The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006-09-27 e-packet AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,2006 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, . California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for. investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Mayor RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR Vice Mayor MARK N. ADDIEGO Councilman PEDRO GONZALEZ Councilman KARYLMATSUMOTO Councilwoman RICHARD BATTAGLIA City Treasurer SYLVIA M. PAYNE City Clerk BARRY M. NAGEL City Manager STEVENT. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS · Wireless Silicon Valley/Samcat WiFi Update - Information Technology Director Doug Hollis · Annual Beautification Awards - presented by Beautification Committee Chair Saundra Nichols AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL . Announcements · Committee Reports CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of September 13, 2006 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 27,2006 3. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of funding from the Woodlawn Foundation and Reading is Fundamental, Inc. to support Project Read services in the amount of $26,000 4. Resolution certifying the mitigated negative declaration for Wet Weather Program Phase II 5. Resolution expressing support for Propositions lA, 1B, 1C, 1D, and IE and Proposition 84 in the November 7,2006 General Election 6. Acknowledgement of proclamation issued: Genentech, Inc. 30th Anniversary, 9/15/06 PUBLIC HEARING 7. Resolution authorizing submittal of the 2005-06 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 8. Consideration of appeal of Planning Commission decision to deny use permit allowing a mobile computerized tomography imaging unit at the rear of the Kaiser Medical Center situated at 1200 El Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81 ; Owner/Applicant: Kaiser Permanente REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27,2006 PAGE 2 9. Consideration of annual child care fee increase in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.115.030. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 10. Year end financial results and budget closing for 2005-06 COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 PAGE 3 - ~'tl\ s:4.N . S I~ 8 \~ ~ u c ~11!2Y-~" Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #3 DATE: September 27, 2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Valerie Sommer, Library Director SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,000 FROM THE WOODLAWN FOUNDATION AND READING IS FUNDAMENTAL, INC. TO SUPPORT PROJECT READ SERVICES AND AMENDING THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT'S 2006/2007 OPERATING BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting funding in the amount of $25,000 from the Woodlawn Foundation and $1,000 from Reading is Fundamental, Inc. (RIF) to support Project Read services, and amending the Library Department's operating budget for fiscal year 2006/2007. BACKGROUND: Project Read has been awarded $25,000 in funding from the Woodlawn Foundation. Funds will be used to provide obesity prevention programs for parents who visit Learning Wheels and will include story times, exercises, and information on how to make healthy food choices for the family. The material in this program is designed at an easy-to-understand level and is ready to use in the family environment. The Woodlawn Foundation has been a Project Read partner and has provided funding for Learning Wheels for the last four years. Project Read has been awarded $1,000 in funding from Reading is Fundamental, Inc. (RIF) to support Learning Wheels. Funds will be used to purchase books that will be distributed for free to low-income families in South San Francisco, Daly City, San Bruno, and Colma. Founded in 1966, RIF is the oldest and largest children and family nonprofit literacy organization in the United States. RIF's highest priority is reaching underserved children from birth to age eight (8). FUNDING: Grant funds received in fiscal year 2006/2007 will be used to amend the Library Department's current budget. Funds not expended by the end of fiscal year 2006/2007 will be carried over into fiscal year 200712008. Receipt of these funds does not commit the city to ongoing funding after the close of the grant cycle. Staff Report Subject: Acceptance of $26,000 in grant funding to support Project Read Page 2 CONCLUSION: Receipt of these funds will enable Project Read to continue programs and services which are not otherwise funded and will provide the community with additional literacy services. It is recommended that the City Council accept $26,000 in grant funding to support Project Read and amend the Library Department's fiscal year 2006/2007 operating budget. Valerie Sommer Library Director APProVGq ( ~=) - M. agel City Manager By: ~~.< ~ RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF $26,000 IN FUNDING FROM THE WOODLAWN FOUNDATION AND READING IS FUNDAMENTAL, INC. TO SUPPORT PROJECT READ SERVICES AND AMENDING THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT'S 2006/2007 OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, staff recommends the acceptance of $25,000 in grant funding from the Woodlawn Foundation and $1,000 in grant funding from Reading is Fundamental, Inc. to support Project Read's Learning Wheels; and WHEREAS, the funds will be used to amend this year's operating budget of the Library Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby accepts $25,000 in grant funding from the Woodlawn Foundation and $1,000 from Reading is Fundamental, Inc. to support Project Read programming and amends the 2006/2007 Operating Budget, to reflect an increase of $26,000 to the Library Department's budget. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the _day of , 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk ~ 't l\ s:4.N S (0 n >-< ..... ~ ~ u c C'. ~~ 4lIFOF-~ AGENDA ITEM #4 Staff Re120rt DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 27, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager WET WEATHER PHASE IT - APPROVAL OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECOMMENDA TION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Wet Weather Phase II project. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City of South San Francisco proposes to undertake a number of improvements to sewer pipes in portions of the community to meet San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards. The Wet Weather Program was initiated to remediate a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in 1997. The CDO requires controlling overflows from the sewer system for up to a 5-year storm event. The basis for the Wet Weather Program is a Sewer System Evaluation Survey completed by Montgomery Watson in 1994 and an Infiltration and Inflow (1&1) study completed by Carollo Engineers in 1999. The 1&1 study recommended several projects to be included in the Wet Weather Program. The Wet Weather Program consists of four phases: Phase I (completed) - Pump Station Improvements, Parallel Force Mains and an Effluent Storage Pond; Phase IT (under design) - Sewer Rehabilitation and Relief Sewers; Phase ill (completed) - Colma Creek Bank Restoration; and Phase IV (under design) - East of Highway 101 Sewer System Improvements. Phase IT of the wet weather program consists of replacing existing and installing new sanitary sewer lines west of Highway 101. The underground sewer pipe lines are located on Hillside Boulevard, Portola Avenue, Francisco Drive, Victory Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, Westborough Boulevard, Camaritas A venue, First Street, B Street, Airport Boulevard, Cypress A venue, South Linden A venue, Mission Road and South Maple A venue. Sewer pipes are also proposed to be replaced in various public utility easements and within a portion of Orange Memorial Park. Sewer replacement will be by trenchless methods and open cut depending on location. The estimated construction cost for the project is approximately $6,500,000. Staff Report Subject: WET WEATHER PHASE II- APPROVAL OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Page 2 of 3 In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City policy, an Initial Study was prepared to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project consistent with CEQA Guidelines. Based on the Initial Study, the City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) dated July 2006 (attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein) and circulated the Initial Study/MND for public review for a 30-day period between August 1 and September 1,2006. The MND analyzed potential visual impacts, air quality impacts, geology and soil impacts, hazardous materials, noise, public services, traffic, and utilities. On the basis of the MND, it has been determined that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse effect because the mitigation measures in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the project. The City has received one comment letter (Exhibit B), from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), requesting that the project be coordinated with them to lessen the impacts upon their facilities. All reasonable efforts will be made to coordinate with PG&E to ensure that their facilities will not be impacted by this project. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared and is attached as Exhibit C. All documents are available in the Engineering Division. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, completed in compliance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, is complete and adequate and reflects the City's independent judgment as to the environmental effects of the Phase II Wet Weather project. FUNDING This project is funded by the State Revolving fund (SRF) and the City's sanitary sewer fund and is included as part of the 06-07 CIP. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Phase II, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program consisting of Exhibits A, B, and C as described heretofore and incorporated herein by reference. By: Approved: Marty Van Duyn Assistant City Ma RR/DC/rc Attachment: Resolution Exhibits: A) Mitigated Negative Declaration B) Pacific Gas & Electric letter and response C) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PHASE II WET WEATHER PROGRAM GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF THE 101 FREEWAY WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco proposes to undertake a number of improvements to sewer pipes in portions of the community to meet San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards; and WHEREAS, underground sewer pipes are proposed to be replaced within the following public streets: Hillside Boulevard, Portola Avenue, Francisco Drive, Victory A venue, Del Monte Avenue, Westborough Boulevard, Camaritas A venue, First Street, B Street, Airport Boulevard, Cypress Avenue, South Linden Avenue, Mission Road and South Maple Avenue. Sewer pipes are also proposed to be replaced in various public utility easements and within a portion of Orange Memorial Park; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. Based on the Initial Study, the City prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration dated July 2006 (attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein) and circulated the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for public review for a 30-day period between August 1 and September 1, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City received one comment letter during the public review period. The comment letter and response is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Staff Report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the response thereto at a regular City Council meeting held on September 27, 2006; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as required by CEQA, is contained in attached Exhibit C, and is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings for the project is the City of South San Francisco, Engineering Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby finds as follows: A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. B. The potential environmental effects of the Phase IT Wet Weather project have been analyzed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the application of mitigation measures identified in the Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration. These mitigation measures are also reflected in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which ensures that mitigations will be implemented at the proper time by the appropriate agency or department. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project as mitigated could have a significant effect on the environment. C. The Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines. D. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete and adequate and reflects the City's independent judgment as to the environmental effects of the Phase IT Wet Weather project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based on the aforementioned findings, the City Council hereby adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Phase IT Wet Weather project, consisting of Exhibits A and B, as described heretofore and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as set forth in Exhibit C, which is incorporated herein by reference, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of South San Francisco. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a Regular Meeting of the South San Francisco City Council on the day of September 27, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Page 2 ATTEST: City Clerk Page 3 Mayor Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Phase II Wet Weather Project Lead Agency: City of South San Francisco Prepared By: Jerry Haag, Urban Planner July 2006 Exhibit A Table of Contents Introduction ........... ........ .................. .......... ..... .......................................... ... ........... .......2 Applicant/ Contact Person. ....... ........... ..... ........ ...... ...................................... ............ ...2 Project Location and Context ......... ....... ...... ........ .................. ...... ........ ........................2 Project Description........................................................................................................2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................... .......... ............ ....... ....... ..10 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts .......................................................................12 Attachment to Initial Study... ...... ............ ............. ................................... .......... ... .......24 1. Aesth.etics .... .......... ......... ............. .............. ............................. .............. ..24 2. Agricultural Resources.. ...................... ......... ........ ............................. ...24 3. Air Quality.. ........... ......................... .............................. ..... ................... .25 4. Biological Resources........................... .... ................... ........... .............. ..30 5. Cultural Resources...................................... ................... ......... .......... ....33 6. Geology and Soils........ ...... ................................................. ......... ......... .39 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials.. .... .................... ........... .............. ..41 8. Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................43 9. Land Use and Planning.... ............ .................................... .............. .... ..45 10. Mineral Resources ........ ............. ...... ........ .... ......................... ............... ..47 11. Noise .. ......... .... ............... .... .... ........ ...... ... ........ ....... ............................. ....47 12. Population and Housing. .................. ........................ ....... .................. ..49 13. Public Services... ............ ...... ....... ..... .......................... ............. ....... ...... ..52 14. Recreation..... ........................... ..... ...... ........... ................ ............... ...... ....52 15. Transportation/ Traffic .................. ........................ ...... .... ........... ........ ..52 16. Utilities and Service Systems.... ............ .................. ........... .......... ........54 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance ..................................................55 16. Alternatives .............. .......... .............. ......... ................... ..... .......... .......... .56 Initial Study Preparers..... ....................... ......... ........ ............ ....... .... ............... ............ ...57 Agencies and Organizations Consulted ..................................... ........... ............... .....57 References................................................................... ................................................... .57 Appendix 1........ .......... .......... ...... ............ ............. ...... ............ .......................... ........... ...58 Appendix 2.................................................................................................................... .59 Appendix 3.................................................................................................................... .60 City of South San Francisco Environmental Checklist/ Initial Study Introduction This Initial Study has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist. Applicant/Contact Person City of South San Francisco Public Works Department 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco CA 94083 Attn: Ray Razavi, City Engineer Project Location and Context The project is sited in the central portion of South San Francisco within San Mateo County. The proposed project includes a number of related construction improvements located west of US 101. Most of the proposed improvements are located within existing roadway rights-of-way. Other improvements would occur within dedicated easements. Exhibit 1 depicts the regional setting of South San Francisco and Exhibit 2 shows the location of project components in context with the larger City of South San Francisco. Land uses adjacent to proposed improvements are generally residential, industrial or commercial in nature. Project Description Project history and background The City of South San Francisco provides a comprehensive sanitary sewer system to serve the community. Major components of this system include sewer laterals and trunks to collect wastewater from individual dwellings, businesses and industrial operations and transport this effluent to the City's Water Quality Control Plan (WQCP) located at the terminus of Belle Air Road, east of US 101. A number of pump stations are also maintained by the City to ensure that effluent maintains a continuous flow to the WQCP. Following treatment at the WQCP, treated effluent is disposed of in San Francisco Bay via an outfall pipe. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 2 The WQCP is presently operating under a Cease and Desist Order issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board in 1997. The Order notes that Plant equipment is dated and no longer complies with current discharge requirements. The Order also notes that the wastewater collection system (sewer system) receives high inflows during the rainy season of each year. This is due to older, leaky pipes and various cross-connections between storm drains and the sewer system. Because of this, the system is inadequate to convey sewage during the rainy season. The Order establishes milestones to be met by the plant operator to comply with state and federal discharge requirements into San Francisco Bay. The City completed construction of WQCP improvements in May, 2002. The project upgraded treabnent processes and provided peak wet weather flow facilities. The dry weather capacity of the upgraded plant is 13.0 mgd. The completed project did not, however, include upgrade of deficiencies associated with the local sewage collection system. In addition, several portions of the City's sewer system in the East of 101 geographic area of the City were identified as older and in need of replacement. This includes older pumping stations and underground sewer lines. Phase V of the W et Weather Program remediated many of these older facilities in 2003~04. Proposed improvements The current project is identified as the Wet Weather Phase II project and is intended to replace older underground sewer pipes that have been identified as failing or are anticipated to fail in the near future. The proposed project is not intended to increase the overall wastewater treabnent and/ or disposal capacity of the City's wastewater treabnent plant. Localized wastewater collection facilities may be increased in size to replace existing failing facilities and to accommodate proposed expansion of local business in accord with the South San Francisco General Plan. Wet weather project components Proposed Phase II Improvements include the following specific portions of South San Francisco. Unless otherwise noted, sewer pipe replacements would be accomplished by pipe "bursting," which is a technology that does not require full trenching of the ground above the pipe, but is a process whereby a cone-shaped bursting head is forced into an existing pipe, expanding the surrounding soil allowing the insertion of a new pipe of desired size. Typically, for this technology, excavation is required at either end of the affected pipe, at manholes and laterals. . Hillside Subtrunk. This portion of the project would include replacing an existing 8-inch diameter sewer pipe with a 12-inch diameter pipe within the Hillside Avenue right-of-way. The length of the pipe is anticipated to be approximately 900 feet. . Westborough Subtrunk. This portion of the project would include replacing an existing 8-inch diameter pipe along Del Monte Avenue from Nyla Avenue to Arroyo Drive with a 12-inch diameter pipe. Replacement IS-inch diameter pipes City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 3 would also be placed in Arroyo Drive from Del Monte to an existing public utilities easement just west of Camaritas Avenue within this Public Utilities Easement from Arroyo Drive to Westborough Boulevard, and in Westborough Boulevard from this Public Utilities Easement to and continuing in a second easement paralleling Westborough Boulevard to EI Camino Real, crossing EI Camino real, a City of San Francisco Public Utility Commission water main and BART, proceeding to Chestnut Street to the existing sewer trunk line in Mission Boulevard. The last three portions of this sub trunk would replace and existing 12-inch diameter pipe. An alternative alignment for the segments downstream of Del Monte Avenue is being investigated and is likely to be adopted. This alignment would continue the Arroyo Drive segment, within Arroyo Drive from the above-indicated public utilities easement which is just west of Camaritas Avenue, to EI Camino Real, crossing EI Camino Real and proceeding within the proposed Oak Avenue extension right-of-way to Mission Road. One of the benefits of this alternative routing is to avoid work in the easement behind existing commercial uses, including a bank and gas station/ car wash. This alternative alignment would not be using existing mains for pipe bursting and would require open trenching. The existing sewer line in Mission Road from Oak Avenue to Chestnut Street may also be upsized using pipe bursting technology. . First Street Subtrunk. This portion of the project would include replacing existing sewer pipes in First Street from EI Camino Real to the San Francisco Water Department right-of-way, then splitting with a portion of the replacement line extending along a portion of B Street turning northeast and ending along a short stretch of Second Street terminating at the San Francisco Water Department right-of-way. A portion of the First Street subtrunk would extend through the San Francisco Water Department easement and through the City of South San Francisco's Orange Memorial Park. . Airport Subtrunk. The Airport Subtrunk would include replacement of older sewer pipes within Airport Boulevard, Baden Avenue and Linden Avenue as shown on Exhibit 3. . Portola and Victory Subtrunks. These portions of the project would include upgrading sewer lines in Portola Avenue from El Camino Real to Francisco Drive and in a portion of Francisco Drive from Portola Avenue to Sonora Avenue. A second portion of this sub trunk would include sewer pipe replacement in Victory Avenue from South Spruce Street to South Linden A venue. An alternative to this second portion of the project may be to trench a new sewer line in South Maple Avenue to Victory Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet southerly to an existing sewer line in an existing public utility easement. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 4 Phasing of improvements The proposed project is anticipated to be phased over two construction seasons, beginning construction early 2007, assuming all necessary approvals are granted and funding is approved. Proposed funding Funding of the wet weather improvement portion of the project is proposed to be through the California State Water Resources Control Board's State Revolving Loan Fund loan program. This will consist of a low interest, 20-year term loan, to be re-paid from City-wide sewer revenues. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 5 8 N '" .0 ~ .2 '0 (J ~ Q <! .. '" ~ 1:; "' .~ ~ ~ ~ a Exhibit 1 REGIONAL LOCATION CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION N ! A o I 2 , 4 . 6 , 8 , 10 miles I 'mi!e ..., Exhibit 2 PROJECT LOCATIONS SOUf?CE: 3/4 112 114 o I CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SOURCE: Exhibit 3a HillSIDE SUBTRUNK CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Not to Beale \ SOURCE: City of South San Francisco. 01-04-2006. ( Exhibit 3b CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PORTOlA SUBTRUNK Not to Bcale SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. Exhibit 3c CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION VICTORY SUBTRUNK f Ilot to _ City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. WESTBOROUGH SUBTRUNK CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK 7 .0 SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. Exhibit 3e CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIRST STREET SUBTRUNK SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. Exhibit 31 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Sister Cities to Linden Not to scale SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. Exhibit 39 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Linden to Sixth SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 01-04-2006. Exhibit 3h CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Sixth to Commercial 1. Project description: Upgrading substandard portions of the South San Francisco sewer collection system to accommodate peak wet weather sewer flows in the west of 101 portion of the community. 2. Lead agency: City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Street South San Francisco CA 94083 3. Contact person: Ray Razavi, City Engineer (650) 829- 6652 4. Project location: Generally located west of US 101 Freeway in the central and northern portions of South San Francisco 5. Project sponsor: City of South San Francisco 6. General Plan designation: Varies: Residential, Commercial, Light Industrial and Public Use land use designations 7. Zoning: Varies: Residential, Commercial, Light Industrial and Public Use districts 8. Public agency required approvals: . Approval of Negative Declaration (City of South San Francisco) . Approval of Improvement Plans and Bid results (City of South San Francisco) . Encroachment permit for work in US 101 right-of-way (Caltrans) . Approval of project funding (State Water Resources Control Board) City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 9 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. - Aesthetics - Agricultural x Air Quality Resources - Biological x Cultural Resources x Geology /Soils Resources x Hazards and - Hydrology / Water x Land Use/ Hazardous Quality Planning Materials - Mineral Resources x Noise - Population/ Housing - Public Services - Recreation x Transportation/ Circulation - Utilities / Service - Mandatory Systems Findings of Significance Determination (to be completed by Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: _ I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and the previous Negative Declaration certified for this project by the City of South San Francisco adequately addresses potential impacts. --X- I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on the attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An Environmental Impact Report is required, but must only analyze the effects that remain to be addressed. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 10 ElR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed on the proposed proj ed. Signatu,,, ,L7 ~;; Printed Name: Si<.rl/ ;!..,ILJ-.. / Date: vly, I~. UJO' For: r;'~ 1/ s.......llch... {;....., (JA ~e 0 City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 11 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "no impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parenthesis following each question. A "no impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "no impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general factors (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less-than-significant with mitigation, or less-than-significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less-than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less-than-Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less-than-significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identity and state where they are available for reVIew. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less- Than-Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 12 general plans, zoning ordinances, etc.). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is a suggested form and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each agency should identify the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question and the mitigation measures identified, if any, to reduce the impact to a less than significant level. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 13 Environmental Impacts (Note: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing of sources used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist) Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. I. Aesthetics. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista? (Source: 1,6) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source: 1,56 c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source: 6) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Source: 6) II. Agricultural Resources Would the project: . a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as showing on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use? (Source: 1) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Source: 1) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use? (Source: 1) III. Air Quality (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district may be relied on to make the following determinations). Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Source: 2) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source: 2) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation X X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 14 c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (2) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Source:2, 6) e) Create objectionable odors? (Source: 2,6) IV. Biological Resources. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 2, 3) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 2,3) c) Have a substantial adverse impact on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means? (Source: 2, 3) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Source: 2, 3) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree protection ordinances? (Source: 2, 3) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 15 f) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? (Source: 1) V. Cultural Resources. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? (Source: 7) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to Sec. 15064.5 (Source: 7) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? (Source: 7) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? (Source: 7) VI. Geology and Soils. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist or based on other known evidence of a known fault (Source: 2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (2) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (2,) iv) Landslides? (2,6) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (2, 6) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- and off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or similar hazards (Source: 2) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 13-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Source: 2) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitil!ation X X X X X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase \I Wet Weather Page 16 e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste? (Source: 7) VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials (Source: 7) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous into the environment? (Source: 7) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Source: 7) d) Belocated on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Source: 7) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such plan has not been adopted, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Source: 2) f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Source: 2) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with the adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source: 2, 5) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitie:ation X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 17 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Source: 6) IX. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Source: 2, 5) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g. the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (Source: 2, 5) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the aeration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? (Source: 8, 5) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas, including through the alteration of a course or stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? (Source: 5, 6) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Source: 5, 6) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Source: 5) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? (Source: 2) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Miti!!:ation X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 18 h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which impede or redirect flood flows? (Source: 2) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, and death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (2) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (2) IX. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Source: 1, 2, 6) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Source: 1, 2) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ;natural community conservation plan? (1,2,6) X. Mineral Resources. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source: 1, 2) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source: 1,2) XI. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Source: 2) b) Exposure of persons or to generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Source: 2, 10) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without the project? (Source: 2,10) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitieation X X X X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 19 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? (Source:2) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working n the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 2) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 2) XII. Population and Housing. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source: 7) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (7) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the replacement of housing elsewhere? (Source: 7) XIII. Public Services. Would the proposal: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? (Sources: 1,2,5) Fire protection Police protection Schools Parks Other public facilities Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation X X X X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 20 XIV. Recreation: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated (Source: 2) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Source: 2) XV. Transportation and Traffic. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections)? (2, 5) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways? (2) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (5) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, such as farm equipment? (5) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (6) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (6) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (such as bus turnouts and bicycle facilities) (1) Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitil!ation X X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 21 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (2) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (2, 5) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (5) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing water entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (2) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? (5) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (2) g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (2) XVI. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation X X X X X X X X City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 22 c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation X X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts 1. South San Francisco General Plan 2. South San Francisco General Plan Existing Conditions Report 3. Improvement Plans for Proposed Project 4. Discussion with City staff or service provider 5. Site Visit 6. Other Source XVII. Earlier Analyses b Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Reference Section 15063 (c)(3)(d). a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this Initial Study refer to environmental information contained in the General Plan and General Plan EIR (1999) (SCH#97122030), available for review at the South San Francisco Planning Deparbnent, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, during normal business hours. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 23 Attachment to Initial Study Discussion of Checklist 1. Aesthetics Environmental Setting The project is set in a largely urbanized portion of the community, characterized by commercial land uses (along Airport Boulevard and Westborough Boulevard), industrial uses (along South Linden Avenue and Hillside Drive) residential uses (along Del Monte Avenue, First Street, Second Street, and Portola Avenue), public uses (along portions of Arroyo Drive). All of the project area has been developed and no significant or unusual aesthetic features are found within the project site, including unusual rock outcroppings or major scenic vistas. As a largely developed area, a number of light sources exist within the project area, primarily street and freeway lights, building and yard lights associated with existing development. Project Impacts a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista? NI. The proposed project includes subsurface work associated with sewer pipe replacement. No impacts or changes to scenic vistas would occur should the proposal be implemented. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including state scenic highway? NI. No changes to scenic resources are proposed, since all of the proposed work is intended to be subsurface so no impacts are anticipated with regard to this topic. c) Substantially degrade existing visual character or the quality of the site? NI. The project area has been previously developed for a mix of commercial, industrial, residential and similar uses. Proposed construction would be below ground. There would therefore be no impacts to the existing visual character or quality of the project area. d) Create light or glare? NI. A number of light sources presently exist within the project area. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on new sources of light and glare, since new construction would be below grade. No impacts are anticipated with regard to light and glare. 2. Agricultural Resources Environmental Setting The project area has been developed for a number of years for primarily commercial, residential and light industrial uses. Although underlying soils may support agriculture, no crops have not been cultivated in many years nor have any portions of the project area been used for animal grazing. No Williamson Act conservation agreements have been signed for properties affected by this project, since the great City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 24 majority of the land is owned by public agencies. No agricultural zoning had been adopted for any portion of the project area by the City of South San Francisco. Project Impacts a-c) Convert Prime Farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning or agriculture land use or convert prime farmland to a non-agricultural use? NI. The project area lies in a highly urbanized area of South San Francisco and there would be no impact with regard to agricultural uses, zoning or Williamson Act agreements. 3. Air Quality (Note: This section of the Initial Study is based on an air quality analysis prepared by Donald Ballanti, an air quality specialist, which is found in the Appendix of this document.) Environmental Setting Air pollution climatology The amount of a given pollutant in the atmosphere is determined by the rate of release and the atmosphere's ability to transport and dilute the pollutant. The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, terrain and, for photochemical pollutants, sunshine. Northwest winds are most common in South San Francisco, reflecting the orientation of wind gaps within the mountains of the San Francisco Peninsula. Winds are persistent and strong, providing excellent ventilation and carrying pollutants downwind. Winds are lightest on the average in fall and winter. The persistent winds in South San Francisco result in a relatively low potential for air pollution. Even so, in fall and winter there are periods of several days when winds are very light and local pollutants can build up. Ambient air quality standards Both the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants which represent safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called "criteria" pollutants because the health and othereffects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The federal and California ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 1 for important pollutants. The federal and state ambient standards were developed independentl y with differing purposes and methods, although both federal and state standards are intended to avoid health-related effects. As a result, the federal and state standards differ in some cases. In general, the California state standards are more stringent. This is particularl y true for ozone and PMw The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) monitors air quality at numerous sites within the nine-county District, although not within South San City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 25 Francisco. The closest air monitoring stations are in San Francisco to the north and Redwood City to the south. In general, the federal ambient air quality standards are met at these sites, but the more stringent state standards are exceeded for two pollutants: ozone and particulate matter. Attainment status and regional air quality plans The federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act of 1988 require that the State Air Resources Board, based on air quality monitoring data, designate portions of the state where the federal or state ambient air quality standards are not met as "nonattainment areas." Because of the differences between the national and state standards, the designation of non attainment areas is different under the federal and state legislation. The Bay Area is currently a non attainment for I-hour ozone standard. However, in April 2004, U.S. EPA made a final finding that the Bay Area has attained the national 1- hour ozone standard. The finding of attainment does not mean the Bay Area has been reclassified as an attainment area for the I-hour standard. The region must submit a re- designation request to EP A in order to be reclassified as an attainment area. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified the San Francisco Bay Area as a nonattainment area for the federal 8-hour ozone standard. The Bay Area was designated as unclassifiable/ attainment for the federal PM2.5 standards. Under the California Clean Air Act San Mateo County is a nonattainment area for ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.S)' The county is either attainment or unclassified for other pollutants. The California Clean Air Act requires local air pollution control districts to prepare air quality attainment plans. These plans must provide for district- wide emission reductions of five percent per year averaged over consecutive three-year periods or if not, provide for adoption of "all feasible measures on an expeditious schedule." Table 1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Averaging Federal State Time Primary Standard Standard Ozone I-Hour -- 0.09 PPM 8-Hour 0.08 PPM 0.07 PPM Carbon Monoxide 8-Hour 9.0 PPM 9.0 PPM I-Hour 35.0 PPM 20.0 PPM Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Average 0.05 PPM -- I-Hour - 0.25 PPM Sulfur Dioxide Annual Average 0.03 PPM -- 24-Hour 0.14 PPM 0.04 PPM I-Hour -- 0.25 PPM PMlO Annual Average 50 -%,/m3 20 -%,/rnJ 24-Hour 150 ~/m3 50 g/m3 PM2.5 Annual 15 -%,/m3 12-%,/mJ 24-Hour 65 -%,/m3 -- City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 26 Lead Calendar Quarter 1.5 ~/m3 -- 3D Day Average -- 1.5 J!. / m3 Sulfates 24 Hour -- 25 ~ / m3 Hydrogen Sulfide I-Hour -- 0.03 PPM Vinyl Chloride 24-Hour -- 0.01 PPM PPM = Parts per Million --9/m3 = Micrograms per Cubic Meter Source: California Air Resources Board, Ambient Air Quality Standards (5/17/06) http://www.arb.ca.gov .aqs/aaqs2. pdf Toxic air contaminants In addition to the criteria pollutants discussed above, Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. There are many different types of T ACs, with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of TACs include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The most important, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulate, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to T ACs can result from emissions from normal operations, as well as accidental releases. Health effects of T ACs include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage and death. Project Impacts a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? NI. The San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin is currently non-attainment for ozone (state and federal ambient standards) and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10)(state ambient standard). While air quality plans exist for ozone, none exists for particulate matter. The Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy is the current ozone air quality plan. The plan contains mobile source controls, stationary source controls and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the state ozone standards within the Bay Area Air Basin. A project would be judged to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional air quality plan if it would be inconsistent with the growth assumptions, in terms of population, employment or regional growth in Vehicle Miles Traveled. The Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy utilized the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Projections 2003 forecasts of population and employment that are based on city / county general plans. The project would not conflict with the growth assumptions made in the preparation of the regional air quality plans nor would obstruct implementation of control measures contained in the regional air quality plans. The proposed sewer wet weather improvements would not directly or indirectly induce additional population or employment growth, so no impact would result. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 27 Project funding sources may include the State Revolving Loan Fund. Since this program is partially funded by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the project would be subject to the conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments. The conformity provisions of the Act are designed to ensure that federal agencies contribute to, instead of jeopardizing, efforts to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The General Conformity rules require conformity determinations for projects if they generate more emissions than minimum thresholds and are not specifically exempted by the regulation. The Bay Area is currently a federal non attainment area for ozone, and the General Conformity rules establish the following "de minimis" thresholds: 100 tons per year for VOCs 100 tons per year for NOx The operation of the project would not increase long-term emissions. However, during construction of the project additional emissions would be generated by construction equipment and vehicles. These emissions have been estimated for the entire construction period based on the types and numbers of equipment/ vehicles and the number of days they would be needed during construction. The emission factors utilized were taken from the construction module of the URBEMIS-2002 emissions program. Construction emissions shown in Table 2 are substantially below the "de minimis" thresholds for ozone precursors established for the region by the Federal Clean Air Act conformity rules. The proposed project would not interfere with attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and would not require a conformity determination. Table 2. Construction Emissions in Tons Per Year ROG NOx Project Construction 0.32 2.42 De Minimis Threshold 100 100 Source: Donald Ballanti, 2006 City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 28 Based on the above analysis, there would be no impact with regard to conflicts or obstruction of implementation of a clean air plan. b) Would the project violate any air quality standards? LS/M. Uncontrolled construction dust has the potential to locally cause exceedances of the state/ federal standards and/ or contribute significantly to an existing violation. This would be a potentially significant impact. The dust generating potential of the storm drain improvements is very limited. The project would not involve grading, earthmoving, clearing or burning, which are the construction activities with the highest potential for generating dust. The BAAQMD significance threshold for construction dust impacts is based on the appropriateness of construction dust controls. The BAAQMD guidelines provide feasible control measures for construction emission of PMw If the appropriate construction controls are to be implemented, then air pollutant emissions for construction activities would be considered less-than-significant. Mitigation Measure 1, below, is required so that the proposed project will meet BAAQMD standards: Mitigation Measure 1. The following dust reduction measures shall be inc~u~ed in construction plans and specifications to control fugitive dust emISSIOns: a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives; b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard; c) Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access road, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; d) Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.); e) Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph; f) Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways; The above measures include all feasible measures for construction emissions identified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. According the District threshold of significance for construction impacts, implementation of the measures would reduce construction impacts of the project to a less than significant level. c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? LS. The project would not result in any long-term, operational air quality impacts. See item "b," above regarding construction emissions. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 29 d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations? LS. The project would involve construction activity largely within roadway right-of- way adjacent to sensitive receptors. Construction activity would affect some residential areas, and construction would occur within streets adjacent to two schools (Spruce School and Buri-Buri School. The project would result in dust emissions and diesel exhaust emissions adjacent to sensitive receptors. In 1998 the California Air Resources Board identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant (T AC). CARB has completed a risk management process that identified potential cancer risks for a range of activities using diesel-fueled engines. High volume freeways, stationary diesel engines and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic (distribution centers, truck stops, etc.) were identified as having the highest associated risk. Health risks from Toxic Air Contaminants are function of both concentration and duration of exposure. Unlike the above types of sources, construction diesel impacts at any location would be short-lived. Construction would proceed at rates of 150 to 500 feet per day, so that construction emissions would affect a given location for no more than a few days. Due to the short duration of effect and the level of emission control required under "b," above, this impact would be less-than- significant. e) Would the project create objectionable odors? LS. During construction the various diesel-powered vehicles and equipment in use would create odors. These odors would be temporary and localized and would not affect neighboring properties for any extended time. The potential for diesel odors impacts would be less-than- significant. 4. Biological Resources Environmental Setting Project components are located within upland, urbanized areas of South San Francisco. Proposed work includes trenching and related activities within existing paved roadways or dedicated public utility easements. A biological resources reconnaissance of the project area was completed in June, 2006 by WRA Environmental Consultants, a San Rafael-based biological consulting firm. The results of the reconnaissance-level analyses are summarized below and are included as an appendix to this Initial Study. Special-status species Potential occurrence of special-status species in the project area was evaluated by first determining which special-status species might occur in the vicinity of the six subtrunk areas through a literature and database search. Database searches were conducted for known occurrences of special-status species included in the San Francisco South 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle and the eight surrounding USGS quadrangles. The following sources were reviewed to determine which special-status plant and wildlife species have been documented to occur in the vicinity of the project area. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 30 . California Natural Diversity database records (CNDDB 2006) . U.s. Fish & Wildlife Service Species Lists (USFWS 2006) . Calif. Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory records (CNPS 2006) . Calif. Deparbnent of Fish & Game (CDFG) publication "California Wildlife, Volumes I-III" (Zenier et, al. 1990) . CDFG publication" Amphibians and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California" Gennings and Hayes, 2004) A site visit was conducted by WRA staff biologists in June 2006 to search the project area for those species identified as potentially occurring in the project area and within the vicinity. The site visit does not constitute a protocol-level survey and was not intended to determine the actual presence of a special-status species; however, if a special-status was observed during the site visit, its presence was recorded. The site reconnaissance revealed that vegetation with the project area consists primarily of ornamental trees and herbaceous species planted along roads and in roads medians and turf lawns in front of dwellings and some businesses. In addition, a redwood grove and pine woodland are present in Orange Memorial Park through which the First Street sub trunk would pass. The only plant community within the project area that can be described is the ruderal grassland field between First and Second Streets and along the southwest edge of Orange Memorial Park. This field is dominated by non-native plants, including slender wild oats, ripgut brome, wild radish, Italian ryegrass and fennel. Fifty-one special-status species of wildlife have been recorded in the vicinity of the project area. Table A located in the biological analysis summarizes the potential for occurrence of these species in the project area. Of these, forty-five were determined not to be present because suitable habitat is not present or is limited in the project area, four species are unlikely to occur and two have a moderate potential for occurrence. The two special-status wildlife species with a moderate potential for occurrence in the project area are identified and discussed below. Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis). The Yuma myotis is found throughout most of California at lower elevation in a wide variety of habitats. Day roosts are found in buildings, trees, mines, caves, bridges and rock crevices. Night roosts are usually associated with buildings bridges or other man-made structures. The Yuma myotis may roost in buildings and under bridges near the project area. Although this species may potentially be found roosting near the project area, the type of construction will not disturb this species. Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). The Loggerhead Shrike is listed as a species of special concern by the CDFG and is a common resident and winter visitor in lowlands and foothills throughout California. It prefers open habitats with scattered trees, shrubs, posts, fences, utility lines and other perches. Nests are usually built on a stable branch in a densely foliaged shrub or small tree and are usually well concealed. Loggerhead Shrike foraging habitat may be found near the project area. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 31 Based on a review of the resources and databases, sixty-three special-status plant species have been documented in the general vicinity of the project area. These are shown in Table A, contained in the Appendix, which also includes an evaluation of the suitability of on-site habitats to support these species. Based on the evaluation contained in Table A, none of the special-status species are likely to be present in the project area. The habitat has been determined to be unsuitable due to a variety of factors, including lack of naturally occurring vegetation, lack of appropriate landforms and disturbed natural conditions. The site assessment occurred during the blooming period of forty-five of the special- status plant species identified in the records search and none of these plants were observed. Wetlands The site was surveyed to determine if any wetlands or and waters of the u.s. potentially subject to jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and/ or California Department of Fish and Game were present. The presence was based on the presence of wetland plant indicators, but may also include and observed indicators of wetland hydrology or wetland soils. No wetlands or other waters were observed on any of the sub trunk portions of the project. Colma Creek forms the southerly boundary of the Victory subtrunk. Regulatory framework Biological resources are protected by the following primary local, state and federal regulations: . Federal Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has jurisdiction over formally listed threatened and endangered terrestrial and freshwater species. The act protects listed animal species from harm or take. Plant species are also legally protected. . Clean Water Act: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is responsible under section 404 of the Clean Water Act to regulate discharge of fill material into waters of the United States, which include streams that are tributaries to navigable waters and their tributaries. . Rivers and Harbors Act: Certain structures and/ or work in or affecting navigable waters of the U.S. are regulated under the authority of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The creation of any obstruction to the navigable capacity without specific approval is prohibited. . Migratory Bird Treaty Act: This Act prohibits the taking, hunting, killing, selling, purchasing of migratory birds, eggs or nests. . California Endangered Species Act: The California Department of Fish and Game has jurisdiction over state listed threatened, rare (plants) and endangered plant and animal species. Also, species proposed for listing under the state act are City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 32 protected by its provisions. CDFG maintains a list pf species of special concerns, defined as species that appear vulnerable to extinction due to declining populations, limited ranges and continuing threats. . Section 401 Water Quality Certification: All Corps permits, including Nationwide Permits, require water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. This is administered by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Regional Board has adopted a policy requiring mitigation for loss of streambed, wetland or jurisdictional area. . McAteer-Petris Act: The Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) was established under this legislation to prevent unnecessary filling of San Francisco Bay and to increase public access to the bayfront shoreline. Project Impacts a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species? NI. Based on the site reconnaissance prepared by WRA, no special-status plants or animal species are expected to be found on or immediately adjacent to the project site, including candidate and sensitive species. No impacts are therefore anticipated to occur with regard to this impact. b, c) Have a substantial adverse impact on riparian habitat or federally protected wetlands? NI. Based on the site reconnaissance prepared by WRA, no wetlands or other waters of the Unities States or waters of the state exist on the project site. Although a portion of Colma Creek flows south of the Victory subtrunk portion of the project area, no project work is anticipated within or adjacent to the bank of Colma Creek No impacts are therefore anticipated. d) Interfere with movement of native fish or wildlife species? NI. The project involves temporary construction activities for replacement underground sewer pipes. Although temporary construction fencing may be erected along portions on the project area, these would be located in an urban area and would result in no impact with regard to interference with native fish or wildlife species. e, f) Conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or any adopted Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans? NI. The site is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. No impacts would therefore result. 5. Cultural Resources Environmental Setting Historical overview The development of South San Francisco began in the 19th Century when cattle ranchers from California's Central Valley purchased large expanses of open land as a place to hold and graze livestock before sending them to meatpacking houses in San Francisco's Hunters Point area. In 1890, several major meatpackers banded together to layout City of South San Francisco Page 33 Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather residential and industrial neighborhoods. Other industries were attracted to the area assisted by the extension of the Southern Pacific mail rail line through the town. Although sustaining some damage during the 1906 earthquake, the solid bedrock under Point San Bruno protected many structures. The City incorporated in 1908. By the 1920's many of the meatpackers had moved out of the community and were replaced by steel manufacturers, including Bethlehem Steel and U. S. Steel. During WWII, several major defense industries located in South San Francisco, especially ship building. After the war, the growth and expansion of San Francisco International Airport increased the demand for industrial properties. In the 1970's and 1980's, development of the large Cabot, Cabot & Forbes business park in the east of 101 area provided a home to large office users. Most recently, major biotechnology users have developed major research and development campuses in the community. Archaeological overview The geomorphological setting of the project area is pertinent as the matrix in which archaeological resources would occur. Most of South San Francisco is within the Colma Creek watershed, which has been the subject of extensive geomorphological study. However, the area east of Highway 101 are largely former areas of San Francisco Bay and its margins historically filled for development, areas highly sensitive for prehistoric archaeological deposits and which also contain historic features and resources under the fill. The Colma Creek corridor has been subject to extensive alluvial filling during the Holocene, burying the formerly steeper valley under several meters of alluvial deposits, primarily Colma Formation sand. The watercourse of Colma Creek meandered over time but remained basically along the geomorphic dividing line between the Franciscan Complex Cretaceous and Jurassic rocks of San Bruno Mountain to the east and the Pleistocene Colma Formation to the north and west. Exposures of Franciscan bedrock on the slopes of San Bruno Mountain include dark grey to yellow brown interbedded sandstones and shales (Bonilla 1998). The Colma Formation is mostly /Ifine-to-medium sand deposited in near-shore marine and continental settings. The deposit contains few interbeds of sandy silt, clay to sandy clay and graveL.. The age is estimated between 500,000 to one million years" (Witter 2001:3). Though both sides of the drainage contribute to sediment load and bank development along the creek, the highly erosive Colma Formation supplies much more bulk; in turn, those sand deposits are easily cut and transported by water flow. Natural filling was accentuated and added to by a program of historic filling in the mid to late nineteenth century, involving purposely altering the watercourse to bring sand to specific areas. This filling extended to near the Bay margin and deposited considerable depths of recent fill. A prehistoric shell midden site on the former banks of Colma Creek, at Chestnut Avenue and Mission Road, was discovered under a minimum 150 em (approximately 5 feet) of recent fill, and more than 600 em below surface in some locations; the majority of the fill which is interpreted as quite recent and likely to have resulted from both natural and purposeful filling. This location is on the west side of Highway 101 and older fill extending out into twentieth century fill around Point San Bruno. It is likely City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 34 that Holocene fill, both natural and artificial, is deeper at the more easterly extent of the project area locations subject to direct filling by Colma Creek. With the exception of the Project elements nearest the highest, erosion-resistant knobs of serpentinite and sheared Franciscan Formation rocks on Point San Bruno, all other portions of the project area are in mapped artificial fill upto 30 m deep. This artificial geomorphic setting makes research into the filling progression and episodes along the Bay margin and around Point San Bruno essential in assessing project potential to encounter both prehistoric and historic archaeological resources. Another prehistoric site was found under more than 5 m (16 feet) of historic fill near the mouth of Colma Creek after research into local filling showed the area to have been deeply covered. Prehistoric/Ethnohistoric/ Archaeological Though it is likely the San Francisco Peninsula has been inhabited by humans for something approaching 10,000 years, data confirming such a long tenure is lacking in San Mateo and San Francisco counties. While Santa Clara and Santa Cruz counties have furnished carbon dates in that age range, the oldest published dates for the Peninsula appear to be about 5000 years for undoubted habitation sites. The oldest published date for San Mateo County remains that from a site near the outlet of Colma Creek to the Bay at SMA-40, at just over 5100 years before present. Nearly equally old are the oldest component of the University Village Site (SMA-77) at the southeast of the county, and the "BART Man" in San Francisco. Hints of possibly older occupation on the San Mateo coast have been published, but are unsupported by technical dating techniques. It is safe to say that the Peninsula, including the Colma Creek drainage, was probably occupied by Native Americans at least 5000 years ago, but by different people than would later own the area. Ethnohistorically, the Colma Creek drainage was occupied by the Urebure tribelet, an Ohlone group, the Native Americans who owned the San Francisco Bay region, Santa Cruz Mountains, East Bay Hills, and the Monterey Bay area at the 1769 Spanish invasion. Archaeological evidence indicates the ancestral Ohlones arrived in the San Francisco/Monterey Bay region-depending on location-somewhere around AD. 500, possibly from the lower Sacramento Valley /Delta, displacing an earlier population. Natural resources of their home areas provided for nearly all the needs of the aboriginal Ohlone populations. The prehistoric Ohlones were hunters and gatherers, who adapted to and managed their abundant local environment so well that some places were continuously occupied for literally thousands of years. Compared to modern standards, population density always remained relatively low, but the Ohlone area, especially around Monterey and San Francisco Bays, was one of the most densely lived in areas of prehistoric California. The basic unit of Ohlone society was the "tribelet," a small independent land-holding group of usually related families occupying a specific territory and speaking the same language or dialect. An incredible diversity of languages had evolved in Central California, evidence of centuries of in-place divergence of very small social groups. Early linguists encountered some groups of only 50-100 people speaking dialects sometimes but not generally unintelligible to their neighbors. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 35 Traditional trade patterns thousands of years old operated when the Spanish invaded, supplying the Ohlones with products from sources sometimes hundreds of kilometers distant and allowing export of products unique to their region. Obsidian was obtained from the North Coast Ranges and Sierran sources, in patterns that changed through time. By 1769, the Ohlones had been buying finished obsidian arrowheads of specific forms, manufactured by North Coast Range tribes, for hundreds of years. By the time of European incursion, a unique native settlement pattern was in place along the Peninsula, in which the same tribelet group would own a strip across the Peninsula from ocean to Bay, based on drainages. These watercourses formed natural travelways across the spine of the Peninsula. Like other watercourses from the southern Santa Clara Valley to the northern end of the Peninsula, Colma Creek has a series of archaeological sites along its banks, connected to prehistoric cultural sites along the margins of the Bay. The Colma Creek (known as "San Bruno Creek" by the Spanish) drainage was probably held by a single group, the Urebure, that extended from the slopes of San Bruno Mountain to about San Mateo Creek, and used the creek corridor to travel from village sites on the Bay, the Pacific, and in between. Around the beginning of the twentieth century, N.C. Nelson recorded more than 400 major shell midden sites around San Francisco Bay, some of which had already been leveled or destroyed (Nelson 1909). Nelson's 1909 "Map of San Francisco Bay Region Showing Distribution of Shell Heaps" shows sites #378 and #377/ 379? in the vicinity of the proposed project. Nelson shows #378 south of Oyster Point on the north shore of San Bruno Point, and #377 /379? on the south side of Point San Bruno. Nelson's rough and sometimes inaccurate mapping, plus historic changes in the Bay shore and local topography, filling, massive construction projects in and around South San Francisco such as steel and meat packing plants, the Southern Pacific Railroad, and the Bayshore Freeway, and Nelson's generalized location descriptions, make a positive identification of the possibly rediscovered site on the south shore of Point San Bruno or near the mouth of Colma Creek difficult. Prehistorically, the upper Project Area (near Hickey Boulevard) would have been an area of windswept sand dunes fringed by oak grassland alongside the more thickly- vegetated Colma Creek riparian corridor. The Bay shore was very marshy, marshes extended up to approximately the Orange Memorial Park region in modern South San Francisco, with extensive mudflats and wetlands that offered very abundant resources but made access to the Bay difficult, so ideal habitation locations were at spots where hard ground met the Bay, surrounded by the marshes. The open exposure, easy slope, availability of fresh water, and location along one of only two easy routes along the Peninsula made this location attractive to the Ohlone Indians long before the European invasion. Several villages were located in the territory of the Urebure tribelet when the Spanish arrived, including occupations along Colma (San Bruno) Creek and on the margin of the Bay. A major site is located at the foot of San Bruno Mountain, just north of Point San Bruno (SMA-40), two habitation middens are recorded on the creek between the northwest and east of the Project (SMA-299 and -355), and another on the ocean at the western end of the route up Colma Creek (SMA-72); all were probably in use by the Urebure when the Spanish arrived. SMA-72 and SMA-355 are Late Period sites) and City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 36 SMA-40 has a late component. Further, Brown (1973) reports that prior to 1835 the San Bruno Mountain south slope area was known asa location of "Indian huts," perhaps a resettling of an old village site after secularization of the missions and dispersal of many of the missionized Indians, but no village or place name is recorded. The Colma Creek corridor and mouth, and surrounding Bay margin were a focus of aboriginal settlement and use. While the creek occasionally runs dry, the area still afforded sources of freshwater year round. Historic accounts affirm the area of the upper creek was" characterized by small lakes and an abundance of springs" (Svanivik and Burgett 1995: 16), and the earliest maps show a lake and springs near Hickey Boulevard. Remnants of these lakes are still shown on EI Camino plans in 1925 and exist today. The creek drainage below, in South San Francisco, was extensively filled and any such lakes covered, along with prehistoric sites. Bay margin filling and historic development have also covered or destroyed prehistoric shell middens on the former marshland margin of the Bay, which once extended far up Colma Creek. Farther from the current, or historic shoreline, prehistoric sites are still possible; it has been hypothesized that sites along the Bay shore older than about 5000 years lie buried under sediment or under the Bay itself due to rising sea level. Archeological records search Archaeological research for the proposed project was initiated with a search of relevant records, maps, and archives maintained by the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at Sonoma State University. Due to the indeterminate scope of the Project when the records search was sent in, a very wide area was addressed in the record search, essentially the entire Colma Creek drainage, and all of South San Francisco east of Junipero Serra Boulevard. The records search was conducted by the Center staff, revealing that numerous small areas of the Project Area had been surveyed for cultural resources previously, only a few of which proved finally to be directly applicable to the Project as now understood. Few cultural resources or historic properties are recorded within 500 m of the proposed project elements, none east of Highway 101. The CHRIS Records Search File Number for the Project Area is 00-560. A copy of this report will be submitted for inclusion in the permanent archives of the CHRIS. The records search revealed only three prehistoric archaeological sites in the vicinity of the proposed project, the aforementioned SMA-40, SMA-299, and SMA-355. SMA-40 is a large shell midden mound on the southeast slope of San Bruno Mountain west of Highway 101, a major cultural resource. SMA-299 is a diffuse shell midden once found on both banks of Colma Creek, now mostly destroyed. SMA-355 is a buried Late Period shell midden on the north bank of Colma Creek at Chestnut A venue. Both these last two sites may be near the nearest project work. Project Impacts a) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic resources? NI. The proposed project would include work only within public rights-of-way, primarily public roads. No impacts are therefore anticipated with regard to significant historical resources. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 37 b) Cause a substantial adverse impact or destruction to archeological resource? LS / M. As noted in the Environmental Setting section above, the various broad categories of project components have differing potential to effect archaeological resources. Project components that would not involve excavations nor significant surface disturbances, even in areas with demonstrated archaeological sensitivity, would not potentially affect historic properties. Work with excavations that would not penetrate undisturbed subsurface strata, or that would not penetrate recent fills into older fills, or that would only penetrate into strata known to have been cut into sterile soil, similarly do not have potential to affect historic properties. Project components requiring excavations that would or could penetrate into native or undisturbed strata, or into historic land surfaces that might contain historic archaeological deposits, or into historic fill that could contain potentially significant historic materials, would have the potential to affect historic properties. This would result in a potentially significant impact. Finally, project excavations that would only re-disturb strata known to have been previously, recently, disturbed, cannot be seen as having potential to affect historic properties. Though this process is necessarily complex for a project involving several separate components, detailed examination of the Environmental Setting and potential impacts will illustrate that many proposed elements would not have potential to affect historic properties. By the process of eliminating from consideration those Project Components that do not have potential to effect historic properties, the number of elements of concern in the Section 106 context is substantially reduced. As described in the Environmental Setting above, every element of the project is in a location with archaeological sensitivity, either for prehistoric or historic resources, or both. Basically, all elements are in the Colma Creek drainage or along the historic margins of the Bay and marshlands, clearly in areas of high sensitivity for prehistoric archaeological deposits. Even components in what were in the 1850s open Bay waters are in an archaeologically sensitive zone due to rising Bay waters over the last several thousand years. There is therefore a potential to encounter archaeological resources potentially meeting NRHP criteria. Based on the preliminary information above, detailed construction information on each project component is not always available due to the phased nature of this project. Therefore, the following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce potentially significant archeological impacts to a less-than-significant level: Mitigation Measure 2. An Archeological Resources Program shall be prepared by a qualified archeologist prior to start of any construction that shall include: a) Provision for submittal of Section 106-level analyses for each project component as they are designed and submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board for State Revolving Loan funding. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 38 b) Language added on individual project improvement plans and specifications to the effect that if archeological materials or artifacts are identified, work on that portion of the project shall cease until a resource protection plan conforming to CEQA Section 15064.5 is prepared by a qualified archeologist and / or paleontologist and approved by the South San Francisco City Engineer or an authorized representative. Project work may be resumed in compliance with such plan. If human remains are encountered, the County Coroner shall be contacted immediately and the provisions of State law carried out. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geological feature? LS/M. Any potential impacts to palenotological impacts will be addressed as part of Mitigation Measure 2. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? NI. No formal cemeteries have been identified in either the archeological or architectural historical resources survey, so no impacts would result. 6. Geology and Soils Environmental Setting Geology and soils The 1999 General Plan Existing Conditions Report identifies three general geological zones within South San Francisco. The Lowland Zone is primarily located east of the 101 Freeway and consists of gently sloping areas with areas of man-made fill over Bay mud. Slope is generally less than three percent. The Upland Zone is located in the middle portion of the community with topographic elevations ranging from 30 to 200 feet above sea level. This zone also includes the alluvial plain of Colma Creek. The Hillside Zone consists of the westerly portion of the community and is characterized by steeply sloping hillsides. The entire lowland zone consists of artificial fill underlain by Bay mud. Bay mud in this area consists of younger mud of the Holocene age, which is organic rich clay with silty clay with occasional beds of peat. Development hazards associated with this formation include shrink-swell potential, differential settlement, corrositivity and earthquake wave amplification. The Upland Zone consists of Colma Formation soils with the following characteristics: loose, friable, well-sorted sand with subordinate gravel, silt and clay deposits. It generally provides for good foundations and provides for earthquake stability when not disturbed by artificial cuts. The Merced Formation is comprised of poorly consolidated to semi-consolidated sand and silt deposits. It is subject to landslide hazard in areas of artificial cuts and generally provides for good seismic stability. The Colma Creek substrate is made of fine-grained alluvial deposits with unconsolidated, moderately sorted fine sand, silt and clayey silty debris deposited by Colma Creek during historic periods. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 39 Seismic hazards In terms of seismic hazards, the City of South San Francisco, and the Bay area as a whole, is located in one of the most seismically active regions in the United States. Several major faults and fault zones traverse the region, including the San Andreas, approximately 3.5 to 5 kilometers (km) from the site, the San Gregorio fault, the Hayward fault, the Calaveras fault, the Coyote Point fault and the Hunters Point fault. The closest fault zone to the project area is the Coyote Point fault zone, which lies north of the project area. The zone consists of a complex two-mile wide zone of faulting with three prominent strands in the vicinity of the project area. Because the California Department of Mines and Geology has not evaluated the Coyote Point and Hunters Point fault zones, neither has been included within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. The 1990 Working Group on the California earthquake Probabilities estimated a 67% probability of a major earthquake (7.0+ magnitude) by the year 2020. There are no know active faults within the project area. Project Impacts a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse impacts, including loss, injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, or landslides? NI. There would be no direct or indirect impacts to people or structures due to a seismic event with the proposed project, since no habitable structures would be constructed. Construction would be limited to underground facilities, including new and replacement sewer pipes. No impacts to humans or structures are therefore anticipated. b) Is the site subject to substantial erosion and/or the loss of topsoil? LS / M. Portions of the project would include trenching for replacement of sewer lines. Although limited, a possibility exists that stockpiling of trench spoils could erode into nearby streets, Colma Creek, other drainage facilities and ultimately into San Francisco Bay. This would be a significant impact. The following mitigation measure is therefore recommended to reduce erosion impacts to a less-than- significant level. Mitigation Measure 3. Contract specifications for this project shall require the preparation and implementation of an erosion control plan for all portions of the project that would involve trenching, excavation or stockpiling of dirt. The plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and be consistent with applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board guidelines and standards. c,d) Is the site located on soil that is unstable or expansive or result in potential lateral spreading, liquefaction, landslide or collapse? LS. The General Plan Background Report indicates that much of the project area consists of artificial fill over Bay mud, which is susceptible to liquefaction and lateral spreading, especially during a seismic event. According to the project design engineer, the presence of potential liquefaction and other soil and geotechnical hazards has been taken City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 40 into account in the project plans, so less-than-significant impacts are anticipated with regard to liquefaction and lateral spreading. Since the project area, with the exception of the Hillside Sub trunk, is generally flat, no impacts are anticipated with regard to landslides. The Hillside Subtrunk is proposed to be located in area of the community near previous minor landslides. However, since the project would involve subsurface improvements engineered to withstand anticipated geological risks, the potential of landslide or earth collapse in the Hillside Subtrunk area is considered less-than-significant. e) Have soils incapable of supporting on-site septic tanks if sewers are not available? NI. The proposed project involves upgrades to the City's sewer system, so there would be no impacts with regard to septic systems. 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Setting The General Plan Existing Conditions Report (1999) identifies a number of major hazardous waste sources in South San Francisco within the east of 101 areas, including the Koll site (a closed landfill), the Gateway site (former steel fabrication site), the Bay West Cove site (former steel mill and shipyard) and the Wildberg Brothers site (metal smelting). The Report also identified 114 sites in South San Francisco on the Cortese list that contain leaking underground storage tanks. The City of South San Francisco commissioned a Phase I Environmental Site Analysis for the proposed Phase II Wet Weather project from Kleinfelder Associates. The draft report is included in Appendix 3 of this Initial Study. The Draft Phase I report identifies numerous sites in or near each of the sewer sub trunk locations that contain or contained potentially hazardous materials. A summary of chemicals of potential concern by each subtrunk include: . Hillside Subtrunk: Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), gasoline, diesel and motor oil (gdmo), volatile organic carbons (VOCs), hexavalent chromium (Hex Chrom), Title 22 metals (CAM 17), semivolatile organic carbons (SVOCs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). . Portola Subtrunk: TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chrom and CAM 17. . Victory Subtrunk: TPHgdmo, VOCs. Hex Chrom, CAM 17, SVOCs and PCBs. . Westborough Subtrunk: TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chrom and CAM 17. . Airport Subtrunk: TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chrom, CAM 17, SVOCs and PCBs. A Phase Ii Environmental Site Assessment is currently being completed for this project City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 41 Project Impacts a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? LS/M. Although there would be no impacts with regard to transport or use of hazardous materials, there could be potentially significant impacts related to, excavation of soil to accommodate new sewer pipelines that could uncover contaminated soils and/ or contaminated groundwater. Potentially contaminated material would need to be removed in order to complete that portion of the project. The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce the possibility of release of hazardous material into the abnosphere or disposal of hazardous material off of the project area to a less-than- significant level. Mitigation Measure 4. Prior to commencement of construction of each of the sub trunks, a Soil and Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be prepared to address potentially contaminated soil and/ or groundwater that may be encountered during construction activities. The SWMP shall be prepared by a state-certified environmental professional, and will include the following components: a) An identification of visual and odor indicators that may indicate the presence of contaminants. b) A soil sampling and analysis plan detailing protocols for collecting and analyzing appropriate soil samples during site development to determine if contaminated soil is present c) A management plan detailing what specific steps will be taken if contaminated soil or groundwater is found, including additional testing, for removing and/ or isolating contaminated material, disposal site(s) for contaminated material, and a list of parties to be identified of the presence of contaminated material. As appropriate, the management plan implementation steps shall be included on construction plans and specifications. d) Worker education and safety plans shall be included in the SWMP. e) Necessary permits and approvals shall be obtained from appropriate regulatory agencies. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? LS / M. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 4 will reduce the potential of release of hazardous materials into the atmosphere to a less then significant level. c) Emit hazardous materials or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? LS/M. Elementary at 501 Spruce Avenue and Buri-Buri Elementary School at 120 EI Campo. Release of hazardous materials near these schools could occur during the construction phase of the project and this would be a potentially significant impact. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 4 would reduce this impact to a less-than- significant level. No impacts are anticipated with regard to release of hazardous material to schools during project operation. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 42 d) Is the site listed as a hazardous materials site? LS / M. The Draft Phase I ESA lists a number of sites within and adjacent to each of the sub trunks that are included on the Cortese list. This would therefore be a potentially significant impact and would be reduced to a less-than-significant level by adherence to Mitigation Measure 4. e,f) Is the site located within an airport land use plan of a public airport or private airstrip? LS. The project area is located north of San Francisco International Airport and within a flight path of the airport. However, since no above-ground structures would be constructed, there would be no interference with flight operations or safety concerns. No impacts are therefore anticipated regarding airport safety issues. g) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan? NT. The proposed project would not involve any change to existing roads or development patterns. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated with regard to interference with emergency evacuation plans. h) Expose people and structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? NT. The project area lies in a substantially urbanized area with minimal risk of wildland fires. No impacts are therefore anticipated. 8. Hydrology and Water Quality Environmental Setting The main surface body of water within South San Francisco is Colma Creek, a perennial stream with a watershed of approximately 16 square miles. Colma Creek extends in a southeastern direction through the center of the community. The two primary tributaries of Colma Creek include Twelve Mile Creek and Spruce Creek. Both of these smaller creeks have been almost all channelized and/ or undergrounded. Colma Creek provides the main transport of stormwater runoff and other runoff from South San Francisco into the Bay. East of the 101 Freeway, Colma Creek is contained in concrete and rip-rap channels. San Francisco Bay, another major body of water, forms the easterly boundary of South San Francisco. Surface water quality All flows into Colma Creek originate as stormwater, irrigation runoff or are from similar sources. As an urban stream, Colma Creek is expected to have high levels of heavy metals as well as other pollutants typical of urban bodies of water. South San Francisco has joined the other cities and San Mateo County to create the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. The purpose of this program is to administer a Joint Municipal NPDES Permit for stormwater quality management. Each participant has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan to ensure that Best Management Practices are enforced to protect surface water quality, during both construction and operational stages of a project. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase" Wet Weather Page 43 Groundwater Low topographic elevations and the Colma Creek floodplain in the East of 101 area provide conditions conducive to high groundwater. In some instances, groundwater has been encountered a few feet below surface elevations. During the rainy season, water often stands above ground surface in drainage ditches for several months. Flooding and tsunami hazards Periodic flooding occurs along most of the right-of-way of Colma Creek in South San Francisco. Portions of the project located southwest of Colma Creek and along the northerly edges of the Water Quality Control Plant are presently subject to flooding during lOO-year flood events. This information is based on Figure 10-2 contained in the 1999 General Plan Existing Conditions Report. Project Impacts a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? NI. Approval of portions of the requested project would serve to meet the Regional Water Quality Control Board Cease-and-Desist Order by replacing older, failing or substandard sewer lines thereby reducing inflow and infiltration into the system. No impacts are anticipated with regard to exceeding water quality discharge requirements. b) Substantially deplete groundwater recharge areas or lowering of water table? NI. No impacts are anticipated with regard to depletion of groundwater resources, since none of the project components would require use of water resources. Similarly, no impacts are anticipated with regard to overcovering groundwater recharge areas since no new impervious surfaces would be created as part of project implementation. It is anticipated that trenching for a number of project elements may require dewatering to remove groundwater intruding into excavations. If dewatering is necessary, standard specifications included on project plans would be employed to safely dewater trenches. Necessary permits would be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board to ensure water quality standards are met. c) Substantially alter drainage patterns, including streambed courses such that substantial siltation or erosion would occur? NI. There would be no additions to the amount of impervious surface in the community, since portions of existing streets would be disturbed for pipe replacement, then repaved. No impacts would occur with regard to altering drainage patterns. d) Substantially alter drainage patterns or result in flooding, either on or off the project site? NI. No impacts or changes to drainage patterns are anticipated since no additions to existing amounts of impervious surfaces are proposed. e) Create stormwater runoff that would exceed the capacity of drainage systems or add substantial amounts of polluted runoffi NI. No increases in the quantity, direction or velocity of existing drainage patterns are proposed since no changes to existing City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 44 development patterns or in the amount of impervious surfaces are proposed. No impacts would therefore result with regard to drainage systems. f) Substantially degrade water quality? NI. The objectives of the proposed project are to improve surface water quality by replacing failing existing sewer lines. There would therefore be no impact with regard to degradation of water quality. g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as mapped by a Flood Insurance Rate Map? NI. The proposed project does not include a housing component, so there would be no impact with regarding to placement of housing within a 100-year flood plain. h, i) Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard boundary structures that impeded or redirect flood flow, including dam failures? NI. Proposed construction would include replacement and minor upgrading of existing below ground sewer lines. No impacts are anticipated with regard to impedance of floodwaters or flows. j) Result in inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflows? NI. Based on Figure 10.2 contained in the General Plan Existing Conditions Report, none of the project components would be subject to seiche, since the subtrunks are located inland from San Francisco Bay. 9. Land Use and Planning Environmental Setting Existing land uses Land uses in the project area include a mix of industrial (portion of Airport Sub trunk, Victory A venue, the Hillside Sub trunk), commercial (portions of Airport Subtrunk, portions of the First Street Subtrunk and portions of Westborough Sub trunk) and residential (portions of Airport Subtrunk, portions of Westborough Subtrunk and portions of the First Street Subtrunk). A potion of the First Street Subtrunk also extends through a portion of Orange Memorial Park. As noted in the Project Description, all of the various subtrunk portions of the project are located in urbanized areas of South San Francisco. Regulatory framework Land uses within South San Francisco are regulated by the South San Francisco General Plan, which was recently updated in 1999. The General Plan includes the Land Use Element, Transportation Element, Parks, Public Facilities and Services Element, Economic Development Element, Open Space and Conservation Element, Health and Safety Element and Noise Element. Wastewater Guiding Policies adopted as part of the Parks, Public Facilities and Services General Plan Element include: City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 45 · 5.3.G-4: Promote the orderly and efficient operation and expansion of the wastewater treabnent system to meet projected needs. · 5.3.G-5: Promote equitable sharing of the costs associated with providing wastewater service to new development. · 5.3-G-6: Maintain environmental appropriate wastewater practices Wastewater Implementing Policies include: · 5.3-1-4: Ensure coordinated capital improvements with respect to the extent and timing of growth. · 5.3.1-5: Ensure that future residents and businesses equitably share costs associated with providing wastewater service to new development in South San Francisco. · 5.3-1-6: Monitor industrial discharges to ensure that wastewater quality continues to meet various federal, State and regional standards: treabnent costs should remain affordable · 5.4-1-7: Encourage new projects in East of 101 area at are likely to generate large quantities of wastewater to lower treabnent needs through recycling, pre- treabnent or other means as necessary. General Plan land use designations in the vicinity of the project area include a mix of Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Park, and Mixed Industrial. The City of South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance regulates land uses on private property in the community. Since project elements associated with this project are typically located within public rights-of-way or public properties, the Zoning Ordinance does not have authority for this project. Project Impacts a) Physically divide an established community? LS / M. Approval and construction of the proposed project would involve work within public rights-of-way, public easements or on properties currently owned by the City of South San Francisco, such as Orange Memorial Park. Short-term construction could result in a hardship for local businesses by restricting access during business hours. Accessibility to residential dwellings may also be temporarily disrupted during construction. This could be a potentially significant impact and the following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level: Mitigation Measure 5. The City shall undertake an advance notification program to property owners and residents that could be affected by the proposed construction program indicating, at a minimum, a description of proposed work, hours of operation, construction phasing and an individual to be notified in the event of emergencies. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation? NI. The proposed sewer improvement programs would be consistent with the Guiding and Implementing Policies of the Parks, Public Facilities and Services Element of the South San City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 46 Francisco General Plan as identified in the Environmental Setting section. No impacts would therefore result. c) Conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? NI. No such plan has been adopted within the City of South San Francisco. There would therefore be no impact to a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan for the proposed project. 10. Mineral Resources Environmental Setting The project area contains no known mineral resources. This is based on the Existing Conditions Report prepared as part of the 1999 General Plan Update process. Project Impacts a, b) Result in the loss of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources? NI. The City of South San Francisco General Plan (1999) does not indicate that significant deposits of minerals exist in the project area, so no impacts would occur. 11. Noise Environmental Setting The City defines "noise" as a sound or series of sounds that are intrusive, irritating, objectionable and/ or disruptive to daily life. Noise is primarily a concern with regard to noise sensitive land uses such as residences, schools, churches and hospitals. Although noise is controlled around commercial, industrial and recreation uses, community noise levels rarely exceed maximum recommended levels for these uses. The Noise Element of the General Plan EIR identifies the following primary sources on noise in South San Francisco: aircraft noise from San Francisco International Airport, traffic noise from freeways and arterial roadways in the community, railroad noise and industrial noise. The Noise Element identifies the following maximum noise exposure levels by land use type. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 47 Table 3. City of South San Francisco Noise Exposure Levels Land Use Noise Exposure Level Residential Less than 65: Satisfactorv 66 to 70: Conditionally Acceptable 70+: Unacceptable Commercial Less than 70:Satisfactory 70 to 80: Conditionally Acceptable 80+ Airport-related development only Industrial Up to 75: Satisfactory 75 to 85: Conditionally Acceptable 85+ Airport related development only Open Up to 75: Satisfactory 75+ A void uses involving concentrations of people or animals Source: South San Francisco General Plan Noise Element, 1999 Noise level references reflect Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) decibels Project Impacts a) Would the project expose persons or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established by the General Plan or other applicable standard: NI. All of the project components are proposed to be located underground so there would be no permanent noise generation and no impacts would therefore result. b) Exposure of people to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? LS / M. A portion of project components are proposed to be located within industrial and commercial areas, so there would be no impacts related to vibration during project construction. Construction of other portions of the project located in primarily residential areas could generate a temporary source of ground borne vibration as a result of trenching, pipe bursting, truck activity and other construction activities. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 6, below, would limit construction times of this project to normal construction times. With adherence to this mitigation measure, there would be less-than-significant impacts relative to vibration impacts. c) Substantial increases in permanent in ambient noise levels? NI. There would be no changes and no impacts with regard to potential permanent noise impacts since no noise-generating uses or operations are associated with the proposed project. d) Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? LS/M. Construction of the project could result in short-term noise and vibration due to trenching, generators, compressors and similar activities. There would also be increased noise levels from trucks and other construction vehicles needed for the project. In the short-term, these activities could exceed City noise exposure standards. For many of the sites and project components the potential for increased noise and vibration would be less-than- significant, since the surrounding areas have been developed for light industrial, City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 48 commercial or similar non-residential land uses. Construction activities within portions of the Westborough Sub trunk, portions of the First Street Sub trunk, portions of the Portola/Victory Subtrunk, the Hillside Sub trunk, and portions of the Airport Subtrunk of the project could result in potentially significant impacts to surrounding residential and park uses. The following measure is therefore recommended to reduce short-term construction noise to acceptable levels. Mitigation Measure 6. For portions of the project adjacent to residentially zoned portions of the project and within Orange Memorial Park, . construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday-Saturday. No construction shall occur on Sunday or on local, State or federal holidays. Exceptions may be granted on an emergency basis by the South San Francisco City Engineer. Construction activities shall be deemed to include vehicle warm-up and maintenance and delivery of construction materials. These limitations shall be included in all construction plans and specifications for the project. The above mitigation measure would also serve to limit any groundboume vibrations to a less-than-significant level. e, f) For a project located within an airport land use plan, would the project expose people to excessive noise levels? NI. The project does not include construction of buildings or facilities that would house people. No impacts are therefore anticipated in terms of this topic. 12. Population and Housing Environmental Setting Population South San Francisco is San Mateo County's fourth largest City. Population growth in the City has been cyclical over the last few years, generally fueled first by heavy industrial uses in the early and mid-part of the last century. More recently, biotechnology and related high tech and office uses have spurred residential growth. The one major project that is in the process of completion is the Terra Bay project on the south slopes of San Bruno Mountain. Other infill residential projects have been built along the El Camino corridor and other areas. Since the supply of large vacant parcels of land in the community is nearly exhausted, future residential growth is anticipated to be limited. Additional population growth must come from redevelopment projects. The following table includes historical population projections for the Bay Area, San Mateo County and South San Francisco, based on the Association of Bay Area Government's Projections 2005 publication. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 49 The City/s General Plan (1999) anticipates a maximum build-out population of 67,400 for the community. No time horizon for build-out is assumed for the General Plan. Table 4. Regional, County and City Population (1) 2000 Population 2010 Population 2020 Population Region 6/783/762 7,419/600 8/094/000 San Mateo 707/163 741/000 794,400 Co. South San 60/732 62/500 68/700 Francisco Source: (1) ABAG Projections 2005, includes City Sphere of Influence Employment Employment trends in South San Francisco have been changing from a heavy industrial center, dominated by steel mills, meat packing, ship building and similar "blue collar" industries to high tech and research jobs. Due to the proximity to regional transportation facilities and to San Francisco, continued employment growth is anticipated for the next 20+ years. The following table summarizes projected employment growth in South San Francisco. Table 5. Regional, County and City Employment (1) 2000 Jobs 2010 Jobs 2020 Jobs Region 3/753,460 3/836/540 4/463/630 San Mateo 386/590 368/390 433/860 Co. South San 45/190 45/120 51/210 Francisco Source: (1) ABAG Projections 2006, includes Sphere of Influence Project Impacts a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? NI. Approval of the proposed project would not increase population growth in South San Francisco, since the purposes of the project are to meet wastewater discharge requirements and to replace older, failing sewer facilities. No new and undeveloped areas of the community would receive sewer service that is not already receiving such service. The existing dry weather treabnent capacity of the City of South San Francisco Page 50 Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Water Quality Control Plant would not be expanded. No impacts are therefore anticipated with regard to population inducement. h,c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people? NI. The proposed project would not change existing land use patterns or uses. No impacts would therefore occur with regard to population displacement. 13. Public Services Environmental Setting The following provide essential services to the community: · Fire Protection. Fire protection services are handled by the City of South San Francisco Fire Deparbnent. The Deparbnent provides fire suppression, fire prevention, education, building inspection services and hazardous material control. · Police Protection: Police and security protection is provided by the City of South San Francisco Police Deparbnent, which maintains a 24-hour security patrol throughout the community. . Schools. The South San Francisco Unified School District provides K-12 educational services to the community. · Maintenance. Maintenance of streets, roads and other governmental facilities are the responsibility of the City of South San Francisco. · Solid Waste: Solid waste service is offered by South San Francisco Scavenger Company. After collection, waste is brought to the Line Transfer Station in the east of 101 area of the City and ultimately disposed of at the Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill located near Half Moon Bay. The Ox Mountain facility has a permit to accept fill material until 2016. Upon expiration of that permit, the facility is proposed for expansion. Project Impacts a) Fire protection? NI. Approval of the proposed project would have no impact to fire protection since the proposed facilities would be underground. b) Police protection? NI. Since all of the project elements would be closed to the public no impacts to police services are anticipated. c) Schools? NI. There would be no impact to school service should the proposed project he approved since no new residential development would occur, nor would the project indirectly induce new residential development. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 51 d) Other governmental service, including maintenance of public facilities? NI. There would be no impact to maintenance services provided by the City, since older, out-of-date facilities would be replaced by new facilities. e) Solid waste generation? NT. No impacts regarding generation of solid waste is anticipated since no new residential, commercial, industrial or similar land uses would be constructed. 14. Recreation Environmental Setting South San Francisco maintains 319.7 acres of parks and open space, equivalent to 5.4 acres per 1,000 residents. This includes 70 acres of developed parkland, 168.5 acres of open space and 81.2 acres of school lands. The City also provides a range of recreation programs available in 6 community recreation buildings, some of which provide specialized services. Project Impacts a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks? NI. Since the project does not propose the amount of habitable floor space in the community there would be no increase in the use of any parks in the community and no impacts would result. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction of recreational facilities? NI. Since no residential development is proposed as part of the project, no recreational services are required to be acquired or constructed and no impacts would result. 15. Transportation/Traffic Environmental Setting The community is served by a range of surface transportation facilities, including freeways (US 10.1 and 1-280), arterial roadways intended to serve through traffic (EI Camino Real, Sisters Cities Boulevard, Junipero Serra Boulevard and East Grand Avenue, collector roadways (Commercial, Del Monte Avenues) and local streets. The City also has made provision for a bicycle pathway through the community consisting of Class I, II and III facilities and public transit (SAMTrans). The Bay Area Rapid Transit System (BART) operates a station in South San Francisco along EI Camino Real. There is a Caltrain station near downtown South San Francisco. National and international air service is available at San Francisco International Airport, located immediately south of the community. Project Impacts City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 52 a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial to existing traffic load and street capacity? NI. The proposed project does not include facilities that would generate vehicular traffic. No impacts regarding traffic increase are therefore anticipated. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a LOS standard established by the County CMA for designated roads)? NI. Since no vehicular-generating development is proposed as part of the project there would be no impact to CMA routes. c) Change in air traffic patterns? NI. The proposed project would have no impact on air traffic patterns, since it involves an upgrade to the City's wastewater collection system. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use? LS / M. No permanent changes are proposed to the street system. However, temporary construction activities for trenching and excavating could partially block local streets during construction periods. This could result in a potentially significant impact due to disruption of local traffic patterns, especially during peak hour traffic periods. e) The following mitigation measure is therefore recommended to reduce this potential impact to a less-than-significant level: Mitigation Measure 7. A Traffic Construction Management Plan shall be prepared prior to commencement of construction, identifying specific methods to be undertaken to ensure that peak hour traffic can flow freely and that access to abutting properties is maintained for emergency vehicles. This shall include vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle modes of transportation. The Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the South San Francisco Engineering Division, Police and Fire Departments Result in inadequate emergency access? LS/M. Short-term access to properties may be restricted near project construction zones. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 7, above, would ensure that access would remain adequate to emergency service providers. f) Inadequate parking capacity? NI. No impacts to existing parking patterns are required since no development is proposed as part of the project. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? LS / M. Construction of the proposed project could restrict access for bicyclists and pedestrians near portions of the project area, especially where trenching and excavating is required to replace existing sewer pipes. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 7 would ensure that potential barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists would be reduced to a less-than- significant level. g) City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 53 16. Utilities and Service Systems Environmental Setting The project area is served by the following service providers: · Water supply: California Water Service. This private water company obtains water via an agreement with the San Francisco Water Deparbnent and from groundwater resources. In addition to South San Francisco, the water company serves customers in San Carlos and San Mateo. The Water Company prepares a range of water use projections based on fluctuations in population and employment demands. The company has indicated an adequate water supply for the highest projected demand for future uses. · Sewage collection and treabnent: City of South San Francisco. The City's sanitary sewer collection system has an interconnecting work of gravity sewers, force mains and pump stations which function together to bring wastewater from individual properties to the Water Quality Control Plant. Wastewater treabnent is accomplished at the City's Water Quality Control Plant, located at the easterly terminus of Belle Air road just south of Colma Creek. The Plant also provides service for the city of San Bruno, San Francisco International Airport and portions of other communities. The Plant has been recently upgraded and expanded to accommodated growing employment uses in the Plant's service area and to meet Regional Water Quality Control Board discharge requirements. . Storm drainage: City of South San Francisco maintains a series of drainage pipes and culverts through the City to accommodate stormwater runoff. East of the 280 freeway, storm water flows into Colma Creek for ultimate disposal in San Francisco Bay. . Electrical and natural gas power: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. provides electrical and natural gas service to the City of South San Francisco through a series of overhead and underground electrical lines. Existing pump stations receive electrical power from PG&E. . Communications: AT & T provides a range of telephone and telecommunication service to homes and businesses in the community. Project Impacts a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB? NI. The proposed project is being undertaken to meet such discharge requirements. No impacts are therefore anticipated. b) Require new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities? NI. The proposed project would not include any work on water or wastewater treabnent facilities so no impacts are anticipated. The project would involve upgrades to existing sewer lines. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 54 -~. c) Require new storm drainage facilities? NI. Existing drainage patterns would not be changed and no new drainage facilities would be needed. No impact would therefore result. d) Are sufficient water supplies available? NI. Based on information provided in the General Plan Existing Conditions Report, the water purveyor to the City has indicated that an ample water supply exists to serve future land uses. In this instance, the proposed project would not require any new source of water, so no impact to water service is anticipated. e) Adequate wastewater capacity to serve the proposed project? LS. See response to "a," above. e, f) Solid waste disposal? LS. Small quantities of solid waste would be generated by the implementation of the proposed project, which would be construction debris. This amount of solid waste is anticipated to be less-than-significant and can be accommodated in the local sanitary landfill. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? NI. The existing service provider will ensure adherence to federal, state and local solid waste regulations should the proposed reorganization be approved. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. g) 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No. The preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on overall environmental quality, including biological resources or cultural resources. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). No, the proposed project involves elements to upgrade the City's sewer facilities to assist in meeting wastewater discharge requirements. The project has been designed to replace existing facilities and to allow limited new growth consistent with the City's adopted General Plan, so there would be no cumulative impacts associated with project approval. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No. No such impacts have been discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study. City of South San Francisco Initial StudylPhase II Wet Weather Page 55 18. Alternatives to the Proposed Project This Initial Study includes two alternatives to the proposed project that is analyzed in the preceding sections: a "No Project" alternative and an alternative routing alternative. No Project alternative Under this alternative, the proposed Phase II wet weather sewer upgrade project would not be undertaken and none of the construction included in the Project description section would occur. If this alternative is chosen by the City of San Francisco, none of the impacts related to air quality, hazardous materials, erosion, short-term noise, construction traffic impacts or other impacts identified in the preceding analysis would occur. However, existing failing underground sewer facilities would not be replaced and the City would not respond to a portion of the Cease-and-Desist Order issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and potential groundwater pollution would continue to occur. Therefore, the no project alternative would not be environmentally sensitive to the proposed project. Alternative Routing Another alternative would include excavation of an open trench to stay within Westborough Boulevard from Camaritas Avenue to EI Camino Real, crossing EI Camino real and continuing in Chestnut Street to Mission Boulevard. A benefit of this alternative would be to avoid work within an easement behind commercial uses, including a bank and auto service station/ car wash. Since this alternative would require open trenching, impacts relating to air quality, noise and traffic may be somewhat greater than the proposed routing. The same impact to hazards and hazardous materials and cultural resources would result as under the proposed project. Therefore, this alternative would not be environmentally superior to the proposed project. City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 56 Initial Study Preparers Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, project manager Miley Holman, Holman Associates, archeology Matthew Clark, Holman Associates, archeology and cultural resources Donald Ballanti, air quality Tom Fraser, WRA, biology Jane Maxwell, report graphics Agencies and Organizations Consulted The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study: City of South San Francisco Terry White, P.E., Public Works Director Dennis Chuck, P .E., Senior Engineer Susy Kalkin, Acting Chief Planner CSG (City consultant engineer) Curt Luck, P.E., Project Engineer References Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration for the South San Francisco Sewer Improvement Project, Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, July 2002 South San Francisco General Plan: Existing Conditions and Planning Issues. Dyett & Bhatia, 1997 . South San Francisco General Plan, Dyett & Bhatia, 1999 South San Francisco General Plan EIR, EIP Associates, 1999 City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 57 Appendix 1 Air Quality Analysis (Donald Ballanti) City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 58 Donald BaUanti Certified Consulting Meteorologist 1424 Scott Street EI Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 234-6087 Fax: (510) 232-7752 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II PROJECT Prepared for: Jerry Haag 2029 University Avenue Berkeley, CA. 94704 June 2006 ) Air Pollution Meteorology - Dispersion Modeling -Climatological Analysis - Environmental Setting Air Pollution Climatoloav The amount of a given pollutant in the atmosphere is determined by the rate of release and the atmosphere's ability to transport and dilute the pollutant. The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, terrain and, for photochemical pollutants, sunshine. - Northwest winds are most common in South San Francisco, reflecting the orientation of wind gaps within the mountains of the San Francisco Peninsula. Winds are persistent and strong, providing excellent ventilation and carrying pollutants downwind. Winds are lightest on the average in fall and winter. The persistent winds in South San Francisco result in a relatively low potential for air pollution. Even so, in fall and winter there are periods of several days when winds are very light and local pollutants can build up. Ambient Air Quality Standards - Both the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants which represent safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called "criteria" pollutants because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. - The federal and California ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 1 for important pollutants. The federal and state ambient standards were developed independently with differing purposes and methods, although both federal and state standards are intended to avoid health-related effects. As a result, the federal and state standards differ in some cases. In general, the California state standards are more stringent. This is particularly true for ozone and PM1O. - - - The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) monitors air quality at numerous sites within the nine-county District, although not within South San Francisco. The closest air monitoring stations are in San Francisco to the north and Redwood City to the south. In general, the federal ambient air quality standards are met at these sites, but the more stringent state standards are exceeded for two pollutants: ozone and particulate matter. 2 - Table 1: Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Averaging Federal State Time Primary Standard Standard Ozone 1-Hour -- 0.09 PPM 8-Hour 0.08 PPM 0.07 PPM Carbon Monoxide 8-Hour 9.0 PPM 9.0 PPM 1-Hour 35.0 PPM 20.0 PPM Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Average 0.05 PPM -- 1-Hour - 0.25 PPM Sulfur Dioxide Annual Average 0.03 PPM -- 24-Hour 0.14 PPM 0.04 PPM 1-Hour - 0.25 PPM PM10 Annual Average 50 jJg/m~ 20 jJglm~ 24-Hour 150 l.Ig/m3 50 l.Ig/m3 PM2.5 Annual 15 jJglm3 12 jJg/m~ 24-Hour 65 jJg/m3 -- Lead Calendar Quarter 1.5 jJg/m3 - 30 Day Average - 1.5 l.Ia1m3 Sulfates 24 Hour - 25 IJg/m3 Hydrogen Sulfide 1-Hour - 0.03 PPM Vinyl Chloride 24-Hour - 0.01 PPM PPM = Parts per Million p.g/m3 = Micrograms per Cubic Meter Source: California Air Resources Board, Ambient Air Quality Standards (5/17/06) htto:/Iwww.arb.ca.Qov . aas/aaas2.odf 3 Attainment Status and Reaional Air Qualitv Plans The federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act of 1988 require that the State Air Resources Board, based on air quality monitoring data, designate portions of the state where the federal or state ambient air quality standards are not met as "nonattainment areas". Because of the differences between the national and state standards, the designation of nonattainment areas is different under the federal and state legislation. The Bay is currently a nonattainment for 1-hour ozone standard. However, in April 2004, U.S. EPA made a final finding that the Bay Area has attained the national1-hour ozone standard. The finding of attainment does not mean the Bay Area has been reclassified as an attainment area for the 1-hour standard. The region must submit a re-designation request to EPA in order to be reclassified as an attainment area. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified the San Francisco Bay Area as a nonattainment area for the federal 8-hour ozone standard. The Bay Area was designated as unclassifiable/attainment for the federal PM2.5 standards. Under the California Clean Air Act San Mateo County is a nonattainment area for ozone and particulate matter (PM1o and PM2.5). The county is either attainment or unclassified for other pollutants. The California Clean Air Act requires local air pollution control districts to prepare air quality attainment plans. These plans must provide for district-wide emission reductions of five percent per year averaged over consecutive three-year periods or if not, provide for adoption of flail feasible measures on an expeditious schedule". Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to the criteria pollutants discussed above, Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. There are many different types of T ACs, with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of T ACs include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The most important, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulate, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to T ACs can result from emissions from normal operations, as well as accidental releases. Health effects of T ACs include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage and death. 4 - - - - - - - PROJECT IMPACTS a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? (NI) The San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin is currently non-attainment for ozone (state and federal ambient standards) and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10)(state ambient standard). While air quality plans exist for ozone, none exists for particulate matter. The Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy1 is the current ozone air quality plan. The plan contains mobile source controls, stationary source controls and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the state ozone standards within the Bay Area Air Basin. A project would be judged to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional air quality plan if it would be inconsistent with the growth assumptions, in terms of population, employment or regional growth in Vehicle Miles Traveled. The Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy utilized the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Projections 2003 forecasts of population and employment which are based on city/county general plans. The project would not conflict with the growth assumptions made in the preparation of the regional air quality plans nor would obstruct implementation of control measures contained in the regional air quality plans. The proposed sewer improvements would not directly or indirectly induce additional population or employment growth, so no impact would result. Project funding sources may include the State Revolving Loan Fund. Since this program is partially funded by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the project would be subject to the conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments. The conformity provisions of the Act are designed to ensure that federal agencies contribute to, instead of jeopardizing, efforts to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The General Conformity rules require conformity determinations for projects if they generate more emissions than minimum thresholds and are not specifically exempted by the regulation. The Bay Area is currently a federal nonattainment area for ozone, and the General Conformity rules establish the following "de minimis" thresholds: 100 tons per year for VOCs 100 tons per year for NOx The operation of the project would not increase emIssIons. However, during construction of the project additional emissions would be generated by construction 1 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Bav Area 2005 Ozone Strateav, January 4, 5 - equipment and vehicles. These emiSSions have been estimated for the entire construction periOd based on the types and numbers of equipment/vehicles and the number of days they would be needed during construction. The emission factors utilized were taken from the construction module of the URBEMIS-2002 emissions program. 2 - Construction emissions shown in Table 2 are substantially below the "de minimis" thresholds for ozone precursors established for the region by the Federal Clean Air Act conformity rules. The proposed project would not interfere with attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and would not require a conformity determination. - b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (LS/M) - Uncontrolled construction dust has the potential to locally cause exceedances of the state/federal standards and/or contribute significantly to an existing violation. The dust generating potential of the storm drain improvements is very limited. The project would not involve grading, earthmoving, clearing or burning, which are the construction activities with the highest potential for generating dust. - The BAAQMD significance threshold for construction dust impacts is based on the appropriateness of construction dust controls. The BAAQMD guidelines provide feasible control measures for construction emission of PM10. If the appropriate construction controls are to be implemented, then air pollutant emissions for construction activities would be considered less-than-significant. Mitigation Measure: The following measures should be included in construction contracts to control fugitive dust emissions: · Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives; · Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard; · Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access road, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. 2 Jones and Stokes Associates, Software User's Guide: URBEMIS2002 for Windows with Enhanced Construction Module, Version 8.7, April 2005. 6 - . Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites; water sweepers shall vacuum up excess water to avoid runoff-related impacts to water quality; Table 2: Construction Emissions in Tons Per Year ROG NOx Project Construction 0.32 2.42 De Minimis Threshold 100 100 7 - · Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites; water sweepers shall vacuum up excess water to avoid runoff-related impacts to water quality; · Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.); · Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph; · Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways; · Watering or covering of stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind. The above measures include all feasible measures for construction emissions identified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. According the District threshold of significance for construction impacts, implementation of the measures would reduce construction impacts of the project to a less than significant level. - c) Result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? (LS) The project would not result in any long-term, operational air quality impacts. See item (b) above regarding construction emissions. d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (LS/M) The project would involve construction activity largely within roadway right-of-way adjacent to sensitive receptors. Construction activity would affect some residential areas, and construction would occur within streets adjacent to two schools (Spruce School and Buri-Buri School. The project would result in dust emissions and diesel exhaust emissions adjacent to sensitive receptors. - - In 1998 the California Air Resources Board identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant (T AC). CARB has completed a risk management process that identified potential cancer risks for a range of activities using diesel-fueled engines.3 High volume freeways, stationary diesel engines and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic (distribution centers, truckstop) were identified as having the highest associated risk. Health risks from Toxic Air Contaminants are function of both concentration and duration of exposure. Unlike the above types of sources, construction diesel impacts at 3 California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Enaines and Vehicles, October 2000. 8 any location would be short-lived. Construction would proceed at rates of 150 to 500 feet per day, so that construction emissions would affect a given location for no more than a few days. Due to the short duration of effect and the level of emission control required under (b) above, this impact would be less-than-significant. e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (LS) During construction the various diesel-powered vehicles and equipment in use would create odors. These odors are temporary and localized, and would not affect neighboring properties for any extended time. The potential for diesel odors impacts is less-than-significant. 9 - Appendix: Emissions Calculation Spreadsheet Printout 10 Spreadsheet to Calculate Emissions from Construction Activities Equipment Emissions (pounds) ROG NOx PM10 24.72 79.31 21.56 21.56 30.00 27.00 536.63 1713.92 465.92 465.92 653.25 822.00 66.95 214.24 58.24 58.24 81.00 140.25 1 1 1 1 1 1 Duration Number 103 103 28 28 75 75 8 8 8 8 8 8 Daily Usage Emission Factors (pounds/day) ROG NOx PM10 0.24 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.4 0.36 5.21 16.64 16.64 16.64 8.71 10.96 0.65 2.08 2.08 2.08 1.08 1.87 Equipment Type Backhoe Air Compressor Winch Trailer Generator Concrete Saw Excavator 204.15 pounds 4657.64 618.92 2.32882 0.102075 tons Emissions (pounds) ROG NOx 0.30946 Number Duration Daily Usage Emission Factors (grams/mile) ROG NOx PM10 Vehicles 1.03 6.10 9.70 PM10 10.40 52.43 114.54 3.48 4.58 10.01 2 1 3 103 103 75 20 20 20 0.022 0.261 0.261 1.146 11.556 11.556 0.383 1.01 1.01 Vehicle Type Pick Ups Flat Bed Truck Dump Truck 16.83 pounds 177.38 8.07 0.009035 0.088688 0.008414 tons tons/year 0.11 2.42 0.32 Grand total - Appendix 2 Biological Reconnaissance (WRA) City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 59 Biological Assessment Report SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WWP PHASE II SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Ray Razavi, City Engineer City of South San Francisco PO Box 711; 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco. CA 94083 Date: June 2006 Contact: Tom Fraser fraser@wra-ca.com (e)wra ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 2169-G Eaa1 Franclsc:o Blvd., San Rafael. CA 94'01 (415) 454-8868 tel (415) 454-0129 tax Info@WICI.ca.com WWW.wra-ca.ClOm - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 1.1 General Study Area Description ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 1.2 Regulatory Background ........................................... 1 1.2.1 Special Status Species ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 1.2.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Aquatic Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 2.0 METHODS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 2.1 Plant Communities ............................................... 4 2.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Aquatic Features. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2.1 Wetlands and Waters ....................................... 5 2.3 Special Status Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 2.3.1 Literature Review .......................................... 5 2.3.2 Site Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 3.1 Plant Communities ............................................... 6 3.2 Sensitive Habitats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 3.3 Special Status Species. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 3.3.1 Wildlife................................................... 6 3.3.2 Plants ................................................... 7 4.0 CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 5.0 REFERENCES......................................................... 8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Map of Study Area ............................................ 2 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B List of potentially occurring special status plant and wildlife species Study Area photographs 1.0 INTRODUCTION On June 1, 2006 a biological assessment was conducted at six sewage pipe construction locations in South San Francisco (Study Areas) by biologists from WRA, Inc. A biological assessment provides general information on the potential presence of sensitive species or habitats. The biological assessment is not an official protocol level survey for listed species that may be required for project approval by local, state, or federal agencies. However, specific findings on the occurrence of any species or the presence of sensitive habitats may require that protocol surveys be conducted. This assessment is based on information available at the time of the study and on site conditions that were observed on the date of the site visit. 1.1 General Study Area Description The Study Area consists of six locations in the San Francisco South USGS quadrangle (Figure 1). The six Study Area locations are along residential and commercial neighborhood streets throughout South San Francisco and are designated as 1) Airport Boulevard relief trunk, which runs from Sister Cities Boulevard to North Canal Street and South Linden Avenue; 2) Hillside Boulevard subtrunk, which runs from Linden Avenue to Arden Avenue; 3) Portola Avenue subtrunk, which runs from EI Camino Real, across EI Cortez Avenue and Ramona Avenue through Portola Avenue and Francisco Drive to the intersection of Francisco Drive and Sonora Avenue; 4) Victory Avenue subtrunk, which runs between South Spruce Avenue and South Linden Avenue; 5) Westborough Boulevard subtrunk, which runs along Del Monte Avenue from Nyla Avenue to Arroyo Drive and along Camaritas Avenue from Arroyo Drive to Westborough Boulevard and along Westborough Boulevard and Chestnut Avenue from Camaritas Avenue to Mission Rd; and 6) 151 Street subtrunk, which runs along EI Camino Real northeasterly under BART to the connection with Mission Road trunk sewer in Orange Memorial Park. 1.2 Regulatory Background 1.2.1 Special Status Species Special status species include those plants and wildlife species that have been formally listed, are proposed as endangered or threatened, or are candidates for such listing under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) or California Endangered Species Act (CESA). These Acts afford protection to both listed and proposed species. In addition, the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Species of Special Concern, which are species that face extirpation in California if current population and habitat trends continue, are considered special status species. Although California Species of Concern generally have no special legal status, they are given special consideration under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition to regulations for special status species, most birds in the United States, including non- status species, are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. Under this legislation, destroying active nests, eggs, and young is illegal. Plant species on California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Lists 1 and 2 are also considered special status plant species. Impacts to these species are considered significant according to CEQA. The CNPS List 3 and 4 plants have little or no protection under CEQA, but are included in this analysis for completeness. The assessment may also include species of local concern as designated by a city or county. - - 1.2.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Aquatic Features Sensitive habitats include habitats that fulfill special functions or have special values, such as wetlands, streams, and riparian habitat. These habitats are regulated under federal regulations (such as the Clean Water Act), state regulations (such as the Porter-Cologne Act, CDFG's Streambed Alteration Program, or CEQA), or local ordinances or policies (such as City or County Tree Ordinances, Special Habitat Management Areas or General Plan Special Land Use areas). - Waters of the United States The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates "Waters of the United States" under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. "Waters of the U.S: are defined broadly as waters susceptible to use in commerce, including interstate waters and wetlands, all other waters (intrastate waterbodies, including wetlands), and their tributaries (33 CFR 328.3). Potential wetland areas, according to the three criteria used to delineate wetlands stated in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987), are identified by the presence of (1) hydrophytic vegetation, (2) hydric soils, and (3) wetland hydrology. Areas that are inundated for sufficient duration and depth to exclude growth of hydrophytic vegetation are subject to Section 404 jurisdiction as "other waters" and are often characterized by an ordinary high water line (OHW). Other waters, for example, generally include lakes, rivers, and streams. The placement of fill materials into "Waters of the U.S," (including wetlands) generally requires an individual or nationwide permit from the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Waters of the State "Waters of the State" are defined by the Porter-Cologne Act as "any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state." The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) protects all waters in its regulatory scope, but has special responsibility for wetlands, riparian areas, and headwaters. These waterbodies have high resource value, are vulnerable to filling, and are not systematically protected by other programs. RWQCB jurisdiction includes "isolated" wetlands and waters that may not be regulated by the Corps under Section 404. "Waters of the State" are regulated by the RWQCB under the State Water Quality Certification Program which regulates diSCharges of fill and dredged material under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Projects that require a Corps permit, or fall under other federal jurisdiction, and have the potential to impact .Waters of the State," are required to comply with the terms of the Water Quality Certification determination. If a proposed project does not require a federal permit, but does involve dredge or fill activities that may result in a discharge to "Waters of the State," the RWQCB has the option to regulate the dredge and fill activities under its state authority in the form of Waste Discharge Requirements or Certification of Waste Discharge Requirements. Streams. Lakes. and RiDarian Habitat Streams and lakes, as habitat for fish and wildlife species, are subject to jurisdiction by CDFG under Sections 1600-1616 of the State Fish and Game Code. Alterations to or work within or adjacent to streambeds or lakes generally require a 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement. The term stream, which includes creeks and rivers, is defined in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) as follows: "a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life. This includes watercourses having a surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported 3 riparian vegetation" (14 CCR 1.72). In addition, the term stream can include ephemeral streams, dry washes, watercourses with subsurface flows, canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other means of water conveyance if they support aquatic life, riparian vegetation, or stream dependent terrestrial wildlife (CDFG ESD 1994). Riparian is defined as "on, or pertaining to, the banks of a stream". Therefore, riparian vegetation is defined as "vegetation which occurs in and/or adjacent to a stream and is dependent on, and occurs because of, the stream itself' (CDFG ESO 1994). Removal of riparian vegetation also requires a Section 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFG. Sensitive Plant Communities Sensitive plant communities include habitats that fulfill special functions or have special values. Natural communities considered sensitive are those identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by CDFG. CDFG ranks sensitive communities as "threatened" or "very threatened" and keeps records of their occurrences in its Natural Diversity Database. Sensitive plant communities are also identified by CDFG on their List of California Natural Communities Recognized by the CNDDB. Impacts to sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the CDFG or USFWS must be considered and evaluated under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Code or Regulations: Title 14, Div. 6, Chap. 3, Appendix G). Examples of sensitive plant communities include wetland, riparian oak woodland, and serpentine communities. 2.0 METHODS On June 1, 2006, the Study Area was visited to determine (1) plant communities present within the Study Area, (2) if existing conditions provided suitable habitat for any special status plant or wildlife species, and (3) if sensitive habitats were present. Prior to the site visit, the Soil Survey of San Mateo County, Eastern Part, and San Francisco County, California (U.S. Department of Agriculture 1991) was examined to determine if any unique soil types that could support sensitive plant communities and/or aquatic features were present in the Study Area. A list of special status plants and animals that may occur in the area is listed in Appendix A. 2.1 Plant Communities Plant communities were classified based on the existing descriptions developed by The California Manual of Vegetation (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995). However, in some cases it is necessary to identify variants of plant community types or to describe non-vegetated areas that are not described in the literature. 2.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Aquatic Features Plant communities identified within the Study Area were evaluated to determine if they are considered sensitive under federal or state regulations or policies. Special methods used to determine potential jurisdiction under these regulations and policies are given below: 4 - - 2.2.1 Wetlands and Waters The Study Area was surveyed to determine if any wetlands and "waters" potentially subject to jurisdiction by the Corps, RWQCB, or CDFG were present. The assessment was based primarily on the presence of wetland plant indicators, but may also include any observed indicators of wetland hydrology or wetland soils. Any potential wetland areas are identified as areas dominated by plant species with a wetland indicator status1 of OBL, FACW, or FAC as given on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands (Reed 1988). Evidence of wetland hydrology can include direct evidence (primary indicators) such as visible inundation or saturation, surface sediment deposits, algal mats and drift lines, or indirect indicators (secondary indicators), such as oxidized root channels. Some indicators of wetland soils include dark colored soils, soils with a sulfidic odor, and soils that contain redoximorphic features as defined by the Corps Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (NRCS 2002). - 2.3 Special Status SpeCies - 2.3.1 Literature Review Potential occurrence of special status species in the Study Area was evaluated by first determining which special status species occur in the vicinities of the six locations through a literature and database search. Database searches for known occurrences of special status species included the San Francisco South 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle and the eight surrounding USGS quadrangles. The following sources Were reviewed to determine which special status plant and wildlife species have been documented to occur in the vicinities of the Study Area: · California Natural Diversity Database records (CNDDB) (CDFG 2006) · USFWS Quadrangle Species Lists (USFWS 2006) · CNPS Electronic Inventory records (CNPS 2006) · CDFG publication "California's Wildlife. Volumes I-I"" (Zeiner et at 1990) · CDFG pUblication "Amphibians and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California" (Jennings and Hayes 2004) - 2.3.2 Site Assessment A site visit was conducted to search for suitable habitats within the Study Area for those species identified as occurring within the vicinity. Potential for special status species to occur in the Study Area was then evaluated according to the following criteria: (1) Not Present. Habitat on and adjacent to the site is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (foraging, breeding, cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). (2) Unlikelv. Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of the habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found on the site. 1 OBL = Obligate, always found in wetlands (>99% frequency of occurrence); FACW = Facultative wetland, usually found in wetlands (67-99% frequency of occurrence); FAC = Facultative, equal occurrence in wetland or non-wetlands (34-66% frequency of occurrence). 5 - - (3) Moderate Potential. Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found on the site. (4) Hiah Potential. All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on the site. (5) Present. Species is observed on the site or has been recorded (Le., CNDDB, other reports) on the site recently. Appendix A presents the special status plant and wildlife species with a potential to occur within the Study Area, their habitat requirements, and a rating of potential for occurrence. A site visit is intended to identify suitable habitat for special status species known to occur in the vicinity in order to determine their potential to occur within the Study Area. The site visit does not constitute a protocol level survey and is not intended to determine the actual presence or absence of a species; however, if a special status species is observed during the site visit, its presence will be recorded and discussed. 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The following sections present the results and discussion of the biological assessment for special status species and sensitive habitats within the Study Area. 3.1 Plant Communities The vegetation within the Study Area consists mostly of ornamental trees and herbaceaous species planted along the roads and in road medians, and turf grass lawns in front of residences. In addition, a redwood and pine woodland is present in Orange Memorial Park through which the 1st Street subtrunk runs. The only plant community that can be described is the ruderal grassland field between 1 st and 2nd Streets, along the southwest edge of Orange Memorial Park in the 1st Street subtrunk location. This field is dominated by non-native plants including, slender wild oats (Avena barbata), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), wild radish (Raphanus sativus), Italian ryegrass (Lo/ium multiflorum), and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). 3.2 Sensitive Habitats No sensitive habitats were identified within the Study Area. 3.3 Special Status Species 3.3.1 Wi/dlife Fifty-two special status species of wildlife have been recorded in the vicinity of the Study Area. Appendix A summarizes the potential for occurrence for these species in the Study Area. Of these species, 46 wildlife species were determined not to be present because suitable habitat is 6 - - not present or is limited within the Study Area, four species are unlikely to occur in the Study Area, and two species have a moderate potential for occurrence. The two special status wildlife species with a moderate potential for occurrence in the Study Area are discussed further below. Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis), WBWG, High Priority. The Yuma myotis is found throughout most of California at lower elevations in a wide variety of habitats. Day roosts are found in buildings, trees, mines, caves, bridges, and rock crevices. Night roosts are usually associated with buildings, bridges, or other man made structures (Philpott 1996). The Yuma myotis may roost in buildings and under bridges near the Study Area. Although the Yuma myotis potentially can be found roosting near the Study Area, this project will not impact roost habitat within the Study Area. No mitigation measures will be necessary. - Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovic/anus), CDFG Species of Special Concern, BCC Bird of Conservation Concern. The Loggerhead Shrike is a common resident and winter visitor in lowlands and foothills throughout California. It prefers open habitats with scattered trees, shrubs, posts, fences, utility lines or other perches. Nests are usually built on a stable branch in a densely-foliaged shrub or small tree and are usually well-concealed. Loggerhead Shrike foraging habitat may be found near the Study Area, but no impact to nests will occur within the StUdy Area. No mitigation measures will be necessary. - 3.3.2 Plants Based upon a review of the resources and databases given in Section 2.3.1, 63 special status plant species have been documented in the general vicinity of the Study Area. Appendix A summarizes species habitat requirements and evaluates the suitability of on-site habitats to support these species. Based on this evaluation, none of the special status species are likely to ever be present in the Study Area. The habitat was determined to be unsuitable for a variety of factors, including lack of naturally occurring vegetation communities (e.g., coastal scrub, cismonate forest, marshes), lack of appropriate substrates or landforms (e.g., serpentine soils, rocky soils, coastal bluffs), and disturbed habitat conditions (e.g., planted ornamental vegetation) . The site assessment occurred during the blooming period of 45 of the special status plant species generated by the record search; however, none of these species were observed. - - 4.0 CONCLUSION No special status plant species and two special status wildlife species have a moderate potential to occur within the Study Area. However, these species will not be affected by the project. No sensitive habitats were found in the Study Area. Based on the results of the biological assessment, no special status species, their potential habitat, or sensitive plant communities within the Study Area will be impacted by the proposed sewage upgrade project. 7 - 5.0 REFERENCES California Department of Fish and Game. Environmental Services Division (ESD). 1994. A Field Guide to Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements, Sections 1600-1607, California Fish and Game Code. California Department of Fish and Game. 2006. Natural Diversity Database, Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch. Sacramento. California Native Plant Society. 2006. Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Department of the Army, Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 39180-0631. Hickman, J. C. (ed.) 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. Jennings, Mark R. 2004. An Annotated Check List of Amphibians and Reptile Species of California and Adjacent Waters. Third, revised edition. California Department of Fish and Game. Jennings, M. R. and M. P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Rancho Cordova, California. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2002. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, version 5.0. G.w. Hurt, P.M. Whited, eds. USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX. Sawyer, J.D. and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: California (Region 0). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.10). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1991. Soil Survey of San Mateo County, Eastern Part, and San Francisco County, California. 120 pp. + appendices. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Unofficial Species Lists, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Service. Sacramento. June 5. Zeiner, D. C., W.F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayers, and M. White. 1990. California's Wildlife, Volume I-III: Amphibians and Reptiles, Birds, Mammals. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. 8 - - APPENDIX A LIST OF POTENTIAL SPECIAL STATUS PLANT AND WILDLIFE SPECIES - ~ Appendix A. Special status plant and animal species that may occur, or are known to occur in the vicinity of the Study Area. List compiled for the San Francisco South USGS quad and the eight surrounding quads, using the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), Califomia Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) 2006, the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) electronic inventory 2006, and the United States Fish and INildlife USFWS) Official Soecies List 2006. Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Mammals salt-marsh wandering CSC Found in salt marshes of the South Arm of San Not Present. Suitable salt marsh habitat is shrew Francisco Bay. Prefer medium to high marsh 6-8ft not present in the Study Area. Sorex vagrans above sea level. halicoetes Townsend's western CSC Primarily found in rural settings in a wide variety of Not Present. Suitable foraging and roosting habitat is not present due to disturbed big-eared bat habitats including oak woodlands and mixed development in the Study Area. Corynominus townsendii coniferous-deciduous forest. Day roosts highly townsendii associated with caves and mines. Very sensitive to human disturbance. western small-footed WBWG Commonly found in arid uplands of California. Feeds Not Present. Suitable roosting and foraging myotis on a variety of small flying insects. Seeks cover in habitat is not present in the Study Area. Myotis ci/iofabrum caves, buildings, mines, crevices, and occasionally under bridges. long-eared myolis WBWG Primarily a forest associated species. Day roosts in Not Present. Suitable roosting and foraging habitat in a forested area is not present in Myotis evotis hollow trees, under exfOliating bark, rock outcrop the Study Area. crevices and buildings. Other roosts include caves, mines and under bridges. fringed myotis WBWG Associated with a wide variety of habitats including Unlikely. Existing disturbance in buildings Myotis thysanodes mixed coniferous-deciduous forest and in the urban area likely precludes presence redwood/sequoia groves. Buildings, mines and large in the Study Area. snags are important day and night roosts. Yuma myolis WBWG Known for its ability to survive in urbanized Moderate Potential. Suitable roosting and Myotis yumanensis environments. Also found in heavily forested settings. foraging habitat may be present in the Day roosts in buildings, trees, mines, caves, bridges vicinity of the project, particularly in older and rock crevices. Night roosts associated with man- buildings. Probably forages in the Study made structures. Area. A-1 Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence greater western mastiff CSC, WBWG Found in a wide variety of habitat. Distribution Not Present. Suitable roosting and bat appears to be tied to large rock structures, which foraging habitat in boulders and cliff Eumops perotis provide suitable roosting sites, including cliff crevices crevices is not present in the Study Area. ca/ifomicus and cracks in boulders. salt-marsh harvest FE,SE Primary habitat in pickleweed-dominated saline Not Present. Suitable pickleweed and mouse emergent marshes of San Francisco Bay. Require saline emergent marsh habitat is not Reithrodontomys adjacent upland areas for escape from high tides. present in the Study Area. raviventris San Francisco dusky- CSC Occurs in forest habitats of moderate canopy and Not Present. Suitable canopy and dense footed woodrat moderate to dense understory. Also found in understory habitat is not present in the Neotoma fuscipes chaparral habitats. Feeds mainly on woody plants: live Study Area. annectens oak, maple, coffeeberry, alder, and elderberry Birds Common Loon CSC INinter in estuarine and sub-tidal marine habitats along Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging habitat in sub-tidal marine areas are not Gavia immer coast, San Francisco Bay. Dresent in the Study Area. California Brown Pelican FE, SE Found in estuarine, marine sub-tidal, and marine Not Present. Suitable nesting habitat on Pe/ecanus occidenta/is pelagic waters along the coast. Nest on rocky or low undisturbed islands and foraging habitat in estuarine and marine sub-tidal areas are ca/ifomicus brushy slopes of undisturbed islands. not present in the Study Area. Double-Crested CSC Nests along coast on sequestered islets, usually on Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging habitat in tall trees along lake margins are Cormorant ground with sloping surface or in tall trees along lake not present in the Study Area. Pha/acrocorax aufitus margins. . Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging lNhite- Tailed Kite CFP Year-long resident of coastal and valley lowlands; habitat in agricultural areas are not present E/anus /eucurus rarely found away from agricultural areas. Preys on small diurnal mammals and occasional birds, insects, in the Study Area. reptiles, and amphibians. Bald Eagle FT,SE Requires large bodies of water, or free-flowing rivers Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging habitat in large bodies of water are not Haliaeetus with abundant fish adjacent snags or other perches. present in the Study Area. /eucocepha/us Nests in large, old-growth, or dominant live tree with open branchwork. A-2 - - - - - Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Northern Harrier CSC Found in open grasslands, prairies, and marshes. Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Circus cyaneus Tend to nest near water. habitat in open grassland, prairies, and marshes are not Dresent in the Studv Area. Cooper's Hawk CSC Inhabits areas with dense tree stands or patchy Unlikely. Poor nesting and foraging habitat Accipter cooperi woodlands. Usually nests in deciduous riparian areas present in the Study Area. or second-growth conifer stands near streams. Ferruginous Hawk CSC, BCC Frequents open grasslands, sagebrush flats, desert Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Buteo rega/is scrub, low foothills surrounding valleys and fringes of habitat in grasslands, sagebrush flats, and pinyon-juniper habitats. scrub are not present in the Study Area. American Peregrine SE, BCC INinters throughout Central Valley. Requires protected Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Falcon cliffs and ledges for cover. Feeds on a variety of birds, habitat in cliff side are not present in the Falco peregrinus and some mammals, insects, and fish. Study Area. anatum California Black Rail ST, BCC Rarely seen resident of saline, brackish, and fresh Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Latera/fus jamaicensis emergent wetlands in the San Francisco. Bay Area. habitat in emergent wetlands and coturnicu/us Nest in dense stands of pickleweed pickleweed stands are not present in the Studv Area. California Clapper Rail FE,SE Found in tidal salt marshes of San Francisco Bay. Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Ra/fus longirostris Require mudflats for foraging and dense vegetation on habitat in tidal salt marshes and dense obso/etus higher ground for nesting. vegetation are not present in the Study Area. Western Snowy Plover FT, CSC, BCC Federal listing applies only to the Pacific Coastal Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging (nesting) Population. Found on sandy beaches, salt pond levees habitat are not present in the Study Area. Charadrius a/exandrinus and shores of large alkali lakes. Need sandy gravelly nivosus or friable soils for nesting. Long-Billed Curlew CSC, BCC INinters in large coastal estuaries, upland herbaceous Not Present. Suitable foraging habitat in Numenius americanus areas, and croplands. Breeds in northeastern estuaries and cropland is not present in the California in wet meadow habitat. Study Area. Califomia Least Tern FE,SE Breeding colonies in San Francisco Bay found in Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging (nesting colony) abandoned salt ponds and along estuarine shores. habitat salt ponds and estuarine shores are Stema antif/arum browni Nests on barren to sparsely vegetated site near water. not present in the Study Area. A-3 - - Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Black Skimmer <nesting CSC, BCC Nests on gravel bars, low islets, and sandy beaches in Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging colony) unvegetated sites. habitat in gravel bars, low islets, and sandy Rynchops niger beaches are not present in the Study Area. Marbled Murrelet FT,SE Breed in old-growth redwood stands containing Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Brachyramphus platform-like branches along coastal areas. habitat in old-growth redwood stands are marmoratus not present in the StUdy Area. Westem Burrowing Owl CSC Frequents open grasslands and shrublands with Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Athene cunicu/aria perches and burrows. Preys upon insects, small habitat in open grasslands are not present hypugea mammals, reptiles, birds, and carrion. Nests and in the Study Area. roosts in old burrows of small mammals. Short-Eared Owl CSC Found in open, treeless areas with elevated sites for Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Asio ffammeus perches and dense vegetation for roosting and habitat in open treeless areas and dense nesting. vegetation are not present in the Study . Area. Vaux's Swift CSC Forages high in the air over most terrain and habitats Not Present. Suitable foraging habitat in Chaetura vauxi but prefer rivers/lakes. Requires large hollow trees for riversnakes and hollow trees for nesting is nesting. not present in the Study Area. Black Swift CSC,BCC Breeds in small colonies on cliffs behind or adjacent to Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Cypse/oides niger waterfalls in deep canyons and sea-bluffs above surf. habitat on cliffs and sea bluffs are not Forages widely. present in the Study Area. Olive-Sided Flycatcher BCC Most often found in montane conifer forests where tall Unlikely. Suitable nesting and foraging Contopus cooperi trees overlook canyons, meadows, lakes or other open habitat in tall trees and open terrain may be terrain present in the Study Area. Bank Swallow ST Migrant in riparian and other lowland habitats in Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Riparia riparia western California. Nests in riparian areas with vertical habitat in riparian areas with vertical cliffs cliffs and bands with fine-textured or sandy soils in are not present in the Study Area. which to nest. Loggerhead Shrike CSC,BCC Prefers open habitats with scattered shrubs, trees, and Moderate Potential. Suitable foraging Lanius /udovicianus utility lines from which to forage for large insects. Nest habitat in scattered! open areas are present well concealed above ground in densely-foliaged shrub in the Study Area. Not likely to nest in or or tree. near the Study Area. - A-4 - - Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Yellow Warbler esc Nests in riparian stands of willows, cottonwoods, Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Dendroica petechia aspens, sycamores, and alders. Also nests in habitat in riparian willows, cottonwood, brewsteri montane shrubbery in open conifer forests. aspen, sycamore, and alder are not present in the Studv Area. Saltmarsh Common CSC, BCC Frequents low, dense vegetation near water including Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Yellowthroat fresh to saline emergent wetlands. Brushy habitats habitat in emergent wetlands are not Geoth/ypis trichas used in migration. Forages among wetland herbs and present in the Study Area. sinuosa shrubs for insects primarily. Bell's Sage Sparrow esc, BCC Prefers dense chaparral and scrub habitats in breeding Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Amphispiza belli season. Found in more open habitats in winter. habitat in dense chaparral and scrub are not Dresent in the Studv Area. Alameda (South Bay) esc, BCC Found in saline emergent wetlands of the south bay. Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Song Sparrow Require low, dense vegetation for cover and nesting. habitat in saline emergent wetland and Me/ospiza me/odia dense vegetation are not present in the pusiffu/a Study Area. Tricolored Blackbird CSC,BCC Usually nests over or near freshwater in dense cattails Not Present. Suitable nesting and foraging Age/aius tricolor tules, or thickets of willow, blackberry, wild rose or ' habitat in freshwater dense cattail or other tall herbs. thickets of willow are not present in the Studv Area. Lawrence's Goldfinch Bee Inhabits oak woodlands, chaparral, riparian Unlikely. Suitable nesting and foraging Carduelis /awrencei woodlands, pinyon-juniper associations, and weedy habitat may be available in weedy areas in areas near water during the breeding season. the Study Area; however, not typically found Reptiles and Amphibians in urban areas. western pond turtle CSC Occurs in perennial ponds, lakes, rivers and streams Not Present. Suitable aquatic habitat is not C/emmys marmorata with suitable basking habitat (mud banks, mats of present in the Study Area. floating vegetation, partially submerged logs) and submerged shelter. California homed lizard CSC Occurs in valley-foothill hardwood, conifer and riparian Not Present. Suitable conifer, riparian, and Phrynosoma coronatum habitats, as well as in pine-cypress juniper and annual annual grass habitat are not present in the fronta/e grass habitats. Prefers sand areas, washes, flood Study Area. plains and wind-blown deposits. A-5 - - - Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence San Francisco garter FE, SE Found in the vicinity of freshwater marshes, ponds and Not Present. Suitable freshwater marsh snake slow moving streams. Prefers dense cover and water and pond habitat are not present in the Thamnophis sirtafis depths of at least one foot. Upland areas important. Study Area. tetrataenia California tiger FT,CSC Inhabits annual grass habitat and mammal burrows. Not Present. Suitable annual grass habitat, salamander Seasonal ponds and vernal pOOls crucial to breeding mammal burrow, and seasonal ponds are Ambystoma not present in the Study Area. cafifomiense California red-legged FT, CSC Associated with quiet perennial to intermittent ponds, Not Present. Suitable ponds, pools, and frog stream pools and wetlands. Prefers shorelines with wetland habitat are not present in the Study Rana aurora draytonii extensive vegetation. Documented to disperse Area. through upland habitats after rains. foothill yellow-legged CSC Found in or near rocky streams in a variety of habitats. Not Present. Suitable roclky stream habitat frog Feed on both aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates. is not present in the Study Area. Rana boylii Invertebrates vernal pool fairy shrimp FT Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools, Not Present. Suitable vemal pool habitat is Branchinecta /ynchi grassy swales, slumps, or basalt-flow depression not present in the Study Area. pools. vernal pool tadpole FE Pools commonly found in grass bottomed swales of Not Present. Suitable vernal pool habitat is shrimp unplowed grasslands. Some pools are mud-bottomed not present in the Study Area. Lepidurus packardi and highly turbid. ohlone tiger beetle FE The Ohlone tiger beetle is endemic to Santa Cruz Not Present. Although this species is Cicinde/a oh/one County where it is known only from coastal terraces historically found in San Mateo County, supporting remnant patches of native grassland Califomia oatgrass (Danthonia ca/ifomica) habitat. and purple needlegrass (Stipa pu/chra) are not oresent in the Studv Area. - A-6 - - Species Status * Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence San Bruno elfin butterfly FE Coastal, mountainous areas with grassy ground cover Not Present. Host plant Sedum Incisalia mossi bayensis mainly in the vicinity of San Bruno Mtn. Colonies are ' spathufifolium is not present in the Study located on steep, north-facing slopes within the fog Area. belt. Larval host plant is Sedum spathufifofium. Mission blue butterfly FE Inhabits grasslands of the San Francisco peninsula. Not Present. Host plant Lupinus albifrons, Icaricia icariodides Host plants: Lupinus albifrons, L. variico/or. and L. L. variicolor, and L. formosus are not missionensis formosus. present in the Study Area. Bay checkerspot FT Restricted to native grasslands on outcrops of Not Present. Host plant Plantago erect a is butterfly serpentine soil in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay. not present in the Study Area. Euphydryas editha Plantago erecta is the primary host plant. bayensis Callippe silverspot FE Restricted to northern coastal scrub of the San Not Present. Host plant Viola pedunculata butterfly Francisco peninsula, and grassy hills of Solano, is not present in the Study Area. Speyeria caJ/ippe Contra Costa, and Alameda counties. Host plant is caf/ippe Viola pedunculata. Myrtle's silverspot FE Restricted to areas immediately adjacent to the coast: Not Present. Host plant Viola adunca is not Speyeria zerene dunes, scrub, and grasslands. Host plant: Viola present in the Study Area. myrtleae adunca. Known from only 4 remaining populations. A-7 - - - - PLANTS . PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL. FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD San Mateo thorn-mint FE, SE, Chaparral, valley and foothill April-June Not present. Chaparral not present. Acanthomintha duttonii List 1B.1 grassland on serpentine soils. Serpentine soils are not present in the Study 50-300 m. Area. Franciscan onion List 1 B.2 Cismontane woodland; valley May-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable Allium peninsu/are var. and foothill grassland, often on quality to support this species. franciscanum serpentine soils. 100-300 m. bent-flowered fiddleneck List 1 B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, March-June Unlikely. Coastal bluff scrub and woodland Amsinckia lunaris cismontane woodland, valley habitats not present. Ruderal grassland of and foothill grassland. 3-500 unsuitable quality to support this species. m. Santa Cruz manzanita List 1 B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, November-April Unlikely. Small redwood and pine woodland Arctostaphylos chaparral, openings and in Orange Memorial Park but no shrub andersonii edges of North Coast species observed in the understory. coniferous forest. 60-730 m. Franciscan manzanita List 1 A Coastal scrub. 60-300 m. February-April Not Present. Presumed extinct in California. Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. franciscana Presidio manzanita FE,SE, Chaparral, coastal prairie, February-March Not Present. No native shrubs observed in Arctostaphylos hookeri List 1 B.2 coastal scrub, serpentine the Study Area. ssp. ravenii outcrop. 45-215 m. San Bruno Mountain SE, Chaparral, rocky coastal February-May Not Present. Chaparral and coastal scrub manzanita List 18.1 scrub. 275-370 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. Arctostaphylos imbricata Montara manzanita List 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub. January-March Not Present. Chaparral and coastal scrub Arctostaphy/os 150-500 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. montaraensis - - - A-8 - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD Kings Mountain List 1 B.2 Broadleaved upland forest, January-April Not Present. Species occurs at an elevation manzanita chaparral, North Coast range far above that of the Study Area. Arctostaphylos coniferous forest on granitic or regismontana sandstone soils. 305-730 m. marsh sandwort FE, SE, Bogs and fens, marshes and May-August Not Present. Marsh habitats not present in Arenaria paludico/a List 18.1 swamps. 3-170 m. the Study Area. coastal marsh milk-vetch List 1 B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, April-October Not Present. Coastal habitats and marsh Astragalus marshes and swamps. 0-30 habitats not present in the Study Area. pycnostachyus var. m. pycnostachyus alkali milk-vetch List 18.2 Playas, valley and foothill March-June Unlikely. Playas and vernal pools not Astragalus tener var. grassland, alkaline vernal present. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable tener pools. 1-60 m. quality to support species. San Joaquin spearscale List 1 B.2 Chenopod scrub, meadows April-October Unlikely. Chenopod scrub, meadows, seeps, Atriplex joaquiniana and seeps, playas, valley and and playas not present. Ruderal grassland of foothill grassland. unsuitable quality to support species. 1-835 m. pappose tarplant List 1B.2 Coastal prairie, meadows and May-November Unlikely. Coastal prairie and meadows not Centromadia parryi ssp. seeps, marshes and swamps, present. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable parryi valley and foothill grassland, quality to support species. often on alkaline soils. 2-420 m. San Francisco Bay List 1 B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal April-July Not Present. Coastal bluff scrub, dune, and spineflower dunes, coastal prairie, coastal prairie habitats not present in the Study Area. Chorizanthe cuspidata scrub. 3-215 m. var. cuspidata A-9 - - - - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD robust spineflower FE, Cismontane woodland, coastal April-September Not Present. Woodland, and coastal dune Chorizanthe robusta var. List 1B.1 dunes, coastal scrub on sandy and scrub habitats not present in the Study robusta or gravelly soils. 3-300 m. Area. Sonoma spineflower List 1 B.1 Coastal prairie on sandy soils. June-August Not Present. Coastal prairie not present in Chorizanthe valida 10-305 m. the Study Area. Franciscan thistle List 1 B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, March-July Not Present. Forest and coastal habitats not Cirsium andrewsii coastal bluff scrub, coastal present in the Study Area. prairie, mesic coastal scrub, sometimes on serpentine soils. 0-150 m. fountain thistle FE, SE, Chaparral, valley and foothill June-October Not present. Chaparral serpentine soils are Cirsium fontinale var. List1B.1 grasslands in serpentine not present in the Study Area. fontina/e seeps. 90-175 m. compact cobwebby List 1 B.2 Chaparral, coastal dunes, April-June Not Present. Chaparral, coastal dune, prairie thistle coastal prairie, coastal scrub. and scrub habitats not present in the Study Cirsium occidentale var. 5-150 m. Area. compactum Presidio c1arkia FE, SE, Coastal scrub, valley and May-July Unlikely. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable Clarkia franciscana List 1B.1 foothill grassland, sometimes quality to support this species. on serpentine soils. 25-335 m. round-headed Chinese List 1 B.2 Coastal dunes. 0-20 m. April-June Not Present. Coastal dune habitats not houses present in the Study Area. Collinsia corymbosa San Francisco collinsia List 1 B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, March-May Not Present. Closed-cone coniferous forest Collinsia mu/ticolor coastal scrub, sometimes on and coastal scrub habitats not present in the serpentine soils. 30-250 m. Study Area. - - A-10 - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD Point Reyes bird's beak List 1B.2 Marshes and swamps. June-October Not Present. Marsh and swamp habitats not Cordylanthus maritimus 0-10 m. present in the Study Area. ssp. palustris western leatherwood List 1B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, January-March Unlikely. Small redwood and pine woodland Dirca occidentafis closed-cone coniferous forest, in Orange Memorial Park but no hardwood chaparral, cismontane species observed in the understory. woodland, North Coast coniferous forest, riparian forest, mesic riparian woodland. 50-395 m. marsh horsetail List 3 Marshes and swamps. N/A Not Present. Marsh and swamp habitats not Equisetum pa/ustre 45-1000 m. present in the Study Area. Tiburon buckwheat List 3.2 Chaparral, coastal prairie, June-September Not Present. Serpentine soils not present in Eriogonum lutecIum var. valley and foothill grassland on the Study Area. caninum serpentine soils. 10-500 m. San Mateo woolly FE, SE, Cismontane woodland, often May-June Not Present. Cis montane woodland and sunflower List 1B.1 on serpentine soils and on serpentine soils not present in the StUdy Eriophyllum latifobum roadcuts. 45-150 m. Area. round-leaved fjlaree List 2.1 Cismontane woodland, valley March-May Unlikely. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable Erodium macrophyllum and foothill grassland on clay quality to support species. soils. 15-1200 m. Hillsborough chocolate List 1B.1 Cismontane woodland, valley March-April Not Present. Serpentine soils not present in lily and foothill grassland on the Study Area. Friti/faria bitlora var. serpentine soils. 150 m. ineziana A-11 - - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD fragrant fritillary List 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, coastal February-April Unlikely. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable Fritiffaria /iliacea prairie, coastal scrub, valley quality to support species. and foothill grassland, often on serpentine soils. 3-410 m. dune gilia List 18.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. April-July Not Present. Coastal dunes and scrub Gifia capitata ssp. 2-200 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. chamissonis dark-eyed gilia List 1 B.2 Coastal dunes. 2-30 m. April-July Not Present. Coastal dunes not present in Gilia miffefofiata the Study Area. San Francisco gumplant List 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal June-September Not Present. Coastal habitats and Grindelia hirsutula var. scrub, valley and foothill serpentine soils not present in the Study maritima grassland on sandy or Area. serpentine soils. 15.400 m. Diablo helianthella List 1B.2 Broadleaved upland forest, March-June Unlikely. Hardwood habitats not present in Hefianthelfa castanea chaparral, cismontane the Study Area and ruderal grassland of woodland, coastal scrub, unsuitable quality to support species. riparian woodland, valley and foothill grassland. 60-1300 m. short-leaved evax List 2.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal March-June Not Present. Coastal bluff scrub and dunes Hesperevax sparsiffora dunes. 0-215 m. not present in the Study Area. var. brevifolia Marin western flax FT, ST, Chaparral, valley and foothill April-July Not Present. Serpentine soils not present in Hesperofinon congestum List 18.1 grassland on serpentine soils. the Study Area. 5-370 m. Santa Cruz tarplant FT, SE, Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, June-October Unlikely. Ruderal grassland of unsuitable Holocarpha macradenia List 1B.1 valley and foothill grassland, quality to support species. often on clay or sandy soi Is. 10-220 m. - - - - A-12 - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD Kellogg's horkelia List 18.1 Closed-cone coniferous forest, April-September Not Present. Closed-cone coniferous forest, Horkelia cuneata ssp. chaparral, coastal scrub and shrubby habitats not present in Study sericea openings, on sandy or gravelly Area. soils. 10-200 m. Point Reyes horkelia List 1 B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal prairie, May-September Not Present. Coastal dunes, prairie and Horkefia marinensis coastal scrub on sandy soil. scrub habitats not present in the Study Area. 5.350 m. beach layia FE, SE, Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. March-July Not Present. Coastal dunes and scrub Layia camosa List 1B.1 0-60 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. coast yellow leptosiphon List 1 B. 1 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal April-May Not Present. Coastal bluff scrub and prairie Leptosiphon croceus prairie. 10-150 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. rose leptosiphon List 1B.1 Coastal bluff scrub. 0-100 m. April-July Not Present. Coastal bluff scrub habitats not Leptosiphon rosaceus present in the Study Area. Crystal Springs lessingia List 1 B.2 Cismontane woodland, coastal July-October Not Present. Serpentine soils not present in Lessingia arachnoidea scrub, valley and foothill the Study Area. grassland on serpentine soils and often on roadsides. 60- 200m. San Francisco lessingia FE, SE, Coastal scrub. 25-90 m. August-November Not Present. Coastal scrub habitat not Lessingia germanorum List 1B.1 present in the Study Area. woolly-headed lessingia List 3 Broadleaved upland forest, June-October Unlikely. Small redwood and pine woodland Lessingia holo/euca coastal scrub, lower montane in Orange Memorial Park with turf grass coniferous forest, valley and understory. Serpentine soils not present in foothill grassland on clay or the Study Area. serpentine soils. 15-305 m. A-13 - -, - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD coast lily List 1 B.1 Broadleaved upland forest, May-August Unlikely. Small redwood and pine woodland Ufium maritimum closed-cone coniferous forest, in Orange Memorial Park with turf grass coastal prairie, coastal scrub, understory. Marshes and swamps not marshes and swamps, North present in the Study Area. Coast coniferous forest. 5-335 m. San Mateo tree lupine List 3.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub. April-July Not Present. Chaparral and coastal scrub Lupinus eximius 90-550 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. Indian Valley bush List 1 B.2 Chaparral, cismontane April-October Not Present. Species occurs at an elevation mallow woodland, often in burned range above that of the Study Area. Malacothamnus areas. 150-1700 m. aboriginum arcuate bush mallow List 1 8.2 Chaparral, cismontane April-September Not Present. Chaparral and woodland Malacothamnus arcuatus woodland. 15-355 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. Davidson's bush mallow List 18.2 Chaparral, cismontane June-January Not Present. Species occurs at an elevation MaJacothamnus woodland, coastal scrub, range above that of the Study Area. davidsonii riparian woodland. 185-855 m. Hall's bush mallow List 1 B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub. May-September Not Present. Chaparral and coastal scrub Malacothamnus haffii 10-760 m. habitats not present in the Study Area. Mt. Diablo cottonweed List 3.2 Broadleaved upland forest, March-May Not Present. Hardwood habitats and rocky Micropus amphibolus chaparral, cismontane soils not present in the Study Area. woodland, valley and foothill grassland on rocky soils. 45-825 m. - - - - - A-14 - - - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS' HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD marsh microseris List 1 B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, April-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable Microseris paludosa cismontane woodland, coastal quality to support species. scrub, valley and foothill grassland. 5-300 m. white-rayed pentachaeta FE, SE, Valley and foothill grassland, March-May Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable Pentachaeta beffidiflora List 18.1 often on serpentine soils. quality to support species. Serpentine soils 35-620 m. not present in the Study Area. Choris's popcorn-flower List 1 B.2 Chaparral, coastal prairie, March-June Not Present. Chaparral, coastal prairie and Plagiobothrys chorisianus mesic coastal scrub. 15-160 scrub habitats not present in the Study Area. var. chorisianus m. San Francisco popcorn- SE, Coastal prairie, valley and March-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable flower List 1 B. 1 foothill grassland. 60-360 m. quality to support species. Coastal prairie not Plagiobothrys diffusus present in the Study Area. Hickman's cinquefoil FE, SE, Coastal bluff scrub, c1osed- April-August Not Present. Closed-cone forest, coastale Potentiffa hickmanii List 1B.1 cone coniferous forest, bluff scrub and marsh habitats not present in meadows and seeps, marshes the Study Area. and swamps. 10-135 m. adobe sanicle SR, Chaparral, coastal prairie, February-May Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable Sanicula maritima List 18.1 meadows and seeps, valley quality to support species. Chaparral, coastal and foothill grassland, on clay prairie, meadows, and serpentine soils not or serpentine soils. 30-240 m. present in the Study Area. San Francisco campion List 1 B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, chaparral, March-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable Silene verecunda ssp. coastal prairie, coastal scrub, quality to support species. Chaparral, coastal verecunda valley and foothill grassland on bluff scrub and prairie habitats not present in sandy soils. 30-645 m. the Study Area. California seablite FE, Marshes and swamps. July-October Not Present. Marshes and swamps not Suaeda califomica List 1B.1 0-15 m. present in the Study Area. A-15 - - PLANT SPECIES AND STATUS. HABITAT BLOOMING POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE COMMUNITIES PERIOD saline clover list 1 B.2 Marshes and swamps, valley April-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable Trifolium depauperatum and foothill grassland, vernal quality to support species. Marsh and vernal vaL hydrophilum pools. 0-300 m. pool habitats not present in the Study Area. San Francisco owl's- List 1B.2 Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, April-June Unlikely. Ruderal grassland not of suitable clover valley and foothill grassland, quality to support species. Serpentine soils Triphysaria fforibunda usually on serpentine soils. not present in the Study Area. 10-160 m. .Key to status codes: FE Federal Endangered FT Federal Threatened BCC USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern WBWG The Western Bat Work Group High Priority Species CFP CDFG Fully Protected Animal SE State Endangered ST State Threatened SR State Rare CSC California Species of Concern List 1A CNPS 1A List, Plant presumed extinct in CA List 1B.1 CNPS 1 B List, Endangered, Threatened, or Rare in CA; seriously endangered in CA List 1B.2 CNPS 1 B List, Endangered, Threatened, or Rare in CA; fairly endangered in CA List 2.1 CNPS 2 List, Endangered, Threatened, or Rare in CA, but more common elsewhere; seriously endangered in CA List 2.2 CNPS 2 List, Endangered, Threatened, or Rare in CA, but more common elsewhere; fairly endangered in CA List 3 CNPS 3 List, More information is needed, a review list List 3.2 CNPS 3 List, More information is needed, a review list; fairly endangered in CA - - - A-16 - - ..., APPENDIX 8 STUDY AREA PHOTOGRAPHS - ..... """ . of San Bruno Mountain Top an~ ~ottoBom. ~~ subtrunk location. at the HillSIde tJ Top: Ruderal grassland field at the 1$1 Street subtrunk location. Bottom: Redwood and pine stand at Orange Mernorial Park at the 1 $I Street subtrunk location. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 2 - - - - - Appendix 3 Draft Phase I ESA (Kleinfelder Associates) - - City of South San Francisco Initial Study/Phase II Wet Weather Page 60 III ~ ~p~y!e ~n! c~m~n? E R July 24, 2006 Project No. 71420/PWENV1 Mr. Kourosh Iranpour, P.E. Associate/Senior Project Manager Harris & Associates 120 Mason Circle Concord, California 94520 Subject: Dear Mr. Iranpour: As requested, enclosed is ovided; however, we recommend that the ensive understanding of the items contained Respectfully submitted, KLEINFELDER, INC. James A. Lehrman, PG, CHG, REA Environmental Group Manager John Williams Staff Geologist 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc}/jmk Page 1 of 1 July 24,2006 Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. KLEINFELDER 7133 KolI Center Parkway, Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA 94566-3101 (925) 484-1700 (925) 484-5838 fax - III KLEIN FELDER July 24, 2006 This document was prepared for use only by the client, only for the purposes stated, and within a reasonable time from issuance. Non-commercial, educational and scientific use of this report by regulatory agencies is regarded as a "fair use" and not a violation of copyright. Regulatory agencies may make additional copies of this document for internal use. Copies may also be made available to the public as required by law. The reprint must acknowledge the copyright and indicate that permission to reprint has been received. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. July 24, 2006 III KLEIN FELDER A Report Prepared for: Mr. Kourosh Iranpour, P.E. Associate/Senior Project Manager Harris & Associates 120 Mason Circle Concord, California 94520 50% DRAFT LIMITED PHASE I/PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WET WEATHER PROGRAM PHASE II SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Kleinfelder Job No: 71420/PWEN 1 Prepared by: James A. Lehrman, PG, CHG, REA Environmental Group Manager KLEINFELDER, INC. 7133 KolI Center Parkway, Suite 100 Pleasanton, California 94566 (925) 484-1700 (925) 484-5838 (Fax) Date: July 24, 2006 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. July 24, 2006 - III KLEIN FELDER TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Paae 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. I" ..... II... .... ... ... I' I' .... 1...1.....1. ....1. ...... .....1. ... ...... .... ..... ..... 1 2 INTRODUCTION.....I.. ........ ... ..... ,..1.1 ....... ........ ........1.. .... ... ...... 1.1 .... ..... ................. ......1.... 3 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5. 2.6. 3 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 4 PUR POSE ... ....... ........ ... ... ....... ..... ....................... ........ ....... ... ....... ... .......... 3 DETAILED SCOPE-OF~SERVICES .......... ..... ........................................4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ...................... ........... ......................................5 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS .......... ............ .........................................5 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS... .................. ....................................5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITI . . ...... ........ ................................ 6 4.3. - - 4.4. 4.5. 4.6. 5 HISTORY OF THE SITE .................................................................................... 37 5.1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ....................................................................... 37 5.1.1. Hillside ...................................................................................... 38 5.1 .2. Airport ...................... ............. ............................._...................... 39 5_1.3. Victory...... .... .... .......... ..... ...... ........................ ....... ........ ....... ...... 40 5.1.4. Portola ...................................................................................... 41 5.1.5. First......... .................. ............. ............................. ..... ................. 42 5.1.6. Westborough ............................................................................ 43 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page i of iii July 24,2006 III KLEIN FELDER 5.2. SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS..................................................... 43 5.2.1. Hillside ......................................................................................44 5.2.2. Airport .. ....... ...... .......................... ........................... ................... 44 5.2.3. Victory.. .......................... ........... ................... ......... .................... 44 5.2.4. Portola ... .................. ...... .......... ................... ......................... ..... 44 5.2.5. Fi rst........................................................................................... 45 5.2.6. Westborough .......... ........... ................... ............. .............. ......... 45 5.3. CITY DIRECTORI ES ........ ................... ......... ....... .................... ..... .......... 45 5.4. HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP REVI . ......................................45 5.4.1. Hillside .................................... ........... ....................................46 5.4.2. Airport ................................. ............ ..__.... .............................. 46 5.4.3. Victory.............................. ........ ........ .................................. 46 5.4.4. Portola ......................... ......... ....... ......... ............................. 46 5.4.5. First.......... ................ ................. ......... ................................. 46 5.4.6. Westborough ........ ........ ......... .............. ......... .................... 47 .. .... ........... ........ .... .... ..... 50 6 7 8 8.2. 8.3. 9 EV ALUA TI ON ..... ... .... ........... ..... .......................... ....... ........... .................. .......... 52 9.1 . P HAS E I................................................................................................... 52 9.1.1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 52 9.1.2. DEVIATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERViCES.......................... 52 9.1.3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................... 52 9.2. PHASE 11...... .......................... .................. ......................................-......... 53 9.3. RECOMMENDATIONS.......... .............. ................. ......... ............ .............. 53 10 REFERE NC ES ........................ ..... .... ........ ................ .................... ............. ... ...... 54 71420/PW ENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page ii of Hi July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) TABLES 1-1 Boring Locations and Sample Analyses 3-1 Location and Legal Description 3-2 Current/Proposed Uses 3-3 Adjoining Properties 4-1 Records Review & Search Distance 4-2 Records Review & Search Distance Based 4-3 Physical Setting 5-1 Historical Sources 5-2 Historical Aerial Photographs Revie 5-3 Sanborn Maps Reviewed 5-4 Historical Topographic Maps Reviewe 1 2 3 4 Site Location Map Site Map Site Photograph Site Photographs - PLATES - APPENDICE - A en al fessionals B Regulatory Ag cy t ase Report (on attached compact disc) C Interview Docum tation D Historical Research cu entation (on attached compact disc): Historical Aerial otographs Sanborn Map Search Results Historical Topographic Maps E Laboratory Analytical Results F Soil Boring Logs 71420/PWENV1/( PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page Hi of Hi July 24, 2006 - k.q KLEINFELDER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Limited Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed for Harris & Associates (Client) for six linear reaches located in South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California (See Plate 1, Site Location Map), The methodology used in the preparation of this report was based generally on th merican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Practice for Environ ental 'te Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E1527- ,Th cope of services for this report was developed, however, to provide a p, "n cree 'ng of properties within the study area that may pose a potential h ardo s maten s co ern to the project. Kleinfelder did not evaluate potential haza ous ate' issues the egree required to meet the ASTM standard for property acqu' ition urp . Hillside - Hillsi . ities Boulevard to Baden Avenue, t ypress Avenue, Cypress Avenue from nd Armour Avenue from Cypress Avenue to . First - First St at fr EI amino Real to the eastern terminus of First Street, angling southeast ng th railroad line, east across the railroad line, generally north, along parcel line see Site Plans on Plates 2 and 3) . Victory - Victory Avenue from Spruce Avenue to South Linden Avenue . Portola - From EI Cortez Avenue northeast to Portola Avenue, continuing along Portola Avenue to Francisco Drive, Francisco Drive from Portola Avenue to Sonora Avenue . Westborough - Del Monte Avenue from Nyla Avenue to Arroyo Drive, Arroyo Drive from Del Monte Avenue to its northern terminus, continuing northeast to the intersection of Oak Avenue and Mission Road, Mission Road from Oak Avenue to Chestnut Avenue, continuing southwest generally following parcel 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of 54 July 24, 2006 - kq KLEINFELDER boundaries to Westborough Boulevard between EI Camino Real and Camaritas Avenue, southwest along Westborough Boulevard to south of Camaritas Avenue, from Westborough Boulevard to Arroyo Drive south of Camaritas Avenue. (see Site Plans on Plates 2 and 3) - We have performed a Limited Phase I/Phase II ESA based on a modification of the scope and limitations of American Society for Te ing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-05, to meet the data needs for t pro et, as indicated by Harris and Associates. Based on the results of the Ph e I p ion of our Limited Phase I/Phase II assessment, Kleinfelder identified ogni ed vironmental Conditions (RECs) associated with each segment of the roje. or t R s, we then identified potential chemicals of concern for the pur oses ou Phase sam ing and analysis activities. The potential chemicals of conce for ct seg nt re: . and - As part of a separate geotechnical investigation of the project being conducted by Kleinfelder (report not yet released), we performed soil and groundwater sampling at specified boring locations. Potential chemicals of concern were identified for each boring location based on the proximity of documented release sites we identified during the Phase I data research. The selected analyses for each location are shown in Table 1-1. In addition to these findings, deviations, historical environmental conditions, and de minimus findings are discussed in Chapter 8 of this report. This report is subject to the limitations in Section 2.5. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER 2 INTRODUCTION The following report is a summary of work performed using the guidelines set forth in the ASTM Standard E-1527 -05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM Standard). This report also generally conforms to the ASTM Standard's suggest able of contents. Format modifications have been made to the ASTM Standar s sug sted table of contents by Kleinfelder to assist in better reading and under anding e report findings, and to conform to the project-specific modifications to ST tan d scope-of-work. 2.1. PURPOSE The prese azardous substances or petroleum product on a that indicate an existing release, a past release, or release of any hazardous substances or petroleum on the property or into the ground, ground water, or su ce er 0 the property. The term includes hazardous substances or pe leum oducts even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not nded to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. This report describes Kleinfelder's assessment methodology and documents our assessment findings, subject to the limitations presented in Section 2.5 of this report. 71420/PWENV1 /(PLE6R257 .doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 3 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k~ KLEINFELDER 2.2. DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERV1CES The following sections describe Kleinfelder's work scope: · Section 2, Introduction, includes a discussion of the purpose/reason for performing the Limited Phase I/Phase II ESA, additional services requested by the Client (Le" an evaluation of business environmental risk factors associated with the subject site), significant assumptions ',e., roperty boundaries if not marked in the tield), limitations, exceptions nd s cial terms and conditions (Le., contractual), and user reliance param ers. . . · ite, s marizes the history of the subject site and rties. T s si history is based on various sources which may include: a review historic aerial photographs, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, historical topographic a ,building department records, and results of previous site assessments. · Section 6, Site Reconnaissance, describes Kleintelder's observations during the site reconnaissance. The methodology used and limiting conditions are described. · Section 7, Interviews, is a summary ot telephone and personal interviews conducted with local government officials, and the Client. · Section 8, Phase II ESA, describes the field activities and analytical results of soil and groundwater sampling activities. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 4 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEIN FELDER . Section 9, Evaluation, is a presentation of our findings and opinions regarding the information in Sections 3 through 7, and presents our conclusions regarding the presence of RECs connected with the sit. . Section 10, References, is a summary of some of the resources used to compile this report. Pertinent documentation regarding the subject site is included in appendices of this report. 2.4. 2.3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Groundwater is estimated to flow This estimation is based on surface 2.5. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS Phase I ESAs are non-comprehensive by nature and may not identify all environmental problems, and will not eliminate all risk. This report is a qualitative assessment. Kleinfelder offers a range of investigative and engineering services to suit the needs of our clients, including more quantitative investigations. Although risk can never be eliminated, more detailed and extensive investigations yield more information, which may help the Client understand and better manage risks. Since such detailed services involve greater expense, we ask our clients to participate in identifying the level of 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 5 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER service, which will provide them with an acceptable level of risk. Please contact the signatories of this report if you would like to discuss this issue of risk further. Kleinfelder performed this Limited Phase I/Phase II ESA in general accordance with the guidelines set forth in the ASTM Standard, and the proposed scope subsequently approved by our Client. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. Environmental issues not specifically addressed in this re ort were beyond the scope of our services and not included in our evaluation. 2.6. No special terms and conditions in addition to those discussed previously (Le., project- specific modifications to the standard ASTM 1527-05 scope-of-work to meet the project data needs) were agreed to either by the Client or Kleinfelder in our Proposal Number 01204PROP (document SJ06P035), dated March 9, 2006. 71420/PWENV1/( PLE6R257 .doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 6 of 54 July 24, 2006 k.q KLEINFELDER 3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site description is presented in this section and describes the condition of the site at the time of the Limited Phase I/Phase II ESA. The site location is shown on Plate 1. Tables 3-1 through 3-5 summarize the physical characteristics of the site and adjoining properties. 3.1. LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION out an ncisco, San Mateo Count , California nshl 2 South and Range 5 West (Source: United tat eologic Service, San Francisco South, C Iifornia Quadran Ie, 7.5 Minute Ma 3.2. SE OF THE PROPERTY Land use on site and in the general vicinity appeared to be vacant on site; residential to the west, north and northeast; and recreational/open space to the south and southeast at the time of Kleinfelder's assessment. Current and proposed uses are described in Table 3-2. 71420/PWENV1/{PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 7 of 54 July 24,2006 - III KLEINFELDER TABLE 3-2 CURRENTIPROPOSEDUSES B~~~~~i!4~tf1l:;;;~~1ffl~:Z.:- "~.'.:~;. '>-"".', .~. ',' ~. ~- r.,~,.,:, co".:;- "". '..~. C.'-'~,;T'-'-, ':--" __,' ':" ;-';:;;'''j ~~tJi.~_-:.....:..~__.'@Ei@JfJj @(~~lS.WJr~:GLf.:y '~~...~~j CURRENT USE PROPOSED USE Various - includin residential and industrial. Installation and/or re lacement of sewer trunks. 3.3. CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PROPERl S Kleinfelder performed a brief drive-by survey 0 the subject site on July 17, 2006. A sum ry of presented in Table 3-3. - Air ort -, First Hillside - Portola 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jrn k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 8 of 54 July 24, 2006 k.~ KLEINFELDER 4 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that would help to evaluate RECs of potential concern in connection with subject site and bordering properties. E 4-1 RCH DISTANCES AND FINDINGS Total Number of Facilities Listed 0.25 miles o 1 7 0.25 miles 0.25 miles 0.25 miles 1 0.25 miles 0.25 miles 0.25 miles o 6 84 7 0.25 miles 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 9 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Total Number of Facilities Listed 0.25 miles 0.25 miles 0.25 miles 0.25 miles Hazardous Material Incident 0.25 iles o 2 3 76 22 - 3 o 1 118 5, 58, 74 10 15 293 305 - RECORDS - FEDERAL Airport NPl (National p' rity 0 0 0 0 0 List CERClIS 0 0 0 0 0 (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Information S stem CERClIS NFRAP 300 0 0 0 1 0 0 (No Further Remedial feet Action Planned RCRA (Resource 300 0 0 0 1 0 0 Conservation and feet Recovery Act) CORRACTS ( Corrective Actions Site 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 10 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER Total Number of Facilities Listed FEDERAL West- First Portola Victory Hillside Airport borouah RCRA non- 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORRACTS TSD feet (Transfer Storage and Disposal) RCRA LQG (Large 300 0 0 1 0 0 0 Quantity Generators) feet ^ RCRA SQG (Small 300 6 1 Y f>7 0 17 Quantity Generators) feet ERNS (Emergency 300 1 0 / 0 0 0 1 Response Notification feet ~ ~ System) ~^ STATE West - First Portola Victory Hillside Airport borouah AWP (Annual Work 300 0 ~~ ~) O~ )0 0 Plan) feet BEP (Bond 300 ~ O~ O( 0 0 0 Expenditure Plan) feet ~ Calsites 300 0\ ~~ r----. ~ "- ~O 0 0 feet CORTESE 3~~ K \ r-.~ ~ / 4 3 16 fe CHMIRS (California r--~' P1L ~' /'iV 1 0 7 Hazardous Material Incident Report > System) ~ Notify 65 / 30~ ~O~ ~ 0 0 0 1 Weet Toxic Pits ~< Ne~ "\, 1)- 0 0 0 0 0 State Landfill '" ~;~ D 0, 0 0 0 0 1 LUST (Leaking ~ lJ 1 1 4 4 26 Underground Storage Tank) UST (Underground 300 1,5,6 0,0,2 0,1,0 0,3,4 0,2,3 0,9,13 Storage Tank) & FID feet (Facility Inventory Database) & HIST UST CLEANERS 300 5 0 0 0 0 1 feet CA SlIC (Spills, 300 0 0 0 2 2 3 Leaks, Investigation feet and Cleanup) HAZNET 300 22 1 4 23 8 50 feet SAN MATEO CO. 300 15 6 3 26 10 60 BUSINESS LIST feet 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 11 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER EDR utilizes a geographical information system to plot the locations of reported incidents. This information is reviewed by Kleinfelder to help establish whether the site or nearby properties have been included on the noted databases and lists. The EDR report includes maps, which show the locations of the regulated properties with respect to the site (Page 2 and 3 of EDR's report), and a summary of pertinent information for these properties, including the responsible party, the prop' rty address, the distance and direction from the site, and the databases and lists on hicH e property appears (see Executive Summary pages 1 through 4 of the EDR port). - 4.2. DATABASE DESCRIPTIONS records found in the vicinity of the pr . 4.2.1. Federal CERCLlS NFRAP is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action ctivit. T s report shows which nationally-defined corrective actl co events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. RCRA LOG RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. Large quantity generators generate over 1,000 - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 12 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. CHMIRS The database includes selective information on sites which generate transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. Small quantity generators generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of h zardous waste per month. RCRA SOG ERNS 4.2.2. State and Local CORTESE NOTI FY 65 Notify 65 records contain facility notifications about any release that could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The data come from the State Water Resources Control board's Proposition 65 database. STATE LANDFILL The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 130154 July 24, 2006 - kq KLEINFELDER Management Board's Solid Waste Information System database. LUST UST The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control board Leaking Undergro n Storage Tank Information System. FID - HIST UST CLEANERS I d facilities that have EPA 10 numbers. cilitl with certain SIC codes: power laundries, mil nd om rcial; garment pressing and cleaner's agents; line s pply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning p nts exc t rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial laun r s; laundry and garment services. CA SLlC SLlC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. HAZNET The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from manifests ..... - 71420/PW ENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 14 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KlEINFElDER submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD 10, waste category, & disposal method. The source is the Department of toxic Substance Control is the agency. SAN MATEO CO. BUSINESS LIST Hazardous Materials Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Generator, Un rground Storage tanks. 4.3. RESULTS OF DATABASE SEARCH 4.3.1. Hillside ulev d, is on the CORTESE, bases. It had 3 USTs of c 01 Street, is on the HAZNET database Co. Business List and mixed oil. Lonati Properties, located at 900 Linden Avenue, is on the CORTESE, LUST, and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had a release discovered in 1987 that affected groundwater other than drinking water. MTBE was detected at a concentration of 680 parts per billion in groundwater and 3,500 parts per million in soil. The current case status is "Post remedial action monitoring." Linden Auto Repair Shop, located at 900 Linden Avenue, is on the FID database. It has an active UST of unknown capacity. South City Beacon, located at 905 Linden Avenue, is on the HAZNET database as a generator of oil-containing waste. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 15 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER South City Texaco, located at 905 Linden Avenue, is on the HAZNET, LUST, CORTESE, FIO, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had 4,000 gallon premium, 6,000 gallon regular, 8,000 gallon unleaded and 200 gallon . waste oil historical USTs. It had a release detected in 1985 that affected groundwater other than drinking water. MTBE was detected at a concentration of 69 parts per billion in groundwater and 3.2 parts per million in soil. It achieved closure in 2003. It has active USTs and is a generator of was oil. - - Encore Auto List for stora solvents. AAA Transmission Spec' lists, ocated at 942 Linden Avenue, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List for sto e of hazardous materials and generation/recycling of waste oil and solvents. Quick & Go, located at 905 Linden Avenue, generator of waste oil and mixed oil. Standard Electric, located at 930 Linden Preliminary Site Assessment is underw . AZN ET database as a - - nue, is on the San Mateo a tI as a generator of <27 - 5 Li den Avenue, is on the HAZNET and enerator of solvent and oil wastes. venue, is on the San Mateo Co. Business sand generation/recycling of waste oil and SBN Property, located at 950 Linden Avenue is on the LUST and SLlC databases. A Preliminary Site Assessment is underway. Warach Associates, located at 925 Linden Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It generates empty containers as waste and is the location of UST of unknown type and capacity. - 71420/PW ENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 16 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER Bay Area Bus Repair, located at 935 Linden Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It is a generator of various organic liquid mixtures, generates waste oil and solvent waste, and is used for tire storage. Based on the above listed businesses the following potential chemicals of concerns were identified for soils and groundwater within the Hillside segment of the project: . Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline, di . Volatile organic carbons (VOCs); hexavalent . Chromium (Hex Chrom); . Title 22 metals (CAM 17); . Semivolatile organic carbons (SVOC . Polychlorinated biphenyls (P 4.3.2. Airport Equilon Enterprises, 10 generation of organic so s Tosco Corporation Station #30665, located at 901 Airport Boulevard, is on the HAZNET database for organic residue and organic liquid mixture wastes. Union Oil/Unocal, located at 901 Airport Boulevard, is on the FID, LUST, NOTIFY 65, HAZNET, CORTESE, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has an active LUST case, discovered in 1988 that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The current case status is "Post remedial action monitoring." It had 2 former USTs and is an active UST location. It stores fuels and or waste, generates waste oil and stores tires. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 17 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Common Auto Parts Inc, located at 915 Airport Boulevard, is on the FID, HAZNET, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It generates organic _ residue, oil containing, and organic solid waste. It stores hazardous materials and tires. It had 1 former UST and is an active UST location. - National Glass, located at 945 Airport Boulevard, is on the FID and San Mateo Co. Business List databases as an active UST location. 600 Dubuque Street is San Carlos Auto Wreckers, located at 959 Airport database. No information is given. West Coast Clean Care, Inc, located at 967 Ai San Mateo Co. Business List database generation of organic residue waste. 733 Airport Boulevard is on the CHMIRS a an unspecified substance. Bahay Kubo, located at 751 generation of asbestos-c Bressie & Company, HAZNET and LUS - - 1991 release of HAZN ET database for - e Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for RS database. No information is provided. - Patel Property, located at 7 ypress Avenue, is on the LUST, SLle, and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. The LUST case affected groundwater other than drinking water and is now closed. The SLlC case is closed. The site stores, generates and recycles fuels, waste oil and/or solvents. Valencia Bros, located at 720 Cypress Avenue, is on the RCRA-SQG database. No violations are reported. Pyramid Van & Storage, located at 479 Airport Boulevard, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List database for "UGT SERVICES/HR." - - - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 18 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER Shell, located at 515 Airport Boulevard, is on the LUST database. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1986 and the case achieved closure in 1995. Housing Construction, located at 821 Cypress Avenue, is on the LUST, HAZNET and CORTESE databases. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1990 and the case achieved closure in 2000. It is also a generator of waste oil. Armour/Airport Boulevard is on the CHMI Aamco Transmissions, located at a UST of unlisted capacity. database for a 1988 release of ubuque Avenue, is on the HAZNET waste. EOS Biotechnolog Inc, ca ed a 870 Dubuque Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business ist aatab ses for unspecified solvent mixture waste, organic solids with halogens an or nic liquids with halogens and storage of hazardous materials. Rockwell Collins, located at 830 Dubuque Avenue, is on the RCRA-SQG database. No RCRA violations are reported. Healthdyne Home Infusion Therapy Inc, located at 844 Dubuque Avenue, is on the RCRA-SQG database. No RCRA violations are reported. North State Environmental Laboratory, located at, is on the RCRA-SQG and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It generates 6-25 tons of hazardous waste per year. It stores fuels or waste. No RCRA violations are noted 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 19 of 54 July 24, 2006 - kq KLEINFELDER Bressie & Co, located at 780 Dubuque Avenue, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It stores fuels or waste, generates <27 gallons of waste per year and has a UST. Volonte Automotive, located ,at 616 Linden Avenue, is on the LUST, CORTESE and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1965 and the case achieved closure in 2001. It is also a generator aste oil/solvent, stores fuel or waste and has a UST. - Wells Fargo Bank, located at 381 Airpo organic liquid mixture and organic solids. - - - 1 Airport Boulevard, is on the CORTESE - Peninsula Auto Bod, loca at 11 Airport Boulevard, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business Li da~a ses for recycling of solvent mixture waste, storage of fuels or waste and storage tires. South City Ford Service Center, located at 411 Airport Boulevard, is on the RCRA- SQG and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. South San Francisco Printing, located at 215 Miller Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for photochemicalsJphotoprocessing waste. Pyramid Printing & Graphics, located at 226/230 Miller Avenue, is on the HAZNET, and San Mateo Co. Business List databases for photochemicals/photoprocessing waste and liquids with halogenated organic compounds. It stores and generates waste from oil, fuel and solvents. - - - - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jrnk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 20 of 54 July 24, 2006 k,q KLEIN FELDER Shell Service Station, located at 248 Airport Boulevard, is on the LUST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has an active LUST case, discovered in 2004, which affected groundwater other than drinking water. The current case status is "Leak being confirmed." It stores fuels and or waste, generates waste and stores tires. Ken Funk Property, located at 248 Airport Boulevard, is on the LUST database. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater ot than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1989 and the case achi ed cl ure in 1998. John Klein/Klein Machine Shop, located at 305 and San Mateo Co. Business List databas & recycles waste oil/solvents. UST. South City Ford, cate Airport Boulevard, is on the HAZNET, LUST, CORTESE, FID an an KIIateo o. Business List databases. It has a closed LUST case that affected gro d ter other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1991 and the case achieved closure in 2001. It generates waste oils and various organic liquid wastes. It is an active UST location. It stores hazardous materials and tires. Costco Gasoline, located at 479 Airport Boulevard, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It stores fuels or waste and has at least one UST. Lux Avenue/Airport Boulevard is on the CHMIRS database for a 1996 release of sewage into a storm drain. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 21 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER - Paper Transpo , locate 6 E active US 10catiS6 Ryder Truck Re I, 10 te t 1 6 No violations are art. Olympian, located at 18 ran Avenue, is on the HAZNET, LUST, and CORTESE databases. It has a close ST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1990 and the case achieved closure in 1996. It generates waste oils. Bonis Body Shop, located at 110 Lux Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It stores hazardous materials and tires and generates & recycles waste oil/solvents. Harbor Auto Body, located at 512 Cypress Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It stores hazardous materials and tires and generates & recycles waste oil/solvents. Olympic Auto Service, located at 401 Linden Avenue IS the HAZNET, CORTESE and LUST databases. It has an active LUST case, scovered in 1991, which affected groundwater other than drinking ater. Tti current case status is "Remedial action (cleanup) Underway." te hyd organic solid waste. - - - - - enue, is on the HIST UST database. enue, is on the FID database. It is an Grand Avenue, is on RCRA-SQG database. - - East Grand Olympic, located at 190 East Grand Avenue, is on the LUST, CORTESE and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has an active LUST case, discovered in 1987, which affected groundwater other than drinking water. The current case status is "Remedial action (cleanup) Underway." It stores fuels, waste and hazardous materials, generates waste and has at least one active UST. City of South San Francisco Public Works, located at 201 Grand Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for generation of asbestos-containing waste. - - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 22 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KlEINFElDER Mattison & Shidler, located at 205 Grand Avenue, is on SLlC database. The SLlC case is closed. Britannie Point Grand LP, located at 210 Grand Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for contaminated soil from site clean-ups. City of S San Francisco/Housing & Community, located at 223-225 Grand Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for inorganic solid and asbestos-containing wastes. Grant Union 76/Tosco Corporation Station, locate at 2 Airport Boulevard, is on HAZNET database for waste oils and organic Ii Id wast s. 221 Airport Boulevard is on the CHMIRS data is on the RCRA-SOG on t e San Mateo Co. Business List on the HAZNET database for waste Avenue, is on the San Mateo Co. Wright Cleaners, locate at 31 is on the RCRA-SOG, HAZNET, LUST, SLlC, CLEANERS d San Mateo Co. Business List databases. The LUST case affected groundwater other than drinking water. Further information was not provided. The SLlC case is currently in the "Pollution Characterization" stage. It is a drycleaning facility. It generates halogenated organic compounds, stores hazardous materials and has a UST. No RCRA violations were reported. Tyle Color, located at 338 Grand Avenue, is on the RCRA-SOG, HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It generates metal sludge and waste oil/solvents. No RCRA violations were reported. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jrnk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 23 of 54 July 24, 2006 - kq KLEINFELDER - Airport Olympic, located at 100 Baden Avenue, is on the FID and HIST UST databases. It has 4 former USTs with capacities of 1,000, 6,000, 8,000 and 10,000 gallons. It is an inactive UST location. Eschelbach Properties, located at 100 Baden Avenue, is on the LUST, CORTESE and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release was discovered in 1990 and the case achieved closure in 2001. It has f USTs. - - - - - is the HAZNET and San eous organic residues and us materials. - - 2 Baden Avenue, is on the RCRA- Busine List databases. It stores hazardous on solvents. No RCRA violations were - .. - Airport Boulevard Service Stn, located at 190 Airport Boulevard, is on the LUST, CORTESE and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It has a closed LUST case that affected groundwater other than drinking water. The release date was 1994 and the case achieved closure in 1997. It has at least one UST. Borba Mfg, Inc, located at 196 Airport Boulevard, is on the RCRA-SQG database. No RCRA violations were reported. Caltrans Grand Avenue Site, located at Highway 101 at Grand Avenue, is on the RCRA-SQG and HAZNET databases. It disposes of contaminated soil from site clean-ups. No RCRA violations were reported. -- - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 24 of 54 July 24, 2006 - h..q KLEINFELOER The following locations/businesses have records in the San Mateo Co. Business List for storage of tires, storage of hazardous materials and/or generation/recycling of waste oil/solvents: Instant Printing Airport Auto Nextel Site ID CA-852 United Signs Don & Jerry Automotive Inc House of Color City Grille & Radiator Jorgu Tool Company Als Body Shop A's Auto Shell Repair Two Guns Press Forman Leibrock Inc US Airconditioning Lincare 101 Trucking Carlos R A ESDetail s ~ Borba Manufa urin nc South City Press Luxu ry Tyle Color Proteolix Inc Rinat Neuroscience Grand Auto Service Pan Ready Foods Inc Based on the above listed businesses the following potential chemicals of concern were identified for the Airport segment of the project: . TPHgdmo, · VOCs, · Hex Chrom, 71420/PWENV1 /(PLE6R257 .doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 25 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER - · CAM 17, · SVOCs, and · PCBs. - 4.3.3. Victory Brentway Inc, located at 170 South Spruce Avenue, is on the FID database for one or more active USTs. - Public Storage, located at 160 South Spruce Ave latex waste; off-specification, aged, or sur solution. the HAZNET database for d unspecified alkaline - .... an Mateo Co. re total organic - - enue, is on the HAZNET metal sludge and aqueous th Spruce Avenue, is on the RCRA , CORRACTS, and CERCLlS NFRAP mpany (IPC) was a 2.29 acre property in - - - California Collision Clinic, located at 476A Victory Avenue, is on the RCRA-SQG database. Laidlaw Transit Services Inc, located at 450 Victory Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for organic residue waste. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 26 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Early American Paint & Varnish Co. located at 476 Victory Avenue, is on the RCRA- SQG, HAZNET, LUST, CORTESE, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. One RCRA violation in 1985 was reported. The area of violation was generator-general requirements. It had three 550-gallon USTs. A UST release of miscellaneous motor vehicle fuels was reported in 1986. The case affected groundwater other than drinking water. The case achieved closure in 2000. The site is noted as generating household waste, g erating & recycling waste oil/solvents, storing tires, motor vehicle fuels or was ,an hazardous materials. Royalty Auto Collision Center, located at 476- database for unspecified solvent mixture wa US Autobody, located at 215 South Mapl unspecified solvent mixture waste. e LUST, CORTESE and San iscellaneous motor vehicle ater other than drinking 5 .ctory Avenue, Unit G, is on the 320 Victory is drain. 2004 release of sewage into a storm VI Y Avenue, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo It generates oxygenated solvent waste, organic nts. It also stores tires and hazardous materials. Giannini Garden Ornament , nc, located at 344 Victory Avenue, is on the HAZNET database for organic solids waste. Rollin J Lobaugh Inc, located at 240 Ryan Way, is on the RCRA-SQG, HAZNET, FID, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had one 275 gallon UST and is an active UST location. It is noted as a generator of waste oil, mixed oil, halogenated organic compounds and organic solids. It also stores tires and hazardous materials. Gold Star Co, located at 233 Ryan Way, is on the HAZNET database for unspecified solvent mixture waste. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 27 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Frank Anderson, located at 230 Ryan Way, is on the HAZNET database for asbestos- containing waste. Steven Engineering Inc, located at 230 and 224 Ryan Way, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases as a generator of organic solids waste. Coyne Cylinder Company, located at 224 Ryan Way, is on the LUST, CORTESE, SLlC, FID, HIST UST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had one former 8000 gallon UST and is an active UST 10 tic It has two active LUST cases. A UST release of miscellaneous motor v ide fu s on September 26, 1986 was reported in 1992. The case affected g~ undwater ther than drinking water. The status is "Post remedial action monitor' g. S elea of gasoline occurred on September 9, 1989. The case affe ed gr ndwater er n drinking water. The case status is "Pollution characteri tion. - - - Pro Star Automotive, located at 21 violations are noted. - No - an ay, is on the HAZNET and San It nerates organic solids, hydrocarbon oil/solvents. It also stores hazardous - - - us Autobody, located at 215 Ryan Way, is on the HAZNET database for solvent mixture waste. The following locations/businesses have records in the San Mateo Co. Business List for storage of tires, storage of hazardous materials and/or generation/recycling of waste oil/solvents: - ..., Trap's Tire & Auto Center 490 Victory Avenue 71420/PWENV1/{PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 28 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KlEINFElDER Modern Auto Tech Terminal brass & Aluminum Foun Moerman Clarke Inc Tech Auto Repair Autos For Aids, Inc. Hebrew Academy Mikes Automotive Quality Mobile Truck SVC Central Roofing, I nc Taylormade Automotive Inc Auto Axcess Collision New World Construction Sunny Construction Euro Car SVC G F Automotive G F Automotive . tial chemicals of concern were Based on the above list identified for the Victory . 4_3.4. Portola Quality Asbestos Control, located at 301 South Spruce Avenue, is on the RCRA SQG database. Louis J. Poletti, located at 363-393 EI Camino Real, is on the HAZNET database as a generator of asbestos-containing waste. W G Payne Construction Co Inc, located at 363 EI Camino Real, is on the RCRA SQG database. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 29 of 54 July 24, 2006 - tt..q KLEINFELDER - Donald M Butera DC, located at 367 EI Camino Real, is on the HAZNET database as a generator of photochemicals/photoprocessing waste and metal sludge. South City Dodge, located at 393 EI Camino Real, is on the CORTESE, LUST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had a diesel release, affecting soils only, detected in 1991. The case achieved closure in 1992. Village Lincoln Mercury/Walgreens #3346, located at 393 EI Camino Real, is on the CORTESE, HAZNET, RCRA LOG, FID and Sa Mateo Co. Business List databases. It is a generator of photochemic /pho processing waste, is a generator and recycler of waste oil/solvents, a has n active UST of unknown capacity. Gotelli Auto Supply/Gotelli Speed Shop, I cate 32 HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Busine List ata ases. en ates liquids with halogenated organic compounds and sto s m r vet,. Ie fuels ste. Based on the above listed business folio . g pot tial chemicals of concern were ide~tifi:::~~:o~ortola segment 0 the p~ · VOCs, · Hex Chrom, and · CAM 17. - - - 4.3.5. First ~ Jim Griffin & Son riti 10 ate at 72 El Camino Real, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List for st ge mot vehicle fuels or waste. Daland Body Shop Inc, cat at 890 EI Camino Real, is on the RCRA SaG, HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It is a generator of oxygenated solvents, solvent mixture and oil wastes. Greg Leonards Garage, located at 107 1 st Street, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List for generation of <27 gallons of waste per year. Stan the Roof Man, located at 103 1 st Street, is on the HIST UST, CORTESE, LUST and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It had a 550 gallon unleaded gasoline UST. The release was detected in 1992 and affected soils only. The case achieved closure in 2000_ A 1 Converter, located at 101 1 sl Street, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List as a generator and recycler of waste oil/solvents. - - - - -- 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 30 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k~ KLEINFELDER All Transmissions, located at 66 A Street, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List for storage of tires, storage of hazardous materials and as a generator and recycler of waste oil/solvents. Shantilal V. Patel, located at 770 EI Camino Real, is on the HIST UST database for 3 USTs of unknown capacity. Based on the above listed businesses the following poten 'al chemicals of concern were identified for the First segment of the project: 4.3.6. Westborough . TPHgdmo, · VOCs, . Hex Chrom, and · CAM 17. mino Real, is on the San Mateo Co. aterials. City South San Francisco, Engineering, located at 33 Arroyo Drive, is on the HAZNET database for disposal of empty containers. Grand Auto, located at 1103 EI Camino Real, is on the HAZNET and San Mateo Co. Business List databases for generation/disposal of organic waste, waste oil and solvents and for storage of hazardous materials. Paccar Automotive, Inc, located at 1103 EI Camino Real, is on the HAZNET database for disposal of organic residue and mixed solvent waste. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 31 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Kragens, located 10 Business List data ses. waste oil and solvents. Target No. 1054, located at 1150 EI Camino Real, is on the RCRA SaG and HAZNET databases for disposal of photochemicals/photoprocessing waste, asbestos- _ containing waste, laboratory waste and of-specification, aged or surplus inorganics. Redencion Joachico DMD, located at 1133 EI Camino Real, Suite 3, is on HAZNET _ database for disposal of photochemicals/photoprocessing waste and unspecified organic liquid mixture. Carriage Cleaners, located at 1121 EI Camino Real, i 0 he CLEANERS, HAZNET, and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. I IS ide . ied as a drycleaning and laundry service. It generates photochemicalsl. otoproc sing waste, waste oil and solvent, and liquids with halogenated organ' c un. California Water Service Co, located at Mateo Co. Business List databases. inactive 2,000-gallon gasoline U Field Office, located at 80 Chestnu gallon gasoline UST. on the HAZNET database for i on the CLEANERS, and San Mateo o r vehicle fuels or waste and generates a no eal, is on the HAZNET, and San Mateo Co. is th storage location for tires and generates & recycles - Southwood Chiropractic, located at 943 EI Camino Real, is on the HAZNET database for disposal of photochemicals/photoprocessing waste. Pacific Bell, located at 965 EI Camino Real, is on the RCRA SQG database. No further information was provided. South City Car Wash Inc, located at 988 EI Camino Real, is on the San Mateo Co. Business List for storage of hazardous materials and generation of <27 gallons of waste per year. Westborough Chevron, located at 1 Westborough Boulevard, is on the HIST UST, FID, HAZNET, RCRA SQG and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. The HIST 71420/PWENV1 /(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006. Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 32 of 54 July 24, 2006 kq KLEINFELDER UST record is for three 10,000 gallon and one 1,000 gallon UST. The FID record does not specify the number or capacity of active tanks. The Haznet record lists the business as a generator of an aqueous solution with organic residues. The RCRA SQG record does not specify type of waste generated. The San Mateo Co. Business List record is for tire storage, storage of motor vehicle fuels or waste, generation of <27 gallons of waste per year and the presence of a UST. Camino Real, is on the HAZNET, Chestnut Cleaners, located at 26 Chestnut Avenue, is on the CLEANERS, HAZNET, RCRA SQG and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. It is identified as a drycleaning and laundry service. It generates & recycles waste oil and solvent, and generates liquids with halogenated organic compounds. It also stores hazardous materials. 30 Chestnut Avenue is on the CHMIRS database for a 1996 release of 100 gallons of milk into the Calma Creek. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleintelder, Inc. Page 33 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k.q KLEINFELDER Auto Studio, located at 45 Chestnut Avenue, is on the HIST UST, FID, HAZNET, LUST, and San Mateo Co. Business List databases. The HIST UST database reports four USTs: 10,000 gallon unleaded, 10,000 gallon regular, 10,000 gallon premium and waste oil (capacity not reported). A gasoline release, which affected ground water other than drinking water, was detected in 1991. MTBE analysis was not performed. Case closure was obtained in 2003. The site reportedly has active USTs. - Acutec Autos, located at 45 Chestnut Avenue,' on t e HAZNET, LUST, and CORTESE databases. The LUST case affe d grou water other than drinking water. Further information on the case ot vid. The site generates aqueous waste with organic residues. - were identified for the W · TPHgdmo, · VOCs, · Hex Chrom, and · CAM 17. - Elizabeth Barthe, located at asbestos-containing waste. e HAZNET databases for I Ca ino Real, is on the RCRA SaG, L' ts. It is a generator of oxygenated ..., - - .... 4.3.7. Orphan List - Sites not plotted by EDR due to poor or inadequate address information are referred to as orphan sites. There are 178 unmapped sites in the EDR report. Because they have incomplete addresses, these properties are not practically reviewable as defined by the ASTM standard. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 34 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III. KlEINFElDER 4.4. OTHER RECORDS REVIEWED/AGENCIES CONTACTED The following additional sources of environmental records were reviewed during this Limited Phase I/Phase II. The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) makes public records available on the Geotracker database, accessible via the internet. Kleinfelder reviewed mapped information on the Geotracker database in order to identify additional sites of environmental concern not identified in the EDR report. No additional sites were identified using inf r tion from the Geotracker database. Data his information report was not 4.5. PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE(S) Table 4-2 presents information about the hysi I se . was obtained from published maps. A provided for Kleinfelder to review. OIL AND GAS FIELDS General Information The subject site is ranged in elevation located at an approximate elevation of 1 50 feet above mean sea level and sea level. The topographic relief shows localized variation, however the general gradient is toward the east. Land use in the vicinity of the site was depicted as developed. A map of oil and gas fields in South San Francisco was not included in the Mun er Ma book. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUAD RANG Information about the regional geology is presented on Table 4-3. This information was obtained from published data and maps, interviews with public agencies, and/or from previous investigations conducted by Kleinfelder in the vicinity of the site. 71420/PWENV1/{PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 35 of 54 July 24,2006 - k.1lfJ KLEINFELDER 4.6. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION Due to the size and scope of this project, information regarding environmental liens, usage limitations and title records are not practically reviewable. Additionally, as this project does not involve the purchase or sale of a piece of property, information regarding Value Reduction on the sale price is not available or relevant. As such, these items are not included in this Limited Phase I/Phase II report. - The client did not reveal to Kleinfelder any specialize reasonably ascertainable information. - - - - _. - 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 36 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k.q KLEINFELDER 5 HISTORY OF THE SITE The history of the site was researched to identify obvious uses. Historical land use was researched to the first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier or readily available. Table 5-1 summarizes the availability of information reviewed during this assessment. TABLE 5-1 HISTORICAL SOU SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Aen photographs were ailab from EDR of So 0, Connecticut Sanbo Fire Insurance Maps were available for portions of the site area from ERD of South port, Connecticut. City directories not were available from EDR of South ort, Connecticut. 1956, Historical maps were and available from EDR of South ort, Connecticut. Building permits were not reviewed. Previous Assessments were not available to Kleinfelder for review. CITY DIRECTORIES HISTORICAL REPORT 5.1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS A review of historical aerial photography may indicate past activities at a site that may not be documented by other means, or observed during a site visit. The effectiveness of this technique depends on the scale and quality of the photographs and the available coverage. Aerial photographs were obtained from several historical photograph collections through EDR. Aerial photographs covering 60 years were available during the frame that this report was being prepared. A tabulation of the aerial photographs reviewed is presented in Table 5-2. Copies of the reviewed aerial photographs are included in Appendix D. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 37 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k-.=J KlEINFELDER Source Quality Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Fair TABLE 5-2 HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS REVIEWED Date Type Approximate Scale 1 "=655' 1946 Black and White Monosco ic 1956 1"=655' 1965 1 "=555' 1977 1"=555' 1982 1"=690' 1993 1 "=666' 1998 - - - n on indications of land use and no stances or petroleum products can be - The site bounda' s features were not alw during the early years, because physical - 5.1.1. Hillside 1946: In this photograph, little development appears to be present in the vicinity of the southeastern portion of the section. A school and a residential development are present at the northwestern end of the section. It appears that the undeveloped area northeast of the section has been or is in the process of being graded at the time of the photograph. 1956: The northwest end of the section appears to be substantially the same as in the 1939 photograph. A stream that appeared in the 1946 photograph northwest of 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 38 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER the school appears to have been culverted. Commercial developments lie on both sides of the road in the southeast portion of the section. 1965: The section appears to be substantially the same as in the 1956 photograph, however it appears that grading has taken place north of the commercial development. 1993: The site appears to be subst nstructed north of the rs t be substantially the 1977: The section appears to be substantially the sam 1982: An additional residential neighborhood s commercial development. Otherwise sectl same as in the 1977 photograph. primarily residential in the western 1956: Additional residential area has been added in the northeastern portion of the section. The Bayshore Freeway has been constructed east of the section. The southern portion of the section appears to be substantially the same as in the 1946 photograph, with the exception of the freeway. 1965: New commercial properties appear to be under construction east of the freeway in this photograph. The remainder of the section appears to be substantially the same as in the 1956 photograph. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 39 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k"l KlEINFElDER 1977: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1965 photograph. 1982: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1977 photograph. - 1993: The section appears to be substantially similar in t is photograph as in the 1982 photograph. Commercial buildings east of the eew have been replaced and a bridge has been built to carry Grand Avenu traffic ver the railroad tracks. 1998: The section appears to be substantia 1993 photograph. - - 5.1.3. Victory 1946: In this photograph, the undeveloped. Victory of small structures that [ location of Victory Avenue. the area where Victory Avenue 1956: South - 1965: The small structures south of Victory Avenue have been removed and Victory Avenue has been extended to intersect Spruce Avenue. Industrial structures appear to have been constructed along the length of Victory Avenue. Empty lots are located at the southeast corners where Victory Avenue intersects Maple Avenue, Ryan Way and Spruce Avenue. The area west of Spruce Avenue remains undeveloped. 71420/PWENV1 /(PLE6R257 .doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 40 of 54 July 24, 2006 III. KLEINFELDER 1977: The empty lots where Victory intersects Ryan and Spruce have been occupied by additional industrial structures. Otherwise, the section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1965 photograph. 1982: The area west of Spruce Avenue has been developed with industrial/commercial properties. An empty lot remains at the southwest corner of Victory and Spruce Avenues. Otherwise, the section appears to be ubstantially the same in this photograph as in the 1977 photograph. 1993: Commercial/industrial structures have Spruce and Victory Avenues. Otherwi l th the same in this photograph as in th 198 e southwest corner of s to be substantially 1998: The section appears to be s 1993 photograph. What may be a residential neighborhood and a school to 1977: EI Camino Real, west of the section, has been widened. A new industrial structure has been constructed east of the section. Otherwise, the section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1965 photograph. 1982: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1977 photograph. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 41 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER 1993: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1982 photograph. 1998: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1993 photograph. 5.1.5. First 1946: In this photograph, the western portion of undeveloped, though construction m neighborhood. The eastern portion of adjacent to an agricultural field. t al fields in the eastern portion ction appears to be substantially the tially the same in this photograph as in the 1993: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1982 photograph. 1998: The section appears to be substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1993 photograph. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 42 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER 5.1.6. Westborough 1946: In this photograph, the section appears to be mostly undeveloped. The roads are unpaved and small structures are sparse in the area. EI Camino Real is paved. It appears that some grading has taken place in the area. Agricultural fields lie to the east of the section. 1956: The western portion of the section has be eveloped with residential neighborhoods, a school and paved roads. e ea rn portion of the section appears to be largely undeveloped, with t of a structure where the current shopping center is located. A s al the southern portion of the section has been diverted or c erte e same in this photograph as in the 1998: The section appears to e substantially the same in this photograph as in the 1993 photograph. 5.2. SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps provide historical land use information for some metropolitan areas and small-established towns. Kleinfelder requested a search of Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps by EDR. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were available for the subject site from 1910, 1925, 1950, 1953, 1956, and 1970 (see Appendix D). 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 43 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were not available for all sections for all the years listed above. 5.2.1. Hillside - The Hillside Avenue area developed initially as a residential area with a school. Sanborn maps from 1950, 1953 and 1956 show a garment and candy factory. The Sanborn map from 1970 shows the addition of a car w h, as station and a banking equipment manufacturer. Commercial and industr' I land ses were confined to the southeastern portion of the section. The northw tern orti of the section remained residential in each of the Sanborn maps revie d. 5.2.2. Airport s mainly undeveloped with a Iy rd in 1910. By 1925, the omotive repair facilities, a 1950 the section was fully In 1953, the Victory Ave e s tion was primarily occupied by industrial facilities including metal fabricating sl1 ps, machine shops and chemical facilities. A steam laundry facility and a spray painting facility was also present. Similar land uses were present and expanded on the 1970 Sanborn map. 5.2.4. Portola Portola Avenue has been residential since the street was constructed. Adjacent to it, an industrial bakery appears on the 1970 Sanborn map. 71420/PWENV1/( PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 44 of 54 July 24, 2006 It..q KLEINFELDER 5.2.5. First The First Street section has been primarily residential since 1925 according to the Sanborn map in this area. A fueling station was there at that time as well. The gas station was replaced by a construction company yard by 1950. An auto repair shop appeared in the section by 1956, and the land use in this section has remained largely unchanged since then. 5.4. pants by address_ Due to review of city directories was hase IIPhase II. 5.2.6. Westborough The Westborough Boulevard section has be section since it was constructed. A gas sta' n an appear on the 1956 Sanborn map. T 197c S additional residential neighborhoods. 5.3. CITY DIRECTORIES i~~ftI$1~Uf.lf't~1ii~;!Il.gfi~if.~~ ({I:~ !8' . rill" . e'z:~ ilI\\~ilfJis.!i-'mf! ~~~~.ial~g;~,~;~g;N~ 1899 San Mateo 15 minute 1:62,500 1947 San Mateo 15 minute 1:50,000 1956 San Francisco South 7.5 minute 1:24,000 1956 hotorevised for 1968 San Francisco South 7.5 minute 1:24,000 1956 hotorevised for 1973 San Francisco South 7.5 minute 1:24,000 1993 San Francisco South 7.5 minute 1:24,000 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 45 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER 5.4.1. Hillside The 1899 topographic map shows the Hillside Avenue section as an undeveloped canyon on San Bruno Mountain in 1899. By 1947, roads had been constructed in the Hillside section, but there is development is not marked on the 1947 map. The 1956, 1968 and 1973 maps show the area as developed (undifferentiated) with a school and three commercial buildings. The 1993 map shows the area as developed. 5.4.4. Portola 5.4.2. Airport The 1899 topographic map shows the Airport town. The area was served by the Souther acifi Boulevard (then the Bayshore Highway) ark area of South San Francisco. The section is how as 1968, 1973 and 1993 topographic - 5.4.3. Victory The 1899 and 1947 topographic maps show the Portola section as undeveloped. By 1953 and in the subsequent topographic maps, it is shown as densely developed. 5.4.5. First The 1988 topographic map shows the First Street section as undeveloped. The roads in the area are shown on the 1947 map, and the subsequent maps show the area as densely developed. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder. Inc. Page 46 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER 5.4.6. Westborough The Westborough section is shown as undeveloped land on the 1899 topographic map. Roads and a single structure are drawn on the 1947 map of the area. Subsequent maps show three schools and dense development in the section. 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 47 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER 6 SITE RECONNAISSANCE Kleinfelder's assessment activities included a site reconnaissance. This section summarizes the findings from the site reconnaissance. 6.1. METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Ms. Mehagan Hopkins and Mr. John William reconnaissance on July 17, 2006. The site 6.2. The project consists 0 pn arily along streets. The segments developed regions as specified in o hout each of the project segments. 'ty w er, city sewer, and natural gas lines through v . s businesses of concern located adjacent to f these businesses are discussed above in Section In addition to the businesses discussed Section 4.3, Kleinfelder also observed Peninsula Battery, located at 1139 Airport Boulevard, which appeared to potentially be a site of environmental concern. Kleinfelder observed overhead, street level and below grade electrical transformers at several locations throughout the project areas. One transformer was noted in the open area of the 1 st Street segment. Within the Airport project segment, Kleinfelder observed approximately eleven overhead and several street level and below grade transformers. The overhead transformers were along Cypress Avenue. Street level transformers were noted within the Victory segment. Transformers were not observed within the 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 48 of 54 July 24, 2006 k~ KLEINFELDER Portola and Hillside segments. Transformers are of concern as possible sources of PCB contamination, however, we were not able to discern whether any of the observed transformers may have released or leaked PCBs to the surroundings. Kleinfelder noted pooled water in the parking lot of Jack in the Box, located at the corner of Victory Avenue and Spruce Avenue within the Victory segment. The pooled water appeared to be the result of cleaning activities occ ring outside the structure, as evidenced by the presence of soap suds floating on th ate 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 49 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER 7 INTERVIEWS [TO BE COMPLETED] ~ 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 50 of 54 July 24, 2006 k~ KLEINFELDER 8 PHASE II ESA [TO BE COMPLETED] 8.1. DRILLING AND SAMPLING PROGRAM 8.1 .1. Field Preparation 8.1.2. Soil Boring Procedures 8.2. SAMPLE COLLECTION 8.2.1. Soil Samples 8.2.2. Groundwater Samples 8.3. 8.3.1. Analytical Results 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 51 of 54 July 24, 2006 - III KLEINFELDER 9 EV ALUA liON Kleinfelder performed this ESA of the subject site in general conformance with the _ scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-05, as modified for this project. The following sections describe Kleinfelder's findings and provide general background information about the site. Findings inclu ECs, historical RECs, and notation of de minimis quantities, as applicable to the ite. B iness environmental risk issues are discussed in Section 8.3, Deviations. I summa Kleinfelder's assessment revealed the following information about the sit 9.1.2. DEVIAT NS AND A ON An evaluation 0 bU~:iro m t risk associated with the parcel(s} was not included in Kleinfel ~~Of s rvices. The ESA does not incorporate non-scope considerations, such as sbestos- ntaining materials testing, radon, lead-based paint testing, lead in drinking w sting, wetlands, regulatory compliance, cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, and high voltage power lines. Other deviations are identified in Section 2.5 of this report. 9.1. PHASE I 9.1.1. BACKGROUND 9.1.3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We have performed a Limited Phase I/Phase II ESA modified from the scope of work required by ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-05 and in conformance with our Proposal Number 01204PROP (SJ06P035), dated March 9, 2006, for the six proposed sewer trunk locations in the City of South San Francisco, California. In summary, Kleinfelder's 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 52 of 54 July 24, 2006 k,q KLEINFELDER assessment revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with each of the six sewer segments. The chemicals of potential concern for each segment are: . Hillside - Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline, diesel and motor oil (gdmo); volatile organic carbons (VOCs); hexavalent chromium (Hex Chrom); Title 22 metals (CAM 17); semivolatile org ic carbons (SVOCs); and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); . Portola - TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chrom, a . Victory - TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chro , C . Westborough - TPHgdmo, VOCs, ex C . First - TPHgdmo, VOCs, Hex Chrom, . Airport - TPHgdmo, VOCs, 9.2. PHASE II 9.3. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the combined results of the Limited Phase I and Phase II, Kleinfelder recommends the following: [TO BE COMPLETED] 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 53 of 54 July 24, 2006 - k.~ KLEINFELDER 10 REFERENCES Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), June 5, 2006, EDR DataMap@ Corridor Study@, SSF Wet Weather Phase II, Inquiry Number: 01686767. California Division of Mines and Geology, San Francisco Sheet (1961). Geologic Atlas of California, Olaf P. Jenkins Edition. United States Geologic Survey (USGS), 15-Min Map, San Francisco South, California, dated 1 3 Additional sources may be referenced sep 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257.doc)/jmk Copyright 2006, Kleinlelder, Inc. Page 54 of 54 July 24, 2006 III KLEINFELDER - k.~ KLEINFELDER - k.~ KLEINFELDER STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS I declare that to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the stan rds and practices set forth in CFR Part 312. ional performing this environmental and is available on request. James A. Lehrman, PG, CHG, REA Environmental Group Manager 71420/PWENV1/(PLE6R257 .doc)/jm k Copyright 2006, Kleinfelder, Inc. March 31, 2006 - k~ KLEINFELDER BASE REPORT CD) - III KlEINFELDER - III KlEINFELDER - III KLEINFELDER CAL REPORTS - kq KLEIN FELDER - - - - OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL 2005-2006 (650) 829-6652 FAX: (650) 829-6689 JOSEPH A. FERN EKES, MAYOR RICHARD A. GARBARINO, VICE MAYOR MARK N. ADDIEGO, COUNCILMEMBER PEDRO GONZALEZ, COUNCILMEMBER KARYL MATSUMOTO, COUNCILMEMBER BARRY M. NAGEL, CITY MANAGER THE CITY ENGINEER September 20,2006 Mr. Thomas Zlatunich, Land Agent Pacific Gas & Electric Co. PO Box 15005 San Jose CA 95115 Re: Phase II Wet Weather Project CEQA Document City of South San Francisco Dear Mr. Zlatunich: In response to your letter of August 18,2006 regarding the above referenced project, the City of South San Francisco is fully aware of the natural gas and electrical facilities owned and operated in various portions of South San Francisco. All reasonable efforts are being made to contact PG & E during the design process to ensure that PG&E facilities are not impacted by this or other projects undertaken by the City, including facilities within Airport Boulevard. The City is also' aware of requirements for relocating PG &E facilities. The ~roposed Phase II Wet Weather project does not include the construction of any habitable structures that will require additional utility service by PG & E. Your comments regarding the obligations of PG & E to provide a safe and relIable energy supply to your service area is noted. I hope the above responses satisfy your concerns about this project. Exhibit B ADDRESS; 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SO\JfH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 MAILING; P.O. BOX 711, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94083 I~ Pacific Gas and Electric Company<1!J Corporate Real Estate land Services 111 Almaden Blvd., Rm. 814 San Jose, CA 95115 August 18, 2006 Mailing Address P. O. Box 15005 San Jose, CA 95115.0005 Ray Razavi, City Engineer Engineering Department City of South San Francisco P.O, Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report Phase II - Wet Weather Project RECEIVED AUG 2--1 2006 BY: ENGINEERING DMSION Mr. Razavi: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Phase II - Wet Weather Project in South San Francisco. PG&E owns and operates gas and electric distribution facilities which are adjacent to the proposed project To promote the safe and reliable maintenance and operation of utility facilities, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPDC) has mandated specific clearance requirements between utility facilities and surrounding objects or construction activities. To ensure compliance with these standards, project proponents should coordinate with PG&E early in the development of their proj~ct plans. Any proposed plans should provide for unrestricted utility access for the reliable maintenance and operation ofPG&E's facilities PG&E operates and maintains an electric underground transmission line and a gas transmission line in Airport Blvd. (Airport Subtrunk). Because transmission facilities relocation's require long lead times, and are not always feasible, developers should be encouraged to consult with PG&E as early in their planning stages as possible. . Relocations ofPG&E electric transmission and substation facilities (50,000 volts and above) could also require formal approval from the California Public Utilities Commission. If required, this approval process could take up to two years to complete. Proponents with development plans which could affect such electric transmission facilities should be referred to PG&E for additional information and assistance in the deyelopment of their project schedules. We would. also lil\e to .note that continued development consistent with your General PlanS will have a cumulative impact on PG&E's gas and efectnc systems and may require on-site and off-site - additions and improvements to the facilities which supply these services. Because utility facilities are operated as an integrated system, the presence of an existing gas or electric transmission or distribution facility does not necessarily mean the facility has capacity to connect new loads. We would like to recommend that environmental documents for proposed development projects include adequate evaluation of cumulative impacts to utility systems. This will assure the project's compliance with CEQA and reduce potential delays to the project schedule. PG&E remains committed to working with the City to provide timely, reliable and cost effective gas and electric service to South San Francisco. Please contact PG&E's Service Planning Supervisor, at 498.725.2095 if you have any questions regarding our comments. We would also appreciate being copied on future correspondence regarding this subject as this project develops. The California Constitution vests in the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) exclusive power and sole authority with respect to the regulation of privately owned or investor owned public utilities such as PG&E. This exclusive power extends to all aspects of the location, design, construction, maintenance and operation of public utility facilities. Nevertheless, the CPUC has provisions for regulated utilities to work closely with local governments and give due consideration to their concerns. PG&E must balance our commitment to provide due consideration to local concerns with our obligation to provide the public with a safe, reliable, cost-effective energy supply in compliance with the rules and tariffs of the CPUC. If you have any questions call me at 408.282.7106. Sincerely, ~J. UJ Thomas J. Zlatunich Land Agent cc: Service Planning Supervisor / PG&E Electric Transmission Supervisor / PG&E Gas Transmission Supervisor / PG&E u .. .""'" ,.Q .""", ~ ~ ~ tj S Q) ~ . -. lo-l o CO lo-l 0 ~ lo-l lo-l~ Q) CO ~ ~ ~ .~ Q)~ ~[ ~ Q) Q)~ ~~ joooooj ~ joooooj ~ Q) CO ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ u ~ .~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ lo-l 0 ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI':J . ~ ~ ~ .~ 'S~ o CI':J \C = = N ..., ~ N ~ QJ ,.Q e QJ .. ~ QJ 00. c o ..... .... ~ ~ !i: ..... J,., ~ > g ~ ...... 0 P-.",lj eJl 'Ero c "ta Q) .~ .C .S:!,E 8:0...... ..s=0~Q)~ ..... "t:l ..... 0 Jr 0 c ~ I-< I-< I-< O ..c 0 0.. "d 0.. ~ 'i:: ~ s:: 0.. ::aooP-..=lroro p ~ ..... ,..0 eJl= ;::J ..... c.c P-. ~ .C .r;j g 0 ~ ocCJ)u .Jj ~ ~ 15 '0] ~ orl.l;::Jgtio.. ::a~~~~O I-< eJlp-@ c ..... ro ~=Jj C.cs:: ..... 0 ~ rI.l U e c ~ 2 ti - .... Q) l:l.. rI.l'~ e ~ 0 """,~p':; Cl.I l-I = r.t.l ~ Cl.I ~ I: o .... ~ ~ CJ) .... ~ ~ Q) I-< s:: "d .~ 0 oS::,> ., .~ ro ~ ~ ~ ti ~ .. :::; "d 0 ;::J (/) 0 (/) "d ~ ro ...... I-< ...... 0 Q) I-< Q) ~ o..'c;; :: ~.~ ..... s:: (/) ro .... :;:::l (/) O';:j "-',..0 ;::J.'p~~"dro "d U Q) Q) .S 1;) bO::!.....I-<'>u ~ f:< (/) ro >> ...... .::l t1 ;::J s:: bO >< ~~"d0~.8 o 0 Q) ",lj.::l I ~U>U~s:: o ~...... ;::J ..... 0 ....... .::l :Ei, I-< "d s:: Q)"d t1s::..c: ..c: Q) ooj ~ Q) ..... t-< "d::: 0 .t:: ...... . ;::J 0 u 0 ~ ,-l 'U .b Q) Q) "d ~ ~ s:: .~ 1-<0 2 .::l 0 ...... ~Q)ui68~ ~::.8~"d.b ~"ta~~;a~ r:: {i .9 2 ~ ~ o (/) ...... ro ...... ro .... Q) ro '> ro ..c: ~ ;:; .~ ,> "d (/) b.O(/)~ .1""f ct1 U ..-.. ;;: Q) Q) ro ~ 8 ~ .S ""' ~ I-< ro (/) 0' Q) 1:i ~ s:: 1:: Lt) 15 '@ 0.. >. :a ...... 08 ~"g 0.';;.8 o~ "dg ~ >>ro 0.. Q) (/) .b -9 ~ (fj ro:;:::l "d s::..... I-<~ 1-<0.. ro 00.. ..0] 2Q)ujO.:x< 8 uo s::~ rol-<Q)>.~ s::...... ro..... ~ro.~ "d o:::=: (/) .b bO (fj '@ 1;) Q) ...... 0 d ::;a '"8 ::@ .S S "d '2 ~ 8 S o ro'>~''pQ)(fj g. Q)I-< (/) ~ 0 >> ro u .u 0 ;::J 1-<..... bO.... ,..0 >. 0.. ;::J 'I;: 0.. Q) :;:::l .S 2.. ~::o '.b.e >< s:: ~ ~ """V~ro"d<J:iI-<Q) 0 ~~ ;::J~<bl-<ro~Q)O (fj os:: ro~.......Q)Oo""'''''' "d I-<Q) ..c:I-<O~I-<U~(fj Q) 0> .(fj0......1-<(fj.....>>~ Q) (fj~ (fj.:x< (fj Q) o..(/) ro ,_ 0.. bOo.. Q)U"ta Q).......Q)(fj I-< V (/) ro .~ ;::J ............. >. ~ ro Q) .S U ,..0 0 iil.bli:l0:;:::lro~6..o04:1 "d:;(fj ...... ...... ...... ~ ro "d ro U ...... u....... s:: Q) >. ~ I""""l ro .r::; "'0 QJ ... 'S ~ ~ C'd J-l ro ro~81;)0..>bOa1}5(fjQ),...... .~~~ 0..Q) Q) ro Q) roo 0 U"d.~..c:""" ro"d 1;) > (fj Q) Q) 0.. 'U'x g S 0.. 19 Q) ro ;::J UO g:: ~ ~ 19 s:: 0 (fj ., 8 ~ 8 8 "d ......roCJ)ro(fj~""" ...... ~ ::a ::a- Q ~ U' Verification Monitoring Schedule Monitoring Responsibility Implementing Responsibility Mitigation Measure Page 2 of 6 Prior to start of construction South San Francisco Public Works Department South San Francisco Public Works Department Mitigation Measure 2. An Archeological Resources Program shall be prepared by a qualified archeologist prior to start of any construction that shall include: a) Provision for submittal of Section 106-level analyses for each project component as they are designed and submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board for State Revolving Loan funding. b) Language added on individual project improvement plans and specifications to the effect that if archeological materials or artifacts are identified, work on that portion of the project shall cease until a resource protection plan conforming to CEQA Section 15064.5 is prepared by a qualified archeologist and/ or paleontologist and approved by the South San Francisco City Engineer or an authorized representative. Project work may be resumed in compliance with such plan. If human remains are encountered, the County Coroner shall be contacted immediately and the provisions of State law carried out. Phase II Wet Weather Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of South San Francisco Verification Monitoring Schedule Monitoring Responsibility Implementing Responsibility Mitigation Measure Page 3 of 6 Prior to final Improvement Plan and Specifications approval South San Francisco Public Works Department South San Francisco Public Works Department Mitigation Measure 3. Contract specifications for this project shall require the preparation and implementation of an erosion control plan for all portions of the project that would involve trenching, excavation or stockpiling of dirt. The plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and be consistent with applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board guidelines and standards. Phase" Wet Weather Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Prograrn City of South San Francisco Verification Monitoring Schedule Monitoring Responsibility Implementing Responsibility Mitigation Measure Prior to commencement of construction South San Francisco Public Works Department South San Francisco Public Works Department Mitigation Measure 4. Prior to commencement of construction of each of the sub trunks, a Soil and Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be prepared to address potentially contaminated soil and/ or groundwater that may be encountered during construction activities. The SWMP shall be prepared by a state-certified environmental professional, and will include the following components: a) An identification of visual and odor indicators that may indicate the presence of contaminants. A soil sampling and analysis plan detailing protocols for collecting and analyzing appropriate soil samples during design development to determine if contaminated soil is present. A management plan detailing what specific steps will be taken if contaminated soil or groundwater is found, including additional testing, for removing and/ or isolating contaminated material, disposal site(s) for contaminated material, and a list of parties to be identified of the presence of contaminated material. As appropriate, the management plan implementation steps shall be included on construction plans and specifications. Worker education and safety plans shall be included in the SWMP. Necessary permits and approvals shall be obtained from appropriate regulatory agencies. b) c) d) e) Page 4 of 6 Phase" Wet Weather Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of South San Francisco Verification Monitoring Schedule Monitoring Responsibility Implementing Responsibility Mitigation Measure Prior to commencement of construction South San Francisco Public Works Department South San Francisco Public Works Department Mitigation Measure 5. The City shall undertake an advance notification program to property owners and residents that could be affected by the proposed construction program indicating, at a minimum, a description of proposed work, hours of operation, construction phasing and an individual to be notified in the event of emergencies. Page 5 of 6 During project construction in Orange Memorial Park South San Francisco Public Works Department Contractor Project Mitigation Measure 6. For portions of the project adjacent to residential portions of the project and within Orange Memorial Park, construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday-Saturday. No construction shall occur on Sunday or on local, State or federal holidays. Exceptions may be granted by the South San Francisco City Engineer in writing for a specific location. Construction activities shall be deemed to include vehicle warm-up and maintenance and delivery of construction materials. These limitations shall be included in all construction plans and specifications for the project. Phase II Wet Weather Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of South San Francisco Veriflcation Monitoring Schedule Monitoring Responsibility Implementing Responsibility Mitigation Measure Page 6 of 6 Prior to commencement of construction South San Francisco Public Works Department South San Francisco Public Works Department, Police Department and Fire Department Mitigation Measure 7. A Traffic Construction Management Plan shall be prepared prior to commencement of construction, identifying specific methods to be undertaken to ensure that peak hour traffic can flow freely and that access to abutting properties is maintained for emergency vehicles. This shall include vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle modes of transportation. The Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the South San Francisco Engineering Division, Police and Fire Departments. Phase" Wet Weather Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of South San Francisco REVISED EXHIBITS . Exhibit 3c, VICTORY SUBTRUNK . Exhibit 3d, WESTBOROUGH SUBTRUNK . Exhibit 3g, AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Linden to Lux . Exhibit 3h, AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Lux to North Canal Not to Beale SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 09-01-2006. Exhibit 3c CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE II MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION VICTORY SUBTRUNK oc&Ia t to Not Exhibit 3d WESTBOROUGHSUBTRUNK CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Not to scale /'--.... SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 09-01-2006. Exhibit 39 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE 1\ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Linden to Lux "" ~--~-"_.--"-_._--_.~.._~..,~._- SOURCE: City of South San Francisco, 09-01-2006. Exhibit 3h CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROJECT PHASE 1\ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIRPORT SUBTRUNK: Lux to North Canal - ~'t\\ s:1N' f?1 o n >< ~ ~ 3 ~41IF2#~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #5 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 27, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITIONS 84, lA, lB, lC, lD AND IE RECOMMENDA TION It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, adopt a resolution in support of State Propositions 84, lA, IB, I C, ID and IE, slated for the November 2006 ballot. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION Proposition 84 - The Clean Water. Parks and Coastal Protection Act This initiative allows the state to sell $5.4 billion in general obligation bonds for safe drinking water, water quality, and water supply; flood control; natural resource protection; and park improvements. The bond money would be available for expenditure by various state agencies and for loans and grants, primarily to local agencies and nonprofit organizations. In order to spend most of these bond funds, the measure requires the Legislature to appropriate them in the annual budget act or other legislation. Proposition IA: Transportation Fundine Protection This measure amends the State Constitution to further limit the conditions under which Proposition 42, the transfer of gasoline sales tax revenues for transportation uses, can be suspended. Specifically, the measure requires Proposition 42 suspensions to be treated as loans to the General Fund that must be repaid in full, including interest, within three years of suspension. Furthermore, the measure only allows suspension to occur twice in ten consecutive fiscal years. No suspension could occur unless prior suspensions (excluding those made prior to 2007-08) have been repaid in full. In addition, the measure lays out a new schedule to repay the Proposition 42 suspensions that occurred in 2003-04 and 2004-05. Specifically, the suspended amounts must be repaid and dedicated to transportation uses no later than June 30, 2016, at a specified minimum annual rate of repayment. Prop.IB: Hiehway Safety. Traffic Reduction. Air Quality and Port Securitv Bond Act This measure authorizes the state to sell about $20 billion of general obligation bonds to fund transportation projects to relieve congestion, improve the movement of goods, improve air quality, and enhance the safety and security of the transportation system. The bond money would be available for expenditure by various state agencies and for grants to local agencies and transit operators upon appropriation by the Legislature: Staff Report Subject Page 2 of 5 SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITIONS 84, lA, lB, lC, lD AND IE . Congestion Reduction, Highway and Local Road Improvements ($11.3 Billion) - For capital improvements to reduce congestion and increase capacity on state highways, local roads, and public transit for grants available to locally funded transportation projects, as well as for projects to rehabilitate state highways and local roads. . Public Transportation ($ 4 Billion) - To make capital improvements to local transit services and the state's intercity rail service. These improvements would include purchasing buses and railcars, as well as making safety enhancements to existing transit facilities. . Goods Movement and Air Quality ($3. 2 Billion) - For projects to improve the movement of goods- through the ports, on the state highway and rail systems, and between California and Mexico-and for projects to improve air quality by reducing emissions related to goods movement and replacing or retrofitting school buses. . Safety and Security ($1. 5 Billion)- For projects to increase protection against a security threat or improve disaster response capabilities on transit systems; as well as for grants to improve the safety of rail crossings to seismically retrofit local bridges, ramps, and overpasses; and to improve security and disaster planning in publicly owned ports, harbors, and ferry terminals. Prop IC: Housine and Emereency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006 This measure authorizes the state to sell $2.85 billion of general obligation bonds to fund 13 new and existing housing and development programs. The development programs, however, are new-with details to be established by the Legislature. The major allocations of the bond proceeds are as follows: . Development Programs ($1.35 Billion)- The measure would fund three new programs aimed at increasing development. Most of the funds would be targeted for development projects in existing urban areas and near public transportation. The programs would provide loans and grants for a wide variety of projects, such as parks, water, sewage, transportation, and housing. . Homeownership Programs ($625 Million)- A number of the programs funded by this measure would encourage homeownership for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. The funds would be used to provide downpayment assistance to homebuyers through low-interest loans or grants. Typically, eligibility for this assistance would be based on the household's income, the cost of the home being purchased, and whether it is the household's first home purchase. . Multifamily Housing Programs ($590 Million)- The measure also would fund programs aimed at the construction or renovation of rental housing projects, such as apartment buildings. These programs generally provide local governments, nonprofit organizations, and private developers with low-interest (3 percent) loans to fund part of the construction cost. In exchange, a project must reserve a portion of its units for low- income households for a period of 55 years. This measure gives funding priority to projects in already developed areas and near existing public services (such as first public transportation). Staff Report Subject Page 3 of 5 SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITIONS 84, lA, lB, lC, lD AND IE . Other Housing Programs ($285 Million)- These funds would be used to provide loans and grants to the developers of homeless shelters and housing for farmworkers. In addition, funds would be allocated to pilot projects aimed at reducing the costs of affordable housing. Prop ID: Kinderearten - University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006 This measure allows the state to sell $10.4 billion of general obligation bonds for K-12 school facilities ($7.3 billion) and higher education facilities ($3.1 billion) designated for seven types of projects as follows: Modernization ($3.3 Billion)- These monies would be for the modernization of existing school facilities. School districts would be required to pay 40 percent of project costs (unless they qualify for state hardship funding). New Construction ($1.9 Billion)- These monies would cover various costs associated with building new facilities, including site acquisition, project design, engineering, construction, and inspection. Up to $200 million of the $1.9 billion would be available to retrofit facilities likely to be unsafe during an earthquake. Districts would be required to pay 50 percent of new construction and earthquake-safety projects (unless they qualify for state hardship funding). Relief Grants for Overcrowded Schools ($1 Billion)- As a condition of receiving one of these grants, school districts would be required to replace portable classrooms with newly constructed permanent classrooms, remove portable classrooms from overcrowded school sites, and reduce the total number of portable classrooms within the district. As with other new construction projects, districts would be required to pay 50 percent of project costs. Under the program definition of overcrowded, roughly 1,800 schools (or 20 percent of all schools) would be eligible for funding. Career Technical Education Facilities ($500 Million)- The measure also funds a new facility program designed to enhance educational opportunities for students interested in technical careers. Grants would be provided to high schools and local agencies that have career technical programs. The grants would be allocated on a per square foot basis, with a maximum of $3 million for each new construction project and $1.5 million for each modernization project. For both types of grants, the required local contribution would be 50 percent of project costs. Given the program's requirements, approximately 500 school districts (or one- half of all districts) would be eligible for new construction and modernization grants. In addition, about 25 local agencies would be eligible for modernization grants. Charter School Facilities ($500 Million)- These monies would be for new construction and modernization of charter school facilities. (Charter schools are public schools that are exempt from certain state requirements in exchange for adhering to a local- or state-approved charter.) A 50 percent local contribution would be required. Staff Report Subject Page 4 of 5 SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITIONS 84, lA, lB, lC, lD AND IE Environment-Friendly Projects ($100 Million)- These monies would be provided as special incentive grants to promote certain types of environment- friendly facilities. For example, districts could receive grant funding if their facilities included designs and materials that promoted the efficient use of energy and water, the maximum use of natural lighting, the use of recycled materials, or the use of acoustics conducive to teaching and learning. The same local contributions would be required as for other new construction and modernization projects. Joint-Use Projects ($29 Million)- These monies would be available for both constructing new facilities and reconfiguring existing facilities for a joint-use purpose. Joint-use projects include gymnasiums, libraries, child care facilities, and teacher preparation facilities that are located at a school but used for joint school/community or K-12/higher education purposes. Under such arrangements, the school district and joint-use partner share the 50 percent local matching requirement. Higher Education Facilities($3.1 Billion) - These monies would be available to construct new buildings and related infrastructure, alter existing buildings, and purchase equipment for use in these buildings for the state higher education segments. Prop IE: Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006 This measure authorizes the state to sell about $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds for various flood management programs allocated as follows: . State Central Valley Flood Control System and Delta Levees ($3 Billion)- To evaluate, repair, and restore existing levees in the state's Central Valley flood control system; to improve or add facilities in order to increase flood protection for urban areas in the state's Central Valley flood control system; and to reduce the risk of levee failure in the Delta region through grants to local agencies and direct spending by the state. . Flood Control Subventions ($500 Million)- To provide funds to local governments for the state's share of costs for locally sponsored, federally authorized flood control projects outside the Central Valley system. . Storm water Flood Management ($300 Million)- For grants to local agencies outside of the Central Valley system for projects to manage stormwater. . Statewide Flood Protection Corridors and Bypasse ($290 Million)- To protect, create, and enhance flood protection corridors, including flood control bypasses and setback levees; as well as for floodplain mapping. Staff Report Subject Page 5 of 5 SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITIONS 84, lA, lB, lC, lD AND IE CONCLUSION Support for Propositions 84, lA, lB, 1 C, lD, and IE, a long-term blueprint to improve our highways, schools, housing and flood protection, would provide the necessary funds to provide needed infrastructure to California. BY:~~ Marty Van Duyn Assistant City Manager "1 APProVed~ ,~ . Nagel City Manager RR/rc Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO._ CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITIONS lA, lB, 1C, 1D, IE AND PROPOSITION 84 ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 BALLOT WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco is responsible for building and maintammg infrastructure that is essential to building and preserving the economic and social well-being of its residents and businesses of the City; and WHEREAS, these infrastructure include roadways, public transit systems, bike lanes, and other transportation systems; schools; affordable housing; drinking water and sewage treatment systems; parks and other amenities; and WHEREAS, the City has grown by 3,032 people over the past decade, and is projected to grow by an additional 4,260 people over the next 10 years, creating new pressures on the City to expand and improve our basic infrastructure as it relates to all of these infrastructure needs; and WHEREAS, the City currently is responsible for maintaining 141 miles of existing streets, and has adopted a capital improvement plan that estimates the cost of fulfilling this responsibility to be approximately $10,000,000 for 5 years; and as population in the City of South San Francisco increases, there is a growing need to expand investment in streets, transit systems, bike lanes, infill and transit- oriented housing, and other improvements to meet the needs of a growing city; and WHEREAS, the City estimates that it needs 1,777 units of new housing by 2015, estimated to cost $ 577,525,000; and WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed a $37.3 billion package of fiscal and bond measures to provide funding for housing, transportation, levee repairs and flood control projects and education facilities in May 2006; and WHEREAS, an additional bond measure to raise funds for clean water, parks and coastal protection has been placed on the ballot through the initiative process by a coalition of business, public health, local government and environmental organizations; and WHEREAS, these measures have been titled Propositions lA, lB, lC, ID, IE and 84 by the Secretary of State and will be placed on the November 2006 ballot for voter approval; and WHEREAS, Proposition 1A will close a loophole and ensure that gas tax revenue from Proposition 42, passed by voters in 2002, is only spent on transportation improvement projects, as originally intended; and the City's annual share of the Proposition 42 funds, to be used for repair and maintenance of existing streets, is estimated to be $ 1,000,000; and WHEREAS, Proposition lB will provide up to $20 billion on various transportation projects to rebuild California, of which $1 billion will go to cities and $1 billion to counties for local streets and roads improvement projects; and WHEREAS, Proposition lC will provide $2.85 billion for housing projects, including $1.35 billion that helps cities address housing-related infrastructure issues, consisting of $850 million in grants for development of public infrastructure projects that facilitate or support infill housing construction, $200 million for parks, and $300 million for development near public transportation; and WHEREAS, Proposition lD will improve California's weakening school system by providing $10.4 billion for performing school building repairs and providing innovative learning facilities for Californian students, including seismic retrofitting and classroom repairs; and WHEREAS, Proposition IE will provide $4.1 billion for critical river levee repair and construction, as well as flood control projects and the updating and repair of old water mains and sewage systems; and WHEREAS, Proposition 84 will provide $5.4 billion for improving natural resources and water programs including state projects and grants for flood control, safe drinking water, improving water quality, integrated water management, water planning, and sustainable communities; and WHEREAS, the League of California Cities is in strong support of Propositions lA - IE and 84, and views this pack,!ge of measures as being providing critically needed resources for California cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCn.. OF THE CITY OF South San Francisco, that the City hereby expresses its strong support for Propositions lA, lB, lC, ID, 1E and 84 which will be presented for voter approval on the November 2006 statewide ballot. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the City Manager (or clerk) is hereby directed to send a copy to the Executive Director of the League of California Cities. *. * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of , 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 'roclamatilln CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA GENENTECH,INC. 30TH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, Genentech, Inc. was founded on April 6, 1976, by venture capitalist Robert A. Swanson and sciellfist Herbert W Boyer, Ph.D.; and WHEREAS, Genentech is the wor/d'sfirst biotechnology companymldfor 30 yem-s has been a pioneer in the biotechnology industlY, harnessing the power of genetic engineering to change the face of medicine and address unmet medical needs; and WHEREAS, Genentech currently holds more than 6100 patentsworldlVide m7dhas more than 5400 patent applications pending; based on Genentech's scientific methods, multiple medicines have been brought to market and Genentech has developed a pipeline with more than 40 new products and indications; and WHEREAS, Genentech 's medicines hcnJe improved the lives of more than 5 million people living with cancer, asthma, psoriasis, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis and growth-related conditions, and more than $700 million worth of drugs have been provided to patients without insurance; and WHEREAS, to ensure scient(fic excellence, Genentech opened the world's largest research center devoted solely to biotechnology in South San Francisco in October 1992. completed its second mam!facturingfacility in VaccnJille, Cal(fornia in 1999, purchased a cell culture manufacturingfacility in Porriilo, Spain in April 2000, broke ground on the expansion of its South San Francisco research center in April 2001, began constmction f!f an expansion f!f its Vacaville facility in 2004, and acquired a mam!facturingfacility in Oceanside, California in 2005; and WHEREAS, in January 2006, FORTUNE magazine ranked Genentech # Ion its list of the "100 Best Companies to Work For" in America; and in 2005 Science magazine named Genentech "the top employer and most admired company in the biotechnology mId pharmaceutical industries, " Working Mother magazine named Genentech one of the "100 Best Companies for Working Mothers, '.' and ESSENCE magazine recognized Genentech as a top employer for women of color; and WHEREAS, Genentech is motivated by the desire to help patients and address Immet medical needs; focused on innovative science to develop breakthrough therapies; and committed to creating a work environment where employees enjoy coming to work every day. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council f!fthe City of South San Francisco hereby take great pleasure in commending Genentech on its 30th Anniversary mId urge residents of South San Francisco to embrace Genentech for its contributions, innovations and scientific excellence. Joseph A. Fernekes, Mayor Richard A. Garbarino, Vice Mayor Mark N Addiego, Councilmember Pedro Gonzalez, Councilmember Karyl Matsumoto, Councilmember Dated: September 15, 2006 AGENDA ITEM #6 - ~'t\\ S:M' if ~ . ~~ (0 n ~ ~I u c ~4~~ Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM#! September 27, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE 2005-2006 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (RUD) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council: I) Hold a public hearing on the 2005-2006 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and 2) Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all required documents for submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to submit a year-end Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The report describes the City's Housing and Community Development accomplishments during the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year and includes a financial summary of CDBG expenditures. Prior to submitting the report the City must give the public an opportunity to review the CAPER and give testimony at a public hearing. CAPER reports are due to HUD 90 days after the completion of the jurisdiction's fiscal year. In fiscal year 2005-2006, a total of$827,2l4 in CDBG funding was available for a broad range of community development activities. The CDBG program is the primary funding source for many services the City provides including housing rehabilitation, commercial fayade improvements, childcare, adult day care, emergency food assistance, homeless services, and tutoring. In April 2003, the City Council authorized the submittal of the City's Five-Year Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development for fiscal years 2003-2004 through 2007-2008. The Consolidated Plan identified the housing and non-housing priorities the City would address during 2003-2008. In April 2005 the City Council authorized the submittal of the One-Year Action Plan for 2005-2006. The 2005-2006 CAPER describes City's accomplishments and compares them to the goals set in the 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan. Attached, as Exhibit A, is a copy of the 2005-2006 CAPER. Staff Report Subject: Resolution Authorizing Submittal of the 2005-2006 CAPER to HUD Page 2 CONCLUSION The CAPER provides a comprehensive accounting of all CDBG funds allocated, expended, encumbered, or reprogrammed during the fiscal year. The CAPER has been available for public review in the Office of Economic and Community Development since September 11, 2006, when the public comment period began. Any comments received during the comment period or at the public hearing will be forwarded to HUD upon submittal of the report on September 30, 2006, the federally mandated deadline. Notice of the Public Hearing and availability of the CAPER for comment was published in the San Mateo Times on September 9, 2006. HUD guidelines require a resolution from the City Council authorizing submission of the 2005-2006 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). BY:~~ Marty VanDuyn Assistant City Manager APProVed~ \ ~L M. Nagel City Manager Attachment: Resolution 2005-2006 CAPER MVD:NF:SOS RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTTAL OF THE 2004- 05 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EV ALUA TION REPORT ("CAPER") TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") requires communities receiving Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds to submit a year-end Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report ("CAPER"); and WHEREAS, in fiscal year 2005-06, a total of$827 ,214 in CDBG funding was available for a broad range of community development activities; and WHEREAS, the CAPER has been available for public review in the office of Economic and Community Development, City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue since September 9th, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to submit the CAPER and execute all required documents for submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of September, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 861282vl City of South San Francisco Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report 2005-2006 September 2006 Prepared by Economic and Community Development Department - 1- City of South San Francisco Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report 2005-2006 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................... ......................... ............................................... i I. Introduction .......... ........... ........... ..... .................. ........... ........... ....... .... ... .................... .... ...1 II. Financial Resources ......................................................... ...............................................1 III. Housing Activities.........................................................................................................2 A. Priority: Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for very low-, low- and moderate-income individuals and families. ............................................2 B. Priority: Provide service-enriched shelter and transitional housing for homeless individuals and families. .......... ... ........ ...... ........... ......... ............. ...... ..... .............. ...... ....... 9 C. Priority: Provide service-enriched housing opportunities for individuals and families with special needs including, but not limited to, seniors, people with physical and developmental disabilities, domestic violence survivors, people with AIDS/HIV, and people in treatment for substance abuse. .......................................................................11 IV. Non-Housing Community Development Activities ....................................................12 A. Priority: Provide core public services activities to improve the quality of life for low-income individuals and families, including those at risk of becoming homeless and special needs groups. .................................................................................................... .13 B. Priority: Sustain and increase the level of business and economic activity in areas that serve or have a high percentage oflow-income residents. .....................................17 C. Priority: Preserve and improve public facilities that serve a high percentage of low- income residents. .................. ........................................................................................ .18 V. Lead-Based Paint Abatement Program......................................... ................................19 VI. Fair Housing Plan ....... ..... .... ..... ...... .......... ............... .... .... ..... '.' ....... ..... ............. ..... ......20 VII. Needs of Public Housing........ .............. '" ............. .... ................ ... ..... ..... ............ .........22 VIII. Anti-Poverty Strategy.... .......... ..... ............. ......... ............................................. ..... ....22 IX. Other Actions.................................. ........................................................................... .23 A. Address Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs & Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing...................................................................................................... .23 B. Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing/Governmental Constraints .......................24 C. Develop an Institutional Structure & Improve and Enhance Coordination of Services......................................................................................................................... .24 D. Certificates of Consistency....... .................... ....... ...... ........ ...... .............. ...... ...... .......25 X. Monitoring Standards and Procedures ......... ....... .... ........ ............. ............... ... .... ....25 XI. Citizen Participation .... ............ ......... ......... ..................... ................. ..... ....... ...... ....... ...26 -2- XII. Citizen Comments......................................................................................... ............ .27 XIII. Leveraging................................................................................................................2 7 XIV. Displacement............................................................................................................2 7 XV. Conclusion and Self-Evaluation.. ..... ................ ........ .......... ....... .................. ............. .27 Tables.................................................................................................................................. .1 Summary of 2005-2006 Accomplishments, Table 1.......................................................1 Summary of Housing Accomplishments, Table 2...........................................................1 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ ..1 Funding Allocations for 2005-2006............ ............. ...... ... ........................ .................... ...1 Financial Summary..................................................... .......................................... ...........1 ID IS PR03 Report.............................. ............................................................................ ..1 ill IS PR023 Report....................................................................................................... ...1 IDIS PR06 Report...................... ................. ..... .............. ...... .... ... .... .................................1 City Council Resolution ......... .... ... ........ .......... .............. ................. .................................1 - 3- City of South San Francisco Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report 2005-2006 Executive Summary The 2005-2006 CAPER describes how the City of South San Francisco addressed the City's housing and non-housing community development needs during the 2005-2006 fiscal year. In April 2003, the City of South San Francisco adopted a Five Year Consolidated Plan for housing and non-housing community development activities for 2003-2008. The Consolidated Plan identifies the community's needs in housing, neighborhood improvements, social services, and economic development. It also sets priorities for addressing those needs and describes how the City will use Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, and local funds to address those needs. This document, the 2005-06 CAPER, is consistent with the priorities established in the 2003- 2008 Five Year Consolidated Plan. The CAPER is organized by activity type and includes several sections including housing activities, non-housing community development activities, anti-poverty strategy, lead- based paint abatement, fair housing, coordination of public services, removal of affordable housing barriers, monitoring standards and procedures, and citizen participation. Much of the CAPER, however, focuses on describing the housing and non- housing community development activities the City carried out in 2005-2006. For an overview of the types of programs and activities that the City undertakes to address the City's housing and non-housing priorities see Table 1, which summarizes specific activities undertaken in 2005-2006. Housing Activities The City worked to increase and improve the supply of affordable housing through new construction and the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing housing. The City also funded a variety of programs that provide housing for special needs groups including homeless persons, domestic violence survivors, seniors, and persons with disabilities. For homeowners, the City had several housing rehabilitation programs available. Through these programs the City served 36 low-income households. The City offered low-interest loans and grant vouchers to low-income homeowners for housing repairs. House Helpers, a minor home repair program, performed free repairs for very-low income homeowners. The City also funded major repairs of six South San Francisco homes oflow-income homeowners through the Rebuilding Together Peninsula program. 2005-2006 CAPER City a/South San Francisco Page i -4- Potential homebuyers were supported through the City's first-time homebuyer program, which continued to show success, providing loans for 2 families in 2005-06. Additionally, the City anticipates that with the completion of the City Lights (formerly known as Marbella) Development many additional loans will be distributed in the next two fiscal years. The City continues to work with Habitat for Humanity to construct four three-bedroom ownership units affordable to low-income families. For renters, the City worked with private rental property owners and non-profit organizations to identify suitable rental properties that can be acquired and/or rehabilitated to provide housing for very low-income renters. The City continues to focus on Willow Gardens, an important acquisition and rehabilitation project. Also, the City purchased 714 Linden Ave, a 3-unit building occupied by low-income residents. To create new affordable rental units, the City worked with San Mateo County and completed the entitlement process to develop 43 units of affordable family apartments at Grand and Oak. Avenues, adjacent to the County Courthouse on County owned vacant land. Construction started in October 2005. The City addresses the housing requirements of residents with special needs through a variety of programs. For homeless people, the City adopted a continuum of care approach to assist families and individuals to break. the cycle ofhomelessness. The City funded an array of non-profit agencies that provide housing and services to families at-risk of becoming homeless. By providing support services, transitional housing, and permanent housing, City-funded non-profit agencies are able to help residents find permanent housing and avoid episodes of homelessness. The City also sought to address the needs of chronically homeless individuals. Through active participation in the County of San Mateo's HOPE (Housing our People Effectively) Initiative the City is working to combat the problem. This year, with City funding, 14 homeless families and 116 individuals were assisted. Elderly and disabled residents require special programs and services that enable them to remain in their homes in a safe and accessible environment. The City funds the Center for Independence of the Disabled (CID), which provides modifications to eliminate architectural barriers in their homes. crD assisted 26 households this year. Non-Housing Community Development Activities To help create a vibrant community, the City of South San Francisco uses the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to fund a variety of non- housing community development activities. These include public services to low-income residents and programs to improve commercial areas, public and community buildings, and low-income neighborhood amenities such as parks and community centers. Using CDBG, the City funds non-profit agencies that provide essential community services to low-income residents. Funded services included childcare, senior services, general social services, battered women's services, disabled services, and youth services. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page ii - 5- The City also used CDBG funds for economic development in the Downtown area. The Commercial Fayade Improvement Program provides financial and technical assistance to property owners undertaking structural and fayade improvements to their buildings. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings, and improve the appearance of the downtown. Staff provided technical assistance to eleven businesses. Grants were provided to an additional eight businesses. CDBG funds provided ADA playground equipment at Gardiner Park and bathroom modifications at the Grand Avenue Library. CORA Support Services also received a grant to renovate their shelter for survivors of domestic violence. These improvements removed barriers and increased access to services for the citizens of South San Francisco. Other Activities The City has a multifaceted approach to reducing the number of families living in poverty. First, the City participates in the construction and rehabilitation of housing that restricts rents to levels affordable to low-income residents. This helps reduce the number of families living in poverty by decreasing one of their largest expenses, rent, to a reasonable level. Second, commercial renovations help increase the number of pedestrian visits to the downtown. This in turn creates more spending and more job opportunities for low-income residents. Third, the City funds several nonprofit agencies whose services help low-income residents with childcare, literacy and other services. And fmally the City contributes CBDG funding to homeless shelters that include supportive services that help homeless people transition into employment and housing. The City works with other jurisdictions in San Mateo County to address lead-based paint hazards. Some of these collaborative lead-based paint abatement activities included: making training classes available to city staff and contractors, maintaining a list of certified contractors and maintenance workers, and outreach concerning lead-based paint hazards. The City continues to work to overcome housing discrimination by contracting with two agencies, Project Sentinel and La Raza Centro Legal, to assist residents with housing-discrimination complaints. The two agencies provide counseling and advocacy in the areas of fair housing and housing habitability. To coordinate the delivery of services to residents, the City worked closely with non- profit social service providers, other cities, the School District, the County, and the Chamber of Commerce. Efforts include housing rehabilitation and development, lead paint abatement, downtown beautification, code enforcement, ending chronic homelessness and services for low-income residents. Additionally, the City actively participates in the San Mateo County HOME Consortium, the County's Continuum of Care Collaborative and the HOPE (Housing Our People Effectively) Committee. Finally, the City monitored its public policies to identify areas where it can make improvements. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page iii -6- City of South San Francisco Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report 2005-2006 I. Introduction The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to submit a year-end Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The CAPER describes the City's housing and community development accomplishments during the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year (July 1,2005 to June 30, 2006). In the CAPER, the City's accomplishments are compared to the goals established in the 2005-2006 One-Year Action Plan and the 2003-2008 Consolidated Plan. The report also includes a fmancial summary of the City's use of community development funds. For the City of South San Francisco, the CAPER consists of a Narrative Report, a Financial Summary Report and an IDIS Report for Citizen Review. The Narrative Report discusses the City's housing activities, non-housing community development activities, and other activities to improve the community. Each activity and program listed in the Narrative Report describes the City's accomplishments, the program's geographic area, and the financial resources utilized. The Financial Summary Report provides a cumulative summary of all CDBG program expenditures. The IDIS Report for Citizen Review gives the number of clients served, the demographics of the clients served, and financial data for each CDBG funded program. During fiscal year 2005-2006, the third year of the 2003-2008 Consolidated Plan, the City's priorities were to increase the supply of decent affordable housing, rehabilitate housing and commercial buildings, and assist non-profit agencies with the delivery of public services to low-income residents to create a suitable living environment. The City succeeded in meeting or exceeding the majority of the goals set in the One-Year Action Plan, as well as advancing the goals listed in the Five- Year Consolidated Plan. In undertaking these activities and in using federal funds, the City of South San Francisco did not in any way hinder implementation of its Plan by action or willful inaction. Attached to this report is a comprehensive summary of the City's accomplishments during 2005-2006 and how these accomplishments relate to the five-year Consolidated Plan (see Table 1). Table 2 is a summary of the City's housing accomplishments. Appendix A is the financial report generated by IDIS that the City submits to HUD. II. Financial Resources Funding to carry out the activities described in the CAPER came from several sources including the federally funded CDBG and HOME programs. The City also used local 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page I of28 -7- Redevelopment Agency public funds and other private resources to carry out the Plan's activities. Each activity listed in the CAPER reports its funding sources. The federal government provides CDBG funds to cities directly via annual grants. Cities can utilize these funds to revitalize low-income neighborhoods, expand affordable housing, create economic opportunities for low-income people, and improve community facilities. During the 2005-2006 fiscal year the City of South San Francisco received a CDBG grant of$686,877. Additionally, the City has received $140,337 in program income from rehabilitation and first-time homebuyer loan repayments, giving the City a total of $827,214. The federal government provides HOME funds to cities and counties to improve and increase the supply of affordable housing for low-income people. To access HOME funds, the City of South San Francisco is part of the San Mateo County HOME Consortium. The HOME program requires jurisdictions using HOME funds to leverage these funds with local resources, The City uses Redevelopment Agency funds to meet the HOME match requirement. For 2005-2006, the County provided South San Francisco with $18,000 in HOME administration funds, which was used to fund fair housing activities. Non-federal public resources available to the City primarily come from the City's Redevelopment Agency (RDA). RDA funds are generated through incremental property taxes in the City's redevelopment areas. The City uses 20 percent of the tax increment on housing activities that benefit persons at or below 120 percent of the median income. In 2005-06 the City used $70,300 in Redevelopment Agency funds to specifically address the priorities listed in this report. Nonprofit agencies and private investors participated in many of the activities described in the One- Year Action plan. In many cases their participation leveraged both federal and local public funds used to carry out these activities. Private leveraging is discussed further in this plan where appropriate. ill. Housing Activities A. Priority: Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for very low-, low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The San Mateo County Consortium has determined that creating new affordable rental units is a high priority in San Mateo County. The Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG) estimates that new housing construction will not be affordable to very low-, low- and moderate-income households. To help meet the demand for new affordable housing, public and nonprofit agencies have increased their efforts to make affordable housing available. The most suitable location for affordable multi-family housing is generally urban areas near transportation and services, and in cities' redevelopment areas. In South San 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 2 of28 - 8- Francisco, the City is focusing affordable housing efforts along the new Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) light rail line and the EI Camino Real corridor. The high cost of developing housing and the subsidies needed to make new units affordable to low- and moderate-income families makes the construction of new affordable units difficult. In addition, there is a limited amount of land suitable for affordable housing development in South San Francisco. These and other factors outlined in the San Mateo County and the South San Francisco Consolidated Plan provide the basic rationale for South San Francisco also making housing rehabilitation a priority. I. New Housing Construction a. County Property at Grand and Oak Avenues In FY 03-04 the City negotiated an agreement with the County of San Mateo and BRIDGE Housing Corporation to develop a 43-unit affordable family housing development. This FY, 2005-06, BRIDGE Housing and the County fmalized the land grant agreement and the BRIDGE completed the entitlement process. Construction began in 2005-06. The units will be affordable to low- and moderate-income families and funded with Tax Credits and $3,500,000 in RDA Funds. The project is budgeted to cost a total of$13,415,000. The outcome of this project will be increased affordability by creating new decent affordable rental housing. b. 440 Commercial Avenue In FY 02-03 the City's Redevelopment Agency purchased an empty lot at 440 Commercial Avenue for the purpose of constructing affordable housing. The City negotiated an agreement with Peninsula Habitat for Humanity to construct four three- bedroom units affordable to families earning below 50% AMI. The planning and entitlement process was completed in 2004-05. The Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) was approved in FY2005-06 and it is estimated that the units will be completed in FY 2007-08. Habitat obtained additional HOME funds from the County of San Mateo. The Agency has contributed the land and $33,000. Habitat will provide materials and volunteer labor to construct the units. Habitat will also provide Mortgage Financing for the acquisition by low-income families who are also required to volunteer 500 hours of labor as sweat equity. During 2005-2006 Habitat for Humanity experienced significant staff turnover, which delayed the project. They have now hired a new Project Manager. Construction will begin in Fall 2006. The outcome of this project will be increased affordability by creating new decent affordable housing for ownership. d. Inclusionarv Housing Development-Below Market Rate (BMR) Units Under the City's 20% Inc1usionary Housing Ordinance various developers make new affordable units in market rate projects available to residents at or below 80% of the area median income and residents at or below 120% of the area median income (AMI). Projects will be either rental or ownership units depending on the type of project under development. No public funds are used to develop BMR units because the private developers pay for the entire development. The outcome of this project is increased affordability of new decent housing. This year the City negotiated two Affordable Housing Agreements: 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 3 of28 - 9- . 90 Oak Ave-three affordable condominium units. One unit will be available to people between 50-60%AMI, one unit will be available to people between 80-90% AMI and one unit will be available to people at or below 120% AMI. SummerHill Homes-20 affordable condominium units. 2 units will be available to people between 50-60% AMI, 4 units will be available to people between 60-70% AMI, 2 units will be available to people between 70-80% AMI, 4 units will be available to people between 80-90% AMI, 3 units will be available to people between 90-100% AMI and 5 units will be available to people between 100-1 OO%AMI. . The following project was completed in FY 2005-2006 · Construction of a new apartment building located at the site of the former Escape Hotel (SRO) was completed and the building is fully leased. The new building consists of 8 one-bedroom units, 6 of which are affordable-2 units affordable to people at or below 50% AMI, 1 unit affordable to people at or below 60% AMI and 3 units affordable to people at or below 80% AMI. The following projects are stilI under construction. The sale/lease-up of these buildings should happen in FY 2006-07: · Fairfield Residential Project-29 units affordable to people at or below 80% AMI and 43 affordable to people at or below 120% AMI. · South City Lights (formerly known as Marbella)-28 units affordable to people at or below 80% AMI and 42 affordable to people at or below 120% AMI The outcome of this program is increased affordability of new decent affordable housing. 2. First-Time Homebuyer Loan Program The City of South San Francisco has operated a frrst-time homebuyer loan program for three years. The City's First-Time Homebuyer program provides low-interest "silent second loans" in which the City defers payments for five years. Loans range between $25,000 and $100,000 depending on need and income eligibility. First-time homebuyers are able to use the City loans to purchase homes anywhere in the City or newly constructed BMR units created under the City's BMR ordinance. The program also offers first-time home buyer seminars and individual counseling for prospective buyers. This program provides increased affordability to new decent housing. In 2003-2004, the program was originally funded by $100,000 in CnBG and leveraged by $155,000 in RDA funds and $25,000 in Housing Trust Funds. The City assisted 2 families in purchasing homes in FY 2005-2006. Both of the households were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the families was Asian-1 and White-I. A female headed 1 of the households. First Home, Inc., the City's program administrator conducted 3 first-time homebuyer seminars for South San Francisco residents to help families learn about the home buying process. The City used $100,000 in CDBG funds and $100,000 in RDA funds to assist both families. 2005-2006 CAPER City a/South San Francisco Page 4 0/28 -10- The City anticipates funding additional loans over the next two fiscal years as the South City Lights Development (formerly known as Marbella) is completed. For this purpose, the City has set aside $200,000 in CDBG funding and $1,000,000 in RDA funds and will continue to support the program to meet the anticipated demand. 3. Acquisition and Rehabilitation The City works with private rental property owners and non-profit organizations to identify suitable rental properties that can be acquired and/or rehabilitated to provide housing for low- and very low-income renters. The types ofrental properties targeted consist of 4 to 12 unit structures and/or residential hotels. The primary funding sources for rental properties are HOME, CDBG, and RDA funds. One multi-year project currently underway is Willow Gardens. a. Willow Gardens The City has a long-term partnership with Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition to acquire and rehabilitate approximately twelve four-plex units (48 units total) in the Willow Gardens neighborhood. The City plans to convert these units into permanent affordable rental units that will be owned and managed by Mid-Peninsula. The units will be affordable to households at or below 50 - 60% of median income. To date, the City and Mid-Peninsula have acquired nine buildings (36 units) and will continue to acquire them as they become available. The City and Mid-Peninsula Housing also completed the interior and exterior rehabilitation of the 28 units owned prior to 2005- 2006. During 2005-2006 the City and Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition purchased two new buildings. One of the buildings located at 364 Susie Way was purchased from a developer who had rehabilitated the building as part of his indusionary housing obligation. The second building was located at 383 Susie Way. The buildings were purchased with $1,050,000 in RDA funds and private funding from Mid-Peninsula. In FY 1997-98, the Redevelopment Agency authorized a $15.75 million budget for the acquisition and rehabilitation of Willow Gardens units and for infrastructure improvements in the neighborhood. The project is funded by a $3.5 million Redevelopment Agency loan, a $3.1 million Redevelopment Agency Public Purpose Bond, $1 million in HOME funds and $2 million in tax credits. The outcome of this project is the sustainability of decent affordable housing. b. Downtown Affordable Housing Program The Downtown Affordable Housing Program is designed to provide affordable rental housing for low- and very-low income residents through the acquisition and rehabilitation of dilapidated housing stock in or near the downtown. Of special interest are unoccupied Single Room Occupancy hotels and 4-6 unit apartment buildings. The City conducts feasibility analyses on a regular basis to determine viability of acquisitions. Should an opportunity to create affordable units present itself, the City will immediately allocate funds to the project from RDA, HOME or 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 5 of28 - 11- CDBG. The outcome of this program is increased sustainability to maintain decent affordable housing. 1. 310-312 Miller Avenue In 04-05 the City purchased a three-unit property at 310 Miller Ave, spending $595,819.37 in RDA funds. Rehabilitation of the property was completed June 2006. No tenants were displaced and renovation began as units became vacant. The units located behind 312 Miller Ave, purchased the previous fiscal year, were also rehabilitated in June 2006. The vacant units were advertised in the local paper and through the Core Social Service agency. The City spent $114,808 in CDBG funds for rehabilitation work at 310-312 Miller Avenue in 2005-2006. The racial ethnic make-up of the residents at the end of the fiscal year was HispanicfWhite-12. All were at or below 30% AMI. One was headed by a female head of household and one was headed by an elderly individual. 11. 714 Linden Avenue Additionally, in 2005-2006 the City purchased 714 Linden Ave, a 3-unit building occupied by low- and very-low income residents. The building was purchased with $862,000 in RDA funds. The ethnic make-up of the three current families is Hispanic-3 and all are at or below 30% of AMI. iii. The West and Edwin Hotels Staff negotiated with the owners to the West and Edwin Hotels, two unoccupied SROs in the Dmvntown area that have been vacant since the 1970s, to begin rehabilitation of the Hotels and convert them into I-bedroom affordable apartments. The City secured $200,000 in HOME funds for the project and will lend the owners RDA funds to cover the complete rehabilitation. iv. Linden Ave The City made an offer to purchase 9-units on three adjacent lots. The owner was still considering tlwoffer at the close of the fiscal year. This acquisition will be funded through RDA funds. This acquisition will help to preserve the affordable housing stock in our Downtown. 4. Low-Income Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation a. City-Sponsored Housing Rehabilitation The City provides housing rehabilitation opportunities to low-income & moderate- income homeowners through low-interest loans, small grants in the form of vouchers and a minor home repair program administered by North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC). The outcome of this program is sustainability to maintain decent affordable housing. i. City-sponsored Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program The Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program assists low- and moderate-income homeowners with housing repairs. The program is administered by the City's 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 60/28 -12- Housing and Community Development Division and is available in the Downtown/Old Town area and citywide. These funds are targeted for administration of the Rehab Program, actual loans, or acquisition funds as needed, based on opportunities that arise. The outcome of this program is the sustainability of decent affordable housing. The City also funds the Voucher Programs and the House Helpers Program through this CDBG activity. Although in 2005-06, the City continued to emphasize new affordable housing development, one owner-occupied home-rehabilitation project was completed spending $25,000 in CDBG funds. This project included a roof replacement, correction of an illegal addition and repairing a dangerous chimney. Three additional applications were processed, reviewed and approved. The homeowners withdrew from the program of their own accord. The racial ethnic make-up of the households were: White-2 and Asian-2. Two (2) homes were headed by a female and 2 were headed by a senior. The family that received the loan was below 50%AMI. ii. Voucher Program The City administers a housing rehabilitation voucher program that makes grants available to low-income homeowners in the Downtown/Old Town area and citywide. The Voucher program is a grant sub-program of the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program and is not funded separately. Vouchers are used in limited situations and for limited amounts of money when the usual loan process is prohibitively expensive or too time consuming to clear up an emergency situation. The City has two different types of Vouchers available: Emergency Code Violation Vouchers and Debris Box Vouchers. The City spent $5,470.28 in CDBG funds. The outcome of this program is the sustainability of decent affordable housing. Emergency Code Violation Vouchers provide homeowners a grant of up to $2,500 to clear up code violations in their homes. The City provided one voucher to replace a furnace in a mobile home. The racial ethnic makeup of the resident was: White-I, elderly, disabled and female-head of household. . Debris Box Vouchers help low- and moderate-income residents in the Downtown/Old Town area and citywide remove accumulated debris and yard waste from their properties. The City issued 2 vouchers to 2 households in 2005-2006. The racial ethnic make up of the households were: White-2. One (1) family was female head of household and two (2) families had an elderly head of household. iii. Minor Home Repair (House Helpers) The Minor Home Repair Program provides home repairs for very low-income homeowners free of charge. Services include roof and gutter repairs, water heater replacement, plumbing leaks, minor electrical repairs and installation of security devices, smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors. The program is a city- sponsored program administered by North Peninsula Neighborhood Services 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 70f28 -13- Center (NPNSC), whose staff speak English, Spanish and Tagalog. The majority of households assisted are large families with small children and elderly female heads-of-household. The outcome of this program is the sustainability of decent affordable housing. NPNSC served 32 households in 2005-2006. The total amount ofCDBG funds expended by this program was $55,000. Fourteen (14) of the households served were at or below 30% AMI, 14 were at or below 50% AMI and 4 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make up of the families was White-13, Asian-5, African American/Black-4, Hispanic/African American/Black-I, Hispanic/White- 2 and Hispanic/Other- 7. Females headed 16 of the households, 26 households were headed by an elderly person and a disabled person headed 12 of the households. c. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (RTP) In 2005-2006 RTP rehabilitated 6 South San Francisco homes. The City allocated $8,500 in CDBG funds that were used exclusively for building materials. RTP leverages the funds through volunteer labor, in-kind donations of materials and skilled labor and corporate sponsorship. Work completed on these homes included roof replacement and repairs, water heater replacement, exterior and interior painting, landscaping, fence replacement, flooring installation, debris removal and minor plumbing and electrical. The majority of the work is completed on the last Saturday in April. Six (6) households were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make up of these households wasWhite-5 and Hispanic-I. Females headed 6 households, 4 households were headed by an elderly person and a disabled person headed up 5 of the households. The outcome of this program is the sustainability of decent affordable housing. 5. Rental Housing Habitability An important aspect of affordable housing is monitoring the condition and habitability of existing rental housing. La Raza Central Legal Code Enforcement Assistance Program, funded with $5,000 in RDA funds, worked closely with tenants to report and monitor housing code violations, thus improving habitability and reducing landlord abuse. La Raza provided counseling regarding habitability and code enforcement issues to 87 individuals. Seventy-seven (77) individuals were at or below 30% AMI and 10 were at or below 50%AML The racial and ethnic make up of these individuals was White-II, Asian-4, American Indian/Alaskan Native-3 and Hispanic-69. Females headed 11 households, 1 household was headed by an elderly person and a disabled person headed up 2 of the households. The outcome of this program was to provide increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five-Year Plan Goals The City made good progress in meeting the priority to increase, maintain and improve the supply of decent affordable housing for very low-, low- and moderate-income individuals and families. Accomplislunents included beginning construction on the Bridge Housing development of 43 affordable apartments and fmalizing all paperwork for the construction by Habitat for Humanity of 4 ownership units. The City's Inc1usionary Housing Ordinance has significantly increased the supply ofBMR units in 2005-2006 CAPER City a/South San Francisco Page 8 0/28 -14- the City. The total number ofBMR units completed, under construction and negotiated since the start of the Five Year Consolidated plan is 184. Eleven units were added to the City's inventory of affordable housing through the Acquisition and Rehabilitation program and partnership with Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition. In the third year of the Consolidated Plan, the City has either completed or commenced development of 249 units, far surpassing the Five- Year goal of 69-13 9 units. Furthermore, the City made good progress improving the supply of affordable housing by providing rehabilitation services to 42 households through home rehabilitation loans, minor home repairs, debris box vouchers and the rehabilitation of 31 0- 312 Miller Ave. After three years, including the work of Rebuilding Together Peninsula, the City has served 171 of the 378 to 425 expected over the Consolidated Plan's five-year period. All of these programs increase the affordability and sustainability of decent housing in the City of South San Francisco. B. Priority: Provide service-enriched shelter and transitional housing for homeless individuals and families. The City of South San Francisco's Continuum of Care strategy is multifaceted and focuses on funding and coordinating nonprofit agency services. Since homelessness is a regional issue, the City participates in San Mateo County's Homeless Consortium and works closely with the County Office of Homelessness to assist in providing and coordinating housing and shelter for homeless persons. Agencies funded by the City, such as Shelter Network, Samaritan House, CORA and Human Investment Project, also coordinate their efforts with the County to maximize the resources available to help homeless people. Additionally, North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) provides case management, referrals, and emergency assistance including housing vouchers and food to homeless people. NPNSC's clients at risk ofhomelessness benefit from these services as well as the Agency's financial assistance for rental security deposits and utility payments. The City serves homeless residents with special needs in several ways. People with HIV / AIDS can receive food, counseling and housing assistance from ELLIPSE Peninsula AIDS Services. Also, the Center for Independence of the Disabled (CID) provides numerous services to help disabled residents remain independent and avoid institutionalization and homelessness. These services include training in daily living activities, referrals to personal attendants, training by an occupational therapist and home accessibility modifications. (See Housing Activities - Priority C: Provide service- enriched housing opportunities for individuals and families with special needs including, but not limited to, seniors, people with physical and developmental disabilities, domestic violence survivors, people with AIDS/HIV, and people in treatment for substance abuse.) All non-profits funded through the City leveraged funds with donations from private individuals, foundations, corporations, in-kind donations and/or fees for service. 1. Shelter Network- Crossroads The City provided Shelter Network with Redevelopment Agency funds in the amount of $18,000 for the Family Crossroads Shelter. This transitional housing facility was available to homeless families citywide. On-site services include support groups, job 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 9 of28 -15- development and other individualized services to help families secure permanent housing. During 2005-2006, Family Crossroads exceeded the City's goal of serving 35 individuals by serving 43 individuals in 14 households. At Family Crossroads, all 14 households were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of these households was African-AmericanlBlack-3 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-2, White-3, Hispanic/White-l and Hispanic/Other-5. Additionally, 12 households served were female-headed and 7 households were headed by a person with a disability. This program provided increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. 2. Shelter Network- Maple Street The City provided Shelter Network with Redevelopment Agency funds in the amount of $7,500 for the Maple Street Shelter. This emergency and transitional housing facility was available to homeless individuals in South San Francisco. On-site services include support groups, job development and other individualized services to help individuals secure permanent housing. During 2005-2006, Maple Street Shelter served 28 people, exceeding the City's goal of serving 20 people. Twenty-27 (27) clients served were at or below 30% AMI and I was below 50% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White-I 9, African-AmericanlBlack- 3, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-I, Asian-2, Hispanic/Other-2, and HispaniclWhite-I. Four households were headed by a female, 2 by an elderly individual and 20 by persons with disabilities. This program provided increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. . 3. Samaritan House-Safe Harbor Homeless Shelter The City provided $7,000 in RDA funds to Samaritan House for the operation of the North County Homeless Shelter. The North County Emergency Shelter is located in South San Francisco and provides 90 beds each night for homeless men and women. In addition to emergency shelter and food, Samaritan House provides on-site substance abuse education and counseling, employment and job development counseling, and health services. Eighty-eight (88) South San Francisco residents were served in 2005-06. All 88 individuals were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White- 46, African-American/Black-13, Asian-2, Asian/White-I, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-}, Other-7 and Hispanic/White-I 8. This program provided increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. 4. Human Investment Project (HIP) The City provided $22,500 in Redevelopment Agency funds to HIP's Home Sharing Program to assist individuals and families, including those at risk of becoming homeless, in finding shared housing. This program is available to individuals and families citywide. During 2005-2006, HIP's program helped 100 individuals looking for shared housing. This achievement fell short of the City's goal of helping up to 145 individuals in their search for affordable housing. HIP's funding will be prorated in FY2006-2007 if they do not meet their service goals. Of the families helped, 70 were at or below 30% AMI, 18 were at or below 50% AMI, 9 were at or below 80% AMI and 3 were at or below 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 10 0/28 -16- 100%AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the families was White-26, African- AmericanlBlack - 7, Hispanic/Other- 31, Asian-l 7 , Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-I, Asian/White-2, African American/White-I, Native AmericanlNative Alaskan/White-l, Hispanic/White-3 and Other-II. In addition, females headed 34 of the families served, elderly people headed 23, and 31 households headed by a person with a disability. This program provided increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five- Year Plan Goals In 2005-2006 the City continued to serve the needs of homeless individuals and families by funding agencies that not only provide shelter for the homeless, but also provide counseling, support groups and job counseling. The City allocated $55,000 in RDA funds to four agencies serving the homeless population. Safe Harbor provides emergency housing for individuals and has served 301 South San Francisco residents since FY03-04. Additionally, the City funded Shelter Network's Maple Street Shelter, which provides both emergency and transitional housing for individuals. Since FY 03-04, Maple Street has served 105 homeless individuals from South San Francisco. Shelter Network's Family Crossroads provides assistance to homeless families. Over the last three years, Family Crossroads has served 37 South San Francisco households. HIP Housing is the fourth agency the city funds. They have provided housing referrals and home share counseling to 342 South San Francisco residents since FY03-04. Additional agencies providing services to South San Francisco residents at risk of homelessness include Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) and North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC). Through partnerships with these agencies, the City is meeting the goals laid out in the Five- Y ear Consolidated Plan. Each year the City will continue to assess the effectiveness of these agencies in addressing the needs of homeless individuals and families from South San Francisco. All four of these programs provide accessibility to decent affordable housing. C. Priority: Provide service-enriched housing opportunities for individuals and families with special needs including, but not limited to, seniors, people with physical and developmental disabilities, domestic violence survivors, people with AIDS/IllV, and people in treatment for substance abuse. Elderly and disabled residents constitute special needs groups in South San Francisco. Both require special programs and services that will allow them to remain in their homes in a safe and accessible environment. The City has funded the Center for Independence of the Disabled (CID) for many years and continues to provide funding. Services provided by CID are crucial for the disabled community, allowing them to remain in their homes or to move into new housing that is accessible to them. Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) provides shelter for domestic violence survivors who must leave their current housing to escape abusive situations. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 11 of28 -17- 1. Center for the Independence of the Disabled - Housing Accessibility Modifications The City provided $17,108.20 in CDBG funds to the Center for the Independence of the Disabled (CID) to complete housing modifications for disabled residents, enabling them to remain in their homes in a safe and accessible environment. The program is available citywide to low-income residents. This program increased accessibility to suitable living environments. During 2005-2006 CID served 26 disabled-resident households, falling just short of the City's goal of30 households. Work was slowed down during the year as the agency adjusted to new project approval forms and because they needed to pull more building permits than usual. Work is on track for the next fiscal year. Of the families served, 21 were at or below 30% AMI and 5 were at or below 50% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the families was White-14, Hispanic/White-6, African American/Black-l, Asian-2, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-2 and Other-I. In addition, 12 ofthe households served were female-headed and elderly people headed 24. All 26 households were headed by a person with a disability. 2. Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) CORA provided shelter for battered women and their children as well as food, clothing, counseling and legal services. Services are provided in English, Spanish and Tagalog. The program exceeded the City's goal of7 by providing services to 15 women and children. Of the clients assisted, all 15 were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White-7, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-3 and HispaniclWhite-5. All 7 households were headed by a female. The program was funded with $4,000 in CDBG funds. This program provided increased accessibility to a suitable living environment. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five-Year Plan Goals In 2005-06, the third year of the five-year Consolidated Plan, the City made good progress meeting the needs of people with special needs by working with agencies such as cm and CORA. Since FY03-04, Center for Independence of the Disabled has made a total of 81 homes more accessible to disabled residents and CORA has provided shelter and service to 33 women and children survivors of domestic violence. The City also provided funding to ELLIPSE to assist 61 households with illY/AIDS and to PARCA to provide services to 228 individuals with disabilities and their families over the last three years. IV. Non-Housing Community Development Activities To help create a healthier and safer community, the City of South San Francisco uses the Community Development Block Grant to fund an array of non-profit agencies that provide essential social services to working families. All non-profits funded through the City leveraged funds with donations from private individuals, foundations, corporations, in-kind donations and/or fees for service. Funded services range from childcare and youth programs to senior services and general social services. The City also uses CDBG funds for building improvements that help revitalize the Downtown, improve facilities that 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 12 of28 -18- provide services to low-income residents, and make buildings accessible to people with disabilities. A. Priority: Provide core public services activities to improve the quality of life for low-income individuals and families, including those at risk of becoming homeless and special needs groups. 1. Child care The City provided financial assistance to agencies providing childcare to low- and moderate-income families. These programs were available to families citywide. All four childcare programs led to increased affordability to create suitable living environments for the families participating in the program. a. Child Care Coordinating Council The Child Care Coordinating Council provided short-term childcare for 2 children from families in crisis falling short of the City's goal of 4 children. The agency processed several applications for stipends, but the families did not follow through. The program was funded with $3,895.35 in CDBG for FY2005-2006. The agency did not request funding for this program for the following fiscal year. All two (2) of the families assisted were at or below 50% AMI. Both children were White and both were from families headed by a female-head of household. b. City-Sponsored Day Care City of South San Francisco Childcare Program provided childcare on a sliding scale to 12 families, nearly meeting the City's goal of assisting 15 children. Due to increases in the cost of childcare and deeper subsidies for extremely low-income families, the grant did not cover costs for 15 children. The program was funded with $10,000 in CDBG funds. Of the clients served, six (6) were at or below 30% AMI, 5 were at or below 50% AMI and I was at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the children was White-4, Asian-3, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-l and Hispanic/White-4. Six homes had a female head of household. c. Friends to Parents Friends to Parents provided affordable childcare for 41 low-income children ages two weeks to 5.9 years, exceeding the City's goal of serving 31 children. Thirty-two (32) of the children were at or below 30% AMI, 3 were at or below 50% AMI and 6 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White-6, African-American/Black-l, Asian-12, American Indian/Alaskan/Black-l, Hispanic/American Indian! Alaskan-l , Hispanic/American Indian/ Alaskan/White-16, Hispanic/African American/Black-l, Hispanic/White-2 and Hispanic/Other-I. Twenty-six (26) ofthe households served were female-headed. The program was funded with $4,000 in CDBG. d. SSFUSD - Children's Center South San Francisco Unified School District (SSFUSD) Children's Center provides childcare 11 hours a day as well as a summer program. The School District used its $2,000 CDBG grant for supplies and field trips during the summer. The program assisted 231 children, exceeding the City's goal of serving 165 children. Of these, 82 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 13 of28 -19- were at or below 30% AMI, 77 were at or below 50% AMI and 72 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White-5, Asian-29, Black/African American-4, Black/African AmericanlWhite-1, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-2, Hispanic/American Indian/ Alaskan-42, HispaniclWhite-57, Hispanic/Other-83 and Other-8. One hundred eighty-five (185) of the households served were female-headed households. One household was headed by an elderly individual and two had a disabled head of household. 2. Senior Services The City provided fmancial assistance to agencies that assist seniors with food and social services. These programs are available to families citywide. All three programs serving seniors provided accessibility to a suitable living environment. a. City-sponsored Adult Day Care Adult Day Care Program, a program sponsored by the City of South San Francisco, provided recreational and nutritional programs for 32 low-income South San Francisco seniors, nearly meeting the revised goal of assisting 35 clients. The program was funded with $19,000 in CDBG funds. All 32 clients were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White-20, Hispanic/\Vhite-5 and Asian-7. Three (3) of the households served were female- headed households and 17 were elderly-headed households. The program is available to seniors citywide. b. Second Harvest Food Bank Second Harvest Food Bank provided weekly grocery bag deliveries to 435 senior and disabled individuals. The agency exceeded the City's goal of serving 260 individuals. The program was funded with $4,000 in CDBG funds. All of the clients served were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White-125, African- American/Black-5, Asian-138, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander-20, American- Indian/Alaskan-5, American Indian/Alaskan & VVhite-1, Hispanic/African American/BlacklWhite-l, HispaniclNative Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-I, HispaniclWhite-38, Hispanic/Other-75 and Other-26. One hundred sixty-three (163) were female-headed households, 33 were households headed by a disabled individual and 288 were elderly-headed households. c. Ombudsman Program of San Mateo County The Ombudsman Program monitored adult-care facilities, advocating for residents of 39 long-term care facilities in the City of South San Francisco. The program received $1,700 in CDBG funding. They provided advocacy and counseling for 49 low- income residents, exceeding the City's goal of30. All 49 residents were at or below 80% AMI. The ethnic and racial breakdown of clients was AsianlWhite-2, VVhite-43 and Black/African American-4. Forty-three residents were from elderly- and disabled- headed households. 3. General Social Services The City provided financial assistance to agencies helping families with social services including case management, health referrals, housing, literacy, and advocacy programs. 2005-2006 CAPER City a/South San Francisco Page 14 0/28 -20- These programs are available to families citywide. These programs provided new accessibility to a suitable living environment. a. North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) provided food, clothing, shelter, transportation, counseling, information and referral services, rental security deposits and assistance with utility bills to 2,387 low-income individuals, surpassing the goal of serving 2,000 people. NPNSC services also include emergency hotel vouchers to prevent temporary episodes ofhomelessness. The program received $24,000 in CDBG funds. Of the individuals served, 2,029 were at or below 30% AMI and 358 were at or below 50% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White-499, African-America/Black-202, Asian-50, American IndianlNative Alaskan- 5, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-l06, Hispanic/White-l,409 and Other-l 16. In addition, 598 of the households served were female-headed households, 46 were elderly-headed households and 59 were households headed by a disabled person. b. The Tooth Mobile The Tooth Mobile offered on-site dental services to low-income children, adults and seniors in South San Francisco. The Tooth Mobile served 424 low-income clients, providing them with dental screenings, preventive care and follow-up dental treatments. The program received $14,000 in CDBG funds. Of the individuals served, 341 were at or below 50% AMI and 83 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White-60, African-AmericanlBlack-49, Asian-37, Asian/White-5, African American/Black/White"'7, Hispanic/White-232 and Other-34. c. Proiect READ Project READ, a program of the South San Francisco Library, trains tutors to teach individuals reading and writing skills. Fifty-six (56) adults were tutored through this program, surpassing the City's goal of serving 40 adults. The program was funded with $6,000 in CDBG funds and was available to residents citywide. Of the individuals served, 52 were at or below 30% AMI, 1 was at or below 50% AMI and 3 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White- 11, African-AmericanlBlack-9, Hispanic/White-20, Asian-13 and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-2 and Other-I. Twenty-two (22) clients were from female-headed households, 3 from elderly-headed households and 1 from a household headed by a disabled person. d. Sitike Counseling Center Sitike Counseling provides substance abuse counseling to South Francisco residents. Sitike received $10,300 in RDA funds from the City, which it used to help provide counseling to 56 low-income individuals from South San Francisco. The program is available to residents citywide. Of the individuals served, 52 were at or below 30% AMI and 4 were at or below 50% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was White- 21, African- AmericanlBlack - 7, Hispanic/White- 21, American Indian/Alaskan-2, and Other-5. Four (4) clients were from female-headed households. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page]50f28 -21- 4. Battered Women's Services The City funded CORA and the Rape Trauma Services Center to provide housing, counseling and advocacy programs to victims of sexual and domestic violence. These programs provided accessibility to a suitable living environment. a. Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse (See Housing Priority C) b. Rape Trauma Services Center Rape Trauma Services Center provided information, resources and support to 445 South San Francisco sexual-assault survivors. This far exceeded the City's goal of serving 340 individuals. The program was funded with $5,000 in CDBG funds. Of the clients served, 87 were at or below 30% AMI, 141 were at or below 50% AMI, 160 were at or below 80% AMI, and 57 were above 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White-117, American Indian/Alaskan-2, Asian-87, Asian & White-2, African-American/Black-19, African American/Black/White-8, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander-41, Other-21, HispaniclWhite-40 and Hispanic/Other-10S. In addition 120 of the households served were female-headed households, 9 were elderly headed households and 2 households were headed by a disabled person. 5. Disabled Services The City provided fmancial assistance to agencies offering peer counseling and life-skills training to disabled persons, recreation to disabled youth and nutrition supplements to people with HN/AIDS. These programs were available to residents citywide. Both of these programs provided accessibility to a suitable living environment. a. P ARCA - Peninsula Association for Retarded Children and Adults P ARCA provided support, information, referrals, outreach, advocacy, and recreation opportunities to approximately 18 low-income and 5 moderate-income South San Francisco individuals that had a family member with developmental disabilities. P ARCA exceeded their adjusted goal of serving 5 individuals. The City allocated $4,000 in CDBG funds to the program in 2005-06. One (1) family served was at or below 30% AMI, 14 were at or below 50% AMI and 3 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was Asian-2, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander- 2, White-7, Hispanic/White-7, One (1) was from a female-headed household. b. ELLIPSE Peninsula Aids Program ELLIPSE provided professional and volunteer in-home support to 16 very low- income individuals. Services provided included: light housekeeping, grocery delivery, transportation and counseling. ELLIPSE met the City's goal of serving 15 individuals suffering from HIV/AIDS. ELLIPSE did not apply for funding for FY2006-2007 because the agency is undergoing a re-organization. The program was funded with $4,000 in CDBG. Fifteen (15) individuals served were at or below 30% AMI and one (1) was at or below 50% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up was White-6, African- American/Black-2, Asian-3, Asian/White-1, Hispanic/White-4. Sixteen (16) were headed by a disabled person. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 16 of28 -22- 6. Youth Services The City provided financial assistance to agencies offering counseling and activities to youth experiencing abuse, truancy, disabilities, behavioral problems, and/or gang activity. These programs are available to low-income youth citywide. Both of these programs provided increased accessibility to a suitable living environment. a. John's Closet John's Closet provided new clothing for 138 very low-income youth attending elementary schools serving the CDBG target area. The agency met the City's revised goal of providing clothing to 130 children. The program was funded with $3,000 in CDBG funds. All of the clients served were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the clients was Native AmericanlNative Alaskan -1, White-I, African-American/Black-2, Asian-I 0, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-7, Hispanic/African American/Black - 3, Hispanic/White- 7, Hispanic/Other-l 04 and Other-3. Seventeen (17) households were female-headed households and 2 were elderly headed households. b. North Peninsula Family Alternatives (NPF A) NPF A counseled 74 parents and their children who are experiencing delinquency, gang activity, and abuse problems. The program was funded with $8,000 in CDBG funds and exceeded the City's goal of helping 60 very low-income clients by serving 74 clients. Of the clients served, all 74 were at or below 30% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the families was Hispanic/Other-74. Twenty-six (26) of these households had a female head of household. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five-Year Plan Goals-Non-Housing Activities In 2005-06, the third year of the five-year Consolidated Plan, the City made considerable progress towards meeting the goals of providing core public services activities for low- income individuals and families, including those at risk of becoming homeless and special needs groups. The City continues to use CDBG grants to nonprofit agencies as its primary vehicle for providing core social services to low-income residents. Over the past year, the City has funded more than 17 programs providing social services to the community. To date, these programs have provided: . Childcare to 775 very low- and low-income individuals . Senior services to 1,387 individuals . General social services, literacy training, advocacy, counseling and dental services to 10,123 low-income individuals . Youth services to 798 individuals The City's nonprofit partners have leveraged their small CDBG grants of $1,700 to $24,000 to maximize the services they offer South San Francisco residents. They have enriched the lives of many low-income residents through the services they provide. B. Priority: Sustain and increase the level of business and economic activity in areas that serve or have a high percentage of low-income residents. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 17 of28 -23- The City's economic and community development strategy for Downtown includes structural improvements to maximize the use of commercial buildings and fal(ade improvement assistance for businesses. I. City-Sponsored Commercial Rehabilitation The City-Sponsored Commercial Rehabilitation Program provides fmancial and technical assistance to property owners undertaking structural, fal(ade and business sign improvements to their buildings. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings and improve the appearance of the downtown. The program is available in the Historic Downtown district. This program is an important part of the City's efforts to increase the downtown area's commercial viability. The downtown district serves residents who are primarily low- income and Hispanic. More than 55 percent of the residents within close proximity to the downtown are low-income. The City anticipates that improvements to the downtown will help increase sales, lead to greater stability of businesses, retain jobs, and reduce vacanCIes. In 2005-06 the City provided technical assistance and code enforcement action at 11 businesses. It also helped fund new awnings for three businesses at 324-332 Grand Ave, as well as a new awning at 212 Baden Ave. Three businesses located at 423-425 Grand Ave received a grant to refurbish their signs once the property owner painted the building. A new business at 415 Linden Ave received a grant for a new sign. Improvements were completed on an historic downtown building. Total funds granted in 2005-2006 were $23,596.67. This program provides sustainability for the purpose of increased economic development. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five-Year Plan Goals-Non-Housing Activities In 2005-06, the third year of the five-year Consolidated Plan, the City made considerable progress towards meeting the goal to sustain and increase the level of business and economic activity in areas that serve or have a high percentage of low-income residents. The City continues to be active with its non-housing rehabilitation activities. Since FY03- 04 the City has completed 3 commercial fal(ade improvements, including the Boys and Girls Club, funded signs, awnings and exterior improvements for 10 businesses. Staff has provided technical assistance to an additional 18 businesses. C. Priority: Preserve and improve public facilities that serve a high percentage of low-income residents. Disabled access modifications and community facility rehabilitation are undertaken to improve facilities used by the low- and moderate-income community in South San Francisco. 1. Gardiner Park ADA Modifications The City provided $26,916.43 to furnish and install ADA approved playground equipment at Gardiner Park. The park is located in a low-income census tract. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page]80f28 -24- 2. Grand Ave Library ADA Modifications The Grand Ave Library did not have a fully compliant ADA bathroom. The City provided $18,400 in CDBG funding to bring the bathroom into compliance. All work was done under Davis-Bacon. 3. CORA (Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse) ADA Modifications In partnership with the County of San Mateo and the other entitlement cities, South San Francisco granted CORA $20,000 to renovate their shelter for survivors of domestic violence. This renovation will create an accessible unit and address other repair needs. CORA spent $14,675 oftheir grant in FY05-06. The balance will be spent in FY06-07. Comparison of 2005-2006 Achievements with Five-Year Plan Goals-Non-Housing Activities Over the last three years, the City has completed six public facility projects. In 2003-04 the City worked with Families on Track to acquire and install a modular unit to expand its service capacity-the Agency as a result was able to help 218 families. In 2004-05, the City completed essential ADA modifications to two vital public facilities-Orange Memorial Park and Orange Library-improving access to services and recreation for the City's disabled citizens. During the last fiscal year, the City continued to emphasize ADA modifications and providing funds to facilities that serve the neediest residents of South San Francisco, including survivors of domestic violence. v. Lead-Based Paint Abatement Program The City of South San Francisco is aware of lead paint hazards in its community because of the age of the existing housing stock, particularly in the historic downtown district. The San Mateo County Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program has identified the City as a high-risk area. This designation is based on the City being in the upper 50th percentile for proportion of families living in poverty as well as the City's proportion of population under the age of six and proportion of housing stock built before 1950. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) promulgated new regulations on September 15, 1999, establishing requirements for notification, evaluation, and reduction of lead-based paint hazards in federally owned residential property and housing receiving federal assistance. The purpose of these regulations is to protect children under the age of six by eliminating or minimizing lead-based paint hazards in housing. The regulation significantly increases the quantity of testing and home maintenance, repair, or rehabilitation work that must be performed in a lead-safe manner. They also require lead hazard controls based on programs, which vary depending on the nature of the activity, amount of assistance, and duration of the relationship with the recipient of federal funding. HUD's new Lead Safe Housing Regulation took effect on September 15,2000. The County of San Mateo and the cities of South San Francisco, San Mateo, Daly City and Redwood City worked together to submit a Lead Based Paint Transition Plan to HUD 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 19 0/28 -25- and to implement the regulations by August 2001. South San Francisco met this deadline and is in compliance with the regulations. To implement the regulations, the City has continued to work with other cities in San Mateo County and the County of San Mateo to make training classes available to city staff and contractors. Besides sharing information on training classes, the cities and County maintain a list of certified contractors and maintenance/rehabilitation workers that can perform work for all the jurisdictions. The City also encourages its regular contractors and their workers to become certified abatement workers/supervisors. Bid packages include information about lead-based paint hazards and training available to contractors. Outreach efforts have also included letters, media publications and other direct outreach to the City's contractors and other potential contractors. The City of South San Francisco also continues to attend lead information meetings held regularly with the County of San Mateo and other cities on the Peninsula. During these meetings the cities and County share information about training courses, certified lead abatement contractors and workers, as well as plan efforts to increase the supply of certified workers throughout the County. VI. Fair Housing Plan Through the San Mateo County HOME Consortium, the cities of Daly City, Redwood City, San Mateo and South San Francisco contracted with Project Sentinel to develop and produce and updated "Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing in San Mateo County, California (Al)." This section of our Annual Plan lays out the City's required Fair Housing Action Plan in response to the findings of the draft updated Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing. The report indicated a number of impediments and potential impediments to fair housing in San Mateo County, although South San Francisco was not cited as having any policies that directly impede fair housing and was listed as one of the stronger jurisdictions in preventing predatory housing practices through increasing the supply of affordable housing. The study found that the shortage of affordable housing and a high ratio of older housing stock in San Mateo County can constitute an impediment to fair housing, due to a high correlation between poverty levels, substandard housing, cost burdened and over- crowded households and Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Although, South San Francisco is not one of the most vulnerable cities in the Consortium, conditions common to all of the entitlement cites studied, such as old substandard housing, low vacancy rates, and high numbers of lower income immigrants without good command of English or knowledge of fair housing law, set the stage for predatory housing practices directed at people of color, low and moderate income households, people with disabilities, large families, and other groups protected under fair housing laws. The study found some zoning and land use policies that constitute impediments to fair housing in other jurisdictions, but none were found in South San Francisco's zoning and land use policies. A common area of concern countywide is discriminatory banking and lending policies. The study found higher denial rates for mortgage loans and a higher reliance on sub- prime loans among Black and Hispanic residents. The study also found a countywide 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 20 of28 -26- pattern of buildings that were not in compliance with accessibility provisions for the disabled in the Fair Housing Amendments Act. This non-compliance is an impediment to fair housing choice. In response to these findings, the City of South San Francisco maintains its support for fair housing organizations, fair housing education and outreach, and housing development and rehabilitation work that directly addresses the housing market factors that can put residents at greater risk of housing discrimination. Today, the City of South San Francisco continues to work to overcome impediments and promote fair housing by contracting with two agencies, Project Sentinel and La Raza Centro Legal, to assist residents with housing discrimination complaints. The two agencies provide counseling, legal advocacy, and tenant/landlord mediation services in issues of fair housing and housing habitability. By having two agencies providing this service the City is able to offer a wider range of services to citizens needing fair housing counseling. Fair housing services are available to residents citywide. The City designates its annual allocation of HOME Administrative funds to carry out its fair housing action plan. I. Project Sentinel The City contributed $3,525 in HOME funds to Project Sentinel to provide fair housing counseling and advocacy for South San Francisco residents, including: fair housing education, enforcement and dispute resolution in cases of housing discrimination. Additionally, Project Sentinel provided community education and information on mortgage default and delinquency. In 2005-2006, Project Sentinel met the City's goal of assisting 8-12 households by providing casework for 9 low-income South San Francisco households experiencing housing discrimination. Three (3) households were at or below 30% AMI, 4 were below 50% AMI, and 2 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the households was White-5, African-America/Black-3 and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander-I. Six (6) households served were female-head households and 1 household was headed by a disabled person. One household had an elderly head of household. Additionally, the agency responded to 42 telephone inquiries from residents requesting fair housing information. This program provided increased accessibility to decent affordable housing. 2. La Raza Centro Legal La Raza Centro Legal received $14,475 in HOME funds from the City to provide South San Francisco residents with fair housing counseling, advocacy and legal representation in housing matters, such as habitability and eviction prevention. In 2005-2006 La Raza provided legal assistance to 220 individuals. This number fell short of the City's goal of serving 400 individuals. La Raza lost a key staff member during the program year and during the transition they were not able to serve as many clients. One hundred Eighty-six (186) individuals were at or below 30% AMI, 31 individuals were at or below 50% and 3 were at or below 80% AMI. The racial and ethnic make-up of the households was American Indian/Alaska Native-3, African- American/Black-5, White-19, Asian-6, and Hispanic/Other-I 87. Thirty-eight (38) 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 210/28 -27- households were female-headed household, 9 were senior-headed households and 23 households were headed by a disabled person. 3. Additional Actions i. Information and Referral Through information on the City website and brochures located throughout the City, South San Francisco continues to provide educational materials about fair housing issues to residents and non-profits that work with low-income people in the City- including information about the services of Project Sentinel and La Raza Centro Legal. ii. Preservation and Construction of Affordable Housing Preservation and construction of affordable housing were cited as a way to make a community less conducive to predatory housing practices and housing discrimination. The City of South San Francisco continues its housing development and rehabilitation work, directly mitigating conditions that put protected groups more at risk of housing discrimination. Inclusionary zoning ordinances were cited by the study as one of the most powerful tools available to increase the supply of affordable housing. South San Francisco was listed as having the second most effective inclusionary housing ordinance in the County. (For detailed description of work in this area, see also: Section II, Housing Activities, A. Priority: Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housingfor very low-, low- and moderate-income individuals and families.) VII. Needs of Public Housing The South San Francisco Public Housing Authority operates as a separate entity and submits a Consolidated Plan to HUD separately from the City of South San Francisco. The South San Francisco PHA manages 80 units of affordable public housing. Information about the needs and strategy of the South San Francisco PHA can be found in the South San Francisco PHA 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan. VIII. Anti-Poverty Strategy The City of South San Francisco has a multifaceted approach to reducing the number of families living in poverty. First, City participation in the acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of affordable housing is contingent upon restricting rents to affordable levels for low-income residents for an extended period oftime (30 to 40 years). This helps reduce the number of families living in poverty by decreasing one of their largest expenses, rent, to a reasonable level. Additionally, the City's housing rehabilitation loan programs offer low- and moderate-income homeowners the opportunity to bring their homes up to current building standards by providing low-interest loans, which facilitate upgrades in a manner that does not burden the family budget. Second, the City has recently adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance that requires developers to make twenty percent (20%) of all new housing units in the City affordable to moderate-income families. All of the inclusionary units must be affordable to families 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 22 0/28 -28- at or below 80% or at or below 120% of the area median income as stipulated in the inclusionary ordinance. Third, efforts to improve the historic downtown business district provide property owners with an opportunity to undertake exterior business improvements, which can include signs, awnings and exterior painting. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings and improve the appearance of the Historic Downtown district. In addition to providing assistance for improving commercial fac;ades, the City actively works with the South San Francisco Chamber of Commerce to meet the needs of downtown businesses and to promote the area. These activities help create a more vibrant business community and new jobs for City residents. Fourth, the City funds several non-profit agencies whose services help low-income residents. For example, by providing childcare subsidies the City is able to help low- income adults work or study while their children are at a childcare center. Similarly, by providing funding to an adult literacy program, the City is able to help residents find employment they may not have been able to secure before knowing how to read. Fifth, the City joined the Stakeholder Committee of the newly formed HOPE (Housing our People Effectively): The Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness in San Mateo County. HOPE is a planning process that will produce concrete and realistic strategies to address the problem ofhomelessness in San Mateo County, with the ultimate goal of ending it within 10 years. Through this multitude of efforts, the City is continually working to help reduce the number of families living in poverty. IX. Other Actions A. Address Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs & Foster and Maintain Mfordable Housing The key obstacle the City faces in meeting underserved needs is the lack of available funds. Therefore, the City has leveraged its limited funds to the fullest extent possible and used them most efficient manner possible. The City has done this by working and coordinating with various organizations to maximize the use of City funds. By drawing on the expertise and resources of various organizations, the City was able to serve a greater number of city residents. To overcome the obstacles of meeting underserved housing needs as well as fostering the development affordable housing, the City continues to make an effort to purchase substandard and/or underutilized land to create affordable housing opportunities such as the proposed project with Habitat for Humanity. In addition, the City's Inc1usionary Housing ordinance requiring new housing developments to make 20 percent of the units affordable to low- and moderate-income families for 55 years is proving to be a success. The City has negotiated for more than 160 below market rate units in various new projects that will be developed over the next few years. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 23 of28 -29- B. Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing/Governmental Constraints In an effort to foster and maintain the supply of affordable housing and to remove barriers to affordable housing development, the City of South San Francisco has continued to monitor its policies to identify areas where the City can make improvements. The City's approved Housing Element has a review and analysis of the City's housing stock, demographics, availability of land, constraints to developing housing, and many other factors. With the City's new Housing Element in place, the City continues working to foster, maintain, and remove barriers to affordable housing. Among the steps the City has taken are: · Implementing an adopted density bonus ordinance · Enforce the City's inclusionary housing ordinance requiring that 20 percent of all new housing units in residential developments of 4 or more units in the City be affordable to moderate-income families · Encourage Transit Oriented development near the South San Francisco and San Bruno BART Stations · Expediting reviews of affordable housing projects and provide technical assistance to developers · Apply amended zoning ordinance to give disabled residents greater flexibility making accessibility modifications to their homes · Allowing higher densities in senior housing projects · Permitting reduced parking requirements for senior-care facilities · Requiring builders to include disabled-accessible units in new apartment projects C. Develop an Institutional Structure & Improve and Enhance Coordination of Services In 2005-2006 the City continued to work closely with non-profit social service providers, other cities, the School District, the County, and the Chamber of Commerce to coordinate the delivery of services to residents and to assist neighborhood groups with space for events and materials to help them conduct community activities. Specific efforts included: · Participated in the San Mateo County HOME Program Consortium · Worked with the County of San Mateo and other CDBG jurisdictions to implement HUD's Lead Safe Housing Regulation · Served as a member of the County's Continuum of Care Task Force · Joined the Stakeholder Committee of HOPE (Housing our People Effectively): The Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness in San Mateo County 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 24 of28 -30- · Funded twenty-four (24) agencies serving low-income residents to address needs diverse as childcare, senior services, homelessness, counseling for battered women and services for disabled people · Coordinated with Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition to acquire additional buildings in the Willow Gardens neighborhood · Participated with the County of San Mateo and a nonprofit organization to provide education and opportunities for frrst-time homebuyers · Assisted downtown businesses and the Chamber of Commerce with downtown beautification and improvement projects · Worked with the County of San Mateo, other entitlement cities, and nonprofit agencies to address concerns identified in the Analysis of Impediments for Fair Housing for all of San Mateo County · Continued to work with BRIDGE Housing to develop affordable housing on County owned property located at Grand and Oak Avenues · Continued to work with Peninsula Habitat for Humanity to obtain entitlements to develop affordable housing at 440 Commercial Avenue · Worked with La Raza Centro Legal and Project Sentinel to provide fair housing representation and counseling · Continued to work collaboratively with North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center to manage the City's minor home repair program · Participated in a County-wide CDBG Working group, the purpose of which is to better coordinate communication with CDBG colleagues and sub-recipients and to develop consistent practices throughout San Mateo County D. Certificates of Consistency The City of South San Francisco did not receive any requests from other organizations to issue certificated of consistency with the City's Consolidated Plan. x. Monitoring Standards and Procedures The City has established procedures that ensure City programs comply with federal program requirements and City policies. For agencies that receive CDBG, HOME and RDA funding, the City required and the agencies submitted quarterly reports of their accomplishments and financial transactions. These reports keep the City informed about the progress agencies are making towards meeting their objectives. The City also conducts site visits and requires the agencies to submit an annual audit. The City undertook one project requiring compliance with Davis-Bacon. The City Council has reviewed the City's annual reports to ensure that the City is applying its resources to meet community goals. The reports reviewed this year include the CAPER (Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report) for federal programs, the annual report for the Redevelopment Agency and the annual city audit. 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 250/28 -31- XI. Citizen Participation For citizen participation, the City followed its established citizen participation plan for both the 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan and the CAPER. A. One Year Action Plan Request for Proposals for CDBG Funding A request for proposals for CDBG funding was sent to all community agencies on the Housing and Community Development mailing list on January 7, 2005. A public notice of the RFP availability was published in the San Mateo County Times on January 15, 2005. The RFP was also posted on the City's website. Public Hearing on Community Needs On March 9, 2005 the City held a public hearing with the Mayor and City Council to receive public comments on the City's housing and community development needs. Many community agencies that applied for CDBG funding came to the hearing and spoke on behalf of their proposals. A public notice for the hearing was printed as a display advertisement in the San Mateo County Times on February 26,2005. Notice of the hearing was mailed to all community agencies on the Housing and Community Development mailing list. A vailabilitv of a Proposed Annual Action Plan The proposed 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan was available for public comment from March 12 to April 13, 2005. Copies were available at the Economic and Community Development Office at City hall as well as South San Francisco libraries. Public Hearing to Finalize the 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan On April 13,2005, the City held a public hearing to finalize the 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan. A public notice for the hearing was printed as a display advertisement in the San Mateo County Times on April 2, 2005. Notice of the hearing was mailed to all community agencies on the Housing and Community Development mailing list. Final Annual Action Plan Copies of the Final Annual Action Plan and a summary of the plan were made available to the public for free and within two days of a request. In addition, copies were made available at the economic and Community Development Office at City hall as well as South San Francisco libraries. There were no requests for copies of the 2005-2006 One Year Action Plan. B. CAPER A notice announcing the public comment period and a public hearing for the CAPER was published in the San Mateo County Times on September 9, 2006, and a public hearing was held on September 27,2006. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 26 of28 -32- All notices informed citizens about the purpose of the One Year Action Plan and the CAPER and invited them to review the document and give comments to the City Council at the public hearing. XII. Citizen Comments The City did not receive any verbal or written comments during the CAPER public comment period or at the City Council's public hearing on September 27,2006. XIll. Leveraging The City's yearly CDBG entitlement and HOME funds were leveraged with Redevelopment Agency funds and private investment. Projects leveraged with these funds include: the Willow Gardens rehabilitation, housing development projects, homelessness prevention, fair housing and frrst-time homebuyer loans. The nonprofit agencies receiving grants from the City leveraged the grants with their own agency funding from foundations, state and county grants, private donors, corporations, in-kind donors and/or fees for service. Specific details of the matching funds for each project are provided in Sections II - Housing Activities and Section III - Non-Housing Activities of the report. XIV. Displacement During 2005-2006 the City did not displace any tenant or business as a result of federally funded activities. Also, no tenants or businesses were displaced as a result of Redevelopment Agency activities or due to other City-sponsored projects. XV. Conclusion and Self-Evaluation The City of South San Francisco met or exceeded the majority of the goals set in the 2005-2006 Annual Plan and made good progress meeting the goals of the 2003-2008 Consolidated Plan. Table 1 of this report summarizes the accomplishments achieved for each priority established in the 2003-2008 Consolidated Plan, and the individual accomplishments established for each program in the 2005-2006 Action Plan. In 2005-2006, the City of South San Francisco's housing programs continued to emphasize new development and acquisition and rehabilitation of existing units. The City has started several projects that are progressing according to schedule. Both the Habitat for Humanity and BRIDGE project are scheduled for completion prior to 2008. Work in the Willow Gardens neighborhood continues to revitalize an extremely low-income area, while at the same time retaining affordability. Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition now owns a total of 9 buildings in the neighborhood. The City completed the acquisition of a 3-unit building at 714 Linden Avenue. One of the areas of greatest success for the city is in meeting its inclusionary housing development of BMR units. Private development including 184 BMR units have either been completed, are under construction or have been negotiated to date. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 27 of28 -33- The owner-occupied housing rehabilitation program, comprised of low-interest loans, code enforcement vouchers and the House Helpers program, continues to perform well, albeit with a slant towards smaller home repairs. The City's emphasis on larger-scale rehabilitation projects and new affordable housing development continues to shift limited staff resources away from moderate-size housing rehabilitation. As a result the City relies heavily on the House Helpers program to help single-family homeowners, in addition to leveraging the work of Rebuilding Together Peninsula. These partnerships with local non-profits enabled the City to serve a greater number of homeowners with fewer resources. The housing rehabilitation loan issued helped the homeowner address pressing repair concerns including roof replacement and a dangerous addition. Although few homeowners utilized the code enforcement vouchers in 05-06, the City the continued to make them available to address emergency needs. Ultimately, home rehabilitation efforts resulted in improvements to 36 low-income residences in South San Francisco. Collaborating with nonprofit agencies to meet the needs oflow-income residents continues to be a priority for the City. Partnerships with nonprofit agencies have allowed the City to leverage limited funds and better coordinate housing and social services for low-income residents, homeless people, and people with special needs. The agencies continue to provide large numbers of residents with a variety of essential services including assistance with rental security deposits, counseling for battered women and the provision of food, clothing and shelter. Moreover, the City proves to be creative and flexible in working with these agencies, funding new programs, such as the Ombudsman Program of San Mateo County, to meet the needs of underserved populations. The City also had substantial success with its first-time homebuyer program, placing a total of210ans in the last year. First-time homebuyer loans provide approximately $50,000 to $100,000 per household to bring the cost of housing to levels affordable to low and moderate-income families. The City of South San Francisco's CDBG program is performing well and accomplishing its mission. Leveraging CDBG funds with other City resources, private investment, and the contributions of non-profit agencies, the City has been able to make positive changes in the lives of low-income residents, improve the quality of life in the historic old town and increase economic opportunities for small businesses. 2005-2006 CAPER City o/South San Francisco Page 280/28 -34- Tables Summary of 2005-2006 Accomplishments, Table 1 Summary of Housing Accomplishments, Table 2 -35- 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 15 Continued on the next page 440 Commercial A venue (Housing 3.1) Increased affordability for the purpose of creating new decent affordable housing. Work with Peninsula Habitat for Humanity for the purpose of constructing four three- bedroom affordable ownership units for large low-income families. The units will be completed in FY 2007-08. Finalized DDA and marketing plan. ted in October 2005 and is ding to schedule. · Agreement negotiated with Peninsula Habitat for Humanity to develop four three-bedroom affordable ownership units for large low-income families. · Peninsula Habitat for Humanity secured additional CDBG funds from the County for the project. · Completed entitlement process. · Finalized DDA and marketing plan New Housing Construction County Property at Grand and Oak (Housing 1.1) Increased affordability for the purpose of creating new decent affordable housing. Work with the County of San Mateo and BRIDGE Housing to construct approximately 43 affordable apartments for low and moderate-income families on County owned land at Grand and Oak A venues. It is estimated the units will be completed in 2007. Construction started in October 2005 and is proceeding according to schedule. . . Completed entitlement process with Bridge Housing to develop a 43-unit affordable family housing development. Bridge Housing secured additional funding and finalized land acquisition agreement with the Co Co I \0 M I . A. Priority: families. Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and Section In. Housing Activities TABLE 1 Summary of Accomplishments 2005-2006 CAPER 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 2 of 15 . Inelusionary Housing Development- Below Market Rate (BMR) Units (Housing 3.2) Increased availability for the purpose of creating new decent affordable housing. Under the City's 20% Inclusionary Housing Ordinance various developers will make new affordable units available to residents at or below 80% of AMI and residents at or below 120% of the AMI in the market rate projects they develop. Projects will be either rental or ownership units depending on the type of project under development. . . ompleted construction and fully leased apartment building at the site of the former Escape Hotel- 206 Grand Ave. Signed AHA for three BMR condominium units at the 90 Oak Development. One (l) unit will be available at 50-60% AMI and 1 will be available at 80- 90%AMI. Additionally, one unit will be sold to a family earning up to 120% AMI. Signed AHA with SummerHill Homes for 20 BMR units. 2 units at 50-60%AMI, 4 units at 60-70%AMI, 2 units at 70-80% AMI, 4 units at 80-90% AMI, 3 units at 90-100% AMI, and 5 units at 100-110% AMI. . . . . Oak its were made available to fam or below 120%AMI. . Four offsite units for the Hillside Dev. at 364 Susie Way (Willow Gardens) for I unit at 50- 60% AMI, 1 unit at 50-70%AMI, 1 unit at 50- 90% AMI and I unit at 50-120% AMI. Developer purchased, renovated and leased units. . Negotiated Affordable Housing Agreement for the Fairfield Residential Project for 29 units at 80% and 43 units at 120%. Project is currently under construction. . Negotiated AHA for the Marbella project for 28 units at 80% and 42 units for 120%. Project is currently under construction. . Negotiated off site AHA for III Chestnut for 4 units at 6O%AMI. . Negotiated AHA with Fang & Situ for 1 unit at 90-100%AMI Completed construction and fully leased apartment bldg at 206 Grand -- 2 units at 50%, 1 unit at 60% and 3 units at 80% AMI. Project is currently under Signed AHA for three BMR condominium units at the 90 Oak Development. One (1) unit will be available at 50-60% AMI and 1 will be available at 80-90%AMI. Additionally, one unit will be sold to a family earning up to 120% AMI. Signed AHA with SummerHill Homes for 20 BMR units. 2 units at 50-60%AMI, 4 units at 60- 70%AMI, 2 units at 70-80% AMI, 4 units at 80- 90% AMI, 3 units at 90-100% AMI, and 5 units at 100-110% AMI. I '" (I) I A. Priority: Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income families continued.... individuals and 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 3 of 15 Continued on next page. Acquisition & Rehabilitation Willow Gardens (Housing 2.1) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Continue acquisition and rehabilitation of 48 units to convert into affordable rental units for families at or below 50-60% of the AMI. During 05-06 the City anticipates purchasing I building (4 units), depending on availability. Mid- Peninsula will moderately rehabilitate any units purchased. Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition and the City purchased two buildings in the Willow Gardens neighborhood. 364 Susie Way and 383 Susie Way. These units were purchased from developers to maintain deeper long-term affordabilitv. . . Completed interior rehabilitation of units already owned. Completed $700,000 exterior rehabilitation of units already owned. Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition and the City purchased two buildings in the Willow Gardens neighborhood. 364 Susie Way and 383 Susie Way . First-time Homebuyers First-time Homebuyer Loan Program (Housing 5.0) Increased affordability for the purpose of creating new decent affordable housing. Conduct 1-4 seminars for first-time homebuyers and make 4-5 low interest loans to first time homebuyers who are at or below 80% of the AMI or at or below 120% ofthe AMI. First time homebuyers will able to use the City loans to purchase homes anywhere in the City or in newly constructed BMR units created under the City's BMR ordinance. . . Provided loans to two families below 80% AMI. Both families received both RDA & CDBG loans. Conducted 3 first-time homebuyer seminars. Began actively recruiting for the South City Lights project (formerly Imown as Marbella) that has 70 units available. Units will be sold in FY06-07. . . The First-time Homebuyer Loan Program has assisted 13 families with home purchases. Of these, 4 families received CDBG loans only, 3 received CBDa and RDA loans, I received CDBG, RDA and Housing Trust Fund loans, 3 received an RDA loan, and 2 received an RDA and Housing Trust Fund loan. Conducted 6 first-time homebuyers seminars. Began actively recruiting for the South City Lights project that has 70 units available. Units will be sold in FY06-07. I 00 M I . . families continued A. Priority: Increase, maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 4 of 15 Continued on next page. 310,312 Miller Avenue (Housing 2.2) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. The City will purchase, make improvements, and maintain these properties consisting of7 affordable units to people below 60% of the AMI. The current residents, who are all low income, will not be displaced. 312 Miller was purchased in 2003-2004 and 310 Miller will be purchased in 2004-2005 Acquisition & Rehabilitation Downtown Affordable Housing Program (Housing 2.2) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Housing fund established to provide affordable rental housing for low- and very-low income residents through the acquisition and rehabilitation of dilapidated housing stock. The City conducts feasibility analysis on a regular basis to determine viability of acquisitions. Should an opportunity to create affordable units present itself, the City will immediately allocate funds to the project funded with RDA, HOME funds or CDBG. Renovation completed. . . Negotiated with the owner of two unoccupied hotels in the downtown area to rehabilitate the building and make the units available and affordable. Secured $200,000 in HOME funds for the project. Made an offer on a 9-unit building. Purchased 714 Linden Ave, a three-unit building occupied by low- and very low- income residents. . . . Completed renovation of both properties. contains 3 units. Negotiated with the owner of two unoccupied hotels in the downtown area to rehabilitate the building and make the units available and affordable. Secured $200,000 in HOME funds for the project. Made an offer on a 9-unit building. Purchased 714 Linden Ave, a three-unit building occupied by low- and very low-income residents. I 0"1 (J") I . . . . Purchased 312 Miller A venue. contains 4 units. Ongoing management of existing units. Purchased 310 Miller Ave. The property . The property A. Priority: Increase, families continued. maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 5 of 15 Continued on next page. Debris Box Vouchers (Housing 4.3) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. am. Help low and moderate-income residents in the Downtown/Old Town area and citywide remove accumulated debris and yard waste from their properties. This program will assist 10 residents with approximately $5,000 from the funds allocated to the Rehabilitation Loan Program. Assisted 2 households with debris box vouchers to cure code enforcement violations. Debris box vouchers have assisted 22 low-income households. Emergency Code Violation Vouchers (Housing 4.2) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Provide homeowners grants of up to $2,500 to clear up code violations in their homes. This program is available citywide and will assist 1-3 low-income residents using approximately $15,000 of the funds allocated to the Rehabilitation Loan Pro Low-Income Owner- Occupied Rehabilitation City- Sponsored Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program (Housing 4.1) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Assist low and moderate-income homeowners with housing repairs citywide with priority for the Downtown/Old Town area. 3-5 households will be assisted with low-interest and/or deferred loans up to $35,000 each. The City accepted and approved loans for four low-income homeowners to complete repairs. One homeowner participated in the program and replaced her roof and brought an illegal addition up to code. The City processed one Emergency Voucher for a new furnace. . . The City did not receive any requests for Emergency Code Violation Vouchers in 2003-04 & 2004-05. The City issued one Emergency Voucher in 2005- 06. · Completed rehabilitation at one home serving as a residential care facility for disabled people. · Completed rehabilitation of four owner-occupied low-income residences. I o -::Ii I A. Priority: Increase, maintain and families continued.... improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and City of South San Francisco Page 6 of 15 2005-2006 CAPER Rental Housing Habitabilit La Raza Centro Legal Code Enforcement Assistance (Other Objectives .0) Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. La Raza Centro Legal will assistlOO low income residents citywide in reporting code enforcement violations in their dwellings thus improving habitability conditions and reducing landlord abuse of tenants in South San Francisco. La Raza Centro Legal provided counseling and advocacy to 87 low- income individuals in SSF. . . . . La Raza Central Legal has provided extensive advice and counsel to residents ofthe non-city sponsored housing at the Willow Gardens complex. The agency has also worked with residents of several mobile home parks, including: Treasure Island, Red Arrow and Forest Homes. In FY05-06, La Raza notified 600-700 SSF residents of their services and provided follow- up inspections to 24-35 low-income residents. La Raza Centro Legal provided counseling and advocacy to 87 low-income individuals in SSF in FY 2005-06. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (Housing 4.5) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housin Low-Income Owner- Occupied Rehabilitation Minor Home Repair (House Helpers) (Housing 4.4) Sustainability for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Provide free, minor home repairs to 30-40 very low-income homeowners in the Old Town area and citywide. The program will use approximately $40,000 from the funds allocated to the Rehabilitation Loan Program. The majority of households assisted will be large families with small children and elderly, female heads-of- household. Rehabilitate 5 homes citywide of low- income homeowners, including 1 roof repair. Rehabilitated 6 homes occupied by very low- income people including one roof replacement. Rebuilding Together Peninsula rehabilitated 21 homes for low-income homeowners. I ,..., '<tI I Provided free, minor home repairs for 32 households. NPNSC has provided fioee, minor home repairs for 103 households. A. Priority: Increase, families continued. maintain and improve the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 7 of 15 Continued on next page. Shelter Network - Maple Street (Homeless 2.1) Samaritan House - Safe Harbor (Homeless 2.2) Human Investment Project (Homeless 3.0) Shelter Network - Crossroads (Homeless 1.1 Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. San Mateo County's emergency shelter serving 90 individuals countywide a night with shelter, food, restroom facilities, and supportive services. Safe Harbor will serve 65 homeless individuals citywide. Provide shared housing referrals to 145-180 low- and very-low income individuals. Due to reduced funding, the revised goal is 105- 131 referrals. This year HIP Provided referrals to 100 low- income households looking for shared housing. HIP has provided referrals to 342 households seeking shared housing. Provided emergency shelter to 88 South San Francisco residents over the course ofthe year. Contributed to the operation of an emergency 90- bed winter shelter in South San Francisco. 30 I South San Francisco residents have been served. I N '<:tl I Provide transitional housing and supportive services to up to 20 homeless individuals. Provided transitional & emergency housing to a total of28 homeless individuals. Tlrrough Maple Street, Shelter Network has provided transitional and emergency housing to individuals from South San Francisco. 05 Family shelter that provides transitional housing and supportive services to 35 homeless individuals. Provided transitional housing to a total of 43 homeless individuals in households. 14 Through Crossroads, Shelter Network has provided transitional housing to 37 South San Francisco households. B. Priority: Provide service-enriched shelter and transitional housing for homeless individuals and families. 2005-2006 CAPER Center for Independence of the Disabled (Cm) Housing Accessibility Program (Special Needs 1.1) CORA Formerly: Center for Domestic Violence Prevention (Special Needs 2.1) (Public Services 3.4) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. City of South San Francisco Provide shelter and services to 7 low-income domestic violence survivors and their children. Provided shelter and services to 15 women and children. Page 8 of 15 To date, the Center for Domestic Violence Prevention has provided transitional housing to 33 South San Francisco battered women and children. I (f) ~ I Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provide housing accessibility modifications to the homes of30 low- and very-low income people with disabilities. Provided accessibility modifications to the homes of 26 households. cm has provided housing accessibility modifications to the homes of 81 disabled and elderly people. c. Priority: Provide service-enriched housing opportunities for individuals and families limited to, seniors, people with physical and developmental disabilities, and people in treatment for substance abuse. with special needs domestic violence survivors, including, but not people with AIDS/HIV, 2005-2006 CAPER SSFUSD - Children's Center (public Services 3.1) Continued on next page. City of South San Francisco Provide extracurricular activities to and very-low-income children. Center provided childcare for 231 low- income children. CDBG funds were used for field tri lies. Page 9 of 15 The SSFUSD Children's Center leveraged City funds to provide childcare for 568 low-income children. . Friends to Parents (Public Services 3.1) 165 low- Provide a major subsidy for affordable center- based childcare to 31 infants and preschool children from low- and very-low-income households. Provided childcare for 41 low-income children. Friends to Parents has provided childcare for low-income children. Child care Child Care Coordinating Council (Public Services 3.1) City-Sponsored Child Care (public Services 3.1) CDBG monies provide fee assistance stipends to 15-20 low- and very-low-income children for before and after school recreational program. Provided childcare fee assistance to 12 low- income children. 159 To date the City's program has provided childcare fee assistance to 36 children. Affordability for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Affordability for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Affordability for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Affordability for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. I "O/i "O/i I Provide emergency childcare for up to 4 low- and very-low-income children offamilies in crisis. Processed applications for 6 families. 2 families found childcare and received stipends. To date, the 4Cs has provided extended childcare for 12 low-income children. Priority: Provide core public services activities to those at risk of becoming homeless and special improve the quality of life for low-income needs groups. A. Section IV. Non-Housing Community Development Activities individuals and families, including 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 10 of 15 Continued on the next page Ombudsman Program of San Mateo County (Public Services 3.2) Second Harvest Food Bank (Public Services 3.2) City-Sponsored Adult Day Care (Public Services 3.2) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Monitors adult-care facilities and reports abuse and negligence, advocating for residents of39 long-term care facilities in the City of South San Francisco. Will address the needs of30 low-income seniors or disabled South San Francisco residents living in long-term care facilities. Provided advocacy and counseling for 49 low- income residents. The program has served 90 South San Francisco residents. Provides low- and very-low-income seniors and disabled people a weekly bag of food to supplement their diets. Approximately 260 senior or disabled residents will be served. Provided 435 senior and disabled residents with food on a weekly basis. To date Second Harvest has provided and disabled residents with food. I L() '<:Ii I Provide structured and supervised care in the form of social, educational and recreational activities to 35 low- and very-low-income frail or disabled seniors. Provided day care to 32 South San Francisco seniors on a monthly basis. 1.183 senior The City's program has provided day care for 114 frail and elderly residents Senior Services A. Priority: Provide core public services activities to improve the quality of life for low-income those at risk of becoming homeless and special needs groups. individuals and families, including 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 11 of 15 Continued on next page. Sitike Counseling Center (Public Services 3.3) (Special Needs 4.0) Project READ (Public Services 3.3) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provide chemical dependency treatment for 65 low- and very- low-income women and children. Provided treatment to 56 individuals. General Social Services North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) (Public Services 3.3) The Tooth Mobile Public Services 3.3 Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provides on-site dental services for low- income children, adults, and seniors in South San Francisco. 100% of the beneficiaries are low or very-low income. The Tooth Mobile estimates it will serve approximately 300 individuals with either dental screenings and/or treatment. Provides individualized tutoring in basic skills as well as tutor training for program volunteers. Approximately 40 low- and very- low-income people served. Tutored 56 adults in reading. Treated Project READ has trained tutors and provided tutoring to 146 adults 192 individuals. Provided services to 424 low-income residents of South San Francisco I I.D -:Ii I Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. The San Mateo County core agency located in South San Francisco provides critical social services to 2,000 low- and very-Iow- income individuals with immediate needs. Provided social services to 2,387 individuals. Provided dental services to NPNSC provided social services to 6,857 individuals. ,430 students A. Priority: Provide core public services activities to including those at risk of becoming homeless improve the quality of life for low-income and special needs groups continued individuals and families, 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 12 of 15 Program (Public Services 3.5) (Special Needs 3.1) Continued on next page. Disabled Services P ARCA (Pen. Assoc. for Retarded Children and Adults) (Public Services 3.5) (Special Needs 5.0) ELLIPSE Peninsula Aids Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provide in-home support service to 25-50 low- and very-low-income households with HIV / AIDS. The revised goal due to decreased funding is 15. Served 16 individuals with HIV/AIDS ELLIPSE has provided SUPPOlt services to 6 individuals with HIV / AIDS. Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provide support, information, referrals, outreach, advocacy, and recreation opportunities for approximately 25 low- income individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. The revised goal due to reduced funding was to serve 5 low-income individuals. Provided services to 18 low-income individuals and 5 individuals over 80% AMI. 228 low-income services. CORA (Public Services 3.4) (Special Needs 2.1) Rape Trauma Services Center (Public Services 3.4) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Only San Mateo County agency to provide information, resources, and support to sexual assault survivors. Approximately 340 low- income individuals will be served. Provided information and services to 445 South San Francisco individuals. households have received support Rape Trauma Services has provided services tol,309 individuals. I t-.... '<:ti I See Housing Activities Priority C Battered Women's Services 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 13 of 15 . City-Sponsored Commercial Rehabilitation (Non-Housing 1.1) Sustainability for the purpose of creating suitable living enviromnents. Provide financial and teclmical assistance to property owners undertaking exterior business improvements, which can include signs, awnings and exterior painting. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings and improve the appearance of the Historic Downtown district. Goal: to assist 4-6 businesses. . . Proved grant for signs at 4 businesses. Teclmical assistance and code enforcement action at 11 businesses. Provided grants for awnings to 4 businesses. · Provided sign and awning grants to 9 businesses. . . Provided funding to complete fayade improvements at 4 downtown buildings including a historic building. Provided technical assistance and code enforcement action at 18 businesses. Priority: Sustain and increase the level of business and economic activity income residents. in areas that serve or have a high percentage of low- B. North Peninsula Family Alternatives (NPF A) (Public Services 3.6) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Provide parenting skills to 60 low- and very- low-income households. Provided parenting skills and services to 74 very low-income clients. Family Alternatives has provided parenting skills and services to 281 teens and parents. I 00 '<:ji I Provide new clothing to 240 low- and very- low-income school children. Due to decreased funding the goal was lowered to 130. Provided new clothing to 13 8 children. Jolm's Closet has provided clothing to 517 children A. Priority: Provide core public services activities to improve the quality of life for low-income including those at risk of becoming homeless and special needs groups continued.. individuals and families, 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco . area. Funded ADA upgrade to the bathroom at the Grand Ave Library. Provided funding for the renovation of the CORA shelter. Part of this renovation will create an ADA apartment. Currently, there are no facilities serving disabled survivors of domestic violence. . . . . Public Facilities (Non- Housing 2 I) Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Various public facility renovations may be funded out of the existing allocations for city-sponsored housing or commercial rehabilitation programs. . Funded the purchase and installation of ADA approved playground equipment in a low- income census block . Families on Track acquired and installed a modular unit, expanding the existing facility at 825 Parkway. Served 218 households. Funded ADA improvements at the Orange Library, including: removal of stairs, installation of accessible ramps and retrofitting the elevator with Braille instructions. Funded ADA improvements at Orange Memorial Park, including: purchasing accessible water fountains. Funded the purchase and installation of ADA approved playground equipment in a low-income census block area. Funded ADA upgrade to the bathroom at the Grand Ave Library. Provided funding for the renovation of the CORA shelter. Part of this renovation will create an ADA apartment. Currently, there are no facilities serving disabled survivors of domestic violence. Page 14 of 15 I 0\ ~ I . . c. Preserve and improve public facilities that serve a high percentage of low-income residents. 2005-2006 CAPER City of South San Francisco Page 15 of 15 Project Sentinel (Other Objectives 1.0) La Raza Centro Legal (Other Objectives 1.0) Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housing. Provide 400 low-income individuals with services including information and referral, legal advice and counseling, and legal representation. Provided legal advice, information and counseling to 220 individuals. La Raza Centro Legal has provided legal advice, information and counseling to 1,176 individuals. Accessibility for the purpose of creating decent affordable housin Provide fair housing counseling and advocacy casework to 8~1210w-income households and respond to approximately 100 telephone inquiries from residents requesting fair housing information. management for 9 households and responded to 42 phone inquiries. Project Sentinel has provided case management 38 households and responded to 298 phone inquiries. Section VI. Fair Housing Lead-based paint abatement procedures (Other Objectives 2.0) Sustainability for the purpose of creating suitable living environments. Continue to apply federal d paint regulations in all housing and commercial rehabilitation projects to reduce lead-based paint hazards. Collaborate with the County of San Mateo and other county jurisdictions to coordinate educational effOlts. Continued to collaborate with the County of San Mateo and other jurisdictions in the cOlmty to implement new federal lead-based paint regulations for housing. Actions included offering training to contractors, performing outreach, and cooperating and sharing information with other entitlement iurisdictions. Have applied federal lead-based paint regulations to reduce lead-based paint hazards. Have collaborated with the County of San Mateo and other county jurisdictions to coordinate educational efforts. Actions included offering training to contractors, performing outreach, and cooperating and sharing information with other entitlement jurisdictions. I o L() I Section V. Lead-Based Paint Abatement TABLE 2 Summary of Housing Accomplishments Grantee: City of South San Francisco State: California Program Year: 2005-2006 Priority Need Category Actual Units Renters 0- 30% ofMFI 147 31-50% ofMFI 30 51-80% of MFI 13 Total 190 Owners 0-30% ofMFI 23 31-50% ofMFI 15 51-80% of MFI 6 80-120% ofMFI 3 Total 47 Homeless* Total Individuals 130 Non-Homeless Special Needs Total 41 Total Housing 408 * Homeless families and individuals assisted with transitional and permanent housing Total Housing 408 American Indian/Alaska 3 American Indian/Alaska & white 1 Asian 32 AsianlWhite 4 Black/African American 31 Black AA & White 1 Native Hawaiian/Other PA 11 White 148 Other 25 Hispanic White 37 Hispanic Black/African American 1 Hispanic Other 114 Total RaciallEthnic 408 -51- Appendices -52- Funding Allocations for 2005-2006 Financial Summary IDIS PR03 Report IDIS PR023 Report IDIS PR06 Report City Council Resolution Ci/v Council Fundinl! Allocations for 2005-2006 Public Services: Child Care Coordinating Council City Sponsored Child Care Friends to Parents SSFUSD Children's Center City-Sponsored Adult Day Care Second Harvest Food Bank Ombudsman Program of San Mateo County North Pen. Neighborhood Svcs Center (NPNSC) The Tooth Mobile Project READ Communities Overcoming Relationship Violence Rape Trauma Services ELLIPSE Peninsula Aids Program P ARCA Support Services Program John's Closet North Peninsula Family Alternatives Rehabilitation Activities: C.LD. Housing Access Rebuilding Together Peninsula City-Sponsored Housing Rehabilitation City-Sponsored Commercial Rehabilitation CDBG Program Administration TOTAL CDBG Funds Additional Projects Funded with Non-CDBG Funds: HOME Program Activities: La Raza Centro Legal Project Sentinel Total HOME Program Activities Redevelopment Program Activities: Human Investment Project Shelter Network- Crossroads Shelter Network - Maple Street Samaritan House - Safe Harbor Sitike Counseling Center La Raza Centro Legal Total Redevelopment Program Activities *Inc1uded in this amount is as follows: CDBG Entitlement for 05-06 CDBG Program Income $686,877 $ 95,000 Updated -4/26/05 -53- $4,000 10,000 4,000 2,000 19,000 4,000 1,700 24,000 14,000 6,000 4,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 8,000 15,000 8,500 310,802 175,000 155,875 781,877 * 14,475 3.525 18,000 22,500 18,000 7,500 7,000 10,300 5.000 70,300 PR26 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDSG FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES 1 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 2 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 3 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 4 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 5 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 6 RETURNS 7 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 8 TOTAL AVArLABlE (SUM, LINES 01-07) PART 1/: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES 9 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14) 16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15) PART III: lOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD 17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING 19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20) 22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/L1NE 11) lOW/MOD BEBENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS 23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION PY 24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/L1NE 24) PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS 27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34) 36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31/UNE 35) -54- DATE: 09-13-06 TIME: 12:50 PAGE: 1 $841,756.83 $686,877.00 $0.00 $0.00 $140,337.73 $0.00 $0.00 $1,668,971.56 $785,282.04 $0.00 $785,282.04 $165,443.00 $0.00 $0.00 $950,725.04 $718,246.52 $0.00 $0.00 $785,282.04 $0.00 $785,282.04 100.00% PY PY $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $116,595.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $116,595.37 $686,877.00 $107,315.00 $0.00 $794,192.00 14.68% IDIS - C04PR2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE: 09-13-06 TIME: 12:50 PAGE: 2 PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP 37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +L1NE 40) 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44) 46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PAACTIVITIES (LINE 41/L1NE 45) $165,443.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $165,443.00 $686,877.00 $140,337.73 $0.00 $827,214.73 20.00% NOTE: Line 5 Total Program Income includes $29,503.86. PI receipt #0196433 posted on August 21. This Program Income was receipted in PY2005. -55- IDIS C04PR03 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 1 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA PGM YEAR: 1994 PROJECT: 0002 - CONVERTED CDBG ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY: 2 - CDBG COMMITTED FUNDS ADJUSTMENT MATRIX CODE: REG CITATION NATIONAL OBJ: STATUS: FUNDS BUDGETED LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: WHITE: 0 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 3,749,421.46 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 3,749,421.46 ASIAN: 0 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 3,749,421.46 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM: 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW: 0 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 TOT MOD: 0 HISPANIC: 0 0 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 0 0 TOTAL: 0 PERCENT LOW / MOD: 0.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED: 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THIS ACTIVITY ARE REPORTED AT ANOTHER ACTIVITY. TOTAL: 0 0 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: ***** EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 0001 - CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL ACTIVITY: 227 - CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL MATRIX CODE: oSL REG CITATION: 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 09-30-05 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 700 SOUTH CLAREMONT STREET SUITE 107 RESPITE CHILDCARE PROGRAM PROVIDING REFERRALS AND SUBSIDIES FOR LOW INCOME SAN MATEO.CA 94402 FAMILIES IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS I \0 If) I ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATION SPENT IN PY05-06 EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** PGM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 0022 - FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS ASSISTANCE ACTIVITY: 248 - 1ST TIME HOMEBUYERS ASSISTANCE PGM MATRIX CODE 13 REG CITATION: 570.201(N) NATIONAL OBJ: LMH STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: CITYWIDE FIRST TINME HOMBUYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-21-05 WHITE: 1 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 201,185.57 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 201,185.57 ASIAN: 4 0 IDIS C04PR03 FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE 03-07-05 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 5,000.00 FUNDED AMOUNT: 5,000.00 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 5,000.00 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 94.17 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED: TOTAL TOT EXTREMELY LOW: 0 TOT LOW: 6 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 6 PERCENT LOW / MOD: 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED: 3 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE ( GENERAL 2005 01 PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL TOTAL WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: PROPOSED UNITS 5 o 5 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL AM TOTAL # 6 o o o o o o o o o 6 ACTUAL UNITS 6 o 6 #HISPANIC 1 o o o o o o o o o 1 I t-... Lf) I U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 2 PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 700 SOUTH CLAREMONT SAN MATEO,CA 94402 FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR 3 03-28-05 3,801.20 3,801.20 0.00 801.20 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN TOTAL # 2 o o o o #HISPANIC o o o o o DESCRIPTION: RESPITE CHILDCARE PROGRAM PROVIDING REFERRALS AND SUBSIDIES FOR LOW-INCOME FAMILIES IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS 2005 0001 249 - COMPLETED STREET CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL 06-30-06 SUITE 107 MATRIX CODE 05L REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** THIS ACTIVITY WILL BE CLOSED AND THE FUND BALANCE OF $96,168.32 RE- CAPTURED. A NEW ACTIVITY WILL BE CREATED FOR THE FIRST TIME HOME- BUYER PROGRAM FOR PY2006. FIVE HOUSEHOLDS SERVED TOTAL. UNABLE TO UPDATE ACCOMPLISHMENT DATA FOR PY2004 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 04 - HOUSEHOLDS 2005 04 HOUSEHOLDS TOTAL GENERAL GENERAL PROPOSED UNITS 3 2 5 ACTUAL TYPE 04 - HOUSEHOLDS 04 HOUSEHOLDS GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 2 2 I 00 If) I TOTAL FEMALE HEADED TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD: TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / MOD 201 101 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED OWNER o o 2 o 2 100_00 2 RENTER o o o o o 0.00 TOTAL o o 6 o 6 100.00 TOTAL UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 0.00 185.57 185.57 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: o o o o o o 1 o 6 o o o o o o o o o IDIS C04PR03 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM COBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 3 IDIS C04PR03 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 4 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DRAWN IN PGM YR 3,801.20 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM: 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW: 0 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 2 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 2 0 TOTAL: 2 PERCENT LOW / MOD: 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED: 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 4 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 2 TOTAL: 4 2 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: SEVERAL CLIENTS APPLIED FOR RESPITE CHILD CARE SERVICES, BUT ONLY TWO FAMILIES FOLLOWED THROUGH AND RECEIVED THE FUNDS. THE GRANT WAS SLIGHTLY PRORATED. THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN FUNDED IN PY 2006. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJEC'l' : 0002 - CITY-SPONSORED CHILD CARE ACTIVITY: 250 - CITY-SPONSORED CHILD CARED MATRIX CODE: 05L REG CITATION: 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 601 SPRUCE STREET PROGRAM AUGMENTS EXISTING CENTER BASED CHILD CARE SERVICES OFFERED BY PROVIDING SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 SUBSIDY TO LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME FAMILIES TO ASSIST WITH THE MONTHLY FEES FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 8 4 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 10,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 10,000.00 ASIAN: 3 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR 10,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER 1 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 10.000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 I 0\ 11) I IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 5 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM: 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW: 6 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 5 TOT MOD: 1 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 12 4 TOTAL: 12 PERCENT LOW / MOD: 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED: 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 15 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 12 TOTAL: 15 12 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: THE COST OF CHILDCARE HAS INCREASED AND THE CENTER WAS ONLY ABLE TO PROVIDE STIPENDS TO 12 LOW-INCOME CHILDREN. HOWEVER THE STIPENDS CREATED A DEEPER AFFORDABILITY FOR THE CLIENTS RECEIVING THE STIPENDS THE GOAL FOR PY 2006 HAS BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT INCREASED COSTS. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0003 - FRIENDS TO PARENTS ACTIVITY: 251 - FRIENDS TO PARENTS 11ATRIX CODE: 05L REG CITATION: 570.201 (E) NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 2525 WEXFORD AVENUE ON GOING DAY CARE SERVICES IN CENTER-BASED FACILITY FOR INFANTS AND SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN. PROVIDES SUBHSIDIES TO LOW INCOME FAMILIES TO ASSIST WITH MONTHLY COSTS OF PROGRAM. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 8 2 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 4,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 2 1 FUNDED AMOUNT: 4,000.00 ASIAN: 12 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 1 1 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 4,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER 0 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 4,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE 16 16 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE 0 0 I o \0 I IDIS C04PR03 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 6 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM: 1 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 32 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 1 1 TOT LOW: 3 TOT MOD: 6 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 41 21 TOTAL: 41 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 31 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 41 TOTAL: 31 41 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: DUE TO DECREASED FUNDING FROM THEIR REQUEST, THE GOAL FOR THIS PROGRAM WAS TO SERVE 31 LOW-INCOME CHILDREN. FRIENDS TO PARENTS EXCEEDED THIS GOAL. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0004 - SSFUSD CHILDREN'S CENTER ACTIVITY: 252 - SSFUSD CHILDREN'S CENTER MATRIX CODE: 05L REG CITATION: 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 530 TAMARACK LANE CHILD CARE PROGRAM FOR LOW-INCOME PARENTS. CDBG FUNDS PROVIDES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 TRANSPORTATION, SNACKS, AND ADMISSION FEES FOR FIELD TRIPS ORGANIZED FOR THE CHILDREN. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 62 57 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 2,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 4 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 2,000.00 ASIAN: 29 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 2,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 44 42 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 2,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 1 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 82 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 91 83 I t-I \0 I IDIS C04PR03 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 7 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPRJ FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOT LOW: 77 TOT MOD: 72 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL: 231 182 TOTAL: 231 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 165 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 231 TOTAL: 165 231 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: THIS PROGRAM PROVIDED LOW-INCOME CHILDREN WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO ON FIELD TRIPS WHILE ATTENDING SUMMER DAY CARE. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0005 - CITY SPONSORED ADULT DAY CARE ACTIVITY: 253 - CITY SPONSORED ADULT DAY CARE MATRIX CODE: 05A REG CITATION 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 601 GRAND AVENUE PROGRAM OFFERS DAY CARE SERVICES TO FRAIL, CHRONICALLY IMPAIRED AND ELDERLY SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 SENIORS INCLUDING SOCIAL, EDUCATIONAL, & RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. HOT LUNCH & SNACKS ARE PROVIDED. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 25 5 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 19,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 19,000.00 ASIAN: 7 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR; 19,000_00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 19,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 32 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD 0 TOTAL 32 5 I N 1.0 I 113 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL 435 o o o TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 601 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 4 4 03-28-05 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 000.00 000.00 CA 94080 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 435 AM 5 138 5 21 1 o 1 o 101 o o o 1 o o 1 o 75 DESCRIPTION FOOD BANK PROVIDES WEEKLY GROCERY BAGS FOOD, BREAD, PASTA, SEASONAL ITEMS, AND SENIORS CONTAINING STAPLES, CANNED FRUIT TO LOW-INCOME SENIORS TOTAL # #HISPANIC 163 36 2005 0006 SECOND HARVEST 254 - SECOND HARVEST COMPLETED 06-30-06 TO FOOD BANK FOOD BANK MATRIX CODE 05A REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC I (() \D I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** THE REVISED GOAL OF THIS PROGRAM WAS TO SERVE 35 LOW-INCOME DISABLED SENIORS WHO REQUIRE FULL-TIME DAY CARE. THIS PROGRAM PROVIDES SOCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR ITS PARTICIPANTS AS WELL AS RESPITE FOR THEIR CARE- TAKERS. IT IS AN EXTREMELY VALUABLE PROGRAM AVAILABLE TO THE NEEDIEST RESIDENTS OF SSF ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL: PROPOSED UNITS o 35 35 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 32 32 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o TOTAL: PERCENT LOW !DIS C04PR03 / MOD 32 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 8 IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 9 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL: 435 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 260 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 435 TOTAL: 260 435 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: PROGRAM PROVIDES A WEEKLY BAG OF GROCERIES FOR SENIORS IN SSF. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0007 - OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM OF SAN MATEO COUNTY ACTIVITY: 255 - OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM OF SAN MATEO COUNTY MATRIX CODE: 05A REG CITATION: 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 300 PIEDMONT AVENUE, SUITE 425 PROVIDES MONITORING OF ADULT-CARE FACILITIES & REPORTING OF ABUSES AND SAN BRUNO,CA 94066 NEGLIENCE. FINANCING: TOTAL II IIHISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 43 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 1,700.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 4 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 1,700.00 ASIAN: 2 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 1,700.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: L 700.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 0 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 TOT MOD: 49 TOT NON LOW MOD 0 TOTAL 49 0 TOTAL: 49 I "<Ii \0 I TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL: TOTAL 2,029 358 o o 2,387 TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED FINANCING INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR 03-28-05 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 2 387 o o o 116 WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM TOTAL 1I 1,908 202 50 5 106 o lIHISPANIC 1,409 o o o o o o o o 116 1,525 PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 600 LINDEN AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 DESCRIPTION: CORE SERVICE AGENCY FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. PROVIDES A MYRIAD OF SOCIAL SERVICES INCLUDING EMERGENCY FOOD, CRISIS COUNSELING, HOUSING ASSISTANCE, AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES - NEIGHBORHOOD - NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLETED 06-30-06 2005 0008 256 SERVICES CENTER SERVICES CENTER NPNSC NPNSC MATRIX CODE 05 REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC I Ln \D I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL PROVIDED ADVOCACY TO 49 SENIORS RESIDING IN LONG-TERM PROPOSED UNITS o 30 30 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 PEOPLE CARE FACILITIES GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 49 49 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o PERCENT LOW / MOD IDIS C04PR03 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 10 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL o 341 83 o TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: CITYWIDE 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 14 14 03-28-05 14,000.00 14,000.00 0.00 000.00 000.00 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 424 TOTAL # 292 49 37 o o o 5 7 o 34 #HISPANIC 232 o o o o o o o o o 232 CA 94080 DESCRIPTION: FULLLY EQUIPPED DENTAL OFFICE IN A MOBILE TRAILER WORKS WITH FAMILLIES ON TRACK PROGRAM TO PROVIDE DENTAL CARE TO THE FOOD PARTICIPANTS ON SITE 2005 0009 - THE TOOTH MOBILE 257 - THE TOOTH MOBILE COMPLETED 06-30-06 MATRIX CODE 05M REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC I \0 \0 I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** THIS IS THE CORE SERVICE AGENCY FOR SSF, PROVIDING MUCH NEEDED SERVICE AND HELPING TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS o 2,000 2,000 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 2,387 2,387 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o PERCENT LOW / IDIS C04PR03 MOD 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 11 IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 12 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL: 424 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 300 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 424 TOTAL: 300 424 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: WORKED WITH LOCAL SCHOOLS TO PROVIDE FREE DENTAL SERVICES TO LOW- INCOME CHILDREN. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0010 - PROJECT READ - WEST ORANGE LIBRARY ACTIVITY: 258 - PROJECT READ - WEST ORANGE LIBRARY MATRIX CODE: 05 REG CITATION 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 840 WEST ORANGE AVENUE PROJECT PROVIDES TUTORS TO TEACH PEOPLE 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER HOW TO READ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 AND WRITE. THE PROGRAM TRAINS PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY TO BE TUTORS FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 31 20 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 6,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 9 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 6,000.00 ASIAN: 13 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 6,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 2 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 6.000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 52 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 1 0 TOT LOW: 1 TOT MOD: 3 TOT NON LOW MOD 0 TOTAL 56 20 I t--.. ~ I IDIS C04PR03 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 13 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL: 56 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 40 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 56 TOTAL: 40 56 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: PROVIDES TUTORING IN LITERACY FOR LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF SSF. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0011 - CORA (COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING RELATIONSHIP ABUSE) ACTIVITY: 259 - CORA MATRIX CODE: 05G REG CITATION 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: P.O. BOX 5090 RESIDENTIAL SHELTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVORS & THEIR CHILDREN INCLUDING SAN MATEO,CA 94402 AN ARRAY OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO ASSIST WITH THEIR TRANSITION TO LIVING INDEPENDEN'I'LY. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 0 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 4,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 12 5 FUNDED AMOUNT: 4,000.00 ASIAN: 0 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 4,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 3 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 4,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 15 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD 0 TOTAL 15 5 I 00 1.0 I TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL 87 141 160 57 TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED STATUS: LOCATION: 1860 EL CAMINO REAL, BURLINGAME,CA 94080 FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR 5 5 03-28-05 5,000_00 5,000.00 0.00 000.00 000.00 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM. INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSAULT SURVIVORS TOTAL # #HISPANIC 157 40 19 0 87 0 2 0 41 0 o 0 2 0 8 0 o 0 129 0 445 40 WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM DESCRIPTION: THIS IS THE ONLY COUNTY AGENCY PROVIDING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR SEXUAL PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY SUITE 302 2005 0012 - RAPE TRAUMA 260 - RAPE TRAUMA COMPLETED 06-30-06 SERVICES CENTER SERVICES CENTER MATRIX CODE 05 REG CITATION 570.201 E COUNSELING NATIONAL OBJ SERVICES LMC I 0\ \0 I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** SERVICE ENRICHED SHELTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ESCAPING AN ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS o 7 7 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 15 15 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o TOTAL: PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 15 100.00 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 14 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL 15 1 o o TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 173 SOUTH BLVD. SAN MATEO,CA 94080 03-28-05 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM. INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM # 10 2 1 o o o 3 o o o 16 #HISPANIC 4 o o o o o o o o o 4 TOTAL DESCRIPTION: PROVIDES IN HOME SUPPORT SERVICES TO PERSONS DIAGNOSED AS HIV POSITIVE INCLUDING COUNSELING, EMERGENCY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, HOUSING ASSISTANCE, AND SUPPORT FOR FAMILY MEMBERS 2005 0013 ELLIPSE PENINSULA AIDS 261 - ELLIPSE PENINSULA AIDS COMPLETED 06-30-06 SERVICES SERVICES MATRIX CODE 03T REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC I o t--.. I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE 2005 01 - PEOPLE TOTAL COUNSELING AND ADVOCACY SERVICES FOR SUVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT GENERAL GENERAL PROPOSED UNITS o 340 340 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 445 445 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / IDIS C04PR03 MOD 445 87.10 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 15 IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBU~SEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 16 COBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL: 16 PERCENT LOW / MOD 100.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 0 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 15 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL) 16 TOTAL: 15 16 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: ***** EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0014 - PARCA SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM ACTIVITY: 262 - PARCA SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM MATRIX CODE: 05 REG CITATION 570.201(E NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 1750 EL CAMINO REAL, #105 PROVIDES SUPPORT, INFORMATION, REFERRALS, OUTREACH, OUTREACH, ADVOCACY, AND BURLINGAME,CA 94010 RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AND THEIR FAMILIES. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 17 8 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 4,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 4,000.00 ASIAN: 3 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 4,000.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 3 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 4,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 1 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 14 TOT MOD: 3 TOT NON LOW MOD 5 TOTAL 23 8 I ,..-l '" I NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED TOT EXTREMELY LOW: TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL: TOTAL 138 o o o 138 TOTAL FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 3 3 03-28-05 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 000.00 000_00 PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 700 STEWART DALY CITY,CA FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 138 TOTAL # 8 2 10 1 7 o o 3 o 107 #HISPANIC 7 o o o o o o 3 o 104 114 STREET 94015 DESCRIPTION: PROVIDES NEW CLOTHING TO LOW-INCOME SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN OF STRATEGY AREA 2005 0015 JOHN'S CLOSET 263 - JOHN'S CLOSET COMPLETED 06-30-06 MATRIX CODE 05 REG CITATION 570.201 E THE NEIGHBORHOOD NATIONAL OBJ LMC I N t-... I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL 18 LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS WERE PROPOSED SERVED UNITS o 5 5 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 23 23 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o TOTAL: PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 23 78.20 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 17 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL: TOTAL 74 o o o 74 TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONS FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: ASSISTED 03-28-05 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 74 WHITE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN # o o o o o o o o o 74 #HISPANIC o o o o o o o o o 74 74 PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 501 SPRUCE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 TOTAL DESCRIPTION: COUNSELING SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME PARENTS & YOUTH ON ISSUES OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE, SUBSTANCES ABUSE, GANG ACTIVITIES, & REFERRALS TO SOCIAL SERVICES AS NEEDED NORTH PENINSULA FAMILY - NORTH PENINSULA FAMILY COMPLETED 06-30-06 2005 0016 264 ALTERNATIVES (NPFA ALTERNATIVES-NPFA MATRIX CODE 05 REG CITATION 570.201 E NATIONAL OBJ LMC I (f) t--.. I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL: PROVIDES FREE SCHOOL CLOTHING TO LOW-INCOME CHILDREN PROPOSED UNITS o 130 130 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 138 138 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 18 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD: TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / MOD 26 100.00 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED OWNER 21 5 o o RENTER o o o o o 0.00 5 o o TOTAL 26 100.00 PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: 875 O'NEIL BELMONT,CA FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 17 17 03-28-05 17,108_20 17,108.20 0.00 108_20 108.20 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE 21 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: FOR LOW-INCOME PEOPLE TO ENABLE DISABLED A SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE ENVIRONMENT TOTAL # #HISPANIC 20 6 1 0 2 0 o 0 2 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 1 0 o 0 WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 26 6 DESCRIPTION: HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY MODIFICATIONS RESIDENTS TO STAY IN THEIR HOMES IN 94002 2005 0017 - C_I.D. HOUSING ACCESS 265 - C.I.D. HOUSING ACCESS COMPLETED 06-30-06 MATRIX CODE 14A REG CITATION 570.202 NATIONAL OBJ LMH I '<ti t--- I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL PROVIDES COUNSELING AND PARENTING SKILLS COACHING FOR FAMILIES PROPOSED UNITS o 60 60 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE 01 - PEOPLE GENERAL GENERAL ACTUAL UNITS o 74 74 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 19 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED OWNER 6 o o o RENTER o o o o TOTAL 6 o o o TOTAL WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: COMMUNITY WIDE 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR 8 8 03-28-05 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 ISLANDER & WHITE WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN TOTAL It 6 o o o o o o o o o o ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 6 ItHISPANIC 1 o o o o o o o o o o 1 CA 94080 DESCRIPTION: REHABILITATE HOMES OF LOW-INCOME HOME OWNERS USING ALL VOLLUNTEER LABOR INCLUDING REPAIRS OF PLLUMBING, ROOFS ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, HEATING SYSTEMS DISABLED ACCESS MODIFICATIONS LMH & 2005 0018 - REBUILDING TOGETHER PENINSULA 266 - REBUILDING TOGETHER PENINSULA COMPLETED 06-30-06 MATRIX CODE 14A REG CITATION 570.202 NATIONAL OBJ I L() '" I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ORIGINAL BUDGET $15,000 ADDED $2050.98 THAT WAS RECAPTURED FROM PY04-05 CID ACT 1t243. ADDED $57.22 FROM PI TO FUND FINAL EXPENDITURES CID FELL SHORT OF THEIR GOAL FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE CITY HAS BEEN FUNDING THEM. THE REASON FOR THE SHORTFALL WAS THAT THE CITY CHANGED THE PAPERWORK AND REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVING THE PROJECTS. WE ARE ONLINE FOR PY06-07 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE REPORT YEAR 2004 2005 TOTAL: ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: PROPOSED TYPE 10 - HOUSING UNITS 10 - HOUSING UNITS PROPOSED UNITS o 30 30 ACTUAL TYPE 10 - HOUSING UNITS 10 HOUSING UNITS ACTUAL UNITS o 26 26 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED IDIS C04PR03 12 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 20 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ASSISTED OWNER 17 15 4 o RENTER o o o o TOTAL 17 15 4 o TOTAL PGM YEAR PROJECT: CITY-SPONSORED HOUSING REHABILITATION ACTIVITY - CITY-SPONSORED HOUSING REHABILITATION STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: COMMUNITY WIDE 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR 338 338 03-28-05 338,978.08 338,978.08 0.00 978.08 978.08 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 36 # 18 5 5 o o o 1 o o 7 o 10 o o o 7 o #HISPANIC 2 1 o o o o CA 94080 TOTAL DESCRIPTION: PROGRAM OFFERS A VARIETY OF REHAB SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY, INCLUDING LOW-INTERESST LOANS FOR HOMEOWNERS TO BRING THEIR HOUSING UNIT UP TO CODE INCLUDE ACQUISITION MAY 2005 0019 267 MATRIX CODE 14A REG CITATION 570.202 NATIONAL OBJ LMH I \0 t-... I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** REBUILDING TOGETHER USES VOLUNTEER LABOR TO TO LOW-INCOME FAMILIES, ELDERLY AND DISABLED ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 10 - HOUSING UNITS 2005 10 - HOUSING UNITS TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS o 5 5 PROVIDE FREE HOME REPAIRS ACTUAL TYPE 10 - HOUSING UNITS 10 - HOUSING UNITS ACTUAL UNITS o 6 6 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 6 TOTAL: PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 6 100.00 o 0.00 6 100.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 21 TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD TOTAL o o o o TOTAL PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION: HISTORIC DOWNTOWN DISTRICT 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: NUMBER OF ASSISTED 142 142 03-28-05 142,923.39 142,923.39 0.00 923.39 923.39 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM TOTAL # o o o o o o o o o o o #HISPANIC o o o o o o o o o o o CA 94080 DESCRIPTION: COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION PROGRAM ASSISSTS PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN DISTRICT WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO THEIR PROPERTY INCLUDING FACADE & STRUCTURAL UNDERTAKINGS CITY-SPONSORED COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION - CITY-SPONSORED COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION COMPLETED 06-30-06 2005 0020 268 MATRIX CODE 14E REG CITATION 570.202 NATIONAL OBJ LMA I t.... t.... I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2004 10 - HOUSING UNITS 2005 10 - HOUSING UNITS TOTAL ***** PROPOSED UNITS o 37 37 ACTUAL TYPE 10 - HOUSING UNITS 10 HOUSING UNITS ACTUAL UNITS o 36 36 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 3 TOTAL: PERCENT LOW IDIS C04PR03 / MOD 36 100.00 o 0.00 36 100.00 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 22 IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 23 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL: 0 PERCENT LOW / MOD 0.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2004 08 - BUSINESSES 0 08 - BUSINESSES 0 2005 08 - BUSINESSES 5 08 - BUSINESSES 8 TOTAL: 5 8 CENSUS TRACT PERCENT LOW / MOD: 60.00 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: ***** EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0021 - CDBG PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITY: 269 - CDBG PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION MATRIX CODE: 21A REG CITATION 570.206 NATIONAL OBJ: STATUS: COMPLETED 06-30-06 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 400 GRAND AVENUE FISCAL & PROGRAMATIC MANAGEMENT OF THE CDBG PROGRAM WHICH INCLUDES SOCIAL SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 SERVICES, HOUSING & COMMERCIAL REHAB, & PREPARATION OF FEDERAL REPORTS & DOCfiHENTS. FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 03-28-05 WHITE: 0 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 165,443.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 165,443.00 ASIAN: 0 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR 165,443.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 DRAWN IN E'GM YR: 165,443.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW 0 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD 0 TOTAL 0 0 I 00 '" I NUMBER OF ASSISTED TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD: TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / MOD TOTAL o o o o o 0.00 TOTAL PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY: STATUS: LOCATION: GARDINER & RANDOLPH SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED AMOUNT: UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS DRAWN THRU PGM YR DRAWN IN PGM YR: 26 26 12-02-05 26,916.43 26,916.43 0.00 916.43 916.43 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM o # o o o o o o o o o o #HISPANIC o o o o o o o o o o o TOTAL CA - ADA MODIFICATIONS - GARDINER PARK PLAY COMPLETED 06-30-06 2005 0022 272 94080 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE AND MATRIX CODE INSTALL ADA ACCESSIBLE PLAY STRUCTURE 03F REG CITATION 570.201 C NATIONAL OBJ LMA I 0'\ ~ I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2005 TOTAL: ***** PROPOSED UNITS o o ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS o o TOTAL FEMALE HEADED o TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / MOD IDIS C04PR03 o 0.00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 24 IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-19-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 13:02 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 25 CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED UNITS ACTUAL TYPE ACTUAL UNITS 2005 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 TOTAL: 1 1 CENSUS TRACT PERCENT LOW / MOD: 72.10 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE: FURNISH AND INSTALL ADA APPROVED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IN A LOW-INCOME NEIGHBORHOOD. EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE: ***** PGM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 0023 - PUBLIC FACILITY REHABILITATION ACTIVITY: 273 - CORA ADA MODIFICATION MATRIX CODE: 03 REG CITATION: 570.201(C) NATIONAL OBJ: LMC STATUS: UNDERWAY LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY WIDE ADA MODIFICATIONS TO CORA'S (COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING RELATIONSHIP ABUSE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ,CA 94080 SHELTER FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FINANCING: TOTAL # #HISPANIC INITIAL FUNDING DATE: 05-18-06 WHITE: 0 0 ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: 20,000.00 BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN: 0 0 FUNDED AMOUNT: 20,000.00 ASIAN: 0 0 UNLIQ OBLIGATIONS: 0.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: 0 0 DRAWN THRU PGM YR: 14,675.00 NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0 0 DRAWN IN PGM YR: 14.675.00 AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE: 0 0 ASIAN & WHITE: 0 0 NUMBER OF PERSONS ASSISTED BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: 0 0 TOTAL AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM 0 0 TOT EXTREMELY LOW: 0 OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: 0 0 TOT LOW: 0 TOT MOD: 0 TOT NON LOW MOD: 0 TOTAL 0 0 TOTAL: 0 PERCENT LOW / MOD: 0.00 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED 0 I o 00 I EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE TOTAL: CENSUS TRACT PERCENT LOW ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2005 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES / RENOVATED LIBRARY BATHROOM TO MOD 68.10 MAKE PROPOSED UNITS 1 1 IT ADA COMPLIANT ACTUAL TYPE 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES ACTUAL UNITS 1 1 TOTAL FEMALE HEADED TOT EXTREMELY LOW TOT LOW: TOT MOD: TOT NON LOW MOD: TOTAL: PERCENT LOW / MOD o TOTAL o o o o o 0.00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSISTED GRAND AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FINANCING: INITIAL FUNDING DATE ACTIVITY ESTIMATE: FUNDED UNLIQ DRAWN DRAWN AMOUNT: OBLIGATIONS THRU PGM YR IN PGM YR: WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: o 06-06-06 18,400.00 18,400.00 0.00 18,400.00 18,400.00 WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM AMERICAN # o o o o o o o o o o #HISPANIC o o o o o o o o o o o TOTAL I .-l 00 I CA 94080 COMPLETED ADA UPGRADE TO DOWNTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY PGM YEAR PROJECT: ACTIVITY STATUS: LOCATION DESCRIPTION ADA MODIFICATIONS - GRAND AVE LIBRARY BATHROOM ADA MOD COMPLETED 06-30-06 2005 0022 293 MATRIX CODE 03 REG CITATION 570.201 C NATIONAL OBJ LMA EXTENDED ACTIVITY NARRATIVE ***** THE SHELTER RENOVATION WAS STARTED PROGRAM YEAR 2006 ACCOMPLISHMENT NARRATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY YEAR: REPORT YEAR PROPOSED TYPE 2005 01 - PEOPLE (GENERAL TOTAL IN PY 2005 PROPOSED UNITS 8 8 ACTUAL TYPE 01 - PEOPLE AND WILL BE COMPLETED GENERAL IN ACTUAL UNITS o o IDIS C04PR03 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 26 I N 00 I IDIS C04PR03 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (GPR) FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2005 07-01-2005 TO 06-30-2006 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOTAL ACTIVITY ESTIMATE 5,552,842.33 TOTAL FUNDED AMOUNT 5,551,842.33 TOTAL AMOUNT DRAWN THRU PGM YR 4,805,052.33 TOTAL AMOUNT DRAWN IN PGM YR 950,725.04 DATE TIME PAGE 09-19-06 13:02 27 PUBLIC FACILITIES/IMPROVEMENTS Public Facilities and Improvements General Senior Centers (03A) Centers for the Disabled/Handicapped (03B Homeless Facilities - Not Operating Costs 03C 03 2 1 o o o 14 0.00 675.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 1 o o o 465,771.85 18,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 o o o 33,075.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HOUSING Loss of Rental Income (09) Construction of Housing (12 Direct Homeownership Assistance (13) Rehab: Single-Unit Residential (14A) Rehab: Multi-Unit Residential (14B) Public Housing Modernization (14C) Rehab: Other Publicly Owned Residential Buildings Energy Efficiency Improvements (14F) Acquisition for Rehab (14G) Rehab Administration (14H) Lead-Based Paint/Lead Hazard Test/Abatement (141 Code Enforcement (15) Residential Historic Preservation (16A) CDBG Operation and Repair of Foreclosed Property 19E 14D o o o 2 o o o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o o 1 3 o o o o o o o o o o 101 364 0.00 0.00 185.57 586.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 o o 1 5 o o o o o o o o o o 465 0.00 0.00 101,185.57 364,586.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 771 85 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Rehab: Publicly/Privately Owned C/I (14E C/I Land Acquisition/Disposition (17A) C/I Infrastructure Development (17B) C/I Building Acquisition, Construction, Rehab Other C/I Improvements (17D) ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Profits ED Direct Technical Assistance (18B Micro-Enterprise Assistance (18C) 17C l8A o o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1 o o o o o o o 142 142,923.39 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 923.39 1 1 o o o o o o o 142,923.39 142,923.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I (1) 00 I ACQUISITION/PROPERTY-RELATED Acquisition (01) Disposition (02) Clearance and Demolition (04) Cleanup of Contaminated Sites/Brownfields Relocation (08 04A o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o PROGRAM COUNT o o o o o 0.00 YEAR TOTAL $ DISBURSED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNDERWAY ACTIVITIES COUNT $ DISBURSED COMPLETED ACTIVITIES COUNT DISBURSED $ COUNT OF CDBG ACTIVITIES WITH DISBURSEMENTS BY ACTIVITY GROUP IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA & MATRIX CODE DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES/IMPROVEMENTS (continued) Youth Centers/Facilities (03D) Neighborhood Facilities (03E) Parks and Recreational Facilities (03F) Parking Facilities (03G) Solid Waste Disposal Facilities (03H) Flood and Drainage Facilities (031) Water/Sewer Improvements (03J) Street Improvements (03K) Sidewalks (03L) Child Care Centers/Facilities for Children 03M Tree Planting (03N) Fire Stations/Equipment (030) Health Facilities (03P) Facilities for Abused and Neglected Children (03Q) Asbestos Removal (03R) Facilities for AIDS Patients - Not Operating Costs (035 Removal of Architectural Barriers (10) Non-Residential Historic Preservation (16B) PUBLIC SERVICES Operating Costs of Homeless/AIDS Patients Programs (03T Public Services - General (05) Senior Services (05A) Services for the Disabled (05B) Legal Services (05C) Youth Services (05D) Transportation Services (05E) Substance Abuse Services (OSF) Battered and Abused Spouses (05G) Employment Training (OSH) Crime Awareness/Prevention (051) Fair Housing Activities (05J) Tenant/Landlord Counseling (05K) Child Care Services (05L) Health Services (05M) Abused and Neglected Children (05N) Mental Health Services (050) Screening for Lead-Based Paint/Hazards/poisoning 05P Subsistence Payments 05Q o 4 3 1 o 1 o o 1 o o o o 4 1 o o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 675_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 6 3 o o o o o 1 o o o o 4 1 o o o o 2 o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 26,916.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- 45,316.43 4,000.00 50,000.00 24,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,801.20 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 10 6 1 o 1 o o 2 o o o o 8 2 o o o o 3 o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 19 14 4 50 24 59,991 0.00 0.00 26,916.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 000.00 000.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 895.37 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43 I '<tI 00 I COUNT OF CDBG ACTIVITIES WITH DISBURSEMENTS BY ACTIVITY GROUP & MATRIX CODE UNDERWAY ACTIVITIES COMPLETED ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR TOTAL COUNT $ DISBURSED COUNT $ DISBURSED COUNT $ DISBURSED IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 2 PLANNING/ADMINISTRATIVE HOME Adm/Planning Costs of HOME CHDO Operating Costs Planning (20) General Program Administration Indirect Costs (21B) Public Information (21C) Fair Housing Activities - subject to 20% Admin cap (21D) Submissions or Applications for Federal Programs (21E) HOME Rental Subsidy Payments - subject to 5% cap (21F) HOME Security Deposits - subject to 5% cap (21G) HOME Admin/Planning Costs of PJ - subject to 5% cap (21H HOME CHDO Operating Expenses subject to 5% cap (21I) 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o o 165 443.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 443.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 o o o 2 o o o o o o o o 165 0.00 0.00 0.00 165,443.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 443.00 I tn 00 I PJ not 21A -not part part of of 5% 5% Adm cap Admin cap 19A) 19B) 165 PUBLIC SERVICES (continued) Homeownership Assistance Rental Housing Subsidies Security Deposits (05T) Homebuyer Counseling (05U 15 o o o o 94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 16 o o o o 116,501. 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 o o o o 116,595 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37 Not Direct (05R HOME TBRA (05S) UNDERWAY ACTIVITIES COUNT $ DISBURSED COMPLETED ACTIVITIES COUNT DISBURSED $ PROGRAM COUNT YEAR TOTAL $ DISBURSED COUNT OF CDBG ACTIVITIES WITH DISBURSEMENTS BY ACTIVITY GROUP IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA & MATRIX CODE DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 3 I \0 00 I TOTALS 19 14 769 17 24 935,955.B7 43 950,725.04 Unprogrammed Funds HOPWA (31) HOPWA Grantee HOPWA Grantee HOPWA HOPWA Project Project Activity (31A) Administration (31B) Activity (31C) Administration Sponsor Sponsor 31D o OTHER Interim Assistance (06) Urban Renewal Completion (07) Privately Owned Utilities (11) CDBG Non-Profit Organization Capacity Building (19C) CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher Education (19D Planned Repayment of Section lOB Loan Principal (19F) Unplanned Repayment of Section lOB Loan Principal (19G State CDBG Technical Assistance to Grantees 19H) 22 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o PROGRAM COUNT o o o o o o o o o o o o o o YEAR TOTAL $ DISBURSED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNDERWAY ACTIVITIES COUNT $ DISBURSED COMPLETED ACTIVITIES COUNT $ DISBURSED COUNT OF CDBG ACTIVITIES IDIS C04PR23 WITH DISBURSEMENTS BY ACTIVITY GROUP & U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA MATRIX CODE DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 4 IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA CDBG SUM OF ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS FROM THE C04MA04 SCREEN BY ACTIVITY GROUP AND ACCOMPLISHMENT TYPE UNDERWAY COMPLETED TOTAL ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACQUISITION/PROPERTY-RELATED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Rehab: PUbliCly/Privately Owned C/I (14E) Businesses 0 8 8 HOUSING Direct Homeownership Assistance (13) Households 0 2 2 Rehab: Single-Unit Residential (14A) Housing Units 0 68 6B PUBLIC FACILITIES/IMPROVEMENTS Public Facilities and Improvements - General (03) Public Facilities 0 1 1 Parks and Recreational Facilities (03F) Public Facilities 0 1 1 CATEGORY TOTALS .- .----- ------ Public Facilities 0 2 2 PUBLIC SERVICES Operating Costs of Homeless/AIDS Patients Programs 03T Persons 0 16 16 Public Services - General (05) Persons 0 3,123 3,123 Senior Services (05A) Persons 0 516 516 Battered and Abused Spouses 05G Persons 0 15 15 Child Care Services (05L Persons 0 286 2B6 Health Services (05M Persons 0 424 424 CATEGORY TOTALS - ----- ----- Persons 0 4,380 4,3BO PLANNING/ADMINISTRATIVE OTHER DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16: 42 5 I t-- 00 I IDIS C04PR23 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA CDBG SUM OF ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS FROM THE C04MA04 SCREEN BY ACTIVITY GROUP AND ACCOMPLISHMENT TYPE UNDERWAY COMPLETED TOTAL ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TOTAL OF ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS FROM THE C04MA04 SCREEN Persons 0 4,380 4,380 Households 0 2 2 Housing Units 0 68 6B Public Facilities 0 2 2 Feet/Public Utilities 0 0 0 Organizations 0 0 0 Businesses 0 8 8 Jobs 0 0 0 Loans 0 0 0 DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 6 I 00 00 I AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL TOTAL WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN ISLANDER & WHITE AM 4 2,740 310 392 14 228 17 lO 20 1 654 386 2 1,825 6 o 1 43 16 o 4 o 453 348 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN ASIAN AMERICAN Totlt #Hispanic Tot# ************************************************************ Households Not Specified #Hispanic Tot# #Hispanic I 0\ 00 I ************************************************************ NON-HOUSING Persons WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: TOTAL o WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN AM o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 74 45 6 11 o 2 o 1 o o 9 17 9 1 o o o o o o o 7 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Tot# #Hispanic Tot# ************************************************************** Households Not Specified #Hispanic Tot# #Hispanic ************************************************************** HOUSING Persons CDBG BENEFICIARIES BY IDIS c04PR23 RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME: PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 7 I o 0\ I WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE: NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN AM OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: TOTAL 2,740 310 392 14 228 17 10 20 1 654 4,386 1 2 825 6 o 1 43 16 o 4 o 453 34B 45 6 11 o 2 o 1 o o 9 74 9 1 o o o o o o o 7 17 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Tot# #Hispanic Tot# *************************************************************** Households Not specified #Hispanic Tot# #Hispanic *************************************************************** TOTAL Persons IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16: 42 8 IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 09-01-06 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TIME: 16:42 INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 9 PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA CDBG BENEFICIARIES BY INCOME CATEGORY EXTREMELY LOW LOW MOD TOTAL LOW-MOD NON LOW-MOD TOTAL BENEFICIARIES <=30% >30% and <=50% >50% and <=80% >BO% HOUSING - OWNER OCCUPIED Persons 0 0 0 0 0 0 Households 44 20 6 70 0 70 Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOUSING - RENTAL OCCUPIED Persons 0 0 0 0 0 0 Households 0 0 0 0 0 0 Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOUSING - TOTAL* Persons 0 0 0 0 0 0 Households 44 20 10 74 0 74 Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 NON-HOUSING Persons 2,998 949 377 4,324 62 4,3B6 Households 0 0 0 0 0 0 Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL Persons 2,998 949 377 4,324 62 4,386 Households 44 20 10 74 0 74 Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Note: If "HOUSING - TOTAL" does not equal the sum of "HOUSING - OWNER OCCUPIED" and "HOUSING - RENTAL OCCUPIED' it is due to the combination of data by income category captured with the old requirements and the new requirements I H 0'1 I o TOTAL TOTAL RENTALS TBRA FAMILIES FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS EXISTING HOMEOWNERS RENTALS AND TBRA HOMEBUYERS AND HOMEOWNERS 30% o o o o o o o 50% o o o o o o o 60% o o o o o o o BO% o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o TOTAL 0% - 80% o o o o REPORTED AS VACANT I N 0\ I ACTIVITY TYPE HOME UNIT COMPLETIONS BY PERCENT OF AREA MEDIAN 0% INCOME 31% 51% 61% TOTAL 0% - 60% TOTAL TOTAL RENTALS TBRA FAMILIES FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS EXISTING HOMEOWNERS RENTALS AND TBRA HOMEBUYERS AND HOMEOWNERS 0.00 AMOUNT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNITS COMPLETED o o o o o o o UNITS OCCUPIED o o o o o o o ACTIVITY TYPE DISBURSED HOME DISBURSEMENTS AND UNIT COMPLETIONS IDIS C04PR23 U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 10 WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE OTHER MULTI-RACIAL: AMERICAN TOTAL WHITE: & BLACK/AFRICAN ISLANDER & WHITE AM o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Totft o o o o o o o o o o o #Hispanic o o o o o o o o o o o Tot# o o o o o o o o o o o #Hispanic o o o o o o o o o o Tot# EXISTING HOMEOWNERS #Hispanic Tot# TOTAL, RENTALS AND TBRA #Hispanic TOTAL, HOMEBUYERS AND HOMEOWNERS TOTAL, RENTALS AND TBRA + TOTAL, HOMEBUYERS AND HOMEOWNERS I ("fl 0\ I TOTAL WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & WHITE ASIAN & WHITE: BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN & WHITE: AM.INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE & BLACK/AFRICAN OTHER MULTI-RACIAL AM o Tot# o o o o o o o o o o o ftHispanic o o o o o o o o o o o Tot# o o o o o o o o o o o #Hispanic o o o o o o o o o o o Totft o o o o o o o o o o o ftHispanic o o o o o o o o o o RENTALS TBRA FAMILIES FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS HOME UNIT COMPLETIONS BY rots C04PR23 RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM YEAR 2005 SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE TIME PAGE 09-01-06 16:42 11 1 'PIO' "'Pro~~qt;N;~i:J1;e: .. . 'Fijij(J ...... "E:~mmijt~m '.' '~'6ri:jmitted Dt~Vlii'(....rh"ll; bti:lwnJri .... '.' .' AvaJIable ..... .... . 2005-0001 CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL CDBG $4,000.00 $3,801.20 $3,801.20 $3,801.20 $0.00 2005-0002 CITY-SPONSORED CHILD CARE CDBG $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2005-0003 FRIENDS TO PARENTS CDBG $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2005-0004 SSFUSD CHILDREN'S CENTER CDBG $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 2005-0005 CITY SPONSORED ADULT DAY CARE CDBG $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $0.00 2005-0006 SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK CDBG $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2005-0007 OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM OF SAN MATEO COUN CDBG .$t 700.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $0.00 2005-0008 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES CENTER (NPNSC) CDBG $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $0.00 2005-0009 THE TOOTH MOBILE CDBG $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $0.00 2005-0010 PROJECT READ - WEST ORANGE LIBRARY CDBG $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 2005-0011 CORA (COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING RELATION: CDBG $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2005-0012 RAPE TRAUMA SERVICES CENTER CDBG $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2005-0013 ELLIPSE PENINSULA AIDS SERVICES CDBG $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2005-0014 PARCA SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM CDBG $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2005-0015 JOHN'S CLOSET CDBG $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 2005-0016 NORTH PENINSULA FAMILY ALTERNATIVES (NP CDBG $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 2005-0017 C.I.D. HOUSING ACCESS CDBG $17,051.00 $17,108.20 $17,108.20 $17,108.20 $0.00 2005-0018 REBUILDING TOGETHER PENINSULA CDBG $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $0.00 2005-0019 CITY-SPONSORED HOUSING REHABILITATION CDBG $310,802.00 $338,978.08 $338,978.08 $338,978.08 $0.00 2005-0020 CITY-SPONSORED COMMERCIAL REHABILlTATI( CDBG $175,000.00 $142,923.39 $142,923.39 $142,923.39 $0.00 2005-0021 CDBG PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CDBG $165,443.00 $165,443.00 $165,443.00 $165,443.00 $0.00 2005-0022 ADA MODIFICATIONS CDBG $50,000.00 $45,316.43 $45,316.43 $45,316.43 $0.00 2005-0023 PUBLIC FACILITY REHABILITATION CDBG $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $14,675.00 $14,675.00 $5,325.00 2004-0022 FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS ASSISTANCE CDBG $297,354.00 $201,185.57 $201,185.57 $101,185.57 $0.00 24 $1,160,850.00 $1,055,955.87 $1,050,630.87 $950,630.87 $5,325.00 of 1 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA.PR06.2005.09-13-06 I ~ 0\ I PR06 SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROJECTS FOR REPORT YEAR 2005 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DA TE:09-13-06 I~&} ~l~""~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #8 DATE: September 27, 2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY A USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS FOR A MOBILE COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) IMAGING UNIT WITH A NEW FIRE PROTECTION WALL AT THE REAR OF AN EXISTING KAISER MEDICAL CENTER Case No.: P06-0026 (UP06-0012 & DR06-0071) Address 1200 EI Camino Real Zone: Planned Commercial (P-C-L) SSFMC Chapters: 20.24 & 20.81 Owner & Applicant: Kaiser Permanente RECOMMENDATION That the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The project site is located at 1200 EI Camino Real. A residential neighborhood lies directly across EI Camino Real to the south and west, while commercial properties abut the site to the north and east. The Colma Creek Linear Park will be constructed along the creek. The proposed mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit would replace an existing mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unit that has been at the same location for many years (albeit without apparent benefit of City approval). The project sponsor believes that the proposed site location is optimal given considerations for staff and patient access, as well as power requirements. Other possible locations on-site are apparently not as convenient and would likely result in reducing open at-grade parking spaces. Due to fire protection requirements, the project will necessitate the construction of an 18 foot tall fire protection wall between the trailer and the Medical Center building. The project site's General Plan Land Use designation, Office, allows Medical Centers and ancillary facilities. The proposed mobile CT imaging unit is consistent with the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zone District, subject to a Use Permit approved by the South San Francisco Planning Commission (Section 20.24.030). Staff Report Subject: Kaiser Appeal P06-0026 Page 2 of 4 The SSFMC does not allow trailers for commercial uses except during construction or where it is made to appear as a permanent structure (SSFMC Section 20.24.070). The trailer and fire protection wall will be visible from the back of properties fronting on Mission Road and from the future Linear Park that will lie across the creek channel. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board reviewed the proposed project on April 3, 2006. The Board recommended that views of the trailer and the fire protection wall should be screened from the future Linear Park and properties fronting on Mission Road. The Board suggested that the applicant plant a 6 foot tall evergreen hedge along the perimeter property boundary fence to limit views of the CT trailer and fire wall. The applicant's revised plans include the Board's suggestion. PLANNING COMMISSION The proposed development, including the applicant's revised plans, were reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July 20, 2006. At the meeting the Commissioners repeatedly stated their support for the CT imaging facility, but expressed concerns regarding the use of a trailer and an 18 foot tall fire protection wall as permanent additions (as opposed to expanding the existing medical center), the design incompatibility with the Medical Center building and with the adverse views of the trailer and fire wall from users of the future Linear Park and neighboring properties. The Commissioners determined that the trailer itself and the lack of an internal access to the Medical Center were inappropriate and would be inconvenient, if not unsafe, for both patients and Kaiser Staff. The Commissioners similarly concluded that the fire protection wall was unsightly and that the hedge screen would have little to no screening value. The Commissioners observed that the SSFMC does not allow permanent trailers that are not sufficiently designed to complement the existing development, and that it does allow temporary trailers for the duration of a closely associated construction project (SSFMC Section 20.24.070). To underscore the point the Commissioners noted that they had no concern with Kaiser's temporary trailer housing an MRI unit, located in a portion of the parking area facing EI Camino Real structure, because it is temporary and will be removed at the completion of the renovation of the existing MRI facility within the Medical Center building. The Commissioners clearly understood and fully supported the need for the CT unit. Their focus was the quality of the design. The Commissioners reluctantly voted unanimously to deny the approval and at the same time encouraged the applicant to file a much better and more appropriate design that the Commission could approve. Findings of Denial were adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of August 3, 2006. Staff Report Subject: Kaiser Appeal P06-0026 Page 3 of 4 APPEAL The applicant filed an appeal on August 18, 2006. The appeal focuses on the need for the CT unit, but does not address any of the Planning Commission's design concerns. The applicant's letter contends that the Planning Commission did not understand the need for the project and made an error in arriving at their conclusion. The appeal letter contains several misrepresentations and errors as follows: 1. The adoption of the Findings of Denial occurred on August 3, 2006 and not July 6, 2006. 2. The Planning Commission understood the need for the project as evidenced in the applicant's letters of support addressed to the Commission, the Commission meeting minutes and the staff report (see the expanded discussion in the following section). 3. The Planning Commission did not err when it noted that parking spaces would be lost as the proposed CT trailer would occupy an area formerly devoted to truck parking. In response to questions and statements offered by both the Commissioners and the applicant's representatives, City Staff noted that several parking spaces have been temporarily "lost" on the El Camino Real parking area in association with the MR.I facility renovation - the temporary MR.I trailer occupies the parking spaces. 4. The current trailer at the back of the Medical Center (the project location) never had benefit of City approval (a Use Permit would have been required). 5. The Design Review Board did not approve the design as they are an advisory body and have no decision making authority and no expertise in or any authority to interpret the City's Zoning Regulations. The Board recommended that the Planning Commission consider the proposed design and suggestion of the addition of a hedge. As the minutes of the Planning Commission reflect, the need for the development was clearly understood and never in question; statements made by both the applicant's representatives and the Commissioners, reflected in the meeting minutes, underscore this point. The Commissioner's were simply concerned with the quality and appropriateness of the design. The applicant's representatives made it very clear at the meeting that they understood the Commissioner's concerns, but that this was a more "cost effective" design. Both the Commissioners and City Staff repeatedly expressed a desire and willingness to work with the applicant to develop a better design that the Commission could approve. The Planning Commissioners took great effort to express their concerns, so that there was no miscommunication or misunderstanding. The Commissioners were even open to the possibility of placing the trailer within a garage type enclosure that would blend with the Medical Center. The applicant's representative stated that while they had willingly added a hedge along the northerly property boundary, they were not going to make any other changes because it would exceed the project budget. Reluctantly, the Planning Commission denied the proposed project. The applicant's appeal letter, Planning Commission meeting minutes, Findings of Denial and the Staff Report are attached. Staff Report Subject: Kaiser Appeal P06-0026 Page 4 of 4 Should the City Council decide on a different course of action than that recommended by the Planning Commission, Draft Findings of Approval and Conditions of Approval are attached. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staffhas determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the provisions of Class 3, New Construction of Small Facilities, Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Because the project has been determined to be exempt, the Zoning Administrator is not required to taken action on an environmental document. CONCLUSION: The proposed trailer and fire protection wall are inconsistent with the City's Zoning Code Section 20.24.070, would result in the loss of parking, are inconsistent with the City's Design Guidelines and are incompatible with the design of the Medical Center and the future Linear Park. City Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal. BY:~ Assistant City Manager --. By: MD/SC ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Findings of Denial Optional Action Draft Findings of Approval Draft Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Staff Report of July 6, 2006 Staff Report of August 3,2006 Meeting Minutes of July 6, 2006 Meeting Minutes of August 3, 2006 Design Review Board Meeting Minutes of March 21,2006 Applicant's Narrative of August 1, 2006 Applicant's Appeal Letter of August 18, 2006 Photos Plans - fa FINDINGS OF DENIAL KAISER MEDICAL CENTER MOBILE CT IMAGING UNIT P06-0026 (As revised by City Staff on August 3rd , 2006) As required by the Use Permit Procedures (SSFMC Chapter 20.81), the following findings are be made in denial ofP06-0026 including UP06-0012 denying an application for a mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real, in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81, based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the planning Commission which include, but are not limited to: Plans prepared by Brewer Fraser Holland Lotito, Architects, dated February 24, 2006; Photos submitted by the applicant; Design Review Board meeting dated April 3, 2006; Design Review Board minutes dated April 3, 2006; Planning Commission staffreport dated July 6,2006; and the Planning Commission meetings of July 6 and August 3,2006: 1. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center will detrimental to the surrounding properties or improvements in that the proposed structures installed at the rear of the building will be highly visible from adjacent properties. The facility and screening wall will be visible from the back of properties fronting on Mission Road and future South San Francisco Linear Park that will lie across the Colma Creek channel. Section 20.24.070 (c) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code generally prohibits the use of temporary trailers within the Planned Commercial Use District. Although the applicant has proposed the mobile CT imaging unit be painted to match the body of the abutting Medical Center, with a hedge to visually screen views from nearby properties, the Planning Commission finds that the trailer is incongruous with the surrounding properties, would not be adequately screened from views of neighboring properties, and would be more appropriately accommodated by a permanent expansion of the existing abutting hospital facility. 2. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center is inconsistent with the South San Francisco General Plan. Implementing policy 3.4-1-13 of the Planning Sub-Areas element provides that in cooperation with Kaiser Hospital, the City shall undertake a program to alleviate the on- street parking shortage. During the public hearing on this matter, the applicant indicated that the placement of the mobile imaging unit would result in a net loss of parking spaces. 3. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center does not comply with all applicable development standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and all other titles of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. Section 20.24.070 generally limits the placement of temporary trailer structures as ancillary structures permitted only as construction office trailers subj ect to building division approvaL The grant of a Use Permit for a Mobile Imaging Unit would be inconsistent with this general prohibition, as the structure would not be integrated into the adjacent building and made to appear as a permanent structure. " * * OPTIONAL ACTION FINDINGS OF APPROVAL KAISER :MEDICAL CENTER MOBILE CT IMAGING UNIT P06-0026 (As recommended by City Staff on September 27, 2006) As required by the Use Permit Procedures (SSFMC Chapter 20.81), the following findings can be made in support ofP06-0026 including UP06-0012 allowing a mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real, in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81, based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the planning Commission which include, but are not limited to: Plans prepared by Brewer Fraser Holland Lotito, Architects, dated February 24,2006; Photos submitted by the applicant; Design Review Board meeting dated April 3, 2006; Design Review Board minutes dated April 3, 2006; Planning Commission staffreport dated July 6, 2006; Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2006; City Council Staff Report of September 27,2006; and City Council meeting of September 27,2006: 1. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center will not be adverse to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; nor detrimental to the surrounding properties or improvements in that the proposed structures will be installed at the rear of the building away from EI Camino Real where they will be less visible, the mobile CT imaging unit replaces an existing similar facility at the same site location, both new structures will be painted to match the body of the abutting Medical Center, and a hedge is required to visually screen views from nearby properties. 2. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center is consistent with the South San Francisco General Plan in that an imaging facility is considered ancillary to hospitals which are allowed uses at the subject site. 3. The mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center complies with all applicable development standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and all other titles of the South San Francisco Municipal Code in that the wall is required to provide a high level of fire protection for the Medical Center and the facility requires a Use Permit approved by the South San Francisco Planning Commission. * * * PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL KAISER MEDICAL CENTER MOBILE CT IMAGING UNIT P06-0026 (As recommended by City Staffon September 27,2006) A. PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The applicant shall comply with the City's Standard Conditions and with all the requirements of all affected City Divisions and Departments as contained in the attached conditions of approval. 2. The construction drawings shall substantially comply with the plans approved by the Planning Commission, prepared by Brewer Fraser Holland Lotito, Architects, dated February 24,2006, as amended by the conditions of approval. 3. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the final construction plans shall be include that the mobile CT imaging unit and the 18 foot tall fire protection shall be finished to match the building exterior, and that a continuous skirt be installed around the base of the mobile CT imaging unit finished to match the mobile unit. The design and finishes shall be subject to the review and approval by the City's Chief Planner. 4. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the construction plans shall include a landscape plan providing for a 6 foot tall evergreen hedge along the fence perimeter opposite the mobile CT imaging unit and portion of the adjacent Medical Center building and an automatic irrigation plan. The plans shall be subject to the review and approval by the City's Chief Planner. (planning Contact: Steve Carlson, Senior Planner, (650) 877-8535) B. BUILDING DIVISION 1. Provide identification of all exit doors and exit paths passing by the new unit. 2. Description of the new 4 hour wall construction. 3. Additional comments at plan review. (Building Contact: Jim Kirkman: Building Official, (650) 829-6670) C. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Municipal Code Compliance The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.48 of the Municipal Code, "Minimum Building Security Standards" Ordinance revised May 1995. The Police Department reserves the right to make additional security and safety Proposed Conditions of Approval P06-0026 Page 2 of 2 conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed/revised building plans. 2. Miscellaneous Security Requirements This mobile trailer must be equipped with a centrally monitored audible alann system, and secured when not in operation. On-site security personnel will make frequent and routine checks to assure this mobile facility is secure. (police Department contact: Sergeant E. Alan Normandy (650) 877-8927) D. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION 1. Plans should indicate if the mobile unit is connected to the sanitary sewer system. Plans should indicate how waste will be dealt with. 2. Fire sprinkler system test/drainage valve should be plumbed into the sanitary sewer system or collected and disposed ofin sanitary sewer. (Water Quality Control: Cassie Prudhel, Water Quality Control Coordinator (650) 829-3840) Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: July 6, 2006 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with a fIre protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C-L) Zoning District. SSFMC Chapters: 20.24 and 20.81 Owner & Applicant: Kaiser Permanente Case No.: P06-0026 (up06-0012 & DR06-0071) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve a Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real, subject to making the required fmdings and adopting the recommended conditions of approval. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The project site is located at 1200 EI Camino Real. A residential neighborhood lies directly across EI Camino Real to the south and west, while commercial properties abut the site to the north and east. Future development of the vacant lands across the Colma Creek channel (formerly a golf driving range) is intended to be median density multi-family residential (Transit Village District). The proposed mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit would replace an existing mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unit that has been at the same location for many years. The project sponsor believes that the proposed site location is optimal given considerations for staff and patient access, and power requirements. Other possible locations on-site would not be as convenient and would likely result in reducing open at-grade parking spaces. Due to fire protection requirements, the project will necessitate the construction of an 18 foot tall fire protection wall between the mobile unit and the Medical Center building. The project site's General Plan Land Use designation, Office, allows Medical Centers and ancillary facilities. The proposed mobile CT imaging unit is consistent with the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zone District subject to a Use Permit approved by the South San Francisco Planning Commission (Section 20.24.030). The SSFMC does not allow trailers for commercial uses except during construction or where it is made to appear as a permanent structure (SSFMC Section 20.24.070). Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: Kaiser Mobile CT Imaging Unit July 6, 2006 Page 2 of 3 The facility and wall will be visible from the back of properties fronting on Mission Road and the future South San Francisco Linear Park that will lie across the creek channel. Visual effects can be reduced by requiring that the mobile unit and the wall be finished to match the exterior of the adjacent building and that a skirt around the base of the mobile unit be required so that it appears more as a building (see condition # 3). DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board reviewed this application on April 3, 2006. The Board recommended that views of the mobile unit should be screened from the future linear park and properties fronting on Mission Road. The Board suggested adding a condition of approval requiring the applicant to add a 6 foot tall evergreen hedge along the perimeter property boundary fence on the opposite side of the drive aisle from a point in alignment with the southerly corner of the Medical Center building to a point extending several feet beyond the northwesterly corner of the proposed mobile unit. The Board's comments have been added as a condition of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staffhas determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the provisions of Class 3, New Construction of Small Facilities, Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Because the project has been determined to be exempt, the Zoning Administrator is not required to taken action on an environmental document. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed development complies with the City of South San Francisco General Plan and the Zoning requirements and development standards. Conditions of approval are recommended to enhance the compatibility of the new mobile unit and the wall with the existing Medical Center and reduce views from nearby properties. Therefore, it is recommended that the planning Commission approve a Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real, subject to making the required findings and adopting the recommended conditions of approval. ~~ S~ve Carls , Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Findings of Approval Draft Conditions of Approval Design Review Board minutes - March 21, 2006 Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: Kaiser Mobile CT Imaging Unit July 6, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Applicant's Narrative Photos Plans --- Planning Commission Staff ReQort DATE: August 3, 2006 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Adoption of Findings of Denial for a Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C-L) Zoning District. .. SSFMC Chapters: 20.24 and 20.81 Owner & Applicant: Kaiser Permanente Case No.: P06-0026 (up06-0012 & DR06-0071) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Denial for a Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 EI Camino Real. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission conducted a hearing on July 6,2006. After careful consideration of the applicant's testimony and plans, the Commissioners determined that the proposed mobile unit and free standing fire wall were unattractive, inconsistent with the Medical Center design, inconsistent with the City's Design Guidelines, and detrimental to the surrounding area, and would result in a loss of the limited on-site parking. The Commissioners directed that City Staff prepare Findings of Denial and encouraged the applicant to resubmit a design that would be attractive, functional, and integrated with the Medical Center. The Findings of Denial and the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Denial of a Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile CT imaging unit with a fire protection wall at the rear of an existing Kaiser Medical Center, situated at 1200 El Camino Real. ~s~~ ATTACHMENTS: Draft Findings of Denial Planning Commission Minutes - July 6, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting of July 6, 2006 Motion Sim I Second Prouty to adopt Resolution 2656-2006 recommending that the City Council certify EIR05- 0003 and approve P05-0035: PUD05-0003, UP05-0010, TDMO-0003, SIGNS05-0044 & DR05-0020. The Commission also recommended that the Council include the following: · Further stealthing of loading dock area. · Skin and texture the palette enclosure walls. Inclusion of a pavement pattern to make the loading dock look more like a plaza. · Incorporate spandrel glazing along the fa<;:ade to pick up on detailing of surrounding office buildings to make it look like an office. · The parking garage should have a filter or screening to hide cars on the second floor from street view. Eliminate all outside storage of lumber and returned items. · Consider adding Palm trees. · Include larger (ex 48" box size) trees near the loading dock area. · Amend Condition A7 to address outside storage and vendor issues. · Keep the site clean of boxes and debris. Roll Call: Ayes: Commissioner Giusti, Commissioner Prouty, Commissioner Romero, Commissioner Sim, Vice Chairperson Honan and Chairperson Zemke None None Commissioner Teglia Noes: Abstain: Absent: Approved by majority roll call vote. 3. CT Mobile I Kaiser Facility Kaiser PermanentelOwner Kaiser PermanentelApplicant 1200 EI Camino Real P06-0026: UP06-0012 & DR06-0071 Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (a) imaging unit with a new fire protection wall at the rear of the Kaiser Medical Center situated at 1200 EI Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81. Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report. David Sheston gave a PowerPoint presentation. He noted that they have installed another mobile unit near the front of the hospital which will soon be receiving a final inspection. Commissioner Romero questioned what were the plans for the unimproved land between Colma Creek and Kaiser. Senior Planner Carlson noted that he does not know who owns the land and is not aware of any plans for that area. Commissioner Romero noted that this could possibly be used for additional parking. Commissioner Prouty noted that the plans lacked detail and asked for additional elevations. He questioned if there would be a covered walkway. Mr. Sheston noted that there will not be a covered walkway. Commissioner Romero and the project architect discussed who would be going to the MRI facility and how they would access it. Mr. Sheston explained that this is an in and out patient service with dressing rooms in the mobile unit and that there is an elevator lift that all the patients would be using. Commissioner Giusti questioned why the unit could not be incorporated within the hospital. Mr. Sheston noted that this is new teChnOlogy. He added that there is not enough space within the building to accommodate the number of patients who need to be served. S:\ML""i-ttes\FLIMlLlzed ML""i-ttes\O:r-06-06 RPC MLlM<tes.cloc Pl1ge -+ of 6 Planning Commission Meeting of July 6, 2006 Commissioner Prouty questioned if there would be power cables all over the area where the trailer would go. Mr. Sheston noted that there is an underground connection and the trailer will have a cord that connects to the hospital system. Commissioner Prouty reiterated his concern about the lack of information on the plans and was concerned about voting on a project with so little detail. Commissioner Romero asked who approved the previous trailer. Senior Planner Carlson noted that it was installed without benefit of City approval. Vice Chairperson Honan noted that the solid wall will be subject to graffiti. Senior Planner Carlson noted that Kaiser has onsite security. Mr. Sheston noted that the trailer would be located on a 24 hour access road. He noted that there are currently no issues with graffiti at the nearby parking structure. Commissioner Romero noted that there has been a "temporary" trailer unit for 10 years at the site and questioned how long the new one is expected to be at this location. Ronaldo Beltran, Kaiser Permanente, noted that the trailer is for renovation of the a-Scanner within the building. He pointed out that there is a need for a new scanner. Commissioner Romero asked if this unit would eventually be moved anywhere else. Mr. Beltran noted that this unit will not be moved unless it malfunctions. Commissioner Romero noted this is going to be a permanent structure and suggested adding onto the building to serve the needs of the hospital. Mr. Beltran noted that their inclination toward a mobile a-unit is because it is reliable and cost effective. Commissioner Romero pointed out that the public using the future linear park will be looking at the back of the building and this trailer. Commissioner Sim questioned if Kaiser has a master plan projecting future growth. Mr. Beltran noted that there is a 10, 15 and 20 year plan for the Kaiser facility. He noted that this is the only change to the radiology department he foresees in the next 10 years. Commissioner Prouty also felt that this could be incorporated within the hospital and felt uneasy with the proposal. Mr. Sheston noted that the a-unit within the building will be upgraded but this cannot occur until a replacement unit is onsite. Vice Chairperson Honan asked if the trailer would be removed once the upgrades were done. Mr. Beltran noted that they will have three a-units on site and will leave this one onsite. Vice Chairperson Honan was concerned with allowing a major hospital in the City to have a trailer onsite. Commissioner Romero questioned why the hospital cannot have the mobile unit be temporary until the remodel is upgraded. He was concerned with granting a Use Permit taking into consideration that the first mobile unit was installed without the benefit of City approval. Mr. Beltran noted that the overall plan is that there needs to be 3 a-units in the hospital. Commissioner Romero questioned how many parking spaces are going to be lost due to the trailers being onsite. Mr. Sheston noted that they lost some parallel parking spaces but have reconfigured the area to gain back some parking spaces. Vice Chairperson Honan noted that if the trailer were to be temporary she would not have any issue, but being that it will be a permanent structure she could not support approval of it. Motion Honan I Second Prouty continue the item to allow staff to draft Findings of Denial for Planning Commission adoption. Approved by unanimous voice vote. ADMINISTRAnvE BUSINESS None ITEMS FROM STAFF None ITEMS FROM COMMISSION Commissioner Prouty asked staff for an update on the activity at the Bell Market site. Senior Planner Carlson noted that an Asian market is planned for the site and that they are relocating their entryway to the northeast S:\MLv..L.(tes\f'LV\.&Ilizecl M'v\'L.(tes\OrOG-OG R.1>C MLv\'L.(tes.cloc 1>&10' 5 of G o~'tt\ SAN p. L..~" ~:~A. ~~.-fPi'~~~ .~ o ..,~ .=-"- - -- ..... ::.. ,-- - ..Ill......, ~ f-< I CIJ ...... l j .__..---: n o '. ..~~.,~. """'''"' 0 ~-,~: ~ C~llFOR~"\~ MINUTES August 3, 2006 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENT: TAPE 1 7:30 D.m. Commissioner Giusti, Commissioner Prouty, Commissioner Romero, Commissioner Sim, Commissioner Teglia, Vice Chairperson Honan and Chairperson Zemke ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Planning Division: Susy Kalkin, Acting Chief Planner Steve Carlson, Senior Planner Bertha Aguilar, Admin. Asst. II Brian Crossman, Assistant City Attorney Ray Razavi, City Engineer Sergeant Alan Normandy, Planning Liaison Bryan Niswonger, Assistant Fire Marshall City Attorney: Engineering Division: Police Department: Fire Prevention. CHAIR COMMENTS AGENDA REVIEW None No Changes ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None CONSENT CALENDAR None 1. Approval of regular meeting minutes of July 6, 2006. 2. CT Mobile I Kaiser Facility Kaiser Permanente/Owner Kaiser PermanentelAppllcant 1200 EI Camino Real P06-0026: UP06-0012 & DR06-0071 (Continued from July 6, 2006) Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (a) imaging unit with a new fire protection wall at the rear of the Kaiser Medical Center situated at 1200 EI Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81. Items 1 and 2 pulled. 1 Approval of regular meeting minutes of July 6, 2006 - Commissioner Prouty clarified that he wanted to see 48 inc trees installed in the development near the loading dock and noted that the minutes can be approved with this change. Motion Prouty I Second Giusti to approve the minutes with corrections. Approved by majority voice vote with Commissioner Teglia abstaining. 2 CT Mobile I Kaiser Facility Kaiser PermanentelOwner Planning Commission Meeting of August 3, 2006 Kaiser Permanente/Applicant 1200 EI Camino Real P06~0026: UP06~0012 & DR06~0071 (Continued from July 6, 2006) Use Permit and Design Review allowing a mobile computerized tomography (a) imaging unit with a new fire protection wall at the rear of the Kaiser Medical Center situated at 1200 EI Camino Real in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24 and 20.81. Chairperson Zemke questioned if Kaiser will return with a new proposal. Senior Planner Carlson stated that he spoke to the Kaiser representative and noted that he did not allude to resubmitting their application. Motion Prouty I Second Honan to approve Findings of Denial for P06-0026: UP06-0012 & DR06-0071. Approved by majority voice vote with Commissioner Teglia abstaining. PUBUC HEARING 3. Malcolm Building Malcolm Properties/Owner The Hagman Group/Applicant 200 Oyster Point Blvd P06-0033: TDM06-0002, V AR06~0002, UP06-0011 & DR06-0032 Planned Unit Development allowing parking spaces and a trash enclosure in a portion of the minimum required 15 foot deep rear setback. Use Permit & Design Review allowing a 56,300 square foot 4-story office and building generating in excess of 100 average daily vehicle trips, open at-grade & garage parking for a minimum of 158 vehicles & landscaping at 200 Oyster Point Blvd in the Planned Commercial (P-C-L) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24, 20.81 & 20.85 Variance to reduce parking to a rate of 2.83 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area instead of the minimum required rate of 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.82 Transportation Demand Management Plan to reduce traffic impacts and allow a reduction in the minimum required parking in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.120 Public Hearing opened. Senior Planner Carlson gave a PowerPoint presentation. Dennis Meitinger, Hagman Group Architects gave a presentation on the project'"s site conditions and the highly articulated architecture. Public Hearing closed. Commissioner Teglia noted that the office buildings in the area are maxed with parking and pointed out that this is why there are TOM Plans being adopted. He questioned why a variance was being applied for. Senior Planner Carlson noted that a variance would be granted in association with the TDM to reduce the parking requirements. Commissioner Teglia noted that ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ITEMS FROM STAFF None ITEMS FROM COMMISSION None S:\MLv\'uteS\Ol?-0:3-0G RPC.l:toc p~ge::<of :3 DRB Agenda March 21, 2006 Page 4 of9 9. OWNER APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT NU1'vffiER PROJECT NAME ESTIMATED TIME Kaiser Permanente Kaiser Permanente 1200 El Camino Real P06-0026 & UP06-0012 CT Mobile! Kaiser Facility (Case Planner: Steve Carlson) DESCRIPTION Use Permit to allow a mobile imaging unit with a new fIre protection wall to be installed in the parking lot of the Kaiser Medical Center in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24, 20.81 The Board had the following comments: 1. Add a 6' tall evergreen hedge along the fence to the comer of the building. 10. OWNER APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT NU1'vffiER PROJECT NAME California Water Service Co. Cingular Wireless 480 Grandview Dr P06-0020, UPM06-0002 & DR06-0028 Cingular Wireless Use Permit (Case Planner: Steve Carlson) DESCRIPTION Use Permit Modification and Design Review allowing a wireless communication facility consisting of six (6) fence mounted antennas and an underground vault for equipment cabinets, situated at 488 Grandview Drive in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.81,20.85 & 20.105. The Board approved the application as submitted. 11. OWNER APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT NU1'vffiER PROJECT NAME Steven P. Silvestri AKC Services, Inc 555 El Camino Real P05-0172 & Signs05-0059 Type C Sign - Dollar Tree (Case Planner: Steve Carlson) DESCRIPTION Type "C" Sign Permit to install signs in excess of 100 sf of new signage situated at 555 El Camino Real in the Retail Commercial (C-l) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.22, 20.85 & 20.86. The Board had the following comments: 1. Use a maximum 6-inch wide raceway. 2. Consider replacement of planting "T-3" Toyon with a tree species, recommend Arbutus Marina. 3. Consider replacement of Azalea Formosa with a hardier plant. 4. Consider planting street trees along El Camino Real, recommend Purple Leaf Plum DINNER BREAK 6:20P.M. TIle Pennanente Medical Group, Inc. 1200 EL CAMINO REAL SOUm: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080-3299 (650) 742-2000 ANTIOCH CAMPBELL DAVIS FAIRFIELD FREMONT FRESNO GILROY HAYWARD MARTINEZ MILPITAS MOUNTAIN VIEW NAPA NOVATO OAKLAND PARK SHADELANDS PETALU~1A PLEASANTON MICHELLE B. CAUGHEY, M.D. Physician .in .Chief TAMARA TREFZ Medical Group Administrator August 1, 2006 Judith M. Honan Vice Chair Planning Commissioner City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 RANCHO CORDOVA REDWOOD CITY RICHMOND ROSEVILLE SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SAN RAFAEL SANTA CLARA SANTA ROSA S. SACRAlIfENTO S. SAN FRANCISCO STOCI\."TON VACAVILLE VALLEJO WALNUT CREEK RECEIVED PLANNING DEPT. Dear Ms. Honan: We are writing to provide more detail regarding Kaiser Permanente's permit request presented at your July 6 meeting (P06-0026 CT MobilelKaiser Facility - Use Permit allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit), and to ask you to reconsider your recommendation. Our representatives entered the meeting on July 6 with the belief that the permit would likely be approved. We had worked closely with the Design Review board, made changes to our plans at their request and that body had recommended approval on March 21,2006. Therefore, our presentation at the July 6 meeting focused on the design features and the changes we had made as a result of DRB feedback, and did not include information about the clinical necessity to our medical center and our patients of having this pad. We believe there are certain compelling facts supporting our request which you should be aware of prior to making a [mal decision. They are: · Demand for scanning services has increased 15 percent per year for many years, and this trend is expected to continue. The upgraded pad is very much needed to provide additional MRI services to the medical center and to provide additional CT appointments as the need for them increases. We also plan to use it to provide PET scanner services to our cancer patients. · All of these services are essential to the provision of high quality medical care. They are considered standard medical care and our patients would be seriously disadvantaged if they are not available on-site. · This trailer pad will upgrade one that has been in use at this location for about 20 years. · There is no room within the hospital for these services. KP SSF is very constrained for space right now. We are striving to provide the best care in limited space. There will be no additional room until we are able to rebuild our hospital (to be complete as late as 2030 but we hope by 2019). ... ~"" KAISER PERMANENTE~ 0890<.1 (REV. 11-00) Judith M. Honan August 1, 2006 Page 2 · Upon the Design Review Board's recommendation, we plan to install a six-foot tall evergreen hedge along the perimeter property boundary. We support the development of the Linear Park and understand the City's desire to conceal the trailer from view. Kaiser Permanente's goal is to continue to provide the best technology available to its 103,968 South San Francisco members, many of whom are City employees. Our organization has served South San Francisco since 1946 and we are committed to serving the people of this city for years to come. We sincerely hope you will reconsider your recommendation to deny ofJuly 6. We would be glad to answer in person or by phone any questions that you may have regarding this request. Sincerely, ~!fZf-- Michelle Caughey, MD Physician-in-Chief Phone: 650-742-2549 Linda Jensen Sr. Vice President and Area Manager Phone: 650-299-3122 MC-806/tb CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Plannmg Division 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080* (650) 877-8535 CLERK RUGi3~B5 Pt~ 2:33 APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Applicants who wish to file an appeal of a decision of the Chief Planner or the Planning CoID.J.Irission, )f a Design Review decision, shall submit the following (a letter or additional sheets may also be submitted): 2 What is the basis of your appeal? Include facts to support your appeal.and all pertinent information. ?\eCt$.e.. \~/0 lev -th ~. U #1kc--heJ tJ.fpl1t'._rjun!-! ;q.ller of a-preCt ( Il nJ 6UDDorh ()~ dC>G-()/h'-'.0-fav-f10/l, j ! 3 If you are the original applicant, submit thirty-five (35) reduced copies (8 1/2" x 11 ") of all exhibits (maps, plans, elevations, etc) which were submitted with the original application. 4 Filing fee - See Fee Schedule Name: f}1J1 - Fl.... ;J '-L/ . /-1'" V t2.. I c... J=: /r I i./ a rrlJ=::. / .' .' J17 --:; 01-ZAA ~rO . Signatu 9,/; BlOb Mailing Address: 1200 ~L t-{t,M}vV() KtilL- S:OI/Il-/ ~41'J Fri:.f'JJjC/~c..o. C,A C.)2/0YO , Date PhoneNo.lvsD 7';1--2103 *Mailing Address: P.O. Box 711, South San Francisco, CA 94083 1b.e Pennanente Medical Group, Inc. 1200 EL CAMINO REAL SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080-3299 (650) 742-2000 ANTIOCH CA.MPBELL DA. VIS FAIRFIELD FREMONT FRESNO GILROY HAYWARD MARTINEZ MILPITAS MOUNTAIN VIEW NAPA NOVATO OAKLAND PARK SHADELANDS PETALU1>1A PLEASANTON MICHELLE B. CAUGHEY, M.D. Physician.in-Chief TAMARA TREFZ Medical Group Administrator August 18, 2006 City of South San Francisco Planning Division PO Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 To Whom It May Concern: RANCHO CORDOVA REDWOOD CITY RICHMOND ROSEVILLE SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SAN RAFAEL SANTA CLARA SANTA ROSA S. SACRAMENTO S. SAN FRANCISCO STOCIITON VACAVILLE VALLEJO WALNUT CREEK This application for appeal is in regards to the decision made by the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission on August 3, 2006, to deny a use permit request (p06- 0026 CT MobilelKaiser Facility) allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with fIre protection to exist behind the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center at 1200 EI Camino Real. At this time, space for additional CT imaging units or other scanning units is not available in the facility. The demand for these services is increasing at a faster pace than we are able to build additional space. These services are essential to our members.and patients, and it is imperative that we are able to meet growing demand and provide safe patient care to our patients. BACKGROUND For many years, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center has housed a mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unit behind the Medical Center, allowing patients to receive on-site imaging services. To meet demand for these services, Kaiser Permanente has recently added a state-of-the-art MRI suite, currently housed within the Radiology Department on the fIrst floor of the Medical Center. In the meantime, demand for scanning services throughout the nation has increased 15 percent per year for many years, and this trend is expected to continue. In order to meet demand, Kaiser Permanente must continue to provide additional imaging services to the Medical Center. These services are essential to the provision of high quality medical care. We believe there are compelling facts supporting our request which you should consider when reviewing this appeal. ... ~"'~ t1 ~ KAISER PERMANENTE ilD 08904-' (REV. 11-00) 1 Design Review Board Recommendation - Hedge Upon review of the permit request (p06-0026 CT MobilelKaiser Facility - Use Permit allowing a mobile computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit), the Design Review Board approved the request with one change: adding a "six-foot tall evergreen hedge along the fence to the corner of the building." The purpose of the evergreen hedge is to conceal the pad from adjacent properties year- round, and Kaiser Permanente will fulfill this recommendation upon approval of the permit request. We understand the City's concern of an "unattractive" structure being visible, but we believe that an evergreen hedge would significantly conceal the pad, as can be seen in the photographs included with this application. Correction: Parking Spaces In the Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 3, 2006, the Background! Discussion stated "that the proposed mobile unit and free standing fire wall ... would result in a loss of the limited on-site parking." This is an error made by the Planning Commission. Parking has never been allowed in the location of the current pad, and if the space were clear, parking would still not be allowed as it might interfere with ambulance traffic. Space Constraints The mobile CT imaging unit offers the flexibility of providing continuously changing modalities required for different procedures as well as keeping up with changes in technology, occuning more frequently. This flexibility is not as readily possible or cost effective when compared to changing out built-in modalities. Currently, there is not sufficient amount of space within the Medical Center to add these units. Although we agree that placing the CT imaging unit within the Medical Center would be ideal, it is not realistic at this time. The facility is constrained for space and we strive to provide the best care to our members and patients in limited space. There will not be additional room until we are able to rebuild our Medical Center (as late as 2030 or as early as 2019). In the meantime, this is the best solution to meet demands and patients' needs, especially those in the Emergency Department. Changing Technology - Changing Needs As mentioned earlier, the demand for scanning services has increased at all medical centers. Even more so, changing technology can be challenging for any medical center when demand for these services increase. In order to provide patients with the best medical care, it is essential that the services be available on-site. When the services are constantly evolving, the challenge is to efficiently provide state-of-the-art technology to our members within limited space. If the services are not available on-site, patients will be required to receive services elsewhere. 2 SUM:MA.RY On Tuesday, March 21,2006, the City of South San Francisco Design Review Board reviewed Kaiser Permanente' s request to replace a mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unit currently behind the Medical Center with a computerized tomography (CT) imaging unit with a new fire protection wall to be placed behind the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24,20.81. Kaiser Permanente worked closely with the Design Review Board to make changes to the plans to meet the request that the design be attractive, functional and integrated with the Medical Center at this time. Upon review, the Board had determined that the application will comply with the Zoning Ordinance and Design Guidelines after the addition of a "six-foot tall evergreen hedge along the fence to the corner of the building" behind the Medical Center. Kaiser Permanente agreed to make this change. Kaiser Permanente's presentation on July 6, 2006, to the Planning Commission focused on the design features and the changes we had made as a result of the Design Review Board feedback, and did not include information about the clinical necessity of the pad to the Medical Center and our patients. On Thursday, July 6, 2006, the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission voted (6-0-1) to adopt Findings of Denial to allow a CT imaging unit to replace the existing MRI unit behind the Medical Center. Our organization has served South San Francisco since 1946. Kaiser Permanente South San Francisco serves 103,968 area residents, many of them City of South San Francisco employees. In addition to serving our subscribers and members, Kaiser Permanente serves the South San Francisco population through its Emergency Department, a commitment that we take very seriously as a community hospital. Our commitment to serving the community and the South San Francisco population is why our appeal should be seriously considered. Providing these services and having the equipment on-site is important for patients seeking health care services. Sincerely, /@{t~, jtWD / Michelle Ca4he{yn Physician in Chief ~?f.-Zf~ Linda Jensen Senior Vice President and Area Manager 3 ViEW 2 August 18, 2006 Steve Carlson Senior Planner Department of Economic and Community Development 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Appeal for planning case #P06-0026, Application to Locate a Mobile CT Unit Project: Kaiser Permanente Application to Locate a Mobile CT Unit Dear Mr. Carlson, Kaiser Permanente and BFHL Architects are submitting this package for review by the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission. Please find enclosed 35 copies, with the following exhibits for the appeal process: Cover letter (submitted with original application) Sheets 1-6: Site photos (submitted with original application) Hospital site plan (submitted with original application) Sheet A2.0: Enlarged plan of project area (submitted with original application) Sheet A2.1: Revised plan of project area (new) Sheets A3.0, A3.1, A3.2, A3.3: Photos of before and after conditions (new) Sheet A5.1: Mobile CT Elevation (submitted with original application) Sincerely, Benito Olguin cc: Renato Beltran Carolyn Van Niel Ralph Lotito Andy Crocker Brewer Fraser Holland Lotito, Architects 11~ SansomeStreel, S"ite 130U, San Frandsco, CA 9410~ (~lj)981-2345 j(4Ij)981-23~3 IRANSMITIlA FOR APPEAL doc . February 23, 2006 Steve Carlson Senior Planner Department of Economic and Community Development 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Application to Locate a Mobile CT Unit Project: Kaiser Pennanente P AF 135-639, KPSSF07 Dear Mr. Steve Carlson, Kaiser Pennanente and BFHL Architects are submitting this package for review by the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission. The project is to locate a Mobile CT Imaging Unit at the current location of a Mobile:MRI Imaging Unit. The current unit is connected to the Hospital "I" occupancy building. A new connection has been installed to provide power from the Medical Office Building, a "B" occupancy building. This requires a separation of "occupancies". Through code research and consultation with the hospital staff including, Inspector of Record (lOR), state OSHPD Area Compliance Officer (ACO), state Fire Marshall Representative, and City of South San Francisco Fire Marshall a 4 hour separation wall could be built to meet the separation requirements. The wall will need to be 36'-0" long 18'-0" tall located 4'-0" from the Hospital. The approach is to make the wall as minimally invasive to the site as possible yet meeting all the structural requirements to construct the wall. We are providing a Hospital site plan, enlarged area of Mobile unit location, elevations, existing photos of the site, and photo rendered drawings approximating the appearance of the wall. Sincerely, ~~~~ David A. Sheston cc: Renato Beltran Carolyn Van Niel Ralph Lotito Andy Crocker Brewer FIaser Holland Lotito, Architects 114 San.rome Street. Suite 1300, San Francisco. C494104 (415)981-2345 /(415)981-2343 Letter ,.' ; '" ~ -"-c-_ ------- ---- - -- --....- ~ ":~:'1~"i,~''*:~~:-"7"~1 .;:: .', :-: :....~ . .~ ..;:,:;~... '. :'~.',.YJ ~ .... ...:.,..:.::.::J ::...j .. '. ". . ~ . ',.:'0 :"-!~' ......~ :.. ~ ' ., . " ': ~ ~,~...._-_.......:.....:_,- .n_............... . .l~ . :~ i,: " .... .:' ~i;~~----__nuu----.h__.._--._.._.._u--...- - .j ~. ~. .....:/. .- - "f.l - ." .... J .- ~......~~.1!'.:~-:!~-.'!'o.~;lI ~ ~ --- t:X1S7lN -- . AMaUL.A~Ct: ------ .,;:. _. /FlRt:L. . ;:;:; _. ANt: --- --- --- --- -- '- J:i ~. 'a---- ~ii: I HO~PltA'L ;-':. REl.IOVED (n I AND (El CURSrENCE . . ~. . ME ...:.... '.' .,.: . D~CAL OFFICE" . .... U[LDI~.G . :1.1~~~ :~~jt~tJ~; ._n_..;........ s' ~. . " ., ,~ ~ ~. . '''~ ~ ........--.fr ~ . ~ ' ~: '. !l .~ ~ .:.' . ~ 'l J. ~ ~ . ~ . 't~ ~ a-" ~ .' ;.........__nn_ . .~ . '. . r. . : .' . .....:__n....../ :. . .... '. ..._-;......... ...............:, __..........:......:....:.:_:::i ," .. ." I ...,': CD ~9BIl-; c 1 8 = 1-0' T \)NI:;( PLAN III 24 X 36 ' ;tI p !ENTE 02/24/06 ILE CT I I UNIT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER,1200 EL CA~J1INO REAL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISION REVIEW MOB MAG NG ----1 i -+ j----------------------- , 0 r---l c-::J---------_ ! L.r--J c=J ----.-----_______~ I I , j ~,~' I' ':- -, i> , . , " I -, j " '- -, J ::- i :-' , ' j i I 'rl= 2) ) ~ EMERGE}; ~ .-v 'oJ: T , Pf..,F~Ki T i ~G ~ ~'i1 '~......~;},.~ v~;1 ~. ~......./..".;-< 6,~J./ Mt ~-~ =:!;.-1 ;;A~L... ~~f) !ZZZ/; ~./.' ~ ,,,::..:::,;'.:""'..70.- :~...:..;.~.~' ::~' ~.;;:.J:~:'''; ~::.::,:,,~ :.:~.:-: ~3tt;:.i [~~!it.~ ~~~~ ~"Jl-?f~~ H C ~~;."""""""''''': ~. -~. .,~ ~ . !'-oo'." .~ '----' _.' . . ~jk~i .:: -- ":.:.:. i~...,J~:."" '"). t~Y~1~~~~~~~:';;~H~O ::;..~;.: ;:~.:;-::;,~ :...~, <:.'.~' ~j II I ~ Ue=: ;...~A,.-: .---...":,.' ........ . -:;.~;~i:::. , .~......~~ ~IJii ~ f~~5:~ ES3 ,:":"i CREEK [l C!\M\NO R[!\l REA o PROJECT LOCATION - ~ : ~ PARKING STRUCTURE ~ ~ --------- ----------- ----------- -----------~ PROJECT LOCATION Fl<t6r lev.O Sectlon:- Pf.F1:. 135-eJe Permit or 0St-F0 No. "'Me A2.0 Of Slwet. ~..- ;;~. -:- ~ .. : ~~+z.~::~t;~ . ,,-. ... . ..... .:: .:~"'. ."":..._l i.~1~if~~'f ... -~:.::~.# :::: ~~~:~:; .~,':~.~ ~:~. :,.: ....;:.. ~~ '. ...: . .. '";:~. ~ ..:.....- ':-~ - .:. .~/ ,.;:: ~-~ -;. ~:-- ...: :::8~~m ',~ ......... ...\"'_..~:.-=<:",,",,'" ..,.. . .....:...-. .....:..~.~ ...:..-:-;~..: ' .,.....~....:...~. .. . ..... :. "::;.--~""z' .... -:...... . - .0' " '. .. o. .: 00 .0 0.0 -< .. ; .. . . :' .0 o. .... - .- .. .0. -~ .-1 '. . - .. .- ". oo~ 00 .. o. 00 o. . HOSPITAL 6_. - .-." .. .0 .0 '0 .. .. ,._-------:-:-.-..---.- . 0' 00 o .. .0 - . . ......- -.... . ~ 0 ~o 00.0: :: ['I'.: ........- ... ':,.. ..:-.... . -::. . .. ..- . . .. .... - - .... . .. ... ...... -. , .... -.. o 0 0 . 0 .... - . 1:0. .0.,0 .f ;"' o. .-: I . ' . . ... .- t~-.:..o. ';1~ .,,::: , o. .' . ,. - ,. , 00 . _..- .... .. .- "-...: ........ - ...-.... . .. . ...... -... . . ..- - -...--.. ...-':... .. o . 0 . "':-. ......:;-...- ..--= ...- ... ... ..- .. 00 , ..... - . . -. . o. .,..: ~ ,. .' . .--:-. . :-'- . .... . 0 ... .... 1. e;,. .... :.... ---------~-~------------ ~RTY UN( --..- ---..- - ---- ------------ ------------ - ---. ---- -------- --- -- 0---------- ----------- ""CE .. ..... 0.0 00. ..., :... :...... ...-..... :..........;.. : .. ....... .- ":.. ::.: ..:.-.: -.~~. ,. ... .-. .... .. . ......-.. .-.... .' ...... 00. 00 - ., -.. -.... ...... .. o. .o..~ .<:. 0../. ": o 0_ . .:,.. . :...: .. ::.... ... .. " . . .0 ::.... .:. ...: _.... t.:...:..... .-.. .. . .. ... .... ". ....... . . .- . .... ... ... ... - . :_ _"Z .. :'z :.:-: -...':. .. -: -:'" ~. .... .~ 1 E) \ ~ ~ II all Oro~ By. '*" Ch~ed 8y: OAS IS3lItI Dale: 02.2....015 pO(: No:0'435 8IGg.No:Q Sede: JS NOlED Project foclity: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CEN TER 1200 EL CAMINO REAL, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Ard"litect,lErHjineer Of Record: Thf. doa..-nerlt f; ~ property e! th!l Owner and II not to be U8ed without wrltt... pttm'lllslon. Projtct Ard11t.ct Approvol: KPFF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1160 BATTERY STREET, SUITE 300, SF, CA 94111 p.415.989.-1004 f.415.989.1552 Con....llonts/Controctor: BKF ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS 2737 N. MAIN STREET '200 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 p.925.940,2200 f.925.940.2299 Art:hlt.et: . --.....-- 1.1 ...~- ~.,~ SonPoo<o<:io<o,c.wo.n;", 'Hl04 p_4159112J.4S r....r. ...- 8. 8. 8. facilities Development Post Office BOil: 12916 Ookiand. C<llifomic:l 94604 ;ii KAISER PERMAN3\l'TE Kaiser Foundation HeQlth Pkln, Inc. MOBILE CT 1M AGING UNI T TItle: MOBILE CT UNITo SITE PLAN .. - ;,,>:-;,:~,,':,,:,x,.""~=:-"''''''~~:-''::::']' ...~ .' . .~ 1 < ~ < ..f .~ . .":' :~. .1 . ~ ,":', ~ ....l. .: ~ .~ '.' .~ .~ ~ " I ".~ ~ ...~ .~ . , ~~~-.:,.,~ . :~ ., .. . f , .::; '::; .t x , ~~.:.,..:..-.:..;..~-' ,~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ...} x .k ~f ~..~.;;;,..;.;...~..",",........~~.i -------- I I NeE I - ~~. ::: ~ ~ . """;,,,,,,,,<>>,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,J. .--..~ ',' ~ ~. .~ ~. '" ~ ~. ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~. ,~ ~ ~ '" .~ ~ ~ $:"- ~ HOSPITAL iiiiiiiIL.+ MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING !I ,---1 II ------- . NORTH ~roperty of the be used without . '~'""'-'- I I '''"'''''' "",'"'' .".."t.,. .1."-,,, "11111 ,,,,, ,;;;;,ili l\U Consultants/Con tro(:t Dr BKF EDGloEERS SUR'li. ,CJRS PLAooERS 2737 O. MAiO STREET #200 WALoUT CREEK. "c:~ 94597 p.925.940.220D f925.940.2299 KPFF STRUCTURAL f.C'~iD~ERS 1160 BATTERY S1ReET, SUITE 300, SF. c.~ 94111 p.415.989.-1004 1.415.989.1552 Revi o. f::.,. f::.,. f::.,. Architect/Engin eel ord - Facility. SOUTH SAG FRAOOSCO MEDiCAL CEDTER 1200 EL C..~MIDO REAL, SOUTH SALJ F;~,ADCISCO, CA 94030 Project ntle MOB'LE CT IMAGiOC !JDIT Sheet Title MOB!LE CT U~J!T- SITE PLAN REVISED Foe: 00: C035 Bldg 00: 01 Floor lev; 0 Section:- P^FR: 1J5~639 Scale: AS DOTED Permit or OSHPD Do Drown By. DH Sheet: Checked By: OAS A2.1 Issue D 02.24.05 Of S This document is !h Owner and is not to written permission. Project Architect Ap ions: --~----- l("""-sion: Facilities Post Olk.. Oakland, Co .-. fit KAISER PERMAl\lENT"E Kaiser FoundQlin" Inc. rbx larnia 94604 1 I _ iT' AWl": ~ Scola A$ HOlED I. 0._ B~ NIl Ch_ Bl' OAS I.... Oat.: 02.24.06 H..01 f14tr \.001:0 _- PN'f. t.13I _~"OSIf'IlHo. - A3.0 Of _ nu. MOBILE CT UNIT- SITE PHOTOS ... .-. - roell TIll. documlt\1 I. \Il. ptcpel1Y ., tho 0... oM I. nol 10 be uHd "'_1 ",Ill., ponnlAIon. Projool Arohl\tclt Approoal: ecn..IIa,I./ecnlf.CI.... ilKI' ENGINEERS SURVEYORS P~ANNERS 2737 N. MAIN STREET 1200 WALNUT CREEK, CJ>. 94597 p.925.940.2200 f.925.940.2299 KPFF StRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1160 SA TTERY STREET, SUITE :$(lei, SF. CA 94111 p"15.989.-1004 f.41!S.989.1552 CT IMAGING UNIT 11y. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER 1200 E:l CAMINO REAL. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94080 Prejlcl Archllacl/Envln'" Of R.....d: ~OBILE T1tto: Archlltcl: . ar-PlIIt:rlii>>clLalikl,,~ 114~1I~ J,.kc:JOO s.r.o~~"'1Ot p.415.911.DU UIS.~I.2KJ II --. ~ ",: ....... racnlll.' O.....lcpm.nl Poal OIftce e.. 12916 Oakland, Callfornl. 94604 "'1- - Inc. roo N..CN35 III ""'01 _ Lav.O _:- OW,. '3lI-Q1 - AS NOlED o'""~ or 06If'0 No. Oro.. Sy. NH _ _Sy. DAS A3.1 I..... Dat.: 02.24.011 Of 9000\8 Slloot 11110: MOBILE CT UNIT. SITE PHOTOS ~ MOBILE CT IMAGING UNIT ~acllt" SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER 1200 EL CAMINO REAL. SOUIli SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94080 ProjKt TIllo: 1111. documonl I. tho proporty Of tho Own.. ond ,. "ot to bo uoed wlthout wntll!' ",",,1011... OrojKt ~Itool Appro"': CorloUItonto/ConlroCtor. a~ ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS 2737 N' MAIN STREET 1200 WALNUT CREEK. CA 94597 p.925.94O.2200 f.925.940.2299 KPFF STRUClURAL ENGINEERS 1160 BATTERY STREET. SUITE 300. SF. CA 94111 p.415.989.-1004 f.415.989.1552 NeIlllocltEntl.'" Of Rocord: Arc:lllloct . 1Itmtr..,H.-.Idl..QlllQ,~ Ilf"_Sb--. ,,*1:500 ~~c.I'" PolI04 pA1~)S1~ MUJt1.:lJ.U r"""' .. - 8 ~ ..,- f"aelIlUOI O....opmllnt P081 Of"08 So. 12918 Ooldand. Collfornlo 941104 f)fij II'AISER PeRM Kola... Foundotlon Hoolth Pion, - Inc. 11ft IfAI5ER P&RM ~al.... Foundation H.a1th Plan. Inc. faclU!l.. O.VlIlapment Poet Offic. Ba. 12916 Oakland. Callfamla 94l1D4 R.. Iono: ... - .. .... - ~ Arcllltoct . --.--- lIU~_s.. WII1300 ka~Ctt~ ,..104 . p.41~II8I.1J41 U1S,9tl12)O CCNUlt""t,/Conlractor, BKF ENGINEERS SURVf;YORS PLANNERS 2,737 N. MAIN STREET #200 WALNUT CREEK. CA 94597 p.925.94O.2200 1.925.940.2299 KPFF $TRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1160 BA mRY STREET. SUITE 300. rto CA 94111 p.415.989.-1 4 1.415.969.1552 This _m..t I. tII. pr"",,">, 01 1111 OWoor ond '" not to b. "lid wlthQUI Wrillln ptfITllnlo\l. Projoal __ """royal, _I~ Of Record: Fa"nlty. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER 1200 EL CAMINO REAL. SOU"JH SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94080 ProJoel TItle: MOBILE CT IMAGING UNIT SIlo.t TItlo: MOBILE CT UNIT. SITE PHOTOS roc Mo:a.JS 11<<01 Flo<< IMO _:- _ AS NOltll ~N'. '.131 """'~ at 0Sf'\l No. ~.... 8)ll NH l5l>..b ~ By. gAS A3.2 ~!laW: 02.24.01 QI _to foe NOICM!5 -dO Motet "'ocr ~O $tc:t:IOl't- .U" ,_ Sedo: ~ NOTED P<<mn ot OSH'O No. Or_ B~ NH _ 01- B~ OAS A3.3 ..... 11<1,0: 02.24.08 or Sil..bI MOBILE CT UNIT. SITE PHOTOS s-t rocll,y: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER 1200 El CAMINO REAL. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ProjKt T1'~ o\fdlltto'/Ent""" Of 11\1. do"'mon, " \he ",q..rt~ 01 tn. 0.... and '" no, to b. uPel 1OI1h"" nr1\1e> ,.",,100100. Projll., "'dllIoC' Appro"'" I<fFF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 11,60 BATTERY STREET, SUITE 300, Sr, CA 94111 p.415.989.-1004 f.415.989.1552 e..,ouI,..,I,jtontra.lon B~ ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS ~737 N. MAIN STREET #200 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 p.925.940.2200 f.925.940.2299 Tltl<< 1ol0BIU: CT IMAGING UNIT - i ! , J l 1 I A,dllltot, . lI+~SIn(1 u.uoo _~~""O+ p.41'''1~ Utl.!I6l...DoU .....,.JIrutf&a.d~AI:hiIcd A. Ii;: ~ '" ....... .- 1ft KAISeR PERM 1<01_ Foundallon HoaIlh Plan. ..1.... F.oIl1'1.. Olvelopmtnt POIlI Offtce Box 12916 OakI<lnd, CalIfornia 94604 - Inc. MOBILE CT UNIT ELEVATION N.T.S. I I 10=.... 0 F'i Ib=! CCC :DC D C D C 10 C D I:=! '-- '-- ....... D ,-., ~ nnn IDC ::;::;;;;;: n J;;;;; n n n n bd n n ~!!::::!I~ bd ~ f==! I:=J I==! I:=J t:::::J - ~ ~ D F"'"l ~ CDC DD 0 C D C 0 D D '=! (E) ENCLOSED WAlJ<WAY = ~ l (E) MOB r (N) WOOtLE CT \.tilT I U (E) HOSPiTAl IIIIIIII1 IIIII\! I ill KAISER PERMAIIoEN'TE Kaiser Foundation Health Pion. Inc. facilities Development Post Office BOJl: 12916 Oddand. O:Jllfomta 94604 R....Ion.. .... ...... .J!; 0-. ~ 8 8 8 Ard1lt.ct . --.....-....... 1,.___ SuikUOIl SOOOP.....--,CditOaW. \IOltOol I I ",,~,~, "u,,,.. Conlultants/Con tractor: BKF ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS 2737 N. MAIN SlREEi *200 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 p.925.940.2200 1.925.940.2299 KPFF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1160 SA TTERY STREET, SUI1E 300, SF, CA 94111 p.415.969.-1004 1.415.969.1552 Thfi doo..,..,,;nt I; trn: property ef th~ OWner ond J. not to be U8ed without written permlllslon. ProJ-et Architect Approvot: An::f1itedjEnqinHf Of Record: FocRlly. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER 1200 EL CAMINO REAL, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94060 Project TItle: MOBILE CT 1M AGING UNI T Sheet Title: MOBILE CT UNIT- ELEVATION Foe: Ho:OU!5 914g No:01 Floor lev:O s.et;1on:- PAF~ 1~.]9 Sed.: ,6,S NOTED Permit Of OSHPO No. Drown By. NH Sh..t:: o."""e<l .. DAS A5. 0 Of s.-t. - ~'t\\. S:1N ti o n ;.... c;; ~ C"') '-' 0 0tlIFO-p..~""~ AGENDA ITEM #9 Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 27,2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager CHILD CARE FEE INCREASE- CONSIDERATION OF A FEE INCREASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 20.115.030 (F) RECOMMENDA TION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving an increase in the Child Care Facility Impact Fee. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In October 2001, the City Council adopted a child care facilities impact fee to address the child care needs of new businesses and residents. The nexus study on which the fee is based estimated that by 2020 there will be a demand for an additional 4, 784 child care spaces in the City, 2,352 of which will be attributable to new development. The City Council agreed to a goal of having new development fund the cost of providing 50% of these new slots, or 1,676 spaces, with the City providing for the other 50%. The child care facilities fee is assessed on all new development according to an adopted formula that shows a nexus between the amount of the fee and the cost of future child care facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The revenue generated by this fee is to be used by the City exclusively to construct new child care facilities or to provide funding for expanding existing child care facilities in the city. At present, the fund balance stands at $1,359,884.00. Based on our experience in building the Gateway Child Care Center, which cost approximately $3 million in 2002 and was built on donated land, it is estimated that a similar facility for 100 children would cost in the range of $4 - 5 million today. While the fee is not intended to only fund construction of new stand alone facilities, it is likely that one or more new facilities will be needed in the future. The implementing ordinance, South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.115, includes a provision to allow the City Council to consider annual increases in the fee by a percentage amount equivalent to the annual change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. The fee has not been increased since its inception in 2001, while the Construction Cost Index has increased Staff Report Subject: Child Care Fee Increase Page 2 14% over this period. To maintain an adequate funding source for the additional child care slots, equivalent to that initially approved by the City Council, staff is recommending a 14% increase in the child care facility impact fee. The change in the fee structure is shown below: Residential Uses - low density - medium density - high density - other residential $1736/unit $1979/unit $ 1630/unit $1858/unit $1621/unit $1851 unit $1.12/gsf $l.28/gsf CommerciallIndustrial - commercial/retail - hotel/visitor services - office/R&D - other non-residential $0.60/gsf $0. 68/gsf $0. 16/gsf $0.18/gsf $0.50/gsf $0.57/gsf $0.17/gsf $0.54/gsf CONCLUSION The City Council has established a target of having new development fund a portion of the cost to provide the new child care facilities that will be needed as a result of the increased demand generated by new development. In order to ensure that adequate funding is available to construct these facilities in the future it is critical to keep fees in line with the increased costs of construction. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a 14% increase in child care facility impact fees. B Marty Van Duy Assistant City M Approved: Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE CHILD CARE FACILITY IMPACT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNCIPAL CODE SECTION 20. 115.030(F) WHEREAS, in October, 2001, the City Council adopted a child care facilities impact fee to address the child care needs of new businesses and residents; and WHEREAS, the ordinance establishes a fee based on a prescribed formula establishing a nexus between the amount of the fee and the cost of future child care facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed; and WHEREAS, the enabling ordinance contains a provision that allows the City Council to consider annual increases in the fee by a percentage amount equivalent to the annual change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index; and WHEREAS, the fee has remained unchanged since its original adoption in 2001; and WHEREAS, to maintain adequate funding for anticipated child care facilities needs within the City, the Council wishes to increase the child care facility impact fee by 14%, the cooresponding increase in the Construction Cost Index.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves a 14% increase in existing Child Care Facility Impact Fee, as reflected in the attached fee structure. * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Fee Structure for Child Care Facility Impact Fee, as established by South San Francisco City Council Resolution Number (matrix shows the original fees as originally adopted in 2001, and as increased by Resolution Number _ Residential Uses - low density - medium density - high density - other residential $l736/ooit $1979/unit $ 1630/unit $1858/unit $1621/ooit $1851 unit $1.12/gsf $1.28/gsf Commercial/Industrial - commercial/retail - hotel/visitor services - office/R&D - other non-residential $0.60/gsf $0. 68/gsf $0.16/gsf $0.18/gsf $0.50/gsf $0.57/gsf $O.17/gsf $0.54/gsf - ~'ttl ~ S C (""l :>-< ~ ~ g ~4l!!Q"~~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #10 DATE: September 27,2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Steele, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 2005-06 YEAR-END FINANCIAL RESULTS AND BUDGET CLOSING RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached budget amendment resolution authorizing various budget actions that allow staff to close the books on fiscal year 2005-06. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: While the 2005-00 fi~cal year results have not been audited, t.l}e numbers are virtua!!y final. General Fund revenues have come in $1,392,000 higher than the amended budget (a difference of 2.36%), reflecting the continued improving economy, with higher than expected revenues in property taxes, good fourth quarter results in building and fire permits, strong demand for City services, especially in childcare, and the effect of higher interest rates on the City's invested funds. General Fund expenditures came in $356,000 higher than budget, due to Fire Department overtime related to Hurricane Katrina assistance (the costs of which were offset as FEMA reimbursement revenue) and due to Police costs resulting from military pay made to officers on active duty. Overall, General Fund Reserves have increased by $3.7 million over 2004-05. Revenues: Property Taxes came in $306,000 higher than budgeted, primarily due to higher supplemental payments, particularly in the last month of the year. Supplemental payments are those not in the property tax roll at the beginning of the year, so they cannot be forecasted accurately. Since they vary from year to year, staff estimates them conservatively. Sales Taxes were $116,000 below the amended budget, which had been adjusted upward in earlier quarterly budget amendments to reflect the improving local economy. Over the fiscal year, the City's sales tax revenues were better than originally expected, due to an improving economy, higher gasoline prices, and a boost from cyclical capital expenditure purchases in the local biotech industry. While biotech sales generate no sales tax, when large capital equipment for labs is purchased out of state, the use tax (equivalent to sales tax) accrues to South San Staff Report Subject: 2005-06 Year End Financial Results and Budget Closing Page 2 of 4 Francisco. This source of use tax IS fairly volatile, depending on the long-term research projections of each company. Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) were $120,000 over the amended budget. For the year, TOT was $950,000 over the previous year, due in part to the added 1 % tax, but due mainly to the improved economic climate in which the local hotels could raise taxable room rates as occupancy increased. (As a comparison, 05-06 TOT revenues were still more than $500,000 below the high point of $6,000,000 in TOT revenue received in 00-01, when the tax was only 8%.) Building and Fire Permits came in $453,000 over budget. These revenues are conservatively predicted because the revenues depend on the timing of construction projects in the City __ construction projects can be delayed by developers depending on changing economic projections, and large projects can cause a one-time spike in revenues. June was a very strong month, with over $475,000 in permit revenue. Within this category, Building Inspection Permits came in $335,000 over budget, while Fire Permits came in $118,000 over budget. Charges for Service came in $317,000 over budget. While Basic Life Support ambulance service (BLS) revenues still fell short of the reduced amended budget, the regular Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance revenues offset the deficit. Recreation Department fees, especially for childcare, provided the bulk of the additional revenue. Details on these revenue line items are below: Amended Year-End Budget Actual Difference % Difference BLS Revenues $400,000 $377,688 ($22,312) (5.6% ) ALS Revenues $1,150,000 $1,235,083 $85,083 7.4% Childcare Fees $975,000 $1,171,354 $196,354 20.1% All Other Recreation $1,511,400 $1,557,352 $ 45,952 3.0% Revenue Interest earnings were up by $188,000, due to climbing interest rates. Expenditures: General Fund Expenditures came in $356,000 higher than budget due to employee costs arising from the reimbursed Hurricane Katrina assistance by the Fire Department and Police Department Military Pay. No overall significant General Fund budget savings were realized, as is typical in most years, due to higher gasoline prices absorbed by operating departments and due to the Staff Report Subject: 2005-06 Year End Financial Results and Budget Closing Page 3 of 4 impact of several years of static budgets for non-salaries, with higher prices putting more pressure on departmental budgets. Budget Amendment: Several budget amendment items are needed in order to close the books on 2005-06. They are described below. General Fund: The two General Fund departments mentioned above (Fire and Police) went over budget, requiring $382,000 in increased budget appropriations: · $281,000 is for FEMA-reimbursed overtime for fire personnel responding to the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts, · $101,000 is for military pay for police officers in active duty, per Council policy. In addition, additional transfers to the Self Insurance Fund from the General Fund are recommended. Each year, staff reviews outstanding liability claims and adjusts funding in the Self Insurance Fund accordingly. Staff believes it would be prudent to have the General Fund transfer an additional $450,000 to the Self Insurance Fund to maintain that fund at a level to cover 50% of expected claims, consistent with the Council approved reserves policy. Staff believes the cash projected to be on hand in the Self Insurance Fund, $2.3 million, would cover 50% funding for future workers' compensation and general liability claims, including several large pending lawsuits. An additional transfer from the Sewer Fund was done within the Sewer Fund's existing operating budget to cov'er the portion of Self Insurance Fund expenses that were attributable to legal settlements associated with Wet Weather construction projects. No budget amendment is needed for the Sewer Fund. Capital Improvement Fund: $250,000 needs to be added to the Oyster Point Flyover/Hookramps capital project, funded from Oyster Point developer fees. In order to close out this capital project, additional dollars are needed to pay for additional requirements from Caltrans, including a crash point attenuator, additional fencing, a retaining wall, and additional riparian mitigation and monitoring. $3.0 million is recommended to be drawn down from the recent Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Bond sale to pay back a portion of the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (T A) loan for the Flyover and Hookramps. Taking this action will not provide any additional budget for expenditures for the project, but rather appropriates dollars to payoff a portion of the T A loan early. The TA loan was advanced to the City to help with cash flow, since developer fees come in unevenly as development occurs. Since the City is paying the T A about 6% in interest on this loan, and the RDA bonds are under 5%, it is cost effective to pay the T A back with RDA bond proceeds. Staff will set up an advance on the City's books internally to pay back the Redevelopment Funds over time with interest as additional Oyster Point developer fees come in. Staff Report Subject: 2005-06 Year End Financial Results and Budget Closing Page 4 of 4 After this loan repayment, the City will still owe the T A approximately $4.4 million for their loan, which must be repaid by October 1, 2008. To the extent insufficient developer fees come in to retire this loan, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency bonds or tax increment be used for this purpose. Otherwise, the General Fund would have to fund the difference. This is consistent with the Shearwater project area redevelopment plans, which had identified the Oyster Point interchange as a funding priority to improve traffic circulation and foster development. FISCAL IMPACT: The year-end balance for the General Fund Undesignated Reserve is estimated at $5.9 million, with total General Fund Discretionary Reserves estimated at $16.2 million. CONCLUSION: Taking the actions in the attached budget amendment resolution will allow staff to close the books on fiscal year 2005-06. Prepared by: ~ . Jim S eele Finance Director APprOVedbY:~ \. (~~) Y . Nagel City Manager A IT ACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit A, Budget Amendment Items Attachment 1 - Preliminary General Fund Operating Results 2005-06 Attachment 2 - Total General Fund Operating & Capital Budget, and Projected Changes to General Fund Reserves JS/BN:ed RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIOUS BUDGET ACTIONS THAT ALLOW STAFF TO CLOSE THE BOOKS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 WHEREAS, staff recommends authorizing various budget changes as shown in Exhibit A attached to this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves various budget actions shown in Exhibit A that allow staff to close books for the 2005-06 fiscal year. Taking these actions will result in a General Fund Undesignated Reserve of approximately $5.9 million as of June 30, 2006. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of , 2006 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Budge Action to Close books 05-06 - 9-21-06 (405-001) Exhibit A Budget Amendment Items: General Fund: 1. Increase Fire Department budget by $281,000 2. Increase Police Department budget by $101,000 3. Authorize transfers from the General Fund to the Self Insurance Fund of $450,000 4. Confirm the final amended budget for General Fund revenues and expenditures, as shown in the Amended Budget column of Exhibit A-I. Capital Improvement Funds: 1. Appropriate an additional $250,000 to the Oyster Point Flyover/Hookramps Capital Project. 2. Authorize repayment of $3.0 million of outstanding loan from to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. Loan payment to be authorized from the 2006 Redevelopment Agency Bond Proceeds, with an advance to be set up on the City's books between the Redevelopment Funds and the Oyster Point Developer Fee fund to reflect this loan payment. Funds may be carried over to 2006-07 to make the payment if necessary. Exhibit A-1 Preliminary Year End, 2005-06 General Fund, Operating Budget Unaudited Change Year-End Adopted Amended Year-End from Actual Budget Budget Actual Amended % 2004-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 Budget Change Revenues and Other Financing Sources Property Taxes 11,076,530 11,538,588 11,470,404 11,776,863 306,459 2.7% ERAF One Time Refund from County 1,337,037 650,000 1,871,955 1,871,955 0 0.0% Sales Tax 10,975,749 11,525,384 12,367,089 12,251 ,284 (115,804) -0.9% Transient Occupancy Tax 4,518,293 4,800,000 5,350,000 5,469,708 119,708 2.2% Motor Vehicle In Lieu Fees 2,977,292 2,735,600 4,447,162 4,460,748 13,586 0.3% Revenue from Other Agencies 1,212,142 1 ,238,536 1,480,536 1,526,637 46,101 3.1% Franchise Fees 2,710,213 2,850,000 2,800,000 2,808,554 8,554 0.3% Business License 1,771,282 1,665,000 1,710,000 1,787,569 77 ,569 4.5% Building and Fire Permits 2,479,694 2,750,000 3,125,000 3,577,739 452,739 14.5% Charges for Services 4,970,407 5,456,900 5,419,400 5,736,520 317,120 5.9% Fines 971,050 1,083,000 920,000 889,085 (30,915) -3.4% Interest 433,264 476,000 525,000 767,495 242,495 46.2% Net Change Investment Value -5,750 (54,909) (54,909) Rent 2,485,932 2,450,000 2,520,000 2,526,995 6,995 0.3% Administrative Charges 2,133,950 1,986,774 1,986,774 1,986,774 (0) 0.0% Other 688,986 590,981 654,004 686,532 32,528 5.0% Transfers In 2,837,897 2,123,500 2,285,921 2,256,378 (29,543) . -1.3% Total Revenues: 53,573,969 53,920,263 58,933,245 60,325,928 1,392,683 2.4% Plus Prior Year Carryovers 371,816 Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources $ 53,573,969 $ 53,920,263 $ 59,305,061 $ 60,325,928 $ 1,392,683 2.3% Expenditures Administration 5,245,715 5,047,150 4,893,525 4,882,344 11,181 0.2% Economic & Comm. Dev. 3,604,232 3,204,298 3,433,760 3,430,070 3,690 0.1% Fire 13,879,185 14,326,262 14,546,782 14,826,794 (280,013) -1.9% Library 4,413,823 3,973,722 4,069,252 4,064,638 4,614 0.1% Police 15,114,206 16,022,135 16,158,421 16,259,302 (100,881 ) -0.6% Public Works (formerly Maintenance Services) 5,440,885 7,157,884 7,138,493 7,136,058 2,435 0.0% Recreation and Community Services 5,072,491 4,524,562 4,634,562 4,631,304 3,258 0.1% Subtotal, Operating Budget Expenditures 52,770,537 54,256,013 54,874,794 55,230,511 (355,717) -0.6% Net Operating Budget Impact $ 803,432 $ (335,750) $ 4,430,267 $ 5,095,417 Exhibit A-2 Total General Fund Operating and Capital Budget, & Projected Changes to General Fund Reserves Preliminary Year End, 2005-06 Net Operating Budget Impact (from Table I) Less Transfers to Capital Projects: Less Transfers to Debt Service Year End 2004-05 803,432 (338,493) (136,154) Net Impact on General Fund Reserves Less Transfers out to Self Insurance Fund for High ClaimslSettelements $ 328,785 $ (547,750) $ 3,493,774 $ 3,681,474 IGeneral Fund Reserves Projection I. Discretionary Reservesl Liquid Reserves Available Emergencies Economic Contingencies Designated for future Economic Development and Capital Projects Undesignated Reserve Subtotal, Discretionary (Available) Reserves II. Non-Discretionary Reservesl Reserves Already Committed Encumbrances Advances to Other Funds Inventory and Other Appropriated Capital Projects Subtotal, Non Discretionary (Committed) Reserves Total General Fund Reserves 1,100,000 3,500,000 3,600,000 4,125,250 Unaudited Adopted Amended Year-end Budget Budget Actual 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 (335,750) 4,430,267 5,095,417 (82,000) (806,493) (806,493) (130,000) (130,000) (157,450) (450,000) 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 3,800,000 4,125,000 4,211,000 3,600,000 4,950,000 4,950,000 3,893,030 6,159,554 5,874,390 $ 12,325,250 $ 12,393,030 $ 16,434,554 $ 16,235,390 381 ,400 40,300 $ 283,830 705,530 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 476,864 386,864 90,000 90,000 90,000 $ 13,030,780 $ 12,483,030 $ 16,524,554 $ 16,712,254