Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2008-01-12 MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL MEETING CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 400 GRAND AVENUE JANUARY 12, 2008 City Council Meeting Called to Order: 9:03 a.ln. (Cassette Tape No.1) Redevelopnlent Agency Meeting Called to Order: 9:03 a.ln. City Council and RedeveloplTIent Agency Roll Call: Present: Councilmen/BoaTdlnem bers Addiego, Garbarino and Mullin, Mayor Pro T'em/Vice Chairwon1al1 Matsun1oto al1d Mayor/ChainTIall Gonzalez. * Absent: None. * For reporting purposes, pal-ticipal1ts are referred to by their titles affiliated witl1 the City Council except under the specific Redevelopment ItelTI that was heal-d as ItelTI NUlnber 2. Public COlnnlents: None. Items for Discussion: 1. Council Priorities. City Manager Nagel introduced the discussion by asking the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tenl and Councihnen to describe their respective goals and/or focus of attention for 2008. Mayor Gonzalez stated his goal of advancing green living policies in the City. He referred to a hydrogen fueled bus presentation he attended in East Palo Alto as an example of an envirornnent- friendly fuel option. His comments initiated the following discussion pertaining to present green living policies and future goals: Councilman Mullin inquired as to staff s progress in evaluating the City's carbon footprint. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn advised that South San Francisco joined a consortium of Santa Clara and San Mateo County cities working on a regional approach to developing a baseline carbon input figure. The City is pursuing a subsidy offered by CCAG and has independently cOlnmitted $12,000 towards creation of this baseline analysis. Staff is also actively looking at alternate sources for capturing energy. He further advised that staff is preparing a report that will summarize the City's green living efforts and policies in a cOlnbined format. He suggested a study session may be appropriate for presentation of the report, after which Council could provide further input on policy goals and objectives. Mayor Gonzalez suggested that conlmunity town hall-style lneetings on the subject might also be appropriate. Councilman Garbarino commented on the financial challenges presented by green living programs. He noted the programs are expensive to fund and stressed the importance of being first in-line when funding from state and federal agencies becomes available. He emphasized the return on green living programs is to the environment and usually cannot be measured immediately or financially. Councilman Addiego inquired as to City programs to encourage resident's green living efforts. City Attorney Mattas advised that as part of an overall green living program, the City could provide development benefits when green living improvelnents are proposed and/or for mitigation of heavy water use. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn confirmed that the City currently waives building permit fees when solar improvements are proposed. Staff also routinely requests that consultants provide altenlatives for incentive bonuses for green building offsets. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto cOlnmented that the City is one of the few in the County to have its water treatment plant go cogen. She advised the Council that Assistant City Manager Van Duyn is Council's point person on green. She further opined that CCAG is innovative with respect to green living programs. As the Council's CCAG representative, she reviews the packet she received from the agency and disperses it to appropriate City staff for consideration. For example, she has provided CCAG hydrogen information to director of Public Works White, who has applied for a hydrogen car fronl the Ford Company. She advised that she could report on CCAG green living information at Council meetings. She further noted that the return on solar is about 30 years, thus long-term South San Francisco Companies should be encouraged to pursue solar options. Council continued discussion of members' goals for 2008 under Item 15, "other", as set forth below. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 2 2. Redevelopment Discussion. Agency Director Nagel introduced the topic as an effort to develop a philosophical approach to Redevelopment. He noted the topic would likely COlne up as part of the upconling study session on updates to the zoning code. He further noted that Counsel Susan Bloch of Meyers Nave was present and available to discuss the topic. Vice ChairwOlnan Matsumoto opined that South San Francisco's Redevelopment Program is consistent with Redevelopment Guidelines. However, she stressed the difficulty of making policy decisions based upon unclear rules. She further explained that prior to taking action on Redevelopment itelns at lneetings, she often poses questions in an effort to discern clarity with respect to the guidelines. She stated that lnuch of her concern stems frOln when she was nmned as a Defendant in an eminent domain case in her official capacity. Counsel Mattas advised that the eminent domain case involved a Disposition and Development Agreement, pursuant to which the Agency agreed to help a developer assemble parcels of property in private ownership as pmi of a master development plan. In the course of this project, the Agency used eminent domain to purchase parcels at fair market value. Some property owners elected to counter-sue to challenge the eminent domain action. This lawsuit was a consequence of the eminent domain action and even though the case was resolved, it was uncomfortable for the defendants. Counsel Mattas further explained that the Agency has an additional eminent domain power that allows assemblage of private property for re-use by private developers as part of a master plan that will benefit an overall Redevelopment Area. This power has been the subject of ballot measures in California. Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto emphasized the difficulty in situations where properties are assembled pursuant to eminent domain powers and then turned over to private developers for the greater good of the City. Counsel Bloch advised that the power of Redevelopment Agencies to use eminent domain to take private property has been on the books in California for many years and was confirmed by the United States Suprelne Court in the Keylo case. She emphasized that the powers are limited and specific procedures must be followed before such action is taken. Counsel Mattas advised that the laws pertaining to the eminent domain power have tightened and the Jarvis Initiative would eliminate the power to condemn private property for purposes of reconveYlng. Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto raised the issue of the PUC land in the Chestnut Avenue EI Camino Real Area. Assistant Agency Director Van Duyn advised that the Agency has only exercised its eminent domain power to take private land and turn it over for private development one time. He further advised that he doesn't foresee the Agency using the power in the near future, although it could. With respect to the PUC/Chestnut A venue/EI Camino Real land area, he opined that the Agency SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 3 had positioned itself to create a specific plan for the area without enlinent donlain. He further advised that the area is covered under the General Plan and could include low-cost housing and other opportunities that would pennit use ofRedevelopnlent funds. Boardnlenlber Addiego stated that if there was a project in the downtown area that could potentially rehabilitate a whole City block with econonlic vibrancy or housing but for the exception of a hold-out, he would be in favor of enlinent dOlTIain. Boardnlenlber Garbarino concurred as long as a specific plan was in place. Counsel Bloch presented the Boardlnelnbers with a docunlent that provided an overview of Redevelopnlent powers. Counsel Mattas advised Boardnlenlbers to read tlu'ough the doculnent at their leisure and suggested that a study session on the topic nlight be in order. He fluiher advised that the Redeveloplnent Agency had the authority to set a vision for designated areas and to use Redevelopnlent powers to bring business into the City and ilnprove public infrastructure. Agency Director Nagel confirnled that Boardlnelnbers believed a study session on Redeveloplnent powers and guidelines nlight be appropriate. Boardlnelnber Mullin requested clarification of the two competing ballot lneasures on elninent dOlnain. Counsel Bloch explained the Jarvis hlitiative would sweep in restrictions on land use. The other nleasure would serve as a poison pill to the Jarvis initiative, restrict the ability to use e1ninent donlain for single fmnily hOlnes and lilnit rent control. Counsel Mattas advised that both lneasures were qualified on the ballot for June '08. Vice Chairwolnan Matsulnoto requested Counsel to advise on how the Agency could educate the public pertaining to the measures. Counsel Mattas advised that Boardlnembers were prohibited froln using public funds to advocate against a specific position, but could enteliain presentations explaining the lneasures in a neutral fashion. He further stated that Boardnlenlbers could take public positions on the lneasures. 3. Regulatory Authority over New Uses under Existing Land Use Pennits. City Manager Nagel explained that City AttoDley Mattas provided a memo to Council on this topic concerning Council's understanding of its powers and lilnitations with respect to regulating land use. City Attorney Mattas advised that the nlelno he submitted explained a recent Califonlia Suprenle Court case, Henlandez v. City of Hanford ("Hanford"), that recognized Council's authority to zone the physical development and uses within a district for a pmiicular result. He noted Hanford's potential relevance to up cOIning zoning mnendlnent discussions. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12, 2008 AGENDA PAGE 4 Mayor Pro Tenl Matslunoto opined that the Planning COlnnlission would benefit fronl the infoDl1ation included in the nlelno. For the benefit of Councilnlelnbers, she further requested City Attorney Mattas to recount the W al- Mmi land use issue Council dealt with several years ago. City Attonley Mattas stated that the City Attonley's Office would provide the nlenlO and relevant updates to the Planning COlnlnission. He further explained that Wal-Mart lost a lawsuit it filed against the City challenging an urgency ordinance establishing a lnoratorimn on approvals in the area for a ShOli period of tinle during which the City detennined to pennanently re-zone the property. Councihnan Garbarino questioned whether Hanford would govenl the Airpoli Costco Gas Station situation. City Attorney Mattas advised that if Hanford had existed when the Council set the land use designations for the Airport Costco Gas Station, it nlight have been in a stronger legal position to say no. Councilnlan Addiego requested consideration of zoning of the relnaining Levitz site. Mayor Gonzalez questioned the City's authority to disallow 2 or 3 businesses of sanle nanle frOln opening in the City. City Attorney Mattas reconlmended that Council consider a study session if it wished to pursue specific discussions on the inlplications of its zoning authority under state law. This would penllit staff to obtain a clear understanding of Council's policy direction. Staff could then propose policies to Counsel tlu'ough the nOlTIlal chmmels involving all the stake holders. He further advised that as part of this process, Councillnay hear argunlents fronl building owners pertaining to the need to occupy their buildings. Councihnan Mullin questioned whether the outcome of the upcOlning zoning code review would necessitate a General Plan update. Assistant City Manager Van DuY11 advised that the state recolnnlends the General Plan be updated every 10 Years and the General Plan is currently 9 years old. The City will be updating its Housing Elenlent, which it is required to do every 5 years and then will launch the General Plan update. He opined that he didn't foresee that changes to the General Plan would be inconsistent with zoning codes unless housing densities were changed substantially. He further advised that the current zoning ordinance update is aimed at bringing the code current with present developnlent standards. He opined that there is not presently a disconnect between land uses established in the General Plan and the zoning codes. City Attonley Mattas advised that the zoning code is operable but fairly dated. He opined that the zoning code update should yield consistency with the 1999 General Plan and be flexible enough to encompass changes resulting from a General Plan update in the near future. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGES Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined that housing densities will need to be increased in certain areas and height restrictions will need to be considered to achieve particular densities. She questioned whether this could be accomplished through amendments to the General Plan. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn opined that the current General Plan was not an impediment to Council. He noted that if Council liked a project that exceeded current densities in a specific zone, it could amend the General Plan and allow the project. He further explained that this option would be lilnited by the rule that a General Plan can only be amended 4 tinles a year in a general law city. 4. Cmnpaign Sign Restrictions. City Manager Nagel introduced the topic and noted the City Attorney's Office provided a lnemo concerning current regulations pertaining to campaign signs. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned whether cmnpaign signs and/or other County and State signs on the EI Camino Real could be prohibited. Councilman Addiego questioned whether housing development signs directing traffic through town to a specific location could be prohibited. City Attorney Mattas advised that with respect to the posting of signs the Council could and has set times by which the signs must be removed under penalty of fine. Housing development related signs are illegal offsite commercial signs that may be taken down and citations may be issued. Mayor Gonzalez opined that candidates need to advise their committee members to follow regulations when putting signs out. Councilman Addiego noted that in the past, signs posted on green space between the property and the streets were removed by the City, but this didn't seem to be done in recent elections. He further noted the importance of signs for introducing new candidates to the community. Councilman Mullin questioned whether Council could require signs to be made out of a specific material such as recycled paper. City Attorney Mattas advised that he wasn't sure if a sign materials regulation had ever been tested. He opined, however, that Courts might be adverse to such a regulation that might impact a Candidate's ability to communicate his or her basic message. 5. Items from Council at City Council Meetings. Councilman Addiego opined that the public would benefit from detailed descriptions of fewer items, as opposed to brief discussions of many items, under the Items from Council agenda topic at regular meetings of the City Council. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 12,2008 PAGE 6 Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto commented that it lnight be more useful if Council would announce upcoming events as opposed to listing events attended. She further noted that Councilmenlbers' repolis out of committee assignments are significant. Councihnan Garbarino noted that the public appreciates hearing about events Councihnenlbers attended. He enlphasized that detail pertaining to what conles out of comnlittee and regional meetings is ilnportant. Mayor Gonzalez suggested that Councilmelnbers be mindful of agenda length when detennining items for reporting. Councihnan Mullin offered reporting on items with policy implications as a guideline. He further suggested starting the regular RDA meeting at 6:30 p.m. and regular Council nleetings at 7 :00 p.m. City Attonley Mattas advised that the regular meeting time of the City Council must be adjusted by ordinance. He further explained a procedural mechanism requiring public hearing agenda items to be heard at a specific time during regular meetings in order to provide the comlnunity with temporal certainty. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto expressed concern that public hearings have a tendency to be long which could mean that other agenda items would get pushed late into the evening. City Attorney Mattas. explained that if a long public hearing was anticipated, other significant items on the agenda could be moved ahead of the public hearings. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto and Councilman Garbarino requested that staff balance agenda items between the two regular monthly meetings of the City Council in a nlore even fashion. After discussion over the pros and cons of various suggestions, Council directed the City Attorney to prepare and propose an ordinance changing the regular meeting times of the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council to 6:30 and 7:00 p.m. respectively. Recess: 10:46 a.m. Meeting resumed: 10:52 a.m. 6. Public Comments at City Council Meetings. City Manager Nagel advised that staff had received requests from the public to make power point presentations under the public comments agenda item. He advised that staff would permit power point presentations limited to 3 minutes per speaker and only after the presentation had been reviewed by staff. Councilmembers agreed that power point presentations should be reviewed prior to airing. They further agreed that the meeting Chair should be definitive and forceful in setting parameters on speaker time limits under the public comment agenda iteln. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 7 City Attorney Mattas advised that the Chair must apply the time-lilnit policy consistently and unifonnly with respect to all speakers. 7. Presentations at City Council Meetings. Councihnan Addiego expressed concern over the Fire Department's holiday safety and toy drive presentation. He stated that the holiday safety video nlight have been more appropriate as a public safety lnessage than as a presentation at the City Councillneeting. He further expressed disappointlnent with the portion of the presentation that was given by North Peninsula Neighborhood Services. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined that North Peninsula Neighborhood Services' portion of the presentation was inappropriate. Councilman Garbarino echoed these concerns. Councilman Mullin stated that North Peninsula Neighborhood Services recognized the presentation was a misstep and was handling the matter internally. Mayor Pro Tem Matsumoto suggested time limits on presentations should be considered. Councilmelnbers then directed staff to prepare and propose a policy establishing that the time allotted for the presentation item on regular City Council Meeting Agendas would be no more than 15 minutes. Council further directed staff to adjust the number of presentations per meeting based upon this overall time limit. 8. Requests for Information - Council/Candidates. City Manager Nagel requested direction from Council on incumbent candidates' requests to staff for information during election season. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined that for strategic reasons it would be unfair to share a candidate's request for information with other candidates. Councilman Addiego noted a distinction between incumbent candidates requesting information for their campaign(s) as opposed to information for Council business purposes. Councilman Mullin questioned whether other cities have policies pertaining to non-incumbent candidates' access to information versus incumbent candidates' access to information. City Attorney Mattas advised that he was not aware of any such policies in other cities and noted the issue is probably handled informally. He further opined that the subject of candidate requests is almost always going to be public information because attorney client and personnel information is not disclosable. Thus, Council could establish a policy directing distribution to all candidates of information responsive to an incumbent candidate's request. He acknowledged that there was a strategic campaign argument against such a policy. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 12,2008 PAGE 8 Councilman Addiego asked for clarification on the following point: If an incumbent candidate received a questionnaire from an entity that was considering endorsing the candidate, would the incunlbent candidate have the right to ask staff to fill out the questionnaire? City AttoDley Mattas advised staff should not cOlnplete such a questionnaire. He further noted that just like any other candidate, the incumbent candidate could request existing infornlation that would assist his or her ability to complete the form. However, any candidates' request for staff to further process or distill existing infonnation to conlplete a cmnpaign related fonn would be inappropriate. Mayor Pro Tern Matsunloto noted that she was not in favor ofpennitting candidates, including incumbent candidates, to request non-existing staff- processed or distilled information after candidacies have been declared. She further opined that it would be unfair to distribute existing information responsive to any candidates' public records request to all other candidates. City Attorney Mattas clarified that pursuant to amendments to the Public Records Act that became effective 2 years ago, government agencies must tell people how to find requested information when aware it exists in an alternative form. For example, if a person came in and requested all reports relating to the City' Attorney's Office on blue paper, and the City employee knew the City possessed reports pertaining to the City Attorney's Office that happened to be on yellow paper, the employee was obligated to guide the person towards this information. City Attonley Mattas confirmed agreement amongst Councilmembers that compliance with this Public Records Act requirement would not constitute distilling information. City Clerk Martinelli- Larson requested to speak through the chair and questioned how the contemplated policy would interplay with public records requests to the City Clerk's Office from candidates. City Attorney Mattas advised that any policy Council directed vis-a.-vis City staff would not apply to the City Clerk's Office. City Manager Nagel noted that with respect to staffs dealings with incumbent candidates, Public Records Act request decisions were more clear-cut than decisions with respect to day-to-day requests received from incumbent Councilmembers during election time. Councilman Addiego opined that it is unfair for an incumbent candidate to request staff s assistance to distill information for use in the respective candidate's campaign. He noted that he perceived some unfairness with respect to this issue during the recent campaign season. Councilman Garbarino suggested a policy that once an incumbent has declared his or her candidacy, information responsive to the incumbent candidate's requests to staff must be distributed to all candidates. Councilman Addiego concurred with this suggested policy at a mInImum. City Attorney Mattas advised that disclosure of more information was always permissible. He suggested using the Public Records Act as the time frame within which staff must provide SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 9 infolmation in response to campaign related requests fronl incunlbent candidates. He further stated the exception to any policy established by Council would be for attolTIey/client or personnel related infonnation. Councilman Addiego raised the issue of a single councilperson requesting information that could require a substmltial mnount of attorney or staff time without limitation. After discussion, Council directed staff to advise Councilmembers if it believed compliance with a paliicular request might take a significant amount of tilne so that Council could decide collectively whether the request lnerited the use of staff time. After further discussion on the issue of incumbent candidate requests, City Attorney Mattas summarized the proposed policies as follows: From the date of the close of the filing period for candidates through Election Day, responses to requests to staff from incumbent candidates will be distributed to all candidates. Further, staff should not create new infornlation in response to candidate requests, unless Council approves the request during a Ineeting. He would memorialize this as a proposed amendment to the Council Handbook. 9. Council of Cities Appointments. City Manager Nagel suggested that Council begin consideration of Council of Cities appointments earlier in the year. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto expressed her frustration with the candidate selection process due to the difficulty of discussing candidates' qualifications on the Dias. She further noted the importance of alliance building when determining the candidate( s) Council would support. Councilman Addiego concurred. Given Council's discomfort with discussing candidates' qualifications from the Dias, Councilman Mullin questioned how Councilmembers could obtain the benefit of each other's institutional knowledge pertaining to respective candidates. City Manager Nagel suggested Council could discuss these items during a study session. Councilman Addiego noted that he was cOlnfortable deferring transportation-related candidate issues to Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto's discretion. He further noted if any other Councilmelnbers had a specialty related to a respective agency, he would defer to that members' judgment in the candidate selection process as well. Council concluded that a study session in late September on the subject of Council of Cities Elections would be appropriate. 10. Board & Commission Appointments. City Manager Nagel introduced the topic as a philosophical discussion pertaining to selection of the most qualified applicants for Board and Commission positions. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 10 Councilmelnbers expressed concern that in the past, some appointlnents nlay have beenlnade on the basis of friendships as opposed to qualifications. Council further questioned its recourse upon being disappointed by a Board or Commission menlber's performance. City Attorney Mattas advised that Council could review and/or reconstitute a Board or Commission mid-term, but cautioned the public nlight perceive this as being very political. He further noted that with any decision of this sort, it is helpful to have established standards governing Comlnissioners' behavior. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto requested that the appointment process include more discussion of applicants' qualifications prior to the vote. Councilmembers agreed this was necessary. Further, the standard interview questions would continue to be asked, but Councilmelnbers could follow- up on an applicant's answers with additional questions if appropriate. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto next questioned the Mayor's plans for dealing with the recently reported absenteeism of Board and Commission members. City Clerk Martinelli-Larson explained that the absenteeism report recently submitted to Council included figures for the 3rd and 4th quarters that had not previously been reported to Council. City Manager Nagel confirmed that letters from the Mayor were being issued to Board or Commission members after two absences. But he noted that Council had to make a determination with respect to enforcement of the absenteeism policy. (Cassette Tape No.2) Council determined that after issuance of the letters, the Mayor would speak with affected Board and Commissionlnembers to discuss the circumstances surrounding the absenteeism. If the Mayor believed the circumstances warranted dismissal, he would bring the issue to Council for determination. Recess: 12:17 p.m. Meeting Resulned: 12:39 p.m. 11. City Council Mileage Reimbursement. City Manager Nagel introduced the topic as a discussion pertinent to a flat monthly fee option for Council mileage reimbursement. Councilman Addiego opined that it was somewhat cumbersome to track mileage associated with travel for Council activities and suggested a flat fee option as an alternative, but noted the taxability of a flat fee was undesirable. Councilmembers agreed. City Attorney Mattas advised Council could direct staff to prepare an amendment to the City Council Handbook establishing a policy whereby Councilmembers could elect a straight mileage SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 11 reimburselnent option or a flat-fee option that would not exceed historicalnoDns based upon an average of what has been clailned by SSF City Councilmembers in the past. Councilnlembers noted that the policy requiring the City car to be used by Councilmembers whenever feasible would relnain in tact. They detennined, however, that the budget subcommittee might consider the option of purchasing a nlore fuel efficient car. 12. Departing Councilmenlbers TelecOlnlnunications Equiplnent, etc. Councilman Garbarino opined there should be an established check-out procedure when a person leaves Council. City Manager Nagel advised that departing Councilnlembers have had the opportunity to purchase their equiplnent, including the home computer and fax. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto stated that the equipment purchase option and all departure practices should be set forth in the City Council Handbook. Councilmembers agreed. City Manager Nagel also proposed the question of whether business cards for retired Councilmembers would be appropriate or allowable. Council detennined that such cards would be inappropriate. 13. City Council Office Supplies. City Manager Nagel suggested that Council office supply orders should be routed through the City Manager's Office for the purpose of obtaining discounts such as those affiliated with bulk orders. Councilmelnbers agreed. 14. Farmers' Market. Councihnan Garbarino noted his admiration for the concept of a farmer's market but opined that the current farmer's market was not as successful as it could be due to lack of vendors. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto proposed that Council decide if it wanted to renew the farmer's market contract for one more year in a new venue, such as the plaza by the BART station. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn advised that the BART plaza was designed for this type of use. Council directed staff to speak with BART and the Pacific Farmer's Market Exchange to determine if the venue was feasible. If this option was workable, Council would consider renewing the contract for another year. 15. Other- Council Priorities Revisited. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 12,2008 PAGE 12 Mayor Pro Tern Matsulnoto identified the Sculpture Garden as a priority. She further included increased focus on Planning issues, including zoning updates and development of a vision of where South San Francisco is going as a City. She also sought Council's opinion with respect to resurrecting meetings of the North County Division of the Council of Cities, which Council approved of. Councihnan Garbarino identified defining where South San Francisco is as a City with respect to the development process, particularly concerning Grand Avenue and the City's historical park, as a priority. He further prioritized increased consistency in the Planning Department's interactions with residents. Councilman Mullin stated downtown revitalization as a priority. He further included green building and pminerships between the City and the School District amongst his priorities. He articulated the additional priorities of intergovernmental advocacy vis-a vis state and federal government and utilization of pre-existing state and federal relationships to benefit the City fiscally. Councilman Addiego stated working with the School Board as a priority, including supporting mechanisms that might release City funds to benefit specific school programs. He stressed the importance of a first rate public school system to the viability of the community. He further stated the dream of re-installing a light electric rail system silnilar to the one which ran prior to the time the City was established. He explained the rail system could link the means of public transportation in the City, including the ferry terminal, the Caltrain station and BART and move through the Chestnut A venue/EI Camino Real area. Mayor Gonzalez advised he is plamling Breakfast with the Mayor Sessions with small businesses in the Grand Avenue area in both Spanish and English. He also reported his intent to meet with members of churches in the community regarding their concerns. He stated priorities of stationing cmneras in different parts of the City to capture issues related to crime, gangs and traffic. He also included anti-graffiti efforts in the area of Olive, Armor and Linden amongst his priorities. REDEVELOPMENT MEETING ADJOURNEMENT Being no further business, the Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned at 1 :33 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION 16. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957) Positions: City Manager and City Attorney Tinle entered into Closed Session: Tinle reconvened into Open Session: 1 :33 p.nl. 3:30 p.m., Councihnen Addiego, Garbal-ino alld Mullin, Mayor Pro TelTI Matsunloto and Mayor Gonzalez present. SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 12,2008 PAGE 13 Report out of closed Session by Mayor Gonzalez: No reportable action was taken. CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, Mayor Gonzalez adjourned the nleeting at 3 :30 p.m. Approved: Pedro Gonzalez, May City of SOUtll San Fr;:mcisco Chainnall, Redevelopnlent Agency SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 12,2008 PAGE 14