The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-04-01 e-packet@1:00Friday, April 1, 2022 1:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA TELECONFERENCE MEETING City Council Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee Special Meeting Agenda April 1, 2022City Council Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee Special Meeting Agenda TELECONFERENCE MEETING NOTICE The Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee may meet by teleconference, consistent with the Brown Act as amended by AB 361 (2021). Under the amended rules, the City will not provide a physical location for members of the public to participate in the teleconference meeting. The purpose of conducting the meeting as described in this notice is to provide the safest environment for staff and the public while allowing for public participation. Councilmembers Coleman and Flores and essential City staff will participate via Teleconference. PURSUANT TO RALPH M. BROWN ACT, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, ALL VOTES SHALL BE BY ROLL CALL DUE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS PARTICIPATING BY TELECONFERENCE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY VIEW A VIDEO BROADCAST OF THE MEETING BY: Via Zoom: Join Zoom meeting https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/83163896713 (Enter your email and name) Join by One Tap Mobile : US: +16699006833,,83163896713# or +13462487799,,83163896713# Join by Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 831 6389 6713 Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022 April 1, 2022City Council Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee Special Meeting Agenda American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at [email protected]. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 24-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at [email protected], 24-hours before the meeting. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City of South San Francisco to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. Call To Order. Roll Call. Agenda Review. Remote Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda. Speakers are allowed to speak on items on the agenda for up to three minutes. If there appears to be a large number of speakers, speaking time may be reduced subject to the Chair's discretion to limit the total amount of time for public comments (Gov. Code sec. 54954.3.(b)(1).). Comments that are not in compliance with the City Council's rules of decorum may be summarized for the record if they are in writing or muted if they are made live. HOW TO SUBMIT WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE THE MEETING Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting via the eComment tab by 11:00 a.m. on the meeting date. Use the eComment portal by clicking on the following link: https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings or by visiting the City Council meeting's agenda page. eComments are also directly sent to the iLegislate application used by Committee Members and staff. Comments received by the deadline will be included as part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud during the meeting. Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022 April 1, 2022City Council Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee Special Meeting Agenda HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE MEETING Members of the public who wish to provide comment during the meeting may do so by using the “Raise Hand” feature: • To raise your hand on a PC or Mac desktop/laptop, click the button labeled "Raise Hand” at the bottom of the window on the right side of the screen. Lower your hand by clicking the same button, now labeled “Lower Hand.” • To raise your hand on a mobile device, tap “Raise Hand” at the bottom left corner of the screen. The hand icon will turn blue, and the text below it will switch to say "Lower Hand" while your hand is raised. To lower your hand, click on “Lower Hand.” • To raise your hand when participating by telephone, press *9. • To toggle mute/unmute, press *6. Once your hand is raised, please wait to be acknowledged by the City Clerk, or designee, who will call on speakers. When called upon, speakers will be unmuted. After the allotted time, speakers will be placed on mute. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of April 20, 2021.1. Presentation on the 2022 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report (Mike Futrell, City Manager, City of South San Francisco and James Pruett, General Manager, San Mateo County Harbor District) 2. Report regarding the status of the Phase 1-C park and landscape improvements at Oyster Point Marina Park. (Greg Mediati, Director of Parks and Recreation) 3. Update on the SPIT at Oyster Point Marina (Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer, Public Works Department) 4. Update on the Kilroy Oyster Point Development project (Jonas Vass, Kilroy Realty)5. Update on the Ensemble Hotel Development at Oyster Point Marina (Ernesto Lucero, Economic and Community Development) 6. Adjournment. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-226 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:1. Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of April 20, 2021. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Call to Order: 1:00 p.m. Roll Call: Present: South San Francisco: Councilmembers Coleman and Flores. San Mateo County Harbor District: Commissioners Zemke and Mattusch. Absent: None. Remote Public Comments: Scott Grindy John Ullom MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of September 28, 2020.. Motion – Commissioner Zemke / Second – Councilmember Flores: to approve the minutes. The motion carried unanimously. MINUTES OYSTER POINT LIAISON COMMITTEE of THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT and THE OYSTER POINT MARINA LIAISON STANDING COMMITTEE of THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO serving as THE OYSTER POINT MARINA JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AGREEMENT LIAISON GROUP P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2021 1:00 P.M. Teleconference via Zoom Community Development Block Grant Standing Committee conducted this meeting in accordance with California Governor Newsom’s Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-63-20 and COVID-19 pandemic protocols. JOINT CITY OF SSF HARBOR DISTRICT STANDING COMMITTEE APRIL 20, 2021 MINUTES PAGE 4 2. 2021 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report. (James Pruett, General Manager, San Mateo County Harbor District and Mike Futrell, City Manager) General Manager Pruett and City Manager Futrell gave a brief presentation of the 2021 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report. Councilmember Flores acknowledged and thanked staff for the report. PUBLIC COMMENT John Ullom Motion – Councilmember Flores / Second – Commissioner Zemke: to approve the 2021 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report. The motion carried unanimously. 3. Update on the Sewage vacuum house/electrical distribution panel. (Eunejune Kim, Director of Public Works) Director Kim provided an update on the sewage vacuum house/electrical distribution pale. Commissioner Zemke inquired whether staff could provide a date on when a possible new pump station would be built. City Manager Futrell stated no earlier than three years and added that the City was currently in negotiations with the hotel developer. 4. Status on Dock(s) 12, 13, 14 improvements. (James Pruett, General Manager, San Mateo County Harbor District) General Manager Pruett provided a status on the replacement of docks 12,13, and 14 as required by the 2018 agreement. He advised that the San Mateo County Harbor District was responsible to replace those docks by December 31, 2024. Councilmember Flores inquired whether the dock 14 entrance inundation issue would also be addressed. General Manager Pruett stated they plan to address the flooding issues caused by the tides and heavy weather. He advised they were still researching and working with the City on how to address the addition of the bank. PUBLIC COMMENT John Ullom 5. Presentation on the Oyster Point Development Project. (Jonas Vass, Kilroy Realty) Jonas Vass, Kilroy Realty provided a presentation on the Oyster Point Development Project. PUBLIC COMMENT John Ullom JOINT CITY OF SSF HARBOR DISTRICT STANDING COMMITTEE APRIL 20, 2021 MINUTES PAGE 4 Commissioners Mattusch and Zemke were excited to see the project come to fruition and were impressed with the amount of hard work. Councilmembers Flores and Coleman were optimistic and excited to see the end product and were looking forward to making Oyster Point a destination that people will love to spend time and enjoy the public areas. 6. Update on Kilroy Oyster Point Community Facilities District. (Sky Woodruff, City Attorney and Christina Fernandez, Assistant to the City Manager) Assistant to the City Manager Fernandez provided an update on the Kilroy Oyster Point Community Facilities District. PUBLIC COMMENT John Ullom Commissioner Mattusch suggested the addition of fuel dock at Oyster Point to service the people that occupy that harbor. Commissioner Zemke stated that the fuel dock had to make economic sense to everyone. Councilmember Flores suggested that future Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee meetings perhaps be adjusted to start later in the day or evening if the rest of the committee members were okay with the idea. Commissioner Zemke and Councilmember Coleman had no objection to the time change. Commissioner Mattusch preferred afternoon meetings but would try his best to attend evening meetings if need be. Adjournment. Being no further business, Councilmember Coleman adjourned the meeting at 1:54 p.m. Submitted: Approved: Gabriel Rodriguez, Deputy City Clerk James Coleman, Councilmember City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco Bill Zemke, Commissioner San Mateo County Harbor District Approved by the Harbor District Standing Committee: / / City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-227 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:2. Presentation on the 2022 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report (Mike Futrell,City Manager,City of South San Francisco and James Pruett, General Manager, San Mateo County Harbor District) City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ San Mateo County Harbor District Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position Oyster Point Marina For the year ended June 30, 2021 (with comparative totals for the year ended June 30, 2020) 2021 2020 OPERATING REVENUES: Berth rental, transient fees and dockage 1,229,303$ 1,251,039$ Launching fees 30,065 24,432 Rents and concessions 117,670 124,163 Events and permits - 1,126 Other operating revenues 27,203 26,617 Total operating revenues 1,404,241 1,427,377 OPERATING EXPENSES: Advertising and promotion 5,650 2,435 Bad debts 60,195 34,075 Bank charges 30,241 26,363 Contractual services 91,852 86,779 Dues and subscriptions - 338 Insurance 57,204 43,244 IT 53,583 44,479 Legal fees - 6,814 Personnel expenses 3,356 2,912 Miscellaneous expenses 427 1,237 Repairs and maintenance 73,631 119,230 Operating expenses 98,486 86,992 Salaries and benefits 1,762,585 1,625,371 Travel, training, seminars and professional development 8,169 1,633 Utilities 165,826 145,178 Vessel destruction 9,975 40,240 Depreciation and amortization 628,467 630,956 Total operating expenses 3,049,647 2,898,276 Operating income (loss) (1,645,406) (1,470,899) NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): Grants 8,037 52,304 Termination benefits (44,008) (17,514) Miscellaneous revenue 1,008 1,141 Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (34,963) 35,931 Net Income (1,680,369)$ (1,434,968)$ 46 Page 1 of 3 14,552.76 0.00 14,552.7614,552.761202510 18,518.85 2,982.84 21,501.6929,829.001202510 14,880.18 5,029.92 19,910.1050,299.131202510 47,951.79 8,012.76 55,964.5594,680.89 177,641.13 0.00 177,641.13177,641.131203010 42,598.25 0.00 42,598.2542,598.251203010 220,239.38 0.00 220,239.38220,239.38 7,738,268.34 191,265.24 7,929,533.589,563,258.006004050 7,738,268.34 191,265.24 7,929,533.589,563,258.00 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.392404520 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.392404520 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.392404520 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.392404520 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.402404520 4,356.75 2,826.00 7,182.7556,520.402404520 26,140.50 16,956.00 43,096.50339,122.36 1,238,379.64 108,076.68 1,346,456.322,161,535.002405520 87,996.00 0.00 87,996.0087,996.002405520 1,326,375.64 108,076.68 1,434,452.322,249,531.00 175,043.79 12,106.68 187,150.47302,669.003006025 175,043.79 12,106.68 187,150.47302,669.00 281,522.14 7,721.64 289,243.78308,870.004807040 211,942.86 5,813.40 217,756.26232,532.004807040 301 - OYSTER POINT MARINA 147.000 - Oyster Point Assets 250 - AUTOS AND TRUCKS 305 - BOATS AND RADAR 405 - BREAKWATER 450 - UTILITIES 550 - LAUNCH RAMPS 605 - PIERS 705 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS Activity Department Printed Date: 03/21/2022 Report End Date: 06/30/2021 Report Start Date: 07/01/2020SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT DETAIL Depreciation - BY Activity AND ACCOUNT Capitalized Flag: YES Account Asset Number Description Accum Depr on 07/01/2020 Accum Depr on 06/30/2021 Depreciation Expense for Period Total Cost on 06/30/2021 Useful Life (Months) FORD RANGER PICK-UPA00000178 FORD F250 4X2 PICKUPA00000200 FORD F250 SUPER CABA00000235 Total for Account 250 : WHALER BOATA00000190 MARINE BOATA00000191 Total for Account 305 : BREAK WATER FIXEDA00000006 Total for Account 405 : TRANSFORMER DOCK 1AMX0014 TRANSFORMER DOCK 2AMX0015 TRANSFORMER DOCK 3AMX0016 TRANSFORMER DOCK 4AMX0017 TRANSFORMER DOCK 5AMX0018 TRANSFORMER DOCK 6AMX0019 Total for Account 450 : LAUNCH RAMPA00000032 WINDSURFING LAUNCH RAMPA00000034 Total for Account 550 : FISHING PIERA00000038 Total for Account 605 : HARBORMASTER OFFICEA00000059 MAINTENANE BUILDINGA00000060 01/01/2003 04/23/2014 07/15/2017 01/01/2007 01/01/1997 01/01/1980 12/05/2018 12/05/2018 12/05/2018 12/05/2018 12/05/2018 12/05/2018 01/01/2009 01/01/1998 01/01/2006 01/01/1984 01/01/1984 Asset ClassAcq Date Page 2 of 3 99,808.06 2,664.84 102,472.90106,581.004807040 51,897.12 7,641.36 59,538.48152,825.902407020 199,617.73 5,328.84 204,946.57213,162.004807040 51,897.12 7,641.36 59,538.48152,825.912407020 99,808.06 2,664.84 102,472.90106,581.004807040 51,897.12 7,641.36 59,538.48152,825.912407020 199,617.73 5,328.84 204,946.57213,162.004807040 214,255.46 2,941.54 217,197.00217,197.004807040 27,357.31 898.08 28,255.3935,926.584807040 1,489,620.71 56,286.10 1,545,906.811,892,489.30 396,000.00 0.00 396,000.00396,000.003607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 359,568.00 0.00 359,568.00359,568.003607530 453,024.00 0.00 453,024.00453,024.003607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 408,672.00 0.00 408,672.00408,672.003607530 470,448.00 0.00 470,448.00470,448.003607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 415,800.00 0.00 415,800.00415,800.003607530 364,320.00 0.00 364,320.00364,320.003607530 154,665.38 22,227.36 176,892.74666,821.753607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 343,728.00 0.00 343,728.00343,728.003607530 154,665.38 22,227.36 176,892.74666,821.753607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 418,176.00 0.00 418,176.00418,176.003607530 154,665.38 22,227.36 176,892.74666,821.753607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 325,019.06 49,059.48 374,078.541,471,785.353607530 154,665.38 22,227.36 176,892.74666,821.753607530 750 - DOCKS Activity Department Printed Date: 03/21/2022 Report End Date: 06/30/2021 Report Start Date: 07/01/2020SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT DETAIL Depreciation - BY Activity AND ACCOUNT Capitalized Flag: YES Account Asset Number Description Accum Depr on 07/01/2020 Accum Depr on 06/30/2021 Depreciation Expense for Period Total Cost on 06/30/2021 Useful Life (Months) RESTROOM - FISHING PIERA00000061 FISHING PIER RESTROOM A00000061A RESTROOM - DOCKS 12/13A00000062 DOCKS 12/13 RESTROOM A00000062A RESTROOM - DOCK 11A00000064 DOCK 11 RESTROOM A00000064A RESTROOM - DOCKS 5/6A00000065 RESTROOM - DOCKS 1/2A00000067 PUMP STATIONA00000069 Total for Account 705 : DOCK 1A00000083 DOCKS 1 & 2 GATEA00000083A DOCK 2A00000084 DOCK 3A00000085 DOCKS 3 & 4 GATEA00000085A DOCK 4A00000086 DOCK 5A00000087 DOCKS 5 & 6 GATEA00000087A DOCK 6A00000088 DOCK 12A00000090 DOCK 12 WAVE ATTENUATORSA00000090A DOCK 12 GATEA00000090B DOCK 13A00000091 DOCK 13 WAVE ATTENUATORSA00000091A DOCK 13 GATEA00000091B DOCK 14A00000092 DOCK 14 WAVE ATTENUATORSA00000092A DOCK 14 GATEA00000092B DOCK 11A00000201 DOCK 11 WAVE ATTENUATORSA00000201A 01/01/1983 09/30/2013 01/01/1983 09/30/2013 01/01/1983 09/30/2013 01/01/1983 01/01/1981 01/01/1990 01/01/1977 01/01/2007 01/01/1977 01/01/1977 01/01/2007 01/01/1977 01/01/1977 01/01/2007 01/01/1977 01/01/1977 07/01/2013 01/01/2007 01/01/1977 07/01/2013 01/01/2007 01/01/1977 07/01/2013 01/01/2007 11/27/2013 07/01/2013 Asset ClassAcq Date Page 3 of 3 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 113,766.67 16,750.92 130,517.59502,529.023607530 71,817.07 5,336.16 77,153.23106,724.722407520 5,261,719.81 197,409.12 5,459,128.939,125,135.13 264,615.00 21,240.00 285,855.00531,000.003008025 152,720.40 0.00 152,720.40152,720.403008025 417,335.40 21,240.00 438,575.40683,720.40 131,788.92 5,868.36 137,657.28146,704.053008525 155,172.35 6,909.24 162,081.59172,733.433008525 286,961.27 12,777.60 299,738.87319,437.48 35,441.37 0.00 35,441.3735,441.372409020 13,705.76 0.00 13,705.7613,705.76609005 7,448.15 1,250.04 8,698.1912,500.001209010 14,789.57 3,086.52 17,876.0930,865.001209010 71,384.85 4,336.56 75,721.4192,512.13 17,061,041.48 628,466.74 17,689,508.2224,882,795.07 17,061,041.48 628,466.74 17,689,508.2224,882,795.07 17,061,041.48 628,466.74 17,689,508.2224,882,795.07 17,061,041.48 628,466.74 17,689,508.2224,882,795.07 805 - PARKING LOTS 850 - WALKWAYS AND PATHS 900 - MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT Activity Department Printed Date: 03/21/2022 Report End Date: 06/30/2021 Report Start Date: 07/01/2020SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT DETAIL Depreciation - BY Activity AND ACCOUNT Capitalized Flag: YES Account Asset Number Description Accum Depr on 07/01/2020 Accum Depr on 06/30/2021 Depreciation Expense for Period Total Cost on 06/30/2021 Useful Life (Months) DOCK 11 GATEA00000201B DOCK 8 - GUEST DOCKA00000202 FUEL DOCK GATEA00000224 Total for Account 750 : BOAT TRAILER PARKING LOTA00000103 WEST BASIN TENANT PARKING AMX0005 Total for Account 805 : WALKWAY - SOUTH BAY TRAIL A00000122 WALKWAY - SOUTH BAY TRAIL A00000125 Total for Account 850 : VACUUM PUMPA00000017 PRINTER / COPIERA00000198 ELECTRICAL POWER PAD FOR A00000209 TRASH COMPACTOR 20 YARDA00000211 Total for Account 900 : Total for Department 147.000 : Total for Activity 301 : Total for Organization SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT : Grand Total: 01/01/2007 09/30/2013 01/01/2007 01/01/2008 01/01/1990 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 01/01/1999 10/25/2013 07/01/2014 09/16/2015 Asset ClassAcq Date Picksticking City of SSF - Parks Leafblowing City of SSF - Parks Check/empty trash City of SSF - Parks Beach grooming City of SSF - Parks Landscape pruning City of SSF - Parks Mowing City of SSF - Parks Irrigation repairs City of SSF - Parks Pressure wash hardscape City of SSF - Parks Weed abatement City of SSF - Parks Graffiti abatement City of SSF - Parks Tree pruning City of SSF - Parks Planting City of SSF - Parks Mulching City of SSF - Parks Replanting plant material City of SSF - Parks Dog waste receptacle maintenance and trash clean up City of SSF - Parks Marsh / Pickleweed maintenance and restoration City of SSF - Parks Replenishing sand City of SSF - Parks Event management /coordination City of SSF - Parks Public Art installation and maintenance City of SSF - Parks Maintaining, permitting picnic sites City of SSF - Parks Class / activity implementation City of SSF - Parks Street sweeping City of SSF - DPW Vacuum lines City of SSF - DPW Sewer jetting City of SSF - DPW Sewer and Pump Station Maintenance City of SSF - DPW Concrete repairs City of SSF - DPW Pothole repairs, parking lot repairs and striping City of SSF - DPW Traffic Signal Maintenance City of SSF - DPW Sign maintenance City of SSF - DPW Striping / curb painting City of SSF - DPW Asphalt maintenance City of SSF - DPW Beach restroom cleaning / maintenance SMC Harbor District Marina (2) Restroom cleaning / routine maintenance SMC Harbor District Restocking of restroom materials SMC Harbor District Restroom lighting and plumbing repairs SMC Harbor District Restroom opening/closing SMC Harbor District Capital improvements to restroom buildings HD and City to meet and confer on Capital Projects Door hardware / access control maintenance City of SSF - Parks Partitions repairs SMC Harbor District Painting SMC Harbor District Roofing SMC Harbor District Parking Enforcement City of SSF - Police Department Restroom Fire Alarm Systems SMC Harbor District Phase 1C Security Cameras y p , p installation of future cameras on landside area. Harbor District may install own cameras, which they Facility Keys City of SSF - Parks Backflow Preventor Inspections City of SSF - Parks Methane Control Inspections and Maintenance City of SSF - DPW Bay Trail Signage City of SSF - Parks City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-228 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding the status of the Phase 1-C park and landscape improvements at Oyster Point Marina Park. (Greg Mediati, Director of Parks and Recreation) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee be apprised of the improved parks and open space amenities at Oyster Point Marina Park. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Kilroy Oyster Point project has been under construction since late 2017 and is a joint project between the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and developer,Kilroy.This development was entitled in 2011 to then project developer,SKS Shorenstein for 2.25 million square feet of new office/research buildings,a future hotel site,a new park,an improved Bay Trail,a beach area and related infrastructure to support the project.Oyster Point Marina Park is a 57-acre open space area,of which approximately 20 acres have been significantly improved as public parkland since 2017. The subcommittee may recall that the currently on-going work on the peninsula has been split into two phases: Phase 1-D (1-Developer)facilities are being constructed on property conveyed to the developer,Kilroy.This phase of work includes: •Repair of the clay landfill cap. •Remediation/clean-up of a sump area. •Installation of methane control and monitoring systems. •Relocation of some refuse. •Development of research and development/office buildings,which now houses Stripe,a Financial Technology company. Phase 1-C (1-City)involves the area west of the ferry terminal to Oyster Point Boulevard.Public improvements include: •Improving streets and utilities. •Repair/upgrade of the clay landfill cap on City-owned property. •Reconfiguration and repair of existing parking areas. •Grading and construction of an open space area. •Grading of a potential future hotel site. •Landscaping of a beach area and park. •Elevation of the waterfront to anticipate future sea level rise, and reconstruction of the Bay Trail. Additionally,Phase 2-C (2-City)is a future project that addresses the area east of the ferry terminal and future hotel site. Public improvements identified for this area include: ·A new sewer pump station at the marina. ·Repaving of existing parking. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:22-228 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:3. ·Landscape tune-up at existing parking. ·Bay Trail landscaping and improvements. Preliminary design of these 2-C efforts is underway with a total design and construction budget of $8.7 million. Staff is coordinating design efforts with Harbor District staff and plans to present conceptual design of the parking area, landscape and Bay Trail to the Harbor District in the coming months. Park and Open Space Amenities In 2017,the project team selected James Corner Field Operations to serve as the project’s landscape architect. Design and public engagement progressed,culminating with a construction drawing package that included the following park amenities: •A replenished beach with picnic tables,viewing areas,improved ADA access,and a beach restroom facility. •A realigned Marina Boulevard, with improved street landscaping, trees, and a palm allee. •Parking for park visitors and marina tenants. •Native and drought-tolerant planting beds and green infrastructure,with approximately 200 new park trees. •Park furnishings including benches,picnic tables,trash and recycling receptacles,enhanced lighting, signage and pet waste stations. •Lawn and hardscape gathering and event areas,including a decomposed granite plaza designed to accommodate food trucks and other event equipment. •One marina comfort station for marina tenants only, which includes restrooms and showers. •One comfort station for both the public and marina tenants,which includes public and tenant restrooms, a tenant-only shower facility, storage and a vending window for City-operated programs and events. •An improved Bay Trail, raised to mitigate the impacts of sea level rise. •A three-acre open space area,which will be irrigated and hydroseeded for lawn,with a small temporary parking lot.The future use of this open space area can be further studied to provide additional park uses,including small playing fields,or other active park uses.Additional planning and public outreach will determine the future use of this site. These improvements are nearing completion.Substantial completion of this portion of the project is expected in June 2022,at which time the landscape maintenance obligation for the improved areas will be accepted by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department.The remainder of the marina’s landscaping east of the ferry building will continue to be maintained by the Harbor District, as will any waterside infrastructure. Maintenance Considerations Understanding the critical need to maintain the new park at Oyster Point at a high level,three new Park Maintenance Worker positions have been authorized by the City Council:one Lead Park Maintenance Worker, one Senior Park Maintenance Worker,and one entry-level Park Maintenance Worker.These positions are currently funded by the general fund;however,once revenue is realized,they will be funded by the Oyster Point Community Facilities District. The Lead Park Maintenance Worker will be responsible for skilled maintenance and repair work at Oyster Point Marina Park and nearby right-of-way areas,including commissioning,maintenance and repairs of irrigation systems,park furnishings,trails,and plant material.The Lead Maintenance Worker will provide field supervision for a Senior Park Maintenance Worker,who will be tasked with progressively more skilled maintenance activities,and one entry-level Park Maintenance Worker who will perform more basic City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:22-228 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:3. maintenance functions. This maintenance team will be managed by the Parks and Recreation Department and deployed from the Maintenance Services Building (Corporation Yard)under the direction of the Parks Manager and Parks Supervisor. Maintenance of public works infrastructure and restroom facilities is currently being negotiated.Findings may be reported verbally or as part of the 2022 Oyster Point Marina Annual Report. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee be apprised the improved parks and open space amenities at Oyster Point Marina Park.Staff will be prepared to respond to questions and receive feedback from the Subcommittee. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AMENITIES AT OYSTER POINT MARINA PARK HARBOR DISTRICT LIAISON SUBCOMMITTEE APRIL 1, 2022 2 •Joint project between the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Kilroy. •Entitled in 2011 for 2.25 million square feet of new office/research buildings future hotel, new park, improved Bay Trail, beach and related infrastructure. •20 acres have been improved as public parkland since 2017. PROJECT BACKGROUND 3 Phase I-D (I-Developer) facilities are being constructed on property conveyed to the developer, Kilroy: •Repair of the clay cap. •Installation of methane control and monitoring system. •Relocation of some refuse. •Development of research and development/office buildings, which now houses Stripe. PROJECT BACKGROUND 4 Phase I-C involves the area west of the ferry terminal to Oyster Point Boulevard: •Improving streets and utilities. •Repair/upgrade of the clay landfill cap. •Reconfiguration and repair of parking lots. •Construction of an open space area. •Future hotel site. •Landscaping of a beach area and park. •Elevation of the bay trail to mitigate SLR. PROJECT BACKGROUND SITE PLAN 5 6 •Scheduled completion: June 2022. •Landscape maintenance for improved areas accepted by Parks and Recreation Department. •Remainder of the marina’s landscaping east of the ferry building and waterside infrastructure maintained by Harbor District. •3 Park Maintenance Worker positions to be funded by CFD. MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS 7 CONSTRUCTION IMAGES 8 CONSTRUCTION IMAGES 9 CONSTRUCTION IMAGES City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-229 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:4. Update on the SPIT at Oyster Point Marina (Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer, Public Works Department) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee receive an update on efforts to address sea level rise at the Spit at Oyster Point. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Due to the formatting limitations of the City’s agenda management platform,the full staff report accompanying this agenda item is being attached as Attachment 1 of this report. Attachments: 1)Staff Report 2)Site and Architecture Package 3)Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. Update on the SPIT at Oyster Point Marina (Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer, Public Works Department) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee receive an update on efforts to address sea level rise at the Spit at Oyster Point. Introduction City Staff are engaged in a three-pronged feasibility study examining (1) how best to address Sea Level Rise at the Spit at Oyster Point; (2) possible construction of a ferry terminal building at the Spit; and (3) possible expansion of commuter ferry service to Oyster Point, utilizing the Spit area. This entailed examining engineering approaches to address flooding and seawater inundation of the capped landfill at the Spit, while exploring options to build off the shoring improvement to expand water transportation services and create indoor and outdoor programmable spaces to serve residents, commuters, boaters, users of the Bay Trail and the general public. The following sections describe the recommended engineering approach to fortify the Spit, potential ferry building designs, North-South transportation routes, ridership potential, and space programming opportunities. Project Description Located East of 101 in the area known as Oyster Point, the Spit is owned by the City of South San Francisco and includes Harbor Master Road, the Harbor Master’s Office and provides access to the Guest Dock and Dock Seven. The Spit itself is adjacent to the Kilroy Oyster Point Development which is currently under construction. City of South San Francisco Page 2 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. Figure A: Location Map Site Background The Oyster Point Landfill is a closed, unlined Class III landfill regulated by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, (RWQCB) San Francisco Bay Region under Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations. The landfill operated between 1956 and 1970 and was primarily used for the disposal of solid wastes. Prior to 1956, the existing Oyster Point Landfill area consisted of tidal marshlands and upland bedrock and soils. Waste disposal operations resulted in the extension of the shoreline approximately 3,000 feet to the east of the pre-landfill shoreline. Consistent with landfill practices at that time, no liner was installed at the site. Instead, the waste materials were placed directly onto the Younger Bay Mud and soils overlying bedrock. Between 1956 and 1970, the City leased the site to the now defunct landfill operator The South San Francisco Scavenger Company, (Scavenger). Between 1970 and 1977, the City conducted maintenance activities at the closed landfill. The City operated a marina constructed in 1962 adjacent to a portion of the former landfill. Since 1977, the San Mateo County Harbor District has operated the municipal marina and a park at the landfill and manages property leases for other facilities under a joint powers agreement with the City. The marina was expanded in 1978. After landfill operations ceased in 1970, the City and Scavenger conducted various site closure activities. Between 1971 and 1976, the upper surface of the landfill was compacted, and a 2-foot layer of low- permeability soil was placed on top of the compacted fill. Additional remedial measures were constructed between 1979 and 1981. They included installation of a 2- to 3-foot thick Bay Mud cap across the site, City of South San Francisco Page 3 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. placement of additional riprap and Bay Mud along the Marina, construction of bentonite-cement trenches between the landfill and the drainage channel and along an approximately 300-foot length of shoreline on the west basin (beach area), and realignment of the drainage channel. In addition, Bay Mud was placed along the southern boundary of the landfill where leachate seepage had been observed. In 1987, a Bay Mud leachate cutoff trench was constructed along the northern landfill boundary, between the mole and beach area. A gas barrier trench consisting of compacted soil (85%) and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) liner (20 mils thick) was also installed along the western landfill boundary. On June 21, 2000, the RWQCB issued the City Order No 2000-046 which updated its Waste Discharge Requirements for the landfill to incorporate general provisions for anticipated site development and to bring the landfill into compliance with appropriate portions of Title 27. The images shown in Figures B, C, D, and E show the evolution of the Oyster Point Landfill. The image in Figure B shows the initial placement of landfill in 1958 prior to the filling of the Spit. Figure C shows the landfill in 1963 and includes the Spit and the new City operated marina facility. The image in Figure D is from 1972 and shows the full Oyster Point Landfill after landfilling operations ceased but prior to the closure activities being completed. Figure E shows the landfill in 1979 at the completion of major landfill remedial improvements and harbor improvements. It should be noted that the remedial work performed at the Spit in 1979 resulted in a larger footprint of the landfill as compared to the image in 1972. City of South San Francisco Page 4 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. Since the remedial landfill improvements were completed in 1979, the refuse and underlying Bay Mud settled in various locations on the Oyster Point landfill. In 2005, the City received a letter from the RWQCB requiring the City to correct a violation of Order No. R2-2000-046 since water was observed ponding on the landfill. Ponding and flooding on a landfill site can impact groundwater and surface water quality and can potentially cause erosion of the landfill cap which as a result could expose refuse material, create leaching of waste pollutants, and exacerbate settlement of the site. Most of the violations are being corrected as part of the Kilroy Oyster Point Development improvements. However, the Spit remains in violation of the Order and must still be corrected. Given all the landfill settlement that has occurred on the Spit, it is now a common occurrence for the entire area to be inundated with tidal waters at extreme high tides. This situation will get worse as Sea Level Rise becomes a reality. The image shown in Figure F was taken during a high tide and shows the Harbor Master Building not accessible. This condition is not only inconvenient to Marina patrons, but it also poses an environmental hazard to SF Bay given the potential of Bay waters mixing with the closed landfill refuse and leachate water. Engineering Study Three options are being considered for resolving the flooding at the Spit as follows: Option 1: Elevate the Spit to accommodate the predicted Sea Level Rise in the year 2100. Option 2: Elevate the Spit to accommodate the predicted Sea Level Rise in the year 2050 but provide for adapting to future rise in sea level. Option 3: Remove all the landfill within Spit and return the area to Bay waters. City of South San Francisco Page 5 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. Both Option 1 and Option 2 would include the installation of a steel sheetpile retaining wall along the perimeter of the landfill refuse and the import of engineered fill material to raise the grades of the site. Both these options would be designed to accommodate future commercial development on the Spit. Figure G shows a plan view of the Spit and the proposed location of the containment wall. Figures H and I show the cross section of the proposed improvements relative to the tide elevations. City of South San Francisco Page 6 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. Option 3 would include the installation of a temporary cofferdam surrounding the perimeter of the Spit to keep the Bay waters from entering the project area. It would also include the excavation and disposal of all soil and refuse material encapsulated within the landfill. The refuse material would most likely be disposed of at a Class I RCRA Hazardous Waste landfill. In addition, any landfill leachate water encountered during the excavation would be disposed of as hazardous material. There would also be a significant amount of environmental soil testing needed of the waste material and confirmation samples of the underlying bay mud to verify that all hazardous material is removed before the site is returned to Bay waters. Pros and Cons of the Various Options: Description and Estimated Cost Pros Cons Option 1 Elevate Spit to accommodate the predicted SLR in 2100. Est. Cost: $17-34M ● Resolves the long-term flooding and RWQCB violation as one project. ● Accommodates future development. ● More expensive than Option 2 ● Predictions for SLR in 2100 could change over the next 50 years and require further mitigations. Option 2 Elevate Spit to accommodate the predicted SLR in 2050 but provide for adapting to future SLR. Est. Cost: $15-30M ● Resolves the immediate flooding and RWQCB violation. ● Less expensive than Option 1 in the short term. ● Allows more flexibility for adapting design to more accurate SLR predictions. ● Accommodates future development. ● Requires a future project to accommodate SLR projected for 2100. Option 3 Remove landfill contained within the Spit and return the area to Bay waters. Est. Cost: $45 ● Resolves the RWQCB violation. ● An environmental improvement to SF Bay. ● The highest cost solution. ● No future development opportunity on the Spit Next Steps: All options being considered must be vetted for Regulatory Permits by the US Army Corps of Engineers, BCDC, the RWQCB, and the Department of Fish and Game and will require various biological and other studies as part of the Environmental clearance required under CEQA and NEPA. Moving forward with the project requires a substantial amount of preliminary engineering to further develop the project alternatives. Direction from the City Council will be needed for the desired Option to pursue with the Regulators but the ultimate decision will be at the discretion of the Regulators and what they will permit to be constructed. City of South San Francisco Page 7 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. At a special City Council meeting on May 25, 2021, staff presented an update on the HMS Project. The presentation included a discussion on how best to address Sea Level Rise at the Spit at Oyster Point; possible construction of a ferry terminal building at the Spit; and possible expansion of commuter ferry service to Oyster Point. Staff presented the City Council with three options to address the long-term sea-level rise adaptation of the Spit with an estimated cost range of $15 million to $34 million. As the project moved forward, staff identified a potential maintenance project; restoration of the spit to the original grades established by the 1979 landfill closure project. Restoring the grades to the levels established in 1979 will raise the area higher than the current King Tides and the 100-year design storm water surface elevations. In addition to raising the grades of the site, the project replaces the existing roadway with new hardscape and landscape features to accommodate the existing Harbor Master Building and public access requirements to be imposed by BCDC. The project provides ADA improvements to the guest dock and constructs a small shelter to protect ferry patrons from the elements. The project footprint is consistent with the long-term development goals for the site. The cost to implement the maintenance project is estimated to be between $4 million to $8 million, depending on the type of surface improvements constructed and any environmental mitigations required by regulatory agencies. Completion of the maintenance project ensures compliance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order, and maintains and improves access to the area until the long-term project is complete. Amending the existing Consulting Services Agreement with Wilsey Ham is necessary to update the scope of services to include the following: • Preparation of Regulatory Permit Applications including preliminary engineering with 35% plans for Geotechnical, Civil Engineering, and Landscape Architecture and complete project narratives. • Environmental Clearance for CEQA and NEPA documentation (May require public outreach, Planning Commission and City Council approval) • Prepare Final Plans and Specifications/bid documents for the Phase 1 project Site Design and Planning With an expanded footprint, the fortified Spit presents the opportunity to serve South San Francisco residents, commuters and visitors through indoor and outdoor spaces for recreation, retail, and entertainment. Working with SB Architects, staff identified programs that complement current Oyster Point activities and users as well as the increased daytime and weekend population the Kilroy Oyster Point Development is slated to bring to the area. File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 8 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ Figure J: Conditions Map Site Programs & Amenities Outdoor spaces are proposed to include a perimeter walking path offering breathtaking views along with access to docks for non-motorized boating such as kayaks, canoes and dragon boats. Flexible plaza spaces would offer opportunities for events, performances, and markets. First and last mile amenities such as bike and scooter rental could serve commuters as well as offer recreational activities for residents. Utilizing the existing Guest Dock, the addition of an accessible ramp, ticketing kiosk and shelter for protection from the elements would allow for weekday commuter services to San Francisco Mission Bay and The Ferry Building as well as weekend service to destinations such as The Chase Center and Pier 39. Building Programs & Amenities In addition to kiosks that could provide grab & go items such as coffee, pastries and sandwiches, the building structure itself is proposed to include multipurpose rooms for Parks & Recreation to classes and activities as well as rented for events such as weddings, celebrations and conferences with pre-function, catering and storage. Public restrooms would serve users of both indoor and outdoor spaces. A minimal amount of office space could accommodate the Harbor Master and/or Recreation staff. File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 9 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ The building and site design is intended to harmonize with the new structures coming in as part of the beach and waterfront improvements as well as the new Kilroy Developments with a mixture of materials suitable for the marine environment. The building orientation along the west side of the Spit would offer protection from western breezes for the bulk of the outdoor gathering and programmable spaces on the east side of the spit. Use of glass would offer views out to the Bay while creating a transparent and inviting space for visitors. Engagement The building and landscape spaces as conceived were reviewed with James Pruett, General Manager of the San Mateo Harbor District. He generally supported the project for it’s opportunity to better utilize the Guest Dock and improved access and amenities for boaters. Additional engagement with stakeholders including the Dragon Boat, live-aboards, commuters and recreation users of the area would further inform the program opportunities and design. Precedent imagery along with site and building designs are included as Attachment: Site and Architecture Package. Increasing Traffic Demand The East of 101 Area is among the Bay Area’s fastest growing employment districts. Home to approximately 28,000 employees, the Area represents an international hub for life science and biotechnology as well as a regional center for industry, logistics, and travel. Over the next two decades, the Area is expected to add over 13 million square feet of mostly office and research & development (R&D) space, roughly doubling its daytime population to over 55,000 employees. Approximately half of this growth is already approved or under construction, while the remainder is expected to be approved and developed in the future. A significant investment in transportation infrastructure and services is needed to accommodate and realize expected growth. The Area’s few points of vehicle access constrain travel to a few congested traffic bottlenecks, while transit and active transportation options are limited. The temporary closure of the South Airport Boulevard Bridge in 2018 illustrates the lack of resilience in the transportation system. Moreover, regional forces beyond the City’s control - housing affordability, jobs-housing imbalance, and an overburdened freeway system - may increasingly constrict the Area’s accessibility and competitiveness. As outlined in the City’s E101 Master Traffic Plan, Mobility 2020, the City established transportation commitments in five policy areas including: 1. Expanding Throughput Capacity 2. Maintaining Efficient Street Operations 3. Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 4. Reducing Drive Alone Mode Share 5. Improve Safety to all street users These policy objectives are difficult to attain as transportation infrastructure has not kept up with the changing File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 10 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ needs and the evolution of the employment base east of Highway 101. Alternative transit modes are needed in order to expand throughput, reduce VMT, and reduce single occupancy vehicles. Ferry service is explored in this report as a possible alternate mode of travel. Potential Routes & Farebox New transit alternatives are necessary in order for the area to remain competitive globally. While existing ferry service is provided by WETA, currently only East-West routes are available. The City hired consultant, Tideline Marine (Tideline), to analyze and study potential routes and ridership between South San Francisco’s Oyster Point Marina and popular commuter hubs in San Francisco. Tideline provided an analysis of potential North-South routes beginning with an analysis of ridership and farebox recovery. Tideline defined the trip origin and destination regions to capture users who lived and worked in close proximity to the ferry landing locations on both ends. The yellow shaded region (figure 1) represents the region in San Francisco used for the data analysis. The blue region represents the South San Francisco region used. Third party data sources modeled average daily trips taken from San Francisco to South San Francisco and from South San Francisco to San Francisco in 2019. Data showed us the average number of trips taken per day across different time periods adjusted for seasonality. Ridership analysis projected increases based on 3% growth year-over-year. The total trips include round trip information from San Francisco to South San Francisco. Ranging from a conservative 5% growth to a robust 20% growth, ferry service has the capacity to grow from a couple of hundred daily passengers in 2021 to over 1,200 daily riders in five years. By Year 2026, at 5% ridership, we anticipate 304 daily riders and at 20% ridership, 1,215 daily riders. File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 11 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ Figure 2 Ridership analysis (figure 2) shows that in order to meet the minimum farebox for a breakeven level of service, a ferry operator would have to meet the minimum threshold of 5% ridership utilizing a 50 passenger vessel. This break even service may start as early as this year. However, in order to breakeven with utilizing a 150 passenger vessel, the minimum threshold is 5% of potential riders beginning in 2024. Anything less than the minimum threshold of 5% does not meet the minimum break even level for service. X - farebox does not meet break even threshold Figure 3 Expansion of ferry service remains an attractive alternative to single occupancy automobile commute. Tideline proposed various routes, with a focus on the North-South connection currently lacking at Oyster Point Marina. File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 12 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ Ferry service provides amenities traditionally provided on other modes of transit including WiFi, concessions onboard, and bike storage. Weekday commuter service from Oyster Point Marina’s guest dock (adjacent to the SPIT) to San Francisco’s Mission Bay ferry landing and the Ferry Building was analyzed with various vessel sizes and landing options. The Mission Bay ferry landing provides a connection between two life science clusters as well as having the potential for expanded weekend service for events at the adjacent Chase Center. The Ferry Building landing connects South San Francisco commuters to the nearby economic center of San Francisco, the Financial District. Compared to traditional bus transit and auto travel, the ferry service transit time between Oyster Point Marina and Mission Bay/Ferry Building is competitive at 35 minutes. During commute hours, the same trip by car can take up to 50 minutes and traditional bus transit 90 minutes. Additionally, Tideline explored future weekend service between Oyster Point Marina and other San Francisco ferry landings including Mission Bay, Oracle Park, Ferry Building, Pier 15, and Hyde Street. Expansion of weekend service benefits our residents with convenient transit service to Oracle Park and the Chase Center for live events. Potential weekend service to all five stops could provide 2 roundtrip trips per day and hold up to 150 passengers. This ferry service would take between 30-90 minutes roundtrip. Comparatively speaking, an automobile trip may take anywhere between 16-50 minutes and traditional transit may take up to 60 minutes. The weekend ferry service would be ADA accessible, provide concessions onboard, WiFi, bike storage, and restrooms. Employee Survey During the annual Transportation Demand Management program, staff provided employers with an optional ferry service survey to gauge the interest of employees East of 101. In light of the File #: 22-229 Agenda Date: 4/1/2022 Version: 1 Item #: 4. City of South San Francisco Page 13 of 16 Printed on 3/30/2022 powered by Legistar™ pandemic, the response sample size was limited at 129 responses. Survey questions focused on the likelihood of employees to take ferry service between San Francisco’s Ferry Building, Oracle Park, Chase Center, and Berkeley Marina and South San Francisco Oyster Point Marina. Additionally, survey questions requested more information on the employee’s arrival and departure times. The majority of employees responded that they would be more likely to take a direct ferry from the Ferry Building to Oyster Point (47%) over other San Francisco locations (Oracle Park and Chase Center). Interestingly, employees did express a likelihood to take a direct ferry from the Berkeley Marina to Oyster Point. Eighty-two percent of employees also indicated that the majority of them would arrive between 7am-9am with 3% arriving before 7am and 15% after 9am. Seventy-nine percent of employees would depart from Oyster Point between 4-6pm with 12% departing after 6pm. This ferry survey supplemented the optional TDM reporting requirement this year. Due to COVID-19, staff did not mandate that employers respond to this survey. Post pandemic, it is staff’s hope to procure more data to better understand our employees needs going forward. Financial Plan Engineering Design $1M Shoring Construction $15-34M Building/Landscape Design $1-2M Building/Landscape Construction $8-10M Total $25-47M Conclusion It is recommended that the Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee receive an update on efforts to address sea level rise at the Spit at Oyster Point. The Spit at Oyster Point SMC Harbor District Liaison Subcommittee April 1, 2022 High Tide Inundation Normal Conditions Flooding ●Comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board mandates ●Resilient to sea level rise and the 2100 100-year base flood elevations as determined by FEMA ●Ferry Terminal for North/South service Why Are We Doing This? Engineering Conceptual Enclosure Layout Proposed Solution -Sheet Pile Wall Project Concepts -Option 1: SPIT to 2100 SLR BFE COMBINATION RETAINING WALL / FLOOD WALL Project Concepts -Option 2: SPIT to 2050 SLR BFE PHASED CONSTRUCTION APPROACH Biology Cost Estimate Table Option 2Option 1 Option 3 Worst Case $30M*$34M* Best Case $15M$17M $45M* Description Phased Construction Approach Combo Retaining Wall / Sea Wall SPIT Removal SLR 2100 2050 *Mitigation Measures are unknown and could be a significant cost. Proposed Phase 1 Maintenance Project •Raises grades of site to accommodate 100 year design storm •Saves Harbor Master Building •Resolves RWQCB violation •Total Cost estimate of $4M to $8M. Note: Concept Dependent on Approval by BCDC. Site Opportunities Transportation Opportunities Expanded Ferry Service -Ridership Study ●Studied regions in SSF and San Francisco to capture users who lived and worked close to the Ferry landing on both locations ●Modeled average daily trips taken between San Francisco and South San Francisco in 2019 ●Ferry commuter service viable between Oyster Point and Mission Bay/Ferry Building landings ●Potential for future expanded weekend service to other SF locations Timeline Site Investigation, Develop Alt & Preliminary Design Environmental Permitting and Clearance Public Outreach Final Design Construction 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Thank You City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-230 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:5. Update on the Kilroy Oyster Point Development project (Jonas Vass, Kilroy Realty) City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 1 KOP Current Status April 1, 2022 Harbor District 22 KILROY OYSTER POINT •10-building campus •50 acres set on South SF waterfront •Two and a half million square feet 33 KOP: PHASE 1 •Three buildings •Approx. 660,000 square feet •100% leased •Delivered Q4 2021 •The Anecdote is now open December 11th, 2021 44 KOP: PHASE 2 55 KOP: PHASE 2 (Cont.) •Three buildings •Approx. 875,000 square feet •Commenced construction in Q2 2021 •Anticipated stabilization Q4 2024 6 CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE 77 KOP: FUTURE PHASES 8 Where Innovation Works City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-231 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:6. Update on the Ensemble Hotel Development at Oyster Point Marina (Ernesto Lucero,Economic and Community Development) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the San Mateo County Harbor District Oyster Point Marina Liaison Committee receive an update on the Ensemble Hotel Development. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The eastern peninsula of Oyster Point was formerly operated as a municipal landfill (landfill)from 1956 until it stopped accepting waste in 1970.It was closed in the 1970s and 1980s in accordance with the State of California Water Quality Control Board (Water Board)regulatory guidelines that governed at that time.The majority of the Oyster Point development area is located over the former landfill and includes multiple office and research and development buildings.The development of Oyster Point covers 41 acres in four phases,as agreed upon in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA)that was executed between Oyster Point Ventures and the City/Redevelopment Agency on March 23, 2011. The DDA and subsequently approved Oyster Point Specific Plan (Specific Plan)identified a 4.7-acre,City- owned parcel as an opportunity site for the development of a full-service hotel development.Attachment 1 is the site map.The Specific Plan provided California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)clearance for up to 350 rooms on the site.The DDA was assigned to Kilroy Realty (Kilroy)in 2018.In accordance with the DDA, Phase I included a clay clap repair of the landfill,relocation of refuse,and grading of the site in preparation for development. In February 2017,staff began an extensive hotel development solicitation and selection process,with the Housing Standing Committee making a recommendation on December 11,2017,to select Ensemble Investments,LLC (Ensemble)for the proposed development.On April 11,2018,the City Council approved Resolution 50-2018 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (ENRA) with Ensemble to negotiate the disposition of the property for the hotel development site. Ensemble,a Long Beach,California-based hotel developer has a strong presence in the Bay Area and brings over thirty years of experience building full and select service hotels.Some comparable projects developed by Ensemble include Hotel Nia in Menlo Park,Hyatt Place in Emeryville,Hyatt Place in Pasadena at The Paseo, and the Dream Inn in Santa Cruz.Its most recent and comparable project in the Bay Area was Hotel Nia,which opened in 2018 as an upper-upscale 11-story,250-room boutique hotel branded under Marriott Autograph Collection, with 24,000 square feet of amenities, meeting space, with food and beverage services. A hotel development at Oyster Point will serve the demand for high quality meeting space by businesses in the City’s biotech cluster.The area currently lacks amenities that an upscale or upper scale hotel would bring to the area,such as restaurants,cafes,day spas,or other complementary uses.New life science construction has surpassed the supply of high quality,upscale hotel brands in the area,making the Oyster Point area a prime City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:22-231 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:6. surpassed the supply of high quality,upscale hotel brands in the area,making the Oyster Point area a prime location for this use.According to hotel market data South San Francisco has had strong regional market demand historically with a high average occupancy rate of 81%. COVID-19 has greatly affected the hotel industry.Occupancy rates,average daily rates (ADR),and revenue per available room (RevPar)have all been impacted by the pandemic.Hotel demand is expected to return and surpass pre-COVID levels by 2026,which is in line with the opening of the hotel proposed by Ensemble in 2027-28. Since April 2018,Ensemble remained in an ENRA with the City while significant due diligence was performed, including analysis of conditions for constructing on the landfill and developing mitigation measures for developing on top of the landfill. The Proposed Project The proposed project is consistent with the Oyster Point Redevelopment Plan adopted by the City Council in 2011, as well as the Oyster Point Specific Plan, both of which envisioned a hotel for this site. The proposed project includes the ground-up construction of a full service,upper-upscale hotel assumed to be under the Marriott Autograph Collection brand.The 341-room,9-story full-service hotel will offer complementary services for hotel guests and the public including meeting space totaling at least 11,500 square feet,a minimum of 4,000 square feet of food and beverage space,and 1.5 acres of open space.Ensemble will be submitting a formal application for entitlements by April 15,2022,and any updates to the programming of the hotel will be provided to the City by then. The disposition of the City-owned site is the culmination of a long process beginning with the closure of the landfill in 1970,the Oyster Point Master Redevelopment Plan vision developed from the DDA and Oyster Point Specific Plan in 2011,to the current recommendation of approving a PSA with Ensemble on a hotel development of the site.The vision for the site as a high-quality hotel will capitalize on an untapped opportunity for a high-quality development as it features waterfront views,is located just steps from the South San Francisco Ferry Terminal,and is within close proximity of the City’s biotech cluster and San Francisco International Airport.Its financial benefits to the City and job creation,coupled with its opportunity to create a destination at Oyster Point make the project attractive. During the ENRA,significant effort was made to ensure a development of this type was not only financially feasible,but also environmentally suitable for development ensuring any risk to the City was very low. Considering the risks,Ensemble will be incorporating significant mitigation measures consistent with other current developments on similar sites throughout the state. Ensemble is moving through the process of negotiating a DA and applying for entitlements.In 2023,Ensemble would go through the building permit process,with construction beginning in 2024/25.The hotel plans to open sometime in 2027/28. The City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Ensemble Investments,LLC for the disposition of a City-owned property located at 367 Marina Boulevard on October 27, 2021. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ File #:22-231 Agenda Date:4/1/2022 Version:1 Item #:6. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the San Mateo County Harbor District Oyster Point Marina Liaison Committee receive an update on the Ensemble Hotel Development. City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/18/2022Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Update on Ensemble Hotel Development at Oyster Point Marina Harbor District Liaison Standing Committee April 1, 2022