Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 3832-1963Annexation of lands of Mazzanti et al. RESOLUTION NO.383~ RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "LANDS OF MAZZANTI ET AL." AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF PROTESTS THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of South San Francisco: 1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners of not less than one-fourth of the land in the here- inafter described territory, by area and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Mateo, was filed with the Council of the City of South San Francisco on November 21, 1963, requesting annexation of the hereinafter described territory to said City. 2. That the territory which the petitioners request be annexed to the City of South San Francisco and which said City and its Council propose to annex, is situated in the County of San Mateo, State of California, hereby designated as "lands of Mazzanti et al." and described as follows: Annexation - Lands of Mazzanti et al. BEGINNING at a point in the corporate limits of the City of South San Francisco, as said limits were established by that certain resolution and order dated August 17, 1908, declaring said City incorporated, said point also being the intersection of the Southwesterly prolongation of the Southerly line of Oak Avenue with the Westerly line of Mission Road, referred to in said incorporation as the ~'Westerly line of the main County Road leading from San Francisco to San Jose"; thence from said point of beginning Northwesterly along said corporate limits and said Westerly line 1150 feet, more or less, to the intersection there- of with the Northwesterly line of that certain tract of land described in Deed from Spring Valley Water Company, to the City and County of San Francisco, (Parcel 21) recorded March 3rd, 1930, in Volume 491 of Official Records of San Marco County at page 1 and the true point of beginning of the lands to be des- cribed herein~ thence from said true point of beginning North- westerly along said 'Westerly line of County Road and said corporate limits and continuing along the corporate limits of the City of South San Francisco, as established by that certain Ordinance No. 303 of the City of South San Francisco annexing Mission Gardens to said City, adopted on September 12, 1950 as follows: North 44° 20' West 28 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly line of a private road leading from the ~Flood and Mackay Tract'~ ko the said County Road, North 44° 20 West 250 feet, North 48 50' West 200 feet, North 54° 00' West 527 feet, North 46° 19~ West 300 feet, North 45° 31' West 200 feet, North 43° 41' West 150 feet, North 42° 45' West 45 feet to the Southeasterly line of a private road leading from the lands of H. Miller to the said County Road and continuing along said corporate limit lime North 42 45' West to the Northwesterly line of sa~d private road; thence con- tinuing along said Westerly line of County Road and said existing corporate limit line North 42° 45' West 1i3.3 feet; thence leav- ing said Westerly line of the corporate limits being also the Westerly line of the County Road, South 40° 31' West 92.5 feet to the Easterly line of the right of way of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company; thence along said Easterly line of the right of way, as follows: South 50° 33' East 518 feet, South 48° 15' East 166 feet, South 45° 30' East 147.5 feet, South 44° 13' East 150 feet, South 42° 16' East 150 feet, South 40° 12' East 180 feet, South 46° 32' East 210.O feet, South 76° 20' East 24 feet, South 47° 15' East 30 feet~ South 15° 28' East 23 feet, South 46° 50 East 79 feet, South 54 34 West 67.5 feet and South 30° 08' East 192 feet to the said Northwesterly line of lands of City and County of San Francisco (Parcel 21); thence Easterly, leav- ing said Easterly line of the right of way, of the Southern Paci- fic Railroad Company and along said Northwesterly line of Parcel 21, North 40° 26' East 240 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. 3. That the County Boundary Commission of San Mateo County, California, did in session duly assembled on No- vember 20, 1963, consider the proposed annexation boundaries of said lands of Mazzanti et al., as above described, and as submitted to said Commission by the proponents of said annexation, and did in Resolution No.828 of said Boundary Commission approve same. 4. That February ~3, 1964, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall in the City of South San Francisco, County of San Mateo, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where any person owning real property within the uninhabited territory above described and proposed to be annexed to the City of South San Francisco and having any objections to the proposed an- nexation may appear before the Council of the City of South San Francisco and show cause why such uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to the City of South San Francisco. The protest must be in writing, may be filed at any time be- fore the hour set for hearing objections to the proposed annex- ation, and shall state the name or names of the owner or owners of property affected and the description and area of such property, in general terms. 5. The City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this re- solution to be published at least twice, but not oftener than once a week, in the "Enterprise-Journal", a newspaper of general circulation published in said City of South San Fran- cisco, the city to which it is proposed to annex the afore- said territory, and also in the "Advance-Star", a newspaper of general circulation published outside the City of South San Be Francisco, but in the County of San Mateo, California, the county in which is located the territory proposed to be annexed to the City of South San Francisco, said publication to be complete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set for hearing. 6. The said City Clerk is further authorized and di- rected to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person to whom land within the terri- tory proposed to be annexed was assessed in the last equal- ized County assessment roll available on the date the above said proceedings were initiated, at the addresses shown on said assessment roll or known to said Clerk, and to any per- son who has filed his name and address and the designation of the lands in which he has an interest, either legal or equitable, with said Clerk, such notice to be given not less than twenty (20) days before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation. 7. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to trans- mit or cause to be transmitted a copy of the resolution to the governing board of each school district which in part, or in whole, is included in the territory sought to be in- cluded in the city, and which has made written request there- for. 8. The said City Clerk is further authorized and di- rected to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person to whom land within the terri- tory proposed to be annexed is assessed in the last equal- ized assessment roll available on the date the proceedings were initiated, at the address shown on the assessment roll or as known to said Clerk, and to any person who has filed e his name and address and the designation of the lands in which he has any interest, either legal or equitable, with said Clerk. 9. In the event any land within the territory pro- posed to be annexed is owned by a county, the City Clerk is directed to cause written notice of such proposed annex- ation to be mailed to the Board of Supervisors of such coun- ty, such notice to be given not less than twenty (20) days before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation. 10. In the event there is, upon the land proposed to be annexed to said City, a structural improvement owned, being acquired or leased by a county fire protection district, the City Clerk is directed to cause written no- tice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to the govern- ing body of such district, such notice to be sent not less than twenty (20) days before the first hearing upon such proposed annexation. 11. The City Clerk is directed to cause written no- tice to be given to such other persons as may be legally en- titled thereto, in the manner required by law. the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held this 16th day of by the following vote: AYES, COUNCILMEN I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of regular December , 19 63 , Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, G. J. Rozzi, and Frank Bertuce]li NOES, " NoBe ABSENT, " None ATTEST: City Clerk