HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 3662-1963Annexation of Portion of
California Golf Club Property
RESOLUTION NO. 3662
RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OF "UNINHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED
" PORTION OF CALIFORNIA GOLF CLUB PROPERTY "
AND GIVING NOTICE 0~' TIME AND ~LACE FOR HEARING
OF PROTESTS THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of South San
Francisco:
ii That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation
of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by
owners of not less than one-fourth of the land in the here-
inafter described territory, by area and by assessed value
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County
of San Mateo, was filed with the Council of the City of
South San Francisco on January 21, 1963 ,
requesting annexation of the hereinafter described terri-
tory to said City.
2. That the territory which the petitioners request
be annexed to the City of South San Francisco and which said
City and its Council propose to annex, is situated in the
County of San Mateo, State of California, hereby designated
as" Portion of California Golf Club Property "
and described as follows:
· I Il
Creek
nexa~
ado'
iht,
San
South
of be
pr0pe:
dis!
course
cribed
South 61°
feet and
of the ce;
f the State.
described in
;CO, by
of
~file
as E1
an-
.:.(
i' ~9~,~S.o~uthwood Subdivi
more or le~'~, to
! 30" West 150,00 feet" as
ce No.2091 thence along said cor~6ra
West 150.00 feet, South 88° 15' 40" We
69° 33' 30" West 343.90 feet to the intersecti8
thereof with corporate limits of the City of South San FranCis% ~
co as~stablished by Ordinance No.215 of said City, dated 9ecembe~~
1, 194~, and the ~northwesterly line of that certain subdivision ~"i
shown ~n t~ map ~nCitled "SO~H~D ~P NO.3 SO~H SAN ~ISC0:~ ~ -
~LI~!~'. filed in t~ office of the Recorder of the CounC~gf Sa0~
~tto. S~te of ~lifornia, on ~r~h 8~ 1945, in Book ~2~b~ps ~ ~
ac th%ce west aXong the 2
boundary of said,: ~ion, al ' ~'~ ~ ate l~it~(~~n~
No.215), 489.05 ~ ~ f West OrangeadeS,
as established bY a non-~r~*i~ ~~~
California" "~' ~i% $~!~-~ ~
Cot
Book 3307
(97112-P)
line oi
ly on
32°
the
to
tad:
,d November ~
said..i along sa~i~.JE
, 35.65 feef;
to to the
a
Eas t.
to the ~' , ~ said cu~e~
ceetral lan~le ~3O 29~, a dista~e~
West, tim~nt ~f~be preceding cu~e,
intersection of ~H~Easterly line
the center line of ~elve ~le Creek,
the limits of the CitF'Pf
feet and
feet to fhe
Orange Avenue
tinned point a]
South San
Ordinance~No.:
North 79° 11
feet, North
56.18 feet,
beginning.
a
of .95
by the her~in first ment~iqned
~ng said corporate limits as foll~s:
feet, South 85° 51' 40" East. 376.60
O ~ -
68.86 feet, SouZh~86 Oi 50 EaSt
35" Eas~ 174'26 f~et
to the point of
i · 1 [II
be mailed to each person to whom land within the territory
proposed to be annexed is assessed in the last equalized
assessment roll available on the date the proceedings were
initiated, at the address shown on assessment roll or as
known to said Clerk, and to any person who has filed his
name and address and the designation of the lands in which
he has any interest, either legal or equitable, with said
Clerk.
9. In the event any land within the territory proposed
to be annexed is owned by a County, the City Clerk is directed
to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be
mailed to the Board of Supervisors of such County, such no-
tice to be given not less than twenty (20) days before the
first public hearing on the proposed annexation.
10. In the event there is, upon the land proposed to
be annexed to said City, a structural improvement owned, be-
ing acquired or leased by a County fire protection district,
the City Clerk is directed to cause written notice of such
proposed annexation to be mailed to the governing body of such
district, such notice to be sent not less than twenty (20)
days before the first hearing upon such proposed annexation.
11. The City Clerk is directed to cause written notice
to be given to such other persons as may be legally entitled
thereto, in the manner required by law.
of South San Francisco at a
the 21st day of
following vote:
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regu-
larly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City
regular meeting held on
January , 19 63, by the
AYES, COUNCILMEN
Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew
Rocca, G. J. Rozzi, and Frank Bertucelli
NOES, " None
ABSENT, " None
Attest:
City Clerk