HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-04-26 e-packet@6:00Tuesday, April 26, 2022
1:00 PM
City of South San Francisco
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
TELECONFERENCE MEETING
Zoom Link: https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/84708987047
Budget Standing Committee of the City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
April 26, 2022Budget Standing Committee of the
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
TELECONFERENCE MEETING NOTICE
The Budget Standing Committee may meet by teleconference, consistent with the Brown Act as
amended by AB 361 (2021). Under the amended rules, the City will not provide a physical location for
members of the public to participate in the teleconference meeting.
The purpose of conducting the meeting as described in this notice is to provide the safest environment for staff
and the public while allowing for public participation.
Vice Mayor Nicolas, Councilmember Addiego and essential City staff will participate via Teleconference.
PURSUANT TO RALPH M. BROWN ACT, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, ALL VOTES
SHALL BE BY ROLL CALL DUE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS PARTICIPATING BY
TELECONFERENCE.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY VIEW A VIDEO BROADCAST OF THE MEETING BY:
Via Zoom:
Join Zoom meeting
https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/84708987047
(Enter your email and name)
Join by One Tap Mobile :
US: +16699006833,,84708987047# or +13462487799,,84708987047#
Join by Telephone:
Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free)
Webinar ID: 847 0898 7047
Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/4/2022
April 26, 2022Budget Standing Committee of the
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to
comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa
Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at [email protected].
Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and
preferred alternative format service at least 24-hours before the meeting.
Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or
accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the
Office of the City Clerk by email at [email protected], 24-hours before the meeting.
Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City of South San Francisco to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting.
Call To Order.
Roll Call.
Agenda Review.
Remote Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda.
Speakers are allowed to speak on items on the agenda for up to three minutes. If there appears to be a large
number of speakers, speaking time may be reduced subject to the Mayor ’s discretion to limit the total amount
of time for public comments (Gov. Code sec. 54954.3.(b)(1).). Comments that are not in compliance with the
City Council's rules of decorum may be summarized for the record if they are in writing or muted if they are
made live.
HOW TO SUBMIT WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE THE MEETING
Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting via the
eComment tab by 11:00 a.m. on the meeting date.
Use the eComment portal by clicking on the following link: https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings or by
visiting the City Council meeting's agenda page. eComments are also directly sent to the iLegislate application
used by Committee Members and staff.
Comments received by the deadline will be included as part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud
during the meeting.
Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/4/2022
April 26, 2022Budget Standing Committee of the
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE MEETING
Members of the public who wish to provide comment during the meeting may do so by using the “Raise Hand”
feature:
• To raise your hand on a PC or Mac desktop/laptop, click the button labeled "Raise Hand” at the bottom of
the window on the right side of the screen. Lower your hand by clicking the same button, now labeled “Lower
Hand.”
• To raise your hand on a mobile device, tap “Raise Hand” at the bottom left corner of the screen. The hand
icon will turn blue, and the text below it will switch to say "Lower Hand" while your hand is raised. To lower
your hand, click on “Lower Hand.”
• To raise your hand when participating by telephone, press *9.
• To toggle mute/unmute, press *6.
Once your hand is raised, please wait to be acknowledged by the City Clerk, or designee, who will call on
speakers. When called upon, speakers will be unmuted. After the allotted time, speakers will be placed on
mute.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of February 8, 2022.1.
Report regarding the proposed amendments to the Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal
Year 2022-23 (Jason Wong, Acting Director of Finance)
2.
Report regarding Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) at Orange Memorial Park; the
Sports Field Project and Aquatic Center Project, Bridges Replacement Project and
Playground Replacement with recommended bond funding strategies. (Jacob Gilchrist,
Director Capital Project, and Jason Wong, Acting Finance Director)
3.
Adjournment.
Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 5/4/2022
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:22-295 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:1.
Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of February 8, 2022.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
Call to Order. Time: 4:01 p.m.
Roll Call. PRESENT: Vice Mayor Nicolas and
Councilmember Addiego.
AGENDA REVIEW
No changes.
REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of September 28, 2021.
Motion – Councilmember Addiego / Second –Vice Mayor Nicolas: to approve the minutes. The motion
carried unanimously.
2. Report regarding the Annual Comprehensive Finance Report for fiscal year ended June 30, 2021,
mid-year update for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, and additional appropriation considerations.
(Janet Salisbury, Director of Finance)
Director Salisbury presented the Annual Comprehensive Finance Report for fiscal year ended June 20,
2021, mid-year update for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, and additional appropriation considerations.
Councilmember Addiego inquired whether there was a mechanism that would allow the city to
temporarily lower or eliminate the 14% Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). City Attorney Woodruff
advised that he would need to double-check how the ordinances were written. He included that the
original tax predated Proposition 218, and there were subsequent increases that had voters’ approval. City
Attorney Woodruff advised that the Council could grant a holiday for the not voter-approved portion but
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
BUDGET STANDING
COMMITTEE
OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, California 94083
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2022
4:00 p.m.
Teleconference via Zoom
Housing Standing Committee may meet by teleconference,
consistent with the Brown Act as amended by AB 361 (2021.
Under the amended rules, the City will not provide a physical
location for members of the public to participate in the
teleconference meeting.
SPECIAL BUDGET STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 8, 2021
MINUTES PAGE 2
would have to levy the voter-approved amount.
Vice Mayor Nicolas inquired why the City Manager’s Office funded the Irrigation Designer position.
City Manager Futrell advised that Capital Projects Director Gilchrist requested to be housed in the City
Manager’s Office. Director Salisbury added that the Irrigation Designer position was assigned to the City
Manager’s Office for the study and could be moved to the Capital Improvement Project fund.
Councilmember Addiego inquired whether, at some point, the Mental Health Clinician position would
become part of the Police Department budget. City Manager Futrell advised that they could include the
position as part of the Police Department budget for next year.
Councilmember Addiego was reluctant to assign $150,000 for a Concert in the Park if something
unknown occurred and assembly of mass gatherings was not ideal. Director of Parks and Recreation
Mediati advised that he was still working with the event vendor regarding the cancellation policy.
Traditionally, they did not put down a deposit that would amount to half of the production costs. He
added that the deposit would be transferable to a future event.
Councilmember Addiego requested additional information regarding the Parks and Recreation Vehicle
Replacement budget request of $820,000. Director Mediati stated that the funding would include five
new fleet vehicles and six replacements of existing or aged vehicles scheduled for replacement. He added
that they were upgrading one John Deere large mower to an EV mower. Staff was also getting a trencher
for digging. Director Mediati was hoping to continue electrifying the fleet of vehicles and was looking at
piloting some small truck EV vehicles.
City Manager Futrell thanked the committee members for their feedback and advised staff would present
their report to the entire City Council at the next meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business, Vice Mayor Nicolas adjourned the meeting at 5:05 p.m.
Submitted by: Approved by:
Gabriel Rodriguez Flor Nicolas
Deputy City Clerk Vice Mayor
Approved by the Budget Standing Committee: / /
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:22-300 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:2.
Report regarding the proposed amendments to the Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (Jason Wong,
Acting Director of Finance)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Budget Standing Committee provide feedback regarding the adoption of
proposed updates to the City of South San Francisco Master Fee Schedule.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Unlike general city services such as public safety,streets,and other infrastructure that benefit the entire
community,which are primarily supported by tax revenues,discretionary services that benefit a specific user
group (rather than the entire community)are typically funded in whole,or in part,by user fees.Any amount not
covered by user fees are then subsidized typically by General Fund tax dollars or other available sources.Under
State law,public agencies,like the City of South San Francisco are permitted to recover the costs associated
with providing certain services considered to be a “personal choice”or “user fees.”Such services are provided
to a specific customer for their singular benefit.Some examples of those services are building permits or
recreation classes, which benefit the individual and not the community.
By law,most user fees may not exceed the reasonable cost of the service for which they are collected:
Propositions 218 and 26 amended Article XIII C of the California Constitution to require that user fees be
limited to the City's reasonable cost of providing the service or benefit.While City Council can set fees by a
simple majority vote,any fee that exceeds the reasonable cost of providing the service or benefit becomes a tax,
which requires approval by a two-thirds vote of the electorate.In order to ensure that it is charging appropriate
fees for its services,and to comply with the requirements of Propositions 218 and 26,local agencies typically
perform periodic studies to assess their costs of providing services prior to increasing existing fees or adopting
new fees.
Under best business practices,a user fee study should be conducted every three to five years to ensure the
City’s fee structure is well aligned with the goal of cost recovery and fees being charged do not exceed the
City’s cost of providing the services.
On August 28,2019,City Council adopted a resolution approving a contract with Matrix Consulting Group to
conduct a comprehensive user fee analysis with the goal of identifying the actual cost of providing fee-related
City services and understanding recovery levels for each fee.The study was completed in August 2020.
However,given the sudden shift on City operations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic,much of the
assumptions related to labor cost ceased to be valid.
As such,staff intends to request another comprehensive user fee study in 2022 to re-evaluate the City’s cost
recovery strategy as the pandemic continues.
On March 23,2022,City Council approved an amendment to the Public Works Engineering section of the
Master Fee Schedule for FY 2022-23 via Resolution 37-2022.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-300 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:2.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics calculated the change in Consumer Price Index (CPI)for All Urban Consumers
for the San Francisco -Oakland -Hayward area between February 2021 and February 2022 to be 5.2%.Staff
recommends the Master Fee Schedule for FY 2022-23 be amended to reflect a 5%increase from prior fiscal
year.
On April 19,2022,the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended City Council approval of the 5%rate
increase for Parks and Recreation fees.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
The proposed FY 2022-23 Master Fee Schedule largely reflects a 5%across the board increase to most fees
(except for those charged by Public Works Engineering Division).Some fees remain unchanged due to state
mandate limits and some fees have been rounded up and down to the nearest dollar.The following highlights
other notable changes:
·Fire Construction Inspection Cancellation Fee
This is a new fee proposed by the Fire department for inspections that are cancelled in less than 24
hours prior to the inspection appointment.Cancellation fee is $94.50 which is 50%of hourly rate for
inspection.
·Breezeway Open Space Rental
This is a new fee proposed by Parks &Recreation Department for a new open space area that is
available for private rental on the weekends.
·ECD Planning Division - User Fees Previously Identified as Deposits
As a result of the 2017 user fee study,various deposits were introduced to the ECD Planning section of
the Master Fee Schedule.The deposit amounts were calculated as the estimated cost of providing
services at that time.Staff recommend converting these calculated amounts to flat fees,rather than as
deposits. The proposed fees do not exceed the estimated cost of providing the services.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Budget Standing Committee provide feedback in advance of the City Council
adoption currently anticipated for May 25,2022.The proposed Master Fee Schedule is provided in Attachment
1.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Master Fee schedule reflects a reasonable change in overall fees taking into considerations the
change in CPI and the recent cost recovery re-alignments by Public Works Engineering Division and ECD
Planning Division.
RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN
This effort supports the City’s strategic initiative (Priority Area 3) of ensuring fiscal stability.
CONCLUSION
If approved as proposed,based on the current schedule,the new Master Fee Schedule will go into effect on July
24, 2022.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-300 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:2.
Attachments
1.FY 2022-23 Proposed Master Fee Schedule
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Agendas, Transcripts,
Administrative
CC1 Annually [6] $ 43
CC2 Annually $ 38
CC3 Annually $ 38
CC4
[7] Actual Cost
Per Page [7] $ 0.10
Subpoena Processing
CC5 Per Hr/Per Person
[1] $ 15
CC6 Per Hr/Per
Person [4] $ 24
CC7 Per Page [5,7] $ 0.10
CC8 Per Page [7] $ 0.20
CC9
Per Day [8] $ 161
CC10
Per Day [8] $ 275
Per Day [8] $ 275
Per Day [8] $ 275
CC11 Per Day [8] $ 161
CC12 Per Day $ 297
Per Day [8] $ 297
Per Day [8] $ 297
Other Fees
CC13 Per Page [9] $ 0.10
CC14 Deposit [2] $ 1,056
CC15
Flat [7] No Charge
CC16 Flat $ 58
CC17 Flat $ 9
CC18 Flat Actual Cost
CC19 Per CD $ 20
CC20
Per CD $ 13
Per CD $ 20
Per CD $ 29
City‐Wide Reproduction
of Printed
CC21
Per s.f. [7] Actual Cost
Per s.f. [7] Actual Cost
Blueprinting:
Blue Line copies
Sepia Line copies ($4 minimum)
Standard reproduction of documents 8 1/2 x 14
inches or less
Standard reproduction of larger size documents
Daily cost for a non ‐public safety employee required to
remain in attendance pursuant to a
subpoena
Folio Rate
Additional Copies
Copy of CD/DVD
External file
Non‐existing file
City Clerk Meeting
Complying with each subpoena and delivering records to
attorney, attorney's representative, or
deposition officer
Duplication of Videotapes onto DVDs/CDs
Preparing Proof of Residence Letters or
Notarizing Proof of Living Documents
Postage
Duplication of Council meeting audio file to CD
Campaign Disclosure Statements (FPPC)
Candidate Statements
Candidates Election Manual
(for non ‐candidates, persons who fail to file nomination
papers, or withdraw candidacy)
Daily cost for public safety custodian of records to
appear to describe records
Police ‐ Sworn
Fire
Successor Agency
Oversight Board or any other legislative body
Transcripts
CITY CLERK
Fee Description
Agendas: City Council
Daily cost for a public safety employee required
to remain in attendance pursuant to a subpoena
Police ‐ Sworn
Fire
Daily cost for a custodian of records to appear to
describe records
Clerical costs incurred in locating and making
records available
Page 1
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
CC22 Per Page [3,5,7] $ 0.10
CC24 Flat [7] Actual Cost
CC25 Per application $ 35.00
[Notes]
[1],[2],[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
CM1 Per Permit $ 306
CITY MANAGER
Fee Description
Film Permit
This fee does not include charges for time spent by City
staff gathering City records under the Public Records Act.
Rather, it charges for time spent compiling and gathering
data and putting it into another format requested by a
member of the public, which is not covered under the Public
Records Act. Note that requests for analysis or compilation
of City data are discretionary requests, and are dependent
on staff availability
Per Public Records Act ($ .10 per page). Ten cents
($0.10) per page for standard
Agendas that are emailed have no charge.
Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost analysis . Government Code Section 8211
specifies the maximum fees that may be charged for notary
public services
Maximum daily cost.
[9] Set by Government Code 81008 at $0.10
per page
Execution fee (Flat) for passport application
Sourced from client provided PDF "FY 16 ‐17
Fee Description
Photocopying of all items not otherwise listed in
this Master Fee Schedule
Published materials for which there is a stated
cost.
CITY CLERK
Page 2
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Planning Division
Public Hearing Cases
PL1 Flat [5] $ 10,543
PL2 Flat [5] $ 10,543
PL3 Flat [5] $ 6,844
PL4
Per
Application [5] $ 3,707
Per
Application [5] $ 4,807
PL5 Flat [1,5] $ 2,499
PL6 Per Permit [5] $ 1,764
PL7
Per Permit [5] $ 2,035
Per Permit $ 1,848
PL7A Flat $ 4,434
Flat $ 4,655
per pole $ 1,003
per pole $ 1,663
PL8 Flat $ 9,237
PL9 Flat $ 9,237
PL10 Per Verification $ 185
PL11 Flat [5] $ 22,569
PL12 For each
variance $ 4,618
PL13 Flat [5] $ 10,540
PL14 Flat [5] $ 22,381Master Plan
Specific Plan
Variance
General Plan Amendments
Zoning Amendment (Text)
Rezoning Map
Site Clearance/Zoning Verification
for City‐owned poles or structures
Use Permit
For privately ‐owned poles or structures
Administrative Deposit
Attachment Fee / Annual Rent
All Others
Small Cell
Master Licensing Agreement (MLA) Deposit
Conditional Use Permit Modification
Temporary Use Permit
Minor Use Permit
Residential
Conditional Use Permit:
Residential or Civic Use
All Others
Planned Unit Development
Precise Plan
Precise Plan Modification (Residential Only)
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ PLANNING DIVISION
Fee Description
Page 3
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Planning Division
PL15 Flat [5] $ 19,729
PL16
Flat $ 1,848
Flat $ 923
Flat $ 1,848
Flat $ 1,848
Flat $ 1,848
PL17 Per Appeal $ 923
PL18 Per
Extension $ 923
PL19
Per Extension $ 923
PL20
Flat $ 1,293
Flat $ 1,848
Flat [2] $ 1,848
PL21
Flat $ 277
Flat $ 1,848
PL22
Per Application $ 185
Per Application $ 923
Per Application $ 1,848
PL23 Per Application [5] $ 1,298
PL24
Per Application [5] $ 2,314
PL25 Per Application [5] $ 2,784
PL26 Flat [5] $ 2,687
PL27 Flat [5] $ 2,687
PL28 Flat $ 185
PL29
Flat [2] $ 5,543
PL30 Flat [3] $ 11,084
PL31 Flat $ 923
Environmental Document Fees ‐ Initial Study, Negative
Declaration, Mitigated Negative
Declaration and other Contract Planning Studies
Environmental Document Fees ‐ Environmental
Impact Report (EIR)
Subdivisions ‐ Tentative Subdivision Map
Design Review ‐ Projects Requiring Planning
Commission Approval
Design Review ‐ Resubmitted (after 2 reviews by
Design Review Board)
Environmental Document Fees ‐ Categorical
Exemption
Design Review ‐ Single Family Residential/New or
Additions to 2 or 3 Units
Design Review ‐ Multi‐Family Residential / Subdivisions 4 or
More Units/ Modifications /
Additions to 4 or More Units
Design Review ‐ Commercial and Industrial
Major (Planning Commission Review)
Design Review ‐ Signs:
Type A (up to 25 sq.ft.)
Type B (up to 100 sq.ft.)
Type C / Master Sign
Annual Monitoring (plus survey cost)
Tri‐annual
Modifications & Waivers
Minor (Staff Review)
Time Extension‐Non‐Conforming Use
Time Extension for a Use Permit, Planned Unit
Development Permit, Non‐Conforming Status Permit, and for
all Other Permits and Maps
Transportation Demand Management Plan:
Initial Filing Fee
City Resident
Homeowners Association
All Others
Appeal of the Chief Planner's decision to the
Planning Commission by any party
Development Agreement
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to
the City Council by:
Applicant
Adjacent Property Owner
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ PLANNING DIVISION
Fee Description
Page 4
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
PL32 Flat $ 185
PL33 Per Page Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
Miscellaneous Fees
PL34 Flat $ 185
PL35 Per Building
Permit [4] $ 29
PL36 Per Inspection Per
Application $ 370
PL37 Each $ 1,848
PL38
[4]
0.16% of Building Permit
valuation >
$100K
PL39 Per sq. ft. [4] $ 8
PL40 Deposit [4] Actual Cost*
PL41 Each $ 1,848
PL42 Flat $ 9,238
PL43 Flat $ 554
PL44 Flat $ 554
PL45 Per Copy Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
PL46 Flat $ 923
PL47 Flat $ 923
PL48 Flat $ 185
PL49 Flat $ 554
PL50 Flat $ 185
PL51 Each $ 636
PL52 Percentage of Building
Permit Fee 5%
PL53 Percentage of Building
Permit Fee 5%
PL54 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] Includes support costs from other departments
(PW‐Eng, Fire and Police)
The greater of 1/2 the Conditional Use Permit fee
or $400 for each
Consultant costs, plus 15% or $500, whichever is
greater.
Consultant costs, plus 15% or $1,000, whichever
is greater.
Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost
Construction Coordination for Active Building
Permits
Credit Card Transaction fees
Hourly Rate ‐ Planning
Single Family Residential (New or Remodel)
Multi‐Family / Commercial / Industrial (New or
Tenant Improvement)
Zoning Administrator Decision
Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (taxi)
Sidewalk Dining Permit (Annual)
Legal Notices, other than Zoning or General Plan
Amendments
Legal Notices for Zoning and General Plan
Amendments
Duplication of Planning Commission Meeting
Zoning Verification Letter
*Actual cost with $2,000 deposit; $5,000 deposit for projects
requiring Environmental Impact Reports, Development
Agreements, Specific Plan, Precise Plan and/or GPA (Initial
Deposit ‐ any additional costs are required to be reimbursed
by the applicant)
[June 22, 2011; R 85 ‐2011]
Economic & Community Development Parking
Exemption
Economic & Community Development Parking
District Annexation Fee
General Plan Maintenance Fee
Cultural Arts Contribution/Unit Landscaping Cost
City Attorney Cost Recovery Fee
Database Maintenance Fee
Inspection Fees: Additional visits
Certificate of Alteration
Minor Changes to Approved Permit
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ PLANNING DIVISION
Fee Description
Subdivisions ‐ Tentative Parcel Map
Documents, Maps and Plans ‐ Reproduction of
Documents and Maps
Page 5
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
H1 Each $ 540
H2 Each $ 608
H3 Each $ 1014
H3 Each $ 296
H4 Each $ 351
H5 Each $ 485
H6 Each Actual Cost
H7 Each $ 296
H8 Each $ 351
H9 Each $ 485
H10 Each $ 134
H11 Each Actual Cost
H12 Each $ 54
H13 Per Development $ 174
H14 Each $ 338
H15 Each $ 770
H16 Each $ 54
H17 Each $ 1,709
H18 Each $ 889
H19 Each $ 1,315TEFRA Hearing
Multi‐Family
Payoff Demand
Resale Administration ‐ Single Family / Condo
Real Estate Transactions
Initial Consideration for Purchase Offers
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility
BMR Monitoring
Condos (per unit)
Rentals (per development)
Refinance and/or Subordination of Agreement
or Loan
Single Family or Condo
Consultant Costs
Initial Lease Up of Rental BMR Units
Less than 10 BMR units
10‐50 BMR units
More than 50 BMR units
Non‐profit, fully‐affordable project
Agreement Preparation
Agreement Preparation ‐ with waiver or
Modification
Initial Sale of For‐Sale BMR Units
Less than 10 BMR units
10‐50 BMR units
More than 50 BMR units
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ HOUSING DIVISION
Fee Description
Development Application Including Affordable
Housing
Application (review BMR Plan)
Consultant Costs
Page 6
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Building Inspection Divisio
Inspections and
Building, Plumbing,
Electrical, and
Mechanical for
BL1 Per Hour $ 120
BL2 Per Hour $ 120
BL3
base fee @ $500 $ 90
base fee @ $500 $ 90
each add'l $100 $ 2.14
base fee @ $2,000 $ 120
each add'l $1,000 $ 25.70
base fee @ $25,000 $ 719
each add'l $1,000 $ 28.92
base fee @ $50,000 $ 1,437
each add'l $1,000 $ 14.37
base fee @ $100,000 $ 2,157
each add'l $1,000 $ 8.99
base fee @ $500,000 $ 5,752
each add'l $1,000 $ 17.25
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 10,065
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.80
base fee @ $3,000,000 $ 17,973
each add'l $1,000 $ 2.22
base fee @ $5,000,000 $ 21,568
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.96
base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 26,360
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.96
base fee @ $25,000,000 $ 40,739
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.48
base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 52,722
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.05
BL4
base fee @ $500 $ 30
base fee @ $500 $ 30
each add'l $100 $ 2.00
base fee @ $2,000 $ 58
each add'l $1,000 $ 9.12
$ 2,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Building Plan Checking (3 Plan Reviews) ‐ Existing
Residential
$0 ‐ $500
$ 501
each additional $100 or fraction thereof
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 10,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 3,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 5,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
$0 ‐ $500
$ 501
each additional $100 or fraction thereof
$ 2,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,001
Inspections or Re‐inspections Outside Normal
Business Hours
Re‐inspections During Normal Business Hours
Building Inspection
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ BUILDING DIVISION
Fee Description
Page 7
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
base fee @ $25,000 $ 299
each add'l $1,000 $ 11.98
base fee @ $50,000 $ 528
each add'l $1,000 $ 11.98
base fee @ $100,000 $ 1,198
each add'l $1,000 $ 5.99
base fee @ $500,000 $ 3,595
each add'l $1,000 $ 4.79
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 5,991
each add'l $1,000 $ 5.99
BL5
base fee @ $500 $ 34
base fee @ $500 $ 34
each add'l $100 $ 2.00
base fee @ $2,000 $ 75
each add'l $1,000 $ 14.33
base fee @ $25,000 $ 373
each add'l $1,000 $ 16.77
base fee @ $50,000 $ 602
each add'l $1,000 $ 16.77
base fee @ $100,000 $ 1,677
each add'l $1,000 $ 4.19
base fee @ $500,000 $ 3,356
each add'l $1,000 $ 7.67
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 7,189
each add'l $1,000 $ 2.39
base fee @ $3,000,000 $ 11,982
each add'l $1,000 $ 3.59
base fee @ $5,000,000 $ 19,171
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.45
base fee @ $10,000,00 0$ 26,360
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.64
base fee @ $25,000,00 0$ 35,946
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.19
base fee @ $50,000,00 0$ 40,739
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.83
BL5.1
35% of Plan check fee
BL6
$ 239
BL6.1
$ 40
BL7
base fee @ $500 $ 30
base fee @ $500 $ 30
each add'l $100 $ 11.98
base fee @ $1,000 $ 60
each add'l $500 $ 7.50
base fee @ $3,000 $ 75
each add'l $500 $ 22
base fee @ $5,000 $ 120
each add'l $500 $ 11.98
base fee @ $10,000 $ 180
each add'l $500 $ 17.98
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 5,000
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 10,000
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$0 ‐ $500
$ 500
each additional $100 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 3,000
Expedited Building Plan Check Fee
Permit Processing ‐ Initial Project Input, Fee Collection
(Includes Exisiting/New Residential &
Commercial Fees)
Permit Processing ‐ Initial Project Input, Fee Collection
(Includes Mechanical, Plumbing and
Electrical Fees)
Plan Checking ‐ Mechanical and Plumbing
(Includes 3 Plan Reviews)
$ 10,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 3,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 5,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 501
each additional $100 or fraction thereof
$ 2,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Building Plan Checking (3 Plan Reviews) ‐ New
Residential & Commercial
$0 ‐ $500
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ BUILDING DIVISION
Fee Description
$ 25,001
Page 8
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
BL8
base fee @ $500 $ 30
each add'l $100 $ 11.98
base fee @ $1,000 $ 60
each add'l $500 $ 7.50
base fee @ $3,000 $ 75
each add'l $500 $ 22.47
base fee @ $5,000 $ 120
each add'l $500 $ 11.98
base fee @ $10,000 $ 180
each add'l $500 $ 17.98
BL8.1 25% of plan check fee
BL9 Per Half‐ Hour $ 60
BL10 Per Permit $ 8
BL11 deleted micro filming ‐
same as DPR
$0.04 per standard page.
$1.03 per oversized
page.
$0.05 per microfiche
scan.
BL12 Per page Refer to City Clerk
Fee Schedule
BL13 Actual Cost +
CW overhead
BL14 Deposit [2]
$56/ton
$200 minimum
BL15 Deposit [1]
$56/ton
$100 minimum
BL16 Flat [3] $ 419
BL17 Flat [3] $ 239
BL18 Flat $ 120
BL19 Per Permit $ 29
BL20 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3]
Deposit required @ $50/ton. $200 minimum per
plan, $50,000 maximum deposit
CA Govt. Code SS 66015 limits Res. $500
maximum; Comm. $1,000 Maximum
Database Maintenance Fee
Credit Card Transaction fees
Deposit required @ $50/ton. $100 minimum per
Commercial Photovoltaic
Residential Photovoltaic
Hourly Rate ‐ Building
California Access Specialist Professional (CASp)
Construction and Demolition (Projects > $5,000
demolition and new construction > $50,000)
Waste Management Plan Deposit
State Mandated Training Fee Cost
Digital Plan Retention
Record Copying
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
Title 24 Energy Plan Check Surcharge
Additional Plan Review Required by Changes,
additions or revisions to approved plans
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 3,000
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 5,000
each additional $500 or fraction thereof
$ 10,000
Fee Description
Plan Checking ‐ Electrical (Includes 3 Plan
Reviews)
$ 500
each additional $100 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT‐ BUILDING DIVISION
Page 9
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Fees for the Annual
Budget, Comprehensive
Annual Financial
F1
Per List $ 9
Per Update $ 9
Per License $ 29
F2 Monthly [1,3] 1% of Bill
F3
Per Application $ 8,344
Per Inspection $ 399
Per Business $ 16,931
F4 Per Check [2] $ 26
F5 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3] Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost analysis
Returned Checks Due to Insufficient Funds
Credit Card Transaction fees
One percent monthly beginning 60 days after the date on
which the bill was due.
Per CA Civil Code; 1st NSF Check is limited to $25 fee; each
subsequent NSF check is limited to $35 fee
Cannabis Opeartor Fees
Cannabis Operator Permit Application
Cannabis Business Inspection
Cannabis Operator Permit
Business License:
Master List
Monthly Update
Database Maintenance Fee
Overdue Invoices ($10 minimum)
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Page 10
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Alarms, Animal Control,
Fingerprinting
P1
Per Person [1] $ 62
$ 81
Permits
P2
Flat $ 29
P3 [2]
Per alarm $ 113
Per alarm $ 226
Per alarm $ 567
Flat [8]
P4 Per appeal $ 62
P5 Per Permit [7] $ 62
Flat $ 62
Per Renewal $ 578
P6
Flat $ 1,931
Flat $ 384
Flat $ 97
Flat $ 97
P7 Per individual $ 62
Flat $ 62
P8
Per individual $ 7,735
Per Driver $ 193
P9 Flat [5] $ 282
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Flat [5] $ 198
P10 Per individual $ 97
P11
Per individual $ 1,931
Per individual $ 193
P13
Per Permit $ 1,931
Per Permit $ 384
P14 Per Permit $ 1,931
P15
Flat $ 193
Per Driver $ 193
P16
Per Vehicle $ 57
Per Permit $ 45
Per Permit $ 45
P17 Per Copy $ 62Photographs ‐ Digital Photographs on Disks
Renewal:
Tow Service Franchise Fee
Replacement of Lost, Stolen, or Mutilated
Permits
Reissued Permits
Fortune Telling
Tow Vehicle Operator:
Initial Permit/ Annual Renewal
Tow Vehicle Driver Permit (Five‐Year)
Initial Permit
Annual Renewal
Pawnbroker/Secondhand Goods Background
Investigation:
Dealer
Employee
Fee Description
Non‐Profit Group / Charity Event
Junk Collector
Massage Establishment or Bath House:
Vehicles for Hire:
Initial Certificate of Convenience and
Necessity
Certificate of Renewal
Special Event Permit
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Annual Renewal (for operator & employee
permit)
Replacement
Cab Company
Driver Renewal Permit
Initial Permit (Refundable if denied)
Annual Renewal
Card room I.D. Card:
Initial Operator Permit
Initial Employee Permit
False Alarm Response (average)
False Alarm Fine Appeal
Bingo
New/ Renewal
False Alarm Fines
2nd alarm (Within 12 months of 1st alarm)
3rd alarm (Within 12 months of 1st alarm)
4th and other additional alarms within 12
months of the 1st preventable alarm
All individuals (City Employees excluded)
Live Scan Fingerprinting
Alarm Registration (Commercial)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Fingerprints
Page 11
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Miscellaneous Fees
P18 Per Vehicle [3] $ 384
P19 Per Copy $ 57
P20 Per Copy $ 57
P21 Per Copy $ 113
P22 Per Copy $ 57
P23 Per Copy $ 57
P24 Per Page Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
P25 [4]
Per Hour $ 124
Per Hour $ 102
P26 Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
P27 [5,6] Actual Costs
[5] Actual Costs
P28 Per Vehicle $ 193
P29 flat $ 193
P30 Hourly $ 193
P31
Flat $ 384
Flat $ 384
P32 $ 153
P33 Flat $ 11
P34
$ 193
$ 113
P35 Per Permit $ 29
P36 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
P37 Per Copy $ 57
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
On public roadway only.
Hourly salary plus 40% for benefits plus 30% in
administration charges; 30 ‐minute
Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost analysis
CA GC 53150 ‐53159 DUI Maximum $12,000
Penal code: SSFMC Ch. 6.32
For Informational Purpose only
Credit Card Transaction fees
Up to three cards per individual.
Resets every calendar year.
Hourly Rate:
Sworn
Non‐Sworn
Database Maintenance Fee
Single Firearm
Each Additional Weapon
Ammunition Storage Administration Fee
Clearance Letter
Plan Check & Condition Formulation (Bldg)
Site Inspections
Firearm Storage Administration Fee
Transcripts
Emergency Response to Driving Under the
Influce (DUI) Accidents
Incident Response (includes Accident, Hazmat,
DUI or other incident)
Towed Vehicle Release, Negligent Operator
Special Personnel Services
Security Personnel (Police Officer)
Staff Police Officer
Discounted Rate for SSFUSD
Cassette Tape
CD ‐ Audio
Police Reports
Video Tape
DVD Video
In Car/ Bodycam Video ‐ DVD
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Vehicle Abatement
Flash Drive
Page 12
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F1 Transport $ 2,161
F2 $ 2,161
F3 $ 2,161
F4 $ 754
F6 Flat [5] $ 444
F7 Per Mile [3] $ 57
F8 Flat [3] $ 137
Fire Service EMS Training
F9
Per person [3] $ 34
F10 Per person [3] $ 113
F11 Per person [3] $ 62
F12 Per person [3] $ 57
F13 Per person [3] $ 137
F14
Per person [3] $ 198
F15
Per person [3] $ 266
Per person [3] $ 266
Per person [3] $ 86
F16
Per person [3] $ 215
Per person [3] $ 215
Per person [3] $ 57
F17 Per person [3] $ 226
F18 Per person [3] $ 215
F19 Per person [3] $ 91
F20 Per Hour Per Person [3] $ 8.87
F21 Actual Cost
Other EMS Continuing Education Classes
Student Materials, Supplies, etc. Required to
Participate
Lead EKG Class
Geriatric Education for Emergency Medical
Services
Infrequent Paramedic Skills
Re‐recognition:
Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)
Advance Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)
Basic Life Support ‐Health Care Provider (BLS
HCP)
ACLS Knowledge and Skills Review
Workshops
Initial Recognition:
Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)
Advance Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)
Basic Life Support‐Health Care Provider (BLS
HCP)
HeartSaver® CPR/AED Community Classes
Pediatric Education for Pre‐hospital
Professionals (For residents and non‐residents)
American Heart Association "Professional Level"
courses for the public and other outside agencies
HeartSaver Adult First ‐Aid ,CPR, AED Classes for Residents
(cost of textbook and certification card)
HeartSaver Adult First‐Aid,CPR,AED Classes for
First‐Aid / CPR Classes for SSF Businesses
Mileage (All levels)
Oxygen
Fire Service Ambulance Transportation ‐ BLS
(Emergency)
Fire Service Ambulance Transportation ‐ BLS
(Non‐Emergency)
Contracted BLS Inter‐Facility
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Fire Service Ambulance Transportation ‐ ALS I
Fire Service Ambulance Transportation ‐ ALS II
Page 13
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F22 Flat $ 5.54
Fire Training Division
F23 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F24 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F25 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F26 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F27 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F28 Per Hour Per Person [5] $ 32
F29 Actual Cost
F30 Flat Actual Cost
Fire Prevention Division
Permits and
Fire Code Construction
Permit
F32 [3]2 Times cost of
Permit
F33
Minimum base fee up to
$6,000 $ 565
base fee @ $6,000 $ 565
each add'l $1,000 $ 9.89
base fee @ $25,000 $ 753
each add'l $1,000 $ 15.06
base fee @ $50,000 $ 1,129
each add'l $1,000 $ 7.53
base fee @ $100,000 $ 1,506
each add'l $1,000 $ 4.70
base fee @ $500,000 $ 3,386
each add'l $1,000 $ 8.27
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 7,526
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.95
base fee @ $3,000,000 $ 9,407
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.95
base fee @ $5,000,000 $ 11,288
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.51
base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 13,797
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.51
base fee @ $25,000,000 $ 21,321
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.24
base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 27,592
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.56
F34 $ 94.50
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Inspection Cancellation Fees (Less than 24 hours)
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
10,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
25,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
50,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
3,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
5,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
Fire Code Permits Inspection Fees
(Inspection ‐ includes 2 inspections)
$0 ‐ $6,000
$ 6,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,001
Installation or Modification Without a Permit
Other Fire Training Continuing Education Classes
Student Materials, Supplies, etc. Required to
Participate
Certification Fees required by Certifying
Authority
Hazardous Materials Responder Class
Technical Rescue Class
Vehicle Extrication Class
Certification Fees required by Certifying
Authority (EMT Instruction)
Emergency Response Team Class (Incl. Fire
extinguisher training)
Permit Required Confined Space Class
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Page 14
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Other Fire Prevention
F35 Flat $ 282
F36 Hourly $ 189
F37 Hourly $ 189
F38 Hourly $ 189
F39 Hourly $ 189
F40 Hourly $ 189
F41 Flat $ 376
F43
$ 282
$ 376
$ 565
$ 753
F45 Per System $ 376
F46 Flat $ 376
Operational Permits
F48
Flat (per permit) $ 62
F49 Flat $ 376
F50 Per Assembly $ 376
F51 Flat $ 376
F52 Per Building $ 376
F54 Flat $ 376
Energy Storage Systems
Combustible Fibers
Aerosol Products
Places of Assembly
Waste Handling
Pre‐inspection of Residential Care Facilities
Operational Permit for multiple occupancy permits (fee to be
charged for second and subsequent additional occupancy
permits for
inspections conducted on same site visit)
11‐30
31‐50
>50; each 50
Title 19, 5 Year Automatic Fire Sprinkler
Certification
Annual High‐rise Building (2 Hr. Minimum)
New Occupancy / Business
Group R, Division 1 Occupancies and Group R, Division 2
with 3 or More Dwelling Units Per
Building
3‐10
Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours (2
hour minimum)
Construction Re‐inspection Fees (1 hour minimum)
Inspection for Which a Fee is not Specifically
Indicated (1 hour minimum)
Annual Fire Inspection (Basic)
Non‐Construction Fire Re‐inspection Fee (1 hour minimum)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Page 15
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F55 Flat $ 376
F57 Per Facility $ 189
F58 Per Facility $ 565
F59 Flat $ 565
F60 Flat $ 565
F61 Per Building $ 565
F62 Per Tank $ 565
F63 Per Building [1] $ 753
F64
Per class of chemical at each
location
$ 376
F65 Per Location $ 753
F66 Per Location $ 376
F67 Per Location $ 376
F68 Flat $ 753
F69 Per Building $ 376
F70 Flat $ 376
F71 Per Location $ 376
F72 Flat $ 376
F73 Per Location $ 189
F74 Flat $ 376
F75 Flat $ 753
F76 Per Location $ 376
F77 Per System $ 189
F78 Per Location $ 376
F79 Flat $ 376
F80 Per Facility $ 376
F81 Flat $ 565Storage or Scrap Tires and Tire Byproducts
Residential Care and Residential Care for the
Elderly
Repair Garages and motor fuel‐dispensing facilities
Spraying or Dipping
Pyrotechnical Special Effects Materia
Radioactive Materials
Refrigeration Equipment
Organic Coatings
Ovens, Industrial Baking or Drying
Permit‐Required Confined Space
Liquefied Petroleum Gases
Magnesium
Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Stations
Child Care Center
Large Family Day Care
Lumberyards and woodworking plants
Hazardous Materials Storage, Transport on Site,
Dispense, Use, or Handle Chemicals
Hazardous Materials in Excess by Classifications; Store,
Transport on Site, Dispense, Use, or Handle Chemicals in
Excess of Amounts Listed in Table 105 ‐C
High‐piled Storage
Combusticle dust producing operations
Fire Alarm
Flammable of Combustible Liquids, Store, Handle,
or Use.
Compressed Gases
Cryogenic Fluids
Dry Cleaning
Fee Description
Misc. Combustible Storage
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Page 16
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F82 Flat $ 376
F83 Per Location $ 565
F84
F86
Per Tank $ 753
F87
Per Tank $ 753
Special Activity Permits
F89 Per Event $ 376
F90 Per Event $ 753
F91 Per Lot $ 753
F92 Flat $ 753
F93 Per Location $ 376
F95 Per Event $ 753
F96 Per
Occurrence $ 189
F98 Per Event $ 376
F99 Per Structure $ 376
F101 Varies [3] Two Times Permit Cost
Miscellaneous Fire
F102 [2,3] Actual Cost
F104 Per Request $ 282
F105 [2,3,4] Actual Cost
F106 [2,3] Actual Cost
F107 Hourly $ 189Investigations
Application for Use of Alternate Methods of
Protection
Emergency Response DUI Cost Recovery
Emergency Response Hazmat Cost Recovery
Hazard Mitigation Fee (Includes all other
incident types)
Parade Floats
Temporary Membrane Structures and Tents
Failure to Obtain a Special Activity Permit
Fire Hydrants and Valves
Fireworks Displays by a Licensed Professional
Fumigation and Insecticide Fogging
Carnivals and Fairs
Christmas Tree Lots
Explosives
Hazardous Materials; Install, Repair, Abandon, Remove,
Place‐Out‐of‐Service, Tanks or Piping,
Close or Substantially Modify a Storage Facility
Open Flames and Candles
Cutting and Welding
Blank
Flammable or Combustible Liquids; Remove, Install,
Construct, Alter or Abandon an
Underground or Above Ground Tank
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Wood Products
Page 17
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F108
Minimum base fee up to
$6,000 $ 95
base fee @ $6,000 $ 95
each add'l $1,000 $ 9.89
base fee @ $25,000 $ 189
each add'l $1,000 $ 15.06
base fee @ $50,000 $ 376
each add'l $1,000 $ 45.15
base fee @ $100,000 $ 3,009
each add'l $1,000 $ 11.29
base fee @ $500,000 $ 7,526
each add'l $1,000 $ 9.04
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 12,040
each add'l $1,000 $ 4.00
base fee @ $3,000,000 $ 20,068
each add'l $1,000 $ 6.02
base fee @ $5,000,000 $ 32,108
each add'l $1,000 $ 2.42
base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 44,147
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.07
base fee @ $25,000,000 $ 60,202
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.33
base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 68,228
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.37
F108.1 35% of
plan check fee
F109
Minimum base fee up to
$6,000 $ 189
base fee @ $6,000 $ 189
each add'l $1,000 $ 9.89
base fee @ $25,000 $ 376
each add'l $1,000 $ 3.76
base fee @ $50,000 $ 470
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.89
base fee @ $100,000 $ 565
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.41
base fee @ $500,000 $ 1,129
each add'l $1,000 $ 3.76
base fee @ $1,000,000 $ 3,009
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.00
base fee @ $3,000,000 $ 5,017
each add'l $1,000 $ 1.51
base fee @ $5,000,000 $ 8,026
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.60
base fee @ $10,000,000 $ 11,037
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.27
base fee @ $25,000,000 $ 15,050
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.07
base fee @ $50,000,000 $ 17,058
each add'l $1,000 $ 0.35
F109.1 35% of plan check
F111 Hourly $ 189
F112 [2] Actual CostFire Watch
Expedited Plan Check Fee
Additional Fire Plan Review (2 hr. minimum) Each
review beginning with 4th resubmittal.
$10,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$25,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$50,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$3,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$5,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Fire Protection Systems ‐ Plan Check (Includes 2
checks & 1 re ‐check)
$0 ‐ $6,000
$ 6,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Expedited Fire Life Safety Plan Check Fee
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 5,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 10,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 500,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 1,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 3,000,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 25,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 50,001
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
$ 100,001
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Fire and Life Safety ‐ Plan Check (Includes 2
checks and 1 re‐check)
$0 ‐ $6,000
$ 6,001
Page 18
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
F114
Flat [3]
$ 113
Flat [3]
$ 226
Flat [3]$ 567
F117
$0.06 per letter;
$0.82 per plan;
$0.06 per image
Miscellaneous
F124 Per Page [3]
Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
F126
Hourly $ 189
Hourly $ 476
Hourly $ 317
F127 Per Permit $ 29
F128 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost analysis
AMR/Kaiser Agreement; not included in cost
analysis; fee set per agreement
Class size ratio used is 1:6
Credit Card Transaction fees
For each location/building that contains 55 gallons
or more of a liquid, 500 pounds or more
The cost shall include the provision of scene
supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
Prevention:
Emergency Services:
Engine Company (3 person)
Ambulance (2 person)
Database Maintenance Fee
Reproduction of Printed Fire and Paramedic
Reports
Hourly Rate:
Preventable False Alarms
2nd alarm (Within 12 months of 1st alarm)
3rd alarm (Within 12 months of 1st alarm)
4th and other additional alarm. Site must have no alarms for
12 months since last occurrence to restart.
Plan Digitizing Fee
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description
Page 19
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Engineering Division
Plan Check / Inspection
and
ENG 10.01 Each User Fee $102.00
ENG 10.02 Each User Fee $66.00
ENG 10.03 Each User Fee $406.00
ENG 10.04 Each User Fee $334.00
ENG 10.05 Each User Fee $2,174.00
ENG 10.06 Each User Fee $534.00
ENG 10.07 Each User Fee $300.00
ENG 10.08 Each User Fee $233.00
ENG 10.09 Each User Fee $534.00
ENG 10.10 Each User Fee $10,000.00
Each User Fee $712.00
ENG 10.11
ENG 10.12 Each User Fee $300.00
ENG 10.13 Each User Fee $753.00
ENG 10.14 Each User Fee $200.00
ENG 10.15 Each User Fee $5.00
ENG 10.16 Per Day User Fee $102.00
ENG 10.17 Base User Fee $1,836.00
ENG 10.18 Base User Fee $1,836.00
ENG 10.19 Each $10,000 User Fee $772.60
ENG 10.20 Base User Fee $5,699.00
ENG 10.21 Each $10,000 User Fee $342.27
ENG 10.22 Base User Fee $10,833.00
ENG 10.23 Each $10,000 User Fee $296.84
ENG 10.24 Base User Fee $18,254.00
ENG 10.25 Each $10,000 User Fee $139.06
ENG 10.26 Base User Fee $25,207.00
ENG 10.27 Each $100,000 User Fee $387.00
ENG 10.28 Each User Fee $1,152.00
ENG 10.29 Base User Fee $612.00
ENG 10.30 Base User Fee $612.00
ENG 10.31 Each $5,000 User Fee $346.80
ENG 10.32 Base User Fee $4,080.00
ENG 10.33 Each $5,000 User Fee $136.03
ENG 10.34 Base User Fee $8,161.00
ENG 10.35 Each $5,000 User Fee $81.62
ENG 10.36 Base User Fee $12,242.00
ENG 10.37 Each $25,000 User Fee $204.00
ENG 10.38 Each User Fee $204.00
ENG 10.39 Each Penalty 2x Permit Fee
ENG 10.40 Per Meeting User Fee $ 183
ENG 10.41 Security Deposit SecDeposit $1,000.00
ENG 10.42 Security Deposit SecDeposit $2,000.00
ENG 10.43 Security Deposit SecDeposit $2,000.00
ENG 10.44 Security Deposit SecDeposit $2,000.00
ENG 10.45 Security Deposit SecDeposit $5,000.00
Utility Trenching
Cell Phone Tower Review (non‐City pole)
Utility Improvements
Utility / Outside Service Connection Review
Utility Access and TCP Only Review
Dig Once
Dig Once Advertisement
Revocable Encroachment Permits
Revocable Encroachment Plan Review
Revocable Encroachment & Maintenance Agreement
Revocable Encroachment Annual Renewal Fee
Miscellaneous
No Parking Signs
Sidewalk Closure for Maintenance or Construction ‐ per day
of sidewalk closure
Other Fees
Work without a permit (after the fact permit) Permit Fee +
Plan Check Fee
Engineering Staff Construction Coordination Committee (CCC)
Permit Work Deposit
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
$500,000+
$500,000+
Additional Inspections
Public Improvement Permit/Inspection (Cost of ROW
Improvements)
Up to $49,999
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$500,000 ‐ $999,999
$500,000 ‐ $999,999
$1,000,000+
Sewer Lateral Deposit
Minor Frontage Improvements
Pothole Projects
All other ROW Improvement Projects
$1,000,000+
4th and subsequent Plan Checks or revisions
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
Encroachment Permits
Public Improvement Plan Check ‐ (Cost of ROW
Improvements)
Up to $49,999
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ‐ ENGINEERING DIVISION
Fee Description
Sewer Improvements
Dig Once Policy Administration
Potholing
Potholding Permit
Sewer Lateral Video Review
Sewer Lateral Certificate
Sewer Lateral Plan Review and Permit
Minor Frontage Improvements
MFI Plan Review
Small Cell Towers
Cell Phone Tower Review (City owned pole)
Page 20
ENG 10.46 Each User Fee $969.00
ENG 10.47 Each User Fee $5,603.00
ENG 10.48 Each User Fee $2,549.00
ENG 10.49 Each User Fee $2,433.00
ENG 10.50 Each User Fee $1,934.00
ENG 10.51 Each User Fee $3,170.00
ENG 10.52 Each User Fee $702.00
ENG 10.53 Each User Fee $3,505.00
ENG 10.54 Each User Fee $5,818.00
ENG 10.55 Each User Fee $233.00
ENG 10.56 Each User Fee $2,877.00
ENG 10.57 Each User Fee $4,197.00
ENG 10.58 Each User Fee $58.00
ENG 10.59 Each 21 CCR 1411.3 $16.00
ENG 10.60 Annually 21 CCR 1411.3 $90.00
ENG 10.61 Each User Fee $237.00
ENG 10.62 Security Deposit SecDeposit $2,000.00
ENG 10.63 Base User Fee $3,826.00
ENG 10.64 Base User Fee $3,826.00
ENG 10.65 Each 10,000 c.y. User Fee $527.00
ENG 10.66 Base User Fee $5,934.00
ENG 10.67 Each 10,000 c.y. User Fee $234.00
ENG 10.68 Base User Fee $7,104.00
ENG 10.69 Each 10,000 c.y. User Fee $351.00
ENG 10.70 Each User Fee $936.00
ENG 10.71 Security Deposit SecDeposit $50,000.00
ENG 10.72 Base User Fee $204.00
ENG 10.73 Each 250 c.y. User Fee $17.00
ENG 10.74 Per Hour User Fee $241.00
ENG 10.75 Per Hour User Fee $204.00
ENG 10.76 Per Hour User Fee $204.00
ENG 10.77 Each User Fee $66.00
ENG 10.78 Each User Fee $66.00
ENG 10.79 Per Hour User Fee $233.00
ENG 10.80 Per Meeting User Fee $183.00
ENG 10.81 Per Review User Fee $702.00
ENG 10.82 Each User Fee $702.00
ENG 10.83 Each User Fee $1,873.00
ENG 10.84 Each User Fee $2,341.00
ENG 10.85 Each User Fee $3,044.00
ENG 10.86 Each User Fee $585.00
ENG 10.87 Base User Fee $836.00
ENG 10.88 Base User Fee $836.00
ENG 10.89 Each $10,000 User Fee $562.00
ENG 10.90 Base User Fee $3,646.00
ENG 10.91 Each $10,000 User Fee $187.33
ENG 10.92 Base User Fee $6,456.00
ENG 10.93 Each $10,000 User Fee $177.92
ENG 10.94 Base User Fee $10,904.00
ENG 10.95 Each $10,000 User Fee $112.40
ENG 10.96 Base User Fee $16,524.00
ENG 10.97 Each $100,000 User Fee $351.00
ENG 10.98 Each User Fee $936.00
Planning Support
Engineering Staffing TAGs
Geotechnical Peer Review
$1,000,000+
$1,000,000+
4th and subsequent Plan Checks or revisions
Engineering Design and Conditions Review
Single Family Res / new or additions
Multi‐Family Res / new or modifications
Commercial / Industrial
Projects requiring City Council Approval
3rd and subsequent resubmittals
Building Support
Engineering Site Review (Cost of Site Improvements)
Up to $49,999
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$50,000 ‐ $99,999
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$100,000 ‐ $249,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
$250,000 ‐ $499,999
$500,000 ‐ $999,999
$500,000 ‐ $999,999
Outside Sewer Service Agreement
Benchmark Maintenance Fee
Mapping
Lot Conformance / Certificate of Compliance
Grant of Easement / Easement Abandonment Request
Subsequent Engineering Mapping Reviews
Engineering Agreements
Map Extensions
Final / Parcel Map Review and Processing
Property Merger / Notice
Lot Line Adjustment / Certificate of Compliance
Subdivision Tentative Map
100,000 + Cubic Yards
100,000 + Cubic Yards
Major Tentative Map
Each Additional Lot Over 5
Grading Permit Deposit
Erosion Control Compliance
Base
Per 250 cubic yards (round to the nearest 250)
Miscellaneous
Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours
Re‐inspection Assessed Under Provisions of Section 305(h)
Inspections for which a fee is not specifically indicated
Permit reinstatement fee
Research for Non‐Permit Application Inquires
Engineering Staff Time for Services not Specifically Indicated
Transportation ‐ Annual or repetitive permit
Transportation ‐ Single trip, or a modification of on original
Grading
Hauling Permit
Hauling Permit Fee
Hauling Permit Deposit
Grading Plan Check and Permit
51 ‐ 9,999 Cubic Yards
10,000 ‐ 49,999 Cubic Yards
10,000 ‐ 49,999 Cubic Yards
50,000 ‐ 99,999 Cubic Yards
50,000 ‐ 99,999 Cubic Yards
Transportation
Minor Tentative Map
4th and subsequent Plan Checks or Revisions
Page 21
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Pretreatment Fee
PW28
Every 3 years [4] $ 652
Every 3 years $ 163
PW29 Per Hour
PW31 Per Hour $ 163
PW32 Per Hour
PW33 Per Hour $ 163
PW34 Per Hour $ 163
PW35
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
Per Test [5] Actual Cost
[5] Actual Cost
PW36 1% of Plan Check
Fee
$ 163
PW37 Flat $ 376
PW38 Flat $ 29
PW39 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Placeholder for Master Fee Schedule (MFS); not
included in cost analysis
Transportation Permits are required for all over ‐
sized loads per CVC 35780. Fees are the max based CVC
35795 and Caltrans Fees
Includes support costs from Planning
Hourly salary, plus 40% in benefits and another
30% in administrative costs; 1/2 hour minimum
Hourly salary, plus 50% overtime rate, plus 50%
for benefits on base rate, plus 12% in administrative
charges.
Hourly salary, plus 50% for benefits on base rate,
plus 12% in administrative charges. One half ‐hour
minimum.
Defined in federal regulations and municipal
ordinance.
Public Works ‐ Engineering
Administrative Code Enforcement Fee (for failure to correct
violations after receiving Courtesy Notice from Fire
Prevention Division 14 day grace
period to correct)
Database Maintenance Fee
Credit Card Transaction fees
Waste Management Plan Review
Hourly Rate:
PAH
Phenol
Ammonia
Conductivity
Oxygen Uptake Rate
Others
Oil & Grease
Metals (except Hg)
Hg
pH
Bioassay
CN
Special Sampling/Equipment Use
Wastewater Analysis
BOD
COD
TSS
Inspections ‐ Outside of Normal Pretreatment
Activities
Inspections ‐ Outside of Normal Business Hours
Special Monitoring Activites for Enforcement
and Surveillance
Permits and Renewals: (valid for 3 year time
intervals)
Significant Industrial Users
All Other Required Businesses
Water Quality Compliance Review
Fee Description
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ‐ WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION
Page 22
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Parking meters and lots
operate Monday through
Saturday, times noted on
meters and signage
Minimum purchase with Minimum Hourly Rate
Maximum Hourly
Rate
Set Hourly Rate
approved by Parking
Place Commission
Grand Avenue , Cypress to
Walnut $0.50 $3.00 $1.25
Grand Avenue, Walnut to
Spruce $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Grand Avenue, Airport to
Cypress $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Maple Avenue (200 and
300 blocks)$0.50 $3.00 $1.25
Linden Avenue (200 and
300 blocks)$0.50 $3.00 $1.25
Cypress Avenue (200 and
300 blocks)$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Baden Avenue (300 block)$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Spruce Avenue, Baden to
Grand $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Miller Avenue, Linden to
Maple $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Miller Avenue, Airport to
Linden,$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Airport Boulevard $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Cypress Avenue (400 and
500 blocks),$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Linden Avenue (100 and
400 blocks)$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Lux Avenue $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Walnut Avenue $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
24 minute spaces $0.10 per
3 minutes
Metered Spaces in
Parking Lot Numbers:
Minimum Rate Maximum Rate
Set Hourly Rate
approved by Parking
Place Commission
#1 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#4 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#5 (west)$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#12 (east)$0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#15 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#16 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#17 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
#18 $0.50 $3.00 $1.00
Permit Rates (Lots 1, 4,
5, 7, 12, 14, 17,
18)Minimum Rate Maximum Rate
Set Hourly Rate
approved by Parking
Place Commission
Monthly Permit $40.00 $100.00
Quarterly Permit $120.00 $400.00
Miller Avenue Parking
Spaces $0.50 per hour $3.00 per hour
Monthly Permit $20.00 $80.00
Quarterly Permit $90.00 $240.00
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, unlimited,
9 am to 6 pm
Time Limits subject to change per Parking Place Commission
Per hour, up to five hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, unlimited,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, unlimited,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, unlimited,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to ten hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Time Limits subject to change per Parking Place Commission
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to ten hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Time Limits subject to change per Parking Place Commission
Per hour, up to two hours ,
9 am to 8 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 8 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 8 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 8 pm
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ‐ PARKING METER AND PARKING PERMIT
Fee Description
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Per hour, up to two hours,
9 am to 6 pm
Page 23
Fee No.Fee Unit Notes 22/23 rate (Proposed)
Damaged and Missing
L1 [3]Actual Cost of
each item
L3 Per Case $ 2.00
[3]Actual Cost of
each item
[3]Prorated Cost of
set
L7 [3]Actual Cost of
each item
L8 [3]Actual Cost of
each item
L16 [3]Actual Cost of
each item
L18
Each [4] $ 5.00
Each [4] $ 2.00
Miscellaneous Charges
L20 Per
Transaction [3]
$0.49 per transaction
plus 3.49% of
transaction amount
L21
Per Sheet [3] $ 0.15
Per Sheet [3] $ 0.50
L22 Each [3] $ 5.00
L23
Refer to City Clerk Fee
Schedule
L24 Per Item $ 16.80
L25
Each [3] $ 0.50
Each [3] $ 1.00
L26 Each [3] $ 0.25
L27 Per Page [3] $ 0.20
L28
[3]
Price set by United
States Postal
Service
L29
Flat [3] $ 3.00
Flat [3] $ 5.00
L30
L33 Flat [1,3] Actual Cost
L34 Flat [2,3] Actual Cost
$ 122.85
$ 25.20
L35 Per Transaction 2.2% of the amount
[Notes]
[1]
[2]
[3] Placehold
er for
[4] Fee set by
$4‐$10 depending upon unit cost
$10‐$40 depending upon cost of transportation,
admission, etc.
Field Trip Fee
Hourly Rate
Full‐time
Part‐time
Credit Card Transaction fees
non‐residents
Returned Check, Insufficient Funds
USB Drives
Postcard, ID
Reserve: Out of County Reserve /
Inter‐Library Loan
SSF residents
Color
Microfilm Copies
Photocopy
Copy of CD/DVD (see City Clerk
fee schedule)
History Room Photographs Print Copies
Postcards ‐ SSF, 3.5" x 5"
Black and White
Black & White
Color
History Book ‐ SSF
History Room Photographs ‐ Digital Copies
Generic Materials
Paypal Convenience Fee
Computer Printouts
Lost, Replacement Charges ‐ Magazines ‐ See
Processing Fee Below
Lost, Replacement Charges ‐ Processing Fee
(Peninsula Library Automated Network Policy) Applies to all
Materials:
Catalogued Materials
Missing Book, DVD, etc. from Set
Missing CD ‐ from Audio Book Vendors that
offer Replacement
Books
Equipment
Fee Description
AV Materials (contents or item damage)
CD/DVD Cases, Replacement of
Lost or Damaged
LIBRARY
Page 24
Child Care Programs Resident Non‐Resident
Traditional Summer Camp $194 $ 226
Spring Camp $39 $ 44
Winter Camp $39 $ 44
Full of Fun Camp $222 n/a
Child Care Programs
Speciality Camps
(Enrichment and Sports
$238 $ 271
5 Days / With Before
School Care
$462
5 Days / After School Care
Only
$399
3 Days / With Before
School Care
$315
3 Days / After Care Only $273
2 Days / With Before
School Care
$210
2 Days / With After Care
Only
$184
$147
Sibling Discount: Applies
Only to Full‐ Time
Before/After School,
Pre‐School. Children must
be enrolled in the same
program.
15%
Pre‐School Child Care Resident Non‐Resident
5 Days/ Full Day $698 $ 781
5 Days/ Half Day $617 $ 688
3 Days/ Full Day $433 $ 483
3 Days/ Half Day $382 $ 425
2 Days/ Full Day $299 $ 336
2 Days/ Half Day $265 $ 294
Late Pick‐up:
All Child Care Programs
(for each minute
after closing time)
$6.83 $ 6.83
Processing Fee / New
Enrollment
For Pre‐School and
After‐School
Recreation Programs
$71 $ 71
Waiting List Fee $34 $ 34
Document Retrieval Fee $34 $ 34
Per application
Add: Late Payment Fee: $30.60 Per Occurrence.
Retrieval of documented information,
i.e. tax, custodial
Per application
NOTE: “Big Lift” grant funded preschool fees assessed on a sliding scale, not to exceed $630/month (resident) or $704/month (non ‐resident) as per
HUD 80% Area Median Income.
Per month
Per month
Per month
Per month
Per month
Per month
Per month
Per month
For 2 or more children enrolled.
NOTE: No fees assessed for ASES grant funded After School Programs
Before and After School Recreation Programs
Per month
Per month
Per day
Per week
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Per week
Per week
Per day
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Per month
Per month
Enrichment and Sports Camps core programs are 10 am to 4 pm.
Fees include before and after camp care, available from 7:30 am to 10 am, and 4 pm to 6
pm.
Before School Care Only – 5 Days
Page 25
Aquatic Admissions Resident Non‐Resident
Adult Admission $6.50 $6.50
Adult 10‐Punch Pass $38.59 $ 61.43
Adult 10‐Punch Pass
(Senior)
$25.99 $ 37.80
Child Admission $ 5.25 $ 5.25
Child 10‐Punch Pass $25.73 $ 50.40
Family Swim (1 to 5
swimmers)
$7.50 $7.50
Additional Swimmer(s)$2.75 $2.75
Adult Monthly Pass $57.23 $65.10
Adult Monthly Pass
(Senior)
$46.75 $53.50
Adult 3‐Month Pass $162.00 $185.00
Adult 3‐Month Pass
(Senior)
$132.75 $152.25
Aquatic Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Resident Class Fees Add $4.20 per session
Infant Water Orientation $14.44 Add $4.20 per session
Baby/Aqua Tots $14.44 Add $4.20 per session
Child Lessons (Group)$14.4‐16.8 Add $4.20 per session
Adult Lessons (Group)$14.44 Add $4.20 per session
Semi‐Private & Private
Lessons
Semi‐Private (Child or
Adult)
$22.05 Add $4.20 per session
Private (Child or Adult)$42.00 Add $4.20 per session
Adult Fitness $6.30 Add $15.75
per session
Adult Aquatic Exercise $6.30 Add $15.75
per session
Aqua Zumba $6.30 Add $15.75
per session
Lifeguard Training:
*Includes Book &
Materials
$221.55 $238.35
Red Cross Lifeguard
Certification Fee
$41.00 $41.00
Junior Lifeguard Camp $116.55 $ 132.30
Swim Team $6195.00
Pool Rental Resident Non‐Resident
Participants 0 to 30 $189.00 $ 210.00
Participants 31 to 60 $213.15 $ 234.15
Participants 61 to
100
$237.30 $ 258.30
Locker Rental
Small Lockers $0.26 $0.26
Large Lockers $0.53 $0.53
Per Day
Per Day
Annual
Per 1 ½ Hour
Per 1 ½ Hour
Per 1 ½ Hour
Per Session
Per Hour
Per Hour
10 Admissions
Per Admission
10 Admissions
Per Admission
10 Admissions
Per Session
Per Session
Per 1 week session (5 hours per day)
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Family Admission
Per Admission
Per Session
Per Session
Per Session
Per Session
Page 26
Picnic Fees Resident Non‐Resident
Application Processing $38.85 $ 38.85
Orange Park
Eucalyptus Shelter (15
Tables‐10:00 am
– 6 pm
$344.40 $ 360.15
Area #2 (2 tables)$37.80 $ 54.60
Area #3 (3 tables)$54.60 $ 70.35
Area #4 (4 tables)$72.45 $ 88.20
Area #5 (5 tables)$92.40 $ 108.15
Refundable Deposit –
covers clean‐up,
repair, and/or overtime
costs
$200.00 $ 200.00
Extended Hours $55.65 $ 55.65
Alta Loma
Area #1 (6 tables)$111.30 $ 127.05
Area #2 (2 tables)$37.80 $ 53.55
Area #3 (2 tables)$37.80 $ 53.55
Avalon Park (5 small
tables)
$67.20 $ 82.95
Buri Buri Park
I (6 tables)$109.20 $ 124.95
II (2 tables)$36.75 $ 52.50
III (3 tables)$54.60 $ 70.35
IV (3 tables)$54.60 $ 70.35
Sellick Park
7 tables, includes Camp
Fire area
$92.40 $ 108.15
Westborough Park
Sheltered Area (18 tables) $366.45 $ 382.20
Area 2 (5 tables)$132.30 $ 148.05
Combined Sheltered Area
& Area 2 (23 ta
$483.00 $ 498.75
Additional Gas Grill $111.30 $ 111.30
Damage Deposit
(Refundable)
$200.00 $ 200.00
Extended Hours $55.65 $ 55.65
Sports Programs and
Facilities
Resident Non‐Resident
Category I: Up to 99
Members
$117.60 n/a
Category II: 100 – 199
Members
$176.40 n/a
Category III: 200 – 299
Members
$288.75 n/a
Category IV: 300 and Up $406.35 n/a
Adult Softball League $94.50 n/a
Non‐Resident Surcharge $15.75
Adult Basketball $107.10
Non‐Resident Surcharge $15.75
Forfeit Fee $52.50
Field Lights $35.70 $38.85
Field Preparation
General $ 34.65 $ 56.70
Affiliated League $ 30.45 $ 53.55
Open Gym Basketball &
Futsal
Adult $ 4.20 $ 4.20
Junior $ 3.15 $ 3.15
Terrabay Fitness Room $ 2.63 $ 2.63
Open Gym Script Card
Adults $ 36.75 $ 36.75
Juniors $ 21.00 $ 21.00For 10 Punches
Per Hour
Per preparation
Per preparation
Per game
Per game
Per game
Per game
Per admission
Per admission
Per admission
For 10 Punches
Per day
Per day
Annual Renewal Fees to Co‐sponsored Groups that Use our Fields /F acilities:
Annual fees
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per day
Per hour
Per permit, added to each rental
Per day, 8 hours
Page 27
$ 33.60
Drop‐in Badminton Resident Non‐Resident
Adult $6.30 $ 6.30
Junior $4.20 $ 4.20
Field Reservations $29.40 $37.80
Field Permit Fee $28.35
Bocce Ball Permit Fee
Assessed to private
events not co‐sponsored
by the city
$87.15
Children ‐‐ Co‐Sponsored
League. There is no
charge to co‐sponsored
groups for
field reservations or
preparation
After‐School Sports
Program
Playground Sports Clinic $60.90 $ 66.15
Playground Sports
Program
$66.15 $ 71.40
Middle School Sports Resident Non‐Resident
Cheerleading $79.00
Football, Volleyball,
Basketball, Badminto
$79.00
Track & Field/Lacrosse $79.00
Facility Fees Resident Non‐Resident
Magnolia Center $197.40 $ 213.15
Rent Out Commercial
Kitchen Space for
Caterers and Small
Producers
$87.15
Meeting Room Rental
Municipal Services
Building
Resident Non‐Resident
Social Hall w/Kitchen and
One‐hour
Use of Atrium
$215.25 $ 231.00
Non‐Profit Groups $199.50
Atrium Kitchen (As add‐on
to Social Ha
$88.20 $ 102.90
Non‐Profit Groups $72.45
Social Hall $215.25 $ 231.00
Per Hour; 6 ‐Hour Minimum
Per hour
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Fees for the use of the Community Room, Betty Weber Room, and the Multi ‐Use and Activity Rooms in the Westborough Park Building apply to
business meetings and seminars only.
Non‐resident rates are an additional $15 per hour
Per hour
Per Hour Monday‐Friday during the day
Per hour
Per Permit
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Gymnasium Rental (School District gymnasium –additional fee is payable to SSFUSD)
Per hour
Per admission
Per admission
Per 1‐Hour Rental
Per 6‐Hour Session
Per League
Per session
Per Session for each sport or activity
Per Permit
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Page 28
Facility Fees Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Profit Groups $199.50
Atrium/Marie Peterson
Room w/Kitch
$138.60 $ 154.35
Non‐Profit Groups $122.85
Atrium w/Kitchen $127.05 $ 142.80
Non‐Profit Groups $111.30
Marie Peterson Room
w/Kitchen
$111.30 $ 127.05
Non‐Profit Groups $95.55
Marie Peterson Room w/o
Kitchen
$99.75 $ 115.50
Non‐Profit Groups $84.00
Betty Weber Room &
Butterfly Room
$88.20 $ 103.95
Non‐Profit Groups $72.45
Community Room w/o
Kitchen, No Foo
$121.80 $ 137.55
Non‐Profit Groups $106.05
William M. Belloni Family
Room
$89.25 $ 105.00
Non‐Profit Groups $73.50
Co‐Sponsored Groups $55.65
Special Use Rentals $89.25
Extra Rental Fees
Portable Bar $64.05
Coffee Pot $5.25
Sound System $80.85
Flip Chart with
Paper/Markers
$12.60
LCD Projector $53.55
Event Day Room Setup
Adjustment
$80.85
LCD Displays $21.53
Portable Stage $107.10
Projection Screens $5.25
Duplicate Permit Fee
Retrieval Cost
$26.78
City Holiday Rental
Surcharge
$33.08
Resident Non‐Resident
Multi‐Use/Activity Rooms
w/Kitchen
$162.75 $ 179
Non‐Profit Groups $147.00
Resident Non‐Resident
Open Space $50.00 $ 65
Non‐Profit Groups $50.00
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Per hour
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Per hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour (Added to hourly rental rate on City
holidays)
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Use
One Time
Per Use
One Time
Per Day/No Charge with Use of Projector
Per Copy
Per Use, added to facility rental fee
Per Use, added to facility rental fee
Per Use, added to facility rental fee
Per Use
Per Hour
Per Hour
Per Hour; 1 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 1 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Breezeway Open Space Rental
Westborough Park Building
Page 29
Facility Fees Resident Non‐Resident
Multi‐Use Room
w/Kitchen
$151.20 $ 167
Non‐Profit Groups $135.45
Activity Room w/Kitchen $128.10 $ 144
Non‐Profit Groups $112.35
Joseph A. Fernekes
Building
Resident Non‐Resident
Multi Use Activity Room
w/Kitchen
$204.75 $ 220.50
Non‐Profit Groups $189.00
Extra Fees
Outside Gas Grill $107.10 $ 107.10
Resident Non‐Resident
Iris Room 1 and 2
w/Kitchen,
Gym and Poppy Room
$185.85 $ 201.60
Non‐Profit Groups $170.10
Iris Room 1 and 2
w/Kitchen and
Poppy Room
$128.10 $ 143.85
Non‐Profit Groups $112.35
Iris Room 1 and 2
w/Kitchen and Gym
$138.60 $ 154.35
Non‐Profit Groups $122.85
Iris Room 1 & 2 w/Kitchen $99.75 $ 115.50
Non‐Profit Groups $84.00
Gymnasium $111.30 $ 127.05
Non‐Profit Groups $95.55
Iris Room 1 and 2 w/o
Kitchen*
$89.25 $ 105.00
Non‐Profit Groups $73.50
Poppy Room w/o Kitchen* $89.25 $ 105.00
Non‐Profit Groups $73.50
Iris Room 1 with Kitchen $84.00 $ 99.75
Non‐Profit Groups $68.25
Iris Room 1 w/o Kitchen*$77.70 $ 93.45
Non‐Profit Groups $61.95
Iris Room 2 with Kitchen $84.00 $ 99.75
Non‐Profit Groups $68.25
Iris Room 2 w/o Kitchen*$77.70 $ 93.45
Non‐Profit Groups $61.95
Resident Non‐Resident
MSB Atrium and A/B $300.00
MSB Social Hall $300.00
Westborough Building $300.00
Terrabay Recreation
Center
$300.00Per Rental
Reservation Deposit (deducted from total rental fee)
Per Rental
Per Rental
Per Rental
Per Hour, 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 3 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 2 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour, 2 ‐ Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 3 ‐Hour Minimum.
Per Hour; 3 ‐Hour Minimum
Per day
Terrabay Recreation Center* Rates are for business meetings/seminars only
Per Hour; 3 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 3 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum.
Per Hour; 4 ‐Hour Minimum
Per Hour; 5 ‐hour Minimum
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Per Hour; 5 ‐Hour Minimum
Page 30
Facility Fees Resident Non‐Resident
Joseph Fernekes Building $300.00
Resident Non‐Resident
MSB Atrium & A/B $350.00
MSB Social Hall $500.00
Westborough Building $350.00
Terrabay Recreation
Center
$350.00
Joseph Fernekes Building $350.00
High Risk Event $500.00
Insurance (Subject to
change from insurance
company year to year)
Per Event, depending on
the facility and
size of group.
Group Set‐up Charges Per
Hour
$84.00 $84.00
Application Processing Fee $89.25
Alcohol Surcharge:
Champagne $32.55
Champagne & Wine $58.80
Champagne/Wine/Beer $85.05
Champagne/Wine/Beer/M
ixed Drinks
$111.30
Refunds
Pre‐School Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Resident Class Fees Add $15.75
Class Supplies Fee $0‐$87.00
Animal Adventures $4.69
Art Adventures with
Parent & Me
$5.37
Claymagic $5.37
Cooking $6.00
Creative Dance $5.67
Fantastic Family Fun $4.58
Foreign Language $6.55
Kinder Tot $5.49
Kindergarten Readiness $6.17
Mom’s Gym $8.20
Move with Music $5.67
Pre‐Ballet $7.96
Pre‐Gymnastic $6.29
Pre‐Karate $6.42
Pre‐Karate (2x/week $4.53
Sliding scale based on direct cost of class supplies.
With 60 days advance notice of cancellation, 50% of the deposit will be returned if the date can be resold. With 60 days or
less advance
All fees are on an hourly basis, unless noted otherwise.
Per Session
Per Hour
Non‐refundable
Per Rental
Per Rental
Per Rental
Per Rental
*$150.00 to $300.00
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Per Rental
Damage/Overtime/Clean‐up Deposit (refundable if no violation)
Per Rental
Per Rental
Page 31
Pre‐School Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Pre‐School Fun $6.05
Science Exploration $6.11
Soccer Tots $6.48
Storytime Adventures $4.77
Terrific 3’s $4.77
Toddlergarten $3.47
Tot Tapper $6.28
Tumbling $6.28
Children's Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Resident Class Fees Add $15.75
Art Adventures $9.06
Ballet $7.96
Ballet Combo Class (3
days per week)
$6.37
Cheerleading $4.88
Computers $12.60
Cooking $6.30
Creative Movement &
Dance
$5.37
Drama $5.37
Eskrima $6.05
Exercise for Kids $5.71
Fencing $10.06
Gymnastics $6.66
Irish Step Dancing $6.35
Karate (2x/week)$3.76
Keiki Hawaiian Dance $6.30
Kenpo Eskrima $4.88
Knitting for Kids $6.30
Math Fun $6.55
Mexican Folk Dance $25.17
Mindful Meditation $5.21
Painting & Drawing $8.83
Rhythmic Gymnastics $5.92
Summer Mini Camps (1/2
Day)
$10.86
Tap Dance $6.30
Tap Dance, Semi‐private $9.88
Watercolor $8.83
Writing Workshop $5.07
Per session
All fees are on an hourly basis, unless noted otherwise.
Per Session
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Page 32
Adult Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Resident Class Fees,
Add
Add $15.75
Ballet $7.96
Ballet Combo Class (3
days per week)
$6.37
Ballroom Dance (Tango,
Salsa & Swing)
$7.90
Belly Dancing $6.91
Cake Decorating $3.96
Ceramics $7.96
Classroom Lecture $5.40
Color Analysis $5.67
Computers $7.58
Cooking $12.76
Country Dance $7.96
Dog Training $16.31
Drawing for Teens $8.83
Dying for Crafters $3.90
Eskrima $4.88
Exercise $5.60
Exercise Drop‐In $3.15‐15.75
Fencing $10.06
Flower Design $4.69
Foreign Language $7.58
Garden Workshop $4.69
Ikebana $4.40
Jewelry $5.01
Karate (1x week)$5.88
Karate (2x week)$4.84
Kickboxing $5.24
Knitting $4.69
Line Dancing $4.44
Mexican Folk
Dance/Advanced
$5.37
Mindful Meditation $5.75
Painting $8.83
Polynesian Dance $6.55
Quilting $4.44
Sewing $6.55
Step Aerobics $5.87
Stretch & Tone $5.87
Tai Chi Chuan $5.92
Tap Dance $6.60
Water Colors $8.83
Yoga $6.60
Music Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Guitar, Private $17.65
Guitar, Group $8.20
Mariachi Music $5.72
Piano, Private $40.29
Clarinet/Saxophone,
Private
$40.29
Ukulele, Group $8.20
Voice, Group $6.11
Voice, Private $10.06
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
All fees are on an hourly basis, unless noted otherwise.
Per Session
Page 33
Tennis Classes Resident Non‐Resident
Non‐Resident Class Fees,Add $15.75
Private Lesson $41.61
Semi‐Private Lessons $30.32
Pee Wee Tennis $7.57
Juniors Team Tennis $10.57
Other Services Resident Non‐Resident
Contractual Classes
Service Fee
$5.25 ‐$27.3
Registration Processing
Fee
$ 2.36
Community Garden Plot $ 111.30
Artist Studio Fee $ 0.55
Adult Day Care Sliding Fee
based on ability to pay
$48‐$64
Special Event & Recital
Tickets
$5.25‐$13
Senior Meal ‐ Senior
Center
Senior Meal ‐ Senior
Center
$ 6.30
Senior Transportation
Donation (Sugges
$ 3.68
Seniors Program Field Trip
Fee (Out of T
$ 6.83
Drop‐in Senior Class Fee $5.25‐$10.5
Donate ‐ A ‐ Tree $ 221.55
Residential Street Tree
Maintenance
$ 110.25
Thanksgiving Fun Run:
Under 12 years old Free
Children 13‐17 years old $ 6.30
18 and older $22.05
18 and older $32.55
Halloween Haunted House $ 6.30
Refundable Tree Planting
Deposit
$ 350.00
Protected Tree Permit $ 112.35
Wholesale Tree Purchase
Pass‐Through
$0‐$525
Children’s Classes Late
Pick‐up Fee
$6.30
Special Event Support
Staff
$32.55
Mail Notices $0.84
Credit Card Transaction
fees
2.2% of the amount 2.2% of the amountPer Transaction
Per Tree
Per Tree
Per Tree
Per Minute
Per hour/per staff person
Per Parcel
Registration
Registration
Pre‐Registration
Day of Event Registration
Per Admission
Per Meal
Per Ride (each way)
Per Ride (each way), in addition to cost
of fare
Per Tree
Per Tree
Annually
Per Sq. Ft.
*$ 45.00 ‐ $60.00
Per person, per hour
Per Hour
Sliding Scale based on program cost
Per Session
Per person, per hour
Page 34
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
Report regarding Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)at Orange Memorial Park;the Sports Field Project and
Aquatic Center Project,Bridges Replacement Project and Playground Replacement with recommended bond
funding strategies. (Jacob Gilchrist, Director Capital Project, and Jason Wong, Acting Finance Director)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council Budget Standing Committee consider and provide direction regarding bond funding for
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)projects at Orange Memorial Park.Projects include construction of a synthetic turf multi-use
sports field,which has previously been approved as a CIP project and is starting construction in May 2022,replacement of Orange
Pool with a New Aquatic Center for which conceptual design is underway,replacement of pedestrian bridges at Colma Creek and
replacement of the existing playground with an all-abilities playground.
BACKGROUND
The projects at Orange Memorial Park which are the subject of this Study Session -a synthetic turf sports field,a new aquatic
center,replacement of pedestrian bridges at Colma Creek and replacement of the playground -are being considered together in this
report with funding to come from a 2022 bond sale.
This report and presentation will discuss each project, including the following:
-Status of the Sports Field project;
-Budget update for the New Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center;
-Need for replacement of the Orange Memorial Park pedestrian bridges spanning Colma Creek and proposed budget;
-Need for replacement of the main playground with an all-abilities playground and proposed budget;
-Updated estimated project costs and cash flow needs over the anticipated design/construction time frames;
-Forecast of anticipated Parks Impact Fees, which have traditionally been the primary funding source for park projects; and
-Recommended combined bond funding for these projects.
Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project
The Sports Field project will conserve water,provide for year-round play,significantly expand the number of hours of play that can
be scheduled,improve safety for players,and enhance the appearance and beauty of Orange Memorial Park.The project was
approved in the FY 2018/19 Capital Improvement Program and includes:one adult /full size baseball field,one softball field,and
two youth baseball fields;one adult soccer field,two junior soccer fields,and four youth soccer fields.Amenities include synthetic
turf,lighting and electronic scoreboards,30-foot chain link backstops with netting,aluminum bleachers,a restroom/concession
building, bullpens, dugouts, batting cages, portable goals and fencing, and landscape enhancements.
In November 2021,the project was advertised for construction based on an engineering estimate of $11,725,000.The lowest
qualified bid came in at $10,515,000,which included all five bid alternates.The construction contract was awarded to Interstate
Grading and Paving in February 2022.Preconstruction efforts are underway with onsite construction scheduled to start in May 2022,
following completion of the Storm Water Capture project.Based on this schedule,staff expects the sports fields to open in summer
2023. The project continues to track towards a total project budget of $14 million.
New Aquatic Center
Orange Pool is South San Francisco’s only indoor municipal swimming pool.Opened in 1970,it continues to serve as a community-
wide destination for residents of all ages.Despite the City’s attentive custodianship of the building,overall,the building’s age and
heavy use have resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior. The facility is well beyond the point of meriting replacement.
In April 2021 staff presented to the Budget Standing Committee the Wong and Logan Feasibility Study with recommendation of the
construction of a new two-pool facility.In May 2021 staff engaged Group4 Architects from the City’s on-call architecture firm list to
explore alternative Aquatic Center locations within Orange Park and validate construction costs.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 1 of 6
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
Working from the two-pool facility approach identified in the Wong and Logan study,Group4 refined the program to include an 8-
lane/25-meter pool,separate teaching pool,swimmer’s lounge,rentable multi-use/party room,staff and pool director offices,locker
rooms and support spaces for mechanical equipment within a 28,500 SF single-story facility.
Since the October 2021 presentation to Council,the construction industry has experienced historic cost escalation primarily due to the
lingering impacts of the global pandemic and the war in Ukraine.Costs for everything from construction materials to furnishings are
impacted by supply chain disruptions and increasing fuel costs.While the project budget in October 2021 was $34 million,the current
budget is projected to be $49 million.This cost reflects broad industry projections of 15%annual cost increases from late 2021
through 2024.With such market volatility,it is possible that costs will be significantly lower by the time the project goes out to bid in
early 2023.As Council may recall,this was the case with the Library |Parks and Recreation facility.Given the current project scope
and market,staff believes the $49 million is very conservative and will allow us to adhere to the project schedule regardless of
anticipated market conditions.
Community engagement for the Aquatic Center kicked-off early April 2022,with Workshop #1 a Gallery Walk.Workshop #2 is
scheduled for Saturday,April 30th where community members will have the opportunity to provide input on design alternatives.The
project continues to track to the following schedule:
Design April-December 2022
Bid January - March 2023
Construction April 2023 - September 2024
Close-Out October - December 2024
Orange Memorial Park Bridges
There are currently two pedestrian bridges that span Colma Creek,connecting the northern and southern halves
of Orange Memorial Park.A third bridge once existed to the northwest,connecting the former Mazzanti
properties.The existing bridges are estimated to be 50 years old and are in disrepair and uncompliant with
current ADA standards.Wide gaps in the bridge decking also presents hazards for cyclists and wheelchair users,
where wheels can get wedged in the openings between slats.Over the years,temporary plywood sheets have
been installed over the decking to cover large gaps and mitigate these conditions.Due to their steep slopes,
currently,the only accessible path of travel requires those with mobility disabilities to travel to the at-grade
crossing on the sidewalk on Orange Avenue.
Staff recommends replacement of both pedestrian bridges.With a total project cost of $3 million,$1.5 million
would come from bond funds and the remaining $1.5 million from Park Impact fees.The new bridges are
projected to be operational in 2024.
Orange Memorial Park Playground
The existing playground,which serves children ages 2-5 and 5-12 years old was installed in 2012.The
playground is heavily used throughout the year by the general public,and Parks and Recreation programs,such
as summer camp.The typical lifespan for a playground is 10-15 years,depending on environmental conditions
and use.Due to the high volume of use year-round,this playground is now due for replacement.Platforms,
slides and other play elements are worn,and in need of constant maintenance.Metal posts and shade structures
are showing signs of age and rust.A new playground would be likewise designed to serve 2-5-and 5-12-year-
old age groups,an industry standard.New equipment is envisioned,however,to be more accessible to children
and caretakers with disabilities and provide for improved large and small motor skill development and
socialization skills.
With a total project budget of $6 million,$2.2 million would come from bond funds with the remaining $3.8
million from Park Impact fees.Staff recommends replacement of the playground to coincide with the final
phase of construction of the Aquatic Center,directly adjacent to the playground.Reopening of the new all-
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 2 of 6
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
phase of construction of the Aquatic Center,directly adjacent to the playground.Reopening of the new all-
abilities playground is projected for late 2025.
FUNDING STRATEGIES
The above project(s), if approved by Council, require a comprehensive funding plan.
Parks Impact Fees
Parks Impact Fees can provide partial funding for these projects.Authorized by the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000,et
seq.),the City of South San Francisco imposes impact fees on new development projects in order to mitigate the impacts caused by
new development on public services.While the City has a number of impact fees,the impact fees related to parks consists of two
separate categories: Park Construction Fee and Parkland Acquisition Fee (together, the “Parks Impact Fee”).
The following table shows the projected Park Impact Fee revenues over the next five fiscal years (“FY”)based upon the development
projects that are expected to be completed:
Table 1: Five Year Parks Impact Fee Projection through FY2025-26
FY Estimated Revenue*
21-22 $ 4,278,364
22-23 $ 3,664,986
23-24 $ 3,640,800
24-25 $ 6,662,362
25-26 $ 12,206,383
*Estimated based on current forecast of development environment; subject to change.
However, there are three key considerations/risks to the use of the Parks Impact Fees:
1.Revenue Risk.Impact Fees,in general,are a notoriously unreliable revenue source as the timing of
the collection is fully dependent upon the developer.If the development project is halted for any
reason,there is real risk that the City may not realize the anticipated revenue.Relying on future Park
Impact fees to fund a portion of the Bridges and Playground may risk the completion of the project
itself if monies are not available.
2.Timing Considerations.The Bridges and Playground are slated to be completed in 2024 and 2025,
respectively.Based upon the impact fee projections,$7.3 million is expected to be available in FY
2022-23 and FY 2023-24.
3.Other Parks Projects.By committing future Parks Impact Fees towards these two projects,capital
work for other parks projects, like those identified under Parks 11, may need to be delayed.
Measure W Lease Revenue Bonds
Given the above,the sale of a third tranche of Measure W Lease Revenue Bonds may be the best option to guarantee that funding
is fully in place to ensure the successful completion of the Aquatic Center and Sports Field.Lease Revenue Bonds will also be
available to fund a portion of the Bridges and Playground projects.
As the Budget Subcommittee members are aware,the City issued the first tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in March 2020 to
finance the Police Station.The City issued the second tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in June 2021 to finance the (a)Library,
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 3 of 6
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
finance the Police Station.The City issued the second tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in June 2021 to finance the (a)Library,
Parks and Recreation (LPR) Building; (b) Streets Program, and (c) solar roofs for LPR and the Corp Yard.
The chart below shows a projection of Measure W revenues against all known existing expenditure obligations.
Chart 1: Measure W Revenues vs. Current Debt Service
Through FY 2023-24,the difference between Measure W revenues and expenditures (represented by the
striped,green bar)is reserved and will be used towards the Civic Campus project.However,after FY 2023-24,
the City does have the financial capacity to absorb the debt service of a third bond financing.Given the $72
million cost for all Projects, the following is the current funding recommendation:
Projects Bonds Caltrain Grant Impact Fees Total
Ballfield $12,300,000 $1,700,000 $14,000,000
Aquatic Center $49,000,000 $49,000,000
Bridges $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,000,000
Playground $2,200,000 $3,800,000 $6,000,000
$ 65,000,000 $1,700,000 $5,300,000 $72,000,000
The following chart shows the projection of Measure W revenues against all expenditures obligations,
including the proposed third tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds:
Chart 2: Measure W Revenues vs. Current Debt Service and Proposed 3rd Tranche
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 4 of 6
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
As shown above, Measure W revenues are expected to exceed any debt service obligations, even with the
issuance of another $65 million of debt, with enough of coverage (revenue to debt service) ratio. The following
table shows the detailed numbers through the next 10 fiscal years:
Table 2: Measure W Revenues vs. Total Debt Service through FY 2030-31
1 Assumes
no growth in sales tax receipts from FY 2022-24 and 3.00% growth rate thereafter.
2 Assumes all-in total interest cost of 3.73% with 1st amortization in FY 2024-25.
Staff would work to refine the numbers above to adjust to the capital markets conditions should the City
Council decide to move forward with the discussed capital projects.
CONCLUSION
The park and recreation assets described in this report,the Orange Park baseball/softball field,Orange Pool,
Colma Creek Bridges,and the playground have served the community extremely well,providing recreation,
fitness,and wellness opportunities for thousands of residents for decades.Staff has conservatively assumed
no growth in sales tax receipts from FY 2022-24 and 3.00%growth rate thereafter.The financing is
structured with a minimum 1.10x debt service coverage ratio.Staff is confident that Measure W sales tax
receipts will be available to service the debt.
Attachments:
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 5 of 6
powered by Legistar™
File #:22-306 Agenda Date:4/26/2022
Version:1 Item #:3.
1.Presentation for City Council Study Session
2.Staff Report: Budget Standing Committee, April 26, 2021; File #21-332
3.Staff Report: City Council Meeting, September 28, 2021; File #21-746
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/22/2022Page 6 of 6
powered by Legistar™
Jason Wong, Acting Director of FinanceGreg Mediati, Director of Parks and RecreationJake Gilchrist, Director of Capital ProjectsPhilip Vitale, Deputy Director of Capital ProjectsApril 26, 2022Presentation to Budget Standing Committee
Overview of Measure W Voters approved Measure W ½ cent Sales Tax in 2015Measure W revenues and expenditures outside of General Fund2Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 6/30/2019 6/30/2020 6/30/2021 3/1/2022REVENUES$1,493,425 $8,886,653 $11,162,238 $12,644,947 $11,704,090 $13,379,292 7,435,054EXPENDITURESCivic Campus211,992 382,776 4,925,872 8,793,377 10,255,536 16,440,209 1,819,341EV Charging Stations31,284Street Paving Program‐495,162 4,122,270 1,189,851 127,882 949,678Debt Service‐‐‐ ‐407,156 2,767,200 2,476,908Payroll‐‐‐‐ ‐267,867 173,107TOTAL EXPENDITURES$211,992 $877,938 $9,048,241 $9,983,229 $10,790,573 $20,424,954 $4,500,640Revenues Less Expenditures$1,281,433 $8,008,716 $2,113,996 $2,661,719 $913,518‐$7,045,662$2,934,414FUND BALANCE$1,281,433 $9,290,149 $11,404,145 $14,065,864 $14,979,381 $7,933,719 $10,868,133
$- $2,500,000 $5,000,000 $7,500,000 $10,000,000 $12,500,000 $15,000,000 $17,500,000 $20,000,000 $22,500,000 $25,000,0002019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045FY19 Measure W Receipts = $12.6 millionFY20 Measure W Receipts = $11.7 millionFY21 Measure W Receipts = $13.4 millionCivic Campus Cash ExpendituresSERIES 2020A – Police Station Debt ServiceSERIES 2021A – Library, Parks and Recreation Debt ServiceMeasure W Cashflow (Revenue less Expenditure)Measure W Projected Revenues3
Proposed Capital Projects (Series 2022A Bonds)Orange Memorial Park Ballfield– Projected Cost = $14 milliono$12.3 million (Bond)o$1.7 million (Caltrans Grant)– Project Completion Summer 2023Orange Memorial Aquatic Center– Projected Cost = $49 milliono$49 million (Bond)– Project Completion Early 20254OMP Colma Creek Bridge Replacement– Projected Cost = $3 milliono$1.5 million (Bond)o$1.5 million (Park Fees FY 22-23)– Project Completion 2024OMP Playground Replacement– Projected Cost = $6 milliono$2.2 million (Bond)o$3.8 million (Park Fees FY 22-24)– Project Completion Late 2025
Sports Field Project5Synthetic TurfBaseball, Softball and Soccer FieldsConcession BuildingConstruction Contract Awarded February 2022Construction Starting May 2022
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center6Construct a new 28,500SF facilityTwo pools: lap and warm waterRentable multi-use/party roomSwimmer's loungeDesign Finalized Summer 2022
Main Playground Replacement7Originally installed early 2012Surfacing and equipment replacementReplace with inclusive elements for all-abilities
Colma Creek Bridge Project8Replace existing pedestrian bridges at Colma CreekProvide accessible path of travel connecting north and south portions of Orange Park
$- $2,500,000 $5,000,000 $7,500,000 $10,000,000 $12,500,000 $15,000,000 $17,500,000 $20,000,000 $22,500,000 $25,000,0002019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045FY19 Measure W Receipts = $12.6 millionFY20 Measure W Receipts = $11.7 millionFY21 Measure W Receipts = $13.4 millionCivic Campus Cash ExpendituresPROPOSED SERIES 2022A Bonds – Estimated Debt ServiceSERIES 2020A – Police Station Debt ServiceSERIES 2021A – Library, Parks and Recreation Debt ServiceMeasure W Cashflow (Revenue less Expenditure)Measure W Projected Revenues9
Projected Cashflow DetailDate Estimated SalesTax Receipts(Measure W)1Series 2020A: Debt Service (Police Station)Series 2021A: Debt Service (LPR, Street Paving, Solar Roofs)PROPOSED Series 2022A:Debt Service(Pool and Sports Field)2Remaining Measure W FundsDebt Service Coverage Ratio6/30/22 $13,379,292 $2,765,450 $5,522,383 $5,091,459 1.61x 6/30/23 13,379,292 2,766,450 5,523,000 5,089,842 1.61x6/30/24 13,379,292 2,764,950 5,521,800 5,092,542 1.61x 6/30/2513,780,671 2,765,950 5,522,200 4,265,382 1,227,139 1.10x 6/30/2614,194,091 2,764,200 5,524,000 4,602,850 1,303,041 1.10x 6/30/2714,619,914 2,764,700 5,522,000 4,607,100 1,726,114 1.13x 6/30/2815,058,512 2,762,200 5,526,200 4,606,850 2,163,262 1.17x 6/30/2915,510,267 2,764,800 5,521,200 4,607,100 2,617,167 1.20x 6/30/3015,975,575 2,765,200 5,519,200 4,607,600 3,083,575 1.24x 6/30/3116,454,842 2,763,400 5,523,800 4,603,100 3,564,542 1.28x 1Assumes no growth in sales tax receipts from FY 2022 – 2024 and 3.00% CAGR thereafter2Assumes all-in true interest cost of 3.73%.10
Bond Sale StatisticsDescriptionPhase I(Police Station)Phase II(LPR + Streets)(PROPOSED)Phase III(Pool + Sports Field)Delivery Date 3/11/2020 6/16/2021 6/2/2022Bond Proceeds $ 53,800,000 $ 104,000,000 $ 65,000,000Total Interest Cost2.27%2.29% 3.69%Average Annual Debt Service$2,756,755 $5,531,499 $4,469,201Total Debt Service$72,288,256 $138,056,983 $107,248,40111LPR Project $76 MStreets Project $24 MSolar Project $ 4 MAquatic Center $49.0 MSports Field $12.3 MPlayground $2.2 MBridge $1.5 M
QUESTIONS12
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
Study session regarding two Capital Improvement Projects at Orange Memorial Park,synthetic turf sports field
and proposed replacement of Orange Pool,and possible funding strategies.(Sharon Ranals,Assistant City
Manager, Janet Salisbury, Finance Director)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council Budget Subcommittee consider and provide direction regarding two
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)projects at Orange Memorial Park,including potential funding strategies:
construction of a synthetic turf multi-use sports field to be built over the Storm Water Capture project,which
has previously been approved as a CIP project and is in the design phase;and the proposed replacement of the
Orange Pool with an Aquatic Center.
BACKGROUND
The two projects at Orange Memorial Park which are the subject of this Study Session,a synthetic turf sports
field and the proposed replacement of the Orange Pool,are being considered together in this report since their
construction could occur within a similar time frame, and both involve significant funding commitments.
This report and presentation will discuss each project, including the following:
- existing conditions/need for the new amenities;
- status of the sports field project, which was approved as a CIP project in 2019/20;
- results of a feasibility study and vision for a new aquatic center;
- estimated project costs and cash flow needs over the anticipated design and construction
timeframes;
- forecast of anticipated Parks Impact Fees, which have traditionally been the primary funding
source for park projects;
- discussion of alternative funding strategies for these projects.
Multi-Sport Synthetic Turf Field
City Council members are familiar with the synergy between the Storm Water Capture (Phase 1)and Sports
Field replacement projects,which created a unique opportunity to develop multi-sport synthetic baseball,
softball,and soccer fields for youth and adults over the top of the Storm Water Capture system (Phase 2).Both
projects are located in the quadrant of the park where the baseball and softball fields have historically been
located, on Orange Avenue between Memorial Drive and the Colma Creek canal.
The Sports Field project will conserve water,provide for year-round play,significantly expand the number of
hours of play that can be scheduled,improve safety for players,and enhance the appearance and beauty of
Orange Memorial Park.Both the Stormwater and Sports Field projects were approved in the 2018/19 Capital
Improvement Program.The sports field project includes:(1)baseball,(1)softball,and (2)youth baseball fields;
(2)adult soccer,(2)junior soccer,and (4)youth soccer fields.Amenities include synthetic turf,lighting and
electronic scoreboards,30’chain link backstops with netting,aluminum bleachers,a restroom/concession
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
building, bullpens, dugouts, batting cages, portable goals and fencing, and landscape enhancements.
Project Duration and Timing of Expenditures
In November 2020,City Council awarded a contract to Verde Design to develop construction documents,
bidding and construction observation services for Phase 2,which continues to track to a $14 million total
budget.Staff anticipates that the full project funding is needed around March 2022 in order to award the
construction contract.This schedule is based on Engineering’s early-2022 projected completion of Phase 1,the
storm water capture project. Based on this schedule, staff expects the ballfield to open in late summer 2023.
Orange Pool/Aquatic Center
Orange Pool is South San Francisco’s only indoor municipal swimming pool. Opened in 1970, it continues to
serve as a community-wide destination for residents of all ages. The pool, which prior to the Covid-19
pandemic of 2020/21 was in operation year-round, seven days a week, offers critical life-skill/safety learn-to
swim programs, recreation, fitness, therapy, health and wellness activities. A list of the programs offered at the
pool includes the following:
•Open recreational swimming -includes special time slots for parents with babies or toddlers,
adults only (ages 18 years and up), all ages, and Friday Family Swim Nights.
•Sauna - adults 18 years and up
•Lap swim - adults 16 years and up
•Aqua-Zumba, aquatic exercise, and water aerobics (fitness exercise with music)
•Swimming lessons and classes for children and adults scheduled on a quarterly basis
•Swimming lessons/recreational swim for Parks and Recreation,and Boys and Girls Club
Summer Camp programs
•Red Cross lifeguard certification classes
•Red Cross health and safety classes
•Volunteer swim aide, instructor training
•Private pool rentals
•Co-sponsored competitive swim team, South San Francisco Aquatics Club (SSFAC)
User Data/Number of Participants
Pre-Covid-19,over 100,000 visits were made to Orange Pool annually (duplicated individuals).The pool serves
over 600 users per day during the summer,when program offerings are expanded to serve the demand for more
youth programming due to children being out of school for the summer,and to serve swimming lessons and
recreation swim offered through summer camp.During the fall,winter,and spring there are approximately 325
swimmers daily when lessons are in session.When lessons are not in session,which is about a two-week
period between each quarter,the pool continues to serve between 180-250 swimmers daily with lap swim and
open recreation swim programs.
The average daily attendance of pool patrons by age group is as follows:children age 0 -4,between 10 to 40;
ages 5 - 18, between 80 to 450; adults ages 18 - 65, 30 to 90; and seniors 65 and up, between 40 to 60.
Average daily attendance by program, which varies seasonally, is as follows: lap swim, 40; adult recreation
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 2 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
swim, 50 ; the SSF Aquatics Club, 80; exercise classes, 25; swim lessons, 130 (290 summer); summer
recreation swim (daily), 140; and weekend recreation swim, 70.
Prior to the pandemic, public demand for aquatic programs has grown year over year, well beyond the pool’s
capacity. There were a total of 4,124 spaces requested on waiting lists for swimming classes and programs in
2019, which represents 1,112 unduplicated individuals, many of whom were on multiple waiting lists.
Annual Maintenance Costs
Operational costs are approximately $150,000 -$200,000 per year in personnel and materials for maintenance
of the pool systems,not including daily custodial work,which is approximately an additional $50,000 per year.
This does not include periodic capital improvement costs for various repairs that have been made over the
years,such as replacing the pool’s plaster and ceramic tile bottom,locker and fixture replacement,HVAC
system,etc.However,budget requests in recent years for significant renovations have not moved forward,
pending a decision on the future of the building.
Facility Description/Existing Conditions
The one-story building has a floor area of approximately 11,500 square feet,and contains a lobby,25-yard,6-
lane swimming pool,locker rooms,staff office,and mechanical room.Constant maintenance and ongoing
repairs have certainly been made during the pool’s 51-year history,and much effort is expended to keep the
pool as functional and pleasant as possible.However,high humidity,chlorine vapors,and heavy public use
create a very harsh environment. Since its construction, the facility has not undergone any major rehabilitation.
Today,the deteriorated condition is obvious upon even casual observation.Issues include crumbling and worn
finish materials,dry-rotted wood,rusting steel structural and non-structural elements,deteriorated light fixtures,
cracked,uneven and sometimes slippery floors,corroded aluminum window sash,and large expanses of non-
safety glass.Nearly every architectural element and mechanical/electrical system in the pool is due for
replacement, except for the filters, which were recently replaced.
In recognition of these conditions,and the fact that the typical life expectancy of an indoor aquatic facility is 40
-50 years,a professional feasibility study was conducted in 2016 by Marcy Wong Donn Logan Architects.Due
to the size of the document,it has not been attached to this report,but is available for review in the City
Council office.The study’s conclusions,architectural concept design studies,and preliminary rough-order-of-
magnitude (ROM)opinions of probable costs are based upon findings from a number of sources.Interviews
were taken with Parks and Recreation personnel and other city staff.Comments were solicited and documented
at several public forums.Input from Orange Pool users and community members was taken via survey forms.
Multiple site visits were made by the consultant team for the purpose of technical condition assessments of the
existing facility,and remediation recommendations.The existing facility’s spatial layout and square foot areas
were assessed. A space program for a renovated or new pool was developed based on all of these sources.
The consultant team examined all structural and architectural systems,including mechanical,lighting,
plumbing,floor and wall finishes,water treatment systems,and windows and glazing.The report confirms that
the building’s design and construction are typical of the late 1960’s to early 1970’s.By today’s standards,
Orange Pool’s architectural,structural and other building systems are significantly below current building code
requirements and building owner expectations for seismic resistance,energy efficiency,water efficiency,indoor
air quality and comfort,architectural lighting,room acoustics,ADA accessibility,daylight control,
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 3 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
air quality and comfort,architectural lighting,room acoustics,ADA accessibility,daylight control,
sustainability,and a range of family/user accommodations.The existing facility is not compliant with
California Title 24 and federal ADA requirements for accessibility and energy efficiency.The building design is
well over a dozen code editions behind current applicable building code standards.
Typical of 1970’s construction,the building is not energy efficient.The exterior curtain walls and storefronts
have the original single glazed windows in aluminum frames.The majority of the building is comprised of
uninsulated CMU walls and concrete slab floors.The building’s lighting and electrical systems,mechanical
units and plumbing systems do not meet current water and energy conservation standards.
Timing for Replacement
Despite the City’s attentive custodianship of the building,overall,the building’s age and heavy use have
resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior.As noted previously,virtually every observable
component and system named above is part of the original construction and is well beyond the point of meriting
replacement.
Based on a recent review of the feasibility study,and the known condition of systems in place to date,staff
expects the facility will need to be closed within the next 0 to 5 years unless there is significant capital
investment or wholesale replacement.
Orange Pool is used seven days per week,year-round,with the exception of annual maintenance closures,
typically for two to three weeks in December.Understanding the great community benefit provided to residents
of all ages,abilities,socio-economic backgrounds,and ability to pay for programs,the City subsidizes aquatics
programs,and has adopted affordable and inclusive fees.The Parks and Recreation Department also maintains
a donation-backed scholarship fund to provide financial assistance to those unable to pay full fees,and works
with customers as much as possible to avoid turning anyone away if unable to afford full fees.In addition to its
adult and youth learn to swim and fitness programs,the pool has a large senior aquatic therapeutic and fitness
program.
Options for Replacement or Renovation
After detailed analysis of existing conditions and community demand,the consultants drafted three scenarios
for replacement or rehabilitation of the existing pool facility, as summarized below.
Scenario A - Renovate the Existing Orange Pool Facility ($10,522,275 as of 2017)
This scenario consists of not only cosmetic architectural renovations,but also upgrading and/or replacement of
all the engineering systems to meet or come as close as possible to current design standards.Given severely
outdated layout of the facility,building systems and deteriorated physical conditions,any rehabilitation that is
designed to approach or meet conformance with current code standards would be no less,if not more
expensive, than a new ground up construction.
This scenario is the least beneficial long term option for many reasons:
1.The benefit to cost ratio is very low
2.Keeping the existing building precludes superior master planning options
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 4 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
3.Renovations of this facility will likely result in unforeseen expenses from unknown conditions
Scenario B - Construct a Separate New Warm Pool Facility ($21,380,835 as of 2017)
In Scenario B the construction of a new warm pool facility was explored,independently of the Orange Pool
renovation described in Scenario A.Unfortunately,due to seismic requirements,the warm water pool would
essentially be a standalone building, bridged with a covered walkway. Benefits of this approach are:
1.The flexibility of phasing renovation of the existing pool and building a new teaching pool
2.Flexibility and funding of overall projects in phases
3.The completion of a new, code-compliant, warm water teaching pool facility
Disadvantages of this approach include:
1.A warm pool facility separate from the lap pool facility needs additional staffing
2.Separate warm and lap pool buildings require more complicated security measures
3.Renovation to existing facility (with low cost to benefit ratio) still needed
4.Keeping the existing building precludes superior master planning options
5.Renovations of this existing facility will likely result in unforeseen expenses from unknown conditions
Scenario C - Construct a New Two-Pool Facility ($22,363,600 as of 2017)
This scenario envisions demolishing Orange Pool and constructing a new facility.The new natatorium includes
both a lap pool and a warm water teaching pool.The bathhouse has the possibility of being two stories.This
approach has the most advantages of any of the scenarios:
1. The facility layout can be designed for maximum functional efficiency
2. A new facility with both pools in one natatorium does not require redundant staffing
3. A well-designed new facility with two pools can simplify facility and security management
4. A modern aquatics center can be designed with ancillary spaces that are ideal for modern
families with two working parents and young children
5. A new facility will be designed to be ADA accessible, environmentally healthy, energy
efficient, sustainably designed, architecturally inviting, and seismically safe
6. Razing the existing facility and building a ground-up facility allows park master planning options
7. A new facility reduces the likelihood of unforeseen expenses that occur in renovation projects
8. This scenario has the highest benefit to cost ratio
The Attachments to this report illustrate an exciting vision for a new aquatics center,as conceptualized in
Scenario C.In this amenity-rich concept,a new facility could be designed to complement the architecture of the
Fernekes Recreation Building, and create a campus feel to this quadrant of the park.
It is important to note that the pool feasibility study was completed in 2016,and only contemplated
construction of a new aquatics center at its current location.Should the aquatic center project move forward,
more analysis would be done to update design and construction cost estimates,and that all options are
considered. The concepts developed through the feasibility study are illustrative.
Project Duration and Timing of Expenditures
With a projected total project budget of $25 million,staff anticipates the need for approximately $3 million
dollars to establish professional services agreement for design,cost estimating,site investigation,and design
review in FY21-22.Following the planning and design phase,the balance of the project funding is needed at
the time of contract award,currently targeted for early 2023.Based on this schedule,staff projects the new
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 5 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
the time of contract award,currently targeted for early 2023.Based on this schedule,staff projects the new
aquatics center to open Fall 2024.
FUNDING STRATEGIES
The above project(s), if approved by Council, require a funding plan.
A.Parks Impact Fees
Parks Impact Fees can provide partial funding for these projects.Authorized by the Mitigation Fee Act (Government
Code 66000,et seq.),the City of South San Francisco imposes impact fees on new development projects in order to
mitigate the impacts caused by new development on public services.While the City has a number of impact fees,the
impact fees related to parks consists of two separate categories:Park Construction Fee and Parkland Acquisition Fee
(together, the “Parks Impact Fee”).
The following is the available unappropriated Parks Impact Fee fund balances as of March 31, 2021:
Parks Construction:$3,878,281
Parks Acquisition:$ 940,559
TOTAL Available:$4,818,840
As shared with the City Council via a memorandum from the City Manager, Mike Futrell, dated February 10, 2021, the
following table shows the projected Park Impact Fee revenues over the next five years:
Fiscal Year
(“FY”)
Estimated Park Impact Fee*
21-22 $ 4,278,364
22-23 $ 3,664,986
23-24 $ 3,492,800
24-25 $ 3,883,575
25-26 $ 7,322,383
*Estimated based on current forecast of development environment; subject to change.
While the above revenues are dependent upon the size,scale and timing of the private developments throughout the City,
based upon current forecasts,it is expected that an additional $22.6 million may be available by June 30,2026.This is in
addition to the $4.8 million already available in the Parks Impact Fee Funds.
B.Funding the Sports Field Improvements Alone
The current expectation is that Sports Field Project will necessitate a total budget of $14 million with the facility open by
late summer/early fall of 2023.Based on the currently available Park Impact Fees plus the forecast for the next two fiscal
years, staff estimates that $12,762,190 would be available for the project.
Total Available as of 3/31/2021:$ 4,818,840
Forecasted Revenues (FY 21-23):$ 7,943,350
TOTAL Available:$12,762,190
With the above,the Sports Field Project would face an estimated $1.3 million shortfall.However,with the expected
availability of other sources of funding,such as grants,the Sports Field Project,if approved by Council,could be funded
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 6 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
availability of other sources of funding,such as grants,the Sports Field Project,if approved by Council,could be funded
on a pay-as-you-go basis,with the lion’s share being funded through Parks Impact Fees.The risk is that developments
slow, thus slowing receipt of needed Parks Impact Fees to fund the Sports Field Project.
C.Funding the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center and Sports Field Improvements
The projected total budget to fully fund the construction of the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center is $25 million,with
the hopes that if approved by Council,the new aquatic facility would be completed by fall/early winter of 2024.
Combined with the Sports Field Project,the total expected cost for both the Aquatic Center and Field projects is $39
million.
Sports Field Project:$ 14,000,000
Orange Pool Project:$ 25,000,000
Total Capital Need:$ 39,000,000
If Council wishes to move forward with both projects,staff recommends that Council consider the sale of a
third tranche of Measure W Lease Revenue Bond to partially fund both the Aquatic Center and Sports Field
Projects.
The current Parks Impact Fee forecast as shown in Section A above shows that if development keeps pace with
expectations,over $16.2 million may be available to the City over the next three fiscal years ($4.8 million
available now in the Parks Impact Fee Fund plus an additional $11.4 million collected in FY21-24).Clearly,the
collection of Parks Impact Fee alone would not allow for fully funding both projects,even assuming all
developer fees are paid on-time as forecasted.
However,Council can consider the sale of additional Lease Revenue Bonds to coincide with the completion of
the storm water capture project.Issued in 12-15 months from now,the additional sale of approximately $25
million of Lease Revenue Bonds would allow the City to fund both the Aquatics Center and Sports Field
Projects. This would provide financial certainty that the funds will be available when needed.
As the Budget Subcommittee members are aware,the City issued the first tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in
March 2020 to finance the bulk of the Police Station.The second tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds to fund the
Library, Parks and Recreation Building is expected to be completed by early June 2021.
The chart below shows a projection of Measure W revenues against all debt service obligations assuming
Council moves forward with an additional sale of $25 million of Lease Revenue Bonds in mid-2022 for the
Sports Field and Aquatic Center Projects.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 7 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
Chart 1: Measure W Revenues vs. Total Debt Service
The table below shows the numerical cash flow data of the above chart through FY2029-30:
Table 1: Measure W Revenues vs. Total Debt Service through FY2029-30
1 Assumes no growth in sales tax receipts from FY 2021-24 and 3.00% growth rate thereafter.
2 Assumes all-in total interest cost of 2.58%.
3 Assumes all-in total interest cost of 2.83%.
As shown above,Measure W revenues are expected to safely exceed any debt service obligations,even with
the issuance of another $25 million of debt.Staff would work to refine the projections over the course of the
next year should the City Council decide to move forward with the discussed capital projects.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 8 of 9
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-332 Agenda Date:4/26/2021
Version:1 Item #:
CONCLUSION
The two park and recreation assets described in this report,the Orange Park baseball/softball field,and the
Orange Pool,have served the community extremely well,providing recreation,fitness,and wellness
opportunities for thousands of residents for decades.Both are now well beyond their useful lives,and exhibit
all of the challenges that come with antiquated resources.This includes insufficient capacity for a growing
population,high maintenance and repair costs,safety concerns,ADA issues,poor energy and water efficiencies,
and poor aesthetics.
Although it would be possible to construct the Sports Field project alone using Park Impact Fees,current
economic conditions make the timing of development projects and the receipt of impact fees uncertain.Staff
recommends the sale of approximately $25 million of Lease Revenue Bonds,which would allow the City to
fund both the Aquatics Center and Sports Field Projects.This would provide financial certainty that the funds
will be available when needed.Addressing both of these needs at the same time is an extraordinary opportunity
to create safe,modern,efficient,environmentally sustainable,functional,and beautiful public assets that will be
transformative for Orange Memorial Park,and which will serve South San Francisco residents for generations
to come.
Attachments:
1.Presentation for City Council Study Session
2.Orange Park Multi-Sport Synthetic Turf Field Schematic
3.Aquatic Center Concept Site Plan, Wong Logan Feasibility Study, p. 131
4.Aquatic Center Concept Rendering Wong Logan Feasibility Study, p. 132
5.Aquatic Center Concept Floor Plan/1st Floor, Wong Logan Feasibility Study, p. 129
6.Aquatic Center Concept Floor Plan/2nd Floor, Wong Logan Feasibility Study, p. 130
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 9 of 9
powered by Legistar™
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
Study session regarding two Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)at Orange Memorial Park;the Sports Field Project and
Pool Replacement Project with recommended bond funding strategies.(Sharon Ranals,Assistant City Manager,and
Janet Salisbury, Finance Director)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council Budget Subcommittee consider and provide direction regarding
two Capital Improvement Program (CIP)projects at Orange Memorial Park,including potential
funding strategies:construction of a synthetic turf multi-use sports field,which has previously been
approved as a CIP project and is in the final design phase;and the proposed replacement of Orange Pool
with an Aquatic Center, possibly at a new location within the park.
BACKGROUND
The two projects at Orange Memorial Park which are the subject of this Study Session,a synthetic turf sports field and
the proposed replacement of the Orange Pool,are being considered together in this report since their construction could
occur within a similar time frame, and both involve significant funding commitments.
This report and presentation will discuss each project, including the following:
-Status of the Sports Field project, which was approved as a CIP project in 2018/19;
-Urgent need to replace the existing pool;
-Results of feasibility study exploring alternative locations for a new Aquatic Center;
-Cost comparison of constructing a new Aquatic Center at the current pool location versus a new
location;
-Recommended Aquatic Center location at the corner of Tennis Drive and West Orange Avenue;
-Aquatic Center design and construction process and timeline;
-Estimated project costs and cash flow needs over the anticipated
design/construction time frames;
-Forecast of anticipated Parks Impact Fees,which have traditionally been the primary funding source for
park projects; and
-Recommended combined bond funding for these projects.
Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project
The Sports Field project will conserve water,provide for year-round play,significantly expand the number of
hours of play that can be scheduled,improve safety for players,and enhance the appearance and beauty of
Orange Memorial Park.The project was approved in the 2018/19 Capital Improvement Program and includes:
one adult /full size baseball field,one softball field,and two youth baseball fields;one adult soccer field,two
junior soccer fields,and four youth soccer fields.Amenities include synthetic turf,lighting and electronic
scoreboards,30 foot chain link backstops with netting,aluminum bleachers,a restroom/concession building,
bullpens, dugouts, batting cages, portable goals and fencing, and landscape enhancements.
Sports Field Project Duration and Timing of Expenditures
In November 2020,City Council awarded a contract to Verde Design to develop construction documents,
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 1 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
In November 2020,City Council awarded a contract to Verde Design to develop construction documents,
bidding and construction observation services for the Sports Field project,which continues to track to a $14
million total budget.The project is scheduled to go out to bid in early 2022 with construction to begin in
spring 2022 to align with Engineering’s early-2022 projected completion of the Orange Memorial Park
Stormwater Capture Project.Based on this schedule,staff expects the sports fields to open in late summer
2023.
Orange Pool/Aquatic Center
Orange Pool is South San Francisco’s only indoor municipal swimming pool.Opened in 1970,it continues to
serve as a community-wide destination for residents of all ages.The pool,which prior to the COVID-19
pandemic of 2020/21 was in operation year-round,seven days a week,offers critical life-skill/safety learn-to
swim programs,recreation,fitness,therapy,health and wellness activities.A list of the programs offered at the
pool includes the following:
·Open recreational swimming - includes dedicated time slots for parents with babies or toddlers, adults
only (ages 18 years and up), all ages, and Friday Family Swim Nights;
·Sauna - adults 18 years and up;
·Lap swim - adults 16 years and up;
·Aqua-Zumba, aquatic exercise, and water aerobics (fitness exercise with music);
·Swimming lessons and classes for children and adults scheduled on a quarterly basis;
·Swimming lessons/recreational swim;
·Summer Camp programs for P&R and Boys and Girls Club;
·Red Cross lifeguard certification classes;
·Red Cross health and safety classes;
·Volunteer swim aide, instructor training;
·First responder rescue trainings;
·Private pool rentals;
·Co-sponsored competitive swim team, SSF Aquatics Club (SSFAC).
User Data/Number of Participants
Prior to COVID-19,over 100,000 visits were made to Orange Pool annually (including duplicated
individuals).The pool serves over 600 users per day during the summer,when program offerings are
expanded to serve the demand for more youth programming due to children being out of school for the
summer,and to serve swimming lessons and recreation swim offered through summer camp.During the fall,
winter,and spring there are approximately 325 swimmers daily when lessons are in session.When lessons
are not in session,which is about a two-week period between each quarter,the pool continues to serve
between 180-250 swimmers daily with lap swim and open recreation swim programs.
The average daily attendance of pool patrons by age group is as follows:
Age Group # Swimmers
Children 0 - 4 10 - 40
Youth 5 - 18 80 - 450
Adults 18 - 65 30 - 90
Seniors 65 and up 40 - 60City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 2 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
Age Group # Swimmers
Children 0 - 4 10 - 40
Youth 5 - 18 80 - 450
Adults 18 - 65 30 - 90
Seniors 65 and up 40 - 60
Average daily attendance by program,which varies seasonally,is as follows:lap swim,40;adult recreation swim,50;
the SSF Aquatics Club,80;exercise classes,25;swim lessons,130 (290 summer);summer recreation swim (daily),140;
and weekend recreation swim, 70.
Program # Swimmers
Lap Swim 40
Adult Recreation Swim 50
SSF Aquatics Club 80
Exercise Classes 25
Swim Lessons 130 (290 summer)
Summer Recreation Swim (daily)140
Weekend Recreation Swim 70
Prior to the pandemic,public demand for aquatic programs has grown year over year,well beyond the
pool’s capacity.There were a total of 4,124 spaces requested on waiting lists for swimming classes and
programs in 2019,which represents 1,112 unduplicated individuals,many of whom were on multiple
waiting lists.
Annual Maintenance Costs
Operational costs are approximately $150,000 -$200,000 per year in personnel and materials for
maintenance of the pool systems,not including daily custodial work,which is approximately an additional
$50,000 per year.This does not include periodic capital improvement costs for various repairs that have
been made over the years,such as replacing the pool’s plaster and ceramic tile bottom,locker and fixture
replacement,HVAC system,etc.However,budget requests in recent years for significant renovations have
not moved forward, pending a decision on the future of the building.
Facility Description/Existing Conditions
The one-story building has a floor area of approximately 11,500 square feet,and contains a lobby,a 25-yard
long six-lane swimming pool,locker rooms,staff offices,and mechanical room.Constant maintenance and
ongoing repairs have certainly been made during the pool’s 51-year history,and much effort is expended to
keep the pool as functional and pleasant as possible.However,high humidity,chlorine vapors,and heavy
public use create a very harsh environment.Since its construction,the facility has not undergone any major
rehabilitation.Today,the deteriorated condition is obvious upon even casual observation.Issues include
crumbling and worn finish materials,dry-rotted wood,rusting steel structural and non-structural elements,
deteriorated light fixtures,cracked,uneven and sometimes slippery floors,corroded aluminum window sashes,
and large expanses of non-safety glass.Nearly every architectural element and mechanical/electrical system
in the pool is due for replacement, except for the filters, which were recently replaced.
In recognition of these conditions,and the fact that the typical life expectancy of an indoor aquatic facility is 40
-50 years,a professional feasibility study was conducted in 2016 by Marcy Wong Donn Logan Architects.Due
to the size of the document,it has not been attached to this report,but is available for review in the City
Council office.The study’s conclusions,architectural concept design studies,and preliminary rough-order-of-
magnitude (ROM)opinions of probable costs are based upon findings from a number of sources,including
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 3 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
magnitude (ROM)opinions of probable costs are based upon findings from a number of sources,including
industry experts.Interviews were taken with Parks and Recreation personnel and other city staff.Comments
were solicited and documented at several public forums.Input from Orange Pool users and community
members was taken via survey forms.Multiple site visits were made by the consultant team for the purpose of
technical condition assessments of the existing facility,and remediation recommendations.The existing
facility’s spatial layout and square foot areas were assessed.A space program for a renovated or new pool was
developed based on all of these sources.
The consultant team examined all structural and architectural systems,including mechanical,lighting,
plumbing,floor and wall finishes,water treatment systems,and windows and glazing.The report confirms
that the building’s design and construction are typical of the late 1960’s to early 1970’s.By today’s standards,
Orange Pool’s architectural,structural and other building systems are significantly below current building
code requirements and building owner expectations for seismic resistance,energy efficiency,water efficiency,
indoor air quality and comfort,architectural lighting,room acoustics,ADA accessibility,daylight control,
sustainability,and a range of family/user accommodations.The existing facility is not compliant with
California Title 24 and federal ADA requirements for accessibility and energy efficiency.The building design
is well over a dozen code editions behind current applicable building code standards.
Typical of 1970’s construction,the building is not energy efficient.The exterior curtain walls and storefronts
have the original single glazed windows in aluminum frames.The majority of the building is comprised of
uninsulated CMU walls and concrete slab floors.The building’s lighting and electrical systems,mechanical
units and plumbing systems do not meet current water and energy conservation standards.
Timing for Replacement
Despite the City’s attentive custodianship of the building,overall,the building’s age and heavy use have
resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior.As noted previously,virtually every observable
component and system named above is part of the original construction and is well beyond the point of
meriting replacement.
Based on a recent review of the feasibility study,and the known condition of systems in place to date,staff
expects the facility will need to be closed within the next 0 to 5 years unless there is significant capital
investment or wholesale replacement.
Prior to COVID,Orange Pool was used seven days per week,year-round,with the exception of annual
maintenance closures,typically for two to three weeks in December.Understanding the great community
benefit provided to residents of all ages,abilities,socio-economic backgrounds,and ability to pay for
programs,the City subsidizes aquatics programs,and has adopted affordable and inclusive fees.The Parks and
Recreation Department also maintains a donation-backed scholarship fund to provide financial assistance to
those unable to pay full fees,and works with customers as much as possible to avoid turning anyone away if
unable to afford full fees.In addition to its adult and youth learn to swim and fitness programs,the pool has a
large senior aquatic therapeutic and fitness program.
Location Options for Aquatic Center Replacement
In April 2021 staff presented to the Budget Sub-Committee the Wong and Logan Feasibility Study with
recommendation of the construction of a new two-pool facility.In May 2021 staff engaged Group4 Architects
from the City’s on-call architecture firm list to explore alternative Aquatic Center locations within Orange Park
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 4 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
from the City’s on-call architecture firm list to explore alternative Aquatic Center locations within Orange Park
and validate construction costs.
Working from the two-pool facility approach identified in the Wong and Logan study,Group4 refined the
program to include an 8-lane/25-meter pool,separate teaching pool,swimmer’s lounge,rentable multi-
use/party room,staff and pool director offices,locker rooms and support spaces for mechanical equipment
within a 28,500 SF single-story facility.
With input from staff and Callander Associates,the consultant developing the Orange Park Master Plan,
Group4 assessed Orange Memorial Park to identify six (6)alternative pool locations.See Attachment 2,Site
Options.Using an evaluation matrix that considered the facility,site,capital costs and operational costs for
each of the 6 alternative locations as well as the current location were evaluated by staff.
The corner of Tennis Drive and West Orange Avenue was identified as the best alternative location for a new
facility for several reasons:
1.Comparable cost to current location;
2.Offers high visibility to those passing by and entering the park;
3.Convenient access with connection to both West Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive;
4.Opportunity to utilize the existing parking lot north of Tennis Drive;
5.Good solar orientation with a wall of glass to the South and views across the lawn;
6.Synergy between park buildings and elements;
7.Opportunity to relocate the Veterans Memorial into an accessible plaza space;
8.Minimal disruption to operations anticipated, phased construction will allow the existing pool to remain
operational during construction of new facility with minimal closure due to move, commissioning and
training.
Attached to this report is a diagrammatic plan of the building,plaza and parking layout along with a
conceptual rendering of the Aquatic Facility.A new facility could be designed to complement the architecture
of the Fernekes Recreation Building, and create a campus feel to this quadrant of the park.
Aquatic Center Project Duration and Timing of Expenditures
With a projected total project budget of $33.75 million,including escalation of 4%per year to mid-
construction of Q3 2023,the overall project cost would be similar for a new facility were it to be constructed
in the existing location or at the proposed Tennis Drive and West Orange Ave.location.Staff anticipates a
preliminary project timeline as follows:
Programming and Planning July 2021 - March 2022
Design April - December 2022
Bid January - March 2023
Construction April 2023 - September 2024
Close-Out October - December 2024
If City Council directs staff to move forward with design of a new facility in October 2021,a new Aquatic
Facility could open early 2025.With construction of the facility at a new location,the existing pool facility
could remain open,allowing for uninterrupted aquatic service to the community.Upon completion of
construction of a new pool facility the existing pool facility would be demolished and a parking lot
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 5 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
construction of a new pool facility the existing pool facility would be demolished and a parking lot
constructed in its place.
FUNDING STRATEGIES
The above project(s), if approved by Council, require a comprehensive funding plan.
Parks Impact Fees
Parks Impact Fees can provide partial funding for these projects.Authorized by the Mitigation Fee Act
(Government Code 66000,et seq.),the City of South San Francisco imposes impact fees on new development
projects in order to mitigate the impacts caused by new development on public services.While the City has a
number of impact fees,the impact fees related to parks consists of two separate categories:Park Construction
Fee and Parkland Acquisition Fee (together, the “Parks Impact Fee”).
The following is the available unappropriated Parks Impact Fee fund balances as of June 30, 2021:
Parks Construction:$5,171,284
Parks Acquisition:$ 561,161
TOTAL Available:$5,732,445
The following table shows the projected Park Impact Fee revenues over the next five fiscal years (“FY”) based
upon the development projects that are expected to be completed:
Table 1: Five Year Parks Impact Fee Projection through FY2025-26
FY Estimated Revenue*
21-22 $ 4,278,364
22-23 $ 3,664,986
23-24 $ 3,640,800
24-25 $ 4,701,362
25-26 $ 7,322,383
*Estimated based on current forecast of development environment; subject to change.
While the above revenues are dependent upon the size,scale and timing of the private developments
throughout the City,based upon current forecasts,it is expected that an additional $23.6 million may be
available by June 30,2026.With the $5.7 million already available in the Parks Impact Fee Funds,that is an
estimated total of $29.3 million in Park Impact Fees.
Park Impact Fees for Aquatic Center and Sports Field Improvements
At the April study session earlier this year,Council expressed an interest to pursue both the Orange Memorial
Park Aquatic and Sports Field Improvements.The expected total cost for both the Aquatic Center and Field
Projects (“Projects”) is $48 million:
Sports Field Project:$ 14,000,000
Orange Pool Project:$ 34,000,000
Total Capital Need:$ 48,000,000
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 6 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.Sports Field Project:$ 14,000,000
Orange Pool Project:$ 34,000,000
Total Capital Need:$ 48,000,000
For the $14.0 million Sports Field Project,we already know that a $1.7 million Caltrans grant is available
stemming from the Storm Water project that is already underway.Therefore,the estimated net capital need to
fund both projects is $46.3 million:
Sports Field Project: $ 14,000,000
Less Caltrans Grant:($ 1,700,000)
Orange Pool Project: $ 34,000,000
Total Capital Need: $ 46,300,000
A possible funding source for a portion of the Sports Field and Orange Pool Projects is Parks Impact Fees,
which is discussed in the previous section.There is $5.7 million of unencumbered cash in the fund,plus the
expectation that the completion of development projects will add an additional $23.6 million over the next
five years,for a combined total of $29.3 million ($5.7 million plus $23.6 million).However,there are three
key considerations/risks to the use of the Parks Impact Fees:
1.Revenue Risk.Impact Fees,in general,are a notoriously unreliable revenue source as the timing of the
collection is fully dependent upon the developer.If the development project is halted for any reason,
there is real risk that the City may not realize the anticipated revenue.Relying on the availability of all
$29.3 million to fund all of the Sports Field and a portion of the Orange Pool Project may risk the
completion of the project itself if monies are not available.
2.Timing Considerations.The Sports Field Project is slated to be completed in summer/early fall of
2023,with the aquatic facility,if approved,to be completed by the end of 2024.Based upon the impact
fee projections,only $17.3 million is expected to be available by the fall of 2024 between the $5.7
million already available in the fund plus the projections in years one through three (FY 21-22 through
FY 23-24).Even if Council elected to fully fund just the Sports Field on a pay-as-you-go basis from
the Parks Impact Fees,there may be a mismatch between when bills need to be paid and when
revenues are collected.
3.Other Parks Projects.By committing all of the near-term availability of the Parks Impact Fees
towards these two projects,capital work for other parks projects,like those identified under Parks 11,
may need to be delayed.
Measure W Lease Revenue Bonds for Aquatic Center and Sports Field Improvements
Given the above,the sale of a third tranche of Measure W Lease Revenue Bonds may be the best option to
guarantee that funding is fully in place to ensure the successful completion of both projects.
As the Budget Subcommittee members are aware,the City issued the first tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in
March 2020 to finance the Police Station.The City issued the second tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds in June
2021 to finance the (a)Library,Parks and Recreation (LPR)Building;(b)Streets Program,and (c)solar roofs
for LPR and the Corp Yard.
The chart below shows a projection of Measure W revenues against all known existing expenditure
obligations.
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 7 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
Chart 1: Measure W Revenues vs. Current Debt Service
Through FY 2023-24,the difference between Measure W revenues and expenditures (represented by the striped
green bar)is reserved and will be used towards the Civic Campus project.However,after FY 2023-24,the City
does have the financial capacity to absorb the debt service of a third bond financing.Given the $48 million cost
for both Projects, the following is the current funding recommendation:
Lease Revenue Bond Proceeds (Series
2022A - 3rd Tranche)
$ 41,000,000
Parks Impact Fee $ 5,300,000
Caltrans Grant $ 1,700,000
Total Capital Need for Projects:$ 48,000,000
The allocation of $5.3 million from the already available Parks Impact Fees would allow the project team to
have enough cash flexibility in the early stages of the Projects as it awaits the issuance of the third tranche of
Lease Revenue Bonds, which would be issued in summer/fall of 2022, if approved.
The following chart shows the projection of Measure W revenues against all expenditures obligations,
including the proposed third tranche of Lease Revenue Bonds:
Chart 2: Measure W Revenues vs. Current Debt Service and Proposed 3rd Tranche
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 8 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
As shown above,Measure W revenues are expected to exceed any debt service obligations,even with the
issuance of another $41 million of debt,with enough of coverage (revenue to debt service)ratio.The
following table shows the detailed numbers through the next 10 fiscal years:
Table 2: Measure W Revenues vs. Total Debt Service through FY 2030-31
1 Assumes 1.00% growth in sales tax receipts from FY 2021-24 and 3.00% growth rate thereafter.
2 Assumes all-in total interest cost of 3.00% with 1st amortization in FY 2024-25.
Staff would work to refine the numbers above to adjust to the capital markets conditions should the City
Council decide to move forward with the discussed capital projects.
CONCLUSION
The two park and recreation assets described in this report,the Orange Park baseball/softball field,and the
Orange Pool,have served the community extremely well,providing recreation,fitness,and wellness
opportunities for thousands of residents for decades.Both are now well beyond their useful lives,and exhibit
all of the challenges that come with antiquated resources.This includes insufficient capacity for a growing
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 9 of 10
powered by Legistar™
File #:21-746 Agenda Date:9/28/2021
Version:1 Item #:2.
all of the challenges that come with antiquated resources.This includes insufficient capacity for a growing
population,high maintenance and repair costs,safety concerns,ADA issues,poor energy and water efficiencies,
and poor aesthetics.
Although it would be possible to construct the Sports Field project alone using Park Impact Fees,current
economic conditions make the timing of development projects and the receipt of impact fees uncertain.Staff
recommends the sale of approximately $41 million of Lease Revenue Bonds,which would allow the City to
fund both the Aquatics Center and Sports Field Projects.This would provide financial certainty that the funds
will be available when needed.Addressing both of these needs at the same time is an extraordinary opportunity
to create safe,modern,efficient,environmentally sustainable,functional,and beautiful public assets that will be
transformative for Orange Memorial Park,and which will serve South San Francisco residents for generations
to come.
Attachments:
1.Presentation for City Council Study Session
2.Site Options
3.Preferred Site Option Plan
4.Preferred Site Option Rendering
City of South San Francisco Printed on 4/20/2022Page 10 of 10
powered by Legistar™