The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03.22.2023@0600 Regular CCWednesday, March 22, 2023 6:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA City Council BUENAFLOR NICOLAS, Mayor (District 3) MARK NAGALES, Vice Mayor (District 2) MARK ADDIEGO, Councilmember (District 1) JAMES COLEMAN, Councilmember (District 4) EDDIE FLORES, Councilmember (District 5) ROSA GOVEA ACOSTA, City Clerk FRANK RISSO, City Treasurer SHARON RANALS, Interim City Manager SKY WOODRUFF, City Attorney Regular Meeting Agenda 1 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda How to observe the Meeting (no public comment): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26, Comcast, Channel 27, or AT&T, Channel 99 2) https://www.ssf.net/government/city-council/video-streaming-city-and-council-meetings/city-council ZOOM LINK BELOW -NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED Join Zoom meeting: https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/88636346631(Enter your email and name) Webinar ID: 886 3634 6631 Join by Telephone: +1 669 900 6833 Teleconference participation is offered in the meeting via Zoom as a courtesy to the public. If no members of the City Council are attending the meeting via teleconference, and a technical error or outage occurs on the teleconference feed, the City Council will continue the meeting in public in the Council Chambers. How to submit written Public Comment before the City Council Meeting: Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting via the eComment tab by 4:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Use the eComment portal by clicking on the following link : https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings or by visiting the City Council meeting's agenda page. eComments are also directly sent to the iLegislate application used by City Council and staff. How to provide Public Comment during the City Council Meeting: COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER 1. By Zoom: When the Clerk calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on "raise hand." Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 2. By Phone: Enter the conference ID fund on the agenda. When the Clerk calls for the item on which you wish to speak, Click *9 to raise a hand to speak. Click *6 to unmute when called. 3. In Person: Complete a Digital Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber ’s. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at all-cc@ssf.net. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability -related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at all-cc@ssf.net, 72-hours before the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 2 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PRESENTATIONS Proclamation recognizing March as Irish American Heritage Month. (Mayor Flor Nicolas) 1. Certificate recognizing Marian Manahan, El Camino High School student and award-winning artist. (Mayor Flor Nicolas) 2. Proclamation recognizing April as Fair Housing Month. (Mayor Flor Nicolas)3. Certificate recognizing March as National Nutrition Month and recognizing Second Harvest Food Bank. (Mayor Flor Nicolas) 4. Certificate recognizing Spark of Creation Studio. (Mayor Flor Nicolas)5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Under the Public Comment section of the agenda, members of the public may speak on any item not listed on the Agenda and on items listed under the Consent Calendar. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting. Written comments on agenda items received prior to 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud. If there appears to be a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce speaking time to limit the total amount of time for public comments (Gov. Code sec. 54954.3(b)(1).). Speakers that are not in compliance with the City Council's rules of decorum will be muted. COUNCIL COMMENTS/REQUESTS Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 3 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR Matters under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted by one motion and without discussion. If, however, any Council member (s) wishes to comment on an item, they may do so before action is taken on the Consent Calendar. Following comments, if a Council member wishes to discuss an item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up in order after adoption of the Consent Calendar. Motion to approve the Minutes for March 8, 2023. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk)6. Motion to accept the 2022 Housing Element and General Plan Annual Progress Report and authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (ORP) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). (Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner and Stephanie Skangos, Associate Planner) 7. Motion to receive and file the City’s Housing Successor Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) 8. Report regarding a resolution approving Parcel Map 22-1236 for the purposes of dedicating new public easements and splitting the existing parcel into three lots as part of the 180 El Camino Real Redevelopment project; and authorizing the recording of said Parcel Map and all related documents with the San Mateo County Recorder. (Jason Hallare, Senior Civil Engineer) 9. Resolution approving Parcel Map 22-1236 for the purposes of dedicating new public easements and splitting the existing parcel into three lots as part of the 180 El Camino Real Redevelopment project; and authorizing the recording of said Parcel Map and all related documents with the San Mateo County Recorder. 9a Report regarding adoption of a resolution approving a third amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates and amending the total budget for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project. (Angel Torres, Senior Civil Engineer) 10. Resolution approving an amendment to Kimley-Horn and Associate’s contract to provide additional design support during construction for an additional amount of $88,344.90, for a total amount not to exceed $448,064.90, extending the contract term, and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000, for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project (Project No. tr2002) 10a. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 4 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding a resolution authorizing an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers program in South San Francisco and approving Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) 11. Resolution authorizing an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers program in South San Francisco and approving Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. 11a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project (project number pk1402), and amending the Parks and Recreation Department’s Operating Budget pursuant to budget amendment #23.054. (Greg Mediati, Director, Parks and Recreation Department) 12. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project (project number pk1402), and amending the Parks and Recreation Department’s Operating Budget pursuant to Budget Amendment #23.054. 12a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans. (Christopher Espiritu, Senior Transportation Planner) 13. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans and amending the Economic and Community Development Department’s Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating Budget via Budget Amendment #23.053. 13a. Report regarding a resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency relating to major storm and flooding events. (Sharon Ranals, City Manager and Sky Woodruff, City Attorney) 14. Resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency relating to major storm and flooding events. 14a. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 5 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Report regarding approval of a resolution providing a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project. (Christina Fernandez, Chief Sustainability Officer) 15. Resolution approving a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation Project 15a. Report regarding an ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to change the regular time for the Planning Commission from 7:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. (Adena Friedman, Principal Planner and Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner) 16. Ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, regarding the start time of Planning Commission meetings 16a. Report regarding an ordinance to amend Title 15 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to adopt a reach code for all-electric nonresidential new construction and enhanced electric vehicle charging infrastructure. (Christina Fernandez, Chief Sustainability Officer; Phillip Perry, Chief Building Official; Leila Silver, Integrative Designs 360) 17. Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.22 “Green Building Code” of Title 15 “Buildings and Construction” of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to Adopt Local “Reach Codes” for Residential and Non-Residential Developments to Increase Building Efficiency and Increase Requirements Related to Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. 17a. Report regarding the status of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South San Francisco and the South San Francisco Unified School District. (Scott Campbell, Chief of Police) 18. Report regarding a resolution to authorize application to and participation in the California Department of Housing and Community Development Prohousing Designation Program (Adena Friedman, Principal Planner and Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner) 19. Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizing application to and participation in the Prohousing Designation Program 19a. Page 6 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 6 March 22, 2023City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding a resolution affirming the City’s support for Bridge Housing Corporation’s application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Grant program, authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with Bridge Housing Corporation, and approving Budget Amendment Number 23.057 appropriating $250,000 to acquire an EV sub-compact sweeper. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) 20. Resolution affirming the City’s support for Bridge Housing Corporation’s application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Grant program, authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with Bridge Housing Corporation, and approving Budget Amendment Number 23.057 appropriating $250,000 to acquire an EV sub-compact sweeper. 20a. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL – COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT Page 7 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023 7 LIBRARY | PARK & RECREATION PROJECT UPDATE MARCH 2023 EXTERIOR VIEW FROM PARK VIEW FROM FIELD VIEW FROM FIELD FIRST FLOOR LOBBY FIRST FLOOR LOBBY MEDIUM EVENT SPACE MEDIUM EVENT SPACE LARGE EVENT SPACE LARGE EVENT SPACE LARGE EVENT SPACE LARGE EVENT SPACE COUNCIL CHAMBER / THEATER EXTERIOR FROM SECOND FLOOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER / THEATER INTERIOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER / THEATER INTERIOR DISCOVERY CENTER –DIGITAL STUDIO DISCOVERY CENTER –DIGITAL STUDIO DISCOVERY CENTER –MAKER SPACE DISCOVERY CENTER –MAKER SPACE DISCOVERY CENTER –MAKER SPACE DISCOVERY CENTER –MAKER SPACE YOUTH LIBRARY YOUTH LIBRARY LIBRARY –YOUNG ADULT AREA LIBRARY –YOUNG ADULT AREA CHILDREN’S CLASSROOM CHILDREN’S CLASSROOM CHILDREN’S CLASSROOM CHILDREN’S CLASSROOM ART ROOM / CREATOR’S STUDIO ART ROOM / CREATOR’S STUDIO DANCE CLASSROOM DANCE CLASSROOM THIRD FLOOR ADULT LIBRARY ENTRANCE THIRD FLOOR ADULT LIBRARY ENTRANCE ADA PARKING DIAGRAM LIBRARY | PARKS & RECREATION SITE PLAN PARKING SPACES :: ~200 SURFACE LOT :: 108 GARAGE :: 20 OAK AVE :: ~ 40 STREET :: 34 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-225 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:1. Proclamation recognizing March as Irish American Heritage Month.(Mayor Flor Nicolas) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™8 Dated: March 22, 2023 RECOGNITION OF MARCH AS IRISH AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH WHEREAS, in March, we celebrate Irish American Heritage Month to recognize the Irish immigrants who sought a new beginning in the United States; and WHEREAS, Irish-American Heritage Month was first celebrated by proclamation of the President in 1991. It seemed natural to choose March since Saint Patrick Day falls on March 17, for the month-long recognition of the contributions that Irish immigrants and their descendants have made to U.S. society; and WHEREAS, it’s important to reflect on the anti-immigrant sentiment that was often faced by new Irish-Americans, largely a result of their Catholicism, which clashed with the predominantly Protestant backgrounds of the majority of families whose members had been among the original colonists; and WHEREAS, this month we recognize not only the overcoming of those obstacles by Irish Americans but also the incredible breadth and depth of their contributions to American society, from the Union’s edge over the Confederacy in the Civil War to the intellectual contributions that have kept our country on the top tiers of accomplishment; and WHEREAS, their pride lives on in business owners, scientists, and labor leaders who hold dear the Irish belief that everyone deserves to be treated with dignity; and WHEREAS, their courage runs deep in so many first responders, public servants, and brave service members who defend our lives and liberties – the same liberties that so many Irish immigrants and Irish Americans helped preserve and protect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby proclaim March 2023 as Irish American Heritage Month. ___________________________________ Buenaflor Nicolas, Mayor, District 3 ___________________________________ Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor, District 2 ___________________________________ Mark Addiego, Councilmember, District 1 ___________________________________ James Coleman, Councilmember, District 4 ___________________________________ Eddie Flores, Councilmember, District 5 9 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-223 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:2. Certificate recognizing Marian Manahan, El Camino High School student and award-winning artist.(Mayor Flor Nicolas) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™10 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Certificate of Recognition MARIAN MANAHAN The City Council of South San Francisco does hereby congratulate Marian Manahan, an El Camino High School student, for being selected to participate in a mural that will be painted in the entrance of the SMC Office of Education. Marian’s artwork will be transformed into a cohesive painting in collaboration with a muralist. The mural will honor recently retired Congresswoman Jackie Speier and SMC Supervisor Don Horsley. You are an inspiration to the community! Presented on this 22nd day of March 2023 by the City Council of South San Francisco. Buenaflor Nicolas, Mayor Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor Mark Addiego, Councilmember James Coleman, Councilmember Eddie Flores, Councilmember 11 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-224 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. Proclamation recognizing April as Fair Housing Month. (Mayor Flor Nicolas) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™12 Dated: March 22, 2023 RECOGNITION OF APRIL AS FAIR HOUSING MONTH WHEREAS, The Fair Housing Act, enacted on April 11, 1968, enshrined into federal law the goal of eliminating racial segregation and ending housing discrimination in the United States; and WHEREAS, The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, and disability, and commits recipients of federal funding to affirmatively further fair housing in communities; and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco is committed to the mission and intent of Congress to provide fair and equal housing opportunities for all; and WHEREAS, our social fabric, the economy, health, and environment are strengthened in diverse, inclusive communities; and WHEREAS, more than 50 years after the passage of the Fair Housing Act, discrimination persists, and many communities remain segregated; and WHEREAS, acts of housing discrimination and barriers to equal housing opportunity are offensive to a common sense of decency and fairness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby proclaim April 2023 as Fair Housing Month in South San Francisco as an inclusive community committed to fair housing, and to promoting appropriate activities by private and public entities to provide and advocate for equal housing opportunities for all residents and prospective residents. _____________________________ Buenaflor Nicolas, Mayor, District 3 ______________________________ Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor, District 2 _________________________________ Mark Addiego, Councilmember, District 1 ___________________________________ James Coleman, Councilmember, District 4 _________________________________ Eddie Flores, Councilmember, District 5 13 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-226 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:4. Certificate recognizing March as National Nutrition Month and recognizing Second Harvest Food Bank. (Mayor Flor Nicolas) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™14 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Certificate of Recognition MARCH AS NATIONAL NUTRITION MONTH The City Council of South San Francisco does hereby recognize Claribel Chavez and Second Harvest of Silicon Valley for their outstanding dedication and commitment to ending hunger in our community through generous, healthy, food distribution events and other food connection services in South San Francisco. Their partnership and collaboration brings us closer to building a hunger-free community! Presented on this 22nd day of March 2023 by the City Council of South San Francisco. Buenaflor Nicolas, Mayor Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor Mark Addiego, Councilmember James Coleman, Councilmember Eddie Flores, Councilmember 15 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-227 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:5. Certificate recognizing Spark of Creation Studio.(Mayor Flor Nicolas) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™16 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Certificate of Recognition SPARK OF CREATION STUDIO The City Council of South San Francisco does hereby congratulate Spark of Creation Studio for receiving the Freddie G Excellence in Music Award at the 2023 Junior Theater Festival West. Your storytelling and encouragement showed to others is admirable. You are an inspiration to our community! Presented on this 22nd day of March 2023 by the City Council of South San Francisco. Buenaflor Nicolas, Mayor Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor Mark Addiego, Councilmember James Coleman, Councilmember Eddie Flores, Councilmember 17 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-251 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #: City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/22/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™18 ID Start time Language Name / Nombre Would you like to speak If you would like to speak on an agenda item(s), Enter the Agenda Item Number(s) below. If adding more than one item, please add a comma between each number.Por favor ingrese el número de artíc...1 3/22/23 14:56:03 English (United States) Cynthia Marcopulos Yes / Si No2 3/22/23 17:53:34 English (United States) Tom Carney Yes / Si Item 17,3 3/22/23 19:53:25 English (United States) Julio Garcia Yes / Si 154 3/22/23 19:55:05 English (United States) Ethan Mizzi Yes / Si 15 Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC - Public Comment 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 On March 21, 2023, the City received a writen public comment for the City Council’s regular mee�ng of March 22, 2023, in the form of photocopied pages from the book It’s Perfectly Normal: Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, Gender, and Sexual Health. Because the City does not have permission from the copyright owners of the book, the photocopied pages are not being distributed on the City’s website or through its agenda system. Members of the public interested in viewing the photocopies may do so in the Office of the City Clerk during normal business hours. The City Clerk’s Office is located in City Hall at 400 Grand Avenue. 67 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-222 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:2 Item #:6. Motion to approve the Minutes for March 8, 2023. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™68 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Nicolas called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmember Addiego, present Councilmember Coleman, present Councilmember Flores, present Vice Mayor Nagales, present Mayor Nicolas, present PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cynthia Marcopulos led the pledge. AGENDA REVIEW At the request of Council, Administrative Business Item No. 14 was moved to be heard after Consent Calendar items. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF • Police Chief Scott Campbell • Angela Duldulao, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation recognizing March as Women’s History Month. (Flor Nicolas, Mayor) Mayor Nicolas read the proclamation into the record. President of Women’s Club Corrine Burgess accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council. 2. Proclamation recognizing Women in Construction Week, March 5 - 11, 2023. (Flor Nicolas, Mayor) Mayor Nicolas read the proclamation into the record. Denise Redmond Crossland with National Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC) accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 2023 6:00 p.m. Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA Via Zoom 69 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2023 MINUTES PAGE 2 3. Presentation from Alliance for Community Empowerment (ALLICE) Kumares & Kumpares. (Flor Nicolas, Mayor) Jennifer Jimenez-Wong with Alliance for Community Empowerment (ALLICE) provided an overview of the organization. 4. Presentation by Peninsula Clean Energy on energy programs and community benefits. (Jan Pepper, Chief Executive Officer, Peninsula Clean Energy) Chief Executive Officer of Peninsula Clean Energy Jan Pepper provided an overview of the programs and community benefits available. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: In-Person: • Cynthia Marcopulos • Cory David • Kenneth Do • Nannette Cole Via Zoom: • Tom Carney The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment: • Claudia Melteff PUBLIC COMMENTS – AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: In-Person: • Fionnola Villamejor (Items No. 5 and 7) The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment: • Andrew Montenegro (Item No. 13) • Eric Zigman, Golden Gate Regional Center (Item No. 13) • Kiana Simmons, Housing Leadership Council (Item No. 13) • Ben McMullan, Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (Item No. 13) • Edith and Ulisess Arias (Item No. 13) • Geraldine (Item No. 13) • Dennise Jauregui, Housing Choices (Item No. 13) • Melissa Trujillo (Item No. 13) • Robena Roidmaier (Item No. 13) • Sabine Roidmaier-Sazio (Item No. 13) • Sezuki Mazza (Item No. 13) • Sheraden Nicholau, CA State Council on Developmental Disabilities (Item No. 13) • Bryan Neider, Ability Path (Item No. 13) All electronic comments received were made a part of the record of the meeting. 70 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2023 MINUTES PAGE 3 COUNCIL COMMENTS/REQUESTS Councilmember Addiego recognized International Women's Day and noted the importance of recognizing women's history. He shared his attendance at the South San Francisco Unified School District Portrait of Graduate event and the South San Francisco St. Patrick's Day Celebration dinner. Vice Mayor Nagales provided an update on the Caltrans SM 1010 Express Lanes Project. He requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Hector Camacho Jr., father of SMC Board of Education Trustee Hector Camacho. Councilmember Flores shared his virtual attendance at the South San Francisco Unified School District Portrait of a Graduate event. He shared that the ROEM Housing application period opened March 6th and will close April 3rd for the Grand and Linden developments for more information visit: mysmchousing.com He requested to adjourn in memory of South San Francisco resident Cuauhtemoc Alvarado. Councilmember Coleman shared his attendance at the South San Francisco Library Holi Color Party. He noted his participation in the FIXIN San Mateo County grassroots organization, working to enact meaningful civilian oversight of the SMC Sheriff's Department. He apprised residents of District 4 of the closure of Brentwood Park. Mayor Nicolas thanked Police Chief Campbell for the community update. She shared her attendance at the South San Francisco Unified School District Portrait of Graduate event and the South San Francisco St. Patrick's Day Celebration dinner. She congratulated Elaine Garbarino for her work in organizing the event. CONSENT CALENDAR The City Clerk duly read the Consent Calendar, after which Council voted and engaged in discussion of specific item as follows. 5. Motion to approve the Minutes for February 11, 2023, and February 22, 2023. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) 6. Report regarding Resolution No. 37-2023 authorizing the City Manager to execute the first amendment to purchasing contract with vendor One Workplace of Santa Clara, CA for the Civic Campus Phase 2: Library, Parks & Recreation and Community Theater/Council Chamber (pf 2207), in an amount not to exceed $2,103,470.88. (Jacob Gilchrist, Director of Capital Projects) 7. Report regarding Resolution No. 38-2023 authorizing the acceptance of a donation of 591 meals to the City of South San Francisco from Foundry & Lux on behalf of Healthpeak Life Science Properties, Inc. to provide food for City staff during the holiday season. (Maryjo Nuñez, Lead for America Fellow, City Manager’s Office.) 8. Report regarding Resolution No. 39-2023 authorizing the acceptance of the 2023 San Mateo County Summer Enrichment Grant in the amount of $44,016 and amending the Parks and Recreation Department Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget pursuant to budget amendment #23.051. (Angela Duldulao, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation) 71 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2023 MINUTES PAGE 4 9. Report regarding Resolution No. 40-2023 approving the First Amendment to Purchase Agreement with Dell Marketing L.P. in an additional amount of $27,560, and a not to exceed amount of $267,957 for the purchase of additional computer equipment and authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Purchase Agreement; and authorizing a total purchase budget of $297,957 with authorization for the City Manager to execute future amendments in an amount not to exceed $30,000 (Tony Barrera, Director of Information Technology) 10. Report regarding Resolution No. 41-2023 authorizing the acceptance of $53,358.28 in grant funding from the State of California for Officer Wellness and Mental Health and amending the Police Department’s Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 by approving Budget Amendment #23.052. (Scott Campbell, Chief of Police) Item No. 10: At the request of Councilmember Addiego, Police Chief Campbell gave an overview of the department's efforts to address the mental health needs of officers. Motion – Councilmember Addiego /Second - Councilmember Coleman: To approve Consent Calendar 5-10 by roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Addiego, Coleman, and Flores, Vice Mayor Nagales, and Mayor Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 14. Report regarding Resolution No. 42-2023 approving an employment agreement between the City of South San Francisco and Sharon Ranals for service as City Manager and amending the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Salary Schedule to reflect changes in the salary for the City Manager position. (Sky Woodruff, City Attorney) City Attorney Woodruff presented the report. The City Council noted the valuable contributions that Interim City Manager Ranals has brought to the city with 42 years of service and highlighted her institutional knowledge, leadership, and passion for public service. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: In-Person: • Ethan Mizzi Zoom: • Mina Richardson Motion – Councilmember Addiego/Second - Councilmember Coleman: To approve Resolution No. 42-2023 approving an employment agreement between the City of South San Francisco and Sharon Ranals for service as City Manager and amending the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Salary Schedule to reflect changes in the salary for the City Manager position, by roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Addiego, Coleman, and Flores, Vice Mayor Nagales, and Mayor Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSTAIN: None City Manager Ranals thanked the Council for the opportunity and expressed her commitment to leading the city, of which she has been a part for 42 years in various roles. 72 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2023 MINUTES PAGE 5 PUBLIC HEARING 11. Report regarding holding a Public Hearing on the City’s housing, community, and economic development needs for the 2023-2027 Five-Year Consolidated Plan and 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan and providing direction to the Community Development Block Grant Standing Committee regarding funding priorities. (Heather Ruiz, Management Analyst II) Vice Mayor Nagales recused himself from the item and stepped out of the Council Chambers at 7:56 p.m. Management Analyst Heather Ruiz introduced Frankie Lewington of Root Policy and Research who presented the report. Public Hearing opened: 8:06 p.m. The following individual provided an overview of their respective programs: • Paul Cruz, Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities • Karen Ferguson, Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) • Dr. Ana Avendano, El Concilio of San Mateo County • Cecilia Chu, Friends for Youth • Mike Reza, Health Mobile • HIP Housing • David Carducci – Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County • Sarah Fields – LifeMoves • Bernadette Mellott – Ombudsman Advocates • Mary Geisller – Peninsula Family Service • Carole Conn – Project Sentinel • Margaret Phillips – Rape Trauma Services • Melissa Lukin – Rebuilding Together • Amanda Anthony – Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center • Telia Wells Lawrence – Samaritan House • Alyssa Canfield – Star Vista PUBLIC COMMENTS - The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: Via Zoom: • Ronnie Public Hearing opened: 9:03 p.m. Vice Mayor Nagales returned to the Council Chambers at 9:05 p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Motion to authorize the Mayor to send a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1319 (Wicks), Bay Area Housing Finance Authority Clean-Up Legislation. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) Economic and Community Development Director Selander presented the report and answered questions from the Council. The Council requested amendments to the letter of support. Motion – Councilmember Coleman/Second Councilmember Addiego: To authorize the Mayor to send a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1319 (Wicks), Bay Area Housing Finance Authority Clean- Up Legislation with amendments referencing Article 34 prioritization, by roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Addiego, Coleman, and Flores, Vice Mayor Nagales, and Mayor Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSTAIN: None 73 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2023 MINUTES PAGE 6 13. Report regarding Resolution No. 43-2023 approving the first amendment to the loan agreement between Baden Station Investors, LLC, and the City of South San Francisco to modify the terms of an existing $4,050,000 loan for the development of 36 affordable housing units at 428-432 Baden. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) Economic and Community Development Director Selander and Jim Rendler with For the Future Housing presented the report and answered questions from the Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS - The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: Via Zoom: • Kalisha Webster • Sheraden Nicholau • Benjamin McMullan • Tom Carney • Ronnie Motion – Councilmember Flores /Second Councilmember Coleman: To approve Resolution No. 43- 2023 approving the first amendment to the loan agreement between Baden Station Investors, LLC, and the City of South San Francisco to modify the terms of an existing $4,050,000 loan for the development of 36 affordable housing units at 428-432 Baden, by roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Addiego, Coleman, and Flores, Vice Mayor Nagales, and Mayor Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSTAIN: None ITEMS FROM COUNCIL – COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Addiego noted that the City Council Handbook listed presentations to a total of 15 minutes and suggested that the Mayor review future presentations with the City Manager to reduce the time of presentations. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business Mayor Nicolas adjourned the City Council meeting at 9:47 p.m. *** Adjourned in Memory of Hector Camacho Jr. and Cuauhtémoc Alvarado *** Submitted by: Approved by: Rosa Govea Acosta, MMC, CPMC Buenaflor Nicolas City Clerk Mayor Approved by the City Council: / / 74 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-163 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:7. Motion to accept the 2022 Housing Element and General Plan Annual Progress Report and authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (ORP)and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).(Tony Rozzi,Chief Planner and Stephanie Skangos, Associate Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion: 1.Accept the 2022 Housing Element and General Plan Annual Progress Report; and 2.Authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). BACKGROUND California Government Code Section 65400 requires that an Annual Progress Report (APR)be prepared on the status and progress of implementation of the current Housing Element and General Plan.The APR must be submitted to the City Council,the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR),and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)by April 1st of each year (with a 60-day grace period).The City intends to file the APR before the April 1st deadline. The APR is included as Attachments 1 and 2. Housing Element Compliance with HCD Guidelines The South San Francisco Housing Element covers the period of 2015-2023,and this APR represents the yearly update on housing production.The formatting for the report continues to evolve to match the state’s high priority for new housing units.This APR provides a comprehensive view of entitlement and building permitting activity.The Annual Housing Element Progress Report (Attachment 1 in PDF and Attachment 2 in Excel) includes the following tables: ·Table A - Housing Development Applications Submitted ·Table A2 -Annual Building Activity Report Summary,including completed entitlements,issued building permits, and issued Certificates of Occupancy ·Table B - Summary of Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Progress ·Table C -Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law - Not Applicable to SSF ·Table D - Program Implementation Status ·Table E - Commercial Development Bonus Approved - None ·Table F - Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites for RHNA - None ·Table F2 - Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income - None ·Table G -Locally Owned Lands included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of - None ·Table H -Locally Owned Surplus Sites -None at the moment.All locally owned properties are subject to the Disposition Plan approved by the Successor Agency and reviewed by the Oversight Board City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™75 File #:23-163 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:7. through December 31, 2022. ·Table I - SB9 Units Constructed and Applications for Lot Splits - None ·Table J - Student housing development for lower income students with Density Bonus - None ·Summary Tab of Entitled Units, Submitted Applications, and SB 35 Streamlining Provisions ·Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant Reporting - None The Housing Element Progress Report is informational only and does not change adopted policies or authorize any action or expenditure of funds. Housing Element and Regional Planning California requires each jurisdiction to prepare a Housing Element as part of its General Plan to ensure that all jurisdictions are planning for the projected housing demand throughout the State.Unlike other elements of a General Plan,the Housing Element must be updated by deadlines set by the State.The process begins with the State advising a region of their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA),which is the estimated number of housing units that will be needed over the planning period.A total of 1,864 units are needed for South San Francisco during the 2015-2023 cycle.The Housing Element does not require that these units are built during the allocation cycle.The Housing Element only requires that a city have zoning in place to ensure that the RHNA allocation can be constructed on adequate sites with permissible zoning regulations. Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Summary For 2022,the City is reporting building permit issuance for 336 new residential units,which includes five (5) single-family homes,279 multi-family units (195 for Cadence Phase II;and 84 for the ROEM projects,which were technically issued building permits in the 2021 reporting year but did not get reported through the permitting software correctly),and 52 accessory dwelling units (ADUs).New units that receive building permit issuance during the reporting year are counted towards the current RHNA allocation. In addition to the new units issued a building permit above,a total of 207 new residential units were finaled or issued a certificate of occupancy.This includes one (1)single-family home,four (4)small multi-family units (located within two-to-four unit structures), 172 multi-family units (for 988 El Camino Real), and 30 ADUs. The City also approved Planning entitlements for 583 new residential units,consisting of one (1)single-family home,eight (8)small multi-family units (located within two-to-four unit structures),and 574 multi-family units (99 for the Bertolucci’s Redevelopment Project;183 for 180 El Camino Real;and 292 for Airport Boulevard). Three Planning applications for new housing construction,totaling 547 potential units,were received in 2022, as well, and are currently under review. At the close of 2022,the City had issued building permits for 81%of the expected housing units for the City for a total of 1,511 units out of the 1,864 units allocated through RHNA. This is the reporting year for 2022, the eighth, and last, year of the eight-year reporting cycle: 1.The City has fulfilled expectations for the Above Moderate housing category,issuing a building permit for 1,142 units (RHNA allocation is 705 units). 2.The City has not fulfilled expectations for the Very Low,Low,and Moderate housing categories,issuing building permits for 147 Very Low units,71 Low units,and 151 Moderate units,for a total of 369 units. (RHNA allocation is 565 Very Low units,281 Low units,and 313 Moderate units,for a total of 1,159 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™76 File #:23-163 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:7. units). 3.Understanding the City’s pipeline,it is unlikely that the remainder of very-low-,low-,and moderate- income units will be produced during the RHNA cycle.Issuance of building permits for the L37/Kasa project would produce 158 units in these categories and boost City production of lower income units, but that issuance date could happen at the very end of the current RHNA cycle or occur in the next cycle, Cycle 6 covering the years 2023-2031. 4.There are no penalties for not providing lower income units;however,state legislation SB 35 does create streamlining requirements for cities that do not produce housing.If the latest production report submitted by the agency reflects that fewer units of below moderate housing (80%of median income and below)were issued building permits than required by the RHNA during the reporting period,then any proposed project that provides 50%of the proposed units as affordable will be given streamlined and limited review by state law.South San Francisco falls within this category since building permits have been issued for only 31.8% of lower income categories through 2022. Program Implementation Status Table D of the Housing Element Progress Report provides the status of implementing the current Housing Element programs.Most programs are implemented and monitored on an ongoing basis;however,some programs have deliverable dates prior to the end of the Housing Element cycle of 2023 and those have been completed. General Plan Compliance with Adopted OPR Guidelines The City Council approved and adopted the South San Francisco 2040 General Plan on October 26,2022.The new General Plan contains the following elements:Land Use and Community Design;Planning Sub-Areas;A Prosperous Economy for All;Mobility and Access;Abundant and Accessible Parks and Recreation;Equitable Community Services;Community Health and Environmental Justice;Community Resilience;Climate Protection;Environmental and Cultural Stewardship;and Noise.The previous General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 1999 and contained the State mandated Land Use;Transportation (Circulation);Open Space and Conservation;Noise;and Health and Safety Elements.Additional local elements included Planning Sub- Areas;Parks,Public Facilities and Services;and Economic Development.The respective elements were revised intermittently since the 1999 adoption. OPR adopted General Plan Guidelines in 2003,updated in 2017,for use by local jurisdictions in the preparation of their general plans.The Guidelines are permissive,not mandatory and are quite extensive.For this year’s required reporting on General Plan compliance with OPR Guidelines,the 1999 South San Francisco General Plan was analyzed by staff,as this plan was effective for the majority of the 2022 calendar year.For the 2023 reporting year, and subsequent years, the 2040 General Plan will be analyzed for OPR Compliance. Staff has determined that the 1999 General Plan was in compliance with the adopted OPR Guidelines in most respects;however,it was in partial and non-compliance in several instances.Attachment 2 includes a checklist indicating the degree of compliance of the previous South San Francisco General Plan with each Guideline requirement.The 2040 General Plan update,to be analyzed next year,has brought the City’s General Plan into full compliance with the Guidelines. FUNDING Submittal of the Annual Progress Report to OPR and HCD will have no financial impact on the City but does City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™77 File #:23-163 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:7. Submittal of the Annual Progress Report to OPR and HCD will have no financial impact on the City but does continue to make the City eligible for regional grant funding. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN The yearly reporting on the South San Francisco Housing Element and update on the City’s housing production helps promote the City’s Quality of Life strategic goal in providing a comprehensive view of new housing units produced within the reporting year,with a focus on the number of units produced within four different affordability levels.Additionally,the yearly reporting provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate the adopted programs and policies in the City’s Housing Element and their effectiveness in promoting the creation of new housing and meeting the needs of the City’s residents’ quality of life. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council,by motion,accept the 2022 Housing Element and General Plan Annual Progress Report on the implementation of the Housing Element and General Plan and authorize its transmittal to the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Attachment 1.Annual Housing Element Progress Report for 2022 in PDF format 2.Annual Housing Element Progress Report for 2022 in Excel - tabbed sheets 3.Analysis of South San Francisco General Plan with Adopted Office of Planning and Research Guidelines (PDF format) 4.Staff Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™78 Jurisidiction Name Reporting Calendar Year First Name Last Name Title Click here to download APR Instructions Email Phone Street Address City Zipcode 1_23_23 Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d. 315 MAPLE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 94080 Please Start Here General Information 2022 South San Francisco Contact Information STEPHANIE SKANGOS ASSOCIATE PLANNER STEPHANIE.SKANGOS@SSF.NET 6508778535 Mailing Address Annual Progress Report January 2020 79 Optional: This runs a macro which checks to ensure all required fields are filled out. The macro will create two files saved in the same directory this APR file is saved in. One file will be a copy of the APR with highlighted cells which require information. The other file will be list of the problematic cells, along with a description of the nature of the error. Optional: Save before running. This copies data on Table A2, and creates another workbook with the table split across 4 tabs, each of which can fit onto a single page for easier printing. Running this macro will remove the comments on the column headers, which contain the instructions. Do not save the APR file after running in order to preserve comments once it is reopened. Optional: This macro identifies dates entered that occurred outside of the reporting year. RHNA credit is only given for building permits issued during the reporting year. Link to the online system:https://apr.hcd.ca.gov/APR/login.do Submittal Instructions Please save your file as Jurisdictionname2022 (no spaces). Example: the city of San Luis Obispo would save their file as SanLuisObispo2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APRs) forms and tables must be submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year for the prior calendar year; submit separate reports directly to both HCD and OPR pursuant to Government Code section 65400. There are two options for submitting APRs: 1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System - Please see the link to the online system to the left. This allows you to upload the completed APR form into directly into HCD’s database limiting the risk of errors. If you would like to use the online system, email APR@hcd.ca.gov and HCD will send you the login information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is opr.apr@opr.ca.gov. 2. Email - If you prefer to submit via email, you can complete the excel Annual Progress Report forms and submit to HCD at APR@hcd.ca.gov and to OPR at opr.apr@opr.ca.gov. Please send the Excel workbook, not a scanned or PDF copy of the tables. 80 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Date Application Submitted Total Approved Units by Project Total Disapproved Units by Project Streamlining 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Date Application Submitted+ (see instructions) Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low-Income Deed Restricted Low-Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Total PROPOSED Units by Project Total APPROVED Units by project Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project Was APPLICATION SUBMITTED Pursuant to GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Ddi the housing development application seek incentives or concessions pursuant to Government Code section 65915? Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 37 0 72 0 0 1 624 734 187 0 012311440 012312440 304 GRAND AVE P21-0002 2 to 4 R 7/1/2022 4 4 4 No No 012231200 012231200 613 COMMERCIAL AVE P22-0013 2 to 4 O 6/9/2022 1 2 3 No No 014074010 014074010 7 S LINDEN AVE P22-0024 5+R 11/10/2022 28 54 461 543 No No 012211090 012211090 747 MILLER AVE P22-0073 SFD O 9/6/2022 1 1 No No 014183110 014183110 180 EL CAMINO REAL P21-0126 5+R 4/1/2022 9 18 156 183 183 No No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table A Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas 51 Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bo Applica 10 Housing Development Applications Submitted 81 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Table A2 Streamlining Infill Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction Notes 2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Entitlement Date Approved # of Units issued Entitlements Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued # of Units issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness How many of the units were Extremely Low Income?+ Was Project APPROVED using GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Y/N Infill Units? Y/N+ Assistance Programs for Each Development (may select multiple - see instructions) Deed Restriction Type (may select multiple - see instructions) For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable (see instructions) Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity enter 1000)+ Number of Demolished/Des troyed Units Demolished or Destroyed Units Demolished/De stroyed Units Owner or Renter Total Density Bonus Applied to the Project (Percentage Increase in Total Allowable Units or Total Maximum Allowable Residential Gross Floor Area) Number of Other Incentives, Concessions, Waivers, or Other Modifications Given to the Project (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Reductions) List the incentives, concessions, waivers, and modifications (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Modifications) Did the project receive a reduction or waiver of parking standards? (Y/N) Notes+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 34 0 52 0 0 0 497 583 43 15 39 16 0 17 206 336 0 10 0 9 0 9 179 207 0 0 0 0 015126010 015126010 40 AIRPORT BLVD P20-0082 5+R 15 29 248 8/10/2022 292 0 0 N Y INC 55 012312440 012312440 304 GRAND AVE P21-0002 2 to 4 R 4 12/15/2022 4 0 0 N Y012314070 012314080 012314090 012314070 012314080 012314090 421 CYPRESS AVE, 209 & 213 LUX AVE BERTOLUCCI'S REDEVELOPMENT P21-0009 5+R 10 5 84 12/15/2022 99 0 0 N Y INC 55 No 012333450 012333450 306 RAILROAD AVE P21-0040 2 to 4 R 4 3/15/2022 4 0 0 N Y 013215250 013215250 201 ROCKWOOD DR P21-0130 SFD O 1 3/1/2022 1 0 0 N Y 012135070 012135070 701 OLIVE AVE DUPLEX P19-0054 B20-1613 2 to 4 R 0 0 2 10/11/2022 2 012024200 012024200 633 LARCH AVE B19-1875 ADU R 0 0 1 8/22/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012336080 012336080 220 VILLAGE WAY B20-0134 ADU R 0 0 1 9/1/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091061190 091061190 2685 TIPPERARY AVE B20-0937 ADU R 0 0 1 3/7/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012166100 012166100 407 LUX AVE B20-1115 ADU R 0 0 1 9/1/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012043290 012043290 110 DRAKE AVE B20-1477 ADU R 0 0 1 3/8/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010321010 010321010 127 ESCANYO DR B20-1830 ADU R 0 0 1 5/4/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 011192020 011192020 406 DELLBROOK AVE B21-0198 ADU R 0 0 1 4/26/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014036030 014036030 320 C ST B21-0323 ADU R 0 0 1 3/3/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012247150 012247150 619 PALM AVE B21-0361 ADU R 0 0 2 10/28/2022 2 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012272040 012272040 563 BADEN AVE B21-0653 ADU R 0 0 1 4/15/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014021350 014021350 779 CIRCLE CT B21-0761 ADU R 0 0 1 6/20/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012185080 012185080 817 MILLER AVE B21-0811 ADU R 0 0 1 5/4/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 011243280 011243280 321 FOREST VIEW DR B21-0813 ADU R 0 0 1 8/1/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013222050 013222050 111 MANOR DR B21-1049 ADU R 0 0 1 6/17/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091072120 091072120 2226 KENRY WAY B21-1217 ADU R 0 0 1 5/5/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013223030 013223030 109 ROCKWOOD DR B21-1038 ADU R 0 1 1/3/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012247160 012247160 615 PALM AVE B21-1306 ADU R 0 1 1/4/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010202020 010202020 777 MCDONELL DR B21-1094 ADU R 0 1 1/4/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012061160 012061160 410 HEMLOCK AVE B21-1249 ADU R 0 1 1/7/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010323100 010323100 213 LOMITAS AVE B21-1334 ADU R 0 1 1/31/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014033170 014033170 245 A ST P20-0071 B21-0735 SFD O 0 1 2/4/2022 1 0 012080330 012080330 104 PECKS LN B21-1906 ADU R 0 1 2/10/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012135070 012135070 701 OLIVE AVE B21-1850 ADU R 0 1 2/14/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012023060 012023060 741 HEMLOCK AVE B21-1050 ADU R 0 1 2/15/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091561020 091561020 3732 CALLAN BLVD B21-1087 ADU R 0 1 2/24/2022 1 1 8/30/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012245060 012245060 628 MILLER AVE B21-0143 SFA O 0 1 1 3/1/2022 2 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 1 new single-family residence and 1 new ADU012164080012164080443 LUX AVE B22-0033 ADU R 0 1 3/3/2022 1 1 9/23/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012201290 012201290 718 COMMERCIAL AVE B21-0577 ADU R 0 1 3/16/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091033060 091033060 2350 ERIN PL B22-0049 ADU R 0 1 4/18/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014021070 014021070 813 COMMERCIAL AVE B20-1678 ADU R 0 1 5/2/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091623380 091623380 18 VISTA CT B21-1054 ADU R 0 1 5/17/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010125230 010125230 53 CALVERT AVE B21-2151 ADU R 0 1 5/20/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012182090 012182090 201 LAUREL AVE B22-0313 SFD O 0 1 6/1/2022 1 0 012134010 012134010 869 OLIVE AVE B21-2190 ADU R 0 1 6/6/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013171240 013171240 113 ROSEWOOD WAY B22-0289 ADU R 0 1 6/8/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012211190 012211190 794 GRAND AVE B21-2245 ADU R 0 1 6/10/2022 1 1 11/28/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012134400 012134400 856 MAPLE AVE B22-0288 ADU R 0 1 6/14/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012211180 012211180 792 GRAND AVE B21-2167 ADU R 0 1 6/17/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012314100 012314100 405 CYPRESS AVE CADENCE PHASE II B20-0804 5+R 0 195 6/23/2022 195 0 010125080 010125080 83 CALVERT AVE B22-0655 ADU R 0 1 6/24/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010354050 010354050 355 ARROYO DR B22-0194 ADU R 0 1 6/28/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012273090 012273090 546 BADEN AVE B21-0923 ADU R 0 1 7/5/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012133070 012133070 833 MAPLE AVE B19-1222 ADU R 0 1 7/8/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012046160 012046160 108 ARDEN AVE B22-0394 ADU R 0 1 7/21/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012323500 012323500 464 RAILROAD AVE B22-0040 ADU R 0 1 7/26/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014133140 014133140 143 MANZANITA AVE B22-1076 ADU R 0 1 8/2/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012201130 012201130 743 BADEN AVE B22-0802 ADU R 0 1 8/3/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010194040 010194040 863 BYRON DR B22-0848 ADU R 0 1 8/10/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010275340 010275340 180 SAN FELIPE AVE B21-2073 ADU R 0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/9/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012086090 012086090 111 GREEN AVE B21-1708 ADU R 0 1 8/30/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091014240 091014240 2545 TARA LN B21-0797 ADU R 0 1 9/6/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091632230 091632230 528 AVALON DR B17-1282 SFD O 0 1 9/9/2022 1 0 012321190 012321190 421 3RD LANE B22-0130 ADU R 0 1 9/21/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010351050 010351050 113 CASEY DR B22-0568 ADU R 0 1 9/23/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012311280 012311280 328 MILLER AVE B22-0900 ADU R 0 1 9/28/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 091023220 091023220 2411 BANTRY LN B22-1590 ADU R 0 1 9/30/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013215160 013215160 219 ROCKWOOD DR B22-1083 ADU R 0 1 10/12/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012133450 012133450 732 SPRUCE AVE B21-0997 ADU R 0 1 10/13/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012141430 012141430 837 LINDEN AVE B22-1069 ADU R 0 1 10/17/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 011201330 011201330 1212 BAYWOOD AVE B22-1328 ADU R 0 1 11/3/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010355030 010355030 371 ARROYO DR B22-1050 ADU R 0 1 11/7/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013031120 013031120 616 LASSEN ST B22-1735 ADU R 0 1 11/14/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012061210 012061210 860 OLIVE AVE B21-2125 ADU R 0 1 11/15/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012282120 012282120 548 4TH LANE B21-2114 SFD O 0 1 11/21/2022 1 0 013075240 013075240 436 ZAMORA DR B22-1535 ADU R 0 1 11/29/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010078040 010078040 106 DUNMAN WAY B20-1942 ADU R 0 1 11/30/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012201440 012201440 766 COMMERCIAL AVE B22-0914 ADU R 0 1 12/15/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012044160 012044160 105 BELMONT AVE B21-1150 ADU R 0 0 1 7/11/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012061140 012061140 406 HEMLOCK AVE B21-1183 ADU R 0 0 1 6/1/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012231250 012231250 606 RAILROAD AVE B13-1795 2 to 4 O 0 0 2 9/15/2022 2 012211120 012211120 757 4TH LANE B19-2180 SFD O 0 0 1 9/29/2022 1 010334270 010334270 110 VERANO DR B18-1701 ADU R 0 0 1 4/15/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 011325080 011325080 988 EL CAMINO REAL B18-1836 5+R 0 0 172 9/8/2022 172 013172040 013172040 347 ROCKWOOD DR B20-0675 ADU R 0 0 1 9/30/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010323060 010323060 251 ALTA MESA DR B20-1749 ADU R 0 0 1 1/20/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014112290 014112290 604 MAYFAIR AVE B20-0727 ADU R 0 0 1 1/31/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010312010 010312010 329 ALTA MESA DR B21-0457 ADU R 0 0 1 11/7/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013034100 013034100 10 CARLSBAD CT B21-0339 ADU R 0 0 1 6/10/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012202120 012202120 201 ACACIA AVE B21-0721 ADU R 0 0 1 4/29/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012314010 012314010 418 LINDEN AVE ROEM B18-1007 5+R 0 19 17 1 1/1/2022 37 0 LIHTC Other 55 Yes Building permit issued in 2021 but not included in 2021 APR012316080 012316090 012316100 012316110 012316080 012316090 012316100 012316110 217-219 GRAND AVE ROEM B18-1005 5+R 0 24 22 1 1/1/2022 47 0 LIHTC Other 55 Yes Building permit issued in 2021 but not included in 2021 APR 014183110 014183110 180 EL CAMINO REAL P21-0126 5+R 9 18 156 9/14/2022 183 0 0 N INC 55 Yes 010162100 010162100 17 CONRAD CT B21-1241 ADU R 0 1 2/24/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 013024170 013024170 211 FAIRWAY B21-1613 ADU R 0 1 1/14/2022 1 1 10/21/2022 1 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 012360160 012360160 4 VIEWMONT TER B21-1495 ADU R 0 1 3/25/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 010083280 010083280 139 ADRIAN AVE B21-1746 ADU R 0 1 4/5/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 014034150 014034150 317 A ST B21-2098 ADU R 0 1 6/10/2022 1 0 UC Berkeley Survey/ABAG Affordability Analysis 0 0 0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: "+" indicates an optional field Housing with Financial Assistance and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsProject Identifier Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Density Bonus 1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10 82 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Note: "+" indicates an optional field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Note: "+" indicates an optional field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Note: "+" indicates an optional field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Note: "+" indicates an optional field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 1 Projection Period 3 4 RHNA Allocation by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years) Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level Deed Restricted - - - 80 - - - - 43 - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - 9 15 - Deed Restricted - 3 1 - - 1 - - 39 - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - 11 16 - Deed Restricted - - - - 2 21 - 11 - - Non-Deed Restricted - 10 13 5 3 4 47 18 17 - Above Moderate 705 - 28 92 283 162 269 3 99 206 - 1,142 - 1,864 - 41 106 368 167 295 50 148 336 - 1,511 790 5 6 7 Extremely low-Income Need 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date Total Units Remaining 283 - - 9 - - - - - - 9 274 210 Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column. Total RHNA Total Units Income Level Very Low Low Extremely Low-Income Units* Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). *Extremely low-income houisng need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten. Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at apr@hcd.ca.gov. 162 147 This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs. 151 Moderate 565 281 313 Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 71 2 Table B Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Permitted Units Issued by Affordability 418 87 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Date of Rezone Rezone Type 2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Date of Rezone Very Low- Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate- Income Rezone Type Parcel Size (Acres) General Plan Designation Zoning Minimum Density Allowed Maximum Density Allowed Realistic Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing Uses Note: "+" indicates an optional field Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 83 Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C 88 Jurisdiction South San Francisco Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) 1 2 3 4 Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation 1-1A - Vacant and Underutilized Land Inventory The City shall periodically update its inventory of vacant and underutilized parcels identified in this Housing Element. The City shall also conduct a periodic review of the composition of the housing stock, the types of dwelling units under construction or expected to be constructed during the following year, and the anticipated mix, based on development proposals approved or under review by the City, of the housing to be developed during the remainder of the period covered by the Housing Element. This analysis will be compared to the City's remaining 2014-2022 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) to determine if any changes in land use policy are warranted. Annual The City adopted the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) in February, 2015 and the DSASP implements new zoning regulations that increase height and density to permit the City to construct appropriate units to meet the ABAG Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2014-2022. Additionally, the City revised and updated the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan to reflect a new Community Civic Campus project. This project required the City to update the list of housing opportunity sites in the Adopted Housing Element. This revision has been submitted for review and approval by the Department of Housing and Community Development. ONGOING Housing Programs Progress Report Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element. Table D Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation 89 1-2A Inclusionary Housing Ordinance The City shall continue to implement the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, in accordance with State law, requiring new for sale residential development over four units to provide a minimum of twenty (20) percent low- and moderate- income housing. 2023 The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance regulations (SSFMC Chapter 20.380)are and continue to be, implemented by the City in accordance with State law. The Planning Commission and City Council voted to amend SSFMC Chapter 20.380 (Inclusionary Housing Regulations)in 2018 to require a 15% contribution to affordable housing for residential rental projects, reduce the requirement from 20% to 15% for residential for sale projects, and adopted an inclusionary impact fee for commercial, office, and hotel development to bolster the City's affordable housing fund. COMPLETE 1-2B - Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Review The City shall periodically review the success of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, SSFMC 20.380, to determine if the objectives of the ordinance are being met. Consideration shall be made to revising provisions of the ordinance to ensure that a range of housing opportunities for all identifiable economic segments of the population, including households of low-and moderate incomes, are provided. 2023 The Planning Commission and City Council voted to amend SSFMC Chapter 20.380 (Inclusionary Housing Regulations) in 2018 to require a 15% contribution to affordable housing for residential rental projects, reduce the requirement from 20% to 15% for residential for sale projects, and adopted an inclusionary impact fee for commercial, office, and hotel development to bolster the City's affordable housing fund. The City Council has provided direction to review the current ordinance, and this is currently underway with consultant assistance. ONGOING 1-3A - Investigate Commercial and Housing Linkage Fee Through participation in the 21 Elements group, the City will investigate the feasibility of commercial and housing linkage fees to support affordable housing. 2015 The Planning Commission and City Council voted to adopt an inclusionary impact fee for commercial, office, and hotel development to bolster the City's affordable housing fund. The City Council has provided direction to review the current ordinance, and this is currently underway with consultant assistance. ONGOING 90 1-4A - Site Acquisition The City shall work with for-profit and nonprofit housing developers to acquire sites that are either vacant or developed with underutilized, blighted, and/or nonconforming uses for the development of affordable housing. As needed, the City will meet with developers to discuss and identify development opportunities and potential funding sources. 2023 With adoption of the Successor Agency's Long Range Property Management Plan by the State Department of Finance in late 2015, the City is positioned to help coordinate the disposition of underutilized properties for development. To date, City staff has met with several development representatives and made six (6) properties in the Downtown area available through a Request for Qualifications. One (1) site is complete with construction for 100% affordable senior housing units. Two (2) sites will be developed with rental housing and up to 100% affordable units due to the inclusion of City funding and affordable housing competitive grant applications. One (1) site is entitled and has completed construction for-sale high density housing with 20% inclusionary housing required. A former firehouse has an entitlement application for a mixed use development that will include 100% affordable for-sale housing and the City. The City completed a Development Agreement and Purchase and Sale Agreement for a 4+ acre property that will be developed with 800 rental housing units and include a 20% affordable housing component. ONGOING 1-4B - Support and Pursue Funding Applications for Affordable Housing Consistent with existing practice, the City shall continue to support funding applications for federal and state funds to promote the development of affordable housing. 2023 The City has applied each year for state funding through the Cap & Trade grant programs for monies to construct complete streets in support of pending affordable housing projects within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. To date, no grant monies have been awarded to the City. Additionally, a 100% affordable rental project for very-low income seniors was issued construction permits in 2017 and was completed in early 2019. This project successfully received affordable housing financing with the City's support of the project application. Two other projects involving City funding (ROEM) have applied for grant and TIF monies to help fund their affordable projects and the City supported those applications. ONGOING 91 1-4C - Consider Waivers or Deferrals of Planning, Building and Impact Fees for Affordable Housing Development Consistent with SSFMC section 20.310.004, the City shall continue to consider the waiver of application and development fees for affordable housing development in order to support the financial viability of affordable housing development. Waiver of such fees will be on a case-by-case basis at the City Council's discretion and will balance the goal of affordable housing production with the need to collect fee revenues to support other City goals. 2023 The City continues to consider permitting or impact fee waivers for affordable housing projects requiring financial assistance. ONGOING 1-4D - Review New Development Requirements for Condominiums, SSFMC 19.36 The City shall review SSFMC 19.36, which requires a minimum of 5 units in order to construct new condominiums, to look at the possibility of reducing unit requirements with the intent of promoting home ownership. 2023 This item is being reviewed as part of the General Plan 2040 update and companion zoning and should be complete by 2023. ONGOING 1-5A - Increased Residential Densities in the Downtown Area Through implementation of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, support increased residential densities and modified development standards for parcels in the downtown area to realize the objectives of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan and General Plan policies. 2023 Adoption of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan has accomplished this program. Expanded increases in densities within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, or within surrounding residential zoning districts near the Downtown has also been analyzed. In 2018, the Planning Commission and City Council adopted a new maximum density for the Downtown Transit Core zoning district, which is located within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, of 180 units per acre with approval of a community benefits plan. COMPLETE 92 1-5B - Support Grand Boulevard Initiative Policies Continue to support the guiding principles of the Grand Boulevard Initiative, which encourages the provision of medium- and high-density housing along El Camino Real in Peninsula communities, in order to create an environment that is supportive of transit, walkable, and mixed-use. The City shall reference this policy direction when considering future land use and zoning changes along El Camino Real, and assess the opportunity for housing development along this key corridor as development proposals arise. 2023 The City continues to support the Grand Boulevard Initiative, in its twelfth year, by providing senior level planning staff at all meetings. The adopted El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan, as well as the zoning update adopted in 2010, implement the guiding principles of the Grand Boulevard Initiative. The City has completed master planning for a new community civic center within the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan that will foster new private housing development in the surrounding plan area. Additionally, the City has entitled 800 units adjacent to SSF BART, ECR and the Centennial Trail as a multi-modal mixed used development that will conform to the Grand Boulevard Initiative policies. Finally, the Engineering Divison is managing a Grand Boulevard Improvement Project for a portion of El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and Hickey Boulevard that will implement the vision of the initiative. COMPLETE 1-6A - Continue to support the development of secondary dwelling units and educate the community about this program Actively promote community education on second units, as permitted in SSFMC 20.350.035, by posting information regarding second units on the City website and providing brochures at the public counter in the Centralized Permit Center. 2023 Brochures are provided at the Permit Center Counter; in addition staff explores second unit options during counter discussions and during building permit plan checks. Additionally, changes at the State level to encourage the production of second units led the City to modify the current zoning regulations to be more permissive. No parking, reduced setbacks, larger second units, and units with multiple bedrooms are now permitted with approval of a Building Division permit only. ONGOING 1-7A - Continue to identify opportunities for residential development through infill and redevelopment of underutilized sites Through completion and implementation of the Downtown Specific Area Plan and ongoing implementation of the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Specific Plan, the BART Transit Village Plan, and the El Camino Real Mixed Use Zoning Districts, the City will maintain an inventory of residential development opportunities on infill and underutilized sites with proper zoning to support both affordable and market rate housing development. 2023 The Department of Economic and Community Development - Economic Development and Housing Division maintains a list of potential development sites. Disposition of Successor Agency properties will be complete by December 2022. ONGOING 93 1-7B - Evaluate Downtown residential lot standards Evaluate the feasibility of reduced lot development standards for Downtown residential zoning districts to encourage the development of new housing and ownership opportunities. 2023 Staff has hired a consultant and conducted an indepth analysis of reduced lot standards within the downtown area to promote subdivision and additional ownership opportunities. A zoning text amendment was adopted in 2019 to reduce required lot dimensions and facilitate new housing and ownership opportunities. COMPLETE 2-1A - Expedite Permit Review To support affordable and market rate housing construction, the City shall work with property owners, project sponsors, and developers to expedite the permit review process; promote housing design and projects that meet the goals, objectives and policies of this Housing Element; provide timely assistance and advice on permits, fees, environmental review requirements, and affordable housing agreements to avoid costly delays in project approval; and interface with community groups and local residents to ensure public support of major new housing developments. 2023 The City continues to provide prompt customer service, and use project planner liaisons for large developments, to facilitate expedited entitlement review and processing. The One Stop Permit center provides accessible services by Planning, Building and Public Works in one building. The One Stop Permit Center hours are from 7am- 5pm. Permit processing is efficient and timely, with accessible staff. The City's Planning Commission meets twice a month and the Design Review Board meets once a month to ensure the timely processing of applications. ONGOING 2-2A - Ensure coordination among departments Early in the development application process, the Planning Division shall work with the applicant and consult with other departments and divisions to ensure that necessary infrastructure is planned or is in place to support the proposed project. 2023 The Community Development Department relies on a Technical Advisory Group and pre-submittal meetings with potential applicants to ensure a smooth application process. Representatives from Public Works, Fire Safety, Police, Water Quality and Building ensure that adequate infrastructure is planned or available to support the proposed project. Additionally, applicants of large development projects are invited to attend the Technical Advisory Group meetings to present their pre-development projects and discuss any questions or concerns with City staff. ONGOING 94 2-3A - Support regional funding programs The City shall continue to participate with other government agencies to support regional funding programs, such as participating with San Mateo County in its Housing Revenue Bond and Mortgage Credit Certificate programs. 2023 The City continues to participate in the 21 Elements TAC meetings. The City also collaborates with HEART (Housing Endowment and Regional Trust) of San Mateo County as well as the Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County. The Housing Rehab Bond and Mortgage Credit Certificate Programs were not utilized for any City financed construction projects in 2022. ONGOING 2-4A - Continue to implement adopted design guidelines Implementation of design guidelines applies to rehabilitation and renovation of existing structures as well as to new construction. 2023 The Residential Design Guide was adopted by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 2471. In addition, the adopted El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Plan and Downtown Station Area Specific Plan includes Design Standards and Guidelines. All new projects are evaluated for consistency with applicable design guidelines. City staff will adopt a form based code for new Residential Design Guidelines consistent with objective standards as part of the General Plan 2040 process currently underway. ONGOING 2-5A - Disseminate Information on Affordable Housing Programs To widen the availability of information to interested residents, the City will continue to update its website and other promotional/informational materials to include information on affordable housing, housing programs, and inclusionary units. 2023 The Housing Division maintains online resources for general affordable housing programs and for specific inclusionary units related to new development. Outreach related to the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly ramped up in 2020 and continued through 2022, as well. ONGOING 3-1A - Minor Home Repair The City will provide funds to non-profit organizations providing free minor home repairs to assist extremely low- to low-income homeowners to bring houses into a good state of repair and maintain them as viable units in the local housing stock. 2023 Minor Home Repair Programs Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (CID): The City used CDBG funds to support CID Housing Accessibility Modification (HAM) Program which provides accessibility modifications. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (RTP): The City used CDBG funds to support two RTP programs, National Rebuilding Day and Safe at Home. El Concilio: The City used CDBG funds to support El Concilio's Peninsula Minor Home Repair Program. ONGOING 95 3-1B - Funding Prioritization The City shall continue to give housing rehabilitation efforts high priority in the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Funds shall be targeted towards older housing stock and to families earning less than 80 percent of AMI. 2023 Minor Home Repair Programs Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (CID): The City used $10,0000 in CDBG funds to support CID Housing Accessibility Modification (HAM) Program which provides accessibility modifications. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (RTP): The City used $70,500 in CDBG funds to support two RTP programs, National Rebuilding Day and Safe at Home. El Concilio: The City used$27,500 in CDBG funds to support El Concilio's Peninsula Minor Home Repair Program. ONGOING 3-1C - Low Interest Loans for Housing Rehabilitation The City shall provide low-interest loans for rehabilitation of single-family and multi-family housing by supporting the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program with continued CDBG funding. 2023 Minor Home Repair Programs Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities (CID): The City used CDBG funds to support CID Housing Accessibility Modification (HAM) Program which provides accessibility modifications. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (RTP): The City used CDBG funds to support two RTP programs, National Rebuilding Day and Safe at Home. El Concilio: The City used CDBG funds to support El Concilio's Peninsula Minor Home Repair Program. The City issued one loan for the rehabilitation of a single family home for a very- low-income family using CDBG funds. ONGOING 3-1D - Financial Assistance for SROs The City shall provide financial assistance, when feasible, for physical improvements to existing boarding rooms and Single Room Occupancies in the Downtown area. 2023 The City did not provide any financial assistance to Single Room Occupancies in the Downtown area in 2022. ONGOING 3-2A - Enforce Housing, Building and Safety Codes The City shall continue to aggressively enforce uniform housing, building, and safety codes as well as eliminate incompatible uses or blighting influences from residential neighborhoods through targeted code enforcement and other available regulatory measures. 2023 The City operates a Code Enforcement Division through the Public Works Department. For 2022, there were up to three enforcement officers on staff that enforce housing, building and safety codes. Additionally, Building Division staff enforces these codes when they are out on inspections. Incompatible uses are addressed in zoning code section 20.320. ONGOING 96 3-3A - Capital Improvement Program for Older Neighborhoods The City shall maintain its capital improvement program to upgrade infrastructure in older neighborhoods such as Village Way, Willow Gardens, Town of Baden, Downtown (or Old Town), Irish Town, and Peck's Lots. 2023 The Engineering Division continues to manage and administer the Capital Improvement Program budget to upgrade essential infrastructure throughout the City. ONGOING 3-4A - Support SSF Public Housing Authority (PHA) The City shall support the South San Francisco PHA in its continued operation and rental of 80 units of public housing. 2023 The SSF PHA continues to receive HUD funding support and operates independently of the City; however, the City is coordinating to pursue federal funding sources to improve the public housing. ONGOING 3-4B - Examine Displacement of Affordable Housing and Lower-Income Households The City shall coordinate with other jurisdictions in San Mateo County, under the umbrella of work to be undertaken by 21 Elements, to quantify, develop and evaluate potential strategies to address displacement of lower income residents. The City will use this analysis, in addition to other analysis, to develop potential measures and programs and the City will implement those programs, as it considers and deems appropriate, to address the risk of displacement of existing lower income residents. Displacement might be direct, caused by the redevelopment of sites with existing residential properties, or indirect, caused by increased market rents as an area becomes more desirable. The City shall monitor any such implemented programs annually for effectiveness and make adjustments as necessary. 2015 The City continues to participate in the 21 Elements Technical Advisory Group, which analyzed displacement concerns for San Mateo County in 2018 as part of their work plan. The draft report was submitted to the City in February, 2018 and has been reviewed for recommendations and implementation measures. Staff conducted one study session with City Council in 2018, a second in 2019 to discuss tenant protections for SSF residents, and adopted interim measures to protect tenants during the window between adoption of State Legistlation for Rental Protection and the effective date. COMPLETE 97 3-5A - Condominium Conversion Limitations The City shall continue to enforce limits on the conversion of apartment units to condominiums. As specified in Chapter 19.80 of the Municipal Code, condominium conversions are allowed only if they meet the following general criteria: a. A multiple-family vacancy rate of at least five percent exists; b. The conversion has an overall positive effect on the City's available housing stock; c. Adequate provisions are made for maintaining and managing the resulting condominium projects; d. The project meets all building, fire, zoning, and other applicable codes in force at the time of conversion; e. The conversion is consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan; and f. The conversion creates at least five (5) condominium units. 2023 No requests or preliminary requests for consideration of a Condominium Conversion of apartment units were submitted to the City in 2022. ONGOING 3-6A - Monitor At-Risk Units The City shall monitor its supply of subsidized affordable housing to know of possible conversions to market rate, including taking the following actions: a. Publicize existing State and federal notice requirements to nonprofit developers and property owners of at- risk housing. b. Respond to any federal and/or State notices including Notice of Intent to Pre- Pay, owner Plans of Action, or Opt-Out Notices filed on local projects. 2023 No subsidized units monitored by the City of SSF were at-risk of conversion to market rate in 2022. ONGOING 98 3-6B - Assist Tenants The City shall assist tenants displaced by the conversion of at risk units by providing information about tenants' rights, providing referrals to relevant social service providers, endeavoring to establish a funding source to assist nonprofit organizations that support tenants, and facilitating other support as appropriate. 2023 In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created many risks for tenants that continued into 2022. The City maintains online resources and brochures in the Economic and Community Development Department that detail information about tenants' rights, social service providers, and other support institutions. Additionally, programs were created to offset rent challenges of tenants and rent loss of property owners with success. ONGOING 4-1A - Review Projects for Major Environmental Hazards during the Environmental Review Process The City shall review residential projects for major environmental hazards during the environmental review process. The City shall not approve the projects unless the hazards are adequately mitigated. 2023 All projects reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and/or City Council have been reviewed for consistency with the California Environmental Quality Act. ONGOING 4-2A - Administer Minimum Building Security Standards The City shall continue to administer Chapter 15.48, Minimum Building Security Standards, of the Municipal Code by continuing to route all new development applications and additions to both the Police and Fire Deparments to ensure compliance with the code and to ensure that security measures are considered during the design process. 2023 The Economic and Community Development Department's project review, entitlement, and building permit processes ensure that Chapter 15.48 is administered and applied to all new development applications and additions. ONGOING 4-3A - Ensure that applications for new residential land uses proposed within the 65 to 69 CNEL aircraft noise contour include an acoustical study The City shall require that the acoustical study be prepared by a professional acoustic engineer and specify the appropriate noise mitigation features to be included in the design and construction of the new units, to achieve an interior noise level of not more than 45 dB, based on measured aircraft noise events at the land use location. 2023 All new applications for residential development are reviewed for consistency with the SFO Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) and adopted Municipal Code regulations. New residential projects within the 70+ dB CNEL areas are not currently permitted without an override process by the local agency, and new residential projects within the 65 to 69 dB CNEL noise contours require acoustic studies. ONGOING 99 5-1A - Density Bonus for Senior Housing The City shall include density bonus incentives specifically targeted for senior housing projects and permit reduced parking standards. 2023 No senior housing projects were processed in 2022. ONGOING 5-1B - Reduced Parking Requirement for Board and Care Facilities Encourage development of residential board and care facilities for seniors by continuing to allow reduced parking requirements for these types of facilities. 2023 The City's Municipal Code SSFMC 20.330.004 reduces parking requirements for residential care facilities as part of the 2010 Zoning Ordinance Update. The requirement is: 1 space for every 7 residents plus 1 space for each live-in caregiver. Facilities serving more than 15 residents shall also provide 1 space for each caregiver, employee, and doctor on-site at any one time. ONGOING 5-2A - Ensure Consistency with State Accessibility Laws The City shall review development plans to ensure consistency with state handicap and accessibility laws and require modifications for accessibility as needed. 2023 During the review of all new development projects and applications for modifications to existing buildings, the Building Division staff plan checks projects to ensure that all State Accessibly Laws are met in accordance with California Building Code Section 1134B. ONGOING 5-2B - Promote Disabled Housing Resources and Programs The City shall ensure that its website and handout materials regarding housing resources, requirements, and services for the disabled are updated regularly and made available to the public. 2023 The City maintains online resources and materials regarding housing and services for the disabled and has staff in the Economic and Community Development Department who are trained to assist with housing issues. ONGOING 5-3A - Accessibility Modification Programs The City shall continue to support programs that provide modifications that make housing units accessible to the disabled. 2023 The City provides annual grant funding to the Center of Independent of Individual with Disabilities (CID) who has a Housing Accessibly Modification (HAM) Program that provides financial assistance to people that need to made modifications to their home to allow for disabled access. Additionally, the zoning ordinance includes SSFMC section 20.510, Waivers and Modifications, that provides provisions for reasonable accommodations to ensure equal access to housing by allowing the Chief Planner authority to grant relief from zoning requirements. ONGOING 5-4A - Reasonable Accommodations The City shall create a public information brochure on reasonable accommodation for disabled persons and provide that information on the City's website. 2023 The City provides information consistent with the program. Additionally, the zoning ordinance includes SSFMC section 20.510, Waivers and Modifications, that provides provisions for reasonable accommodations to ensure equal access to housing by allowing the Chief Planner authority to grant relief from zoning requirements. ONGOING 100 5-4B - Resources for the developmentally disabled The City shall support the Golden Gate Regional Center in its mission to serve those with developmental disabilities, disseminate information about the Center and its services, and make referrals as appropriate. 2023 The City's Zoning regulations permit Adult Day Care uses in many areas of the City by-right. These uses are typically funded in some part by the Golden Gate Regional Center to serve developmentally disabled infants, children, youth and adults. ONGOING 5-5A - Support a variety of housing unit designs, including larger housing units that can accommodate large families The City shall seek to broaden the diversity of its housing stock that is affordable to extremely low, very low, and low income households to include more units that are suitable to large families. Currently, much of the City's affordable housing consists of single- room occupancy units and one- and two- bedroom units. The City shall work with housing developers during the entitlement process and encourage them to provide a unit mix with at least 10 percent of units having three or more bedrooms. 2023 At pre-application meetings staff discusses providing a range of housing sizes with developers during the planning stages of residential development projects prior to the submittal of a formal application. In the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, family sized housing is recognized as a community benefit eligible for a density bonus. ONGOING 5-6A - Support Continuum of Care Planning The City shall continue to be an active participant in the Continuum of Care planning process and support its efforts to address the needs of South San Francisco residents in need of emergency shelter or temporary housing. 2023 The City continues to provide referrals to families and individuals for social services including case management and referrals for housing and homeless prevention, as appropriate. ONGOING 5-6B - Support non-profits that offer housing solutions and services for homeless The City shall continue to support non- profit organizations that offer solutions to solving homelessness and/or provide housing related services for the homeless or at-risk homeless. 2023 There is a County run homeless shelter located in the City on North Access Road. The former Redevelopment Agency regularly provided funding to the County for the operation of the shelter. As part of the 2015-2023 Housing Element update, the City conducted a capacity analysis for new emergency shelter construction within approved zoning districts. ONGOING 5-6C - Support Ongoing Operation of 90-Bed Emergency Shelter in South San Francisco The City shall continue to support the operation of a 90-bed year round homeless shelter within the city limits. 2023 Funding for homeless services and housing was provided to Samaritan House and CORA (Communities Overcoming Relationship Abuse). ONGOING 101 5-6D - Social Services for Housing and Homeless Prevention The City shall continue to provide referrals to organizations helping families with social services for housing and homeless prevention. 2023 The City's Housing Division maintains online and handout resources for residents with housing challenges. Consistent with COVID-19 pandemic outreach, this effort was ramped up in 2020 and continued through 2022 to prevent homelessness. ONGOING 5-7A - Support and Promote Home Sharing The City shall support the efforts and services of the HIP Home Sharing Program to provide an alternative housing solution for extremely low and very low income individuals and families; female-headed households; those at risk of homelessness; and others in need. The Economic Development and Housing Division will provide information about the HIP program, provide referrals, and support residents of South San Francisco who are interested in participating. 2023 The City's Housing Division maintains online and handout resources for residents with housing challenges. ONGOING 5-8A - Provide referrals to Veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness The City shall provide referrals to Veterans and their immediate families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Resources for referrals include the Veteran's Administration (VA) National Call Center of Homeless Veterans at 1-877-4AID-VET and to the HUD-VASH program that is a joint effort between the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) Program to move Veterans and their families out of homelessness and into permanent housing through a voucher program that allows homeless Veterans to rent privately owned housing. 2023 Many of these resources are shared with applicable residents through the funded Samaritan House and CORA shelter systems. The City provides an annual grant to a fair housing service provider using its HOME Administrative funds. Project Sentinel, provides comprehensive fair housing services including complaint investigation, community outreach and education to San Mateo County residents. ONGOING 102 5-9A - Amend the Zoning Code to comply with Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5 regarding employee housing for six or fewer employees The City shall amend its Zoning Ordinance to allow employee housing in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5, to permit and encourage the development and use of sufficient numbers and types of employee housing facilities as are commensurate with local needs. 2016 This item has been included in a recent zoning text amendment update reviewed by the Planning Commission and adopted by the City Council. COMPLETE 6-1A - Support Equal Housing Opportunity Laws The City shall require that all recipients of locally-administered housing assistance funds and other means of support from the City acknowledge their understanding of fair housing law and affirm their commitment to the law. The City shall provide materials to help with the understanding of and compliance with fair housing law. 2023 The City provides an annual grant to a fair housing service provider using its HOME Administrative funds. Project Sentinel, provides comprehensive fair housing services including complaint investigation, community outreach and education to San Mateo County residents. ONGOING 6-1B - Regional Cooperation The City shall participate with other jurisdictions in San Mateo County to periodically update the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing in San Mateo County, a report that helps jurisdictions identify impediments to fair housing and develop solutions. 2023 The City is a member of the 21 Elements Technical Advisory Committee, which is working to address housing shortage and displacement concerns. ONGOING 103 6-2A - Legal Counsel and Advocacy Assistance The City shall support nonprofits providing legal counseling and advocacy assistance concerning fair housing laws, rights, and remedies to those who believe they have been discriminated against. Persons requesting informatio or assistance related to housing discrimination are referred to one or more fair housing groups for legal services. Consistent with exisitng practice, brochures providing information on fair housing and tenants' rights are available at City Hall, public libraries and on the City's website. The brochures are also available at nonprofit organizations serving low-income residents. The brochures are available in English and Spanish. As funding allows, the City shall provide funding assistance to organizations that provide fair housing, tenant/landlord, and habitability counseling and other general housing assistance. 2023 The City provides an annual grant to a fair housing service provider using its HOME Administrative funds. Project Sentinel, provides comprehensive fair housing services including complaint investigation, community outreach and education to San Mateo County residents. ONGOING 7-1A - Assist with energy/weatherization and water conserving modifications/features in existing residential rehabilitation projects The City will continue to provide funds to non-profit organizations that provide energy efficiency upgrades and/or weatherization improvements for very low- and low-income households. 2023 Through the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program and CDBG subrecipient grants, the City encourages weatherization and energy efficiency upgrades. The City continues to provide funding and technical assistance to energy efficiency upgrade programs, including the Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) program. ONGOING 104 7-2A - Continue to provide information on energy efficient standards for residential buildings The City shall promote the use of passive and active solar systems in new and existing residential buildings to ensure that State residential energy conservation building standards are met. The City's Climate Action Plan (CAP), adopted in February 2014, also includes measures to promote energy efficiency, which are actively implemented. 2023 Building Division staff implements and enforces the California Green Building Code for all new residential and commercial projects. During residential rehabilitation projects, like Rebuilding Together, replacement of appliances/utilities includes energy and water conserving models. The City promotes the use of solar panels with reduced permitting fees and streamlined review and inspections. In addition, the City Council adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in February 2014, that sets forth reduction measures that apply to residential development. Measure 3-5 in the CAP promotes energy information and sharing, and educating the community about energy-efficiency behaviors and construction. ONGOING 7-3A - Title 24 The City shall continue to enforce State requirements, including Title 24 requirements, for energy conservation in residential development and encourage residential developers to consider employing additional energy conservation measures with respect to the following: 1. Street and driveway design 2. Lot pattern and configuration 3. Siting of builings 4. Landscaping 5. Solar access 2023 The CAP includes measures that encourage the integration of higher-density development and mixed-use development near transit facilities and community faculties, and to reduce the dependence on autos through smart parking practices. In addition, the City continues to implement Title 24 requirements through the Building Division. ONGOING 105 7-3B - Promote Green Building Features The City will utilize the following tools to promote green building and energy conserving features in new and existing residential construction. In 2009, the City completed the Green X- Ray House, transforming an existing single-family home into an energy efficient model home. The City will use the Green X-Ray House as a public outreach tool to disseminate information regarding energy-saving opportunities, offering regular tours to homeowners and homebuilders as well as for promotional events. This home features an array of products including solar panels, radiant floor heating and recycled glass tiles. Staff has adopted the a Green Building Ordinance (2014). 2023 Building Division staff implements and enforces the California Green Building Code for all new residential and commercial projects. During residential rehabilitation projects, like Rebuilding Together, replacement of appliances/utilities includes energy and water conserving models. The Green X- Ray house is no longer in operation. ONGOING 106 General Comments 107 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Description of Commercial Development Bonus Commercial Development Bonus Date Approved 3 4 APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Income Description of Commercial Development Bonus Commercial Development Bonus Date Approved Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Units Constructed as Part of Agreement Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E Note: "+" indicates an optional field Project Identifier 1 2 Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202) Annual Progress Report January 2020 108 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code Section 65583.1+. For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist here: Extremely Low- Income+Very Low-Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+ Extremely Low- Income+ Very Low- Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+ https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf Rehabilitation Activity Preservation of Units At-Risk Acquisition of Units Mobilehome Park Preservation Total Units by Income Table F Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F. Activity Type Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+ Listed for Informational Purposes Only Units that Count Towards RHNA + Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields. Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020 109 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Notes 2 3 6 Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (2 to 4,5+) Tenure R=Renter Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Total Moderate Income Units Converted from Above Moderate Date Converted Notes Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Table F2 Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuant to Government Code section 65400.2 For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the planning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to deed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants and restrictions for the unit. Before adding information to this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements described in Government Code 65400.2(b). 5 Project Identifier Unit Types 1 4 Affordability by Household Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Above Moderate RHNA 110 Jurisdiction South San Francisco Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation 2 3 4 APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Realistic Capacity Identified in the Housing Element Entity to whom the site transferred Intended Use for Site 1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Note: "+" indicates an optional field Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Table G Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year. 111 Jurisdiction South San Francisco Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Designation Size Notes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of Units Surplus Designation Parcel Size (in acres)Notes NOTE: This table is meant to contain an invenory of ALL surplus/excess lands the reporting jurisdiction owns Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Parcel Identifier ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation Table H Locally Owned Surplus Sites For San Mateo County jurisdictions, please format the APN's as follows:999-999-999 112 113 114 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: + indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Project Type Date 2 3 APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+Activity Date Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Income Table I Units Constructed Pursuant to Government Code 65852.21 and Applications for Lot Splits Pursuant to Government Code 66411.7 (SB9) NOTE: SB 9 PROJECTS ONLY. This table only needs to be completed if there were lot splits applied for pursuant to Government Code 66411.7 OR units constructed pursuant to 65852.21. Units entitled/permitted/constructed must also be reported in Table A2. Applications for these units must be reported in Table A. Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Project Identifier Unit Constructed 1 4 Annual Progress Report January 2020 115 Jurisdiction South San Francisco ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Project Type Date 2 3 APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SH - Student Housing)Date Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Note Cells in g Table J Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915 Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4 NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS ONLY. This table only needs to be completed if there were student housing projects WITH a density bonus approved pursuant to Government Code65915(b)(1)(F) Annual Progress Report January 2020 116 Jurisdiction South San Francisco Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Current Year Deed Restricted 43 Non-Deed Restricted 15 Deed Restricted 39 Non-Deed Restricted 16 Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 17 206 336 Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed SFA 0 2 0 SFD 1 4 1 2 to 4 8 0 4 5+574 279 172 ADU 0 51 30 MH 0 0 0 Total 583 336 207 5 734 187 0 0 0 0 0 Income Rental Ownership Total Very Low 0 0 0 Low 0 0 0 Moderate 0 0 0 Above Moderate 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Total Units Constructed with Streamlining Total Housing Applications Submitted: Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received: Total Housing Units Approved: Total Housing Units Disapproved: Total Units Housing Applications Summary Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits Number of Streamlining Applications Approved Total Developments Approved with Streamlining 117 Jurisdiction South San Francisco Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26. Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested Other Funding Notes Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Year Deed Restricted 34 Non-Deed Restricted 0 Deed Restricted 52 Non-Deed Restricted 0 Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 0 497 583 Current Year Deed Restricted 43 Non-Deed Restricted 15 Deed Restricted 39 Non-Deed Restricted 16 Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 17 206 336 Current Year Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 10 Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 9 Deed Restricted 0 Non-Deed Restricted 9 179 207 Moderate Above Moderate Total Units Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Units Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level Very Low Low Total Units Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting (CCR Title 25 §6202) Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable. -$ Task Status 118 1 Analysis of South San Francisco General Plan (GP) with Adopted Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Guidelines – 2017 Version OPR Guideline Requirement (to the extent that it is relevant)1 Reference or Comment Degree of Compliance Contains all 7 mandatory elements GP contains Land Use, Transportation (Circulation), Housing, Open Space and Conservation, Noise, and Health and Safety Elements. Additional local elements include: Planning Sub-Areas; Parks, Public Facilities and Services; and Economic Development. Full Plan is integrated and internally consistent An independent review of the South San Francisco 1999 General Plan and the 2015-2023 Housing Element found that the plan is integrated and internally consistent. Full Land Use Element Contains a Land Use Diagram in sufficient detail to describe land use proposals GP contains a Land Use Diagram with sufficient detail to describe land use proposals, pg. 2-6. Full Shows distribution of housing, business and industry GP Land Use Diagram shows areas for residential (housing), commercial, office, industrial, public, parks and recreation, open spaces, mixed uses, transportation center, school uses, and several sub-categories of uses, pg. 2-6. Full Distribution of open space including agriculture GP Land Use Diagram shows proposed open space uses. There are no agricultural lands in South San Francisco, pg. 2-6. Full Distribution of natural resources Natural Resources are not addressed in the Land Use Element. However, they are addressed in the Open Space and Conservation Element. Partial – Recommend inclusion in future update Distribution of recreation facilities and opportunities GP Land Use Diagram, pg. 2-6, the Land Use Element text, pg. 2- 21 thru 2-25, and the Parks, Public Facilities and Services Element, pg. 5-1 thru 5-21 describe the distribution of recreation facilities and opportunities. Full Location of educational facilities GP Land Use Diagram, pg. 2-6, the Land Use Element text, pg. 2- 21 thru 2-24, and the Parks, Public Facilities and Services Element text pg. 5-1, -23, -25 & -26 describe the location of educational facilities. Full Location of public buildings and grounds GP Land Use Diagram, pg. 2-6, the Land Use Element text, pg. 2-5, -16, -19 thru -23, -25, -33 & -46, and throughout the Parks, Public Facilities and Services Element text, describe the location of public buildings and grounds. Full 1 Language from the OPR Guidelines. 119 2 Location of solid and liquid waste facilities The Land Use Element text does not describe the location of solid and liquid waste facilities. Non-compliance Identification of areas subject to flooding The Land Use Element text, pg. 2-25 and the Health and Safety Element text, pg. 8-10 & -11 and map on pg. 8-13 identifies areas subject to flooding. Partial – Recommend Map inclusion in updated Land Use Elem. Identification of Timber Preserve Zone lands There are no Timber Preserve Zone lands in South San Francisco. N/A Military land use compatibility There are no military land uses in or adjacent to South San Francisco. N/A – Recommend topic be addressed in future update Contains standards for population intensity and building intensity The Land Use Element text and tables, pg. 2-7, -9 and -13 thru -25 contains standards for population intensity and building intensity. Full Transportation (Circulation) Element Contains definitions and descriptions of: Major thoroughfares The Transportation Element maps, pg. 4-7 & 4-15 and the Circulation Element text, pg. 4-5, 4-10 thru -12, define and describe major thoroughfares; freeways, arterials, collectors, local streets and street standards. Full Transportation routes The Transportation Element maps and text, pg. 4-1, -4, -19, -22, -25, -27, -28, -29, -36, -37, & -39 defines and describes transportation routes. Full Terminals The Transportation Element maps pg. 4-26, -36, & -37 and text, pg. 4-14, -40 thru -42, defines and describes the rail, ferry and airport terminals. Full Military airports and ports There are no military airports or ports in South San Francisco. N/A Plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network The Transportation Element maps pg. 4-26, -36, & -37, text and policies, pg. 4-1, -2, -14, -21, -23, -24, -27 describe a balanced, multimodal transportation network including complete streets, vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, bus and rail facilities. Full Other local public utilities and facilities including railroads, airports and parking. The Transportation Element text, defines and describes transit and rail traffic, pg. 4-1, -4, & -40; airports, pg. 4-1 & -40; and parking, pg. 4-5, -21, -24, -25, -29, -32, -35, & -38. Full Housing Element (CA HCD found “In Compliance” (4/12/2018) Review of previous element The Housing Element includes discussions of public participation, pg. 5, review of past performance, progress in implementation, Full 120 3 effectiveness, and appropriateness of goals, objectives and policies, pg. 5-10 and Appendix A. Housing needs assessment The Housing Element includes a housing needs assessment as described in the Guidelines, pg. 11-34. Full Inventory and analysis of adequate sites The Housing Element includes an inventory and analysis of adequate sites as described in the Guidelines, pg. 77-93. Full Analysis of potential governmental and non- governmental constraints The Housing Element includes analyses of potential governmental and non-governmental constraints as described in the Guidelines, pg. 47-75. Full Housing policies and programs The Housing Element includes goals, policies and programs as described in the Guidelines, pg. 96-118. Full Quantified objectives The Housing Element includes quantified objectives as described in the Guidelines, pg. 119. Full Integrate community health, climate change, and other considerations affecting and affected by housing The Housing Element includes references to community health, pg. 9, 15, 18, 30, 43, &127; and climate action plan and change, pg. 10, 76, 117, &129. Full Open Space and Conservation Element The Conservation Element must address the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources including: The Open Space and Conservation Element includes discussion and policies relating to habitat and biological resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and historic and cultural resources conservation. Each of the required topics is discussed below. Water and its hydraulic force Discussion and polices related to surface and groundwater quality, pg. 7-1, -10, -11, & -12; however, it does not address the hydraulic force of water. Partial Forests There are no forests in South San Francisco N/A Soils The topic of soil conservation is not addressed in the Element. Non-compliance Rivers and other waters The topic of Colma Creek, the only major waterway in South San Francisco is addressed, pg. 7-2, -4, -5, -6, -10, & -11. Full Harbors and fisheries The topics of harbors and fisheries is not addressed in the Element. Non-compliance Wildlife The topic of wildlife and biological resources is addressed, pg. 7-1 thru 7-8 & 7-10. Full Minerals and other natural resources The topic of minerals is not addressed in the Element.2 Non-compliance The Open Space Element must address: Open space for the preservation of natural resources The Open Space and Conservation Element includes a discussion and maps of habitat conservation areas, pg. 7-3 thru 7-9. Full 2 USGS identifies a silver, zinc, lead resource in close proximity to the City. 121 4 Open space for the managed production of resources The Open Space and Conservation Element does not include a discussion of managed production of resources. Non-compliance Open space for outdoor recreation The Parks, Public Facilities, and Services Element includes a discussion and maps of outdoor recreation, pg. 5-2 thru 5-22. Partial - Recommend inclusion in updated Open Space and Conservation Element Open space for public health and safety The Open Space and Conservation Element does not include a discussion of public health and safety. While health and safety are discussed in the Health and Safety Element, those topics are not discussed in the context of open space. Non-compliance Open space for military support There are no military installations in or adjacent to South San Francisco. N/A – Recommend topic be addressed in future update Open space for tribal resources The Open Space and Conservation Element does not include a discussion tribal resources. Non-compliance The Open Space Element should contain an open space action program The Open Space and Conservation Element does not include an open space action program. Non-compliance Noise Element Issues to be addressed include: Major noise sources, both mobile and stationary; including roadway, rail, air, commercial and industrial sources The Noise Element text and maps, pg. 9-2 thru 9-11 describes existing and projected major community noise sources, including roadway, rail, air, and industrial sources. Full Existing and projected levels of noise and noise contours for major noise sources The Noise Element describes existing noise levels but does not include a map of existing noise contours for roadway, rail and industrial sources. An existing and projected noise contour map is included for air sources, pg. 9-5 and a projected noise contour map is included for roadway and rail sources, pgl 9-9. Partial Existing and projected land uses and locational relationship to existing and projected noise sources The Noise Element text, pg. 9-3 thru 9-7 describes the existing and projected land uses and locational relationship to existing and projected noise sources Full Existing and proposed sensitive receptors, including hospitals, convalescent homes, schools, churches and sensitive wildlife habitat The Noise Element, pg. 9-1, -2, -7, -12, -13, & -15 describes policies for sensitive receptors, including hospitals, convalescent homes, schools, churches and sensitive wildlife habitat Full Mitigation measures The Noise Element text, pg. 9-8, 9-11 thru 9-13 describes noise mitigation measures. Full 122 5 Implementation measures The Noise Element text, pg. 9-11 thru 9-13 & 9-15 describes implementing policies and possible solutions that address existing and foreseeable noise problems. Full Health and Safety Element Issues to be addressed include: Seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, The Health and Safety Element text addresses seismically induced ground (surface) rupture, ground shaking, and ground failure pg. 8- 4 thru 8-6. Full Tsunami, seiche, and dam failure The Health and Safety Element text addresses seismically induced tsunami, and water waves (seiche), pg. 8-5 thru 8-7. There are no dams in or near South San Francisco, therefore the topic of dam failure is not addressed. Full Slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides The Health and Safety Element text addresses slope instability leading to landslides pg. 8-2, 8-4 thru 8-6. The element does not address mudslides. Partial Subsidence, liquefaction, and other seismic hazards identified on seismic hazard maps The Health and Safety Element text addresses liquefaction, pg. 8-2, 8-4 thru 8-6. The element does not address subsidence nor does it contain seismic hazard maps. Partial Flooding The Health and Safety Element text addresses flooding, pg. 8-10 thru 8-12 including a map on pg. 8-13. Full Wildland and urban fires The Health and Safety Element text addresses wildland and urban fires, pg. 8-20 thru 8-23. Full Evacuation routes The Health and Safety Element does not address evacuation routes. Non-compliance Peak load water supply requirements The Health and Safety Element does not address peak load water supply requirements, although the subject of emergency water supply is addressed in general. Non-compliance Climate change The Health and Safety Element does not address climate change although that topic is discussed in the Housing Element Non-compliance Minimum road widths and turnouts The Health and Safety Element does not address minimum road widths. Non-compliance Clearances around structures The Health and Safety Element text addresses clearances around structures, including defensible spaces and buffers between vegetation and structures, pg. 8-20 and 8-22. Full 123 City Council Hearing March 22, 2023 1124 2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 New Units Issued BP Units Issued CoO New Units Approved by Planning (Entitlements) 5 1 104 8 279 172 574 52 30 0 Single Family Small Multi-Family (2-4 units) Large Multi-Family (5+ units)ADUs 125 3 As of December 31, 2022 Remaining RHNA Units 81% (1,511 Units) 19% (353 Units) 126 4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Very Low (<50% AMI) Low (50-80% AMI) Moderate (80-120% AMI) Above Moderate (>120% AMI) 147 71 151 1142 565 281 313 705 Units Issued BP to Date RHNA Allocation 127 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-182 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:8. Motion to receive and file the City’s Housing Successor Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve a motion to receive and file the Housing Successor Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021-22. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City of South San Francisco (“City”)is the Housing Successor Agency (“Housing Successor”)to the former South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”),which was dissolved on February 1,2012. Each housing successor agency is required to prepare an annual report on how it is meeting requirements imposed by Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) Section 34176.1. The report is due to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”)by April 1st each year and must be posted on the City’s website.The report for Fiscal Year 2021-22 will be submitted to HCD by April 1, 2023, and is being presented to the City Council to receive and file. Review and Analysis The Housing Successor is meeting all compliance requirements of HSC Section 34176.1 for Fiscal Year 2021- 22. Progress on major requirements is summarized below. Housing Asset Fund Activity As of June 30,2022,the Housing Asset Fund balance was approximately $4.2 million ($2.5 million of which was cash).The Housing Asset Fund received $148,275 in revenues.The largest revenue source was rents from Housing Successor affordable rental properties ($131,272).Other revenue sources included interest income and loan repayments. The Housing Successor spent $344,378 in Housing Asset Funds in Fiscal Year 2021-22.The expenditures consisted of administrative items ($238,195)and rapid rehousing expenses ($106,183)in the form of Emergency Rental Assistance.There were no expenditures for housing development projects during the fiscal year. Real Property Assets and Loans Receivable As the Housing Successor, the City owns four properties with a statutory value of $6.8 million: ·339-341 Commercial contains two duplexes operated as affordable housing.The properties were City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™128 File #:23-182 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:8. ·339-341 Commercial contains two duplexes operated as affordable housing.The properties were originally purchased by the former Agency to mitigate a blighted property and create affordable housing. ·714-718 Linden contains a triplex operated as affordable housing.The former Agency purchased the property in 2005 to preserve the affordability of the units after the original affordability covenants expired. ·630 Baden contains the Magnolia Senior Apartments,a 125-unit affordable multifamily development. The Housing Successor owns 95,309-square feet of land under the building. ·636 El Camino contains an affordable multifamily housing complex developed by MidPen Housing. The Housing Successor owns 87,121-square feet or land under the building. All properties transferred from the former Agency to the Housing Successor were required to be developed for affordable housing or sold by August 31,2017.The City meets this requirement because all properties transferred from the former Agency are operated as affordable housing or have been sold. The Housing Successor also oversees $23.3 million in loans receivable from First-Time Homebuyer Loans (7) and Developer Loans (11)issued by the former Agency.However,it is important to note that the majority of the loans receivable have been recorded as uncollectible in the Housing Asset Fund balance sheet.This is because many of the loans are not payable unless a property is sold or other conditions are met.Any loan repayments would be deposited into the Housing Asset Fund. No new loans were added in FY 2021-22. Expenditure Proportionality Requirements Expenditures from the Housing Asset Fund must meet specific proportionality requirements by income level and age. In general: ·Administrative and monitoring expenses are capped at five percent of the value of Housing Successor properties and loans receivable on an annual basis.The cap was $367,929 million in Fiscal Year 2021- 22. ·Up to $250,000 may be spent annually on rapid rehousing solutions for homelessness. ·If Housing Asset Funds are spent on housing projects and programs,within each five-year compliance period: o At least 30%must be spent on extremely low-income households (earning up to 30%of the Area Median Income); o No more than 20%may be spent on low-income households (earning 60-80%of the Area Median Income); and o No monies may be spent on moderate or above moderate-income households (earning more than 80% of the Area Median Income). ·No more than 50%of rental housing units assisted by the City or the former Redevelopment Agency in City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™129 File #:23-182 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:8. the prior 10 years may be restricted to seniors. The Housing Successor meets the expenditure requirements because administrative and rapid rehousing expenses were below the annual limits,and there were no expenditures on housing development projects.The Housing Successor also meets the senior housing requirement.Of the 359 rental units assisted by the Redevelopment Agency or City within the last 10 years,81 (23%)are restricted to seniors.Staff will ensure these requirements continue to be met with future expenditures. Excess Surplus Housing successors are subject to the same excess surplus requirement as former redevelopment agencies.An agency has an excess surplus if its unencumbered cash balance is greater than $1 million or if it exceeds the sum of deposits in the prior four years,whichever is greater.Housing successors must spend or encumber excess surplus within three fiscal years or transfer its excess surplus to HCD to spend on statewide housing programs. South San Francisco's Housing Successor has an excess surplus $1,076,383 for FY 2021-22.The Housing Asset Fund’s beginning cash balance ($2.5 million)is greater than the sum of deposits in the prior four years ($1.4 million).Additionally,the Housing Successor did not encumber or expend any funds on housing development projects during the fiscal year.Excess surplus must be accounted for separately and encumbered or expended within 3 fiscal years or by June 30,2025.If the Housing Successor fails to comply the remaining excess surplus must be transferred to HCD within 90 days of June 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT There are no implications of receiving and filing this annual report on the City’s activities as the housing successor agency to the former Agency. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Supporting affordable housing,and providing funding for affordable housing,is in line with the City’s Strategic Plan Priority #2: Quality of Life, providing a full range of housing options. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council approve a motion to receive and file the Housing Successor Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Attachments: 1.Housing Successor Annual Report FY 21-22 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™130 HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT South San Francisco Housing Successor Fiscal Year 2021-22 131 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 City as Housing Successor .................................................................................................................................... 1 Scope of This Housing Successor Annual Report ................................................................................................. 1 Assets Transferred to the Housing Successor ...................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Legal Requirements Pertaining to Housing Successors ........................................................................................ 2 Permitted Uses of Housing Asset Funds ............................................................................................................... 3 Limits on the Accumulation of Housing Funds (Excess Surplus) .......................................................................... 5 HOUSING ASSET FUND ACTIVITY ......................................................................................................................... 6 Deposits and Fund Balance ................................................................................................................................... 6 Expenditures .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Ending Cash and Fund Balance ............................................................................................................................ 7 Housing Successor Portfolio .................................................................................................................................. 7 Real Properties and Disposition Status .............................................................................................................. 8 Loans Receivable ............................................................................................................................................. 10 COMPLIANCE WITH EXPENDITURE & PRODUCTION LIMITS ........................................................................... 10 Proportionality Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 10 Senior Rental Housing Limit Compliance ............................................................................................................ 12 Excess Surplus .................................................................................................................................................... 13 OTHER INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Homeownership Unit Inventory ............................................................................................................................ 14 Transfers to Other Housing Successors .............................................................................................................. 16 APPENDIX 1 - HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS .................................................. 17 APPENDIX 2 – HOUSING ASSET FUND EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 18 APPENDIX 3 – HOUSING ASSET TRANSFER FORM .......................................................................................... 20 132 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 1 INTRODUCTION This Housing Successor Agency Annual Report (“Annual Report”) presents information on Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2021-22 expenditures and activities as required by Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) Section 34176.1(f), including but not limited to a housing successor’s compliance with certain expenditure activities over the year as well as a five-year planning period. This Annual Report is required of any housing successor to a former redevelopment agency. City as Housing Successor The City of South San Francisco (“City”) is the Housing Successor Agency (“Housing Successor”) to the former South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”) which was dissolved with all other redevelopment agencies statewide by the Legislature in 2012. At the time of dissolution, a housing successor was to be selected to transfer and be responsible for the remaining assets and liabilities of a former redevelopment agency. The City elected to be the Housing Successor to the Agency by adoption of Resolution No. 08-2012 on January 25, 2012. Scope of This Housing Successor Annual Report This Annual Report is limited to the Housing Successor’s activities as it relates to its role as a housing successor and is not necessarily comprehensive of all of the City's housing activities. This may include, but is not limited to, financial activities, property disposition, loan administration, monitoring of covenants, and affordable housing development. This Annual Report describes compliance with various annual, five- year, and ten-year housing expenditure and production requirements. FY 2021-22 is the third year of the current five-year compliance period for income proportionality, which began July 1, 2019, and ends June 30, 2024. This Annual Report is an addendum to the City’s Housing Element Annual Progress Report. Both are due to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) by April 1 annually. The Housing Successor’s audited financial statements will be posted on the City’s website when available and are incorporated herein by reference. Assets Transferred to the Housing Successor Upon the statewide dissolution of redevelopment in 2012, all rights, powers, committed assets, liabilities, duties, and obligations associated with the affordable housing activities of the Agency were transferred 133 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 2 to the Housing Successor. As one of its first duties as a housing successor, the City prepared and submitted to the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) an inventory of housing assets to be transferred from the former Agency. The inventory was enumerated on a Housing Asset Transfer Form (“HAT”) which included: 1. Real properties; 2. Personal properties; 3. Loans receivable; and 4. Rents/operations All items on the HAT were reviewed and ultimately approved by the DOF on August 31, 2012. A copy of the HAT is provided as Appendix 3. Once approved by DOF and as directed by law, the City, acting as housing successor, transferred these assets to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (“Housing Asset Fund”, Fund 241). Approval of the HAT set in motion a series of obligations by the City as a housing successor, as described in the following section. BACKGROUND This Section summarizes the legal requirements for use of housing successor assets that are addressed in this Annual Report. Legal Requirements Pertaining to Housing Successors In general, housing successors must comply with three major requirements pursuant to HSC Section 34176.1: 1. Expenditures and housing production are subject to income and age targets. 2. Housing successors may not accumulate an “excess surplus,” or a high unencumbered Housing Asset Fund balance based on certain thresholds. 3. Properties must be developed with affordable housing within five to ten years of DOF’s approval of the HAT. 134 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 3 Appendix 1 provides a detailed summary of the reporting requirements that are addressed in this Annual Report. Permitted Uses of Housing Asset Funds Pursuant to HSC Section 34176.1, Housing Asset Funds may be spent on: • Administrative costs for operation of the housing successor agency. The law allows a housing successor to spend the greater of: o $200,000 per year adjusted for inflation, or o 5 percent of the statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor and the value of loans and grants receivable from the HAT (“Portfolio”). According to HCD, the $200,000 per year adjusted for inflation limit in FY 2020-21 was $223,400. As of the date of this report, HCD has not published an updated limit for FY 2021-22. However, the net value of the Housing Successor’s real property and loans receivable (after an allowance for uncollectible) is $7,358,579, 5 percent of which is $367,929, which is significantly higher than the HCD limit. Therefore, South San Francisco’s FY 2021-22 annual administrative cost limit is $367,929, the higher of these amounts. • Homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services up to $250,000 per year if the former redevelopment agency did not have any outstanding inclusionary housing or replacement housing production requirements as of 2012. South San Francisco is eligible for this expense because it did not have any outstanding inclusionary or replacement housing requirements upon dissolution. • Affordable housing development assisting households up to 80 percent of the Area Median Income (“AMI”), subject to specific income and age targets over a five-year period. Five-Year Income Proportionality on Development Expenditures: Housing Asset Funds may be spent on development of affordable housing projects affordable to low, very low, and extremely low-income households. “Development” is defined in HSC Section 33413 and includes “new construction, substantial rehabilitation, the acquisition of long-term affordability covenants, or the preservation of assisted housing development that is eligible for prepayment 135 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 4 or termination or for which the expiration of rental restrictions is scheduled to occur within five years.” Over each successive five-year compliance period beginning in 2014, at least 30 percent of development expenditures must assist extremely low-income households (30 percent AMI), while no more than 20 percent may assist low-income households (between 60-80 percent AMI). The balance of the funds may be used on very low-income households (defined as households earning between 30-60 percent of AMI). The Housing Successor was compliant with Housing Asset Fund income proportionality expenditure requirements during the first five-year compliance period from January 1, 2014 through June 30, 2019. The current (second) five-year compliance period is July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2024. Note that housing successors must report expenditures by category each year, but compliance with income proportionality limits is measured every five years. For example, a housing successor could spend all its funds in a single year on households earning between 60-80 percent AMI, as long as it was 20 percent or less of the total expenditures during the five-year compliance period. Should a housing successor not spend at least 30 percent of its development expenditures for extremely low-income households, or exceeds the amount spent on low-income households, future expenditures are subject to greater restrictions until these proportionality targets are met. Specifically, if a housing successor is unable to spend at least 30 percent of its development expenditures on extremely low-income units, it is required to increase this spending to 50 percent until compliant with the 30 percent threshold; a housing successor that spends more than 20 percent of its development expenditures on low-income units cannot spend any further funds on low-income developments until it is at or below the 20 percent threshold. As such, tracking these expenditures and their progress over the corresponding five-year period is an important function of this Annual Report. Ten-Year Age Proportionality on Units Assisted: If more than 50 percent of the total aggregate number of rental units produced by the city, housing successor, or former 136 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 5 redevelopment agency during the past 10 years are restricted to seniors, the housing successor may not spend more Housing Asset Funds on senior rental housing. It is important to stress that Housing Successor expenditure and production requirements are measured on different timeframes: • One-Year Limits: Administrative Allowance and Homeless Prevention Allowance. Compliance evaluated annually and resets every year. • Five-Year Limit: Expenditures by Income Level. Compliance evaluated over a fixed five-year period set by law, the current period being July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2024. • Ten-Year Limit: Number of Senior Deed-Restricted Units Assisted. Compliance evaluated based on a rolling ten-year period that is different every year, the current period being FY 2012-13 to FY 2021-22. Appendix 2 describes Housing Asset Fund expenditure requirements in more detail, including the types of costs eligible in each category. Limits on the Accumulation of Housing Funds (Excess Surplus) State law limits how much cash a housing successor may retain and, if it fails to commit and spend these dollars in a reasonable timeframe, ultimately penalizes the housing successor by requiring unspent funds to be transferred to HCD for use on State housing programs. HSC Section 34176.1(d) establishes a limit, known as an “excess surplus” on the amount of unencumbered Housing Asset Funds based on the greater of: • $1,000,000, or • The total amount of deposits made into the Housing Asset Fund over the preceding four years. Only amounts in excess of this threshold are considered an excess surplus. Once an excess surplus is determined, a housing successor must account for these funds separately and encumber said monies within three years. If after the third year the excess surplus has not been fully encumbered, the remaining balance of the excess surplus is to be transferred to HCD within 90 days. HCD is permitted to use these 137 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 6 transferred excess surplus funds anywhere in the State under its Multifamily Housing Program or the Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program. As part of the Annual Report, a housing successor must disclose any excess surplus and describe the housing successor’s plan for eliminating this excess surplus. HOUSING ASSET FUND ACTIVITY This section describes FY 2021-22 Housing Asset Fund activity and balances. Deposits and Fund Balance The Housing Successor had net deposits of $148,275 in the Housing Asset Fund during FY 2021-22 from a variety of sources, as shown in Table 1. Expenditures The Housing Successor expended a total of $344,378 during FY 2021-22. Of the total amount expended, $238,195 was spent on administrative costs and $106,183 was spent on homeless prevention and rapid rehousing (Emergency Rental Assistance). Both were well under their respective expenditure limits, with a maximum administrative cost limit for FY 2021-22 of $367,929 (based on 5 percent of the Housing Successor's Portfolio Balance) and a Homeless Prevention/Rapid Rehousing cost limit of $250,000. The City did not make any affordable housing development related expenditures and therefore remains in compliance with the proportionality requirement for the current five-year period. Source Amount Rent Revenue 131,272$ Interest Income - Investments 22,301$ Interest Income - Loans/ Advances 18,481$ Unrealized Gains/Losses (110,022)$ Interest Income - Lease GASB 87 36,383$ Equity Sharing Revenues 47,076$ Transfers 2,784$ Total 148,275$ Housing Asset Fund Deposits FY 2021-22 Table 1 Source: City of South San Francisco Finance Department 138 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 7 Ending Cash and Fund Balance The Housing Asset Fund had an ending asset balance $4,240,212 as of June 30, 2022, as summarized in Table 2. Housing Successor Portfolio The Housing Successor Portfolio as of FY 2021-22 includes four properties and eighteen loans receivable. No new loans were added in FY 2021-22. The Portfolio had a net value of $7,358,579 as of FY 2021-22, as detailed in Table 3. Note that the Loans Receivable are mostly offset by an “Allowance for Uncollectible” indicating that the City does not anticipate repayment. This is because many of the loans do not become due and payable unless a property is sold or other conditions are met. Asset Amount Cash 2,544,901$ Unrealized Gains/Losses (58,512) Accounts Receivable - Other 5,075 Accrued Interest Receivable 7,634 Cash Premium/Discount Amortization (16,469) Loans Receivable 23,260,345 Allowance for Uncollectible (22,700,107) Lease Receivable GASB 87 1,197,345 Ending Balance 4,240,212$ Housing Asset Fund Assets Ending Balance FY 2021-22 Table 2 Source: City of South San Francisco Finance Department 139 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 8 REAL PROPERTIES AND DISPOSITION STATUS Pursuant to the approved HAT, the former Agency transferred eight properties to the Housing Successor, including four multifamily properties, two single family homes, and two parcels of land (land under existing buildings). HSC Section 34176.1(e) requires all real properties acquired by a redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012 and transferred to the housing successor to be developed pursuant to the requirements detailed in HSC Section 33334.16. All property that falls within these parameters must be developed for affordable housing purposes or sold by August 31, 2017. If the Housing Successor is unable to develop or dispose of these properties within the five-year period, the law allows for a five-year extension via adoption of a resolution. All Housing Successor properties transferred on the Housing Asset Transfer Form are subject to this provision. The City meets the property disposition requirement because all properties transferred from the former Agency to the Housing Successor are already operating as affordable housing or have been sold. Descriptions of the properties and their disposition status are below. Properties Disposed Asset Amount Real Properties 339 - 341 Commercial 804,086$ 714 - 718 Linden 576,011 630 Baden - Land 948,244 636 El Camino - Land 4,470,000 Subtotal 6,798,341$ Loans Receivable First-Time Homebuyer Loans (7)209,714$ Developer Loans (11)23,050,631 Allowance for Uncollectibles (22,700,107) Subtotal 560,238$ Total Portfolio Value $7,358,579 Source: City of South San Francisco Finance Department Portfolio Value of Real Properties and Loans Receivable FY 2021-22 Table 3 140 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 9 • 310 - 314 MILLER (APNs 012-311-230, 240, & 250) – Three properties consisting of 13,000 square feet total were donated in May 2016 to Rotary Plaza, Inc. for $1 for the purpose of developing affordable multifamily housing. The property has 81 affordable units, which are to remain affordable for no less than 55 years. • 380 ALTA VISTA (APN 013-232-170) - A single-family home sits on this 9,100-square foot lot. It was initially purchased by the Agency to remove blighting conditions and illegal bedrooms in the home. The property was sold in October 2016 and $1,016,276 in sales proceeds were deposited into the Housing Asset Fund. The funds will be used for affordable housing purposes as required by law. Properties Retained • 339 – 341 COMMERCIAL (APN 012-333-050) - This 2,500-square foot lot contains two duplexes. The City purchased the property in 1999 with funding from the former Agency, as well as HOME funds, to mitigate the blighted property and create affordable housing units. • 714 – 718 LINDEN (APN 012-145-430) - A triplex sits on this 3,500-square foot lot located near the City’s Downtown core. The City initially helped the owner rehabilitate the property in return for charging affordable rents. In 2005, when the affordability restriction expired and the owner intended to sell the property, the City purchased the property with funding from the former Agency to preserve the units’ affordability. • 630 BADEN (APN 012-241-230) - The Housing Successor owns 95,309-square feet of land under the Magnolia Plaza Senior Apartments, a 125-unit affordable senior apartment complex. The City purchased the Magnolia/Baden property from a local school district using funding from the former Agency and leases the land to Magnolia Plaza Associates as affordable housing. • 636 EL CAMINO (APN 014-160-040) - The Housing Successor owns 87,121-square feet of land under an affordable multifamily development operated by MidPen Housing. The former Agency entered into a $9,988,434 loan agreement and ground lease with MP South City II, L.P. in March 2011 for the development of affordable units. The project consists of 108 affordable units, which are to remain affordable for no less than 75 years. 141 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 10 LOANS RECEIVABLE The former Agency initially transferred thirty-three loan agreements as part of the approved HAT. There are currently eighteen loans receivable as of FY 2021-22. The outstanding loans are described below: • Seven First-Time Homebuyer Loans are administered by the Housing Successor with an outstanding balance of $209,714 as of June 30, 2022. The loans were issued to assist low and moderate-income first-time home buyers. Since the former Agency’s dissolution, sixteen out of twenty-one loans that had been transferred were paid off, and 2 new loans have been issued. • Eleven Developer Loans are administered by the Housing Successor with an outstanding balance of $23,050,631 as of June 30, 2022. The loans were issued to develop affordable housing throughout the City. A total of twelve developer loans were transferred on the HAT, of which two have been paid off since dissolution. Additionally, a new loan to developer ROEM was added in FY 2020-21 to assist a scattered development project at two locations: 201-219 Grand Avenue and 418 Linden Avenue. The Grand Avenue development comprises 47 residential units and about 5,000 square feet of ground-floor commercial space located on former RDA property. The Linden Avenue development comprises 37 residential units on former City land. The project is governed by a Development Agreement as well as an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement. It is important to note that $22.7 million of the loans receivable value is accounted for in the "Allowance for Uncollectibles", as shown in the asset balance in Table 2. This is because many of the loans are not due and payable unless a property is sold or other conditions are met. COMPLIANCE WITH EXPENDITURE & PRODUCTION LIMITS During the 2021-22 Fiscal Year, the Housing Successor was in compliance with all annual and five and ten-year planning period requirements as described in this section. Proportionality Requirements As summarized in Figure 1 below, the Housing Successor fully complied with all Housing Asset Fund spending restrictions: 142 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 11 • During FY 2021-22, the Housing Successor expended $238,195 on allowable administrative expenses which is well under the current year maximum limit of $367,929. The annual limit on administrative expenses is the greater of $200,000 (plus inflation), or 5 percent of the Housing Successor Portfolio balance. As shown in Table 3, the Portfolio balance is $7,358,579, of which 5 percent is $367,929. • During FY 2021-22, the Housing Successor used $106,183 of Housing Asset Funds for homeless prevention or rapid rehousing expenses and was therefore in compliance with the $250,000 spending restriction. • The Housing Successor spent $0 on affordable housing development-related expenditures during FY 2021-22. To date, the only expenditure on housing developments made during the current five-year compliance was made in FY 2020-21 and was entirely allocated to extremely low-income households (30 percent AMI or below). Therefore, the Housing Successor currently meets the five-year income proportionality targets. 143 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 12 Figure 1: FY 2021-22 Housing Asset Fund Expenditure Summary The Housing Successor will ensure it continues to meet all Housing Asset Fund expenditure requirements throughout this five-year compliance period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2024 and future five-year compliance periods. Failure to comply with the extremely low income requirement in any five-year compliance period would result in the Housing Successor having to ensure that 50 percent of remaining funds be spent on extremely low income rental units until in compliance. Exceeding the expenditure limit for low-income households earning between 60-80 percent AMI in any five-year reporting period will result in the Housing Successor not being able to expend any additional funds on these income categories until in compliance. Senior Rental Housing Limit Compliance Pursuant to HSC Section 34176(b), a maximum of 50 percent of deed-restricted rental housing units assisted by the former Agency, Housing Successor, or City in the previous 10 years may be restricted to $238,195/ $1,502,934 $106,183/ $250,000 $2,450,000 $0 $0$0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 Administration/ Monitoring Homeless Prevention/ Rapid Rehousing Ext. Low Rental 30% AMI (30% minimum) Very Low 31-59% AMI (no limit) Low 60-80% AMI (20% maximum) South San Francisco Expenditures Comply with Limits Limit Annual Limits Five-Year ComplianceAnnual Limits Five-Year ComplianceAnnual Limits Five-Year ComplianceAnnual Limits Five-Year Compliance 144 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 13 seniors. The Housing Successor complies with the limit allowing no more than 50 percent of the total aggregate number of rental units produced within the preceding ten years to be restricted to seniors. The Housing Successor, City, and former Agency collectively assisted 359 deed-restricted rental units in the last ten years, 81 of which are restricted to seniors. Within the last 10 years, 23 percent of the deed- restricted units assisted by the Housing Successor, City, and former Agency are restricted to seniors, well below the limit. Table 4 details units assisted by project. Excess Surplus The Housing Asset Fund may not accumulate an “excess surplus”, or an unencumbered cash balance that exceeds the greater of either $1 million or the sum of deposits in the prior four fiscal years. This requirement ensures that housing successors are actively spending available Housing Asset Funds on affordable housing. At the beginning of the FY 2021-22, the Housing Successor had an unencumbered cash balance of $2,455,679 which exceeds the total amount of deposits over the prior four years which amount to $1,379,296. Therefore, the Housing Successor has an excess surplus of $1,076,383 for FY 2021-22 as shown in Table 5 below. Property1,2 Senior Units %Non-Senior Units %Total Units 310 Miller 81 100%0 0%81 201-219 Grand Avenue 0 0%47 100%47 418 Linden Avenue 0 0%37 100%37 1051 Mission Road 0 0%158 100%158 432 Baden 0 0%36 100%36 Total 81 278 359 Total Deed-Restricted Senior Units:23% 1 This list only includes units identified as senior-restricted living in the Housing Element. 2 This list only includes units that had a ground lease executed within the last 10 years. Source: City of San Francisco Table 4 Deed-Restricted Senior Rental Units Assisted Prior Ten Years 145 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 14 Excess surplus funds must be accounted for separately and expended or encumbered within three fiscal years. If a housing successor fails to comply, it must transfer any excess surplus to HCD within 90 days of the end of the third fiscal year. Accordingly, the Housing Successor will ensure that these funds are expended or encumbered by FY 2024-25 and will continue to monitor its deposits and expenditures to avoid any future excess surplus. OTHER INFORMATION Homeownership Unit Inventory Table 6 presents an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the Housing Successor that require restrictions, covenants, or an adopted program that protects Housing Asset Fund monies. Fiscal Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Total 4-Year Deposits Deposits 585,163$ 304,949$ 310,800$ 178,383$ 1,379,296$ FY 2021-22 Beginning Cash Balance 2,455,679$ Less: Encumbered Funds 1 -$ Unencumbered Amount2 2,455,679$ Step 1 $1 Million, or 1,000,000$ Last 4 Years Deposits 1,379,296$ Result: Larger Number 1,379,296$ Step 2 Unencumbered Cash Balance 2,455,679$ Larger Number From Step 1 1,379,296$ Excess Surplus 1,076,383$ 2 As of July 1, 2021 Table 5 Excess Surplus Calculation FY 2021-22 146 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 15 Project Name / Address1 Unit No. Covenant Expiration Affordability Period (Yrs) 1 Manday Place # 802 1 3/21/35 25 1488 ECR #101 1 2/8/64 55 1488 ECR #104 1 3/24/64 55 1488 ECR #106 1 5/1/67 55 1488 ECR #115 1 8/21/64 55 1488 ECR #202 1 11/18/64 55 1488 ECR #205 1 6/16/64 55 1488 ECR #210 1 7/14/64 55 1488 ECR #214 1 7/21/64 55 1488 ECR #216 1 10/16/64 55 1488 ECR #217 1 6/30/64 55 1488 ECR #220 1 6/30/64 55 1488 ECR #223 1 3/16/65 55 1488 ECR #304 1 11/10/64 55 1488 ECR #313 1 12/9/64 55 1488 ECR #314 1 10/25/64 55 2 Farm Road 1 11/13/58 55 2200 Gellert Blvd #6103 1 7/21/39 30 2200 Gellert Blvd #6111 1 11/1/36 30 2200 Gellert Blvd #6203 1 3/2/37 30 2200 Gellert Blvd #6205 1 2/10/37 30 2200 Gellert Blvd #6207 1 11/3/36 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5101 1 10/1/54 45 2210 Gellert Blvd #5103 1 1/30/37 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5107 1 7/19/37 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5203 1 1/30/38 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5205 1 4/19/37 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5209 1 1/30/37 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5211 1 1/30/37 30 2210 Gellert Blvd #5309 1 1/30/37 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4101 1 6/10/37 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4103 1 10/3/37 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4107 1 6/8/37 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4111 1 6/14/37 30 Table 6 Homeownership Unit Inventory 147 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 16 Transfers to Other Housing Successors There were no transfers to another housing successor entity for a joint project pursuant to HSC Section 34176.1(c)(2). Project Name / Address1 Unit No. Covenant Expiration Affordability Period (Yrs) 2220 Gellert Blvd #4205 1 7/29/05 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4211 1 5/26/37 30 2220 Gellert Blvd #4309 1 7/17/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3103 1 2/25/38 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3105 1 12/31/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3107 1 12/3/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3109 1 12/10/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3203 1 12/10/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3205 1 6/10/37 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #3209 1 1/8/38 30 2230 Gellert Blvd #4109 1 12/3/37 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2101 1 9/25/38 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2103 1 10/6/38 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2107 1 8/29/63 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2111 1 3/6/39 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2203 1 10/6/38 30 2250 Gellert Blvd #2303 1 10/6/38 30 2260 Gellert Blvd #1107 1 11/12/43 30 2260 Gellert Blvd #1111 1 7/31/05 30 2260 Gellert Blvd #1207 1 5/18/39 30 260 Hillside Blvd 1 1/24/58 55 3775 Radburn Drive 1 2/15/34 30 3855 Carter Drive #203 1 9/1/34 25 438 Commercial Ave 1 6/30/60 55 440 Commercial Ave 1 6/30/60 55 441 2nd Lane 1 6/30/60 55 443 2nd Lane 1 6/30/60 55 56 Farm Road 1 1/19/61 55 61 Farm Court 1 7/25/05 30 936 Commercial Ave 1 11/10/41 30 942 Mission Road 1 4/21/35 25 958 Commercial Ave 1 8/25/64 55 Source: City of South San Francisco 1 2200 Gellert Blvd #6109, #5105, #5111 and #5303 were released from their respective Restrictions 148 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 17 APPENDIX 1 - HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS Health and Safety Code Section 34176.1(f) Housing Asset Fund Revenues & Expenditures Total amount deposited in the Housing Asset Fund for the fiscal year. Amount of deposits funded by a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”). Statement of balance at the close of the fiscal year. Description of Expenditures for the fiscal year, broken out as follows: • Homeless prevention and rapid rehousing • Administrative and monitoring • Housing development expenses by income level assisted Description of any transfers to another housing successor for a joint project. Other Assets and Active Projects Description of any project(s) funded through the ROPS. Update on property disposition efforts (note that housing successors may only hold property for up to five years, unless it is already developed with affordable housing). Other “portfolio” balances, including: • Statutory value of any real property either transferred from the former Agency or purchased by the Housing Asset Fund • Value of loans and grants receivable Inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former Agency or the housing successor that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former Agency’s investment of monies from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Obligations & Proportionality Description of any outstanding production obligations of the former Agency that were inherited by the Housing Successor. Compliance with proportionality requirements (income group targets), which must be upheld on a five-year cycle. Percentage of deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the former Agency, the Housing Successor, or the City within the past ten years compared to the total number of units assisted by any of those three agencies. Amount of any excess surplus, and, if any, the plan for eliminating it. 149 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 18 APPENDIX 2 – HOUSING ASSET FUND EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS Health and Safety Code Section 34176.1 Expense Category Limits Allowable Uses Administration and Compliance Monitoring Measured Annually $367,929 limit for FY 2021- 22 (limit varies each year) Administrative activities such as: • Professional services (consultant fees, auditor fees, etc.) • Staff salaries, benefits, and overhead for time spent on Housing Successor administration • Compliance monitoring to ensure compliance with affordable housing and loan agreements • Property maintenance at Housing Successor-owned properties Capped at $200,000 adjusted annually for inflation ($223,400 for FY 20-21) or 5 % of the statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor and the value of loans and grants receivable from the HAT (“Portfolio”) ($367,929 for FY 21-22), whichever is greater. Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Solutions Measured Annually $250,000 maximum per fiscal year Services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless but for this assistance, including: • Contributions toward the construction of local or regional homeless shelters • Housing relocation and stabilization services including housing search, mediation, or outreach to property owners • Short-term or medium-term rental assistance • Security or utility deposits • Utility payments • Moving cost assistance • Credit repair • Case management • Other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing of persons who have become homeless. Affordable Housing Development No spending limit, but must comply with income and age targets “Development” includes: • New construction • Acquisition and rehabilitation • Substantial rehabilitation • Acquisition of long-term affordability covenants on multifamily units • Preservation of at-risk units whose affordable rent restrictions would otherwise expire over the next five years 150 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 19 Health and Safety Code Section 34176.1 Expense Category Limits Allowable Uses Income Targets Fixed Five- Year Compliance Period (currently FY 2019-20 to FY 2023-24) Every five years (currently FYE 2020-2024), Housing Asset Funds must meet income targets: • At least 30% on extremely low-income rental households (up to 30% AMI or “Area Median Income”) • No more than 20% on low-income households (60-80% AMI) Moderate and above moderate-income households may not be assisted (above 80% AMI). Failure to comply with the extremely low-income requirement in any five-year compliance period will result in having to ensure that 50 percent of remaining funds be spent on extremely low income rental units until in compliance. Exceeding the expenditure limit for low households earning between 60-80% AMI in any five-year reporting period will result in not being able to expend any funds on these income categories until in compliance. Age Targets Rolling Ten- Year Period (looks back at prior ten years) For the prior ten years (resets every year), a maximum of 50% of deed-restricted rental housing units assisted by the Housing Successor or its host jurisdiction may be restricted to seniors. If a housing successor fails to comply, Housing Asset Funds may not be spent on deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors until in compliance. 151 South San Francisco Housing Successor Annual Report 2021-22 20 APPENDIX 3 – HOUSING ASSET TRANSFER FORM The Housing Asset Transfer Form is attached as a separate document. 152 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-174 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:9. Report regarding a resolution approving Parcel Map 22-1236 for the purposes of dedicating new public easements and splitting the existing parcel into three lots as part of the 180 El Camino Real Redevelopment project;and authorizing the recording of said Parcel Map and all related documents with the San Mateo County Recorder.(Jason Hallare, Senior Civil Engineer) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Parcel Map 22-1236 for the purposes of dedicating new public easements and splitting the existing parcel into three lots as part of the 180 El Camino Real Redevelopment project;and authorizing the recording of said Parcel Map and all related documents with the San Mateo County Recorder. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Steelwave,LLC is redeveloping the existing 180 El Camino Real property into a mixed use and life sciences campus.On September 14,2022,the Planning Commission approved entitlements for the Phase 2 project consisting of three new R&D/life sciences,one new residential,and one parking structure at the 11.214-acre remainder parcel of 180 El Camino Real (APN 014-183-110)previously subdivided as part of Parcel Map 22- 0269. The location and visual depiction are shown in Attachment 1. The proposed redeveloped site and structures require dedication of public easements pursuant to the conditions of approval for the project (P21-0126/UP21-0013).Along the El Camino Real frontage,a new public access easement for pedestrian sidewalks will be created.Through the site’s rear (southeastern)roadway,a new emergency access easement for emergency vehicle access will be created.The locations of these new easements and site overview are shown in Attachment 2. There are existing public easements.A public sanitary sewer easement and a public emergency vehicle access easement along the Internal Drive must remain.The parcel map identifies these existing easements as “S.S.E” and “E.V.A.E.”respectively.A public storm drain easement along the South Spruce frontage must also remain. The existing easements are shown in Attachment 2. Parcel Map The City Engineer and the City’s technical reviewer,with concurrence of all affected City departments and divisions,have determined that the parcel map for 180 El Camino Real (“Parcel Map 22-1236”),described in Exhibit A of the attached resolution is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act,the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, and all applicable conditions of approval for said development. Parcel Map 22-1236 will split the existing 11.214-acre parcel into a 1.904-acre Parcel B,6.063-acre Parcel C, and 3.247-acre Parcel D to construct the new buildings.The site is served by the public roads:El Camino Real to the southwest and Huntington Avenue to the northeast. A subdivision improvement agreement is not included as part of this parcel map because the conditions of approval did not require a subdivision improvement agreement nor any major public improvements aside from frontage improvements.All other improvements in the right-of-way will be covered by an encroachment permit that the Developer will obtain prior to building permit issuance and be covered by an encroachment permit City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™153 File #:23-174 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:9. that the Developer will obtain prior to building permit issuance and be covered by an encroachment permit bond. FISCAL IMPACT Approving the parcel map will have no fiscal impact on the City. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this parcel map will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by promoting a full range of employment through development in SSF Priority Area 2, Initiative 2.4. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Parcel Map 22-1236 for 180 El Camino Real, authorizing the recordation of the parcel map and all related documents. Attachments: 1.Location and Visual 2.Easements City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™154 CrestmoorCanyon ·82 %&280 %&380 N:\Projects\2022_Projects\SF22-1215_180ECR\Graphics\AI101 ·82 %&280 %&380 Project Site SamTrans Hub City Limits BART Caltrain Centennial Way Trail S Maple AveHun�ngton AveMiller Av e Baden A v e San Mateo AveChestnut AveS Ai r por t Blvd Westborough Bl El Cami no Real El Cami no Real San B ru n o A ve W Harbor WyS Linden AveOrange AveGrand Ave N McDonne l l Rd U ta h A v eGateway BlSneath LaneSan Bruno Ave E Cher r y AveDor a do Wy Spruce AveAvalon DrMitchell Ave San Bruno South San Francisco DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN LINDENVILLE BAYHILL TanforanShopping Center OrangeMemorial Park San Bruno South San Francisco San Bruno South San Francisco San Bruno BART CALTRAIN CALTRAIN 0.5 mi 0.25 mi 155 Source: Skidmore, Owings, & Merrill LLP SAFEW AY RESIDEN TI AL BLDG 01 BLDG 03 BLDG 02 GARA GE EL CAMI N O R E A L N:\Projects\2022_Projects\SF22-1215_180ECR\Graphics\AI156 N:\Projects\2022_Projects\SF22-1215_180ECR\Graphics\AISource: Skidmore, Owings, & Merrill LLP GROUND LEVEL PLAN EL CAMINO MIXED USE PROJECT SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP EL CAMINO REALS SPRUC E A VE HUNTINGTON AVER&D BLDG 01 R&D BLDG 02 R&D BLDG 03 SAFEWAY GARAGE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENTRIES & ACCESS CAMPUS AMENITIES S SPRUC E A VE HUNTINGTON AVER&D R&D SAFEWAY RESIDENTIAL LOBBY LOBBY LOBBY LOBBY BLDG 01 AMENITIES BLDG 03 BLDG 02 GARAGE EL CAMINO REAL157 N:\Projects\2022_Projects\SF22-1215_180ECR\Graphics\AISource: Skidmore, Owings, & Merrill LLP GROUND LEVEL PLAN EL CAMINO MIXED USE PROJECT SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP EL CAMINO REALS SPRUC E A VE HUNTINGTON AVER&D BLDG 01 R&D BLDG 02 R&D BLDG 03 SAFEWAY GARAGE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENTRIES & ACCESS CAMPUS AMENITIES S SPRUC E A VE HUNTINGTON AVER&D R&D SAFEWAY RESIDENTIAL LOBBY LOBBY LOBBY LOBBY BLDG 01 AMENITIES BLDG 03 BLDG 02 GARAGE EL CAMINO REAL158 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-175 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:9a Resolution approving Parcel Map 22-1236 for the purposes of dedicating new public easements and splitting the existing parcel into three lots as part of the 180 El Camino Real Redevelopment project;and authorizing the recording of said Parcel Map and all related documents with the San Mateo County Recorder. WHEREAS,on September 14,2022,the Planning Commission approved entitlements for Steelwave,LLC (“Developer”)to construct three new R&D/life sciences,one new residential,and one parking structures (“Project”)at the 11.214-acre remainder parcel of 180 El Camino Real (APN 014-183-110)Phase 2 previously subdivided as part of Parcel Map 22-0269 (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS,the Project will require dedication of a new public access easement for pedestrian sidewalk access along the El Camino Real frontage; and WHEREAS,the Project will require dedication of a new emergency vehicle access easement for emergency services access through the Project’s rear internal access road; and WHEREAS,the existing public storm drain easement,public sanitary sewer easement,and emergency vehicle access easement will remain; and WHEREAS, the existing public sewer easement will be relocated by separate instruments; and WHEREAS,the City Engineer and the City’s technical reviewer,with concurrence of all affected City departments and divisions,have determined that the parcel map for 180 El Camino Real,described in Exhibit A City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™159 File #:23-175 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:9a departments and divisions,have determined that the parcel map for 180 El Camino Real,described in Exhibit A and titled Parcel Map 22-1236,is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act,the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, and all applicable tentative map conditions of approval for said development; and WHEREAS,Parcel Map 22-1236 will split the existing 11.214-acre parcel into a 1.904-acre Parcel B,6.063- acre Parcel C,and 3.247-acre Parcel D to construct the Project served by the public roads:El Camino Real and South Spruce Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco: 1.City Council approves the Parcel Map 22-1236 for 180 El Camino Real and accepts all associated dedications; and 2.City Council authorizes recordation of the Parcel Map for 180 El Camino Real and all related documents; and 3.City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute any other documents or to take any other action consistent with the intent of this Resolution, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. Exhibits: 1.Exhibit A - Draft Parcel Map ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™160 161 162 163 164 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-191 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:10. Report regarding adoption of a resolution approving a third amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates and amending the total budget for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project.(Angel Torres, Senior Civil Engineer) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a third amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates for an additional $88,344.90,for a total amount not to exceed $448,064.90,extending the contract term,and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000 for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The South San Francisco Smart Corridors Expansion Project (“Project”)is part of the overall countywide traffic management system Smart Corridors deployment. The Project is not a traditional project where physical roadway improvements are made,but an implementation of traffic management devices that will enable the City,state law enforcement agencies,and fire departments to proactively and cooperatively manage freeway and arterial traffic congestion during major freeway incidents. ITS infrastructure improvements fall under four categories:arterial management,incident management,traveler information and transit management. The Project will extend the San Mateo County Smart Corridors deployment north to include routes located in the City and include:Airport Boulevard,Oyster Point Road,Gateway Boulevard and Grand Avenue (from the southern City limits to the Grand Avenue/Gateway Boulevard intersection).The project will also support the overall San Mateo County Smart Corridors program. The Project work includes the installation of: -Directional (trailblazer) signs; -Fixed closed-circuit television cameras; -Arterial dynamic message signs; -Traffic signal controllers; -Microwave vehicle detection systems; and -Fiber optic cable communications connections. Because the Project will take place within the South San Francisco city boundary,the City will be the “Implementing Agency”leading the construction phase and administering the construction contract.However, C/CAG will remain as the overall “Project Sponsor”of the Smart Corridor Project and provide funding for the Project. Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn and Associates Consulting Services Agreement Kimley-Horn and Associates (“Kimley-Horn”)is the City’s design engineer for the Smart Corridor Expansion City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™165 File #:23-191 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:10. Kimley-Horn and Associates (“Kimley-Horn”)is the City’s design engineer for the Smart Corridor Expansion Project.To date,Kimley-Horn has provided professional services to complete the design,permitting, construction documents and reviewed the majority of the material submittals and Requests for Information (RFIs)received.As the Project transitioned into the construction phase after a long time set-back due to Covid- 19,and material procurement issues,the design team continued attending weekly progress meetings,reviewing material submittals,RFIs and design proposed design changes due to site conditions.Staff recommends approving a third amendment to Kimley-Horn’s consulting services agreement to provide additional design support during construction services.The additional design support during construction would include items that require design engineer’s input that typically come up on these types of construction projects including: -Complete remaining material submittal reviews -Review and respond to contractor requests for information (RFIs) -Review and prepare revised documents for Contract Change Orders (CCOs) -Prepare Construction Record Drawings -Attend Construction Field Visits -Attend Construction Weekly Progress Meetings The following details the amendments to the design support budget for Kimley-Horn through design and construction: Design Support Budget Original Second Amendment Third Amendment Budget $280,000.00 $280,000.00 $280,000.00 +Contingency $56,000.00 $35,972.00 $51,935.10 +Design Support During Construction $79,720.00 $168,064.90 Total Project Design Amended Budget $336,000.00 $395,692.00 $500,000.00 The contingency for Kimley-Horn will be utilized for any unforeseen site conditions during construction requiring additional support to prepare responses for RFIs or CCOs. With the increase in dollar amount under the contract,staff also recommends the term of the agreement be extended from December 31, 2023 to May 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT Adopting this resolution will have no fiscal impact to the City.This project is included in the City of South San Francisco’s Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvements Program (Project No.tr2002)and is funded through State and County funding.The amendment to the consulting services agreement is within the $8.159M construction budget. A breakdown for the project funding can be seen in the following table: State State Transportation Improvement Program $2.044M State Traffic Light Synchronization Program $3.598M C/CAG County Measure M $0.917M C/CAG County Measure M $1.600M Total Construction Funding $8.159MCity of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™166 File #:23-191 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:10. State State Transportation Improvement Program $2.044M State Traffic Light Synchronization Program $3.598M C/CAG County Measure M $0.917M C/CAG County Measure M $1.600M Total Construction Funding $8.159M C/CAG, as the project sponsor, is funding the project and will also be responsible for any cost overrun. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Awarding this contract will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by providing traffic relief in that case of an accident along Highway 101 and supporting the overall Countywide Smart Corridors Program. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution a resolution approving a contract amendment with Kimley-Horn and Associates for an additional $88,344.90,for a total amount not to exceed $448,064.90 and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000.00,and authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements on behalf of the City,for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project (Project No. tr2002). City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™167 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-192 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:10a. Resolution approving an amendment to Kimley-Horn and Associate’s contract to provide additional design support during construction for an additional amount of $88,344.90,for a total amount not to exceed $448,064.90,extending the contract term,and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000,for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project (Project No. tr2002) WHEREAS,the South San Francisco Smart Corridors Expansion Project is part of the overall countywide traffic management system Smart Corridors deployment; and WHEREAS,Kimley-Horn and Associates is the City’s design engineer for the Smart Corridor Expansion Project; and WHEREAS,to date,Kimley-Horn has provided professional services to complete the design,permitting and construction documents and additional time and work are needed under contract; and WHEREAS,staff recommends approving an amendment to Kimley-Horn and Associate’s contract to provide additional design support during construction for an additional amount of $88,344.90,for an amount not to exceed $448,064.90,extending the contract term,and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of South San Francisco hereby takes the following actions: 1.Approves a Third Amendment with Kimley-Horn and Associates to the current Consulting Service Agreement,attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A,increasing the not to exceed amount by $88,344.90,for a total amount not to exceed $448,064.90 and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $500,000, and extending the term of said agreement. 2.Authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement amendment with Kimley-Horn and Associates, in substantially the same form as Exhibit A,and to make any revisions,amendments,or modifications deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution,which do not materially alter or increase the City’s obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the Finance Department to establish the Project Budget consistent with the information contained in the staff report and authorizes the City Manager to utilize unspent amount of the total Project budget,if necessary,towards the City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™168 File #:23-192 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:10a. authorizes the City Manager to utilize unspent amount of the total Project budget,if necessary,towards the construction contingency budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions consistent with the intention of the Staff Report and Resolution. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™169 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT is made at South San Francisco, California, as of (DATE), 2023, by and between THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (“City”), a municipal corporation, and KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (“Consultant”), (sometimes referred together as the “Parties”) who agree as follows: RECITALS A.On April 3, 2017, City and Consultant entered that certain Consulting Services Agreement (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide the City with certain services for the South San Francisco Smart Corridor Extension Project. A true and correct copy of the Agreement and its exhibits are attached as Attachment 1 – Kimley-Horn Original CSA. B.On October 20, 2021, City and Consultant executed a First Amendment to the Agreement to extend the Agreement term. A true and correct copy of the First Amendment and its exhibits are attached as Attachment 2 – First Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA. C.On January 26, 2022, City and Consultant executed a Second Amendment to the Agreement to extend the Agreement term and compensation amount. A true and correct copy of the Second Amendment and its exhibits are attached as Attachment 3 – Second Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA. D.City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to extend its term and amend the compensation amount. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 1.All terms which are defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment, unless specifically provided herein to the contrary. 2.Section 1.1: Term of Services. The end date for the term of service, as stated in Section 1.1 and amended by the First Amendment and Second Amendment, is hereby extended to May 31, 2024. 3.Section 2: Compensation. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended such that the City agrees to pay Consultant an additional sum of $88,344.90, for an amended total not-to-exceed amount of $448,064.90, with the understanding that up to $366,262.05 has already been paid to Consultant. Consultant agrees this is the City’s total contribution for payment of costs under the Agreement unless additional payments are authorized in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and said terms of payment are mutually agreed to by and between the parties inwriting.170 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA All other terms, conditions and provisions in the Agreement remain in full force and effect. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement will control unless specifically modified by this Amendment. [SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 171 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA Dated: 03/22/2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. By: By: City Manager Kwasi Akwabi-Ameyaw Assistant Secretary/Project Manager Approved as to Form: By: City Attorney Attest: By: City Clerk 172 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA Attachment 1 – Kimley-Horn Original CSA 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA Attachment 2 – First Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA 205 206 207 Exhibit A – Draft Third Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA Attachment 3 – Second Amendment to Kimley-Horn CSA 208 209 210 211 File Number: 21-743 City of South San Francisco City Council Resolution: RES 14-2022 P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Enactment Number: RES 14-2022 RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ECONOLITE SYSTEMS, INC. OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN ADDITIONAL $1,600,000 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM C/CAG, APPROVING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES AND APPROVING AN OWNERSHIP, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (C/CAG), ALL FOR THE SMART CORRIDORS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EXPANSION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. TR2002). WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Smart Corridors Expansion Project is part of the overall countywide traffic management system Smart Corridors deployment; and WHEREAS, the City issued a notice inviting bids for the project on October 19, 2021, and October 26, 2021, and received four (4) bid proposals in response; and WHEREAS, Econolite Systems, Inc. of Anaheim, California was the lowest responsible bidder and provided competitive unit prices; and WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Econolite Systems, Inc. of Anaheim, California in an amount not to exceed $5,372,702; and authorizing a construction contract authority budget of $5,909,972; and WHEREAS, C/CAG, as the funding agency for the project, approved a project budget of 6.559M in January 2021, which is funded in part by the State and in part by C/CAG; and WHEREAS, C/CAG has provided $0.917M of funding pursuant to a Funding Agreement between the City and C/CAG; and WHEREAS, in December 2021, C/CAG's Board of Directors approved increasing the C/CAG funding by $1.6M to cover the $1.2M related to the construction bids and $0.4M related to anticipated additional underground and integration costs for a total construction budget of $8.159M; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approving a Funding Agreement amendment with C/CAG accepting the additional $1.6M in funding for a total construction budget of $8.159M; and City of South San Francisco Page 1 212 File Number: 21-743 Enactment Number: RES 14-2022 WHEREAS, staff recommends approving Budget Amendment #22.043 which would amend the fiscal year 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program to increase the Smart Corridors Expansion Project tr2002) budget by $1.6M; and WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn and Associates is the City's design engineer for the Smart Corridor Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, to date, they have provided professional services to complete the design, permitting and construction documents; and WHEREAS, staff recommend approving an amendment to Kimley-Horn and Associate's contract to provide additional design support during construction for an additional amount of $79,720, for an amount not to exceed $359,720 and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $395,692; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2008, the City of South San Francisco executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between all participating parties in which the City agreed to work cooperatively and to provide input during the development of the Smart Corridors project; and WHEREAS, the executed MOU addressed the general objectives and framework of the Smart Corridors Project and was not intended to commit any agency to funding, or long-term significant maintenance and operations responsibilities, but particular agreement would be executed during the subsequent stages of the Project to set forth specific roles and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, as the Smart Corridor Project proceeds in SSF, the City and C/CAG have negotiated an Ownership, Operation and Maintenance Agreement outlines and defines the roles, responsibilities, terms, and conditions for the ownership, operation, and maintenance of equipment and components constructed as part of the Smart Corridors SSF Expansion; and WHEREAS, during major traffic incidents along the 101, Caltrans will control traffic signals, cameras and directional signs. A separate agreement will be drafted between the City and Caltrans outlining operations of traffic cameras and directional signs during major traffic incidents. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of South San Francisco hereby takes the following actions: Awards a construction contract for the Smart Corridors Expansion Project to Econolite System, Inc. of Anaheim, California, in an amount not to exceed $5,372,702, authorizing a total construction contract authority budget of $5,909,972, conditioned on Econolite Systems, Inc. timely execution of the Project contract and submission of all required documents, including but not limited to, certificates of insurance and endorsement, in accordance with the Project documents. 2. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the construction contract, a draft of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, and to make any revisions, amendments, or City of South San Francisco Page 2 213 File Number: 21-743 Enactment Number: RES 14-2022 modifications, deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution which do not materially alter or increase the City's obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. 3. Approves a Funding Agreement amendment with City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) accepting an additional $1.6M C/CAG funding for the construction phase of the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project. 4. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the Funding Agreement amendment, a draft of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein, and to make any revisions, amendments, or modifications, deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution which do not materially alter or increase the City's obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. 5. Approves Budget Amendment #22.043 which would amend the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program to increase the Smart Corridors Expansion Project (tr2002) budget by 1.6M. 6. Approves a First Amendment with Kimley-Horn and Associates to the current consulting service agreement, increasing the not to exceed amount by $79,720, for an amount not to exceed $359,720 and authorizing a total contract authority budget of $395,692. 7. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement amendment with Kimley-Horn and Associates, a draft of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein, and to make any revisions, amendments, or modifications deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution, which do not materially alter or increase the City's obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. 8. Approves executing an Ownership, Operations, and Maintenance Agreement with City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) for the Smart Corridors South San Francisco Expansion Project (Project No. tr2002). 9. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the Ownership, Operations, and Maintenance Agreement with City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG), a draft of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein, and to make any revisions, amendments, or modifications deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution, which do not materially alter or increase the City's obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the Finance Department to establish the Project Budget consistent with the information contained in the staff report and authorizes the City Manager to utilize unspent amount of the total Project, if necessary, towards the construction contingency budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions consistent with the intention of the Staff Report and Resolution. City of South San Francisco Page 3 214 File Number: 21-743 Enactment Number: RES 14-2022 At a meeting of the City Council on 1/26/2022, a motion was made by Councilmember Addiego, seconded by Councilmember Coleman, that this Resolution be approved. The motion passed. Yes: 5 Mayor Nagales, Vice Mayor Nicolas, Councilmember Coleman, Councilmember Flores, and Councilmember Addiego Attest by 41 Rosa Govea Aco City Clerk City of South San Francisco Page 4 215 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-217 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:11. Report regarding a resolution authorizing an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers program in South San Francisco and approving Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers (BLIS)program in South San Francisco and approve Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Big Lift Inspiring Summers program,supported by SMCo Measure K funds,will again operate two sites in South San Francisco (City),one at Spruce Elementary and another at Los Cerritos Elementary.This free,five- week,full day program,scheduled from June 14 -July 20,2023,includes reading,science and art projects,and learning-focused fun and games for children entering kindergarten,1st,2nd and 3rd grade.This special early learning effort is focused on improving literacy skills during a time many students experience a decline in their reading level.To support this important program,South San Francisco Public Library (Library)is providing one Site Coach for the Spruce Elementary School site.The Site Coach works with the principals,teachers,and facilitators to implement a cutting-edge curriculum intended to ignite youth to have self-confidence,explore,be creative,problem solve,and develop a love of learning.The work of the Site Coach also includes pre-program training on curriculum, program logistics and coaching. FISCAL IMPACT Funds will be used to amend the Library Department’s current FY 2022-2023 Operating Budget per Budget Amendment 23.055.Funds not expended in this fiscal year will be carried over into fiscal year 2022-2023. Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Strengthening of learning programs is an action item in the City’s Strategic Plan under Priority #2:Quality of Life.This funding will allow the Library to encourage and support reading and learning for local elementary school students enrolled in this summer’s Big Lift Inspiring Summers program. CONCLUSION Approval of the agreement will enable Library staff to participate in the BLIS program,providing an opportunity for SSF children to maintain academic and social skills during the summer break.It is recommended that the City Council authorize an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library and approve Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™216 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-218 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:11a. Resolution authorizing an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers program in South San Francisco and approving Budget Amendment 23.055 accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco (“City”)Library Department supports early childhood education; and WHEREAS,the Big Lift Inspiring Summers (BLIS)program reduces learning loss during summer break for kindergarten through third grade students; and WHEREAS,the Library Department will work in partnership with the San Mateo County Library to provide BLIS programming at Spruce Elementary and Los Cerritos Elementary schools; and WHEREAS,San Mateo County Library shall reimburse the Library for providing staffing to support the program in an amount not to exceed $15,000; and WHEREAS, receipt of these grant funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding; and WHEREAS,the foregoing funds will be used to amend the Library Department’s Fiscal Year (FY)2022-2023 Operating Budget. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City hereby authorizes an agreement between the San Mateo County Library and the South San Francisco Public Library to provide staffing for the Big Lift Inspiring Summers program in South San Francisco. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council approves Budget Amendment 23.055 to amend the Library Department’s FY 2022-2023 Operating Budget accepting up to $15,000 in reimbursement funding. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™217 File #:23-218 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:11a. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the documents necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution on behalf of the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™218 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-204 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:12. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project (project number pk1402),and amending the Parks and Recreation Department’s Operating Budget pursuant to budget amendment #23.054. (Greg Mediati, Director, Parks and Recreation Department) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League to be used toward the construction of the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION For many years,the baseball and softball fields at Orange Memorial Park served as a hub for the sports community in South San Francisco.The field had been regularly used for youth baseball,South San Francisco High School varsity baseball, and adult softball. In 2018,grant funding from Caltrans for the storm water capture project at Orange Memorial Park was approved,which necessitated that the field be razed and replaced after installation of the subsurface cistern and water treatment facility.This project provided an opportunity for the City to reimagine the future of the ballfield, which ultimately resulted in a preference for an all-weather synthetic athletic field. In 2020,the City Council awarded a contract to Verde Design Landscape Architects to develop construction documents for the project.Upon the completion of community outreach and design,a construction contract was awarded to Interstate Grading and Paving in early 2022.Construction began in June 2022.Currently the project is on budget and on schedule. A grand opening, pending further inclement weather, is anticipated this summer. The project consists of new synthetic fields,a pre-fabricated concessions building,sports field and pedestrian lighting,electrical improvements,fencing,safety netting,pedestrian paving,planting and irrigation improvements at Orange Memorial Park. Shortly after construction began in August 2022,the South San Francisco Police Activities League offered to donate $5,000 toward the project,honoring a years-old commitment to support improvements to Orange Memorial Park.The donation was subsequently approved by their board,and the donation was received by staff earlier this year. The generous donation is helping fund the replanting of three mature palms,which are now located on the corner of Memorial Drive and West Orange Avenue behind the Archie Fregosi Field backstop.One of these trees was relocated from within the park,while two were provided by the Town of Hillsborough where theyCity of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™219 File #:23-204 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:12. trees was relocated from within the park,while two were provided by the Town of Hillsborough where they were slated for removal for a storm drain replacement project.The Police Activities League’s donation will be recognized with a plaque placed beneath these three trees. FISCAL IMPACT Receipt of this donation has no impact to the City’s general fund and will be used to offset project costs. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Acceptance of this funding will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan under Priority #2 by helping to create high-quality parks and recreation facilities for residents to enjoy. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League to be used toward the construction of the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project. The Parks and Recreation Department appreciates contributions from individual community members and local organizations that help continue and enhance the Department’s mission to provide opportunities for physical, cultural and social well-being,protect and enhance the physical environment,and ensure the effective and efficient use of public facilities and open space. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™220 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-205 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:12a. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project (project number pk1402),and amending the Parks and Recreation Department’s Operating Budget pursuant to Budget Amendment #23.054. WHEREAS,for many years,the baseball and softball fields at Orange Memorial Park has served as a hub for the sports community in South San Francisco (City); and WHEREAS,in 2018,grant funding from Caltrans for the storm water capture project at Orange Memorial Park was approved,which necessitated that the field be razed and replaced after installation of the subsurface cistern and water treatment facility; and WHEREAS,this project provided an opportunity for the City to reimagine the future of the ballfield,which ultimately resulted in a preference for an all-weather synthetic athletic field; and WHEREAS,in 2020,the City Council awarded a contract to Verde Design Landscape Architects to develop construction documents for the project; and WHEREAS,upon the completion of community outreach and design,a construction contract was awarded to Interstate Grading and Paving in early 2022; and WHEREAS, construction began in June 2022, and is anticipated to be completed in summer 2023; and WHEREAS,the South San Francisco Police Activities League offered to donate $5,000 toward the project, honoring a years-old commitment to support improvements to Orange Memorial Park; and WHEREAS,the generous donation is helping fund the replanting of three mature palms,which are now located on the corner of Memorial Drive and West Orange Avenue behind the Archie Fregosi Field backstop; and WHEREAS,the foregoing donation will be used to amend the Operating Budget of the Parks and Recreation Department to support this project via Budget Amendment #23.054. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby accepts a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™221 File #:23-205 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:12a. accepts a $5,000 donation from the South San Francisco Police Activities League for the Orange Memorial Park Sports Field Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council approves Budget Amendment #23.054 to amend the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating Budget in the amount of $5,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the documents necessary to accept the donation and take any other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution on behalf of the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™222 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-172 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:13. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans. (Christopher Espiritu, Senior Transportation Planner) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America (SGA)to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In July 2022,Caltrans District 4 Staff approached the City of South San Francisco for support on their application to Smart Growth America’s Complete Streets Leadership Academies Program.The Program is a technical assistance and peer learning program with virtual and in-person workshops funded by a Cooperative Agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC)Division of Nutrition,Physical Activity, and Obesity. The Program is designed to help state DOTs and local communities work together to put Complete Streets into practice,engage in peer learning,and improve cross-jurisdictional coordination.Caltrans was selected to participate in the Program to work with the City of South San Francisco,and the cities of Berkeley and San Leandro.Together,Caltrans and the three local jurisdictions will learn about Complete Streets best practices and discuss policy and procedural barriers to Complete Streets at the state and local levels.Throughout the workshops,participants will collaborate to plan and install a “quick-build”temporary Complete Street demonstration project on state-owned roadways at each jurisdiction (SSF: SR 82 - El Camino Real). The City and its partners:Caltrans,SamTrans,San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA),San Mateo County Office of Education (SMCOE),Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC),and others,aim to obtain a better understanding of the challenges and potential for implementing Complete Streets concepts on South City streets.This Academy would be especially helpful in providing the City with tools for implementing Complete Streets projects on intra-city roadways,such as El Camino Real (SR 82)and replicate successful strategies for installation on local streets. As part of the grant, SGA requires each jurisdiction to: 1.Engage its partners/cohort to attend virtual workshops. 2.Engage its partners/cohort to attend the in-person workshop in San Leandro, California 3.Install a Complete Streets temporary demonstration project on a state-owned road through coordination City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™223 File #:23-172 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:13. 3.Install a Complete Streets temporary demonstration project on a state-owned road through coordination with Caltrans. This project shall be installed by Summer 2023. 4.Work with SGA to produce a case study about the participant city’s demonstration project and analyze its projected benefits; The grant award would support the City’s Complete Streets temporary demonstration project to be installed on El Camino Real between Orange Ave and Ponderosa Ave (SSF High School).This includes a temporary reconfiguration of the roadway to implement the following elements: - Protected bike lanes on both sides - Bus/bike lane at bus stop locations - Parking removal to accommodate the bike lane - 3-stage Bike turn at ECR/Ponderosa to demonstrate/facilitate safe bike movements across the intersection -No reduction in existing travel lanes but may need further discussion regarding a short bus/bike lane concept with Caltrans More specifically,the grant award would be used for the purchase of temporary materials for the demonstration project (i.e.,barriers,paint,temporary delineators)and other support needs including additional materials, supplies, or refreshments for a public event, or other expenses to make the project a success. FISCAL IMPACT Grant funds will be used to amend the Economic and Community Development Department’s current FY 22-23 Operating Budget per Budget Amendment #23.053.Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Grant funding to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Academy Program will provide an opportunity for the City to explore possible multi-modal safety improvements on a trial basis and collect information on challenges and advance the goals of the General Plan’s Mobility and Safety elements,and the City’s Active Transportation Plan (Active South City).The installation of temporary Complete Streets concepts is an action item in the City’s Strategic Plan under Priority #2: Quality of Life. CONCLUSION Receipt of these funds would support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy and would introduce a Complete Streets demonstration project on an important corridor for the City.It is recommended that the City Council accept $15,000 in grant funding and amend the Economic and Community Development Department’s FY 22-23 Operating Budget via Budget Amendment #23.053. Additional information can be located at this link: <https://smartgrowthamerica.org/2022-complete-streets-leadership-academies/> Attachments: City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™224 File #:23-172 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:13. 1)SGA Letter of Agreement 2)SGA SubGrant Guidance City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™225 1152 15th St. NW, Suite 450 www.smartgrowthamerica.org Washington, DC 20005 202-207-3355 Christopher Espiritu Senior Transportation Planner City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Ave South San Francisco, CA 94080 RE: California Complete Streets Leadership Academy Award Dear Christopher Espiritu: We are delighted to work with you as part of the cohort of three cities participating in the California Complete Streets Leadership Academy (Academy). The purpose of this letter is to formalize and establish the mutual commitments between Smart Growth America (SGA) and the City of South San Francisco (the Jurisdiction). The Academy is a technical assistance and peer learning program with virtual and in-person workshops funded by a Cooperative Agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. The program is designed to help state DOTs and local communities work together to put Complete Streets into practice, engage in peer learning, and improve cross-jurisdictional coordination. During the workshops, participants will learn about Complete Streets best practices and discuss policy and procedural barriers to Complete Streets at the state and local levels. Throughout the workshops, participants will collaborate to plan and install “quick-build” temporary Complete Streets demonstration projects on state highways The Jurisdiction and SGA agree to work together in a collaborative spirit and negotiate in good faith on all tasks and deliverables required for the Academy. Dedication of Resources SGA, through its Cooperative Agreement with CDC, shall cover the following monetary costs of the work to be performed during the Academy: 1.SGA staff and consultant efforts retained for the Academy. SGA shall not cover the cost of the Jurisdiction staff efforts. 2.Travel assistance to the Jurisdiction to send a cohort of up to 15 individuals to one in-person workshop in San Leandro, California. This assistance shall cover travel expenses (including mileage, gasoline, public transit, taxi, and a per diem for dinners based on federal guidance). SGA shall issue official travel reimbursement guidance, including a detailed breakdown of maximum reimbursement by expense type. It shall be the responsibility of individuals in the Jurisdiction’s cohort to make travel arrangements. In line with the travel reimbursement guidance provided by SGA, either the Jurisdiction or individuals within its cohort must provide 226 SGA with receipts for all expenses, completed W-9s, and completed ACH authorization forms for electronic payment in order to receive reimbursement. 3.Catering expenses for the in-person workshop in San Leandro, California. 4.Costs to transport the attendees of the in-person workshop to the location of the Jurisdiction’s project for a walking audit if needed using a shuttle, carpool or public transportation. 5.Two subawards to support the Jurisdiction’s Complete Streets demonstration project, for a total of up to $15,000. a.SGA shall provide up to $10,000 to the Jurisdiction on an expense reimbursement basis. Funds must be used for temporary materials for the Jurisdiction’s Complete Streets demonstration project. SGA shall issue detailed guidance on allowable expenses and the reimbursement process. The Jurisdiction shall submit an invoice to SGA with itemized expenses and receipts by July 31, 2023. b.SGA shall provide $5,000 to the jurisdiction to support other aspects of the demonstration project, whether additional materials, stipends for partners, supplies or refreshments for a public event, or other expenses to make the project a success. The Jurisdiction shall submit an invoice to SGA within two weeks post execution of the Letter of Agreement. The Jurisdiction shall provide the following resources and monetary support for the workshops and demonstration project: 1.Cover the monetary costs of Jurisdiction staff time to attend 30 hours of virtual and in-person workshops, convene additional planning sessions with the local cohort as needed, engage community members to solicit input about the project, and facilitate all other demonstration project planning activities. Roles and Responsibilities SGA shall: 1.Manage the Academy and be responsible for timely completion of all deliverables, including delivery of 30 hours of in-person and virtual workshops; 2.Serve as the fiscal agent for the Academy and be responsible for signing all contracts and handling all billing; 3.Complete a written case study on the Jurisdiction’s demonstration project; The Jurisdiction shall: 1.Engage its 15-person cohort to attend all virtual workshops. 2.Engage its cohort to attend the in-person workshop in San Leandro, California., distribute all travel reimbursement guidance provided by SGA to other members of the cohort, and 227 encourage cohort members to submit receipts for reimbursement in a timely manner using forms provided by SGA. SGA cannot reimburse expenses without receipts; 3.Complete a Complete Streets demonstration project on a state-owned road through coordination with the California Department of Transportation. This project shall be installed before the end of the final virtual workshop block on July 13th, 2023. The Jurisdiction shall work with SGA to produce a case study about their demonstration project and analyze its projected benefits; 4.Comply with all federal laws, including but not limited to the Required Disclosures for Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information Systems (FAPIIS):Consistent with 45 CFR 75.113, the Jurisdiction must disclose, in a timely manner in writing to SGA and the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG), all information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. Refer to the “California Complete Streets Leadership Academy Subaward guidance” document for further details. Modification and Termination These arrangements may be modified by mutual agreement of SGA and the Jurisdiction. This agreement may be terminated only by mutual agreement of the parties, or if funding is withdrawn by CDC, in which case SGA and the Jurisdiction shall make all reasonable efforts to find alternate funding sources and, failing that, complete the Academy to the extent possible using available resources. Signed on behalf of City of South San Francisco Name: __________________________________ Address: ________________________________ Email: __________________________________ Phone: _________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ Signed on behalf of Smart Growth America Name: __________________________________ Title: ____________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ 228 California Complete Streets Leadership Academy Subaward guidance SGA Associated Project #(s): CDC0 / 1203CDC004 / 107 SGA shall provide each participating Jurisdiction with subaward to support the Jurisdiction’s Complete Streets demonstration project, for a total of up to $15,000. ●Subaward 1:SGA shall provide up to $10,000 to the Jurisdiction on an expense reimbursement basis. Funds must be used for temporary materials for the Jurisdiction’s Complete Streets demonstration project. The Jurisdiction shall provide an invoice to SGA with itemized expenses and receipts. ●Subaward 2:SGA shall provide $5,000 to the jurisdiction to support other aspects of the demonstration project, whether additional materials, stipends for partners, supplies or refreshments for a public event, or other expenses to make the project a success. SGA shall provide this subaward to the Jurisdiction upon execution of this letter. Subaward 1: Detailed guidance ($10,000) Allowable expense guidelines ●Funds may be used for materials for temporary roadway safety installations, including but not limited to paint, reflective tape, rubber curbs, cones, and temporary signage, in accordance with California DOT requirements for allowable treatments in state right-of-way. Use of funds for these and other materials for temporary demonstration projects does not require advanced approval from SGA. ●All expenditures must have a clear relationship to the temporary demonstration project. SGA reserves the right to ask jurisdictions to submit explanations for purchases in writing if the relationship is not clear. ●Funds shall not be spent on permanent infrastructure, including but not limited to pouring concrete or anything included in a long-term maintenance plan. ●Funds may not be used to purchase food or beverages. Spending on alcohol is strictly prohibited. ●Funds may not be used to support staff time or to provide stipends for participation in the project planning process. Process 1.SGA will reimburse each jurisdiction for allowable expenses up to $10,000. 2.Team leads must submit an invoice using the form provided by SGA with attached receipts for all reimbursable expenses, as well as an ACH authorization form.SGA cannot reimburse expenses without itemized receipts. 229 3.SGA will provide payment electronically within two months after receiving the jurisdiction’s invoice. 4.All reimbursable expenses must be incurred before July 31, 2023. SGA strongly encourages jurisdictions to make and submit an invoice for all purchases before SGA’s fiscal year 2023 ends on June 30. The deadline to submit an invoice to SGA is July 31, 2023. Subaward 2 Detailed guidance ($5,000) Allowable expense guidelines ●These funds are flexible and may be used for any purpose identified by the jurisdiction to help facilitate a successful temporary demonstration project. Eligible uses of funds include but are not limited to temporary materials such as those listed above, equipment rental, supplies or refreshments for an event, or stipends for community members providing project input. ●All expenditures must have a clear relationship to the temporary demonstration project. SGA reserves the right to ask jurisdictions to submit an explanation in writing of how the funds were used and how they support the project goals. Process 1.SGA will provide a single lump sum payment of $5,000 upfront to each jurisdiction upon execution of each jurisdiction’s Letter of Agreement. To receive the payment, within two weeks of the execution of the Letter of Agreement, jurisdictions must submit an invoice to SGA, an ACH authorization form, and a W-9 using blank forms provided. 2.SGA will provide payment electronically within two month after receiving the jurisdiction’s invoice. 230 Agenda Item 13. 23-172 Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America to support the City's participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans. (Christopher Espiritu, Senior Transportation Planner) Legislation Text Att 1_SGA_SouthSanFrancisco_LOA Att 2_SGA_CA_Subgrant Guidance Anthony Montes at March 21, 2023 at 4:11pm PDT Support Dear South City Council and Staff, My name is Anthony Montes, and I'm a community organizer with the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition supporting a team of advocates in creating a South City that is safe and accessible for everyone – not just drivers. I am excited to hear that the city is receiving $15,000 from Smart Growth America to develop a temporary traffic facility on El Camino Real (ECR). As you may know, ECR is one of the deadliest roads in San Mateo County and accounts for nearly 20 percent of all bicycle and pedestrian fatalities in the county since 2019. More must be done to protect all road users. Leaders, professionals, and advocates across the county have developed plans and strategies in their respective cities, and together, through the Grand Boulevard Initiative. Yet, we have made little progress with respect to infrastructure improvements on ECR. South City has an opportunity to make a significant step forward and demonstrate to residents that prioritizing and protecting people that walk, bike, and roll on El Camino Real benefits each member of the community. To that end, we hope that you can leverage the dollars you receive to make a project that is: Bold in scope and fills gaps in the existing network: Residents can better experience the benefits of the facility when it connects them to vital points of interests or arterials that make multi-modal traveling more seamless. We recommend choosing an area that is prioritized in the Active South City Plan to make headway on meeting its goals, and tying this project to ongoing Safe Routes to School efforts/programming. Provides adequate protections for bicyclists: The facility should include bollards or other materials that provide a barrier between vehicles and users. Paint will not protect people and cannot offer the same comfort that a physical barrier can. Considering concrete is very expensive, we hope you can find cost-effective and creative solutions to provide some type of barrier. Developed with community members: Neighbors, business owners, community groups, schools, and other vital stakeholders need to be brought into the process. Our success lies in demonstrating to these constituencies that re- configuring ECR is a benefit to the whole community. The city should bring these folks in early and often through the duration of the planning. As a member of the city's cohort for the Smart Growth America workshop, I look forward to working with Chris Espiritu and his team to ensure this project can have the maximum impact. Thank you for your time. Best, Anthony Montes Community Organizer Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition 231 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-173 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:13a. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy with Caltrans and amending the Economic and Community Development Department’s Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating Budget via Budget Amendment #23.053. WHEREAS,Smart Growth America (SGA)has awarded the City $15,000 in grant funding to support the City’s participation in the Complete Streets Leadership Academy; and WHEREAS,SGA grant funding would support the City and Caltrans to implement a Complete Streets demonstration project on a state-owned roadway; and WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco (“City”)strategic plan goals include the improvement of quality of life under priority #2; and WHEREAS,grant funds will be used to purchase materials such as paint,temporary delineators,barriers, materials for public outreach events; and WHEREAS,staff recommends the acceptance of the grant funding in the amount of $15,000 from SGA to support the Complete Streets Leadership Academy; and WHEREAS,the grant funds will be used to amend Fiscal Year (FY)2022-2023 Operating Budget of the Economic and Community Development Department via Budget Amendment #23.053. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby accept $15,000 in grant funding from Smart Growth America. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve Budget Amendment #23.053 to amend the Economic and Community Development Department’s FY 2022-2023 Operating Budget in order to reflect an increase of $15,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a grant agreement with Smart Growth America in the form of a letter agreement as attached to the accompanying staff report,or in another form approved by the City Attorney,and to execute any other necessary documents on behalf of the City to carry out the intent of this resolution, subject to approval by the City Attorney. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™232 File #:23-173 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:13a. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™233 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-228 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14. Report regarding a resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency relating to major storm and flooding events.(Sharon Ranals, City Manager and Sky Woodruff, City Attorney) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency, initially proclaimed by the City Manager in her capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, relating to major storm and flooding events. BACKGROUND Government Code sections 8630 and 8634,contained within Article 14 of the California Emergency Services Act,empower the City Council and Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a “Local Emergency”when the City of South San Francisco (“City”)is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity. Under the Municipal Code,an “emergency”for the purpose of declaring a Local Emergency is defined as “the actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property” within South San Francisco,caused by conditions such as “air pollution,fire,flood,storm...”In such circumstances,the City Manager acting as the Director of Emergency Services is authorized to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a Local Emergency if the City Council is not in session,or to request the City Council to proclaim such a state of Local Emergency. On January 3,2023,the City Manager,in her capacity as the Director of Emergency Services,issued a proclamation proclaiming the existence of a Local Emergency due to major storm and flooding events.As shown by events leading up to that proclamation,South San Francisco has experienced unprecedented atmospheric river weather events,which resulted in storm,heavy rainfall and damaging winds that have continued throughout the weeks after.These severe weather conditions have resulted in flooding,mudslides, fallen trees,and related incidents.For instance,storm weather damages included flooding and closure of Highway 101 at Oyster Point in both directions (which has since been re-opened);water leaks and damages at various City facilities;and mudslides at Hillside Blvd.and the Sign Hill areas.The County of San Mateo and the City have both opened and been operating their respective Emergency Operations Center (EOC)in response to red/major storm advisories issued by the National Weather Service. In response to the major storm events,the City will need to take preventive and remedial actions,such as: establishing Temporary Evacuation Points;undertake streets,storm drain,and public facility repairs;debris clean-up;outreach and communication to the public regarding weather conditions and incidents;conduct damage assessments for facilities and locations impacted by storm,wind or flooding incidents;and staffing the EOC operations.The proclamation issued on January 3,2023 was intended to ensure the availability of mutual aid;the ability to enter into necessary contracts pursuant to the provisions and restrictions of California Public Contract Code Section 22050;and an effective response to potential injuries or property damage resulting from the major storm and flooding events or other related conditions thereto which would constitute “extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City”. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™234 File #:23-228 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14. On January 10,2023,the City Manager issued a second proclamation proclaiming the continued existence of a Local Emergency due to major storm and flooding events,which also reaffirmed the findings,bases and intents of the January 3,2023 proclamation.Since then,the conditions leading up to said Local Emergency proclamation continue to remain.Thus,it is recommended that the City Council ratify the City Manager’s proclamation of a Local Emergency. On January 11,2023,the City Council ratified the City Manager’s proclamation of local emergency via resolution.Once ratified,the Local Emergency will remain in effect until terminated by the City Council.In accordance with Government Code section 8630,the City Council will review the proclamation of local emergency within sixty (60)days from this ratification and would terminate the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.Additionally,consistent with Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(2), the City Council must review the emergency action related to contracting at every regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated, to determine, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the action. At this time,the circumstances present in South San Francisco continues to support the existence of a local emergency due to major storm events.The recent atmospheric storms on March 13 and 14,2023 continue to create additional emergency conditions requiring immediate City response and attention.The City continues to respond to various facility damages,taking preventive and remedial measures regarding current and anticipated impacts of severe storms,conducting damages assessment,and take other emergency actions.In addition,it is also necessary for the City to retain contractors for emergency work without going through the competitive bidding process where required.For instance,it was necessary for the contractors Teichert and Interstate Grading and Paving to clear debris and sediment,repair storm drain backflow protection systems,install surface draining improvements,procure sand bags and erosion protection materials for City and residents,and procure and install temporary restrooms at Oyster Point Marina.Such work occurred at various locations in the City including Rocca Ave and Park Ave near Sign Hill,South Airport Blvd,Utah Ave,De Nardi Way,and Shaw Road.Additional emergency work continues to be necessary.Pursuant to the local emergency and the authority under Public Contract Code section 22050,the commencement of such work has been and continue to be necessary to respond to emergency circumstances that have arisen due to said storm events. FISCAL IMPACT The declaration of a Local Emergency itself has no direct fiscal impact but would ensure the City’s ability to receive mutual aid,enter into necessary contracts,secure available federal,state and regional assistance funding, and able to appropriately direct resources in response to the local emergency. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN This action is related Priority Area 3.0,Public Safety,under the goal of disaster response and crisis communication. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency,initially proclaimed by the City Manager in her capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, relating to major storm and flooding events. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™235 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-229 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14a. Resolution continuing to declare and ratify the existence of a local emergency relating to major storm and flooding events. WHEREAS,Government Code sections 8630 and 8634,contained within Article 14 of the California Emergency Services Act,empower the City Council and Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a Local Emergency when the City of South San Francisco (“City”)is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity; and WHEREAS,Section 2.72.060 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code empowers the City Manager,in the City Manager’s capacity as the Director of Emergency Services,to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a Local Emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not in session, or to request the City Council to proclaim such a state of Local Emergency; and WHEREAS,South San Francisco Municipal Code section 2.72.060 (a)(1)provides that whenever a local emergency is proclaimed by the Director of Emergency Services,the City Council shall take action to ratify the proclamation within seven (7) days thereafter or the proclamation shall have no further force or effect; and WHEREAS,South San Francisco Municipal Code section 2.72.020 defines “emergency”for the purposes of proclaiming a Local Emergency as “the actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this city caused by such conditions as air pollution,fire,flood, storm,epidemic,riot,drought,sudden and severe energy shortage,plant or animal infestation or disease or earthquake,or other conditions,including conditions resulting from war or imminent threat of war,but other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy,which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services,personnel,equipment and facilities of this city,requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat”; and WHEREAS,on January 3,2023,the City Manager,in her capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, issued a proclamation proclaiming the existence of a Local Emergency due to major storm and flooding events; and WHEREAS, the proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services is based on the following findings: (1)That at the time of the proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services,the City Council is not in session. (2)That conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City caused by major storm and flooding events.Specifically,the City has experienced significant atmospheric river conditions including storm,heavy rainfall and damaging winds during the past few days,which weather conditions have resulted in severe flooding, City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™236 File #:23-229 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14a. during the past few days,which weather conditions have resulted in severe flooding, mudslides and related incidents.These incidents include:flooding and closure of Highway 101 at Oyster Point in both directions;flooded roadways in the City;water leaks and damages at various City facilities;over-powered pumps;downed trees;and mudslides at Hillside Blvd. and the Sign Hill areas.Based on information from the National Weather Service and the County of San Mateo (“County”)Emergency Operations Center (“EOC”),an upcoming Red/Major Storm is expected for the City in the next few days.Said storm will include additional heavy rain and significant damaging wind.The City and County are expected to or have already commenced EOC operations at the time of this proclamation.In response to the major storm event,the City will need to take preventive and remedial actions,such as: establishing Temporary Evacuation Points,undertake streets,storm drain,and public facility repairs;debris clean-up;outreach and communication to the public regarding weather conditions and incidents;conduct damage assessments for facilities and locations impacted by storm, wind or flooding incidents; and staffing the EOC operations. (3)That the aforesaid conditions of extreme peril warrant and necessitate the proclamation of a Local Emergency. WHEREAS,the proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services regarding the existence of a Local Emergency was issued on January 3,2023 with the intent to ensure the availability of mutual aid;the ability to enter into necessary contracts pursuant to the provisions and restrictions of California Public Contract Code Section 22050;and an effective response to potential injuries or property damage resulting from the major storm and flooding events or other related conditions thereto which would constitute “extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City” as described therein; and WHEREAS,on January 10,2023,the City Manager,in her capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, issued a proclamation proclaiming the continued existence of a Local Emergency due to major storm and flooding events, which proclamation is based on and reaffirmed the foregoing findings, bases and intent; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2023, the City Council ratified the City Manager’s proclamation of local emergency via resolution. Once ratified, the Local Emergency will remain in effect until terminated by the City Council. In accordance with Government Code section 8630, the City Council will review the proclamation of local emergency within sixty (60) days from this ratification and would terminate the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant. Additionally, consistent with Public Contract Code section 22050 (c)(2), the City Council must review the emergency action related to contracting at every regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated, to determine, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the action; and WHEREAS,since the ratification and declaration of the Local Emergency,South San Francisco has experienced additional severe storm events including heavy rain and significant damaging wind,which have resulted in additional severe flooding,mudslides and related incidents as described above,and the City is continuing to operate its Emergency Operations Center while collaborating with County and regional agencies on monitoring severe weather conditions,formulating responses,and assessing damages,and the recent atmospheric storms on March 13 and 14,2023 continue to create additional emergency conditions requiringCity of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™237 File #:23-229 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14a. atmospheric storms on March 13 and 14,2023 continue to create additional emergency conditions requiring immediate City response and attention; and WHEREAS,the circumstances present in South San Francisco continues to support the existence of a local emergency due to major storm events;for instance,the City continues to respond to various facility damages, taking preventive and remedial measures regarding current and anticipated impacts of severe storms, conducting damages assessment,and take other emergency actions;in addition,it is also necessary for the City to retain contractors for emergency work without going through the competitive bidding process where required; and WHEREAS,it was and has been necessary for contractors to undertake emergency work,including but not limited to:clear debris and sediment,repair storm drain backflow protection systems,install surface draining improvements,procure sand bags and erosion protection materials for City and residents,and procure and install temporary restrooms at various locations in the City including Oyster Point Marina,Rocca Ave and Park Ave near Sign Hill, South Airport Blvd, Utah Ave, De Nardi Way, and Shaw Road; and WHEREAS,as such conditions continue to remain and in the interest of public health and safety,as affected by the emergency caused by the major storm and flooding events,the City Council desires to continue declaring and ratifying the Local Emergency; and WHEREAS,based on substantial evidence set forth in this Resolution,the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco,do hereby declare and order the following: 1.The above recitals are true and correct and hereby declared to be findings of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, and incorporated herein by this reference. 2.The City Council hereby continues to declare and ratify a Local Emergency as described in this resolution due to major storm and flooding events.It is hereby confirmed that a Local Emergency continues to exist throughout the City of South San Francisco. 3.During the existence of said Local Emergency,the powers,functions and duties of the Director of Emergency Services shall be those prescribed by state law and the ordinances,resolutions,and approved plan of the City,as well as this resolution and any subsequent emergency orders of the City Council, in order to mitigate the effects of said Local Emergency. 4.Pursuant to the authorities set forth under California Public Contract Code Section 22050 et seq., the City Council continues to determine that the emergency work undertaken pursuant to and for the Local Emergency continues to be necessary to address the hazards and life-threatening situations resulting therefrom, and continues to authorize City staff to continue executing contracts for such work. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that this Local Emergency shall continue until it is terminated by proclamation of the City Council.Pursuant to Section 8630 of the Government Code,the City Council shall City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™238 File #:23-229 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:14a. proclaim the termination of a local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is directed to place an item on the City Council agenda for review at least ever sixty (60)days from the effective date of this Resolution to determine the need for continuing the Local Emergency pursuant to section 8630,Article 14,of the California Emergency Services Act.City staff is also directed,pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(2),to place an item on every regular City Council agenda to review the emergency action related to contracting until the action is terminated, to determine, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™239 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-231 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:15. Report regarding approval of a resolution providing a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans)Emission Zero:North Base Transformation project.(Christina Fernandez,Chief Sustainability Officer) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans)Emission Zero:North Base Transformation project. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City Manager and Chief Sustainability Officer met with SamTrans representatives regarding the Emission Zero:North Base Transformation Project to better understand the program scope,regulations,fleet performance,and potential impacts to the North Base fleet and maintenance yard,located off at 301 N.Access Road in South San Francisco.This project aligns with the City’s Climate Action Planning goals in seeking the purchase of additional zero emission vehicles with little to no impacts to existing uses at this site. The Emission Zero:North Base Transformation project demonstrates SamTrans’commitment to reducing the impacts of transportation on air quality and climate locally,regionally,and nationally.Additionally,the project accelerates SamTrans’compliance to transition its fleet to a 100%zero emissions fleet ahead of the state 2040 mandate.Funding from the Low or No Emission Grant Program and the Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Competitive Program will replace 95 diesel buses with 95 hydrogen fuel cell electric buses (FCEB)and construct a new hydrogen fueling station to enable the operation of the new zero emissions fleet.As SamTrans provides public transportation services to a 455 square-mile area with a population of approximately 771,410, implementation of Emission Zero:North Base Transformation project will have a significant impact in achieving major reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and combating climate change. Based on the presentation provided to City staff,staff is recommending Council provide a letter supporting SamTrans’ efforts to pursue grant funding for Low or No Emission grants. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Support of SamTrans Emission Zero:North Base Transformation project aligns with the City’s strategic planning goals of building and maintaining a sustainable city. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™240 File #:23-231 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:15. Attachments: 1.Draft letter of support 2.Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™241 Letterhead <DATE> Ms. Margaretta Veltri Low-No/Bus Grant Program Manager Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: SamTrans’s Submission to FTA’s FY 2023 Low or No Emission Grant Program and the Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Competitive Program Dear Ms. Veltri: On behalf of the <Organization>, I am writing to express my support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project submitted in response to the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Fiscal Year 2023 Low or No Emission Grant Program and the Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities competitive grant program. The Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project demonstrates SamTrans’ commitment to reducing the impacts of transportation on air quality and climate locally, regionally, and nationally. Additionally, the project accelerates SamTrans’ compliance to transition its fleet to a 100% zero emissions fleet ahead of the state 2040 mandate. Funding from the Low or No Emission Grant Program and the Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Competitive Program will replace 95 diesel buses with 95 hydrogen fuel cell electric buses (FCEB) and construct a new hydrogen fueling station to enable the operation of the new zero emissions fleet. As SamTrans provides public transportation services to a 455 square-mile area with a population of approximately 771,410, implementation of Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project will have a significant impact in achieving major reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and combating climate change. <Few sentences about supporting organization and why they are interested in/support this project>. SamTrans’ project is an exciting opportunity for our community and we look forward to the addition of 95 FCEBs and a large hydrogen refueling station to their operations. This project will accelerate the establishment of critical hydrogen infrastructure in the most economic and efficient way, support the roadmap to a national clean hydrogen network, and help us achieve our goals of major reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and combating climate change. Combined with the reduction of other emissions such as diesel particulate matter, this project will improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve. 242 Thank you in advance for your consideration of this project. I fully support SamTrans in their efforts and look forward to the implementation of this project and the benefits it will bring to our community. Sincerely, 243 Emission Zero Program South San Francisco City Council Meeting March 22, 2023 244 Topics: North Base ZEB Transition •Program Scope •Battery Electric Buse (BEBs) vs. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus (FCEBs) •Recommendation •Next Steps 2 245 Program Scope •California Air Resources Board Mandate (ICT Regulation) •Vehicle Replacement •New Infrastructure •Facility Modifications •Work Force Training 3 246 4 247 ICT Regulation •Instituted by California Air Resources Board (CARB) in 2018 •Requires transit providers to transition their fleets to zero emission technology (ZE) by 2040 •SamTrans developed ICT Plan to plan; goal to convert fleet by 2034 ahead of mandate 5 248 Vehicle Replacement •319 Fixed-Route Vehicles •40’ Buses •60’ Buses •70 Paratransit Vehicles 6 249 Facility Modifications •Electric System Upgrades •Maintenance Facility Modifications 7 250 Work Force Training 8 251 BEBs vs. FCEBs •Vehicle Performance •Infrastructure •Life Cycle Costs •Emissions •Resilience 9 252 Vehicle Performance Criteria BEBs FCEBs Range 180 -200 miles 260 -300 miles Charging/Fueling Time 4 to 6 hours 6 to 20 minutes 10 253 BEBs: Range Requirements 11 BEBs Type Number 40'114 60'21 Number of Miles Traveled per DayBuses Range: up to 200 miles Less than 200 miles Greater than 200 miles 97 buses 17 Buses 15 buses 6 Buses Options for routes that travel more than 200 miles per day, includes Route ECR (over 20% of SamTrans service): •Purchase 17 additional 40’ BEBs and 6 additional 60’ BEBs •Charge buses along the routes 254 FCEB: Range Requirements 12 FCEBs Type Number 40'114 60'21 Range: up to 300 miles Less than 300 miles 114 Buses 21 Buses Buses Number of Miles Traveled per Day No need to purchase additional buses to maintain the same service level. 255 BEB Infrastructure 13 256 FCEB Infrastructure 14 257 Facility Modifications for FCEBs 15 258 Infrastructure Schedule 16 *105 buses have reached their useful life Purchase 105 ZEBs*Deliver 105 ZEBs 2029 BEB Infrastructure: 5 - 6 years FCEB Infrastructure: 2.5 - 3.5 years 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 259 Life Cycle Costs: Assumptions •Revenue Fleet at North Base (NB) •12 Year Life Cycle •Reimagine SamTrans Service Level •Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars 17 260 Life Cycle Costs: Total Cost of Buses (NB) 18 BEB FCEB Variance Number*Cost Number Cost 40’ Bus 148 $169,542,050 131 $175,120,390 60’ Bus 37 $82,851,107 31 $71,887,784 Total 185 $252,393,157 162 $247,008,174 $5,384,983 * Additional BEBs are required for routes that exceed the 200 mile range of BEBs 261 Infrastructure Costs: BEB vs. FCEB 19 262 Life Cycle Costs: 12-Year Total (NB) 20 BEB FCEB Variance Buses $252,393,157 $247,008,174 $5,384,983 Infrastructure $144,950,000 $36,150,000 $108,800,000 Vehicle Maintenance $36,592,886 $42,106,882 ($5,513,996) Infrastructure Maintenance $3,900,000 $8,580,000 ($4,680,000) Total $437,836,043 $333,845,057 $103,990,987 263 21 Energy Costs: Electricity vs. Hydrogen 264 Life Cycle Costs: 12-Year Total + Energy (NB) 22 BEB FCEB Variance Buses $252,393,157 $247,008,174 $5,384,983 Infrastructure $144,950,000 $36,150,000 $108,800,000 Vehicle Maintenance $36,592,886 $42,106,882 ($5,513,996) Infrastructure Maintenance $3,900,000 $8,580,000 ($4,680,000) Total $437,836,043 $333,845,057 $103,990,987 Energy (electricity & H2)$41,096,703 $51,129,786 ($10,033,083) Total + Energy $478,932,746 $384,974,842 $93,957,904 265 Emissions (Tail Pipe) BEBs FCEBs Tail Pipe Emissions Zero Zero 23 * Depends on electricity source Diesel BEBs FCEBs 0%77% -100%*60% Green House Gas (GHG) Reduction 266 Resilience BEBs FCEBs Energy Source Single Source –Electric Grid Multiple Sources Infrastructure Fixed Can be relocated 24 267 Criteria BEBs FCEBs Range Fueling Time Infrastructure Maintenance Energy Costs GHG Reduction Resilience 25 268 •Bay Area Transit Agencies •BEBs: SF MTA •BEBs & FCEBs/FCEB Plans: AC Transit, VTA, Golden Gate •At least 19 Agencies have FCEBs/ FCEB Plans •AC Transit: 70% FCEBs –30% BEBs •Foothill Transit: 1 Facility for FCEBs, 1 Facility for BEBs •FCEBs: 157 by 2023; 1500 by 2031 •H2 Stations: 12 by 2023; 34 by 2031 26 Other Transit Agencies in CA 269 Recommendations •North Base (SSF) •South Base (San Carlos) •Progress and Timeline 27 270 Recommendation: North Base Replace North Base Diesel Fleet with FCEBs •Operational Flexibility: Range & Fueling Time •Infrastructure Cost & Schedule •Resilience •Experience of other transit agencies 28 271 Recommendation: South Base Decide in 2024 on type of zero emission bus for the rest of the South Base Fleet based on the following: •Actual experience with BEBs and FCEBs •Actual Costs of Electricity and Hydrogen •Actual Infrastructure Costs & Schedule •Additional Experience of Other Transit Agencies 29 272 Progress: FCEB Infrastructure –North Base •Completed Feasibility Studies •Conforms to Safety Standards •Updated and obtained requirements from SSF Fire Marshal –no major concerns •Temporary Hydrogen Fueling Station by Winter 2023 •Facility Modifications for 10 FCEBs by Spring 2024 30 273 31 Vehicle Procurement Timeline 274 32 Vehicle Procurement Timeline 275 Next Steps •Next Steps Review •Request: Support for Funding Applications 33 276 Next Steps Review •Seek outside funding for zero emission vehicles & infrastructure •Procure 105 FCEBs for North Base (NB) •Design & Construct Permanent Hydrogen Fueling Station at NB •Design & Construct Facility Modifications at NB •Decide in 2024 on ZEB for Rest of SB Fleet 34 277 Request: Support for Funding Applications SamTrans is requesting support from the City of South San Francisco for its Emission Zero plan to use when applying to multiple funding sources: •FTA Low-No Emission & Bus & Bus Facilities •Department of Energy’s Federal Hydrogen Hub •CTC Local Partnership Program (LPP) •Others as they arise 35 278 Questions? 36 279 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-235 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:15a. Resolution approving a letter of support for the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation Project WHEREAS, the Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project demonstrates SamTrans’ commitment to reducing the impacts of transportation on air quality and climate locally, regionally, and nationally; and WHEREAS, the project accelerates SamTrans’ compliance to transition its fleet to a 100% zero emissions fleet ahead of the state 2040 mandate; and WHEREAS, . Funding from the Low or No Emission Grant Program and the Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Competitive Program will replace 95 diesel buses with 95 hydrogen fuel cell electric buses (FCEB) and construct a new hydrogen fueling station to enable the operation of the new zero emissions fleet; and WHEREAS, implementation of Emission Zero: North Base Transformation project will have a significant impact in achieving major reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and combating climate change; and WHEREAS, the Emission Zero: North Base Transformation Project aligns with the City’s Climate Action Plan goals of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the Mayor is authorized to send a letter in support of the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Emission Zero: North Base Transformation Project as described in the accompanying staff report presented to the City Council on March 22, 2023. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™280 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-156 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:16. Report regarding an ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to change the regular time for the Planning Commission from 7:00 P.M.to 6:00 P.M.(Adena Friedman,Principal Planner and Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council waive reading and introduce an ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 (Planning Commission Meetings)of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to change the regular meeting time of the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Currently,the Municipal Code states that the Planning Commission meetings on the first and third Thursdays of the month, at 7:00 PM. The Planning Commission often has agendas containing multiple complex projects,each of which require significant time for presentations,public comment,and Commission questions and deliberation.Planning Commission meetings can often last for several hours,ending late at night.City Council meetings,and the majority of other City board and commission meetings start at 6:00 P.M.,if not earlier.At its February 18,2023 meeting,the Planning Commission discussed the merits of changing the regular meeting time from 7:00 PM to 6:00 P.M., and was supportive of this change. The draft meeting minutes are attached to this Staff Report. Beginning in March,2023,Planning Commission meetings will be held in a hybrid format,allowing members of the public to join in-person or remotely.Additionally,members of the public are able to submit comments via email, mail, and phone in advance of meetings, ensuring multiple methods for public comment. Changing the start time of the Planning Commission would require that the City Council amend Section 2.56.050 of the Municipal Code (Exhibit A to the Associated Ordinance). FISCAL IMPACT Amending the municipal code to change the start time of regular Planning Commission meetings will have no fiscal impact to the City. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN The proposed Municipal Code amendment helps achieve the following priority of the City’s Strategic Plan: Priority #6: Community Connections. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™281 File #:23-156 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:16. CONCLUSION The proposed change to the Municipal Code will allow the Planning Commission to hold regular meetings at a start time of 6:00 P.M.,rather than the current start time of 7:00 P.M.This change will be consistent with the 6:00 P.M.start time of City Council meetings,and will allow for longer agendas while minimizing meetings that go late into the evening.Staff recommends that the City Council waive reading and introduce an ordinance to amend Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. Attachment: 1.Planning Commission 2/18/2023 Draft Minutes Associated Files and Exhibits: 1. Draft Municipal Code Amendment Ordinance (Legistar File 23-157) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™282 February 16, 2023 Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES February 16, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TIME: 7:00 PM AGENDA REVIEW No changes. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda • Cynthia Marcopolis – Residents have raised awareness to save MSB as a multiuse historical building for the seniors of South San Francisco. • Tom Carney – Save MSB from the wrecking ball, 26% of South San Francisco’s population are senior citizens. The city needs to save this center, there is no other senior center in this city. Downtown is high in crime and there needs to be safer walkways and social locations. • Fionnola Villamejor – Save MSB building for the seniors in South San Francisco. Seniors have needs and the city needs to provide for them. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Consideration of draft minutes from the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Motion to approve Consent Calendar – Commissioner Shihadeh, Second – Vice Chair Faria, approved by roll call (4-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-02-16 7:00 PM (granicus.com) ADMINISTRATIVE ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS PRESENT: Chair Tzang, Vice Chair Faria Commissioners: Fernandez, Funes-Ozturk, Shihadeh ABSENT: Evans (Excused) STAFF PRESENT: Tony Rozzi - Chief Planner – Adena Friedman – Principal Planner – Kelsey Evans - Clerk 283 February 16, 2023 Minutes Page 2 of 3 2. Report regarding consideration of Design Review Board applications for a four-year term, in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (Adena Friedman, Principal Planner) • Commissioner Shihadeh – The DRB has all done a great job in the past years, agreed to reappoint all members • Vice Chair Faria – The DRB have done a great job over the years, in support to reassign all members Motion to vote: Vice Chair Faria, Second – Commissioner Funes-Ozturk, approved by roll call (5-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-02-16 7:00 PM (granicus.com) 3. Report regarding modification of Planning Commission meeting start time from 7:00 PM to 6:00 PM (Adena Friedman, Principal Planner and Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner) • Vice Chair Faria – Long agendas would be better if the start time was earlier, flexible but in support of an earlier start time. • Commissioner Fernandez – 6:00pm works; although March is his last month in Planning Commission. • Commissioner Shihadeh – In support of 6:00pm start time, other committees already start at 6:00pm. • Commissioner Funes-Ozturk – Prefers 7:00pm start time but will support whatever the committee decides, also would prefer remote meetings • Chair Tzang – Either start time works, but stressed that a 6:00pm start time should schedule any high-profile items later in the agenda so the public would be able to participate if running late to a Planning Commission meeting. No Action taken as this will be a City Council action only. Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-02-16 7:00 PM (granicus.com) ITEMS FROM STAFF • None. ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION • Chair Tzang – wanted to address the public comments on the MSB building, could not since it wasn’t on the Agenda as an item. • Commissioner Funes, Shihadeh & Vice Chair Faria – Congratulated Commissioner Fernandez on his second child. Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-02-16 7:00 PM (granicus.com) 284 February 16, 2023 Minutes Page 3 of 3 ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC • Tom Carney – Noted MSB was an item on a past Agenda but the commission would not respond to the public comments. The item went to City Council and again, they did not get a response then either. o Chief Planner Rozzi – Responded to Tom Carney, noted City Council would handle all public property discussions. Concerns for MSB building will be best addressed at a future City Council hearing, when appropriate. • Fionnola Villamejor - Thanked Chief Planner Rozzi for this guidance. Noted the public doesn’t feel as though their concerns are being addressed. Questioned the rezoning of this building, the public was not aware of this change nor the MSB building being on the chopping block. Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-02-16 7:00 PM (granicus.com) ADJOURNMENT Chair Tzang adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7:50PM. Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner, AICP Alex Tzang, Chairperson or Norm Faria, Vice Chairperson Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Commission City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco TR/tr 285 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-157 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:16a. Ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code,regarding the start time of Planning Commission meetings WHEREAS,Chapter 2.56 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (“Municipal Code”)establishes the South San Francisco Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”)and sets forth rules and regulations for its structure and operation; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has discussed the merits of changing the regular Planning Commission meetings start times from 7:00 PM to 6:00 PM, and is supportive of this change; and WHEREAS,starting in March,2023,Planning Commission meetings will be held in a hybrid format,allowing members of the public to attend in-person or remotely; and WHEREAS,members of the public have multiple methods to submit comments before and during Planning Commission meetings; and WHEREAS,Planning Division staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance to amend the Municipal Code, and to change the regular Planning Commission meetings from 7:00 PM to 6:00 PM. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Amendment The City Council hereby amends Section 2.56.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to read as follows (with text in strikeout indicated deletion and double-underlined text indicating addition).Sections that are not amended by this Ordinance are not included below, and shall remain in full force and effect. 2.56.050 Meetings. (a)The commission shall meet on the first and third Thursdays of each month at seven six p.m.in the community room,Municipal Services Building,33 Arroyo Drive,South San Francisco,California,except in case of necessity or emergency the chairperson or four commissioners may designate an alternate meeting place within the corporate limits of the city.Legal notice of an emergency meeting shall be given at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting.If a meeting is set for the regular meeting place of the commission,or duly noticed for an alternate meeting place,and because of necessity or emergency,the commission is required to meet in another place within the corporate limits of the city,then the secretary shall appear at the regular or alternate meeting place,whichever is the case,at the time set for the meeting,and publicly announce the new City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™286 File #:23-157 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:16a. alternate meeting place,whichever is the case,at the time set for the meeting,and publicly announce the new meeting place and post a notice of same on the door of the regular meeting place.Notices of all meetings, except regular meetings,shall be served on each commissioner and to each person who has requested notice in writing of such meetings,at least twenty-four hours prior to the time specified for the proposed meeting. Notices shall comply with Government Code Section 54950 et seq.,also referred to as the Ralph M.Brown Act. (b)If the day designated as a regular,adjourned regular,special or study meeting falls upon a legal holiday,the commission shall meet upon the next succeeding day which is not a holiday unless otherwise ordered by the commission. SECTION 2.Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional,the remainder of this Ordinance,including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect.To this end, provisions of this Ordinance are severable.The City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby declares that it would have passed each section,subsection,subdivision,paragraph,sentence,clause,or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections,subdivisions,paragraphs,sentences, clauses, or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable. SECTION 3.Publication and Effective Date. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933,a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney.At least five (5)days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted,the City Clerk shall (1)publish the Summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of this Ordinance.Within fifteen (15)days after the adoption of this Ordinance,the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. ***** Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco held the 22nd day of March, 2023. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™287 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. Report regarding an ordinance to amend Title 15 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to adopt a reach code for all-electric nonresidential new construction and enhanced electric vehicle charging infrastructure.(Christina Fernandez, Chief Sustainability Officer; Phillip Perry, Chief Building Official; Leila Silver, Integrative Designs 360) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council waive reading and introduce an ordinance amending the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code to 1)require newly constructed nonresidential buildings to be all-electric,with limited exceptions and 2)establish electric vehicle (EV)charging infrastructure requirements for new residential and non-residential construction that are more stringent than statewide standards. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City of South San Francisco (the City)is committed and uniquely positioned to become a regional climate leader and has taken the initiative to update its original 2014 Climate Action Plan (CAP)to align with new State regulations and targets to combat climate change.The City intends to remain a leader in sustainability by implementing policies, incentives,educational programs,and new technology that further decarbonization efforts.The CAP update sets targets to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 which aligns with the States targets and exceeds goals set by the original 2014 CAP. The CAP also outlines the City’s commitment to equitably mitigate and address the impacts of climate change,while realizing the co-benefits of climate mitigation actions that help create a sustainable community.In 2016,the City joined Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE),a public,locally controlled electricity provider,that provides the City with access to carbon free electricity generated 100% by renewable sources. As a strategy to support the CAP,on June 9,2021,City Council adopted the City’s first local building electrification reach code that required all new appliances in single-family and multi-family buildings to be electric (all-electric required). Additionally,new single-family and multi-family buildings were subject to increased electric vehicle (EV)charging requirements.The local amendments impacted residential projects that submitted for building permit under the 2019 code cycle and exempted all new nonresidential construction. In October 2022, City staff provided an update to Council on the additional outreach conducted to the local business and development community regarding building electrification and EV reach codes. During the study session, staff also presented the potential building electrification and EV reach code options available for local adoption under the 2022 building code cycle. Staff requested direction from Council on the preferred reach code options related to building electrification and EV charging stations for new construction. On March 16, 2023, staff also presented the proposed reach code policy during a Planning Commission meeting for feedback on the policy components and proposed exemptions. The comments from the meeting are highlighted in the discussion below. Per the direction of City Council,staff has included the following in the proposed ordinance amending 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen,Title 24,Part 6):1)all-electric requirements for all new nonresidential construction (with limited exemptions)and 2)enhanced EV charging infrastructure requirements for new single-family, multi-family,and nonresidential buildings using the PCE model code.Based on Council direction,staff focused the newly proposed reach code requirements on new construction only.Staff will return to Council at a later date to explore incentives, rebates, and potential reach code mandates for existing buildings. The staff presentation during the October 26,2022,study session provided an overview of recent national and statewide City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 8 powered by Legistar™288 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. The staff presentation during the October 26,2022,study session provided an overview of recent national and statewide developments impacting local jurisdictions’decisions to adopt reach code policies,as well as a background on California reach codes,the environmental,health,and economic benefits of electrification,and the different reach code policy options for new construction.Staff also shared an update on the additional feedback received from the business and development community during the second phase of the stakeholder engagement efforts conducted throughout 2022. The discussion below summarizes feedback given by the Council during the October 2022 study session,high-level findings from the additional stakeholder outreach,as well as the proposed all-electric and EV charging policy components that amend the 2022 CALGreen Code based on the PCE model code language. National and Regional Legislative Context Recent national and state legislation have shifted the role of governments in climate change mitigation and GHG emission reduction efforts.The State of California remains a national leader on climate action and continues to establish legislative and regulatory frameworks to support climate change driven policies.Key statewide elements to note include the following: ·SB 32 (2016)established a statewide greenhouse gas (GHG)emission reduction target of 40%below 1990 levels by 2030. ·EO B-55-18 (2018) set a target of statewide carbon neutrality by 2045. ·SB 100 (2018) requires that 100% of all electricity within the state to be carbon-free by 2040. ·EO N-29-20 (2020) requires the elimination of new, internal combustion passenger vehicles by 2035. ·CPUC Decision 19-01-011 (2022)eliminated subsidies that incentivize gas lines to new buildings starting July 1, 2023. ·CARB SIP Strategy (2022)sets zero-emission standard for space and water heaters by and bans the sale of gas heaters, furnaces, and water heaters by 2030. At the federal level,on August 16,2022,President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act dedicating significant funding to combat climate change.Example of the criteria within the Inflation Reduction Act include rebates and tax credits for efficient appliances and home upgrades,tax credits for rooftop solar systems,and tax credits for electric vehicles.It also invests in technologies like solar,wind,and clean hydrogen,with provisions that encourage domestic sourcing of materials.The law is projected to yield significant reductions to GHG emissions,with independent and official government projections agreeing it will reduce about one billion metric tons of annual emissions in 2030,with total annual emissions reaching about a 40 percent drop below 2005 levels in the year 2030. Reach Code Adoption Process The State of California adopts new building standards,organized in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations,also referred to the California Building Standards Code,every three years.The triennial timeframe is known as a code cycle, and the current code cycle (2022 code)went into effect on January 1,2023.Local jurisdictions may adopt local reach codes that go beyond the minimum state requirements by amending the CALGreen Code (Title 24,Part 11),Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6), or the municipal Health and Safety Code. Local amendments that mandate energy efficiency or conservation measures,such as a higher performance standard or battery storage,require California Energy Commission (CEC)approval,and must be supported by a cost-effectiveness study and filed as an amendment to the Energy Code (Title 24,Part 6).Local amendments that do not require efficiency or conservation,such as requiring electric-only construction or electric vehicle charging stations,can amend the CALGreen Code (Title 24,Part 11)and do not require CEC approval or cost-effectiveness analyses.However,cost- effectiveness analyses can demonstrate to the community that amendments to the code are financially responsible and do not represent an unreasonable burden to the residential and nonresidential building owners and occupants. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 8 powered by Legistar™289 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. Building Electrification Reach Codes Staff researched the opportunities and limitations of the potential reach code policy options that prioritize electric end uses over natural gas or require enhanced efficiency above the statewide Energy Code.The following options were presented to Council for consideration for a nonresidential reach code: ·OPTION 1 - Efficiency: All new construction exceeds minimum energy code (via Energy Code, Title 24, Part 6). ·OPTION 2 -All-Electric Preferred:Allows mixed-fuel buildings with high energy performance,requiring additional energy efficiency measures,battery storage,and/or pre-wiring for buildings to be electric-ready (via Energy Code, Title 24 Part 6). ·OPTION 3 - All-Electric Required: Appliances must be electric (via Green Building Code, Title 24 Part 11). ·OPTION 4 - All-Electric Municipal Ordinance: No gas hookup allowed (via municipal ordinance). ·OPTION 5-Electric Only Plus Efficiency:All new construction is electric only and exceeds minimum energy code (via Green Building Code, Title 24 Part 11 and Energy Code, Title 24 Part 6). Staff considered the benefits and challenges of each available adoption mechanism during the development process and shared these findings with Council during the October 2022 study session.Ultimately,the decision to proceed with the electric only amendment via the CALGreen Code (Option 3)provides the City with opportunity to establish electric only requirements for nonresidential new construction without triggering the CEC review process,which can add months to the enforcement timeline.The CALGreen amendment allows the City to file for approval directly with the Building Standards Commission (BSC)and provides the opportunity to house the electrification and EV charging requirements in one green building reach code ordinance (e.g.,one chapter of the municipal code).The City’s 2019 residential all-electric requirements adopted under the California Energy Code (Title 24,Part 6)carried over to the 2022 code cycle and was adopted by Council on December 14, 2022. The 2022 California Energy Code already requires solar PV,battery storage readiness electric-readiness provisions for new residential buildings and prescriptive solar PV and battery storage for new nonresidential buildings. Electric Vehicle Charging Reach Codes Residents are showing a significant interest in electric vehicles.The number of registered plug-in vehicles in San Mateo, Santa Clara,and Alameda counties increased 30%from 2019 to 2021.In that same time frame,the total number of registered gas combustion vehicles in these counties shrank by 4%.In San Mateo County,1 in 4 personal new vehicles purchases was an EV in 2021. It is widely known that availability of EV charging infrastructure is a critical component to EV adoption.Meanwhile,it is significantly more expensive to install charging infrastructure as a retrofit than it is during new construction.As such, ensuring that newly constructed residential and non-residential parking has ample EV charging capability will reduce long-term retrofit costs of EV infrastructure installation,while helping to increase EV adoption and decrease transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions. Council approved enhanced EV charging infrastructure requirements for new single-family and multi-family buildings during the 2019 code cycle.Staff presented the new 2022 EV reach code provisions for Council’s consideration during the previous study session.The proposed requirements are based on the PCE model EV reach code and enhances charging accessibility while meeting driver needs, minimizing costs, and allowing for limited exceptions. Electric Vehicle (EV) charging requirements in California can generally be broken into three categories: ·EV Charging Station:All supply equipment is installed at a parking space,such that an EV can charge without additional equipment. ·EV Ready:Parking space is provided with all power supply and associated outlet,such that a driver-provided City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 3 of 8 powered by Legistar™290 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. supply equipment can be plugged in, and a vehicle can charge. ·EV Capable:Conduit is installed to the parking space and building electrical panel and transformers have reserved capacity to serve future load.An electrician would be required to complete the circuit and/or increase the gauge of upstream wiring before charging is possible. EV charging capacity can be summarized as three categories: ·Level 1: Capable of charging at 110/120V,16A. This is equivalent to a standard home outlet. ·Level 2:Installation of a 208/240V,40A circuit or 208/240V,20A circuit for low power.This is the service capacity typically used for larger appliance loads in homes. ·Level 3 (DC Fast Charging):Capable of charging at 20-400kW.This is the type of charger used for Tesla Superchargers and DC Fast Chargers at some supermarkets. The 2022 California Green Building Code update (Title 24,Part 11)increased requirements for electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new construction; including: ·New one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses with attached private garages: must be Level 2 EV-capable. ·Multi-family dwellings: o 5% must be Level 2 EV Charging Stations o 25% must be Low Power Level 2 EV Ready, and o 10% of parking spaces must be Level 2 EV Capable. ·Non-residential: o 5% must have Level 2 EV Charging Stations, and o 15% of parking spaces must be Level 2 EV Capable. The proposed EV reach code requirements go above the State’s EV requirements for new construction. Community and Stakeholder Feedback Over the course of two years, staff conducted extensive community and stakeholder outreach to inform the policy direction and limited exemptions to incorporate into the proposed reach code policy. Detailed summaries of local stakeholder and business owner comments of building electrification and EV charging infrastructure can be referenced in Staff Report 21-791 <https://ci-ssf-ca.legistar.com/ViewReport.ashx? M=R&N=Text&GID=642&ID=4541299&GUID=3809DB88-404B-49BA-93B0- 9DFF65973861&Title=Legislation+Text> and Staff Report 22-718 <https://ci-ssf-ca.legistar.com/ViewReport.ashx? M=R&N=Text&GID=642&ID=5097976&GUID=78D4947E-108D-4C3E-AEAB- AE7F3FEF943F&Title=Legislation+Text>. As a result of the feedback from the business and development community, staff heard the following preferences for a potential all-electric and EV reach code policy: ·The first iteration of nonresidential all-electric codes should apply to new construction only. ·Provide a “grace period” or exception for projects that received entitlement prior to the ordinance effective date. ·Rollout requirements under the 2022 building code cycle (effective January 1, 2023). ·Validation of energy infrastructure and capacity due to grid reliability concerns,consider backup power exemptions. ·Remain business friendly to the biotech lab/medical/restaurant community via exemptions. Planning Commission Meeting and Public Comments During the Planning Commission meeting on March 16, 2023, staff presented the proposed all-electric policy components for nonresidential new construction and the proposed electric vehicle charging infrastructure requirements for all new residential and nonresidential construction. One of the main concerns brought up by the commissioners related to City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 4 of 8 powered by Legistar™291 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. extending exemptions for future or unknown tenant spaces in a new nonresidential buildings, as the needs of the future tenant space may not be known when the new nonresidential building (core and shell building) is constructed. During the public comment period, a few members of the community expressed the following feedback on the proposed reach code policy. One member of the community expressed support for the all-electric reach code requirements for nonresidential new construction. They also requested that the trigger be extended to impact qualifying alteration projects, similar to the current residential reach code policy. Staff evaluated the trigger for alterations during the policy development process and determined that a 50% alteration scenario is not likely to occur based on historical building permit data. The Building Department typically receives building permit applications for new nonresidential construction or tenant improvements (TIs). The member of the community also requested that staff remove the exemptions specific for labs, medical uses, and industrial processes. A member from the biotech community expressed the need for industry specific exemptions for laboratory and medical uses. The community member commented on the need for 24-hour power to support research and lab efforts for the biotech and medical community. They also expressed concern over power outages and the capacity of the grid to handle additional loads from all-electric new construction. The community member strongly advised the City to consider keeping the exemptions in the proposed policy or expanding on the exemptions for the biotech and medical occupancy types. One community member also showed favor for the exemptions related to life science and medical buildings. The community member mentioned that many biotech industries in the City rely on steam generated by gas to continue their operations. Due to the nature of the biotech development, the community member also suggested that the City allow for the gas infrastructure to be stubbed to the street, so a future connection could be made in the event that natural gas is needed for operations. Another community member who spoke at the Planning Commission meeting suggested that the City continue to support and protect the life science industry as it plays a big role in the local economy. The community member asked that staff consider ways to no undermine the biotech and medical sector by allowing for exemptions to these occupancy types. The community member also asked that staff continue conversations with the local biotech and life science community to continue to inform the reach code policy development efforts. Proposed Policy Components The proposed reach code ordinance requires all-electric new buildings and enhanced EV charging infrastructure via local amendment to the 2022 CALGreen Code and amends Title 15 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code.The proposed requirements would be triggered on building permit application for new construction.The policy components of the ordinance are described below.The proposed ordinance accompanying this staff report sets the Reach Code requirements in full detail. Policy Component #1: Building Electrification for Nonresidential New Construction The residential all-electric provisions carried over from the 2019 reach code will continue to impact all newly constructed residential buildings and alterations that include replacement or addition of over 50 percent of the existing foundation for purposes other than a repair or reinforcement as defined in California Existing Building Code Section 202;or where over 50 percent of the existing framing above the sill plate is removed or replaced for purposes other than repair.The main change is to the mechanism for adoption.The 2019 reach code amended the Energy Code (Title 24,Part 6).To align with the latest decision from the CEC regarding energy conservation and efficiency standards only require CEC approval,the previous requirements have been organized as an amendment to the CALGreen Code (Title 24, Part 11). Staff is proposing to remove the previous exemption for nonresidential buildings and include all-electric requirements for City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 5 of 8 powered by Legistar™292 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. Staff is proposing to remove the previous exemption for nonresidential buildings and include all-electric requirements for new nonresidential buildings.The 50/50 alterations rule will continue to impact residential buildings only.The ordinance recommends that newly constructed nonresidential buildings be designed and constructed as all-electric,with limited exemptions as described below. The proposed ordinance includes limited exemptions for buildings subject to the full electrification requirements.Staff presented potential reach code exemptions during the October 2022 study session based on previous development efforts and the additional stakeholder feedback received in 2022. The proposed ordinance includes the following exemptions. EXEMPTIONS: ·Specialized equipment for Industrial processes, laboratories, and medical uses. ·Commercial Food Heat-Processing Equipment. ·Back-up power for Critical Facilities necessary to protect public health or safety in the event of an electric grid outage. ·Nonresidential building projects that receive valid entitlements from the City of South San Francisco within six (6) months of the effective date of the proposed ordinance. ·If there is not an all-electric prescriptive pathway for a building under the state Energy Code,and the building is unable to achieve the Energy Code’s performance compliance pathway using commercially available technology and an approved calculation method, then the building official may grant a modification. It is common practice to include electric-readiness requirements for projects that receive approval to install combustion equipment (equipment or appliance that uses fuel gas).The proposed ordinance suggests language that requires electrical infrastructure and physical space to accommodate future installation of any electrical heating appliance that receives approval for an exemption by the Community Development Director or designee.The proposed ordinance also specifies when fuel gas infrastructure no longer serves one of the exemptions outlined above,that the fuel gas infrastructure must be capped (otherwise terminated or removed)by the entity previously entitled to the exception.The intent of this language is to ensure that the lifecycle for approved fuel gas infrastructure applies only to the end use associated with the approved building permit and is not utilized for other end uses in the future. Policy Component #2: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for New Construction The reach code ordinance also includes increased electric vehicle (EV)charging infrastructure requirements beyond 2022 CALGreen standards. To evaluate the financial impact on first costs,Peninsula Clean Energy commissioned an analysis of the total cost of implementing various EV infrastructure measures.Staff have worked closely with PCE to establish new construction EV requirements which are more in-line with local EV adoption trends,while providing flexibility for the builder and keeping construction costs as low as possible. The recommended requirements for EV infrastructure include: New Single-Family Dwelling: ·One dedicated EV ready Level 2 circuit, and ·One dedicated EV ready Level 1 circuit if there is a second parking space. New Multi-family Dwelling: ·15% of units with parking spaces, Level 2 EV Charging Stations. ·85% of units with parking spaces, Low Power Level 2 EV Ready. New Nonresidential Office Building: ·20 % of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Charging Stations installed. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 6 of 8 powered by Legistar™293 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. ·30% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Capable. New Hotel and Motel Building: ·5% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Charging Stations installed. ·25% of the parking spaces, Low Power Level 2 EV Ready. ·10% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Capable. Other New Nonresidential Building: ·10% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Charging Stations installed. ·10% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EV Capable. The proposed EV reach code provisions outline specific exemptions for new buildings.The exemptions are based on the current 2022 CALGreen Code exemptions for EV charging,the PCE EV Model Code,and Council direction during the previous study session.The exemptions extend to 1)when the local enforcing agency has determined EV charging infrastructure is not feasible (i.e.,utility unable to supply adequate power),2)Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU)without additional parking facilities and without electrical panel upgrade or new panel installation,3)multi-family residential R-2 building projects with approved entitlements within six (6)months of the effective date of the proposed ordinance,4)parking spaces accessible only by automated mechanical car parking systems are not required to comply with this code section and 5)nonresidential construction projects that receive valid entitlements within six (6)months of the proposed ordinance.The EV reach code requirements also align with the statewide code by allowing Automatic Load Management Systems (ALMS)to be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging. Incentives and Rebates to Support the Proposed Policy The largest concern about the reach code proposals was related to what the overall cost burden it may pose on the community.Councilmembers expressed concerns for community members that would be unable to afford the transition to electric appliances and emphasized the need to increase accessibility and availability of rebates and incentives.Staff acknowledged the cost burden differences between existing buildings and new construction during the development process.To alleviate concerns around cost-effectiveness and the current available workforce of contractors who specialize in electrification,the proposed ordinance focuses on new construction only.All-electric new construction is shown to be cost-effective in South San Francisco (climate zone 4)based on the Statewide Utility Program’s 2022 cost-effectiveness analyses.All-electric new construction is shown to be less expensive and cost beneficial for builders and developers compared to existing buildings. When considering building electrification, incentives are vital in supporting customers with the transition. PCE and BayREN have incentives and rebates that directly support the community. As part of the EV Ready program,Peninsula Clean Energy <https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/ev-ready/> offers free technical assistance for EV charging projects through its program partner, CLEAResult. For eligible properties, CLEAResult will provide project scope and design, helping to minimize cost and maximizing value. PCE also provides South San Francisco community members access to the Electrification Technical Assistance Program <https://allelectricdesign.org/> provides extensive free technical assistance to architects, builders, developers, design engineers, contractors, and energy consultants to learn about all-electric building technologies and electric vehicle infrastructure. Homeowners, multifamily property owners, and small and medium businesses can also access rebates through BayREN that provide direct financing for switching gas appliances to electric (i.e., replacing gas water heater with high-efficiency heat pump water heater). Staff will continue to collaborate with regional partners to provide incentives that support decarbonization and electrification to the South City community. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed Reach Codes would not have any fiscal impact to the City.The green building amendments parallel the structure and terms of the State code and as such any incremental plan check and inspection time should be minimal. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 7 of 8 powered by Legistar™294 File #:22-993 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17. This update meets the strategic plan goals of building, maintaining, and planning for a sustainable city. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council waive reading and introduce an ordinance amending the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code to 1)require newly constructed nonresidential buildings to be all-electric,with limited exceptions and 2)establish electric vehicle (EV)charging infrastructure requirements for new construction that are more stringent than statewide standards. Attachments 1.Cost Effectiveness Studies by the Statewide Utility Program <https://localenergycodes.com/content/resources> 2.2022 Adopted Reach Codes by Jurisdiction <https://localenergycodes.com/content/adopted-ordinances? mode=grab_page&attitude=print&view=adopted_ordinances> 3.Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 8 of 8 powered by Legistar™295 2022 Building Electrification & Electric Vehicle Reach Code City Council First Reading DATE: March 22, 2023 1296 Outline 1.Reach Code Background 2.Overview of Proposed Reach Code Requirements 1.Building Electrification for New Nonresidential Construction 2.Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for New Construction 3.Recommendation 2297 Reach Code Background 3298 Climate Action Initiatives 1.October 2022: Council passed an update to the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 2.CAP sets bold targets and strategies for reducing GHG emissions while increasing resilience. 3.Two main approaches to reduce emissions in buildings: electrification and improving energy efficiency. 4.Adopted first all-electric reach code and EV reach code for residential construction in 2021. 5.Joined Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) to give the community cleaner energy and renewable source options. 6.Committed to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, protecting community resources, and resiliency. 4299 Background 1.Statewide Code updated every three years. 2.New commercial requires Solar PV, Battery, and expanded EV infrastructure. 3.New residential requires electric-readiness and expanded EV infrastructure. 4.Reach Code is a voluntary code that “reaches” beyond baseline requirements 5.Reach codes could impact new construction and/or existing buildings. 6.Reach codes can amend the Energy Code, CALGreen Code or Health & Safety Code. 5300 Why Building Electrification? •Offers financial, health, and environmental benefits. •Better for indoor air quality •Electric appliances are more efficient than gas counterparts (saves money) •Electric appliances can be powered by clean energy (carbon-free/renewable) Financial Benefits Environmental Benefits Health Benefits 6301 Effective 30-Days After Second Reading Policy Development & Outreach Timeline January 27, 2021 Study session on potential residential reach code pathways and EV reach codes for 2019 code cycle. November 2, 2021 Study session to update council on outreach conducted to inform nonresidential new construction reach code policy 2021 2023 June 9, 2021 2019 residential reach code adopted by council, direction to conduct additional nonresidential outreach. October 26, 2022 January –Fall 2022 Additional outreach and surveys released to large developers and local business owners on potential reach code policies. March 16, 2023 Planning commission meeting to receive feedback on proposed policy and limited exemptions. Study session to update council on additional outreach and get direction on reach code pathway for nonres and 2022 EV reach code policy. 302 Stakeholder Engagement 8 Biotechnology/Life Sciences Town Hall Business Community Town Hall 1:1 Stakeholder Outreach Gas Dependence Survey Promotores survey from local business owners Commercial Reach Code Survey Planning Commission 303 What we heard… Life Sciences & Developers 1.Phase in requirements or include a grace period for entitled projects. 2.Include specific exemptions for commercial cooking, labs, industrial. 3.Concern over power outages and reliability of electric grid. 4.Lead time is critical due to PG&E requests to bring power to a new area taking up to two years. Local Business Owners 1.Majority of existing businesses rely on natural gas for ovens, stovetops, water heaters. 2.Hesitation to transition due to unfamiliarity with electric technology. 3.Increased EV requirements may increase parking demand. 4.Concerns about increasing panel capacity to meet EV requirements. 5.Willingness to transition if City provides incentives or rebates and C/E. 9304 How does that translate? 10 •Provide a runway or a long enough implementation period Provide •Apply to only new construction Apply •Take into consideration unique industry make up including life sciences and commercial kitchen needs Take •Consider back-up power for public health and safety in the event of outages Public Health & Safety •Consider technical infeasibility & discretion of building officials Consider 305 11 Jurisdiction Exemption Emeryville •Nonresidential: B, F, H, L occupancies. •Kitchens in places of public accommodation may apply for an exemption. •Hotels/motels with greater than 80 rooms for commercial clothes drying equipment. Daly City •ADUs/JADUs •Hotels/motels with greater than 80 rooms for commercial clothes drying equipment. •Nonresidential: Buildings containing kitchens. F, H, L occupancies and Scientific Laboratories are exempt San Bruno •Residential: Fan-type central furnaces, fireplaces, pool/spa heaters. •Nonresidential: cooking appliances for restaurants and food services. San Mateo •Laboratories or buildings with public kitchens requiring commercial food heat-processing equipment may apply for an exemption. Menlo Park •Residential: All buildings that are 3 stories or less may contain non- electric cooking appliances and fireplaces. •Nonresidential: Scientific laboratory buildings, emergency centers. For- profit kitchens may apply for an exemption for gas use. Granted exceptions must pre-wire for future electric appliances. Similar Neighboring Ordinances 306 Green Building Ordinance Proposed Requirements 12307 Types of Construction Impacted All-Electric Building 1.New Nonresidential Construction EV Charging Infrastructure 1.New One-and two-family dwellings and town-houses 2.New Multi-Family Dwellings 3.New Nonresidential Office Building 4.All Other New Nonresidential Buildings 5.New Hotels and Motels 13 Note: All-electric requirements for New Residential and qualifying alterations projects is amended under Ord. 1648-2022. 308 All-Electric New Construction 1.Newly constructed nonresidential buildings shall be designed and constructed as all-electric buildings. 2.Limited exceptions for new nonresidential projects. 14309 Proposed All-Electric Exemptions 1.Specialized equipment for Industrial processes, laboratories, and medical uses. 2.Commercial Food Heat-Processing Equipment. 3.Back-up power for Critical Facilities necessary to protect public health or safety in the event of an electric grid outage. 4.Nonresidential building projects with valid entitlements before the effective date of the ordinance. 5.If there is not an all-electric prescriptive pathway and the building is unable to achieve the Energy Code’s performance compliance pathway. 15310 EV Infrastructure: Terminology Source: Bay Area Reach Codes Initiative 16311 New Residential Construction: Single-family EV Charging 17 2019 CALGreen 2022 CALGreen Model Code Mandatory Mandatory Single Family Homes and Two-Family Townhomes (1) Level 2 EV Capable for one parking space per dwelling unit 2 EV spaces total: •1 Level 2 EV Ready circuit •1 Level 1 EV Ready circuit ELECTRIC VEHICLE OUTLET 312 New Residential Construction: Multi-family EV Charging 18313 New Nonresidential Construction: EV Charging 19314 Recommendation Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council waive reading and introduce a proposed ordinance amending the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code to: 1.Require newly constructed nonresidential buildings to be all- electric, with limited exceptions and; 2.Establish electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure requirements for new construction that are more stringent than statewide standards. 20315 Supplemental Slides 21316 EV Charging Exemptions for Residential 22 1.A determination of infeasibility by local enforcing agency. 2.When Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU) do not have additional parking or panel upgrade/installation included in the project’s scope of work. 3.Multi-family residential (R-2) building projects approved within six months of the effective date of the proposed ordinance are subject to CALGreen Mandatory requirements. 317 EV Charging Exemptions for Nonresidential 23 1.A determination of infeasibility by local enforcing agency. 2.Parking spaces accessible only by automated mechanical car parking systems. 3.Projects approved within six months of the effective date of the proposed ordinance are subject to the CALGreen Mandatory requirements only. 318 National & Statewide Context 1.EO 14008: President Biden called for “government-wide approach to climate change” 2.Inflation Reduction Act: Federal rebates and tax credits for decarbonization efforts 3.EO B-30-15: Gov. Brown issued to reduce emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 4.EO B-55-18: Gov. Brown set statewide goal for carbon neutrality by 2045 5.EO N -79-20: Gov. Newsom required 100% in-state sales of new passenger cars/trucks to be zero-emission by 2035 6.CA Climate Commitment: Gov. Newsom signed climate legislation and plan to invest $54 billion to fight climate change 7.SIP Strategy: CARB voted to ban sale of new gas furnaces + water heaters by 2030 8.CPUC Decision 19-01-011: CPUC voted to eliminate subsidies that incentivize gas lines to new buildings starting July 1, 2023 24319 2022 California Energy Code: Highlights New Residential •Heat pumps = prescriptive baseline •Residential: space heating or water heating •Performance credit for all-electric design •Pre-wiring required for gas appliances •Higher ventilation rate for gas stoves •Energy storage systems (ESS) ready New Nonresidential •Heat pumps = prescriptive baseline •Nonresidential: water and/or space heating for most building types •Performance credit for all-electric design •Solar PV prescriptive •Requirements based on building type •Battery Storage system prescriptive •Requirements based on building type 25320 Ordinance Pathways: New Construction Efficiency Electric- Preferred Electric Only Electric Only Electric Only Plus Efficiency Electric Only Natural Gas Moratorium Mechanism Energy Code Energy Code CALGreen Jurisdictional authority Jurisdictional authority or CALGreen plus Energy Code Requires All new construction exceeds minimum energy code Only mixed fuel buildings exceed minimum energy code All new construction is electric only No new gas infrastructure (Hookups or Piping) All new construction is electric only AND exceeds minimum Considerations Simplicity, preserves choice, specific measures Preserves choice, lower GHG savings Must be renewed Longest lasting Biggest impact, must be renewed 26321 Equipment Space Heating Water Heating Cooking Clothes Drying Source: BayAreaReachCodes.Org 27322 28 Property Category Property Type Port Type Port Incentive Applicable Cap Existing Multi-Unit Dwelling L1 outlet or L2 outlet $2,000 No cap L2 EVSE port $5,500 75% of costs, up to $90k Main panel upgrade $5,000 Up to $5,000 per property Affordable Housing Multi-Unit Dwelling L1 outlet or L2 outlet $2,500 No cap L2 EVSE port $5,500 Up to 100% of project cost, max $90k per property Main panel upgrade $5,000 Up to $5k per property Employee Parking L1 or L2 outlet $2,000 No cap L2 EVSE port $5,000 75% of cost, max $90k All publicly accessible non-residential locations L1 or L2 outlet $2000 No cap L2 EVSE port $5,000 75% of cost Any Make Ready circuit $2,000 Up to $20k per property New Market Rate Multi-Unit Dwelling (Above Code) L1 outlet or L2 outlet $1,000 No cap L2 EVSE port $2,000 Up to $40,000 Affordable Housing Multi-Unit Dwelling L1 outlet or L2 outlet $1,500 No cap L2 EVSE port $2,500 Up to $100,000 Public Agency L1 or L2 outlet $1,000 No cap L2 EVSE port $2,000 Up to $250k per property Source: Peninsula Clean Energy Incentives EV Charging Incentives 323 Each scenario is 0.3 – 0.5% of construction cost Assumes $392/ft2 to build per: Turner and Townsend, 2021 % of dwellings with access 100%40-60%100% $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 2019 Reach Code 2022 CALGreen 2022 Reach Code - with L1 Ready 2022 Reach Code - with low power L2 EV Infrastructure Cost for 100-Dwelling Multifamily Building L2 EV Capable L1 Ready Low Power L2 Ready L2 EVCS + Load Management L2 EVCS $170k $146 k $194 k $227 k 100%Affordable Housing new construction is eligible for PCE incentivesHigh Power Option Low Power Option 100% access is cost comparable 29 324 From:Audrina Lopez To:All Council Subject:The Students at SSF High School Support Reach Codes Date:Wednesday, March 22, 2023 1:45:46 PM [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Hello council, I live, and am a student in the South San Francisco. The climate is changing fast, and we need to enact change as soon as possible. Many others and I can surely say we have faced the direct results of a changing climate. Drastic fires that turned the sky orange and didn’t allow us to even go outside, and excessive amounts of rain, wind, and hail that made me afraid to leave my classroom. Not just this, but extreme weather patterns and natural disasters have devastated much of our country: extended extreme droughts, storms, heat waves, sea level rise, flooding-- have all already affected the Bay Area community. It is crucial that we drastically reduce our carbon emissions and decarbonize our economy, for the sake of our generation, and generations to come, as this problem is only getting worse. Delete Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 17 325 From:Audrina Lopez To:All Council Subject:The Students at SSF High School Support Reach Codes Date:Wednesday, March 22, 2023 1:40:32 PM [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Hello council, The climate is changing fast, and we need to enact change as soon as possible. Many others and I can surely say we have faced the direct results of a changing climate. Drastic fires that turned the sky orange and didn’t allow us to even go outside, and excessive amounts of rain, wind, and hail that made me afraid to leave my classroom. Not just this, but extreme weather patterns and natural disasters have devastated much of our country: extended extreme droughts, storms, heat waves, sea level rise, flooding-- have all already affected the Bay Area community. It is crucial that we drastically reduce our carbon emissions and decarbonize our economy, for the sake of our generation, and generations to come, as this problem is only getting worse. Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 17 326 From:Charity Fan To:All Council Subject:The Students at SSF High School Support Reach Codes Date:Wednesday, March 22, 2023 2:06:23 PM [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Dear Council, I live in SSF and attend SSF highschool. I support reach codes. It is critical that your generation does everything possible to undo the damage you have caused and continue to cause. My generation is inheriting the problems you have caused. Vote for reach codes for my children and your children and grandchildren. What will you say when your grandchildren ask you “why didn’t you do more?” Charity Fan Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 17 327 Hello Council, On behalf of the 25 SSF Earth Club members from the Citizens Climate Lobby Student Team in San Mateo County we are in full support of the reach codes tomorrow. Climate Change is REAL and We Need Bold Action Now- As students in SSFHS we are constantly moving around campus, going from class to class from 8:30am-3:20pm. We feel the effects of climate change. For example, today students were soaked in rain and winds were at an all time high. Students stayed in classrooms because of the strong winds pushing us back from going home. Some students even walk home in this poor weather crisis. The unnatural weather patterns and natural disasters have devastated students, and much of our country: extreme droughts, heat waves, sea level rise, flooding, unruly wind-- have all already damaged our Bay Area Community. Our generation as well as all future generations, depend on the change we can make now. We need to dramatically reduce our carbon emissions and decarbonize our economy. REACH Codes are an Issue of Equity- Our community is constantly affected by the growing brunt of the unpredictable climate change. Citizens of our country should be prioritized and the residents and marginalized communities should have and build a more sustainable future. There are the less fortunate in the world and in buildings today, we operate/pollute for the next 50=100 years, maybe more. With this in mind, it is much more cost-effective and efficient to require them to be electric now more than ever, and for them to convert many years down the line. South San Francisco Should be a Leader with Commercial REACH codes- Two years ago, SSF led the San Mateo county by passing one of the strongest and effective residential reach codes for new residential construction, unanimously. We CAN finish the job and include commercial buildings as well, for the benefit of our residents and students. Please listen to the voices of students trying to persevere our future generations. SSFHS Earth Club members Reply Forwa From:Kylie Situ To:All Council Subject:The Students at SSF High School Support Reach Codes Date:Tuesday, March 21, 2023 9:37:21 PM [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 17 328 From: Rick Moody Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 7:33 PM To: All at City Clerk's Office <All-CC@ssf.net> Subject: Reach Codes [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] I am writing to provide comment for the City of South San Francisco in your consideration of amendment of the Reach Codes for new commercial building construction. I live in San Mateo but my daughter and our grandchildren live in South San Francisco and my wife and I spend a great deal of time in South San Francisco. In San Mateo we've passed new Reach code regulations to cover new installation in all buildings, both residential and commercial. I have given public testimony about these issues on two occasions to the San Mateo City Council and I'm in regular contact with the government in my role as part of the San Mateo Climate Action Team. I would urge the Council in South San Francisco to take note of what many jurisdictions in the Bay Area have been doing in recent weeks: namely, strengthening codes to provide incentives for new installation or new buildings, both residential and commercial, to move toward electricity instead of fossil gas. This incremental approach was endorsed by us in San Mateo, and it's being adopted by many others both in California and around the country. Climate change requires that we rethink our energy use as a society, and the City of South San Francisco is in a position to exercise leadership here. I appreciate your willingness to consider this enlightened approach to public policy and I hope you will amend the Reach Codes in this way. Sincerely, Harry R. Moody San Mateo, CA 94403 Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 17 329 Agenda Item 17. 22-993 Report regarding an ordinance to amend Title 15 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to adopt a reach code for all-electric nonresidential new construction and enhanced electric vehicle charging infrastructure. (Christina Fernandez, Chief Sustainability Officer; Phillip Perry, Chief Building Official; Leila Silver, Integrative Designs 360) Legislation Text Attachment 4 - SSF Council First Reading_030823_v4.0 2 Public Comments • Roderick Bovee at March 21, 2023 at 9:58pm PDT Support Dear Mayor and Council Members, please vote for the staff recommendation to move our city towards all-electric construction. I believe this ordinance is badly needed, but could and should go farther. Please remove the "Specialized equipment" exemption for laboratories. As a chemist for almost a decade in my former career, I am unaware of any routine laboratory use of natural gas that can not be replaced with canister gas; if biotechs truly have a need for this that I am and the scientists I polled are unaware of, they can ask the city for the "all-electric prescriptive pathway" exemption. I also believe that if the city is going to require costly EV parking spaces, we should also require safe and accessible bicycle parking. This will cost a fraction of what EV parking does with greater carbon emission benefits and will take traffic off our roads to boot. Thanks for your time and consideration. • Guest User at March 21, 2023 at 9:25pm PDT Support Hi, I support the staff recommendation for all-electric nonresidential new construction and enhanced electric vehicle charging infrastructure. According to the Climate Action Plan, 330 nearly two-thirds of South San Francisco's greenhouse gas emissions come from transportation and non-residential natural gas. Two years ago, South San Francisco led the county by passing one of the strongest residential reach codes for new residential construction, unanimously. Let's finish the job by including commercial buildings as well. - Darryl Yip 331 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.22 “Green Building Code” of Title 15 “Buildings and Construction” of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to Adopt Local “Reach Codes” for Residential and Non-Residential Developments to Increase Building Efficiency and Increase Requirements Related to Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. WHEREAS,most recently in 2022,the City of South San Francisco (“City”)adopted by reference the 2022 California Building Standards Code,including the Green Building Standards Code and Building Efficiency Energy Standards,and as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission, pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 50020 et seq.; and WHEREAS,pursuant to sections 17922,17958,17958.5 and 17958.7 and 18941.5 of the Health and Safety Code,the City may make certain amendments to the California Building Standards Code,including provisions of the Green Building Standards Code and Building Efficiency Energy Standards,based upon express findings that such changes or modifications are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, the Green Building Standards Code is a part of the California Building Standards which improves public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices; and WHEREAS,on June 9,2021,the City Council adopted an ordinance amending Title 15 (Buildings and Construction)of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to adopt certain modifications and additions to the California Energy Code/Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the California Green Building Standards Code which serve as “Reach Codes”providing more stringent requirements than State codes and applicable to residential developments to increase building efficiency and increase requirements related to electric vehicle charging stations; and WHEREAS,in October 2022,the City Council conducted a study session during a public meeting regarding potential building electrification and electric vehicle Reach Codes applicable to non-residential construction and the additional outreach conducted to the local business and development community regarding such proposal, and considered various local adoption options presented by City staff; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the foregoing consideration and outreach, and because of the City's unique local climatic, geologic and topographic conditions, the City Council now desires to amend portions of the California Green Building Standards Code relating to all-electric buildings and electric vehicles, for residential and non-residential developments; and City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 19 powered by Legistar™332 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. WHEREAS,these proposed local amendments are to adopt a set of Reach Codes for residential and non -residential developments to better address local conditions,and establish energy standards that are more stringent than the statewide standards,based on express findings that such local amendments are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions as set forth in this ordinance; and WHEREAS,the proposed All-Electric Building Reach Code is intended to require buildings to achieve increased energy reductions and energy efficiency,and the proposed Electric Vehicle Reach Code is intended to ensure that new buildings can charge a greater number of electric vehicles beyond state code requirements and reduce greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS,based on the foregoing analyses and as described in the accompanying staff report,the City Council finds that local amendments to the California Green Building Standards Code contained in this ordinance are cost effective and will require buildings to be designed to consume no more energy than permitted by the California Energy Code; WHEREAS,the City Council finds that each of the amendments,additions and deletions to the California Green Building Standards Code contained in this ordinance are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions described in Section 1 below. NOW THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION I.Findings and Determinations 1. The foregoing Recitals and true and correct and are made a part of this ordinance. 2.The following local climatic,geologic and topographic conditions justify modifications to the California Energy Code/Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the California Green Building Standards Code. A.The City Council of the City of South San Francisco finds that in order to best protect the health,safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of South San Francisco,the standards of building within the City must conform to state law except where local climatic,geological,and topographic conditions warrant more restrictive regulations. B.Pursuant to Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7 (a)of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the governing body of the City of South San Francisco determines and finds that all the proposed modifications to the California Energy Code/Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the California Green Building Standards Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographic conditions as discussed below. I.Climatic:The City is located in Climate Zone 3 as established in the 2022 California Energy Code.Climate Zone 3 incorporates mostly coastal communities from Marin County to southern Monterey County including San Francisco.The City experiences precipitation averages 18.83 inches/year eighty percent (80%)falls during the months of November through April,and twenty percent (20%)from May through October.This is a dry period of at least five months each year. Humidity generally ranges from sixty two percent (62%)during daytime and eighty-six percent (86%)at night.It occasionally drops lower during the months of September through November. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 19 powered by Legistar™333 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. (86%)at night.It occasionally drops lower during the months of September through November. Temperatures have been recorded as high as 106 degrees Fahrenheit.Average summer highs are in the 70-73 degree range.Summer prevailing winds are from the North-West direction.However, winds are experienced from virtually every direction at one time or another.Velocities are generally in the 5-10 mph range,gusting to 23 mph,particularly during the summer months. Extreme winds,up to 50 mph,have been known to occur.These local climatic conditions affect the acceleration intensity,and size of fires in the community.Times of little or no rainfall,of low humidity and high temperatures create extremely hazardous conditions,particularly as they relate to wood shake and shingle roof fires and conflagrations.Climate change is causing historic draughts,devastating wildfires,torrential storms,extreme heat,property damage,and threats to human health and food supplies.The State of California has outlined specific steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to prevent these negative impacts of changing climate including moving the State to 100 percent clean energy by 2045.This gives local governments the opportunity to achieve greenhouse gas emission reductions with a climate-positive impact by powering buildings from clean electricity.These climatic conditions along with the greenhouse emissions generated from structures in both the residential and nonresidential sectors requires exceeding the energy standards for building construction established in the 2022 California Buildings Standards Code. The City Council also adopted a Climate Action Plan that has a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by the year 2045.In order to achieve and maintain this goal,the City needs to adopt policies and regulations that reduce the use of fossil fuels that contribute to climate change,such as natural gas in buildings,in new development.Human activities,such as burning natural gas to heat buildings, releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and causes an overall increase in global average temperature. This causes sea levels to rise, affecting the City’s shoreline and infrastructure. II.Geologic:The City of South San Francisco is subject to earthquake hazard caused by its proximity to San Andreas fault.This fault runs from Hollister,through the Santa Cruz Mountains, epicenter of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake,then on up the San Francisco Peninsula,then offshore at Daly City near Mussel Rock.This is the approximate location of the epicenter of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.The other fault is Hayward Fault.This fault is about 74 mi long,situated mainly along the western base of the hills on the east side of San Francisco Bay.Both of these faults are considered major Northern California earthquake faults which may experience rupture at any time.Thus,because the City is within a seismic area which includes these earthquake faults,the modifications and changes cited herein are designed to better limit property damage as a result of seismic activity and to establish criteria for repair of damaged properties following a local emergency. III.Topographic:The City of South San Francisco is made up of open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights and widths generally less than 30 feet,including flat open country, grasslands,hillsides and bay exposure.Significant elevation changes are also present in this setting;highly combustible dry grass,weeds and brush are common in the hilly and open space areas adjacent to built-up locations six to eight months of each year.When these areas experience wildland fires,they immediately threaten nearby buildings.This condition is especially significant in developed areas of the City that interface and intermix with adjoining open space such as Sign Hill.The threat of wildland fires could be compounded by above-ground electrical power transmission lines suspended on poles and towers exist throughout the City.Additionally,South San Francisco’s downtown and surrounding areas contain numerous historic and older buildings that are located very close together,which exacerbates the fire danger from dry conditions,wind, and shake/shingle roofs.The topography of the City also challenged by major development patterns,where major employment areas adjacent to major thoroughfares within the City have City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 3 of 19 powered by Legistar™334 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. patterns,where major employment areas adjacent to major thoroughfares within the City have created added traffic congestion thereby reducing the response time capabilities of the various fire agencies.The conditions within the City create hazardous conditions for which modifications to adopt stricter standards than prescribed in the California Green Building Standards Code and Energy Code are warranted. 3.Amendments to the California Building Standard Codes have been adopted in the past by the City Council based on specific findings of local geographic,topographic and climatic conditions;and the Council hereby reaffirms such findings and confirms that the facts on which such findings were based continue to exist. 4.The City Council finds that adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§21000 et seq.,“CEQA,”and 14 Cal.Code Reg.§§15000 et seq.,“CEQA Guidelines”)under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment,and in this case it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b) (3)).Adoption of the proposed ordinance would not be an activity with potential to cause significant effect on the environment because the proposed changes made to the California Green Building Standards Code and Energy Code herein are enacted to provide more protection to the environment,and do not directly facilitate new development, or changes in the type and intensity of land use. SECTION II.AMENDMENT OF CODE.Chapter 15.22 [Green Building Standards Code Code]is hereby repealed and a new Chapter 15.22 is hereby added to read as follows: A.Section 15.22.020 Amendments to the CALGreen Code. The California Green Building Code (Cal.Code Regs.Title 24,Part 11)is amended as follows,with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough.Chapter,section and table numbers used herein are those of the California Green Building Code.Sections and subsections not amended are not included below and shall remain in full force and effect. Section 202 DEFINITIONS … AFFORDABLE HOUSING.Residential buildings that entirely consist of units below market rate and whose rents or sales prices are governed by local agencies to be affordable based on area median income. … AUTOMATIC LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ALMS).A control system designed to manage load across one or more electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE),circuits,panels and to share electrical capacity and/or automatically manage power at each connection point.ALMS systems shall be designed to deliver no less than 3.3 kVa (208/240 volt,16-ampere)to each EV Capable,EV Ready or EVCS space served by the ALMS,and meet the requirements of California Electrical Code Article 625.The connected amperage to the building site for the EV charging infrastructure shall not be lower than the required connected amperage per California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24 Part 11. DIRECT CURRENT FAST CHARGING (DCFC).A parking space provided with electrical infrastructure City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 4 of 19 powered by Legistar™335 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. DIRECT CURRENT FAST CHARGING (DCFC).A parking space provided with electrical infrastructure that meets the following conditions: i.A minimum of 48 kVa (480 volt, 100-ampere) capacity wiring. ii.Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE)located within three (3)feet of the parking space providing a minimum capacity of 80-ampere. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION (EVCS).One or more electric vehicle charging spaces served by electric vehicle charger(s)or other charging equipment allowing charging of electric vehicles. Electric vehicle charging stations are not considered parking spaces.A parking space that includes installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE)at an EV Ready space.An EVCS space may be used to satisfy EV Ready space requirements.EVSE shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code,Article 625. ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)READY SPACE.[HCD]A vehicle space which is provided with a branch circuit;any necessary raceways,both underground and/or surface mounted;to accommodate EV charging, terminating in a receptacle or a charger. ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)CAPABLE SPACE.A vehicle space with electrical panel space and load capacity to support a branch circuit and necessary raceways,both underground and/or surface mounted,to support EV charging. ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE).The conductors,including the ungrounded, grounded and equipment grounding conductors and the electric vehicle connectors,attachment plugs,and all other fittings,devices,power outlets,or apparatus installed specifically for the purpose of transferring energy between the premises wiring and the electric vehicle. … LEVEL 2 ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE).[HCD]The 208/240 Volt 40-ampere branch circuit,and the electric vehicle charging connectors,attachment plugs,and all other fittings,devices, power outlets,or apparatus installed specifically for the purpose of transferring energy between the premises wiring and the electric vehicle. LEVEL 2 EV CAPABLE.A parking space provided with electrical infrastructure that meets the following requirements: i.Conduit that links a listed electrical panel with sufficient capacity to a junction box or receptacle located within three (3) feet of the parking space. ii.The conduit shall be designed to accommodate at least 8.3 kVa (208/240 volt,40-ampere)per parking space.Conduit shall have a minimum nominal trade size of 1 inch inside diameter and may be sized for multiple circuits as allowed by the California Electrical Code.Conduit shall be installed at a minimum in spaces that will be inaccessible after construction,either trenched underground or where penetrations to walls,floors,or other partitions would otherwise be required for future installation of branch circuits, and such additional elements deemed necessary by the Building Official.Construction documents shall indicate future completion of conduit from the panel to the parking space,via the installed inaccessible City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 5 of 19 powered by Legistar™336 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. conduit. iii.The electrical panel shall reserve a space for a 40-ampere overcurrent protective device space(s)for EV charging, labeled in the panel directory as “EV CAPABLE.” iv.Electrical load calculations shall demonstrate that the electrical panel service capacity and electrical system,including any on-site distribution transformer(s),have sufficient capacity to simultaneously charge all EVs at all required EV spaces at a minimum of 40 amperes. v.The parking space shall contain signage with at least a 12”font adjacent to the parking space indicating the space is EV Capable. LEVEL 1 EV READY.A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements: i.A minimum of 2.2 kVa (110/120 volt, 20-ampere) capacity wiring. ii.A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet”or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3)feet of the parking space.If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 16- ampere. iii.Conduit oversized to accommodate future Level 2 EV Ready (208/240 volt,40-ampere)at each parking space. LEVEL 2 EV READY.A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements: i.A minimum of 8.3 kVa (208/240 volt, 40-ampere) capacity wiring. ii.A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet”or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3)feet of the parking space.If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 30- ampere. … LOW POWER LEVEL 2 EV READY.A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements: i.A minimum of 4.1 kVA (208/240 Volt, 20-ampere) capacity wiring. ii.A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet”or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3)feet of the parking space.If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 16- ampere. iii.Conduit oversized to accommodate future Level 2 EV Ready (208/240 volt,40-ampere)at each parking space. LOW POWER LEVEL 2 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)CHARGING RECEPTACLE.[HCD]A 208/240 Volt 20-ampere minimum branch circuit and a receptacle for use by an EV driver to charge their electric vehicle or hybrid electric vehicle. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 6 of 19 powered by Legistar™337 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES.[BSC-CG,DSA-SS]An area,other than a public street,public way,or other property (and exclusive of off-street parking spaces),permanently reserved or set aside for the loading or unloading of motor vehicles,including ways of ingress and egress and maneuvering areas.Whenever the term "loading space"is used,it shall,unless the context clearly requires otherwise,be construed as meaning off- street loading space. This excludes designated passenger loading/unloading. CHAPTER 3 GREEN BUILDING SECTION 301 GENERAL 301.1 Scope. . . . 301.1.1 Additions and alterations. [HCD]The mandatory provisions of Chapter 4 shall be applied to additions or alterations of existing residential buildings where the addition or alteration increases the building’s conditioned area,volume,or size.The requirements shall apply only to and/or within the specific area of the addition or alteration.(No change to existing California amendment.) The mandatory provisions of Section 4.106.4.2 may apply to additions or alterations of existing parking facilities or the addition of new parking facilities serving existing multifamily buildings.See Section 4.106.4.3 for application. NOTE:Repairs including,but not limited to,resurfacing,restriping,and repairing or maintaining existing lighting fixtures are not considered alterations for the purpose of this section. CHAPTER 4 RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES DIVISION 4.1, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION 4.106 SITE DEVELOPMENT 4.106.4 Electric vehicle (EV)charging for new construction.Residential construction shall comply with Section 4.106.4.1 or 4.106.4.2,and 4.106.4.3,to facilitate future installation and use of EV chargers.Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE)shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code,Article 625.For EVCS signs,refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings)or its successor(s).Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. Exceptions: 1.On a case-by-case basis,where the local enforcing agency has determined EV charging and infrastructure are not feasible based upon one or more of the following conditions: 1.Where there is no local utility power supply or the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. 2.Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcing agency substantiating that additional City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 7 of 19 powered by Legistar™338 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. 2.Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcing agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements,directly related to the implementation of Section 4.106.4,may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space for market rate housing or $400 per parking space for affordable housing.EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.Adversely impact the construction cost of the project. 2.Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU)without additional parking facilities and without electrical panel upgrade or new panel installation.Detached ADUs, attached ADUs,and JADUs without additional parking but with electrical panel upgrades or new panels must have reserved breakers and electrical capacity according to the requirements of 4.106.4.1 . 3.Multifamily residential R-2 building projects that receive valid entitlements from the City of South San Francisco within six (6)months of the effective date of the enabling ordinance shall provide,based on the total number of parking spaces,at least five percent (5%)with EVCS Level 2 EV Ready,twenty- five percent (25%)with Low Power Level 2 EV Ready,and ten percent (10%)with Level 2 EV Capable according to 2022 California Green Building Standards Code requirements. 4.106.4.1 New One- and two-family dwellings and town-houses with private garages. 4.106.4.1.1 New Construction.One parking space provided shall be a Level 2 EV Ready space.If a second parking space is provided,it shall be provided with a Level 1 EV Ready space.For each dwelling unit, install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208-240-volt branch circuit.The raceway shall not be less than trade size 1 (nominal 1-inch inside diameter).The raceway shall originate at the main service or subpanel and shall terminate into a listed cabinet,box or other enclosure in close proximity to the proposed location of an EV charger.Raceways are required to be continuous at enclosed,inaccessible or concealed areas and spaces. The service panel and/or subpanel shall provide capacity to install a 40-ampere 208/240-volt minimum dedicated branch circuit and space(s)reserved to permit installation of a branch circuit overcurrent protective device. Exception:A raceway is not required if a minimum 40-ampere 208/240-volt dedicated EV branch circuit is installed in close proximity to the proposed location of an EV charger at the time of original construction in accordance with the California Electrical Code. 4.106.4.1.1 Identification.The service panel or subpanel circuit directory shall identify the overcurrent protective device space(s)reserved for future EV charging as “EV CAPABLE”.The raceway termination location shall be permanently and visibly marked as “EV CAPABLE”. … 4.106.4.2 New Multifamily dwellings,hotels and motels and with new residential parking facilities. Requirements apply to parking spaces that are assigned or leased to individual dwelling units,as well as unassigned residential parking. Visitor or common area parking is not included. 4.106.4.2.1 New Construction.Fifteen percent (15%)of dwelling units with parking spaces shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready.ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging.Eighty- five percent (85%)of dwelling units with parking spaces shall be provided with a Low Power Level 2 EV Ready space.EV ready spaces and EVCS in multifamily developments shall comply with California Building Code,Chapter 11A,Section 1109A.EVCS shall comply with the accessibility provisions for EV chargers in the California Building Code, Chapter 11B. Note:The total number of EV spaces should be one-hundred percent (100%)of dwelling units or one-hundred City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 8 of 19 powered by Legistar™339 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. percent (100%) of parking spaces, whichever is less. When parking is provided,parking spaces for new multifamily dwellings,hotels and motels shall meet the requirements of Sections 4.106.4.2.1 and 4.106.4.2.2.Calculations for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number.A parking space served by electric vehicle supply equipment or designed as a future EV charging space shall count as at least one standard automobile parking space only for the purpose of complying with any applicable minimum parking space requirements established by a local jurisdiction.See Vehicle Code Section 22511.2 for further details. 4.106.4.2.1 Multifamily development projects with less than 20 dwelling units;and hotels and motels with less than 20 sleeping units or guest rooms. The number of dwelling units,sleeping units or guest rooms shall be based on all buildings on a project site subject to this section. 1.EV Capable.Ten (10)percent of the total number of parking spaces on a building site,provided for all types of parking facilities,shall be electric vehicle charging spaces (EV spaces)capable of supporting future Level 2 EVSE.Electrical load calculations shall demonstrate that the electrical panel service capacity and electrical system,including any on-site distribution transformer(s),have sufficient capacity to simultaneously charge all EVs at all required EV spaces at a minimum of 40 amperes. The service panel or subpanel circuit directory shall identify the overcurrent protective device space(s)reserved for future EV charging purposes as “EV CAPABLE” in accordance with the California Electrical Code. Exceptions: 1.When EV chargers (Level 2 EVSE)are installed in a number equal to or greater than the required number of EV capable spaces. 2.When EV chargers (Level 2 EVSE)are installed in a number less than the required number of EV capable spaces,the number of EV capable spaces required may be reduced by a number equal to the number of EV chargers installed. Notes: a.Construction documents are intended to demonstrate the project’s capability and capacity for facilitating future EV charging. b.There is no requirement for EV spaces to be constructed or available until receptacles for EV charging or EV chargers are installed for use. 2.EV Ready.Twenty-five (25)percent of the total number of parking spaces shall be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles.For multifamily parking facilities,no more than one receptacle is required per dwelling unit when more than one parking space is provided for use by a single dwelling unit. Exception: Areas of parking facilities served by parking lifts. 4.106.4.2.2 Multifamily development projects with 20 or more dwelling units,hotels and motels with 20 or more sleeping units or guest rooms. The number of dwelling units,sleeping units or guest rooms shall be based on all buildings on a project site subject to this section. 1.EV Capable.Ten (10)percent of the total number of parking spaces on a building site,provided for all types of parking facilities,shall be electric vehicle charging spaces (EV spaces)capable of supporting future Level 2 EVSE.Electrical load calculations shall demonstrate that the electrical panel service capacity and electrical system,including any on-site distribution transformer(s),have sufficient capacity City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 9 of 19 powered by Legistar™340 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. to simultaneously charge all EVs at all required EV spaces at a minimum of 40 amperes. The service panel or subpanel circuit directory shall identify the overcurrent protective device space(s)reserved for future EV charging purposes as “EV CAPABLE” in accordance with the California Electrical Code. Exception:When EV chargers (Level 2 EVSE)are installed in a number greater than five (5)percent of parking spaces required by Section 4.106.4.2.2,Item 3,the number of EV capable spaces required may be reduced by a number equal to the number of EV chargers installed over the five (5) percent required. Notes: a.Construction documents shall show locations of future EV spaces. b.There is no requirement for EV spaces to be constructed or available until receptacles for EV charging or EV chargers are installed for use. 2.EV Ready.Twenty-five (25)percent of the total number of parking spaces shall be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles.For multifamily parking facilities,no more than one receptacle is required per dwelling unit when more than one parking space is provided for use by a single dwelling unit. Exception:Areas of parking facilities served by parking lifts. 3.EV Chargers.Five (5)percent of the total number of parking spaces shall be equipped with Level 2 EVSE.Where common use parking is provided,at least one EV charger shall be located in the common use parking area and shall be available for use by all residents or guests. When low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles or Level 2 EVSE are installed beyond the minimum required,an automatic load management system (ALMS)may be used to reduce the maximum required electrical capacity to each space served by the ALMS.The electrical system and any on-site distribution transformers shall have sufficient capacity to deliver at least 3.3 kW simultaneously to each EV charging station (EVCS)served by the ALMS.The branch circuit shall have a minimum capacity of 40 amperes and installed EVSE shall have a capacity of not less than 30 amperes.ALMS shall not be used to reduce the minimum required electrical capacity to the required EV capable spaces. 4.106.4.32.2.1 Electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS). Electric vehicle charging stations required by Section 4.106.4.2.2,Item 3,shall comply with Section 4.106.4.3 2.2.1. Exception:Electric vehicle charging stations serving public accommodations,public housing,motels,and hotels shall not be required to comply with this section.See California Building Code,Chapter 11B,for applicable requirements. 4.106.4.3.12.2.1.1 Location. EVCS shall comply with at least one of the following options: 1.The charging space shall be located adjacent to an accessible parking space meeting the requirements of the California Building Code,Chapter 11A,to allow use of the EV charger from the accessible parking space. 2.The charging space shall be located on an accessible route,as defined in the California Building Code, Chapter 2, to the building. Exception:Electric vehicle charging stations designed and constructed in compliance with the California Building Code,Chapter 11B,are not required to comply with Section 4.106.4.3.12.2.1.1 and Section 4.106.4. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 10 of 19 powered by Legistar™341 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. 3.22.2.1.2, Item 3. 4.106.4.3.22.2.1.2 Electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS)Dimensions. The charging spaces shall be designed to comply with the following: 1.The minimum length of each EV space shall be 18 feet (5486 mm). 2.The minimum width of each EV space shall be 9 feet (2743 mm). 3.One in every 25 charging spaces,but not less than one,shall also have an 8-foot (2438 mm)wide minimum aisle.A 5-foot (1524 mm)wide minimum aisle shall be permitted provided the minimum width of the EV space is 12 feet (3658 mm). a.Surface slope for this EV space and the aisle shall not exceed 1 unit vertical in 48 units horizontal (2.083 percent slope) in any direction. Exception:Where the City’s Municipal or Zoning Code permits parking space dimensions that are less than the minimum requirements stated in this section 4.106.4.3.2,and the compliance with which would be infeasible due to particular circumstances of a project,an exception may be granted while remaining in compliance with California Building Code Section Table 11B-228.3.2.1 and 11B-812, as applicable. 4.106.4.2.2.1.3 Accessible EV spaces.In addition to the requirements in Sections 4.106.4.2.2.1.1 and 4.106.4.2.2.1.2,all EVSE,when installed,shall comply with the accessibility provisions for EV chargers in the California Building Code,Chapter 11B.EV ready spaces and EVCS in multifamily developments shall comply with California Building Code, Chapter 11A, Section 1109A. 4.106.4.4 Direct current fast charging stations.One DCFC may be substituted for up to five (5)EVCS to meet the requirements of 4.106.4.1 and 4.106.4.2.Where ALMS serve DCFC stations,the power demand from the DCFC shall be prioritized above Level 1 and Level 2 spaces. 4.106.4.2.3 EV space requirements. 1.Single EV space required.Install a listed raceway capable of accommodating a 208/240-volt dedicated branch circuit.The raceway shall not be less than trade size 1 (nominal 1-inch inside diameter).The raceway shall originate at the main service or subpanel and shall terminate into a listed cabinet,box or enclosure in close proximity to the location or the proposed location of the EV space.Construction documents shall identify the raceway termination point,receptacle or charger location,as applicable. The service panel and/or subpanel shall have a 40-ampere minimum dedicated branch circuit,including branch circuit overcurrent protective device installed,or space(s)reserved to permit installation of a branch circuit overcurrent protective device. Exception:A raceway is not required if a minimum 40-ampere 208/240-volt dedicated EV branch circuit is installed in close proximity to the location or the proposed location of the EV space,at the time of original construction in accordance with the California Electrical Code. 2.Multiple EV spaces required.Construction documents shall indicate the raceway termination point and the location of installed or future EV spaces,receptacles,or EV chargers.Construction documents shall also provide information on amperage of installed or future receptacles or EVSE,raceway method (s),wiring schematics and electrical load calculations.Plan design shall be based upon a 40-ampere minimum branch circuit.Required raceways and related components that are planned to be installed underground,enclosed,inaccessible or in concealed areas and spaces shall be installed at the time of City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 11 of 19 powered by Legistar™342 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. original construction. Exception:A raceway is not required if a minimum 40-ampere 208/240-volt dedicated EV branch circuit is installed in close proximity to the location or the proposed location of the EV space at the time of original construction in accordance with the California Electrical Code. 4.106.4.2.4 Identification. The service panel or subpanel circuit directory shall identify the overcurrent protective device space(s)reserved for future EV charging purposes as “EV CAPABLE” in accordance with the California Electrical Code. 4.106.4.2.5 Electric Vehicle Ready Space Signage. Electric vehicle ready spaces shall be identified by signage or pavement markings,in compliance with Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings)or its successor(s). 4.106.4.3 Electric vehicle charging for additions and alterations of parking facilities serving existing multifamily buildings. When new parking facilities are added,or electrical systems or lighting of existing parking facilities are added or altered and the work requires a building permit,ten (10)percent of the total number of parking spaces added or altered, shall be electric vehicle charging spaces (EV spaces) capable of supporting future Level 2 EVSE. Notes: 1.Construction documents are intended to demonstrate the project’s capability and capacity for facilitating future EV charging. 2.There is no requirement for EV spaces to be constructed or available until EV chargers are installed for use. SECTION 5.106 SITE DEVELOPMENT 5.106.5.3 Electric vehicle (EV) charging. [N]Construction to provide electric vehicle infrastructure and facilitate electric vehicle charging shall comply with Section 5.106.5.3.1 and shall be provided in accordance with regulations in the California Building Code and the California Electrical Code.Accessible EVCS shall be provided in accordance with the California Building Code Chapter 11B Section 11B-228.3.For EVCS signs,refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings)or its successor(s).Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. Exceptions: 1.On a case-by-case basis where the local enforcing agency has determined compliance with this section is not feasible based upon one of the following conditions: a. Where there is no local utility power supply. b. Where the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. c.Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcement agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements,directly related to the implementation of Section 5.106.5.3,may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space.EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.adversely impact the construction cost of the project. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 12 of 19 powered by Legistar™343 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. 2.Parking spaces accessible only by automated mechanical car parking systems are not required to comply with this code section. 3.Projects that receive valid entitlements from the City of South San Francisco within six (6)months of the effective date of the enabling ordinance shall provide,based on the total number of parking spaces shown below in Table 5.106.5.3.1.Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. The number of required EVCS (EV capable spaces provided with EVSE)in column 3 count toward the total number of required EV capable spaces shown in column 2. TABLE 5.106.5.3.1 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTUAL PARKING SPACES NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CAPABLE SPACES NUMBER OF EVCS (EV CAPABLE SPACES PROVIDED WITH EVSE)2 0-9 0 0 10-25 4 0 26-50 8 2 51-75 13 3 76-100 17 4 101-150 25 6 151-200 35 9 201 and over 20 percent of total1 25 percent of EV capable spaces 1 5.106.5.3.1 Nonresidential Occupancy Class B Offices - Shared Parking Space. 5.106.5.3.1.1 New Construction.Twenty percent (20%)of parking spaces shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready.ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging.Thirty percent (30%) of parking spaces provided shall be Level 2 EV Capable. 5.106.5.3.1 EV capable spaces. [N]EV capable spaces shall be provided in accordance with Table 5.106.5.3.1 and the following requirements: 1.Raceways complying with the California Electrical Code and no less than 1-inch (25 mm)diameter shall be provided and shall originate at a service panel or a subpanel(s)serving the area,and shall terminate in close proximity to the proposed location of the EV capable space and into a suitable listed cabinet,box,enclosure or equivalent. A common raceway may be used to serve multiple EV capable spaces. 2.A service panel or subpanel(s)shall be provided with panel space and electrical load capacity for a dedicated 208/240 volts,40-ampere minimum branch circuits for each EV capable space,with delivery of 30-ampere minimum to an installed EVSE at each EVCS. 3 The electrical system and any on-site distribution transformers shall have sufficient capacity to supply full rated amperage at each EV capable space. 4.The service panel or subpanel circuit directory shall identify the reserved overcurrent protective device space (s)as “EV CAPABLE”.The raceway termination location shall be permanently and visibly marked as “EV City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 13 of 19 powered by Legistar™344 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. (s)as “EV CAPABLE”.The raceway termination location shall be permanently and visibly marked as “EV CAPABLE”. Note:A parking space served by electric vehicle supply equipment or designed as a future EV charging space shall count as at least one standard automobile parking space only for the purpose of complying with any applicable minimum parking space requirements established by an enforcement agency.See Vehicle Code Section 22511.2 for further details. TABLE 5.106.5.3.1 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTUAL PARKING SPACES NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CAPABLE SPACES NUMBER OF EVCS (EV CAPABLE SPACES PROVIDED WITH EVSE)2 0-9 0 0 10-25 4 0 26-50 8 2 51-75 13 3 76-100 17 4 101-150 25 6 151-200 35 9 201 and over 20 percent of total1 25 percent of EV capable spaces 1 1. Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. 2.The number of required EVCS (EV capable spaces provided with EVSE)in column 3 count toward the total number of required EV capable spaces shown in column 2. … 5.106.5.3.2 Electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS). EV capable spaces shall be provided with EVSE to create EVCS in the number indicated in Table 5.106.5.3.1. The EVCS required by Table 5.106.5.3.1 may be provided with EVSE in any combination of Level 2 and Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC), except that at least one Level 2 EVSE shall be provided. One EV charger with multiple connectors capable of charging multiple EVs simultaneously shall be permitted if the electrical load capacity required by Section 5.106.5.3.1 for each EV capable space is accumulatively supplied to the EV charger. The installation of each DCFC EVSE shall be permitted to reduce the minimum number of required EV capable spaces without EVSE by five and reduce proportionally the required electrical load capacity to the service panel or subpanel. 5.106.5.3.2 Hotel and Motel Occupancies - Shared Parking Facilities. 5.106.5.3.2.1 New Construction.Five percent (5%)of parking spaces provided shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready.ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging.Twenty-five percent (25%)of parking spaces provided shall be Low Power Level 2 EV Ready space.Ten percent (10%)of City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 14 of 19 powered by Legistar™345 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. parking spaces provided shall be Level 2 EV Capable. 5.106.5.3.3 All Other Nonresidential Occupancies - Shared Parking Facilities. 5.106.5.3.3.1 New Construction.Ten percent (10%)of parking spaces provided shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready.ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging.Ten percent (10%) of parking spaces provided shall be Level 2 EV Capable. 5.106.5.3.3 Use of automatic load management systems (ALMS). ALMS shall be permitted for EVCS.When ALMS is installed,the required electrical load capacity specified in Section 5.106.5.3.1 for each EVCS may be reduced when serviced by an EVSE controlled by an ALMS.Each EVSE controlled by an ALMS shall deliver a minimum 30 amperes to an EV when charging one vehicle and shall deliver a minimum 3.3 kW while simultaneously charging multiple EVs. 5.106.5.3.4 Direct current fast charging stations.One DCFC may be substituted for up to five (5)EVCS to meet the requirements of 5.106.5.3.1,5.106.5.3.2,and 5.106.5.3.3.Where ALMS serve DCFC stations,the power demand from the DCFC shall be prioritized above Level 1 and Level 2 spaces. 5.106.5.3.4 Accessible EVCS. When EVSE is installed,accessible EVCS shall be provided in accordance with the California Building Code Chapter 11B Section 11B-228.3. Note:For EVCS signs,refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings) or its successor(s). 5.106.5.4 Electric vehicle (EV) charging readiness: medium-duty and heavy-duty. [N] Construction shall comply with Section 5.106.5.4.1 to facilitate future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE).Construction for warehouses,grocery stores and retail stores with planned off-street loading spaces shall also comply with Section 5.106.5.4.1 for future installation of medium-and heavy-duty EVSE.Accessible EVCS shall be provided in accordance with the California Building Code Chapter 11B Section 11B-228.3.For EVCS signs,refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings) or its successor(s). Exceptions: 1.On a case-by-case basis where the local enforcing agency has determined compliance with this section is not feasible based upon one of the following conditions: a. Where there is no local utility power supply. b. Where the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. c.Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcing agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements,directly related to the implementation of Section 5.106.5.3,may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space.EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.adversely impact the construction cost of the project. When EVCS(s)are installed,it shall be in accordance with the California Building Code,the California Electrical Code as follows: 5.106.5.4.1 Electric vehicle charging readiness requirements for Warehouses,grocery stores and retail City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 15 of 19 powered by Legistar™346 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. stores with planned off-street loading spaces. [N]In order to avoid future demolition when adding EV supply and distribution equipment,spare raceway(s)or busway(s)and adequate capacity for transformer(s),service panel(s)or subpanel(s)shall be installed at the time of construction in accordance with the California Electrical Code.Construction plans and specifications shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 2.The transformer,main service equipment and subpanels shall meet the minimum power requirement in Table 5.106.5.4.1 to accommodate the dedicated branch circuits for the future installation of EVSE. 3.The construction documents shall indicate one or more location(s)convenient to the planned off-street loading space(s)reserved for medium-and heavy-duty ZEV charging cabinets and charging dispensers, and a pathway reserved for routing of conduit from the termination of the raceway(s)or busway(s)to the charging cabinet(s) and dispenser(s), as shown in Table 5.106.5.4.1. 4.Raceway(s)or busway(s)originating at a main service panel or a subpanel(s)serving the area where potential future medium-and heavy-duty EVSE will be located and shall terminate in close proximity to the potential future location of the charging equipment for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. 5.The raceway(s)or busway(s)shall be of sufficient size to carry the minimum additional system load to the future location of the charging for medium- and heavy-duty EVs as shown in Table 5.106.5.4.1. TABLE 5.106.5.4.1, Raceway Conduit and Panel power Requirements for Medium-and-Heavy-Duty EVSE [N] Building type Building Size (sq. ft.) Number of Off-street loading spaces Additional capacity Required (kVa) for Raceway & Busway and Transformer & Panel Grocery 10,000 to 90,000 1 or 2 200 Grocery Greater than 90,000 3 or Greater 400 Grocery Greater than 90,000 1 or Greater 400 Retail 10,000 to 135,000 1 or 2 200 Retail 10,000 to 135,000 3 or Greater 400 Retail Greater than 135,000 1 or Greater 400 Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse 20,000 to 256,000 20,000 to 256,000 1 or 2 200 3 or Greater 400 Greater than 256,000 1 or Greater 400 B.Section 15.22.021 Amendments to the CALGreen Code. The California Green Building Code (Cal.Code Regs.Title 24,Part 11)is amended as follows,with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough.Chapter,section and table numbers used herein are those of the California Green Building Code.Sections and subsections not amended are not included below City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 16 of 19 powered by Legistar™347 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. and shall remain in full force and effect. CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS ADDITION.An extension or increase in floor area of an existing building or structure. ALL-ELECTRIC BUILDING.A building that contains no combustion equipment or plumbing for combustion equipment serving space heating (including fireplaces),water heating (including pools and spas), cooking appliances (including barbeques),and clothes drying,within the building or building property lines, and instead uses electric heating appliances for service. ALTERATION OR ALTER.Any construction or renovation to an existing structure other than repair for the purpose of maintenance or addition. COMBUSTION EQUIPMENT.Any equipment or appliance used for space heating,water heating,cooking, clothes drying and/or lighting that uses fuel gas. COMMERCIAL FOOD HEAT-PROCESSING EQUIPMENT.Any equipment used in a food establishment for heat-processing food or utensils and that produces grease vapors,steam,fumes,smoke,or odors that are required to be removed through a local exhaust ventilation system,as defined in the California Mechanical Code. ELECTRIC HEATING APPLIANCE.A device that produces heat energy to create a warm environment by the application of electric power to resistance elements,refrigerant compressors,or dissimilar material junctions, as defined in the California Mechanical Code. FUEL GAS. A gas that is natural, manufactured, liquefied petroleum, or a mixture of these. NEWLY CONSTRUCTED (or NEW CONSTRUCTION).A newly constructed building (or new construction) does not include additions, alterations or repairs. PROCESS EQUIPMENT.Equipment for which sustained temperatures typically in excess of three hundred fifty degrees Fahrenheit are required and demonstrably not achievable with commercial electric equipment. CHAPTER 5 - NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES Division 5.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION 5.106 - SITE DEVELOPMENT …….. 5.106.13 All-electric buildings.New construction buildings and qualifying alteration projects shall comply with Section 5.106.13.1 or 5.106.13.2 so that they do not use combustion equipment or are ready to facilitate future electrification. 5.106.13.1 New construction.All newly constructed buildings shall be all-electric buildings.Newly City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 17 of 19 powered by Legistar™348 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. constructed buildings exclude alterations to existing buildings and tenant improvements. Exceptions: 1.If the applicant establishes that there is not an all-electric prescriptive compliance pathway for the building system under the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards,and that the building is not able to achieve the performance compliance standard applicable to the building under the Energy Efficiency Standards using commercially available technology and an approved calculation method, then the local enforcing agency may grant a modification.The applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.13.2. 2.Nonresidential buildings containing kitchens located in a place of public accommodation,as defined in the California Building Code Chapter 2,may apply to the local enforcing agency for a modification to install commercial food heat-processing equipment served by fuel gas.The local enforcing agency may grant the modification if they find: A business-related need to cook with combustion equipment; and a.The need cannot be achieved equivalently with an electric heating appliance; and b.The applicant has installed energy efficient equipment based on Energy Star or California Energy Wise qualifications, as available. c.The applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.13.2. 3.Critical facilities back-up power necessary to protect public health or safety in the event of an electric grid outage. 4.Process equipment for industrial, laboratories and medical uses. 5.Nonresidential building projects that receive valid entitlements from the City of South San Francisco within six (6)months of the effective date of the enabling ordinance are not required to be designed and constructed as all-electric.If the Director of Economic &Community Development or his or her designee grants a modification pursuant to this Exception,the applicant shall comply with the pre- wiring provision of Section 5.106.13.2. Inactive Fuel Gas Infrastructure may be extended to spaces that are anticipated to qualify for the exceptions contained in this chapter.The inactive Fuel Gas Infrastructure shall not be activated,have a meter installed,or otherwise used unless the exceptions specified in this chapter have been confirmed as part of the issuance of a building permit.If the Fuel Gas Infrastructure is no longer serving one of the exceptions contained in this chapter,it shall either be capped,otherwise terminated,or removed by the entity previously entitled to the exception, in a manner pursuant to all applicable Codes. South San Francisco shall have the authority to approve alternative materials,design and methods of construction or equipment per California Building Code Section 104. 5.106.13.2 Requirements for combustion equipment. Where combustion equipment is allowed per Exceptions under 5.106.13.1,the construction drawings shall indicate electrical infrastructure and physical space accommodating the future installation of an electrical heating appliance in the following ways,as certified by a registered design professional or licensed electrical City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 18 of 19 powered by Legistar™349 File #:22-994 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:17a. contractor: 1.Branch circuit wiring,electrically isolated and designed to serve all electrical heating appliances in accordance with manufacturer requirements and the California Electrical Code,including the appropriate voltage,phase,minimum amperage,and an electrical receptacle or junction box within five feet of the appliance that is accessible with no obstructions.Appropriately sized conduit may be installed in lieu of conductors; and 2.Labeling of both ends of the unused conductors or conduit shall be with “For Future Electrical Appliance”; and 3.Reserved circuit breakers in the electrical panel for each branch circuit,appropriately labeled (e.g. “Reserved for Future Electric Range”),and positioned on the opposite end of the panel supply conductor connection; and 4.Connected subpanels,panelboards,switchboards,busbars,and transformers shall be sized to serve the future electrical heating appliances.The electrical capacity requirements shall be adjusted for demand factors in accordance with the California Electric Code; and 5.Physical space for future electrical heating appliances,including equipment footprint,and if needed a pathway reserved for routing of ductwork to heat pump evaporator(s),shall be depicted on the construction drawings.The footprint necessary for future electrical heating appliances may overlap with non-structural partitions and with the location of currently designed combustion equipment. SECTION III.SEVERABILITY In the event any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional,such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION IV.PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)days from and after its adoption.Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933,a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney.At least five (5)days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted,the City Clerk shall:(1)publish the summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk's office a certified copy of this Ordinance.Within fifteen (15)days after the adoption of this ordinance,the City Clerk shall:(1)publish the summary,and (2)post in the City Clerk's office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance or otherwise voting. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 19 of 19 powered by Legistar™350 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-185 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:18. Report regarding the status of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South San Francisco and the South San Francisco Unified School District.(Scott Campbell, Chief of Police) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive a report on the status of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South San Francisco and the South San Francisco Unified School District and provide feedback and direction. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION As described in the SSFPD-SSFUSD Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)pertaining to the School Liaison Officer (SLO)Program,an annual review will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the program,and whether the parameters of the MOU are being followed.Pursuant to the MOU,the first annual report was to be completed in March 2023. Factors included in the annual report include: 1.Success of established program goals and objectives. 2.An appraisal of areas with opportunities for improvement. 3.Aggregated data regarding why the police were called to campus,who called them,demographic data on the students and other people with whom the police interacted,and outcomes (including arrests, citations, and other relevant data). 4.A summary of the student arrests and citations by gender, race/ethnicity, and any other relevant data. I.Achievement of the Goals and Objectives of the SLO Program A.Protect the constitutional and civil rights of students. All SSFPD officers are entrusted with the responsibility of protecting the constitutional and civil rights of all individuals, but particularly the students in our school district. B.Maintain a safe and secure environment on school campuses which will be conducive to learning. All SSFPD officers are expected to maintain safe and secure school campuses.Officers receive ongoing training regarding Active Killer and Critical Incident Responses,Crisis Intervention and De-escalation, Behavioral Intervention,and Procedural Justice.SLOs receive additional training specific to Cyber Incidents,Student Threat Assessment and Suicide Prevention,Vulnerability Assessments of School Facilities, and addressing the needs of students with Disabilities, and Mental Health Issues. C.Establish a positive working partnership. SLOs actively seek out opportunities to meet with school site and District administrators,as well as certificated and classified employees to maintain positive working partnerships that help facilitate theCity of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™351 File #:23-185 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:18. certificated and classified employees to maintain positive working partnerships that help facilitate the effective handling of school incidents that involve the police department.Based on the positive partnerships that have been developed and maintained,numerous school site and District administrators consistently reach out to the SLOs for advice and to share information relevant to the safety and wellbeing of the students and staff. The SLOs adopted a new uniform that is noticeably different than the uniform worn by patrol officers.The new uniform consists of a black polo shirt and khaki pants.The utility belt worn the SLOs is made of black nylon that is designed to be less noticeable.The new uniform gives the SLOs a more relaxed,and significantly less imposing appearance,while still affording officers the protection and access to safety equipment they may need.The new uniforms appear to have been well-received by students and school staff/administrators. D.SSFPD desires to promote positive attitudes regarding the role of the police in society through non- punitive,alliance-building interactions with students and staff,and will seek the District’s partnership and input of District administrators in creating such opportunities. The SLOs and other SSFPD officers have been called upon to assist with,and participate in,a variety of school activities over the past year.These events include Red Ribbon Week,Every Kid Deserves a Bike, Folklorico Dance Show,Halloween Trunk or Treat,and the Ruby Bridges Walk-to-School Day.The fact that officers have been invited to these events demonstrates the strength of the positive partnerships that exist between the District and the police department,particularly the SLOs.The presence of officers at these events appears to have been well-received by the students and their families.In fact,one elementary school conducted a survey of parents regarding traffic in front of the school,and several responses requested additional police presence to help ensure the safety of the students and to facilitate the smooth flow of traffic before and after school hours. E.Conduct criminal investigations. The police department has always,and will continue to,conduct criminal investigations involving students and/or staff whenever necessary and appropriate.The goal of such investigations is to ensure the rights and well-being of all involved parties are protected using the least restrictive and imposing methods possible. F.Refer student cases to restorative justice alternatives/programs and court diversion to the greatest extent possible prior to relying on the court or penal system. Whenever possible and appropriate (given the nature of the incident),incidents involving students are handled administratively by the school site or District.The SLOs serve as a resource and allow administrators to determine the most effective and least restrictive resolution. G.Ensure that all SSFPD officers understand the needs,strengths,and challenges of various student groups based on race,ethnicity,national origin,disability,religion,gender,sexual orientation,economic status, age, cultural group, immigration status, or affiliation with any other similar identifiable group. All officers,but particularly SLOs,complete ongoing training regarding Bias-Free Policing,Anti- Discrimination,Behavioral Intervention,Crisis Intervention,Suicide Prevention,and Handling Incidents Involving Individuals with Disabilities and Mental Illness.The police department does not,nor has it ever, City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™352 File #:23-185 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:18. allowed officers to inquire about an individual’s immigration status for any reason. II.Aggregated Data for Police Calls on Campus A.Calls for Service (August to December 2022) 368 Approximately 12%of the calls were initiated by officers.Those were either follow-up investigations, officer-initiated foot patrols, or officer-initiated Adopt-a-School visits. The majority of calls were initiated by either District employees,student parents,alarm companies, passersby, or other non-school-related individuals. The highest number of calls for service were 911 hang-ups and burglary alarms.The third highest number were calls,texts,and email requests from school administrators seeking advice or guidance from the SLOs. Of the 368 calls for service,the majority came from South San Francisco High School (22.8%),El Camino High School (14.9%), and Alta Loma Middle School (12.2%). B.Arrests No school-related arrests of students or District staff were made during this reporting period. C.Citations No school-related citations were issued to students or District staff during this reporting period. III.Opportunities for Improvement After the first year of evaluation,no areas in need of improvement have been identified or brought to the attention of the police department.An internal review of the SLO program shows that the parameters of the MOU are being strictly adhered to,and that the SLO program continues to be an effective way to address school-related incidents and maintain positive relationships with our school community. The MOU allows for the District to conduct an internal survey of school administration,staff,and student representatives who have had interactions with law enforcement officers on campus.The police department is unaware of a survey having been conducted but is open and receptive to any feedback such a survey yields. IV.Recommendations After consultation with SSFUSD Administration Staff,it was mutually agreed that the annual MOU report should be made in September rather than March of each year to capture information more accurately for an entire school year. This would make the next annual report due in September 2024. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™353 File #:23-185 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:18. FISCAL IMPACT There is no known fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. RELATIONSHIP TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN This MOU meets strategic planning objective 3.0 Public Safety:providing skilled police,emergency service medical service and emergency management. CONCLUSION Based on the results of this report,the police department recommends continuing the School Liaison Officer Program for another year.The goals and objectives of the MOU have been met,and the program appears to be well-received by students, District staff, and parents. The high number of calls for service shows a need for having officers dedicated to our school community. Arrests were minimal,and the majority of criminal investigations conducted were handled administratively by the District instead of being referred to the criminal justice system.The SLOs have built and maintained a positive partnership with the District as evidenced by their invited participation in a number of school functions and events.In addition,the SLOs have specific and unique training that helps them to better serve our students while keeping the school environment safe, inclusive, and conducive to learning. It is recommended that the City Council receive a report on the status of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South San Francisco and the South San Francisco Unified School District and provide feedback and direction. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™354 355 School Calls Statistics School Calls August 2022 -December 2022 356 Total number of calls 368 357 Number of Calls for Service by School 358 Arrests Made on School Campus by SSFPD NO students were arrested on school campus while school was in session. 359 School Events Attended by SSFPD 360 5/16/22 Every Kid Deserves a Bike (Spruce Elementary) 5/24/22 Every Kid Deserves A Bike (Martin Elementary) 10/25/22 Red Ribbon Week (Sunshine Gardens) Teacher Appreciation (Los Cerritos) 10/26/22 Red Ribbon Week (Martin Elementary / Spruce Elementary) 10/29/22 Martin School 100th Anniversary 361 10/31/22 Trunk or Treat Event (Martin Elementary) 11/2/22 Big 5 / Emergency Plan Presentation with Martin School Staff 11/5/22 Bell Game at SSFHS 11/14/22 Ruby Bridges Walk-to-School Day 12/2/22 Folklorico Dance Show at SSFHS 362 SLO Training and Uniform Change 363 SLO Attended Trainings ●Advanced Crisis Intervention ●Behavioral Intervention ●Behavioral Threat Assessment ●Big Five Training ●Gun Violence Restraining Orders ●Incident Command for Schools ●Intervention & De-escalation techniques for SROs ●Intro to SRO Programs ●Procedural Justice / Community Policing to Reduce Conflict ●Responding to Cyber Incidents in Schools ●Response Tactics to Critical Incidents & In-Progress Crimes ●School Resource Officer Training ●Student threat assesment & suicide prevention ●Vulnerability assessment for school facilities * A total of 17 training classes attended * Totaling approximately 140 hours of training 364 Uniform Change Patrol Officer School Liaison Officer 365 366 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-201 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:19. Report regarding a resolution to authorize application to and participation in the California Department of Housing and Community Development Prohousing Designation Program (Adena Friedman,Principal Planner and Tony Rozzi, Chief Planner) Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize application to and participation in the California Department of Housing and Community Development Prohousing Designation Program. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On July 1,2021,the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)established the Prohousing Designation Program pursuant to California Government Code §65589.9.The Program creates incentives for cities and counties that are compliant with Housing Element requirements and can demonstrate that they have enacted,or plan to enact,Prohousing policies in four category areas:Favorable Zoning and Land Use,Accelerating Production Timeframes,Reducing Construction and Development Costs,and Providing Financial Subsidies.Jurisdictions who are awarded a Prohousing Designation will receive a competitive advantage for critical state affordable housing and infrastructure grant programs,including the Prohousing Incentive Pilot Program,Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program,Transformative Climate Communities, and the Infill Incentive Grant Program. Jurisdictions wishing to apply for the Prohousing Designation must complete and submit an application to HCD which includes documentation of relevant policies and regulations,and a resolution authorizing application to the Program.Applicants must demonstrate that they have enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the acceleration of housing production in each of the four categories.A Prohousing Designation requires a total of 30 points or more across all four categories. Planning Division staff is currently drafting the application and has determined that South San Francisco will qualify for at least 30 points and has the required policies and/or programs in each of the four categories,such as the City’s existing zoning regulations which permit high-density housing proximate to transit,technical assistance program for accessory dwelling unit (ADU)applications,and planning processes such as streamlined CEQA analysis and objective design standards.The application scorecard is attached to this staff report listing all the potential programs with a description of the City’s qualifying programs and relevant document links.If the City Council chooses to authorize application to the program,Planning Division staff will submit a completed application to HCD. Upon submission of the City’s application,HCD will complete a review of the application and will notify the City in writing within 60 days of its determination.If approved,the City will receive an official letter City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™367 File #:23-201 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:19. City in writing within 60 days of its determination.If approved,the City will receive an official letter formalizing the Prohousing Designation. FISCAL IMPACT Applying for the Prohousing Designation will have no fiscal impact to the City.If awarded the Prohousing Designation,the City would receive a competitive advantage in certain State grant programs,which would help accelerate affordable housing production in South San Francisco. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN The proposed Municipal Code amendment helps achieve the following priority of the City’s Strategic Plan: Priority #2: Quality of Life: ·Excellent bike paths, pedestrian ways, and multi-modal transportation options ·Full range of housing options CONCLUSION Adopting a resolution to authorize the City to apply for HCD’s Prohousing Designation supports the City’s efforts to provide a wide range of housing options and upgraded mobility networks,by giving the City a competitive advantage when applying for several State grant-funded programs. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize application to and participation in the HCD’s Prohousing Designation Program. Attachment: 1.Prohousing Designation Scorecard Associated File: 1. Prohousing Designation Resolution (Legistar File 23-202) City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™368 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 1 Category Number Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy Enacted or Proposed Documentation Type (e.g., resolution, zoning code) Insert Web Links to Documents Points Enhancement Category Number Enhancement Points Total Points 1A South San Francisco’s opportunity sites development capacity under adopted zoning is 230% of RHNA Target E Housing Element Housing Element 3 1 2 5 1B Recently updated Zoning to include SB9 units in Single-family residential zones, permitting duplexes by right E Zoning Code Zoning Code, Section 20.070 3 6 1 4 1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above. No (Claiming via 1A) 369 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 2 1D Density Bonus program which exceed statutory requirements by 10% or more No 1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit law (e.g., permitting more than one ADU or JADU per single-family lot). These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above. No 1F Recently adopted zoning includes no minimum parking requirement for residential uses within Transit Station Areas, per AB2097. Applies to the majority of the City. E Zoning Code Zoning Code Section 20.330 Minimum Parking Waiver Map 2 1 2 4 370 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 3 IG Recently updated General Plan and Zoning permits residential in previous employment zones, creating mixed-use zones near transit E General Plan, Zoning Code General Plan Zoning Code, Section 20.090 1 2 1 2 IH Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio; height limits; minimum lot or unit sizes; setbacks; and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above. No 1I Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in No 371 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 4 Government Code section 66200. IJ The recently adopted Centennial Way Trail Master Plan includes a provision for allowing credits for off-site open space improvements to satisfy on-site requirements, thus allowing for additional units. Implementation requires a Zoning Ordinance Amedment P Master Plan Centennial Way Trail Master Plan 1 1 2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for a variety of housing types, including single-family and multifamily housing. No 2B With the adoption of the General Plan Update and certified EIR, South San Francisco has created a streamlined CEQA process for any residential project that complies with General Plan land use, zoning, E General Plan, General Plan Program EIR General Plan General Plan EIR 2 1 2 4 372 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 5 and objective design standards. The typical CEQA process for a multi-unit project will be an Environmental Compliance Analysis showing conformance with the General Plan Update EIR and self- mitigating measures. This is a checklist form completed by the applicant with relatively minimal expense by an environmental consultant or other qualified professional. Staff review this document as part of preparation for a public hearing. 2C The City routinely approves categorical and statutory exemptions for residential development, ranging from single-family units, to large multi- family development E CEQA Resolutions, Notices of Exemption, Zoning CEQA Resolution CEQA Resolution CEQA Resolution CEQA Resolution 2 2 373 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 6 Zoning 2D Establishment of permit processes that take less than four months. Policies under this Category (2)(D) must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits. No 2E City’s recently adopted General Plan implemented changes to ensure compliance with SB330 requirements for streamlining, and ensure certainty for residential development. One of the important details is a limit of 5 public meetings. E Guidance Handout for Residential Applicants SB330 Guidance Handout 2 2 2F The recent zoning ordinance update changed approving body for residential projects consistent with the General Plan and Zoning from City Council to Planning Commission, reducing E Zoning Ordinance Zoning Ordinance 1 1 374 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 7 the number of public hearings required for approval. 2G The City’s Zoning Ordinance contains objective development and design standards. The City has also created checklists to help applicants demonstrate zoning compliance. E Zoning Ordinance Zoning Checklists Zoning Ordinance Zoning Checklist 1 1 2H City of South San Francisco has a consolidated Permit Center, both at a physical location and online. E Website, Physical Building Permit Center 1 1 2I Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs, multifamily housing, or homes affordable to lower- or moderate- income households. No 2J One entitlement application available for all entitlements E Application Form Planning Application 1 1 2K South San Francisco Development and E Website Development and 1 1 375 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 8 Construction Website provides information about projects in the in entitlement pipeline, including recently approved projects and those under construction Construction Website 2L Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to Category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this Category (2)(L). No (Claiming via 2E) 2M Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes. No 3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development. No 376 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 9 3B The City has hired a nonprofit (Hello Housing) to provide free feasibility and project management support to homeowners and wish to add an ADU or JADU. E Bright in Your Own Backyard Program Program Website 2 2 1 3 3C Housing Element Program SNP-5.5 to create ADU rent restriction incentives for extremely low- income rent levels and/or targeting special needs populations. P Housing Element Housing Element 1 1 3D Promoting innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models) that reduce development costs. No 3E The City recently adopted a new mobility plan, Active South City, which contains recommended improvements to E Mobility Plan Active South City 1 1 2 2 377 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 10 create complete bicycle and pedestrian networks throughout South San Francisco. The Plan also prioritizes improvements, and includes cost estimates to help allocate City funding towards highest priority and most impactful projects. 3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959. No 3G The Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (HEART) has prepared designs for green, all-electric detached ADUs for South San Francisco residents. E Pre-Approved Designs, available on Website Pre-Approved Plans 1 1 3H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably reduce No 378 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 11 construction or development costs. 4A The City has an established Affordable Housing Trust Fund, used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate, low, very low, and extremely low-income households. Funds include affordable housing commercial linkage fees and inclusionary housing in-lieu fees E Municipal Code Municipal Code 2 2 4B Provide grants or low- interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to lower- and moderate-income households. No 4C A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, No 379 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 12 or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to lower income households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or below- market land leases. 4D Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to lower income households. No 4E Directed residual redevelopment funds to affordable housing. No 4F Development and regular (at least No 380 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 13 biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source. 4G Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. No 4H Housing Element Program – Affordable Housing Fund Policy. its Commercial Linkage Fee over the next five years. City staff will conduct a hearing with the City Council to prioritize these funds and their potential use for the development of new affordable housing once enough funds are received. P Housing Element Housing Element 1 1 TOTAL 29 11 40 381 ProHousing Application: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Page 14 382 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-211 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:19a. Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizing application to and participation in the Prohousing Designation Program WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“PDP” or “Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”). NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1.Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department. 2.Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law. 3.Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50. 4.If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™383 File #:23-211 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:19a. deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents). 5.Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law. 6.Sharon Ranals, City Manager, or her designee is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™384 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-183 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20. Report regarding a resolution affirming the City’s support for Bridge Housing Corporation’s application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)Grant program,authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with Bridge Housing Corporation,and approving Budget Amendment Number 23.057 appropriating $250,000 to acquire an EV sub-compact sweeper. (Nell Selander, Economic & Community Development Director) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution: 1)Affirming the City’s support for BRIDGE Housing Corporation’s (BRIDGE)application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)Grant program for the 1051 Mission Affordable (PUC Project)project requesting up to $50 million of AHSC funds for affordable housing development and transportation infrastructure improvements; 2)Authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with BRIDGE as required for reimbursement for the City’s Sustainable Transit Infrastructure (STI)and Transit-Related Amenities (TRA) projects; and 3)Approving Budget Amendment 23.057 appropriating $250,000 for the acquisition of an EV sub- compact sweeper to service protected bikeways,parking lots,parking garages,plazas,Centennial Trail, and Bay Trail. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The 158 affordable units being developed by BRIDGE as part of the PUC Project are known for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)grant application as 1051 Mission Affordable.BRIDGE anticipates beginning construction in mid-2024 after completing their construction financing.Key to assembling the funds to build this much-needed affordable housing is securing two major State of California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD)grants:the Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG)and AHSC.The project was awarded $28.8 million in IIG funds in February 2023 and the AHSC application is the subject of this staff report.Following award of HCD funds,BRIDGE will apply for low-income housing tax credits to complete the project’s financing. The AHSC state grant program is a combined affordable housing and sustainable transportation infrastructure funding program that aims to support affordable housing units that connect with greenhouse gas-reducing transportation options for residents.The AHSC program uses State Cap &Trade funding from greenhouse gas- generating uses throughout the state to fund these pollution-reducing objectives.Applications for Round 7 of City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™385 File #:23-183 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20. generating uses throughout the state to fund these pollution-reducing objectives.Applications for Round 7 of the AHSC program are due on April 4, 2023 with an award announcement anticipated late August 2023. AHSC-Funded City Transportation Improvements The City’s Planning and Engineering Divisions have been working with BRIDGE and their technical consultant to identify sustainable transportation infrastructure improvements for which to request AHSC funding.Such improvements must be within one half mile of the project site and to maximize competitiveness should improve the safety and convenience of bicyclists and transit riders in the City and support the community’s existing plans for multi-modal improvements.After careful analysis of existing unfunded projects and in accordance with the AHSC criteria,City staff has identified the following Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI) and Transportation-Related Amenities (TRA)in BRIDGE’s application for AHSC funding (see Attachment 1 for a map of the identified improvements). City Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI) If awarded,the AHSC funds -received through an Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with BRIDGE - will fund $1 million for the installation of approximately 9,000-feet of Class IV (separated and protected)bike lane along Westborough Boulevard between Camaritas Avenue and Junipero Sierra Boulevard.The bikeway will run on both sides of the street, with 4,500 linear feet on each side of the road. Completion of this STI improvement requires obtaining an encroachment permit from the County of San Mateo to complete the work in their right of way.Upon the City’s request of County staff for the necessary encroachment permit,the County responded that in order to obtain the encroachment permit,City will agree to sweep and maintain the bike lane once installed.City staff are currently negotiating an annual payment from the County for sweeping performed in their right of way.It should be noted that this improvement is also identified in the County’s bike and pedestrian master plan,as well as the City’s recently adopted Active South City Plan. This new protected bike lane,as well as all other Class I and IV separated or protected bike lanes,cannot be swept with the city’s current fleet of EV sweepers.Staff is requesting approval of a budget amendment to fund the acquisition of a new EV sub-compact sweeper (Attachment 2).This new equipment is in keeping with the City’s desire to transition to alternative fueled vehicles and will provide much needed improvements to current sweeping operations.In addition to currently installed protected bike lanes,the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan proposes over thirty-eight miles of protected or separated bike lanes that cannot be swept with current equipment.Additionally,this smaller sweeper will be used in the City’s parking garages,parking lots,and plazas.The sweeper includes the ability to vacuum up debris from tree wells and is outfitted with a pressure washer for use when needed. City Transportation-Related Amenities (TRA) If awarded, the AHSC funds would pay $1 million to the following bus bulb-outs and shelters. 1)Installation of five bus shelters:one shelter at the northwest corner and one shelter at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Willow Avenue;one shelter at the northwest corner and one shelter at the City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™386 File #:23-183 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20. corner of Grand Avenue and Willow Avenue;one shelter at the northwest corner and one shelter at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Chestnut Avenue;and one shelter at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Maple Avenue. 2)Installation of four bus bulb-outs:one bus-bulb at the northwest corner and one bus-bulb at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Willow Avenue,and one bus-bulb at the northwest corner and one bus-bulb at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Chestnut Avenue. AHSC-Funded Developer Transportation Improvements In addition to the City transportation improvements discussed above,BRIDGE will take on transportation improvements included in the scope of the PUC Project and fronting their affordable building.These require some cooperation from the City in maintaining site control or property owned by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC)on which the improvements will be built.Specifically,those improvements include the following STI elements: 1)Construct new sidewalk and related improvements along a portion of the West side of Mission Road, from approximately Grand Avenue to Oak Avenue and 2)Construct raised crosswalks located within Mission Road at approximately Grand Avenue and Oak Avenue, and within Oak Avenue at approximately Mission Road. The City currently has a permit to do work in this same SFPUC-owned parcel as part of the Library Parks and Recreation (LPR) project. AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement The AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement (Agreement)provides for the event in which BRIDGE is awarded the grant and the City can receive funds for the identified STI and TRA projects.The Agreement stipulated that the City will receive $1 million for STI projects and $1 million for TRA projects.Additionally, cost overruns for the identified projects are to be born by the City.Staff has identified and cost-estimated these projects conservatively so as to limit the risk that there are cost overruns. FISCAL IMPACT Should BRIDGE be awarded the AHSC grant,$2 million would pass through BRIDGE to the City for the projects identified in this report.While staff do not anticipate cost overruns,any that could not be mitigated could be borne by other grants (if awarded),or the City’s legacy Bike and Pedestrian Impact Fee or new Citywide Transportation Impact Fee. Additionally,there is the fiscal impact to Street Cleaning Fund 100-13440-6008 associated with approving Budget Amendment Number 23.057 appropriating $250,000 for the mini sweeper.This budget amendment will transfer the funds from Infrastructure Reserves.While this appropriation is not required today to advance this grant application,the equipment is already needed to better maintain existing City facilities and there is a City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™387 File #:23-183 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20. roughly one-year lead time to procure the sweeper. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Supporting affordable housing and alternative modes of transportation is in line with the City’s Strategic Plan Priority #2:Quality of Life,providing a full range of housing options and providing excellent bike paths, pedestrian ways, and multi-modal transportation options. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution: 1)Affirming the City’s support for BRIDGE Housing Corporation’s (BRIDGE)application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)Grant program for the 1051 Mission Affordable (PUC Project)project requesting up to $50 million of AHSC funds for affordable housing development and transportation infrastructure improvements; 2)Authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with BRIDGE as required for reimbursement for the City’s Sustainable Transit Infrastructure (STI)and Transit-Related Amenities (TRA) projects; and 3)Approving Budget Amendment 23.057 appropriating $250,000 for the acquisition of an EV sub- compact sweeper to service protected bikeways,parking lots,parking garages,plazas,Centennial Trail, and Bay Trail. Attachments: 1.Map of City Improvements 2.Exprolink Madvac LS125 Sub-Compact Sweeper Quotation City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/17/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™388 389 390 391 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-237 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20a. Resolution affirming the City’s support for Bridge Housing Corporation’s application to the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)Grant program,authorizing the City Manager to execute an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement with Bridge Housing Corporation,and approving Budget Amendment Number 23.057 appropriating $250,000 to acquire an EV sub-compact sweeper. WHEREAS,the 158 affordable units being developed by Bridge Housing Corporation (BRIDGE)as part of the PUC Project are known for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC)grant application as 1051 Mission Affordable; and WHEREAS,key to assembling the funds to build this much-needed affordable housing is securing two major State of California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD)grants:the Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) and AHSC; and WHEREAS,the project was awarded $28.8 million in IIG funds in February 2023 and BRIDGE in cooperation with the City has assembled a highly-competitive AHSC application; and WHEREAS,the City has identified sustainable transportation infrastructure improvements for which to request AHSC funding as part of BRIDGE’s application; and WHEREAS,those identified improvements include 9,000 linear feet of Class IV (separated and protected)bike lane along Westborough Boulevard between Camaritas Avenue and Junipero Serra Boulevard,five bus shelters on Grand Avenue, four bus bulb-outs on Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS,in order to obtain reimbursement for the identified transportation infrastructure improvements,the City and BRIDGE must enter into an AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement (Agreement); and WHEREAS,the identified Class IV bike lane will require special equipment to sweep,known as an EV sub- compact sweeper,which will also have applications on other City-controlled and maintained right of way including Class IV bike lanes throughout the City, Centennial Trail, and the Bay Trail; and WHEREAS, a budget amendment is required to procure the EV sub-compact sweeper. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™392 File #:23-237 Agenda Date:3/22/2023 Version:1 Item #:20a. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco: 1.Affirms its support for Bridge Housing Corporation’s Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities grant application; 2.Authorizes the City Manager,or her designee,to execute the AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement substantially in the form incorporated as Exhibit A;to make any revisions,amendments,or modifications;to execute any other documents;and to take such other actions deemed necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent of this resolution which do not materially alter or increase the City's obligations thereunder, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney; and 3.Approves Budget Amendment 23.057 for 1)transferring $250,000 from Infrastructure Reserve Fund to Street Cleaning Fund 100-13440-6008 and 2)appropriating $250,000 from Street Cleaning Fund 100- 13440-6008 for the acquisition of an EV sub-compact sweeper. Attachments: 1.AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/24/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™393 1 144\324\3465950.7 AHSC IMPLEMENTATION AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT (1051 Mission Affordable) THIS AHSC IMPLEMENTATION AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of __________, 2023 (the “Effective Date”) between the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation (“Agency”), and BRIDGE Housing Corporation, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Developer “and collectively with the Agency, the “Parties”, or individually, a “Party”) upon the basis of the following facts, understanding and intentions of the Parties: A.The State of California, the Strategic Growth Council (“SGC”) and the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) issued a Notice of Funding Availability dated January 30, 2023 (the “AHSC NOFA”), under the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (“AHSC”) Program established under Division 44, Part 1 of the Public Resources Code, commencing with Section 75200 and as further governed by the AHSC Program Round 7 Guidelines dated December 15, 2022 (the “AHSC Guidelines”). B.Developer is applying for AHSC funds in response to the AHSC NOFA to provide funding for (A) development of the “1051 Mission Affordable” affordable housing project in the City of South San Francisco, California, to be constructed by the Developer (the “Housing Project”); (B) the construction of certain sustainable transportation infrastructure to be constructed by the Developer, and described more particularly below (the "Developer STI Improvements"); (C) the construction of certain sustainable transportation infrastructure to be constructed by the Agency and described more particularly below (the "Agency STI Improvements"); (D) the construction of certain transit related amenities to be constructed by the Agency (the "Agency TRA Improvements"; together with the Agency STI Improvements, the “Transportation Project”); and (E) the construction of certain transportation-related improvements to be constructed by other parties and performance of certain program costs elements (“Non-Agency Projects”). These improvements are described in more detail in the final application to be submitted by April 4, 2023 (collectively, the “AHSC Application”). The Agency is not a co- applicant with the Developer on the AHSC Application, but has rights of access and development over the property on which the Developer STI Improvements and the Transportation Project will take place (the “Transportation Property”). C.The AHSC Application is anticipated to seek an award to the Developer in an approximate aggregate amount of up to $50,000,000 in AHSC funds consisting of: (A) up to $35,000,000 of AHSC loan funds for a permanent loan (“AHSC Loan”) which will be disbursed to a limited partnership (the “Partnership”) formed for the development and operation of the Housing Project; (B) up to $5,000,000 of AHSC grant funds for the purpose of reimbursing the cost of the Developer STI Improvements; (C) up to $1,000,000 of AHSC grant funds for the purpose of reimbursing the cost of the Agency STI Improvements; (D) up to $1,000,000 of AHSC grant funds for the purpose of reimbursing the cost of Agency TRA Improvements; and (E) up to $8,000,000 of AHSC grant funds for the purpose of reimbursing the cost of Non-Agency Projects. Exhibit A Government Code Section 54957.5 SB 343 Agenda: 03/22/2023 Reg CC Item # 20 394 2 144\324\3465950.7 The AHSC grants shall be referred to collectively as the “AHSC Grants”. The AHSC Loan and the AHSC Grants are collectively referred to herein as the “AHSC Financing.” D. The Agency and Developer are entering into this Agreement to comply with the AHSC Guidelines and the specific AHSC “Program Threshold Requirements” set forth in Section 106 of the AHSC Guidelines, including, without limitation, the requirement that the Developer and Agency establish “site control” over the land on which the Transportation Project and the Developer STI Improvements will be constructed, and the requirement that grant recipients and sub-recipients demonstrate prior experience with similar transportation projects by providing evidence of at least two prior projects that are similar to the proposed AHSC project in scope and size, which have been completed by the applicant, or joint applicant, during the ten (10) years preceding the AHSC Application due date. The AHSC Program Threshold Requirements also state that applicants may demonstrate this requisite experience by using the past experience of work completed of a non-applicant so long as the applicants can provide an executed agreement with that specific non-applicant for the completion of the related work in the AHSC Application for which funding is sought. The Agency is a non-applicant, but, as set forth herein, will have obligations to complete the following Transportation Project: 1. Agency Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI): [Install approximately 9,000-feet of Class IV bike lane along Westborough Boulevard between Camaritas Avenue and Junipero Sierra Boulevard. The bikeway will run on both sides of the street, with 4,500 linear feet each way.] 2. Agency Transportation-Related Amenities (TRA): (a) Install 5 bus shelters: 1 shelter at the northwest corner and 1 shelter at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Willow Avenue, 1 shelter at the northwest corner and 1 shelter at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Chestnut Avenue, 1 shelter at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Maple Avenue. (b) Install 4 bus bulb-outs: 1 bus-bulb at the northwest corner and 1 bus-bulb at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Willow Avenue, bus-bulb at the northwest corner and 1 bus-bulb at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Chestnut Avenue. E. The Agency can demonstrate prior experience and provide evidence of at least two prior projects that are similar in scope and size which have been completed during the ten (10) years preceding April 4, 2023. Below is a list of these projects: 1. Agency STI EXAMPLE 1: Caltrain Access & Bay Trail Gap Closure Project. Description: The project installed approximately 1700-feet of Class IV separated bikeway along East Grand Avenue. The full scope was the project constructed 395 3 144\324\3465950.7 pedestrian and bicycle improvements that closed the gap between the new pedestrian and bicycle facility connection from the East Plaza of the new South San Francisco Caltrain station and the pedestrian and bicycle connections in the areas of East Grand Ave and Gateway Boulevard, and East Grand Avenue and Forbes Boulevard/Harbor Way. Completion Date: 1/1/2023 Construction Costs: $650,000 2. Agency STI EXAMPLE 2: North Access Bike Ped Improvement Project Description: This project installed approximately 100 feet of Class IV median- protected separated bikeway along North Access Road. The full scope of the project was to install the City’s first median-protected cycle track, a Class IV bike facility, and sidewalk widening improvements along North Access Road connecting South Airport Boulevard to the Bay Trail adjacent to ParkSFO, as part of the BCDC permitting requirements. Completion Date: 8/1/2020 Construction Costs: $597,000 3. Agency TRA EXAMPLE 1: Linden and Spruce Traffic Calming Improvements Description: The project installed concrete curb extensions “bulb-outs” along both Spruce Avenue and Linden Avenue which serve the Samtrans 130 Route. The bulb-outs along Linden Ave included storm drain biofiltration (bioswale) areas with an irrigation system. Pavement reconstructed and striped with high visibility “ladder” style crosswalks, new stop pavement markings, and new green-back shared bike/vehicle lane pavement markings “sharrows”. Completion Date: 7/9/2021 Construction Cost: $1,355,000 4. Agency TRA EXAMPLE 2: Sunshine Gardens Safety and Connectivity Improvements: Description: The project installed multiple bulb-outs, high-visibility yellow ladder crosswalks, edge lines, new ADA curb ramps, and a Class 3 bikeway to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety and connectivity in the Sunshine Gardens neighborhood. Construction Date: 3/20/2020 Construction Cost: $1,016,000 396 4 144\324\3465950.7 5. Agency [Add more STI/TRA projects as applicable.] F. The Developer, as set forth herein, will have obligations to complete the following Developer STI Improvements: 1. Developer Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI): (a) Construct new sidewalk and related improvements along a portion of the West side of Mission Road, from approximately Grand Avenue to Oak Avenue; (b) Construct raised crosswalks located within Mission Road at approximately Grand Avenue and Oak Avenue, and within Oak Avenue at approximately Mission Road. G. The Developer can demonstrate prior experience and provide evidence of at least two prior projects that are similar in scope and size which have been completed during the ten (10) years preceding April 4, 2023. Below is a list of these projects: 1. Developer STI EXAMPLE 1: [Description of prior project – BRIDGE to provide]. Completion Date: [_______] Construction Cost: [________] 2. Developer STI EXAMPLE 2: [Description of prior project – BRIDGE to provide]. Completion Date: [_______] Construction Cost: [________] F. The Agency shall be responsible for developing and constructing the Transportation Project and for conveying to Developer sufficient site control to enable Developer to complete the Developer STI Improvements (the “Agency Obligations”), and for all costs and expenses related thereto. Developer shall be responsible for constructing and developing the Housing Project and the Developer STI Improvements (together, the “Developer Obligations”), and for all costs and expenses related thereto, except as related to the Agency obligation to convey sufficient site control to enable Developer to complete the Developer STI Improvements. In connection with the AHSC Grants and AHSC Loan, Developer is required to enter into standard agreements, reimbursement agreements, and regulatory agreements with HCD where Developer will be liable for the full and timely performance by the Parties to complete the obligations set forth therein, including completion of the Housing Project, the Developer STI, the Transportation Project, and Non-Agency Projects, all as described in the AHSC Application. The AHSC Application and all standard agreements, reimbursement agreements, regulatory agreements and any other agreements required by HCD in connection with the AHSC Financing shall be collectively referred to herein as the “AHSC Documents”. G. The Agency and Developer each acknowledge and agree that the inability or failure by either Party to complete its obligations, and to fully and timely complete each Party’s respective 397 5 144\324\3465950.7 improvements required by the AHSC Documents, may affect the timing and right of the other Party to receive reimbursement of AHSC funds due the non-performing Party, notwithstanding the other Party’s full and timely performance of its obligations. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Obligations. The Agency shall, in its sole responsibility, complete the Transportation Project in accordance with the terms of the AHSC Documents and the approved design and construction documents and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Agency also shall, in its sole responsibility, convey to Developer sufficient site control to enable Developer to complete the Developer STI Improvements. The Developer shall, in its sole responsibility, complete the Housing Project in accordance with the terms of the AHSC Documents and the approved design and construction documents. The Developer also shall complete the Developer STI Improvements, contingent upon conveyance by the Agency to Developer sufficient site control for completion of the Developer STI Improvements. Each Party will provide the other Party with copies of all requisitions for work related to their respective work, the notice of completion, and other documents related to their respective work that another party may reasonably request. 2. Schedule of Performance; Progress Reports. Developer and Agency shall comply with the schedule of performance initially projected as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, but ultimately as shall be set forth in the AHSC Documents (the “Schedule of Performance”), provided, however, the Agency shall not be obligated to comply with any changes to the Schedule of Performance included within the AHSC Documents unless the Agency has consented to such changes, which Agency consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Agency and Developer agree to give the other Party a written quarterly status report on the progress toward the milestones and grant disbursement milestones listed in the Schedule of Performance for the Agency Obligations. If any Party anticipates not meeting the targeted construction milestones as established in the AHSC Documents, that Party will promptly notify the other Party in writing and will meet with the other Party to discuss the reasons why the milestone dates may not be met and what actions the delayed Party intends to take to meet the milestones or otherwise rectify the work schedule in order to maintain good standing with the terms and conditions established in the AHSC Documents. 3. Site Control. The Agency hereby represents and warrants that it possesses sufficient site control rights to fulfill its obligations in connection with the Transportation Property and the Developer STI Improvements. 4. Delegation. Notwithstanding the obligations of each Party under this Agreement, each Party shall be entitled to enter into sub-agreements with each other or with other parties to 398 6 144\324\3465950.7 provide any assistance or services needed for each Party to perform its obligations under this Agreement and the AHSC Documents. 5. Cost Overruns. Developer shall be responsible for paying all costs required to complete the Housing Project, irrespective of whether such costs exceeds the AHSC Loan. Developer shall be responsible for paying all costs required to complete the Developer STI Improvements, irrespective of whether such costs exceeds the AHSC Loan; provided however, that the Agency and not Developer shall be responsible for all costs of conveying to Developer site control sufficient for Developer to complete the Developer STI Improvements. Agency shall be responsible for paying all costs required for the Transportation Project, irrespective of whether such costs exceed the portion of the AHSC Grant actually awarded and designated for the Transportation Project. 6. Billing and Payment Procedure: The Agency shall submit to Developer all reimbursement requests in the form of monthly invoices for the costs associated with the Transportation Project. Invoices will include backup documentation as required by HCD. Developer shall submit corresponding reimbursement requests to HCD within 15 days of receipt of Agency’s invoice (or such later date as may be required by HCD, but in any event within 45 days after receipt of the Agency’s invoice) and disburse to the Agency any such funds received from HCD within 7 days of receipt. In no event will the Agency’s invoices submitted to Developer exceed in the aggregate the amount of the portion of the AHSC Grant actually awarded and designated for the Transportation Project. 7. Implementation Agreements. The Agency and the Developer recognize that each Party may need additional assurances from the other Party regarding the AHSC Grant and AHSC Loan before commencement of construction of the Housing Project and the Transportation Project, including assurances for lenders and investors. The Parties agree to cooperate with each other to reach mutual agreement on amendments to this Agreement, other implementation agreements or estoppel certificates necessary to provide reasonable assurances and indemnifications. Developer recognizes that any such amendments to this Agreement, other implementation agreements or estoppel certificates may require the approval of the governing body of the Agency. 8. Notices. Formal notices, demands, and communications between the parties shall be sufficiently given if, and shall not be deemed given unless, dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered by express delivery service, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, to the designated address of the Parties as follows: Agency: City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Franisco, CA 94080 ATTN: Economic & Community Development Housing 399 7 144\324\3465950.7 To Developer: Smitha Seshadri BRIDGE Housing Corporation 600 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94108 Fax: 415-495-4898 9. Events of Default. The occurrence of any of the following events shall constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement: (a) A Party fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, and does not cure such failure within 30 days after written notice of such failure has been delivered to the defaulting Party in accordance with Section 8 above; or (b) A Party purports to revoke this Agreement or this Agreement becomes ineffective for any reason. 10. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier of: (i) completion of all obligations under the AHSC Documents related to the Agency Obligations; or (ii) mutual agreement of the Parties hereto. 11. Third Party Beneficiary. The Partnership shall be a third party beneficiary of this Agreement and shall be entitled to the rights and benefits hereunder and may enforce the provisions hereof as if it were a party to this Agreement. 12. Assignment. Agency hereby acknowledges and approves the assignment by Developer and the Partnership to the Housing Project’s senior construction lender (“Construction Lender”) of all of their respective right, title and interest in, to and under the Agreement (the “Collateral”) as collateral security for the Partnership’s obligations to Construction Lender under, and in connection with Construction Lender’s loan to the Partnership. In the event Construction Lender forecloses upon the Collateral, Agency hereby agrees that Construction Lender shall have all of Developer’s and the Partnership’s rights and interests under the Agreement. Construction Lender shall be a third party beneficiary of this Section 12. 13. Indemnity. (a) Developer shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by Agency), and hold the Agency and its officers, directors, employees, agents, consultants (collectively, "Agency Indemnitees") harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, costs, damages, liability and judgments, including reasonable attorneys' fees (with counsel of Agency’s choice), incurred by or asserted against any Agency Indemnitees arising in connection with any breach by Developer, the Partnership, any affiliate of Developer, or any contractor, subcontractor, agent or employee of Developer, the Partnership or any affiliate of Developer of any term or condition of the AHSC Financing, including the AHSC Documents and any related documents executed by Developer, the Partnership, or any affiliate of Developer; provided, that Developer's indemnification obligations under this Agreement shall not extend to claims resulting solely from 400 8 144\324\3465950.7 the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Agency Indemnitees. It is further agreed that Agency does not and shall not waive any rights against Developer or the Partnership that it may have by reason of this indemnity and hold harmless agreement because of Agency’s acceptance, or Developer's or the Partnership's deposit with Agency of any of the insurance policies. (b) Agency shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by Developer), and hold the Developer, the Partnership and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, consultants and partiers (collectively, "Developer Indemnitees") harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, costs, damages, liability and judgments, including reasonable attorneys' fees (with counsel of Developer's choice), incurred by or asserted against any Developer Indemnitees arising in connection with any breach by Agency, or any division, department, office, contractor, subcontractor, agent or employee of Agency of any term or condition of the AHSC Financing, including the AHSC Documents, and any related documents executed by Agency; provided, that Agency’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement shall not extend to claims resulting solely from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Developer Indemnitees. It is further agreed that Developer does not and shall not waive any rights against Agency that it may have by reason of this indemnity and hold harmless agreement because of Developer's acceptance, or Agency’s deposit with Developer of any of the insurance policies. 14. Miscellaneous. (a) Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit any claim or right which any Party may otherwise have at any time against an Indemnitor or any other person arising from any source other than this Agreement, including any claim for fraud, misrepresentation, waste, or breach of contract other than this Agreement, and any rights of contribution or indemnity under any federal or state environmental law or any other applicable law, regulation, or ordinance. (b) If any Party delays in exercising or fails to exercise any right or remedy against a Party, that alone shall not be construed as a waiver of such right or remedy. All remedies of any Party against the other Party are cumulative. (c) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto and their respective representatives, heirs, executor, administrators, successors, and assigns. This Agreement may not be amended except by a written instrument executed by the Parties hereto. (d) This Agreement shall be deemed to have been delivered and accepted in the State of California and governed exclusively by the internal substantive laws of the State of California as the same may exist at the date hereof. The Parties hereto agree that any action hereon between the parties and their successors in interest may be maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction located in the State of California, and consent to the jurisdiction of any such California court for the purposes connected herewith. (e) Each Party hereto intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person other than the Parties hereto. 401 9 144\324\3465950.7 (f) This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterpart copies, any one of which when duly executed, with all formalities hereof, shall be fully binding and effective as the original of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed using electronic signatures and delivered via .pdf and shall be considered an original, and shall have the same legal effect, validity and enforceability as a paper record. For the avoidance of doubt, the authorization under this paragraph may include, without limitation, use or acceptance of manually signed paper documents which have been converted into electronic form (such as scanned into .pdf format), or an electronically signed documents converted into another format, for transmission, delivery and/or retention. (g) This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date, provided however that in the event that the Parties do not receive an award of the AHSC funds, this Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. [Signatures on following page] 402 Signature Page To AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement (1051 Mission Affordable) 144\324\3465950 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. AGENCY: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation By: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Its: ________________________________ [Signatures Continue on Following Page] 403 Signature Page To AHSC Implementation and Cooperation Agreement (1051 Mission Affordable) 144\324\3465950 DEVELOPER: BRIDGE Housing Corporation, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation By: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Its: ________________________________ 404 144\324\3465950.7 EXHIBIT A Schedule of Performance (1051 Mission Affordable AHSC) AGENCY: Agency STI Improvements Performance Milestone Date Begin construction September 1, 2023 Complete Agency STI Improvements February 1, 2024 All funds fully disbursed July 1, 2025 Agency TRA Improvements Performance Milestone Date Begin construction February 1, 2024 Complete construction August 1, 2024 All funds fully disbursed March 1, 2025 Note Agency performance milestone below regarding Agency site control obligation under Developer STI Improvements, below. DEVELOPER: Developer STI Improvements Performance Milestone Date Agency conveys site control to Developer June 1, 2024 Begin construction January 1, 2025 Complete Developer STI Improvements November 1, 2026 All funds fully disbursed December 1, 2028 Developer Housing Project Performance Milestone Date Execute Standard Agreement for AHSC Grants December 31, 2023 Execute Disbursement Agreement for AHSC Grants December 31, 2023 Begin construction of housing project January 1, 2025 Complete construction and obtain Certificate of Occupancy for the Housing Project June 1, 2027 405 144\324\3465950.7 All AHD funds fully disbursed December 31, 2028 [END OF EXHIBIT A] 406