Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-04-11 e-packet AGENDA ~EDEVELOPMENTAGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 2007 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopmtmt Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the: items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR. Chair PEDRO GONZALEZ Vice Chair MARK N. ADDIEGO Boardmember JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Boardmember KARYL MATSUMOTO Boardmember RICHARD BATTAGLIA Investment Officer BARRY M. NAGEL Executive Director STEVEN T. MATTAS Counsel PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of March 14, 2007 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of April 11, 2007 3. Motion to receive and accept the Annual Redevelopment Agency Reports, as required by Health and Safety Code section 33080.1 4. Resolution awarding the construction contract for the Lindenville Storm Drainage Pump Station Project, Project No. SS-05-2, Bid No. 2386 to JMB Construction, Inc. in the amount of$3,622,900 CLOSED SESSION 5. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to 356 Grand Avenue; Agency Negotiator: Assistant Director Van Duyn ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AGENDA April 11, 2007 PAGE 2 - ~~\\ sM (~.._o~:c:'"__ , ~ <"J V c C'4tIFO~~\.~ - Redevelopment Agency Staff Report RDAAGENDAITEM#3 DATE: Aprilll,2007 TO: Redevelopment Agency Board FROM: Marty VanDuyn, Assistant Executive Director SUBJECT: ANNUAL REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board recc~ive and accept the attached reports, as required by Health and Safety Code 33080.1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Califomia Health & Safety Code 33080.1 requires local agencies to produce and submit to its legislative body and the State Controller a series of annual reports related to the Redevelopment Agency's activities in the prior fiscal year. These reports have or will shortly be submitted to the State as required, but our extemal auditors have pointed out that the Board also needs to receive and review them. This Staff Report transmits the reports for fiscal year 2005-06. Several of these routine reports are primarily for demographic reporting to the State, are lengthy and contain very detailed numerical data. Consequently, they are not feasible to include here as Attachments. They can be viewed on the City's website in the Finance Department Homepage (www.ssf.net/depts/finance). or by contacting the Finance Department at (650) 877-8513. A binder will also be available in the Council office. The reports submitted annually to the State Controller's Office are listed here: Property Report Describes properties owned by the Agency, their uses, and those acquired in the previous fiscal year. (Exhibit A) Blight Progress Report Describes the Agency's progress in eliminating blight over the past year, including goals and objectives set and achieved. (Exhibit B) Annual Report of Financial Transactions of Community Redevelopment Agencies Presents detailed descriptions of the Agency's project areas and assessed valuations, including but not limited to, the Agency's long-term debt and statement of income and expenditures. (Not attached here, but available for viewing as described above) Staff Report Subject: Annual Redevelopment Reporting Requirements Page 2 Housing Activities Report Describes housing activities and funding sources and is required to be submitted to the State Office of Housing and Community Development by December 31 sl of each year. This HCD report is not attached here, but is available for viewing as deseribed on the previous page. A binder is available in the City Council office with this report. Loan Report Identifies loans which equal or exceed $50,000 and that were found by the Agency during the previous fiscal year to have either defaulted or not complied with the terms of the agreements approved by the Agency. The Agency did not have any such loans in fiscal year 2005/06, so this statement, in lieu of a report, will suffice for the reporting requirement. CONCLUSION: Acceptance of these reports will facilitate the Agency's compliance with the State Health and Safety Code. By: /J(9~ ~Q Marty Van Duyn Assistant Executive Director APProv~ .(W arry M. Nagel Executive Director Attachments: Attachment A Property Report Attachment B Blight Progress Report EXHIBIT A City of South San Francisco RDA Property List as of 6/30/06 Address 200 Linden Ave 432 Baden/429 Third Ln 616 Linden Ave 700 Linden 468 Miller Parking Lot 472 Grand/306 Spruce 905 Linden 212 Baden Giorgi Bldg 201 Grand Ave 339-341 Commercial 480 No Canal 312 Miller Ave. 310 Miller Ave. 713,714,715 Miller Ave 380 Alta Vista 440 Commerical Ave. 601 Gateway Blvd. Use Office building Parking lot Green spot Green spot Parking lot Medical Office Green spot Warehouse Parking lot Residential units Fire Station 61 Residential units Residential units Residential units Residential unit Residential units Childcare Program Net Book Value 535,000 336,229 341,016 317,006 111,219 1,579,729 507,269 942,083 564,000 804,086 5,007,603 717,183 586,309 750,000 683,080 416,058 1,257,668 15,455,538 Exhibit "B" Blight Progress Report Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco During fiscal year 2005-06 the Redevdopment Agency efforts have been focused on the alleviation of blight through the following activities: Infrastructure improvements to major thoroughfares and residential streets to capitalize on the opportunities resulting from the BART station development and to open additional area to development and redevelopment. Business attraction adivities to eliminate blighting conditions and provide additional employment opportunities for South San Francisco residents. Construction and rehabilitation of public facilities such as parks and recreational facilities. Redevelopment of existing vacant and underutilized land to eliminate blighting conditions and provide residents with additional housing, employment and recreational opportunities. Housing activities to provide new affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate income families and to improve the City's existing housing stock. Specific projects undertaken include but are not limited to the following: Initiation of construction for 43 affordable rental units at Grand and Oak Avenues. Street improvements to the El Camino Corridor in the vicinity of the BART station. Initiation of construction for four home owner units by Habitat for Humanity. Renovations funds for Safe Harbor Homeless Shelter. Acquisition and rehabilitation of three units of affordable housing. Provision of 21 units of affordable for sale town homes at the City Lights project. Continuation of rehabilitation loan program for low and moderate income homeowners. Redevelopment Agency Staff Report RDA AGENDA ITEM # 4 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 11, 2007 Redevelopment Agency Board Marty VanDuyn, Assistant Executive Director LINDENVILLE STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION PROJECT PROJECT NO. SS-OS..2, BID NO. 2386 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a resolution awarding the construction contract for the Lindenville Storm Drainage Pump Station Project, Project No. SS-05-2, Bid No. 2386 to JMB Construction, Inc. of South San Francisco, CA in the amount of $3,622,900.00. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION This project is located at 27 South Linden Avenue with the first phase of construction to address the potential flooding in the LindenviUe area (Victory Avenue, South Maple A venue, South Linden Avenue, South Canal Street and Starlite Street). The project involves the construction of a new concrete storm drainage pump station, partial site clean-up of contaminated soil, installation of new electrical equipment and equipment pads for the pump station, and installation of a new emergency generator. On February 1,2007 and on February 12, 2007, staff advertised the notice inviting sealed bids for this project. Staff opened bids on AprilS., 2007 and eight (8) bids were received. The 10w bidder is JMB Construction, Inc. of South San Francisco. Below is the summary of the base bids: Engineer's Estimate: Bids: JMB Construction Inc. of South San Francisco Anderson Pacific Eng. Const. Inc. Proven Management Inc. of San Francisco McGuire & Hester of Oakland Mountain Cascade Inc. of Livermore Mitchell Engineering of San Francisco Valentine Corporation of San Rafael NTK Construction, Inc of San Francisco $4,513,970.00 $3,622,900.00 $4,118,150.00 $4,370,592.00 $4,431,170.00 $4,449,150.00 $4,595,600.00 $4,723,369.00 $4,904,200.00 Staff Report Subject: LINDENVILLE STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION PROJECT Page 2 of2 Staff verified the low bidder's current contractor's license with the California State Licensing Board to be of good standing, and confirmed their references for past construction proj ects similar to the subject project. The second phase of this project will construct upgrades to the existing storm drainage lines on Victory Avenue, South Linden Avenue, South Maple Avenue, and South Canal Street. Work for the second phase is scheduled for bid advertisement in the Fall of 2007. FUNDING Shown below is the cost breakdown for the project budget: JMB Construction Inc. Bid Amount Harris & Associates Construction Management DTSC Oversight Fee (Estimated) Carollo Engineers Construction Support Fee CH2MHill Construction Monitoring (for DTSC) Add Contingency (15%) Add Construction Administration Total Project Budget Cost $3,622,900.00 $ 425,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 550,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $4,997,900.00 The project is included in the City of South San Francisco's 2006-2007 CIP. Sufficient Redevelopment Bond funds were budgeted to cover the project costs. CONCLUSION Approval ofthis project will allow the construction of a new storm drainage pump station that will eliminate the flooding in the Lindenville area. ;UWM arty VanDuyn Assistant Executive Director RR/rc Attachment: Resolution Bid Summary RESOLUTION NO. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR LINDENVILLE STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION PROJECT TO JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE AMOUNT OF $3,622,900.00 WHEREAS, on February 1, 2007 and February 12, 2007, staff advertised the notice to invite sealed bids for the proj ect; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2007, staff opened bids and eight bids were received, and the lowest bidder was JMB Construction, Inc. :Dor the amount of $3,622,900.00; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency award the construction contract to JMB Construction, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $3,622,900.00; and WHEREAS, project is included in the City of South San Francisco's 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Program. Sufficient Redevelopment Bond funds were budgeted to cover the project cost; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco that the Agency hereby awards the construction contract for the Lindenville Storm Drainage Pump Station to JMB Construction, Inc. in the amount of $3,622,900.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf ofthe Redevelopment Agency ofthe City of South San Francisco, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of , 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk H:\CIT'l' PROJECTS\$S-oS-2 indenv\le PS & Storm Dr,lin Upgrade Project .0455\07 0403_Bid Summaryl.xb 10 Estimated Total Demobilization All work required to construct and install the L1ndenville Stann Drainage Pump Station, complete per plans and specifications Cost LS 35,000.00 $ S 35,000.00 4,513,970.00 10,000.00 $ S 10,000.00 I $ 3,622,900.00 50,000.00 $ $ 150,000.00 4,118,150.00 35,000.00 $ S 135,000.00 4,370,592.00 9 LS $ 3,525,500.00 $ 3,525,500.00 2,593,000.00 2,593,000.00 $ 2,825,000.00 2,825,000.00 2,824,802.00 2,824,802.00 Disposal of all other soil at an acceptable landfill 200 CY $ 50.00 10,000.00 42.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 45.00 9,000.00 $ 4500 9,000.00 Disposal of soil meeting the definition ot a California hazardous waste at an acceptable landfill (COMP-3) Disposal of soil meeting the definition of a RCRA hazardous waste requiring solidification/stabilization at an acceptable landfill (COMP-2) 2,140 CY 195.00 417,300.00 $ 128.00 $ 273,920.00 $ 45.00 310,300.00 $ 25.00 $ 287,500.00 8 390 CY 410.00 59,900.00 260.00 $ 101,400.00 300.00 7,000.00 255.00 99,450.00 5 Disposal of soil meeting the definition of a Class II non- hazardous soil at an acceptable landfill (COMP-1) 870 CY $ 81.00 54,270.00 $ 54.00 36,180.00 55.00 36,850.00 $ 2 3 4 Sheeting, Shoring & Bracing Installation of Power Cable and Conduits designated PG&E facilities Excavation, Handling, and storage of potentially contaminated soil 1 200 1 LS $ $ $ $ 20,000.00 120,000.00 $ 210,000.00 210,000.00 70,000.00 $ 170,000.00 LS LS LF 35.00 7,000.00 75.00 5,000.00 00.00 20,000.00 to conned to 10,000.00 10,000.00 25,000.00 125,000.00 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ $ $ $ 52.00 34,840.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 $ 40,00000 200.00 Mobilization 75,000.00 75,000.00 150,000.00 50,000.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 400,000.00 210,000.00 400,000.00 210,000.00 Item No. Bid Item Description Bidders Name Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Engineer's Estimate Total Estimated Price Unit Price JMB Construction Inc. of South San Francisco, CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price Anderson Pacific Engineering & Construction, Inc. of Santa Clara, CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price Proven Management Inc. of San Francisco. CA Total Estimated Price Bid Opened by: Raul Dacanay Witnessed by: Rosalie Calvo Date: April 5, 2007 City of South San Francisco Lindenville Storm Drainage Pump Station Bid No. 2386 H:ICITY PROJECTS\SS-05-2 Eslimated Total indenv~" PS & storm Drain Upglade Project to455\07 040J_Bid Sl.lrf\rll;;l.r)'l.x1s Cost $ $ 33,000.00 4,431,170.00 10 Demobilization All work required to construct and install the Lindenville Stann Drainage Pump Station, complete per plans and specifications 33,000.00 50,000.00 $ $ 4,449,150.00 50,000.00 38,000.00 $ $ 38,000.00 4,595,600.00 $ 4,000.00 $ S 14,000.00 4,723,369.00 148,000.00 $ $ 148,000.00 4,904,200,00 $ 2,958,600.00 2,958,600.00 $ 3,21 ,000.00 3,21 ,000.00 2,766,000.00 2,766,000.00 $ 3,143,560.00 I $ 3,143,560.00 $ 3,071,300.00 $ 3,071,300.00 Disposal of all other soil at an acceptable landfill 75.00 $ 5,000.00 40.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 35.00 7,000.00 27.00 5,400.00 00.00 20,000.00 Disposal of soil meeting the definition of a California hazardous waste at an acceptable landfill (COMP-3) Disposal of soil meeting the definition of a RCRA hazardous waste requiring solidification/stabilization at an acceptable landfill (COMP-2) 58.00 338,120.00 140.00 299,600.00 50.00 321,000.00 $ 147.00 I $ 314,580.00 $ 125.00 $ 267,500.00 6 355.00 38,450.00 $ 300.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 90.00 74,100.00 $ 301.00 7,390.00 245.00 95,550.00 Disposal of soil meeting the definition of a Class II non- hazardous soil at an acceptable landfill (COMP-l) $ 00.00 $ 67,000.00 65.00 43,550.00 $ 50.00 33,500.00 $ 61.00 40,870.00 $ 55.00 36,850.00 Sheetin9, Shoring & Bracing Installation of Power Cable and Conduits designated PG&E facilities Excavation, Handling, and storage of potentially contaminated soil 258,000.00 258,000.00 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 255,369.00 255,36900 I $ to connect to 165.00 33,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 20,000.00 130.00 26,000.00 161.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 290,000.00 I $ 290,00000 I $ 200,00000 $ 200,000.00 750,000.00 $ 750,000.00 32,200.00 $ 00.00 20,000.00 Mobilization 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 I $ 50,000.00 50,000.00 230,000.00 230,000.00 $ 500,000.00 200,000.00 500,000.00 200,000.00 $ 850,000.00 245,000.00 850,00000 245,000.00 Item No. Bid Bidders Name em Description Unit Price McGuire & Hester, Inc. of Oakland, CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price Mountain Cascade, loc of Livermore) CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price Mitchell Engineering of San Francisco, CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price Valentine Corporation of San Rafael, CA Total Estimated Price Unit Price NTK Construction, Inc. of San Francisco CA Total Estimated Price Bid Opened by: Raul Dacanay Witnessed by: Rosalie Calvo Date: April 5, 2007 City of South San Francisco Lindenville Storm Drainage Pump Station Bid No. 2386 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11,2007 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.rn. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. Califomia law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR Mayor PEDRO GONZALEZ Vice Mayor MARK N. ADDIEGO Councilman JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Councilman KARYLMATSUMOTO Councilwoman RICHARD BATTAGLIA City Treasurer BARRY M. NAGEL City Manager STEVEN T. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMP AIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCA nON PRESENT A nONS . Proclamation: National Library Week, April 15-21, 2007; Recipient: Library Board President Eieanor Breite . Certificates of Recognition - South San Francisco Unified School District and South San Francisco Senior Citizen Second Annual Spelling Bee Winners, Georgiana Du, Fifth Grade Winner, and Mr. Mike Lombardo, Senior Citizen Winner . "Every Fifteen Minutes Program" two-day seminar at El Camino High School- Police Chief Raffaelli and Police Corporal Doug Smith AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL . Announcements . Committee Reports . Resolution endorsing the adoption of the "Socially Responsible Contractor's Code of Conduct" CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of March 14,21, and 28,2007 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of April 11, 2007 3. Resolution accepting a donation from Genentech in the amount of$10,000 to apply towards the 2006-07 Fire Prevention Week Program 4. Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. to perform a feasibility study and cost analysis for the high intensity redevelopment concept plan for the Oyster Point Marina 5. Motion to accept the petition for annexation of 515 Airport Boulevard (APN 012-177-030) into Parking District #1 and to forward it to the Parking Place Commission for consideration 6. Consideration of options to preserve below market rate units within South City Lights development project (formerly the Marbella Project) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA April II, 2007 PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING 7. Consideration of resolution authorizing submittal of one year action plan and statement of obj ectives and proj ected use of funds for the Community Development Block Grant Program for Fiscal Year 2007-08; authorizing a budget transfer to incorporate CDBG and HOME funds into the 2007-08 operating budget; and authorizing the execution and submittal of all documents to the Department of Housing and Urban Development that are required to secure and allocate federal CDBG funds (public hearing continued from February 28,2007 and March 28,2007) COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM, ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA April 11, 2007 PAGE 3 Resolution to Support a Socially Responsible Contractor's "CODE OF CONDUCT" WHEREAS, as the duly elected City Council of South San Francisco, we care deeply about the rights and well being of all residents of our city, as well as those who work within it; WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated in several studies of low wage workers that residents of our community are suffering economically and socially due to the conditions of their employment and we are therefore troubled that many of these low wage workers are employed at the sites of the wealthiest companies in the world: the High-Tech and Bio-Tech Corridor running from South San Francisco to San Jose; WHEREAS, many workers in this "corridor" are employed by Food Service subcontractors; who earn, on average, 69% less than the median income for this area and are unable to meet the basic needs for themselves and their children despite being employed full time; WHEREAS, these same subcontracted workers, such as food service workers, are often forced to rely upon government subsidies because their employers often do not provide access to affordable health care and a sustainable wage; WHEREAS because subcontractors and their client companies often shift the responsibility for the workers' (and their families) right to health care from the company to the public tax payers, these subcontractors thereby increase their profit margin at the expense of our neighbors and our State budget; WHEREAS, many subcontracted Food Service workers and other servIce workers are hard working immigrants and often suffer disrespectful treatment on the job; WHEREAS we members of the South San Francisco City Council reaffirm our commitment to protect a decent standard of living for all our residents and people who work within our community, and that we believe strongly that all workers have the right of respect and dignity at work; WHEREAS, in many ways, we are a community which has benefited greatly from the new economy of Bio-Tech and High-Tech industries; * * * * * THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT WE WHOLEHEARTEDLY ENDORSE THE "SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTOR CODE OF CONDUCT." FURTHERMORE, WE LOOK TO BIO-TECH AND HIGH-TECH COMPANIES TO SHOW LEADERSHIP IN THEIR CONTRACTING POLICIES JUST AS THEY HAVE SHOWN LEADERSHIP IN THEIR TREATMENT OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT WE URGE ALL COMPANIES UTILIZING CONTRACTORS TO ADOPT THIS SPECIFIC "CODE OF CONDUCT" AND CEASE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS WITH ANY COMPANY UNWILLING TO ADHERE TO THIS CODE AS STATED. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 11 th day of April 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk AGENDA ITEM # 3 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 11, 2007 Honorable Mayor and City Council Philip D. White, Fire Chief ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION FROM GENENTECH AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR USE AS PART OF THE 2006-2007 FIRE PREVENTION WEEK PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution accepting a donation in the amount of $10,000.00 to apply towards the Fire Prevention Week program. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Genentech has donated a total of$10,,000.00 to the Fire Department, to be applied toward the costs incurred for the 2006-2007 Fire Prevention Week program. FUNDING Funding from Genentech will be combined with other donations to offset the cost of items purchased. This funding does not create any ongoing financial obligation for the City of South San Francisco. By: J AB-03/22/07 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION FROM GENENTECH AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR USE AS PART OF THE 2006-2007 FIRE PREVENTION \VEEK PROGRAM WHEREAS, staff recommends the acceptance ofa donation in the amount of $10,000.00 from Genentech to the Fire Department Budget for use as part of the 2006-2007 Fire Prevention Week Program; and WHEREAS, the funds will be combined with other donation funds as necessary for the purchase of appropriate items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes acceptance of the donation from Genentech to add to the Fire Department budget. * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the_ day of , 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk C: \Documents and Senings\tronzani \Local Senings \ Temporary Internet Files \OLK24 \reso accepting Genentech Donation.DOC ~ ~ . ~~\ (~ ~ ~ ~ v c "<IIFO""\~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 4 DATE: April 11, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: OYSTER POINT MASTER PLAN - CONSULTING SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND COST ESTIMATES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Kleinfelder to perform a feasibility study and cost analysis for the high intensity redevelopment concept plan created by ROMA Design Group for the Oyster Point Marina. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Last Fall the City's consultant, ROMA Design Group, presented a draft of the Oyster Point Concept Plan to the City Council. At that meeting, Council questioned the feasibility of constructing a convention center and hotels on the Oyster Point Marina property, which is a closed landfill site. Specifically, the feasibility and order of magnitude costs of construction on the site were in question. Council directed staff to solicit consulting services to determine if the high intensity option was in fact feasible. In late 2006 staff sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP) to three consulting firms. At that time, all firms were at their work capacity and could not respond to the RFP. On January 22, 2007 staff sent an RFP to five firms and we received two proposals: one from Kleinfelder and the other from Terra Engineers, Inc. (partnering with PES Environmental). Both proposals focus on the geotechnical, environmental and potential regulatory hurdles associated with redevelopment of the closed landfill site. The consulting fees proposed by Kleinfelder and Terra Engineers, Inc. are $46,000 and $36,500 respectively. There are two significant differences between the proposals: the level of detail in the scope of work; and the amount of landfill redevelopment experience. The scope of work presented by both firn1s was reviewed by City staff from Engineering, Planning and Public Works Divisions. Kleinfelder's scope of work has been found most responsive to the City's needs based on the tasks they proposed as well as the level of detail they provided. Further, Kleinfelder has substantially more landfill redevelopment experience, including a number oflocal projects such as Sierra Point Landfill in Brisbane, Half Moon Bay Landfill, and the Bayview Business Park in San Rafael. FUNDING The Planning Division's Professional and Specialized Services Budget will be the funding source for this Staff Report Subject: Oyster Point Feasibility Study - Consulting Services Contract Page 2 of3 consulting services contract. As stated earlier, the proposed budget for the project is $46,000. CONCLUSION As the next step in the concept planning of the Oyster Point Marina area, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute a consulting services contract with Kleinfelder to perform a feasibility study and order of magnitude cost analysis for the high intensity redevelopment concept put forward by ROMA Design Group for the Oyster Point Marina. JJ~~ By: ~ ~,C - - - _ Nagel City Manager Marty VanDuyn Assistant City Manager Attachment: Draft Resolution Kleinfelder Scope of Work BMN/MVD/gb RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSULTANT CONTRACT WITH KLEINFELDER, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY AND COST ESTIMATE FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF THE OYSTER POINT MARINA PROPERTY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $46,000. WHEREAS, staff has determined that as part of the high intensity redevelopment plan of the Oyster Point Marina, there is a need for preparation of a feasibility study and cost estimate; and WHEREAS, on January 22,2007, staff issued requests for proposals to five firms; and WHEREAS, based on its level of detail in the scope of work and the amount of landfill redevelopment experience, staff recommends that Kleinfelder, Inc. prepare the Feasibility Study and Cost Estimates; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby awards the contract for Preparation of a Feasibility Study and Cost Estimate for Redevelopment of the Oyster Point Marina to K1einfelder, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $46,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the contract on behalf of the City of South San Francisco. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a public meeting held on the 11 th day of April, 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk SCOPE OF WORK To facilitate a clear understanding, we have divided the scope of work into Geotechnical and Environmental aspects. The scope of work is to provide a feasibility and rough cost estimate for these aspects. Specific design details and recommendations are not part of this current scope. Our scope of work is presented below. GEOTECHNICAL . Review available geotechnical and geological data pertaining to the project site vicinity, including technical information in our files, regarding long and short-term settlement analyses and foundation support. . Periorm a site visit to assess current conditions. . Produce an estimated typical landfill subsuriace profile to assist in evaluating future settlement and possible foundation types. . Provide settlement estimates for the landfill that will enable evaluation of site impacts due to changes in development schemes and locations. . Evaluate foundation system alternatives, including deep foundations, shallow foundations such as a continuous spread footings or mats, and ground improvement. . Discuss landfill related design impacts, such as approach slabs, perimeter cut-off walls, roadway stabilization, utility excavations and building connections. . Provide preliminary cost estimates for geotechnical aspects of the project such as pile foundation costs, landfill related improvements, long-term operation and maintenance cost estimates and plans, and stabilization. . Provide regulatory support and negotiations services. . Prepare an administrative draft, a draft report, and a final report with geotechnical feasibility evaluations, which will be combined with environmental input. . Meet with the City at the beginning of the project, and after issuance of the administrative draft (prior to preparation of the draft report). We anticipate additional meetings may be needed, but the number is unknown. These additional meetings will be periormed at a time-and-materials cost. · Attend two public meetings. PB0620 (BAR7P002) Page 6 of 8 February, 13, 2007 KLEINFELDER, INC. 7133 KolI Center Parkway, Suite 100, Pleasanton CA 94566 (925) 484-1700 (925) 484-5838 fax www.kleinfelder.com ENVIRONMENT AL . Review the technical information related to environmental requirements, including the Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan, and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Monitoring Plan for the Oyster Point Landfill. Evaluate possible landfill gas mitigation system components, including liner, venting (passive or active), monitoring, reporting, and permitting. Evaluate possible utility connections, including trenching details and flexible connections. Evaluate the need for on-site waste relocation and/or removal. Evaluate the need for construction mitigation plans. Evaluate the requirements for a protective soil layer during construction, and for a final vegetative layer. Discuss landscaping and irrigation as it related to the final cover system. Discuss impacts to leachate management systems and need for modifications. Discuss groundwater monitoring requirements and possible changes related to site development. Recommend soil management procedures to deal with issues of worker protection during excavation and management of impacted soil. Evaluate air permit requirements for open excavations. Evaluate air permit requirements for active ventilation systems (a new regulatory enforcement issue). Evaluate other impacts related to construction/development, including piles thru the cap, settlement, hazardous environments, and contingency plans, etc. Provide recommendations on coordination between the design team, construction contractors, and regulators. Provide approximate costs for environmental-related aspects of the project, such as on- site waste relocation and/or removal, landfill gas mitigation, long-term operation and maintenance plans, permitting, monitoring and reporting. Provide regulatory support and negotiation services. Prepare written sections for inclusion in our geotechnical and environmental feasibility analysis report, assuming an initial administrative draft, one draft report, and a final report. Attend two public meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~.I Staff Report C'4l1FO'P-~\.~ AGENDA ITEM # 5 DATE: April 11, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Petition to Annex into Parking District 1 - Poletti Property, 515 Airport Boulevard (Assessor's Parcel No. 012-177-030) Applicant: Louis, Natalia and Richard Poletti RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the petition for annexation into Parking District #1 and forward it to the Parking Place Commission for consideration. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: A petition has been submitted by the Poletti family, owners of a parcel at 515 Airport Boulevard, to annex their property into the Downtown Parking District. The property is located approximately 75 feet north ofthe existing District boundary, as shown on the attached map. The 500 block of Airport Boulevard is characterized by older, quasi-industrial buildings with limited or no off-street parking, and metered parking along Cypress and Lux Avenues. City policies support conversion of these sites to commercial or mixed commercial/residential use, but the ability to realize this change without demolition of the existing buildings is restricted by the City's off-street parking requirements. Inclusion in the Parking District affords a property owner the opportunity to apply to the Downtown Parking Commission for consideration of an exception to the standard parking requirements based on a finding that there is sufficient public parking in the vicinity to meet all or a portion of the required on-site parking. Although staff s preference would be to expand the District boundary to encompass all five properties along the block, the agreement of the affected property owner is needed. Letters have been sent to the neighboring owners to solicit their interest in also joining the District, but so far none of the owners has responded. The necessary steps for expanding the Parking District are as follows: 1. Owner files a petition with the City Council. 2. Council accepts the petition and recommends an annexation fee (if any) to be paid by the property owner seeking inclusion. Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council RE: Parking District Annexation Petition Date: April 11, 2007 Page 2 3. City Council forwards petition and fee (if required) to Parking Place Commission for its review and determination. 4. Parking Place Commission approves or denies the petition, and approves or denies the City Council's recommendation regarding any annexation fee. 5. After approval by the Commission, the City Council may grant the petition. 6. Property is then added to the District when the annexation fee, if any, is paid. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, accept the subject petition and refer the matter to the Parking Place Commission for further action. Staff is not recommending an annexation fee at this time. By:h~ \)ti<1arty VanDuyn, ~ Assistant City Manager BMN :MVD:sk Approve ATTACHMENTS: Downtown Parking District Map Petition ...... u -- I- ...... tn -- C C) c: -- ~ l- ns D.. c: ~ o ...... c: ~ o C c ns 0- >< CI) - o ..J C) (1)C ~.- ~ .a~ ~ ~D.. nITJ PJel\alnoa ~ ~JOdJl'" I 1 I I I I I I I I~\IJIII 'U17J I 1 I I L-I I ~ '----:r : f::I onUOA", .....d~:> :::::=1 rJ I I J :11 -:::=J ~ ~ J ~_ -~-" -- i:=. " i==- =Hl ~ J-j -Illll I EN ;:=' F- j= -~~~~ l_uL8c::: - -I ~_ ~onu"^", ~ G:'"' - I , _ ~ -, In ~ hi-j r r-- f:::::: ~ ~= f - _ - =---< .. '" - " " - - i---- d :!_-~=- __ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 1B ~- ~ J i= ~ ! I - ----' t--i 'tl ------' r= -1== r- - <= >---- r- _ f-- M -I r- -.- ,.1 'i'- --,- - · L..L Oldew - ::] r:::=:1---,- J onuaA". - "TT1 r I L--1 r-- ~ '---,j n >:: -II = -1M _ f- /l~=------Ir ~ OJ 'ill ~I ----' It==: > !I ---1 ~ I ... ~ l-----::j IF C3 08,= r- ---'" e _ I-.:J ~ I ~[ ~ ..J ~ J<= _ E j ---1 a= 8;=- ~ ~ ~ ---=HJ ~'F ] ~ ~ ---< I -r ---1 m J3p ~ : --l I f-Ls ' i::=j ~ --1 I = I] I~ onuo?', ~ J ~ = ~ D 'L II----=f- _ --:J ~ ~ l== ,----= ~ r ~ [ ~ I L ----l ~"==i L-- ~ I PETITION TO INCLUDE PROPERTY IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PARKING DISTRICT NO.1 The undersigned does/do hereby petition the City of South San Francisco to include the real property located at 515 Airport Boulevard , South San Francisco, State of California, in the Parking District Number 1 operated by the City of South San Francisco. WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco operates Parking District Number 1 within I the boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, Owner(s) is/are the owner(s) oheal property located at 515 Airport Boulevard , South San Francisco, State of California, identified on the assessor's map of the County of San Mateo as parcel number 012-177,...030 WHEREAS, the Owner(s) desire/desires to include the property in the Parking District . - ~ _. -. Number 1; and WHEREAS, Owner(s) haslhave authorized filing this Petition; and, WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code section 35708 requires the owner(s) of real property to petition the local governing body to include the property in the parking district; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Owner(s) hereby petitions the City of South San Francisco to include the property located at 515 Airport Boulevard. SSF in Parking District Number 1. Respectfully sUbmitted. by: 12. --f / . ,A ~. --'"- ,.! A V"':'} 'Jv Ue Cottt'l Own~r(s)LOUIS JC/POLETTI. TRUSTEE Dated: .3 -,X I - 0 ry , Dated: .,3-;;) J -07 ""') ""':)' /",7 Dated: ,j'~ L {- v_ T \[) - """" '3/1'\1 S<;3Cld).) OfS,JL'3AV S'S'3~d).,J lIS ~ -+ ."I;H co ~ Sf 10'''' Ic>~~ 'f-------' 25' : fO f_{. "I i I I. j-!} j'::" g -.. ~ '<!'" ~ N ~ 4<;1 c L 1 'lJ - .l V \1'1 '" + -+- '" 'Z -L ~ _. I.!.~. ~.I. b.~.~~_ 50' -l 5/5 AIRPORT BlVb. ~'t\\ sM S !<. . ~~\ (0 ('l >-0 .... ~ ~ v c ~llFO~\~ Staff ReQort DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 6 April 11, 2007 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager Preservation of Below Market Rate (BMR) Units Constructed as Part of City Lights (formerly Marbella). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Manager to take action to preserve affordable housing within the City Lights (formerly Marbella) project. Staff recommends Option 3, described in more detail below, which would authorize the City Manager to negotiate Below Market Rate (BMR) unit trades with the developer to lower the cost of a portion of moderate-income units by releasing others from price restrictions. Depending on the direction from Council and subsequent negotiation and analysis, additional formal action may be necessary to effectuate the Council's direction. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On January 9, 2002, the City Council adopted ordinance 1306-2002 approving a development agreement for the Marbella Housing Development, which is now known as City Lights. As part of the development agreement, the developer agreed to provide 70 Below Market Rate (BMR) Units affordable to families of low-, median-, and moderate-incomes. The City Council approved this project before it adopted the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance which set specific guidelines and requirements for the provision and price of BMR units in subsequent housing developments. Watt Communities, the project's developer, has completed two buildings at City Lights. This has resulted in the availability of24 BMR units. The table below categorizes the number ofBMR units available in the fist two buildings by bedroom size and affordability level (sales price in parentheses). Size 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Low-Income 2 Units ($265,111) 4 Units ($344,556) 4 Units ($392,070) Med-Income 1 Unit ($280,912) 4 Units ($364,308) 2 Units ($4l4,345) Mod-Income 1 Unit ($346,760) 4 Units ($446,585) 2 Units ($506,479) All of the low- and median-income units have sold (one low-income unit is still in contract and scheduled to close soon). However, only two of the moderate-income units have sold. Although we have' a significant number of potential buyers for the moderate-income units, the buyers are realizing they have better alternatives and in all but two cases have backed out of the program. These moderate-income buyers are realizing it is not in their interest to purchase BMR units that Staff Report Subject: Preservation ofBMR Units at City Lights Page 2 cost slightly less than market rate housing elsewhere. Furthermore, the buyers determined that the full appreciation value of the BMR units cannot be realized since they will be price restricted when they are resold. The BMR units in the first two buildings were available for occupancy in January of2007. Under the terms of the development agreement, they will be returned to the developer to be sold as market rate units if they are not sold by the end of June 2007. Although efforts to find potential buyers for the moderate-income units continue, it is becoming clear they are priced too high to be attractive as BMR units for moderate-income buyers. Consequently, there is a substantial risk that the units will be 10st from the City's BMR inventory. The table below outlines four options for avoiding the potential loss of the five moderate-income units currently available as well as the additional 14 moderate-income units that will be available later this year at City Lights. Option City Cost 1) Purchase unsold units . $8.5 Million (assuming no others units sell) . $346,760 to $506,479 per unit . A portion of funds would be recouped after units are resold or rented 2) "Buy down" the price from . $1.6 Million moderate to median-income levels . $66,000 to $92,000 per unit . No funds will be recaptured 3) Trade units with developer (release a . $0 certain number of units to be sold at . A variety of possible trade scenarios exist. The market rate) for deeper affordability most likely scenario is that the City will have to in remaining units make one-for-one trades, i.e. release one unit's restrictions in exchange for making a similar unit affordable to low- or median-income buyers 4) Continue trying to sell units until . $0 affordability restriction ends . Risk losing a substantial number of BMR unit inventory It should be noted that with the adoption of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, the City will not face similar pricing problems in future housing developments. The issue of selling moderate- income BMR units is unique to this housing developmentwhere the units priced for the moderate- income market compete for buyers with more competitive alternatives. FUNDING City Council approval of the recommendation to proceed with Option 3, trading units, involves no funding commitment. If the City Council instead elects to pursue Options 1 or 2, funding would come from the Redevelopment Agency's Housing Set-Aside funds. No City funds would be used for Option 4. Staff Report Subject: Preservation of BMR Units at City Lights Page 3 CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Manager to take one of the actions described above to preserve the moderate-income units provided as part of the City Lights project. Staff recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate unit trades with Wart Communities to lower the cost of some BMR units by releasing others from price restrictions (Option 3). Option 3 represents the City's most cost effective option and allows it to retain a minimum of nine to ten BMR units in the program. The City Manager will only pursue unit trades when it becomes evident no buyers exist for moderate-income units and the units are at risk of being lost from the BMR inventory. If the Council prefers one of the other options listed above, or identifies additional options, it should provide direction .consistent with that preference. Depending on the direction from Council and subsequent negotiation and analysis, additional formal action may be necessary to effectuate the Council's direction. By: ~A/ ~"t;~ r /MartyVan Duyn Assistant City Manager Approved: - ~~\\ S,4N ~& I~ c \~ ~ v c ~l~~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 7 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 11, 2007 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN AND STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing submittal of the City's One Year Action Plan and Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and all required documents to the Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing a budget transfer to iD.corporate the CDBG and HOME funds into the 2007-08 operating budget; and authorizing the City Manger to execute all documents necessary to secure and award CDBG, HOME Administrative and Redevelopment funds for the City. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION This is the final required public hearing regarding funding allocations for the 2007-08 Community Development Block Grant Program. The purpose is to obtain public comments regarding the proposed One Year Action Plan for 2007-08; including the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Program. Notice ofthis public hearing was published in the San Mateo Times on March 30, 2007 as required by federal regulations. In addition, notices were sent to all community organizations that have submitted applications for funding. Availability of the One Year Action Plan for FY 2007-08 was also published in the San Mateo Times on March 10, 2007. The CDBG Entitlement amount for next fiscal year is $616,661. Additionally, the City expects to receive $100,000 in program income from CDBG rehabilitation 10an repayments and use $200,000 in carryover funds from prior years' program income and cancelled projects. Thus, the total amount of funds available to allocate in FY 2007-08 will be $916,661. There is a federal spending limit for public service activities of fifteen percent (15%) ofthe entitlement amount pIus fifteen percent of the program income. Therefore, a total of $107,499 may be allocated for public service activities. Program administration also has a spending limit of twenty percent (20%) of the entitlement pIus twenty percent (20%) of program income. Therefore $143,332 will be allocated to program administration. Staff Report Subject: One Year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant Program Page 2 CDBG SUBCOMMITTEE PRELIMINARY FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS: The CDBG Subcommittee reviewed applications for funding, individual agency program accomplishments and general parameters and priorities for funding based on an assessment of the most critical community needs. Those critical needs were established by City Council in the City's Five Year Consolidated Housing, Economic and Community Development Plan, which covers FY2003-08 and was adopted in 2003. The proposed 2007-08 Annual Plan is the fifth year of the Five Year Plan. The attached spreadsheet labeled Exhibit "A", Community Development Block Grant Funding Recommendations Fiscal Year 2007-08, provides the allocation amounts proposed by the CDBG subcommittee for each agency or project. Please refer to the numeric column on the right side of the spreadsheet, for the funding proposed for each CDBG applicant. The proposed funding allocations were published in the San Mateo Times on March 30, 2007. This evening, City Council has the opportunity to revise the funding levels at its discretion or accept the CDBG Subcommittee recommendations, in whole or in part. The Subcommittee was required to recommend reduced funding by $3,751 for social service activities from last year's funding level based on the cut in the City's Entitlement amount. Eleven agencies submitting proposals were funded at the same level as 2006-07 and three programs were recommended for reduced funding: Tooth Mobile ($2,000 less), Parca ($1,000 less), and City Sponsored Child Care ($7511ess). FUNDING This year, the HOME Investment Partnership Program provided the City with administrative funds in the amount of$16,674. HOME funds are usually allocated to undertake fair housing activities as designated by the City Council. Project Sentinel and La Raza Centro Legal provide fair housing services for City residents. This year the amount of funds available to the City was reduced by $1,145. The CDBG Subcommittee is recommending $4,000 for Project Sentinel and $12,674 for La Raza Centro Legal. These HOME Administrative funds will be incorporated into the CDBG budget by City Council action this evening, allowing them to be received and expended in 2007-08. In order to maximize the use of CDBG funds, the City has traditionally allocated Redevelopment Agency Housing Fund dollars to housing related activities such as emergency shelter programs carried out by community agencies. Requests for Proposals are received via the CDBG process and those funds are made available to specific projects that qualify as redevelopment eligibility requirements. The Redevelopment Agency has funded Family Crossroads and Maple Street Shelters, operated by Shelter Network, Sitike Counseling Center and La Raza Centro Legal's Code Enforcement Program. It is recommended that redevelopment funds continue to be allocated for these agencies to continue their housing efforts with homeless and at risk individuals and families. The Redevelopment Agency Funds will also be authorized for expenditure in fiscal year 2007-08 by City Council action this evening. S taft' Report Subject: One Year Action PIan for Community Development Block Grant Program Page 3 CONCLUSION The deadline for submitting the One Year Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2007-08 is May 1, 2007. Submittal of this plan is required in order to receive Community Development Block Grant funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This plan includes the City's Housing and Community Development goals for FY 2007-08 as outlined in the Five Year Consolidated Plan and the City Council's guidance for funding priorities. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing submittal to HUD of the City's One Year Action Plan for Housing, Economic and Community Development for Fiscal Year 2007-08; authorizing a budget transfer to incorporate the CDBG and HOME funds into the 2007 -08 operating budget; and authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to secure and award CDBG, HOME Administrative and Redevelopment Funds for the City. By: a~ab Marty VanDuyn ,Assistant City Manager Attachment: Resolution Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" CDBG Funding Recommendations for FY 2007-08 One Year Action PIan RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN AND STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 2007-2008 FISCAL YEAR AND ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; AUTHORIZING A BUDGET TRANSFER INCORPORATING CDBG AND HOME FUNDS INTO THE 2007-2008 OPERATING BUDGET; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO SECURE AND AWARD CDBG, HOME ADMINISTRATIVE AND REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS FOR THE CITY. WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to submit the One Year Action Plan and Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") Program for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 to the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Council authorize a budget transfer to incorporate the CDBG and HOME funds into the 2007-08 operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes submittal of the City's One Year Action PIan and Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007- 2008 and all required documents to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and authorizes a budget transfer to incorporate the CDBG and HOME funds into the 2007-2008 operating budget. BE IT, FURTHER RESOVLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents necessary to secure and award CDBG, HOME Administrative and Redevelopment funds for the City. * * * * * 1 I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of , 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 2