The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-02-23 Planning Commission AgendaThursday, November 2, 2023 7:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Library Parks & Recreation Building, Council Chambers Room 135 901 Civic Campus Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Planning Commission ALEX TZANG, Chairperson NORMAN FARIA, Vice Chairperson SAM SHIHADEH, Commissioner MICHELE EVANS, Commissioner SARAH FUNES, Commissioner AYSHA PAMUKCU, Commissioner JOHN BAKER, Commissioner Regular Meeting Agenda HYBRID IN-PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE 1 November 2, 2023Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda How to observe the Meeting (no public comment): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26, Comcast, Channel 27, or AT&T, Channel 99 2) https://www.ssf.net/government/city-council/video-streaming-city-and-council-meetings/planning-commission 3) Zoom meeting: https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/82584801637 (Enter your email and name) Webinar ID: 825 8480 1637 Join by Telephone: +1 669 900 6833 How to Submit written Public Comment before the meeting: Email: PCcomments@ssf.net Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting. The email will be monitored during the meeting.The City encourages the submission of comments by 6:00pm on the date of the Public Hearing to facilitate inclusion in the meeting record. How to provide Public Comment during the meeting: COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER During a meeting, comments can only be made in person: Complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chambers. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americanswith Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at all-cc@ssf.net. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at all-cc@ssf.net, 72-hours before the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023 2 November 2, 2023Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PUBLIC COMMENT DISCLOSURE OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for Planning Commissioners to disclose any communications, including site visits, they have had on current agenda items, or any conflict of interest regarding current agenda items. CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of draft minutes from the October 19, 2023 Planning Commission1. 10-19-23 PC Final MinutesAttachments: Report regarding consideration of Master Sign Program and Design Review for Gateway Campus at 901 Gateway Boulevard in the Business and Technology Park-High (BTP-H) and East 101 Transit Core (ETC) Zoning Districts in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) and determination that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Victoria Kim, Associate Planner) 2. Attachment 1_Draft Findings Attachment 2_Conditions of Approval Attachment 3_Plan Set Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING Report regarding a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve application for Design Review for a new Aquatic Center at Orange Memorial Park, and adopt the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005) in accordance with the California Public Resources Code and the California Environmental Quality Act. (Philip Vitale, Deputy Director - Capital Projects, and Adena Friedman, Chief Planner) 3. Attach 1 DRB Comment LettersAttachments: Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023 3 November 2, 2023Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005) for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center in accordance with Section 21080 of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 et seq. 3a. Exhibit A ISMND Exhibit B MMRP Attachments: Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve a Design Review permit (DR23-0037) for the new Aquatic Center at Orange Memorial Park within the Parks and Recreation (P&R) Zoning District 3b. Exhibit A OMP Aquatic Center COAs Exhibit B OMP Aquatic Center Plan Set Attachments: ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS The Commission has adopted a policy that applicants and their representatives have a maximum time limit of 20 minutes to make a presentation on their project. Non-applicants may speak a maximum of 3 minutes on any agenda item. Questions from Commissioners to applicants or non-applicants may be answered by using additional time. ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT **Any interested party will have 15 calendar days from the date of an action or decision taken by the Planning Commission to appeal that action or decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk as provided under Chapter 20.570 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. In the event an appeal period ends on a Saturday, Sunday, or any other day the City is closed, the appeal period shall end at the close of business on the next consecutive business day. The cost to appeal for applicants, residents, and all others is as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023 4 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-955 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:1. Consideration of draft minutes from the October 19, 2023 Planning Commission City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™5 October 19, 2023 Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TIME: 7:00 PM AGENDA REVIEW No changes. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF None. PUBLIC COMMENTS • None. CONSENT CALENDAR – Voting Key: (yes, no abstain) 1. Consideration of draft minutes from the September 21, 2023 Planning Commission Motion to approve: Commissioner Shihadeh, Second – Commissioner Baker, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-10-19 7:00 PM - HYBRID IN- PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE (granicus.com) PUBLIC HEARING 2. Report regarding applications for Design Review and a Transportation Demand Management Plan for a new 8-story office / R&D building with detached parking garage at 573 Forbes Boulevard in the Business Technology Park - High (BTP-H) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), and determination that the project is consistent with the 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to California Environmental ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS PRESENT: Chair Tzang, Vice Chair Faria Commissioners: Baker, Evans, Funes-Ozturk, Shihadeh ABSENT: Pamukcu STAFF PRESENT: Adena Friedman – Chief Planner – Christy Usher – Senior Planner – Stephanie Skangos – Associate Planner 6 October 19, 2023 Minutes Page 2 of 3 Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15183 and related CEQA requirements. (Stephanie Skangos, Associate Planner) Public Hearing opened 7:08pm Public Hearing closed 7:58pm 2a. Resolution making findings and a determination that the proposed office / R&D project at 573 Forbes Boulevard (“Project”) is fully within the scope of environmental analysis in the previously certified 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, and the Environmental Checklist prepared for the Project demonstrates that the proposed Project qualifies for streamlined environmental review as there are no project-specific effects which are peculiar to the Project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15183. Motion to approve: Vice Chair Faria, Second – Chair Tzang, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-10-19 7:00 PM - HYBRID IN- PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE (granicus.com) 2b. Resolution making findings and approving Design Review and a Transportation Demand Management Plan for the construction of a new 8-story office / R&D building within the Business Technology Park - High (BTP-H) Zoning District at 573 Forbes Boulevard. Motion to approve: Vice Chair Faria, Second – Commissioner Baker, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-10-19 7:00 PM - HYBRID IN- PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE (granicus.com) 3. Report regarding applications for Master Plan, Precise Plan, Design Review, Use Permit, Development Agreement, Transportation Demand Management Plan and Vesting Tentative Map to redevelop an existing 19-acre commercial site into a 1.65 million square foot life science research and development campus and associated amenity uses in the east of 101 area at Forbes Boulevard and Allerton Avenue in the Business Technology Park - High (BTP-H) Zoning District and determination that the project is consistent with the 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15183) (Christy Usher, Senior Planner) Public Hearing opened 8:01pm Public Hearing closed 8:51pm 3a. Resolution making findings recommending that the City Council make a determination that the environmental effects of the construction of the Vantage Healthpeak Life Sciences Campus located at 420, 440, 460, 480 and 490 Forbes Boulevard, consisting of six buildings and three associated parking structures, were sufficiently analyzed under the 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report and 7 October 19, 2023 Minutes Page 3 of 3 no additional environmental analysis is needed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15183. Motion to approve: Commissioner Shihadeh, Second – Vice Chair Faria, approved by roll call (4-2-0) Commissioner Baker and Funes-Ozturk voted No. Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-10-19 7:00 PM - HYBRID IN- PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE (granicus.com) 3b. Resolution making findings recommending that the City Council approve entitlements for a Master Plan P22-0117 & Precise Plan P22-0138: Master Plan MP23-0002, Precise Plan PP23-0001, Design Review DR22-0036, Use Permit UP22-0011, Transportation Demand Management Plan TDM22-0009, Vesting Tentative Map PM22-0002, and Development Agreement DA22-0005 to construct a new life sciences campus on approximately 19 acres, located at 420, 440, 460, 480, and 490 Forbes Boulevard in the Business and Technology Park - High (BTP-H) Zoning District. Motion to approve: Commissioner Shihadeh, Second – Commissioner Evans, approved by roll call (4-2-0) Commissioner Baker and Funes-Ozturk voted No. Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2023-10-19 7:00 PM - HYBRID IN- PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE (granicus.com) ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION None. ADJOURNMENT Chair Tzang adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9:00PM. Adena Friedman, Chief Planner Alex Tzang, Chairperson or Norm Faria, Vice Chairperson Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Commission City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco AF/af 8 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-655 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:2. Report regarding consideration of Master Sign Program and Design Review for Gateway Campus at 901 Gateway Boulevard in the Business and Technology Park-High (BTP-H)and East 101 Transit Core (ETC) Zoning Districts in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC)and determination that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Victoria Kim, Associate Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1.Determine the proposed Master Sign Program (SIGNS 23-0018)for Gateway Campus located at 901 Gateway Boulevard is categorically exempt from CEQA per Section 15311, Class 11; and 2.Approve the Master Sign Progrma based on the attached Draft Findings and subject to the attached Draft Conditions of Approval. MOTION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION Move to determine the project is exempt from CEQA and approve the Master Sign Program subject to the attached draft Findings and draft Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Proposed Master Sign Program contains three sign types:Monument,Wall Mounted,and Skyline Signs. Skyline signs for individual tenant ID signs may vary on tenants’logos and fonts,but no variation in size or layout for maximum recognition and wayfinding effectiveness.The total area of the proposed signs will be approximately 9,620 square feet. ZONING CONSISTENCY South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC)Section 20.360.010 (Master Sign Program)describes that the purpose of a Master Sign Program is to provide a method for an applicant to integrate the design and placement of signs within a project with the overall development design to achieve a more unified appearance.The Master Sign Program consists of the following sign types: Monument Signage: ·Primary and Address Signs -The Master Sign Program includes primary (Sign Type A1)and tenant identity pylons (Sign Type A2)which will identify the project campus site and entries for walking visitors and vehicular drivers.Two primary signs are located at the two junctions,Gateway and OysterCity of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™9 File #:23-655 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:2. visitors and vehicular drivers.Two primary signs are located at the two junctions,Gateway and Oyster Point Boulevards and Corporate Drive and Gateway Boulevard entrance.Five address signs are equally distributed along Gateway Boulevard with the clear identifiable address signs for vehicular safety.All primary and address signs will be illuminated. ·Wayfinding Signs -The vehicles directional signs (Sign Type A4)and freestanding/blade entry ID (Sign Type P2)signs are located along drive-aisles.Pedestrian directional signs (Sign Type B1 and B2)and amenity identity and service area signs (Sign Type A7 and A9)are located along pedestrian routes throughout the campus. All way-finding signs, except for service area signs, will be illuminated. ·Tenant Listing Signs -Freestanding tenant listing signs (Sign Type A3)are located at entrances of all campus buildings to identify building addresses and major occupants and all the tenant listing signs will be illuminated. ·Transportation Signs -Taxi/Rideshare identity (Sign Type A5)and shuttle identity (Sign Type A6)signs are fabricated aluminum cabinets with internal structural frames at street corners and driveways. ·Regulations and Regulatory Signs -Rules and Regulations signs (Sign Type A8)are in the middle of Gateway Campus where pedestrians can access,and regulatory signs (Sign Type A10)will be located near entry access points and entrances to parking structures. Wall Mounted Signage: 11 address signs (Sign Type T2)and 6 parking entrance identity signs (Sign Type P1)are proposed.The wall mounted address signs will provide identification of all buildings in the campus and each sign will be approximately 5 square feet in size.The parking entrance signs will be located at major parking areas and approximately 10 square feet in size. Skyline Signage: Tenant ID signs (Sign Type T1)are proposed to identify major tenants for recognition from a campus-wide view and/or larger viewing distance.The proposed 25 skyline identification signs will be fabricated aluminum channel letters with face illumination and maximum 10 feet tall and 42 feet long (420 square feet in each sign area). DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Master Sign Program went to the Design Review Board (DRB)meeting on October 17,2023,and the DRB recommended the application for approval. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The Project property is Oyster Point Coastal Commercial and East of 101 Transit Core as General Plan land use designations.These designations are in East of 101 sub-area,the largest sub-area designed for campus environments.The Master Sign Program would be compatible and consistent with the intent of the General City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™10 File #:23-655 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:2. environments.The Master Sign Program would be compatible and consistent with the intent of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project has been evaluated to be categorically exempt from environmental review under the provision of CEQA, Section 15311(a), On-premise Signs. CONCLUSION The Master Sign Program would form an integrated signage at 901 Gateway Boulevard to improve cohesive atmosphere in the Gateway Campus.Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Master Sign Program, based on the attached draft Findings and Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1.Draft Findings 2.Draft Conditions of Approval 3.Master Sign Program Plan Set City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™11 FINDINGS OF APPROVAL P23-0087: SIGNS23-0018 901 GATEWAY BLVD (As recommended by City Planning Staff on November 2, 2023) As required by the Master Sign Permit Application Procedures (SSFMC Section 20.360.003) and the Design Review Procedures (SSFMC Section 20.480), the following findings are made in support of Master Sign Program 901 Gateway Blvd in the Business and Technology Park-High (BTP-H) and East 101 Transit Core (ETC) Zoning Districts in accordance with SSFMC Sections 20.100, 20.360, 20.460 and 20.480, based on public materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco Planning Division which include, but are not limited to: Application materials prepared by the applicant, dated submitted July 14, 2023; Planning Commission staff report dated November 2, 2023; and Conditions of Approval. Master Sign Program 1. The proposed signs are compatible in style and character with any building to which the signs are to be attached, any surrounding structures and any adjoining signage on the site. Supportive Evidence: Proposed signs are compatible in style and character with the buildings to which the signs are to be attached, any surrounding structures and any adjoining signage on the site because the proposed signs were designed to be in keeping with the architectural design of the buildings, using similar materials and colors. 2. Future tenants will be provided with adequate opportunities to construct, erect or maintain a sign for identification. Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program contains standards for all monument, wall mounted, and skyline signs for the site. Any future tenants will be provided with adequate opportunities to construct, erect, or maintain a sign for identification. 3. Traffic signage and building addressing is adequate for pedestrian and vehicular circulation and emergency vehicle access. Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program includes the installation of address, wayfinding, and tenant listing signs for the entire site that will improve both pedestrian and vehicular circulation and emergency vehicle access. Design Review Findings 1. The applicable standards and requirements of this Ordinance. Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program (SSFMC Section 20.360) complies with the applicable standards and requirements of this Ordinance because as submitted and modified through the Design Review Process, 12 Findings of Approval this sign program meets or complies with the applicable standards included in Chapter 20.100 (Non-Residential District). 2. The General Plan and any applicable specific plans the City Council has adopted. Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program complies with the General Plan and the East 101 sub-area Plan the City Council has adopted because the proposed sign program is consistent with the policies and design direction provided in the South San Francisco General Plan for the Oyster Point Coastal Commercial and East of 101 Transit Core land use designations by encouraging the development of high technology campuses in the East of 101 Area. 3. Any applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council. Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program complies with any applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council in that the proposed sign program is consistent with the Design Principles in Section 20.360.003. 4. The applicable design review criteria in Section 20.480.006 (“Design Review Criteria”). Supportive Evidence: The Master Sign Program complies with the applicable design review criteria in Section 20.480.006 (“Design Review Criteria”) because the project has been evaluated against, and found to be consistent with, the eight design review criteria included in the “Design Review Criteria” section of the Ordinance. 13 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P23-0087: SIGNS23-0018 901 GATEWAY BLVD (As recommended by City Planning Staff on November 2, 2023) A. Planning Division requirements shall be as follows: 1. The applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the Design Review Board and modify the Master Sign Program, as needed, per the direction and comments at their meeting of October 17, 2023. 2. The applicant is responsible for providing site signage during construction, which contains contact information for questions regarding the construction. 3. The construction drawings shall substantially comply with the Planning Commission approved plans, prepared by Corporate, dated July 4, 2023, as amended by the conditions of approval. 4. The total sign area for all signs included in the Master Sign Program shall not exceed the square footage as indicated in the Planning Commission approved plans. Sign area shall be calculated by blocking or boxing around the outside edge of the proposed signage, including the logo. 5. This permit shall not be construed to authorize any existing unpermitted signs on or within the property. Any such unpermitted signage, including but not limited to wall signage, monument signs and directional signs shall be removed before new signs authorized by this master sign permit are installed. 6. Any modification to the approved use, plans or conditions of approval shall be subject to SSFMC Section 20.450.012 (“Modification”), whereby the Chief Planner may approve minor changes. (Planning Division contact person: Victoria Kim, Associate Planner (650) 877-8535) 14 all rights reserved 2022 901 GATEWAY SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA Design + Build. SIGN SYSTEMS PROJECT: 10/13/23 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM SIGN TYPE A2 - TENANT IDENTITY PYLON - Fabricate and install (x15) internally illuminated freestanding tenant listing sign, concrete footing. Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. - Fabricate and install (x5) internally illuminated tenant identity pylon sign, concrete footing. Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. SIGN TYPE A3 - FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING - Fabricate and install (x2) internally illuminated primary monument (center identification) sign, concrete footing. SIGN TYPE A1 - PRIMARY MONUMENT (CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. - Fabricate and install (x4) internally illuminated pedestrian directory sign, concrete footing. SIGNTYPE B2 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. - Fabricate and install (x6) non-illuminated building entrance id, wall mounting. SIGN TYPE A10 - ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE - Fabricate and install (x4) non-illuminated enhanced regulatory sign, aluminum post and concrete footing. - Fabricate and install (x7) internally illuminated pedestrian directional sign, concrete footing. Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. SIGNTYPE T2 - ADDRESS ID - Fabricate and install (x11) non-illuminated address id, wall mounting. SIGNTYPE P1 - BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID SIGNTYPE B1 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL - Fabricate and install (x5) non-illuminated exterior rules and regulations, concrete footing. SIGN TYPE A9 - SERVICE AREA IDENTITY - Fabricate and install (x8) non-illuminated service area id, concrete footing. SIGN TYPE A6 - SHUTTLE IDENTITY - Fabricate and install (x2) non-illuminated exterior shuttle id, concrete footing. SIGN TYPE A4 - VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL - Fabricate and install (x2) non-illuminated exterior taxi/rideshare id, concrete footing. - Fabricate and install (x19) internally illuminated vehicular directional, concrete footing. Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. SIGN TYPE A7 - EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY - Fabricate and install (x4) internally illuminated exterior amenity identity, concrete footing. Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. SIGN TYPE A5 - TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY SIGN TYPE A8 - EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNTYPE T1 - TENANT ID (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. - Fabricate and install (x10) internally illuminated freestanding entry sign, concrete footing. - Fabricate and install as many as (x21) face illuminated tenant id, wall mounted. SIGNTYPE P2 - FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID Connecting to power source ( BY OTHERS) with dedicated 20amp circuit, photocell, and timer. 2022 CALIFORNIA CODE WILL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT THE GATEWAY 15 all rights reserved 2022 2 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SITE PLAN - PARCEL FRONTAGE 3. SITE PLAN - BUILDING FRONTAGE 4. CALCULATIONS 5. STYLE SHEET 6. SIGN TYPES 7. DESCRIPTIONS / USAGE / RESTRICTIONS 8. SIGN TYPE A1 - PRIMARY MONUMENT (Center Identification Signs) 9. SIGN TYPE A2 - TENANT IDENTITY PYLON 10. SIGN TYPE A3 - FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING 11. SIGN TYPE A4 - VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL 12. SIGN TYPE A5 - TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY 13. SIGN TYPE A6 - SHUTTLE IDENTITY 14. SIGN TYPE A7 - EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY 15. SIGN TYPE A8 - EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS 16. SIGN TYPE A9 - SERVICE AREA IDENTITY 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - 10 11 - 14 15 - 18 19 - 22 23 - 26 27 - 28 29 - 32 31 - 32 33 - 34 35 - 36 17. SIGN TYPE A10 - ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE 18. SIGN TYPE B1 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL 19. SIGN TYPE B2 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY 20. SIGN TYPE T2 - ADDRESS ID 21. SIGN TYPE P1 - BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID 22. SIGN TYPE P2 - FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID 23. SIGN TYPE T1 - TENANT ID (High-Rise Building) 24. LOCATION PLAN 37 - 39 40 - 41 42 - 44 45 - 46 47 - 49 50 - 51 52 - 93 94 - 97 UPDATED 10/13/2023 16 all rights reserved 2022 3 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Gateway is a high intensity office / R&D project in the City of San Francisco, CA B. NAMING CONVENTIONS IN THIS GUIDE The term Project shall be used to refer to all activities including planning, construction and maintenance in regard to the property. The term Campus shall be used to refer to all buildings, grounds, roadways or other architectural features not specifically included in the scope of other terms such as Tenant. The term Tenant shall be used to refer to the occupants and businesses utilizing the portions of the Campus for their business. The term Owner shall be used to refer to Alexandria, 611 Gateway center LP, its agents and subsidiaries. The term City shall be used to refer to the city of San Francisco and its respective agencies, laws, policies or representatives. C. PURPOSE OF THE MASTER SIGN PLAN CRITERIA The Master Sign Plan Criteria is provided to guide developers, designers, architects, tenants and the City of San Francisco in the design, development, approval and implementation of signs at the Project. The regulations of this section shall govern the design and maintenance of Campus and Tenant signage within the Project Area. THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS CRITERIA ARE * To provide a clear criteria for developing a Master Sign Plan. Such a plan should follow the specifications in this document as guidelines for creating specific signage designs addressing all sign types within the Project. * To generate varied and creative signage incorporating a uniformly high level of design, graphics, continuity, consistency and maintenance. * To establish signing as a design element that contributes to the overall aesthetic of the project. * To provide standards of acceptability for signs in order to facilitate the review and approval process by the Owner and the City. * To supply property signage, tenant signage, and information and directional signage, providing for public safety through the ready recognition of wayfinding throughout the property. * To provide specific criteria regulating various aspects of signage for the property. * To provide specific criteria regulating various aspects of signage for the Tenant. * To regulate all permanent Campus and Tenant signage within the Projects boundaries. * To provide criteria for approval such that all signage approved from this document needs administrative approval in relation to zoning & guidelines. * All signs will require a building permit and must be submitted, reviewed and approved by the city before installed. D. FUTURE REVISIONS Minor deviations to the master sign program may be reviewed by the city’s planning department at staff level. Larger revisions would require an amendment to the Master Sign Program to be submitted. The level of revision requested will be reviewed and determined by the City’s planning department. 17 all rights reserved 2022 4 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SITE PLAN PARCEL FRONTAGES UPDATED 10/13/2023 APN NUMBERS: 015-024-290, 015-024-360, 015-024-480, 015-024-470, 015-024-460, 015-024-450, 015-024-520, 015-024-390, 015-024-380, 015-024-510, 015-024-490 18 all rights reserved 2022 5 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SITE PLAN BUILDING FRONTAGES UPDATED 10/13/2023 605.17 FT 556.33 FT 1161.5 FT 178.51 FT 746.9 FT 2,629.8 FT 227.38 FT 420.3 FT 503.34 FT 663.26 FT N ACRES: 38.37 SQ. FEET: 1,671,222.6 SQ. METERS: 155,260.37 19 all rights reserved 2022 6 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TOTAL SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS Total Sign Area Calculations in SF ALLOWABLE SIGNAGE - CALCULATIONS SITE AREA ACREAGE 38.4 ACRES SIGN TYPE A8. EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS x QTY PROPOSED A9. SERVICE AREA IDENTITY A10. ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN MAXIMUM SIGN AREA PROPOSED SF = TOTAL SIGN AREA USED 5 4 5 277.4 SF A7. EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY A3. FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING A2. TENANT IDENTITY PYLON 15 8 4 202.5 SF 450 SF (type A10 does not count toward total sign area) THE GATEWAY CAMPUS 40.5 SF 30 SF 3.3 SF 6.9 SF 6.9 SF 2 SF 19A4. VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL 14.6 SF B1. PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL 78.375 SF B2. PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY 418 SF A10. ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE - ACCESSIBLE AND EV 4 (type A10 does not count toward total sign area)1.25 SF 58.625 SF 72 SF T1. TENANT ID ( High-Rise Building)21420 SF 8,820 SF T2. ADDRESS ID 114.75 SF UPDATED 10/13/2023 A1. PRIMARY MONUMENT (center identification signs)76 SF 2 A5. TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY A6. SHUTTLE IDENTITY 5.3 SF 5.3 SF 2 2 P1. BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE IDENTITY 9.67 SF 6 58.02 SF P2. FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID 12 SF 10 120 SF 3840 SF MONUMENT/FREESTANDING SIGNAGE (type A9 does not count toward total sign area) (type A8 does not count toward total sign area) (type A7 does not count toward total sign area) (type A6 does not count toward total sign area) (type A5 does not count toward total sign area) (type A1 does not count toward total sign area) TOTAL =1,180.525 SF SIGN TYPE x QTY PROPOSEDPROPOSED SF = TOTAL SIGN AREA USED HIGH RISE BUILDING ID SIGNAGE SIGN TYPE x QTY PROPOSEDPROPOSED SF = TOTAL SIGN AREA USED DIRECTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL SIGNAGE TOTAL =8,820 SF TOTAL =58.02 SF GRAND TOTAL =10,058.545 SF (type T2 does not count toward total sign area) 1. Location. Signs shall be located on the upper-most story of the building. 3. Sign Copy. Sign copy shall be limited to one * High-Rise Building Identification Signs shall be limited to buildings of at least four stories located in the Commercial and Employment districts. 2. Sign Type. Signs shall be composed of individual, internally illuminated channel letters. 20 all rights reserved 2022 7 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY STYLE SHEET FONTSBRAND ARTWORK Century Gothic Reg MATERIAL AND COLOR SCHEDULEICON/SYMBOLS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 Century Gothic Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 The materials and colors shown are intended to be base, standard color pallet for the project. Additional colors and materials may be reviewed and approved on a case-by-case basis. Custom colors for tenant logos may be allowed with planning review. Matthews MP 31846 Onyx P1 Matthews MP 4439 Angora Grey P2 Matthews MP 13702 Beale Street Blues P3 Matthews MP 31645 Designer White P4 White Acrylic #7328M2 AluminumM1 Matthews MP 2160 Sailboat Blue P5 Concrete No exposed aggregate M3 Decomposed GraniteM4 White Polycarbonate (Lexan) M5 Matthews MP 483 Limonlima P6 Matthews paint to match Blue Pantone 300U P7 Matthews paint to match Light Blue Pantone 306U P8 3M Vinyl White Reflective V1 3M Vinyl Blue Translucent V2 Silver Metallic Precision Coating Satin Finish P9 21 all rights reserved 2022 8 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPES scale: 1/4” = 1’-0” scale: 1/4” = 1’-0” THE GATEWAY 701 801 901 951 TENANT IDENTITY PYLONA2 751TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANTTENANT FREESTANDING TENANT LISTINGA3 901 AMENITY LAWN 951 PARKING VEHICULAR DIRECTIONALA4 GATEWAY CAFESERVICEAREARULES ANDREGULATIONS NO SMOKINGNO LITTERINGANOTHER RULE HERENO LOITERINGPETS MUST BE LEASHEDRULE HEREMORE RULES COMINGPLACE HOLDER RULE 901 LAWN801 PARKINGAMENITY 951 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONALB1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORYB2 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONSA8 SERVICE AREA IDA9 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGEA10INTERIOR AMENITY IDA7 PARKINGONLY MINIMUM FINE$250THEGATEWAY 801 951 901 751 TENANT scale: 1/16” = 1’-0” TENANT IDT1 UPDATED 03/09/2023 695695 ADDRESS IDT2 STOP PRIMARY MONUMENTA1 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDA5 SHUTTLE IDA6 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY IDP2 BLDG. MOUNTED ENTRANCE IDP1 22 all rights reserved 2022 9 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY DESCRIPTIONS / USAGE / RESTRICTIONS A. CAMPUS SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Design objective The primary objective of the Master Sign Program for The Gateway is to generate quality, creative signage that works to reinforce the quality and character of this Project, while at the same time providing effective project identity, wayfinding and campus safety. 2. Design Quality All signage will achieve the highest level of design quality and be consistent with the quality defined in the Project submittal documents. All signage will be consistent with the architectural and landscape character of the Project. This consistency shall be maintained through: complimentary materials, design, texture, color and typefaces. The scale and proportion of graphics shall be consistent with the site, landscape and buildings of the project. All signage must be designed and specified to meet the construction requirements in this document. This includes all quality standards for finishing, color and durability. Employ illumination techniques in keeping with a high quality development such as: • Internally illuminated channel letters and logos with back lit illumination • Externally illuminated from light sources hidden in the landscaping for ground / monument signs 3. Design Content Campus signs will convey the name of Project, identify tenants and address as well as provide wayfinding information around the campus. Specifics of this content and its use are detailed in this document. 4. Sign Placement Campus signs shall be located as indicated on the elevations and master sign location plans included in this package. Locations given indicate a general area where the sign will be located. Exact location will depend on final design and will be given during submittal stage of sign implimentation and permitting. Monument and free-standing signs will be located in such a way as to have a minimum setback from traffic, but shall not block view of traffic entering a lane. Exact location should be coordinated with traffic consultant’s line of sight studies. 23 all rights reserved 2022 10 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY 10. Prohibited Sign Types The following sign types shall be prohibited on this Project : • Illuminated sign boxes with face lit panels. • Illuminated back-lit canopies. • Signs with exposed raceways, conduit, junction boxes, transformer lamps, tubing, or neon crossovers of any type. • Rotating, animated and flashing signs. • Pole signs and other signs with exposed structural supports not intended as a design element except for code-required signs. • Pennants, banners, or flags identifying individual tenants. • A-frame sandwich boards. • Vehicle signs, except for the identification of a business enterprise or advertisement upon a vehicle which is used in the operation of the business. The signage must be painted on or otherwise affixed so as not to project from the usual profile of the vehicle. The vehicle must be in an operable state. • Signs painted on an exterior building wall, window, fascia, chimney of a building, on a fence or fence-type wall, on benches, fence posts, trash receptacles, utility poles, utility boxes, storage sheds, bus shelters, satellite dish antennas or other accessory structures. • Signs attached, painted on, or otherwise affixed to trees, other living vegetation, landscaping or natural materials. • Any sign designed to be moved from place to place. • Signs attached, painted or otherwise affixed to awnings, tents or umbrellas. • Balloons and inflatable signs. • Any signs including freestanding signs advertising the availability of employment opportunities. • Signs which emit sound, odor or visible matter or which bear or contain statements, words or pictures of an obscene, pornographic or immoral character. • Fluorescent or reflective sign colors. • Simulated materials, i.e. wood grained plastic laminate, wall covering, paper, cardboard or foam. • Signs attached directly to raceways unless reasonable access is possible through wall or structure behind sign. • Fluorescent or reflective materials such as mirror. *NOTE - All signs must be submitted to the City for staff review and approval before being installed. Exemptions to any of the restrictions outlined in this document must be presented to and approved by the Director of Community Development or equivalent authority and will require an amendment to the Master Sign Program for future reference. DESCRIPTIONS / USAGE / RESTRICTIONS 5. Typestyles Type shall be sized in accordance with established standards for visibility and legibility. Sizing shall take into consideration viewing distance, site lines and vehicle speed for vehicular oriented signs. The font Century Gothic Regular and Bold has been outlined as the project’s default and standard type style. Minor variations may be approved by planning at staff level when keeping consistent with design guidelines and project style. 6. Lighting Design of signage lighting shall contribute to the design of the sign, and shall not detract from the overall design character of the Project. Lighting shall provide for enhanced legibility and effectiveness. 7. Colors Sign colors are to provide sufficient contrast against building background colors. Color of letter returns are to contrast with building colors for good daytime readability. Refer to this document’s style sheet for approved colors and materials. 8. Sign Maintenance All signs shall be maintained in an as-new and fully- functional condition. Signs shall meet all relevant standards of the Project submittal documents at all times. Project management shall make periodic inspections of all signs on site. Any deficiencies shall be immediately corrected by the person(s) or business(es) responsible for the maintenance of said sign or signs. 9. Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall comply with the City’s Planning Division requirements. 24 all rights reserved 2022 11 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PRIMARY MONUMENT SIGN TYPE A1 PRIMARY MONUMENT A. DESIGN INTENT Campus Identification signs are intended to serve as a means of identifying the campus. This sign type reinforces and celebrates the brand identity of the campus or a major tenant of the campus. Depending on tenant leasing and the Owner’s branding strategy for the project, the content of this sign may display the project logo (The Gateway), the identity of a tenant who has leased a significant majority of the campus (or a section of campus) or a combination of both. The intent of this sign is to create a unique sense of the campus as a branded environment while at the same time compliment the architectural character of the project. Designs of this sign type should include strong landscaping and architectural elements as well as the brand identity content. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Sign type A1 signs may be designed in a variety of ways, but should include an overall sculptural feel. Sign content may include project or tenant logo and other brand imagery or elements. Final design shall have strong integration with landscaping and is encouraged to include complimentary materials and design elements. C. SIGN MASSING D. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. E. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. SIGN TYPE A1 PRIMARY MONUMENT PROPOSED = 76 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”1 RENDERING scale:NTS5 76 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”3 TOP VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”4 GRADE 4'-0" 19'-0" 15” GRADE (CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) *Area Not Counted. The area of the sign shall not count towards the permissible sign area of the individual lot. *Non-Residential Districts. The maximum sign area in nonresidential districts may be no more than one foot for each linear foot of street frontage, but in no case shall the total sign area exceed 200 square feet. If more than one entrance to the lot exists, the maximum sign area permitted will be dividedÚmong the number of entryways and signs requested. *Identifiable Area. The signs must be for a development containing a minimum of 20,000 square feet with an integrated site and design plan creating a single unified development with one or more uses. *Residential Districts and Subdivisions. For subdivisions and other residential area entry signs, the maximum sign area permitted is 20 square feet.ìigns shall be mounted on a fence, wall or other similar entry feature. If more than one entrance exists, the sign area permitted will be divided betweeníhe number of entryways and signs requested *Sign Base. The sign base is to be located within a planter box or planting area, the design and location of which is to be approved by the Chief Planner UPDATED 10/13/2023 25 all rights reserved 2022 12 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PRIMARY MONUMENT ELEVATIONS BACK VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/8”=1’-0”4 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/8”=1’-0”5 QTY: DESCRIPTION 2 E. Internally illuminated acrylic accent inset 2” from face of side frame A. Push through 1/2” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated C. Landscape wall by others F. Painted P8 accent inset 3” from face of side frame. D. Painted P3 accent inset 1” from face to side frame B. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required A1 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A1 PRIMARY MONUMENT PROPOSED = 76 SF FRONT VIEW scale:3/8”=1’-0”1 GRADE SIDE VIEW scale:3/8”=1’-0”2 TOP VIEW scale:3/8”=1’-0”3 4'-0" 19'-0" 15” 6”15” 16'-7" 29” 15”33” 4'-0"6” 15” GRADE A 2”11”4”31” 4'-0" 2”2” 2'-5" 15” 16'-7" 2”2” 6” B 2”2”11” 15” D E F BB A C UPDATED 03/09/2023 (CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) 26 all rights reserved 2022 13 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PRIMARY MONUMENT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SECTION A scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”6 in accordance with the requirements This sign is intended to be installed of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. QTY: DESCRIPTION 2 A. Steel support as required per sign contractor’s engineer B. LED system as required to provide even illumination C. Push through 1/2” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required E. Internally illuminated acrylic accent with first surface applied translucent vinyl inset 2” from face of side frame F. Removable face and back panels mechanically fastened to internal frame with stainless steel socket drive c/s flat head screws painted to match adjacent color A1 SIGN TYPE SECTION B scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”7 SIGN TYPE A1 PRIMARY MONUMENT PROPOSED = 76 SF A B C D E E F E B D C F UPDATED 03/09/2023 (CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) 27 all rights reserved 2022 14 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PRIMARY MONUMENT PHOTO ELEVATION UPDATED 09/11/2023 (CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) 28 all rights reserved 2022 15 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TENANT IDENTITY PYLON SIGN TYPE A2 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON A. DESIGN INTENT Campus Identification signs are intended to serve as a means of identifying the campus. This sign type reinforces and celebrates the brand identity of the campus or a major tenant of the campus. Depending on tenant leasing and the Owner’s branding strategy for the project, the content of this sign may display the project logo (The Gateway), the identity of a tenant who has leased a significant majority of the campus (or a section of campus) or a combination of both. The intent of this sign is to create a unique sense of the campus as a branded environment while at the same time compliment the architectural character of the project. Designs of this sign type should include strong landscaping and architectural elements as well as the brand identity content. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Sign type A2 signs may be designed in a variety of ways, but should include an overall sculptural feel. Sign content may include project or tenant logo and other brand imagery or elements. Final design shall have strong integration with landscaping and is encouraged to include complimentary materials and design elements. C. SIGN MASSING Pylon signs not exceeding twenty feet in height, and twenty five (25) square feet in total sign area are allowed per street frontage. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. D. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. E. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. SIGN TYPE A2 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON PROPOSED = 40.5 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”1 RENDERING scale:NTS5 40.5 SF THE GATEWAY 701 801 901 951 SIDE VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”3 THE GATEWAY 701 801 901 951 TOP VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”4 13'-6" 3'-0"10” GRADE 29 all rights reserved 2022 16 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TENANT IDENTITY PYLON ELEVATIONS THE GATEWAY 701 801 901 951 FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 GRADE 3'-0" CL 2'-3" 6” 10'-3" 6” 13'-6" SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 10” 2'-3" 6” 10” 9'-11" THE GATEWAY 701 801 901 951 CL 21” 3 1/2” 2 1/2” 6” 10” 6” 5” 6” 5” 6” 5” 6” 6'-2" 6” 3'-0" FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:1/2”=1’-0”4 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:1/2”=1’-0”5 1” 1 3/4” 5” 8” 10” 10” QTY: DESCRIPTION 5 A. Push through 1/4” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated B. Notch to house linear light fixture to wash up angled face C. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required E. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer K. Uplighting F. Concrete base with below grade foundation I. Internally illuminated acrylic accent inset 2” from face of side frame L. Where sign is located in soft-scape: Crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging G. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation. J. Painted P8 accent inset 3” from face of side frame. H. Painted P3 accent inset 1” from face to side frame A2 SIGN TYPE TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”3 A B C D F G E H I J K H I J L A B SIGN TYPE A2 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON PROPOSED = 40.5 SF 30 all rights reserved 2022 17 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TENANT IDENTITY PYLON CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SECTION A scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”6 of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements QTY: DESCRIPTION 5 A. Steel support as required per sign contractor’s engineer B. LED system as required to provide even illumination C. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required G. Push through 1/4” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated F. Removable face and back panels mechanically fastened to internal frame with stainless steel socket drive c/s flat head screws painted to match adjacent color H. Notch to house LED system to washup angled face E. Internally illuminated acrylic accent with first surface applied translucent vinyl inset 2” from face of side frame A2 SIGN TYPE A B C D F E B D G H F B C 1” 1” 1” SECTION B scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”7 SIGN TYPE A2 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON PROPOSED = 40.5 SF 31 all rights reserved 2022 18 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY TENANT IDENTITY PYLON PHOTO ELEVATION UPDATED 09/11/2023 32 all rights reserved 2022 19 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A3 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING SIGN TYPE A3 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING PROPOSED = 30 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”1 30 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”3 3'-0"10” GRADE751TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANTTENANT 10'-0"751TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANTTENANT RENDERING scale:NTS5TOP VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”4 A. SIGN MASSING The height of Monument signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. 33 all rights reserved 2022 20 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONSFREESTANDING TENANT LISTING FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 GRADE 3'-0" SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”3 L 751TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT CL 3'-0" 6” 6'-0" 6” 10'-0" 10” 3'-0" 6” 5'-8" 10” FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:1/2”=1’-0”4 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:1/2”=1’-0”5751TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT CL 1'-2" 3'-0" 3'-0" 6" 6" 2”8" 2” 2”1” 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 1'-6" 6” C A F G E A B D 1 3/4” 5” 8” 10” H B 1” I J K H I J 10” QTY: DESCRIPTION 15 C. Removable panel with push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated L. Where sign is located in soft-scape: Crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging A. Push through 1/4” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated J. Painted P8 accent inset 3” from face of side frame. E. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer F. Concrete base with below grade foundation I. Internally illuminated acrylic accent inset 2” from face of side frame H. Painted P3 accent inset 1” from face to side frame B. Notch to house linear light fixture to wash up angled face D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum G. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation. K. Uplighting A3 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A3 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING PROPOSED = 30 SF 34 all rights reserved 2022 21 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILSFREESTANDING TENANT LISTING SECTION A scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”6 A B C D F E 1” 1” 1” QTY: DESCRIPTION 15 A. Steel support as required per sign contractor’s engineer B. LED system as required to provide even illumination C. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required E. Internally illuminated acrylic accent with first surface applied translucent vinyl inset 2” from face of side frame G. Push through 1/4” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated H. Notch to house LED system to washup angled face F. Removable face and back panels mechanically fastened to internal frame with stainless steel socket drive c/s flat head screws painted to match adjacent color A3 SIGN TYPE This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. H F SECTION B scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”7 D B G C B SIGN TYPE A3 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING PROPOSED = 30 SF 35 all rights reserved 2022 22 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING PHOTO ELEVATION UPDATED 09/11/2023 36 all rights reserved 2022 23 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A4 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL SIGN TYPE A4 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL PROPOSED = 14.6 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 14.6 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”3 GRADE RENDERING scale:NTS5TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”4 901 AMENITY LAWN 951 PARKING5'-10" 2'-6"8” 951 PARKING 751 901 AMENITY LAWN A. SIGN MASSING Directional signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. NOTE: TEXT IS PLACEHOLDER. FINAL COPY TBD. UPDATED 03/09/2023 37 all rights reserved 2022 24 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL ELEVATIONS GRADE 901 AMENITY LAWN 951 PARKING FRONT VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”1 2'-6" 5'-4" 6” 5'-10" 10” SIDE VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”2 TOP VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”3 8” 5'-0" NOTE: TEXT IS PLACEHOLDER. FINAL COPY TBD. UPDATED 03/09/2023 38 all rights reserved 2022 25 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS QTY: DESCRIPTION 19 A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum B. Removable face and back panel mechanically fastened to internal frame with stainless steel socket drive c/s flat head screws painted to match adjacent color. C. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer I. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging K. LED system as required to provide even illumination D. Concrete base with below grade foundation L. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated E. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify grade prior to fabrication and installation F. Painted P3 accent inset 1” from face to side frame G. Internally illuminated acrylic accent inset 2” from face of side frame H. Painted P8 accent inset 3” from face of side frame. J. Steel support as required per sign contractor’s engineer A4 SIGN TYPE GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”1 1 1/2” 4” 6” 8” SIDE VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”2 901 AMENITY LAWN 951 PARKING 3”7 1/2” 2'-6" 6 1/2” 3” 2” 3” 2” 3” 8” 4 1/4” 2'-8 1/4" 6” A A B C D E F G H TOP VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”3 I SECTION A scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”4 J K L A B of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements SIGN TYPE A4 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL PROPOSED = 14.6 SF NOTE: TEXT IS PLACEHOLDER. FINAL COPY TBD. UPDATED 03/09/2023 39 all rights reserved 2022 26 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL PHOTO ELEVATION UPDATED 09/11/2023 40 all rights reserved 2022 27 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A5 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY SIGN TYPE A5 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY PROPOSED = 5.3 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 5.3 SF GRADE SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”3 SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”4 TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”5 A. SIGN MASSING Exterior Amenity signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. UPDATED 03/09/2023 8” 8'-0" 41 all rights reserved 2022 28 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 QTY: DESCRIPTION 2 C. 1/4” Thick plate under polycarbonate face A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum E. Concrete base with below grade foundation B. 3/16” Laser cut adhered to polycarbonate face G. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging F. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation H. 1/4” Thick white polycarbonate inset 1/2” from face of frame D. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer A5 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A5 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY PROPOSED = 5.3 SF TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”5 G SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY 8” 7'-3" 9” 8'-0" 8” 6'-9" 1'-3" 8” 9” 7'-3" 8'-0" A 7 1/4" 2 1/2” 6” 8” 6” 1'-3" B C D E F H UPDATED 03/09/2023 42 all rights reserved 2022 29 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A6 SHUTTLE IDENTITY SHUTTLE IDENTITY SIGN TYPE A6 SHUTTLE IDENTITY PROPOSED = 5.3 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 5.3 SF GRADE SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”3 SIDE VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”4 TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”5 A. SIGN MASSING Exterior Amenity signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. UPDATED 03/09/2023 8” 8'-0" 43 all rights reserved 2022 30 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 QTY: DESCRIPTION 2 A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum E. Concrete base with below grade foundation B. 3/16” Laser cut adhered to polycarbonate face H. 1/4” Thick white polycarbonate inset 1/2” from face of frame C. 1/4” Thick plate under polycarbonate face G. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging D. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer F. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation A6 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A6 SHUTTLE IDENTITY PROPOSED = 5.3 SF TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”5 G SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 SHUTTLE IDENTITY 8” 7'-3" 9” 8'-0" 8” 6'-9" 1'-3" 8” 9” 7'-3" 8'-0" A 7 1/4" 2 1/2” 6” 8” 6” 1'-3" B C D E F H UPDATED 03/09/2023 44 all rights reserved 2022 31 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A7 EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY SIGN TYPE A7 EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY PROPOSED = 3.3 SF FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 3.3 SF GATEWAY CAFEGATEWAY CAFEGRADE SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 8” 5'-0" 8” 5'-0" TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”5 A. SIGN MASSING Exterior Amenity signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. UPDATED 03/09/2023 45 all rights reserved 2022 32 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY B ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”1 EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY GATEWAY CAFE8” 4'-3" 9” 5'-0" 1'-3" 3'-9" 8” FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:1”=1’-0”3 8” 4'-3" 9” 5'-0"GATEWAY CAFEQTY: DESCRIPTION 4 B. 3/16” Laser cut adhered to polycarbonate face A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum E. Concrete base with below grade foundation D. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer F. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation C. 1/4” Thick plate under polycarbonate face G. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging H. Steel support with threaded cap for attachment of cabinet as required per sign contractor’s engineer I. White polycarbonate inset 1/2” from face of frame J. LED system as required to provide even illumination. No hot spots. A7 SIGN TYPE in accordance with the requirements This sign is intended to be installed of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. SIGN TYPE A7 EXTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY PROPOSED = 3.3 SF TOP VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”5 2 1/2” 6” 8” 7” 6” 1'-3" D E F A B G A SIDE VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”2 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:1”=1’-0”4 1/2” 3/16" SECTION B scale: 3”=1’-0”7 A J H I B SECTION A scale: 3”=1’-0”6 A B I J H C 46 all rights reserved 2022 33 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A8 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGN TYPE A8 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS PROPOSED = 6.9 SF GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 4'-6" 1'-6" RULES AND REGULATIONS NO TRESPASSING PRIVATE PROPERTY PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER VIDEO SURVEILLANCE. NO TRESPASSING, LOITERING, OR 1/2” SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 A. SIGN MASSING Rules and regulations signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS 6.9 SF SOLICITING. PENAL CODE SEC. 602. UPDATED 03/09/2023 47 all rights reserved 2022 34 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS QTY: DESCRIPTION 5 E. Eased corners A. 1/2” Thick aluminum plate embedded into concrete footing as required F. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging D. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation B. Direct print copy with clear coat C. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer A8 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A8 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS PROPOSED = 6.9 SF GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”1 RULES AND REGULATIONS NO TRESPASSING PRIVATE PROPERTY PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER VIDEO SURVEILLANCE. NO TRESPASSING, LOITERING, OR 2 3/4” 1'-6" 3 1/2” 1 1/2” 1” 1 1/2” 2 1/2” 10” 3” 2 1/2” 3/4”1/2” 3'-5" 4'-6" SIDE VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”2 1/2” 3” 1 1/4” TOP VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”3 A B B C D E F SOLICITING. PENAL CODE SEC. 602. UPDATED 03/09/2023 48 all rights reserved 2022 35 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A9 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY SERVICE AREA IDENTITY SIGN TYPE A9 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY PROPOSED = 6.9 SF GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 4'-6" 1'-6" SERVICE AREA 1/2” SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 A. SIGN MASSING Service area signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. 6.9 SF 49 all rights reserved 2022 36 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS SERVICE AREA IDENTITY QTY: DESCRIPTION 8 F. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging E. Eased corners D. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation A. 1/2” Thick aluminum plate embedded into concrete footing as required B. Direct print copy with clear coat C. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer A9 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE A9 SERVICE AREA PROPOSED = 6.9 SF GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”1 SERVICE AREA 2 3/4” 1'-6" 3 1/2” 1 1/2” 1” 1 1/2” 2 1/2” 10” 3” 3'-5" 4'-6" SIDE VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”2 1/2” 3” 1 1/4” TOP VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”3 A B E F C D 50 all rights reserved 2022 37 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE A10 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE STOP SIGN - REGULATORY SIGN scale: 1/2”=1’-0”1 SIGN TYPE A10 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE PROPOSED = 2 SF STOP PARKING ONLY MINIMUM FINE$250 6'-8" 2'-0" 1/4” 3” 8'-5" 6'-8" 1'-6" 1/4” 2” 8'-0" A. DESIGN INTENT Parking Regulatory is a sign to inform the visitor about the parking regulations for the vehicles in the property. Sign Type A10 is a vehicular sign and should be designed and located in such a way as to effectively communicate its content to vehicular traffic through the parking lot. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Final designs for Sign Type A10 will be developed to comply with the guidelines outlined within this Project Criteria. Final designs for Sign Type A10 should conform to all general design Guidelines as outlined in Section 2.A of this document C. SIGN MASSING The requirement for the sign is: • Minimum 1” for text height. An exemption has been made for this sign type - allowing a maximum sign area of 4 sq ft - single sided to accommodate the amount of information required on this all-encompasing regulatory sign. * This sign does not count toward maximum number of allowable ground signs. ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE D. VARIATION Final design for Sign Type A10 should contain no (or very minimal) variation in size or layout to provide for maximum recognition and wayfinding effectiveness. E. SIGN LOCATION Sign Type A10 will be located to mark proximity to the building’s functional entry or access to a parking structure used by the building. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with sight distance analyses based on 10’ clear sight distance at project driveways and adjacent intersections. 2 SF FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW BACK VIEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING - REGULATORY SIGN scale: 1/2”=1’-0”2 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW BACK VIEW 51 all rights reserved 2022 38 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE QTY: DESCRIPTION 4 A. Direct print blue P5 and green P6 field and reflective vinyl pictogram, clear coat after application of graphics. B. 1/8” Thick painted aluminum panel. Panel to be plug welded to post, filled, sanded, and ground smooth prior to paint and application of graphics F. Aluminum panel to be plug welded to post E. Cap welded in place, filled, ground smooth prior to paint. No visible fasteners or seams G. 3”x 3” painted P1 aluminum tube with footing as required by sign fabricator’s engineering D. 2”x 2” painted P1 aluminum tube with footing as required by sign fabricator’s engineering C. Direct copy and clear coat after application of graphics, Fabricator to verify design meets all local code and ADA requirements A10 SIGN TYPE PARKING ONLY MINIMUM FINE $250 FRONT VIEW scale:3”=1’-0”1 5/8”8 3/4” 5/8” 10” 5” 1” 1” 1” 1” 1/2” 3/4” 3/8” 3/4” 8 3/4” 3/4”1'-6" Align A B C D E F SIDE VIEW scale:3”=1’-0”2 STOP FRONT VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”3 9” 6” 9” 2'-0" 2'-0" 1/4” 2” 2” 1/4” 3” 3” SIDE VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”4 D B C E F 3” 2” SIGN TYPE A10 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE PROPOSED = 2 SF 52 all rights reserved 2022 39 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE PARKING ONLY MINIMUM FINE $250 MESSAGES scale:3”=1’-0”1 5/8”8 3/4” 5/8” 10” 5” 1” 1” 1” 1” 1/2” 3/4” 3/8” 3/4” 8 3/4” 3/4”1'-6" Align 2” VAN ACCESSIBLE MINIMUM FINE $250 5/8”8 3/4” 5/8” 10” 5” 1” 1” 1” 1” 1/2” 3/4” 3/8” 3/4” 8 3/4” 3/4”1'-6" Align 2” ELECTRICAL VEHICLE 5/8”8 3/4” 5/8” 10” 5” 1” 1” 1” 1/2” 8 3/4” 3/4”1'-6" Align 2” 1” 1/2”PARKING 53 all rights reserved 2022 40 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN TYPE B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL PROPOSED = 8.375 SF FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 8.375 SF SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 GRADE TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 901 LAWN 801 PARKING AMENITY 18'-0" 5'-7" 901 LAWN 801 951 PARKING AMENITY 951 4” A. SIGN MASSING Monument signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. NOTE: TEXT IS PLACEHOLDER. FINAL COPY TBD. UPDATED 03/09/2023 54 all rights reserved 2022 41 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL ELEVATIONS QTY: DESCRIPTION 7 G. Painted P3 accent inset 1/2” from face to side frame I. Painted P8 accent inset 1 1/2” from face of side frame. H. Painted P7 accent inset 1” from face of the side frame B. Direct print graphics with clear coat A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum C. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer F. Where sign is located in soft-scape: crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging D. Concrete base with below grade foundation E. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify grade prior to fabrication and installation B1 SIGN TYPE GRADE FRONT VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”1 SIDE VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”2 901 LAWN 801 951 PARKING AMENITY 2”1'-2"2” 1'-6" 2” 6”8” 4'-8" 5'-4" 3” 8” 2 1/4” 1 1/2”1” 1”1 1/2” 1 1/2” 1 1/2”1” 1”1 1/2” 1 1/2” A 4” TOP VIEW scale:1”=1’-0”3 SECTION A scale:3”=1’-0”4 1/2” 1” 1/2” 1 3/4” 3” 4” 2” A B C D E F G H I SIGN TYPE B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL PROPOSED = 8.375 SF NOTE: TEXT IS PLACEHOLDER. FINAL COPY TBD. UPDATED 03/09/2023 55 all rights reserved 2022 42 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE B2 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY SIGN TYPE B2 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY PROPOSED = 18 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”1 18 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”2 BACK VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”3 GRADE RENDERING scale:NTS5TOP VIEW scale:1/4”=1’-0”4 THEGATEWAY 801951 901 751 2'-0" 9'-0" 7 1/2” THEGATEWAY 801951 901 751 A. SIGN MASSING Monument signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. 56 all rights reserved 2022 43 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY B ELEVATIONSPEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY FRONT VIEW scale: 3/4”=1’-0”1 GRADE SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 FRONT VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 SIDE VIEW - DETAIL scale:3/4”=1’-0”5 QTY: DESCRIPTION 4 H. Where sign is located in soft-scape: Crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging F. Concrete base with below grade foundation G. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation. A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum B. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated C. Notch to house linear light fixture to wash up angled face D. Removable panel with direct print map E. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer I. Painted P3 accent inset 1” from face to side frame J. Internally illuminated acrylic accent inset 2” from face of side frame K. Painted P8 accent inset 3” from face of side frame. B2 SIGN TYPE THE GATEWAY 801 951 901 751 2'-0" 1'-6" 4” 6 1/2” 3'-6" 2'-9 1/2" 4” 9'-0" 8” 6'-6" 1'-6" 4” 7 1/2” THE GATEWAY 801 951 901 751 2”2”1'-8" 2'-0" 2” 2”1 1/4”2” 3 1/2” 2” 2”1 1/4” 2” 1'-6" 1 1/2” A A B C D E F G H TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 1 1/4” 3 3/4” 6” 7 1/2” I J K I J K SIGN TYPE B2 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY PROPOSED = 18 SF 57 all rights reserved 2022 44 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILSPEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY SECTION A scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”6 A B C D F E 1” 1” 1” QTY: DESCRIPTION 4 A. Steel support as required per sign contractor’s engineer C. Push through flush white acrylic M2, internally illuminated H. Notch to house LED system to washup angled face E. Internally illuminated acrylic accent with first surface applied translucent vinyl inset 2” from face of side frame D. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required B. LED system as required to provide even illumination F. Removable face and back panels mechanically fastened to internal frame with stainless steel socket drive c/s flat head screws painted to match adjacent color G. Push through 1/4” proud white acrylic M2, internally illuminated B2 SIGN TYPE in accordance with the requirements This sign is intended to be installed of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. H F SECTION B scale: 1 1/2”=1’-0”7 D B G C B SIGN TYPE B2 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY PROPOSED = 18 SF 58 all rights reserved 2022 45 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE T2 ADDRESS ID SIGN TYPE T2 ADDRESS ID PROPOSED = 4.75 SF A. DESIGN INTENT Address Ids are intended to identify the major Tenants in a prominent way from a larger or campus-wide view. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Final designs for Address ID will be developed to comply with the guidelines outlined within this Master Sign Plan Criteria. Final designs for Sign Address ID with Cladding should conform to all general design Guidelines. C. SIGN MASSING Sign shall not be attached to an extend building or be located above the roofline of the building to which it is attached. Sign in C-3 District shall not exceed 100 feet from the ground and Sign in C,M, and PDR District shall not exceed 60 feet from the ground. Such sign may contains letters, numbers, a logo, service mark and/or trademark and may be Nonilluminated or Indirectly Illuminated. D. VARIATION Final design for this sign should contain no (or very minimal) variation in size or layout to provide for maximum recognition and wayfinding effectiveness. UPDATED 02/12/2023 69569518" FRONT VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”1 MAX 4.75 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”2 1/2” MAX 38" 695695 TYP. INSTALL ELEVATION scale:1/8”=1’-0”3 220" 7” 59 all rights reserved 2022 46 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILSADDRESS ID QTY: DESCRIPTION 11 B. Threaded studs and silicone adhesive A. 1/2” Deep TCO aluminum (M1) numbers, finish Silver Metallic P9, mounted on the existing wall. T2 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE T2 ADDRESS ID PROPOSED = 4.75 SF 69569518" FRONT VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”1 MAX 38" A SIDE VIEW scale:1 1/2”=1’-0”2 1/2” B 695695 TYP. INSTALL ELEVATION scale:1/4”=1’-0”3 38” 18” 7” 220" UPDATED 02/12/2023 60 all rights reserved 2022 47 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE P1 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID SIGN TYPE P1 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID PROPOSED = 9.67 SF A. DESIGN INTENT Building Mounted Entrance Ids are intended to identify the major Parking areas in a prominent way from a larger or campus-wide view. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Final designs for Building Mounted Entrance ID will be developed to comply with the guidelines outlined within this Master Sign Plan Criteria. Final designs for Sign Building Mounted Entrance ID should conform to all general design Guidelines. C. SIGN MASSING Sign shall not be attached to an extend building or be located above the roofline of the building to which it is attached. Sign in C-3 District shall not exceed 100 feet from the ground and Sign in C,M, and PDR District shall not exceed 60 feet from the ground. Such sign may contains letters, numbers, a logo, service mark and/or trademark and may be Nonilluminated or Indirectly Illuminated. D. VARIATION Final design for this sign should contain no (or very minimal) variation in size or layout to provide for maximum recognition and wayfinding effectiveness. UPDATED 03/09/2023 FRONT VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”2 FRONT ELEVATION scale:3/16”=1’-0”3 13 1/2”2'-0" 8'-8" 10'-8" MAX 9.67 SF TOP VIEW scale:1/2”=1’-0”1 2'-0" VARIES V.I.F VARIES V.I.F 61 all rights reserved 2022 48 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS QTY: DESCRIPTION 6 C. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required. A. Panel area to be centered over inbound drive aisle. Overall dimensions will vary per location. Sign fabricator to survey prior to fabricator. E. Light channel and lens in bottom of cabinet to down-light driveway. B. Notch to house LED system to wash up angled face D. 1/2” Proud push through white acrylic, internally illuminated. P1 SIGN TYPE TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 UPDATED 03/09/2023 SIGN TYPE P1 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID PROPOSED = 9.67 SF in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. This sign is intended to be installed BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID 3” 4” FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 10'-8" 13 1/2"2'-0" 10” 1/2” A B CD 10'-0" 2” 2” ETOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 62 all rights reserved 2022 49 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO RENDERING UPDATED 03/09/2023BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID 63 all rights reserved 2022 50 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE P2 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID SIGN TYPE P2 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID PROPOSED = 12 SF UPDATED 03/09/2023 TOP VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”4 A. SIGN MASSING Monument signs are in C-2 District shall not exceed 36 feet, and in all other C, M and PDR District shall not exceed 40 feet. The height of such signs shall be measured from the top of the nearest public street curb. Signs located near street corners and driveways may be referred to the City’s traffic engineer for determinations regarding appropriate vehicle sight clearances. B. VARIATION Final placement, orientation and dimensions of this sign type may vary slightly from location to location and dependent on final architectural conditions. The overall mass and total sign area should remain consistent with this document. C. SIGN LOCATION Signs will be located as per the location plans in this document. Exact sign location to be determined based on final sign design and shape, and to comply with the City’s sign triangle and traffic view area. FRONT VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”1 BACK VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”3 2'-0" 6'-0" 12 SF GRADE SIDE VIEW scale:3/4”=1’-0”2 6” RENDERING scale:NTS5 64 all rights reserved 2022 51 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY P2 SIGN TYPE UPDATED 03/09/2023FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID QTY: DESCRIPTION 10 A. Fabricated aluminum cabinet with internal structural frame as required 1/8” thick skin minimum E. Minimum 6” sign fabricator to verify final grade prior to fabrication and installation. G. Painted P3 accent inset 1/2” from face to side frame F. Where sign is located in soft-scape: Crushed granite rock bed with aluminum edging H. Painted P7 accent inset 1” from face to side frame C. Below grade concrete footing as required per sign contractor’s engineer D. Concrete base with below grade foundation I. Painted P8 accent inset 1 1/2” from face of side frame. B. Applied reflective vinyl graphic with clear coat SIGN TYPE P2 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID PROPOSED = 12 SF ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FRONT VIEW scale: 1”=1’-0”1 1 3/4”1 3/4” 2'-0" 5”9”12” 3” 1 3/4” 1 1/2” 4'-3" 6” 5'-6" 6'-0" 6” SIDE VIEW scale: 1”=1’-0”2 TOP VIEW scale: 1”=1’-0”3 A DETAIL A scale: 3”=1’-0”4 5” 1/2” 1/2” 6” 3” 1 1/8” 3”1 1/4" A F B B C D E G H I 65 all rights reserved 2022 52 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY SIGN TYPE T1 TENANT ID SIGN TYPE T1 TENANT ID PROPOSED = 420 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/8”=1’-0”1 MAX 420 SF SIDE VIEW scale:1/8”=1’-0”2 A. DESIGN INTENT Tenant IDs are intended to identify the major Tenants in a prominent way from a larger or campus-wide view. B. DESIGN CRITERIA Final designs for Tenant ID will be developed to comply with the guidelines outlined within this Master Sign Plan Criteria. Final designs for Sign Tenant ID with Cladding should conform to all general design Guidelines. C. SIGN MASSING Sign shall not be attached to an extend building or be located above the roofline of the building to which it is attached. Sign in C-3 District shall not exceed 100 feet from the ground and Sign in C,M, and PDR District shall not exceed 60 feet from the ground. Such sign may contains letters, numbers, a logo, service mark and/or trademark and may be Nonilluminated or Indirectly Illuminated. D. VARIATION Final design for this sign should contain no (or very minimal) variation in size or layout to provide for maximum recognition and wayfinding effectiveness. TENANT120” MAX 504”4”-8” REFERENCES scale:NTS3 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) UPDATED 10/13/2023 66 all rights reserved 2022 53 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILSTENANT ID QTY: DESCRIPTION 21 B. Mechanically attached to wall with tapcon concrete anchor A. Fabricated aluminum channel lettering with face illumination, painted TBD T1 SIGN TYPE SIGN TYPE T1 TENANT ID PROPOSED = 420 SF FRONT VIEW scale:1/8”=1’-0”1 SIDE VIEW scale:1/8”=1’-0”2 TENANT120” MAX 504”4”-8” BACK VIEW scale:1/8”=1’-0”3 TENANT120” A ELECTRICAL HOLES SCREW HOLES 4” FABRICATED ALUMINUM LETTER H/O WHITE LEDS 1/4” LEXAN WITH TRANSLUCENT VINYL OVERLAY 110V-277V UL LISTED POWER SUPPLY WITHIN ENCLOSED RACEWAY DISCONNECT SWITCH & PHOTOCELL CONTROL WATERPROOF SILICONE SEALANT AT ALL WALL PENETRATIONS SIDE VIEW - ELECTRICAL DETAIL scale: 1” = 1’-0”4 WALL TO 110V-277V POWER SOURCE (BY OTHERS) WITH DEDICATED 20 AMP CIRCUIT, PHOTOCELL, AND TIMER FOR FINAL PERMIT INSPECTION 1/4” DIA. X 3” TAPCON CONCRETE ANCHOR OR #8 X 3” WOOD SCREW WEEP HOLES ON BOTTOM OF LETTERFORM TO PREVENT LIGHT LEAKS of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 67 all rights reserved 2022 54 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONTENANT ID 137’-6” NORTH ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: 1/24” = 1’-0”1 504” 120” KEY PLAN scale: NTSA 134’-0” (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 68 all rights reserved 2022 55 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONTENANT ID 286’-0” EAST ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: 1/24” = 1’-0”2 504” 120” KEY PLAN scale: NTSA 135’-6” (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 69 all rights reserved 2022 56 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONTENANT ID 137’-6” SOUTH ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: 1/24” = 1’-0”3 504” 120” KEY PLAN scale: NTSA 134’-0” (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 70 all rights reserved 2022 57 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY ELEVATIONTENANT ID 286’-0” WEST ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: 1/24” = 1’-0”4 504” 120” KEY PLAN scale: NTSA 135’-6” (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 71 all rights reserved 2022 58 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA01a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 72 all rights reserved 2022 59 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA01b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 73 all rights reserved 2022 60 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA02a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 74 all rights reserved 2022 61 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 751 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA02b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 75 all rights reserved 2022 62 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 901 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA03a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 76 all rights reserved 2022 63 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 901 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA03b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 77 all rights reserved 2022 64 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 901 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA04a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 78 all rights reserved 2022 65 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 901 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA04b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 79 all rights reserved 2022 66 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 951 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA05a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 80 all rights reserved 2022 67 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 951 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA05b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 81 all rights reserved 2022 68 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 951 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA06a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 82 all rights reserved 2022 69 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 951 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA06b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 83 all rights reserved 2022 70 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 701 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA09a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 84 all rights reserved 2022 71 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 701 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA09b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 85 all rights reserved 2022 72 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 701 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA10a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 86 all rights reserved 2022 73 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 701 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA10b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 87 all rights reserved 2022 74 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 681 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA11a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 88 all rights reserved 2022 75 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 681 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA11b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 89 all rights reserved 2022 76 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 681 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA12a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 90 all rights reserved 2022 77 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 681 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA12b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 91 all rights reserved 2022 78 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 685 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA13a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 92 all rights reserved 2022 79 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 685 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA13b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 93 all rights reserved 2022 80 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 651 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA14 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 94 all rights reserved 2022 81 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 651 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA15 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 95 all rights reserved 2022 82 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 651 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA07 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 96 all rights reserved 2022 83 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 651 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA08 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 97 all rights reserved 2022 84 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 611 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA16a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 98 all rights reserved 2022 85 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 611 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA16b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 99 all rights reserved 2022 86 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 611 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA17a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 100 all rights reserved 2022 87 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 611 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA17b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 101 all rights reserved 2022 88 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 601 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA18a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 102 all rights reserved 2022 89 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID NORTH ELEVATION - 601 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA18b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 103 all rights reserved 2022 90 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID WEST ELEVATION - 601 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA19a (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 104 all rights reserved 2022 91 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 601 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA19b (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 105 all rights reserved 2022 92 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID SOUTH ELEVATION - 555 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA20 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 106 all rights reserved 2022 93 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY PHOTO ELEVATIONTENANT ID EAST ELEVATION - 555 GATEWAY scale: NTS KEY PLAN scale: NTSA21 (HIGH-RISE BUILDING) 107 all rights reserved 2022 94 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY LOCATION PLAN INTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY qty:4 A7 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS qty:5 A8 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY qty:8 A9 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE qty:4 A10 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON qty:5 A2 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING qty:15 A3 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL qty:19 A4 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL qty:7 B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY qty:4 B2 TENANT ID ( High-Rise Building) qty:19 T1 ADDRESS ID qty:11 T2 UPDATED 03/09/2023 PRIMARY MONUMENT (Center IDs) qty:2 A1 SHUTTLE IDENTITY qty:2 A6 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY qty:2 A5 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID qty:10 P2 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID qty:6 P1 751 701601 685 681559 611 651 PARKING 801 951 901 A9 08 A7 04 B2 04 B1 07 PARKINGPARKING 555 FUTURE FUTURE A7 03 A8 05 A8 04 A8 03 A1 01 A1 02 A5 01A502 A6 02 A6 01 A7 02 A7 01 A8 02A801 A9 07 A9 06 A9 04 A9 05 A9 02 A9 03 A9 01 B2 03 B2 01 B2 02 B1 06 B1 03B101 B1 02 B1 05B104 N 108 all rights reserved 2022 95 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY LOCATION PLAN INTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY qty:4 A7 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS qty:5 A8 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY qty:8 A9 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE qty:4 A10 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON qty:5 A2 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING qty:15 A3 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL qty:19 A4 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL qty:7 B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY qty:4 B2 TENANT ID ( High-Rise Building) qty:19 T1 ADDRESS ID qty:11 T2 UPDATED 07/11/2023 PRIMARY MONUMENT (Center IDs) qty:2 A1 SHUTTLE IDENTITY qty:2 A6 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY qty:2 A5 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID qty:10 P2 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID qty:6 P1 751 701601 685 681559 611 651 PARKING 801 951 901 T1 02b T1 02a T1 01a T1 01b PARKINGPARKING 555 FUTURE FUTURE T1 03a T1 04a T1 03b T1 04b T1 05a T1 05b T1 06a T1 06b T1 09a T1 09b T1 10a T1 10b T1 11a T1 12a T1 11b T1 12b T1 13a T1 13b T1 14 T1 08 T1 15T107 T1 16a T1 16b T1 17aT117b T1 18a T1 18b T1 19a T1 19b N T1 20 T1 21 109 all rights reserved 2022 96 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY LOCATION PLAN INTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY qty:4 A7 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS qty:5 A8 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY qty:8 A9 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE qty:4 A10 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON qty:5 A2 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING qty:15 A3 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL qty:19 A4 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL qty:7 B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY qty:4 B2 TENANT ID ( High-Rise Building) qty:19 T1 ADDRESS ID qty:11 T2 UPDATED 03/09/2023 PRIMARY MONUMENT (Center IDs) qty:2 A1 SHUTTLE IDENTITY qty:2 A6 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY qty:2 A5 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID qty:10 P2 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID qty:6 P1 751 701601 685 681559 611 651 PARKING 801 951 901 A4 13 A2 04 A4 16 A4 15 A3 12 A3 11 A4 14 A3 15 A4 19 A4 18 A4 17 PARKINGPARKING 555 FUTURE FUTURE A2 05 A2 01 A2 02 A2 03 A3 01 A3 02 A3 03 A3 04 A3 05 A3 06 A3 07 A3 08 A3 09 A3 10 A3 14 A3 13 A4 01 A4 02 A4 05 A4 06 A4 03 A4 04 A4 09 A4 10 A4 12 A4 11 A4 07 A4 08 N 110 all rights reserved 2022 97 SIGN SYSTEMS www.corporatesigns.com CONTRACTOR’S LIC# 765078 CLASS C45-ELECTRICAL SIGN CONTRACTOR 408.292.1600 2464 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 ALEXANDRIAOCTOBER 13, 2023MASTER SIGN PROGRAM: THE GATEWAYTHE GATEWAY LOCATION PLAN UPDATED 03/09/2023 751 701601 685 681559 611 651 PARKING 801 951 901 PARKINGPARKING 555 FUTURE FUTURE P1 01 P1 02 P1 03 P1 04 P1 05 P1 06 P2 01 P2 02 P2 03 P2 04 P2 05 P2 06 P2 07 P2 08 P2 09 P2 10 INTERIOR AMENITY IDENTITY qty:4 A7 EXTERIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS qty:5 A8 SERVICE AREA IDENTITY qty:8 A9 ENHANCED REGULATORY SIGNAGE qty:4 A10 TENANT IDENTITY PYLON qty:5 A2 FREESTANDING TENANT LISTING qty:15 A3 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL qty:19 A4 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL qty:7 B1 PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY qty:4 B2 TENANT ID ( High-Rise Building) qty:19 T1 ADDRESS ID qty:11 T2 PRIMARY MONUMENT (Center IDs) qty:2 A1 SHUTTLE IDENTITY qty:2 A6 TAXI/RIDESHARE IDENTITY qty:2 A5 FREESTANDING/BLADE ENTRY ID qty:10 P2 BUILDING MOUNTED ENTRANCE ID qty:6 P1 N 111 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve application for Design Review for a new Aquatic Center at Orange Memorial Park,and adopt the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005)in accordance with the California Public Resources Code and the California Environmental Quality Act.(Philip Vitale,Deputy Director -Capital Projects,and Adena Friedman,Chief Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and take the following actions: 1.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005),in accordance with Section 21080 of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 et seq.; and 2.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve Design Review (DR23-0037), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. MOTIONS FOR THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) Move to adopt the resolution recommending adoption of the IS/MND (2) Move to adopt the resolution recommending approval of planning entitlements. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center project (Project)proposes to build a aquatic center to replace the existing Orange Pool,South San Francisco’s only municipal swimming pool.The existing Orange Pool opened in 1970,it continues to serve as a community-wide destination for residents of all ages.Despite the City’s attentive custodianship of the building,overall,the building’s age and heavy use have resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior. The facility is well beyond the point of meriting replacement. In April 2021,staff presented to the City Council Budget Standing Committee the findings from a 2016 Wong and Logan Feasibility Study for a new aquatic center along with recommendation of the construction of a new two-pool facility.In May 2021,staff engaged Group4 Architects from the City’s on-call architecture firm list to explore alternative Aquatic Center locations within Orange Memorial Park and validate construction costs. City Council directed staff to locate the new facility at the corner of Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive,adjacent to the existing pool to allow for ongoing operation of the existing pool while the new facility is constructed. Working from the two-pool facility approach identified in the Wong and Logan study,Group4 refined the program to include an 8-lane 25-meter lap pool,separate teaching pool,swimmer’s lounge,rentable multi- City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™112 File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. program to include an 8-lane 25-meter lap pool,separate teaching pool,swimmer’s lounge,rentable multi- use/party room,staff offices,locker rooms and support spaces for mechanical equipment within a 28,500 square-foot single-story facility. In February 2022,City Council authorized the execution of a professional services agreement with ELS Architecture and Urban Design for design,construction documentation and construction administration for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center project. The Project will construct a new facility at the corner of Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive,adjacent to the existing Orange Pool.Operation of the existing Orange Pool will continue through construction of the new facility.Once construction of the new facility is complete,the old pool and building will be demolished and replaced with a small parking lot and drop-off area. Project Location The Project site consists of 6.5 acres (283,140 square feet)located at 1 West Orange Avenue (APN 014-041- 160).The project site is located within the larger 26.9-acre Orange Memorial Park,the largest developed park within the City of South San Francisco and managed by the City’s Park and Recreation Department.The project site is bounded by Tennis Drive to the North,West Orange Avenue to the East and Orange Memorial Park to the South and West. Project Description The project would demolish the existing 22-space parking lot and a portion of existing grass soccer fields in the northeast portion of Orange Memorial Park along W.Orange Avenue and construct a new 23,070 SF aquatic center southeast of the existing Orange Memorial Pool.The facility would include a new building with an indoor pool and an attached outdoor pool.The single-story facility for the indoor pool would be approximately 30 feet in height and would contain an approximately 5,200 SF seven-lane indoor pool with a surrounding 2,920 SF pool deck.The pool would contain a volume of 173,264 gallons.Separate men’s,women’s and family locker /changing rooms and restroom areas,staff changing and restroom areas,approximately 400 square feet of office space,a 800-square foot activity room and lobby,storage,and mechanical space would also be constructed within the new center.An approximately 6,287 SF,ten-lane outdoor pool with a volume of 283,956 gallons would be constructed adjacent to the center and to the south.The outdoor pool would have a surrounding 3,240 SF pool deck,pool storage and bleachers and would be fenced by 15-foot-tall composite wood fencing.The project would construct a new 13-space parking lot with 5 ADA-accessible and 3 electric vehicle (EV)charging spaces and relocate an existing Eternal Flame sculpture and memorial plaques to a new ADA-accessible plaza. Project plans are attached as Exhibit A to the associated Entitlements Resolution. Building Architecture The proposed exterior materials for the aquatic center include painted cement plaster and composite wood cladding,with accent exterior glass detailing.The exterior materials palette primarily consists of a pre-finished “weathered steel”metal panel,composite wood cladding,and glazing.The proposed metal panel would be complementary to the color palette of the adjacent James A.Fernekes Building.In addition,the project would incorporate blue and aqua colors which are sprinkled through the building in the form of blue accent glazing, City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™113 File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. incorporate blue and aqua colors which are sprinkled through the building in the form of blue accent glazing, aqua colored cement plaster and aqua colored signage.The exterior pool metal fencing would be painted dark bronze. Landscaping and Open Space The Project’s landscaping and site improvements will knit the new aquatics center within the existing Orange Park.A new entry plaza and pathways will connect the new aquatics center with a new parking lot and Veterans Memorial plaza.The arcing pathway that leads to the Veterans Memorial is intended to extend to other park facilities in the future,as part of the overall Orange Park Master Plan.The Veterans Memorial will feature a flagpole,dedication plaques,a restored Eternal Flame sculpture,and will provide a seating area that can be used for reflection and contemplation. At the arrival of Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive,the project proposes additional palm trees to continue the language of the Previti palms that currently exist along Tennis Drive.The overall landscape planting palette also includes evergreen canopy trees,deciduous canopy trees,lawn,ornamental grasses,shrub planting and stormwater treatment grasses. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The new Aquatic Center is consistent with,and helps to achieve many of the Parks and Recreation goals and policies in the City’s General Plan, including: Goal PR-1:South San Francisco equitably provides improved parkland,recreational facilities,and services for all residents. Policy PR-1.3:Design parks and facilities to meet universal access standards.Design parks and recreation facilities for universal access and multi-generational use,encouraging play by residents of all abilities and ages. Continue to improve existing parks and open spaces to accommodate the needs of users of all ages and abilities. The General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District for Orange Memorial Park is Parks and Recreation (PR),which is intended for parks and recreation complexes,intended to provide locations for a variety of recreational activities to meet the community’s diverse needs.Development of the new aquatic center is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Zoning. COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROCESS Community engagement for the Aquatic Center commenced in April 2022,with three workshops and online surveys.Conceptual Design of the project was completed in September 2022 resulting in a design that included an indoor 7-lane pool and outdoor 10-lane pool.In October 2022 Schematic Design commenced,detailing the size and function of the two pools as well as the layout and size of the natatorium.The Schematic Design Phase concluded in December 2022.With input received during presentations to the Parks and Recreation Commission,City Council and engagement with the South San Francisco Aquatics Club,a list of design revisions which maintained the Aquatic Center program while reducing cost were developed and incorporated into construction documentation and final design of the project. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™114 File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The South San Francisco Design Review Board (DRB)reviewed the proposed Project on two occasions.First was during the March 21,2023 meeting and the DRB provided comments and requested a more activated area behind the outdoor pool windscreen with a pedestrian walkway or seating areas to engage and activate the area; addition of some articulation to the windscreen wall facing out toward the playing fields to help break up the long flat wall using some different material finishes;review the corner element where the aquatic sign is being proposed,as the area looks unbalanced and with a disconnected appearance;consider planting the trees around the pool further back to keep the winds from blowing the leaves into the outdoor pool and creating maintenance issues. On June 20,2023,the DRB reviewed a subsequent revision to plans and was uniformly supportive of the design edits and presentation to address previous comments.During this meeting,the DRB deemed that the revisions to the Project addressed previous comments,and recommended approval with the following comments and conditions: a.The Board liked the revised plan concept with the warm color palette. b.Consider using the same material finishes on all the elevations,including the proposed wind screen wall. c.The proposed landscaping plan will work for the site and recommends not overusing the Native Sycamore trees for this site as they can easily become disfigured. d.Recommend Approval with conditions and can proceed to Planning Commission for future hearing. Following the June 20,2023,DRB meeting,the applicant submitted revised plans which became part of the entitlements package under review.DRB comments letters from both meetings are included as Attachment 1 to this staff report. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City,with assistance from SWCA Environmental Consultants prepared an Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)(State Clearinghouse #2023090168)for the proposed project (Associated CEQA Resolution,Exhibit A).It was circulated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)for 30 days to state and other reviewing agencies/jurisdictions,and interested parties,from September 8, 2023, through October 9, 2023. The IS/MND finds that the following resources could potentially result in impacts due to the proposed Project: Air Quality,Biological Resources,Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources,Geology and Soils,Hazards and Hazardous Materials,and Transportation.However,mitigation measures are proposed that would ensure the potential impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. The proposed mitigation measures are typical for a modern construction project and detailed within the IS/MND.These required mitigations are incorporated into the Project through a Condition of Approval requiring compliance with the mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND and reflected on the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Associated CEQA Resolution,Exhibit B).The City will ensure that all City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™115 File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. Monitoring and Reporting Program (Associated CEQA Resolution,Exhibit B).The City will ensure that all required mitigation measures are incorporated during project construction. Comments on the IS/MND The comment period on the IS/MND closed on October 9,2023.Two comment letters were received during the comment period, as listed below: •Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System Email:Advisement of proximity of SFPUC’s water transmission pipeline located in Orange Avenue public right-of-way adjacent to Project Site,dated September 25, 2023 •State Clearinghouse Email:Advisement no mailed hard copies of Public Notices can be accepted; future notices to be emailed: Email dated September 26, 2023 In summary,the comments received by Staff have not raised any issues that would require recirculation of the IS/MND or preparation of an environmental impact report under sections 15073.5 and 15074.1 of the CEQA Guidelines as no new significant effects were identified,no new mitigation measures were added and proposed revisions to the mitigation measures would result in measures that are equivalent or more effective,the significance of identified impacts remains unchanged,and all impacts are either below significance levels or reduced to that level through application of identified mitigation. CONCLUSION The proposed Aquatic Center project has been reviewed substantially by City Departments,Commissions and Boards and the City Council.The Planning Commission action for this phase of the project development is to find the project consistent with zoning and environmental review.The new Aquatic Center will deliver a state- of-the art facility for the City of South San Francisco and has been designed with extensive community input and support. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005),in accordance with Section 21080 of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 et seq.; and 2.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve Design Review (DR23-0037), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Attachment 1.Design Review Board (DRB) Comment Letters (March and June, 2023) Associated Resolutions and Exhibits 1.Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center CEQA Resolution (File ID#23-956) A.Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration B.Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™116 File #:23-952 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3. 2.Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Entitlements Resolution (File ID#23-957) A.Draft Conditions of Approval B.Project Plan Set City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™117 118 119 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-956 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3a. Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005)for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center in accordance with Section 21080 of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 et seq. WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco (“Applicant”)has proposed the construction of a new aquatic center in a 6.5-acre site within in Orange Memorial Park referred to as “Project Site”in the City consisting of a new building with an indoor pool and an attached outdoor pool (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks approval of a Design Review Permit (DR23-0037) for the Project; and WHEREAS,approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project”for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS,on behalf of the City,SWCA Environmental Consultants prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”)for the Project (ND23-0005)analyzing the potential environmental effects of the Project,which was submitted to the State Clearinghouse (SCH No.2023090168)and the San Mateo County Clerk and was circulated for a 30-day public review period,beginning on September 8,2023,and ending on October 9, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City received two comment letters on the IS/MND during the applicable comment period; and WHEREAS,the City determined that the comments identified during the comment period do not result in new significant impacts or mitigation measures, or change impact conclusions; and WHEREAS,the City determined that responses to comments and corrections to the IS/MND do not require recirculation of the IS/MND or warrant the preparation of an environmental impact report under sections 15073.5 and 15074.1 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS,the IS/MND concluded that,although the Project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the IS/MND identifies measures that will be incorporated into the Project,which will either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significant effects of the Project; and WHEREAS,on November 2,2023,the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the proposed entitlements and environmental effects of the Project and take public testimony, and City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™120 File #:23-956 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3a. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it,which includes without limitation,the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR;the South San Francisco Municipal Code;the Project applications;the Project Plans,as prepared by ELS Architecture,dated August 28,2023;the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,as prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants,dated September 8, 2023;all site plans,and all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed November 2,2023 meeting;and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e)and §21082.2),the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco,based on substantial evidence in the record, hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS General 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2.The exhibits and attachments,including the IS/MND and all appendices prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants (attached as Exhibit A),and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit B), are incorporated by reference as part of this Resolution, as if set forth fully herein. 3.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner. 4.The IS/MND reflects the Planning Commission’s independent judgement and analysis and,based on the whole record before it inclusive of the IS/MND and public comments received,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 2 DETERMINATION NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the findings contained in this Resolution and recommends that the City Council adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ND23-0005),in accordance with Section 21151 of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines section 15070 et seq.as the environmental document for the Project and conclude that no further environmental review is required. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™121 File #:23-956 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3a. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™122 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project, South San Francisco, California SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 (FINAL) PREPARED FOR City of South San Francisco PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants 123 124 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER PROJECT, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, California 94083 Attn: Phillip Vitale, Jr. Deputy Director of Capital Projects Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 60 Stone Pine Road, Suite 100 Half Moon Bay, California 94019 (650) 440-4160 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 78620 September 8, 2023 (FINAL) 125 126 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i CONTENTS 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Proposed Building Characteristics ............................................................................................ 4 2.2 Site Access, Parking, and Vehicle Circulation .......................................................................... 4 2.3 Recreation and Landscaping ..................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Utilities ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Construction .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.6 Required Discretionary Approvals ............................................................................................ 9 3 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Evaluation .............................................................. 10 I. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................ 11 II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources ........................................................................................ 15 III. Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 17 IV. Biological Resources ............................................................................................................... 23 V. Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 28 VI. Energy ..................................................................................................................................... 31 VII. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................... 32 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................................................... 36 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................... 39 X. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................. 46 XI. Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................ 52 XII. Mineral Resources ................................................................................................................... 53 XIII. Noise ........................................................................................................................................ 54 XIV. Public Services ........................................................................................................................ 60 XV. Recreation ................................................................................................................................ 62 XVI. Transportation ......................................................................................................................... 63 XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 66 XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................................. 69 XIX. Wildfire ................................................................................................................................... 74 XX. Mandatory Findings of Significance ....................................................................................... 76 4 References ........................................................................................................................................... 79 Appendices Appendix A. CalEEMod - SSF Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Detailed Report Appendix B. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Replacement Project Appendix C. Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Trip Generation and VMT Assessment, Kittleson & Associates, June 21, 2023 127 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii Figures Figure 1. Project location. ............................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Project vicinity and disturbance area. ............................................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Illustrative site plan. ...................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4. Landscaping plan with stormwater LID ........................................................................................ 7 Figure 5a. East side of existing Aquatic Center from parking lot. .............................................................. 12 Figure 5b. East entrance to existing Aquatic Center. .................................................................................. 12 Figure 5c. West side of existing Aquatic Center with playground. ............................................................ 12 Figure 5d. South side of existing Aquatic Center with soccer fields. ......................................................... 12 Figure 6. San Francisco International Airport, Airport Influence Areas. ................................................... 45 Tables Table 1. Project Consistency with General Plan Policies ........................................................................... 14 Table 2. Estimated Construction Schedule, Equipment and Vehicle Trips ................................................ 20 Table 3. Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions ................................. 21 Table 3. Noise Level Standards .................................................................................................................. 54 Table 4. Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ............................................................................ 56 Table 5. Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................. 65 Table 6. Water Supply and Demand Estimates for Normal Water Years In Acre Feet (DWR Table 7-2) ........................................................................................................................................... 72 Table 7. CalWater Water Supply and Demand Estimates for Multiple Dry Years (DWR Table 7-4) ....... 72 128 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 1 INTRODUCTION This section of the Initial Study provides a description of the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project (proposed project) and describes the location, surrounding land uses, existing conditions, and project components. 1.1 Project Location The City of South San Francisco (City) lies within San Mateo County in the San Francisco Bay Area. The City is located approximately 3 miles north of San Francisco International Airport and the City of San Bruno, just south of Daly City, Colma, and San Bruno Mountain, approximately 6 miles east of Pacifica, and west of the waters of San Francisco Bay. The 6.5-acre project site (APN 014-041-160) is located at 1 West Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California (Figure 1). The project site is located within the larger 26.9-acre Orange Memorial Park, the largest developed park within the City and managed by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department. The project site is bounded by Tennis Drive to the north, W. Orange Avenue to the east, and Orange Memorial Park to the south and west (see Figure 1; Figure 2). 1.2 Existing Conditions The Orange Memorial Pool Aquatic Center was constructed in 1970 and is the City’s only indoor municipal swimming pool. The existing 11,840-square foot, single-story, six-lane pool building is located within the northeast portion of Orange Memorial Park. In addition to the Orange Pool, the 26.9-acre Orange Memorial Park contains the 21,600-square-foot Joseph A. Fernekes Recreation Building, a community arts building, multiple soccer fields, five tennis courts, basketball courts, ball fields, bocce ball courts, a skate park, two playgrounds, and picnic areas. The primary parking lot for the Aquatic Center is located at the corner of Tennis Drive and W. Orange Avenue. This lot contains 22 vehicle parking spaces. A larger parking lot, which serves the Aquatic Center and various uses in Orange Memorial Park, is located northwest of the Aquatic Center, between Tennis Drive and Circle Court. This lot contains 144 vehicular spaces. In addition, an overflow parking lot with 55 vehicle parking spaces is located north of the Aquatic Center, across Tennis Drive. The City recently completed construction of the Orange Memorial Park Stormwater Capture Project in the southern portion of the park. With this project, runoff will be captured by an instream diversion and pre- treatment structure (trash screen and sediment removal chamber) at the upper end of the Colma Creek flood control channel within the park. Pretreated water will then enter a diversion pipe leading to an underground stormwater storage reservoir. A portion of the storage facility will function as a cistern, holding water for eventual non-potable irrigation use in the park and for water trucks, and the remainder will function as an infiltration chamber to recharge groundwater in the Westside Groundwater Basin. These storage facilities are being constructed underneath a portion of the existing baseball and softball fields, which will be reconstructed in place as part of the stormwater capture project. The ground surface across the park is relatively level, with elevations varying from about 25 to 29 feet above mean sea level.1 1 Ninyo & Moore, Geotechnical Evaluation, Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center, 1 West Orange Avenue, South San Francisco, California. 129 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 Figure 1. Project location. 130 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 Figure 2. Project vicinity and disturbance area. 131 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes demolition of the existing Orange Memorial Pool facility, the associated parking lot, and a portion of the existing recreational grass soccer field area and the construction of a new aquatic center. The new center would contain separate indoor and outdoor pools and amenity space, the relocated Eternal Flame sculpture into a new Veterans Memorial Plaza, a new parking lot with drop-off area, and associated walkways with new landscaping. 2.1 Proposed Building Characteristics The project would demolish the existing 22-space parking lot and a portion of existing grass soccer fields in the northeast portion of Orange Memorial Park along W. Orange Avenue and construct a new 23,070- square-foot aquatic center southeast of the existing Orange Memorial Pool. The facility would include a new building with an indoor pool and an attached outdoor pool. The single-story facility for the indoor pool would be approximately 30 feet in height and would contain an approximately 5,200-square foot, seven-lane indoor pool with a surrounding 2,920-square-foot pool deck. The pool would contain a volume of 173,264 gallons. Separate men’s, women’s, and family locker/changing rooms and restroom areas, staff changing and restroom areas, approximately 400 square feet of office space, a 800-square-foot activity room, and lobby, storage, and mechanical space would also be constructed within the new center. An approximately 6,287-square-foot, 10-lane outdoor pool with a volume of 283,956 gallons would be constructed adjacent to the center and to the south. The outdoor pool would have a surrounding 3,240- square-foot pool deck, pool storage, and bleachers and would be fenced by 15-foot-tall composite wood fencing (Figure 3). The proposed exterior materials for the aquatic center include painted cement plaster and composite wood cladding, with accent exterior glass detailing. The exterior materials palette primarily consists of a pre- finished “weathered steel” metal panel, composite wood cladding, and glazing. The proposed metal panel would be complementary to the color palette of the adjacent James A. Fernekes Building. In addition, the project would incorporate blue and aqua accent colors which are sprinkled throughout the building in the form of blue accent glazing, aqua colored cement plaster, and aqua colored signage. The exterior pool metal fencing would be painted dark bronze. 2.2 Site Access, Parking, and Vehicle Circulation The proposed project would construct the new aquatic center on the location of the existing 22-space parking lot. Once the new aquatic center is built, a new 13-space parking lot would be constructed in the location of the demolished pool, with access from Tennis Drive. Therefore, the project would shift the location of the existing Orange Pool parking lot and reduce the total vehicle parking spaces from 22 to 13 spaces for that primary lot. The 13 total spaces would include five Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)–accessible spaces, one ADA-accessible electric-vehicle (EV) space, and two EV spaces. Vehicle ingress and egress into the parking lot would be provided from one-way driveways off Tennis Drive. Implementation of the project would also include roadway and sidewalk frontage improvements along Tennis Drive and new traffic calming measures, including pedestrian crossing signs, speed humps and new striping, would be installed on either side of the mid-block crosswalk. Eight bicycle racks would be installed for visitor use, and one interior bicycle rack would be available for staff use. 132 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5 Figure 3. Illustrative site plan. 133 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 2.3 Recreation and Landscaping The project would remove a portion of the existing soccer field area, reducing the total area of grass field by about 7,200 square feet. The remaining grass field would be temporarily fenced off and used for construction staging and parking during project construction but would be returned to existing conditions and improved for recreational use post-project, including soccer practices and games. The project would remove approximately 34 existing trees on-site that are concentrated within the location of the new aquatic center. Approximately 35 replacement trees of a variety of species would be replanted throughout the site (Figure 4). The project would renovate and relocate the large Eternal Flame sculpture to a newly created Veterans Memorial Plaza adjacent to the pedestrian walkway from the new parking lot to the aquatic center. The plaza would also include seating, accent lighting, relocated Veterans Memorial plaques, and a flagpole. In addition to planting 35 trees, other landscaping elements would include low-water shrubs and grasses (including coffeeberry, manzanita, lavender, fescue, and deergrass). Replacement Canary Island date palms would be planted along Tennis Drive. Three planting areas would be added on-site for stormwater retention and treatment and planted with stormwater treatment grasses (California grey rush [Juncus patens] and Canyon prince wild rye [Leymus condensatus]) (see Figure 4). These areas would encompass approximately 1,855 square feet of Low Impact Development (LID) treatment areas. Stormwater would be routed through the LID stormwater treatment areas, and excess stormwater would be directed to the stormwater system in W. Orange Avenue. 2.4 Utilities The project would replace and add new wastewater, water, and stormwater drainage throughout the project site. A new 4-inch lateral and water meter connected to the water main on W. Orange Avenue would be installed for potable and irrigation water supply. A new 6-inch water line and hydrant connected to the main on W. Orange Avenue would run from W. Orange Avenue down Tennis Drive and be installed adjacent to Tennis Drive at the northwest corner of the pool building. A new 8-inch sanitary sewer would connect to the existing sanitary sewer line located at the southern end of the soccer fields, west of W. Orange Avenue. Four- to 16-inch stormwater drainage pipelines would be routed throughout the project site and overflow lines would connect to the stormwater pipeline within W. Orange Avenue. New electrical and communications lines would connect to existing vaults for the new building. Existing electrical and communications lines would remain until demolition of the old pool building. Existing gas line infrastructure would be removed. 134 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 7 Figure 4. Landscaping plan with stormwater LID 135 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 2.5 Construction Project construction is expected to begin in early 2024 and occur over a period of approximately 18 months. In addition to the area of project disturbance shown in Figure 2, the entirety of the recreational fields extending southwest from the disturbance area would be fenced off from park use and available for possible temporary construction parking and staging use. This staging area would extend to, but not include, W. Orange Avenue, Colma Creek, the basketball courts, Joseph A. Fernekes Building, and the adjacent playground. All or part of the construction staging area would be used to temporarily accommodate equipment and vehicle parking and materials storage. No ground disturbance would occur in the staging area. Before project completion, the grass and irrigation system would be repaired and replaced, and the recreational field returned to its existing condition. Construction activities would be phased as follows: 1. The site would be fenced, prepared and cleared in the vicinity of the easternmost parking lot and sports field area. The existing parking lot would be demolished and regraded. Trenching for new utilities would occur. Site grading activities would include raising the existing grade of the building footprint in areas within the designated floodplain to elevate the new structure out of the floodplain area. 2. The new aquatic center would be constructed, including utilities, sidewalks, and pathways necessary for access. The existing aquatic center would remain operational while the new facility is constructed. 3. Once the new pool building is operational, the existing pool building would be demolished and all old utility infrastructure removed. Demolition of the existing aquatic center would occur over a 3- month period. The site would be filled in and regraded for the new parking lot. 4. The new parking lot and Veterans Memorial plaza, with associated walkways, sidewalks, and lighting, would be constructed. The Eternal Flame sculpture would be relocated. Traffic calming measures on Tennis Drive would be installed, along with street and sidewalk improvements. 5. Construction activities would conclude with landscaping and final site work, including storm drainage, irrigation facilities, and rehabilitation of the staging area. Grading would include over-excavation of the pools and building foundations by approximately 2 to 3 feet, followed by laying rock and Geotech fabric for stability. Engineered fill, which could include up to 10 percent of native soils, would be added over the Geotech fabric and compacted prior to pouring concrete. Project construction would require approximately 9,700 cubic yards of soil to be removed from excavation for foundations, pools, and geotechnical improvements. The excavated soil would be analyzed, and if it is acceptable, approximately ten percent (970 CY) would be reused as fill and the remaining 8,730 CY would be hauled off. If the soil is not acceptable as engineered fill, then the entire 9,700 CY would be hauled off and approximately 970 CY would be imported for fill in addition to the importation of engineered fill. Fill would be required on-site to fill the existing pool excavation, level the surface and underly the parking lot, and to build up parts of the building footprint so the grade is above the flood zone where necessary. In addition to off hauling soils, demolition of the existing building and hardscape will generate approximately 800 cubic yards of debris which would be off-hauled for recycling or disposal. Thirty-four trees would also be removed and chipped. The estimated maximum depth of excavation is anticipated to be approximately 12 feet below ground surface for both the pools and new utilities. The project would reduce the pervious surface area from 56,925 square feet to 39,710 square feet and increase the impervious surface area by 17,215 square feet to 55,800 square feet. 136 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 9 Existing site materials would be recycled or reused following demolition, when feasible. Various recycled materials would be used in construction, and durable, long-lasting exterior finish materials would be incorporated throughout the project. Standard construction equipment, including excavators, graders, tractors, loaders, and pavers, would be used during project construction. No pile driving is proposed. Construction would take approximately 18 months to complete. Construction hours would be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Activities may occur between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays, but such activities would be limited to quiet activities and would not involve engine-driven machinery. Although the City allows construction from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays, weekend construction is not anticipated and would require permission from the City. Access for construction would be from a temporary access gate on W. Orange Avenue. Construction staging and materials staging would occur on-site, including the adjacent soccer fields. All work would comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Best Management Practices (BMPs) for stormwater management. Existing site materials would be recycled or reused following demolition, when feasible. Demolished asphalt and concrete would be taken to an asphalt recycling facility. 2.6 Required Discretionary Approvals This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) provides environmental information and analysis in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which is necessary for City decision makers to be able to adequately consider the effects of the project. The City, as the CEQA lead agency, has approval authority and responsibility for considering the environmental effects of the project as a whole. The City is responsible for authorizing and approving the project. The project is requesting approval of the following permits: • Design Review permit • Certification of CEQA document • City Building permit and Youth, Parks and Community Enrichment approval • Grading permit • Tree removal permit 137 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The proposed project could have a "Potentially Significant Impact" for environmental factors checked below. Please refer to the attached pages for discussion on mitigation measures or project revisions to either reduce these impacts to less than significant levels or require further study. ☐ Aesthetics ☐ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ☐ Public Services ☐ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ☐ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ☐ Recreation ☐ Air Quality ☐ Hydrology and Water Quality ☐ Transportation ☐ Biological Resources ☐ Land Use and Planning ☐ Tribal Cultural Resources ☐ Cultural Resources ☐ Mineral Resources ☐ Utilities and Service Systems ☐ Energy ☐ Noise ☐ Wildfire ☐ Geology and Soils ☐ Population and Housing ☐ Mandatory Findings of Significance ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ☐ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ☒ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ☐ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ☐ I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measure based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ☐ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Date: September 9, 2023 Signed: 138 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 11 I. Aesthetics Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☒ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant. A scenic vista generally provides focal views of objects, settings, or features of visual interest, or panoramic views of large geographic areas of scenic quality, from a fixed vantage point or linear corridor, such as a roadway or trail. A significant impact would occur if a project introduced incompatible scenic elements within a field of view containing a scenic vista or substantially block views of an existing scenic vista. The project site is located in the northwest portion of the existing Orange Memorial Park on Tennis Drive and W. Orange Avenue. It is surrounded by residential areas to the north and east, and park facilities to the west and south. The project site currently contains an aquatic center with swimming pool, parking areas, and soccer fields (see Figures 5a-5d). The existing aquatic center was built in 1970. There are no designated scenic vistas visible from the project site, and the surrounding vicinity does not contain any designated historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or scenic highways. The nearest designated scenic highway is Interstate Route 280, which is located approximately 1.3 miles west of the project site (Caltrans 2023). Sign Hill, approximately 0.57 mile northeast of the site, is one of the most prominent features visible from Orange Memorial Park. Sign Hill includes 65 acres of open space and almost 2 miles of hiking trails with views of the San Francisco Bay (South San Francisco Parks Division 2023a). The project site is visible from several viewing points on Sign Hill, as well as from neighborhoods on West W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive and surrounding public streets. The project site is also visible from areas in Orange Memorial Park, including the soccer fields, tennis courts, and playground, and is visible in the distance from the Centennial Way bicycle and pedestrian trail, which is approximately 1,000 feet to the southwest. 139 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 12 Figure 5a. East side of existing Aquatic Center from parking lot. Figure 5b. East entrance to existing Aquatic Center. Figure 5c. West side of existing Aquatic Center with playground. Figure 5d. South side of existing Aquatic Center with soccer fields. 140 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 13 The proposed project would replace an existing indoor pool and a portion of the grass recreation (soccer) fields with a new complex of two pools, one indoor and one outdoor, with ancillary facilities including changing rooms and restrooms. The project would also replace the existing parking lot with a new, smaller parking lot and would plant 35 trees surrounding the pool facilities and new parking area (Figures 5a-d). The new pool building would be approximately 30 feet in height. Due to the topography of the project site and relative lack of buildings on the site compared with the surrounding urban development, view changes would typically occur at limited vantage points, as opposed to along extensive roadway segments or from entire large geographic areas. Furthermore, the new pool building would be one story and approximately 30 feet in height and integrate with the surrounding urban development along Tennis Drive and W. Orange Avenue and the park setting of Orange Memorial Park. The project would remove approximately 34 existing trees and would replant approximately 35 trees throughout the project site. Thus, while the project would alter the existing visual character of the project site, it would replace the existing pool and parking lot with similar updated facilities including trees and landscaping, therefore the project would not adversely affect a scenic vista or obstruct views of visual resources and this impact would be less than significant. While the project site could be visible within panoramic views from Sign Hill, the project site contributes to the existing urban setting of the area and would not be especially discernible among the surrounding urban development. Therefore, implementation of the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista and impacts would be less than significant. Construction impacts would include excavation, grading, and ground disturbance; heavy equipment operation and staging areas for equipment parking and material storage; and additional truck traffic on haul routes. Construction would last approximately 18 months; therefore, short-term visual impacts due to construction would be temporary and less than significant. No mitigation is required. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The project site is not within a scenic highway corridor. The nearest designated scenic highway is Interstate Route 280, approximately 1.3 miles west of the project area. The project area does not have other scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or historic buildings (South San Francisco 2022a). Although the project would remove approximately 34 existing trees, it would replant approximately 35 trees surrounding the pool buildings and facilities. Therefore, the project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including those within a designated scenic highway. No impact would occur. c) In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than Significant. The project is located in an existing City park that has a zoning designation of Parks and Recreation (PR) and a General Plan Land Use designation of Parks and Recreation. The project would replace an existing public pool facility and a portion of existing soccer fields with a new public pool complex. Therefore, it would not conflict with applicable zoning. The existing building’s age and heavy use have resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior. Goal LU-10 of the 2040 General Plan identifies a goal of a high level of quality in the architecture and 141 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 site design of new construction. The exterior materials for the new aquatic center include pre-finished “weathered steel” metal pane, painted cement plaster and composite wood cladding, with accent exterior glass detailing. The exterior materials palette primarily consists of a pre-finished “weathered steel” metal panel, composite wood cladding, and glazing. The proposed metal panel would be complementary to the color palette of the adjacent Fernekes Building. In addition, the project would incorporate blue and aqua accent colors sprinkled throughout the building in the form of blue accent glazing, aqua colored cement plaster, and aqua colored signage. The South San Francisco 2040 General Plan does not include a visual element; however, there are visual and architectural guidelines under Chapter 5, Land Use and Community Design Element. Table 1 compares the project’s consistency with General Plan policies. Table 1. Project Consistency with General Plan Policies General Plan Policy Consistency Policy LU-8.4: Require street trees. Require new development to add street trees along streets and public spaces that provide shade, attractive landscaping, and contribute positively towards public health outcomes and climate mitigation and adaptation. Consistent. The project would plant 35 trees, including new street trees along W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive. Policy LU-8.8: Maintain and protect public views. Maintain and protect unique public views of the city, the bay, and local landmarks from major thoroughfares and hillside open spaces. Consistent. The project would not impact public views. New recreational facilities at Orange Memorial Park would integrate and harmonize with the surrounding urban development and would not be distinguishable from Sign Hill. Policy LU-9.2: Encourage architectural and visual interest in new development. Encourage distinctive architecture and elements that add visual interest to buildings to enhance people’s perceptions of South San Francisco as an interesting and inviting place. Consistent. The project would replace an aging pool facility with a new pool complex. The new pool complex would be constructed of metal panels, painted cement plaster, and composite wood cladding, in colors that complement the Fernekes Building, with exterior accents of aqua and blue in glazing, cement plaster and signage, and would be visually appealing. Policy LU-9.3: Require quality building materials. Require high- quality, long-lasting building materials on all new development projects in the city. Consistent. The project includes quality building materials, glazing, and infrastructure. Policy LU-9.4: Require walkable and inviting buildings and spaces. Require building design that creates walkable and inviting spaces, such as locating parking behind buildings, allowing for outdoor plazas and dining, and locating building frontages in close proximity to the sidewalk edge, where appropriate. Consistent. The new facilities would be integrated in the park design and easily accessible both from the park and from Tennis Drive. The project would reduce the overall number of parking spaces but would provide more ADA parking close to the building. As shown in Table 1, the project would be consistent with all General Plan policies related to visual and aesthetic impacts. Therefore, the project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality and this impact would be less than significant. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant. The project would include street and access lighting as required by the City, and would meet all requirements of the City Zoning Code and applicable building codes. As required by Section 20.3000.009 of the municipal code, all lighting fixtures would be fully shielded and located to avoid light spillover to adjacent properties. Further, light fixtures would not exceed 25 feet in height, and any light fixture located within 50 feet of a residence or public right-of-way would be further shielded to minimize light trespass onto adjacent properties. 142 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 Proposed window and selective door glazing would be tempered with a spectrally selective coasting to provide the highest visible transmittance, lowest shading coefficient, and high ultraviolet (UV) radiation blockage, therefore, the glass would not be highly reflective. Therefore, the project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area and this impact would be less than significant. II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project is located in the City of South San Francisco in Orange Memorial Park, an urban park, and surrounded by residential and commercial development. There is no agricultural or forest land in the vicinity of the project. Historically, the project vicinity supported several greenhouses used by the carnation-growing company Mazzanti Carnations, Inc., but operations ceased in 1996 when the land was purchased by the City for the expansion of park facilities (City of South San Francisco 2007; 2023a). The project site has a land use designation of Parks and Recreation in the City’s General Plan (City of South San Francisco 2022a). The areas surrounding Orange Memorial Park are designated as High, Medium, or 143 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 Low Density Residential; no parcels within the project vicinity are zoned for agricultural use (City of South San Francisco 2023b). No impacts to important farmland would occur. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The proposed project is located in a City park and is not under Williamson Act contract. The surrounding area is not zoned for agricultural use or under Williamson Act contract. The project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contracts and no impact would occur. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The proposed project is located in a City park and is not zoned for timberland or timberland production. There project vicinity is urban, and there are no areas zoned for timber or timber production in the City (City of South San Francisco 2023b, 2023c). No impact to timberland would occur. d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. There is no forest land in the vicinity of the project (City of South San Francisco 2023b, 2023c). No impact would occur. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project is located in a City park and the surrounding area includes urban uses. There is no farmland or forest land in the vicinity of the project. The project would not result in the conversion of farmland or forest land. No impact would occur. 144 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 17 III. Air Quality Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation The proposed project is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (Air Basin), which consists of the entirety of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties; the western portion of Solano County; and the southern portion of Sonoma County. The Air Basin is characterized by complex terrain consisting of coastal mountain ranges, inland valleys, and bays. The regional climate of the Air Basin is characterized by mildly dry summers and moderately wet winters. The region experiences moderate humidity with wind patterns consisting of mild onshore breezes during the day. The location of a strong subtropical high-pressure cell located in the Pacific Ocean induces foggy mornings and moderate temperatures during the summer, as well as occasional rainstorms during the winter. The air pollutants for which national and state standards have been promulgated and that are most relevant to air quality planning and regulation in the Bay Area include ozone, nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter, including dust, 10 microns or less in diameter (PM10) and 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter (PM2.5). In addition, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are of concern in the Bay Area. Each of these pollutants is briefly described below: • Ozone is a gas that is formed when reactive organic gases (ROG) and NOX—both byproducts of internal combustion engine exhaust—undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. Ozone concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light wind, and warm temperature conditions are conducive to its formation. Its effects can cause irritated respiratory system, reduced lung function, breathing pattern changes, reduced breathing capacity, inflamed and damaged cells that line the lungs, lungs to be more susceptible to infection, permanent lung damage, some immunological changes, increased mortality risk, and vegetation and property damage and aggravate asthma and other chronic lung diseases. • CO is a colorless, odorless gas produced by the incomplete combustion of fuels. CO concentrations tend to be the highest during winter mornings, with little to no wind, when surface-based inversions trap the pollutant at ground levels. Because CO is emitted directly from internal combustion engines—unlike ozone—and motor vehicles operating at slow speeds are the primary source of CO in the Bay Area, the highest ambient CO concentrations are generally found near congested transportation corridors and intersections. Potential health effects from CO range depending on exposure: slight headaches, nausea, aggravation of angina pectoris (chest 145 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 18 pain) and other aspects of coronary heart disease, decreased exercise tolerance in persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung disease, impairment of central nervous system functions, possible increased risk to fetuses, and death. • PM10 and PM2.5 consist of extremely small, suspended particles or droplets 10 microns and 2.5 microns or smaller in diameter, respectively. Some sources of particulate matter, like pollen and windstorms, are naturally occurring. However, in populated areas, most particulate matter is caused by road dust, diesel soot, combustion products, abrasion of tires and brakes, and construction activities. Health effects from short-term exposure (hours per days) can include the following: irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat; coughing; phlegm; chest tightness; shortness of breath; aggravation of existing lung disease, causing asthma attacks and acute bronchitis; and those affected with heart disease can suffer heart attacks and arrhythmias. Health effects from long-term exposure can include the following: reduced lung function, chronic bronchitis, changes in lung morphology, and death. • TACs refer to a diverse group of air pollutants that can affect human health but have not had ambient air quality standards established for them. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is a toxic air contaminant that is emitted from construction equipment and diesel-fueled vehicles and trucks. Some short-term (acute) effects of DPM exposure include eye, nose, throat, and lung irritation; coughs; headaches; light-headedness; and nausea. Studies have linked elevated particle levels in the air to increased hospital admissions, emergency room visits, asthma attacks, and premature deaths among those suffering from respiratory problems. Human studies on the carcinogenicity of DPM demonstrate an increased risk of lung cancer, although the increased risk cannot be clearly attributed to diesel exhaust exposure. Other pollutants that are regulated but not considered an issue in the project area are sulfur dioxide, vinyl chloride, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, and lead; the proposed project would not emit substantial quantities of those pollutants, so they are not discussed further in this section. Clean Air Plan Control Measures. The applicable air quality plan is the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) 2017 Clean Air Plan (Clean Air Plan), which was adopted on April 19, 2017. The Clean Air Plan defines control strategies to reduce emissions and ambient concentrations of air pollutants; safeguard public health by reducing exposure to air pollutants that pose the greatest health risk; and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to protect the climate. The control strategies of the Clean Air Plan include measures in the following categories: Stationary Source Measures, Transportation Measures, Energy Measures, Building Measures, Agriculture Measures, Natural and Working Lands Measures, Waste Management Measures, Water Measures, and Super‐Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Pollutants Measures. There are two categories of control measures that are applicable to the project – Transportation Control Measures and Waste Management Control Measures. The remainder do not apply to the project. The proposed project’s compliance with these control strategies is discussed under III (b) below. Transportation Control Measures. The BAAQMD identifies Transportation Measures as part of the Clean Air Plan to decrease emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and GHGs by reducing demand for motor vehicle travel, promoting efficient vehicles and transit service, decarbonizing transportation fuels, and electrifying motor vehicles and equipment. Waste Management Control Measures. The Waste Management Measures focus on reducing or capturing methane emissions from landfills and composting facilities, diverting organic materials away from landfills, and increasing waste diversion rates through efforts to reduce, reuse, and recycle. Construction and operation of the proposed project would be subject to applicable BAAQMD rules and requirements. The BAAQMD CEQA Thresholds and Guidelines were developed to assist local 146 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 19 jurisdictions and lead agencies in complying with the requirements of CEQA regarding potentially adverse impacts to air quality. The screening criteria established by the BAAQMD CEQA Thresholds and Guidelines dated April 2022 have been relied upon to make the following significance determinations. a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The 2017 Clean Air Plan is the current applicable regional Air Quality Plan (AQP) for the Air Basin (BAAQMD 2017). The primary goals of the 2017 Clean Air Plan are to protect public health and protect the climate, and the plan acknowledges that the BAAQMD’s two stated goals of protection are closely related. As such, the 2017 Clean Air Plan identifies a wide range of control measures intended to decrease both criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Because the proposed project does not involve population or employment growth, determining consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan involves assessing whether applicable control measures contained in the 2017 Clean Air Plan are implemented and whether implementation of the proposed project would disrupt or hinder implementation of AQP control measures. The control measures are organized into five categories: (1) stationary and area source control measures; (2) mobile source measures; (3) transportation control measures; (4) land use and local impact measures; and (5) energy and climate measures. The control measures are geared toward traditional land uses (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial uses) and buildings. All projects within BAAQMD’s jurisdiction are required to implement the BAAQMD BMPs during construction activities. As discussed in III (b), below, the proposed project would implement all required BMPs for construction activities and would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQP. Furthermore, the proposed project would not include any special features that would disrupt or hinder implementation of the AQP control measures. Therefore, the proposed project would not obstruct implementation of the 2017 Clean Air Plan and no impact would occur. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less than Significant. The BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance represent the allowable emissions a project can generate without generating a cumulatively considerable contribution to regional air quality impacts. Therefore, a project that would not exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance on a project level also would not be considered to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to these regional air quality impacts. The region is non-attainment for the federal and state ozone standards, state PM10 standards, and federal and state PM2.5 standards. Impacts related to construction and operation of the proposed project are addressed separately below. CONSTRUCTION Emissions from construction-related activities are generally short term in duration but may still cause adverse air quality impacts. The proposed project would generate emissions from construction equipment exhaust, worker travel, and fugitive dust. These construction emissions include criteria air pollutants and precursors from the operation of heavy construction equipment. As discussed below, the proposed project’s construction emissions would not exceed any significance threshold adopted for this project. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant contribution to cumulative impacts during construction. For all proposed projects, the BAAQMD recommends the implementation of BMPs, whether or not construction-related emissions exceed applicable thresholds of significance. As such, to ensure construction emission impacts are less than significant, the proposed project would apply the following BAAQMD BMPs during construction activities at the proposed project site: 147 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 • Exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, unpaved access roads) shall be watered with non-potable water two times per day. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. • All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks shall be paved as soon as possible. • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or by reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure in Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. • A publicly visible sign shall be posted with the telephone number and person to contact at the City regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours of a complaint or issue notification. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Construction emissions associated with the proposed project, including emissions associated with the operation of off-road equipment, haul-truck trips, on-road worker vehicle trips, vehicle travel on paved and unpaved surfaces, and fugitive dust from material handling activities, were calculated using the current California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2022.1. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with both construction and operation of a variety of land use projects. Emissions modeling included emissions generated during the following project phases: demolition (including demolition of the existing parking lot and pool building and removal of old utilities), site preparation (including grading and grubbing, and utility trenching), building construction (including construction of pool building, outdoor pool, parking lot, paths and sidewalks, street improvements), and architecture coating. Based on applicant-provided information, it is expected that construction activities associated with the proposed project would last 18 months. Table 2 shows the construction schedule, off-road construction equipment, worker and vendor trips, and on-site haul truck trips used to estimate emissions. Table 3 shows estimated air pollutant emissions. The exhaust emissions generated by construction equipment are based on the hours of operation, horsepower, and load factors of the equipment for which CalEEMod defaults were utilized. The detailed assumptions and calculations, as well as CalEEMod outputs, are provided in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report (SWCA 2023) prepared for the project, which is included in Appendix A. Table 2. Estimated Construction Schedule, Equipment and Vehicle Trips Phase Construction Schedule Construction Equipment Number of Workers Haul, Vendor & Onsite truck trips/day Demolition of Parking lot January 2024 20 work days Tractors/loaders/backhoes Rubber tired dozers Concrete/Industrial saws 30 11 148 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 21 Phase Construction Schedule Construction Equipment Number of Workers Haul, Vendor & Onsite truck trips/day Site preparation Jan-Feb 2024 23 work days Graders Rubber-tired dozers Tractors/loaders/backhoes 30 7 Grading March-April 2024 43 work days Graders Rubber-tired dozers Tractors/loaders/backhoes 30 7 Building Construction May 2024-Jan 2025 200 work days Cranes Forklifts Generators Tractors/loaders/backhoes Welders 30 9 Demolition of Center Feb-April 2025 64 work days Tractors/loaders/backhoes Rubber tired dozers Concrete/Industrial saws 30 23 Paving and Landscaping May-June 2025 40 work days Tractors/loaders/backhoes Pavers Paving equipment Rollers Cement and mortar mixers 20 3 Architectural coating June 2025 21 work days Air compressors 10 0 Source: CalEEMod version 2022.1.1.14 (see Appendix C); BAAQMD (2022) Table 3. Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5 SO2 Fugitive Dust Pounds per Day Construction Emissions (Unmitigated) 12.5 16.6 8.74 3.64 0.04 Construction Emissions (Mitigated) 12.5 16.6 4.37 1.45 0.04 BAAQMD Threshold 54 54 82 54 N/A BMPs Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2022.1.1.14 (see Appendix C); BAAQMD (2022) OPERATION Long-term air pollutant emissions from operation of the new pool complex would primarily be those associated with mobile sources s (e.g., vehicle trips), energy sources (e.g., electricity – the project would not include natural gas), and area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment) related to the proposed project. Vehicles traveling on paved roadways result in PM10 emissions from vehicle exhaust, tire and break wear, and dust thrown into the atmosphere. Energy source emissions from building mechanical systems such as pool filters and disinfection systems, lighting, heating and cooling, and plug-in electronics such as computers. Typically, area source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area source emissions associated with the project would include emissions from the use of landscaping equipment and the use of consumer products. 149 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 Transportation Control Measures. The proposed project would replace an existing parking lot and pool building in Orange Memorial Park with a new pool facility and parking lot. Although the proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of vehicle trips due to increased pool programs, it would result in a net decrease in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by expanding pool services and programs to serve South San Francisco residents so those residents would not have to travel to facilities in other cities (see Section 3.XVI, Transportation). The new pool facility would be located near residential areas and on a transit line, and would include bicycle parking facilities, which would help to reduce the demand for travel by single occupancy vehicles. Therefore, the project would promote BAAQMD initiatives to reduce vehicle trips and VMT and this impact would be consistent with the Transportation Control Measures. Waste Management Control Measures. The project would comply with local requirements for waste management (e.g., recycling and composting services). Therefore, the project would be consistent with the Waste Management Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan. The project would replace an aquatic center built in 1970. The project would remove existing natural gas infrastructure. The new facility would be all-electric, using no natural gas, which would reduce energy source emissions compared to the existing aquatic center. Although the project would increase pool capacity from one to two pools, and from six to 17 lanes, the new building and systems would be more energy efficient and would include rooftop solar panels to further defray energy source emissions. Electricity for South San Francisco is purchased from Peninsula Clean Energy, which purchases energy from renewable sources, minimizing energy source emissions (City of South San Francisco 2023d). The use of landscape maintenance equipment would not change appreciably over existing conditions. Architectural coatings would meet all applicable standards for air emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant contribution to cumulative air quality impacts during operation. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant. The BAAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be any facility or land use that includes members of the population who are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. The project is located in a public park surrounded by residential areas. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (BAAQMD 2022) recommends assessment of risks and hazards on sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of the project. Existing sensitive receptors within this radius include residences on Tennis Drive, Circle Court, Amberwood Court, Idlewood Drive, Idlewood Court, Mahogany Drive, Bay Court, Railroad Avenue, Commercial Avenue, 1st Lane, 2nd Lane, 3rd Lane, Baden Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue, W. Orange Avenue, Mayfair Avenue, Toyon Avenue, Mulberry Avenue, and Myrtle Avenue, as well as recreational users of Orange Memorial Park facilities including the Joseph A. Fernekes Building, playing fields, outdoor tennis courts, the skate park, and play structures. Short-term (18 months) construction activities could result in temporary increases in pollutant concentrations. The limited duration and limited quantities of construction emissions ensure that no individual receptor would be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations. During construction, the BAAQMD BMPs would minimize construction impacts by reducing dust and exhaust emissions. Therefore, construction of the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant. Operations of the pool complex as a result of the project would not change appreciably. As discussed above, the new pool complex would be more efficient in energy use, reducing operational emissions. Emissions from transportation would increase in the immediate vicinity due to an increase in the number of vehicle trips; however, it is likely that City residents are currently using pools in other jurisdictions that are further away. Expanding the Orange Pool facilities would provide additional classes and opportunities 150 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 23 for recreational swimmers closer to the city to better meet the demand from City residents. Therefore, the overall air emissions generated by traffic would decrease, as the project would cause a decrease in VMT by shortening vehicle trips for residents of South San Francisco. The project would also provide three EV charging stations in the new parking lot, promoting the use of electric vehicles. Therefore, construction and operation of the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant. The BAAQMD defines a significant impact related to odors as more than five confirmed odor complaints per year averaged over the past three years (BAAQMD 2022). The proposed project would include the use of pool chemicals; however, any localized odors associated with pool operation would be confined mainly to the project site and would readily dissipate. As such, operation of the proposed project is not expected to produce any offensive odors that would result in frequent odor complaints. During construction, a limited number of diesel engines would be operated on the project site for limited durations. Diesel exhaust and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from these diesel engines would be emitted during construction of the proposed project, which are objectionable to some; however, the duration of construction activities is expected to last approximately 18 months, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site, and diesel exhaust odors would be consistent with existing vehicle odors in the area. Considering this information, construction and operation of the proposed project would not create other emissions or odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people; impacts would be less than significant. IV. Biological Resources Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ 151 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site includes 6.5 acres of the northeastern portion of Orange Memorial Park and encompasses the existing Orange Pool, a parking lot, and some of the existing soccer fields (see Figure 2 in Chapter 1, Project Description). In addition, the project would include the use of additional soccer fields as a staging and parking area. Located in an urbanized area, the project site is surrounded by residential areas and City park facilities. Colma Creek, approximately 400 feet southwest of the project disturbance area, and approximately 40 feet southwest of the staging and parking area, is a perennial creek that flows to San Francisco Bay and consists of a vertical and trapezoidal-shaped concrete drainage with concrete channel walls and bed. The project topography is primarily level, with elevations from 24 to 29 feet above mean sea level. The current landscape is dominated by the existing aquatic center and associated parking lot, a large soccer field to the southwest, a playground to the east, and scattered ornamental trees throughout the site. The project does not include habitat for a candidate, sensitive or special-status species in local or regional plans, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish or Wildlife Service; therefore, the project would not have a substantial effect on sensitive species either directly through habitat modification, and no impact would occur. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project is located in a City park. Colma Creek nearest the project site is a concrete lined channel with no vegetation. According to the Environmental and Cultural Stewardship Element of the City’s 2040 General Plan, there is no riparian or other sensitive habitat identified on or in the vicinity of the project site (City of South San Francisco 2022a). Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service. No impact would occur. 152 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 25 c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project is located in a City park and there are no existing wetlands or waterbodies on the project site. The nearest water body is Colma Creek, approximately 400 feet to the southwest of the disturbance area, and 40 feet southwest of the temporary staging area. Colma Creek, in the vicinity of the project, has recently been modified for flood control management. The bottom and sides of the channel are lined with concrete. The City’s stormwater system discharges to Colma Creek and then to San Francisco Bay. Standard conditions of approval for all projects in the City include all stormwater quality BMPs required by the San Mateo Countywide Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) (see Section 3.X, Hydrology and Water Quality). All construction activities would be required to implement BMPs to comply with the SMCWPPP, which would prevent sediment-laden runoff and/or pollutants from leaving the site or impacting Colma Creek. Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would require management of exposed soils and vehicle fueling and maintenance, would further reduce these less-than-significant impacts. Excavation for the project would occur in the northeastern corner of Orange Memorial Park. Stormwater runoff from excavation and construction activities could impact water quality in Colma Creek if it were allowed to discharge to the stormwater system. Standard conditions of approval for all construction projects in the City include all stormwater quality BMPs required by the SMCWPPP (see Section 3.X, Hydrology and Water Quality). All construction activities would be required to implement BMPs to comply with the SMCWPPP, which would prevent sediment-laden runoff and/or pollutants from entering the stormwater system or Colma Creek. Implementation of BMPs required by the SMCWPPP would prevent contaminated stormwater runoff from discharging to Colma Creek. Therefore, impacts to state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.), including Colma Creek, through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means, would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would require management of exposed soils and vehicle fueling and maintenance, would further reduce these less-than-significant impacts. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: The following measures shall be implemented to minimize impacts to stormwater drainages and Colma Creek in the vicinity of the project: a. All spoils, such as dirt, excavated material, debris, and construction-related materials, generated during project activities shall be placed where they cannot enter any drainage ditch or culvert inlet. Spoils shall be covered or secured to prevent sediment from escaping. Once the spoil pile is no longer active, it shall be removed from the work area and disposed of lawfully at an appropriate facility. b. All exposed soils in the work area resulting from project activities shall be stabilized immediately following the completion of work to prevent erosion. Erosion and sediment control BMPs, such as silt fences, straw hay bales, gravel or rock-lined drainages, water check bars, and broadcast straw, can be used. BMPs shall be made of certified weed-free materials. Straw wattles, if used, shall be made of biodegradable fabric (e.g., burlap) and free of monofilament netting. At no time shall silt-laden runoff be allowed to enter any drainages or other sensitive areas. c. All fueling and maintenance of vehicles and other equipment and staging areas shall occur at least 100 feet from any drainages and other water features. Prior to the onset of work, the construction contractor shall prepare a plan to be approved by the City before construction begins to allow a prompt and effective response to any accidental spills. All workers shall be informed of the importance of preventing spills, and of the appropriate measures to take should a spill occur. 153 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 d. Before completion of the project, all exposed or disturbed surfaces shall be permanently protected from erosion with reseeding and landscaping. e. All exposed surfaces shall be wetted periodically to prevent significant dust. f. All stockpiled soil shall be covered during periods of rain. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less than Significant with Mitigation. Due to the fragmentation, development, and high level of disturbance and human activity in the project area, it is not anticipated that the project would adversely affect a wildlife movement corridor. The public park, with scattered trees and grass soccer fields, is unlikely to provide migration habitat for wildlife. The BMPs required under the SMCWPPP would protect the stormwater system and Colma Creek from project runoff. The surrounding area includes urban development and would not include any wildlife corridors. Operation of the project would not change from existing conditions. Therefore, the project is not expected to interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory wildlife. As a result, there would be no impacts to migration and wildlife corridors. The project site may contain suitable nesting and foraging habitat for avian species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3511 and 3513. Trees and shrubs on the project site may provide nesting habitat for migratory birds, but are unlikely to provide habitat for raptors due to the high public use rates of the park. The project has the potential to impact potential eggs or young of avian species covered under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. Potential nesting sites for migratory birds could be removed through removal of 34 trees on the project site; however, ornamental trees in the nearby surrounding park, and trees in residential neighborhoods could provide suitable nesting and foraging habitat and would remain undisturbed by project construction. If work occurs during bird nesting season, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, which requires nesting bird surveys and construction modifications if active nests are identified, would ensure that potentially significant impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure BIO-2: The following measures shall be implemented to minimize impacts to nesting birds, as required by the MBTA: a. If project activities, including, but not limited to, tree removal or pruning, grubbing and grading, are conducted during nesting bird season (February 15 to September 15), preconstruction nest surveys shall be conducted in and near the project (within 500 feet for large raptors and 300 feet for all other birds) by a qualified biologist within 7 days of the start of construction. If nesting birds are identified during the preconstruction survey, then the project shall be modified (i.e., a no-work exclusion buffer of appropriate size [to be determined by the qualified project biologist] shall be erected around active nests) and/or delayed as necessary to avoid impacts to the identified nests, eggs, and/or young. Disturbing active nests must be avoided until young birds have fledged. 154 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 27 e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less than Significant. The City’s 2040 General Plan’s Environmental and Cultural Stewardship Element includes policies to protect existing trees, expand the tree canopy cover, and enforce the Tree Preservation Ordinance (City of South San Francisco 2023e). Under the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance, protected trees may not be removed or pruned back by more than a third without a permit. Protected trees include the following: • Any tree of the following species with a circumference of 75 inches or more when measured 54 inches above natural grade o Blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) o Black acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) o Myoporum (Myoporum laetum) o Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) o Glossy privet (Lingustrum lucidum) o Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra) • Any heritage tree of the following species with a circumference of 30 inches or more when measured at 54 inches above natural grade o California bay (Umbellaria californica) o Oak (Quercus spp.) o Cedar (Cedrus spp.) o California buckeye (Aesculus californica) o Catalina ironwood (Lyonothamnus floribundus var. asplenifolius) o Strawberry tree (Arbutus spp.) o Mayten (Maytenus boaria) o Little Gem dwarf southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem') • Any tree other than the species listed above with a circumference of 48 inches or more when measured 54 inches above natural grade • A tree or stand of trees so designated based upon findings that it is unique and of importance to the public due to its unusual appearance, location, or historical significance • A stand of trees whereby each tree is dependent upon the others for survival (City of South San Francisco 2023e) The project would remove 34 existing trees, none of which are heritage trees (Rizzoli 2023). Further, the project would plant 35 new trees to expand the City’s tree canopy cover in compliance with the Environmental and Cultural Stewardship Element of the City’s 2040 General Plan. New trees would include evergreen canopy trees such as Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), California pepper (Schinus molle), and stone pine (Pinus pinea), as well as deciduous canopy trees such as London plane tree (Platanus acerfolia ‘Columbia’), and, along Tennis Avenue, Canary Island date (Phoenix canariensis). Since the project would not remove any heritage trees and would replace the tree canopy by planting 35 trees, no impacts to heritage trees would occur. Policy CP-7.2 in the 2040 General Plan prioritizes expansion of the canopy cover to increase environmental benefits; including sequestering carbon dioxide, mitigating the urban heat island, improving air quality, providing traffic calming, and reducing energy use. The project would remove 34 155 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 trees and replace them with 35 new trees. Therefore, although the project would remove trees, it would over time replace the lost canopy cover as the new trees mature. The project would not remove or prune any heritage trees and would replace removed trees, therefore, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as general plan policies, tree preservation policy or ordinance, therefore the impact would be less than significant. f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. There are no Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, that apply to the project. Therefore, no impact would occur. V. Cultural Resources Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ Environmental Evaluation The analysis is based on a cultural resources investigation and technical report prepared by SWCA architectural historians and archaeologists that meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOI’s) Professional Qualification Standards (Appendix B). The cultural resources inventory included a California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) Northwest Information Center (NWIC) records search, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) database, a buried site sensitivity analysis, a review of historic aerials and relevant literature, and an intensive pedestrian survey for archaeological and historical resources. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5? No Impact. The investigation for the Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum identified one previously recorded historical resource on the project site. In addition, SWCA performed a field visit, walked the project area, and documented the architectural features of the existing pool building. The railroad tracks on Railroad Avenue that were a part of the Southern Pacific Junction known as CA-SMH-357 (P-41-000497) have been previously removed. The section of Railroad Avenue from Memorial Park to Spruce Avenue has been completely removed. Beyond Spruce Avenue, the rail bed continues without tracks, paralleling Railroad Avenue. This alignment has been completely redeveloped 156 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 29 in some sections, with ties, rails, and other components of the former structure removed in others. The former resource does not retain sufficient integrity to convey significance. No other cultural resources—archaeological or historical—are known to exist within the project area or its vicinity. The project area is mostly covered in turf grasses with concrete, asphalt, trees, and shrubs. Orange Pool, located at Orange Memorial Park in central South San Francisco, was constructed in 1970 and is a Mid- Century Modern natatorium (indoor swimming pool). The current pool building is surrounded by mature vegetation. Palm trees that line Tennis Avenue have a placard stating that they were planted in 1946, and a war memorial is located at the entrance to the pool building. The Orange Pool building was documented and evaluated for potential eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and designation as a South San Francisco Historical Resource. Both assessments found no historic resources within the project area and that the Orange Pool building does not demonstrate historical significance such that it would qualify for listing or designation under either program. As such, Orange Pool does not appear to qualify as a historical resource. The project would refurbish and move the existing Eternal Flame sculpture to a new plaza area in the project area. Since the Eternal Flame sculpture was relocated from City Hall to the Park in the past, and would be relocated again as part of the project, the project would not affect the historical status of the sculpture. Therefore, the project, which includes the demolition of the current Orange Pool building and the construction of the new aquatic center, would have no impact on historical resources. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Less than Significant with Mitigation. No archaeological resources, artifacts, or features were observed within the project area. As discussed above, the former railroad tracks on Railroad Avenue that were a part of the Southern Pacific Junction have been previously removed. The disturbed nature of the site through its grading and various periods of development and improvements as a municipal park suggests that the overall archaeological sensitivity for the project area is low. Despite this low overall sensitivity, it is possible that unknown archaeological resources are extant within the project area. Such resources have the potential to be impacted during the construction of the project, particularly during ground-disturbing activities. However, any project impacts to unknown archaeological resources can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level by following the Inadvertent Discovery procedures noted below in Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Mitigation Measure CUL-1: The following measures shall be implemented in the event that unanticipated cultural resources are exposed during project construction: a. In the event that unanticipated cultural resources are exposed during disturbance activities, work within 15 meters (50 feet) of the find must stop and an SOI-qualified archaeologist (SWCA Senior Project Manager Christina Alonso [925-399-9220]) must be notified immediately. Work may not resume until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Disturbance activities may continue in other areas. If the discovery proves significant, additional work such as archaeological testing, data recovery, or consultation with stakeholders may be warranted. 157 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Less than Significant with Mitigation. Although, according to the representative of the Amah Mutsun Band of Mission San Juan Bautista, railroads were historically built on Native burial grounds, there are no known cemeteries or burial sites in the project area. There is a low potential to encounter intact buried human remains within the project area. Despite this low overall sensitivity, it is possible that unanticipated human remains are extant within the project area, which have the potential to be impacted during the construction of the project, particularly during ground-disturbing activities. However, any project impacts to unknown human remains can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level by following the Discovery of Human Remains procedures noted below in Mitigation Measure CUL-2. Mitigation Measure CUL-2: The following measures shall be implemented in the event that human remains are exposed during project construction: The discovery of human remains during the course of the project is a possibility. If human remains are encountered, then the procedures outlined by the NAHC, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and PRC Section 5097.98, would be followed. If the monitor determines that a discovery includes human remains: a. All ground-disturbing work within the immediate vicinity (25 feet) of the find would halt. b. The archaeologist would contact the San Mateo County Coroner: San Mateo County Coroner 50 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402 Phone: (650) 312-5562 Web: https://www.smcgov.org/coroner c. As a courtesy, the County Coroner would also notify the NAHC: Native American Heritage Commission 915 Capitol Mall, Room 364 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: nahc@nahc.ca.gov The County Coroner would have 2 working days to examine the remains after being notified in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the San Mateo County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American and are not subject to the County Coroner’s authority, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the NAHC of the discovery. d. The NAHC would immediately designate and notify the Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD), who will have 48 hours after being granted access to the location of the remains to inspect them and provide recommendations for the treatment of them. 158 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 31 VI. Energy Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? The City of South San Francisco adopted their Climate Action Plan (CAP) in 2022 (City of South San Francisco 2022b). The CAP identifies strategies and actions to reduce GHG emissions and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. Through the CAP, the City implements GHG reduction measures at both City-owned facilities and at private developments, including, but not limited to, energy-efficient new construction, all- electric construction of new buildings, the installation of solar facilities at City buildings; implementing landscape water requirements; requiring high efficiency water fixtures; increasing tree canopy; implementing a Travel Demand Management (TDM) program; and requiring electrical car charging stations at City facilities. Less than Significant. The proposed project would involve the demolition of a 50-year-old aquatic center, construction of a new aquatic center with two pools, mechanical equipment and infrastructure, and various landscaping and hardscape. During construction, energy consumption would be associated with primarily diesel and gasoline fuel consumption for the operation of construction equipment and for worker and haul trips. During operations, energy consumption would be limited to electricity needed for standard building and pool operations such as lighting, heating/cooling, and mechanical equipment, as well as outdoor exterior and landscape lighting. No natural gas is planned for consumption. The consumption of energy resources during construction would be temporary and the installation of a new and energy-efficient building and equipment is anticipated to function more effectively than the existing aquatic center. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in potentially short- or long-term significant impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Instead, the proposed project would improve energy efficiency for the City’s aquatic center. While construction activities would involve diesel and gasoline fuel use for equipment and haul and commuter trips, overall consumption would be minimal and temporary, lasting approximately 18 months. For these reasons, the project’s energy use would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less than Significant. The proposed Orange Pool Aquatic Center is considered a new development. The City’s CAP has goals for new development that include providing on-site solar and batteries when feasible; constructing all-electric buildings; exceeding mandatory energy efficiency requirements by 20 159 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 percent or more; providing EV charging stations at municipal facilities; enhancing bicycle, transit and pedestrian connectivity; implementing mandatory organics and food waste diversion; using water efficient landscaping and high-efficiency water fixtures; expanding tree canopy cover; requiring all new municipal buildings and facilities to meet minimum LEED silver standards; and requiring municipal projects to achieve 75 percent waste diversion from landfill. The proposed project is consistent with the City’s CAP. The new pool facilities would meet or exceed energy efficiency requirements, are all-electric, include solar panels, and may include batteries if determined to be feasible. The project includes three EV charging stations in the new parking lot, 9 bicycle racks, water efficient landscaping and high-efficiency water fixtures. Proposed building materials and mechanical equipment would include energy-efficient glazing, insulation, and energy efficient models. At least 75 percent of asphalt or concrete removed during construction would be recycled. The project would also be consistent with all state plans for energy efficiency, including the 2017 California Air Resources Board Climate Change Scoping Plan, State of California Energy Plan, California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program, Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015, State Alternative Fuels Plan, California Green Building Standards Code—Part 11, Title 24, and California Code of Regulations (CALGreen), the first-in-the-nation mandatory green building standards code. For these reasons, the project would not conflict with a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts on energy would be less than significant. VII. Geology and Soils Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (iv) Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 160 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 33 Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: The analysis in this section is based on the Geotechnical Evaluation – Revision 1 for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center, December 6, 2022, by Ninyo and Moore. The geologic study includes seismic hazards (liquefaction, lateral spreading, subsidence), compressible soils, expansive soils, and corrosive soils. a-i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less than Significant. The project site is located approximately 2 miles northeast of the San Andreas Fault Zone and is not located in a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey 2021). Therefore, while the project site is in a known seismic area and would likely be subject to earthquakes, the likelihood of surface faulting or ground rupture is considered low, and it would not be likely to be subject to surface rupture from a known earthquake fault. Therefore, potential impacts related to surface rupture from earthquake activity are less than significant. a-ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant. The project site is located approximately 2 miles northeast of the San Andreas Fault Zone and 16.3 miles southwest of the Hayward Fault Zone, in one of the most seismically active regions in the state. The San Andreas Fault has produced earthquakes of an estimated magnitude between 7.7 and 8.3 in 1906 (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2023), and 6.9 in 1989 (USGS 2019). The 1908 quake produced shaking on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of between VII and IX which was strong enough to cause significant damage to structures around the peninsula (USGS 2023). The design and construction of the project is required to comply with the building codes related to seismic risk such as the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and South San Francisco Municipal Code, which incorporates the International Building Code. The City would be required to submit a soils report in order to obtain a building permit from the City Economic and Community Development Department, Building Division, which would ensure that project plans and specifications comply with the CBC and local amendments to the code, where applicable (City of SSF 2018). Among many seismic requirements, the CBC requires foundations and structures to be designed and constructed to withstand the ground motions (i.e., peak ground accelerations [g]) that have a 10 percent chance of being exceeded in 50 years 161 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 (equivalent to a 1/475 annual chance of being exceeded). Therefore, compliance with CBC requirements would result in a less-than-significant impacts due to strong seismic ground shaking. a-iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project site is in a liquefaction hazard zone identified by the State Geologist (California Geological Survey 2021). The geotechnical study analyzed the potential for liquefaction from a magnitude 7.81 earthquake producing a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.99 gravity (g). Peak ground acceleration is a measure of how hard the ground shakes at a given point. A PGA of 0.99g is correlated to an intensity of IX on the Modified Mercalli Scale, which would produce violent perceived ground shaking and heavy damage to man-made structures. The study assumed a groundwater depth of 12 to 13 feet. The results indicate that soil at depths ranging from about 10 to 23 feet, and from about 25 to 34 feet below ground surface may liquefy, potentially causing settlement, sand boils (where liquefied soils from below are ejected up through the ground surface), and ground subsidence. The study identified the potential for liquefaction of up to 5 inches in the liquefaction zone, and an additional 3 to 5 inches of settlement in the dry zone above the liquefaction zone. Since the site is located within a liquefaction-susceptible zone, and based on the results of the geotechnical evaluation, the project would have the potential for ground shaking, liquefaction-induced ground settlement, and sand-boil-induced ground subsidence. Therefore, impacts related to ground failure would be potentially significant. Implementation of the engineering recommendations provided in the geotechnical report, and proposed Mitigation Measure GEO-1, would minimize risks to life and property from seismic-related hazards. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measure GEO-1: All earthwork and construction activities shall be monitored by a licensed engineer or professional geologist. The purpose of the monitoring is to assess soil conditions and confirm the appropriate engineered support systems are incorporated into the project design and installed correctly. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, in addition to the requirements of the geotechnical report, would reduce impacts related to seismic hazards to less than significant. a-iv) Landslides? No Impact. The project site is relatively flat, with elevations varying from 25 to 29 feet above mean sea level. It is not located in an identified landslide hazard zone. Therefore, the project would not result in impacts related to landslide hazard and no impact would occur. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant. A significant impact would occur if a project would expose large areas to the erosional effects of wind and water for a protracted period of time, resulting in substantial erosion and/or the loss of topsoil. The majority of the ground surface on the north side of the park consists of 1 to 4 feet of imported fill material on top of native soil. Much of it is paved over. The project site has a low- to-moderate erosion risk. Since the majority of the project work area is previously disturbed and essentially flat, clearing, excavation, and grading activities at the project site are unlikely to result in 162 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 35 significant short-term erosion impacts. In addition, project construction would comply with the SMCWPPP, which would include BMPs to prevent stormwater erosion from leaving the site. The project would also comply with the BAAQMD fugitive dust requirements, which would prevent dust from wind erosion from leaving the site. The project would require excavation for the new swimming pools, buildings, and parking area. The project would require a total of approximately 9,700 cubic yards (CY) of cut, approximately 970 CY of which may be used as fill. A maximum of approximately 9,700 cubic yards of soil and 800 cubic yards of debris from demolition of the existing pool and hardscape would be hauled off-site for disposal. Engineered fill would be imported to the site. As required by the San Francisco RWQCB and the SMCWPPP, the project would implement BMPs to reduce erosion during construction. Since the total area of disturbance is more than 1 acre (approximately 6.5 acres), the City would be required to implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), according to the requirements of the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and the SMCWPPP. The plan would include BMPs to control erosion and sedimentation impacts and stabilize disturbed bare earth areas. Any bare earth areas would be reseeded prior to the end of construction. Section 3.X, Hydrology and Water Quality, provides additional information about the SWPPP and Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit requirements and related permits. The addition of approximately 17,215 square feet (approximately 0.4 acre) of impervious surface area for the aquatic center, parking lot, and walkways could increase the stormwater runoff volume and rate compared with existing conditions, which could in turn accelerate soil erosion and loss of topsoil if stormwater were conveyed directly into Colma Creek. However, as discussed in Section 3.X(a), the project is a C.3 regulated project and includes LID stormwater measures that meet City requirements to contain and treat stormwater flow. Stormwater from the project site would flow overland to treatment and containment areas on the project site. Overflow would discharge to a storm drain on W. Orange Avenue, which would eventually discharge to Colma Creek. Stormwater runoff would be directed into new vegetated channels, which would provide biotreatment of stormwater before it enters the storm drain and Colma Creek; this biotreatment meets the requirements of the C.3 program. All disturbed areas would be reseeded and/or landscaped prior to the end of construction. The new drainage and treatment system would be adequate to handle the additional volume of stormwater from 0.4 acre of impervious surface area. Therefore, impacts resulting from water-related erosion would be less than significant. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project site has a high potential for liquefaction. As discussed above, the City has completed a geotechnical report and would be required to submit a soils report that complies with the CBC. As stated above, 2022 CBC and standard geotechnical engineering practice requires identification of seismic design parameters to inform all earthwork requirements, foundation designs, and concrete/building material specifications. Design and construction of the project in accordance with the CBC and the recommendations in the geotechnical report, along with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, would be sufficient to ensure public exposure to risks related to seismic-induced ground failure would remain minimal. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 163 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? No Impact. The geotechnical report determined that the expansion index of the soils on the project site had very low expansion potential, and the subsurface borings showed granular soils with little expansion potential. There are no substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property as the expansion index of the soils on the project site had very low expansion potential. Therefore, the risk related to expansive soils is relatively low and this impact would be less than significant. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The project would not include septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No impact would occur. f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than Significant with Mitigation. While the majority of the project site has been previously disturbed as a developed recreational park, ground disturbance and excavation for the pools and within the project area would occur during construction. Excavation in these areas could potentially uncover unique paleontological resources or geologic features. Based on the results of borings for the adjacent Stormwater Capture Project, located approximately 120 feet southwest of the project, the likelihood of encountering unique paleontological resources or geologic features is low; however, the potential for uncovering such resources during excavation remains. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that if historic or cultural resources are encountered during site grading or excavation activities, all work shall be halted within 100 feet of the discovery area and the contractor shall notify the City. The implementation of this measure also applies to paleontological resources and geologic features, thereby minimizing potential impacts to such resources. Therefore, impacts to unique paleontological resources or unique geologic features would be less than significant with mitigation. VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation Global climate change can be measured by changes in wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. Scientific consensus has identified human-related emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) 164 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 37 above natural levels is a significant contributor to global climate change. GHGs are substances that trap heat in the atmosphere and regulate the Earth’s temperature, and include water vapor, CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ground level ozone, and fluorinated gases, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), and halons. The potential impacts of climate change include severe weather patterns, flooding, reduced quality and availability of water, sea level rise, and beach erosion. Primary activities associated with GHG emissions include transportation, utilities (e.g., power generation and transport), industry, manufacturing, agriculture, and residential. End-use sector sources of GHG emissions in California are as follows: transportation (41 percent); industry (23 percent); electricity generation (16 percent); agriculture and forestry (8 percent); residential (7 percent); and commercial (5 percent) (CARB 2018). Assembly Bill (AB) 32 is a California State Law that establishes a comprehensive program to reduce GHG emissions from all sources throughout the state. AB 32 requires CARB to develop regulations and market mechanisms to reduce California’s GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, representing a 25 percent reduction statewide, with mandatory caps beginning in 2012 for significant emissions sources. GHG emissions contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, an individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development in the City of South San Francisco are primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity and natural gas), water usage, wastewater generation, and the generation of solid waste. GHG Emissions Threshold At the regional level, the BAAQMD has proposed the following thresholds of significance for operational-related GHG emissions as of May 2017: • For land use development projects, the threshold is compliance with a qualified GHG Reduction Strategy; or annual emissions less than 1,100 metric tons per year (MT/year) of CO2e; or 4.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (residents + employees). Land use development projects include residential, commercial, industrial, and public land uses and facilities. • For stationary-source projects, the threshold is 10,000 metric tons per year (MT/year) of CO2e. Stationary-source projects include land uses that would accommodate processes and equipment that emit GHG emissions and would require an Air District permit to operate. If annual emissions of operational-related GHGs exceed these levels, the proposed project would result in a cumulatively significant impact. The BAAQMD has not yet adopted a threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions. However, Section 8.2 of the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommends that the Lead Agency quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction and make a determination of the significance of the construction-related GHG impacts in relation to meeting Assembly Bill 32 GHG reduction goals. The Lead Agency is also encouraged to incorporate BMPs to reduce GHG emissions during construction as applicable. BMPs include but are not limited to: using alternative fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles/equipment of at least 15 percent of the fleet; using local building materials of at least 10 percent; and recycling or reusing at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials (BAAQMD 2017b). 165 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 The City of South San Francisco adopted a CAP in 2022 that identifies strategies and actions to reduce GHG emissions. The City has and continues to implement GHG reduction measures associated with both City-owned facilities and private development. These GHG reduction measures include, but are not limited to: the installation of solar facilities at City buildings; adopting and enforcing a construction and demolition waste recycling ordinance; adopting and implementing a TDM program; and providing electrical car charging stations at City facilities. a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant. The primary source of proposed Project construction GHG emissions would be from mobile sources such as worker trips and from haul trips during excavation. Neither the City of South San Francisco nor the BAAQMD has adopted a threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions. However, the Lead Agency should quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction, and make a determination on the significance of these construction-generated GHG emission impacts in relation to meeting AB 32 GHG reduction goals, as required by the Public Resources Code, Section 21082.2. Project operational GHG emissions would be limited to the long-term operation of a new Aquatic Center, including heating, cooling, general lighting and operational uses. The BAAQMD operational, long-term GHG emission thresholds of significance for stationary source projects is more than 10,000 metric tons per year carbon dioxide equivalent units (MTCO2e/year). If a project generates GHG emissions above the threshold level, the project would be considered to generate significant GHG emissions and conflict with applicable GHG regulations. Given that the proposed Project operations would be limited to the electrical operation associated with the new Aquatic Center, annual operation GHG emissions are calculated to be 228 MTCO2e/year, well below the 10,000 MTCO2e/year threshold of significance. Annual short-term construction GHG emissions would be 321 MTCO2e/year and would not significantly contribute to climate change. For these reasons, the proposed project’s GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant. The BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan outlines the goals and objectives to reduce Bay Area GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, consistent with the GHG reduction targets adopted by the state of California. The 2017 Clean Air Plan includes the following measures to reduce emissions from construction and farming equipment: • Use various strategies to reduce emissions from construction and farming equipment (e.g., incentives for equipment upgrades and/ or encourage the use of renewable electricity and fuels). • Provide incentives for the early deployment of electric, Tier 3 and 4 off-road engines used in construction, freight and farming equipment. • Support field demonstrations of advanced technology for off-road engines and hybrid drive trains. • Work with CARB, the California Energy Commission (CEC), and others to develop more fuel- efficient off-road engines and drive-trains; and • Work with local communities, contractors, farmers, and developers to encourage the use of renewable electricity and renewable fuels, such as biodiesel from local crops and waste fats and oils, in applicable equipment. CARB’s AB 32 Scoping Plan (2008) has several measures to reduce emissions from transportation fuels, which would indirectly reduce emissions from construction equipment. These include the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), which would reduce GHG emissions by minimizing the full fuel-cycle carbon 166 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 39 intensity of transportation fuels used in California. The 2017 Scoping Plan Update, which builds upon the initial Scoping Plan, contains new strategies and recommendations to reduce GHG to reach the State’s 2030 GHG emissions reduction target (CARB 2017). California’s overall plan for climate adaptation is also summarized in Safeguarding California Plan: 2018 Update. This plan provides policy guidance associated with climate risks in nine sectors in California and provides realistic sector-specific recommendations (CNRA 2018). The various plans, policies, and regulations at the state and local level do not directly require the reduction of GHG emissions from construction equipment; however, emissions would be indirectly reduced through programs like the LCFS. Several rules adopted to reduce emissions of non-GHGs, such as CARB’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation (13 CCR 2449), could also reduce GHG emissions. Since the construction equipment would operate in compliance with all applicable regulations for off-road equipment, the proposed project would not conflict with any plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Proposed mechanical equipment needed for standard building and pool operations, as well as energy efficiency for lighting and heating/cooling, would include energy efficient models. No natural gas is planned for operations. For these reasons, the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions and impacts would be less than significant. IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 167 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project would involve the use or disposal of hazardous materials as part of its routine operations or would have the potential to generate toxic or otherwise hazardous emissions that could adversely affect sensitive receptors. Construction of the project would involve the transport, use, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials. These materials include paints, adhesives, surface coatings, cleaning agents, fuels, and oils that are typically associated with development of any construction project. As described in Chapter 1, Project Description, construction activities would be temporary, lasting approximately 18 months. These temporary construction activities involving the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials would be conducted in compliance with all health and safety requirements, such as County and City General Plan policies, CCR Sections 337 through 340, Chapter 6.95 of California Health and Safety Code Article 1, and CCR Title 19, Public Safety, Division 2 (if required). Because the City and contractor would comply with applicable regulations and laws pertaining to the transport, storage, use, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, the exposure of the public, construction workers, and environment to hazardous materials would be less than significant. Operation of the pool would include an automatic system using chlorine products (calcium chloride, calcium hypochlorite, muriatic acid, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hypochlorite, sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate) in liquid form for disinfection in both the indoor and outdoor pools. The indoor pool would also use UV radiation as a secondary process to control the formation of undesirable chlorine byproducts. A computerized system would monitor chlorine levels in both pools to ensure the proper levels of chlorine and increased water quality (City of South San Francisco 2023c). Chemicals would be held in closed tanks with secondary containment, and refillable by container truck. Chlorine storage and delivery systems would meet standard engineering requirements for safety and are considered low hazard. The project site and vicinity include an urban park and urban residential areas. The area historically supported flower nurseries, including the Mantegani site and Mazzanti Carnation, Inc. The Mantegani site, approximately 300 feet north of the project site, was an ornamental flower nursery from 1931 to 1987 specializing in snapdragons and carnations. The site underwent a cleanup for pesticide contaminants (primarily dieldrin and DDT) that was certified as complete as of February 20, 2007 (California Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC] 2023b). Mazzanti Carnations, Inc., approximately 800 feet west of the project site, operated greenhouses until the early 1990s. The site underwent a cleanup for pesticide contaminants (insecticides, fumigants, and herbicides) that was certified as complete as of August 26, 2016 (State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB] 2023b). Soil and water testing was completed by Fugro Consultants, Inc. in 2016 for Orange Memorial Park’s Stormwater Capture Project, approximately 480 feet southwest of the project. Testing revealed relatively low levels of organochlorine pesticides at soil depths of between 2 and 3.5 feet below ground surface. Fugro Consultants, Inc. also identified that arsenic was the only material present in amounts exceeding an Environmental Screening Level (ESL).2 Arsenic was detected at levels between 1.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 3.0 mg/kg, which exceeds the commercial shallow soil exposure ESL of 0.31 mg/kg and the Any Land Use/Any Soil Depth Exposure for a Construction Worker ESL of 0.94 2 ESLs are developed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. They are intended to help identify potential environmental concerns at contaminated sites but are not intended to establish policy or regulation (SWRCB 2020). 168 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 41 mg/kg. The amount of arsenic present is common as background levels in Bay Area soils and is not likely to be from greenhouse use. All construction activities would be required to comply with applicable policies, standards, and regulations to ensure there are no hazards related to the routine use, disposal, transport, or accidental release of hazardous materials (California Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] requirements, Title 8 and 22 of the Code of California Regulations). All excavated fill and native soil material would be disposed in accordance with applicable codes and regulations and the transport and disposal of these materials is not expected to create a significant hazard to construction workers or the nearby community. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and this impact would be less than significant. Implementation of mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would further reduce this less than significant impact. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project could create an upset or accident condition involving hazardous materials. The project is not located on a hazardous contamination site, and thus there is no reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials from existing hazardous contamination.27F Construction of the project would use small amounts of hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel. The BMPs implemented for the SMCWPPP (discussed further in Section 3.X, Hydrology and Water Quality) would contain minor spills during construction. Operation of the pool complex and use of pool chemicals would not change appreciably because of the project. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, and the impact would be less than significant. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant. A project-related significant adverse effect may occur if a project site is within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school site, and the project is projected to release hazardous emissions that would exceed regulatory thresholds and would pose a health hazard. The closest school is Los Cerritos Elementary School, located approximately 0.23 mile southwest of the project. Other schools in the vicinity include South San Francisco High School and Parkway Heights Middle School, which are 0.35 mile southwest and 0.36 mile northeast, respectively. In addition to camps, the Ferneke Building is used to host spring and summer camps. Spring Camp occurs one week out of the year. Summer Camps occur nine weeks out of the year (City of South San Francisco Parks and Recreation 2023). As discussed under Sections 3.IX(a) and 3.IX(b) above, the project would comply with applicable regulations and laws pertaining to the transport, storage, use, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment related to hazardous materials. Therefore, the project would not handle hazardous materials in a way that would emit hazardous emissions. Common handling of pool chemicals and small amounts of materials such as cleaning materials is unlikely to impact local schools. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 169 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less than Significant with Mitigation. California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires various state agencies to compile lists of hazardous waste disposal facilities, unauthorized release from underground storage tanks, contaminated drinking water wells, and solid waste facilities from which there is known migration of hazardous waste, and to submit such information to the Secretary for Environmental Protection on at least an annual basis. In meeting the provisions in California Government Code Section 65962.5, commonly referred to as the “Cortese List,” database resources such as EnviroStor and GeoTracker provide information regarding identified facilities (DTSC 2023a; SWRCB 2023a). As discussed under Section 3.IX(a), two sites have undergone cleanup for pesticide contamination in the vicinity of the project: the Mantegani site, approximately 300 feet from the project site, at 735 Commercial Avenue; and the Mazzanti Carnation site, approximately 800 feet from the project site, at 781 Tennis Drive. Both sites have undergone cleanup and been certified. In addition, investigations for Orange Memorial Park’s Stormwater Capture Project, approximately 500 feet southwest of the project site, conducted in 2016 identified low levels of organochlorine pesticides in the soil samples collected at depths between 2 and 3.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). For these soil samples, analyses detected concentrations of DDD (at 0.0022 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg], DDE (up to 0.47 mg/kg), DDT (up to 0.38 mg/kg), and dieldrin (up to 0.17 mg/kg). All these detected concentrations were at or below respective Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) for commercial shallow soil exposure and any soil depth exposures for construction workers (Fugro Consultant, Inc. 2016). Investigations for the Stormwater Capture Project also identified elevated levels of arsenic in the soil that are likely the result of historic chemical use, as well as its presence in local bedrock materials that have been used as import fill (City of South San Francisco 2019). Soil sampling for the Stormwater Capture Project detected the presence of arsenic in all samples at a range of 1.0 to 3.0 mg/kg (Fugro Consultant, Inc. 2016). These concentrations fall within the expected range of naturally occurring arsenic for the area. While this concentration is higher than DTSC/RWQCB ESL, the concentrations do not rise to levels that raise agency concern (e.g., 1,000 or 10,000 times above the ESL). Construction would involve excavation, and grading, and the movement of soils and dust emissions from these activities which could cause a temporary impact to the public or the environment. Short-term soil exposure would potentially affect construction workers due to the potential presence of low levels of organochlorine pesticides and arsenic as detected in the soil samples at the adjacent Water Capture Project. All construction activities would be required to comply with applicable policies, standards, and regulations to ensure there are no hazards related to the routine use, disposal, transport, or accidental release of hazardous materials (California Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] requirements, Title 8 and 22 of the Code of California Regulations). All excavated fill and native soil material would be disposed in accordance with applicable codes and regulations and the transport and disposal of these materials is not expected to create a significant hazard to construction workers or the nearby community. According to EnviroStor and GeoTracker,. no hazardous contamination sites are located on the project site. The Mantegani site and Mazzanti site both completed cleanups and were certified; therefore, they do not present a danger of contamination. While arsenic levels were above the Commercial Shallow Soil exposure ESL and Any Land Use/Any Soil Depth Exposure for a Construction Worker ESL, throughout California arsenic levels have been found higher than ESLs due to historic chemical usage and from its presence in local bedrock materials, which have been used as import fill (Fugro Consultants, Inc. 2016). 170 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 43 The original pool building was constructed and opened in 1970. All buildings built before 1978 are presumed to contain lead paint. The County or its Contractor must develop and implement a demolition debris management and disposal plan for the non-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous materials that are to be removed from the project site per compliance with County waste diversion requirements in San Mateo County Code of Ordinances, Section 4.105.030 (100 percent of inert solids and at least 50 percent of the remaining construction and demolition debris tonnage). The plan must be designed to prevent releases of hazardous materials in quantities that could pose a risk to human health and the environment, as determined using appropriate BAAQMD, RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate agency screening thresholds. Compliance with state and federal requirements and implementation of the debris management and disposal plan specified in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would ensure the project has a less-than-significant impact on the public or the environment related to disposal of hazardous materials. The impact is less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: The County or its Contractor must develop and implement a demolition debris management and disposal plan for the non-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous materials that are to be removed from the project site per compliance with County waste diversion requirements in San Mateo County Code of Ordinances, Section 4.105.030 (100 percent of inert solids and at least 50 percent of the remaining construction and demolition debris tonnage). The plan must be designed to prevent releases of hazardous materials in quantities that could pose a risk to human health and the environment, as determined using appropriate BAAQMD, RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate agency screening thresholds. Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: The construction contractor (as required by the contract specifications) shall develop a Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan (HMCP) that includes standard construction measures required by federal, state, and local policies for the handling of potential hazardous materials and removal of on-site debris. The HMCP shall include the implementation of a Waste Management Plan (WMP) for the management of all construction waste, and a Safety Management Plan (SMP) to minimize construction worker’s exposure to dust emissions and emissions that have the potential to contain hazardous concentrations of arsenic. At a minimum, this plan shall include the following: a. Soils on the project site should be tested for arsenic and organochlorine pesticides prior to grading and excavation. b. If contaminated soils or other hazardous materials are encountered during any soil moving operation during construction, the HMCP shall be implemented. c. Instruct workers on recognition and reporting of materials that may be hazardous. d. Minimize delays by continuing performance of the work in areas not affected by hazardous materials operations. e. Identify and contact subcontractors and licensed personnel qualified to undertake storage, removal, transportation, disposal, and other remedial work required by, and in accordance with, laws and regulations. f. Forward to engineer, copies of reports, permits, receipts, and other documentation related to remedial work. g. Notify such agencies as are required to be notified by laws and regulations within the time stipulated by such laws and regulations. 171 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 h. File requests for adjustments to contract time and contract price due to the finding of hazardous materials in the work site in accordance with conditions of contract. Implementation of a mitigation measures HAZ-1, Demolition Debris Management and Disposal Plan, and HAZ-2, Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan, would reduce potentially significant impacts from exposure to soil contaminants, and elements of building debris such as lead paint to less than significant levels. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? Less than Significant. The project is located approximately 2.1 miles northeast of the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) and is within the jurisdiction of the SFO Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The project is located within the boundaries of two subareas of Airport Influence Area B (Figure 6). The 14 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 77 Subpart C. Conical Surface zone establishes obstruction standards for the airspace around airports including approach zones, conical zones, transitional zones, and horizontal zones known as “imaginary surfaces.” The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) considers objects penetrating these surfaces as obstructions to navigation and requires marking and lighting them for avoidance. The project site is located in an area that would require clearance measures of structures between 100 and 150 feet above ground surface (City/County Associations of Governments of San Mateo County [C/CAG] 2012). Project structures would have a maximum height of approximately 30 feet above ground surface; therefore, it would not impact the conical surface zone and no impact would occur. The second subarea (Outer Boundary for TERPS approach One Engine Inoperative (OEI) departure surfaces) is a safety zone for airplane approach and departure areas. It also identifies imaginary airspace surfaces (FAA Order 8260.3B, U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures [TERPS]) designed to ensure the safe separation of aircraft operating under instrument procedures from man-made and natural obstructions. The critical aeronautical surfaces where the project is located are more than 150 feet above ground level (C/CAG 2012). Project structures would have a maximum height of approximately 30 feet above ground surface; therefore the project would not impact the TERPS imaginary airspace surfaces and this impact would be less than significant. 172 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 45 Figure 6. San Francisco International Airport, Airport Influence Areas. 173 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project were to interfere with roadway operations used in conjunction with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan or would generate sufficient traffic to create traffic congestion that would interfere with the execution of such a plan. During short-term construction activities including the associated roadway improvements, partial or complete road closures may be required along both Tennis Drive and W. Orange Avenue to accommodate utility trenching for installation of storm drains, domestic water, and fire water lines, and road improvements and striping. Closures would not impact individual access to other properties. The City’s General Plan does not identify emergency evacuation routes. W. Orange Avenue is identified as an arterial boulevard and Tennis Drive is identified as a collector street. During the construction phase, the City would require an encroachment permit for any temporary activities that would affect the public right-of-way. Encroachment permit conditions would include a traffic control plan with temporary procedures for emergency access. Additionally, in the event of complete or partial lane closures, sufficient alternative routes exist near the facility and the project would not interfere or result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and this impact would be less than significant. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? No Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project is located in proximity to wildland areas and would pose a potential fire hazard, which could affect persons or structures in the area in the event of a fire. CalFire maps Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs) in State Responsibility Areas (SRAs), as well as Very High FHSZs in Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs). The project site is in an LRA and is under the jurisdiction of the South San Francisco Fire Department. There are no Very High FHSZs mapped in South San Francisco (CalFire 2008). San Bruno Mountain, 0.8 mile north of the project site, is in a Moderate FHSZ in an SRA (CalFire 2022). The project site is regularly maintained by City Park and Recreation staff and generally lacks combustible native vegetation. The project would replace an existing public pool and aquatic center with a new pool complex. It would not draw additional people to an area subject to wildland fires. Therefore, no impact would occur. X. Hydrology and Water Quality Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ 174 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 47 Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less than Significant. Activities associated with construction of the project could have a significant impact if they resulted in violation of waste discharge requirements under the San Francisco Bay RWCQB’s Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit from contaminated runoff entering the stormwater system. The project site is not adjacent to any water bodies. Colma Creek, approximately 40 feet southwest of the project, is the closest water body. The SMCWPPP is a partnership of C/CAG, each incorporated city and town in the County, and the County, which share a common NPDES permit. The Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit was issued by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 2022) in compliance with the San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan and the NPDES Program. Participating agencies (including the County and City) must comply with the provisions of the countywide permit by ensuring that new development and redevelopment mitigate, to the maximum extent practicable, water quality impacts from stormwater runoff during both construction and operational periods of projects (County of San Mateo 2023). CONSTRUCTION The proposed project would disturb greater than 1 acre of land and must obtain an individual NPDES General Construction Permit for the stormwater discharges during construction and implement a SWPPP for the site. The SWPPP would include the implementation of erosion and sedimentation BMPs, monitoring, and reporting that would reduce surface and groundwater quality impacts. It must also include a drainage control plan with site-specific BMPs that are designed to prevent runoff from 175 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 construction areas to reduce potential impacts to surface water quality during project construction. The plan would also include design elements and BMPs for construction areas, such as fueling and equipment washing areas and trash and hazardous material storage areas. No construction would occur during major rain events, minimizing any chance of runoff from the site. Major rain events would be considered as a prediction of 0.25 inch or more in 24 hours. As described in Section 2.5, Construction, construction of the aquatic center would require demolition of the existing pool building, pool, and parking area; clearing and grading activities; filling portions of the project site to elevate them out of the floodplain; construction of the building, pools, and parking area; and trenching for utilities. The project would result in temporary disturbance of approximately 6.5 acres on-site, plus an additional approximately 2 acres for temporary staging, and would permanently develop approximately 6.5 acres. Construction activities associated with the aquatic center would require the presence of construction vehicles, heavy equipment and materials, and construction crews. Construction activity, including demolition, site grading, excavation, and the construction of the aquatic center, would result in temporary soil erosion that could temporarily affect water quality. In addition to stormwater runoff and potential resulting water quality and sedimentation impacts, there is the potential for hazardous materials, including petroleum products associated with diesel vehicle and equipment use and contaminants from paving materials, concrete mixing, pouring and washout, and sanitary facilities, to leave the site. OPERATION Following construction, the project site would be restored and landscaped surrounding the new aquatic center, including stormwater retention and treatment areas, thereby reducing any future water quality impacts. Approximately 1,855 square feet of LID treatment areas would be added on-site. Stormwater would be directed to these areas before discharging to the existing storm drain in W. Orange Avenue. The project would comply with all stormwater requirements of the SWRCB and the County, and would include bioretention basins and treatment areas adequate to treat runoff from the additional impervious surface area, Therefore, water quality impacts associated with the new aquatic center would be less than significant b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less than Significant. California Water Service Company (CalWater) provides water service to the City. CalWater obtains the majority of its water from the San Francisco Water Department and supplies approximately 1,534 acre-feet3 per year (AFY) to the City from local groundwater wells. The project overlays the Westside Groundwater Basin (DWR Basin 2-35). Municipal and agricultural groundwater wells in the Basin range from depths of 130 to 825 feet (Department of Water Resources [DWR] 2006). CalWater operates groundwater wells in the Basin that serve its South San Francisco District (CalWater 2021). The basin is not adjudicated and DWR has determined the Basin is not in a state of critical overdraft and is a low priority for adjudication (CalWater 2021). A potentially significant impact would occur if a project includes deep excavations resulting in the potential to interfere with groundwater movement, the withdrawal of groundwater, or paving of existing permeable surfaces important to groundwater recharge. The project would excavate to a depth of 12 feet, which would not be likely to significantly impact the groundwater table or groundwater movement. In the 3 An acre-foot is a volume of water equal to a sheet of water 1 acre in area and 1 foot thick, or 43,560 cubic feet of water. 176 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 49 adjacent Stormwater Capture Project, groundwater was determined to be at a minimum depth of approximately 12 to 13 feet below ground surface (City of South San Francisco 2019). Excavations for the pools and utilities would be limited in scope but may encounter shallow groundwater which would require dewatering during construction. However, dewatering for construction would be short term and temporary, and construction would not include excavation to depths that could affect groundwater movement or well production; therefore, construction of the project would be unlikely to significantly impact groundwater movement and this impact would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: c-i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less than Significant. Planned earthwork and grading activities on the project site would involve a maximum total cut and fill of approximately 10,670 cubic yards – approximately 9,700 cubic yards of cut and 970 cubic yards of fill. The project site is essentially flat, and all project components would be required to implement erosion control measures, as discussed under Section 3.X(a). Construction of the project would include implementation of SWPPP BMPs under the State Water Board General Construction Permit and SMCWPPP. Implementation of the SWPPP would reduce potential erosion and sedimentation from project construction to less-than-significant levels. Operation of the project would result in an increase of impervious surface compared to existing conditions of approximately 17,215 square feet. Therefore, the project would qualify as a C.3 regulated project under the SMCWPPP. Under the C.3 program, the project is required to incorporate controls to reduce pollutant runoff in stormwater. Most controls are required to be LID measures, which include: biotreatment areas, flowthrough planters, rain barrels or cisterns, green roofs, pervious pavement, or other stormwater treatment measures designed to infiltrate or detain stormwater runoff, so that all of the runoff required to be treated per the stormwater permit soaks into the ground, is stored for irrigation or in- building use, evaporates, or is taken up by plants. These requirements apply to most projects that create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area (FlowstoBay 2023). The aquatic center and surrounding area would drain to new LID treatment areas on-site, including vegetated stormwater channels. The project will install a new connection to the existing storm drain main on W. Orange Avenue, which ultimately outfalls to Colma Creek; therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in a manner that would cause erosion. Compliance with the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit and Planning Department requirements will reduce drainage and stormwater impacts to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site resulting in substantial erosion or siltation, and the impact would be less than significant. c-ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project results in increased runoff volumes during construction or operation of the project that would result in flooding conditions affecting the project site or nearby properties. As described in Sections 3.X(a) and 3.10(b), the project would result in an increase in impervious surface area of approximately 17,215 square feet and would construct new vegetated stormwater channels which would capture runoff from the additional square footage resulting 177 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 from a 10-year, 2-hour storm event.4 Compliance with the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit and Planning Department requirements would reduce drainage and stormwater impacts to a less-than- significant level. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site resulting in a substantial increase in the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site, and the impact would be less than significant. c-iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than Significant. As described in Sections 3.X(a) and 3.X(b), the project would result in an increase in impervious surface area of approximately 17,215 square feet and would construct new vegetated stormwater channels that would have adequate capacity to contain runoff from the additional square footage. The LID treatment areas would discharge to the stormwater system in W. Orange Avenue, which discharges to Colma Creek. Compliance with the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit and Planning Department requirements would reduce drainage and stormwater impacts to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, the project would not exceed the capacity of the existing and/or planned stormwater drain system or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and the impact would be less than significant. c-iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project were located in a flood hazard area and would impede or redirect flood flows. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, the project site is in 100-year flood hazard zone AE, with a base flood elevation of approximately 26 feet above mean sea level (amsl). However, one of the objectives of the recently completed Stormwater Capture Project is to alleviate localized flooding in lower reaches of Colma Creek. The water capture facility would divert approximately 5 percent of the water flows from Colma Creek through an inlet structure approximately 870 feet west and upstream of the proposed project. The underground reservoir is capable of holding 7.5 acre-feet (2.44 million gallons) and stored water would be used for irrigation and infiltration with a 0.5-inch-per-hour drawdown rate. Excess water would discharge to Colma Creek via an outfall pipe situated immediately south of the existing basketball courts and approximately 500 feet southwest of the proposed project. The storm water capture project will reduce flows in the creek and reduce overall flood risks down-stream, thereby reducing flood risk on the project site and surrounding neighborhoods The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map has not been updated since the Water Capture Project was completed, and the new 100-year flood elevation is calculated to be 23.8 feet amsl. The existing elevation in the vicinity of the existing parking lot is between 25.3 and 25.5 feet amsl, therefore, the project site would be unlikely to be vulnerable to flooding from Colma Creek. The project would be required to raise the floor of the pool building to one foot above flood stage or 24.8 feet amsl. In grading the site, the project would raise the floor of the pool facilities to 26.25 feet amsl, which is above the 100- year floodplain. Therefore, the project would redirect flood flows around the pool building. However, the difference in elevation would be up to approximately one foot compared to existing conditions, therefore, the effect of redirecting flood flows would be minimal and this impact would be less than significant. 4 A 10-year, 2-hour storm means a storm of 2 hours duration that is capable of producing a volume of rainfall expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average of once in 10 years. 178 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 51 d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less than Significant. The project site is in a FEMA flood hazard zone AE with a base flood elevation of approximately 23.8 feet (Kim-Van Truong 2023). Flood hazard zone AE is defined as an area with a 1 percent annual chance of flooding, and with a calculated base flood elevation (FEMA 2023). Chapter 15.56 of the City’s Municipal Code includes regulations to minimize damage to public facilities and utilities from flood events. Section 15.56.030(b) requires that facilities vulnerable to floods be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction. Under the municipal code, the floodplain administrator must review all development permits to determine that the site is reasonably safe from flooding; that the proposed development does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of areas where base flood elevations have been determined but a floodway has not been designated; and that documentation of certification for the project meets requirements for construction in a flood zone. Under Section 15.56.160(c)(2), all nonresidential construction in flood zones must be either elevated or floodproofed. The pool facilities will be elevated above the flood hazard zone as part of the grading work; therefore, impacts from flooding would be less than significant. The project site is not located in either a seiche or tsunami zone (City of South San Francisco 2022a). A seiche is a standing wave that oscillates back and forth in an enclosed or partially enclosed body of water. Seiche waves may be caused by earthquakes, and the project is in an area with high seismic activity. Although the project is not in an identified seiche zone, earthquake ground shaking could cause seiche waves in the new pools that could potentially splash out and cause flooding inside the facility. The pools are relatively small and seiche waves within the pools would not be likely be large enough to cause damage. The project would follow the geotechnical recommendations during design and construction to ensure seismic stability. Therefore, impacts from seiche waves would be less than significant. The project is not located in a tsunami zone; therefore, no impact from tsunami waves would occur. e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less than Significant. The proposed project will abide by all requirements of the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program and the Municipal Regional Permit issued by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. The project would not conflict with the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin because it would comply with all applicable requirements of the MRP. The project site is not located in a groundwater basin and would not directly use groundwater; therefore, it would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 179 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 XI. Land Use and Planning Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project site is located in Orange Memorial Park, which is an urban City park. The site is zoned as Parks and Recreation (PR) under the City’s General Plan and zoning code. Surrounding land uses are predominantly Parks and Recreation, Low Density Residential (RL), Medium Density Residential (RM) Downtown Residential – Low (DRL), Downtown Residential – Medium (DRM), and High Density Residential (RH) (City of South San Francisco 2023f). The project would replace an existing aquatic center and parking lot with a new aquatic center and parking lot in an existing City park. Therefore, the project would not change the nature of land uses or physically divide an established community. No impact would occur. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation. The project fulfills the City’s 2040 General Plan Policy PR-7.6, which seeks to modernize the aquatics facilities at Orange Memorial Park and expand the pools in order to enable the expansion of aquatics programming. The project also includes EV charging stations (Policy PR-7.11) and integrates sustainable landscape strategies (Policy PR-7.8) including planting 36 trees, using low-water landscaping, and using green infrastructure for stormwater capture. The project is located in the Airport Influence Area of San Francisco International Airport, in the 14 CFR Part 77 Subpart C. Conical Surface zone and the Outer Boundary for TERPS approach OEI departure surfaces. As discussed in Section 3.IX(e), both areas define the safe height of structures in the zones. In both cases, the safe height is more than 150 feet above ground surface. The new aquatic center would be approximately 30 feet in height; therefore, the project would be well below the imaginary airspace surfaces and no impact would occur. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any plans, policies, or regulations and no impact would occur. 180 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 53 XII. Mineral Resources Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project site is located in an area used or available for extraction of a regionally important mineral resource, if a project would convert an existing or future regionally important mineral extraction use to another use, or if a project would affect access to a site used or potentially available for regionally important mineral resource extraction. The project is not located in a mineral resource zone identified by the state (Stinson et al. 1982). Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources of statewide or regional significance would occur. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. A significant impact would occur if a project were located in an area used or available for extraction of a locally important mineral resource and the project converted an existing or potential future locally important mineral extraction use to another use, or if a project affected access to a site in use or potentially available for locally important mineral resource extraction. The project is located in a City park in the middle of an urban area. Neither the project site nor the surrounding area is identified as an area containing mineral deposits of local significance in the City’s 2040 General Plan. Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources of local significance would occur. 181 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 XIII. Noise Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project result in: (a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation Municipal Code Chapter 8.32 sets regulations for exterior noise levels (Section 8.32.030). Maximum permissible sound levels in Table 3 are the standards for a cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour. The maximum allowable noise level is determined by the land use category of the nearest sensitive receptor properties. The Noise Ordinance limits noise levels in single-family or multiple-family residential areas to 60 decibels (dBA) between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Section 8.32.030(a) states it is unlawful for any person to operate any source of sound at any location within the City, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property to exceed: 1. The noise level standard for the specified land use for a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes in any hour; 2. The noise level standard plus 5 dB for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour; 3. The noise level standard plus 10 dB for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour; 4. The noise level standard plus 15 dB for a cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour; or 5. The noise level standard or the maximum measured ambient level, plus 20 dB for any period of time. Table 3. Noise Level Standards Land Use Category Time Period Noise Level (dB) Single-family or duplex residential 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 50 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 60 Multiple-family residential or mixed residential/commercial 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 55 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 60 Commercial districts 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 60 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 65 182 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 55 Land Use Category Time Period Noise Level (dB) Parks districts 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 70 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 70 dB = decibels Source: South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 8.32.030 (2023) Municipal Code Section 8.32.040 regulates interior noise limits for multifamily residential property. Section 8.32.050(d) indicates that a noise level more than 10 dB above the level allowed by Section 8.32.030 measured 3 feet from any wall, floor, or ceiling inside any unit on the same property when the windows and doors of the unit are closed is unallowable. The City’s Municipal Code Section 8.32.050 allows construction activities that are authorized by a valid City permit between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. Other hours may be authorized by the construction permit if the project meets one of the following criteria: (1) No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding 90 dB at a distance of 25 feet. If the device is housed within a structure or trailer on the property, the measurement shall be made outside the structure at a distance as close to twenty-five feet from the equipment as possible; or (2) The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed 90 dB (Municipal Code Section 8.32.050). According to Municipal Code Section 8.32.060, Exception Permits, if the applicant can show to the City Manager, or the Manager’s designee, that a diligent investigation of available noise abatement techniques indicates that immediate compliance with the requirements of this chapter would be impracticable or unreasonable, a permit to allow exception from the provisions contained in this chapter may be issued, with appropriate conditions to minimize the public determinant caused by such exceptions. Any such permit shall be of as short a duration as possible, but in no case for longer than 6 months. These permits are renewable upon a showing of good cause, and shall be conditioned by a schedule for compliance and details of compliance methods in appropriate cases. a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project would result in a significant impact if it would: 1. Allow construction to occur outside of hours specified in the permit, 2. Produce construction noise in excess of 90 dB at a distance of 25 feet or exceed 90 dB at any point outside the property plane of the project, or 3. Produce operational noise in excess of 60 dB at neighboring residential properties. Residences, schools, hotels, child care facilities, and convalescent facilities are typically considered noise sensitive land uses. The nearest potential residential receptors to the project site are single-family homes and duplexes located approximately 70 feet north on Tennis Drive, 80 feet north on Circle Court, 100 feet east on Amberwood Circle, and 140 feet northeast on Railroad Avenue. In addition, recreational users of the children’s playground facility immediately west, users of the Fernekes Building approximately 150 183 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 feet southwest (including spring and summer camps), and playing fields south of the project would be subjected to construction noise. The maximum ambient sound levels within residential land use areas are assumed to be less than 65 dBA (City of South San Francisco 2010). Primary noise sources within the vicinity of the project site include vehicle traffic from El Camino Real and local street traffic from W. Orange Avenue, Tennis Drive, North Canal Street, Circle Court, Railroad Avenue, surrounding roadways, and outdoor recreational uses. Secondary noise sources include aircraft overflights from SFO, distant train noise from approximately Caltrain (0.9 mile to the east), and distant traffic noise from U.S. Highway 101 (approximately 1 mile to the east). Project construction would include use of standard construction equipment, including excavators, graders, tractors, loaders, pavers, jackhammers, hoe rams, and cement trucks (Table 4). No pile driving is proposed. Noise from project construction would come from two general sources. Vehicles carrying the construction crew commuting to the site, as well as truck transport of construction equipment and materials to the site, would incrementally increase noise levels on roads leading to the site. In addition, use of heavy construction equipment and hand tools during construction would incrementally increase noise levels on the site. Worker commute and truck trips would result in intermittent noise increases on local roads but would not affect long-term ambient noise levels. The second type of short‐term noise impact is related to noise generated during demolition, excavation, grading, and construction on the project site. Construction is performed in discrete steps, or phases, each with its own mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would change the character of the noise generated on-site. Therefore, the noise levels vary as construction progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction‐related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. Louder types of construction equipment include graders, scrapers, and auger drill rigs as well as concrete saws, concrete grinders and hoe rams (see Table 4). The loudest phase of construction would likely be the demolition of the existing pool facility, followed by the excavation and grading phases. Table 4. Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels Construction Equipment Noise Level (dB Lmax1 at 50 feet) Air compressor 78 Backhoe 78 Chain saw 84 Compactor 84 Concrete grinder 90 Concrete mixer truck 79 Concrete saw 90 Crane 81 Dozer 82 Dump truck 76 Flat bed truck 74 Front end loader 79 Generator 81 Grader 85 184 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 57 Construction Equipment Noise Level (dB Lmax1 at 50 feet) Hoe ram 90 Jackhammer 89 Paver 77 Roller 80 Scraper 84 Lmax is the instantaneous maximum noise level for a specified period of time. Source: Federal Highway Administration (2006) For the proposed project, the combined loudest pieces of equipment , during demolition and grading could reach 90 dBA outside the property plane of the construction activity (U.S. Department of Transportation [USDOT]/Federal Highway Administration 2006), which is the noise limit defined in the City code . These higher noise levels could be generated during (1) the use of concrete saws and hoe ram during demolition of the old pool facility, and (2) the use of earth-moving equipment and excavation activities and grading. If a valid City permit is obtained, construction activities would comply with the South San Francisco Noise Regulations, as long as no individual piece of equipment produces noise levels that exceed the construction noise limit of 90 dB at the property line. Since the project would replace an existing pool complex, operational noise would not vary significantly from the existing conditions. With implementation of the following Mitigation Measure NOI-1, the project would result in less than significant impacts related to generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels that are in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies: Mitigation Measure NOI-1: The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction noise impacts: a. Secure a valid City permit for construction noise levels that could potentially temporarily exceed 90 dB at the park’s property line in order to comply with the South San Francisco Noise Regulations. b. Construction equipment and haul trucks shall use the best available noise control techniques, including improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically attenuating barriers, curtains, and shields. c. Site stationary noise sources, such as air compressors and generators, as far from adjacent sensitive receptors as possible. These sources shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds or incorporate insulation barriers, shields, or other attenuating measures. d. If impact equipment and machinery are used such as jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills, they shall be hydraulically or electrically powered to avoid noise associated with air compressors or pneumatically powered tools. If the use of pneumatically powered tools is necessary, an exhaust muffler shall be installed on the air compressor. Such a muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to 10 dBA. Similarly, the installation of external jackets on the tools can reduce noise levels by 5 dBA. 185 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 e. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment, staging, and parking areas shall be located as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (i.e. adjacent tot lot and summer camps in the Ferneke Building. f. Identify a liaison that represents the property owners located adjacent to the project site along Tennis Drive. This liaison shall be contacted with concerns regarding construction noise. The liaison’s contact information shall be clearly displayed at the construction location on posted signs informing the public of the construction hours and the liaison to contact in the event of a noise-related problem. g. Notify all adjacent landowners and occupants of the properties adjacent to the project site of the anticipated construction schedule at least 2 weeks prior to ground-disturbing activities. h. Hold a pre-construction meeting with the Contractor Superintendent, General Contractor, and City inspectors to confirm that all noise mitigation measures (including signage on construction hours, valid City exception permit, and liaison contact information) are completed. b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant. Groundborne vibration is the perceptible movement of building floors, rattling windows, and doors, shaking of items on shelves or walls, and rumbling sounds. For groundborne vibration, according to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines, a vibration level of 65 vibration decibels (VdB) is the threshold of perceptibility for humans.5 For a significant impact to occur, vibration levels must exceed 80 VdB during infrequent events (USDOT/FTA 2018). Construction activities (e.g., ground-disturbing activities, including movement of heavy construction equipment and hauling of demolition debris and soil from the project site) may generate localized groundborne vibration and noise. Blasting or pile-driving activities would not occur during construction of the project. A hoe ram, jackhammers and concrete saws would be used during demolition of the existing parking lot and pool building. A vibratory roller would be used for parking lot construction. Generally, construction- related groundborne vibration is not expected to extend beyond 25 feet from the generating source. Construction equipment for demolition of the existing parking lot and pool building which could include jackhammers, concrete saws, and a compactor machine (vibratory pad or drum roller). The closest sensitive receptors are residences approximately 75 feet from the northern edge of the project area. The activities closest to the adjacent residences include the movement of haul trucks. Hauling of soils and debris could generate vibrations along local haul routes. Assuming the use of 12-cubic-yard dump trucks, the project is anticipated to require a total of approximately 875 round-trip trucks trips to offhaul soil and demolition debris over the 18-month construction period. The maximum haul trips per day would likely be 8 one-way trips per day during the parking lot demolition and building demolition phases. The movement of up to 8 haul trucks per day would not generate significant amounts of groundborne vibration, therefore this impact would be less than significant. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less than Significant. The nearest airport to the project site is SFO, located approximately 2.1 miles to the southeast. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, aircraft noise from SFO is the primary source of 5 VdB is the vibration velocity level expressed in decibels relative to 1 micro-inch per second (1 × 10-6 inch per second). 186 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 59 transportation noise in the City. The project site is located within the SFO ALUCP Airport Influence Area B (Figure 6), which is based on a combination of the outer boundaries of the noise compatibility and airport safety zones (C/CAG 2012). However, the project site is located outside the aircraft noise exposure contour (CNEL Contour; see Figure 6). Therefore, because the project is outside the airport noise exposure contour and would not introduce residents or employees to the area, it would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels associated with the nearby airport and noise impacts would be less than significant. d) Population and Housing Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. City and county General Plans develop growth plans and projections for the areas in their jurisdictions. A significant impact would occur if a project included a General Plan amendment that could result in an increase in population over that projected in the adopted General Plan, or if a project would induce substantial growth on the project site or surrounding area. Construction job opportunities created as a result of the project are not expected to result in any substantial population growth in the area. The work requirements of most construction projects are highly specialized so that construction workers remain at a job site only for the time frame during which their specific skills are needed. Additionally, the construction workers would likely be supplied from the region’s labor pool. Construction workers would not be likely to relocate their household as a consequence of working on the project, and as such, significant housing or population impacts would not result from construction of the project. Therefore, there would be no construction-related population growth impacts and no impact would occur. The project would replace an existing aquatics center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields; therefore, while the aquatics center will be able to offer additional programs, the project is not likely to attract more people to Orange Memorial Park and the surrounding area or cause people to move to the area. Therefore, the project would not introduce new persons to the population, and no impact would occur. 187 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project would replace an existing aquatics center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields. Therefore, the project would not displace people or housing, and no impact would occur. XIV. Public Services Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Schools? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? No Impact. The project would replace an existing aquatics center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields; therefore, it would not increase the population in the area or introduce a hazard. A significant impact may occur if the South San Francisco Fire Department (SSFFD) could not adequately serve a project, and a new or physically altered fire station would be necessary. The project area receives fire protection services from the SSFFD. The SSFFD has three fire stations. The project site is in the response area for Fire Station 61, which is located at 480 North Canal Street, approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the project site. In addition, Fire Station 63 is located at 33 Arroyo Drive, approximately 0.57 mile west of the project site (City of South San Francisco 2023h). The project would not increase population or cause a marked increase in recreational users, and no impact to fire protection services would occur. 188 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 61 Police protection? No Impact. A significant impact may occur if the South San Francisco Police Department (Police Department) could not adequately serve a project, and a new or physically altered police station would be necessary. The project area receives law enforcement services from the Patrol Division of the Police Department. The Patrol Division consists of 40 officers and four patrol beats covering 11 square miles of the City. The Police Station located at 1 Chestnut Avenue is located approximately 0.4 mile west of the project site (City of South San Francisco 2023i). The project would replace an existing aquatic center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields; therefore, it would not increase the population in the area or introduce a hazard. The project would not cause an appreciable increase in recreational users. Therefore, the project would not increase the demand for public services, including police protection, and no impacts to police protection would occur. Schools? No impact. The project area is served by the South San Francisco Unified School District (SSFUSD). A significant impact may occur if the SSFUSD could not adequately serve a project, and a new or physically altered school or schools would be necessary. The SSFUSD has nine elementary schools, three middle schools, three high schools, and an adult education program. Between 2011 and 2021, the enrollment declined by 1,306 students. Enrollment projections between 2021 and 2030 show an expected decrease in student population from 8,006 students to 6,759 students; a decrease of 1,247 or approximately 15.6 percent (South San Francisco Unified School District 2022). The project would replace an existing aquatic center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields; therefore, it would not increase the population in the area or cause a marked increase in recreational users. The project would not increase the demand for public services, including schools, and no impact would occur. Parks? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if the project would result in the need for new or improved parks. The Orange Pool is the only indoor municipal swimming pool in the City. The pool operates year-round and 7 days a week. The existing pool was constructed in 1970, and prior to the pandemic, public demand for aquatic programs has grown year over year, well beyond the pool’s capacity. The pool has exceeded the typical lifespan for such facilities and is due for replacement (City of South San Francisco 2023c). The new facility would include two pools—an outdoor, 25-yard, cool water lap pool and an indoor, warm water, teaching/recreation pool—and would enable the City to expand offerings of recreation activities in the aquatic center. The existing pool would remain in use until the new pool is completed and would then be demolished. While the project would remove a portion of the existing soccer field area, reducing the total area of grass field area, by about 7,200 square feet, the remaining grass field would be retained and continued to be designed for recreation use, including soccer practices and games. The project would also temporarily fence the entire soccer field area for use as a staging area during construction. The field would be returned to existing conditions after project completion. Therefore, the proposed project would improve access and opportunities at the aquatic center, continue to provide grass fields for recreation, and would not create a need for new or improved parks. This impact would be less than significant. 189 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 Other public facilities? No impact. A significant impact may occur if the project would result in the need for other new or improved public facilities. Other public facilities include the Community Civic Campus, which includes a new Police Operations and 911 Dispatch Center, South San Francisco Main Library, Community Theater/Council Chamber, and Parks and Recreation facilities. The project would replace an existing aquatics center at Orange Memorial Park and reconfigure existing soccer fields. It would not increase the population in the area or cause an increase in recreational users. Therefore, the project would not increase the demand for public services, including libraries, theater, or other uses, and no impact would occur. XV. Recreation Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than Significant. A project would result in a significant impact to parks and recreation services if it would result in a significant increase in population from adding residential units. The project would replace an existing aquatic center and reconfigure existing soccer fields. It would not increase the population in the area or cause an increase in recreational users. It would allow an expansion of services at the aquatic center and allow the facility to serve more residents. As noted in Section X, while the project would permanently remove a portion of the existing soccer field area, reducing the total area of grass field by about 7,200 square feet, the remaining grass field would be retained and continued to be designed for recreation use, including soccer practices and games. Post- project, the area would be reduced from three to two soccer fields and the two remaining fields would be improved. During the 18-month construction period, the entire field area would be fenced off and used for construction staging, so all three soccer fields would be unavailable. The existing Orange Aquatic facility was deemed insufficient for the needs of the City’s residents. The project would more than double the available space for aquatic programs, allowing increased use for recreation, classes, and programs. Therefore, although the project would, increase the use of existing park facilities, it would not result in substantial physical deterioration and this impact would be less than significant. 190 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 63 b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant. The project would replace and improve existing aquatic center facilities; therefore, it would not increase the population in the area but would allow for an increase in recreational users. Although the project would expand an existing recreational facility, it would not have a significant, adverse physical effect on the environment. As discussed in Sections 3.IV, Biological Resources, 3.V, Cultural Resources, 3.VII, Geology and Soils, and 3.XVII, Tribal Cultural Resources, all potentially significant impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level by mitigation incorporated into the project. The project would allow the City to expand recreation at the new aquatic facility, but this would not change the operational impacts of the existing pool, and this impact would be less than significant. XVI. Transportation Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation REGIONAL AND LOCAL ACCESS Regional access is provided by Highways 101 and 280, El Camino Real, Westborough Boulevard/Chestnut Avenue, and Grand Avenue. Local access is provided by W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive. PUBLIC TRANSIT The project site is served by San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Bus Route 37, which has a stop at the corner of W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive. The bus route offers connections to Daly City, San Bruno, Alta Loma School, and Daly City Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) via Route 130. In addition, the Free South City Shuttle stops at the corner of W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive. The Free South City Shuttle provides a circular route within the City connecting schools, parks, the Municipal Services Building, downtown area, Kaiser Hospital, and senior centers, and provide connecting transportation to SamTrans stops and the SSF BART station (City of South San Francisco 2023j). Caltrain and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) stations are both located approximately 1 mile east of the project. 191 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 64 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRANSIT Centennial Way is a 2.85-mile-long Class 1 bicycle/pedestrian trail that will eventually run from the City of Colma to the City of Millbrae. The trail crosses W. Orange Avenue approximately 0.25 mile south of the project, and connects to San Bruno BART Station, Tanforan Shopping Center, South San Francisco High School, El Camino High School, and South San Francisco BART station (City of South San Francisco 2023b). The project would include the installation of one indoor and eight outdoor bicycle racks. The project would include ADA-approved sidewalks and paved walkways accessing the aquatic complex. It would also improve the existing crosswalk on Tennis Drive by adding traffic calming measures for pedestrian safety (see Figure 3). ADA/EV PARKING There is an existing parking lot on the north side of Tennis Drive accessible by a crosswalk across Tennis Drive. The project includes a new parking and drop-off area with six ADA parking stalls, two EV charging stalls, and five regular parking stalls (see Figure 3). a) Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant. The City’s General Plan Mobility Element includes policies and actions designed to incorporate complete streets improvements into all roadway and development projects, incorporate bicycle and pedestrian improvements into capital projects, address ADA accessibility, expand the low- stress bike and pedestrian network, and expand bicycle parking at major activity centers. The project would include a new parking lot with ADA and EV parking. It would be adjacent to a SamTrans bus stop, providing access to public transit. It would be 0.25 mile from the Centennial Way bicycle and pedestrian path, with access via W. Orange Avenue. The project would include a total of nine bicycle racks. Project construction would result in vehicle worker trips, haul trips, and vendor trips. The cut and fill could generate a total of about 875 haul trips over the construction period – 808 haul trips during construction of the new aquatic center, and 67 trips during the demolition of the existing pool building. The increase in traffic as a result of worker and haul trips would increase traffic at nearby traffic intersections and roadway segments. The project would obtain encroachment permits which would include a Traffic Control Plan. In addition, haul and vendor trips would primarily occur during off-peak hours (9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). The project is on a transit line and would include improvements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, ADA parking, and traffic calming measures; therefore, the project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and this impact would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less than Significant. The new 2019 State CEQA Guidelines require analysis of impacts related to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a result of a project. VMT is the amount and distance of automobile traffic attributable to a project. The City’s General Plan includes goals to reduce VMT and GHG emissions. This analysis is based on a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Trip Generation Assessment provided by Kittleson & Associates (July 17, 2023) (Table 5). The analysis is based on trip generation from the number of lap lanes in the existing pool (six lanes) versus the new pools (17 lanes). 192 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 65 Table 5. Trip Generation Pedestrian Group Counts1 (Existing) Pedestrian Group Counts1 to Proposed Site (Projected) Net New Project Trips Pool Size 6 Lap Lanes 17 Lap Lanes Group Counts Weekday Daily Trips 238 674 436 Saturday Daily Trips 538 1,524 986 Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips 35 100 65 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips 67 190 123 Saturday Peak Hour Trips 99 281 182 1 Pedestrian Groups are the number of groups of people entering the pool facility. The assumption for the VMT analysis is that the demand for swimming is likely already present but residents are using other pools further away, due to limited capacity at the existing pool. An expanded Orange Pool facility will provide additional classes and opportunities for recreational swimmers closer to the City to better meet the demand from South San Francisco residents. Vehicle trip generation is anticipated to increase since both the pool size and number of lap lanes will increase by more than double with the new pool compared to the old pool. The increase in vehicle trip generation is conservatively estimated at 65 trips in the weekday AM peak hour, 123 trips in the weekday PM peak hour, and 182 on a Saturday peak hour. Overall, total daily vehicle trip generation is projected to increase by about 436 on weekdays and 986 on weekends. The development of the project will reduce the overall contribution of pool trips to regional VMT because residents of South San Francisco will be able to use their local pool which has fewer capacity constraints to meet their swimming needs rather than traveling farther away to pools in other communities like the Brisbane Community Pool or the Jean E. Brink Swimming Pool in Pacifica. This reduces the overall trip length for South San Francisco residents, which will reduce regional VMT. Regional VMT with the project is estimated to decrease because an expanded Orange Pool will provide additional capacity to better meet the needs of residents of South San Francisco who will be able to drive to a more local pool rather than one farther away, reducing trip length and VMT. Therefore, the project would not be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines regarding VMT, and this impact would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The project does not include any design features that would increase hazards. The project would replace an existing aquatic center and parking area in a public park. The new parking area would provide additional spaces for ADA parking close to the pool complex. The project would also traffic calming measures for the crosswalk that crosses Tennis Drive. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less than Significant. A significant impact may occur if a project were to interfere with roadway operations used for emergency access or evacuation or would generate sufficient traffic to create traffic congestion that would interfere with the emergency access. 193 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 66 During short-term construction activities including the associated roadway improvements, partial or complete road closures may be required along both Tennis Drive and W. Orange Avenue to accommodate utility trenching for installation of storm drains, domestic water, and fire water lines. Closures would not impact individual access to other properties. The City’s General Plan does not identify emergency evacuation routes. W. Orange Avenue is identified as an arterial boulevard and Tennis Drive is identified as a collector street (City of South San Francisco 2022a). During the construction phase, the City would require an encroachment permit for any temporary activities that would affect the public right-of-way. Encroachment permit conditions would include a traffic control plan with temporary procedures for emergency access. Additionally, in the event of partial lane closures, sufficient alternative routes exist near the facility and the project would not interfere or result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, the project would not result in inadequate emergency service, and this impact would be less than significant. XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: (i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ Environmental Evaluation At the time of the initial European contact with the Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay area, Costanoans (from the Spanish costaños, or “coast people”), members of the Penutian linguistic family, inhabited the area from the Carquinez Strait and the northern tip of the San Francisco Peninsula to the region south of Monterey Bay and east to the Diablo Range. These Native Americans called themselves Ohlone, entered the Bay Area approximately 1,500 years ago. They came from the Delta region and displaced earlier Hokan speakers. An estimated 7,000 to 10,000 Native Americans lived near San Francisco Bay by the time of European contact in the 18th century. According to the City’s General Plan EIR and consistent with the City’s historic as an Ohlone settlement location, there are Native American village sites and archaeological sites scattered around the City of South San Francisco. Known resources 194 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 67 occur along the El Camino Real corridor, in the San Bruno Mountains, and adjacent to portions of Colma Creek. AB 52 establishes a formal consultation process for California tribes in the CEQA process, requiring the lead agency to initiate consultation with California Native American groups when a decision to undertake a project or determination that a project is complete (e.g., prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report), lead agencies are required to notify tribes who previously requested placement on the notification list. On June 23, 2023, the City provided formal notification in writing to eight separate Native American groups. After 30 days, none of the tribes requested AB52 consultation. During the preparation of the Cultural Resources Technical Report, a search of the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was requested on April 26, 2023, with the intent of identifying culturally sensitive areas and obtaining a list of Native American contacts who may have specific knowledge of the vicinity. The NAHC response was received on May 18, 2023, and provided a negative result (there were no identified Sacred Lands onsite) and a list of eight Native American tribes and individuals who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. SWCA sent outreach letters via email to all Native American contacts on May 30, 2023, with hard copies followed by regular mail on June 2, 2023. Follow-up telephone calls were made by SWCA on June 2 and June 8, 2023. Chairperson Irene Zwierlein of the Amah Mutsun Band of Mission San Juan Bautista requested that all persons be aware that railroads were historically built on Native burial grounds. Chairperson Ann Marie Sayers of the Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan requested the CHRIS results, final report, and the evolution and development of the project area, which was provided by SWCA in an email to Chairperson Sayers. Kanyon Sayers Roods responded via email that the project area overlaps or is near the management boundary of a potentially eligible cultural site and that she would like to consult on the project. Thereafter, Kanyon Sayers Roods was reached by phone by the City on September 6, 2023. In that conversation a request was made by Kanyon Sayers Roods for worker awareness training covering tribal cultural resources, and that a Native American monitor from a local tribe be present following the event of the inadvertent discovery of a prehistoric archaeological resource to monitor the treatment of that resource. These requests are reflected in Mitigation Measure TCR – 1, below. The remainder of the telephone calls went unanswered. It was concluded that the project area intersects a portion of an archaeological site, a historic-era segment of rail line that once connected the two northern branches of the Southern Pacific Railroad; the rail line ran from San Francisco to Los Angeles. The segment of the rail line intersecting the project area is located in the northeast portion of the project area adjacent to Tennis Drive. This segment was recorded on July 19, 2000 by Mike Avina, who documented the site as a historic-era railroad segment consisting of fifty feet of Southern Pacific’s railroad system within the city of South San Francisco and recommended the resource as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the or the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) due to a lack of historic integrity resulting from modern development. During the current survey for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center project, it was noted that this segment had been completely removed. 195 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 68 a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a-i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The proposed project would not cause substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or in another local register. According to the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File while project site vicinity was once was documented as a historic-era railroad segment consisting of fifty feet of Southern Pacific’s railroad system within the city of South San Francisco, was determined ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the or the CRHR due to a lack of historic integrity resulting from modern development. This segment was subsequently completely removed. There are no other Native American tribal heritage sites recorded within the proposed project site or vicinity. After notification for formal consultation, the City received one request for consultation from the Indian Canyon Band Mutsun Band of Costanoan Indians. Given the negative results of the NAHC Sacred Lands File Search and the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Cultural Resources report (June 2023), and the existing disturbed environment of the Project site, it was concluded that the proposed Project would have a less- than-significant impact on tribal cultural resources with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, which would be implemented in the event that unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources (or TCRs) are exposed during project construction. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: The following measures shall be implemented prior to project implementation and in the event that unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources or TCRs are exposed during project construction: a. All construction staff must receive worker environment awareness training (WEAP) that identifies the identification and proper treatment of tribal cultural resources. In the event that unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources are exposed during disturbance activities, work within 15 meters (50 feet) of the find (Find Site) must stop and the California Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to identify a local Native American tribal member to provide monitoring inspection of any further construction work at the Find Site. Work may not resume at the Find Site until a tribal member is present to provide monitoring inspection. a-ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than Significant with Mitigation. The City of South San Francisco has considered the significance of potential tribal cultural resources on the project site and vicinity to Native American Tribes. Based on the reasons that results of the NAHC Sacred Lands Files Search were negative and with implementation 196 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 69 of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, as summarized above, impacts on tribal resources would be less than significant with mitigation. XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project: (a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ (e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Evaluation a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? WATER Less than Significant. Water for project construction and operation is supplied by the California Water Service, South San Francisco Division (CalWater), and the majority of their supply (80 percent) is purchased from San Francisco Regional Water System (SF RWS). The remaining water is drawn from local groundwater wells. CalWater serves 63,702 people in an 11.2-square-mile area, which has an average demand of 5.88 million gallons per day (mgd) (BAWSCA 2023). CalWater has an Individual Supply Guarantee of 35.68 mgd, or approximately 39,993 acre-feet per year, which is shared among its Bear Gulch, Mid-Peninsula, and South San Francisco Districts, from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). In addition to the water from the SFPUC, CalWater obtains a maximum of approximately 1.37 mgd or 1,534 acre-feet per year, from local sources in the Westside Groundwater Basin during a non-drought year. The Westside Groundwater Basin is categorized by the DWR as a very low priority basin and is actively managed to prevent significant overdraft (CalWater 2021). Between 197 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 70 2016 and 2020, CalWater supplied an average of 6,837 acre-feet per year of potable water (CalWater 2021). Construction activities would require a minimal amount of water for dust control and cement mixing. Water would be delivered to the project site by water truck. Since the project would replace one existing pool with two new pools, water use at the aquatic center would approximately double and the total volume of both pools would be approximately 450,425 gallons or 1.38 acre-feet, less than 0.02 percent of an average year water demand. Project operation would use water for backwashing the pool filters. The filters are backwashed approximately once every 2 weeks and use approximately 9,290 gallons of water with each event. Tanks are backwashed one at a time. Each tank would use approximately 241,540 gallons or 0.74 AF in a year, which is approximately 0.01 percent Therefore, the project would not result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, and this impact would be less than significant. WASTEWATER Less than Significant. Wastewater treatment is provided by South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant (SSWQCP), which is located along Colma Creek near San Francisco Bay. It receives an average dry weather flow of approximately 9 mgd and has capacity to treat up to 13 mgd in average dry weather flow. Peak wet weather flows can exceed 60 mgd (City of South San Francisco 2023k). The plant last experienced flows that exceeded maximum peak wet weather capacity on December 31, 2022 (City of South San Francisco 2023l). Construction of the project would produce minimal wastewater from construction crew use of portable toilets. The project would add new restroom and shower facilities as well as two pools in the new aquatic center, and demolish pool, restroom, and shower facilities associated with the existing pool building. Since the new aquatic center includes two pools and additional restroom and shower facilities, it is likely to serve more residents and therefore create more wastewater from restroom and shower use. Filters would be backwashed approximately once every 2 weeks, creating approximately 9,290 gallons of wastewater each time, which is approximately 0.1 percent of the dry weather flow capacity. Therefore, the additional volume of wastewater produced from the pool facility would be minimal. Operation of the project would produce a minimal permanent change in wastewater production, and the project would not result in the relocation or construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, therefore this impact would be less than significant. STORMWATER Less than Significant. The project would include a total of approximately 17,215 square feet of new impervious surface area, which would drain to new LID stormwater treatment and retention facilities on- site. Overflow would drain to the existing storm drain in W. Orange Avenue and eventually to Colma Creek. The project would include drainage improvements that meet the requirements of the SMCWPPP to prevent sediment-laden runoff to Colma Creek. Therefore, project operation would not create a need for new stormwater facilities, and this impact would be less than significant. The Applicant would be required to implement a SWPPP under the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit6 and the SMCWPPP during project construction (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 2022). The SWPPP must include site-specific BMPs that are designed to prevent runoff from construction areas to 6 San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 2015. Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit. Order No. R2-2015-0049. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008. Available at: https://www.cleanwaterprogram.org/images/uploads/R2- 2015-0049.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2021. 198 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 71 reduce potential impacts to surface water quality during project construction. The plan would also include design elements and BMPs for construction areas, such as fueling and equipment washing areas, and trash and hazardous material storage areas. Therefore, impacts related to stormwater runoff during construction would be less than significant. GAS AND ELECTRICITY Less than Significant. Electric power services are provided by Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) and Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). The City automatically enrolled all residents and businesses in PCE in 2016 in an effort to reduce GHG emissions and combat global warming, and offers the option to remain using PG&E as an energy provider. PCE purchases electricity directly from renewable energy sources, and PG&E delivers the electricity to homes and businesses using its existing transmission and distribution lines (City of South San Francisco 2023f). PG&E additionally provides the City’s natural gas. The project would have new electrical demands associated with the new and enlarged aquatic center. The project would be all-electric and would include rooftop solar panels to help supply electricity. The project would result in either a small increase or a net decrease in existing electricity use because of the solar panels; therefore, this impact would be less than significant. The project would be all electric and would remove existing gas infrastructure; therefore, no impact related to natural gas use would occur. TELECOMMUNICATIONS Less than Significant. The project would replace the existing aquatic center and extend new telecommunications infrastructure to the facility; however, it would not appreciably change existing telecommunications use. Therefore, no impact related to telecommunications infrastructure would occur. The existing park facilities are served by all public utilities. The new aquatic center would replace the existing pool and would tie into the same water, sewer, and storm drain lines through new laterals. The project would be all electric and would not include the use of natural gas. The project would also include solar panels to supply electricity. The project would tie into existing electrical and telecommunications facilities. The project would not require the construction or relocation of new or expanded water, wastewater, storm drain, electric power, or telecommunications facilities. This impact would be less than significant. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant. The aquatic center is served by CalWater, South San Francisco District. As discussed above, 80 percent of CalWater’s supply for their South San Francisco District is purchased from the San Francisco Regional Water System and originates in the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, and the remaining 20 percent is drawn from local groundwater wells. In 2019, the SWRCB adopted amendments to the Bay Delta Water Quality Control Plan that increased flows in the Tuolumne River in order to protect Bay-Delta water quality (SWRCB 2019). As a result, the SFPUC, which oversees the San Francisco Regional Water System, needs to find additional water to meet projected demand, particularly in drought years. The SFPUC is currently working on a Voluntary Settlement Agreement with the state, as well as pursuing an Alternative Supply Program with a number of alternative sources of supply, both within San Francisco and in partnership with other agencies, that could provide additional water to meet current and future obligations. In the meantime, supply and demand projections are based on the currently adopted amendment (SFPUC 2023). 199 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 72 As required by the DWR, CalWater has analyzed the long-term reliability and vulnerability of its water supplies and developed a combination of supply alternatives and conservation planning efforts to meet the water supply needs of its customers in the South San Francisco District. CalWater has developed water supply estimates for normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios based on the existing Bay Delta Water Quality Control Plan. Table 6 shows the projected water balance for a normal dry year through 2045. Table 7 shows the water balance for the first 5 years of a multiple dry year sequence under the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (CalWater 2021). As shown in Table 6, CalWater has adequate water supplies to meet a normal year demand. Table 6. Water Supply and Demand Estimates for Normal Water Years In Acre Feet (DWR Table 7- 2) Drought Year Supply/Demand Totals* 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 First Year Supply Totals 7,543 7,483 7,635 8,000 8,423 Demand Totals2 7,543 7,483 7,635 8,000 8,423 Difference 0 0 0 0 0 * All numbers are in million gallons per year. Source: CalWater (2021), Table 7-3. Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison (DWR Table 7-2). As shown in Table 7, CalWater’s multiple dry year supplies are not adequate to meet projected multiple dry year demands. Significant supply shortfalls, ranging from 29 to 38 percent in the first year of the 5- year dry period to 36 to 45 percent in the fifth year of the 5-year dry period, are projected. The water supply projections presented above likely represent a worst-case scenario in which the Bay-Delta Plan Amendment is implemented without the SFPUC and the SWRCB reaching a Voluntary Agreement and does not account for implementation of SFPUC’s Alternative Water Supply Program. Table 7. CalWater Water Supply and Demand Estimates for Multiple Dry Years (DWR Table 7-4) Drought Year Supply/Demand Totals* 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 First Year Supply Totals 5,678 5,636 5,739 5,917 5,534 Demand Totals 8,009 7,943 8,104 8,429 8,940 Difference -2,331 -2,307 -2,365 -2,574 -3,406 Second Year Supply Totals 5,095 5,059 5,082 5,291 5,534 Demand Totals 8,009 7,943 8,104 8,429 8,940 Difference -2,914 -2,884 -3,022 -3,138 -3,406 Third Year Supply Totals 5,095 5,059 5,082 5,291 5,534 Demand Totals 8,009 7,943 8,104 8,429 8,940 Difference -2,914 -2,884 -3,022 -3,138 -3,406 Fourth Year Supply Totals 5,095 5,059 5,082 4,874 4,941 Demand Totals 8,009 7,943 8,104 8,429 8,940 Difference -2,914 -2,884 -3,022 -3,555 -3,999 Fifth Year Supply Totals 5,095 5,059 5,082 4,874 4,941 Demand Totals 8,009 7,943 8,104 8,429 8,940 Difference -2,914 -2,884 -3,022 -3,555 -3,999 * All numbers are in acre-feet per year. Source: CalWater (2021), Table 7-5. Multiple Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison (DWR Table 7-4). 200 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 73 The new pool complex with two pools will approximately double the existing water use. The outdoor pool would have a capacity of approximately 277,161 gallons and the indoor pool capacity would be approximately 173,264 gallons (see Design Plans, pp. 161 and 167, Appendix A). The total capacity would be 450,425 gallons or 1.38 acre-feet. This is less than 0.02 percent of total water demand in an average year. Project operation would use water for backwashing the pool filters. The filters are backwashed approximately once every 2 weeks and use approximately 9,290 gallons of water with each event. Tanks are backwashed one at a time. Each tank would use approximately 241,540 gallons or 0.74 AF in a year, which is less than 0.001 percent of the average demand and supply of a normal water year (Table 6). Therefore, the new pool complex would represent a minor increase in water demand and this impact would be less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant. As discussed under Section 3.XVIII(a), SSWQCP receives average dry weather flow of approximately 9 mgd and has a wastewater treatment plant capacity of up to 13 mgd in average dry weather flow (City of South San Francisco 2023l). The project would result in an increase in existing pool, restroom, and shower uses at the Orange Pool Aquatic Center that would result in a relatively minor increase in wastewater production. However, the project would not result in an increase in residences or employment that would bring more people to the area, and wastewater production increases related to pool use would be small; therefore, impacts related to increased wastewater production would be less than significant. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than Significant. Solid waste pickup is provided to the project area and City by South San Francisco Scavenger Company, which provides pickup of residential and commercial garbage, recyclable material, organic waste, and food waste, and diverts construction and demolition debris, wood waste, plastics, commercial food waste and other materials for recycling (South San Francisco Scavenger Company 2023a). Scavenger also operates a state-of-the-art transfer station and materials recovery facility (South San Francisco Scavenger Company 2023b) as well as an anaerobic digestor facility that processes organic waste to compressed renewable natural gas for use in the company’s collection trucks (South San Francisco Scavenger Company 2018). Solid waste is transported to the Corinda Los Trancos Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill for recycling, composting, and disposal (Everything South City 2021). The landfill is permitted to receive 3,598 tons of waste per day and has an anticipated closure date of 2034 (CalRecycle 2017).7 In the second quarter of 2019, the landfill received an average of 160,253 tons of solid waste (approximately 1,780 tons per day, or 49 percent of its permitted throughput). The project would be required to adhere to the City’s Municipal Code Section 15.60.030, Diversion Requirements, which requires contractors to divert construction and demolition debris in a manner that complies with the California Green Building Standards Code. In particular, the project must submit and follow a Waste Management Plan that includes the following: 7 Asphalt or concrete construction debris is approximately 2,400 pounds per cubic yard. Dry earth construction debris is approximately 2,100 pounds per cubic yard. Reference: California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2018. Solid Waste Cleanup Program Weights and Volumes for Project Estimates. Available at: https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/cdi/tools/calculations. Accessed October 21, 2021. 201 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 74 • Deconstruct and salvage all or part of the structure, as practicable; • Direct 100 percent of inert solids to reuse and recycling facilities; and • Either: o Take all mixed construction and demolition debris to mixed construction and demolition debris recycling facilities approved by the City and take all sorted or crushed construction and demolition debris to approved facilities, or o Source separate noninert materials such as cardboard and paper, wood, metals, green waste, new gypsum wallboard, tile, porcelain fixtures, and other easily recycled materials, and direct them to recycling facilities approved by the City and take the remainder to a facility for disposal. In this option, calculations must be provided to show that the minimum amount of debris as specified by Section 4.408 of Chapter 4 of CALGreen has been diverted. (Ord. 1532 § 1, 2017) The landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 45 million cubic yards and is expected to operate until 2034 (CalRecycle 2023). The project would divert construction and demolition debris as required, and the landfill would have adequate capacity to receive the remainder during the construction phase of the project because the construction phase of the project would be temporary and would generate a limited amount of solid waste. Development of the required Waste Management Plan would ensure this impact is less than significant. Operation of the project would not change appreciably from operation of the existing aquatic center; therefore, the project would not generate waste in excess of state or local standards or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant. The project would adhere to all federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Applicant would require the contractor to adhere to the City’s Waste Management Plan for disposal of construction debris, including recycling at least 75 percent of clean asphalt and concrete. During operation, the new aquatic center would install recycling and composting waste containers to promote waste diversion from landfills, and water bottle refill stations to promote reusable water bottles. Therefore, the project would meet all City requirements for recycling during operation, and this impact would be less than significant. XIX. Wildfire Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: (a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 202 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 75 Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Evaluation a) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project is located in proximity to wildland areas and would pose a potential fire hazard, or affect an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan in the event of a fire. CalFire maps Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs) in State Responsibility Areas (SRAs), as well as Very High FHSZs in Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs). The project site is in an LRA and is under the jurisdiction of the South San Francisco Fire Department. There are no Very High FHSZs mapped in South San Francisco (CalFire 2008). San Bruno Mountain, 0.8 mile north of the project site, is in a Moderate FHSZ in an SRA (CalFire 2022). The project would replace an existing public pool and aquatic center with a new pool complex. It would not draw additional people to an area subject to wildland fires. Therefore, no impact would occur and the project would not result in any impact an emergency response or evacuation plan. Project construction would include street and/or lane closures on W. Orange Avenue and Tennis Drive. However, the project would obtain an encroachment permit for road or lane closures and would abide by all City policies including development of a Traffic Control Plan. Therefore, the project would not interfere with an adopted emergency response or evacuation response plan and no impact would occur. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No Impact. The project is not located in or near SRAs or lands classified as Very High FHSZs. The project would replace an existing aquatic center in a public park and would not include elements that would exacerbate wildfire risks. No impact would occur. 203 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 76 c) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. The project is not located in or near SRAs or lands classified as Very High FHSZs. The project would replace an existing aquatic center in a public park and would not extend facilities that would exacerbate wildfire risks. No impact would occur. d) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The project is not located in or near SRAs or lands classified as Very High FHSZs. The project would replace an existing aquatic center in a public park and would not expose people or structures to significant post-fire risks. No impact would occur. XX. Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ (c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ 204 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 77 Environmental Evaluation a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project would replace an existing aquatic center and parking lot and reconfigure existing soccer fields within Orange Memorial Park. The City of South San Francisco is located within the South Bay of San Mateo County and is highly urbanized. Accordingly, the potential for candidate, sensitive, or special status species or habitats is low within the City limits. As described in Section IV, Biological Resources, Section V, Cultural Resources, and the preceding analyses, no significant unmitigable impacts to the environment would result. The implementation of MM BIO-1, MM-BIO-2, MM CUL-1, MM-CUL-2, MM-GEO-1, MM-NO-1, MM-HAZ-1, MM-HAZ-2 and MM TCR-1 would minimize impacts to nesting birds, and undiscovered cultural, archeological and paleontological resources, geology and soils impacts related to ground failure , construction noise, hazards and hazardous materials related to soil contaminants (arsenic) and building materials (lead paint), and tribal cultural resources to less-than-significant levels. The project does not include significant fish or wildlife habitat or known cultural resources. Based on these findings, the City of South San Francisco hereby finds that impacts related to degradation of the environment, biological resources, and cultural resources would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant with Mitigation. Cumulative environmental impacts are multiple individual impacts that, when considered together would be considerable, or compound other environmental impacts. Individual impacts would potentially result from a single project or multiple separate projects that would potentially occur at the same place and point in time or at different locations and over extended periods of time. The proposed project would not result in individually limited or contribute to cumulatively considerable significant impacts. As discussed in Sections I through XX, all short-term environmental issues would result in either no impacts, less than significant impacts, or less than significant impacts with the incorporation of mitigation with the implementation of the project. Construction of the proposed project could result in some short-term temporary impacts such air quality impacts from dust and engine exhaust, , impacts to nesting birds and, previously undiscovered cultural and paleontological resources, impacts related to seismic-related ground failure, construction noise, hazards related to soil contaminants (arsenic) and building materials (lead paint) and tribal cultural resources, but those would be temporary and/or less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. In summary, the Project’s contribution to potential cumulative impacts related to these other issues would be less than cumulatively considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant with Mitigation. Based on the nature and scope of the project and the analysis of the project’s impacts, as summarized in Sections I through XX, no environmental effects have been 205 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 78 identified in this IS/MND that would cause substantial adverse effects, either directly or indirectly, on human beings. There would be a variety of other potential effects during construction including: • Impacts to nesting birds and federally protected waters associated with construction activities and minor tree removal (discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources) • Adverse impacts to prehistoric cultural resources and potential unknown human remains (discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources); • Earthwork and construction-related impacts due to the potential for liquefaction (discussed in Section VII, Geology and Soils • Construction noise-related impacts (discussed in Section XIII, Noise) • Impacts related to disposal of hazardous materials (discussed in Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials); and • Adverse impacts from construction activities to Tribal Cultural Resources (discussed in Section XVII, Tribal Cultural Resources). In addition, the project could result in exposure of nearby single-family and multi-family residences to increases in ambient noise levels and nuisances associated with temporary construction-related noise (discussed in Section XIII, Noise), which would be considered less than significant with implementation of and compliance with local noise ordinances. Most of these impacts would be temporary and intermittent, and all of these impacts would be less than significant based on compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and established impact thresholds, as well as the implementation of mitigation measures. And while the proposed project could involve the handling of hazardous materials in a manner that poses, unusual risks, and any hazardous impacts associated with exposure of construction workers to potential harmful contaminants demolition debris, impacts would be mitigated through the implementation of mitigation measures. The proposed would not result in long-term air quality or traffic hazards. Based on the analysis in this IS/MND, the City of South San Francisco finds that direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 206 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 79 4 REFERENCES Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2023. Making Sense of the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale (MMI) – A Measure of Shaking. Available at: https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/making_sense_of_the_modified_mercalli_intensity_scale.p df. Accessed June 5, 2023. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Final 2017 Clean Air Plan. Spare the Air-Cool the Climate. Available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and- research/plans/2017-clean-air-plan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-cap-vol-1-pdf.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2023. ———. 2022. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Chapter 3. CEQA Thresholds. Available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental- quality-act-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines. Accessed July 18, 2023. Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA). 2023. California Water Service – South San Francisco District. Available at: https://bawsca.org/members/profiles/cws-san-francisco. Accessed June 14, 2023. CAL FIRE. 2008. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area. San Mateo County. Available at CAL FIRE 2022. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area Map Viewer. Available at https://calfire- forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4466cf1d2b9947bea1d4269997e86 553. Accessed June 12, 2023. ———. 2022. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area Map Viewer. Available at https://calfire- forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4466cf1d2b9947bea1d4269997e86 553. Accessed June 12, 2023. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2017. SWIS Facility Detail. Corinda Los Trancos (Ox Mtn) (41-AA-0002). Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/1561?siteID=3223. Accessed June 29, 2023. California Department of Toxics Substances Control (DTSC). 2020. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note Number 3, DTSC-Modified Screening Levels (DTSC-SLs). Available at: https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2022/02/HHRA-Note-3-June2020-Revised- May2022A.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2023. ———. 2023a. EnviroStor. Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map. Accessed June 7, 2023. ———. 2023b. EnviroStor. Mantegani Site (70000073). Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=70000073. Accessed June 7, 2023. California Department of Transportation. 2023. Scenic Highways. Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv- i-scenic-highways. Accessed June 8, 2023. 207 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 80 California Geological Survey. 2021. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/eqzapp/app/. Accessed June 5, 2023. California Water Service (CalWater). 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. South San Francisco District. Available at: https://www.calwater.com/docs/uwmp2020/SSF_2020_UWMP_FINAL.pdf Accessed June 12, 2023. City/County Associations of Governments (C/CAG) of San Mateo County. 2012. Comprehensive Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco international Airport. Available at: https://ccag.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Consolidated_CCAG_ALUCP_November- 20121.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2023. City of South San Francisco. 2010. City of South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.300.010, Performance Standards. Available at: http://ci-ssf- ca.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=309&meta_id=23192. Accessed July 20, 2023. ———. 2022a. City of South San Francisco 2040 General Plan. Shape SSF. Available at: https://shapessf.com/wp- content/uploads/2022/11/SSFGPU_PDFPlan_FinalPlan_Resolution_11082022.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2023. ———. 2022b. City of South San Francisco Climate Action Plan. Available at: https://shapessf.com/wp- content/uploads/2022/03/SSFCAP_PublicDraft2022_02_Small.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2023. ———. 2023a. Orange Memorial Park Master Plan. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/home/showpublisheddocument/29241/638137808336400000. Accessed June 7, 2023. ———. 2023b. SSF Zoning Search App. Available at: https://zoning.ssf.net/. Accessed June 5, 2023. ———. 2023c. SSF New Aquatic Center at Orange Memorial Park. FAQS. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/parks-recreation/recreation-division/aquatics/new-aquatic- center-at-orange-memorial-park. Accessed June 7, 2023. City of South San Francisco Parks and Recreation. 2023a. Child Care. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/parks-recreation/recreation-division/child-care. Accessed August 17, 2023. City of South San Francisco Parks and Recreation. 2023b. Summer Camp 2023. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/home/showpublisheddocument/29129/638125653359470000. Accessed August 17, 2023. ———. 2023d. Community Choice Energy. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/city- manager/sustainability/community-choice-energy. Accessed July 20, 2023. ———. 2023e. Municipal Code. Chapter 13.30 Tree Preservation. Available at: https://library.qcode.us/lib/south_san_francisco_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_13- chapter_13_30. Accessed June 5, 2023. 208 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 81 ———. 2023f. Municipal Code. Title 20. Zoning. Available at: https://library.qcode.us/lib/south_san_francisco_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_20-division_i- chapter_20_020-20_020_001. Accessed June 5, 2023. ———. 2023g. Municipal Code. Chapter 8.32. Noise Regulations. Available at: https://library.qcode.us/lib/south_san_francisco_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_8- chapter_8_32. Accessed July 20, 2023. ———. 2023h. Fire Stations. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/fire/fire-stations. Accessed June 13, 2023. ———. 2023i. Police Stations. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/police. Accessed June 13, 2023. ———. 2023j. Free South City Shuttle. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/services/free-south-city- shuttle/shuttle-map. Accessed August 17, 2023. ———. 2023k. Water Quality Control Plant. Treatment Process. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/public-works/water-quality-control-plant/treatment-process. Accessed June 14, 2023. ———. 2023l. Water Quality Control Plant. Public Notification. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/public-works/water-quality-control-plant/public-notification. Accessed June 14, 2023. City of South San Francisco, Engineering Department. 2019. City of South San Francisco Orange Memorial Park Water Capture Project. Public Review Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. Prepared by Wood Environmental & Infrastructure Solutions. City of South San Francisco, Parks Division. 2023a. Sign Hill webpage. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/parks-recreation/parks-division/sign-hill. Accessed June 8, 2023. ———. 2023b. Tree Preservation Ordinance webpage. Available at: https://www.ssf.net/departments/parks-recreation/parks-division/trees. Accessed June 9, 2023. County of San Mateo. 2023. San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program. Construction Best Practices Webpage. Available at: https://www.flowstobay.org/construction. Accessed June 12, 2023. Department of Conservation. 2018. California Important Farmland Finder. San Mateo County. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/. Accessed June 5, 2023. Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2006. Bulletin 118 – Westside Groundwater Basin. Available at: https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/Programs/Groundwater- Management/Bulletin-118/Files/2003-Basin-Descriptions/2_035_Westside.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2023. Everything South City. 2021. Must Read Tips from our South City San Francisco Scavenger Company. Available at: https://everythingsouthcity.com/2021/06/must-read-tips-from-our-south-san- francisco-scavenger-company/. Accessed June 29, 2023. 209 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2023. National Flood Hazard Layer. Map 06081C0043F. Available at: https://hazards- fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9c d>. Accessed June 12, 2023. FlowstoBay.org. 2023. Stormwater Quality Control Requirements, Information for Developers, Builders and Project Applicants. Available at: https://www.flowstobay.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/04/SMCWPPP-MRP-3.0-C.3-Flyer_final.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2023. Rizzoli, Linda. Senior Project Manager. Swinerton Management & Consulting. July 7, 2023. Email communication to Julie Barlow, Principal Planning Team Lead, SWCA Environmental Consultants. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). 2022. Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. Order No. R2-2022-0018. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008. May 11. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/board_decisions/adopted_orders/2022/R2- 2022-0018.pdf> Accessed June 12, 2023. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. 2023. Alternative Water Supplies. Available at: https://sfpuc.org/programs/future-water-supply-planning/alternative-water-supplies. Accessed June 29, 2023. San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2023. San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. March 7. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/basin_planning.html. Accessed June 12, 2023. San Mateo County. 2023. Open San Mateo County. Williamson Act Parcels. Available at: https://data.smcgov.org/Housing-Development/Williamson-Act-Parcels/sq6e-7j5j. Accessed June 5, 2023. South San Francisco Scavenger Company. 2018. Facilitating Food Waste Digestion. Available at: https://www.biocycle.net/facilitating-food-waste-digestion/. Published in BioCycle, May 2018. Accessed June 29, 2023. ———. 2023a. About Us. Available at: https://ssfscavenger.com/about-us/. Accessed June 29, 2023. ———. 2023b. History. Available at: https://ssfscavenger.com/about-us/history/. Accessed June 29, 2023. South San Francisco Unified School District. 2022. Long Range Facilities Master Plan. Available at: https://4.files.edl.io/5a24/08/25/22/194515-5cce5154-3bcb-4222-9cc6-9fff606d1143.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2023. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2019. Bay-Delta Plan Update: Amendments and Substitute Environmental Document (SED) for the Lower San Joaquin River and Southern Delta. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/bay_delta/bay_delta_plan/w ater_quality_control_planning/2018_sed/. Accessed June 29, 2023. 210 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 83 ———. 2020. Environmental Screening Levels Webpage. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/programs/esl.html. Accessed June 7, 2023. ———. 2023a. GeoTracker. Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/. Accessed June 7, 2023. ———. 2023b. GeoTracker. Parcels northwest of Orange Park (T10000002366). Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T10000002366. Accessed June 7, 2023. Stinson, M.C, M.W. Manson, and J.L. Plappert. 1982. Aggregate Resource Sectors. South San Francisco Bay P-C Region. Map 2-65. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc> Accessed June 13, 2023. Troung, Kim-Van, Principal, els Architecture+urban design. 2023. Email communication with Linda Rizzoli Swinerton Management & Consulting. August 25, 2023. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 2006. FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook. Final Report. August 2006. ———. 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Available at: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise- and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2023. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2019. M6.9 October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/science/m69-october-17-1989-loma-prieta- earthquake. Accessed June 5, 2023. ———. 2023. The Great San Francisco Earthquake. Available at: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/events/1906calif/18april/. Accessed June 5, 2023. 211 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 This page intentionally left blank. 212 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER PROJECT (November 2023) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14), which state: Section 15097. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting (a)… In order to ensure that the mitigation measures and project revisions identified in the EIR or negative declaration are implemented, the public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. A public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity which accepts the delegation; however, until mitigation measures have been completed the lead agency remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occurs in accordance with the program. (c) The public agency may choose whether its program will monitor mitigation, report on mitigation, or both. “Reporting” generally consists of a written compliance review that is presented to the decision-making body or authorized staff person. A report may be required at various stages during project implementation or upon completion of the mitigation measures. "Monitoring" is generally an ongoing or periodic process of project oversight. There is often no clear distinction between monitoring and reporting and the program best suited to ensuring compliance in any given instance will usually involve elements of both. The choice of program may be guided by the following: (1) Reporting is suited to projects which have readily measurable or quantitative mitigation measures or which already involve regular review. For example, a report may be required upon issuance of final occupancy to a project whose mitigation measures were confirmed by building inspection. (2) Monitoring is suited to projects with complex mitigation measures, such as wetlands restoration or archeological protection, which may exceed the expertise of the local agency to oversee, are expected to be implemented over a period of time, or require careful implementation to assure compliance. (3) Reporting and monitoring are suited to all but the most simple projects. Monitoring ensures that project compliance is checked on a regular basis during and, if necessary after, implementation. Reporting ensures that the approving agency is informed of compliance with mitigation requirements. The MMRP table below lists the proposed mitigation measures identified in the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). The table also describes the timing for mitigation measure implementation (e.g.., when the measure shall be implemented) and the parties—such as the Construction Contractor and/or City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative—that are responsible for ensuring implementation of all aspects of each measure. 213 Additionally, the MMRP table below provides comments that highlight measure contents and responsibilities. 214 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date Biological Resources BIO-1 Minimize impacts to stormwater drainages and Colma Creek: a.All spoils, such as dirt, excavated material, debris, and construction-related materials, generated during project activities shall be placed where they cannot enter any drainage ditch or culvert inlet. Spoils shall be covered or secured to prevent sediment from escaping. Once the spoil pile is no longer active, it shall be removed from the work area and disposed of lawfully at an appropriate facility. b.All exposed soils in the work area resulting from project activities shall be stabilized immediately following the completion of work to prevent erosion. Erosion and sediment control BMPs, such as silt fences, straw hay bales, gravel or rock-lined drainages, water check bars, and broadcast straw, can be used. BMPs shall be made of certified weed-free materials. Straw wattles, if used, shall be made of biodegradable fabric (e.g., burlap) and free of monofilament netting. At no time shall silt-laden runoff be allowed to enter any drainages or other sensitive areas. c.All fueling and maintenance of vehicles and other equipment and staging areas shall occur at least 100 feet from any drainages and other water features. Prior to the onset of work, the construction contractor shall prepare a plan to be approved by the City before construction begins to allow a prompt and effective response to any accidental spills. All workers shall be informed of the importance of preventing spills, and of the appropriate measures to take should a spill occur. d.Before completion of the project, all exposed or disturbed surfaces shall be permanently protected from erosion with reseeding and landscaping. e.All exposed surfaces shall be wetted periodically to prevent significant dust. f.All stockpiled soil shall be covered during periods of rain. Colma Creek shall be protected from project- generated spoils. Ensure that all exposed soils associated with the project are stabilized immediately following construction completion. Appropriate BMPs shall be deployed prior to and during construction to prevent erosion and/or runoff into potentially jurisdictional drainages. Ensure fueling and maintenance of vehicles and other equipment and staging areas do not occur within 100 feet of drainages, and that such drainages are not contaminated during refueling, maintenance, or staging of materials. Prior to beginning project work, the Contractor shall develop a Spill Response Plan to ensure prompt and effective response to accidental spills. The plan must be submitted to the City of South San Francisco before construction commences, and must be kept onsite at all times during construction. Adequate spill clean- up supplies must be kept on site and at-the- ready during construction. The plan will be included in the environmental awareness training. Reduce potential for dust by wetting exposed surfaces periodically. Reduce potential for sediment loss by covering stockpiled soils during periods of rain. Once the project is complete, ensure that all exposed and/or disturbed surfaces are protected from soil erosion with reseeding and landscaping. General Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / during construction Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 1 of 7 215 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date BIO-2 Minimize impacts to nesting birds, as required by the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act: a.If project activities, including, but not limited to, tree removal or pruning, grubbing and grading, are conducted during nesting bird season (February 15 to September 15), preconstruction nest surveys shall be conducted in and near the project (within 500 feet for large raptors and 300 feet for all other birds) by a qualified biologist within 7 days of the start of construction. If nesting birds are identified during the preconstruction survey, then the project shall be modified (i.e., a no-work exclusion buffer of appropriate size [to be determined by the qualified project biologist] shall be erected around active nests) and/or delayed as necessary to avoid impacts to the identified nests, eggs, and/or young. Disturbing active nests must be avoided until young birds have fledged. Project activities, including grubbing and grading, should be conducted outside of nesting bird season (February 15 through September 15). If work outside of nesting bird season is not feasible, then ensure a qualified biologist conducts preconstruction nesting bird surveys prior to commencing work. If nesting birds or raptors are observed on site, ensure an appropriately-sized no-work buffer is established around the nest and/or the project is modified and/or delayed as necessary in coordination with the project biologist. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / during construction Cultural Resources CUL-1 Avoid impacts to unknown cultural resources: a.In the event that unanticipated cultural resources are exposed during disturbance activities, work within 15 meters (50 feet) of the find must stop and an SOI-qualified archaeologist (SWCA Senior Project Manager Christina Alonso [925-399-9220]) must be notified immediately. Work may not resume until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Disturbance activities may continue in other areas. If the discovery proves significant, additional work such as archaeological testing, data recovery, or consultation with stakeholders may be warranted. Prior to commencing work, ensure that construction personnel are trained and informed of how to identify and avoid historical and archaeological resources in the event that they are exposed during construction. Such training may be included in the environmental awareness training prepared for the project per TCR-1. If archaeological or historical resources are discovered during construction, the Contractor shall ensure that work is immediately stopped in the vicinity of the find, and the City of South San Francisco is immediately notified. Discovered resources must be left in place as they were found: do not touch, collect, or otherwise disturb found resources. Work shall not resume in the vicinity of any discovered resources until the resources are fully evaluated by the archaeologist, and the City of South San Francisco approves the continuation of work in the vicinity of the find. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During construction Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 2 of 7 216 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date Ensure any additional cultural work such as testing or data recovery is implemented as required. CUL-2 Avoid impacts to unknown human remains: The discovery of human remains during the course of the project is a possibility. If human remains are encountered, then the procedures outlined by the NAHC, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and PRC Section 5097.98, would be followed. If the monitor determines that a discovery includes human remains: a.All ground-disturbing work within the immediate vicinity (25 feet) of the find would halt. b.The archaeologist would contact the San Mateo County Coroner: San Mateo County Coroner 50 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402 Phone: (650) 312-5562 Web: https://www.smcgov.org/coroner c.As a courtesy, the County Coroner would also notify the NAHC: Native American Heritage Commission 915 Capitol Mall, Room 364 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: nahc@nahc.ca.gov The County Coroner would have 2 working days to examine the remains after being notified in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the San Mateo County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American and are not subject to the County Coroner’s authority, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the NAHC of the discovery. d.The NAHC would immediately designate and notify the Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD), who will have 48 hours after being granted access to the location of the remains to inspect them and provide recommendations for the treatment of them. If human remains are discovered during construction, the Monitor and/or Contractor shall ensure that work is immediately stopped in within 25 feet of the find, and the San Mateo County Coroner and City of South San Francisco is immediately notified. Discovered human remains must be left in place as they were found: do not touch, collect, or otherwise disturb found resources. Work shall not resume in the vicinity of any discovered remains until the remains are fully evaluated by the Coroner, and the City of South San Francisco approves the continuation of work in the vicinity of the find. The Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission if the remains are determined to be Native American. Ensure any additional treatment, as recommended by the Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD), is implemented as required. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative During construction Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 3 of 7 217 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date Geology and Soils GEO-1 Avoid and/or reduce impacts from unstable soils: a. All earthwork and construction activities shall be monitored by a licensed engineer or professional geologist. The purpose of the monitoring is to assess soil conditions and confirm the appropriate engineered support systems are incorporated into the project design and installed correctly. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, in addition to the requirements of the geotechnical report, would reduce impacts related to seismic hazards to less than significant. Review and confirm the appropriate engineered support systems are incorporated into the project design. Ensure a licensed engineer or professional geologist is onsite during all earthwork and construction activities. The licensed engineer or professional geologist shall confirm that appropriate engineered support systems are installed correctly. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During construction Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1 Develop and Implement a Demolition Debris Management and Disposal Plan: The County or its Contractor must develop and implement a demolition debris management and disposal plan for the non- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous materials that are to be removed from the project site per compliance with County waste diversion requirements in San Mateo County Code of Ordinances, Section 4.105.030 (100 percent of inert solids and at least 50 percent of the remaining construction and demolition debris tonnage). The plan must be designed to prevent releases of hazardous materials in quantities that could pose a risk to human health and the environment, as determined using appropriate BAAQMD, RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate agency screening thresholds. Develop a Demolition Debris Management and Disposal Plan prior to construction. Implement plan during construction. Ensure 100 percent of inert solids and at least 50 percent of the remaining construction and demolition debris tonnage are diverted from landfills. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During construction Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 4 of 7 218 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date HAZ-2 The construction contractor (as required by the contract specifications) shall develop a Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan (HMCP) that includes standard construction measures required by federal, state, and local policies for the handling of potential hazardous materials and removal of on-site debris. The HMCP shall include the implementation of a Waste Management Plan (WMP) for the management of all construction waste, and a Safety Management Plan (SMP) to minimize construction worker’s exposure to dust emissions and emissions that have the potential to contain hazardous concentrations of arsenic. At a minimum, this plan shall include the following: a. Soils on the project site should be tested for arsenic and organochlorine pesticides prior to grading and excavation. b. If contaminated soils or other hazardous materials are encountered during any soil moving operation during construction, the HMCP shall be implemented. c. Instruct workers on recognition and reporting of materials that may be hazardous. d. Minimize delays by continuing performance of the work in areas not affected by hazardous materials operations. e. Identify and contact subcontractors and licensed personnel qualified to undertake storage, removal, transportation, disposal, and other remedial work required by, and in accordance with, laws and regulations. f. Forward to engineer, copies of reports, permits, receipts, and other documentation related to remedial work. g. Notify such agencies as are required to be notified by laws and regulations within the time stipulated by such laws and regulations. h. File requests for adjustments to contract time and contract price due to the finding of hazardous materials in the work site in accordance with conditions of contract. Prior to construction, develop a Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan (HMCP), Waste Management Plan, and Safety Management Plan. Test soils for arsenic and organochlorine pesticides prior to grading and excavation. Instruct workers on how to recognize and report materials that may be hazardous Implement Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan if contaminated soils or other hazardous materials are encountered. Confirm subcontractors are licensed to perform storage, removal, transportation, disposal, and other remedial work. Confirm proper documentation and agency notification of any hazardous materials. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During Construction Noise Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 5 of 7 219 NOI-1 Reduce Construction Noise Impacts: a.Secure a valid City permit for construction noise levels that could potentially temporarily exceed 90 dB at the park’s property line in order to comply with the South San Francisco Noise Regulations. b.Construction equipment and haul trucks shall use the best available noise control techniques, including improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically attenuating barriers, curtains, and shields. c.Site stationary noise sources, such as air compressors and generators, as far from adjacent sensitive receptors as possible. These sources shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds or incorporate insulation barriers, shields, or other attenuating measures. d.If impact equipment and machinery are used such as jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills, they shall be hydraulically or electrically powered to avoid noise associated with air compressors or pneumatically powered tools. If the use of pneumatically powered tools is necessary, an exhaust muffler shall be installed on the air compressor. Such a muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to 10 dBA. Similarly, the installation of external jackets on the tools can reduce noise levels by 5 dBA. e.Material stockpiles and mobile equipment, staging, and parking areas shall be located as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (i.e. adjacent tot lot and summer camps in the Ferneke Building. f.Identify a liaison that represents the property owners located adjacent to the project site along Tennis Drive. This liaison shall be contacted with concerns regarding construction noise. The liaison’s contact information shall be clearly displayed at the construction location on posted signs informing the public of the construction hours and the liaison to contact in the event of a noise-related problem. g.Notify all adjacent landowners and occupants of the properties adjacent to the project site of the anticipated construction schedule at least 2 weeks prior to ground- disturbing activities. h.Hold a pre-construction meeting with the Contractor Superintendent, General Contractor, and City inspectors to confirm that all noise mitigation measures (including signage on construction hours, valid City exception permit, and liaison contact information) are completed. Contractor Superintendent, General Contractor, and City inspectors must attend a preconstruction meeting to confirm that all noise mitigation measures (including signage on construction hours, valid City exception permit, and liaison contact information) are completed Confirm valid City permit for construction noise levels. Keep City permit onsite at all times. Confirm that all equipment uses best available noise control techniques. Confirm stationary noise sources are as far as possible from sensitive receptors. Use only hydraulically or electrically powered impact equipment and machinery. Locate material stockpiles, mobile equipment, staging and parking areas as far as possible from noise-sensitive receptors. Identify liaison to contact in case of noise- related issues, and clearly post contact information and construction hours at construction site. Notify adjacent landowners 2 weeks prior to ground disturbing activities. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During construction Noise Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 6 of 7 220 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Final November_2023) Color Codes Measure Implemented Prior to Construction or Pending Approval Measure Implemented During Construction Measure Implemented Following Construction Completion Impact Applicant Proposed Measure (APM) or Mitigation Measure Comments Responsible Party Timing / Milestone Completion Date TCR-1 Avoid impacts to unknown Tribal Cultural Resources: The following measures shall be implemented prior to project implementation and in the event that unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources or TCRs are exposed during project construction: a.All construction staff must receive worker environment awareness training (WEAP) that identifies the identification and proper treatment of tribal cultural resources. In the event that unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources are exposed during disturbance activities, work within 15 meters (50 feet) of the find (Find Site) must stop and the California Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to identify a local Native American tribal member to provide monitoring inspection of any further construction work at the Find Site. Work may not resume at the Find Site until a tribal member is present to provide monitoring inspection Prior to the start of the project, all construction crew members shall attend an environmental awareness training presented by a qualified archeologist. A training brochure describing the identification and proper treatment of tribal cultural resources, key contacts, and potential consequences of impacts to cultural resources shall be distributed to the crew members during the training. Trainees shall sign an environmental training attendance sheet. A fact sheet conveying this information shall be prepared for distribution to the construction crew and anyone else who enters the project site. If unanticipated prehistoric cultural resources are exposed during construction, STOP WORK within 15 meters (50 feet) of the find and call the California Native American Heritage Commission. Work in other areas may continue. A Native American monitor will be identified. Do not resume work until a local Native American tribal monitor is present onsite. Construction Contractor / City of South San Francisco and/or City Representative Prior to / During construction Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center MMRP, November 2023 7 of 7 221 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:23-957 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3b. Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve a Design Review permit (DR23-0037)for the new Aquatic Center at Orange Memorial Park within the Parks and Recreation (P&R) Zoning District WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco (“Applicant”) has proposed the construction of a new aquatic center in a 6.5-acre site within in Orange Memorial Park, referred to as “Project Site,” in the City consisting of a new building with an indoor pool and an attached outdoor pool (“Project”); and WHEREAS,the proposed Project is located within the Parks and Recreation (P&R)General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks approval of a Design Review Permit (DR23-0037) for the Project; and WHEREAS,approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project”for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS,on behalf of the City,SWCA Environmental Consultants prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”)for the Project (ND23-0005)analyzing the potential environmental effects of the Project,which was submitted to the State Clearinghouse (SCH No.2023090168)and the San Mateo County Clerk and was circulated for a 30-day public review period,beginning on September 11,2023,and ending on October 9, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City received two comment letters on the IS/MND during the applicable comment period; and WHEREAS,the City determined that the comments identified during the comment period do not result in new significant impacts or mitigation measures, or changed impact conclusions; and WHEREAS,the City determined that responses to comments and corrections to the IS/MND do not require recirculation of the IS/MND or warrant the preparation of an environmental impact report under sections 15073.5 and 15074.1 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS,the IS/MND concluded that,although the Project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the IS/MND identifies measures that will be incorporated into the Project,which will either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significant effects of the Project; and City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™222 File #:23-957 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3b. WHEREAS,on November 2,2023,the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the environmental effects of the Project and proposed entitlements and take public testimony; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed and carefully considered the information in the Orange Memorial Park IS/MND and by separate resolution,recommended that the City Council certify the IS/MND; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission exercised its independent judgment and analysis,and considered all reports, recommendations, and testimony before making a determination on the Project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it,which includes without limitation,the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR;the South San Francisco Municipal Code;the Project applications;the Project Plans,as prepared by ELS Architecture,dated August 28,2023;the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,as prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants,dated September 8, 2023;all site plans,and all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed November 2,2023 meeting;and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e)and §21082.2),the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco,based on substantial evidence in the record, hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS A.General Findings 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2.The Exhibits attached to this Resolution,including Conditions of Project Approval (Exhibit A)and Project Plan Set (Exhibit B)are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution,as if set forth fully herein. 3.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner. 4.By a separate resolution,the Planning Commission,exercising its independent judgment and analysis, has found that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™223 File #:23-957 Agenda Date:11/2/2023 Version:1 Item #:3b. B.Design Review 1.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code because the Project has been designed as a high-quality recreation facility,which will provide a state-of-the-art aquatic center, and achieve a sustainable building and landscape design. 2.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed office / R&D development is consistent with the policies and design direction provided in the South San Francisco Park and Recreation Land Use designation by developing public recreation facilities within a public park. 3.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with the applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council in that the proposed Project is consistent with the P&R Zoning District development standards and the Citywide development standards,as evaluated in the Zoning Ordinance Compliance analysis for the Project. 4.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with other planning or zoning approval that the Project requires for the reasons stated above. 5.The Project is consistent with the applicable design review criteria in South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.480.006 (“Design Review Criteria”)because the Project has been evaluated by the Design Review Board on March 21,2023 and June 20,2023,and found to be consistent with each of the eight design review criteria included in the “Design Review Criteria” section of the Ordinance. SECTION 2 DETERMINATION NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the findings contained in this Resolution and recommends that the City Council approve the entitlements request for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center (P23-0029:DR23-0037)subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. * * * * * * * City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/26/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™224 Page 1 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P23-0029, DR23-0037 Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center (As recommended by City Staff on November 2, 2023) Introduction The term “applicant”, “developer”, “project owner” or “project sponsor” used hereinafter shall have the same meaning- the applicant for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center project or the property/project owner if different from applicant. GENERAL 1. The project shall be constructed and operated substantially as indicated on the plan set prepared by ELS Architecture, and approved by the City Council in association with P23- 0029 as amended by the conditions of approval. The final plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City’s Chief Planner. 2. The construction drawings shall comply with the City Council approved plans, as amended by the conditions of approval, including the plans ELS Architecture and Urban Design, August 28, 2023. 3. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for the construction of public improvements, the final design for all public improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and Chief Planner. 4. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for grading improvements, the applicant shall submit final grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and Chief Planner. 5. Any modification to the approved plans shall be subject to SSFMC Section 20.450.012 (“Modification”), whereby the Chief Planner may approve minor changes. All exterior design modifications, including any and all utilities, shall be presented to the Chief Planner for a determination. 6. Unless the use has commenced or related building permits have been issued within two (2) years of the date this permit is granted, this permit will automatically expire on that date, subject to any extensions provided under the Subdivision Map Act or other applicable law. A one-year permit extension may be granted in accordance with provisions of the SSFMC Chapter 20.450 (Common Procedures) 225 Page 2 7. The permit shall not be effective for any purpose until the property owner or a duly authorized representative files a signed acceptance form, prior to the issuance of a building permit, stating that the property owner is aware of, and accepts, all of the conditions of the permit. 8. The permit shall be subject to revocation if the project is not operated in compliance with the conditions of approval. 9. Neither the granting of this permit nor any conditions attached thereto shall authorize, require or permit anything contrary to, or in conflict with any ordinances specifically named therein. 10. Prior to construction, all required building permits shall be obtained from the City’s Building Division. 11. Demolition of any existing structures on site will require demolition permits. 12. All conditions of the permit shall be completely fulfilled to the satisfaction of the affected City Departments and Planning and Building Divisions prior to occupancy of any building. 13. When submitting an application for building permits, applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures. CONSTRUCTION 14. The applicant is responsible for maintaining site security prior to, and throughout the construction process. This includes installation of appropriate fencing, lighting, remote monitors, or on-site security personnel as needed. 15. The applicant is responsible for providing site signage during construction, which contains contact information for questions regarding the construction. 16. Prior to proceeding with exterior construction, the applicant shall provide a full-scale mockup of a section of exterior wall that shows the cladding materials and finishes, windows, trim, and any other architectural features of the building to fully illustrate building fenestration, subject to site inspection and approval by Planning Division staff. 17. After the building permits are approved, but before beginning construction, the owner/applicant shall hold a preconstruction conference with City Planning, Building, Fire and Engineering staff and other interested parties. The developer shall arrange for the attendance of the construction manager, contractor, and all relevant subcontractors. DESIGN REVIEW / SITE PLANNING 1. All equipment (either roof, building, or ground-mounted) shall be screened from view through the use of integral architectural elements, such as enclosures or roof screens, and 226 Page 3 landscape screening or shall be incorporated inside the exterior building wall. Equipment enclosures and/or roof screens shall be painted to match the building. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans showing utility locations, stand-pipes, equipment enclosures, landscape screens, and/or roof screens for review and approval by the Chief Planner or designee. 2. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for landscaping improvements, the applicant shall submit final landscaping and irrigation plans for review and approval by the City’s Chief Planner. The plans shall include documentation of compliance with SSFMC Section 20.300.008, Landscaping. 3. Plant materials shall be replaced when necessary with the same species originally specified unless otherwise approved by the Chief Planner. 4. All landscape areas shall be watered via an automatic irrigation system which shall be maintained in fully operable condition at all times, and which complies with SSFMC Chapter 20.300 (Lot and Development Standards). 5. All planting areas shall be maintained by a qualified professional; the landscape shall be kept on a regular fertilization and maintenance program and shall be maintained weed free. 6. Plant materials shall be selectively pruned by a qualified arborist; no topping or excessive cutting-back shall be permitted. Tree pruning shall allow the natural branching structure to develop. 7. All landscaping installed within the public right-of-way by the property owner shall be maintained by the property owner. 8. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit final landscaping and irrigation plans demonstrating compliance with the State’s Model Water Efficiency Landscaping Ordinance (MWELO), if applicable (See SSFMC Section 20.300.008, and the City’s WELO Document Verification package). a) Projects with a new aggregate landscape of 501 – 2,499 sq. ft. may comply with the prescriptive measures contained in Appendix D of the MWELO. b) Projects with a new aggregate landscape of 2,500 sq. ft. or greater must comply with the performance measures required by the MWELO. c) For all projects subject to the provisions of the MWELO, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Completion to the City, upon completion of the installation of the landscaping and irrigation system. 9. The applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the Design Review Board from their meetings of March 21 and June 20, 2023. 227 Page 4 10. Landscaped areas in the project area may contain trees defined as protected by the South San Francisco Tree Preservation Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30. Any removal or pruning of protected trees shall comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and applicant shall obtain a permit for any tree removals or alterations of protected trees, and avoid tree roots during trenching for utilities. 11. Prior to receiving certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install street furniture, trash receptacles, and bicycle racks along the project sidewalk frontages. The Planning Division shall review and approve all street furniture, trash receptacles and bicycle rack options during the Building Permit process. TRANSPORTATION / PARKING 12. A Parking and Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the project shall be submitted with the application for Building Permit, for review and approval by the Chief Planner and City Engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES / CEQA 13. The applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Initial Study / Negative Declaration. Please contact Adena Friedman, adena.friedman@ssf.net, for questions. 228 City of South San Francisco Water Quality Control Division Date: October 18, 2022 To: Planning Department From: Andrew Wemmer, Environmental Compliance Supervisor Project: P23-0029 Orange Memorial Park – Aquatic Center APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - the following items must be included in the plans or are requirements of the Water Quality Control Stormwater and/or Pretreatment Programs and must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Storm drains must be protected during construction. Discharge of any demolition/construction debris or water to the storm drain system is prohibited. 2. Do not use gravel bags for erosion control in the street or drive aisles. Drains in street must have inlet and throat protection of a material that is not susceptible to breakage from vehicular traffic. 3. No floatable bark shall be used in landscaping. Only fibrous mulch or pea gravel is allowed. 4. After 7/1/19, Demolition Projects must complete a PCBs Screening Assessment Form (attached and available in Building Division). If screening determines the building is an applicable structure, the Protocol for Evaluating PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition shall be followed. Submit a PCB screening package for each address/building containing: 1.) PCBs Screening Form 2.) QAQC checklist 3.) Contractor’s Report 4.) Analytical Results (if applicable) 5. Roof leaders/gutters must NOT be plumbed directly to storm drains; they shall discharge to stormwater treatment devices or landscaping first. 6. Fire sprinkler test drainage must be plumbed to sanitary sewer and be clearly shown on plans. 7. Trash enclosure (if applicable) shall be covered (roof, canopy) and contained (wall/fence). Floor shall slope to a central drain that discharges to the sanitary sewer 229 system. If food prep to be involved, the central drain shall first discharge to a grease trap/interceptor and then connect to the sanitary sewer. Details of trash enclosure shall be clearly provided on plans. 8. Install a condensate drain line connected to the sanitary sewer for rooftop equipment and clearly show on plans. 9. Wherever feasible, install landscaping that minimizes irrigation runoff, promotes surface infiltration, minimizes use of pesticides and fertilizers and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping programs (such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping). 10. Site may be subject to C.3 requirements of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (please see SMCWPPP C.3 Regulated Projects Guide at https://www.flowstobay.org/newdevelopment for guidance). If C.3 is applicable, the following items will be required; 11. Applicant shall provide 100% Low-Impact Development for C.3 stormwater treatment for all of the project’s impervious areas per MRP Section C.3.b. In-lieu of feasible on-site treatment, qualifying applicants may apply for the Special Project Status exemption per Provision C.3.e.ii to Low Impact Development for C.3 treatment. However, the applicant must provide a complete Infeasibility Narrative establishing all of the following (while still treating as much of the runoff via LID onsite as possible): a. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite; b. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures offsite within South San Francisco, providing LID treatment of an equivalent amount of runoff either at a: i. Available Regional Stormwater Project in same watershed ; ii. Property owned by the project proponent in the same watershed; or iii. Planned South San Francisco Green Infrastructure (GI) Stormwater Project. 1. Project options to be made available by City Engineering staff upon request c. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with some combination of LID treatment measures onsite, offsite or at a Regional Project in the same watershed; 230 d. Infeasibility of installing LID treatment within the Right-of-Way. If Applicant chooses to treat any of their Project’s impervious areas within the ROW, Applicant shall size the treatment measures to treat both the Project’s impervious areas and the ROW. The ROW area to be treated shall be from the property line to the street centerline or crown whichever is a greater distance along the entire project frontage. Sizing and design shall conform to the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program design templates and technical guidance and be approved by the Water Quality Control Plant and the Engineering Division. Applicant shall maintain all treatment measures required by the project and enter into a Stormwater Treatment Measure Maintenance Agreement with the City. 12. Completed attached forms for Low Impact Development (C3-C6 Project Checklist). Forms must be on 8.5in X 11in paper and signed and wet stamped by a professional engineer. Calculations must be submitted with this package. Use attached forms for completing documents, as old forms are no longer sufficient Forms can also be found at http://www.flowstobay.org/newdevelopment A completed copy must also be emailed to andrew.wemmer @ssf.net 13. Sign and have engineer wet stamp forms for Low Impact Development. 14. Submit flow calculations and related math for LID. 15. Complete attached Operation and Maintenance (O&M) agreements. Use attached forms for completing documents, as old forms are no longer sufficient Do not sign agreement, as the city will need to review prior to signature. Prepare packet and submit including a preferred return address for owner signature. Packet should also be mailed or emailed to: Andrew Wemmer City of SSF WQCP 195 Belle Air Road South San Francisco, CA 94080 Andrew.wemmer@ssf.net Exhibit Templates can also be found within Chapter 6 the C.3 Technical Guidance at http://www.flowstobay.org/newdevelopment. 16. The onsite catch basins are to be stenciled with the approved San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Logo (No Dumping! Flows to Bay). 17. Landscaping shall meet the following conditions related to reduction of pesticide use on the project site: a. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat stormwater runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain, and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are 231 tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolonged exposure to water shall be specified. b. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. c. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent practicable. d. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. e. Integrated pest management (IPM) principles and techniques shall be encouraged as part of the landscaping design to the maximum extent practicable. Examples of IPM principles and techniques include: i. Select plants that are well adapted to soil conditions at the site. ii. Select plants that are well adapted to sun and shade conditions at the site. In making these selections, consider future conditions when plants reach maturity, as well as seasonal changes. iii. Provide irrigation appropriate to the water requirements of the selected plants. iv. Select pest-resistant and disease-resistant plants. v. Plant a diversity of species to prevent a potential pest infestation from affecting the entire landscaping plan. vi. Use “insectary” plants in the landscaping to attract and keep beneficial insects. 18. A SWPPP must be submitted (if > 1 acre). Drawings must note that erosion control shall be in effect all year long. 19. A copy of the state approved NOI must be submitted (if > 1 acre). Please have applicant contact Andrew Wemmer at Water Quality Control with any questions at (650) 829-3840 or Andrew.wemmer@ssf.net. 232 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT Scott Campbell – Chief of Police ADDRESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE 1 CHESTNUT AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 POLICE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK COMMENTS Monday, October 23, 2023 To: Planning Division From: Sergeant Michael Toscano, Police Department Re: Planning Commission Agenda Items Case No.: P23-0029 Location: Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center All construction must conform to South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 15.48.070 Minimum security standards for non-residential buildings, (Ord. 1477 § 1C, 2013; Ord. 1166 § 1, 1995) 15.48.085 Additional Security Measures May Be Required Per South San Francisco Municipal Code 15.48.085 -Additional Security Measures, the following conditions will also be required: 1) The hardware design of any double doorways shall prevent any doors from being secured in a closed position to either another door or a fixed object within four feet of any door by means of a rope, cable, chain, or similar item. This is to prevent malicious prevention of egress and/or ingress by building occupants or first responders. Pay particular attention to all glass doorways. See possible samples below. Acceptable: 233 Police Department Plan Check Comments Continued… Unacceptable: 3) All exterior doorways shall be illuminated during darkness by a white light source that has full cut-off and is of pedestrian scale. 4) The landing at the lowest level of service staircases, such as those in the garage area or fire escapes, shall have some mechanism, such as fencing and/or a gate, to prevent access to those areas where a person could conceal themselves and/or loiter in said area. The fencing and/or gate shall be at least six feet tall and constructed in a manner that makes it difficult to climb. The fencing and/or gate shall be roughly flush with the lowest step to provide maximum access restriction to the area to the side or of underneath the stairs. Please see below examples. 6) Any exterior bicycle racks installed shall be of an inverted “U” design, or other design that allows two different locking points on each bicycle. 7) Any publicly accessible benches shall be of a design that prevents persons from lying on them, such as a center railing. 8) Any publicly accessible power outlets shall be of a design that prevents their access or use during those hours the business is normally closed. If physical locking covers are used, they must be made of metal, not plastic, and locks must be installed prior to inspection. 9) Any publicly accessible raised edge surfaces, such as retaining walls, concrete benches, handrails, or railings, shall be of a design that prevents or discourages skateboard use on those surfaces. 234 Police Department Plan Check Comments Continued… 10) The mature height of all shrubbery shall be no higher than three feet, if so, it shall be maintained at a maximum height of three feet, and tree canopies shall be no lower than six feet above grade. 11) The applicant shall install and maintain a camera surveillance system that conforms to the minimum technical specifications of South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 8.66.050 Minimum technological standards, (Ord. 1515, 2016). The video surveillance cameras will be used as a crime deterrent and assist with the identification and apprehension of criminals if a crime is committed on the property. Enough cameras shall be installed to provide adequate coverage for the intended space. Cameras shall be placed minimally in the following locations: • All exterior entrances/exits • Garage area (providing coverage to entire parking area) • Bicycle storage area • Main lobby of building • Loading docks The Police Department requires acknowledgement of these comments to include specific locations in the plans where the applicable change requests have been made. The Police Department reserves the right to review and comment upon the submission of revised and updated plans. For questions concerning this project, please contact the Planning Sergeant at (650) 877-8927 or at planningsergeant@ssf.net. Michael Toscano Planning and Crime Prevention Sergeant 235 60% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE JUNE 15, 2023 PROJECT NUMBER: 202206 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW APN: 014041160 PROJECT TEAM LOCATION MAP TENNIS DRIVE ORANGE AVEAUGUST 28, 2023 PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 ADDISON STREET BERKELEY, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 WILLOW ROAD, SUITE 250 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 P: 925.396.7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 BRIDGEWAY SAUSALITO, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 PINE STREET, 6TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 230 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP 2226 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 PROJECT INFO: ZONING DISTRICT: CIVIC DISTRICT - PARKS AND RECREATION PROPOSED: 28'-0" 35'-11" @ NATATORIUM 23'-0" @ POOL STORAGE 29'-0" REQUIRED: 30'-0" 20'-0" 10'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT: SETBACKS: SETBACKS ON ORANGE AVENUE: SETBACKS ON TENNIS DRIVE: 236 GENERAL NOTES SYMBOLS LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT LOCATION SHEET INDEX 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY STUDY AND COMPARE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH EACH OTHER AND SHALL AT ONCE REPORT TO THE ARCHITECT ERRORS, INCONSISTENCIES OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED. IF THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMS ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY KNOWING IT INVOLVES A RECOGNIZED ERROR, INCONSISTENCY OR OMISSION IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT SUCH NOTICE TO THE ARCHITECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME APPROPRIATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PERFORMANCE AND SHALL BEAR AN APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF THE ATTRIBUTABLE COSTS FOR CORRECTION. 2. WHERE NEW CONSTRUCTION ABUTS EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN, ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING WORK PROGRESS AND CONFORMANCE TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED MEASUREMENTS. WHERE DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS OCCUR THEY SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORD WITH THE LATEST RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND/OR LOCAL CODES, LAWS, ORDINANCES, STATUTES AND REGULATIONS. NOTHING IN THE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS REQUIRING OR PERMITTING WORK CONTRARY TO THESE RULES, REGULATIONS, AND CODES. 5. THE DRAWINGS INDICATE LOCATIONS, DIMENSIONS, AND TYPICAL DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION. THE DRAWINGS DO NOT ILLUSTRATE EVERY CONDITION; WORK NOT EXPRESSLY DETAILED SHALL BE OF CONSTRUCTION SIMILAR TO PARTS THAT ARE DETAILED. WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, THEY SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. 6. SITE BOUNDARY LINES, BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, BOUNDARY DECLINATIONS,AND EXISTING GRADES ARE BASED UPON THE SURVEY DRAWING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE INSPECTED THE SITE AND SATISFIED HIMSELF AS TO ACTUAL GRADES, LEVELS, DIMENSIONS, AND DECLINATIONS AND THE TRUE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. 7. MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE GIVEN TO THE NOMINAL FACE OF MASONRY. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. LAY OUT WORK FOLLOWING WRITTEN DIMENSIONS. IF WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE LACKING, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AT ONCE. IF NO LOCATING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN, DOOR OPENINGS ARE LOCATED BY THE DOOR DETAILS. 8. DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO BUILDING DATUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE BIDDING. HARDWOODHDWD. CEM. PLAS. CLKG. C.O. CLO. C.J. CH. CER. C.J. CLG. C.I. CEM. CAULKING CLEAN OUT CLOSET CONSTRUCTION JOINT COAT HOOK CONTROL JOINT CEILING CAST IRON CERAMIC CEMENT PLASTER CEMENT EXPO. EXT. EXP. E.W. E.W.C. EQUIP. EQ. E.P. ENCL. (E) EXPOSED EXTERIOR EXPANSION ELECTRIC WATER COOLER ELECTRICAL PANEL EQUIPMENT EACH WAY EXISTING ENCLOSURE EQUAL INTERMEDIATE INTERIOR INSULATION INSIDE DIAMETER (DIMENSION) HORIZONTAL HOLLOW METAL HARDWARE INTERM. INT. INSUL. I.D. HR. HT. HORIZ. H.M. HDWE. HOUR HEIGHT ADJUSTABLEADJ. B.O. BOT. B.U.R. B.O.C. B.R. B.S. BM. BLKG. BLK. BLDG. BD. BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF CURB BUILT-UP ROOFING BOTTOM BOTTOM OR RISER BOTTOM OF SILL BLOCKING BUILDING BOARD BEAM BLOCK APPROX. ASPH. BTW. ALT. ARCH. A.P. ALUM. AGGR. A.F.F. ASPHALT BETWEEN ARCHITECT APPROXIMATE ACCESS PANEL ALTERNATE ALUMINUM AGGREGATE ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ACOUS. A.D. A.B. A.C. ABV. #T∅ ANCHOR BOLT AREA DRAIN ACOUSTICAL ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ABOVE POUND, NUMBER PERPENDICULAR DIAMETER, ROUND CL @ & PL d CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE PENNY (NAIL) AT ANGLE AND DRINKING FOUNTAIN E.F. ELEV. ELEC. E.J. EL. E.B. D.S.P. EA. E. EXHAUST FAN EXPANSION JOINT ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR ELEVATION EXPANSION BOLT EACH EAST DRY STANDPIPE DIM. D.W.P. DWR. DWG. DR. D.O. DN. DISP. D.D DIAG. DIA. D.F. DET. DEMO. DIMENSION DESIGN WORKING POINT DOOR DRAWER DRAWING DOOR OPENING DISPENSER DOWN DETAIL DIAGONAL DIAMETER DECK DRAIN DEMOLISH HOLLOW CORE HOSE BIBB GROUND H.B. HDR. H.C. H. HEADER HIGH GYP. GR. GND. GL. GYPSUM GRADE GLASS GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GYPSUM WALL BOARD GRAB BAR GALVANIZED FURRING FOUNDATION FOOTING FOOT, FEET G.B. G.F.I. GWB. GALV. GA.GAUGE FURR. FND. FTG. FT. D. C.T. CTR. CPT. CNTR. CTSK. CORR. CONT. CONST. DEEP CENTER CARPET COUNTER COUNTERSINK CERAMIC TILE CORRIDOR CONTINUOUS CONSTRUCTION C.M.U. CONC. COMP. COL. CLR. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONCRETE COMPOSITION COLUMN CLEAR FACE OF FRAMING FIREPROOF FACE OF STUDS FACE OF FINISH FACE OF CONCRETE FLASHING FIRE HOSE CABINET FINISH FLOOR FIRE HYDRANT FRMG. FPRF. F.O. F.O.S. F.O.F. F.O.C. FLASH. FLR. FIXT. FIN. F.H.C. F.F. F.H. FLOOR FIXTURE FINISH FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FIRE EXTINGUISHER FOUNDATION FLOOR DRAIN FIRE ALARM F.E.C. F.E. FDN. F.D. F.A. OVERFLOW DRAINOD S.P.R. S.O.G. S.N.D. S.M.D. S.H.V.C. CONTRACTOR INSTALLED OWNER FURNISHED OUTSIDE DIAMETER PLUMB.PLUMBING OPP. OPNG. O.F.C.I. O.D. OPPOSITE OPENING S.S.D. S.S. SQ. SPEC. S.L.D. S.M. SIM. SHT. SHR. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SQUARE FOOT, SQUARE FEET SINGLE-PLY ROOFING SLAB ON GRADE SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SURFACE MOUNTED HOSE STAINLESS STEEL SQUARE SPECIFICATION VALVE CABINET SHEET METAL SIMILAR SHEET SHOWER W.S. WT. WSCT. W/O WR WP. W.F. W.O. WD. WOOD SCREW WEIGHT WAINSCOT WIDE FLANGE WHERE OCCURS WATER RESISTANT WATERPROOF WITHOUT WOOD T. & G. RADIUSr. S.C.D. R.W.L. RDWD. RESIL. REQ'D REINF. REFER. MULLIONMUL. NOT TO SCALE NOT IN CONTRACT NOMINALNOM. O.C. O.A. N.T.S. ON CENTER OVERALL (N) NO. N.I.C. N. NEW NUMBER NORTH SH. S.E.D. SECT. S.D. S. SCH. S.C. R.B. R.O. RM. MASONRY OPENING MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURER MACHINE BOLT MINIMUMMIN. MTD. MTL. M.O. MISC. MIR. MOUNTED METAL MIRROR MECH. MH. MFR. MEMB. M.B. MAX. MECHANICAL MANHOLE MEMBRANE MAXIMUM REV. RET. REF. RGTR. R.D. (R) R. U.O.N. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RAIN WATER LEADER SHELF SECTION SOAP DISPENSER SCHEDULE SOLID CORE SOUTH RUBBER BASE REDWOOD ROUGH OPENING ROOM V.I.F. W W.C. W/ W. VEST. VERT. V.T. UR. REQUIRED REVISION, REVISED RETAINING RESILIENT REINFORCED REGISTER REFRIGERATOR REFERENCE ROOF DRAIN REMOVE RISER TRANSF. UNF. TYP. T.O.W. T.O.B. T.O.C T.P.D. T.O.S. T.O. THR. THK. PTN. PLYWD. P.LAM. PREFAB. PRCST. LT. L. LOC. LKR. LIGHT LONG LOCATION LOCKER LAV. LAM. L.B. LAVATORY LAMINATE LAG BOLT P.T.R. PTD PT. PR. PTP JT. JST. JAN. JOINT JOIST JANITOR PLAS. PL. PTDF PAPER TOWEL RECPTACLE PHENOLIC TOILET PARTITION PARTITION PAINTED POINT, POINT PAIR PLYWOOD TEMP. T T.C. T.B. SYM. S.V. SUSP. PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR PLASTER PLASTIC LAMINATE PLATE PRE-FABRICATED PRECAST STRUCT. STOR. STL. TONGUE AND GROOVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VERIFY IN FIELD WATER CLOSET WIDE WITH WEST VESTIBULE VERTICAL VINYL TILE URINAL TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TRANSFORMER UNFINISHED TYPICAL TOP OF WALL TOP OF BENCH TOP OF CONCRETE TOP OF TOP OF STRUCTURE THRESHOLD THICK TEMPERED TALL TOP OF CURB TOWEL BAR SYMMETRICAL SHEET VINYL SUSPENDED STRUCTURAL STORAGE STEEL CW.CURTAIN WALL PLAN NORTH ROOM KEY BUILDING SECTION KEY KEY NOTE DETAIL PLAN KEY EXTERIOR ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION DRAWING TITLE GRID LINE REFERENCE SCALE TITLE ELEVATION TARGET DOOR NUMBER 3 GRID T TEMPERED GLASS # 123 ROOM ROOM NAME ROOM # P - # SCALE: 1" = 4'-0" 0 2'4'8' GRAPHIC SCALE GRID SPOT ELEVATION 1 DRAWING REVISION MATCHLINEXX/A.XX +21'-0" VIEW 4 3 SHEET 2 1 SHEET 1 VIEW LEVEL 0'-0" SHEET NO. NO. SHEET DETAIL SECTION KEY NO. SHEET PAINT TYPE 101 PARTITION TYPE 2 HR ASSEMBLY WORK POINT DENOTES EXTERIOR WALL E # 1 HR ASSEMBLY ORANGE AVE.TENNI S DR. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT WILL BE BUILT WITHIN THE EXISTING ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AT THE CORNER OF TENNIS DRIVE AND ORANGE AVENUE. THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES A NEW BUILDING WITH INDOOR POOL, OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL, AND SITEWORK. POOL CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE UNDER THIS PERMIT. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING AQUATICS CENTER IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE. DEMOLITION WILL NOT OCCUR UNTIL THE NEW AQUATICS CENTER IS OPERATIONAL. DEMOLITION SCOPE INCLUDES ONE BUILDING WITH AN INDOOR POOL, AN EXISTING PARKING LOT, AND SITE WORK. THE EXISTING INDOOR POOL WILL NEED TO BE INFILLED. THE BUILDING WILL NOT SERVE AS AN EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTER. OWNER CONTACT CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 33 ARROYO DRIVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 PHILIP VITALE, JR., DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL PROJECTS PHILIP.VITALE@SSF.NET (650) 877-8548 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING JOHN BAKER, PROJECT EXECUTIVE JBAKER@SWINERTON.COM (415) 710-8059 LINDA RIZZOLI, SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER LRIZZOLI@SWINERTON.COM (650) 218-8726 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AFTER EACH ITEM HAS FIRST BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE COMPLETE WORKING DRAWINGS AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED ENGINEER. 1. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 2. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 3. BUILDING AUTOMATION & MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 4. EXTERIOR NON-STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING 5. ALUMINUM BLEACHERS TO COMPLY WITH ICC 300 6. UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE 7. STOREFRONT AND CURTAIN WALL FRAMING 8. MECHANICAL UNIT SUPPORTS AT ROOF 9. SEE SHEET S000 FOR DELEGATED DESIGN ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED TO AHJ 10.FALL ARREST SYSTEM 11. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SF. S. A.C.C.ACCESSIBLE R.C.P.REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SF - #STOREFRONT TYPE L LAMINATED GLASS WALL SECTION KEYSHEET NO. A.C.T.ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE B.O.D BASIS OF DESIGN SASM SAF SELF-ADHERED SHEET MEMBRANE SELF-ADHERED FLASHING APN #014041160 BID DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES 1. REMOVE (10) SOLATUBES AS SHOWN ON RCP AND ROOF PLAN. 2. REPLACE SLIDING GLASS PARTITION AT ACTIVITY ROOM WITH STOREFRONT TO MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT. INCLUDE 3'-0" WIDE DOOR. 3. REPLACE COMPOSITE WOOD CEILING WITH PAINTED GYP. BOARD. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET INDEX SHEET A001 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 MECHANICAL M001 LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST M003 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS M004 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS M005 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS M006 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS M200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - HVAC M205 LOW ROOF PLAN - HVAC M401 DETAILS M402 DETAILS M403 DETAILS M404 DETAILS M405 DETAILS M501 SCHEDULES M502 SCHEDULES M601 FLOW DIAGRAMS M701 CONTROL DIAGRAMS M702 CONTROL DIAGRAMS M703 CONTROL DIAGRAMS M704 CONTROL DIAGRAMS ELECTRICAL E001 LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST E002 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS E003 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS E004 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS E101 OVERALL SITE PLAN - LIGHTING E102 OVERALL SITE PLAN - POWER E200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - LIGHTING E300 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - POWER E301 LOW ROOF PLAN - POWER E401 ENLARGED PLANS E501 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM E601 LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE E602 LIGHTING CONTROL SOO E604 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES 480Y/227V-3Ø-4W E605 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES 208Y/120V-3Ø-4W E701 DETAILS E702 DETAILS E703 DETAILS E704 DETAILS E705 DETAILS PLUMBING P001 LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST P002 TITLE 24 CALCULATIONS P200U FOUNDATION PLAN LEVEL 1 - PLUMBING P202 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 INDOOR POOL - PLUMBING P205 LOW ROOF PLAN - PLUMBING P206 NATATORIUM ROOF PLAN - PLUMBING P401 DETAILS P402 DETAILS P403 DETAILS P501 SCHEDULES P601 DOMESTIC WATER DIAGRAM P602 SANITARY WASTE DIAGRAM P603 STORM DRAIN DIAGRAM P604 POOL HEATING PIPING DIAGRAM FIRE ALARM (for reference only) FA001 FIRE ALARM LEGEND, NOTES AND REQUIRERMENTS FA101 OVERALL SITE PLAN - FIRE ALARM FA200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - FIRE ALARM FA201 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 OUTDOOR POOL - FIRE ALARM FA501 RISER DIAGRAM - FIRE ALARM FA701 DETAILS - FIRE ALARM FA702 DETAILS - FIRE ALARM FA703 DETAILS - FIRE ALARM TELECOM T001 LEGEND, NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS - TELECOM T100 OVERALL TELECOM CONDUIT SITE PLAN T101 OVERALL SITE PLAN - TELECOM T200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - TELECOM T201 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 OUTDOOR POOL - TELECOM T501 RISER DIAGRAMS AND RACK ELEVATIONS - TELECOM T701 DETAILS - TELECOM T702 DETAILS - TELECOM T703 DETAILS - TELECOM T704 DETAILS - TELECOM T705 ERRCS TESTING ZONES SECURITY TS001 LEGEND, NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS - SECURITY TS101 SITE PLAN - SECURITY TS200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - SECURITY TS201 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 OUTDOOR POOL - SECURITY TS501 RISER DIAGRAMS - SECURITY TS701 DETAILS - SECURITY TS702 DETAILS - SECURITY TS703 DETAILS - SECURITY AUDIO VISUAL TV001 LEGEND, NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS - AUDIO VISUAL TV200 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - AUDIO VISUAL TV201 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 OUTDOOR POOL AUDIO VISUAL TV501 AUDIO VISUAL BLOCK DIAGRAMS TV701 DETAILS - AUDIO VISUAL AQUATICS DP-1 OUTDOOR POOL DECK PLAN SP-1 OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT PLAN SP-2 OVERALL POOL PIPING PLAN SP-3 INDOOR / OUTDOOR POOL UNDERWATER LIGHT PLAN SP-4 OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL SECTIONS SP-5 DETAILS SP-6 DETAILS SP-7 DETAILS SP-8 DETAILS SP-9 DETAILS SP-10 DETAILS AP-1 INDOOR ACTIVITY POOL LAYOUT PLAN AP-2 INDOOR ACTIVITY POOL SECTIONS AP-3 DETAILS AP-4 DETAILS AP-5 DETAILS AP-6 DETAILS AP-7 DETAILS MR-1 MECHANICAL ROOM LAYOUT PLAN MR-2 PUMP PIT / BACKWASH PIT SECTION MR-3 DETAILS MR-4 DETAILS MR-5 DETAILS MR-6 DETAILS MR-7 DETAILS MR-8 DETAILS MR-9 DETAILS ADMINISTRATIVE A000 COVER SHEET A001 INDEX SHEET A002 CODE ANALYSIS A003 EGRESS PLAN A010 CALGREEN CHECKLIST A011 CALGREEN CHECKLIST A012 CALGREEN CHECKLIST A020 RESTROOM ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS A021 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS CIVIL C001 COVER AND PROJECT NOTES C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS C200 UTILITY DEMOLITION PLAN C300 ROUGH GRADING PLAN C301 ROUGH GRADING SECTIONS C302 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C400 SITE UTILITY PLAN C500 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN C600 PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN C601 TEMPORARY PHASE PLAN C602 TEMPORARY PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN C700 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C701 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C702 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DATA SHEET C800 CIVIL DETAILS C801 CIVIL DETAILS C802 CIVIL DETAILS C803 CIVIL DETAILS C900 FIRE ACCESS PLAN LANDSCAPE L000 EXISTING CONDITION AERIAL L001 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN L100 LAYOUT PLAN L101 SITE SECTIONS - ORANGE AVE & TENNIS DR L102 SITE SECTIONS - DROP-OFF & LANDFORM AT WIND SCREEN L103 SITE SECTIONS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK & ENTRY PLAZA L104 ACCESS DIAGRAM INITIAL PHASE L105 ACCESS DIAGRAM PHASE 1B L200 GRADING PLAN L300 IRRIGATION PLAN L301 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES L302 IRRIGATION DETAILS L303 IRRIGATION DETAILS L304 IRRIGATION DETAILS L305 IRRIGATION DETAILS L400 PLANTING PLAN L401 PLANTING LIST L402 PLANTING DETAILS L403 TREE SHADE L500 PAVING DETAILS L501 FENCE, WALL, AND SITE FURNISHING DETAILS L502 VETERANS MEMORIAL DETAIL ARCHITECTURE A100 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A101 OVERALL SITE PLAN A105 PLANS AND ELEVATIONS - POOL STORAGE A106 SECTIONS AND DETAILS - POOL STORAGE A110 SITE DETAILS A200 FLOOR PLAN A201 FLOOR PLAN - OUTDOOR POOL A202 SLAB PLAN A203 CMU LAYOUT PLAN A205 ROOF PLAN A300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A305 BUILDING SECTIONS A306 BUILDING SECTIONS A308 SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS POOL WIND SCREEN A309 PLAN AND SECTIONS - MECHANICAL SCREEN A310 WALL SECTIONS A311 WALL SECTIONS A312 WALL SECTIONS A313 WALL SECTIONS A314 WALL SECTIONS A400 ENLARGED PLANS, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS & ACCESSORIES A401 ENLARGED PLANS & ELEVATIONS - WOMEN'S LOCKER A402 ENLARGED PLANS & ELEVATIONS - MEN'S LOCKER A403 ENLARGED PLANS & ELEVATIONS - FAMILY CHANGING A404 ENLARGED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS - STAFF A405 ENLARGED PLANS & ELEVATIONS - WOMEN'S LOCKER A406 ENLARGED PLANS & ELEVATIONS - MEN'S LOCKER A500 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - LOBBY A501 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A502 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NATATORIUM A503 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NATATORIUM A600 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A800 SCHEDULES A801 SIGNAGE TYPE AND DETAILS A802 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE DETAILS A803 METAL PANEL SCHEDULE A804 METAL PANEL SCHEDULE A805 STOREFRONT SCHEDULE A806 STOREFRONT & CURTAIN WALL SCHEDULE NATATORIUM A810 EXTERIOR WALL TYPES A811 EXTERIOR DETAILS - WALL BASE A812 EXTERIOR WALL DETAILS A813 EXTERIOR WALL DETAILS A820 EXTERIOR DETAILS - CURTAINWALL AND STOREFRONT A821 EXTERIOR DOOR DETAILS A830 ROOF DETAILS A831 ROOF DETAILS A840 EXTERIOR DETAILS - ENLARGED WATERPROOFING A900 INTERIOR PARTITION TYPES A901 INTERIOR PARTITION DETAILS - TYP. NON-BEARING A902 INTERIOR DETAILS - WALL A903 INTERIOR DETAILS - STOREFRONT A910 CEILING DETAILS - GYP BOARD & PLASTER A911 CEILING DETAILS - LINEAR WOOD COMPOSITE A912 CEILING DETAILS - ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE A920 INTERIOR DETAILS - DOOR, BASE AND FLOOR A930 INTERIOR DETAILS - CASEWORK & MISCELLANEOUS A931 ENLARGED PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS - RECEPTION DESK STRUCTURAL S001 GENERAL NOTES & SHEET LIST S002 GENERAL NOTES S003 GENERAL NOTES S004 MASTER ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS S100 LOAD PLANS AND ISOMETRICS S200 SITE PLAN S201 FOUNDATION PLAN S202 LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN S203 NATATORIUM ROOF FRAMING PLAN S301 BUILDING ELEVATIONS S302 BUILDING ELEVATIONS S303 BRACED FRAME ELEVATIONS S304 CMU WALL ELEVATIONS S401 SECTIONS S501 TYPICAL CONCRETE DETAILS S502 TYPICAL CONCRETE DETAILS S503 TYPICAL CONCRETE DETAILS S511 FOUNDATION SCHEDULE & DETAILS S512 CONCRETE DETAILS S601 TYP. CONC. MASONRY UNIT (CMU) DETAILS S602 TYP. NON-LOAD BEARING CONC. MASONRY UNIT (CMU) DETAILS S701 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS S702 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS S703 TYPICAL METAL DECK DETAILS S704 TYPICAL METAL DECK DETAILS S705 STEEL COLUMN SCHEDULE & DETAILS S706 MISC STEEL DETAILS S721 BRB DETAILS S722 STEEL COLLECTOR DETAILS (SFRS) S723 TYPICAL BRB BASE PLATE DETAIL (SFRS) S731 SITE STEEL DETAILS REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION A000 A001 A002 A003 C001 C100 C300 C301 C302 C400 C600 C900 L000 L001 L100 L101 L102 L103 L200 L300 L301 L400 L401 L402 L403 L500 L501 L502 A100 A101 A105 A106 A110 A200 A201 A205 A300 A301 A305 A306 A308 A309 A802 E101 E200 E601 Z000 Z001 Z002 -COVER SHEET -INDEX SHEET -CODE ANALYSIS -EGRESS PLAN - COVER AND PROJECT NOTES -EXISTING CONDITIONS -ROUGH GRADING PLAN -ROUGH GRADING SECTIONS -GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN -SITE UTILITY PLAN -PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN -FIRE ACCESS PLAN -EXISTING CONDITION AERIAL -ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN -LAYOUT PLAN -SITE SECTIONS - ORANGE AVE & TENNIS DR -SITE SECTIONS - DROP-OFF & LANDFORM AT WINDSCREEN -SITE SECTIONS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK & ENTRY PLAZA -GRADING PLAN -IRRIGATION PLAN -IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES -PLANTING PLAN -PLANTING LIST -PLANTING DETAILS -TREE SHADE -PAVING DETAILS -FENCE, WALL, AND SITE FURNISHING DETAILS -VETERANS MEMORIAL DETAIL -DEMOLITION SITE PLAN -OVERALL SITE PLAN -PLANS AND ELEVATIONS - POOL STORAGE -SECTIONS AND DETAILS - POOL STORAGE -SITE DETAILS -FLOOR PLAN -FLOOR PLAN - OUTDOOR POOL -ROOF PLAN -ELEVATIONS -ELEVATIONS -BUILDING SECTIONS -BUILDING SECTIONS -SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS POOL WINDSCREEN -PLAN AND SECTIONS - MECHANICAL SCREEN -EXTERIOR SIGNAGE DETAILS -OVERALL SITE PLAN - LIGHTING -FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - LIGHTING -LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE -PROJECT RENDERINGS -EXTERIOR MATERIALS -SITE PHOTOS PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION237 CODE ANALYSIS Plumbing Fixture Count --Swimming Pools (Based on CBC Ch. 31) Plumbing Fixture Calculation per CBC Section 3116B.2--Dept. of Public Health Size (SF) Outdoor Pool - 25M x 25 YD 6226 Indoor Activity Pool Required Fixture Count Women 5430 Occ. 389 389 778 Load Factor Occ. Load Male Female Men Totals 15 15 WC 6 7 416 362 Urinals 6 / 208 181 Lavs 5 5 208 181 Showers 8 8 Drinking Fountain 4 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Applicable Codes: California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Published by the California Building Standards Commission: Part 1, “2022 California Administrative Code”(CAC) Part 2, “2022 California Building Code”(CBC) Part 3, “2022 California Electrical Code”(CEC) Part 4, “2022 California Mechanical Code”(CMC) Part 5, “2022 California Plumbing Code”(CPC) Part 6, “2022 California Energy Code”(CEC) Part 9, “2022 California Fire Code”(CFC) Part 11, “2022 California Green Building Standards Code” Part 12, “2022 California Reference Standards Code” City of South San Francisco Municipal Code CBC Chapter 3: Occupancies A-3 Indoor Swimming Pool without Spectator Seating A-5 Outdoor Swimming Pool with Spectator Seating A-3 Activity Room B Offices S-2 Low Hazard Storage CBC Chapter 5: Occupancy Separation Section 508.3 Nonseparated occupancies: Different occupancies are not required to be separated as long as building area and height are based on the requirements of the most restrictive occupancy. The most restrictive occupancy is A-3, therefore if the building complies with code allowances for A-3 occupancy we can consider the building to be a nonseparated A-3 occupancy. CBC Chapter 5: General Building Heights and Areas The building is to be of Type VB construction and will be fully sprinklered. The building height is one story with a maximum height of 30’-0”. Chapter 9: Fire Protection Systems Fire Area: Fire area is defined as the floor area enclosed by exterior building walls. Horizontal projections of the roof or floor above shall be included in the fire area. Section 903.2.1.3: Group A-3 occupancies are required to have fire sprinklers when the fire area excess 12,000 sf or the fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more. City of South San Francisco Code Amendments Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 903.2. Where required.Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.12 whichever is the more restrictive. 1. In other than residential buildings which require the installation of fire sprinkler for all new buildings according to the California Building Code, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures greater than 1,000 square feet of building area. CBC Chapter 10: Means of Egress Means of egress is to be provided per the calculated occupant loads for the various occupancy groups per Table 1004.5. The number of exits provided are based on the calculated occupant loads per Tables 1006.3.1 and 1006.3.2(2) with 2 exits provided where there are more than 49 occupants, 3 exits for more than 500 occupants and 4 exits for more than 1,000 occupants. The egress component widths for the exterior areas such as the pool and pool deck will be calculated per CBC Sections 1005.3.1 and 1005.3.2 as unsprinklered areas. CBC Chapter 16 Section 1604 Table 1604.5: Risk Category of Buildings and Other Structures The project is designed as Risk Category II -See Structural Drawings. The project does not fall under any of the types listed under Risk Category I. The building will not serve as an essential facility and therefore does not fall under Risk Category IV. Per the IBC Commentary, see following area analysis which demonstrates that the public assembly occupancy equates to less than 50% of the overall building square footage -therefore the building does not fall under Risk Category III. Construction Type Most Restrictive Occupancy Area (SF) Per Table 506.2 Height (Stories and Feet) VB A-3 24,000 [S1] 1 / 40' Building Element Type VB Construction Primary Structural Frame 0 hours CBC Chapter 6: Types of Construction Bearing Walls - Exterior Bearing Walls - Interior Nonbearing Walls and Partitions - Exterior Nonbearing Walls and Partitions - Interior Floor Construction and Associated Secondary Members Roof Construction and Associated Secondary Members 0 hours 0 hours 0 hours 0 hours 0 hours 0 hours 642 feet out of 892 feet face open space = 72% If per table CBC Table 506.3.3 = 0.50 Allowable Area Calculation: Aa = [At+ (NS x If)] Aa = 24,000 + (6,000 x .5) Aa = 27,000 sf Men's Locker Rooms Women's Locker Rooms Provided Fixture Count 15Total Fixtures WC 7 4 Urinals / 7 Lavs 5 5 Showers 7 7 2 Family Changing Rooms (Gender Neutral) Drinking Fountain Public Restroom 2 /2 2 1 /1 7 14 26 6 13 6 10 16 PLUMBING FIXTURE ANALYSIS (PER CBC CH. 31) PLUMBING FIXTURE ANALYSIS (PER CPC) Base Scope Enclosed Building Area Total Building Area Building Area in Square Feet (per Section 202) 22,500 24,655 Staff Changing Rooms Pool Deck (Gender Neutral) 1 /1 / 2 8 4 Plumbing Fixture Calculation per CPC Table 4-1 Size (SF) Lobby 1915 Indoor Activity Pool Required Fixture Count Women 5430 Occ. 608 608 1215 Load Factor Occ. Load Men Totals 30 50 WC 4 10 64 109 Urinals 5 / Lavs 4 6 Drinking Fountain 414 5 10 Room Exterior Pool Deck - Seating 84 Exterior Pool Deck 5743 11 522 Outdoor Pool - 25M x 25 YD 6226 50 125 OUTDOOR POOL DECK NATATORIUM Indoor Pool Deck 3100 11 282 Office 1 Lifeguard Office Office 2 Activity Room TOTAL 1215 BUILDING INTERIOR 130 150 1 134 150 1 130 150 1 762 30 26 Notes Half of capacity PROVIDED FIXTURE COUNT Area within horizontal projection of Roof 1,693 Pool Storage 462 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET CODE ANALYSIS A002 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION Number Name OCC Class Area A3 CORRIDOR 312 SF A5 FAMILY CHANGING 96 SF A6 ADULT CHANGING 178 SF A20 RESTROOM 69 SF A23 RESTROOM 97 SF A25 STAFF SHOWER 40 SF 792 SF A-3 A27 ACTIVITY ROOM A-3 753 SF A30 INDOOR POOL DECK A-3 2,379 SF N1 NATATORIUM A-3 5,300 SF 8,432 SF B A1 LOBBY B 1,880 SF A2 WOMEN'S LOCKER B 835 SF A7 MEN'S LOCKER B 802 SF A19 OFFICE B 143 SF A21 LIFE GUARD B 221 SF A22 OFFICE B 120 SF A28 WOMEN'S LOCKER B 562 SF A29 MEN'S LOCKER B 568 SF 5,129 SF S-2 A4 JANITOR STORAGE S-2 255 SF A8 IDF S-2 144 SF A9 TRASH S-2 185 SF A10 FIRE RISER S-2 65 SF A11 ACID S-2 68 SF A12 CHLORINE S-2 87 SF A13 ELEC S-2 281 SF A14 POOL MECH S-2 2,006 SF A15 POOL STORAGE S-2 462 SF 3,553 SF Grand total: 26 17,907 SF A-3 CATEGORY = 47% OF OVERALL BUILDING SF PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION238 STOPSTOPNO PARKINGXINGBIKELANE15STOPAHEAD1. EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THEY ARE READILY VISIBLE AND CLEARLY INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL. 2. MEANS OF EGRESS, SPECIFICALLY EXIT DISCHARGE, SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT ALL TIMES THE SPACE SERVED BY THE MEANS OF EGRESS IS OCCUPIED. 3. CIRCULATION PATHS OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL HAVE A SLIP-RESISTANT SURFACE AND BE SECURELY ATTACHED PER CBC 1003.4. SEE SPECS FOR MORE INFORMATION OF REQUIREMENTS. 4. WIDTH OF EGRESS COMPONENTS = OCCUPANT LOAD TIMES 0.2 INCHES PER CBC 1005.3.2. 5. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT ALL TIMES DURING THE SPACE IS OCCUPIED. 6. BUILDING IS EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY VOICE / ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 907.5.2.2, SEE FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. KNOX BOX -SURFACE MOUNTEDK-KB PANIC HARDWARE, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE AND SPECS COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL LIMIT (SPACES WITH 1 EXIT): A OCCUPANCIES = 75' B & S OCCUPANCIES = 100' A & B OCCUPANCIES ARE PERMITTED UP TO 49 OCCUPANTS S OCCUPANCIES ARE PERMITTED UP TO 29 OCCUPANTS EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE (CBC TABLE 1017.2): A OCCUPANCY = 250', FULLY-SPRINKLERED S-2 OCCUPANCY = 400', FULLY-SPRINKLERED B OCCUPANCY = 300', FULLY-SPRINKLERED EGRESS WIDTH CALCULATION: EGRESS COMPONENT OTHER THAN STAIR: OCCUPANT LOAD X 0.20 = REQUIRED WIDTH EGRESS COMPONENT OTHER THAN STAIR, FULLY SPRINKLERED W/ VOICE ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM: OCCUPANT LOAD X .15 = REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH (INCHES) NOTE: OCCUPANT LOAD FACTORS ARE CALCULATED USING EXCEPTION #1 UNDER 1005.3.2 (OTHER EGRESS COMPONENTS) FOR BUILDINGS EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND AN EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. 100'PATH OF TRAVEL DISTANCE TO EXIT PH 95000 100 Name AREA NAME (SEE EGRESS SCHEDULE) OCCUPANT LOAD AREA (SF) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL C COMPANION SEAT LIMIT OF WORK PROPERTY LINE E TACTILE "EXIT" SIGN, ER TACTILE "EXIT ROUTE" SIGN, OS MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY SIGN, SEE 15 / A801 SEE 11 / A801 SEE 4 / A801 S SEMI-AMBULANT SEAT A AISLE SEAT FOR ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNAGE, S.E.D. 1880 SF 126 LOBBY 835 SF 17 WOMEN'S LOCKER 802 SF 17 MEN'S LOCKER 753 SF 51 ACTIVITY ROOM 255 SF 1 JANITOR STORAGE CORRIDOR FAMILY CHANGING ADULT CHANGING 144 SF 1 IDF 185 SF 1 TRASH 68 SF 1 ACID 2006 SF 7 POOL MECH 143 SF 1 OFFICE 221 SF 2 LIFE GUARD 120 SF 1 OFFICE RESTROOM 562 SF 12 WOMEN'S LOCKER 568 SF 12 MEN'S LOCKER 5300 SF 107 NATATORIUM RESTROOM 281 SF 1 ELEC 87 SF 1 CHLORINE 65 SF 1 FIRE RISER 462 SF 2 POOL STORAGE STAFF SHOWER ACCESSORY MECHANICAL AND STORAGE AREAS ASSEMBLY USE - CONCENTRATED ASSEMBLY USE - FIXED SEATING ASSEMBLY USE - LOCKER ROOMS ASSEMBLY USE - UNCONCENTRATED BUSINESS USE - GENERAL SWIMMING POOLS - DECK SWIMMING POOLS - POOL UNOCCUPIED 2379 SF 159 INDOOR POOL DECK 6287 SF 126 OUTDOOR POOL 2104 SF 141 OUTDOOR POOL DECK 1/3 = 12.8'38' - 5 7/16"2625 1 7 1 1 1 1 8 9 1 1 11 12 12 2 9 8 2 1 1 71 36 36 72 71 909090 CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 27 1/2" 27 1/2" 72" 184 184 0.15 32" CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 13 1/2" 13 1/2" 72" 90 90 0.15 32" 1376 SF 197 LAWN 440 SF 125 BLEACHERS CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 34" 34" 72" 228 228 0.15 34" 138 138 207 138 CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 20 1/2" 20 1/2" 72" 138 138 0.15 32" CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 20 1/2" 20 1/2" 72" 138 138 0.15 32" CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 83" 83" 144" 414 414 0.2 83" 228 CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 20 1/2" 20 1/2" 72" 138 138 0.15 32" 14' - 10 5/8"3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 0"60' - 8"6' - 0"6' - 0"4' - 0"6' - 0"C S C S C S C S10' - 1"AISLE4' - 6"10' - 1"AISLE4' - 6"A A main exit per CBC 1029.2 CALCULATED EXIT WIDTH: EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED: X = REQUIRED WIDTH: 21 1/2" 21 1/2" 72" 143 143 0.15 32" main exit per CBC 1029.2 207 414 6' - 0"6' - 0" OS ER ER E E E ER E E E E E E EE E E E ER ER PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH PH F.E.C. F.E.C.F.E.C. F.E. F.E. F.E.C. F.E.C. F.E.C. 97' 171' 97' K-KB K-KB K-KB K-KB OS OS 14' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 11"6' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET EGRESS PLAN A003 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 LEGEND GENERAL NOTES - EGRESS **OUTDOOR POOL & POOL DECK OCCUPANT LOAD: 589 EXTERIOR OCCUPANTS + 215 FROM NATATORIUM + 24 FROM LOCKER ROOMS + 90 FROM LOBBY = 918 (3 EXITS REQUIRED, 4 PROVIDED) ACCESSIBILITY NOTES 1. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AS INDICATED ON PLAN IS A BARRIER- FREE ACCESS ROUTE WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT LEVEL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1/2”IF BEVELED AT 1:2 MAX SLOPE, OR VERTICAL LEVEL CHANGES NOT EXCEEDING 1/4”MAX, AND AT LEAST 48”IN WIDTH. SURFACE IS STABLE, FIRM, AND SLIP RESISTANT. CROSS SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 5%, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80”MINIMUM, AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4”PROJECTION FROM WALL AND ABOVE 27”AND LESS THAN 80”. ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 2. SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS FOR POOL ACCESSIBILTY FEATURES. 3. PER CBC 11B-221.5, LAWN SEATING IS ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSBILE PATH OF TRAVEL. 4. FOR EXTERIOR THRESHOLDS, SEE SHEET A821. SEATING EGRESS NOTES PER CBC 1030.9.1 MINIMUM AISLE WIDTH • SEATING ON BOTH SIDES: 48" MINIMUM OR 36" WHERE SERVING < 50 SEATS • SEATING ON ONE SIDE: 36" MINIMUM CLEAR, OR 23" WHERE THE STEPPED AISLE SERVES <5 ROWS ON ONE SIDE. • 23" MINIMUM BETWEEN STEPPED AISLE HANDRAIL AND SEATING WHEN AISLE IS SUBDIVIDED BY A MID-AISLE HANDRAIL BLECAHER AISLES: • 48" MIN. REQ'D (SEATING ON 2 SIDES WITH <5 ROWS) • 54" CLEAR WIDTH PROVIDED WHEELCHAIR SEATING PER CBC 11-221.2: TOTAL # OF BENCH SEATS = 125 PER CBC TABLE 11B-221.2.1.1, 4 WC SPACES ARE REQUIRED. 4 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. COMPANION SEATS: PER CBC 11B-221.3, 1 COMPANION SEAT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH WC SPACE. 4 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. SEMI-AMBULATORY SEATS: PER CBC 11B-221.6, 1% OF TOTAL # OF SEATS, OR MINIMUM OF 2 ARE REQUIRED. 1% OF 125= 1.25 = 2 REQUIRED. 4 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. MORE THAN 24" OF LEGROOM IS AVAILABLE AT ANY 1ST ROW SEAT AT THE POOL DECK LEVEL DESIGNATED AISLE SEATS: CBC 11B-221.4, 5% OF TOTAL # AISLE SEATS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AISLE SEATS. 5% OF 12 AISLE SEATS = 0.6 = 1 REQUIRED. 2 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. 1/16" = 1'-0"1 EGRESS PLAN OCCUPANCY SCHEDULE Number Name OCC Class Area Occupany Load Factor OLF Type Occupant Load # Exits POOL DECK EGRESS A33 LAWN A-5 1,376 SF 7.0 NSF 197 2 A31 OUTDOOR POOL A-5 6,287 SF 50.0 GSF 126 2 A32 OUTDOOR POOL DECK A-5 2,104 SF 15.0 GSF 141 2 A34 BLEACHERS A-5 440 SF FIXED 125 2 POOL DECK EGRESS: 4 10,207 SF 589 OCCUPANCY SCHEDULE Number Name OCC Class Area Occupany Load Factor OLF Type Occupant Load # Exits BUILDING ONLY EGRESS A1 LOBBY B 1,880 SF 15.0 NSF 126 2 A27 ACTIVITY ROOM A-3 753 SF 15.0 NSF 51 2 A3 CORRIDOR 312 SF 0.0 N/A A5 FAMILY CHANGING 96 SF 0.0 N/A A6 ADULT CHANGING 178 SF 0.0 N/A A23 RESTROOM 97 SF 0.0 N/A A20 RESTROOM 69 SF 0.0 N/A A25 STAFF SHOWER 40 SF 0.0 N/A A2 WOMEN'S LOCKER B 835 SF 50.0 GSF 17 1 A7 MEN'S LOCKER B 802 SF 50.0 GSF 17 1 A4 JANITOR STORAGE S-2 255 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A8 IDF S-2 144 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A9 TRASH S-2 185 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A11 ACID S-2 68 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A14 POOL MECH S-2 2,006 SF 300.0 GSF 7 1 A19 OFFICE B 143 SF 150.0 GSF 1 1 A21 LIFE GUARD B 221 SF 150.0 GSF 2 1 A22 OFFICE B 120 SF 150.0 GSF 1 1 A28 WOMEN'S LOCKER B 562 SF 50.0 GSF 12 1 A29 MEN'S LOCKER B 568 SF 50.0 GSF 12 1 N1 NATATORIUM A-3 5,300 SF 50.0 GSF 107 2 A13 ELEC S-2 281 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A12 CHLORINE S-2 87 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A10 FIRE RISER S-2 65 SF 300.0 GSF 1 1 A15 POOL STORAGE S-2 462 SF 300.0 GSF 2 1 A30 INDOOR POOL DECK A-3 2,379 SF 15.0 GSF 159 2 BUILDING ONLY EGRESS: 26 17,907 SF 521 3+ 329** REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION239 COVER AND PROJECT NOTES C001 (N)NORTH (S)SOUTH LP LOW POINT HV HIGH VOLTAGE SIDEWALKSDWK CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCCG 1/2 PT HALF POINT OF CURB RETURN AT F/C FUTURE(F) DOMESTIC WATERDW BM BLDG, B BOV CMP CO CONC (E) EVC FF FG FT BENCH MARK BUILDING BLOWOFF VALVE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CLEANOUT CONCRETE EAST END VERTICAL CURVE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE FEET HIGH POINT MINIMUM MANHOLE MONUMENT NUMBER PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN EASEMENT POINT HP MIN MH MON NO, # PRC PSDE PT GRADE BREAKGB R RADIUS BEGIN CURB RETURNBCR BW, B/W BACK OF WALK CURB RETURNCR DRAWINGDWG ELECTRICE ECR END OF CURB RETURN ELEVATIONEL, ELEV FACE OF CURBF/C, FC FINISHED PAVEMENTFP GRD GRADE JP JOINT POLE NTS NOT TO SCALE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE or PG&E PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC PR, PROP PROPOSED STREETST T, TEL TELEPHONE TG TOP OF GRATE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT TYPICALTYP VERTICALVERT WATER METERWM WV WATER VALVE (W)WEST WITHW/ LAT LATERAL DWY DRIVEWAY PL PROPOSED LINE T&B TOP AND BOTTOM DIAMETERDIA PAE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT HUB & TACKH&T CATV CABLE TELEVISION I(CO)CLEANOUT INVERT ELEVATION PUBLIC SERVICE UTILITY EASEMENTPSUE TOP OF WALLTW UG UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CATCH BASINSDCB STREET LIGHT BOXSLB CURVE NUMBERC1 LENGTHL PAVEMENTPAV, PVMT SP SIGN POST CI CURB INLET DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL AB AC BC FL AGGREGATE BASE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BEGIN OF CURVE FLOW LINE STORM DRAINSD CENTERLINEC, C/L, CL EDGE OF PAVEMENT STA STATION E/P, EP SS SANITARY SEWER LINEAL FEETLF HYDRAULIC GRADE LINEHGL RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE GASG INVERT ELEVATIONIE, INV CATCH BASINCB WATER, WATERLINEW GR GRATE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBTC MAX MAXIMUM POLYVINYL CHLORIDEPVC STORM DRAIN MANHOLESDMH SHEETSH, SHT RIGHTRT RIGHT-OF-WAYR/W LEFTLT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLESSMH SLOPES END OF CURVEEC BLOWOFFBO TEMPORARYTEMP END OF VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION END OF VERTICAL CURVE STATION EVCE EVCS VERTICAL CURVEVC POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTIONPVI RW RECLAIMED WATER IRRIGATIONIRR RIM ELEVATIONRIM AIR RELEASE VALVEARV FIRE HYDRANTFH ADJ AGG ADJUST AGGREGATE DUCTILE IRON PIPEDIP L TRAFFIC INDEXTI POTABLE WATERPW PERFORATED PIPEPP FS FINISHED SURFACE PIV POST INDICATOR VALVE FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FS FIRE SERVICE EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTE.A.E. WET STANDPIPEWSP REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPALRPP BACKFLOW PREVENTERBFP JPL JOINT POLE WITH LIGHT JT JOINT TRENCH OVERHEAD ELECTRICALOHE & T CP CATHODIC PROTECTION DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERET AND TELEPHONE PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE SEWER MAIN INVERT ELEVATIONI(M) FIBER OPTICSFO EGCL EXISTING GROUND AT CENTERLINE EXISTINGEX LIP OF GARAGELOG EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESSEVA LIP OF GUTTERLG GRND GROUND ELEVATION SWL SWALE EDGE OF WALKEOW SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STORM DRAIN LINESDLI OVERHEADOH FW FIRE WATER ON CENTEROC STANDARDSTD SW SIDEWALK SOUTHEAST (SW) (SE) SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC BOXEB ELECTRIC VAULTEV FAB FIRE ALARM BOX GP GUARD POLE COM COMMUNICATION EXTS EXISTING TOP OF SLAB HC HANDICAPPED INV INVERT TS TOP OF SLAB WATER BOXWB SMY SMALL MANAGEMENT YARD BOT BOTTOM OF BOX COR CORNER PB PULL BOX STORM DRAIN AREA DRAINSDAD (NE) (NW) NORTHEAST NORTHWEST COL BUILDING COLUMN HANDICAP RAMPHCR EDGE OF TRAVEL WALKETW AD AREA DRAIN VALLEY GUTTERVG STORM DRAIN CLEANOUTSDCO ABBREVIATIONS: ROUGH GRADERG GENERAL NOTES: 1.ARRANGE FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS BY CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE. NO DELAY OF WORK CLAIM WILL BE ALLOWED DUE TO CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO ARRANGE FOR REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS IN ADVANCED. PROVIDE NOTICE TO CITY ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 2.REVISIONS TO THESE PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY ENGINEER, WHO WILL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF AFFECTED ITEMS. REVISIONS SHALL BE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON REVISED PLANS, WHICH SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 3.REPLACED OR REPAIR EXISTING UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS OR FEATURES DAMAGED, REMOVED, OR DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, WHETHER SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOT. 4.REPLACE STREET MONUMENTS, LOT CORNERS PIPES AND OTHER PERMANENT MONUMENTS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET BY A SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 5.IMPLEMENT CONSTRUCTION DUST CONTROL MEASURES TO REDUCE PARTICULATE GENERATION TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL. PROVIDE DUST CONTROL IN CONFORMANCE WITH BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. 6.SHOULD IT APPEAR THAT THE WORK IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED OR SPECIFIED IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ENGINEER AND OBTAIN CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK IN QUESTION. 7.CONSTRUCTION STAKING SHALL BE DONE BY A CIVIL ENGINEER OR LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 8.MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, ADJACENT LANDSCAPE AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITH SMOOTH TRANSITION TO AVOID ABRUPT OR APPARENT CHANGES IN GRADES, CROSS SLOPES, LOW SPOTS OR HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. 9.PROTECT ADJOINING PREMISES, TREES, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, STREETS AND OTHER FEATURES FROM DAMAGE BY CONTRACTOR'S OPERATION. REPAIR, REPLACE OR CLEAN ADJOINING PREMISES, TREES, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, STREETS AND OTHER FEATURES TO SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 10.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS AND LICENSES AS REQUIRED TO PERFORM WORK WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PRIOR TO START OF WORK. PERMITS MAY INCLUDE CITY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR WORK IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY AND GRADING PERMIT. 11.WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2022 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE. EXISTING CONDITIONS: 1.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY DATED SEPTEMBER 2022 BY BKF ENGINEERS. CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN. REVIEW CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS TO UNDERSTAND AND VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE. 2.EXISTING SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE TAKEN FROM RECORD INFORMATION KNOWN TO THE ENGINEER AND FIELD SURVEY OF ABOVE GRADE FEATURES. THESE PLANS ARE NOT MEANT TO BE A FULL CATALOG OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. CONDUCT FIELD INVESTIGATION TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOT, PRIOR TO START OF EXCAVATION. IF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THERE PLANS ARE DISCOVERED, NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY AND REQUEST DISCREPANCY BE RESOLVED. 3.VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION AFFECTING UTILITIES. POTHOLE WHERE NEEDED TO VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. 4.CONTACT USA (UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT) AT 1-800-227-2600, AND AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK TO REQUEST UTILITIES TO BE MARKED. UTILITIES: 1.NOTIFY PG&E A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. IF EXISTING ELECTRIC, GAS OR OTHER UTILITY SERVICES ARE DISTURBED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY UTILITY OWNER IMMEDIATELY. 2.PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONTRACTOR'S WORK. DRAWING LANGUAGE: 1.NOTES AND CALLOUTS ON DRAWINGS MAY BE IMPERATIVE LANGUAGE. REQUIREMENTS EXPRESSED IMPERATIVELY ARE TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. RECORD DRAWINGS: 1.KEEP ACCURATE RECORD OF THE FINAL LOCATION, ELEVATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON A COPY OF THE FINAL APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. NOTE THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ENCOUNTERED THAT VARY FROM THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. PROVIDE COPY OF RECORD INFORMATION TO OWNER AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT AND WHEN REQUESTED. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY: 1.CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD BOTH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF EITHER THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RESPECTIVELY. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES: 1.THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE AND THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. CITY NOTES: 1.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED AND MAINTAINED IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER AND APPEARANCE. 2.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SITE PLAN SHOWING PLACEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS AND SHALL AGREE TO ABIDE BY ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REQUIRED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. 3.BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT, POSTING THE REQUIRED BONDS AND INSURANCE. 4.SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT BY THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION AND PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PERTAINING TO ON-SITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, GRADING, OR PAVING OR ANY WORK IN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS IN ADVANCE. 5.ALL EXCESS FILL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDING DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OUTSIDE THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. 6.THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/EMID CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMITS. 7.PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REPLACE TO CITY STANDARDS ANY STREETS, CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. 8.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 8 AM TO 5 PM ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS DEVIATIONS FROM THIS SCHEDULE ARE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE CITY. NON-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MAY TAKE PLACE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7 AM AND 8 AM ON WEEKDAYS AND 9 AM AND 4 PM ON SATURDAYS BUT MUST BE LIMITED TO QUIET ACTIVITIES AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE USE OF ENGINE-DRIVEN MACHINERY. NO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MAY TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 7 AM AND 8 AM, EXCEPT WHEN POST-TENSION SLAB FOUNDATIONS ARE BEING POURED, THE CONCRETE PUMPER MAY BE SET UP BUT NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED. FORKLIFTS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO OPERATE ONSITE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 5 PM AND 6:30 PM ON WEEKDAYS. THE PROJECT MANAGER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RESCIND THIS CONDITION AND FURTHER RESTRICT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE EVENT THAT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE ARE NOT PROTECTED DUE TO NOISE LEVELS EMANATING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. 9.IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS, ALL ENGINE-DRIVEN CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND PNEUMATIC TOOLS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO USE EFFECTIVE INTAKE AND EXHAUST MUFFLERS; EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY ADJUSTED AND MAINTAINED; ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH MUFFLERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA STANDARDS. 10.BLOWING DUST SHALL BE REDUCED BY TIMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SO THAT PAVING AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION BEGIN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING, AND BY LANDSCAPING DISTURBED SOILS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. FURTHER, WATER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE SUBJECT TO BLOWING DUST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL OF BLOWING DUST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. WATERING ON PUBLIC STREETS SHALL NOT OCCUR. STREETS WILL BE CLEANED BY STREET SWEEPERS OR BY HAND AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE. WATERING ASSOCIATED WITH ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8 AM AND 7 PM AND SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE-LATE AFTERNOON WATERING TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS OF BLOWING DUST. ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND MEDIANS SOILED OR LITTERED DUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CLEANED AND SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS DURING THE WORKWEEK TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. 11.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S REGISTERED ENGINEER SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE, IN WRITING, AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ALL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PROPOSED WORK AND THE DESIGN INDICATED ON ON THE PLANS. ANY PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY BEFORE ALTERED WORK IS STARTED. ANY APPROVED CHANGES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS. 12.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE QUALIFIED SUPERVISION ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 13.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE CITY/DISTRICT CODES. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES SHALL BE OBSERVED AT ALL TIMES DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. SUPERINTENDENCE OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DILIGENTLY PERFORMED BY A PERSON OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO DO SO AT ALL TIMES DURING WORKING HOURS. THE STORING OF GOODS AND/OR MATERIALS ON THE SIDEWALK AND/OR THE STREET WILL NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS A SPECIAL PERMIT IS ISSUED BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. 14.PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP AN EARTH MOVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED SOILS ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. 15.PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ACKNOWLEDGE IN WRITING THAT THEY HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PROJECT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PARTICULARLY THOSE PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND SITE SAFETY, AND WILL MAKE CERTAIN THAT ALL PROJECT SUBCONTRACTORS HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THEM PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND THAT A COPY OF THE PROJECT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WILL BE POSTED ONSITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 16.PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK OR THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT OR BUILDING MATERIALS ON THE SITE, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT A TEMPORARY FENCE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS AND LOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED. THIS FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE AS APPROVED UNTIL THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL ALLOW IT TO BE REMOVED OR CHANGED. THE FENCE MAY ONLY BE EXPANDED OR CONTRACTED IN SIZE UPON APPROVAL OF THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THIS CONDITION OF APPROVAL SHALL RESULT IN THE PERMIT BEING BROUGHT TO THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR ITS REVIEW AND INTRODUCTION OF STRICTER SITE AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS. 17.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUIRE ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO OBTAIN ANY PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. 18.CURRENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS OUTLINED BY THE SAN MATEO COUNTY STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM SHALL BE FOLLOWED. 19.PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SUBMITTED IN WRITING, WHICH INDICATES THE INTENT AND GUARANTEES THAT SILT AND RUN-OFF WILL REMAIN ON SITE, SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. 20.IN ORDER TO ASSURE PUBLIC SAFETY AND MINIMIZE THE UNATTRACTIVE SHORT TERM ASPECTS OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, PLANS SHALL INCLUDE SITE CONTROL INFORMATION WHICH, AT A MINIMUM PROVIDES THAT A 6 (SIX) FOOT TALL CHAIN-LINK FENCE (NO PORTION OF WHICH CONTAINS BARBED WIRE) WITH A DARK GREEN (OR OTHER COLOR APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR) VINYL OR CANVAS INTERIOR LINER PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND ANY YARD OR ANY PORTION OF A YARD WHICH THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL IDENTIFY AS REQUIRING SUCH. 21.ALL REQUIRED FENCING SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK ON SITE, SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE FOR SUCH TIME AS REQUIRED BY THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL AND SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT. THE GATE TO THE FENCE SHALL BE LOCKED AT ALL TIMES THAT THE FENCED AREA IS LEFT UNATTENDED BY EITHER THE OWNER OR RESIDENT, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS. ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING TEMPORARY OR PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS GENERATORS, STORAGE CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES, SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE FENCED AREA WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT OCCURRING. IF PLACED ANYWHERE ON SITE, PORTABLE TOILETS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE FENCED AREA AT ALL TIMES. 22.ALL VEHICLES HAULING MATERIALS TO THE PROJECT SITE THAT EXCEED 12,000 POUNDS GROSS WEIGHT SHALL FOLLOW ESTABLISHED TRUCK ROUTE STREETS TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE JOB SITE UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER OR APPROVED DESIGNEE. EARTHWORK AND GRADING: 23.PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 4216, UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) SHALL BE CONTACTED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO EARTH WORK ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE. IN ADDITION TO CONTACTING USA, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE PROJECT SITE. 24.SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT BY THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION AND PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PERTAINING TO ON-SITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, GRADING, OR PAVING, OR ANY WORK IN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE. 1.FILL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NINYO & MOORE, DATED APRIL 11, 2023. 2.TOPSOIL, ROOTS, VEGETABLE MATTER, TRASH AND DEBRIS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIAL. 3.REMOVE DEBRIS FROM AREAS OF EARTHWORK PRIOR TO PLACING FILL OR STARTING GRADING OPERATIONS. 4.PLACE AND COMPACT FILL MATERIAL AS RECOMMENDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NINYO & MOORE, DATED APRIL 11, 2023: PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN MAXIMUM 8 INCH UNCOMPACTED THICKNESS. COMPACTION BY FLOODING, PONDING OR JETTING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 5.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THEIR OWN DETERMINATION OF EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. 6.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY AND ALL REQUIRED PERMITS FOR OFFSITE WORK CONDUCTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT SITE SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION240 60013 2 6 . 5 2 0 2 C L MH 2 4 .70 0 3 B I K E T I P SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONSLEGEND SURVEY NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS C100 1" = 30'scale 30 0 30 feet 60 ORANGE AVENUE AMBERWOOD CIRCLE EUCALYPTUS AVENUE TENNIS DR SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION241 TENNIS DR IVE ORANGE AVENUE LOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOW LOW LOW PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE (FFE 26.25) RG PAD 19.60 RG PAD 17.90 RG PAD 15.25 SUBBASE RG 24.83 RG PAD 21.50 OUTDOOR POOL SUBBASE RG 21.20 INDOOR POOL SUBBASE RG 18.58 SUBBASE RG 25.25RG PAD 22.60(FFE 26.25)SUBBASE RG 18.26RG PAD 15.60(FFE 26.25) SUBBASE RG 24.83 RG PAD 21.50 SUBBASE RG 22.26 SUBBASE RG 25.81RG PAD 23.15(FFE XX.XX) PAD XX.XX ROUGH GRADING PLAN C3001" = 20'scale 20 0 20 feet 40 ORANGE AVENUETENNIS DR SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION242 ROUGH GRADING SECTIONS C301 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION243 TENNIS DR IVE ORANGE AVENUE SD LOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOW LOW LOW PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C302 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/2022 PRICING SET 2 12/15/2022 100% SD 3 4/3/2023 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/2023 100% DD 1" = 20'scale 20 0 20 feet 40 ORANGE AVENUETENNIS DR 60% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS JUNE 15, 2023 5 6/15/2023 60% CD 4/17/2023 100% DD SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET SEE LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN (L200) FORGRADING IN THIS AREASEE LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN (L200) FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA SEE LANDSCAPE GRAD INGPLAN (L200 ) FOR GRAD ING INTHIS AREA SEE POOL DECK PLAN SHEET DP-1 FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION244 SD 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 13 14 15 ORANGE AVENUEVCPLOW LOW OUTDOOR POOL DECK POOL STORAGE EXISTING PLAYGROUND : 0.32 AC PROPOSED UP TO 0.6 AC 65 7 s q f t378 sq f t 172 sq f tEVEVEVNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGTENNIS DR IVE ORANGE AVENUE LOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOW LOW LOW PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE SD SITE UTILITY PLAN C400 1" = 20'scale 20 0 20 feet 40MATCHLINE AMATCHLINE AORANGE AVENUETENNIS DR SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION245 LOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOW LOW LOW PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE EVEVEVNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGLEGEND VEHICULAR ASPHALT CONCRETE (DRIVE AISLE AND FIRE LANE) 1,246 SQ FT VEHICULAR ASPHALT CONCRETE (PARKING STALLS) 4,500 SQ FT VEHICULAR CONCRETE 2,931 SQ FT GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL NEW ROADWAY SURFACES OR FIRE LANES SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING CONTINUOUS SERVICE FOR VEHICLES WITH A GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT OF 68,000 LBS. 2.PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS BEING BROUGHT ONTO THE SITE, DESIGNATED ROADWAYS SURFACES OR FIRE LANES SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING CONTINUOUS SERVICE FOR VEHICLES WITH A GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT OF 68,000 LBS. 3.ALL SIGNS AND SIGN CODE REFERENCES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) EDITION 2014 4.SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR HARDSCAPE PAVING LAYOUT AND DETAILS 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY STRIPING THAT IS DAMAGED OR LOST DUE TO TRENCHING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. REFER TO SHEET C-601 FOR TEMPORARY STRIPING FOR TENNIS DRIVE PARKING LOT TO MAINTAIN ADA ACCESS TO EXISTING BUILDING WHILE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUILDING IS ONGOING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN C600 1 2 3 4 1" = 20'scale 20 0 20 feet 40 4 ORANGE AVENUETENNIS DR 5 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION246 OUTDOOR POOL DECK POOL STORAGE EVEVEVNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOW LOW LOW LOW LOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOW LOW LOW PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INEPROPERTY L INE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE 1" = 20'scale 20 0 20 feet 40 ORANGE AVENUETENNIS DR 200' HOSE REACH200' HOSE REACH200' HOSE REACH120' HOSE REACH 200' HOSE REACH SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/22 PRICING SET 2 12/15/22 100% SD 3 4/3/23 50% DD PRICING SET 4 4/17/23 100% DD 5 6/15/23 60% CD 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94080 6 8/24/23 PERMIT SET FIRE ACCESS PLAN C900PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION247 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23EXISTINGCONDITIONAERIALL0000204060PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 248 NATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYEVEV EVNO PARKI NG NO PARKIN G NO PARKIN G SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23ILLUSTRATIVEPLANL0010204060PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 249 SDNATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYEVEV EVNO PARKI NG NO PARKIN G NO PARKIN G SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23LAYOUT PLANL1000204060PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 250 PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 251 PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 252 PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 253 NATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYORANGE AVENUEORANGE AVENUERAILROAD AVENUECIRCLE COURTTENNIS DRIVEEVEV EVNO PARKI NG NO PARKIN G NO PARKIN G FFE 26.25FFE26.2526.1726.0626.061.3%1.7%2625252525252526262626262626254.5%24.6(25.55)(25.48)(25.11)25.97(TC 24.98)(25.4)(25.5)(25.7)(26.64)(TC 26.20)LP 24.326LP 23.9(25.7)(25.6)[25.8](25.8)(TC 25.15)(TC 25.11)(TC 24.67)(0.4%)[TC 25.00][BC 24.50]26272627LP 24 .91%26.23HP 28 .06HP 28.06FFE 26.2526.23(25.26)25.8FFE26.2526.23FFE26.2526.2326.0626.1325.6225.454.5%26.0626.2326.13(0.7%)[BR 25.32][TC 25.33]1.7%TC 26.39BC 25.89TC 26.13BC 25.63[TC 26.02][TC 25.86]4.5%TR 25.9026.1826.1025.2225.4925.1625.531.5%TW 27.60BW 25.33TW 27.60BW 25.1025.8425.2925.36(25.5)[25.50][25.49]25.791.7%(25.06)25.791.7%25.2255%25.061.7%24.8926.233.6%25.961.7%26.061.5%25.9825.4325.2025.3225.190.5 %TW 26.59BW 25.09(TC 26.34)(TC 26.19)(0.3%)3.3%TR 26.08TW 27.60BW 25.20TW 27.60BW 25.15TW 26.59BW 25.14TC/BC 26.12(0.4%)TC/BC 26.041%5.1%BR 25.44TR 26.08TC 26.26BC 25.7625.0124.95[TC 25.90]TC 25.84TR 25.9726.03TC/BC 25.97TC/BC 26.0126.0725.1625.1025.6(TC 25.05)(TC 24.99)1.5%26.0625.8825.92(25.03)[25.09](25.5)(25.5)(25.6)TW 29.064:1TW 29.064:1TWTCTRBCBR(26.4)(25.5)(25.5)(25.5)(27.0)(27.2)(27.1)(27.1)(27.7)25.651.7%26.0925.40BW2625BR 24.365%26.135%5%5%(TC 24.77)TR 24.90(TC 24.89)(24.97)(1.3%)(0.2%)TC 24.77(CB 24.13)TR 24.8626.225.925.225.925.225.925.225.9(25.34)(25.30)(25.90)(25.89)TC 25.79BC 25.29TC 25.75BC 25.25SDSHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23GRADING PLANL2000204060PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 254 NATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYEVEV EVGVEEEEEEE-7E-6E-5E-4E-3E-2E-1EEEGVGVEBMVFS252525 252525252525252525251818182525SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23IRRIGATION PLANL300fax 925.932.5671tel 925.939.3985www.rmairrigation.com2760 Camino DiabloWalnut Creek, CA 94597tRussell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.Irrigation Consultant:IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C". MOUNT ON INTERIOR WALLWITHIN UTILITY ROOM AS DETAILED AND AS DIRECTED BYARCHITECT. CONNECT TO 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL SERVICEINSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATIONOF ELECTRICAL SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.41PLAN NOTES LEGENDNOTES:1.ONE BUBBLER SYMBOL IS SHOWN AT TREES FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY.INSTALL MINIMUM TWO BUBBLERS AT EACH TREE. INSTALL REQUIRED NUMBER OFBUBBLERS AS DETAILED.2.IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHICCLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS.IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALLBE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVINGSIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALLPIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL ELECTRICALCONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12"MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE.3.UNSIZED LATERAL LINE PIPING LOCATED DOWN STREAM OF 1" PIPING SHALL BE3/4" IN SIZE (TYPICAL).4.SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:0.75"0-6 GPM1"7-12 GPM1.25"13-20 GPM1.5"21-32 GPM2"33-50 GPM5.SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE FOR DRIPLINE (12" O.C. GRID WITH 0.6 GPH OR LESSEMITTERS) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:0.750-500 FT1"501-1100 FT1.25"1101-2000 FT1.5"2001-3000 F812222267598EXISTING GATE VALVE THAT PROVIDES WATER TO THEEXISTING PARK.2POT HOLE AND LOCATE EXISTING LATERAL LINE. CAP PIPE ATTHIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION.333333REPLACE SPRINKLER WITH NEW I-40-06-SS-15. ADJUST ARCPATTERN TO ELIMINATE SPRAY ONTO NEW BUILDINGPOT HOLE AND LOCATE EXISTING 6" A.C. MAIN LINE. CUT OUTA SECTION OF PIPE TO INSTALL NEW TEE PER DETAIL.45EXISTING VALVES AND MAIN LINE TO BE PROTECTED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING IRRIGATION NOTES:1.EXISTING IRRIGATION IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND IS BASED ON OLD IRRIGATIONAS-BUILD PLANS AND/OR SITE VISIT. EXACT ROUTING OF IRRIGATION MAINLINE, WIRES,LOCATION OF REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, AND IRRIGATED AREAS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATEDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALLEXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AND THE WORKING CONDITIONS PRIOR OF CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.2.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO KEEP ALL EXISTING PLANTING AREAS (TO REMAIN) WITHWATER AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE PROVIDING TEMPORARYWATER SOURCE AND TEMPORARY IRRIGATION DURING CONSTRUCTION.6POT HOLE AND LOCATE EXISTING MAIN LINE THAT SERVICESPLANTING AROUND THE BUILDING. CAP ON DISCHARGE SIDEOF VALVE.7APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING LOW VOLTAGEWIRES THAT SERVICES ALL VALVES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THEROAD. ROUTE 9 (7 CONTROL, 1 COMMON, 1 EXTRA)CONTROL WIRES FROM NEW CONTROLLER TO THISLOCATION. SPLICE INTO EXISTING WIRES AT THIS LOCATION.LOCATE ALL SPLICES WITHIN RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX.9POT HOLE AND LOCATE EXISTING MAIN LINE AT THISAPPROXIMATE LOCATION. CONNECT NEW 2" MAIN LINE TOEXISTING AT THIS APPROXIMATE LOCATION. ASSUMED PIPE ISGALVANIZED OR A.C. USE HYMAX OR EQUAL REPAIRCOUPLING TO CONNECT NEW PIPE.2333PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 255 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23IRRIGATIONLEGEND ANDNOTESL301fax 925.932.5671tel 925.939.3985www.rmairrigation.com2760 Camino DiabloWalnut Creek, CA 94597tRussell D. Mitchell Associates, Inc.Irrigation Consultant:1.THESE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ANDINDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. ALL PIPING, VALVES,AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS MAY BE SHOWN WITHINPAVED AREAS FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY AND ARE TO BEINSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. DUE TO THE SCALE OF THEDRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS,FITTINGS, SLEEVES, CONDUIT, AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH MAY BEREQUIRED. INVESTIGATE THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHEDCONDITION AFFECTING THE CONTRACT WORK INCLUDINGOBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR AREA DIMENSIONALDIFFERENCES. IN THE EVENT OF FIELD DISCREPANCY WITHCONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLAN THE INSTALLATION WORKACCORDINGLY BY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THEOWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ACCORDING TO THECONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. NOTIFY AND COORDINATEIRRIGATION CONTRACT WORK WITH APPLICABLE CONTRACTORSFOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE, CONDUIT ORSLEEVES THROUGH OR UNDER WALLS, ROADWAYS, PAVING ANDSTRUCTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT THESENOTIFICATIONS ARE NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTORASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REQUIRED REVISIONS.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,STANDARDS, AND REGULATIONS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALSSHALL BE IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST RULES ANDREGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE UNIFORMPLUMBING CODE, PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN PLUMBINGOFFICIALS ASSOCIATION; AND OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAWS ORREGULATIONS. NOTHING IN THESE DRAWINGS IS TO BECONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESECODES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISHWITHOUT ANY EXTRA CHARGE, ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL ANDLABOR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE CODESAND REGULATIONS.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OFIRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF THEPLANT MATERIALS TO INSURE THAT THERE WILL BE COMPLETE ANDUNIFORM IRRIGATION COVERAGE OF PLANTING IN ACCORDANCEWITH THESE DRAWINGS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THEIRRIGATION LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CONTRACTORAND OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE IF ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, ORADDITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED AND TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTMATERIAL.4.THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THEMINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOODPLANT HEALTH.5.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORAND/OR OWNER TO PROGRAM THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S)TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER NEEDED TOSUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. THIS INCLUDES MAKINGADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROGRAM FOR SEASONAL WEATHERCHANGES, PLANT MATERIAL, WATER REQUIREMENTS, MOUNDS,SLOPES, SUN, SHADE AND WIND EXPOSURE.6.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORTO PROVIDE 120 VOLT A.C. (2.5 AMP DEMAND PER CONTROLLER)ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION(S). IT IS THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE STUB-OUT TO THECONTROLLER(S). PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING PER CONTROLLERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHLOCAL CODES.7.PROVIDE EACH CONTROLLER WITH ITS OWN GROUND ROD.SEPARATE THE GROUND RODS BY A MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET. THEGROUND ROD SHALL BE AN EIGHT FOOT LONG BY 5/8" DIAMETERU.L. APPROVED COPPER CLAD ROD. INSTALL NO MORE THAN 6" OFTHE GROUND ROD ABOVE FINISH GRADE. CONNECT #6 GAUGEWIRE WITH A U.L. APPROVED GROUND ROD CLAMP TO ROD ANDBACK TO GROUND SCREW AT BASE OF CONTROLLER WITHAPPROPRIATE CONNECTOR. MAKE THIS WIRE AS SHORT ASPOSSIBLE, AVOIDING KINKS OR BENDING.8.INSTALL NEW BATTERIES IN THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S) TORETAIN PROGRAM IN MEMORY DURING TEMPORARY POWERFAILURES. USE QUANTITY, TYPE AND SIZE REQUIRED AS PERCONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.9.SCHEDULE A MEETING WHICH INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES OF THEIRRIGATION CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER, THE MAINTENANCECONTRACTOR, THE OWNER AND THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTORAT THE SITE FOR INSTRUCTION ON THE PROPER PROGRAMMINGAND OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER.10.INSTALL 3" DETECTABLE TAPE ABOVE ALL PRESSURIZED MAIN LINESAS DETAILED. USE CHRISTY MODEL #TA-DT-3-BIRR FOR POTABLEIRRIGATION SYSTEMS.11.PROVIDE EACH IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH ITS OWNINDEPENDENT LOW VOLTAGE COMMON GROUND WIRE.12.IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES: SOLID COPPER WITH U.L. APPROVALFOR DIRECT BURIAL IN GROUND. COMMON GROUND WIRE: SIZE#12-1 WIRE WITH A WHITE INSULATING JACKET. CONTROL WIRESERVICING REMOTE CONTROL VALVES: SIZE #14-1 WIRE WITHINSULATING JACKET OF COLOR OTHER THAN WHITE. SPLICESSHALL BE MADE WITH 3M-DBY SEAL PACKS OR APPROVED EQUAL.13.IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES: SOLID COPPER WITH U.L.APPROVAL FOR DIRECT BURIAL IN GROUND. CONTROL WIRESERVICING REMOTE CONTROL VALVES: SIZE #14-1 WIRE WITH AUNIQUE COLOR INSULATING JACKET FOR EACH CONTROLLER.COMMON GROUND WIRE: SIZE #12-1 WIRE WITH A WHITE IINSULATING JACKET AND A STRIPE OF COLOR WHICH MATCH'STHE CONTROL WIRE COLOR CHOICE FOR SPECIFIC CONTROLLER.SPARE WIRE: #14-1 WIRE WITH BLACK INSULATION JACKET.SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH 3M-DBR/Y-6 SEAL PACKS ORAPPROVED EQUAL.14.INSTALL TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES OF A DIFFERENT COLORALONG THE ENTIRE MAIN LINE. LOOP 36" EXCESS WIRE INTO EACHSINGLE VALVE BOX AND INTO ONE VALVE BOX IN EACH GROUPOF VALVES.15.INSTALL GREEN (TURF) OR BLACK (GROUNDCOVER) PLASTIC VALVEBOXES WITH BOLT DOWN, NON HINGED COVER MARKED"IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE". BOX BODY SHALL HAVE KNOCKOUTS. ACCEPTABLE VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER'S INCLUDE NDS,CARSON OR APPROVED EQUAL.16.INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES 12" FROM WALK, CURB,BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. AT MULTIPLE VALVE BOXGROUPS, INSTALL EACH BOX AN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THEWALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE AND PROVIDE 12"BETWEEN BOX TOPS. ALIGN THE SHORT SIDE OF RECTANGULARVALVE BOXES PARALLEL TO WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPEFEATURE.17.VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL INGROUND COVER/SHRUB AREAS (AVOID LAWN AREAS WHEREPOSSIBLE).18.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL CONTROL LINE WIRE AT EACHREMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 2 1/4" X 2 3/4" POLYURETHANEI.D. TAG, INDICATING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF VALVE(CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER). ATTACH LABEL TOCONTROL WIRE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERMANENTLY STAMPALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION ASNOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.19.FLUSH AND ADJUST IRRIGATION OUTLETS AND NOZZLES FOROPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ONTOWALKS, ROADWAYS, AND/OR BUILDINGS. SELECT THE BESTDEGREE OF THE ARC AND RADIUS TO FIT THE EXISTING SITECONDITIONS AND THROTTLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVETO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACHCONTROL ZONE.20.SET SPRINKLER HEADS PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE.21.LOCATE BUBBLERS ON UPHILL SIDE OF PLANT OR TREE.22.INSTALL A HUNTER HCV SERIES, KBI CV SERIES, OR APPROVEDEQUAL SPRING LOADED CHECK VALVE IN SPRINKLER RISERASSEMBLIES WHERE LOW OUTLET DRAINAGE WILL CAUSE EROSIONAND/OR EXCESS WATER.23.WHERE IT IS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTINGTREES, USE CAUTION TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AND TREEROOTS. EXCAVATE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH ANDLARGER ROOTS OCCUR. BACK FILL TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREEWITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE,SHADE THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH ADJACENT TO THE TREE WITH WETBURLAP OR CANVAS.24.NOTIFY LOCAL JURISDICTIONS FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING OFINSTALLED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.25.THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE MINIMUMOPERATING PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS.VERIFY WATER PRESSURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANYDIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WATER PRESSURE INDICATED ON THEDRAWINGS AND THE ACTUAL PRESSURE READING AT THEIRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.26.IRRIGATION DEMAND: REFER TO PLANS.27.THE EXISTING MAIN LINE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ISDIAGRAMMATIC. VERIFY AND LOCATE EXISTING MAIN LINE IN FIELD.REPORT TO ARCHITECT IN WRITING ANY DEVIATION OF EXISTINGMAIN LINE LOCATION FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.28.PIPE SIZING SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IS TYPICAL. AS CHANGESIN LAYOUT OCCUR DURING STAKING AND CONSTRUCTION THESIZE MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.29.PIPE THREAD SEALANT COMPOUND SHALL BE RECTOR SEAL #5.30.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MINORCHANGES IN THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT DUE TO OBSTRUCTIONSNOT SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS SUCH AS LIGHTS,FIRE HYDRANTS, SIGNS, ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURES, ETC.31.WHEN WORK OF THIS SECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SUCHOTHER TIMES AS MAY BE DIRECTED, REMOVE ALL TRASH, DEBRIS,SURPLUS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FROM SITE.32.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL HANDWATERING OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN DRIPLINE AREAS UNTILTHE PLANTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY ESTABLISHED.33.VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL IRRIGATION COMPONENTS INSTALLEDWITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION. DO NOT INSTALL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPROVIDES ACCEPTABLE LOCATIONS.IRRIGATION NOTESPCB-25SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE. COVER TO BE ASINDICATED IN SPECIFICATIONS OR AS INDICATEDABOVE FOR PIPE DEPTH OF COVER.3/4" AND LARGER:1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITHSCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.12" COVER.REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (IN INCHES)LATERAL LINE:SLEEVING:FLOW (GPM)CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER570-DRIP-INDTORO POP-UP DRIPLINE INDICATOR WITH SIDE INLET.T-YD-500-34TORO DRIPLINE AIR RELIEF VALVEWLT-0500-TNDS SCH 40 BALL VALVE OR APPROVED EQUALCONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBERAREA (SQ. FT.)FLOW (GPM)REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (IN INCHES)2" THROUGHOUT:1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITHSCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.18" COVER.MAIN LINE:ASSOCIATED REMOTE CONTROL VALVEASSOCIATED REMOTE CONTROL VALVEDRIP ZONE:TORO DL2000 SERIES DRIPLINE WITH DL2000 INSERTFITTINGS, PART #RGP-212. TUBING TO BE INSTALLED4" BELOW GRADE IN A 12" O.C. GRID ACCORDING TODETAILS. SIZE EXHAUST HEADERS AS FOLLOWS: 1":0-10 GPM, 1.25": 11-20 GPM. ALL EXHAUST HEADERSSHALL BE 1" SCH 40 PVC OR 1" SCH 40 FLEXIBLE PVC.USE SCH. 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS. EXTENDPVC HEADERS TO THE ENDS OF ALL DRIP ZONES TOBALANCE FLOW IF REQUIRED. SEE DETAILS FORFURTHER INFORMATION.DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE3/4" AND LARGER:1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITHSCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS.12" COVER.DRIPLINELATERAL LINE:ALL PIPE SHALL BE PURPLE IN COLOR WITH LABELINGAPPROVED FOR USE WITH RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS.NOTE:44-LRCRAIN BIRD 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (YELLOW LOCKINGRUBBER COVER)T113-K SERIESNIBCO BRASS GATE VALVE (LINE SIZE)-2.5" AND SMALLERHUNTER BUBBLER (TREE)MIN. 2 PER TREE. REFER TOBUBBLER DETAIL FORQUANTITY OF BUBBLERSPER TREE SIZE.0.25TRICKLE30XCZ-100-PRB-COMRAIN BIRD REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DRIP ZONE KIT WITH SCRUBBERVALVE. (3-20GPM)RAIN BIRD REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH SCRUBBER MECHANISMPESB-R SERIESF-619-RWS-SONNIBCO FLANGED GATE VALVE (LINE SIZE)-3" AND LARGER.SUPPLYHEADEREXHAUSTHEADERDRIP ZONEEXTENTSPVC LATERALIRRIGATION LEGENDSYMBOLOPERATINGPSIDESCRIPTIONNOZZLEGPMOPERATINGRADIUS (FEET)MODEL NUMBER3300200SUPERIOR MASTER VALVE-2" (NORMALLY OPEN) INSTALL 2 #14 GAUGEWIRES (1) BLUE, (1) WHITE FROM MASTER VALVE TO CONTROLLER. USE 3MSCOTCHLOC 3570G-N SPLICE KITS ON WIRE CONNECTIONS.FM1.5UCALSENSE ULTRA SONIC 1.5" PVC FLOW SENSOR. INSTALL 2 #14 GAUGEWIRES (1) BLACK, (1) RED FROM FLOW METER TO CONTROLLER. USE 3MSCOTCHLOC 3570G-N SPLICE KITS ON WIRE CONNECTIONS.CS3-48-WM1/CS3-GR-BUNDLE-2CALSENSE CS3000 48 STATION CONTROLLER IN A STAINLESS STEEL WALLMOUNT ENCLOSURE; INCLUDES STUBBY ANTENNA AND 4G LTECOMMUNICATION WITH A 10-YEAR DATA PLAN.INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT CALSENSE JENNIFERGREGORIS (925) 325-9368 JENNIFERG@CALSENSE.COM TO REQUEST ACALSENSE SITE REVIEW TO WHAT WAS SPECIFIED IS INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. MVFSE--EXISTING REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO REMAIN IN SERVICE--EXISTING GATE VALVE TO REMAIN IN SERVICEGV1.474016-18HUNTER POP-UPSPRAY SPRINKLERWITH MP ROTATORNOZZLE (TURF)PROS-06-PRS40-CV/MP2000-360252525182.03.8220-25HUNTER POP-UP GEARDRIVEN ROTOR (TURF)HUNTER POP-UP GEARDRIVEN ROTOR (TURF)20-2545451.0HUNTER POP-UP GEARDRIVEN ROTOR (TURF)20-2545I-20-06/MPR-25I-20-06/MPR-25I-20-06/MPR-250.754012-14HUNTER POP-UP SPRAYSPRINKLER WITH MPROTATOR NOZZLE(SHRUB/GC)PROS-12-PRS40-CV/MP1000-3600.37,0.194012-14HUNTER POP-UP SPRAYSPRINKLER WITH MPROTATOR NOZZLE(SHRUB/GC)PROS-12-PRS40-CV/MP1000-900.78408-10HUNTER POP-UP SPRAYSPRINKLER WITH MPROTATOR NOZZLE(SHRUB/GC)PROS-12-PRS40-CV/MP800SR-3600.42,0.23408-10HUNTER POP-UP SPRAYSPRINKLER WITH MPROTATOR NOZZLE(SHRUB/GC)PROS-12-PRS40-CV/MP800SR-900.32,0.163010-12HUNTER POP-UP SPRAYSPRINKLER WITH MPROTATOR NOZZLE(SHRUB/GC)PROS-12-PRS30-CV/MP1000-90APPROXIMATE CONNECTION POINT BETWEENDRIPLINE TUBING AND PVC SUPPLY WHEN DRIPZONE IS LESS THAN 3 GPM AND NO PVCSUPPLY/EXHAUST HEADERS ARE NEEDED. REFER TODRIPLINE TUBING CONNECTION DETAIL FOR MOREINFORMATION.DRIPLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVEPVC LATERALPLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 256 NATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYEVEV EVNO PARKI NG NO PARKIN G NO PARKIN G SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23PLANTING PLANL4000204060SYMBOL TYPE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACINGPLANT LIST - UNDERSTORYLAWNSHRUBPLANTINGORNAMENTALGRASSESBUFFERPLANTINGSTORMWATERTREATMENTGRASSESEXISTING TREESTO REMAINDECIDUOUSCANOPY TREES36" BOXEVERGREENCANOPY TREESPALM TREEEXISTING TREETO REMOVEMETAL HEADERARCTOSTAPHYLOSDENSIFLORA'HOWARD MCMINN'FRANGULA CALIFORNICA'MOUND SAN BRUNO'LAVANDULA X HETEROPHYLLAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSPRUNUS CAROLINIANAJUNCUS PATENSLEYMUS CONDENSATUS80-10-10 (FESCUE-BLUE-RYE) MIXHOWARD MCMINN MANZANITACOFFEEBERRYSWEET LAVENDERDEERGRASSCAROLINA CHERRY LAURELCALIFORNIA GRAY RUSHCANYON PRINCE WILD RYESOD5 GAL5 GAL5 GAL5 GAL1 GAL15 GAL1 GAL1 GALNA30" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING30" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING30" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING30" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING24" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING36" O.C. TRIANG. SPACING18" O.C. SQUARE SPACING18" O.C. TRIANG. SPACINGSYMBOL TYPE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITYPLANT LIST - TREELONDON PLANE TREECOAST LIVE OAKINTERIOR LIVE OAKSTONE PINECANARY ISLANDDATE PALMSPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA'COLUMBIA'QUERCUS AGRIFOLIAQUERCUS WISLIZENIPINUS PINEAPHEONIX CANARIENSISEXISTING TREE TO REMOVE36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX30' HEIGHT(TRUNK)67116222PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 257 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23PLANTING LISTL401 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'HOWARD MCMINN' -- HOWARD MCMINN MANZANITAEVERGREEN CANOPY TREESLAWN SODORNAMENTAL GRASSESLAVANDULA X HETEROPHYLLA -- SWEET LAVENDERPRUNUS CAROLINIANA -- CAROLINA CHERRY LAURELPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'COLUMBIA' -- LONDON PLANE TREEPHOENIX CANARIENSIS -- CANARY ISLAND DATEJUNCUS PATENS -- CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSHLEYMUS CONDENSATUS -- CANYON PRINCE WILD RYESTORMWATER TREATMENT GRASSESSHRUB PLANTING (3FT)BUFFER PLANTING (6FT)MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS -- DEERGRASSQUERCUS AGRIFOLIA -- COAST LIVE OAKFRANGULA CALIFORNICA -- COFFEEBERRYPINUS PINEA -- STONE PINEDECIDUOUS CANOPY TREEICONIC PALM TREE80-10-10 (FESCUE-BLUE-RYE) MIXQUERCUS WISLIZENI -- INTERIOR LIVE OAKPLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 258 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23PLANTINGDETAILSL402PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 259 NATATORIUMOUTDOOR POOL DECKPOOL STORAGELOBBYEVEV EVNO PARKI NG NO PARKIN G NO PARKIN G SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23TREE SHADEL403LIMIT OF WORK AREA: 98,994 SQ FTHARDSCAPE AREA: 22,578 SQ FTTREE SHADED AREA ON HARDSCAPE: 8,932 SQ FTTREE SHADED PERCENTAGE OF HARDCAPE: 40%LANDSCAPE AREA: 33,671 SQ FTTREE SHADED AREA ON LANDCAPE: 15,824 SQ FTTREE SHADED PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPE: 47%PARKING LOT AREA: 4,817 SQ FTTREE SHADED AREA ON PARKING LOT: 2,663 SQ FTTREE SHADED PERCENTAGE OF PARKING LOT: 55%TREE SPECIES HEIGHT SPREAD SHADE OFFSET (IN 15 YEARS) (IN 15 YEARS)COAST LIVE OAK 35' TALL 35' WIDE 13.6' OFFSETSTONE PINE 40' TALL 40' WIDE 15' OFFSETLONDON PLANE TREE 30' TALL 30' WIDE 11.6' OFFSETINTERIOR LIVE OAK 30' TALL 30' WIDE 11.6' OFFSETCANARY ISLAND DATE PALMS 30" TALL (TRUNK) 25' WIDE 9.6' OFFSETEXISTING TREE 16'-30' TALL 16'-30' WIDE 6'-11.6' OFFSET0204060PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 260 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23PAVING DETAILSL500PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 261 AASHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23FENCE, WALL, ANDSITE FURNISHINGDETAILSL501PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 262 DEDICATED TO VETERANS BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO“A NATION REVEALS ITSELF NOT ONLY BY THE MEN IT PRODUCESBUT ALSO BY THE MEN IT HONORS; THE MEN IT REMEMBERS”JOHN F. KENNEDY OCTOBER 26, 1963SHEET NUMBER:DATE:ISSUE:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT:CLIENT:ARCHITECT:ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN2040 Addison StreetBerkeley, CA 94704P: 510.549.2929CIVIL ENGINEER:BKF ENGINEERS4670 Willow Road, Suite 250Pleasanton, CA 94588P: (925) 396-7704LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:SWA2200 BridgewaySausalito, CA 94965P: 415.332.5100STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC.160 Pine Street, 6th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.837.0700MEP / FIRE PROTECTION:GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94111P: 415.655.4000AQUATICS:AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP2226 Faraday AvenueCarlsbad, CA 92008P: 760.438.8400SPECIFICATIONSTOPFLIGHT SPECS49 Geary Street, Suite 230San Francisco, CA 94108-5748P: 415.546.6033PROJECT TEAM:STAMP:PERMIT SETAUGUST 24, 2023CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCOORANGE MEMORIALPARK AQUATICCENTER1 W ORANGE AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080REVISIONNUMBERDATEDESCRIPTION3 31 258 24 23VETERANSMEMORIALDETAILL502PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 263 AHEADLANEBIKEXINGXINGPEDD O N O T E NTER PEDSTOPPED15XINGPROJECT FOOTPRINT TENNI S DRI VEORANGE AVE. EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 2.1 2.16 2.9 2.2 2.4 2.17 2.18 +/- 225' -0" DEMO (E) CHAINLINK FENCE 2.13 2.7 1. SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION SCOPE. 2. VERIFY CONDITIONS IN FIELD PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. BRING DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT TO OBTAIN RESOLUTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 3. REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING PARK APPURTENANCES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK. OWNER TO DETERMINE REUSE OR REMOVAL OF ITEMS. 4. PREPARE SITE PER GEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONS IN REPORT DATED DECEMBER 6, 2022 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND # STAMP: PERMIT SET DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A100 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN # DESCRIPTION 2.1 DEMO EXISTING NATATORIUM BUILDING FOLLOWING OPENING OF NEW NATATORIUM; SEE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY CLIENT 2.2 DEMO EXISTING PARKING LOT AND SURROUNDING LIGHT POLES; SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS 2.4 DEMO EXISTING SITE FEATURES. SALVAGE PLAQUES AND FLAG PER CITY REQUIREMENTS; SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS. 2.7 DEMO EXISTING FENCE 2.9 DEMO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 2.13 DEMOLISH (E) CHAIN-LINK BASEBALL BACKSTOP. RETURN SIGNAGE TO OWNER. 2.16 REMOVE (E) TREES, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR SCOPE/EXTENT 2.17 DEMOLISH (E) MONUMENT SIGN, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 2.18 REMOVE AND PROTECT EXISITNG STATUE FOR RELOCATION PLAN NORTH REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION264 EVEVEVNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGXINGPEDD O N O T EN TER STOPPEDXINGBIKELANE15STOPAHEADNATATORIUM OUTDOOR POOL DECK POOL STORAGE A201 1 A200 1 LOBBY ENTRY LIMIT OF WORK SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TENNI S DRI VEORANGE AVE. A105 1 26.5 G01 32.8 32.6 32.6 G02 G08 G03 G04 G05 G06 G07 102' - 7" G09 OPEN SPACE30' - 0"O P E N S P A C E30' - 0 "OPEN SPACE30' - 0"OPEN SPACE30' - 0"OPEN SPACE 30' - 0" 32.10 9.12 9.12 TENNI S DRI VE PARKI NG LOT (N.I .C.)PROPERTY LINE NEW PARKING LOT S.L.D. AND S.C.D.14' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 4"6' - 11"1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND # STAMP: PERMIT SET OVERALL SITE PLAN A101 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN # DESCRIPTION 9.12 RECESSED WALK OFF MAT 26.5 TRANSFORMER, S.E.D. 32.6 C.I.P. CONCRETE POOL DECK, SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS 32.8 ARTIFICIAL TURF 32.10 BICYCLE RACKS, S.L.D. PLAN NORTH 1.SEE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION265 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 2 1 A106 2 A106 3 A10632.1 32.1832.75.3 5.332.18 32.19 5.3 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" NF 4 A106 6.1 3.2 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 2 1 A106A105 3 A105 6 A1055 G08G07 POOL STORAGE OUTDOOR POOL DECK TEAM STORAGE 12' - 4 1/2"10' - 0" 2 A106 A105 4 3 A106 5.3 4 A106 6' - 8"6' - 2 1/4"6' - 2 1/4"0' - 8" 2' - 9 3/4" 6' - 8" CLR. WHEN OPEN 17' - 4" 32.732.18 5' - 2"G05G0632.1 5 A106 90' - 0" 10' - 0" TYP. EQ EQ EQ. TYP.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.C.J.LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 1 A106 2 A106 3 A106 6.1 3.2A308 12 SIM. TYP.8' - 0"LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 4 A106 6.1 3.2 TOP GATE ROLLER BRACKET PER MFR. GATE INFILL FABRIC TO MATCH FENCE FABRIC CANTILEVER BOT. GATE ROLLER GUIDE WITH U-BOLT CONNECTION PER MFR., TYP. FENCE POST PER MFR. SQUARE GATE FRAME PER MFR. GATE FRAME PER MFR. STORAGEPOOL DECK POOL DECK LEVEL 0' -0"7' - 0"TOP RAIL PER FENCE MFR. 2 1 A106A105 3 A105 6 A1055 2 A106 A105 4 3 A106 4 A106 POOL STORAGE OUTDOOR POOL DECK TEAM STORAGE 5 A106 32.19 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES# STAMP: PERMIT SET PLANS AND ELEVATIONS - POOL STORAGE A105 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3/16" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION - POOL STORAGE 3/16" = 1'-0"5 EAST ELEVATION - POOL STORAGE # DESCRIPTION 3.2 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB 5.3 METAL GATE, PAINTED 6.1 COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 32.1 FENCING, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK 32.7 CANTILEVERED SLIDING GATE, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK INFILL 32.18 VINYL WIND SCREEN 32.19 SHADE FABRIC ASSEMBLY WITH STAINLESS STEEL CABLES AND HARDWARE; ATTACHMENT OF FABRIC TO BE DELEGATED DESIGN. 3/16" = 1'-0"1 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - POOL STORAGE 3/16" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION - POOL STORAGE 3/16" = 1'-0"6 WEST ELEVATION - POOL STORAGE 3/4" = 1'-0"9 CANTILEVER SLIDING GATE SECTION 3/16" = 1'-0"2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN - POOL STORAGE REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION266 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 1 A106 2 A106 3 A1066.1 5.1 3.2 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 4 A106 32.19 32.1 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 4 A106 32.7 6.1 5.132.19 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" 4 A106 6.15.1 32.19 T.O. CURB +0' -6" T.O. DECK POOL STORAGE T.O. STL. +2' -0" 0' - 8" COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION LAYOUT T.O. STL. +7' -0" T.O. STL. POST +8' -0" HSS 4x4x3/8, POST BEYOND PTD., TYP. S.S.D. HSS 4x4x3/8, PTD., TYP. HSS 4x4x3/8, PTD., TYP. END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR. CAP PLATE, CONT. WELD 4 SIDES, GROUND SMOOTH, PTD. END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR. EQ EQ 0' - 2"C.I.P. CONC. CURB0' - 6"SEE 12 / A308 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES# STAMP: PERMIT SET SECTIONS AND DETAILS -POOL STORAGE A106 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3/16" = 1'-0"4 LONGITUDINAL SECTION - POOL STORAGE 3/16" = 1'-0"3 TRANSVERSE SECTION - POOL STORAGE 3/16" = 1'-0"1 SECTION - POOL STORAGE @ SLIDING GATE 3/16" = 1'-0"2 SECTION - POOL STORAGE @ TEAM STORAGE 1" = 1'-0"5 ENLARGED SECTION @ POOL STORAGE # DESCRIPTION 3.2 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB 5.1 STRUCTURE, S.S.D., PAINTED 6.1 COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 32.1 FENCING, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK 32.7 CANTILEVERED SLIDING GATE, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK INFILL 32.19 SHADE FABRIC ASSEMBLY WITH STAINLESS STEEL CABLES AND HARDWARE; ATTACHMENT OF FABRIC TO BE DELEGATED DESIGN. REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION267 42" MIN./44" MAX.3' - 0"10"HSS 4x4. PTD. HSS 8x4, PTD. HSS 8x4, PTD. GATE SECTION A GATE ELEVATION EQ 1EQ 1PTD. 1/4" STEEL PLATE, TYP. 3' - 0" A A GATE PLAN VIEW 8 '- 4" @ GATE G038' - 0" @ GATE G020' - 2"2"0' - 4" CHAINLINK INFILL, MATCH ADJACENT FENCE FABRIC HSS 4x4, PTD. PTD. 1/4"X2" STEEL PLATE, TYP. GATE HINGE, TYP. CHAINLINK INFILL, MATCH ADJACENT FENCE FABRIC CHAINLINK INFILL, MATCH ADJ. FENCE ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGN WHERE OCCURS 8' -4" @ GATE G038' - 0" @ GATE G02REMOVABLE POST REMOVABLE POST (BEHIND GATE PANELS)8"1' - 0"5"7"CONCRETE FOOTING, SSD PANIC HARDWARE STEEL PLATE, PAINTED GATE HINGE PER HARDWARE SCHEDULE 7' - 0"EXIT DEVICE GUARD, 3/16" X 4" FLAT BAR W/ ROUNDED CORNERS, WELDED TO METAL PLATE, PAINTED TO MATCH GATE GATE LEVER, SEE HARDWARE SCHEDULE 1-1/2" DIA.GALV. PIPE RAIL, PTD., ALL WELDS GROUND SMOOTH, TYP. 1-1/2" DIA.GALV. PIPE RAIL, PAINTED POST POCKET: HOT DIP GALV. STL. POST SLEEVE CIP 3" I.D. MAX W/ 1/4x5x5 PLATE WELDED W/ 3/16" FILLET ALL-AROUND; SET POSTS IN NON-SHRINK GROUT; SET TOP BELOW FINAL GROUT LINE FOR 1" COVER 0' - 8"3/8" CONC. SLAB BLOCKOUT, SSD 1' - 2"1' - 0" (2) #4 ADD BARS EACH WAY2' - 10" MAX AFF0' - 6"POOL DECK, SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS 1" ABV DECK1/2" SAND INFILL3"3" CLASS 2 PERMEABLE BASE ROCK, 3/4" MAX GRAVEL SIZE ARTIFICIAL TURF IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM F1951 2X4 PTDF NAILER, ATTACH TO CONC USING WEDGE ANCHORS. NAILER TO BE PLACED 3/8" -1/2" BELOW T.O. DECK 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET SITE DETAILS A110 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/2" = 1'-0"1 POOL ENCLOSURE GATE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 GRAB BAR RAIL AT DRINKING FOUNTAIN 1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 ARTIFICIAL TURF REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION268 A NB NC ND NE NFNF 4 5 6 7 9 NA 32 F G E H 11 J L N D B C 4.1 5.1 6.1 A300 1 A300 320' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"2 A306 10 1 A305 3 A3052 A305 3 A306 A301 1 A300 2 LOBBY A1 WOMEN'S LOCKER A2 MEN'S LOCKER A7 ACTIVITY ROOM A22 JANITOR STORAGE A4 FAMILY CHANGING A5 ADULT CHANGING A6 IDF A8 TRASH A9 ACID A11 OFFICE A16 LIFEGUARD A18 OFFICE A19 RESTROOM A20 WOMEN'S LOCKER A23 MEN'S LOCKER A24 RESTROOM A17 FIRE RISER A10 A502 1 2 A500 3 A401 1 SF5 SF6 SF7 SFN2 SF8 SFN1 A01A A01B A03A A02A A02B A01C 2 A5007 1 6 A50112 10 9 11 A502 3 POOL STORAGE A15 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.1 22.1 8.11 5.3 A402 1 A405 1 A04B A07A A503 1 2 A308 1 A07B A08 A14A A13A A10A A09A G01 A406 1A23AA24A N1A N1B N1D N1E8.9 A19AA16AA17A A20ASF10 SF11 SF9 SF14 SF13 OUTDOOR POOL DECK 1 A306 4 A305 22.2 A404 1 9.12 9.12 STAFF SHOWER A21 A21A5.5 G08 22.4 A501 3 1 24 A501 7 5 68 70.00°A3013 ROOF OUTLINE ABOVE ROOF OUTLINE ABOVE ROOF OUTLINE ABOVE 22.1 CHLORINE A12 POOL MECH A14 ELEC A13 4 1 A310 2 A310 3 A310 4 A310 3 A311 4 A311 1 A312 2 A312 1 A313 2 A313 3 A313 1 A314 2 A314 1' - 4"2' - 2"2 A311 2.1 5.2 B.1 E.1 10.1 10.2 M 8 P 12 K A308 6 SF2 SF3 SF4 A931 1 A04A A403 1 1 A500 5 A11A A12A A14B A13B A05A A06 NATATORIUM N1 17' - 0"24' - 6"24' - 6"24' - 6"24' - 6"15' - 0"13' - 9" 7' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 10"4' - 2"15' - 4"9' - 0" 1 2 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 2 " 5 ' - 6 "3 ' - 4 "12' - 1"7' - 7"19' - 8"12' - 2"19' - 5"4' - 6"17' - 0"2' - 6"18' - 8"17' - 0"15.00° 70.00° A15A 6' - 6"7' - 3"12' - 0"22' - 2"13.3 10.7 A500 4 A22C 7.9 SOFFIT ABOVE 10.3 10.3 10.310.3 12.212.2 A18A 21.2 32.632.6 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 N1C 8.8 5.101' - 5 1/2"3 7 55 55 5 5 E2 E3A E4.1 E4.1 E4.1 E4 E4 E6 E4A E7 E7 E9 E9 E9 E1 E1 E8 E8 E4A E9 E9 E9 3 ' - 7 1 /2 " E5 A813 2 SF12 SF1 1 A311 A301 4 E3 E1 E4A E4A E7 21' - 8"1' - 5" 3 21.221.2 5.9 4 G09 32.1 A301 5 6 E8 12.3 9 9 A300 4 A22B A22A A22D 12.2 E1 22.622.6 CORRIDOR A3 PP PP PP 8.7 PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP PP 21.2 8.7 PP 18 11.5 12.2 E3 55 55 5 5 0 ' - 6 " 4 3 4 4 4 SFN73 A314 21.4 METAL STUD FRAMING CMU WALL, SEE CMU PLAN AND S.S.D. DOOR / GATE NUMBER STOREFRONT KEY 101 PARTITION KEY -SEE SHEETS A810 AND A900 # SF# 1 HR RATED WALL WALL-MOUNTED VERTICAL ACTUATOR PUSH PLATE TO START THE AUTO OPERATOR, SEE ELECTRICAL AND LOW VOLTAGE DRAWINGS, SEE SPECS, PP SEE 11 / A021 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND # STAMP: PERMIT SET FLOOR PLAN A200 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 # DESCRIPTION 5.3 METAL GATE, PAINTED 5.5 STRUCTURAL BRACE FRAME, S.S.D., PAINTED 5.9 METAL CANE DETECTION RAIL, PAINTED 5.10 PREMANUFACTURED METAL SHIP LADDER, PAINTED 7.9 DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 8.7 AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER - BOLLARD MOUNTED WITH PUSH PLATE AND CARD READER 8.8 FOLDING / SLIDING GLASS PARTITION (BID ALTERNATE) 8.9 INTEGRATED SWING DOOR IN FOLDING / SLIDING GLASS PARTITION 8.11 ALUMINUM FRAMED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM 9.12 RECESSED WALK OFF MAT 10.3 PHENOLIC BENCH ON POWDER COATED ALUMINUM PEDESTALS 10.7 METAL SHELVING, OFCI 11.5 SWIMSUIT SPINNER 12.2 MANUAL WINDOW SHADES 12.3 WALL-MOUNT BIKE RACK, PROVIDE BLOCKING 13.3 ACCESSIBLE POOL LIFT, SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS 21.2 PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SEMI RECESSED CABINET - 2A10BC RATING 21.4 PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SURFACE MOUNTED, ELECTRICALLY NON-CONDUCTIVE (CLASS C) 22.1 DUAL HEIGHT DRINKING FOUNTAIN W/ BOTTLE FILLER, S.P.D. 22.2 DECK MOUNTED RINSE SHOWER WITH 2 SHOWER HEADS AND HOT WATER, S.P.D. 22.4 WASHER / DRYER, OFCI 22.6 EMERGENCY EYEWASH STATION, SEE POOL DRAWINGS 32.1 FENCING, VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK 32.6 C.I.P. CONCRETE POOL DECK, SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS PLAN NORTH 1. MOISTURE AND MOLD RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD TO BE USED AT NATATORIUM. REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION269 A NB NC ND NE NF 4 NA 32 D B C 4.1 A300 3 A308 3 A308 2 A301 1 2' - 10" WOMEN'S LOCKER A23 MEN'S LOCKER A24 SFN2 SF8 A01C 22.2 22.2 22.1 A308 1 8.11 G01 OUTDOOR POOL DECK POOL STORAGE N1A N1B N1D NATATORIUM N1 9.12 A3088 A308 7 A105 120' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"2.1 B.119' - 0"A308 6 SF15 SF16 1 7' - 0" 17' - 0"24' - 6" 15.00° 1 0 4 ' - 4 " 2 6 ' - 4 " 3 8 ' - 0 " 4 0 ' - 0 " 10' - 7" 47' - 6"0' - 10" EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ. 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " E Q . E Q . E Q .E Q . N1C 8.4 8.4 21 A308 15 8.00 °112.00°G02 G08 G05 G06 G07 5' - 0" A308 4 7' - 3"12' - 0"22' - 2"94' - 11 1/2"TEAM STORAGE A308 9 A308 10 13.3 13.2 3.5 7.9 32.8 ROOF OUTLINE ABOVE ROOF OUTLINE ABOVE 40' - 0"13' - 6"14' - 6"3' - 6"G03 G046' - 10"3' - 10 1/2"E Q . E Q . E Q .EQ.EQ.10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"104' - 5 3/4"103' - 0 1/2"9' - 9 3/4" 11' - 7 3/4" A301 4 G09 A105 2 A301 5 6 A300 4 3.10 AT C/L OF COLUMNS & ENDS OF RADIUSED WALLS, TYP. 3.11 METAL STUD FRAMING CMU WALL, SEE CMU PLAN AND S.S.D. DOOR / GATE NUMBER STOREFRONT KEY 101 PARTITION KEY -SEE SHEETS A810 AND A900 # SF# 1 HR RATED WALL WALL-MOUNTED VERTICAL ACTUATOR PUSH PLATE TO START THE AUTO OPERATOR, SEE ELECTRICAL AND LOW VOLTAGE DRAWINGS, SEE SPECS, PP SEE 11 / A021 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND # STAMP: PERMIT SET FLOOR PLAN - OUTDOOR POOL A201 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 - OUTDOOR POOL # DESCRIPTION 3.5 6" STRUCTURAL SLAB W/ #4 REBAR @ 12" O.C. TIED BOTH WAYS. EXTEND SLAB TO 6" BEYOND BLEACHER FOOTPRINT. 3.10 CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT 3.11 CONCRETE MOW STRIP 7.9 DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 8.4 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8.11 ALUMINUM FRAMED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM 9.12 RECESSED WALK OFF MAT 13.2 4 ROW ALUMINUM BLEACHERS, O.F.O.I. 13.3 ACCESSIBLE POOL LIFT, SEE AQUATIC DRAWINGS 22.1 DUAL HEIGHT DRINKING FOUNTAIN W/ BOTTLE FILLER, S.P.D. 22.2 DECK MOUNTED RINSE SHOWER WITH 2 SHOWER HEADS AND HOT WATER, S.P.D. 32.8 ARTIFICIAL TURF PLAN NORTH REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION270 A NB NC ND NE NF 4 5 6 7 9 NA 32 F G E H 11 J L N D B C 4.1 5.1 6.1 A300 1 2 A306 LOW ROOF 10 1 A305 3 A305 2 A305 3 A306 A300 2 8.10 A308 1 15' - 9" 8.10 8.13 17' - 0" 8.10 8.10 1 A306 4 A305 5.14 A301 2 A3013 1 A310 2 A310 3 A310 4 A310 3 A311 4 A311 1 A312 2 A312 1 A313 2 A313 3 A313 1 A314 2 A314 2 A311 2.1 5.2 B.1 E.1 10.1 10.2 M 8 P 12 K 1 NATATORIUM ROOF (SOLAR READY AREA) LOW ROOF OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN 7.111/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"8.10 8.10 17' - 0"24' - 6"24' - 6"24' - 6"24' - 6"15' - 0"13' - 9" 7' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 10"4' - 2"15' - 4"9' - 0" 1 2 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 2 " 5 ' - 6 "3 ' - 4 "12' - 1"7' - 7"19' - 8"12' - 2"19' - 5"4' - 6"17' - 0"2' - 6"18' - 8"17' - 0" 15.00° 15' - 9" 12' - 9" 1/4" / 12" 1 /4 " / 1 2 " 1 /4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 13' - 10 1/4" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1 A3111/4" / 12"28' - 0" 24' - 5 1/2" A802 1 A802 7 A309 1 10.16 8.10 E7 E7 E7 8' - 2"11' - 3 1/2"5.4 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 3 A3141/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND # STAMP: PERMIT SET ROOF PLAN A205 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN # DESCRIPTION 5.4 SHIP LADDER WITH PLATFORM. COORDINATE ANGLE AND PLATFORM WIDTH WITH MECHANICAL DUCT. 5.14 PREMANUFACTURED ROOF ACCESS LADDER, PAINTED 7.11 TPO ROOF MEMBRANE O/ ROOF BOARD O/ POLYISOCYANURATE INSULATION BOARD O/ METAL DECK 8.10 14" DIA. TUBULAR DAYLIGHTING DEVICE WITH SELF FLASHING CURB, SEE SPECS (BID ALTERNATE) 8.13 PREMANUFACTURED ROOF ACCESS HATCH 10.16 FALL ARREST SYSTEM PLAN NORTH 1. SEE MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. ROOFING MATERIAL TO BE NO LESS THAN CLASS C FIRE RATED PER CBC TABLE 1505.1. SEE SPECS. REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION271 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A300 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION272 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A301 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION273 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" A NB NC ND NE NF T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" NA DBC T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" 2 A306 T.O.S +12' -6" NATATORIUM N1 ACTIVITY ROOM A22 3 A306 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" 1 A306 2 A314 B.1 3 A314 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" ANBNCNDNENF T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" NAD BC T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" 2 A306 T.O.S +12' -6" 3 A306 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" 1 A306 NATATORIUM N1 LOBBY A1 B.1 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" FG EHJLN T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" T.O.S +12' -6" MEN'S LOCKER A7 WOMEN'S LOCKER A2 LOBBY A1 4 A305 5.14 POOL MECH A14 E.1MPK 5.4 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" 11 T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" 10 T.O.S +12' -6" 3 A305 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" MEN'S LOCKER A7 NATATORIUM N1 TRASH A9 10.1 10.2 12 5.4 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. SEE AQUATICS DRAWINGS FOR POOL SECTIONS. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB INFORMATION. 5. SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR EARTHWORK AND GRADING AND COMPACT FILL MATERIAL. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTESLEGEND# STAMP: PERMIT SET BUILDING SECTIONS A305 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - NATATORIUM AND ACTIVITY ROOM # DESCRIPTION 5.4 SHIP LADDER WITH PLATFORM. COORDINATE ANGLE AND PLATFORM WIDTH WITH MECHANICAL DUCT. 5.14 PREMANUFACTURED ROOF ACCESS LADDER, PAINTED 1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION - NATATORIUM AND LOBBY 1/8" = 1'-0"3 BUILDING SECTION - LOCKER ROOMS 1/8" = 1'-0"4 BUILDING SECTION - MEN'S LOCKER ROOM AND NATATORIUM REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION274 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" 456 T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" 79 3 24.15.16.1 T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" T.O.S +12' -6" 1 A305 2 A305 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" MEN'S LOCKER A24 ACTIVITY ROOM A22 RESTROOM A17 RESTROOM A20 LOBBY A1 WOMEN'S LOCKER A2 2.15.28 5.4 A910 11 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" 4 5 6 T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" 7 9324.1 5.1 6.1 T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" T.O.S +12' -6" 1 A305 MEN'S LOCKER A7 NATATORIUM N1 TRASH A9 2 A305 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" 2.1 5.2 8 5.4 LEVEL 1 +0' -0" T.O. NATATORIUM PARAPET +28' -0" 4 5 6 T.O. LOW PARAPET +15' -9" 7 9324.1 5.1 6.1 T.O. HIGH PARAPET +17' -0" T.O.S +12' -6" 1 A305 2 A305 T.O.S. NATATORIUM +22' -6" POOL STORAGE A15 NATATORIUM N1 7.2 POOL MECH A14 ELEC A13 2.1 5.2 8 7.1 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. SEE AQUATICS DRAWINGS FOR POOL SECTIONS. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB INFORMATION. 5. SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR EARTHWORK AND GRADING AND COMPACT FILL MATERIAL. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES# STAMP: PERMIT SET BUILDING SECTIONS A306 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 # DESCRIPTION 5.4 SHIP LADDER WITH PLATFORM. COORDINATE ANGLE AND PLATFORM WIDTH WITH MECHANICAL DUCT. 7.1 METAL PANEL 7.2 CEMENT PLASTER, PAINTED 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - OUTDOOR LOCKER ROOMS AND LOBBY 1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION - NATATORIUM AND LOCKER ROOMS 1/8" = 1'-0"3 BUILDING SECTION - NATATORIUM AND MECHANICAL ROOM REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION275 POOL DECK T.O. CONC. WALL +3' -0" T.O. DECK 0' - 10" T.O. STL. +12' -0" HSS 8x6, PTD., TYP. HSS 8x6, PTD., TYP. HSS 8X6, POST BEYOND PTD., TYP. S.S.D. END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN W/ ALUMINUM INSERT PER MFR.GAP1/2"T.O. STL. +3' -6" GAP 1/2" END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. C.I.P. CONC. WALL WELD 4 SIDES, GROUND SMOOTH, PTD., TYP. T.O. WIND SCEEN +15' -0" SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS S.S.D. FOR FOOTINGS 3' - 0"6' - 0"RADIUS 15' - 0"6.2 3.1 SEE PLAN 3.10 T.O. DECK T.O. CONC. WALL +3' -0" T.O. WIND SCEEN 9' - 0"3.10 TYP., SEE SHEET A201 FOR LAYOUT RADIUSRADIUS 3' - 0"9' - 0"3' - 0"SEE PLANS SEE PLANS SF15 A308 11 TYP. 21 A3088.46.2 3.1 26 A308 3.10 TYP., SEE SHEET A201 FOR LAYOUT 3.10 3.10 RADIUS SEE PLANS SF16 3' - 0"3' - 6"8' - 6"7' - 0"3' - 0"8' - 6"6.28.45.3 3.1 3.10 5.3 TYP., SEE SHEET A201 FOR LAYOUT 3.10 SF #STOREFRONT AND CURTAIN WALL KEY SEE SHEETS A805 & A806 FOR SCHEDULE METAL PANEL KEY -SEE SHEETS A802 & A803 FOR SCHEDULEM- 1. FFE: +0' - 0" = +26.25, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL OPENINGS ARE FULL OR 1/2 BLOCK CMU MODULES U.O.N. SEE CMU PLAN FOR MORE INFO AND WALL PLACEMENT. 3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. SPRINKLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH DUCTS, PIPING, CONDUIT, LIGHTING, ACCESS PANEL LOCATIONS AND OTHER CEILING ELEMENTS FOR A CLEAN, ARCHITECTURAL APPEARANCE. 4. SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. SEE SLAB PLAN. 5. LOCATIONS OF DRAINS ARE MEASURED TO GRIDLINES. ALL FLOOR DRAINS ARE TO BE CENTERED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SPACES, U.O.N. 6. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED, U.O.N. A308 12 5.1 6.23.1 5.1 2' - 6"3' - 6"6.2 8.45.13.1 SF15 SF16 6.2 5.1 8.4 13.25.1 5.15.3 5.33.1 6.2 5.16.2 T.O. WIND SCREEN +15' -0" SS05050 BOARDS +12' -0" INNOWOOD RS15050 INNOWOOD SS05050 -OPEN BETWEEN FULL HEIGHT RS15050 BOARDS 3' - 0"T.O. INNOWOOD GAP TYP. 0' - 0 1/8" T.O. WIND SCREEN +15' -0" INNOWOOD RS15050 INNOWOOD SS05050 ALIGN POOL DECK T.O. CONC. WALL +3' -0" T.O. DECK 0' - 10" T.O. STL. +10' -0" HSS 8x6, PTD., TYP. HSS 8x6, PTD., TYP. HSS 8X6, POST BEYOND PTD., TYP. S.S.D. END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. ALUM. FRAMED STOREFRONT SYSTEM T.O. STL. +3' -6" GAP 1/2" C.I.P. CONC. WALL WELD 4 SIDES, GROUND SMOOTH, PTD., TYP. T.O. WIND SCEEN +15' -0" SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS T.O. STL. +12' -0"0' - 0 1/2"END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. S.S.D. FOR FOOTINGS COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN W/ ALUMINUM INSERT PER MFR. 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTESLEGEND# STAMP: PERMIT SET SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS POOL WIND SCREEN A308 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3/4" = 1'-0"21 TYPICAL ENLARGED SECTION AT WIND SCREEN 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION - WIND SCREEN -NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION - WIND SCREEN - NORTH / WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"3 ELEVATION - WIND SCREEN - WEST # DESCRIPTION 3.1 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE, S.S.D. 3.10 CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT 5.1 STRUCTURE, S.S.D., PAINTED 5.3 METAL GATE, PAINTED 6.2 COMPOSITE WOOD WIND SCREEN 8.4 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT SYSTEM 13.2 4 ROW ALUMINUM BLEACHERS, O.F.O.I. 1/8" = 1'-0"4 ELEVATION - WIND SCREEN - SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"6 ELEVATION POOL DECK - WIND SCREEN - NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"7 ELEVATION POOL DECK - WIND SCREEN - NORHT/WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"8 ELEVATION POOL DECK - WIND SCREEN - WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"9 ELEVATION POOL DECK - WIND SCREEN 1/8" = 1'-0"10 ELEVATION POOL DECK - WIND SCREEN 1/2" = 1'-0"11 ENLARGED COMPOSITE WOOD LAYOUT - OPEN 1/2" = 1'-0"12 ENLARGED COMPOSITE WOOD LAYOUT 3/4" = 1'-0"26 STOREFRONT DETAIL AT WIND SCREEN REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION276 4 5 6 7 93 G H J L N D C 4.1 5.1 6.15.2 B.1 10.2 M 8 K5' - 8"8' - 7"20' - 1"8' - 0"8' - 6 1/2"8' - 0"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 0"9' - 8"7' - 6"8' - 6 1/2"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 10 1/4"6' - 3 1/2"2' - 2 3/4"8' - 10 1/2"11' - 1"6' - 1"6' - 1"7' - 11 3/4"7' - 11"8' - 0 1/4"8' - 5 3/4"8' - 6 1/4"7' - 0 3/4"9' - 9"8' - 0"LOW ROOF 2 A309 COMPOSITE WOOD SLAT SCREEN HSS 6X6, PTD., TYP. S.S.D.1' - 5"3' - 6 3/8"4' - 9 5/8"11 3/8"8' - 7"5' - 7 1/2"1 ' - 1 3 /4 " 8 ' - 0 3 /4 " 8' - 0"8' - 2 1/4" 4' - 5 7/8"8' - 2 1/2"8' - 2 1/2" 1' - 7 3/4"19' - 8 1/2"1 0 ' - 8 1 /2 "20' - 4 1/2"T.O.S. +12' -6" GALV. HSS 6X6, PTD., TYP. S.S.D. GALV. HSS 6X6, PTD., TYP. S.S.D. GALV. HSS 6X6, POST BEYOND PTD., TYP., S.S.D. END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. COMPOSITE WOOD END CAP BY COMPOSITE WOOD MFR., TYP. WELD 4 SIDES, GROUND SMOOTH, PTD., TYP. BEAM, S.S.D. T.O.S. +15' -6" T.O.S. +21' -0" ROOF ASSEMBLY, SEE 1 / A8300' - 6"6' - 0"3 A309 CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM CLIP PER MANUFACTURER 8' - 6"COMPOSITE WOOD CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM CLIP PER MANUFACTURER 0' - 4" TYP. HORIZONTAL GALV. HSS 6X6, PTD., TYP., S.S.D. NEOPRENE SPACER 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET PLAN AND SECTIONS - MECHANICAL SCREEN A309 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3/16" = 1'-0"1 ENLARGED PLAN - MECHAINCAL ROOF SCREEN 1" = 1'-0"2 SECTION - MECHANICAL SCREEN PLAN NORTH 3" = 1'-0"3 ENLARGED PLAN - MECHANICAL SCREEN LAYOUT REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION277 D 12 28' - 6"3' - 6"CAST IN PLACE BOARD FORMED CONCRETE W/ EASED EDGES, TYP. SURFACE MOUNTED 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH FREE STANDING 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH 1' - 6"0' - 10"0 ' - 1 0 " BUILDING ADDRESS SURFACE MOUNTED 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISHEXTERIOR WALL, SEE FLOOR PLANS AND SCHEDULE 7' - 0"0' - 6" LEVEL 1 +0' -0"1' - 7"1' - 4"1' - 6" 19' - 5" 23' - 10" 28' - 6"7' - 0"CAST IN PLACE BOARD FORMED CONCRETE W/ EASED & CHAMFERED EDGES, TYP. SURFACE MOUNTED / PINNED 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH, COLOR TO MATCH P-3 FREE STANDING 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH, COLOR TO MATCH EXTERIOR METAL PANEL 6 A802 79 T.O.S +12' -6" 8 1' - 6"39' - 0"0' - 1"1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH, COLOR TO MATCH P-3 ALUMINUM SHELF, W/ POWDER COAT FINISH, COLOR TO MATCH P-3 3' - 2"A 7 98 39' - 0" EQ.EQ.0' - 6"0' - 2"FROM FACE OF FIN.1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH ALUMINUM EDGE SHELF, W/ POWDER COAT FINISH ALIGN LETTERS W/ EDGE OF SHELF AIR/WATER BARRIER STEEL JOIST FRAMING SOFFIT VENT CEMENT PLASTER GYPSUM SHEATHING AIR/WATERBARRIER 8"4"PLASTER J EDGE TRIM J PLASTER MOULD SELF-ADHERED FLASHING 1 1/2" D X 1 5/8" WIDE FLANGE - Z FURRING CHANNEL 2-PIECE PAINTED GSM FLASHING SEALANT1' - 4"POWDER COAT ALUM. PERFORATED PLATE3/4" 1/4"1"1 1/2" 6" 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH POWDER COAT ALUM. EXTRUSION S.S. BOLT W/ NEOPRENE WASHER @ 16" O.C. S.S. BOLT W/ NEOPRENE WASHER @ 16" O.C. METAL PANEL FLAT STRAP OR SOLID BLOCKING, 54 MIL MIN. ATTACHMENT PER SIGNAGE FABRICATOR CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER PROJECT CITY COUNCIL FLOR NICOLAS, MAYOR MARK NAGALES, VICE MAYOR MARK ADDIEGO JAMES COLEMAN EDDIE FLORES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISION STEVE FIRPO, CHAIR RUTH DENARDI, VICE CHAIR BETTY BATTAGLIA BRITTANY BURGO KRISTY CAMACHO WILLIAM LOCK ROBERT UY CITY MANAGER - SHARON RANALS DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL PROJECTS - JACOB GILCHRIST PARKS AND RECREATION DEPUTY DIRECTOR - ANGELA DULDULAO ARCHITECT - ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN PROJECT MANAGER - PHILIP VITALE PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR - GREG MEDIATI PARKS DIVISION MANAGER - JOSHUA RICHARDSON CONTRACTOR - TBD DEDICATED SEPTEMBER __, 2023 1' - 6"1' - 10" NOTE: WORDING TO BE REVIEWED AND FINALIZED BY OWNER NOTES: S.S.D FOR FOOTING INFORMATION SURFACE MOUNTED / PINNED 1-1/2”THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH FREE STANDING 1-1/2” THICK PRECISION CUT ALUMINUM LETTERING (MUSEO SANS 500 FONT), W/ POWDER COAT FINISH 0' - 1"0' - 1"0' - 2 1/2"3/4"4 1/4"CAST IN PLACE BOARD FORMED CONCRETE W/ EASED & CHAMFERED EDGES, TYP. 0' - 10" A811 5 sim 03/31/25 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET EXTERIOR SIGNAGE DETAILS A802 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SIGNAGE PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SIGNAGE ELEVATION N.T.S.3 BUILDING SIGNAGE PERSPECTIVE 3/8" = 1'-0"8 BUILDING ENTRY SIGNAGE ELEVATION 3/8" = 1'-0"7 BUILDING ENTRY SIGNAGE PLAN 9 BUILDING ENTRY SIGNAGE PERSPECTIVE 3" = 1'-0"10 BUILDING ENTRY SIGNAGE SECTION DETAIL 3" = 1'-0"4 BRONZE DEDICATION PLAQUE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"6 WALL SECTION @ BOARD FORM CONCRETE REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION278 STOPSTOPEVEVEVCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTBIKELANE15STOPAHEADNATATORIUM OUTDOOR POOL DECK POOL STORAGE LOBBY ENTRY LIMIT OF WORK SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TENNI S DRIVEORANGE AVE.TENNI S DRI VE PARKI NG LOT (N. I .C. ) PROPERTY LINE NEW PARKING LOT S.L.D. AND S.C.D. ZY3ZY3 L-17 Z#1 ZY3ZY3 L-17 Z#1 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 ZG2ZG2 L-1 Z#7 ZG2ZG2 L-1 Z#7 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 1 X1WPX1WP E-1 X1WPX1WP E-1 X1WPX1WP E-1 X1WPX1WP E-1 ZY2ZY2 L-17 Z#1 ZY2ZY2 L-17 Z#1 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 3 3 3 4 ZG2ZG2 L-1 Z#7 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZS2ZS2 L-4 Z#3 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 5 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 (E)(E) R-48,50 THRU LCP (E)(E) R-48,50 THRU LCP 6 6 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1ZY1 L-15 Z#2 ZY1AZY1A L-15 Z#2 ZG2ZG2 L-1 Z#7 2 R-5 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 ZG1ZG1 L-11 Z#5 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 2351 Powell Street San Francisco, CA 94133 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES GENERAL NOTES STAMP: PERMIT SET OVERALL SITE PLAN -LIGHTING E101 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"1 OVERALL SITE PLAN - LIGHTING PLAN NORTH SIGNAGE LIGHTING TYPE AND QUANTITY PENDING FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN.1 RE-FEED (3) EXISTING LIGHTING FIXTURES MOUNTED WITHIN FLAME SCLUPTURE FROM NEW CIRCUIT (THROUGH LCP) CLEAN & RELAMP EXISTING FIXTURE. 2 ACCENT LIGHT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOR PUBLIC ART SCULPTURE PENDING FINAL DESIGN. 3 ACCENT LIGHT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOR PARK SIGNAGE PENDING FINAL SIGNAGE DESIGN. 4 GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE FOR FACADE LIGHTING (WAVE EFFECT) TO BE DETERMINED. 5 6 EXISTING POST TOP SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE TO REMAIN, INTERCEPT EXISTING UNDERGROUND BRANCH CIRCUIT ADJACENT TO POLE, PROVIDE NEW CHRISTY BOX AND EXTEND NEW WIRING (2#6, 1#6 GROUND IN 1"C) TO NEW 2P-20A CIRCUIT BREAKER IN PANEL 'R' VIA LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL. REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION279 DD DDD D D D DDD D DDDDD DLOBBY A1 WOMEN'S LOCKER A2 MEN'S LOCKER A7 ACTIVITY ROOM A22 JANITOR STORAGE A4 FAMILY CHANGING A5 ADULT CHANGING A6 IDF A8 TRASH A9 ACID A11 POOL MECH A14 OFFICE A16 LIFEGUARD A18 OFFICE A19 RESTROOM A20 WOMEN'S LOCKER A23 MEN'S LOCKER A24 NATATORIUM N1 RESTROOM A17 ELEC A13 CHLORINE A12 FIRE RISER A10 POOL STORAGE A15 STAFF SHOWER A21 R1R1 E-3 EM R1R1 L-3 R1R1 E-3 EM R1R1 E-3 EM R1R1 E-3 EM R1AR1A L-3 a R1AR1A L-3 b R1R1 E-3 EM R1R1 E-3 EM R2R2 L-3 R2R2 L-3 R1R1 L-3 R1R1 E-3 EM S1S1 L-3 R1R1 E-5 EM R1R1 L-5 R1R1 E-5 EM R1R1 E-5 EM R1R1 E-5 EM R1AR1A L-5 a R1R1 E-5 EM R1R1 E-5 EM R2R2 L-5 R2R2 L-5 R1R1 L-5 R1R1 E-5 EM R4R4 L-10 R4R4 L-10 R4R4 L-10 R4R4 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM R1AR1A L-10 a R1AR1A L-10 b R4R4 E-11 EM R4R4 L-10 R1R1 E-11 f EM R1R1 E-15 f EM S1S1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-10 S1S1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-10 R1AR1A L-10 e P1P1 L-10 P1P1 L-10 P1P1 L-10 R1AR1A L-10 a R1R1 L-2 P1P1 E-10 EM P1P1 E-10 EM R2R2 L-10 R2R2 L-10 R1R1 L-2 R1R1 E-15 EM R1R1 E-15 EM P1P1 L-6 P1P1 L-6 R2R2 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EMR1R1 E-11 EMR1R1 E-2 b EM R1AR1A L-10 d R1AR1A L-10 c R1R1 E-11 EM R1AR1A L-10 a R1AR1A L-10 b R2R2 L-10R2R2 L-10 R2R2 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 L-10 R1R1 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-10 S1S1 E-11 EM R1AR1A L-10 e R1AR1A L-10 d R1AR1A L-10 cR1AR1A L-10 b R1AR1A L-10 a R1R1 E-11 EM P1P1 E-10 EM S4S4 E-10 EM S4S4 E-10 EM P1AP1A E-10 EM P1AP1A E-10 EM P1P1 L-6 P1P1 E-10 EM P1AP1A L-6 P1AP1A E-10 EM P1AP1A L-6 P1AP1A E-10 EM P1AP1A L-6 P1AP1A E-10 EM R1R1 E-2 EM R1AR1A L-10 a R1R1 L-10 P1P1 L-6 S1S1 E-3 EM S1S1 L-3 S1S1 L-3 R1AR1A L-5 b S1S1 L-5 S1S1 E-5 EM S1S1 L-5 S1S1 L-5 ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM S2S2 E-15 a EM S2S2 L-2 a S2S2 E-15 a EM S2S2 L-2 a S2S2 E-15 a EM S2S2 L-2 a S2S2 E-15 a EM R1R1 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-10 S1S1 L-10 S1S1 E-11 EMS1S1 L-10 R3R3 L-2 b R3R3 L-2 b R3R3 L-2 b P1AP1A E-10 EM S1S1 L-10S1S1 E-11 EM P3P3 L-2 d P3P3 L-2 d P3P3 L-2 d P3P3 L-2 d P3P3 E-15 e EMP3P3 E-15 e EMP3P3 L-2 e R1R1 E-2 b EM R1R1 E-2 b EM S3S3 R-15 a S3S3 R-15 a S1S1 L-8 a S1S1 E-2 a EM P3P3 L-2 e P3P3 L-2 d P3P3 E-15 d EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM S2S2 E-15 a EM R1R1 L-10 R1R1 E-11 EM S1S1 E-11 EM S3S3 R-43 aS3S3 R-43 a R1R1 E-15 EM R1R1 E-15 EM R1R1 L-2 S1S1 L-10 S1S1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-10S1S1 L-10 S1S1 L-10 S1S1 L-10 S1S1 E-11 EM R1R1 E-11 EM S1S1 L-8 a S1S1 E-2 a EM S1S1 L-8 a P1P1 L-6 ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM ZR1ZR1 E-6 Z#6 EM R1R1 L-2 c R1AR1A E-2 b EM R5R5 E-4 EM R5R5 E-4 EM R5R5 L-12 R5R5 L-12 R5R5 L-12 R5R5 L-12 R5R5 E-4 EM R5R5 E-4 EM ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 ZS1ZS1 E-9 Z#4 EM ZS1ZS1 L-9 Z#4 K K a b a b X1 X1 a X1 a K a b X1 X1 X1 a K a b c 1 a d f 1 X1 X1 K X1 X1 X1 X1 a b d c e K K X1 X1 K a K a X1 X1 K K a b c d e X1 X1 a b c e 1 R1R1 E-2 b EM X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 NF D D P N M L K J H C G B.1 F B E.1 A E 9 121110.210.1106.165.25.154.1432.121 NA NB NC ND NE 7 8 X1 d PRIMARY DAYLIGHT ZONE SECONDARY DAYLIGHT ZONE e X1 X1 X1 X1 Z1 2 K P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 E-16 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 E-2 a EM P4P4 L-8 a P4P4 L-8 a R1R1 E-11 EM R1R1 L-10 P3P3 L-2 d R1R1 L-10 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 1620 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: SHEET NOTES GENERAL NOTES STAMP: PERMIT SET FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 -LIGHTING E200 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 1 - LIGHTING PLAN NORTH PROVIDE LOCKABLE CLEAR PLASTIC ENCLOSURE.1 KEYED DIMMING SWITCH FOR OUTDOOR POOL LIGHTS TYPES ZY2 (HIGHER HEAD) AND ZY3. THESE FLOODLIGHTS ARE TO BE DIMMED DOWN FOR AMBIENT LIGHTING ON DECK AND TO BE ON FULL POWER ONLY DURING COMPETITIONS. 2 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION280 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 2351 Powell Street San Francisco, CA 94133 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: PERMIT SET LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE E601 AUGUST 24, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 4. ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM ALL FINISHES. 3. PROVIDE COMPLETE MOUNTING ACCESSORIES, SUPPORT BRACKETS, CLIPS, ETC. AS APPLICABLE TO THE FINISH CEILING OR CEILING STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED. 2. ALL INTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE 3500K COLOR TEMPERATURE AND MIN. 90 CRI, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION, MOUNTING HEIGHT AND MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS OF ALL LUMINAIRES. REFER TO SPEC SECTION APPENDIX FOR COMPLETE FIXTURE CUTSHEETS. FIXTURE SCHEDULE NOTES: X1WP EXTERIOR SINGLE FACE WEATHERPROOF TYPE EXIT SIGN WITH GREEN LETTERS AND TAMPER PROOF ACCESSORY. AC ONLY. SURFACE (WALL/COLUMN MOUNTED) EMERGI LITE SURVIVE ALL WW-SVX-1-G--4X; 690.0454-E LED PROVIDED WITH THE FIXTURE INTEGRAL 120/277 4 W GREEN LETTERS ON WHITE EXTERIOR X2 SAME AS TYPE X1 EXCEPT WITH DOUBLE FACE CEILING OR WALL OR PENDANT EMERGI LITE PRESTIGE W-LX-2-N-G-W-UA-TRIM-MOUNTI NG-OPTIONS LED PROVIDED WITH THE FIXTURE INTEGRAL 120/277 4 W GREEN LETTERS ON WHITE THROUGHOUT X1 SINGLE FACE EDGE LIT EXIT SIGN WITH GREEN LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND. AC ONLY. PROVIDE ARROWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. CEILING OR WALL OR PENDANT EMERGI LITE PRESTIGE W-LX-1-N-G-W-UA-TRIM-MOUNTI NG-OPTIONS LED PROVIDED WITH THE FIXTURE INTEGRAL 120/277 4 W GREEN LETTERS ON WHITE THROUGHOUT S4 4'-0" LONG FIXTURE RATED FOR HAZARDOUS LOCATION AND WET RATED SURFACE (CEILING) KENALL LIGHTING ES3-48-1-45L40K-DCC-DV-HOUSI NG-PP-WW LED 4000K CCT/80 CRI 4,700 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 49 W BY ARCHITECT ACID ROOM, CHLORINE ROOM S3 2'-0" LONG UNDERCABINET LIGHT SURFACE (UNDER CABINET) WILLIAMS LIGHTING 1SF-2-L12-8-35-DMA-OPTIONS-DI M-UNV LED 3500K CCT/80 CRI 1200 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 11.4 W STANDARD ACTIVITY ROOM, LIFEGUARD S2 24" DIAMETER SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT WITH DIRECT/INDIRECT OPTIC SURFACE (CEILING) BRUCK LIGHTING BINA-S-RD-35K-24-500-DI-HOUSI NG COLOR-BEZEL COLOR LED 3500K CCT/80 CRI 2690 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 1% UNV 28 W BY ARCHITECT CORRIDOR TO LOBBY S1 10" DIAMETER SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT SURFACE (CEILING) LIGHTOLIER S10R-9-40K-22-W-Z10U LED 4000K CCT/90 CRI 2200 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 24 W WHITE LOCKER ROOM R5 SAME AS TYPE R4 BUT WITH LOWER LUMEN OUTPUT RECESSED (T GRID CEILING) FINELITE HP-X-R-D-10FT-B-935-F-277-SC-F C-1%-CEILING HARDWARE-FE-SW-OPTIONS LED 3500K CCT/90 CRI 531 LM/FT INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 1% 277 4.1 W/FT STD. WHITE 2.3 LB/FT ACTIVITY ROOM R4 RECESSED LINEAR LIGHT RECESSED (T GRID CEILING) FINELITE HP-X-R-D-LENGTH PER PLAN-H-935-F-277-SC-FC-1%-CEI LING HARDWARE-FE-SW-OPTIONS LED 3500K CCT/90 CRI 802 LM/FT INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 1% 277 6.4 W/FT STD. WHITE 2.3 LB/FT OFFICE R3 3.5" APERTURE DOWNLIGHT WITH WALL WASH OPTIC RECESSED (GYP. BD. CEILING) FOCAL POINT FLC3W-RO-SW-900L-UNV-L11-IC- LC3-RO-SW-900L-935K-WWS-WH -WP LED 3500K CCT/90 CRI 900 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 10% UNV 10 W STD. WHITE 5 LB CORRIDOR R2 4" WIDE RECESSED LINEAR LIGHT WITH REGRESSED LENS RECESSED (GYP. BD. CEILING) FINELITE HP-4-R-RG-D-LENGTH PER PLAN-S-940-RG-D-96LG-277-SC-F C-10%-SF-FE-SW-OPTIONS LED 4000K CCT/90 CRI 356 LM/FT INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 10% 277 3.6 W/FT STD. WHITE 2.8 LB/FT RESTROOM R1A SAME AS TYPE R1 EXCEPT WITH WET LISTING LABEL RECESSED (GYP. BD. CEILING) FOCAL POINT FLC3D-RO-SW-900L-UNV-LD1-IC- OD-LC3-RO-SW-900L-940K-DNT-F L1-WH-WP LED 4000K CCT/90 CRI 900 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 10% UNV 10 W STD. WHITE 5 LB SHOWERS R1 3.5" APERTURE DOWNLIGHT RECESSED (GYP. BD. CEILING) FOCAL POINT FLC3D-RO-SW-900L-UNV-LD1-IC- LC3-RO-SW-900L-940K-DNT-FL1- WH-WP LED 4000K CCT/90 CRI 900 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 10% UNV 10 W STD. WHITE 5 LB RESTROOM, LOCKER ROOM, CORRIDOR P4 ASYMMETRIC LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED ON RAILS PENDANT (STRUCTURE) BOTTOM OF RAIL AT 12'-0" AFF SPI LIGHTING LRU12273-L196W-120-277V-4000 K-DF_AC-NAT LED 4000K CCT/80 CRI 25,480 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE 277 196 W STANDARD 30 LB/HEAD NATATORIUM P3 SUSPENDED LINEAR LIGHT WITH A SMALL SQUARE PROFILE (1.38" X 1.42") PENDANT (CEILING) BOTTOM OF FIXTURE FLUSH WITH BOTTOM OF WOOD SLAT VODE LIGHTING 707-Z2-S-LENGTH PER PLAN-LENGTH PER PLAN-CC-ARM/CORD LENGTH-IP-AT--2--ZZ-Z-SO-359-S 5-0-WH-0 LED 3500K CCT/90 CRI 440 LM/FT INTEGRAL DIMMABLE TO 0.1% UNV 6.6 W/FT WHITE 0.35 LB/FT LOBBY P2 NOT USED P1A SAME AS TYPE P1 BUT 8'-0" LONG. PENDANT (CEILING MOUNT) BOTTOM OF FIXTURE AT 10'-0" AFF. WILLIAMS LIGHTING 75R-8-L100-8-40-VBY-2-MOUNTIN G-LENGTH-DIM-UNV LED 4000K CCT/80 CRI 10,038 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 63.5 W STANDARD BACK OF HOUSE P1 4'-0" LONG SUSPENDED STRIP FIXTURE. PENDANT (CEILING MOUNT) BOTTOM OF FIXTURE AT 10'-0" AFF WILLIAMS LIGHTING 75R-4-L50-8-40-VBY-2-MOUNTING -LENGTH-DIM-UNV LED 4000K CCT/80 CRI 5360 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 31.2 W STANDARD BACK OF HOUSE CATALOG # (SEE NOTES 6) WATTS TYPE DESCRIPTION MOUNTING MANUFACTURER/ LAMP DRIVER VOLTS INPUT FINISH WEIGHT LOCATION INTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE 5. ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM ALL FINISHES. 4. ALL EXTERIOR MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE UL WET LISTED EXCEPT FOR COVERED DOWNLIGHTS WHICH SHALL BE UL DAMP LISTED. 3. PROVIDE COMPLETE MOUNTING ACCESSORIES, SUPPORT BRACKETS, CLIPS, ETC. AS APPLICABLE TO THE FINISH CEILING OR CEILING STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED. 2. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE 3000K COLOR TEMPERATURE AND MIN. 80 CRI, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION, MOUNTING HEIGHT AND MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS OF ALL LUMINAIRES. REFER TO SPEC SECTION APPENDIX FOR COMPLETE FIXTURE CUTSHEETS. FIXTURE SCHEDULE NOTES: ZY3 CANOPY MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT HAVING NEMA 7X5 OPTIC AND 20 DEGREE TILT UPWARDS AND HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. HEAD TO BE SWITCHED ON AT FULL POWER ONLY DURING COMPETITIONS AND DIMMED DOWN FOR GENERAL LIGHTING. CANOPY MOUNTED (BELOW CANOPY) GARDCO PFF-276L-1A-NW-G2-SF-AIRP-277-D D-FP1-OPTIONS-FINISH; HIS-PFF-276; WVT-2-(F); LED 4000K CCT/70 CRI 117,911 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE 277 909 W BY ARCHITECT CANOPY ZY2 30'-0" TALL POLE LIGHT WITH 5" DIA. ALUM. POLE MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT HAVING NEMA 7X5 OPTIC AND 15 DEGREE TILT UPWARDS AND HOUSE SIDE SHIELD, TO BE SWITCHED ON AT FULL POWER ONLY DURING COMPETITIONS AND DIMMED DOWN FOR GENERAL LIGHTING. POLE MOUNTED (30' HIGH POLE) GARDCO PFF-276L-1A-NW-G2-SF-AIRP-277-D D-FP1-OPTIONS-FINISH; HIS-PFF-276; RTPR-5-(F); LED 4000 CCT/70 CRI 117,911 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE 277 909 W BY ARCHITECT SWIMMING POOL ZY1A SAME AS TYPE ZY1 EXCEPT WITH MOUNTING ON FENCE FENCE MOUNTED (HEAD TO BE AT 15'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR) HESS LN450-2LVC-30K-UNV-T4-A-MODIFIE D MOUNTING ON FENCE-FINISH-DIM-MS LED 3000K CCT/80 CRI 6078 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE 277 72 W ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM EXTERIOR PATHWAY ZY1 15'-0" TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT POLE MOUNTED (15' HIGH POLE) HESS LN450-2LVC-30K-UNV-T4-A-15SR-A-F INISH-DIM-MS LED 3000K CCT/80 CRI 6078 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE 277 72 W ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM EXTERIOR PATHWAYS ZS2 4'-0" LONG SURFACE MOUNTED VAPORTIGHT LIGHT SURFACE (BONDARY WALL) MOUNTED AT 7'-0" AFF DAY BRITE D-W-P-E-35L-835-4-UNV LED 3500K CCT/80 CRI 3,500 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 32 W STANDARD EXTERIOR POOL STORAGE ZS1 42 3/16" LONG SURFACE MOUNTED TO THE SKYLIGHT WALL IN THE EXTERIOR CANOPY WITH GRAZING OPTIC SURFACE (WALL) MOUNTED SUCH THAT TOP OF FIXTURE IS AT THE TOP OF THE SKYLIGHT BRUCK LIGHTING COBRA-CFP-14-35K-90-17D-FINISH- F-ACCESSORIES-DIMMING LED 3500K CCT/90 CRI 3220 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 34 W BY ARCHITECT CANOPY SKYLIGHT ZR1 4 3/8" DIAMETER RECESSED DOWNLIGHT WITH WIDE BEAM OPTIC RECESSED (EXTERIOR SOFFIT) BEGA 55 824-K35 LED 3500K CCT/85 CRI 933 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 11 W STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR CANOPY ZG2 6" DIAMETER INGRADE ROUND LIGHT WITH HONECOMB LOUVER, ADJUSTABLE BEAM TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD POST CONTSRUCTION. GROUND TARGETTI KPLM-41-ZM-L2-30-TRIM-INSTALLATI ON-INSTALLATION ACCESSORIES-1T1711 LED 3000K CCT/80 CRI 610-1127 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 14 W STANDARD AT THE BASE OF FLAGPOLE AND SCULPTURE ZG1 21" LONG IN-GRADE LIGHT WITH WIDE BEAM OPTIC FOR LIGHTING UP EXTERIOR WALL OR FAÇADE IN-GRADE BEGA 84 165-K3 LED 3000K CCT/80 CRI 1908 LM INTEGRAL DIMMABLE UNV 18.5 W STAINLESS STEEL NATATORIUM EXTERIOR FAÇADE WATTS TYPE DESCRIPTION MOUNTING MANUFACTURER LAMP DRIVER VOLTS INPUT FINISH LOCATION EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE NOTE: FIXTURE TYPE ZG1 QUALIFIES AS AN EXCEPTION AS PER TABLE 140.7-B OF THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, PART 6. FIXTURE TYPE ZG2 QUALIFIES AS AN EXCEPTION AS PER SECTION 140.7, NO. 9 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, PART 6.. FIXTURE TYPES ZY2 AND ZY3 QUALIFY AS EXCEPTIONS AS PER SECTION 140.7, NO. 4 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE. Luminaire back hemisphere is less than 0.5 MH from property line G0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Luminaire back hemisphere is 0.5 - 1 MH from property line G1 N/A N/A N/A G1 N/A Luminaire back hemisphere is 1 - 2 MH from property line G1 N/A N/A N/A N/A G1 Luminaire greater than 2 mounting heights (MH) from property line G3 G0 N/A G1 N/A N/A Maximum Allowable Glare Rating (G) For all other outdoor lighting, inlcuding decorative luminaires U3 U0 N/A U3 N/A N/A For Area Lighting U0 N/A N/A N/A U0 U0 Maximum Allowable Uplight Rating (U) Luminaire back hemisphere is less than 0.5 MH from property line B1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Luminaire back hemisphere is 0.5 - 1 MH from property line B3 N/A N/A N/A B1 N/A Luminaire back hemisphere is 1 - 2 MH from property line B4 N/A N/A N/A N/A B1 Luminaire greater than 2 mounting heights (MH) from property line No Limit B1 N/A B1 N/A N/A Maximum Allowable Backlight Rating (B) ZR1 ZS1 (N/A) ZS2 ZY1 ZY1A ALLOWABLE RATING LIGHTING ZONE 3 REFERENCE PER 2019 CAL GREEN TABLE 5.106.8 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BACKLIGHT, UPLIGHT AND GLARE (BUG) RATINGS REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION281 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 2351 Powell Street San Francisco, CA 94133 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 60% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Unnamed DRB3 JUNE 15, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEWA402 PROJECT RENDERINGS LOBBY ENTRY VIEWORANGE AVENUE AND TENNIS DRIVE VIEW NATATORIUM FROM POOL DECK VIEWORANGE AVENUE VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONZ000 282 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 2351 Powell Street San Francisco, CA 94133 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 60% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS EXTERIOR MATERIALS DRB2 JUNE 15, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 PLASTER PAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE YOSEMITE BLUE 2059-40 COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING INNOWOOD AMERICAN OAK METAL PANEL OCM CLASSIC RUST VERTICAL AT NATATORIUM, HORIZONTAL AT LOBBY SOFFIT PAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE CHANTILLY LACE 2121-70 ACCENT GLAZING NATURAL CONCRETE OUTDOOR POOL DECK REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION STOREFRONT MULLION DARK BRONZE COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN INNOWOOD AMERICAN OAK CLEAR GLAZING Z001PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION283 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ELS ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 P: 510.549.2929 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF ENGINEERS 4670 Willow Road, Suite 250 Pleasanton, CA 94588 P: (925) 396-7704 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SWA 2200 Bridgeway Sausalito, CA 94965 P: 415.332.5100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FORELL/ELSESSER ENGINEERS, INC. 160 Pine Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.837.0700 MEP / FIRE PROTECTION: GUTTMANN & BLAEVOET 2351 Powell Street San Francisco, CA 94133 P: 415.655.4000 AQUATICS: AQUATICS DESIGN GROUP 2226 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 P: 760.438.8400 SPECIFICATIONS TOPFLIGHT SPECS 49 Geary Street, Suite 230 San Francisco, CA 94108-5748 P: 415.546.6033 PROJECT TEAM: STAMP: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 60% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Unnamed DRB3 JUNE 15, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AQUATIC CENTER 1 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 REVISION NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEWA400 SITE PHOTOS PHOTO OF ORANGE AVENUEPHOTO OF EXISITNG ORANGE POOL BUILDING FROM TENNIS DRIVE PHOTO OF PROJECT SITE FROM TENNIS DRIVE PHOTO OF THE JOSEPH A. FERNEKES RECREATION BUILDING AND ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK FROM ORANGE AVENUE. PHOTO OF THE JOSEPH A. FERNEKES RECREATION BUILDING FROM THE PROJECT SITE PHOTO OF THE PROJECT SITE FROM ORANGE AVENUE. Z002PLANNING APPLICATION SUBMITTALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION284