Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-15-24 Planning Commission Meeting AgendaThursday, August 15, 2024 7:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Library Parks & Recreation Building, Council Chambers, Room 135 901 Civic Campus Way, South San Francisco, CA Planning Commission NORMAN FARIA, Chairperson SARAH FUNES-OZTURK, Vice Chairperson ALEX TZANG, Commissioner SAM SHIHADEH, Commissioner MICHELE EVANS, Commissioner AYSHA PAMUKCU, Commissioner JOHN BAKER, Commissioner Regular Meeting Agenda In-Person Meeting 1 August 15, 2024Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda How to observe the Meeting (no public comment): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26, Comcast, Channel 27, or AT&T, Channel 99 2) https://www.ssf.net/Government/Video-Streaming-City-and-Council-Meetings/Planning-Commission 3) https://www.youtube.com/@CityofSouthSanFrancisco/streams How to Submit written Public Comment before the meeting: Email: PCcomments@ssf.net Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting. The email will be monitored during the meeting.The City encourages the submission of comments by 6:00pm on the date of the Public Hearing to facilitate inclusion in the meeting record. Written comments received prior to 6:00pm on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record, but will not be read aloud at the meeting. How to provide Public Comment during the meeting: COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER During a meeting, comments can only be made in person: Complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chambers. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americanswith Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at all-cc@ssf.net. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at all-cc@ssf.net, 72-hours before the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024 2 August 15, 2024Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak on any item not listed on the Agenda, and on any items listed under the Consent Calendar. Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is written on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. Written comments received prior to 6:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record, but will not be read aloud. DISCLOSURE OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for Planning Commissioners to disclose any communications, including site visits, they have had on current agenda items, or any conflict of interest regarding current agenda items. CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration and approval of minutes from the August 1st, 2024 Planning Commission 1. 08-01-24 PC Final MinutesAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024 3 August 15, 2024Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding consideration and approval of two applications for Conditional Use Permits and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plans to allow conforming status of two existing Amazon parcel hubs (processing and/or redistribution parcel facilities) located at 250 Utah Avenue and 400 Littlefield Avenue in the Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning District with an off-site parking lot at 501 S. Airport Boulevard in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Class 1, Section 15301. (Victoria Kim, Associate Planner) 2. Attachment 1_Draft Findings Attachment 2_Conditions of Approval Attachment 3_Project Descriptions Attachment 4_Project Plans and Site Photographs Attachment 5_Traffic Analyses Attachment 6_Updated TDM Plans Attachment 7_Parking Agreement (Memo of Lease) Attachments: ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Report regarding a request for approval of a Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP) for Celeste Apartments, an existing multi-family residential development located at 401 Cypress Avenue in the Downtown Transit Core Zoning District (DTC) in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), and that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Christy Usher, Senior Planner) 3. Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Attachment 2 Parking Garage Floor Plans Attachment 3 Parking Management and Monitoring Plan Attachments: The Commission has adopted a policy that applicants and their representatives have a maximum time limit of 20 minutes to make a presentation on their project. Non-applicants may speak a maximum of 3 minutes on any agenda item. Questions from Commissioners to applicants or non-applicants may be answered by using additional time. ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024 4 August 15, 2024Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda **Any interested party will have 15 calendar days from the date of an action or decision taken by the Planning Commission to appeal that action or decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk as provided under Chapter 20.570 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. In the event an appeal period ends on a Saturday, Sunday, or any other day the City is closed, the appeal period shall end at the close of business on the next consecutive business day. The cost to appeal for applicants, residents, and all others is as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024 5 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-781 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:1. Consideration and approval of minutes from the August 1st, 2024 Planning Commission City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™6 August 1, 2024 Minutes Page 1 of 2 MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2024 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TIME: 7:01 PM AGENDA REVIEW No changes. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF • Planning to present to the City Council on Wednesday, October 9 PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR – Voting Key: (yes, no, abstain) 1. Consideration and approval of minutes from the June 20, 2024 Planning Commission Motion to approve: Commissioner Shihadeh, Second – Commissioner Pamukcu, approved by roll call (5-0-1) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2024-08-01 7:00 PM - In-Person Meeting (granicus.com) 2. Approval of Master Sign Program and Design Review applications for an existing life science campus located at the corner of Veterans Boulevard and Oyster Point Boulevard in the Business Technology Park in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, subject to conditions of approval and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. (Christy Usher, Senior Planner) Motion to approve: Commissioner Baker, ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS PRESENT: Chair Faria, Vice Chair Funes-Ozturk Commissioners: Baker, Pamukcu, Shihadeh, Tzang ABSENT: Evans STAFF PRESENT: Adena Friedman – Chief Planner - Billy Gross – Principal Planner –Kelsey Evans – Clerk 7 August 1, 2024 Minutes Page 2 of 2 Second – Commissioner Shihadeh, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2024-08-01 7:00 PM - In-Person Meeting (granicus.com) PUBLIC HEARING 3. Report regarding a Public Hearing for the 45-day comment period from June 20, 2024 to August 5, 2024 for the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed 131 Terminal development project for a new 1.7 million square feet research and development (R&D) campus at 131 Terminal Court. (Billy Gross, Principal Planner) Public Hearing Opened 7:07pm Public Hearing Closed 8:17pm • John Medina made a public comment on item #3. • Tom Trayor made a public comment on item #3. • Bart Pantoja made a public e-comment on item #3. ACTION: Informational: None taken, none required Meeting Video: Planning Commission on 2024-08-01 7:00 PM - In-Person Meeting (granicus.com) ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION None. ADJOURNMENT Chair Faria adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 8:23PM. Adena Friedman, Chief Planner Norm Faria, Chairperson or Sarah Funes-Ozturk, Vice Chairperson Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Commission City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco AF/af 8 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-766 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. Report regarding consideration and approval of two applications for Conditional Use Permits and Transportation Demand Management (TDM)Plans to allow conforming status of two existing Amazon parcel hubs (processing and/or redistribution parcel facilities)located at 250 Utah Avenue and 400 Littlefield Avenue in the Mixed Industrial High (MIH)Zoning District with an off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport Boulevard in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC)and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),per Class 1,Section 15301.(Victoria Kim, Associate Planner) MOTION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Move to determine the project is exempt from CEQA. 2.Move to approve the planning entitlements subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and take the following actions: 1.Determine that the Project is categorically exempt under the provision of CEQA,Class 1,Section 15301, Existing Facilities. 2.Approve the entitlements request for Projects P23-0124 &P23-0125 including Use Permits (UP23-0124 &UP23-0125)and TDM Plans (TDM23-0008 &TDM23-0007),subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The applicant (Amazon)operates two legally established parcel hubs in the East of 101 area,one at 250 Utah Avenue (established in 2016),and one at 400 Littlefield Avenue (established in 2020).When Amazon first began to operate these uses,a parcel hub was included in the “freight /truck terminal”use classification and was a permitted use in the Mixed Industrial (MI) zoning district (which was the zoning district at the time). In 2021,the City Council adopted a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that included a new land use sub- classification for parcel hub, under the Warehousing, Storage, and Distribution land use classification. Per Zoning Code Section 20.620.050, Industrial / R&D Use Classifications, a parcel hub is defined as: a “Last Mile”facility or similar establishment for the processing and/or redistribution of parcels or products.A Parcel Hub’s primary function is moving a shipment from one mode of transport to vehicles with rated capacities less than 10,000 pounds,for delivery directly to consumers or end-users primarily within a 10-mile radius. This Amendment also established the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)for Parcel Hub uses in the MI Zoning District.In 2022,the sites were both rezoned to be Mixed-Industrial,High (MIH),and a CUP is required for Parcel Hub uses in the MIH (consistent with the previous zoning). City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/7/2024Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™9 File #:24-766 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. While both of the subject parcel hubs were established legally,prior to the requirement of a CUP,a CUP is now required,since Amazon is proposing to add an off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport Boulevard (approximately one mile from each of the parcel hub locations).This is considered an expansion of an existing use,which triggers the need for a CUP in order to conform with the existing zoning requirements of the district. The proposed off-site parking lot located at 501 S.Airport Boulevard was approved for the Hertz Corporation’s flagship sales store and vehicle rental space,as an automobile /vehicle sales and leasing facility,primarily to serve ride-sharing companies (approved with a Condition Use Permit in 2019,P19-0053).Hertz no longer utilizes the site,as the demand for rental cars dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic.Amazon is proposing to use the 501 S.Airport Boulevard site for an off-site parking space for delivery vans and van drivers’personal vehicles,supporting the last mile distribution operations at both the 250 Utah and 400 Littlefield sites.This is considered consistent with the previous approved use,as the site would be used for vehicle parking and storage (similar to the CUP for automobile / vehicle sales and leasing). Site Overview The 250 Utah Avenue project site (Amazon site DSF5)is comprised of two approximately 585,500-square-foot (13.4 acres)parcels located on the south side of Utah Avenue,west of Littlefield Avenue.Amazon occupies the western portion (121,558 square feet)of the existing one-story 302,238-square-foot warehouse and office building along with other tenants,including wholesale distribution,logistics,and e-commerce delivery companies.The surrounding land uses are warehousing,storage and distribution,and service commercial uses. The main access to the project site is from Utah Avenue on the north,and the secondary access is from Littlefield Avenue on the south. The second project site is located at 400 Littlefield Avenue (Amazon site DSA5),0.3 miles from 250 Utah Avenue.The site (Approx.226,960 square feet)includes an existing one-story 166,590-square-foot building containing a 163,910-square-foot warehouse and 2,680-square-foot office space.The applicant has been the sole tenant occupying the building and operating the parcel hub since 2020 (Business License No.112295).The adjacent land uses are biotech companies on the north,metal fabricator and logistics companies on the east,a transportation company on the south,and office buildings and distribution companies on the west.The primary access to the site is from Littlefield Avenue on the west via two driveways. Project Description The applicant would like to continue operations of the existing parcel hub uses at both project sites without any modifications to the existing physical conditions.The expansion of the two project sites would include an additional delivery vehicle parking lot,the off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport Boulevard,to support the delivery service operations at 250 Utah and 400 Littlefield sites. Operation Plan Both project locations will continue to operate 24 hours a day,seven days a week,to support the last mile delivery of packages between 11:00 am and 9:00 pm.Thirteen line-haul trucks deliver packages to 250 Utah Avenue,and 11 line-haul trucks arrive at 400 Littlefield Avenue every day between 10:00 pm and 8:00 am.The following table shows numbers of employees at each project site with shift hours (Ref. Attachment 3). Table 1. Amazon Employees and Drivers City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/7/2024Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™10 File #:24-766 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. One hundred delivery service drivers arrive at 501 S.Airport Boulevard (off-site parking lot)in privately owned vehicles or by public transit between 9:20 am and 9:50 am.The drivers pick up delivery vans and head to the parcel hub location at 250 Utah Avenue,begin loading packages between 9:50 am and 11:50 am,and leave from the parcel hub station starting at 10:10 am at a rate of 24 vans every 20 minutes to mitigate traffic impacts during peak traffic hours.After eight to ten hours of delivery service,the vans return to the off-site parking lot between 7:00 pm and 9:00 pm. At 400 Littlefield Avenue,the first 75 delivery service drivers arrive in three waves at 9:20 am,9:50 am,and 10:50 am,park their personal vehicles and collect delivery vans,start loading the vans,and leave the site between 9:50 am and 11:10 am in waves every 20 minutes.Another 75 delivery service drivers arrive at the off- site parking lot by public transit or in their vehicles between 10:30 and 11:30 am in three waves.Then,they will pick up delivery vans from the off-site parking lot and arrive at 400 Littlefield Avenue.Once the delivery vans are loaded with packages,the delivery drivers depart the project site at 10:30 am,10:50 am,and 11:30 am in three waves to alleviate traffic flow.The drivers’shifts would end after eight to ten hours,and they would return to the parcel hub and then back to the off-site parking location. The applicant is also proposing 40 Amazon Flex Operations drivers (contract workers)at each site,delivering packages in their personal vehicles every day.These contractors arrive at the parcel hub sites between 4:00 pm and 5:00 pm and leave every 15 minutes after loading packages. ZONING CONSISTENCY Land Use The two project sites are located in the Mixed Industrial High (MIH)Zoning District.Pursuant to SSFMC Section 20.100.002 (Nonresidential Zoning Districts),parcel hubs are permitted in the MIH Zoning District, subject to the approval of CUP. The proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport is located in the Business and Technology Park-High (BTP- H)Zoning District.Under the previously approved CUP for Automobile /Vehicle Sales and Leasing (P19- 0053),the majority of the site was used for vehicle parking.The proposed off-site storage use will maintain the site as vehicle parking and will also allow for future site redevelopment.Thus,the off-site parking is considered consistent with the previously approved CUP, and would be a conditionally permitted use. Parking Management and Monitoring Study Per SSFMC Section 20.300.004 (Required Parking Spaces),parcel hubs do not have a specified amount of on- site parking,are required to provide a Parking Management and Monitoring Study,which establishes theCity of South San Francisco Printed on 8/7/2024Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™11 File #:24-766 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. site parking,are required to provide a Parking Management and Monitoring Study,which establishes the parking demand for the project, as well as a plan for providing and managing parking. Based on the project descriptions (Ref.Attachment 3),there are 174 parking stalls for 122 Amazon associates,4 trailer loading spaces,and 24 van loading spaces for delivery drivers inside the building at 250 Utah Avenue.At 400 Littlefield Avenue,176 parking spaces are provided for 120 warehouse associates and 78 van parking spaces for 75 delivery drivers, 25 van loading spaces, and 9 trailer spaces. Amazon employees have staggered work shifts (shown in Table 1,above),and the arrival and departure windows for delivery drivers are in waves to mitigate traffic impacts to neighboring businesses and surrounding areas.Also,all employees’schedules are designed to avoid peak hours (Ref.Attachment 5)during the weekdays, with the exception of contracted delivery drivers (Amazon Flex Operations). Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan A Transportation Demand Management (TDM)plan (TDM20-0009)was previously approved for 400 Littlefield Avenue in 2020,and a TDM plan (TDM15-0005)for 250 Utah Avenue was submitted in 2015 and approved in 2016.The applicant submitted updated TDM plans (Ref.Attachment 6)for the parcel hub properties based on the proposed updated project scope.The City’s TDM ordinance (SSFMC Chapter 20.400) requires a TDM plan for any non-residential development that generates 100 or more daily trips.The applicant’s TDM plans estimate that the DSF5 site (250 Utah Avenue)generates approximately 690 daily trips, including 184 commute trips by on-site employees and 506 delivery trips by the delivery service drivers.The DFA5 site (400 Littlefield Avenue)would generate 879 daily trips,including 180 commute trips by on-site employees and 699 delivery trips.The updated TDM plans are based on the City’s 2022 Transportation Analysis Guidelines,intended to achieve a minimum of 30 points for warehouse/distribution and industrial uses (Tier 2),which is consistent with the requirements of the City’s TDM ordinance.Based on the submitted TDM plans, the TDM plans are satisfying 31 points out of 30 required points (Ref. Attachment 6). The updated TDM plans for both project sites include a range of measures that are appropriate to the site and consistent with the updated TDM ordinance,including 50%Transit Pass Subsidies,carpool/vanpool programs and parking,bicycle parking and amenities,a designated TDM coordinator,improved bicycle and pedestrian connections,and flexible work schedules.The TDM Plan will be subject to annual reporting and monitoring pursuant to the City’s TDM ordinance (SSFMC Section 20.400.006).Draft conditions of approval are included, requiring the implementation of the TDM Plans (Ref. Attachment 2). Off-Site Parking Lot The applicant proposes to add the off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport Boulevard to serve as personal vehicle parking for drivers during their shifts,and to store delivery service vans after 9:00 pm when deliveries are completed.Currently,the off-site parking lot consists of 424 surface parking spaces on a 207,781 square foot parcel (4.77 acres).230 vans for the DSF5 site (250 Utah Avenue)and 130 vans for the DFA5 site (400 Littlefield Avenue)are assigned to be parked at the off-site parking lot,per an executed parking agreement between Amazon and the owner of 501 S. Airport Boulevard (Ref. Attachment 7). The only access to the parking lot is from S.Airport Boulevard driveway and all westbound left turns out of the parcel are restricted.All street frontages of the off-site parking lot will be screened by three-foot-tall shrubs to protect views from the S.Airport Boulevard on the west and N.Access Road on the south in accordance with SSFMC Section 20.330.010 (Parking Area Design and Development Standards).This requirement is included as a Condition of Approval. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/7/2024Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™12 File #:24-766 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The adopted General Plan (Shape SSF)designates the two project sites as Mixed Industrial High (MIH),and the parcel hub use is consistent with the City’s General Plan vision and land use description:high-density industrial lands for a wide range of uses.The continuation of the existing parcel hubs is compatible with the intended high-density industrial land use designation.The off-site parking use at 501 S.Airport Boulevard is consistent with the previously approved use permit for Automobile /Vehicle Sales and Leasing,as the site will operate as vehicle parking and storage.Additionally,utilizing this site as off-site parking does not preclude future redevelopment of more intense commercial uses, consistent with the General Plan vision. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed continuation of the parcel hubs and the establishment of the offsite parking facility are categorically exempt under the provision of CEQA guidelines (Class 1,Section 15301,Existing Facilities), since no construction or alteration of the existing uses are proposed.The project would not make any changes to the subject sites, and no further environmental analysis is required. CONCLUSION Approving the two Use Permits for the continuation of existing parcel hubs at 400 Littlefield Avenue and 250 Utah Avenue will provide conforming status the current parcel hub operations and allow for expansion of the uses,but inclusion of the off-site parking lot at 501 S.Airport Boulevard.The continuation of parcel hub uses and the off-site parking will not hinder implementation of the General Plan vision,will be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance requirements,and will ensure that the parcel hubs will continue to operate as legal, conforming uses.The updated TDM plans for both project sites will help support the City’s goals of reducing vehicle miles traveled,managing traffic congestion,and utilization of City’s alternative transportation modes. Therefore,staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Use Permits (UP23-0006 &UP23- 0007)and Transportation Demand Management Plans (TDM23-0008 &TDM23-0009),subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1.Findings 2.Conditions of Approval 3.Project Descriptions 4.Project Plans and Photographs 5.Traffic Analyses 6.Updated TDM Plans with TDM Checklists 7.Parking Agreement (Memo of Lease) City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/7/2024Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™13 FINDINGS OF APPROVAL P23-0124: UP 23-0006 & TDM23-0008 250 UTAH AVENUE (As recommended by City Planning Staff on August 15, 2024) As required by the Use Permit Procedures (SSFMC Chapter 20.490) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) (SSFMC Chapter 20.400), the following findings are made in support of a Use Permit and a TDM plan for a parcel hub use at 250 Utah Avenue in Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning District with an off-site parking lot at 501 S. Airport Boulevard in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), based on materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco Planning Division which include, but are not limited to: Application materials prepared by applicant, submitted November 28, 2023; Use Permit staff report dated August 15, 2024; and Conditions of Approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Ordinance and all other titles of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. Supportive Evidence: The project site is located within the Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning District. Pursuant to the land use regulations in Sections 20.100.002, parcel hubs are permitted in Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning Districts with a Conditional Use Permit. B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. Supportive Evidence: The project is consistent with the General Plan which designates the site as Mixed Industrial High land use and the parcel hub is meeting the intent of the adopted General Plan Designation. C. The proposed use will not be adverse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. Supportive Evidence: The project will not adversely impact the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, or be detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. The parcel hub will be operated within an existing building and no exterior alteration is proposed. D. The proposed use complies with any design or development standards applicable to the zoning district or the use in question as may be adopted by a resolution of the Planning Commission and/or the City Council. Supportive Evidence: The project complies with design and development standards applicable to the MIH Zoning District and use. No exterior modification is proposed, and the proposed use would be operated within the existing facility. 14 Findings of Approval E. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses in the vicinity. Supportive Evidence: The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project would be compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses in the vicinity. The project would be within the existing structure and no exterior change is proposed. F. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. Supportive Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the project use, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. The main access to the project site would remain the same from Utah Avenue and no physical expansion of the existing building is proposed. G. An environmental determination has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Supportive Evidence: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, staff has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt per the provisions of Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities. H. The proposed TDM program is feasible and appropriate for the project, considering the proposed use or mix of uses and the project’s location, size, and hours of operation. Supportive Evidence: The submitted TDM plan is satisfying 31 points out of 30 required points. The TDM plan includes a range of measures that are appropriate to the site, including carpool/vanpool programs and parking, bicycle parking and amenities, designated TDM coordinator, improved bicycle and pedestrian connections, and flexible work schedules. I. The proposed TDM program meets the points requirements indicated for the tier and land use of the project. Supportive Evidence: The minimum 30 points are required for warehouse/distribution use (Tier 2) and the project TDM Plan proposes 31 points out of 30 required points. 15 Findings of Approval FINDINGS OF APPROVAL P23-0125: UP 23-0007 & TDM23-0009 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE (As recommended by City Planning Staff on August 15, 2024) As required by the Use Permit Procedures (SSFMC Chapter 20.490) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) (SSFMC Chapter 20.400), the following findings are made in support of a Use Permit and a TDM plan for a parcel hub use at 400 Littlefield Avenue in Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning District with an off-site parking lot at 501 S. Airport Boulevard in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), based on materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco Planning Division which include, but are not limited to: Application materials prepared by applicant, submitted November 28, 2023; Use Permit staff report dated August 15, 2024; and Conditions of Approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Ordinance and all other titles of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. Supportive Evidence: The project site is located within the Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning District. Pursuant to the land use regulations in Sections 20.100.002, parcel hubs are permitted in Mixed Industrial High (MIH) Zoning Districts with a Conditional Use Permit. B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. Supportive Evidence: The project is consistent with the General Plan which designates the site as Mixed Industrial High land use and the parcel hub is meeting the intent of the adopted General Plan Designation. C. The proposed use will not be adverse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. Supportive Evidence: The project will not adversely impact the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, or be detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. The existing parcel hub will be operated within an existing building and no exterior alteration is proposed. D. The proposed use complies with any design or development standards applicable to the zoning district or the use in question as may be adopted by a resolution of the Planning Commission and/or the City Council. Supportive Evidence: The project complies with design and development standards applicable to the MIH Zoning District and use. No exterior modification is proposed, and the proposed use would be operated within the existing facility. 16 Findings of Approval E. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses in the vicinity. Supportive Evidence: The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project would be compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses in the vicinity. The project would be within the existing structure and no exterior change is proposed. F. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. Supportive Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the project use, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. The access to the project site would remain the same from the Littlefield Avenue and no physical expansion of the existing building is proposed. G. An environmental determination has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Supportive Evidence: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, staff has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt per the provisions of Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities. H. The proposed TDM program is feasible and appropriate for the project, considering the proposed use or mix of uses and the project’s location, size, and hours of operation. Supportive Evidence: The submitted TDM plan is satisfying 31 points out of 30 required points. The TDM plan includes a range of measures that are appropriate to the site, including carpool/vanpool programs and parking, bicycle parking and amenities, designated TDM coordinator, improved bicycle and pedestrian connections, and flexible work schedules. I. The proposed TDM program meets the points requirements indicated for the tier and land use of the project. Supportive Evidence: The minimum 30 points are required for warehouse/distribution use (Tier 2) and the project TDM Plan proposes 31 points out of 30 required points. 17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P23-0124: UP23-0006 & TDM23-0008 250 UTAH AVENUE (As recommended by City Planning Staff on August 15, 2024) A. Planning Division requirements shall be as follows: 1. The applicant shall comply with the City of South San Francisco, Department of Economic and Community Development – Planning Division, standard Conditions and Limitations for Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family Residential Projects. 2. The construction drawing shall substantially comply with the approved plans submitted June 21, 2024, as approved by the Planning Commission for UP23-0006, as amended by the Conditions of Approval. The final plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Chief Planner. 3. The business shall operate substantially as outlined in Project Description dated November 30, 2023 (Ref. Attachment 3). 4. All parking areas shall be maintained clear of litter and storage at all the time. No outdoor storage of materials is allowed, and no work shall be conducted outside of a building. 5. The off-site parking lot shall maintain the 3 feet shrub screening along the S. Airport Boulevard and N. Access Road, and the applicant shall maintain the landscape proposed to meet the landscaping requirement. All existing and proposed landscaped areas shall be permanently maintained in compliance with Chapter 20.330.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The applicant has prepared and submitted an updated TDM Plan in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.400, Transportation Demand Management. Prior to issuance of encroachment permit the applicant shall submit an annual self-certification/ compliance form for review and approval by the Chief Planner. a) The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall include all mandatory elements included in the Ordinance in place at the time of encroachment permit applications submittal and shall substantially reflect the updated TDM Plan prepared by Amazon modified as necessary to reflect the structure of the current Ordinance. The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall be designed to ultimately achieve the requirements of a Tier 2 project. b) The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall outline the required process for on-going monitoring beginning one (1) year after the granting of encroachment permit for the first 20 years, based on Tier 2. c) The applicant shall be required to reimburse the City for program costs associated 18 with monitoring and enforcing the TDM Program on an annual basis. The annual monitoring fee is $3,637, and is updated by the City Council on an annual basis. The monitoring fee for the Project’s first year of operation is due to the City prior to the project receiving encroachment permits. d) Prior to approval of the encroachment permit, tenants shall submit a letter demonstrating concurrence with the annual self-certification/ compliance form. The letter shall acknowledge how applicable TDM requirements are identified in their lease and summarize how the tenant is implementing applicable TDM measures. 7. The use permit shall be subject to revocation if the lease for parking is terminated. 8. The applicant shall provide written notice to the City of termination of the parking lease. (Planning Division contact person: Victoria Kim, Associate Planner (650) 877-8535) 19 B. Engineering Division requirements shall be as follows: 1. Within six (6) months of issuance of the Conditional Use Permit (UP23-0006), the applicant shall submit detailed design plans to the City for driveway accessibility upgrades consistent with the Americans with Disability Act on the three driveways shown on Exhibit A ("Driveway Accessibility Upgrades"). 2. Within six (6) months of the City's approval of the design plans, the applicant shall apply for encroachment permit for the Driveway Accessibility Upgrades. 3. Within six (6) months of approval of the encroachment permit, the applicant shall use reasonable efforts to complete the Driveway Accessibility Upgrades. (Engineering Division contact: Anthony Schaffer, Interim Development Engineer at (650) 829-6667) 20 EXHIBIT A. DRIVEWAY ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES 21 EXISTING RAMP (DOWN)1183201764A3AAA A AA AAMOVE JACKMOVE DOORFLIP ALL4AA289' - 1"CONFERENCE ROOM6EXISTING RAMP (DOWN)TENANT SPACEPROJECT AREAADJACENT TENANTS, NOT IN SCOPE3(N) CONTRSUCTION (E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN(EXISTING: GRAY LINES)(NEW: BLACK LINES)NOTES:1. NO DEMOLITION PROPOSED(E) CONTRSUCTION TO BE REMOVED(E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAINDOOR TYPE TAGxxx(EXISTING: GRAY LINES)(DEMO: RED LINES)Nelco Architecture, Inc.1200 Fifth Ave., Suite 1300Seattle, WA. 98101Phone: (206) 408-8500WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMCONSULTANTARCHITECTPROJECT NAMEISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager:Reviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:COVID-19 NOTICE:SOME GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY OWNER/OCCUPANT, HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS. NOT ALL SPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING OR SITE HAVE BEEN REDESIGNED WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES IN MIND. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THESE PLANS DO NOT CONSIDER ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES WHICH OWNER/OCCUPANT MAY DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOCIAL DISTANCE, INDOOR AIR QUALITY, AIR VENT LOCATIONS, AND USE AND QUALITY OF PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. NELSON MAKES NO GUARANTEES OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE EFFECTIVE ABILITY OF THESE PLANS TO PREVENT ONSET OF COVID-19.U:\Proj\Amazon\CA\24.0000588.000-DSF5 - R4 South San Francisco, CA\DRAWINGS\MODELS-3D\DSF5 Ph2 - ARCH .rvt5/20/2024 2:36:28 PMA0.00SITE PLAN250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA94080CheckerApproverAuthor22.0001795.000DSF5 - TENANTIMPROVEMENTSI.F.P.CheckerDSF5 -TENANTIMPROVEMENTSDESCRIPTION ∆ DATE1" = 40'-0"1EXISTING SITE PLAN (FOR REFERENCEONLY)LEGENDS - EXISTING & PROPOSEDLEGENDS - EXISTING & DEMOLITIONSITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT SITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT SITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P23-0125: UP23-0007 & TDM23-0009 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE (As recommended by City Planning Staff on August 15, 2024) A. Planning Division requirements shall be as follows: 1. The applicant shall comply with the City of South San Francisco, Department of Economic and Community Development – Planning Division, standard Conditions and Limitations for Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family Residential Projects. 2. The construction drawing shall substantially comply with the approved plans submitted June 21, 2024, as approved by the Planning Commission for UP23-0007, as amended by the Conditions of Approval. The final plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Chief Planner. 3. The business shall operate substantially as outlined in Project Description dated November 30, 2023 (Ref. Attachment 3). 4. All parking areas shall be maintained clear of litter and storage at all the time. No outdoor storage of materials is allowed, and no work shall be conducted outside of a building. 9. The off-site parking lot shall maintain the 3 feet shrub screening along the S. Airport Boulevard and N. Access Road, and the applicant shall maintain the landscape proposed to meet the landscaping requirement. All existing and proposed landscaped areas shall be permanently maintained in compliance with Chapter 20.330.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. The applicant has prepared and submitted an updated TDM Plan in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.400, Transportation Demand Management. Prior to issuance of encroachment permit for the Conditional Use Permit (UP23-0006), the applicant shall submit an annual self-certification/ compliance form for review and approval by the Chief Planner. a) The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall include all mandatory elements included in the Ordinance in place at the time of encroachment permit applications submittal and shall substantially reflect the updated TDM Plan prepared by Amazon modified as necessary to reflect the structure of the current Ordinance. The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall be designed to ultimately achieve the requirements of a Tier 2 project. b) The annual self-certification/ compliance form shall outline the required process for on-going monitoring beginning one (1) year after the granting of issuance of encroachment permit for the first 20 years, based on Tier 2. 23 c) The applicant shall be required to reimburse the City for program costs associated with monitoring and enforcing the TDM Program on an annual basis. The annual monitoring fee is $3,637, and is updated by the City Council on an annual basis. The monitoring fee for the Project’s first year of operation is due to the City prior to the project receiving encroachment permit. d) Prior to approval of the encroachment permit, tenants shall submit a letter demonstrating concurrence with the annual self-certification/ compliance form. The letter shall acknowledge how applicable TDM requirements are identified in their lease and summarize how the tenant is implementing applicable TDM measures. 11. The use permit shall be subject to revocation if the lease for parking is terminated. 12. The applicant shall provide written notice to the City of termination of the parking lease. (Planning Division contact person: Victoria Kim, Associate Planner (650) 877-8535) 24 DSF5 / 250 UTAH AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Project Description Project Overview Amazon (AMZL/Applicant) is applying for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to (1) grant legal, conforming status to its existing parcel hub use (the Delivery Station) at 250 Utah Avenue (Project Site); and (2) to authorize off-site parking for the Delivery Station at an existing parking lot at 501 South Airport Boulevard (the OSP Site) (collectively, the Project). The existing Delivery Station includes a 118,125-square-foot warehouse, with 3,433 square feet of interior office space, and 174 parking spaces. AMZL has been operating the Delivery Station since 2016. The use became legal, nonconforming in 2021, as a result of Zoning Code amendments. AMZL is applying for the CUP to bring the existing use into legal, conforming status. As part of this application, AMZL is not proposing any site work, structural modifications, interior tenant improvements, or other physical development at the Project Site. In addition, AMZL is seeking a CUP to authorize 230 off-site parking spaces in an existing parking lot at the OSP Site; these spaces will be used for delivery vans and van drivers’ personal vehicles. (1) Delivery Station Project Site The Project Site consists of three assessor parcels, totaling approximately 14 acres, which are located at 250 Utah Avenue, South San Francisco, California (APNs 015-155-060, 015-155-070 and 015-155-050). Amazon’s tenant space is a portion of APNs 015-155-060 and 015-155-050 and the entirety of APN 015- 155-070. The Project is bounded by Utah Avenue to the north, Littlefield Avenue to the east and south, and industrial buildings to the west. Primary access to the Project Site is from Utah Avenue. Secondary access is from Littlefield Avenue. Surrounding land uses are predominantly industrial. The General Plan designates the Project Site for Mixed Industrial. The Project Site is located within the Mixed Industrial High (MIH) zoning district. Pursuant to recent Zoning Code amendments, Parcel Hubs now require a CUP in the MIH zoning district.1 Existing Physical Development The Project Site is developed with a 301,900-square-foot industrial building, 307 surface parking spaces, and ancillary improvements. AMZL occupies 118,125-square-foot tenant space within the building and has the right to use 174 on-site parking spaces. AMZL has been operating at the Project Site since 2016. 1 See Zoning Code section 20.100.002, enacted in 2021. This requirement did not exist when AMZL commenced operations in 2016. 25 Proposed Physical Development AMZL does not propose any site work, structural modifications, interior tenant improvements, or other physical development at the Delivery Station or Project Site. AMZL is seeking the CUP for the Delivery Station for the sole purpose of bringing the existing use into legal, conforming status. Existing and Proposed Operations The following describes AMZL’s existing operations for the Delivery Station. AMZL does not propose any changes to the existing operations, with the exception of new off-site parking as detailed below in the “Off-Site Parking” section. Internal Delivery Station Operations The Delivery Station operates 24 hours per day/7 days a week to support last mile delivery of packages to customer locations primarily between 11:00 AM and 9:00 PM. AMZL has approximately 13 line-haul trucks delivering packages to the delivery station each day from neighboring Amazon fulfillment and sortation centers, primarily between the hours of 10:00 PM to 8:00 AM. The customer packages are sorted, picked to the delivery routes, placed onto movable racks and staged for dispatch. Total employees on site = 122  69 associates with shifts from 2:00 AM to 12:30 PM who will be supporting the unloading and sorting operation of the delivery station  16 associates with shifts from 6:00 AM to 2:30 PM who will be supervising the van loading and delivery operations  16 associates with shifts from 1:30 PM to 10:00 PM who supervise remaining delivery operations  21 associates with varying shifts from 12:00 PM to 10:30 PM to support the Flex and Delivery Service Provider (DSP) drivers as they return to the station. After the checkout and release of all delivery vehicles by 9:30 PM, delivery station associates prepare the delivery station for the next day’s packages. Delivery Service Provider / Van Delivery Operations DSPs commute to the OSP Site (described below) in their personal vehicles or by public transport, arriving at approximately 9:20 AM. They pick up delivery vans and drive to the delivery station, arriving at approximately 9:50 AM. Starting at approximately 9:50 AM and ending at 11:50 AM, approximately 100 delivery vans will load and depart from the delivery station at a rate of 24 vans (maximum) every 20 minutes to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area - meaning, the 1st wave of delivery vans leave the station at 10:10 AM. The departure window is designed to mitigate impacts on peak hour traffic periods. Approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, delivery routes are completed and the vans return to the offsite parking lot between approximately 7:00 PM and 9:00 PM. The drivers park their delivery van and leave using a personal vehicle or public transport. 26 Amazon Flex Operations AMZL also uses Amazon Flex, when necessary, to deliver packages from this location. This is an app-based service that allows independent contractors to sign up and schedule to make deliveries from their personal vehicles. As part of Amazon Flex, approximately 40 passenger vehicles enter the facility each day, staggered between 4:00 PM and 5:00 PM. Flex vehicles load and depart every 15 minutes and do not utilize parking spaces. Employment On a daily basis, the following approximate number of total employees are present on site:  122 associates, managers and dispatchers  100 van drivers  40 flex drivers In order to fulfill this daily workforce need, approximately 550-650 total workers are employed in relation to the Delivery Station. Site Circulation/Parking/Loading Total on-site parking for the Delivery Station consists of:  Approximately 174 code-required automobile parking spaces (including 7 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible spaces). These spaces are designated for automobile parking by Amazon warehouse staff (i.e., associates) who work at the Delivery Station, and do not include other tenant spaces.  24 van loading spaces in the building’s interior. All vans enter and exit the site using the driveway located on Utah Road.  4 trailer loading spaces proximal to dock doors on the northern facade of the building. All large line-haul (tractor trailer) trucks will exclusively enter and exit the Project Site via Utah Avenue extending north. In addition, the Delivery Station currently allocates approximately 230 off-site parking spaces at 101 Terminal Court for its van fleet. Due to pending development at 101 Terminal Court, Amazon is discontinuing this off-site parking. To replace it, Amazon proposes new off-site parking at 501 South Airport Blvd., as detailed below. A summary of the existing on-site and off-site parking is included in Table 1 below. 27 Table 1. Project Parking and Loading Type – On Site (250 Utah Avenue) Number of Spaces Parking Vehicle 174 Automobile 174 Delivery Van 0 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Parking 174 Active Loading and Queuing Van Loading 24 Truck/Trailer 4 Total Loading and Queuing 28 Total Spaces 202 Type – Off Site (501 S. Airport) Number of Spaces Parking Vehicle 230 Delivery Van 230 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Parking 230 Active Loading and Queuing Van Loading 0 Van Staging 0 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Loading and Queuing 0 Total Spaces 230 Alternative Transit and Electric Vehicle Charging The Project has an existing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) on file with the City. (See Attachment) 28 (2) Off-Site Parking AMZL seeks approval of an alternative parking plan to allow new off-site parking for the Delivery Station, pursuant to Zoning Code section 20.330.005. OSP Site Description The OSP Site consists of one parcel, totaling approximately 4.69 acres, located at 501 South Airport Blvd., South San Francisco, California (APN 015-173-150). The OSP Site is bounded by South Airport Blvd. to the west, a Costco gas station to the north, industrial uses to the east, and North Access Road to the south. Surrounding land uses are predominantly commercial and industrial. Access to the OSP Site is from South Airport Boulevard and North Access Road. The applicant proposes to restrict westbound left turn movements out of the driveway onto South Airport Boulevard. The OSP Site is located approximately 1.0 mile by car and 0.6 miles by foot from the Delivery Station. The General Plan designates the OSP Site for Business Commercial. The OSP Site is zoned Business Technology Park-High (BTP-H). Existing Development The OSP Site is currently developed with a single-story building, 424 surface parking spaces, and ancillary improvements. Proposed Development AMZL does not propose any physical development or new improvements at the OSP site. Landscaping is proposed to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Existing Operations The OSP Site is not currently being used. The City previously approved a CUP for the OSP Site authorizing a Hertz rental car operation. That CUP was never implemented and expired on November 3, 2023. Proposed Operations AMZL proposes to allocate 230 of the 424 parking spaces at the OSP Site to serve the Delivery Station. These spaces will be used to park DSP vans and van drivers’ personal vehicles. All van parking would be accessed via South Airport Blvd or North Access Road. Delivery Service Providers (DSP/van drivers) begin to arrive at the OSP at approximately 9:20 AM and retrieve their assigned fleet vehicle. Starting at approximately 9:50 AM, approximately 100 delivery vans will depart from the OSP by making a right at the driveway on South Airport Blvd to head to the station. The drivers will do so at a rate of 24 vans (maximum) every 20 minutes to head to 250 Utah Avenue to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. The departure window is designed to mitigate impacts on peak hour traffic periods. Approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, delivery routes are completed and the vans return to 250 Utah 29 Avenue between approximately 7:00 PM and 9:00 PM in staggered shifts, check in with their manager, then return to the OSP. The drivers park their delivery van and leave using a personal vehicle or public transport. AMZL is restricting all westbound left turns out of the South Airport Blvd driveway. AMZL does not propose to use the existing building or any other improvements at the OSP Site. Project Objectives The objectives of the Project include:  Establish the existing Delivery Station as a legal conforming use.  Establish new off-site parking for the Delivery Station to allow existing operations to continue.  Facilitate Amazon deliveries to the greater South San Francisco area.  Retain the existing operations on a property that is planned and zoned for industrial uses and that has access to existing infrastructure. Retain the existing operations adjacent to similar logistics, warehouse, and distribution facilities.  Limit impacts, including from delivery trucks, on residential areas within the City and neighboring jurisdictions.  Provide economic benefits to the City through continued capital investment and employment opportunities. Requested Entitlements The entitlements and approvals requested for the Project include:  A Conditional Use Permit to establish the Delivery Station as a legal, conforming use.  A Conditional Use Permit to authorize an alternative parking plan for the Delivery Station, including the use of 230 off-site parking spaces at the OSP Site.  Parking Agreement for the proposed off-site parking.  Any other approvals required to implement the Project. 30 DFA5 / 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Project Description Project Overview Amazon (AMZL/Applicant) is applying for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to (1) grant legal, conforming status to its existing parcel hub use (the Delivery Station) at 400 Littlefield Avenue (Project Site); and (2) to authorize off-site parking for the Delivery Station at an existing parking lot at 501 South Airport Boulevard (the OSP Site) (collectively, the Project). The existing Delivery Station includes a 163,910- square-foot warehouse, with 2,680 square feet of interior office space, 176 associate parking spaces and 78 van parking spaces. AMZL has been operating the Delivery Station since 2020. The use became legal, nonconforming in 2021, as a result of Zoning Code amendments. AMZL is applying for the CUP to bring the existing use into legal, conforming status. It is not proposing any site work, structural modifications, interior tenant improvements, or other physical development at the Project Site. In addition, AMZL is seeking a CUP to authorize 130 off-site parking spaces in an existing parking lot at the OSP Site; these spaces will be used for delivery vans and van drivers’ personal vehicles. (1) Delivery Station Project Site The Project Site consists of one assessor parcel, totaling approximately 8 acres, which is located at 400 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco, California (APN 015-133-220). The Project is bounded by Littlefield Avenue to the west and industrial buildings to the north, south, and east. Primary access to the Project Site is from Littlefield Avenue. Surrounding land uses are predominantly industrial. The General Plan designates the Project Site for Mixed Industrial. The Project Site is located within the Mixed Industrial High (MIH) zoning district. Pursuant to recent Zoning Code amendments, Parcel Hubs now require a CUP in the MIH zoning district.1 Existing Physical Development The Project Site is developed with a 163,910-square-foot industrial building, 254 parking spaces, and ancillary improvements. AMZL occupies the entire tenant space within the building and has the right to use all on-site parking spaces. AMZ has been operating at the Project Site since 2020. 1 See Zoning Code section 20.100.002, enacted in 2021. This requirement did not exist when AMZL commenced operations in 2020. 31 Proposed Physical Development AMZL does not propose any site work, structural modifications, interior tenant improvements, or other physical development at the Delivery Station or Project Site. AMZL is seeking the CUP for the Delivery Station for the sole purpose of bringing the existing use into legal, conforming status. Existing and Proposed Operations The following describes AMZL’s existing operations for the Delivery Station. AMZL does not propose any changes to the existing operations, with the exception of new off-site parking as detailed below in the “Off-Site Parking” section. Internal Delivery Station Operations The Delivery Station operates 24 hours per day/7 days a week to support last mile delivery of packages to customer locations primarily between 11:00 AM and 9:00 PM. AMZL has approximately 11 line-haul trucks delivering packages to the delivery station each day from neighboring Amazon fulfillment and sortation centers, primarily between the hours of 10:00 PM to 8:00 AM. The customer packages are sorted, picked to the delivery routes, placed onto movable racks and staged for dispatch. Total employees on site = 120  69 associates with shifts from 2:00 AM to 12:30 PM who will be supporting the unloading and sorting operation of the delivery station  15 associates with shifts from 6:00 AM to 2:30 PM who will be supervising the van loading and delivery operations  15 associates with shifts from 1:30 PM to 10:00 PM who supervise remaining delivery operations  21 associates with varying shifts from 12:00 PM to 10:30 PM to support the Flex and Delivery Service Provider (DSP) drivers as they return to the station. After the checkout and release of all delivery vehicles by 9:30 PM, delivery station associates prepare the delivery station for the next day’s packages. Delivery Service Provider / Van Delivery Operations DSPs in waves 1, 2, and 5 arrive at the delivery station in their personal vehicles at approximately 9:20 AM, 9:50 AM, and 10:50am respectively. At approximately 9:50 AM, 10:10 AM, and 11:10 AM, approximately 75 delivery vans will load and depart from the delivery station at a rate of 25 vans (maximum) every 20 minutes to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. Meaning, delivery vans parked onsite leave the station at 10:10 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:30 AM for waves 1, 2, and 5 respectively. DSPs in waves 3, 4, and 6 commute to the OSP site (described below) in their personal vehicles or by public transport arriving 10:00 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:00 AM, pick up their personal vehicles, and head to the delivery station. Starting at approximately 10:30 AM, 10:50 AM, and 11:30 AM, approximately 75 delivery vans will load and depart from the delivery station at a rate of 25 vans (maximum) to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. Meaning, delivery vans leave the station at 10:50 AM, 11:10 AM, and 11:50 AM for waves 3, 4, and 6 respectively. 32 The departure window is designed to mitigate impacts on peak hour traffic periods. Approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, delivery routes are completed and the vans return to the station between approximately 7:00 PM and 9:00 PM. Off-site delivery vans are encouraged to return back to the station before going back to the off-site parking lot. The drivers park their delivery van and leave using a personal vehicle or public transport. Amazon Flex Operations AMZL also uses Amazon Flex, when necessary, to deliver packages from this location. This is an app-based service that allows independent contractors to sign up and schedule to make deliveries from their personal vehicles. As part of Amazon Flex, approximately 40 passenger vehicles enter the facility each day, staggered between 4:00 PM and 5:00 PM. Flex vehicles load and depart every 15 minutes and do not utilize parking spaces. Employment On a daily basis, the following approximate number of total employees are present on site:  120 associates, managers and dispatchers  150 van drivers  40 Flex drivers In order to fulfill this daily workforce need, approximately 550-650 total workers are employed in relation to the Delivery Station. Site Circulation/Parking/Loading Total on-site parking for the Delivery Station consists of:  Approximately 176 code-required automobile parking spaces (including 9 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible spaces). These spaces are designated for automobile parking by Amazon warehouse staff (i.e., associates) who work at the Delivery Station.  Approximately 78 van parking spaces in the building’s interior  25 van loading spaces in the building’s interior. All vans enter and exit the site using the driveway located on Littlefield Avenue.  9 trailer loading spaces proximal to dock doors on the southern facade of the building. All large line-haul (tractor trailer) trucks will exclusively enter and exit the Project Site via Littlefield Avenue. In addition, the Delivery Station currently allocates approximately 130 off-site parking spaces at 101 Terminal Court for its van fleet. Due to pending development at 101 Terminal Court, Amazon is discontinuing this off-site parking. To replace it, Amazon proposes new off-site parking at 501 South Airport Blvd., as detailed below. A summary of the existing on-site and off-site parking is included in Table 1 below. 33 Table 1. Project Parking and Loading Type – On Site (400 Littlefield Avenue) Number of Spaces Parking Vehicle Automobile 176 Delivery Vans 78 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Parking 254 Active Loading and Queuing Van Loading 25 Truck/Trailer 9 Total Loading and Queuing 34 Total Spaces 288 Type – Off Site (501 S. Airport) Number of Spaces Parking Vehicle 0 Delivery Vans 130 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Parking 130 Active Loading and Queuing Van Loading 0 Van Staging 0 Truck/Trailer 0 Total Loading and Queuing 0 Total Spaces 130 Alternative Transit and Electric Vehicle Charging The Project has an existing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) on file with the City. (See Attachment) 34 (2) Off-Site Parking AMZL seeks approval of an alternative parking plan to allow new off-site parking for the Delivery Station, pursuant to Zoning Code section 20.330.005. OSP Site Description The OSP Site consists of one parcel, totaling approximately 4.69 acres, located at 501 South Airport Blvd., South San Francisco, California (APN 015-173-150). The OSP Site is bounded by South Airport Blvd. to the west, a Costco gas station to the north, industrial uses to the east, and North Access Road to the south. Surrounding land uses are predominantly commercial and industrial. Access to the OSP Site is from South Airport Boulevard and North Access Road. The applicant proposes to restrict westbound left turn movements out of the driveway onto South Airport Boulevard. The OSP Site is located approximately 1.0 mile by car and 1.0 mile by foot from the Delivery Station. The General Plan designates the OSP Site for Business Commercial. The OSP Site is zoned Business Technology Park-High (BTP-H). Existing Development The OSP Site is currently developed with a single-story building, 424 surface parking spaces, and ancillary improvements. Proposed Development AMZL does not propose any physical development or new improvements at the OSP site. Landscaping is proposed to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Existing Operations The OSP Site is not currently being used. The City previously approved a CUP for the OSP Site authorizing a Hertz rental car operation. That CUP was never implemented and expired on November 3, 2023. Proposed Operations AMZL proposes to allocate 130 of the 424 parking spaces at the OSP Site to serve the Delivery Station. These spaces will be used to park DSP vans and van drivers’ personal vehicles. All van parking would be accessed via South Airport Blvd or North Access Road. Delivery Service Providers (DSP/van drivers) begin to arrive in waves 3, 4, and 6 at the OSP at 10:00 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:00 AM respectively, and retrieve their assigned fleet vehicle. Starting at approximately 10:30 AM, 10:50 AM, and 11:30 AM, approximately 75 delivery vans will depart from the OSP by making a right at the driveway on South Airport Blvd to head to the station. The drivers will do so at a rate of 25 vans (maximum) every 20 minutes to head to 400 Littlefield Avenue to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. The departure window is designed to mitigate impacts on peak hour traffic periods. Approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, 35 delivery routes are completed and the vans return to 400 Littlefield Avenue between approximately 7:00 PM and 9:00 PM in staggered shifts, check in with their manager, then return to the OSP. The drivers park their delivery van and leave using a personal vehicle or public transport. AMZL is proposing to restrict all westbound left turns out of the South Airport Blvd driveway. AMZL does not propose to use the existing building or any other improvements at the OSP Site. Project Objectives The objectives of the Project include:  Establish the existing Delivery Station as a legal conforming use.  Establish new off-site parking for the Delivery Station to allow existing operations to continue.  Facilitate Amazon deliveries to the greater South San Francisco area.  Retain the existing operations on a property that is planned and zoned for industrial uses and that has access to existing infrastructure.  Retain the existing operations adjacent to similar logistics, warehouse, and distribution facilities.  Limit impacts, including from delivery trucks, on residential areas within the City and neighboring jurisdictions.  Provide economic benefits to the City through continued capital investment and employment opportunities. Requested Entitlements The entitlements and approvals requested for the Project include:  A Conditional Use Permit to establish the Delivery Station as a legal, conforming use.  A Conditional Use Permit to authorize an alternative parking plan for the Delivery Station, including the use of 130 off-site parking spaces at the OSP Site.  Parking Agreement for the proposed off-site parking.  Any other approvals required to implement the Project. 36 COMPANY: NAME - EMAIL - PHONE - AMAZON CORPORATE, LLC Zach Marchitto marchiz@amazon.com (253) 278-2538 CLIENT COMPANY - ADDRESS - REPRESENTATIVE: NAME - EMAIL - PHONE - NELSON 1416 NW 46th St. Suite 105-138 Seattle, WA 98107 KIRSTEN JONES KJONES@NELSONWW.COM (206) 408-8515 ARCHITECTURE COMPANY - ADDRESS - REPRESENTATIVE: NAME - EMAIL - PHONE - CIVIL ENGINEERING COMPANY - ADDRESS - REPRESENTATIVE: NAME - EMAIL - PHONE - OWNER PROLOGIS 3353 GATEWAY BLVD FREMONT, CA TRAVIS DURFEE N/A (775) 229-5470 KIMLEY-HORN 401 B St. Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92101 BARBARA PEREZ BARBARA.PEREZ@KIMLEY-HORN.COM (619) 744-0192 PROJECT LOCATION MAP FROM: GOOGLE MAPS COVER SHEET. 250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 SHEET INDEX. NUM TITLE G0.1 COVER SHEET. 01- GENERAL: 1 1 OF 2 SITE PLAN 2 OF 2 LANDSCAPE 02 - CIVIL: 2 A0.1 FLOOR PLAN A0.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A0.3 SITE PHOTOS 03 - ARCHITECTURAL: 3 Grand total: 6 DSF5 - CUP PACKAGE 250 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 22.0001795.000 PROJECT DIRECTORY APPLICABLE CODES BUILDING CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE MECHANICAL CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE PLUMBING CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIAPLUMBING CODE FIRE CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE ACCESSIBILITY CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE: SECTION 11B ENERGY CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE CONSERVATION CODE: 2022 CALGREEN CODE ELECTRICAL CODE: 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS EXISTING USE: WAREHOUSE STORAGE (NO CHANGE IN USE) MIXED OCCUPANCIES PRIMARY OCCUPANCY GROUP: S-1 MODERATE-HAZARD STORAGE S-2 LOW-HAZARD STORAGE B BUSINESS ACCESSORY OCCUPANCY GROUP: A-2 ASSEMBLY BUILDING AREA TOTAL BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE: 301,900 SF TENNANT SPACE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE: 118,125 SF NUMBER OF LEVELS: 1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE: II-B FIRE SPRINKLERED: YES ZONING INFO ZONING: AE LAND USE CODE: WAREHOUSE LAND USE DESCRIPTION: BUSINESS PARK - INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL ID: 015155050 & 015155060 TRAVEL DISTANCE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE: B 300' MAX MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE: S-1 400' MAX MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE: S-2 400' MAX DEFERRED SUBMITTALS FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS SITE ADDRESS: 250 UTAH AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 ZONING CLASSIFICATION: INDUSTRIAL COMERCIAL SCOPE OF WORK: • NO WORK IS PROPOSED, ALL IS TO REMAIN PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT / CODE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP G0.1 1 SHEET OF 6 37 SEWER C O PROP SI G N ICV ICV ICV 9109989 108 9 910 9 8910UTA H A V E LITTLEFIELD AVEEX. PRE-FABRICATED STEEL RAMP FOR VAN ENTRY INTO BUILDING EX. DOCK DOOR EX. ASSOCIATE PARKING LINE HAUL ENTRY/EXIT LINE HAUL EXIT ASSOCIATE AND VAN ENTRY/EXIT PROPERTY LINE EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE EX. VAN PROBLEM SOLVE SPACE (40') (51') DOUBLE DOOR ASSOCIATE ENTRANCE (45')(18') EX. 6' SIDEWALK EX. SIGN EX. SIGN EX. SIGN EX. SIGN EX. SIGN EX. SIGN EX. BOLLARDS (TYP.)25' SETBACK25' SE T B A C K25' SETBACKEXISTING BUILDING 250 UTAH AVENUE APN: 015-155-050 302,238 SF EX. ENTRANCE EX. ENTRANCE ADA PATH OF TRAVEL (TYP.) ADA PATH OF TRAVEL (TYP.) (18') TYP.(9')TYP.ADA PATH OF TRAVEL (TYP.) (27') (18') TYP.(9')TYP.(18')TYP.(9') TYP.(9')TYP.(18') TYP.(25')ADA PATH OF TRAVEL (TYP.) EX. ENTRANCE (60') TYP.(12')TYP.EX. ASSOCIATE PARKING EX. ASSOCIATE PARKING EX. TRUCK PARKING EX. ASSOCIATE PARKING(18')TYP.(9') TYP. (48') TYP.(3')TYP.(9')TYP.EX. BOX TRUCK AREA PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE (40') NORT H 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 50 25 50 100 Steering Angle Lock to Lock Time Articulating Angle WB-67 Trailer Track Tractor Track Trailer Width Tractor Width 19.504.00 feet 8.50 8.50: 8.00 8.00 : : : 0.00 3.00 45.50 15.00 53.00 : : :6.0 28.4 75.0 SITE CONCEPT250 A UTAH AVE©FOR REVIEWNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY DSF5 - LNOOF 1 NORT H 1 TRUCK SPECIFICATION: NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN, BEING PRELIMINARY IN NATURE, DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING ISSUES, NOR STORM DRAINAGE, GRADING, UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND THE LIKE ARE PROPERLY ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. 2.THIS CONCEPT WAS PREPARED STRICTLY BASED UPON THE INFORMATION REFERENCED ABOVE AND A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE MUNICIPAL ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. 3.THE FEASIBILITY OF SECURING THE REQUISITE LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CANNOT BE ASSESSED AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE PRELIMINARY NATURE OF THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETAILED ZONING ANALYSIS AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON THE COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE EFFORTS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEETING WITH THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Rivian Van 6.0 9.75 9.75 Steering Angle 34.3: 15.502.83 25.29 PROJECT SCOPE: NO PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS PART OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN OFF-SITE PARKING LOT.CA HIGHWAY 101S AIRPORT BLVDCOREYWAYWATTISWAYCOLMA CREEKLITTLEFIELD AVE LITTLEFIELD AVEUTAH AVE LAW R E N C E A V E HARBOR WAYBEACO N STREE T VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT SITE LOT COVERAGE: SITE AREA: 395,366 SF BUILDING AREA: 302,238 SF (76% OF SITE AREA) 38 Nelco Architecture, Inc.1200 5TH AVE. #1300SEATTLE, WA 98101Phone: (206) 408-8500WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMCONSULTANTARCHITECTISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager:Reviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:COVID-19 NOTICE:SOME GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY OWNER/OCCUPANT, HASBEEN INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS. NOT ALLSPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING OR SITE HAVE BEENREDESIGNED WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES INMIND. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THESE PLANS DO NOTCONSIDER ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES WHICHOWNER/OCCUPANT MAY DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TOCOVID-19, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOCIALDISTANCE, INDOOR AIR QUALITY, AIR VENT LOCATIONS,AND USE AND QUALITY OF PERSONAL PROTECTIONEQUIPMENT. NELSON MAKES NO GUARANTEES ORWARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THEEFFECTIVE ABILITY OF THESE PLANS TO PREVENT ONSETOF COVID-19.PROJECT NAMECLIENT@2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.401 B STREET, STE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101619-234-9411www.kimley-horn.comENGINEER DATEBPJCBP9/6/2023PLANSET DATE: 9/6/2023BPNORTHXXLANDSCAPE AREASPERVIOUS52,252 SF (13%)IMPERVIOUS343,114 SF (87%)TOTAL SITE:395,366 SFEXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN)790GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET40 204080LANDSCAPEPLANL1.0LEGENDEX. PROPERTY LINE / ROWEXISTING FENCEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CONCRETEEXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAEXISTING TREE TO REMAINEXISTING SHRUB/PLANT TO REMAINXXXXSEWER COPROP SIGNICVICVICV9 1099891089910 98 9 10 UTAH AVEEXISTING BUILDING250 UTAH AVENUEAPN: 015-155-050EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING SHRUBS(TYP.)EXISTING SHRUBS(TYP.)PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE25' SETBACK 25' SETBACK25' SETBACK 39 EXISTING RAMP (DOWN)1183201764A3AAA A AA AAMOVE JACKMOVE DOORFLIP ALL4AA289' - 1"CONFERENCE ROOM6EXISTING RAMP (DOWN)TENANT SPACEPROJECT AREAADJACENT TENANTS, NOT IN SCOPE3(N) CONTRSUCTION (E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN(EXISTING: GRAY LINES)(NEW: BLACK LINES)NOTES:1. NO DEMOLITION PROPOSED(E) CONTRSUCTION TO BE REMOVED(E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAINDOOR TYPE TAGxxx(EXISTING: GRAY LINES)(DEMO: RED LINES)Nelco Architecture, Inc.1200 Fifth Ave., Suite 1300Seattle, WA. 98101Phone: (206) 408-8500WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMCONSULTANTARCHITECTPROJECT NAMEISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager:Reviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:COVID-19 NOTICE:SOME GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY OWNER/OCCUPANT, HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS. NOT ALL SPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING OR SITE HAVE BEEN REDESIGNED WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES IN MIND. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THESE PLANS DO NOT CONSIDER ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES WHICH OWNER/OCCUPANT MAY DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOCIAL DISTANCE, INDOOR AIR QUALITY, AIR VENT LOCATIONS, AND USE AND QUALITY OF PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. NELSON MAKES NO GUARANTEES OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE EFFECTIVE ABILITY OF THESE PLANS TO PREVENT ONSET OF COVID-19.U:\Proj\Amazon\CA\24.0000588.000-DSF5 - R4 South San Francisco, CA\DRAWINGS\MODELS-3D\DSF5 Ph2 - ARCH .rvt5/20/2024 2:36:28 PMA0.00SITE PLAN250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA94080CheckerApproverAuthor22.0001795.000DSF5 - TENANTIMPROVEMENTSI.F.P.CheckerDSF5 -TENANTIMPROVEMENTSDESCRIPTION ∆ DATE1" = 40'-0"1EXISTING SITE PLAN (FOR REFERENCEONLY)LEGENDS - EXISTING & PROPOSEDLEGENDS - EXISTING & DEMOLITIONSITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT SITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT SITE ENTRY TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLY COMPLIANT 40 202092192821933 20209202092020920209 22867WINTER SUPPLIES TRASH SHRED BIN4A3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT DOCK P L A T E DOCK PL A T E TEAM LI F T TRASH TRASH 6AFILE CABINET KEEP THIS SIDE CLEARKEEP THIS SIDECLEAR STEP STO O L 6A 4A G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " PALET J ACK HAND TRUCKSINGLE O V E R F L O W TABLE BACK OF VANCARTCART CONES FRONT OF VAN FILE CABINET TRASH TRASH POTS 4A6A1FILE CABINET CCTV DISPLAYGEMBA BOARD 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO M A T TRASH 3'x5' W / D B L . S T CK . T AP E E R G O M A T ERGO MAT 4A WHITE BOA R D GEMBA BOARD ICE CLEATS 1 6A EYE WASH STAT I O N CART AMBASSADO R BOARD 5'- 0" 7'- 0 " 8'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 8'- 0 " 9'- 0" TRASH 3A PPE VEN D I N G M A C H I N E TRASH 4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOO R M AT TRASH 6A GEMBA BOARD FILE CABINET PAPER PAPER CHEMICALS CHEMICALS TRASH 24" x36" DRAI N M AT 4A-GFI20A-GFI WATER 17"x 24" FLOOR MAT6 ft clearance for pallet jack movement5S TAPEEXCESS SIGNAGEHEAT STRESS MISCMISCMISCMISC TRASH4A COVID SUPPLIES COVID SUPPLIES COVID SUPPLIES BAG RETU R N BAG RET U RN BAG RE T U R N BAG RETUR N BAG RETU R N BAG RETU R N VRI CART TRASH4A4AHOURLY HUDDLE CART SORT BAGS SORT BAGS SORT BAGS SORT BAGS SORT BAGS CONE PALLET JACK PALLET J A C K CONE PALLET J A C K CONE AKIOSK DISPLAY TRASH 4AG o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " VOD BOARD GEM BA BOARD PROBLEM S O L VE NON-OV RTS OV RTS PAPER/CA R D BO A RD RECY C L I NG PLASTI C R EC Y C L IN G CONE CONE CONE CONE WHITE BOARD WHITE BOARD 3'x5' W / D B L . S T C K . T A P E E R G O M A T ERGO MATTRASH3AFILE CABI N E T AADEVICE C H A R G I N G S T A TI O N TOP FIVE 10'- 0"10'- 0"10'- 0 " 3'- 0 " 10'- 0" 10'- 0"10'- 0"10'- 0" 3'- 0 " STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 1 TRASH4A TRASH 4A-GFI WATER 17"x24" FL O O R M A TTRASH4A-GFI WATER17"x24" F L O O R M A T SORTA B L E NON SOR T RETURN T O S O R T C E N T E R TRASH 4A-GFI WATER 17"x24" FLOOR MAT TRASH4A TOOLSWORKBENCH 2 6A 4A 6A VIDMAR-KEEPSTOCKSHOP VAC STORAGE CABINETSTORAGE CABINETEYE WASH STATIO N CART LIQ FLAM CABINETLADDER 10'- 0"10'- 0"7'- 6 " 7'- 6 " 2'- 6 "3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT 10'- 0" 10'- 0"10'- 0"10'- 0" TRASH TRASH WATER TRASH 4A-GFI WATER 17"x 24" FLOOR MAT SCISSOR LIFT STORAGE 12A TRASH3AFILE CABIN E T AADEVICE C H AR G I N G S T A T I O N TRASH3AFILE CABINE T AADEVICE CHA R G I NG S T AT I O N TRASH3AFILE CA B I N E T A ADEVICE CH A R G IN G S TA T I O N TRASH3AFILE CABI N E T AADEVICE C H A R G I N G S T A TI O NTRASH3AFILE CABIN E T AADEVICE C H AR G I N G S T A T I O NTRASH3AFILE CABINE T AADEVICE CHA R G I NG S T AT I O NAA AA A AA A FASTSTART FASTSTA R T 3A 3A TV TV WORKING W ELL TRASH3A PPE VE N D I N G M A C H I N E A MERCURY D I S P L A Y 3AA A A AA A FASTSTART FASTSTAR T A INDUCT L A B E L P R I N T E R S 4ACARTS 4ACARTS VIDMAR-K E E P S T O C K LADDER LIFT CRANE STORAG E C ABI N E TS 7'- 6"7'- 6" 2'- 6" 10'- 0 " 10'- 0 " 10'- 0 " 10'- 0 " 10'- 0 " 10'- 0 "TRASH3AFILE CA B I N E T A ADEVICE CH A R G IN G S TA T I O N FILE CA B I N ET TDR CART TRASH ROTATE D E SK + C AG E MOVE DE S K + CA G E MOVE C AG E MOVE JA C K MOVE DO ORFLIP ALL FLIP DESK + C AG E FLIP DESK + CAGE ERGO M A T 4A4AAPULLCORDPULLCORDPULLCORDPULLCORDUNISTRUT 12' AFF UNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFF P1D1D1SP3P2300301303304302A302B302C305400CC166 162 TOTAL CARTSMCP #1S101S102S103S104S105S106S106S108S107S109S111S113S115S117S119S121S123S125S126S110S112S114S116S118S120S122S124COMPRESSEDAIR SYSTEMJACKPOTHAMPERTRASH 2'x3' ER G O M A T 2'x2' ERGO MAT CART DIVERTERPROBLEM SOLVESIDELINE 2'x2' ERGO MAT ERGO M AT TRASH 2'x3' ERG O MA T 2'x2' ERGO MAT CART DIVERTERPROBLEM SOLVESIDELINE 2'x2' ERGO MAT ERGO M AT NO STAN D ZONE NO STAND ZONENO STA ND ZO NE30ATWISTLOCK+0FT 11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLR11'6"CLRPROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE GO CART STAGING GO CART STAGING G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" GO CART STAGING GO CART STAGING G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54"G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54"G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54"G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54"G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54"INBOUND WIP60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGE CO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL.CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL.CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E CART CART CART CARTCARTCARTCART CART 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 3'-8" TYP.CARTCART JAMPOLE 3'x5' W / D B L . S T C K . T A P E E R G O M A T JAMPOLE 3'x5' W / D B L . S T C K . T A P E E R G O M A T 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL.CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. CONV. EDGECO NV. EDG E 44" ROWS60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL.HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL.HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL. HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKSCONV. CL.CO NV. CL.HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E 60" OV RACKS CONV. CL.CO NV. CL.HAMPER EDGE HAM PER EDG E PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE 30ATWISTLOCK+0FT TRASH 2'x3' ERG O MA T 2'x2' ERGO MAT CART DIVERTERPROBLEM SOLVESIDELINE 2'x2' ERGO MAT ERGO M AT30ATWISTLOCK+0FT GO CART STAGING GO CART STAGINGG o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" TRASH 2'x3' ER GO M A T 2'x2' ERGO MAT CART DIVERTERPROBLEM SOLVESIDELINE 2'x2' ERGO MAT ERGO M AT 30ATWISTLOCK+0FT GO CART STAGING GO CART STAGING G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" TRASH 2'x3' ERG O M A T 2'x2' ERGO MAT CART DIVERTERPROBLEM SOLVESIDELINE 2'x2' ERGO MAT ERGO M AT 30ATWISTLOCK+0FT GO CART STAGING GO CART STAGINGG o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" G o Cart3 2.5" x 54" PROBLEM S O L VE PROBLEM S O L V E PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM SOLVE134'-6" SORTER OALAISLES ARE EXISTING ON SITEPROVIDED BY OTHERSLOCATIONS VARY BY SITEDOES NOTINCLUDEGAURDIN G10,15, OR 20HP208-230/460VAC (MULTI-RANGEVOLTAGE)170 FPM @ 60HZVFD REQUIRED BY OTHERSMOTOR CONTROLSBY OTHERSEND OF SENSORALL CHUTES BY OTHERSALL CHUTES BY OTHERSALL CHUTES BY OTHERSALL CHUTES BY OTHERSSUPPORTS PROVIDED@48 + /- TOB HEIGHTDISTANCE FROM SORTER INFE ED TO FIRSTCHUTE M AY VAR Y BASED ON UP STREAM LAYOUT PER FINGERRELATIVE POSITION OF SORTER TO CHUTEAFFECTS P ACKAGE DESTINATI ON WITHI N FIRST HALF OF FIR ST CHUTE.POWER PANELREQUIRES 120VAC/20AMP FEED PLC PANELWITH HMI ENCODER POWERED ROLL ER TRANSFER CONTROL LED BY OTHERS INTRALOX SENSOR ARRAY BRIDGE APPROX. L OCATION33" BELT WIDTHMIN. HAMPER/CHUTE START POINTMAX. HAMP E R /C H U TE E ND P O I N T MAX. HAM P E R / C HU T E EN D P O I NT STOP 42" 84" 54" 36" 60" 54" 48"UPUP PCCCCCCPCPCCCCCCPCC CCPCPCCCCCCPCCCGPC PC PC PC PC 30A0'30A-5'30A+1'30A0'30A-5'30A0'30A0'30A0'STOP B STOP 28" 28"A1.051A0.22A1.052A B C D E F G H C.5 F.5 1 2 3 4 5 69101112131415161718192021 LOCKER RM 1 TRAINING RM 2 STATION MNG. 3 VESTIBULE 4 STORAGE 6 OPT. OFFICE 7 OPEN OFFICE 8 MEN'S EXIST 9 BREAK RM 10 MOTHER'S RM 11 CONTEMPLATION ROOM 12 JANITOR'S CLT 13 H.R. OFFICE 14 ELEC. ROOM 15 WOMEN'S EXIST. 16 WAREHOUSE I 17 VESTIBULE 18 WAREHOUSE II 19 CONF. RM 21 . 459' - 7"290' - 0"A0.213 199' - 0"199' - 1" FLOOR PLAN 250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 1" = 40'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN A0.1 3 SHEET OF 6 41 1 2 3 4 5 69101112131415161718192021 ABCDEFGHC.5F.5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 1" = 30'-0"1 EXT. WEST SIDE ELEVATION 1" = 30'-0"2 EXT. NORTH SIDE ELEVATION A0.2 4 SHEET OF 6 42 SITE PHOTOS 250 UTAH AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 A0.3 6 SHEET OF 6 PHOTO: WEST ELEVATION PHOTO: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO: EAST ELEVATION 43 PROJECT / CODE INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION: APPLICABLE CODES: BUILDING CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS MECHANICAL CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS PLUMBING CODE:2022 CALIFORNIAPLUMBING CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS FIRE CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS ACCESSIBILITY CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE: SECTION 11B & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS ENERGY CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS CONSERVATION CODE:2022 CALGREEN CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS ELECTRICAL CODE:2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE & JURISDICTIONAL AMENDMENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PROJECT ADDRESS: DFA5 AMAZON S. SAN FRANCISCO 400 -438 LITTLEFIELD AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA. 94080 PROJECT DIRECTORY: LANDLORD: STARK INVESTMENT COMPANY LP CHARLES KLINE MGT. INC. 151 CALLAN AVE. STE 213 SAN LEANDRO CA. 94577 CONTACT: CHARLES KLINE 510-895-8110 ARCHITECT: NELSON WORLDWIDE 1416 NW 46TH ST. SUITE 105-138 SEATTLE, WA 98107 CONTACT: KIRSTEN JONES (206) 408-8515 CIVIL ENGINEER: KIMLEY-HORN 401 B St. SUITE 600 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 CONTACT: BARBARA PEREZ BARBARA.PEREZ@KIMLEY-HORN.COM 619-744-0192 CLIENT: AMAZON CORPORATE, LLC CONTACT: ZACH MARCHITTO MARCHIZ@AMAZON.COM (253) 278-2538 BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: TENANT OCCUPANCY:S-1, MODERATE-HAZARD STORAGE (PRIMARY)SECTION 311.2 B, BUSINESS (ACCESSORY)SECTION 304.1 A-3, ASSEMBLY (ACCESSORY)SECTION 303.1 NUMBER OF LEVELS:1 PROPOSED USE:FREIGHT / TRUCK TERMINALS AND WAREHOUSE STORAGE (NO CHANGE IN USE) TOTAL LOT AREA:APPROX. 226,960 SQ. FT. LEASE AREA:166,640 SQ. FT. OCCUPANT LOAD:429 OCCUPANTS OFFICE (B)700 SQ. FT. / 100 = 7 RESTROOMS/JANITORS (ACCESSORY TO B)438 SQ. FT. / 0 = 0 WAREHOUSE (S-1) 163,910 SQ. FT. / 500 = 328 BREAK ROOM (A-3) 1,170 SQ. FT. / 15 = 78 LOCKER RM (ACCESSORY TO B)166 SQ. FT. / 50 = 3 OPEN WORKROOM (ACCESSORY TO B)256 SQ. FT. / 20 = 13 EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: OFFICE (B)2 REQUIRED, 2 PROVIDED WAREHOUSE (S-1)7 REQUIRED, 7 PROVIDED BREAK ROOM (A-3)2 REQUIRED, 2 PROVIDED REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH: OFFICE 0.2 X 23 = 5" (72" PROVIDED) WAREHOUSE 0.2 X 328 = 66" (252" PROVIDED) BREAK ROOM 0.2 X 78 = 16" (72" PROVIDED) SPRINKLED: YES, FULLY SPRINKLED ESFR SYSTEM FIRE ALARM: YES CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-B ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE -TABLE 1017.2 WAREHOUSE: 250'-0" : 400'-0" WITH ESFR SPRINKLER SYSTEM BUSINESS: 300'-0" PROJECT INFORMATION: VICINITY MAP: PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 -438 LITTLEFIELD AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA. 94080 ZONING CLASSIFICATION: MIX INDUSTRIAL (MI) ZONE SCOPE OF WORK: NO WORK IS PROPOSED, ALL IS TO REMAIN DFA5 -CUP PERMIT 09/28/23 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 COVER SHEET SHEET INDEX NUMBER NAME 01 - GENERAL G-00 COVER SHEET 02 - CIVIL 1 OF 2 SITE CONCEPT 2 OF 2 LANDSCAPE PLANS 03 - ARCHITECTURAL A-01 CUP FLOOR PLAN A-02 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-03 PHOTO SURVEY Grand total: 6 G-OO SHEET 1 OF 6 44 SITE CONCEPT400 LITTLEFIELD AVE©FOR REVIEWNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY DFA5OF 2 SITE Steering Angle Lock to Lock Time Articulating Angle WB-67 Trailer Track Tractor Track Trailer Width Tractor Width 19.504.00 feet 8.50 8.50: 8.00 8.00 : : : 0.00 3.00 45.50 15.00 53.00 : : :6.0 28.4 75.0 NORTH NORTH 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 30 15 30 60 E G R A N D A V E LITTLEFIELDAVEFORBESSWIFT AVE TRUCK SPECIFICATION: NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN, BEING PRELIMINARY IN NATURE, DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING ISSUES, NOR STORM DRAINAGE, GRADING, UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND THE LIKE ARE PROPERLY ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. 2.THIS CONCEPT WAS PREPARED STRICTLY BASED UPON THE INFORMATION REFERENCED ABOVE AND A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE MUNICIPAL ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. 3.THE FEASIBILITY OF SECURING THE REQUISITE LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CANNOT BE ASSESSED AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE PRELIMINARY NATURE OF THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETAILED ZONING ANALYSIS AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON THE COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE EFFORTS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEETING WITH THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Rivian Van 6.0 9.75 9.75 Steering Angle 34.3: 15.502.83 25.29 PROJECT SCOPE: NO PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS PART OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN OFF-SITE PARKING LOT. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LOT COVERAGE: SITE AREA: 348,483 SF BUILDING AREA: 166,891 SF (48% OF SITE AREA) 1BLVDHARBOR WAYUTAH AVE DNAWAY GATEWAYBLVDALLERTON AVESLO PEWMGAS Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Arma d a V a n 24' x 8 '1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Arma d a V a n 24' x 8 '1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armad a V a n 24' x 8 '1160Arma d a V a n 24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8'1160Armada Van24' x 8 '1160Armada Van24' x 8'Armad a V a n 24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8 'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van 24' x 8'Arma d a Van24' x 8 'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Arma d a V a n 24' x 8 'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armad a V a n 24' x 8 'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'CLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCARPOOL/VANPOOLDROP-OFFCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVVANACCESSIBLE/EVCSSTANDARDACCESSIBLE/EVCSCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLEXISTING BUILDING 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE APN: 015-133-220 166,606 SF (65')TYP.(12') TYP.(27')TYP.(11') TYP. (27') TYP.(11')TYP.(20') TYP.(9')TYP.(20')TYP.(9') TYP.(30')(26')(26')(30')(30')(30')(80')(28')50' SETBACK 32' SETBACK 9' SETBACK10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING VAN PARKING EXISTING TRUCK DOCKS EXISTING VAN PARKING EXISTING ASSOCIATE ENTRANCE ADA PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING DOCK DOORS EXISTING ASSOCIATE PARKING EXISTING TRUCK ENTRANCE EXISTING ASSOCIATE ENTRANCE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING BIKE PARKING N89°00'31"W 628.99'N0°59'29"E346.22'N0°58'33"E346.22'N89°00'31"W 629.14'LITTLEFIELD AVENUEEXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING VAN ENTRANCE/EXIT EXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING STRUCTURAL COLUMNS (TYP.) EXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING VAN ENTRANCE EXISTING VAN EXIT 45 Nelco Architecture, Inc.1200 5TH AVE. #1300SEATTLE, WA 98101Phone: (206) 408-8500WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMCONSULTANTARCHITECTISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager:Reviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:COVID-19 NOTICE:SOME GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY OWNER/OCCUPANT, HASBEEN INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS. NOT ALLSPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING OR SITE HAVE BEENREDESIGNED WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES INMIND. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THESE PLANS DO NOTCONSIDER ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES WHICHOWNER/OCCUPANT MAY DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TOCOVID-19, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOCIALDISTANCE, INDOOR AIR QUALITY, AIR VENT LOCATIONS,AND USE AND QUALITY OF PERSONAL PROTECTIONEQUIPMENT. NELSON MAKES NO GUARANTEES ORWARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THEEFFECTIVE ABILITY OF THESE PLANS TO PREVENT ONSETOF COVID-19.PROJECT NAMECLIENT@2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.401 B STREET, STE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101619-234-9411www.kimley-horn.comENGINEER DATEBPNABP10/31/2023PLANSET DATE: 10/31/2023BPLANDSCAPE AREASPERVIOUS38,469 SF (11%)IMPERVIOUS309,964 SF (89%)TOTAL SITE:348,483 SFEXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN)89NORTH0GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET30 153060LEGENDEX. PROPERTY LINE / ROWSETBACK LINEEXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAINEXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA TO REMAINEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN(CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES)EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN(KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA)EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN(PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR)EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN(CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA)LANDSCAPE PLANS400 LITTLEFIELD AVESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 940802 OF 2SLOPEWMGASArmada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' 1160 Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8' Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'Armada Van24' x 8'CLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCARPOOL/VANPOOLDROP-OFFCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVVANACCESSIBLE/EVCSSTANDARDACCESSIBLE/EVCSCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLCLEANAIR/VANPOOLEXISTING BUILDING400 LITTLEFIELDAVENUEAPN: 015-133-220166,606 SFN89°00'31"W628.99'N0°59'29"E 346.22' N0°58'33"E 346.22'N89°00'31"W629.14'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINELITTLEFIELD AVENUE EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)EXISTING TREES(TYP.)50' SETBACK32' SETBACK9' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 46 2 A-02 4 A-02 3 A-02 1 A-02 AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH JJ KK LL MM NN PP QQ RR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 317' - 9"392' - 9" DFA5 -CUP PERMIT 09/28/23 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 CUP FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/64" = 1'-0" A-01 SHEET 4 OF 6 47 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 544'-3" 426 A B24'-2"13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 6 4 3 2 1 426 544'-3"24'-2"1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 319'-8 1/2"24'-2"3'-2"R Q P N M L K J H G F E D C B A 320'-0"24'-8"A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R DFA5 -CUP PERMIT 09/28/23 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-02 SHEET 5 OF 6 NOT TO SCALEA-02 1 NORTH ELEVATION (RIGHT SIDE) NOT TO SCALEA-02 2 SOUTH ELEVATION (LEFT SIDE) NOT TO SCALEA-02 3 EAST ELEVATION (REAR) NOT TO SCALEA-02 4 WEST ELEVATION (FRONT) 48 DFA5 -CUP PERMIT 09/28/23 400 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 PHOTO SURVEY A-03 SHEET 6 OF 6 PHOTO: 1 PHOTO: 2 PHOTO: 3 PHOTO: 4 PHOTO: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO: EAST ELEVATION PHOTO: WEST ELEVATION PHOTO: 1 PHOTO: 2 PHOTO: 3PHOTO: 4 49 SITE CONCEPT501 S AIRPORT BLVD©FOR REVIEWNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY DSF5/DFA5 - OSPOF 3 Steering Angle Lock to Lock Time Articulating Angle WB-67 Trailer Track Tractor Track Trailer Width Tractor Width 19.504.00 feet 8.50 8.50: 8.00 8.00 : : : 0.00 3.00 45.50 15.00 53.00 : : :6.0 28.4 75.0 NORT H NORTH 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 40 20 40 80 TRUCK SPECIFICATION: NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN, BEING PRELIMINARY IN NATURE, DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING ISSUES, NOR STORM DRAINAGE, GRADING, UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND THE LIKE ARE PROPERLY ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. 2.THIS CONCEPT WAS PREPARED STRICTLY BASED UPON THE INFORMATION REFERENCED ABOVE AND A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE MUNICIPAL ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. 3.THE FEASIBILITY OF SECURING THE REQUISITE LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CANNOT BE ASSESSED AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE PRELIMINARY NATURE OF THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETAILED ZONING ANALYSIS AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON THE COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE EFFORTS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEETING WITH THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Rivian Van 6.0 9.75 9.75 Steering Angle 34.3: 15.502.83 25.29 PROJECT SCOPE: NO PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS PART OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN OFF-SITE PARKING LOT. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT SITE EXISTING1 SITE INFORMATION: SITE AREA 207,845 SF BUILDING AREA 27,754 SF (13%)XXX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX X X X±(32') 20'SETB A C K PROPERTY LINE ENTRY/EXIT S AIRPORT BLVDBEACON S T EXISTING BUILDING 501 S AIRPORT BLVD APN: 015-173-150 23,754SF 8.0' TYP.10.0' SETBACK16.0'9.0 ' 8.0'16.0'21.5'16.0'23.8'24.0'8.0'16.0'16.0'21.6'15.0' 16.0'23.0' 8.0'16.0'8.0'8.0'42.0'EX. LIGHT POLE EX. UTILITY POLE EX. ENTRANCE 16.0'16.0'9.0'15.0'15.0' ADA PATH OF TRAVEL 16.0'14.0'9.0'21.2'EX. ENTRANCE EX. ENTRANCE EX. LIGHT POLE EX. LIGHT POLE EX. CANOPY EX. CANOPY N ACCESS R D EX. RAMP S A IRPORT BLVD BEACON ST BELLE AIR RD MARC O W A Y SAN B R U N O C A N A L COLM A C R E E K SAFE HARBOR SHELTER 1 0 1 SHAW RD SAN MATEO AVESAM TRANS NN FIELD RD N ACCESS RDLOWRIE AVE50 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX20'SETBACKPROPERTY LINES AIRPORT BLVDBEACON STEXISTING BUILDING501 S AIRPORT BLVDAPN: 015-173-15023,754SF10.0' SETBACK EX. SHRUBS (TYP)EX. TREES (TYP)EX. SHRUBS (TYP)EX. TREES (TYP)N ACCESS RDNelco Architecture, Inc.1200 5TH AVE. #1300SEATTLE, WA 98101Phone: (206) 408-8500WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMCONSULTANTARCHITECTISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager:Reviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:COVID-19 NOTICE:SOME GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY OWNER/OCCUPANT, HASBEEN INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS. NOT ALLSPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING OR SITE HAVE BEENREDESIGNED WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES INMIND. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THESE PLANS DO NOTCONSIDER ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES WHICHOWNER/OCCUPANT MAY DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TOCOVID-19, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOCIALDISTANCE, INDOOR AIR QUALITY, AIR VENT LOCATIONS,AND USE AND QUALITY OF PERSONAL PROTECTIONEQUIPMENT. NELSON MAKES NO GUARANTEES ORWARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THEEFFECTIVE ABILITY OF THESE PLANS TO PREVENT ONSETOF COVID-19.PROJECT NAMECLIENT@2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.401 B STREET, STE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101619-234-9411www.kimley-horn.comENGINEER DATEBPJCBP11/1/2023PLANSET DATE: 11/1/2023BPNORTH0GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET30 153060XXLANDSCAPE AREASPERVIOUS16,814 SF (8%)IMPERVIOUS191,031 SF (92%)TOTAL SITE:207,845 SFEXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN)24LEGENDEX. PROPERTY LINE / ROWEXISTING SETBACKEXISTING FENCEEXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAINEXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA TO REMAINEXISTING TREE TO REMAINEXISTING SHRUB/PLANT TO REMAINLANDSCAPEINVENTORYPLANL1.0SHEET 2 OF 351 SITE CONCEPT501 S AIRPORT BLVD©FOR REVIEWNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY DSF5/DFA5 - OSPOF 3 NORTH 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 40 20 40 80 Steering Angle Lock to Lock Time Articulating Angle WB-67 Trailer Track Tractor Track Trailer Width Tractor Width 19.504.00 feet 8.50 8.50: 8.00 8.00 : : : 0.00 3.00 45.50 15.00 53.00 : : :6.0 28.4 75.0 NORT H SITE AREA 207,845 SF BUILDING AREA 27,754 SF (13%) EXISTING PARKING SPACES 424 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE 20,785 SF (10%) PROPOSED LANDSCAPE 23,917 TRUCK SPECIFICATION: NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN, BEING PRELIMINARY IN NATURE, DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING ISSUES, NOR STORM DRAINAGE, GRADING, UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND THE LIKE ARE PROPERLY ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. 2.THIS CONCEPT WAS PREPARED STRICTLY BASED UPON THE INFORMATION REFERENCED ABOVE AND A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE MUNICIPAL ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. 3.THE FEASIBILITY OF SECURING THE REQUISITE LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CANNOT BE ASSESSED AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE PRELIMINARY NATURE OF THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETAILED ZONING ANALYSIS AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON THE COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE EFFORTS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEETING WITH THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Rivian Van 6.0 9.75 9.75 Steering Angle 34.3: 15.502.83 25.29 PROJECT SCOPE: NO PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS PART OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN OFF-SITE PARKING LOT. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT SITE SITE INFORMATION:PROPOSED3S A IRPORT BLVD BEACON ST BELLE AIR RD MARC O W A Y SAN B R U N O C A N A L COLM A C R E E K SAFE HARBOR SHELTER 1 0 1 SHAW RD SAN MATEO AVESAM TRANS NN FIELD RD N ACCESS RDLOWRIE AVEXXX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX X X X±(32') 20'SETB A C K PROPERTY LINE ENTRY/EXIT S AIRPORT BLVDBEACON S T EXISTING BUILDING 501 S AIRPORT BLVD APN: 015-173-150 23,754SF 8.0' TYP.10.0' SETBACK8.0'16.0'21.5'16.0'23.8'24.0'8.0'16.0'16.0'21.6'15.0' 16.0'23.0' 8.0'16.0'8.0'8.0'42.0'EX. LIGHT POLE EX. UTILITY POLE EX. ENTRANCE 16.0'16.0'9.0'15.0'15.0' ADA PATH OF TRAVEL 16.0'14.0'9.0'21.2'EX. ENTRANCE EX. ENTRANCE EX. LIGHT POLE EX. LIGHT POLE EX. CANOPY EX. CANOPY N ACCESS R D 28.6' EX. RAMP NO LONGER IN USE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ISLAND (TYP.)24.4'52 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX3'-0" TALL LANDSCAPE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING3'-0" TALL LANDSCAPE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING3'-0" TALL LANDSCAPE SHRUBS FOR SCREENINGS AIRPORT BLVDBEACON STN ACCESS RDEXISTING BUILDING 501 S AIRPORT BLDV APN: 015-173-150(E) LIGHT POLE(E) LIGHT POLE(E) LIGHT POLE(E) LIGHT POLEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED LANDSCAPE ISLAND (TYP.)(E) CANOPY(E) RAMP NOLONGER IN USE(E) CANOPY(E) ENTRANCE(E) ENTRANCE(E) ENTRANCEADA PATH OF TRAVELSETBACK10' - 0"SETBACK20' - 0"ENTRY/ EXIT+/- 32' - 0"U.N.O.8' - 0" TYP. U.N.O.16' - 0" TYP.15' - 6"1" = 20'-0"AS-101ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1Nelco Architecture, Inc.PROJECT NAMEISSUES & REVISION LISTProject Manager: TPReviewed By:Approved By:Project No:Drawn By:SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT INFOTEAMProject Name:STAMPProject Status:CIVIL401 B StreetSuite 600San Diego, CA 92101Main: 619-234-9411DFA4_OSPARCHITECT6/3/2024 2:11:02 PMAS-101ARCHITECTURALSITE PLANDFS5_OSP501 S AIRPORT BLDVSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080CheckerApproverAuthor20XXX.XXPROGRESS1201 THIRD AVE.Suite 23-127Seattle, WA 98101WWW.NELSONWORLDWIDE.COMPhone: (206) 408-8501DESCRIPTION ∆ DATE3'-0" TALL LANDSCAPE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING3'-0" TALL LANDSCAPE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING53 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 May 15, 2024 Ms. Seema Adina Senior Entitlements Manager Amazon (transmitted via email) RE:Delivery Station DSF5 - Traffic Memorandum – South San Francisco, CA Dear Ms. Adina: Amazon has requested that a traffic analysis be completed for the Delivery Station DSF5 at 250 A Utah Avenue, South San Francisco, CA. The existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard (project) is proposed to serve as off-site parking for Delivery Service Provider (DSP) Personal Vehicles and delivery vans for DSF5. The traffic study will show no vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts and no adverse effects to the traffic operations in the surrounding area. This memorandum summarizes the methodology, analysis, and results of the anticipated traffic effects due to the project. Background EXISTING OPERATIONS Amazon has an existing delivery station in South San Francisco: DSF5 at 250 A Utah Avenue. This site currently utilizes one off-site parking lot located at 101 Terminal Court, South San Francisco, CA. That existing off-site parking lot has approximately 1,300 available parking spaces, but is only allocated 230 parking spaces. On average, only 126 parking spaces are used on a typical day for the DSF5 Station. The remaining spaces are either used by the existing DFA5 delivery station at 400 Littlefield Avenue in South San Francisco, or remain unoccupied. EXISTING SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES Amazon provided a schedule of vehicles entering and exiting the existing delivery station and the off- site parking lot. This schedule is provided in Attachment A and the majority of vehicles were planned to avoid the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. For the off-site parking lot, DSP Personal Vehicles would arrive at the off-site parking lot in 24-vehicle waves at 9:20 AM, 9:40 AM, 10:00 AM, and 10:20 AM, depart 30 minutes later in the delivery vans to DSF5, and depart from DSF5 in the delivery vans 20 minutes later. In the evenings, the delivery vans would return starting at 7:00 PM and ending at 9:00 PM. Off-site delivery vans are encouraged to return back to the station before going back to the off-site parking lot. It should be noted that these hours are well after the weekday PM peak period between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. After returning to the delivery station, vans return to the off-site parking lot, and then DSP Personal Vehicles would depart the off-site parking lot during the same 30-minute time period. The project vehicle trips for DSF5 are shown in Figure 1. This figure highlights the trips avoiding the typical weekday peak hours. Therefore, the existing peak hour traffic counts collected at study intersections would not include the DSF5 trips. 54 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1: DSF5 Vehicle Trips Generated by Time of Day 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 48 78 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 63 38 45 7 1 0 0 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00:0000:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:0022:3023:0023:30#ofTripsTime of Day Project Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak PM Peak Hours 55 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Traffic Analysis INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The intersection level of service (LOS) and queuing were reviewed at each of the four (4) study intersections using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology within Synchro software. Similar to other approved traffic studies, the City considers LOS A through LOS D to be acceptable levels of service. LOS E and LOS F are considered unacceptable levels of service. Baseline Volumes The baseline volumes are from the Genentech Master Plan Transportation Impact Assessment1 (Genentech TIA) prepared by Fehr and Peers and dated August 28, 2019. The existing volumes from this study are based on May 2016 volumes provided by the City and therefore represent pre-COVID conditions. It should be noted that no volumes were provided at Intersection #2, S Airport Boulevard and Project Driveway. Instead, the volumes for this intersection were determined by balancing with the volumes from the intersection to the south at S Airport Boulevard and N Access Road/I-380 on- ramp. The turning movements for this intersection were assumed to be 25 vehicles per hour. Existing baseline volumes are shown in Figure 2. Baseline Lane Geometry and Signal Timing The intersection lane geometries and signal timing parameters are based on the Synchro outputs from the Genentech TIA as well. Because the signal timing parameters are not explicitly stated in the Genentech TIA, Kimley-Horn made assumptions to best represent the existing signal timing inputs. The intersection LOS of each study intersection were compared to the existing condition results in the Genentech TIA and were determined to be consistent. EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS RESULTS Table 1 shows the existing LOS summary for each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that these existing LOS include the DSF5 operations, albeit the peak hour trips from the DSF5 operations are minimal because the DSF5 operations focus on non-peak hour operations. As shown, each intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. For Intersection #2, the parking lot driveway on S Airport Boulevard, the delays for the southbound left turn into the new proposed parking lot and for the westbound approach, which is the outbound movement for the proposed parking lot, are zero seconds since there are no volumes for these movements in the existing condition because the proposed parking lot is vacant. Analysis outputs are shown in Attachment C. 1 Genentech Master Plan Transportation Impact Assessment, Fehr and Peers, August 28, 2019. 56 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Table 1: Existing LOS Summary #Intersection Criteria Control Existing AM Peak PM Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay 1 S Airport Blvd/Utah Ave D Signal C 32.2 C 32.1 2 S Airport Blvd/Parking Lot Driveway D SSSC A 0.9 A 8.0 Southbound Left Turn1 A 0.0 A 0.0 Westbound Approach1 A 0.0 A 0.0 3 S Airport Blvd/N Access Rd/I-380 On-ramp D Signal B 16.7 C 27.4 4 S Airport Blvd/I-380 Off-ramp D Signal C 22.4 C 31.0 1The southbound left turn and westbound approach (project access) have zero vehicles in the existing condition. Results shown in bold indicate locations and time periods operating at a deficient LOS. PROPOSED OPERATIONS The existing parcel at 501 S Airport Boulevard in South San Francisco, CA is owned by Robert Simms and includes an unused 1-story metal and brick building of 23,596 square feet and 424 parking spaces. The site has two access points: an unsignalized access driveway on S Airport Boulevard at the northwestern portion of the project site and two closely spaced, unsignalized, and full access driveways on N Access Road at the southeastern portion of the site. The driveway on S Airport Boulevard will restrict westbound left-turn movements out of the site. As indicated in the application, Amazon (tenant) would use the property for their vehicle fleet storage and for on-site training. Amazon will not be utilizing the existing building on the site, only the parking spaces. A site plan of the proposed off-site parking is included as Attachment B. The lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would replace the parking lot at 101 Terminal Court and therefore, this would result in a redistribution of vehicles from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court to the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. It is assumed that the existing schedule will remain. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS With the passage of SB 743, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) has become an important indicator for determining if a new development will result in a “significant transportation impact” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This section summarizes the VMT analysis and resultant findings for the proposed development. VMT is calculated as the product of daily vehicle trips generated and the trip distance. Therefore, to determine the change in VMT between the existing off-site parking lot and the proposed off-site parking lot, the daily trips generated and the trip distances were evaluated. There is no proposed change in operations at DSF5, and therefore the daily number of vehicle trips with the change in off- site parking lots would remain the same. The distance between DSF5 and the existing off-site parking lot at 101 Terminal Court is approximately 1.17 miles, and the distance between DSF5 and the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is approximately 0.86 miles. The path to the proposed off-site parking lot is shorter than the path to the existing off-site parking lot, and 57 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 therefore the trip distance would be reduced with the new proposed off-site parking lot. Since the daily trips remain the same, but the trip distance is reduced, the VMT should be reduced with the rerouting of trips to the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. The change to the new proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would result in a less than significant VMT impact. PROJECT VOLUMES The project volumes for this project were determined by estimating the existing DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court and reassigning them to the 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot. Since the operations are the same for both parking lots, the overall vehicle trips from each parking lot cancelled each other out and resulted in no new vehicle trips being generated to the general vicinity. However, because the 101 Terminal Court parking lot is located to the northwest of DSF5 and the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot is located to the southwest of DSF5, this project resulted in a reassignment of vehicle trips that affected the study intersections. It should be noted that the delivery van trips leaving DSF5 will not change, and therefore this traffic analysis will only focus on the traffic operations up until the delivery vans arrive at DSF5 in the morning (before they go on their delivery routes) and after they return to DSF5 in the evening. To determine the net change in volumes at the study intersections, the DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were removed from the roadway network from the 101 Terminal Court parking lot and then added back onto the roadway network to use the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot. As shown in Attachment B, the DSP Personal Vehicle trips and delivery vans were scheduled to occur outside of the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM). However, to conservatively evaluate the project on the adjacent roadway network, it was assumed that the vehicle trips from the off-site parking lot from 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM would occur during the AM peak hour. In addition, it was conservatively assumed that the vehicle trips from the off-site parking lot from 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM would occur during the PM peak hour. Trip Generation Table 2 summarizes the vehicle trips assumed to occur during the AM and PM peak hours at the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. It should be noted that these same number of trips were removed from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court. Table 2: Project Trip Generation Trip Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total DSP Personal Vehicles 54 0 54 0 15 15 Delivery Vans 0 72 72 6 0 6 Total 54 72 126 6 15 21 58 Page 6 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Trip Distribution It was assumed that DSP Personal Vehicle trips had the following distribution based on the trip distribution shown in the Genentech TIA: · US-101 (north) = 33% · US-101 (south) = 40% · I-380 (west) = 9% · South San Francisco (West) via S Airport Blvd north of Utah Avenue = 18% The delivery van trips were assumed to send 100 percent of their trips between the parking lot and the delivery stations for the purposes of this analysis. After the existing off-site DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were removed, the proposed off-site DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were added back to the roadway network. The trip distributions for the DSP Personal Vehicle trips and the delivery van trips for the proposed parking lot were assumed to be the same as for the existing parking lot. However, since the location of the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is to the southwest, the reassignment of trips primarily resulted in additional vehicle trips to the westbound left turn movement at Intersection #1, S Airport Boulevard and Utah Avenue. In addition, this resulted in a net increase of vehicles to each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. Project volumes are shown in Figure 2. 59 1342DSF5 DELIVERY STATION(250 UTAH AVE)PROPOSED PARKING LOT(501 S AIRPORT BLVD)EXISTING PARKING LOT(101 TERMINAL CT)Utah AvenueS Airport BoulevardN Access RoadUS101INTERSTATEINTERSTATE380 FIGURE 2EXISTING PRO-ECT AND EXISTINGPRO-ECTPEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMESMAY 2024NNOT TO SCALEDSF5 - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAEXISTING VOLUMESPRO-ECT VOLUMESEXISTING PLUS PRO-ECT VOLUMES197(944)1(2)91(208)10(18)0(3)25(25)558(95) 416(607) 13(13) 753(165) 279(449) 10(13)125(25)25(25)591(1831) 32(25) 1017(602) 25(25)256(51)4(12)161(306) 239(489) 216(1061) 69(77) 817(623) 100(422)3Utah AvenueS Airport Boulevard 316(247)568(391)295(540) 418(731)4S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampUtah AvenueS Airport Boulevard S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampUtah AvenueS Airport Boulevard S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampLEGENDXAM(PM) PEAK HOUR VOLUMEXX(YY)PARKING FACILITIESAMA=ON DELIVERY STATIONSSTUDY INTERSECTIONS0(6)0(-6)-72(0) 10(0) 72(0) 0(3)172(3)10(6) 44(0)20(6)5(0)35(0)4197(950)1(2)91(202)10(18)0(3)25(25)486(95) 426(607) 13(13) 825(165) 279(452) 10(13)172(3)25(25)25(25)10(6) 591(1831) 32(25) 44(0) 1017(602) 25(25)256(51)4(18)161(306) 239(489) 216(1061) 69(77) 822(623) 100(422)3316(247)573(391)295(540) 418(731)460 Page 8 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LOS RESULTS Project volumes were added to the existing baseline volumes and are shown in Figure 2. Table 3 shows the existing plus project LOS summary for each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. As shown, each intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. Analysis outputs are shown in Attachment C. 61 Page 9 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Table 3: Existing Plus Project LOS Summary #Intersection Criteria Control Existing Existing + Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Δ Delay LOS Delay Δ Delay 1 S Airport Blvd/Utah Ave D Signal C 32.2 C 32.1 D 38.7 6.5 C 32.3 0.2 2 S Airport Blvd/ Parking Lot Driveway D SSSC A 0.9 A 8.0 A 1.7 0.8 A 8.6 0.6 Southbound Left Turn A 0.0 A 0.0 B 11.1 11.1 A 8.9 8.9 Westbound Approach A 0.0 A 0.0 B 14.4 14.4 B 10.4 10.4 3 S Airport Blvd/N Access Rd/I-380 On-ramp D Signal B 16.7 C 27.4 B 16.7 0.0 C 27.6 0.2 4 S Airport Blvd/I-380 Off-ramp D Signal C 22.4 C 31.0 C 22.6 0.2 C 31.1 0.1 Results shown in bold indicate locations and time periods operating at a deficient LOS. 62 Page 10 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Conclusion Amazon is considering leasing the existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard for DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van off-site parking for its nearby Amazon fulfilment site DSF5 in South San Francisco, CA. These would not be new trips, but a relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off- site parking lot. VEHICLE CIRCULATION An intersection analysis was completed at four (4) intersections near the project site that would experience an increase in peak hour traffic due to the relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off-site parking lot to the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard off-site parking lot. Based on this analysis, each intersection currently operates at an acceptable level of service and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the reassignment of trips. VMT ANALYSIS The distance between DSF5 and the existing off-site parking lot at 101 Terminal Court is approximately 1.17 miles, and the distance between DSF5 and the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is approximately 0.86 miles. The path to the proposed off-site parking lot is shorter than the path to the existing off-site parking lot, and therefore the trip distance would be reduced with the new proposed off-site parking lot. Since the daily trips remain the same, but the trip distance is reduced, the VMT should be reduced with the rerouting of trips to the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. The change to the new proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would result in a less than significant VMT impact. 63 Page 11 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Attachments Attachment A – Vehicle Schedule for DSF5 and the 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot Attachment B – 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot Site Plan Attachment C – Synchro Outputs 64 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 01:30 52 0 52 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 53 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 12 0 12 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 06:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 25 0 25 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 24 24 48 0 0 0 24 25 49 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 96 0 0 0 48 48 96 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 28 0 0 0 4 24 28 11:30 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 4 7 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 52 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 52 13:00 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 13:30 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 29 0 29 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 23 12 12 24 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 0 29 29 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 13 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 14 18:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 19:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 30 6 36 0 0 0 31 6 37 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 24 30 54 0 0 0 24 31 55 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 24 56 0 0 0 32 24 56 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 32 39 0 0 0 8 32 40 21:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 8 0 0 0 1 8 9 22:00 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 13 22:30 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 92 92 184 13 13 26 0 0 0 200 200 400 40 40 80 345 345 690 DSA5 - Station Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 65 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 008:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 009:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 24 24 0 0 0 24 24 48 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 48 48 0 0 0 30 48 78 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 24 24 0 0 0 14 24 38 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 4 5 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 10 16 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 33 30 0 30 0 0 0 30 33 63 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 24 0 24 0 0 0 24 14 38 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 32 0 32 0 0 0 32 13 45 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 7 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 150 100 100 200 0 0 0 175 175 350 DSF5 - Off-Site Parking Lot Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 66 PARCEL AREA 204,092 SQ.FT. 4.6853 ACRESN ACCESS RDS AIRPORT BLVDBEACON STΔΔSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONLEGAL DESCRIPTION“”“”“” “” “”BASIS OF BEARINGSPARKING SUMMARYPARCEL SUMMARYSIGNIFICANT OBSERVATIONSNOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B’GENERAL NOTESZONING INFORMATION67 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 753 558 416 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 753 558 416 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1589 1900 1500 1900 1781 1856 1841 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 810 600 447 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %0 0 0 21 0 27 0 8 3 4 6 6 Cap, veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 2019 63 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1610 3026 0 1271 1810 3385 1572 3401 3406 107 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 810 600 225 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1610 1513 0 1271 1810 1692 1572 1700 1721 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.6 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.6 4.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 1020 1062 V/C Ratio(X)0.41 0.00 0.19 0.61 0.00 0.67 0.44 0.22 1.01 0.84 0.22 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 122 0 108 1144 0 481 122 1339 803 892 1020 1062 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.0 0.0 34.7 31.3 0.0 31.5 36.4 14.9 16.1 28.1 7.1 7.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 1.5 1.8 0.0 5.3 12.0 0.1 34.0 5.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.3 1.6 21.7 5.4 1.4 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.0 0.0 36.2 33.1 0.0 36.8 48.4 15.0 50.1 33.9 7.2 7.2 LnGrp LOS D A D C A D D B F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 38 311 1121 1061 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.2 34.3 40.7 22.3 Approach LOS D C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 33.9 7.2 5.5 48.5 13.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 29.4 5.0 5.0 43.9 28.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.6 31.4 3.1 2.4 6.6 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 68 HCM 6th TWSC Existing 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 1017 0 0 591 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 1017 0 0 591 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 1105 0 0 642 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1267 1819 339 1480 1836 553 677 0 0 1105 0 0 Stage 1 660 660 - 1159 1159 ------- Stage 2 607 1159 - 321 677 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 126 77 657 87 75 477 911 -- 628 -- Stage 1 418 458 - 208 268 ------- Stage 2 450 268 - 665 450 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 123 75 657 82 73 477 911 -- 628 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 123 75 - 82 73 ------- Stage 1 405 458 - 202 260 ------- Stage 2 437 260 - 637 450 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 26.6 0 0.2 0 HCM LOS D A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)911 -- 123 657 -- 628 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 -- 0.221 0.041 ----- HCM Control Delay (s)9.1 -- 42.4 10.7 0 0 0 -- HCM Lane LOS A --E B A A A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 -- 0.8 0.1 --0 -- 69 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 817 69 161 239 216 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 817 69 161 239 216 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 58 4 0 104 851 72 168 249 225 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 27 129 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 62 0 104 918 0 168 301 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)3 3 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)46 23 Heavy Vehicles (%)2%2%2%14%0%0%4%4%10%11%12%9% Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Effective Green, g (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)326 998 1960 361 337 144 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.27 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.89 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 6.4 8.2 27.5 29.0 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 24.6 0.4 Delay (s)27.3 0.6 0.9 28.5 53.6 26.7 Level of Service C A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 27.3 0.9 40.9 Approach LOS A C A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 70 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)568 316 0 418 295 0 Future Volume (vph)568 316 0 418 295 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3467 1583 4550 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3467 1583 4550 3195 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)611 340 0 449 317 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 270 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)611 70 0 449 317 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)2 2 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)21 Heavy Vehicles (%)1%2%0%14%13%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Effective Green, g (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)710 324 1377 923 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.10 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.21 0.33 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 25.5 22.0 17.9 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Incremental Delay, d2 10.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s)35.9 22.3 18.0 2.7 Level of Service D C B A Approach Delay (s)31.0 18.0 2.7 Approach LOS C B A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.2%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 71 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 944 2 208 13 449 165 95 607 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 944 2 208 13 449 165 95 607 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 3 19 974 0 214 13 463 170 98 626 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Cap, veh/h 54 6 54 1140 0 507 276 1237 1059 151 843 17 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1465 169 1447 3252 0 1447 1626 3244 1447 3155 3250 67 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 19 974 0 214 13 463 170 98 312 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1634 0 1447 1626 0 1447 1626 1622 1447 1577 1622 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.3 0.0 11.1 0.7 10.1 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.3 0.0 11.1 0.7 10.1 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 61 0 54 1140 0 507 276 1237 1059 151 421 440 V/C Ratio(X)0.48 0.00 0.35 0.85 0.00 0.42 0.05 0.37 0.16 0.65 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 125 0 110 1803 0 802 323 1237 1059 241 421 440 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.4 0.0 46.2 29.6 0.0 24.3 34.1 21.9 4.0 46.0 33.4 33.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 3.9 2.5 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.3 4.6 11.2 10.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 10.7 0.0 3.8 0.3 3.9 2.8 1.3 8.0 8.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.1 0.0 50.1 32.1 0.0 24.9 34.2 22.8 4.3 50.6 44.6 44.2 LnGrp LOS D A D C A C C C A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 48 1188 646 737 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.3 30.8 18.2 45.2 Approach LOS D C B D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 42.0 8.2 21.2 30.0 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 37.5 7.5 19.5 25.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 12.1 3.7 2.7 19.4 29.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 72 HCM 6th TWSC Existing 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 602 0 0 1831 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 602 0 0 1831 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 654 0 0 1990 27 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2385 2712 1009 1703 2725 327 2017 0 0 654 0 0 Stage 1 2004 2004 - 708 708 ------- Stage 2 381 708 - 995 2017 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 18 21 238 59 20 669 279 -- 929 -- Stage 1 61 103 - 392 436 ------- Stage 2 613 436 - 262 101 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 17 19 238 48 18 669 279 -- 929 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 17 19 - 48 18 ------- Stage 1 55 103 - 354 394 ------- Stage 2 554 394 - 232 101 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$ 393.2 0 0.8 0 HCM LOS F A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)279 -- 17 238 -- 929 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 -- 1.598 0.114 ----- HCM Control Delay (s)19.3 --$ 764.3 22.1 0 0 0 -- HCM Lane LOS C --F C A A A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3 -- 3.9 0.4 --0 -- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 73 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 12 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 12 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3373 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3373 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 53 12 0 435 642 79 315 504 1094 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 141 365 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 65 0 435 714 0 315 910 182 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)4 5 30 Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)12.5 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s)12.5 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.32 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)383 788 1548 1092 977 443 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.21 0.09 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.55 0.46 0.29 0.93 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 44.1 22.4 21.3 28.2 36.3 29.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.17 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 14.9 0.6 Delay (s)44.3 4.5 2.4 28.3 51.3 30.0 Level of Service D A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 44.3 3.2 41.4 Approach LOS A D A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.0 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2%ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 74 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Future Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3367 1568 4988 3471 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3367 1568 4988 3471 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)412 260 0 769 568 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 217 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)412 43 0 769 568 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)26 Heavy Vehicles (%)4%3%0%4%4%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Effective Green, g (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)557 259 1192 1640 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.15 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.17 0.65 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 43.6 39.4 37.7 18.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 Incremental Delay, d2 5.1 0.3 1.2 0.1 Delay (s)48.8 39.7 38.9 3.5 Level of Service D D D A Approach Delay (s)45.3 38.9 3.5 Approach LOS D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.0 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.7%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 75 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing + Project 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: AM Peak Scenario 1 Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 825 486 426 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 825 486 426 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1589 1900 1500 1900 1781 1856 1841 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 887 523 458 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %0 0 0 21 0 27 0 8 3 4 6 6 Cap, veh/h 67 0 59 351 0 147 25 1378 822 649 1992 61 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.41 0.41 0.19 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1610 3026 0 1271 1810 3385 1572 3401 3409 104 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 887 523 231 241 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1610 1513 0 1271 1810 1692 1572 1700 1721 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 4.8 0.0 5.3 0.4 4.2 29.4 10.6 4.7 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 4.8 0.0 5.3 0.4 4.2 29.4 10.6 4.7 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 67 0 59 351 0 147 25 1378 822 649 1005 1047 V/C Ratio(X)0.40 0.00 0.18 0.61 0.00 0.67 0.44 0.22 1.08 0.81 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 125 0 111 1177 0 495 125 1378 822 918 1046 1089 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 0.0 33.7 30.4 0.0 30.6 35.3 13.9 15.2 27.9 7.2 7.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.0 5.1 11.9 0.1 54.8 3.6 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.3 1.5 26.4 4.4 1.4 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.9 0.0 35.2 32.1 0.0 35.7 47.3 14.0 70.0 31.5 7.3 7.3 LnGrp LOS D A D C A D D B F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 38 311 1198 995 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.1 33.2 55.8 20.0 Approach LOS D C E C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.3 33.9 7.2 5.5 46.7 12.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 29.4 5.0 5.0 43.9 28.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.6 31.4 3.1 2.4 6.7 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.7 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 76 HCM 6th TWSC Existing + Project 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: AM Peak Scenario 1 Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 72 25 1017 44 10 591 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 72 25 1017 44 10 591 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 78 27 1105 48 11 642 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1289 1889 339 1526 1882 577 677 0 0 1153 0 0 Stage 1 682 682 - 1183 1183 ------- Stage 2 607 1207 - 343 699 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 121 70 657 81 70 460 911 -- 602 -- Stage 1 406 448 - 201 261 ------- Stage 2 450 254 - 646 440 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 97 67 657 75 67 460 911 -- 602 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 97 67 - 75 67 ------- Stage 1 394 440 - 195 253 ------- Stage 2 362 246 - 608 432 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 33.4 14.4 0.2 0.2 HCM LOS D B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)911 -- 97 657 - 460 602 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 -- 0.28 0.041 - 0.17 0.018 -- HCM Control Delay (s)9.1 -- 56 10.7 0 14.4 11.1 -- HCM Lane LOS A --F B A B B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 --1 0.1 - 0.6 0.1 -- 77 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 822 69 161 239 216 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 822 69 161 239 216 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 58 4 0 104 856 72 168 249 225 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 27 129 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 62 0 104 923 0 168 301 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)3 3 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)46 23 Heavy Vehicles (%)2%2%2%14%0%0%4%4%10%11%12%9% Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Effective Green, g (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)326 998 1960 361 337 144 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.27 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.89 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 6.4 8.2 27.5 29.0 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 24.6 0.4 Delay (s)27.3 0.6 1.0 28.5 53.6 26.7 Level of Service C A A C D C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.0 27.3 0.9 40.9 Approach LOS A C A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh)16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 78 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)573 316 0 418 295 0 Future Volume (vph)573 316 0 418 295 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3467 1583 4550 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3467 1583 4550 3195 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)616 340 0 449 317 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 270 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)616 70 0 449 317 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)2 2 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)21 Heavy Vehicles (%)1%2%0%14%13%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Effective Green, g (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)710 324 1377 923 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.10 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.21 0.33 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 25.5 22.0 17.9 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Incremental Delay, d2 10.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s)36.4 22.3 18.0 2.7 Level of Service D C B A Approach Delay (s/veh)31.4 18.0 2.7 Approach LOS C B A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh)22.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.2%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 79 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing + Project 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: PM PEAK Scenario 1 Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 950 2 202 13 452 165 95 607 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 950 2 202 13 452 165 95 607 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 3 19 980 0 208 13 466 170 98 626 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Cap, veh/h 54 6 54 1145 0 509 276 1234 1060 151 841 17 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1465 169 1447 3252 0 1447 1626 3244 1447 3155 3250 67 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 19 980 0 208 13 466 170 98 312 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1634 0 1447 1626 0 1447 1626 1622 1447 1577 1622 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.5 0.0 10.7 0.7 10.2 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.5 0.0 10.7 0.7 10.2 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 61 0 54 1145 0 509 276 1234 1060 151 420 439 V/C Ratio(X)0.48 0.00 0.35 0.86 0.00 0.41 0.05 0.38 0.16 0.65 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 124 0 110 1798 0 800 322 1234 1060 240 420 439 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 46.3 29.6 0.0 24.2 34.3 22.1 4.0 46.1 33.5 33.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 3.9 2.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.3 4.6 11.4 10.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 10.8 0.0 3.7 0.3 4.0 2.8 1.3 8.1 8.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.3 0.0 50.2 32.2 0.0 24.7 34.3 23.0 4.3 50.7 44.9 44.5 LnGrp LOS D A D C A C C C A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 48 1188 649 737 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.5 30.9 18.3 45.5 Approach LOS D C B D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 42.0 8.2 21.2 30.0 39.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 37.5 7.5 19.5 25.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 12.2 3.7 2.7 19.4 29.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 80 HCM 6th TWSC Existing + Project 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: PM PEAK Scenario 1 Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 3 25 602 0 6 1831 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 3 25 602 0 6 1831 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 3 27 654 0 7 1990 27 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2399 2726 1009 1717 2739 327 2017 0 0 654 0 0 Stage 1 2018 2018 - 708 708 ------- Stage 2 381 708 - 1009 2031 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 17 20 238 58 20 669 279 -- 929 -- Stage 1 60 101 - 392 436 ------- Stage 2 613 436 - 257 99 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 16 18 238 47 18 669 279 -- 929 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 16 18 - 47 18 ------- Stage 1 54 100 - 354 394 ------- Stage 2 551 394 - 226 98 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$ 426.4 10.4 0.8 0 HCM LOS F B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)279 -- 16 238 - 669 929 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 -- 1.698 0.114 - 0.005 0.007 -- HCM Control Delay (s)19.3 --$ 830.6 22.1 0 10.4 8.9 -- HCM Lane LOS C --F C A B A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3 --4 0.4 -0 0 -- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 81 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: PM PEAK Existing+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 18 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 18 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3388 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3388 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 53 19 0 435 642 79 315 504 1094 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 141 356 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 72 0 435 714 0 315 910 191 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)4 5 30 Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)12.7 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s)12.7 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.44 0.44 0.32 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)390 787 1545 1090 975 442 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.21 0.09 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.55 0.46 0.29 0.93 0.43 Uniform Delay, d1 44.1 22.5 21.4 28.3 36.5 29.8 Progression Factor 1.00 0.17 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 15.2 0.7 Delay (s)44.3 4.5 2.4 28.4 51.7 30.4 Level of Service D A A C D C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.0 44.3 3.2 41.8 Approach LOS A D A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh)27.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.2 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2%ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 82 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: PM PEAK Existing+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Future Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3367 1568 4988 3471 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3367 1568 4988 3471 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)412 260 0 769 568 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 217 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)412 43 0 769 568 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)26 Heavy Vehicles (%)4%3%0%4%4%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.2 Effective Green, g (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)556 258 1190 1644 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.15 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.17 0.65 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 39.5 37.8 18.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 0.3 1.2 0.1 Delay (s)49.0 39.8 39.0 3.5 Level of Service D D D A Approach Delay (s/veh)45.5 39.0 3.5 Approach LOS D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh)31.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.2 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.7%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 83 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 May 16, 2024 Ms. Seema Adina Senior Entitlements Manager Amazon (transmitted via email) RE:Delivery Station DFA5 - Traffic Memorandum – South San Francisco, CA Dear Ms. Adina: Amazon has requested that a traffic analysis be completed for the Delivery Station DFA5 at 400 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco, CA. The existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard (project) is proposed to serve as off-site parking for Delivery Service Provider (DSP) Personal Vehicles and delivery vans for DFA5. The traffic study will show no vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts and no adverse effects to the traffic operations in the surrounding area. This memorandum summarizes the methodology, analysis, and results of the anticipated traffic effects due to the project. Background EXISTING OPERATIONS Amazon has an existing delivery station in South San Francisco: DFA5 at 400 Littlefield Avenue. This site currently utilizes one off-site parking lot located at 101 Terminal Court, South San Francisco, CA. That existing off-site parking lot has approximately 1,300 available parking spaces, but is only allocated 130 parking spaces. On average, only 100 parking spaces are used on a typical day for the DFA5 Station. The remaining spaces are either used by the existing DSF5 delivery station at 250 A Utah Avenue in South San Francisco, or remain unoccupied. EXISTING SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES Amazon provided a schedule of vehicles entering and exiting the existing delivery station and the off- site parking lot. This schedule is provided in Attachment A and the majority of vehicles were planned to avoid the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. For the on-site parking lot, DSP Personal Vehicles would arrive at DFA5 in 25- vehicle waves at 9:20 AM, 9:50 AM, and 10:50 AM and the vans would depart from the station at 10:10 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:30 AM. For the off-site parking lot, DSP Personal Vehicles would arrive at the off-site parking lot in 25-vehicle waves at 10:00 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:00 AM, depart 30 minutes later in the delivery vans to DFA5, and depart from DFA5 in the delivery vans 20 minutes later. In the evenings, the delivery vans would return starting at 7:00 PM and ending at 9:00 PM. Off- site delivery vans are encouraged to return back to the station before going back to the off-site parking lot. It should be noted that these hours are well after the weekday PM peak period between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. After returning to the delivery station, vans return to the off-site parking lot, and then DSP Personal Vehicles would depart the off-site parking lot during the same 30-minute time period. The project vehicle trips for DFA5 are shown in Figure 1. 84 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1: DFA5 Vehicle Trips Generated by Time of Day 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 37 53 34 14 0 0 0 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 00:0000:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:0022:3023:0023:30#ofTripsTime of Day Project Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak PM Peak Hours 85 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1 highlights the trips avoiding the typical weekday peak hours. Therefore, the existing peak hour traffic counts collected at study intersections would not include the DFA5 trips. Traffic Analysis INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The intersection level of service (LOS) and queuing were reviewed at each of the four (4) study intersections using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology within Synchro software. Similar to other approved traffic studies, the City considers LOS A through LOS D to be acceptable levels of service. LOS E and LOS F are considered unacceptable levels of service. Baseline Volumes The baseline volumes are from the Genentech Master Plan Transportation Impact Assessment1 (Genentech TIA) prepared by Fehr and Peers and dated August 28, 2019. The existing volumes from this study are based on May 2016 volumes provided by the City and therefore represent pre-COVID conditions. It should be noted that no volumes were provided at Intersection #2, S Airport Boulevard and Project Driveway. Instead, the volumes for this intersection were determined by balancing with the volumes from the intersection to the south at S Airport Boulevard and N Access Road/I-380 on- ramp. The turning movements for this intersection were assumed to be 25 vehicles per hour. Existing baseline volumes are shown in Figure 2. Baseline Lane Geometry and Signal Timing The intersection lane geometries and signal timing parameters are based on the Synchro outputs from the Genentech TIA as well. Because the signal timing parameters are not explicitly stated in the Genentech TIA, Kimley-Horn made assumptions to best represent the existing signal timing inputs. The intersection LOS of each study intersection were compared to the existing condition results in the Genentech TIA and were determined to be consistent. EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS RESULTS Table 1 shows the existing LOS summary for each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that these existing LOS include the DFA5 operations, albeit the peak hour trips from the DFA5 operations are minimal because the DFA5 operations focus on non-peak hour operations. As shown, each intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. For Intersection #2, the parking lot driveway on S Airport Boulevard, the delays for the southbound left turn into the new proposed parking lot and for the westbound approach, which is the outbound movement for the proposed parking lot, are zero seconds since there are no volumes for these movements in the existing condition because the proposed parking lot is vacant. Analysis outputs are shown in Attachment C. 1 Genentech Master Plan Transportation Impact Assessment, Fehr and Peers, August 28, 2019. 86 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Table 1: Existing LOS Summary #Intersection Criteria Control Existing AM Peak PM Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay 1 S Airport Blvd/Utah Ave D Signal C 32.2 C 32.1 2 S Airport Blvd/Parking Lot Driveway D SSSC A 0.9 A 8.0 Southbound Left Turn1 A 0.0 A 0.0 Westbound Approach1 A 0.0 A 0.0 3 S Airport Blvd/N Access Rd/I-380 On-ramp D Signal B 16.7 C 27.4 4 S Airport Blvd/I-380 Off-ramp D Signal C 22.4 C 31.0 1The southbound left turn and westbound approach (project access) have zero vehicles in the existing condition. Results shown in bold indicate locations and time periods operating at a deficient LOS. PROPOSED OPERATIONS The existing parcel at 501 S Airport Boulevard in South San Francisco, CA is owned by Robert Simms and includes an unused 1-story metal and brick building of 23,596 square feet and 424 parking spaces. The site has two access points: an unsignalized access driveway on S Airport Boulevard at the northwestern portion of the project site and two closely spaced, unsignalized, and full access driveways on N Access Road at the southeastern portion of the site. The driveway on S Airport Boulevard will restrict westbound left-turn movements out of the site. As indicated in the application, Amazon (tenant) would use the property for their vehicle fleet storage and for on-site training. Amazon will not be utilizing the existing building on the site, only the parking spaces. A site plan of the proposed off-site parking is included as Attachment B. The lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would replace the parking lot at 101 Terminal Court and therefore, this would result in a redistribution of vehicles from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court to the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. It is assumed that the existing schedule will remain. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS With the passage of SB 743, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) has become an important indicator for determining if a new development will result in a “significant transportation impact” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This section summarizes the VMT analysis and resultant findings for the proposed development. VMT is calculated as the product of daily vehicle trips generated and the trip distance. Therefore, to determine the change in VMT between the existing off-site parking lot and the proposed off-site parking lot, the daily trips generated and the trip distances were evaluated. There is no proposed change in operations at DFA5, and therefore the daily number of vehicle trips with the change in off- site parking lots would remain the same. The distance between DFA5 and the existing off-site parking lot at 101 Terminal Court is approximately 1.61 miles, and the distance between DFA5 and the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is approximately 1.26 miles. The path to the proposed off-site parking lot is shorter than the path to the existing off-site parking lot, and 87 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 therefore the trip distance would be reduced with the new proposed off-site parking lot. Since the daily trips remain the same, but the trip distance is reduced, the VMT should be reduced with the rerouting of trips to the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. The change to the new proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would result in a less than significant VMT impact. PROJECT VOLUMES The project volumes for this project were determined by estimating the existing DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court and reassigning them to the 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot. Since the operations are the same for both parking lots, the overall vehicle trips from each parking lot cancelled each other out and resulted in no new vehicle trips being generated to the general vicinity. However, because the 101 Terminal Court parking lot is located to the northwest of DFA5 and the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot is located to the southwest of DFA5, this project resulted in a reassignment of vehicle trips that affected the study intersections. It should be noted that the delivery van trips leaving DFA5 will not change, and therefore this traffic analysis will only focus on the traffic operations up until the delivery vans arrive at DFA5 in the morning (before they go on their delivery routes) and after they return to DFA5 in the evening. To determine the net change in volumes at the study intersections, the DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were removed from the roadway network from the 101 Terminal Court parking lot and then added back onto the roadway network to use the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard parking lot. As shown in Attachment B, the DSP Personal Vehicle trips and delivery vans were scheduled to occur outside of the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM). However, to conservatively evaluate the project on the adjacent roadway network, it was assumed that the vehicle trips from the off-site parking lot from 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM would occur during the AM peak hour. In addition, it was conservatively assumed that the vehicle trips from the off-site parking lot from 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM would occur during the PM peak hour. Trip Generation Table 2 summarizes the vehicle trips assumed to occur during the AM and PM peak hours at the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. It should be noted that these same number of trips were removed from the existing parking lot at 101 Terminal Court. Table 2: Project Trip Generation Trip Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total DSP Personal Vehicles 50 0 50 0 5 5 Delivery Vans 0 25 25 5 0 5 Total 50 25 75 5 5 10 88 Page 6 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Trip Distribution It was assumed that DSP Personal Vehicle trips had the following distribution based on the trip distribution shown in the Genentech TIA: · US-101 (north) = 33% · US-101 (south) = 40% · I-380 (west) = 9% · South San Francisco (West) via S Airport Blvd north of Utah Avenue = 18% The delivery van trips were assumed to send 100 percent of their trips between the parking lot and the delivery stations for the purposes of this analysis. After the existing off-site DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were removed, the proposed off-site DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van trips were added back to the roadway network. The trip distributions for the DSP Personal Vehicle trips and the delivery van trips for the proposed parking lot were assumed to be the same as for the existing parking lot. However, since the location of the proposed parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is to the southwest, the reassignment of trips primarily resulted in additional vehicle trips to the westbound left turn movement at Intersection #1, S Airport Boulevard and Utah Avenue. In addition, this resulted in a net increase of vehicles to each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. Project volumes are shown in Figure 2. 89 1342DFA5 DELIVERY STATION(400 LITTLEFIELD AVE)PROPOSED PARKING LOT(501 S AIRPORT BLVD)EXISTING PARKING LOT(101 TERMINAL CT)Utah AvenueS Airport BoulevardN Access RoadUS101INTERSTATEINTERSTATE380 FIGURE 2EXISTING PRO-ECT AND EXISTINGPRO-ECTPEAK +OUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMESNNOT TO SCALEDFA5 DELIVERY STATION - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CAEXISTING VOLUMESPRO-ECT VOLUMESEXISTING PLUS PRO-ECT VOLUMES197(944)1(2)91(208)10(18)0(3)25(25)558(95) 416(607) 13(13) 753(165) 279(449) 10(13)125(25)25(25)591(1831) 32(25) 1017(602) 25(25)256(51)4(12)161(306) 239(489) 216(1061) 69(77) 817(623) 100(422)3Utah AvenueS Airport Boulevard 316(247)568(391)295(540) 418(731)4S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampUtah AvenueS Airport Boulevard S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampUtah AvenueS Airport Boulevard S Airport Boulevard Project DrivewayS Airport Boulevard N Access RoadS Airport BoulevardI-380 Off-RampI-380 On-RampLEGENDXAM(PM) PEAK +OUR VOLUMEXX(YY)PARKING FACILITIESAMA=ON DELIVERY STATIONSSTUDY INTERSECTIONS0(5)0(-5)-25(0) 9(0) 25(0) 0(1)125(1)9(5) 41(0)20(2)5(0)35(0)4197(949)1(2)91(203)10(18)0(3)25(25)533(95) 425(607) 13(13) 778(165) 279(450) 10(13)125(1)25(25)25(25)9(5) 591(1831) 32(25) 41(0) 1017(602) 25(25)256(51)4(14)161(306) 239(489) 216(1061) 69(77) 822(623) 100(422)3316(247)573(391)295(540) 418(731)490 Page 8 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LOS RESULTS Project volumes were added to the existing baseline volumes and are shown in Figure 2. Table 3 shows the existing plus project LOS summary for each study intersection in the AM and PM peak hours. As shown, each intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. Analysis outputs are shown in Attachment C. 91 Page 9 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Table 3: Existing Plus Project LOS Summary #Intersection Criteria Control Existing Existing + Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Δ Delay LOS Delay Δ Delay 1 S Airport Blvd/Utah Ave D Signal C 32.2 C 32.1 D 35.3 3.1 D 32.2 0.1 2 S Airport Blvd/Parking Lot Driveway D SSSC A 0.9 A 8.0 A 1.2 0.3 A 8.1 0.1 Southbound Left Turn A 0.0 A 0.0 B 11.1 11.1 A 8.9 8.9 Westbound Approach A 0.0 A 0.0 B 13.3 13.3 B 10.4 10.4 3 S Airport Blvd/N Access Rd/I-380 On-ramp D Signal B 16.7 C 27.4 B 16.7 0.0 C 27.5 0.1 4 S Airport Blvd/I-380 Off-ramp D Signal C 22.4 C 31.0 C 22.6 0.2 C 31.0 0.0 Results shown in bold indicate locations and time periods operating at a deficient LOS. 92 Page 10 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Conclusion Amazon is considering leasing the existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard for DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van off-site parking for its nearby Amazon fulfilment site DFA5 in South San Francisco, CA. These would not be new trips, but a relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off- site parking lot. VEHICLE CIRCULATION An intersection analysis was completed at four (4) intersections near the project site that would experience an increase in peak hour traffic due to the relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off-site parking lot to the proposed 501 S Airport Boulevard off-site parking lot. Based on this analysis, each intersection currently operates at an acceptable level of service and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the reassignment of trips. VMT ANALYSIS The distance between DFA5 and the existing off-site parking lot at 101 Terminal Court is approximately 1.61 miles, and the distance between DFA5 and the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard is approximately 1.26 miles. The path to the proposed off-site parking lot is shorter than the path to the existing off-site parking lot, and therefore the trip distance would be reduced with the new proposed off-site parking lot. Since the daily trips remain the same, but the trip distance is reduced, the VMT should be reduced with the rerouting of trips to the proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard. The change to the new proposed off-site parking lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard would result in a less than significant VMT impact. 93 Page 11 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Attachments Attachment A – Vehicle Schedule for DFA5 and the 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot Attachment B – 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot Site Plan Attachment C – Synchro Outputs 94 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01:30 52 0 52 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 1 53 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:30 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 50 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 51 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 26 26 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 50 25 75 0 0 0 75 25 100 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 50 50 11:30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 50 75 0 0 0 28 50 78 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 52 13:00 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 13:30 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 23 11 13 24 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 0 28 28 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 13 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 14 18:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 11 5 16 0 0 0 11 10 21 19:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 10 55 27 82 0 0 0 56 37 93 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 34 34 38 19 57 0 0 0 38 53 91 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 42 21 63 0 0 0 42 34 77 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 12 12 5 2 7 0 0 0 6 14 20 21:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 22:00 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 22:30 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 90 90 180 11 11 22 75 75 150 225 225 450 40 40 80 441 438 879 DFA5 - Station Associates Trucks DSP Vans Flex TotalDSP Drivers 1The 450 van trips generated by the DFA5 Station include 150 van trips generated from the off-site parking lot. 1 95 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 50 0 25 25 0 0 0 50 25 75 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 25 25 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 25 25 0 0 0 25 25 50 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 10 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 10 37 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 19 0 19 0 0 0 19 34 53 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 21 0 21 0 0 0 21 13 34 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 12 14 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 150 75 75 150 0 0 0 150 150 300 DFA5 - Off-Site Parking Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 96 PARCEL AREA 204,092 SQ.FT. 4.6853 ACRESN ACCESS RDS AIRPORT BLVDBEACON STΔΔSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONLEGAL DESCRIPTION“”“”“” “” “”BASIS OF BEARINGSPARKING SUMMARYPARCEL SUMMARYSIGNIFICANT OBSERVATIONSNOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B’GENERAL NOTESZONING INFORMATION97 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 753 558 416 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 753 558 416 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1589 1900 1500 1900 1781 1856 1841 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 810 600 447 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %0 0 0 21 0 27 0 8 3 4 6 6 Cap, veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 2019 63 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1610 3026 0 1271 1810 3385 1572 3401 3406 107 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 810 600 225 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1610 1513 0 1271 1810 1692 1572 1700 1721 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.6 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.6 4.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 1020 1062 V/C Ratio(X)0.41 0.00 0.19 0.61 0.00 0.67 0.44 0.22 1.01 0.84 0.22 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 122 0 108 1144 0 481 122 1339 803 892 1020 1062 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.0 0.0 34.7 31.3 0.0 31.5 36.4 14.9 16.1 28.1 7.1 7.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 1.5 1.8 0.0 5.3 12.0 0.1 34.0 5.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.3 1.6 21.7 5.4 1.4 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.0 0.0 36.2 33.1 0.0 36.8 48.4 15.0 50.1 33.9 7.2 7.2 LnGrp LOS D A D C A D D B F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 38 311 1121 1061 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.2 34.3 40.7 22.3 Approach LOS D C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 33.9 7.2 5.5 48.5 13.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 29.4 5.0 5.0 43.9 28.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.6 31.4 3.1 2.4 6.6 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 98 HCM 6th TWSC Existing 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 1017 0 0 591 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 1017 0 0 591 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 1105 0 0 642 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1267 1819 339 1480 1836 553 677 0 0 1105 0 0 Stage 1 660 660 - 1159 1159 ------- Stage 2 607 1159 - 321 677 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 126 77 657 87 75 477 911 -- 628 -- Stage 1 418 458 - 208 268 ------- Stage 2 450 268 - 665 450 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 123 75 657 82 73 477 911 -- 628 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 123 75 - 82 73 ------- Stage 1 405 458 - 202 260 ------- Stage 2 437 260 - 637 450 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 26.6 0 0.2 0 HCM LOS D A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)911 -- 123 657 -- 628 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 -- 0.221 0.041 ----- HCM Control Delay (s)9.1 -- 42.4 10.7 0 0 0 -- HCM Lane LOS A --E B A A A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 -- 0.8 0.1 --0 -- 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 817 69 161 239 216 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 817 69 161 239 216 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 58 4 0 104 851 72 168 249 225 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 27 129 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 62 0 104 918 0 168 301 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)3 3 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)46 23 Heavy Vehicles (%)2%2%2%14%0%0%4%4%10%11%12%9% Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Effective Green, g (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)326 998 1960 361 337 144 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.27 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.89 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 6.4 8.2 27.5 29.0 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 24.6 0.4 Delay (s)27.3 0.6 0.9 28.5 53.6 26.7 Level of Service C A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 27.3 0.9 40.9 Approach LOS A C A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 100 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 7:00 am 03/31/2022 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)568 316 0 418 295 0 Future Volume (vph)568 316 0 418 295 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3467 1583 4550 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3467 1583 4550 3195 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)611 340 0 449 317 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 270 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)611 70 0 449 317 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)2 2 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)21 Heavy Vehicles (%)1%2%0%14%13%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Effective Green, g (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)710 324 1377 923 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.10 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.21 0.33 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 25.5 22.0 17.9 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Incremental Delay, d2 10.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s)35.9 22.3 18.0 2.7 Level of Service D C B A Approach Delay (s)31.0 18.0 2.7 Approach LOS C B A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.2%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 101 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 944 2 208 13 449 165 95 607 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 944 2 208 13 449 165 95 607 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 3 19 974 0 214 13 463 170 98 626 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Cap, veh/h 54 6 54 1140 0 507 276 1237 1059 151 843 17 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1465 169 1447 3252 0 1447 1626 3244 1447 3155 3250 67 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 19 974 0 214 13 463 170 98 312 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1634 0 1447 1626 0 1447 1626 1622 1447 1577 1622 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.3 0.0 11.1 0.7 10.1 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.3 0.0 11.1 0.7 10.1 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 61 0 54 1140 0 507 276 1237 1059 151 421 440 V/C Ratio(X)0.48 0.00 0.35 0.85 0.00 0.42 0.05 0.37 0.16 0.65 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 125 0 110 1803 0 802 323 1237 1059 241 421 440 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.4 0.0 46.2 29.6 0.0 24.3 34.1 21.9 4.0 46.0 33.4 33.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 3.9 2.5 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.3 4.6 11.2 10.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 10.7 0.0 3.8 0.3 3.9 2.8 1.3 8.0 8.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.1 0.0 50.1 32.1 0.0 24.9 34.2 22.8 4.3 50.6 44.6 44.2 LnGrp LOS D A D C A C C C A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 48 1188 646 737 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.3 30.8 18.2 45.2 Approach LOS D C B D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 42.0 8.2 21.2 30.0 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 37.5 7.5 19.5 25.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 12.1 3.7 2.7 19.4 29.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 102 HCM 6th TWSC Existing 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 602 0 0 1831 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 0 25 602 0 0 1831 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 654 0 0 1990 27 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2385 2712 1009 1703 2725 327 2017 0 0 654 0 0 Stage 1 2004 2004 - 708 708 ------- Stage 2 381 708 - 995 2017 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 18 21 238 59 20 669 279 -- 929 -- Stage 1 61 103 - 392 436 ------- Stage 2 613 436 - 262 101 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 17 19 238 48 18 669 279 -- 929 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 17 19 - 48 18 ------- Stage 1 55 103 - 354 394 ------- Stage 2 554 394 - 232 101 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$ 393.2 0 0.8 0 HCM LOS F A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)279 -- 17 238 -- 929 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 -- 1.598 0.114 ----- HCM Control Delay (s)19.3 --$ 764.3 22.1 0 0 0 -- HCM Lane LOS C --F C A A A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3 -- 3.9 0.4 --0 -- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 103 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 12 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 12 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3373 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3373 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 53 12 0 435 642 79 315 504 1094 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 141 365 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 65 0 435 714 0 315 910 182 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)4 5 30 Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)12.5 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s)12.5 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.32 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)383 788 1548 1092 977 443 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.21 0.09 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.55 0.46 0.29 0.93 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 44.1 22.4 21.3 28.2 36.3 29.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.17 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 14.9 0.6 Delay (s)44.3 4.5 2.4 28.3 51.3 30.0 Level of Service D A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 44.3 3.2 41.4 Approach LOS A D A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.0 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2%ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 104 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: PM Peak Existing PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 4:00 pm 04/01/2020 Existing Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Future Volume (vph)391 247 0 731 540 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3367 1568 4988 3471 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3367 1568 4988 3471 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)412 260 0 769 568 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 217 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)412 43 0 769 568 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)26 Heavy Vehicles (%)4%3%0%4%4%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Effective Green, g (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)557 259 1192 1640 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.15 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.17 0.65 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 43.6 39.4 37.7 18.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 Incremental Delay, d2 5.1 0.3 1.2 0.1 Delay (s)48.8 39.7 38.9 3.5 Level of Service D D D A Approach Delay (s)45.3 38.9 3.5 Approach LOS D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.0 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.7%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 105 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing + Project 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 778 558 425 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 0 10 197 1 91 10 279 778 558 425 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1589 1900 1500 1900 1781 1856 1841 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 837 600 457 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %0 0 0 21 0 27 0 8 3 4 6 6 Cap, veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 2020 62 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1610 3026 0 1271 1810 3385 1572 3401 3409 104 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 11 213 0 98 11 300 837 600 230 241 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1610 1513 0 1271 1810 1692 1572 1700 1721 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.7 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 5.5 0.4 4.4 29.4 12.6 4.7 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 59 347 0 146 25 1339 803 717 1020 1062 V/C Ratio(X)0.41 0.00 0.19 0.61 0.00 0.67 0.44 0.22 1.04 0.84 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 122 0 108 1144 0 481 122 1339 803 892 1020 1062 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.0 0.0 34.7 31.3 0.0 31.5 36.4 14.9 16.1 28.1 7.1 7.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 1.5 1.8 0.0 5.3 12.0 0.1 43.5 5.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.3 1.6 23.8 5.4 1.4 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.0 0.0 36.2 33.1 0.0 36.8 48.4 15.0 59.6 33.9 7.2 7.2 LnGrp LOS D A D C A D D B F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 38 311 1148 1071 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.2 34.3 47.8 22.2 Approach LOS D C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 33.9 7.2 5.5 48.5 13.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 29.4 5.0 5.0 43.9 28.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.6 31.4 3.1 2.4 6.7 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.3 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 106 HCM 6th TWSC Existing + Project 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 25 25 1017 41 9 591 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 25 25 1017 41 9 591 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 27 27 1105 45 10 642 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1287 1884 339 1523 1879 575 677 0 0 1150 0 0 Stage 1 680 680 - 1182 1182 ------- Stage 2 607 1204 - 341 697 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 121 70 657 81 71 461 911 -- 603 -- Stage 1 407 449 - 201 262 ------- Stage 2 450 255 - 647 441 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 110 67 657 75 68 461 911 -- 603 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 110 67 - 75 68 ------- Stage 1 395 441 - 195 254 ------- Stage 2 411 247 - 610 434 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 29.4 13.3 0.2 0.2 HCM LOS D B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)911 -- 110 657 - 461 603 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 -- 0.247 0.041 - 0.059 0.016 -- HCM Control Delay (s)9.1 -- 48.1 10.7 0 13.3 11.1 -- HCM Lane LOS A --E B A B B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 -- 0.9 0.1 - 0.2 0 -- 107 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 822 69 161 239 216 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 56 4 0 100 822 69 161 239 216 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3049 1736 3407 3155 2949 1262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 58 4 0 104 856 72 168 249 225 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 27 129 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 62 0 104 923 0 168 301 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)3 3 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)46 23 Heavy Vehicles (%)2%2%2%14%0%0%4%4%10%11%12%9% Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Effective Green, g (s)7.1 38.2 38.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)326 998 1960 361 337 144 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.27 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.89 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 6.4 8.2 27.5 29.0 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 24.6 0.4 Delay (s)27.3 0.6 1.0 28.5 53.6 26.7 Level of Service C A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 27.3 0.9 40.9 Approach LOS A C A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 108 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: AM Peak Existing+Project AM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:46 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)573 316 0 418 295 0 Future Volume (vph)573 316 0 418 295 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3467 1583 4550 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3467 1583 4550 3195 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)616 340 0 449 317 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 270 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph)616 70 0 449 317 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)2 2 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)21 Heavy Vehicles (%)1%2%0%14%13%0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Effective Green, g (s)13.6 13.6 20.1 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)710 324 1377 923 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.10 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.21 0.33 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 25.5 22.0 17.9 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Incremental Delay, d2 10.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s)36.4 22.3 18.0 2.7 Level of Service D C B A Approach Delay (s)31.4 18.0 2.7 Approach LOS C B A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s)66.4 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.2%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 109 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing + Project 1: S Airport Blvd & Utah Ave Timing Plan: PM PEAK Existing+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 949 2 203 13 450 165 95 607 13 Future Volume (veh/h)25 3 18 949 2 203 13 450 165 95 607 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 3 19 979 0 209 13 464 170 98 626 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Cap, veh/h 54 6 54 1144 0 509 276 1235 1060 151 841 17 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1465 169 1447 3252 0 1447 1626 3244 1447 3155 3250 67 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 19 979 0 209 13 464 170 98 312 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1634 0 1447 1626 0 1447 1626 1622 1447 1577 1622 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.5 0.0 10.8 0.7 10.2 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 27.5 0.0 10.8 0.7 10.2 3.5 3.0 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 61 0 54 1144 0 509 276 1235 1060 151 420 439 V/C Ratio(X)0.48 0.00 0.35 0.86 0.00 0.41 0.05 0.38 0.16 0.65 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 124 0 110 1799 0 800 322 1235 1060 240 420 439 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 46.3 29.6 0.0 24.2 34.2 22.1 4.0 46.1 33.5 33.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 3.9 2.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.3 4.6 11.3 10.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 10.8 0.0 3.7 0.3 4.0 2.8 1.3 8.1 8.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.2 0.0 50.2 32.2 0.0 24.7 34.3 22.9 4.3 50.7 44.9 44.4 LnGrp LOS D A D C A C C C A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 48 1188 647 737 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.4 30.9 18.3 45.5 Approach LOS D C B D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 42.0 8.2 21.2 30.0 39.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 37.5 7.5 19.5 25.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 12.2 3.7 2.7 19.4 29.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 110 HCM 6th TWSC Existing + Project 2: S Airport Blvd & Project Dwy Timing Plan: PM PEAK Existing+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 1 25 602 0 5 1831 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 0 25 0 0 1 25 602 0 5 1831 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 50 -- 50 95 -- 75 -- Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 0 27 0 0 1 27 654 0 5 1990 27 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2395 2722 1009 1713 2735 327 2017 0 0 654 0 0 Stage 1 2014 2014 - 708 708 ------- Stage 2 381 708 - 1005 2027 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 -- 4.14 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 -- 2.22 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 18 20 238 58 20 669 279 -- 929 -- Stage 1 60 101 - 392 436 ------- Stage 2 613 436 - 259 100 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 17 18 238 47 18 669 279 -- 929 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 17 18 - 47 18 ------- Stage 1 54 100 - 354 394 ------- Stage 2 553 394 - 228 100 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$ 393.2 10.4 0.8 0 HCM LOS F B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)279 -- 17 238 - 669 929 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 -- 1.598 0.114 - 0.002 0.006 -- HCM Control Delay (s)19.3 --$ 764.3 22.1 0 10.4 8.9 -- HCM Lane LOS C --F C A B A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3 -- 3.9 0.4 -0 0 -- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 111 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 3: S Airport Blvd & N Access Rd Timing Plan: PM PEAK Existing+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 14 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Future Volume (vph)0 0 0 51 14 0 422 623 77 306 489 1061 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3378 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3378 1770 3476 3433 3072 1393 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 53 14 0 435 642 79 315 504 1094 RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 141 362 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 0 0 0 67 0 435 714 0 315 910 185 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)4 5 30 Turn Type Perm NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 3 4 2 4 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 1 Actuated Green, G (s)12.6 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s)12.6 49.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.32 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)386 787 1546 1091 976 442 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.21 0.09 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.55 0.46 0.29 0.93 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 44.0 22.5 21.3 28.2 36.4 29.5 Progression Factor 1.00 0.17 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 15.1 0.6 Delay (s)44.3 4.5 2.4 28.3 51.5 30.2 Level of Service D A A C D C Approach Delay (s)0.0 44.3 3.2 41.6 Approach LOS A D A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.1 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2%ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 112 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project 4: S Airport Blvd & I-380 Off-ramp Timing Plan: PM Peak Synchro 11 ReportExisting+Project PM Amazon 501 S Airport Blvd Parking Lot 9:47 am 08/25/2022 Existing + Project Kimley-Horn Page 7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 391 247 0 731 540 0 Future Volume (vph) 391 247 0 731 540 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3367 1568 4988 3471 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3367 1568 4988 3471 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)412 260 0 769 568 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 217 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 412 43 0 769 568 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr)26 Heavy Vehicles (%)4% 3% 0% 4% 4% 0% Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 3 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Effective Green, g (s)18.2 18.2 26.3 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 557 259 1192 1640 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.15 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.17 0.65 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 43.6 39.4 37.7 18.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 Incremental Delay, d2 5.1 0.3 1.2 0.1 Delay (s)48.8 39.7 38.9 3.5 Level of Service D D D A Approach Delay (s)45.3 38.9 3.5 Approach LOS D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s)110.0 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 113 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 May 15, 2024 Ms. Seema Adina Senior Entitlements Manager Amazon (transmitted via email) RE:Delivery Station DSF5 - TDM Compliance Memorandum – 250 Utah Avenue, South San Francisco, CA Dear Ms. Adina: The City of South San Francisco (City) has recently requested that Amazon determine if the off-site parking lot project at 501 S. Airport Boulevard in South San Francisco, CA (project) is consistent with the transportation demand management (TDM) program developed for the Amazon Parcel Hub at 250 Utah Avenue. Amazon has requested Kimley-Horn’s assistance in determining this compliance. This memorandum summarizes the project’s compliance with the TDM prepared at 250 Utah Avenue. Background CURRENT TDM PLAN A TDM plan has been prepared for the Amazon Parcel Hub at 250 Utah Avenue by TJKM in September 2015 (see Attachment A). The following is a summary of the 2015 TDM plan: · Target TDM trip reduction is 28 percent for “home-to-work” vehicle trips. · Project description: o The facility will be staffed by approximately 48 employees. o Line haul trucks will deliver goods from 10 PM to 3 AM. This includes up to three (3) line haul trucks each night. o Approximately 40 sortation associates will be employed and divided into two shifts: § 10 PM to 6 AM § 4 AM to 12 PM o Delivery service providers will arrive on-site between 7 AM and 10 AM to be loaded with packages. Up to 40 vans will be loaded at one time within 30-mintue windows. Up to a total of 150 delivery vans will pick-up packages each morning. After completing deliveries from 7 AM to 6 PM, each delivery van will return to the site. o Approximately 6 to 8 managers will be on-site, with half on-site from 12 AM to 8 AM and the other half from 8 AM to 5 PM. · Trip Generation: o The site will generate 96 daily commute trips, one trip inbound and one trip outbound for each of the 48 on-site employees. 114 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 o The key goal of the TDM ordinance is to reduce drive-alone commute trips during the AM and PM peak hours. The 40 sortation associates will work non-standard work hours, resulting in commute trips outside of the typical AM and PM peak hours. o Delivery service providers will generate up to 606 daily trips to and from the site. o Line haul trucks will generate up to 6 daily trips. o Up to 150 delivery vans will generate up to 600 daily trips (two inbound trips and two outbound trips per day). ·TDM Measures to be implemented: o Carpool and Vanpool Ride-matching Services o Designated Employer Contact o Direct Route to Transit o Guaranteed Ride Home o Information Boards/Kiosks o Passenger Loading Zones o Pedestrian Connections o Promotional Programs o Clothes Lockers o Shuttle Program o Transportation Management Association (TMA) o Bicycle Parking, Long-term o Bicycle Parking, Short-term o Free Parking for Carpools and Vanpools o Annual Survey ·Information Requested by the City to determine number of required parking spaces: o Description of type of freight to be distributed o Size of trucks and shipping containers o Number and schedule of deliveries o Amount and duration of storage o Loading and unloading procedures o Circulation plan EXISTING OPERATIONS Amazon has an existing delivery station in South San Francisco: DSF5 at 250 Utah Avenue. This site currently utilizes one off-site parking lot located at 101 Terminal Court, South San Francisco, CA. That existing off-site parking lot has approximately 1,300 available parking spaces, but is only allocated 230 parking spaces. On average, only 126 parking spaces are used on a typical day for the DFA5 Station. The remaining spaces are either used by the existing DFA5 delivery station at 400 Littlefield Avenue in South San Francisco, or remain unoccupied. EXISTING SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES Amazon provided a schedule of vehicles entering and exiting the existing delivery station and the off- site parking lot. This schedule is provided in Attachment B and the majority of vehicles were planned 115 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 to avoid the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. For the off-site parking lot, Delivery Service Provider (DSP) Personal Vehicles would arrive at the off- site parking lot in 24-vehicle waves at 9:20 AM, 9:40 AM, 10:00 AM, and 10:20 AM, depart 30 minutes later in the delivery vans to DSF5, and depart from DSF5 in the delivery vans 20 minutes later. In the evenings, the delivery vans would return starting at 7:00 PM and ending at 9:00 PM. Off- site delivery vans are encouraged to return back to the station before going back to the off-site parking lot. It should be noted that these hours are well after the weekday PM peak period between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. After returning to the delivery station, vans return to the off-site parking lot, and then DSP Personal Vehicles would depart the off-site parking lot during the same 30-minute time period. The project vehicle trips for DSF5 are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 highlights the trips avoiding the typical weekday peak hours. Project Impact on TDM Plan As mentioned in the 2015 TDM plan for 250 Utah Avenue, the TDM ordinance is meant to reduce “home-to-work” vehicle trips during the peak hours. Therefore, the trips that are subject to reduction from a TDM plan are on-site employee trips for the peak hours. The 501 S. Airport Boulevard project is not intended to increase the number of on-site employees, but rather will be a location where delivery vans and DSP personal vehicles will be parked. Therefore, the 501 S. Airport Boulevard project will not create new on-site employee trips and will not impact the TDM plan. Although, the project would not create any new on-site employee trips subject to the TDM plan, the current 2024 operations, as provided by Amazon, are slightly different than the 2021 operations as stated in the 2015 TDM plan. The following summarizes these updates: 1. The latest operations data shows a headcount of 122 on-site employees, not the 48 on-site employees mentioned in the 2015 TDM plan. Of the 122 on-site employees, they generate 92 in bound trips and 92 outbound trips. This results in an increase in daily total trips from 96 daily trips to 184 daily trips. 2. Typical Daily Operations: a. Delivery of goods to the site: the number of line-haul trucks would increase from 3 trucks to 13 trucks. b. Sortation: the number of sortation associates would increase from 40 associates to 122 associates. c. Loading of goods for delivery to customers: the number of delivery vans would be reduced from 150 delivery vans to 100 delivery vans. The description and time of operations would be updated based on the description above in the Existing Schedule of Vehicles section. 3. Trip Generation: a. Commute Trips by On-site Employees: The daily total trips will increase from 96 daily trips to 184 daily trips. b. Delivery Trips: The daily total trips will decrease from 606 daily trips to 506 daily trips. 116 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1: DSF5 Vehicle Trips Generated by Time of Day 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 48 78 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 63 38 45 7 1 0 0 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00:0000:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:0022:3023:0023:30#ofTripsTime of Day Project Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak Hours PM Peak Hours 117 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 4. TDM Program for Proposed Sortation Facility: a. Designated Employer Contact: the on-site employer contact will be Patrin Li and can be reached at lipatrin@amazon.com b. Direct Route to Transit: the nearest shuttle bus stop has been relocated from Littlefield Avenue (just south of Utah Avenue) to 380 Littlefield Avenue (northeast of the project). Conclusion Amazon is considering leasing the existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard for DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van off-site parking for its nearby Amazon fulfilment site DSF5 in South San Francisco, CA. These would not be new trips, but a relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off- site parking lot. Therefore, the 501 S Airport Boulevard project would not change the TDM plan compliance for the existing Amazon Parcel Hub at 250 Utah Avenue. This addendum also provides updated operational data to reflect the different proposed operations. Attachments Attachment A –TDM Program for 250 Utah Avenue by TJKM and dated September 23, 2015 Attachment B – Vehicle Schedule for DSF5 and the 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot 118           VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  www.TJKM.com  PLEASANTON    SAN JOSE    SANTA ROSA    OAKLAND    SACRAMENTO    FRESNO  Corporate Office: 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588    Phone: 925.463.0611   Fax: 925.463.3690   Email: tjkm@TJKM.com  DBE #40772    SBE #38780  TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM     Date: September 23, 2015    To: Rozalynne Thompson  Associate Planner  Planning Division  City of South San Francisco         From:    Colin Burgett  Senior Project Manager        Jurisdiction:    South San Francisco  Subject: TDM Program for 250 Utah Avenue  The purpose of this technical memorandum is to document the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for the proposed Amazon sortation facility at 250 Utah Avenue. TDM Ordinance The City of South San Francisco TDM Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 20.400) requires the preparation and implementation of TDM programs for all nonresidential development expected to generate 100 or more average daily trips. The specific purpose of the TDM ordinance (Chapter 20.400.001) is to:  Reduce the amount of traffic generated by new nonresidential development, and the expansion of existing nonresidential development.  Ensure that expected increases in traffic resulting from growth in employment opportunities in the City of South San Francisco will be adequately mitigated.  Reduce drive-alone commute trips during peak traffic periods by using a combination of services, incentives and facilities.  Promote the more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities and ensure that new developments are designed in ways to maximize the potential for alternative transportation usage.  Establish an ongoing monitoring and enforcement program to ensure that the desired alternative mode use percentages are achieved. The desired alternative mode use percentage, as defined by the TDM ordinance for nonresidential projects exceeding 100 average daily trips (and not requesting an FAR bonus) is 28 percent. The TDM ordinance describes typical measures to reduce “home-to-work” vehicle trips during peak travel periods, including ridesharing programs, transit incentives, bicycle and pedestrian amenities, telecommuting and compressed work weeks. 119     2    VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  Project Overview The project will occupy roughly one-fourth of an existing “Freight/Truck Terminal and Warehouse” facility at 250 Utah Avenue (see Attachment A). No exterior modifications are proposed. The proposed project will occupy approximately 75,609 square feet of space within the existing warehouse. The sortation facility will be staffed by approximately 48 employees. Delivery of goods to and from the site will be conducted by delivery service providers not employed at the site. Typical daily operations at the sortation facility will consist of the following: 1. Delivery of goods to site: Line-haul trucks will deliver goods to the site between 10 pm and 3 am. Up to three line-haul trucks will deliver to the site each night. 2. Sortation: On-site staff (“sortation associates”) will sort and sequence the goods for direct delivery to customers. Approximately 40 sortation associates will be employed on-site, divided into two shifts: o Shift A: 10 pm to 6 am o Shift B: 4 am to Noon 3. Loading of goods for delivery to customers: Delivery service providers will arrive at the site each morning between 7 am and 10 am to be loaded with goods for direct deliveries to customers. Up to 40 vans at a time will be loaded for delivery within 30-minute windows. Sortation associates will roll carts containing totes filled with packages to the awaiting vans. Up to 150 delivery vans will pick-up goods from the site each morning. After completing deliveries between 7 am and 6 pm, each delivery van will return to the site to drop-off undeliverable items and empty totes in a pre-designated area. 4. Management: approximately 6 to 8 managers will employed on site, of which roughly half will work from approximately midnight to 8 am, and half will work a daytime schedule between 8 am and 5 pm. Trip Generation Commute Trips by On-site Employees The project will generate up to 96 daily commute trips to and from the site (i.e., one inbound and one outbound “home to work” trip for each of the 48 on-site employees). A key goal of the TDM Ordinance is to reduce drive-alone commute trips during peak travel periods. As stated above, the 40 sortation associates will work from 10 PM to 6 AM, or from 4 AM to Noon. Therefore, the vast majority of commute trips generated by the project will occur outside of peak travel periods. Delivery Trips Delivery service providers will generate up to 606 daily trips to and from the site. Up to three line-haul trucks will generate up to six daily trips to and from the site (i.e., one inbound and one outbound trip by each line-haul truck). Up to 150 delivery vans will generate up to 600 daily trips to and from the site (i.e. up to two inbound and two outbound trips per day by each delivery van). 120     3    VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  TDM Program for Proposed Sortation Facility The sortation facility at 250 Utah Avenue will implement the TDM Measures described below. Figure 1 provides a site plan showing pedestrian connections to transit and the planned location of trip reduction measures within the site. 1. Carpool and Vanpool Ridematching Services. The sortation facility will designate an on-site employer contact that will be responsible for matching potential carpoolers and vanpoolers by administering a carpool/vanpool matching application. The application will match employees who may be able to carpool or vanpool. 2. Designated Employer Contact. The on-site employer contact will be Alexis Snyder, Amazon Shift Manager, and can be reached at 503- 805-4150. The City of South San Francisco will be provided with a current name and phone number of the designated on-site employer contact. The designated employer contact will administer carpool and vanpool ridematching services, the promotional programs, update information on the information boards/kiosks, and be the official contact for the administration of the annual survey and triennial report. 3. Direct Route to Transit. The existing sidewalk on Utah Avenue provides the most direct route to the nearest shuttle bus stop located on Littlefield Avenue (just south of the intersection with Utah Avenue) that is located approximately 710 feet from the main entrance. The site is served by the South San Francisco – Utah/Grand BART Shuttle that provides morning (6:30 am to 9:30 am) and afternoon (3:15 pm to 6:15 pm) half-hourly service to the South San Francisco BART Station. In addition, existing sidewalks on Utah Avenue provides access to the nearest public transit stops that are located on South Airport Boulevard. 4. Guaranteed Ride Home. Carpool, vanpool and transit riders will be provided with guaranteed rides home in emergency situations. Rides shall be provided either by a transportation service provider (taxi or rental car) or an informal policy using company vehicles/and or designated employees. 5. Information Boards/Kiosks. The designated employer contact will display the following information in a prominent location: transit routes and schedules; carpooling and vanpooling information; bicycle lanes, routes and paths and facility information; and alternative commute subsidy information. 6. Passenger Loading Zones. Designated parking spaces for carpool and vanpool drop-off will be located near the main building entrance (see Figure 1). 7. Pedestrian Connections. Sidewalks are provided on Utah Avenue, immediately bordering the site. The sortation facility will occupy an existing, developed site. No exterior modifications are proposed. 121     4    VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  8. Promotional Programs. The following promotional programs will be promoted and organized by the designated employer contact: new tenant and employee orientation packets on transportation alternatives; flyers, posters, brochures, and emails on commute alternatives; transportation fairs; Spare the Air (June — October); Rideshare Week (October); trip planning assistance-routes and maps. 9. Showers/Clothes Lockers. Lockers will be provided for all associates. An on-site shower will be provided for use by bicycle commuters. 10. Shuttle Program. The South San Francisco – Utah/Grand BART shuttle bus service provides service to the site during the typical morning (6:30-9:30 am) and afternoon (3:15 to 6:15 pm) commute periods. The shuttle bus stop is located adjacent to the site on Littlefield Avenue (see Figure 1). The on-site employer contact will manage participation in the shuttle service. 11. Transportation Management Association (TMA). The employee transportation coordinator will participate in the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance that provides ongoing support for alternative commute programs. The employee transportation coordinator will work with the Alliance to create a transportation action plan. 12. Bicycle Parking, Long-Term. Bicycle racks to accommodate up to 10 bicycles will be installed immediately adjacent to the main entrance (see Figure 1). On-site security and CCTV cameras will oversee the bicycle racks. The facility operator will monitor usage and add additional racks if necessary to accommodate demand. 13. Bicycle Parking, Short-Term. Long-term bicycle parking will be provided for up to four bicycles within a secure bicycle storage facility within the site. 14. Free Parking for Carpools and Vanpools. There will be no charge for parking on-site. Parking spaces will be allocated for carpool and vanpool vehicles as shown on Figure 1. 15. Annual Survey An annual survey will be prepared and administered by the designated employee contact. The survey will be administered to on-site employees. Participants will be asked to describe their typical mode of travel to and from the site. The intent of the survey will be determine the percentage of employee “home-to-work” trips that are made by automobile and alternative modes. 122 LITTLEFIELD AVE.UTAH AVE.OFFICEWAREHOUSE290' 260' 16,704 SF58,904 SFLITTLEFIELD AVE.Pedestrian Path to TransitExisting Shuttle Bus StopCarpool/Vanpool Drop-offand LoadingShort-TermBike ParkingPedestrian EntrancePreferential Parking forCarpools/VanpoolsPedestrian Path toSamTrans Bus Stopson Airport Blvd.Figure 1072-045Trip Reduction ElementsLEGENDExisting SidewalkNInformation Kiosk(Lunch Room)On-Site Transit Pass SalesEmployee Shower andLocker FacilitiesLong-Term Bike Parking123           VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  www.TJKM.com  PLEASANTON    SAN JOSE    SANTA ROSA    OAKLAND    SACRAMENTO    FRESNO  Corporate Office: 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588    Phone: 925.463.0611   Fax: 925.463.3690   Email: tjkm@TJKM.com  DBE #40772    SBE #38780  Attachment A – Information Requested by City To determine the number of required parking spaces for motor vehicles and bicycles, City staff requested the following information (items 1 through 6 below). Approximately 96 on-site motor vehicle parking spaces are provided immediately adjacent to the portion of the warehouse that will be occupied by the proposed sortation facility. The proposed sortation facility will employ 48 on-site employees. 1. Description of the type of freight to be distributed The proposed project is an Amazon sortation facility. Typical consumer goods ordered by Amazon customers will be sorted on-site prior to pick-up by delivery service providers. 2. Size of trucks and shipping containers. Line-haul truck deliveries to the site will be made by typical semi-trucks, roughly 60 feet in length. Line- haul deliveries to the site will occur between 10 pm and 3 am. Pick-up of goods from the site for direct delivery to customers will be carried out by delivery service providers utilizing small delivery vans, roughly 20 feet in length. Loading of delivery vans will occur between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. 3. Number and schedule of deliveries. Line-haul trucks will deliver goods to the site between 10 pm and 3 am. Up to three line-haul trucks will deliver to the site each night. Delivery service providers will arrive at the site each morning between 7 am and 10 am to be loaded with goods for direct deliveries to customers. Up to 40 vans at a time will be loaded for delivery within 30-minute windows. Sortation associates will roll carts containing totes filled with packages to the awaiting vans. Up to 150 delivery vans will pick-up goods from the site each morning. After completing deliveries between 7 am and 6 pm, each delivery van will return to the site to drop-off undeliverable items and empty totes in a pre-designated area. 4. Amount and duration of storage. Goods will be delivered by line-haul trucks between 10 pm and 3 am, sorted by on-site staff, and picked- up by delivery service providers between 7 am and 10 am. Therefore goods will typically be on-site for 4 to 12 hours. 5. Loading and unloading procedures. Delivery vans will be loaded within the warehouse (see Figure 5) between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. Each Delivery Service Provider will be given a 30 minute load window (e.g. 0700-0730, 0730-0800, etc.) to load their vans. Drivers will enter into the drive-in door and line up in pre-designated loading spaces. There will be approximately a total of 18 loading spaces for the vans inside the delivery 124         VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY  station. Drivers will shut off their vehicles, open the van doors while sortation associates roll route carts containing totes filled with packages to the awaiting drivers. Drivers will place totes into their vans and when directed drive out of and depart from the delivery station. Once they finish their delivery route drivers will come back to the delivery station, drive into the station and return their empty totes with any undeliverable packages in a pre-designated area. Temporary Loading Plan (prior to HVAC equipment and CO monitoring installation) – Each Delivery Service Provider will be given a 30 minute load window (e.g. 07:00-07:30 AM, 07:30-08:00 AM, etc.) to load their vans. Drivers will back into open dock doors where sortation associates will hand totes filled with packages to the awaiting drivers. Drivers will place totes into their vans and when complete depart from the delivery station. Once they finish their delivery route drivers will come back to the delivery station, return their empty totes with any undeliverable packages in an open dock door. 6. Circulation plan. As described in item #2 above, peak activity will occur when delivery vans are loaded between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. During that time period, approximately 28 employees will be on-site (as Shift A will have finished their shift by 6 am). Figure 2 shows the on-site circulation plan for delivery vans accessing the designated loading areas within the warehouse. The loading procedures for delivery are described in #5 above – as noted, each Delivery Service Provider will be given a 30-minute window to load their vans within the warehouse. Delivery service providers will be discouraged from arriving early, but in the event that a van driver arrives early for their scheduled loading appointment, any early-arriving vans will wait in designated areas as shown on Figure 2. 125 LITTLEFIELD AVE.UTAH AVE.OFFICEWAREHOUSE290' 260' 16,704 SF58,904 SFLITTLEFIELD AVE.WWLWLFigure 2072-045Circulation PlanLEGENDInbound Van RouteOutbound Van RouteWaiting Area if Vans Arrive EarlyVan Loading AreaN126 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 01:30 52 0 52 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 53 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 12 0 12 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 06:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 25 0 25 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 24 24 48 0 0 0 24 25 49 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 96 0 0 0 48 48 96 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 28 0 0 0 4 24 28 11:30 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 4 7 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 52 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 52 13:00 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 13:30 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 29 0 29 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 23 12 12 24 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 0 29 29 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 13 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 14 18:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 19:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 30 6 36 0 0 0 31 6 37 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 24 30 54 0 0 0 24 31 55 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 24 56 0 0 0 32 24 56 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 32 39 0 0 0 8 32 40 21:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 8 0 0 0 1 8 9 22:00 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 13 22:30 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 92 92 184 13 13 26 0 0 0 200 200 400 40 40 80 345 345 690 DSA5 - Station Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 127 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 008:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 009:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 24 24 0 0 0 24 24 48 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 48 48 0 0 0 30 48 78 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 24 24 0 0 0 14 24 38 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 4 5 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 10 16 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 33 30 0 30 0 0 0 30 33 63 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 24 0 24 0 0 0 24 14 38 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 32 0 32 0 0 0 32 13 45 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 7 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 150 100 100 200 0 0 0 175 175 350 DSF5 - Off-Site Parking Lot Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 128 1 UPDATED TRANSPORTATION DEM AND MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST FOR 250 UTAH AVENUE, SOUTH SF At Amazon, we focus on being the most customer-centric company in the world. Amazon Logistics (“AMZL”) specializes in delivery of customer orders from delivery stations, which power the last mile of our customer order process and help speed-up deliveries for customers. Our growth in the Bay Area is the result of an outstanding workforce, strong local support, and incredible customers. Our associates and customers in this region are also your residents, and we want to ensure we are being good neighbors. Amazon’s existing delivery station at 250 Utah Avenue has been operational since 2016. In 2016, a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program was provided and implemented by Amazon. The original TDM and update is included as part of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) submittal. In October 2022, the City adopted its Transportation Analysis Guidelines requiring a TDM checklist for new development projects generating greater than 100 daily trips. Although we believe Amazon is not required to provide a TDM Checklist because the Project is not considered a new development and will not result in a net new generation of trips, Amazon intends to comply with the enclosed Tier 2 TDM Checklist. Amazon is able to achieve 31 out of the 30 points required for Tier 2 projects: Tier 2 TDM Requirements Required Measures Provided • 50% Transit Pass Subsidies and Pre-Tax Transit Benefits • Participation in Commute.org Programs (5 points) • Carpool/Vanpool Programs and Parking (3 points) • Bicycle Storage and Lockers (1 point)1 • Designated TDM Coordinator (1 point) • Bicycle and Pedestrian-Oriented Site Access (1 point) • Encourage Telecommuting & Flexible Work Schedules (1 point) 1 While bicycle storage and lockers are provided, showers cannot be accommodated within the existing build of the delivery station facility. The facility is required to provide a mandated break room and cafeteria for associates, and cannot provide showers without impacting these required areas. Therefore, 1 point is allocated instead of the required 2 for this measure. 129 2 Optional Measures Provided • Enhanced Shuttle Commitment (10 points) • Transit Capital Improvements (1 point)3 • Bicycle Repair Station (1) While not explicitly a part of the City’s Tier 2 TDM Checklist, Amazon has also instituted the following TDM measures in accordance with its 2016 TDM Program: • Direct Route to Transit • Guaranteed Ride Homes • Information Boards/Kiosks • Passenger Loading Zones • Pedestrian Connections • Promotional Programs • Annual Survey 3 As part of the Project, Amazon will propose wayfinding signage in accordance with § 20.400.004 of the City’s Ordinance. 130 19 TDM Checklist - 250 Utah (Updated) Tier 2 projects are subject to implementing a list of TDM measures selected from those identified by the City in its TDM Ordinance. Each individual measure is worth a set number of ‘points’; Tier 2 projects must achieve 30 points, including several required measures. An annual self-certification form is required for the first five years after occupancy. Table 5: Tier 2 TDM Requirements Type TDM Measure (*Description Required as Attachment) Eligible Points Proposed Project Points Required Measures (20 Points) 50% Transit Pass Subsidies and Pre-Tax Transit Benefits 7 Participation in Commute.org Programs 5 Carpool/ Vanpool Programs and Parking 3 Bicycle Storage, Showers, and Lockers 2 Designated TDM Coordinator 1 Bicycle and Pedestrian-Oriented Site Access 1 Encourage Telecommuting & Flexible Work Schedules 1 Optional Measures (Description Required as Attachment) Paid Parking or Parking Cash-Out 10 Enhanced Shuttle Commitment* 10 Fully Subsidized Transit Passes 8 Affordable Housing 6 Active Transportation Gap Closure* Up to 6 Transit Capital Improvements* Up to 6 Reduced Parking Up to 5 On-Site Pedestrian-Oriented Amenities 3 Bikeshare Program Participation 3 Shared Parking Approach 2 Cash Incentives1 2 On-Site Carshare 2 Active Transportation Subsidies 1 Increased Bicycle Parking (>50% Greater than City Code) 1 Bicycle Repair Station 1 Requirements Tier 2 Projects 30 The following guidance is suggested for the calculation of variable point totals: •Active Transportation Gap Closure: 2 point for addressing missing sidewalks or signage/striping changes for crosswalk or bike lane gaps; 4 points for dedicating additional space for pedestrian or bicycle facilities; 6 points for major gap closure near transit station •Transit Capital Improvements: 2 point for bus shelter at existing stop; 4 points for new bus bulb with shelter (or equivalent bus improvements); 6 points for bus-only lane 3 1 1 1 10 5 1 1 1 31 7 131 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 May 16, 2024 Ms. Seema Adina Senior Entitlements Manager Amazon (transmitted via email) RE:Delivery Station DFA5 - TDM Compliance Memorandum – 400 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco, CA Dear Ms. Adina: The City of South San Francisco (City) has recently requested that Amazon determine if the off-site parking lot project at 501 S. Airport Boulevard in South San Francisco, CA (project) is consistent with the transportation demand management (TDM) program developed for the Amazon Parcel Hub at 400 Littlefield Avenue. Amazon has requested Kimley-Horn’s assistance in determining this compliance. This memorandum summarizes the project’s compliance with the TDM prepared at 400 Littlefield Avenue. Background CURRENT TDM PLAN A TDM plan has been prepared for the Amazon Parcel Hub at 400 Littlefield Avenue by NV5 in April 2021 (see Attachment A). The following is a summary of the 2021 TDM plan: · Target TDM trip reduction is 28 percent. · Project description: o Delivery stations operate 24/7 to support delivery of packages between 10:30 AM and 9:00 PM. o There will be 83 on-site employees, resulting in an estimated 166 daily total trips. These are the trips subject to the TDM strategies. All other trip types, including tractor trailers, delivery vans, or private delivery cars, are not subject to the TDM requirement. · A 28 percent reduction results in 23 employees needing to commute by other means than driving alone. · Summary of existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infrastructure and access for the project. o Estimated that only 10 employees can use transit due to off-peak work schedules. · TDM Strategies: o Carpool and Vanpool Ride-matching Services o Designated Employer Contact o Direct Route to Transit o Informational Kiosk o Passenger Loading Zones 132 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 o Pedestrian Connections o Promotional Items o Shuttle Program o Transportation Management Association o Bicycle Parking, Short-term o Bicycle Parking, Long-term o Free Parking for Carpools and Vanpools o Annual Survey o Guaranteed Ride Home o Other: Shift schedules outside of typical weekday AM and PM peak periods · TDM Effectiveness: o An estimate 10 employees may choose an alternative mode of transportation. o Carpool/vanpool/TMA programs could encourage as much as 20% of employees to use these modes. This would affect 18 employees. o The most impactful TDM measure to reduce potential impact on area congestion is from the employment shifts resulting in commutes outside of the typical weekday AM and PM peak periods. There will be zero (0) peak hour trips. EXISTING OPERATIONS Amazon has an existing delivery station in South San Francisco: DFA5 at 400 Littlefield Avenue. This site currently utilizes one off-site parking lot located at 101 Terminal Court, South San Francisco, CA. That existing off-site parking lot has approximately 1,300 available parking spaces, but is only allocated 130 parking spaces. On average, only 100 parking spaces are used for Delivery Service Provider (DSP) Personal Vehicles and delivery vans on a typical day for the DFA5 Station. The remaining spaces are either used by the existing DSF5 delivery station at 250 A Utah Avenue in South San Francisco, or remain unoccupied. EXISTING SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES Amazon provided a schedule of vehicles entering and exiting the existing delivery station and the off- site parking lot. This schedule is provided in Attachment B and the majority of vehicles were planned to avoid the typical AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. For the on-site parking lot, DSP Personal Vehicles would arrive at DFA5 in 25- vehicle waves at 9:20 AM, 9:50 AM, and 10:50 AM and the vans would depart from the station at 10:10 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:30 AM. For the off-site parking lot, DSP Personal Vehicles would arrive at the off-site parking lot in 25-vehicle waves at 10:00 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:00 AM, depart 30 minutes later in the delivery vans to DFA5, and depart from DFA5 in the delivery vans 20 minutes later. In the evenings, the delivery vans would return starting at 7:00 PM and ending at 9:00 PM. Off- site delivery vans are encouraged to return back to the station before going back to the off-site parking lot. It should be noted that these hours are well after the weekday PM peak period between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. After returning to the delivery station, vans return to the off-site parking lot, and then DSP Personal Vehicles would depart the off-site parking lot during the same 30-minute time period. The project vehicle trips for DFA5 are shown in Figure 1. 133 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1: DFA5 Vehicle Trips Generated by Time of Day 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 37 53 34 14 0 0 0 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 00:0000:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:0022:3023:0023:30#ofTripsTime of Day Project Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak PM Peak Hours 134 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Figure 1 highlights the trips avoiding the typical weekday peak hours. Project Impact on TDM Plan As mentioned in the 2021 TDM plan for 400 Littlefield Avenue, the only trips that are subject to reduction from a TDM plan are on-site employee trips. The 501 S. Airport Boulevard project is not intended to increase the number of on-site employees, but rather will be a location where delivery vans and DSP personal vehicles will be parked. Therefore, the 501 S. Airport Boulevard project will not create new on-site employee trips and will not impact the TDM plan. Although, the project would not create any new on-site employee trips subject to the TDM plan, the current 2024 operations, as provided by Amazon, are slightly different than the 2021 operations as stated in the 2021 TDM plan. The following summarizes these updates: 1. The latest operations data shows a headcount of 120 on-site employees, not the 83 on-site employees mentioned in the 2021 TDM plan. Of the 120 on-site employees, they generate 90 in bound trips and 90 outbound trips. This results in an increase in daily total trips from 166 daily trips to 180 daily trips. 2. An overall trip reduction of 28 percent would equate to 25 employees that would need to commute by other means that driving alone. This is an increase from 23 employees. Conclusion Amazon is considering leasing the existing lot at 501 S Airport Boulevard for DSP Personal Vehicle and delivery van off-site parking for its nearby Amazon fulfilment site DFA5 in South San Francisco, CA. These would not be new trips, but a relocation of existing trips from the 101 Terminal Court off- site parking lot. Therefore, the 501 S Airport Boulevard project would not change the TDM plan compliance for the existing Amazon Parcel Hub at 400 Littlefield Avenue. This addendum also provides updated operational data to reflect the slightly different proposed operations. 135 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925 398 4840 Attachments Attachment A –Transportation Demand Management Program for 400 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco by NV5 and dated April 5, 2021 Attachment B – Vehicle Schedule for DFA5 and the 501 S Airport Boulevard Parking Lot 136 1255 Canton Street | Suite G | Roswell, GA 30075 | www.NV5.com | Office 678.796.3600 2025 Gateway Place | Suite 238 | San Jose, CA 30075 | www.NV5.com | Office 408.392.7200 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENERGY - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: City of South San Francisco From: John Karnowski, PTOE, AICP (john.karnowski@NV5.com) Date: April 5, 2021 Re: Transportation Demand Management Program for 400 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco The following represents the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan for Amazon of the existing above referenced industrial warehouse. The plan is in accordance with South San Francisco Municipal Code 20.400. The site is located at 400 Littlefield Avenue. The intended use is a package delivery station, as known as a “last-mile delivery center.” TDM PROVISIONS The City of South San Francisco requires a TDM program for non-residential development that will generate 100 or more daily trips. The target of the TDM is a trip reduction of 28 percent. PROJECT TRAFFIC The proposed delivery station will occupy the existing building at 400 Littlefield Avenue – see Appendix B for a parking and circulation plan. No changes to the exterior of the building are anticipated. Van loading, dispatch, and most of the van parking will be inside of the building. Delivery stations are the last mile connection between Amazon’s fulfillment process and their customers. Packages are transported to delivery stations via line-haul trucks from neighboring Amazon fulfillment and sortation centers and are further sorted, picked, and loaded into delivery vehicles. Delivery stations operate 24/7 to support delivery of packages to customer locations between 10:30 AM and 9:00 PM. At the subject facility, there will be 83 on-site employees. The employee shift information is shown in the table to the right. The trips that are subject to reduction via transportation demand management strategies are on-site employee trips. All other traffic is delivery related – either tractor trailers, delivery vans, or private delivery cars. The employee trip generation is shown in the Table 1. The site will generate a total of 166 employee commute trips per day, exclusive of TDM measures. The total site generation, including delivery operations and line-haul activity is shown in Appendix B. One goal of the TDM Ordinance is to reduce single-passenger commute trips during the peak hours – 7-9a and 4-6p. None of the employee shifts coincide with the peak hours. Another goal is to reduce overall non- residential trips. Lastly, if there are additional trips associated with the site, any impacts should be mitigated. Since the goal is to reduce overall trips by 28%, 23 employees would need to commute by some other means than driving alone. 137 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 2 of 8 Table 1. Employee Trip Generation TRANSPORTATION NETWORK The area around the site is well served by sidewalks. There are no exclusive bike lanes on the adjacent streets, but they are marked for shared bike travel. The surrounding land uses are primarily industrial in nature with few residential units. There are two bus stops near the site: one on Littlefield Avenue near Lawrence Avenue and one on Kimball Way near East Grand Avenue. The nearest stop on Littlefield Avenue is shown in the image below. 138 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 3 of 8 It is a 22-minute walk to the South San Francisco Caltrain station. The transit systems in the area include BART Shuttle, Ferry Shuttle, and Caltrain Shuttle. The BART Shuttle operates weekdays from 6:05a-9:50a and 3:25p- 6:55p with 60-minute headways and no weekend service. Monthly passes are $50. The Ferry Shuttle is free and open to the public. The Caltrain Shuttle operates weekdays from 6:20a to 10:22a and 2:48p to 7:03p on 30-minute headways but not on the weekends. The Caltrain Shuttle is $50 per month. Because of the times of operation and the employee shift structure of the tenant, transit service is not readily available to many of the on-site workers. Only 10 on-site employees could take transit. It is possible that some people will choose to take transit if encouraged but based on the location of the site, realistically this number is likely no more than 5 employees. Regionally, carpools and vanpools mode share is 9.6% (source: U.S. Census Bureau Community Survey). There are opportunities to connect employees with regional carpool/vanpool programs. As stated before, most employees begin their shifts in the early morning hour and are not hampered by traffic getting to work. Their return trips are in the middle of the day when traffic congestion is not as severe as during the peak hours. While some may carpool to avoid daytime traffic congestion, that number is not likely to be greater than the regional average of about 10% without significant incentives. 139 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 4 of 8 TDM PROGRAM With the implementation of the following TDM strategies, the site will achieve some reduction in single- passenger automobile trips and will have no commuter traffic during the peak hours: 1. Carpool and Vanpool Ride-matching Services: Amazon will designate its on-site operations manager as the employee contact that will be responsible for matching potential carpool and vanpool drivers and riders via an application system. 2. Designated Employer Contact: The on-site operations manager name and phone number will be provided to the City at the time it is known. The manager will be the primary contact for carpool and vanpool matching, and on-site communications related to auto-reduction measures. 3. Direct Route to Transit: The nearest bus stop is less than 100 yards south of the building on Littlefield Avenue. The area is served by sidewalk. 4. Informational Kiosk: The on-site manager will display the following information in a prominent location: transit routes and schedules, carpool and vanpool information, bicycle routes and facility information, and any corporate subsidy information. 5. Passenger Loading Zones: A loading zone will be established and identified for carpool/vanpool drop offs near the front of the building. (See Appendix B Site Plan) 140 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 5 of 8 6. Pedestrian Connections: The area between the employee entrance and the street will be well lit to provide a safe and inviting path. (See Appendix B Site Plan) 7. Promotional Items: The informational kiosk will contain the following items: a new employee packet with transit information, rideshare options, and trip planning assistance information; up-to-date transit route maps and schedules for employee use; and commute alternatives. 8. Shuttle Program: The South San Francisco shuttle bus provides service to the site. There are two stops nearby. The on-site operations manager will manage participation in the shuttle service. 9. Transportation Management Association (TMA): The on-site operations manager will participate in the TMA that provides for ongoing support for commute alternatives. 10. Bicycle Parking, Short Term: Short-term bicycle accommodations will be made on site. These include bike racks to support four (4) bikes, security, and CCTV cameras. Accommodations includes bike parking within a locked and controlled area, lockers, security cameras, and bike racks. Facilities will be within 75 feet of the main entrance to the building. The on-site operations manager will assess the bike storage needs and add more racks, if needed. (See Appendix B Site Plan) 11. Bicycle Parking, Long Term: Long-term bicycle accommodations will be provided for up to ten (10) bicycles within a secure storage area on site. (See Appendix B Site Plan) 12. Free Parking for Carpools and Vanpools: There will be parking spaces allocated for carpool and vanpool vehicles near the entrance to the building. A minimum of four spaces will be provided and more designated if additional space is needed. (See Appendix B Site Plan) 13. Annual Survey: The on-site operations manager will prepare and administer a survey each year to on-site employees to gauge the participation rate within the facility and to identify strategies to further reduce single-passenger automobile travel. 14. Guaranteed Ride Home: In the event that an employee rides transit or uses a carpool/vanpool and is unable to get home at the scheduled time (e.g., family emergency, unavailable carpool driver, working late, etc.), Amazon will provide a guaranteed ride home in the form of a car service or taxi. 15. Other: The shift schedules will be such that zero employees are expected to arrive or depart the site during the peak hours (7-9a, 4-6p). ANALYSIS OF TDM PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS The effectiveness of the preceding measures is highly dependent on the commute patterns of the employees and their respective work shifts. As stated before, only 10 employees could utilize transit. They may access the South San Francisco Caltrans Station that is one mile away via the shuttle bus (#8), bike (#10, #11) or walking (#3). Information on bus and train schedules will be provided (#2, #4, #7). With these incentives, we estimate that up to ten (10) employees may choose an alternative mode of transportation. Carpool and vanpools are most attractive to employees who wish to avoid sitting alone during rush hours in their cars. They can save gas and other transportation costs. However, because most of the employees will work non-traditional hours, they are not likely to fall into the typical carpool/vanpool user category. Incentives such as ride-matching (#1, #4) and on-site parking/drop-off accommodations (#5, #12) along with outreach and encouragement by site management (#9, #13) could reduce the number of single-occupant vehicles. The guaranteed ride home program (#14) will provide employees with a viable incentive to driving alone as it removes the idea of being stranded at work if transit or their carpool is unavailable for some reason. While the average carpool rate in the Bay Area is a little less than 10%, the carpool/vanpool/TMA programs could encourage as much as 20% of the employees to use these modes. This would affect 18 employees and help reach the overall goal of 28% or more reduction in daily trips. 141 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 6 of 8 The most impactful TDM measure to reduce the site’s potential impact on area congestion is through the adjustment of the employee shifts (#16). There will be no peak hour trips. There will be 12 outbound trips just after 6:00 PM, which a very low impact. The goal of reducing peak hour impacts will be achieved. TDM PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION The TDM program will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Site Operations Manager. If specific elements are deficient or ineffectual, they will be improved or eliminated in favor of other measures. 142 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 7 of 8 Attachment A: Traffic Schedule w/o TDM 143 DFA5 – 400 Littlefield Ave, South San Francisco, CA TDM PROGRAM Page 8 of 8 Attachment B: Parking and Circulation Plan 144 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01:30 52 0 52 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 1 53 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:30 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 50 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 51 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 26 26 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 50 25 75 0 0 0 75 25 100 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 50 50 11:30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 50 75 0 0 0 28 50 78 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 52 13:00 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 13:30 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 23 11 13 24 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 0 28 28 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 13 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 14 18:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 11 5 16 0 0 0 11 10 21 19:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 10 55 27 82 0 0 0 56 37 93 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 34 34 38 19 57 0 0 0 38 53 91 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 42 21 63 0 0 0 42 34 77 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 12 12 5 2 7 0 0 0 6 14 20 21:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 22:00 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 22:30 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 90 90 180 11 11 22 75 75 150 225 225 450 40 40 80 441 438 879 DFA5 - Station Associates Trucks DSP Vans Flex TotalDSP Drivers 1The 450 van trips generated by the DFA5 Station include 150 van trips generated from the off-site parking lot. 1 145 Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 50 0 25 25 0 0 0 50 25 75 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 25 25 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 25 25 0 0 0 25 25 50 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 10 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 10 37 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 19 0 19 0 0 0 19 34 53 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 21 0 21 0 0 0 21 13 34 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 12 14 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 150 75 75 150 0 0 0 150 150 300 DFA5 - Off-Site Parking Associates Trucks DSP Drivers DSP Vans Flex Total 146 1 UPDATED TRANSPORTATION DEM AND MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST FOR 400 LIT TLE FIELD AVE, SOUTH SF At Amazon, we focus on being the most customer-centric company in the world. Amazon Logistics (“AMZL”) specializes in delivery of customer orders from delivery stations, which power the last mile of our customer order process and help speed-up deliveries for customers. Our growth in the Bay Area is the result of an outstanding workforce, strong local support, and incredible customers. Our associates and customers in this region are also your residents, and we want to ensure we are being good neighbors. Amazon’s existing delivery station at 400 Littlefield Ave has been operational since 2020. In 2020, a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program was provided and implemented by Amazon. The original TDM and update is included as part of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) submittal. In October 2022, the City adopted its Transportation Analysis Guidelines requiring a TDM checklist for new development projects generating greater than 100 daily trips. Although we believe Amazon is not required to provide a TDM Checklist because the Project is not considered a new development and it will not result in a net new generation of trips, Amazon intends to comply with the enclosed Tier 2 TDM Checklist. Amazon is able to achieve 31 out of the 30 points required for Tier 2 projects: Tier 2 TDM Requirements Required Measures Provided • 50% Transit Pass Subsidies and Pre-Tax Transit Benefits2 • Participation in Commute.org Programs (5 points) • Carpool/Vanpool Programs and Parking (3 points) • Bicycle Storage and Lockers. (1 point)1 • Designated TDM Coordinator (1 point) • Bicycle and Pedestrian-Oriented Site Access (1 point) • Encourage Telecommuting & Flexible Work Schedules (1 point) 1 While bicycle storage and lockers are provided, showers cannot be accommodated within the existing build of the delivery station facility. The facility is required to provide a mandated break room and cafeteria for associates, and cannot provide showers without impacting these required areas. Therefore, 1 point is allocated instead of the required 2 for this measure. 147 2 Optional Measures Provided • Enhanced Shuttle Commitment (10 points) • Transit Capital Improvements (1 point)3 • Bicycle Repair Station (1 point) While not explicitly a part of the City’s Tier 2 TDM Checklist, Amazon has also instituted the following TDM measures in accordance with its 2020 TDM Program: • Direct Route to Transit • Guaranteed Ride Homes • Information Boards/Kiosks • Passenger Loading Zones • Pedestrian Connections • Promotional Programs • Annual Survey 3 As part of the Project, Amazon will propose wayfinding signage in accordance with § 20.400.004 of the City’s Ordinance. 148 19 TDM Checklist - 400 Littlefield (Updated) Tier 2 projects are subject to implementing a list of TDM measures selected from those identified by the City in its TDM Ordinance. Each individual measure is worth a set number of ‘points’; Tier 2 projects must achieve 30 points, including several required measures. An annual self-certification form is required for the first five years after occupancy. Table 5: Tier 2 TDM Requirements Type TDM Measure (*Description Required as Attachment) Eligible Points Proposed Project Points Required Measures (20 Points) 50% Transit Pass Subsidies and Pre-Tax Transit Benefits 7 Participation in Commute.org Programs 5 Carpool/ Vanpool Programs and Parking 3 Bicycle Storage, Showers, and Lockers 2 Designated TDM Coordinator 1 Bicycle and Pedestrian-Oriented Site Access 1 Encourage Telecommuting & Flexible Work Schedules 1 Optional Measures (Description Required as Attachment) Paid Parking or Parking Cash-Out 10 Enhanced Shuttle Commitment* 10 Fully Subsidized Transit Passes 8 Affordable Housing 6 Active Transportation Gap Closure* Up to 6 Transit Capital Improvements* Up to 6 Reduced Parking Up to 5 On-Site Pedestrian-Oriented Amenities 3 Bikeshare Program Participation 3 Shared Parking Approach 2 Cash Incentives1 2 On-Site Carshare 2 Active Transportation Subsidies 1 Increased Bicycle Parking (>50% Greater than City Code) 1 Bicycle Repair Station 1 Requirements Tier 2 Projects 30 The following guidance is suggested for the calculation of variable point totals: •Active Transportation Gap Closure: 2 point for addressing missing sidewalks or signage/striping changes for crosswalk or bike lane gaps; 4 points for dedicating additional space for pedestrian or bicycle facilities; 6 points for major gap closure near transit station •Transit Capital Improvements: 2 point for bus shelter at existing stop; 4 points for new bus bulb with shelter (or equivalent bus improvements); 6 points for bus-only lane 5 3 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 31 7 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-775 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding a request for approval of a Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP)for Celeste Apartments,an existing multi-family residential development located at 401 Cypress Avenue in the Downtown Transit Core Zoning District (DTC)in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC),and that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Christy Usher, Senior Planner) MOTION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Move to determine the project is exempt from CEQA. 2.Move to approve the entitlements subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1.Determine the proposed Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP)is categorically exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),Class 1,Section 15301 Existing Facilities, and 2.Approval of the PMMP subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT OVERVIEW In the fall of 2018,the Planning Commission (September 2018)and City Council (November 2018) respectively recommended approval for and approved the entitlements for a new seven to eight-story,195 unit multi-family residential development located at 401 Cypress Avenue at the corner of Miller Avenue and Cypress Avenue (aka Cadance Phase 2,now renamed “Celeste”Apartments).Construction was completed earlier this year, and the units are currently for rent. The multi-family development is within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP)Area and was designed and constructed as the second phase of the Cadence Project,which was originally approved in 2016. Both residential projects were designed as transit-oriented development and include pedestrian and bicycle amenities to encourage residents to utilize the Caltrain station and other multi-modal transportation options. Project Description The applicant,Sares Regis Group of Northern California,has submitted a proposal a Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP)for Celeste Apartments,requesting a 100%unbundled parking ratio.Specifically,the Celeste project was approved in 2018 with a maximum of 50%unbundled parking ratio,which was consistent with the City’s zoning code at the time.Unbundled parking allows for parking spaces to be rented to tenants of the apartments separately from their respective residential units.In 2022,when the City adopted the Shape SSF General Plan,the implementing Zoning Ordinance Amendment included a modification to South San Francisco City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™156 File #:24-775 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. General Plan,the implementing Zoning Ordinance Amendment included a modification to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC)Section 20.330.005(B)(2)to allow up to 100%of parking spaces for market-rate units to be unbundled,subject to approval of a PMMP by the Planning Commission.Parking for deed-restricted rental units may be unbundled at the same prorated cost as the units (i.e.,a 50%unbundling discount for a unit at 50% area median income). The applicant is proposing to unbundle parking for all of the market rate units,and has submitted a parking management and monitoring plan for Planning Commission review (Attachment 3 to this staff report).Celeste Apartments was approved prior to the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance for rental units;therefore,the project was approved in 2018 without the requirement for affordable units.Since 2018,the City has adopted affordable housing requirements for rental units. Unbundled parking means separating the cost of parking from residential leases and allowing residents to choose whether or not to lease a parking space.With this approach those tenants without a vehicle would not be required to pay for parking that they do not want or need.This approach would free up parking for those tenants that require a space and are willing to pay for it.Unbundling residential parking costs from the cost of housing can reduce tenant vehicle ownership and parking demand and can be implemented on a month-to-month lease basis.With a lease,residents receive a monthly bill showing how much they are spending on a parking space and have the option to give up the space if they no longer need it. Circulation and Parking Celeste Apartments includes two levels of parking within a parking structure,with a total of 231 parking spaces for residents.The first garage level contains 97 parking spaces,including three spaces accessible per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)and Building Code requirements,and the second garage level includes 128 spaces, including an additional two accessible spaces.The project parking also includes 18 electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces,with the ability to provide more as need increases.The residential parking levels are secure, accessed with a card or key fob.A designated space for loading for residential deliveries and move-in/move-out is located on Miller Avenue.Garbage removal and recycling pick-up service is provided from Tamarack Lane. Also provided for tenants are two bike rooms for bike parking (total of 70 spaces),and a charging station for electric bikes.The project provides 24 publicly-accessible spaces in bike racks located on both Cypress and Miller Avenues. Entitlements Request The entitlements request for this project includes: ·A Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP) ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The project site is located within the Downtown Transit Core Zoning District (DTC).Section 20.090.001 of the Zoning Ordinance contains this description and purpose of the district: ·Support the revitalization of Downtown South San Francisco and the area around the South San Francisco Caltrain Station to a vibrant and successful community resource and a source of local pride; ·Promote new residential,mixed-use and employment uses so as to add a "critical mass"of businessCity of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™157 File #:24-775 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. ·Promote new residential,mixed-use and employment uses so as to add a "critical mass"of business patrons and residents in close proximity to the Downtown,while maintaining a consistent scale and character; ·Offer the opportunity for locating high intensity residential and employment uses in immediate proximity to the Caltrain Station; ·Focus new improvements on Grand Avenue to return this historic corridor to once again being the focus of the community; ·Encourage retention of existing and local businesses to the Downtown and protect existing historic building fabric; ·Support pedestrian and bicycle throughout the Downtown,to transit,and to nearby employment and mixed-use areas; and ·Provide a framework for community benefits that address the needs of existing and future Downtown residents. This project is providing flexibility in parking options for an existing high-density transit-oriented development, and is consistent with the uses and intent of the DTC zoning district. Parking Requirements The number of required parking spaces for different land uses is regulated by SSFMC Section 20.330.004 (Required On-Site Parking Spaces);no off-street parking is required for any use located within a Transit Station Area.A Transit Station Area is a half-mile radius from any of the following:(a)Major transit stops;(b)Major transit stops included in an applicable regional transportation plan;(c)A transit corridor with a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.The project site is located in a Transit Station Area (including but not limited to the Caltrain station),therefore,no minimum parking is required.However,the applicant constructed a total of 231 residential parking spaces,1.18 spaces per residential unit, within the parking garage. Per SSFMC Section 20.330.005(B)(2)(Unbundled Parking from Residential Uses,Rental Apartment Developments),all the provided parking for units that are not deed-restricted affordable units may be unbundled,subject to approval of a parking management and monitoring plan by the Planning Commission. The applicant is proposing to unbundle parking for all of the market rate units,and has submitted a parking management and monitoring plan for Planning Commission review (Attachment 3 to this staff report). GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The General Plan Land Use Designation for the project site is Downtown Transit Core,which is consistent with the DTC zoning district.The Downtown Transit Core land use designation is envisioned as higher-density residential area with a variety of multifamily housing choices (maximum density of 180 dwelling units /acre). The unbundled parking application at Celeste Apartments is consistent with the Downtown Transit Core land use designation, and implements many General Plan goals and policies: GOAL LU-1 Create complete neighborhoods,where residents can access most of their every day needs within a short walk,bike or transit trip.To encourage residents to live healthy lifestyle reduce dependance onCity of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™158 File #:24-775 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. a short walk,bike or transit trip.To encourage residents to live healthy lifestyle reduce dependance on automobiles,and bolster pedestrian activity and community vibrancy by providing walkable access to services and amenities. The project site is located within the Downtown Sub-Area,which promotes new residential,mixed use and employment uses in order to support a sustainable and thriving downtown.The project is consistent with,and implements the following Downtown Sub-Area goals and policies: ·GOAL SA-3:The City promotes new residential,mixed use,and employment uses to add business and patrons and residents to create a sustainable and thriving Downtown,while maintaining a scale and character that is complimentary to existing uses. ·Policy SA-3.1: Implement the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan ·Policy SA-3.3: Balance parking needs and impacts in Downtown ·Policy SA-3.4 Focus housing growth Downtown The applicant’s proposal is designed to be consistent with the vision for the Downtown Transit Core land use designation,and the General Plan goals and policy direction to create vibrant,mixed-use areas near high- quality transit, with a focus on pedestrian and bicycle connections and linkages. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt under the provisions of CEQA,Class 1, Section 15301,Existing Facilities.The project site is an existing developed multi family development of 195 rental units completed in 2024.The property is surrounded by existing commercial and residential multi-family units.The proposed project is an operational change only to its parking space management and does not include any new construction or physical alterations to the existing residential development. CONCLUSION The proposed Parking Management and Monitoring Plan is designed to be consistent with the General Plan goals and the Zoning Ordinance requirements.The Plan would support operations and flexibility for existing residential units in a transit-oriented location. Therefore,it is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the proposed Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP) subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Attachments 1.Conditions of Approval 2.Parking Garage Floor Plans 3.Parking Management and Monitoring Plan City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™159 File #:24-775 Agenda Date:8/15/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/8/2024Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™160 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP) 401 Cypress Avenue Celeste Apartments (aka Cadance Phase 2) As recommended by staff on August 15, 2024 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Unbundled parking shall be managed and monitored on site as outlined in the Parking Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP) pursuant to Municipal Code Section 20.330.005(B)(2). Any revisions to the PMMP shall be subject to review and approval by the City. 161 102B11 104B11 106B11A TAMARACK LN MILLER AVE 108B13 LEASING CAFE LOBBY MAIL PACKAGES OVERSIZEDPACKAGES 128A12 CYPRESS AVECELESTESSF.COM 401 CYPRESS AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Site Map LEVEL 01 CELESTESSF.COM STUDIO 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM WITH DEN 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOME AMENITIES 162 EV 206A9204A9A202A9B200A9C EV EV EV EV EV EV EVEVEV FITNESS LOFT POCKETLOBBY TAMARACK LN BIKE PARKING GATE CYPRESS AVEMILLER AVE CELESTESSF.COM 401 CYPRESS AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Site Map LEVEL 02 CELESTESSF.COM STUDIO 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM WITH DEN 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOME AMENITIES 163 EVEV TAMARACK LN EVEVEVEV T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 308B14 310B3 LOBBY DOGWASH EV EV T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T MILLER AVE CYPRESS AVECELESTESSF.COM 401 CYPRESS AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Site Map LEVEL 03 CELESTESSF.COM STUDIO 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM WITH DEN 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOME AMENITIES 164 Sares Regis Group of Northern California, LLC 520 S El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Mateo, California 94402 T: 650-378-2800 F: 650-570-2233 July 31, 2024 City of South San Francisco Planning Commission Subject: Parking Management and Monitoring Plan Dear Planning Commission, I am writing regarding the request to unbundle all parking spaces within the Celeste Project located at 401 Cypress Ave. Currently, as outlined in the Conditions of Approval, 50% of the parking spaces are bundled. We understand that the City's policy concerning new construction has evolved, no longer mandating the bundling of parking. Thus, we are seeking a formal modification to the Conditions of Approval to unbundle 100% of the parking for all 195 market rate units (there are no deed restricted units at this property). Moving forward with 100% of parking unbundled would benefit the project in several ways. Firstly, by unbundling the parking, leasing becomes more flexible, allowing property management to right-size leases for each tenant according to their needs, whether they include parking or not. Unbundling the parking also ensures more efficient use of spaces; in the event of a resident without a car, we avoid situations where parking spaces go unused, thereby discouraging unnecessary car ownership. Finally, with a ratio of 1.15 spaces for every unit, this reassures residents who do require parking that their needs will be met effectively. Furthermore, by embracing unbundled parking, we are encouraging alternative transportation methods and reducing reliance on personal vehicles aligning broader goals of the City. We have a vested interest in improving the project and the leasing experience for our residents, and we believe this modification would provide more flexibility benefiting all parties involved. In accordance with your request, below is a description of how the parking will be managed, along with details on how the spaces will be assigned and monitored. Parking spaces are allocated to new residents when they lease their unit and express a desire for a parking space. These spaces, accessible via Miller Ave and Tamarack Lane, are located on the second and third floors of the podium, behind security gates, and are all on-site. Assignments are led by the residents and typically optimize for the proximity of the parking space to their residence. Upon assignment, residents receive a parking fob granting access to the garage. The garage is exclusively used by residents, with the exception of future residents visiting the site. The property management team keeps a record of all registered vehicles and their assigned spaces and conducts weekly walks through the garage to ensure cars are parked in their assigned spaces. The parking spaces are priced to avoid tenants parking on the streets or in nearby public parking lots. There are several types of parking available for tenants: single stalls, motorcycle stalls, ADA stalls, stalls equipped with EV chargers, and tandem stalls. Tandem stalls, designed to accommodate two cars, are exclusively assigned to the same apartment. On site spaces are and would only be available to apartment renters within the building. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information. Best, Marissa Reilly Senior Project Manager Sares Regis Group of Northern California 165