to offer Mom & Daughter Health Spas at the Library.
The Library received $411 ,300 in grants and donations to fund Community
Learning Center programs, Project Read's Learning Wheels van, a local
business initiative, Spanish-language materials to enhance the Grand Avenue
Library collection, children's summer reading programs, the Reader Leader
tutoring program and more.
Community volunteers, including two AmeriCorps volunteers, donated over
22,000 hours of service to Library programs.
OBJECTIVES
Overall Outcome: Broaden community knowledge and appreciation of library
services and programming through comprehensive outreach, marketing, and
improvements to the library environment and by continuing to build partnerships
with community groups.
1. New Main Library Development Plan. Initiate community outreach and needs
assessment process to develop a building plan for a new main library, which
will require state funding.
2. Technology. Upgrade and enhance at least three areas of technology to
enable patron's broader access to library services and resources.
3. Programming. Increase student support and lifelong learning opportunities
by identifying partners, ascertaining needs, and expanding programs.
4. Collections. Develop at least three areas of the collection to maintain
currency and meet the changing and diverse needs of the community.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed; however, the
elimination of the DVD rental fee in the Master Fee schedule, as recommended
by the Library Board, is proposed.
-79-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds: General Fund
General Fund: 3,633,041
Grants, Fees and Other Revenue: 569,500
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 3,064,823 3,037,293 3,037,293 3,161,624 124,331 4.1%
Materials & Services 1,349,003 936,429 939,624 1,040,917 104,488 11.2%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 4,413,826 3,973,722 3,976,917 4,202,541 228,819 5.8%
Total General Fund Budget
4,202,541
Library Fines
73,000
Grants
464,000
Community Development Block
Grant Transfers (SSF and DC)
32,500
Total Fees and Grants
569,500
Net General Fund Contribution *
3,633,041
* Includes Measure I Special Tax
125,556
-80-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION & TECHNICAL SERVICES
, Administers the City's Library services program and provides technical services support through
the selecting, ordering, cataloging and processing of a variety of materials for library facilities plus
the planning for and implementation of computer hardware and software in the library.
Additionally, this division handles public relations for the library and coordinates the use of library
volunteers.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Administration Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (151) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 789,601 740,141 740,141 774,983 34,842 4.7%
Materials & Services 319,629 262,356 262,356 274,435 12,079 4.6%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,109,230 1,002,497 1,002,497 1,049,418 46,921 4.7%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 5.11 5.11
Part-Time 2.53 2.53
Total 7.64 7.64
-81-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
MAIN LIBRARY
provide library and educational services and materials at the Main Library on West Orange Avenue,
including adult, young adult and children's materials, services and programs, audiovisual materials
and Circulation Services. Readers' and Information Services (Reference Services), provides
reference and Internet assistance and training. Children's Services provides weekly children's story
times, summer reading programs for children and teens and year-round special programming for
children, families and school classes.
Main Library
Budget (152)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
1,094,729 1,161,581 1,161,581 1,213,363 51,782 4.5%
522,215 406,486 406,486 473,247 66,761 16.4%
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
1,616,944
1,568,067 1,568,067 1,686,610
118,543
7.6%
Positions Budget Amended Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 7.72 7.72
Part-Time 8.33 8.33
Total 16.05 16.05
-82-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
GRAND AVENUE LIBRARY
Provide library and educational services and materials for the Grand Avenue Library including adult
and children's materials, services and programs, audiovisual materials, and circulation and
reference services. Branch services include a large Spanish-language collection for children and
adults as well as bilingual reference assistance and circulation services. The History Room is
located in Grand Avenue Library and is available by appointment.
Grand Avenue Division
Budget (153)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
348,843 368,709 368,709 382,327 13,618 3.7%
221,804 110,061 110,061 117,378 7,317 6.6%
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
570,647
478,770
478,770
499,705
20,935
4.4%
Positions Budget Amended Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 3.17 3.17
Part-Time 1.35 1.35
Total 4.52 4.52
-83-
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
LITERACY
F;'rovides library services to meet family, individual, work and civic literacy needs of our community.
Literacy services are a collaboration between City staff, local citizens local schools and non-profit
organizations to create a more literate and skilled citizenry and enable families to playa greater role
in their children's education. This Division is comprised of Project Read and the Community
Leaming Center.
Literacy Division
Budget (154)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
831,650 766,862 766,862 790,951 24,089 3.1%
285,355 157,526 160,721 175,857 18,331 11.6%
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
1,117,005
924,388
927,583
966,808
42,420
4.6%
Positions Budget Amended Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 6.40 6.40
Part-Time 3.93 3.93
Total 10.33 10.33
For the 2005-06 budget, 0.6 FTE of full-time staff is charged to RDA.
-84-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
POLICE DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Police Chief 1.00 1.00
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 1.00 1.00 Full-Time 8.00 8.00
/ '\ / ...."
INVESTIGATIONS PATROL
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 11.00 11.00 Full-Time 63.00 66.00
Part-Time 0.48 0.48 Part- Time 2.69 2.69
\. ./ " ~
/' ...."
RECORDS COMMUNICATIONS
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 8.00 8.00 Full-Time 11.80 12.20
Part-Time 0.48 0.48
\. .J
Note - 2 Police Officer positions are charged to the Redevelopment Agency for
Downtown patrol, and 1 Parking Enforcement Officer position is charged to the
Parking Fund. These positions are reflected in those budgets, and are not
included in the above numbers.
-85-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Police Department
MISSION
Provide for the protection of life, property and the promotion of peace and order
in the community through the enforcement of applicable laws and the facilitation
of proactive community involvement.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Despite the continuing budget restraints and freezing of permanent positions
within the department, the Police Department was able to maintain and continue
all of the more than 40 programs and services we provide to the community.
Some highlights are:
· 84 Juveniles participated in our Neighborhood Enhancement Action Team
(N.E.A.T.) Program, an alternative to legal action for minor violations of
the law.
· $29,167 raised in donations to sustain our Summer Youth Work program
and Scholarship fund.
· Continued the Citizens academy, both in English and Spanish with a total
of 104 graduates.
· $19,032 in donations and grants obtained for the first ever in South San
Francisco program called 'Every 15 minutes' to educate high school age
students about the dangers of drinking and driving.
The Police Department continued to become familiar with and fully utilize the
new RIMS Records Management System (RMS) and Computer Aided Dispatch
System (CAD) through out the department. This has allowed the department to
become virtually paperless in the area of writing and storing reports.
Purchased digital cameras for all officers so all photos of crime and accident
scenes can be stored with the report in the new RIMS report writing system.
This saves considerable amount of money on film and developing costs.
As a result of new technology in the RMS, scanned reports dating back to 1993
into the system that is saving on valuable space as well as making retrieval of
information much easier. :
Initiated first on-line reporting system in September of 2005 successfully and will
be expanding this service to give the citizens other options in making police
reports to the department.
-86-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Successfully completed the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant that gave the
City speed radar signs and concentrated on pedestrian and bicycle safety. The
equipment now belongs to the City and can be moved and utilized through the
City as the needs arise.
Established a gang suppression unit (GSU) that is deployed on weekends to
concentrate on gang related activities and individuals.
Played a major role in the organization and participation in County Wide Gang
Task Force that was operational full time for 8 weeks in the fall and then for a
week once a month since then. This was a collaborative effort involving all San
Mateo County Police agencies, the Sheriff's Department, Probation and State
Parole where an average of 25 law enforcement personnel were assigned
throughout the county focused on gang enforcement.
OBJECTIVES
Continue to implement and support the Back to Basics strategy that focuses on
key department programs by requiring regular reports to the Administration. This
will meet the goal of the program in assuring that all personnel know what is
expected of them as their basic job and that appropriate accountability for
performance is in place throughout the Department. To further enhance this
accountability, the Police Department adopted a 'Standard Expectations'
document to measure proactive productivity for officers.
With the approval to rehire three frozen Police Officer positions, reinstate the
second School Liaison Officer Position to address the needs in the grammar
schools.
Institute a new program in the schools called Gang Resistance Education and
Training (G.R.E.A.T.) to replace the DARE program with the emphasis on gang
recognition and prevention, starting in the grammar schools.
Continue participation in the County Wide Gang Task Force.
Continue with the downtown bicycle and S.E.T. programs to help keep the recent
upsurge of gang related activities under control with our no tolerance policy.
Continue to assign personnel to all three San Mateo County Regional Task
Forces during the year: the REACT Computer Task Force, the County Narcotics
Task Force and the Vehicle Theft Task Force. Participation in these task forces
an important component of our budget since the costs of almost three officer
positions are reimbursed to the department.
-87-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
By mid-budget year, restore two of the four motorcycle positions back to their
own unit and not be part of the patrol teams (which was done to meet minimum
staffing need and save on overtime) that will enable the department to more
clearly focus on traffic issues and be able to schedule officers to meet the
growing traffic concerns.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
The proposed budget includes funds to rehire three frozen Police Officer
positions. This will allow for the department to reinstate the second School
Liaison Officer Position and to restore two patrol officers.
-88-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds:
General Fund:
17,541,466
Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund (C.O.P.S.)
136,884
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 13,613,468 13,939,791 13,993,656 15,515,894 1,576,103 11.3%
Materials & Services 3,370,499 2,205,210 2,216,496 2,162,456 (42,754) -1.9%
Capital Outlay 24,650
Debt Service & Other
Total 17,008,617 16,145,001 16,210,152 17,678,350 1,533,349 9.5%
Total General Fund Budget
17,541,466
Parking and Traffic Fines
1,000,000
Police Service Charges
250,000
Reimbursement from County
360,000
Communication Services to
Other Cities
90,000
Communication Services to
non-General Fund Programs
85,000
Police Recovery Charges
40,000
Total Fee Revenue
1,825,000
Net General Fund Contribution *
15,716,466
. Includes Measure I Special Tax
125,556
-89-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION
Under the direction of the Chief of Police, the ultimate responsibility and coordination for aspects and
'management of the Department and effectively insuring that the policing needs are being met in the
community.
Budget (121)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
343,142 341,333 341,333 377,792 36,459 10.7%
185,264 195,494 195,494 185,537 (9,957) -5.1%
Administration Division
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
528,406
536,827
536,827
563,329
26,502
4.9%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
2.00
2.00
Total
2.00
2.00
-90-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SERVICES
Under the direction of a Police Captain, oversees all administrative duties and personnel within the
Administrative support area of the Police Department, including management and preparation of the
budget and grants.
Budget (122)
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
1,096,140 1,221,756 1,221,756 1,344,257 122,501 10.0%
1,204,492 102,179 102,801 102,374 195 0.2%
Services Division
Salaries & Benefits
Materials & Services
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total
2,300,632
1,323,935
1,324,557
1,446,631
122,696
9.3%
Positions Budget
Adopted
2005-06
Proposed
2006-07
Change
Full-Time
8.00
8.00
Total
8.00
8.00
-91-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
RECORDS
Responsible for processing and filing all police reports and distributing them as necessary to the
district attorney, allied agencies and the public. Records personnel also greet all citizens who
respond to the station, as well as answer all business phone lines and take care of their requests.
Records personnel do fingerprinting of individuals, and insure compliance with State, and Federal
mandates related to police operations and retention of reports. Records also have the responsibility
of the evidence function within the department.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Records Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 123 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 681,326 745,929 745,929 761,844 15,915 2.1%
Materials & Services 96,573 87,143 88,658 74,338 (12,805) -14.7%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 777,899 833,072 834,587 836,182 3,110 0.4%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 8.00 8.00
Part-Time 0.48 0.48
Total 8.48 8.48
-92-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
Responsible for handling all 911 emergency calls and dispatching police units as required and
performing all related requests for information via State and Federal data basis. Insures prompt
response to medical and fire related emergencies, coordinates multi-agency responses to emergencies
and handles all business call related calls when records section is closed. Dispatch also provides
dispatch services for Colma PD at night.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Communications Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 124 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 1,326,961 1,374,116 1,374,116 1,478,462 104,346 7.6%
Materials & Services 418,815 436,627 444,820 436,022 (605) -0.1%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other *
Total 1,745,776 1,810,743 1,818,936 1,914,484 103,741 5.7%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 11.80 12.20 0.40
Part-Time
Total 11.80 12.20 0.40
-93-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATIONS
Responsible for follow up investigations to all major cases in South San Francisco. Take a proactive
lead in narcotic and identity theft cases in the City. Coordinate with allied agencies on cases involving
other agencies at the municipal, state and federal level. Work closely with established task forces in San
Mateo County and administer the ABC education and enforcement grant.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Investigations Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (126) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 1,644,342 1,693,194 1,693,194 1,842,158 148,964 8.8%
Materials & Services 68,652 79,011 79,011 92,616 13,605 17.2%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,712,994 1,772,205 1,772,205 1,934,774 162,569 9.2%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 11.00 11.00
Part-Time 0.48 0.48
Total 11.48 11.48
-94-
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PATROL
Under the direction of a Police Captain, is responsible of the primary law enforcement activities in the City
and is the first respond to all police related emergencies. This division incorporates all of the Patrol
Officers, Traffic Unit and K-9 units and the gang officers as well as the Police Reserves.
Source of Funds:
General Fund
10,846,066
Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund (C.O.P.S.)
136,884
Change
Patrol Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 127 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 8,521,557 8,563,463 8,617,328 9,711,381 1,147,918 13.4%
Materials & Services 1,396,703 1,304,756 1,305,712 1,271,569 (33,187) -2.5%
Capital Outlay 24,650
Debt Service & Other
Total 9,942,910 9,868,219 9,923,040 10,982,950 1,114,731 11.3%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 63.00 66.00 3.00
Part-Time 2.69 2.69
Total 65.69 68.69 3.00
After the 2005-06 budget, two officers are charged to RDA, and one parking
enforcement officer is charged to the parking fund.
-95-
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
This page is intentionally blank.
-96-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
05/06 06/07
Director 1.00 1.00
ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE
05/06 06/07
(5.2 FTE Positions, included
in programs below.) Full- Time 19.90 1 9.45
Part-Time .37 .00
STREET MAINTENANCE & SEWER MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC SAFETY
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 14.15 14.20 Full-Time 8.00 8.15
FLEET MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 5.10 5.15 Full-Time 14.44 14.44
COMMON GREENS STORM WATER DRAINAGE
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time 5.94 7.14 Full-Time 4.75 4.55
~ '\
STORM WATER WATER QUALITY CONTROL
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full-Time .77 .77 Full-Time 36.65 36.85
Part-Time .74 .74
'-- ./
Note - 1 Parks Maintenance Worker position is charged to the
Redevelopment Agency. This position is reflected in the Redevelopment
Agency budget and is not included in the above numbers.
-97-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Public Works Department
MISSION
Maintain the City's parks, buildings, streets, trees, vehicles, infrastructure, Water
Quality Control Plant and other physical assets to insure the quality of life, public
safety, and use of the City infrastructure are at their best at all times. Process
sewage, storm water runoff, control debris, and comply with environmental
regulations. Participate in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and be ready
to assist other departments with their needs.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
· Replaced concrete walkways, and damaged curb and gutter islands in the
Common Greens area
· Replaced irrigation systems in the Common Greens area
· Installed Cultural Arts art piece (Cranes at Hickey I Junipero Serra)
· Renovated water damage at Municipal Services Building
· Renovated City Logo Sign at Municipal Services Building
· Painted exterior Municipal Services Building
· Installed new playground structure and landscaping at Gardiner Park
· Rededicated Sign Hill
· Began process of EI Camino corridor Master Plan
· Lined 1,117 feet of sewer lines
· Videoed 5,500 feet of sewer lines
· Demolished Greenhouses
· Completed the Pump Station Project at 27 So. Linden
· Increased capacity of four catch basins on Southcliff Avenue to reduce
street flooding
· Completed the retaining wall at Sign Hill
· Installed ADA ramp South San Francisco Main Library
· Partnered with the County of San Mateo to complete the improvements to
the Colma Creek channel
· Processed over 60 tree removal permits
· Updated WQCP operations agreements with other agencies
-98-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
Provide for the public good through effective maintenance of the City's
infrastructure and balance expenditures with services being as efficient as
possible without compromising quality of work or customer service needs. Be
cognizant of new and changing techniques in service and respond to regulations
and legislation in a positive and cooperative manner.
In 2006/07 the Public Works Department will:
. Work with other departments to complete Phase II of the Wet Weather
Program
. Work with other departments to complete the Orange Park Recreation
Building
. Work with other departments to begin construction of the BART Linear
Park
. Work with other departments to overlay, slurry, and cape seal over
$2,000,000 worth of streets
. Remove and replace over 100 City trees
. Renovate irrigation systems within the Common Greens
. Complete the EI Camino Real Landscape Master Plan
. Create new procedures and policies to comply with mandates from the
State Water Resources Board to avoid sewer spills
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
Transfer of a Sr. Engineer position out of the General Fund to the Sewer and
Common Greens' Funds will provide more dedicated resources to support capital
improvement project oversight and inspections for Public Works' projects. Project
coordination and management will reduce the amount of contract assistance
needed for small to midsize CIP projects. No other program or service level
changes are proposed.
-99-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds:
General Fund *
Garage Internal Service Fund
Common Greens & Landscape Maintenance Fund
Sewer Fund
Storm Water Fund
* Includes Measure I Special Tax
7,617,196
1,186,266
1,441,541
16,740,731
738,188
125,556
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed
Budget 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Salaries & Benefits 9,903,046 10,867,845 10,867,846 11,692,432
Materials & Services 13,148,275 10,475;294 10,595,015 11,209,730
Capital Outlay 33,000 37,568 121,800
Debt Service & Other 1.434,474 4,399.153 4,523,199 4,699,960
Total 24,485,795 25,775,292 26,023,628 27,723,922
Change
From
Adopted
BUdget
%
Change
824,587
734,436
88,800
300,807
7.6%
7.0%
1,948,630
7.6%
-100-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STREETS MAINTENANCE
This Division is responsible to maintain the City's infrastructure including but not limited to, sidewalks,
curbs and gutters, guard rails, fences, bridge structures, asphalt streets, parking lots, traffic signals,
street lights, street signs, painted legends, and the cleaning of the city streets. The Division performs
emergency repairs on a 24/7 basis and assists other departments as needed.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Streets Maintenance Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 145 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 1,228,019 1,411,301 1,411,302 1,533,942 122,641 8.7%
Materials & Services 1,116,281 1,099,594 1,105,203 1,245,468 145,874 13.3%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other 2,021 27,338 27,338 31,680 4,342
Total 2,346,321 2,538,233 2,543,843 2,811,090 272,857 10.7%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 14.15 14.20 0.05
Part-Time
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.10 0.10
Total 14.25 14.30 0.05
-101-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS MAINTENANCE
The Division is responsible to maintain the City's 170 acres of Parks, 18,500 City trees, park facilities,
landscaping, street medians, Sign Hill, School play fields, playgrounds, public buildings, and
recreational areas of public enjoyment. They perform all routine, preventative, and replacement
maintenance that includes mowing, irrigation, trimming, fertilizing, painting, cutting, and restroom
services.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Parks Maintenance Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 146 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 2,082,014 1,809,446 1,809,446 1,841,693 32,247 1.8%
Materials & Services 1,012,520 844,516 844,516 911,731 67,215 8.0%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 3,094,534 2,653,962 2,653,962 2,753,424 99,462 3.7%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 19.90 19.45 (0.45)
Part-Time 0.37 (0.37)
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.15 0.15
Total 20.42 19.60 (0.82)
-102-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
The Building Maintenance Division provides janitorial, preventive maintenance services, and
necessary building and related equipment repairs to all of the City's facilities. These include interior
and exterior work. The Division also performs a variety of tasks, which includes furniture moving, set
ups, recycled paper pick-up and many miscellaneous tasks as required.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Building Maintenance Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (147) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 1,169,623 1 ,193,243 1,193,244 1,253,844 60,601 5.1%
Materials & Services 783,831 772,444 772,444 798,838 26,394 3.4%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,953,454 1,965,687 1,965,688 2,052,682 86,995 4.4%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 14.44 14.44
Part-Time
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.10 0.10
Total 14.54 14.54
-103-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
COMMON GREENS
This Division is responsible to maintain the common landscaped areas and special Assessment
District grounds, which include West Park 1 J 2, & 3, Stonegate Ridge, Willow Gardens, Glenview
Commons, and Point Grand. Maintenance includes contract and in-house services for mowing,
trimming, irrigation and playground repairs.
Source of Funds: Common Greens & Landscaping Funds
Change
Common Greens Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 148 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
BUdget Change
Salaries & Benefits 323,562 540,856 540,856 763,041 222,1 85 41.1%
Materials & Services 580,599 635,752 635,752 678,500 42,748 6.7%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 904,161 1,176,608 1,176,608 1,441,541 264,933 22.5%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 5.94 7.14 1.20
Part-Time
Total 5.94 7.14 1.20
-104-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GARAGE
The City Garage provides fleet maintenance service to the City's fleet of vehicles and mechanical
equipment. Services, including scheduled preventive maintenance, required safety and smog
inspections, emergency repairs, and equipment modifications are performed as necessary to ensure
equipment is suitable for use and departmental users have reliable vehicles and equipment.
Source of Funds: City Services Fund
Change
Fleet Maintenance Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 149 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 528,553 531,720 531,720 569,767 38,047 7.2%
Materials & Services 613,308 469,990 469,990 609,699 139,709 29.7%
Capital Outlay 6,800 6,800
Debt Service & Other
Total 1,141,861 1,001,710 1,001,710 1,186,266 184,556 18.4%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 5.10 5.15 0.05
Part-Time
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.05 0.05
Total 5.15 5.20 0.05
-105-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER DRAINAGE
The Division was established to maintain the City's storm drainage infrastructure and to respond to
the mandate imposed by the Federal Government (The Clean Water Act) as monitored by the
Regional Water Quality Control Board to lessen pollution to the Bay. The purpose of the program is
to reduce storm water pollution and damage to streets and structures.
Source of Funds: Stormwater Fund
Change
Stormwater Drainage Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Division Budget ( 144) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 339,142 483,498 483,498 480,725 (2,773) -0.6%
Materials & Services 98,897 81,762 81 ,762 96,814 15,052 18.4%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 438,039 565,260 565,260 577,539 12,279 2.2%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 4.75 4.55 (0.20)
Part-Time
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.10 0.10
Total 4.85 4.65 (0.20)
-106-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WATER QUALITY CONTROL STORMWATER
The Stormwater Program is in response to a mandate imposed by the Federal Clean Water AGt
and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The purpose of the program is to prevent
stormwater pollution and protect the water quality of the San Francisco Bay and Pacific Ocean.
Source of Funds: Stormwater Fund
Change
Stormwater Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 138 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 76,324 93,073 93,073 100,973 7,900 8.5%
Materials & Services 51,824 80,665 80,665 59,676 (20,989) -26.0%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 128,148 173,738 173,738 160,649 (13,089) -7.5%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 0.77 0.77
Part-Time
Total 0.77 0.77
-107-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WATER QUALITY CONTROL
The purpose of the Water Quality Control Plant is to provide sewage control, treatment, and disposal
of residential, commercial, and industrial wastewater generated in South San Francisco, San Bruno.
and parts of Colma and Daly City in accordance with Federal and State requirements. The plant
handles an average daily flow of 13 million gallons and up to 62 million gallons a day during rain
storms.
Source of Funds: Sewer Rental Fund
Change
Water Quality Control Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 139 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
BUdget Change
Salaries & Benefits 3.554,172 3,984,424 3,984,424 4,259,818 275,394 6.9%
Materials & Services 8,423,989 6,303,767 6,417,671 6,609,858 306,091 4.9%
Capital Outlay 33,000 37,568 115,000 82,000
Debt Service & Other 1,428.562 4,371,815 4,469.661 4,668,280 296,465
Total 13,406,723 14,693,006 14,909,324 15,652,956 959,950 6.5%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 36.65 36.85 0.20
Part-Time 0.74 0.74
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.15 0.15
Total 37.54 37.74 0.20
-108-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SEWER MAINTENANCE
The Sewer Maintenance Division is responsible to maintain the City's sanitary sewer system which
includes main lines within the street and within other properties. Maintenance includes flushing,
rodding, jetting, repair of broken lines, T.V. work, and manhole maintenance. 24 hours, 7 day a
week emergency stand by for work is provided and reporting of spills and mandated procedures are
important elements of work to protect public health.
Source of Funds: Sewer Fund
Change
Sewer Maintenance Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (143) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 601,637 820,284 820,283 888,629 68,345 8.3%
Materials & Services 467,026 186,804 187,012 199,146 12,342 6.6%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other 3,891 26,200
Total 1,072,554 1,007,088 1,033,495 1,087,775 80,687 8.0%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 8.00 8.15 0.15
Part-Time
Allocation of Public Works Director 0.35 0.35
Total 8.35 8.50 0.15
-109-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
5/06 06/07
Director 1.00 1.00
/ '\ "\
RECREA TION ADMINISTRATION
5/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Full- Time 19.00 19.00 Full-Time 3.00 3.00
Part-Time 46.73 46.73 Part-Time 0.50 0.50
\.
-111-
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Recreation and Community Services Department
MISSION
The Recreation and Community Services Department provides opportunities for
physical, cultural and social well being; ensures effective use, scheduling and
requested maintenance of public facilities and open space; delivers recreation
and community services in a timely, efficient, and cost effective manner. The
department also supplies staff support to the City Council, Parks and Recreation
Commission, and the Cultural Arts Commission. Citizen boards include the
Senior Advisory Board and the Beautification Committee.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Advocated execution of Linear Park Agreement by BART and SamTrans Board
of Directors; continued progress toward issuance of Permit and Memorandum of
Understanding to allow construction and operation; completed design and
construction documents for Linear Park from Tanforan to Chestnut; submitted
application to City and County Association of Governments for $538,000 toward
grant funding for construction of Orange to Chestnut segment of the Linear Park,
outcome pending;
Selected Architect/Construction Management consultants for new Orange
Memorial Park Recreation Building; oversaw design development and began
work on construction drawings;
Calculated park-in-Iieu fees for two new residential developments, anticipating
approximately $1.4 million available for parks and recreation improvements in
Zone IV;
Renovated the Social Hall Restrooms in the Municipal Services Building, using
in-house resources to significantly reduce costs;
Received $30,000 in new funding from Kaiser Permanente to implement the
FRESH (Fitness, Recreation, Education, Socialization, Health) program, aimed
at the prevention of childhood obesity in department childcare programs;
Granted in excess of $7,000 in assistive listening equipment to allow for greater
quality of life for hearing impaired program participants;
Maintained full enrollment at two preschool, three after school, and two summer
campsites, exceeding revenue targets in this division;
Improved two classrooms at Terrabay Gymnasium to allow for better circulation,
accessibility, and rental marketing;
-112-
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Administered the Cultural Arts Commission's selection of a piece of sculpture,
Stone Horizon by Bruce Beasley, to be installed in Brentwood Park; oversaw the
second cycle of the Loan Art Program for Orange Park Sculpture Garden, to
result in the installation of one loaned sculpture;
Served as staff liaison and coordinated the use of City buildings, facilities and
fields by twelve non-profit co-sponsored groups including Youth Baseball
Managers, Pee Wee Baseball, PintolMustang League, United Youth Soccer,
Italian American Club (Bocce Ball), Tennis Club, Widows and Widowers, AARP,
SSF Mother's Club, Ballet Folkl6rico, Historical Society and the Aquatics Club.
OBJECTIVES
Continue to oversee design and construction of the Orange Park Recreation
Building, to be completed in spring of 2007; coordinate occupancy, staffing, and
programming of new facility; update the Orange Park Master Plan;
Complete negotiation of a Permit and a Memorandum of Understanding between
the City, BART, and SamTrans for the Linear Park; construct the segment from
Tanforan to Orange Avenue and from Orange to Chestnut if grant funding is
awarded;
Initiate capital improvement for Westborough Park picnic shelter, restrooms, and
upper playground using park-in-Iieu fees;
Oversee third cycle of the Loan Art Program at Orange Park Sculpture Garden;
facilitate continued acquisition of ~ublic art as funds allow, including a sculpture
to commemorate the city's 1 DOt Birthday in 2008, and pursue private and
corporate donations; organize art exhibits for display in city-owned vacant
buildings in an effort to enhance the attractiveness of the streetscape;
Implement the first free Concert in the Park, October 2006;
Continue to explore grant funds and developer fees for future projects.
RESOURCE OR PROGRAM/SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES
No change to ongoing programs or services is proposed.
-113-
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source of Funds:
General Fund 2,238,417
Fee Revenue 2,501,200
Change
Department Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
BUdget Change
Salaries & Benefits 3,513,972 3,635,353 3,635,353 3,862,428 227,075 6.2%
Materials & Services 1,558,523 889,209 889,209 877,189 (12,020) -1.4%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 5,072,495 4,524,562 4,524,562 4,739,617 215,055 4.8%
Total General Fund Budget 4,739,617
Childcare/Playground Programs 991,500
Classes 490,850
Aquatic Programs 299,000
Sports/Athletics 194,850
Senior Programs 223,000
Rentals 302,000
Total Fee Revenue 2,501,200
Net General Fund Contribution" 2,238,417
* Includes Measure I Special Tax 125,556
-114-
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION
The Recreation Administration division provides administration, direction, oversight, and
accountability for the Department. Staff support is provided for the City Council, Parks and
Recreation Commission, Cultural Arts Commission, Beautification Committee, and Senior Advisory
Board. Functions of the division include budget control, grant applications and administration,
parks and facility planning, and capital projects.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Administration Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget (171) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 394,197 515,052 515,052 570,039 54,987 10.7%
Materials & Services 459,928 256,007 256,007 239,947 (16,060) -6.3%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 854,125 771,059 771,059 809,986 38,927 5.0%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 4.00 4.00
Part-Time 0.50 0.50
Total 4.50 4.50
-115-
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
There are several programs within this division: Recreation Management, which includes day to
day operation of activity registration, general supervision, clerical, and office support; Aquatics;
Picnic and Facility Rentals; Adult Day Care and Senior Services, including nutrition and
transportation; Childcare, including pre-school and before and after school care; Sports, youth,
middle school sports programs, and adults; Cultural Arts; and Special Classes and Events. City
facilities operated include Terrabay Gymnasium, the Municipal Services Building, Orange Memorial
Park Swimming Pool and Recreation Building, Magnolia Center, Westborough Recreation Building
and Pre-School, and Siebecker Pre-School.
Source of Funds: General Fund
Change
Recreation Division Actual Adopted Amended Proposed From
Budget ( 172 ) 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adopted %
Budget Change
Salaries & Benefits 3,119,775 3,120,301 3,120,301 3,292,389 172,088 5.5%
Materials & Services 1,098,595 633,202 633,202 637,242 4,040 0.6%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service & Other
Total 4,218,370 3,753,503 3,753,503 3,929,631 176,128 4.7%
Positions Budget Adopted Proposed Change
2005-06 2006-07
Full-Time 19.00 19.00
Part-Time 46.73 46.73
Total 65.73 65.73
-116-
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
05/06 06/07
City Manager 0.20 0.20
/ " /
SHEARWATER ADMINISTRATION
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Assistant City Mgr. 0.10 0.10 H&R Manager 0.28 0.20
Ass't. to the City Mgr. 0.02 0.02 Sr. Planner 0.20 0.20
Admin. Assistant" 0.05 0.15 Financial Analyst I 0.00 0.00
Sr. Planner 0.05 0.05 Financial Analyst II 1.00 1.00
~ Sr. Civil Engineer 0.00 1.00
, Admin. Assistant II 0.00 0.10
/ "
EL CAMINO CORRIDOR DOWNTOWN / CENTRAL
05/06 06/07 05/06 06/07
Senior Planner 0.15 0.15 Assistant to City Mgr. 0.03 0.03
Assistant City Mgr. 0.10 0.10 Assistant City Mgr. 0.10 0.10
Ass't. to the City Mgr. 0.02 0.02 Admin. Assistant II 0.05 0.15
'Admin. Assistant" 0.05 0.15 Senior Planner 0.40 0.40
'-- ~ Park Maint. Worker 1.00 1.00
Literacy Servo Coord. 0.50 0.50
Literacy Program Mgr. 0.10 0.10
/ " Police Officer 2.00 2.00
GATEWAY Safety Inspector I 2.00 2.00
05/06 06/07
Admin. Assistant II 0.05 0.15
Ass't. to the City Mgr. 0.03 0.03 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING
Assistant City Mgr. 0.10 0.10 05/06 06/07
Senior Planner 0.05 0.05
\ Sr. Building Inspector 0.20 0.20
Note - The positions shown above are included in their home departments in the
Position Summary at the end of this budget document.
-117-
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 2006-07
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 2006-07
MERGED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA SUMMARY
Summary of Fund Balances
Actual Amended Projected Proposed
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07
Fund Balance (from prior page): 20,559,467 70,222,065 70,321,009 24,794,171
Bond Funds '
Prior Bonds (defeased 5/06) 2,257,834
2006 Redevelopment Bonds 46,348,945 46,348,945 5,229,945
Advance To Other Funds 10,920,000
Loans Receivable 547,688 597,688 597,688 622,688
All Other Reserved Funds 8,219,489
Unreserved / Undesignated
Fund Balance 9,534,456 23,275,432 23,374,376 8,021,538
Advances to Other Funds includes $4.5 million to East of 101 Sewer Impact Fee Fund for Pump Station improvements,
and $6.4 million to the Oyster Point Impact Fee Fund for Repayments to the County Transportation Authority
for Loans extended to complete the Oyster Point Flyover and Hookramps freeway interchange projects.
-119-
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 2006-07
LOW & MODERATE HOUSING
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Actual Amended Projected Proposed Change From %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Amended Budget Change
REVENUES
Transfers In from Redevelopment
Project Areas 3,689,724 3,484,500 3,600,534 4,038,914 554,414 15.9%
Interest & Other 412,710 360,000 460,000 480,700 120,700 33.5%
Misc. Revenue I Rent 299,546 70,000 110,000 150,000 80,000 114.3%
Total Revenues: 4,401,980 3,914,500 4,170,534 4,669,614 755,114 19.3%
USES OF FUNDS
Program Expenditures 516,738 1,517,300 1,250,000 1,829,800 312,500 20.6%
Capital Outlay 1,269,389 2,000,000 1,474,717 2,000,000 0.0%
Debt Service 327,588 344,089 344,089 347,552 3,463 1.0%
Housing Capital Projects 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,120,000 (380,000) -5.8%
Total Uses of Funds: 2,113,715 1 0,361 ,389 9,568,806 10,297,352 (64,037) -0.6%
Excess of Revenues
over (under) Expenditures 2,288,265 (6,446,889) (5,398,272) (5,627,738)
Fund Balance 24,607,578 18,160,689 19,209,305 13,581,567
Less:
Loan Commitments to 1,026,632 1,026,632 1,026,632 1,026,632
Mid Pen and Other
Loans Receivable 9,061,853 9,061,853 9,061,853 9,061,853
Bond Funds, End of Year 2,639,414
All Other Reserved Funds 6,581,431
Unreserved I Undesignated
Fund Balance 5,298,248 8,072,204 9,120,820 3,493,082
-120-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS, 2006-07
Sewer Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change from %
Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Projected Change
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget
REVENUES
Operations:
Charges for Services 10,784,174 11,400,000 11,450,000 12,541,000 1,091,000 9.5%
Other Cities 3,544,816 6,034,000 6,034,000 5,521,000 (513,000) -8.5%
Connection Fees and Other 558,411 413,000 267,000 250,000 (17,000) -6.4%
State Revolving Loan & Bond Funds 11,531,727 3,000,000 12,133,955 7,507,000 (4,626,955) -38.1%
Developer Fees 334,907 165,000 800,000 155,000 (645,000) -80.6%
InteresVOther income 61,427 56,000 60,000 30,000 (30,000) -50.0%
Total Revenues 26,815,462 21,068,000 30,744,955 26,004,000 (4,740,955) -12:.1%
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses 13,047,176 11,328,278 10,485,000 12,072,450 1,587,450 15.1%
Debt Service 3,883,850 4,371,815 4,398,015 4,668,280 270,265 6.1%
Capital Expenditures 16,933,752 4,180,000 14,486,997 9,768,000 (4,718,997) -32.6%
Net Changes to Balance Sheet, Yr. End (562,811 )
Total Expenditures 33,301,968 19,880,093 29,370,012 26,508,730 (2,861,282) -9,7%
Net Income (6,486,506) 1,187,907 1 ,374,943 (504,730)
Total Fund Balance (2,500,878) (1,312,971 ) (1,125,935) 2,869,335
Emergency Capital Repairs Reserve 502,000 753,000 753,000 1,000,000
Advances from Redevelopment Agency * 4,500,000
Reserved for East of 101 Sewer Projects 963,120 1,128,120 1,763,120 1,918,120
Undesignated Reserve,
End of Year (3,965,998) (3,194,091 ) (3,642,055) (4,548,785)
* Proposed Capital Improvement Projects include key East of 101 infrastructure improvements that will be funded
through development fees over the next 3-5 years as development occurs. An Advance from the Redevelopment
will allow the Sewer Fund to complete lhese projects up front to facilitate development, and pay back the Agency
with interest.
The Sewer Fund consists of the Water Quality Control Plant Division, the
Sewer Maintenance Division, and planned Sewer capital project expenses
-121-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS, 2006-07
Parking District Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
From
Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Operations:
Parking Fees 400,845 350,000 428,000 435,000 85,000 24.3%
Interest and Other 21,439 30,000 23,000 25,000 (5,000) -16.7%
Total Reven,Ues 422,284 380,000 451,000 460,000 80,000 21.1%
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses 229,087 298,230 284,000 355,369 57,139 19.2%
Transfers Out 75,000
Capital Outlay 602,171 300,000
Total Expenditures 906,258 298,230 584,000 355,369 57,139 19.2%
Net Income (483,974) 81,770 (133,000) 104,631
Undesignated Fund Equity * 690,227 771,997 557,227 661,858
* Net of Fixed Assets
-122-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS, 2006-07
Storm Water Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
From %
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Adopted Change
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget
REVENUES
Operations:
Service Charges 410,807 460,000 408,000 412,000 (48,000) -10.4%
Transfer In from Gas Tax Fund 200,000
Interest and Other 2,315 15,000 9,000 10,000 (5,000) -33.3%
Total Revenues 413,122 475,000 417,000 622,000 (53,000) -11.2%
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses 566,187 738,998 639,500 738,188 (810) -0.1%
Transfers Out to Capitallmpr Fund 19,500
Total Expenditures 566,187 738,998 659,000 738,188 (810) -0.1%
Net Income (153,065) (263,998) (242,000) (116,188)
Undesignated Fund Equity * 452,180 188,182 210,180 93,992
* (Net of Fixed Assets)
-123-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
Gas Tax Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
Adopted From
Actual Budget Projected Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Gas Tax 1,302,168 1,038,200 1,180,000 1,180,000 141,800 13.7%
San Mateo County Traffic Congestion
Relief 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 0.0%
C/CAG 59,800 59,800 59,800 59,800 0 0.0%
Interest/other income 31,471 25,000 32,000 32,000 7,000 28.0%
Total Revenues 1 ,393,439 1,273,000 1,421,800 1,421,800 148,800 11.7%
-
EXPENDITURES
Transers Out to General Fund for
Street Maint/Gen Engineering 886,000 1,036,000 886,000 686,000 -350,000 -33.8%
Transfers Out to General Fund for
Congestion Relief 149,960 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 0.0%
Transfer Out to Stormwater Fund 200,000 200,000
Transfers Out to CIP Fund 390,138 243,545 827,543 1,000,000 756,455 310.6%
Shift in Funding Sources (340,000)
T ota! Expenditures 1,426,098 1,089,545 1,863,543 2,036,000 606,455 55.7%
Net Income (32,659) 183,455 (441,743) (614,200)
Designated for Future Street
Improvement Capital Projects 1.288.468 1.471 923 846 725 232 525
-124-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
Measure A Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
Adopted From
Actual Budget Projected Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Measure A Sales Tax 889,267 902,000 1,032,000 1,052,640 150,640 16.7%
Interest and Other 20,971 25,000 33,000 35,000 10,000 40.0%
Total Revenues 910,238 927,000 1,065,000 1,087,640 160,640 ~
EXPENDITURES
Transfers Out to CIP Fund for
Street Improvement Projects 759,596 706,000 1,665,120 1,200,000 494,000 70.0%
Total Expenditures 759,596 706,000 1,665,120 1,200,000 494,000 70.0%
Net Income 150,642 221,000 (600,120) (112,360)
Designated for Future Street
Improvement Capital Projects 1,031,701 1,252,701 431,581 319,221
-125-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
EXPENDITURES
CDBG Program Expenditures 521,539 764,877 676,231 696.887 (67,990) -8.9%
Transfers Out - General Fund 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 0.0%
Transfers Out - Capital Projects 49,737
Prior Year Allocation for New Loans 300,000 300,000
Total Expenditures 606,276 799.877 711.231 1.031,887 (67,990) -8.5%
Net Income (40,424) 5,360 16,671 (91,603)
Designated for CDBG Programs (40.203) (115.135)
(23.532)
* Negative fund balance reflects lag in funding from CDBG (reimbursement basis)
-126-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
Common Greens Maintenance Districts
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
From
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Property Taxes 1,101,456 1,168,000 1,168,000 1,226,000 58,000 5.0%
Other Income 9,456 2,900 4,911 5,000 2,100 72.4%
Total Revenues 1,110,912 1,170,900 1,172,911 1,231,000 60,1 00 5.1%
EXPENDITURES
Maintenance Expenditures 904,180 1,176,608 1,050,000 1,441,541 264,933 22.5%
Transfers Out to Capital Imp Fund 168,131 125,000 125,000 385,000 260,000 208.0%
Total Expenditures 1,072,311 1,301,608 1,175,000 1,826,541 524,933 40.3%
Net Income 38,601 (130,708) (2,089) (595,541 ) (464,833)
Designated for Common Green
Maintenance and Capital Impr 2,729,909 2,727,820 2,132,279
-127-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
Solid Waste Fund
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Change
From
Actual Amended Projected Proposed Amended %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 BUdget Change
REVENUES
Franchise Fee Revenue 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 0.0%
State Grant
Total Revenues 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 0.0%
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures 82,283 249,680 116,146 168,289 (81,391 ) -32.6%
Transfers Out to Capital Impr 1,340 287,483 (287,483) -100.0%
Other Transfers Out 37,500 (37,500) -100.0%
Total Expenditures 83,623 574,663 116,146 168,289 (406,374) -70.7%
Net Income 89,702 (401,338) 57,179 5,036
Designated for Ongoing
Capital Improvement 287,489
Designated for Other Solid
Waste Reduction Purposes 320,803 551,114 546,078
-128-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Miscellaneous Special Revenue Funds
The City of South San Francisco sponsors several programs that are designed to be
self-supporting in terms of revenue raised. Because these programs are designed to be
self-supporting from outside revenues, they are accounted for as Special Revenue
Funds outside the General Fund. Descriptions of the programs are as follows:
Dav in the Park:
Day in the Park is a daylong event at Orange Memorial Park in September each
year that is intended to be a celebration of, and a showcase for, the many
important community groups and service organizations that provide services to
the community. Funds are raised from corporate sponsors and through raffle
ticket sales. Raffle ticket sale proceeds are returned to the group that raised the
money, and other donations, after paying for the direct costs of setting up the
booths and the event, are used to support community groups.
Commute Reduction Proqrams:
The City of South San Francisco coordinates, with the assistance of the
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance Joint Powers Authority (the ALLIANCE) a
series of commuter shuttles for East of 101 employers. Employers pay the City
for a share of those shuttles, which transport employees to and from the CalTrain
and BART stations. This service reduces commute trips into South San
Francisco. The City also receives funds from CalTrain and from SamTrans. The
City then uses those funds to pay for shuttle bus services.
In addition to the shuttles, Genentech currently donates funds to offset the cost of
free taxicab service to and from downtown during lunch hour. This service is
designed to attract employees into the downtown area without generating
additional automobile trips.
Human Resources (HR) Consortium:
The City of South San Francisco is the host entity with several other cities in a
cooperative arrangement for Communications Dispatcher testing and recruitment
services. By funding this program jointly, each City saves resources by not
having to duplicate those services. Each member city contributes an annual fee
to the City of South San Francisco, and the City administers the payment
processing of the program on all members' behalf.
Air Truck Joint Powers Authoritv (JPA):
In 1989, the City of South San Francisco entered into a JPA with, along with
Colma, San Bruno, Daly City, Pacifica, and Brisbane, to facilitate the joint
purchase and maintenance of a specialized piece of firefighting equipment, a
Mobile Air Compressor Unit (Air Truck). Each year, JPA members pay the City
of South San Francisco for their share of the cost of maintaining that Air Truck.
-129-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, 2006-07
Miscellaneous Other Special Revenue Funds
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Net Income
Adopted Budget, 2006-07
Commute Total
Day in Reduction HR Air Truck Adopted
the Park Programs Consortium JPA 2006-07
REVENUES
Donations 85,000 6,500 91,500
Raffle Ticket Sales 25,000 25,000
Other City Contributions 19,000 9,000 28,000
Total Revenues 110,000 6,500 19,000 9,000 144,500
EXPENDITURES
Day in the Park 104,000 104,000
Downtown Dasher 6,500 6,500
Joint City Human Resources Expenses 19,000 19,000
Vehicle Maintenance 9,000 9,000
Transfer Out to General Fund 6,000 6,000
Total Expenditures 110,000 6,500 19,000 9,000 144,500
Net Income
-130-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
CITY SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
Vehicle Maintenance
(City Garage Operating Budget)
Change
From
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Charges to Departments 985,506 1,001,890 1,203,000 1,224,685 222,795 22.2%
Interest & Other Income 7,028 5,526
Transfers In 100,000
Total Revenues 1,092,534 1,001,890 1,208,526 1,224,685 222,795 22.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries & Benefit 528,553 531,720 545,000 569,767 38,047 7.2%
Materials & Services 613,308 469,990 640,000 609,699 139,709 29.7%
Capital Outlay 6,800 6,800
Debt Service & Other
Total Expenditures 1,141,861 1,001,710 1,185,000 1,186,266 184,556 18.4%
Excess of Revenues
over Expenditures (49,327) 180 23,526 38,419
Unrestricted Net Assets
Beginning of Year 6,314 (43,013) (19,487)
Unrestricted Net Assets
End of Year (43,013) (19,487) 18,932
-131-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
Equipment Replacement Fund
Change
From
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Operating Budget Charges:
Equipment 205,313 232,107 232,107 224,527 (7,580) -3.3%
Vehicles 440,997 471,214 471,214 433,858 (37,356) -7.9%
Lease Proceeds 123,549 457,000 583,286 830,000 373,000 81.6%
Interest & Other Income 269,664 110,000 120,000 100,000 (10,000) -9.1%
Total Revenues 1,039,523 1,270,321 1,406,607 1,588,385 318,064 25.0%
EXPENDITURES
Vehicle Replacement 318,434 293,500 336,550 515,000 221,500 75.5%
Equipment Replacement 118,673 607,300 387,012 447,400 (159,900) -26.3%
Lease Purchase (Vehicles) 457,000 583,286 830,000 373,000 81.6%
Debt Service 1,601
Transfer Out to Capital
Improvement Fund 860,841 600,000 600,000
Total Expenditures 1 ,299,549 1,357,800 1,306,848 2,392,400 1,034,600 76.2%
Excess of Revenues
over Expenditures (260,026) (87,479) 99,759 (804,015) (716,536)
Undesignated Reserve 2,609,788 2,522,309 2,709,547 1,905,532
* Adjusted for net effects of depreciation and transfer of assets to balance sheet for CAFR
-132-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
PROPOSED VEHICLE PURCHASES, 2006-07
Department / Division Vehicle to be Purchased Cost
Direct Purchases
Police Patrol Sedan 31,000
Police Patrol Sedan 31,000
Police Patrol Sedan 31,000
Police Motorcycle 18,000
Fire Pickup Truck 16,000
Fire 3/4 Ton 4WD Diesel Truck with Shell 70,000
Parks Pickup Truck 21,000
Parks Pickup Truck 21,000
Parks Light Truck 14,500
Parks Light Truck 14,500
Parks Light Truck 14,500
Parks Light Truck 14,500
Building Inspection Light Truck 15,000
Streets Pickup Truck 21,000
Streets Sweeper 160,000
Building Maintenance Van 22,000
Vehicle Replacement Total $ 515,000
Lease Purchases
Fire Fire Truck 415,000
Fire Fire Truck 415,000
Lease Purchase Total $ 830,000
Deferred Purchases
Police SUV 35,000
Police SUV 35,000
Police Motorcycle 18,000
Fire 1 Ton 4WD Diesel Truck with Utility Body 50,000
Parks Steam Cleaner (from 2005-06) 10,000
Parks Heavy Duty Truck 40,000
Parks Truck 22,000
Streets Van 18,000
Streets Pickup Truck 21,000
Garage Truck 22,000
Garage Pool Car 27,000
$ 298,000
-133-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PURCHASES, 2006-07
Department / Division Equipment to be Purchased Cost
City Council 4 PCs $ 8,000
City Council 3 Notebooks 8,400
City Clerk 2 PCs 4,000
City Manager Projector 5,300
City Manager 1 Laser Printer 1,950
Finance 2 PCs 4,000
Finance 1 Laser Printer 1,950
HR 6 PCs 12,000
HR 2 Notebooks 2,800
HR 1 Projector 3,100
ECD -- Admin 1 PC 2,000
ECD -- Building 2 PCs 4,000
ECD -- Engineering 3 Workstations 8,300
ECD -- Engineering 1 Notebook 2,800
ECD -- Engineering 1 Laser Printer 2,200
ECD -- Engineering Software 15,400
Fire 5 PCs 10,000
Fire 4 Notebooks 11 ,200
Fire 1 Laser Printer 1,950
Fire 4 Defribrillators 19,200
Police 30 PCs 60,000
Police 1 Laser Printer 1,950
Police Scanner 8,300
Police 2 servers 15,600
Recreation 4 PCs 8,000
Recreation 3 Laser Printers 8,000
Recreation 1 Scanner 1 ,400
Library 63 PCs 124,000
Library 4 Laser Printers 11,700
Library 2 servers 5,600
Library 1 Notebook 2,800
Information Technology Citywide Network Equipment 71 ,500
Equipment Replacement Total $ 447,400
-134-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
DEFERRED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FOR 2006-07
Department / Division Purchases to be Deferred * Cost
Finance Midrange Server $ 73,000
Finance Check Printing System 10,000
Finance 1 PC 2,000
Finance 1 Notebook 2,800
ECD -- Admin 1 Notebook 2,800
ECD -- Planning 3 PCs 4,500
Public Works 2 PCs 4,000
Public Works 1 Notebook 2,800
Recreation 24 PCs 48,000
Recreation 1 Notebook 2,800
Library 21 PCs 42,000
Library 2 Laser Printers 3,900
Library 2 Notebooks 5,600
Library Projector & Screen 3,300
Library 2 Projector 5,000
Library 2 Microfilm Scanner 13,600
Library 1 Scanners 1,400
Police Fire Alerting System Upgrade 16,500
Deferred Equipment Replacement Total $ 244,000
* The items listed above are eligible for replacement based on their age, but the
department has deferred replacing it, as it is still functional.
-135-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
CITY SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
Information Technology
Change
From
Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Charges to Departments 1,191,232 1,130,513 1,130,513 1,218,552 88,039 7.8%
Charges to Other Agencies 83,024 36,000 36,000 24,000 (12,000) -33.3%
Other Revenue 17,015
Total Revenues 1,274,256 1,166,513 1,183,528 1 ,242,552 76,039 6.5%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries & Benefit 71 2,440 790,673 649,428 825,531 34,858 4.4%
Materials & Services 514,206 400,119 373,208 417,021 16,902 4.2%
Total Expenditures 1,226,646 1,190,792 1,022,635 1,242,552 51,760 4.3%
Excess of Revenues
over Expenditures 47,610 (24,279) 160,893
Undesignated Reserve
Beginning of Year 198,484 246,094 406,987
Undesignated Reserve
End of Year 246,094 406,987 406,987
-136-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
CITY SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
-137-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
Self Insurance Fund
Change
From
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Adopted %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Budget Change
REVENUES
Worker's Compensation 821,885 953,000 929,750 1,591,500 638,500 67.0%
General Liability 768,220 702,000 702,800 903,189 201 ,189 28.7%
Interest Income 40,765 40,000 50,000 55,000 15,000 37.5%
Other 15,750 350,000
Transfer In 780,441 1,000,000
Total Revenue 2,427,061 1,695,000 3,032,550 2,549,689 854,689 50.4%
EXPENDITURES
Injury Pay 321 ,173 305,000 289,525 350,000 45,000 14.8%
Claims Defense & Management 182,069 100,000 1,291,203 200,000 100,000 100.0%
Insurance Premiums 667,851 777,000 670,000 749,689 (27,311 ) -3.5%
Workers Compensation Claims 693,471 693,000 989,924 1,200,000 507,000 73.2%
Liability Claims 405,897 150,000 72,054 150,000 0.0%
Claims Settlement
Transfer Out
Total Expenses 2,270,462 2,025,000 3,312,706 2,649,689 624,689 30.8%
-
Excess of Revenues over/(under)
Expenses 156,600 (330,000) (280,156) (100,000) 230,000
Cash Balance, End of Year 2,548,295 2,219,403 2,268,139 2,168,139 (51,264)
Estimated Liabilities 4,917,657 4,664,216 4,417,657 4,317,657 (346,559)
Cash as a % of Liabilities 52% 48% 51% 50%
-138-
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, 2006-07
Health and Benefits Internal Service Fund
Actual Adopted Estimated Proposed Change from %
2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2006-07 Adop. BUdget Change
Revenues
Indirect Benefits 1,235,991 1,587,081 1,578,924 1,992,064 404,983 25.5%
Leave Accrual Charges 289,007 335,000 289,903 337,743 2,743 0.8%
Insurance Refund 2,511 129,785 135,000 135,000
Interest
Total Revenue 1,527,943 1,922,081 1,998,612 2,464,807 542,726 28.2%
Expenditures:
Vacation payouts 396,105 402,000 370,000 384,800 (17,200) -4.3%
Sick Leave payouts 192,883 208,000 90,000 150,000 (58,000) -27.9%
Accrued VaclSick Leave 38,331 50,000 50,000 0.0%
Dental and Vision 580,048 503,500 465,621 490,000 (13,500) -2.7%
Retiree Health Insurance 1,000,671 1,105,650 1,145,000 1,312,000 206,350 18.7%
Unemployment Insurance 80,077 75,000 40,000 40,000 (35,000) -46.7%
Other Benefits Admin 20,314 6,000 20,076 25,000
19,qOO 316.7%
Total Expenditures 2.628,270 2,350,150 2,130,697 2,451,800 101,650 4.3%
Excess of Revenues
over Expenditures (1,100,327) (428,069) (132,085) 13,007
Transfer to General Fund. (972,765) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (700,000)
Fund Balance $1,856,594 $428,525 $724,509 37,516
. Reflects transfer to General Fund of prior years' accumulated fund balance.
-139-
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
-
2.00
1.07
3.07
1.00
-
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
-
-
4.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
0.81
-
-
4.81
2005-2006.
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
- -
- -
2.00 2.00
1.07 1.07
3.07 3.07
1.00 1.00
- -
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
- -
- -
4.00 4.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00
0.81 0.81
-
- -
4.81 4.81
2004-2005
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
-
-
3.00
1.00
1.00
-
1.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.50
5.50
2003-2004
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
-
-
3.00
1.00
1.00
0.80
1.00
1.00
4.80
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.50
5.50
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
Administrative Departments
(Elected official)
II
City Clerk
City Clerk
Administrative Assistant
El00
0310
A295
Office Specialist
Part- Time Hourly Position
Pff Office Specialist
X415
Department Tata
City Manager
City Manage
Assistant City Manager
Director of Community Outreach
Assistant to the City Manager
Executive Assistant to City Manager
Nl15
N100
M130
N180
M550
0305
0310
I
......
~
......
I
Administrative Aide
Administrative Assistant
II
Department Tata
Human Resources
Human Resources
II
Director of
Human Resources Analyst
N130
M270
Part- Time Hourly Position
Human Resources Clerk
Ollice Assistant
Department Tata
R310
X440
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
-
2.00
1.00
4.00
-
2.00
1.00
1.00
13.00
1.00
-
1.00
2.00
2.00
6.00
2005-2006,
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
- -
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
- -
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
13.00 13.00
1.00 1.00
- -
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
6.00 6.00
2004-2005
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
13.00
1.00
-
1.00
2.00
2.00
6.00
2003-2004
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
14.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
8.00
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
(Elected official)
City Treasurer
Finance
E105
Director of Finance
Assistant Director of Finance
Accountant
Accountant II
Financial Services Supervisor
Accounting Assistant II
N145
M105
M100
M620
M540
II
Financial Analyst
Financial Analyst II
Administrative Assistant
Courier
A225
M600
M610
0310
A455
Department Total
I
~
fl::>..
IV
I
Information Technology
Information Technology
Director of
Information Technology Manager
Administrative Assistant II
N165
M4BO
0310
M650
A525
System Administrators
Information Systems Technician
Department Tota
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
-
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.95
12.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
10.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
-
-
1.00
6.00
-
28.95
2005-2006,
Adopted AlT!ended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.75 1.75
12.75 12.75
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
10.00 10.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
- -
- -
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
- -
27.75 27.75
2004-2005
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.75
12.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
10.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
5.50
-
28.25
2003-2004
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.75
12.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
10.00
-
22.75
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
o
Economic and Community Development
Assistant City Manager
City Planner
Principal Planner
Associate Planner
Senior Planner
Manager of Housing and Redevelopment
Rehabilitation Specialist
Community Development Coordinator
Parking Meter Collector/Repairer
Administrative Assistant II
Nl00
M155
M590
M125
M335
M145
M70
M725
A245
0310
A295
Ollice Specialist
E&CD Subtotal
Building Division
I
.....
fI:>.
VJ
I
City Building Ollicial
Permit Technician
Senior Building Inspector
Building Inspector
Administrative Assistant
Ollice Specialist
M210
A460
MOO
A135
0315
A295
Building Subtotal
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
(Public Works in 03-04)
Engineering Division
City Engineer
Senior Engineer
Associate Engineer
Engineering Technician
Engineering Project Coordinator
Construction Manager
Administrative Assistant
M430
M340
Ml15
A167
A330
M690
0315
Engineering Subtotal
Department Tota
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
15.00
15.00
6.00
30.00
1.00
-
2.00
-
1.00
-
1.00
1.00
78.00
0.48
-
78.48
2005-2006.
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
15.00 15.00
15.00 15.00
6.00 6.00
30.00 30.00
1.00 1.00
- -
2.00 2.00
- -
1.00 1.00
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
78.00 78.00
0.48 0.48
- -
78.48 78.48
2004-2005
Adopted
2003-2004
Adopted
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
.00
.00
.00
3.00
15.00
15.00
6.00
30.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
.00
.00
2.00
3.00
15.00
15.00
6.00
30.00
1.00
2.00
Fire
Fire Chief
Deputy Fire Chief
Battalion Chief (40 Hours
Battalion Chief (shi
Fire Captain
Fire Apparatus Engineer
Firefighter
Paramedic I Firefighter
EMS Coordinator
(a)
Safety Inspector
Safety Inspector
Management Analyst
Fire Marshal
.00
.00
1.00
2.00
II
Administrative Assistant II
Administrative Assistant I
Senior Administrative Assistant
Nl50
MIlO
M205
M390
8100
8120
8125
8130
81B5
A145
8200
M5S0
M410
0310
0315
0340
I
I-'
~
~
I
79.00
81.00
Part. Time Hourly Position
Courier
0.48
0.48
X540
79.48
In addition to the total count shown, authority 10 overhire by three in this position has been granted by the city manager.
No additional dollars have been added for these potential overhires.
81.48
Department Tota
(a)
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
-
3.00
-
1.00
23.00
0.50
-
1.25
0.50
2.75
0.76
-
0.19
-
7.60
0.06
1.86
0.68
16.15
-
39.15
2005-2006.
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
4.00 4.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
- -
3.00 3.00
- -
1.00 1.00
23.00 23.00
0.50 0.50
- -
1.25 1.25
0.50 0.50
2.75 2.75
0.76 0.76
- -
0.19 0.19
- -
7.60 7.60
0.06 0.06
1.86 1.86
0.68 0.68
16.15 16.15
- -
39.15 39.15
2004-2005
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
-
1.00
23.00
0.50
-
1.25
0.50
2.75
0.76
-
0.19
0.06
7.90
0.40
2.10
0.68
17.09
-
40.09
2~4
Adopted
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
Library
.00
.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
.00
(1.5 grant-funded)
Library Director
Assistant Library Director
Librarian II
Library Program Manager
Library Assistant II
Literacy Program Manager
Circulation Supervisor
Literacy Services Coordinator
Office Specialist
Administrative Assist~mt I
Administrative Assistant II
Management Assistant
N110
M640
A240
M235
A215
M500
M560
A445
A295
0315
0310
0330
23.00
0.50
0.18
.25
3.25
1.01
0.50
0.19
0.06
8.57
0.40
2.10
0.68
(partial grant funding)
(partial grant funding)
(partial grant funding)
(partial grant funding)
(partial grant funding)
Part- Time Hourly Positions
Librarian I
Librarian I
Librarian II
Library Assistant II
Library Assistant I
Library Assistant I
Local History Specialist
Library Clerk
Computer Assistant Coordinator
Library Pages
Literacy Services Coordinator
Literacy Services Assistant
Office Assistant
R210
X210
R240
R215
R220
X220
R630
X235
X320
X250
X655
X665
X440
I
f->
fI::>..
Ul
I
18.69
Subtotal for Part- Time Positions
41.69
Department Total
(For 2006-07,4.75 FTE, Including 1.5 full-time positions, are funded through grants.
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
6.00
5.00
.
5.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
23.00
-
0.50
0.50
-
5.42
1.92
1.09
1.25
10.85
5.16
16.16
0.22
4.16
47.23
-
70.23
2005-2006,
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
6.00 6.00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
5.00 5.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
23.00 23.00
- -
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
-
5.42 5.42
1.92 1.92
1.09 1.09
1.25 1.25
10.85 10.85
5.16 5.16
16.16 16.16
0.22 0.22
4.16 4.16
47.23 47.23
- -
70.23 70.23
2004-2005
Adopted
.00
.00
6.00
2.00
4.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
.00
.00
24.00
0.48
0.48
5.42
1.92
1.09
1.25
11.72
4.41
6.16
1.42
2.07
46.42
70.42
2003-2004
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
6.00
2.00
4.00
7.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
26.00
0.48
0.75
8.17
1.10
1.54
13.55
5.20
16.66
2.92
1.10
51.47
-
77.47
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
Recreation and Community Services
N17S Director of Recreation and Community Services
M71S Recreation & Community Services Manager
M29S Recreation & Community Services Supervisor
MS30 Recreation & Community Services Program Coordinator
A42S Community Services Site Coordinator
A49S Preschool Teacher
0310 Administrative Assistant II
A29S Office Specialist
AS10 Van Driver
AS1S Recreation leader IV
Part- Time Hourly Positions
X650 Cultural Arts Specialist
R650 Cultural Arts Specialist
R660 Community Services Site Coordinator
X660 Community Services Site Coordinator
X350 Recreation Instructor
X370 Sports Coach
X360 Recreation leader I
R365 Recreation leader II
X365 Recreation leader II
R370 Recreation leader III
X370 Recreation leader III
R375 Recreation leader IV
X375 Recreation leader IV
Subtotal for Part- Time Positions
Department Total
I
~
~
0\
I
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
46.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
9.20
1.00
1.00
110.20
0.48
0.48
1.31
1.38
3.65
-
113.85
2005-2006.
Adopted Amended
2004-2005
Adopted
2003-2004
Adopted
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
43.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
8.80
.00
.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
43.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
8.80
.00
.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
43.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
9.80
1.00
.00
.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
46.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
9.80
.00
.00
Police
Chief of Police
Police Captain
Police Lieutenant
Police Sergeant
Police Corporal
Police Officer (b)
Parking Enforcement Officer
Police Service Technician
Senior Police Records Specialist
Police Records Specialist
Police Property & Evidence Specialist
Police Records Manager
Communications Manager
Supervising Communications Dispatcher
Communications Dispatcher'
Senior Administrative Assistant
Administrative Assistant
N155
M2BO
M275
C165
Cl00
Cl15
C175
C125
Clao
Cl05
Cll0
M290
M165
A365
A150
0340
0315
I
.....
~
'I
I
106.80
0.48
0.48
.31
.38
106.80
0.48
0.48
.31
.38
107.80
0.48
0.48
.31
.38
110.80
0.48
0.48
.31
.38
Part- Time Hourly Positions
Court Liason
Police Evidence Clerk
Police Reserve Officer
School Crossing Guard
X193
X190
X325
X405
3.65
3.65
3.65
3.65
Subtotal for Part- Time Positions
110.45
110.45
In addition to the total count shown, authority to overhire by three in this position has been granted by the city manager.
No additional dollars have been added for these potential overhires.
111.45
114.45
Department Total
(b)
32 hour positions with 2
reconciles budget to AFSCME minimum staffing requirement
In order to comply with AFSCME minimum staffing requirements, department filled 2 vacant
40 hour positions in 2005-06 in order to save overtime dollars. Above adjustment
2006.2007
Proposed
.00
.00
.00
.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
7.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
14.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
6.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
76.00
76.00
2005-2006,
Adopted Amended
- -
- -
1.00 1.00
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00
7.00 7.00
1.00 1.00
- -
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 2.00
14.00 14.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
6.00 6.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
-
- -
75.00 75.00
0.37 0.37
75.37 75.37
2004.2005
Adopted
-
1.00
-
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
7.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
14.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
6.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
-
-
74.00
0.37
74.37
2003-2004
Adopted
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
.00
.00
2.00
4.00
5.00
11.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
8.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
(formerly Maintenance Services)
Maintenance
Director of Maintenance Services
Director of Public Works
Deputy Director of Maintenance Services
Superintendent of Public Works
Superintendent of Parks and Facilities
Senior Engineer
Public Works Inspector
Public Works Supervisor
Lead Public Works Main!. Worker
Senior Public Works Main!. Worker
Public Works Maintenance Worker
Public Works
Lead Electrical Technician
Senior Electrical Technician
Electrical Technician
Sweeper Operator
Public Works Supervisor (Garage)
Lead Equipment Mechanic
Equipment Mechanic
Public Works Supervisor II
Public Works Supervisor (Parks)
Lead Park Maintenance Worker
Senior Park Maintenance Worker
N170
Nl60
M630
M365
M360
M340
A330
M255
A200
A360
A275
A335
A500
A160
A370
M255
A345
A170
Park Maintenance Worker
Tree Trimmer
Groundsperson
Equipment Operator
Maintenance Craftsworker
Public Works Supervisor (Building Maintenance)
Lead Building Maintenance Custodian
Senior Building Maintenance Custodian
Building Maintenance Custodian
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Administrative Assistant II
Administrative Assistant
M255
A195
A350
A250
A375
A505
A175
A280
M255
A190
A320
A140
A465
0310
0315
A295
I
~
~
00
,
85.00
Office Specialist
0.37
85.37
Part- Time HOUrly Positions
Greenhouse Manager
Subtotal
X570
2006-2007
Proposed
-
1.00
1.00
-
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
13.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.80
37.80
0.50
-
q.24
-
-
0.74
-
38.54
-
114.54
2005-2006,
Adopted Amended
- -
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
- -
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
13.00 13.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
38.00 38.00
0.50 0.50
- -
0.24 0.24
-
- -
0.74 0.74
- -
38.74 38.74
- -
114.11 114.11
2004-2005
Adopted
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
13.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
38.00
0.75
-
-
0.75
-
38.75
-
113.12
2003-2004
Adopted
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
WQCP & STORMWATER
.00
.00
.00
2.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
.00
Superintendent 01 Water Quality
Assistant WQCP Superintendent
Laboratory Supervisor
Chemist
Technical Services Supervisor
Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector
Environmental Compliance Inspector
Plant Mechanic II (Plant Mechanic)
Plant Mechanic I (Assistant Plant Mechanic)
Plant Electrician II (Plant Electrician)
Plant Electrician I (Assistant Plant Electrician)
Apprentice Operator I
Operator II
Lead WQCP Mechanic
Utility Worker
Administrative Assistant
Ollice Specialist
M355
M465
M220
0120
M450
0160
0155
0135
0130
0140
0105
0100
0150
0160
0125
0315
A295
,
......
~
\0
I
36.00
0.19
Laboratory C
Administrative Assistant
WQCP Consultant
Office Assistant
Part 17me Hourly Posillons
hem/st
X545
Xl10
X570
X440
.00
1.19
Subtotal for Part-17me Positions
37.19
(WQCP not part 01 Maintenance Services until 2004-05.
WQCP Subtotal
Department Tola
2006-2007
Proposed
-
406.95
70.13
-
477.08
2005-2006,
Adopted Amended
401.55
70.50
401.55
70.50
472.05
472.05
2004-2005
Adopted
-
405.05
70.26
-
475.31
2003-2004
Adopted
-
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.48
12.48
431.35
77.83
-
509.18
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED POSITIONS
Old Public Works - Engineering
Director of Public Works
Senior Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Associate Engineer
Engineering Technician
Construction Manager
Development Review Coordinator
Administrative Assistant I
Administrative Assistant II
Office Specialist
Environmental Compliance Inspector
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
CIP Project Engineer (Part-time)
N160
M340
M120
M115
A167
M690
Ml0
0315
0310
A295
0155
M450
X342
I
~
Ul
o
I
Total City:
Total Full Time
Total Part Time Hourly
GRAND TOTAL
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
Cumulative
Change
(Total Frozen
Positions)
2006-07
Proposed
2005-06
Adopted
mpacted Positions
2004-05
Adopted
2003-04
Amended
2003-04
Adopted
2002-03
Amended
SUMMARY OF FROZEN POSITIONS
of the budget process
The following positions have been frozen as part
0.57
(1.00)
(0.43)
.07
0.50
.00
Positions
Office Specialist (Part-time)
Office Specialist (Full-time)
Department
City Clerk
(1.00)
0.80
1.00
Community Outreach
Director of
City Manager
(0.20)
( 1.00)
(1.00)
( 1.00)
(3.00)
0.81
.01
.00
.00
3.00
Part-Time and Contract Staff (net)
Support Coordinator
Information Technology Manager
PC Technician
Human Resources
Information Tech
2.60
I
.....
V1
.....
I
2.00
(1.00)
( 1.00)
( 1.00)
(2.00)
.00
.00
2.00
.00
II
Associate Planner
Assistant Building Official
Accounting Technician
Finance
E&CD
( 1.00)
(3.00)
( 1.00)
(1.00)
(1.00)
(7.00)
.00
.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
.00
Officer
Senior Code Enforcement
Fire Inspector II
Administrative Assistant
BaUalion Chief
Management Analyst
II
Fire
(5.74)
16.15
17.09
18.69
21.89
II
Part-Time Hours (as FTEs)
Library
OPERATING BUDGET, 2006-07
Cumulative
Change
2006-07
Proposed
2005-06
Adopted
~pacted Position..!
2003-04 2003-04 2004-05
Adopted Amended Adopted
2002-03
Amended
SUMMARY OF FROZEN POSITIONS
(T olal Frozen
Positions)
(1.00)
(2.00)
( 1.00)
(7.10)
(11.10)
3.00
47.23
5.00
46.42
.00
7.00
4.00
54.33
Superintendent of Recr!3ation
Pre-SchoolTeacher
Community Services Site Coordinator
Part-Time Hours (as FTEs)
Recreation
(1.00)
( 1.00)
(0.60)
9.20
46.00
49.82
51.47
4.00
4.00
8.80
5.00
5.00
9.80
46.00
Police Services Technician
Police Records Specialist
Communications Dispatcher *
Police Officer
Pollee
(2.60)
( 1.00)
(1.00)
( 1.00)
(1.00)
(0.48)
43.00
.00
.00
2.00
.00
.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
0.48
City Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Director of Public Works
Engineering
I
.......
U1
N
I
Senior Enginee
Development Review Coordinator
Part-Time CIP Project Engineer
move Engineering staff to ECD
(4.48)
(1.00)
(1.00)
(1.00)
(4.00)
( 1.00)
( 1.00)
( 1.00)
(1.00)
( 1.00)
(12.00)
(49.55)
5.50
11.00
8.00
7.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
14.00
10.00
2.00
.00
9.00
4.00
15.00
11.00
4.00
5.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
(formerly Maintenance Services)
Building Maintenance Custodian
Equipment Mechanic
Parks Maintenance Worker
Public Works
Public Works Maintenance Worker
Lead PW Maintenance Worker
Senior PW Maintenance Worker
Senior Electrical Technician
Groundsperson
Equipment Operator
4.40
(2.06)
of Fire Dispatch Services to County Fire Dispatch.
(23.03)
(9.65)
(20.21 )
.0 Dispatcher position eliminated with shift
TOTAL FROZEN POSITIONS
Not countinQ
-
G
~ . ~~\
c C"'i
:>< ~
~ C")
v c
~~ Staff Re120rt
AGENDA ITEM #13 B
DATE:
June 14, 2006
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Jim Steele, Director of Finance
SUBJECT:
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE REVISIONS FOR 2006-07
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution modifying certain sections of the
Master Fee Schedule for the 2006-07 fiscal year.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
Annually, staff reviews existing fees and charges as part of the budget development process. The following
modifications to the Master Fee Schedule are recommended to cover increased or previously unidentified
costs to the City, to eliminate discontinued fees, or to make fees or services clearer.
City Clerk
Deletion of service that provides the various California Administrative Codes to the public is recommended.
The Administrative Codes (Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Fire, and Administrative) are not
City publications and have not been requested by the public in recent years, but are still available in the
library for reference. In addition, three minor new fees are proposed to match what other cities are currently
charging for the services. Please see Exhibit A for a complete list.
Library
Deletion of the current $1.00 fee for the rental ofDVDs is recommended, along with other minor changes.
Please see Exhibit B.
Planning Division
The Planning Division is proposing three new fees to recover the cost of processing Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) Plans, which are expected to become more common in the future.
In addition, Planning Staff requests changes to miscellaneous minor fees including duplication of Planning
Commission meeting videos and completion of Zoning Verification letters in order to recoup the cost of
associated time and materials. Please see Exhibit C.
Staff Report
Subject: Fee Schedule Changes
June 14, 2006
Page 2 of2
Building Division
Increase of hourly rates to more accurately reflect the cost of inspectors' time. Please see Exhibit D.
Police Department
Increase in some fees to match increased costs, and addition of new fees for digital photo disks and DVDs.
Please see Exhibit E.
Fire Department
It is recommended that the fee items in the Fire Service Ambulance Transportation section of the Master Fee
Schedule be modified, due to changes in the way Medicare and Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO's)
now reimburse for standardized ambulance transportation services.
In addition, it is recommended that inspection fees for occupancies of between three (3) and twelve (12)
units in the Other Fire Prevention Inspections be increased to reflect the actual cost of inspections. Finally, it
is recommended that a vehicle abatement fee on private property be placed in the Miscellaneous Fire
Prevention Fees section of the Master Fee Schedule. The amount of the vehicle abatement fee would be
$300 and would be consistent with the fee for abatement of vehicles on public property that the Police
Department charges. Additional fees are listed for vehicle storage, etc. Please see Exhibit F for a complete
list.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
Revenues in the proposed 2006-07 budget reflect fee changes shown in this staff report.
CONCLUSION:
Fee increases are recommended to maintain cost recovery.
BY:~
Jim ~eele
Director of Finance
Approved:
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F
IN/JS/BN/ed
RESOLUTION NO._
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFIED FEES AND
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE TO INCORPORATE THOSE FEES
WHEREAS, staff recommends modification to the Master Fee Schedule for 2006-07
fiscal year as set forth in the staff report and Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, and F'; and
WHEREAS, the fees reflect the reasonable costs of providing the subject services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the Master Fee Schedule as modified to include
those fee amendments specified in the staff report and attached exhibits hereto.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Exhibit A - Changes to City Clerk Department Fees for 2006-07
Under Chapter 1, City Clerk, "Agendas, Transcripts, Administrative Codes",
DELETE
All Administrative Codes.
Foos fo,'" tho fo!!o'll/ng Codos inskJdo 20% addod to tho basic cost. F.fJOS do not klc.'.fJdo
postago. FDDS WOrD aoopted on _'.fJnD 28, 2000 jR RDSo!EJtion 1177 00, EJn!Dss noted
othD.'W/SO.
2001 California l\dmini8trativo Code *
$32.<10 each.
2001 C::lIifornia Building Code Vol. 1 *
$122.31 each.
2001 California Building Code Vol. 2 *
$136.50 each.
2001 California Electric Codo *
$89.<10 eaoh
$78.60 eaoh.
2001 California Meohanical Code *
2001 California Plumbing Code *
$108.00 eaoh.
1998 California Fire Code Vol. 1 *
$78.90 each.
1997 Uniform Fire Codo Vol. 2 *
$97.38 each.
.,.
1997 Uniform Houdng Code '.'01. 2 *
$11.94 each
1997 Uniform Code for the abatement
ef
Dangerous Buildings
$11.91 each
* with auto updates
Under "Other Fees",
ADD Candidates Election Manual $50.00
(for non-candidates, persons who fail to file nomination papers,
or withdraw candidacy.)
Duplication of video tapes onto DVDs
$10.00
Preparing proof of residence letters or notarizing
proof of living documents
$10.00
Exhibit B - Chanaes to Library Department Fees for 2006-07
CHAPTER 2 Revisions 2006/2007 Budget
By Resolution of the Library Board of Trustees
Changes approved at the March 28, 2006 Library Board meeting
Materials Checkout Fee
DELETE
DVDs Foature Films, Tolevision
SerieE:
(fiotional), Litorary ProductionE:
$1.00 por item, colleoted at chookout
(per prior direction to staff, Library
Board recommendation is to
eliminate this fee)
[Juno 9, 2004 R:53 04]
Fines for Overdue Materials
DELETE
Engraver
$1.00 daily' $10.00 maximum per item
[Juno 26, 2002 R:63 02]
Supplies and Charges set by the Friends of the Library
INCREASE
Sharpeners
$3.00 each. (was $1.00)
Lost, Replacement Charges
ADD
Read-Aloud Kit Bags
$1.00 each
Miscellaneous Charges
REWORD
Reserve - PLS Inter-Library Loan
$0.75 per itemlbarcode charged at
time of placement. [June 22, 2005
R:72-2005]
(was "collected at the time of pickup")
Use of reservable two-hour computer
stations for word processing, etc.
(was "Use of PC 'multipurpose' word-
processing, spreadsheet, etc. stations")
$5.00 for each two hours or portion
thereof. [June 9, 2004; R: 53-2004]
Staff Research - General Research
requests, including local History Research
and site surveys.
(was "Staff Research - History Room,
including site surveys.")
$40.00 per hour or portion thereof.
[June 9, 2004; R: 53-2004]
Exhibit C - Chanaes to Plannina Division Fees for 2006-07
Economic & Community Development Department
Planning Division
NEW FEES
Public Hearing Cases
Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) Plan
Initial Filing Fee
$200.00
Annual Monitoring
$150.00 plus survey cost
Tri-annual
Consultant costs, plus 15% or
$500.00, whichever is greater
Miscellaneous
Duplication of Planning Commission
Meeting video
$20.00 or at cost, whichever is greater
Zoning Verification Letter
$100.00
Maps
Zoning Map
$6.00
2-:00
Exhibit D - Changes to Buildina Division Fees for 2006-07
Economic & Community Development Department
Building Inspection Division
REVISED FEES FOR ALL OTHER INSPECTIONS OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, AND ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW
Inspections outside normal business
Hours; Re-inspection fees assessed
under provisions of Section 305(g);
Inspections for which a fee is not
specifically indicated.
$75.00 $50.00 hourly; two-hour
minimum.
[June 28,2000; R:77-00]
Additional plan review required by
changes, additions or revisions
to approved plans.
$75.00 $50.00 hourly.
[June 28,2000; R:77-00]
Exhibit E - Chanaes to Police Department Fees for 2006-07
Police Department
Permits
Unless noted otherwise, all fees were adopted on June 27, 1990 in Resolution
#95-90.
REVISED FEES
Cardroom I.D. Card (SSFMC Ch.
6.36)
Fees are for each individual listed.
Fees may be waived if the applicant
provides a copy of the California
Department of Justice gaming
application background.
Operator
Employee
$750.00 $500.00
$125.00 $50.00
$25.00 $10.00
[June 28, 2000; R:77-00]
Replacement
Dance Hall Permit (SSFMC Ch. 6.48)
$150.00 $100.00 for each application.
[February 26, 1992; R:16-92]
Massage Establishment or Bath
House
(SSFMC Ch. 10.16)
Initial Permit
Annual Renewal
$750.00 $500.00 per individual.
$125.00 $~ per individual
[July 13, 1994; R:95-94]
Massage Practitioner
Initial Permit
$250.00 $150.00 for each individual
listed.
$125.00 $75,00 per individual
[July 13, 1994; R:95-94]
Annual Renewal
Pawnbroker/Secondhand Goods
Background Investigation
(SSFMC Ch. 6.92)
Dealer
$750.00 $500.00 for each application.
Fortune Telling (SSFMC Ch. 6.80)
$750.00 $500.00 for each application.
Photographs
Unless noted otherwise, all fees were adopted on June 27, 1990 in Resolution #95-90.
Digital Photographs on disks
$25.00 per disk (includes all
photographs related to incident)
Miscellaneous Fees
DVDNideo Copy
$40.00 for each copy.
Emergency response to Driving Under
the Influence (DUI) accidents
Actual wages plus 50% 4Q..%.
overhead.
[June 24, 1992; R:69-92]
NEW FEE
DVDNideo Copy
$40.00 for each copy.
Exhibit F - Chanaes to Fire Department Fees for 2006-07
NEW AND REVISED FEES
Fire Department
EMS Division
Fire Service Ambulance Transportation
Note - Changes in Medicare billing requirements will cause the restructuring of
the fees as shown below.
Resident ALS II *
$1035.00
New fee
Resident BLS, 911 Ambulance
$835.00
New Fee
Resident BLS, Non-Emergency
Ambulance
$385.00
Same Fee, service re-defined
Non-Resident ALS II *
$1163.14
New fee
Oxygen and Apparatus
$100.00
currently $87.83 per use
Respiratory Equipment
· Oral intubation
· Nasal intubation
· Oral airways
· Nasal airways
· Suction catheter
· V-Vac cartridge
· Easy CAP C02
. BAAM Whistle
$60.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
Combitube Airway
$90.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
* ALS II is a higher level of Advanced Life Support service than standard ALS, and
has a higher level of Medicare reimbursement. In ALS II, paramedic personnel
provide more services to transport patients.
Cardiovascular Items
. EKG monitor
· 12 Lead EKG monitor
. EKG electrodes
. Defibrillator pads
. Uni-Iead pads
$125.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
Life Band (Autopulse)
$175.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
IV/Lock Appliances (Set up, etc.)
· Normal saline solution
· Sharps container
· Intraosseous needle
$40.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
ALS Intervention/No Transport
· IV, EKG monitor, medications,
ice packs, bandages
$125.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
Misc. Ambulance Supplies
· Dressings
· Trauma dressing
· Bandage (roller)
· Splints
· Triangular bandage
· Cold/heat packs
· Burn blanket
· Saline/sterile water irrigation
· Spider straps
· Obstetrical kit
$30.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
C-Spine
· C-collar
· C-spine head bed
$80.00 (Flat Rate)
Currently 150% of actual cost
Medications
One time only regardless number
of medications administered
· Activated charcoal
· Adenosine
· Albuterol/Alupent
· Aspirin
. Atropine
$60.00 (Flat Rate)
. Benadryl
. Calcium Chloride
. Nasal Tube Medication
. Dextrose 25%
. Dextrose 50%
. Dopamine
. Epinephrine 1: 1000
. Epinephrine 1: 1 0,000
. Glucagon
. Glucopaste
. Glucose drink
. Lasix
. Lidocaine
. Morphine Sulfate
. Narcan
. Nitroglycerine
. Sodium Bicarbonate
. Versed
. Xylocaine Jelly
. Other Med used for patient
Currently 150% of actual cost
Other Fire Prevention Inspections
Group R, Division 1 and 3
occupancies (four or more units)
$10.00 for each living unit-
minimum charge $125.00
Currently same charge without
minimum
Miscellaneous Fire Prevention Fees
Vehicle Abatement
$300.00
New fee
Vehicle storage (less than 20 feet in
length)
$60.00 per calendar day
New fee
-
Xl't \\ S:1#
.
g . ~~\
o ("l
>< -\
t:i ;q J
v 0
~lIFO"~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #13 C
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 14,2006
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Capital Improvement
Program for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and also approving plans and specifications for projects under
this program which are approved to be advertised for construction bids.
BACKGROUND/DISCDSSION
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) outlines the infrastructure improvements throughout the
community. The program is the result of collaboration among various departments outlining the needed
improvements and the priority for implementation of these projects. The CIP continues improvement of
the City streets, storm drains, traffic, sanitary sewers, facilities and parks. The program funding will only
include this fiscal year. Projects in future years will be appropriated in future budget cycles. The
Planning Commission has reviewed this program and has adopted a resolution finding the CIP consistent
with the General Plan. The total CIP budget for this fiscal year, including prior appropriation, will be
$92,309,700.
New Projects for this year include, but are not limited to:
. Annual Street Resurfacing Program
. Slurry sealing of various City streets
. BART Linear Park
. Wet Weather Program
. Fire Station No. 61 Training Tower
Staff Report
Subject: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
Page 2 of 2
Upon adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, Council is also approving the plans and
specifications for projects within this program and authorizing the solicitation of construction bids.
FUNDING
The total CIP budget for this fiscal year will be $92,309,700 of which $23,435,700 is in prior year
appropriation and $68,874,00 is in new appropriation. The new appropriation of $68,874,000 will
consist of:
. Capital Improvement (General Fund)
. Grants
. Redevelopment (Tax Increment)
. Bonds
. Developer Fees
. Gas Tax
. Measure A
. Sewer Fund
. Other*
$ 1,375,000
$ 2,832,000
$ 14,206,000
$ 39,192,000
$ 6,911,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 606,000
$ 1,552,000
TOTAL
$ 68,874,000
*Other Funding consists of Common Greens Funds, Traffic Impact Fee, and private contributions.
Bya~~
Marty Van Duyn
Assistant City Manager
Approved:
Attachments: Resolution
FY 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Program
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby
authorizes approval of the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and also approve plans, specifications and
construction advertising for projects under the program.
WHEREAS, the total CIP budget for this fiscal year will
appropriation and $ 68,874,000 is in new appropriation
be $ 92,309,700 of
WHEREAS, upon adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, Council
for projects within this program and authorizing the solicitation of construction bids;
which $ 23,435,700
is also approving the plans and
and
IS
III
pnor year
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this program and found it consistent
The total CIP budget for this fiscal year, including prior appropriations, will be $ 92,309,700 and
specifications
WHEREAS, the program funding will only include
appropriated in future budget cycles; and
with the City's
General Plan
fiscal year 2006-2007
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Council approve the Capital Improvement Program for
2006-2007 and also approve plans, specifications and construction advertising for projects under the program; and
and the projects
in the future
years will be
Fiscal Year
A RESOLUTION AlITHORIZING APPROVAL OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2006-2007 AND ALSO APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION ADVERTISING
FOR PROTECTS UNDER THIS PROGRAM
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO
City Clerk
ATTEST:
/s/ S
ABSENT
ABST AIN
NOES
AYES
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council
Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June 2006 by the following vote:
of the City of South San
o
U
r:/J.
~
U
~
~
~
r:/J.
~
~
~
o
r:/J.
~
o
~
~
~
u
~
d
o
~
~
E-1
Z
\ , ~
~t'-IQ
>og
O~~
~ I "'
~ ~ ~ ~
~~~
\"1\ ~ ~ :::5
\,.\ <~~
. -1 E-1
'\ ~
\' ~
I <
\ , U
\ ~
\ ~
\ ~
~
~
~
~
,f'\
~[
~t.o<... ';...
' ~~i'i
I
,.
! m ')
\
j I
PAGE
1
2
3
4-27
28
SEE TABS
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
SUMMARIES: APPROPRIATION CHARTS
APPROPRIATION TABLES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NOTES
PROGRAM DETAIL: STREETS
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
STORM DRAINS
SANITARY SEWERS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
PARKS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
RESOLUTION NO. 2653-2006
RESOLUTION OF TilE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING TIIAT THE PROPOSED
2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS CONSISTENT
WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN
the Capital
the State of California Planning and Zoning Law requires the Planning Commission to review
each year and make a determination that it is consistent with the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS
Improvement Program
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Capital Improvement Program at its regular meeting held on June
2006, and finds it consistent with all applicable City goals, objectives, policies and programs for the General Plan
IS
Francisco that it hereby has
San Francisco General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning commission of the City of South San
determined that the Proposed Capital Improvement Program for 2006-2007 is consistent with the South
*
*
*
*
*
*
AYES
lia
Commissioner Romero. Commissioner Sim and Commissioner Te
Commissioner Prout
Commissioner Giusti
None
NOES
ABSTAIN: None
2
~}
etary to the Planning Commission
ATTEST
None
ABSENT
RESOLUTION NO
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FO R FISCAL
ADVERTISING
PROGRAM
C()NSTRIJCTION
MPROVEMEN'l
AND
THE CAPITAL I
SPECIFICATI()NS
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF
YEAR 2006-2007 AND ALSO APPROVING PLANS
FOR PROJECTS UNDER THIS PROGRAM
Fiscal Year
lor
Program
mprovemcnl
approvc thc Capilal I
advcltising for pr~jccls
Counci
Cily
thc
lhal
rccommcnded
s
WHEREAS
2006-2007
be
ycars will
;m(
the fulure
program
projects
under thc
lhe
;md
200(j-2007
year
construction
fiscal
inclUdc
spccilic;uions and
ollly
wil
funding
thc program
budget cycles
plans
approvc
and also
WHEREAS
PIal
General
Citys
lhc
n
WI
consistcnt
il
found
and
be $
and
has reVlcwe( s progr;un
including prior approprialions, wil
Commission
Planning
this fiscal yeal
c
fulurc
WHEREAS
The lolal CIP budget
approprialcd in
s
spccilicalio
111(
plans
Ie
19
700 and
pprov
uso
92,a09
s
Counc
I
construclion
Progra
III provclIlc
solicilalion
01 UIC Ca
authorizing lhe
for
p(
program
Hl(
WIIEHEAS
700
,;t.;'J5
$ 2:
whic
and
o
700
bids
92,809
$
bc
WI
o
ycar
lisca
s
for
budget
ICW
and
CIP
OIal
IC
lhis
WHEREAS
lor projects wil
yca
Cily Council hcrcby
specifications and
pnor
s
IC
plallS
that
approvc
San Fr;Ulcisco
also
;Uld
Council 01 IC City 01 Soutl
for Fiscal Y C;U" 2006-2007
1})I>ro})nau()
Cily
Program
program
thc
Improvcmenl
prqjects
by
undcr thc
RESOLVED
n
Capilal
6~U~71.,000 is
IT
BE
aulhorizes approval of lhc
conslruction advcrtising I<:>r
THEREFORE
$
an(
on
appropna
N O\V
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
of the City of South San
the City Counc
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June 2006 by the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT:
Ci
/s! S
ATTEST:
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
FY 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Amount % of Total
-
$1,375,000 2.0%
$2,832,000 4.1%
$14,206,000 20.6%
$39,192,000 56.9%
$6,911,000 0.0%
$1,000,000 1.5%
$1,200,000 1.7%
$606,000 0.9%
$1,552,000 2.3%
-
))
3
Amount % of Total
$3,268,000 4.7%
$8,520,000 12.4%
$7,368,000 10.7%
$42,612,000 61.9%
$4,324,000 6.3%
$467,000 0.7%
$1,315,000 1.9%
$1,000,000 1.5%
$68,814,000 100%
I ProJect Typl
Amount % of Total
$6,357,000 6.9%
$8,897,000 9.6%
$12,661,000 13.7%
$53,240,000 57.7%
$6,718,900 7.3%
$1,749,800 1.9%
$1,436,000 1.6%
$1,250,000 1.4%
$QglaQ9IlO'Q!c! .'lQO~
for FY 2006-07 plus estimated
riatlol1 B
Capital Improvement (General Fund)
Grants
Redevelopment (Tax Increment
Bonds
Developer Fees
Gas Tax
Measure A
Sewer Fund
Other
Streets
Storm Drains
Sanitary Sewer
Public Facilities
Parks
Traffic
Information Technology
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program
~,~~!;~\;!~iZi:;Total. :2006-2007:
.~Total:Approprlatlon
Streets
Storm Drains
Sanitary Sewer
Public Facilities
Parks
Traffic
Information Technology
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program
Total Appropriation includes new appropriation
carryover available fundfng from prior years
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2006-2007
STREETS ____________~-'--
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM . _ _, _ 25,000 L
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM _
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION _____
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
~~-_.~_...__._-- ----_.---- .--."--- _.-
~!lE'END~LE AVENUE REH~llITA.!IQf'J______
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS ____
HUNTIf'J.GTON AVE RESURFACING PRO~____
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2007
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007 _~_
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
G
Developer
Fees
N
D
Bonds!
Loans
FUN
---'--~~'-'--r--------'--~
Capltallmpr. Redevelopment
(General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment)
Total
Other
Storm
Water
E
Sewer
Enterprise
C
R
Measure A
U
o
S
Gas Tax
PROJECT NAME
50,000
~o:ooo'- 40,000
---
,___~ !(),0Q!l_
- t -
---._------ -"-~~
_ 15(),ooQ____20_0,000
---
~,OOO
----
'-'~---
2.60,000
---
-
- - -
~-+___: -I _-:-----:-- -: 1--
. 260,000 -
20,000
,558,000
-~--~----
8oo~000
65,000
-~-- --:~~+==~
--
20,000
824,000
50,000
65,000
149,000
--=---~50ROO
--
=B== -
-, -~.,+----
- -
----~
--
-'-~--
$,
-~ '----
---
---
----- -
-----
- -
585,000
500,000
25,000
125,000
40.0001 . - 3,268.000
--,
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING----I-----------:--
~-
_~500,000_
20,000
__ '_'____________n___
_;'," 8,520,000
:---+------:-.--
---
.
-
-2.0,600F~--
---~+---_.
_~()(),goo
STORM DRAINS ________________
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
lINDENVILLE STORM UPGRADE _
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR _ I
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENT A TlON
---------...-...----.----.---.-.-- -- --
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
'-
50,000
4,500,000
50,000
20,000
00,000
75,000
4
10,000
'"
-
+-
- ---~
- -
-~,-
40,000
50,000
20,000
1oo,0<J(J
75,000
__!"'5QIlJlOO ._~____,.:~,
4,500,000
-
-,
---
-~
---- ~
SANITARY SEWER _
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER _
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR, WW, PH IV- B & C _
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR, WW, PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
lINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV,
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA" WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPR~_,----- __
~
PUBLIC FACILITIES ~
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENT~~~ -==-- ~J -
ElI9-Y.fLr=J:,OCKER~~~tlAll~ROGRA~______~_ _ __ _~__
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 7,000.
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ ~~,O()O+-_ ~
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION -_________L .
CITY.WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY
DAY CARE FACILITY __._
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL .I UPGRADE ..____._
FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE / GATES REPLACEMENT
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT ~__
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN ~_
QRANGE~RK RECR_E..~TIQN BlJ.II,D-'-r-.lQ________ _____
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
-------------_._._-~--- --~._-_._-- - -. -
OYSTE~.!'.Q_'!lI_!>1i\BII'~A_REM.EPI~~QN .. ._________._ __.
~~IING OJ'_gI~lJILDII'_J~__.__~___ .._ _~._
Puc_~r:.m ACQUISI,.I.9!!.._~___ __ ___.____
BOA MISCEL~r-.l_~_l!..S"y\ND AC_~U.I!'I!IOI'-J......."___. __.._
REROQF WESTBORQUGH BECREATION BUILDlf\I~ ____On
.B.OOF.INSTALLATION.___~____~~_____
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS ____~__
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH L1NQE.N_A\I~____
TRAIN STATION _~_____
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
-:""'>'0'}; "::,W:.,:\:
Total
~_2,i7.3,000
Other
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2006-2007
F U N 0 I N G S 0 U R C E
Capltallmpr. --,---- r-- "m._ ,-- ----- T------''--r--- I Storm
Redevelopment Bonds! Developer Sewer
(General Fund) Grants (Tax Increment) Loans Fees Gas Tax Measure A Enterprise Water
_-273,0OQ.
2,573,000
PROJECT NAME
\','i\!EFl..9UAI,I,TY S;()N!BQ~~N! ,=-Xf'Af'iSIOf'-! _ _+
WET WEATHER, PH 1'--______
WINSTON.MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR. WW, PH "
,%~t*;:1--:;<i%L4f}..fP::\i;5
~.
--~ ~
_' 25,000
_------=-- 50,()OO
285,000
6,000
~O
6,()OO
-
~-
-
---1-----
--=-+---:-+~,ooo
2,500,000
500,000_
~__ ~ 1!J,,<XJO
____!.6-'--OOO-'-()(JO i
-~~
. ___ _ 5.Q,()()Q
_. 22cOOQ,000
---
__:!.3.c()()()_
-~l --.!,~::
~----
42.612,000
---
~-
..---.--
-'--'-'----
-~ .__._---~----
-~-----
-
-_..~-,~
--.-
---
25,000
--
---r
---=--_.1
-.
_.
~t-~T .
. . .
--- ._~- -...--
. . .
----. ---- -...,---
. . .
419,000 "C ,6.000 6,()()O
-. :---1--
--
~.
---
_.,-
500,000
~J6~00(),~oO~~ ._4.1.9~QQO'
--- '.-. --...... --J-."'--.-.. -..-
_ _ _ 1 0,3tl_1,QC)()_ ...1..1.61 !lcOQQ.
1,000,000
-'-~-----10:~00 r
----
2,500,000
---_._~-
--".
------
~~--
n_._
----.
50,000 50,000
- 50,000
150,000 150,000
25,000 25,000
60,000 60,000
75,000 75,000
75,000 75,000
~
~ooo.
29,000
1.433,000
5
.~
---
-
-_..
--
--.--
~'--
-
-
---
- ~-
-- -
~,-- ----
------
------.
--~ ~-
-.. :-.
-
_ .13,891.~._~8,11~.000
'--_.~
-
- ~ -.
- -
- -
_50,000 --- ---
--- ~-- -
-. - -.-
--- -'-~
---~-OQ .~-
___?9,()()() ~
_---....1.433,9.QO_ -.-
.----- ----
___~ 14l1...0ll0
PARKS_~___~__.
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPAOVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS_
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
--------~-----
!-INEA~ PARK TRA~HAS,=--,,-~____...___
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LI""E VAL_UE R..Ef'L_
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2006-2007
U R C E
-~~~--~-~-
Sewer Storm
Enterprise Water
o
s
FUN 0 N G
---_..._--~- ----,----------
Redevelopment Bonds! Developer
(Tax Increment) Loans Fees
Total
55,000
30,()~
75,000
70,000
,987,000_
O,OOQ
Other
-
-t---~
25,000
---
Measure A
~~_:-
------=----S
- -
- -
------
- -
70,000
-
---
Gas Tax
--
-- ___ 5,000.
'i_=:- -=1d! ~=-E
. -c - ~~J=
1.572.000
Grants
---':_~?-,oool=___
Impr.
Fund)
PROJECT NAME
9RAN~E PARK BALLFIELD '3EPLACE/;1E!'!T____
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL _ _
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIEL~
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER '{AN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER / BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELD IRRIGATION
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
Capital
(General
------l------~-
+
_ 35,000
--
--
80,000
--
---=E
- -
--
--
-------=----+-----=-
-
-
----.
----- ~-
--------
- -
35,000
80,000
--
--
----=-----I-
---=------1-
~
----=----1=--
- -
---
--
--
--
1-
---:-----t----~-
~--t-----------.
.----
--
-- -- 125,000 I
-
TRAFFIC
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORElAIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PED~STRAIN UNITS______
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRANQ!\.'{E_________ ____ _ ___
DUBUQUE AVE /OYSTER POINU!LVD___________ _
ECCLES AVE & g~~!!=.'3 PqiNT ~~i:J _ __ ______n
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
EL CAMINO REALI HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DR/MISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ___
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRAND / EAST CRAND
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL _________
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD _______
HARBOR WAY ______
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT __
HIGHWAY 101/ PRODUCE SIGNAL __
KING DR/JUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM __
SIGN INVENTORY _ __
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP ___
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDIMITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD__
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS RD INTERSECTN
-- - -
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDIUTAH AVE' ____________
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
m
-
~l
_:_ .:!Q2,000 302,000
--1- ----------
____ 50,.000
-- ~--50,OOO
6
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
NEW APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
FY 2006-2007
~-~
Sewer
______- _ _ Measure A Enterprise
_______290,000~--:=--.:-- - -- -- ~- ~
. u.._ [J~ .. I. .. ~E u_ ~m~ - ..~:~l':I
290.000
-~
Storm
Water
R
u
o
~--
s
Gas Tax
N G
Developer
Fees
D
Bonds!
Loans
N
-----...-
F U
--"-_.~--~
Redevelopmen
(Tax Increment
-...j
-~
Grants
Capltallmpr.
(General Fund)
--
-=--+--
PROJECT NAME
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) __~.__
F1NAr::!QIAL I HUMAN RESOURc:ES SOFT.I^0BE._ _.. .___
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHA.~
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE II .~__
.I:.~~Ml...TD.NG PR()J_~~I,_f3.~_[)_...__ __
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
~-~-~,._--_._---~--_._-----
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE ____
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
ij~_.,j0'it()tA1:INFORMAooN teCHNOLOGY _~__
290.000 I
135.000 I
~ ~~
.- -1.000.000
;;r;;;~~~~
7
-
-
_.
----..---
-
-
1,000,000
____":1.000.000
.
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM IANIPl
PHASE XVIII
41'.111) ;',:;,< ':
GRAND T.
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2006-2007 Appropriations
E
Sewer
Enterprise
C
U R
--
o
s
FUN D N G
cap'tallmp;::-I~-------rRedevelopmenll-'- Bond~-r-Developer
(General Fund) (Tax Increment) Loans Fees
2,120,000
~OOO
57,000
65,000
19,000
'_ 1,928,000
280,~
800,000
-- -----
61,000
225,000
'. M,OOO
----sto;:m---.---------------r---~~
Water Other
Total
=-ilo,~f=__u_:~~1
~QOO
610,000
-----
:-1
----.:.---I--~--
200,000
--
--
22,000
50,000
19,000
1,194,000
280,000 -
150,0Q()
~-~
Measure A
:-=--_r=- 5o,6oQ
_ r _
225,000
50,000-+-
10,000
7,000
65,000
149,000
50,000
Gas Tax
PROJECT NAME
STREETS _._____~_____ ___._m__ _ _
'"'""" ""'w"",, "^"'''-''''"'^' ~ ~. -- -I~ - ~-'~'l'OOf
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM _ _ __ _:__ _
r~~~n~~~~~~~_...~._~- -;~=-."ij~-=-:... ... I _~q~
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION ___~ _.---=- ~ __-----=----- _ ~_ _ ~__
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS ____
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ __
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION ,
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE ~
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATIOfli
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2007
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007
US 101 FLYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE _~_
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
:s'
--+==
- -
~-----=- ~
-----=--+----
----~---
----
__2,120,0.00
---
-----~--
----- ..._---
-- -~
585,000 _ _
- -
--- -'- -
5QO,000 ____ - ____
:~ .--.-------=- -'-.-
61,00Q..
_~2~,()00
Grants
--
321,000
,-
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
~,_'OTAL~RAllJ:l~~ CRQ~~!NGS .. '~_____
__Z~()()()
___ 55,0llll..
~-~.
~500,00Q.
119,000
75,000
73.000
~::--==---=i55:~
..: ---- - 50,000
-i.,~ooo, - -'-I-:...~ 00.000 ~ ~. _.:::_~: __ ".000
- 73,000 ~j>('fcY+125 000
't((: 128,000 . <C- . ..C.- .. _. ,
---
75,()OO
-<-I
------
-.- ----
--
. .
-~ -- -----=---+----------=-
--
STORM DRAINS ~__ _ __. _
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
-'" -_.._- "--'-._'--'--' ..--- . -.-- .
AVALON DRIVE STORM ~F1""It-I______ _ ___~_
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
--~_._~-_._._.__._------------ ----,._--
L1NDENVILLE STORM UPGRADE
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN R~PAIR____
STORM DRAIN MilSTER PLA!J.I.!~PLEMENTATIOf:J.__
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
'AIllSfOAMbAAlNSr;\'!>;" -
20,00Q
~O,ooo_
4,500,000
50,000
116,000
20,000
30,000
100,000
7
_~--+-----.!Q,OOO+--
78,000
~,OOO
40,000
50,000
20,000
30,0llQ
100,000
144,000
-
- -..~
f ~-
· ~ooo _ - .. ~ -- 1= '~ooo
. 8,600,000
SANITARY SEWER
"A' STREET SANITARY SEWER ____
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., WW, PH IV- B & C
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR. WW, PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
L1NDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITAR'fSEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP ST A., WW,
SEWER PIPE LINING
PH
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2006-2007 Appropriations
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMEN~_ .__.___
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRA~__~_ ~_~
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY 7,000
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE 67,000
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY
--
DAY CARE FACILITY 3oo,~
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL.I UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT !,605,00Q
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS _ __
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,000 ====:[ .
!NSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS 7,000. _.----+__?Q,(joo
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION ---=-- 5,450,000
~ETAL E.l5TERIOR FENC.E.L~ATESREPLA_C;~~~-r__...__~
MSB WALL LEAKS .__.____ ._ .m_~O()
NEW CITY PARKING LOT .._~___ .____.___
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS A~SESSMNT & BLDC; PLAN._~__
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSIO~~ND AgQUISITI~_ . ______~__
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
._---_._~~_.._._- -'--~._-
PAINT~t-lG O~C;:IT-.:.s..uJlpJNGS. . __ _ _ ~.. __ 5.0,000
PUC LAND ACQUISITION
-~---~--- _._..._..~-----_._------_._--_.,.-
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
ROOF INSTALLATION
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS
- ---
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVE..........-._
TRAIN STATION___~~_~____.._
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
i\~"'l~!lt1tOT~L~lI~~~~I.IfIES"'f,..' i'-___.
NO NG SOURCE
-~--,--
Bonds! Developer Storm
Loans Fees . Gas T~,. Measu.re A Water Other... T...o.l,al
..:__1_ . ~ 75000
~. 7,36.6,QQg_t=.---~~ =~-= --- - --.-.-- ===~;+__-~--J-';~~Q.
88,000
F U
Redevelopmen
(Tax Increment
Grants
--~.-
Capilallmpr.
(General Fund)
-~-
PROJECT NAME
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
----.-------------..-..- ....__._---_..~--- -- . ---------
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAJ'JT EXPl\NSION _ .__
'.VET WEATHER,.!'..f:l.II..____________ _..
WINSTON.MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR. WW, PH 1/
, ,'\,,;~' .fZft ,11;:0!TOTAL:.SANITARY SEWER:.
220,000
10,000
27,000
-:-+~5,450,000
25,000
67,000
300,000
25,000
,605,OQQ
--~_.
.~~
=--1
~_.
. ~r~
--.:......+--- -
:"--1
6,000
-~
. t . I .
._~ ---~._-
. . .
---- ~ _.~--
6,000 6,000
-
---
---
-.--
----- 2~Q,~1
38,QOO
6,000
160,000
_ 500,000 .
_ __._:J,207,000
.___,. 16,000,000
__.._.__~2!l7,ooo. _______?,~Z,Qoo
n___~ _ .. ________ _..__~,Ooo
~ ~___ m ~_~?,Qoo,()O()
_____'_ . .~___ __ 1,000,.000 J
33,000
__ , 2,200,000
.____._..!ll,000 ;
_~OOO
: 63,.240),QO(l
---.!..60,000
---.Jl.~:' ;.31,000 ,
-
---~-_._-
- ~-
----=--1
':""""1 -- ----=-- L -
---~,OOO'E
16,00Q..~~ - 434,~ ,1---
----~..
__~,OOO
_--------.!.Il..9QO
50,000
1- --------
I
___.__~!Q,QOl>__ 2,n3,ooo 20,244,000 29,119,000 . ____~,ooo
----
36,000 18,000
.-----.-.
10,381,~00 [-i1,619,000
_nu.U_m_______.._ __m ____ __________
_1,OOQ,(joo.
--.
_:TI
33,00.<J..
~-~---
54,0OQ.
50,000
50,ooq.,
67,000 167.000
25,000 25,000
60,000 60,000
75,000 ~ooo
75,000 _..J5,000
~ 28,000
50,000 , 50,000
::...... _ 50,000
. _~!,961,fl...OQ.
1 ,433,000
472000
8
50,000
-
---I---~
47,000
-~.
-
-
~-
---=----J.-..--
50,000
---
----
-~~
~~ ~ooo
50,(j00 -~.
!..~61,9()()
1,433,QQ!l
~
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE __
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
L1NEAR!,ARK TB~!:l'HASE J.I~________.
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2006-2007 Appropriations
E
Sewer
Enterprise
c
R
u
o
s
o N G
---.-.-----r-------
Bonds! Developer
Loans Fees
N
F U
----.----r-----.--..-...-.-.---
Redevelopment
(Tax Increment)
Other
----:-+-:-+ ~. 18,~-- ~~~o
.._~ 55,000
Total
Storm
Water
Measure A
Gas Tax
Grants
-----.!!l..QQ<l.
55,000
0,000
30,000
-- ~~ . 75,000
-'~-----=~~,2Q.~L- 400,000
5,000
- : -+=-~--~~,~q<:lQ.._-
---=--+~
250,000
-_._-
PROJECT NAME
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
---~
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIE~
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION...__._~__
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER / BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT ._...___.
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELD IRRIGATION
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
~._._-------~-
Capltallmpr.
(General Fund)
~,Q.oQ
25,QaO t--=.~:QQQ~,_._._._
150,000
-
-~~~1,987,000
-~--
~ooo _
1" o)i:il /VIti
550,000 l' &,718.900
-~QQ.
-~-
=- : r:~::::
45,000
80,000
50,000
20,000
302,000
ii50'000
2~~;()()Qc,'
4",_
81,000
18,800
19,00Q
35,000
28,000
-'
50,000
~ -
-+~ 19,000 l-------=-:
35,000 __.
25,000
7,455
45,000
80,000
12,545
~..Jl.l,ooo
~~E-
---
- --
46.000
--~-
~j-
------
~
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORElAIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
-~-~
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
EL CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DRlMISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAS:r GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR___
QRAND i!..A~T GRAN~____.~~._ ___ __ ____~__ ._.
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL ~___
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101/ PRODUCE SIGNAL
. .
KING DR/JUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDIMITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS RD INTERSECTN
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDIUTAH AVE
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
9
302,000
50,000
150,000
nO,455
NFORMATION TEC.HNOLOGY
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Available from Prior Years Plus FY 2006-2007 Appropriations
E
-_.------------.------~-~-
Sewer Storm
Enterprise Water Olher
C
R
u
o
_5
N G
----------.----
Developer
Fees
FUN 0
~--~developmeni~---Bo;;dsl
Grants (Tax Increment Loans
Total
_58,000
~~,Q{)()-
1,180,000
---- - --"--t---
600,000
__g(),~oo_
290,000
Measure A
Gas Tax
_______2BO,004--__
-----
Capllallmpr.
(General Fund)
58,000
__lll()oo
5,000
5,000
5,000
--~--
--.~--
-
__-.?,gO(j
PROJECT NAME
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
- -_. -- .~-_._..._----_.. .."- --..... --.-------....--.------
EiB.ER N~TWOfi'S..('..1FISL~____ ____
FINANCIAL / HUM~N RESOUR~E~ SOFTWARE _
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE"
PERMITTING PROJECT, R ~_i:!___
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
--~------~---
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
76,000
1,250,000
1,250,000
92;3(19,700
o
"fl,086,eOO
'125,000',
1,Cl57,oob
2,09lI,ooo
i ;563,645
7,086,455
1,250,000
1,250,000
8.090,900
GRANoJ6T
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
E
-~- ____~_'"-"l~~___
C
R
u
o
G
FUN 0 N
Improv!!_~~t_(~_".~~~_I_F.u..~~L__~__ ____~
10-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
~
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
260,000
Aval
Year
~-
Esl
Prlo
10-
_~Q,QQO
-.
__ ==1-= -
-:=t~~--
585,000
400,000
FY
I
400,000
_.B>,OOO
400,000
--+-
FY 09-10
~O!OQQ.j_
FY 08-09
Capital
FY 07-08
__~,QOQ.
__.__-+-~_OQ<!.+_
400,000
Est. Aval
Prior Year FY 06-07
--
~-==--~-=:-_+-25,@.
PROJECT NAME
STREETS
ANNUALSIDEWALK REPAIRPROGRAM
COMMONGREENSSiDEWALK REPAiR PROGRAM-
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJE~~__._.__
~EENDALE AVENUE REHABIIJ~!lO.N______ n
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM. 2006-2007
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007
US 101 FL YOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
ilR'ii
61,000
260,000
81,000
450,000
450,000
450,000
-------1-
450,000
0,000
t--l
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
II.I1QAD. CROSSINGS
---~
---+---
-.
-------j
----,-----1--
-===::]------
------I-~-
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT---.. n___ .---.- --
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORMORAIN
L1NDENVILLE STORM UPGRADE -----
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENTATION
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
i ~i1'OTi\L S1'Oflr.4 0l'lAIN$"" ./f;Z =
10
7"
-
.
.
38,000
-------1------
-------1~-
SANITARY SEWER
'A' STREET SANITARY SEWER
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR ..
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR., WW, PH IV. B & C
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR. WW. PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
L1NDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA., WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHI\B IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER, PH II
WINSTON-~ISC SANITARY SE\~ER REPAIR. ~W, PH ".
TOTAL SEWER
---
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
E
-----~_._-
Grants
-~---'-'
C
R
U
Avail
Year
o
s
G
N
FUN 0
--..--.--.---.----.
..____~~~~Jlj~ Improvement (~eneral!~~L__
Est. Avail
Prior Year
FY10-
---
FY 09-10
-=-=r~
FY 08-<J9
FY 07-<J8
FY 06-<J7
Est
Prior
0-
::-. 2~~~f 25,000
--?t--~-
50,000 50,000
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-<J9
FY 07-<J8
-~--
FY 06-<J7
-----
--
00,000
2,773,000
25,000
-2s-:00H- 25,000
----- --
50,000 50,000
~-+--------
25,000_
--- --+- ----~-----+----
--"'--
___~01lQ<l.
50,0.00.
50,_000_
33,000.
--
.--I------t~-
.----.-
150,000
25,000
--
-_.__.~
-~o,Q.QQ
-----
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL .I UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE I GATES REPLACEMENT
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION ----
--------.--.'-. --.---..-.-,'-----.'---.
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
PuCL:ANDACQU~-----~
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
--.---..---..
ROOF INSTALLATION
OAKGRANOAPARTMENTS ------ ------
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVE--------
------.-.-.-.-----
TRAIN STATION
- ~-_._._-
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
OTACiJl\JbUCFAClLlTIES. ,"'I' I'
PROJECT NAME
_~,ooo
___ 25,000
50,000
_c_- =t~- _
~~~~~~-
:0000
50,000
17,000 _
6,000
10,000
7,000
11
2.773,000 I
3=~0,000l . 36,~0~]-
29,000
1,433,000
55,000
30,000
25,000
1,932,900
8,000
150,000
300,000
2,000,000
150,000
140~L!50,00CI.j 150.0IJ()
-- --~--=]-- ':~-=:L
50,000
25,000
_50,000.
52,000
~=c
--+-
50,000
_ 50,000.
40,000
~~--------
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE II
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTR01URF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER I BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Esllmated Available Prior Year
~--,
E
-~--_.
Grants
C
R
u
o
s
G
N
FUN D
_~~~Fita!!~p_r~~!!~~~enera~_~~~_~C
FY10-
------
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
~~3
-~-
- ~,-
-~---
FY 06-07
Est. Avail
Prior Year
150,000
~
-~ oSo -50,O~
-~ 50,0 _
- --~- - 300,000
10-
FY
FY 08-09
50,~~
FY 07-08
50,000
FY 06-07
-
-+- ==F- -
- ~~--
Est. Avail
Prior Vea
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
- - ------~
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELD IRRIGATION
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
-
r=
~____t--____
--------+~-----1------------
---===-r=--__
--1---------
~---- -j -------j--
--~~-- -~----+-~
1,572,000
~+----
2,136,900
---r:=~-I--
-E -
430,000
2,500,000
182,000
---+---
-----+---~
----
100,000
~
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORElAIRPORTlSISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND~AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
EL CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DR/MISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
--- _._----
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR _~
GRAND / EAST GRAND
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL _~_ =:
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
HARBOR WAY
---
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT ~_ ________
HIGHWAY 101/ PRODUCE SIGNAL _____~_____
KING DR/JUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN / PiNE TRAFFIC SIGNAL---------- ----
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP _
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD ___
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS RD INTERSECTN
__ _.__._____._.___._.__..._______.._ ._._.._____u ___
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
TRAFFiC CALMiNG PROORAM--------- -- -
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
~_'0*_~i'TOtAl.1tt "if T
---
_.'-
---
.. I,
25,000
0,000
25,000
0,000
0,000
25,00Q
10,000
?5,000
15,000
58,000
8,000
5,000
5,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS) -
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTW ARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & 0
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM ~
Nl1
12
,000,000
,000.000
250,000
!$OJ
58.i
,030,
3,1
'm,ooo
0;.', '875.000
,'-1.375.000 I
,000
'Iv'11T.iiOil
AIRCRAFT NOISE INS_U_LA!!2!'lI'!~_QG.RAM {ANIP
PHASE XVIII
~
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
E S
Bonds/loans
C
R
u
S
~--
Est. Avail
Prior Year
o
N G
-----,
FUN D
~-----
Re~_y!:~,!~~nL<!a~ Incre,"!,,!~
Est. Avail
Prior Yea
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 06-07 FY 07-08
--
---~---
FY 10-
FY 09-10
--
------i--
FY 08-09
-t---
FY 07-08
-- -
FY 06-07
25.QO()
PROJECT NAME
STREETS
iiNN'UALSIDEWALKREPAIR PROGRAM~-
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM ~-- --~
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION ---~
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT ~
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS ---- ~
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ ~
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION ~
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION ~120,OOO
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
-~
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION ~ ---
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006~2007
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005~2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006~2007
US 101 FL YOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE -
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
25,000
2,120,000
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
'~+;,1iilltl!1ii',1i....otAL RAILROAD CROSSINGS
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT __~
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORMDRAiN~- -- ----
ENDENVlLLE STORM UPG!3~g~==-=--=--=-===-=
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
.-------
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENT A TION
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
'!J:~~1f'~;~~TOT!LSTQ~J:!Fi~~-=--__=--__~
SANITARY SEWER ---- --~ ----- --- - ---J-~
'A' STREET SANITARY SEWER
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDiTIONING SY_S fE_M--- ~_-+-__~
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR, WW, PH IV- B & C_~
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR WW, PH IV-D &~_
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
L1NDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV_
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP ST^-, WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPROV_
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER, PH II
WINSTON-MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR~ WW, PH II
TOTAL SEWER
----+-----
---+
----~--
8,50(),OOQ.
---"
---
3
. .
~-
0,400,000
500,000
8,sqo,000
2,573,000
2,513,1
.
--
4,793,000
--~
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Avaliable Prior Year
E S
Bonds/Loans
C
R
u
o
S
G
N
o
FUN
Redevelopment (Tax Increment
10-
---~'.~~ {-----=+-------
20,000,000
FY
FY 09-10
------t--
---=-~~.._-
FY 08-09
-+--
1,500,000
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
-E=--
1,000,000
500,000
6,000,000
11,619,000
Est Avail
Prior Yea
10-
FY
FY 09-10
-+---
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
1,000,000
__19,00.24_ ---1-
FY 06-07
-~~.._.-
2,500,000
0,381,000
Est. Avai
Prior Year
-----
_~n 30Q,0()0
1,200,000
__~'.ll()()
_50"()()Cl.
PROJECT NAME
---
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS _=-==~-220,0Q2.
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY.WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS ---
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL./ UPGRADE .-------
FIRE STATION61TRAINING TOWER PROjECT'--u_-,
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE I GATES REPLACEMENT
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
PUC LAND ACQUISITION
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
ROOF INSTALLATION
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVE
TRAIN STATION
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATiON
~ AI.: f:lU8UC_~CIUTl.!S" _22__
,605,000
20,000
2,950,000
14
>';of:< ,',,' :,dye;
-----
--.'-.--
---~--_.
--~-- , _._~~--
_._-_.,.~-~_._--
.,.--.-,-----------
28.119,000 JJ.8ClO.~ 120,!lOO.000
-E--
- --
---I----~-
_+-J...OClO'ooo
I
.--1
-
PARKS
'^"'^'''~'''''"'~ -1- - ",oooF
BRENTWooD PARK FENCE ~- --.. --.-
BRENTWO.. 00 PARK IR RIG. AT.IO..N R .E P L..A. ~E._. M.t.NT__.__. ._.. -_......_. ____... --+---+----f-
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLA"'TING --.--
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT --.
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAiR PROGRAM' ..
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SlURRY SEAL .---
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNlPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE II
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER I BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
13.891.000
---+------
--+----
--.!,383.ooo
28,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Est/mated Available Prior Year
E S
Bond~Loans
---~~_._--~-
C
SOU R
~-_.~-
-Est. Avail -
Prior Year FY 06-07
FUN
_ Rede~~~.E~nt_r!~~~_e_~nt) __~___ _.__.
G
N
D
FY 09.10 FY 10-
- -
=--=--=t===
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
o.
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
Est. Avai
Prior Year
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
WESTBOROUGHPARKBAlliiELDiRRtGAOON~-
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
--~~
~-
----+-----+------[--+--~
---t~+.-~-
--=-r=
t=~
-_r~
-
---.~~.__.
-----
_=@ ~~)b=~
~~
=-----+------=+-
~-~-.~_._-
~----+-
46,000
-~
--
~
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
~-~--~-~-
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE /OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
EL CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DRlMISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRAND / EAST GRAND
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
------- ---------------
HIGHWAY 1011 PRODUCE SIGNAL
KING DRlJUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN I PINE mAFFICSlGNAL ----- - - - -------
MISCELLANEOUS mAFRCIMPROVEM-ENTs - ----
- -_._--_._--_._--_._~---
MITCHELL AVENUE
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
---------
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL AVEIGATEWAY BLVO:I__
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS RD INTERSECTN
-------------------------- --
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE
----------------------------..-------
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
AD' 'llf+C'V,
290,000
NFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL I HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & 0
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CADIRMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM {ANI PI
PHASE XVIII
~tl~T~T_AL?~IP:_~t&1'JYT%\:IjFf~,;;+'*'!*,:W,7~Yl.~
15
1~1':...
!t~'!1,1
"_.'t
)~~22CE~22:~".~
- -
.~~~~~~ll::.z.:{~ffi!~t~..,"'~!.._.L... . __..t~.~
~~Q!,- _,,--_~.:.z::=:::i:w...;;.=_._
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
FUND NG SOURCES
_~_.__ DeV!!~perF~~.!i~___._~==-__=.___._~__I__._===-~==--=-----=-~~s-Tax _~_____~ .._~_~
Est. Avail
FY10- PrlorYeal FY07-C18 FY08.o9 FY09-10 FY1O-11
----T-==r=---
-------+------- ---"
-'-~-
~-.~~
.~
FY 06.07
50,000
150,000
65,000
49,000
-j=--
0,000
7,000
~
FY 08.09 FY 09.10
- -
----~~-----
--~-
~..
---
-
FY 07.08
--_.~.'----
Est. Avail
Prior Yea FY 06.07
----.
-_J===-
PROJECT NAME
STREETS
ANNUAi:SIDEWAlK REPAIR PROGRAM-~- r
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PRO~'[~
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
GREENDAlE AVENUE REHABILITATION
GUARD RAil INSTAllATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHEll AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION-~
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2007 -
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007
US 101 FlYOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR -
ffALEj
25,000
-.--!.oo,ooo
',000 I
__ 5~O~O
50,000
50,000
50,000
20,000
49,000
-----l---
50,000
_____7~!Q2'O_ [-----------j~
_,_____ 50,000
---+----~~-
..--....----
~---+~--
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAilROAD CROSSING ----.----
LI'lOAI)cltOSSINGS ';~1,1#
ISTORM DRAlNS_~__.______
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN ---~.--
LlNDENVlllE STORM UPGRADE
MISCEllANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENT ATION
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHEllE COURT STORM DRAIN
'OtAll'stORM
.
....,..,.,.
16
100,000
~
100,000
100,000
20,000
124,000
--
4,500,000
---1--
4,500,000
SANITARY SEWER
'N STREET SANITARY SEWER
BLOWER BUilDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR, WW, PH IV- B & C
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR WW, PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
LlNDENVlllE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFAll REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP ST A, WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER, PH II
WINSTON-MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR- WW, PH II
TOTAL SEWER
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
---
D NG SOURCES
-~--=--- ~.._,_l==~~.=_~===---=~~!~
Est. Avail
Prior Yea
N
F U
~.. ~~~~~_p<<:r.!:~~s '.
10-
FY
FY 09-10
----[~-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
6,000
-
--------+-------+- -3==-- _--i
-
------1--
___J=~
--
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
---==i=-
~-----
FY 07-08
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS -- --
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM --~-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY - f-------
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE __ f--- -==
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
----_.~
CITY.WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY -=-----f--- ----
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL J UPGRADE _ __
FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS ____
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE / GATES REPLACEMENT
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING 15,000 419,000
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION --~ ---
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION _______ ==
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS ~__
PUC LAND ACQUISITION
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
ROOF INSTALLATION ___ ___
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN A~-- =-=--=~
TRAIN STATION
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLAT~ -----
rnTAl!MUC FACn.m~~
FY 06-07
-_..__.~...._--_._-
Est. Avail
Prior Year
PROJECT NAME
~
15,000:1. ,419,:1 :-
17
.;;V~":'>!!""':; ':':~':'
----~-------j
--+----
&,000
----=L_
--1-~-
-"-
------1-
15,000
-
~-+---
------=-t-
-.---+----
_-i---
-----1---==1
5,000
~
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER -IRRIGATION" REPLACEMENT -- ----
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATiON REPAlRPROGRAM-----
COMMON GREENS PARKINGAREASLURRY SEAC-
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE II
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12.PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER / BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
~-~-------.
E S
Gas Tax
~~----'--~.
C
F U _N_~ N G ~-9__Jl R
^--~!'_~P!!~--~_._--------J-ESl Avai~-'
FYl0-
10-
FY
FY 09-10
~
FY 08-09
Prior Year FY 06-07 FY 07-08
--- -
80,000 ~ 170,OQQ-!-~
===-1:=-=~
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
--Est~~-----
Prior Year FY 06-07
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPEiMPROVEMEN~---j.n.-
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELo.IRRIGATi9f;i---::' ----
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS __
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
IlWfJAlII
1,987,000 1------------
500,000
515.000
8,000
_......15(),OQQ
80,000
2, 721,000
183,000
80,000
._"_._._-_.~--
80,000
00,000
200,000
__~ . j =:-:.~~~-- -80;o.QO
50,000
__+___1~0
50,000
35,000
-~-+--
-----------1-
---t----
-
80.000
,000
~ooo
25,000
45,000
12,545
81
---E--.--
--~+----~-
--
---------+-
----+-----
_..~
---
1~m1000
TRAFFIC
iiiRPORr BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY.WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS -
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE /OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL ._
EL CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS ~'_.'.. ..
EVERGREEN DRlMISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 3,000
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE ~____ _ ._. _::..____
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR ----- ~-- ..---,
GRAND / EAST GRAND ------...~
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL -- ,
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD ,..___1--__________- ==:=:1__
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101/ PRODUCE SIGNAL
KING DRlJUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MISCELLANEOUSTRAFFIC iMPRovEMENTS . -- -. - -
MITCHELL AVENUE -~.. ------------,
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVr>/MITCHELL AVE/GATEWAY BLVD'
SOUTH _AIRPORT BL VDINO ACCESS RD INTERSECTN II
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/UTAH AVE j
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM .I
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OLYMPIC DR IMPR
0>tQl,
--.
-
--~---
25,000
'XM77.000
25,000
.?< ,,10$,IlOO
25,000
25,000
60,000
242:
50,000
60,455
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & 0
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
EtHNOLOGy'
-
.
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSI.,[LATION PRQ,GRAM (AN!fL
PHASE XVIII
B
5,
~
000
~~&!l!!t..04!ll1 /,~,"-t ''::.:::::'.L.'583,545
515.Gil!f~
000
';8,
:!i'7:%;;-;"" j ;+"^.1!!~~.
...i~,
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
STREETS
ANNUiii:SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM -~
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM ~
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
GREENDALE AVEN-U"E-REHABIl.iTATION __~_n
. -~-
GUARD RAIL INST ALLA TIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUEREHABllIT~-~--I---_
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE~- ~OOO ~OOO ~_<J,.029
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION 50,000
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRiDGE APPROACH SLAS- - --- -- --~- -------~
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADESEPARATlON------ -- -~o --------- -- -----
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2g07---~-~ ==,370:000 824;000 800,000 -- 800,000
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006 280,000 250,000 150,000
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007 150,000
US101 FLYOVERTOOYSTERPOINTBLVD ~---~- ___
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS ___
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE __ ___,____ ____,__
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
y2"~P";Y!$:221i;;!<'.l!!Q'1' AlllTfl!ETS_:__ ______ 7!!,ooo. 1-,1_~4,04l0_
E S
Sewer Enterprise
C
R
u
o
S
G
N
D
N
F U
Measure A
0-
~---I
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08~9
FY 07 ~8
FY 06~7
Est. Avai
Prior Yea
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08~9
FY 07 ~8
--.--
FY 06~7
~
___?QO,OOO
Est. Avai
Prior Year
50,000
PROJECT NAME
-
-~--+,- ------+------.~
40,000
800,000
800,000
---
~O,OOO
_~OOO
150,000
40,000
---.-.
.
-
-
_.J!_~~
_~'OOC!..---.!.~~
__1,~,llOO
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
-i~"i__1J1111$iTOtAIHtAlLROAD CROSSINGS _
-,
___ t- _1-
--.-
55,000
---
__Jiii,QOQ.
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT _~__j
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN ______
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
LINDENVILLE STORM UPGRADE
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR ____
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENT ATION ,
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN '
~'f154fnf.lf.JiV!\Ji~;rOl'-'lilltORMJIRAlNS _n_-
19
==-=t---,
- ,-~
20,000
20,000
"90,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
190,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
50,000
20,000
1llO;ClliO
00,000
20,000
190,000_
50,000
20,000
00,000
40,000
-- 012115,ooo
50,000
20,000
00,000
75,000
-.---
30,000
334,000
-384,000
20,000
.
100,000
-155,000
-~-
-------+--
73,00
128,000
SANITARY SEWER
'A' STREET SANITARY SEWER
BLOWER .!!\!I-':~~_A~g-ONDITIQ_tilrjG-SY-ST EM _~____,-
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPA'-"--__~_______
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR" WW, PH IV-'B & C --- -~-
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR. WW, PH IV-D & E-
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
lINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV __
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA" WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPROV,
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER, PH II
WINSTON~MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR- WW, PH II
TOTAL SEWER
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
S
Enterp~__
E
Sewe
c
R
u
o
s
G
FUN 0 N
Measure A ----~
._~._-------~~
ESLAVaiI~--
Prior Yea
~------
Est. Avail
Prior Year FY 06-07
10.
FY
FY 09.10
FY 08-09
-
~-,--
---
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
6,000
25,000
---
---=:t~=:
----+------------
0-
--==t=-=-]-
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS
DANCE STUDIO FACILITY
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL J UPGRADE
FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
lOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS lADN ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE I GATES REPLACEMENT-
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
PUC LAND ACQUISITION
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
ROOF INSTALLATION
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVE_
TRAIN STATION
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC INSTALLATION
At[~UC FAC'unes",,\',,>>"
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
-=r== 6,OOi[
PROJECT NAME
20
-~---
_~1~
-----+-
-
--1-
47,000
--
-.---
--
--
..
--j---
-----+---
- -~----.
___u_ >__
~~6.~,_
PARKS
i3iiY'i'RAii:: IMPROVEME~ -.--
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION ----
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGA TlmlREPLACEMENr --~
COMMONGREENSiRRIGATiON REPAiR PROGRAM--
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREASLURRYSEAL:---
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT ___
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING ____
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE II
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER I BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
U R C E 5
~~-=-~=~~__~_____~~~~~~t(!rp!I~~~-
FUND NG 50
Me-asure-i-- ~------~-=----~-~f===-~--
Est. Avail
Prior Year
FY10-
Est. Avail
Prior Year FY 06-07
--
~+--~-
FY 09-10
-
FY 08-09
-------+--~-
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
FY 09-10 FY 10-
- -
~----+---
~---+----~~,--~----+-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH lANDSCAPE'iMPROVEMENT
WESTBOROUGHPARKBAUFiECDiRRiGATION-
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
OTALPAAKS' -
-
-I--------l----
--
-
--------I
==r
~
-
--.---t~---..--J
47,000
-
-=i=---=
--. ----~
-
---
n I----J
u _..
__=l=~~
_In
______1__
.
!!!m!f
AIRPORT BLVD & GRAND AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & MillER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORElAIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION lOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL --~
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS ._-~
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE -----
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
El CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DRiMISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE _
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRAND / EAST GRAND
GRANDVIEW DRIVE / GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GUll DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
-- ------~.._--
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT .-~~..-
HIGHWAYlO1/ PRODUCE siGNAL----~_.
KING DRiJUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD& iNTSCTN IMP
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAl- .~---- ---------..-
MISCEllANEOUS TRAFFiC IMPROVEMENTS---
MITCHEll AVENUE ..--.--..--
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHEll AVE/GATEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS FioiiiiTERSECTN ~-
SOUTH AIRPORT fjCiloiuTAH AilE _n m. - --. .... ---
TRAFFiC CALMING PROGRAM ---
15,000
290,000
-
20,000
-
_.._-
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY __
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE iI
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRe"RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAil SYSTEM .
!I0'1!IIIf#l'!\TOrAL~ :nonreCllt-ll:>lOGY.000j."",.
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PRQ.G.RAM (ANIPI
PHASE XVIII
21
J~,O(!Il
J1.-.
451
''.'.:..1,84();i!i!/ij
~--j~
-'-"~,lIQO.
~,ll()(l_
.,245,ll()(l.
L.1:li!.G,ogo
::::::. '~,lIQO.
___________~f!~::.-,:~2:
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
C E S
'--Other
--~-~_..,._-- ---.--.--------
R
u
S 0
-~_.
Est Av.ii--
Prior Yea
G
N
D
N
F U
~.._~---
Storm Water
---
FY10-
FY 09.10
- 40,000 .'- 50,000 [ 50,000'------so.ooO
50,0Q9_
--,
-,~---+---~T=_---+---------+----
-~_.
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
-::"2Q]oo
0-
----+------
STREETS
ANNUAi:SIDEWALKREPAlR PROGRAM-- ,------
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIRPROGRAM---
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND { DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION
GUARD RAIL INSTALLATIONS
HUNTINGTON AVE RESURFACING PROJ
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2007 _
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006 _
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007 __
US 101 FL YOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD _
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS _
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTION IMPR
~;*,k'"%m*'tw&:'"ii'lI@!mTP'f ALTS'TfII$I
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
-j--
FY 06-07
Est. Aval
Prior Year
PROJECT NAME
50,000
50,000
5ll.006
SO,OOO
40,000
20,000
---
-
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSING
RAlLAOADCROS$lNGS
-
~-j-:....-
--=3--
-,
::-~j------- I
. mm .....-..... ---
.
.
-
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT ---
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAIN
BEACON STREET STORM DRAif.i------ - 1::_::_'
i.1N5ENVlLLESTORMlJPGRADE------- +-=- - t-=-=-
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR =.J-----SO:OOO -- --
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN {IMPLEMENTATION -f 75,000' 75,000
SWIFT AVENUE {MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
'TAti$TOAMDflAlNSWitfii" '. -, iif' -'15,000
.
22
--
----
--t=-
0,000
--------j
78,000
78,000
-
--
--.
-+---
125,000
'-
-
SANITARY SEWER
"A" STREET SANITARY SEWER -.-,-.--
BLOWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA AVE SEWER REPAIR '-.
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR, WW, PH IV- B & C
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR WW, PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
L1NDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM _
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT
PUMP STATION n3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV,
PUMP STATION n4 (WW, PH IV
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA" WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR {SEWER REHAB IMPROV,
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION .
WET WEATHER, PH "
WINSTON:MJSC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR- WW, PH ~-
TOTAL SEWER - 'ief
- -
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
~--~ _._~----~-
Othe'--------_. _~
E
U R C
FUND NG SO
.:::~;l. Ava;I~=::'~ Slorm Water =----~-~===-=----==- -- 1_ ~:. Avan--
Prior Year FY 10- Prior Year
~,- -"
--~-
----- ----._--
---f---t--
--
--~--_. ----
PARKS ---+--
BAYTRAIL IMPROVEMENT ~ - --
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
CITYWIDE ART ACQUISITION
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT.
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAiRPROGRAM--
C6MMONGREENSPARKiNGAREASLURRYSEAi.~-
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL -~
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL ~-
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL ~
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE n
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE-REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT _-0__-
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER-/ BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
0-
-~
~
----
FY
FY 09-10
~--
~T ~
~
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
~
~
-- g :::
-~-t-------
---+----
FY 09-10
I PUBLIC FACILITIES
IAGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS _ == __~--+--_
WICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM _____ e-- __ ___~____ __.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY / BUILDING MAINTENANCE --
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION ___
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS __ u
IDANCE STUDIO FACILITY
IDAY CARE FACILITY ___
IEMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL.I UPGRADE --- -- -
/FIRE STATION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT ____ __
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS ~-t----.~
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LADN ACQUISITION
.METAL EXTERIOR FENCE/GATES F:lE"p'~~CE~NT _ -~:______ __~_.____ ____ _____ _____
MSB WALL LEAKS _ --f---
NEW CITY PARKING LOT n _0_- -- -- ==----- _____
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN_ ___ ~_____o ~__
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING _____.
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION.~- __~_o
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDINGS
PUC LAND ACQUISITION ~
RDA MISCELLANEOUS LAND ACQUISITION
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING
ROOF INSTALLATION
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS --~--I
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AV.E -01
TRAIN STATION
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HVAC liiisTALLATION --
~L,"UBLlC I'AClI-ITIES
FY 08-09
-~---_.
---
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
PROJECT NAME
23
---
~----f--
25,000 [:::25,000
60,000
50,000
50,000
25,000
60,OQ!)
75,000
75,000
50.000
----17,0001--150.000
------~-,-----
_ ~.OOO
_ 60.000
_ 75,000
75,000
5,000
25,000
~+---
447,000
50,000
18,000
-~
-~-......-
~_. ---.
----
-- ~-
~ ---
--
-+-----
_.
-,-~-
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
S
Other
E
C
R
u
o
s
G
N
FUN 0
Storm-Water-~~
--
-ESt. Avail
Prior Year
----
Est. Avail
Prior Year
0-
FY
FY 09-10
-1=
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 07-08 FY 08-09
--
----+---=l~__=+=~_T~_ -1--=-
FY 06-07
0-
FY
FY 09-10
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT-~~ +
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELl:liRRioo.ION ~=_----:_I--___
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS __ ~---t-,--_.--+-----,-
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
1';
FY 06-07
1,265,000
924,000
25,000
4$5,000 23ll.ooo
~-+-=---=1__ 349.00~==1 947.0()0
785,000
333,000
421,000
185.000
85,000
8,800
.-
.
+---
------
'-
- --+- ---+--
-+~
609,000
~ '~,942,OOO
_------+_~=_.:.-==]~,_,_~~6,OOO
_~~9~6,.00()
--~-
~=-J'
---------
...302,OOQ
TRAFFIC
~VD&GRANDAVE ----- ----~-.~-
AIRPORT BL VD& MILLER AVE --,-~. ----~.-
AIRPORT BLVD 8: SANMATEO AVE' - --.-- -- ---
BAYSHORElAIRPORT/SISTER crTIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDESTRAIN UNITS
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE I OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL I ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL
EL CAMINO REAL I HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DR/MISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVDI EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVDI ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRANDI EAST GRAND _
GRANDVIEW DRIVE I GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
HARBOR WAY
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 1011 PRODUCE SIGNAL
KING DR/JUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP
LINDEN I PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS.
MITCHELL AVENUE ,_
MUTCD UPDATE
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD HOOK RA;;,;p-~-'-'---
SOUTH AiRPORT BLVD/MITCHELLAVE/GA TEW A Y BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDINOACcESSRDINTERSECTN-'
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVDIUTAHAVe-'--------
TRAFRCCALMING PROGRAM~----n-----------
WESTBOROUGH ilLVOIGELLERT 8: OLYMPiC [)RiMPR
0' ~
565,000
200,000
1,609,000
217,000
----+
594,000
-.-
--------
----.
-
--r--
~.-+-
=-=+:=---
--=[
~O.
---
- --'- -
- :~-t:::------
------
~=-~=-$----~-
---.----, -----
i;1Ii;iiOO
4.432.000
50,000
1es,000
50,000
1;9$8,000
50,000
10,000
25,000
25,000
,000
117..800L'302.ooo
600,000
"t",,:.'-':",:,,-
.
NFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
FIBER NETWORK (MFIS)
FINANCIAL I HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM .
~1Fl)RW.'tION.1S1
0,000
10,000
35,000
~,---j
25,000
< ./\25.000.
24
78;000
7,
:: ',060,
5
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM IANIPI
PHASE XVIII
G
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
S
TOiB~
E
C
R
u
o
s
G
N
o
FUN
Fundi~_g!o -:'e Determined
10-
50,000
50,000
610,000
----t-----+----~
40,000
800,000
800,000
400,000
FY
FY 09-10
50,000
50,000
40,000
800,000
150,000
400,000
FY 08-09
50,000
50,000
40,000
800,000
150,000
400,000
FY 07-08
50,000
50,000
40,000
800,000
250,000
400,000
FY 06-07
50,000
40,000
20,000
65,000
,558,000
800,000
Est. Avail
Prior Year
20,000
50,000
2,120,000
12,000
57,000
19,000
370,000
280,000
61,000
100,000
10-
FY
FY 09-10
-===c
---+--
-
~-=t=--J-.---- -- ___
-=--- oo=_---l_
-==:::+---'-+--=---==r
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
-00----.1---
. ---
--+--...-
----+----
--.-.--
-.----
~._.
--
FY 06-07
Est. Avai'
Prior Yea
STREETS
iiNN'UAi:SiDEWALK REPAIR PROGR~~----
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
DEL MONTE AVE REHABILITATION
EAST GRAND I DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
EL CORTEZ DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
GREENDALE AVENUE REHABILITATION -----.--
GUARD RAiLiN-sTALLATioNs-- ---
HUNTINGTON.AvE, RESURFACING p. ROJ----_---=:j
MITCHELL AVENUE REHABILITATION _I
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION.oo----
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
REPAIR SO AIRPORT BLVD BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
SOUTH LINDEN AVE GRADE SEPARATION -
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM, 2006-2007 .-
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2005-2006
STREET SLURRY SEAL, 2006-2007
US 101 FL YOVER TO OYSTER POINT BLVD
US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
WEST ORANGE AVE INTERSECTIONlMPR --
t>R$V'
PROJECT NAME
1,590,000 I 1,490,000
25,000
-
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
GATEWAY BLVD RAILROAD CROSSiNG-
,tALRAlL.1l0AD CROSSIN~!~___
50,000
50,000
50,000
---
50,000 50,000
75,000 ~
100,000 ~
~,ooo L 100,000 L. .
50,000
55,000
8,500,000
20,000
75,000
55,000
99,000
75,000
73,000
371,000
I
--- '.'--.-...-'..]-
-------- -.
---
STORM DRAINS
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT--- ---
~ALO~DRIVESTORM5R.AJ~_ ____ _I
BEACON STREET STORM DRAIN
LINDENVILLESTORM UPGRADE- ==E
MISCELLANEOUSSTORMDRAIN- REPAiR-~-- ------- ....- . -
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN I IMPLEMENT ATION--f --t- __ =_____
SWIFT AVENUE I MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAIN
"f";Jr -
---
8,820;000
25
20,000
50,000
20,000
,:18,890,OOO;~. ;:90;000
0,400,000
20,000
4,500,000
50,000
20,000
500,000
100,000
20,000
"190,000
50,000
20,000
00,000
20,000
"'190,000
50,000
20,000
100,000
50,000
4,500,000
50,000
20,000
100,000
75.000
2,573,000
7.388,000
20,000
6.000
30,000
5,127,000
8,m,000
---+----~
'.1
~--
----.
._-~
----
---+-
-1-- --
--
-=~=
-=t=-
--------.--.
SANITARY SEWER
'A' STREET SANITARYSEWER ------------
BLOWER BUILDiNG AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
cALiFOi1N1AA'vESEWER REPAIR --- ---'- u -
EAST HARRIS SEWER REPAIR
EAST OF 101 SEWER IMPR, WIN., PH IV- B & C
EAST OF 101 REMAINING SWR IMPR WW, PH IV-D & E
FRANCISCO DRIVE SEWER
UNDENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS, WW, PH IV
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
OUTFALL REPAIR PROJECT .---.---
------
PUMP STATION #3 & SWIFT AVE SEWER IMPROV.
PUMP STATION #4 (WW, PH IV)
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
RECYCLE WATER FEASIBILITY +---
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION PROGRAM _
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WQCP & PUMP STA, WW, PH II
SEWER PIPE LINING
STRUCTURAL REPAIR I SEWER REHAB IMPROV.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT EXPANSION
WET WEATHER, PHIi-- _:=-~~ __
WINSTON-MISC SANITARY SEWER REPAIR- WW, PH II
---~OTALSEW~--
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
FUN DIN G S 0 U R C ~ S
_...__._._.._-~----- -_._.__...,~- I Total
Funding To Be Determined -
ESt.AYal~~~----'~ ----.------..--- Est. Avail
Prior Year FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- Prior Year FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FYlll-1
1,200,000 1,000,000
8,000 10,000
50,000
""-""1 "...... 42,812,000 W01,.O,oool 20,180,000 I' '.l$o,OilOJ;)l$O,OOO
--- - - - - - -
54,000 - - - -
---- - - - 30,000 - 80,000
~ 50,000 - - -
- - - -
50,000 - - -
7,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
25,000
60,000 60,000 60,000
75,000 75,000 50,000
75,000 75,000 50,000
25,000 25,000 25,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
100,000
25,000
50,000
25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
50,000
1,500,000 20,000,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
2,500,000
6,000
160,000
-~ 500,000
-E 2,788,000 419,000
16,000,000
287,000
50,000
22,000,000
1,000,000 33,000
220,000
17,000
300,000
1,605,000
10,000
27,000
2,950,000
- -=-=-----~~~E=----
~-
~_.__.
~-- ---
.~----
-.----.--. ~~
-"-_.- ---~-- ----+-
~._-- -----
~-,- --
~---_.
-----_"0
-==~_=t=~~-~-
--:t:_=~_
------
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEM'ENTS' -------
BICYCLE LOCKERS REHAB PROGRAM -~---~
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
CITY FACILITY I BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ANNEX EXPANSION
CITY-WIDE SPACE ANALYSIS--------- - --~------
DANCESTUDiOFACiLITY-- ----- -----~
DAY CARE FACILITY
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPL .I UPGRADE
FIRE STA'-ION 61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
FIRE STATION 65 EXTERIOR REPAIRS
HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
LOW MOD MISCELLANEOUS LAON ACQUISITION
METAL EXTERIOR FENCE I GATES REPLACEMENT
MSB WALL LEAKS
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMNT & BLDG PLAN__
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
OYSTER PQINT MARINA REMEDIATION------
PAINTING QF CITY BUILDINGS
PUC LAND ACQUISITION -------
RDA MISCELLANEOUSLAND-ACQUISITION-~-
REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUlLOO'iG'-
ROOF INST ALLATION---~---n---- - -------
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS ----- - ---
SITE REMEDIATIONAT27-SOUTH LiNDEN A,iE----
TRAiN STATION-- --- u_ - _n__ - - -- - - - -
WESTBOROUGH REC CENTER HV AC INST ALLATloiT
P~~!:.I9_~~!L!!I!!._
26
300,000
2,000,000
150,000
50,000
52,000
50,000
5,000
50,000
29,000
1,,433,000
55,000
10,000
30,000
75,000
28,000
50,000
1 ,932,900
47,000
-
36,000
.----- ----
----.--------.- --
----
--------,- ~
-~
-~~,.
~---
-----+------
--~.
~--~-------- --------
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT _ ___
BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE e
BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEM~-- -------
CiTYWiDEARTACQUiSiTiQN------ ----~~.
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
CIVIC CENTER IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
COiXMONGREENSIRRtGATION REPAjRPR6~N,,':'~_
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL
COMMO~ GREENS STR!,JGTURE_~N-'='^-N..CEMENT __=
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
CYPRESS & PINE RETAINING WALL
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
GATEWAY BLVD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
JUNIPERQ SERRA TREE REMEDIATION
LINEAR PARK TRAIL -~-
LINEAR PARK TRAIL PHASE II
NORTH ACCESS ROAD TRAIL
ORANGE PARK BACKFLOW & MAIN LINE VALUE REPL
ORANGE PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
QRANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD ASTROTURF
ORANGE PARK SOCCER FIELD IRRIGATION REPL
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BASEBALL FIELD
PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION -j
PURCHASE 12-PASSENGER VAN FOR REC PROGRAMS-I
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
SOCCER I BALLFIELDS RENOVATION
----~., --
~
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR 5 YEARS
Including Estimated Available Prior Year
FY 10-1
50,000
300,000
FY 09-10
50,000
FY Oe-69
50,000
S
Total
50,000
E
FY 07-6e
C
R
FY 06-67
7D.OOo
1,987,000
.l:!
o
Est. Avail
Prior Year
230:000
s
FUN D N G
-------==-.__ Fun-dlng"To B~~ermi~~-~-
10-
FY
FY 09-10
~
'1- .~~'-
---+==- ---- ~
- - -,
----- ~.
.... - = -=1-
FY 08-69
FY 06-07
Avai
Year
PROJECT NAME
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS
WESTBOROUGH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELD IRRIGATION
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS' J=,
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER REPLACE
Est.
Prior
8,000
1,265,000
924,000
609,000
2,721,000
183,000
50,000
80,000
,942,000
947,000
785,000
333,000
421,000
80,000
-
565,000
80,000
00,000
200,000
500,000
850,000
349,000
200,000
,609,000
80,000
35,000
80,000
81,000
18,800
28,000
9,000
217,000
594,000
45,000
so,ooo
E-'--
--
~~-_.=
~~~-
-~....__..~
--,
-=~~-
-,
~[~-:-~~~-+-
~,~
--
---
--T~
--+-------
-~-+--
,386,000
~ ~
'70.000 1-,,~,$37,ooo,I+7.',$03,ooo
1,946,000
25,000
50,000
195,000
25,000
302,000
50,000
20,000
----
-+-
------+-'
--~-
-
25,000 25,000
SO,OOO 50,000
0,000 10,000
0,000
0,000
0,000
467,000 t ,;~S08,OOO
25,000
15,000
50,000
10,000
25,000
15,000
10,000
25,000
25,000 i
toQ.!!!XIYij
80,000
135,000
210,000
1,282,800
58,000
28,000
5,000
5,000
--
27
11
24.481,
--+----
.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
A'"~ ~fflO" {MR'> r . ·
FINANCIAL / HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTW ARE
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PHASE I --
INTRANET - WEB PROJECT _
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER I
LASER FICHE, PHASE II
PERMITTING PROJECT, R & D .'~
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
POLICE CAD/RMS AND FIRE RMS UPGRADE
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
'Ali$l
TRAFFIC
AiRPOFiT BLVD & GRAND'AVT---~------
AIRPORT BLVD & MILLER AVE
AIRPORT BLVD & SAN MATEO AVE
BAYSHORE/AIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
CITY.WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL
COUNTDOWN PEDES TRAIN UNITS ----,
DUBUQUE AVE & EAST GRAND AVE
DUBUQUE AVE / OYSTER POINT BLVD
ECCLES AVE & OYSTER POINT BLVD
EL CAMINO REAL / ARLINGTON DR SIGNAL ,__
EL CAMINO REAL / HICKEY INTERSECTION IMPRVMNTS
EVERGREEN DR/MISSION RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FORBES BLVD / EAST GRAND AVE
FORBES BLVD / ECCLES AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ~
GATEWAY BLVD & EAST GRAND TRAFFIC IMPR
GRAND/EAST GRANO----'-'------
GRANDVIEW DRIVE I GRAND AVE SIGNAL
GULL DRIVE & OYSTER POINT ilL VD
HARBOR WAY-------'------~--- ,----
HICKEY BLVD INTERCONNECT
HIGHWAY 101/ PRODUCE SIGNAL ----- t ,.
KING DR/JUNIPERO SERRA SIG UPGRD & INTSCTN IMP -- -
LINDEN / PINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL AVENUE -~------
MUTCD -UPDATE"-~--~~'-----'-'
-_._~._-~-
OPTICOM SYSTEM
SIGN INVENTORY '~~---,~-
SOUTHAIRPORT BLVD HOOK RAMP ---,--,
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/MITCHELL"AVE/GA'TEWAY BLVD
SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD/NO ACCESS 00 INTERSECTN
SOUTH AIRPORTBLVD/UTAH AVE ---,---------
TRAFFIC CALMrNGPROGRAM _____u -----
WESTBOROUGH BLVD/GELLERT & OL Y"MPIC DR IMPR-
'mAFFIC'
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM {ANlPI
PHASE XVIII
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NOTES
11
NEW
APPROPRIATION
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
Provides a reference number for all projects within a specific category and does not necessarily indicate the order in which
the project will be undertaken.
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
FY 10-11
o
6
FY09-
5
FY 08-09
4
FY 07-08
3
FY 06-07
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
Column
ITEM NO.
Project Name & Number refers to the Engineering Division name and number designation for current project underway.
The numbers in parenthesis are the Finance Department account numbers.
Column 2
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
Column 3
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
Column 4
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2008-2009.
Column 5
The estimated project cost for Fiscal Year 2009-2010.
Column 6
Fiscal Year 2010-2011
The estimated project cost for
Column 7
The sources of funds.
Column 8
Prior year's funding approved for this project
Column 9
28
(unused) for the project.
Funding request for the current fiscal year.
Prior year's funding available
o
11
Column
Column
GRAND AVENUE RESUREAClNG PROGRAM
REPAIR SOUTH AIRPOR' BOULEVARD
BRID(iE APPROACH Sl.AR
-
""
I'
/
'- ...'"
!
Ii ;"
r.~CT,
.....
.'"
I.
.1
OWl
T-
~...
1Mf,
.....
-,
..'"
/
,
i
I
~
.j
\
t
\
\
r ffj="'.'
\-
\.
\
\
\
"'"
1(;11
~~
,,>'~'c'
ION
S UP(iRADE
....
A, US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
4, SOUTH LINDEN A VENUE GRADE SEPAR.... I1n~
'"
I I
'~
Jf t ~"'r
J~ I I:'..
I:::: @
~
I
/,
~ . 1C4"''''~ 'Cl4oc",
" .~,
Jf
\'/, ~
....;' I
"
/
...
'~.*
at
i ,
. t
t !
/ ,
I I
~",
d'r['
,
ill
"'11;
, - j I
". \ , \ ;C~~;.. : ,: J II :...
'\' ,- I,
" \\\1..'111
~,I-
(\ \ I ! r
,,~\ \ \
PINEIIURST IV ,\ Y REIIAB
IV ES'j BOROU(ill S I RH'. r
,I':'
/'
!
! '
I
.~
~
.~ '
.~j
STREETS
R
''''
,\
r
"' I( \ \ PltJ!: EX fFN nON
DH '\fH".;'iF AVE'lI'F RElLA
.1
.....
......
Major Street Project
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
o
A V AILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
.. . .NEW.. ,
ApPROPRiATION
.....
ON
FY 10-11
o
FY09-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
APPROPRIAT
61,000
61,000
61,000
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
UTL
B
GR
PROJECT COSTS
61,000
61,000
o
o
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GA TEW A Y ASSESSMENT
o
o
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
61,000 ./
MAJOR STREET PROJECTS
2
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
1A US 101 OFF RAMP AND HOOK RAMPS
(50-13231-9710)
TOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
UTL = UTILITIES REIMBURSEMENT
Streets
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STREETS
o
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
NEW
APPROPRIATION
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
PRIOR
YEAR
FUNDING
METHOD
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
ITEM NO.
APPROPRIATION
CI
GT
MA
PROJECT COSTS
800,000
800,000
,928,000
2006-2007 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
(51-13231-0701)
370,000
280,000
370,000
280,000
MA
GT
800,000
800,000
800,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
280,000
2005-2006 STREET SLURRY SEAL
ST-03-3 (51-13231-0403)
2
2,000
10,000
2,000
MA
GT
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
32,000
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
ST -99-3 (51-13231-9913)
3
9,000
SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION
ST-03-6 (51-13231-0401)
4
9,000
2,120,000
9,000
2,120,000
GT
MA
RDA
2,120,000
OAK AVENUE EXTENSION
ST-02-6 (58-13231-0301)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 5,000,000)
5
50,000
50,000
GT
MA
50,000
DEL MONTE AVENUE REHABILITATION
ST-02-7 (51-13231-0302)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $
6
858,000)
h:lcip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
2,851,000
GENCY
FUND
2,851,000
,640,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
990,000
990,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
,090,000
4,429,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
OA = OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS (COLMA & SMC)
B = BONDS
Streets
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
11
NEW.
ApPROPRiATioN
ON
9 0
- -
PRIOR AVAILABLE
YEAR PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIAT
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
FY 10-
6
FY 09-10
5
FY 08-09
4
FY 07-08
3
FY 06-07
STREETS
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
ITEM NO.
7,000
50,000
GT
MA
PROJECT COSTS
57,000
PINEHURST WAY REHABILITATION
(51-13231-0303)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $
7
100,000
57,000
00,000
GT
225,000
410,000)
WESTBOROUGH STREET LIGHTS UPGRADE
(51-13231-0505)
8
20,000
20,000
CG
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
60,000
COMMON GREENS SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13231-0307)
9
o
o
26,000
25,000
CI
RDA
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
ANNUAL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13231-0308
o
610,000
GRAND AVENUE RESURFACING PROJECT
(51-13231-0702)
11
MA
GT
GR
400,000
400,000
800,000
2006-2007 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
(51-13231-0703)
2
MA
GT
CI
400,000
400,000
REPAIR SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD BRIDGE
APPROACH SLAB
(51-13231-0704)
3
GT
65,000
77 ,000
228,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
,867,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
3,028,000
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT A
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
OPT = ORANGE PARK TRUST FUND
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
GENCY
FUND
3,079,000
2,140,000
,490,000
GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX
SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
,490,000
,590,000
6,296,000
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
OA = OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS (COLMA & SMC)
B = BONDS
-~
-
~
I' ",
""
~..
r. JII<< CT.
.....
,..--
RAlIR( lAD CROSSINGS
\ !'. \\\Y F101Il.EV..\R
- .....,.
~
.,
-
1Mf,
..
t
,
I
~
~
_.. -
I
I
!
..--
/
,
CD, l
r~J
~., A
I '
'\. \
'. '1
/\ .
r'\,ti.
I~ ...\
\
f
i
J
I
Ill,
;.
'\
.
\ ./~ (....
~ ,//., ! ~~~
V'o'/' ~; I !
~
~ .
~ "'-
I f ~
l~
I::
.~
f >
I' . ~.~
;. ~"''-~
"..",.~
\ f
.It I
./
J
i
"
\ ....,.f:: ~-
~ / I~,
II:
',~'::- I! '
'\/,' '. <:..:. '.. ;'. j fl. t. .. . .... '. J.
'. l \ ,I
\'. \.; ..-
~Ii
~<\"\ \' ! I '
t
/
I
. .~.
.~j
.~!
.~.
...
f
.".
4 '.
., ~ .~..
':..........~,.\
\ "
. . \. .. .to .,...
..~.\. '. JI'.. \.
" ' , '\""""
< ,..il . f' ~
" \
I \ .
".., ,. f
,~, ~ J
, .~
, / \""
.f ,
~
..... .... .,'
f'
/
~
/
\
RR XING
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
11
.... . NEW..
APPROPRIATIOt>j
ON
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
FY 10-
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
APPROPRIAT
GT
PROJECT COSTS
200,000
o
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:lcip 06-07/torm_cip ty 06-07
o
o
o
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
o
200,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
o
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
2
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
-
1 GATEWAY BOULEVARD
(51-13231-9716)
TOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
iR^
I
11'(
-
ORM DRAIN
.....
FS
"iVI
IN
S IORM DRAI"iS
,~. ......
i'~
'I i
V
;\ \~
' :,< ~..",
ON
!
~
t
I t
l~
I::: ...
~!
JRIVI
/'
)RAINS
\V^
.lIt-.
,
"
M
STOR
,\INS
S IUR\1
I
1-
~
J
.~
I.
~.. ;
.....
\1
1>
NUl',
AV
F
SW
4.
'/
,f
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
2.
lit
,..-II
;-,
~_CT.
Eo
AIIC
;
-
t
I
~
--
/
lAlIT,
......
!
I
f
\/
...IJ
/
I
~
\
\
, ,~:ftt.
AJ
.......
./1
,
j
.,
I
..
,
,
J
I
"
I
.~
.~,
.~ .
.~:
.,
t
Q)
'~.~
~"'''~ '
'i .~,
i .
..., I
/ @l
I
<'
\
\
I'
;
\
""
~
....
i' .....
lit
.,. .
.~
Storm Drain
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STORM DRAINS
11
..NEW.'
APPAOPRIA TION
o
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
PRIOR
YEAR
FUNDING
METHOD
FY 10-
o
FY09-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
ITEM NO.
APPROPRIATION
49,000
50,000
49,000
50,000
GT
SW
50.000
PROJECT COSTS
50,000
50,000
119,000
MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN REPAIR
(51-13231-9916)
GT
50,000
50,000
50,000
75,000
ARCH CULVERT REPLACEMENT
(51-13231-0014)
2
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
SW
75,000
75,000
STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
(51-13231-0310)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 525,000)
3
73,000
73,000
MA
00,000
73,000
SWIFT AVENUE/MICHELLE COURT STORM DRAINS
(51-13231-0503)
4
55,000
55,000
MA
55,000
55,000
AVALON DRIVE STORM DRAINS
(51-13231-0504)
5
280,000
B
8,500,000
L1NDENVILLE STORM DRAIN UPGRADE
(71-13235-0455)
6
o
377,000
2 GRANT FUNDING
h:lcip 06-07/form_cip fy 06-07
657,000
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PO = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION
o
00,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
00,000
330,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
8,897,000
TOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
REPAIR INVESTIGATION
FAt.
o
7.
II
HFR PROGRAM PHASE
EA
S/\NITARY SE\VER
WETW
Sfb\l'C t'P/;R 'Df 0/ \\.\ TEll ()I'\UTY
UNfROl. PI-":-IT ,\NO PUMP STA T/O\JS
PUMP ST A nON NO.4
(WET WEATlfER PROGRA'l.ll'll\SF I'
4.
Cj)
-
-.
,
J1IU CT.
Eo
......
\
~-
T"
I
~
..'"
...,
......
-..
/
,
f
j
~ I
""-~I j
i '..... t
\ '\ \~
/\. '5'
r \m'k' \:V
--'\..
\
~~
J
~ ..~.. '\.
""'':'~.~
'-ij
....
!
,!
I
f
.: ~
J
I
I
.,'
1"
/'
~It,
'.~~/
"It!
,....I
...
CD
,
',..*
I
~
!
.~
t
I t~
l!i
~.
. I'
~/
..It
~.I I
..
"i
.....1
"It
4'
/A.
...
"
,
,
"-
"
,,,~
~.
Sanitary Sewer
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEWER
11
NEW
APPROPRIATION
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
9
PRIOR YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
FY 10-
o
FY09-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
ITEM NO.
APPROPRIATION
o
50,000
SE
50,000
50,000
PROJECT COSTS
50,000
50,000
50,000
PUMP STATION RENOVATION
(71-13235-0053)
MANHOLE REPAIR PROGRAM
(71-13235-9751 )
2
20,000
o
75,970
60,000
SE
SE
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION
(71-13235-0051)
3
o
861,626
B/L
DP
ADB
4,500,000
4,500,000
PUMP STATION NO.4'
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE IV)
(71-13235-0352)
'FUNDS ADVANCED FROM RDA BONDS
PUMP STATION 4 COMPLETE IN FY 06-07 OTHER
PROJECTS COMPLETE IN FY 09-10.
4
30,000
o
55,000
475,000
SE
B/L
500,000
30,000
SEISMIC UPGRADE OF WATER QUALITY CONTROL
PLANT AND PUMP STATIONS
(71-13235-0555)
5
4,620,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
4,570,000
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
50,000
RDA ~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE ~ SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PO ~ PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 ~ PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
,577 ,596
90,000
5,090,000
MA ~ MEASURE A
GT ~ GAS TAX
CS ~ CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW ~ GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
90,000
90,000
GR ~ GRANTS
TIF ~ TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW ~ STORM WATER FUND
B/L ~ BONDSILOANS
CI ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP ~ DEVELOPER FEES
SB ~ SAN BRUNO SHARE
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page 2 - Sanitary Sewer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SANITARY SEWER
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR YEAR AVAILABLE NEW
METHOD PRIOR YEAR APPROPRIATION
-
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATION
6 WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II' 7,700,000 2,400,000 SE 333,638 334,000
(71-13235-0556) B/L 4,793,000 4,793,000
. 2.45 MILLION WILL BE ADVANCED FROM RDA.
7 OUTFALL REPAIR INVESTIGATION 50,000 SE
(71-13235-0550) NBSU
8 STRUCTURAL REPAIR/SEWER REHABILITATION 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 SE 12,000 0
IMPROVEMENTS
(71-13235-0650)
9 RECYCLE WATER STUDY 116,000 SE 178,000 0
(71-13235-0559) GR 75,000 38,000
OT 78,000 78,000
10 EAST OF 101 REMAINING SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 10,400,000 B/L
(WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE IV)
11 SEWER PIPE LINING 100,000 SE 0 0 100,000
(71-13235-0750)
PAGE SUBTOTAL - 8,041,000 2,500,000 100,000 10,500,000 0 0 5,469,638 5,243,000 2,798.000 I
TOTAL 12,661,000 2,590,000 190,000 15,590,000 90,000 7,047,234 5,293,000 7,368,000 I
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PO = PARKING DISTRICT
NBSU = NORTH BAYSIDE SYSTEM UNIT B/L = BONDS/LOANS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT ADB = ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOND
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
MSIl WALL LEAKS
HILTON IIOTEL SIIE REMEIlIATION
NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEFDS ASSESSMENT AND IlUILIlING PLAN
REROOF WFSTIlOROU<i1! RFCREA TION BlIlUJING
17.
I R.
19,
2J
NIN( lWFR PROJECT
SOli IHI.INlJEN AVENUE
C FACILITIES
ION NO 61 I R,\
1',\RKIN(i Lor
lJlAIION Al 27
FIRE SIAl
NI.W('IIY
Sill'. REMI
PlJBL
J1AIION
'N.I.AN
OYSTER POI:-.lT \L\RI:-.IA REM
OAK (iRANlJ AP,\I{ 1 MI.NTS
ORAN(iE PARK SilT EXPANS
6.
7,
I
ORANGE PARK RECREATION IJlIlLlJlNG
TRAIN STATION
DA Y CARE FACII.ITIES
3,
4,
5.
IN
I
-
, ""V @
! , @
,,\II -
~ ..... ~ ~
.. ......
I 1- ",. /' .....
..
l~ 0..$ / ..$
-
I:;: ~~ , .Jo ~,
, ..
~ ~~ I Qt
@0~ ~~ l' rAST,
~~~ ~~ .. .....
I' 1&4",.. '<riI9" @ Iii ~ r
; IWT ...
~~ WT08L .J i E. JAIIIE CT,
l'
\ .. 1-
I ..
JI'
~~ J .. \ r
/ /I \ ~/
I ~
I \
.~~
""""" -
~-'~
SI
~
.....' I
, II
~ ..
.. ,.~\ ... J
~ 'GJ
"It' 4p~
~ ~
Qt /"'~ \
\
""
A()I
';
./
....
~
'\
\
i
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
i
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE '.. .... NE.W .
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR ".APPROP.RIATION
- -
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATION
67,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 CI 17,000 17,000
25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 CI 0 0
GT 0
MA 0
SE 0
3,207,000 GR 2,773,000 2,773,000
DP 1,107,000 15,000
50,000 RDA 67,700 50,000
300,000 RDA/B 315,000 300,000
287,000 SWRP 288,000 287,000
2,200,000 RDA 2,500,000 1,200,000
6,136,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 - 75,000 7,067,700 4,642,000 J,494,O
GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PO = PARKING DISTRICT
B/L = BONDS/LOANS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:lcip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
PUBLIC FACILITIES
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
CITY FACILITY/BUILDING MAINTENANCE
(51-13232-0221)
2
ITEM NO.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY
(51-13232-0021)
2
ORANGE PARK RECREATION BUILDING
(51-13232-0526)
TRAIN STATION
(58-13232-0320)
DAY CARE FACIlITIES
(58-13232-0225)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 3,000,000)
3
4
5
OYSTER POINT MARINA REMEDIATION
(51-13232-0410)
6
$ 3,500,000}
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
LMIHF = LOW MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND
OAK GRAND APARTMENTS
(56-13232-0450)
(TOTAL PROJECT COST:
PAGE SUBTOTAL
7
Public Facilities
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
11
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIAT
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
ITEM NO.
PROJECT COSTS
AGENCY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
(58-13232-0451)
8
220,000
500,000
RDA
220,000
22,000,000
PUC LAND ACQUISITION
(58-13232-0452)
9
o
o
RDA
B/L
LMIHF
MISCELLANEOUS LOW/MODERATE LAND ACQUISITION
(56-13232-0453)
o
2,950,000
4,000,000
LMIHF
5,450,000
B/L
6,000,000
ORANGE PARK SITE EXPANSION/LAND ACQUISITION
(51-13232-0720)
PAINTING OF CITY BUILDING
(51-13232-0522)
11
2
CI
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
FIRE STATION NO.
(51-13232-0626)
3
,605,000
o
RDA
,605,000
61 TRAINING TOWER PROJECT
NEW CITY PARKING LOT
(72-13236-0570)
4
60,000
300,000
PO
60,000
8,000
SITE REMEDIATION AT 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE
(58-13232-0525)
5
8,000
41,000
RDA
RDA
CI
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
27,000
INSTALL ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT CITY BUILDINGS
(51-13232-0524)
6
20,000
7,000
37,500
9,500
MSB WALL LEAKS
(51-13232-0220)
6,000
55,000
CI
6,000
7
4,976,000
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PO = PARKING DISTRICT
CDBG = COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
4,943,000
75,000
75,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
75,000
75,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B/L = BONDS/LOANS
45,536,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
S8 = SAN BRUNO SHARE
LMIHF = LOW MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page 3 - Public Facilities
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR A V AILABLE . NEW,
- - METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR APPhOPhlATION
PROJECT COSTS -xPPROPRIATION
18 HILTON HOTEL SITE REMEDIATION 10,000 50,000 CI
(51-13231-0015)
19 NEW MAIN LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND 500,000 1,500,000 20,000,000 B/L
BUILDING PLAN
(51-13232-0721)
20 DANCE STUDIO FACILITY 100,000 DP
GR
21 METAL EXTERIOR FENCE/ GATES REPLACEMENT 50,000 CI
22 EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENT 25,000 SE
UPGRADE PROGRAM
(51-13232-0722)
23 REROOF WESTBOROUGH RECREATION BUILDING 33,000 CI
(51-13232-0723)
24 MISCELLANEOUS RDA LAND ACQUISITIONS 1,000,000 B/L
(58-13232-0452)
- -
PAGE SUBTOTAL 1,568,000 1,700,000 20,000,000 0 0
-
- -
TOTAL 53,240,000 1,850,000 20,150,000 150,000
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PO = PARKING DISTRICT
LMIHF = LOW MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND B/L = BONDS/LOANS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
CITYWIDE ART AQUISITION
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED BASEBALL FIELD
SOCCER/BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
23.
24.
25.
26.
28
PARKS
COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL AND
STRIPING
COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION AND REPLANTING
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
9.
20.
21.
22
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
NORTH ACCESS TRAIL
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
LINEAR PARK TRAIL (PHASE I)
LINEAR PARK TRAIL (PHASE II)
GATEWAY BOULEVARD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
(~
-
..
J
,,~,
r.
JOllIE CT,
......
(?\. ~
P \
.. . /' . ..-$I
-.
Ai
"'/~
"\..~.
AW
j
~~)
-.
~.
.omER.....I'CIIfT'
EAST",
'''",.
~
i
@/--
~
/
~
I
AJ--'
\
/~m
\
~
c.
'1I1lHIJ...
\
I HI ~
""11"
.~
"
,
~
I
t~:
I
!t
~
.;
/ /
~;~
~~":.
~~'..'
z
l'!!:::::':::'
l'
J
I
-.
1
~.
, "o4ltr
I It '-'"
r - :..':: j 'lC'"-
'~ -..:' t~
--"'L.,t,~
..I.........~...:s.....
8.....-.....~
....~....
...... 8.,...~...:... ..........
. ..., ,~._i~~,__
'/' ,>"'j.. ....rAl!l=::.~...:.;:.~.
~i//~h\ 1 '
CD'''~~ ,l
.,d'
,"Z)
\
."'"
,~~
.!i
~;.,
~.:I:;;;;:,~~!
Q) /'
...
;.,~#/
"..
Parks
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS
11
.NEW
APPROPRiATION
.. .
ON
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
PRIOR
YEAR
FUNDING
METHOD
FY 10-11
o
FY09-
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
ITEM NO.
APPROPRIAT
PROJECT COSTS
,961,900
I)
LINEAR PARK TRAIL (PHASE
(51-13232-0523)
,932,900
o
,932,900
70,000
GR
PROP 12
LINEAR PARK TRAIL (PHASE
(51-13232-0724)
2
GR
,433,000
GATEWAY BOULEVARD ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0032)
3
50,000
50,000
GTW
50,000
COMMON GREENS IRRIGATION REPAIR PROGRAM
(51-13232-0321 )
4
7,000
74,000
CG
25,000
25,000
25,000
67,000
75,000
COMMON GREENS TREE REMOVAL
(51-13232-0322)
5
o
75,000
CG
50,000
75,000
COMMON GREENS TREE PRUNING
(51-13232-0725)
6
CG
50,000
75,000
75,000
28,000
EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
(58-13232-0521 )
7
28,000
79,000
RDA
RDA
GR
54,000
BAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
(51-13232-0620)
8
18,000
36,000
18,000
36,000
GR
GT
400,000
SPRUCE INTERSECTION
(51-13232-0621)
9
150,000
80,000
50,000
80,000
47,000
50,000
SE
47,000
NORTH ACCESS TRAIL
(51-13232-0622)
PAGE SUBTOTAL
o
2,358,900
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
OT = OTHER FUNDING SOURCE
h:lcip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
2,614,900
o
25,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
25,000
75,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
4,290,900
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
CG = COMMON GREENS ASSESSMENTS
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
FUNDS
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page 2 - Parks
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 11
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR A V AILABLE NEW
- METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR APPROPAIATION
- A"'PP R 0 P R I A T ION
PROJECT COSTS
11 VARIOUS CITY GREEN SPOTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 CI
12 BRENTWOOD PARK FENCE 30,000 CI
13 PARADISE PARK IRRIGATION 52,000 CI
14 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK BALLFIELD REPLACEMENT 300,000 CI
15 BRENTWOOD PARK IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT 80,000 CI
16 WESTBOROUGH PARK BALLFIELD IRRIGATION 300,000 CI
17 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK SOCCER FIELD 2,000,000 CI
ASTROTURF
18 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK SOCCER FIELD 150,000 CI
IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT
19 COMMON GREENS PARKING AREA SLURRY SEAL 25,000 CG
AND STRIPING
(51-13232-0726)
20 COMMON GREENS STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT 60,000 60,000 60,000 CG
(51-13232-0727)
PAGE SUBTOTAL 85,000 110,000 192,000 2,500,000 430,000
-
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
CG = COMMON GREENS ASSESSMENTS SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT OT = OTHER FUNDING SOURCE
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
Parks
Page 3
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
9 0 11
PRIOR AVAILABLE . NE'W ..
Y~ PRIOR YEAR >APPFlQj:lRiATION
APPROPRIATION
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
FY 10-11
6
FY 09-10
5
FY 08-09
4
FY 07-08
3
FY 06-07
PARKS
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
ITEM NO.
CI
PROJECT COSTS
50,000
50,000
50,000
JUNIPERO SERRA TREE REMEDIATION AND
REPLANTING
(51-13232-0728)
21
GR
55,000
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
(71-13232-0729)
22
DP
,987,000
WESTBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0730)
23
OT
DP
OT
50,000
0,000
CITYWIDE ART AQUISITION
(51-13232-0731
ORANGE PARK STORAGE SHED BASEBALL FIELD
. 50% FUNDING FROM SSFUSD
(51-13232-0732)
24
25
SOCCER/BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
(51-13232-0733)
26
GR
CI
OT
GR
75,000
30,000
PURCHASE 12 PASSENGER VAN FOR RECREATION
PROGRAMS
(51-13232-0734]
27
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
GR
OT
36,000
ORANGE PARK BOCCE BALL COURT ENCLOSURE
(51-13232-0623)
WESTBOROUGH PARK PICNIC SHELTER
REPLACEMENT
28
29
DP
500,000
DP
5,000
SELLICK PARK PICNIC AREA UPGRADE
30
CI
50,000
CITYWIDE TREE PLANTING
(51-13232-0735)
31
36,000
36,000
o
o
50,000
565,000
2,343,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
2,394,900
hJcip 06-07/form_cip-fy 06-07
2,650,900
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
OT = OTHER FUNDING SOURCE
430,000
2,525,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
367,000
850,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
6,718,900
TOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
CG = COMMON GREENS ASSESSMENTS
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
'JISAFU l';\\f1'JO~h\
I " \ VENUE
I'JTE~SFCTION 1\IPRO\'F'fL
\NIl 1111 KEY BIll 111.\,\RIl
SOUTH AIRPORT !JOUI.I-VAR
I ~
),
TRAFFIC
rH.~(;~F1-'J IJ~IVI ,:-"f1SSION ~OAD FRAFFIC SI(iNA
fiR ,\NIl\'1I W DlnVFd.\S1 I ;~,\NIl \ \TNUE
KI'l(; IJ~I\T JU'lIl'I~O SI ~R,\ IIOUI F\'A~D I ~;\II'11
SI(;N-\I 111'( ;RAIJF & I'JTI,RSFC lION IMI'~O\TMINI S
,\4"~
FSS
, \-1
GA'~ F \\' -\ ~" if?>')l'l J- I,' .\Pf)' F,'\ ~ r (;R '\"\;D
f, r~:\'F'r ,1';, i,'.'P1~1:~1;~: vr "'\;,
;;"~'}l,:'iti' \r,Rr't.}~~ 1 t~O~," :~ \" \'1n N( lH r 11
RO,'\n ~~fF~..'~t-,t TWN l'\tr'HD\T \fF~rt
WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD/C;FU flH "'\;D
OLYMPIC DRIVE TRAFFIC IMPROV[\H.'q
EL CAMINO REAL/ARLINGTON DRIVE FR,\FTIl' SH;'JAl
HICKEY ROULEV ARD INTERCONNECT
2.
3.
5.
.~
-
lilt
JIIC CT,
_. ,.#>
I' ;e',
'@
f.wT AVI.
I
i
r.
.....
T-
,I-
/
1Mt,
".
!
I
I
-
n.- AJ
I.r, :.,.r t
'~. I
\ ,.... ~
" ~,.
(/\ ,
,\5
i \
'P -<ID
.#>
~
lID,
t
!
,
J
I
1'"
-
III
i ~ I.
.-...j II
.'~ ~~.' :.....ll, .
..\~ \\. 'Id.
'\\\11,'
. ~..,),!\\ "11,';"
/\ \
,
I
/'
-If'
0I4f:
-",/
-"';
I
I
er
I
t
I
,
I / ./
". ,...
Jr Jr
... ~~ i l~
I,
~.
I
/
~ ~"'''~ "~.
i 7 " 1 -"'J, .
\' i .;' ~
-..: I
I'
...
J,_..
"
~/A.
~
, ,
~, ~
7 \,
4t,r
.....
,.
I'
';
....
f'
,
. i~"~
'I~!:I', ,
\\'\ "! \ i '.. \ \ '
\., \ ;, } 1
\ .' \ \ i ,II 'y i
\\. ,~\ \ '\i I
.it ,,, f
~". . \< " J'
("'/"'~\ '
V ~. 1,-.
! '\ ~'l ,.1",
'" \ ;--7-" t>/>!,
, , ! 1,'" .. ."
, II,
~L'\, .
~ , " < .'
/ ",
....
~ .. \
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page Traffic
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TRAFFIC
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 11
--
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE , NEW <
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR Apj)I'tOPRIAtJO~
- - -
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATION
1 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC MODEL 81,000 GT 20,000 81,000
(51-13231-0312)
2 WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD/GELLERT AND 210,000 DP 150,000 150,000
OLYMPIC DRIVE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT GT 60,000 60,000
(51-13231-0506)
3 EL CAMINO REAUARLlNGTON DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 19,000 GT 80,000 19,000
(51-13231-0206) RDA 10,000 0
4 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 GT 80,000 0
(51-13231-0012)
5 HICKEY BOULEVARD INTERCONNECT 45,000 GT 45,000 45,000
(51-13231-0507)
6 GATEWAY BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE 217,000 TIF 217,000 217,000
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
(51-13231-0400)
7 OPTICOM SYSTEM 50,000 GTW 95,000 50,000
(51-13231-0208)
8 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/NORTH ACCESS ROAD 20,000 195,000 GT 12,545 12,545
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT DP 7,455 7,455
(51-13231-0602)
9 EVERGREEN DRIVE/MISSION ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 28,000 200,000 GT 25,000 25,000
(51-13231-0603) DP 3,000 3,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL 750,000 475,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 905,000 670,000
-
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PO = PARKING DISTRICT
TDA = TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip fy 06-07
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page 2 - Traffic
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TRAFFIC
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 11
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10- FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE .NE\
- METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR AF'F'ROPIi
- APPROPRIATION
PROJECT COSTS
10 COUNTDOWN PEDESTRIAN UNITS 18,800 GT 10,000 0
(51-13231-0604) TDA 22,000 18,800
11 GRANDVIEW DRIVE/EAST GRAND AVENUE 594,000 TIF 594,000 594,000
(51-13231-0605)
12 TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 GT
(51-13231-0705)
13 KING DRIVE/JUNIPERO SERRA BOULEVARD TRAFFIC 200,000 GT
SIGNAL UPGRADE & INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
14 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT EL CAMINO REAL 35,000 GT
AND HICKEY BOULEVARD
(51-13231-0706)
15 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/UTAH AVENUE 302,000 TIF
(51-13231-0707)
16 AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MILLER AVENUE 349,000 TIF
17 FORBES BOULEVARD/EAST GRAND AVENUE 1,609,000 TIF
18 GRAND/EAST GRAND 565,000 TIF
19 AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND SAN MATEO AVENUE 785,000 TIF
20 AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND GRAND AVENUE 947,000 TIF
21 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD/MITCHELL AVENUE 1,946,000 TIF
AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD
PAGE SUBTOTAL 999,800 1,983,000 790,000 3,703,000 25,000 626,000 612,800
-
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PD = PARKING DISTRICT
TDA = TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip fy 06-07
Traffic
Page 3
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TRAFFIC
1
NEW
APPROPRIATION
ON
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
APPROPRIAT
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
2
0-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
ITEM NO.
PROJECT COSTS
TIF
333,000
BAYSHORElAIRPORT/SISTER CITIES
22
TIF
421,000
ECCLES AVENUE AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
23
TIF
,386,000
SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD HOOK RAMPS
24
TIF
924,000
DUBUQUE AVENUE/OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
25
TIF
609,000
GULL DRIVE AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
26
TIF
,265,000
DUBUQUE AVENUE AND EAST GRAND AVENUE
27
TfF
,942,000
MITCHELL AVENUE
28
GT
2,721,000
HARBOR WAY
29
GT
8,000
BICYCLE DETECTION LOOPS
30
GT
150,000
LINDEN/PINE SIGNAL
31
GT
83,000
01 AND PRODUCE SIGNAL
HIGHWAY
32
GT
50,000
SIGN INVENTORY
33
GT
00,000
MUTCD UPDATE
34
o
o
9,198,000
754,000
00,000
50,000
o
PAGE SUBTOTAL
,282,800
,531,000
9,303,000
4,537,000
970,000
2,508.000
,749,800
TOTAL
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PD = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:lcip 06-07/form_cip fy 06-07
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
TDA = TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
j 'I
, '~
Ii; . f ,
~'l t
I~
I:::
'~~
, f,. J.
I: ,1 I"
i i j" ('~ I
' '~~~~ ".:- I . f .
i, --".:.ii' .6..,
' "!7/~~'i-"""
\:'.i..../ ,
". I
. ,
, "I
~.. i .
Y I
l"" \
-
, .'
/
.....
NFORMATlON TECIINOLOGY
7. HN.\NCE AND 11\'''''':,/ RESOURCES SOfTWAR
....
\
...
,
i
;9,
/
If8. CT,
L
,.--
!
Aloe
I
~
/
-
I'
...
u<<
! ".....
~ *
~ ~
l
\
..."
,
/
-
\
I
\
\
/\-aua
r '
---.-..--\
\
...6...
\
/\
\
/;
~;, /
w ,
~~/ t ,
~~/. 'J'.'" I
"
..
,
I;
, /
I
! I
I
/
i
I
,
,
J
~~,
..
.",-'
......
\,!.J..Ljj J '...) \
< >:,'\. T\ \:.) ,
\ \U..,><~ J
> /'\\(iT \ \Ui ~
';.<\,/\ j'" /..
<v/~/ /.~ ,.::::.~r'[fS~~
V \ '2:-:1 rTrI7>i//
"" If \.' /_"'J ' ! f I ( ~'. .
,~, V:-""i r.J '"
. ~""'~"'<"",
,'., '!'
(.........._!
~,.
nformation Technology
Page
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
11
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
0-
FY
FY09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
ITEM NO.
APPROPRIATION
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
30,000
SE
CI
RDA
TF
50,000
PROJECT COSTS
50,000
50,000
GIS PHASE I
(51-13232-0024)
(PROJECT COST $209,500)
58,000
58,575
CI
25,000
25,000
25,000
58,000
DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING/PURCHASE
(51-16110-0242)
(PROJECT COST
2
8,000
20,000
10,948
25,000
CI
SE
5,000
28,000
$145,400)
FIBER NETWORK
(51-16110-0122)
(PROJECT COST $104,000)
(MFIS)
3
5,000
0,000
CI
0,000
0,000
0,000
5,000
INTRANET WEB PROJECT
(51-16110-0542)
(PROJECT COST $40,000)
4
5,000
5,000
CI
5,000
5,000
LASER FISCHE PHASE
(51-16110-0541)
(PROJECT COST $30,000)
5
25,000
25,000
CS
25,000
25,000
UPGRADE CITY VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
(51-16110-0540)
(PROJECT COST $50,000)
6
21,000
RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
PO = PARKING DISTRICT
PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
ITF = INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
74,523
o
85,000
MA = MEASURE A
GT = GAS TAX
CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
85,000
40,000
GR = GRANTS
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
SW = STORM WATER FUND
B = BONDS
SWASTE = SOLID WASTE
21,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
ANIP = AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
Information Technology
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
11
NEW 1
"PRROPRIATION
o
AVAILABLE
PRIOR YEAR
9
PRIOR
YEAR
8
FUNDING
METHOD
7
6
5
4
3
2
PROJECT NAME & NUMBER
flTEM NO.
10-
FY
FY 09-10
FY 08-09
FY 07-08
FY 06-07
ON
AT
APPROPR
PROJECT COSTS
RDA
EQ
SE
1,180,000
FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES SOFTWARE
(51-16110-0240)
7
o
o
0,000
o
TF
CI
0,000
PERMITTING PROJECT, RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
(51-16110-0640)
(PROJECT COST $ 20,000)
8
CI
10,000
25,000
LASER FICHE AGENDA MANAGER
9
EQ
10,000
10,000
25,000
135,000
PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE MAIN PBX
(51-16110-0740)
10
o
10,000
o
10,000
20,000
60,000
1,315,000
PAGE SUBTOTAL
r
121,000
GENCY
FUND
h:/cip 06-07/cip-fy 06-07
84,523
o
95,000
GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A
TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX
SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND
B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT
ANIP = AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT
105,000
200,000
,436,000
TOTAL
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
DP = DEVELOPER FEES
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE
CG = COMMON GREENS FUND
TIF = INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
~
SF
... ' ' ,1"
.~ \
",~ ~
'\.~. . .1-i>.... ~ (
". i" ~ ~
,/1' -Ie
...., -
- ..... J
~
..'" / ..'"
-
/1' ;0,
.,
~A'"
r. ",.. CT,
...."
*
/
_. -
'./
"",.
r
!
~
I
,
I
~
A~
\
'1
.......
\
\
\~
\
\ .
\
\
\
....\
/'
I
i
;
I
I
;:
t
N
, ~~
~
~~
~-,
...
t
I
NO
01,
.,,,,# I I .
tt-r
~J l f'
~~ . 'to
I:: '
......
.~,
~.t (
~/i' ',~~
I' ~...~
,/' : ~~, ~
, t
\~J/ I
/
I
AT
NS
H/\F
!\IR(
/,
,
...
'1.
\
..
-~.-
ENGINEERING DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Page ANIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 11
-
ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME & NUMBER FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FUNDING PRIOR AVAILABLE NI:.W .
METHOD YEAR PRIOR YEAR . APPROPRIATION
- - -
PROJECT COSTS APPROPRIATION
1 PHASE XVIII 1,250,000 GR 1,500,000
(28-13240-9890)
- -
TOTAL 1,250,000 0 0 0 0
-
CI = CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GR = GRANTS MA = MEASURE A - RDA = REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DP = DEVELOPER FEES TIF = TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE GT = GAS TAX SE = SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
SB = SAN BRUNO SHARE SW = STORM WATER FUND CS = CITY SERVICES FUND PO = PARKING DISTRICT
SFIA = SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT B = BONDS GTW = GATEWAY ASSESSMENT PROP 12 = PROPOSITION 12 GRANT FUNDING
h:/cip 06-07/form_cip fy 06-07
~'t\\ ~
-g
o (")
;... ~
~ (")
t,) 0
~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #13 D
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Elaine Yamani, Director of Human Resources
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING PERSONNEL CHANGES INCLUDING
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS, ADJUSTMENTS TO SALARY
SCHEDULES, AND CHANGES IN UNIT DESIGNATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving personnel changes,
including classification descriptions, adjustments to salary schedules and/or changes to unit
designation for the following positions: Technical Services Supervisor, Public Works
Supervisor (Electrical) and Recreation and Community Services Program Coordinator.
BACKGROUND:
During fiscal year 2005-2006, a study was undertaken of several positions, resulting in recommended
reclassifications, which included: job title changes, adjustments to salary ranges, and unit designation
alteration. The proposed changes are indicated in the included chart. The salary schedule for each
classification is listed in Exhibit A. The salary adjustment recommendation and the new or revised
class description for each classification is in Exhibit B.
Revisions
From Title
Laboratory Supervisor..........
To Title
Technical Services Supervisor
Reason
Reclass recommendation due to
combination of two positions with
distinct responsibilities and minor
overlap resulting in saving the City
an overall amount of $85,000 in
salary and benefit related expenses.
Recommend approval of salary
range, and class description.
Lead and Senior Electrical
Technicians are paid 9% & 8%,
respectively, above the
Public Works Supervisor ..... Public Works Supervisor
(Electrical)
CB-06/07/06
S:\HR Staft\ElainelStaff Reports\Reclass 2005-06IStaff Report-Personnel Changes 2005-06.doc
Staff Report
Subject: Personnel Changes
Page 2
From Title
To Title
Reason
supervisory position. Recommend
reclassification to reflect this
position's greater responsibility
and additional certification
requirement; and to maintain pay
differential between electrical crew
and the supervisor. Recommend
approval of salary range, and class
description.
Reclass recommendation due to
significant increase in enrollment
and consolidation of two sites, both
positions are now performing
parallel duties and responsibilities;
Recommend approval of salary
range, class description, and unit
desi~nation.
Community Services Site Recreation and Community
Coordinator .......................... Services Program Coordinator
By: UbJ- ~
Elaine Yamani
Director of Human Resources
Approve
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A - Salary Schedule
Exhibit B - Class Descriptions for Technical Services Supervisor, Public Works
Supervisor, and Recreation and Community Services Program
Coordinator
RESOLUTION NO._
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PERSONNEL CHANGES,
INCLUDING CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS,
ADJUSTMENTS TO SALARY SCHEDULES, AND
CHANGES IN UNIT DESIGNATIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
The classification descriptions and salary schedule for Technical Services Supervisor, Public
Works Supervisor (Electrical) and Recreation and Community Services Program Coordinator
positions are hereby approved, The salary schedule and class descriptions are attached as Exhibit A
andB.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the _day of
, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of South San Francisco
Exhibit A
Below are the proposed salary ranges for each of the classifications listed in the staff report
requiring the adoption of a new salary range. The salary changes would be effective for the pay
period including July 1, 2006. Please note that these ranges are not inclusive of any COLAs
already agreed-upon by their bargaining unit. In addition, these salary ranges may have some
minor fine-tuning when entered into the payroll system.
Title
Technical Services Supervisor ....... ............ ........................ .....
Public Works Supervisor (Electrical) .....................................
Recreation and Community Services Program Coordinator...
Mid Management Salary Schedule
Monthly Salary Range
$6,845 to $8,319
$6,438 to $7,826
$3,940 to $4,789
CB-06/06/06
C:\Documents and Settings\cbuenaflor\Desktop\Exhibit A Reclass 2005-06 Percentage.doc
Exhibit B
Attachments Class Descriptions for:
1. Technical Services Supervisor
2. Public Works Supervisor (Electrical)
3. Recreation Community Services Program Coordinator
CB-06I06/06 9:32 AM
S:\HR Staft\ElainelStaff Repol1S\Reclass 2005-06\Reclass 2005-06 Exhibit B.doc
City of South San Francisco
Human Resources Department
Technical Services Supervisor
Class Description
Definition
Under direction, supervises all aspects of the operations of the water quality control plant's
laboratory and environmental compliance programs, and does related work as required.
Distinguishing Characteristics
This class is distinguished from all other technical-level classifications through its responsibility
for the supervision of treatment plant laboratory and environmental compliance programs., It is
distinguished from the next higher classification of Assistant Plant Superintendent in that the
latter manages all plant activities.
Typical, and Important Duties
}, Plans, organizes and implements programs relating to laboratory analyses and
environmental compliance, including pretreatment, pollution prevention and stormwater
management.
2. Supervises staff including: scheduling and prioritizing work; training; approval of time off;
employee evaluations; and providing effective input on hiring, disciplinary and other
personnel matters.
3. Insures compliance with safety rules, applicable local, State and Federal regulations and City
policies; prepares attendant reports; and maintains records.
4. Assesses the effectiveness of programs and recommends, or directly implements, changes and
new policies or procedures.
5. Prepares and monitors program budgets.
6. Makes computations of sewer connection fees and other subjects.
7. Maintains liaison with other Department divisions and with other departments and agencies.
8. Serves as the plant, Department or City representative on committees and in interagency
groups.
9. As needed, conducts analyses and makes inspections.
Job-related Qualifications
Knowledge of
· The principles, methods, and techniques of wastewater treatment.
· General concepts and principles of industrial waste discharge and stormwater management.
· Laws and regulations governing assigned programs.
. Chemical, bacteriological, physical, and biological analysis.
· Techniques and terminology used in chemical and related laboratory tasks.
City of South San Francisco
TechnicalSenncesSupennsor
Class Description
Page 2
· Care and use of laboratory equipment.
· Principles of management, supervision, training, and employee relations.
· Safety principles, practices, regulations, and procedures related to the work, including OSHA
regulations.
Ability to:
· .Effectively manage all aspects of assigned programs.
· Assign, direct, review, train and evaluate the work of staff >
· Acquire a thorough knowledge of applicable laws, regulations and City policies; and interpret
and explain same.
· Develop, present and administer program budgets,
· Communicate effectively in writing and verbally. .
· Use initiative and independent judgment within established policy and procedural guidelines.
· Organize own work, set priorities, meet critical deadlines and follow-up on assignments with
a minimum of direction,
· Represent the City and the Department effectively in contacts vvith representatives of other
agencies, City departments and the public,
· Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
· Take a proactive approach to customer service issues.
· Make process improvement changes.
· As necessary, perform chemical, bacteriological, and related laboratory analyses; and conduct
field inspections,
· Insure compliance with plant and field safety rules.
· Keep accurate records and prepare required reports.
Skill in:
· Using personal computers and associated applications.
· Using Microsoft Windows, NT, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, and other software used to
file reports with regulatory agencies electronically.
Experience and Training
Any combination of experience and training that would provide the required knowledge, skills,
and abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge, skills, and abilities
would be:
Experience: Five years of progressively responsible experience in a chemical, bacteriological,
biological, or biochemical laboratory of which three years must be in a wastewater laboratory and
one year with supervisory or lead duties. Additional experience in a pretreatment or stormwater
program is highly desirable.
Education: A Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework
in chemistry, microbiology, biology or a related field.
Licenses and Certificates
All licenses and certificates must be maintained as a condition of employment.
City of South San Francisco
Technical Services Supervisor
Class Description
Page 3
. Possession of, or ability to obtain, an appropriate, valid California driver's license and a
satisfactory driving record.
. Possession of a California Water Environment Association Laboratory Analyst Grade III
Certificate.
. Possession of, or ability to obtain, a California Water Environment Association Laboratory
Analyst Grade N Certificate within the probationary period. Successful completion of
probationary period contingent upon obtaining a CWEA Laboratory Analyst Grade IV
Certificate.
· Possession of, or ability to obtain within one year of employment, a California Water
Environment Association Grade 2 Environmental Compliance Inspector Certificate, A Grade
3 Certificate may be required after a prescribed period depending upon operational needs.
Special Requirements.
Essential duties require the following physical skills and work environment:
Physical Skills: Able to use standard office equipment, including a computer; sit, stand, walk,
kneel, crouch, stoop, squat, crawl, twist, and climb stairs and ladders; lift and carry 35 pounds;
maintain sustained posture for prolonged periods of time; distinguish among various colors;
distinguish various computer generated auditory signals; vision to read printed materials and a
computer screen; hearing and speech to communicate in person, over the telephone, and to make
public presentations; smell to distinguish odors.
Work Environment: Mobility to work in a typical office setting or laboratory environment;
exposure to cold, heat, noise, outdoors, inclement weather, dust, dirt, vibration, chemicals, traffic,
traffic hazards, confming workspace, odors, mechanical hazards, electrical hazards explosive
hazards.
Ability to: Travel to different sites and locations; drive safely to different sites and locations;
maintain a safe driving record; maintain a clean and neat appearance; work shifts including
weekends, nights, and holidays; work protracted and irregular hours; respond to a pager; take 24-
hour call and stand-by; available for unusual hours in emergencies; available for evening
meetings.
Approved:
Revised Date:
Fonner Titles:
Abolished:
Bargaining Unit:
ADA Review:
DOT:
Physical:
Status:
EEOC Category:
Job Code:
Laboratory Supervisor; Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Mid-management
No
Class C
ClassifiedlExempt
EF13\EJ2
W1220
City of South San Francisco
Technical Services Supervisor
Class Description
Page 4
ADA Documentation of Essential Duties
1. SDE
2. SDE
3. SDE
4. MWE
5. MWE
6. SDE
7. SDE
8. SDE
9, SDE
10. OAE
11. OAE
12. OAE
13. OAE
14. MAE
15. SDE
16. SDE
17. SDE
18. OAE
l\muJder\hr-sharedladminlcJass descriptions\public workslwqoplclraft-labol3tOrysupvsr.doc
City of South San Francisco
Human Resources Department
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Definition
Under general direction, performs responsible professional and technical work in promoting,
organizing, and supervising a comprehensive public works program, in such areas as: public
works maintenance, building maintenance, parks maintenance, or the operation of a City garage;
organizes, schedules, and supervises the work of employees engaged in work; and does related
work as assigned.
Distinguishing Characteristics
Tbis multi-position classification performs work in several functional areas and is distinguished
by its core responsibility for supervising employees and programs and activities within the public
works division. Depending upon assignment, work is performed under general direction and
incumbents may provide support for inter-divisional programs and functions. Tbis classification
has full supervisory responsibility for staff at different locations and has full administrative and
fiscal responsibility for specific programs and/or projects. Incumbents perform professional level
activities and have considerable latitude for independent decision making in choosing methods of
developing and implementing approved procedures.
Typical and Important Duties
1. Assists in the planning, coordinating, and supervlsmg the City's public works servlCes
programs in a variety of areas, including:
· Building maintenance for repairing and improving all City buildings, structures and
facilities; inspecting City buildings, structures, and facilities to locate and determine
extent of repair, maintenance, or suggested improvements required; ensuring all routine
and major repairs, replacements, renovations and maintenance plans are completed;
operating a central store with items to be used in all departments; and establishing and
maintaining practices consistent with conservation of energy and natural resources.
· City Garage for developing equipment specifications in conjunction with other City
departmental representatives; conferring with other City staff and suppliers regarding the
purchase and maintenance of all City vehicles and equipment; ensuring all City vebic1es
and equipment are maintained according to standard; inspecting work in progress and
upon completion to ensure conformance to shop standards; providing tec1mical expertise
and assistance to shop staff.
· Parks maintenance for City grounds, recreation facilities, public parks and play areas,
medians, traffic islands, facility landscape, and other maintenance; complying with plans,
specifications and cost estimates relating to the design, installation, and maintenance of
City of South San Francisco
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Page 2
City properties; participating or selecting shrubs, trees, flowers, and grasses to be planted;
assisting in and overseeing repairs of lighting, painting, and irrigation items.
· Public works maintenance for cleaning and maintaining sewer lines and storm drain
systems; maintaining streets, sidewalks, curbs, and drainage facilities; street sweeping
and cleanup; maintaining and altering traffic signal equipment; maintaining street
lighting; painting traffic lines and markings; fabricating and installing traffic signs;
complying with plans, specifications and cost estimates relating to the design, installation,
and maintenance of City properties.
2. Prepares work schedules; assigns work; evaluates, and reviews the work of subordinates;
trains staff in the safe and proper methods of carrying out assigned tasks; and solves difficult
problems encountered by the staff,
3. Determines priority of work to be done and estimates or obtains estimates of repair cost.
4. Ensures that required materials and equipment are available to carry out assigned tasks;
determines stock requirements; ordering parts, supplies, and equipment as needed.
5, Inspects work in progress and upon completion to ensure conformance to established
standards for City grounds, facilities, infrastructures, equipment, and other areas under the
scope of the work assignment to ensure it is properly maintained.
6. Establishes and maintains a variety of paper and electronic records, such as vehicle
replacement accounts and preventive maintenance schedules; building maintenance activity
records.
7. Prepares required reports; makes recommendations on the types of equipment needed for the
program's activities; conducts special studies and prepares reports orally and in writing.
8. May perform the work of the unit under unusual or emergency circumstances.
9. Confers with superiors to discuss work projects and establish priorities.
10. Conducts safety and other training specific to the unit's work; oversees and enforces safe
work practices.
11. Makes effective recommendations concerning employee hiring, promotion, and disciplining.
12. Attends various meetings to provide information relating to the City's overall maintenance ,
sernces programs.
13. Investigates complaints from the public concerning the work unit; takes appropriate action.
14. Assists in the preparation of preliminary budget for the division and controls expenditures.
15. Performs related duties and responsibilities as assigned.
Job-related Qualifications
Depending on the area assigned, the incumbent must have job-related knowledge, abilities, and
skills.
Knowledge of
· Methods, materials, and equipment used for the specific program in the design, construction,
repair, and maintenance of City facilities, programs, and equipment.
· Methods, materials and equipment used in the maintenance of City facilities, parks, and
recreational facilities; characteristics of various plant life, turf, irrigation, and contracts,
City of South San Francisco
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Page 3
· Principals, methods, and practices relating to efficient operation of a building maintenance
program; techniques, methods, services, tools, and materials of building maintenance,
· Principles, methods, and practices pertaining to the operation of an equipment maintenance
facility; tools, lubricants, equipment and procedures used in servicing and repairing a variety
of automotive heavy equipment; principles and methods used in a program of preventive
maintenance.
· Mechanics, uses, and operation of integrated municipal and personal computer systems and
their associated applications,
· Basic construction skills and techniques.
· Safety principles, practices, regulations, and procedures related to the work, including OSHA
regulations.
· Principles and practices of program administration, including budgeting, purchasing, and
personnel management.
· Principles and practices of public administration and human resources as applied to function,
including basic employee-relations concepts.
· Principles of management, supervision, training, and employee development.
Ability to:
· Acquire a thorough knowledge of applicable City, departmental, and divisional policies and
procedures,
· Plan, organize, and supervise the work of subordinate employees.
· Read, interpret, and work from construction plans, specifications, blueprints, diagrams, and
sketches.
· Troubleshoot problems and determine materials and supplies required for maintenance,
repair, and other projects,
· Estimate labor and material costs for proj ects.
· Direct and inspect the technical details involved in landscape work.
· Read, interpret, and accurately apply a variety of federal, state, and local rules and
regulations.
· Provide appropriate advice and assistance on problems to obtain effective results.
· Coordinate various projects with other City employees and public officials,
· Communicate effectively in wliting, orally, and with others to assimilate, understand, and
convey information, in a manner consistent with job functions.
· Keep accurate records and prepare clear and concise oral and written reports.
· Prepare complex reports and analyses; prepare clear, concise, and complete written reports.
· Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with subordinates, other
employees, and the general public.
· Review organizational and administrative problems and recommend and implement an
effective course of action.
· Use English effectively to communicate in person, over the telephone, and in writing.
· Use initiative and independent judgment with established policy and procedural guidelines.
· Organize own work, set priorities, meet critical deadlines, and follow-up on assignments with
a minimum of direction.
· Represent the City and the department effectively in contacts with representatives of other
City of South San Francisco
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Page 4
agencies, City departments, and the public.
· Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of the
work.
· Take a proactive approach to customer service issues.
· Make process improvement changes to streamline procedures; develop and implement
procedures and systems.
· Work in a safe manner, modeling correct City safety practices and procedures; coach others
and enforce adherence to safety police and procedures; identify, correct, and report safety
hazards.
· Maintain confidentiality regarding sensitive information.
Skill in:
· Using a standard computer with speed and accuracy sufficient to perform assigned work.
· Driving a variety of vehicles safely.
Experience and Training
Any combination of experience and training that would provide the required lmowledge, skills,
and abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the lmowledge, skills, and abilities
would be:
Experience: Five years of progressively more responsible journey-level experience in one or
more of the following areas: maintenance and repair of automotive and other heavy equipment,
public works, construction, custodial/building maintenance, parks and general grounds
maintenance including extensive lmowledge and skill in landscape, horticultural, and
arboricultural activities. Two years of this experience must be at least in a lead capacity.
Training: Equivalent to graduation from high school, supplemented by completion of college-
level courses in management and supervision. for certain positions additional training in
mechanical technology or an associate's degree from an accredited college or university with
major coursework in horticulture, arboriculture, construction, or closely related field or
completion of American Public Works Association or International Municipal Signal Association
Classroom Training Programs.
Licenses or Certificates
All licenses and certifications must be maintained as a condition of employment.
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain, an appropriate, valid California driver's license and a
satisfactory driving record.
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain, an appropriate California commercial driver's license.
Those incumbents whose position requires a commercial license must obtain the required
license within six months of appointment.
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain as appropriate, ASE certification.
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain as appropriate, backflow devices certification.
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain as appropriate, pest control advisor certification,
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain as appropriate, confmed space certification.
City of South San Francisco
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Page 5
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain as appropriate, ISMA ill Certification, (Required only
for Supervisor who oversees Electrical crew).
Special Requirements
Essential duties require the following
Physical Skills: Able to use standard office equipment, including a computer; sit, stand, walk,
lmeel, crouch, stoop, squat, twist, and maintain sustained posture in a seated or standing position
for prolonged periods of time; vision to read printed materials and a computer screen; hearing
and speech to communicate in person, over the telephone, and to make public presentations; lift
and carry 75 pound boxes and materials,
Work Environment: Mobility to work in a typical office and/or field setting; exposure to cold,
heat, noise, outdoors, inclement weather, dust, dirt, vibration, chemicals, traffic, traffic hazards,
confining workspace, mechanical hazards, electrical hazards, and explosive hazards.
Ability to: Travel to different sites and locations; drive safely to different sites and locations;
maintain a safe driving record; work protracted and irregular hours and evening meetings or off-
shift work for meeting attendance or participation in specific projects or programs; available for
evening meetings.
Approved:
Revised:
Title Change:
June 1999
May 2002, June 2003, January 2004, June 2005
Maintenance Services Supervisor, Park Supervisor, Garage Supervisor, Public Works
Supervisor, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Park Supervisor abolished June 1999, Garage Supervisor, Public Works Supervisor, and
Building Maintenance Supervisor, abolished March 2002
Mid-management
1999/00,2002,2003,2005
Yes
Class 2
Classified/Exempt
EF6\EJ8
M255
Abolished:
Bargaining Unit:
ADA Review Date:
DOT:
Physical:
Status:
EEOC Category:
Job Code:
ADA Documentation of Essential Duties
1. SDE
2. SDE
3, SDE
4. SDE
5, SDE
6. SDE
7. SDE
8. OAE
9. SDE
10. SDE
11. MAE
12. OAE
13. OAE
City of South San Francisco
Public Works Supervisor
Class Description
Page 6
14. MAE
S:\Admin\Class DescriptionslPublic Works\Maint ServicesIPWSupv,doc
City of South San Francisco
Human Resources Department
Recreation and Community Services Program Coordinator
Class Description
Definition
Under direction, performs responsible administrative, coordinating, and technical duties in one of
the Pre- School or Community Center programs; and does related work as required,
Distinguishing Characteristics
This classification is distinguished from all other classes by its responsibility for the day-to-day
operation of the program and by its coordinating, supervisory, and administrative duties for the
assigned program, Not every position will perfOml each duty indicated below.
Typical and Important Duties
1. Ensures that staff, facilities, and programs are in compliance with County, State, and Federal
requirements and licensing regulations.
2. Supervises and evaluates employees and volunteers; may assist in recruiting, interviewing,
and selecting employees; ensures the orientation of staff to the center's basic philosophy,
policies, and programs.
3 . Works cooperatively with staff, parents, children, school district employees, and other
public- and private-sector staff and volunteers; coordinates with appropriate agencies to
ensure that necessary services are provided to clients.
4. Assists in developing and implementing the day-to-day programs; coordinates the design and
writing of weekly program plans; promotes and publicizes programs.
5. Assists in financial management of the program by preparing budgetary infonnation,
preparing monthly program and :fiscal reports, ensuring monthly billing and maintenance of
financial records, and collecting and depositing revenues.
6. Identifies and provides for staff training, arranges for outside training, as needed
7. Registers participants in programs.
8. Conducts family caregiver education and referrals; monitors client status with physicians and
other service providers; coordinates team care planning.
9. Serves as a liaison to community service networks and/or Friends of Parks and Recreation.
10. Coordinates the scheduling of building for use in classes, meetings, athletic events, rentals,
special events, and allows for appropriate time for maintenance.
11, May set up and take down tables, chairs, gymnastic equipment, nets, and other equipment, as
needed
12. May prepare grant proposals, by investigating available grants, researching the necessary
infomlation for the proposal, and writing the grant
13. Performs related duties and responsibilities as assigned.
City of South San Francisco
Recreation & Community Services Program Coordinator
Class Description
Page 2
Job-related Qualifications
Knowledge of:
· Principles, methods and practices of elementary and pre- school education.
· Psychology as it relates to the instruction of children and adults.
· Principles of supervision, training, and employee development
· Principles and practices of public administration and human resources as applied to function,
including basic employee-relations concepts.
· Management of a child daycare program or a community center.
· Scheduling techniques for facility use and for sports leagues.
· Federal and state regulations as they relate to the specific program.
· Budgeting, accounting, and fiscal record keeping,
· Applicable laws and regulations.
· Computer systems and associated programs.
Ability to:
· Plan, coordinate, and direct the services of a specific program.
· Develop and implement procedures and systems.
· Effectively supervise assigned personnel.
· Display outstanding customer service skills.
· Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course
of work
· Interpret and accurately apply rules and regulations.
· Commllllicate effectively in writing, orally, and with others to assimilate, understand, and
convey information, in a manner consistent with job fimctions.
· Write clear and comprehensive reports.
· Operate a personal computer and its associated programs; use audio-visual equipment
· Work in a safe manner, following City safety practices and procedures and modeling correct
City safety practices and procedures; enforce adherence to safety policies and procedures;
identify, correct, and report safety hazards.
SldlZ in:
· Using a personal computer and associated applications.
Experience and Training
Any combination of experience and training that would provide the required knowledge, skills,
and abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge, skills, and abilities
would be:
Experience:
· For the Pre-School Program: Two years of progressively more responsible experience
teaching in a licensed day care center or comparable childcare program, with at least one year
in a supervisory capacity.
· For the Community Center Program: Two years of progressively more responsible
experience in delivering recreatiOn, leisure, or human service programs.
City of South San Francisco
Recreation & Community Services Program Coordinator
Class Description
Page 3
Training:
· For the Pre-School Program: Equivalent to the graduation from high school and successful
completion of twelve semester units in child growth and development and three units in
administration or staff relations,
· For the Community Center Program: A bachelor's degree in recreation, leisure services, or a
related human services field.
Licens es and Certificates
All licenses and certificates must be maintained as a condition of employment
· Possession of, or the ability to obtain, an appropriate, valid California Driver's license and a
satisfactory driving record.
· Possession of a current first aid and CPR certificate.
Special Requirements
Essential duties require the following physical skills and work environment:
Physical Skills: Ability to sit, stand, walk, nm, knee~ crouch, stoop, squat, twist, climb; mobility
to work in a typical child care and educational setting, use standard educational equipment;
vision to read printed materials; hearing and speech sufficient to communicate in person and over
the telephone; lift and carry 50 pounds of children, materials, boxes, and files.
Work Environment: Work in an indoor and outdoor childcare environment; exposure to noise and
confining workspaces.
Ability to: Travel to different sites and locations; drive safely to different sites and locations;
maintain a safe driving record; maintain a neat and clean appearance. Certain positions must be
able to work flexible hours, including evening and weekends.
Approved:
Revised Date:
Former Titles:
Abolished:
Bargaining Unit:
ADA Review:
DOT:
Physical:
Status:
EEOC Category:
Job Code:
July 1997, July 1999, June 2003
Recreation & Community Services Coordinator
Mid-management
1994/95,2002,2003
No
Class 3
Classified! exempt
EF6\ET5
M530
ADA Documentation of Essential Duties
1. SDE
2. SDE
3. SDE
4. SDE
5. SAE
City of South San Francisco
Recreation & Community Services Program Coordinator
Class Description
Page 4
6. MAE
7. SDE
8. SAE
9. SDE
10. SAE
11. MAE
12. MAE
-
~'t\\ 5:14'
II
o 0
>< ~
~ t')
v 0
~~ Staff Report
A.GENDA ITEM #13 E
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Elaine Yamani, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 3.12 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION
Waive reading and introduce the ordinance, which amends Chapter 3.12 of the South San
Francisco Municipal Code, to implement Council-approved position title additions, deletions,
and/or changes.
BACKGROUND
The Municipal Code, Chapter 3.12 is updated during the budget process and periodically as positions
are renamed, reclassified, developed and/or deleted from the competitive and non-competitive
service. The following changes to the Municipal Code are recommended.
Change in the Municival Code:
From To
Community Services Site Recreation and
Coordinator ......................... Community Services
I Program Coordinator .........
Reason
Title change
reclassification.
as
a
result
of
Add to the Municival Code:
Title
Technical Services
Supervisor. . . . . . , . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ...
Position added to the classified servIce due to
reclassification,
By:
/U-t~ (...4.!h144-v
ElaindJ1amani
Human Resources Director
/~,";
f '
{'" ~"-. 1
. .. 'Vl-J
.,..~,f /
,c~
Ban& M. N~gei
CitYManager
ORDINANCE NO._
CITY COUNCil.., CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3.12,010 OF THE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1,
1. SECTION 3.12.010 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
SUBDNISION (5)
1. Add the position title of "Technical Services Supervisor."
SUBDNISION (6)
1. Delete the position title of "Community Services Site
Coordinator"
2. Add the position title of "Recreation and Community Services Program
Coordinator"
SECTION 2. SEVERABil..ITY
In the event any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional,
such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTNE DATE
This ordinance shall be published once, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for or
against it, in the San Mateo Times. a newspaper of general circulation in the City of South San
Francisco, as required by law, and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.
*
*
*
*
*
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, held
the _day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing Ordinance
this _ day of , 2006.
Mayor
~'t\\ sM
ii
~ . ~~\
(0 C"l
>< ....
~ ~
v c
~lIFO?-~'\'i-.
AGENDA ITEM #14
S taft Report
DATE: June 14,2006
TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council
FROM: Director of Finance
SUBJECT: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER COMPANY RATE INCREASE
FOR 2006-07
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to accept an increase in refuse
collection rates effective July 1, 2006, as submitted by the South San Francisco Scavenger
Company and give the City Manager the authority to authorize a further adjustment to
sludge hauling rates of up to $7.00 per ton after the final landfill disposal rates are known
by the South San Francisco Scavenger Company.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
The City Council approved a franchise agreement with the Scavenger Company of South San
Francisco (the Scavengers) on July 9, 1997. Under the terms of that agreement, the Scavenger's
fees are adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index, and are then adjusted every three years
at a rate not to exceed 95% of the average of 32 cities' fees specified in the agreement. This
methodology ensures that city ratepayers receive refuse service at 5% below average rates.
2006-07 rates fall under the every third year survey provision of the agreement. The Scavenger
Company has obtained a survey of the 32 specified cities' rates, and the results are attached. The
accuracy of those surveyed rates was confirmed by the Public Works and Finance Department
staff via phone calls made to a sampling of the surveyed cities.
Under Section 5.9 of the franchise agreement between the City and the Scavengers, the rate that
the Treatment Plant pays the Scavengers for the removal and hauling of sludge may also be
adjusted annually based on 80% of the change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco
area. That adjustment would therefore be a 2.11 % increase effective July 1, 2006 (80% of
2.64%). The attached resolution approves of this adjustment from $39.62 to $40.46 per ton. This
cost is borne by the Sewer Fund, and ultimately by Sewer ratepayers. The increased fee would
help cover the Scavengers' fuel cost increases.
Staff Report
Subject: South San Francisco Scavenger Company Rate Increase for 2006-07
Page 2
The Scavengers have also been notified by the landfill that receives the Treatment Plant's sludge
that the landfill fee is increasing by up to $7 per ton, after four years of no change. This increase
qualifies as an "Extraordinary Item" under Section 6.3 of the franchise agreement with the
Scavengers. That provision permits additional adjustments to the rates the Scavengers charge, if
any costs the Scavengers pay, including landfill disposal costs, realize an extraordinary increase.
Staff believes this increase qualifies as an extraordinary item.
The final landfill disposal rate is not yet known from the landfill operator, and the Scavengers are
still in discussions with them. In addition, City staff is exploring other options for sludge
hauling. The attached resolution therefore gives the City Manager the authority to approve an
additional increase in sludge disposal fees by an amount not to exceed an additional $7 per ton,
i.e., up to $47.46/ton. Staff will only sign off on the final sludge hauling fee amount after being
assured that all other options have been carefully considered. Again, this cost will be borne by
the Sewer Fund, and will increase costs to the Sewer Fund by up to $67,000 per year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Given all the factors discussed in this report, residential rates will increase by 15.58% for a 20-
gallon residential can customer and 6.72% for a 32-gallon residential can customer. A copy of
the full rate proposal is attached for Council's information. The Sewer Fund will realize higher
sludge disposal fees of up to $67,000 per year as a result of higher sludge disposal fees that the
Scavengers are required to pay.
CONCLUSION:
Approval of the South San Francisco Scavenger Rate Proposal will maintain South San
Francisco rates at 5% below average ofthe 32 cities in the franchise survey.
Prepared by: ~
Jim teele
Dlr ~tor of Finance
Approved b
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A: Proposed Rates for July 1, 2006
Exhibit B: Survey Results
cc: Paul Formosa, South San Francisco Scavenger Company
Terry White, Director of Public Works
RESOLUTION NO._
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUfION ACCEPTING AN INCREASE IN REFUSE
COLLECTION RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006 AS SUBMITTED BY
THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER COMPANY, AND
AUfHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE A FURTHER
ADJUSTMENT TO SLUDGE HAULING RATES
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a new franchise agreement with the South San
Francisco Scavenger Company; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the 1997 agreement, that every third year rate adjustment is
to be based on a survey of 32 specific cities' refuse rates; and
WHEREAS, the agreement stipulates that the maximum amount of the increase be set at
95% of the average of 32 specific cities' rates; and
WHEREAS, the calculations and the rates of selected cities have been verified by Finance
and Public Works' Department staff, and a complete fee schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
and
WHEREAS, landfill fee increases will impact sludge hauling costs for the Scavenger
Company, but the results of cost discussions with the landfill operator are not yet complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco
that the City Council hereby approves the increase in the solid waste disposal and collection fees as
shown in Exhibit A; and
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Manager is hereby authorized to approve a further increase to sludge hauling
fees of not to exceed an additional $7.00/ton over and above the fee shown in Exhibit A provided
that the cost is known by September 30, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Exhibit A: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER CO., INC.
City of South San Francisco
Proposed Fees for Refuse Service, Effective July 1, 2006
Current Proposed
Rates Maximum Rates
Residential Can Service: (per Month)
Proposed change
A. Service Level By Container Volume
20 Gallons $ 13.87 15.58% 16.03
32 Gallons 19.47 6.72% 20.78
64 Gallons 42.84 45.72
96 Gallons 67.17 71.68
128 Gallons or more 93.43 99.71
Commercial Can Service
30 Gallons 17.78 18.70
32 Gallons 18.97 5.17% 19.95
40 Gallons 23.71 24.94
45 Gallons 26.67 28.05
55 Gallons 32.60 34.29
Commercial Compactor Service
Per Cubic Yard 34.55 10.79% 38.28
Debris Box Service, Residential and Commercial
Temporary / One Time Use
5 Yard Mini-box 163.08 191.49
7 Yard 356.31 418.38
14 Yard 356.31 17.42% 418.38
20 Yard 485.14 569.65
30 Yard 699.88 821.80
Regular / Permanent Service
7 Yard 300.61 352.98
14 Yard 300.61 352.98
20 Yard 429.44 504.25
30 Yard 644.17 756.38
Exhibit A: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER CO., INC.
City of South San Francisco
Proposed Fees for Refuse Service, Effective July 1, 2006
Current Proposed
Rates Maximum Rates
Rental Charge (per day, over 7 days) 13.43 15.77
Overweight Charge
Content weight in excess of 3 tons, per tc 83.95 98.57
Commercial Bin Service
A. Regular Pick-up
1 - yard Container 118.69 8.27% 128.51
2 - yard (Front End Loader Bin) 177.98 192.69
3 - yard (Front End Loader Bin) 266.99 289.07
4 - yard (Front End Loader Bin) 355.98 385.42
5 - yard (Front End Loader Bin) 445.00 481.80
6 - yard (Front End Loader Bin) 533.96 578.12
B. On Call Pick-up, Per Yard 20.57 22.27
Per Pick-up, Per Yard
Plus Container Rental Per Month
Rental Charges
1 - yard Container 31.10 33.67
2 - yard Container 33.74 36.53
3 - yard Container 36.22 39.22
4 - yard Container 38.86 42.07
5 - yard Container 44.04 47.68
6 - yard Container 46.71 50.57
Sludge Hauling Per Ton (Treatment Plant) 39.62 40.46
Exhibit B: 2006 Survey and Rate Calculations
CITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
20 Gal 32 Gal 32 Gal 2Yd Compacted Debris box
FEL Cubic Yard 14 cu yd trash
(Adjusted)
Alameda $14.71 $ 23.16 $ 15.17 $175.37 $ 42.50 $ 602.89
Burlingame 6.99 12.92 12.92 163.08 36.38 320.00
Campbell 18.05 12.27 114.62 25.00 498.90
Castro Valley 13.30 19.85 13.61 144.15 30.37 234.23
Cupertino 18.31 16.97 30.18 359.38
Daly City 12.80 16.40 19.28 223.00 41.53 330.00
EI Cerrito 16.27 25.22 25.22 299.82 57.83 660.00
EI Sobrante 22.94 27.44 31.56 304.50 46.23 524.62
Fremont 22.87 23.36 12.77 103.79 42.45 294.52
Gilroy 22.79 22.79 152.69 30.80 371.64
Hayward 11.81 17.27 13.55 129.34 27.59 213.90
Hercules 21.90 25.80 31.19 342.36 46.23 524.62
Los Altos 24.36 23.52 163.28 31.40 570.14
Los Gatos 16.90 14.91 144.11 25.00 461.43
Martinez 17.25 25.44 23.95 205.93 42.29 377.63
Menlo Park 8.48 12.74 13.62 117.13 52.92 370.00
Mil/brae 12.67 20.27 21.18 207.36 52.43 389.22
Monte Sereno 21.71 14.79 166.59 25.00 524.84
Morgan HiI/ 21.54 13.65 169.44 30.80 339.04
Palo Alto 16.87 21.38 21.38 225.91 46.04 500.15
Piedmont 21.02 28.28 22.59 226.02 450.28
Pinole 21.50 25.40 31.05 325.07 46.23 524.62
Pittsburg 20.95 30.25 202.40 34.75 380.00
Richmond 21.35 25.81 31.60 300.26 46.23 524.62
San Bruno 18.34 23.32 222.48 36.21 324.02
San Leandro 14.84 18.49 12.69 163.99 37.11 450.69
San Mateo 8.53 10.50 13.12 140.34 66.97 340.00
San Pablo 20.67 25.15 31.19 325.60 46.23 524.62
Saratoga 18.81 15.99 182.04 29.48 518.94
Sunnyvale 20.58 20.56 145.85 42.34 578.67
Union City 23.30 27.32 20.08 155.59 33.81 236.57
Woodside 12.39 19.72 119.41 22.50 305.00
Average $16.31 $ 21.07 $ 20.22 $195.53 $ 38.87 $ 425.79
95% Of Average $15.49 $ 20.02 $ 19.21 $185.75 $ 36.93 $ 404.50
SSF Present $13.87 $ 19.47 $ 18.97 $177.98 $ 34.55 $ 356.31
Rates
Increase/Decrease 1.62 0.55 0.24 7.77 2.38 48.19
Percent Change 11.68% 2.82% 1.27% 4.37% 6.89% 13.52%
Additional Rate
Adiustments
City Services (1) 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
Franchise Fees (2) 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Total Change 15.58% 6.72% 5.17% 8.27% 10.79% 17.42%
Proposed Rate: $16.03 $ 20.78 $ 19.95 $192.70 $ 38.28 $ 418.38
(1) Per Sections 5.9 and 6.3 of Franchise Agreement
(2) Per Sections 6.3 and 4.1 of Franchise Agreement, w/ amendment based on
June 11, 2003 Council action.
-
G
~ - ~\i..\
(~ C
t:l ~
v c
~l~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM
#15
DATE: June 14, 2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian F. Crossman, Attorney
SUBJECT: APPROVE A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL
HANDBOOK SECTIONS RELATED TO CITY COUNCIL
REORGANIZATION MEETING, C/CAG APPOINTMENTS, PUBLIC
FACILITIES DEDICATION CEREMONY PROTOCOL, RESPONSES TO
CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION, CITY COUNCIL
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICY, AND BOARD AND
COMMISSION MEMBER ABSENCE POLICY.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving amendments to the
City Council Handbook to include policies regarding (1) the Council's reorganization meeting; (2)
appointments through Council of Cities/City Selection Committee; (3) public facilities dedication
protocol; (4) City Council requests for information; (5) reimbursements of Council member expenses;
(6) AB 1234 reimbursement policy; and (7) Boards and Commission member absences.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
At meetings earlier this year, the City Council requested that staff prepare a series of amendments to the City
Council Handbook. The following discussion summarizes the changes and the attached resolution authorizes
the specific changes.
(1) City Council Reorganization Meeting
The City Council requested that the meeting at which the Council selects the Mayor and Vice-Mayor for
the following year be held during the fourth week following the November election date. To that end, the
following paragraph is hereby added to the section titled "CITY COUNCIL" on page 1 of the City
Council Handbook:
The meeting to determine organization or reorganization of the City Council (i.e.,
selection of Mayor and Vice-Mayor) shall be held in the fourth week following a
General Election as defined in Elections Code section 324.
834872-1
(2) Appointments By Council of Cities/City Selection Committee
The following section is hereby added to follow section titled "Procedures for Making Appointments and
Reappointments" on page 25 ofthe City Council Handbook:
Council of Cities/City Selection Committee
On the first vote for a position selected by the Council of Cities/City Selection
Committee, the City's designated representative must vote in accordance with the
City Council's direction. All subsequent votes are left to the discretion of the
designated representative.
(3) Public Facilities Dedication Protocol
The following section is hereby added on page 26 of the City Council Handbook:
COUNCIL POLICY ON DEDICATIONS OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
Dedication of a new public facility shall occur only after the building is completed
and ready for occupancy.
Dedications should recognize the efforts of prior City Councils in designing and
facilitating construction of the public facility.
(4) City Council Requests for Information
The following paragraph shall be added to the end of the "Staff Assistance" section on page 5 of the City
Council Handbook:
Responses to a Councilmember's request for information shall distributed to all
Councilmembers.
(5) Reimbursement Policy for Councilmember Expenses
The section titled "Compensation of Councilmembers" on page 3 ofthe City Council Handbook, is hereby
amended as follows (added text in bold and underlined; deleted text in strikethrough):
Each member of the City Council receives a monthly salary as provided for in the
municipal code, in conformance with the provisions of state law. Salaries are
payable at the same time and in the same manner as salaries are paid to other
officers and employees of the City.
The established salaries are exclusive of any amount payable to each member of the
Council as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the
performance of official duties for the City. Councilmember expenses will be
reimbursed in accordance with the City Council's reimbursement policy.
incorporated herein as Appendix 9.Requests for reimbui"Sement are to be made in
writing and should be supported by receipts, whe-n~ possible, and a short statement
identifying the basis for the claim. There are standard forms for requests for
reimbursement. (See .^..ppendix 3).
834872-1
Travel by auto to meetings, conferences, or seminars when by private vehicle, is
reimbursed at a rate equal to the mileage rate paid by the City to its employees.
The City will pay for round trip coach flights if necessary funds are approved by the
Council and the purpose of the trip is official city business.
Registration fees, lodging, meals and related costs incurred in connection with
approyed and pertinent meetings, confe-l"ences or seminars will be reimbursed in the
same manne-l" as for city employees.
Councilmembers are members ofthe Public Employee's Retirement System and
also receive Social Security coverage during their term of office. They also are
provided with various insurance benefits. (See Appendix 4 for a summary of
benefits)
(6) Pursuant to the AB 1234, Appendix 9 is hereby added to the City Council Handbook and shall read as
follows:
CITY COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING
REIMBURSEMENT OF COUNCILMEMBER EXPENSES
AUTHORIZED EXPENSES
City funds, equipment, supplies (including letterhead), titles, and staff time must only be used for
authorized City business. Expenses incurred in connection with the following types of activities
generally constitute authorized expenses, as long as the other requirements of this policy are met:
(1) Communicating with representatives of regional, state and national government on City
adopted policy positions; (2) Attending educational seminars designed to improve officials' skill
and information levels; (3) Participating in regional, state and national organizations whose
activities affect the City's interests; (4) Recognizing service to the City (for example, thanking a
longtime employee with a retirement gift or celebration of nominal value and cost); (5) Attending
City events; (6) Implementing a City-approved strategy for attracting or retaining businesses to the
City, which will typically involve at least one staff member; and (7) Meetings such as those listed
above for which a meeting stipend is expressly authorized under this policy.
All other expenditures require prior approval by the City governing body.
Examples of personal expenses that the City will not reimburse include, but are not limited to: (1)
The personal portion of any trip, including meals, lodging, and other incidental expenses; (2)
Political or charitable contributions or events; (3) Family expenses, excluding spouse or significant
other's registration or meal expenses when accompanying Councilmember on City-related
business within San Mateo County; (4) Entertainment expenses, including theater, movies (either
in-room or at the theater), sporting events (including gym, massage and/or golf related expenses),
or other cultural events; (5) Non-mileage personal automobile expenses, including repairs, traffic
citations, insurance or gasoline; (6) Costs of alcoholic beverages and (7) Personal losses incurred
while on City business. Any questions regarding the propriety of a particular type of expense
should be resolved by the City Council before the expense is incurred.
834872-1
COST CONTROL
To conserve City resources and keep expenses within community standards for public officials,
expenditures should adhere to the following guidelines. In the event that expenses are incurred
which exceed these guidelines, the cost borne or reimbursed by the City will be limited to the costs
that fall within the guidelines.
TRANSPORT A TION
The most economical mode and class of transportation reasonably consistent with scheduling
needs and cargo space requirements must be used, using the most direct and time-efficient route.
Charges for rental vehicles may be reimbursed under this provision if more than one
Councilmernber is attending an out of town conference, and it is determined that sharing a rental
vehicle is more economical than other forms of transportation. In making such determination, the
cost of the rental vehicle, parking and gasoline will be compared to the combined cost of such
other forms of transportation. Government and group rates must be used when available.
Airfare. When possible, Councilmembers should arrange for air travel to be paid for in advance
by the City at the most economical and reasonable round-trip fare consistent with the
Councilmember's scheduling needs. If advance arrangements cannot be made due to lack of
advance warning or other extenuating circumstances, Councilmember's may be reimbursed for the
expense of the airfare, so long as it is the most economical and reasonable round-trip fare
consistent with the member or employee's scheduling needs.
Automobile. Councilmembers shall use City vehicles for travel in performance of official duties,
when available. If a City vehicle is unavailable Councilmembers may be reimbursed for expenses
incurred in traveling by personal vehicle on official business at the annual Internal Revenue
Service Standard Mileage Rate. The distance oftravel will start from the place of work or from
home, whichever is closer to the destination point of official business. Reimbursement shall
include road and bridge tolls. Councilmernbers shall be responsible for procuring and maintaining
liability insurance for their personal vehicles.
Car Rental. Councilmembers should arrange for car rentals to be paid for in advance by the City
at the most economical rate available. If advance arrangements cannot be made due to lack of
advance warning or other extenuating circumstances, Councilmembers may be reimbursed for the
expense of car rental. Since the City is self-insured, Councilmembers shall not be reimbursed for
optional liability insurance or other fees.
Taxis/Shuttles. Taxis or shuttles fares may be reimbursed, including a 15 percent gratuity per
fare, when the cost of such fares is equal or less than the cost of car rentals, gasoline and parking
combined, or when such transportation is necessary for time-efficiency.
LODGING
Lodging expenses will be reimbursed or paid for when the location of the official City business is
greater than 50 miles from the Councilmernber's work or home, whichever is closer to the
destination.
When possible, Councilmembers should arrange for lodging expenses to be paid in advance by the
City at the most economical and reasonable rates for single occupancy lodging that is in a location
834872-1
that is reasonable and convenient in relation to the Councilmember's scheduling and official
business needs.
Conferences/Meetings. If such lodging is in connection with a conference, lodging expenses must
not exceed the group rate published by the conference sponsor for the meeting in question if such
rates are available at the time of booking.
Other Lodging. Travelers must request government rates, when available. Lodging rates that are
equal or less to government rates are presumed to be reasonable and hence reimbursable for
purposes ofthis policy. Actual lodging costs that exceed the government rate for the area may be
reimbursed conditioned upon performance of a good faith effort, evidenced by documentation
(e.g., internet search, phone calls) that demonstrate an attempt to find median-priced lodging.
MEALS
Councilmembers may be reimbursed for expenses incurred for meals consumed in conjunction with
travel on official business. Reimbursable meal expenses and associated gratuities will not exceed the
following rates:
Breakfast $12
Lunch $18
Dinner $40
Such amounts will be annually adjusted to reflect changes in the cost ofliving in accordance with
statistics published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Consumer Price Index, all urban consumers for the San Francisco Metropolitan Area. (The annual
adjustment will be based on this area whether travel is within the area or not.)
If a meal is provided by a conference or organized educational activity, or otherwise included in
the payment of registration fees, Councilmembers may not be reimbursed for meals purchased in
lieu of, or in addition to, the provided meal.
Meal expenses incurred by a Councilmember's spouse or immediate family shall not be
reimbursed, except where the meal is part of an event or function located in San Mateo County at
which the Councilmember is performing his or her official duties, and the spouse or significant
other's attendance at the meal is appropriate given the prevailing business practices.
ADDITIONAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Councilmembers may be reimbursed for actual and necessary incidental expenses incurred in
connection with a conference, organized educational activity, or other performance of official
duties. Incidental expenses include reasonable gratuities for hotel and airline employees, baggage
fees, parking fees, cab fares, public transportation costs, tolls, telephone calls, telegrams, faxing,
and special delivery services related to the performance of official duties, telephone calls of a
personal nature, hotel internet charges, and other such incidental expenses. Councilmembers may
be reimbursed for such incidental expenses related to reasonable gratuities for which receipts are
not customarily given.
834872-1
Reimbursement for expenses incurred in placing telephone calls of a personal nature shall be
limited to $10 per day for travel within California, and $20 per day for travel outside of California.
All other actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties that are not
described in this Policy shall not be reimbursed unless approved before the expense is incurred.
PROHIBITED EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
Councilmembers shall not be reimbursed for non-business expenses including, but not limited to,
entertainment expenses such as movie rental fees, theater tickets or sporting event fees, fines for
parking citations, laundry, replacement fees for lost keys, fees assessed for damage to lodging
premises, and expenses incurred pursuant to personal portions of business travel, including extra
lodging and meals.
EXPENSE REPORT CONTENT AND SUBMISSION DEADLINE
All Councilmember expense reimbursement requests must be submitted on the Expense
Reimbursement Form found in Appendix 3 of this Handbook
Expense reports must document that the expense in question met the requirements of this policy.
For example, if the meeting is with a legislator, the local agency official should explain whose
meals were purchased, what issues were discussed and how those relate to the City's adopted
legislative positions and priorities.
Councilmembers must submit their expense reports within 30 days of an expense being incurred,
accompanied by receipts documenting each expense. Restaurant receipts, in addition to any credit
card receipts, are also part of the necessary documentation.
Inability to provide such documentation in a timely fashion may result in the expense being borne
by the Councilmember.
Audits Of Expense Reports. All expenses are subject to verification that they comply with this
policy.
Reports To Governing Board. At the following City governing body meeting, each official shall
briefly report on meetings attended at City expense. If multiple Councilmembers attended, a joint
report may be made.
Compliance With Laws. Councilmembers should keep in mind that some expenditures may be
subject to reporting under the Political Reform Act and other laws. All agency expenditures are
public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, among other laws.
Violation Of This Policy. Use of public resources or falsifying expense reports in violation of this
policy may result in any or all of the following: (1) loss of reimbursement privileges; (2) a demand
for restitution to the City; (3) the agency's reporting the expenses as income to the elected official
to state and federal tax authorities; (4) civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day and three times the
value of the resources used; and (5) prosecution for misuse of public resources.
END OF PROPOSED APPENDIX 9
834872-1
(7) Boards and Commission Member Absences
Paragraph #4 under "Procedures for Making Appointments and Reappointments," page 25 of the South
San Francisco City Council handbook, is hereby amended to read as follows (added text in bold and
underlined; deleted text in strikethrough):
Vacancies in any board or commission are filled by appointment in the same
manner as original appointment. When a vacancy occurs leaving an unexpired
portion of the term, any appointment is for the unexpired portion of the term. +he
Council may remove a commissioner and declare the position vacant if the
commissioner misses three consecutive regular meetings or more than one third of
the regular meetings within any twelve month period, or is remoyed by majority
vote of the Council. The interest of the City is served best by actual and regular
participation by Board and Commission members. Thus. upon the second
absence from a regular meetin2 within any rolling twelve-month period. a
member shall receive a written communication from the Mayor advising of the
potential consequences of a third absence within the rolling twelve-month
period. Any member of an appointed Board or Commission missin2 a third
scheduled meeting within any rolling twelve-month period shall have his or her
name automatically placed on the next regularly-scheduled City Council
a2enda for consideration of possible removal from the board or commission.
The preceding procedures shall not apply to non-voting emeritus members of
appointed Boards and Commissions. Any member of an appointive Board or
Commission may also be removed by simple majority vote of the City Council.
By:
ILL t~~tc::-;:---~---
Steven T. Mattas, City AtMrney
834872-1
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL HANDBOOK
SECTIONS RELATED TO CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
MEETING, C/CAG APPOINTMENTS, PUBLIC FACILITIES
DEDICATION CEREMONY PROTOCOL, RESPONSES TO CITY
COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION, CITY COUNCIL EXPENSE
REIMBURSEMENT POLICY, AND BOARD AND COMMISSION
MEMBER ABSENCE POLICY.
WHEREAS, at a special meeting of the City Council held on January 7, 2006, the City
Council directed staff to prepare amendments to the City Council Handbook regarding the City
Council reorganization meeting; appointments through the Council of Cities/City Selection
Committee; public facilities dedication protocol; and responses to City Council requests for
information; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has requested adoption of a Handbook amendment regarding a
policy for reimbursement of Councilmember expenses; and
WHEREAS, at a special meeting of the City Council held on April 19, 2006, the City
Council directed staff to prepare amendments to the City Council Handbook regarding procedures
and policies for attendance at Board and Commission meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the following amendments to the City Council
Handbook:
(1) City Council Reorganization Meeting
The following paragraph is hereby added to the section titled "CITY COUNCIL" on page lof
the City Council Handbook:
The meeting to determine organization or reorganization of the City Council
(i.e., selection of Mayor and Vice-Mayor) shall be held in the fourth week
following a General Election as defined in Elections Code section 324.
(2) Appointments By Council of Cities/City Selection Committee
The following section is hereby added to follow section titled "Procedures for Making
Appointments and Reappointments" on page 25 of the City Council Handbook:
Council of Cities/City Selection Committee
On the first vote for a position selected by the Council of Cities/City Selection
Committee, the City's designated representative must vote in accordance with
the City Council's direction. All subsequent votes are left to the discretion of
the designated representative.
(3) Public Facilities Dedication Protocol
The following section is hereby added on page 26 of the City Council Handbook:
COUNCIL POLICY ON DEDICATIONS OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
Dedication of a new public facility shall occur only after the building is
completed and ready for occupancy.
Dedications should recognize the efforts of prior City Councils in designing
and facilitating construction ofthe public facility.
(4) City Council Requests for Information
The following paragraph shall be added to the end of the "Staff Assistance" section on page 5 of
the City Council Handbook:
Responses to a Councilmember's request for information shall distributed to
all Councilmembers.
(5) Reimbursement Policy for Councilmember Expenses
The section titled "Compensation of Councilmembers" on page 3 ofthe City Council Handbook,
is hereby amended as follows (added text in bold and underlined; deleted text in
strikethrough):
Each member ofthe City Council receives a monthly salary as provided for in
the municipal code, in conformance with the provisions of state law. Salaries
are payable at the same time and in the same manner as salaries are paid to
other officers and employees of the City.
The established salaries are exclusive of any amount payable to each member
of the Council as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in
the performance of official duties for the City. Councilmember expenses
will be reimbursed in accordance with the City Council's reimbursement
policy. incorporated herein as Appendix 9.Requests for reimbursement are
to be made in writing and should be supported by receipts, 'l.'here possible,
and a short statement identifying the basis for the claim. There are standard
forms for requests for reimbursement. (See }~ppendix 3).
Travel by auto to meetings, conferences, or seminars when by private vehicle,
is reimbursed at a rate equal to the mileage rate paid by the City to its
employees.
The City 'Jlill pay for round trip coach flights if necessary funds are approved
by the Council and the purpose of the trip is official city business.
Registration fees, lodging, meals and related costs incurred in connection v/ith
approved and pertinent meetings, conferences or seminars '1Iill be reimbursed
in the same mar.ner as for city employees.
Councilmembers are members of the Public Employee's Retirement System
and also receive Social Security coverage during their term of office. They
also are provided with various insurance benefits. (See Appendix 4 for a
summary of benefits)
(6) Pursuant to the AB 1234, Appendix 9 is hereby added to the City Council Handbook and shall
read as follows:
CITY COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING
REIMBURSEMENT OF COUNCILMEMBER EXPENSES
Authorized Expenses
City funds, equipment, supplies (including letterhead), titles, and staff time must only be
used for authorized City business. Expenses incurred in connection with the following
types of activities generally constitute authorized expenses, as long as the other
requirements of this policy are met: (1) Communicating with representatives of regional,
state and national government on City adopted policy positions; (2) Attending
educational seminars designed to improve officials' skill and information levels; (3)
Participating in regional, state and national organizations whose activities affect the
City's interests; (4) Recognizing service to the City (for example, thanking a longtime
employee with a retirement gift or celebration of nominal value and cost); (5) Attending
City events; (6) Implementing a City-approved strategy for attracting or retaining
businesses to the City, which will typically involve at least one staff member; and (7)
Meetings such as those listed above for which a meeting stipend is expressly authorized
under this policy.
All other expenditures require prior approval by the City governing body.
Examples of personal expenses that the City will not reimburse include, but are not
limited to: (1) The personal portion of any trip, including meals, lodging, and other
incidental expenses; (2) Political or charitable contributions or events; (3) Family
expenses, excluding spouse or significant other's registration or meal expenses when
accompanying Councilmember on City-related business within San Mateo County; (4)
Entertainment expenses, including theater, movies (either in-room or at the theater),
sporting events (including gym, massage and/or golf related expenses), or other cultural
events; (5) Non-mileage personal automobile expenses, including repairs, traffic citations,
insurance or gasoline; (6) Costs of alcoholic beverages and (7) Personal losses incurred
while on City business. Any questions regarding the propriety of a particular type of
expense should be resolved by the City Council before the expense is incurred.
Cost Control
To conserve City resources and keep expenses within community standards for public
officials, expenditures should adhere to the following guidelines. In the event that
expenses are incurred
which exceed these guidelines, the cost borne or reimbursed by the City will be limited to
the costs that fall within the guidelines.
Transportation
The most economical mode and class of transportation reasonably consistent with
scheduling needs and cargo space requirements must be used, using the most direct and
time-efficient route. Charges for rental vehicles may be reimbursed under this provision if
more than one Councilmember is attending an out of town conference, and it is
determined that sharing a rental vehicle is more economical than other forms of
transportation. In making such determination, the cost of the rental vehicle, parking and
gasoline will be compared to the combined cost of such other forms of transportation.
Government and group rates must be used when available.
Airfare. When possible, Councilmembers should arrange for air travel to be paid for in
advance by the City at the most economical and reasonable round-trip fare consistent
with the Councilmember's scheduling needs. If advance arrangements cannot be made
due to lack of advance warning or other extenuating circumstances, Councilmember's
may be reimbursed for the
expense of the airfare, so long as it is the most economical and reasonable round-trip fare
consistent with the member or employee's scheduling needs.
Automobile. Councilmembers shall use City vehicles for travel in performance of
official duties, when available. If a City vehicle is unavailable Councilmembers may be
reimbursed for expenses incurred in traveling by personal vehicle on official business at
the annual Internal Revenue Service Standard Mileage Rate. The distance of travel will
start from the place of work or from home, whichever is closer to the destination point of
official business. Reimbursement shall include road and bridge tolls. Councilmembers
shall be responsible for procuring and maintaining liability insurance for their personal
vehicles.
Car Rental. Councilmembers should arrange for car rentals to be paid for in advance by
the City at the most economical rate available. If advance arrangements cannot be made
due to lack of advance warning or other extenuating circumstances, Councilmembers may
be reimbursed for the expense of car rental. Since the City is self-insured,
Councilmembers shall not be reimbursed for optional liability insurance or other fees.
Taxis/Shuttles. Taxis or shuttles fares may be reimbursed, including a 15 percent
gratuity per fare, when the cost of such fares is equal or less than the cost of car rentals,
gasoline and parking combined, or when such transportation is necessary for time-
efficiency.
Lodging
Lodging expenses will be reimbursed or paid for when the location of the official City
business is greater than 50 miles from the Councilmember's work or home, whichever is
closer to the destination.
When possible, Councilmembers should arrange for lodging expenses to be paid in
advance by the City at the most economical and reasonable rates for single occupancy
lodging that is in a location
that is reasonable and convenient in relation to the Councilmember's scheduling and
official business needs.
Conferences/Meetings. If such lodging is in connection with a conference, lodging
expenses must not exceed the group rate published by the conference sponsor for the
meeting in question if such rates are available at the time of booking.
Other Lodging. Travelers must request government rates, when available. Lodging
rates that are equal or less to government rates are presumed to be reasonable and hence
reimbursable for purposes ofthis policy. Actual lodging costs that exceed the government
rate for the area may be reimbursed conditioned upon performance of a good faith effort,
evidenced by documentation (e.g., internet search, phone calls) that demonstrate an
attempt to find median-priced lodging.
Meals
Councilmembers may be reimbursed for expenses incurred for meals consumed in
conjunction with
travel on official business. Reimbursable meal expenses and associated gratuities will not
exceed the following rates:
Breakfast $12
Lunch $18
Dinner $40
Such amounts will be annually adjusted to reflect changes in the cost of living in
accordance with statistics published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index, all urban consumers for the San Francisco
Metropolitan Area. (The annual adjustment will be based on this area whether travel is
within the area or not.)
If a meal is provided by a conference or organized educational activity, or otherwise
included in the payment of registration fees, Councilmembers may not be reimbursed for
meals purchased in lieu of, or in addition to, the provided meal.
Meal expenses incurred by a Councilmember's spouse or immediate family shall not be
reimbursed, except where the meal is part of an event or function located in San Mateo
County at which the Councilmernber is performing his or her official duties, and the
spouse or significant other's attendance at the meal is appropriate given the prevailing
business practices.
Additional Incidental Expense Reimbursement
Councilmembers may be reimbursed for actual and necessary incidental expenses
incurred in connection with a conference, organized educational activity, or other
performance of official duties. Incidental expenses include reasonable gratuities for hotel
and airline employees, baggage fees, parking fees, cab fares, public transportation costs,
tolls, telephone calls, telegrams, faxing, and special delivery services related to the
performance of official duties, telephone calls of a personal nature, hotel internet charges,
and other such incidental expenses. Councilmembers may be reimbursed for such
incidental expenses related to reasonable gratuities for which receipts are not customarily
gIVen.
Reimbursement for expenses incurred in placing telephone calls of a personal nature shall
be limited to $10 per day for travel within California, and $20 per day for travel outside
of California.
All other actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties that
are not described in this Policy shall not be reimbursed unless approved before the
expense is incurred.
Prohibited Expense Reimbursements
Councilmembers shall not be reimbursed for non-business expenses including, but not
limited to, entertainment expenses such as movie rental fees, theater tickets or sporting
event fees, fines for parking citations, laundry, replacement fees for lost keys, fees
assessed for damage to lodging premises, and expenses incurred pursuant to personal
portions of business travel, including extra lodging and meals.
Expense Report Content And Submission Deadline
All Councilmember expense reimbursement requests must be submitted on the Expense
Reimbursement Form found in Appendix 3 of this Handbook
Expense reports must document that the expense in question met the requirements of this
policy. For example, if the meeting is with a legislator, the local agency official should
explain whose meals were purchased, what issues were discussed and how those relate to
the City's adopted legislative positions and priorities.
Councilmembers must submit their expense reports within 30 days of an expense being
incurred, accompanied by receipts documenting each expense. Restaurant receipts, in
addition to any credit card receipts, are also part of the necessary documentation.
Inability to provide such documentation in a timely fashion may result in the expense
being borne by the Councilmember.
Audits Of Expense Reports. All expenses are subject to verification that they comply
with this policy.
Reports To Governing Board. At the following City governing body meeting, each
official shall briefly report on meetings attended at City expense. If multiple
Councilmembers attended, a joint report may be made.
Compliance With Laws. Councilmembers should keep in mind that some expenditures
may be subject to reporting under the Political Reform Act and other laws. All agency
expenditures are public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act,
among other laws.
Violation Of This Policy. Use of public resources or falsifying expense reports in
violation of this policy may result in any or all of the following: (1) loss of
reimbursement privileges; (2) a demand for restitution to the City; (3) the agency's
reporting the expenses as income to the elected official to state and federal tax authorities;
(4) civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day and three times the value of the resources used;
and (5) prosecution for misuse of public resources.
END OF PROPOSED APPENDIX 9
(7) Boards and Commission Member Absences
Paragraph #4 under "Procedures for Making Appointments and Reappointments," page 25 of the
South San Francisco City Council handbook, is hereby amended to read as follows (added text
in bold and underlined; deleted text in strikethrough):
Vacancies in any board or commission are filled by appointment in the same
manner as original appointment. When a vacancy occurs leaving an unexpired
portion of the term, any appointment is for the unexpired portion of the term.
The Council may remove a commissioner and declare the position vacant if
the commissioner misses three consecutive regular meetings or more than one
third ofthe regular meetings within any tV/elve month period, or is removed
by majority vote of the Council. The interest of the City is served best by
actual and regular participation by Board and Commission members.
Thus. upon the second absence from a regular meeting within any rolling
twelve-month period. a member shall receive a written communication
from the Mayor advisin2 of the potential consequences of a third absence
within the rolling twelve-month period. Any member of an appointed
Board or Commission missing a third scheduled meetin2 within any
rolling twelve-month period shall have his or her name automatically
placed on the next regularly-scheduled City Council agenda for
consideration of possible removal from the board or commission.
The preceding procedures shall not apply to non-votin2 emeritus
members of appointed Boards and Commissions. Any member of an
appointive Board or Commission may also be removed by simple
maiority vote of the City Council.
* * * * * *
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
_ day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
834620_1
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Confidential Attorney Client Communication
DATE: June 9,2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian Crossman, Attorney
SUBJECT: Reimbursement Policy to be Included in City Council Handbook
ISSUE
In accordance with California law, what expenses incurred by City Council members may be
reimbursed by the City? Specifically, may the City legally reimburse City Council members for
the following expenses incurred in the course of their official duties:
(I) Expenses incurred for alcoholic beverages;
(2) Meals and related expenses for spouses, significant others, and partners of City
Council members;
(3) Meals, lodging and related expenses for extra or personal travel days beyond what is
required as part of a Council member's official duties, should the Council member
choose to arrive early or stay late;
BRIEF ANSWER
Under State law, cities are only authorized to reimburse city council members for actual and
necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their official duties, with significant
discretion left to the judgment of city councils.
(1) None of the reimbursement policies reviewed for this memo reimbursed alcoholic
beverages, however, it is not strictly prohibited. Limited alcohol expenses may be
reimbursed, provided such expenses are consistent with prevailing business practices;
(2) Meals and related expenses for spouses, significant others, and partners of City
Council members may be reimbursed, provided the meal is part of an event or
function at which the council member is performing his or her official duties, and the
spouse or significant other's attendance at the meal is appropriate given the prevailing
business practices;
SUBJECT:
PAGE:
June 9, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian Crossman, Attorney
Reimbursement Policy to be Included in City Council Handbook
2
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
(3) Meals, lodging and related expenses for extra or personal travel days that are not
necessary to the performance of official duties and therefore may not be reimbursed.
ANALYSIS
Background
Assembly Bill 1234, also know as the "Local Government Sunshine Bill," authorizes local
agencies to reimburse members of a legislative body for expenses "relating to travel, meals,
lodging, and other actual and necessary expenses."l While the "actual and necessary" language
has long been a part of the Government Code,2 AB 1234 additionally requires that local agencies
that provide such reimbursements to elected and appointed officials, must adopt a reimbursement
policy specifying when such expenses are "necessary." Expenses not covered by agencts
adopted plan, must be approved in advance by the governing body at a public meeting.
Actual and Necessary Expenses
The statute does not further define what constitutes a "necessary" expense, nor have the
California courts had an opportunity to interpret the AB 1234 language. A 1982 Attorney
General opinion interpreted the "actual and necessary" language of Code, however.4 In defining
necessary expenses, the Attorney General noted that there "must be some connection between
the services being reimbursed and the performance of official duties to make the services
'necessary' thereto."s While an absolute necessity is not required-as such a strict requirement
would preclude reimbursement for meals and lodging-"a practical need based on the prevailing
business practices" is required.6 Further determination of what expenses are necessary is left to
the sound discretion and judgment of city councils.7
1. Alcoholic Beverages
Neither state law, California case law, nor the opinions of the Attorney General strictly prohibit
reimbursement of alcohol expenses incurred by council members in the performance of their
official duties. As noted in the 1982 Attorney General Opinion, the standard for the necessity of
an expense reimbursement is "a practical need based on the prevailing business practices."
Defining the scope of this standard necessarily requires a judgment decision. Given that alcohol
expenses are not strictly prohibited, it could be argued that allocating a single alcoholic beverage,
or perhaps a maximum dollar amount, per meal would be consistent with the "practical need
based on the prevailing business practices" standard. It should be noted however, that many of
the city reimbursement policies reviewed for preparation of this memorandum expressly stated
1 Gov. Code ~ 53232.2(b). All statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise indicated.
2 See id. ~ 36514.5.
3 Id. ~ 53232.2(f).
465 Ops.CaI.Atty.Gen. 517
5Id.
6Id.
7 !d.
820414-3
SUBJECT:
PAGE:
June 9, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian Crossman, Attorney
Reimbursement Policy to be Included in City Council Handbook
3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
that alcohol expenses were not reimbursable. If, however, the City chooses to reimburse alcohol
expenses, it should limit reimbursable expenses, and be clear as to what extent such expenses
will be reimbursed, so as not to offend the standard. One option might be to reimburse one
alcoholic drink per dinner. The policy as proposed does not allow for reimbursement of cost for
alcoholic beverages.
2. Meals for Spouses & Significant Others
While the 1982 Attorney General opinion is clear that council members' meals are reimbursable
as a practical necessity, the Opinion is silent as to meals and other incidental expenses incurred
by a council member's spouse or significant other. Generally, such expenses are not
reimbursable, as they are not a practical necessity to the performance of the council member's
official duties. Where, however, the meal is part of an event or function at which the council
member is performing his or her official duties, and the spouse or significant other's attendance
at the meal is appropriate given the prevailing business practices, the spouse or significant
other's meal may be reimbursed as well.
3. Extra Lodging
Whether a city may reimburse council members for lodging expenses incurred as personal time
beyond the performance of official duties also turns on the "actual and necessary" standard.
Much like alcohol and spousal expenses, personal lodging expenses are not necessary to the
performance of a council member's official duties. Therefore, while a city may reimburse a
council member for travel to an from official business, as well as lodging while conducting
official business, should the council member choose to stay longer than required, the city may
not reimburse the council member for lodging or other incidental expenses incurred during this
period.
CONCLUSION
A city may reimburse its city council members for "actual and necessary" expenses incurred in
the performance of their official duties. The scope of "actual and necessary" expenses has not
been well-defined by statute or case law, though attorney general opinions suggests it includes
those expenses that bear some connection between the services being reimbursed and the
performance of official duties. The precise scope is left to the sound discretion and judgment of
city councils. The "actual and necessary" standard does not specifically exclude reimbursement
for alcoholic beverages, though many cities have elected not to reimburse these expenses. A city
wishing to provide some reimbursement for alcoholic beverages should appropriately limit the
language oftheir reimbursement policy to reflect the "prevailing business practices standard."
Such a limitation may take the form of a monetary limit or a limit of one alcoholic beverage per
reimbursable dinner.
A city may reimburse meal expenses for the council member's spouse or significant other,
provided the meal is part of an event or function at which the council member is performing his
820414-3
SUBJECT:
PAGE:
June 9, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian Crossman, Attorney
Reimbursement Policy to be Included in City Council Handbook
4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
or her official duties, and the spouse or significant other's attendance at the meal is appropriate
given the prevailing business practices. A city may not reimburse extra lodging or incidental
expenses incurred outside ofthe business portion of a council member's travel. If a council
member chooses to extend a business trip, expenses incurred during the extension are personal
expenses not necessary to the performance of duties, and therefore may not be reimbursed.
820414-3