HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEIR Appendix E - Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Supporting InformationCity of South San Francisco—General Plan Update, Zoning Code Amendments, and Climate Action Plan
Draft Program EIR
FirstCarbon Solutions
Appendix E:
Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Kenneth L. Finger, Ph.D.
Consulting Paleontologist
18208 Judy St., Castro Valley, CA 94546-2306 510.305.1080 [email protected]
November 8, 2021
Dana DePietro
FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Re: Paleontological Records Search: South San Francisco General Plan Update
(5000.0006), San Mateo County
Dear Dr. DePietro:
As per the request of Madelyn Dolan, I have performed a records search on the University of
California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP) database for the proposed South San Francisco
General Plan Update. The area of interest is located on the South San Francisco and Cordelia
quadrangles (USGS 7.5'-series topographic maps). The proposed General Plan Update will serve
as the blueprint for the City of South San Francisco’s vision through the year 2040. The General
Plan Update revises the approved 1999 General Plan to guide growth and land development of
the City, while maintaining its high quality of life, diverse and inclusive community, livable
neighborhoods, excellent services, culture of innovation, and environmental leadership to ensure
all people have an equitable opportunity to reach their full potential. The General Plan Update
anticipates approximately 14,324 net new housing units and approximately 13,344 net new
employment opportunities by 2040.
Geologic Mapping
As shown on part of the geologic map by Brabb and Pampeyan (1983) included in this report (see
next page), the surface of the project site (yellow outline) and its surrounding half-mile search area
(white outline) consists of five Holocene units (Qyf, Qyfo, Qcl, Qal, Qaf), the Pleistocene Colma
Formation (Qc), the Plio-Pleistocene Merced Formation (Tms), and five lithologic “members” of
the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Franciscan Complex (KJs, fg, fs, fsr, sp). Due to its areal extent
and geological complexity, the smaller mapped units can be difficult to decipher on the map,
particularly as viewed here. It is therefore advisable that all future paleontological investigations
for specific projects within the City of South San Francisco refer to the map at its original (print)
size.
Paleontological Records Search: South San Francisco General Plan Update (5000.0006) K.L. Finger
2
MAP LEGEND
Qyf Younger (inner) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene
Qyfo Younger (outer) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene)
Qcl Colluvium (Holocene)
Qal Alluvium (Holocene)
Qaf Artificial fill (Holocene)
Qc Colma Formation (Pleistocene)
QTm Merced Formation (upper Pliocene & lower Pleistocene)
Franciscan Complex (Jurassic–Cretaceous)
KJs Unnamed sandstone
fg Greenstone
fs Sandstone
fsr Sheared rock
sp Serpentinite
Paleontological Records Search: South San Francisco General Plan Update (5000.0006) K.L. Finger
3
Paleontological Records Search
Holocene deposits are too young to be fossiliferous; hence, the paleontological records search of
the UCMP database focused on the older units. Although the database does not record any fossils
of any kind from the Colma Formation, Rodda and Baghal (1993) reported the most abundant
collection of Pleistocene vertebrates from San Francisco is from an excavation in this unit at
Telegraph Hill, and it includes Mammuthus cf. M. columbi (Columbian mammoth) and Bison cf.
B. latifrons (bison). The Colma Formation is therefore assigned a high paleontological sensitivity
and a low paleontological potential.
For the Merced Formation, the UCMP database records 23 vertebrate localities in San Mateo, San
Francisco, Marin, and Sonoma counties, which yielded 172 specimens ranging in assigned age
from Pleistocene to Miocene. Stirton and Goeriz (1942) referred to the Merced Formation as late
Miocene and Pliocene age; hence, the Miocene assignments of UCMP localities in the Merced
went unquestioned for many years. More recently, Ingram and Ingle (1998) used strontium isotope
chronostratigraphy to constrain the base of the formation between 2.4 and 4.8 myr, which is
younger than the 5.333 myr base of the Pliocene, while pinning down the upper age of the unit to
0.45 myr. Accordingly, the USGS Lexicon of Geological Names defines the age range of the
Merced Formation as Pliocene–Pleistocene.
The Appendix of this report is a systematic listing of the taxa recorded from the Merced Formation.
The four San Mateo County localities yielded six specimens, including ground sloth, sea otter,
mammoth, and whale. There are also 10 plant localities in the Merced Formation: eight in San
Mateo County, one in San Francisco County, and one in Sonoma County. Nearest to South San
Francisco and about 1.5 miles to the northwest are six localities at Thornton State Beach, west of
Daly City. Among the collected plant specimens are cones of spruce or pine. In conclusion, the
Merced Formation is assigned a high sensitivity and a moderate potential for significant
paleontological resources.
No significant paleontological resources are recorded from the Franciscan Complex. Although
radiolarian microfossils have been found in its cherts, and invertebrates in its limestones, the
Franciscan lacks any sensitivity or potential for significant paleontological resources.
Paleontological Assessment and Mitigation Recommendations
I recommend paleontological monitoring of all proposed excavations in the Colma and Merced
formations, including those area where they are likely to be in the shallow subsurface below
Quaternary deposits, due to their high paleontological sensitivity for significant resources. Should
significant paleontological resources (e.g., bones, teeth, well-preserved plant elements) be
unearthed by the construction crew, their activities should be diverted at least 15 feet from the find
until a professional paleontologist has assessed them and, if deemed significant, salvaged them in
a timely manner. Collected fossils should be deposited in an appropriate repository (e.g., UCMP,
California Academy of Sciences) where they will be properly curated and made available for future
research.
Sincerely,
Paleontological Records Search: South San Francisco General Plan Update (5000.0006) K.L. Finger
4
References Cited
Brabb, E.E., and Pampeyan, E.H., 1983. Geologic map of San Mateo County. U.S. Geological
Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1257-A, 1:62,500.
Ingram, B.L., and Ingle, J.C., Jr., 1998, Strontium isotope ages of the marine Merced Formation,
near San Francisco, California. Quaternary Research, 50(2): 194-199.
Rodda, P.U., and Baghal, N., 1993. Late Pleistocene vertebrates from downtown San Francisco.
Journal of Paleontology 67(6): 1058–1063.
Stirton, R. A., and Goeriz, H. F., 1942, Fossil vertebrates from the superjacent deposits near
Knights Ferry, California: University of California Department of Geological Sciences 26:
447–472.
Paleontological Records Search: South San Francisco General Plan Update (5000.0006) K.L. Finger
5
APPENDIX
UCMP Database Records of Vertebrates from the Merced Formation
1= San Mateo County, 2 = San Francisco County, 3= Marin County, 4 = Sonoma County
A = Pleistocene, B = Pliocene, C = Miocene (should be revised to Pliocene)
Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish)
Order Batoidea
Family Myliobatidae
Myliobatus cf. californica (bat ray) 4C
Order Hexanchiformes
Family Hexanchidae
Hexanchus (sixgill shark) 4C
Order Lamniformes
Family Cetorhinidae
Cetorhinus cf. maximus (basking shark) 4C
Family Lamnidae
Isurus hastalis (mako shark) 4C
Class Osteichthyes (boney fish)
Order Beloniformes
Family Belonidae? (needlefish) 4C
Order Clupeiformes
Family Clupeidae
Sardinops? (sardine) 4C
Order Lophiiformes
Family Lophidae (goosefish) 4C
Order Perciformes
Family Anarhichadidae
Anarhichthys ocellatus (wolf eel) 4C
Family Centropomidae
Epinephelus (grouper) 4C
Family Embiotocidae
cf. Damalichthys (surfperch) 4C
Family Scombridae
cf. Sarda (bonito) 4C
Family Serranidae
Stereolepis (sea bass) 4C
Order Salmoniformes
Family Salmonidae 4C (salmon)
Family Scorpaeniformes (rockfish)
Anisotremus 4C
Sebastes alutus 4C
Sebastes serviceps 4C
Class Aves (birds)
Order Charadriiformes
Family Alcidae
Praemancalla (Lucas auk) 4C
Order Procellariiformes
Family Procellariidae
Fulmarus? (fulmar) 4C
Class Mammalia
Order Artiodactyla (odd-footed ungulates)
Family Antilocapridae (pronghorn) 2A
Family Camelidae (camels)
Hemilauchenia (llama) 2A
Family Cervidae
Odocoileus (cf. mule deer) 3A
Order Carnivora
Family Mustellidae
Enhydra (sea otter) 1A
Family Odobenidae (walrus) 4C
Family Otariidae (eared seals)
Callorhinus ursinus 4B
cf. Thalassoleon cf. mexicanus 4B
Order Cetacea
Suborder Mysticeti (baleen whales) 1A
Family Balaenidae (baleen whales)
Balaenula (published) 4B
Family Delphinidae (dolphins)
cf. Delphinus 4B
Stenella graffmani 4C
Stenodelphis cf. S. sternbergi 4B
Family Pontoporiidae (dolphins)
Pontoporia sternbergi 4B
Order Perissodactyla (even-footed ungulates)
Family Equididae (horses)
Equus 2A
Order Proboscidea
Family Elephantidae
Mammuthus columbi (Columbian mammoth) 1A
Family Mammutidae
Mammut americanum (American mastodon) 2A
Order Sirenia (dugongs, manatees)
Family Dugongidae 4C
Order Xenartha (ground sloths)
Family Megalonychidae
Megalonyx 2A
Family Mylodontidae
Glossotherium 1A, 2A
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK