Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-03-12 e-packet AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY MARCH 12, 2008 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. PEDRO GONZALEZ Chair KARYL MATSUMOTO Vice Chair MARK N. ADDIEGO Boardmember RICHARD A. GARBARINO Boardmember KEVIN MULLIN Boardmember RICHARD BATTAGLIA Investment Officer KRISTA MARTINELLI-LARSON Clerk BARRY M. NAGEL Executive Director STEVEN T. MATTAS Counsel PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS A V AILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMP AIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of February 13,2008. 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of March 12,2008. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 3. Resolution authorizing the execution of a contract with Watry Design, Inc. for construction design of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure. CLOSED SESSION 4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8, real property negotiations for property located at 209 Baden A venue; Agency Negotiator: Assistant Director Marty Van Duyn; Owner: City of South San Francisco. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AGENDA MARCH 12,2008 PAGE 2 RDA AGENffjpITEM,# 1 ." MINUTES DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 13,2008 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Boardmembers Addiego, Garbarino and Mullin, Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto, Chairman Gonzalez Absent: None. AGENDA REVIEW No Changes. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of January 9, 2008 and January 12, 2008 pursuant to typographical modifications submitted by the City Attorney on February 13,2008. 2. Motion to confirm expense elaims of February 13,2008 in the amount of$28,7l2,684.81. 3. Motion to receive and accept the Redevelopment Agency's Property Report, Blight Report, Annual Report of Financial Transactions, Housing Activities Report and Loan Report, as required by Health and Safety Code 33080.1. 4. Resolution # 3-2008 authorizing the Executive Director to execute a Loan Agreement with Peninsula Habitat for Humanity for the project at 440 Commercial Avenue in South San Francisco and adopting findings in connection therewith. 5. A Resolution # 4-2008 amending Section 3.02 ofthe Redevelopment Agency By-Laws related to regular meeting times and changing the regular Redevelopment Agency meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Motion- Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto/Second- Boardmember Garbarino: To approve the Consent Calendar. Unanimously approved by voice vote. CLOSED SESSION 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to 415- 417 Grand Avenue property. Agency negotiator: Marty Van Duyn, Owner: Dalal Metwalli. Time entered into closed session: 7:04 p.m. Time reconvened into open session: 7 :20 p.m. Report out of closed session: Direction given no action taken. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, Chairman Gonzalez adjourned the meeting at 7:21 p.m. Approved: Pedro Gonzalez, Chairman City of South San Francisco REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 13,2008 PAGE 2 RDA AGE'NDA ITEM # 2 I certify that the demands set forth on this payment register are accurate and funds are available for payment. * Dl\TED: ') \1 \63 ~ JFI~~CE~IRECTOR *Note: Items below do not include payroll related payments Checks: Date Amount 02/13/08 $ 02/20/08 02/27/08 03/05/08 175,891.11 1,679.10 539,473.19 32,274.05 Electronic Payments: Date Amount 02/29/08 $ 1,611,529.95 To Bank of New York Description RDA Bonds Debt Service Total Payments $ 2,360,847.40 This is to certify that the above bills were confirmed at the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco held March 12, 2008. DT,TED: CHAIR CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO 02-13-08 WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT PAGE 1 PROGRAM NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE ------------ -------------- ----------- ----- -------- ---------- LOW/MODERATE hOUSING 56-10880-4201 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO 2,317.75 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR RDA HOUSING 117086 02/13/08 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 56-10880-4390-1096 ALLIED SECURITY ALARMS 54.00 ALARM SERVICE-380 ALTA VISTA 116909 02/13/08 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 56-10880-4420 SSF SCAVENGER CO INC 28.12 RESIDENTIAL SVC-323 MILLER 117104 02/13/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4201 MUNISERVICES LLC 1,822.42 JAN-MAR08 PROPERTY LINK SVC FEE 117041 02/13/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4201 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO 2,317.75 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR RDA ADMIN. 117086 02/13/08 REDEVELOP OPBRATING 57-10860-4201 MUNISERVICES LLC 46,941.11 PROPERTY TAX AUDIT-PRIOR YEARS 117041 02/13/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4201 MUNISERVICES LLC 109,785.47 PROPERTY TAX AUDIT-CARRY FORWARD 117041 02/13/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4201-0751 CAROLLO ENGINEERS 4,085.26 ENGINEERING SVCS DURING CONSTRUCTION - LINDENVILLE 116948 02/13/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4201-0751 CH2M HILL INC 5,981.24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF SSF RELATED 116952 02/13/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4210-0455 DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANC 2,557.99 OCT-DEC07 CURR CHGS,FORMER BASAPCO SITE 116970 02/13/08 VENDOR TOTAL $175,891.11 GRAND TOTAL $175,891.11 o RECORDS CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO 02-20-0 WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT PAGE 1 PROGRAIVJ NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE ------------ -------------- ----------- ------------------- - - -- LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 56-10880-4210 PETE'S ROTOTILLING & L 100.00 YEARLY SERVICE FOR 4 PROPERTIES 117268 02/20/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4360 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR C 91.50 JAN08 PEST CONTROL SERVICE 117333 02/20/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4250-0752 ON DEMAND REPROGRAPHIC 790.55 REPRODUCTION 117258 02/20/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4250-0752 ROZZI REPRODUCTION & S 27.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117286 02/20/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4250-0752 ROZZI REPRODUCTION & S 637.99 COPY SVC-PLAN PHASE V-C LINDERVILLE 117286 02/20/08 FACILITIES CAPITAL P 58-13232-4310-0320 STEELE. JIM 32.00 PETTY CASH REIMB 117314 02/20/08 VENDOR TOTAL $1,679.10 GRAND TOTAL $1. 679 .10 E RECORDS CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO 02 27~08 WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT PAGE 1 PROGRAM NAME ACCODNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE -----~----_.- -------------- ----------- ------------------- ------- LOW/MODERATE HOOSING 56~10880~4201 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO 2,226.50 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR RDA HOUSING 117492 02/27/08 LOW/NOD3RATE HOUSING 56 10880~4240~1096 JACKSON CONSTRUCTION 3,075.00 REMOVE/INSTALL FENCE AT 380 ALTA VISTA 117431 02/27/08 LOW/~10DERATE HOUSING 56~10880~4301 OFFICE DEPOT INC 175.32 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 117462 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57~10860.4201 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO 2,226.50 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR RDA ADMIN. 117492 02/27/08 PEDEVELOP OFERATING 57-10860-4220 BIOCOM 12,500.00 EXHIBIT FEE DEPOSIT~2ND INSTALLMENT 117370 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4301 KELSO COMr~UNICATIONS 874.66 EQUIPMENT-TELEPHONE 117436 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4360 SOUTH CITY REFRIGERATI 4,325.00 REPLACE WATER HEATER-306 SPRUCE 11 7 503 02/27/08 P.EDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4360 ART'S PENINSULA LOCKSM 1,423.71 LOCK REPAIR 117359 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4360 THYSSENDRUPP ELEVATOR 110.00 YEARLY MAINT.SERVICE 117523 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATl~G 57-10860-4360 SOUTH CITY REFRIGERATI -1,000.00 CREDIT MEMO FOR INV 44437 117503 02/27/08 RED6VELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4360 SOUTH CITY REFRIGERATI 4,685.00 REPLACE BOILER EXPANSION TANK 117503 02/27/08 REDEVELOP OPERATING 57-10860-4393 LA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL 1,250.00 07-08 GRANT -CODE ENFORCEMENT 117439 02/27/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4201-0751 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES IN 28,170.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE 117425 02/27/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4210-0751 NORTH VALLEY BANK 47,942.00 10% RETENTION-JMB CONSTRUCTION 117459 02/27/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4210-0751 JMB CONSTRUCTION INC 431,478.00 CONSTRUCTION OF LINDENVILLE STORM DRAIN PUMP STATI 117432 02/27/08 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU 58-13231-4310-0751 BUHAGIAR. DOROTHY 11.50 PETTY CASH REIMB 11 73 78 02/27/08 VENDOR TOTAL $539,473.19 GRAND TOTAL $539,473.19 16 RECORDS FRANCISCO SAN CITY OF SO PAGE DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 CK CK # 117586 117603 117698 117698 117698 117698 117595 117646 117595 117715 117586 117605 117605 117608 117612 117698 117550 117680 117662 117662 117680 WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT I) 05 OJ MILLER MILLER COMMERCIAL AVE INVOICE/DESCRIPTION REPORT - 314 MILLER ESA SERVICE SVC-312 I DELIVERY COMM CAN RES SVC-310 SVC-341 CAN PHASE RES RES Al'lOUNT 2007 30 AVE FY ENDING JUNE V-C PHASE DRAINAGE SIDEWALKS POA DUES COMM CONTAINER-306 SPRUCE AVE ADVERTISE LINDENVILLE IMPROVEMENT COPIES OF PLANS FOR LINDENVILLE COPIES SPECS/GEOTECH RPTS COPIES SPECS/GEOTECH RPTS COPIES PLANS FOR LINDENVILLE CONSULTANT AUDIT SERVICES CONSULTANT SERVICES ATTORNEY SERVICES-AIRPORT ISSUE PHASE I ESA REPORT-216 BADEN BIOSCIENCE MEMBERSHIP LOOPNET QUARTERYLY DUES PRESSURE WASH DOWNTOWN SVC-339 COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR OF OF 496.25 20.18 85.18 63.89 42.59 42.59 465.00 118.00 804.48 877.50 991.25 500.00 134.85 160.00 914.82 296.24 712.76 161.40 273.11 786.67 3<:7.29 2 SERV INC INC INC INC VENDOR NAME CSS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDEX SSF SCAVENGER CO SSF SCAVENGER CO SSF SCAVENGER CO SSF SCAVENGER CO ACCOUNT NUMBER 56-10880-4240-1081 56-10880-4301 56-10880-4390-1096 56-10880-4420-1098 56-10880-4420-1568 PROGRAM NAME LOW LOW/MODERATE HOUSING LOW/MODERATE HOUSING LOW/MODERATE HOUSING LOW/MODERATE HOUSING LOW/MODERATE HOUSING REDEVELOP OPERATING HOUSING 1'10DERATE 2 2 7 G SERV BHATIA ASSOCIATES & BHATIA WELLMAN, KATHARINE CSS ENVIRONMENTAL FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FLEETWASH INC & & DYETT MAZE DYETT 10880-4420-1568 10860-4201 -0131 5 PROPERTY OWNER CO INC GATEWAY SSF SCAVENGER ANG NEWSPAPER ROZZI REPRODUCTION & S ON DEMAND REPROGRAPHIC ON DEMAND REPROGRAPHIC ROZZI REPRODUCTION S 56 '07 57-10860 57-10860-4201 57-10860 57-10860 57 10860-4310 10860-4310 10860-4360 10860-4360-0225 57-10860-4360-1086 58-13231-4230-0752 58-13231-4250-0752 58-13231-4250-0752 58-13231-4250-0752 58-13231-4250 -4201 -4210 -4240 REDEVELOP OPERATiNG REDEVELOP OPERATING REDEVELOP OPERATING REDEVELOP OPERATING REDEVELOP OPERATING 57- 57- 57- REDEVELOP OPERATING OPERATING OPERATING INFRASTRUCTU INFRASTRUCTU INFRASTRUCTU INFRASTRUCTU REDEVELOP OPERATING REDEVELOP REDEVELOP GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL DRAINAGE OF & -0752 INFRASTRUCTU 05 274 $32 VENDOR TOTAL 05 274 $32 GRAND TOTAL RECORDS 21 - ~'tR S:M' Ii 10 n >- - ~ ~ '"' c c;,lIFOt\.~\.~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RDA AGENDA ITEM # 3 Redevelopment Agency Staff REport March 12,2008 Redevelopment Agency Board Marty Van Duyn, Assistant Director A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH WATRY DESIGN, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF THE MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Watry Design, Inc. to design the Miller Avenue Parking Structure. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION On February 14, 2007, the Redevelopment Agency Board approved a concept financing plan for a new Downtown parking structure and authorized staff to begin utilizing a $150,000 allocation in the 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Budget for initial planning, engineering and special studies for the project. On June 4, 2007 the City Council conducted a study session to review parking structure design concepts and authorized staff to proceed with planning and design of a 4)1z to 511 story parking structure with ground floor commercial space. The City Council then approved the 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Budget on Jum: 13, 2007, which includes a $10,000,000 appropriation for design and construction of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure. Staff initially approached the architectural firm that had developed the structure's conceptual designs to request a proposal for design services and contract administration. As described in staff s memorandum to Council dated August 31, 2007, delays in receiving a draft proposal from this firm led staff to make contact with two additional design firms specializing in parking structure projects (Watry Design, Inc. and International Parking Design) to solicit additional proposals, consistent with the Council's direction to complete this project with expediency as well as attention to quality of design. Watry Design, Inc., responded to staff s inquiry with a full scope of services and a schedule indicating a seven month time savings over the competing firm. On October 5, 2007, staff reported to Council via memorandum that Watry Design, Inc. was retained to begin schematic design of the parking structure. Staff Report To: Redevelopment Agency Board RE: Miller Avenue Parking Structure Design Date: March 12,2008 Page 2 of3 As of December 27, 2007, the concept design and the schematic phases of the project were substantially complete. The project has now progressed into the construction drawings phase per Council's action on December 12, 2007, which approved the schematic design with comments and directed staff to proceed with the construction and bidding documents phases, pending environmental review. Watry Design, Inc. has provided staff with the attached proposal to prepare construction drawings, bid packages and construction administration services, including the development of design criteria to allow bid alternates for a roof mounted solar array, enhanced video surveillance and geothermal heating and cooling. Watry Design, lnc.'s budget to complete this work totals $1,101,232. The project schedule anticipates commencement of construction activities on or around October 30, 2008. FUNDING The 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Budget includes an appropriation of$lO,OOO,OOO for design and construction of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure, funded from Redevelopment Agency Funds. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Watry Design, Inc. to complete the construction documents and competitive bid packages for the Miller A venue Parking Structure. BY:c!l~~ Marty VanDuyn Assistant Director Approved: CJh.~~~P Executive Director ATTACHMENTS Redevelopment Agency Resolution Watry Design, Inc. Scope of Services Time Schedule RESOLUTION NO. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH WATRY DESIGN, INe. FOR CONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF THE MILLER AVENUE PAREING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco ("Agency") is a redevelopment agency existing pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq. (the "CRL"), and pursuant to the authority granted thereunder, has the responsibility to carry out the Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Downtown/Central Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area "); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco has appropriated $10,000,000 in the 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Budget for the design and construction of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure; and WHEREAS, Watry Design, Inc. and Group 4 ArchitectureIWalker Parking Consultants submitted proposals for the design and construction administration of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure, though Watry Design, Inc. was able to provide a full scope of services and complete delivery seven months earlier than Group 4 ArchitectureIW alker Parking Consultants; and WHEREAS, Watry Design, Inc. has completed schematic designs of the Miller Avenue Parking Structure, and is prepared to proceed with construction drawings, bid packages, and construction administration services for an amount not to exceed $1,101,232, as detailed in their proposal, attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, analyzing the proposed project's effects on the environment and concluding that after mitigation, the project will not have any significant environmental impacts. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco does hereby authorize the Executive Director or his designee, to execute a contract with Watry Design, Inc., not to exceed $1,101,232, to complete the construction design and documents and competitive bid packages for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held the day of , 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Clerk EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES February 29, 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project consists of a new multistory parking garage with street-level commercial space, to be located on Miller Avenue in South San Francisco. The requirements and general geometry of the proposed garage will be based on Garage Concept 2A of the Miller Avenue Parking Garage Feasibility Study presented to the South San Francisco City Council on June 4th, 2007 and consistent with the Schematic Design reviewed by the City Council on December 12, 2007. The Project will not include improvements to 4th Lane or other off site improvements. The parking structure project consists of a 4 Y2 level parking structure containing approximately 256 stalls and approximately 13,700 square feet of ground floor commercial space. The structural frame is considered to be cast-in-place concrete, shear wall, long span system with a shallow foundation system per the soils report. Assumptions: 1. Geotechnical Report and Site Survey are provided by the City. 2. The Public Works Agency will supply City standard bidding requirements; including bid proposal, contract forms and agreement, and General Conditions pertaining to the Owner and General Contractor Agreement. WDI and its ,consultants will provide the rema;n;ng necessary technical specifications in CSI format, including Divisions 1 through 16. Exclusions from Basic Fee: 1. This agreement does not include services related to Project Peer Review or Special Inspections. SCOPE OF SERVICES Basic Services to be provided are as follows. Section 1 - Basic Services 1.1 Construction Documents Phase 1.1.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend design coordination meetings with the City, not to exceed 4. 1.1.2 Based on the City approved Design Documents and any further adjustments in the scope of the Project or in the construction budget authorized by the City, Watry Design, Inc. shall prepare, for approval by the City, Construction Documents consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project covered by this agreement. The Contract Documents are to include the following: Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29,2008 Page 1 of 11 . Parking Level Plans . Structural Foundation Plans . Structural Framing Plans . Structural Calculations . Parking Level Drainage Plan . Exterior Elevations . Building Cross Sections . Enlarged Floor Plans (of specific areas as needed) . Typical Wall Sections . Architectural and Structural engineering Details . Mechanical Plans and Details . Electrical Plans and Details . Security Plans and Details . Civil Plans and Details . Landscape Plans and Details . Signage Plans and Details . Project Specifications 1.1.3 Watry Design, Inc. shall prepare Structural Calculations for the Primary Structural System for submittal to Governing Building Officials. 1.1.4 Watry Design, Inc. shall designate elements to be designed by Specialty Engineers. The Contract Documents shall specify Structural Design Criteria, type of element, position within structure and connection to Primary Structural System, and required Submittals. 1.1.5 Watry Design, Inc. shall review the effect of Secondary and Non-Structural elements on the Primary Structural System and design the Primary Structural System to accept and support such items. The Contract Documents shall provide information regarding the supporting capability and physical attachment limitations of the Primary Structural System. 1.1.6 Watry Design, Inc. shall designate on the Contract Documents all required Special Inspection and Testing. 1.1.7 Civil Engineer shall provide final site demolition plans, on-site grading and drainage plans, on-site storm, sanitary and water plans including relocations as needed, horizontal layout of site electrical, gas, and telecommunication systems, off-site plans for site frontage improvements consisting of utility services, sidewalks, driveways, and curb replacement, fire design plan with pipe sizing, flow analysis, and fire system layout including fire hydrants, FDC's and PIV's for bidding purposes for site work only. 1.1.8 Security Consultant shall design the conduit for a future security system and develop and provide all required drawings, details, and installation for the conduit system.. 1.1.9 Mechanical Engjneer shall provide construction documents for the mechanical and plumbing systems. They shall also provide envelope Title 24 documentation Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 2 of 11 for the retail shell. They shall also provide performance plans and specifications for a fire protection design / build contract. 1.1.10 Electrical Engineer shall provide construction documents and specifications for the electrical systems including lighting systems. 1.1.11 Landscape Archiltect shall provide specifications and construction documents for landscape plants, materials, drainage, irrigation, and any special landscape features. 1.1.12 Signage Consultant shall provide specifications and construction documents for the signs that include interior and exterior signage and code required signage. 1.1.13 Cost Estimator shall finalize Opinion of Probable Construction Cost with input from Watry Design, Inc. 1.1.14 Watry Design, Inc. and all subconsultants shall respond in writing to Governing Building Official's comments on Contract Documents. Watry Design, Inc. will coordinate responses from all subconsultants. 1.2 Plan Check Phase 1.2.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall submit drawings to the Building Official for Plan Check. 1.2.2 Watry Design, Inc. and subconsultants shall respond to questions of Building Official and issm~ the fmal set for Bidding. 1.3 Bidding Phase 1.3.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall attend the prebid meeting at the site. 1.3.2 Watry Design, Inc. shall respond to questions from the General Contractors as it pertains to the bidding process by issuing addenda and assist the City in evaluating bids as requested. 1.4 Construction Administration Phase 1.4.1 Watry Design, Inc.'s responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction Administration Phase under this Agreement commences with the issuance of a contract between the City and a Contractor and terminates at the issuance to the Owner of the CeItificate of Occupancy. The anticipated length of construction is estimated to be 60 weeks. 1.4.2 Duties, responsibilities, and limitations of authority of Watry Design, Inc. shall not be restricted, modified or extended without written agreement between the City and Watry Design, Inc. 1.4.3 Contractor shall send all required submittals directly to Watry Design, Inc. for review and copy the City. The Contractor shall maintain an updated log of all Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 3 of 11 submittals and RFI's. Watry Design, Inc. shall review Contractor submittals pertaining to items designed by Watry Design, Inc. such as shop drawings, product data, samples and other data as required by Watry Design, Inc., but only for the limited purpose of checking for general conformance with the design concept and the information expressed in the Contract Documents prepared by Watry Design, mc. This review shall not include review of the accuracy or completeness of details, such as quantities, dimensions, weights or gauges, fabrication processes, construction means or methods, coordination of the work with other trades or construction safety precautions, all of which are the sole responsibility of the Contractor. Watry Design, Inc.'s review shall be conducted with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient time in Watry Design, Inc.'s judgment to permit adequate review. Review of a specific item shall not indicate that Watry Design, Inc. has reviewed the entire assembly of which the item is a compommt. The General Contractor shall review all submittals prior to Watry Design, Inc.'s review. Each submittal shall be stamped that the General Contractor has reviewed the submittal. Watry Design, Inc. shall not be responsible for any deviations from the contract documents not brought to the attention of Watry Design, Inc. in writing by the Contractor. Watry Design, Inc. shall not be required to review partial submissions or those for which submissions of correlated items have not been received. Watry Design, Inc. shall maintain the discretion to return partial or incomplete submittals to the Contractor. Watry Design, Inc. shall mark up one reproducible copy, return it to the Contractor and copy the City. Number of submittals is assumed to be 200. 1.4.4 Watry Design, Inc. shall also review submittals pertaining to Structural Elements specified by Watry Design, Inc. and designed by Specialty Engineers. Watry Design Inc shall: . Determine whether Submittals have received prior approvals as required by the Contract Documents. . Determine whether Submittals bear the signature and professional seal of the Specialty Engineer responsible for the design as required by the Contract Documents. . Include review of any Pre-Engineered Structural Elements and shall be for the type, position, and connection to other elements within the Primary Structural System, and for criteria and loads used for their design. . Include determination that structural elements are necessary for a stable structure will be provided. 1.4.5 Watry Design, Inc. shall visit the proj ect at appropriate intervals during construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the contracts' work and to determine if the work is preceding in general accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by Watry Design, Inc. The City has not retained Watry Design, Inc. to make detailed inspections or to provide exhaustive or continuous project review and observation services. Watry Design, Inc. does not guarantee the performance of, and shall have no responsibility for, the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractor, supplier or any other entity furnishing materials or performing any work on the project. Watry will attend construction meetings/site visits on the average of a bi-weekly basis, assumed to be a Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 4 of 11 maximum of 30. The number of structural visits prior to slab pours is not to exceed 15. 1.4.6 Neither the professional activities of Watry Design, Inc., nor the presence of Watry Design, 1m;. or his or her employees and sub-consultants at a construction site, shall relieve the General Contractor and any other entity of their obligations, duties and responsibilities including, but not limited to, construction means, methods, sequence, techniques or procedures necessary for performing, superintending or coordinating all portions of the Work of construction in accordance with the contract documents and any health or safety precautions required by any n~gulatory agencies. Watry Design, Inc. and his or her personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety precautions. The City agrees that the General Contractor is solely responsible for jobsite safety, and warrants that this intent shall be made evident in the City's agree:ment with the General Contractor. The City also agrees that Watry Design, Ine. shall be indemnified and shall be made additional insureds under the General Contractor's general liability policy. 1.4.7 Watry Design, Inl:;. shall have the authority to reject any work of the Contractor that is not, in the professional judgment of Watry Design, Inc., in accordance with the plans, specifications and other construction documents. Neither this authority nor the good faith judgment to reject or not to reject any such work shall subject Watry Design, Inc. to any liability or cause of action on behalf of the contractor, subcontractors or any other suppliers or persons performing portions of the work on this project. 1.4.8 Interpretations and decisions of Watry Design, Inc. shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and initial decisions, Watry Design, Inc. shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by the City or the Contractor, shall not show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions so rendered in good faith. 1.4.9 Watry Design, Ine. shall be a representative of and shall advise and consult with the City during construction until final payment to the Contractor is due. Watry Design, Inc. shall have authority to act on behalf of the City only to the extent provided in this Agreement unless otherwise modified by written instrument. 1.4.1 0 Watry Design, Ine.'s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. 1.4.11 Watry Design, Ine. shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance of the Contractor under the requirements of the Contract Documents, on written request by the City. Watry Design, Inc.'s response to such request shall be made with reasonable promptness and within any time limits agreed upon. 1.4.12 Watry Design, Ine. shall conduct periodic reviews to determine the date of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion, and shall receive and forward to the City for the City's review and records written warranties and Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 5 of 11 related documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor. Watry Design, Inc. shall recommend issuance of a final Certificate for Payment by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 1.4.13 Watry Design, Inc. shall render written decisions within a reasonable time on all claims, disputes or other matters in question between the City and Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the Work as provided in the Contract Documents if asked to do so. 1.4.14 The City warrants he or she will cause the Contractor to review any request for information (RFI's) submitted by subcontractors prior to submission to Watry Design, Inc. to ensure such RFI's are not already clearly and unambiguously answered in the Contract Documents. Watry Design, Inc. shall be paid by the City form Contractor retention for time spent reviewing RFI's which are already clearly answered on the Contract Documents, in accordance with Watry Design, Inc.'s standard rates. In the event of disagreement over such compensation, the judgment of the City's representative shall prevail. 1.5 Consultants 1.5.1 Watry Design, Inc. shall hire the following proposed consultants to prepare documents for the project based on their expertise: . Civil Engineering and Surveying: Wilsey & Ham . Security Consulting: Tomasi Dubois & Associates, Inc.. . Mechanical, Plumbing Engineering and FP criteria: List Engineering . Electrical Engineering: Engineering Enterprise . Landscape Architecture: Merrill Morris Partners · Signage Design: Donnelly Design . Cost Estimating: O'Connor Construction Management, Inc. . Photovoltaic: Kenwood Energy Section 2 - Additional Services 2.1 General 2.1.1 Services beyond those outlined under Basic Services may be requested. They are categorized as Additional, Special or Extra Services. These services may be provided by WatIy Design, Inc. under terms mutually agreed upon by the City and Watry Design, Inc. 2.2 Special Services 2.2.1 Special Services are services that mayor may not be foreseen at the beginning of design stages, and are not normally included as Basic Services. Examples include, but are not limited to: 2.2.1.1 Services related to the analysis of the City's future needs and programming the future requirements. Watry Design, Inc. will work with the retail consultant to program the retail space. Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29,2008 Page 6 of 11 2.2.1.2 2.2.1.3 2.2.1.4 2.2.1.5 2.2.1.6 2.2.1.7 2.2.1.8 2.2.1.9 2.2.1.10 2.2.1.11 2.2.1.12 2.2.1.13 2.2.1.14 2.3 Extra Services Services related to financial feasibility or other special fiscal studies. Services related to off-site planning surveys, off-site site evaluations or comparative studies of prospective sites. Services related to the structural design of Non-Structural Elements and their attachments, such as: . Window washing systems and tie downs. . Antennas and flagpoles. Services related to special dynamic analysis such as spectrum or time-history response to seismic forces, or floor-response analysis for footfall or vibratory equipment. Services related to special wind analyses, such as wind-tunnel test, etc. Services related to "seismic risk" analysis. Field Investigation of existing Buildings and structures, except fiJr the investigation of potential soil nails of the adjacent building that are on the site underground. Services connected with the preparation of documents for segregated Contracts for phased or fast track construction. Continuous and/or detailed inspections of construction. Design or review related to contractor's construction related equipment, e.g., cranes hoist, etc. Design for future expansion, facilities, systems and equipment. Preparation of shop or fabrication Drawings, for example r1einforcing and structural steel detailing, etc. Services provided after the issuance to the City of the final Certificate of Retention Payment, or in the absence of a fmal Certificate for Retention Payment, more than 60 days after the date the Notice of Completion is filed at the County Recorder. 2.3.1 Extra Services arle services that arise as a result of unforeseen circumstances during the design or construction process. Examples include, but are not limited to: 2.3.1.1 Services resulting from changes in scope or magnitude of the project as described and agreed to under the Basic Services Agreement. 2.3.1.2 Services resulting from revisions due to the enactment or revision of codes, laws, or regulations subsequent to the preparation of documents. 2.3.1.3 Services resulting from revisions due to changes required as a result of the City's failure to render decisions in a timely manor. 2.3.1.4 Services resulting from corrections or revisions required because of errors or omissions in construction by the Contractor. 2.3.1.5 Services resulting from damage, as the result of fires, man made disasters, or acts of God. 2.3.1.6 Review and design ofaltemate or substitute systems during construction. 2.3.1.7 Review of additional shop drawing Submittals when occasioned by improper handling or coordination by the Contractor. 2.3.1.8 Overtime work required by the City. Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 7 of 11 2.4 Accepted Additional Services 2.4.1 Pre-schematic / Sehematic Phase added scope": 2.4.1.1 Added City Council meeting 2.4.1.2 Downtown merchants meeting 2.4.1.3 Council member design review meeting 2.4.2 Expanded securiW system: 2.4.2.1 Provision of added security system components requested by the Owner. 2.4.3 Geothermal HV AC system: 2.4.3.1 Mechanic:al: Boring layout, mechanical design of HV AC system for each zone of anticipated individual tenant space. 2.4.3.2 Electrical design of support systems, controls for each zone of anticipate~d individual tenant space HV AC equipment. 2.4.3.3 Architectural and Structural coordination of above components 2.4.4 Mixed use, Officc~ area: 2.4.4.1 HV AC system design, plumbing and fire protection design, specifications. 2.4.4.2 Electrical systems design, lighting plan, electrical conduit! outlets planes), specifications 2.4.4.3 Architectural design of office and associated rooms, floor plans, reflected ceiling plans, interior elevations, fixture layout, sections, finish schedule, door-window schedule, details, specifications. 2.4.4.4 Structural design of slab on grade conditions, footings, floor plans, sections details. 2.4.4.5 Signage design, room ill, etc.. 2.4.5 Mixed use, Food service: 2.4.5.1 Design criteria for mechanical, plumbing, fire protection systems to design for built in capabilities to accommodate integration of future systems of food service use. 2.4.5.2 Design criteria for electrical systems to design for built in capabilities to accommodate integration of future systems of food service use. 2.4.5.3 Structural design of slab penetrations for future exhaust ducting system. Architectural, structural coordination between disciplines 2.4.6 Photovoltaic (PV) System Assessment: The City of South San Francisco is in the initial stages of evaluating solar photovoltaic (PV) energy opportunities at its Miller Street parking structure. The City's objectives are to: . Gain a preliminary understanding ofPV technologies and applications. . Understand the economics of solar energy. . Understand the impact of solar energy on greenhouse gas emissions. . Obtain competitive proposals for the installation ofPV. Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29,2008 Page 8 of 11 2.4.6.1 Evaluation ofPV Potential · Kick-off Meeting: Successful projects begin with development of a detailed work plan and schedule. A kick-off meeting will help to ensure that all expectations are clearly understood at the outset. The kick-off meeting is an effective way to finalize the scope of each of the following tasks, develop an implementation schedule, review expectations, and to obtain drawings and other materials that will be required to complete the project. · Site Assessment: Kenwood Energy will utilize plan documents to generate an estimate of the facility's future energy use, and will evaluate the area suited for PV installation. · Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Kenwood Energy will utilize its proprietary Photovoltaic Energy Production tool to assess the value of the energy produced by each system. The tool takes into account such factors as local solar radiation, system inclination and orientation angles, panel efficiency, inverter efficiency, the utility's electric rate, the facility energy use, and the effects of heat and dirt on PV system performance. We will then complete a life cycle analysis that accounts for installation costs, ongoing maintenance costs, energy cost inflation, PV panel output degradation, rebates, and discount rates. . Report: Kenwood Energy will complete a report that summarizes the fmdings. Following is the anticipated outline for the Report. - Executive Summary - Description of the PV options, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. - Overview of Incentive Programs. - Financial Analysis results summary. Summary and recommendations. 2.4.6.2 Bid Specification Development: Kenwood Energy will support Watry in the development of a comprehensive bid specification that can be used as part of the bid documents. The specification will: . Defme the objectives of the City . Describe the Scope of Work to be provided . Specify the PV System energy output criteria . Detail warranty and performance standards . Establish quality standards . Detail bid submittal, pre-construction submittal, and post construction submittal requirements . Specify material requirements . Detail installation standards . Defme the requirements of the Data Acquisition System . Outline commissioning and start-up requirements 2.4.6.3 PV Architectural: . Meetings; programming; preparation of Design Criteria Document (DB). . Specifications . Development and documentation of details, added information to elevations, sections, enlarged elevations/ sections and floor plans Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 9 of 11 . Coordination between disciplines and regulatory agencies. . Bid support . CA support . Project management 2.4.6.4 PV Structural: . Calculations, structural design of upgrade of building components to support the added gravity and lateral loads. Design of steel framing to support the PV arrays and its connection to building is provided by the Design Builder contractor. . Development and documentation of details, including embeds, etc. to accept connection of steel frame . Bid support . CA support PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE Phase 101 Phase 102 Phase 103 Phase 104 Phase 105 Phase 106 Phase 300 Phase 301 Phase 302 Phase 400 Phase 500 Phase 501 Phase 600 Phase 601 Phase 999 Schematic Add Services Security Add Services Geothermal Loop Office Tenant Improvements Food Service Management for Add service Construction Documents finish PV Design PV Management Plan Check Bidding PV Bidding Construction Administration PV Const. Administration Reimbursables $5,200 $4,000 $16,000 $30,000 $13,500 $4,650 $592,705 $28,120 $1,372 $28,000 $34,000 $3,200 $289,000 $3,200 $48.285 $1,101,232 TOTAL PROPOSED SCHEDULE February 29, 2008 Page 10 of 11 Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A --rcf-~TaskNa"ie--------------------- Duration -O---City orSouII1San FraiiCTsco-pS---------------~n2wks 1 Program Confirmation/Kickoff Phase 0.6 wks --2--' Prepare Schedule and work plan 2 day! --:r-- PMT Meeting 1 day -----4--- Design Values Workshop Phase 2.8 wks -----s--' In house design and analy sis of Options 5 day! 6 Prepare massing renderings of two options 3 day! --r--- Maxim urn of 4 perspective architectural renderings 5 day! 8 Design Values Workshop 1 day 9 Prepare Cost Model 2 day! -10-- .. PM! Meeting 1 day --n--- Design Phase I Downtown Subcommittee/Community Input 9 wks -12- Preparepreserrtalion malerials2 preferred options . 5 day! . 13 Downtown Subcommittee. Community Input Meeting 1 day -1~ Update Cost Model 2 day! '15 PMT Meeting 1 day ---16--' Additional Community Input 36 day! -17-~~ [jesignPhase-Il'~'CIiy Council APproval . T4wk$ ---18--- Prepare presentation materials 5 day! -19- CitY Council Meeting . 1 day 20 PMT Meeting 1 day .~,--: Schematic Design Documents 10.2 wks ... - 22----: Subconsuttants prepare documents 40 day! --23-- Documents submitted to City 1 day ----2-,r-' City Review of documents 10day! --25--', Environmental Clearance 16 wks -26: .... Construction'OocumentS Phase 30 wks- 27' Prepare 15% Construction Documents 5 wks r-28---: Prepare 90% Construction Documents 12 wks --29- City Review 1 wk ---30--' Prepare Final Pian Check Submittal 1 wk --3"'1'Subrriit for Plan CheCk 1 day 32 City Plan Check 6.2 wks -:33---' First Review 3 wks 34 Respond to comments 1 wk -30-' Second Review 1 wk --30-' Respondlocommenfs ----37-----, Issue Permit -3~ aiddingPhase . -39--- Contractors pick up drawings -.rO-' Pre Bid meeting 41 - Addendum 1 --~42--' Addendum 2 ~-- Bids Due ----44--' Award process -~- Construction 46 Notice to Proceed -47- Construction 48 Construction Complete 1 day 9.6wk$ 1 day 1 day 1wk 1wk fday- 3wks .. 52.4wk$- 1 day 52 wks 1 day Start ---------Finish ~ 9710lo7'------f07307oir 9/10/07 9/10/07 9/12/07 9/13/07 9/13/07 9/20/07 9/20/07 9/27/07 9/28/07 10/2/07 10/3/07 10/3/07 10/10/07 10/11/07 10/15/07 10/16/07 12/5/07 12/5/07 12/12/07 12/13/07 10/3/07 10/3/07 11/28/07 11/29/07 12/13/07 12/14/07 12/14/07 4/3/08 6/26/08 7/3/08 7/10108 7/11/08 7/11/08 811108 8/8/08 8/22/08 8/25/08 8/25/08 9/2/08 9/10/08 9/24/08 10/8/08 - 10/9/08 10/30/08 10/30/08 10/31/08 10/30/09 9/12/07 9/11/07 9/12/07 10/2/07 9/19/07 9/24/07 9/26/07 9/27/07 10/1/07 10/2/07 12/4/07 10/9/07 10/10/07 10/12/07 10/15/07 12/4/07 12/13/07 12/11/07 12/12/07 12/13/07 12/12/07 11/27/07 11/28/07 12/12/07 4/2/08 I 1/10/081 1/171081 I 6/25/08 7/2/08 7/9/08 7/10108 8/22/08 7/31/08 8/7/08 8/14/08 8/21/08 8/22/08 . 10/29/08 8/25/08 9/2/08 9/16/08 9/30/08 10/8/08 10/29/08 10/30/09 10/30/08 10/29/09 10/30/09 20753V ._._.__._,.__._----_._--_.~---------'---~--- _.,_.__._-_.__.~.__._. --_._-----_._----_._._-_._---_._-_._~_._._._-------_..-----.-- Consulting Services Agreement between City of South San Francisco and Watry Design, Inc. - Exhibit A February 29, 2008 Page 11 of 11 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2008 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. PEDRO GONZALEZ Mayor KARYL MATSUMOTO Mayor Pro Tern MARKN. ADDIEGO Councilman RICHARD A. GARBARINO Councilman KEVIN MULLIN Councilman RICHARD BATTAGLIA City Treasurer KRISTA MARTINELLI -LARSON City Clerk BARRY M. NAGEL City Manager STEVEN T. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE lNVOCA TION PRESENTATIONS · Certificate of Recognition presented to Alta Loma Middle School Cheer Squad by Mayor Gonzalez. · County placement of proposed women's gender specific program facility - presented by Sherriff Greg Munks. AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL · Announcements . Committee Reports CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of January 30, 2008, which were approved by the Planning Commission on March 6, 2008, and the February 27, 2007 special and regular meetings. 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of March 12,2008. 3. Motion approving the sculpture, Puzzle People, for the Loan Art Program at the Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden. 4. Resolution approving plans for the use of Proposition 1 B Funds to the City for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 in the amount of$1,007,000.00. 5. Resolution awarding Phase II of the replacement of two playground structures in the Westborough Common Greens Area of Greendale between Kent/Crofton and Radburn, utilizing a cooperative purchasing agreement on Castro Valley's bid. 2007-2008 CIP Project No. 51-13232-0824. 6. Resolution allowing the access and internal roadways at Centennial Towers - Terrabay Phase III - to be considered a private road and accepting Tower Place as the name of said road. Centennial Towers (Terrabay PHIII) on San Bruno Mountain. 7. Resolution expressing support for Proposition 99, a ballot measure initiative entitled the "Homeowners and Private Property Protection Act" appearing on the June 3, 2008 Ballot and Resolution expressing opposition to Proposition 98, a ballot measure initiative entitled the "California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act" appearing on the June 3, 2008 Ballot. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 12,2008 AGENDA PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING 8. Public hearing regarding and consideration of resolution approving a five - month time extension (PCA08-000 1) of a residential planned unit development, tentative subdivision map, design review and lot, setback and parking restriction exceptions related to property located at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the High Denisty (R-3-L) Zone District. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 9. Consideration of a resolution making findings and adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Miller A venue Parking Structure Project. 10. Review of CDBG Subcommittee's proposed CDGB nonprofit agency funding recommendations, hearing of agency petitions and finalization of funding recommendations. COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MARCH 12, 2008 PAGE 3 AGENDA ITEM #1 ~'t\\ 5:1# Ii ~ - ~\-j.\ (0 ("l >- <;;1 \j g C4lIFOp,.~\~ MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT MEETIN G CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2008 MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALLED TO ORDER: MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CALLED TO ORDER: CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL: Present: DRAFT 6:31 p.m. 6:31 p.m. Councilmen Addiego*, Garbarino and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto and Mayor Gonzalez. Absent: None. *Councilman Addiego arrived at 6:38 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL: Commissioners Prouty and Zemke, Vice Chairman Teglia and Chairwoman Giusti. Absent: Commissioners Moore and Sim. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Public comments were limited to items on the Special Joint Meeting Agenda. Resident and Park and Recreation Commissioner Sean Garrone introduced a group of young men interested in suggesting consideration of a skateboard park in the subject property area. He explained that the skateboard park was originally proposed as part of the Orange Park Master Plan, but opined that the property presently under consideration might be more appropriate. Upon questioning by the Planning Commission and Council, Mr. Garrone estimated the cost of the proposed facility as $700,000 based upon the cost of a similar park installed in Pacifica. He further estimated the park would occupy an area of approximately 10,000 square feet. Resident Caesar Correa urged consideration of a skateboard park and explained that youth have no place to skate in the City. Resident Nick Matute opined that the subject property area presented a good location for a skateboard park. He explained the City's youth do not want to damage property by skating in unauthorized areas, but have no other options for skating in the City. Resident Dennis Rosaia, South San Francisco Rotarian Board Member, urged consideration of low income senior housing in the subject property area. He explained the Rotary Club's goal to join in partnership with the City for the purpose of building a 100 unit complex for low income seniors. He opined the location was especially attractive to seniors due to its proximity to public transportation, Kaiser Hospital, shopping, senior recreation services and public parks. Upon questioning from Council and the Planning Commission, Mr. Rosaia explained the Rotary Club hoped the minimum age limit for the project would be 55. He further advised that the Rotary Club did not have a specific location within the subject property area in mind and was open to various planning options for the facility. Resident Joan Marvier urged placement of a new library on the subject property area. Resident Doug Wigton, President of Rotary Plaza Corporation, urged placement of low income senior housing in the subject property area. He described the success of Rotary Plaza, which has been in operation for 36 years and stated that Rotarians hoped to provide additional housing in South San Francisco with the proposed new project. Resident and Library Board Trustee Eleanor Breite urged consideration of a new main library on the subject property and noted the current main library's space limitations. Resident Diane Ingles opined the subject property would be a perfect place for a new main library. She stated there is no room for growth at the current main library. Resident, Educator and Library Board Trustee Cisca Hansen opined that placement of a new main library on the centrally located subject property would serve as a symbol of liberty. PRESENTATION: Visioning by Dan Ionescu, DIAP Companies - overview of city and regional planning philosophy for the Peninsula Region of the Bay Area. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto introduced Architect and City Planner Dan Ionescu ofDIAP Companies. She opined his planning concepts based on high density and open space would benefit plans for development in South San Francisco. SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 2 Mr. Ionescu then provided a visual presentation of his philosophy as follows: He opined that South San Francisco is uniquely situated with access to the Bay crossed by transportation arteries; and further that the City could be an international address based upon it proximity to Silicon Valley and neighboring San Francisco. He observed that while the City has a lot of through-traffic, it could do better to make itself a destination. He noted problems of affordable housing, sustainability and too many parking lots. He stated that modified planning concepts could address these issues and recommended thinking in a regional way. He further advised study of the environment, City history, infrastructure, demographics and the economy as part of developing a vision for South San Francisco. Mr. Ionescu challenged the concept that South San Francisco and neighboring Peninsula Cities are "built-out." He suggested mixed-use buildings with ground level retail units and upper level living units as a solution to this perceived land-use problem. He further stressed the importance of buildings with 24 hour/day uses. He opined that high density, mixed-use and well designed buildings would be critical to sustainability. Commissioner Prouty agreed with Mr. Ionescu's observations pertaining to parking lots located within Peninsula Cities in general. He noted cost-related resistance to putting parking structures underground. He opined that with Council's direction, the Commission could mandate mixed- use buildings with some combination of parking, retail, etc. Councilman Garbarino noted the importance of melding history with plans for future development, specifically in the Downtown District. Commissioner Prouty raised the example of the City of Pasadena, which revitalized its downtown with mixed-use buildings and covered breezeways that fit into the structure of the City. He noted that as a result of this renovation, quality oflife in Pasadena had gone up and the City's economy was enhanced. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined that the City needs higher density housing developments at and above market rate. She noted that higher buildings in the Downtown District would have unobstructed views of the Bay Area that aren't available in other cities. Mr. Ionescu advised that the City's leadership would need to be united in its vision for the future. He opined that 10% of the population would always fight change. He further stressed the importance of engaging and inspiring the community to do the right thing for the City's future. He noted that residents need to see how the overall vision fits into the big picture and overall zoning envelope. As guidelines for South San Francisco, he suggested 6-8 story average building heights with center densities of approximately 100-150 per acre and plenty of open park space. He further opined that at least 50% of buildings should be mixed-use. Councilman Mullin observed initial community resistance to a successful mixed-use project in SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 3 neighboring Daly City. He asked Mr. Ionescu if he had suggestions pertaining to how policy makers might better engage and educate the public about the benefits of such projects. Mr. Ionescu noted that community gatherings for the purpose of discussing planning concepts, such as the then present joint meeting, could be helpful. He noted that the concepts weren't new and could be observed in buildings abroad or on the East Coast. He advised Council to approach the public with a uniform vision that would be perceived as something positive for the City and not as a threat. He offered to be available to assist with this process and meet with residents in their neighborhoods. He opined that residents never lose property value due to installation of a good mixed-use development. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned the existence of a retail to housing ratio. Mr. Ionescu responded that the mix is usually town and area specific. Planning Commission Vice Chairman Teglia opined that the City would benefit from implementation of many ofMr. Ionescu's concepts. He discussed the examples of the City of Pasadena and Downtown San Mateo, including well designed mixed-use developments, closed- off pedestrian breezeways, integrated and terraced-back mixed-use parking facilities and higher density developments. He opined that the key to successful planning is good design, not numbers in a zoning code. He further suggested that the zoning and design envelope concepts suggested by Mr. Ionescu could help South San Francisco. He noted, for example, that a zoning envelope was not in place to hold the developer to expectations for the Transit Village project between BART and Costco. He expressed interest in learning more about ways to encourage consistent high quality design that supports public and private needs. Commissioner Prouty questioned how the City could encourage neighbors of the Downtown District to promote a master plan including mixed-use developments like those discussed that evenmg. Mr. Ionescu responded that the City's leaders need to create a vision for the Downtown District that would excite the majority of residents. He opined that residents would appreciate the possibility of development to support a positive economic upside for property owners. STUDY SESSION - Presentation and consideration of preliminary land use concepts for Chestnut A venue/El Camino Real Area Plan. (Approximately 50 acre area between South San Francisco BART Station and A Street near EI Camino Real). Recess: 7:48 p.m. Meeting Resumed: 7:59 p.m. Senior Planner Lappen presented the staff report and visual depictions of the subject property, including a roughly 50 acre land area in the Chestnut Avenue El Camino Real vicinity located near the geographical center of the City between the South San Francisco BART Station and the Downtown District. He noted that Kaiser and certain commercial uses made the area regionally SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 4 important, but observed that development had been hindered by oddly shaped parcels. He explained the planning context to include the General Plan, the Linear Path and Bike Park Plan, the Transit Village Plan, the Grand Boulevard Initiative and the El Camino Real Master plan, which was in draft form. He advised that staff proposed to hire a land-use consultant to help oversee the process of planning the subject property area. Senior Planner Lappen noted that Kaiser presently had a formal project under review with the Planning Commission and would be retrofitting its complex by 2030. He explained staff was encouraging Kaiser to take a comprehensive approach to growth including intensifying its uses on existing sites. Dr. Michelle Caughey, MD, Physician in Chief and Chief of Staff at Kaiser Hospital at 1200 El Camino Real, introduced her presentation as an explanation of hospital planning concepts related to Kaiser's development of its new hospital and Kaiser's request for a conditional use permit pertaining to property located at 1330 EI Camino Real. She continued her presentation as follows: South San Francisco Kaiser has been in operation since 1950 and on its current site since the 1970s. It treats 104,000 patients residing in San Mateo County yearly, 33% of which are residents of South San Francisco. Kaiser sees itself as the City's Community Hospital and is committed to remaining in South San Francisco. Dr. Caughey explained that hospital facilities are subject to very stringent industry standards imposed by the state and federal governments. Facility planning is further limited by logistic issues related to patient transfer times. Thus, the hub of a hospital is the emergency room, which needs to be on the first floor and the adjacencies, including imaging rooms, operating rooms and the critical care ICU area, are placed around it. Further, due to constant changes in medical technology and medical care delivery hospital facilities must be designed for flexible use. Additionally, ambulance and other patient traffic measures must facilitate quick, efficient and safe transfer of patients from vehicles to the hospital. Dr. Caughey then explained that by law, Kaiser must replace its hospital by 2030 and remedy certain seismic issues by 2013. She noted new hospital construction must occur without interrupting on-going medical care. In the interim, however, Kaiser must upgrade and increase the size of its intensive care unit. Accordingly, a project calling for installation of a 20 bed intensive care unit on the 5th floor of the hospital and expansion of the emergency rooms and operating rooms on the 1 st floor was before Kaiser's Board of Directors. In addition, the project called for relocation of existing offices on the 5th floor of the current building to a closely adjacent former motel facility at the 1330 EI Camino Real property on an interim basis. Accordingly, Kaiser had a pending conditional use permit requesting placement of administration and storage offices at the 1330 EI Camino Real property. She further noted that construction of the new intensive care unit was planned to begin in 2009. Dr. Caughey closed by noting that Kaiser intends to be a part of the City's dreams and SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 5 visions for the future. City Attorney Mattas advised Commissioners and Councilmembers to refrain from expressing positions with respect to the pending conditional use permit application pertaining to the 1330 El Camino Real property, because the Planning Commission could make a decision on it that could ultimately be appealed to Council. He noted that questions about the application could be entertained. Commissioner Prouty asked for clarification with respect to the construction proposed to begin in 2009. He further questioned how Kaiser planned to build a new hospital and maintain existing services on a single site and whether it envisioned acquiring a separate and/or adjacent parcel. Dr. Caughey explained that renovation of the motel facilities located on the property at 1330 El Camino Real would be the first step. Once those renovations were complete, offices from the 5th floor of the current hospital building would be moved to the 1330 El Camino Real property. She opined that construction of the ICU could not begin for at least a year because the plan would be sent to Sacramento for approval after approval by Kaiser's Board of Directors. Dr. Caughey explained that Kaiser's preferred method and the least expensive way to build the new hospital would call for construction of the facility adjacent to the existing facility. She further opined that it may be prohibitively expensive to do it in a phased manner. With respect to acquisition of additional property, Dr. Caughey explained that Kaiser was keeping its options open. Commissioner Teglia requested more detail on the proposed usage of the 1330 EI Camino Real property. He further expressed concern about the Kaiser property and the Company's approach to design generally. He opined that the parking structure on the 1200 EI Camino Real property presents a use permit violation, because he had not seen fulfillment of the condition that employees would park on the top level and leave the lower levels open for patients. He expressed further concern over the trailers parked out in the parking lot and opined they could be better integrated with a ramp and a dock yielding a seamless transition between the hospital and the trailers. He noted his future questions would call for a closer look at the balance between the City's needs and Kaiser's and would examine the issue of taking a hotel out of use to benefit a property that could be better utilized. Dr. Caughey acknowledged that the Kaiser building, which was built in 1975, is constrained. Commissioner Zemke noted the current Kaiser property at 1200 El Camino Real had a combination of medical office space and hospital use. He questioned whether Kaiser anticipated a shift to more hospital use and less medical office space. Dr. Caughey responded that the hospital is the critical need at the 1200 EI Camino Real Campus. She noted that primary care services presently located at the facility could be moved off-site, but hospital based specialists such as cardiologists, orthopedics, pulmonary critical care, radiology and pathology require the flexibility to move back and forth between provision of inpatient and outpatient services. Thus, Kaiser expected to retain the existing office building size with some slight expansion. SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 6 Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto asked for clarification as to whether the pending conditional use permit application pertaining to the 1330 El Camino Real property would ever come before Council. City Attorney Mattas advised the pending application could come before Council if Kaiser appealed the Planning Commission's decision. Chief Planner Kalkin also noted that because the pending application pertained to property located within the Transit Village Overlay Zone, it might present zoning consistency issues that may require a hearing before Council. In response to a question by Councilman Mullin, Dr. Caughey clarified that 35% of South San Francisco residents are Kaiser members. She further requested that Michael Kaye, Kaiser's Capital Projects Manager, address Councilman Mullin's question regarding Kaiser's decision to replace - as opposed to retrofit - the hospital to meet the 2030 requirements. Mr. Kaye responded that the structure of the existing building does not meet the 2030 legal requirements. Further, Kaiser's options for the new facility are dependent on an analysis of an earthquake's impact on the hospital structure's ability to meet the requirements of SB 1953. Councilman Addiego noted that Kaiser Hospital is integral to the South San Francisco Community and stated that its presence in the City has always been reassuring. He questioned the duration of the interim use and requested clarification of the storage proposed in the pending application. Mr. Kaye responded that Kaiser's sense of an interim use is until a new facility exists and/or through 2030 at the latest. Mr. Kaye further responded that the storage proposed at the 1330 El Camino Real property is ancillary to hospital use. Mayor Gonzalez questioned the cost of the new hospital and stressed the importance of green building practices. Dr. Caughey responded that preliminary cost estimates were very high and noted Kaiser is committed to green building. Commissioner Prouty observed the proposed interim use may be for a 22 year duration and questioned whether Kaiser considered building a new storage and ancillary use facility on the 1330 El Camino Real site as opposed to renovating the current motel structure. Mr. Kaye explained Kaiser determined it was advisable to expend funds to construct the new ICU rather than to construct a new administrative/storage facility that would have a short 20 year life. He further noted the current motel structure at the 1330 property suited the proposed uses, including administrative offices and storage of equipment. Chairwoman Giusti questioned whether Kaiser planned to remodel the hotel prior to moving over the proposed uses. SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 7 Mr. Kaye responded that Kaiser proposed to install modest seismic, exterior, landscaping and parking upgrades to the facility located at 1330 El Camino Real. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto stressed the importance of fitting the property at 1330 El Camino Real with the City's vision for the future. Mr. Kaye acknowledged that Kaiser would work closely with the City to develop something that would fit-in with the plans for the subject property area. Councilman Garbarino questioned whether Kaiser projected patient increases and how such projections would be incorporated into design of the new hospital. Dr. Caughey responded that Kaiser South San Francisco serves roughly 124,000 Kaiser members. She noted that patient projections were presently based upon assumptions related to the ageing of the population. She noted, however, that projections would increase if nearby local hospitals were forced to close as result of new state requirements. Vice Chairman Teglia pointed out that the 1330 EI Camino Real parcel was situated near properties ripe for redevelopment. He suggested that Kaiser consider better utilizing its current property by building up and/or accommodating its needs from a planning perspective on its existing site. He further commented that in the future, City leadership and Kaiser may consider looking at nearby properties presenting land-swap opportunities. Mayor Gonzalez thanked representatives from Kaiser Hospital and directed the discussion back to the staff report presented by Senior Planner Lappen. Vice Chairman Teglia looked forward to more expert advice on methods for planning the subject property area. He stressed the importance of hiring new consultants with a fresh outlook for this purpose. He further suggested updating the General Plan should be considered. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined the staff report highlighted the need for a cohesive vision and/or plan for the study area. Senior Planner Lappen noted that circumstances have changed since the 2003 initial draft of the El Camino Master Plan. In response, Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto echoed Vice Chairman Teglia's point regarding updating the General Plan. Commissioner Prouty noted approval of Kaiser's project could defeat the whole purpose of creating a vision or plan for the study area and expressed support for consideration of a land swap opportunity. He further stated that projects in the subject property area should not be approved until a plan for the area exists. Mayor Gonzalez stated agreement with this concept. SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 8 Vice Chairman Teglia opined that Council and the Commission received good information at the study session, but not a whole lot was accomplished. He noted that developing the study area would take commitment from the City Council and state funding. He further stressed the importance of developing a realistic plan for the area including the portions that would be used for civic improvements, sold to developers and designated for retail use. He noted the absence of such advice from the evening's study session. He questioned whether a slight relocation of the linear park was still on the table. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned visibility to plans for certain properties in the area, including the former gas station at the comer of El Camino Real and Chestnut A venue and the two Safeway stores located within City limits. Councilman Addiego opined that the conceptual discussion at the study session was beneficial; however, the session did not accomplish much by way of direction. He stressed the significance of a comprehensive plan for the area. He further suggested the ideas of joining with the School District on a site for the library and making the linear park the spine of proposed housing in the subj ect property area. Commissioner Prouty suggested mixed-use development and making the most of the opportunity to create a gateway to the City as priorities for the subject property area. Councilman Addiego opined that the part of Mission Road across the street from the Courthouse would be a good arterial for mixed-use housing. He further noted the potential for great capacity along the road. Councilman Garbarino opined that aside from certain contingencies, land swap opportunities were a nice idea. He also agreed that development of a plan for the subject property area was important. He further suggested the concept of two gateways to the City including the Downtown District and the Chestnut A venue/EI Camino Real area. Vice Chairman Teglia stressed the importance of considering the present restrictions on buildings in the Downtown District. He opined that considerations such as increased density and building height, conversion of allies into pedestrian breezeways and proper infrastructure should be integrated. He further stated a mixed-use parking structure between Grand and Baden Avenues with retail facing into the alley might be appropriate. He suggested that zoning roadblocks to such development need to be identified and lifted. Councilman Mullin suggested that the subject property area under consideration in the EI Camino Real Chestnut Avenue area presented an incredible opportunity for development in the heart of the City. He opined that as a symbol and beacon of democracy, a new library could create a cultural and learning hub in the area. He questioned the existence of restrictions on the use of redevelopment funds to support a new library. Assistant City Manager and Director of Economic & Community Development Van Duyn noted redevelopment funds could be used to purchase land that would ultimately be used [or the library. SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 9 He further advised that the General Plan already designated the subject property area for mixed- use, housing, commercial and many of the other concepts discussed during the study session. He also opined that none of the proposals were inconsistent with incorporating a recreation facility into the plan for the subject property area. He noted that much more could be done with the land than what the General Plan states and opined that the City had advanced to a point at which greater densities had become necessary. He opined that the Commission and Council were in a great position to shape the plan for the subject property area irrespective of the present General Plan. He stressed that direction on development and design plans in the area was necessary. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned whether the December 2007 RFP would encompass some of the discussion pertaining to higher densities and integration of housing and mixed-use development. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn advised that the evening's comments would be passed along and that some of the consultants vying for the work were present at the study session. He opined that mixed- use development and integrated market and moderate to low income housing plans were possible within the study area. Commissioner Prouty questioned infrastructure plans at the Chestnut Avenue, EI Camino Real and Westborough Boulevard interchange. He also thanked the Council and City staff for the hard work that went into assembling the properties in the subject property area and for the incredible opportunity it presented to develop an area that is the geographic heart of the City with the capacity to be the City's face on the Peninsula. Assistant City Manager VanDuyn opined that infrastructure in the area might need to be modified based upon development plans for the subject property area. He further clarified that he had met with owners of property on the corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut and learned that despite rumors, they had no present plans for the property. Vice Chairman Teglia questioned whether the City had the resources in place to ensure expectations for development of the study area could be met. As an example of his concerns, he recalled disappoint with the Transit Village results. He suggested that planning department staffing and internal expertise should be increased and noted that a good consultant was critical to the project. He further opined that the City's leadership should collectively evaluate the consultant's resumes and suggested field trips around town with the consultants might be more beneficial than stakeholder meetings. Mayor Gonzalez concurred that a good consultant was critical. He opined that the concepts presented by Mr. Ionescu would be beneficial to plans for the subject property area. He questioned whether staff believed it had enough direction to move forward. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn advised he was pleased with the discussion that had taken place and would take the issues raised under advisement. He advised that staff would select the consultant with Council and the Commission's concerns in mind. Mayor Gonzalez thanked the Planning Commission, City staff and members of the Community SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 10 for participating in the joint meeting. ADJOURNMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Being no further business, Chairwoman Giusti adjourned the Planning Commission Meeting at 9:50 p.m. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING Being no further business, Mayor Gonzalez adjourned the City Council Meeting at 9:50 p.m. Approved: Pedro Gonzalez, Mayor City of South San Francisco !l1 hAAA ~ M~Gi'ti, Chairwoman Planning Commission City of South San Francisco SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 30, 2008 PAGE 11 ~ 't tl s:'l.N S o () >- r;; \j g (> \~ :4lIFOp.."t< MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2008 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE 1. Call to Order (Cassette Tape No.1) 7:01 p.m. 2. Roll Call Present: Councilmembers Addiego, Garbarino and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto and Mayor Gonzalez Absent: None. 3. Public Comments None. 4. Pursuant to Resolution No. 10-2007, Board and Commission Absence Policy- Hearings and determinations on continued service of certain Board and Commission members. Mayor Gonzalez explained that consistent with the absence policy established by Resolution 10-2007, Board and Commission members with 3 or more absences in a 12 month rolling period were called before Council for a hearing. Council then heard and discussed absences as follows: Paul Herbert - Conference Center Authority - Mr. Herbert appeared and explained the reasons for his absences. After discussion, Council unanimously voted to retain Mr. Herbert. Rudy Ortiz - Conference Center Authority - Mr. Ortiz did not appear, but had previously submitted a letter to Council regarding the reasons for his absences. After discussion, Councilmen Garbarino and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tem Matsumoto and Mayor Gonzalez voted to retain Mr. Ortiz. Councilman Addiego opposed retention of Mr. Ortiz. Alicia Gonzalez.- Cultural Arts Commission - Mrs. Gonzalez did not appear. After discussion, Council unanimously voted to remove Mrs. Gonzalez. Sandra Ige - Cuhural Arts Commission - Ms. Ige did not appear but submitted a letter explaining the reasons for absences. After discussion, Council unanimously voted to retain Ms. Ige. Francisco Vieira - Historic Preservation Commission - Mr. Vieira appeared and explained the reasons for his absences. After discussion, Council unanimously decided to retain Mr. Vieira. Carolyn Reardon - Housing Authority - A letter from the Housing Authority was submitted to explain that Ms. Reardon had not missed 3 meetings. Accordingly, no hearing was required. 5. Adjournment Being no further business, Mayor Gonzalez adjourned the meeting at 7:29 p.m. Approved: Pedro Gonzalez, Mayor City of South San Frarlcisco SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 27,2007 PAGE 2 MINUTES DRAFT CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIP AL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2008 CALL TO ORDER: 7:32 pm (Cassette Tape No.1) ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmen Addiego, Garbarino and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto and Mayor Gonzalez. Absent: None. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Reynaldo Tanada, South San Francisco High School student. INVOCATION: Pastor John Cantley, Grace Covenant Church. PRESENTATIONS · Parks for the Future - presented by Zoe Kersteen- Tucker and Julia Bott. Julia Bott, the Executive Director ofthe San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Administration, presented an explanation of the Parks for the Future ballot measure initiative qualified to appear on the June 8, 2008 ballot. If passed, the initiative would generate $16,000,000.00 in new dedicated funding for parks derivative of a proposed one-eighth cent retail transactions and use tax increase. South San Francisco's proportionate share of the funds would be roughly $650,000.00/year. In order to qualify for receipt of funds and subject to certain exceptions, cities and counties would have to retain their general fund contribution for parks. Zoe Kersteen-Tucker ofCCAG stressed the importance of the initiative as an investment in the future. She stated that vibrant parks add to the value of our lives and homes. Councilman Mullin stated support for the measure and questioned the decision to put the initiative on the June 2008 ballot, a time when he opined voter turn out might not be at its peak. Ms. Bott acknowledged the voter turn-out challenge related to the June election. However, she stated that sponsors of the initiative believed that with less on the ballot, efforts to reach voters might be better received. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto expressed concern over the Governor's statement that park funding may be cut. She questioned the portion of Parks for the Future funds that would be allocated towards administrative costs. Ms. Bott responded that if the measure passed, administrative costs related to the initiative would come out of first quarter proceeds. Councilman Garbarino questioned when, if approved, the initiative would take effect. Ms. Bott advised that, at the earliest, the initiative would take effect by November 2008. Councilman Addiego noted support for the measure and parks generally, but stated he was not generally fond of sales tax increases. He further requested information about how the funds would be apportioned among San Mateo County cities and estimated that South San Francisco would likely generate roughly $900,000.00/year more in funding than it would receive yearly pursuant to the measure. Ms. Bott advised that the County Parks Commission and Board of Supervisors would determine funding allocations. She noted that many South San Francisco residents use County Parks, including San Bruno Mountain, which would benefit from the measure. . Certificate of Recognition honoring EI Camino High School Teacher Alicia Vosberg recipient of the California League of High Schools' Educator of the Year Award. Mayor Gonzalez and EI Camino High School student Priscilla Ting presented Ms. Vosberg with the Certificate of Recognition. . Certificate of Recognition honoring South San Francisco High School Teacher Ashley Gray recipient of the California Award for the American History Teacher of the Year from the Daughters of the American Revolution - presented by Mayor Gonzalez. Mayor Gonzalez and South San Francisco High School student Reynaldo Tanada presented Mr. Gray with the Certificate of Recognition. Mr. Gray commented that teaching is not a singular event, but is a team effort. He expressed gratitude for the opportunity to provide instruction within South San Francisco's diverse demographic. AGENDA REVIEW No Changes. City Manager Nagel noted that, if adopted, the ordinance changing the City Council's regular meeting time from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., specified as Item No.3 on the Agenda, would take effect before the April 9, 2008 meeting. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2008 PAGE 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Gonzalez thanked the students present from South San Francisco and El Camino High Schools for participating in the 28th Annual Youth Government Day Program. He further thanked EI Camino High School Teacher Steve Simondi and South San Francisco High School Teacher Ashley Gray for their dedication to the Program and to their students. All Councilmembers commented on the program's value and noted that it inspired excitement about the City's future. Mayor Gonzalez then requested City staff and elected officials to introduce their respective Youth Government Day counterparts. Participating students were introduced as follows: Councilman Mullin introduced his counterpart, Mia Howell of El Camino High School. Councilman Garbarino introduced his counterpart Christeen Rico of El Camino High School. Councilman Addiego introduced his counterpart, Sabrina Fong of South San Francisco High School. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto introduced her counterpart, Priscilla Ting ofEl Camino High School. Mayor Gonzalez introduced his counterpart, Reynaldo Tanada of South San Francisco High School. City Manager Nagel introduced his counterpart, Carolina Jimenez of South San Francisco High School. City Attorney Mattas introduced his counterpart, Matthew Malepeai of South San Francisco High School. Director of Finance Steele introduced his counterpart, Mia Evangelista of South San Francisco High School. Fire Captain Campagna introduced his counterpart, Margaret de Larios of South San Francisco High School. Library Director Sommer introduced her counterpart, Adelina Lara of South San Francisco. Director of Recreation and Community Services Ranals introduced her counterpart Depika Narewatt of South San Francisco High School. Director of Information Technology Hollis introduced his counterpart Loana Bonilla of South San Francisco High School Chief of Police Raffaelli introduced his counterpart Carolyn Kojima ofEI Camino High School. Director of Public Works White introduced his counterpart Justine Buenaflor of EI Camino High School. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2008 PAGE 3 City Treasurer Battaglia's counterpart Eric Cheung ofEl Camino High School introduced himself. Assistant City Manager and Director of Economic and Community Development Van Duyn introduced his counterpart Marcelo Sanchez of El Camino High School. City Clerk Martinelli-Larson introduced her counterpart Paul Landicho ofEl Camino High School. Chief Planner Kalkin's counterpart William Yale ofEl Camino High School introduced himself. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL . Announcements / Committee Reports Councilmembers announced upcoming events, programs and public improvements and reported on individual attendance at community meetings and events. Specific items for further action and/or consideration were set forth as follows: Councilman Mullin observed structural modifications to Colma Creek that were not captured in a February 22,2008 Memorandum to Council from Director of Public Works White. He requested Director White to explain the modifications. Director White advised that the County installed steel poles to keep the creek's walls from moving inward. These changes were intended to protect the street and adjacent sewer. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto requested the Fire Department to provide additional information pertaining to a Memorandum from the Fire Chief to Council, including a breakdown by neighborhood. She further suggested that a quarterly State of the City Presentation be incorporated in the regular City Council meeting schedule. Mayor Gonzalez urged business owners in the Lindenville area to attend the Lindenville Business Owners' Meetings in order to learn about upcoming Public Works projects in the regIOn. After discussion, Council also decided to schedule a special joint meeting with each of the City's Boards and Commissions. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of February 11,2008 and February 13,2008. 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of February 27,2008 in the amount of $2,675,224.40. 3. Motion to waive reading and adopt Ordinance #1393-2008 amending Section 2.04.010 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code relating to City Council meeting times and changing the regular City Council meeting time from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27,2008 PAGE 4 4. Motion to approve the City Manager's participation in the City's Retirement Health Savings Plan. 5. Resolution # 21-2008 adopting the Compensation Program for the South San Francisco Executive Management Unit. 6. Resolution # 22-2008 in support of a one-eighth cent retail transactions and use: tax for parks and recreation purposes in San Mateo County. Motion- Councilman Addiego/Second- Councilman Garbarino: to approve the Consent Calendar. Unanimously approved by voice vote. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 7. Informational Report on State Propositions 98 and 99 which are set for the June 2008 election. City Attorney Mattas recommended that Council listen to his objective report, ask questions and determine whether it wished to consider taking a formal position. He then presented an overview of competing ballot measure initiatives qualified for the June 8, 2008 ballot, Propositions 98 and 99, as follows: City Attorney Mattas advised that both Propositions 98 and 99 originated in response to the Keylo case decided by the United States Supreme Court. In Kevlo, the Court allowed a government entity to acquire a single family home via eminent domain for the purpose of promoting redevelopment in the area. Propositions 98 and 99 propose to modify state law pertaining to eminent domain and do not purport to affect rights afforded under the United States Constitution or other federal law. Proposition 98 is promoted by the Howard Jarvis Tax Payers' Association. Pursuant to the initiative, private property may be taken for a stated public use, but only when just compensation is made. Proposition 98 would amend the California Constitution to limit Redevelopment Agencies' ability to apply eminent domain to take property and reconvey it for private development use. Substantive portions of Proposition 98 would also change key terms and compensation provisions. For example, under Proposition 98, the property owner would not waive his or her right to object to the taking by withdrawing funds from the account established by the public agency. Furthermore, under existing law, a private property owner is entitled to attorneys' fees only if a court determines that the offer is unreasonable. Proposition 98 would change this, and require public agencies to pay all attorneys' fees plus the acquisition cost ifthe property is valued at more than the taking price. The Proposition would further invalidate rent control through a provision expanding the definition of a taking. However, an express provision in Proposition 98 allows rent control to remain in place as long as the rent control was established before January 2007. Proposition 98 would not affect a public entity's ability to take private property to prevent criminal activity. Proposition 99 is promoted by the League of California Cities. The initiative would amend the takings provision of the California Constitution to prohibit public agencies from acquiring single family homes, except in very limited circumstances. Accordingly, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2008 PAGE 5 Proposition 99 specifically focuses on the type of taking that was permitted by the United States Supreme Court in the Keylo case. The Proposition would thus prohibit a public agency from taking single family residence properties that had been the residence of the owner for at least 1 year. The exceptions to Proposition 99 include public health, criminal activity and remediation of land. Councilman Mullin questioned the affect of both measures passing. City Attorney Mattas advised that in those circumstances, the measure receiving the highest number of voters would prevail over conflicting provisions in the other measure. Councilman Addiego noted that although the Council had never had to use the threat of rent control, the ability to institute it was a deterrent to unreasonable rent inflation. Councilmen Mullin and Garbarino expressed inclusionary housing concerns raised by Proposition 98. After discussion, Council directed staff to prepare for its future consideration a resolution specifying the Council's support for Proposition 99 and opposition to Proposition 98. Recess: 9:09 p.m. Meeting Resumed: 9:14 p.m. 8. Resolution # 23-2008 amending the 2007-2008 Operating Budget to adjust revenues and expenditures at midyear. City Manager Nagel introduced the item as a review strategy that Council and staffhad engaged in for several years in order that budget planning might better capture current and future demands. He suggested that the City continue to look for new revenues and reduce expenditures where possible. He further addressed the community's misperception pertaining to the source of funding for recent Redevelopment Agency property purchases. He explained that these purchases were made with redevelopment funds and not with funds from the City's Operating Budget. Director of Finance Steele presented the current status of the budget as follows: Regarding revenues, he explained that although signs indicated that the economy entered a downturn, which had been worsened by the mortgage crisis, the contributing factors to those problems were not in play for the County and the City. Accordingly, he noted the stability of the City's property tax revenue, which unlike cities in other regions of the state, is not largely driven by growth and/or new home sales. He noted, however, that the downturn might affect other sources of revenue. For example, he estimated a sales tax reduction of one (1) million dollars largely based upon the loss of Ron Price Volkswagen and S & C Ford. He also noted a potential decline in construction, which generally yields 18% of the City's sales tax revenues. He further noted that Building/Planning Permit revenues and Franchise Fee revenues were respectively down .5 million and $200,000.00. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27,2008 PAGE 6 He next noted: (1) final property tax numbers would likely come in $500,000 over budget projections; (2) an ERAF refund of approximately .6 million dollars; and (3) parking tax assessment revenues of roughly .6 million. He advised that revenue estimates were conservative and could even have potential for greater upside than projected. Regarding expenditures, Director Steele highlighted the request for a $200,000 augmentation to the budget for litigation expenses, which he opined would be recouped from projected settlement recoveries. He further noted the Fire Department budget required an additional $425,000.00 due to salary survey results. Regarding reserves, Director Steele noted that the General Fund undesignated reserve was projected to end the year at 5.6 million dollars. He recommended that the retiree health benefit reserve be moved from the general fund to the benefits fund. Councilman Mullin requested the formula for determining franchise fee projections. Director Steele advised that the projected negative (-)$200,000.00 adjustment was a conservative estimate designed to bring estimated franchise revenue in-line with revenues received during the last fiscal year. He further opined that with the exception of a small percentage of the funds, the franchise fee revenues generally were not static. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned the impact of minimum staffing on the Fire Department's Budget. City Manager Nagel noted that staffwould determine the cost savings achieved vis-a.-vis minimum staffing and report back. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto requested clarification of accounting rules applicable to the retiree health benefit reserve. Director Steele advised that the reserve includes roughly four (4) million dollars that Council had already set aside to fund the forty two (42) million dollar retiree health benefit liability. He noted that the City is not mandated to fund the liability but is required to show it. He observed there is no requirement that the city keep the reserve Council authorized, although doing so is responsible. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto questioned whether the mortgage crisis and other housing market issues could impact the City Treasurer's Investment Portfolio. Director Steele advised that there were no mortgage backed securities in the portfolio. Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto opined that a summary snapshot form of the projected and/or requested increases and decreases set forth in Director Steele's presentation might be helpful to residents. Motion- Councilman Garbarino/Second- Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto: to approve Resolution # 23-2008. Unanimously approved by voice vote. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2008 PAGE 7 9. Resolution # 24-2008 authorizing execution of an Agreement with the South San Francisco Unified School District for joint use of facilities. Director of Recreation Ranals explained that the proposed Agreement with the South San Francisco Unified School District for joint use of facilities updated an agreement from 1995 and defined conditions and policies pursuant to which the two agencies could share facilities and sports fields. She noted certain benefits to the City and the School District incorporated in the Agreement, including free use of rental facilities and streamlined scheduling and permitting processes. Director Ranals opined that the Agreement wouldn't impact the Department's budget. She further noted that approval of the Agreement would signify continued cooperation among the Council and the School District pertaining to facilities use. Councilman Addiego questioned differences between the agencies' respective background check procedures, since, pursuant to the Agreement, the City would have to comply with the background check requirements set forth in the Education Code. He also questioned whether the City would take on increased maintenance responsibilities under the Agreement. Director Ranals noted that the Recreation Department finger prints all affected employees. She further responded that she would obtain additional information pertaining to the School District's background check processes. Regarding maintenance, Director Ranals advised that in practice, the City's maintenance role has expanded over the years and the Agreement reflected this. Motion- Councilman Garbarino/Second- Mayor Pro Tem Matsumoto: to approve Resolution # 24-2008. Unanimously approved by voice vote. COUNCIL COMMUNITY FORUM None. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business Mayor Gonzalez adjourned the meeting at 9:47 p.m. in honor of Victoria E. M'Cormack, Emil Rusty Hahn Jr. and Alice Uccelli Marsilli. Approved: Pedro Gonzalez, Mayor City of South San Francisco REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 27,2008 PAGE 8 Agenda Item #2 I certify that the demands set forth on this payment register are accurate and funds are available for payment. * )/7/0Z C/1iCo/& EINANcE DIRECTOR V DATED: *Note: Items below do not: include payroll related payments Checks: Date Amount 02/27/08 $ 03/05/08 1,034,665.84 864,153.90 Electronic Payments: Date Amount To Description Total Payments $ 1,898,819.74 This is to certify that the above bills were confirmed at the regular council meeting held March 12, 2008. MAYOR COUNCIL rllEMBER OF SO SAN FRANCISCO DISBURSEMENT REPORT CITY 1 PAGE WARRANT o 27~ 02 CK DATE 02/27/03 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27 /08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK 117469 117486 11 7 521 117415 117515 117515 117506 117506 117415 117362 117443 117426 117393 117467 11 73 77 117405 11 7362 117362 117438 117455 117404 117496 117496 117526 117512 117512 117493 117512 117493 11 7444 117522 117504 # INVOICE/DESCRIPTION PARKING TAX ADVANCE REFUND ALLOCATION OF PARKING PENALTIES CANCELLED PICNIC RESERVATION CORPYARD MEETING REFRESHMENT LCC PENIN DIV DINNER MTG LCC AWARDS 2/4~2/16 PENIN DIV DINNER MTG MULTICULTURAL EVENT MULTICULTURAL EVENT FOCUS ON COMMUNITY MTG CHARGES MILEA' P REIMB 06~07 STAT PKG COMPU' OFTWARE DOT P AL EXAM MISC EIMB INITI, P-ANNUAL EMP SVC CELL CHARGES CHARGES N EVIEW SVCS CHARGES 8 ER LEASE 2, EMP HIRE 2, EMP HIRE l' JRTING PLIES PHONE ABAG CELL 2/28 2/28 3/29 3/29 CELL A!10UNT 12 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57- 95 00 84 00 66 00 87 66 00 41 96 00 00 00 48 691 862 370 25 37 37 40 40 15 3 21 595 338 60 77 750 44 32 050 474 441 57 6 1 10 VENDOR NAME PARKING CO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTR TERRY, GEORGE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUNNYVALE, CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CITY OF SSF CENTENNIAL MULTICU SSF CENTENNIAL MULTICU FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF AT&T MOBILITY MARTINELLI-LARSON, KRI HDL COREN & CONE CDW GOVERNMENT INC PACIFIC OCCUPATIONAL BUENAFLOR, CECILIA A DOMINIC'S AT OYSTER PO AT&T MOBILITY AT&T MOBII,ITY KNAPP WOLLAM, ALLISON NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS DE LAGE LANDEN SERV-TEMP SERV~T~MP TRfu"<S AMERICA PUBLIC NUMBER 1305 10 10 10-09110-4330 10~09110-4390 10~10110-4410 10110-4410 10413~4201- 10520-4410 10-00000-3202 10~00000'.3301 10-00000-3530 10-01110-4310 10-01110-4310 10-01110-4310 110~4310 -01110-4310 -01110-4310 10~01110 -4410 10.02110-4310 10-06210-4201 -06210 -09110 -4504 -4201 10-10520-4820 10-11110~4210 10-11110~4210 ACCOUNT 1 10-0 10- 10 10 10 10 ACCT ACCT EXPENSE ACCT CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL COPNCIL COUNCIL TY CLERK ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING RESOURCES ECONOMIC PLANNING--DEVELOPER IJlJTLDI NG INSPECTION BUILDING INSPECTION FIRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE RESOURCES RESOURCES COMM DEV COMM DEV PROGRAl1 NAl'1E EXPENSE EXPENSE CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CI HUMAN HUMAN HUMAN ECONOMIC & & NON NON NON W/E W/E 224 ~ 1 224 ADrHN1STRATION OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES NAME PLATES-ADMIN HARDWARE SUPPLIES NAME PLATES-ADMIN CA PARKERS LABOR CODE PUBLICATION-TITLE 8&19 CARDS FOR LAPTOPS 64 37.88 7.73 48.71 72.37 3H.00 4.3.58 75 27 32 IN PLAN PLAN PLAN & CO UNION STAPLES CREDIT CREDIT SARKIS SIGNS STAPLES CREDIT SARKIS SIGNS MATTHEW BENDER THOMSON WEST SPRINT STAPLES 10-11110-4220 10-1 J 110-4301 10-11110-4301 10-11110-4302 10 -1111.0. - 4 302 10-11110-4302 10-11110-4303 10-11110-4303 10-11110-4410 FIRE ADMINISTRATIO} NISTRATION FIRE ADMTNISTRATIOt FIRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE ADMINISTRl,TION !'IRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE ADMiNISTRATION FIRE ADI-lINISTRATION FIRE ADI ALS ALS BLS BLS SUPPRESSION ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS AJ"S ALS ALS 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4330 10-11610-4410 10-11610-4410 10-11610-4410 10-11611-4201 10-11611-HI0 10-11710-4210 INC AT&T MOBILITY AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST CROSS, DOMENIC AT&T MOBILITY SPRINT SPRINT ZIRMED INC INC INC INC INC INC INC SER 202 368 259 726 480 13 23 812 200 194 143 71 180 97 14 ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION DISASTER PREPAREDNES ALS 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 SAN AIRGAS NCN LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST LIFE-ASSIST ALS A~S MATEO COUNTY HEALT INC INC INC INC 10-11210-4410 10-11310-4302 10-11610-4301 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 AT&T MOBIl,ITY ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR STAPLES CREDIT PLAN MATEO. COUNTY OF COUNTY OF INC SAN SAN MATEO 78 16 65 18 00 00 80 90 72 90 66 73 50 04 09 80 61 90 62 36 00 08 60 79 00 04 05 8 81 527 527 27 13 136 13 305 35 MEDICAL MEDICAL MEDICAL MEDICAL MEDICAL OXYGEN MORPHINE-AMB MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES PHTLS COURSE FEE EXP WIRELESS DATA CHARGES FOR LAPTOPS FOR LAPTOPS MGMT FEE DATA CHARGES SERVICE CARDS CARDS CLAIMS WIRELESS LAUNDRY REIMB 117398 117362 117504 117504 117541 117362 117355 117487 117441 117441 11 7441 117441 117441 117441 117441 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 117441 117441 117441 117441 117441 117346 CARD WIRELESS DATA CHARGES CERT SUPPLIES-DISASTER PREP OFFICE SUPPLIES SYSTEM W/ CTY SYSTEM W/ CTY RADIO TRUNK RADIO TRUNK 117535 11 7362 117465 117512 117491 117491 FIRE nRE FIRE FIRE FIRE PREVENTION lJREVEIJTION PREVENTION PREVEl'JTION PREVENTION 10-11210-4410 10-11210-4410 10-11210-4301 10-11210-4301 10-11210-4302 10-11210-4303 VERIZON WIRELESS STAPLES CREDIT PLAN STAPLES CREDIT PLAN STAPLES CREDIT PLAN NFPA SPRINT 201 388 27 13 7 314 287 48 52 73 66 16 DATA OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES HARDWARE SUPPLIES NATL FIRE ALARM CODES CARDS FOR LAPTOPS 117512 117512 117512 117456 117504 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 ?ROGRAIVl 02-27 08 ."AME ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAI>1E AHOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 2 FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT SAN so OF CITY 3 PAGE 08 02-27 CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27 /08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 II 117355 117355 11 7355 117355 117355 11 7 3 55 117355 117355 117355 117355 117355 117355 117355 117355 117355 117465 11 7 512 117402 117358 CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION LAUNDRY SERVICE LAUNDRY SVC FINANCE CHARGE SVC SVC SVC SERVICE SVC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY AI-10UNT LAUNDRY LAUNDRY SUPPLIES BATTERIES CARBIDE CHAINS-STATIONS SVC 11 7352 117473 117473 117482 117409 WATER EQUIPT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 117409 117345 117449 117362 117504 117502 MONITORIING SVC DATA CHARGES FOR LAPTOPS SHORTS FINANCE CHARGES UNIFORM-BOOTS REPAIR MONTHLY WIRELESS CARDS 05 05 07 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 29 32 16 89 29 72 81 53 ~~ '4 09 29 00 16 79 315 296 388 14 14 9 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 30 4 653 71 SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER SER VENDOR NAME AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM NUMBER 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 1(1-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4210 10-11710-4302 10-11710-4302 10-11710-4302 ACCOUNT PROGRAM tiAME SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SLJPPRESSIlJN SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESS ION SUPPRESSION SUPFRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR STAPLES CREDIT PLAN DALY CITY SAW SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION DRINKING BOAT BOAT 922 18 272 11 34 21 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPR EQUIPMEN ALL PORT PORT ROCL 10-11710-4302 10-11710-4302 10-11710-4302-1156 10-11710-4302-1156 10-11710-4340 10 1l710-4340 SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESS ION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESS lOr r.1A SER 10-11710-4340 10-11710-4360 10-11710-4390 10--11710-4410 10-11720-4110 SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION TRAINING 117512 11 7 52 5 61 HARDWARE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES COLOR COPIES-STATION 07 38 47 71 131 136 37 SPRINT SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND PLAN SOLUT CREDIT BUSINESS STAPLES TOSHIBA 10-11730-4302 10-11730-4302-1101 10-11730-4302-1101 SUPPLIES SUI?PLIES STATION SUPPLIES STATION STATION ,,1' MAINT ST ST c'", 81" ST TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC S MAINT TRAFFIC S STREET MAINTENANCE MAINT Ml\INT Ml\INT MAINT MAINT & & & & & S S oS S S 10.14510-4303 10-14510-4310 10-14510-4330 )0-14510-4390 10-14520'-4302 10-14510-4301 10-14510-4302 10-14510-4302 BUHAGIAR BUHAGIAR K-119 OF BUHAGIAR BUSINESS BUHAGIAR MSA BUHAGIAR GRANITE DOROTHY ROCK COMPANY DOROTHY DOROTHY CALIFORNIA DOROTHY 21 PUBLISHING DOROTHY 1 1 4 444 58 600 23 817 5 162 00 21 32 00 61 00 00 98 81 PETTY CASH REIMB PETTY CASH REIMB SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT PETTY CASH REIMB SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL PETTY CASH REIMB 2DAY CLASS TRAINING PETTY CASH REIMB CONCRETE 11 7 53 5 117378 117378 117433 117378 117381 117378 11 7452 117378 117421 51' & 81' M.l\IHT & GENERA:" BNGINEERING CANINE CANINE CANINE CANINE CANINE PATROL PATROL PJI.TROL TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAF?IC s 10 10 10-12722-4310 10-12722-4310 10-12722-4310 10-12722-4310 10-12721-4210 10-12721-4303 10-12722-4310 WSPCA ZIMMERMAN ALL CITY DRIVERS LICENSE 10-12640-4201 10-12720-4330 10-12720-4330 10-12720-4330 204 842 8 QI SAN GUGLIELMONI REMEDIOS CONTRACT FOR PARKING/CAR RENTAL FIVE HUNDRED VIN#IFAFP23115G166649 FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 7/1/2007 REIMB EXP DETENTION SERVICES Ul'JESTIGATION COi'l""UNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICJI.TIONS INVESTIGATION CClM~1lJNICATIONS COMMUNITY POLICE STATION STATION STATION SE 1, 651 88 25 25 25 25 25 61 10-12410-4410 10-12410-4410 10-12410-4410 10-12620-4330 10-12620-4370 LLC MATEO MEDICAL CENT CDW GOVERNNENT CONTRA COSTA CO SHERIF NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS BAROS, ELIZABETH AZZOPARDI SERVICES SUPPLIES StJPPLIES SUPPLIES .I\DMINISTF 1\1'10 14510-4210 13210-4410 EXCHANGE JEFFREY 1,400 408 26 201 1,814 747 65 446 10-12222-4370 10-12410-4301 10-11730-4302-1103 10-11730-4302-1104 10-11730-4302-1105 10-12110-4370 VERIZON WIRELESS WSPCA WSPCA WSPCA WSPCA 3/3-3/6 ADVANCE COST-REMEDIOS,M TOLL/MILEAGE EXP REIMB LESS ADV GUARD SERVICES SUBS-ID MANUAL CROSSING RENEWAL TRAINING COST ADVANCED 3/17-21 TRAVEL ADVANCE 2005 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 4/28-5/2 TUITION COMM TRNG OFFICER CELL PHONE CHARGES INC LOWE'S ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR QI EXCHANGE LLC QI EXCHANGE LLC FORD ACCT# THRU 67 03 20 66 94 30 00 75 72 65 85 00 53 68 80 31 48 00 00 00 00 00 97 22 7 29 496 20 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL CELL PHONE CHARGES 117539 11 7 539 117539 11 7 539 OPERATING SUPPLIES MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 2005 FUSION, VIN#IFAFP25175G189317 ACCT#01483 2006 FUSION VIN#3FAFP07186RI04092 ACCT#014837 FORD FORD 117475 117393 117397 117455 117367 117364 117475 117490 117423 117481 117540 117350 117408 11 7 539 117442 117465 117465 117475 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 PROG2AM NAME 02 27-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 4 FRANCISCO SAN CITY OF SO 5 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 27-08 ()2 CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK # 117420 117451 117376 117376 INVOICE/DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES A!~OUNT 17.15 120.20 208.48 138.98 159.60 VENDOR NAME GRAINGER MOSS RUBBER BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SU BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SU ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-14520-4302 10-14520-4302 10-14530-4302 10-14530-4302 NAME l"l'.INTENANCE Ml'INTENloNCE i'lWGRMl STREET STREET & CuRBS & CURBS SIDEWALKS SIDEwALKS 117465 117420 11 7 516 117378 117452 117351 117351 117516 117465 117378 117516 117465 117351 117465 SUPPLIES SIGNAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMB 2DAY CLASS TRAINING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMB SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 117351 117465 117351 117378 117452 117452 117452 117452 117452 117452 117452 117452 117452 117378 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMB 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 27/28-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 27/28-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 27/28-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS 25/26-SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL CLASS PETTY CASH REIMB 37.65 350.10 8.91 300.00 335.58 330.00 073.34 10.80 51.88 458.46 372.38 558.80 9.50 428.90 171.55 060.85 52.75 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 40.01 2 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR S GRAINGER TANKO STREETLIGHTING DOROTHY BUHAGIAR MSA 10-14540-4302 10-14550-4302 10-14560-4302 10-14560-4302 10-14550-4330 10-14570-4302 TRAFFIC MARKINGS S','REET CLEANING SICNALS SIGNALS SIGNALS LIGHTING 4 1 1 1 1 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRI INDUSTRIAL ELECTRI TANKO STREETLIGHTING S ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY TANKO STREETLIGHTING S ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRI ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRI ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRI BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY MSA ALL 10-14570-4302 10 -14570-4302 -14570-4302 10-14570-4302 10-14570-4302 10-14570-4302 10-14570-4302 10 14570-4302 10--14570-4302 10 LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING MSA DOROTHY MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA BUHAGIAR 10-14570-4302 10-14570-4302 10-14610-4301 10-14610-4330 10-14610-4330 10-14610-4330 10-14610-4330 10-14610-4330 14610-4330 14610-4330 LIGH'i'ING LIGHTING LIGHTING PARK ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMINISTRATION rNISTRATION AD~IINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMfNISTRATION ADMINISTRATION PARK ADr.l PARK PARK i'ARK P-'\-RK 10 10 10-14610-4330 10-14610-4330 10-14710-4302 PARK PARK ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMINISTRATION 3UILDING MAINTENANCE MAIN LIBRARY CHILDRE MAIN LIBRARY CHILDRE MAIN MAIN MAIN MAIN CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CHILDRE CllILDRE CHILDRE CHILDRE LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY 10-15210-4304 10-15210-4304 10-15210-4304 10-15220-4301 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4303 BOOK 1 253 32 248 12 26 653 113 251 573 MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA CIRClJLA CIRCULA LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN MAIN MAIN LIBRARY BAKER INC INC INC 255 787 73 MAIN CENTER ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN!TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI 14AIN LIBRAR'.' CIRCULA LIBRARY CIRCUJ"A 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4240 10-15110-4302 10-15110-4302 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4410 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4304 10-15210-4304 LIBRARY MAINTENANC MSB MAINTENANCE MSE MAINTENANCE ,IBRARY MAINTENANCE MAGNOLIA CITY BUILDING MAINTENfu~CE :~rT'Y HALL MAINTENANC & TAYLOR MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE RECORDED BOOKS BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS VOLKEN, MARY TORRES BOOK WHOLESALERS INC BOOK WHOLESALERS INC SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUB ROSEN PUBLISHING GROUP WHOLESALERS INC LIBRARY BAKER & TAYLOR TEAM SOFTWARE VOLKEN, MARY TORRES PENINSULA LIBRARY SYST VERIZON WIRELESS BAKER & TAYLOR INC NOLO. COM KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS PENINSULA LIBRARY SYST ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPR MAIN 10-14721-4360 10-14723-4360 10-14723 -4360 10-14732-4360 10-14742-4360 1472 BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY ART'S PENINSULA LOCKSM PENINSULA CALIFORNIA ART'S LOCKSM STATE OF PENINSULA LOCKSM HALL 10-14710-4360 10-14721-4310 ART BUHAGIAR BUHAGIAR 1 BAKER & TAYLOR 2 35 155 75 93 218 24 4 98 69 165 86 076 17 125 70 172 210 138 S DOROTHY DOROTHY 54 58 32 00 50 31 50 75 10 40 64 42 00 24 00 03 09 25 77 52 51 79 59 12 21 00 43 91 15 67 68 81 4 39 BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN MISC EXP BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS- MAIN LIB & & GRAND GRAND LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LOCK REPAIR-CITY HALL INSPECTION LOCK REPAIR-33 ARROYO PETTY CASH REIMB LOCK REPAIR-MAG SR CTR SVC-LABELLING LENDING SVC-LABELLING LENDING LABELING SERVICE FOR LIBRARY APM MAINTENANCE DRINKING WTR SUPPLY SOFTWARE LIC RENEWAL MISC EXP REIMB ONLINE COURSE REG-TOOLS/TIPS CELL PHONE CHARGES SEARCHING WEB MATERIALS MATERIALS PETTY CASH REIMB PETTY CASH REIMB 117378 117378 11 7359 117390 117359 117378 117359 117435 117435 117435 117471 117358 117518 11 7537 117471 117535 117366 117458 117366 117366 11 7366 117448 117448 117448 11 74 7 9 117371 11 7537 117374 117374 117494 117483 117374 AUDIO/VIDEO MEDIA AUDIO/VIDEO MEDIA AUDIO/VIDEO MEDIA A/V MATERIALS-MAIN LIBRARY AUDIO/VIDEO MEDIA REIMB LIB 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 PROGRAM NAME 02 27-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 6 FRANCISCO SAN SO CITY OF PAGE REPORT WARRANT DISBURSEMENT 02-27-08 CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 # CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 117483 117468 117458 117366 11 7458 117448 117388 117374 117374 117537 BOOKS A/V MAT-LSTA LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY BOOKS LIBRARY AUDIO/VIDEO MEDIA MEDIA ELF GRANT LIBRARY AUDIO/VIDEO BOOKS- MAIN GRAND BOOKS-MAIN GRAND MISC 117494 117366 117427 117461 117358 117499 117349 117465 117365 117365 117382 EXP BOOKS-MAIN LIBRARY BOOKS BOOKS-GRAND OFFICE SUPPLIES DRINKING WTR SUPPLY SNACK-HOMEWORK ASST WATER COOLER RENTAL SUPPLIES TEMP TATOOS-CHEERLEADING PROG TSHIRTS-PKWY MS BASKETBALL PROG & & REIMB GRAND PROG RAPP T-SHIRTS-ALTA LOMA PULLOVERI'IMS CHEERLEADING T-SHIRTS-PKWY BASKETBALL T-SHIRTS-WESTBOROUGH BASKETBALL MISC SUPPLIES TAPE-TERRABAY GYM MEDALS- CHEERLEADING MILEAGE EXP REIMB ANNUAL MEMEBERSHIP REC SUPPLIES EXP 117365 117365 117365 117365 ]17365 117502 117502 PROG PROG 117354 117480 117533 117476 & RAPP BASKETBALL BASKETBALL PROG BASKETBALL PROG PROG PROG PROG RENEWAL REIMB SUPPLIES- MISC TSHIRT- 43 77 25 32 26 34 60 70 42 06 66 35 11 05 71 49 00 87 17 89 23 15 62 01 47 29 67 72 53 72 00 94 32 VENDOR NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT PROGRAM NAj~E 19 71 24 25 24 532 261 141 470 14 PUBLISHING GROUP ACTION CHI LA FOR INC COM ~lIDWEST TAPE CALIFORNIA LANGUAGE BOOK WHOLESALERS WHOLESALERS TAYLOR NOLO. COM BAKER & NOLO ROSEN PARENTS 1522 -4304 15220 15225-4304 -15230-4303 15310-4303 10-15310-4303 15310-4304 15310-4304 15320-4303 10 10 10 10- 10 o CHILDREN LIBRARY CHU,DRE WEST ORANGE REFEREN OPERATIONS OPERATIONS OPERATIONS OPERATIONS MAIN LIBRARY GRAND AVE GRAND AVE SRAND P.VF GRAND AVE GRfu'iD AVENUE rljAIl' INC 10 CHILDRE 113 32 97 82 INC PUB MARY TORRES LIBRARY TAYLOR BOOK VOLKEN SCHOLASTIC INC OFFICE DEPOT ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SMART & FINAL 18 194 46 19 151 20 SPR 96 13 415 20 152 -15320-4303 15320-4303 15320-4303 10 10-15320-4303 10-15320-4303 10-15430-4301 10-15430-4302 10-15440-4380-1551 10-17110-4301 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10 10 GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE BAKER & HEINEMANN LIBRARY LEARNING CENTER LEARNING CENTER CENTER ALHAMBRA ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS C&L SPORTING GOODS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS GRAN SE ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS COMM & LEARNING RECREATION SPORTS & SPORTS & SPORTS & 17240-4302 17240-4302 17240-4302 10 10 SPORTS & ATHLETICS ATHLETICS & ATHLETICS & ATHLETICS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & SPORTS SPORTS SPORTS 386 62 25 146 39 25 AND AND CITY LUMBER CITY LUMBER AWARDS INC JAMES CLAUDIA SOUTH SOUTH ALPINE REIDY USTA QUINN 10 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17210-4302 10-17240-4310 10-17250-4210 17260-4302 10 ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS RENTALS/PICNICS CLASSES/EVENTS SPORTS & & I< & & SPORTS SPORTS SPORTS SPORTS NON NON EXPENSE ACCT NON NON NON EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE BXPENSE ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2022 12 - 00000 -2022 12-00000-2022 12-00000-2025 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER TLC ADMINISTRATORS ADMINISTRATORS POLICE ASSOCIATION SSF TLC 2 2 1 NON NON NON NON NON NON NON NON SENIOR CENTERS SENIOR CENTERS NON NON NON EXPENSE NON EXPENSE NON NON NON NON NON NON NON NON NON NON EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT EXPENSE ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE CH[LDCARE CHILDCARE ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT 10-17260-4302 10-1'1280-4210 10-17280-4390 10-17290-4302 10-17290-4410 12-00000-2005 12-00000-2005 12-00000-2011 12-00000-2011 12-00000-2012 12-00000-2013 12-00000-2014 12-00000-2015 12-00000-2016 12-00000-2017 12-00000-2018 12-00000-2019 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-.00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 12-00000-2021 1720 AT&T MOBILITY UNION BANK OF CALIFORN UNION BM,K OF CALI PORN KAISER FOUNDATION HEAL BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFOR SSF EMPLOYEES SSF AFSCME LOCAL 1569 SSF STATIONARY SSF WIDOWS & ORPHANS SSF POLICE ASSOCIATION SSF INTERNATIONAL UNITED WAY COMMUNITY HEALTH DA GRADUATION ALHAMBRA SILVA KATHLEEN PLACE CHARI THE 2 4 140 209 55 1 3 42 47 369 369 775 715 063 887 867 22 166 051 102 57 461 276 245 225 125 291 233 138 276 174 152 839 100 892 567 150 444 00 00 03 68 36 39 39 12 58 62 17 00 61 16 60 13 39 54 92 53 23 00 70 54 46 92 23 31 43 36 67 00 IES CASH ADVAN' TION CONSULTIN' RESH HOOL GRADUATIO JPPLIES COOLER RENTAL PHONE CHARGES EMPLOYEE 2/21/ PR EMPLOYER 2/21/ PR HEALTH INSUR MIUM MAR08 HEALTH INSUR MIUM CRED UNION DED 2/21 PR UNION DUES 2/21/08 UNION DUES 2/21/08 P CONTRIBUTION 2/21/08 R UNION DUES 2/21/08 P UNION DUES 2/21/08 P CONTRIBUTION 2/21/08 R CONTRIBUTION 2/21/08 R GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR GARNISHMENT 2/21/08 PR RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS MEDICAL CARE 2/21/08 PR CARE 2/21/08 2/21/08 PR DEPENDENT UNION DUES PR MAR08 PR PR R CLASSES/e:VENTS HUNZIKER JOSEPH 500 CK jj 117430 117401 117419 117349 117362 117530 117530 117434 117372 117507 117505 117510 117511 117509 117508 11 7 53 2 117395 117394 117383 117348 117384 11 7 531 117485 117478 117385 117386 117391 117417 117534 117524 11 7 524 117509 PROG 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 PROGRAM 02 2~ 08 I~Ai~ E ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK DATE PAGE 8 FRANCISCO SAN CITY OF SO PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 02-n-C8 CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/n /08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK # INVOICE/DESCRIPTION AMOUNT VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER l'ROGRAM NAME 117508 117519 117462 117356 117474 117439 2/21/08 PR 2/21/08 PR SUPPLIES UNION DUES UNION DUES MISC OFFICE ADVERTISING 07-08 GRANT 07-08 315.78 499.89 61. 67 196.88 099.95 168.50 SSF INTERNATIONAL TEAMSTER LOCAL 856 OFFICE DEPOT INC ANG NEWSPAPER PROJECT SENTINEL LA RAZA 12-00000-2025 12-00000-2027 29-10321-4301 29-10321-4303 29-10350-4393 ACCT I'IC CT CDBG HOUSING RZHABIL CDBG HOUSING REHABIL CDBG HUMAN EXPENSE EXPENSE NON NON ANNUAL FEE JAN08 COPIER LEASE CELL PHONE CHARGES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES GENERATOR OIL CHANGE/FILTER RELAYS FILTERS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES 117452 117452 117438 117375 117378 117446 117500 117437 117437 117437 117437 117527 11 7466 117413 117413 117528 117529 117460 117362 117447 117347 117513 117399 117447 11"/44"/ 117447 IN CLASS ENVIRON REVIEW SVCS-550 CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PETTY CASH REIMB CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE WET WEATH CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING SVCS MATERIALS TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/SAM MATERIALS TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/SAM H'~~ T Tn TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/SAM TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/SAM ~T~ SURVEY SVCS NS TRAILER AT SITE CE RENTAL AT 178/190 CE RENTAL AT 178/190 CSCDA SEWER REV BOND UTH 00 00 00 00 50 00 80 23 89 48 59 00 21 50 50 50 50 35 07 00 20 12 54 00 76 21 1 INC LEGAL SERVICES POINT OYSTER AIRPORT AIRPORT ADM FEE III GATEWAY PHASE SAFETY/TRAFFIC CTRL SAFETY/TRAFFIC CLASS ,"=. ~R.A~u MATERIALS ADDT'L FI~~~ 27/28 25/26 100 100 375 105 7 880 279 162 3 12 11 9 7 6 2 372 441 248 285 265 162 162 013 868 21 75 266 89 92 143 532 190 203 4 4 3 22 CENTRO MSA KNAPP WOLLAM, ALLISON BRIAN KANGAS FOULK BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY MENDOZA & ASSOCIATES SMITH-EMERY CO. KLEINFELDER INC KLEINFELDER INC KLEINFELDER KLEINFELDER UNDERWATER R URCES PACIFIC MOBI STRUCTU EXPRESS EXPRESS I RENTAL RENTAL BANK OF CALIFORN BANK OF CALIFORN OCE lMAGISTICS INC AT&T MOBILITY FENCE FENCE INC INC MSA 10350-4393 14820-4330 14820-4330 40-10414-4201 50-13231-4210-9710 51-13232-4310-0622 71-13235-4201-0352 71-13235-4201-0352 71-13235-4201-0556 71-13235-4201-0556 71-13235-4201-0560 71-13235-4201-0560 71-13235-4210-0550 71-13235-4302-0352 71-13235-4302-0556 71-13235-4302-0560 71-13910-4205 13910 13910 29 32 32 SERVICES r~AIN SEWER r:APIT SEWER CAPIT ADMINISTRATION I"lAIN PARK PJ"ANNING DEV. FUN GENERAL INFRASTRUCTI FACILITIES CAPITAL SEviER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT CAPIT P 2 2 Fo. & SEWER HU~JAN 1 WEST PARK SANITARY SANITARY SANITARY SANI SANI SANITARY SANITARY SANITARY SANITARY SANITARY TARY TARY CDBG WEST 2 UNION UNION -4205 -4250 4410 71 ADMINISTRATION Am~INISTRATION WQCP WQCF WQCP WQCP SAN 2 SERVICES PARTS INC ENGINEERING SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES MERIT SYSTEMS AIRPORT AUTO STEVEN CULLIGAN MERIT SYSTEMS SYSTEMS SYSTEMS MERIT MERIT 139 71-13931-4365 71-13932-4365 71-13932-4365 71-13941-4365 71-13941-4365 71-13941-4365 71-13941-4365 71- 7 ADMTNISTRATION TREATMENT TREATMENT PRIMARY TREATMENT FRIMA~Y TREATMENT S s PUMPING S PUMP PDt1PHK AVE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAl, PRIMARY PRIMARY MATEO INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROCESS PROCESS CONTROL PROCESS CONTROL PROCESS CONTROL INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRiAl. WASTE INDUSTRII'.L INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SLUDGE HANDLING/ E SLUDGE HANDLING/ E SLUDGE HANDLING/ E CHLORINA N CHLORINA N CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL AND CONTROL AND TREAnlEN"f PRIMARY TREATMENT SECONDARY TREATMENT SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGE SLUDGE HM"DLING/DIGE SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGE SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGE SLUDc;E HANDLING/DIGE SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGE PROCESS PROCi':SS PROCESS PIWCESS PROCESS CONTROL CONTROL WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE AND AND AND AND AND PRO AND PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO 71-13943 -4365 71-13943-4365 71-13943-4365 71-13943-4365 71-13943 -4365 71-13943-4365 71-13944-4302 71-13944-4365 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-J.3951-4302 71-13951-4302 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13941-4365 71-13941-4365 71-139<12-4365 71-13943 ~ 4365 71-13943-4365 71-13943-4365 CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI GER ILMAC INC N GATE BOLT ILMAC INC LIDATED ELECTRICA GER CHLOR ALKALI PROD MERI" SYSTEMS SERVICES VWR INTERNATIONAL INC GRAINGER VWR INTERNATIONAl, INC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE VWR INTERNATIONAL INC VWR INC VWR INC VWR INC MERIT SYSTEMS SERVICES MERIT SYSTEMS SERVICES SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS I A-I MILMAC INC INDUSTRIAL INC A-I APPLIED INTERNATIONAL HACH COMPANY ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL MILMAC & SUP 3 4 2 4 4 347 122 356 278 12 379 12 301 25 301 301 25 12 532 150 330 80 188 619 729 64 099 064 371 180 143 35 217 132 72 54 717 00 00 33 70 49 18 84 82 89 61 95 46 72 00 38 08 82 86 77 19 90 82 85 00 20 00 80 80 80 80 80 00 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER LABORATORY SUPPLIES RESIDUAL CHLORINE LABORATORY SUPPLIES LABORATORY SUPPLIES LABORATORY SUPPLIES LABORATORY SUPPLIES SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES PARTS-MAINT SHOP SHOP STOCK BALL BEARINGS SHOP STOCK WALL TIMER HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM PUMPS HARDWARE HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM PUMPS WALL TIMER WALL TIMER SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/SERVICES WATER WATER LAB WATER LABORATORY SUPPLIES HYPO ANALYZER FILTERS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS ANALYSIS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES 117344 117344 11 7 538 117538 11"1'038 117538 117424 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117447 117447 117484 117342 117357 117342 117420 117342 117418 117342 117396 117420 117464 117447 11 7 53 8 117420 11 7 53 8 117411 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 PRIMARY PROGRAM NAME 02-2,-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 10 FRANCISCO SAN so CITY 0 11 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 0)-27- CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117344 117420 117420 117497 117497 117440 117416 117355 117451 117400 117452 117517 117502 117429 117502 117392 11 7 53 5 117422 117376 117451 REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING # INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INVOICE/DESCRIPTION INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES FOR VARIOUS VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER AMOUNT WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SODIUM BISULFITE SODIUM BISULFITE LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB LATERAL REPLACEMENT GRANT REIMB SVC-STREET DEPT 2447 2447 BID BID UNIFORM SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP 2DAY CLASS 07-08 D RENEWAL-STUPI FY TRAINING LEASE CONTRACT KYOCERA SUPPLIES SEWER MATERIALS SUPPLIES DESIGN SERVICES CELL PHONE CHARGES SUPPLIES ASPHALT SUPPLIES-HOSE 301 301 301 379 301 301 43 80 80 80 20 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 49 49 44 59 00 50 01 00 00 00 32 23 75 56 87 77 36 47 60 400 299 19 640 23 150 860 VENDOR NAME ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCOUNT NUMBER 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 '71-13953-4201 71.13953-4201 '11-13 ~=d - 4:201 PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO NAME INDUSTRIl\L W"STE IND\TSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WAST;': WAST PROGRAl'] 301 301 301 301 301 301 53 53 104 903 500 3 2 2 2 ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI GRAINGER GRAINGER SIERRA CHEMICAL CO SIERRA CHEMICAL CO LEE, KEU WOO & KUM SUN 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-1.3953-4201 71--13953-4201 71-13951-4201 71--13953-4201 71-13953-4302 71-13953-4302 71-13964-4302 71-13964-4302 71-14320-4207-0760 71-14320-4207-0760 71.14320-4210 i": \\'ASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO TR1AL HlD\TSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO NlJUS PRO INDUSTRIAL PRO DECHLORINATION DECHLORINATION WASTE WASTE INDUSTRIAL SEWER ADMINISTRATION 487 2 530 110 SER CARINA AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM MOSS RUBBER CWEA-MEMBERSHIP MSA GARCIA SEWER ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION SEWER 71-14320-4302-1434 71-14320-4310 ADMINISTRATION SEWER SEvIER 346 37 70 1 TBS-MBA OF CALIFORNIA SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND HOME DEPOT/GECF SOUTH CITY LUMBER AND CALLANDER ASSOCIATES VERIZON WIRELESS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SU MOSS RUBBER 71-14320-4330 -4302 72-10610-4201 72-10610-4410 74-14430-4302 74-14430-4302 74-14430-4302 71-14320-4820 71-14321-4302 71-14321-4302 71-14321 ADMINISTRATION SEWER ADMINISTRATION DRAINAGE SEWER ADMINISTRP.'llON SEWER MAINTENANCE SEWER MAINTENANCE SEWER MAINTENANCE PARKING DISTRICT OPE PARKING DISTRICT OPE DRAINAGE DRAINAGE INFORMATION TECHNOLO INF'ORMZ\TION TECHNOLO INFORMATION TECHNOLO uTILITY PAYMENTS/REV UTILITY PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAyrmNTS /REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-1410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06]20-4410 AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T/MCI AT&T/MCI AT&T AT&T AT&T MOUNTAIN GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT INC MCAFFEE, INC PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY AT&T UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTII,ITY UTILITY 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4410 1 52 58 93 281 189 319 78 120 14 23 73 244 149 122 518 965 463 120 10 uTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY INFORMATION 'I'ECHNOLO INFORMATION TECHNOLO 75-16110-4365 75-16110-4365 75-16110-4365 75-16110-4390 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 -06120-4401 -06120-4401 -06120 06120 76 76 76 76 75-16110-4201 75-16110-4302 -4401 -4401 CDW CDW VMI SYSTEMS ARROWHEAD INC INC SPR 1 2 1 173 989 000 828 36 423 256 30 191 126 00 99 19 65 06 00 56 37 20 03 45 84 07 11 04 01 45 58 65 56 62 03 04 15 71 28 11 11 60 11 42 27 18 40 730 IT HELP W/E 1/31-WOLDEMICHAEL SUPPLIES-WATER TER PARTS TER PARTS UPGRADES FOR COUNCIL DAIS CKER SAFE CERTIFICATION-6 ERVICE RIC SERVICE ERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE LECTRIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE ERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE RIC SERVICE CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES . UW'U CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE PHONE PHONE 117472 11 74 72 11 74 72 117472 117472 117472 117472 117472 117360 117360 117363 117363 117360 117361 117360 117360 117360 117361 117361 117360 TEMP OPER MOS 117393 117393 11 7 53 6 117445 117472 117472 117472 117472 117472 117472 11 7 52 0 117358 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 INFORMATION TECHNOLO TEK 3 PROGRAM 02 27-08 NAJ'1E ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 12 FRANCISCO SAN CITY OF SO 13 PAGE DISBURSEMENT REPORT WARRANT 08 02-27 CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK # 117363 117361 117360 117361 117360 117361 117363 117389 117412 117373 117477 117378 117451 11 73 73 117477 11 73 73 117477 117498 117373 117373 117498 11 7 355 117498 117368 117501 CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES WATER SERVICE OIL COLLECTION TOW SERVICE GARAGE-AUTO REPAIR PETTY CASH REIMB SUPPLIES TOW SERVICE GARAGE-AUTO REPAIR TOW SERVICE GARAGE-AUTO REPAIR SUPPLIES TOW SERVICE SERVICE PLIES AGE UNIFORM PLIES -REPAIR WASHES ES INVOICE/DESCRIPTION PHONE SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 117403 117463 117428 1.1-/463 117495 TOW 117502 117470 WELD FLEET SUPPLIES SUPPLIES GARAGE SUPPLY-BATERRY MATERIALS-GARAGE SUPPLIES AUTO PARTS & AMOUNT 333 83 83 78 107 20 76 90 48 42 60 83 01 11 00 00 94 00 28 00 56 00 36 00 00 00 00 36 00 06 90 11 57 94 50 63 82 35 503 10 25 73 150 50 162 VENDOR NAME AT&T/Mcr AT&T AT&T AT&T ACCOUNT NUMBER 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 467 510 65 65 907 AT&T AT&T/Mcr CALIFORNIA WATER EVERGREEN INC AT&T 4 58 65 098 75 385 128 55 65 190 77 37 7 1 192 202 390 UNIFORM SER SIGNMAKERS, THE BAY AREA UPHOLSTERY SOUTH CITY CAR WASH SERVI & R & R & R SIGNMAKERS AMERIPRIDE 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4430 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-14910-4210 76-149:"0-4210 76-14910-4210 PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV p)\.Yr~ENTS/REV PAYIVIENTS/REV CITY GARAGE NAME PROGRAM UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY ;JTIL~TY 1'1''1 'J'1' 1 BOB JR TOWING RAILROAD AUTO BODY BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY MOSS RUBBER BOB JR'S TOWING INC RAILROAD AUTO BODY BOB JR'S TOWING INC RAILROAD AUTO BODY INC INC INC SIGNMAKERS, THE BOB JR'S TOWING BOB JR'S TOWING THE OIL S CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE UTILITY CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE AND INC TIRE COMPANY OLE CARBURETOR SOUTH CITY LUMBER PENINSULA BATTERY HI-TECH EMERGENCY OLE'S CARBURETOR SERRAMONTE INC FORD DAPPER S 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CIT! GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE ('ITY GARAGE -4302 -4302 -4302 -4302 -4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 MOTORCYCLE STEWART AUTOMOTIVE OLE'S CARBURETOR DAPPER TIRE COMPANY PENINSULA BATTERY INC AIRPORT AUTO PARTS INC 14910 14910 14910 14910 76-149] 0 76 76 76 76 S AIRPORT AUTO AIRGAS NCN BUHAGIAR AIRPORT DOROTHY AUTO PARTS SOUTH CITY LUMBER DOUG GRO AND SERV INC 35 33 26 21 713 143 710 287 24 PARTS INC 153 61 715 183 60 40 CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY CITY GARAGE Gl\RAGE CITY GARAGE GARl\GE GARAGE CITY CITY CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-149]0-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 J6-14910-4302 75-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 OLE'S CARBURETOR MOBILE CONCEPTS BY SCO S CARBURET APPLIED INDUST AIRGAS NCN DAPPER TIRE CO BETTS TRUCK PA BUS & EQUIPMEN STEWART AUTOMO SOUTH CITY LUM BURTON'S FIRE ~< ~ A-I RHINO LINING ~~ SERRAMONTE FORD ~nC OLE'S CARBURETOR ALOUIS AUTO RADIATOR I CALIFORNIA CLASSIC VAN AIRPORT AUTO PARTS INC DAPPER TIRE SERRAMONTE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES-SWITCH AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES HARDLINER AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES RADIATOR FLOOR MATS PARTS TIRES AUTO PARTS GARAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES GARAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 117380 117514 117502 117379 117343 117495 117463 11 7 353 117387 117347 117403 117495 117453 117463 117450 117463 117347 117346 117378 117347 MUNICIPAL OLE'S COMPANY FORD INC MAINTENANCE CARBURETOR AND '~PARATn 520 15 49 307 3 138 600 138 13 696 422 27 30 60 101 124 L 612 50 08 34 00 68 46 24 02 69 66 60 74 57 18 63 15 73 60 64 22 04 56 04 60 22 93 60 37 41 43 44 57 PARTS SUPPLIES TIRES GARAGE LAMP SUPPLY-BATERRY 117502 117407 11 7 514 117463 117403 117470 117347 LAMP SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMB GARAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CLUTCH AUTO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TIRES 117463 117357 117346 117403 117369 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 OLE PROGRAM NAME 2-2 -08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/D8SCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 14 FRANCISCO SO SAN CITY OF 15 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT o 27 0., CK DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/27/08 CK 117410 117406 117378 117454 117414 117372 117434 117372 117434 117434 117372 # INVOICE/DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMB DELIVERY GAS/DIESEL TO FIRE STATIONS OIL AMOffi\fT 14 00 00 72 57 406 30 10 2,501 453 VENDOR NAME EMSAR CALIFORNIA DON'S MOBILE GLASS BUHAGIAR, DOROTHY NELLA OIL COMPANY FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTR ACCOUNT NUMBER 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4302 76-14910-4310 76-14910-4366 76-14910-4366 NAiVJE CITY GARAGE CITY GA"AGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARI'.GF CITY GARAGE PROGRAM PREMIUM PREMIUM PREMIUM PREMIUM PREMIUM 117430 117430 117430 117488 117489 117430 117430 117457 HEALTH SUPPLIES/ENTERTAINMENT ADVANCE SUPPLIES/ENTERTAINMENT ADVANCE SUPPLIES/ENTERTAINMENT ADVANCE JAN08 FEB08 PREMIUM REDI WHEELS TRIPS SENIOR BUS PASSES SUPPLIES/ENTERTAINMENT ADVANCE SUPPLIES/ENTERTAINMENT ADVANCE INTERIOR BLDG MODIFICATIONS INSUR INSUR INSUR INSUR INSUR INSUR 59 99 84 20 25 84 00 00 00 22 88 00 00 00 HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH ~lARO 8 MAR08 MAR08 MAR08 MAR08 MAR 0 8 756 265 292 417 224 413 23 34 1 CAL1FOR KAISER FOUNDATION HEAL BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFOR KAISER FOUNDATION HEAL KAISER FOUNDATION HEAL BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFOR BLUE SHIELD OF 78-00000-2091 78-00000-2091 78-00000-2094 78-00000-2094 78-07310-4132 78-07310-4132 ACCT NON EXPENSE ACCT ACCT EXPENSE ACCT BENEFITS BENEFITS NON EXPENSE NON EXPENSE NON HE;;LTH 500 500 500 487 677 500 500 000 64 39 JOSEPH JOSEPH JOSEPH COUNTY TRANS COUNTY TRANS JOSEPH JOSEPH BUILDING HUNZIKER HUNZIKER HUNZIKER MATEO MATEO HUNZIKER HUNZIKER NIELSEN SAN SAN 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2876 81-00000-2890 AND AND EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT EXPENSE ACCT HEALTH NON NON NON NON NON NON NON NON 84 84 034,665 031,665 ~1 $1 VENDOR TOTAL 81 SYSTE GRAND TOTAL RECORDS 467 FINANCE FINANCE ADMINISTRATI ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING 10-05110-4550 10-0PI0-4301 10-06110-4303 10-06210-4201 10-06210-4201 10-06210-4201 POINT LLC BANK OF AMERICA ATR INTERNATIONAL MANPOWER INC ACCOUNTEMPS INC 2 1 130 31 366 300 834 9 265 710 200 155 658 199 ADMINISTRATI CITY MANAGER CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY C1'I' CITY CITY CITY Y TREASURER ATTORNEY COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATI CITY BANK MULLIN NON EXPENSE ACCT 10-00000-3523 10-00000-3S30 BAY AREA RECTNOS 11 00 00 95 00 00 00 00 00 66 00 06 68 00 19 00 10 16 68 00 36 02 00 84 95 20 60 00 RECEPTION DESK BLANK LASER CHKS-PAYROLL WSJ SUBSCRIPTION 2/10-ZELAYA 2/10-MOISANT 2/15-FUJITOMI TEMP TEMP TEMP HELP HELP HELP W/E W/E W/E ROCKY BANK BANK CITY CITY '1ANAGER MANAGER ATTORNEY A'i'TORNEY MANAGER MANAGER ATTORNEY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK CITY CITY OF AMERICA 1 10 10 10 10-02110-4250 10-03110-4310 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-04110-4206 10-05110-4302 10-01110-4310 10-01110-4320 10-01110-4320 10 01110-4330 10-01110-4380 10-01121-4380 MULLIN, KEVIN BANK OF AMERIC.l\ SUSTAINABLE SAN BANK OF AMERICA LLC MATEO 411 -510 20 299 85 30 05110 05110 05110-4380 10 -4310 -4 OF SMART & MEYERS OF OF ROCKY POINT CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER MEYERS NAVE, RIBACK ELLIOT PATRICIA MEYERS MEYERS MEYERS & LEAGUE CALIF CITIES REFUND LCC PARKING EXP REIMB SEMINAR REG 3/13 COUNTY & GREEN BLDG AWARDS EVENT SISTER CITY EVENT PARKING STICKERS-CITY EMP BANK BANK NAVE NAVE AMERICA _l\MERICA FINAL AMERICA NAVE NAVE 117678 117576 117627 117648 117598 117648 117648 117648 117648 117562 11 7 562 117695 117562 117562 117678 117562 117557 117644 117543 RIBACK RIBACK RIBACK RIBACK 1 1 4 35 13 3 117562 117656 117562 117701 117562 OF 1 75 95 BUILDING PERt.uT REFUND DEP MILEAGE EXP FOR REIMB 117656 FEE REFUND RESERVATION 117564 117675 NON NON EXPENSE ACCT NON ,ON "JON 150 556 518 006 704 c SMCCVB MEETING MEETING SUPPLIES RECEPTION DESK LEGAL LEGAL CITY FIN LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL EXPENSE ACCT 10-00000-3513 MUTUAL DOOR 143 REFUND AMB SVC 117578 117564 11 7 564 117564 117600 EXPENSE EXPFNSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ACCI' ACCT ACCI' ACCT CHG 10 00000-3508 10-00000-3509 10 00000-3203 SVCS BAY CALIFORNIA BAY AREA OVERHEAD DOOR AREA OVERHEAD DOOR AREA OVERHEAD DOOR BAY ET AL TAORMINA,G HOTELS INC 1 516 74 10 3 00 25 00 26 BUILDING PERMIT FEE REFUND BUILDING JAN08 FINGERPRINT FEES BUILDING PERMIT FEE REFUND SUITES PERMIT FEE REFUND 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 NON 10-00000-2132 STATE OF PROGRAM NAME 03 05-08 ACCOUPT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT FRANCISCO CITY OF SO SAN INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT SAN SO CITY OF 2 PAGE s :J 5 o CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 # CK INVOICE/DE,SCiU PTION Af'IOUNT 117644 117651 2/17-TEMP SVCS-LEADERSHIP 2/22-FUJITOMI 2/15-LEEDS 2/17-ZELAYA HIRE W/E CON 117543 117543 COACHING W/E W/E HELP TEMP 117557 117635 117660 117660 HELP W/E COPY SVC-CAFR OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 632.22 450.00 718.75 320.00 217.76 471.43 128.76 22.54 VENDOR NAME NUMBER ACCDUNT PkOGRA!^ Nl,M"~ MANPOWER INC MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH 10-06210-4201 10-06210-4201 10 06210-4201 ACCOTJKTING 1 1 1 ACCOUNTEMPS ACCOUNTING ACCOIJNTINC HELP TEMP TEMP INC ACCOUNTEMPS ATR INTERNATIONAL 10-06210-4201 10-06210-4201 10-06210'4250 10-06210-4301 ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING KSM PRINTING OFFICE DEPOT ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING 117660 117660 117545 117562 117545 117578 117668 117584 117687 117660 117603 & SCANTRONS FEE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES DRINKING WATER OFFICE SUPPLIES DRINKING WATER SVC JAN08 FINGERPRINT FEES ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS WRITTEN EXAM BOOKS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP SVC OFFICE OFFICE 117.26 229.29 28.43 134.59 28.43 420.00 176.62 728.00 838.00 55.94 23.12 INC OFFICE DEPOT INC 10-06210-4301 INC INC DEPOT DEPOT OFFICE OFFICE ALHAMBRA BANK OF AMERICA ALHAMBRA 2 11 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF PERFORMANCE BASED ERGO COUNTY OF 117562 117562 117579 117562 117628 117605 117605 117566 117590 117547 117660 117545 117603 CASSETTE TAPES ATTORNEY DUES OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERY SVC HEATER,CLOCK MEETING WEBHOSTING EMPL RECOGNITION SUBSCRIPTION, LATE LUNCH MEETING CURRENT RESIDENT MAILING LIST NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MAILING FOR GREEN FOOD OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER LUNCH W/ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP VERIO 25 GIFTS/AWARDS 310 19 561 CLARA CPS SANTA OFFICE FEDEX AREA TH 2003 FOR NOVEMBER ADVERTISING PKG ORDINANCE FEE 97 65 75 00 95 57 00 40 13 35 13 69 13 40 15 385 154 1,184 97 INC AMERICA AMERICA AMERICA S GIF BANK OF BANK OF DEPOT BANK OF BANK OF CALPELRA BANK OF JENN1FEk LASSALE 10-06210-4301 10-06210-4301 10--06210-4302 10-07110-4301 10-07110-4302 10 -03110-4201 10-09110-4210 10-09110-4230 10-09110-4240 10-09110-4301 10-09110-4301 10-09110-4301 10-09110-4310 10-09110-4320 10-09110-4330 0')110 10110 101]0 ACCOUNTING ~.CCOUNTING ACCOUNTING ACCOUlITING NON-DEPTMNTL-CITYWID NON-DEPTMNTL-CITYWID Hu~1AN RESOURCES Hur~AN RESOURCES RESOl'RCES RESOURCES RESOURCES HUMAN HU~lAN HUf'IAN HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN HUMAN HU1'IAN RESOURCES RESOURCES RESOURCES HUMAN RESOURCES -4390 -4303 o 10 kESOURCES HUMAN FIRST NATIONAL FIRST NATIONAL BLUE GRASS MAILING DAILY JOURNAL CORPORAT AMERICAN BUSINESS OFFICE DEPOT ALHAMBRA COMM -43 10-10410-4230 10-10410-4230 10-10.nO-4250 10-10410-4301 10-10410-4301 o o COMM DEV COMM DEV SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES ~ & PI,ANNING PLANNING PLANNING ECONOMIC BCONOM:C DELIVERY SERVICE 10 40 46 INC FEDEX 10-10410-4301 SERVICES PLANNING PL~.NNING PLANNING ALS l\LS I'.LS ALS ALS ALS 10-11223-4301 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 STAPLES CREDIT LIFE-ASSIST INC LIFE-ASSIST INC LIFE-ASSIST INC LIFE-ASSIST INC LIFE-ASSIST INC LIFE-ASSIST INC 27.59 726.80 979.49 13.90 156.08 906.14 13.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL SUPPLIES 11 7 548 117699 117640 117640 117640 117640 117640 117640 CODE FI FIRE PREVENTION FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 1',DMINISTRATION FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION FIRE ADMINISTRATION 10 BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING SERVICES PLM~ING SERVICES BUILDING INSPECTION BUILDING INSPECTION BUILDING BUILDING INSPECTION INSPECTION 10-1041~-4330 10-10410-4330 10-10520-4201 10-10520-4201 10-10520-4201 10-10520-4302 1054 IAMPO IAMPO CSG CONSULTANTS CSG CONSULTANTS CSG CONSULTANTS ALHAMBRA PLANNING SCrtOOL HOUSE GROCERY FIRST NATIONl\L BANK OF LIEBERT, CASSIDY WHI & PLAN FOR DRB SEMINARS 1E 11210 11110-4210 10-11110-4301 10-11110-4301 10-11110-4307 10-11210-4301 10 INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION INC INC INC 102 360 15 12,636 4,425 5,720 40 84 00 00 95 32 00 14 WEll 3/12 ERC BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING WATER SHOP REG/REFRESH CHECKING-EXPEDITE PLAN CHECKING INSPECTION SVCS FEE 117677 117690 117605 117639 117585 117585 117585 11 7 54 5 117621 117621 11 7622 117622 117575 10 10- 10-10520-4303 10-10520-4303 10-10520-4303 ENFORCEMENT PREVENTION PREVENTION PREVENTION PREVENTION 11210-4302 4302 ALHAMBRA AMERICAN SERV-TEMP STAPLES STAPLES FEDEX STAPLES CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT 10-10520-4410 10-10520-4340 10520-4303 0520-4310 ICC ICC CALBO 2 -1 2 373.83 527.68 594.84 317.53 215.00 BUILDING CODE BOOKS CREDIT MEMO BUILDING CODE BOOKS BUILDING CODE BOOKS MEMBERSHIP ANNUAL DUES RENEWAL 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 10-11210-4410 10-1 10 10-11210-4302 10-11210-4302 1210-4340 AMERICAN ROCKY ROCKY ROCKY SOUTH POINT LLC POINT LLC CITY LUMBER AND POINT LLC PLAN MESSAGING 7 143 214 10 74 64 20 60 30 70 30 50 14 54 81 81 4 76 979 27 17 79 17 37 PLAN PLAN PLAN PAGING SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 2/24-PAZ OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES BOTTLED WATER RUBBER STAMPS UNIFORM-ROSAIA,DENNIS EWASTE EVENT SUPPLIES UNIFORM-ROSAIA,DENNIS PAGING SERVICES 117548 117691 117699 117699 11 7603 11 7699 11 7 54 5 117678 117678 11 7697 117678 RIETDORF MESSAGING ERIK 150 00 SAFETY SHOE EXP REIMB PLANNING SERVICES 10-10410-4310 DINNER BOARD MEMBERS PROGRAM NAME 03 05-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT SAN WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT CITY OF SO IN"JO FRANCISCO T eE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE FRANCISCO REPORT SAN CITY OF SO 4 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT 0-'-08 o CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 # 117692 117640 117678 117667 117599 CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION EXP REIMB GASOLINE MEDICAL STAFF AMOUNT SUPPLIES DEVELOPMENT UNIFORM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 117599 11 7667 11 7 561 117561 11 7 562 117562 11 7643 117697 117678 117636 117602 117643 117663 117699 CL#05-057-02 CL#05-057 02 SAFETY CLOTHING PYMT#5 ALS PYMT# 5 SEARC! SERVICES ANSWERING SERVICE OPER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CLOTHING ALLOWANCE UNIFORM BOOTS LADDER TESTING OPER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES UNIFORM AMB AMB ALS 74 486 44 18 06 22 31 80 66 40 41 09 00 95 70 48 69 66 30 55 79 44 7 BRAD VENDOR NAME NUMBER 1 233 95 PENINSULA EMERGENCY 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4302 10-11610-4330 10-11610-4340 10-11610-4340 10-11610-1340 ACCOUNT ALS ALS NAME i?ROGRA1\1 ALS ALS ALS MA 113 243 106 183 30 128 200 6 93 113 190 10 2 1 PUBLIC PUBLIC AND CITY LUMBER POINT LLC CURTIS FAILSAFE LOWE SONS TESTING EMERGENCY PENINSULA AMERICA AMERICA AMERICA AMERICA & BANC OF BANC OF BANK OF BANK OF S S LOWE SOUTH ROCKY L N 10-11610-4340 0-11510-4801 10-11610-4810 10-11611-4201 10-11611-4302 10-11710-4302-1169 10-11710-4302-1169 10-11710-4340 10.11710-4340 10-11710-4365 10-11730-4302 10-11730-4302-1101 10-11730-4302-1101 ALS ALS BLS BLS SUPPFESDJON SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION STATION SUPPLIES STATION SUPPLIES STATION SUPPLIES ALS ALS 117663 117699 117643 117562 117697 117583 117593 117671 117635 117552 11 7711 30 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR 45 PLAN STAPLES CREDIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES OPER SUPPLIES REPLACEMENT SUPPLIES ENGRAVING CONTRACT SETTERLUND LIFE-ASSIST INC ROCKY POINT LLC UNIFORMS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MA UNIFORMS SUPPLIES OPER 55 42 99 28 66 93 00 53 32 117 43 SUPPLY IIARDl'iAR AND CREDIT PLAN AMERICA LUIvJBER TROPHIES BANK SOUTH CITY CLEARLITE ORCHARD STAPLES S OF LOWE 10-11730-4302-1101 10-11730-4302-1101 10-11730-4302-1103 10-11730-4302-1105 10-11730-4302-1105 10 -12110-1390 10-12210-4210 ST}PPLIES SUPPLIES l\DMINISTRATIO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION THRU 7/1/2007 2007-2008 FORM PRINTING SVC-DET EVALUATION COOLER RENTAL MEETING FOOD EXP 3/4 CLASS ONSITE FISCAL YEAR BACKGROUND CHK FOR 00 42 90 398 095 154 1 FLOORING S INVESTIGATIONS PRINTING ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN VELASQUEZ, BRENDA PUBLIC DIVERSIFIED PREMIER KSM 10-12230-4210 10-12310-4250 10-12410-4301 10-12410-4330 ADMINISTRAT TRAINING RECORDS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS FOLICE SERVICES 117672 117704 REIMB SVC-YOUNG,M TECH 04 12 00 00 40 101 98 120 2 SPR SAFETY TRAINING TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENG 2410-4330 12410-4365 10 10 CO~.1MUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMINISTRATION ST MAINT ST ST MAINT GENERAL, CLASSES/EVENTS MAINT & ENGINEERING ENGINEE!UNG 2NGI ERING ST MAINT & & & SEE s 1 TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC S S S 10-14510-4410 10-14510-4410 10-14610-4210 10-14610-4210 GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL ENGINEERING CANINE GENERAL ENCINEERING LIEBERT ART O?FICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ALHA14BRA 10-12722-4330 10-12722-4330 10-13210-4250 10-13210-4301 10-13210-4301 10 -13210-4301 10-13210-4302 10-14260-4302 10-14510-4330 10-14510-4330 AMERIPRIDE AT&T MOBILITY LIEBERT AMERICAN AMERIPRIDE CASSIDY & WHI CASSIDY & WHI MESSAGING S PENINSULA LOCKSM 89 32 40 43 15 15 32 32 126 1 UNIFORM UNIFORM SER SER INC INC EDEN & NEY ASSOCIATES EDEN & NEY ASSOCIATES TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUT SMART & FINAL 00 00 04 27 00 56 13 30 00 00 79 66 14 49 550 550 32 5.9 CELL UNIFORM UNIFORM KEYS-RENTAL STAFF 3/12 ERC WORKSHOP 3/12 ERC WORKSHOP PAGING SERVICES CHARGES PHONE REG/REFRESH FEE REG/REFRESH FEE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE WATER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TUITION-08 INTL K9 CONF TUITION-08 INTL K9 CONF EXCESS COPIES PER AGREEMENT SUPPLIES 117597 117597 117707 117695 117660 117660 117545 117553 117639 117639 11 7 54 8 117556 117549 117549 CANINE TRAFFIC PATROL PATROL PATROL KKH KKH PATROL PATROL PATROL P.'\TROL PATROL PATROL PATROL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS INVESTIGATION nlVESTIGATION INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATION 10-12720-4390 10-12720-4390 10-12720-4390 10-12721-4210 ALL KKH KKH 10-12720-4390 10-12720-4330 10-12410-4410 10-12410-4410 10-12620-4330 10-12620-4330 10-12620-4330 10-12620-4370 10 12620-4370 10-12720-4301 10-12720-4302 10-12720-4330 10-12720-4330 10-12720-4330 BANK OF BANK AMERICA CLEARLITE TROPHIES KENNAN, DAVID SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUB INTERNATIONAL TRAINING OF AMERICAN MESSAGING LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES KELLER CENTER EASTMAN, ELMER ROBERT CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC CA FORD CREDIT FORD CREDIT INC INC INC INC CITY MANAGEMENT SE 1 688.49 231.74 639.55 250.45 816.05 SVCS-FRITZ MED SVCS-OLYMPIA K-9 MED SVCS-DUGAN K-9 MED SVCS-JAX K-9 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 117633 117633 117633 117633 117546 AMERICA 750 233 202 83 178 60 546 43 50 48 35 403 341 51 69 00 44 00 84 38 NG SERVICES ACT FOR YEAR 2007-2008 -3/13 TRAINING TRAVEL ADVANCE 2/21 CLASS TUITION 2006 FORD EXPLORER VIN#IFMEU63E06UA69854 LEASING PAYMENTS 2007 FORD FUSION 4/21 FOR 7/1/2007 ACCT#0404 VIN# 3FAHPO THRU 92 35 77 00 00 98 MED OPER SUPPLIES AWARD/ENGRAVING 3/12-14 3/12-14 3/24-28 AIRFARE 6/30/200 117548 117638 117631 117596 117577 117610 117610 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 K-9 TRAVEL ADVANCE TUITION-FIELD TRNG OFFICER TUITION-ARMORER CLASS 117562 117583 117632 117696 117624 117562 PROGRAiVJ NANE 01 05-Llf! ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT WARRANT DISBURSEMENT SAN CITY OF SO INVOICE/DESCRIPTION FRANCISCO REPORT CK # CK DATE PAGE 5 CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCC WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 6 PAGE 03 03-0S CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 # 11 7 6 54 117657 117556 117713 117713 117616 117616 CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PARKS CELL CELL CELL AMOUNT 78 00 48 12 92 75 15 55 19 91 FOU RUBBER ARBOR DAY VENDOR NAME MOSS NATIONAL AT&T MOBILITY VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS NUMBER 10-14610-4302 10-14610-4310 10-14610-4410 10-14610-4410 10-1.4610-4410 10-14620-4302 10-14620-4302 ACCOUN'l' PROGRJ'u'1 NAME ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION AD1~INISTRATION PARK PARK PARK FARK PARK 117616 117616 117616 117653 117615 117697 117697 117697 117643 117643 117705 OPER SUPPLIES OPER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES WESTBOROUGH OPER OPER OPER 29 09 22 76 53 69 06 263 158 75 196 74 63 27 GRAND AVENUE HARDWARE GRAND AVENUE HARDWARE GRAND AVENUE HARDWARE GRAND AVENUE HARDWARE GRAND AVENUE HARDWARE MOORE TRACTOR COMPANY GRAINGER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MAINT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES-BASEBALL MIX OPER SUPPLIES/HARDWARE PARKS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARK MAINT MAINT MAINT OPER PARK 117663 117654 117694 117663 117664 117673 117615 REPAIR STEEL WESTBOROUGH SCHOOL GROUNDS BID ITEMS 4, 9 15 38 PT. GRAND LANDSCAPE 7-1-07 MEDIANS/PARKWAYS LANDSCAPE IRISH TOWN GREENS/SISTER CITY LINEAR OPER SUPPLIES/HARDWARE PT. GRAND LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES/HARDWARE OPER TREES PARK WESTBOROUGH FOR SUPPLIES MAINT POLE PARK 117643 117710 117710 117710 117710 117663 117710 10-14620-4302 10-14620-4302 10-14620-4302 10-14620-4302 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK t1AINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK PARK 7-1-07 TO 6 PARK LANDS CPA 39 TO 6-30-08 MAINTENANCE 6-30-08 TO SUPPLIES 23 7-1-07 21 20 41 89 926 21 61 51 84 92 91 76 28 41 46 06 41 80 16 28 00 00 33 00 88 00 77 AND AND AND SOUTH CITY LUMBER SOUTH CITY LUMBER SOUTH CITY LUMBER LOWE'S I,OWE ' S PARK MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PARK PARK PARK PARK MAINTENANCE 2 19 760 14 392 692 13 26 INC HARDWAR SU RUBBER PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY HARDWAR NURSERIES PRODUCTS TMT ENTERPRISES ORCHARD SUPPLY MOSS SIERRA ORCH.n.RD PACIFIC 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 lU-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 10-14620-4360 MAINTENANCE ~IAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAIUTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAnrTENANCE PARK PARK PARK PARK PARK PARK INC A METAL R PARK 773 77 523 315 8 12 2 GRAINGER CREST CREST CREST CREST ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR VALLEY CREST LOWE'S VALLEY VAI..,LEY VALLEY VALLEY 14632-4360 14633-4360 14633-4360 14633-4360 14633-4360 14633-4360 10-14633-4360 10- 10 J 0- 10 10 10 PARK SCHOOL GROUND MAINT STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS STREETS STREETS ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI ADMIN/TECHNI l>_DMIN/TECHNI ADMIN/TECHNI ADMIN/TECHNI LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY I,IBRARY 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4210 10-15110-4240 10-15110-4302 10-15110-4302 10-15110-4310 KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS KD GRAPHICS PERFORMANCE BASED ERGO PENINSULA LIBRARY SYST RANDOM HOUSE INC RANDOM HOUSE INC CALTAC 1 112 224 353 530 19 25 23 40 103 64 63 LIBRARY 10-14721-4302 10-14721-4302 10-14721-4360 10-14721-4360 10-15110-4210 10 -15110-4210 CITY HALL MAINTENANC CITY HALL MAINTENANC BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY HALL MAINTENANC CITY HALL MAINTENANC 10-14710-4410 10-14710-4210 10-14710-4330 10-14710-4340 SAN AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM CASSIDY & WHI BUILDING MAINTENANCE SER 36 STREET TREE MAINTENA COMMUNITY GARDENS/GR COMMUNITY GARDENS/GR COMMUNITY GARDENS/GR COMMUNITY GARDENS/GR COMMUNITY GARDENS/GR MAINTENA STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS AND MEDIANS 10-14633-4360 10-14633-4360 10-14633-4360 10-14633-4360 10-14633-4360 S VALLEY CREST VALLEY CREST VALLEY VALLEY CITY MECHANICAL CITY MECHANICAL AT&T MOBILITY LOWE'S ALHAMBRA LIEBERT TARANTINO ANTHONY 15 70 STREET TREE MAINTENA STREET TREE OF CREST CREST CREST INC INC 2 31 276 28 876 996 10 10-14640-4365 10-14636-4360 10-14636-4360 10-14636-4360 10-14636-4360 10-14636-4360 10-14640 COLOR 2 194 12,523 773 -4360 14640-4360 INTERSTATE ORCHARD HOUSE LOWE' HOUSE ORCHARD ORCHARD 00 33 00 00 00 67 53 61 23 41 21 31 37 39 00 35 68 23 43 19 38 30 95 00 90 60 50 36 00 50 9S 00 103 13 315 194 LABELING LABELING LABELING SVC-LIB LENDING LABELING SVC FOR LIBRARY ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS EVANCED CALENDAR MODULE AUDIO/VIDEO-MAIN AUDIO/VIDEO MATERIALS OS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 117630 117630 117630 11766S 117666 117674 117674 1175S0 MATERIALS AIR DRIER REPLACEMENT AIR COMPRESSOR IMPROVEMENTS LABELING SVC-LIB LENDING MATERIALS LABELING SVC FOR LIBRARY SVC-LIB LENDING MATERIALS SVC-LIB LENDING MATERIALS TRAFFIC MATEO LAWN OF COLOR SUPPLY HARDWAR SUPPLY HARDWAR SUPPLY HARDWAR CELL BLDG REIMB REG/REFRESH FEE MOWER 1 100 S67 51 52 6S 16 CHARGES MAINT SUPPLIES DRINKING WATER SVC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/HARDWARE TRAFFIC CONES FOR TREE SAW REPAIR UNIFORM 3/12 ERC WORKSHOP SAFETY SHOE EXP PHONE AIRPORT BLVD HOOK MEDIANS/PARKWAYS BID ITEMS 4, AIRPORT BLVD IRISH TOWN SUPPLIES GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES GREENHOUSE GREENHOUSE OPER CREW SUPPLIES RAMP, MEDIANS AND SHOULDER AREAS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 7-1-07 TO 6 15, 23, 3S, 39 HOOK RAMP, MEDIANS AND GREENS/SISTER 9 CITY LINEAR SHOULDER AREAS PARK LANDS CPA 117710 117710 117710 117710 117710 117619 117643 117619 117663 117663 117663 117625 1176S6 117549 117639 117702 117556 117643 117545 1175S2 1175S2 117630 117630 117630 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/08 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/08 03/05/0S 03/05/08 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S 03/05/0S VALLEY PROGRAM NAME 03-05-0S ,~_CCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME WARRANT CITY OF SO AMOUNT DISBURSEMENT REPORT SA.l\l FRANCISCO INVOIC8!DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 7 CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 8 PAGE 03-05-08 CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/06 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/0R 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 CK 117580 117580 11 7580 117580 11 7580 117588 11 7 54 8 117560 117560 117560 117560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7611 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 11 7560 117560 II INVOICE/DESCRIPTION 08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MISC EXP REIMB AJVIOUNT 00 00 00 00 00 43 23 23 23 23 23 47 VENDOR NAME CALTAC CALTAC CALTAC CALTAC CALTAC CUPMAN ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4310 10-15110-4410 10-15210-4303 PROGRAM NAME ADMIN/TECHNI ADMIN(TECHNI ADMIN/TECHNI ADMIN /TECHl'H AD/UN /TECHNI LIBRARY ADMIN/TECHNI ADMIN/TECHNI CIRCULA LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY MARGARET SERVICES BOOKS-MAIN LIB BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN LIB PAGING BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN 3.32 18.66 35.85 54.96 18.03 33.56 47.83 41.66 36.34 27.77 182.74 26.48 MESSAGING TAYLOR INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR AMERICAN BAKER & BAKER & & & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER BAKER 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-1521'J-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 LIBRARY LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA ~IAIN CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCTJLA CIRCULA LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN BAKER & BAKER & BOOKS-MAIN LIB BOOKS-MAIN LIB BOOKS-MAIN LIB BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN 136.65 127.26 53.50 14.94 25.56 9.82 18.92 60.44 28.02 20.45 INC INC & & TAYLOR & TAYLOR GROUP, THE & TAYLOR & TAYLOR & TAYLOR BAKER INC INC INC INC INC INC INC & TAYLOR & TAYLOR & TAYLOR BAKER BAKER GALE BAKER BAKER BAKER BAKER BAKER 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 CIRCUJ"A CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCU'"A CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY ~lAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCTJLA CIRCULA LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY r~AIN LIBRARY LIBRARY MAIN BAKER BAKER & TAYLOR MAIN MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA 117560 117560 117560 117560 BOOKS-MAIN LIB BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN 58 92 16 87 10 18 26 12 INC INC INC INC & TAYLOR & TAYLOR & TAYLOR & TAYLOR BAKER BAKER BAKER BAKER 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CHILDRE ~lAIN MAIN MAIN ~lAIN MAIN MAIN ~lAIN LIBRARY 10-15210-4304 10-15210-4304 0-15210-4304 137 MAIN LIBRARY MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA LIBRARY LIBRARY MAIN MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-152B-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4304 MAIN r'lAIN MAIN MAIN MAIN CIRCULA CIRCULl'_ CIRCULA C1RCULA LIBRARY CIRCTJLA LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY LIBRARY CHILDRE LIBRARY CIRCULA LIBRARY CHILDRE LIBRARY CHILDRE LIBRARY CHILDRE LIBRARY CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA 10-15210-4304 10-15210-4304 i~IDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE 1 149 441 CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA CIRCULA LIBRARY CIRCULA LIBRARY CIRCULl'. MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN MAIN MAIN LIBRARY MAIN MAIN MAIN LIBRARY BBC BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR 10-152~C-4301 10.-15220 -4 3 03 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4303 10-15220-4304 BOOK WHOLESALERS BOOK WHOLESALERS CUPMAN, MARGARET BOOK WHOLESALERS INC SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUB LIBRARY AUDIOBOOKS BRILLIANCE TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR TAYLOR AUDIO AMERICA INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC 1 67 248 37 54 80 376 9 22 14 263 26 15 INC INC INC INC INC INC INC INC 12 725 130 199 48 72 14 12 14 100 58 41 87 34 34 65 53 91 91 53 39 86 52 78 53 84 67 20 66 94 08 41 32 50 68 91 17 33 93 61 AUDIO/VIDEO AUDIO/VIDEO AUDIO/VIDEO AUDIO/VIDEO MISC EXP REIMB LIBRARY BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN & GRAND LIB BOOKS AUDIO/VIDEO 117571 117649 117649 117649 11 7649 117588 117568 117689 117568 117568 BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN AUDIO/VIDEO-MAIN AUDIO/VIDEO-MAIN -MAIN BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA 12 BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA MAIN LIBRARY CIRCULA 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 10-15210-4303 RZI,KER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR INC INC INC INC 14 123 13 15 29 46 65 53 BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS-MAIN 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 11 7 56 0 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117560 117565 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 PROGRl'~'VJ NAME 03 05-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 9 CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 10 PAGE 08 05 0--; CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 # 117560 117665 117560 117560 117560 CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION BOOKS-GRAND (ELF GRANT) A/V MATERIALS- ELF GRANT BOOKS AMOUNT 13 17 80 351 120 18 INC FOR CHI INC VENDOR NAME BAKER & TAYLOR PARENTS ACTION BAKER & TAYLOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-15225-4303-1522 10-15225-4304-1522 PROGRAM NAME WEST ORANGE CHILDREN WEST ORANGE CHILDREN 10-15230-4303 MAIN LIBRARY REFEREN BOOKS-GRAND BOOKS 12 91 '77 53 79 68 77 28 95 17 13 46 75 26 00 91 65 61 00 15 904 776 315 43 15 26 11 7 56 0 117560 117560 117559 117649 BOOKS BOOKS-GRAND BOOKS-GRAND 117559 117568 117689 117568 AUDIO/VIDEO-GRAND LIB AUDIO/VIDEO AUDIO/VIDEO-GRAND LIB LIBRARY BOOKS 117568 117626 11 7 560 117688 117560 117703 117659 LIB MAIN & GRAND AUDIO/VIDEO PROJ READ BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS 2'1 61 16 87 49 23 514 130 35 24 525 INC INC BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR 15310-4303 15310-4303 10 10 OPERATIONS GRAND AVE OPERATIONS GRAND AVE INC INC TAYLOR TAYl,OR & & BAKER BAKER -4303 -4303 15310 LO GRAND AVE OPERATIONS GRAND AVE OPERATIONS INC ENTERTA MIDWEST TAPE BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTA INC BOOK WHOLESALERS SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY WHOLESALERS BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR 15310 15310-4303 10-15310-4304 10-15310-4304 10-15310-4304 10-J.5320-4303 10-15320-4303 10-15320-4303 10 10 OPERATIONS AVENUE CHILDRE GRAI,D AVE OPERATIONS GRAND AVE OPERATIONS GRAND AVE OPERATIONS GR^""1\JD GRAND AVE PUB INC INC WHOLESALERS J^""1\JWAY COMPANY USA BAKER & TAYLOR INC SCHOLASTIC BAKER BOOK BOOK 10-15320-4304 10--15410-4380 10-15415-4303-1563 GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE GRAND AVENUE CHILDRE PROMO MATERIALS PROJ READ FOR PROJ READ LEARNING WHEELS -PROJ RD LEARNING WHEELS COPIER LEASE CLC OFFICE SUPPLIES STAFF FOR BOOKS BOOKS MAR 0 8 INC INC TAYLOR INC TBS-MBA OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE & 10-15415-4303-1563 10-15415-4303-1590 J.0-l5430-4251 10-15430-4301 10-15430-4302 PROJECT READ PROJECT READ GRANTS PROJECT READ GRANTS PROJECT READ GRANTS 117647 117713 117560 117568 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 117594 MEETING FROG CELL BOOKS BOOKS PROG PROG PROG PROG PROG PROG PHONE CHARGES-CLC -AFTERSCHOOL HOMEWORK -CLC AFTERSCHOOL SNACKS-CIlILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-HOMEWORK ASST SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL FEB08 FAC PROG RNT PAY INS 19_85 58.94 54 _ 77 625.45 236.60 588.85 607.97 457.52 696 .28 1,275.40 DEPOT ROOSTER 25 THE MEXICAN VERIZON WIRELESS INC TAYLOR WHOLESALERS & BAKER 1507 15430-4410 10-15440-4303 10 GRAN GRAN GRAN CENTER CENTER LEARNING LEARNI:-iG INC & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL DIVERSIFIED RISK & FINAL BOOK SMART SMART 1507 1551 10-15440-4380-1551 10-15440-4380-1551 10-15440-4380-1551 JO-15440-4380-1551 10-15440-4380-1551 10-17110-4350 10-15440-4303 10-15440-4380 CENTER CENTER CENTER CENTER CENTER GRAN CENTER RECREATION & COMM SE GRAN GRAN GRAN GRAN CENTER LEARNI:-iG LFARNING LEARNING LEARNING LEARNING T"EARNING LEARNING CHILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE -17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 MULKERRINS, MIKE SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL 500 172 35 28 38 12 00 63 94 12 12 96 SNACKS/SUPPLIES SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG 117655 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 CHILDCARE CHILDCARE CIIILDCARE CHILD CARE CHILDCARE CBILDCARE CHILDCARE CIIILDCARE AQUATIC AQUATIC AQUATIC PROGRAM AQUATIC PROGRA~i SPORTS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & ATHLETICS RENTALS/PICNICS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS REJI.L PROGRAM 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4410 10-17270-4302 STENHOUSE ARMANINO DAMOR INC MITCHELL IMAGING STUDI AMERICAN MESSAGING HOWELL, JOANNE 257.48 70.00 559.34 368.00 3.33 667.33 500.00 500.00 2",1.65 130.17 ",5.73 500.00 42.32 CASH ADVANCE 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 SMART CULL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL DEVIN LAURA SNACKS-CHILDCARE SUPPLIES CASH ADVANCE SNACKS-CHILDCARE UNIT RENTAL EASTER EGG HUNT CANDY LABOR-INSTALL PLACECARDS PAGING SERVICES REAL PROG SUPPLIES SNACKS/SUPPLIES SNACKS/SUPPLIES SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE 10 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240'-4410 10-17250-4310 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4302 10-17230-4340 10-17230-4410 10-17240-4302 PROGRAM PROGRAM RECREATION ADMINIS'c'R RECREATION ADMINISTR INAN EXP 117652 117712 117591 117652 11 7548 117620 17260-4302 VELEZ MITCHELL S 10-1 10-17210 10-17210-4410 10-17230 & FINAL KELLI CAROL IMAGING PUBLISHING ~mSSAGING SCHEDULE, BRONSTEIN MUSIC SMART & FINAL AMERICAN MESSAGING BOROVINA, MICHAEL VELEZ, CAROL 7 -4301 230-4330 -4360 JO PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL REIMB CASH ADVANCE CASH ADVANCE PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL \'IEBMEDIA ANER I CAe'\! RUNNER STUDI THE WEBMEDIA WEBMEDIA AMERICAN FERN PROG PROG PROG PROG 50 226 137 16 39 70 MESSAGING ELECTRIC & CONTRO MESSAGING PUBLISHING PUBLISHING 94 75 94 00 00 95 33 00 71 20 57 95 00 9 715 9 200 200 89 SERVICES REPAIR TENNIS COURT LIGHTS PAGING SERVICES 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP PAGING SERVICES CALENDAR LISTING FOR FUN RUN REPL HEADSET MICROPHONE FOR TERRABAY SNACKS-CHEERLEADING PROG PAGING SERVICES MILEAGE EXP REIMB STORAGE UNIT RENTAL REIMB CUSTOM FRAME-OMP STORAGE REIMB POOL POOL POOL 117700 117551 117695 117695 117695 117587 117695 REC BLDG 117714 117714 117548 117681 117572 117695 117548 117569 117712 117548 117604 117548 117714 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 RECREATION & COMM SE 10-1711,)-4410 AMERICAN PAGING PROGRAM 03 05 08 NA,'1E ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AIvjOUNT CITY OF SO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT SAN INVOICE/DESCRIPTION FRANCISCO CK # CK DATE PAGE II FRANCISCO SO SAN CITY OF 12 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 08 05 03 CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 CK # 117695 117695 117684 117548 117699 117690 117703 11 7609 11 7 54 8 117660 117642 117710 117710 117556 117710 117710 117567 117581 117623 117637 117637 117637 117662 117716 117676 117592 117697 117601 117603 117603 117618 117668 PROG PROG INVOICE/DESCRIPTION AFTERSCHOOL SNACKS-CHILDCARE,PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL TICKETS FOR SUMMER CAMP FIELD TRIP PAGING SERVICES PRINTER INK CARTRIDGES HOUSING USAGE PRESCHOOL SNACKS-CHILDCARE AMOUNT EVENT FOR HIP 2/15 COPIER CATERED LUNCH 1/15- FEB08 130 3 65 73 00 33 55 03 36 83 57 184 246 345 575 33 5 VENDOR NAME & FINAL SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS AMERICAN MESSAGING STAPLES CREDIT SMART SMART & FINAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-17280-4302 -4302 -4390 -4410 -4330 280 10-17280 10-17280 10-17290 1 10 ILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE PROGRAM NAME CI PLAN GRUCfo:RY CALIFORNIA E HUUS SCHOOL TBS-MBA OF FOOD 6- 6-30-0 TO 6- 6-3 TO TO 7-1-07 TO 7-1-07 7-1-07 FOR SENIORS PAGING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES EWING COURSE EXP REIMB WEST PARK 1 & 2 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WEST PARK 3 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 7-1-07 CELL PHONE CHARGES STONEGATE RIDGE LANDSCAP~ MAL WILLOW GARDENS T " ENCROACHMENT DE ENCROACHMENT DE EIR FOR FOR EAS LUNCHES ~ NTENANCE ~ANDSCAPE ,.lAINTENANCE P05-0159 P05-0159 P05-0159 SEAL PROJ & SPECS COMMUNITY CENTER SOFTWARE MODULES/SERVI EAST GRAND AVENUE EAST GRAND AVENUE PLANS SLURRY 494 250 250 250 FOR THE AT TERRABAY/MARTIN NEW SERVICES REPAIR FENCES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE RESOURCES/PAYROLL EVALUATIONS FOR FOR EIR FOR COPIES OF SUPPLIES CONSULTING OPER IRRIG DELIVERY DELIVERY NEW HUMAN ERGONOMIC 33 49 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 25 02 25 48 49 42 36 00 11 14 93 01 00 02 EIR EIR 5 6 1 1 260 195 449 906 32 090 013 576 000 375 052 211 874 295 656 251 980 16 844 17 20 19 5 PARTNERS MESSAGING INC VALLEY CREST VALLEY CREST BOC, LUCY CITY BAKING CO SCIENCES SERVICE AMERICAN OFFICE DEPOT LOUIE, DONALD VALLEY CREST VALLEY CREST AT&T MOBILITY 10-17290-4330 10-17290-4365 10-17290-4390 10-17290-4410 11-00000-1301 32-14820-4330 32-14820-4360 33-14830-4360 33-14830-4410 34-14840-4360 35-14850-4360 40-00000-2304 40-00000-2304 40-10414-4201 CHILDCARE SENIUR CENTERS CENTERS CENTERS CENTERS SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR ACCT MAIN MAL MAINTENA MAlNTENA WILLOW GARDENS NON RDG MAINT MAINT ACCT ACCT FUN SENIOR CENTERS NON EXPENSE 2 2 EXPBNSE EXPENSE & & 1 1 3 3 WEST WEST PARK STONEGATE PARK PARK PARK WEST WEST 10 4 1 INC LAMPHIER-GREGORY ON DEMAND REPROGRAPHIC CAP CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES IMPACT LAMPHIER-GREGORY LAMPHIER-GREGORY 40-10414-4201 40-10414-4201 40-10414-4201 51-13231-4250-0802 51-13231-4302-0308 51 3232-4201-0526 FUN FUN FUN INFRASTRUCTU DEV DEV DEV DEV NON PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING GENERAL GENERAL FACILITIES 1 000 265 & FENCL HIGH LINE CORP PERFORMANCE BASED ERGO AND WHITE RGM & S DRILLING SOUTH CITY LUMBER EWING FEDEX FEDEX DAN 51-13232-4210-0827 51-13232-4302-0826 51-13232-4302-0826 51-13232-4307-0320 51 13232-4307-0320 51-16110-4201-0240 51-16110-4240-0240 INFRASTRUCTU CAPITAL P CAPITAL P FACILITIES CAPITAL P FACILITIES CAPITAL P FACILITIES CAPITAL P FACILITIES CAPITAL P INFORMATION TECHNOLO INFORMATION TECHNOLO FACILITIES INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRII\L INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIl\L WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE vJ1'I.STE PROCESS CONTROL PROCESS CONTROL MATEO SECONDARY SECONDARY TREATMENT SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGE CHLORINATION 1NDUSTRII\L INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO SAN AND AND AND GROUNDS AND GROUNDS AND GROUNDS AVE PUMP S TREATMENT PRO PRO PRO 71-13953 -13951-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953-4201 71-13953 71-13953 71 71-13951-4201 71- -4201 -4201 4201 -4302 SOUTH CITY SOUTH CITY LUMBER UNITED SITE SERVIC BARNES DISTRIBUTIO HARRINGTON GRAINGER OLIN CHLOR ALKALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI CALI 877 301 12 705 379 301 301 301 379 379 12 2 I 3 I 656 13 726 378 917 25 70 102 172 ROADS ROADS ROADS WQCP WQCP WQCP WQCP WQCP WQCP SANITARY SANITARY NON NON NON EXPENSE SEWER CAPIT SEWER CAPIT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION LUMBER ITY OF CITY OF TY OF FRA 0, CITY CON TION INC H V BANK IPR NIFORM SER S D TORES CLARA VAL CWEA - SANTA CLARA VAL B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS AMERICAN MESSAGING STATE CHEMICAL EXPENSE EXPENSE GOLDEN CWEA ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT SANTA AND 143 16 20 4 200 22 30 30 293 47 290 276 99 935 297 980 699 616 71-00000 71-00000-3587 BURLINGAME MILLBRAE & 00 00 00 00 49 72 52 56 00 00 10 53 69 87 25 21 55 83 34 54 50 50 80 00 60 20 80 80 80 20 20 00 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING VARIOUS VARIOUS c~" VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS FOR INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES WATER SUPPLIES SWEEP-ELEC RM DOOR REPAIRS RESTROOM RENTALS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES NEW BLOWER BLDG SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE WATER WQCP WQCP WQCP PARTICIPATION REFUND WQCP PARTICIPATION REFUND CONSTRUCTION OF WET WEATHER PHASE 10% RETENTION-JMB CONSTRUCTION WEEKLY UNIFORM SVC COFFEEMAKERS-CONF RM TRAINING MTG TRAINING MTG UNIFORMS SERVICES SAFETY PAGING JANITORIAL DOOR 2/21 2/21 O&M O&M O&M O&M FOR LAB FOR LAB II-WEST AREA PRO PARTICIPATION REFUND PARTICIPATION REFUND 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117573 117650 117685 117629 11 7658 11 7549 117641 117589 11 7 58 9 117558 117548 117613 117697 117697 117709 117563 117617 117615 117661 117544 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 NON EXPENSE 71-00000-3585 SAN BRUNO 117683 PROGRAM NAlvlE 03-05-08 ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT SO FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT CITY OF SAN INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE PAGE 13 FRANCISCO DISBURSEMENT REPORT SAN SO OF CITY 14 PAGE WARRANT 05-08 CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 # CK INVOICE/DESCRIPTION AMOUNT VENDOR NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER NA!~E PROGR~'1 117544 117544 117544 117550 117693 117706 INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ADVERTISING-WATER SODIUM BISULFITE WATER WATER 379.20 205.60 245.80 141. 66 090.00 2 2 3 CALI CALI CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN 71-13953-4201 71-1395] -4201 Wi'.STE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WATER ACCUTEST NORTHERN ANG NEWSPAPER 71-1395]-4201 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO POLLUTION 117570 117717 117607 117606 1176]4 117605 117556 11 7 54 8 117670 117669 117669 117669 117669 117669 2447 LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB REPL GRANT REIMB LATERAL LATERAL REP LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB GRANT REIMB CURRENCY COUNTER FEB08-FILTER MAINT FOR OT CREW ON PHONE CHARGES STORM 1/25 FOOR CELL PAGING SERVICES GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE GAS SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE BID 475.00 500.00 150.00 500.00 752.]4 660.00 49.95 32.91 67.08 505.02 49.95 28.48 056.28 71-13953-42]0 2 2 2 2 SIERRA CHEMICAL CO JEAN CAROL TOOMEY 71-13964-4302 71-14320 207-0760 DECHLORINATION J,UMINISTRATION SEWER ELSA HANSON FITZGERALD, BRICENO 0760 0760 14320-4207 14320.4207 71 71 SEWER ADMINISTRATION SEWER ADMINISTRATION PATRICK FITZGERALD KRISTAR ENTERPRISES IN FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WONG 71-14320-4207-0760 72-10610-4302 74-13810-4210 74-14430-4330 ADMINISTRATION PARKING DISTRICT OPE STORM WATER ADMINIST SEWER INFORMATION TECHNOLO UTILITY PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/PEV PAYt~ENTS /REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMBNTS/REV PAYt.1ENTS /REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV MAINTENANCE 85 AT&T MOBILITY MESSAGING AMERICAN PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY 74-14430-4410 75-16110-4410 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 DRAINAGE DRAINAGE UTILITY UTILITY 2 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 UTILITY 117554 117555 117555 117555 117645 GAS SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE SVC/MODEM CABLE INTERNET PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES 02 92 20 32 37 84 64 685 33 56 135 326 887 167 ASTOUND BROADBAND AT&T 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 7G-OG120-4410 UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY AT&T UTILITY 117555 117555 117556 117548 117679 117643 117682 LD PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES CELL PHONE CHARGES PAGING SERVICES REPAIRS GARAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 37.81 13 .80 32.96 46.07 642.24 30.17 090.15 2 1 1 AT&T MATRIX AT&T AT&T MOBILITY AMERICAN MESSAGING AUTO CLINIC S RUTLAND TOOL & AT&T ROSS LOWE 05120-4410 76-06120 76-06120-4410 76-14710-4410 76-14710-4410 76-14910-4210 76 -4410 -4302 -4302 14910 14910 75 76 t~AINTENANCE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE UTILITY BUILDING BUILDING ,TTY UTILITY UTILITY UTI 03-05-08 PROGRAM NAt1E I'>CCOUNT NUMBER --_._~--- _u CITY GARAGE 76-14910-4330 SELF-INSURANCE 77-07410-4351 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 61-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 8]-00000-2308 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2876 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2880 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2880 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2890 458 RE-:::ORDS CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT PAGE 15 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE ----------- ------ - - ---- - - ----------- ------- LIEBERT, CASSIDY & WHI 15.00 3/12 ERC WORKSHOP REG/REFRESH FEE 117639 03/05/08 TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMEN 7,315.42 MAR08 W/C CLAIMS ADMIN SVC 117708 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 81.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 2,052.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 12,051.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BAY AREA OVERHEAD DOOR 0.50 BUILDING PERMIT FEE REFUND 117564 03/05/08 GOLDEN 1'lEST TRAVEL INC 1,000.00 BUS SERVICE FOR SENIORS THUNDER VLY TRIP 11 7614 03/05/08 B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS 152.46 TSHIRTS-SSF CIVIC BALLET PARTICIANTS 117558 03/05/08 B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS 41.30 T-SHIRTS FOR CHEERLEADING PROG 117558 03/05/08 ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM INC 3,295.00 FREIGHT SHIPMENT OF 4 CARGO CONTAINERS 117542 03/05/08 VENDOR TOTAL $864,153.90 GRAND TOTAL $864,153.90 SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT OF CITY 10 PAGE 08 05 0, CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 CK # 117560 117665 117560 INVOICE/DESCRIPTION BOOKS-GRAND (ELF GRANT) A/V MATERIALS- ELF GRANT BOOKS AMOUNT 13 17 80 12 91 351 120 18 15 26 INC FOR CHI INC INC INC VENDOR NAME TAYLOR ACTION TAYLOR BAKER & PARENTS ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-15225-4303-1522 10-15225-4304-1522 10-15230-4303 NAME WEST ORANGE CHILDREN WEST ORANGE CHILDREN PROGRAM BAKER & BAKER & BAKER & MAIN LIBRARY REFEREN 117560 117560 GRAND BOOKS BOOKS 117560 11'/560 117560 117559 117649 11 7 559 117568 117689 117568 117568 117626 117560 117688 117560 117703 117659 117647 BOOKS-GRAND AUDIO/VIDEO-GRAND LIB AUDIO/VIDEO AUDIO/VIDEO-GRAND LIB LIBRARY BOOKS BOOKS-MAIN BOOKS GRAND LIB & MATERIALS FOR FOR PROJ READ LEARNING WHEELS BOOKS-PROJ RD LEARNING WHEELS MAR08 COPIER LEASE CLC OFFICE SUPPLIES STAFF MEETING BOOKS BOOKS-GRAND PROMO PROJ READ AUDIO/VIDEO PROJ READ BOOKS BOOKS 77 53 79 68 77 28 95 17 13 46 75 26 00 91 65 61 00 27 61 16 87 49 23 514 130 35 24 525 TAYLOR TAYLOR 15310-4303 10-15310-4303 10 OPERATIONS OPERATIONS GRAND AVE GRAND AVE INC INC INC BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR BAKER & TAYLOR 0-15310-4303 10-15310-4303 15310-4303 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTA MIDWEST TAPE & TAYLOR ENTERTA INC PUB WHOLESALERS BAKER BOOK 10-15310-4304 10-15310-4304 10-15310-4304 10-15320-4303 10-15320-4303 10-15320-4303 10 AVE OPERATIONS AVE OPERATION~; OPERATIONS GRA1\TD AVE GRAND GRAND OPERATIONS OPERATIONS GRAND AVE OPERATIONS CHILDRE GRAND AVE AVENUE GRAND AVE GRkl\lD GRAND AVENUE GRAND AVENUE GRAND AVENUE SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY BOOK WHOLESALERS CHILDRE CHILDRE 15 904 776 315 43 INC INC INC INC OF CALIFORNIA DEPOT ROOSTER WHOLESALERS COMPANY USA TAYLOR INC SCHOLASTIC INC TAYLOR & BOOK Jkl\lWAY BAKER BAKER TBS-MBA & 10-15320-4304 10-15410-4380 10-15415-4303-1563 10-15415-4303-1563 10-15415-4303-1590 10-15430-4251 10-15430-4301 10-15430-4302 CHILDRE READ GRANTS CENTER PROJECT PROJECT READ GRANTS PROJECT READ GRANTS PROJECT REI\D LEARNING LEARNING 117713 117560 117568 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 117594 PHONE CHARGES-CLC BOOKS-AFTERSCHOOL HOMEWORK BOOKS-CLC AFTERSCHOOL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-HOMEWORK ASST SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL SNACKS-CHILDCARE/REAL FAC RNT PROG CELL PROG PROG PROG PROG PROG PROG PROG PAY INS FEB08 19.85 58.94 154.77 625.45 236.60 588.85 607.97 457.52 696.28 275.40 OFFICE MEXICAN CENTER 25 THE VERIZON WIRELESS INC TAYLOR WHOLESALERS FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL & BAKER 10-15430-4410 10-15440-4303-1507 10-15440-4303-1507 10-15440-4380-1551 LEARNING CENTER LEARNING CENTER LEAENl:'lG CENTER GRAN 1 INC & DIVERSIFIED RISK & & & & & BOOK SMART SMART SMART SMART SMART SMART -15440-4380-1551 -4380-1551 1551 1551 1551 10 10-15440 10-15440-4380- 10-15440-4380 10-15440-4380 10-17110-4350 CENTER GRAN GRAN GRAN CENTER CENTER CENTER GRAN CENTER GRAN CENTER GRAN CENTER GRAN RECREATION & COMM SE LEARNING LEARNING LEARNING LEARNING LEARNING T"EARNING LEARNING CHILDCARE CHILD CARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE 10-17280--4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL 172 35 28 38 12 63 94 12 12 96 SNACKS/SUPPLIES SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE SNACKS-CHILDCARE PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL PROG 117655 117695 117695 117695 117695 117695 CHII~DCARE CHILDCARE CIiILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE ARMANINO SMART & SPORTS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & ATHLETICS SPORTS & ATHLETICS RENTALS/PICNICS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS CLASSES/EVENTS REl'.L PROGRAM CHILDCARE 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4410 10-17270-4302 10-17280-4302 HOWELL STENHOUSE DAMOR MITCHELL AMERICAN INC 48 00 34 00 33 33 00 00 65 17 73 00 32 559 368 CHILDCARE CIlILDCARE DEVIN JOANNE IMAGING STUDI MESSAGING 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 lC-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 10-17280-4302 MULKERRINS SMART CULL I NA..1\J SMART SMART 500 42 3 667 500 500 25.1 130 55 500 & RECREATION ADMINISTR RECREATION ADMINISTR PROGRAM PROGRAM PROGRAM PROGRAM & FINAL & & CASH ADVANCE C 117591 117652 117548 117620 117700 117551 117695 117695 117695 117587 117695 LAURA FINAL FINAL FINAL KELLI JO AQUAT AQUATIC AQUATIC AQUAT SPORTS ATHLETICS IC IC MIKE 00 CASH ADVANCE PRESCHOOL AFTERSCHOOL 10-17230-4340 10-17230-4410 10 17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240-4302 10-17240--4410 10-17250-4310 10-17260-4302 10-17260-4302 10-17210-4360 10-17210-4410 10-17230-4301 10-17230-4330 PROG PROG PROG PROG VELEZ MITCHELL MESSAGING CTRIC & CONTRO MESSAGING PUBLISHING PUBLISHING PUBLISHING rfl,ESSAGING RUNNER'S SCHEDULE, BRONSTEIN MUSIC SMART & FINAL AMERICAN MESSAGING BOROVINA, MICHAEL CAROL VELEZ AMERIC^N CAROL IMAGING STUDI THE 70 257 50 226 137 16 39 70 9 715 9 200 200 89 94 75 94 00 00 95 33 00 71 20 57 95 00 CUSTOM SERVICES REPAIR TENNIS COURT LIGHTS PAGING SERVICES 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP 2 YR BUSINESS LISTING FOR OMP P.ZI.GING SERVICES CALENDAR LISTING FOR FUN REPL HEADSET MICROPHONE SNACKS-CHEERLEADING PROG PAGING SERVICES MILEAGE EXP REIMB STORAGE REIMB FRAME-OMP STORAGE UNIT RENTAL RUN BLDG UNIT RENTAL REC FOR TERRABAY POOL POOL POOL 117712 117714 11 7 54 8 117681 117572 117695 117548 117569 117712 117652 117548 117604 11 7 54 8 117714 117714 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 RECREATION & COMM SF 10-1711,)-4410 PAGING PROGRAM 03 05-08 NA14E ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AJVIOUNT CITY OF SO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT SAN INVOICE/DESCRIPTION FRANCISCO CK # CK DATE PAGE 11 ANCISCO FR SO SAN CITY OF 12 PAGE WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT 03-05-08 CK DATE 03/05/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/05/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/05/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/05/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/05/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/0S/08 03/05/08 03/0S/08 CK 11769S 11769S 117684 11 7 S4 8 117699 117690 117703 117609 11 7 S4 8 117660 117642 117710 117710 117SS6 117710 117710 117567 117S81 11 7623 117637 117637 117637 117662 117716 117676 117S92 117697 117601 117603 117603 117618 117668 SNACKS-CHILDCARE TICKETS FOR SUMMER PAGING SERVICES PRINTER INK CARTRIDGES LUNCH FOR HIP HOUSING 1/1S-2/1S COPIER USAGE FEB08 CATERED LUNCHES PAGING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES EWING COURSE EXP WEST # PROG PROG INVOICE/DESCRIPTION AFTERSCHOOL PRESCHOOL,AFTERSCHOOL CAMP FIELD TRIP PRESCHOOL SNACKS-CHILDCARE AMOUNT EVENT REIMB LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 7-1 CHARGES STONEGATE RIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WILLOW GARDENS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ENCROACHMENT DEPOSIT REFUND ENCROACHMENT DEPOSIT REFUND EIR FOR 494 FORBES P06-002S EIR FOR 2S0 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2S0 EAST GRAND AVENUE TO 6- 6-30-0 7-1-07 -07 FOR SENIORS 2 & 1 PARK PARK PHONE TO 7-1-07 TO 6- 1-07 TO 6-3 POS-01S9 POS-01S9 POS-OlS9 SEAL PROJ COMMUNITY CENTER SOFTWARE MODULES/SERVI 7 3 WEST CELL EAST GRAND AVENUE PLANS SPECS SLURRY & 2S0 OF FOR THE AT TERRABAY/MARTIN NEW SERVICES S7S 33 130 6S 73 00 33 SS 03 36 83 33 49 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 2S 02 25 48 49 42 36 00 11 14 93 01 00 02 844 17 20 000 265 5 VENDOR NAME & FINAL FINAL SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS AMERICAN MESSAGING STAPLES & SMART SMART ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-17280-4302 10-1"/280-4302 10-17280-4390 10-17280-4410 10-17290-4330 ILDCARE CHILDCARE CHILDCARE PROGRAM NAME c 57 184 246 345 CREDIT SCHOOL HOUSE GROCERY CALIFORNIA PLAN 3 260 195 449 5 6 906 32 090 013 576 000 375 052 PARTNERS MESSAGING DEPOT INC DONALD 1 1 10 TBS-MBA SERVICE OF AMERICAN OFFICE LOUIE, VALLEY INC J ~~"~.,CES 10-17290-4330 10-17290-436S 10-17290-4390 10-17290-4410 11-00000-1301 32-14820-4330 32-14820-4360 33-14830-4360 33-14830-4410 34-14840-4360 35-148S0-4360 40-00000-2304 40-00000-2304 40-10414-4201 40-10414-4201 40-10414-4201 CHILDCARE SENIOR CENTERS SENIOR CENTERS FOOD SENIOR CENTERS SENIOR CENTERS NON EXPENSE ACCT PARK 1 & 2 MAIN WEST PARK WEST PARK WEST PARK & 2 MAn: MAINTENA MAINTENA SENIOR CENTERS 1 3 3 WEST STONEGATE RDG MAINT WILLOW GARDENS MAINT NON EXPENSE ACCT NON EXPENSE ACCT FUN FUN DEV DE'! DEV PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING FOR EIR 211 874 295 656 251 4 1 1 LAMPHIER-GREGORY LAMPHIER-GREGORY ON DEMAND REPROGRAPHIC CAP CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES 40-10414-4201 51-13231-4250-0802 51-13231-4302-0308 51-13232 4201-0526 FUN PLANNING DEV. FUN GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU GENERAL INFRASTRUCTU FACILITIES CAPITAL P WHITE 980 16 19 5 & FENCL AND FEDEX FEDEX HIGH LINE CORP PERFORMANCE BASED ERGO SOUTH CITY LUMBER EWING & S DRILLING RGM DAN 51-13232-4210-0827 51-13232-4302-0826 SI-13232-4302-0826 51-13232-4307-0320 SI-13232-4307-0320 51-16110-4201-0240 51-16110-4240-0240 CAPITAL I' Fl,CILITIES FACILITIES FACILITIES FACILITIES FACILITIES INFORMATION TECHNOLO INFORMATION TECHNOLO I' I' I' I' CAPITAL CAPITAL CAPITAL CAPITAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAl, INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE WASTE VJASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO PRO 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13951~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953~4201 71~13953 ..1201 71~13953~4201 ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CIIL ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI CALI 1 2 877 301 12 205 379 301 301 301 379 379 12 INDUSTRIAl" INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO PROCESS SAN MATEO PUMP S SECONDARY TREATMENT SECONDARY TREATMENT SLUDGE HANDLING/DIGB CHLORINATION CONTROL AND GROUNDS AND GROUNDS AND GROUNDS WQCP \'iQCP WQCP WQCP WQCP SAN PROCESS ROADS ROADS ROADS ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION NON EXPENSE ITARY SEWER CAPIT SANITARY SEWER CAPIT WQCP ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE ACCT WASTE PRO CONTROL AND AND \TON NON EXPENSE ACCT ACCT 71~00000~3587 7l~00000~3588 71~00000~3589 71~13235~4210~0560 71~13235~4210~0560 71~13910~4210 71~13910~4302 7l~13910~4330 71~13910~4330 71~13910~4390 7l~13910~4410 TY OF FRA 0, CITY & CON TION INC H V BANK IPR NIFORM SER S D TORES CLARA VAL CWEA - SANTA CLARA VAL B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS AMERICAN MESSAGING CHEMICAL CWEA SAN BURLINGAME MILLBRAE AVE 71-13922~4360 71~13922~4360 71~13922~4360 71-13931-4220 71~13942~4365 71~13942-4365 71~13913~4365 7l~13944-4302 71~13951~4201 ACCUTEST GOLDEN SOUTH CITY LUMBER SOUTH CITY LUMBER UNITED SITE SERVICES BARNES DISTRIBUTION HARRINGTON GRAINGER OLIN CHLOR ALKALI STATE SANTA NORTHERN CALI AND AND CITY OF CITY OF CALI PROD CALI I 20 4 200 22 143 16 3 1 656 13 726 378 917 25 70 102 172 00 00 00 00 49 72 52 56 00 00 10 53 69 87 25 21 55 83 34 54 50 50 80 00 60 20 80 80 80 20 20 00 935 297 980 699 616 290 276 99 30 30 293 47 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING REPORTING FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS REPORTING FOR VARIOUS INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES INDUSTRIES 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 117544 11 7 54 4 117544 WATER TRUCTION OF RETENTION~JMB LY UNIFORM SVC EEMAKERS~CONF TRAINING MTG 2/21 TRAINING MTG SAFETY UNIFORMS PAGING SERVICES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DOOR SWEEP-ELEC RM DOOR REPAIRS RESTROOM RENTALS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES NEW BLOWER BLDG SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE WATER WATER WATER 2/21 WQCP O&M WQCP O&M WQCP O&M WQCP O&M FOR LAB FOR LAB RM PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION 117544 117613 117697 117697 117709 117563 117617 117615 117661 117544 REFUND PARTICIPATION REFUND PARTICIPATION REFUND WET WEATHER PHASE CONSTRUCTION II~WEST AREA PRO 117573 117650 117685 117629 117658 11 7 549 117641 117589 117589 11 7 558 117548 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 NON EXPENSE ACCT 71~00000~3585 SAN BRUNO REFUND 117683 PROGRAM 03~05~08 NA~JE ACCOUNT NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK PAGE DATE 13 CITY WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT FRANCISCO SAN so OF 14 PAGE OS-08 CK DATE 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 03/05/08 CK 117544 117544 117544 117550 117693 117'706 # INVOICE/DESCRIPTION REPORTING FOR VARIOUS INDUSTRIES REPORTING FOR VARIOUS INDUSTRIES REPORTING FOR VARIOUS INDUSTRIES ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS WATER WATER AMOUNT 20 60 80 66 00 379 205 245 141 090 VENDOR NAME ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ACCOUNT NUMBER 71-13953 -4201 '71-13953 -4201 71-13953-4201 PROGRA^l NAr~E WJI_STE PRO INDUSTRIAL 2 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO WATER 2 ACCUTEST NORTHERN CALI ANG NEWSPAPER WASTE PRO INDUSTRIAl POLLUTION 2447 LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB LATERAL BID ADVERTISING-WATER SODIUM BISULFITE 1175'70 117717 11760'7 11 '7606 117634 117605 117556 11 '7548 117670 117669 117669 117669 117669 117669 GAS ELECTRIC 117554 117555 117555 117555 INTERNET PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES CABLE 00 00 00 00 34 00 95 91 08 02 95 48 28 02 92 20 32 37 STORM GRANT LATERAL REPL GRANT REIMB CURRENCY COUNTER FEB08-FILTER MAINT FOOR FOR OT CREW ON 1/25 CELL PHONE CHARGES PAGING SERVICES GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE GAS SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SVC/MODEM REIMB REP 3 2 2 2 2 475 500 150 500 752 660 49 32 67 505 49 28 056 685 33 2 SIERRA CHEMICAL CO CAROL JEAN ELSA TOOMEY 71-13953-4230 14320-4207-0'760 71-13964-4302 7 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRO DECHLORINATION ADj~INISTRATION SEWER 85 PATRICK FITZGERALD KRISTAR ENTERPRISES IN FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF AMERICAN PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY PG&E COMPANY MESSAGING AT&T MOBILITY HANSON FITZGERALD BRICENO WONG 14320-4207-0760 14320 420'7 0'760 60 71-14320-4207-0 72-10610-4302 '74-13810-4210 '74-14430-4330 74-14430-4410 75-16110-4410 76-06120-4401 '76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 76-06120-4401 71 71 NJ~lINISTRATION SEloJER AD~IINISTRATION SEWER ADMINISTRATION PARKING DISTRICT OPE STORM WATER ADMINIST DRAINAGE DRAINAGE 56 135 326 ASTOUND BROADBAND 06120-4410 06120-4410 06120-4410 76- 76 INFORMATION TECHNOLO PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/EEV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMBNTS/REV UTILITY UTILITY UT ILlTY UTILITY SEWER UTILITY UTILITY UTILITY AT&T AT&T UTILITY 76 7G-06120-4410 UTILITY 117645 117555 117555 117556 117548 117679 117643 117682 PHONE CHARGES LD PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES PHONE CHARGES CELL PHONE CHARGES PAGING SERVICES REPAIRS 887.84 167.64 81 80 96 07 24 37 13 32 46 642 2 AT&T MATRIX AT&T MOBILITY AMERICAN MESSAGING AUTO CLINIC AT&T AT&T o 76-06120-4410 76-06120-4410 76-14710-4410 14710-4410 0-4210 -4302 -4302 76-06120-44 REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV PAYMENTS/REV MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE CITY GARAGE PAYt.1ENTS UTIlJITY UTILITY UTILITY BUILDING lTTTLTTY GARAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 17 090.15 30 1 ROSS LOWE'S RUTLAND TOOL & 76- 76-149 76-14910 76-14910 CITY GARAGE CITY GARAGE BUILDING 03-05-08 PROGRAM NAME I'.CCOUNT NUMBER ----~----~--- -----.. ------- CITY GARAGE 76-14910-4330 SRLF- INSURANCE 77-07410-4351 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 61-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2131 NON EXPENSE ACCT 8]-00000-2308 i'ION EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2876 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2880 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2880 NON EXPENSE ACCT 81-00000-2890 458 RECORDS CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO WARRANT DISBURSEMENT REPORT PAGE 15 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE/DESCRIPTION CK # CK DATE ----------- ------ ------------------- - - -- ------- LIEBERT, CASSIDY & WHI 15.00 3/12 ERC WORKSHOP REG/REFRESH FEE 11 7639 03/05/08 TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMEN 7,315.42 MAR08 W/C CLAIMS ADMIN SVC 117708 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 81.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 2,0'02.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BURLINGAME, CITY OF 12,0'0,1.00 BID ASSESSMENT PASS THRU 117574 03/05/08 BAY AREA OVERHEAD DOOR 0.50 BUILDING PERMIT FEE REFUND 117564 03/05/08 GOLDEN WEST TP~VEL INC 1,000.00 BUS SERVICE FOR SENIORS THlillDER VLY TRIP 117614 03/05/08 B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS 152.46 TSHIRTS-SSF CIVIC BALLET PARTICIANTS 117558 03/05/08 B&B CUSTOM DESIGNS 41.30 T-SHIRTS FOR CHEERLEADING PROG 11 7558 03/05/08 ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM INC 3,295.00 FREIGHT SHIPMENT OF 4 CARGO CONTAINERS 117542 03/05/08 VENDOR TOTAL $864,153.90 GRAND TOTAL $864,153.90 - ~'tu. S:1N ~ ~ . ~\i.\ (0 0 >< >-< I;:l n v 0 C' ~~ 4lIFO-p..~> S taff R~ort AGENDA ITEM#3 DATE: March 12,2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sharon Ranals, Director of Recreation and Community Services SUBJECT: MOTION TO APPROVE LOAN ART PIECE AT ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK SCULPTURE GARDEN RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, approve one sculpture, Puzzle People by Celeste Welch, for the Loan Art Program at the Orange Park Sculpture Garden, as recommended by tbe Cultural Arts Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Loan Art Program was approved by the City Council in February of2003. The goal ofthe Cultural Arts Commission in recommending the program was to stretch limited funds available for the purchase of public mi by "renting" pieces for a limited time. The city completed one cycle of loan art in 2003, with two (2) pieces displayed in the Sculpture Garden, Ponder and Circumfusion. That cycle resulted in the donation of Ponder to the city; Circumfusion was sold to a private party. A second cycle of competition resulted in the installation of Unraveling Collagen in 2005 at the west end of the garden near the bocce comis. That piece was subsequently vandalized, and removed by the artist. Plans are underway to install Centennial Cascade, which the Public Works staff constructed from recycled materials, at that location. A third cycle of Loan Art call for entries was held in 2007. In an effort to update the program image, staff advertised it as the Temporary Outdoor Exhibit Program. A total of forty-six (46) sculpture pieces were submitted by twenty (20) artists. These were reviewed by the Loan Art sub- committee, comprised of Commissioners Ron Burgess, Joy-AIm Wendler, and Sandy Ige. The sub- committee felt that although many of the entries were very interesting, only a few were appropriate for the program for one reason or another. The sub-conmlittee recommended one piece of sculpture for the Sculpture Garden, Puzzle People by Celeste Welch of Shingle Springs, California. The recommendation was approved by the full Commission at their February meeting, and is being forwarded to the City Council for approval as required by the conditions of the Loan Att Program. A photo of the sculpture, and a copy of the Loan AIi Agreement, are attached. Staff Report Subject: Recommendation for Loan Art at Sculpture Garden March 12, 2008 Page 2 The artist provided the following information about Puzzle People: . Approximately 500 pounds; · Surface is glazed ceramic, glass, stone and epoxy; core is made of metal studs and plywood; . Dimensions are 5' wide x 2' deep x 5' high (includes l' base height); . Valued at $10,000; piece is for sale. Staffhas reviewed the piece recommended for installation, spoken with the artist about how the piece is constructed with regard to possible safety issues, and to ensure that she understands her obligations under this program. Staff has discussed installation and safety concerns with the Public Works Department. Staff feels the sculpture does not present a hazard to the public, or present any installation or maintenance issues that would cause us not to support the Commission's recommendation. The sculpture sub-committee recommends placement of Puzzle People on pad #3, between Safe Haven and Ponder. Staff will work with the sub-committee and the artist to place the piece attractively. The proposed installation would be to construct a pedestal 2' wide, 5' long, and l' high; the sculpture is bolted to a metal base plate, which will be mounted to the cement pad. The terms of the loan arrangement are defined in the attached Loan Art Agreement. Specific items of note are listed below. 1. The length of exhibit recommended by the Commission is two (2) years. However, there is flexibility to define a shorter or longer exhibit period. 2. Display requirements for the piece are on a concrete pedestal. The city will work with the artist's recommendations to prepare the site. Given the design of the Sculpture Garden with the viewing "pads" already constructed, the cost of site preparation using in-house crews should be minimal. 3. The artist is responsible for delivelY of the piece to the site, and mounting the piece to the base in conformance with the city's specification. 4. The artist is responsible for maintenance of the sculpture, including removal of graffiti, and repair of damage or vandalism. The city would maintain the site, as it currently does for the Sculpture Garden. 5. Property insurance may be provided by the artist, if desired. The city is not responsible for reimbursement to the artist for damage or theft of the sculpture. It is anticipated that liability for injury associated with the sculpture would be determined on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances. The city assumes some liability as a result of exhibiting any sculpture in a public place, whether it is on loan or purchased by the city. Staff believes due care has been Staff Report Subject: Recommendation for Loan Art at Sculpture Garden March 12, 2008 Page 3 taken of public safety considerations in recommending the piece for display. 6. At the end of the loan period, the artist must reclaim the piece unless an agreement is renewed. In the event an artist offers to donate a piece rather than reclaim it, the city has the option of accepting or not accepting the donation. 7. The compensation to the artist is $1500. It should be noted that the artist bears the full cost of submitting the application, constructing the piece, delivering it to the site, traveling to the site for installation, removing the sculpture at the conclusion of the loan term, and providing property insurance if desired for the length of the display. It is possible that an additional recOlmnendation for loan art could be forthcoming from this pool of submittals. FUNDING: There are sufficient funds in the Commission's Art Fund to cover the costs of the $1,500 cash award to the artist and the installation ofthe sculpture. Installation will be done in-house, with minimal costs to be absorbed in the operating budget. CONCLUSION: If approved as recommended by the Cultural Arts Commission, Puzzle People by Celeste Welch will be exhibited for two years "on loan" in the Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden. By: ?kartH t ~J~ Sharon Ranals Director of Recreation and Community Services APProv~~ 'C~ ~ . Nage "-- City Manager Attachments: 1. Puzzle People by Celeste Welch 2. Loan Art Program Agreement City of South San Francisco Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden Loan Art Program Agreement This Agreement, made and entered into on 200_, by and between the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY"), 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California, and of (hereinafter "ARTIS T"). 1. PURPOSE ARTIST agrees to temporarily loan to CITY, and CITY agrees to grant ARTIST, a temporary exhibition permit to display ARTIST'S sculpture entitled (hereinafter "SCULPTURE") at a public location, the Sculpture Garden in Orange Memorial Park, South San Francisco, California (hereinafter "SCULPTURE GARDEN"). 2. EXHIBITION SITE The said referenced exhibition site is specifically area # , located at in the SCULPTURE GARDEN. 3. TERM The exhibition dates shall be from 200_ through ARTIST shall remove SCULPTURE on or before exact date for removal shall be arranged between CITY and ARTIST. 200 . 200 . The 4. BASE SCULPTURE shall be installed on a base (hereinafter "BASE") agreed to and designed by ARTIST and CITY. BASE will be constructed and installed by CITY. 5. PREPARATION OF SITE Installation will not be performed until the preparation and construction of any BASE required from CITY is complete. CITY is responsible for preparing SCULPTURE site according to the instructions supplied by ARTIST and agreed to by CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event CITY is unable to construct or is delayed in the construction of BASE or preparation of SCULPTURE site due to budgetary constraints, inadequate available staffing, natural disaster or any other cause, ARTIST shall not have any right to bring action or make any claim against CITY as a result of such inability or delay. 6. INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL CITY shall coordinate the installation and removal of SCULPTURE and shall assist ARTIST or ARTIST'S representative with instalJlation, with a minimal workforce, to the degree that the site is a safe and workable environment. ARTIST will be responsible for the delivery of SCULPTURE to the site, and for the on-site installation, and shall be responsible for 1 SCULPTURE on site during the installation. ARTIST will be responsible for, and cover all expenses concerning the delivery and installation of SCULPTURE to the site. 7. IDENTIFICATION PLAQUE CITY shall provide and install an identification plaque at the site of SCULPTURE to identify title, artist's name, year of creation, and construction material. Design of the plaque shall be at the full discretion of CITY. 8. MAINTENANCE ARTIST shall maintain the SCULPTURE at ARTIST'S sole cost and expense. CITY shall maintain SCULPTURE site, but will not provide reimbursement for ARTIST'S maintenance costs. In the event of defacing of or damage to SCULPTURE, whether by vandalism or act of God, ARTIST shall make such repairs as are necessary within 72 hours of receiving notice from CITY of damage, or in the event repairs carillot be completed within that time, provide CITY a written plan and timetable for the repairs within that time. Ifthe nature of the damage renders SCULPTURE hazardous to the public and SCULPTURE is determined not safe to remain in said location, SCULPTURE must be repaired to a condition not considered hazardous to the public within a 12 - 24 hour time window after ARTIST receives notification from CITY or SCULPTURE shall be removed from exhibition by ARTIST or by CITY at expense of ARTIST. Failure to comply with this section shall be deemed grounds for tennination of this Agreement. 9. COMPENSATION Compensation to ARTIST for being chosen to exhibit SCULPTURE within the City of South San Francisco shall be provided by the City of South San Francisco. ARTIST will receive $1,500 in cash as well as exposure in a brochure publicizing the public art of South San Francisco. ARTIST will also receive exposure by having SCULPTURE exhibited in the prominent and publicly accessible SCULPTURE GARDEN. 10. NOTICE OF TERMINATION ARTIST acknowledges that permission to exhibit the aforesaid SCULPTURE may be revoked at any time by CITY, and ARTIST further acknowledges that said SCULPTURE may be removed. If ARTIST does not reclaim the aforesaid SCULPTURE within (30) days of Notice of Termination, CITY or any of its agents, servants, officers or employees may dispose of said SCULPTURE as they see fit. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, it is further agreed that a written request to reclaim the aforesaid SCULPTURE executed by CITY and mailed to ARTIST by United States registered or certified mail, or other form of mail which offers proof of mailing and postage prepaid shall constitute "Notice of Termination". 11. INSURANCE If desired, ARTIST shall provide property insurance on the artwork at ARTIST'S sole cost and expense. CITY will not provide reimbursement for property insurance. 2 12. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY PROVISION ARTIST shall defend, save, keep and hold harmless CITY, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all damages, costs or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be asserted because of injury to property or bodily or personal injury (including death) occasioned by any willful negligent act or omissions of ARTIST or any of ARTIST'S agents, employees and volunteers. CITY will not be held liable for any accident, theft, vandalism, or damage to SCULPTURE from any and all causes. 13. APPLICABLE LAWS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced pursuant to California law. Any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in San Mateo County, California. Should any legal action be brought by a party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and other such costs as may be affixed by the Court. 14. AMENDMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of parties and may only be amended by written Agreement signed by both parties. 15. NOTICE Unless otherwise provided herein, an notices required hereunder shall be given by United States registered or certified mail, or other form of mail which offers proof of mailing, postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the address below: Ifto CITY: City of South San Francisco City Manager P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 If to ARTIST: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date written above. 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO City Manager Artist Print Name 4 - ~'t\l s~ ~ ~ . ~.~ (0 n ~ ~) u 0 ~l'E#~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 4 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 12,2008 Honorable Mayor and City Council Terry White, Director of Public Works ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR THE USE OF PROPOSITION IB FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving plans for the use of Proposition IB funds for fiscal year 2007-2008 in the amount of $1,007,000. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In November 2006, voters in California passed Proposition IE. This measure authorizes the state of California to sell approximately twenty billion dollars of general obligation bonds that would be utilized for transportation projects aimed at relieving congestion, improving air quality, and enhancing the safety and security of transportation systems. On June 13,2007, the City of South San Francisco adopted a resolution supporting a one billion dollar state allocation of Proposition IB funds to cities for fiscal year 2007-2008. The City's share of the Proposition lB funds for fiscal year 2007-2008 is one million seven thousand dollars ($1,007,000). Shares of the funds are calculated based upon the number of registered vehicles, the number of miles of road within the City, and population. Acceptance of these funds will help enhance our overall street maintenance program for the 2007-2008 fiscal year. In order for the City to receive the funds, Council must approve a plan for the use of the amount of funds available and complete an application to be submitted to the State Controller's office identifying the qualified improvements. After a visual survey and evaluation of the City's Pavement Management Program, staff determined which streets need major repairs. This effort is consistent with the City's policy to repair arterial and collector streets network. Listed below are the streets which comprise the plan. A combination of maintenance strategies are listed. They are; grinding and overlay, cape seal (rock and oil combination coating), and slurry seal (sand and oil combination coating). Staff Report Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR THE USE OF PROPOSITION IB FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 Page 2 of2 Item Street Name Limits Estimated No. Beginning End Cost 1 Linden Avenue Grand Avenue Baden Avenue $ 27,439 2 Linden Avenue Miller Avenue Grand Avenue $ 28,552 3 So. Linden Avenue Victory Avenue Dollar Avenue $ 110,863 4 So. Linden Avenue Dollar Avenue San Mateo Avenue $ 43,924 5 Baden Avenue Spruce Avenue Maple Avenue $ 93,874 6 Baden Avenue Maple Avenue Linden Avenue $ 58,834 7 Spruce Avenue Grand Avenue Railroad Avenue $ 60,376 8 Spruce Avenue Railroad Avenue North Canal Street $ 64,503 9 Maple Avenue Lux Avenue Grand Avenue $ 40,129 10 Maple Avenue Grand Avenue Railroad Avenue $ 48,074 11 Airport Boulevard Miller Avenue Grand Avenue $ 27,390 12 Airport Boulevard Grand Avenue Baden Avenue $ 44,920 13 Airport Boulevard Baden Avenue Underpass $ 83,714 14 Hillside Boulevard Westerly City Limits Sister Cities Boulevard $ 364,867 15 Littlefield Avenue Utah Avenue East Grand Avenue $ 374,870 Estimated Total $ 1,472,329 FUNDING Once the application is submitted to the State Controller, acceptance ofthe Proposition IB funds shall add $1,007,000 to the FY 2007-2008 budget. CONCLUSION The proposed resolution will enable the City to receive the necessary funds in a timely manner and enable City staff to begin preparation of plans and specifications for the projects. . ~1 i. >.~/~ By:..~......_./ ------.,., l\...._/{....----'A~~ Terry While '" Director o(Public Works Approved~ ". Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR THE USE OF PROPOSITION lB FUNDS TO THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 WHEREAS, the state of California is authorized to sell approximately $20 billion of general obligation funds for transportation projects; and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco's share of Proposition IB funds for fiscal year 2007-2008 is one million seven thousand dollars ($1,007,000); and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco performed visual surveys and cost estimates that identified fifteen streets needing major construction repairs as the City's plan as required by the State to receive the aforementioned funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes staff to submit this plan to the State Controller's office and file the appropriate application to receive the maximum amount of funds allocated to the City. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted b6' the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the Ii day of March 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN : ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk ~'t1\ S:4N '&1 (0 n >-< ~ \:l t"J U 0 ~l~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 5 DATE: March 12,2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sharon Ranals, Director of Recreation and Community Services SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE AT COMMON GREENS GREENDALE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT NO. 51-13232..0824 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding the Phase II Common Greens Greendale Neighborhood JPlayground Structure Replacement Project utilizing a cooperative purchasing agreement on the City of Castro Valley's bid, awarded to Miracle PlaySystems of Alamo, California ill the amount of $61,998.81. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Phase II of a two (2) phase project will replace two (2) playground structures located in the Westborough Common Greens Greendale neighborhoods (see attached map of Area 31 and Area 34). The playground structures were installed in 1993 and are now aged beyond standard repairs. The playground structure industry standard warranty is ten (10) years and it is recommended that playground structures be replaced every ten (10) to fifteen (15) years. This project will remove the old equipment, tan bark or sand and install new playground structures, which are ADA compliant, and tan bark ground cover. The removed playground structures will be donated to a local service club, who will refurbish, reassemble and install them in disadvantaged neighborhoods in Mazatlan, Mexico. The City uses cooperative, inter-agency purchasing agreements to purchase vehicles and equipment whenever it is practical and cost-effective. Section 4.04.040 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code expressly authorizes such agreements when made in conformance with procedures established by state law. Miracle PlaySystems, Inc. has agreed to these conditions. Common Greens Greendale Playground Replacement - Phase 2 Estimate $65,000.00 Miracle PlaySystems, Inc. Alamo, CA Bid $61,998.81 Staff Report Subject: Common Greens Greenda1e ?--ieighborhood P1aygrOlmd Structure Replacement March 12, 2008 Page 2 Staff has reviewed the qualifications and references of the contractor, Miracle PlaySystems and found them to be satisfactory. Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Miracle PlaySystems, Inc. of Alamo, CA in the amount of$61,998.81. FUNDING: Funding for this project in the amount of $150,000 is included in the City's 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Project Program (CIP/51-13232-0824). This will complete Phase II of a tvvo (2) phased project. CONCLUSION: Replacement of the hvo (2) playground structures is projected to begin by April 28, 2008 and be completed by the end of June 2008. Park Division personnel will monitor the removal and installation activities of the contractor. Replacement will provide a better user experience and enhance overall safety. By: ~t1/11~ Sharon Ranals Director of Recreation and Community Services (-- --~.c!-, ) \ / Approved: .'.' i;;.w~~,.J ... ( :J:/"\ B'a~/M: Nagel (0 ---- City Manager ',---- Attachments: Resolution Playground Structure Replacement Project Location Map Area 31 Diagram and Layout Area 34 Diagram and Layout RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION A WARDING PHASE II OF THE REPLACEMENT OF TWO (2) PLA YGROUND STRUCTURES IN THE WESTBOROUGH COMMON GREENS AREA OF GREENDALE BETWEEN KENT/CROFTON AND RADBURN, UTILIZING A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT ON THE CITY OF CASTRO V ALLEY'S BID. 2007-2008 CIP PROJECT NO.51-13232-0824 WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding the Phase II of West borough Common Greens Greendale neighborhoods Playground Structure replacement project for two (2) locations, utilizing a cooperative purchasing agreement on the City of Castro Valley's bid, awarded to Miracle PlaySystems, Inc. of Alamo, California in the amount of$61,998.81; and WHEREAS, the project will involve removal of the old playground equipment and installation of new ADA-compliant playground equipment; and WHEREAS, the old playground structures will be donated to a local service club, who will refurbish, reassemble and install them in disadvantaged neighborhoods in Mazathm, Mexico; and WHEREAS, Section 4.04.040 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code expressly authorizes inter-agency cooperative purchasing agreements when made in conformance with procedures established by state law; and WHEREAS, funding is included in the 2007/2008 CIP Budget (CIP/51-13232-0824) in the amount of $150,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby award a contract to Miracle P1aySystems, Inc. of Alamo, California, in the amount of $61,998.81 for Phase II of a two (2) phased project funded in the 2007/2008 CIP Budget in the amount of $150,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the contract on behalf of the City of South San Francisco. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of , 2008 by the following vote AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Krista Martinelli-Larson, City Clerk OAA'.liIN( .~ ,~~ ~oo ~0un : AREA 31 SQUARE TRANSFE\ POINT. 4' OECK 714-B51-459 CANYON CLIMBER 714-721 GROOVE SLIDE 714-727-5 SAFETY PANEL AGES 5-12 714-7~ ~ DUCK WALK CLIMBER 714-779-4 FOSSil BLUFF CLIMBER 714-73B-B5 10 5 TYPHOON SLIDE 405' ONE PIECE 714-749-59 WHIRL 303 PROTECTIVE SPACE: 61' X38' SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA PROTECTIVE AREA: 1,870 SQ.Ff. AREA 31-1A SCALE: NOTED DRAWN BY: JM ALL DRAWINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED BEFORE FINAL SALE. ALL SITE DIMENSIONS WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO SALE AND DATE: 10/28/07 INST ALLA TTON. MIRACLEe RECREATION EQUIPMENT COMPANY ~~ m MIRACLEe llli PLAYSYSTEMS INe ~oo ~0un : ~~ AREA 34 OUPLI-GA TOR SLIDE 718-771-65 BUMP & GLIDE SLIDE 718-728-4 REST STOP (BELOW DECK) 718-715-7B SQUARE TRANSFER POINT. 4' DECK 718-851-459 10 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 5 1 Xl3' 32' ~ SAFETY PANEL AGES 5-12 714-734 ALL DRAWINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED BEFORE FINAL SALE ALL SITE DIMENSIONS WILL NEED TO BE VERTFTED PRIOR TO SALE AND INSTALLATION. MIRACLEe RECREATION tQU1I'MENT COMPANY ~'t\l ~ -" (0 ~ :>- .... ~ ~ t,) 0 ~~~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 6 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 12, 2008 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE ACCESS AND INTERNAL ROADWAYS AT CENTENNIAL TOWERS - TERRABA Y PHASE 111- TO BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE ROAD AND ACCEPTING TOWER PLACE AS THE NAME OF SAID ROAD Applicant: J ack My(~rs, Myers Development Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution allowing the access and internal roadways at Terrabay Phase III to be: considered a private road and accepting Tower Place as the name of said road. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Applicant, Jack Myers, has requested that the driveway access to the two office towers in Terrabay Phase III, now known as Centl~nnial Towers, be considered a private roadway and allow the naming ofthe road as Tower Place. An of the Terrabayroadways, with the exception of South San Francisco Drive in Phase II, are privah~ streets. The Terrabay Specific Plan for all three phases of Terrabay identifies the roadways as private with certain development standards codified in the Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District. Private streets were preferred by the City, and in particular the Fire and Police Departments, throughout the 28 year Terrabay planning history. The environmental documents for Terrabay, the Terrabay Specific Plan, Terrabay Precise Plan and Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District all address this ownership in one form or another. All three phases ofT errabay, including Centennial Place, have maintenance agreements in place for the private streets, Under the provisions of the South San Francisco Municipal Code private roads are required to be identified on a tentative map and formally accepted by the City Council. The Centennial Towers roadways were not named at the time of Precise Plan approval on October 11, 2006. On February 7, 2008, the Planning Commission approved a parcel map for Centennial Towers which included the street names. Therefore, the formal naming and acceptance is now before the City Council. The request has been reviewed by all affected City Departments and Divisions including Planning, Police, Fire, Building and Engineering. Engineering has determined that the driveway and roadways Staff Report Subject: Centennial Towers Private Street Naming and Acceptance Page 2 meet all necessary design criteria to be considered a private road, Planning staffhas verified that the roadways are designed to the Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District standards, in particular Sections 20.63.140 (a) (2) (b) and (c). The codified standards were analyzed and addressed at length by the City's circulation consultant, Mr. Mark Crane of Crane Transportation, and discussed in detail with the Planning Commission during its public hearings on the project. The combined staff preference on the names submitted for the roadways was Tower Place, since there is already a Tower Lane elsewhere in the County. No other concerns were raised except to note that the applicant is to be responsible for all related costs and associated signage, which is also contained in the Conditions of Approval adopted in October 2006. FUNDING No effect at this time. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, accept the access road into Terrabay Phase III as a private road and allow it to be named Tower Place. By: K1arty VanDuyn Assistant City Mana r - APProv~ (=:) M. Nagel City Manager Attachment: Resolution Parcel Map Letter from applicant dated August 20, 2007 MVD:SK/ak/b1a 1065729.1 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE ACCESS AND INTERNAL ROADWAYS AT CENTENNIAL TOWERS - TERRABA Y PHASE III- TO BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE ROAD AND ACCEPTING TOWER PLACE AS THE NAME OF SAID ROAD WHEREAS, applicant Jack Myers has requested that the City allow driveway access to the two Centennial office towers in Terrabay Phase III be considered a private roadway and authorize said roadway to be named Tower Place; and WHEREAS, the Terrabay Specific Plan for all three phases of Terrabay identifies the roadways as private with certain development standards codified in the Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the environmental documents for Terrabay, the Terrabay Specific Plan, the Terrabay Precise Plan and the Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District all address private ownership and all three phases of Terrabay have maintenance agreements in place for all private streets; and WHEREAS, staff recommend that the Council allow the access and internal roadways at Centennial Towers - Terrabay Phase III to be considered a private road and accept Tower Place as the name for said road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the access and internal roadways at Terrabay Phase III to be considered a private road and accepts Tower Place as the name for said road. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting hdd on the day of , 2008 by the following vote AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Krista Martinelli-Larson, City Clerk 1065740.1 l- ii 'i i~ ~~~~ 3 i 1< l f\"i1 ~~f!l: & ... .. ,k i "I Drllltlng-'-' 3 ,~~~~\ ,,' \" '\~\.....---\ \ -<:\-c\ \t /,/ \ ,'.... /'..., .,~,' l'.......-"l '\ \/.: ~-\j'-"".~ ~\\ '\;L-i:. \ \ \ \;' Dr b . ~~.-J \ '.-c', \ I>.." ....'r. 1\ ' \ 2:.;.", I \ \~ \. " ",,? ~. \. -:::--, \. ,,\, ,c-"" \ ,~\ \ . ""0\ \\\'.\~~5\, \ ..\.. \.j:;'j~...'V.'. ? \\ "{OJ -.."'~. ,- PARCEL 1 tAl "'lEll PlJl,lPSTA1lOM (lEe coUllERCIAL P_ GARAGE 0- (J)oc( o:::::ii z W < :>...1...1)- :>WD.o- o UW5 1-0:!::8 ...I oc( 1Il 0 oc(O-cl'! Z wlll~ Z ~o~ WI-D.", I- oc( ~ ZI-D. Wu Z 0 W u I- !Q u z g ~ ;0 :> o '" tIlJE 1. 1HE REaPRQCAl EASDOT ARDOl ("1lEA' PllOVIOES rtIl [ASEYENTS FeR ACCESS,fJIO US( FCR 90TH PARCElS I AIlO:r. 'M1H RESPECllO ROAD.....1S N() PClE51l8AM WAl.kWAYS. PNlkIC. U1l.lTT Fo\OU11ES. DIERGOlCYSEJMC[S.1ttE COUId\l ft.D,IEJrflS (AS DEfMD It tHE REA). ..vi) wst:El.lAHE0l5 EASEWEMlS AU. -'SPROWlEDRlRAMlleCAllDllN DETM.tl mtREA. M AI'I'Rm(ll NIl ACREED REAWllII:RECOllIlED'Mm M APPIlDVED PARCEL"..... l. 1HE fUPR(MMOnS (III:UIIIlG an NOT lU1tD TO BlUIfGS. S1REm AND VTll1lES)~ CI\l1ltS!HETNlr.1.MlER CONSTRUC11ONlM M:tORDAHCE.TH THE FJu.L lEARABATSPttflC PlANDAlm JNlJARY 2fJf1 NIlllE PAECSE P\..AN OAtED SEP1EI&R :U. 200II AS N'PlKMD BY SOUTH SAN FRNI:lSCO CITY COJHCI.. 1lESOUl1104MA.8Z-ZDlIIDAlED OCTOBER 11,2008. < z '" o ... :J < u \ I \ I \ /1 \ ./>f /~ +__x-./"f: WOl!I! ~ eBlll'.QSEIl -- - .----------- ---- ------- -~- _.,,_ _.'T_ NON[ - NONE ~ JOINT TRENCH urClRIC UNE GAS LH: LOT LINE SAtfTARY SE\IER UNE .ATER Uti( STOR~ DR~ UNE / ~ K,IJ.IIJI FUT i!> Sri .... .a=:: ~ ~ r~-I .- o ~ "~ ~8 ~~ [ 10.1>=8:: ~.~~ ~O!! ilii~~ a~ii i i . I I k\\r<d' i~~-Jf:p~ II J r\'". /.'I"~ wiji""" irl ';'"'" :Ir'<-~ if"". $It. ".;,. d....i\I.'1\1 r." " ." \1 t,.. .I''>~, f.\ ,~ [i'''' I r-", Iii l~,J.. ' .~. R ~,\t'.. , :1 1 ~,\ . ~ ~1 d' ~ 1.7" \~ Ii - ./., A "'11 ....~ '4 ~ -",,}4 '~I.""'JP ~~h.:-.......J; /tl.;,",o.; r/ ,.J 1/\.:...-:1 .:....,,~_,~. 'iJ.<.:" ii.:-;:rJ '1- ['" (~" ~I1R 1'(\. .. i..) \ ....\\ . ot,,,,,, ....P. ~... .~ \ y August 20, 2007 Mr. Barry Nagel City Manager City of South San Francisco P,O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Centennial Towers - Terrabay Phase III - Building Address Dear Barry: Myers Development Company, on behalf of Myers Peninsula Venture, LLC, would like to establish the pennanent address for the towers at Terrabay Phase ill, Centennial Towers. We have been infol1ned that since the project's intelnal street was not named at the time of the project approval, we would need to process this request through the City Council. Therefore we would like to ask that this item bl~ added to the agenda for the ne:>...i City Council Meeting on September 12,2007, We are seeking approval for any ofthe following street addresses: One Tower Place (for the South Tower) and Two Tower Place (for the North Tower); One Tower Lane (for the South Tower) and Two Tower Lane (for the North Tower); or One South Tower Place and Two North Tower Place, Should you need any additional infonnation, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (415) 644-8330 Thank you for your assistance, Sincerely, ~~RSDEVELOP~1ENTCOMWANY J~~ Chairman & Chief Executive Officer cc: Sam Bautista, City of South S~m Francisco Allison Knapp, Knapp Consulting Mike Black, Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company 1 () I Sccnnd \1 ret1'.. ~',uili.' ') r1:) " .l.,;."\J'J Franci:;(i', (:/\ 1.)1/ 1 (J '~l ~ "ldl.'l'h:nH.': (.11 ')} .';'7';'.J3iO .. hI;':: (/j 1 )) '.~.'77".r\~ 1 v..'\v\v. J"n y,:rsdc\'r..lcp:l)cnt. C~)ln - fI ~ . ~\J.\ (~ ~ ~ ~ t,) 0 ~l!&~\~ Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #7 DATE: March 12, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITION 99 AND CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 98 BACKGROUND: At its regular meeting on February 27, 2008, the City Council received an information report and presentation on two eminent domain reform ballot measure initiatives that will appear on the June 3, 2008 ballot. Following the report, the City Council instructed staff to prepare resolutions expressing the City Council's support for Proposition 99, "The Homeowners and Private Property Protection Act," and its opposition to Proposition 98, "The California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act." DISCUSSION: Proposition 99, proposed by the League of California Cities, amends Section 19 of Article I of the California Constitution to limit governments' eminent domain authority, As discussed in more detail in the information report given and received at the February 27, 2008 City Council meeting, the initiative would prohibit governments from acquiring by eminent domain, owner-occupied single-family residences, except where such acquisition is used to protect public health and safety, or used to prevent serious, repeated criminal activity, respond to an (~mergency, or remedy environmental contamination, The Secretary of State's Office and the Legislative Analyst's Office have stated that Proposition 99 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on local governments, nor dramatically affect current land acquisition practices. Proposition 98, proposed by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, amends Section 19 of Article I of the California Constitution to limit governments' eminent domain authority. As discussed in more detail in the information report given and received at the February 27, 2008 City Council meeting, the initiative would require governments to state a public purpose for the taking of private property, and would require that the property only be taken for that stated public purpose. It would also prohibit the taking of private property for private use, The Secretary of State's Office and the Legislative Analyst's Office have stated that Proposition 98 is expected to increase land acquisition costs for local governments. It will also eliminate redevelopment agencies' authority to take property for development by a private developer or for a private use, and would or could increase the likelihood that certain regulatory programs, such as rent control and inclusionary housing ordinances, would be found to effect a taking of property requiring just compensation, CONCLUSION: Approval of the attached resolutions would allow the City Council to lawfully express their position on the two eminent domain initiatives that will appear on the June 2008 ballot. By: ,~ S~ven T. Mattas, City ttomey ~ l'{,J ~.~ Barry M. N el, City ~ager RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITION 99, APPEARING ON THE JUNE 3. 2008 BALLOT WHEREAS, Proposition 99, a ballot measure initiative entitled the "Homeowners and Private Property Protection Act," has received a sufficient number of signatures and will appear on the June 3, 2008 ballot; and WHEREAS, Proposition 99 will amend Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution to limit governments' eminent domain authority, specifically prohibiting the acquisition by eminent domain of certain owner-occupied, single-family residences for the purpose of conveying such property to a private person; and WHEREAS, Proposition 99 includes certain exceptions for the protection of the public health and safety, and for preventing serious, repeated criminal activity, responding to an emergency or remedying environmental contamination; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of State and Legislative Analyst's Office do not expect Proposition 99 to have a significant fiscal impact on local governments, nor do they expect the initiative to significantly affect governments' current land acquisition practices; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the constitutional amendment proposed in Proposition 99 is an appropriate protection for single-family homeowners. NOW, THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, that the City Council hereby expresses its support for Proposition 99, the "Homeowners and Private Property Protection Act," appearing on the June 3, 2008 ballot. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of , 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN : ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 1064725.1 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 98, APPEARING ON THE JUNE 3. 2008 BALLOT WHEREAS, Proposition 98, a ballot measure initiative entitled "The California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act," has received a sufficient number of signatures and will appear on the June 3, 2008 ballot; and WHEREAS, Proposition 98 will amend Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution to limit governments' eminent domain authority, specifically requiring that a public purpose for the taking of private property be stated, and that the property only be taken for that stated public purpose, and further prohibiting private property from being taken for a private use; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of State and Legislative Analyst's Office expect Proposition 98 to increase land acquisition costs for local governments, eliminate the ability of redevelopment agencies to acquire property by eminent domain for development by a private developer or for any private use; WHEREAS, Proposition 98 includes language that would define a taking to include rent control, as has been adopted by local agencies and the voters in cities throughout the state and also includes language that may broaden the definition of a taking to include programs such as inclusionary housing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the constitutional amendment proposed in Proposition 98 is an overly broad reformation of governments' eminent domain authority. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, that the City Council hereby expresses its opposition to Proposition 98, "The California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act," appearing on the June 3, 2008 ballot. * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of , 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 1064732.1 ~'t\l ~ S lo ~ :>- .... ~ ~ t,) 0 04l~~ Staff Re120rt AGENDA ITEM #8 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 12, 2008 Honorable Mayor and City Council Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIVE MONTH TIME EXTENSION (PCA08- 0001) OF A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND DESIGN REVIEW SITUATED AT 111 CHESTNUT A VENUE: 1) Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19. 2) Exceptions from the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lot sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right-of-way, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19. 3) Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20,78, 4) Design Review allowing for the construction a two-story eight (8) unit condominium development, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the High Density (R-3-L) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20,85. Owner: United Ng Limited Partnership Applicant: Best Design Case No.: PCA8-0001 (P02-0020: AHA02-0001, SA02-000, PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008) Env. Doc.: Negative Declaration ND02-0002 (Adopted by the City Council July 2005) RECOMMENDATION That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the attached resolution to approve a five month time extension of the subject permits. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION At its October 24, 2007 meeting, the City Council approved a three-month time extension of the entitlements for an eight unit residential condominium at 111 Chestnut Avenue in order to allow sufficient time for the applicant to meet with City staff, revise the Tentative Subdivision Map to Staff Report Subject: PCA08-0001 Time Extension Page 2 incorporate a common area including the driveway, open parking and recreation areas, and revise the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) to reflect the map changes. The applicant has met with City staff, revised the map and CC&Rs, and is requesting a time extension with an expiration date of July 20, 2008, the maximum allowed by the Municipal Code (SSFMC), The key map change was to create a common area (rather than easements) providing each owner with an undivided interest in the common area, and providing that the control and maintenance of the common area will become the responsibility of the Westborough Highlands Homeowners Association, This will help avoid potential conflicts over use of these areas. The construction drawings have been plan checked and are ready to be issued, The Tentative Subdivision Map and CC&Rs have been reviewed by City staff and meet the SSFMC requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration was approved for the proposed residential development by the City Council in July 2005, after having been duly noticed and circulated for 20 days for public review, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No substantive comments were received during the original review and no comments have been offered during the time extension reviews. In City staffs opinion no significant changes have occurred in the environment or to the proposed development that would warrant revising and/or re-circulating the environmental document. Because the environmental document is judged to be relevant, in accordance with CEQA, the City Council need take no further action. CONCLUSION The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map provides a common area incorporating shared areas that will result in reducing ownership conflicts. The map changes have been reviewed by representatives of the Building, Engineering and Planning Divisions, and the City Attorney's Office to ensure conformance with the City development standards. Staff recommends the City Council follow the Planning Commission recommendation and adopt the attached resolution to approve a five month time extension of the subject entitlements. By: Marty Van Duyn Assistant City Mana er ---, Approved, , ~ Attachments: Draft City Council Resolution Planning Commission Resolution Planning Commission February 21,2008 Staff Report February 21, 2008 Minutes Revised Tentative Subdivision Map & Plans MVD:SK/sc/bla RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIVE MONTH TIME EXTENSION NO. PCA 08-0001 OF A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 0.52 ACRE SITE SITUATED AT 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 21,2008 to consider the Time Extension for the Project, as both are defined below. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the Time Extension; WHEREAS, the South San Francisco City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on March 12, 2008 to consider the Time Extension for the Project, as both are defined below; WHEREAS, as required by SSFMC Title 20 (Zoning Regulations) and SSFMC Title 19 (Subdivision Ordinance), the City Council makes the following findings in support of a Five (5) Month Time Extension (the "Time Extension") of a Residential Planned Unit Development, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Design Review on a 0.52 acre site situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue, owned by Ng's Chestnut LLC (the "Project"), based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco City Council which include, but are not limited to a Housing Agreement dated November 22,2005; Architectural and Landscape Plans, dated September 2007, prepared by Best Designs and Construction Company; the conditions of approval adopted by the City Council on July 13, 2005; the February 21,2008 Planning Commission staff report; the February 21,2008 Planning Commission meeting; the March 12, 2008 City Council staff report; and the March 12, 2008 City Council meeting. 1. The project is consistent with the provisions of the City's General Plan that support residential development, and specifically with the Housing Element that supports provision of additional market rate and affordable housing in the community to meet on- going demand. The proposed density of 15.39 units per acre for the 0.52 acres to be developed with dwellings is well within the overall density of 37.5 units per acre for the High Density Residential category provided in the City's General Plan. 2. The 0.52 acre site is physically suited for the proposed townhouse subdivision, 3. The development will create a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability and will result in an intensity ofland use similar to adjacent multi-family and single-family neighborhoods. The proposed density of 15.39 units per acre and the general style and quality of the new residences and site improvements is substantially similar to or superior to recently approved subdivisions in the City. 4. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted by the City Council on July 13, 2005 in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Mitigated Negative Declaration No.02-0020 identifies a couple of potential adverse impacts attributable to the development of eight (8) new residences. The impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of mitigation measures. A mitigation monitoring program is established to ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation measures including a mitigation monitoring program have been incorporated into the project or made conditions of approval which will reduce identified impacts to a less than a significant level. 5. The Subdivision ofthe 0,52 acre lot allowing the development of eight (8) townhouses and common area will not be adverse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor unreasonably detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. The use is compatible with the existing neighboring residential uses, Site improvements including the provision of upgrades to the public infrastructure, and landscaping of all of the yards of each new lot and common area will reduce potential adverse impacts to the public infrastructure, circulation conflicts and provide a streetscape that is comparable to the surrounding neighborhoods. 6. The eight (8) new town houses and site landscaping comply with the City's Design Guidelines. 7. The residences comply with the requirements of South San Francisco Municipal Code Title 20 Zoning Regulations. The design and improvements are not in conflict with any known existing public easements. 8. Therefore, on the basis ofthe foregoing Recitals which are incorporated herein, the City of South San Francisco's General Plan, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Staff Report, and on the basis ofthe specific conclusions set forth below, the City Council finds and determines that the Time Extension is necessary to allow the development to proceed and is consistent with the objectives, policies, genera11and uses and programs specified and contained in the City's General Plan in that (a) the General Plan designation for the site is High Density Residential and the proposed subdivision and townhouse development is consistent with those land use designations, and (b) the Project is consistent with the fiscal policies of the General Plan with respect to provision of public infrastructure and services, and housing, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approve the Five (5) Month Time Extension of Residential Planned Unit Development 02-0020, Tentative Subdivision Map 02-0020, Design Review 02-0020 subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at the regular meeting held on the day of 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2667-2008 PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING THAT THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A FIVE-MONTH TIME EXTENSION NO. PCA 08-0001 OF A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 0.52 ACRE SITE SITUATED AT 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE. WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 21,2008; WHEREAS, as required by SSFMC Title 20 (Zoning Regulations) and SSFMC Title 19 (Subdivision Ordinance), the Planning Commission makes the following findings in support of a Five (5) Month Time Extension of a Residential Planned Unit Development, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Design Review on a 0.52 acre site situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue, owned by Ng's Chestnut LLC, based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission which include, but are not limited to a Housing Agreement dated November 22,2005; Architectural and Landscape Plans, dated September 2007, prepared by Best Designs and Construction Company; the February 21,2008 Planning Commission staff report; and the February 21,2008 Planning Commission meeting. 1. The project is consistent with the provisions of the City's General Plan that support residential development, and specifically with the Housing Element that supports provision of additional market rate and affordable housing in the community to meet on- going demand, The proposed density of 15.39 units per acre for the 0.52 acres to be developed with dwellings is well within the overall density of37.5 units per acre for the High Density Residential category provided in the City's General Plan. 2. The 0.52 acre site is physically suited for the proposed townhouse subdivision. 3. The development will create a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability and will result in an intensity ofland use similar to adjacent multi-family and single-family neighborhoods. The proposed density of 15.39 units per acre and the general style and quality of the new residences and site improvements is substantially similar to or superior to recently approved subdivisions in the City, 4. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted by the City Council on July 13, 2005 in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Mitigated Negative Declaration No.02-0020 identifies a couple of potential adverse impacts attributable to the development of eight (8) new residences. The impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of mitigation measures, A mitigation monitoring program is established to ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation measures including a mitigation monitoring program have been incorporated into the project or made conditions of approval which will reduce identified impacts to a less than a significant level. 5. The Subdivision of the 0.52 acre lot allowing the development of eight (8) townhouses and common area will not be adverse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor unreasonably detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. The use is compatible with the existing neighboring residential uses. Site improvements including the provision of upgrades to the public infrastructure, and landscaping of all of the yards of each new lot and common area will reduce potential adverse impacts to the public infrastructure, circulation conflicts and provide a streetscape that is comparable to the surrounding neighborhoods, 6, The eight (8) new town houses and site landscaping comply with the City's Design Guidelines. 7. The residences comply with the requirements of South San Francisco Municipal Code Title 20 Zoning Regulations. The design and improvements are not in conflict with any known existing public easements. 8. Therefore, on the basis ofthe foregoing Recitals which are incorporated herein, the City of South San Francisco's General Plan, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Staff Report, and on the basis of the specific conclusions set forth below, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Time Extension is necessary to allow the development to proceed and is consistent with the objectives, policies, general1and uses and programs specified and contained in the City's General Plan in that (a) the General Plan designation for the site is High Density Residential and the proposed subdivision and townhouse development is consistent with those land use designations, and (b) the project is consistent with the fiscal policies of the General Plan with respect to provision of public infrastructure and services, and housing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the South San Francisco City Council approve the Time Extension of Residential Planned Unit Development 02-0020, Tentative Subdivision Map 02-0020, Design Review 02-0020 subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco at the regular meeting held on the 21 st day of February 2008 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioner Honan, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Sim, Commissioner Zemke and Chairperson Giusti NOES: Commissioner Prouty ABSTAIN: Vice Chairperson Teglia ABSENT: None Attest: /s/ SUSY Ka1kin Susy Ka1kin Secretary to the Planning Commission CONSTRUCTION 111 OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY CHESTNUT AVE'1 DWELLINGS SOUTH SAN FRA CISCOl CA PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" BUILDING FLOOR AREA. UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 GROUND FLOOR 1,024.54 SF 1,173.93 SF 960.49 SF 1,145.43 SF 1,145.43 SF 1,030.37 SF 1,059.59 SF 1,044.05 SF SECOND FLOOR 1,101.74 SF 1,345,95 SF 1,095.76 SF 1,233.93 SF 1,233.93 SF 1,092.12 SF 1,227.51 SF 1 ,171. 1 7 SF THIRD FLOOR - SF 549.69 SF 552.14 SF 657 SF 657 SF 621.45 SF 620.68 SF - SF TOTAL 2,126.28 SF 3,069.57 SF 2,608.39 SF 3,036.36 SF 3,036.36 SF 2,743.94 SF 2,907.78 SF 2,215.22 SF UNIT 1 BEDROOMS BATHS SCOPE OF WORK UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 160'-0. 15'-oi' 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 PROJECT DATA 1. CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 2. MECHANICAl, ELECTRICAL &: PLUMBING UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. OWNER: NG'S CHESTNUT LLC. 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA. TABLE OF CONTENT A-I TITLE SHEET A- 2 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 1 A-3 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 1 A-4 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 2 A-5 PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 2 A-6 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 2 A-7 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 3 A-8 PROPOSED PlAN &: ELEVATIONS UNIT 3 A-9 PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 4 A-10 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 4 A-11 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 4 A-12 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 5 A-13 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 5 A-14 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 5 A-IS PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 6 A-16 PROPOSED PLAN &: ELEVATIONS UNIT 6 A-17 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 7 A-18 PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 7 A-19 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 7 A-20 PROPOSED PlANS UNIT 8 A-21 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 8 BLOCK: 312 LOT: 9 ZONE: R3 OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-l NO. OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 8 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: :;l-N HEIGHT LIMIT: 40'-0" MAX. ! ! ~! ~i ~! i j i i , t10'-0., , , i : i ! SITE MAP N.T.S. BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCfION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suite IOOC Brisbane Shopping Calla, Brisb&ne, CA 94005 Tcl415-656-J528 Fax 415-656-+116 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue. Suite 0 Tcl4 I ~~5~~~6?~~ ?5'~~~-J476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCAlE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-1 DRAWING TITLE TITLE SHEET, SITE MAP, PLOT PLAN SHEET NO. -1 1 OF 21 SHEETS I ~ PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" I a, o I ~ -.- - ~ -- I -- I ob I I- -- +-- --, I I I I I I -,- I -j-- I -1._ I I I ~ I -- I I.IY!lliL.RQ.Q! I I ~ I I I I - I I I 00 I I I I iEtJ ~ I I I I I I I I I I it 1';--71 '-- I I 'x/ I I I / " I iillQ[Jj I 1<:- :"r I I I I I ~=-=r 1 ON ,--- ;:;:; I .------ I - I-- \ 1 / I c::::::J A mc - I--- \ 1 r I - r.CESS - I-- \ 1 I 66lli PANEL - I-- OPj:tf TO 1 I - I--- BEkOW I r " / \ OQ 1,/1 - I--- / \ I ~s~$ - I-- / \ IlECK I - I-- / \ I I I I - Wiv m 8 :/x, I L -> I " \~~~L ACCESS I I I II 6.EOOQQM I I 1 I II c:;-- I 1 I II I I II l'I8l.K=.lli I Q.QSfl I L~ I I ~, I L PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" I I I I I I I 1 I I I 17 I.~ I I I I I I 1 I I I I -.J ~ I ~ ,------------ s- ~ METERS llEQ!l.QQM tJ&l.l'it,Y PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"01'-0' -, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I --, I u 1 BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old Coun'y Road, Suil<: lOOC Brisb~c4~~'?E~~f5~~'F~.;\'f~5154\ ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH omCE 2010 Ocean Avenue:, SU11e D San F rnncisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452.8676 Fax 4 I 5-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT A VE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-1 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 1 SHEET NO. 2 OF 21 SHEETS FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ~~ @@ TILE REAR ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" _RIDGE ---14'-10-5L![. _CEILING _20'-2' _ _LOWER CEllING_ 17'-2" _2/~ ~2~ _LOWER 2iL ~2~ _ G/fl!:9YQlL _ O'::.Q.:.. (F.F.46.3J') ~GE .:.!.:.-0::J!.F.45.33') _LOWER GiL .....::.!.'-.!Q1F.F.44.00') _RIDGE ---14'.:.!.Q.-S.L!r. _CEILING _20'-2" _LOWER CEll1NG_ 17'-2" _2/~ ~2~ _ _LOWER 2iL ~2~ ...JiIr{!:Q!ERL --.!r -U.F.46.33') _GARAGE .:2:..-0::J!.F.4S.33") -.b..OWQ0/~ -1'-lffi.H.50') n I II IT I : III : II I II I. I II II I I I II j.llL1L, II II II II I II II I II II I T II II I III Tll II I II. I II 1 I I II I II 1 I I II I 11 TTll----If II rrn II I T I .1 [I II II T II II 1111111 nil II n 11111 III IITlll1 TII 1111111111 IIITII III 1II1IIIITII IITII III I II T :1 I III II II II II il Tl IIITllll1 I IIITII I 1 lilT! liT II I EJ TILE II / SHINGLE ROOF I" I 1llllrnlllTnllT~IIITll 11 II I I II II I I III 1Ill1111 -J JIJTIIIITllllllll1n-IIII1Tll lIT I IITfll11Tlll11111111TII IT rn [0] 0 /STUCCO FlNI SH / rn r---'" ~ ~ TILE = L...-, - WEST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" III I 111111111111111111111111111111111 III I 1111I '"I II l T I II III III 11 II T IITII 1111 II I I II II II T II IIII~ 111111'1'1 11~0 I II II I II III II II I II .1 T II II T 1 II I I II II I II TIll IT I T II I111 II II T 1 I T II f Ilf Y 1IIIIIn 1IIIIIt 1IIIIIIt 11111111] TT Iliff III II II T II IT II 11111 IT II II lilT II lilT II 1IIIi II II III I'Thrir I I II T TIT 1 III I II rT II I I T II II I T II II 1 II I T 1llTTI ~ II T I ITI IllTl 111!l11T! '_no :lLJo EJEJ ~~ \. / / / 103031 O~ = / STUCCO FINISH ICEI/ rn - EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SHINGLE ROOF - --' 1 BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE . 100 Old County Road, Suit<: lDOC BnSb~t4~~'lf~f5~~'F:11';'~1~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean. Avenue, Suite D San Ff1UlClSCO, CA 94127 Tel 415-452.8676 Fax 415-452.3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT A VE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-1 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 1 SHEET NO. -3 3 OF 21 SHEETS 13'-10" IilllliQQ.IL1J ~ , "::! o , ~ "-.. "-.. /' "-.. /' , ~ /' o~ ~ELOW /' /' "-.. /' "-.. /' /' "-.. /' PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" I :;; I ~ l.IY!!:llL.JlQQ ~ I I L___ ~ PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"= l' -0" o D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COM? ANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suite 1 DOC BrisbTcle4~~'1g~f5~~";:.ri't'6'5~1 ~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH omCE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite D San Francisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8616 Fax 415-452-3476 I t: CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING ~ g 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REViSION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 20415.3-2 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 2 SHEET NO, 4 OF 21 SHEETS 1 'w rr=I3'_10" ___ --.::: --- ~~C;-'- ->:==I-,~= 1:=:=J:it::=' Siller.;----I= 1- '-=-r-l- ~ ~~ ~~- - 1- -~~~ ~~~~~-~==I=!~= r-r-\-_I- _ 1--+-'- ~j==~;_c-c~EC==~JI>:=I-'-~==I:~~~:;=~~ ~~-,==;-_ ~~c==~~'~=I=~===)-'~==-~9= ~~--~~==~~~I:=-=~~~=~ -=~'I=L2-1~>:= ~d===c==c=~~=_~=3=:~===~~==~= -~-'=-;_-=--r'--- -)~-___'-,--._~~- =h=_='---I===-~~=-=~=-'~==~-~I=~-~g;~~ ~~---,- -I=~ - -R ~- ,-=~- *4C~=~~'===~~-_-===~====~'===~= =~~==C~~==~==-=~ =~~ -~='-I=>:=~~= SHINGLE-1 =,!:::!:'_ ==~_=I~= -t=- - = ~=\- ===-'-~=-::c>:= ROOF =0==,=\--~'---'- =1-,- -=..==--\~>:==-=r='=_=""1 = -~~=-t=~=I-=-~;-C-I~=-~-- --1=,-,=-*,- -f-l-I= _ -/--,=;_- -, = I-- '--- ='.=J -:::J- - = - ,- - = -,--'- =~;_- =i-- '--- SLOPE 1--;-- = --,1-'=si:OPE - I-~= _ -:--1= =~~==_~'---<=I_-/--,- -=..=- I-'-=_-I-P_=~,= -r-<=;- -t=;= - =~ '--- -r= - -=::1- - =--L- =~_==-,--- ='__ =- _ =~_ -'~~-~--TI= -~==-=~=;-==~-_=-,= ~-'=~f=l~=-~- -l-r;__ -I ;_ '---I=_\-- ---'_,_ --1 --I---r-!- =4'--=_1-'---1=1_,-/--,- --..=-- I-~ =\_-~= =r<=;=_-~=;_I-=C;_ -~- -=~ =d~~==!~~=~d~==~==~==2~=~~-=~~-*= ~~_=_;-,_='=~_=I=-L ___=--'~_~--1=_~-=~= -,l-='-~ --L ~~_, _ _ - _ 1- ~ -I~I_-I-'---'-~;-~'-'=~;-I ~~~--H-~~_-~- =~C-(- - -I '--- - ~ -I~ -~- -~- 1-- - _~:-cl_~ --'=\~_~~ I =4=_!~ ='---b~ I ~~, - ~ =--L~ I =~~~-, =~=:=.r~ I -r-_(= - ~= I=p= I ='::::-1 ='- =\-~ ~~.=I=;-I- ~==~= : =I~~~-' =~=,-E~ I =4-1=== ==t=~=t:::- I - =r:=~;- _ __'= 1--\= I = =r~~C ,=,~~t.=-l:=J- I - ::J: = = == 1-1- I ==:1: =~=- !='~='-C= I - =t =1:=;- _ 1_1- = r--;= I ==r-I- 1- --p- I f= =. -IT-=-= ,-t I 1--;_ - f--;_ 1-,-,= 1_ --;- I I I I I I I I I I I I I o 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L__________________________________~ PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"= I' -a" I~ nl rv I o 1 1::1 MASTrR AfDRooM f\_ '0 ON TOP OF CLOSET BELOW ]?:: ~- ---- ~- - '------'- - - 11== \ / -- __ o~~~o II II I I \ 1 1\ 1 \ ~ 11 OP~TO ~ --- I' ~ II II --:;:::0 ............. II II 11 I- .JJ - I I II II .1 TI II [Q] I II I II >'l II 1 II I II~ ~ I II II II n 11 I I II III II T IT I IT I 11 III I T II I I II I I I II L II II II II II ~~== ~ C~~ 8 (lIT i ;7-~ : - Ii I 1 Ii I I Ii v '\I Ii r---------....!J II II II II II II II II II II I II ~ ATIlC ACCESS PANEL ~ , -~ I 'Xl I L/ ,I L_...oJ ~ I II II II I II II II :II II 111 II II D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old Couoly Road, Sui", 100c Brisb~t4~~'1~~f5~~";;~:ls~~1 ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite: D San Freociscu, CA 94127 Tel 415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 o 1 g I II II I 11 I L II CONSTRUCTION OF 8 II I,I III SINGLE F AMIL Y II I ~ II II DWELLING II II II II II 1 II ;;:; II II II T~ II I II ~ T I "- CHIMNEY II I 1 I I II II I I II II Ie - 111 CHESTNUT A VE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA II 5 II 111;:g II II II II II T II 1 DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT I I I DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ, NO.: AS NOTED 204153-2 PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 2 SHEET NO. 5 OF 21 SHEETS STUCCO FINISH FRONT ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" c:.E:1 I U III I III11 I1II11 I I /SHINGLE R II I 111I1 I T I 1111 II II I I I J T 1111 II T II "I T II I I ~ II II II II II I III II 111I11 LY1 I I I I I II I II II 11111 I I II T II III vn I III III II I 1111 I 11111 I I I "II II " I II I I !I I I III II II I T II I I I 1111 II I II II 1111 II II III II T I III II r III II " T I lilT II lilT II I T Ih- J I Jill II I I II II II T II II Ii I " II II" II I STUCCO FINI - 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ [53] REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" _~OL _2!r.-f'_ _ <].1L.!t!G_ .16:':0':' _~F__l[-Q:_ _UF_ J::O':'_ QfF_ _O'::OJF[4.!!,OO') GARAGE -1.::0"(47.00') _ILODL _2[ -f' _ _ <].'L.!t!G_ .16:':0':' STUCCO FINISH ODF _ ~F _ _1[-Q: _ SH _ y'F _ J::O'::" _ QfF_ _O'::~FL4.!!,oo') CAAAGE - -1.::0"(47.00') [@] rn EAST ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" rn rn WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" .BEST u DESIGN & CONSTRUCTlO COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Rood, Suite IDOC Bris~e4~~'1f~~5~~'~::t~~~C:-l ~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite D San Francisen, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, C DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: KS PROJ, NO.: 204153-2 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 2 SHEET NO. h OF 71 <;HFF .' -" 1"-" ~ ~ r- I I I I ) I)[( I I I I I :-- ..J I -0" ~I LJ~ ~ Q ~ 00 - MASTER BEDROOM r-------- ft 'ti&K.::.!!il1. - '1 :~ - ~ ~I: X: I ATTIC ACCESS II '-. X / I PANEL ~ / '-. I ~__:>J ~ ----j ., ~ ill=r==fi='=i=1 I=p- -1=1-- I=I-~ i==,_I- 1='=-===1=- '---1==1=,= ,- - =1- -1-1- -1= 1-1= 1- --j - I--J- = -_ =1- = 1=1- ='--1=,- =,- - -i= - =:;-- - 1-)- = -1= =1-=1-,- ---1=1= - =1= -\=,........,- 1-=- - =)- !~= =~LOP0=1=)-=I= '-1= - 1- 1-1.='=-1= =1-1='-1- '---1='-'- =1= -1- =1-1=i--r_I-I='-I_ 1 =J-:='-l=)-~-I=)- =1- '-1=1-1=)-1_ -r.=:= -1= = I-~\=I=~'= 1- - I-f--- - = --I=I-I--;;Z _ :I=,~,~:=S; ~~ -\=1---,=1- :;z J,I.. =- 17 I liT -'-1- ,::;::( I U = 1- :;;r I ] lJ =j=;;; n III I -::;;~ r I iI ~ L I II _ L UNOCCUPIED ROOF 'j)R[N --!O BELOW _ _ - Il!tl!lliL.BQQM ~ LMllil...llilll ~ ~ _(1 o I ~ r:-. -__ ---.?I- __ __ __ -1-: x:: I -- -- ____ ONI GUEST BEDROOM I -~ I ~ CLS. ", // / 'x/ UP / , / , 1// '.... I -~ SHINGLE ROOF / 11 111/11/1 I I U111 II II I ~ I I U I J L I I I II I I II I II II ~ -t1-H-I-J. 1+ -+I-II-It- +-11-11- ~ l-T -+I-I+H ++- II I I U I 1111 II I U L 1 I I 8'-6" PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" 19'-0" PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" umB I ;::: I I I I ri BEST u DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIO COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Rood, Suite I DOC Bri5\cle4~~~KX~f5~~teF,;"Bftt~'5~1 ~005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite 0 SIlO Fr.mcisco, CA 94127 Td 415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE", SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, C DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: KS PROJ. NO.: 204153-3 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 3 SHEET NO, 7 OF 21 SHEE --- ,--I-- j---j- -\=1 T -- - F-t:::/= -I'--I-~fi = c::= =E:l=F1-=r- -1- 1=l=1~IT = c ;O~t:== 1-f-SLOp~_lt-- = f-~ _l--f'FI-'-I= )';:;: :t::t=?=r-r- - - _:=1=1+ 7' II j II II II I II I IIII 1111 'kl-Fr---c~_lr -lttLtHl-ftHtl-It-HH-H--: -1-1 tt IT h -- = -"' I I 111I III 111111 I I I 't ~ =1-- [- -711 III1 II 11 II 1111:1 1':. - f- 1- -7'l I I II 1"11 I II II 111 11!l .I~l=/=Zll I II IIII~ III II I III I K \;( I 'I I I I II I: II II I II II l ,I I I, I .I I II I I U __ H J II' I U 1III 11,:::- 'ILH+ I II l"-r- - f- - ~ I I II I I .-LI-.-r- -c~J 11 y =t=L- == =;=-l- Iii I V -i=;;;r-c::=- 1- - =r=1=I--'\ v~-Fr-~C=r I-~,==_~" I ~= - -f=t=~:= = =1=1- = --'j= H=--r-I--r-I-r- _ I_~~ ~I_ ~=r-W ~ ~-,_ =~I_ ~~-~~ ~ I-'-'-f-~I- ~~==I--- r-- ~=I=\==~l= ~~-~i- i- =I=)_I=_,~~ ~~~~~ == _I~=~I='~~I= ~ =L- ~ i=~I=I-=I-I= CHI~NEY- ~:=I-- ~:= ='-I=-l- --i~)- =JI-r-- '-- 1_ - I- _ - 1--1= - _F!=,-- I-!.=J- -I-J,= ~!=':::::: SLClPE=1-- -'-.SLOPE -=1=,:- -':::::: ~~ f- _1-- 1- ~r-~~-_I-~r- _ I=)-_l-\~)_ - C:;1=i=: '=\-)=l=~ 1-1=1= I=I~!= -~~'::::::~~Et- r- tJ-I=I=:=l3=H\= ~ IlJ], II I I I HI I I I II _L.1. II I II I III L II I U UI ilL I , II I I lTll 1911 U IJ II 1 II LIIJ I~ '[ I T II H-hH-f;-I H~ II III lVlI III II 11111111 II SHI~~ .J UNOCCIIPlfD ROOF BFlOW PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" o EJEJEJ [EJ [EJ [EJ [EJ _ _RQ9r:...19'=-6~ _ _ _ _CQU~G_ J!:Q.':_ SHINGLE ROOF _ _3/.! _ _1!:Q" _ STUCCO FINISH [jEJ _ _ 2/.! _ .JO.::rr. _ _ ~(!: _ "!"':Q"14~0q] _ .9ABoAG; ..Q::Q'jFL j7.00') PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" U I 3 _ _RQ9~ 19':::L __ _ _CQU~G_ ...?r:Q.':_ _ _3/.! _ __1!:Q"_ _ BJ BffiEl EJ fa _ __2/.! __ .Jo.::rr. _ _ ~(!: __ ..!..::Q"14~00.J_ ~J. _ ..Q::Q" jF L .17.00') PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"01'-0" PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old Couoty Road, Suite rooc BriSt;.~t4~~'1ftf5~~t';,;.BnS~5~1 ~005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OmCE 2010 CX:eao Avenue, Suite D San Frnncisro, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-3 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 3 SHEET NO. ~ lIVING ROOI,( o ~ PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/~.=1'-0. ON UP I ~ I 'g: I ~ ( I I I I I I I 21'-0. I- I I I L_ UP o [a o PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/~.=1'-0. D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 1 DO Old County Road, Suite 1 DOC Bris~de4~~~~tf5~~tF",;.Bfr';.'6~~1 ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFlCE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suile D San Francisco, CA 94127 Tel 415-452-8676 Fall 415-152-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT A VE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DRAWN BY: KS PROJ. NO.: 204153-4 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 4 SHEET NO, 9 OF 21 SHEE ~==~=i~'-=~~~~~C~~~ -E~~- 1-1=1_= 1_~=~~F~~~~~~~~~~e~ I=I-=~=)_I=-=)_I-~~~~~~~-~~~- )_I-_~_I-I-_~I-\=~~=~~~~~~~~~ I--~ -1-\= ,- 1- ~ ~~~ ~~>-- ~ 1=1=:=3=1=e~-I-]=~~~2~~~~~~~ \=l-~-I=)-:=I-=<_I-~~~-~~~-~~~I-- )_1-,- I-I-'-~~~I--~= ~~ ~~~I-- 1-->- ~cst~-I- j- - /-SLOPE~ ~~- ~ ~=I==i=I=~~-'~== -=~~~=~~~-i l=I_==I=)-~==)~r~~-c~~~=~~~= ) b= - =1=1= ---,_:~ ~= =)=:='= =)=~c = Y'l 1-=1- I-,=I~ 1- - ~>-- f-- ~I=I-~=I=~~-I-I-~~--~~~-~~I--- ~I_=~=)_~~~)_r~~-=~~~=~~~= )_'---__1- 1_1- ~=_~~~~~~~- CHIMNEY 1-'- -~I- -_1- - -~~ -~c-- ~ I=:='=~=\='-p~-l=~ ~=~~~=~I--f--~ I-~~~~-~~- I-~~~~~~~)==~~~= ~~'=~=~'-,-~~ ~=~~~~~~C--~~ != '-=I=i=)-I='~- I-I=:j=:j-I- \-~:=~~)=t=-:= I ~~H=~ - ,,:=-,-- 1--\-1=:=_1~=--\- ~-\-I--:==\- I=)'-~~=-'=-I=-!='~~~_I--~~I--~ ~ ~I--~_=H '-~-I=I-=-=)-- --:=I-I--:=~~~:=~=~~~=-:= =j-=)-,='-=-:=I-=I-=I-I=-:=~~I--t=~~ - ~ - -~-:='-i=I-=I-I=~=-I=I-~~~~-~~=~~~=-~ =H=I-'=H=-I=I-_-=~~~H=\-= = \-H=_=H I-~-\=)-'=-=)-l- --:=I-~:=\-~ ~ =~~~~-:= '=r~=)-CI~='-I_ ,_,-=I-I=~\-~I--=\-~-~~~~=I- i-p_!=I-I=I-=I-I=-=-\=)_~~~C-- ~~=~~I--C_~ ~L~~='=~~:\=~I=-=~i~=:=~===~=~2~:==~~ ~~ 1_)-,_ -~l- ,='-[- ~-~~ ~ \-~~ ~ /-1 =)-~I-'=~l- I-I-=I-\=:=\-~~=\-~~~~:=~=\- SHINGLE ROOF - ,- iF ,-/=1-1=1- =: --\=)-~ -\- ~I-- = -(=f-- =I-(:=~=_(= I=)~ -!-I-,_I---c=i=1_ 1-,- =)--1- I--I--:=~ -I-:::~F- ~~~I-- -I-- )_1'-,=,_ 1-,_ .SLOPE 1- I~=)=I-- ~r-t=.SLOPEt....:=):=\== 1--=1_ := It:: 1=~=1=I=I= ~=I-I_I= ~\~= ~:=:~::= =\-~r=~~~)=;=:= )- ;:= I-:~-\=)- '---]-1=,-1= 1- '-1- /--~ = ,-c--f--':= ~(:=~~~t= - ~'=I~=,-I='~=r=I='- - I- :=c,:= ==c/- _ ~I--- _:=1-- 1- I-I~-=-=-_ - 1_ ~r--r-_-~r-_-:=~_I--;= i=p=~-,_=_I-= =I_I=~~~-<=\-~-'=~~-~~ l-b~~=:=I-~=I=I-=-\-I--~=_~~=_:=~I=_~ 1=1'-~~=1-=-=1-=-- ...J- (=~r==-=I--= -I-r==~~~ 1= I: ~==J='=- =:=1=- I~- I-- - /-- = -~ f-- - =~ ~~~I- - --J-,_ ,-,- -, 1= - 1- I-t-- -, =1-1- - =I--\- ~\-~ I-b~~-I=I-=I=r~- H~=_~f--=_:=~c~~ I=)~~~=r~-=-~-~I-/--~~ -I-~ -~:=~~I- ~~'-=1-~I-=I--!= 1_ != ~~I--~=>-- ~-:=\-~I--~ I='~,=-~I-I=I--= 1= = I-\-I--:=~=\-~~=\-:=Y=~- I-IP-~-I=I-=I='-'=~-l- ~-~=_~~=_:=~=~~ \- 1----\_ 1-,- ~~I-,-,- I- ~~~r- -~'c=- -/--:=~.~I- ~:=I-~ I-~_ 1-1--1- 1-~~q-I--I--=:=~t=I--F ~= ~ ~~~ '==]=1=1-=- t--t==i=t= :;l=tr= - 1-'-- ~ 1-)=;;; =t=r:- =1-1- ~t=I-\=~ =\~I=I-,-I- \-t=~~i= _l=.Ii-_SLOPE ~SLOPE)=t= f-+,- ";:"'1- I-Cr-- :3=+I=I~ _ \- ~E -~(:= 1=!=1= - 1- '-- ~l=~ =j::;:,- ";:"'1- I-C~ -,--1. 1= - )= H ..:...= 1=1= :=J=I=- 1-- /-- ~~\== o 1 ~ ,-- lJNOCClJPIFO ROOF AF! OW / I ~ 11'-4" PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0" 1 ";:!; 1 :0 I " / " / " / " / " ,// " / " / " / " / "" OPfN TO AF! OW / / " / " / .........,....../ /" / " / " / " " , , " , , , , " " , o 1 ~ r" -:'-'1 I.. X I }./ '.>1 ATTIC ACCESS/ - PANEL 1L..Il.(QEQQ!,! I L SHINGLE ROOF PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" 'LJlAlli ON u BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTlm COMPANY MAIN OFFlCE 100 Old County Road, Suite 1 DOC BrisbTcle4~~'1ft~5~~t~~~t;~5~1 ~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, SuilC: D San Francisco, CA 94127 Td 415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 1 g: CONSTRUCTION OF f SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, C) DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-4 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 4 SHEET NO. -1 10 OF 21 SHEEl ~ PROPOSED FRONT ELEV A TION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ROOF SHINGLE 88 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" STUCCO FINISH STUCCO FINISH _ _RQ.O~ _~:Q"__ _CQUliG_ _ U::.L _ _3ft _ _\.r:Q"__ _ _2ft _ ~'::9~ _ g/i. Q: -.[ iFL ~.qo') s;AB!'~ ...:: ~-iL l.U-,- 4].00') _ _RQ9~ _~:Q.__ _ _CQUliG_ _?l..':,!f_ _ _3ft _ _\.r:Q"__ _ _2ft _ ~'::9~ _ _ TIlf Yi. _ Q:-'[ ~L ~.qo') ~.I ...::0iL [.F-,- 41.00') STUCCO FINISH B 8 EJ TILE PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ::::= ROOF SHINGLE \ III III II I111 I II II IIII II i'1-.ll11 II I IIII II I I II Illlnll III II 11 IT I ITlI 1IT Ifl I' 1 III T II IT I II Tll I r I ITIIIIIT 11 I 1111T 11 If I III T II I I III T II II I I1II I I T II lilT II I I II II 111111-1 III " I I II " " II IT In IIITII liT 11111 T II I T I ITIll III1 II1TIIIII111111TII In 11 I II I II 111 111 I' II U I T II II 11 'In III II 1111 II lilT ===== ===== 8- B ~ ~ = II IIII II IIII liT ~ I T II II I Tll "I II lilT ~ - ~ r-- f- II HI // ~ '--- ~ '- I ./ VSTuc Iml Iml rn II ~I ,,// '--- ...... TIL :::;:::c co FINISH PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"'1'-0" BEST [j DESIGN & CONSTRUCTlOl COMPANY MAIN OFFICE . 100 Old CounlY Road, Suile 1 DOC Bnsb~t4~~'l~:~5~8'F::r't'6'se~I ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue Suite 0 San Fraoeiseo,CA'94I27 Te1415-452.8676 Fax 415-452.3476 CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ( DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: 20415.3-4 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 4 SHEET NO. -11 1 1 nF 71 SHE ~ Illilf:\QQM 1 -~ L.!Y!llil...RQQ o PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0" ON UP Q!!illi.G....RQ 1 "g: ~ 1 ~ I I I l 21'-0" PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' 1 N I I I J BEST o DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIC COM? ANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Rnad. Suile 100C Brisb~t4~~'lf~~5~~I~~~s~~5~1~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFlCE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite D San Francisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ( DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-5 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 5 SHEET NO. -1 1? OF 7 1 SH -4 ~ l ~r-:=C- I--I~= I;=- -~ 1- f-F==t..:Ll- '- +- - - '=. == =l~!=- c,- C- = 1-:-1_ ~;t==- 1-1- ~J::i= f= :!==- I- 1- - 1=1= I- L \- 1-='-1= 1-+[_ ~ I C.SLO~ ISLOPE f-I=r\- r- +=-,- --=11-1= I-rl- _ I- , ,- I-+-/=:J ClASS B $HINGLE ROOF, \ \- ~ \- '-= - = -j ,_ f-7=c-_ ,= ]-;-\_ ~ L '-_f- -\~I_ I- t= C - I-f-=\::i:~ --=-G'- ~I--'-~=\-:=C=_~~ '--I~~=~~~=~I=-==I~I= \-~~- ~~,- - - r _ 1=_= = 1_ I--=~I= ~E~~~~E~~:~~~~-;~~~~~~~s~~~g~ ~\-- f-/-'_ - '- I- 1-__ 1_ _I-+-_ ~~=_,-~_r-==-,- _ _ I_!===I~~I='-~~=I~:~ i=~ r- =C~I--;=:: - =\-;=:: ='- 1-1- 1='==1= ,-=:1==i=~== == =1\~:I'= ~~~'-_=\-f-,-=_I-,-- '- h-I=I_-'-I=J_1--=_ 1- ~r-_ I-~- -\-- \-==,_ 1_1- _ 1_ ~tl'- I-!='-c-==_~ _ I- 1=1!=~=~~q==\_~-=I~~ I-~ '-~I-r-EC=r-~-1- f-1===,_~i~=~~I='==14~ =~:==~\-:=-=c-:=-- -I-f-~=,_=I-I=I_~ = u'- ~U~-I-~~=c.:=~=- I- I-!==-I=~:~,-~-~I~h 1-4 -~'- '-I-~\-'_-I_ I_I=,-~I-\=\_\=I-==~-+-I- ~~I-C~\-f-C:::~ I-C- I-I-H=I=;=-\=\~='-==~~;= /-r~- f-)c:::"~LOPE~'- -SLOPE _1- --1= = ~~- f-~_ 9c= '- I- I=~- =L= = -I 1-4 ~~~~==F\-= '- 1-f-==~d=I=;=====ti= ~~~~~~:=~=f=E~'- ~-I=I-=\~9=~_=~~I= ~~I- f-~~ -~~ - I- I=!=~_I~- ,= c-If- f-~ f-~F~E=~\-~ f- 1-1-1-1-~e~=~=~==id:I~ F~I-~~I--I--=\-~-= I--I-=I-=I-i=f----~~- ~~f- f-r-_ 1-1-- 1_- f-I~_ I=l:::t~ - '- -~'- - - f- 1- - - 1-/= - = ---\=I::::I::I~ ~U - ~ '-=1- '- ~ I-,=,=,~R==,-I- -~)~I- 'f- I--r-_ f-r-_ 1-_1-11- _ 1--,= ~hl--==\-\-'-'-\-\-I-= I~-I=I--\-I~)-- _!=I_ ~I-- f-f-~~I-~=\-I- 1= I_I~ I=!=f- 1= f-~I- - =)_I~ =1-_1-\=1- ~~ f- '- =C~f--_ '- I-I-==-i-I~I=I-=I-I~-I= I-I'-\-- I- _ I- ,_I' ,__ ~r-,- 1-1-_ f-r- _ -~- 1- _ 1+1- f-~~ -k'- f-\-~ II-I~_ 1= _ I~~ ~~ '- ~ f-!=I- 1- - I-/=I=,=SH::!:I_ 1 ,/- - - I- \--1-- r- -p- 1- _1- 11- ~~\-~=~C~r-~~ I=I-'==I-\-=--'-H~ f=~~==~= f--,- I=~_ 1= _ I=p~ ~"-'- --~ -~I- 1- - 1-/= - '-i=b ,_ o E= =I--~~\-t= 1-;=,= ;:jCJ,= 1=:= ~=!d: t= , - I-I-~ f- 1- _'- 111- CHII~NEY.../ 1= I- -~'== f- /-- 1=1-- 1=- I=bi= i= r-C-f- -~I- 1- _ 1-/=_ '-!=~_ T'- - 1--1- I- - _1,_ -_I-i,- I=~r- - -SLOPE- -I--~\- 1=- =~I~~'_ _I-I=~= I=tt'- -~I- f-\-I_ 1='-- 1= - I=~~ f-bJ:: '- ~ -~I- 1= - 1-1- - -/=1--'- ~ - -),_ 1- 1_11- ~~~~=f=~~~~~ ~'-I=~~-I=I-~-l~= I=-):::!:~ =c.t=- _T- I_ = 1-_ 1=1--_ 1= == I:=:t::r -'-I-- -='-- 1=1=-- 1'-1--_ 1'-/= ~L~~= ~-_ ~ -~l-~ I~~~_ I-~~-~t=- ~\- 1- =1--1- I=I-l~ I~~ ~rf-=~r _r- 11-1__ I_I-- 1=1--_ I UNOCCUPlfD ROOF AFIOW o I ~ PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCIlE: 1/4"=1'-0" 19'-2" O~ :; M.....JJfQRQQM o ~ A !TIC ACCESS r - l PANEL~ 'x/ I l/ "':.0,] ~ I :0 I " , " , , , , , " " / / / // / / / /' / // / / , / OPF: :ll1F~ OW / "- / "- / "- / / / /' / / / /' / / / PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCIlE: 1/4"=1'-0" 7'-10", ON --04- i ~Q) r I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I --.J --l I l I l II II I I I n d I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. 17 109: I I I I I I I I BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suile l00c Brisb;:t4~~,!g~f5~8~~:tt~'5~1 ~005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 20 I 0 Ocean AVQ:lUC. SUilC D San Francisco, CA 94127 Td 415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT I DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-5 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 5 SHEET NO. -1 13 OF 21 SHEET~ STUCCO FINISH ~ TILE PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" JQ9r:.... _ 1.0:':0':'" _ _ _CQL~_ _ ~':.!!"_ _ _Ji! _ _ 11':.Q"__ _ _ _2/!.. _1':.Q" Wi:.. ~-.2.: J.F.r::.. ~.qo') GAi',^.!.CE _ -~' :.Q"jr L fl.QO') _ _ R.Q9r:.... _ J.O:.:o.:... _ _CQU~__2I:.!!" _ _Ji! _ _I1':.Q"__ ___2/!.._.2.':.Q" _ W.r:.._.rr-.2.:J.F.!::..~.l!!J') ~E_ -..r-jtiFL i?QO') B @ GARAGE -I' -0" IF] 47:DoT - [a PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0' BEST u DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIOl COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suit< IOOC Bris~~e4~~'!~~~f5~~'~~ttk.'65e6~1 ~5 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocenn Avenue, Suile D San Fmnciseo, CA 94127 Tel 415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 STUCCO FINISH TILE CONSTRUCTION OF I SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS B STUCCO FINISH EJ TILE 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, C B B DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT ED ta DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: KS m PROJ. NO.: 20415.3-5 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 5 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SHEET NO, -1 14 OF 21 SHEE 1 ." -u 1 II I r II I 1 II I I U .I II II ----- I I I I 1111 L II rr;::n.. I II~I II I II I I I I I II 1111 II I I III II II /SHINGLE ROOF / ~ ~1t-rNH II II III 11111;1 II I I I III Ulill III II I II ~ 11 I 1111111 ;111 II .1 J 11 U I L II I II 1\ IIII II I L I II I II I I 1 l l ~]h] U l11U l 1\ ~ I I III1 1 -If 11 U III II III I 11\ II I ll~~ I II I h-r-! W- ~ I I II T II I I I II II II I I ( I I T II I II II II II T II T T II I I III I III II II trtn n J I I III II 1III lp I I III / TLII II II / ; I I T II II T CHIMNEY ..J II II II II 1 l'f T --t H f- H ~ T II I I I ~ I III I I II II II' I II II II J l1L 1 I II II I II IIII ~II I II I I II I :1 'f II I II I II II I II II II I I II II I rill LI II I I I I I I r H . H;-I -I 1 III U J I IJ I I IJ II r I II I II III II 1--1 -H H I v- REDWOOD TRELLIS V PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" BJ] TILE PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" B EJB EJB PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" _ f!QO!:.. _ .]2.:.:!9" STUCCO FINISH STUCCO FINISH SHINGLE ROOF _ _JiE _ _11'~' EJ _ _ _2/i _1.'~'__ ca _ 9l~ _ o.::~ ~l.-=o.::~ ROQF _ _ l?'=-1D.::. _ STUCCO FINISH SHINGLE ROOF SHINGLE ROOF y!:.. .J9":':-~ _ _liF_ _9'::~ _ _ 9l~ _ o.::~ _ GABACE _ -=tL:/L PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" EJ 6J~ m m OJ TILE PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Sui'. I DOC Bris\~t4~~'1~~J5~~'f!:;tk~5~1 ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite D San Francisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: KS PROJ. NO.: 204153-6 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 6 SHEET NO. -1 16 OF 21 SHEETS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r .-J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I 91 :XI I I I L_ _ DINING ROOY !5.!:!Q!Et! 6.EOOQQ.i,! --, I I r- I I I I _J !:'6t!IRr ~ PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,_.-J I I I I I r AYII Y ROOY IAFOROOY ~ :;:; lli!B.i: UP ~ o I '-- PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCAlE; 1/4"=1'-0" D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE . 100 Old County Road, Suite 1 DOC Bnsb.;cle4~~'1r~f5~~'';::ttMilll ~1005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OmCE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite 0 San F rnneisco, CA 9-1127 Tcl415-452.8676 F"" 415-452.3476 o I :;:; I I I I I I I I I I L_ CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA r I I I I I I I I I DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT I I I I ....J DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-7 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 7 SHEET NO. -1 17 ()J:" ')1 C;HFFTS 11 III 111f1 II 1111 f-.II IllLJ[ II II 1111 111111 I r=~ l II -1r11 r 1r T ln IT 1 II 1=~""ll-"rLl..1 II .11 I1I11 w I I 111 F1=i~I-NI II II 1111 ~ II III 1111 f-\----lr-(=\--->t! II I r II II 'I 1111 II I=tt=):::;= I I II II II II II ---j-f-- _ d~;:~= ==r =r-:=-' =[J=~~= -h -Si:oPE-:= '=:f-' =r-r:=~ f- '-1 1--1-= Ft--' -I=;=r- H=(=f--'- -c- ~ = r- c:: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. =~~=2~;= I - ,~~r- I -<=;:\- \-I-(=\--, r= =q~I-=r-~1- I L____ =t~--t~= =h- '-=;=i---l- --1~C:::;=r-~== ::=!/-;=_~f-i= -l'-- -I-- '--T =1\-'-=::::: '- -1I--C = \-1-' C ~i=~_~h= I-- -,- ~ /--r '- E '- "):::r-~S~LOP pc- :~I--f--- H~ HI-~ I-~ f=1ft:::=:j=)::::= ~=~~ I ~t=r- . 1 ~ 1--:=<-.;= -:=f--I- - F==I--~I--= I-f---<= Ff',- f---c-'- f-F+;=c--L,= ~~-~-= -= ~- I~-'-I=~= =,l- = - = r- - -, = = ,:::: ~~I= 1--1--, = E:~R= = :=c......., - := ~ = - - --I-I- I-- - 1= '--T -~=--'-= -=-_~I-=I~=-_=I=II~ == -- - - = - - I-- - 'I-- '-r-;:---, - 1.- = '-- _ _-,_ -r=--\- =1---'- I- -ctr--'-f--r-~ =1--1-1=1--'- i='-I-IT= =~~~=:=~=\- -=\=-~~=I-=\-I+I- f=;=:: r- =5LOPF r-;=I= ~= =1-i-= -)=1- i= -l=~ = F==p::=-=r-r- -- ,---J=~i-=I-i=t=I=-'---l--i=1=- f=<--+ '-_ = =:=1-- ~_ = - :='= =I=~= '=\- 1-'--- -\=1::1::;= I-L 1---'- I-I-- - I-I-- - 1-' _ f=:=1:1 t::::= =::::: ~ c::- - =i=l- '-l==J= 1= I-/=C- - CIl-'--=t-1- = '-I=,::\-I-I=P_ 1=1=1::1:'- f--:=,-{::::::r-nL11- = -c f--- = _ I=~ - I-p- 1-I--J-(-1- 1= I--~- I-- - -~'-- 1-1-,- 1_ _\-I~f--- =S:_t:::=c=_ -=- -- C-=I-C-I=I-=-i=):::::~ - -,-- - - - = - = -i==.- ==r-._ --J--r - r- _f---I- r- - - - r- - = = I- =f--=e-/='- = --i= -:- = r-:=-:='--~""""=-:=-=- 1_- 1->--1~ 1_ ~-=- :=~=f--:='-=-='-- -_=_I--~-=_I-_---I-~_- I- :=::: _I--f--I- - '-1- -, I-- 1 I-I--r- ~I--I =~'- ,-==I==f--c- I- - ==f-- ______ -1--'-- g '-- -:='----='--1-'--=- =1-- -1-1=1- J~- T - f== ~ i==c- I--r- =- - -I-I- - 1-1::1:: '- I- '-\=\-1- - = -I- - - -;=.~ - '----;:::;- =j= tt = f---l::=r-~f--I~ c- =r--;= r- c- - !- = I-f--= ~I_ =--!=I: - := '---~I--;=f--:= -(=f-- ~ ~ = ,= I-- _-1-,= I-- _ 1_ 1--;-- j-,- =-_ r--/-,-- '- '--"=f--I- '-- = _ ,.. _ ,-- _ ,-, I := H=\-(=r= =r-(::r- = _ '- - -)= ~ - -1=1= ,= I=F ':: f--- +=\-~I--~ c-.~ '= c- ~ 1-1= ,- I-I=f--- l=r P: = CHIMNEY :=~~I--'-- :=1--5LOP~-f--- '-,-- 1=~R=I:::JLOP~I-I=~1= - V i=t:t=i==):::,:= =r-'-):::t- = -1--1=1=1- = 1_1-'=':= R-- r- F I--c- = -):::1-= I- - = 1=1= = =I=r= = -1= 8 ~~):::r:=;~ - =r:::~ - =\- = =F-=r= = =F-=::- = -i-= T = c-~~:=r-:==<=f--:=-=\- =,I-I=f-- 1_1-= ,:::;::- ~~):::~~~):::f=,= = -r:=; =1=1-~ -1=/== -I=b== := I--~'- -):::r- '-- =<= - ==J=i= ,- =1=1- =I-::t:- c~~:=c:====i==c:=~=-I-- ~~- 1-'-1- ==~~= ~ '-c- 1 I- _\-' -,-1-;:-1== 1- -= I-I-- - l-::r = j:::!=\-ci==c-cl-,= ~j::: :::::1_1=1=,==1-/=- I=~- :=1 I--~'-- ~I I- '--1-1-- = 1_ -~ =_- I-I=)::::=\-,-r-I-- - -\=1_1- I-,t= '-~I-- I-~= I--=\-I-I=r=,~ l-~ I--l-,-- 1=1-1_ I~ ~'---~~=r-c-_ ~\-I=~ r-~j:::~Fi=r-_=~~I=~,c f---~~ ~i=~ 1-f---::::JCrI-~iL ~~ ~~'-- 110- Ii ,-t--~):::p: l-rl= I=- r-c~R~~= I=~~=~~ I ~ I PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" 1 ~ , , , , , , , , , , / ~(, QEEtLlQJill.Q\' / / , , / " / , / , / , // ", / / / / UNOCCUPlfD ROOF 1111 ~ IT -I IT T1.7Ir= [ I I 1)::=::1= III II XI- I- II I ~ =\=:=t= ll:: - =1--1=::1'- _IlL -_1=1--11= ~I= ~ == = I=i=:f:= - '--I=1-'::::JI- I- - = =r='='-' ,= f-_ -i_'-I=lJ- 1='- = c- =.1-1=f-i= 1-,= r-= = -J=f=':::::;- Ft:- -p- 11- f- - -I--,I-I=: I- 1='-= I- =='1=>-'= 1-1= 1- -1=1-1--,- f-t: SLO~ 1-1-1-11_ f-,_ _ 1-\--,1-\= J- 1='-1= f- =='1=1-'= 1-1= 1= = 1==J=i= 1- t=1=,_ -'t=l- 1- [:1= 1-'- '=H-l= r-= 1-1= >- c-- I:::::{-I- 1- I:::::}..-I-I-.~l-\= / / DN )'~'V7~--------' I~I-n ~ I \L..Jill!j C I'\: - - 71 I I "x/ I I ~ "71 1/" I I "" .-=.. 1\ /1 IL__~ I ~ W Q II~x'J ,________.J llc ACCESS PANEL 1 ;:: L_ ~ L~ -=- .' ," PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCAlE: 1/4"-1'-0" r-- I : UNOCCUPIED DECK I I I ......... :--r-- -- -- ~ D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suite lDOC Bri,\~c4~~~~tf5~~'r::tt~'5~1 ~4005 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH omCE 2010 Occao Avenue:. Suite D San Fl1Ulcisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 4 15-452-3476 o 1 ~ CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS t:::::::i- m Ii I I I I Ii _J 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED 204153-7 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 7 SHEET NO. -1 18 OF 21 SHEETS STUCCO FiNISH ~~ PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4""1'-0" STUCCO ROOF PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" _ B!OI.E _ _ ~':Q"_ _CQl1~_ _E:l!"_ _JjJ _ _ J.2':l!"_ _ _ _21l _ 1':l!" _ _G!I. _ J?'::Ji"_ _ _ ~RAYC _ -:.Q'::Ji" _ B!DQ.E__ ~X:Q"_ _CQlI~_ _~.t::Ji" _ _ JjJ _ J.2' :l!"_ _ _21l _ 1':l!" _ _ ....91l_ ..Q':l!" _ _ ~~~ _ :Q':l!"__ STUCCO FINISH w w TILE PROPOSED EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"= l' -0" STUCCO FINISH @@ D ~ EJ[J PROPOSED WEST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Rood, Suite IOOC Brisbane: SbopPlOg Center. Bosbnoe. CA 94005 Tel 415-656"3528 Fax 415-656-44 16 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean AVO'lUe, Suite 0 San Fraocisco, CA 9-1127 Tel415-152"8676 Fax 415-152"3476 w w CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ~ 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: KS PROJ. NO.: 204153 -7 [8 DRAWING TITLE TILE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 7 SHEET NO. -1 19 OF 21 SHEErS 1 ;::; t=C=~~):::'-,-;==r--I-r-= ~f-;=1=i=~l=F:~~=I== \-:='-I:=_(::=i=:=r-~-t= ~ t=1--~r-=I-:=I--:='-=I-,- I--:=I-~-=I--I=I-=-I- '--I--;='--_:=I--~r-= '- \-I-I-=-_I--:=f-;=-t= t=1--~r-=-:=I--~'-=I-:='- 1-1= l= ~ '- = 1-(=1-:= r-.I- I- !--=-I-I--:=f-- '- \-t=~:=r-==:=I--I=~= t=l-~f-~-=I-(=I-=-t=1-- I--F=I-- ~ '- = -t= SLOPE::-- I- I--!--=r- I--:=\-- '-- f-i=~:=r-;==:=I-t=r-= (=f-~-'='-=r-~I-=_:='- 1-1=,---- 1-,-<- '-- '-==--I===r---- \-:=r==-==:=r-~-= t=1--i~ r- = -I =I--t='- = -t=~ I-:=I-~-=-I=I-<=-- '-_:=~-_=~:=r-- '- \- _1--1- - _ -r- r- r- ~-:=r-~-'=I-- '-=-t=~- - H=I--t='-=-~ ~-=~=Cf- I- 1-1--1- -_ -_,== _=l=~;==== ~-= ~I-,- =-:=\-1=-=- I-=_(=f---!- ==l=S~=== '-,-~~:==I- ~=)::::=:=~ l=== 1---,- ==:=\-1===1-- 1==1--(=1=- '- =l=t=1- = r-(= := r-.(=I-:= =\- =r- 1--'- '-/-- '-/--I- r- =):::'- 1= Ci= := c:; SLOPE I-- I- '-'-i=I--I--'-=1-- I--=r--I--- Ci=l=t=i=:=c::t= :=l=~=:=~\- =t:::.):::;=::=l=c::=. 1-r=~=I--'-1- '-~f-I-~~r- l=~I---I-'- I- i=:=f-I--i=~I--'- :=1--1-=:=,- '- ./-- I- I-r r- I- I-- _ I-- r-~I--~I-l=~~ l=1--,- 1--'-1- '-1--1--1--1-1--11- 1--,- ~):::,- /-- =[1C:: t;;::r-f=~1- H-C= I-- - =tIr-r- =;=Fl=:=~t=1-1- - '-/--- -1-- _I=C'- ;==:==_ -~-=I--'-I--= -L-!-= 1--1-== 1--_ =~==l=:=r-=t:::<= =~=-f=I--;=-:=r-_ -!,~=_I-'-= -p::=_-I--= I- _ =~ '- =t= -1='- =W-~ c: _r-'Si:OPE i- -IT,-=-I-I--- =f+=r-=I=,= - - -~,-I=-:=I--~-'- =H--~'-=I-(='-=I-- =1i;;==Et===f--- =f=FI--~=:=f-~-'- /-- =::I::I='-=-(='-=I-r- =:i:~:==~:==- _ =~I--:===I--~-'- - =+I='-=-t='-=I-,- ~:::t:t=:=c::~,--'=- r- i=::!::I-I-f=;=I--t='-'- '- ~-.ll-~~I--I--I--=I-I--' f=~E:=r=(=:'-'-L~= i==I-:=~I--t='-1-- '- I-- I- '- I-- _ I-- ~ --;- '-- - 1-1- - I-\-- I-t;:: - I---i- 1- =)-1-1- = '-1='- -1--1- 1-_1- r=~ 1-:= 1--1_ 1-1= I- _ 1-1-_ ~=I=)_ -1-\=l-=-\=)-=- _)- f-- ='=l-/= 1- =)_/=,-:= 1- ~i-= --t=!=-I-I= ~I=I--i= 1= I- - 1'- ~]- I-t: _'-1=/= 1= _ -1=1- _1-1=--_ 1___,_ =1= '=~~y=~!~:= =i=~:=II= I-~I- ~~f- I-~I- I-~ I- - 1- p- I-t: _1-1=/=_ ,_ -\= 1- -, -1=:>-:- 1___1_1- =t:.'=---'=/==-=I=~-= _=_ -=1-1-==[- =~ '-- r- _ 1_ r- _1-[=1--'_ = =1= 1- = -\=l- = -I=)-::='- _)- = - =l-I= - =)-t=:- = _ -1= _ _1=1- =,_1=1-= r- - _- -1-'-1-- --\=l----j 1_-=- '- = =:>-1='---'=)- =1-= - =1'=1-,- _1= =1= i= 1-_- I-t:-I-=/=- -=--- 1-- = _/=,- =l- ,= r- =1-1= 1--1= 1_ --1=)_=1- ---r==-= \-,_ = ,...-- ,- 1= I- =:'-1= I- = 1- = -SLOPE- =- I- -'/=1-- :_1--1_1-:= 1- 1'-- i= ='-1= i= = 1= _-1=l-_- /= ,- =l-/= 1- = 1-1-1=t=1= __ 1-1= i= -t=1== =~1= 1-1-,=,- -1-1=,- 1-\= I- [= 1--1_ 1- f--I_ 1-1-1= I- =1-1= [- :='-\= 1-1--- 1-1--- I-I-- 1-1-1= = =EI= = =E\= I-'-=r-=i-=,__ nl I=~=-I=~ =-I=::J ~ 1-1-- -=t=- -t=:- -=~_ -,---,1- 1-1-,= I- ~-:= r- ~r-l= 1=1-- = --;=1- = ---' =11-- 1-1-'= - =t='= - =::J'= I-- :-'::::;1- -=~I- I-~~PL,I-~=~\= =1'--Ei=J= ~E==-::::::I= _1-1- [=~ =_ >::: =1- 1-1-- 1-1-_-1= \=)- = - =>- '= - =l- -I_~:= = =1='- ==1= -1- 1=/=- 1-1-;-- 1--1=)- _ 1_1-_ 1_ _l-t= ,- =l- t=:- =:>- - -~;r=~~:=e~~ - =\=)-'= -1-)-- -1- --J-t= 1- =--t=:'- =__ - 1-1-1= =~'-=:== =1= 1-_ \=i=- 1=1-_'- 1=)- '-1=)-_ 1- PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/~.-1'-0. BEST D r DESIGN & I I CONSTRUCTION ATIiC ACCESS 1-------- -------- -, COMPANY t~L_ 26'-10" I r ------- -., I I I MAIN OFFICE 100 Old u>unty Road, Suit<: IllOC Tl 1 Brisb;:t4~~'!~tf5~rlF".:xB:I~~n5~1~4005 e.El2RQQ!L1J SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suile D San Francisco, CA 94121 Td 415-452-8616 Fax 4 15-452-3476 \!...JlEQRQQ.M ~ IlIQRQQ!L12 -;! .;! 0 ~ 0 1 n i:1 I I \ I I 0 I E!i!.[( ,. I <- I OINING ROOM UP I 1 I ~ I I I 1 I ~ I I I I ~ I L -----l I I I I I I I I CONSTRUCTION OF 8 I I I I SINGLE F AMIL Y I 0 I C IMNEY I 1 I N I DWELLINGS I I I I I I I I 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I 111 CHESTNUT AVE. I I SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA I I I I I ATTIC ACCESS I 1 /pmEL I I I DATE REVISION I I I ~ " I 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT I I 'x/ I I I 1/ ,I I I k-_..lJ I I I I ---, I I L ..J --- ------ PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0" DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO.: AS NOTED KS 204153-8 PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0. DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 8 SHEET NO. 20 OF 21 SHEETS DO PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 8J PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" DO STUCCO FINISH TILE STUCCO FINISH TILE U"p~R .JlQQF _ 2.!.":1" _ _ L9~R.JlQQF_~:Q"_ _ .J:f!I"!Q _ ?Q'~"_ - _ A!.. ~'~"_ - _ _c(f: _ J.'::!t JF! 46JJ') _ SAliAg; _ .Q':Q"JF! 45J.J') U"p~R.JlClQF _ 2I:1" _ L9~R.JlQQF _ ~:Q" .J:f!I"!Q _ ?Q'~"__ y~ - ~'~"- - C/F J.':Q" _(f/.: 46.3J') _~J; _ .Q':Q"_(~.F.: 45.JJ') D BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Sui", IOOC Brisbane Shopping Center, Brisbane. CA 94005 Tel 415-656-3528 Fa< 415-6564116 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocaw Avenue, SuilC D San F ...nei=>, CA 94127 Tel415-452-8616 Fax 415-452-H16 PROPOSED FRONT ELEV A TION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" STUCCO FINISH CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT EJ DRAWING TITLE DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO,: AS NOTED KS 204153-8 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNIT 8 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCAlE: 1/4"=1'-0" SHEET NO. 1 ! 1 nr 71 6' -0" H WOOD PERIMETER FENCE, SEE DET. 10' -0" -0 I -0 ~~~~~~~ [!jJ ~ -co I -N " \// o I -0 STORM FILTER NOTE, IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGN &. BUILT BY LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR SHRUB SPRAY IlEAD SIDEWAlK, CURB, ETC 1 POINT OF CONNECTION. STUB OUT 15 PROVIDED FOR AT GATE VALVE IN ANOTHER SECTION OF CONTRACT 2 SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 57 G.P.M. AT 55 PSI STATIC PRESSURE. SET PRESSURE REGULATOR AT 65 P.S.1. .I INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEViCE APPROXII.IATELY WHERE INDICATED AND ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODES. 4 CONTROLLER LOCATION APPROXII.IATE. EXACT LOCATION SITE 110 VOLT ELECTRICAl OUTLET IS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION OF CONTRACT. lAAOSCAPE CONTPACTOR TO 5. USE PRIMER DURING I.IAINLlNE PIPE INSTAlLATION 6 HOUSE CONTROL VALVES, QUICK COUPLING VALVES, AND RECTANGUlAR PLASTIC BOX WITH BOLT OOWIJ LID. SET FINISH GRAOE. PLACE DRAIN ROCK UNDER CONTROL .I INCH CLEARANCE UNDER VAlVE. QUICK COUPLING PVC SCHEDULE SO NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 40 THREADED IRRIGATION LINE FLEXIBLE PVC NIPPLE P'vC TEE OR 906 ELBOW (2-'\ pop-up SPRAY HEAD RISER :;-----) ._._..------~- . - / ASSFMRI y nFT All SEE PLAN 16'-.16- H MEDIUM- EVERGREEN 110 IS' W 5 CALLON 6" 10" SEE PLAN 6'-10' H MEDIUM/ EVERGREEN 14 .16' -4S- W RAPID 5 GALLON 24 4' 12' II MEDIUM/ EVERGREEN 74 .1'-5' W RAPID SEE PLAN 6'-12- H MEDIUM EVERGREEN IDS 24' -.16" W CONCRETE mGAmtu:ru:~ \l SPRN<LER ItAO ~ BACKFLOW PREVENTER IM)l SPRN<LER LN: [j] ~----- e::3 CONTROl BOX ( LANDSCAPE PLAN S;A:::::r:OTES 5 ~ CONSTRUCT BASINS AS NECESSARY PLANTS REMOVE BASINS' FRQV PLANTS UNDER A SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM FINAL INSPECTION AND FINISH THE PLANTING AREA BASINS FOR PLANTS TO HAND WATERED OR BUBBLER IRRIGATED REI.IAIN IN PLACE. BASIN BOTTOMS SHALL DRAIN TO BERV AWAY FROM PLANT STEM 6. ~ AFTER COVPLETION OF AlL OPERATIONS, EXCESS OIl. AND OTHER DEBRIS. ALL WALKS, W,\LLS, WASHED CLEAN, LEAVING THE ENTIRE AREA III A NEAT, REMOVE AlL TRASH, BE SWEPT AND 10 OR IRIGATlON sYSTEM USIIiG 5lCrPE AT 2A l.,1INlMUM AWAY FROU BUILDING AU ..\ 2" 3/'- BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road, Suite IOOC Brisbane Shopping Center, Brisbane, CA 94005 Tel 415-656-3528 FlU 415-656-1416 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE, UNIT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DArE SCALE AS NOTED KS 204153- DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO. DRAWING TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO Residence Loc.;t.tion: Ad01.nu. GA Dimen~ion'S: 6-16 f~( high, 100 Iin-e..r f~t In\tAlled: 1984 P<tnel width: 11 feet .and 8 feet to the horne :l noiH~ b;trr;cr" W-:'H to n..>duee the noi\.e: level for the occup;tnt\. Thi, 1\ the oldcH PlY"VALL~i; b;tfTicr and ;l\. \uch dcmonnr:HC1. the tre;au~nt'\ TI1cre i.. no dC(l'f"IOn!ton at line. which i\ tnc ;lreJ of \cvcreH decty :lnd ten-nite Dottlins Plant Loc,1.don H.lnchc'iter, NH Dimensions: 15 re~t high, .(ao linc.lr fet':( Imt....lled: 1988 P:a.nel width: Wood 154 Wire. RO.ld . rhom\on. Georgia lOOH Toll Free 1.800-531.5558 . Direct: (706) 595-12&4 . Fax (706) 595.8462 W'.VWplyv..rall.com . e..m.1d: plyv.':tll@fnw,com SOUND BARRIER NTS o ;" Hoover Tno:.;a,ted Wood Pnxiucu. Inc. 1\ one of the brgc'it producer'!. of U"c,ned wood prodtJcu in North Amerio.. \peci.Jli=:ing In .;o",ernmcnt ~p~cif'CJ(ion.., high retention\.. .1nd tre:HfTlent of pltwood. Uukring KIln Drying Aftcf" Tre:lUnenc (KDAn. Hoover producet wood pf"OdUCLt tN.t .1f"C Hronger.lightcr. and pn:-\hrunk. CCA. th~ clea/1 pre\(~r."::ltIve choice for over &0 rear>. is u..cd by Hoover beou'.c of it.. hi\toriol menul qUJ.!ities. Jnd economy. Hoover IS aha -l supplier of ,A.CQ !,rcued .....ood producu. Hoover engine en Jnd hOnc.Hc> "r\tCfTI\ lor none -lb:1tl~. ment Jnd lCHhctic t;crecning for -l rnulutud~ tested in J.ccord.lflCc with ASTH E.90 Jnd our lO concrete ]nd rnHOnrr Designed for \tJ.ndMd cruck shIpment (included in price). f'lYV/ALL:9 on eHity be delivered Jnd \In- IOJ.ded on site. with in\t.J.llJtlon being Jccomph\hed by 1001 contncton or mJintenJ.nce crL'"W\ r:t (wi r POsn 'If 54' <1&1, 8 REFERENCE: www.alumi-guard.com DETAIL OR APPROVED N.T.S SPRO, VESPRO, INC. 40 BELVEDERE ST., SUITE 2 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 TOLL FREE: 1-800-554-0914 PHONE:(415) 434-3072 FAX:(415) 459-4038 www.vesproinc.com INC. NEW OR EXISTING TREE --CONCRETE SIDEWALK GRAGE BACKFill NTS SECTION .--RS-24 ROOT BARRIER NATIVE MATERiAl BACKFill NTS SECTION 1iQlli; 1. INSTAlLATION TO BE COMPlETEO IN ACCORDANCE WITH WMJFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCAlE DRAWINGS. 3. THE RAISED ROOT GUID(NG RiBS MUST BE FACING TOWARDS THE TREE ROOTS. 4. THE TOP OF THE BARRIER PANELS MUST BE SUGHTL Y ABOVE GRAGE (NEVER BELOW GRADE). 5. POSITION BARRIER PANELS VERTICAlLY WITH TOP AGAINST THE STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED. 6. SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN TO DETERMINE TREES THAT REQUIRE BARRIER PANa 5. CONTRACTORS NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORW.TlON V\SIT www.CADdetais.com.nb REFERENCE NUfIBER 072-004 LINEAR PLACEMENT fiQlL DEEPER FOOTING UAY 8E REOUIRED 8Y THE CITY N.T.S [4\_4 ~NTS L 2 TlUES I CDNTAINER DIAUETER.---;C SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TREE TIE 10 O.C TO (6"\ DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT DETAIL ~-7"~~"-.""-~~"'~~---'--~~-------""'~~---- I ".. / BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE 100 Old County Road. Suite IOOC Brisbane Shopping Center, Bnsbanc; CA 94005 Tcl415-656.3528 Fax415.656-4416 CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGs 111 CHESTNUT AVE. UNIT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE REVISION 9/2007 SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DATE: SCALE AS f,OTED DRAWfJ BY: KN PROJ. NO.. 204153- DRAWING TITLE DET AILS SHEET NO. OWNERS' STATEMENT: THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE PARTIES HAVING COME RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DELINEATED AND EMBRACED W1THIN THE BOUNDARY LINES UPON THIS MAP ENTITLE "111 CHESTNUT AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA" AND DESCRIBED IN RECORDER'S SERIES 2007-073330, RECORDED MAY 11, 2007, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS, DO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION, WE HEREBY DEDICATE AS COMMON AREA THAT AREA SHOWN AS LOT A ON SAID MAP FOR THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS/EGRESS, PARKING, PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING GAS, ELECTRIC, COMMUNICATIONS) PRIVATE SANITARY SEWERS, PRIVATE STORM DRAINS, PRIVATE WATER LINES, AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OWNERS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO THE AREA SHOWN ON SAID MAP AS "p,U.C OR PUBLIC UllLlTY EASEMENT AS A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC UTILlllES, UNITED NG'S Ut.1ITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST; AND NG'S CHESTNUT LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST. . UNITED NG'S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CHARLES NG NG'S CHESTNUT LLC CHARLES NG OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA) ON I 200_, BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PERSONALLY APPEARED ___----< PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SAllSFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TOME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACIllES, AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNAlURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S) OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT, W1TNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. NOTARy'S SIGNAlURE PRINTED NAME PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS COUNTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ON I 200-0 BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACIllES, AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNAlURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S) OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. W1TNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. NOTARy'S SIGNA lURE PRINTED NOTARy'S NAME PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS COUNTY 5461 TRUSTEE STATEMENT: THE UNDERSIGNED CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2004, SERIES NO. 2004-008672 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY JOIN IN AND CONSENT TO THE FOREGOING OWNER'S STATEMENT AND ALL DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY: TITLE: TRUSTEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO) ON , 200~ BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PERSONALLY APPEARED I PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITlES, AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNA lURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S) OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS COUNTY NOTARy'S S1GNAlURE PRINTED NOTARY'S NAME EXPIRATION OF NOTARy'S COMMISSION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NOTE: A SOILS REPORT COVERING THE LAND WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBDIVISION WAS PREPARED BY ALDINE/GLOBE SOIL ENGINEERS, 41 SUrfER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 BEARING THE DATED OF NOVEMBER 1, 2003. CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT: I, SYlVIA M. PAYNE, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SAID COUNCIL HELD ON THE _ DAY OF 200_, AND THAT SAID COUNCIL DID ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE DEDICATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC USE, SYlVIA M. PAYNE, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DATED TECHNICAL REVIEWER'S STATEMENl: I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT THE MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA "SUBDIVISION MAP ACT" PRINTED NAME CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RCE NO,___ LICENSE EXPIRES___ CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE HEREIN FINAL MAP OF "111 CHESTNUT AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . THAT THE SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THERtOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AS AMENDED, AND OF ANY LOCAL ORDINANCE APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED W1TH. PRINTED NAME CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RCE NO._~, LICENSE EXPIRES___ COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT: FILE NO. ___ FEt_____ FILED FOR RECORD THIS _ DAY OF 200__ AT _ IN BOOK OF MAPS AT PAGES RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF SYLVIA M, PAYNE, CITY CLERK OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. DEPUTY RECORDER SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: THIS SURVEY AND FINAL.. MAP WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, THE SURVEY WAS MADE DURING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2007, AND IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN; ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF A CHARACTER AND OCCUpy THE POSITlONS INDICATED, OR WILL BE SET IN SUOH POSIllONS ON OR BEFORE TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF RECORDATION OF THIS MAP, AND SUCH MONUMENTS ARE OR WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, PETER J. BEKEY RCE NO. 14786 EXPIRATION: 3/31/2009 DATED TEN E MAP BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 BLOCK 312 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT GRANT DEED DOCUMENT NUMBER 2007-073330 RECORDED ON MAY 11, 2007 OFFICIAL RECORDS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA I CONSULTiNG CIVIL ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2007 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS LJ.J Z ::i ,~aO: 0):::Eu.. f") 0 (/)FI- -'::::l(/)CO '-"'ObLIO) t!)(/)::;!:::::E ~1<->N 0.. OC!I"?f") u..OOU? / I.JJ Z ::i aa5 :::lEu.. o 5t1co ;:,co~O) ~~. ii: ~"<tf") e ~ ~ ~ N 74'27'00" W -T-----------140~00'----------r-- 40,OO'-T--- CENTERLlNE--- i~ ~!' FD TAG (LS 3918) 'I~ ~: 'I 0.02' NORTH MON LINE (GRAND) LINE I , 0.24' WEST OF PL (CHESTNUT) I 53 PM 98 i i + G--- ! FD TAG (LS 3918) i ~ON PL I i 6.77' EAST ?F R/W I I 53 PM 98 I ! FD TAG (LS 13918) I ON MON LINE (BADEN) I 0.38' WEST OF MON UNE 55 I 53 98 r-: C'J "<t G D NUE a o r-: R = 27.50' L = 25,10' A = 5218'00" DEN PARCEL B 62 PM 67 SET N & T RCE 14786 I i 1 II.JJ:-, I FD TAG (LS 3918) -' I ON PL I 6.75' EAST , z ! 53 PM 98 I~ I 'IZ ' ~ ! FD "L" CUT I ~ 0.06' NORTH OF I='L I i 14.57' EAST OF R/W , ~~..9.9~~ NO REFERENfE , W i 7.00 ::J !~ :z II- I~ i~ Il- ia IL() I~ I.... il.JJ I~ !;;) i~ Iz i ~7'~~'___~ ~ i , FD "L" CUT 0.09' NORTH OF PL 14.51' EAST OF R/W NO REFERENCE OAK 1,32 M :s a f") d , "<t 1<->1._.... fJ ~'I~ r--. ~ ;::!,!;;j:: ~ ~ Ig .n I.JJ , ~ CD I.JJI :::El:s'b' '" 0 I I"') !::2 1<-> (C) .... (/) f")' ~ ~ !17,59' Z I.,....., .u 11c;' J~ FD. MON , 0,01' NORTH / 132 M 26/ / /' ''--., _..-/' --~ R = 48.50' L = 108,10' A = 127"42'00" LOT 9 DOC. NO, 2007-073330 S 74'27'00" E 159.B1'(M) S 74"27'00" E(D) 160'(D) ,....., ,.....,:::E 0::-' .........0 a~ L()", ~:'! ,....., u ,....., ::-' 0 0......... U? · . to ~ .1 ....N :'! SEE SHEET NUMBER 3 FOR LOT DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS ETC. ,....., 0,....., 3E':::E .3E' o f;~ r>':q- U?f") ....i:n U') .... U') ,....., ,....., 0 Sw I.JJ . . 0 00 f;~ r>L() U? .... ....z Z N 74'27'00" W(D) 160'(0) N 74'27'00" W 159,75'(M) LOT 12 DOC NO. 2004-122972 SET N & T LOT 10 RCE 14786 DOC NO, 2003-035963 LOT 11 DOC NO, 2007-093790 E ENUE 5461 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 80 160 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 Il NUE TE E MAP 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 BLOCK 312 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT GRANT DEED DOCUMENT NUMBER 2007-073330 RECORDED ON MAY 11, 2007 OFFICIAL RECORDS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA I CONSUL TlNG CIVIL ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2007 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS 5451 r-.. <0 r..: I"') o L() t"l -.r w b o irJ !,"') L() Z r-.. <0 r..: I"') 10.00' 10.00' 37,00' YE-5 S 74'27'00. E 19,17' S 15'33'00. W-/ 4,00' S 74'27'00. E-/ 7,83' r-.. <0 r..: C'-l in I'-. cO -.r w N 74'27'00. W 6.00' --...., I . ~ LOT 5 b 1.145.43 Sq. Ft. Below Elev 56.0 Z N 74'27'00. W 21.00' S 74'27'00. E 21.00' ~ LOT 4 :; 1.145.43 Sq. Ft. Elev, 56.0 & above I S 74'27'00. E-/ 6.00' . o o i0 I"') to Z N 74'27'00. W 7.83.--.... S 15'33'00. W ' 4 00' -.... \ , " N 74'27'00. W 19,17' YE-4 37.00' ..{. I ~ 0 <(f;j ~ 1 Ir-.. <0 r..: N I I '0 I.!':! N ;s:: b 1;; 6,00' t"'l L() UJ o o i1 6,Qif-t ~ AE-5 ;s:: b o i0 ~ UJ 'in N r<i N ;s:: . o o i0 ~ J AE-4 5,oo.-tl o o L!'i o I.!':! N '0 ;s:: 6.00' ~ C'-l b o i0 t"'l ~ UJ r-.. <0 t"l C'-l w 33.50' YE-6 S 74'27'00. E 19,67' S 15'33'00. wi 3.00' I S 74'27'00. Ej 7,83' S 74'27'000 E 20.67' r-.. <0 ~ ;s:: . o o i0 t"'l ~ to o to ~I L() LO 0) ~oi~ ;s:: 4.5Qj AE-6 . o o 'i"l t"'l ~ UJ 159.81' ?()\~\ 'Or; 27.00' YE-7 S 74'27'00" E 21.00' o L() ~ w . o o i0 I"') to N 74'27'00. W / N 74'27'00. W 4.50'-..., UJ / 2,00' \ LOT 6 o 1,030.44 Sq. Ft. d Below Elev 56.0 C'-l w Z . o o 'i"l t"'l ~ Z N 74'27'00" W 21.00' w S 74'27'00. E 21.00' ;s:: o o L!'i . o o i0 !,"') ~ N 74'27'00. W z....-1.50. or:; , /0 LOT 7 ~ I 7,00 ~ 1,059.52 Sq. Ft, wi w Below Elev 56.0 ~I AE-7 ~ t"'l t"'l ~ uoo' ~ Z Z \"'-S 74'27'00. E o 2,50' ~ c;;j w N 74'27'00. W 0,67'-..., b o i0 !,"') ~ Z N 74'27'00. W 21.33' COMMON AREA PARCEL 14,149.35 Sq, Ft. = . go go 'i"lo 3' 0 b~ ~~.4.~AE-3 .... 960.50 Sq. Ft..... ~ 0 Z Below Elev 56,0 UJ I'-. ~ S 74'27'00. E \'- 2.00' I S 74'27'00. E-/ 4.50' w 1G~1G~ t"lO)t"l<O w;S::==== bbbb .oR.oR F5~F5~ ~I'-.~I'-. ZUJZ I I \ \ \ -..... \ \ I .... . o 1;:;1;; r..:!,"') .-~ Z N 74'27'00. W 12.50' YE-3 33.50' S 74'27'00. E 21,33' 'in N r..: l:: c.c5 C'-l w . o o 'i"l !,"') L() S 74'27'00. E I 5.50' _/ ,r-N 74'27'00" W AE -2 ~oo' / 2.00' 1~<3~00: ~ LOT 2 co1.2S',.o'in 1,180.68 Sq. Ft. '4,00' i F5 ~ Below Elev 56.0 l2; /~ g r<i N ;s:: b o i0 t"'l ~ UJ Z IZ w'....-s 74'27'00" E b. 2,00' 01"') 1:i~ L() .- o . LO I'-. d Cl:! I"') .... N 3= r-.. <0 ~12 ui C'-l w . . 0 0 0 0 i0 i0 I"') ~ t"'l 6,00' ~ UJ Z o LO d N 3= b o i0 I"') ~ UJ == . o o irJ !,"') ~ en N Cf) t"l C'-l ;s:: 6.00' = o o 'i"l. 1"')0> , LO ~..q: UJ'- S 74'27'00. E 2.08'-.... S 15'33'00" W 3.33' -......\.... N 74'27'00. W 2.08' --::::::- S 15'33'00" W 4.25'-" N 74'27'00" W 26,83' ... Z I! YE-2 26,83' 19,67' N 74'27'00. W 159.75' I~ 26,83' YE-8 ,,0 . ~4'/, ~ I ;s,.. co S 74'27'00. E 26,83' . gi0 ~~ to'- N 74'27'00. W 2,50' --...~ == " LOT 8 1,043.28 Sq, Ft. Below Elev 54,8 N 74'27'00. W en --550' / /. S 74'27'00. E-.... 2,50' ~ c;;j ':.r I"') ~ w . o o i0 !,"') ~ Z N 74'27'00. W 21.33' S 74'27'00" E 21.33' to ~ c;;j w b o irJ !,"') ~ Z N 74'27'00" W 1.00'-... , \'- S 74'27'00. E 0,67' l:: LOT 1 ~ 1,085.37 Sq. Ft. w Below Elev 55.5 UJ S 74'27'00. E 1.00' . . 0 I'-. 0 """:r-.., ~ ~ Z N 74'27'00. W 22,00' YE-1 28,00' .. ..~ . ~ 01 Q,~ :;j == I I I 10.00' 1 P.U,E. I 10.50,11 I I I ~I AE -r ; I ~ I ~I ~ ~I ~ I I 8.ob' J I" I I I I 10. 00' P.U.E. == I I I aot'l I I I i01 I ~I AE J1 ~ 1 I ~I I zl I I ~-1 I I 1 I I I . o. 0.... 1;5~ toC'-l UJ ;s:: gr-.. ~ 'i"l <.C! r..: 1"')0 to'- b. 01'-. 1;5; to.... en GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 ( :IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 it. o L() t"l -.r NOTES: 1. AREAS DESIGNATED YE-1, YE-2. ETC, ARE YARD EASEMENTS. AN EASEMENT FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF SAID YARD EASEMENT WILL BE GRANTED AS AN APPURTENANT TO THE LIKE NUMBERED LOT. THE VERllCAL LIMITS OF THE YARD EASEMENTS IS FROM THE GROUND SURFACE TO THE UPPER ELEVAllON FOR THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE RESPECTIVE UNIT AS SHOWN ON SHEET 3 OF THE MAP, 2, AREAS DESIGNATED AE-1. AE-2, ETC, ARE ACCESS EASEMENTS. AN EASEMENT FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF SAID ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE GRANTED AS AN APPURTENANT TO THE LIKE NUMBERED LOT, THE VERTICAL LIMITS OF THE ACCESS EASEMENTS IS FROM THE GROUND SURFACE TO THE UPPER ELEVAllON FOR THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE RESPECTIVE UNIT AS SHOWN ON SHEET 3 OF THE MAP, == . <0 C'-l ':.r !,"') ~ UJ TEN MAP 10.00' P.U,E. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 BLOCK 312 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT GR'ANT DEED DOCUMENT NUMBER 2007-073330 RECORDED ON MAY 11, 2007 OFFICIAL RECORDS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2007 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS i<') I<) c:i \ $ 74'27'00" E I -0.33' 19.83' Jk~ I ~:<..~x. I i $"",~ \ , q,'V' \ / $ 15'33'00" W 2.83,j / S 74'27'00" E 9.00,j '-$ 74'27'00" E 1.17' w . ~~ ~r<) ~- z ~~~ 'in c)r<)O " ww3: ~ 'b'bb w R.;;:;R o f"J~f'J ~ ~~~ !:'" (/)ZZ I1'l \, I - I I I :z II"':~,,<//I : r r-;:- 11180 i!lo)~ 15'0 )/IWI1'l. tri~ :/ ). 3: 8 :;l:: 'b :;l:: ~ --" .?5 b N 0 I<)OW . bNb 3: f;;~b :2';;:; R '8 ;;~.;;:;t5~?5f;; ~~ ''-J z f;; ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~ /__1 ;; & ~ ~ \ \ (/) -"I \ ' \ LOT 5 1,479.79 Sq. Ft. g Elev. 56.0 & above ~ in N 74'27'00" W_ 6,00' '\ \,/-N 01'56'32" W(R) \ \ 1 I- I ... I ' \ ...- $ 33'02'32" W(R) \ ~s 01'56'32" E(R) I \1 N 33'02'32" E(R)~I \ 1 I I I . '...., 8.1. ~ woN:;5g?3 ... 'b~~c;j~;;; \~ 8&~~ \~ ~ '... I" in ......"", \ (/) or- "......\ z \,::;:---N 15'33'00" E b S'j 9.00' . ~ ~~ ~3:wc) <Ci. 'bw "'00. wR1:i~ 8~~~ 1:i~z~ in (/) " I :;l::'O . C! ON o o t'"l in (f) ''0 II1'l ~ ~ tri :;l:: W'b 'b 0 oi<') r-.. !:'" S'l I1'l .q- " (/) (/) $ 74'27'00" E _../ 6.00' LOT 4 1,479.79 Sq. Ft. Elev. 56.0 & above z 12~ NO) 3::;l:: /,-N 74'27'00" W 1.17' W 'b. 01<) ~:::J ~- z .1 I"') I"') c) 5461 W '8n n!X) ~;:: z S 74'27'00" E I 20,33' r S 15'33'00" W 1.83'/ ,,/ S 74'27'00" E 9.00' _.<~J:,< <$-~ o.~ ~ \ -1.50' 1::: a:i N :;l:: ,_......- S 74'27'00" E w 1.17' 'in '" ..t I"') 3: = 8r-.. r."oc-; t'"l eo in- LOT 6 1,294.64 Sq. Ft. Elev, 56.0 & above = o o ;..., !:'" ~ (f) (/) :z N 74'27'00" W 6,00", _- N 74'27'00" W r-.. \ - / 2,00' . <Ci \ ;...,12~3: \ 8~o !X) .0= ....:.....q 0);:w8 -3:1"') 3:3:. ;..., w= w bb~f;;/ b~b 00".....' .e~.P ~;...,~(/)J I .- J, t'"l :q. f;;" '- / f;;~!:'" " " ..... ~ R=18,50' z ~ u:!_./' 7 L=12,22' ,,->----- _,./(!::l.=37'50'57" '\ '... I I \ /--, 'I- I ' \ \- N 03'22'29" W(R) l_s 34'28'29" W(R) ;..., I"') 9 ... ') S 74'27'00" E ... \ ~ "", \. 14,00' W "":\'..0(2 "'/, ---::' '-~\ '" ~)- \90L.- t'"l w . 8'b:;;: "I b,,~<" ~ b S I<)qw Wi<? w.P !:"'.q-= = 00 t'"l ~ ~8 8 ~ 8 ~ z i---;..., r-.. - S'l !:'" S'l z .q- I1'l .q- " - " \ (f) Z (/) "'-$ 74'27'00" E w 2.00' LOT 7 1,520.87 Sq. Ft. Elev. 56.0 & above 1.50' i<? IX! r;:; w b o i<? !:'" I1'l ,,- I 1 I J S 15'33'00" W j 15.33' S 74'27'00" E-/ tOO' 'b o 0) I"') 3: GRAPHIC SCALE 10 10 20 40 b o i<') !:'" ~ Z . o. 00 8~ 11'l- ;; /_ N 74'30'00" W 2,00' /' $ 74'27'00" E 0.50' --_ / $ 15'33'00" W 3,50' --_ " N 74'27'00. W 0.50' --_ ..., \ S 15'33'00" W 7,00' -... \ \ N7""7' " ,\\1\ . 4 .l. 00 W 1.50 -\ \ \ I I r-.. ~iDtoi<?r-.. \\/\( ~ ~~lC!~--: 11\- N ~ N 0 I"') :;l:: I,...., w w 3:3:3: . 1\ . b;=bbb ~8 1\ ~ ~ ~ ~ .;;:; b ~, ;'-eo ~ ~ \.....,... '- t'"l R--27.99' in ~ r:: !:"':; 'J ~ l1'lo \ ~ - .q- eo ~" ~ fr If ~:d :z L=12.80' Z ~ :::;: ~ ~ O::...J <J .....___ N 74'27'00" W .6=26'12'26"-, ''-.\ \.......-':::.-?-.::,... \.....-, 12,65' 1....-) 1 \ , ' \ f.., \--, .-{ r-\ ,I '[ \ \N 0~'32B~~::4~"R W(R) j! N 00'11'19" E(R)) \ "'S 39'44'52" W(R) ( ) ( IN FEET ) 1 inch == 10 fl (/) /- N 74'27'00" W / 5.50' r-.. eo u:i I<) LOT 8 1,534.06 Sq. Ft, Elev. 54,8 & above 3: b o i<? !:'" I1'l (/) NOTE: 1. SEE SHEET 3 FOR HORIZONTAL TIES FOR THE LOCATION OF POINTS MARKED "DIR (DIRECTLY) ABOVE POINT xx" COMMON AREA PARCEL \ -$ 00'50'43" W(R) I V( N 30'15'17. E(R) --/ \ , S 74'27'0,0" E R=30.53'-/ 12.17 l=15,67' / o 1 ~ .6=29'24'34" / / '" S 15'33'00" W 4.50') / w S 74'27'00" E 0.33'-" / S 15'33'00" W 9.00'j 'in N ..t I"') 3: . o o i<? f;; S 74'27'00" E 2.50'-/ Z 0 ,,/- N 74'27'00" W 1,17' ~ I N I . o o i<? !:'" ~ (/) LOT 3 1,315.16 Sq. Ft. Elev, 56,0 & above b o ;..., !:'" I1'l 3: ;..., '0 I1'l I"') a:i 0) 3: w = b 0 0 0 r-.. i<? S'l t'"l .q- in " Z Z I I I o o (f) tri N 74'27'00" W 1.50'-,- w $ 15'33'00" W- ' 'b , . "\ ~ 7.17 ~\ !:'" 0 ~ OIl? ABOlfl /- S 74'27'00" E Z PoiNT "C" \ 0.33' , 0,33'----_ / /1 S 15'33'00" W 5.66''::::_ 74'27'00" W 19.66' \ ....- S 00'20'26" E(R) " ,.-N 31'26'26" E(R) 'r/ ;J \ 1 \ ... S 74'27'00" E , 'R=26,17' 14,00' " L=14.52' I \ \ \ !::l.=31 '46'52. " "'-N 15'33'00. E 3.50' ~ \-S 74'27'00. E 1,50' o. 00 8~ ~- N 34'59'59" E(R) -', / y S 74'27'00" E 20.66' 1 R=17,52'-/ L=5.95' .6=19'26'59" 'b o t<) N 3: / I ! to - ,,-~ 0)1 3:~~ LOT 1 8 : ~ 1,441.82 Sq. Ft. i<? 3: Elev. 55.5 & above f;; 8 'b ~r-..O (/)~1:i "in N 74'27'00" W (/) ..... 1.50' --_,~ . o o 'to') !:'" ~ Z (/) \ N 74'27'00" W 1.1t.,- w...-s 74'27'00. E 2,00' \ 'in '" ..t I1'l W = 80 ~~ ~..... LOT 2 1,569,78 Sq, Ft. Elev. 56.0 & above . o o i<') I"') in 1::: N N 3: S 15'33'00. W 9.67' --, '- N 74'27'00" W - 1.50' --_....... 3:: Z / N 74'27'00. W 3.17' I MAP Z 00 I1'l ....: '0 o i<? t"1 ~ S 74'27'00. E 1.75'--_ (f) S 15'33'00. W 3.33'- " N 74'27'00. W 1.75'-~'... \ $ 15'33'00" W 4.58'-->:'':..:'_ D4p \' ,oo~ 4S0tt, N 74'27'00" W 27.49' r;so<o 0.33' -1. 50' 1': II = o. 0" 1:i;'ri ~~ w BEING A SUBDIVISION OF, LOT 9 BLOCK 312 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT GRANT DEED DOCUMENT NUMBER 2007-073330 RECORDED ON MAY 11, 2007 OFFICIAL RECORDS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO . o o ;..., !:'" I1'l D4p ,oo~:~o;;' N 74'27'00. W 25.00,4" .... CALIFORNIA :z I . I I"') I"') c:i .' o ~ I CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2007 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS ~ II) S IZ>HT KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE INDEX OF DRAWINGS CO.O VICINITY MAP, INDEX OF DRAWINGS AND NOTES CO.l SITE PLAN, ABBREVIATIONS AND LEGEND C1.1 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN, SHEET 1 OF 2 Cl.2 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN, SHEET 2 OF 2 C2,l SITE GRADING PLAN, SHEET 1 OF 2 C2.2 SITE GRADING PLAN, SHEET 2 OF 2 C3.0 MASTER UTILITY PLAN, SHEET 1 OF 1 C3.1 SITE UTILITY PLAN, SHEET 1 OF 4 C3.2 SITE UTILITY PLAN, SHEET 2 OF 4 C3.3 SITE UTILITY PLAN, SHEET 3 OF 4 C3.4 SITE UTILITY PLAN, SHEET 4 OF 4 C4.1 STANDARD DETAILS, SHEET 1 OF 2 C4.2 STANDARD DETAILS, SHEET 2 OF 2 C5.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS C5.2 STOPPP'S CONSTRUCTION BMP SHEET (MANDA TORY) GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTlCES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD OWNER AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXEMPTlNG LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE ENGINEER. 2. EXCAVATlONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SHORED, BRACED, AND SHEETED SO THAT THE EARTH WILL NOT SLIDE OR SETTLE AND SO THAT ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM A LACK OF ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING AND SHEETlNG, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND HE SHALL AFFECT NECESSARY REPAIRS OF RECONSTRUCTlON AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. ALL EXCAVATION FOR A CONDUIT TRENCH, AND/OR STRUCllJRE WHICH IS 5 FEET OR MORE IN DEPTH, SHALL BE SHORED/BRACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAL-OSHA "CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS", CURRENT EDITION, CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE VALID SHORING PERMIT ISSUED BY CAL-OSHA. 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PAY ALL FEES AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORI< SHOWN IN THESE PLANS FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES, PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTlON DEVICES, INCLUDING BARRICADES, FENCING, WARNING SIGNS, LIGHTS, FLAGMEN OR OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR POLICE, FIRE, AMBULANCE, AND THOSE AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF UTlLlTIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE JOBSITE. 6. KCA ENGINEERS, INC. DOES NOT SPECIFY NOR RECOMMEND THE USE OR INSTALLATlON OF ANY MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT WHICH IS MADE FROM, OR WHICH CONTAINS ASBESTOS FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTlON OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS. ANY PARTY INSTALLING OR USING SUCH MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INJURIES, DAMAGES, OR L1ABILlTlES, OF ANY KIND, CAUSED BY THE USE OF SUCH MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS NOTE SHALL APPLY UNLESS THEY ARE EXPRESSLY WAIVED IN WRITING BY KCA ENGINEERS, INC. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP EXCAVATIONS FREE FROM WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION; STATIC WATER LEVEL SHALL BE DRAWN DOWN A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET BELOW BOTTOM OF EXCAVATlONS TO MAINTAIN UNDISTURBED STATE OF NA llJRAL SOILS AND ALLOW PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL TO SPECIFIED DENSITY. DISPOSAL OF WATER SHALL NOT DAMAGE PROPERTY OR CREATE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND SHALL BE PER THE NPDES REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND ALL OTHER PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN A CLEAN, SAFE AND USABLE CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTlON. ALL SPILLS OF SOIL, ROCK, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, ETC. SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIA TEL Y FROM PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY. ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN, SAFE AND USABLE CONDITION, 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL SOUND CONTROL AND NOISE LEVEL RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES WHICH APPLY TO ANY WORK PERFORMED FOR THE CONTRACT. EACH INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE USED ON THE JOB OR RELATED TO THE JOB, SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A MUFFLER OF A TYPE RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUF ACllJRER. NO INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE SHALL BE OPERATED ON THE PROJECT WITHOUT SAID MUFFLER. I ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~6S ~~~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS .. SURVEYORS .. PLANNERS 318 BRANNAN ST.' SAN FF.ANCISCO, CA.94107 . (415) 546-7111' FAX: (415) 546-9472 I I ~ 10. SHOULD IT APPEAR THAT THE WORK TO BE DONE OR ANY MATTER RELATIVE THERETO IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED OR EXPLAINED ON THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT KCA ENGINEERS, INC. AT (415)546-7111 FOR SUCH FURTHER EXPLANATIONS AS MAY BE NECESSARY. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTlFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY, UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY FIELD CONFLICTS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTlFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY EXISTING FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND PRIVATE LAND MONUMENTS ENCOUNTERED. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS). IN CASE OF A CONFLICT, THE MOST STRINGENT APPLIES. 14. ALL EQUIPMENT USED ON THIS SITE MUST MEET THE LATEST CAL -OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS. CHANGES SHALL BE INDICATED IN RED INK ON A CLEAN SET OF BLUELlNES OR XEROX DRAWINGS. DELIVER AS-BUlL TS TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AT THE COMPLETlON OF WORK. 16. IF, DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK OF THIS SECTION, CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THAT CONTRACTOR BELIEVES ARE HAZARDOUS (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25117 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE), CONTRACTOR MUST INFORM THE OWNER'S REPRESENT A TlVE VERBALLY WITHIN 24 HOURS, AND IN WRITING WITHIN 2 BUSINESS DAYS. UPON DISCOVERY, MATERIAL IS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED UNTIL INVESTIGATION BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATlVE. 17, CAUTION: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THEPREPARER OF THESE PLANS. 18. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 8 A,M. TO 6 P,M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY (EXCLUDING HOLlDA YS), 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THAT THE REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION NOISE (INCLUDING DELIVERIES, EQUIPMENT WARMUP AND MAINTENANCE, ETC.) PRESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 8,32 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ARE NOT VIOLATED BY THEIR OWN PERSONNEL OR ANY SUBCONTRACTORS WORKING ON THE PROJECT. 20. THE CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTED USE ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE SO CONDUCTED AS TO REDUCE TO A MINIMUM ANY NOISE VIBRATION OR DUST RESUL TlNG FROM THE OPERATION. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENCLOSE THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT WITH A CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION GATES TO BE LOCKED AFTER NORMAL CONSTRUCTlON HOURS. A SECURITY PERSON SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PATROL THE PROJECT AFTER NORMAL WORKING HOURS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTlON, AND ADEQUATE SECURITY L1GHTlNG SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ILLUMINATE VULNERABLE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS. 22. PLANS THAT INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASH OUT AND LOCATION OF THE ENTRANCE/OUTLET OF TIRE WASH CONSTRUCTlON MUST BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, CITY SITE LOCA TION VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE UTILITIES GRADING 1. EXISTlNG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE SURVEYOR AT THE TlME OF PREPARATION OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. LOCATIONS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VERIFIED IN THE FIELD AND NO GUARANTEE IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATlON SHOWN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTlFY UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 2 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO FIELD LOCATE UTILITIES, CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S,A.), AT (800)642-2444. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF THOSE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR INDICATED IN THE FIELD BY LOCATING SERVICES. ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTlLlTlES PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR VICINITY SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ASSUMED INCLUDED AND MERGED IN THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE. 1. TrlE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EFFECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT THE FORMATlON OF ANY AIRBORNE DUST NUISANCE AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM HIS FAILURE TO DO SO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A DUST ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 2. ALL GRADING AND EXCAVATlON WORK SHALL BE OBSERVED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, AND SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE SOILS REPORT. NOTlFY SOILS ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING ANY GRADING. UNOBSERVED AND UNAPPROVED GRADING WORK SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED UNDER OBSERVATION, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER, 3. ALL SITE GRADING AND EARTHWORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATlONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO GRADING ORDINANCE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETlON OF ALL THE EARTHWORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. NO DEVIATION FROM THESE PLANS SHALL BE MADE EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. BOTH CUT AND FILL AREAS SHALL BE SURFACE COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTlON OF THE CITY ENGINEER AT THE CONCLUSION OF ALL GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DOING ANY SITE GRADING AND EARTHWORK INCLUDING CLEARING. 2. ALL EXISTlNG UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT BECOME DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETELY RESTORED TO THE SATlSFACTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY ENGINEER, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. 3. ANY RELOCATION OF PUBLIC UTlLlTIES SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY AND ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY COMPANY INCLUDING FEES, BONDS, PERMITS AND WORKING CONDITIONS, ETC, THIS WORK SHALL BE DONE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY THE COST OF ALL SUCH RELOCATION WORK INCLUDING FEES, BONDS, PERMITS, ETC. 4, ALL PIP': ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AS INVERT (FLOW LINE) ELEVATIONS. 5, RIMS OF EXISTING UTILITY BOXES AND OTHER RELATED APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADES, 5. ALL ABANDONED BUILDINGS AND FOUNDATIONS, TREES (EXCEPT THOSE SPECIFIED TO REMAIN FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES), FENCES, VEGETATlON AND ANY SURFACE DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFF THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6, ALL MANHOLES, VALVES AND MONUMENT FRAMES SHALL BE SET TO FINISH GRADE AFTER PAVING, 7, ALL SITE STORM DRAIN LINES SHALL BE PVC, SDR 35. ALL STORM DRAIN LATERALS SHALL BE 4 INCH. 6, ALL SURFACE ORGANICS SHALL BE STRIPPED AND REMOVED FROM BUILDING PADS, AREAS TO RECEIVE COMPACTED FILL AND PAVEMENT AREAS. STOCKPILE SURFACE TOPSOIL FOR LANDSCAPE USE. 7. WATER ALL ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS AT LEAST TWICE A DAY, OR AS NEEDED TO PREVENT VISIBLE DUST PLUMES FROM BLOWING OFF- SITE. 8. NEW STORM DRAIN LINES IN CHESTNUT AVENUE SHALL BE CLASS 3. 12 INCH RCP. 9. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE EXTRA STRENGTH VCP AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2%. ALL SANITARY SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE 4 INCH. 8, SEE THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL TOP OF WALL ELEVATlONS. 10. THE ONSITE NEW CATCH BASINS ARE TO BE STENCILED WITH THE APPROVED SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE STORM WATER LOGO. 11. SEE FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS FOR ALL WATER LINE DETAILS AND SPECIFICA TlONS. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S SIGNA TURE: BY: DATE: 12. ALL SURFACE UTILITY FEAllJRES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, CLEANOUTS, AND VALVE COVERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONFORM TO THE PLANE OF THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT. SCALE: APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'BMl DRW. 01.10.08 1ENTATIVE MAP SUBMITTAL 111 BML CHESTNUT AVENUE CKD. REVD. Kl PJB 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS DATE 04/19/07 7.20,07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS VICINITY MAP, INDEX OF DRAWINGS JOB NO. 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL AND NOTES 5461 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA APPROVED: HORIZ. VERT. CO,O OF APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'BMl DRW. BMl CKD. ROO. Kl PJB DATE 04/19/07 JDB NO. 5461 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APPROVED: THE INFORMATION NOTED BELOW IS FROM THE TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED BY GL+A CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS. - - - - EXTERIOR BOUNDARY (R) RADIAL BEARING BUILDING LIMITS BENCH MARK REFERENCE @ CITY STD. CONC. MONUMENT FLOWLINE ELEV. PER BASE MAP 227 ELEV. FL. MH = 31.05 WAS USED AS BASIS OF ELEVATION FOR THIS SURVEY. FOUND 2 STANDARD CITY OF DALY CITY MONUMENTS AT THE CHESTNUT AVENUE WHICH BEARS N 15'30'00" E WAS USED AS BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY LEGEND & ABBREVIATION x @ @ @ so SS TL @ -4- ;'R{; !Xl D -0- PUE PSDE AE FH 01 WV WM PP TREES TO BE REMOVED STORM /SANITARY / TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTROLlER FIRE HYDRANT DRAIN INLET WATER VALVE WA TER METER POWER POLE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT FIRE HYDRANT DRAIN INLET WATER VALVE WA TER METER POWER POLE GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 tt. SI 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE PLAN, ABBREVIATIONS AND LEGEND SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 10' VERT. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA CO.1 OF I-~-~. - - MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING ----- ----- Iil MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C2.1 >- <( 3:: w > iY 0 0 r5 50 1.5% 45 40 2+50 1.5% 1,5% 2+25 2+00 1+75 DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE 318 BRANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCISCO, CA.94107 . (415) 546-711 1 . FAX: (415) 546-9472 APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES.BMl DRW'BMl 01.10.08 TENTATIVE MAP SUBMITTAL CKD. REVD. 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS Kl PJB APPROVED: DATE 04/19/07 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS JOB NO. 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL 5461 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION SOU TH SAN FRANCISCO I I --~ N J~ C) IZ 13= ~~I~ Itj (f) w ,z -' I~ <( 2 N u C) z 3= <( a:::: c w w (f) w Z -' :c u I- <( 2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD NOT USED. CD TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENTS PROPOSES GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ;:-OR DETAILS AND SECTION. 8) CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAil. (]) CD PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. @ o REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. @ @ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS, USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. @ @ @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. MATCH. EXISTING GRADES. CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFlC(H20)/BICYCLE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE, SEE SHEET C4,2 FOR DETAILS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE, SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFIL TER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORMWA TER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. @ CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. @ CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS, @ @ CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA, GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 5 it. 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SCALE: HORIZ, 1" = 5 VERT. CALIFORNIA C 1.1 OF r-----1f~--1l I III I [ j lj II : 7 'I MATCH --------- ~I "-:1 UI 01 ~ :z ~~ 51 ~, Cl MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C2.2 .,-:1 U ,10' VC , 10' VC SIDEWALK Wf.D S~ .... -I~~ 5 5 -= ~--------~ <( ,;:::> ..~ 0::::: VJCL en Cl w w if) , W' :z ---l 2% 1+25 10' VC u > W ~:> VJCL ~ en I, ~I ~I DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE 10' VC APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES.BML DRW.BML CKD. REVD. KL PJB DATE 04/19/07 JOB NO. 5461 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APPROVED: 318 BRANNAN ST.. SAN FRANCISCO, CA.94107 . (415) 546-7111 . FAX: (415) 546-9472 w => :z w > <( I- ::) :z I- if) w I U 50 45 40 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD NOT USED. (3) TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT PROPOSED GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. CD 8) PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND SECllON. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. (0 EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. o o o SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, REMOVE EXISllNG CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. @ @ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISllNG PAVEMENT SECTION. @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS. USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. @ @ @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. MATCH EXISTING GRADES, CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFIC(H20)jBICYCLE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFILTER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORM WATER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. @ CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. @ CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS, @ CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL, @ R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. GRAPHIC SCALE ( ill FEET ) llnch=5 it. 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 5 VERT. CALIFORNIA C 1. 2 OF W ...J <( 3: (f) .~ I _L_ 1 I __J MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C1.1 MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C1.1 l ~G'1> I 7.> :1;-;, 'J: '01 I ~ ~ ~i~ ~I~ ~j~ ~i5 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PROJECT NO. TENTATIVE MAP SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS CITY SUBMITTAL DESCRIPTION cl~ )~ 1 C) z 5: <( 0::::: o W W if) II IU l- <( L N N U C) 12 ul5: I~ IW IW I~ 1---1 1 I U l- <( ~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD CD NOT USED. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. TOP OF WAll ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT PROPOSED GRADES AT THE WAll. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. 0) 8) PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE lANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAilS AND SECllON. CITY. OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERllCAl CURB, SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. (0 o PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISllNG POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. o @ o @ @ SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISllNG PAVEMENT SECTION, CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB. GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, @ @ MA TCH EXISTING GRADES. CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFIC(H20)/BICYClE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE, SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS, @ CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFllTER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. @ CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. @) CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. @ @ CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GAlVANIZEC STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA, 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. GRAPHIC SCALE ( ill FEET ) 1 inch = 5 II 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE GRADING PLAN SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. CALIFORNIA C 2.1 OF N UI W W (J') W :z: -I /'.~c, ',.",.,) / ------- MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C1.2 MATCH I ~~~ ~il~ ~os i~~ N U (9 :z: $:1 ~I WI WI Ul, ~I -II I ::c u I- <( 2 ~<::) ~' IX w ...J <( 1i'Ji >- Ul Ul <( 0:: (;) 2 I" I NOTES: CD @ NOT USED. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT PROPOSED GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. ()) 8) PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND SECTION, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. (0 o PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. (j) SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. o REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, (0 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. @ @ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, FOR DETAilS. USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, @ @ MA TCH EXISTING GRADES. CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 21< WITH TRAFFIC(H20)jBICYCLE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. @) CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFllTER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORM WATER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. @ @ @ @ CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER ClEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. GRAPHIC SCALE ( rn FEET ) linch=5 tL APPROVED: TENTATIVE MAP SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05,31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE 111 CHESTNUT A VENUE SCALE: " HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. SITE GRADING PLAN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO C 2,2 OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. APPROVED: 316 BRANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCIS CD, CA94107 . (415) 54<i 7111 . FAX: (415) 546 9472 JOB NO. 5461 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 10 ft- AD 16 ....i_ GRA1E"47.20 l/iV. e"(OOT}-4J.70 ,.. AD IIIJ I ,:I-Q GRATE...47.30 p II I lHV.S"(OlTT)-<<.. i iO LOT 7 iO li= LOT 8 8 PLAY J I[ AREA = ="= 0 iii ~~;,J"(~S1b~G4)~ ,,- " \\'-. .i \\ " \ ,', ./ s. RI .L , : : . . : : , I" , S j~ :. :. "-' fd- wAn ms l--- .- . Pr- .....-- . 16 :AlE""47.05 !NV. 6~(OUT)-4J.60 . . IJ~ l~ /'FF D ~ @~ \'- "'~ @ ~- ~ .. :I~ LOT 5 i ~ /'r M@ UP r-il L~cr~ ] 11 ~ =Uu ::1" ~ ;\ .Q J1 m 1I1II F= 1= ,:r::lJ ENTRY ,lttnt h~ ~ Jm= ~ L) :ATE,,*46.40 16 ~v. "(M)o-I24O ~oo~ I" I " I ""47.40 16 I iii (0UT)..'3.50 m LOT 6 r' L d 0 I LOT 5 iii ~ ,..-.-' Ii! FH LOT 8 .m LOT 7 : : , : , I~ ~ ~Jr ~ ,~ ,. Ii ,. II II .~ 4-1 If2.W 2-1 1j2'W '-I 'f2'W ~ ;;; ,. iii Ii! I ," FIRE I I .5.5 LF 10" 51) 0 ...0.0224: : ~.O{ '2 LF 6" SS 0 5-0.02 I 20 ~~;lnllO; 5' LT. / lNV.-"!'.26 : I ;:;; '" ~~8 ,+"-" B '-' ::::~~:;;.?'';'''-4' " 'Or "m!;;) I:::!J @ ~,-~'" jZ} , ~~.-~~(~ ~T)-".20 ---, , I I sacs STA. 1+03.50 GRAlE...42.79 :~~: ~g:~Wl,~~~~46 95.S LF 10. SO 0 S-0.0224 liIij II ~M~MATCH EXIST. 19 INV. i 6"(1N)=32.00 !HY.; EXIST.(0UT)-31.S6:t: 85 LF 6' SS 0 5-0.02 lti ~~ 1+99.00 ~ r ~.11 :~~: ~~~(%n~~g 70 :l5 LF S" 55 0 5-0.12 v' 20 ~~~= 5' LT. /' Ii! 11. F= ~ .-- --.....- I - il WA] I tL ....., ,. '.. '. I I ~ 1 J I Ii:ilRs LOT 4 LOT 1 LOT 2 - " . -... ~ . . . : , . : T 3 16 ==;= '''' (GRA -47.30 , co, 'NY. .(00T)-44.06 ch El( I, ".J _ r C- UP ~ F=' ~ kd ,=- f-1 II' --=.lll ~-{I TE-45.70 I ,6"(OUl')>w42.B7 /1- I~ ~ I U=tmw~ NTRY o 'iii AD = -' = / '~~~,f '~" 1m : f '"mmL t:1 - ~ ~ ~!; ~J l:!0 LJ I~~ ~lliJI' PLAY I AREA oJ, ~ ~ = := . : '. I m 1= ::::n= i~~ :~ / ATE-45.S0 -@ r===O V. 0'"(001)-42.66 LOT 1 LOT 4 LOT 2 I : ~:;",,':~;~ ~tTL I / . ;r~~~~:1~ I, {!V : / ;H~: ;:t(~~6t .",..1<-0" If Y ULF" '0""'001 l--- ~ "'== AD 16 / ~y~~:c6?i:4 . . ~i ~: Jrf7 n ~ ~~T!'::~!:"'O.. . '\ J LF O' so IV. 0 \W,,......,.t7 ~;; 5=0.01 33 LF 6. SO 0 5=0.01 I! ?? ! '\ I \ ~ LF 6 so 0 5ooO,O.3,} I I "\ \ -. AD ..(,;;) GRATE-47.10 ~ INV. a"(OUT)"'44.10 @:An:"'47.30 / lHV. 6"(1HRU}=43.54 \ :ATE-47,30 -@> [NV. 6"(1HRU)-43.88 ~V~~=(~~)"4J.09-<:iJ ::;'v^ T~:;;;:':;~,-.,. \1.V APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'SMl DRW'SMl CKD. Kl REVD.PJS ~ DATE 11/27 /07 ~ JOB ND. 0:: 5461 SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 1 0' VERT. 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE MASTER UTILITY PLAN APPROVED: C 3 ,0 OF 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA _}1~TCH LINE. SEJ_DRAWING C3.}_ o t') lD t') o o II (/) @ o (/) (0 LL ...J C'-l lD ~ J II II I 5 3= 2-1 1/2"W (/) (/) o (/) FH 6" FIRE o (/) (/) (/) 3= 4 o (/) (0 6 o (/) (0 (/) (/) 55 LF 8" SO @ S=O.Ol 85 LF 6" SS @ S=0.02 SOCB STA. 1+99.00 15 GRATE=46.11 INV. S"CIN)=40.S0 INV. 1 0"CQUT)=40. 70 AO GRA =47.30 !!:;!VJ "COUT)=~4..:..0~ _ _ _ _ _ MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.3 I- -1 rn o Cl (f) 50 45 35 2+50 APPROVED: rn o Cl (f) 85 LF 6" 55 @ 5=0.02 3= 0 (/) ".q- 'in 'in 3= R 00 co"" 011 ~l1g ""~o II ~;,--' W;;-'''o I-co~ (2)> C>~~ @ o (/) (0 LL ...J ::;: SSCO 20 STA. 1+62.00; 5' LT. INV,=37.50 I 1 --~ 2+00 1+75 STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER PROFILES ~ 'in c5 0 ~ 0 LI) + ,...: n 0 II O<t > (f)1- (f) (f) ~ 1 1 N I'lJ U 1(.9 IZ 3: <( 0:::: o I~ w i~ U II- 1<( :::2: GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 5 fl CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD CD NOT USED. TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENTS PROPOSES GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. o 8) o (0 (2) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND SECTION. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISllNG CONCRETE CURB AND GUTIER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECllON. CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS. USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. MATCH EXISTING GRADES CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFICCH20)jBICYCLE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAILS. @ @ @ @ @ @ CONSTRUCT NEW STORM FILTER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORMWATER SOLUllONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAILS. CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4,l FOR DETAIL. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'BML ORW. BML CKO. ROO. KL PJB DATE 04/19/07 JOB NO. 5461 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION J1B BRANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCISCO, CA.94107 . (415) 546-711 I . FAX: (415) 546-9472 I~ 1'0 IU (.9 :z 3: <( 0:::: I~ ,Vl 'u..i Z -l ,I ,U I- <( :::2: 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE UTILITY PLAN SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA C 3.1 OF -----0--- o (!) <0 I I al C) :z I 3: <C 0:::: 01 Wi W if) l" 0 (!) :s: <0 0 0 (!) (!) WI :z ~I~ o (!) :s: o 2 I I L____ ~I UI C) :z 3: <( 0:::: o to to'<t; It) co ~cn~17 .... r---: 11 P 8 ~~5z ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~g w ~o -l 0 ~g ~i ~~ 0... V) OJ . u-a: 01- V) V) FINISH GRADE ALONG DRIVEWA Y CENTERLINE W W if) wi :z ---1 62 IF 6" SS @ S 0.Q2 :r: U I- <( 2 318 BRANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCISCO, CA94107 . (415) 546-7111 ' FAX: (415) 546-9472 35 LF 6" 55 @ 5=0,12 o (!) MATCH LINE. SEE -------------r---- AD f16\ I GRA TE=46.40 ~ I INV. 6"(OUT)=42.40 : I I I I I I I 8 ~46 I I 6-1 1 2"W (!) -....- (!) 6" FIRE in 95.5 LF 10" SD @ in (!) (!) SDCB 5TA. 1+03.50 GRATE=42.79 INV, 10"(IN)=38,56 INV. 10"(OUT)=38.46 ;::. J; F 1 I I I I L MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.4 ---~----- I- -l in 6 0 g (!) N + <Ci t') 0 II U<C :> V) l- V) V) ~ f1l ~ :I: -H N ::::0 r-- V) N l- V) ..;- 3= II V) ::::0 ~ w z C2 r FINISH GRADE :oj m r--. CJ)~ (!) '" OJ..;- CJ~ ~ ~ 1 ri 1I)l1- o ~~58 i 7 ~~ :~ ::::0>>> C2~~~ OJ ~~ CHESTNUT AVENUE 34.4 IF 12" SO @ S 0.02 APPROVED: STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER PROFILES GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 5 fL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD (] NOT USED. TOP OF WAll ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENTS PROPOSES GRADES AT THE WAll. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. Q) 8) @ @ o @ o @ @ @ @ @ @) @ @ @ @ @ @ PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE lANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAilS AND SECTION. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. SA WCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE P A VEMENI MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALI<. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. MATCH EXISTING GRADES CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFIC(H20)jBICYClE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA DRAIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS, CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFll TER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON TECH STORMWA TER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4,1 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER ClEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. PROJECT NO. OES'BML ORW'BML CKD. REVD. KL PJB OATE 04/19/07 JOB NO. 5461 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APPROVED: :c ::::0 o V) >--= V) ~ 50 35 30 CALIFORNIA 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE UTILITY PLAN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ''1 ([) n 0 c:i II 5 V1 @ 0 V1 <0 :J N co n @ D GRATE=47.10 INV. 6"(OUT)=43.80 5 c:i 11 V1 6 MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.1 MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.1 i ~ ~3~ AD GRA =47.30 INV. "(OUT)=44.06 3 16 UP @ 0 V1 to i.J... -.1 4 en 3 N 7 33 LF 6" SD @ S=0.01 GRATE=47.30 INV. 6"(THRU)=43.88 APPROVED: APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'SML DRW'SML CKD. REVD. KL PJ8 DATE 04/19/07 JOB NO. 5461 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 5 c:i 11 V1 @ o V1 to i.J... .-J o N 7.20 T)=43.80 ;g -, AD GRATE=47.30 INV. 6"(OUT)=44. ""'"' l'0 U I~ <( 0::: o w w (/) w :z: -I ':1: U I- <( 2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD (3) NOT USED. TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENTS PROPOSES GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. o o @ o (j) o @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND SECTION. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4,l FOR DETAIL. PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRE1E OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION, NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 DETAILS, USE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. MATCH EXISTING GRADES CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 21< WITH TRAFFIC(H20)/BICYClE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EK WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRA1E. SEE C4.2 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFll TER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CON1ECH STORMWA TER SOLUTIONS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER ClEANOUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAIL. @ @ @ @ @ @ R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRE1E BASE. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 5 It. 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE UTILITY PLAN SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA C 3,3 OF NOTE: WATER SERVICE LINES UP TO AND INCLUDING METERS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY. AD GRATE=47,20 JNV.. .Q,,(OU~)=.43. 70. 16 21/2"W 1'1) 1'1) u ~I ('oJ OJ t') 0 <:( ei 0::: II 0 (j) @ W Cl W (j) (/) i.o u.. ....J W z: -.J :::c: U I- <:( 2 21/2"W / w / 0::: G: I I ) / I / I AD (1(3\ GRA TE=46.40 \.:.:!) INV. 6"(OUT)=42.40 MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.2 MATCH LINE. SEE DRAWING C3.2 I I ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~~ ~ig ~~~ ~~!i 16 TE=45.70 . 6"(OUT)=42.87 1'1) 1'1) U C) z: 3: ~I w w ~I 2 -.J Cl (j)~ 0 :::c: '<oei II U u..(j) I- ....J <( ('oJ@ 2 INV. 6"(THRU)=43.09 APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'BML DRW'BML CKD. REv'D. KL PJB DATE 05/10/07 JOB NO. 5461 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE SITE UTILITY PLAN APPROVED: 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITIAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONNECT WA TERMAIN EXISTING OF 4)- 6" FIRE 1/2"W 2 1/2"W 1/2"W GRAPHIC SCALE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD @ NOT USED. TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENTS PROPOSES GRADES AT THE WALL. SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DRAWINGS FOR ACTUAL TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS. o G) @ o (2) o eEl @ @ @ PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAilS AND SECTION, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TYPICAL 6-INCH VERTICAL CURB. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAil. PAINTED STOP SYMBOL AND STOP BAR. EXISTING POWER POLE AND ELECTRIC BOX TO BE RELOCATED. SEE JOINT TRENCH PLANS. SA WCUT EXISTING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND REPLACE 2-FOOT STRIP OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SEC110N, CONSTRUCT NEW FOR DETAILS. USE DPIVEWAY, CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET C4.1 DRIVEWA Y STANDARDS. @ CONSTRUCT NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. @ MA TCH EXISl1NG GRADES CONSTRUCT NEW 2'x2' CATCH BASIN, CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL 2K WITH TRAFFIC(H20)/BICYClE-PROOF FRAME AND GRATE. SEE SHEET C4.2 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT NEW 12"x12" AREA CENTRAL PRECAST PRODUCTS, MODEL EI< WITH PEDESTRIAN FRAME AND GRATE. SEE C4,2 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT NEW STORMFll TER UNIT, MODEL SFDWN MH48, CONTECH STORMWA TER SOlU110NS, WITH 3 CARTRIDGES. CONNECT TO EXISl1NG STORM DRAIN MANHOLE. @ @ @ @ CONSTRUCT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAilS. CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR DETAil. R1 "STOP" SIGN ON 2" DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE SIGN POST SET IN 12" DIA. 36" DEEP CONCRETE BASE. SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. CALIFORNIA C 3 A OF [r-- --. . ~ ~._- B "'''''',''''.'''-~ IL ~1~)!fi;: ..~..-,,,,,, -- r: o I/! ! i "~~"',"'> \\ '::~\ i . ",,,.:.=' i -/ , .,...,' ice,,, --.- --- ....'1 ,,'.,., . :. I ..'.. ~.;- .<, __ _._ ,__ ,. eo" "u" '"'' ",,,.,,, \1 ,,',. .,,".;., ;C"';:::';,' ,~,i~,;'" 1-"<':' I I ~, . . : ; ..'. . .~ , ~ ",. .v .,', 1".-''''1 '!"C;:;'- T , . : . . ~ ,.. ~j I I ,ii ';h '~7~~\ r" \,,_~?!F "".C" {,' "" ,""'" M'''",,, ,V I I' ~"~;JrJti"'~::'+'~?,): ,"::::;''''',;',::;':'", '''' 'h. "T/ "''' i:L_l:- I -i~__.c12Z:'E+::::;-'';:::_LZ\tf,-'''~ -'.. ,-i,,--c I I ., '.' .I~. .,.., :::i'G~'7,+:';-f'X TjF Tij " I". '0,"., n,",", I. c.1 . ,.. " .., " "'''''~'''" ."" ,,,,,,t1 ,.;- ,;;:,,~:, ."'1,,, - ! , eo, v HH ""'" co,,,,",, ii""'I.""" , ;:~;,i~I:r;m"f:."'g\"~D!:';!i:; 'Ie C,W CUT 10 P"DVlD' " IEM VCRli\;:t i:gi;;:,.;;,Ctt0i,'H.;:.;;";!r'{~;CRC1[ 2 i1"L'." HWce" ""'C :XI'III1.:O Cl,'''Of,'', ,",'Vt, v"',\~~ 'i;;:r "UiTCI' '^"'" "' ,,,,PIXf[lY REHO'IeD , ~2~~~i;~j ,';'.":' ~!"~,' ,."~ I/i?::;,c'~';P:J]~~I';2r\f: lILUG' cum: " I ._:;;~:,p~.T .! ,,". ',.w 'NO <'r :;:,; DRIVEWAY APO;.:;';c'~'~E" "..... "" "'.,' Ci'iO,e;; '" ,,;: !,:; ":'::."",-." _ ! "".c,,, n,," _ CITY OF:,),0i~~,;';,;"" 1Jc,'-".. U<'"cJ[ I,;;s:!;" ,"'''.,,,, . ",,,';^,;;:r I.~-~ '''-., Jj ..... .~g,!:!';\~'~~; ~) ,;C,,;;,i-",;;," ","",' " ,i,vtv^, ; ; r=~~ ., ",'r,',,: I ! .;C;;;'-''',,;,.' I .),~I.:"t, J').I.~ ',."""',, ,." ''''f! //~!] l ]; ;';;',;~;:;;;~: f ''''rtF,';::; [!;.;. _.-......_, --c ':"'-7//m >t2ITf"" LCJCjCiiTUD1NAL l~fI~" i. I;_+~;~'+;I ",,,,m,'''':: '''' ,.,,, i. ~ITY OF SOUTH . '..' .fr.. T~:!~!=::l STPljD!\RDLt,V+~~;~:[r~L~I:l\l; PIPE SEWER ,y ;,0'. 'iii;';;'!;r,,; 'M"':lEJa~_ CfI,."".1. i'~;;;.;;;";,, i ENGINEERS G ""'...~, ,.. G PLANNERS '\. 318 BRANNAN ST,' SAN FRANCISCO. CA,941 07 , (415) 546-7111' FAX: (415) APPROVED: . "'"0"'0 '. ,ril~~~d~-i' I! I /1 ... _.1 -,= -- ...J--~' .. I I I: : .... J--.I_ ..J., J__ --1..1- . SO"" '" f .""rnm,;,,, ~ fJ ,.,i,;'~;:,'D ' ~N;::;o~/;C';'.\, .;;fj;c C:~~> m", "'''''' 1m 'I~<':'~' ,'we' I-;!;-I :Y( i'/3K " ".,,,,y,\'\ >/11 11'/1 ..(( L~.l I)) 111[9 / / / ~'~L ~/ ... ./ ""~ '. < ......' j:-== /' I;: " r!c.:'.~) / "" ~< l~~ ., I '" ,'2>-/ ,- "/ -fJ // I . 'f,~'~'i;' PLAN I ,',,,.,,,r, m" 'u,""'" I " ",,__.;~'V'''ii''6 , ,,~/!,,!jA1gJu,\'j," l\'k\ 1<:1.1 j';',,{ wITH CURB~ND .'" ,.,,1, ."~:,..",, "'~, -,,,'co, Ml"'"", -" -1, '\i., ,I II n.., nrml ,., II ,--,... "I.'"'' '''\ 7/11 I-:!;,: (z-m ':" ..~ / "rl:-':;~'." ..... .,,;:.06'.) (, ,~ \\~~~i~;-v \ ., ::ciT" T ." l,i:;, . i/ ",ne> "";:';;";;:';;':'7 'I 7.\ jj;;:('i":;.'r'''';1ri....'r ""n, " mev"., '''",",'',D "-7 /! ,""""" .''"-4 '." .....,.. "',,1: ;_:~:," U ,., ,)U" U u U c SECTION ALOt% Y AXrS I fzz~dpS CURBSI~r~ri/~~~T~I, f,~~~~():li2 .,,"~~~i\A~C,i~RriI~;riXP";:;i.P:' ;f,2!1~T "~~:~WR~h~i~~~~~',~sp~~?,,, c, \~~~i~~~WRLCU\J!C It,pn (,I.l r;;,S[ H,mRIAL SHALl "COHR^CTEni~ R[~QUIR[Il 9Y Cfn [NGIIHR. ~"C CQHP,iC'rED Tn ge% i~A';:tr:r n'F,~~rg) PU,CED EARPEL AHD ClJNE-SECTJU"S 'HAL ';~OiH~ .I~~~'~,f SHALl USE A HIX m' TV':f~~~TS PA~V!"~NE PART WfE"T. "HT,I'Y SEVER "AHHOI ES, MHO AlIlI HORTAR "LL JOINTS PRIOR TO VATER PRCOFi/iS . PR[lOm:e DE nm'F "om"",,,, , SPECrFJCATlUNS, i~C0iH"ii~rir~E :~o,:;g~ P~'~RLlHFDR" ;;VEEP .., 'r~~'ISlTlON rOR LAI l.R,'t."<"6',fCTOR. IIANU,ACTO",U nnltlGS ,ue A DROP ;',CROSS """HOLE or 0.10 rEET FOSSlBll. 'OH[1l UNE "Nns [lR P;PE .- '''~''','U''''''',",''''G3 ,,,,.;;,, 1 """","OUPUI:O ,,,,N .OW""' :/ " i 'co om """"m" ... .... ... ........,,,,..,,,,,, ."".. fl! I '"*''' I '''>I OR ST,6J-JDARDS MANHOLE 1M", INN I STAeIDA.RDS For, SIDE.WAU< RE.PAIR "."." /"""^" ""''''10'' FRANCISCO ;':.' '~",: ow, "" ,o""'~J;J".....c... 0Iv<;:.rZ.;,.",;;~ ..... I'''''' 1"0""''',<0 "' . p,<< ~"".".,, ',,,,, m""1J~, ()J.vcJI 1.;S'~~r:'__- . ,'.. Pm< ~ '''',,"'''' "" ''''''.1 -",'.;", ./.!::.. ""\"'f.;$;7 '" "VC"'H .!:.: """'''''''' // I <(//>-:< ,~,!~;i i::~;:" =_<' trX >/ % I~, .f?~. . 1_';,;;__ '.0 OOO,~~,p ')000000.),0' (10' (lOO -ol~06c~~ ;..:>>, .//~. . 'WUUDULlOOOO " 001) 1)0 I) .:::-.~:o , , " , .',. ';1,;',:,:", g I . ~ ~~"," I"" '.".',. .. .".'c;~.>;,;;!.).., '""", SECTIOH nUiES, ~~~KEiL RE,~U~~'t. ~i.::'~,;;',;~;'i~u;;:;E LIP 1/4' or,,,,,,,, r ,'.rorrm ,."ml 0g~:.i'~;f ""';It,l TIC :nNCRrT'i"~~'Ngf,,~R~~;~~ TEO:,~;,fI'~'ii,~7, ~? rii,Eiict<',;'6;,.,rn;!:~;~ SIDES OF TRElm ~~:::ig:i~~~~i FABRle TO BE ~~If~~T;~~H~;~ OR ',PFROVED EOUAL fl25 GALLO" PER ~6~fRg[ 1',"'0: 3,UUtl fLlmLlAT',~l:'''iHi;,''tLiE li,i;: '~'UlOi;'ElE om ,- ,::: ....... . .., ... i TRENCH REPAIR , '"" ,^', I P A.VEfAENT REINFORCED F r,BR!C ."~ 'C>': ;::," ;,~;"", .1 NPPrN't1,.....:.. O.Lo<~Lr~~~=: I ,,;or; ii- 8" :'"""Cfl~ Cp~~,t:;~',F'H ~ " ,," ,. I!\ li;8.L';~ii'L=-"<<cr>"p~C;;"G;" ",1m. 1 """ ,r / v ! CITY OF~SOljTH S-ANFRhN~"~n : ~;';;T "m... '" '.. ...... '. ., .: ,~. ,. ""^"'" ,;' '~!r ,;:~, '''''''i''1 l,,-~';C. ,... ..~ .-..., ,/~-" 'F'''''' 'd" f'''. -;~~JU- "....,.,ce.. .1, :E~}) II ,=". ,-'~'.O.=r,,= ''''';,.,,,. \. 'I II .I'f'} '''.;;'' ~ " ii jl) III ..""" ".,...,,, III !.' Iii 1-.".JU,l~jh<-1I\ C~_.L<~\J>.j\- w ""ER "!?E JfHW$ '''',l.L liF Sf'ElD ;;,k Uf! [,,',','u.n:, ,ru,'I. TAP ",m f'T ;:Nr,S !,CPRCIV;;" [lU [J' fiR L.'Ke,l? rlr: III [',,",eu," ;.r ~&~;.' ''':r::r:~ \z.~ ! "n "" .. ....,. '-'.'" ~ -I:r~~:::~- ,:c.',,,. I 'r'l N... ".f."',' I FRANCISCO "'r "",,,.,,,, '''''' . """';"I5c,,-'-'.. ..["1:,;,,,:,,;,;,.'_. I ,,,i;",,,,,",,, "~ ,,,'co,, I , . ...... PAVEMENT ,:...'::<:..,"':.""li','C."",',,~ .'.Q"..' ... ::C<:,..rr AGGREGATE .....:.. 6" MIN, I, -- COMPACT TO 95% UNDER I )- 0~~~E~JN~~gA~fN~. ~~~~~JT T~N~0~5~NDER ----... - ~~~~~~DT~yB~E SOILS UNDER LANDSCAPING~ ENGINEER, 6" MIN,L~- FREE-DRAINING T ./ "\"::~'....".: SAND BEDDING I ......... \-. /i 4" MIN, ...... .:......... i/ '6" MIN. I Lo- SAND BEDDING AND '!RENCH BACKFILL MATERIALS TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, '!RENCH BEDDING AND BACKF1LL TO BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY GLOBE SOILS ENGINEERS AND DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2003. lJTlllTY TRFNr.H 11FT All NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO_ DES'BML I DRW, BML 111 CKD. KL TREVD'PJB fJJ CHESTNUT A VENUE z 12,05,07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 0 STANDARD DETAILS DATE 05/16/07 fJJ ,20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS ~ JOB NO. n:: 05,31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL SHEET 1 OF 2 5461 NO, DATE DESCRIPTION -I SOUTH SAN FRAf\JCISCO CALIFORNIA " SCALE: HORIZ. VERT. C 4.1 OF ) ..J ... 'm<< MARCH.19B7 ....04/21/00 Dl PRECAST CONCRETE DROP INLETS 1-1 CENTRAL PRECAST CONCRETE CO. 1386 COFPERHiLL PARKWAY SANTA ROSA. CA 95403 (707)546-5016 r----7 ' I / ~I , FRAME SIDE BAR GRATE FRAME ANGLE ~"" ~::::lp/ L1FllNG HOLE ~ /" .CDWC AND x~?J~ ~ -~ / ~ S- .""". i /1 ISOMETRIC ;0 -,-~ I DROP INLET TABLE TYPICAL SECTION MODEL IN MM IIN MM IN ~iM NOTES: EK 12 305 12 305 4 102 1. FRAME AND GRATES MAYBE SPECIFIED FOR BK 16 406 16 406 5 127 OR CK 18 457 18 457 4 102 IK 16 406 24 610 5 127 2K 24 610 24 610 5 127 OR 3K 24 610 30 762 5 127 51( 30 762 30 762 6 152 2. ~'oru 'Drc "Dn""c IL 24 610 36 914 6 152 AVAILABLE SEE DRA\I1NG 1M 36 914 36 914 6 152 1-3 AND 'DI-DO' PAGE 3L 24 610 4B 1219 6 152 1. FRAME AND GRATES DETAILS SEE PAGES 1-6, 3M 36 914 48 1219 6 152 1-7. 1-8. AND 1-9. 1R 4B 12194B 1219 6 152 DETAIL 1 TYPICAL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE I"'" ''''' MAY,1988 PN PAVING NOTCH DETAIL P~N(I.. 1-9 5/19/00 CENTRAL PRECAST CONCRETE CO. 1388 COPP!RHlll PARKWAY SANTA ROSA. CA 95403 (707)546-5016 ~~~ ~~~ 1~1EEL PER PLANS PRFfCA<:;T PAVIN~ N~ nFPTH TARI F ~ CiiF\!r;(,.; MODEL IN MM ('!! EK 1-1/2 38 ~ ~ A ;,i,,', BK 1-1/2 38 ~ .//.? ~C; CK 1-1/2 38 1K 1-1/2 3B , 1lJ" ';i, 2K. 3K 2 50 5K 2-1/2 63 1L 2 50 ~tJ~rsizirpi:R' PAVlNG NOTCH "0" 1M 3 50 3L 2 50 ~ 3M 3 76 lR 3-1/2 89 PRECAST PAVING NOTCH GALV. S1EEL "'AME~ W,['tllED IN 1HE PER PLANS FRAME _~ '-- \,MORTAR BED \ I ~~l K~ MOOTAR BED ~ \ TO PRECAST BASE ~'::f~ ~~~J~~ ~f,~H. ~,., r ISOMETRIC SECTION 1 FIELD FORMED PAVING NOTCH NOTCH DEPTH DETAIL DETAIL 4 TYPICAL DETAIL NOI IV "'-'AU. I KCA ENGINEERS, I ~ ~<:~::, r :~~ I;;FI\:lInl;.n\;/ & & PLANNERS ~~~ 318 8RANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCISCO. CA.94107 . (415) 546-7111 . FAX: (415) 546-9472 APPROVED: APPROVED: I"~ CUSTOM PRECAST CONCRETE DISCHARGE OPTIONS DD-50 P~uo.. 1-4 1388 COPP!RHlll PARKWAY SANTA ROSA. CA 954{J3 (707)546-5016 I '~:RCH,1987 I R~i'17/00 CENTRAL PRECAST CONCRETE CO. - ~ ""~~'17 SET OVER PIPE <D? ~ I rr:JQ;J I tl'~~ I ::&' ~~b'/ ,~~ ~/ ~ CD ~P~~P~~~~S CAST G) ~~~~Kg~~sAliEQtD. 0 ~~WsE~~~~O~IP~A~~E~I;.:'G AS REQURIED PRECAST WAll. SECTION I( ~ 8~StV" ,,~ -~"CU - 'i. .....- Y:2 ~rk CD ~'i\t03~C~~~ gtf~NGS @ PIPE OPENING CAST INTO BASE ~ 1. ANY DISCHARGE OPllON SHOWN HERE MAYBE COMBINED \11TH ANY OF THE DISCHARGE OPllONS. SHOWN ON DRA\I1NG D1-S0, PAGE 1-3. TO CREATE A COMPLETE CUSTOM INLET. 2. WHEN WALL SECllONS ARE USED. SPECIFIED TYPE OF BOTTOM JOINT REQUIRED FLAT OR TONGUE & GROOVE. DETAIL 2 TYPICAL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. DES'BML I DRW'BML CKD. KL I REVD'PJB ~ DATE 05/16/07 ~ JOB NO. e:: 5461 @ BASE \I1THOUT OPENINGS ~jj G ~~~f~~~JPg~INR~UEST ~2.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS ~.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE:_,-- DESCRIPTION MOOR l~ I~ l~' BE....RlH~tl ANGLE SIDE DAR I~ I~ I~l EK H \2-3/6 12-3/8 15 1-1/2.Xl-1/2 1-1/2...-1/4 14-3{4 12-1/6 12-1/15 BK : 16-3/8 HI-JIB 19 1-1/2:<1-1/2 1-1/2:11/4 16-3/4 16-l/e 15-5/6 lK : 1&-3/8 24-3/6 19 1-1/2X1-1/2 Cf( : 16-JIB 16-3/B 21 1-~::-11~':.2 2K : 24-3/8 24-J/8 1-1 2::<1 1/i :~6~~~~1: 1- r nu. CLOSED MESH I DETAIL FOR CENTRAL PRECAST CONCRETE CO. GRATE LOCKING DETAILS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE DROP INLET I """'MAY. I 985 I''''' H. LOCK IRW'5/18/00 1,,,,,H.1-5 CENTRAL PRECAST CONCRETE CO. 13B8 OOPPERHILL PARKWAY SANTA ROSA, CA 95<03 (707)54&-5016 ~~ LOCKING CLIP 'L~ BOLT -'VI ~ _ ,- LOCKING CUP FRAME ANGLE [m____ 1.-, WJr' ""'I~~c( IU 6. 'd , .,o.~~i:r=:/!'; OROP INLET TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL DROP INLET A T LOCKING DEVICE ~ 1" ::;ED TO ~I. ~ I ~~1E BEARINO;.P~..;1 FRAME BEARING ANGLE WllH 1/4.0 ~~R~MATCH f,>>, LOCKING LDCl<lHG c A IF '1 STEEL oRATE e> ""--(DfFRAME ______ 1 ANGLE o '-.... .un, co mD ~~~~G FRAME SIDE B~ J ~ 3/8" DIA. ANCHORS~ L lD FRAME PLA~I FRAMES ~ OF HOLE Q _==;:---'1r ~ OF BAR I _~ lli- LOCKING BOLT - 1- Y BEARING PLA 1E 3/16""" 'MDE 'MTH 3/8-" HOLE /' i,{~Ri"READED ------ ;' S H ~ AND GRATE I ""OCT..1994 1_110. INLET I Ro<. 5/19/DD I"" H, 1-8 1388 COFPERHlll PARKWAY SANTA ROSA, CA 95<03 (707)546-5016 "-- l' i'-' BANDING 8ARS AT EACH END BARS: GRATE PLAN GRA TE BEARING BARS BAND BAR I 1H BARS 1-1/4lO/16 lK3/16 21 1-1!4X3!Hi 1xJ/16 27 1-1/b1/4 16-3/4 24-1/8 U-15/IB 1-1/4xJ/16 h3/16 41 l-lj2xl/4 1-1/4x3/lG lx3/16 31 2:0:1/4 20-5/6 16-1/!:! 16 l-J/4lf3/l5 1-1/2xJj16 ~=:;~:~: 26-3/4 l4-l/a Uo-15!15 ~~Il//:-:tl: ~:~;,66 41 ;1 V PARTIAL PLAN OPTIONAL SECTION AT LOCKING DEVICE NOTES: 1. FRAME AND GRATES ARE HOT DIPPEO GALVANIZED AFTER FA8RICATlON PER A.S.T.M SPEC. A-123. 2, FOR OPllONAL GRATE LOCKING DEVICE SEE DWG. NO. LOCK, PAGE 1-4. DETAIL 3 TYPICAL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DETAIL 5 TYPICAL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE r 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE STANDARD DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 2 --' SOUTH SA.N FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA " ( SCALE: HORIZ. VERT. __ C 4,2 OF J ~ I TIRE WASH AREA LOT 4 CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE AND STRAW WATTLE ALONG WESTERL Y PROPERTY LINE 1. Extension of Fabric into the Trench Place Straw Wattle behind Silt Fence ( l 3. Backfill and Compact the Excavated Soil. 2. Attach Silt Fence to Posts and Extend it into the Trench. SILT FENCE DETAIL NTS STRAW WATTLE DETAIL NTS APPROVED: PROJECT NO. DES'BML DRW. BML CKD. KL REVD'PJB ~ DATE 05/30/07 ~ JOB NO. D:: 5461 EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES: placing appropriate silt fencing, silt sacks, and straw 2. All work shall conform to the City of South Son Francisco Standards and Specifications. S. All erosion control facilities must be Inspected and repaired at the end of each working day during the raIny season. or other visual symptoms of impurities are noticed in the storm water, contact the civil plan. Sediment on B. All employees, contractors, and subcontractors are responsible for conforming to the elements shown on this plan. 9. Contractor to employ Best Management PractIces (BMP's) In accordance with the Association of Boy Area Governments (ABAG) latest recommendations. 10. All dumpsters or other trash storage enclosures sholl be utilized solely for non-hazardous materials,. remain in be protected with appropriate erosion control measures to the 13. Remove spoils promptly and ovoid apparent, stockpiled soils and other I f rain Is forecas t or 14. Store, handle and system. Contractor basins, storm drainage, or 15, Use filtration or other approved measures to remove sediment from dewatering eflluent. 16. the site shall be permitted to allow deleterious materials from entering 17, The fallowing notes sholl be adhered to: 0) Water all aelive construction areas at least twice a day. or os needed to prevent visible dust plums from blowIng off-site. b) Use tarpaulins or other effective covers for and for haul trucks that travel on streets. c) Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply stabilization on all unpaved parking areas and staging areas daily. d) Sweep 011 paved access routes, parking areas, stoglng areas daily (preferably with water sweeper). e) Sweep street doily (preferably with water if visible amounts of soli material are carried onto public streets. f) Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soli stQbillzers to inaelive construction areas (previously graded areas InactIve far ten days or more). g) Enclose, cover, water twice doily or apply (non-toxic) soli binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc,). h) Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roods to 10 mph. i) Install sandbags or other erasion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. j) Replant vegetation in disturbed areas os quickly as k) Install wheel washers for 011 exiting trucks, or off the tires of all trucks and equipment leaving the site. J) Limit the area subject to excavation, grading and other construction activity at anyone time. 18. Prior to commencing construction, install silt sack or equivalent into catch basins on adjacent streets. Exist. PLAN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS GRAPHIC SCALE SILT SACK DETAIL NTS ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 il APPROVED: 12.05.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 7.20.07 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS 05.31.07 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 111 CHESTNUT AVENUE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 10' VERT. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 318 BRANNAN ST.' SAN FRANCISCO. CA.94107 '(413) 546-7111' FAX: (415) 546-9472 C 5.1 OF CALIFORNIA Stotmwate.r 00llStmcIirIg telllpOl'lUy check <lams or 'OOnns where l\P,Pro]ttim ~ Y01U"~ _llU~rs, Make lhese broo1mres av&lab1e to ~wlm wor.ki; Olllhe COllStructio.n site. Imbnn ~ about lhenew srormwarer~and1helr~tiel!. Gcod~ pm;ti<<a .fD~ one oomp1etoly ~ llmfl fOr 8I.1to parJrlng. vebill1e:re:fuelhls, _ mutioo <lquipmlmt ~e. 'The designated area lllwuld be vtellaway .fimn sh1)ems Qf stoIm dtain inIelll, mid 1:>ermed if neces- sary, Make major repaim off site. ..fKeep materi.als wt of the :rain - p:i\lvent 1'UIWff ~ lit the llG!lI:W. Cover eJqlosed. pi1~'S of son or OOlllltluctinn Dllllerlals with plastic sheeting or lempomy roofs, ~ poll1.1tanls off ~d ~e5. Place trash caul> :mdrecycling~ around the l>itewm.inimize lltl<lI: "Dry swoop paftd ~1hatdmin to $torlll drain&, creeks, <n'cltannellI.1fpavemetrtfiushingia X1C<:tllSIlIy, UI1e sill pond!> Qr ofuar teclmiques to tmp sediment and ofuerpoU~ .fClean up leab" qs and o1Der spills immediately so ihey do not ~!lOll Ql' groundwater or leaw ~ on pave4 $urfaoes. Use dl:y c1e;mup w:lbodll wheoova poll$ible. IfYOU:mustt1Se water, us.e just <e<<iOugh to keep the du8tdown. .f~ and:ma.mtain ODIllpsli6m. Cb.eck frequently fur leaks. Place dumpstenl under roofs or cover with taqJs or plaslic sl1eeti:og sooll11ld lmland the ootside ofille dum:p$teJ:. A plastic lioo: is recmmnended to prevent lealmgi,\ of liquids. Never dean out a Umi:lpstet by hosing it down on lhll romIttIIlllU:m site. .....Make Stir" porlaMe toil;ltlJ ~ mam~ in good wotk:iug 0J!dm: by the ~asing company and that 'IVlls4es are dillpQsed at propetly. Check toilllts frequ.el.tlJy fur leak$, MaU:ria.1s/wa.8t;e bimdlirJg .fI>r1Ictice llatIICe :relkl.cli0ll - %Il:inimm: waste when yw order ~ Qrd.er cm.'y fhe amount you nocd W f:misb the job. .fUlle recyolablll malerials wlll.lllever possible. AmIllge furpick-up ofxecydabk materials such lIS concrete, asp'halt, Ilcmp metal, roIV'IltIts, degreaoors, cleared wg- elation, paper, rock, and vehicle~ IXIllterl.als such llll used oil, lUll:i.l:h:c7..e,1:mttl:ries, :md 1.i.re6. ..IDi8pose of IIlI wastes lllld dlmwlitinn debi:is properly. Many COl1Slruclkm materials and wastes can be :recycled, including aolvenlll, wilier-bilged paints, ve:hicle fluids, broken asphalt and co:ncrete, wood, and cleared vegetn- lion.. MIlleri.alJl atId ~ that<;am1.Ot be ieCj'cled must be1ahn to all ~ landfill or dispoll\ld of as hawrdoos wll$le..NeverOOrywallte malerlalllor leave !hem in the street or nelll' a cre!l'k Of stream bed. ,{ Mainmin.aIlwhiclssandhelwyequiptw::nt.~fre.. q'Jently fur andrepllit Ieab. ..... Perl'orml!llljormaintenanoe, repsirjobs,;md~ and equipnrentwashing off stia ,{ If you must drain:md~ motor oll,Ilidialof coolant. or other t1Wds 00 site, lIIle drip pallll or drop clo1i!s to c~h drips and spills. Con<lCt all spent fl.ui.ds, stare in sepllIlitecontainllm, and rec:yclew~possible, or dispo!Ie atfMrls as!l.azaXdoUil WllIl1e. ,{ Do noll\OO ~e1 oU 10 lubricate or clean equipment or psrts. ,( ~ llSed vehicle batreries. "f Clean up spills 00 dirt_ by d1ggingup and properly disposing of COlltal:ninllte soiL " Report significant llPills w the appropriale IlPiIJ. re:spanlle agencies immediately. You me required by law to n:p0It aIl8~esof'hllzardous~inoludlng oil. 1b report a spill, call !he following ag<:ncies: 1) Dial 911 orYOlIdooal ell:ltIgw.c:yrespon!lCmunber, 2) CIIlI the Governor's ~ ofEmergencyServkm Wlmling Center, (800) 852-7550 (24 h<.'Iw1s). ~ CmnltmotlDD. ,{ Awid paving and ooa1 ooating in wet weather, or when mill iS~t before1resh pavement will have time to cure. .t Cover and ooa1 caWh blIsiDs and manholes when applying s.ealooat, shmy seal, mglleal, ~ ~ ~ "fUse c.beckdmls, ditches, orberms to dh'llrtnmoffarolUui ,{DOn'tmix\lPmoreftesh~teor<;emf,,:nUhauyouwill =valions. ~inaday. .f Never wash. excell$ ma1er:ia.l fuin1 eJqlOud- asgregate coo- cme Ol'llimUat treatnlen1sjnW II slreetorstorm drain. Col- ,{ Setup andopenlle small ~oo taxpi; ot b.eavy p1llstic lect:md~, or ~ to dirt area.. drop clotha. .f Cov<<!Itockpile3 and tlIher COIIlllrUI::lio n::aterria1s with plastic tlupll. Protect from xainfulllllld tn=t11lJl.Offwilh "When cleaning l.1p afi:l'lr driveway or sidewalk coll!llrnc1ion, ~ 1'OOfa or p'!astic sheets and beImB. - . 'IVllllh i:i:nes 0II1l:r dirt IlfellII, nm down fue driveway or into ,{ Catch dripa from paw;rwith drip pIlW or ~ mlIteriaI the stroet or 5tomJ. <lmiB. (cloth., tags. e1c,) p.laced 'Ullder machin~ wMn not in tille, ., Clllan up 1IlI$pills tmd leaks llsiug"dry" me1hodll (wilh J' Prevent aggregate 'IVllllhfu:1m ilrit-'I.lWayfpstio cot:lSttw:tioo abooroen.tmaterla.l8Jrags), or dig up and:remove contl!lni- from <mteringlllorm drains. Hose aggregate Wllllh onto dirt llll!ed!loil . _ and llpllde into dirt .f Collect and recyck or lippfOJlriately di.spo5'e at excess a'brasive gravel ('II' SIllld. ,{ Avoid over-applk:ation by wal:e1' lI1I.Cb: for dust oontrol. mIly. .fSeed orplant tenlpOmyv~futerosion OOlltroloo lI.lopes or where cOnsb:uctIDniB not ~p:laimed. .{Protect down&I.ope dr.ainllge eoumes, llI:reiIIl18, and storm drainll with hay bales, tempo!llly draillagl:lllwaleB, sill . lknceJI, berms or storm <hain inh:t fil.Iem. .fUse checl< dams or dftebelI in divert mnoft arou:od elOOava- lions and gmded areas. .t Cowt fltoollplle8lmd excavated soil with ~ imps or plastic sheeting, piwlpfIy, . .t Ped:mI major~.repair8, and Wlllllting ofeg,uip- mentawa.y ftonl the <XIl1Iltnlction site. .f When refuelitl,gorwbiclelequipmentnWlltel1lUlCe lOO8tbe done 011 site, designate a oompleOOly con!lIined aml.lf.W'il:y :from l!torm Grains :md creeb. .tDonotuse~onto~orelean~Ql' ]'Wt8. ,{ ~e used (li!, batteries. ~, brokl:n a;phaIt,. elc. wheneverpossib1e. . " 'D:ain employees in using these best management prlWtices, ,{ ~ bags of =nent~ IheY.me open. Be surll to keep wind-blown cement powder t!'IVllY from guttl:lr!!, srorm dmins, minillJl, lUIdxunoff. "WaSh out ~~ only in designated wash-mttareas inyourya:rd, wbe:rethewaterwm:lklww.o contninment ponds or onto dirt. Let concrete bJlrde:n and dispooe of as g:a.tbage. ~p0s6ibl~ recycl\: waahwt by pumping back inlD mWa fi:lr I'\!lIIlle. Never dispose afwuhlnrt into the ~ IItmm l'imin.s. ~ dnohell, or lltmlm.I;. "FIllce hay bales or olhe.r erosion CQll1rolJ doWIll11ope to cspturo mUoff CIII!}IiI1g JJlO1'tl;r 01' cement befhre it reaches the1ltmm dmin. " Recycle large chwJka ofbroklm concrete ata J.andlilI. "Neverbwy solid or hazardous Wll5U; l1ll!terial. H8il1ma PMut Pmdllc';$ ., Keep m1lliquid pa.lnt products and w:mes awa:y ftoo!. the ~ sm:et, ami. $'/om:l ~Liquid ~ from paint$,. illinners, lKllwntll, glues, and cleaning fluids are hmJroollS wasres and !1ll.lSi be ~ of at a. hazardous Wllll<<l collection fi!cil.ity (cOl1lOOt your weal stoImWlltel' program). m10 3 ,{ l'ropedy monitor and llIlliI:1tain ll1l erosion andsedimenl: controls. .f Properly:report fldI_ of erosi.on and ~ oomrolg 1n1h~ local stormWllierautborlty. .,rped'onn miljor equipment:repalrn away !rom the job site. "Do not ~ dJC$Cl oil to lubricale oc c111a1l.etj,uipmentorpllIls. ~ tor llOiJ IIlidpcmded ~tht.mq be <<m- tlUIlin.stOO. crete. If any of1hese coIlllilions are observed, teat fur contaminati.on mldcon:tlll.>t the:R~ Wllt;:;rQualliy Control Board: unUo"tl<l! soil crmdltions, dl8rol.oratioll or odor Abandoned underground l3nks Absndoned we1b! ~ Buried baIre13, <k~. ris, OC tmsh.. .t Fanvumr-basild paints,paint out ~ In fhe extent possible, Rinse to \he sanila1:y sewer oooe you :have gained ~ioo.fh>Dl the lo~d wasrewa~ tmltment aufuorlty. Neve.rpOlU'paint down a dmin. ..... For oil-~ ~ paint out brushes to the <:lctentpos-- sible audclean with thim:!erorsolvent in aproper("..ooI:Ww. Filter and reuse thinners and solvents. Dispose of excess liquid& and residue llll hazaIdOUll W1l.!lte. Paint mmovaJ "Paint chips and dust from tl.OXI.-hazlmiollll dry stripping Illlllsllllll blasting may be swept up or collected in plastic drop c.loths and disposed of as trash. ./ Schedule ~:md ez:cavat!on:projects for dryWeall.1C!'. ./ Protrot Slonn \!rain inlets 'with bai' bille" OOlIDll, filter mats or other inlet protectiOll. m~asures, au eXilcl1ent form of el'Olrlon COllil:ol for any " Dispose of IlIIUSed pesfr~deg as lllusrdQUll WllSte. ,{ Do :!lOt brow or me leav<'"lJ, ..-ro. into the stn:ct.. storm drain. tior4 o I S? KJ+I-f- ~I I ~~. b- p=~ >=-t:=, ~-I........J :==1= '--=l--- :=SL5P~= ~=== ,...-j =- H=_ !:::::,-= I~-- c:== H==,_ - - M...Jl:illj tt I II I I T " [ XI I ~ I I I ~ \.-"-- r= '-- 0 i=!= I:k=~~~~ )-:= -1= i= ,L- =l--- I-I:=: 1--1- ,- 1--, I=t==\-I=:=~........J 1=J=_-1===~ 1=lcl- =I:SU:~ I- =:: =r--o_ -1=1- _ ~ =!~=~===-=- ........J =,_ ---, I=- =t:=-=/= (f :=; ;=1= ,= =l;( ........J~ --7' - ,~r=I= I =1=[;1'( a- T I I ;? II L 24' -6- Ht- H 'H-tf-1+ H +1<11 ~ ~~11hy~1111 II m " T I I l.lASTFR ArDROOl.l J)-------l lJNOCClJPlrD Roor I iT rfT II 1 T I II T TT IT I I I Ii TI,I T T I II III II III I TlI T IT IT IITII II TIITIl, rrIT"] ~.lJIll jlJ Lll J ITJ I I I II 'IT IT IT II II T II TIll II lilT II 0. II II II I ~ Tll IT I T I I T II I I Lilli J U L I TTIII I T I I ill T I PROPOSED 3/F PLAN SCAli: 1/4"-1'-0" J- / / / / / = -E _I 1-:=1 =b==1 =\1b E~~~~\=It= -=-I=F+:= =r=~o~:=;1-= t=L-'= -01- ~L-,--:=h;:= L-t='--=Gt= t=1-=---'H-1- ;:::"::1=-=_ ;= 1=1=~L-t=1= llEl2RQQM ~ I ~ ~ PROPOSED 2/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4--1'-0- I '~ o I "~ Gl!ESl...8II2RQ I I l I ..J 0\ r II l i\'&IS.::l!:LC. II ~ ~ l II G III III g 1\ III _ l __ U ~~ ~ flillJ:: --O~ I ~ g II II _ --L .JL \j f. 7J \ I _ _ ACCESS PROPOSED G/F PLAN SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" BEST D DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAIN OFFICE IDO Old County Road, Suite I DOC Bri'b~t4~~':X~~~5~~";;~xB:r't~'5~1 ~D05 SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH OFFICE 2010 Ocean Avenue, Suite: D San F rnncisco, CA 94127 Tcl415-452-8676 Fax 415-452-3476 I ~ CONSTRUCTION OF 8 SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS 111 CHESTNUT AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA DATE 9/2007 REVISION SUBMIT FOR PERMIT DRAWN BY: PROJ, NO.: KS 204153-6 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS UNIT 6 SHEET NO, -1 15 OF 21 SHEETS Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: February 21,2008 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Time Extension of: 1) Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19. 2) Exceptions from the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lots sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right-of-way, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19. 3) Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78. 4) Design Review allowing for the construction a two-story eight (8) unit condominium development, in accordance the SSFMC Chapter 2085, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the High Density (R-3-L) Zone District. SSFMC: Title 19 and Chapters 20.78 & 20.85. Owner: United Ng Limited Partnership Applicant: Best Design Case No.: PCA8-0001 [P02-0020 [AHA02-0001, SA02-000, PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008] Env. Doc.: Negative Declaration ND02-0002 [Previously adopted by the City Council July 2005] RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve a 1) Five Month Time Extension of a Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, and Exceptions from the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lots sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right-of-way, 3) Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: PCA08-0001 111 Chestnut Avenue February 21, 2008 Page 2 of 4 per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, and 4) Design Review allowing for the construction a two-story eight (8) unit condominium development, in accordance the SSFMC Titles 19 & 20, subject to making the fmdings of approval and adopting the conditions of approval. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: At their October 24,2007 meeting, the City Council approved a Three-Month Time Extension in order to allow sufficient time for the applicant to meet with City staff, revise the Tentative Subdivision Map to incorporate a common area including the driveway, open parking and recreation areas, and revise the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions [CC&Rs] to reflect the map changes. The applicant has met with City staff, including representatives from the Building, Engineering and Planning Divisions, and the City Attorney's Office and revised the map and CC&Rs. The key change was to create a common area (rather than easements) providing each owner with an undivided interest in the common area, and providing that the control and maintenance of the common area will become the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. This concept will help avoid potential conflicts over use ofthe driveways, open parking and recreation areas that were associated with the use of easements, This approach has been successfully utilized in all of the similar residential developments approved by the City in the last 20+ years. In fulfillment of Condition of Approval # 9, the applicant has met with City staff and the property owner of 105 Chestnut A venue, Betty Robinson, and the latter has agreed to a fence design along the shared property boundary. The applicant has resubmitted Tentative Subdivision Map and is requesting a Time Extension with an expiration date of July 20, 2008. The SSFMC allows a maximum of a one-year time extension from the date of the expiration of the original two year approval. After the expiration of the one-year extension, the entitlements will expire and the applicant will need to re-file a new planning application to seek new entitlements from the City. The construction drawings have been plan checked and are ready to be issued. The Tentative Subdivision Map and CC&Rs have been extensively reviewed by City staff so that they are nearly in the format of a Pinal Subdivision Map (per state law a specific map format and a mandatory administrative review of the Final Subdivision Map by the City Council). This will streamline the Pinal Map review to a few weeks (instead of a several months) including preparation by the applicant and review by the City Engineer and the City Council. The project includes the construction of eight two-to-three story residential condominiums. Two of the dwellings will be restricted as affordable units. Parking will be provided on-site in individual garages and several open at-grade parking spaces. The site will be landscaped and will Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: PCA08-000 I III Chestnut Avenue February 21,2008 Page 3 of 4 provide decks attached to the units along with two play areas. The site is adjacent to other dwellings including multi-family and the new Oak Farms town home development. The plans attached to this staff report are the same ones approved by the City Council in 2005. Additional information regarding the residential development can be found in the previous City Council staff reports and meeting minutes. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration was approved for the proposed residential development by the City Council in July 2003, after having been duly noticed and circulated for 20 days for public review, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA]. No substantive comments were received during the original review and no comments have been offered during the time extension reviews. In City staffs opinion no significant changes in the environment and none in the proposed development that would warrant the necessity of revising and/or re-circulating the environmental document. Because the environmental document is judged to be relevant, in accordance with CEQA, the Planning Commission need take no further action. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map provides a common area that incorporates shared areas that will result in reducing ownership conflicts and the map changes have been reviewed by the representatives of the Building, Engineering and Planning Divisions, and the City Attorney's Office to ensure conformance with the City development standards. Therefore, the Planning Commission should recommend that the City Council approve a Five Month Time Extension of: 1) Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, 2) Exceptions from the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lots sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right of way, 3) Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, and 4) Design Review allowing for the construction a two-story eight (8) unit condominium development, in accordance the SSFMC Titles 19 & 20, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the High Density (R-3-L) Zone District. Attachments: Draft Planning Commission Resolution Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: PCA08-0001 111 Chestnut Avenue February 21,2008 Page 4 of 4 Draft Conditions of Approval City Council Staff Report October 10, 2007 Minutes October 10, 2007 Revised Tentative Subdivision Map & Plans Planning Commission Meeting of February 21, 2008 .. (Continue to March 6, 2008) Modification of a Type "C" Sign Permit for an increase in sign height and area for a Master Sign Program at 6000 Shoreline Court in the Planned Commercial (P-C-L) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20,24, 20.85 & 20,86, mm- I 555- PUBLIC HEARING 3. BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO/applicant United Ng Limited Part./owner 111 Chestnut Ave. PCA08-0001 Time Extension of a Tentative Subdivision Map allowing the subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Exceptions from the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lots sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right of way, in accordance the SSFMC Title 19, Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4,25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, Affordable Housing Agreement restricting twenty percent (20%) of the eight (8) units as affordable dwellings in accordance with SFMC Chapter 20.125, and Design Review allowing for the construction a two-story eight (8) unit condominium development, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the High Density (R-3-L) Zone District, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20,85 Project Nos,: P02-0020: AHA02-0001, RZ02-0002, SA02-0001 ,PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008 Vice Chairperson Teglia noted he would be abstaining from the item due to a conflict of interest. Public Hearing opened, Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report, Yolanda Manzoni, counsel for 111 Chestnut applicant, recalled that a 3 month extension was previously requested and are returning for an addition 5 month extension, She pointed out that they have fulfilled all the items brought up at the last meeting and the time extension will allow the finalization of the map without having the entitlements expire, Commissioner Prouty was concerned with projects not being built as approved and asked if the roof and parking issues the Commission had during the review of the project in 2003 were addressed, Senior Planner Carlson stated that the Commission's comments had been resolved and there were minor changes such as a double door not being replaced with a single door and sidelights, He pointed out that the roof lines are in conformity to what the Commission and Council had directed, Commissioner Zemke asked if July 20, 2008 is the date the extension expires. Senior Planner Carlson replied affirmatively and added that if the Commission had previously granted a one year extension it would have expired in July. Marc Teglia spoke as a resident against the project and added that the project is not the highest and best use for the site, He pointed out that it is not in the City's vision for the thoroughfare, He suggested that the Commission make the extension very strict if they decide to allow it but encouraged the Commission to deny the extension in order reanalyze the project. Public Hearing closed, S:\M"Vl.LiteS\O:2-:2i-oi? R.1>C M"Vl.Lites.cioc 1>VI:Je :2 of 5 Planning Commission Meeting of February 21, 2008 .. Ms, Manzoni clarified that all the delays with the exception of the change in ownership have been due to the applicant and the City working together to make the project what the Commission and Council approved at the site, She pointed out that the building permit is ready to be issued but will not be issued until the Parcel Map is finalized, She urged the Commission not to open the discussion to what can be done with the ,5 acre parcel if the extension were to be denied, Commissioner Sim asked if all loans and contractors have been secured for the project. Ms, Manzoni replied affirmatively, Chairperson Giusti questioned if the playground was protected or if it is open to the parking area, Senior Planner Carlson replied that the playground is surrounded by a fence and a gate in response to the Commission's comments. He clarified that the General Plan allows a minimum amount of units that can be proposed by a project and this one is at the minimum amount of units required, He further clarified that the Zoning Code does not require the Planning Commission's review of rental units for which the applicant could have proposed 14 units without going through a public hearing process, He concluded that this is a compromise and is consistent with the developments surrounding it. Commissioner Sim asked if the project would be constructed in phases, Commissioner Prouty questioned if there was a bond on the project requiring it to be completed, Charles Ng replied that their loan will allow them to due the project as one phase, Senior Planner Carlson added that we have not required building bonds as suggested by Commissioner Prouty, Commissioner Prouty questioned if the sewer system had been looked into by staff, Senior Planner Carlson replied that Planning met with Public Works to resolve any drainage and capacity issues, Commissioner Prouty stated for the record his opposition to the project due to the density on the lot and the entire area, He pointed out that the intersection at Commercial and Chestnut is busy and this project will increase traffic, Motion Zemke / Second Sim to approve PCA08-0001, Roll Call: Ayes: Commissioner Oborne, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Sim, Commissioner Zemke and Chairperson Giusti Commissioner Prouty Vice Chairperson Teglia None Noes: Abstain: Absent: Approved by majority voice vote, ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 4. 18 Month Review - Royal Auto Repair Yousef Mustafa/applicant Michael & Katie Hartmann/owner 1331 San Mateo Ave P06-0015: UP06-0005 18 month review of a Use Permit allowing an automotive repair facility, generating more than 100 average daily vehicle trips, with outside overnight vehicle storage, a fence and screen wall exceeding 3 feet in height in a minimum required front setback, in an existing 18,000 square foot industrial building, and Design Review of exterior changes to the building, parking lot, fence and landscaping at 1331 San Mateo Ave, in the M-1 Industrial Zone District, in accordance with SSFMC Sections 20,30,040 (a), 20.30,040 (b) and 20,73,020 (d)(1) & Chapters 20,81 & 20,85, S:\Mc",,,-tes\0:2-:21.-0g R.PC Mc",,,-tes.&1OC PClge 3 of 5 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, California, will hold a public hearing at its Regular Meeting on Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 7:30 p.In., in the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California, on items including the following applications, at which tin1e and place any and all persons interested Inay appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge in cOUIi the action taken by the City Council regarding the iten1s described below, you Inay be liInited to raising only those issues you or SOlneone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing specified below: Project #: PCA08-0001 BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO - Applicant United N g Limited Part. - Owner 111 Chestnut Ave. APN - 011312090 TiIne Extension of a Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Exceptions froIn the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lot sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right of way, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Residential Planned Unit Development Permit allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced minimum required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, and Design Review allowing for the construction of a two-story eight (8) unit condon1inium developInent, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.85, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the Multi-family Residential (R-3-L) Zone District. Project Nos.: P02-0020: RZ02-0002, SA02-0001, PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING I, Krista Matiinelli-Larson, ceIiify that I caused to be posted the notice of Public Hearing in the areas designated on February 29, 2008. That upon the instance of and for and on behalf of the City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, that I Inailed by first class n1ail ' Notice of Public Hearing' for: Project #: PCA08-0001 BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO - Applicant United Ng Lin1ited Part. - Owner 111 Chestnut Ave. APN - 011312090 Tin1e Extension of a Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and common area in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Exceptions froln the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lot sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right of way, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Residential Platu1ed Unit Developlnent Pe1111it allowing lot sizes smaller than the minimlun requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced IniniInuIn required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, and Design Review allowing for the construction of a two-story eight (8) unit condon1inium developn1ent, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.85, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the Multi-fan1ily Residential (R-3-L) Zone District. Project Nos.: P02-0020: RZ02-0002, SA02-0001, PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008 That your affiant deposited said envelope containing said Notice in the Post Office located in the City of South San Francisco on the 29th Day of February; and That there is regular United States mail service between the City of South San Francisco and the address of the receiver. (Sent out 339 envelopes) CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF HEARING I, Krista Martinelli-Larson, certify that I caused to be posted the notice of Public Hearing in the areas designated on February 29, 2008, That upon the instance of and for and on behalf of the City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, CalifoTI1ia, your affiant posted: Project #: PCA08-0001 BEST DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO - Applicant United Ng Lilnited Part. - Owner 111 Chestnut Ave. APN - 011312090 TiIne Extension of a Tentative Subdivision Map allowing a subdivision creating eight (8) parcels and C01l11110n area in accordance with SSFlVlC Title 19, Exceptions froln the SSFMC Title 19 allowing lot sizes less than 5,000 square feet and lots not fronting on a public right of'way, in accordance with SSFMC Title 19, Residential Plmmed Unit Developlnent Permit allowing lot sizes slnaller than the Ininimum requirement of 5,000 square feet and reduced miniInuln required setbacks, and parking at a rate of 3 spaces per dwelling unit instead of 4.25 spaces per dwelling unit, in accordance with SSFMC Chapter 20.78, and Design Review allowing for the constnlction of a two-story eight (8) unit condOlninium developlnent, in accordance with SSFl\1C Chapter 20.85, situated at 111 Chestnut Avenue (APN 011-312-090) in the Multi-fmnilyResidential (R-3-L) Zone District. Project Nos.: P02-0020: RZ02-0002, SA02-0001, PUD02-0002 and DR02-0008 Said notices were posted at the following places, which are within the boundaries of the City of South San Francisco. 400 Grand Avenue - City Hall 33 Arroyo Drive Municipal Services Building 315 Maple Avenue - City Hall Annex 840 West Orange Avenue Main Library 306 W alnut Avenue - Grand Avenue Library That said posting was fully completed on the Notice is attached hereto, - ~'t\l 5:14> G (~ c ~ ~ t,) 0 ~l~~~ Staff R~ort AGENDA ITEM # 9 DATE: March 12, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty VanDuyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, making rmdings and adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the .Miller Avenue Parking Structure. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On December 12, 2007 the City Council reviewed and provided comment on the schematic design plans for the Miller Avenue parking structure. At that meeting, the Council was also presented with an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the project. Due to a database error, an owner of adjacent property did not receive the required notice for the project. Since that meeting, staff has repaired the database error and recirculated the environmental document. In accordance with direction from the City Attorney, the document was revised to address comments received on January 8, 2008 from the a4jacent property owner and circulated a third time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Initial Study, prepared by staff, identified and discussed the impacts of the parking structure resulting in a Mitigated Negative Declaration being prepared for adoption. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached to the resolution as Exhibit A, concluded that while the project may have potentially significant impacts in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, and Noise, after implementation of the proposed mitiga.tion measures, the project would not result in any significant environmental impacts. Proposed mitigation has been incorporated into a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached to the resolution as Exhibit B. The 20 day comment period commenc:ed February 5, 2008 and ended February 25, 2008. Written comments were received on February 25,2008 from representatives of the owners of321 Miller Avenue and relate to the aesthetic impacts of the project and traffic circulation concerns. Staff has prepared a Staff Report Subject: (Miller Avenue Parking Stmcture) March 12, 2008 Page 2 of 4 written Response to Comments, and both the comments and staffs response are attached to this staff report as well as summarized below, Aesthetics The comment letter objects to the parking structure's aesthetic implications, including views from the west-facing windows of some of the apartments at 321 Miller Avenue and the shading effects of the structure on those windows. In response, staff notes that courts have generally found the obstruction of a few private views to be a less than significant impact. Additionally, the views that would be obstructed by the project are principally of a vacant parking lot and surrounding urban development. Any potential views of scenic resources such as San Bruno Mountain or Sign Hill are largely obstructed by existing structures and trees across Miller Avenue and would not be affected by the project. With regard to the shading effects of the project, the parking structure would not substantially affect shadows of the first floor windows, since those windows are already shaded by the existing duplex at 323 Miller and an existing 6' tall solid wood fence located on the property line, The west-facing second floor windows would be subject to increased shading during the afternoon hours due to the height of the proposed parking structure, The project was reviewed by the members of the Design Review Board during a Design Values Workshop and the structure's height was considered by Board members. The Board recommended the 4'l1 story structure now proposed. As proposed, the project complies with the General Plan's policies for Downtown, including the 60' height limit and encouragement oflot line to lot line commercial development, consistent with the traditional neighborhood form. In contrast, the existing structure at 321 Miller A venue includes residential use of the ground floor, thereby rendering it nonconforming with respect to the Gem:ra1 Plan Policies for Downtown Commercial properties, which require active commercial uses on the ground floor. As noted in the attached response to comments, staffs position is that such impacts on nonconforming uses should not constrain lawful development on adjacent parcels, In a previous hearing for the project and in the comment letter, it was suggested that the structure should be placed partially underground and Sl;:t back from the east property line, respectively, in order to alleviate their concerns. Staff notes that as proposed, the parking structure is configured with a number of "green" energy-saving features. Among these features, the geothermal climate control, natural ventilation and lighting would either be completely lost or substantially compromised by placing the parking structure underground. Undergrounding any of the parking would also necessitate an additional vehicular access point due to circulation requirements of a partially underground structure, This driveway could only be placed at either Miller Avenue, which would eliminate the ground floor commercial space; or Fourth Lane, which would create a dangerous pedestrian environment at the Maple A venue/F ourth Lane intersection. Finally, increasing the parking structur(:'s setback from the east property line has serious implications for the cost efficiencies of the project due to the impacts of modifying the ramping system. To place a Staff Report Subject: (Miller Avenue Parking Structure) March 12, 2008 Page 3 of 4 parking structure in a smaller building lmvelope, the ramping system would require more complicated forming and structural supports, resulting in a loss of parking spaces within the entire structure. For example, if a "speed ramping" system is required, the ability to park on inclining surfaces is lost due to the required slope of the ramps. According to the project designer, a setback of a size necessary to substantially reduce or eliminate the project's shading effects may render the entire project technically infeasible, cost impacts notwithstanding. Traffic The comment letter also challenges the traffic analysis prepared for the project, focusing on the vehicular circulation characteristics of Fourth Lane and how these characteristics may be affected by the parking structure. The existing condition along Fourth Lane at the project site includes four separate access driveways to the Lane. Due to the configuration of the existing surface parking lots, each parking instance accommodated by the 60 spaces in these three lots requires a trip to a segment of Fourth Lane. This is because the parking lots afford one-way travel only, with two parking lots exiting to the Lane and one entering from the Lane. Moreover, the l~xisting duplex at 323 Miller includes parking spaces accessible only from Fourth Lane, The proposed parking structure would eliminate all of these existing access points, possibly replacing them with a loading area. The loading area would be intended to allow small commercial trucks to service the proposed ground floor commercial space without blocking the lane while providing an area for trash enclosures and other utility functions. The structure therefore would reduce the vehicle trips on Fourth Lane. Further, as demonstrated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the project would not significantly impact service levels at local intersections. Thus, the project as proposed improves many characteristics of the current circulation conditions in the Lane, without significantly impacting City traffic. CONCLUSION As proposed, the project provides sevl::lral benefits to the City, including elimination of a currently underutilized lot, increased parking revenue, increased tax revenue and increased activity in the Downtown area, and is consistent with the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan polices applicable to Downtown that seek to strengthen the Downtown's presence as the City's traditional commercial core. The analysis contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration demonstrates that as mitigated, the project will not have any significant environmental impacts. Comments received on the project did not identify any new significant impacts. Accordingly, staff does not believe that there exists any substantial evidence on the whole of the record supporting a fair argument that the proposed project may have significant environmental effects. Staff Report Subject: (Miller Avenue Parking Stmcture) March 12, 2008 Page 4 of 4 Staff therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, making findings and adopting the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project. ~" Marty VanDuyn Assistant City Mana r ~~ Barry Nagel City Manager By: MVD:SK:cs:bla Attachments: Resolution Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Hannig Law Firm - Written Comments received 1/8/08 Hannig Law Firm - Written Comments received 2/25/08 Response to Comments dated 3/7/08 1065368.1 RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco proposes to develop a public parking structure consisting of a 4'l'2 story building containing 256 parking stalls and up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor commercial space and related improvements, on 24,500 square feet ofland area located on the south side of the 300 block of Miller Avenue in the City of South San Francisco ("Project"); and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, SS 21000, et seq" a mitigated negative declaration (MND), incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit A, was prepared analyzing the potential environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, a previous MND for the Project, dated December 20, 2007, was circulated for public review from December 20" 2007 to January 8, 2008, during which time comments were received on the Project concerning the MND's analysis of aesthetic and traffic impacts; and WHEREAS, comments received on the original MND prompted staff to obtain additional expert analysis regarding shadow impacts of the Project, and re-evaluate the Project's traffic impacts; and WHEREAS, the revised analyses confirmed that the Project would not have significant aesthetic or traffic impacts; and WHEREAS, the revised MND was recirculated for another public review period from February 5,2008 to February 25,2008; and WHEREAS, additional comments regarding the project's aesthetic and traffic impacts were received during the comment period for the recirculated MND, to which staff prepared a response letter, attached to this Resollution as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the Project will have potentially significant impacts to air quality, cultural resources, and noise, for which mitigation measures have been proposed and incorporated into a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit B, which mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to less than significant; and WHEREAS, revisions to the Project and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ensure that the Project's environmental impacts will be reduced to a level ofless-than- significant; and lU:)UId!nb:) UO!PrulSUO:) S:)SOdUI! s: I :)lnse:)w uoqe1imW 'PMI lUR:)y!ffiJ!S ueql sS:)I e Ol SUO!SS!UI:) l~neUI ~WIn:)!lled s,l:)~fold ~l{l ~:)np~l IUA'\ S~lllse~UI :)s:)1U 'p:)fOld :)qllOJ spelluo:) uoq:)t\.Ilsuo:) U! p:)pnpu! :)q S:)lllse~UI Uo!ss:)lddns lsnp awavvs: :)l!nb:)l IUA'\ VI :)lllse:)w UO!le1iq!w 'p:)fOld :)qllOJ 1iU!PRU} 1iu!lnp P:)l13:)l:) :)q PIno:) SUO!ssfUI:) lsneqx:) uoq:mllSUO:) pUB lsnp IeqUBlsqns 's:)q!A!pe IeAoUI:)l1iU!lllP P:)W:)l:) lsnp:)l{l Ol uomppe UI 'sluelnnod l!e 1iuqe:)l:) 10J {l1!lU:)lOd ~rq e l{l!A'\ Al!Aq:)e UO!pt\.Ilsuo:) e S! S:)ltlpt\.IlS pUB WI 1iu~.rnd 1iuqS!X~ :)ql JO JUAOUI:)l Ie:)!sAqd :)q.t - tfmono .lJV 'e :SA'\OnOJ se 'PA:)I lUB:)y!ffiJ!S-UBql-ss:)I e Ol p:)le1imUI :)q IUA'\ ':):)ll{l AJUO :).rn :)l:)ql q:)!qA'\ JO 'SpedUI! lUB:)y!ffiJ!S AneqU:)lOd 'lU:)WU01!AU:) :)ql UO P:)JP lUB:)y~!S e :)Aeq IUA'\ 'p:)le1imUI se 'p:)fOld P:)SOdOld :)ql Wl{l P10:):)1 :)ql UO :):)U:)P!A:) IeqUBlsqns ou S! :).I:)q.L . t: 'p:)fOld :)quo sl:)edUI! ~l{l p~q!l:)s:)p APlenb:)pe pue 's:)u!pp!no 1iuqU:)UI:)IdUI! ~ql pUB va3:;) ql!A'\ :):)URHdUIO:) U! P:)l:)IdUIo:) u:):)q seq CINW :)q.L "l 'S!SAIeUR pUB lu:)u.riJpnf lU:)pu:)d:)pu! s, Ipuno;) Al!~) :)ql SlU:)S:)ld:)l '800l 'I A.rnruq:)d p:)lep 'aNW ~q.L . I :SA'\OnOJ se spuy iCq:)l:)q H:)unO;) Al!;) :)ql '1iUq:):)UI H:)unO;) Al!;) 800Z 'Zllp.rnW :)qllOJ p:).rnd:)ld Sllod:)l pUB s:~lnU!UI 'epu:)1ie '1ilI!l:):)UI H:)unO;) AH;) 800Z 't:l AnmUR f :)l{llOJ p:)led:)ld Sllod:)l pUB s:)lnU!UI 'epU:;l1ie '1iUq:):)UI Ipuno;) Al!;) LOOl 'Zll:)qUI:):):)a :)qllOJ p:)leckud Sllod:)l pUR s:)lnU!UI 'epu:)1ie 'uo!ss:)s APlllS H:)unO;) Al!;) LOOl 'vI l:)qUI:)AON :)qllOJ p:).rnd:)ld Sllod:)l pUB 's:)lnU!UI 'epu:)ge 'JJelS Aq p:).rnd:)ld SlU:)UIUIO:) Ol :)SUOdS:)l :)ql pUB uoqelep~a :)Aqe1i~N p~le1imw :)ql uo P:)A!:):):)l SlU:)UIUIO:) ':)l11l:)t\.IlS 1iu~.rnd :)nU:)A V l:)IUW :)qllOJ 800l 'I A.mruq:)d p:)lep pUB p:).rnd:)ld uoqelep:)a :)Aqe1i:)N p:)le1imW:)l{l ':)l11l:)t\.IlS 1iu~.rnd :)nu:)AV l:)IUW :)qllOJ LOOl 'L l:)qUI:):):)a p:)wp pUB p:).rnd:)ld SURId ffiJ!s:)p 'UO!lel!UIH lnoql!A'\ s:)pnpu! q:)!qA'\ 'l! :)lOJ:)q P10:):)1 :)ql JO Al:)lqU:) :)ql uo p:)seq lel{l <I:IA'lOSnI H3:H1.lIfltl1.I 3:0: 'uoqnIOS:)l S!ql JO :J.IBd e :)peUl pUB P:)llO:) pUB :)rul:).rn SIel!:):)l 1iU!01i:)lOJ :)qllel{l <I:IA'lOSnI 1.1 3:0: 'nIOilnI3:H1. 'MON .V;) 'O:)S!:)UBld UBS qlnoS ':)nU:)A V :)Idew ~ I t:'O:)SPUBld UBS qlnos JO Al!;) :)ql JO UO!S!A!a 1iU'!1JlIBId 'l:)UUBId P!q;) :)ql S! p:)fOld :)qllOJ s1iU!P:):):) old JO P10:):)1 :)l{l :)llllqsuO:) lel{l SlU:)UIn:)OP 1:)l{l0 pUB s:)SUOdS:)l pue SlU:)UIUIO:) 1iu!pnpu! 'a.NW :)quo UB!pOlsn:) pUB uoqe:)oI:)l{l 'SVtnItlHM pUB :(S:):)UBU!P10 1iU!llOZ) Ol :)HU :)pO;) Ied!:)!llnW O:)SpURld ues qlnoS pUR 'UBId lU~UIdopA:)P:)lI IellU~;);UA'\OlUA'\Oa :)l{l 'e:).rn-qns 1iU'!1JlIBId UA\OlUA\Oa :)ql Ol :)Iqe:)Hdde UBId Iel:)u:)D 666 I :)l{l JO s:)!:)!Iod :)qll{l!A'\ lU:)lS!SUO:) S! P:)SOdOld se p:)fOld :)l{l 'SV3:lItlHM. pUB :p:)fOld :)l11l:)t\.IlS 1iuPI.rnd :)nU:)A V l:)IHW :)ql UIO.y SpedUI! IelU~UlU01!AU:) 10J Iequ:)lod :)l{l uo S!SAIeUB pUB lU:)uUJpnf lU:)pu:)d:)plI! s,H:)unO;) Al!;) :)ql SP:)IPl 's:)SUOdS:)l pUB SlU:)UIUIO:) 1iu!pnpu! 'aNW :)ql 'SV3:lI3:HM. measures that will operate to reduce impacts from construction exhaust to a 1ess-than-significant level. Accordingly, the Project, as mitigated will not have any significant air quality impacts. b. Cultural Resources - Development ofthe parking structure as proposed would necessitate the removal of an existing residential duplex locally listed as a "potentially historic resource". Removal of this structure could constitute a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of the resource. Mitigation Measure 2 requires preparation and implementation of a Preservation Plan that will require relocation or salvage and re-use of the historical materials in the structure. This Mitigation Measure ensures that the historical character of the structure will not be lost. Therefore, the Project, as mitigated, will not have any significant impacts on cultural or historical resources. c. Noise - Construction of the project would result in temporary noise increases due to operation of heavy equipment. Mitigation Measure 3 requires that the restrictions on construction activities promulgated by the City of South San Francisco's Noise Ordinance be incorporated into bid documents for the Project, thereby limiting the hours of operation and noise generation of individual pieces iDf equipment to acceptable levels. Therefore, the Project, as mitigated, will not have any significant noise impacts, 4. The Project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat offish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, or threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. It does not reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. It does not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history because there is no identified area at the Project site which is habitat for rare or endangered species, or which represents unique examples of CalifiDrnia history or prehistory, In addition, the Project is within the scope of use contemplated in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and the Project does not have any significant, unavoidable adverse impacts. Implementation of specified mitigation measures will avoid or reduce the effects of the Project on the environment and thereby avoid any significant impacts. 5. The Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage oflong-term environmental goals, 6. The Project does not involve impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, because the described Project will incorporate mitigation measures to avoid significant impacts of the Project in the context of continued growth and development in the City of South San Francisco. 1065012.1 I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a Public Hearing held on the 12th day of March, 2008 by the following vote: * * * * * * * * * * * * BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration consisting of attached Exhibit A and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program consisting of attached Exhibit B for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure Project. 7. The Project does not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the proposed development will enhance and complement the existing traditional commercial core ofthe City and improve the appearance ofthe area, all adverse effects ofthe Project will be mitigated to an insignificant level. DIRBCf DIAL: (650) 482-3084 HANNIC; '. . . , ,0 , > ;;, .' . I.a\\. hirm i'll' . . , PARTNERS: TED J. HANNIG JOHN H. BLAKE Eu.EN B. HAAs WILLIAM R. WAItHtJRST4' John H. Blake Partner ~ jhb@hamliglaw.com CORNER OF SELBY LANE/ATHERTON AND EL CAMINO REAL/REDWOOD CITY www.hanniglaw.com 2991 EL CAMINO REAL REDWOOD CITY, CA 94061-4003 TELEPHONE (650) 482-3040 FACSIMILE (650) 482-2820 ASSOClAT1lS: PETER W. DANIEL LoRI A. ItISH DAVID M. SHBSGREEN DAVID M, WOOLPB *AJ)MITI'EI) IN NEVADA '" CUJJloItN1A Via u.s. Mail, Fax and E-Mail January 8, 2008 Chadrick Smalley Associate Planner City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Comments by Owners of321 Miller Avenue to Mitigated Negative Declaration for Proposed Miller Avenue Parking Structure, under California Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code ~~21000-21177 1. Introduction This firm represents the owners of the ten-unit apartment building located at 321 Miller Avenue in South San Francisco (the "321 Miller Owners"), which is adjacent to the proposed project on the south east side. This is the right side of the project as viewed in figure 2 "Preliminary Site Plan" in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The 321 Miller Owners, who were not properly notified of the status of the project, still voiced objection to the proposed project at the December 12, 2007 meeting.! On December 12, 2007 the City Council began to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has not been approved and this matter is on the Council's January 23 agenda. This letter focuses on (1) the need for a consideration of a set-back on the east side of the proposed parking structure because of the devastating aesthetic impact of a four and a half story structure situated mere feet from the windows of a residential structure, and (2) the traffic impact of the project and the shortcomings in the traffic element of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 1 There are no meeting minutes available for the December 12 hearing as of the date of this letter, The 321 Owners have obtained and reviewed a DVD recording of the meeting, and references in this letter are to the time stamp on that DVD. {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068.DOC.l} (9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068.DOC.l } 2 The wall is one story high and there is a sloping roof on this structure. Those decisions and the authorities cited therein state, rather, that private views should be considered in the CEQA process, with a consideration of the number of views affected and the proximity of the obstruction bearing on the determination of the significance of the impact. Each Staff cites two appellate court decisions, neither of which make such a statement. Staff cites Banker's Hill Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San Diego (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 249 and Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Ca1.App.4th 572. Staff's statement at page 14 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration that "to the extent that any private views are impacted by the proj ect CEQA does not protect such views, particularly when situated in an urban setting" is an incorrect statement of the law. Views from the inside of 321 Miller Avenue are part of the aesthetic issues that CEQA was created to protect. The CEQA Guidelines give content to the concept of aesthetics by including the following questions in the checklist of a project's potential environmental effects: "Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?" and "Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?" (Guidelines, Appendix G, questions lea) and I(c).) The City is incorrect to dismiss the impact of the project on the view from 321 Miller Avenue. This impact should be evaluated in any environmental review, and if deemed significant, should be the basis of an EIR. Photo 1 shows the proximity of the apartment building at 321 Miller Avenue (on the left) to the existing building one-story building2 at 323 Miller Ave., which will be replaced by the parking lot wall, four and a half stories high. The parking structure, ifbuilt as proposed, would be taller than the top of the frame of the photo. 2. The Miti!:ated Neeative Declaration Is Deficient Because It Contains No Consideration Or AnalYsis Of The Total Elimination of the Views From The_Windows 10311 Miller Ayenue Directlv Facine: The Parkin!: Structure. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is deficient because it does not contain the requisite level of accuracy and analysis. If the City relies upon this flawed document it risks a successful legal challenge under CEQA. Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Two II :\ ~ ~ I (; -- 1.:1\\ ri r Tll II\Y\(C -- , I :1\\ I illll ,', Chadrick Smalley January 8,2008 Page Three of these cases indicates that factual analysis is necessary and that each situation should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Decisions cited by the Court of Appeal in the Bowman opinion further demonstrate this requirement. In Ocean View Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Montecito Water Dist. (2d Dist. 2004). 116 Cal.App.4th 396. 402. the court wrote: "The District cites nothing in CEQA that relieves it from considering the impact of the project on private views. To say there is no common law right to a private view. is not to say that the District is relieved from considering the impact of its project on such views.... That a project affects only a few private views may be a factor in determining whether the impact is significant." In Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside (4th Dist,. 2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 477.492, the court wrote: "aesthetic issues. such as public and private views. are properly studied in an EIR to assess the impacts of a project." Further. the cases cited by Staff are factually distinguishable and the projects in those cases had nowhere near the impact of this project. In the Banker's Hill case. the project proponent voluntarily implemented significant setbacks to its project to minimize the impact on neighbors. Banker's Hill, supra at 272. In Bowman. the nearest residential property was 50 feet away from the project, and the project proponent took steps to minimize shading impacts. Bowman, supra at 585. In Ocean View Estates. the private residences surrounded a reservoir but did not abut a tall structure the way that 321 Miller does. Ocean View Estates. supra at 399. In contrast, the residents of321 Miller Avenue will likely not even be able to see the sky through those windows if the project is built as proposed. Accordingly, the severely obstructed views of the residents of321 Miller Avenue from the windows facing the wall of the parking structure should be considered and mitigated under CEQA. The City should analyze the impact of the placing of a four and a half story structure mere feet away from residential windows. Appropriate mitigation measures may include but are not limited to an appropriate set-back. 3 . The Miti!!ated Ne!!ative Declaration Is Deficient Because It Contains No Consideration Of Shadows And Shadin!! Issues Resultin!! From Locatin!! A Four and Half StOry Structure Only Five Feet Awav From An Existin!! Residential Structure. Shadows and shading are potential significant environmental effects under CEQA. The City has failed to even consider the impact of the large parking structure on the neighboring properties. The Court of Appeal for the First District has written: "We presume that many if not {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068.DOC.l} {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068.DOC.l} With regard to traffic impacts, the Mitigated Negative Declaration is inadequate in the following ways: First, the Mitigated Negative Declaration relies on a February 7, 2007 traffic The California Code of Regulations identifies transportation and traffic as environmental factors that should be considered in the CEQA process. The Mitigated Negative Declaration fails to even identify traffic issues as a potentially significant impact of the project requiring mitigation. This conclusion is unsupported by the requisite level of analysis, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration cannot legally be approved. 4. The Mitie:ated Nee:ative Declaration Does Not Contain a Sufficient Analysis of Traffic Im)!acts. The City should consider reasonable mitigation measures including but not limited to set- backs to reduce the effect of this significant impact. The current Mitigated Negative Declaration ignores this issue and is, therefore, deficient. Other CEQA decisions support the position that shadows and shading should be taken into consideration. In Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside (4 Dist. 2004) 119 Cal.app.4th 477, 494, the Court of Appeal upheld the findings of a city that approved a project that was "sensitive to the adjacent use and was designed to preserve adjacent "private views, where feasible." That city took the neighbors into consideration by undertaking a shading study, which concluded that no on-site mitigation was required because the project would have no sun shadow effects. Other cases in which shadows and shading were considered as potential significant environmental impacts include Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. City of Los Angeles, (2d Dist., 2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385, 1389; and A Local & Regional Monitor v. City of Los Angeles (2d Dist.,1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 630, 642. The shading and shadowing caused by a sheer 60 foot high wall just 5 feet from the windows of the 321 Miller Avenue apartments will be nearly absolute. It will look like a prison, and little if any sunlight will enter the apartment windows. See again Photo 1, which shows the proximity of the apartment building at 321 Miller Avenue to the existing building at 323 Miller Ave., which will be replaced by the parking lot wall, four and a half stories high. The proposed project's shading will be substantial and should be mitigated. most urban developments will have some shading effects on nearby properties, and that those effects, if sufficiently substantial, could represent a significant environmental impact." Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4t1i 572,586. Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Four IJc\~\I(; . -- I :1\\ linll 1I,\Y\lC ~ 1..1\\ I inn ,,' Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Five study by the Crane Transportation Group that completely ignores the traffic impact on Fourth Lane, the narrow one-way alley that borders the project on the south side. Second, the Traffic Study is based on an estimate of the office space square footage that has since been significantly revised upward. The traffic study must be revised to address these issues before it can form the basis of any traffic conclusions in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. In addition, City staff stated on the record that several traffic-related issues raised by the public and the Council members would be addressed at a later date. As explained below, this violates CEQA. 4.a. Descriotion Of Fourth Lane Corridor and Traffic Impacts. Fourth Lane is an important corridor to the 321 Miller owners and their tenants.3 It is a narrow one-way alley (see Photos 2 and 3) spotted with vehicles, some parked legally, some not. The back side of321 Miller appears in Photo 4 on the right side, with a red truck parked alongside. The ten-space parking area for 321 Miller Avenue is accessible only from Fourth Lane. Residents leaving the parking area at 321 Miller must turn right and travel west (away from the photographer) because Fourth Lane is a one-way alley. Photos 4 and 6 show a common occurrence; a person stopping their car behind the St. Vincent DePaul Society (street address 344 Grand Ave) in order to donate items. The 321 Miller Owners and their tenants attest that it is not uncommon to see more than one car in this area as people queue to drop off donations. Directly across the alley from this point, Photo 5 shows a shed at the location of the south east comer of the project area. According to the Preliminary Site Plan, this is where the Loading Area will be. At the December 12 hearing the architect suggested that delivery or trash trucks might back into this loading area, if it is used for loading at al1.4 Such a driving maneuver would be challenging under the best of conditions because of the narrow alleyway, and Photos 4 and 6 show that it would be impossible if there was a car (or two) parked behind St. Vincent De Paul. It is not hard to imagine what would happen on that alley if more than one delivery truck arrived at the same time. Businesses on Grand Avenue which back onto Fourth Lane on this block also include a grocery store, a bakery, and a hardware store. 3 The photographs of Fourth Lane were taken at about 3:00 pm on January 5, 2008. 4 12/12/07 Meeting, minute 2:33-2:35. {9009:TEMP:PWD:HOO64068.DOC,l} {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068,DOC.l} The February 2007 traffic study cited in the Mitigated Negative Declaration stated that there would be 9200 feet of office space, and since that time the project has been changed so that there is now 13,700 feet of office space (a nearly 50% increase). 4.c.1. The Project Now Has 50% More Office Space Square Footage than Qriginallv Estimated in the Traffic Report. Two significant changes have occurred since the production of the traffic study by Crane in February 2007 which render the study inaccurate. The City risks a violation of CEQA if it tries to rely on an inaccurate traffic study. The traffic study must be revised. 4.c. The Traffic Studv Relied Upon Bv The Prolect ProoonentsJs NQt Accurate Because It Relies On Outdated Facts And Assumptions. In spite of Crane's conclusion that only intersections should be studied, an adequate study can consider both intersections and road segments. Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thomley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 755-6. Thus it is entirely appropriate and necessary to evaluate traffic patterns in Fourth Lane. The City's failure to adequately describe existing traffic conditions renders it impossible to properly analyze project impacts. See Galante Vineyard v, Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1122 (in which the description of traffic and other impacts was found to be inadequate). 4,b. The Mitigated Negative Declaration Should Have Considered These Traffic Impacts and the Failure To Do So Violates CEOA. Photos 6, 7 and 8 also show a man on a ladder and several trash dtunpsters in the alleyway, further illustrating the uses and activities on Fourth Lane. The photos also show a ntunber of utility poles in the alley, which should be removed (and the utilities placed underground) as part of any approved project as mitigation for traffic impacts in Fourth Lane. 1bis potential bottleneck is right where the exiting residents of321 Miller Avenue are forced to go because of the one-way alley. This impossible (and impassible) situation is likely to happen on a regular basis. Chadrick Smalley January 8,2008 Page Six I 10\ \ "I (; ~ 1;1\\ Ii 1"111 ." 11.\,\,\1(; . -- , " ;1 \\ I i rill "" . Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Seven Without any facts in supoort. the Mitigated Negative Declaration states: "Though the project contains 4,500 more square feet of commercial space than originally analyzed by the traffic study, this difference would not represent a material change in project impacts." This conclusion is not supported by any data or explanation. On the other hand, professional transportation engineers and major city governments understand that an increase in square footage leads to an increase in trip generation (See: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Journal 7th Edition; see also, San Diego Municipal Code, Land Development Code, Trip Generation Manual 2003). The First District Court of Appeal would likely disagree with Crane's conclusion. In American Canyon Community Unitedfor Responsible Growth v. City of American Canyon (1 st Dist.2006), 145 Cal.App.4th 1062, the Court of Appeal held that a city's reliance on a low square footage estimate, rather than a higher and more accurate estimate, in order to make traffic projections, was not supported by substantial evidence and violated CEQA. The court wrote: "The City's low calculation of the (project's) square footage fatally undermines its conclusion that the (project) would have no significant effects on traffic requiring supplemental environmental review." 4.c. 2. The Traffic Study Presumed that Traffic Would Exit Onto Fourth Lane. Which is No Longer the Case. The February 2007 traffic study cited in the Mitigated Negative Declaration presumed that cars would be exiting onto Fourth Lane, which is no longer the case. Figure 8 of the Crane Traffic Report contemplates that a number of cars will be exiting the parking structure onto Fourth Lane. Since the report, the City has changed the plan so that all exiting vehicles will exit on Miller Avenue This impact is amplified because of the increased square footage as described above. Because of this new information the Crane Traffic Study does not support a "no significant impact" finding on the traffic issue. The errors and omissions in the Crane Study discussed above result in an incomplete, distorted-and hence inaccurate--picture of the project's traffic impact. {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068,DQC,l} {9009:TEMP:PWD:HOO64068.DOC.l} 5 12/12/07 Meeting, minute 2:33-2:35. There is "a low threshold requirement for preparation of an EIR" (No Oil, Inc. v, City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68,84) and a "preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review" (Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4tlt 1307, 1316- 1317). An EIR must be prepared ''whenever it can be fairly argued on the basis of substantial evidence that the project may have significant environmental impact" (No Oil, Inc, supra at 75) even if there is substantial evidence to the contrary (Arviv. Enterprises, Inc. v, South Valley Area Planning Comm, (2002) 10ICal.App. 4th 1333, 1346. An EIR provides detailed information about the likely effect a proposed project may have on the environment, lists ways in which significant effects might be minimized and indicates alternatives to the project. Public Resources Code ~ 21061. An EIR is required whenever there is a " 'fair argument' " that significant impacts may occur. Quail Botanical Gardens Foundation, Inc. v, City of Ene in it as (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602. For the reasons discussed above, the 321 Miller Owners urge the Council to withhold approval of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to fully consider the impacts caused by building a 60 foot wall just five feet away from the windows of an existing residential apartment building, and the traffic impacts of the project. Adequate mitigation is required for significant impacts, and if this is impossible an EIR should be considered pursuant to 14 CCR ~ 15162. 5. Conclusion It would be wrong and illegal to make a decision now and wait until after the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been approved to determine how the loading area would be used. Reliance on future analysis to determine whether impacts are significant violates CEQA. [See, e.g., Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296.] At the December 12 hearing the architect suggested that the area designated as the 'Loading Area' has not been specifically programmed,S and it is not clear to what use that area will be put. This is significant because loading activities are likely to spill onto Fourth Lane, and impact the residents of321 Miller Avenue and others. 4.c. 3. There Should be No Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration Until the City Decides whether the Loading Space Will Actually be Used for LoadinlZ Or Not. As this Decision Will Have Traffic Impacts. Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Eight IIA\\I(; ~ 1;1\\ linll 11-\'\'\1(; '. " > I..,,; 111'11'1 ., ." > > Chadrick Smalley January 8, 2008 Page Nine The time is right for further review, as the Council has made no decision on the project, and no notice of detennination has issued. Traffic issues in this area are a high priority for the City and its citizens, and traffic impacts should be thoroughly analyzed in compliance with the law. Encl.: Photos 1-8 cc: Client {9009:TEMP:PWD:H0064068,DOC.l} PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 ~, ~~ t J \1. \ PHOTO 4 ~:o,;..,:r:t~!<;""'~<'.'''''' PHOTO 5 ~ PHOTO 7 \ \ \ , .I J/ \ PHOTO 8 Peter W. Dauiel &aoc:illte Attomey c~,fl>\.]\n~-It.;.,,. . ""'," ~ '~. 1" , r' f - r' .' ,'," 'J o~l \\' hi .-.11 \'"'' '. ': ~ ~!. PARTNI!II~, TED]. HANNIG ]OHN H. BlAEB El.LEN B. HAAs WIu..w.! R. WAllHlJRSTI' DIRECT DlALl 650/482-3039 CORNE.R OP SE.LBY LANE/ ATHERTON AND EL CAMINO REAL/RBDWOOD CrTY www.hannil!law.com 2991 EL CAMINO REAL REDWOOD CITY, CA 94061.4003 TELEPHONE (650) 482.3040 FACSIMILE (650) 482-2820 ASSOCIATR.~' PE'rJm W. DANIEL LoRI A. XIsH DAVID M. SHBSGImEN DAVID M. WOOLPE E:l!Wl. pwd@harmiglaw.com ~INNEv.AIlA" CAuPoIlNlA By Facsimile, U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail February 25, 2008 Chadrick Smalley Associate Planner City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Comments by Owners of321 Miller Avenue to Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration Dated February 1,2008 for Proposed Miller Avenue Parking Structure, Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code 9921000-21177 1. Introduction. This firm represents the owners of the ten-unit apartment building located at 321 Miller Avenue in South San Francisco (the "321 Miller Owners"), which is adjacent to the proposed project on the south east side. This is the right side of the project as viewed in figure 2 "Preliminary Site Plan" in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. In order to comply with CEQA, City Planning Department Staff has prepared a revised Mitigated Negative Declaration which will shortly be under consideration. The most recent version of this document is dated February 1,2008. The previous version of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was dated December 20, 2007. No Mitigated Negative Declaration has been approved. This comment is directed at the February 1, 2008 revised Mitigated Negative Declaration. On January 8, 2008, the 321 Miller Owners submitted comments to the prior version of the {ZAMM:2054:PWD:H0066285.DOC.! } {ZAMM:2054:PWD:H0066285.DOC.1} Put simply, the proposed Project will be a very tall four and a half story building, located just a few feet away from a neighboring residential building which is only half as tall. Several tenants of the 321 building MIl now have a flat wall just a few feet away, directly across from their windows, and looming more than two stories directly above. This will block out nearly all direct and indirect exterior light from these windows. 2. The Revised Mitieated Neeative Declaration Is Inadeauate In That It Fails To Adeauatelv Discuss The ImD8cts OfPuttin!!' A TaU Duildin!!' So Close To ANe~hborin!!' Residential BJIildine. Eliminatine All Li!!'ht and View. Because these matters have not been adequately addressed in the current Mitigated Negative Declaration, this letter focuses on (1) the need for a consideration of a set-back on the east side of the proposed parking structure because of the devastating aesthetic impact ofa four and a half story structure situated mere feet from the windows of a residential structure, and (2) the traffic impact of the project and the shortcomings in the traffic element of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (1) Inform governmental decisionmakers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities; (2) Identify the ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced; (3) Prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the changes to be feasible; and (4) disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved the project in the manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved. (CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal.Code Regs. 15002) As an informational document, the revised Mitigated Negative Declaration is a slight improvement. For example, the new document does illustrate more clearly the significant shadow impacts on 321 Miller. Overall, however, the document still falls short of what the public should expect from their government pursuant to the "General Concepts" of CEQA, which are to: City's Mitigated Negative Declaration. The 321 Miller Owners incorporate and reserve all comments made regarding the prior version of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Chad rick Smalley February 25, 200S Page Two 'JI~\X:\.IG' ;',' ;~;: "I h: ~",:i i;:';' . .., . ' ~. l' ~ ~ ~ . \ f , ,_ . ',,.1'.:1\\ 1,11;111 (" ',_ t , '... -", Chadrick Smalley February 25, 2008 Page Three Staff attempts to parse the "shading" issue from the ''vista'' issue, but the two issues are intertwined and should be considered together to accord with CEQA principles. Orinda Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 1145, 1171-2. Now that the Mitigated Negative Declaration includes some graphics on shading it is clear that these windows directly facing the project on both sides will lose most or all of the direct sunlight they now receive. Making matters worse, the windows will lose indirect, ambient light because of the sheer size of the project wall and the close proximity to the windows. The problem. is not that these people will lose a view of a mountain, or of a body of water, or a valley, examples of the vistas in dispute in reported CEQA court opinions. Here, the project will stamp out any view of any kind from these windows. The only view these people will have is the bare wall of the parking structure just a few feet away. At the very least, the Council should require adequate mitigation measures for this project such as a reasonable setback from the neighboring property line to allow some minimally acceptable amount of light tp remain. 3. The Revised Mitieated Neeative Declaration Is Inadeauate In That It Fails To Adeauatelv Discuss The Project's Traffic Impacts on Fourth Lane. As was discussed in the 321 Miller Owners January 8 comment letter, the tenants of 321 Miller are forced to turn right (north) on Fourth Lane in order to exit the apartment building. The tenants will not be able to exit if there is a delivery truck in the way. Modifications to the auto exitplan from the structure (Mitigated Negative Declaration, page 51) and the new requirement for underground utilities in the alley (Mitigated Negative Declaration, page 52) are improvements over previous iterations of the plan. However, the current Mitigated Negative Declaration is still flawed in that it fails to adequately discuss the impact of the loading / delivery area on the Fourth Lane alleyway. The traffic study discusses cars coming into and out of the parking lot, but does not adequately discuss the delivery trucks that will be coming into the ally, leaving the alley, and parking in the alley itself while making deliveries. lIDs is all the more critical since the office space square footage has been increased so dramatically to over 13,700 square feet. Traffic impacts of delivery trucks are appropriate items for analysis under CEQA See: National Resources Defense Council v. City of Los Angeles (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 268, 279 {ZAMM:20S4:PWD:H006628S.DOC.l } {ZAMM:2OS4:PWD:H006628S.DOC.l} I There are no meeting minutes available for the December 12 hearing as of the date of this letter. The 321 Owners have obtained from the City a DVD recording of the meeting, and references in this letter are to the time stamp on that DVD. The cited comments by Staff were made at the December 12 meeting and can be viewed at the time stamp 2:26 and 2:35:17. The Council should withhold approval of this Mitigated Negative Declaration until adequate information about the traffic impacts in Fourth Lane is produced by City staff. At a minimum, such information should include a discussion of how delivery traffic is proposed to be managed and traffic impacts minimized in Fourth Lane. The 321 Miller Owners are not aware of any requirement or proposed requirement that the future tenants of the office space in the proposed project make best efforts to minimize traffic impacts in Fourth Lane. At the very least, such requirements should limit the size of delivery trucks, and require tenants to coordinate the schedules of their deliveries so that two delivery trucks will not be on site at the same time. There should also be a 'no stopping' zone in Fourth Lane next to the Project site. This traffic impact to Fourth Lane remains hidden so long as only intersections are studied, and so long as no data regarding Fourth Lane traffic is provided for analysis. As the 321 Miller Owners pointed out on January 8, it is appropriate under CEQA to evaluate both intersection and road sections in making a CEQA traffic study. Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 755..6. The loading area is discussed only briefly at page 51 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which states that the project would have space for just one small delivery truck at a time so long as it is not being used for other purposes. The problem is that Staffhas not . determined exactly how this loading area is to be utilized. At the Council meeting on December 12,2007, planning Staff stated that the actual use for the loading area had not been determined, that it could be used for deliveries or for trash, and that the determination of the actual design for the loading area will be left to the potential future tenants of the Project office space as part of the tenant improvements. 1 (project proponent acknowledged that traffic impacts from truck deliveries should be addressed and that best efforts should be used to minimize impacts). See also: Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of the University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1139 (project proponent appropriately and adequately discussed the impacts of truck delivery traffic). Chaurick Smalley February 25, 2008 Page Four ':;Ht\:S~'16:;' .. ,;; ;'~, :'~L::~;/~ ~ _,_~:(-,:I ~;::1:i ,; t:;~,'- ::':I:-H:";:~:' , "",\ :\~~ Il;"" -",' ~ , ~" ~ 1,1.:I\~~ I -il,.;) ~ ~ II I_ . * ; " Chad rick Smalley February 25, 200& Page Five 4. Conclusion. For the reasons discussed above, the 321 Miller Owners urge the Council to withhold approval of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to fully consider the impacts caused by building a 60 foot wall just five feet away from the windows of an existing residential apartment building, and the traffic impacts of the project. Adequate mitigation is required for significant impacts, and if this is impossible an EIR should be considered pursuant to 14 Cal. Code Regs. S 15162. An EIR provides detailed information about the likely effect a proposed proj ect may have on the environment, lists ways in which significant effects might be IJIinimi7.ed and indicates alternatives to the project. Public Resources Codes 21061. An EIR is required whenever there is a "fair argumenf' that significant impacts may occur. Quail Botanical Gardens Foundation, Inc. v. City ofEncinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602. There is "a low threshold requirement for preparation of an EIRn (No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68,84) and a "preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review" (Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1316- 1317). An EIR must be prepared "whenever it can be fairly argued on the basis of substantial evidence that the project may have a significant environmental impact" (No Oil, Inc. supra at 75) even if there is substantial evidence to the contrary (Arvtv. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Valley Area Planning Comm. (2002) 101Cal.App.4th 1333, 1346. Very truly yours, HANNIG LAw FIRM LLP ,-(/J /~ Peter W. Daniel cc: Clients {ZAMM:2054:PWD:H006628S.DOC.l} 315 MAPLE AVENUE . P.O. BOX 711 . SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94083 Light and View Impacts As detailed in the MND, staff has carefully analyzed the view impacts, as well as the shade and shadow impacts of the proposed project on surrounding properties. Both impacts are analyzed as components of the project's broader aesthetic effects. The issues have not been "parsed"; rather, the reason that they appear under separate sub- headings in the MND is for clarity and organizational purposes, and is consistent with how courts have traditionally separated the two issues when evaluating a project's aesthetic impacts. (See, e.g., Banker's Hill v. City of San Diego (2006) 139 Cal.AppAth 249,279-280; Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.AppAth 572, 586.) The case law cited in your letter addresses CEQA "piecemealing" principles, which do not apply Thank you for your comments on the recirculated Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Miller Avenue Parking Structure. The Planning Division is in receipt of your office's comments and has prepared the following response to the substantive environmental concerns raised in your letter. As noted in your letter, your comments focus on two areas of concern: (1) light and view impacts, and (2) traffic impacts. Both issues are discussed below. Dear Mr. Daniel: Re: Response to Comments on Revised Miller Avenue Parking Structure Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts Peter W. Daniel Hannig Law Firm LLP 2991 EI Camino Real Redwood City, CA 94061-4003 March 7, 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION (650) sn-8535 FAX (650) 829-6639 PEDRO GONZALEZ, MAYOR KARYL MATSUMOTO, MAYOR PRO TEM MARK N. ADDIEGO, COUNCILMEMBER RICHARD A. GARBARINO, COUNCILMEMBER KEVIN MULLIN, COUNCILMEMBER BARRY M. NAGEL, CITY MANAGER CITY COUNCIL 2008 Miller Avenue Parking Structure - Response to Comments 3n12008 Page 2 here where the issues are evaluated as part of a single analysis in a single CEQA document. Your comments state that your clients' objection to the project is not that construction will eliminate any views of scenic vistas, but rather that it will eliminate their views altogether. Staff is mindful of the view impacts of the project, but we reiterate that CEQA does not protect private views of unremarkable urban landscape, regardless of the degree to which those views are affected. Your comments do not appear to raise any legal inadequacy with this conclusion. As such, the comments on view and shadow impacts may represent a difference of opinion, but do present any environmental concern that requires further analysis. Finally, with respect to view and shadow impacts, you have requested that a setback be required for the project. Staff has discussed with the project designer the possibility of redesigning the structure to provide an adequate setback, however, technical and economic concerns make such a setback infeasible. This is principally due to modifications to the ramping system in order to accommodate a parking structure within a smaller building envelope. Such modifications will at a minimum require more complicated forming and structural supports, resulting in a loss of parking spaces. Economic implications notwithstanding, a setback of substantial size could render the project technically infeasible. Further, as noted in the MND, the project and your clients' property are sited in the Downtown Commercial zoning district, where lot line-to-Iot line development is permitted without height restrictions, and use permits are required for structures that include residential uses. Additionally, the General Plan prohibits first floor residential uses in the Downtown Commercial land use designation. Therefore the apartment buildings configured for first-floor residential use located in the vicinity of the project are nonconforming uses. As the proposed project is consistent with the City's planning documents and zoning code, and a legally adequate environmental review has been prepared, staff's position is that such impacts on nonconforming uses should not constrain lawful development on adjacent parcels. Courts have recognized that a primary objective of zoning is the gradual elimination of nonconforming uses. (See, e.g., County of San Diego v. McClurken (1951) 37 Cal.2d 683, 687.) Allowing existing nonconforming uses to impede fulfillment of the City's planning and zoning determinations would be inconsistent with this objective. Therefore, staff does not recommend that any additional setbacks be imposed for this project. Traffic Impacts Pursuant to your office's comments on the original MND, the traffic analysis has undergone substantial revisions in this recirculated MND. These revisions have been helpful to confirm the original conclusion that the project will not have any significant impacts to traffic and circulation. The revised analysis incorporates data based on the current project design. Impacts to circulation are evaluated based on intersection data. As noted in the traffic expert's report, "[i]ntersections, rather than roadway segments ]065017.1 Cc: Joseph P. & Janice M. Caron P.O. Box 389 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Sincerely, Your concerns throughout this process have been evaluated by staff and contributed to the decision to revise and recirculate the MND. Your February 25, 2008, comments, while appreciated, do not present a fair argument based on substantial evidence that the project may have significant environmental effects for CEQA purposes. Accordingly, the MND is a legally adequate CEQA document. As no other substantial evidence of significant impacts exists on the record, it is appropriate for the City Council to approve the project based on the Revised MND. Conclusion With regards to the MND's analysis, Figure 3 demonstrates that there is adequate room for a loading truck to maneuver in Fourth Lane. Further, the project has been designed such that when a truck is parked at the loading station, it will not block circulation in Fourth Lane. (See MND, fig. 3.) Vehicles will still be able to travel the length of the Lane and tenants of 321 Miller Avenue will be able to access the Lane. Contrary to your assertion, the traffic impacts of the loading and delivery area have been adequately discussed in the MND. The document shows how trucks will access the project site, and where they will be parked while making deliveries. While a final determination regarding loading activities on Fourth Lane has not yet been made, the analysis of the impacts of such activity complies with CEQA's requirement that all reasonably foreseeable consequences of approval be analyzed. (See Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376.) Since staff has reviewed the reasonably foreseeable consequences of project approval, including potential loading activities on Fourth Lane, and determined that project approval will not result in significant environmental impacts, the lack of a final use determination for loading on Fourth Lane does not prohibit the City from approving the MND at this time. Miller Avenue Parking Structure - Response to Comments 3/7/2008 Page 3 between intersections, are almost always the capacity controlling locations for any circulation system." (MND, appen.D.) REVISED INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY q;F;;.~P~! . SANilfRANCISCO ;<:,' '~;-',- >>:C:'iiC MILLER A VENUE,>J?A. 'NGSTRUCTURE PREPARED BY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 315 MAPLE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 FEBRUARY 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page MITIGA TED NEGATIVE DECLARA TION .....................................................................................................5 ApPLICATION ................., ............. ................. .".. ...,................................,............................ ,................................ ,.......,........,............... 5 ApPLICANT .. ..............................., ................., .... .....................,......,...........................,....... .......,..,......,............... ,..............,....,............. 5 PROJECT OBJECTIVE ............... ..... ................, ..............,............................................................. .,....,................ .................................. 5 LOCATION .. ,........., ............,...... ,....., .,............. ,....................................................,......,......... ................................ ................................ 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .. .,... ,.. ...... ..,.......... ,.. ..................................,.................... ...............,.... ..................,......., .......... ,....,................ 5 POTENTIALL Y SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS REQUIRING MITIGATION .........................................................,...................,................6 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS.............................,........................................................6 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALL Y AFFECTED ........................................................................................,..................... 7 CHIEF PLANNER' S DETERMINATION ..........................,......................................., ................, ...., ........................ ......................,...... 7 PUBLIC REVIEW" .., ,.............' ...., .... ,. ,............... ......................................................,..........................,................................................. 8 LEAD AGENCy......"................. ......,., '............. ...... ........,........................................................................................................, ,.........,.. 9 DETERMINATION ....,....., ,.., ...,.. ...., ,.., .,.,...... .., ."...,.................,........,.......................,.,.......... ,.... ....................................................,....... 9 INITIAL STUDy.................................................................................................................................. .............. .10 G ENERAL INFORMATION ......,., ..." .,............,., .................................,. .... .............................................................. .... ........................,1 0 PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION .. .... ...,., '......., .,..,... ....................................... ......................... ............................ ,. ,., ... ....... ,...,....,..,..,...10 Location and Setting......,............ .................. ................ .............. ...................... ..... ................ ........ ....... ....... ....... ......... ......... ...... 10 Circulation Characteristics....... ................... ..... ............. ...... .............................. .............. ....... ...... ....................... "..... ............. 11 Zoning/General Plan........,..... ......... ...................... ..... ........... ...... ........ ........... .......................... ......... ..... ................, .................. 11 Site Owners hip.... ........................ ........ ................ ..... .................................... ....... .......... ............. ...... ..... .............. .......... ........ ...... 11 PROJECT CONTEXT AND DESCRIPTION ..,.................................,......................,............... .,...,..., .....,.....,.......... ..... .....,..................11 Required Discretionary Approvals ........................................................................................................................................11 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST. ....... ........ ... ........ ................. ......... ........ .......... ..... .......... ............... ....................13 A esth eti cs ...,",.,.,.".....,..,.."....,.,",.,....,.,',...".......,.........,......,............................,."......."..,........... ....,....,.,........,....".",...."......... ......,....,.",..... 13 Agriculture Resources...,,' .....,.....", ,.............., ......., ,. ,...,. ,..., .,. ...., ......,.". .............." ,......., ,........" ..... ,.. .............,....,........'..., ...,... ,..." ,...,..".... 18 Air Qual ity ...", '........ ........".",..." ........" ,......" ....., ,.......,....... '..,........, ,... .... .........." ........ ,............ ....... ....... ,.................., ......., ....... ,.., .....,.., ....", 19 B io logical Resources"".."....",....., ,............,..", ............,....,.. ,........ ........ ........,...........,.... ,...."'....,, .....",..., ............"....,..., .....",. ........ ............ 28 Cultural Resources",....."."..,.."..,.."., ,.., ....... .......".." .....,......,....,...,'..,..., ........... ,..,..... ,...........", ......., ......,.. ........ ,....,.., .....,.....".. .......... ....... 29 Geology and Soils "'....."..,.,,,.,.. .""." ...,..-., .... ..'.., ...,.,.., ,................... ,...... .......... ,....", ,.............. ."...., "........" ,....,.. ,...., ......."....."", ,.., "...,...".32 Hazards and Hazardous Materials, .........., ..... ...' ......, ,....,.., ........,.., ..... ............ ......,.. ........ ,.. ......" .....". '...." ....."", ......., .............. ......., .....,.36 Hydro logy and Water Quality.... ...,..,'.."".....,.. ..........................."..,..., ..... .....,.. ,......, ...............",..."".. ......, , ......"..,..."......, ,........ ,........,..,.38 Land Use and Planni ng"., .....,.......,., ,..".",...." ....... ............"",'.. ..........."" ............" ......",'......,.. ...."",..,...., ,.... ,....,...",....,. .......,.. ,......, .......,41 Mineral Resources""....,......",...,."", '... ........,....",,'.. .....,..,........ ....."".... ........."" ........ ...........",..., ......... ...... ,...., ,..."'..",,, .............. ,.......,....,43 REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE i MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE ii REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. AIR QUALITY OAT A SUMMARY FOR SAN FRANCISCO AND REDWOOD CITY, 2003 - 2005 .................................18 1. PROJECT LOCATION ............ ................................... '....................... ........, ......... ....... ............................................10 2. PROJECT SITE PLAN.. ... ... .............................. .........................................., ......... ....,.... ..........................................12 3. LOADrNG ANALySIS............,..... .................................................................,............... .........53 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES APPEND ICES............................................................................................................................................... ..... .59 REpORT AUTHOR ,....... ....,...... ....'.......................................................... ..............................., ........................................ ...., ......'...... ..58 REFE REN CES.................................................................................................................................... ................57 Noise:, ..,..,., ......", .... .,., ..."..,.." .........,..........,.. ,... ..... ,.. ........,.....,., ,.......... ,.. ,.... ........ ...., ,. '. ",'. ,.,..., ,.., ,. ,., ....", ............,.,....., ..,................. ,...'", ,.. ,.,44 Population and Housing .., ...,..............."., ,... ,.., ".....,......,...,.,.......,..., ,. ....., .... ........,. '.. ,.' ,...... ,... ....., .... ..., ........"" ,.........,......................, .....",47 Public Services.......,.,.." ....,,'.' ......,.. ,.....' .,. .,...,.., .,. ,. ..".........,.,............ ,....... ............'..., ,.... ,...........", ....."" ......,., ,. ,......., ,............... ,......"" ,....,47 Recreation ...,. ,., ..,. .,..".." ....' ,. ...,..,.'.' ,..,.,..", ,.., ,.......................,..." .,....... ......., ..... .... .,.... ,......... ,... ,."", ... ,.", ...., ,.,., ,......,. .,.,..................... ,., ,.....48 TransportationlTraffic".,.""" ..." ,.. '..." '. ,.. ,.,. ,..............", ,..., ..,..,., ,......., ......', .... .......... ,.................." ..... ,.,."".. ,., ,....", '.....",.' ".." ,., ..,., ,......... 49 Uti I ities and Service Systems" ,......, ,...., ..". ,.....,.......". ,., ....",........, ,..., ..,.., ,......, .............,..,.", .." ....., ...." ,.........,." ,.. ,...,.....'", .,.", ..........., ... 53 Mandatory Findings of Significance.....," "., .,...........,.,.............,.. '....... ........ ...."""..... ,...., ".. ,. ,.".. ,..", ..., ..., .., '....'" ,............ "...,......, ...,..,,55 This page was intentionally left blank. REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE iii MITIGA TED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ApPLICATION This Mitigated Negative Declaration is for the proposed Downtown South San Francisco Miller A venue Parking Structure. ApPLICANT The Project Applicant is the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. PROJECT OBJECTIVE The Project objective is to enhance the economic viability of and implement the General Plan policies for Downtown South San Francisco by: -economically providing convenient public parking in the Downtown Business District -nurturing the development of active street-level uses -promoting infill development, intensification and reuse of underutilized sites LOCATION The Project site is located at the southerly side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue, Downtown South San Francisco, on four parcels ofland measuring 175' x 140' total. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Miller Avenue Parking Structure is proposed to be a 4Y2 story public parking structure with up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor commercial space, to be located on the three existing surface parking lots on the south side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040, 050 and 060) and the existing residential property at 323 Miller Avenue (APN 012-312-070) in the Downtown Commercial (D-C) Zoning District. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 5 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 6 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. Air Quality Rather than focus on a quantification of Project related emissions, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has developed a menu of mitigation options to control construction activity dust emissions. The BAAQMD considers implementation of all applicable dust control measures (which vary according to Project magnitude) as reducing Project related particulate (PMIO) emissions to less than significant levels. The mitigation measures appropriate for the proposed Project are described in detail in the Air Quality chapter of this document. These measures would reduce the Project's air quality impacts to a less than significant level. The following is a summary of mitigation measures for potentially significant Project impacts. Refer to the Initial Study Checklist and/or document appendices for a more detailed discussion of these mitigation measures. These measures have been incorporated into a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Appendix A. MITIGATION MEASURES FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS 3. Noise - Substantial Temporary or Periodic Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Project Vicinity Above Levels Existing Without the Project. Construction of the project would result in temporary noise increases due to operation of heavy equipment. 2. Cultural Resources - Substantial Adverse Change in the Significance of a Historic Resource. Development of the parking structure as proposed would necessitate the removal of an existing residential duplex locally listed as a "potentially historic resource". Removal of this structure could constitute a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of the resource. 1. Air Quality - Violation of Air Quality Standards or Substantial Contribution to an Existing or Projected Violation. The proposed Project would require site grading and removal of an existing residential structure. The physical removal of the existing parking lot and structures is a construction activity with a high potential for creating air pollutants. In addition to the dust created during removal activities, substantial dust and construction exhaust emissions could be created during grading for the project. The following is a summary of potential Project impacts. Refer to the Initial Study Checklist and/or attached Appendices for a more detailed discussion of these impacts. POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS REQUIRING MITIGATION 2. Cultural Resources The project sponsor shall construct the Project in a manner that preserves the historical significance of the residential duplex at 323 Miller Avenue, by developing and implementing a Preservation Plan that shall be incorporated into the bid documents for the project where applicable. The plan shall analyze alternatives to standard demolition and disposal, and shall require either relocation of the structure intact or salvage of historically significant building materials. This measure would reduce the Project's impact to the significance of historic resources to a less than significant level. 3. Noise The restrictions on construction activities promulgated by the City of South San Francisco's Noise Ordinance shall be incorporated into bid documents for the project. These limitations on hours of operation and noise generation of individual pieces of equipment will ensure construction-related noise impacts remain at a less than significant level. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED Environmental factors, which may be affected by a project, as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are listed alphabetically below. Factors marked with a filled in block (.) were determined to be potentially affected by the Project, involving at least one impact that has been identified as a "Potentially Significant Impact", as indicated in the Initial Study Checklist and related discussion that follows. Factors which are unmarked (D) were determined to not be significantly affected by the Project, based on discussion also provided in the Checklist. o Aesthetics o Agriculture Resources . Air Quality o Biological Resources o Hazards and Hazardous Materials o Hydrology and Water Quality o Land Use and Planning o Mineral Resources o Population and Housing o Public Services o Recreation o Transportation and Circulation o Utilities and Service Systems . Cultural Resources o Mineral Resources o Geology and Soils . Noise CHIEF PLANNER'S DETERMINATION After due consideration, the Chief Planner of the City of South San Francisco has found that with the implementation of mitigation measures identified in this Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, the Project will not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, and the requirements of the REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 7 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 8 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Chadrick Smalley, Associate Planner City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Telephone: 650.877.8535 Fax: 650.829.6639 The Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration will be circulated for a 20-day public review period. Written comments may be submitted to the following address: PUBLIC REVIEW d. The Project does not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the proposed development will enhance and complement the existing traditional commercial core of the City and improve the appearance of the area, all adverse effects of the Project will be mitigated to an insignificant level. c. The Project does not involve impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, because the described Project will incorporate both Project-specific mitigation measures and cumulative mitigation measures to avoid significant impacts of the Project in the context of continued growth and development in the City of South San Francisco. b. The Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. a. The Project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, or threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. It does not reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. It does not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history because there is no identified area at the Project site which is habitat for rare or endangered species, or which represents unique examples of California history or prehistory. In addition, the Project is within the scope of use contemplated in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and the Project does not have any significant, unavoidable adverse impacts. Implementation of specified mitigation measures will avoid or reduce the effects of the Project on the environment and thereby avoid any significant impacts. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will be met by the preparation of this Mitigated Negative Declaration. This decision is supported by the following findings: Adoption ofthe Mitigated Negative Declaration does not constitute approval of the Project itself, which is a separate action to be taken by the South San Francisco City Council. LEAD AGENCY The Lead Agency for this Mitigated Negative Declaration is the City of South San Francisco. DETERMINATION On the basis of the evaluation in this Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study: I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARA TION will be prepared. I find that the proposed Project MA Y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required. ~~h Susy Ka m:ChiefPlanner ;;l 1 2bO~ Date REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 9 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Department of Economic and Community Development 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Miller Avenue Parking Structure Property Owner/Applicant: City of South San Francisco PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION LOCATION AND SETTING ( .{ .. Figure 1: Location Map REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION INITIAL STUDY As shown in Figure 1, the Project site is located in the central portion of South San Francisco, on the south side of Miller A venue between Maple and Linden Avenues. The Project site is located in the City's central business district, more commonly known as Downtown. The site is comprised of four separate assessor's parcels in the 300 Block of Miller Avenue totaling 24,500 square feet of land area. The bulk of the site (21,000 square feet) is currently in use as three adjacent public parking lots totaling 60 spaces, while the easterly 3,500 square feet of the site is occupied by a residential duplex totaling 922 square feet. The project site slopes slightly downward from west to east. The site's primary frontage is along Miller A venue and the MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 10 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 11 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Miller A venue Parking Structure is a public project and thus is an entirely discretionary action undertaken by the City of South San Francisco. REQUIRED DISCRETIONARY ApPROVALS A preliminary Project site plan is shown in Figure 2. The Project would involve removal of the existing residential duplex at the east end of the project site and construction of a 4Y2 story public parking structure with ground floor commercial space. PROJECT CONTEXT AND DESCRIPTION The three parcels currently in use for parking purposes are owned by the City of South San Francisco. The residential property at 323 Miller Avenue is owned by the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. SITE OWNERSHIP The Project site is currently zoned Downtown Commercial (D-C). The site's General Plan designation is likewise Downtown Commercial. ZONING/GENERAL PLAN Fourth Lane is a one-way alley allowing travel only in the East-West direction. The lane is surfaced with asphalt and located within 20 feet of right-of-way. The Project site is currently accessible from the north via Miller Avenue and from the south via Fourth Lane. Miller Avenue is a two lane, bi-directional asphalt street with parallel parking on both sides within 60 feet of right-of-way. The right-of-way also accommodates 5.5 foot wide sidewalks on both sides of Miller Avenue. CIRCULATION CHARACTERISTICS Adjacent uses include multifamily residential to the east and west, single and multifamily residential to the north across Miller Avenue, and various commercial uses to the south across Fourth Lane. A few of these commercial properties are mixed-use; residential over commercial configuration. site extends through to its secondary frontage along Fourth Lane, which is a paved alley that services properties along both Miller and Grand A venues. The site and its surroundings are substantially urbanized, with small pockets of vegetation in the form of landscaping including small to medium trees, shrubs and ground cover. (:!.) ~~, (~.Jj (~) i. ,., :D (0 CD ",D ~) ~} CD CD ~) \'3i> (Ii) ",.1 I,,!.,: Ie) ':" ..."- ~ ...., .,r _..' /' , (jJ~;.)~:jj~:";-----:JJ~~ . ,$. , '._~._,.~. !,u~"-f-- i ! i i i i ---4~ ! i ! i i i i ! i i i i i i __u u__ ..__.~__.. MILLER AVE. o o .lJ.rl'-S o o COMMERCW. IIW::C _IF) o L_.... .~"'.k LEVEL 1 PARKING PLAN $ SCALE: liS- = f..t1' 15 STAUB 22.000 SQ, FT. Figure 2: Preliminary Site Plan REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE . PAGE 12 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 13 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan: Existing Conditions and Planning Issues, 1997. Settini South San Francisco's aesthetic character is framed by San Bruno Mountain to the north, the ridge along Skyline Boulevard to the west, and the San Francisco Bay to the east. The City is Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation I. AESTHETICS - Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a [ ] [ ] [ X] scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The Checklist portion of the Initial Study begins below, with explanations of each answer. A "no impact" response indicates, for example, that no conflict with agricultural zoning would occur due to the Project, because no agricultural zoning exists near the Project site. A "less than significant" response indicates that while there may be potential for an environmental impact, there are standard procedures or regulations in place, or other features of the Project as proposed, which would limit the extent of this impact to a level of "less than significant." Responses that indicate that the impact of the Project would be "less than significant with mitigation" indicate that mitigation measures, identified in the subsequent discussion, will be required as a condition of Project approval in order to effectively reduce potential Project-related environmental effects to a level of "less than significant." INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST contained by hills on three sides. Hills are visible from all parts of the City, and Sign Hill and San Bruno Mountain (which is outside City limits) in the distance are visual landmarks. The Project site is located in the Downtown planning sub-area of South San Francisco, on the south side of Miller A venue between Maple and Linden Avenues. The property offers views of suburban single family residential development to the north with Sign Hill and San Bruno Mountain partially visible in the background. Distant views are limited to the east, west and south due to the topography and the project site's location in a developed area. The lane directly south of the project site functions as a service and loading area for the commercial uses along Grand A venue. It is not widely accessed by through-traffic, and views from the lane are blocked in many places by the structures facing both Grand Avenue and Miller A venue. Therefore, the lane serves minimal, if any aesthetic purposes. a) Scenic Vistas The Project site is not located within any formally designated scenic vista, nor would the Project obstruct views of a designated public vista including San Bruno Mountain and Sign Hill. Furthermore, to the extent that any private views are impacted by the project, CEQA does not protect such views, particularly when situated in an urban setting. (See, e.g., Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San Diego (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 249; Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 572, 588-590.) The case law is clear that "obstruction of a few private views in a project's immediate vicinity is not generally regarded as a significant environmental impact." (Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 572, 586.) "Under CEQA, the question is whether a project will affect the environment of persons in general, not whether a project will affect particular persons." (Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 477, 492-493.) Therefore, in evaluating the adequacy of an agency's aesthetics analysis, courts have distinguished impacts to public views from those to private views. (Compare Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th 572, with Quail Botanical Gardens Foundation, Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597 (concerning views from a public park).) While courts have suggested that obstruction of private views could constitute a significant environmental impact, the decisions have generally not found impacts to be significant where the obstruction is limited to such private views. Rather, taking into consideration the number of views affected and the surrounding landscape, courts have frequently found that the effects on a few private views are less than significant. For example, in Bowman v. City of Berkeley, the court upheld the city's "no impact" finding with respect to scenic vistas, despite the fact that the project would affect views from an adjacent apartment complex and nearby single-family residences. (Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 576, 584, 587.) Critical to the court's decision was that the impact would only affect a handful of nearby residential properties-not the public at large. (Id.; see also Banker's Hill v. City of San Diego (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 249, 279-280.) Like in Bowman, this project is sited adjacent to REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE . PAGE 14 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE . PAGE 15 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION c) Visual Character The proposed Project would be located on a site currently used primarily for surface parking with one small residential structure on the easterly portion of the site. The existing parking lot b) Scenic Resources The Project would have no impact on scenic resources within a state scenic highway since it is not located on a state scenic highway. Here, like in the Banker's Hill and Bowman cases, views towards the project site from the adjacent properties are not of any of the City's scenic vistas, but rather of an underutilized surface parking lot in a relatively flat urban neighborhood. In some cases, apartment windows are only a few feet from the exterior wall of the existing duplex on the project site, therefore, views from these windows are already quite limited. An existing solid wood fence along the property line between the project site and the easterly apartment building further obstructs views from all but the very top of the first-floor windows of those apartments. Furthermore, the project does not obstruct views of Sign Hill or San Bruno Mountain, or any other scenic vistas visible from certain areas within the City. There may possibly be limited views of San Bruno Mountain from the upper floor of the north sides of the apartment buildings, though these views would already be largely obstructed by existing structures and trees across Miller A venue. In any case, any views of the mountains from the north sides of these buildings would not be affected by the project, which will be situated alongside the apartment buildings. Therefore, construction of the project will have a less than significant impact on CEQA-protected views from the adjacent properties. Even where public views are affected, a project must still impact a "scenic vista" to constitute a significant impact. Accordingly, the case law has further distinguished between such scenic vistas, and, for example, views of "an unremarkable urban street." (See Banker's Hill, supra, 139 Cal.App.4th at 280; see also Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 589,592.) Courts have declined to extend CEQA protections to the latter. (Id.) In the Banker's Hill case, the court upheld the city's finding of no significant impact, even though public views from a city park would be affected. The court reasoned that because the views were of "an unremarkable urban street," they were not the type of "scenic vista" that CEQA served to protect. (Id.) Likewise, the court in Bowman noted that the project site was an underutilized vacant lot in a flat urban neighborhood-not the type of "scenic vista" that CEQA protects. (Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 584.) apartment complexes. On both sides of the project, no more than half of the units face the project site. Therefore, like in Bowman, only a few private views will be impacted by the parking structure. Indeed, "that a project affects only a few private views suggests that its impact is insignificant." (Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 586-587 (citing and explaining the Mira Mar decision) (emphasis added).) exposes the aesthetically challenged lane to the adjacent residential neighborhood. A dilapidated accessory building is located behind the existing duplex and is exposed to views from Miller A venue. The project would remove the dilapidated accessory building and place a parking structure on the site, blocking views of the service lane from Miller A venue, thereby improving the visual character of the area. The proposed structure's size is consistent with the type of development contemplated by the General Plan for the Downtown area. The Zoning Ordinance provides for lot line-to-lot line development, with no height limits. All properties adjacent to the project site are likewise planned for more intensive, mixed use with traditional design features. Additionally, the inclusion of street-level commercial space would increase activity and human presence at the site, further improving aesthetics and pedestrian scale. Courts have found that the increased activity that accompanies development of underutilized lots can enhance a project site's surroundings and preserve, if not improve, an area's visual character. (See Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.AppAth at 584.) Here, like in Bowman, the project will enhance an underutilized lot in the City's downtown district. Furthermore, courts have reasoned that private aesthetic concerns "are ordinarily the province of local design review, not CEQA." (Id. at 593.) Here, the Project has benefited from the input of the City's Design Review Board to ensure that the structure will not degrade the visual character of the area. (See id. at 593 (finding that compliance with city's design review procedures served to ensure project would not degrade visual character of the area).) The Bowman court found that such a review and determination are "sufficient to address the [CEQA] Guidelines." (Id.) The mere fact that a project underwent local design review can itself "be found to mitigate purely aesthetic impacts to insignificance, even if some people are dissatisfied with the outcome." (Id.) Given that the project is also consistent with the type of development contemplated for the downtown area in the City's General Plan, and complies with the applicable zoning ordinances, including an allowance for lot line-to-lot line development, there is no reason to believe that the project will substantially degrade the character of the site or its surroundings. Rather, by establishing an appropriate and active use of an underutilized lot in the City's urban center, the project can be expected to enhance the site and its surroundings. Therefore, the Project would have no negative impact on visual character. Shadows and Shading Unlike direct aesthetic impacts such as scenic vistas and visual quality, the CEQA Guidelines do not provide criteria or a threshold for evaluation of shade and shadow impacts. Nonetheless, in an effort to fully disclose all impacts of the project, including insignificant impacts, staff has prepared, in consultation with the project designer, a shadow study detailing the shadow impacts of the structure (see Appendix B). The parking structure is likely to increase afternoon shadows on the second floor of the apartment building located east of the project site (321 Miller), and REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 16 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 17 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Furthermore, unlike the nearby apartment buildings, which are nonconforming uses, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies and regulations. As the apartment buildings are sited in an area zoned for lot line-to-lot line development, with no height restrictions, some shadow impacts of adjacent development are to be expected. For the reasons stated, the project's shadow impacts are less titan significant. d) Light or Glare Five "cobra" style light fixtures exist on the site and serve to illuminate the parking lot. In order to ensure night safety, the South San Francisco Police Department will require that the parking Shadow impacts of the Miller A venue Parking Structure are very similar to those found to be less than significant in Bowman. Like in Bowman, the impacts of the project's shadow will only affect the adjacent private properties. Also, like in Bowman, the project has benefited from the review of the City's Design Review Board, who are tasked with reviewing the "shadow patterns" of proposed projects. (See South San Francisco Municipal Code, S 20.85.030, subd. (b)(6).) Bowman confirms that where an urban development project's shadow impacts are limited to shading of only a few adjacent private properties during only part of the day, such impacts do not constitute a significant environmental impact under CEQA, and may be sufficiently addressed in a mitigated negative declaration. As this particular project involves urban development for which shadows are limited to either morning or afternoon shading of two adjacent private properties, the impacts of the project's shadows are less than significant. "[M]any if not most urban developments will have some shading effects on nearby properties." (Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 586.) However, the simple presence ofa shadow or shading effect does not necessarily constitute a significant impact under CEQA. (See id., Banker's Hill, supra, 139 Cal.App.4th at 279-280.) Courts that have evaluated an agency's shadow conclusions have implicitly applied the same principles that they apply to evaluations of view impacts. (See, e.g., Bowman, supra, 122 Cal.App.4th at 586.) In Bowman, for example, petitioners challenged the City of Berkeley's finding in a mitigated negative declaration that afternoon shading on a house and an apartment building's private courtyard did not constitute a significant environmental impact. (Id.) The appellate court agreed with the city. The court found that afternoon shadows cast on private property as the result of urban development, was not "substantial evidence to support a fair argument that the Project as mitigated will have any significant shadowing effect." (Id.) Even in Banker's Hill, where the proposed project shaded a public park, the court found the impact to be less than significant. (Banker's Hill, supra, 139 Cal.App.4th at 279.) morning shadows for the apartment building located west of the project site (337 Miller). At 321 Miller, the second-floor windows are already partially shaded by the existing duplex, however the amount of shading will increase with the construction of the taller parking structure. The analysis of project shadows indicates that the second-story units' current 2 hours and 50 minutes of afternoon sun in the winter and 6 hours and 10 minutes of afternoon sun in the summer would be reduced to 30 minutes of direct sun daily throughout the year. garage be well illuminated. Additionally, a slight increase in light emanating from the project site can be expected to result from the proposed commercial space and associated storefront glazing at the base of the parking garage. Lighting designs shall employ exterior fixtures that cast light in a downward direction, and exterior building materials shall not be sources of substantial glare. Accordingly, the amount of light and glare emanating from the Project site would be considered less than significant. It is not expected that additional daytime glare would be associated with the Project. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact II. AGRlCUL TURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ] [ [ X] [ ] ] [ X] [ ] ] [ X] a) Converting Prime Farmland The Project site is located in an urban area that has already been developed in a mix of residential and commercial uses. No Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmlands or Farmlands of Statewide Importance have been identified at the Project site. The project would not result in the conversion of any Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmlands or Farmlands of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses and no impact would result. REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 18 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 19 REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Setting Northwest winds are most common in South San Francisco, reflecting the orientation of wind gaps within the mountains of the San Francisco Peninsula. Winds are persistent and strong, providing excellent ventilation and carrying pollutants downwind. Winds are lightest on the average in fall and winter. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or [ ] [ X] contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net [ ] [ ] [ X] [ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] substantial number of people? c) Non-Agricultural Use Farmland Conversion The Project involves no activities that would result in conversion of farmland or other land in agricultural to non-agricultural uses, thus no impacts are expected. b) Conflict with Agricultural Zoning There are no areas in the vicinity of the Project site that have been zoned for agricultural uses and no parcels near the Project site are currently under Williamson Act contracts. The project would not result in the conversion of any land currently zoned for agricultural use or in Williamson Act contracts to non-agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated. The persistent winds in South San Francisco result in a relatively low potential for air pollution. Even so, in fall and winter there are periods of several days when winds are very light and local pollutants can build up. The local air quality agency is the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The BAAQMD enforces rules and regulations regarding air pollution sources and is the primary agency preparing the regional air quality plans mandated under state and federal law. The BAAQMD has prepared air quality impact guidelines for use in preparing environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) monitors air quality at several locations within the San Francisco Bay Air Basin, although none are located in South San Francisco. The monitoring sites closest to the Project site are located in San Francisco to the north and Redwood City to the south. Table 1 summarizes exceedances of the state and federal standards at these two sites. The table shows that most of the ambient air quality standards are met in the Project area with the exception the state standard for PMJO and ozone. Pollutant Standard Monitoring Days Standard Exceeded Site 2003 2004 2005 Ozone Federal I-Hour San Francisco 0 0 0 Redwood City 0 0 0 Ozone State I-Hour San Francisco 0 0 0 Redwood City I I 0 Ozone Federal 8-Hour1 San Francisco 0 0 0 Redwood City 0 0 0 PM 10 Federal 24-Hour San Francisco 0 0 0 Redwood City 0 0 0 PMJO State 24-Hour San Francisco I 1 0 Redwood City 0 I 2 Carbon StatelFederal San Francisco 0 0 0 Monoxide 8-Hour Redwood City 0 0 0 Nitrogen State I-Hour San Francisco 0 0 0 Dioxide Redwood City 0 0 0 TABLE I SUMMARY OF CRITERIA AIR POLLUTION MONITORING DATA Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2005, Note: S02 data is not available for Redwood City monitoring site Significance Thresholds. The CEQA environmental checklist provides five questions regarding air quality impact significance. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 20 MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 21 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, 1999. Nonetheless, it is apparent that one of the primary contributors to GHG impacts is vehicle emissions. For a parking structure, such as this one, vehicle emissions will certainly be the primary GHG contributor. However, here, several elements of the proposed project will serve to minimize the impacts on GHG emissions. The project is infill oriented in an established Greenhouse Gases. Currently, there is no standard methodology for evaluating how a project may impact greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or whether any such impact is significant. AB32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act, resulted in legislative findings that speak to the risks of global warming on California's environment. The Legislature has subsequently directed the Resource Agency to adopt guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions. Until such guidelines are developed and adopted, a quantitative determination of significance for purposes of CEQA is speculative. The BAAQMD significance thresholds for construction dust impacts are based on the appropriateness of construction dust controls. The BAAQMD guidelines provide feasible control measures for construction emission of PMIO. If the appropriate construction controls are to be implemented, then air pollutant emissions for construction activities would be considered less than significant. Any project with the potential to expose sensitive receptors or the general public to substantial levels of toxic air contaminants would be deemed to have a significant impact. The term "substantial levels" is further defined as an exposure associated with an excess cancer risk of 1 0 in one million. Any project with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors would be deemed to have a significant impact. A project that generates criteria air pollutant emissions in excess of the BAAQMD annual or daily thresholds would be considered to have a significant air quality impact. The current thresholds are 15 tons/year or 80 pounds/day for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) or PMIO. Any proposed project that would individually have a significant air quality impact would also be considered to have a significant cumulative air quality impact. A project contributing to carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations exceeding the State Ambient Air Quality Standard of 9 parts per million (ppm) averaged over 8 hours or 20 ppm for 1 hour would be considered to have a significant impact. the determinations of significance. BAAQMD CEQA Guidelinei provide the following definitions of a significant air quality impact: commercial district and is intended to enhance an existing urban area's viability. The structure is proposed to be above-ground and designed to minimize the use of mechanical ventilation equipment. Additionally, the Project is expected to reduce traffic through some of the surrounding intersections, since some drivers will be diverted directly to the parking structure rather than circling the local roadways in search of on-street parking. These design features, as well as the use of recycled materials typical for concrete construction and provision of bicycle racks to encourage low-emission transportation serve to reduce the project's impact on climate change. Furthermore, many of the project revisions and mitigation measures already required will also operate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For example, Mitigation Measure IB requires that a percentage of off-road construction equipment use CARB-certified engines or alternative fuels that will result in lower total emissions. The measure further restricts diesel engine idling and requires properly tuned and maintained equipment to minimize emissions. In short, the Project would not generate substantial GHG emissions, or substantially contribute to regional emissions. Additionally, Project requirements and mitigation measures would operate to further minimize any emissions that were to be produced by the Project. a) Conflict with Air Quality Plan Setting Bay Area Air Quality Plans are prepared by the BAAQMD in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Currently, the applicable plans include the state-mandated Bay Area 2000 Clean Air Plan and the Bay Area Ozone Strategy (Clean Air Plan update).3 These plans contain mobile source controls, stationary source controls and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the state and federal ozone standards within the Bay Area Air Basin. Impact A project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional air quality plan if it would be inconsistent with the growth assumptions, in terms of population, employment or regional growth in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The regional air quality plan utilizes the City's General Plan policies to determine these growth assumptions. The project site is designated by the 2000 General Plan for Downtown Commercial uses in an urban configuration, allowing a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 3.0 and no maximum residential density. The proposed project would develop a 4Y2 story, 256 space public parking facility and up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor commercial space on a 24,500 square foot site. The population, employment and VMT impacts of the proposed project are therefore substantially 3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Bay Area 2000 Clean Air Plan and Triennial Assessment, December 20, 2000. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 22 less than those considered in the preparation of the regional air quality plans and the project would have no impact on the implementation of any of the proposed control measures contained in these plans. b) Violation of Air Quality Standards Setting Project-related air quality impacts fall into two main categories: short-term impacts due to construction, and long-term impacts due to project operation. During project construction, the primary air quality effects would be in the form of increased local particulate concentrations due to fugitive dust sources. BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines4 provide thresholds of significance for air quality impacts. The BAAQMD significance thresholds for construction dust impacts are based on the appropriateness of construction dust controls. Over the long-term, project operation would result in an increase in emissions primarily due to an increase in motor vehicle trips to and from the project. Impact IMP ACT lA: Construction Dust. The proposed Project would require removal of a residential duplex as well as site grading to prepare the property for the parking structure's foundation. Both of these tasks represent construction activities with a high potential for creating air pollutants in the form of dust. IMP ACT IB: Exhaust Emissions. Additionally, construction activities would generate exhaust emissions from vehicles/equipment that could affect local air quality. The project could cause potentially significant impacts to air quality in the short term due to construction activities. Construction activities would temporarily affect local air quality, causing a temporary increase in particulate dust and other pollutants. Dust emission during periods of construction would increase particulate concentrations at neighboring properties. This impact is potentially significant, but normally mitigatible. The BAAQMD guidelines provide feasible control measures for construction emission of PMIO. With implementation of the construction controls identified in Mitigation Measure lA, below, air pollutant emissions for construction activities would be considered less- than-significant. o MITIGA TION MEASURE lA: Dust Suppression Procedures. The following measures are recommended for inclusion in construction contracts to control fugitive dust emiSSIOns. 4 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, 1999. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 23 During Demolition o Watering shall be used to control dust generation during demolition of structures and break-up of pavement. o Cover all trucks hauling demolition debris from the site. o Use dust-proof chutes to load debris into trucks whenever feasible. During Construction o Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. o Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind. o Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. o Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access road, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. o Sweep streets daily (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. o Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. o MITIGATION MEASURE IB: Exhaust Emissions Reduction Procedures. The following measures are recommended to reduce diesel particulate matter and NOx emissions from on-site construction equipment. o At least 50 percent of the heavy-duty, off-road equipment used for construction shall be powered by CARB-certified off-road engines or equivalent, or use alternative fuels (such as biodiesel or water emulsion fuel) that result in lower emissions. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 24 o Use add-on control devices such as diesel oxidation catalysts or particulate filters o Ensure that emissions from all diesel powered construction equipment used on the project site do not exceed 40% opacity for more than three minutes in anyone hour. (Opacity is an indicator of exhaust particulate emissions from diesel powered equipment.) Any equipment found to exceed 40% opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be prohibited from use on the site until repaired. o The contractor(s) shall install temporary electrical services whenever possible to avoid the necessity of independently powered equipment (e.g., generators). o Diesel equipment standing idle for more than two minutes shall be turned off. This includes trucks waiting to deliver or receive soils or other bulk materials. Rotating drum concrete trucks may keep their engines running continuously as long as they are on site. o Properly tune and maintain equipment for low emissions. With the implementation of these construction control measures, impacts related to construction dust and exhaust would be reduced to a less than significant level. Operation. Development projects in the Bay Area are most likely to violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation through vehicle trip generation. New vehicle trips add to carbon monoxide concentrations near streets that provide access to the site. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District's BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines recommends estimation of carbon monoxide concentrations for projects where Project traffic would impact intersections or roadway links operating at Level of Service D, E, or F or would cause Level of Service to decline to D, E, or F; or where Project traffic would increase traffic volumes on nearby roadways by 10% or more (if the increase is at least 100 vehicles per hour). Nearly all of the intersections near the project site are currently all operating at acceptable Levels of Service (B or C), and the project is not expected to cause Level of Service at these intersections to decline5. The project is expected to result in a decrease of traffic volumes through some intersections since it is expected that some drivers will be diverted directly to the new garage rather than circling the nearby streets in search of on-street parking. The signalized intersection at Grand A venue and Airport Boulevard is currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service of D, with a 35.3 second delay. The project, however, will not have any impact of this intersection; it will continue to operate at a Level of Service D with a 35.3 second delay after construction of the parking structure. 5 Crane Transportation Group, Traffic Impact Study: Proposed South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage, January 30, 2008 REVISED INITIAL. STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 25 Considering that the proposed Project is in an attainment area for carbon monoxide (i.e. the state and federal ambient standards are met) and that South San Francisco has relatively low background levels of carbon monoxide compared to other parts of the Bay Area, the proposed Project is not expected to have a significant impact on local carbon monoxide concentrations. Given that the Project's intended use is as a parking structure with other commercial uses, the Project is not expected to have any impact on other air pollutants. Therefore, Project operation impacts on air quality would be less than significant. c) Cumulative Air Quality Effects The Project would generate new emissions through new regional vehicle trips. The BAAQMD has developed criteria to determine if a development Project could result in potentially significant regional emissions. The District has recommended that 2,000 daily vehicle trips be used as a threshold for quantifying Project regional impacts. The Project's new trip generation is conservatively estimated at 344 new trips to and from the project site during the midday peak hour (172 inboundll72 outbound) and 244 trips during the evening commute peak hour (122 inbound/122 outbound). Net new daily trip generation is therefore well below this threshold for quantification. It follows that Project emissions would likewise be below the BAAQMD thresholds of significance for regional pollutants. Therefore, Project impacts on regional air quality would be less than significant. d) Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollution Concentrations Setting The BAAQMD defines exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants and risk of accidental releases of acutely hazardous materials (ARMs) as potential adverse environmental impacts. Examples of sensitive receptors include schools, hospitals, residential areas with children, and convalescent facilities. The closest sensitive receptors are the surrounding single-family and multi-family residential uses to the north, east and west of the Project site. A small City-owned playground is located 750' west of the Project, and a private school with associated playground is approximately 800' west of the Project site. Impact The proposed Project could expose surrounding facilities to on-site emISSIOns during construction; however, the Project's location greatly reduces the potential for exposure to pollutants released from the site since easterly winds that could carry emissions from the site to the existing playgrounds occur only 3% of the time on an annual basis. Additionally, the mitigation measures described above in section B (Violation of air quality standards) will ensure that construction-related impacts to air quality are minimized. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 26 After construction, Project occupants (i.e., potential tenants for the commercial space) who would potentially release toxic air contaminant emissions would be subject to rules, regulations and procedures of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. As part of its program to control toxic air contaminant emissions, the District has established procedures for estimating the risk associated with exposure. The methods used are conservative, meaning that the real risks from the source may be lower than the calculations, but it is unlikely they will be higher. In the first step of a two-step process, the District estimates how much of a contaminant would be found in the air at a specific location. The estimate depends upon the type of source, its rate of production and its location. The second step involves determining if the estimated amount of contaminant is hazardous to those exposed to it. This determination includes an evaluation of both carcinogenicity (tendency to cause cancer) and non-cancer health effects. Chemical toxicity is based on animal study results and in some instances, on the results of human exposure. After a new Project's risk level is determined, a decision must be made as to the significance of this risk level. If a new source has a cancer risk of one in a million or less over a 70-year-lifetime exposure period, and will not result in non-cancer health effects, it is considered to be a less than significant risk and no further review of all health impacts is required. If a project has a risk greater than one in a million, it must be further evaluated in order to determine acceptability. Factors that affect acceptability include the presence of controls on the rate of emissions, the location of the site in relation to residential areas and schools, and contaminant reductions in other media such as water. In general, projects with risks greater than one in a million, but less than lOin a million, are approved if other determining factors are acceptable. In general, projects with risks greater than 10 in a million are not approved. Non-approved projects may be re-evaluated if emissions are reduced, thereby reducing their risks. District Regulation 2-1-412 provides for special noticing requirements prior to approval of toxic air contaminant sources within one-quarter mile of a sensitive receptor. The above regulations and procedures, already established and enforced as part of the air quality permit review process for any future occupant of the Project, would ensure that any potential impacts due to hazardous or toxic air contaminant emission would be reduced to a level of less than significant at the closest sensitive receptor and other receptors closer to the Project site. e) Odors The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance do not allow any of the types of operations identified by the BAAQMD as potential odor sources in the Downtown area. The Project would not generate any such odors and therefore would have no impact. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 27 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ] [ [ ] [ X] directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ] [ ] [ ] [ X] riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department ofFish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ] [ ] [ X] federally protected wetlands as defmed by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement ] [ [ X] of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or [ ] ] [ X] ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted [ ] ] [ X] Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a-d) Effect on special status species/sensitive natural community/wetlands/natural corridors The Project site is located in an urbanized area, on a site that has repeatedly been developed and utilized for automobile parking since 19506. No candidate, sensitive, or special status species are 6 CSS Environmental Services, Inc., Environmental Site Assessment, 323 Miller Avenue, January 12,2007 REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 28 known to exist at the site. The Project would have no impact on any endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to any federally protected wetlands or wildlife corridors. e-t) Conflict with local, regional or state conservation plans The City of South San Francisco's Tree Preservation Ordinance only applies to trees with circumferences of 48" or larger or trees specifically designated as "protected" by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department 7. The Project site is surrounded by various types of landscaping, including low ground covers, assorted shrub types and small to medium sized trees. The largest tree on the project site measures 40" in circumference. As proposed, the Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, including the tree preservation ordinance. The project site is not subject to a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. Therefore, no impact would occur. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation V. CUL TURAL RESOURCES - Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ] [ X] [ ] ] significance of a historical resource as defined in S 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the [ [ [ X] [ ] significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to S 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique [ ] ] [ X] paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including ] ] [ [ X] those interred outside of fonnal cemeteries? a) Historical Resources Setting The Project site is comprised of four City-owned parcels on the south side of Miller Avenue. Three of the parcels are existing surface parking lots with modem light standards and chain link fencing and no other structures. The fourth, easternmost parcel is developed with a small single story wood frame residence which contains two dwelling units. A rustic corrugated steel accessory building is also sited on southern portion of the lot. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 29 The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in S 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Guidelines state that "historical resources" include 1) listed and eligible resources as determined by the State Historical Resources Commission, 2) resources included in a local register or identified as significant in a historical resource survey that meets the requirements of Sec. 5024.1 (g) of the Public Resources Code, or 3) any resources determined by the lead agency to be historically significant in light of substantial supporting evidence. Impact IMP ACT 2: Removal of a "Potentially Historic Resource". Development of the parking garage as proposed will necessitate the removal of the existing residential structure at 323 Miller A venue. This structure was built in 1890 (estimated) and was identified as locally "potentially significant" in a survey of historic properties in April 19868. The structure is not a State listed resource and is not locally listed as a "designated historic resource", however, the 1986 survey is included in the State Historic Resources Inventor/. According to the survey, the structure is locally significant but not eligible for National Register listing. Locally significant elements cited in the survey include architectural style and well-preserved historic building materials. Section 21084.1 of the Public Resources Code establishes a presumption of historical significance for locally significant resources unless proven otherwise by a preponderance of evidence. In light of these facts, the structure at 323 Miller Avenue is a "historical resource" as defined by the CEQA Guidelines. Since the Project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of the resource through demolition of architectural features and historical building materials, the Project would have a potentially significant impact. MITIGATION MEASURE 2: Preservation Plan for 323 Miller. Impacts to the structure at 323 Miller A venue can be mitigated to a less than significant level, however, the best option for mitigating the impacts cannot be identified until further analysis can be completed. Specifically, economic concerns, as well as concerns regarding land use compatibility, preservation of dwelling units in the Downtown area, and availability of sites for relocation must be evaluated before adequate mitigation can 7 South San Francisco Municipal Code Sec. 13.30.020 8 Bamburg, Bonnie L., South San Francisco Historic Preservation Survey, 1985-1986 9 Jordan, Leigh, Coordinator Northwest Information Center, personal communication, August 14,2007 REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 30 be implemented. Where it is known that mitigation is feasible but where practical considerations prohibit devising such measures early in the planning process, it is permissible to commit to devising measures that will satisfy specific performance criteria articulated at the time of project approval. (Sacramento Old City Assn. v. City Council (1991) 229 Cal.AppJd lOll, 1028-29; Defend the Bay v. City of Irvine (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1261, 1275-1276.) Therefore, significant adverse impacts to historical resources shall be avoided through development and implementation of a Preservation Plan by the project sponsor, which shall incorporate one ofthe following alternatives to demolition of the structure: (a) Relocation: Under this option, impacts to the structure would be mitigated to a less than significant level by relocating the structure intact to another site in the Downtown area that is owned by the City or Redevelopment Agency, or is privately owned. The City's Historical Preservation Commission has expressed support for further evaluation of this option. (b) Salvage & Reuse of Historical Materials: Under this option, impacts to the structure would be mitigated to a less than significant level by preserving the well-maintained historical material for use in future construction. The City's Historical Preservation Commission has expressed support for further evaluation of this option. Implementation of the Preservation Plan, including one of the alternatives identified above, will preserve the historical character of the structure at 323 Miller Avenue and reduce the project's impacts to historical structures to a less than significant level. b) Archaeological Resources Setting The Project site is a previously disturbed, developed site where no known archaeological sites are located. Impact While it may be possible that buried prehistoric resources could be located at the site, currently there is insufficient data to predict that they could be found at the project site, particularly because the site has been previously disturbed. If archaeological resources are discovered on site, these resources shall be handled according to CEQA Section 15064.5( c), which calls on lead agencies to refer to the Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code, or Section 21084.1 if the archaeological site is determined to be a historical resource. This is a standard practice for any City project therefore the impact is considered less than significant. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 31 c) Paleontological ResourceslUnique Geologic Features No unique paleontological or geologic features have been nor are expected to be identified at the Project site. Therefore, the Project would be expected to have no impact on paleontological resources and unique geologic features. d) Disturbance of Human Remains No human remains have been identified at the Project site. However, if such remains are encountered during site preparation associated with the construction at the Project site, all work shall be halted in the vicinity, and the San Mateo County Coroner shall be informed to determine if an investigation of the cause of death is required, and to determine if the remains are of Native American origin. If such remains are of Native American origin, the nearest tribal relatives as determined by the state Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted to obtain recommendations for treating or removal of such remains, including grave goods, with appropriate dignity, as required under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. This would reduce the potential impact associated with the discovery of human remains at the Project site to a level of less than significant. It is expected that there would be no impact from the Project related to the disturbance of human remains. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the Project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, [ ] ] [ ] [ X] as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] of topsoil? REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 32 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is [ [ ] ] [ X] unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in [ ] [ [ ] [ X] Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately [ [ ] [ ] [ X] supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Setting The relative stability and composition of different types of soils can contribute to hazard risks by amplifying earthquake waves, increasing susceptibility to liquefaction and landslides, and affecting flood levels. South San Francisco occupies three general topographic zones: the lowland zone, the upland zone and the hillside zone.1O The Project site is located within the Upland Zone, approximately 50 feet above sea level. The Upland Zone is comprised of gently to moderately sloping areas located throughout the central, south central and eastern portions of the City, generally between 30 and 200 feet above mean sea level, and between Sign Hill and the southern flank of San Bruno Mountain. Slopes are commonly between 3 and 15 percent gradient. This zone includes the alluvial plain of Colma Creek, which bisects the area from northwest to southeast. The City's Upland Zone consists primarily of the Colma and Merced soil formations. The project site is located on the Colma Formation (designated Qc on geologic maps), which extends on either side of the Colma Creek alluvial fan. It is comprised of loose, friable, well-sorted sand with subordinate gravel, silt and clay deposited during the Pleistocene Era. It generally provides good foundation conditions and earthquake stability when not disturbed by artificial cuts, which tend to erode and cause gullying. The project site is occupied by an existing single-story residential duplex and public asphalt paved parking lots. The project site is characterized by a gentle downward slope of roughly 9 Y2 feet from west to east. 10 Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan: Existing Conditions and Planning Issues, 1997. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE . PAGE 33 The Project would include site grading to accommodate a multi-story parking structure with ground floor commercial space. A soils report was prepared for the project (see Appendix C) and is relied upon for much of the following analysisll. Note that the report describes the project as "3-and-half story parking structure" which is to say 3'l2 stories over, or in addition to, grade. In this analysis, the project is referred to as a 4 lf2 story structure, since grade-level is counted as the first story. This is purely a difference in nomenclature, and has no impact on the report findings or the analysis and conclusions in this document. a)(i) Exposure of People or Structures to Known Earthquake Fault Setting The Project site is located in the San Francisco Bay Area, which is considered one of the most seismically active regions in the United States. Significant earthquakes have occurred in the San Francisco Bay Area and are believed to be associated with crustal movements along a system of subparallel fault zones that generally trend in a northwesterly direction. The site is located approximately 2.5 miles northeast, 7.9 miles northeast, and 12.7 miles southwest of the active San Andreas, San Gregorio and Hayward faults, respectively. In 1868 an earthquake with an estimated Moment magnitude of7.0 on the Richter scale occurred on the southern segment of the Hayward Fault between San Leandro and Fremont. Since 1800, four major earthquakes have been recorded on the San Andreas Fault with Moment magnitudes ranging from 6.25 to 7.9. In 2003, a study concluded that the probability of a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area by 2031 is 62 percent 12. Impact The Project site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone, as defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, and no known active or potentially active faults exist on the site. The closest Special Study Zone is the San Andreas Rift Zone located 2.5 miles southwest of the Project site. Therefore, no impact would result from surface faulting. a)(ii) Exposure of People or Structures to Strong Seismic Shaking In the event of a significant earthquake, the proposed parking structure could be exposed to adverse effects related to seismic ground shaking. Conformance to the Uniform Building Code would result in minimizing damage to the building and occupants. Because the applicable building codes contain measures that take into account the potential for ground acceleration during a seismic event, adherence to these codes would reduce the impact of seismic ground shaking to a less than significant level. II Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., Geotechnical Investigation: Miller Avenue Parking Structure, March, 2007 12 USGS Working Group on California earthquake Probabilities, Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031, Open file report 03-214, 2003 REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 34 a)(iii) Seismic-Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction Soil liquefaction is typically caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Research and historical data indicate that soil liquefaction occurs in saturated, loose granular soil (primarily fine to medium grained clean sand deposits) during or after strong seismic ground shaking. Liquefaction is typified by a near total loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to flow as a liquid. The potential hazards associated with soil liquefaction below or near a structure are loss of foundation support, lateral spreading, sand boils, landsliding and differential settlements. According to the soils report prepared for the project, the potential for seismically-induced ground failure is low and no specific mitigation is required. Thus, there would be no impact related to liquefaction at the Project site. a)(iv) Exposure of People or Structures to Landslides The Project site is located on land that is relatively flat, but that is sloped slightly from west to east. The risk of landsliding on the Project site is considered less than significant. b) Substantial Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil The project is located in an urbanized area where most soils are covered with either asphalt paving or concrete. The project will likewise result in a site that has minimal exposed topsoil, though temporary erosion may occur during construction. However, standard erosion control measures shall be employed to reduce this erosion to negligible levels during construction. Local jurisdictional rules require compliance with NPDES general construction activity requirements. Erosion control plans will be reviewed by the City and required measures will be followed during construction and no impact will result. c-e) Unstable Geological Conditions, Expansive Soils, Soil Suitability for Septics The project will be serviced by municipal sanitary sewer and does not include a septic system. According to the geotechnical investigation prepared for the project, the Project site soils have low expansion potential and moderate to high shear strength, and therefore no impact due to unstable or expansive soils or septic systems is expected. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 35 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MA TERIALS - Would the Project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or ] [ ] [ X ] [ ] the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ] [ ] [ ] [ X] the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle [ [ X] ] hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a [ [ ] ] [ X] list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a Project located within an airport land [ ] ] [ ] [ X] use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? f) For a Project within the vicinity of a [ ] ] [ ] [ X] private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically [ ] ] [ ] [ X] interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant [ [ ] [ X] risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Setting The property is presently used as a public parking lot. A single-story wood frame duplex is located on the easternmost portion of the site. As this structure was built in 1908, it is possible REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 36 that some quantity of asbestos and lead building materials may be encountered at the site during construction. a) Hazardous Materials Operations It is not expected that the project would utilize any significant quantity of hazardous materials. While businesses that utilize hazardous materials could potentially be established in the ground floor commercial space, however, such businesses would be subject to the Zoning Ordinance's requirement for a use permit and the Uniform Building Code's regulations applicable to the use, transport and disposal of hazardous materials. Location of such businesses is highly unlikely and separate environmental review would be required in order to adequately evaluate any such use, thus, normal operations of the project will not constitute a hazardous materials risk. Construction Because of the age of the building, asbestos and/or lead may be found in the building materials. The California Health and Safety Code requires local agencies not to issue demolition permits until an applicant has demonstrated compliance with notification requirements under applicable federal regulations regarding asbestos, lead-based paint and other potentially hazardous building materials. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District is vested by the California Legislature with authority to regulate airborne pollutants through both inspection and law enforcement, and is to be notified ten days in advance of any proposed demolition and must provide information on the amount and nature of any hazardous pollutants, nature of planned work and methods to be employed, and the name and location of the waste disposal site to be used. The purpose of BAAQMD regulations is the minimization of potential hazards to the public and surrounding land uses. The Project must also comply with California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) regulations, standards and procedures and California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Work Practice Standards. These regulations are designed to minimize worker and general public exposure to hazardous building materials. The above regulations and procedures, already established and enforced as part of the permit review process, would ensure that any potential impacts due to asbestos, lead or other hazardous materials would be reduced to a less than significant level. b) Upset and Accident Conditions Normal operations at the Project site are not expected to include hazardous materials. As discussed above, any operations that utilize such materials and wish to locate in the ground floor commercial space would be required to undergo separate environmental review as part of the Zoning Ordinance requirement for a use permit. Additionally, adherence to Uniform Building REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 37 Code regulations pertaining to hazardous materials would help prevent such an occurrence, and no impact would be anticipated. c) Hazardous Materials and Schools The Project site is located approximately 800' east of a private school. See section d) of this document's Air Quality chapter for a discussion of the Project's less than significant impacts to sensitive receptors. d) Cortese List of Hazardous Materials Sites The project site is not on any state-compiled list of hazardous material sites. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the property and found that no recognized environmental condition exists at the project siteI3. No impacts are anticipated. e-f) Safety Hazards Due to Nearby Airport or Airstrip The Project site is located approximately 1.5 miles from San Francisco International Airport. Development of the Project site as proposed would not create any inordinate aviation-related safety hazard above and beyond that which currently exists in the City of South San Francisco in the area around San Francisco International Airport. The proposal conforms to the South San Francisco General Plan airport-related height limits applicable to the area. Therefore the Project would represent no impact. g) Conflict with Emergency Response Plan or Emergency Evacuation Plan Development of the proposed Project would not interfere with and therefore have no impact on the implementation of any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan provided it conforms to the specifications found in applicable emergency response or evacuation plans. h) Exposure of People or Structures to Wildland Fires The Project would have no impact related to wildland fires smce the site IS located in an urbanized area and not close to wildlands. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the Project 13 CSS Enviommental Services, Inc., Environmental Site Assessment, 323 Miller Ave" January 12,2007 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 38 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions potentialIy Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation a) Violate any water quality standards or [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] waste discharge requirements? b) SubstantialIy deplete groundwater supplies [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] or interfere substantialIy with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) SubstantialIy alter the existing drainage [ ] ] ] [ X] pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which [ ] [ ] ] [ X] would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polIuted runoff? t) Otherwise substantially degrade water [ ] ] [ ] [ X] quality? g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood [ ] [ ] [ X] hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area [ ] ] [ [ X] structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant [ ] [ ] ] [ X] risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or [ ] ] [ X] mudflow? REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 39 Setting Colma Creek, the City's main natural drainage system, is a perennial stream with a watershed of about 16.3 square miles that trends in a roughly southeasterly direction through the center of the City. The Colma Creek watershed is one of the three largest in the County. The basin is bounded on the northeast by San Bruno Mountain and on the west by a ridge traced by Skyline Boulevard. Dominant topographic features of the drainage basin include two relatively straight mountain ridges that diverge toward the southeast that are connected by a low ridge at the northern boundary of the area. The valley enclosed by the ridges widens toward the southeast where it drains into San Francisco Bay. a) Violation of Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements Provided that any future uses occupying the commercial space at the site adhere to existing waste discharge regulations, the Project would present no impact. b) Deplete or Interfere Substantially with Groundwater The proposed Project would be located in an urban area and would receive its water supply from existing local infrastructure, thereby not depleting the local groundwater supply. The proposed parking structure would be an impervious surface over land that has primarily been used as an impervious parking lot and therefore does not pose an impact to groundwater recharge. Since groundwater resources are not used in the Project area, no impact will result. c) Alter Existing Drainage Patterns/Erosion and Siltation Effects The proposed Project would be built in an urban area already served by municipal storm sewers. The majority of the site is currently paved for use of a parking lot; therefore there is little opportunity for erosion or siltation effects on the site. Accordingly, there would be no impact related to altered drainage patterns with respect to erosion or siltation at the Project site. d) Alter Existing Drainage Patterns/Flooding Effects It is not expected that the proposed Project would alter the existing drainage pattern of the site, nor would it substantially increase the amount of surface runoff, since the majority of the site is currently developed with impervious surfaces including parking lots, a residence, and associated walkways and driveways. Given the amount of impervious surfaces currently on the site, the Project would not result in a substantial physical change with respect to drainage patterns or flooding effects. Surface runoff impacts are therefore expected to be less than significant. e-f) Runoff Exceeding Drainage System CapacitylIncrease Polluted Runoff/Other degradation of Water Quality Because the project does not result in significant changes to storm water runoff, the existing storm water drainage system will function adequately. The project is required to comply with all REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 40 regulations of the Water Quality Department including storm water treatment prior to discharge to the municipal system. The project therefore represents an improvement in storm water quality generated at the site and no impact is associated with the proposed Project. g-h) Place Housing Within A tOO-Year Flood Hazard Area/Impede or Redirect Flood Flow/Expose People or Structures to Flooding Hazards The project would not pose an impact to flood flows because the site is not located in a designated 100-year flood hazard areal4. No impact would occur from the project since no housing is proposed. j) Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami or Mudflow The proposed parking structure would be constructed on an inland site not subject to seiche, tsunami or mudflows and therefore would have no impact. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the Project: a) Physically divide an established [ ] [ [ X] community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, [ ] [ [ [X] policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ] [ [ [ X] conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Setting15 South San Francisco has a distinctive land use pattern that reflects the decision to initially locate industrial areas east of supporting homes and businesses in order to take advantage of topography and winds on Point San Bruno. Another development trend that shaped the arrangement of uses was the extensive residential development that occurred during the 1940s and 1950s, creating large areas almost entirely developed with single-family housing. As a result, South San Francisco is largely comprised of single-use areas, with industry in the eastern and 14 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map: South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA Panel 2 of 12, September 2, 1981 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 41 southeastern portions of the City, single family homes to the north and west, commercial uses along a few transportation corridors, and multiple family housing clustered in those same corridors and on hillsides. The General Plan, adopted in 1999, is intended to maximize the potential of undeveloped or underused properties in the City's traditional commercial areas. Upgrading of existing uses and provisions for quality design are important components of the Plan. a) Dividing an Established Community The proposed Project site is only 175' by 140', currently used primarily as a surface parking lot and would therefore have no impact related to the physical division of an established community. b) Conflict with Land Use Plan The Project site is currently zoned Downtown Commercial (D-C) and is part of the Downtown Planning Sub-Area as defined by the City of South San Francisco General Plan. The site's General Plan designation is Downtown Commercial. This designation accommodates a wide range of commercial and residential uses while requiring active, visitor-oriented commercial uses on the ground flOOr.16 The proposed Project is consistent with the following General Plan policies: 3.1-G-l: "Promote Downtown's vitality and economic well-being, and its presence as the city's center. " The proposed parking structure will promote Downtown's economic well-being by ensuring adequate parking supply for current and future commercial establishments Downtown. The project's scale also affirms the Do~ntown's status as the city's center. 3.1-G-2: "Encourage development of Downtown as a pedestrian-friendly mixed-use activity center with retail and visitor-oriented uses ... " The proposed parking structure is a mixed use project combining public parking and commercial space. The inclusion of commercial space on the ground floor will enhance the pedestrian expenence. 3.1-G-3: "Promote infill development, intensification and reuse of currently underutilized sites. " 15 City of South San Francisco, South San Francisco General Plan, 1999. 16 Ibid., p.73. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 42 The project represents intensification of an infill site via conversion of surface parking lots into a multi-story, mixed use parking facility. Additionally, the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance both contain policies that seek to reinforce the traditional development pattern of Downtown. The project complies in all respects with the development standards applicable to the property, including setbacks and height limitations of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, the proposed Project does not conflict with the above City of South San Francisco General Plan land use policies, thereby constituting no impact. c) Conflict with Conservation Plan The project site is not subject to any habitat conservation plan or natural community plan. The site is located in an urbanized area and no impact would result from development of the project. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known [ [ ] [ X] mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a ] [ ] ] [ X] ]ocally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Setting No mineral resources of value to the region, residents of the state or of local significance have been identified in the City.17 a-b) Loss of known mineral resource of value to region and state/loss oflocally-important mineral resources. The Project site has not been delineated as a locally important mineral recovery site on the City of South San Francisco General Plan, on any specific plan, or on any other land use plan. The proposed parking structure at the site would not affect the availability of and would have no impact on any known mineral resource, or result in the loss of availability of any locally important resource recovery site. 17 Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan Update Draft Environmental Impact Report, June, 1999 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE . PAGE 43 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation XI. NOISE - Would the Project: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of ] ] [ X] noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ] [ ] ] [ X] excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic ] [ X] ] ] increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? e) For a Project located within an airport land [ ] [ ] ] [ X] use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a Project within the vicinity of a [ ] ] ] [ X] private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? Setting In South San Francisco, the Noise Element of the City's General Plan (1999) contains land use criteria for noise-impacted areas. These criteria define the desirable maximum noise exposure of various land uses in addition to certain conditionally acceptable levels contingent upon the implementation of noise reduction measures. These criteria indicate that noise levels of less than 70 dBA (CNEL)18 are acceptable noise levels for commercial uses. 18 The decibel (dB) is a logarithmic unit used to quantify sound intensity. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire spectrum, human response is factored into sound descriptions in a process called "A-weighting" written as "dBA". CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level. Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, state law requires that for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 44 The South SarI FrarIcisco Noise Ordinance (Chapter 8.32, Noise Regulations, Section 8.32.030) specifies the maximum permissible sound levels for residential, commercial arId industrial larId uses. The Project site is zoned "Downtown Commercial D-C," arId the noise level standard for this zone is 55 to 60 dBA.19 Shorter periods of noise levels higher tharI these limits are allowed, but only for specified periods of time. Specifically, the starIdard + 5 dB for more tharI 15 minutes, the starIdard + 10 dB for more tharI 5 minutes, arId the starIdard + 15 dB for more than one minute in arIY hour are used. The starIdard + 20 dB cannot be exceeded for arIY period of time. However, where the existing ambient noise level already exceeds the above noise limits, the ambient noise level becomes the starIdard. The South San FrarIcisco Noise OrdinarIce (Chapter 8.32, Section 8.32.050) restricts construction activities to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on weekdays, 9:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Saturdays, arId 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays arId holidays. This ordinarIce also limits noise generation of arIY individual piece of equipment to 90 dBA at 25 feet or at the property line. a) Exposure of Persons to or Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Standards Development of the parking structure at the Project site could marginally increase traffic noise levels along the local streets due to arI increase in vehicles parking at the site. Ambient noise levels could see arI incremental increase due to increased activity in the proposed ground floor commercial space. Since the project site is located in arI mixed-use commercial district with urbarI features, arId is located within the 60 dba CNEL noise contour20, these contributors to ambient noise would represent a less than significant impact arId would not violate arIY standard in the General PlarI or Noise OrdinarIce. b) Exposure of Persons to or Generation of Excessive Groundborne Vibrations or Groundborne Noise Levels Groundbome noise is typically associated with railroad systems. It is not expected that a parking structure or associated commercial space would generate excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise. Therefore, it is expected that the Project would have no impact related to excessive groundbome vibration or excessive groundbome noise levels. c) Substantial Permanent Increase in Ambient Noise Levels As discussed above in subsection a, the project may result in an incremental increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project, but these increases are expected to be less than significant. 19 The noise limit that cannot be exceeded for more than 30 minutes in any hour (50 percent of any given hour). 20 Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan Existing Conditions and Planning Issues, p. 13-19, September 1997 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 45 d) Substantial Temporary or Periodic Increase in Ambient Noise Levels During site preparation and construction at the Project site, operation of construction equipment could result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project site. '] IMP ACT 3: Construction Related Noise. Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the operation of heavy equipment. While the Project will utilize a spread footing system such that no pile driving will be necessary, temporary construction noise would still be a potentially significant impact associated with Project development. Construction noise sources range from about 82 to 90 dBA at 25 feet for most types of construction equipment, and slightly higher levels of about 94 to 97 dBA at 25 feet for certain types of earthmoving and impact equipment. :J MITIGATION MEASURE 3: Compliance with Noise Ordinance. As discussed above, the South San Francisco Noise Ordinance restricts construction activities to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on weekdays, 9:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Saturdays, and 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays and holidays. This ordinance also limits noise generation of any individual piece of equipment to 90 dBA at 25 feet, and prohibits a noise level in excess of 90 dBA at the property line. City's Noise Ordinance standards shall be incorporated into the City's bid documents for the Project. Requiring compliance with environmental regulations and ordinances, including noise ordinances, is a common and sufficient form of mitigation where the lead agency has meaningful information reasonably justifying an expectation that the environmental impacts will be mitigated by such compliance. (See Leonoffv. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337, 1355; see also 1 Kostka & Zischke, Practice Under the Cal. Environmental Quality Act (Cont.Ed.Bar 2007) section 6.66, page 371.) Here, the City has been informed that the Project will use a spread footing system that will not require the use of pile-drivers or other impact equipment that may exceed the City's noise ordinance standards. Requiring compliance with the ordinance' standards as part of the City's bid documents will ensure that the standards are not exceeded, and therefore, maintain construction-related noise impacts at a less than significant level with mitigation. e-f) Location in Vicinity of a Public Airport or Private Airstrip The South San Francisco General Plan Noise Element contains existing and projected airport noise contours associated with San Francisco International Airport, located south of the City. These contours indicate the Project site is located well outside the 65-dBA CNEL existing and future airport noise contours. Based on the City's land use criteria, the proposed Project is not a noise- REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 46 sensitive use and would therefore be compatible with future noise level projections in the Project vicinity, representing no impact. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation XII. POPULA TION AND HOUSING - Would the Project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing [ ] [ [ ] [ X] housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, [ ] [ [ ] [ X] necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a-c) Induce population growth, displacement of housing, displacement of people The proposed parking structure would not directly induce population growth because no housing is proposed as part of the project. The project could indirectly induce population growth through the provision of additional parking spaces that could theoretically be used to fulfill the parking requirements of new housing projects, however, the areas potentially impacted are planned for additional housing under the General Plan and therefore impacts resulting from population growth have already been addressed at a programmatic level. Additionally, any future housing projects would be subject to project-specific environmental review. The project will not displace any housing units since the Redevelopment Agency is required by law to relocate the tenants of the existing duplex proposed for removal. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on population and housing in the area. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 47 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determ ination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation a) Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? [ ] [ ] [ X] ] ii) Police protection? [ ] [ ] [ X] [ ] iii) Schools? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] iv) Parks? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] v) Other public facilities? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] The Project is principally a public parking structure which will enhance the provision of parking facilities to Downtown businesses and residences. Schools and parks will not be impacted by the project, because the project does not include new residential dwellings. The project complies with local requirements for enhanced fire protection through the provision of a class III sprinkler and standpipe system (SSFMC 15.24.12). The project exceeds the requirements of the Minimum Security Standards (SSFMC 15.48.07) and includes video monitoring of all floors. In light of these project features, the proposed parking structure would place a less than significant increase in demand for other City of South San Francisco public services. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation XIV. RECREA TION - a) Would the Project increase the use of [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the Project include recreational [ ] [ ] ] [ X] facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 48 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact The Project is not expected to increase the use of existing parks or other recreational facilities, and the project does not include recreational facilities nor require the construction or expansion of new facilities. Therefore, no impact is expected. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significan Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact t with Impact Impact Impact Mitigation XV. TRANSPORT A nON/TRAFFIC - Would the Project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is [ ] ] [ X ] [ ] substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections )? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ] [ [ [ X] a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ] [ ] [ X] including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a [ ] [ [ ] [ X] design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e,g" farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X] programs supporting alternative transportation (e,g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Setting South San Francisco's Downtown is accessible to the region via U.S. 101, a multi-lane freeway that provides an exit to Grand Avenue, which discharges to Miller Avenue for southbound REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 49 travelers, Executive Drive for northbound traffic. This major freeway extends from downtown San Francisco and northern California to Los Angeles and southern California. Downtown is characterized by gridiron streets with typical blocks measuring 1,300 x 300 feet with 20 foot wide mid block alleys. In the Downtown area, Grand A venue serves as the principal thoroughfare, paralleled by Miller Avenue to the north and Baden A venue to the south. Major north-south streets include Airport Boulevard, Linden Avenue and Spruce Avenue. The posted speed limit throughout the Downtown street system is 25 miles per hour. The Project site is bounded on the north and south respectively by Miller A venue, an asphalt two lane bi-directional street with parallel parking and sidewalks along both sides, and Fourth Lane, a 20' wide asphalt service alley. Nearest cross streets are Maple Avenue and Linden Avenue, both asphalt two lane bi-directional streets with parallel parking and sidewalks on both sides. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared for the Project by Crane Transportation Group, dated February 7, 2007. The 2007 study examined circulation impacts in Downtown South San Francisco resulting from operation of a 287 space parking garage with 9,200 square feet of commercial space. The project proposal has since been revised to contain 256 spaces and up to 13,700 square feet of commercial space. Crane Transportation Group updated its study to evaluate the impacts of this revision. The revised study, January 30, 2008 is attached as Appendix D. a) Cause an Increase in Traffic, Which is Substantial in Relation to Existing Traffic Load and Capacity of the Street System The Project entails the construction of a parking structure with ground level commercial space. While the availability of parking and additional commercial space Downtown could induce more trips to the area, a decrease in existing traffic volumes through the intersections is expected since some drivers would be diverted directly to the new garage rather than circling the Downtown attempting to find on-street parking spaces21. Changes due to the Project are expected to be minimal for most intersections as demonstrated by the traffic study. New commercial space is expected to generate approximately 50 trips during each peak hour which would represent a less than significant impact to existing traffic volumes Downtown. b) Direct or Cumulative Increase in Traffic Which Causes a Congestion Management Agency Standard to be Exceeded No congestion management agency standards are applicable to the area and no impact is anticipated. 21 Crane Transportation Group, Traffic Impact Study: Proposed South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage, January 30, 2008. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 50 c) Change in Air Traffic Patterns The Project complies with all applicable height limits and would have no impact on air traffic patterns. d) Hazards Due to Design Features/Incompatible Uses According to the Traffic Impact Study, vehicular access from the proposed parking structure to the lane would present sight line problems for traffic from the lane to Maple Avenue. Therefore, the proposed project has been designed to eliminate parking patron access to the lane. The existing condition at Fourth Lane includes four separate access driveways to the Lane. Due to the configuration of the existing surface parking lots, each parking event accommodated by the 60 spaces in these three lots requires a trip to a segment of Fourth Lane. This is because the parking lots afford one-way travel only, with two parking lots exiting to the Lane and one entering from the Lane. Additionally, the existing duplex at 323 Miller includes parking spaces accessible only from Fourth Lane. The proposed parking structure would eliminate all of the existing access points, replacing them with a loading area with potential to allow small commercial trucks to service the proposed ground floor commercial space without blocking the lane while providing an area for trash enclosures and other utility functions. The project therefore improves lane circulation in terms of the number of vehicles entering and exiting the lane. In addition to providing its own loading space, the parking structure is proposed to be set back four feet from the rear property line, providing space for the lane to continue its intended function as loading access for Grand and Miller Avenue properties. As shown below, the project has been designed to accommodate truck loading and unloading in Fourth Lane. REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 51 (~ @J G! ~ ~ (". ~,i 1':RtM'P U:V[L NRl<JNC , OOAIN~c( ?I."~ Ii-, ......,., \l;i;I h.~ Figure 3: Loading Analysis Overhead utilities are proposed to be relocated underground. The project presents no adverse impact and may actually improve circulation conditions for Fourth Lane by eliminating access points and increasing the usable area of the lane. No design features were found to constitute a hazard to drivers or pedestrians and, therefore, no impact would occur. e) Emergency Access The proposed Project would involve construction in a manner consistent with City of South San Francisco building codes. There would be no impact related to inadequate emergency access to the site. f) Parking Capacity The project increases the parking capacity of the Downtown and therefore no adverse impact will result. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 52 g) Alternative Transportation The Downtown area is served by four bus routes operated by SamTrans and Caltrain commuter train service is located within 1/3 mile of the project site. The proposed parking structure will provide opportunities for future infill development in the Downtown, consistent with General Plan Policies supporting intensification of uses in the Downtown. Intensive development in the Downtown area is supportive of transit since Downtown is currently well-served by bus and fixed guideway services. No adverse impact is anticipated. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Detennination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS- Would the Project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements ] [ X] of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new [ ] ] [ X] [ ] water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new [ ] ] [ [ X] stonn water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to [ [ [ X] serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a detennination by the [ ] [ ] [ X] wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ] [ [ [ X] pennitted capacity to accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local [ [ ] [ X] statutes and regulations related to solid waste? REVISED INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 53 a) Regional Wastewater Treatment Standards Wastewater generated by the Project is expected to be minimal. The parking structure does not include public restrooms, and wastewater generated by potential users of the ground floor commercial space would be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Quality Control ordinance (SSFMC 14.08). Where as here, compliance with adopted ordinances and regulations can be reasonably expected to mitigate impacts, requiring compliance with such ordinances or regulations constitute sufficient mitigation. The Project would therefore have a less titan significant impact related to an exceedance of wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. b) Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities Setting Water. Potable water is provided for the City of South San Francisco and much of San Mateo County by the California Water Service Company (CWSC), which purchases most of its supply from the San Francisco Water Department (SFWD). CWSC's current contract entitles the City of South San Francisco to 42.3 million gallons per day (MGD) per year, and an additional 1.4 MGD is available as groundwater. CWSC bases future water use projections on the 5-year average growth in the number of user accounts, and water use projections for 2020 range from 5.9 to 9.1 MGD22. Under the current contract allocation, the CWSC has adequate supply to meet even the highest projected demand. As a result, there are currently no restrictions on service connections for new development. Wastewater. All wastewater produced within the City of South San Francisco is treated at the City's Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP), which is located at the end of Belle Air Road, near the edge of San Francisco Bay. The WQCP is jointly owned by the Cities of South San Francisco and San Bruno, and it treats all wastewater generated within the two cities. The WQCP also has contracts to treat most of the wastewater produced by the City of Colma and a portion of the wastewater produced by the City of Daly City. To accommodate continued development within the WQCP's service area, the plant was upgraded in 2001 to a dry weather capacity of 13 mgd. In 2006, the Plant handled approximately 9.93 MGD dry weather flow, representing 76 percent of its maximum capacity?3 Impact The Project will not require the construction of new or expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities since very little increase in wastewater will result from the development of the parking structure and current facilities have capacity to accommodate the increased flows. An upgrade of 450 feet of an existing water main from 4" to 8" diameter may be required to 22 Impact Sciences, Focused Draft Environmental Impact Report: 494 Forbes Blvd., February 2007 23 Ibid., p, 4,9-2 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 54 service the automatic fire sprinkler system proposed for the structure, however, this relatively minor upgrade to the existing water system would represent a less than significant impact. c) Storm Water Drainage Facilities As discussed above in Section VIII e-f, the proposed project generates little additional stormwater because a large percentage of the site is presently developed with impervious surfaces. Since stormwater attributable to the project is minimal, the project will not require the construction of new facilities and no impact related to the construction or expansion of storm water drainage facilities is expected. d-e) Water SupplylWastewater Treatment Facility Capacity The Project would utilize existing water entitlements and resources and will not place undue demand on existing wastewater treatment facility capacity, having no impact on these systems. f-g) Solid Waste Disposal Capacity Construction and operation of the proposed Project would generate solid waste that would be disposed of by South San Francisco Scavenger Company. Materials that cannot be recycled or composted at Scavenger's facility are transferred to the Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill, near Half Moon Bay. This landfill has capacity through June of 2027 under the terms of its current permit24. Operation of the Project would be expected to be in full compliance with all federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, thereby having no impact. Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact XVII. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples ofthe major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation [ [ [ ] [ X] 24 Ibid" p, 4,9-3 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 55 Environmental Factors and Focused Questions Potentially Less Than Less Than for Significant Significant Significant No Determination of Environmental Impact Impact with Impact Impact Mitigation b) Does the Project have impacts that are [ ] ] [ X] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects,) c) Does the Project have environmental [ X] ] [ ] effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Quality of the Environment Implementation of the Project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. There are no Project-related environmental impacts that would not be reduced to a level of less than significant through the implementation of the mitigation measures identified above. b) Cumulative Impacts The Project does not involve environmental impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. There are no Project- related cumulative impacts. c) Adverse Environmental Effects on Human Beings The Project would not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the Project is consistent and compatible with existing civic and commercial land uses in the surrounding area. The implementation of the mitigation measures identified above would reduce potentially significant Project-related environmental impacts to a level of less than significant. REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 56 REFERENCES Bamburg, Bonnie L., South San Francisco Historic Preservation Survey, 1985-1986 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines: Assessing the Air Quality Impacts of Projects and Plans, 1999. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Bay Area 2000 Clean Air Plan and Triennial Assessment, December 20, 2000 CSS Environmental Services, Inc., Environmental Site Assessment, 323 Miller Avenue, January 12,2007 Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., Geotechnical Investigation: Miller Avenue Parking Structure, March, 2007 Crane Transportation Group, Traffic Impact Study: Proposed South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage, February 7, 2007 Crane Transportation Group, Traffic Impact Study: Proposed South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage, January 30, 2008 Dyett & Bhatia, City of South San Francisco General Plan, adopted October 1999. Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan: Existing Conditions and Planning Issues, September 1997. Dyett & Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan Update Draft Environmental Impact Report, June, 1999 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map: South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA Panel 2 of 12, September 2, 1981 Impact Sciences, Focused Draft Environmental Impact Report: 494 Forbes Blvd, February 2007 Jordan, Leigh, Coordinator Northwest Information Center, personal communication, August 14, 2007 REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 57 USGS Working Group on California earthquake Probabilities, Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031, Open file report 03-214, 2003 REpORT AUTHOR Chadrick Smalley, Associate Planner REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 58 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D 1053262,1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Shadow Analysis Geotechnical Investigation Circulation and Parking Analysis REVISED INITIAL STUDY I MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ApPENDICES MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE' PAGE 59 Ct.r.J ::l s:: ell ell ....'" P> (1) ::l ::l ....0.. g; (1) (1) x o ("l s:: P> ell <: (](l ~ s:: _. ell 0 1il" ::l '-"P> (1) ::l X 0.. ~~ (1) P> 0..0.. N -. v.::l (](l ~~ ::r- C. , <: ~. ~ ::l" (1) ::l ~ :i" 0.. ell o ell -'rFJ q:;'~ g -.(1) ~ ~~ ~;a. ~ @ ::.:~ a 0.. P> P> .... -. ~q eI~ en'@ ("l ;> P> .... 3. ~ (1)q 6~ ::s ::;.' S::l" P> ~ ..e:~ p> (1) ("l .... (1) ell g ~ '" (1) s:: (1) O"'~ ~g o ("l '" rFJ o p> ~ ::l <: (1) ell (1) (1) 2" 0..", ~~o.. _.(j ~ o (1) =: ::l ~ '< ~'a ~ (1) p> (1) ~p..;> '" .... ~ ~ ",q s'~ (](l _. ~ Er (1) ~ ~ e; p> (1) ::l .... 0.. ell ell ~ ....(1) ~ (1) -.'" ::l (1) (](l ;;l p>'-" @ ~ p> ell ~ o ;>aQ ~ ~ <: o .... ~ ~ ~. ~- a_ (1) en g..~2" o @ ("l ~..c '" 0.. s:: ell , ::;';- ~ ~ =::l 2"~ ~~ ell . .... ell o g; a 0.. p> - 5' g; pro.. 5' g. ~~ cr.... p> 0- ell 0 .... ell ~ (1) o o g.~ ~~ .... (1) a ~ ~.... (1) ("l ~.~ en~ e-;a. p> 0 .... ("l ("l '" p>'" ::s ::; g-~ zg, o 0.. ~ g. ~ en' '< . g. 9. (1).:- ~, ~ ::l ::l 0..0.. . 0 .... '" (1) ~. :3 en tn. ("l ell ;-+ o' ::l ell ("l o s:: c: 0"' (1) ("l @ ~ (1) 0.. p> 0.. ::l s:: 0.. .... ("l 5' 0 (](l 5l ~ 2" p> ("l 0...... 5' O' (](l ::l 0' ~ @ .... ;- g .... s:: <: g-~a ~ 5' .... ~: p> .... 0.. (D' g: ..00 o' ;g ::l 0"'.... ~ 0 p> ::l .... .... ::l" [(1) 0..0.. s:: s:: ell ~ .... o tl l:: .... o ~. ~~ ~ i3l ~ ~ p> n -..... ;- o' ("l ::: .... :;:- (1) ("l o ::l ell 2" ("l .... o' ::l ~ (1) p> ell ~ cr p> ell .... ~ n' (1) 5' .... o 2" ("l ~ o 0.. el. ~ ~ C ::l"eIl (1) (1) ::l 0.. (1) s:: <: ell (1) .... .... , ;>11 p> 0 ell 0 _. ...., Zg. !'1' s:: .... (1) ell .... o 0- p> 0.. 0.. (1) 0"' .... fii' ("l .... (1) ~ (1) 0.. 0.. s:: .... 5' (](l '" o .... (1) ::l .... [ 0' .... ("l .... (1) ~ S' (](l p> ::;' '" 2- 2" g .... ~ g; ;J g; ;J 0.. (1) 0.. (1) ell '" .... '" q ::l" (1) .... s:: '< a 0 ("l ell 0 '" ~ n' <: ~ ~aa3. fii' @ g, '"0 p> a .... (") 0 g; ~, o <: ~ ~ ::l a >< .... g g, ~. ~ ~ ~ 5' g o' ~ (](l c: ::l p> (1) ("l X c. en' ::. 5' o.<t(](l ~. -g '" .... .... w ::l"",::t p> S' ~ ::l" (](l ("l aq' - ~ ::l" g. !'1' ~ @ _. ..c 0.. s:: g ::;. .... (1) [ ~. (D o tl l:: .... o ~' "'o..~~ ~ Ei p> ::! (1) 5' (D ~ :3 (JQ ::!. ~. g ~ Jg o' ;+ a ell ::: 2-;- -. - .... - _. 0"' g (1) g,!;; ~3. 2 .... ("l 0 2("l @ g ell q g; 2- 0..0.. O"'~ .... .... (1)(](l ~(1) I ::l s:: (1) '" .... o ~. ....,0 ::l ~. \.I ?D~ (1) .... ~ 2" ("l '" ell ::l" p> E- 5' (](l 0.. (1) a 8-: .... o' ::l 0.. (1) 0"' .... fii' ::;> o a Er (1) ("l 0..'" .... 0.. o s:: (1) ~ P3 5l 5' S 0"' ~ 2"(](l;:+' E. 5' ("l p> c: (](l g. ::l 5' ell ? o..(](l Q' (](l .... p> 0.. 5' (](l t:> ::: ~ 0:;' ..... ~. c .... ~ .... ~ <t> n ..... <t> ~ :s c a o' ~ 8;J~ ::l (1) ...., ell ....; 2"0'c;) ("l=~ ....o~ o' ~ -..; ::l 5' a ("l(](l ~ o a >- ~(1)~ p>P>~ ("l ;g V:i 1il"....c::: s~S; (") .... o (1) .... ::l .... ;:.,. q (1) 2..8tl 2' a 1:;; <13. a ;:: .... (1) ~J -'::l l:: ~ ~~ g-o..~ ~ 0' ~ en ""1 c' a s' ::: ~'2- ~ o'~. C ::l 0 n eIl::l ~ s' e; ~ '-" V:i;:'" ~ ~. ::: f}ta .... :::: ~!2.. c q" .... V:il 5-3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... -, ~~ ~<Q., ::: ~ ~ 5:. ..... ~ta 0' !:: ::: :::.. 0' q' rFJ'"O "'.... 3' o~, _ ::l (1) .... ~Q.=t;" .... <<- 3 I'D = .... I'D Q. 8gErg.5'- 5l (D~ g 2:~ ::to....ao..-ot"'! ~ =~. (1) I'D::;; ("l (1) _ 3... ~ n~ ftltD o' ..... ell = = ::l 0';- .... Q. o tTl'TlrFJ \.I :;:- = P3 g.::;" :: -. (](ls,::l .... '< 0 ell ("l::l"o_= 0' (1) fii' rFJ ...., ~ ~ ::l (1) ("l Pl ~ 0 5.0 ::l ~ (](l Q. ~~ o ::::!. P> = ....I'D I'D Q. - 3 't:l P> n .... a: -. - - ~ ""l > -< ~ = = ~ ""C ~ ""l ~ -. = (JCl rJ:J. ..... ""l = r.l ..... = ""l ~ I ~ -. ..... -. (JCl ~ ..... -. o = ~ o = -. ..... o ""l -. = (JCl ~ = Q.. ~ ~ "C o ""l ..... -. = (JCl ""C - ~ = I ~ ~ r.l ~ :3 0" ~ ""l N Q '"' N Q Q -....1 ~ .... a'Q' P> .... o' = s::: C ,9 0 0 t:i ... 8 {l'"O0 ~..g<l:: Ct::: i:: '" '" Il) i:: s::: 8 0 C) 8 'Vi .~ 0 .~ '" u 8 .~ ~ Il) '-t:l Il) x ....0 ~~Z <:l Il) '"0 -s::: .... i:: r~ ~ ~ ..... ~ .... " Il) Il) Cl:l 8 ~ ' ..... OJ)8i: ~ ,5 Il) E :::;~O:;o.. ~ ~ ;; '5 ~ cE ,~ g- ~~~= ~ [-< 0...9 O.;vt) ~ III ~ 2 t:""'ool }"",._ ~ "'<: ;:: '"0 '" r... ~ Il) = v III U 0 E::: \.l ::l U ~~'"OE < Q" ~'Vi ;>., .D '"0 c; ~ ...." .... '"0 Q) = Q) "'~Q)O:;rJi ~8.~~a '0 ~ '5 c;'~ Z;;:a g- ~ 's ::l ..c:: c;.~ Q) '"0 '" '" '"0 1u >-. = Q).9 ~ > .9 .5 .D 0 ~""OJ)",- Q) U = ~ = ..c:: g Q)..c::'- .s13-gg3 ,,-,o2~~ o us.!.'" .... ~cB'Ed)~ u'"O'"O~-B ~~~~~ 0.. ::l '-2 .~ ~ ~ e Q) Q) U E = t> 8 I E.9 ~ o..o:l- '" C1.) ._ cG ~:; :: 5-< ~ 8 <Q)U::lQ) o = o .~ '"0 'x o V '" Q) :0 '" ~ ..c:: u ::l '" '" '" .... Q) E .~ l2 Q) E '"O!2 - ::l g .~ = t:: o ~ u 0.. C .... o 0 .o~ -g ~ Q)"<<l '" 0:; :;:) u o o E t> ~oo .~ '"O::l::l ..... Q) .5 ~ ~ '"0 -g.~ 8 ~ '"0 E .... Q) Q):E) ~'g~'O-g8:E o '0' -B c; tis ~ 2 0"....=1;i~00" _0..", U o....Q) ~Q)..c::;;::~,"o.D Q)..d~v~c:_ :0 ';; ~.5 V ::l "@ =oo1a~cE~ ~'"O8 :0......---0 8 Q) .... .~ 5 0 Q) o gj <2 .0 8 8 N .!:l <l:: .... .o'u ..g .s- = il '" =.- '" ::l = Q) = Q) U 0..'" 0"''''.... o~iloaQ)..5=B 'Vi .:::- 0 ,-,.- ;>., Q) i:: .~ ::l";f? ..: ~ = OJ) ::l S g ~ ::l'S < .5 Q) Il) = ~ ..2 Q) ..-- ~ ,t:: .... 0 ' .... '" ~ ._ '"0 Q) Il) i: 0 Q) -Bt)~a.rgQ)'-'-B ~ g ~ ;>., 1:S 8.f' i:: ::l '" Q) =.-.S- u 0 13=...."'i::l~Q) u.1 8 g.5 0.. g- 15' gj o "-,,...:.. o ~ g .02 "1:'~ ~ ~ 8 5 Il) ~ OJ) Cll)ob e-B,u o '"0 '-' 0..'- ...... 5 ~ 5 .... ~ S o 0.. :9 ;.:; '" - 0"' .5:fl Q) :::CI'J"'O ~ ~ ~ ..c:: 0.. Q) '" .... ~ ..-- Q) 0 ~~o.. c; i:: ;>., t]'E !l~..g a ~ ~ u.~ 0.. Q) E:: ..g ~ ~ ,5 o o '" ~~..>oI =;::s;; "':::.D -B '" .... Q)..g~ c; ::l .... 8 U ~ ....5 0 ~.~ ~ ~.= '0 :9~~ 0.0 tt:i > ,5 o'~ '"O'"O1l) = Q) ... g S ... ~ z ~ = Q) Il) Q) .D .~ 8_00;;-: 0..- ~ ,_ '" '"0 5-~ 2 rJi Q) ~ OJ)"@ ] ~ ,5 '5 .~.S 'e; d o S ~ 8 o 0.. ~ ~ ..>oI-B ;>.,'" ~ '" S 0.0 ~] g ~ Il) ;>., tSr.;; b g = ::l 8 .5 8 1:: 2 8 '"0 OJ) 0.0 ,5 .~ ~ ~ ~ = ' 'bn'~ = '" Q) = ... 0 'Q) Q) -B ~ ~ ..9 ... <2 .... = Q) 8 0.. '5 0"' Q) .5 ~ .s ~ 8 '"0 1a Il) c Z rJi ~a ... .- Q) '" 0.. .~ 2 8 t:l.. Q) o .... '" ::l ~ o~ t: Q) ='"0 81av = .... > .9 ~ ~ t) '"0 ::: g a a en '';:: r':: =u:::::' 8 g.S Q) '" .., '" = ::: .s 8 ~ ,,-,0;':: 0.... .., ='"O~ oE...... '.p ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 C ~ ~ Q)23"'O 8 u Q) ~ il g 0..8'" 8,- ~ .~ tI'J" Q) -5~.D ~::l'" ..c::"'- .... ~ ::l ~E~ g(t(J Pl 3 g ~-g'" ~ ..., 2' .0 Pl ::: Q ~ -6' 0' 3 g :::l g tn' 0 :'" ('t) ~ '0 ..., .3. ~ o..n ::: .... ~ .... ~ o 0 ::: o s:: '0 ~ ..., ..., Pl ~ .... '" o' ::.. :::l .... g, S' 5' """" n ::r ..., (1) (1) Pl '" ~ '" ....., '-' t--t-- <Il <Il <:: <:: <Il <Il C:;-C:;-- ~~ ~. ~. o <Il ~ <'l I ~ S' 1:;' - ~ ~'~ Ii ~ <Il ~ ~"'tl ~ ~ - .... <Il 5"~, ~ ~ ~ 5' ~ - - ~ ~~ .... -, ,0 ::s (ii' ~ <'l :-- i~ :2':~ ~ ~ - t:l ~ ...".'~ c:r-C" ~ 1:;' 0 <Il Cll .... :::;. :=: 5' (J ...., > '"tl ::t '" ::r.... 0 ,-., i5.. 3 n -, ::r ~::: ciQ' -, ::r '0 cr" _. _. 0 ~ ~ :;j;:!.~':::l ;!1. ~ :to '-' < ......, ...; ::r 0 -. 0 0 IJ:l 0.: !=l. '0 0 @ c;J ~ ..., =n::!,~.:::l t:l ::: o' ~ -, q. ~ ~ ~i' g g ~ :'. :?' Eo 5l !=l. r/J (i' ~ < _:::l - -. 3 t:l ~ 0 .... ;::::: Eo'i::l....1 3 =n'O ~ o 0.. ::: O. ~ :::..., Pl g Pl :::l ....:::l<;,!=l.Dl....(t:::l~R<> :::;. ::r '" > _. ~ 0 ..., .... tIl ::r .... ~ 0 ., cr" _. _ .... ~ o Sr/Jo t>l:::l<~Eo~OCll ::: Pl:::l~oPl:::I<....~ 0"" cr":::l n 1J:l-,....o.....'" g.::r~ I-+) en -. 0 t"+ ('1) ~ ('1) @ oO"~:::l~g::::lO"~~tIl~ 3 .8 -, 0.. ~ [!t ~ ~ Q S' ~ '0 2' ::r: SPl. g.s: g n_, C ........:::: 3 '"tl g:@n1:;' v \J ~ en s:;. "::;' j;:;- (') en 8" ....... Pl 3 ~ 3 n o' ~ o. 8. E' ::r!ll @ ~ ;; g ~, (1) o. :::l Q P ~ @ S-;5, ~ n' - .... 0 ~ "'z ~~. O. n ~ Jg 0 ~ Dl:::l :to :::l9t1l2'~:::_> "'::r~ ~=. .... ~ "'" ~ ~ 8' ~. ~. g- [!t n g 0.. t:l Pl 0.. ..., ~ G' '" ;:; E' ~ g- ~ :::l ~ .......::r '" ~ .... ..., (1) 3 ::. '" :::l"" 0 '0 :>< o. ~ = ..... t:l _. en 0 ('t) """"t ""'t "'t::$ _ _. t "'~" (JCI ::: tn. 0.. 0 ..., :-' '" 3 -. :::l @ ~ 'g S. 3 Dl >-l ::r Pl ~ c:: Si (JCI.3. Pl ::: r6 ::r tn' S. (t :::l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~D.~.g.S~ ;- ::t!=l. ~ 0.. :g q ~ 8.. Pl ::r ~:- ;:; 0' ...., Pl cr" 0 '" '< ;- tn. g.:::l::r='< ;:!. ~ :::loDlcr"S- 8' I -, ~ (1) (1) ..., 3' '0 Pl n fil' ..., ~ fr (1) 0.. :::l 8. '" (1)'0 G' n ~ '" '" 'i::l '0 ..., o .3, :::l ~ '" n ~ .... n'OPlS- ga5.~ '" ~. 0.. 'g 2" 0. E; t.!2. ~ 5' ~ 0' (JCI.~ :::l g-s- 8 g 3 0.. ~ :::l .... '" 8' ..., otTl'"r1r/J(J :;:-Jg Pl g~' tn. s. 1=l S- 0 o' (1) tn. r/J -, :::l (1) n Pl S. 0 :::l (JCI tIl ciQ' :::l Si n Pl :::l n (1) o -, .... ::r (1) ..., ~ '" o ::: ..., ('l ro ~ < (1) ..., '" (1) S- (J tn' e; @ ~ -;' tn' 0 (tl 0 0 '-' o3'OPln::: '0 3 ::!. S- !=l. s:: ~ ::t. C;;' ~ a s' r:r ~ g ~, (t ..... (JCI ~ ;:;; . O_cnl""'f- ~ :::l'<og3- ::r ~ '" ..... c' Pl 0 :::l .... :t, ;:s ~~8..~cac:: :>< 8.. cr" E' 8.. :::l ].,<@ go '" ...., S- ....' S ..., r6::r(1)g. S- o.. (1) Q ~ Pl tn. ~(J~;::::-o '0 ....' 0 0 Dl 'Q. ] q ""'t ~ en o' ;:!. '" ;;>::l 0 .... :::l ~s-::r. 8' ::t go (1) ~ 3' ...,~.~:"''O 2' ~ o-~' ciQ. ~ g. (i' '0 _. :::l fil' (1) Pl3:::l Si.... ""'1 - C'D f"+ ("') 0 ~ :::l::rPl <'i::l....(1):::ls- Eo"" >0""(1) ::: Dl (JCI 0 - '" Pl ~ (1) ~ ~ .... :t, :.! 1=l :::l ~ 2 g!=l.:<s-n o o' 0 ~ cr" ~ -,:::l ..., :::l '< (1) ng:@~o o w tIl 0 ~ 5lso.::::< '-+..,('tlO:~ 2' (i' :::l 0 (t @ [ ~ ] '" n ~ Pl 0 (1):::l ::: "'.... en ~ ~. 0 ::: (1)~ !=l.-' g' (1) .... Pl :::l .... a N '-' ~QQ o t:l :::;- ~ ~ ~ ~ <Il t:l ~ - 0.. ::: '0 ;- :>< S- (1) S-'O (1) e; ;>;" @ 5' tn. 3 (JCI .... 0 (1) < 0.. Eo s' ~ - ~ ~o Cll ~ 1J:l.... ~' <'l ;: ~ 'S-)I 2 ~ ~ ~ <Il ~ ~~ t:l fi ~~ o <Il ::, ~ <'l Cll ~g 3 Eo ~-< Eo o '" ~ 2' ::r n tn. el 0 E' g Pl -, @ ~ "Ci' ~ el ::: 0 '0 @(t~a S' ("') &. -'"'0 f""4- g ~ =. ~ g 0:: ~ Jg 8.. n ::r Pl :::l (JCI ~~ go '2.. i~: 3' g- s- ;l ~ 3 ~ O'2..'2..!=l.(1):j o '" S-~ ~'O'O '"' s::::r~3:><@a~ 0' ~ c:r g e ~ ~. :::l S' 0.: :to ~ :.! ~ ~ ono..:::l.....,(1)tIl~ -'oo(JCI "''0<;, S-.a n Pl ~ S- 0 > (1)oE:'i::l::.:~5l~ ",...,8@ ::rO~ 2 ~ a ~ !f ~.: VJ go"':.!><og-c:::~ ::: :::l 0' Pl ~ ::!.- @ (tl ""i =,::1 Q ;;- ..o....O:::-o~ -,::r:::l~"':::l t"+ (tl ""'0'" -. en ,-...., ='0 - cr"~ ::t 'J " ..., Pl '< _. C ~ 8'.3.:::l 0.. =n n ~ _ (D t"+ (t) ("') 1"""1- ""': -n::r<Pl....t:l O....!=l.~:::l::r_ ~..., - n (1) -, <: ~ 0 ~ 'i::l ;:.:, Jg g Pl "S!. 0 a ~ ~ @ =~ ::;~. ~ ;::;'Pl cr"Pl::rn.... ~'O~:::l~....<'l a '2.. 5' 0.. @ S' ~ e; n' g ~. ~ ~. ~.a g 3~ ~ ?b ~ o. o Pl Pl ....,(t -~ ::ro.. ..., (1) r/J'i::l '0 ..., o .3. :::l ~ '" ('l o .... ..., '0 > ..., < o ~ '0 :::l ~ ::: Q-~ ....., Pl '0 'i::l 1'V~(6""'t ....., ~:] ~' ~ g. ?l 0 ~ ~ o.~. :::l :::l (1) O::!2~~Q ~: ~ ~ s. ~ s. ::!. ~. ::r 0 :::l:::l~r/J-' (JCI 0 ~ Miller Avenue Parking Structure Shadow Analysis 1/31/2008 Introduction/Summary The attached graphics were prepared by Watry Design, Inc. to analyze the affects of the proposed Miller Avenue Parking Structure on shadows for the adjacent properties. The Miller Avenue Parking Structure is a 412 story garage approximately 60' in overall height, to be located on the south side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue. Adjacent to the project site on the east side is a 10-unit apartment building (321 Miller), and the adjacent property west of the site is occupied by a 4-unit apartment building (337 Miller). The proposed structure will therefore increase shading of the east facing windows of 337 Miller in the morning, and the west facing windows of 321 Miller in the afternoon. The attached graphics depict the points in time where the affected windows begin to receive direct sunlight, and when shading begins, for both the sunniest and darkest days (the summer and winter solstices, respectively). These times are depicted for both with and without project conditions. Currently, the east facing windows of 337 Miller obtain direct sunlight for approximately 7 hours 20 minutes during the summer solstice and 5 hours 20 minutes during the winter solstice. The west facing windows of 321 Miller obtain direct sunlight for approximately 6 hours 10 minutes during the summer solstice and 2 hours 50 minutes during the winter solstice. With the project modeled at its proposed location, the east facing windows of 337 Miller obtain direct sunlight for approximately 20 minutes during the summer solstice and 10 minutes during the winter solstice. The west facing windows of 321 Miller obtain approximately 35 minutes during the summer solstice and 30 minutes during the winter solstice. ~--------'~------ ,/ /// //' / 'l L- ", "~'~ ~ '" ", -~ ~ //'/' // / /" /' // r1-t- OJ tf) r-t" "JD ., -<"" -0 -r "-0 "0'-, CD ~ m--- o OJ -r "')> n @ " tf) "'(I.) '"-,, OJ ~f -. ,~ "'~ . .~. ,:r o 0...;;.", CD ~ (J) c 3 3 CD -r (J) ~f ~ 01 o 0)' ""'- N N ~[ ~[ I J l~ ]~ C\I C\I ""'- CD '0 "- l.~ 1;j (5 (J) "- OJ E E :J (J) Ji 0'-, "- c.. l~' . . Ul "'C C ~W -"- uj"'~ Ul OJ U U <(~ "- CO '~ t ,OJ 'Q. 0'" "- c.. ._-~ L.~ OJ 1;j CO .'W CD ~ ~--------------~ -- - ----- /~ // / // // ~ /' /' / / /'~ ~ /~/ "- " ''-,., '-"'" "'. " "-- " '- '-. "- ',,- t ~ ~"., /' ". ". ...... ......., _//- >//- ...... .....,. ....., / // ./' / /' /// -----------.---------- ---------- ------------------------- / f""to" ro " :::l. '< '~, "'C ro ~'....... (J) o ~" )> n ~ en....."'" en .iI ::J''' en . . ~! 'rt ~,., ~. ro ~ 1 (J) c 3 3 ro ~.....r ~ n ro ::1:t: 01 o 0')' -- I\:) I\:) ..~. [ .~ ~[ I J 19: o ]~ C\I C\I -- ,CD o l~ lQ o Cf) L. OJ E ,E :::s Cf)' 1! l'~~ 'l..,' Vi' "'0 C W -"-" U') ~ u u ,< 's.. co o ---..",Cf) OJ ,0- "'- 0 ~ a.. ~ "'i: CD ::J:I: '~'" ~- /// ,/ // .// -' ---------------- -~ ---------. --------- ------------- [ // // ~// // '--.. ---.. '~ ---.. ~, ", "', ~ GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE South San Francisco, California for CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, California 94083 by Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. 330 Village Lane Los Gatos, California 95030 March 2007 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MILLER A VENUE PARKING STRUCTURE South San Francisco, California Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conclusions........ .....,..... ....... ........ ................... ............................................ ........... 1 Recommendations... ..... .............. ......................................... ........ ......................... 2 TECHNICAL REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION...... ................ .................... ........ ..... ..... ........... .................. ....... 3 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Work ................................................................... 3 2.0 PHYSICAL AND GEOLOGIC SETTING ...................................................... 4 2.1 Terrain ........ ....., .................. ........ ........ ........... .................. ..... .......... ........... 4 2.2 Geologic Setting ................................ ................... .................................... 4 2.3 Seismic Setting ............................... ..................................... ,.................... 4 2.3.1 Deterministic Analysis ............................................................... 5 2.3.2 Probabilistic Analysis ................................................................. 5 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS............................................................................................ 6 3.1 Surface Conditions......................................................... .......................... 6 3.2 Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................ 7 3.3 Groundwater Conditions ............. ........ ........... ..... .............. ..................... 7 4.0 POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS ................................................. 8 4.1 Seismic Hazards ....................... ......... ........................... ............................ 8 4.2 Settlement Behavior .....,........................................................................... 8 4.3 Cut and Fill Slope Static Stability .......................................................... 9 4.4 Sulfate Attack on Concrete ..................................................................... 9 4.5 Surficial Erosion ....................................................................................... 10 '. Table or Contents (cont.) 5.0 Page RECOMMENDA TIONS............................................................ ,...,.................... 10 5.1 Foundation Design Consideration ........................................................ 10 5.2 Foundation Design Criteria.................................................................... 10 5.2.1 Cast-in-Place Piers ...................................................................... 10 5.2.2 Shallow Foundations.................................................................. 11 5.3 Site Grading .............................................................................................. 12 5.3.1 Site Preparation ........................................................................... 12 5.3.2 Compacted Fill............................................................................ 12 5.3.3 Cut Slope Design......................................................................... 13 5.3.4 Utility Trench Backfiil................................................................ 13 5.3.5 Pavement/Garage Slab Subgrade Preparation........................ 13 5,4 Slab-on-grade and Concrete Flatwork .................................................. 13 5.5 Retaining Wall Design............................................................................. 14 5.5.1 Pier Supported Retaining Walls................................................ 14 5.5.2 Footing Supported Retaining Wails .................,....................... 15 5.5.3 Backdrain ........................................................... .... ...................... 15 5.6 Drainage ............ ..... ...... ................ ................... ..... .................... ................. 16 5.7 Seismic Design..... ........... ....... ................ ......... ........................ ..... ............. 16 5,8 Pavement Design ..........................................,.......................................... 16 5.9 Erosion Control........................................................................................ 17 5.10 Technical Review .,................................................................................... 18 5.11 Earthwork Construction Inspection and Testing ................................ 18 6.0 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS.................................................................. 18 7.0 REFERENCES. .......... ........ ............,....... ..................... ........................................... 20 7.1 Documents/Maps ..................................................................................... 20 APPENDICES A Field Investigation. ................. ........... ............. ........... .................. ............ ....... A-I B Laboratory Testing ......................................................................................... B-1 ii Table of Contents (cont.) FIGURES Follows Page 1 Site Location Map ........................................................................................... 3 2 Engineering Geologic And Boring Location Map ..................................... 6 3 Engineering Geologic Cross Section A-A'................................................... 6 APPENDIX FIGURES A-I Logs of Exploratory Borings .................................................................... A-Ho A-8 B-1 Summary of Triaxial Shear Testing.............................................................. B-1 APPENDIX TABLE B-1 Summary of Laboratory Test Results...................................................... .... B-2 iii Mr. Sam Bautista Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering Division CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P.o. Box 711 South San Francisco, California 94083 March 28, 2007 E0017 SUBJECT: RE: Geotechnical Investigation Miller A venue Parking Structure South San Francisco, California Dear Mr. Bautista: We are pleased to submit the following report describing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed new three-and-half story parking structure on Miller Avenue in South San Francisco, California. Our investigation was performed in accordance with our proposal for Geotechnical Services dated January 4, 2006. In this report, we characterize the geotechnical conditions underlying the proposed new parking structure, and provide conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical hazards, foundation types and design criteria, site grading, support of slab-on-grade floors, retaining wall design criteria, trench backfill, pavement design and erosion control. For clarity, we have provided an Executive Summary at the front of the report which presents an overview of our pertinent conclusions and recommendations. This summary is followed by our Technical Report. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call us. Very truly yours, COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ted Sayre Supervising Engineering Geologist CEG 1795 David T. Schrier Senior Geotechnical Engineer GE 2334 DTS:TS:POS::st EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this Executive Summary, we provide a summary of the pertinent conclusions and recommendations resulting from our Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed new three-and-half story parking structure on the Miller A venue in South San Francisco, California. A more detailed discussion of our findings, conclusions and recommendations is presented in the main body of this technical report. Conclusions · The site is feasible for construction of the proposed new three-and-half story parking structure, from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that the recommendations of this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. . The primary potential geotechnical hazards identified at the site include seismically induced ground shaking, differential settlement of the building foundation, and surficial erosion of graded areas. These potential hazards were determined to present varying degrees of potential risk to the proposed building, and should be considered in the design. . The site should be subjected to very strong seismic shaking within the life of the project. A peak ground acceleration of O.6g should be anticipated. . The proposed parking structure building site is generally underlain by alluvial fan deposits, and at depth, by Franciscan Complex greenstone bedrock. . We estimate that there is a low potential for liquefaction at the site. . We anticipate that the very stiff, dense near-surface materials could settle up to 1 inch total under assumed shallow foundation loading, and an isolated 4-foot medium dense sand layer encountered in Boring No.5 could settle up to 1 inch under dynamic (seismic) densification/shaking. 1 Recommendations . The proposed parking structure building can either be supported on a continuous shallow footing foundation system bearing on in-place near-surface material, or on a cast-in-place drilled pier foundation extending at least 20 feet into the underlying alluvium. . Site grading for the structure should be within the capabilities of moderate conventional construction equipment (Le., excavators, dozers and drill rigs). The sandy material encountered in the borings could require casing to prevent caving and sloughing during pier drilling. . All permanent cut and fill slopes should have a maximum inclination of 2-1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical (2.5:1). All fill prisms should be keyed and benched into firm, in-place material. . Civil drawings and specifications should be reviewed by our office to confirm that the recommendations of this report are incorporated into the design of the project. . Earthwork construction activities should be inspected and tested by a representative of our office to confirm that the recommendations of this report are incorporated into the construction of the project. 2 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGA nON MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE South San Francisco, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation for the proposed new three-and-half story parking structure on Miller Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The proposed parking structure site is located on the southern side of Miller Avenue, between Maple Avenue and Linden Avenue (Figure 1). We performed our investigation between January 25, 2007, and March 28, 2007, for the City of South San Francisco in accordance with our proposal dated January 4, 2007. We understand that at this point planned improvements consist of constructing a new, 3-1/2-story structure. It is likely that during the design process, the project team will have modifications that may include additional structures. While we have not been provided with maximum dead-pIus-live wall loads for the proposed new buildings, we anticipate that they will be relatively heavy, as is typical for concrete framed structures. We understand that site grading may include excavating up to 5 to 8 feet of soil to set the lower floor of the parking structure below grade. 1.1 Pmpose and Scope of Work The purpose of our investigation was to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design. Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate surface and subsurface conditions; and (2) develop conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical hazards, site grading, foundation and retaining wall type and design criteria, and recommendations for pavement sections. The specific scope of work performed for our investigation included the following tasks: 1) Review in-house geologic data and the topographic survey provided to us: 2) Subsurface exploration; 3) Laboratory testing of representative earth materials; 4) Geologic and geotechnical engineering analyses; and 3 5) Preparation of this report. 2.0 PHYSICAL AND GEOLOGIC SETTING 2.1 Terrain The proposed Miller Avenue site parking structure is situated on the southern flanking slope of Sign Hill, adjacent to the valley floor formed by Colma Creek. Current site topography is characterized by gently inclined east sloping terrain. Topographic relief across the site is roughly 9-1/2 feet with elevations varying from 52.8 feet at the northwestern comer of the site to 42.2 feet at the southeastern corner. A small concrete wall retains roughly 1/2-foot of material and separates the western two-thirds of the site from the eastern third. 2.2 Geologic Setting The Miller Avenue property is located on an alluvial fan situated between the Bay margin and the flanks of Sign Hill. The site is situated approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the San Andres fault which forms a boundary between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates. According to geologic maps of the area, the site is underlain by slope debris and ravine fills (Bonilla, 1971 and 1965). However, we encountered roughly 35 to 45 feet of alluvial materials overlying Franciscan Complex Greenstone bedrock. Alluvial materials have likely been transported downslope by the local creeks and streams and deposited on the fans during periods of high flows. 2.3 Seismic Setting The site is situated in a very seismically active area. Historically, this area has been subjected to very strong shaking from major earthquakes and the site will continue to experience very strong ground shaking in the future. The significant active faults located closest to the site are the San Andreas fault (2.5 miles/4 km toward the southwest), the San Gregorio fault (7.9 miles/12.6 km toward the southwest), and the Hayward fault (12.7 miles/20.3 km toward the northeast) (Figure 2). 4 2.2.1 Deterministic Analysis - The site could be affected by seismic shaking stemming from earthquakes on anyone of several major active earthquake faults in the region. The following table provides the results of our deterministic analysis and lists the major earthquake sources, the distances from the sources to the site, the maximum Moment Magnitudes and the peak horizontal ground accelerations that are anticipated at the site. Fault Source Distance (mi/km) Moment Magnitude1 Peak Horizontal Acceleration (g)2 San Andreas (1906 Segment) 2.5/4.0 7.9 0.50 San Gregorio 7.9/12.6 7.3 0.34 Hayward (Total Length) 12.7/20.3 7.1 0.18 1Based on "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment For The State of California" by CDMG, DMG Open-File Report 96-08. 2Based on attenuation relationships developed by Bozorgnia, Campbell & Niazi 1999, (horizontal component - Pleistocene soil, corrected); as determined using the computer program EQFAULT by Blake, 1989, and updated 2004. 2.2.2 Probabilistic Analysis - We also performed a probabilistic analysis employing the computer program FRISKSP (By T.F. Blake, 1988 and updated 2004) and incorporated moment magnitudes from the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) publication "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment For The State of California" (DMG Open-File Report 96-08), and attenuation relationships by Bozorgnia, Campbell & Niazi 2000 (horizontal component - Pleistocene soil, corrected). The results of our probabilistic analysis indicate that an acceleration for a Design Basis Earthquake (10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years, or a 475-year return period, which is generally used for residential and commercial buildings) is 0.60g. 5 Taking into account the above Moment Magnitude earthquakes, the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) coefficients presented in Section 5.7, and the results of the deterministic and probabilistic approaches, it is our opinion that the site could experience a peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) between 0.50g (equal to the deterministic acceleration calculated for an earthquake on the San Andreas fault for the site) and 0.60g (equal to the probabilistic analysis for a Design Basis Earthquake). It should also be noted that findings of strong motion research from the Loma Prieta earthquake indicate that: 1) recorded ground motions generally exceeded predicted ground motions based on many of the available attenuation curves; and 2) topographic site effects resulted in local amplification of bedrock motion. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS The following statements summarize the site-specific conditions which, to varying degrees, influence the geotechnical suitability for the proposed parking structure on Miller A venue. 3.1 Surface Conditions The site has dimensions of approximately 140 feet by 150 feet, and is presently being used for at grade public parking. The site is bordered to the north by Miller Avenue, to the east by a 25-foot wide by 140-foot long single family residence lot (which we understand may be demolished and the site included in the project), to the south by Fourth Lane, and by a multi-family residential building to the west (Figure 3). The site is covered with asphaltic concrete pavement with concrete curbs, and a landscaped parking island. Vegetation in the parking island consists of several mature trees and bushes. 3.2 Subsurface Conditions We explored the subsurface conditions at the site by means of 5 exploratory borings. We logged the cuttings and samples from the borings to assist us in determining the site stratigraphy. Representative soil materials obtained from the borings were selected for laboratory testing. 6 Exploratory borings were located in the vicinity of the proposed new structure. In the borings, we generally encountered alluvial soil materials consisting of sandy silt, silty sand, sandy clay, sand, clayey sand, and silty clay, overlying Franciscan Complex Greenstone bedrock which extended to the depths explored. Generally, we classified the material as either very stiff (cohesive materials) or dense (cohesionless materials) with a few layers of medium dense (cohesionless materials); Boring CSA/SD-5 we encountered medium dense material between a depth of roughly 14 and 18.5 feet. Detailed logs of our exploratory borings, and the results of the laboratory tests performed on representative samples are presented in Appendies A and B, respectively. The results of our laboratory testing (Appendix B) indicate that the near-surface clayey soil material at the site has a low expansion potential and has relatively moderate to high shear strength. The subsurface distribution of earth materials beneath the existing site and proposed building is depicted on the Engineering Geologic Cross Section 1-1' (Figure 3). 3.3 Groundwater Conditions During drilling, we encountered groundwater in Borings CSA/SD-1 at depths of 36.0 feet. It should be understood that groundwater levels fluctuate seasonally, and that higher levels may occur at other times and/or locations. 4.0 POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS In the following section, we list identified potential geotechnical hazards at the proposed site, along with the corresponding degrees of determined potential risk, and recommendations for possible mitigation measures. 4.1 Seismic Hazards Seismic ground shaking associated with a large earthquake on either the San Andreas, San Gregorio or Hayward fault is considered to be a moderate to high potential hazard 7 in the project area. Peak ground accelerations up to 0.60g should be anticipated at the site (see report Section 2.2). No active faults have been recognized on, or mapped through, the subject property. Thus, the potential for surface faulting and ground rupture on the property is considered to be low. Seismically-induced ground failure mechanisms include: lateral spreading, landsliding, liquefaction, lurching, and differential compaction. Due to the relatively very stiff and dense subsurface materials combined with the significant depth to groundwater, the potentials for lateral spreading, landsliding, liquefaction, and lurching is considered to be low. However, the potential for differential densification of one or two medium dense sandy layers underlying the site is considered to be moderate due to the medium dense sands encountered in Boring CSA/SD-5. We calculated that the conservative total or differential settlement of the ground surface due to dynamic densification of the sandy material could be up to 1 inch (using a conservative, simplified version of the procedure outlined by Tokimatsu and Seed, 1987). Due to the low potential for dynamic densification to occur combined with the apparent isolated layer of medium dense sands, we conclude that specific mitigation for dynamic densification is not required. 4.2 Settlement Behavior Based on our analysis, there is a moderate potential that the alluvial soil materials encountered in the borings will compress under the allowable bearing capacity static building loads. Compression of the alluvium could result in relatively minor amounts of differential foundation movement. Although a shallow footing could provide satisfactory support; in the event that the estimated settlements are too large, we have provided alternative recommendations for supporting the new parking structure on cast-in-place drilled piers (deep foundations). For our static settlement calculations, we assumed that a shallow foundation supported structure would have a dead-plus-Iong-term-live-load of approximately 2,750 pounds per square foot (psf) (equal to the allowable bearing capacity). Based on this 8 assumption, we estimate that total static settlement for a shallow foundation supported structure should be roughly 1 inch, and differential settlements should be less than 1/2 inch across the bottom of the building. A cast-in-place deep pier foundation system should experience total and differential settlements between piers of less than 1/2 inch due to static loading. Assuming that the piers will extend at least to a depth of 26 feet (7-1/2 feet below the identified zone of sandy soil susceptible to dynamic densification), a cast-in-place deep pier foundation system should eliminate the potential for significant settlement due to dynamic densification. 4.3 Cut and Fill Slope Stability Likely site grading includes an excavation for the planned subsurface parking. Based on the results of our field reconnaissance of the area, and the apparent shear strength of the material encountered in the borings, there is moderate potential that temporarily un- braced cut slopes could creep, slough and/or erode. We are not aware of any planned fill slopes for the project. We assume that a retaining wall will support the outer edge of the planned subsurface section of the parking structure. Suitable shoring should be constructed to brace temporary cuts and reduce the potential for off-site distress to adjacent structures and utilities. As an alternative, temporary cuts should be setback a suitable distance from the property line. 4.4 Sulfate Attack on Concrete The soils encountered in the borings appear to be have moderate to low cohesion, low gypsum content, and consequently should have a low to moderate potential for concrete sulfate attack. However, we recommend that corrosivity testing be completed on the near surface site soils prior to completing the concrete mix design in order to confirm the estimated low potential for corrosivity to metallic and concrete structures. 9 4.5 Surficial Erosion Based on our experience, the alluvial material has a moderate to high susceptibility to surficial erosion. To mitigate this potential, we have provided recommendations for erosion control and surface drainage collection. 5.0 RECOMMENDA nONS 5.1 Foundation Design Considerations The principal factors affecting foundation type selection include the following: acceptable magnitudes of differential settlement from static loading; and the isolated zone of medium dense sand encountered in Boring CSA/SD-5, associated potential for dynamic densification and minor differential settlement. The advantages of deep foundations include: 1) deep foundations extending below the zone of dynamic densification will not be susceptible to minor differential settlement; and 2) under static loading, deep foundations will tend to settle less than shallow foundations. If these advantages of a deep foundation are not deemed significant enough to the Oty to justify potential cost increases associated with the deep foundations, then the proposed parking structure could be supported on shallow foundations. However, if these advantages are deemed important by the Oty, then we recommend that the parking structure be supported on a deep (pier and grade beam) foundation. Recommendations for deep foundations, and shallow foundations are presented in the following section of this report. 5.2 Foundation Type and Design Criteria 5.2.1 Cast-in-Place Piers - The planned parking structure can be supported by a reinforced concrete pier and grade beam foundation systems. The drilled, cast-in- place piers should derive vertical support from skin friction in firm natural alluvial material as determined in the field by the project geotechnical engineer at the time of construction. Piers should be sized according to the following criteria: 10 Vertical Capacity - minimum three (3) pier diameter spacing Minimum pier diameter......................................................... 18 inches Minimum pier penetration.................................................... Elevation 32 (At least 7-1/2 feet below medium dense sand layer) Allowable adhesion (skin friction), for reinforced concrete dead plus live loads: o to 2 feet into soil material.................................................... 0 psf Below 2 feet in soil material................................................... 600 psf Lateral Passive Resistance - piers [equivalent fluid pressure applied over an effective width of two (2) pier diameters] o to 2 feet in soil material....................................................... 0 pcf Below 2 feet in soil material...................................................450 pcf The above adhesion value (skin friction) can be increased by 1/3 for seismic loading and should be decreased by 1/2 for uplift. The upper portion of the piers should be formed to create vertical surfaces, and "mushrooming" of pier tops and overpours around grade beams should be prevented. Drilled pier holes should be machine cleaned of all loose material prior to the placement of steel and concrete. Piers should be steel reinforced with a cage including a minimum of 4, No.5 bars vertical (with greater reinforcement as required by the project Structural Engineer). Casing could be necessary to prevent the cohesionless materials encountered in our borings from caving. If water is present in the pier holes, prior to placing concrete, the water should be pumped out until the pier holes are dry, or the concrete should be poured by tremie methods to displace the water. All piers should be connected at their tops by continuous grade beams. The grade beams should be embedded at least 9 inches below pad grade. 5.2.2 Shallow Foundation - If a shallow foundation system is selected, the footings should be at least 24 inches wide, and founded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The footings should be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 2,750 pounds per square foot (psf) for dead-plus-live loads, and 4,125 psf 11 under total loads, including wind or seismic forces. Resistance to lateral loads should be computed using a concrete/soil base friction coefficient of 0.35 and 400 pcf equivalent fluid passive resistance beginning below an embedment depth of 1 foot. 5.2 Site Grading Based on our field investigation, grading excavations should be within the capabilities of moderate conventional excavation equipment (Le., excavators, dozers and drill rigs) and should not require significant dewatering to the anticipated depths of excavation, provided that construction takes place during the dry season. The sandy material encountered in the borings could require casing to prevent caving and sloughing during pier drilling. It should be noted that we encountered refusal in one of the small-diameter borings (CSA/SD-4) at depth in greenstone bedrock, consequently heavy drilling equipment will be necessary for piers extending into the bedrock. 5.3.1 Site Preparation - All loose material, vegetation, asphaltic concrete, abandoned foundations, debris, and other deleterious material should be stripped and removed from the areas to be developed. This material should be disposed of in a suitable location off site or stored on site for later use in landscaping. Excavation should proceed as necessary for planned grades. Soft and/or yielding materials in the location of the planned structures should be over-excavated and replaced with compacted fill. Areas to be filled should be scarified to at least an 8-inch depth, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D-1557-00. Following site preparation, it maybe necessary to place fill in order to achieve the necessary sub grade elevation. The total amount of material removed during site preparation could range between 4 and 12 inches or more, but the actual amount can only be determined during construction. 5.3.2 Compacted Fill - The excavated on-site materials can be re-used as compacted fill provided they are free of organic matter and material larger than 4 inches in diameter. Imported fill should be free of organic material; it should contain no 12 material larger than 4 inches and should have a plasticity index of less than 16. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction beneath structures and 18 inches below the aggregate base rock for pavements, and 90 percent relative compaction elsewhere. 5.3.3 Cut Slope Design - Any new permanent cut slopes should not exceed an inclination of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical (2:1) in alluvium, without detailed geotechnical studies to evaluate their stability. During the dry season, temporary cut slopes of 1.75 horizontal to 1 vertical (1:1) in alluvium, should be satisfactory for construction purposes, provided that they are inspected and approved by our field representative at the time of construction. 5.3.4 Utility Trench Backfill - Utility trenches should be backfilled with soil that meets the requirements for compacted fill, provided that bedding materials for pipes are in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of maximum dry density in non-structural areas and a minimum of 95% of maximum dry density beneath structures and in the upper 18 inches of pavement subgrades. Equipment and methods should be used that are suitable for work in confined areas without damaging the conduits or the walls. Special care should be taken to ensure that utility trenches which extend under the perimeter footing are backfilled with clayey (low permeability) soils for a distance of 3 feet in both directions. 5.3.5 Pavement/Garage Slab Sub grade Preparation - After general compaction and compaction of the utility trench backfills, the pavement sub grade surface should be checked for yielding areas by proof-rolling with a loaded water truck or equivalent. Any yielding areas should be excavated and replaced with compacted fill. Then the upper 18 inches should be moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content, and the soil should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. 13 5.4 Slabs-on-Grade and Concrete Flatwork Slabs-on-grade and concrete flatwork sub grades should be prepared as recommended in Site Grading, above. The concrete flatwork (sidewalks and patios) should be supported on at least 6 inches of non-expansive, moist, compacted fill. Slabs and flatwork should be steel reinforced with at least No.4 bars at 24-inch centers each way, and provided with crack control joints at maximum 10 feet on centers. Slab-on-grade driveways should be at least 6 inches thick. 5.5 Retaining Wall Design The following section provides our recommendations for both the structure retaining walls and the site retaining walls. Retaining walls should be designed to resist an equivalent active fluid pressure of 40 pcf for horizontal backfill (only type of backfill assumed). The active lateral fluid pressure should be increased by 50% for walls that are restrained from rotation (building walls). For seismic loading apply a dynamic resultant force acting at 0.6H from the bottom of the wall and equal to an equivalent fluid pressure of 15H2 pcf. The lateral loads on the retaining wall can be resisted by passive pressures of 400 pcf equivalent fluid pressure for wall foundations bearing at least 1 foot below adjacent ground surface (neglect the upper foot for passive resistance) and a coefficient of friction equal to 0.35. 5.5.1 Pier Supported Retaining Walls - Pier foundations should be designed according to the Foundation Design Criteria provided above. The retaining walls that are free to rotate should be designed to resist an active lateral fluid pressure of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for horizontal backfill. The above active lateral fluid pressures should be increased by 50% for walls that are restrained from rotation (building walls). The lateral loads on the retaining wall can be resisted by passive pressure against the side of the piers using the lateral passive resistance provided in Cast-in-Place Piers foundation design criteria, above. For seismic loading apply a dynamic resultant force acting at 0.6H from the bottom of the wall and equal to an equivalent fluid pressure of 15H2 pcf (where H is the height of the wall). 14 If walls are planned adjacent to ground level parking or used to support the driveway entrance, a traffic surcharge of 100 psf should be included and applied against the top 10 feet of the retaining wall. 5.5.2 Footing Supported Retaining Walls - Footings should be designed according to the Foundation Design Criteria provided above. Site retaining walls free to rotate should be designed to resist an active lateral fluid pressure of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The above active lateral fluid pressures should be increased by 50% for walls that are restrained from rotation (building walls). The resistance to lateral loads should be computed using the lateral passive resistance provided in Shallow Foundation design criteria, above. If additional lateral resistance is required, and as an alternative to excavating a deep, continuous foundation key, shallow piers can be used to support the wall, using the same passive resistance criteria acting over two pier diameters. For seismic loading apply a dynamic resultant force acting at 0.6H from the bottom of the wall and equal to an equivalent fluid pressure of 15H2 pd (where H is the height of the wall). If walls are planned adjacent to ground level parking or used to support the driveway entrance, a traffic surcharge of 100 psf should be included and applied against the top 10 feet of the retaining wall. Lower terraced walls should to be designed to resist the combined heights of all walls that are bearing within an imaginary l(H):l(V) line extended up from their base. 5.5.3 Backdrain - Backdrains should be constructed behind all retaining walls. The backdrain should be a minimum 12-inch wide continuous blanket of either Caltrans Class 2 Permeable Material or 3/4-inch x l/2-inch clean crush drainrock enclosed in Mirafi 140N (or approved equivalent) filter fabric, and extended to within 1 to 1-1/2 feet of the ground surface where an impervious fill and/or asphaltic concrete cap should be placed. A minimum 4-inch diameter PVC Schedule 40 perforated drain pipe should be placed near the bottom of the drainrock (perforations down), surrounded by a minimum of 4 inches of drainrock with at least 2 inches of drainrock underlying the pipe. All backdraiIl pipes should be sloped to drain at a minimum of 1/2 percent and collected in 4-inch diameter non-perforated Schedule 40 PVC pipes which are sloped a minimum of 15 16 While no R-value tests were performed, based on a conservatively assumed (for the site soil conditions) R-value of 10, and an assumed Traffic Index (TI) of 5 (corresponding to relatively light loading and service vehicle use), we recommend that the pavement section should consist of a minimum of 3 inches thickness of asphaltic concrete 5.8 Pavement Design A peak ground acceleration of 0.50g to 0.60g should be anticipated for design purposes. With respect to the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) seismic design criteria, the San Andreas fault should be assumed as the controlling fault, and the following values should be used for design: Seismic Coefficients Ca and Cv of 0.54 (based on a Na of 1.2) and 1.04 (based on a Nv of 1.6), respectively. 5.7 Seismic Design Where concrete curbs are used to isolate landscaping in or adjacent to the pavement areas, we recommend that the curb extend a minimum of 8 inches into the low permeable material below the base rock to provide a barrier against the migration of landscape water into the pavement section. Because of the detrimental influence of water as it interacts with soil, foundations, pavements, and cut and fill slopes, it is important that surface water be controlled in the project area. Grades should be sloped to drain at a minimum of 2% for a distance of at least 10 feet out from structures with runoff directed into an appropriate catch basin/storm drain system. Unless draining onto well-drained (away from the structure) impervious surfaces, all roof runoff should be collected in gutters with downspouts tied into buried tightline pipes (PVC Schedule 40) that also discharge into a catch basin/storm drain. The catch basin/storm drain should discharge into the City storm drainage system or the paved access road, well downslope of the structures. 5.6 Drainage 2 percent and discharged into the site or City storm drainage system. The exterior retaining wall backdrains should also discharge to a suitable location away from structures, or onto an impermeable surface. underlain by a minimum of 6 inches thickness of virgin (non-recycled) aggregate base rock compacted to a minimum of 95% of maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00). The pavement subgrade should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned to greater than optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557-00) to form an unyielding surface. At the City's request an R- value could be performed to confirm the assumption. Asphaltic concrete should be placed and compacted in accordance with the requirements of Section 39 of the Caltrans Standard Specifications; aggregate base rock should conform to the provisions of Section 26 (Caltrans) for 3/4-inch maximum Class 2 Aggregate Base. 5.9 Erosion Control All graded slopes higher than eight (8) feet, and steeper than 20 percent (5:1) should be covered with a securely staked erosion control blanket consisting of straw and coconut fiber and treated with hydroseed prior to exposure to rain. All other grounds disturbed by construction activities should be treated with hydroseed prior to exposure to rain. An approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) should be implemented in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications. If freshly graded slopes are exposed to rain, this plan should include properly keyed and staked straw bale barriers at the base of the slopes higher than eight feet and steeper than 20 percent. 5.10 Technical Review Supplemental geotechnical design recommendations should be provided by our firm based on specific design needs developed by the other project design professionals. This report, and any supplemental recommendations, should be reviewed by the contractor as part of the bid process. It is strongly recommended that no construction be started nor grading undertaken until the final drawings, specifications, and calculations have been reviewed and approved in writing by a representative of our firm. 17 18 This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called the attention of the project engineer and incorporated into the plans. Furthermore, it is also the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. Any recommendations and/or design criteria presented in this report are contingent upon our firm being retained to review the final drawings and specifications, to be consulted when any questions arise with regard to the recommendations contained herein, and to provide testing and inspection services for earthwork and construction operations. Unanticipated soil and geologic conditions are commonly encountered during construction which cannot be fully determined from existing exposures or by limited subsurface investigation. Such conditions may require additional expenditures during construction to obtain a properly constructed project. Some contingency fund is recommended to accommodate these possible extra costs. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted engineering geology and geotechnical engineering principles and practices. No warranty, expressed or implied, or merchantability of fitness, is made or intended in connection with our work, by the proposal for consulting or other services, or by the furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. The investigation was performed and this report prepared for the exclusive use of the client, and for specific application to proposed site development as outlined in the body of the report. 6.0 INVESTIGA nON LIMITATIONS All excavations including foundations and pier drilling should be inspected by a representative of our firm prior to placing rebar, backfilling, and/or pouring concrete foundations. Any grading should also be inspected and tested as appropriate to confirm adequate stripping, sub grade preparation, and compaction. Our office should be contacted with a minimum of 48 hours advance notice of construction activities requiring inspection and/or testing services. 5.11 Earthwork Construction Inspection and Testing 7.0 REFERENCES 7.1 Documents/Maps Blake, T. F., 1989, EQFAULT, FRISK, UBCSEIS, LIQUEFY2: A Computer Program for the Deterministic Prediction of Peak Horizontal Acceleration from Digitized California Faults; A Computer Program for the Probabilistic Prediction of Peak Horizontal Acceleration from Digitized California Faults; Computation of 1997 UBC Seismic Design Parameters; A computer program for the determination of liquefiable soils. Windows Versions, Users Manual, July, 1989, updated 2004. Bonilla, M.G., 1971, Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Francisco south quadrangle and part of the Hunter's Point quadrangle, California: United States Geological Survey (USGS) Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-311, 2 sheets, scale 1:24000. Bonilla, M.G., 1965, Geologic Map of the San Francisco South Quadrangle, California: United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1 sheet, scale 1:20000. Bowles, J.E., Foundation Analysis and Design, Third Edition, 1982, McGraw-Hill Book Company. Bozorgnia, Y., Campbell, K. W. and Niazi, M. 1999, Vertical Ground Motion: Characteristics, Relationships with Horizontal Component, and Building Code Implications, Proceedings of the SMIP99 Seminar of Strong Motion Data, Oakland, California. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1997, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California: Special Publication 117. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment For The State Of California: CDMG Open-File Report 96-08. Lawson, A.c. (chairman), 1908, The California earthquake of April 1906-report of the state earthquake investigation commission: Carnegie Institution of Washington publication no. 87, vol. 1, part 1. Schmertmann, J.H., Static Cone To Compute Static Settlement over Sand Bases, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM3, 1976. 19 20 u. S. Department of the Navy, 1982, Design Manual Soil Mechanics, Foundations, and Earth Structures, NA VFAC DM-7.2. Tokimatsu, K. and Seed, H. B., 1987, Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v. 113, p. 861-878. Tomlinson, M.J., Pile Design and Construction Practice, Third Edition, A Viewpoint Publication, 1987. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, 1. M., 1982, Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph No.5, 134 p. Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California, Recommended Procedures For Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines For Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California. APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION We explored subsurface conditions at the site of the planned parking structure in South San Francisco, California on January 25 and 26, by means of five borings drilled to depths of 26-1/2 to 51-1/2 feet using truck-mounted, hollow stem auger equipment. The location of the borings is shown on Figure 3. The engineering geologist who logged the borings visually classified the soils in accordance with ASTM D-2487. We obtained relatively undisturbed samples of the materials encountered at selected depths. These samples were obtained in brass liners that were 2.5 inches in outside diameter and 6 inches long; the liners were inside a 3-inch diameter modified split-barrel California Sampler. The sampler was driven with a 140-pound hammer that was raised by an automatic hammer and allowed to freely fall about 30 inches. We also performed Standard Penetration Tests at selected depths. The depths of the sampling (and penetration testing) are shown on the boring logs. The bold number at the conclusion of the sampling interval represents the corrected blow count from a modified California sampler to Standard Penetration Test value accomplished by multiplying the blow count by 0.68. Descriptive logs of the borings are presented in this appendix. These logs depict our interpretation of the subsurface conditions at the dates and locations indicated, based on representative samples collected at roughly a five-foot sampling intervals. It is. not warranted that they are representative of subsurface conditions at other times and locations. The contacts on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between earth materials, and the transitions between these materials may be gradual. A-1 B-1 1. Detailed soil description ASTM D 2487; 2. Natural moisture content of the soil ASTM D 2216; 3. In-situ density of the soil (wet and dry); 4. Triaxial shear strength testing ASTM D 2850; 5. Atterberg limits determination, ASTM D 4318; and 6. Percent minus the No. 200 sieve, ASTM D 1140. The following laboratory tests were performed as part of this investigation: The laboratory analysis performed for the site consisted of limited testing of the principal soil types sampled during the field investigation to evaluate index properties and strength parameters of subsurface materials. The soil descriptions and the field and laboratory test results were used to assign parameters to the various materials at the site. The results of the laboratory testing program are presented on the boring logs and in this appendix (Table B-1, and Figure B-1). APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE January 30,2008 Prepared for: City of South San Francisco Prepared by: Mark D. Crane, P.E. California Registered Traffic Engineer (#1381) CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP 2621 E. Wind rim Court Elk Grove, CA 95758 (916) 647-3406 ]/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page] MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP 3. Large, easy-to-read signs should be employed on the streets in downtown South San Francisco providing directions to the new garage. 2. All six analyzed intersections along either Grand Avenue or Miller Avenue in downtown South San Francisco are now operating at acceptable levels of service during both the lunchtime and PM commute peak traffic hours. The new as well as redistributed existing traffic in the downtown area accessing the proposed garage would not be expected to produce any significant operational changes to any intersection. 1. The proposed garage, if successful, would be expected to generate about 145 new inbound and 145 new outbound vehicles to/from the project site during the lunchtime peak traffic hour, with about 105 new inbound and 105 new outbound vehicles to/from the project site during the evening commute peak traffic hour. These vehicles are in addition to the existing 30 inbound/outbound midday peak hour and 20 inbound/outbound PM peak hour vehicles now accessing the surface lot on the project site, that would transfer to the new garage. III. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The City of South San Francisco is proposing to build a multi-story parking garage in the downtown section of the City that would contain up to 256 parking stalls. The garage would be built on the site of an existing 60-space surface parking lot owned by the City, providing a net increase of 196 parking spaces downtown. The garage would be located on the south side of Miller Avenue about midway between Linden Avenue and Maple Avenue and would extend to the 4th Lane Alley (see Figure 1). Inbound and outbound access to the garage would only be provided from Miller Avenue: no access would be provided to the 4th Lane Alley. In addition to the new parking spaces, the garage would also have up to 13,700 square feet of net new retail commercial use along the project's first floor Miller Avenue frontage. II. PROPOSED PROJECT This study has been prepared at the request of the City of South San Francisco to determine circulation impacts in downtown South San Francisco resulting from operation of a proposed 256-space multi-story parking garage along Miller A venue (between Linden A venue and Maple Avenue). Midday (lunchtime) and evening commute period traffic counts have been conducted at three major intersections along Miller Avenue and at three major intersections along Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed garage. Existing operating conditions have then been determined at each location. The change in downtown circulation patterns have been projected with the opening of the garage and resultant operating conditions determined at the six analysis intersections for midday and evening commute conditions. Finally, assessment has been made of any improvement needs along Miller A venue at the garage access location. I. INTRODUCTION 4. Incentives should be provided to encourage shoppers/restaurant patrons/business people to park in the new garage. 5. Bright lighting and security should be top priority items to maintain continued use of the new garage. 6. A short (50- to 75-foot-Iong) left turn lane should be provided on the westbound Miller A venue approach to the garage entrance. This will result in the loss of some on-street parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of the turn lane. 7. On-street parking should be prohibited on either side of the project's Miller Avenue driveway in order to provide acceptable sight lines assuming prevailing vehicle speeds on Miller A venue remain at least 35 miles per hour. IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS City Planning and Engineering staff selected six major intersections in the downtown area to determine impacts from the revised circulation patterns due to the new garage. Locations were: Grand Avenue/Airport Boulevard (signal) Grand Avenue/Linden Avenue (signal) Grand Avenue/Maple Avenue (signal) Miller Avenue/Airport Boulevard-U.S.lOI Southbound Off-Ramp (signal) Miller Avenue/Linden Avenue (signal Miller Avenue/Maple Avenue (all-way-stop) A. VOLUMES Weekday midday (noon to 2:00 PM) and evening commute (4:00 to 6:00 PM) traffic counts were conducted by Crane Transportation Group at each of the six analysis intersections in January 2007 (with two exceptions). Evening commute counts at the Grand Avenue/Airport Boulevard and Miller Avenue/Airport Boulevard intersections were conducted in December 2005 for initial use in the Genentech Master EIR. The overall peak traffic hours for the system of six intersections were determined to be 12: 15 to I: 15 PM and 5:00 to 6:00 PM. Volumes for these time periods are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. In addition to vehicular traffic, pedestrian crossings were also tabulated at most intersections and are presented in Figures 4 and 5 for the 12:15 to 1:15 PM and 5:00 to 6:00 PM periods. Currently, Miller Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed garage entrance has a two-way volume of about 480 vehicles per hour (vph) between 12:15 and 1:15 PM and a two-way volume of595 vehicles per hour between 5:00 and 6:00 PM. ]/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 2 MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP 1/30108 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 3 MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP Table 1 shows that all analyzed intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service (LOS B or C) during both the midday and evening commute peak traffic hours. Figure 6 provides a schematic presentation of approach lanes and control at each of the six analysis intersections. 3. Existing Operation The City of South San Francisco considers Level of Service D (LOS D) to be the poorest acceptable operation for signalized and all-way-stop intersections, with LOS E the poorest acceptable operation for unsignalized city street intersection turn movements. The City has no standards for turn movements from private driveways. 2. Minimum Acceptable Standards Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized intersection operation is also typically graded using the Level of Service A through F scale. LOS ratings for all-way stop intersections are determined using a methodology outlined in the year 2000 TRB Highway Capacity Manual. Under this methodology, all-way stop intersections receive one LOS designation reflecting operation of the entire intersection. Average control delay values are also calculated. Intersections with side streets only stop sign controlled (two-way stop control) are also evaluated using the LOS and average control delay scales using a methodology outlined in the year 2000 TRB Highway Capacity Manual. However, unlike signalized or all-way stop analysis where the LOS and control delay designations only pertain to the entire intersection, in side street stop sign control analysis LOS and delay designations are computed for only the stop sign controlled approaches or individual turn and through movements. The Appendix provides greater detail about unsignalized analysis methodologies. Signalized Intersections. Intersections, rather than roadway segments between intersections, are almost always the capacity controlling locations for any circulation system. Signalized intersection operation is graded based upon two different scales. The fIrst scale employs a grading system called Level of Service (LOS) which ranges from Level A, indicating uncongested flow and minimum delay to drivers, down to Level F, indicating signifIcant congestion and delay on most or all intersection approaches. The Level of Service scale is also associated with a control delay tabulation (year 2000 Transportation Research Board [TRB] Highway Capacity Manual [HCM] operations method) at each intersection. The control delay designation allows a more detailed examination of the impacts of a particular project. Greater detail regarding the LOS/control delay relationship is provided in the Appendix. 1. Methodology B. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE V. CHANGE IN DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC VOLUMES DUE TO PROPOSED GARAGE The proposed downtown garage will slightly increase volumes as well as change traffic flow patterns on downtown streets. Projections regarding expected changes in traffic flow have been worked out in consultation with City Planning and Engineering staff and are presented below in summary format. A. ANAL YSIS INPUT TO DETERMINE TRAFFIC FLOW IMP ACTS DUE TO THE NEW DOWNTOWN GARAGE . Traffic due to the 13,700 square feet of retail commercial activity on the ground floor of the garage will all be newly added to downtown streets. . Percent parking occupancy of the new garage (excluding traffic from the new retail/commercial uses) will be the same as that in the existing surface lot on the project site. Based upon surveys by City staff of parking activity in the existing 60-space lot (see Table 2), up to 85 percent of the spaces are occupied during lunchtime and up to 60 percent are occupied at 5 :00 PM. . There will not be a 100 percent turnover of occupied spaces at the garage during any given hour. A 65 to 70 percent turnover rate of occupied spaces has been utilized for analysis purposes. . Traffic activity associated with the existing 60-space lot on the project site is already occurring and part of the traffic count program recently conducted. Thus, the proposed garage will produce a net new circulation impact from an increase of 196 spaces on the project site (256 spaces in the proposed garage minus 60 existing spaces). . There will be a charge for parking in the garage, as there is today for parking in the surface lot on the project site. The exact charge is being developed by City staff. . Ten percent of the new parking demand at the garage (in addition to the new demand from the 13,700 square feet ofretail/commercial activity) will be due to drivers newly attracted to the downtown area due to greater ease of finding parking. The remaining 90 percent of the new parking demand at the garage will come from drivers already on the downtown roadway system that are now parking on-street or in other City parking lots. The new lot, when used, will eliminate some congestion by reducing the amount of driving around the block looking for parking along or as close as possible to Grand A venue. . The vast majority of demand to park in the new garage will come from existing drivers parking along Grand Avenue and Miller Avenue as well as Maple and Linden avenues north of Grand Avenue. . Signing will be provided in the downtown area directing drivers to the new garage. 1/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 4 MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP 1/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 5 MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP Source: Crane Transportation Group MIDDAY EVENING COMMUTE PEAK HOUR TRIPS PEAK HOUR TRIPS ACTIVITY IN OUT IN OUT Net New Spaces Turning 117 117 77 77 Over Each Hour New Retail/Commercial 25 25 25 25 Uses Total New Trips To/From 142 142 102 102 Proiect Site Existing Surface Lot Trips 30 30 20 20 Transferring to New Garage Total Trips Entering & In In 122 122 Leaving New Garage SUMMARY OF GARAGE TOTAL TRIP GENERATION MIDDAY EVENING COMMUTE PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR Maximum Net New Spaces 85% x 196 = 167 60% x 196 = 118 Occupied (excluding new retail) Net New Occupied Spaces 70% x 117 = 117 65% x 118 = 77 Turning Over Each Hour (Excluding New Retail) Source: Crane Transportation Group SUMMARY OF GARAGE TRIP GENERATION DUE ONLY TO USE OF NET NEW PARKING SPACES WITHIN GARAGE 256 ~ 196 = Proposed Garage Total Spaces Existing Surface Lot Spaces on Garage Site Net New Spaces Due to Parking Garage C. SUMMARY OF PARKING GARAGE TRIP GENERATION Table 3 shows that the proposed 13,700 square feet of retail/commercial activity on the fIrst floor of the garage would be likely to generate about 25 inbound and 25 outbound trips during the lunchtime peak traffIc hour with a similar number of in and outbound trips expected during the PM commute peak hour. Trip rates have been taken from the traffIc engineering profession's standard source of trip rate data, Trip Generation, 7th Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003. B. TRAFFIC GENERATION DUE TO 13,700 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL/COMMERCIAL USES IN THE NEW GARAGE D. RESUL TANT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH NEW DOWNTOWN GARAGE Figures 7 and 8 present the projected incremental change in traffic at the six analysis intersections due to the proposed downtown garage during the midday and PM commute peak traffic hours. Negative numbers for some movements reflect some drivers being diverted directly to the new garage and away from the pattern of circling the garage block attempting to find a parking stall along Grand Avenue and then, secondarily, along Maple Avenue, Linden A venue and Miller A venue. Projections also reflect vehicles leaving the garage by the one exit (to Miller A venue) and getting back on the local circulation system at one concentrated location rather than from a wide variety of on-street parking spaces and other City owned public parking lots. It should be noted that the incremental change in traffic shown does not include the vehicles currently entering and leaving the surface lot on the site of the garage. Traffic flow patterns for these vehicles would be expected to change slightly due to the removal of access to/from the existing parking lot to the 4th Lane Alley. Provision of the new garage would lower volumes now using 4th Lane Alley. E. CHANGES TO INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH THE PROPOSED GARAGE IN OPERATION Table 1 shows that with the proposed garage in operation there should be only one change in level of service and only insignificant changes in vehicle delay (of three seconds or less) compared to existing conditions at all analyzed intersections. Operation would remain an acceptable LOS B, C or D at all intersections. Delay would tend to decrease slightly at the Grand Avenue intersections and increase slightly at the Miller Avenue intersections. F. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT THE PROJECT ACCESS INTERSECTION WITH MILLER AVENUE 1. Need for Left Turn Lane on Westbound Miller Avenue Approach to the Garage Entrance During the midday peak hour there would be about 90 vehicles making a left turn from Miller Avenue into the new garage (or about 30 percent of the westbound traffic flow), while during the PM commute peak hour there would be about 65 vehicles making a left turn into the new garage (or about 15 percent of the westbound traffic flow). Left turn lane warrant criteria! for two-lane streets and roads have been developed for situations where vehicle speeds are greater than those along Miller Avenue (for speeds of 40 miles per hour or greater, not the 25 to 30 mile per hour speeds along Miller Avenue). If these higher speed criteria are used, the combination of through and turn volumes at the garage entrance would just meet the left turn lane warrant criteria during both the midday and PM commute peak traffic hours. Based upon the likelihood that if the garage is successful, there could be, on average, more than one vehicle per minute making a left turn into the garage during the midday peak hour and about one vehicle every minute making a left turn into the garage during the PM peak hour, I Intersection Channelization Design Guide, TRB Report 279, November 1985. 1/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 6 MARK D. CRANE, P.E. . CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP a short left turn deceleration lane would be highly desirable in order to reduce the potential for rear-end accidents (see Recommendations in Section VI). The exact location of the garage driveway connection to Miller Avenue has not yet been selected. However, if on-street parking along the south side of Miller A venue is allowed too close to the driveway, on-street vehicles could limit sight lines for drivers leaving the garage to less than acceptable lengths. VI. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Large, easy-to-read signs should be employed on the streets in downtown South San Francisco providing directions to the new garage. 2. Incentives should be provided to encourage shoppers/restaurant patrons/business people to park in the new garage. 3. Bright lighting and security should be top priority items to maintain continued use of the new garage. 4. A short (50- to 75-foot-long) left turn lane should be provided on the westbound Miller A venue approach to the garage entrance. This will result in the loss of some on-street parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of the turn lane. 5. On-street parking should be prohibited on either side ofthe project's Miller Avenue driveway in order to provide acceptable sight lines assuming prevailing vehicle speeds on Miller A venue remain at least 35 miles per hour. This Report is intended for presentation and use in its entirety, together with an of its supporting exhibits, schedules, and appendices. Crane Transportation Group will have no liability for any use of the Report other than in its entirety, such as providing an excerpt to a third party or quoting a portion of the Report. If you provide a portion of the Report to a third party, you agree to hold CTG harmless against any liability to such third parties based upon their use of or reliance upon a less than complete version of the Report. 1/30/08 South San Francisco Downtown Parking Garage Page 7 MARK D. CRANE, P .E. . CRANE TRANSPORT A nON GROUP Figures '$. \ A ~ If)o'' ~ y "6 't- I- Uw WI- -,- 00 a::: A. /IV Mli/eM Q) .. 'l"" en Q) .. .. u = Q) m .... u: f a. >- ." :l 1i5 u Ii: !!! I- " Ol m m Cl Ol c: :i2 m ll. c: ~ 1:: ~ o o 8 III .u c: m U: c: m en .c: :; o en c.. ::J o 0::: C) Z o i= <C I- 0::: o c.. en z <C 0::: I- W z <C 0::: () ~ <ll ~s 1, 'do l/'l,o ?- """",,,, -0 't- ~~ M ~.. ~ ~I"- ..-- I"- ~~ N ~O ..-- en ~ E .:! o > .. .! ::s ,~- J:U) N m~,,", ~ ,5 > .;.: ~ ~ ~ an m ';c 0 '!: u: W::I: N ~~ ~ ~ A. ~ ~ " ~ :E r~ 0') 1"-00 ..--Nco ..-- M ~~~ r ~ ~t~ O')..--N ~MLO ..--"-- Pll18 J.l0 '.J!tt ~ ~J N co ~ MCO ~.. 11 It sSeJd-f::; ~~ ~~ N ..-- I"- coco ..-- M COCO N ~~ M ..-- ..-- ~ LO I"-NLO ..-- ~~~ Fe;; ~~~ F~ ~J ~t~ ~J ~t~ /IV uepun LO "--N co ~ 0') ~ 0 co ~ ..-- 0') N ..-- LOCO ..-- ..-- co NO ~. ~. N"-- Do :J 0 0:: ~ C) ~ <( Z <( l:: "0 .... -J l:: 0 (]) .s ~ i= :::: ~ "t C!) c:( I- 0:: 0 ~8 ~~ c: Do :i2 UJ ..-- CO iii Z I"- ~LO ~~ D- c:( LOLOLO ~~ ONCO c: M"--CO ..-- N ~ 0:: 0 I- ~~~ ~~~ F~ "E F~ ~ w 0 Z /lvaldew 8 c:( ..--J ~t~ Ul 0:: ~J ~t~ '0 c: U t1l ~ u: 0') LO ~ 0 N c: ~ ~ coMco I"- M ..- 0 t1l CO NO')N CO Ul N T"" .c: ~. '5 ~. 0 en M CO ..- (l) JS ~ ~ Ul,O ?- ...........,. "0 -z. ~~ M ~. co ~..- N -l.~ oq- ~ co M II) Q) E :s '0 > . fa -- M = g g "' C._ n W .- .c CD ; '1i) Q) O' =.- > ._ >< 0 U.W.n :sin 0- ::c Jl: fa Q) D. :E D. r~ o !':::oq-oq- .., N M ..- (0 ~+~ rro ~t~ NLO(O ~oq-~ Pll18 J.lod.J/'rI ~ o o ..- ~J o ~~ ..- ~. 1I'r1 ssa.Jd,fO ~~ ~~ oq- ..- oq- oq- 0 oq- M ..- 10 0') 10 M 0') +- N (ONoq- .- ..- N N ~~~ F~ ~~L. r~ (OJ ~t~ ~j ~t~ "'rI uapun "- V 0 -... "-oq-O') CO -... (0 0 oq- N (010"- ..- CO 0') CO ~. ~. ..- c.. :J 0 0::: :::. :::. C> ":( c: ":( Z .... -J "0 0 ~ c:: :S ~ >- i= ""C ~ "t" <.!l ::l <( Vi 0 I- ~ 0::: f- 0 -t..ffi Q) c.. ~"- 0> !! VJ 0') m Z "- 10 CO t!l coo <0 +-~ O')NCO .-~ 0> <( c: NM<O (0 N :52 0::: ~~L. ..- ~~L. lii I- F~ r~ c.. c: W 3: Z 0 "'rI a/dew "E <( ~t~ ~j ~t~ 3: 0::: ~j 0 Cl (.) 0 0 0') 10 0 -... 0 "- In -... No 0 "- Ou ~ "- M oq- (0 c: N..- ..- 10 m ..- ~. N u: ~. c: m (/) .r:; :; 0 (/) 'So ~ J ~ ~ "" UlO'~ .,.... "'0 "t- Q.l c::C call! 'C 'iij - > l3 ca "0 III Q.l- a.c ::J o 0 Z u ~ CI) .. :s m u: en CI) E :s '0 > c ~ .-- ban -en~ WI CI) .. c_~ .- v . "CI)an .!! a. ~ >< .. W"N :s~ o_ X Jl: ~ CI) a. )\ ~ " " i Pilla /-10 'JIV II It sSeJd-f;) ..... I\Ii uapufl 0> 0> C\I I"- CD co ..r I"- a.. I"- :J 0 0 N ~ C) Z :::. Q <:( I- "t:l <( :::. t:: t:: I- <:( -J ~ ~ '- :S (!) 0 ~ ~ a.. ~ c: (/) ~ Z 1Il <( 0- c: ~ ~ I- 0 'E W ~ 0 z 0 <( 8 I\Ii a/dew Ul ~ '0 0 c: 1Il l"- ll: ~ co c: 1Il III .r; S 0 III 'So \ A ~ ~o,~ ...... "0 "'t- a.> cD lUll! ';:: 'ffi - :> :3 lU "'0 (/l a.>_ Q.c o ::J Z 8 In Gl ~ ::s m i:i: en Gl E ::s - o > C l'\S .-- -b 0 ..., en 0 c '" .. .- w CD ~"I .!! Gl 0 )(a.~ w~1n ::s- o ::c ~ l'\S Gl a. :E a. Pille po 'J!'rI 1111 SS9.1d,{O v 0 ..... Q') N C") co 1\\1' uapufl CD ..... CD I"- ..... ..... l"- V 0 c.. N => 0 D:: C) ::. Z q: 0 ::. c: "t:l t- q: -J c: <( .... .s ~ Q) t- :.:: "'I' (!) D:: :a: 0 c.. c: CJ) 32 Z lii v D- <( 0 c: D:: ;; C") ..... 0 t- C") ;: ;; W N 0 Z Cl C") 8 <( ..... 1\\1' aldew (/) D:: co Q') '0 () ..... c: C") 11l V ..... U: ..... c: ~ 11l IJ) ..... J:: l"- S 0 co IJ) ..... 0) J ~ '% 'd. Ul?- " <t "'6 "t- )~~~ r -. t ....J ~t PAIS lJO '.1ft! ~ -4 -. f At! SS09Jd;(Q )~ + ~ + "\7' uepuq -t ~t -t + c: .... ::J a. I- 0 - - ..c: (j) Ol >- ro a: ~ Q) :> c: Q) <;( ...!.. Ol .... :> "0 U5 u.. <;( t: <( -J t: II .... ~ II II (]) .s ::::: "'" C!) (De ~ ~ "\7' 09/dew e .. C o CJ " c C'a en (,) .- .. .. CD mQ) Q) .5 E .. .. 0 :s .!!! Q) .~ >C C) U. W Q) C C'a ...I C o ; (,) Q) l!! Q) .. C a.. ::J o e::: C) z o I- <C l- e::: o a.. en z <C e::: I- w z <C e::: (J c :i! i;; a. c ~ o " ~ o D ~ .0 C III u: C III rn .t: "5 o rn ~ 0)0 OlD roOl c.c: UJ:;:; o .!Q CD X 0lQ) c: Q) t3:5 'x :5 Q) .- 0) =: ~ "'C - Q) ~- _ ttl .~ 'g -om 0) rn -rottlQ) .- rn Ol g ~ ~ rn .~ ro rn ~ Ol ro Q) =: .~ :> Q) 1ijcDC: L.... ~ Q) -rn~ 0)-- -000 :JQ)- u'ea:; .~ c. 't5 o~fij c:_... oc:~ -oorn lG=:-ro Eg;:: :J_::= 'O..Qo > Ol- Q) c: Q) lG :g 16 ~ttlc. I- c. rn * s \ A~ \Il~,~ "0 '7- 1..0 'V CD 00..- o ..- ("') .J~~ ~-. ("') e~-y @~~ OOlD..- ("') ..- ..- ~~~ OOJ ..- ~ ~ ---+ IQ..- @!;t-y ~~ C;~ ~ t: C/,lO :::> @~ r-- t. 00 "It ..- +- r-- r--oo +- ~e ..- ..-Noo f~@ ..- ("') .J~~ f r-- 1..0 ~ @~J ~t~ PAle /.JO '.J!'r/ ("') 00 e~ -. ..- 00 ..- N @ ("')00 r--("')LO ~. ..- ..- ..- 6>8 /lit sse./dlfQ ~~G) ~ ~@) y~@ ~t~ "-N~ 1..000..- @@~ ~@) *rcm y*'@) ~ @ * @C@@ ~~@ 1..0 1..0 1..0 -"'-- '" r.;;t:'\ ("') ..- CD .....--- 1..0 \..!) ~ ~ ~ y~@ ~t~ *@ '> ~~ ~ ~ @~J r6\ '" ---+ IQlD ~-y lD("')CD N",N @~ * M\@ 'Or-- CDCDN r--NI..O ~~~ @~J tN\ ~ ---+ \.i)..- @~-y t: ....J J:: ~ @\@ Woo@ "'It 1..0 ONOO ..- N ~~~ @~J 8 ~ ---+ 8~-y ~~@ ~~8 CD "'It y ~t~ ..-",N OONO N"- @@@ '> <:( "0 t: ~ C!> ~~@ ~ to@ y~@ ~t~ o N ("')ro~ tM\N \d@ /I'r/ uepun /I'r/ a/dew Q) Ol ttl ... ttl C) Ol c: :;;: ... ttl 0.. -0 0) rn o c. o ... 0.. Q) Ol ttl ... ttl c.9 Ol c: :;;: ... ttl 0.. o - 0) :J "'C Q) Ol rn c: Q) ro E ~ :J 0 ~~ Ol Q) c: E :P Q) rn ... 'x 0 w c: >- 'tl ::J ii5 " liij t= Gl Cl I .. ~ CD@) ~ :;2 m Cl. c 3: o 1: 3: o D 8 III '0 c !!! u. c .. rn .c 'S o Ul en CI) E ... ~ u- CI) 0 .->- O~J.n ""-- ~ "t"" ,- D. ~ .. CI)..JIO"t"" ~"V:::tab ~ m~ "t"" .~ C ~ .. u..;CI)N en D. !:.. ';( ~ W ~ "CI ~ :E a.. ~ o a::: C) z o I- et I- a::: o a.. f/) z et a::: I- w z et a::: u ~ (])c u(O co Ol c..c: CJ'J+= c.!!? (0 x Ol(]) c: (]) ~-E .- .J:: ~~ (]) 3 .J:: "0 -(]) =(6 .~ 'g 'OlIl (]) III -roco(]) .- III Ol g ~ ~ III U co III E Ol co (]) :> U> ;> IE . ~ co (]) 5.... :!::: Q) -lIl.J:: (])-- 'Ouo :J(])- 13'e Q) .!: c.. (;j (5~~ c:_..... oc:~ "Colll :g3rn Eg::;: :J _ 3 0.2(5 > Ol- (]) c: (]) :g ~ ~ .J::coc.. I- c.. III * (I) So ~ A~ (/)~,~ 1> 't- v Vv LOLO o NC") ~~~ ~---. C") 8~-Y @)~@ vOv l!)C")(J) .J~l. (OJ fcQ\ ~ ---. \:I.JN @~l *@ :> ~~ Q) ~ 0@@ I"- roo (0 NC")(O .J~~ @~j fcD\ 0> ~ '2:)1"- ~l COo.. <: E c; ~ .,... c:: Cl)O :J ro -+-N f~@ ~ o o ...- (0 @f) I"-vv l!)NC") ...- (0 ~~~ 8~J o ~ ---. ...- ~-y ~~@ ~ ~tN\ N'0:J l~@ e~ ...-LO(J) (ONv .J~~ @gj 8 ~ ---. @~l ~t~ I"-vO> (Ol!)1'-- @@0 ~~ l*@ ~ @ ~[Oe ~~@ l~@ c:: .....J .s "'t @@rc;)I "'-O>\.i) ro 0> N ro (0 N .J~~ ~t~ Nol!) N...-C") w@@ @~j Q~ ~ e~, ~~ -+- ~e f [0 ~t~ Nl!)(O ~...,.~ @)e ~~ ~~e l~ Pilla /-10 '.J!V IIV SSeVdA"o (]) Ol ~ co ~ Ol c: :.s2 ..... co 0.. '0 (]) III o c- o ..... 0.. (]) Ol co ..... co <.9 Ol c: ~ ..... co 0.. o - (]) :J "C (]) Ol III c: (]) co E .J:: :J U om >1: Ol (]) .!: E ii5 ~ 'x g UJ_ /I'if uapun ~t~ (Oov OO(j)ro @@@ :> <:( '0 c:: ~ ~ ~ffiW ~~@ l~@ ~t~ Or--'" vm(O @@ /I'if a/dew >- 't:l ::l Ui lJ IE ~ l- I 1:, ~ to@ ~ c :ii! i;; (L c ~ o 1: ~ o Cl 8 en '0 c C1l u: c C1l en .r. "S o en III Gl ... E u ~ Gl_ .... 0 - ClOe>g Gl D. .. .. ....JI~CQ ~"UO. z:n ...0 ._ z:n... 0 LL. C .. .- ~ an "'ca- .~ Gl >CD. W:e D. Il. ::) o 0::: C> Z o t- <( t- o::: o Il. U) Z <( 0::: t- W Z <( 0::: o ~ Tables 1/30108 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Table 1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE MIDDAY EVENING COMMUTE PEAK HOUR (12:15-1:15 PM) PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM) EXISTING + EXISTING + INTERSECTION EXISTING CnD GARAGE EXISTING CBD GARAGE Grand Ave.lAirport Blvd. D-35.3ll) D-35.3 C-34.6 C-34.5 (Signal) Grand Ave.lLinden Ave. B-15.9ll) 8-15.4 B-15.1 B-14.9 (Signal) Grand Ave.lMaple Ave. B-IO.8ll) 8-10.6 B-1 1.8 B-1 1.8 (Signal) Miller Ave.lAirport C-28.01l) C-28.5 C-24.5 C-24.8 Blvd./U.S.IOI SB Off-Ramp (Signal) Miller Ave.lLinden Ave. C-31.3ll) C-32.6 C-32.3 C-33.5 (Signal) Miller Ave.lMaple Ave. B-IO.2(2) B-IO.6 B-13.8 C-15.6 (All Way Stop) (I) Signalized level of service-vehicle control delay in seconds. (2) All way stop level of service-vehicle control delay in seconds. Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group 1/30/08 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Table 2 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND 60-SPACE SURFACE LOT TO BE REPLACED BY PARKING GARAGE (WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2006) SPACES PERCENT TIME UTILIZED UTILIZED 11 :00 AM 35 58% 11 :30 AM 35 58% 12:00 Noon 48 80% 12:30 PM 51 85% 1:00PM 47 78% 1:30PM 38 63% 2:00 PM 41 68% 2:30 PM 38 63% 3:00 PM 34 57% 3:30 PM 32 53% 4:00 PM 31 52% 4:30 PM 34 57% 5:00 PM 33 55% 5:30 PM 32 53% 6:00 PM 31 52% 6:30 PM 30 50% 7:00 PM 31 52% Source: City of South San Francisco Public Works Department 1/30108 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Table 3 TRIP GENERATION USES ON GROUND FLOOR OF PROPOSED DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE MIDDA Y PEAK HOUR TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT IN OUT USE SIZE RATE VOL RATE VOL RATE VOL RATE VOL Specialty Retail 13,700 1.8 25 1.8 25 1.8 25 1.8 25 SQ.FT. Trip rate source: Trip Generation, San Diego Association of Governments, 2002. Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group J/30/08 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Appendix 1/30/08 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Appendix LEVEL OF SERVICE CONTROL DELAY RELATIONSHIP FOR ALL-WAY STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (in seconds) A 0- 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move up time to first in line at the intersection, stopped delay as first car in queue, and final acceleration delay. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board 1/30/08 SSF Downtown Parking Garage Appendix LEVEL OF SERVICE CONTROL DELAY RELATIONSHIP FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Control Delay Per Vehicle (in seconds) A 10 B > 10 - 20 C > 20 - 35 D > 35 - 55 E > 55 - 80 F > 80 Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move up time to first in line at the intersection, stopped delay as first car in queue, and final acceleration delay. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board 1/30/08 SSF Downtown Parking Garage YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFI the following itelTI on March 1 Arroyo Drive: City Council will discuss Services Building, 33 DISCUSSION ITEM: Miller Avenue Parking Structure Negative Declaration Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Stnlcture PROJECT Miller Avenue Parking Structure City of SSF Redevelopment Agency/applicant-owner Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) The Miller Avenue Parking Structure is proposed to be a 412 story public parking structure with up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor COnl1TIercial space, to be located on the three existing surface parking lots on the south side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040, 050 and 060) and the existing residential properties at 323 Miller Avenue (APN 012-312-070) in the Downtown COlTInlercial (D-C) Zoning District. Copies of the Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure are available for public review at the Orange Avenue Library 804 W. Orange Avenue, the Grand Avenue Library - 306 Walnut Avenue, Planning Division - 315 Maple Avenue and in the offices of the City Clerk - 400 Grand Avenue. If you have any questions, please call Chadrick Smalley, Associate Plamler, at (650) 877-8535 and FAX 650/829-6639. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING I, Krista Martinelli -Larson, certify that I caused to be posted the notice of Public Hearing in the areas designated on February 29, 2008. Courtesy Notice MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the City of South San Francisco City Council will discuss the following item on March 13,2008 at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, 33 Anoyo Drive: DISCUSSION ITEM: Miller Avenue Parking Structure Negative Declaration Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure PROJECT Miller Avenue Parking Structure City of SSF Redeveloplnent Agency/applicant-owner Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) The Miller Avenue Parking Structure is proposed to be a 4V; story public parking structure with up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor commercial space, to be located on the three existing surface parking lots on the south side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040, 050 and 060) and the existing residential properties at 323 Miller Avenue (APN 012-312-070) in the Downtown COlnmercial (D-C) Zoning District. Copies of the Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure are available for public review at the Orange Avenue Library - 804 W. Orange Avenue, the Grand Avenue Library 306 Walnut Avenue, Plmming Division - 315 Maple Avenue and in the offices of the City Clerk 400 Grand Avenue. If you have any questions, please call Chadrick Smalley, Associate Plamler, at (650) 877-8535 and FAX 650/829-6639. (Sent out 365 envelopes) CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF HEARING I, Krista Mmiinelli-Larson, certify that I caused to be posted the notice of Public Hearing in the areas designated on February 29, 2008. That upon the instance of and for and on behalf of the City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco, California, your affiant posted: Courtesy Notice MILLER AVENUE PARKING STRUCTURE YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the City of South San Francisco City Council will discuss the following iteln on March 13, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive: DISCUSSION ITEM: Miller Avenue Parking Structure Negative Declaration Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure PROJECT Miller Avenue Parking Structure City of SSF Redevelopment Agency/applicant-owner Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040 through 012-312-070) The Miller Avenue Parking Structure is proposed to be a 4~ story public parking structure with up to 13,700 square feet of ground floor comlnercial space, to be located on the three existing surface parking lots on the south side of the 300 Block of Miller Avenue (APNs 012-312-040, 050 and 060) and the existing residential propeliies at 323 Miller Avenue (APN 012-312-070) in the Downtown COlnmercial (D-C) Zoning District. Copies of the Negative Declaration for the Miller Avenue Parking Structure are available for public review at the Orange Avenue Library - 804 W. Orange Avenue, the Grand Avenue Library - 306 Walnut Avenue, Planning Division - 315 Maple Avenue and in the offices of the City Clerk 400 Grand Avenue. If you have any questions, please call Chadrick Smalley, Associate Planner, at (650) 877- 8535 and FAX 650/829-6639. Said notices were posted at the following places, which are within the boundaries of the City of South San Francisco. 400 Grand Avenue - City Hall 33 Arroyo Drive - Municipal Services Building 315 Maple Avenue - City Hall Annex 840 West Orange A venue - Main Library 306 Walnut Avenue Grand Avenue Library That said posting was fully completed on the 29th Day of ~ruary and a copy of said Notice is attached hereto. / r - ~'t\\ s1N & o n >< U; t:1 C") Q 0 C4l1F!l~$'" Staff Report AGENDA ITEM # 10 DATE: March 12, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: (1) Review the CDBG Subcommittee's proposed CDBG nonprofit agency funding recommendations (2) hear agency petitions and (3) finalize funding recommendations. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this meeting is to: (1) Review the CDBG Subcommittee's proposed CDBG nonprofit agency funding recommendations (2) hear agency petitions and (3) finalize funding recommendations. The City received notification from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that it's Community Development Block Grant entitlement for fiscal year 2008-2009 is $594,766. This represents a cut of $21, 895 from 2007-2008. The City also anticipates having $70,000 in program income and $200,000 in carryover funds available for 2008-2009. Of the total $864,766 available for CDBG activities, the City can only use $99,715 to fund nonprofit agencies and $132,953 for administrative expenses. The balance must be used for housing, commercial or public facility activities. Other funds available or allocated by the CDBG Subcommittee include $l6,175 from HOME and $52,800 from RDA (see Exhibit A, Community Development Entitlement Grant Fund Availability) SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RECEIVED: There were three new public service requests this year and the majority of public services funded during the current fiscal year have requested continued funding. The combined category of housing, commercial and public facilities consists of the city- sponsored Housing Program, which administers housing development activities, acquisition and rehabilitation projects, minor home repair, and rehab loans to low-income homeowners; the city- sponsored Commercial Rehabilitation Program; CID Housing Access Program; and Rebuilding Together Peninsula. Staff Report Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program Page No 2 REDEVELOPMENT AND HOME FUNDS: Redevelopment Agency housing funds have historically been allocated for housing projects such as Safe Harbor ( emergency shelter), the transitional housing operations of Shelter Network, and the Human Investment Project's Home Share Program. These projects provide housing to homeless clients and persons or families at risk of becoming homeless. In fiscal year 2008-2009 these projects will be handled in the same manner by taking advantage of the CDBG allocation process to solicit and award grants. The County of San Mateo HOME Consortium provides yearly administration funds to the City from the HOME Program, based on a percentage of the County's federal HOME entitlement. In prior years, the City Council has targeted these funds to undertake fair housing activities that are required by federal legislation. This strategy enables the City to free up public service dollars, subject to federal spending limits, for non-legal activities. The HOME entitlement amount is $16,175. PRELIMINARY FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS CDBG SUBCOMMITTEE: The City Council's CDBG Subcommittee met to review all proposals, discuss program accomplishments and prioritize activities for funding. The CDBG Subcommittee is recommending the following allocations: Program City-Sponsored Child Care City-Sponsored Adult Day Care Second Harvest Food Bank Neighborhood Services Ctr. (NPNSC) Social Services Project READ - West Orange Library CORA (Ctr. for Domestic Violence Prevention) Shelter Rape Trauma Services Center PARCA John's Closet Youth Service Bureau (former Family Alternatives) The Tooth Mobile C.I.D. Housing Access Rebuilding Together Peninsula City-Sponsored Housing Programs City-Sponsored Commercial Neighborhood Services Ctr. (NPNSC) House Helpers First Time Homebuyer Loans CDBG Program Administration Project Sentinel - Fair Housing Program HIP Housing Shelter Network - Crossroads Shelter Network - Maple Street Amount Awarded $10,000 $18,249 $5,000 $24,000 $5,000 $5,000 $6,250 $5,000 $5,000 $6,200 $10,000 $15,000 $8,500 $272,130 $175,000 $40,500 $121,000 $132,953 $8,000 $10,000 $18,000 $7,500 Staff Report Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program Page No 3 Samaritan House - Safe Harbor Sitike Counseling Center $7,000 $10,300 To provide additional detail, staff has prepared a worksheet titled "Community Development Block Grant Progranl Summary of Funding Requests and Funding Recommendations for 2008- 2009". The worksheet is attached to this report as "Exhibit B" and provides a summary of projects, funding for each project for the last two fiscal years, funding requests for fiscal year 2008-2009 and a column Council Members used for recommendations. Exhibit C provides a summary of applicant budgets and beneficiary data. Organizations that requested CDBG funds but feel the need to petition their funding amount may make a brief presentation to Council at its March 12th meeting regarding their projects and City Council may take this opportunity to ask the agencies questions and provide feedback. A CDBG binder has been prepared for Council Members containing every proposal that was received and has been placed in the City Council office at City Hall. Additional materials or copies can be secured at the Office of Economic and Community Development upon request. CONCLUSION: The CDBG Subcommittee prepared the funding recommendations for City Council to review and finalize. The City Council will not formally adopt the CDBG budget and grant funding awards until the final public hearing scheduled for April 9, 2008. At that meeting, the City Council will take action and authorize submission of the Five Year Consolidated Plan for 2008-20l2 and the One Year Action Plan (2008-2009) to HUD by May 15, 2008. All funds allocated by City Council on April 9, 2008 will be incorporated into the City budget for fiscal year 2008-2009. 1'\ /1 I Jv/'-;/' ~ ' 1/.' By> {; r--- '-'-'\.J::/1/v'--1("vl_.__~ Marty Van Duyn, / Assistant City Manal er --"'----~ , Attachments: Exhibit "A" Community Development Entitlement Grant Fund Availability Exhibit "B" Community Development Block Grant Program Summary of Funding Requests and Funding Recommendations for 2008-2009 Exhibit "C" 2008-09 CDBG Applicant Budgets and Beneficiary Data MVD:NF:SOS:JEA 0') Q I co Q Q C'I.l :SO:: q:~ ~): O..,J ~~ I-C/) :c:Lt ~~ (!I co ~q: o::::! O~ ~q: I-C/) :c:0 UJ~ ~u.. 00 ..,J:c: ~q: UJC/) oUJ >- 0 . ~~ ~~ ~~ 0>- 00::' ~ . :s :::>- C/) . ~ - t- - OJ - J: >< W 1:: g'E .- a. -g.2 uQ.)_ c > Ul .- (J) -0 O~5 I I I E. a:: u.. .' .- ....-1-oo-i--. - iO-----:~o 1-- ------;::!~~I ~ ~. I ~' I~ '.....' al, 0)1 1 I cDi I- 0, I .~ 1.....1 co':E1 i,,*,i 001 ~I , fA-1 0..1 ~ ,Q lU .c Q) 0::: ~-c5-.o JOO._ (01---- 0101 (01 On! 0.' ~i 0' 0 ..fl t--IO! (01 I (h. N! CO, · (hI fA-, co ' CO ' t--.! '<t' 0)' LO, (hI , 1 . .,,!: I -~~-l----r---' 1 ~1~1~1 1 '''"1'0),01 ! O)~ C"Il~1 ~, 10)!cw,1cw,! i~'~: (Oi i l~i~1 I. ! '.' I I ..--.,----+-.-:--1--" 1 I- : '=-I (/)" 1(/):'" i.... ";;; II) 1 z 1 a. ' 0'''' 1 t .~ Q) :::l i-I' 0 I z l ~ I r::: I ~ ~ i 0: w'. Z, :::l <JQ) 1,.0 Q)::: I,. '~:::li . ...;:; E <J ~I. 0' ~ll ~ e'1,. ~ E ~I ' ulo::: Q...11n 0 !zi ~I Wi ~ Q)1't: U ~i W ! ~! ~ I O.~!'s oi -g I. ~ .....,' ..J 1;..'''0 r::: Q...I W .....>-i <Q)I '-' ..J 0::: 0:::1 I- (/)10::( II) Oc!l: I- C> 0:::, 0 <J E g.ci i= 0 <I 1-::::!IJ:r: ~ Z 0::: UI ,.Q l.;; I.....r::; W a. (!) I I;: 8', ~o ~ ,,'...... 1- 10;..-- (!) '-""'1 I...Q...Q) al ~i 81 .E I... :is o U" Q).E ~ o . 0 -I::::: ow .Q,-S! ~ WI- ~.Q ~ ::::: ~' ~ I-U ~'_'Q) o wi :s:'- w "")1 ~,~ <J "") 0' '-0' ~ r::: O 0.... ~ 0::: \t)~iU 0:::0. ~~ IXl a. C"Il , -----'------------- (/)' 01 zl :::l. ~. w ~ o :I: ..J <( I- o I- ' I (/) i 'e' IZ! :::l !~ II- IZ 'w '~ c. o ..Ji W > W o w 0::: ..J ~i 0' I- 0) o , co o (/) W U 0::: :::l o (/) ..J ..J <(I (/) o! Z :::l ~ ..J <( I- o I- lU '(3 .. Q) EI EI 0, 01 ClI e:: 'iii! 51 :I: I ..I 01 -, '0' Q) en ::J Q)I ,Q: ~i e: o e: lU <J en '0 e: ::J' -! .., Q)i >, 01 ~: :;! 0' ... : .... e: Q) E Q) ;:: ;: e:co Q)o 0) , o~ .0 COo ON - .. o m I ?fl.>- It) .....ftj e: <J o .!!! 't:I~ Q) E III 0 lU .. ,Q- en '0 .- Q) en- e: lU =ij .~ e:- ::J en - Q) ~c. (.) e: .~ 0 Q)O (/)0 0: .~ ~, :EfA- '::J en c. ::J ~c.. ii: en , ::J I- I Co I- e: Q) E Q) ;:; ;: e: Q) 0) o , CO o - o :~ '0 N e: o '0 Q) en lU ,Q .!!! e: o ;: lU .. - .!!! e: E '0 <( " " " o Z QJ Ol co D- OC) o o N ;::: ?; l: o (I):;:; ..Q (I) l'll ::::I...."C rn~l: In E (I) CO E E c 0 E UU8 (I) 0:: +-' "OUlm ... CU::s 0 ... I ::s 0' CO LLcuO a::: IJ "0 C ::s LL 1.---.------- I ~ o Cl CU I'; U >, +-' 'S;: :;:; c.> <( " C E > co o I ...... o "0 CU "0 ... lI:l 3: <C +-' Ul cu~ ::s I 0'..... CUO a::: 0:0:0:0 ~!g! : ~: LO-: : I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ! , , , , , , , , , I , , , , , , , , , , I , , I , I , , , --04___4-___'"'__ I , , g!g!g!~ 0'0'0'1() ....1 ..I ...t .. ~!""'!~l~ , , , , , , , , , ---4--...+--......__ , , , 0'01 II I 0:0: : 0'0' , -! -I f ~!<D! ! , , , , , , f I I , , , , , I , , , , , , I , , , , , __..J.___J.___t..__ , , , gIg! '; I OJ 0_: : -:t'I'-' , N: ~ : , , , , , , , , , I , , , , , , , , , , , I , , __..J___.t___f...__ I I I , , , , , , ! , , , , , , , , ~i : ! Uf I I "::;: : : L...r J f ~! : ; _I I I .~i : E: g; :~; (f) : : 0>: I I J O. I 01 ~: 0::: TI: (.I): ro~.....,l co: Z:..Ci: c:~: 0..',-' co, - , z:--':c;::J: ..........: (!): I-(!):O: -IO)j ,-, J:::p CI "'0' COi u! ~ ~ 0: ~: (/):0: =O:....J: ~:.....,: c:~: ._, (/), CUI WI C:g:....J:-g: (!),>, II CO' (I): '~Q):U5: -olD: c:-: 0' 1+:i'()1 0:<(: C:~: .e,u.J'(!)'U' 010::1 (/)1 cu: -n:.....:...,:CL: .el~:~: C: ,2>: '0': 'cr: .~ : Q.), ~ I '-I (/) I 210..10..:<(: ,I ,I .1 .1 ,"":N:('t'):~: I I I I , I : : - m : I- - m - J: >< W 0, 8:8:01010 8 OlN: :8: N l(") ! CD ! i 0: N 1 I I r-' t f I ! 1 I I f I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I J I I I I I f I I I I I I I I f ! I J I I I I I I I I I I I I f i I I I I I I I I I I --1---j---t---j-- ---rit);~ g!g!g!g!g g 1~:1() 0'0'0'0'0 0 l~:~ It)''': 0: 0: ~: ..rj' ~ : m: ~ :~:Lt'):~: CO l l~ I I I I I I I I I f I I I Iff , I I _.--I---.wf---..-__v.__ . ~".. 1:"....... Iff f I (j) 0' 0)10 8i8i8i8! 80>0:0>:0 o , 0 , N , lC), , I'- <D_ co.: -:t_: ~. M:ro:~:O: I'N~-I~o "-I~:"- "": : ~~: ~, :~: I j I , t I I I I , t I , , , " 'I " I I I t I I I 1 I I I ! ! J I I I I I 1 I I I I I I , I I t I I 1 I I I --~___~___k___L__ __J~_*l~~* I ! I I or- 1Cf)IN OIOf~IOIO T""" C'i) :m:M 010:("0:0:0 ("0 -:t '-:t'0> 0_1 0_: N..: OJ 1'-_ 0> N ! t--"": ..,r lC)IOI-:tI-:t:C"0 <D <D '0,lC) :T-:~:~~N CD T- :T"""; I : : :: I :: I J I I ] " I I I j I" I I , I I I I I I I I I __J___l___l___L__ __ ___ :___~___ : : : : :C6:Q):Io.:C::(/) t I I I t........I(JI~IOI"O I ! f I f 01--, """~l C I J J I '~'C:'>-"lrol::::J: : : : : : : : "..: U:4- , ! , , , .0 , ,~ . .:::.:' o. (!) : : : : :::J : V-# : .c:: =: - I '-""'1 I I I Cf) I (J I ....., <C I 1a I(/)I I I : :::: ~ (l):~ ! ~! i 1 I I .Q , Q..' U' ro I .- If! : :::s.: Q..:'S: > :15:; I 'c..' 'L' ro lei I I lICO'Q)1 IL-l I : :-:;:.....:(f.):-Oc I Q.)l I I I '''10, 1 : .:t= :: :: (5: c:.~: CO :<(:: : :t-:"'O::o:oo :~:: :; .-: ::J:<l> 1.- ! I I I "1j I Q..., :J :E:: :: :<<i:L-:~ lCOl I :: :.c:~:~ : LL i ~ I I I.....' I C i "- Iii I I I Q) I :(1):: I I,enl-Ia.> 1 E: 1 ::: .~: -g: <V 1'-1 I I I '(.)'::=11= : g! ! 1'-: : :;:~: (l) I I I :2: ; :0):<(:..0 1:J1 I lei t I I 10) !~!..o: :Q): ~ : ftJ:c:u ~ 0 " ',E', :J',C :::;:~:a>: : I IOfOI~ :CD:():::6:~: : :~: E:<u ........:m:lQ:o:::]: : :.....:<(:~ (]):.~ : ,:: : 2:::!::: : : : 1:: : 0 ~:c::(9l.c:~: I ,:1, I -I (l)1'1J1........, f i '0: : 0' (/)' c' 0' 0)' , E' , (/): : ro: 0: ro: :, ....,,' :, - '.e' 'I-' C' - c:........: U>: : OJ:: : ..c: 6; ~: ~: ~:: : ~:>-:ca:r-::.::i:: : ,I .1 .1 ,I .1 I , T""":NiMi",":lO:: : t I I I t i . l : ! : :: I T'" ci 2 (!) 0) CO 0.. a::> o o N -- <D -- ("0 .Q :::l U) Cl OJ C U c o (I):;:; (I) n:l ....."C ~ 1: E (I) E E o E u 8 (I) rx: ... "C:gcn 1::...0 ... 1 :::I 0'" 00 U.CIl0 0::: 00 Iltn~ "C"C I:: CIl :::I"C U. ... ra s: <e ... tn "C CIl 000 I:: :::I 1 :::l 0'"..... U.CIl0 0::: 1- --- ------ I C:- o If ... t) <e c c ~ ~ ) ) 1 . - OJ : I- - OJ - :x: >< w 010,0,0,010 ~i~18i 1~i8 cO: N: U)-: l ci: ~ i~:~~ :~:~ I t I I I I I I I I I I i I I i I t I I I t I I I I I 1 . f I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I: 1 l I i I I I I I i I t I I I I I I I I ! I I J I I I I I lit I I --~___4___~___~__~___~___ I I lit I g!g!gigig!~lg IO'IO'....'O'O'MIO ~l ...i ...i ...1 ....1 ...! ... ~iOOi~!~:~i~l~ i :N:,,*,: : :~ f t I 1 I I --~-- -+--- ....-__~n__.o{___~ _"._ j I I I I ! 0'0'0'0' ""0'0 0 0:0:("):0: :0:0 (") 0.: ~: T-_l 0_: : 0.: o. (D. ~:ooi~:~! !~:f6 8 : :('f):~: : :~ ~ j , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I t I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I --~___~___~___~__J___~___ f I: I I I I 8i8ig18! '!gig g ~: LOJ ~J 0_: : OJ 0_ CD_ LO:COlN:LO: :0:0 0 T-l 1~'J'--..1 \"q"fL{) 0 : :(V)~T-~ : :~ l"- i 1 t I I I I I I I I I ~ I I Ii! I I I I I I i I i I < I t __~___k___~___~__~___~___ __ __~__ I I I I: I I ! en I Q) I : : ~ l : : : c : :.ci ~ : : : i : : : 0: Ctd ! ! i i !~! i~!~!(1) : i:! !~! !;S;<(;:O : : i : :m: i<e=:c:Jg ; : : : : I: : :::J: co ~::: :m: :c..i:~liU ! l!! !~: :&:!..<J~ I I 1 I 101 If..........: C ::; ~ II: :.ci::co , I It! I 1:::S f I : : : : :u: lo.: : i :(/): i~i(J): :~: ! ; : E: : ~:Z: :.: : , CO' CO, "0" Q.., 'E ' , :-: 0,: : ~~Z: : E: : I :J J 0 I _ I 0..., -, (j) If: ! ~ i '- ~ ,~i C! ~: 53: O! I , '-, Q.., 0, .Q, U, 0 , U , : : a3: r.:n: (jj: CO: (f): --l: c.ii~ : ~: Q..: .~: E: ~: (]): '- : r:: : : Q): L..: (/): E: .0: ,S:?: ~:.Ci) : I 00, (1), :::10, 0' ..ern, ":>':::1'"" : '.ei 1 ~ 1L1..o1"'f I <t::....-:I:U:(]):(1):(1):O: : ~: ~:~:~:~:~:E:~: : C'O'(1)'(1)'....'"Q'O'-, , 'w I f- I ~: L-: 2 to' I: n:s I : :J: ! g: 51:Q.i! O! :0: : 0: g': c: c: ..c: f: i Q) ~ to- : : I':.;::;I~I~'(f),O,E, , , I "-' I lo..L.l """",-t l ..0 1'- I I I O:3:(f):~:<:~:~: : : ,J I I! 11 D:::'t 0) -1-11 I J ~:~:q:g;O:.ID:~i : l U:~:U:U:U:Z:~: : : , ill I I I l J ~:N:~:~:~:0:~: : : 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I! I f I : : ~ : ~ ~ l : tn .cCll"C :::l CIl C UJ=CIl .- E C) E E CO E 0 00t) UUCIl 0::: ... tn "C CIl 000 I:: :::l 1 :::l 0'"..... U-CIl0 0::: , , , , , , , , , , , ~__L.__ , , , , , , , , , I ] ! I 1 __~...__L__ E :~: tn ra:.c:"C ....~n11 r: 8'i=! ~ ,...,~, CIl iOoi<e::c 'W'.oJ,ra :~: 1:::: :0: 5: ~ !::r: ~ E! fa :~:<e:'C E '.oJ' ,I:: : 0: : fa ~"...., ,... en: i : ~ 2, 1 ::::l Q.. : : : 0): : : ,~: : : ~! ! ! 0' I 1 I: : ,=: : Q) co' : .c u. i : CIl I I f (.) Qi: I:: 1::: ~ ~: :~ a3: : ~ (/): 10 ~l , o ' , Q) : : '--.1 1 01 , ...., , CL: : , I , , , : 0,0,0 ~ig!g I'--!I'--i~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 I 1 I I --~---~---~--~--- ~ I , I giglgigig 10'0'10'0'0 ...1 ...~ ...1 ...1 ... ~l~!I'-!l'-i~ I 1 I I t I I I I t I I -- -". ---~.- --1---4,--- I I I I '0'0' '0 0 ~O:O: ~OO I : 0...: LO~: I: C'0_ co }~:t-: ;~ ~ I I I i , I I I i I t I tit ) ~ I I J I I I I I I 1 J I t I I t t I I __~___L___~__~___ , I 1 I 8l8i8!8i88 co.: OJ LO_: OJ O. (") 1'--1 co1 1'--: 1'--:0 0 N: ~: : l N ro , I I I I I I I I I . I I I , 1 I I I I I I ! I I J 1 I --1---t---:---t-- t tJJ l ....;.. Q) ~ <n- I I I 1 :"C:"'::c:"O ~ : : : : c:: ~: ~r 5 : : : : :::s: fI>: 'm \4- : ~ : : ,U-t._,> CD : : : l :c:;;<(:o : : : : :Q):~c~ : : : i 'Elc.:~ ro : I : : : Q.; c.: OE: ~ ; : : : 101 cat : : : : :Q):O:<(:-g : : : : t ~ I C' : co i i : : :-C:-C: :00 1 I I I 1(1).-_, lID : : : : : a::: : -c: ::J i : : : t _ I....' 10- I I 1'-1 :ns:n:s::~ :C/):CiJ:.,g: :'0:=: I :"'O:~:~: It-lf/)I 53 !e!U5!~I....~ ~.~~ ~ l (1.)1 (1), (1), <D. I 1::' <D : (/): a..: 10: C: I (1)' ..0 ~ E?: ro~ 00: 0>: : r:n: Q) :U~~: IlO: : res: (,) ~ ': I: (l) l 0>: : E: C l..:x::t..x=l WI Cl : 0: I ~ I "- I '- I :J 1 ~ , I... I 1 t1\ :0:0:0:0>: :'4-: :~ 0')1 ~ 1 ~ I :c I (/) I ....., 1'_ CI.G1-C1 'ei'S::' :0 .-: Q): Q.): C: :J: :::s : ~:Z:Z:E;O: '0' 0: <D; Q>: 'L:: () : : E: I:==:~:ro:(]): :<C: CL:<D:Q):E:~: I I - i ..c I ..c I OJ I .- I : : I: (/)1 (/):(/);(/): : : 1 I I I I I I ~:N;r0:~:Lri: : : i I I I I I ~ l I I t I l : ~: 'I co o o N -... ~ (") o o o LO 0: CO: 1-: . ..... '" r....... 0: O' co: 6: -.;r: , , , , , , 0:0 0,0 CO : LO_ -, Ol 0'(") ""'; I N o Z <D OJ CO Q.. >- e::: <( :2: ~ :J CJ) Cl Z :J U- rn o I CO o co----- o 1Il~ "CO c:"C .:::l .g U- ... l'I:I ~ C:- O en oS l'I:I () ~ .:;: :;:; C) <( - - !.D - ..... III - J: >< W .... 'OI:t m o CO CO ~ :E O(jj ro .2 (/) (/) Q) (/) (/) ro .8 -0 C ro ...... () Q) "0 '- n. -0 Q) -0 C ::l - :>. ~ 00 o~ ro Q) .0 m o I CO o V) lJJ () e::: ::> o V) ..J ..J <C V) C Z ::> u.. ..J ~ o I- O~ (/) ~ +-' ro .c ...... ~ ::l (/) oS: .8 ~ Q) 0:;; Q) '- '- <l) "0 C ::l (/) C") o z <l) OJ CO a.. co o o N -- se C") :a lJ) '<:t <( '<:t <( .S: I'- Z "I Z iii -- ::t "'iii t- o 0 ::s "0 0 .s::: ::s 0 - Q) cD Q) "0 U c=: 0 Ul .;; :e- Q) 0 ::s :a N 0 - V) ..5 - :J: ~ 0 <0 0 l!) Q) 0) <0 <D 25 "I Ul 25 ~ l- E - 0 '<:t LL C rD ~ 25 0 V) .!!! 0 - U V) 0 ~ m ..5 U 0 N - J: .... Ul ~ ~ eft. ~ >< - 0 Q) 0 0 0 - C - .;:: 0 0 0 '<:t W 0 ltI "0 c::i -.i c::i co ~ .... Q) ltI 0 co 0 0 C> Ul "'iii ~ ::s V) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 u 1ii >- C> 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 Q) Cl..c c::i ..n ......: <..ci .~ "0 "0 III ~ o ::s .- Cl I'- C") l!) l!) 0 a:lll[U 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 LL 0 0 0 0 V) III a- u? '<:t- o- "I- V) Cl ~ ~ l!) I'- U "I 1ii 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 "0 Cl 0_ C") '<:t 0_0 Q) "0 0 '<:t- -.i' '<:t - lJ) ::s "'iii <0 ~ NO 0 III - 0) 0.._ 0 0 u I- .... Q) D- '0' .... (17- (17- D- eft. ~ ~ - lJ) 0 0 >- - 0 0 0 c: u Q) Q) -.i ......: c::i Q) lii~o .;:: u ltI '<:t co '<:t .... Cl::S- "'iii Q) D- <(Ill V) l!) C") '<:t '<:t C") C") >- - 0) a5 "'iii u Q) 0 ~ - c: Cl l!) 0 Q)"O 1'-- I- Cl::S <(Ill (17- (17- .2;- G >. m 0 u.. u.. a5 Cf) Cf) > Cf) Cf) <( a5 a5 (]) > > c:: 0) <( <( c:: ro :::: 0 -0 -0 en 0 0 c:: c:: :::> u ~ ro ro (\j Cf) ~ (5 (5 -l 0) 0 C; "I l!) 0 C; "I <0 CD 0 l!) "I ~ I- '<:t '<:t en (]) > ~ c:: ..... 2 <( ~ c: "E en ro E ro u.. ~ c:: (]) Cii I- m ...: E c U -0 .E "[5 0 ci (J) <5 Q5 Q5 ~ Z =0 (J) (]) c:: Q5 :::> c: (J) E Q) u ;;; ro ro (]) Q) E :a Cl "S; (]) -l -0 (]) 0 u 0 co co Q5 S c:: :; u -<= ro ~ :m <( 0 Q) D- Cf) Ci5 ~ CD 0) -0 a::: co -0 0 c:: ..... U5 Q) ~ c:: (]) 2 0 0 ~ u .Q u "en <5 0 <+= en "S; :::> Ci5 (]) "(3 0 :::> en ~ Cii 0 c:: ..c:: Cf) (\j U I OOCf) se 1:) Cl... Cf) a. (J) ..c:: ci '1'1~ tV) (]) c:: -c:: ro "S -' 0 "en ..c:: :E' ~o "05 0: 0 0 <( -, >- 0 00 z cv:i N cv:i -.i N .....: N cv:i -.i..n <..ci n; :::I +-' U :s: _u1il>-c> o Q) C)..c '~"O "'0 IX! ote 0 :::I .- 0 C::aJ~U 1: ~ 1i) Q)cC) UQ)"O :DC):::I a.<(aJ .= r-- "00 Q)cD ~o Q)C CJ)N :0 I/) On; .s:::. :::I Q)"'O I/) :~ :::1"'0 ~.5 C"') 00 00 CO :g;~e2!;!2 ....000 ...- Q) Eu.. oU) UCJ) .5 1/)0) +-' 0 ccb .!!! (;) u~ g~o;~ coo 0 i:?5 '<:t CO -- o la ?f!.c, ... I/) .E Q) "'0 'li; Q)"iij ~CJ) ~~6~ 0001'- ...- ...- ...- cf2.?fi.?f!.cJ2. 00 ~ 0 o~oo cv) o-.i u..C> CJ)IX! U)O U 00 00 00 1'-- L{)- +-' Q) -g.g> ~~J9 c.. +-' 0 e~1- a..0' ... a. ::g~~~M OO'<:tL{)N 0- en- ci ci co- en en 0 CO CO '<:t C"') 0 en C"') c:0 (17 (17(17 I/) Q) .... .~ .E (t\ "iij CJ) ~::R~~ ~~LhCn '<:t '<:t '<:t CO Cii +-' o I- i:)'1il C C) Q)"'O 0):::1 <(IX! I'- 0 ~ipX; L{) en- C"')C"')C"')coen ...-C"')C"')NOO ~ <.D <.D L{)- Q) +-' i:i5 Q) U .~ Q) CJ) l.L.l.L. (/)(/) (/) of Q) c75 Q) <..:> :;) 5- (/) CO o C"') en ""Cl cu e en en o '- U Q5 0 ~f;j w:c ~~ c..ro ~(/) Q) en :;) o :r: c .rg .~ E ..c ..c ro (/)(/)(/) ~ ~$ IDID Ncv)-.i..n - - ~ - I- - al - :I: >< W 2 ro :;) 0- ""Cl C N Q) :5 (17 ..c :;) e :5 ""Cl 2 <..:> ~ o <..:> c Q) Q) .n c o Q) > ro ..c 00 o ~ o 2 c Q) (.) '- .E en CD .n E :;) c ro :5 t5 .E Q) :5 B Q) :;) "0 ""Cl Q) en :;) I'- o cD o E g en CD .n E :;) :z N c:i z Q) Cl ell a.. 00 o o ~ !f2 C"') .s C5 en c :;) o (.) Q) -"" = en