Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-08-19 e-packet@500Monday, August 19, 2019 5:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda 1 August 19, 2019Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Council and the Planning Commission Housing Standing Committee of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Regular Meeting on Monday, August 19, 2019, at 5:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: Call To Order. Roll Call. Agenda Review. Public Comments. CLOSED SESSION Closed Session: Conference with Real Property Negotiators: (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Properties: Former South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency property known as the PUC Site (APN 011-312-060). City Negotiators: Alex Greenwood, Nell Selander, Mike Lappen, and Deanna Talavera Negotiating Parties: City of South San Francisco, South San Francisco Successor Agency, and SSF PUC Housing Partners, LLC, an affiliate of AGI Avant Group, Inc. and KASA Partners Under Negotiation: Price and terms for disposition of the property 1. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION Motion to approve the Minutes from the meetings on February 19, 2019 and March 11, 2019. 2. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development on 5.9 acres of vacant land at 1051 Mission Road. (Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator and Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner) 3. Adjournment. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024 2 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:19-705 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:1. Closed Session: Conference with Real Property Negotiators: (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Properties:Former South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency property known as the PUC Site (APN 011- 312-060). City Negotiators: Alex Greenwood, Nell Selander, Mike Lappen, and Deanna Talavera Negotiating Parties:City of South San Francisco,South San Francisco Successor Agency,and SSF PUC Housing Partners, LLC, an affiliate of AGI Avant Group, Inc. and KASA Partners Under Negotiation: Price and terms for disposition of the property City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™3 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:19-706 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:2. Motion to approve the Minutes from the meetings on February 19, 2019 and March 11, 2019. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development on 5.9 acres of vacant land at 1051 Mission Road.(Mike Lappen,Economic Development Coordinator and Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Housing Standing Committee receive this staff report and provide input regarding the proposal to develop 5.9 acres of vacant land to construct 800 residential units,a 8,300 square foot (SF) childcare facility,13,000 SF commercial retail space,approximately one acre of public open space,and related infrastructure at 1051 Mission Road and surrounding parcels. BACKGROUND On June 13,2019,SSF Housing Partners,LLC (AGI/KASA)submitted an application for a mixed-use development on a 5.9-acre site,known generally as the “PUC Site”since it was acquired from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. INTRODUCTION Given the size and breadth of this proposal,City staff has scheduled two meetings with the Housing Standing Committee to review the project.For this meeting,the staff report summarizes the proposed project,project area history,relevant legislation,community outreach process,and the preliminary architecture analysis and project level environmental review.The second Housing Standing Committee study session on this project, tentatively planned for September,will provide supplemental analysis based on feedback from the Standing Committee and Design Review Board. The Design Review Board provided initial feedback on the proposed architecture,massing,design and landscaping elements of the project at their July 16,2019 meeting.Their comments are summarized below, incorporated into this review submittal,and will be addressed by the applicant as part of their second Design Review Board hearing on August 20, 2019. PLANNING AND POLICY HISTORY South San Francisco Transit Oriented Development Policies Construction of the South San Francisco BART Station (“SSF BART”)created new opportunities for innovative planning along El Camino Real.With the adoption of the South San Francisco General Plan in 1999, the City Council recognized that the SSF BART Station area could be a new activity node that would serve local residents and attract people to our city. Specific to the El Camino Real Corridor, the City has: 1.Adopted the SSF General Plan which encourages transit oriented development; 2.Implemented the SSF BART Transit Village Plan and Ordinance; 3.Prepared plans to extend Oak Avenue from Mission Road to El Camino Real; 4.Adopted the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan and Ordinance; 5.Constructed the majority of Centennial Way over the BART-SFO right-of-way; and 6.Purchased 14 acres of vacant land from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and Ron Price City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 1 of 11 powered by Legistar™12 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. Motors to ensure high quality mixed use development. Cumulatively,these policy and development decisions have positioned the PUC Site and its surrounding environs to become a development focal point close to transit and in the geographic center of South San Francisco. SB 375 and AB 32 - Reducing Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The State of California’s two major initiatives for reducing climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are the 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)&Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations (SB 375).The legislation aims to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020,a reduction of approximately 30% by 2020, and then an 80% reduction below 1990 levels by 2050. The Grand Boulevard Initiative The Grand Boulevard Initiative is a collaboration of 19 cities,counties,local and regional agencies to improve the performance,safety,and aesthetics of El Camino Real.The City is a member of a task force to rethink the corridor’s potential for housing and urban development,balancing the need for cars and parking with viable options for transit,walking and biking,and have supported the ten guiding principles to direct future development in the area. Recent Housing Legislation On September 15,2017,the last day of the 2017 legislative session,the California Legislature responded to the state's housing crisis by passing a landmark housing package developed with the Governor’s office.The housing package included the enactment of fifteen significant bills,many of which were intended to "streamline"local government approvals of housing projects.This reflects the Legislature's view that local government approval processes significantly delay housing construction and increase costs.While SB 35 was the most publicized statute related to streamlining,its effects on local government will be relatively minor compared with those required by amendments to the Housing Accountability Act and the so-called "No Net Loss"statute.Both changes hold cities accountable to their existing zoning;in other words,projects can only be denied if they fail to meet objective design standards. AREA AND SITE PLANNING HISTORY Over the last two decades,the City has pursued a long-term and comprehensive effort to help the community find solutions for land use,housing,economic development,transportation,and conservation needs in our city. The planning efforts have helped the city respond to State mandates regarding the jobs and housing balance and adjust to new market demand for all types of housing.Since 2002,the City has adopted “smart growth” standards and approved approximately 600 new units of higher density housing along the El Camino corridor (Park Station, 636 Camino, Fairfield Development, and 889 McClellan). In 2007,the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco entered into an agreement with the City and County of San Francisco/San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to purchase 13.2 acres of land located in the vicinity of El Camino Real and Chestnut.The sale was completed and the property transferred to the Agency on January 31,2008.Within this 13.2-acre property,the PUC Site consists of two vacant lots totaling approximately 5.9 acres,identified as APN 093-312-060.The PUC Site,as envisioned in several policy documents,offers an opportunity for mixed-use development,due to its large contiguous land area,extensive frontage along Mission Road,and direct pedestrian access to SSF BART,El Camino Real shopping,Centennial Trail, and other amenities. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 2 of 11 powered by Legistar™13 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan In late 2011,the City Council adopted the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan (Area Plan)to help guide future development on the PUC Site and adjacent parcels.The subject site is zoned according to the Area Plan,with the designation High Density Residential.The plan was updated in 2017 to include the Community Civic Campus development but otherwise remains unchanged. Long Range Property Management Plan Following the dissolution of redevelopment agencies across California in 2012,the City prepared a Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP)of the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (Successor Agency).Housing properties were transferred to the City and non- housing properties,including the PUC Site,were transferred to the Successor Agency for disposition consistent with the LRPMP.The LRPMP designates the PUC property for future development and,specifically,for disposition and development of high-density,mixed-use consistent with the Area Plan.The California Department of Finance formally approved the LRPMP in 2015.Subsequently,the City/Successor Agency began fulfilling its responsibilities under the LRPMP by issuing a Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposals for the PUC Site. DEVELOPER SELECTION PROCESS AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT To dispose of the PUC Site in a manner consistent with the LRPMP,on May 1,2017 the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)for a well-qualified development team to create a high-quality,mixed-use,transit- oriented development on the PUC Site.Twelve (12)development teams responded.A Review Panel of community members whittled the responding teams down to a short list of six developers,which it recommended to the Standing Committee for approval.On October 16,2017,the Standing Committee reviewed and approved a draft Request for Proposals (RFP)and the Review Panel’s recommended short list of developers.In late October 2017,staff sent the approved RFP to the short listed developer teams.The 90-day solicitation period concluded on February 5,2018,with five (5)developer teams responding:AGI/KASA, Blake Griggs, Republic Metropolitan, Sares Regis, and SummerHill Housing Group. On March 12 and 13,2018,in publicly noticed meetings,the Standing Committee interviewed the five developer teams that submitted responses to the RFP.Each team presented their project and answered specific questions related to project design,architecture,project management,financing methods,proposed community benefits,and construction phasing.The two-day interview period culminated in a closed session during which price and terms were presented to the Standing Committee.Needing more information from three of the developer teams,the Standing Committee invited AGI/KASA,Blake Griggs,and SummerHill Housing Group to provide answers to specific Committee-directed questions on March 20,2018.Ultimately,the Standing Committee recommended AGI/KASA and Blake Griggs to the City Council/Successor Agency. On March 28,2018,in a joint meeting of the City Council and Successor Agency,it was determined after presentations by AGI/KASA and Blake Griggs,and hearing substantial public comment,that additional public input was required.The City held two public workshops on April 18,2018 where the public was invited to meet the short listed developers,hear about their proposals,and talk with City staff about the site.Over 250 people attended the workshops and staff collected over 600 comments. On May 2,2018,in a second joint meeting of the City Council and Successor Agency,AGI/KASA was selected as the preferred developer of the PUC Site.The City Council/Successor Agency directed staff met to negotiate an Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (ENRA) with the developer. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 3 of 11 powered by Legistar™14 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (ENRA) On July 11,2018,the City Council approved the ENRA between the City of South San Francisco and SSF PUC Housing Partners,LLC (AGI/KASA).The purpose of the ENRA is to establish procedures and standards for the negotiation between the City/Successor Agency and AGI/KASA in order to reach a Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA).Since the execution of the ENRA,staff has been negotiating the terms of the DDA with AGI/KASA. Community Outreach by Applicant Within 30 days of the approval of the ENRA,the developer was required to submit a comprehensive community outreach plan for approval by City staff. The approved Community Outreach Plan includes a detailed Work Plan that covered a ten month period starting in fall 2018 and ending in summer 2019.The Plan identified the goals and outcomes of planned community workshops and meetings.It was the developer’s responsibility to undertake the community outreach effort, prepare the project for entitlements,and continue community outreach through the entitlement process.As such, AGI/KASA undertook the following activities: ·Community Workshop #1 - November 2018 ·Community Workshop #2 - January 2019 ·Community Workshop #3 - May 2019 ·Project Website forum ·Signs installed onsite ·In person meetings with community members From this outreach,the developer received comments from community members and interested individuals ranging from concerns that the development is too tall and dense,to the impacts from increased traffic.Specific comments included: 1.Extending Oak Avenue would increase traffic on Arroyo Avenue; 2.Reducing lanes would add congestion on Mission Road; 3.The development would impact parking in existing neighborhoods; 4.There is need for child care and infant care services; 5.There is a need for cafés and local-serving retail; 6.There should be more affordable housing; and 7.There is a need to create better connections between neighborhoods and Centennial Trail. Project Schedule Staff and the developer have agreed to an entitlement schedule that includes the following: ·Two (2) Design Review Board meetings; ·Two (2) Housing Standing Committee meetings; ·One (1) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting; ·At least one (1) Planning Commission Public Hearing; ·At least one (1) City Council Public Hearing; and ·At least one (1) Countywide Oversight Board meeting. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 4 of 11 powered by Legistar™15 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. DISCUSSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project contains three vertical development structures on three parcels (with a companion subdivision map).Parcel 1 will have Building C2,Parcel 2 will have Building C1 and Parcel 3 will have Building B.All vertical development structures will be constructed with up to five stories of Type IIIA construction and up to three stories of Type IA construction,with stair and elevator penthouses extending 8 to 12-feet in height above the proposed 85-foot tall roofs.A complete plan set is included as Attachment 1.Any revisions to the plans that may be received after the writing of this staff report and prior to distribution of the agenda will also be provided to the Committee. Building C1 will be over a single basement structure and three above grade levels of type IA construction for parking and up to five levels of type IIIA residential construction.The basement has three level stacker parking with pits and level one has two level stacker parking.Level one is laminated with a double height entry lobby and residential units and at the south end of the building is an 8,300 SF childcare center.Level two will have two landscaped podium courtyards,a club room and residential units.Level three will have residential units. There will be five levels of type IIIA construction above level three with residential units with setbacks at various levels to conform to the zoning requirements. Building C2 will consist of a 100%affordable housing development and will have two levels of type IA construction for parking and two to five levels of type IIIA residential construction.Level one will have stacker parking with pits and will be laminated with the entry lobby and residential units.Level two will have a podium courtyard,a community room/club room and residential units.Levels three to seven will have residential units with setbacks at various levels to conform to the zoning requirements. Building B will be over a single basement structure and have three above grade levels of type IA construction for parking and five levels of type IIIA residential construction.The basement has three level stacker parking with pits.Level one has two level stacker parking for residential units and surface parking for a market hall. Level one is laminated with the entry lobby and residential units and has a 13,000 SF double height market hall (with a mezzanine)facing an outdoor market plaza.Level two will have surface parking for the residential units and will be laminated with the residential units.Level three will have a landscaped podium courtyard,a club room and residential units.There will be five levels of type IIIA construction above level three with residential units. Usable open space for the residential program,exceeding the 150 SF per dwelling unit requirement in the Municipal Code,will be provided on-site in a variety of ways including private terraces,balconies of the dwelling units and common area open space. Building C1 will have a landscaped podium courtyard on level two;Building C2 will have two landscaped podium courtyards on level two and a roof deck on level six.Building B will have an outdoor market plaza,a landscaped podium courtyard on level three and a roof deck on level seven.Off-site landscaped areas and park programming will be included as part of the Project,which would increase open space available to both Project residents and the greater neighborhood. Residential Use and Parking/Circulation Summary The Project will provide 800 residential units (including 13 live work units),158 of which will be affordable to low-income households (20%of total units),improved parks and landscaping,and active ground floor uses throughout the site,including a day care and a market hall.The Project would be approximately 1,100,089 SF, City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 5 of 11 powered by Legistar™16 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. including non-ground floor open spaces. The Project’s residential units,including the affordable units,will be comprised of a mix of studio,one- bedroom,two-bedroom,and three-bedroom units.Live-work-flex units will also be provided in Building C1. Most of these live-work-flex units will open to the park and the Centennial Trail.Vehicular drop off for Building C1 and C2 is provided at the Paseo between the two Entry lobby with a round out and a drop off zone. The move in/move out and loading areas are in the Paseo and screened with trees.Drop off for the childcare is provided off Mission Road in an off street driveway. Residential Area (Including amenity areas) ·Building B - 243,328 SF ·Building C1 - 457,181 SF ·Building C2 - 184,507 SF Commercial Area 12,992 SF (Building B, including Market Hall) Day Care Area 8,307 SF (Building C1) Vehicular Parking 879 spaces ·845 spaces for residential units ·7 spaces for childcare facility ·27 spaces for retail uses Affordable Housing As mentioned,20%of the Project’s overall units will be affordable and these units will be provided in Building C2 since it is the closest building to the SSF BART station and will likely qualify for additional funding sources.Bridge Housing,AGI/KASA’s affordable housing partner,is targeting incomes for the affordable units at an average of 50%of the area median income (AMI)with units provided for a range of incomes from 25%to 80%AMI.The reason for targeting this low AMI range is two-fold:1)SSF incomes are,on average,nearly 40%below the area median income (so 25%AMI is really closer to 60%AMI in South San Francisco)and 2) there is more State funding available for lower AMI levels.The exact income mix will continue to shift as funding for the project is secured. Childcare The developer’s childcare partner has committed to seeking State grants to subsidize 25-33%of the childcare spaces. Open Space/Recreational Uses A one-acre Community Park will be provided between Buildings C1 and C2 and the Colma Creek,and approximately 0.2 acres of Market Hall Plaza and 0.2 acres of Picnic Area will be provided on the Building B Lot.In addition,approximately 38,850 SF of open space will be provided as common open space (landscaped podium courtyard)and approximately 10,600 SF will be provided for the residential units as private open space.Building upon the existing site amenities,the project will provide a series of linked public open space arrayed along the Centennial Trail.Multiple access points from Mission Road to the Community Park will be provided.The Community Park will include children’s play area,sculpture lawn,adult fitness stations andCity of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 6 of 11 powered by Legistar™17 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. provided.The Community Park will include children’s play area,sculpture lawn,adult fitness stations and seating.The Centennial Trail pedestrian/bike trail improvement will include better lighting,new interpretive signs, seating, and bike share stations along the trail. Oak Avenue Extension Concept The applicant has proposed a phased concept,in tandem with City coordination,for Oak Avenue.In Phase I and constructed as part of the initial project,Oak Avenue extends over Colma Creek,connects to Antoinette Way and terminates into a shared street with a wide staircase and accessible switchback path that traverses up the bank to El Camino Real.The improved pedestrian and bicycle circulation of the site would integrate connections between the new housing,commercial zones,the new Civic Center,SSF BART and Orange Memorial Park to the south.Phase II,with preliminary designs included in the plan set,would construct a complete road linking Arroyo Drive with Oak Avenue through the PUC Site but is not proposed for initial construction. ZONING CONSISTENCY El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan Development Standards The PUC Site is zoned according to the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan,with designation of High Density Residential.The minimum density permitted on the property is 80 units per acre,with a maximum of 120 units per acre.The project is eligible for an increased density of up to 180 units per acre if a Transportation Demand Management program is provided,and high quality,innovative design,or maximum pedestrian and bicycle use infrastructure is included.The developer must incorporate development and design standards into the overall project site planning and design.The Plan’s density,open space,height,and FAR standards are summarized as follows and submitted analysis of the zoning consistency is included as part of the Project Plans attachment showing compliance. Heights and Building Stepbacks ECR/C-RH - 120’-0” without discretionary review; project proposes buildings no taller than 85’-0” Ground Floor Height.The minimum ground floor height for buildings with nonresidential uses at the ground level is a minimum of 15 feet,with a minimum 12-foot clearance from floor to ceiling.In the ECR/C-MXH and ECR/C-MXM sub-districts,the minimum ground floor height shall be 12 feet for buildings containing ground floor residential uses. Finished Floor Height for Residential Uses.The maximum finished floor height for ground floor residential uses is five feet above grade. Street Wall Height.The minimum height of the street wall is 25 feet and the maximum height of the street wall is 35 feet.Along Chestnut Avenue and the BART right-of-way,south of Oak Avenue,the minimum height of the street wall is 40 feet and the maximum height of the street wall is 50 feet. Front Building Stepback.A minimum of 50 percent of the street facing building frontage shall be stepped back within the area defined by a 75 degree angle originating from the top of the street wall to a point 80 feet from the average level of the highest and lowest point of the property along the public street.The Chief Planner may approve a reduced stepback percentage of 45 percent provided that a public plaza with a minimum depth of 25 feet,landscaping and seating amenities is provided on the ground level at grade,or other comparable public amenities are provided. Exceptions beyond that are subject to Planning Commission approval. City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 7 of 11 powered by Legistar™18 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. Maximum Floor Area Ratio ECR/C-RH -No requirement is included as the project is governed by height limits and a 90%lot coverage only. Maximum Density ECR/C-RH -120 units per acre;180 units per acre with Incentive Program and project proposes 136 units per acre across the 5.9 acre site. Minimum Usable Open Space (SF, per residential unit) 150 SF for all zoning districts and project proposes 120,390 square feet to meet the 120,000 SF requirement. El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan Design Standards The Area Plan includes development and design standards that were adopted by the City Council in 2011.The Zoning Ordinance implements the General Plan policies and design guidelines.The Area Plan incorporates the Plan’s design standards into the General Plan’s Guiding and Implementing policies.The key elements within the Plan’s design standards are listed as follows and submitted analysis of the zoning consistency is included as part of the Project Plans attachment showing compliance: Building Bulk The maximum lot coverage of the portion of a building above 45 feet to 80 feet from finished grade shall not exceed 80 percent of the lot area.Exceptions and modifications to dimensional standards of up to 10 percent may be granted by the Chief Planner,based on the finding that adequate design features have been incorporated to create visual variety and void a large-scale,bulky or monolithic appearance.Exceptions beyond 10 percent are subject to Planning Commission approval.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan.The DRB will review how the building bulk and massing can be improved to avoid a bulky appearance from the adjacent neighborhoods. Required Active Frontage Active uses shall be located along the building frontage along primary streets,or facing public open space or plazas,and should incorporate ground-floor retail,civic uses,cultural uses,or other amenities with direct sidewalk access and some sidewalk visibility through use of transparent fenestration.The project,cumulatively, provides active frontages along Mission Road with street level apartment access,along the proposed Oak Avenue Phase I extension via the Market Hall retail space,and along Centennial Trail by proposing live-work housing that can include ground floor retail or service space.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan’s requirements for ground floor commercial.The DRB is reviewing how the proposed development can improve access to the Market Hall from Oak Avenue. Blank Walls No wall facing streets and the BART right-of-way may run in a continuous plane for more than 20 feet without an opening.Openings fulfilling this requirement shall have transparent glazing and provide views into work areas,display areas,sales areas,lobbies,or similar active spaces,or into window displays that are at least three feet deep.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan. Exterior Building Materials and Colors A unified palette of materials shall be used on all sides of buildings and structured parking.Exterior materials shall be stone,brick,stucco,concrete block,painted wood clap-board,painted metal clapboard or other quality, and durable materials approved by the City as part of the project review.Staff has reviewed the proposal and City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 8 of 11 powered by Legistar™19 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. and durable materials approved by the City as part of the project review.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan. Building Orientation and Entrances Buildings shall be oriented to face public streets and the BART right-of-way.Residential development adjacent to public spaces or connections shall be oriented facing onto the public space.Building entrances shall be emphasized with small entry plazas,vertical massing,and architectural elements such as awnings,arcades,or porticos.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan. Required Parking Generally,parking shall not exceed two spaces per unit for residential uses and one space per 300 SF of commercial use.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan. Pedestrian Access On-site pedestrian circulation and access must be provided according to the specific standards.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan.The DRB review includes suggestions on how the developer can improve pedestrian access through the project area to Centennial Trail. Truck Docks, Loading, and Service Areas Truck docks,loading areas,and service areas must be located at the rear or interior side of buildings and be screened so as not to be visible from public streets.Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed development is generally consistent with the Plan. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The South San Francisco General Plan establishes land use designations for the area within the Area Plan boundaries. The Area Plan includes the following General Plan land use classifications: ·The General Plan High Density Residential land use classifications allow densities ranging from 80-120 units per acre within portions of the Planning Area designated High Density Residential. ·El Camino Real Mixed-Use North, High Intensity o Intended to accommodate high-intensity active uses and mixed-use development. o Retail and department stores;eating and drinking establishments;hotels;commercial recreation; financial,business,and personal services;residential;educational and social services;and office uses are permitted. ·The minimum FAR for all uses,exclusive of structured parking,is 0.6,of which a minimum 0.3 FAR must be active uses. ·The maximum FAR for all uses,inclusive of residential but exclusive of structured parking,is 2.0,with increases to a maximum total FAR of 3.0 for development meeting specified criteria. ·Residential density ranges from 80 -110 units per acre. ·Policies in the Transportation and Parks,Public Facilities,and Services elements incorporate transportation improvements and additional parkland policies included in the Area Plan. As described in the Project Description and zoning analysis,the proposed project is consistent with the vision City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 9 of 11 powered by Legistar™20 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. of the 1999 General Plan. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board (DRB)will review the project at two publicly noticed meetings.On July 16,2019, the Design Review Board held the first of the two meetings to review the architecture and landscaping plans for AGI/KASA’s proposed mixed-use project on the former PUC properties.The meeting was held in the Police Department Training Room at 33 Arroyo Boulevard,with approximately 10 interested residents and two City Council members attending.AGI/KASA presented the proposed project and the Board members provided detailed comments on all aspects of the project and asked for additional information for the next meeting, scheduled for August 20,2019.The DRB Comment Letter is included as Attachment 2 and a summary of comments are included below. ·Conduct a massing study to incorporate the adjacent buildings and show how the proposed development fits into the greater neighborhood context,including the Kaiser Building and the new residential development at 988 El Camino Real,SM County future medical center and potential development (Pacific Market) along the El Camino Real corridor under current zoning regulations. ·Buildings are too uniformly flat -horizontal line along the buildings is a little overwhelming and needs more differentiation. Show details that emphasize existing or proposed articulation on the elevations. ·Provide additional renderings and perhaps an animation or a fly through -DRB feels like it can't quite grasp the overall design just yet. ·The Design Guidelines require a strong base,middle and top,and should be well articulated by vertical planes. Refer to design guidelines in the ECR/C Area Plan. ·The proposed materials make the buildings look somewhat industrial -consider opportunity to soften the exterior materials.Consider a two-dimensional mock-up of an elevation to show materials and finishes. ·Focus on roof height variation. ·The DRB recommends using larger trees for maximum impact to scale the building and provide useable outdoor space. ·Show how the site will comply with a pickup and drop off plan for childcare,for residents utilizing Lyft, Uber, delivery services, and guests visiting the site. There were also two speakers from the public who made the following comments. ·Resides in the Sunshine Gardens neighborhood.Concern with one of the buildings standing out and being very visible from her neighborhood.Would like the applicant to change the color of the building from white to another color. The white color may cause glare. ·Concern with overflow traffic when there are events at the campus.Where will everyone park at the site? ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City Council adopted an Environmental Impact Report and Statement of Overriding Considerations in 2011 that cleared the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan and companion zoning at a program level.In 2017,City staff prepared an amendment to the Program EIR that incorporates changes to the plan created by the future Community Civic Campus.Although the Supplemental EIR for the Community Civic Campus did not specifically address the project area for this development,it did provide further guidance for traffic and land use assumptions.This Project must conduct a project-specific level analysis to ensure that the proposed development is consistent with the Area Plan and environmental assumptions conducted in 2011 and updated in City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 10 of 11 powered by Legistar™21 File #:19-688 Agenda Date:8/19/2019 Version:1 Item #:3. development is consistent with the Area Plan and environmental assumptions conducted in 2011 and updated in 2017. The applicant has prepared a consistency analysis in the form of an Addendum for the City’s consideration that finds that the Project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects than what was analyzed in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan (“ECR/C Area Plan”or “Area Plan”)Program EIR (“ECR/C EIR”)as updated by the Community Civic Campus Project Subsequent EIR (“Civic Project SEIR”).The ECR/C EIR and Civic Project SEIR are collectively referred to as the ECR/C EIRs.This document includes a description of the Project and a comparison of the potential impacts of the Project to those identified in the ECR/C EIRs. The draft analysis continues to be peer reviewed by City staff.Additionally,staff has contracted with Kimley Horn Planning and Design Engineering Consultants to re-evaluate the traffic and circulation assumptions of the 2011 EIR and 2017 SEIR under a scenario that does not include complete construction of the Oak Avenue extension.That analysis will be incorporated into the public hearing reports to ensure that this project will not exceed expected impacts from the previous environmental analysis. CONCLUSION Staff requests that the Housing Standing Committee provide input and direction regarding the proposal to develop the 5.9 acre PUC Site with construct 800 residential units,a 8,300 SF childcare facility,13,000 SF commercial retail space,approximately 1 acre of public open space,and related infrastructure at 1051 Mission Road and surrounding parcels.As of the publishing of this staff report on August 14,2019,the City had received two letters regarding this project addressed to the Committee.Those letters are included as Attachments 3 and 4. Attachments 1.Project Plan Submittal 2.Design Review Board Comment Letter from July 16, 2019 3.Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition (BayHAC) Letter of Support 4.Greenbelt Alliance Letter of Support City of South San Francisco Printed on 3/27/2024Page 11 of 11 powered by Legistar™22 c BARC O P Y R I G H T architects 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 7 PM C: \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t 2019 0 - COVER SHEET ENTITLEMENT RESUBMITTAL - 2 (DRB #1 COMMENTS RESPONSE) August 13, 2019 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT TEL: CONTACT: EMAIL: ARCHITECT: BAR ARCHITECTS 901 BATTERY STREET, SUITE 300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 415.293.5700 WILLIAM DUNCANSON [email protected] PROJECT TEAM 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 TEL: CONTACT: EMAIL: DEVELOPER: AGI - KASA 500 SANSOME, STE 750 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 415.394.9013 BRIAN BAKER [email protected] LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: GLS 2677 MISSION STREET #200 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110 CONSULTANT TO OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER SANDIS 636 9TH STREET OAKLAND, CA 94607 23 COLMA CREEK E L C AM I N O R E A L M I S S I O N CH E S T N U T A V E N U EGRAND AVENUEPROJECT SITE BLDG C2 BUILDING C1 BUILDING B N R O A D BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 4 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PROJECT INFO 2019 G0108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT CONTAINS THREE VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURES ON THREE PARCELS. PARCEL 1 WILL HAVE BUILDING C2, PARCEL 2 WILL HAVE BUILDING C1 AND PARCEL 3 WILL HAVE BUILDING B. ALL VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH UP TO FIVE STORIES OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION, WITH UP TO THREE STORIES OF TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION, WITH STAIR AND ELEVATOR PENTHOUSES EXTENDING 8-12-FEET IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE MAX. 85-FOOT TALL ROOFS. BUILDING C1 WILL BE OVER A SINGLE BASEMENT STRUCTURE + 3 ABOVE GRADE LEVELS OF TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION + UP TO 5 LEVELS OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION. THE BASEMENT HAS 3 LEVEL STACKER PARKING WITH PITS AND LEVEL 1 HAS 2 LEVEL STACKER PARKING. LEVEL 1 IS LAMINATED WITH A DOUBLE HEIGHT ENTRY LOBBY AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND AT THE SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING IS A 8,300 SF DAY CARE CENTER. LEVEL 2 WILL HAVE 2 LANDSCAPED PODIUM COURTYARDS, A CLUB ROOM AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS. LEVEL 3 WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THERE WILL BE 5 LEVELS OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION ABOVE LEVEL 3 WITH RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SETBACKS AT VARIOUS LEVELS TO CONFORM TO THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS. BUILDING C2 WILL BE A 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUILDING, AND WILL HAVE 2 LEVELS OF TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION + 2 TO 5 LEVELS OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION. LEVEL 1 WILL HAVE STACKER PARKING WITH PITS AND WILL BE LAMINATED WITH THE ENTRY LOBBY AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS. LEVEL 2 WILL HAVE A PODIUM COURTYARD, A COMMUNITY ROOM/CLUB ROOM AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS. LEVEL 3 TO 7 WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SETBACKS AT VARIOUS LEVELS TO CONFORM TO THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS. BUILDING B WILL BE OVER A SINGLE BASEMENT STRUCTURE + 3 ABOVE GRADE LEVELS OF TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION + 5 LEVELS OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION. THE BASEMENT HAS 3 LEVEL STACKER PARKING WITH PITS AND LEVEL 1 HAS 2 LEVEL STACKER PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND SURFACE PARKING FOR A MARKET HALL. LEVEL 1 IS LAMINATED WITH THE ENTRY LOBBY AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND HAS A 13,000 SF DOUBLE HEIGHT MARKET HALL (WITH A MEZZANINE) FACING AN OUTDOOR MARKET PLAZA. LEVEL 2 WILL HAVE SURFACE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND WILL BE LAMINATED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. LEVEL 3 WILL HAVE A LANDSCAPED PODIUM COURTYARD, A CLUB ROOM AND RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THERE WILL BE 5 LEVELS OF TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION ABOVE LEVEL 3 WITH RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE PROJECT WOULD PROVIDE 800 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 158 OF WHICH WILL BE AFFORDABLE TO LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, IMPROVED PARKS AND LANDSCAPING, AND ACTIVE GROUND FLOOR USES THROUGHOUT THE THREE SITES, INCLUDING A DAYCARE AND A MARKET HALL. THE PROJECT’S RESIDENTIAL UNITS, INCLUDING THE AFFORDABLE UNITS, WILL BE COMPRISED OF A MIX OF STUDIO, ONE-BEDROOM, TWO-BEDROOM, AND THREE-BEDROOM UNITS. LIVE-WORK-FLEX UNITS WILL ALSO BE PROVIDED IN BUILDING C1. MOST OF THESE UNITS WILL OPEN TO THE PARK AND THE CENTENNIAL TRAIL. PROJECT WILL INCLUDE A NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES, INCLUDING PODIUM LEVEL LANDSCAPED COURTYARDS, A FITNESS CENTER AND DOG AMENITIES. BUILDING B AND C1 WILL ALSO HAVE A CLUB ROOM/SKY LOUNGE WITH AN OUTDOOR ROOF DECK. A 1-ACRE COMMUNITY PARK WILL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN BUILDINGS C1 AND C2 AND THE CREEK, AND APPROXIMATELY 0.2 ACRE OF MARKET HALL PLAZA AND 0.2 ACRE OF PICNIC AREA WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE BUILDING B LOT. BUILDING UPON EXISTING SITE AMENITIES, THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A SERIES OF LINKED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ARRAYED ALONG THE CENTENNIAL TRAILS. MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS FROM MISSION ROAD TO THE COMMUNITY PARK WILL BE PROVIDED. THE COMMUNITY PARK WILL INCLUDE CHILDREN PLAY AREA, SCULPTURE LAWN, ADULT FITNESS STATIONS AND SEATING. THE CENTENNIAL WAY PEDESTRIAN/BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT WILL INCLUDE BETTER LIGHTING, NEW INTERPRETIVE SIGNS, SEATING AND BIKE SHARE STATIONS ALONG THE TRAIL. OAK AVE WILL EXTEND OVER COLMA CREEK, CONNECTS TO ANTOINETTE WAY AND WILL TERMINATE INTO A SHARED STREET WITH A WELCOMING OCCUPIABLE STAIR AND ACCESSIBLE ZIG ZAG PATH THAT GOES UP THE BANK TO EL CAMINO REAL. THE IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION OF THE SITE WILL FACILITATE INTEGRATED CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE NEW HOUSING, COMMERCIAL ZONES, THE NEW CIVIC CENTER, BART & THE CITY’S PRIMARY PARK - ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK TO THE SOUTH. L12.0 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CAL. DIAGRAMS ● L11.0 LANDSCAPE DETAIL ●● L10.0 LANDSCAPE PRECEDENTS ●● L9.1 LIGHTING CHARACTER IMAGES ● L9.0 LIGHTING PLAN AND LEGEND ●● L8.1 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PALETTE ● L8.0 MATERIAL PLAN AND LEGEND ●● L7.0 PLANTING PLAN AND LEGEND ●● L6.0 ENLARGE PODIUM ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● L5.0 ENLARGE PODIUM ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● L4.0 ENLARGE GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● L3.0 ENLARGE GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● L2.0 ENLARGE GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● L1.0 OVERALL ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ●● LANDSCAPE X-4 PRELIMINARY BRIDGE PLAN ●● X-3 R/W EXHIBITS AT ANTOINETTE APT& CHURCH ●● X-2 TYPICAL SECTION ●● X-1 PLAN & PROFILE - ROADSIDE SLOPES ON NORTH SIDE ●● T-8 PHASE 2 OAK AVENUE EXTENSION ●● T-7 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ●● T-6 UTILITY PLAN ●● T-5 UTILITY PLAN ●● T-4 SITE AND GRADING PLAN ●● T-3 SITE AND GRADING PLAN ●● T-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN ●● T-1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ●● CIVIL 06 / 2 0 / 1 9 S U B M I T T A L 08 / 1 3 / 1 9 S U B M I T T A L 0 COVER SHEET ● ● G01 PROJECT INFO ● ● G02 PLANNING CODE SUMMARY ● ● G03 PLANNING CODE SUMMARY ● ● G04 SITE CONTEXT - PHOTOS ● ● G05 SITE CONTEXT ● ● G06 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS ● ● G07 PROJECT DATA - BUILDING B ● ● G08 PROJECT DATA- BUILDING C1 ● ● G09 PROJECT DATA- BUILDING C2 ● ● G10 FIRE ACCESS SITE PLAN ● ● G11 FIRE ACCESS FLOOR PLAN, TYP ● ● G12 SITE CIRCULATION & ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS ● ● GENERAL 06 / 2 0 / 1 9 S U B M I T T A L 08 / 1 3 / 1 9 S U B M I T T A L A01 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING B ● ● A02 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C1 ● ● A03 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C1 ● ● A04 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 ● ● A05 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 ● ● A06 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 ● ● A07 SITE RENDERINGS PER AREA PLAN ● ● A08 SITE RENDERINGS PER AREA PLAN ● ● A09.1 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A09.2 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A09.3 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A09.4 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A09.5 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A09.6 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS ● ● A11 SITE PLAN ● ● A12 SITE ELEVATIONS ● ● A13 SHADOW STUDY ● ● A20 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - B1 - BASEMENT ● ● A21 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 1 ● ● A22 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 2 ● ● A23 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 3 ● ● A24 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 4 (LEV 5-7 SIM) ● ● A28 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 8 ● ● A29 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING B ● ● A30 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING B ● ● A31 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING B ● ● A32 BUILDING B MATERIAL BOARD ● ● A40 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - B1 - BASEMENT ● ● A41 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 1 ● ● A42 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 2 ● ● A43 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 ● ● A44 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 4 (5 SIM) ● ● A46 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 6 ● ● A47 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 7 ● ● A48 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 8 ● ● A49 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C1 ● ● A50 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C1 ● ● A51 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C1 ● ● A52 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING C1 ● ● A53 BUILDING C1 MATERIAL BOARD ● ● A61 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 1 ● ● A62 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 2 ● ● A63 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 3 ● ● A64 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 4 (5 SIM) ● ● A66 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 6 (7 SIM) ● ● A68 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C2 ● ● A70 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C2 ● ● A71 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING C2 ● ● A72 BUILDING C2 MATERIAL BOARD ● ● A81 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - S1, A1 ● ● A82 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - B1, B2 ● ● A83 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - C1 ● ● A84 UNIT PLANS - S1, A1, A2 ● ● A85 UNIT PLANS - A4, A7A & A7B ● ● A86 UNIT PLANS - B1, B2 ● ● A87 UNIT PLANS - C1 ● ● A100 SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR DETAILS ● ● A101 SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR DETAILS ● ● ARCHITECTURAL SHEET INDEXPROJECT SUMMARY EXISTING USE:VACANT LOT SUSTAINABILITY TARGET:GREEN POINT RATED, NEW HOME RATING SYSTEM FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS:SEE G10 - FIRE ACCESS PLAN SPRINKLERS:FULLY SPRINKLERED (NFPA 13 SYSTEM, NFPA 13R SYSTEM FOR STACKER PARKING) STORIES/HEIGHT ALLOWED:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY BUILDING HEIGHT:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIA OVER 2 STORIES OF TYPE IA NUMBER OF STORIES:7 ABOVE GRADE PLANE OCCUPANCY:S-2 (PARKING), R-2 (RESIDENTIAL), A-3 (ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL AMENITY) LOT COVERAGE:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY AREAS:19,515 SF PARKING, 184,507 SF RESIDENTIAL PARCEL AREA:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY SPECIFIC PLAN:EL CAMINO REAL/CHESTNUT AREA PLAN LOCATION:PARCEL 1 - AT INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVE AND MISSION ROAD PARCEL 1 - BUILDING C2 EXISTING USE:VACANT LOT SUSTAINABILITY TARGET:GREEN POINT RATED, NEW HOME RATING SYSTEM FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS:SEE G10 - FIRE ACCESS PLAN SPRINKLERS:FULLY SPRINKLERED (NFPA 13 SYSTEM, NFPA 13R SYSTEM FOR STACKER PARKING) STORIES/HEIGHT ALLOWED:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY BUILDING HEIGHT:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIA OVER 3 STORIES OF TYPE IA NUMBER OF STORIES:8 ABOVE GRADE PLANE, 1 BASEMENT PARKING LEVEL OCCUPANCY:S-2 (PARKING), R-2 (RESIDENTIAL), E (DAYCARE), A-3 (ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL AMENITY) LOT COVERAGE:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY AREAS:8,372 SF DAYCARE, 87,888 SF PARKING, 460,762 SF RESIDENTIAL PARCEL AREA:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY SPECIFIC PLAN:EL CAMINO REAL/CHESTNUT AREA PLAN LOCATION:PARCEL 1 - FRONTING MISSION ROAD PARCEL 2 - BUILDING C1 EXISTING USE:VACANT LOT SUSTAINABILITY TARGET:GREEN POINT RATED, NEW HOME RATING SYSTEM FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS:SEE G10 - FIRE ACCESS PLAN SPRINKLERS:FULLY SPRINKLERED (NFPA 13 SYSTEM, NFPA 13R SYSTEM FOR STACKER PARKING) STORIES/HEIGHT ALLOWED:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY BUILDING HEIGHT:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIA OVER 3 STORIES OF TYPE IA NUMBER OF STORIES:8 ABOVE GRADE PLANE, 1 BASEMENT PARKING LEVEL OCCUPANCY:S-2 (PARKING), R-2 (RESIDENTIAL), M (RETAIL USES), A-3 (ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL AMENITY) LOT COVERAGE:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY AREAS:12,992 SF RETAIL, 86,129 SF PARKING, 243,328 SF RESIDENTIAL PARCEL AREA:SEE G02 - PLANNING CODE SUMMARY SPECIFIC PLAN:EL CAMINO REAL/CHESTNUT AREA PLAN LOCATION:PARCEL 3 - AT INTERSECTION OF OAK AVE AND MISSION ROAD PARCEL 3 - BUILDING B PLANNING CODE SUMMARY TOTAL NON-RES PARKING: 34 TOTAL RES:845 Total 475 115 289 879 NON-RESIDENTIAL 7 0 27 34 RESIDENTIAL 468 115 262 845 USE BUILDING C1 BUILDING C2 BUILDING B TOTAL PARKING STALLS ON-SITE STALL DISTRIBUTION PARKING 24 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 4 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PLANNING CODE SUMMARY 2019 G0208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 4. Front Building Stepback. A minimum of 50 percent of the street facing building frontage shall be stepped back within the area defined by a 75 degree angle originating from the top of the street wall to a point 80 feet from the average level of the highest and lowest point of the property along the public street. The Chief Planner may approv... yes No Oak Ave street frontage given current plans for Phase 1 connection.complies complies See plans, elevations & renderings 3. Street Wall Height. The minimum height of the street wall is 25 feet and the maximum height of the street wall is 35 feet. …tbd No Oak Ave street frontage given current plans for Phase 1 connection.complies The max. height of street wall is approximately 37'-4' to top of roof at the bays @Mission Road in order to allow for flexibility for modular construction.See plans, elevations & renderings 2. Finished Floor Height for Residential Uses. The maximum finished floor height for ground floor residential uses is five feet above grade.Yes 1. Ground Floor Height. The minimum ground floor height for buildings with nonresidential uses at the ground level is a minimum of 15 feet, with a minimum 12-foot clearance from floor to ceiling. In the ECR/C-MXH and ECR/C-MXM sub-districts, the minimum ground floor height shall be 12 feet for buildings containing ground floor...Yes complies at retail complies at day care n/a @ Bldg B: Oak Ave Frontage; @ building C1 - daycare frontage : mission road@ B. Heights and Building Setbacks. 2. 0.5 FAR, up to 30 units per acre and/or 20 feet of height for the following subject to Planning Commission approval: a. Projects that include high quality, innovative design and product type, and maximum provisions for pedestrian and bicycle use. b. Provision of Off-Site Improvements. This may include off-site amenities and/or infrastructure (other than standards requirements and improvements) such as funding for public safety facilities, libraries, senior centers, community meeting rooms, child care or recreation, or new or enhanced public spaces. c. Provision of green building measures over and above the applicable green building compliance threshold required pursuant to Title 15 (“Building and Construction”) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code.see above 1. 0.5 FAR, up to 30 units per acre and/or 20 feet of height for the incorporation of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures specified in Chapter 20.400, Transportation Demand Management, or as deemed appropriate by the Chief Planner for residential projects. Discretariony density bonus requested. TDM measures will be identified. Additionally, the team plans to demonstrate its high quality, innovative design and product type, maximum provisions for pedestrian and bicycle us, and oinfrastscuture improvements. A. Increased Density, FAR and/or Height. An increase in FAR, density, and height may be achieved for buildings through a combination of the following, subject to Conditional Use Permit approval by the City Council: Additional Development Standards Minimum Amount of Landscaping (% of site)10 See Section 20.300.007 Landscaping Yes complies 7.50% complies Complies for all three parcels together. See Landscape drawing. Minimum Public Open Space (% of site)0 n/a Minimum Usable Open Space (sq. ft. per res. unit)150 See G Yes See Open Space Diagrams Sheet See Open Space Diagrams Sheet Standard ECR/C-RH Additional Standards Open Space and Landscaping Standards ECR-C Sub Districts Maximum Separation between Towers (ft)30 See Above See above See plans, elevations & renderings Maximum Tower Dimension (ft)125 The maximum dimension of the portion of a building above 80 feet from finished grade shall not exceed 125 feet and must be separated from another building by at least 30 feet. Exceptions and modifications to dimensional standards of up to 10 percent may be granted by the Chief Planner, based on the finding that adequate design features have been incorporated to create visual variety and void a large-scale, bulky or monolithic appearance. Exceptions beyond 10 percent are subject to Planning Commission approval.Yes, exception requested if necessary use comments 84'-10" (85' max) within 84'-0" (85' max)79'-3" (85' max) Project is not designed with 'tower' forms. The overall building height above 80' is within 10% dimensional variance. Project requests an exemption. The max. dimension will be 5'-0" above 80'-0". Corner Build Area 30 Buildings must be located in accordance with the required setbacks within 30 feet of every corner. Public plazas may be at the street corner provided buildings are built to the edge of the public plaza.Yes Building is built to edge of public plaza n/a -- no street corners n/a -- no street corners See plans, elevations & renderings Maximum Lot Coverage (% of lot)90%See Ch. 20.040 Rules of Measurement Yes 59.8 56.41 65.5 Parcel areas per new parcel mapping by civil Rear 0 n/a Interior Side 10' min when abutting residential districts Yes n/a n/a complies All other street frontages 10'Yes Phase 1 Oak avenue is a shared space used a surface parking area.complies complies from property line; buildings shall be constructed at req'd setback for 65% of linear street frontage. See also site plan. BART Frontage ROW 0 n/a --- Yards (ft)---- Maximum Ground Floor Height (Residential uses)5 20.270.004 (B) (2): Finished Floor Height for Residential Uses. The maximum finished floor height for ground floor residential uses is five feet above grade.Yes complies/varies complies/varies complies/varies Minimum Ground Floor Height (residential uses)n/a See 20.270.004 (B). Heights and Building Stepbacks. In the ECR/C-MXH and ECR/C-MXM sub-districts, the minimum ground floor height shall be 12 feet for buildings containing ground floor residential uses.n/a n/a per 20.270.004-2 - varies from ECR/CAP separate plan document Minimum Ground Floor Height for non-residential uses 15; 12 min clearance [TABLE 20.270.004-2 SAYS N/A] See 20.270.004 (B). Heights and Building Stepbacks., 1. Ground Floor Height. The minimum ground floor height for buildings with nonresidential uses at the ground level is a minimum of 15 feet, with a minimum 12-foot clearance from floor to ceiling.Yes complies at retail complies at day care n/a Maximum Building Height PROPOSED AMENDMENT SHOWS 80/120 BUT CURRENT MAP SHOWS 120/160 See 20.270.004 (A) Increased Density FAR and/or Height Yes 84'-11" (85' max)84'-7" (85' max)80' 5 1/2"(85' max) Minimum Building Height 25, 40' along Chestnut Avenue and BART right-of-way, south of Oak... See 20.270.004 (B). Heights and Building Stepbacks.n/a Height (ft)----- Standard ECR/C-RH Additional Standards Building Form and Location Standards – ECR/C Area Plan Sub-Districts Limitations: For qualifying affordable Senior Housing projects; and, for developments on corner parcels or lots greater than one acre.----- Maximum Density with Incentive Program. Does not include density bonuses allowed per Chapter 20.390 Bonus Residential Density 180 See (A) and See Chapter 20.390, Bonus Residential Density Yes complies complies n/a Maximum Density 120 Yes, CUP requested for discretionary density bonus complies with discretionary bonus complies complies Minimum Density 80 Yes complies complies complies Residential Density (units per acre)-132.2 118.95 106.75 update per area Maximum FAR with Incentive Program n/a n/a n/a Maximum FAR n/a n/a n/a Minimum FAR n/a n/a n/a Floor Area Ratio (FAR)n/a Minimum Lot Width (sq. ft.)50 Yes Minimum Lot Size (sq. ft.)20,000 Yes 77,272 149,295 64,408 Per new parcel mapping by civil. Standard (per Sub-District)ECR/C-RH Additional Standards B C1 C2 Lot, Density, and FAR Standards - ECR/C Are Planh Sub-Districts Additional Notes/ Comments Project Address: 1051 Mission Road Zoning: High Density Residential Proposal Compliance for Project (please fill out Yes, No, or NA) Please stipulate how the proposal complies (i.e. provide specific lot/parcel data, measurements, etc.) City of SSF -Conformance Development Checklist for El Camino Real / Chestnut Area Plan Districts 25 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 4 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PLANNING CODE SUMMARY 2019 G0308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 M. Truck Docks, Loading, and Service Areas. Truck docks, loading areas, and service areas must be located at the rear or interior side of buildings and be screened so as not to be visible from public streets.Yes Move-in/move-out loading area for Building B located in building garage in north side of Building B. Market hall loading to within the market plaza. Movein/move out loading area located inside the Paseo and screened with trees Movein/move out loading area located inside the Paseo and screened with trees See site circulation plan 1. Internal Connections. A system of pedestrian walkways shall connect all buildings on a site to each other, to on-site automobile and bicycle parking areas, and to any... L. Pedestrian Access. On-site pedestrian circulation and access must be provided according to the following standards.yes K. Maximum Block Length. 600 feet; block length of up to 800 feet is allowed when a mid-block connection with a minimum width of 30 feet is provided. Yes complies complies complies The length's are based on the new proposed parcel mapping J. Limitations on Curb Cuts. Curb cuts shall be minimized and located in the location least likely to impede pedestrian circulation. Curb cuts shall be located at least 10 fe...Yes 3. The maximum height of a parking podium visible from El Camino Real is five feet from finished grade.n/a n/a n/a n/a Property does not have any frontage along El Camino Real a. The design incorporates habitable space built close to the public sidewalk to the maximum extent feasible. b. The site is small and constrained such that underground parking or surface parking located more than 40 feet from the street frontage is not feasible. 2. Above ground parking may not be located within 40 feet of a street facing property line or BART right-of-way. Exceptions may be granted with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit when the following findings can be made:Yes no oak avenue street frontage given current plans for phase 1 connection complies complies All parking is located in garages which are largely lined with active uses. 1. Buildings shall be placed as close to the street, or public plaza or open space provided along street, as possible in compliance with the required setback, with parking located either underground, behind a building, or on the interior side or rear of the site.Yes I. Limitations on Location of Parking 2. In-Lieu Fees. In the ECR/C Parking District, the City may establish a parking mitigation fund and require payment of a fee in lieu of providing required parking on-site or off-site. a. In-Lieu Fee Amount. The amount of the in-lieu fee shall be calculated and paid as set forth in a resolution of the City Council. b. Use of Funds. In-lieu fees shall be used to fund and maintain shared parking facilities within the ECR/C Parking District.n/a The required parking is provided 1. Unbundling Parking from Residential Uses. Parking in excess of one space per unit may be sold or rented separate from the residential unit. All spaces shall be reserved for residential tenants on the same site.yes complies complies complies All spaces not dedicated to Childcare or Market Hall will be unbundled and Developer will provide a Parking Management and Monitoring Plan as required per code. H. Required Parking. Required parking for any use in ERC/C sub-districts shall be established by the Chief Planner based on the particular characteristics of the proposed use and any other relevant data regarding parking demand. The Chief Planner may require the provision of parking studies or any other information at the applicant’s cost as needed to assess parking demand for the proposed project. Where a Conditional Use Permit is required for the use, the Planning Commission will establish the ultimate parking requirement during the Conditional Use Permit application process. Generally, parking shall not exceed two spaces per unit for residential uses and one space per 300 square feet of commercial use. Parking Ratio: 1.12; Retail Parking: 27 spaces (1 space/480 sf) provided with retail garage. The rest of the required 16 parking spaces will be on extended Oak Ave Parking Ratio: 1.15 Parking Ratio: 0.72 See also building tabulations 5. All ground floor residential units shall have the primary entrance, either individual or shared, facing the public street, BART right-of-way, or a pedestrian connection... Yes 4. In residential mixed-use developments, entrances to residential units shall be physically separated from the entrances to the permitted commercial uses and clearly... Yes 3. Entrances located at corners shall generally be located at a 45 degree angle to the corner and shall have a distinct architectural treatment to animate the intersectio... Yes 2. Building entrances shall be emphasized with small entry plazas, vertical massing, and architectural elements such as awnings, arcades, or porticos.Yes 1. Buildings shall be oriented to face public streets and the BART right-of-way. Residential development adjacent to public spaces or connections shall be oriented facing... Yes G. Building Orientation and Entrances.- F. Exterior Building Materials and Colors....Yes See material board b. The maximum length of the blank wall may be 30 feet for retail establishments with a gross floor area of 25,000 square feet or greater. 1. Exceptions....30' wide Mural/ Community Art wall See Building B Elevation E. Blank Walls. No wall facing streets and the BART right-of-way may run in a continuous plane for more than 20 feet without an opening. Openings fulfilling this...Yes See also Building elevations 2. Windows or portions of windows, located between the sidewalk and two feet above the sidewalk may be glazed.Yes 1. Comprised of clear, nonreflective windows that allow views of indoor space between two and 12 feet above the sidewalk.Yes D. Building Transparency and Required Openings. A minimum of 60 percent of building façades facing streets and the BART right-of-way containing nonresidential uses...See also Building elevations C. Depth of Required Commercial Frontage. The minimum average depth of the required commercial frontage shall be 75 feet, or 65 feet for parcels less than 100 feet in...Yes 4. Exceptions. The Chief Planner may approve a reduced frontage of 50 percent to allow for fire access, driveways, and for efficient site layout and site configuration. Exceptions beyond that are subject to Planning Commission approval.tbd Market hall + Market plaza facing oak ave is more than 50% of the frontage of site. Given the Phase 2 elevation requirements for Oak Avenue, active frontage along the raised road will be nearly infeasible 3. Oak Avenue. A minimum of 65 percent of the frontage of a site along Oak Avenue shall be devoted to active uses.tbd tbd - see below n/a n/a 2. BART Right-of-Way South of Oak Avenue. A minimum of 75 percent of the frontage of a site along the BART right-of-way south of Oak shall be devoted to active uses. n/a 1. El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue. A minimum of 65 percent of the frontage of a site along El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue shall be devoted to active uses. n/a B. Required Active Frontage. Active uses shall be located along the building frontage along primary streets, or facing public open spaces or plazas, and should incorporate ground-floor retail, civic uses, cultural uses, or other amenities with direct sidewalk access and some sidewalk visibility through use of transparent fenestration.yes Market hall, Entry lobby and residential units with Stoops Entry lobby, residential Units with stoops and Daycare Entry lobby and residential Units with stoops A. Building Bulk. The maximum lot coverage of the portion of a building above 45 feet to 80 feet from finished grade shall not exceed 80 percent of the lot area. Exceptions and modifications to dimensional standards of up to 10 percent may be granted by the Chief Planner, based on the finding that adequate design features have been incorporated to create visual variety and void a large-scale, bulky or monolithic appearance. Exceptions beyond 10 percent are subject to Planning Commission approval.yes complies complies complies See plans, elevations & renderings 20.270.005 Supplemental Regulations—ECR/C Area Plan ii. Common Open Space. The space shall be accessible to the living units on the lot. It shall be served by any stairway or other access way qualifying as an egress... Yes complies complies complies i. Private Open Space. The space shall be accessible to only one living unit by a doorway to a habitable room or hallway.Yes complies complies complies a. Accessibility.Yes 2. Usability. A surface shall be provided that allows convenient use for outdoor living and/or recreation. Such surface may be any practicable combination of lawn, garde... Yes complies complies complies b. Common Open Space. Minimum dimension of 20 feet.Yes complies complies complies a. Private Open Space. Private open space located on the ground level (e.g., yards, decks, patios) shall have no dimension less than 10 feet. Private open space located... Yes Private open space complies Private open space complies No private open space 1. Minimum Dimensions.Yes G. Residential Usable Open Space. A minimum of 150 square feet of usable open space is required per residential unit and may be provided as common or private open... Yes F. Tower Dimension and Separation. The maximum dimension of the portion of a building above 80 feet from finished grade shall not exceed 125 feet and must be... See above See above E. Corner Build Area. Buildings must be located in accordance with the required setbacks within 30 feet of every corner. Public plazas may be at the street corner provided... See above 3. For any wall containing living room or other primary room windows, a setback of at least 15 feet shall be provided.Yes 2. For any wall containing bedroom windows, a setback of at least 10 feet shall be provided.Yes 1. For any wall containing windows, a setback of at least five feet shall be provided.Yes D. Required Side and Rear Yards for Residential Uses. In order to provide light and air for residential units, the following minimum setbacks apply to any building wall containing windows and facing an interior side or rear yard. The following setbacks shall be provided:Yes At west side of C2, building is within setback but lot is adjacent to BART easement, therefore light & air are maintained 4. The building incorporates an alternative entrance design that creates a welcoming entry feature facing the street.Yes 3. Entry courtyards, plazas, entries, or outdoor eating and display areas are located between the build-to line and building, provided that the buildings are built to the edg... Yes 2. Substantial landscaping is located between the build-to line and ground floor residential units to soften visual impact of buildings;Yes 1. The established street wall along El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue is not interrupted;n/a C. Build-to Line. Buildings shall be constructed at the required setback for at least 65 percent of linear street frontage. The area between the building and property line...See plans, elevations & renderings Standard (per Sub-District)ECR/C-RH Additional Standards B C1 C2 Lot, Density, and FAR Standards - ECR/C Are Planh Sub-Districts Additional Notes/ Comments Project Address: 1051 Mission Road Zoning: High Density Residential Proposal Compliance for Project (please fill out Yes, No, or NA) Please stipulate how the proposal complies (i.e. provide specific lot/parcel data, measurements, etc.) City of SSF -Conformance Development Checklist for El Camino Real / Chestnut Area Plan Districts 26 R16'-6" 10'-0"8'-0"8'-6" R4 4 ' - 6 " 144145146147 51 +58.6 +69 +64.1 +63.7 +59.5 +59.1 +59+55 +54.6 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 52 54 53 55 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 MISSION RD MISSION RD 30 30 1 4 2.6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K M L BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE CONTEXT - PHOTOS 2019 G0408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 A B C D E F G H J K L M I 27 PARCEL 1 - BUILDING C2 PARCEL 2 - BUILDING C1 PARCEL 3 - BUILDING B MISSION ROAD C O L M A C R E E K E L C A M I N O R E A L ANTOINETTE LANE K A I S E R P E R M A N E N T E FUTURE CIVIC CAMPUS SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT SAN MATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT SANTO CRISTO SOCIETY HALL GRAND AVE DEL PASO DRIVE CH E S T N U T A V E A R R O Y O D R I V E WE S T B O R O U G H B L V D O A K A V E BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE CONTEXT 2019 G0508/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 28 STOPSTOP STOP STOP 30 30 4 7.3 4 2 6,583 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE3,623 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS W/ LESS THAN 20' MIN DIM NOT INCLUDED EVA STOOPS W/ MIN DIM LESS THAN 10' 5,152 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE BLDG C2 BUILDING C1 BUILDING B 2,518 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 5,135 SF DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA3,383 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 19,339 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE2,895 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 10,636 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 486 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 867 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 6,845 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 10,342 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (4) OPEN SPACE LEGEND COMMON OPEN SPACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 11,665 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE NON-COMPLIANT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYP BALCONIES AS SHOWN PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 4,880 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE NON-COMPLIANT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NOT COUNTED 7,485 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE BALCONIES AS SHOWN 650 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 3,126 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE 1,510 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS 2019 G0608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 LEVEL 1 OPEN SPACE NOTES: 1. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: MIN 10' DIM IF ON GROUND LEVEL 2. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: MIN 6' DIM IF ABOVE GRADE 3. COMMON OPEN SPACE: MIN 20' DIM 4. USABILITY.A SURFACE SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ALLOWS CONVENIENT USE FOR OUTDOOR LIVING AND/OR RECREATION. 5. ADDITIONAL BALCONIES MAY OCCUR, SEE ELEVATIONS & BUILDING PLANS. 6. NON-COMPLIANT BALCONIES/STOOPS NOT INCLUDED IN OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS. OPEN SPACE CALCS TYPE BLDG AREA COUNT COMMON OPEN SPACE B 32,010 SF 4 COMMON OPEN SPACE C1 54,084 SF 8 COMMON OPEN SPACE C2 23,881 SF 6 109,975 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE B 3,137 SF 40 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE C1 7,278 SF 22 10,415 SF GRAND TOTAL 120,390 SF LEVEL 2 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 3 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 4 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 5 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 6 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 8 OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE REQ'D 35,100 61,200 23,700 120,000 OPEN SPACE REQ'D/UNIT 150 150 150 # UNITS 234 408 158 800 BLDG B C1 C2 TOTALS OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS (REQ'D) 29 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PROJECT DATA - BUILDING B 2019 G0708/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ** As calculated in the Preliminary Building Area Tabulation * Unit GSF includes exterior, corridor and party walls Average Unit Size (GSF)795 Residential GSF** 186,141 AVERAGE UNIT SIZE %7%70%21%3% 100% 16 163 48 7 234 TOTAL 6 6 4 70 30 52 11 43 5 6 1 234 B 0 1 3 1 4 2 2 7 9 3 1 1 2 10 5 7 1 8 1 36 4 1 1 12 5 7 2 8 1 1 38 5 1 1 12 5 7 2 8 1 1 38 6 1 1 12 5 7 2 8 1 1 38 7 1 1 12 5 7 2 8 1 1 38 8 1 1 12 5 7 2 3 1 1 33 445 GSF 590 GSF 680 GSF 715 GSF 655 GSF TYP 760 GSF TYP 560 & 600 GSF 1,045 GSF 1,220 GSF 1,245 GSF 1,430 GSF 15' x 30' 34'4" x 24' 24'6" x 33'4" 24' x 30' 20' x 33' 30' x 25'6" 40' x 40' puzzle 35' x 30' 49'8" x 39'8" 36' x 35'4" 60'2" x 24' S1 S2 S3 A1 A2 A4 A7 B1 B9 C2 C6 TOTAL LEVEL STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 3 BR 3 BR UNIT PRELIMINARY UNIT MIX* **** Garage Total GSF includes all spaces inside garage footprint, such as mechanical/utility spaces, etc *** Residential Core GSF include corridors, residential level lobbies, stairs, elevators, res. level utility spaces, etc ** Residential Amenity GSF includes entry lobby, leasing office, club room, fitness room, etc * Residential Net Rentable GSF calculation includes exterior, corridor and party walls NOTES: Total 186,141 6,497 50,690 243,328 12,992 86,129 342,449 B 10,012 10,012 36,802 46,814 1 3,644 2,229 6,993 12,866 9,361 24,003 46,230 2 5,955 5,450 11,405 3,631 25,324 40,360 3 28,542 2,174 4,795 35,511 35,511 4 30,644 4,688 35,332 35,332 5 30,644 4,688 35,332 35,332 6 30,644 4,688 35,332 35,332 7 30,644 4,688 35,332 35,332 8 25,424 2,094 4,688 32,206 32,206 Level Net Rentable GSF* Amenity GSF** Core GSF*** Total GSF Total GSF Total GSF**** GSF Residential Residential Residential Residential RETAIL Garage Grand Total PRELIMINARY BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS 8/12/2019 * Accessible stalls included in "required" and "provided" parking calculations Total Accessible Parking Provided 9 Total Accessible Parking Required 7 Retail Parking (at 1:25 stalls)27 1:25 2 Residential Parking at 2% of stalls 262 2%5 Stall count Percent PARKING STALLS Accessible Total ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATION* PARKING RATIO 1.12 RETAIL PARKING:27 TOTAL RES:262 Total 25 2 48 7 207 289 B 4 4 187 195 1 25 2 1 1 20 49 2 43 2 45 8.5' x 17' MIN. 9' x 18' MIN. 8.5' x 18' MIN. 9' x 18' MIN. Level Retail Retail Acc Residential Residential Acc Stacker Total PARKING STALLS ON-SITE STALL DISTRIBUTION * Secured Class I spaces. Total Bike Parking Provided 234 Total Bike Parking Required 59 One space per four Dwelling Units 234 1:1 234 Required Unit Ratio Provided BIKE PARKING* Bike Total BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS* 30 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PROJECT DATA- BUILDING C1 2019 G0808/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 *** Unit dimensions and areas are for the most typical variation ** As calculated in the Preliminary Building Area Tabulation * Unit GSF includes exterior, corridor and party walls Average Unit Size (GSF) 867 Residential GSF** 353,630 AVERAGE UNIT SIZE %13%46%33%5% 3% 100% 53 186 134 22 13 408 TOTAL 53 100 3 17 49 5 7 5 54 11 3 20 14 7 7 4 14 5 2 7 7 1 13 408 B1 0 1 4 13 17 2 5 13 2 7 1 1 1 11 1 5 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 56 3 6 15 1 2 7 1 1 1 11 2 5 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 62 4 7 16 1 3 8 1 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 1 1 3 1 1 63 5 7 16 1 3 8 1 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 1 1 3 1 1 63 6 7 15 3 8 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 54 7 11 13 2 6 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 48 8 10 12 2 5 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45 450 GSF *** 720 GSF 660 GSF TYP 710 GSF TYP 750 GSF TYP 690 GSF 960 GSF 770 GSF 1,050 GSF 1,000 GSF TYP 1,050 GSF 1,055 GSF TYP 875 GSF TYP 1,740 GSF TYP 940 GSF TYP 1,320 GSF 1,190 GSF 1,305 GSF 1,255 GSF 1,200 GSF 1,015 GSF 1,385 GSF - 15' x 30' 24' x 30' 20' x 33' 34'6" x 20'6" 30' x 25' 23' x 30' 32' x 30' 37' x 20'9" 35' x 30' 40' x 25' 42' x 25' 29' x 36'4" 43'8" x 20' 58' x 30' 37'8" x 25' 44' x 30' 39'9" x 30' 43'6" x 30' 36'4" x 34'6" 40' x 30' 32' x 31'9" 66' x 21' various sizes S1 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 LW 1-6 TOTAL LEVEL STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 3 BR 3 BR 3 BR 3 BR 3 BR LIVEWORK UNIT PRELIMINARY UNIT MIX* **** Garage Total GSF includes all spaces inside garage footprint, such as mechanical/utility spaces, etc *** Residential Core GSF include corridors, residential level lobbies, stairs, elevators, res. level utility spaces, etc ** Residential Amenity GSF includes entry lobby, leasing office, club room, fitness room, etc * Residential Net Rentable GSF calculation includes exterior, corridor and party walls NOTES: Total 353,630 9,934 97,198 460,762 8,372 87,888 557,022 B1 16,003 16,003 44,936 60,939 1 17,845 3,689 11,354 32,888 8,372 42,952 84,212 2 52,676 2,885 11,655 67,216 67,216 3 58,031 12,003 70,034 70,034 4 53,295 11,051 64,346 64,346 5 53,295 11,051 64,346 64,346 6 44,406 2,355 9,714 56,475 56,475 7 38,102 1,005 7,346 46,453 46,453 8 35,980 7,021 43,001 43,001 Level Net Rentable GSF* Amenity GSF** Core GSF*** Total GSF Total GSF Total GSF**** GSF Residential Residential Residential Residential Day Care Garage Grand Total PRELIMINARY BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS 8/12/2019 * Accessible stalls included in "required" and "provided" parking calculations Total Accessible Parking Provided 12 Total Accessible Parking Required 10 Daycare Parking (at 1:25 stalls)5 1:25 1 Residential Parking at 2% of stalls 468 2%9 Stall count Percent PARKING STALLS Accessible Total ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATION* PARKING RATIO:1.15 DAYCARE PARKING:7 TOTAL RES:468 Total 5 2 35 10 423 475 0 B1 0 0 0 8 305 313 1 5 2 35 2 118 162 - 9' x 18' MIN. 8.5' x 18' MIN. 9' x 18' MIN. Level Day Care Day Care Acc Residential Resid Acces Stacker Total PARKING STALLS ON-SITE STALL DISTRIBUTION PARKING * Secured Class I spaces. Total Bike Parking Provided 408 Total Bike Parking Required 102 One space per four Dwelling Units 408 1:1 408 Required Unit Ratio Provided BIKE PARKING*Bike Total BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS* 31 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PROJECT DATA- BUILDING C2 2019 G0908/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ** As calculated in the Preliminary Building Area Tabulation * Unit GSF includes exterior, corridor and party walls Average Unit Size (GSF)894 Residential GSF** 141,227 AVERAGE UNIT SIZE %12%28%34%25%100% 19 45 54 40 158 TOTAL 19 45 27 21 4 2 37 3 158 1 4 2 3 3 1 13 2 3 10 2 3 1 6 1 26 3 4 9 4 3 1 7 1 29 4 5 8 4 3 1 6 27 5 5 8 7 3 1 6 30 6 1 3 7 3 1 5 20 7 1 3 1 3 1 4 13 0 405 GSF TYP 655 GSF 895 GSF 935 GSF 1,065 GSF TYP 1,210 GSF 1,220 GSF TYP 1,205 GSF 15' x 27'6" 24' x 27'6" 34' x 27'6" 26'4" x 36' 36'2" x 32'6" 62'4" x 21'6" 46' x 27'6" 36' x 39'4" AF S1 AF A1 AF B1 AF B2 AF B3 AF B4 AF C1 AF C2 TOTAL LEVEL STUDIO 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 3 BR 3 BR UNIT PRELIMINARY UNIT MIX* **** Garage Total GSF includes all spaces inside garage footprint, such as mechanical/utility spaces, etc *** Residential Core GSF include corridors, residential level lobbies, stairs, elevators, res. level utility spaces, etc ** Residential Amenity GSF includes entry lobby, leasing office, club room, fitness room, etc * Residential Net Rentable GSF calculation includes exterior, corridor and party walls NOTES: Total 141,227 3,144 40,136 184,507 19,515 204,022 1 9,661 850 12,174 22,685 19,515 42,200 2 27,394 2,294 5,982 35,670 35,670 3 29,666 5,944 35,610 35,610 4 21,654 4,751 26,405 26,405 5 21,654 4,751 26,405 26,405 6 15,599 3,267 18,866 18,866 7 15,599 3,267 18,866 18,866 Level Net Rentable GSF* Amenity GSF** Core GSF*** Total GSF Total GSF**** GSF Residential Residential Residential Residential Garage Grand Total PRELIMINARY BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS 8/12/2019 * Accessible stalls included in "required" and "provided" parking calculations Total Accessible Parking Provided 2 Total Accessible Parking Required 2 Residential Parking at 2% of stalls 115 2%2 Stall count Percent PARKING STALLS Accessible Total ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATION* PARKING RATIO 0.73 Total 0 2 113 115 0 1 0 2 113 115 0 0 8.5' x 18' MIN. 9' x 18' MIN. Level Residential Residential Acc Stacker Total PARKING STALLS ON-SITE STALL DISTRIBUTION PARKING * Secured Class I spaces. Total Bike Parking Provided 158 Total Bike Parking Required 40 One space per four Dwelling Units 158 1:1 158 Required Unit Ratio Provided BIKE PARKING*Bike Total BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS* 32 STOP STOP 30 30 4 7.3 4 1 4 2.6 5 8% MISSION ROAD EVA HAMMERHEAD 9 5 ' - 0 " BUILDING HEIGHT MEASURED FROM EVA STAGING AREA IN FRONT OF BLDG LOBBIES, AS PERTAINS TO HIGH-RISE CLASSIFICATION 2 6 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 7 2'-0" 1 5 0'-0" 26'-0" BLDG C2 BLDG C1 BLDG B BUILDING HEIGHT MEASURED FROM EVA STAGING AREA IN FRONT OF BLDG LOBBIES, AS PERTAINS TO HIGH-RISE CLASSIFICATION MARKET HALL BLDG LOBBYBLDG LOBBY STANDPIPE FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT OAK AVE (E) FIRE HYDRANT (E) FIRE HYDRANT R 150'-0" R 150'-0" GR A N D AV E 20'-0"2 0 ' - 0 " R 2 6 '-0 "R 26'-0" R 26'-0" TYP 26'-0" 116'-2" 30'-9" 1 4 7 ' - 7 " 139'-6"72'-7" FIRE HYDRANT (150' MAX FROM EVA STAGING AREA) LOBBY ENTRY GA R A G E E N T R Y GARAGE ENTRY LOBBY ENTRY R E S G A R A G E E N T R Y RETAIL GARAGE ENTRY L O B B Y E N T R Y EVA HAMMERHEAD 9 0 ' - 0 " 2 6 '-0 " 1 5 0 '-0 " C L 1 5 0 '-0 " 1 5 0 '-0 " R 2 8'-0" 2 0 '-0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 7 0 ' - 0 " L O A D I N G 1 4 2 '-6 " FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT LOBBY DAYCARE FIRE HYDRANT STANDPIPE MARKET HALL ENTRY B L D G L O B B Y EVA (EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS) LANES FIRE HYDRANT WHARF FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND 20' 40' 80' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 5 : 0 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FIRE ACCESS SITE PLAN 2019 G1008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 33 3HR FIREWALL 3HR FIREWALL 3H R FI R E W A L L 3HR FIREWALL 3HR FIREWALL 3H R FI R E W A L L 3H R FI R E W A L L3HRFIREWALL3HRFIREWALL3 H R F I R E W A L L 3 H R F I R E W A L L / H E 3HR FIREWALL 212' 212' 212' 176'222'215' 164' 11 0 ' 128' 11 5 ' 14 4 ' 195' 2 0 2 ' 100' BLDG C2 BLDG C1 BLDG B EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCEEXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 5 : 0 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FIRE ACCESS FLOOR PLAN, TYP 2019 G1108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 34 MISSION RD MISSION RD 30 1 4 2.6 5 DAYCARE MARKET HALL RETAIL GARAGE RES. GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE LOBBY LOBBY LOBBY 50 ' X 1 2 ' L O A D I N G 50'X12' LOADING TRASH ROOM 50 ' X 1 2 ' L O A D I N G D R O P O F F D R O P OFF D R O P O F F DROP OFF 50'X12' TIMED MARKET LOADING 5 0 'X 1 2 ' L O A D I N G DR O P O F F D R O P OFF D R O P O F F LOBBY ENTRY GA R A G E E N T R Y GARAGE ENTRY LOBBY ENTRY RETAIL GARAGE ENTRY L O B B Y E N T R Y R E S . G A R A G E E N T R Y BUILDING C2 BUILDING C1 BUILDING B TRASH ROOM TRASH ROOM 50'X12' LOADING TRASH ROOM TRASH ROOM 5 0 'X 1 2 ' L O A D I N G RETAIL TRASH ROOM 50'X12' LOADING VEHICULAR CIRCULATION - COMMERCIAL AND GUEST VEHICULAR CIRCULATION - RESIDENT ONLY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION - PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION - PUBLIC COMMERCIAL LOADING CIRCULATION PLAN LEGEND RESIDENTIAL AND TRASH LOADING MAINTENANCE ROAD DROP OFF TRASH ROOM BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 5 : 1 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE CIRCULATION & ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS 2019 G1208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 40'-0" DIAGRAM - SITE CIRCULATION / ACTIVE USE 35 B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 08/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 VICINITY MAP VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP T-1 36 34 RSM 1-61 34 RSM 1-61 B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 06/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN T-2 37 Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 08/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Þ SITE AND GRADING PLAN T-3 38 Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 06/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SITE AND GRADING PLAN T-4 Þ 39 DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN 8% 8% LOADI N G B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 08/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 UTILITY PLAN T-5 40 B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 08/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 UTILITY PLAN T-6 41 DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN 8% 8% LOADI N G B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 08/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN T-7 Þ 42 Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü B AR architects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 2018 06/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 PHASE 2 OAK AVENUE EXTENSION T-8 43 44 45 46 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L1.0 OVERALL ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 2 / L2.0 3 / L3.0 1 / L3.0 1 / L4.0 1 / L2.0 2 / L3.0 2 / L4.0 MISSION ROAD DROP-OFF PLAYGROUND COLMA C R E E K SCULPTURE LAWN FITNESS COURT LIVE WORK TER R A C E CHILD CARE CHILD C A R E PLAY A R E A CENTEN N I A L T R A I L MARKE T H A L L PLAZA MARKE T H A L L ANTOINE T T E LANE BUILDI N G B OA K A V E SH A R E D P L A Z A EL CAMINO REAL CHILD CARE DRO P - O F F BUILDING C1 BUILDING C2 BART TUNNEL BEL O W KAISER PA R K I N G G A R A G E BART BUILDING CIVIL CENTER BUILDING 20’ 0 40’ 80’ EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY 47 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L2.0 ENLARGEMENT GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN BUILDING C2 NORTH PASEO ENLARGEMENT PLAN2 1 MID - PASEO ENLARGEMENT PLAN 20’-0” STREET TREE FIRE ACCESS ZONE TURF BLOCK PARK PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT 6’ TALL WOOD AND METAL PARK CONCRETE PATHWAY SHRUB SCREENING STREET LIGHT MISSION ROADMISSION ROAD SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING FOR BLDG C1 (10) BIKE RACKS (20) SPACES SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING FOR BLDG C2 (6) BIKE RACKS (12) SPACES 6’ 6’ 4’ 8’ 20’ TYP 10’ 26’8’3’5’7’ 8’3’5’7’ 16.5’ 3’ DROP-OFF ZONE/AUTO COURT VEHICULAR CONC. UNIT PAVERS, TYPE 1 VEHICULAR CONC. UNIT PAVERS, TYPE 2 3’ WIDE TRUNCATED DOMES WARNING PAVER TEMPORARY PARKING/ PASSENGER LOADING VEHICULAR CONCRETE PAVING BIO-RETENTION IN-GROUND TRANSFORMER, TYP GARAGE ENTRANCE SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING FOR BLDG C1 (5) BIKE RACKS (10) BIKE PARKING SPACES SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING FOR BLDG C2 (4) BIKE RACKS (8) BIKE PARKING SPACES BUILDING C1 8’ 0 16’ 32’ 48 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L3.0 ENLARGEMENT GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 1 2 ’ 3 ’ 1 2 ’ 3 ’ COMMUNITY PARK ENLARGEMENT PLAN CENTENNIAL TRAIL GATHERING PLAZA ENLARGEMENT PLAN PICNIC AREA AND BUILDING B RESIDENT LOADING AREA ENLARGEMENT PLAN 3 2 1 FOCAL POINT SCULPTURE FITNESS STATION WITH RESILIENT SURFACING CONCRETE PAVING AT CENTENNIAL TRAIL LIVE WORK TERRACE BART TUNNEL BELOW LIGHT POLE MOUNTED DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING (6) BIKE RACKS (12) SPACES LIGHT POLE MOUNT- ED DIRECTIONAL SIG - FIRE ACCESS HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND SEATWALL INTEGRATED DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 5-12 YEARS OLD PLAYGROUND BUILT-IN SEATING PARK PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT BUILDING C1 (2) PARK BENCHES MULTI-USE LAWN (2) PARK BENCHES PICNIC TABLE AND BENCH SHADE TREES CENTEN N I A L T R A I L CHILD C A R E P L A Y A R E A CENTEN N I A L T R A I L COLMA C R E E K COL M A C R E E K CEN T E N N I A L T R A I L CEN T E N N I A L T R A I L CENTENNIAL TRAIL PEDESTRIAN LIGHT 1 2 ’ BIKE SHARE STATION (4) SPACE 6’ TALL WOOD FENCE 6’ TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE EXISTING BRIDGE TO REMAIN SEATWALL INTEGRATED DIRECTION- AL SIGNAGE CENTENNIAL TRAIL PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT FENCE FIRE TRUCK HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND RESIDENT LOADING CENTENNIAL TRAILPLAY STRUCTURE WITH RESILIENCE SURFACING CENTENNIAL TRAIL PEDESTRI- AN POLE LIGHT6’ TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING B COLMA C R E E K MISSION STREET 20’ 26’ EVA EA S E M E N T O N B A R T P R O P E R T Y BART T U N N E L B E L O W EVA EA S E M E N T O N B A R T P R O P E R T Y BART T U N N E L B E L O W EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY 8’ 0 16’ 32’ 49 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L4.0 ENLARGEMENT GROUND FLOOR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN OAK AVE SHARED STREET & MARKET HALL PLAZA ENLARGEMENT PLAN OAK AVE SHARED STREET & OAK AVE GRAND STAIR ENLARGEMENT PLAN21 MARK E T H A L L MARK E T H A L L P L A Z A CENTE N N I A L T R A I L C O N N E C T I O N SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING AT BLDG B (8) BIKE RACKS (16) SPACES BIO-RETENTION & TREE GROVE VEHICULAR CONCRETE UNIT PAVER W/ ACCENT COLOR BAND 3’ WIDE WARNING PAVER SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING AT BLDG B (7) BIKE RACK (14) BIKE PARKING SPACES OA K A V E PA S S E N G E R L O A D I N G OA K A V E LIM I T O F W O R K LI M I T O F W O R K 5% SLOPED WALK TRUNCATED DOMES WARNING PAVER/ DROP OFF AREA BUILDING B DRIVEWAY BART TUNNEL BELOW 73’ O A K A V E R . O . W . EL CAMINO REAL CIVIC CENTER DEVEOPMENT CIVIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT TURF BLOCK IN PARKING STALL 6’ 7’ 16’ 26’ 16’ 2’ PARK I N G OVERH A N G A T PLANTI N G 2’ PARK I N G OVER H A N G A T PLAN T I N G OAK AVE PED AND VEH POLE LIGHT IN-GROUND TRANSFORMER RESTING ALCOVE WITH BENCHES LIGHTED BOLLARDS TO DELINEATE BIKE ROUTE THROUGH PLAZA ANTOINETTE BUILDI N G B +69 UP UP +58.6 +51 CENTE N N I A L TRAIL COLM A C R E E K MATCHLINE SEE 1/ L4.0 SEE 2/ L4.0 MATCHLINE OA K A V E 73’ OAK AVE R. O . W . F I R E S T A G I N G 2 6 ’ x 9 0 ’ EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY EVA EASEMENT ON BART PROPERTY EVA E A S E M E N T O N B A R T P R O P E R T Y EASEMENT ON KAISER PROPERTY EASEMENT ON KA I S E R P R O P E R T Y OAK AND BUCKEYE GROVE CONCRETE STAIR WITH STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAIL BART ACCESS DRIVE TO REMAIN 12’ MU L T I - U S E PAT H 26’ 16’ 17’ 2’ 5% SLOPED WALK 5% SLOPED WA L K 5% SLOPED WALK +59.1 +59 +59.5 63.7+ 64.1+ 54.6+ 55+ 8’ 0 16’ 32’ 50 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 ENLARGEMENT PODIUM ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN L5.08’ 0 16’ 32’ BUILDING C1 LEVEL 2 PODIUM LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN KEY PLAN 1 BUILDING C1 PLANTING IN FRONT OF UNIT TO PROVIDE PRIVACY CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS ON PODIUM SCREENING PLANTS CASCADE PLANTING TERRACE WOOD DECKING WITH TABLE AND CHAIRS RAISED PLANTER WITH BUILT-IN BENCH LOW PLANTING UNDER THE BUILDING OVERHANG SHADE TREES BBQ, SINK AND COUNTER SCREENING PLANTS TO PROVIDE PRIVACY FOR THE UNITS STEEL PLANTER SEATING POCKET WITH FIRE PIT AND CHAIRS OVERHEAD STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE SHADE WITH TABLE AND CHAIRS UNDERNEATH OUTDOOR FURNITURE/ GATHERING SPACE STEEL PLANTER WITH SCREENING PLANTS TO CREATE PRIVACY SHADE TREES PING PONG TABLE STEEL RAISED PLANTER FITNESS UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNITUNIT TRASH MEP BLDG C1BLDG C2 BLDG B COLMA CREEK MISSION RO A D EL CAMINO R E A L 51 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 ENLARGEMENT PODIUM ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN L6.08’ 0 16’ 32’ OVERHEAD STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE SHADE PLANTING IN FRONT OF UNIT TO PROVIDE PRIVACY CONCRETE UNIT PAVER ON PODIUM PLANTING IN FRONT OF UNIT TO PROVIDE PRIVACY CONCRETE UNIT PAVER ON PODIUM BBQ, SINK AND COUNTER WOOD DECKING COMMUNAL TABLE AND CHAIRS OUTDOOR FURNITURE/ GATHERING SPACE GRAVEL BAND BETWEEN PLANTER AND BUILDING RAISED PLANTER WITH SHADE TREES BBQ, SINK AND COUNTER WOOD DECKING WITH TABLE AND CHAIRS RAISED PLANTER AND BUILT-IN BENCH ART/ SCULPTURE RAISED PLANTER WITH BUILT-IN BENCH FIRE PLACE AND SEATINGPLANTER POTS PLANTER POTS KEY PLAN BUILDING C2 LEVEL 2 PODIUM ENLARGEMENT PLANBUILDING B LEVEL 3 PODIUM ENLARGEMENT PLAN 11 BLDG C1BLDG C2 BLDG B COLMA CREEK 1/L6.0 2/L6.0 MISSION RO A D EL CAMINO R E A L BUILDING B 52 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L7.0 PLANTING PLAN AND LEGEND Phoenix canariensis Tristania laurina Elymus glaucus Heteromeles arbutifolia Beschorneria yuccoides Cornus sericea Aloe arborescens Chondropetalum elephantinum Lomandra hystrix ‘Tropicbelle‘ Carex. tumulicola Eriophyllum staechadifolium Muhlenbergia emersleyi Agave desmettiana Baccharis pilularis ‘Pigeon Point’ Corylus cornuta Dymondia margaretae Fragaria chiloensis <XFFD¿ODPHQWRVDµ&RORU*DUG¶ Muhlenbergia emersleyi /Native Bentgrass Mix by Delta Bluegrass Company /\RQRWKDPQXVÀRULEXQGXV subsp. asplenifolius Cupressus macrocarpa Plantanus x acerifolia Quercus agrifolia & Aesculus californica *LQNJRELORED Araucaria araucana Myrica californica Corymbia spp. Canary Island Date Palm Water Gum Blue Wild Rye Toyon PLANTING AND IRRIGATION NOTE: 1.Soft scape calculation Total Softscape Area: 88,441.62 sq ft Total Lawn Area: 16,871 sq ft Total Lawn Area/ Total Softscape Area = 19.08% 2. The Above Plants have been selected as being rep- resentative of the overall planting design intent. This plant Palette is being suggested for use but should not preclude use of other appropriate plant material. The plans are to be in conformance with the city 20.300.007 Landscaping ordinance regarding Drought Tolerant Land- scaping. Planting Must not include any toxic and invasive species as commonly defined by the City’s Arborist. 3. All planting areas with the exception of those shown with stone mulch are to receive 3” of organic bark mulch. Stabilizing mulch products shall be applied to slope of 3:1 or greater. 4. The irrigation system shall be installed in conformance with all applicable state, local codes and ordinance by licensed contractors and experienced workmen. Contrac- tor shall obtain and pay for all permits and fee relating to this work. 5. All planting will irrigated by drip irrigation and bubbler. Mexican Lily Red Stem Dogwood Torch Aloe Large Cape Rush Tropic Belle Mat Rush Berkeley Sedge Lizard Tail Gooding’s Muhly Smooth Agave Dwarf Coyote Brush Beaked Hazelnut Dymondia Beach Strawberry Color Guard Yucca Bull Grass Trees Bioretention Shrubs and Groundcover Regular Planting Shrubs and Groundcover Lawn Catalina Ironwood Monterey Cypress London Plane Tree Coast Live Oak & Buckeye Gingko Monkey Puzzle Tree Pacific Wax Myrtle Gum 39 6 11 32 7 6 40 7 9 11 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 48” box 24” box Moderate Low Low Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low Low SYMBOL SYMBOLBOTANIAL NAME BOTANIAL NAMECOMMON NAME COMMON NAMEQUANTITYSIZEWATER USE MISSION ROAD COLMA C R E E K EL CAMINO REAL CIVIL CENTER BUILDING 20’ 0 40’ 80’ 53 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L8.0 MATERIAL PLAN AND LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION NOTESSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONNOTES Concrete pavement Type 1 Centennial Trail City Standard Sidewalk Park Live-Work Terrace Auto Court Shared Street at Market Hall Auto Court Shared Street at Market Hall Parking Area / Fire Lane Warning Paver Concrete pavement Type 2 Rubberized Surfacing Concrete pavement Type 3 Sculpture Unit Paver 1 Type 1 Pot Unit Paver 2 Type 2 Accent Pole Light Unit Paver 3 Type 3 Picnic Table Turf Block Bench BUILDING C1 BUILDING C2 BUILDI N G B 20’ 0 40’ 80’ 54 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 06/19/19 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PALETTE L8.1NTS PAVING MATERIAL CONCRETE PAVING PLANTER POT PICNIC TABLE AND CHAIRS BENCHES CONCRETE UNIT PAVER WARNING PAVER TURF BLOCK RUBBERIZED SURFACING SITE FURNISHING CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 2 - CITY STANDARD SIDEWALK NATURAL GRAY WITH SILICA CARBIDE & WATER JET FINISH CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 1 - CENTENNIAL TRAIL NATURAL GRAY WITH STEEL TROWEL FINISH UNIT PAVER TYPE 1 - LIVE WORK SPACE 6X12 PAVER WITH GROUND AND BLASTED FINISH RUNNING BOND PATTERN CAST IRON WARNING PAVER CONCRETE UNIT PAVER WARNING PAVER UNIT PAVER TYPE 2, 3 - AUTOCOURT 6X12 PAVER WITH GROUND AND BLASTED FINISH HERRINGBONE PATTERN UNIT PAVER TYPE 2, 3 - AUTOCOURT 6X12 PAVER WITH GROUND AND BLASTED FINISH HERRINGBONE PATTERN CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 3 - PARK NATURAL GRAY WITH HEAVY SANDBLAST / TOP CAST FINISH 55 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 08/12/19 L9.0 LIGHTING CONCEPT DIAGRAM SYMBOL SYMBOLDESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONNOTES NOTES (L1) Mission Vehicular Pole Lights (City Standard) (L4) Oak Avenue Pedestrian and Vehicular Light (L5) Bollard Light (L6) Wall Mounted Light Note: 7KLVGLDJUDPLVDOLJKWLQJVWUDWHJ\GLDJUDPRQO\2ႈFLDOSKRWRPHWULFVWXG\LVQHHGHGWR¿QDOL]HOLJKW¿[WXUHVTXDQWLWLHVDQGOLJKWPRGHOV 2. Light levels shall meet South San Francisco City standards and comply with Illuminating Engineering Society Standards appropriate to the subject street and open space type. (L7) Catenary Light (L2) Park Pedestrian Pole Light (L3) Centennial Trail Pedestrain Light 20’ 0 40’ 80’ 56 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 06/19/19 L2 PARK PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT (L5) BOLLARD LIGHT PODIUM LEVEL GROUND LEVEL (L6) BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT (L3) CENTENNIAL TRAIL STANDARD PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (L7) CATENARY LIGHT (L4) OAK AVE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR POLE LIGHT (L7) CATENARY LIGHT LIGHTING FIXTURE PRECEDENTS L9.1NTS 57 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 06/19/19 LANDSCAPE PRECEDENTS L10.0NTS FITNESS STATION EXERCISER DECK PODIUM LEVEL GROUND LEVEL PICNIC AREA PODIUM FIRE PLACE AND SEATING IMPROVED LIGHTING PODIUM PLANTER AND PLANTING 5-12 YEARS OLD PLAYGROUND BBQ AND DINNING AREA 58 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 06/19/19 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L11.0NTS TREE PLANTING DETAILGROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAILCMU BLOCK PLANTER ON PODIUM PRECAST PLANTER POT ON PODIUM WOOD AND STEEL FENCE CONCRETE UNIT PAVER ON PODIUM SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 136 7 4 5 2 59 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 : 0 7 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a c h a n g \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ a c h a n g _ B A R . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2018 A30306/10/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 06/19/19 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATION DIAGRAMS L12.0NTS 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE6) COMMON OPEN SPACE $5($6: /(667+$N  0,N',0N27 ,N&/8'('(9$ 672236: 0,N',0/(66 7+$N 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE BLDG C2 BUILDING C1 BUILDING B 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE  OPEN SPACE LEGEND &2002N23(N63$&( 35,9$7(23(N63$&( 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE N2N&203/,$N7 35,9$7(23(N 63$&( PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 7<3     %$/&2N,(6$66+2:NPRIVATE OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE N2N&203/,$N7 35,9$7(23(N63$&( N27&28N7(' 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE %$/&2N,(6$6 6+2:N 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE 6) COMMON OPEN SPACE BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N                 $ 0 &  ? 8 V H U V ? D F K D Q J ? ' R F X P H Q W V ? 6 6 )  0 D V W H U S O D Q B D F K D Q J B % $ 5  U Y W SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS 2018 G0606/20/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 LEVEL 1 OPEN SPACE N27(6 35,9$7(23(N63$&(0,N ',0,)2N*528N'/(9(/ 35,9$7(23(N63$&(0,N ',0,)$%29(*5$'( &2002N23(N63$&(0,N ',0 86$%,/,7<$685)$&(6+$//%(3529,'('7+$7$//2:6&2N9(N,(N786()25 287'225/,9,N*$N'255(&5($7,2N $'',7,2N$/%$/&2N,(60$<2&&856(((/(9$7,2N6 %8,/',N*3/$N6 N2N&203/,$N7%$/&2N,(6672236N27,N&/8'(',N23(N63$&( &$/&8/$7,2N6 23(N63$&(&$/&6 7<3(%/'* $5($ &28N7 &2002N23(N63$&(% 6)  &2002N23(N63$&(& 6)  &2002N23(N63$&(& 6)  6) 35,9$7(23(N63$&(% 6)  35,9$7(23(N63$&(& 6)  6) LEVEL 2 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 3 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 4 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 5 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 6 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE LEVEL 8 OPEN SPACE 23(N63$&(5(4 '    23(N63$&(5(4 '8N,7   8N,76     %/'*%&&727$/6 23(N63$&(&$/&8/$7,2N6 5(4 ' RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ PRIVATE OPEN SPACERESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 2,987 SF COMMON SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE RESIDENTS’ COMMON OPEN SPACE TOTAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: 103,753 SF TOTAL PRIVATE RESIDENT OPEN SPACE: 10,600 SF • Building C1: 7,463 SF • Building B: 3,137 SF TOTAL COMMON RESIDENT OPEN SPACE: 54,797 SF • Building B: 14,791 SF • Building C1: 28,281 SF • Building C2: 11,725 SF C2 C2 C2 C2 C1 C1 C1 C1 B B B B C2 C2 C2 C2 C1 C1 C1 C1 B B B B 60 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING B 2019 A0108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 61 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C1 2019 A0208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 62 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C1 2019 A0308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 63 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 2019 A0408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 64 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 2019 A0508/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 65 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 PERSPECTIVES - BUILDING C2 2019 A0608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 66 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 2 : 5 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE RENDERINGS PER AREA PLAN 2019 A0708/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM DEL PASO DRIVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM DEL PASO DRIVE 67 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 4 2 : 1 9 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE RENDERINGS PER AREA PLAN 2019 A0808/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM OAK AVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM OAK AVE 68 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 4 2 : 1 9 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM SUNNYSIDE DRIVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM SUNNYSIDE DRIVE 69 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM FOREST VIEW DRIVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM FOREST VIEW DRIVE 70 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM FOREST VIEW DRIVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM FOREST VIEW DRIVE 71 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM HERMOSA LANE PROPOSED VIEW FROM HERMOSA LANE 72 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 4 2 : 2 0 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.508/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM DEL PASO DRIVE PROPOSED VIEW FROM DEL PASO DRIVE 73 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 1 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 NEIGHBORHOOD VIEWS 2019 A09.608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 EXISTING VIEW FROM CHICO COURT PROPOSED VIEW FROM CHICO COURT 74 MISSION RD MISSION RD 30 30 1 4 2.6 5 45.50 45.5048.00 48.80 46.50 43.00 8% 45.00 47.30 47.30 43.70 PARCEL 1 - BUILDING C2 PARCEL 2 - BUILDING C1 PARCEL 1 - BUILDING B 9 5 ' - 0 " E V A (E) CURB CUT TO REMAIN MISSION ROAD C O L M A C R E E K OAK AVE E L C A M I N O R E A L 48.30 46.30 48.30 46.30 SETBACK LINE R 30'-0" CORNER BUILDING PLANNING AREA 48.30 46.3 46.3 O A K A V E OP E N P A R K I N G OP E N P A R K I N G OPEN PARKING TOTAL LOT AREA (TLA): 149,295 SF TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT (TBD): 84,212 SF TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: TBD/TLA =56.41% TOTAL LOT AREA (TLA): 77,272 SF TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT (TBD): 46,231 SF TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: TBD/TLA =59.8% TOTAL LOT AREA (TLA): 64,408 SF TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT (TBD): 42,200 SF TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: TBD/TLA =65.5% SETBACK 36'-2" SETBACK 36'-2" 26 ' - 0 " 26'-0" KAISER PERMANENTE BART MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES GRAND STAIRS BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE GR A N D A V E DROP OFF DAYCARE DROP OFF DAYCARE MARKET HALL MARKET PLAZA PUBLIC PARK PA S E O CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT 1 0 '-0 " 10 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 8% LOBBY ENTRY GARAGE ENTRY LOBBY ENTRY R E S G A R A G E E N T R Y RETAIL GARAGE ENTRY L O B B Y E N T R Y MARKET HALL ENTRY N O R T H P A S E O SE T B A C K 13 ' - 6 " 15 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 0 " GA R A G E E N T R Y SETBACK RES LOBBY RES LOBBY RES LOBBY RES LOBBY 20' 40' 80' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE PLAN 2019 A1108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 TRUE PROJECT NORTH 75 BUILDING C2BUILDING C1BUILDING BOAK AVE PASEOCOLMA GREEK OBLIQUE NORTH PASEO BUILDING C2 BUILDING C1 BUILDING B OAK AVEPASEOCOLMA GREEK OBLIQUE NORTH PASEO BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 0 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SITE ELEVATIONS 2019 A1208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 40'-0"A12 1 SITE ELEVATION - MISSION ROAD 1" = 40'-0"A12 2 SITE ELEVATION - COLMA CREEK 76 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 3 2 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SHADOW STUDY 2019 A1308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 120'-0" EQUINOX @ 9AM 1" = 120'-0" EQUINOX @ NOON 1" = 120'-0" EQUINOX @ 3PM 1" = 120'-0" SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 9AM 1" = 120'-0" SUMMER SOLSTICE @ NOON 1" = 120'-0" SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 3PM 1" = 120'-0" WINTER SOLSTICE @ 9AM 1" = 120'-0" WINTER SOLSTICE @ NOON 1" = 120'-0" WINTER SOLSTICE @ 3PM 77 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 24'-0" 18'-4"18'-4" 24'-0" 18'-4" 18'-4" 25'-6" 2 4 '- 2 " 24'-0" 1 8 '- 4 " 1 8 '- 3 " 25'-0" 25'-0" RES. GARAGE STORAGE BIKE ROOM STORAGE FIRE PUMP ROOM BOILER ROOM MAIN ELECTRICAL BIKE ROOM 1 3 6 '-7 " 3 8 '- 1 1 " 187'-5" 141'-11" 182'-5" 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 3 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - B1 - BASEMENT 2019 A2008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 78 DN DN DN DN 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 PM OFFICE LEASING OFFICE MARKET HALL BOH MARKET HALL RETAIL GARAGE RES. GARAGE TR. DAYCARE OPEN SPACE LOBBY 26'-4" 24'-0" 18'-0"18'-0" 18'-0" 24'-0" 18'-4" 26'-4" 25'-6" 25'-6" 24'-0" 24'-0" 2 4 '-0 " 2 4 '-0 " 2 4 '- 0 " 2 4 '- 2 " 2 5 '- 0 " 1 8 '- 4 " 1 8 '- 3 " MPOE ELEC ROOM MEP MEP MEP PROJECTION ABOVE PROJECTION ABOVE 182'-6" 121'-6" 20'-5" 10'-6" 98'-11" 186'-5" 126'-5" 2 9 8 '-1 0 " 1 3 6 '-7 " 2 4 '-0 " 6 9 '-0 " 106'-3" 128'-4" LOADING DOCK 3 BR C6 1 9 '- 1 0 " 2 4 '- 0 " 1 6 '- 2 " 3 8 '- 1 1 " 24'-0" 71'-1" 24'-0" 20'-2" 9 '-1 "0 " 6 0 '-5 " 9 0 '-0 " 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 4 1 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 1 2019 A2108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 79 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 STUDIO S3 MARKET HALL MEZZANINE MEP STORAGE TRASH MEP 182'-6" 121'-6" 20'-5" 98'-6" 126'-5" 1 3 6 '-7 " 1 6 '- 2 " 3 8 '- 1 1 " 187'-6" 25'-11" RES. GARAGE 24'-0" 25'-6" 18'-4" 26'-4" 18'-4" 2 4 '- 2 " 2 5 '- 4 " 1 8 '- 0 " 1 8 '- 4 " STUDIO S3 6 9 '-2 " OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 2 9 8 '-1 0 " 6 0 '-6 " 9 '-1 " 1 5 0 '-1 " 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 4 2 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 2 2019 A2208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 80 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 AMENITY COURTYARD 3 BR C4.1 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A7 TRASH 3 8 '- 1 1 " 3 1 3 '-9 " 115'-1" 158'-0" 187'-4" 6 0 '-6 " 9 '-1 " 1 5 0 '-0 " 4 0 '-7 " 129'-4"13'-9" 35'-5" 9'-6" 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 STUDIO S2 2 BR B1 1 BR A1.1 3 BR C2 105'-0" STUDIO S3 STUDIO S3 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 0 : 0 8 : 4 8 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 3 2019 A2308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 81 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 3 BR C4.2 TRASH 3 8 '- 1 1 " 115'-1" 129'-4" 157'-11" 187'-4" 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 3 1 3 '-8 " 1 BR A4 6 0 '-1 1 " 8 '-8 " 1 5 0 '-6 " 3 9 '-9 " 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 13'-9" 35'-5" 9'-6" 1 BR A7 2 BR B9 STUDIO S2 2 BR B1 1 BR A1.1 3 BR C2 1 BR A1 1 BR A7 105'-2" 43'-7" 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 STUDIO S1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 0 : 0 8 : 4 9 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 4 (LEV 5-7 SIM) 2019 A2408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 82 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 3 BR C4.3 SKY LOUNGE OUTDOOR DECK TRASH 1 6 '- 2 " 3 8 '- 8 " 115'-1" 29'-3" 128'-8" 9'-6" 49'-2" 129'-4" 158'-1" 1 BR A4 3 1 3 '-8 " 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 6 0 '-1 1 " 1 5 9 '-1 " 3 9 '-9 " 1 BR A4 1 BR A7 2 BR B9 STUDIO S2 3 BR C2 1 BR A1 1 BR A7 1 BR A1.1 105'-2" 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 STUDIO S1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 0 : 0 8 : 5 0 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 8 2019 A2808/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 83 2 A31 1 A31 A 3 01 A30 3 A30 2 A30 4 MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE 4 A101 TYP 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 4 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING B 2019 A2908/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 84 B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" PHASE II OAK AVE B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" PHASE II OAK AVE OBLIQUE B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" M - METAL SIDING B - BRICK VENEER T - CERAMIC TILE C - CONCRETE P - CEMENT PLASTER W - WINDOWS G - GUARDRAIL MATERIALS LEGEND 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 5 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING B 2019 A3008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A30 3 ELEVATION B - EAST 1" = 20'-0"A30 2 ELEVATION B - SOUTH 1" = 20'-0"A30 4 ELEVATION B - WEST 1" = 20'-0"A30 1 ELEVATION B - NORTH M2 M1 M3 G2P2M2M4P2M1 M3 P2M1W1M4 G1M4M1P2W1M2M1M3 C1 W3 M3 RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND BUILDING ADDRESS DIRECTIONAL SIGN ZONE MARKET HALL IDENTITY SIGNAGE AND BRANDING ZONE SIGNAGE FOR BUILDING MOVING/LOADING ENTRANCE POTENTIAL COMMUNITY MURAL GRAPHIC/ART ZONE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SIGN PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SIGN (SIGN INDICATING PUBLIC PARKING FOR MARKET HALL) W1W2 W1 G2 SEE A32 FOR DETAILED MATERIAL BOARD W1 W2G1 M1 W2 M1 W1 C1 G1W2 T1 MOVING/LOADING DOCK SIGN W2 P3 P1 G1 M4M1W1G2 85 B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" B LEVEL B1 -11'-8 3/8" 22 ' - 4 " 23 ' - 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 4 " 15 ' - 0 " AMENITY MARKET HALL MARKET HALL MEZZANINE MARKET HALL BOH RES. GARAGE RETAIL GARAGE RES. GARAGE PODIUM COURTYARD B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 A4 A4 A4 A4 A4 A4 EXISTING LOW GRADE +46.2' A4 MECHANICAL ENCLOSUREELEVATOR PENTHOUSE A4 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 B LEVEL 1 3'-3 5/8" B LEVEL 2 15'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 3 26'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 4 36'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 5 46'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 6 56'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 7 66'-7 5/8" B LEVEL 8 76'-7 5/8" B ROOF 86'-7 5/8" B LEVEL B1 -11'-8 3/8" C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 RES. GARAGE RETAIL GARAGE RES. GARAGE 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 84 ' - 1 1 " BU I L D I N G H E I G H T P E R P L A N N I N G C O D E EXISTING HIGH GRADE +48.3' EXISTING AVG GRADE +47.25' OAK AVE. AVG ROOF HEIGHT MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE PODIUM COURTYARD B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 : 2 5 : 1 0 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING B 2019 A3108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A31 2 BUILDING B - SECTION 02 1" = 20'-0"A31 1 BUILDING B - SECTION 01 86 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 5 4 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING B MATERIAL BOARD 2019 A3208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 87 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5128% 15 % 25 ' - 0 " 23'-0" 25'-9 1/2" 25 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 23'-0" 25'-9 1/2" 24 ' - 0 " 24'-0" STOR BIKE ROOM BIKE ROOM STOR BIKE ROOM LOBBY LOBBY BOILER OR BOOSTER PUMP MPOE MAIN ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM STORAGE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM STORAGE 119'-2"144'-7" 317'-4"86'-1" 192 ' - 7 1 / 2" 10 ' - 0 " 36 ' - 0 " 280'-8" 16 8 ' - 0 " 267'-4" 65 ' - 5 " 17 6 ' - 9 " 39 ' - 3 " 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 3 : 5 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - B1 - BASEMENT 2019 A4008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 88 DN DN DN DN DN DN 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A512LIVE WORK LW 1 LOBBY MAIL ELEV LOBBY MOVING ELEV LOBBY OFFICE LEASING OFFICE PM OFFICE DAYCARE TRASH BOILER OR BOOSTER PUMP FIRE PUMP ROOM MPOE TRASH TRASH DAYCARE OPEN SPACE 8% 15 % 18 ' - 4 " 25 ' - 1 0 " 24 ' - 0 " FUTURE GATES FOR STACKERS EF F E C T I V E A I S L E WI D T H W I T H G A T E OP E N O N O N E S I D E SURFACE PARKING - CAPABLE OF FUTURE STACKERS 18'-4" 25'-0"26'-5 1/2" 18'-3" 23'-0"23'-0" 25 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 0 " 25'-5" 8% 24 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 24'-7 " 13 4 ' - 7 " 9' - 0 " 3 8 ' - 4 " 50 ' - 5 " 8' - 8 " 16 8 ' - 3 " 193'-1"86'-6" 235'-4" 3 BR C6 2 4 '- 0 " 63'-7"147'-8"25'-5"79'-2"156'-2" 1 6 '- 2 " 3 8 '- 1 1 " LOBBY LIVE WORK LW 2 LIVE WORK LW 3 LIVE WORK LW 3 LIVE WORK LW 4 LIVE WORK LW 5 LIVE WORK LW 6 LIVE WORK LW 6 LIVE WORK LW 6 LIVE WORK LW 6 1 2 0'-6" 3 0'-5" 1 6 7'-7" LIVE WORK LW 3 LIVE WORK LW 3 LIVE WORK LW 3.1 481'-8" 19 ' - 1 1 " 24 7 ' - 5 " 13 ' - 6 " 3 4 8'-6" GAS METER 2 BR B1.2 2 BR B1.2 2 BR B1.2 2 BR B1.2 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 0 1 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 1 2019 A4108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 89 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 FITNESS 1 BR A4.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 STUDIO S1 1 BR A1 STUDIO S1 3 BR C1 3 BR C1 3 BR C3.21 1 BR A7.1 2 BR B9.2 2 BR B1.1 2 BR B6 1 BR A6 1 BR A5.1 3 BR C4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B9 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 STUDIO S1 1 BR A3.1 TRASH STOR RES METER ROOMMEPMEP TRASH TENANT STORAGE ID F STUDIO S1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1.1 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 1 BR A3.4 13 9 ' - 7 " 9' - 0 " 3 8 ' - 4 " 59 ' - 1 " 189'-9"36'-2" 1 BR A4.4 OPEN TO BELOW 1 BR A1 1 BR A1.3 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 STUDIO S1.1 1 BR A4.3 1 BR A4.3 488'-1" 1 6 5'-3" 1 5 8'-1 1" 3 2 4'-2" 2 BR B8.2 225'-11"34'-8" 25 5 ' - 1 1 " 72'-3"254'-9"70'-2"86'-4" 2 BR B2.2 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 0 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 2 2019 A4208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 90 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 1 BR A1 1 BR A4.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 3 BR C1 3 BR C1 3 BR C3.21 1 BR A7.1 2 BR B9.2 2 BR B1.1 2 BR B6 1 BR A6 1 BR A5.1 3 BR C4.1 1 BR A2 3 BR C3 1 BR A42 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A3 TRASH MEP RES METER ROOMMEPMEP TRASH TENANT STORAGE IDF 1 BR A3.1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B2 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.1 36'-2"189'-9" 67 ' - 1 0 " 71 ' - 9 " 9' - 1 " 3 7 ' - 7 " 59 ' - 1 0 " 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B8.2 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 2 BR B4.1 1 BR A1.1 2 BR B9 1 2 4'-7" 1 9 9'-7" 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.3 STUDIO S1.1 72'-3"254'-9"61'-8"94'-10" 483'-7" 491'-6" 225'-11"34'-8" 25 5 ' - 1 1 " 3 2 4'-2" 2 BR B2.2 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 0 5 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 3 2019 A4308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 91 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 1 BR A1 STUDIO S1.2 1 BR A4.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B5 2 BR B3 1 BR A7 1 BR A3.1 2 BR B9.3 2 BR B6.1 1 BR A6 1 BR A5 3 BR C4.2 1 BR A2 2 BR B7 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A3 1 BR A3 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 TRASH MEP TRASH TENANT STORAGE IDF MEP 2 BR B4 2 BR B4 2 BR B9.1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B5 2 BR B5 13 2 ' - 1 " 9' - 0 " 3 7 ' - 7 " 59 ' - 1 0 " 23 8 ' - 5 " 218'-5"37'-2" 2 BR B2 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1.2 1 BR A1.2 1 BR A1 2 BR B9 1 1 9'-2" 1 9 9'-7" 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4 3 BR C3.22 487'-0" 248'-2"69'-5"71'-1"54'-9"43'-7" 3 1 8'-9" 2 BR B2.1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 0 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 4 (5 SIM) 2019 A4408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 92 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 STUDIO S1.2 1 BR A4.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 3 BR C1 2 BR B3 1 BR A7 1 BR A3.1 2 BR B9.3 2 BR B6.1 1 BR A6 1 BR A5 3 BR C4.2 SKY LOUNGE 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A3 1 BR A3 TRASH TRASH TENANT STORAGE IDF 1 BR A1.2 2 BR B9.1 2 BR B4 2 BR B4 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B5 2 BR B7.1 2 BR B7.1 2 BR B7 STUDIO S1 ROOF DECK 20 9 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 218'-5"37'-2" 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.11 BR A1.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4.1 1 BR A4 2 BR B2.1 484'-0" 24 4 ' - 9 " 68 ' - 1 " 9' - 0 " 13 2 ' - 1 " 66'-0"86'-5"21'-6"140'-9"71'-1"54'-9"43'-7" 331'-7" 3 2'-1" 8 7'-1" 1 9 9'-7" 3 1 8'-9" 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 0 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 6 2019 A4608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 93 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 1 BR A4.2 3 BR C3.23 2 BR B9.3 2 BR B6.1 1 BR A6 3 BR C4.3 SKY LOUNGE 2 BR B8 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A3 STUDIO S1.2 1 BR A3 3 BR C2 TRASH TRASH 1 BR A1.2 2 BR B4 2 BR B4 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B7 13 2 ' - 1 " 9' - 0 " 68 ' - 1 " 20 9 ' - 2 " 1 BR A4 OPEN TO BELOW ROOF 1 BR A1.2 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 23 9 ' - 9 " 459'-11" 66'-0"86'-5"66'-0"167'-3"55'-6"18'-8" 2 9 4'-6" 218'-5"37'-2"204'-4" 2 BR B2.1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 1 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 7 2019 A4708/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 94 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A5122 BR B5.1 ROOF DECK 3 BR C3.23 3 BR C2 2 BR B9.3 2 BR B6.1 1 BR A6 2 BR B8 3 BR C4.3 3 BR C5 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 1 BR A4 2 BR B1 2 BR B1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A3 1 BR A3 TRASH TRASH 1 BR A1 2 BR B4 2 BR B4 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 STUDIO S1 2 BR B7 13 2 ' - 1 " 9' - 0 " 68 ' - 1 " 20 9 ' - 2 " 66'-0"86'-5"66'-0"167'-3"74'-2" ROOF BELOW ROOF 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 1 BR A1 459'-11" 23 9 ' - 9 " 66'-0"86'-5"66'-0"37'-2"204'-4" 2 8 8'-1 1" 2 BR B2.1 2 BR B2 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 1 2 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C1 - LEVEL 8 2019 A4808/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 95 2 A52 3 A52 1 A52 A51 1 A50 1 A50 2A512MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE 4 A101 TYP 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 1 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C1 2019 A4908/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 96 C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" M - METAL SIDING B - BRICK VENEER T - CERAMIC TILE C - CONCRETE P - CEMENT PLASTER W - WINDOWS G - GUARDRAIL MATERIALS LEGEND C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 : 2 5 : 4 7 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C1 2019 A5008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A50 1 ELEVATION C1 - NORTH P4P1P6P4 M5 P1P6M5M7 SIGNAGE FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGNAGE FOR BUILDING MOVING/LOADING ENTRANCE SEE A53 FOR DETAILED MATERIAL BOARD W2 G2G1 C1 SIGNAGE LEASING OFFICE W2G2P6 1" = 20'-0"A50 2 ELEVATION C1 - WEST M7 W2W2P1P6G2 W1 P1 M5 W2G1M5 M5 B1 P4 G1P4 W2 P6P1W2 P6 M5 G1 W1 P4W1 W1 B1 G1 M7 97 C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" M - METAL SIDING B - BRICK VENEER T - CERAMIC TILE C - CONCRETE P - CEMENT PLASTER W - WINDOWS G - GUARDRAIL MATERIALS LEGEND C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 1 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C1 2019 A5108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A51 2 ELEVATION C1 - SOUTH P1 P4W1W2 W3 P1 G2 P6 P4 P1 P6M5M5 P4 B1T1M5 M7G1 W3G2 M5 PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SIGN RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND BUILDING ADDRESS DIRECTIONAL SIGN ZONE DAYCARE IDENTITY SIGN ZONE POTENTIAL DAYCARE IDENTITY SIGN ZONE OR GRAPHICS/ COMMUNITY ART RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND BUILDING ADDRESS DIRECTIONAL SIGN ZONE W2 G2 T1 SEE A53 FOR DETAILED MATERIAL BOARD W2 1" = 20'-0"A51 1 ELEVATION C1 - EAST P6 W2 P1 P6W2W1W1 M7W1 W1P4 C1 M5 P6 P1 P6M5G1G2 P4B1W1G1P4M7M7W1G1M5 G1 M5 W1G2 W1M7G1 M5 W3 P6P6G2 98 C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" C1 LEVEL B1 GARAGE GARAGE B1 B1 B1 B1 B5 B5 C1 C1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 S1.2 S1.2 S1.2 S1.2 B4.1 B4.1 EXISTING LOW GRADE +43.7' EXISTING HIGH GRADE +48.0' MISSION ROAD EXISTING AVG GRADE +45.8' 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 11 ' - 0 " 1 2 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " PODIUM COURTYARD B1 LW 4 C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" C1 LEVEL B1 B7.1 B5 B5B1 B1 B5 B1 B1B1 B1 GARAGE GARAGE B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 MISSION ROAD PODIUM COURTYARD RES. GARAGE ENTRY LW 5 B5.1 B5.1 B5.1 B5.1 B5.1 B5.1 B5.1 B2 B2 B2 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 SKY LOUNGE SKY LOUNGE FITNESS GARAGE GARAGE OFFICE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM EXISTING LOW GRADE +43.3' PASEO ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE PODIUM COURTYARDPODIUM COURTYARD RAMP C1 LEVEL 1 0" C1 LEVEL 2 12'-4" C1 LEVEL 3 23'-4" C1 LEVEL 4 33'-7" C1 LEVEL 5 43'-10" C1 LEVEL 6 54'-1" C1 LEVEL 7 64'-4" C1 LEVEL 8 74'-7" C1 ROOF 84'-10" C1 LEVEL B1 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 10 ' - 3 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " BU I L D I N G H E I G H T P E R P L A N N I N G C O D E 84 ' - 7 " A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A4 A4 A4 STOR EXISTING HIGH GRADE +48.0' EXISTING AVG GRADE +45.8' AVG ROOF HEIGHT MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE LW 6 A4.3 A4 A4.3 A4 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 : 4 5 : 0 2 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING C1 2019 A5208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A52 2 BUILDING C1 -SECTION 02 1" = 20'-0"A52 3 BUILDING C1 -SECTION 03 1" = 20'-0"A52 1 BUILDING C1 -SECTION 01 99 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 1 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING C1 MATERIAL BOARD 2019 A5308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 100 DN DN DN 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 MAIL LOBBY TRASH MAIN ELECTRICAL BOILER ROOM FIRE PUMP ROOM GARAGE BIKE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM MPOE GAS METER ALCOVE MAINT 3 BR AF C2 9'-0" BIKE SLOPE25 ' - 6 " 28 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 25 ' - 1 1 " 25 ' - 6 " 25'-0" 24'-0"24'-0" 25'-0" 18'-4"18'-4" 23 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 3 " 19 ' - 4 " 18'-4"18'-4" OFFICES 30'-6"140'-6" 176'-5" 43 ' - 2 " 11 7 ' - 0 " 63 ' - 1 " 7' - 0 " 23 7 ' - 0 " 1' - 3 " 193'-4" 36'-11" 8'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-5" 47 ' - 8 " 17 2 ' - 1 " 12 ' - 4 " 15 5 ' - 0 " 128'-1" 23 7 ' - 0 " 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B1 3 BR AF C1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 5 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 1 2019 A6108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 101 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 RESIDENT COMMUNITY SPACE LAUNDRY 1 7 '-0 " 1 3 '-2 " 21'-10" 8'-8"140'-6" 176'-5" 43 ' - 2 " 11 7 ' - 0 " 63 ' - 1 " 7' - 0 " 23 7 ' - 0 " 1' - 3 " 36'-11" 8'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-5" 203'-0" 43 ' - 1 1 " 45 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 13 3 ' - 8 " 3 BR AF C2 3 BR AF C1.1 3 BR AF C1.1 2 BR AF B3 STUDIO AF S1.1 23 7 ' - 0 " 1 BR AF A1 STUDIO AF S1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 STUDIO AF S1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 2 2019 A6208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 102 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 STORAGE LAUNDRY 21'-10" 8'-8"140'-6" 176'-5" 43 ' - 2 " 11 7 ' - 0 " 63 ' - 1 " 7' - 0 " 23 7 ' - 0 " 1' - 3 " 36'-11" 8'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-7" 10'-5" 13'-5" 203'-0" 1 3 '-2 " 3 BR AF C2 3 BR AF C1.1 3 BR AF C1.1 2 BR AF B3 STUDIO AF S1.1 23 7 ' - 0 " 43 ' - 1 1 " 45 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 13 3 ' - 8 " 1 BR AF A1 STUDIO AF S1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 STUDIO AF S1 STUDIO AF S1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 3 2019 A6308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 103 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 STORAGE LAUNDRY ROOF 21'-10" 8'-8"140'-6" 176'-5" 43 ' - 2 " 12 ' - 7 " 10 1 ' - 6 " 26 ' - 9 " 28 ' - 3 " 6 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 6 " 23 2 ' - 0 " 1' - 3 " 166'-8" 1 3 '-2 " 3 BR AF C1.1 1 BR AF A1 STUDIO AF S1 STUDIO AF S1.1 43 ' - 1 1 " 45 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 13 3 ' - 8 " 1 BR AF A1 STUDIO AF S1 23 7 ' - 0 " 43 ' - 1 1 " 45 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 13 3 ' - 8 " 157'-8" ROOF DECK 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B1 STUDIO AF S1 STUDIO AF S1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 4 (5 SIM) 2019 A6408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 104 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 LAUNDRY 21'-10" 8'-8"140'-6" 176'-5" 69 ' - 6 " 1' - 3 " 45 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 13 3 ' - 8 " 43 ' - 1 1 " 11 ' - 1 0 " 20 5 ' - 3 " 3 BR AF C1.1 1 BR AF A1 2 BR AF B4 2 BR AF B3 ROOF 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 3 BR AF C1 1 BR AF A1 1 BR AF A1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B1 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 2 BR AF B2 STUDIO AF S1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 2 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING C2 - LEVEL 6 (7 SIM) 2019 A6608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 105 2 A71 1 A71 A70 2 A70 1 A70 3 A70 4 MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE 4 A101 TYP 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS N8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C2 2019 A6808/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 106 C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" M - METAL SIDING B - BRICK VENEER T - CERAMIC TILE C - CONCRETE P - CEMENT PLASTER W - WINDOWS G - GUARDRAIL MATERIALS LEGEND 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 : 2 7 : 1 9 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C2 2019 A7008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A70 2 ELEVATION C2 - EAST 1" = 20'-0"A70 3 ELEVATION C2 - SOUTH 1" = 20'-0"A70 4 ELEVATION C2 - WEST 1" = 20'-0"A70 1 ELEVATION C2 - NORTH P5P1 M9 P6 B2 C1 G1 P5P6W2 P9 P5P1 P6 M9P6 W3 B2 P7 W2 P6M9 P9 RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND BUILDING ADDRESS DIRECTIONAL SIGN ZONE PARKING ENTRANCE SIGN SEE A72 FOR DETAILED MATERIAL BOARD P1 B2P7 W1 W2 W1 P8W2 P9 W2 W1 P9C1 W2P6 G2 W1 107 C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" GARAGE EXIST. LOW GRADE + 45.5' MISSION ROAD EXIST. HIGH GRADE + 48.5' EXIST. AVG GRADE + 47.0' AVG ROOF HEIGHT BUILDING HEIGHT PER PLANNING CODE 80 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 4 " PODIUM COURTYARD AF A1 AF A1 AF A1 AF A1 AF A1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B1 AF B2 AF B2 AF B2 AF B2 AF B2 AF B2 AF B2 C2 LEVEL 1 6" C2 LEVEL 2 14'-10" C2 LEVEL 3 26'-10" C2 LEVEL 4 37'-10" C2 LEVEL 5 48'-10" C2 LEVEL 6 59'-10" C2 LEVEL 7 70'-10" C2 ROOF 81'-10" FIRE PUMP ROOM GARAGE MAIN ELECTRICAL AF S1RESIDENT COMMUNITY SPACE AF B3 AF B3 AF S1 AF S1 AF S1 MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 4 " PODIUM COURTYARD AF C1 AF C1 AF C1 AF C1 AF C1AF B1 AF B1 AF C1 AF C1 10' 20' 40' 0 10' 20' 40' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 9 8 : 2 7 : 4 7 A M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING C2 2019 A7108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 20'-0"A71 2 BUILDING C2 - SECTION 01 1" = 20'-0"A71 1 BUILDING C2 - SECTION 02 108 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 BUILDING C2 MATERIAL BOARD 2019 A7208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 109 Q Q 27'-6" 15'-0" AF S1 405 SF DW 24'-0" 27'-6" AF A1 655 SF DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 6 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - S1, A1 2019 A8108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 110 Q T T Q T T 34'-0" 27'-6" AF B1 895 SF DW AF B2 935 SF 26'-4" 36'-0" DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - B1, B2 2019 A8208/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 111 Q Q T T AF C1 1,220 SF 46'-0" 27'-6" DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 8 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 AFFORDABLE UNIT PLANS - C1 2019 A8308/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 112 W/D K Q W/D Q W/D 24'-0" 30'-0" A1 715 SF DW S1 445 SF 15'-0" 30'-0" DW 20'-0" 33'-0" A2 655 SF DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 UNIT PLANS - S1, A1, A2 2019 A8408/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 113 W/ D Q Q Q W/ D W/D A4 760 SF 30'-0" 25'-6" DW DW A7A & A7B 560 SF & 600 SF A7A A7B DW DW 40'-0" 40'-0" 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 3 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 UNIT PLANS - A4, A7A & A7B 2019 A8508/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 114 K Q W/ D W/D KK B2 990 SF 25'-0" 40'-0" DW B1 1,045 SF 35'-0" 30'-0" DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 UNIT PLANS - B1, B2 2019 A8608/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 115 K T T Q W/D C1 1,370 SF 48'-4" 30'-0" DW 2' 4' 8' 0BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 1 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 UNIT PLANS - C1 2019 A8708/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 116 WDW RO WDW RO WDW RO FDA-99-001 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW FAF CASING BEAD WINDOW SHIMS SLOPED SILL FRAMING NAIL-FIN WINDOW 24 GA MIN GSM L- SHAPED BACK-DAM, SEALANT BETWEEN BACK-DAM AND WINDOW SILL PTD MDF SILL & APRON CAULKING BACKER ROD AND SEALANT BACKER ROD AND SEALANT AWRB FDA-99-002 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW NAIL-FIN WINDOW RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT CASING BEAD SEALANT AND BACKER ROD BTWN WDW FRAME AND FAF BACKER ROD AND SEALANT FDA-99-003 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW NAIL-FIN WINDOW RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT SEALANT GSM DRIP EDGE W/ END DAMS NO SEALANT BETWEEN WEEP SCREED AND DRIP EDGE WEEP SCREED EXTEND JAMB CASING BEAD UNDER HEAD FLASHING, TYP. BACKER ROD AND SEALANT BTWN WDW FRAME AND FAF FDA-99-017 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW FAF WINDOW SHIMS SLOPED SILL FRAMING NAIL-FIN WINDOW 24 GA MIN GSM L- SHAPED BACK DAM PTD MDF SILL & APRON CAULKING PRECAST CONCRETE WINDOW SILL FILLET BEAD OF SEALANT PRECAST CLIP 2X4 FRAMINGCONTINUE DRAINAGE MAT BEHIND PRECAST SILL BACKER ROD AND SEALANT CASING BEAD FDA-99-019 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW THIN BRICK CORNER BACKER ROD AND SEALANT 2X4 FRAMING NAIL-FIN WINDOW RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT 4 1/2" FDA-99-018 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW PTD GSM HEAD FLASHING UTILITY 11 5/8" THIN BRICK CUT DOWN TO REQUIRED SIZE AT SOLDIER COURSE RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT 4X BLOCKING BACKER ROD AND SEALANT BTWN WDW FRAME AND FAF FDA-99-020 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW FILLET BEAD OF SEALANT NAIL-FIN WINDOW COMPOSITE METAL PANEL SLOPED SILL FRAMING 24 GA MIN GSM L- SHAPED BACK DAM PTD MDF SILL & APRON BACKER ROD AND SEALANT 2X4 FRAMING WINDOW SHIMS FDA-99-022 NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW FILLET BEAD OF SEALANT 2X4 FRAMING NAIL-FIN WINDOW RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT 4 1/2" COMPOSITE METAL PANEL NAIL FIN ALUM. WINDOW 4X BLOCKING PTD GSM HEAD TRIM RETURN GWB TO WINDOW FRAME BACKER ROD AND SEALANT NO SEALANT AT HEAD JOINT COMPOSITE METAL PANEL NAIL FIN WINDOW FAA-bv-004 NAIL FIN VINYL WINDOW NAIL FIN WINDOW W/O STUCCO KEY SLOPED BLOCKING FAF SEALANT & BACKER ROD J CAULKING BEAD, BENT & CUT TO FIT OVER SLOPED BLOCKING AWRB FAA-bv-005 NAIL FIN VINYL WINDOW WD STUD FRAMING, SSD J CAULKING BEAD SEALANT & BACKER ROD CORNER BEAD, WIRE TIE TO MTL LATH NAIL FIN WINDOW W/O STUCCO KEY 2X4 WD STUD AWRB FAA-bv-006 NAIL FIN VINYL WINDOW WD STUD FRAMING, SSD SEALANT & BACKER ROD SOFFIT SCREED W/ DRIP EDGE 2X4 WD STUD FAF NAIL FIN WINDOW W/O STUCCO KEY AWRB BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 2 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR DETAILS 2019 A10008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 2 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR DETAILS 2019 A10008/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 3" = 1'-0"A100 1 WINDOW SILL AT CEMENT PLASTER 3" = 1'-0"A100 2 WINDOW JAMB AT CEMENT PLASTER 3" = 1'-0"A100 3 WINDOW HEAD AT CEMENT PLASTER 3" = 1'-0"A100 4 WINDOW SILL AT BRICK VENEER 3" = 1'-0"A100 5 WINDOW JAMB AT BRICK VENEER 3" = 1'-0"A100 6 WINDOW HEAD AT BRICK VENEER 3" = 1'-0"A100 7 COMPOSITE METAL PANEL WINDOW SILL 3" = 1'-0"A100 8 COMPOSITE METAL PANEL WINDOW JAMB 3" = 1'-0"A100 9 COMPOSITE METAL PANEL WINDOW HEAD 3" = 1'-0"A100 10 RECESSED SILL AT CEMENT PLASTER 3" = 1'-0"A100 11 RECESSED JAMB AT CEMENT PLASTER 3" = 1'-0"A100 12 RECESSED HEAD AT CEMENT PLASTER 117 WDW BO STL WDW STOREFRONT S L O P E QUANTITY & TYPE OF FASTENER DETERMINED BY STRUCTURAL CALCS PROVIDED BY ROOFSCREEN MFG 7.2 RIB PANEL ATTACH PANEL USING TEK SCREWS HAT CHANNEL, TYP. ATTACH HAT CHANNEL USING TEK SCREWS T.O. ROOF SCREEN TRIM CAP 2 1/2" DIA. TUBING BASE CONNECTOR, TYP ROTOLOCK CONNECTION ATTACH USING THREAD CUTTING SCREWS BASE CAP, TYP BASE SUPPORT, TYP SINGLE PLYWOOD ROOFING ATTACH BASE CONNECTOR USING TEK SCREWS ATTACH BASE CAP TO BASE SUPPORT USING BOLTS W/ SEALING WASHERS T.O. ROOF SHEATING VA R I E S ( F R O M 3 ' 6 " T O 5 ' 6 " ) SEE PLANS VARIES (1' 0" TO 3' 0") 2' T O B . O . S C R E E N P A N E L 2' - 2 " STRUCT SHEATING 3" RIGID INSULATION BACKER ROD AND SEAL BOTH SIDES SHIM ALUM STOREFRONT CONCRETE BEAM AWRB WEEP HEAD FLASHING FED-HR-007 AT STEEL BEAM HEADER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT PER SCHEDULE ALUM BREAK MTL CLOSURE SEALANT FAF OVER GSM HEAD FLASHING GSM HEAD FLASHING SEALANT & BACKER ROD GSM SILL FLASHING SEALANT INSLUATION STOREFRONT WDW OR LOUVER 1/2" CANOPY, WHERE OCCURS FED-99-001 AT CONCRETE CURB WALL BEYOND CONCRETE CURB BEYOND SIDEWALK ALUM STOREFRONT BACKER ROD AND SEAL, BOTH SIDES SHIM ACRYLIC LATEX MODIFIED CEMENT WP ON CURB, TYP ALL FASTNERS TO BE SET AND FULLY CAPPED WITH SEALANT BARarchitects c BARCOPYRIGHT ARCHITECTS 8/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 9 9 : 1 4 : 4 3 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p s a n o o r \ D o c u m e n t s \ S S F M a s t e r p l a n _ P S a n o o r . r v t SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17057 SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR DETAILS 2019 A10108/13/19 1051 MISSION ROAD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1" = 1'-0"A101 4 MECH. SCREEN AT ROOF 3" = 1'-0"A101 3 STOREFRONT HEAD AT METAL PANEL 3" = 1'-0"A101 2 CANOPY AT STOREFRONT 3" = 1'-0"A101 1 STOREFRONT SILL 118 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD COMMENT LETTER Date: July 31, 2019 Applicant: SSF Housing Partners LLC Att: Brian Baker 500 Sansome Street, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94111 Site Address: 1051 Mission Road - PUC site Project No.: P18-0081: UP19-0008 & DR19-0028 On Tuesday, July 16, 2019, the Design Review Board reviewed your plans for a proposal to redevelop 5.9 acres of vacant land to construct 800 residential units, a 8,300 SF childcare facility, 13,000 SF commercial retail space, approximately 1 acre of public open space, and related infrastructure at 1051 Mission Road and surrounding parcels. The Planning Manager has determined that this application is in compliance and pursuant to Title 20, Section 20.480 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and Design Guidelines after the following changes have been made to the plans: Overall Architecture 1. Conduct a massing study to incorporate the adjacent buildings and show how the proposed development fits into the greater neighborhood context, including the Kaiser Building and the new residential development at 988 El Camino Real, SM County future medical center and potential development (Pacific Market) along the El Camino Real corridor under current zoning regulations. 2.The massing study should include dimensions of all the structures or include a key. 3. Views of the massing study should be provided from multiple angles and directions and consider views at 3000’ to show view from distance. 4.Articulation – design effort was successful along Mission Road but buildings will be seen from many directions and need to ensure that the rest of the building is well articulated 5. Buildings are too uniformly flat - horizontal roof line along the buildings is a little overwhelming and needs more differentiation. Show details that emphasize existing or proposed articulation on the elevations. CITY COUNCIL 2019 KARYL MATSUMOTO, MAYOR RICHARD A. GARBARINO, VICE MAYOR MARK ADDIEGO, COUNCILMEMBER MARK NAGALES, COUNCILMEMBER BUENAFLOR NICOLAS, COUNCILMEMBER MIKE FUTRELL, CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (650) 829-6620 FAX (650) 829-6657 E-MAIL [email protected] Attachment 2 119 6. Appreciate the way you stepped back mass, elevation is well rendered but doesn’t show step back all that well so consider different angles. More renderings and perhaps an animation or a fly through might be helpful. 7. Design Guidelines require a strong base, middle and top, and should be well articulated by vertical planes. Refer to design guidelines in the ECR/C Area Plan. 8. The proposed materials make the buildings look somewhat industrial - consider opportunity to soften the exterior materials. Consider a two-dimensional mock-up of an elevation to show materials and finishes. 9. The revised plans should include a foundation plan. Building B Specific Comments: 10. Show in plans how building B would be accessed and interact with the site if Phase 2 of the Oak Avenue extension is built along the Market Hall building. 11. Building B is a successful design but consider some roof height variation. Building C1 Specific Comments: 12. Many ideas incorporated into the C1 elevation but doesn’t have a cohesive design - cohesion could help and it might be ok to look like one building and not many within its single facade 13. Focus on C1 roof height variation Landscaping and Site Planning 14. Include a street light design and detail sheet for each fixture on private property or public right-of- way. 15. Be sure to balance bio-retention and verify locations since it can’t be used by people once built and designed 16. Most of the proposed landscaping will work for site, except for certain locations of the campus – For Dave and Chris specific comments. • Change Platanus acerifolia to Platanus acerifolia 'Columbia', which is mildew resistant. • Sequoia sempervirens will not thrive in the wind in SSF. Placement should be carefully considered at wind protected faces of buildings. Coordinate with wind study. • Fremontodendron californicum, California Flannelbush, shown in the presentation is likely to fail due to fast root growth in the pot at the nursery, resulting in encircling roots and destabilized plants. Suggest alternate species such as Toyon. 17. Applicant should conduct a wind study to determine what species will survive at this campus. 18. Applicant needs to select tree species that will scale the height of the buildings and incorporate some landscaping in between the trees to create a pattern that will help soften the area. The plant list is mostly small patio size trees 25'-35' tall. The buildings are uniformly 84' tall. The design does not utilize a very good buffering tool of design with tall trees which reach heights up to 100' such as Lombardy Poplar, Western Cottonwood, several Eucalyptus species, Canary Island Pine, Valley Oak, Red Oak, and careful placement of Redwood. The best groups of tall trees in the design are where the future extension of Oak Ave. will necessitate their removal. 19. Applicant should consider age appropriate design of the children's play area. Design for all ages does not work and Toddlers ages 2-5 should be in a signed and fenced area, while ages 6-12 120 should be separate. The play area should be signed no teens or adults over age 12 allowed, and only adults with children allowed. This area needs to be a safe zone and have proper visibility into the area and provide caretaker seating. 20. Demonstrate how the private and public space will work for the site and include a plan sheet indicating total open space (public and private). 21. Provide landscape material examples to go along with the building material examples 22. Comments on the Mission Road street experience of the project: • Consider adding additional mid-block crossings through Mission Road; • Traffic calming on Mission Road recommended. 23. Vision for Colma Creek is unclear in plan submittal – provide clear plan sheets of existing and proposed improvements. Show any improvements proposed for fencing along the Colma Creek to help screen the area. 24. The Board would like more information or a walk through explanation of how the parking stackers will work for the site. 25. Show how the site will comply with a pickup & drop off plan for childcare, for residents utilizing Lyft, Uber, delivery services, and guests visiting the site. 26. Indicate where the trash enclosures are located on the campus and a plan from South San Scavenger for a pickup and drop off area. Show any drop chute for the residents to discard their trash or recycle. 27. As a potential safety measure, site planning should incorporate more crosswalks with traffic lights (as possible) on Mission Road. Public Comments There were two speakers from the public: 28. Katie Stokes – resides in the Sunshine Gardens neighborhood. Concern with one of the buildings standing out and being very visible from her neighborhood. Would like the applicant to change the color of the building from white to another color. The white color may provide glare. 29. Francine Andrade – Concern with overflow traffic when there are events at the campus. Where will everyone park at the site? Attached is a copy of the Building and Water Quality Control Plan conditions for you to include into your resubmittal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact the Planning Division at (650) 877-8535. Sincerely, __________________________ __________________________ Tony Rozzi Sailesh Mehra Principal Planner Planning Manager Attachments: Building & Water Quality Control Plant comments 121 95 Brady Street San Francisco, CA 94103 415 541 9001 [email protected] www.sfhac.org/bayhac The Bay Area Housing Action Coalition advocates for the creation of well-designed, well-located housing, at ALL levels of affordability, to meet the needs of Bay Area residents, present and future. To Whom It May Concern: The Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition (BayHAC) is proud to announce its endorsement of AGI-KASA Partners’ proposed project at South San Francisco’s PUC site. After an extensive presentation from the project team, our Project Review Committee determined the proposal would help address crises caused by our housing shortage through creation of well-designed new homes, located near transit. The Committee would also like to highlight the various difficulties associated with maximizing the potential of the site to serve the community with housing. Across the Bay Area, long-time residents and newcomers alike face an acute housing shortage, which has driven up prices and dragged down affordability. AGI-KASA Partners’ proposed 800 new homes would transform the currently empty PUC site into desperately needed homes for people. In addition, the team’s proposal for 20% subsidized affordable homes in a stand-alone building would bring even deeper levels of affordability to the community. While the 800 homes are significant, BayHAC would like to see this site’s potential maximized to include 1,000 homes, moving us further toward ending our housing shortage. Given that exhaust from personal automobiles account for approximately 25% of carbon emissions in California, encouraging transit ridership is paramount in achieving our regional sustainability goals. This project places homes within a half mile of the BART station, getting residents out of their cars, and decreasing vehicle miles traveled. Placing homes near transit, as this project does, is a primary sustainability feature as well as a transportation feature. With this in mind, BayHAC would like to see the project decrease the number of parking spaces. Parking drives up housing costs and increases congestion, undermining the project’s proximity to transit. While it is clear the proposal helps achieve regional goals, the project team is committed to the strongest community benefits package land valuation will allow for. A properly backed project would implement approximately 3 acres of open space improvements (both on the property as well as beyond the property boundaries) that would be accessible to the public. Improvements would include upgrades to Centennial Way, an outdoor plaza near a new Market Hall, new landscaped bike and pedestrian connections between Mission Road and El Camino, new recreation areas for kids and adults along Colma Creek, and new landscaping around and throughout the site. These would be provided alongside a childcare center serving 75-100 local families, makerspaces to further activate local commerce, and $17 million in impact fees to be reinvested in the city. The team has also laid out a vision with flexibility in the design. Flex zoning in some units would allow the site to be responsive to local demand for either makerspace retail or housing. This is evidence of a design built on the community’s needs. The project team has also made an ongoing good-faith effort to engage the community and receive input. Our Committee would like to specifically commend their implementation of the “coUrbanize” platform to provide an accessible forum for transparent community interaction. Ultimately, BayHAC is proud to support this project proposal, which will create a significant number of well- designed, well-located homes, thereby achieving both the region’s goals and those of local residents. Sincerely, Todd David, Executive Director Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition Attachment 3 122 August 13, 2019 Karyl Matsumoto, Mayor of South San Francisco Members of the Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission City Hall, 400 Grand Ave South San Francisco, CA, 94080 RE: South San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SSF PUC) Site Project Dear Mayor Matsumoto and Members of the Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission, For over 60 years, Greenbelt Alliance has been the champion of places that make the Bay Area special. Greenbelt Alliance’s 2017 report At Risk: The Bay Area Greenbelt concluded that over 293,000 acres of open space remain at risk within the next 30 years. To ease development pressure on these vital lands, we must work together to encourage smart development. Since the 1980s, we have provided an independent validation of outstanding infill development to help ensure that good development happens in the right places. Our endorsements have helped improve more than 140 neighborhoods around the region and have helped make the Bay Area a better place to live. Greenbelt Alliance is pleased to endorse the “South San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Site” This 806-unit, 20% affordable, mixed-use development is situated within both the South San Francisco El Camino/Chestnut Area Plan and the El Camino Real-South San Francisco Priority Development Area. With the South San Francisco BART station less than ½ mile north of the site, this is a key location for delivering good quality, high -density housing in close proximity to transit. Partitioned by Colma Creek, the project consists of three buildings including a 13,000 s.f. Market Hall intended for local production businesses, an 8,300 s.f. childcare facility, as well as thoughtful and supportive community amenities and 1.5 acres of public open space. The South SF PUC Site will deliver a walkable and vibrant community for residents across the income spectrum, support the local economy, relieve development pressure on the region’s open spaces, and offer a host of other e nvironmental and quality of life benefits, transforming one of the largest underutilized sites in the Bay Area into a vibrant, sustainable, walkable community with homes, shops, jobs, and parks in close proximity. This project will contribute essential connections along the Centennial Trail, opening three new public entry points to the trail and showcasing a park, fitness station and playground, which will greatly benefit the surrounding neighborhood. We encourage the City of South San Francisco to continue improving local policies to encourage sustainable, equitable development. In particular, we recommend that the city maintain their commitment to increasing both the density and affordability of new developments. As the Mission Corridor grows, it i s important to increase resident’s access to transit and protected trail systems. In closing, this SSF PUC project is another smart step for South San Francisco to ensure the creation of affordable homes and vibrant, walkable communities. We hope its approval will inspire communities around the Bay Area to redouble their own smart growth efforts. Sincerely, Adam Garcia Planning and Research Manager [email protected] | 1-415-543-6771 x326 Attachment 4 123 124 125 126