HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-09-13 e-packet
AGENDA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2006
7:00 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at
7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco,
California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment.
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances ). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for
your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it wilt be ready for Board action.
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR.
Vice Chair
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Boardmember
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
Clerk
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
_"_.m_.__,~,,~_._,",,~_,____~_~'''_..'._---~
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of August 9, 2006
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 13,2006
3. Resolution authorizing City Treasurer to deposit and withdraw funds with the State's
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
4. Report on Oyster Point I Transportation Demand Management (TDM) efforts and results
at the campus
CLOSED SESSION
5. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to 80
Chestnut Avenue (California Water Service); Agency Negotiator: Assistant Director Van
Duyn
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 13,2006
PAGE 2
RDA AGENDA ITEM #3
Redevelopment Agency
Staff Report
DATE: September 13,2006
TO: Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Richard A. Battaglia, Agency Treasurer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION RELATED TO CITY TREASURER
RECOlVlMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve the attached resolution authorizing the
City Treasurer to invest in the Redevelopment account held by the Local Agency Investment Fund
(LAIF).
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
On December 10,2003, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Treasurer to invest in
the City's LAIF account. LAIF has asked the City to approve another resolution clarifying that the
Treasurer may invest in LAIF's separate Redevelopment Agency account.
CONCLUSION:
Approval of the attached resolution will authorize the Agency Treasurer to invest Agency funds in the
Redevelopment LAIF account.
APprove4 ,r;::,
y . Nagel
ExecuLive Director
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF
MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT
FUND.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 730 of the statues of 1976, Section 164291.1 was added
to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State
Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State
Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, the Board does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the
Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the
Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein as in the best interests of the
Redevelopment Agency Board of South San Francisco.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the
City of South San Francisco that the Board hereby authorizes the deposit and withdrawal of the
Agency monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with
the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as
stated therein, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information
provided in that regard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the forwarding Agency officers or their successors in
office shall be authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency
Investment Fund: Richard A. Battaglia, Treasurer; Gloria F. Taormina, Deputy Treasurer; and
J ames Steele, Finance DirectorlDeputy Treasurer. The City Treasurer is an elected position, and
that position has the authority to appoint deputy treasurers at his or her discretion.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the 13th
day of September 2006, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
857606vl
ATTEST:
Secretary
RDA AGENDA ITEM #4
Redevelopment Agency
Staff Report
~'t\\ s~
'S
(0 n
>-< .-.
~ ~
v 0
C'4.lIFO?-~"'~
DATE:
September 13,2006
TO:
Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM:
Marty VanDuyn, Assistant Executive Director
SUBJECT:
BRIT ANNIA OYSTER POINT I (FORMERL Y BAY WEST COVE-SLOUGH)
REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) EFFORTS
AND RESULTS AT THE CAMPUS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board accept the annual report on TDM efforts.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
In 2000, when the overall Bay West Cove Specific Plan District approvals were granted to allow
office/R&D campuses on this and the adjacent site to the west, the developers, Slough and Hines,
each entered into an Owner Participation Agreement with the City. One provision of these
agreements requires annual monitoring and reporting on the campus Transportation Demand
Management efforts, to begin two years after initial building occupancy, followed by more detailed
analysis on a triennial basis. This is the first annual TDM report for the Britannia Oyster Point I
(BOP I) campus.
The TDM Plan for the project includes a wide variety of measures to encourage alternative modes of
travel, including shuttles to transit stations, transit pass subsidies, bicycle lockers, carpool/vanpool
preferential parking, electric vehicle charging stations, showers/clothes lockers, transit information
kiosks and reduced parking standards, and is designed to achieve a target of 35% alternative mode
usage.
Slough has hired the Hoyt Company to document and present the results ofthe TDM program efforts
on the site. As indicated in the attached report, the program has been very successful overall, with
results ranging from 25.7% to 35%, based on methodology used. The lower rate reflects the City's
very stringent requirement for survey response rate which requires that all non-responses to the
survey be counted as a drive alone trip. (Staff is currently considering revising this standard to reflect
a more reasonable response threshold that would still yield statistically reliable results.) The 35%
result reflects methodology utilized by the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (the
Alliance), the county's primary resource for promotion of alternative commute modes.
Staff Report
RE: BOP 1- TDM Report
Date: September 13,2006
Page 2 of2
The applicant and consultant will be available at the meeting to present an overview of the current
pro grams.
BY~
Marty VanDuyn
Assistant Executive Director
---
l..pprove
Attachment: Britannia Oyster Point 2005 TDM Summary Report
- ._-~--_._-~~_._~".,.,.._.-
r-
"
~--
f
BRI]ANNIA OYSTER POINT
!, I .-
:r:ijA~r~~~~r~~I,~~, DEMIA~,D-
'M~NAGEMENJ,RROGRAM
, I l" ~ L ~, ~ I .'
t,---:-' r ~ ~. I
! ' : l f
.' ~i I I
":" +-:~. I ~
-...; ~ I :;. .
~l_ I.~ :oJ l_
I
"J.:1
r...----
it\'
r
I
lilt>
I-'..~. ..<
~- ,. ----
'I' . ~
_' ffii/,~
~1;i ::
"
~
.
- tt
rn
,I
i
I,
I
,;,;",..
'"
~ _.... Ji::-~.
~;~:"~~f_:'j>' /.
N ,..,J
~'..,: ~jr -
.J-
'V~ :
.Lt.
, \.,.....
;:! .~.
. ~'
.. ~ .
.OJ,. ..)!I:~.:
.. "'-~~~~~,
.:: ~. ;.,: .I.."
. ~~:-
r'
Prepared for ( It.';'
sloughestates iii
international
Prepared In)
OJ THE HOYT COMPANY
A
--
PENINSULA
TRAFFIC
CONGESTION
RE1.IFF
ALLIANCE
September I, 2006
Ms. Susy Kalkin
Acting Chief Planner
City of South San Francisco
315 Maple Street
South San Francisco, CA 94083
RE: LEITER OF SUPPORT - BRITANNIA OYSTER POINT TRANSPORTATION
DEMAND MANAGEMENT EFFORTS
Dear Ms. Kalkin:
The Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance would like to submit this letter in
support of the Britannia Oyster Point project. The Britannia Oyster Point project has
implemented successful transportation demand management (TDM) strategies and
efforts that have increased alternative mode uses and ridesharing, decreased traffic and
congestion, and helped to improved air quality in the South San Francisco and the Bay
Area region.
Since 2002, the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance has worked closely with
Slough Estates' TDM consultant to support pre-move and on-site employee commute
program activities. These activities have included individual employer events, campus-
wide transportation fairs, survey promotions and shuttle services. We also provide
Alliance and 511 rideshare materials for all five campus transportation kiosks.
We are pleased with the TDM achievements attained by this project. Slough Estates
have taken a proactive approach to their requirement by providing ongoing TDM
consulting support and customized commute program training for each tenant. Four of
the tenants now manage their own comprehensive internal employee commute
programs.
On behalf of the Britannia Oyster Point project, Slough Estates also continues to provide
significant annual funding for the San Mateo Caltrain/BART shuttle program.
1150 Bayhill Drive, Suite 107, San Bruno, CA 94066 Phone (650) 588-8170 Fax (650) 588-8171 www.commllte.org
R
Ln
RIGEL. INC.
September 5, 2006
Ms. Susy Kalkin
Acting Chief Planner
City of South San Francisco
315 Maple Street
South San Francisco, CA 94083
RE: SUCCESSFUL RIGEL EMPLOYEE ALTERNATIVE COMMUTE
PROGRAM
Dear Ms. Kalkin:
It has come to our attention that Britannia Oyster Point (Slough Estates) is
submitting a report to the City of South San Francisco regarding their
Transportation Demand Management (fDM) efforts at the project. As a long time
tenant, Rigel, Inc. would like to offer a summary of our successful experience with
the TOM program that was implemented.
Prior to Rigel's move into the campus in 2003, Slough Estates provided dedicated
TOM support and training, and hosted a pre-move transportation fair to highlight
various alternative commute options and ridesharing opportunities for our
employees. After occupancy, we have enjoyed on-going support from the TOM
representative on our behalf.
We are pleased to report that Rigel exceeds the City's 35% alternative mode-use goal
according to our 2005 survey results indicating a 36.3% rate. Our comprehensive
employee commute program includes the following benefits:
. Free guaranteed ride home program
. $120 monthly allowance for carpooler, bicyclists and walkers
. $120 monthly, pre-tax subsidy for transit riders and vanpoolers
. Free Downtown Dasher noontime rides
. In-house employee transportation coordinator and intranet commuter Web
site
. Free BART and Caltrain shuttles
II80 Vele....ns Boulev;ud
SOlllh San Fr:lndsco. CA 94080
M:lin Phon,,: 650.624.1100
Fa,,: 650.624.1 lei
ww,v.rigclxolll
/C_
. Free bicycle lockers and showers and clothes lockers
We are delighted with the Ri@el alternative mode-use activities of our employees.
Currently we are tracking 57 Yo (more than 85 people) of our workforce who are
successfully taking alternative transportation. Employee participation and
commitment has positively impacted company recruitment and retention efforts
and has improved the work/lite balance for many users.
Rigel commends Slough Estates for their support and successful efforts to build
tenant/ employer awareness and provide th.e on-site infrastructure necessary to
accomplish TDM implementation.
Sincerely,
.&!?~tH;(~
Richard Ross
Executive Director of Human Resources
c: Jon M. Bergschneider, Slough Estates
BRITANNIA OYSTER POINT
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The goal of the Britannia Oyster Point Commute Program is to promote transit
and alternative commute options for the tenants/ employers and employees
working throughout the Britannia Oyster Point complex. This effort is designed
to reduce employee-parking demand, enhance participation in rideshare
programs, and implement a comprehensive Transportation Demand
Management (roM) program. The roM program will ultimately achieve a 35%
employee alternative mode use rate as required by the City of South San
Francisco.
The principles guiding the roM program provide positive benefits for employee
recruibnent, retention, productivity, air quality improvements, and alternative
mode usage.
Employers are encouraged to participate in these collaborative efforts with
transportation and rideshare organizations to provide employee outreach and
education. Other resources such as those from the Regional Rideshare Program
511, Caltrain, the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance), BART,
and SamTrans enhance the roM program.
Some of the services provided to employers and employees include individual
on-site company presentations, carpool permit sign-ups, bicycle locker
registrations, annual Spare the Air Transportation Fair, annual on-line commute
survey, employee information brochure and targeted outreach marketing.
The overall objective is to reduce vehicle trips to the Britannia Oyster Point work
site by 35%.
I
I
I
I
I
I
'H' L..' I~ r \f'~' Co I
L _,--)11 .
Tr an::;port,1 tion,
l\ if QUality,
Lll1d U<'C,
Pl~lnning,
_ 1)C\'(.lopnWnl,
&
CommlUllt\'
!~f'lJ lions
[iI-,n 1 Sin:,,!
Sll!t...' .~J4
S.)(y,Hl1t'nhl, CA
'}:;~I-l
IOu,: 'J").-- ~-ls 2Hil
Lt:.:: 'Fl6 ~A 5:;l):;
h"vr,-.,.;i'l h..1 10'" tr:l. ill'll
January 3, 2006
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ms. Susy Kalkin
Principal Planner
City of South San Francisco
315 Maple Street
South San Francisco, CA 94083
RE: 2005 EMPLOYEE COMMUTE SURVEY
BRITANNIA OYSTER POINT SUMMARY
Dear Ms. Kalkin:
We are pleased to submit a summary of the 2005 Britannia Oyster
Point Employee Commute Survey results. This summary meets the
roM monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in the
2000 Bay West Cove TDM Plan.
During the week of October 31, through November 4, 2005, the
Britannia Oyster Point Commute Program conducted a survey
encompassing 575 employees throughout the campus. This survey
summary reflects responses for all campus employees (five tenant
groups).
The purpose of the Britannia Oyster Point survey was to provide
annual documentation of TDM accomplishments and meet the City
of South San Francisco's reporting requirements. In addition,
survey results provide a snapshot of current alternative mode use
levels. Highlights of the survey results include:
. Survey response rate - 73.4%
. Alternative mode use range - 25.7% to 35%
. Single occupant vehicle (SOV) respondents who would consider
using an alternative occasionally - 75.3%
. Employees who commute outside peak morning hours -16.2%
. Employees who commute outside peak evening hours - 32.5%
The 2004 Employee Transportation Survey conducted by the
Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance) identified the
San Mateo County alternative commute rate at 32%. The overall
commute rate for the City of South San Francisco was identified at
26.2%. Incorporating survey methodology used by the Alliance, the
Britannia Oyster Point project has achieved the required 35%
alternative mode use goal. However, the Oty requires the Britannia
Oyster Point project to use the Bay West Cove methodology which
dictates that non survey participants be counted as SOY drivers and
consequently reflects an alternative mode use rate of 25.7%.
-
Ms. Susy Kalkin
January 3, 2006
Page 2
Slough BrC, LLC/Britannia Oyster Point continues to provide significant annual
funding - in excess of $70,000 - towards the San Mateo Caltrain/BART shuttle
program and its on-site TDM services. Program components include a
designated commute coordinator, a comprehensive commute website
(www.BOPcommute.info). a BOP Rideshare Brochure, and employee outreach
and marketing promotions. Employee responses received from the 2005 survey
'will also provide the ability to direct targeted marketing to employees for their
specific request or commute needs.
The aggregate efforts of the Britannia Oyster Point commute program in tandem
with the individual tenant-employers programs will continue to maintain the
alternative 35% commute mode usage goal.
A copy of the 2005 survey results and graphics are enclosed for your review.
Please contact me at (916) 448-2440, or at [email protected], should you
have any questions regarding this report. We would be delighted to meet with
you and the Planning Commission to highlight the successes of the Britannia
Oyster Point commute program.
Sincerely,
.....e /J. -/ JL--r kl. .qltRJ
UI,s-;alU.fl .r-. ( ~o
Elizabeth 1. Hughes
TOM/ Transportation Manager
Enclosure
C Michael Lappen, City of South San Francisco, w / enclosure
Jon M. Bergschneider, Slough BTC, LLC, w /0 enclosure
Ann Nelson, Britannia Management, w /0 enclosure
Luis Bayol, Amgen, SF, w / enclosure
Richard Ross, Rigel, Inc., w / enclosure
Glynis McCray, Raven Biotechnologies, Inc., w / enclosure
Wendy Hoyt, w /0 enclosure
-
2005 BRITANNIA OYSTER POINT COMMUTE SURVEY
October 31 - November 4,2005
Cumulative Results Summary
1. How many miles from work do you live?
0.0 - 0.9 miles 1
1.0 - 2.9 miles 9
3.0 - 4.9 miles 8
5.0 - 9.9 miles 77
10.0 -14.9 miles 108
15.0 - 19.9 miles 68
20.0 - 24.9 miles 32
25.0 - 49.9 miles 101
50.0 -74.9 miles 8
75.0 or more miles 1
No Answer 10
2. What is your home zip code?
3. My regular work schedule:
Five da work week (full time)
Nine da s, 80 hours worked in two week eriod (full time)
Four da work week, 10 hour da (full time)
Part-time
No Answer
411
3
o
4
5
Page 1
.~
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
4. What are your typical work hours? (See Exhibit A for graphic presentation)
Before 7:00 am
7:00 am - 7:15 am
7:15 am - 7:30 am
7:30 am - 7:45 am
7:45 am - 8:00 am
8:00 am - 8:15 am
8:15 am - 8:30 am
8:30 am - 8:45 am
8:45 am - 9:00 am
9:00 am - 9:15 am
9:15 am - 9:30 am
9:30 am - 9:45 am
9:45 am - 10:00 am
After 10:00 am
17
30
18
21
30
66
41
62
68
29
18
7
7
7
10
13
10
5
26
45
43
51
54
63
21
27
21
11
4
6
5
6
GI The Hoyt Company
Page 2
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
5. How did you get to work each day? (See Exhibit A for graphic presentation)
o
1
3
3
Total Surve 423
Total Number of Alternative Mode Users 150 154 150 145 141 148
% of Surve Alternative Mode Users 35.5% 36.4% 35.5% 34.3% 33.3% 35.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.6%
1.6%
100.0%
*Note: Assumes that all non survey respondents are drive alone (SOV)
6. If you currently use public transit to get to work, which option(s) do you use? (See
Exhibit A for graphic presentation)
Caltrain
Shuttle bus (Caltrain, BART)
BART
SamTrans
Sah Francisco MUNI
Other
AC Transit
Dumbarton Ex ress (DB)
Santa Clara Valle Trans ortation Authori
78
69
49
11
7
5
1
1
1
,-
ID The Hoyt Company
Page 3
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
7. If you normally choose alternatives to driving alone, what motivates you to make?
Save cost, wear & tear on ersonal vehicle
To hel im rove our air uali
Stress reduction
Commuter Check ro ram
Financial subsidies from em
Shuttle from train to work
134
124
109
74
69
59
57
49
48
37
28
21
20
17
16
12
s for commuters
8. What are the three main reasons for driving alone to work? (See Exhibit B for
marketing conditions)
An thin else takes too much time
lrre ar work schedule
No reasonable transit 0 tion
Transit/ shuttle connections don't work for me
Need to trans ort children
Cannot et home in an emer
Prefer to drive m own car
Live close to work
111
92
91
79
67
60
51
49
ID The Hoyt Company
Page 4
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
Don't like to de end u on others
Need m car at work for ersonal business
Transit costs too much
Need m car at work for lunch time tri s
on't have an one to ride with
Other
Poor bic
Need m
Safe concerns
Poor bicycle and pedestrian facilities (parking,
lockers, showers, etc.)
46
38
37
36
28
21
16
9
7
2
9a. If you normally drive alone, would you consider using an alternative transportation
method? (See Exhibit A for graphic presentation)
Yes 229 (75.3%)
No 75 (24.7%)
9b. If yes, what modes would you be most likely to use?
-
Commuter train/ ex ress bus:
Cool
Shuttle (Please s
Bic cle
SamTrans Bus
Van 001
Telecommute
MUNI Li ht Rail
Other
alk
VT A Bus
VT A Li ht Rail
108
86
56
40
19
18
17
13
13
5
3
2
Caltrain
BART
AC TransBa Ex ress (M-Line)
Dumbarton Ex ress (DB)
95
31
1
o
m The Hoyt Company
Page 5
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
-
Britannia ster Point Caltrain shuttle
Britannia 0 ster Point BART shuttle
Utah-Grand Caltrain shuttle
Utah-Grand BART shuttle
Downtown Dasher - Free Midda
10. What would encourage you to use an alternative to get to work, other than driving
alone?
Em 10 er financial subsid or increased subsid
Express shuttle from South San Francisco Caltrain station
directl to Britannia 0 ster Point
Guaranteed emer enc ride home
Hel findin cool/van 001 match
Other
Abili to telecommute
Safe, convenient bike aths and routes
Carshare vehicle available for occasional ersonal use
Express shuttle from South San Francisco BART station
directl to Britannia 0 ster Point
Flexible work schedule
On-site services and amenities to reduce after work and
lunch-time errands
More stable hours
Prizes, drawin s, etc. for ridesharin commuters
Lunchtime shuttle from Britannia Oyster Point to downtown
South San Francisco
WiFi access on transit
Other station shuttle
Secure, convenient bic cle arkin
Shuttle from other train/light rail station directly to Britannia
Oster Point: (Please s ecif )
1m osed arkin fees
Chan e in work shift
Loaner bike ro am
Showers and clothes lockers
Reduced vehicle arkin (fewer
63
62
50
43
40
38
35
35
29
28
22
21
17
15
14
9
9
6
5
5
4
3
Page 6
ID The Hoyt Company
2005 Britannia Oyster Point Commute Survey
January 3, 2006
12. Please indicate which, if any, services you would like to obtain further information.
Pre-tax subsid 90
On-site exercise facili 90
Commuter Check 83
On-site ATM/bankin 77
Guaranteed Ride Home am 66
Shuttle from train station 62
Bike routes 61
Public Transit 0 tions 58
On-site convenience store 48
EroP~ ~
Wa e Works 41
S are the Air romotions ro ram 39
Telecommutin 31
511 Ridematchin assistance 30
Peninsula Traffic Con estion Relief Alliance 23
Bike racks /lockers 21
On-site d cleanin services 19
Other 8
511 on-line bike artner matchin 6
Do you want to be entered in the prize drawing?
Yes 388 (93.7%)
No 26 (62.8%)
ID The Hoyt Company
Page 7
Exhibit A
2005 DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIT USE
----.
SamTrans (7.4%)
San Francisco MUNI (4.7%)
Golden Gate Transit (0.7%)
AC Transit (0.7%)
Dumbarton Express (DB) (0.7%)
Santa Clara Valley (VTA) Bus (0.7%)
2005 OFF-PEAK ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES
"
Arrivals (after 9:00 a.m.): Departures (after 6:00 p.m.):
III 16.2% 1_ 32.5%
WOULD YOU CONSIDER AN ALTERNATIVE TO DRIVING ALONE?
SOY
Respondents:
~
m The Hoyt Company
Page 2
I'"
Exhibit A
TYPICAL DAILY COMMUTE MODE USE COMPARISONS
2004
2005
Alternative
Modes:
17.3%
28.2%
SOY:
81.9%
69.8%
= Alliance Methodology D = Bay West Cove Methodology
r"
35.0%
25.7%
64.1%
73.6%
2005 DISTRIBUTION OF ALTERNATIVE MODE USES
Other*:
Carpool:
Transit:
Bicycle:
Van pool:
Walk:
I"'"
* Motorcycle, Telecommute. etc.
Note: Alliance Methodology
20.57%
12.86%
0.66%
0.57%
0.19%
0.14%
m The Hoyt Company
Page 1
Exhibit B
Marketing Conditions Affecting Transportation Options
and Transportation Demand Management Choices
2005 Commute Impacts
A significant factor impacting Britannia Oyster Point commuters in 2005 was the sharp
increase in the price of gasoline and it's effect on the cost of driving to work. More than
31.7% of survey respondents said they were motivated to use an alternative
transportation mode to "save cost, wear and tear on personal vehicle".
The 2004 Employee Transportation Survey, conducted by the Peninsula Traffic
Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance), identified the San Mateo County alternative
commute rate at 32%. The overall commute rate for the City of South San Francisco was
identified at 26.2%. Incorporating survey methodology used by the Alliance, the
Britannia Oyster Point project has achieved the required 35% alternative mode use goal.
Britannia Oyster Point does charge tenants for parking. However, no tenant-employer
charges employees for on-site parking privileges. The employers pay employee parking
fees and costs for employees.
Caltrain services were enhanced in 2004 to add express trains during peak hours.
However, this service does not provide an express stop at the South San Francisco
Caltrain Station and hence does not benefit employees at Britannia Oyster Point.
Off-Peak Usage
Off-peak commute schedules provide some congestion relief for more than 16% of A.M.
and 32% of P.M. Britannia Oyster Point employees. The nature of biotech business
environments contributes to off-peak commute travel. These non-traditional work
schedules necessitate off-peak commute travel, and eliminate many transit or
carpooling options. Variable work schedules often require employees to drive alone to
meet time and project commitments at work. Transit, shuttle service, carpool and
vanpool commute options maintain set and regular schedules that do not easily
accommodate off-peak travel.
Having an irregular work schedule was the number two reason employees drive alone
to work. This was the same response as in 2004.
Successes
Efforts to reduce drive-alone choices and increase commute options have been a
priority for one tenant in particular. Rigel, Inc. has aggressively enhanced their
employee commute program in 2005 with an increase in transit subsidies to $120 per
month, a pre-tax option for transit riders and $120 commute allowance for bicyclists
and carpoolers. Amgen SF will be making some commute program enhancements in
2006. The aggregate efforts of the Britannia Oyster Point commute program and tenant-
employers have established an alternative commute mode usage range of 25.7% to 35%.
m The Hoyt Company
January 3, 2006
Slough
Estates
Please take the
Britannia Oyster Point
Commute Survey today!
11 4 A.i~.-tJ ~
.~www.BOPCommuteSurvey.org
PRIZES TO WIN
--
JUST FOR TAKING THE SURVEY FOR COMMUTERS,
YOU CAN ENTER TO WIN FUN PRIZES.......
Fall is here and we will be giving away prizes to make your days a little brighter.
-
Prizes
(1) iPod nano (2GB:500 songs) - courtesy of Britannia Property Management
(1) iPod nano (4GB:1,000 songs) - courtesy of Britannia Property Management
(2) 10-ride tickets - courtesy of Caltrain
(2) $48 gift certificates for BART - courtesy of Britannia Oyster Point
Commute Program
(20) $7 Gift Certificates for various downtown South San Francisco restaurants
_ courtesy of Britannia Property Management
(10) Spare the Air Backpacks - courtesy of the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District and the Spare the Air Program
(1) $25 Border's Gift Card - courtesy of the Peninsula Traffic Congestion
Relief Alliance
-
..... - ,
Britannia
Oyster Point
I
.
"qv~ you cQmpif?ted your c(!~mutlfr su,rvf!Yyet? .';
... ""'~' ',;,:'" ,.',;* :;'~::'~;~~i,:: q,
"j ''''CfJj';'~ ~.;.4, 'i,{", '"::,.w'."" :..;"~ ;,/,: p.:;; l~'1J,;;. ~
,,,,,;;';;" '.' ~,~";'~~ A~ c.
;6~
<r
.... :t: ':~
-
-
-
~-
~oo
rIJ.....
~O
= =
~(JQ
~=-
~
'\
(lc=
o 111
= = to
~ =.=
to = ~
OOo~
~~ ~
< ~ to
tOtO-..
~111~
~ ~tO
o Q
Q.. ... .
~w. = =
~~
....
~
---...
r'-
~~
:~
~
~
~
~
~
~
/1
.~
l~
~
~
~
~
.~
~
~j
~
~
I r
~
'~
J
r'
r
ANNOUNCING
NEW ASF EMPLOYEE
ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL MODE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
TUESDAY - AUGUST 29
TRANSPORTATION & COMMUTE EVENTS
11:30 am to 1:00 pm - cafeteria, Building 1
and
1:45 pm to 3:00 pm - ASF20, 2nd floor in the
.
mezzanIne area
You are invited to the ASF Transportation & Commute Events
on Tuesday, August 29, 2006.
NEW ASF Alternative Travel Mode Incentive Program includes:
o $50 taxable Carpool Incentive
o $50 taxable Vanpool Incentive
o $50 taxable Transit Incentive
o $50 taxable Bicycle Incentive
o $50 taxable Walk Incentive
o FREE Guaranteed Ride Home program
o FREE Ridematching Assistance for carpoolers, vanpools and
bicyclists
o FREE noon-time Downtown Dasher
Personnel will be on-hand to answer questions and provide
program details.
AMGEN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL MODE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
POLICY GUIDELINES
The goal of the Amgen South San Francisco Alternative Travel Mode Incentive
Program is to reduce the number of drive-alone commuters and vehicles parked at on-
site facilities. For employees who use an alternative commute option (transit,
car/vanpool, bicycle, walking, or any combination, etc.) at least 60% of their workweek,
the ASF Alternative Travel Mode Incentive Program provides monthly:
o $50 taxable Transit Incentive
o $50 taxable Vanpool Incentive
o $50 taxable Carpool Incentive
o $50 taxable Bicycle Incentive
o $50 taxable Walk Incentive
o FREE Guaranteed Ride Home program I
TRANSIT INCENTIVE
The Transit Incentive offers regular employees a $50 monthly Amex gift card for those
who use a transit commute option at least 60% (at least 3 days per week) of their
workweek. This incentive is considered taxable income and is provided to the employee
ill arrears.
Program Implementation
Step 1: Register for the monthly transit incentive in AFS Human Resources
Step 2: Pick up your Employee Transportation Benefit Form
Step 3: Track and log your commute activities for the month
Step 4: Return your completed Employee Transportation Benefit Form to Human
Resources and the end of each month
Step 5: Receive a $50 Amex card and pick up another Employee Transportation Benefit
Form for the next month
Eligibility
Transit Incentive eligibility is monitored and audited on an ongoing basis. Eligibility
requirements include:
· Employees who use a transit commute option 60% of their workweek, or at least
three (3) days per week
I The ASF free guaranteed ride home program supports all alternative commuters in the event of a mid-day
emergency. This FREE cab service applies if you become ill or your carpool or vanpool partner(s)
becomes ill, or there is a problem at home or school/daycare, etc. Please contact AFS Human Resources
for more information about this free program for non-drive alone commuters.
ASF Transportation Policy. doc
08/24/06
CARPOOL AND V ANPOOL INCENTIVE
The Carpool and Vanpool Incentive offers regular employees a $50 monthly Amex gift
card for those who carpool or vanpoo1 at least 60% (at least 3 days per week) of their
workweek. This incentive is considered taxable income and is provided to the employee
III arrears.
Program Implementation
Step I: Register for the monthly carpool or vanpool incentive in AFS Human Resources
Step 2: Pick up your Employee Transportation Benefit Form
Step 3: Track and log your commute activities for the month
Step 4: Return your completed Employee Transportation Benefit Form to Human
Resources and the end of each month
Step 5: Receive a $50 Amex card and pick up another Employee Transportation Benefit
Form for the next month
Eligibility
Carpool and vanpool Incentive eligibility is monitored and audited on an ongoing basis.
Eligibility requirements include:
· Employees who carpool or vanpool with one or more Amgen employee, or
o one or more employee working at the Britannia Oyster Point campus
(Rigel, Raven, Receptor BioLogix, or MDS Sciex), or
o one or more employee within a 3 mile radius of the Amgen worksite
· Employees who carpool or vanpool 60% of their workweek, or at least three (3)
days per week
· Employees who carpool or vanpool must have matching or similar work
schedules with their rideshare partner(s)
· Employees who carpool must have matching or nearby ZIP codes with their
rideshare partner(s)
· Employee carpools or vanpools are defined as adult employees who share a ride
to work. Infants and children will not be considered carpool partners in this
employer program
· Employees who carpool or vanpool include riders and drivers
Carpool or vanpool parking spaces are provided in the front of Britannia Oyster Point
buildings and in the garage.
Carpool and vanpool matching assistance can be found in the 511 Rideshare page at
http://www.511.orgl or contact the Britannia Oyster Point Commute Coordinator at BOP
Commute Information [email protected].
ASF Transportation Policy.doc
08/24/06
CYCLISTS/ WALKER INCENTIVE
The CyclistlWalker Incentive offers regular employees a $50 monthly Amex gift card
for those who bicycle or walk to work at least 60% (at least 3 days per week). This
incentive is considered taxable income and is provided to the employee in arrears.
Program Implementation
Step 1: Register for the monthly cyclist/walker incentive in AFS Human Resources
Step 2: Pick up your Employee Transportation Benefit Form
Step 3: Track and log your commute activities for the month
Step 4: Return your completed Employee Transportation Benefit Form to Human
Resources and the end of each month
Step 5: Receive a $50 Amex card and pick up another Employee Transportation Benefit
Form for the next month
Eligibility
CyclistIW alker Incentive eligibility is monitored and audited on an ongoing basis.
Eligibility requirements include:
· Employees who bicycle or walk to work 60% of their workweek, or at least three
(3) days per week
,--..
FREE employee bicycle lockers are provided in the garage at the Britannia Oyster Point
campus. Please visit http://www.bopcommute.info/to download and submit a bicycle
locker application.
Bicycle Buddy matching assistance, route mapping and resources can be found in the
Bicycling page at http://www.511.org/ or contact the Britannia Oyster Point Commute
Coordinator at BOP Commute Information [email protected].
ASF Transportation Policy.doc
08/24/06
10 Facts About Amgen So. SF Commute Program
Pre-tax Payroll Deduction for Commuter Check transit vouchers (in
ASSF Human Resources) - Good for SamTrans, BART, Coltrain,
Dumbarton Express, Muni, VTA, AC Transit, Golden Gate Transit
and vanpool fares.
~;~~~~~~~~~~*~~~,~~W~~~~:~~~:~~:9:~~f;'.'~~{:?0;~~~
RE E'<Jr:'S,q, "'"t" ""'-h.n'1'",...~,..t." """ihttl"" f""~'"""o'
:;, ' " :r,,;~~, ,s ,er;i)F;Oln~'fU eS~.om:~
. }.\<;';7;.".<;!;', . ~,,,;;,~,tt.;~' -:!X.., .'f',;' I',""':"""\':,f~ - ',< &-j.:;"~~):;';.;;.:-.~1< _ ~~:: _.'c ";,',;":;::"i&;~-_>-:t ',,,"<;,:~~'.i;"V_"'-",,
"', "!c"'''CI%B'~' ffi..$f.'''''.w.I('''''''"'.'''''''.... .>).,;,..,w,". f,.N.~,,..'"
~~fI"f~JJi;l~lC/,~~~, . ~'s'~;;9
FREE Trial transit passes available to new riders (1 BART ticket, 3
round-trip Coltrain tickets, 3 round-trip SamTrans or Dumbarton
tickets OR 3 round-trip VTA tickets) - register at www.commute.org.
',4''''-i1f~ ~:_~~:~_;'F~
a'sri(1'cfrfa~!'6t ,
~lR;:lg,mID:~~~$}~g;~~~'..
Preferential carpooljvanpool parking spaces (11 on-site spaces and
20 garage spaces). Sign up for carpool parking permits with Human
Resources.
Secure bicycle storage (4 racks and 2 enclosed lockers) and showers
and clothes lockers. (See ASSF Human Resources for bicycle locker
keys) .
FREE lunch time shuttle - Downtown Dasher (see ASSF Human
Resources for free cab voucher)
Amgen So. San Francisco Employee Commute Coordinator: Christine Sarmiento
[email protected] I 224-2450
Pre-tax Payroll Deduction for Commuter Check
transit vouchers
Cash and other incentives and rebotes for
carpools and vonpools via www.commute.o~
SEE BACK FOR DETAILS
r
r'
r'
OJ
Amgen So. SF Emergency Ride Home
Program
Pick up an Emergency Ride Home (ERH) Voucher from Christine Sarmiento in
Human Resources (Building B) if you need an emergency ride home and you
used a commute alternative to get to work. Commute alternatives include
biking, walking, carpooling, vanpooling, or riding transit.
Valid reasons for using the ERH:
· sudden illness of self or immediate family members or carpool partner
· home emergency
· eldercare or daycare emergency
· transit vehicle breakdown
· theft of bicycle
· unscheduled needs of service overtime
Destinations that constitute a valid use of an ERH voucher would include an
employee's home, hospital, daycare or eldercare facility, park and ride lot, etc.
An ERH Voucher may NOT be used for planned appointments (e.g. doctor or
dentist, etc.), business related travel, personal errands, missed your ride home,
natural disaster, or job related injuries.
Taxi Cab Ride Option: Employee must give the cab driver a signed ERH
Voucher before the ride is started, and the taxi ride must be 25 or less miles from
work site. Employees do not pay anything at the time of the ride and are not
required to tip the driver. (Special consideration will be made for longer cab
rides for those unable to rent a car due to sever illness.)
Rental Car Option: Employees may use this option for any length trip
beyond 25 miles in a mid-sized car within the State of California for a period of
time not to exceed 24 hours for a fixed cost not to exceed $50.00. This trip
includes: free pick-up and delivery services, unlimited mileage, applicable taxes
and insurance coverage (liability insurance, collision damage waiver, and
supplemental liability protection and Personal Accident Insurance (PAl). Each
employee must give the rental car agency a signed ERH Voucher and an Amgen
So. SF code # . Employees pay nothing for rental. The ERH Vouchers
are merely an alternative payment method. Employees using the rental car option must
act on their own accord, sign a standard rental agreement with Enterprise Rent-a-Car at the time
of rental, show a valid driver's license and provide a personal credit car number for collateral
before the car is taken. The employee is responsible for all costs and liabilities incurred after the
24-hour rental period covered under this program.
Telephone numbers for these companies are listed on th~ ERH Voucher. Pick up
your ERH Voucher and code number from Christine Sarmiento (244-2637 or
[email protected]) in Human Resources (Building B).
H,
L.[
rf~
~
~
~
r'
RIGEL, INC. CARPOOL ALLOWANCE PROGRAM
POLICY GUIDELINES
The goal of the Rigel Inc. Commute Program is to reduce the number
of drive-alone commuters and vehicles parked at on-site facilities.
Employees who carpool at least 600/0 of their workweek may register in
Human Resources for a Rigel Carpool Allowance. The Carpool
Allowance provides employees who carpool with a $120 monthly cash
subsidy. Carpool registration is required annually.
r"
Eligibility requirements for the carpool allowance include:
Carpool and Receive Monthly Cash Allowance. $120 monthly carpool
allowance is available for those who carpool at least 600/0 of their
workweek (least 3 days per week). Eligibility is monitored and audited
on an ongoing basis.
Step 1: Visit the Human Resources office and ask for a Carpool
Registration and Permit Application.
11 Employees who carpool with one or more Rigel or other Britannia
Oyster Point employee as least three (3) days per week must have
matching or similar work schedules to be eligible for the $120 monthly
cash allowance.
r-
" $95 carpool allowance for employees who carpool with one or more
carpool partner who are not Rigel or other Britannia Oyster Point
employees but do work within a 3 mile radius of the Rigel worksite.
Step 2: Use your Rigel Carpool permit on days you and your carpool ~
partner share a ride to work. The Carpool permit allows parking in
specially marked preferential carpool space in the front of the building
or in the garage. If you did not commute with your carpool partner,
you may not park in a preferential carpool designated parking space.
Step 3: If you or your carpool partner(s) experience a shift or job
change that alters your ability to carpool, you must change your
carpool status in Human Resources and alter your parking and
allowance registration.
Step 4: At the end of each month, fill out your monthly tracking form
and return it to Human Resources along with your travel expense
claim for your $120 (or $95) allowance (allowances are considered
taxable income).
Note: Carpools are defined as adult employees who share a ride to
work. Infants and children will not be considered carpool partners in
this program. Eligible carpools must commute within at least a three-
mile radius or each other's worksite.
~
Parking will be appropriately enforced.
~
r
. ' - - . .
. ~ ',. -1. k, ~ : .. ...:~~
, 'f~t~~.
COMMUTE R -1'.- G :;E L PROGRA~-.'~
., -_ ~ r _ (:_: r
11 Facts About the Rigel Commute Program
1. fi9mm~lej.:. !1srtiM 0~,caH :1~flnLQt.i~li~ - Monthly transit riders,
carpoolers, vanpoolers, bicyclists and walkers. Contact Christine for
more information at 624-1388 or [email protected].
2. FREE Oyster Point Shuttles for Caltrain and BART. See kiosk in
cafeteria for shuttle schedules.
3. FR"EE Guaranteea-Ride Hon1e Progran1 for alternative conunuters iQj
the event of an en1e!g~ncy. Contact Christine for n10re inforn1ation]
4. On-site discounted transit Commuter Check sales in the Human
Resource Office.
5.
FREE Trial transit passes available to new riders (1 BART ticket, 3
round-trip Caltrain tickets, 6 one-way SamTrans tickets, 6
Dumbarton tickets OR 3 round trip VTA tickets) - register at The
Alliance at www .commute.org
r
6. Incentives and rebates for carpools and vanpools
(www.commute.org)
7. Preferential carpool/ vanpool parking spaces (16 on-site spaces and
28 garage spaces). See Christine for permit applications.
8. FREE ridematching assistance through www.511.org to help find
carpool and vanpool partners.
9. Secure bicycle storage (4 racks and 4 enclosed lockers) and showers
and clothes lockers. See Christine for locker applications.
10. Commute options website: www.cOn1l11ute.org and
www.bOpC01l1111ute.info (download carpool permit or bicycle locker
applications).
11. Free lunch time shuttle - Downtown Dasher
March 2006
~
~
.~
Jon Rllbin, Chair
Sm l-'raJM,,:iK(.I.\bror',,~ Appt\inlt.~
Joh" l\-1tLrmore, "'ice Chair
uti\;:> ..,; Sant".a Clara C.m:nry
Tom AII1'111,iu.ml
C..lt}"1.nd Co'Ul~ ,)f San FrllnO:I.>O.
1m", L. .-fllden""
Clti<< o.f Corm:) COil:! Coumy
To", A~.,,,,b"""o
u.s, O~p3crnu~n( oi H()uiiutr
..\1\\1 \ 'rban O,'\'dopmtnt
Jam" 1: Btall Jr.
Santa C"Ju-a C.ounlY
&b BIn".bard
St-'n(llU~ Cowur land C:IOI:~
iHork D.Swlt;"
'.(JOln. (;Qit.t (;,.tUllh'
/liIJ Ootid
).'ap:1COunr:'::lllot<:i:i....
Dor~ne ~1,f. (;;lUOpiH;
~. Oep:lHltl~UllJfTf)n..:rOrr-.!Dtin
.';,,,<1 Hagg"'ty
.-\.blllo.:.J c..Unl,"
Ann. II'. Hn/sud
S..n Fl".LJ1i.l~t:O 1J;l\" (' ..on.~l"".nu)u
~mt fk~,tklP.ll1"~'\ CmUmf"l<",
Sm', Kjm'Y
\t:.rio COlllltr .and C;bc",
Sue /.I",pcrt
Otin o;S'1n ,\h.rc.."l Coullt~
Bijun Sal'tipi
Slue B'.Iw:lt,,-SS, Trar.<;p.vul~1
.ul.lI":)1"IR~ .~::Il~'Y
Jum" P. SprriH.t
'>oJ.:Jm) C.llUmi' ..r.d (:t\;~;
Adriemle J. 'li.rsUr
~n .\bh.~ ,"Olin!}
Pmnekt TorJiQlt
"\.i.~hC1arit)l\ f)t" U.r .\r.;a Gt,)'-''''rnnl~n~
Sh.liII Young-
C.hi!!i 1)1" :\Jalno:Ja Coun~...
Stn.. Hemin.~
f.JleC1lrin~ ))irei."Olr
Ann FJemer
---.- ~curi"e OireCf(JI. O).'crotDUns
Andrn&- Frrrniw
[)eput,., ~a\"C DlT~cl"lv.
R~' ,,-\te.l Toll AudwrWi
'l"hrn!s~ W. .\lft:1\1illan
\>epuq.- F.lCh~Ufi"'e Dire-nul. l'olac}"
e
METROPOLITAN
Jos~ph P. Ron ~ IetmCentcr
I Q I Eighth Street
Oakland, C-\ 9-M07-4700
TEL 5\ll.R17.i700
TTrlTl>D 510.817.5769
F;\X ;(0.817.5848
E..,\t-\IL [email protected]\'
\\'EB WWW.Il1IC.ca.gO\
TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
August 8, 2006
Mr. Richard Ross
Sr. Director, Human Resources
Rigel, Inc.
1180 Veterans Boulevard
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Dcar Mr. Ross:
As you mayor may not know, Ms. Elizabeth Hughes nominated you and the
Rigel Employee Commute Program for MTC's 2006 "Excellence in Motion" awards
program. The biennial awards recognize innovations that improve the transportation
network, activities that encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation,
educational efforts, exemplary volunteers as well as exceptional transportation
employees. Approximately 70 nominations were submitted this year, representing a
wide range of individuals, organizations and projects that positively impact the Bay
Area's transportation network.
We appreciate the work that your nomination represents, however it was not
chosen for an Excellence in Motion award this year. A six-member jury consisting of
transportation experts ~ representing business, media, the public, the Commission and
MTC staff-reviewed the nominations. While your nomination was not chosen for an
award, please accept the enclosed certificate in appreciation of your contributions to
the transportation sector.
An Excellence in Motion awards ceremony will be held the morning of Oct. 25th
at the Ferry Building in San Francisco, Port Commission Hearing Room, Second Floor,
One Ferry Building, San Francisco. You will receive an invitation to the event; while
you will not be personally recognized at the event, I hope you can attend. I also would
encourage you to participate in future MTC awards programs. Quality nominations such
as yours have helped to make this program a success for almost 30 years. If you have
any questions, please contact Pam Grove, public information officer, at 510.817.5706 or
by email at<[email protected]>.
Sincerely,
~~~:;~ J-
/ t::7
Randy Rentschler
Director, Legislation and Public Affairs
--,
cc: Ms. Elizabeth Hughes
Enclosure
-
~ SCIEX ALTERNATIVE COMMUTE PROGRAM
Science advarn;in9 health
10 Facts About MDS Sciex's Alternative Commute
Program
1. FREE Guaranteed Ride Home Program for alternative commuters in
the event of an emergency (valid for users of transit, vanpools,
carpools, bicyclists, roller bladers and those who walk to work).
2. 100% Transit subsidy and pre-tax Payroll Deduction for Commuter
Check transit vouchers (in Human Resources) - Good for SamTrans,
BART, Caltrain, Dumbarton Express, Muni, VT A, AC Transit,
Golden Gate Transit and vanpool fares.
3. FREE Oyster Point Shuttles for Caltrain (picks up at OP driveway)
and BART (picks up on-site at OP).
-
4. FREE Trial transit passes available to new riders (1 BART ticket, 3
round-trip Caltrain tickets, 3 round-trip SamTrans or Dumbarton
tickets OR 3 round-trip VTA tickets) - register at www.commute.org.
5. Cash and other incentives and rebates for carpools and vanpools via
www.commute.org.
6. Preferential carpool/vanpool parking spaces (11 on-site spaces and
20 garage spaces). Sign up for carpool parking permits with Human
Resources.
7. FREE ridematching assistance through www.511.org to help find
carpool and vanpool partners.
8. Secure bicycle storage (4 racks and 2 enclosed lockers) and showers
and clothes lockers. (See Human Resources for bicycle locker keys).
9. FREE Commute assistance website: www.commute.org.
10. FREE lunch time shuttle - Downtown Dasher (see Human Resources
for free cab voucher)
--
~
ram ~'
~
10 Facts About Receptor BioLogix's Commute Program
1. FREE Guaranteed Ride Home Program for alternative commuters in the
event of an emergency (valid for users of transit, vanpools, carpools,
bicyclists, roller bladers and those who walk to work - see Human
Resources for free cab voucher).
2. FREE Oyster Point Caltrain Shuttle (picks up at OP driveway) - see
www.commute.org for schedules.
3. FREE Oyster Point BART Shuttle (picks up on-site at OP) - see
www.commute.org for schedules.
4.
FREE Trial transit passes available to new riders (1 BART ticket, 3 round-
trip Caltrain tickets, 3 round-trip Sam Trans or Dumbarton tickets OR 3
round-trip VTA tickets) - register at www.commute.org.
--
5. Cash and other incentives and rebates for carpools and vanpools via
www.commute.org.
6. Preferential carpool/vanpool parking spaces (lIon-site spaces and 20
garage spaces). Sign up for carpool parking permits with Human
Resources.
7. FREE ridematching assistance through www.511.org to help find carpool
and vanpool partners.
8. FREE secure bicycle storage (4 racks and 2 enclosed lockers) and showers
and clothes lockers (download locker registration forms at
www.bopcommute.info).
9. FREE Commute assistance website: www.commute.org or www.511.org.
10. FREE lunch time shuttle - Downtown Dasher (see Human Resources for
free cab voucher).
-
http://www.bopcommute.info/
BOP Commute - Welcome
911/06 2:43 PM
',+'RldeSliare,'Y~,' ~,,,..,.'~:~i;,,,>,,
,. Ii- " ,
,,~,:F)'eei~~nnec onSr'''':~'
, . ,
~/rrans ~PrOvi ers';':~}'>"
I.' '.." ...,*.
'.+. Omo:tuter. ~esourCes :!"',
FREE Full-Day Transit Commutes
Win a Trip to Costa Rica!
Win $100 or $1.000 for Carpooling
About BOP Commute
The goal of the Britannia Oyster Point Commute Program is to promote transit and alternative commute options for the tenants!
employers and employees working throughout the Britannia Oyster Point complex. This effort is designed to reduce employee
parking demand, enhance participation in rideshare programs, and implement a comprehensive Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) program. The TDM program will ultimately achieve a 35% employee alternative mode use rate as required by
the City of South San Francisco.
The principles guiding the TDM program provide positive benefits for employee recruitment. retention, productivity, air quality
improvements, and alternative mode usage.
Employers are encouraged to participate in these collaborative efforts with transportation and rideshare organizations to provide
employee outreach and education. Other resources such as those from the Regional Rideshare Program 511, Caltrain, the Peninsula
r"raffic Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance), BART, and SamTrans enhance the TDM program.
Some of the services provided to employers and employees include individual on-site company presentations, carpool permit sign-
ups, bicycle locker registrations, annual Spare the Air Transportation Fair, annual on-line commute survey, employee information
brochure and targeted outreach marketing.
The overall objective is to reduce vehicle trips to the Britannia Oyster Point work site by 35%.
For more infornlation, or assistance, please contact Elizabeth Hughes at [email protected]
02004 Britannia Oyster Point I Click here to e-mail us. Home
r-
http://www.bopcommute.info/
Page I of 1
f'
Free ... ~ \
~co.Okies..,..............~... '''_..'~. ""....~"~..... >:'A' '!If lfIlID"'~'1;"""..1;,., ill' .' ,~,,:,~~.'.....,~ ..
", "~: ".: " r ~,~ ~,,!)'t;~:,;'''i ' ; ":., ~' ," ,
.rt:~'l'RAN:Sr'<;iJ!TA'F~~~\ F.N'liI{' ) ImrOve
l ",: }~~: P~~~~~~~e~;~~t~2g~lI!lce ," ~ r co~~;ute
~\ r y ~ ~, (be~eeiiAmgen SF,'and jligel) '.,
~ Learn abou/;' 11:00 ~.m.tol:OO p.m. l; , , ~ ifi ,<
~ ~ ~
Transit and 'if}~'
t>P[~
Free Shuttles
,,~'
'p,r
. .:..y ~,'
','; i'..
~~-i
r--
r
· · Ca,/A
,,00/
Find a carpool
partner
Guaranteed
Ride Home
Program
and Free
Downtown
;_:pqshf![
..-:i ~~,,;:: ,~' h~ ':_ .>,'"
BRITANNI ~~
~STER POINT ',~' Talk to
~ Transportation
~ Experts
("b
.r~&iv,:t~
. ~;.A
f'~c~,
AA
if
"''i)~'iie--'
IT, ~.~
~ ~ ~,~~tt:
~. "~1; :'f;,j? ~?
~.::~':: ,~' ,~
::"
~; ,'.,
,~ ~;~'
,~~
'f-"J
r
r- ;"
'T1
:::a
m
m
n
o
o
2S
m
en
r
"tJ
m
z
-
z
en
c
!; '.
-I'
~
'T1
'T1
0'.
n
O.
z
G')
m
en
-I
o
Z
::0
m'
C
m
'T1
r~
)>
z
n
m
, ~t/
-I
;;ol\)~
)>0-
Z ~ :;:0_- fg
~ en d)l'~
o "tJ ~ t=
:::tJ )> en ~
~~ t-31 I
::!-t ~~
~~ ~Z
,,)> oZ
)> - I I I I
_;;0 Z>
:::tJ t-3
m
<
m
z
-I
en
C5
z
)>
G')
m
f'
r
r
n
)>
r-
-t
~
Z
)>
Z
c
en
)>
s:
-t
~
Z
en
-I
~~~
Zo~ -~
U1 ~- m
~ en d)l'~
0"" ~~
~)> CI)~
>~ ~ I I
:::! -I ~ ~
fiffi ~ z
"T1 )> 0 Z
)> _ I I I I
_;;0 Z >-
~ ~
r
r'
r
o.
)>
r- .;;
-f'
~.
-'
z
-
OJ.
)>
:::c
-f
en
:I:
c:
=1
r-
m
m
z
-f
m
:::c
."
:::c
en
m
~
o
m
en
:I:
)>
:::c
m
." '. ~r
. z'
, ;. ."
o
o
ill r-
..'.
,~. ".;,.
G)
c:
)>
~
Z
-f
m
m
o
~
o
m
:I:
o
s:
m
r---
r
T
T R
I T
TRY A TRANSIT COMMUTE TO
BRITANNIA OYSTER POINT
Would you like a free trial,
roundtrip transit pass?
FREE trial transit passes are available to new
riders who wish to try:
· BART (one $9 BART ticket)
· SamTrans (six one-way tickets)
· Caltrain (three roundtrip tickets)
· VTA (three roundtrip tickets)
· Dumbarton Express (six one-way tickets)
· M Line (six one-way tickets)
r
Sign up today to receive your free transit
pass and try a transit commute to work.
*Please return completed form to Human Resources
COMPANY
LOCKER NO.
Britannia Oyster Point
BICYCLE LOCKER REGISTRATION
Do you Rideshare? 0 Yes 0 No
(To qualify for the Rideshare program you must rideshare a minimum of 3 days per week if full-time or 2 days per week if part-time.)
Ridesharing includes all types of commute alternatives (train, bus, light rail, carpool, van pool, bicycle, walk, roller blade, scooter & telecommuting)
o Train
o Light Rail 0 Vanpool
o Telecommute
o Bicycle 0 Walk
o Other
(Please Identify)
o Roller blade/Scooter
If yes, which type?
o Carpool 0 Bus
How many days per week?
IN THE EVENT OF AN EMPLOYEE EMERGENCY (AT WORK, HOME, DA YCARE OR SCHOOL) A FREE RIDE HOME, VIA CAB
OR A 24-HOUR CAR RENTAL, WILL BE PROVIDED TO EMPLOYEES WHO RIDESHARE THREE (3) DAYS PER WEEK OR
MORE. SEE YOUR HUMAN RESOURCE REPRESENTATIVE FOR A CAB VOUCHER.
_ Enclosed bicycle lockers are available to employees who bicycle to Britannia Oyster Point. Regular bicycle commuters, you are eligible
.0 register for a bicycle locker. These lockers are located in the parking garage and require individual locks.
Registration is required.
Name of cyclist
Bldg.
Ex!.
Dept.
Place of employment
Address
Phone
Type or description of bicycle:
Questions? Call Britannia Property Management
(510) 273-3186
(4/28103) DISTRIBUTION: White. Company; YeUow. Britannia Property Management. Pink - Employee
D s your job located in an East of Highway 101 business park
in South San Francisco~ Do you utilize public transportation
or have limited options for travel to Downtown South San
Francisco during the lunch hour? Why not try the "Downtown
Dasher" taxi service?
This FREE service picks you up between the hours of 11 a.m. and
2 p.m. from your workplace, and drops you off at one of two
drop-off locations in the downtown area of South San Francisco.
All that is required to take advantage of this service is a
"Downtown Dasher" taxi voucher and a trip reservation.
Contact Karen Sumner, Territory Manager with the ALLIANCE at
650-588-8170 or [email protected] to get your vouchers.
Once you receive the voucher, call 650-588-2131 by 10 a.m.
the morning of the trip to make a reservation. A return reser-
vation is made as well. Once the taxi arrives, the driver collects
the appropriate portion of the voucher and you're off. Just sit
back and enjoy the ride. It's that simple.
Visit Downtown South San francisco and enioy
numerous restaurants and shops.
Receive discounts from these downtown merchants. Just show
them your Downtown Dasher Voucher and mention this ad.
MERCHANT
ADDRESS
Bacchanal Restaurant
Cecella's Restaurant &
Pizzeria
Galli's Sanitary Bakery
Hot Shots Gourmet Coffee
and Tea
Makin' Waves Salon
265 Grand Ave.
113 Grand Ave.
324 Grand Ave.
219 Grand Ave.
341 Baden Ave.
Morning Brew Coffee Co.
Western States Bank
713 Linden Ave., Ste. A
225 Grand Ave.
Downtown Dasher is a joint program of the Peninsula
Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance, the City of South
Son Francisco and the South Son Francisco Chamber
of Commerce.
.
PENINSULA
TRAFFIC
CONGESTION
RELIEF
ALLIANCE
The program is supported in port with grants from
the Transportation Fund for Cleon Air, the City/
County Association of Governments of Son Mateo
County, the San Mateo County Transportotion
~ Authority ond the South San Francisco Economic Redevelopment Department.
1150 Bayhill Dr.. Suite 107
San Bruno, CA 94066
-"-__'1_.'"-__.....-_._~,___>~ _---.::~
www.commufe.org )
----<=
DISCOUNT
Hors d'euvres and beverages at Happy Hour Prices
10% off one purchased meal
10% off any purchase
50% off all drinks (up to a $5 value)
10% off retail purchase
Buy one specialty coffee at regular price. and get one
of e ualllesser value FREE
Free Checking - No Monthly Service Charge
LEGEND
@ BACCHANAL RESTAURANT
@> CECElIA'S RESTAURANT & PIZZERIA
@) GALLI'S SANITARY BAKERY
<9 HOT SHOTS GOURMET COFFEE AND TEA
<0> MAKIN' WAVES SALON
e MORNING BREW COFFEE CO.
<iJJ WESTERN STATES BANK
TAXI DROP-OFFS
-tJ GRAND AVE. & LINDEN AVE.
it! 733 AIRPORT AVE.
.,,-,
BAY WEST COVE
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Prepared for:
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
and
HINES INTEREST AND SLOUGH ESTATES
Prepared by:
III
THE HOYT COMPANY
Originally Submitted: June 28, 2000
Revised: July 20, 2000
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 1
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................. 1
Bay West Cove Location Map .......................................... 2
Hines Interest Site Map ............................................... 3
Slough Estates Site Map ............................................... 4
2.0 EMPLOYEEMODESPLITEASTOFHIGHWAYI0l....................... 5
3.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT ........................................... 5
Graph of Employee Mode Split ......................................... 6
4.0 TRANSIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7
Transit Services Map .................................................. 8
5.0 DESIGNATEDCARPooLSPACES/PREFERENTIALPARKING........... 10
6.0 ON-SITE PROJECf AMENmES ....................................... 10
7.0 PERSONALIZED CARPOOL MATCHING /V ANPooL ASSISTANCE ..... 12
8.0 GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM ............................... 12
9.0 BICYCLE STORAGE FAOLITIES/BICYCLE MAP ....................... 12
Bike Trail Map ...................................................... 13
10.0 TRANSPORTATION COORDINATORS ................................ 14
11.0 TELECOMMUTING ................................................. 15
12.0 FLEXIBLE WORK HOURS ............................................ 16
13.0 KICK-OFF EVENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16
14.0 ANNUALREPORT.................................................. 16
15.0 CONCLUSION ..................................................... 16
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Traffic congestion and air pollution are critical concerns in maintaining a healthy
economy and lifestyle in the City of South San Francisco. Traffic congestion
results in time lost to residents and commuters, and increased demand on City
fiscal resources for roadway construction and maintenance. Mobile sources (the
automobile) account for 50% of the air pollution in South San Francisco.
The City of South San Francisco has directed the two developers of the Bay West
Cove area, Hines Interests and Slough Estates, to work together in the
preparation of a single, master planned Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) Plan. This comprehensive Plan is designed to achieve a 35% alternative
mode use which will address both traffic and air quality concerns in South San
Francisco.
The Plan includes 11 measures and an annual monitoring program. The Plan has
a variety of infrastructure and incentive based measures which encourage all
forms of alternative mode use: carpool/vanpool, transit/ shuttles, bicycling,
walking, and telecommuting.
Perhaps the most important measures are those related to project parking. Both
projects have agreed to modest parking levels with Hines Interest providing 15%
less parking for their office development (2.8/1,000 sq. ft.) than City code and
Slough Estates committing to building no more than code (3.3/1,000 sq. ft.). Both
developers have agreed to charge at least $20 per month for parking which is
precedent setting for this part of the City.
The reduced parking levels and paid parking will help significantly to dampen
demand for single occupancy vehicle (SOV) use. The additional measures such as
shuttles, carpool spaces, showers and bicycle facilities, and incentives including
transit pass subsidy, and the Guaranteed Ride Home program will provide
employees with viable alternatives to the SOV.
This Plan is performance based. The developers are required to achieve a 35%
alternative mode use by tenant employees. Annually the mode use will be
monitored and a report must be submitted to the City's Economic Community
Development Director by December 1st of each year.
IIJrhe Hoyt Company
Page i
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
INTRODUCTION
In the Bay Area the hours of delay experienced by drivers is projected to increase
another 249% by the end of the year 2020)
The Bay West Cove projects support the City of South San Francisco's policy of
focusing clustered aeve10pment along transfortation corridors. These projects
are located near and served by Highway 10 and I-380, a Caltrain station, and
SamTrans bus stops.
The comprehensive plan of trip reduction measures identified in this report is
essential to realizing the trip reduction potential of the Bay West Cove projects.
The combination of these cntical factors will provide the synergism to maintain a
35% trip reduction level for this project.
Through monitoring efforts such as the annual survey of employees to
determme transportation mode split, Bay West Cove will be able to oetter focus
transportation coordination efforts and encourage tenant employees to use
alternative transportation. The modal split survey results will be submitted to the
City of South San Francisco on or before December 1st of each year.
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Bay West Cove project includes 20 acres owned by Hines Interest, and 22
acres owned by Slough Estates.
The Bay West Cove projects proposed by Hines Interests and Slough Estates are
mixed use projects which by their design will help to reduce automobile trips.
The 20 acre project by Hines Interests is planned to include a 350 room hotel,
approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of retail space including a sit down restaurant, a
small general store or sundry shop, A TM and other support retail, and 600,000
sq. ft. of Class A office space. The Slough Estates development will include
600,000 sq. ft. of office/R & D (of which 10,000 sq. ft. is support retail/ restaurant).
The Slough Estates project will also complete a portion of the San Francisco Bay
Trail and provide a 100 foot buffer between the trail and the development which
will include outdoor seating and picnic areas.
The projects will be designed to maximize opportunities for pedestrian and
bicycle connectivity. A separate project, the Gateway project located directly
across Oyster Point Boulevard includes amenities such as a par course, a
sandwich shop and a privately operated full service cafeteria (not open to the
public) which may be available for use by the (Hines) Bay West Cove tenants.
By the end of summer 2000, another sandwich shop called "Specialties" will be
open to the public.
The development is intended to be as self sufficient as possible in order to reduce
the number of trips made daily to and from the campus.
1 California Transit, November 1999, page 28.
m The Hoyt Company Page 1
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
LOCATION MAP
July 20, 2000
II The Hoyt Company
Page 2
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
SITE PLAN - HINES INTEREST
m The Hoyt Company
. .
July 20, 2000
Page 3
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
SITE PLAN - SLOUGH ESTATES
*To Be Provided By Applicant
July 20, 2000
m The Hoyt Company
Page 4
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
2.0 EMPLOYEE MODE SPLIT EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
The table on the following Rage indictes that somewhere between 23% to 29.5%
of employees working in the City of South San Francisco commute to work
using some alternative form of transportation, largely via carpooling or public
transit.
The 1990 U.S. Census data indicates a 77% singe occupany vehicle (SOV) usage
and 23% alternative mode usage. The 1998 surv~y conducted by the Pennisu1a
Congestion Relief Alliance (PCRA) shows a 31.3% alternative mode usage. For
purposes of this TDM Plan, the authors asssumed the U.S. Census data was likely
the better reflection of mode split due to a larger sample size, and the fact that a
more recent survey in the Gateway area indicated a 7% shuttle / transit usage
which is closer to the Census figure.
Therefore, this TDM Plan will need to generate an increase in alternative modes
of approxiamte1y 35% to 40% over the baseline conditions.
3.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT
Parking Supply/Reduction
Total parking spaces projected for both projects at full build-out is approximately
4,313. Total paiking spaces by project are estimated at 2,100 and 2,213 for Hines
Interest and Slougn Estates respectively. For the Slough Estates project, on-site
structure parking will be 1,511 parking spaces with surface parking at 702
spaces. Structured parking for the office portion of the Hines Interest project is
approximately 1,000 spaces with surface parking at 800 spaces. Hotel parking is
estimated between 300 and 350 spaces.
The ability and willingness to rideshare is directly linked to parking availability.
By not providing an overabundant supply of parking spaces at full build out, Bay
West Cove is laying the groundwork for successful promotion of alternative
transportation. Preferential parking spaces placed near the building entrances are
an excellent incentive and sends a clear visual message to employees and the
community that alternative transportation is important.
The City parking code for office is 3.3/1,000 sq. ft. Hines Interest is proposing a
2.8/1,000 sq. ft. parking ratio. The Slough nstates' current proposal is for
3.3/1,000 sq. ft. The single greatest influences on mode of transportation are
Rarking pricing and the availability of parking. Other similar developments in
the City of South San Francisco have successfully implemented parking at
3.1/1,000 sq. ft. and we encourage Slough Estates to modify their parking to
3.1/1,000 sq. ft.
m The Hoyt Companyd
Page 5
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
Model Shares of South San Francisco Employees
and North San Mateo County Employees
Transportation Mode - Share % 1990
Other 1. %
Walk 1.5%
Bicycle .5%
Bus and Rail 4.0%
Carpool/Vanpool16.0%
Drive Alone 77.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Model Shares of South San Francisco Employees
and North San Mateo County Employees
Drive Alone
Carpool IV anpool
Bus and Rail
Bicycle
Walk
Other
Transportation Mode
Share % 1990 Share % 1998
1 * 2**
77.00% 70.50%
16.00% 15.80%
4.00% 14.10%
0.50% included in other
1.50% included in other
1.00% 2.40%
*1. People employed in South San Francisco; may live in the City or elsewhere
**2. Survey of South San Francisco employees by the Multi-City TSM.
Source: U.S. Census, 1990; 1990 CTPP Statewide Element, Part C; PCRA
3 South San Francisco General Plan, pg 137, October 1999.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 6
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
Paid Parking
To encourage alternative mode usage, the developers of Bay West Cove will
implement an employee paid parking program for the first time in this area. The
Hines Interests developers are proposing to charge a minimum of $20 per
structured parking space per month for all employee single occupancy vehicle
(SOV) parking, ana will provide free parking for carpools and vanpools. Slough
Estates will charge a fee for both structured and surface parking (non-visitor)
through a key card and decal system. Research has repeatedly shown that the
single biggest factor in selecting a mode of transportation is the cost of parking.
ThIS is a very important measure to encouraging employees to get out of the
SOV.
4.0 TRANSIT
Caltrain and SamTrans as well as a future BART extension, all provide service to
South San Francisco in close proximity to the project site; as will a future BART
extension. SamTrans o.{'erates 7 express bus routes on Highway 101 and one
regular bus route on AIrport Boulevard that serve the Caltrain station. A.map of
rail and bus service to South San Francisco are included in this TDM Plan.
Caltrain
Caltrain operates frequent fixed route commuter rail service seven days a week
between San Francisco and San Jose, as well as limited service to and from Gilroy'
on weekdays. Caltrain operates on weekdays from approximately 4:30 a.m. until
about 1:30 a.m. and on 15 to 30 minute frequencies during the peak periods in
the morning and evening. Midday service operates approximafely every hour
and service runs about every hour between 7:00 p.m. and about midnight.
Service is less frequent on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.
Caltrain service is available approximately three-fourths of a mile from Bay West
Cove at the South San Francisco station at Dubuque and Grand avenues and can
be reached by the Oyster Point Boulevard shuttle.
BART
The Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is a 95-mile, 39-station automated rapid
transit system located along five lines of double track. Trains traveling up to 80
mph connect San Francisco to Colma and other East Bay communities-north to
RiChmond, east to PittsburglBay Point, west to Dublin/Pleasanton, and south to
Fremont. BART trains operate from 4 a.m. to midnight Monday through Friday,
6 a.m. to midnight on Saturday, and 8 a.m. to midnight on Sunday. Basic fare:
minimum $1.10; maximum $4.45 (for one-way trips). Service is scheduled eve~
15 minutes during peak periods (from the Fast Bay to Glen Park Station - 6:15
a.m. - 8:40 a.m. ana 4:25 p.m. - 6:00 p.m). Service during Holidays, Saturdays, and
Sundays are modified.
BART-to-the-Airport construction is currently underway to expand the system
by an additional 8.7 miles along the peninsula from Colma to a new intermodal
station in Millbrae. Four new stations will be created including a South San
Francisco station located between El Camino Real and Mission Road to the south
of Hickey Boulevard.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 7
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
TRANSIT MAP
.-
July 20, 2000
m The Hoyt Company
Page 8
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
SamTrans
SamTrans provides bus service throughout San Mateo County, with connections
to the Colma and Daly City BART stations, San Francisco International Airport,
peninsula Caltrain stations and downtown San Francisco.
The system connects with San Francisco Muni, AC Transit and Golden Gate
TransIt at San Francisco's Transbay Terminal, with the Dumbarton Express and
with Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority in Menlo Park and Palo Alto.
SamTrans service east of Highway 101 area is provided by one regular bus
(#292) route along Airport Boulevard. Weekday service runs every 30 minutes
during the 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and every 20 minutes during peak evening
period between 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. After 6:00 p.m. until midnight, service is
once per hour beginrung at 25 minutes after each hour. There is no regular route
service yet provided in the specific Bay West Cove area.
Downtown Dasher Taxi Service
This taxi service provides 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. pick-up service throughout the East
Highway 101 business parks in South San Francisco. Using existing shuttle stops,
taxis drops off riders at one of two drop-off locations in the downtown retail
area. The Downtown Dasher, operated by the Peninsula Yellow Cab of South
San Francisco and managed by the PCRA, requires an employer provided
voucher and a trip reservation before 10 a.m. ThIS midday service is currently
free to participating employers for the next 6 to 12 months.
Ferry Service
Currently, no scheduled water transit service exists in the Bay West Cove area.
Shuttle Service To Bay West Cove
The proposed Bay West Cove campus is approximately three-fourths of a mile
from the South San Francisco Caltrain station.
Working with the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (PCRA) the project is
proposing to implement a comprehensive shuttle system with both peak period
and lunch time service. The Hines Interest project intends to operate their shuttle
service via a private contractor. Using 47 to 55 passenger shuttle vehicles in the
a.m. and p.m. peak periods, these shuttles will circulate between the South San
Francisco BART station and the project at either 15 or 30 minute frequencies. The
project will also operate 30 minutes frequency shuttle service between the South
San Francisco Caltrain station and the project in the a.m. and p.m. peak.
To compliment these peak period shuttles, the project (Hines Interest) is
proposing to encourage tenants through marketing and PR to participate in the
Downtown Dasher lunch time shuttle as an alternative to employees ~etting into
their cars at lunch time. The shuttle operates on an on-call baSIS between
downtown South San Francisco (and potentially other locations) and the project.
This pilot service is currently free but requires a reservation. Within the next 6 to
12 months the service will require employer participation in a voucher
m The Hoyt Company
Page 9
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
system supported by the City of South San Francisco, East of 101 Employers,
and the merchant's association.
Transit Subsidy Program/Commuter Check
A transit subsidy of $25 per month will be offered to the tenant employees of
Bay West Cove (to a maximum of 10% of employees). The subsidy will be in the
form of Commuter Check vouchers and can be redeemed to purchase tickets for
Caltrain, BART, and SamTrans bus services.
Transit pass subsidies by employers of as little as $15 per month have shown a
63% increase in monthly pass sales in other jurisdictions.
5.0 DESIGNATED CARPOOL SP ACES/PREFERENTIAL PARKING
One effective means of encouraging employees to rideshare and I or use clean
fuel vehicles is to reserve the most preferred parking spaces for the exclusive use
of carpools and vanpools. These preferred parking spaces would be designated
with signage and pavement striping.
Upon completion of this project, a minimum of 10% of employee surface and
structure parking will be designated for carpool, vanpool, and clean fuel vehicles.
Bay West Cove will provide these spaces in premium, convenient locations (i.e.,
near parking garage elevators, close to buildings, in the shade, etc.). Flextime
commuters would have access to remaining spots and all other parking will be
open to visitors after 9:30 a.m.
6.0 ON-SITE PROJECT AMENITIES
On-site amenities provide employees with a full service work environment.
Eliminating the need for an automobile to make midday trips increases non-
drive alone rates. Many times employees perceive that they are dependent upon
the drive alone mode because of the number of errands and activities that must
be carried out in different locations. By: reducing this dependence through the
provision of services and facilities at the work site, an Increase in alternative
mode usage for commute-based trips should be realized.
Automatic Teller Machine
Bay West Cove will provide an automatic teller machine (ATM) on-site and
located in a central location. This will better enable employees commuting via
alternative modes of transportation to complete banking transactions on their
lunch hour or break without needing an automobile to make an off-site trip.
On-Site Child Care
The project will include on-site child care as an employee amenity. The demand
for child care may likely be greater than supply, therefore the project will use
this project component to further attract employees to alternative modes of
transportation. Employees will fill out a verification form to participate in this
program. A special aspect of this child care service will be that priority access will
be given to those employees who commute via an alternative mode of
m The Hoyt Company
Page 10
Bay West Cove TDM Plan
July 20, 2000
transportation (an alternative mode use employee will be placed at the top of
any waiting list). Employees who commute to work via singfe occupancy velUcle
(SOV) will be given a lower priority on the waiting list.
This measure is subject to environmental sign-off on child care use on this site by
the Regional Water Quality Board (RWQB); if not approved by the RWQB, the
child care will need to be located off-site.
This child care commuter link has proven to reduce commute-based SOV trips to
work-sites nationwide. This important link allows for increased carpooling
among employees and families which significantly decreases regional congestion
and improves non-drive use to the work-site.
Parents with responsibility for child care transportation are 50% less likely to ride
public transit than those who do not need to take their children to day care.
According to Caltrans, the typical one-way child care trip is four miles in length
resulting in 2,000 extra miles traveled per person per year, and 85 pounds of
pollutants. Caltrans states that 20% of working women and 5-10% of working
men have child care transportation responsibilities. If those women and men are
to be persuaded to use alternative modes of transportation, then on-site child
care is necessary.
Electric Vehicle Charging
The parking structures will be wired with the necessary conduit to support a
minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations each.
Shower and Clothes Lockers
Showers and clothing lockers will be installed to facilitate employees walking and
biking to work for those who wish to change after commuting via alternative
transportation. Two (2) showers and 20 locker facilities will be installed in each of
the buildings for every 500 employees.
The showers will be centrally and conveniently located near bicycle storage
facilities. In the case of the Class I bicycle parking which will be contained in the
structured parking, via lockers or an enclosed cage with key or keypad access,
the showers may be located one to four minutes away by foot.
Information Kiosk
An information kiosk(s) will be located internal to each of the buildings in a
common ~athering area, such as cafeteria. The kiosk(s) will contain
transportation information, including project shuttles, SamTrans, Caltrain, BART,
Downtown Dasher, RIDES for Bay Area Commuters, Inc. and other related
information. Information will be updated periodically by the Transportation
Coordinator.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 11
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
7.0 PERSONALIZED CARPOOL MATCHING AND V ANPOOL ASSISTANCE
Bay West Cove's Transportation Coordinator will establish a Personalized
Matching Assistance (PMA) program for employees. Employees will be given a
list of fellow employees who live in the same general area, who travel to work at
the same time and would be willing to carpool. The Transportation Coordinator
(TC) will assist B(.lY West Cove's employees with carpool formation. This can be
done through RIDES for Bay Area Commuters; Bay West Cove supplies the
application, which is then sent to RIDES and SMARTPool for vanpooling
coordination.
A vanpool .{'rogram will improve the parkin!? situation on the site, since a
vanpool vehlcle can accommodate 10 to 12 indiVIduals. Vanpooling helps reduce
stress to the commuter and can save time and money. RIDES for Bay Area
Commuters will assist in all aspects of setting up a vanpool program for Bay
West Cove.
8.0 GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM
One of the primary reasons commuters refuse to gy carpooling or public transit
is the loss of the ability to leave work unexpectedly due to an emer!?ency or the
fear of being stranded should they have to work late. Employers In Southern
California and Seattle who have guaranteed their employees a ride home in the
case of an emergency or havin~ to unexpectedly work late have found it a
tremendous incentive to get employees to lry ridesharing and get them to stay
in a ridesharing program.
An attitude survey of 1,650 employers in Southern California showed that a
Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program was the number one incentive for
employees to rideshare. A similar survey in Seattle, Washington, showed that
having access to a GRH program was an important factor for 70% of those who
chose to rideshare ana was an important factor for 50% in continuing to
rideshare.
9.0 BICYCLE STORAGE FACILITIES/BICYCLE MAP
Free Class I and Class II bicycle parking facilities will be provided on site as
follows:
.
Commercial, R&D, and office uses: one bicycle space for every 50 vehicle
spaces required for employees.
Restaurants, retail: one bicycle space for every 50 vehicle spaces required.
.
All bicycle parking and facilities shall be located in convenient, safe and well-lit
areas with maximum space for ingress and egress of bicycles. The project has
outstanding connections to regional bicycle facilities, specifically the San
Francisco Bay: Trail. The Bay Trail is a network of multi-usefathway,s circling San
Francisco and San Pablo Bays. Approximately 150 miles 0 the traIl is complete.
The ultimate route is planned to be a 400 mile route through nine Bay Area
counties and 42 shorefine cities. The trail JJrovides commuters an exceptional
pathway to bicycle or walk to work at Bay West Cove which has a direct linkage
to the Trail.
A map of surrounding bikeways will be included in the TDM Plan.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 12
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
BIKE MAP
m The Hoyt Company
Page 13
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
The GRH program provides the employee with a security blanket, a feeling of
reassurance that if a child becomes ilf or injured during the day the employee can
get to them quickly. If an employee has to work late and misses tneir bus or
carpool, or if their vanpool breaks down, they are guaranteed a ride home.
Employers in Southern California have shown an increase in ride sharing of
15-20% when a GRH program is available to employees.
10. 0 TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR
Ms. Lisa Burke will be the Hines Interests Transportation Coordinator for the
Bay West Cove project. The Slough Estates Transportation Coordinator for the
Bay West Cove J?,roject has yet to be identified. Ms. Burke and the Slough Estates
Coordinator wIll work with designated tenant contacts to coordinate the
transportation programs.
Bay West Cove will designate a Transportation Coordinator whose
responsibility includes the shuttle, transit pass subsidy, and all Rideshare and
Spare the Air programs. The Transportation Coordinator will have duties and
primary responsioility: for transportation demand management (TDM) issues
and for implementing this TDM Plan.
The Transportation Coordinator duties will be filled by:
Name:
Hines Interest
Ms. Lisa Burke
Slough Estates
To be determined
Address:
101 California, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94111
33 West Monroe Street, Suite 2000
Chicago, IL 60603
E-mail:
Phone:
(415) 982-6200
(312) 558-9100
The Transportation Coordinator(s) (TC) will provide the following services and
functions:
1. Catalog all existing incentives that encourage employees to utilize
alternative transportation programs and aggressively market programs
to employees.
2. Develop and maintain liaison with employees, neighboring employment
centers, regional and local ridesharing programs.
3. Coordinate and manage various aspects of the TDM Plan that require
periodic update or monitoring, such as carpool and vanpool registration,
parking assignment and enforcement, (locker assignment and
enforcement and flextime work schedules).
4. Coordinate the transportation needs of the project with other area
III The Hoyt Company
Page 14
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
5.
projects, specifically related to alternative modes of transportation such as
vanpooling.
Provide information and resource materials on the full range of
transportation choices available to employees of the development.
Provide up-to-date transit information.
Provide direct on-site sale or disbursement of Commuter Check.
6.
7.
8.
Provide information to bicyclists regarding desi~nated bike routes in the
Bikeways Master Plan, and on-site support facilities.
Post informational materials, specific to commute alternatives, via e-mail
and lobby posting.
Conduct an annual survey of employee commute methods and submit
summarized results to the South San Francisco Economic and Community
Development Department as part of the annual reporting process.
Evaluate survey results for alternative transportation potential.
Encourage flextime and other work schedule adjustments to
accommodate employee's chosen alternative mode.
Designated Employer Contact
9.
10.
11.
12.
To ensure that the TDM Plan is implemented by the tenants, language will be
included into all of the tenant leases. The lease language will be worded similar
to: "Traffic: Tenant hereby agrees to designate one of Its employees to act as a liaison
with Landlord (see section 9.0) to facilitate and coordinate such programs as may be
required by governmental agencies to reduce the traffic generated by Bay West Cove as
required by the City of South San Francisco as part of conditions of approval and to
facilitate the use of public transportation."
New Tenant Employee Information Packet
At the time of move-in all tenants will distribute an Employee Transportation
Information Packet to all employees commuting to the Bay West Cove site. This
packet will include (but not be limited to) information about the c~ool parking
program, SamTrans, Caltrain, BART and shuttle schedules and maps, and a
Bicycle map.
11.0 TELECOMMUTING
Telecommuting reduces both traffic and the need for employee parking.
The Bay West Cove project is located near major fiber optic lines. At a minimum,
conduit and necessary fufrastructure will be available for future tenants to link to
these lines. While fiber optic wiring does not directly result in fewer vehicle trips
to the site, it does prOVIde the infrastructure necessary for a future tenant to
implement a telecommute program that could result in fewer vehicle trips.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 15
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
Hines Interests has entered into a strategic alliance with a "broad band"
company to provide a full range of services including: video conferencing,
satellite capaoilities, maximum broad band width capaoility allowing for dual
downloadmg and video view simultaneously, and remote server access for
greater telecommuting access. This state of the art technology will allow easy
downloading of major files such as CAD files, lengthy: legal documents, and
operating multiple programs at the same time. They will have satellite capability
to encourage wIreless telecommunications.
12.0 FLEXIBLE WORK HOURS
A flextime window allows employees to arrive at and leave work outside of the
traditional hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. This policy allows flexible schedules for
ridesharing purposes and helps reduce traffic congestion by flattening out the
peak period. On-going promotion of this program is necessary to continually
attract alternative transportation commuters.
13.0 KICK-OFF EVENT
Upon 50% of the tenant occupancy of each of their portions of the Bay West
Cove project, Hines Interests and Slough Estates will host a commute alternative
kick-off event I celebration. Transportation service providers, such as SamTrans,
Caltrain, and RIDES for Bay Area Commuters, Inc., will be invited to set-up
exhibit booths. To encourage participation in the event, Hines Interests and
Slough Estates will provide food, such as popcorn, hot dogs and refreshments,
and give-a-ways, such as commuter mugs, water bottles, t-shirts, etc. Hines
Interest and Slough Estates will set the date for the event and advertise the event
at least two weeks in advance.
14.0 ANNUAL REPORT
An Annual Report will be a critically important part of a monitoring process to
determine the success or failure of TDM measures. This report, via results from
an employee survey distributed and collected by the employee Transportation
Coordinator, will provide quantitative data (e.g., mode split) and qualitative data
(e.g., employee perception of the alternative transportation programs). This data
may then be used to focus TDM marketing and the efforts of the Transportation
Coordinator. TDM programs could be retooled, if necessary, to maintain Bay
West Cove's 35% total trip reduction commitment at the site.
The Annual Report will be submitted to the City of South San Francisco on or
before December 1st each year.
15.0 CONCLUSION
The Bay West Cove developers are committed to achieve and maintain a 35%
employee alternative mode use at their proposed projects. This TDM Plan, which
provides the detail of their commitment, is the most aggressive TDM Plan ever
filed with the City of South San Francisco.
By balancing air quality with economic growth, Bay West Cove will help South
San Francisco thrive as a community. It is projects like these that will contribute
to South San Francisco's livelihood.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 16
Bay West Cove TOM Plan
July 20, 2000
The Bay West Cove project supports the policies of focusing clustered
development along transportation corridors (Highway 101 and 1-380), and
transit corridors (Caltrain and SamTrans).
In order to be part of the transportation solution, Bay West Cove is proposing a
master planned camfus which contains the density and critical mass necessary to
encourage the use 0 all alternative modes of transportation including bicycling,
carpooling, vanpooling, and public transit. It must maintain the currently
proposed mix of office uses, recreational facilities, and food services. It must also
work closely with SamTrans, Caltrain, and BART to maximize employee
ridership on bus and rail.
With this TDM Plan and annual monitoring, Bay West Cove is committed to
support alternative transportation and to a 35% employee alternative mode
usage.
m The Hoyt Company
Page 17
r
q
ORDINANCE NO. 1300-2001
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAYI'ER 20.120, TRANSPORTATION
DEMAND MANAGEMENT, TO THE SOUTII SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE
r
WHE1EAS, on January 4, May 17, July 19, 2001, and August 2, 2001, the Planning
Commission ~leld duly noticed study sessions and public hearings to consider the Transportation
Demand Management (fDM) Ordinance; and,
I
WHE~AS, the South San Francisco General Plan's Transportation Element Policy 4.3-
1-8 states thatlthe city adopt a TDM program or ordinance; and,
i
WHEfEAS, since 1998, the City has been working with a transportation consultant to
prepare a. deprlled traffic study for the East of 101 Area, including the preparation of a
comprehensif and enforceable TDM program; and,
!
~AS, staff reports, dated May 17, 2001, July 19,2001, August 2, 2001, August
30,2001 and ~eptember 26,2001, incorporated herein by reference, were prepared for the City's
review, at th~ Planning Commission and City Council, which reports describe and analyze the
Transportatio, Demand Management (fDM) Ordinance; and,
I
;
WHEREAS, on August 2, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council adopt the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance but eliminate the availability
of reduced and paid parking as means for achieving alternate mode compliance; and,
i
!
WHEREAS, on August 30,2001 and September 26,2001, the City Council held study
sessions and public hearings to consider amending the zoning code to include the Transportation
Demand Management Ordinance; and,
I
I
~AS, the findings and determinations contained herein are based on all competent
and substanti+t evidence in the record, both oral and written, contained in the entire record
relating to thel project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and
determination$ of the City Council and are supported by substantial evidence in the record,
including the peneral Plan adopted in 1999, the staff reports and consultant reports submitted at
the Planning <Commission meetings on July 19,2001, and August 2, 2001, the staff reports and
consultant rep~rts and all testimony in response thereto, submitted at the August 30,2001, Study
Session and September 26, 2001, duly notice public hearing; and the proposed General Plan
amendment mid Supplemental Environmental hnpact report related thereto.
-
,. " r I
,.--
l:
,
or-
I
!
i
i
NOWiTHEREFORE, The City Council of the City of South San Francisco based on the
entire record khich includes, but is not limited to the Study Sessions of September 30,2001, the
duly noticed !public hearing of City Council on September 26, 2001, and staff reports and
testimony reqeived at same; the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance; the General
Plan Environtnental hnpact Report certified in 1999; the Supplemental Environmental hnpact
Report for tht Transportation Demand Management Ordinance, submitted and certified by the
City Council pn September 26,2001, including all findings made for same; and the staff reports
and testimony received at the duly noticed public hearing of the City Council on September 26,
2001; does hdreby ordain as follows:
I
SECTION 1: ! ADDITION OF CHAPTER 20.120
!
i
Chapter 20.120, entitled "Transportation Demand Management" is hereby added to the South
San Franciscp Municipal Code to provide as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated ~erein by reference.
SECTION 2: iPURPOSE
!
To implement the goals and policies established in the South San Francisco General Plan, as
amended frox{. time to time, by reducing traffic congestion at identified intersections through
implementati~n of transportation demand management programs for specified uses within the
City.
SECTION 3: : FINDINGS
i
,
;
1. The abov~ described Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance is internally
consistent with the South San Francisco General Plan.
i
I
I
Analysis: Th~ lDM Ordinance implements the goals and policies of the South San Francisco
General Plan~' dopted in October 1999. The TOM Ordinance implements Policy 2-1-4 which
requires proj ts seeking an FAR bonus to achieve a progressively higher alternative mode usage
pursuant to th lDM Ordinance. The Ordinance is also consistent with sections 4-3-1-8,4-3-1-11
and 4-3-1-12 ~hich set forth the criteria and alternative mode usage for projects subject to the
lDM Ordin~e.
2. Californi~ Environmental Quality Act:
Pursuant to ~e California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City Council
declares that I this project was analyzed in accordance with CEQA in the Supplemental
EnvironmentJ hnpact Report, 200 1. The SEIR concluded that there were no adverse effects
associated wit)l the project and identified only beneficial affects on the environment. ThelDM
Ordinance's p~ose is to reduce traffic congestion through a regulatory program consisting of
employer implemented shuttle programs; on-site amenities; reduced parking; paid parking and
other measur"cis calculated to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips. The Ordinance does not
require any n~w buildings or facilities as a result of implementation. Therefore, there are no
adverse envirdnmental impacts associated with the Ordinance.
I
,. I I' [I.'
".-.
- SECTION 4: i SEVERABll..ITY
t
I
In the even~ any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or
unconstitutio~al, such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or
portions her~f shall remain in full force and effect.
SECfION 5: : PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE
Pursuant to tIjte provisions of Government Code Section 36933, a Summary of this Ordinance
shall be prepcked by the City Attorney. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at
I
which this Orpinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the Summary,
and (2) post iln the City Clerk's Office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15)
days after the! adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2)
post in the c~y Clerk's Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the
names of tho~ City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting.
This ordinanc~ shall become effective thirty days from and after its adoption.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Introd*ced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco,
held the 26th qay of September 2001, by the following vote:
Adopt~ as an Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting
of the City Cquncil held the 24th day of October 2001:
AYES:
;
I
: Councilmembers Pedro Gonzalez, Karyl Matsumoto and John R. Penna
Mayor Pro Tern Eugene R. Mullin and Mayor Joseph A. Fernekes
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: !None.
I
ABSENT: I None.
ATIEST: 4~'HA ' t?7. ~" L..
() City Clerk
As M~or of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing
Ordinanc.lhi~ 24~ day of October 2001. rLuJli ~ ..11 ~
: l~IV;-Ma~
.. I' II
., .-
~
;1
:1
Chapt~r 20.120: Transportation Demand
Manag~ment
I
Section,:
20.120.01p Purpose
20.120.020 Applicability
20.120.030 Program Requirements and Standards
20.120.040 Required Measures
20.120.050 Additional Measures
20.120.06p Submittal Requirements
20.120.07p Review and Approval Process
20.120.080 Waivers and Minor Deviations
20.120.090 Amendments
20.120.100 Monitoring and Enforcement
20.120.110 Appeals
~ 20.120.910 Purpose
The speciflc purposes of this Chapter are the following:
A. ImpJement a program designed to reduce the amount of traffic
gen~rated by new non-residential development, and the expansion of
exispIlg non-residential development, pursuant to the City's police
power and necessary in order to protect the public health, safety
andiwelfare.
B. Ensure that expected increases in traffic resulting from growth in
em~oyment opportunities in the City of South San Francisco will be
adequately mitigated.
C. RediIce drive-alone conunute trips during peak traffic periods by
ustJig a combination of services, incentives, and facilities.
i
I
D. ProQ1ote the more efficient utilization of existing transportation
facn?ties and ensure that new developments are designed in ways to
maxjimize the potential for alternative transportation usage.
E. Es~blish minimum TOM requirements for all new non-residential
dev~lopment.
06/27/01 Chapter 20.120- Page 1
.. : I I'
F. Allow reduced parking requirements for projects implementing the
requirements of this Chapter.
G. Establish an on-going monitoring and enforcement program to
ensure that the measures are implemented.
20.1120.020 Applicability
A. ; Area. The requirements of this Chapter shall apply to all lands
I
i within the jurisdiction of the City.
B. Projects. The requirements of this Chapter apply to all non-
residential development expected to generate 100 or more average
daily trips, based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip
generation rates or a project seeking a floor area ratio (FAR) bonus.
i
20.1~0.030 Program Requirements and Standards
Schedule 20.120.030-A establishes the specific program requirements for
I
a project generating 100 or more trips or a project seeking a floor area
ratio (FAR) bonus. The required alternative mode use for all projects is 28
perce~t and applicants who propose projec. ts with increased FAR would be
requnted to increase their alternative mode use accordingly. The
requiIlements are described in the subsections below.
;
i
i
I
Schedule 20.120.030-A; Applicability of TOM Requirements
Trips Generated by RequIred Percent Annual
Project or Project Measures Alternative Survey
Requesting an FAR Mode Use
Bonus i RequIred
I
TrIennial
Report
FinancIal
Penalty for
Non-
compllanc
e
No
proJed with> than 100 Yes 28 Yes
I
average daily trip
ProJecfl requesting an Yes See Schedule Yes
FAR bohus* 20.120.02o-C
* Refer to Schedule 2O.120.3O-C for FAR bonus requirements.
I
i
;
No
Yes
Yes
A. I Required and Additional Measures. All projects generating 100 or
I more trips shall prepare and submit a Prelimimuy TOM Plan that
j includes all Required Measures and Additional Measures necessary
I to achieve a minimum 28 percent alternative mode use, as
!prescrtbed in Schedule 20.120.030-B. Refer to Section 20.120.040:
-
Chapter 20.120- Page 2
'. r I . I. ,;,
Req-.lired Measures and 20.120.050: Additional Measures, for a
description of the measures.
I
!
Schedule 20.120.030-8: Summary of Program Requirements
Additional Measures chosen by
Applicant to Meet the Required
Alternative Mode Use (at least one
measure required of all projects)
A. Alternative Commute
Subsidies/Parking cash out
B. Bicycle Connections
C. Compressed Work Week
D. Flextime
E. Land Dedication for Transit
Facilities/Bus Shelter
F. Onslte Amenities
G. Paid parking at Prevalent Market
Rates
H. Telecommuting
I. Reduced Parking
J. Other measures as determined by
the Chief Planner consistent with (B)
below
Required Measures for all Projects
Generating 100 or more trips
A. Bicycle Parking, Long- Term
B. Bicycle Parking, Short-Term
C. Carpool and Vanpool
Ridematching Service
D. Designated Employer Contact
E. Direct Route to Transit
F. Free Parking for Carpool and
'{an pools
G. $uaranteed Ride Home
H. l~formatlOn Boards/Kiosks
I. Passenger Loading Zones
J. Pedestrian Connections
K. Freferentlal Carpool and
Vanpool Parking
L Aromotlonal Programs
M. showers/Clothes Lockers
N. shuttle Program
O. T'ansportatlon Management
Association Participation
I
Pro~cts Seeking an FAR Bonus. Projects seeking an FAR bonus
shat) prepare and submit a Preliminary TOM Plan that includes all
Required Measures, any combination of Additional Measures, and
any other measures that have a demonstratable effect of reducing
the :lumber of trips generated as detennined by the Chief Planner
and as approved by the Planning Commission. Schedule
20.120.030-C prescribes the maximum allowable FAR under these
intensity provisions and Schedule 20.120.030-D prescribes the
req~ired alternative mode use based on the FAR.
!
B.
":. I. r..
Chapter 20.120- Page 3
Office
Business Commercial
Hotels
Business and Technology
Park
Coastal Commercial 0.5 0.9 1.0
Hotels 1.2 1.8 2.0
* The General Plan establishes a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) (Table 2.2-1 In the South
San Francisco General Plan). Column two Indicates the maximum floor area ratio
permitted with the TOM Bonus. Column three Indicates the maximum permitted floor area
ratio with the combined TOM Bonus and design bonuses.
SChedule 20.120.030-C: Maximum Allowable FAR
General Plan Land Use
Classification
Base FAR
Maximum FAR
with TDM
Plan"
2.3
0.9
1.8
0.9
1.0
0.5
1.2
0.5
Maximum
Permitted FAR In
the General Plan-
2.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
I
I
I
I
C. I Alternative Mode Use Required for an FAR Bonus. The
I alternative mode use required for bonus FAR under these intensity
provisions is prescribed in Schedule 20. 120.030-D.
I
t
Schedule 20.120.030-0: Alternative Mode Use Requirements for an FAR Bonus
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
i
i
,
I
i
II TDM Plans Required. Pursuant to Section 20.120.060 and Section
20.120.070, all projects shall submit a PreliminaJy and Final TOM
!
General Plan Land Use
Classification
omce
Requested FAR
1.10 - 1.59
1.60 - 1.99
2.00 - 2.30
0.51 - 0.69
Business Commercial/Coastal
Commercial or Business
Technology Park
Hotel (In either Business
Commercial or Coastal
Commercial)
0.70 - 0.80
0.81 - 0.90
1.21 - 1.49
1.50 - 1.69
1.70 - 1.80
D.
Alternative Mode
Use Required
(Percent)
30.0
36.5
45.0
30.0
32.0
35.0
30.0
32.0
35.0
Chapter 20.120- Page 4
.. I ...
,
!
i
i
I
I
Plar:l' Said Plans must demonstrate that. upon implementation. they
will ~chieve the required alternative mode use.
,
E. Guidelines. TOM guidelines regarding the range of alternative mode
use achievable from each additional measure are available from the
Plig Division.
F. Mo~itoring and Eriforcement. Projects will be monitored pursuant
to $ection 20.120.100 to ensure the alternative mode use is
achieved. Applicant shall be required, as a condition of approval. to
reirr_burse the City for costs incurred in maintaining and enforcing
the TOM program for the approved project.
20.120.040 Required Measures
All non-residential development shall implement the following measures:
I
I
I
A. Bicycle Parking, Long-Tenn. The applicant shall determine the
appropriate number of bicycle spaces based on the required
alternative mode use and subject to review and approval by the
Chief Planner. Bicycle parking shall be located within 75 feet of a
main entrance to the building and all long-term spaces must be
covered. Long-term bicycle parking shall be achieved by providing
one or more of the following measures:
1. Parking in a locked, controlled access room or area enclosed
by a fence with a locked gate.
2. Lockers.
3. Parking within view or within 100 feet of an attendant or
security guard.
B.
i
4. ! Parking in an area that is monitored by a security camera.
I
I
i
5. i Providing fixed statioruuy objects that allow the bicycle frame
I and both wheels to be locked with a bicycle-locking device or
I the bicyclist supplying only a lock and six-foot cable.
I
Bicycle Parking, Short-Term. The applicant shall determine the
appropriate number of bicycle spaces based on the required
alternative mode use and subject to review and approval by the
Chief Planner. If more than 10 short-term spaces are required at
I
Chapter 20.120- Page 5
.. I . . I.
r
;\
.1
..--
'I
I
.
;
,..~
'. I r (.
C.
I
I' least 50 percent must be covered. Bicycle parking shall be located
within 100 feet of a main entrance to the building. Security shall be
I achieved by using one or more of the same methods used for
I securing long-term bicycle parking.
I
,
I Carpool and Vanpool Ridematching Services. The Designated
I Employer Contact shall be responsible for matching potential
! carpoolers and vanpoolers by administering a carpool/vanpool
I matching application. The application shall match employees who
I may be able to carpool or vanpool.
- !
\ Designated Employer Contact. Each applicant shall designate or
require tenants to designate an employee as the official contact for
. the TDM program. The City shall be provided with a current name
and phone number of the Designated Employer Contact. The
Designated Employer Contact shall administer carpool and vanpool
I ridematching services. the promotional programs. update
I information on the information boards/kiosks. and be the official
I contact for the administration of the annual survey and 1i1ennial
I report.
i
I Direct Route to Transit. A well-lighted path or sidewalk shall be
provided utilizing the most direct route to the nearest transit or
shuttle stop from the building. Refer to Figure 20.120.040.
II Free Parking for Carpools and Vanpools. The preferential
parking spaces shall be provided free of charge.
Guaranteed Ride Home. Carpool. vanpool and transit riders shall
be provided with guaranteed rtdes home in emergency situations.
Rides shall be provided either by a transportation service provider
(taxi or rental car) or an informal policy using company
I vehicles/and or designated employees.
I
I
IIriformation Boards/Kiosks. The Designated Employer Contact
I shall display in a permanent location the following information:
'I transit routes and schedules; carpooling and vanpooling
information; bicycle lanes. routes and paths and facility information;
I and alternative conunute subsidy information.
I
I' Passenger Loading Zones. Passenger loading zones for carpool and
vanpool drop-off shall be located near the main building entrance.
!
i
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Chapter 20.120- Page 6
i
I
J. pedL_..:trian Connections. Safe. convenient pedestrian connections
sh~-be provided from the project to surrounding external streets
and. if applicable. trails. lighting. landscaping and building
orie::1tation should be designed to enhance pedesbian safety.
Pr(;~j~erential Ccupool and Vanpool Parking. Ten percent of vehicle
spaces shall be reserved for carpools or vanpools. with a minimum
of ore space required. Such spaces shall be provided in premium
and Iconvenient locations.
I
I
Pro~otional Programs. The following promotional programs shall
be promoted and organized by the Designated Employer Contact:
new tenant and employee orientation packets on transportation
alternatives; flyers. posters. brochures. and emaUs on commute
altettives; transportation fairs; Spare the Air (June - October);
=~s~are Week (October); trip planning assistance-routes and
Sho erslClothes Lockers. Shower and clothes locker fac1lities
sh be provided free of charge.
I
Shuttle Program. Establish a Shuttle Program or participate in an
exis-:1ng Program approved by the Chief Planner and subject to any
fees for the existing program.
!
Tra:'1Sportation Management Association (TMAJ. The applicant
shall participate or require tenant to participate in a local TMA. The
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance) or a similar
organization approved by the Chief Planner. that provides ongoing
support for alternative commute programs.
i
I
20.120.~50 Additional Measures
The Chief Planner and the Planning Commission shall determine the
appropriateness of each Additional Measure chosen by the applicant. See
also Section 20.120.070: Review and Approval Process.
I
Alte/mative Commute Subsides/ParJdng Cash Out. Employees
shaL be provided with a subsidy. determined by the applicant and
subject to review by the Chief Planner if they use transit or
COIIL"TIute by other alternative modes.
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
!
i
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
A.
Chapter 20.120- Page 7
i
.. I I r I ,I,
~
i!
i:
,
I
I
I
I
I
i
:. I . . : _ ~
B.
I
I Bicycle Connections. If a site is abutting a bicycle path. lane or
route according to Figure 20.120.040. a bicycle connection shall be
I provided close to an entrance to the building on the site. . .
I
I
I Compressed Work Week. The applicant shall allow employees or
I require their tenants to allow employees to adjust their work
I schedule in order to complete the basic work requirement of five
I eight-hour workdays by adjusting their schedule to reduce vehicle
trtps to the worksite.
I
I
I
I Flextime. The applicant shall provide or require their tenants to
I provide employees with staggered work hours involving a shift in the
I set work hours of all employees at the workplace or flexible work
I hours involving individually determined work hours.
!
I
C.
D.
E. Land Dedication for Transit/Bus Shelter. Where appropriate.
land shall be dedicated for transit or a bus shelter shall be provided
I based on the proximity to a transit route shown on Figure
120.120.050.
I
i
F. Onsite Amenities. One or more of the following amenities shall be
implemented: ATM. day care, cafeteria, limited food service
establishment. dry cleaners. exercise facilities. convenience retail.
post office. on-site transit pass sales.
I
G. Paid Parking at Prevalent Market Rates. Parking shall be
provided at a cost equal to the prevalent market rate. as determined
by the City based on a survey of parking in North San Mateo
I County.
i
I
H. I Telecommuting. The applicant shall provide or require tenants to
I provide opportunities and the ab1lity to work off-site.
,
i
I. Reduced Parking. In accordance with General Plan Policy 4.3-1-8.
reduced parking, consistent with projected trip reduction identified
I in the preliminaIy TOM plan. may. be permitted subject to approval
I by the Planning Commission.
i
,
J. I Other Measures. Additional measures not listed in this Chapter,
!such as an in-lieu fee that would be negotiated in a Development
IAgreement with the City. may be implemented as determined by the
Chapter 20.120- Page 8
Chief Planner and approved by the Planning Commission. Once the
Plar..ning Commission approves the Preliminary TOM Plan, the Chief
Plminer may recommend additional measures either as part of the
FincU 'IDM Plan or as part of the Triennial Review process.
i
Chapter 20.120- Page 9
. I. I.
-.
<:)
~
o
N
-
o
C"'ooI
e
::J
.ao
LC
!i~
c: .>
E ~
OJ V)
e~
c..t
E~
V)
"'C
~~
C:<(
~C1l
a..
"'C"'C
c: c:
rj rj
V) c:
(1) .-
+-I rj
:::s L.
O~
a:: rj
+-IU
.Vi
c:
~
be
c:
.p
V)
~
.
.
I
.
.
I
-..
.
" .B t-
oll " ...
~
~.
~.
I
~~
I
.....--........."......
'f" -I e .
~ . 11. ..
~ iSi.
: : -='-
Ii: ~
.
.
E9
s ;
~
!
;
. i
c c
0
.g .:=
S III
c: -
\I)
.9 \I) c
- .5
III .;
Ii) S ~
t2
. " ~ till:!
; "j) - ~ .~ i
'. .' -
/ ~ If
.. ::I
~
-' . 0#0
? E .
0"
u
c:
0
.~ u
~ J
.! ~
u ~ oil
13 u t2 ! ~
:l -= = j
..c ~ ~ ...
\I) 65 .~ ;
.~ ~ i!::
... ~ i!:: g a
~ 3 1
= ~ \I) '0
. II I I 5
.
. I
.
.
.
:
".r,- ,.~. .
"';> -. ;..
..
I.
1
~
I
I
iii:
I
I
1
,
,
~ 1
~ ,
&: 'c
J! &: III
l
<::)
~
<::i
"l
-
~~
1
<::i
"l
~
~
u:
en
Q)
'P
=
.-
u
res
LL
Q)
-
~
U
Cii
-~'n ~
. ~ : ~
'I: : .c
~ !
,
,
ffi
!
:
~ =
~ .t
~ ~
.i ~
l
!; ~
~
\,:<"i. ..
. ,
". " 0
'~>" \
\:\).
\r:.
i
\~
. ": <';St,)~':
: 1\.,:.1
. . :':'.)
.
.
-
>,
\\
(J
~ ~
~ ~
I:Q ~
l:Q
2f ~
';2 ='
;B ~
I i
u u 1
c
~ c .
.::s !
~ ~ ~ J
i:Q =
rf l:Q ~
';2 ~ ~ 1
~ .. 1
='
~ ..
I I I 8
>- ~ J
... u
, Q
,,-....
,,-.,
I.
. .
ti
20.120.060 Submittal Requirements
All p:-ojects generating 100 or more trips shall submit the following
infornation in conjunction with the development application:
A. i Preliminary TDM Plan.
1. A completed checklist of the Required Measures pursuant to
Section 20.120.040.
2. A completed checklist of the Additional Measures chosen by
the applicant pursuant to Section 20.120.050.
3. A description of how the applicable alternative mode use will
be achieved and maintained over the life of the project,
including, but not limited to, the trip reduction goals targeted
for the various TOM measures.
4.
roM Site Plan. All applicants shall submit a site plan that
designates, if applicable, TOM design elements including:
r
J '
a. External: preferential parking areas, paid parking
areas, bicycle connections, bicycle parking long- and
short-term, location of onsite amenities, passenger
loading areas, land dedicated for transit facilities and
bus shelters, direct route to transit, and pedestrian
connections.
b. Internal: showers/lockers, information boards/kiosks,
ATM, dry cleaners, day care, convenience retail, post
office, cafeteria, limited food service establishment,
exercise facilities, onsite transit pass sales.
B. Program Costs. .All projects shall be required to reimburse the City
for program costs associated monitoring and enforcing the TOM
program for the project.
20. ~20.070 Review and Approval Process
I
The r~view and approval process for this Chapter is set forth below.
i
or--
Chapter 20.120- Page 12
A. All Projects. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required for all
non-residential developments subject to the provisions of this
Chcfter.
I
i
B. Required Findings. In addition to the requirements of Chapter
20.81: Use Permit Procedure. the Planning Commission shall make
the :'ollowing findings:
I
I
I
1. ! The proposed roM measures are feasible and appropriate for
I
I the project. considering the proposed use or mix of uses and
I the project's location. size. and hours of operation; and
,
I
I
2. I Whether the proposed performance guarantees will ensure
I that the target alternative mode use established for the
I project by this chapter will be achieved and maintained.
i
C. Acr..ons By Planning Commission. Prior to approval of a Use
Pen::1it. the Planning Conunission. may:
.--
.;
,
1.
Reject the Preliminary TOM Plan based on the findings in
subsection C and require applicant to resubmit Preliminary
TOM Plan;
D.
i
,
,
I
I
2. i Approve a lower FAR bonus . based on the findings in
I subsection C; or
I
I
3. I Impose conditions that are necessary to achieve and maintain
I the target alternative mode use.
I
Fin~l TDM Plan. The applicant shall modify the Preliminary TOM
Plar_ and submit the Final TOM Plan including additional conditions
imposed by the Planning Commission as part of the building permit
process. Prior to receiving a building permit. the Final TDM Plan
shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief Planner to ensure all
conditions imposed by the Planning Conunission have been
addtessed.
20.120.080 Waivers and Minor Deviations
An applic!ant may request a waiver or minor deviation from the
requirem~ts of this Chapter. The Chief Planner shall review such
requests aPd determine whether a particular requirement is not applicable
to a particWar non-residential development or whether it may be reduced.
I
Chapter 20.120- Page 13
. I . . (. .
or an alternative and equivalent measure substituted. Prtor to approval of
a Use Permit the Planning Commission shall impose conditions that are
necessary to achieve and maintain the target alternative mode use.
I
I
I
20.120.090 Amendments
A Use Permit modification shall be required when a major change- a
change is the addition of 10 percent of the building area or a change in use
classes that triggers a 10 percent or greater increase in trips- occurs.
I
I
20.120.100 Monitoring and Enforcement
All Pigects are subject to an Annual Survey. Applicants seeking an FAR
bonu are also subject to a Triennial Report and penalties for
nonc mpliance.
i
A.
i
I Annual Surveys for All Projects
i
i
,.........
11.
I
I
I
12.
I
I
I
I
i
13.
I
i
i
I
I
I
\4.
I
Purpose. The purpose of the Annual Survey is to report on the
compliance of a project with the FlnalIDM Plan.
Survey Preparation. The City or the City's designated
representative shall prepare and administer the Annual
Survey of participants in the IDM program.
Suroey Speclfrcations. The survey shall be used to monitor all
projects. The survey administrator shall use statistical
sampling techniques that will create a 95 percent confidence
in the findings.
Suroey Report. A report of the survey findings shall be
presented annually to the Planning Commission and the City
Council.
I
i
I
I
I Triennual Reportsfor Applicants Seeking an FAR Bonus
I
11. Pwpose. The purpose of the Triennial Report is to encourage
I alternative mode use and to document the effectiveness of the
! Final IDM plan in achieving the required alternative mode
I
I use.
12.
.. I. r a
Triennial Report Preparation. The Triennial report will be
prepared by an independent consultant. retained by City and
Chapter 20.120- Page 14
paid for by applicant, who will work in concert with the
Designated Employer Contact.
3. SubmittaL The Triennial Report shall be submitted every three
years on the anniversary date of the granting of the certificate
of occupancy for a building or facility.
4. Response Rate. The information for the Triennial Report shall
be obtained from all employees working in the buildings. All
nonresponses will be counted as a drive alone trip.
5. Required Alternative Mode Use. The Triennial Report shall
state whether the non-residential development has or has not
achieved its required percent alternative mode use. If the
development has not achieved the required alternative mode
use, the applicant shall provide an explanation of how and
why the goal has not been reached and a detailed description
of Additional Measures that will be adopted in the coming
year to attain the required alternative mode use. Any and all
Additional Measures must include an implementation
schedule by month.
6. Historical Comparison. The Triennial Report shall include a
comparison to historical responses on the survey and if a
mode share has changed signtllcantly, a detailed description
as to why the mode share has changed.
7. City Review. The Chief Planner shall review all Triennial
Reports. If at anytime the reports indicate failure to achieve
the stated policy goals, those reports will be submitted to the
City Council.
8. Penalty for Noncompliance. If after the initial 'Ii1ennial Report,
the subsequent Triennual Report indicates that, in spite of
the changes in the Final TOM Plan, the required alternative
mode use is still not being achieved, or if an applicant fails to
submit a Triennial Report at the times described above, the
City may assess applicant a penalty. The penalty shall be
established by City Council resolution on the basis of project
size and actual percentage alternative mode use as compared
to the percent alternative mode use established in the TOM
Plan.
,;~
Chapter 20.120- Page 15
.. I. I.
9. Application of the Penalty. In determining whether a financial
penalty is appropriate, the City may consider whether the
applicant has made a good faith effort to achieve the required
altemative mode use. H a penalty is imposed such penalty
sums shall be used by the City toward the implementation of
the Final TOM Plan.
20. ~20.110 Appeals
In acpordance with Chapter 20.90: Appeal Procedure, an applicant may
appecJ an administrative decision to the Planning Commission and if the
applicant is not satisfied with the decision of the Planning Commission,
the applicant may appeal the decision to the City Council.
;
I
III.
Chapter 20.120- Page 16
,. I I
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2006
7:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting
Council business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at
7:30 p.m. in the MuniCipal Services Building,' Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, Soutli San
Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item,
please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the
City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public
comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for
investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more
comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your
name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES
PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation.
The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Council action.
JOSEPH A. FERNEKES
Mayor
RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR
Vice Mayor
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Councilman
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Councilman
KARYLMATSUMOTO
Councilwoman
RICHARD BAIT AGLIA
City Treasurer
SYLVIA M. PAYNE
City Clerk
BARRY M. NAGEL
City Manager
STEVENT. MATTAS
City Attorney
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMP AIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS
. Day in the Park, September 23, 2006 - Committee members Judy Bush, Jim Metz and Liza
Normandy
. Proclamation: Constitution Week, 2006 - recipient: Francisca Larios Hansen, Constitution
Week Chairwoman
. Proclamation: One Book One Community, San Mateo County Reads Month - Lando
Baldocchi, Library Board of Trustees Member
. Live Online Homework Help offered through the Library - Ana Linder, Literacy Program
Manager and Ann Mahon, Children's Services Manager
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
. Announcements
. Committee Reports
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of August 9 and 16, 2006
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 13, 2006
3. Resolution approving Public Safety Managers compensation plan extension
4. Resolution ofIntention to vacate the public easement at 211 Arroyo Drive and set a
public hearing date of October 25, 2006 to consider the abandonment request
5. Resolution approving and authorizing recordation of Park Station Condominium final
subdivision map, DCC&Rs and related documents
6. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of funds from the Department of Conservation,
Division of Recycling, to Promote Litter Prevention Through Community Outreach in
the amount of $16,546
7. Resolution amending the list of designated positions subject to the Conflict ofInterest
Code
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 13,2006
PAGE 2
8. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of a donation from the Friends of Parks and
Recreation, via Kaiser Permanente, to continue the FRESH Program in the amount of
$30,000
9. Acknowledgement of proclamation issued: Lou Poletti, 8/18/06
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
10. Resolution awarding contract to Lister Construction, Inc. for the recreation center site
work in the amount of $688,900
LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS
11. Resolution expressing opposition to Proposition 90 in the November 7,2006 General
Election
COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM
CLOSED SESSION
12. Closed Session: Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6, conference with labor
negotiator, Elaine Yamani, for all units
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 13, 2006
PAGE 3
AGENDA ITEM #3
DATE: September 13, 2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Elaine Yamani, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT EXTENSION OF THE
CURRENT COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGERS UNIT EMPLOYEES.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
sign an agreement extension of the current Compensation Plan with the Public Safety
Managers Unit.
BACKGROUND
The City and the Public Safety Managers Unit (consisting of 12 management employees in the Fire
and Police Departments) have discussed and agreed that the current Compensation Plan (CP) with
effective dates January l, 2002 to December 31, 2004, which was previously extended through June
30, 2006, should be extended by 30 months through December 31, 2008. Attached is the Extension
to the Compensation Plan document which was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney that
incorporates these agreed-upon terms and conditions of employment.
FUNDING
The existing contract for the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) provides for a 3%
salary increase in July 2006 and a survey in 2007. The Police Association agreement provides for a
5 % salary increase in January 2006 for sworn officers and an increase tied to the consumer price
index (CPI) in 2007.
CONCLUSION
The adoption of this resolution allows the extension of the existing agreement and maintains
consistency for the Public Safety Managers and their respective bargaining unit.
By:
/' '
~/.J. I.v~ [/1. (2j')/l{t.--t.,,-,
Elai~~amani
Human R sources Director
Attachments: Extension to the Compensation Plan
Resolution
Extension to the Compensation Plan
for the
City of South San Francisco
and the
Public Safety Managers Unit Employees
The City and Public Safety Managers have discussed and agreed that the current
Compensation Plan with effective dates January 1, 2002 to December 3l, 2004 (CP) for the
employees in the Public Safety Managers Unit (PSM), which was previously extended through
June 30, 2006, should be extended by 30 months through December 31, 2008 as set forth below:
1. "Me Too" Compensation and Benefits
During this CP extension, the City will continue to provide wage increases to Fire
Service Public Safety Managers and Police Service Public Safety Managers according to the
same "me too" practice as it previously has under the current CP (See CP, Section 2.l). The
City also will continue during the term of the CP extension its current practices of providing
those benefits previously provided to Fire Service Public Safety Managers as provided for
employees represented by IAFF and providing those benefits as previously provided to Police
Service Public Safety Managers as provided for employees represented by the Police
Association.
2. RHS
Employees in this unit shall continue to be eligible to participate in the Retirement Health
Savings Plan (RHS) Plan subject to the terms and conditions of the City's contract with the
provider. The RHS plan which became effective July I, 2005, is designed to help employees set
aside money/payouts tax-free while employed to pay for unreimbursed health expenses
(insurance premiums, deductibles, out-of-pocket costs, etc.) incurred after retirement.
3. Re-Openers
From January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007, both the City and PSM will have the right
to re-open for discussion one subject that is included, specifically discussed, and governed by the
current CPo
Should either the City or PSM wish to re-open any subject covered by the current CP
contract extension, it must notify the other party no sooner than August 1, 2007 and no later than
October 1, 2007, except that a party that receives notice that the other party wishes to re-open a
section of the CP shall have 30 calendar days to respond that it also wishes to re-open a section
of the CPo Thus, for example, if the City received notice from PSM on August 1, 2007 that PSM
wished to re-open a section of the CP, the City would have until August 31, 2007 to notify PSM
that the City also wanted to re-open a section of the CP. Any notice that a party wishes to re-
Extension to Compensation Plan for Public Safety Managers Unit
Page 2
open a section of the CP pursuant to its rights under this Side Letter must be in writing, and
specify the section of the CPo
While the parties are not obligated to reach agreement on any re-opener issue, they shall
meet and confer in good faith. The parties shall not be required to utilize or exhaust any
impasse, impasse resolution, or arbitration procedure that, in the absence of this paragraph, they
otherwise would be required to exhaust or utilize under any City policy, rule or practice,
agreement, or state or federal law .
This Extension to the Compensation Plan shall not affect the parties' previously held
rights and obligations as specifically set forth in this Extension.
Public Safety Manager Representative,
Bob Green, Battalion Chief
Date
Public Safety Manager Representative
Mike Brosnan, Police Lieutenant
Date
Barry M. Nagel, City Manager
Date
Elaine Yamani, Director of Human Resources
Date
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCn..., CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT EXTENSION OF
THE CURRENT COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO PUBUC SAFETY MANAGERS UNIT EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, staff desires approval of an agreement extension with the South San
Francisco Public Safety Managers Unit; and
WHEREAS, the attached Exhibit A summarizes the compensation plan extension; and
WHEREAS, a side letter agreement to the current Memorandum of Understanding
document will be prepared, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney, which
incorporates these agreed upon terms and conditions of employment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves an agreement extension with the South San
Francisco Public Safety Managers.
BE IT, FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute
the agreement on behalf of the City of South San Francisco.
*
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
_ day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AlN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
~'t\l. s~
~
~ - ~v..\
(~ ~l
~ ()
tJ 0
~l~~~ Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM #4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 13,2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
INTENT TO V ACA TE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT AT 21l ARROYO
DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, adopt a resolution of intention to vacate a
ten-foot (10') wide and a five-foot (5') wide Public Utilities Easement (p.U.E.) located at 211
Arroyo Drive, Block 19, Lot 9, Rancho Buri Buri No.2 Subdivision (Assessor Parcel Number
010-370-180) and set the date to conduct a public hearing on October 25, 2006.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION
On October 5,2005, the Design Review Board reviewed and approved plans for an addition to an existing
single family dwelling with a new 3-car garage located at 211 Arroyo Drive, owned by Frank and Sharrin
Rios. The property is located in the Single Family Residential (R-I-E) Zone District. The new addition is
proposed to be built over a portion of two existing Public Utility Easements (PUBs) within the subject
property. Currently, there are no utilities located in these easements.
The property owners have requested the vacation of the ten-foot wide and the five-foot PUBs in order to
construct these improvements. All water, sewer and storm drainage facilities are located within the street
right-of-way fronting this property and PG&E/communication facilities are located at a separate exclusive
easement. The City has no future plans to construct any new facilities within the subject easements.
Exhibit A shows the proposed addition to the existing home. Exhibit B shows the plat map for easement
abandonment prepared by the project land surveyor.
FUNDING
The applicant has paid the City's filing fee for the abandonment request.
Staff Report
Subject: INTENT TO V ACA TE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT AT 211 ARROYO DRIVE
Page 2 of 2
CONCLUSION
Adoption of the resolution of intent to vacate these PUBs will set the date to conduct a public hearing
on October 25,2006 to consider the abandonment request.
By: ~-u
Marty Van Duyn
Assistant City Manager--
--
APProved:~ · c:~)
. Nagel
City Manager
RR/SB/rc
Attachment: Resolution
Exhibit "A" - Site Map with Proposed Improvements
Exhibit "B" - Plat of Easements to be vacated
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE A lO-FOOT
WIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT AND A 5-FOOT
WIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT LOCATED AT 211
ARROYO DRIVE, BLOCK 19, LOT 9, RANCHO BURl
BURl NO. 2 SUBDIVISION (ASSESSOR PARCEL
NUMBER 01O-370-l80) AND SET THE DATE TO
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING FOR OCTOBER 25, 2006
TO CONSIDER THE ABANDONMENT REQUEST
WHEREAS, Frank and Sharrin Rios have requested that the City vacate a lO-foot
wide public utilities easement and a 5-foot public utilities easement located at 211 Arroyo
Drive, Lot 9, Block 19, Rancho Buri Buri; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this request is to allow the construction of a home
addition and a three-car garage; and
WHEREAS, there are no existing public utilities within these easements; and
WHEREAS, the City has no future plans for installing new utilities in these
easements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco that the City Council hereby adopts a resolution of intent to vacate a
lO-foot public utilities easement and 5-foot public utilities easement located at 211
Arroyo Drive, Lot 9, Block 19, Rancho Buri Buri (Assessor Parcel Number 010-370-180)
and set the date to conduct a public hearing for October 25, 2006 to consider the
abandonment request.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
856769vl
ATTEST:
City Clerk
r-
,
/i
1lI $
~ ~
~ ~
~ i
~ ~ ffi ffi
i i ill ..
~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~
o ~ ui ~ ~
z 0: 2 c fl
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 3 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
Ii' ~ Ii' Ii'
~~~~
L
~
.
.
:13l
HAlliG OAmnIV
::J
~~;::!1
~o:;!~
O~!i1~
~iZ~~
fil ofil
~O!::~
~~~~
~~(/)5
~o~1=
NUj:::<
~"'''i:i
I ~~~~
~~~~
W{l)~o:!
iil~u~
~5l~~
~
~ ~.
li! ~~
~ "I~ fa
9 . ~u 5
1iJ:g "'. <
oi't 58 2
I!i;! J
tI) ~~
fi g~
< ,..J f"- r<\O
~~"'O'" 0'"
~~~~~~~ ~~
~_o",::lzo !:!~
ti
'"
I
!
..
I ~
z 3
gpa
~ ~ 2 g !j!j
~)~iil~~~
~ ~ ~ i g ~ ~
~ '" 0 0 2 1) ~
I
.13l0f~tl~
I
~
to ~ ~
'" z
@ ~ B
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~
I;: ~ ~ ..> to ~ gj
~ O! 0 ~ ~ .. 8
~ ~ Ii! ~ " ~ ~
8 8 . 0 U U Q.,
~ A. ~ ~ ~ :: ~
~~II~~g
~ tfl ~
~
I
~
~
o
..,
o
>
~
I
'"
~
f3 ~
cr~ n
2\"
~ ~ H
~ uj.'~ ~j~
~ Ij;.~ . . .
en ,,8~1lISi
~ iUl~ In
0.. :s~g~13 o:~~
- ~3g
~
~
~
Q.
<(
~
o
Q.
o .
t: (3
>-wO
O:::>U
<(-C/)
00::-
zoU
::>oz
o>-~
III 0 u.
>- 0:: Z
1-0::<(
O:::<(C/)
W;:I
Q.NI-
o :J
0::: 0
a. C/)
(j)
o
-
0:::
~
PORTION OF LOT 9~ BLOCK 19
PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 27 OF MAPS
AT PAGES 25 THRU 28 ON JULY 3~ 1947
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA
N50046'05"W 1 0.02'
(Record=N500 45'52"W)
<0
~
o 10'
~
15''57.>0
'57~,
~..
<$'7,
C?o
(9,
TP.O.B. PARCEL 2
March 10, 2006
rofessional Land Services
Michael S. Mahoney, P.L.s.
901 Sneath Lane, Suite 117
San Bruno, CA 94066
-
~'t1l s4N
&
(~ 8
t:l ~
v 0
e4l!f2J'~~ Staff Re120rt
AGENDA ITEM #5
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 13,2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager
PARK STATION CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION FINAL MAP (P03-0092)
1410 EL CAMINO REAL
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, adopt a resolution approving the Park Station
Condominium Subdivision Final Map (P03-0092), accepting the dedication of Sidewalk Easement,
Emergency Access Easement and Public Access and Open Space Easement and authorizing the
recordation of the map, approved declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) and
related documents.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City Engineer and the City's technical reviewer, with the concurrence of all affected City departments
and divisions, have determined that the Park Station Condominium Subdivision Final Map, Declaration of
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and related documents are in compliance with the
Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all applicable tentative map conditions of
approval. The final map and CC&Rs have been signed by the Subdivider.
The Park Station Condominium Subdivision Final Map will subdivide (upon filing of a condominium plan
with the County Recorder) the property shown on the final map into 99 condominium air-space residential
units located within four story buildings. Each unit will be served by private driveways and storm drains and
will connect to the public sanitary sewer system within the site that lies in an existing 10' wide sanitary
sewer easement previously granted to the City. The project has two driveway connections, one on El Camino
Real and the other on BART Drive. The on-site portion of both driveways will be encumbered by
Emergency Access Easements, the dedication of which is proposed to be accepted by the City on behalf of
the public.
Sidewalk and landscaping frontage improvements along El Camino Real and BART Drive will be
constructed by the subdivider and secured by a bond, thereby eliminating the need for a subdivision
improvement agreement. There is an existing easement on BART Drive to allow for the reconstruction of
existing sidewalk. On El Camino Real, the existing sidewalk will be re-constructed and the subdivider will
be dedicating a 2' wide Sidewalk Easement, the dedication of which is proposed to be accepted by the City
on behalf of the public. The subdivider has obtained an encroachment permit from Caltrans for the
construction work along El Camino Real.
Staff Report
Subject: PARK STATION CONDIMINIUM SUBDIVISION FINAL MAP (P03-0092)
1410 EL CAMINO REAL
Page 2 of 2
The subdivider is also dedicating to the City a Public Access and Open Space Easement at the northeast
comer of the property for the South San Francisco BART Linear Park Trail and Bike Path, the dedication of
which is proposed to be accepted by the City on behalf of the public. Construction of the Park Trail and Bike
Path will be part of a future City construction project.
The attached resolution will approve the Final Map, and authorize the recordation of the Park Station
Condominium Subdivision Final Map, CC&Rs and related documents.
CONCLUSION
The recommended motion will accept the Final Map and authorize recordation of the Final Map, CC&Rs
and related documents.
By:
Marty Van Duyn
Assistant City Manag
1\Pprov~~ t ~,
M. Nagel
City Manager
RRIW A/rc
Attachment: Resolution
Location Map
Final Map
857283-1 (405-001)
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PARK STATION
CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION FINAL MAP (P03-
0092) ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF SIDEW ALK
EASEMENT, EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
AND PUBLIC ACCESS AND OPEN SPACE
EASEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE
RECORDATION OF THE MAP, APPROVED
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS (CC&Rs) AND RELATED
DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of the final map, accepting the
dedication of Sidewalk Easement, Emergency Access Easement and Public Access and
Open Space Easement and authorizing the recordation of the map, approved CC&Rs and
related documents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco that the City Council hereby finds that the final map conforms to all
applicable laws and regulations and approves the Park Station Condominium Subdivision
Final Map and authorizes the recordation of the map, approved declaration of covenants,
conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) and related documents.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Park Station CC Reso (9_13) (405-001)
'-,
""A
/ "
/ '\
//" \..
/ )
( //,
"'~ // '\
/' '\
./'
// \
/ // \
[/ ,// \.
/ /".
// // \\
/ '.
/ \
,/ /f\"
,1/ / '\.
/ / \.
/' ',.
/ / ')"
// // / "
//' / ,/-\
/ ." ./ ,
cQ..~
;)
,J
......
,."
~V'
{J.f
..},.J"
J~
,
,
.v.,......"..,:
~':r""'" ,....."'."
/
l
t
i
...............".,...,....",...
,/~.."""
1,1 '"....
'-.,
~ ..".
l
.~.,,,v,:,,.~....,..........,-_....]
,
,
l
j
I
,
!
l
j
/
r
.,/
f
/
.//
(
/
/
/
/.
./
l/
/
/;
/
//
/
/'
/
"
';>./'
""'"
4!
NO SCALE
......"....
..........."
'.,
~.......,
"-,
/
/,/
;./'
/17.'
i'.J"':\
OJ")'
\1,,:\
"'ij;"
/' -',
"',,-
",
"
"".., ).'
'<"
/
///
,/
//
/
,//
,...,Q,/
'i"
,,/
A''J'
q,V
C.,.:",
/~r' ....,.,
......, ~'5/ ..."',.
...., ~/
. ''v.,/
'....,
~.
."....,
"\.
"
"
~u"',.
,.
/'
.-
/
, /
'-"-..</
" /
.,,\.. //
"",", ../"
'./
"
'\,
''''"
<-~''\>..
'"
"""
',.
~~,
.. l
,//
'~" /
""/
./'
/
/
\.. /
.....,/
."
"~
PARK ST A TION "'\.''''''
"'-
CONDOMINIUMS ....."".
"',,-
"-,
"\
\.,
"
\.
",",
'\
"'-
"
",,-,
~
\
~
>,":(
~~
';1~
)~
'(\'
)7"
<\
,
'\
\
,
\.,
\
\,
'\....
.~"
"
LOCATION MAP
PARK STATION
CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION
Z/Tl 0"'0 Z
O~O:::oO
~~~~~
~~~8~
~ ~ ~~:
~~"O~~
~Z~~-4
1/I0l'T'ltnC
5;i:! ~~
z~~f"
ZVllXJ/Tl
o C"
. n'"
~~
~~
is
~
I I
I II
~!~> ~
~~58 ~
lJ1~~~::O
~li)~~~
~~o~~ @
zZ
n ;u
Vi~o'"
p~~~
~:-J-+
~g~
~m-+
~~~
c""
~~~
oo~
g~~
"c
",,,~
~~"O
-0"".
>0",
~~~
~~a
~~~
...."':iJ
~g~
Q.o)~
~g~
0-0
....,fiiRo
V>
~
'"
~
'"
I
a
~
e ~
~8>~
~~~
~~~~
~~~ ~ ~ ~
::::::jn>>J...-.-. -< z
"'s ~
"'....8r ~ ~
~~~ ~ ~
Vl9g. rr1
~~~ 0
c....~o~ ()
rZ~ ~
'"
o
'"
Z
;;
o
"
'"
'"
I
@
~ ~~~d~~
rn -~f)~V)~
~ ~~J:;f;~
~ c':-"l'TI>>:fO
~O~;~i:
~ ~:l<~~~
!=' ~ 0 ~~ z
/Tli~?u:t
3.........1""1,.,
~~~~~
~~fTl~Vi
Q(J)j!:i::uo
z........oiJj"T'l
~~~8~
~~~a~
~~~~~
...., f'I'Id
,,:!l~'!;~
IZ,.,....
Q2z~~
~~IZ~
I'TIg~~~
~~~~d
~i~~ll\
g~~~:t
i!;~~~;
a~~~~
~~~~~
g:tOg~
al""l 8
UJ
o
C
-l
:J:
UJ
~
"
~
Z
()
Vi
()
o
()
l>
r
~
;:0
Z
)>
>0
ZZ
o
,;
'"
-<
-0
C
l!!
o
z
>
z'"
~Io
o
"'lD
~~
o;:l
~-~
~I
'"
'"
o
Z
l'
'<
~
-0
~
'"
'"
o
5~g;g~
~J:lczi!
~~~8~
(/)00 IJ)
oZ""B(J)
~~~~~
~~~~~
~~~~I~
o C'
. n'"
I Oz
"'"
I~ !
~~Ji~>
a~N~O
~zgi!'=~
03:-'
o >> r ~
"el~IIl~O. U
olTlOa -t
~ ~ng:2(J) ~
o \Joc2iC ~
>:::oC3:: m~
r r=~~~~ I'\J
~ "'- .....~Ui?\
o?>ZI'T'J-
o Nzor~
~ao' 0 r"
III ~~~{;l" VJ
;- a 0 0 L.-.J
~~o'r<!1;:O r--""]
UJ "TIofflo>
>>- c-iO)cO
z g:I:~_Z
~ C~CDZO L-..J
,. '!: '" 0 r--""]
~ ~j!og~ ~
a-4~"T'J8~O
OZfT1~;u5
g9""::!ll'T1~Z
Zf\)cn8"'U
=<g~~el~
cr~ffl8~
g88>(J)
t..I ;u"'OrrI
O_c;U(l)
~zc.n;=
8"'lO
c~ ~
~o ~
~~ vi
~t'1
o ^
~ z
;; ~
G)
'!:
g
~
-I "U ..
"''''
G~
Z
>
~
~ ~~~d~~
~ z~?]~~~
lf) If)Z~ 0
~ ~~;;;;~~b
s:: tJ)~fT1
~ ~g:~~~
:z: :-'i-l:z:........ 0
p Io~iiiz
fTl-lI"'l";;:--I
~5E"""";o~
-I-i~'"
~~~~~
~~~g~
~~g~:
"'::0", )>
~~~d~
"f'TlI-i)>
O;of1lI~
~~~;~
~~:~~
Icz 0
~~IZ~
"'~~~g
~o~~d
~~~~lDl
ZI:I: fT1
~~~~:t
z)>OP1
~~~R~I
os::gz~
~~~~~
g~Og~
8 8
lD
-<
o
'"
~
~ ~~rn~ ffl
", ::O"OO:;:ll;: Z
~ ~~go 9
~ . -IC" 0
-<.. 5~-i ~
zz~ ~
CD ~;~ tI)
:> 00""
~ ~;.,!!l ~
~~rn ~
01 m s::
"g~ ~
~g~
:I:~~
~.,,-<
~~~
s::?il'Tl
-1Q~:
I
>"'>
Z"'....
ogo
~"''''
~08
zg~
~{Il~
~~~
~~::u
~~~
If)n~
000
"Z'"
",0
~~~
2dr
~:r~
'"
'"
o
~
~
....
I
'"
'"
'"
."'l
>
~
'"
o
'"
Z
;;
~
Z
'"
Z
"
o
o
'"
-0
o
~
o
Z
>0
zZ
o
,;
~
8~ ffl
~;;l z
~O ~
0" 0
"g ~
" -<
~v>
~ t'1
^
z
o
==
f;i
o
G)
'!:
'"
~
"
c
l!!
o
z,
>-
z'"
~IO
o
"'lD
~~
O;:l
Ul
~~
- ,
II
'<
>
..
"
~
~
o
"
'"
'"
O\J ~ (')
~~ M g
~~ ~ ~
'" I ~
:E~ Vi ~
o!l'l 0
~~ I ~
~~ ~ ~
o rn 0 V)
~II" ~
II ~
:1:-
I ~
~~
PI
~~
?i~
I
II
I I
~~g~
~~~~
"'rrc::Olf)
oOJ'Tl,
~8~g
~~~~
z::I'"
;;-
~~
....0
:1:"
~I
c
m~
~
lD
~
lD
-<
::BI"'
J;; -
j' ;
11'1
, I
I
=J-o
....'"
F.i ~
~
~
o
"
'" Iii
~ :9
z l<~~
" 0>
~ ~~~
~ ~~~
...... ~::OO
~ :>:r:r
~ ~OJ'Tl
~ ~~~
liio~
~ ~~~
~ 3z~
J'Tl . >......
~ ~a
c
~
"
'"
!:l
o
c
'"
V> '"
c c
,," "
~~ g
o;!; I
~F F
6 ~
~ '"
'" '"
.~ ~
(5
> l'
I< F
c -"
d
'" >
~ ~
.... '"
;: 0
i;j ~
o ;;
.... r-
~ ~
~ ~
C
n >
o lD
.~ ~
o
"
~
-<
~
o
I
'"
;:l
C
Z
o
'"
'"
"
~
l'
Q;o~1
\JP-<
~~~
=Jz
g~~1
0~91
~;~l
'"
'-'
~ ~
s ~
o ::E;......OVJ-ic..>~-i 0
~ F~S;~~~~5~ S
ll\"'~~~"'gl<lIl:;: r
;"~~Vi~",~~'ii '2'
~3>~;;;' g~~ ~
"T10Zco-> tn fTl
~~~rt1o~~z;g rrI
~~g~~~~g~ ~
do!ijo~~~~~ U>
~::~3~~~~ ~
~a~~~~~~-< ~
:~@~~~:t~~ r'1
~~5~~""":~g ~
(/)Cz:r-o~/'Tl-lC
C~VJO~VJOIZ
~~z~~~~fT1~
~Ng"O~~~;:O
d~giM~~~~
ro::._tJ;~~VJ~g
:5EgF~U)~~~
q...... s::f'Tla5fT1......~
~-I-iO!::Vl;;oVJO
n~~~.~~~~:
~~~~'Tj~~:i!5
~~uf~~~:u;
fTI:E)>-~o cm
~F~~~~2~
~~~~~~~~
~Vl1~bi~~~
~:l'Tl dh~:Z:
Z _""0>
Z
COO!::I
~~~~
"'0'"
'" "~~I
Q~~~I
~~~:-
G} ~
.. ~ 0
z ["
~" ~I
~~ ~I
~@ 0
~9
n
l'
'"
~
z
;;
o rooo)>(/)- 0
~ 2~~65~ ~
O~M~~~
oo::O-<:r-< ~
~GJN ~~~ G)
C o-orrl> Z
ljtU"~~r;t ~
!~~;;ju;~ ::u
~~o~~~ ui
~~ c;m- ~
,<2l~~5' )>
-l~g3~ ;:;1
fijS:;z~'" ~
-HA~~~ ~
~~~~~
os,." 0
:5-~~~
:gz>l'Tlll)
~~6~~
~'li~ "lJ
,>>=i~
o~~~o
" ~>"'O
:r~F~~
/'T10......A=:~
-IO~o......
~:\J~iij
~~ ~~~
....,rlE,...,~
s::g~M$
to;eUl~6
::I: ~~z
~ ~~
"
>
-0
0-0
",c
"'lD
5~
~c
"''''
0",
l<~
0",
0"
"''''
....z
z;;j
~o
0'"
~~
lD
:i~
~g
'"
~'"
~'"
~l<
00
>0
n-o
0",
"'z
'"
'"
'""0'"
~fii'
~g~
~1Il~
~~~
Qgg
'"
f;~~
~~~
"':i!"
~@S
~l'Tlrr1
"0....
","'0
z'"
~~~
~~
=o5i
"''''
~~
~~
0'"
o~
'"
"'-..
Gig
~~
o!lj
><>
z'"
oz
o
~-<
~~
~a
"''''
o
pl'i~'"
z~c"
8~~/'Tl
8>~~
>\Joo
U:~~~
~n~R:
;!a5a~
~~a~
!01> 0
,,=!;;l<~
xoo~
~z~......
(fjOJ'TlO
f'T1::O::o\J
~~B~
.3~~~
. ....
:i!olii
On",
~~t:!
n"'llii
"'''''''
"'c"
~~~
-'"
~~C1
:u~::o
IIlr",
~5i~
~!"~
o~"O
o,,=c
[;J.?O~
~~@
~\JGl
8>>
nz
>"'0
6l<
o
~
~~~~~ g ~~g~~ ~~~~ ~
. g~lIlzz;~~'f ?C~>c z
~~~~~~m~~~8~Qg S
~1TI ~"O of'Tl"'D::E"E;o
~~d~ ~ ;;~;~ ~~~~ ~
> ~l'Tl Z~"(I)lJ) s;);a;;.;
6\S",-:;-~ ~oo~,; :i!~c' '"
~~p:-.8rot~~~~:lJ)~~ ~
~o~~ 0 og~~. ~~8> ~
:t:~::U~~8~;oz>z"'c8
: o~_~ C1 ~{j~~~ ~~~~
~""':;j ~.~tg8, ~~c~
gRa~!".~~~~~ ~'...... ~......
~g~~g~~~~~~~~~
~.oo z~. ~o~;e: "Oc
(J)::E~?o~~~ztJ:s~~~z
....,~C!1TI~ 0 lf) ~o
~IF-4z::emi::to~z8~
b~;g~~~ln~~~~~~:i
-4IOO"T'!:Z:OONOZ[;: ",
~:~~~~ggfD~~~~~
"'DO~ Ofl"lCCNOOZrr\~
~~-. ~NQ~~8~ ~~~",
\Joi~-~~. mo:ro~~
~~-4~~~a~tn~;a~~
:::I,-ilf),." . oCf"l ....,~
OZ~:E~~N>OS::~:r:;f~
Z~lf)a.lf) ~gFg\J zI'T1)';S)
~ S::IJ)-i:rmoS:::c ::O......I
o~tf'T1~ b"'~~~~~F
E:i~81f)~~~z~g\J~\J
zrrloBi~;3(D'-IO,!l)M::O?o?O
Cl:r~~~~""'\J. CDO~(Tl:;:ll;:
~~~-~g~~ ~~~:r~
:1z V)-4~Op f;)\J t"l'Jg
Vi ~ ~.o~ F _z
~ 5 ~ ~
n<::!
~!<
0;;
"-0
~~
~.t"I'J
o
~~
~g
t5~
Vi
n
o
~ :iz~g~8:- 9
;-:-:",......:rc~c~-<
!=? ~iij~5 :r~~
MOo'V)- > ~
;o~,,~ ~~)2 ::0
~~~5 ?J~og ^
ot/) 0 ~;o!., ui
8~~z Q~Q 0
n~~:i ~~~ rrI
~~o"" o~o ~
~l'Tl-41 CD::OM =Ti
. .~~ ~~~ 0
~
~~ ~~~ M
\J~~ g~~
~ 8 '-( Z:<J'Tl
~~~ e;~~
c~1 ~~
wi':: ,..,......~
;~I' ~~g
8z >~:i!
~~ ~g~
~~ c~z
~~g ~~~
::E;. en I:OZ
~ ~ ~ ~:~
:t~f; 5~9
;~~ ~~~
~zo ~o~
OZ 0.,,'-1
~8 8
~ UI'
"'n
"'<
x.
:<l>
;u....
"'....
",,,,
.. .z
",;u
~~t
~~I'
0"
"0
'"
n- ;;l
g~ 0
;u'" :J:
"'''' Z
~: ~
~ ;0
:i! ~
'< ~
- '"
~ ~
III
~ ~
~ ~
o '!:
! g
:i!
'"
"
'"
:I:
Z
"
z
l'
"
>
-0
Vi
i'1
n
I
z
o
l'
'<
1~1U;lo;l::;IO;I..I':I;;;I;;;I:::lo~ ~ ~ B~
n
o
;0
o~~~~g~~~~~~~..~~~nm.o~o
~~~~~~~~~~:g~;~~;;~:;~~~
~~~~n~~~o~ffin~~~F~~gp~~~~
w;on3 co~~cw> ~ ~ ~>~
~~~~'~6~~~n~R~~o~~~~~8~~
~g~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~:~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~a~~~
o~~m~Coc~~~~ ~z ~~ ~o
~. o~~ ~~~~ ~~~~8~~~o~~
z~~~~oc~~p~~~~~.o~~~~~~
~~o~ ~~o~.~~z ,~~~'~
~~~~~~~~z~~~i~~~~~~~~~~
~8o~.~w~~~~~P@~g~~M~~m~
g~~~~~~~~g~~S88~~8~~8~~
~O^~~@~~~~pN~OOOQ~~ ogo
ZO~OOO~~M~ g,OOO~>~~OO~
~p~mgo~~~g~mg~~p8~>~~~~
~~.~~!~.~p~~~no~~~6~n~~
~g~g8~P~P~~g~~~g~~~;~~~
~~SPP~~S~ggP8~~b~~~~~Sn
~~8~,~~8~b~~P~~~~~~~~~9
~omgN~~m~m g~~m~ ~~'Mm~
~~m8~o~o~8mN~~NCW~~~~>
~. bfmg g~pb8~~ ~~pS~ ~
z Omo~ 0> ml~~ ~~~O~ ~
~ g~~~~g~>~~o~~ w~,~~ ~
~ ~eg~g~g~g~~~P 2~~~P m
p g ~~PgP~b moo gPgo~ p
o m ~~m~~~ ~~ ~oug~ ~
~ ~ ~~~~~e ~~ ~~~~~ ~
w ~ '1~1~ ww u-8~w ~
~ e 8~~go ~- ~~ooo ~
~ u~ ~~ ~~ ~~~b~ ~
~~ ~~ 88 ~~8~o ~
~ g ~ :: :~b~: ~
~ p 3 ~~ e,~ 8 ~
- ~ I I t~~ ~ ~
~ 8 ~~ f~w .<D~
m I mm m~
m I\J ~~ CD~
:!J -..J~
o
:::
n
a2~nn~Q~~ ~
;ii
~~~~~~:;~ ~
~~g~~'-'!.t~o r
~~~~~E~~~ fT1
22~~g&l!3~~
~ ~
~ N4754''''oQll".
III N~~'9!"!. ~.~.
~ 0
~I~ ~
~I& ~
iT4i5~e::-E59.""60f ~
~ ~
t-.:Il'\l 1..1(..1(..1(..1
qUJOI"'lOJDJDJIJ!
g1::~Sb~~~O
~uitSt.iN........Nf!l
loON III (..I1'\l I'\l I'\lN--4
...... ".>>
~
1~~~.~~~~1
(..I!Jl......(..I...(..I!;;
!D[J)I'\l......NUlNZ
~~~~.~~~a.~
"
'"
'"
l/)
o 00''\,)[1]
~ 8~PJ~ )>
:J: \2"'''' 0
~ Rlzg~ z
z o 8 s:: 0),- ",
-"el~~o 5 ~
o ITIOo ~ -t - \,J
"TlO 0"'" ~
~~gg~ ~ ~
",;oC;!: lD~
r- ;= ~ "'..., S2 f1'\J
;0 ",. ~~ ~ ~
89'~~a ~,,,
:::0""'0. Z
~ g~~Gl ." en
o r~o 0 L.......J
-"~OI<!!;Or--"J
II! -"o:'llo>
z g e:o 0
n~o- z
S::C~(X)Z 0 L.......J
>~ lit 0 ~
;;j~~o:;ils:::~
o~:;v"Tla ~ 0
(')Z~O C
g 9r=:1~ ~
z""'~n8 '"OZ
=<glll~elc
~ 'f:!!:::ofTl 2g
r- omfTlO 0
;g e:8~:!Q ~
~ ~z~~ (f)
;;
~
I
a
: ~~ ~
~ --< Q
z " l/)
~~> ~ ~ g
~::gQ
~c;~ ~
s~1 ~ ~
:~n~
o 0 ~ ~
?~~~. ~ M
~~~~"F.io
~~~' ~ B
["l ~. C
~ ~.. ~
r 0 =<
~ -
;0
z
5>
o
."
"
~
I
~
q_........::tIVlO""Q! I:;j
................~.....F'T'J""">~" 000 C>
~"'I ~
'" 0
~~~~5g~~~d~
~o-o~~~~~~
~~~~ n~~o~
z~:o"'~71~~~.Jlo.
"'l~q~r-n-< :Z50
Oz.....tJl(T1[ri>CD 0
~a~~fTltJlg~~z
:;;j ~~~~l:ri~x~
~ l""l~-<otJl:O~~
~~~~~
.....,..,JTImQ
~~ ~8
~~ 11).
~ ~~
:<
l!t--,.
\66~
(....f<:--
~""'i! RJ) 1';:;:--....
~gJ,~ /
UlQctcu ;?~I.
__~~ "i!J :;e/~
t:~zei. /joi/q
t.. Ul r 0 ____ t.4lf,'
~~~ ~,.,+-----
Z r ~ __I
E ~~ J.~/~
~lD~ 0818
~o ~ /.
I
I
)>
;::
0_1
"H"
o :;~
c ~g
:u ~~
"=i.,.1
~~II
~;~
cn~
,
;::
~
'"
~
'"
"i
?ii~
zoo
~ .
o
>J:~n~~
~~8~~ r!!
~O~MmVJ
~g8~~ ~
Vi~z~5m
ooo-~
O:OO~Z
"'IF'T'Joz:!: _
~~:~::5
::tIO"'" vi(/)
ZIl)CD~O
fJ~~~rl
~d~~~
~~~~~
01:'-1 0
zO""Q~1"'1
:r2go~
Ui~tJl"TIf2
~~~;g~
. .0--400
o~."
~e!iQ
. €; ~
~~l1~
o c
~
t~
~
I !!!
~!
~:o I :'
a~~1 I "--
~~~~'
~ 28.00' I
.2 I
I ~l
1 ::1
Lil
0,1
"'I
~I
!"I
atl
;0 " ;0 "!
.. '" " ;0
'"
~ \l ~ r ~
;0 Sl
'" ~ 0
0 z ~ r ~
., 0 '"
~ z n
0 n '" '"
~ g '" > III
" " ~
~ ., C
VI
.,
~
"i
z
9
'"
'"
"
~
~."
mll
me
;::
ciE
mO
cn'"
1I
N
0 ;;; 0
0 '" " 0
P I oo P
~ I
"" I ~ ...
" -.J I "
0 0 '" 0
0 '" 0
'" ~ '"
I d I
0 :::i 0
~ '" '"
0 '" ~
.. ~
I
~
::1
~I i
-- -- ~~
:~8.~
;:;,
'-I
---- "':
-~
I -
,
I
!"!I
",I
01
I
:0\'
--
--
--
--
JVJ.'o.~
fL 2BJ~
- ____ CA.MINO
- (Sl"A1< H R fA.L
~ ':.HIvArJ
----
----
010
~ I ~
~ I ~
~ I ~
o '"
~ I ~
'" '"
- en
r
>
Z
o
~~g~a;-"~
~~~~~~~
~?u~2o~
Y1~~~8a
~~:t~~~
~~:~[?o
~-.~~~~
M~~e;~~
~~6~~~
~~~ ~
n '" >
oj "
~ ~ 1"'1
Z V>
~ a ~
~ -. z
~ ~ z
!
~ ~ ~
o ~r-_C" i ~
~ '1(..1 ---........Af~'f'i,'.J8. ~~ M
: ~Il~/ ...~~1,. t ~
51. _ _ _ ~:E1..~- I i
;;;f S49"33'S7't: 122.33'
~ i
I~~:P ~~ ~
I:!;", ~I _ ~[_ JVJ6"O.',.,.. q
10UO"'1 -.../ -~~ ...oJO.rr
(>>0 ~I'" _~_~'99 Or XI
I II~q ~I~!D -~ "'";;;.",~_... J.
~ U1~ -
II "'1-
~L24'OO''''1-....
s4i5i'Oit: -,
l ~
I
I
I I
I I
~
~
~
o
~
~
>
z
r
'" 0
;0
'"
~
" -l
0
...
0
H-
'"
"
->.
"
>
t;
...
....
i
'"
o
n
I:)!:~ ~
<
z ~ '"
~~m ~
> ~~i ~
.~O
0;
~~~
LANDS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
~~
'"
~
>
-
~'t\\ S:4N
.il
o 0
:>-0 r;;
~ ()
v c
C4lIFOy..~\.~
AGENDA ITEM #6
Staff Report
DATE: September 13,2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Terry White, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PROMOTE LITTER PREVENTION THROUGH COMMUNITY OUTREACH
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to accept funding provided by the
Department of Conservation in the amount of $16,546 to Promote Litter Prevention through
Community Outreach.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, Community Outreach Branch, and
Regional Recycling Assistance make funds available to assist in promoting litter prevention
awareness. Public Works applied successfully for grant funds and was awarded $16,546. The
outreach goals identified by the City of South San Francisco were as follows: Promote litter
prevention through community outreach including community clean up events, advertising and
promotional materials.
FUNDING:
Funding for this project is through a grant provided by the Department of Conservation Division for
Recycling in the amount of $16,546. Acceptance of this funding does not obligate the City for
additional funding.
Staff Repoli
Subject: Promote Litter Prevention through Community Outreach
Page 2
CONCLUSION:
Acceptance of these grant funds will enable the Community Preservation Task Force to augment its
outreach to the community and promote litter prevention.
/1 cllb-
B~C ,_A L% .-
Terry Whi tel
Director ofYublic Works
Approved: '\
Attachments: Resolution
TW /deb
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
CONSERV ATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,546 TO
PROMOTE LITTER PREVENTION THROUGH
COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, staff recommends the acceptance of grant funds from the Department of
Conservation in the amount of $16,546 to promote litter prevention through community
outreach; and
WHEREAS, the grant funds will be available to the Community Preservation Task
Force for implementing the litter prevention program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South
San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the acceptance of funds provided by
the Department of Conservation in the amount of $16,546 for the Litter Prevention through
Community Outreach Program.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted
by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on
the day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
856775vl
AGENDA ITEM #7
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 13, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sylvia M. Payne, City Clerk
RESOLUTION AMENDING LIST OF DESIGNATED POSITIONS THAT ARE
SUBJECT TO THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution amending the City's
conflict of interest code.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION
The Fair Political Practices Commission requires a biennial review ofthe City's conflict of interest
code to ascertain compliance. As a result of adding, deleting and modifying employee positions since
2004, the list of designated positions subj ect to the conflict of interest code must be updated to reflect
those changes. The City Attorney determined the applicable disclosure categories. The following
changes are recommended:
Disclosure
Action Sec # Title Category
Add 1.13 San Mateo County Mosquito Abatement District - SSF 1,2,3,4,5,6
representative
Add 2.3 Assistant to the City Manager l, 2, 4
Add 8.6 Senior Engineer (Public Works) 1,2,4,6
Add 8.8 Public Works Supervisor 1.2.4 6
Delete 6.7 From "Housing and Commercial Rehab Specialist" to 1,2,4
and add "Community Development Coordinator"
Delete 8.7 From "Construction Manager" to "Public Works 1,2,4,6
and add Inspector"
Delete 8.9 From "Environmental Compliance Coordinator" to 1,2,4,6
and add "Technical Services Supervisor"
Delete 11.3 From "Project Read Director" to "Literacy Program 6
and add Manager"
Delete 6.8 Economic Dev./Redev. Proiect Manager N/A
Delete 6.15 Development Review Coordinator N/A
Delete 10.10 Senior Code Enforcement Officer N/A
Delete 11.5 Supervising Librarian N/A
Delete l2.2 Director of Parks, Recreation & Maintenance Services N/A
Delete l2.3 Superintendent of Recreation & Community Services N/A
Delete 12.4 Deputy Director of Maintenance Services N/A
Staff Report
Subject: Conflict oflnterest Code Designations
September 13,2006
Page 2
Upon approval of the resolution, statements of economic interest will be forwarded to persons
holding designated positions, as required by the conflict of interest code, for filing with the City
Clerk, the designated filing officer.
s~a~
City Clerk
Attachment: Resolution
Exhibit A - Applicable Disclosure Categories
2006 Local Biennial Notice
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE LIST OF
DESIGNATED POSITIONS SUBJECT TO THE CITY
OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO'S CONFUCT OF
INTEREST CODE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 86-2004, the City Council previously adopted a list
of designated positions subject to the City's Conflict ofInterest Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 1347-05, 1350-05, 1359-05 and
1371-06, amending SSFMC section 3.12.010, to add, delete, and amend specified City employee
positions; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend the list of designated positions to reflect the
changes made to Municipal Code section 3.12.010.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the changes to the list of designated positions
and also approves the revised Exhibit A, which includes the changes identified herein.
Disclosure
Action Sec # Title Category
Add 1.13 San Mateo County Mosquito Abatement District - SSF 1,2,3,4,5,6
representative
Add 2.3 Assistant to the City Manager 1,2,4
Add 8.6 Senior Engineer (Public Works) 1,2,4,6
Add 8.8 Public Works Supervisor 1, 2, 4, 6
Delete 6.7 From "Housing and Commercial Rehab Specialist" to 1,2,4
and add "Community Development Coordinator"
Delete 8.7 From "Construction Manager" to "Public Works 1,2,4,6
and add Inspector"
Delete 8.9 From "Environmental Compliance Coordinator" to 1,2,4,6
and add "Technical Services Supervisor"
Delete 11.3 From "Project Read Director" to "Literacy Program 6
and add Manager"
Delete 6.8 Economic Dev./Redev. Proiect Manager N/A
Delete 6.15 Development Review Coordinator N/A
Delete 10.1 0 Senior Code Enforcement Officer N/A
Delete 11.5 Supervising Librarian N/A
Delete 12.2 Director of Parks, Recreation & Maintenance Services N/A
Delete 12.3 Superintendent of Recreation & Community Services N/A
Delete 12.4 Deputy Director of Maintenance Services N/A
Conflict of Interest Code 2006 (Reso).DOC
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
A TrEST:
City Clerk
Conflict of Interest Code 2006 (Reso).OOC
Resolution No.
Exhibit A
DESIGNATION OF POSITIONS AND
APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Designated Positions Disclosure
Category
Members of the following
Boards and Commissions
1.1 City Council Form 700
1.2 Design Review Board l, 2, 3, 4
1.3 Historic Preservation Commission 1
1.4 Housing Authority 1
1.5 Library Board 6
1.6 Parking Place Commission 3,4,6
1.7 Planning Commission Form 700
1.8 Parks & Recreation Commission l, 2, 4, 6
1.9 Conference Center Board 6
1.10 Cultural Arts Commission l,2
1.11 Public Facilities Corporation 1, 2, 4
1.l2 Board of Appeals l, 2, 4
1.13 Mosquito Abatement District 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
2. City Manager
2.1 City Manager Form 700
2.2 Assistant City Manager l, 2, 4
2.3 Assistant to the City Manager 1, 2, 4
3. City Clerk
3.l City Clerk 5
3.2 Deputy City Clerk 6
4. City Attornev
4.l City Attorney Form 700
4.2 Assistant City Attorney l,2,3,4,5,6
5. City Treasurer
5.1 City Treasurer Form 700
5.2 Deputy City Treasurer l, 2, 3, 4,5,6
6. Department of Economic &
Community Development
6.1 Director of Economic & Community Dev. 1, 2, 4
6.2 City Planner 1,2,4
6.3 Principal Planner 1,2,4
6.4 Senior Planner l, 2, 4
1
6.5 Associate Planner 1, 2, 4
6.6 Assistant Planner 1, 2, 4
6.7 Housing and Con11nercial Rehab Specialist +,2,4
6.7 Community Development Coordinator 1, 2, 4
6.8 EconOlnic Dev./Redev. Project J\1anager +,2,4
6.9 Manager of Housing and Redeveloplnent 1, 2, 4, 6
6.9 City Building Official 1, 2, 4, 6
6.10 Assistant Building Official 1, 2, 4
6.11 Senior Building Inspector 1, 2, 4
6.12 Pennit Technician 1, 2, 4
6.13 City Engineer 1, 2, 4, 6
6.14 Senior Civil Engineer 1, 2, 4, 6
6.15 Developlnent Revie'vv Coordinator 1, 2, 1, 6
7. Human Resources Department
7.1 Director of Human Resources 6
7.2 HUlnan Resources Analyst II 6
8. Department of Public Works
8.1 Director of Public Works 1, 2, 4, 6
8.3 Superintendents (Plant, Parks, Public Works) 1,2,4,6
8A Assistant Plant Superintendent 1,2,4,6
8.6 Senior Engineer (Public Works) 1, 2, 4, 6
8.7 Construction l\1anager 1, 2, 1, 6
8.7 Public Works Inspector 1, 2, 4, 6
8.8 Public Works Supervisor 1, 2, 4, 6
8.9 Environmental COlnpliance Coordinator 1, 2, 1, 6
8.9 Technical Services Supervisor 1, 2, 4, 6
8.10 Senior Enviromnental COlnpliance Inspector 1, 2, 4, 6
8.11 Enviromnental COlnpliance Inspector 1,2,4,6
9. Finance Department
9.1 Director of Finance 1,3,4,5
9.2 Assistant Finance Director 1,3,4,5
10. Fire Department
10.1 F ire Chief 6
10.2 Deputy Fire Chief 6
10.3 Battalion Chief 6
lOA Fire Marshal 1, 2, 4, 6
10.5 Assistant Fire Marshal 6
10.9 Fire Inspector 5
10.10 Senior Code Enforcelnent Officer +,2,4
10.11 Safety Inspector I, II, and III 1, 2, 4
2
11. Library Department
11.1 Library Director 6
11.2 Assistant Library Director 5
11.3 Project Read Director e
11.3 Literacy Program Manager 6
11.4 Library Program Manager 6
11.5 Supervising Librarian e
12. Recreation & Community Services De{>t
12.1 Director of Recreation & Community Services 1,2,4,6
12.2 Director of Parks, Recreation & Maintenance Services 1, 2, 1, 6
l2.3 Recreation & Community Services Manager 2,4,5,6
12.2 Superintendent ofRecreution & Community Services 2, 1, 5, 6
12.1 Deputy Director of Maintenance Services 1,2,1,5,6
13. Police Department
13.1 Chief of Police 6
13.2 Police Captain 6
13.3 Police Lieutenant 6
14. Consultants Form 700
15. Housing Authority
l5.1 Executive Director 1,2,4
16. Conference Center
16.l Executive Director 1
17. Information Technology Department
17.1 Director oflnformation Technology l,2,4,6
17.2 Information Technology Manager 6
3
~.
2006 Local Agency Biennial Notice
(}4 i ~ Jan, :frv/)(7~CO
PC), bny -7/1
Contact person: Sf Lr JI '0. Po. if "J.
E-mail: .QJ!tJIO. [)OIYlt' ~ ...s~r: net
I /
Name of Agency:
Mailing Address:
Office Phone No: bSO""67 7. ~ 5 J g
Fax No: bSb. t29. 0~<f/
This agency has reviewed its conflict-of-interest code and has determined that:
~An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary:
(Check all that apply)
X Include new positions (including consultants) that must be designated
o Delete positions that manage public investments from the list of designated positions
o Revise disclosure categories
X Revise the titles of existing positions
~ Delete titles of positions that have been abolished
o Other (describe)
o No amendment is required.
The agency's code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the making of
governmental decisions; the disclosure categories assigned to those positions accurately require the
disclosure of all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income
which may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding the designated
positions; and the cod~.i~~J.l,I.g~.s all other provisi.ons required by Government Code Section 87302.
&. //""- ..
--"\:: _ ,1\<, ( .' G ~~~~)
, l' ,.", .'f-)
. ,..</ Signaturf(6f Chief Executive Officer Date
Complete this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended.
Please return this notice no later than October 1, 2006 to:
~LACERETURNADDRESSOFCODEREWEWINGBODYHER~
Fair Political Practices Commission
(866) ASK-FPPC/www.fppc.ca.gov
Biennial Notice Locals - May 2006
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC.
-
~'t1l s::w
~
~ . ~\.t.\
o n
1>< ~
~ C')
v 0
GtlIFO~~\.~
AGENDA ITEM #8
Staff Report
DATE:
September 13, 2006
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Sharon Ranals, Recreation and Community Services Director
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF $30,000 IN FUNDING
FROM THE FRIENDS OF PARKS AND RECREATION TO CONTINUE
THE "FRESH" PROGRAM AND AMENDING THE 2006107 RECREATION
AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting a donation in the amount of
$30,000 from the Friends of Parks and Recreation, available through Kaiser Permanente to
continue the FRESH program, and amending the 2006/07 Recreation and Community Services
Department operating budget.
BACKGROUND:
The Recreation and Community Services Department, working in collaboration with the non-profit
group Friends of Parks and Recreation, has received a donation in the amount of $30,000 from Kaiser
Permanente to continue to operate the FRESH (Fitness, Recreation, Education, Socialization and Health)
program in our two preschools. This program addresses the issue of childhood obesity and focuses on
educating parents, children and staff on the importance of healthy eating and active living.
A $30,000 grant was awarded for the first time in 2005/06. Activities conducted during the first year
included a series of trainings and workshops for parents and staff, led by healthcare professionals, on
nutrition, health education and maintaining a physically active lifestyle. For example, cooking classes
were offered to provide parents with useful information and advice about the nutritional health of
children and the tools to create a fun learning environment in their kitchens at home. A workshop was
held with a pediatric dietitian from Kaiser Permanente who spoke to the parents about nurturing their
children with healthy food choices and fostering positive feeding relationships with their child. A
physical education teacher developed a program for young children which is taught at each site once a
week.
Prior to offering these workshops and classes, staff developed, distributed and collected questionnaires
Staff Report
Subject: Acceptance of $30,000 in Funding to Continue FRESH Program
September 13, 2006
Page 2
to assist in tracking changes in family life style and nutritional choices. This information will be
compiled by the Alinea Group and the California State University of the East Bay School of
Management and Finance. By continuing to offer this program to preschool aged children, it is hoped
that healthy eating and active living will become part of their lifestyle and aid in breaking the cycle of
obesity.
FUNDING:
Upon receipt, the funds will be used to amend this year's operating budget of the Recreation and
Community Services Department. Funds not expended at the end of fiscal year 2006/2007 will be
carried over into fiscal year 2007/2008. Receipt ofthese funds does not commit the city to ongoing
support after the close of the funding cycles.
CONCLUSION:
Kaiser Permanente is distributing funds through a broad range of local non-profit agencies with the goal
of addressing childhood obesity and encouraging patterns of healthy lifestyles. If approved, this
donation of $30,000 will be used to continue educating our preschool program participants through the
FRESH program. Staff and parents are very pleased with what this program has enabled the Department
to offer to date. Acceptance of this grant is recommended to continue in a positive direction.
By: ~,(JYl~
Sharon Ranals
Director of Recreation and
Community Services
Appro
Attachment:
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF $30,000 IN
FUNDING FROM THE FRlENDS OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TO CONTINUE THE "FRESH" PROGRAM AND AMENDING THE
2006/07 RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, staff recommends the acceptance of $30,000 in funding from the Friends of
Parks and Recreation through Kaiser Permanente to continue to support the FRESH program; and
amending the 2006/07 Recreation and Community Services Department operating budget; and
WHEREAS, the funds will be used in the City's childcare programs to continue to address
the issue of childhood obesity and focus on teaching the importance of healthy eating and active
living.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes acceptance of$30,000 in funding from the Friends
of Parks and Recreation to continue to support the FRESH program and amends the Recreation and
Community Services Department 2007/2008 operating budget.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council ofthe City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the
2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
---
AGENDA ITEM #9
Jrntlamattnn
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LOU POLETTI
and
WHEREAS, Lou Poletti is celebrating his 9dh binhday on August 18, 2006;
WHEREAS, born and raised in Colma, Califomia, Lou graduated from
Jefferson Grammar School, and attended one year at Jefferson High School before
becoming the proprietor of a barber shop on San Pedro Road from 1934-1941; imd
WHEREAS, Lou served as a Merchant Marine from 1941 to late 1945, and
traveled throughout the Pacific, with two briefvoyages to the East Coast via the
Panama Canal; and
WHEREAS, in 1948 Lou married Natalia J. Cabral and was blessed with
three children, one girl and two boys, and has seen his family grow to include eight
grandchildren, five boys and three girls; and
WHEREAS, Poletti Realty was first established in Daly City in 1956, then
was moved in 1962 to South San Francisco, where it proliferated and prospered,
making Lou one of the most respected land barons in San Mateo County; and
WHEREAS, although semi-retired, Lou still takes pleasure in paying a
weekly visit to his office at 333 El Camino Real, South San Francisco.
NOW, THEREFORE, L JosephA. Femekes, Mayor of the City of South San
Francisco, on behalfofthe City Council, do hereby proclaim August 18,2006, as
LOU POLETTI DAY
in South San Francisco in recognition of his dedication and devotion to the
community of South San Francisco, and join Lou's family and friends in
congratulating him upon the occasion of his 90th birthday.
Dated: August 18, 2006
-
~'t\\ S:1N
5
~ . ~~
o ~\
>- ~I
l;i C")
v 0
C'4.lIFO-p..~\.~
AGENDA ITEM #10
Staff Report
DATE: September 13, 2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sharon Ranals, Director of Recreation and Community Services
SUBJECT: ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK RECREATION BUILDING PROJECT:
BID GROUP A - SITEWORK PACKAGE, ENGINEERING Fll..,E NO. 51-13232-0526,
PROJECT NO. PB-05-1, BID NO. 2448
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding the construction
contract for the Orange Memorial Park Recreation Building Project, Bid Group A - Site
Work Package, Base Bid only, not including Alternate Bids, to Lister Construction Inc. of
Vacaville, California in the amount of $688,900.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The city was fortunate in 2005 to receive a competitive grant in the amount of $2.34 million from
the State of California Urban Park Act of2001. This grant, combined with per capita funds from the
Park Bond Act of2001 and developer fees, enabled the City Council to approve demolition of the
outdated recreation buildings at Orange Memorial Park to allow for construction of a new building,
basketball courts, and outdoor restroom. Replacement of the antiquated building was identified in
the city's 1990 Recreation and Open Space and the Orange Park Master Plans, and the 1997 Master
Plan update. It was identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission as a top priority. A total of
$4.3 million was allocated for the project in the 2006/07 Capital Improvement Program.
In June of 2005 the city retained Marcy Wong & Donn Logan Architects to design the new building
and surrounding improvements. A committee which included Mayor Fernekes, Councilmember
Matsumoto, and Parks and Recreation Commissioners Judy Bush and Janine Greenwald reviewed
and approved the selected design. The review committee expressed a desire for the design to be
distinctive and architecturally interesting. The design that was chosen is contemporary; high
ceilings and the use of glass connect the inside space to the outdoor park environment. Natural
materials, including wood and stone, have been incorporated to blend the building with the park
setting.
Staff Report
Subject: Awarding Construction Contract for Orange Memorial Park Recreation Building
September 13, 2006
Page 2
The demolished 2,300 square foot structure is to be replaced with a larger building of approximately
6,000 square feet. The new structure includes a large, multi-purpose activity space which is
approximately 60' by 60'. It can be converted into smaller spaces with sliding partitions. This
provides for greater programmability, and creates space for events and receptions. Staff offices,
storage space, and a commercial kitchen are included in the facility. The committee expressed a
desire for the most environmentally friendly building possible. A number of "green" features have
been incorporated in the building, however based on the high cost of some green features, the center
will not be certified as a LEED building as originally planned.
Site improvements include outdoor patio spaces for access by classes and rental groups. The project
also includes relocation of the basketball courts further west adjacent to Colma Creek. Mature
eucalyptus trees and a magnolia grove in the area have been retained, and landscape improvements
will enhance the site. A new set of stand-alone restrooms is planned to serve the new basketball
courts and adjacent soccer field. The area will also include new benches, lighting, and other site
improvements.
RGM and Associates was retained to manage bidding and construction as a "multi-prime" project.
The first phase of construction is the site work, packaged as Bid Group A. The scope of work
includes site grading to establish the building lines, grades and elevations; preparation of the
building site as specified by the soils report; new utility service connections; new underground
utilities; on-site electrical and lighting system; site amenities such as walkways, retaining walls and
seat walls; and drainage and a bioswale to meet pollution and flood control requirements.
Landscaping and irrigation work and surfacing of the basketball courts were bid as alternates.
On July 13, 2006 and July 20, 2006, staff advertised the notice to invite sealed bids for the project.
Staff conducted two mandatory site visits for the bidders on July 26,2006 and August 9, 2006, with
attendance required at one meeting. Staff and the construction manager reviewed the scope of the
work per the plans and specifications, reviewed the basis of the construction award, and answered
questions. The bid included two bid alternates. Bid alternate #l included the construction of new
landscaping, irrigation system and related work. Bid alternate #2 was for the installation of industry
standard basketball court surfacing.
Staff opened bids on August 17,2006 and four (4) bids were received. The base bid was used as the
basis of the award.
Base Bid Bid Alt. #1 Bid Alt. #2
Site Work Landscape Sports Surface
Engineer's Estimate (RGM): $ 754,724 $ 62,653 $ 20,000
Lister Construction Inc, Vacaville $ 688,900 $ 210,000 $ 16,500
Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc., SSF $ 887,900 $ 195,000 $ 11,500
Joseph J. Albanese Inc., Santa Clara $ 918,700 $ 187,000 $ 14,000
Golden Bay Construction, Inc, San Carlos $l,293,217 $ 295,375 $ 10,868
Staff Report
Subject: A warding Construction Contract for Orange Memorial Park Recreation Building
September 13, 2006
Page 3
The significant spread in the estimates was evaluated and reviewed with Lister Construction. The
company verified that they understand the scope of work and have not omitted any items. The low
bid is approximately 9% below the engineer's estimate for the site work.
Bids submitted from all of the contractors for Bid Alternate #l for landscaping are significantly
above the engineer's estimate. Staff, the architect, and the construction manager have evaluated this
discrepancy, and recommend that this bid alternate not be awarded at this time. The consensus is
that the bidding climate for landscape work will be more favorable in a few months, and this cost
could potentially be reduced either by bidding the landscaping as a separate package, or amending
the package of amenities to be included. By deferring this award until after the outcome of the next,
most significant, building bid package is known, the city retains more flexibility in controlling the
overall budget. Staff will also be re-evaluating the engineer's estimate prior to making an award on
this component.
The bid received from Lister Construction for Bid Alternate #2 for the final sport surface of the
basketball courts, $16,500, was under the engineer's estimate of $20,000. However, staff is not
recommending award of this alternate at this time because it is believed that some savings could be
accomplished in this area.
The second phase of construction will be to bid and award Bid Group B - Building Construction
Package. This phase will involve awarding various construction contracts (18 contracts) to multiple
prime contractors for various scopes of work. Bid Group B - Building Construction Package is
scheduled to be advertised for public bidding in September, 2006. RGM and Associates, the
Construction Manager for the project, will manage each of the contractors with the multiple-prime
contracts.
For multiple-prime contracts (similar to the new Central Fire Station project), the Construction
Manager will divide the construction documents into multiple packages for bidding by contractors
from various trades, and plan and manage the activities of all the contractors. If one construction
activity has to be modified, it will be managed so as not to negatively impact other contractors
working on the project. This form of construction provides more flexibility for the construction
schedule and better management of change orders with the intent of a lower construction cost and an
acceptable construction completion schedule.
FUNDING:
A review of the funding sources for this project is provided below:
Staff Report
Subject: Awarding Construction Contract for Orange Memorial Park Recreation Building
September 13, 2006
Page 4
$2,340,000
268,000
165,000
357,000
419,000
750,000
$4,299,000
Urban Park Act Grant Funds - Competitive
Per Capita Park Bond Grant Funds, (Non-competitive)
Roberti-Z'Berg Park Bond Block Funds, (Non-competitive)
Zone IV Developer Fees, on hand
Stonegate Developer Park-in-Lieu Fees, Zone IV, anticipated receipt in 2006/07
Fairfield Developer Park-in-Lieu Fees, Zone IV, anticipated receipt in 2006/07
Total
Shown below is the cost breakdown for Bid Package A:
Lister Construction, Inc. Bid Amount
Add 12.5% Contingency and Miscellaneous
Project Budget Cost (Bid Package A)
$ 688,900
$ 86,000
$ 774,900
As noted previously in this report, this project is included in the City of South San Francisco's
2006/07 Capital Improvement Program.
CONCLUSION:
Approval of this project will prepare the site for the actual construction of the Orange Memorial
Park Recreation Building. Awarding the contract to Lister Construction, Inc. is consistent and
within the limits of the Engineer's estimate. The project will be coordinated and inspected by city
staff in accordance with the plans and specifications.
By: ,114m fIw~
Sharon Ranals
Director of Recreation and
Community Services
Approved by
Attachments:
Resolution
Bid Summary Spreadsheet
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT, BID GROUP A - SITE WORK PACKAGE,
BASE BID ONLY TO LISTER CONSTRUCTION INe.
IN THE AMOUNT OF $688,900 FOR THE ORANGE
MEMORIAL P ARK RECREATION BUILDING
PROJECT NO. PB-05-l, BID NO. 2448
WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the Construction Contract, Bid Group A - Site
Work Package Base Bid only, not including Alternate Bids, to Lister Construction Inc. of
Vacaville, California in the amount of$688,900 for the construction of the Orange Memorial
Park Recreation Building; and
WHEREAS, funding for the project budget is included as part of the 2006/07 Capital
Improvement Program. Below is the breakdown of the project budget:
$2,340,000
268,000
165,000
357,000
419,000
7'50)000
$4,299,000
Urban Park Act Grant Funds - Competitive
Per Capita Park Bond Grant Funds - Non-Competitive
Roberti-Z'berg Park Bond Block Funds - Non-Competitive
Zone IV Developer Fees, on hand
Stonegate Developer Park-in-Lieu Fees, Zone IV, anticipated receipt in 2006/07
Fairfield Developer Park-in-Lieu Fees, Zone IV, anticipated receipt in 2006/07
Total
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby awards the Construction Contract, Bid Group A - Site
Work Package, Base Bid only, not including Alternate Bids, to Lister Construction Inc. in the
amount of $688,900 for the construction ofthe Orange Memorial Park Recreation Building.
*
*
*
*
*
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council ofthe City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Rec Bldg 9-06 CA Version (405-001)
...
u
CIl
-e-;
c.. -
O)<C
t: a.
._ :J
o " 0
(.) =...
en :J C)
'u III ell
t: t: 0)
l! .~ ~
u. ~ g
lij l!! c..
rng~
=0::0
:J~:1i:
~ nl CIl
....n.;t::
o nl 1Il
Z. ';: ~
U~~
CIl .
:E 0
CIlZ
0)"
lijiii
...
o
>-
nl 0
t: >
nl(ij
gu
o .~ lD
"3(ijO
nl en 0
0:: ON
..0::"':
>-.....
,Q >-...
" ,Q en
CIl,,:J
~ ~ ~
a.en<C
o ~ Qj
"0==10
iii:1i:o
0
C!
c; ....l r--
-
= ~ N
>>..... '"
~ ::
=:l 0 0-,
,~ E-< "'!.
= .... -
Q,l CJ .",
"0 =
'0 ..
....
c.:J = E-<~
'" -u
Q Z-
U ~i:z::
""
0
c; 0
= ~ 0
..... 0
qj r--.
E-< 00
'" 0 -
Q,l 0-,
= E-<
~
,Q
- .",
<
...;
.= E-<~
Co -u
Q,l Z-
'" ~i:z::
Q ""
..,
0
0
0($ ....l 0
0
e.c < 0-,
= E-< r-:
:a c; 0 00
00
~ = E-<
.. .....
c.:J ~ ""
Q,l =
.... '>
~
.... ~
'" ~ E-<~
..
Q,l -u
.... Z;l
=
..... ~""
c; 0
0
= ....l 0
..... 0
= < 0-,.
.~ E-< 00
0 00
.... '-0
CJ E-<
=
..
.... .",
'"
=
Q
U E-<~
.. -u
Q,l Z;l
....
'" ~""
~
0
0
Q,l .f
.... ~ N
~
.5 r--
E-< ..,f
V)
.... 0 r--
'"
~ E-<
'"
-.. .",
Q,l
Q,l
= E-<~
'6'.0 -u
= Z;l
~ ~""
8
=
00
., c..
'; 8
Q,l ~ =
6 ., ....l
-= I
~ '"
Z 00 ~
~ -
'" Pil ~
.. ~
Q,l
"0 00
"0 <
= ~
..
., 00
~ ,Q ~
Pil 8 ~
= N
Z
o
o
vi
r--
<')
.,.,
0-,
N
.",
o
o
o
o
o
r-:
00
.",
o
o
o
o
o
.,.,
0-,
.",
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
.", .",
o
C!
<')
V)
'-0
N
'-0
.",
c.:l
Z
-
""
.<
Ou
ZOO
~~
-~
~....l
~,-,
E-<~
<>
~~
~-
E-<~
....l~
<S
.",
.",
""
N
o
Z
~
-
~
~
E-<~
<f;o;l
~oo
f;o;l~
E-<E-<
....l0
<Z
.",
0
0
00
'-0
00
0
-
.",
0
0
0
0
0
:i
.",
0
0
0
0
V1.
-
-
.",
0
0
0
0
V)
-.0
-
""
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
""
<'l
000
ZE-<
~i:z::
_0
~""
f;o;l~c.:l
E-<f;o;lZ
<>-
~-u
~E::<
E-<~~
....l~~
< '-' 00
0
0
0
'-0
'<t
0\ ~ ~ ~
0-,
V1.
.",
0
0
0
0
r--
0\ ~ ~ ~
-
-.
.",
0
0
0
0
'<t
'<to ~ ~ ~
0-,
o.
""
0
0
0
0
'<t
.,., ~ ~ ~
-
0-,
""
0
C!
r--
r--
<')
r-: ~ ~ ~
<')
00
.",
~ ~
c
- N ~
~ .... N ()
+ o(l 0 0 '"
'c
~ .... :>
Z Z ~ E
-00 g
~... ~ ~ Z
f;o;lE-< 0 II
~ ~ ~
00< ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ z
Z Z ~ ::F
f;o;l f;o;l - J,
~~ ~ ~ ~ 0
cO
~ ~ <l.
E-<....l < ~
0< ~
E-< 'e
<l.
'"
0
J:
AGENDA ITEM # 11
DATE: September 13, 2006
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney
By: Brian F. Crossman, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING CITY'S OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 90 IN THE
NOVEMBER 7, 2006 GENERAL ELECTION
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached resolution expressing City's opposition to Proposition 90 in the November 7, 2006 General
Election
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
At the City Council meeting of August 9, 2006, Assistant City Attorney Peter Spoerl presented a report on
Proposition 90, which has been certified for inclusion on the November 7, 2006 General Election ballot. If
approved, Proposition 90 would amend the California Constitution to limit government authority to take
ownership of private property, and require government to pay property owners for substantial economic losses
resulting from certain new laws and regulations, including zoning regulations. The California Legislative
Analyst's Office has concluded that approval of Proposition 90 would likely result in local governments
incurring additional costs as a result of exercising their power of eminent domain.
At the August 9, 2006 meeting, the City Council requested that the City Attorney's office prepare a resolution
expressing the City Council's opposition to the measure. The requested resolution is attached for the City
Council's consideration and adoption.
)
Enclosure: Resolution expressing City's opposition to Proposition 90 in the November 7, 2006 General
Election
850863 1
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSITION 90 IN THE NOVEMBER 7, 2006
GENERAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, Proposition 90, "Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment," has been certified for inclusion on the November 7, 2006
General Election ballot; and
WHEREAS, if approved, Proposition 90 would amend the California Constitution to
limit government authority to take ownership of private property, and require government to pay
property owners for substantial economic losses resulting from certain new laws and regulations,
including zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the power of eminent domain is important to effective and efficient local
government, and to redevelopment agencies in particular; and
WHEREAS, the Legislative Analyst's Office has concluded that approval of Proposition
90 would likely result in local governments incurring additional costs as a result of exercising
their power of eminent domain; and
WHEREAS, in response to fears regarding the taking of private party, and in particular,
private residences, the City already has established policies to ensure appropriate use of eminent
domain power
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby expresses its opposition to State Proposition 90.
*
*
*
*
*
850860 1
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
_ day of , 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
850860 1
ATTEST:
City Clerk