The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10.09.2024@630 Regular CCWednesday, October 9, 2024 6:30 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA Library Parks & Recreation Building, Council Chambers 901 Civic Campus Way, South San Francisco, CA City Council JAMES COLEMAN, Mayor (District 4) EDDIE FLORES, Vice Mayor (District 5) MARK ADDIEGO, Councilmember (District 1) MARK NAGALES, Councilmember (District 2) BUENAFLOR NICOLAS, Councilmember (District 3) ROSA GOVEA ACOSTA, City Clerk FRANK RISSO, City Treasurer SHARON RANALS, City Manager SKY WOODRUFF, City Attorney Regular Meeting Agenda 1 October 9, 2024City Council Regular Meeting Agenda How to observe the Meeting (no public comment, including via Zoom): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26, Comcast, Channel 27, or AT&T, Channel 99 2) https://www.ssf.net/Government/Video-Streaming-City-and-Council-Meetings/City-Council 3) https://www.youtube.com/@CityofSouthSanFrancisco/streams 4) Zoom meeting (streaming only): https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/88636346631 Webinar ID: 886 3634 6631 Join by Telephone: +1 669 900 6833 How to submit written Public Comment before the City Council Meeting: Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting via the eComment tab by 4:30 p.m. on the meeting date. Use the eComment portal by clicking on the following link: https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings or by visiting the City Council meeting's agenda page. eComments are also directly sent to the iLegislate application used by City Council and staff. How to provide Public Comment during the City Council Meeting: COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER During a meeting, comments can only be made in person: Complete a Digital Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chambers. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at [email protected]. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability -related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at [email protected], 72-hours before the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024 2 October 9, 2024City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURES (SB 1181) If you have donated $250 or more to the campaign of a South San Francisco elected official in the past twelve (12) months, please read the following paragraphs carefully: • The Levine Act (Gov. Code § 84308) requires any Party, Agent, or Participant, as defined in §84308(a), of a proceeding involving any grants, denials, renewals, restrictions, or modifications to any licenses and permits, entitlements for use, contracts, or franchises (“Proceeding”), to disclose on the record any contributions they have made to any elected, appointed, or candidate for City Officer totaling more than $250 within the preceding 12 months. • The Levine Act also requires any elected, appointed, alternate, or candidate for City Officer who has received a contribution totaling $250 within the past 12 months from a Party, Agent, or Participant of a Proceeding to (1) disclose that fact on the record involving the Proceeding and (2) to recuse themselves from, and in no way attempt to use their official position to influence any decision involving, the Proceeding. • Elected, appointed, alternates, or candidates for City Officer are prohibited from accepting, soliciting, and directing, and Parties, Participants, and Agents are prohibited from making, campaign contributions of more than $250 while the Proceeding is pending and for 12 months after the date a final decision is rendered for the Proceeding. Violations of the Levine Act may result in a civil action brought by the Fair Political Practice Commission (FPPC) for an amount up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation. Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of the Political Reform Act is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of up to the greater of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or three times the amount the person unlawfully contributed upon conviction for each violation. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PRESENTATIONS Proclamation recognizing October as Breast Cancer Awareness month. (James Coleman, Mayor) 1. Proclamation recognizing Code Enforcement Week October 6 - 12, 2024. (James Coleman, Mayor) 2. Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024 3 October 9, 2024City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Proclamation celebrating Indigenous Peoples’ Day on October 14, 2024. (James Coleman, Mayor) 3. COUNCIL COMMENTS/REQUESTS PUBLIC COMMENTS Under the Public Comment section of the agenda, members of the public may speak on any item not listed on the Agenda and on items listed under the Consent Calendar. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting. Written comments on agenda items received prior to 4:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud. If there appears to be a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce speaking time to limit the total amount of time for public comments (Gov. Code sec. 54954.3(b)(1).). Speakers that are not in compliance with the City Council's rules of decorum will be muted. CONSENT CALENDAR Matters under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted by one motion and without discussion. If, however, any Council member(s) wishes to comment on an item, they may do so before action is taken on the Consent Calendar. Following comments, if a Council member wishes to discuss an item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up in order after adoption of the Consent Calendar. Motion to approve the Minutes of September 25, 2024, and October 1, 2024. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) 4. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Partnership to fund ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World, enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places, nature, cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library | Parks & Recreation Center and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.021. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) 5. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Partnership to fund ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World, enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places, nature, cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library | Parks & Recreation Center and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.021. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) 5a. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024 4 October 9, 2024City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018. (Audriana Hossfeld, Senior Civil Engineer) 6. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018. 6a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT) or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. (Jeffrey Chou, Senior Civil Engineer) 7. Resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT) or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. 7a. Report regarding a resolution accepting a $270,000 grant from San Mateo County for the Economic Advancement Center, authorizing the City Manager to execute the grant agreement, and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.022 appropriating the funds. (Ernesto Lucero, Economic Development Manager) 8. Resolution accepting and appropriating a grant in the amount of $270,000 from San Mateo County towards economic mobility programs at the Economic Advancement Center in South San Francisco under Budget Amendment Number 25.022, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the associated grant agreement. 8a. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project - st1801 (Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer) 9. Resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project - st1801. 9a. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024 5 October 9, 2024City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving to enable Grand Avenue Library to update its furnishings and play equipment in the children’s area of the library. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) 10. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving to enable Grand Avenue Library to update its furnishings and play equipment in the children’s area of the library. 10a. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Report regarding a resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and associated Budget Amendment Number 25.015. (John Wilson, Associate Engineer) 11. Resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and approval of Budget Amendment Number 25.015. 11a. Report regarding a study session and potential introduction of an ordinance amending Title 8 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to add Chapter 8.78 to regulate certain private development projects by withholding the certificate of occupancy or building permit final when an owner or contractor has unpaid final wage theft judgments. (Tony Rozzi, Deputy Economic and Community Development Director) 12. Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco amending Title 8 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to add Chapter 8.78 to regulate certain private development projects by withholding the certificate of occupancy or building permit final when an owner or contractor has unpaid final wage theft judgments 12a. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL – COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Proclamation celebrating Filipino American Heritage Month presented on October 5, 2024. (James Coleman, Mayor) 13. Council discussion on designation of voting delegates and alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo. (Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor) 14. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024 6 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1024 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:1. Proclamation recognizing October as Breast Cancer Awareness month.(James Coleman, Mayor) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™7 Dated: October 9, 2024 RECOGNIZING OCTOBER AS BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, since 1985, the United States has recognized October as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, a month of bringing awareness, hope, and education about breast cancer and the importance of early detection, timely diagnosis, and comprehensive treatment; and WHEREAS, this year’s theme is “No-one should face breast cancer alone” and we honor all those we have lost to this terrible disease and celebrate the courageous survivors and advocates fighting to beat it, with 2.3 million new cases globally making breast cancer the most common cancer; and WHEREAS, today, there are more than four million breast cancer survivors in America – and this year alone, hundreds of thousands more will be diagnosed one in eight women will be diagnosed in their lifetimes, and though male breast cancer is rare, this year nearly 2,800 men will be diagnosed with the disease, and 530 men will die from it; and WHEREAS, health disparities among ethnic groups remain as black women are 40% more likely to die of breast cancer than white women; and WHEREAS, while mortality rates have declined thanks in part to early detection, progress is necessary in targeted treatments and new therapies for improved outcomes; and WHEREAS, during National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, we stand with our family, friends, and community as we recognize all who have joined their loved ones in fighting their battle as well as the advocates, researchers, and health care providers whose care and hard work gives hope to those living with breast cancer; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby recognize October as Breast Cancer Awareness Month and encourages everyone to learn about their risk for breast cancer, talk to their health care provider about recommended breast cancer screenings, and be screened with clinical breast exams and mammograms, as appropriate. ________________________________ James Coleman, Mayor ________________________________ Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor ________________________________ Mark Addiego, Councilmember ________________________________ Mark Nagales, Councilmember ________________________________ Buenaflor Nicolas, Councilmember 8 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1026 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:2. Proclamation recognizing Code Enforcement Week October 6 - 12, 2024.(James Coleman, Mayor) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™9 Dated: October 9, 2024 RECOGNIZING CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER APPRECIATION WEEK 2024 October 6-12, 2024 WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 283 in 2018, designating the second week in October as Code Enforcement Officer Appreciation Week; and WHEREAS, code enforcement professionals have a vital role in the health and welfare of our community and enforce local, state, and federal laws and ordinances related to building, zoning, housing, animal control, environment, health and life safety; and WHEREAS, safety is one of the primary ways that Code Enforcement Officers impact communities, when City Council adopts ordinances, rules and regulations that take into consideration the safety and well-being of the community; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for residents, civic leaders, and the business community in South San Francisco to gain knowledge of and to maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of code enforcement in their respective communities; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of South San Francisco City Council does hereby designate the week October 6-12, 2024, as National Code Enforcement Officer Appreciation Week; we urge our community and other government agencies to recognize the substantial contributions Code Enforcement Officers make to protecting our national health, safety, and quality of life. ________________________________ James Coleman, Mayor ________________________________ Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor ________________________________ Mark Addiego, Councilmember ________________________________ Mark Nagales, Councilmember ________________________________ Buenaflor Nicolas, Councilmember 10 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1025 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:3. Proclamation celebrating Indigenous Peoples’ Day on October 14, 2024.(James Coleman, Mayor) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™11 Dated: October 9, 2024 RECOGNIZING INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ DAY OCTOBER 14, 2024 WHEREAS, Indigenous Peoples’ Day was first proposed in 1977 by a delegation of Native Nations to the United Nations-sponsored International Conference on Discrimination against Indigenous Populations in the Americas; and WHEREAS, Indigenous people in America have often suffered persecution and removal from their homelands at the hands of governing bodies and through the colonization and settlement of America; and WHEREAS, our state is home to one of the largest and most diverse populations of Indigenous peoples anywhere in the United States; and WHEREAS, in addition to the many Indigenous peoples who have lived here for a very long time, others crossed borders and oceans to get to California, and some made their home here as a result of federal policies that forced the mass relocation of Native Americans westward; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the fact that South San Francisco is built upon the homelands and villages of the Indigenous Peoples’ of this region, without whom the building of the City would not be possible; and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco is committed to protecting and advocating for justice, human rights, and the dignity of all people who live, work, and visit in South San Francisco; and WHEREAS, Indigenous people contribute to the academic, economic, and cultural success and well-being of this community, and let’s reflect on how their resistance and persistence has shaped our community and California for the better. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby recognize October 14th as Indigenous Peoples’ Day and takes this day to reflect upon the ongoing struggles of Indigenous People, and to celebrate the thriving culture and value that Indigenous Peoples add to our community. ________________________________ James Coleman, Mayor ________________________________ Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor ________________________________ Mark Addiego, Councilmember ________________________________ Mark Nagales, Councilmember ________________________________ Buenaflor Nicolas, Councilmember 12 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1023 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:4. Motion to approve the Minutes of September 25, 2024, and October 1, 2024. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™13 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Coleman called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmember Addiego, present Councilmember Nagales, present Councilmember Nicolas, present Vice Mayor Flores, present Mayor Coleman, present PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Economic Development Manager Lucero led the pledge. AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Ranals requested to postpone Closed Session Item No. 26 to a future meeting date. LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURES (SB 1181) Following an inquiry, the Council reported no disclosures. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF • Economic Development Manager Lucero invited the Community to the Biotech Speaker Series on Friday, September 27th, at the LPR Council Chambers. • Executive Assistant Patea invited the community to the Centennial Way Park Ribbon Cutting on Sunday, September 29, 2024, Community Outreach Meeting for Dundee Park on Monday, October 7, 2024, at the Serra Vista Elementary, Festa Italiana on September 29, 2024, at Orange Park, and State of the City on Tuesday, October 2, 2024, at the LPR, Banquet Hall. • Library Director Sommers invited the community to attend the program day to recognize Filipino American History Month Celebration, on October 5, 2024, at the LPR, Social Hall and Nurse Unseen film screening on October 20, 2024, at the LPR, Council Chambers. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 6:30 p.m. Library Parks and Recreation Building Council Chambers 901 Civic Campus Way, South San Francisco, CA 14 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 2 • Human Resources Director Lockhart invited the community to attend the SSF Diversity Employment Day on Tuesday, October 8, 2024, at the LPR. • Parks and Recreation Director Mediati informed the community of the Free Tree Giveaway Program and invited them to attend the Coastal Clean Up at the end of Haskins Way on Saturday, September 28, 2024, and Community Planting Event at Brentwood Park Tree Planting on Saturday, October 12, 2024. PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation recognizing September 21, 2024, as World Alzheimer’s Day. (James Coleman, Mayor) Councilmember Nicolas presented the proclamation to Kasey Jo Cullinan, Recreation and Community Services Supervisor for Senior Programs. Supervisor Cullinan thanked the Council for the proclamation and shared the support and services offered to the community. 2. Proclamation recognizing October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month. (James Coleman, Mayor) Mayor Coleman presented the proclamation to CORA representatives Lynn Schwett and Celeste Mercado. They thanked the Council for the recognition and partnership and discussed the services offered to the community. 3. Proclamation celebrating National Italian-American Heritage Month. (James Coleman, Mayor) Councilmember Addiego presented the proclamation to Italian American Citizens Club President, Leo Perini. President Perini thanked the Council for their recognition and encouraged the community to attend Festa Italiana. 4. Proclamation recognizing Fire Prevention Week as October 6 - 12, 2024. (James Coleman, Mayor) Councilmember Nagales presented the proclamation to Fire Marshall Hardage. Fire Marshall Hardage thanked the Council for their continued support and shared this year’s outreach efforts. 5. Proclamation recognizing September as National Recovery Month. (James Coleman, Mayor) Mayor Coleman presented the proclamation Recovery Services Advocate Mike McHenry. 6. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Presentation. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair, Darryl Yip, provided a presentation to the Council and discussed the committee’s priorities. COUNCIL COMMENTS/REQUESTS Councilmember Nagales shared he attended the ribbon cutting ceremony for the Karyl Matsumoto Plaza and thanked her for her transportation efforts. He also recognized staff for dedicated hours to ensure the success of Concert in the Park. He requested the meeting be adjourned in memory of Jim Elder. 15 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 3 Councilmember Nicolas echoed the thanks to staff for the success of the Karyl Matsumoto Plaza ceremony and Concert in the Park. She extended her gratitude to Librarian, Stacy Lein, and Library Director, Valerie Sommers, for their assistance in the successful Alzheimer's Presentation by Randall Yip. She requested the meeting to adjourned in memory of Jim Elder, Elsa Evangelista, Betty Holler, and Rina Luna Andres. Councilmember Addiego shared he attended the Historical Society Meeting where Genentech provided an informative presentation. He also attended the Italian Catholic Federation and invited those interested to attend. Additionally, he invited the community to attend the Sisters Cities Committee meeting on November 12, 2024, at Cable Car Café. Vice Mayor Flores shared the success of events to include Fiestas Patrias and Scam Stopper. He shared he attended the grand opening of the Hangar Restaurant located at 460 Forbes Blvd. He requested City Manager Ranals to share new additions to Matsumoto Plaza. City Manager Ranals noted that a Wildflower bakery and tap room is set to open by the end of the year. Additionally, he requested Economic and Community Development Deputy Director to address the concerns regarding anti-displacement and provide an update on the strategy. Deputy Director Rozzi provided the community with an update. Mayor Coleman apprised the community of events attended to include the grand opening of the Hanger Restaurant, Karyl Matsumoto Plaza ribbon cutting ceremony, Concert in the Park, and Fiji Chamber of Commerce. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA ITEMS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Michael McHenry (Item No. 5) • Serena (Item No. 5) • Daniela Jonguitud • Mary Prem • Vict oria Yan • Michael Harris • Cynthia Marcopulos • Barbara Erhard • Peggy Deras • Cory David • Katherine Acosta • Julio Garcia • Dolores • Amanda Anthony • Fionnola Villamejor • Leslie Fong PUBLIC COMMENTS – CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS The following individual addressed the City Council: • Montserrat Mata (Item No. 18) 16 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 4 CONSENT CALENDAR The Assistant City Clerk duly read the Consent Calendar, after which the Council voted and engaged in a discussion of specific items as follows. Item No. 10 and Item No. 17 were pulled by Councilmember Addiego and Item No. 18 was pulled by Mayor Coleman for further discussion. 7. Motion to approve the Minutes for September 11, 2024. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) 8. Motion to cancel the Regular City Council meetings of November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) 9. Report regarding Resolution No. 141-2024 amending the City’s Conflict of Interest Code to update the List of Designated Positions. (Rosa Govea Acosta, City Clerk) 10. Report regarding Resolution No. 142-2024 approving the First Amendment to the 2024-2025 Wage and Salary Schedule to establish the wage range for the new classification of Natural Resources Specialist (Leah Lockhart, Human Resources Director) 11. Report regarding Resolution No. 143-2024 awarding a construction contract to Graham Contractors, Inc. of San Jose, California, for the Crack Seal, Patch, and Base Repair Project in an amount not to exceed $524,069.92 and related actions. (Angel Torres, Senior Civil Engineer) 12. Report regarding Resolution No. 144-2024 for the submittal of a grant application to, and if awarded, executing a funding agreement with, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority for Cycle 2 Alternative Congestion Relief & Transportation Demand Management Program Funding. (John Wilson, Associate Civil Engineer) 13. Report regarding Ordinance No. 1661-2024 amending Chapter 8.27 “Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction” of Title 8 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code relating to organic waste disposal and related regulations pursuant to California Senate Bill 1383. (Marissa Garren, Public Works Management Analyst II) 14. Report regarding Resolution No. 145-2024 approving the draft response to the San Mateo County Grand Jury Report titled, “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” (Tony Rozzi, Deputy Director, Economic & Community Development Department). 15. Report regarding Resolution No. 146-2024 approving the South San Francisco Fire Department’s annual inspections performance pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code section 13146.4. (Ian Hardage, Fire Marshal) 16. Report regarding Resolution No. 147-2024 accepting $118,000 from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety for the “Selective Traffic Enforcement Program” (STEP) to be used for personnel overtime, equipment, and training expenses and amend the Police Department’s Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25 by approving Budget Amendment Number 25.016. (Fahmida Murphy, Police Lieutenant) 17. Report regarding Resolution No. 148-2024 authorizing the City Manager to sign a letter committing $697,521 in matching funds to a U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration “Good Jobs Challenge Grant” application supporting economic mobility programs in South San Francisco. (Michael Guss, Economic Development Specialist) 17 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 5 18. Report regarding Resolution No. 149-2024 approving the Fifth Amendment of a contract with JobTrain for workforce development support services, for a contract increase in the sum of $387,613, and a resolution approving the Fifth Amendment of a contract with Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center for small business and entrepreneurship support services, for a contract increase in the sum of $425,000, both offered at the Economic Advancement Center in South San Francisco. (Ernesto Lucero, Economic Development Manager) Item No. 18: Economic Development Manager Lucero provided an explanation to address the contract increase, noted no additional funding is needed, and provided an explanation for the lease extension. Councilmember Addiego noted the program's success and similar programs with the San Mateo County Human Services Agencies and requested that staff address funding needs with the County. The following individual addressed the City Council: • Karla Ostorga • Viviana Item No. 17: Economic Development Specialist Guss presented the report. Economic Development Manager Lucero explained the grant sources for matching funds and confirmed this would allow for the expansion of the Promotores Program. Item No. 10: Councilmember Addiego expressed his support if the council's consensus was to approve the item but noted the importance of fiscal prudence given the budget deficit. Councilmember Nicolas noted the importance of the department's budget-neutral permanent position. Motion – Councilmember Nicolas /Second – Councilmember Nagales: To approve Consent Calendar 7-18, by roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores, Councilmember Addiego, Nicolas, and Nagales; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING 19. Report regarding a public hearing relating to the bond financing for the Grand and Linden Family Apartments (201-219 Grand Avenue and 418 Linden Avenue) including issuance of tax-exempt bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $45 million. (Elia Moreno, Management Analyst I) Public hearing opened: 8:56 p.m. Economic and Community Development Director Selander provided the report. Public hearing closed: 8:58 p.m. Motion – Councilmember Addiego /Second – Councilmember Nicolas: To approve Resolution No. 151-2024 approving the issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority for the Grand and Linden Family Apartments, by roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores, Councilmember Addiego, Nagales, and Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. 20. Report regarding holding a public hearing regarding the Program Year 2023-2024 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for the City’s Community Development Block Grant Program and adopting a resolution approving the Program Year 2023-2024 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report and authorizing its 18 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 6 submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Alvina Condon, Management Analyst II) Public hearing opened: 8:59 p.m. Management Analyst II Condon presented the report. Councilmember Nagales requested that staff include reporting on the number of services delivered instead of the number of referrals. Public hearing closed: 9:06 p.m. Motion – Councilmember Nagales /Second – Vice Mayor Flores: To approve Resolution No, 152- 2024 approving the Program Year 2023-24 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for the City’s Community Development Block Grant Program and adopting a resolution approving the Program Year 2023-24 Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizing its submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development., by roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores, Councilmember Addiego, Nagales, and Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 21. Report regarding Resolution No. 153-2024 awarding a construction contract to HP Communications, Inc. for the 2024 Broadband Fiber-Optic Network Project (Project No. pf2210, Bid No. 2697) in the amount not to exceed $998,581.40, for a total construction budget of $1,148,368.61, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. (Tony Barrera, Director of Information Technology) Information Technology Director Barrera provided the report. The Council engaged in questions and discussions and received responses. Motion – Councilmember Nagales /Second – Councilmember Addiego: To approve Resolution No. 153-2024 awarding a construction contract to HP Communications, Inc. for the 2024 Broadband Fiber-Optic Network Project (Project No. pf2210, Bid No. 2697) in the amount not to exceed $998,581.40, for a total construction budget of $1,148,368.61, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, by roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores, Councilmember Addiego, Nagales, and Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. 22. Report regarding Resolution No. 154-2024 authorizing a five-year service agreement with LAZ Parking, California, LLC to provide parking enforcement services in South San Francisco, in a total amount not to exceed $3,450,267.20 for parking enforcement within the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. (Ken Chetcuti, Police Captain) Police Captain Chetcuti presented the report. Vice President of Government Services with LAZ Parking Mahammad Mansoor provided a presentation to review the services offered. The Council engaged in questions and discussion and received responses. The Council provided feedback and highlighted the importance of fairness and consistency in implementation. Motion – Councilmember Addiego/Second – Councilmember Nicolas: To approve Resolution No. 154-2024 authorizing a five-year service agreement with LAZ Parking, California, LLC to provide parking enforcement services in South San Francisco, in a total amount not to exceed $3,450,267.20 for parking enforcement within the City of South San Francisco and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement, by roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores; Councilmember Addiego, Nagales, and Nicolas; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. 19 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 7 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL – COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 23. Council discussion on City Selection Committee vacant position and meeting alternate. (James Coleman, Mayor) Mayor Coleman indicated that he is seeking direction from the Council to vote at the upcoming City Selection Committee meeting to address the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) vacancy. The Council engaged in discussions and provided direction. 24. Council discussion on Peninsula Division of the League of California Cities Board of Directors Election 2024-2025. (James Coleman, Mayor) Mayor Coleman and Vice Mayor Flores provided information surrounding the upcoming vote. The Council engaged in discussions and provided direction. CLOSED SESSION Entered into Closed Session: 10:12 p.m. 25. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Alvarado, Milton vs. City of South San Francisco (Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board Case No. ADJ12169265) Name of case: Wall, Keith vs. City of South San Francisco (Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board Case No. ADJ16095117) (Sky Woodruff, City Attorney, Kyle Royer, RTGR Law, and Leah Lockhart, Human Resources Director) 26. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: 400 Miller Avenue (APN 012-303-110) City Negotiators: Nell Selander, Economic and Community Development Director, and Sky Woodruff, City Attorney Negotiating Party: Nisar M Shaikh Trust Under Negotiations: Price and terms Item No. 26 was postponed to a future meeting date. Resumed from Closed Session: 10:32 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, Mayor Coleman adjourned the City Council meeting at 10:33 p.m. *** Adjourned in Memory of Jim Elder, Elsa Evangelista, Betty Holler, and Rina Luna Andres *** 20 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 8 Submitted by: Approved by: Jazmine Miranda James Coleman Assistant City Clerk Mayor Approved by the City Council: / / NOTE: The Meeting Minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council members discussions of meeting items can be viewed in archived video/audio recordings on the City’s website at https://www.ssf.net/Government/Video-Streaming-City-and-Council-Meetings/City-Council Public comments submitted via the eComment portal can be viewed in the City Clerk’s repository at https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings?scope=past 21 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Coleman called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmember Addiego, present Councilmember Nagales, present Councilmember Nicolas, present Vice Mayor Flores, present Mayor Coleman, present Performances by the El Camino Jazz Band, and a dance performance from South San Francisco High School. PRESENTATIONS 1. 2024 State of the City Update. (James Coleman, Mayor) Mayor Coleman delivered the State of the City address and highlighted the proposals of the Eastern Neighborhood CFD, and the new biotech campus with housing and a Safeway on 180 El Camino Real. INTERMISSION 7:35 p.m. - 7:57 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS – comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda. The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Cynthia Marcopulos • Daniela Jonguitud • Erin Chazer ADJOURNMENT Being no further business Mayor Coleman adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING STATE OF THE CITY CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TUESDAY, OCTOBER 01, 2024 6:30 p.m. 22 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 1, 2024 MINUTES PAGE 2 Submitted by: Approved: Sarah Harper James Coleman Deputy City Clerk Mayor Approved: / / NOTE: The Meeting Minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council members discussions of meeting items can be viewed in archived video/audio recordings on the City’s website at https://www.ssf.net/Government/Video-Streaming-City-and-Council-Meetings/City-Council Public comments submitted via the eComment portal can be viewed in the City Clerk’s repository at https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings?scope=past 23 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1007 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:5. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Partnership to fund ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World,enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places,nature,cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library |Parks &Recreation Center and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.021. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Partnership (PLP)to fund ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World,enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places,nature,cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library |Parks & Recreation Center (LPR) and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.021. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Library Department has been awarded $12,000 from PLP to purchase Virtual Reality equipment for the Amgen Discovery Center and develop a series of programs for our community to globetrot together and come face to face with animals in the wild,from the comfort of LPR.By adding a set of ten virtual reality headsets, we aim to engage students,adults and seniors in a group setting,with a range of immersive educational experiences in art, culture, nature, technology, travel and more. FISCAL IMPACT Grant funds will be used to amend the Library Department’s current FY 2024-25 Operating Budget per Budget Amendment Number 25.021 to reflect an increase of $12,000.Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Acceptance of this grant will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan under Priorities #2:Quality of Life by providing access to lifelong learning opportunities and #6:Community Connections,which includes “key social,recreational and educational programs…including cultural activities,special events,in-person learning and enrichment classes for all ages, and health, wellness, and STEAM programs.” CONCLUSION Receipt of these funds will enable the Library to provide Virtual Reality immersive learning and experiences in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library |Parks &Recreation Center.It is recommended that the City City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™24 File #:24-1007 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:5. Council accept $12,000 in grant funding and approve Budget Amendment Number 25.021. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™25 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1008 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:5a. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Partnership to fund ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World,enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places,nature,cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library |Parks &Recreation Center and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.021.(Valerie Sommer, Library Director) WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco (“City)Library Department is dedicated to assisting all residents in locating and accessing information; and WHEREAS,Pacific Library Partnership awarded a grant to the City in the amount of $12,000 to purchase ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World,enabling community members to travel virtually and explore new places,nature,cultures and information in the Amgen Discovery Center at the Library | Parks & Recreation Center; and WHEREAS,the virtual reality headsets and software will aim to engage students,adults and seniors in a group setting with a range of immersive educational experiences in art,culture,nature,technology,travel,and more; and WHEREAS,staff recommends the acceptance of the grant funding in the amount of $12,000 to purchase ten Virtual Reality Headsets and Software and launch a program called VR World; and WHEREAS, receipt of these grant funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding; and WHEREAS,the foregoing grant funds will be used to amend the Library Department’s current FY 2024-25 Operating Budget per Budget Amendment Number 25.021. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby accepts $12,000 in grant funding from Pacific Library Foundation and amends the Library Department’s FY2024-25 Operating Budget to reflect an increase of $12,000. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™26 File #:24-1008 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:5a. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™27 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-788 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:6. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018.(Audriana Hossfeld, Senior Civil Engineer) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The State-funded Climate Adaptation Planning grants ($31.9 million)will support tribal,local,and regional identification of transportation-related climate vulnerabilities through the development of climate adaptation plans,as well as project-level adaptation planning to identify adaptation projects and strategies for transportation infrastructure. On January 10,2024,South San Francisco City Council authorized the application to the Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant for the South San Francisco (SSF)Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project (sd2402) feasibility study. City staff submitted the application on January 18, 2024. On July 9,2024,Caltrans approved the SSF Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project (sd2402)application through the Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant.Since South San Francisco had already secured funding through the Ocean Protection Council (OPC)SB-1 grant,staff requested a reduction of the Caltrans award to $262,500 to cover additional transportation analyses not included in the OPC SB-1 grant application. This Caltrans funding will enhance the feasibility study,which aims to develop conceptual solutions to address coastal flooding exacerbated by sea level rise and increased storm surges along the San Francisco Bay, specifically near the outfalls of Colma Creek and San Bruno Creek (see Attachment 1). This feasibility study will include collaboratively working with multiple jurisdictional agencies to examine coastal flood protection alternatives that could benefit residences,businesses,critical transportation infrastructure (US‐101,Caltrain,and SamTrans),and other key regional infrastructure such as the San Francisco International Airport (SFO)and the South San Francisco -San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP).The work will involve interagency coordination with Caltrans,SamTrans,One Shoreline,San Bruno, Caltrain,the San Francisco Bay Conservation &Development Commission (BCDC),and SFO,and extensive outreach to community and environmental stakeholder groups.The planning will also include developing and applying feasibility criteria to analyze the viability of the proposed solutions relative to technical,financial, environmental,and community acceptance considerations.A community‐driven design process will develop and analyze solutions culminating in a preferred alternative,which will be documented in a report with 10% conceptual design documents and order‐of‐magnitude cost estimates. FISCAL IMPACT The OPC SB-1 grant will fully fund the feasibility study phase of sd2402.The Caltrans Climate Adaptation City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™28 File #:24-788 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:6. The OPC SB-1 grant will fully fund the feasibility study phase of sd2402.The Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant will fully fund additional transportation analyses for the feasibility study.OPC SB-1 grant funds will be leveraged as the local match for the Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant.Therefore,no match is required from South San Francisco funds and there is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund in accepting this grant. Budget Amendment Number 25.018 will increase budgeted revenues and correspondingly increase consulting and staff time appropriations by the full amount of the grant ($262,500)for fiscal year 2024-25 in project sd2402. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this action will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by maintaining and improving infrastructure to serve the public. CONCLUSION City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018. Attachments: 1.Flood Map City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™29 ATTACHMENT 1 30 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-789 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:6a. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with California Department of Transportation for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.018. WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco is eligible to receive State funding through the California Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS,on January 18,2024,the City of South San Francisco applied for Caltrans Climate Adaptation Grant to fund the feasibility phase of South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project (sd2402); and WHEREAS,The OPC SB 1 grant will fully fund the feasibility study phase of sd2402.The Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant will fully fund additional transportation analyses for the feasibility study.OPC SB 1 grant funds will be leveraged as the local match for the Caltrans Climate Adaptation Planning grant.Therefore, there is no match required from South San Francisco funds and no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund in accepting this grant; and WHEREAS,if approved,Budget Amendment Number 25.018 would increase budgeted revenues by $262,500 for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby accepts the grant funds from Caltrans for the South San Francisco Shoreline Protection and Connectivity Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager,Sharon Ranals,or designee, to execute all Restricted Grant Agreements and any amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council appoints the City Manager,Sharon Ranals,or designee,as agent to conduct all negotiations,execute and submit all documents including,but not limited to applications, agreements,payment requests and so on,which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project(s),and take any other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution on behalf of the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves Budget Amendment Number 25.018 to amend City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™31 File #:24-789 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:6a. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves Budget Amendment Number 25.018 to amend the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating Budget to add $262,500 for Project No. sd2402. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™32 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-948 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:7. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)Regional Measure 3 (RM3)Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT)or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. (Jeffrey Chou, Senior Civil Engineer) RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)Regional Measure 3 (RM3)Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT)or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Safe Routes to Transit &Bay Trail (SR2TBT)Program is a competitive grant program administered by MTC that funds bicycle and pedestrian access improvements on and in the vicinity of state-owned toll bridges connecting to rail transit stations and ferry terminals.This program is funded through Regional Measure 3 (RM3),passed by voters in 2018, which raised the toll for all vehicles on State-owned toll bridges in the San Francisco Bay Area in order to fund transportation projects that reduce congestion and improve access to toll bridge corridors. East Grand Avenue Corridor Improvements East Grand Avenue serves as a key gateway to jobs in the East of 101 Area as well as the primary connection to the Caltrain Station and access to the San Francisco Bay Trail.The proposed project aims to enhance safety,accessibility, traffic flow,and connectivity throughout the East of 101 Area,aligning with the City's broader goals and policies for improved infrastructure and community development. See Attachment 1 - Project Location Map. The proposed transit and safety improvements include: ·Sidewalks and trail improvements along East Grand Avenue,serving pedestrians and bicyclists traveling between Caltrain/Downtown and the East of 101 Area, promoting safer and more accessible active transportation. ·Eliminating the channelized right turn “slip”lanes and providing curb extensions at key intersections to improve traffic operations and reduce vehicle-pedestrian conflicts, enhancing overall safety. The East Grand Avenue corridor is also listed as a “high”priority for the City under “Major Transportation Investment”in the General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT Staff continuously seek for various grant funding opportunities.Upon successful award of grant(s),staff will work with the City Council as necessary for budget appropriation to ensure sufficient funds to cover a local match. The Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT)does not require a local match.However,leveraging local funds will increase the scoring for the grant application,which would enhance the competitiveness of the application and demonstrate the City's commitment to the project. The City would be responsible for a match up to $2,000,000. Funding is available in FY 2024-25 in East of 101 Traffic Impact Fees under related CIP Project No.tr1602 to cover the matching funds. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™33 File #:24-948 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:7. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this action will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by maintaining and improving infrastructure to serve the public. CONCLUSION City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)Regional Measure 3 (RM3)Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT)or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™34 PROJECT LOCATION MAP 35 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-949 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:7a. Resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Safe Routes to Transit and Bay Trail Program (SR2TBT) or similar grant applications for a local match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue. WHEREAS, the East Grand Avenue corridor is listed as a high priority under Major Transportation Investment in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the improvements to be included in the implementation grant will include various transit and safety improvements along East Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS,the SR2TBT funds transportation project that reduce congestion and improve access to toll bridge corridors; and WHEREAS, there is no local match requirement for the RM3 funds; and WHEREAS,staff requests the City Council approve the application to SR2TBT grant program for a local grant match amount not exceeding $2,000,000 to support Corridor Improvements along East Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS,there is funding available under FY 2024-25 in East of 101 Traffic Impact Fees under related CIP Project No. tr1602 to cover the matching fund; and WHEREAS,staff requests the City Council’s authorization to submit all future grant applications for corridor improvements along East Grand Avenue. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby authorizes an application for transit and safety improvements along the East Grand Avenue Corridor; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council approves a local grant match amount not exceeding $2,000,000, if the grant is awarded; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions consistent with the intention of the resolution and accompanying staff report. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™36 File #:24-949 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:7a. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™37 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-988 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:8. ..Title Report regarding a resolution accepting a $270,000 grant from San Mateo County for the Economic Advancement Center,authorizing the City Manager to execute the grant agreement,and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.022 appropriating the funds. (Ernesto Lucero, Economic Development Manager) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution accepting a $270,000 grant from San Mateo County for the Economic Advancement Center,authorizing the City Manager to execute the grant agreement, and approving Budget Amendment Number 25.022 appropriating the funds. BACKGROUND In March 2021,San Mateo County (County)granted $200,000 towards the cost to establish the Economic Advancement Center (EAC)in South San Francisco.Of this amount,half funded a portion of operational costs and half funded a portion of programmatic costs specific to small business and entrepreneurship support services provided by Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center.These funds supported a portion of the total operating cost of the EAC in Fiscal Year (FY)2021-22 and targeted all of North San Mateo County,including the Cities of South San Francisco,Brisbane,Daly City,Pacifica,San Bruno,and Millbrae,and the Town of Colma.The average cost to operate the EAC is approximately $1.3 million annually,and the EAC is nearly 3 ½ years old. The EAC offered the first economic mobility hub in South San Francisco.The impact of the EAC has been significant and widespread.Services have increased due to its successes in connecting the community to vital pandemic recovery support.Today,these now include JobTrain,Renaissance,the City Promotores Program, YMCA,County Health and Human Services,El Concilio,and the Leadership Council of San Mateo County. These service providers offer valuable services around workforce development,small business and entrepreneurship support,community navigation support,health benefit assistance,as well as housing and food resources.To date,2,224 individuals have been served by the EAC since it opened.Of those 2,224 individuals, 317 individuals have been placed into jobs,with an average wage of $22.48 per hour.Additionally,188 firms have been assisted by Renaissance. These firms created or retained 303 jobs. The economic impact of the EAC is estimated to be $36 million.This includes $15 million in gross receipts from firms assisted by Renaissance,$20 million in wages earned by individuals placed into jobs by JobTrain, and $1 million in investment into firms assisted by Renaissance.The return on the City’s investment is roughly 10:1.However,because not all the individuals and firms assisted at the EAC are from South San Francisco,not all of the benefit is realized within South San Francisco, but rather broadly throughout the region. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™38 File #:24-988 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:8. To support the EAC,the City appropriated $2 million in general funds in 2021 for its operations and since then, the City has also attracted an additional $2.9 million in grant funds to continue operating the EAC.These included $1.13 million from the U.S.Economic Development Administration (EDA),$1 million from the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GOBiz),$500,000 from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL),the $200,000 from the County referenced above,$20,000 from the National League of Cities (NLC), as well as a small amount of private donations. At its September 25,2024 meeting,City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to separate professional service contracts with JobTrain and Renaissance.These contracts expire on June 30,2025.Funding to support the EAC for FY 2024-25 is fully budgeted with already appropriated and approved funding to support all operational and programmatic costs. DISCUSSION The associated resolution provides the City an additional $270,000 from the County of San Mateo to support portions of the total operational and programmatic cost of the EAC.Specifically,the funding supports services offered by Renaissance ($184,165),services offered by JobTrain ($75,835),and the City Promotores Program ($10,000). Performance metrics are identified in the associated grant agreement and include:(1)52 individuals to receive business counseling services;(2)8 new businesses to be created;(3)provide job placement referrals for 20 individuals to be placed into full-time employment;and (4)provide resource referrals for 20 individuals through the City Promotores Program. The County grant is funded by Measure K.Measure K is the half-cent general sales tax initially approved by San Mateo County voters in November 2012 and extended in November 2016 for a total of thirty years. The Board of Supervisors (Board)held study sessions on Measure K expenditures and approved funds for the fiscal year FY 2023-24 budget cycle,divided equally among the five supervisorial districts,for one-time district -discretionary needs and projects.Districts 1 and 5 submitted requests to use their district-discretionary Measure K funds to contribute to a portion of the cost of the EAC.Of the total $270,000 grant,$250,000 is provided by District 1, Supervisor Pine, and $20,000 from District 5, Supervisor Canepa. The Board will consider this item at their meeting on October 8,2024.Staff will provide an update to the action item. Under the associated grant agreement,the City would have until December 31,2025 to spend the grant funds. Staff anticipate all performance metrics will be met prior to June 30,2025 based on the deliverables in the current contracts with JobTrain and Renaissance. FISCAL IMPACT City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™39 File #:24-988 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:8. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund by accepting the grant funds. CONCLUSION Staff is working on two separate funding sustainability efforts to continue the current model of the Economic Advancement Center.One is with the centers in Half Moon Bay and North Fair Oaks,under a $100,000 Chan Zuckerberg Initiative grant to analyze the effectiveness of three.The second is specific to the EAC in South San Francisco with its service providers who are meeting with the City monthly to determine the best funding plan into FY 2025-26 and beyond.As federal and state grant funding that has supported the EAC is beginning to sunset, the funding strategy may pivot to include philanthropic funding support as well. Staff will also continue to engage with the County on the status of funding for North County to ensure there is an equitable effort to fund economic mobility programs at the Economic Advancement Center in South San Francisco,the Opportunity Center of the Coastside in Half Moon Bay,and the North Fair Oaks Economic and Employment Center in North Fair Oaks. Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution accepting and appropriating a grant in the amount of $270,000 from San Mateo County towards economic mobility programs at the Economic Advancement Center in South San Francisco under Budget Amendment Number 25.022,and authorizing the City Manager to execute the associated grant agreement. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™40 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1016 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:8a. Resolution accepting and appropriating a grant in the amount of $270,000 from San Mateo County towards economic mobility programs at the Economic Advancement Center in South San Francisco under Budget Amendment Number 25.022, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the associated grant agreement. WHEREAS, in March 2021, City Council accepted a grant from San Mateo County (County) in the amount of $200,000 to support a portion of the cost to establish the Economic Advancement Center (EAC). Of this amount, $100,000 of this grant supported operational costs, and $100,000 supported programmatic costs towards small business and entrepreneurship support services in FY 2021-22; and WHEREAS, since the EAC opened virtually in July 2021 and then opened the center in February 2022, the City appropriated $2 million in general funds in 2021, and attracted an additional $2.9 million in grant funds including $1.13 million from the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), $1 million from the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GOBiz), $500,000 from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), $200,000 from the County, $20,000 from the National League of Cities (NLC), as well as a small amount of private donations; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2024, City Council approved a resolution that authorized the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to separate professional service contracts with JobTrain and Renaissance, expiring on June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, funding to support the EAC for FY 2024-25 is fully budgeted with funding that is already appropriated and approved to support all operational and programmatic costs at the EAC; and WHEREAS, the City, its partners, and regional stakeholders continue to explore a funding strategy to continue the EAC with its current model into FY 2025-26 and beyond; and WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors approved a grant in the amount of $270,000 to programmatic services at the EAC at its October 8, 2024 meeting; and WHEREAS, the County will require the City to enter into a grant agreement to receive the funds, which will expire by December 31, 2025; and City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™41 File #:24-1016 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:8a. WHEREAS, the $270,000 grant will specifically fund supports services offered by Renaissance for $184,165, services offered by JobTrain for $75,835, and $10,000 to the City Promotores Program; and WHEREAS, the performance metrics identified in the associated grant agreement require the City to report on metrics to include: (1) 52 individuals to receive business counseling services; (2) 8 new business to be created; (3) provide job placement referrals for 20 individuals to be placed into full-time employment; and (4) provide resource referrals for 20 individuals through the City Promotores Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby takes the following actions: 1.Finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as part of this Resolution; and 2.Authorizes the City Manager to execute the grant agreement with San Mateo County, incorporated herein as Exhibit A, with any amendments which do not materially increase the City’s obligations approved as to form by the City Attorney; and 3.Accepts the grant funds under Budget Amendment Number 25.022, with the understanding that expenditures may overlap multiple fiscal years; and 4.Authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™42 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 1 MEASURE K GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO This Agreement is entered into this 8th day of October 2024 by and between the County of San Mateo, a political subdivision of the state of California, hereinafter called “County,” and City of South San Francisco, hereinafter called “Grantee.” * * * WHEREAS, the Grantee has applied to the County seeking a grant for the purpose of funding the matters set forth in its Project described in Exhibit A (the “Grant”); WHEREAS, the County has approved the grant of certain funds to Grantee pursuant to the terms set forth in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the parties to this Agreement as follows: 1. Exhibits and Attachments The following exhibits and attachments are attached to this Agreement and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference: Exhibit A—Project Description Exhibit B—Reporting and Invoicing 2. Grant County hereby grants to Grantee a sum not to exceed Two Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($270,000) in consideration of and on the condition that the sum be expended for the sole purpose of carrying out the objectives of Grantee’s Project as identified in Exhibit A, and in no event shall the County’s total fiscal obligation under this Agreement exceed this amount. Grantee agrees to assume any obligation to secure and furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to carry out its Project. Funds granted under this Agreement shall not be disbursed until execution of this Agreement by County and Grantee. County shall disburse grant funds to Grantee 30 calendar days after receipt of a satisfactory invoice. Invoices should be accompanied by back up documentation (e.g., receipts for professional services rendered, salary and benefits back up, etc.) and submittal of any required summary reports outlined in Exhibits A or B. The County reserves the right to change the disbursement method during the term of this Agreement. The disbursement schedule is as follows: • Payment 1- Invoice for up to 50% of the grant ($135,000), upon submission of receipts/invoices showing expenditures and proof of performance measures, timesheets, and activity logs on items funded by the grant and listed in Exhibit A and/or B. • Payment 2- Invoice for remainder of the grant ($135,000), upon submission of receipts/invoices showing expenditures and proof of performance measures, timesheets, and activity logs on items funded by the grant and listed in Exhibit A and/or B, including photographs and use of Measure K logo as approved by the County. INVOICES: Requests for grant disbursement should be (1) on the organization’s official letterhead, (2) include date of invoice, amount requested, and Agreement number, and (3) submitted to the attention of: County Executive’s Office 500 County Center, 5th Floor 43 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 2 Redwood City, CA 94063 [email protected] 3. Term & Termination This Agreement is subject to approval of the South San Francisco City Council and shall not go into effect until formal approval of the South San Francisco City Council is obtained. Subject to compliance with all terms and conditions, the term of this Agreement shall begin on the date following South San Francisco City Council formal approval of this Agreement and continue through December 31, 2025. If the City of South San Francisco City Council does not formally approve this Agreement by October 23, 2024,this Agreement shall be considered terminated. County assumes all risk of possible non-acceptance of approved and appropriated funds by Grantee. This Agreement will not automatically renew, nor shall it create any reliance on the possibility of future grants. County may terminate this Agreement based upon the unavailability of Federal, State, or County funds by providing written notice to Grantee within a reasonable time after County learns of said unavailability of funding. Grantee acknowledges that this Agreement may be subject to approval of the Board of Supervisors, and assumes all risk of possible non-appropriation and non-approval of funds. County may suspend and/or terminate this Agreement if Grantee fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement and may, in its sole discretion, withhold or cancel pending and future disbursements of grant funds and/or require Grantee to return some or all funds disbursed under this Agreement. 4. Relationship of Parties Notwithstanding any publicity or other references to the County required to be made in connection with the Project as set forth in Exhibit A, Grantee understands and agrees that the Project performed under this Agreement is not performed by Grantee as an independent contractor of the County or as an employee of County and that neither Grantee nor its employees acquire any of the rights, privileges, powers, or advantages of County contractors or County employees. Grantee acknowledges and agrees that it is not, and will not hold itself out as, an agent, partner, or co-venturer of the County, and that this Agreement is not intended to and does not create an agency, partnership, or joint venture between the Parties. 5. Project Administration The Parties agree that the Project as described in Exhibit A shall not be altered without a written amendment to this Agreement, signed by both the County and the Grantee. Grantee shall provide written reports to the County’s authorized representative in accordance with Exhibit B. 6. Hold Harmless Grantee shall indemnify and save harmless County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description resulting from this Agreement, the performance of any work or services performed of Grantee in furtherance of the Project under this Agreement, or payments made pursuant to this Agreement brought for, or on account of, any of the following: (A) injuries to or death of any person, including Grantee or its employees/officers/agents/volunteers; (B) damage to any property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging; (C) any sanctions, penalties, or claims of damages resulting from Grantee’s failure to comply with any applicable federal, state, or local laws or regulations; or 44 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 3 (D) any other loss or cost, including but not limited to that caused by the concurrent active or passive negligence of County and/or its officers, agents, employees, or servants. However, Grantee’s duty to indemnify and save harmless under this Section shall not apply to injuries or damage for which County has been found in a court of competent jurisdiction to be solely liable by reason of its own negligence or willful misconduct. The duty of Grantee to indemnify and save harmless as set forth by this Section shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. 7. Insurance a. General Requirements Prior to its receipt of any funds pursuant to this Grant Agreement, Grantee shall obtain all insurance required under this Section and such insurance shall be subject to the approval by County’s Risk Management, and Grantee shall use diligence to obtain such insurance and to obtain such approval. Grantee shall furnish County with certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and there shall be a specific contractual liability endorsement extending Grantee’s coverage to include the contractual liability assumed by Grantee pursuant to this Agreement. These certificates shall specify or be endorsed to provide that thirty (30) days’ notice must be given, in writing, to County of any pending change in the limits of liability or of any cancellation or modification of the policy. b. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance Grantee shall have in effect during the entire term of this Agreement workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance providing full statutory coverage. In signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies, as required by Section 1861 of the California Labor Code, that (a) it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and (b) it will comply with such provisions before commencing or continuing the performance of Project work for which it would receive grant funds. c. Liability Insurance Grantee shall take out and maintain during the term of this Agreement such bodily injury liability and property damage liability insurance as shall protect Grantee and all of its employees/officers/agents while performing work covered by this Agreement from any and all claims for damages for bodily injury, including accidental death, as well as any and all claims for property damage which may arise from Grantee’s operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Grantee, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, or an agent of either of them. Such insurance shall be combined single limit bodily injury and property damage for each occurrence and shall not be less than the amounts specified below: ☒ Comprehensive General Liability… $1,000,000 (Applies to all agreements) ☐ Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance… $1,000,000 (To be checked if motor vehicle used in performing services) ☐ Professional Liability………………. $1,000,000 (To be checked if Grantee is a licensed professional) County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants shall be named as additional insured on any such policies of insurance, which shall also contain a provision that (a) the insurance afforded thereby to 45 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 4 County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants shall be primary insurance to the full limits of liability of the policy and (b) if the County or its officers, agents, employees, and servants have other insurance against the loss covered by such a policy, such other insurance shall be excess insurance only. In the event of the breach of any provision of this Section, or in the event any notice is received which indicates any required insurance coverage will be diminished or canceled, County, at its option, may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, immediately declare a material breach of this Agreement and suspend any further payment pursuant to this Agreement. 8. Assignability and Subcontracting Grantee shall not assign this Agreement or any portion of it to a third party. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Grantee shall not subcontract with a third party to perform the Project. Any such assignment or subcontract without County’s prior written consent shall give County the right to automatically and immediately terminate this Agreement without penalty or advance notice and the County shall have the right to a refund of all funds disbursed under this Agreement. 9. Compliance With Laws All services to be performed by Grantee in connection with the Project shall be performed in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and municipal laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, but not limited to, any laws related to payment of prevailing wages pursuant to the California Labor Code. In connection with the Project, Grantee bears responsibility to obtain, at Grantee’s expense, any license, permit, or approval required from any agency. 10. Merger Clause; Amendments This Agreement, including Exhibits, constitutes the sole Agreement of the parties regarding the Grant, and correctly states the rights, duties, and obligations of each party as of this document’s date. In the event that any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification set forth in the body of this Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent with any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification in any Exhibit and/or Attachment to this Agreement, the provisions of the body of the Agreement shall prevail. Any prior agreement, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties concerning the Grant that are not expressly stated in this document are not binding. All subsequent modifications or amendments shall be in writing and signed by the parties. 11. Controlling Law; Venue The validity of this Agreement and of its terms, the rights and duties of the parties under this Agreement, the interpretation of this Agreement, the performance of this Agreement, and any other dispute of any nature arising out of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to its choice of law or conflict of law rules. Any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be venued either in the San Mateo County Superior Court or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 12. Notices Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be deemed to be properly given when both: (1) transmitted via email to the email address listed below; and (2) sent to the physical address listed below by either being deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, or deposited for overnight delivery, charges prepaid, with an established overnight courier that provides a tracking number showing confirmation of receipt. In the case of County, to: In the case of Grantee, to: County Executive’s Office Molly Ortiz, Administrative Assistant II City of South San Francisco Ernesto Lucero, Economic Development Manager 46 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 5 500 County Center, 5th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 363-1810 PO Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083-0711 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 829-6620 13. Electronic Signature Both County and Contractor wish to permit this Agreement and future documents relating to this Agreement to be digitally signed in accordance with California law and County’s Electronic Signature Administrative Memo. Any party to this Agreement may revoke such agreement to permit electronic signatures at any time in relation to all future documents by providing notice pursuant to this Agreement. 47 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 6 * * * THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES. NO FUNDS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED UNTIL THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE COUNTY’S AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE. For Grantee: City of South San Francisco _____________________________ (signature) Authorized Representative Grantee _____________________________ (please print name) Authorized Representative Grantee _______________ Date _____________________________ Name of Grantee _____________________________ (signature) City Attorney _____________________________ (attestation) City Clerk For County: ______________________________ (Signature) Authorized Designee County of San Mateo ROBERTO MANCHIA ____________________________ (please print name) Authorized Designee County of San Mateo ______________ Date CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ______________________________ Job Title (please print) 80125-6265 ______________________________ Budget Unit BOSD1 $250,000 and BOSD5 $20,000 ______________________________ Measure K JL Code 48 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 7 Exhibit A The County and Grantee agree that the grant funds shall only be used to further the goals of the following Project, described below and in the October 8, 2024 Board transmittal and resolution, incorporated herein by reference: Grantee will use grant funds to support the North San Mateo County Economic Advancement Center (“EAC”) located in South San Francisco. The EAC brings services closer to clients, and by making it convenient to get to and from the service center, increases opportunities for residents to access critical services. The Grantee will collaborate with Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center and JobTrain Inc. to provide services at the EAC. Renaissance will provide small business and entrepreneurship training to individuals interested in establishing or expanding a business. JobTrain will provide workforce development services. The grant will also fund the City’s Promotores, who will provide intake and social services navigation services to clients. The grant funds will be used as follows: Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center $184,165 JobTrain, Inc $75,835 City of South San Francisco (Promotores) $10,000 Total $270,000 In no event shall the County’s fiscal obligation under this Agreement exceed $270,000. 49 Agreement No. __________ Board Resolution No. ________ Page 8 Exhibit B In accordance with the terms of this Grant Agreement, Grantee will provide, or cause to be provided the services for the Project detailed in Exhibit A and will report back to the County regarding various performance measures including, but not limited to, those noted below. Such reporting data shall be delivered to the County no later than December 31, 2025. In addition, Grantee agrees to provide descriptive information about the Project funded by the Measure K grant upon reasonable request of the County, including, but not limited to, the County Executive’s Office, the County Communications Officer, or the Supervisorial District Office. Performance Measure Target 52 Additional clients served by Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center Complete 8 New businesses created as a result of services provided by Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center Complete 20 Individuals Placed Into Full-Time Employment by JobTrain Complete 20 Individuals Served by the Promotores Program Complete Payment will be made within 30 days of receipt of an adequate invoice by the County Executive’s Office, Accounting Unit. County shall have the right to withhold payment if County determines the quantity and/or quality of the work performed is unacceptable. Grantee shall provide County with a written itemized invoice that allows the County to reconcile the work performed. Grantee shall provide a description of monthly expenses, evidence of work performed, or of costs incurred, including, but not limited to, performance measures, timesheets, activity logs, copies of bills, and/or packing slips. Indirect costs are not eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. Grantee shall include a written certification that the costs were actually incurred for the Project and that the supporting documentation is true, correct and complete. All invoices shall include the agreement number, project location, dates of service and specified work completed. Pursuant to Section 2 of the Grant Agreement, County’s fiscal obligation shall not exceed $270,000. Remit invoices to: County Executive’s Office Molly Ortiz, Administrative Assistant II 500 County Center, 5th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 363-1810 50 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1020 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:9. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project -st1801 (Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer) RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project - st1801. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The adopted Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (“Plan”)identifies Grand Avenue as a major component in revitalizing the City of South San Francisco’s (“City”)Downtown area.The Plan’s vision for Grand Avenue is to create an attractive and lively pedestrian environment,invigorate the existing and new businesses,and improve safety and connectivity to and from the Downtown area while enhancing the unique character of Downtown and the City.The Plan provided schematic details of a realignment and redesign of Grand Avenue.The Grand Avenue Streetscape Project (“Project”) between Spruce Avenue and Airport Boulevard scope focused on: ·The intersection of Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue to provide a safe pedestrian crossing between the Downtown area and the new Caltrain Station western plaza; and ·A community engaged design that details streetscape strategy for Grand Avenue.This included wider sidewalks and sidewalk treatments,new bike lanes,a landscaping palette for plantings and street furniture,and guidance for street and pedestrian lighting-once again creating a vibrant and successful community resource and source of pride. On February 14,2018,City Council authorized a consulting services agreement with SWA Group to perform the planning and concept phase of Grand Avenue and to create the construction documents of the Phase 1 portion which is Grand Avenue from Airport Boulevard to Cypress Avenue. On January 15,2020,City Council held a study session on the conceptual Grand Avenue Streetscape Master Plan designs and cost estimates.(See attachment 1)The Consultant provided two Alternative designs to highlight different visions for the downtown area and a Grand Avenue and Airport Boulevard intersection design.The Consultant provided cost estimates for both Alternatives and the intersection to provide the City with an understanding of the costs associated with different design choices. Future Constraints & Issues The current level of the Grand Avenue Streetscape Master Plan does not address the critical challenges of significant grading,utility relocation,legacy underground infrastructure conflicts,and ADA-compliant grading to ensure conformance with existing storefront entrances.Ensuring ADA accessibility at each store entrance will present a major obstacle that the Project must resolve during the construction document phase.Additionally,addressing underground infrastructure conflicts is crucial for the Project’s success and long-term functionality. The concept plan proposes to modify on-street parking along Grand Avenue to improve the pedestrian environment through reduction of parking spaces.The proposed modification includes changing from angled to parallel parking,which was vetted through the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan;however,until the parking spaces are removed physically, City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™51 File #:24-1020 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:9. was vetted through the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan;however,until the parking spaces are removed physically, the community may not understand the full impact. The City’s Green Infrastructure goals regarding stormwater treatment are an ongoing difficulty for the City to comply with.The revised streetscape could include stormwater treatment within the landscaping portions of the street.Additional stormwater treatment measures within the street will increase the cost of landscape but would be less expensive and fit in better when installed at the same time as the new Grand Avenue streetscape than installed at a later time. Funding Opportunity - Partner with C/CAG The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (“C/CAG”)is currently working on a grant application with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)for the Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program.C/CAG has identified South San Francisco’s Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project as an eligible project to include in a larger effort they are supporting in multiple Cities in San Mateo County.Grand Avenue was studied as part of the San Mateo Countywide Sustainable Streets Masterplan https://ccag.ca.gov/countywide-sustainable-streets-master-plan/ (attachment 2). Staff recommends that C/CAG apply for a grant application to fund the Project through design along Grand Avenue from Spruce Avenue to Airport Boulevard.This process centers around public engagement in designing a project to meet the needs and vision of the community. The anticipated funding request will be in the neighborhood of $3 Million. FISCAL IMPACT Staff continuously scan for various grant funding opportunities.Upon successful award of grant(s),staff will work with the City Council as necessary for budget appropriation to ensure sufficient funds to cover a local match. The Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program does not require a local match.No additional funding is required at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this action will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by maintaining and improving infrastructure to serve the public. CONCLUSION City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project - st1801. Attachments: 1.Grand Avenue Streetscape Master Plan Preliminary Designs (Council Presentation 1/15/2020) 2.SSF Grand Ave SMC SSMP City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™52 Grand Avenue Master Plan SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Sherwood Engineers Fehr & Peers 53 SCOPE Master Plan Scope Phase I Construction Scope Grand & Airport Traffic Study Scope Scope 54 100% 2,059 GRAND AVE IS ACCESSIBLE WITHIN A 15 MINUTE WALK. NEW UNITS Development Context0’ 40’ 80’ 160’ 94 69 46 38 81 97 157 195 260 283 294 445 5 m i n . W a l k i n g D i s t a n c e New Station DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT 55 Hisense - 200 Linden Ave 488 Linden Avenue 150 Airport Blvd Cadence Phase 2 - 405 Cypress Ave 255 Cypress Ave 7 S. Linden Avenue Cadence Phase 1 - Airport & Miller Ave 200 Airport Blvd 124 Airport Blvd & 100 Produce Ave Development Context NEW DEVELOPMENTS 56 Existing Building Character EXISTING BUILDING CHARACTER 57 Existing Conditions EXISTING CONDITIONS 58 GRAND AVE. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Speci c Plan + Proposed 59 SPECIFIC PLAN STREET STUDY 15 ft 8 ft 6 ft 22 ft Street trees Parallel parking Section A Bike lane 6 ft 8 ft 15 ft Specific Plan Street Study: Grand Avenue Section Improvements Existing - Angled Parking Vetted through the approval of the DSASP 0’ 4’ 8’ 16’ Proposed Grand Avenue Section Improvements 60 Proposed Parking Space Count Current Design Approach: 140 -1 from DSASP 0’ 40’ 80’ 18 12 19 14 04 17 22 21 13 160’ MASTER PLAN OVERALL PARKING COUNT 163 Existing 141 DSASP -22 spaces 61 GRAND AND AIRPORT INTERSECTIONExisting Conditions Future Plaza 62 DASP INTERSECTION DESIGN Specific Plan Intersection Study: Airport Boulevard 63 CURRENT INTERSECTION DESIGN Future Plaza To Caltrain Station Protected Intersection Seperated Bikeway To Downtown Dedicated Bike Lanes Lane Direction Bus Stop Current Intersection Design CY P R E S S A V E . N. T . S . Airport Boulevard Context Current Intersection format is unfavorable to drivers between a 35-55 sec delay. Gas Station Entry 64 Airport and Grand Bus Stop Street LampsTwo-Way Bike LaneExisting Gas Station Planted Median Bike Median Unit Paving Crosswalk & Bike Lanes Cost Estimate: $812,000 (Alternate A), $1,165,000 (Alternate B) 15 ft. Median 65 Airport and Grand Crosswalk and Bike Path Bus Stop Street LampsTwo-Way Bike LaneExisting Gas Station Unit Paving Crosswalk, Street, & Bike Lanes 66 GRAND AVENUE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 67 ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 2 ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 1ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 3 ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 2 ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 1ENLARGEMENT SEGMENT 3 AI R P O R T B L V D CY P R E S S A V E LI N D E N A V E MA P L E A V E SP R U C E A V E AI R P O R T B L V D CY P R E S S A V E LI N D E N A V E MA P L E A V E SP R U C E A V E Illustrative Master Plans0’ 40’ 80’ 160’ ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLANS AL T E R N A T E A AL T E R N A T E B 68 Entry signage Specimen tree Unit Paving Crosswalk, Street, & Bike Lanes Unit Paving Sidewalk Class I bike lanes Existing street lamp AIRPORT BLVD. / GRAND AVE ENTRY ALTERNATE A Airport Blvd and Grand Ave Entry 69 Entry signage Class I bike lane Unit paving crosswalkUnit paving sidewalk Unit Paving CrosswalkUnit Paving Sidewalk Planters AIRPORT BLVD. / GRAND AVE ENTRY ALTERNATE B Airport Blvd and Grand Ave Entry **View does not reflect updated streetscape. 70 Graphic Street Name Street LampsContemporary FurnishingsBollards Concrete Flush intersection Unit Paving Unit Paving Crosswalk, Street, & Bike Lanes Unit Paving Sidewalk GRAND AVE. AND CYPRESS AVE. ALTERNATE A Grand Ave. and Cypress Ave.71 Dedicated bike laneLandscape buffers Curbed intersection Special paving Unit Paving Crosswalk, & Intersection GRAND AVE. AND CYPRESS AVE. ALTERNATE B Grand Ave. and Cypress Ave.72 GRAND AVE. STREETSCAPE ALTERNATE A Grand Ave. Streetscape Unit paversLandscape buffer 45° bike parking Dedicated bike lane Unit Paving Parking & Bike LanesConcrete Sidewalk 9’-10’5’Unit Paving Strip 73 Grand Ave. Streetscape GRAND AVE. STREETSCAPE ALTERNATE B Mid-block crosswalk Parallel parkingBike rackPaving Bands/ Parking access Unit Paving Bands to Access Parking Unit Paving Sidewalk 74 GRAND AVE. PLAYGROUND ALTERNATE A Play structure Art muralCatenary lights Pop-up cafe Grand Ave. Playground 75 Seat walls PlaygroundArt mural Unit Paving Sidewalk GRAND AVE. PLAYGROUND ALTERNATE B Grand Ave. Playground 76 HOW TO PROGRAM THE SPACE? PLAYGROUND DOG PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN ART GALLERY FITNESSSOCIAL SPACE Program Alternative for Paseos PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES FOR PASEOS 77 PL A Y G R O U N D DO G P A R K CO M M U N I T Y G A R D E N SO C I A L S P A C E AR T G A L L E R T Y FI T N E S S Paseos 78 Flexible stage area Plaza Bus enclosure Event plaza Bus stop Street furnishingSeating Catenary lights Street tree Removable bollards Specimen tree Specimen tree Terraced seatingLawn terraces Sloped lawn Mid-block crossing Specimen tree Bus stop Bus stop SeatingStreet tree Paving bands SeatingStreet tree Strolling garden MA P L E A V E MA P L E A V E SP R U C E A V E SP R U C E A V E AL T E R N A T E A AL T E R N A T E B Enlargement Plan Segment 30’ 16’ 32’ 64’ ENLARGEMENT PLAN SEGMENT 3 79 Extasi bench Escofet Connect 2.0 Bus Shelter Landscape Forms Ride Bike Rack Landscape Forms Harpo Bench Santa Cole Integral Color Top Cast Finish Concrete Precast Concrete Unit Paving Open Pillars Streetlife Rama Area Light Chase Park Litter Landscape Forms Precast Concrete Unit Paving Timber Seating Custom Melville Bench Landscape Forms Poe Little Receptacle Landscape Forms Ashbery Area Light Landscape Forms California Round QCP Emerson Bike Rack Landscape Forms AL T E R N A T E A AL T E R N A T E B Materials and Furnishing Collection MATERIALS AND FURNISHING COLLECTION 80 Options Cost Estimates and Summary Alternative B Base Scope Estimate: $15,639,000* + Large Paseo Playground Option: $1,250,000* + Small Paseo Option: $407,000* + Intersection Option: $1,165,000* TOTAL COST ESTIMATE: $17,211,000* Alternative A Base Scope Estimate: $18,534,000* + Large Paseo Playground Option: $1,172,000* + Small Paseo Option: $419,000* + Intersection Option: $821,000 * TOTAL COST ESTIMATE: $20,946,000* • Unit Paver Material Used in Roadway + Cast-in-place concrete side- walk pavers • Bike Lanes Utilize New Paver Material • Modern Street Signage Markers • Linear Park • Modern Furnishings • Flushed Intersections/Raised Crosswalks + Removable Ballards • Brick Material Used at Intersections • Symmetrical Tree Pattern • Entry Signage Retains Brick Feature • Bike Paths Over Asphalt • Strolling Park • Pavings Bands • Curbed Intersections SUMMARY *Cost estimates as determined by M Lee Corp Preliminrary Estimate of Probable Construction Cost based on 90% Master Plan (12/22/2019) 81 NEXT STEPS Community Process Construction Drawings Phase 1 82 U S - 1 0 1 PROJECT SITE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO E-74 San Mateo Countywide Sustainable Streets Master Plan Grand Avenue South San Francisco South San Francisco has a goal to revitalize, improve, and support the downtown area. The City plans to improve circulation and connectivity and to create an attractive and vibrant pedestrian environment along the Grand Avenue corridor. This sustainable street concept envisions a reconfiguration of Grand Ave between Maple Ave and Linden Ave with increased pedestrian spaces and integrated stormwater management within green infrastructure facilities. This project would realign parking from angles to parallel on both sides of Grand Ave to allow space for a bike lane and increased pedestrian areas. The parking lane is proposed to be permeable pavement which will provide infiltration of runoff. The mid-block area is proposed to include a wider sidewalk and colored paving within the driving lanes to promote traffic calming and increased pedestrian safety. Sidewalk and pedestrian spaces will be installed as boardwalks overlaying bioretention planters. This will provide large stormwater facilities that can manage roadway and sidewalk runoff while preserving space for pedestrian use along the busy commercial and mixed-use corridor. Street trees will be integrated along the parking lane and within the pedestrian boardwalk. A total of 5,600 square feet of permeable pavement is proposed and a total of 10,200 square feet of bioretention planter integrated in boardwalks are proposed. These are estimated to capture stormwater runoff from approximately 1.2 acres of roadway, providing capture of 2.5 acre-feet of runoff per year. This project is expected to retain 68% or runoff. Concept Description Site Characteristics In Priority Development Area Yes Watershed Colma Creek Green Infrastructure Performance Drainage Management Area 1.2 ac Annual Runoff Captured 2.5 ac-ft Bioretention Area / Storage Volume 10,200 sf / 0.35 ac-ft Permeable Pavement Area / Storage Volume 5,600 sf / 0.08 ac-ft Active Transportation Performance Change in Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) LTS 4 to LTS 3 Increase in % Likely Bicyclist Usage 11% Key Transportation Benefits »Reduced pedestrian crossing distance »Increased pedestrian space »Traffic calming »Added bike lane [ ] 83 0 80’20’40’60’ A B C E D F E-75 Typical Cross Section a-a: Grand Avenue 6’ Bike Lane 6’ Bike Lane 22’ Grand Avenue 12’ Bioretention Planter 12’ Bioretention Planter 11’ Sidewalk 11’ Sidewalk A D A A E D F F C C B B a b a b GRAND AVENUE LI N D E N A V E N U E M A P L E A V E N U E Concept Site Plan Detail: Grand Avenue, South San Francisco KEY SITE IMPROVEMENTS Proposed bioretention planter Proposed suspended pavement over bioretention planter Proposed permeable pavement Proposed bike lane Proposed plaza crossing Existing bus stop Existing Pedestrian Space Added Pedestrian Space Parking and Roadway Area 84 Site Elements Tree dividers between parking stalls Paver sidewalk and furnishing zone Flex-use parking lane converting to outdoor seating Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n d e s i g n Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n d e s i g n Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n d e s i g n Permeable pavement parking and step-out zone Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n d e s i g n E-76 Grand Avenue South San Francisco Typical Cross Section b-b: Grand Avenue 6’ Bike Lane 6’ Bike Lane 22’ Grand Avenue 8’ Permeable Pavement Parking 8’ Permeable Pavement Parking 15’ Sidewalk 15 Sidewalk 85 E-77 Site Elements Concept Perspectives Downtown street plaza space Downtown street plaza space Boardwalk over bioretention basin as sidewalk space Boardwalk & paver sidewalk space with protective bollards Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n D e s i g n Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n D e s i g n Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n D e s i g n Ke v i n R o b e r t P e r r y , U r b a n R a i n D e s i g n Existing condition, Grand Ave between Maple Ave and Linden Ave Proposed condition 86 This is a planning-level cost estimate ($2020) for design and construction. Soft costs for City administration and project management and post-construction operations and maintenance are not included. Other factors that may affect the cost of future construction include escalation and market conditions.E-78 Increased Trees Shade for walking comfort Heat and carbon emission reduction Neighborhood Beautification Increased vegetation Provide engaging streets to walk on Reestablishes Natural Hydrology Bioretention planters capture and infiltrate stormwater Project Benefits Groundwater Recharge Recharge of the Westside Groundwater Basin Walkability & Safety Curb extensions for safer street crossing Connection to commercial areas Prioritize Non-Motorized Users Promote more active transportation Planning-Level Cost Estimate Bikeability & Safety Increased protected bike lanes Increased bike-share roads Bike Network Part of larger network for connectivity Promote biking with more connectivity Grand Avenue South San Francisco DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UNIT COST QUANTITY SUBTOTAL Utilities Protection/Relocation $120,000 LS 1 $120,000 Sawcutting Pavement $12 LF 2,600 $31,200 Concrete Demo, Excavation & Offhaul $11 SF 15,600 $171,600 Planter Excavation & Offhaul $70 CY 980 $68,600 Planter Curb & 36" Sidewalls $160 LF 620 $99,200 Planter Curb & Gutter & 36" Sidewalls $180 LF 600 $108,000 Bio-soil Media $250 CY 390 $97,500 Underdrains $6 SF 2,730 $16,400 Drain Rock Subbase $160 CY 490 $78,400 Bioretention Plantings & Mulch $25 SF 1,670 $41,800 Storm Drain Connections $7,500 EA 4 $30,000 Bioretention Curb Inlet $1,500 EA 10 $15,000 Permanent Tree Protection $165 LF 192 $31,700 Flush Curb Ribbon $60 LF 1,570 $94,200 Permeable Pavement $25 SF 6,020 $150,500 Bikelane Striping $12 SF 5,100 $61,200 Irrigation System $13,240 EA 6 $79,400 Traffic Sign Relocation $900 EA 6 $5,400 Trees $1,500 EA 22 $33,000 Boardwalk Surfacing $50 SF 5,320 $266,000 Plaza Road Paint $5 SF 5,500 $27,500 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,627,000 Traffic Control $81,350 Mobilization (10% construction)$163,000 Contingency (30% construction)$488,000 Design Fees (15% total)$354,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST (DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION)$2,713,000 87 E-79 This project concept is presented for discussion only. This project concept is planning-level and subject to revision as additional information becomes available. Factors to be considered during design of this project include but are not limited to the following: »Infiltration Potential. The hydrologic soil group is unknown along Grand Ave. A geotechnical investigation will be conducted during design development, including site-specific borings and infiltration tests, to ensure facilities are designed appropriately. This design incorporates bioretention below boardwalk areas within the sidewalk resulting in a large amount of facility area relative to the roadway drainage area. Therefore, bioretention facilities will likely be able to manage roadway runoff without the need for underdrains even if slow draining soils are present on site. »Utility Conflict. Initial utility assessments were conducted for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water mains. Bioretention facilities are proposed in configurations that minimize disruption of sewer and water lines. Other utilities such as power and gas were not available for consideration during the development of this concept and should be assessed during design development. »Street Trees. Trees are proposed within the parking lane. These will be protected with curbs or fencing. They are proposed to divide every two parking spots. The trees will provide shade and assist in stormwater management within the roadway. »Maintenance. Bioretention planters located under pedestrian boardwalks will require minimal maintenance as they will not be planted and smaller exposed bioretention planters will serve as the inlet and outlet of these systems. The inlet planters will capture the majority of the sediment load and prevent the downstream planters below the boardwalk from needing frequent maintenance. Additional Considerations 88 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1021 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:9a. Resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program to support Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project - st1801. WHEREAS,the adopted Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (“Plan”)identifies Grand Avenue as a major component in revitalizing the City of South San Francisco’s (“City”) Downtown area; and WHEREAS,the Plan’s vision for Grand Avenue is to create an attractive and lively pedestrian environment,invigorate the existing and new businesses,and improve safety and connectivity to and from the Downtown area,while enhancing the unique character of Downtown and the City; and WHEREAS,the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County “C/CAG”is currently working on a grant application with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency “EPA”for the Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program “Grant”; and WHEREAS,C/CAG has identified including South San Francisco’s Grand Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project as an eligible project to include in a larger effort they are supporting in multiple Cities in San Mateo County.Grand Avenue was studied as part of the large San Mateo Countywide Sustainable Streets Masterplan; and WHEREAS, there is no local match requirement for the Grant; and WHEREAS,staff requests the City Council approve C/CAG’s grant application to the Community Change Grant program; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby authorizes an application for Environmental and Climate Justice Community Change Grants Program for the Grand Avenue Streetscape; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions consistent with the intention of the resolution and accompanying staff report. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™89 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-990 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:10. Report regarding a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving to enable Grand Avenue Library to update its furnishings and play equipment in the children’s area of the library. (Valerie Sommer, Library Director) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving to support the purchase of new furnishings and play equipment for Grand Avenue Library and amending the Library Department’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (FY24-25) Operating Budget via Budget Amendment Number 25.019. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Library Department has been awarded $10,000 from Sunlight Giving.Funds will be used to purchase child -friendly furnishings,storage equipment,and toys designed to enrich independent play and support ongoing children’s programs.The stated goals of the grant are to stimulate children’s imagination,support social skill development, and enhance children’s learning. Since its 2016 redesign,the Grand Avenue Library’s children’s area has been in almost constant use,with toys and furnishings seeing significant wear.This grant will allow the library to replace aging toys and furnishings and identify optimal storage solutions for the new equipment.Furthermore,toys and play activities are incorporated into the branch’s four weekly story times that serve approximately 125 community members per week;new equipment will enhance the library’s ability to draw children and families to these programs that support learning and early literacy. FISCAL IMPACT Grant funds will be used to amend the Library Department’s current FY 24-25 Operating Budget per Budget Amendment Number 25.019. Receipt of these funds does not commit the City to ongoing funding. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN This grant supports priority #6 of the Strategic Plan:Community Connections,which includes “key social, recreational and educational programs…including cultural activities,special events,in-person learning and enrichment classes for all ages, and health, wellness, and STEAM programs.” CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council accept $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving and amend the Library Department’s FY 24-25 Operating Budget via Budget Amendment Number 25.019.Receipt of these funds will support the Library’s ability to better serve local children and families by enabling the library to offer up-to-date play equipment.New toys and furnishings will enhance patrons’experiences when attending City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™90 File #:24-990 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:10. up-to-date play equipment.New toys and furnishings will enhance patrons’experiences when attending educational programs and will allow for a greater degree of independent and social play at the library. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™91 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-993 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:10a. Resolution authorizing the acceptance of $10,000 in grant funding from Sunlight Giving to enable Grand Avenue Library to update its furnishings and play equipment in the children’s area of the library. WHEREAS,The City of South San Francisco (“City”)Library Department is dedicated to assisting all residents in locating information and inspiring learning in a comfortable, accessible environment; and WHEREAS,Sunshine Giving awarded a grant to the City in the amount of $10,000 to support the purchase of new furnishings and play equipment for the Grand Avenue Library; and WHEREAS,funding from the Sunlight Giving grant will be used to purchase child-friendly furnishings, storage equipment,and toys designed to enrich independent play and support ongoing children’s imagination, support social skill development, and enhance children’s learning; and WHEREAS,staff recommends the acceptance of the grant funding in the amount of $10,000 from Sunlight Giving to enable Grand Avenue Library to update its furnishings and play equipment in the children’s area of the library; and WHEREAS,the grant funds will be used to amend Fiscal Year (FY)2024-2025 Operating Budget of the Library Department via Budget Amendment 25.019. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby accept $10,000 in grant funding from the California State Library and approve Budget Amendment Number 25.019 to amend the Library Department’s FY 2024-2025 Operating Budget to reflect an increase of $10,000. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™92 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-923 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:11. Report regarding a resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and associated Budget Amendment Number 25.015.(John Wilson, Associate Engineer) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State- Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and associated Budget Amendment Number 25.015. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In 2022,the City of South San Francisco completed a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP),utilizing a comprehensive,data-driven analysis of five years of crash data to pinpoint priority areas,high-crash locations, and other high-risk areas throughout the City.The analysis revealed a concentration of crashes at intersections, particularly signalized ones.Of the 64 signalized intersections within the City,173 crashes resulting in injuries or fatalities were recorded during the study period. The Junipero Serra Boulevard/Arroyo Drive intersection was identified as a high-priority location for the installation of a new traffic signal.Between 2017 and 2019,four crashes occurred at this intersection,all of which could have been mitigated by a traffic signal.A signal warrant evaluation confirmed that the intersection meets the requirements outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Additionally,signalized intersections on Grand Avenue,including those at Spruce Avenue,Maple Avenue,and Linden Avenue,were identified for signal timing improvements.These intersections,located in the City's downtown area,experience a high volume of mixed traffic,including vehicles,pedestrians,bicyclists,and transit users.There are also several schools and senior residential facilities nearby.Between 2017 and 2019, nine pedestrian-or bicycle-related crashes were reported.Modifying the signal timing to provide pedestrians with a head start is expected to improve pedestrian visibility and reduce pedestrian-related crashes by 60%. To further enhance safety,all 64 signalized intersections will be retrofitted with yellow retroreflective backplates.These backplates are critical for improving the visibility of signal heads,particularly during sunrise and sunset,when visibility is often compromised.This enhancement is anticipated to reduce rear-end collisions and improve overall safety citywide. The Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Project (tr2403)was established to implement these essential safety measures.It includes the installation of a new traffic signal at Junipero Serra Boulevard/Arroyo Drive,signal timing modifications at the Grand Avenue intersections,and installing retroreflective backplates at all applicable traffic signals within the City. In September 2022,the City applied for funding through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)Cycle 11.In March 2023,Caltrans notified the City that the project had been selected for funding.The project was included in the 2023-24 Capital Improvement ProgramCity of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™93 File #:24-923 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:11. project had been selected for funding.The project was included in the 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget, reflecting the City’s contribution. Design efforts commenced in September 2023,with city funds allocated for this phase.The design is expected to conclude in October 2024.As we prepare to enter the construction phase,staff will request a funding allocation of $1,527,120 from the State to support project construction. FISCAL IMPACT The total estimated cost for the Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Project (CIP No.tr2403)is $2,027,120.The project will be funded through a $1,527,120 grant from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and $500,000 from the Citywide Traffic Impact Fees. The existing project budget for this project is $500,000,of which $185,540 is associated with the design phase. The remaining $314,460 from the current budget will be assigned to the construction phase. Budget Amendment Number 25.015 has been reserved to incorporate the grant revenues and adjust expenditure levels in the FY 2024-25 budget accordingly. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this action will contribute to the City’s Strategic Plan outcome of improved Quality of Life by maintaining and improving infrastructure to serve the public. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and approval of associated Budget Amendment Number 25.015. Attachment: 1)Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™94 TR2403 Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Project and Caltrans State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant October 9, 2024 95 2 Signal Backplate 96 3 Leading Pedestrian Interval 97 4 New Traffic Signal 98 5 Project Map Leading Ped Interval Backplate Upgrades New Traffic Signal JSB/Arroyo 99 6 Funding Plan 100 7Schedule Advertising and bidding (November 2024 – Spring 2025) Construction (Spring - Fall 2025) 7 Design (Finishing October 2024) 101 8Questions Staff recommends accepting grant and budget amendment. 8 102 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-924 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:11a. Resolution authorizing acceptance of a $1,527,120 grant award and funding agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funding and approval of Budget Amendment Number 25.015. WHEREAS,the City of South San Francisco has identified key recommendations to improve road user safety; and WHEREAS,the City has developed tr2403,the Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Project (Project)to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Junipero Serra Boulevard and Arroyo Drive,modify signal timing at three intersections on Grand Avenue,and install yellow reflective backplates at all applicable traffic signals in the City; and WHEREAS, it will cost $2,027,120 to complete the Project; and WHEREAS, the City seeks $2,027,120 for the Project; and WHEREAS,the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)issued a Call for Projects for the Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program; and WHEREAS,Caltrans requires the City to commit to provide matching funds in the amount of 10%of the construction phase costs, or at least $169,680; and WHEREAS,Caltrans notified the City that the Project application was selected for $1,527,120 in program funding; and WHEREAS, the City has already budgeted $500,000 of City funds for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing board of the City of South San Francisco: 1.Authorizes the City Manager,or designee,to accept the grant and execute a funding agreement or MOU and any amendments with the California Department of Transportation to encumber up to $1,527,120 in City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™103 File #:24-924 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:11a. Caltrans Cycle 11 State-Funded Highway Safety Improvement Program funds; 2.Commits to completing the project,including contributing 10%of the construction phase costs,or at least $169,680; 3.Approves Budget Amendment Number 25.015 to adjust projected revenue and expenditure for fiscal year 2024-25. 4.Authorizes the City Manager to take any other related actions consistent with the intention of the staff report or this resolution. ***** City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™104 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-980 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12. Report regarding a study session and potential introduction of an ordinance amending Title 8 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to add Chapter 8.78 to regulate certain private development projects by withholding the certificate of occupancy or building permit final when an owner or contractor has unpaid final wage theft judgments.(Tony Rozzi, Deputy Economic and Community Development Director) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council discuss the proposed ordinance,take any public comments,and direct staff on next steps,which could include revisions to or introduction of the associated Ordinance for adoption. BACKGROUND During the City Council retreat on January 27,2024,Council directed staff to review two requests by labor advocates:(1)a healthcare and apprenticeship ordinance for all new construction projects in South San Francisco and (2) a specific ordinance enforcing wage theft judgements in construction. Since the Council retreat, City staff has done the following: 1.Hired Strategic Economics to analyze the HARDHATS ordinance from the City of Berkeley (this ordinance mandates healthcare and apprenticeship training standards for new construction)to identify how new labor standards affect project feasibility (See Attachment 1 for project scope).This analysis will look at typical development scenarios in South San Francisco and evaluate if the new standards have an economic impact and/or require impact fee waivers to preserve feasibility; and 2.Drafted an ordinance for local enforcement of wage theft when staff has received a complaint of an unpaid wage theft judgment with a contractor or subcontractor. Tonight’s study session focuses on the draft wage theft ordinance,enforcement process,and thresholds for applicability.If Council has specific edits or requests that require further study,staff will return at a future meeting.If this ordinance fits Council’s direction from the retreat and individual discussions,it can be introduced as an ordinance (or with slight modifications). Separately,staff will return to Council with an update on Strategic Economics’feasibility analysis and implications for potential healthcare and apprenticeship standards for new construction. DISCUSSION What is wage theft? As defined by the National Employment Law Project < https://www.nelp.org/wage-theft-is-when-an-employer-withholds-benefits-such-as-breaks-or-compensation-that -an-employee-has-already-worked-for/>: wage theft most commonly comes in the form of minimum wage violations and overtime violations but wage theft can come in many forms, including: City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™105 File #:24-980 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12. ·Paying less than minimum wage; ·Not paying appropriate overtime; ·Withholding final paycheck after quitting a job; ·Withholding tips; ·Asking for unpaid work (labor while off the clock); ·Cutting lunch breaks short; ·Asking employee to make work-related purchases without reimbursement (tools or uniforms); or ·Misclassifying an employee to avoid rules and regulations. In 2021,the U.S.Department of Labor reported a total of $230 million recovered in back pay for employees. The most affected employees were food service workers,followed closely by construction workers.The two industries together made up a total of over $70 million in back wage recovery nationwide,but some estimates (a 2017 analysis)suggest up to $2 billion are stolen each year from employees in California across all sectors (see link in Attachments). Recently,the California Department of Industrial Relations and the Labor Commissioner’s Office awarded $8.5 million to public prosecutors to develop and implement wage theft ordinances in their communities.San Mateo County District Attorney was awarded almost $740,000 in late May 2024. What does the State currently do? When the Labor Commissioner’s Office determines that unpaid wages are due to workers,an Order,Decision, or Award (ODA)or Notice of Findings (NOF)is issued.If the employer that owes the wages fails to pay the workers, a judgment is issued to help the worker recover the wages. These judgments are court orders to pay wages and other monies owed.Once the Labor Commissioner ODAs and NOFs are converted into a judgment,they can be enforced using the same mechanisms as any other civil judgment.These include court orders to pay,violation of which would constitute contempt of court;conversion to commercial debt and collections; and if possible, liens on property. The state has proactively strengthened wage theft enforcement with recent bills,including 2022’s AB 1003 which deems wage theft over $950 as grand theft. How would a local ordinance help resolve wage theft? Since the State makes these judgements,local ordinances focus on withholding local approvals that may incentivize resolution.They can be particularly effective if a contractor or subcontractor working in the City has a state issued judgement of wage theft. This draft ordinance focuses on a narrow band of wage theft actors only -Owners or contractors working on a new private development project.This ordinance would not apply to existing business operators primarily because there are significant and costly barriers to enforcement against those -for most existing businesses,the only tools are to withhold a business license and/or refer to Code Enforcement. The benefit of this approach practically is that the building permit and certificate of occupancy give the City another tool to deploy that we don’t have with generally operating businesses.Determining a wage theft violation will require access to records.The City will be more likely to obtain the documents from a contractor or subcontractor that it won’t have with a generally operating business.It also has a greater ability to get any violation corrected since without a Certificate of Occupancy or Building Permit Final,most contractors are not City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™106 File #:24-980 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12. paid. The City can use Code Enforcement to address wage theft by generally operating businesses,but the investigation requires access to records that a business might refuse to provide -a court order is required to access the records.Unfortunately,these are complicated legal cases -the City has to determine there’s enough evidence to support imposing the penalties for enforcement. As the San Mateo County District Attorney ramps up their local enforcement of wage theft through a recent grant, staff hopes that this draft ordinance can be expanded to cover general operating businesses, too. How would our local ordinance operate? The Economic and Community Development Department,with assistance from the City Attorney’s office, would manage the following: 1.As a condition of approval for any building permit required for a project,an applicant shall sign an acknowledgement that: ·The owner,contractor,and all subcontractors on the project will comply with all applicable provisions of this ordinance and the California Labor Code; ·The owner and contractor are responsible for ensuring that the contractor and all subcontractors on the project pay any wage theft judgments that have been entered against them either before or during the construction of the project; and ·A violation will result in withholding of the certificate of occupancy/building permit final, whichever is applicable, at the conclusion of the project. 2.Prior to issuance of approval of certificate of occupancy or building permit final for a project,owner shall provide to the city a pay transparency certification that the contractor and any subcontractor under penalty of perjury that includes: ·A statement that the owner,contractor,and any subcontractors have no unpaid wage theft judgments; and ·A statement that employees were notified of pay practices or a valid collective bargaining agreement. 3.The ordinance would be complaint driven -an outstanding wage theft judgement must be submitted to the Building Official prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy or Building Permit Final. 4.The City Attorney would be responsible for verifying the judgment and using the State’s database (< https://cadir.my.site.com/s>)to confirm it remained outstanding. Determination of a judgment can take years, however, and an allegation would not be sufficient to withhold a local certificate of occupancy or building permit final. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™107 File #:24-980 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12. Who would be exempt? The ordinance is focused on a slim band of potential offenders -new construction contractors and subcontractors.This is primarily because enforcement on existing businesses is quite difficult.As mentioned, staff sought a solution that would help retail,restaurant,and hotel workers since these are large employment sectors in South San Francisco.An existing grocery store that conducts wage theft does not require much in the way of local approvals,however.Aside from a business license,this business may only be subject to code enforcement or entitlement revocation hearings.In lieu of a perfect ordinance,this draft focuses on the construction trades, which are heavily represented in wage theft claims. This ordinance would exempt the following: ·A project consisting of less than fifteen thousand square feet of new construction or remodeling. Some city ordinances also exempt projects with a project labor agreement or a collective bargaining agreement -while this was considered,it didn’t seem appropriate to exempt any construction employer from this ordinance. What do other cities do? The City of San Jose has a comprehensive wage theft ordinance for new construction that informed the City’s draft ordinance.Additionally,the City of Fresno has begun enforcement with both civil and criminal charges. With the recent grant to the San Mateo County District Attorney,staff is hopeful that identified and sustained wage theft complaints may also be directed to the San Mateo County office for enforcement. FISCAL IMPACT There is no direct fiscal impact anticipated with adopting the proposed Ordinance,however,the City Attorney’s office would be the lead hearing body for evaluating local complaints of an unpaid wage theft judgement.City Attorney staff time would be absorbed through existing budget,developer paid fees,or reimbursement agreements with certain entitlement projects. CONCLUSION A local wage theft ordinance can have some beneficial impact,if a contractor or subcontractor is completing a construction project while having an outstanding wage theft judgement on file with the Labor Commissioner’s Office.In this circumstance,the City can withhold a Building Permit Final for new shell construction or a Certificate of Occupancy for a major tenant improvement project exceeding 15,000 square feet. The drafted ordinance can be modified or introduced for adoption at the discretion of the City Council. Attachments 1.Strategic Economics Scope of Work 2.Staff Presentation 3.Economic Policy Institute Study: https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/links/S241812-LINK1.PDF#page=11 < https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/links/S241812-LINK1.PDF> Associated Files 1.Legistar File 24-982 - Ordinance City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™108 STRATEGIC ECONOMICS | 2991 SHATTUCK AVE. BERKELEY, CA. 94705 | 510.647.5291 MEMORANDUM To: Tony Rozzi, Deputy Director, City of South San Francisco From: Derek W. Braun, Principal Date: May 13, 2024 Project: Analysis of Labor Standards Impacts on the Financial Feasibility of Development Projects Subject: Proposed Scope and Budget This memorandum describes a proposed scope of work, budget, and timeline for Strategic Economics to complete an analysis of the impacts of potential labor standards requirements on the financial feasibility of housing development in South San Francisco. The City of South San Francisco requested this scope and budget for consideration of potential approaches for analyzing new labor standards requirements. The study would be used to inform deliberations regarding adoption of new labor standards requirements for development projects in South San Francisco. As described in the following scope, the analysis would make use of content and analyses currently being prepared by Strategic Economics as part of the commercial linkage fee nexus study and development feasibility analysis for the City of South San Francisco. Analyses for that study are largely completed, and Strategic Economics is currently drafting a report describing the results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Strategic Economics would also incorporate relevant information and findings from a financial feasibility analysis we are currently preparing for the City of Berkeley. That analysis—part of a study to revise the City’s in-lieu fees for inclusionary housing requirements—includes examination of the impacts of Berkeley’s “Helping Achieve Responsible Development with Healthcare and Apprenticeship Training Standards” (HARD HATS) ordinance. Our understanding is that South San Francisco’s new labor standards would likely be similar to the HARD HATS requirements. Scope of Work Task 1: Analysis of Labor Standards Impacts on Development Feasibility Using the same housing development “prototypes” analyzed for the South San Francisco commercial linkage fee nexus study, Strategic Economics will complete a pro forma financial feasibility analysis for the prototypes based on application of the proposed labor standards (or, if more details are not available, Strategic Economics will apply the Berkeley HARD HATS standards). The three existing prototypes consist of townhomes, a five-story mixed-use podium project, and a seven-story mixed-use podium project. Strategic Economics will develop assumptions for hard costs of construction under the labor standards by applying information gleaned from analysis and developer interviews completed for other recent Bay Area projects. Strategic Economics will also conduct interviews with locally 109 Scope and Budget for Analysis of Labor Standards Impacts on Development Feasibility May 13, 2024 2 knowledgeable developers and general contractors operating in South San Francisco, contingent on their responsiveness to interview requests. Strategic Economics will prepare a memo describing the results of the feasibility analysis and other policy issues identified through the analysis. The feasibility analysis will compare results for the prototypes with and without the labor standards. Examples of other potential policy issues include variations in construction cost impacts by project size and consideration of how the labor standards impact vertically integrated development businesses that do not use outside contractors. Deliverables: Preliminary Administrative Draft Memo for City staff review and comment; Administrative Draft Memo for final City staff comments; Final Memo Timeline: Delivery of admin draft memo within three months of project kickoff call with City staff Task 2: Public Meetings A Strategic Economics representative will prepare for and attend, either in-person or virtually, up to two public meetings/hearings to present the analysis results and respond to questions. Deliverable: PowerPoint slides, if needed Timeline: Varies depending on when meetings are scheduled by the City Proposed Budget The scope of work can be completed for a total cost of $22,460. The detailed budget, with staff billing rates and hours by task, is shown on the following page. 110 Scope and Budget for Analysis of Labor Standards Impacts on Development Feasibility 2 111 City Council October 9, 2024 1112 2 Background and Council Request What is Wage Theft? How does the State prosecute violations? What can a local ordinance do? Next steps 113 3 Council retreat requested Healthcare, Prevailing Wage and Wage Theft Ordinances for consideration Healthcare and Prevailing Wage feasibility study underway with Strategic Economics Wage Theft Ordinance for discussion tonight 114 4 Typically, minimum wage/overtime violations Most affected employees are food service workers, followed closely by construction workers Estimated $2B stolen annually across all sectors (based on 2017 analysis) 115 5 CA Labor Commissioner’s Office determines a wage theft violation If the employer that owes the wages fails to pay the workers, a judgment is issued to help the worker recover the wages These judgments are court orders to pay wages and other monies owed 116 6 Draft ordinance would focus on narrow band of potential actors: contractors or subcontractors working on new construction or large remodels (>15,000 SF) Why? Building permit and Certificate of Occupancy give the City an enforcement tool to deploy that we don’t have with general operating businesses 117 7 Withholding building final approvals may incentivize resolution Particularly effective if a contractor or subcontractor working in the City has a state issued judgement of wage theft Without a final building permit, contractors are not usually paid in full 118 8 1.As project condition, Applicant must submit a form declaring they comply with all state labor laws 2.Applicant must submit a Pay Transparency Certification that there are no unpaid wage theft judgements 3.Ordinance is complaint driven and submitted to Building Official prior to Building Final 4.City Attorney responsible for verifying complaints with State and overseeing any appeal process 5.Building Official withholds approvals until resolved 119 9 The City of San Jose has a wage theft ordinance for new construction that informed the City’s draft ordinance The City of Fresno has focused enforcement with both civil and criminal charges Recent state grant to the SMCo District Attorney will ramp up local enforcement and support referrals 120 Provide feedback on the draft ordinance and/or Consider introduction of the draft ordinance for adoption tonight 10121 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco amending Title 8 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to add Chapter 8.78 to regulate certain private development projects by withholding the certificate of occupancy or building permit final when an owner or contractor has unpaid final wage theft judgments WHEREAS, the labor advocate Nor Cal Carpenters Union has identified wage theft as an ongoing issue on construction projects and has requested local jurisdictions to take reasonable enforcement action to reduce this type of violation; and WHEREAS, the failure by an employer to pay owed and earned wages by contract can affect the health and welfare of employees and/or residents of South San Francisco; and WHEREAS, in compliance with California State law, the City has drafted a local ordinance for enforcement of final wage theft judgements made by the State of California Labor Commission; and WHEREAS, this ordinance would withhold Certificate of occupancy or Building permit final approvals from a contractor if City staff have sustained a complaint of an unpaid wage theft judgment; and WHEREAS, by withholding Certificate of occupancy or Building permit final, the City will incentivize resolution of an unresolved wage theft judgement since most private contracts require complete approvals prior to final payment; and WHEREAS, this ordinance will be enforceable for new construction meeting certain size and valuation thresholds. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Preamble The City Council finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into the Ordinance by this reference. Section 2. Adoption of Chapter 8.78 Wage Theft Ordinance 8.78.010 Title and purpose This chapter provides local enforcement and penalty for any contractor doing a project within the City and deemed to have an unresolved wage theft judgement on their record. The City has the right to withhold a Certificate of occupancy or Building permit final in this circumstance as a local measure to ensure fair and City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™122 File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. equitable wage payments to employees. 8.78.020 Definitions The following words and phrases, whenever used in this Part, shall be construed as defined in this section: A.“Certificate of occupancy” means the building official’s certification that the project complies with all applicable requirements for occupancy. The building official’s signature on the final inspection card may serve as the certificate of occupancy. B.“Building permit final” means all components related to the project are complete: There are no construction crew left on site working, there are no outstanding correction items from any department and all departments have signed off. C.“Contractor” means the prime contractor for the project. D.“Subcontractor” means any business or person that carries out work of the prime contractor or another contractor for the project. E.“Hearing officer” means the City Attorney or designee. F.“Labor Code Section 226(a)” is a provision of the California Labor Code that requires the employer to provide each employee, either bimonthly or at the time of payment of wages, an itemized wage statement that contains certain specified information concerning the employee’s wages and deductions. G.“Labor Code Section 2810.5” is a provision of the California Labor Code that requires the employer, at the time of hiring, to provide each employee a written notice containing certain specified information about the employer, the employee’s rate of pay, worker’s compensation insurance, and sick leave. H.“Mail” means to deposit in United States mail, postage prepaid, unless the parties have agreed in writing to receive notifications by email in lieu of United States mail. I.“New construction” means construction of new buildings or structures including additions to existing buildings and structures. J.“Owner” means the person or persons, firm, corporation, partnership or other legal entity exercising ownership of the project. K.“Remodeling” means internal or external reconstruction, renovation, or improvements to an existing building or structure that does not constitute complete replacement of the existing building or structure. L.“Project” means a construction project that requires a building permit from the City of South San Francisco. M.“Project construction employees” means employees of the contractor or subcontractor. N.“Representative” means a person authorized to legally bind the owner and/or contractor (for example, a corporate officer, general partner, or managing member of a limited liability company). O.“Unpaid wage theft judgment” means a judgment, decision or order, for which all appeals have been exhausted or the time to appeal has expired, that was issued by a court of law or an investigatory City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™123 File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. government agency authorized to enforce applicable federal, state and local wage and hour laws, including, but not limited to, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code, and the City of South San Francisco Minimum Wage Ordinance (Chapter 8.71), and which has not been fully paid or satisfied. As used in this subsection, “investigatory government agency” includes the United States Department of Labor, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the city of South San Francisco, or any other governmental entity or division tasked with the investigation and enforcement of wage and hour laws. 8.78.030 Exemptions A project that meets any of the following criteria is exempt from the requirements of this chapter. A.The project consists of less than fifteen thousand square feet of new construction or remodeling. 8.78.040 Acknowledgement of responsibility As a condition of approval for any building permit required for a project, an applicant shall sign an acknowledgement that: A.The owner, contractor, and all subcontractors on the project will comply with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the California Labor Code, including Labor Code Sections 2810.5 and 226a. B.The owner and contractor are responsible for ensuring that the contractor and all subcontractors on the project pay any wage theft judgments that have been entered against them either before or during the construction of the project. C.A violation under Section 8.78.070 will result in withholding of the certificate of occupancy/building permit final, whichever is applicable, at the conclusion of the project. 8.78.050 Posting Each day that work is performed on the project, the contractor shall post, in a conspicuous place at each job site where work takes place, the notice published each year by the city informing employees of their rights under this chapter. The notice shall be written in the top three languages spoken in the city based on the latest available census information for the City. 8.78.060 Pay transparency certification Prior to issuance of approval of certificate of occupancy or building permit final for a project, for each contractor or subcontractor whose portion of the work exceeds one hundred thousand dollars or one percent of the value of the construction cost of the project, whichever is greater, owner shall provide to the city a pay transparency certification (“certification”), signed by a representative of the owner, the contractor and any subcontractor under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California. The certification required under City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™124 File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. this section shall be in a form approved by the city and contain the following. A.A statement that the owner, contractor, and any subcontractors have no unpaid wage theft judgments; and B.A statement that: (1)Project construction employees of the contractor and any subcontractors received written notice of the employers’ pay practices as required by California Labor Code Section 2810.5 and wage statements under Labor Code Section 226(a); or (2)Project construction employees of the contractor and/or any subcontractors are covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement that expressly provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of the employee, and the agreement provides premium wage rates for all overtime hours worked and a regular hourly rate of pay for those employees of not less than thirty percent more than the state minimum wage. (See Labor Code Section 2810.5(c)). 8.78.070 Violations A.The building official shall not issue a certificate of occupancy or building permit final under either of the following circumstances: (1)The owner has failed to submit the pay transparency certification required by Section 8.78.060. (2)The City Attorney has sustained a complaint of an unpaid wage theft judgment pursuant to Section 8.78.080, and the owner or contractor has neither cured the unpaid wage theft judgment nor reversed the City Attorney’s determination by appeal pursuant to Section 8.78.090. 8.78.80 Unpaid wage theft judgement - Complaint A.Any person who is aware of an unpaid wage theft judgment against the contractor or a subcontractor on a project whose portion of the work exceeds one hundred thousand dollars or one percent of the value of the construction cost of the project, whichever is greater, may submit a complaint to the building official. The complaint must include: (1) a copy of a labor commissioner’s order, decision or award; (2) a copy of the judgment entered by a court of law that the specified contractor or subcontractor is the subject of an unpaid wage theft judgment; and (3) a declaration signed under penalty of perjury from the person that is owed the unpaid wages under the final wage theft judgment against the specified contractor or subcontractor that the judgment has not been satisfied. B.The complaint must be received by the building official before the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy or building permit final. After receiving a complaint, the building official shall not issue the certificate of occupancy or building permit final if the City Attorney finds that the complaint is sustained. C.The City Attorney shall, within 10 working days, mail written notice of the complaint to the owner and contractor at the address(es) on file with the city for the project. If the review of the complaint will delay issuance of the certificate of occupancy or building permit final, the City Attorney shall notify the owner and contractor as soon as practicable. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™125 File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. D.The owner or contractor may provide a written response to the complaint within 30 working days of the mailing of the notice of alleged violation. Failure to respond may be deemed an admission to the truth of the facts alleged in the complaint. E.After consideration of the complaint and the owner or contractor’s response, if any, the City Attorney shall make a finding that the complaint is either sustained or not sustained. The City Attorney’s decision shall be mailed to owner, contractor, complaining party, and the person that is owed the unpaid wages under the final wage theft judgment. 8.78.090 Unpaid wage theft judgement - Appeal A.If an owner or contractor is aggrieved by a decision of the City Attorney pursuant to Section 8.78.080, the aggrieved owner or contractor may appeal the decision by submitting a written appeal with the hearing officer within 10 working days of the mailing of the City Attorney’s decision. The appeal shall contain the facts and basis for the appeal. The appeal shall be accompanied by payment of the appeal fee adopted by the city council. B.The hearing shall be heard by the hearing officer within 60 working days of receipt of the appeal, or at a date and time agreed to by the parties. The complaining party shall be the respondent at the appeal hearing. C.All parties involved shall have the right to offer testimonial, documentary, and tangible evidence bearing on the issues, to be represented by counsel, and to confront and cross-examine witnesses. Testimony may be taken on oath or affirmation. The hearing shall not be conducted according to formal rules of evidence. Any relevant evidence may be admitted if it is the sort of evidence upon which reasonable persons are accustomed to relying in the conduct of serious affairs. D.The hearing shall be de novo. The complaining party must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the contractor or a subcontractor on the project is the subject of an unpaid wage theft judgment. E.The hearing officer shall issue a written decision within 10 working days of the hearing. The decision shall be final and shall be subject to judicial review according to the provisions and time limits set forth in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 8.78.100 Cure of violation The owner, contractor, or subcontractor may cure a violation of this chapter at any time, including a violation related to an unpaid wage theft judgment, by providing evidence that the judgment has been paid, or that it has been secured by a labor payment bond, lien release bond, or similar security instrument in a form and amount sufficient to ensure that any wage claims and penalties can be fully paid. 8.78.110 No private right of action Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to authorize a right of action against the city. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™126 File #:24-982 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:12a. City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/10/2024Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™127 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-912 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:13. Proclamation celebrating Filipino American Heritage Month presented on October 5, 2024.(James Coleman, Mayor) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™128 RECOGNIZING OCTOBER AS FILIPINO AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH OCTOBER 5, 2024 WHERAS, four million Filipino Americans reside in the United States, comprising approximately 1.2% of the country’s population, and nearly one in seven immigrants from Asia is from the Philippines; and WHEREAS, 43.4% of South San Francisco residents identify as Asian, and approximately 14% of households speak Filipino at home; and WHEREAS, Filipino American presence dates back to the earliest documented settlement on October 18, 1587 when mariners called “Luzones indios” under Spanish command landed in Morrow Bay, California; and WHEREAS, the Philippines is the fourth most common country of origin for immigrants to the United States, after Mexico, India and China; and WHEREAS, in 2009, after years of advocacy by individuals and organizations, the United States Congress recognized the contributions and sacrifices made by the Filipino Community and recognized October as Filipino American History Month; and WHEREAS, Filipino Americans have a long and proud history of service in the United States military, with many serving in the armed forces of the United States during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War; and WHEREAS, the Filipino Veterans of World War II Congressional Medal Act was unanimously passed by Congress and was signed into law in December 2016; and WHEREAS, in the month of October, we honor the history, pursuits, accomplishments and legacy of Filipinos in the United States who have enriched our communities through their work and contributions in the armed forces, local, state, and national government, and as scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, accountants, teachers, lawyers, nurses, doctors and more, as well as their involvement in civic and community activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to instill in our youth the importance of education, history and ethnicity in creating eminent role models, in establishing a proud cultural identity, and producing exceptional citizens of this nation; and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco is honored to celebrate Filipino American History Month along with the Filipino American National Historical Society who proudly uphold this year’s theme of Struggle, Resistance, Solidarity, and Resilience. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that on October 5, 2024, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby proclaim October 2024 as Filipino American History Month and encourages all residents of our community to join us in celebrating this special month. James Coleman, Mayor Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor Mark Addiego, Councilmember Mark Nagales, Councilmember Buenaflor Nicolas, Councilmember Dated: October 5, 2024 129 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:24-1027 Agenda Date:10/9/2024 Version:1 Item #:14. Council discussion on designation of voting delegates and alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo. (Eddie Flores, Vice Mayor) City of South San Francisco Printed on 10/4/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™130 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 16-18, 2024 Long Beach Convention Center Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. Taking place on Oct. 18, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official. Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 25. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form. Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website. Council Action Advised by September 25, 2024 131 For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly. Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference. Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 17, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 18, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 25. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected]. Attachments: • General Assembly Voting Guidelines • Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly 132 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate. 6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly. 133 Sixty days before the Annual Conference and Expo, Cal Cities members may submit policy proposals on issues of importance to cities. The resolution must have the concurrence of at least five additional member cities or individual members. How it works: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly General Assembly General Resolutions Policy Committees Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control. The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work. The petitioned resolution is an alternate method to introduce policy proposals during the annual conference. The petition must be signed by voting delegates from 10% of member cities, and submitted to the Cal Cities President at least 24 hours before the beginning of the General Assembly. Petitioned Resolutions The Cal Cities President assigns general resolutions to policy committees where members review, debate, and recommend positions for each policy proposal. Recommendations are forwarded to the Resolutions Committee. Who’s who The Resolutions Committee includes representatives from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, municipal department, and policy committee, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. Voting delegates are appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. The General Assembly is a meeting of the collective body of all voting delegates —one from every member city. Seven policy committees meet throughout the year to review and recommend positions to take on bills and regulatory proposals. Policy committees include members from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, and municipal department, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. During the General Assembly, voting delegates debate and consider general and petitioned resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws amendments are also considered at this meeting. Cal Cities policy development is a member- informed process, grounded in the voices and experiences of city officials throughout the state. For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo Resolutions Committee The Resolutions Committee considers all resolutions. General Resolutions approved1 by either a policy committee or the Resolutions Committee are next considered by the General Assembly. General resolutions not approved, or referred for further study by both a policy committee and the Resolutions Committee do not go to the General Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions are considered by the General Assembly, unless disqualified.2 During the Annual Conference and Expo 1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). 134 135 Agenda Item PUBLIC COMMENTS 1 Public Comment • Guest User at October 09, 2024 at 3:38pm PDT Hello. This is Bill Lock otherwise known as Asphalt Bill. I now have to amend the nickname to Dumb Asphalt Bill. As you may recall, I came to this Council about the damage done to my rear tire by the city's contractor. Numerous large chunks of asphalt were stuck to my tire and made it inoperative. I had the car towed to the dealer on a flat bed truck. Thanks to my membership to AAA road services, there was no charge. The chevrolet dealership took pity upon me and removed 90 to 95% of the asphalt from the tire. The dealership did it for free - very kind people who laughed at the absurdity. They remarked how careless of the contractor. The dealership advised that I needed to rotate the tires. Being a front wheel drive car, the weight of the car would be on the front tires. This would help remove the remaining smaller fragments and ensure that no other damage could occur. The cost was $69.99. Due to their kindness and professionalism, I accepted The SSF DPW staff advised that I should file a claim. I followed this instruction and filed a claim for $69.99. How dumb and naive I was. I assumed City of South San Francisco would take care of me. Boy was I wrong. I received a denial notice by mail. It also stated that I needed to hire an attorney to pursue this claim further. Who would hire an attorney for a claim of $69.99. I might have been dumb enough to do so. But I have enough stress in my life. I worry about the controversy surrounding the proposed new Linden Park. I worry about the growing divide between the City Council and the populus. I stress at the lack of Park and Rec infrastructure in Lindenville. I worry about the people living in their cars and RV parked across South San Francisco. I worry about the lack of real collarboration between SSF, SSFUSD, SFPUC and PGE. I worry that Lowe's would be another long term iteration of Levitz. By the way, besides my family, friends and Chevrolet dealership, only one person has inquired about how my car was doing. No , it was not a SSF DW staff. It was Vice Mayor Eddie Flores. Guess I am fortunate that one person had empathy and took the time and effort to communicate with me. DUMB ASPHALT BILL Agenda Item PUBLIC COMMENTS 1 Public Comment • Guest User at October 09, 2024 at 3:38pm PDT Hello. This is Bill Lock otherwise known as Asphalt Bill. I now have to amend the nickname to Dumb Asphalt Bill. As you may recall, I came to this Council about the damage done to my rear tire by the city's contractor. Numerous large chunks of asphalt were stuck to my tire and made it inoperative. I had the car towed to the dealer on a flat bed truck. Thanks to my membership to AAA road services, there was no charge. The chevrolet dealership took pity upon me and removed 90 to 95% of the asphalt from the tire. The dealership did it for free - very kind people who laughed at the absurdity. They remarked how careless of the contractor. The dealership advised that I needed to rotate the tires. Being a front wheel drive car, the weight of the car would be on the front tires. This would help remove the remaining smaller fragments and ensure that no other damage could occur. The cost was $69.99. Due to their kindness and professionalism, I accepted The SSF DPW staff advised that I should file a claim. I followed this instruction and filed a claim for $69.99. How dumb and naive I was. I assumed City of South San Francisco would take care of me. Boy was I wrong. I received a denial notice by mail. It also stated that I needed to hire an attorney to pursue this claim further. Who would hire an attorney for a claim of $69.99. I might have been dumb enough to do so. But I have enough stress in my life. I worry about the controversy surrounding the proposed new Linden Park. I worry about the growing divide between the City Council and the populus. I stress at the lack of Park and Rec infrastructure in Lindenville. I worry about the people living in their cars and RV parked across South San Francisco. I worry about the lack of real collarboration between SSF, SSFUSD, SFPUC and PGE. I worry that Lowe's would be another long term iteration of Levitz. By the way, besides my family, friends and Chevrolet dealership, only one person has inquired about how my car was doing. No , it was not a SSF DW staff. It was Vice Mayor Eddie Flores. Guess I am fortunate that one person had empathy and took the time and effort to communicate with me. DUMB ASPHALT BILL