HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28-25 BPAC Special Meeting Agenda PacketBicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
City of South San Francisco
Special Meeting Agenda
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall,
400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
Darryl Yip, Chair
Dylan Hingey, Vice-Chair
Arian Guzman, Committee Member
Philip Hollenback, Committee Member
Frank McAuley, Committee Member
Carlos Moreno, Committee Member
VACANT, Committee Member
ANNEX Conference Room
315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA
6:00 PMTuesday, January 28, 2025
How to submit written Public Comment before the Meeting:
Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting
by emailing [email protected]
How to provide Public Comment during the Meeting:
COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER
Under the Public Comment section of the agenda, members of the public may speak on any item not listed on the
Agenda. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the
agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The Chair may direct staff to investigate
and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting. If there appears to be a large number of
speakers, the Chair may reduce speaking time to limit the total amount of time for public comments (Gov. Code
sec. 54954.3(b)(1).).
American Disability Act:
The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand
Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at [email protected]. Include your name, address, phone
number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least
24-hours before the meeting.
Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or
accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the
Office of the City Clerk by email at [email protected], 24-hours before the meeting.
Page 1 City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025
1
January 28, 2025Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
Special Meeting Agenda
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
ITEMS FROM STAFF MEMBERS
1. Staff Update on the Proposed In-N-Out Burger Restaurant at 932 and 972 El
Camino Real (Adena Friedman, Chief Planner)
2. Staff Update on the Grant Application for SafeTREC's 2025 Complete Streets
Safety Assessments and Safe Speed Limits Assessments (Megan Wooley-Ousdahl,
Principal Planner)
3. 2024 Collision Statistics - 4th Quarter Report (Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Principal
Planner)
PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes for December 4, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
5. Complete Streets Checklist Review for the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission’s Complete Streets Active Transportation Technical Assistance Round 2
Program Grant Application - Checklist #1: City of South San Francisco; and
Checklist #2: Town of Colma (Audriana Hossfeld, Senior Civil Engineer, City of
South San Francisco, and Abdulkader Hashem, Principal Project Manager, Town of
Colma)
ITEMS FROM BOARD MEMBERS, COMMISSIONERS, COMMITTEE MEMBERS
ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025
2
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:25-67 Agenda Date:1/28/2025
Version:1 Item #:
1.Staff Update on the Proposed In-N-Out Burger Restaurant at 932 and 972 El Camino Real (Adena
Friedman, Chief Planner)
City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™3
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:25-68 Agenda Date:1/28/2025
Version:1 Item #:
2. Staff Update on the Grant Application for SafeTREC's 2025 Complete Streets Safety Assessments and Safe
Speed Limits Assessments (Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Principal Planner)
City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™4
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:25-70 Agenda Date:1/28/2025
Version:1 Item #:
3. 2024 Collision Statistics - 4th Quarter Report (Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Principal Planner)
City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™5
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
DATE: January 9, 2025
TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Councilmembers
South San Francisco Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
FROM: Sergeant James Portolan, Traffic Supervisor
SUBJECT: Vehicle versus Pedestrian and Bicyclist Collision Information – 4th Quarter of 2024
Overview
This report provides an overview of vehicle versus pedestrian, bicyclist, e-bicyclist and e-scooterist
collisions that occurred in South San Francisco during the 4th quarter of 2024. The information provided
includes the date, time, location, and causes of the collisions. The causes are determined by factors
outlined in the California Vehicle Code.
There was a total of fourteen (14) collisions resulting in ten (10) minor injuries, and four (4) major injuries.
The collisions involved nine (9) pedestrians, two (2) bicyclist, one (1) e-bicyclist, and two (2) e-scooterist.
In 57% of these collisions the driver of the vehicle was found to be at fault for the primary collision factor.
In 2023, there was a total of 45 vehicle versus pedestrian, bicyclist, e-bicyclist and e-scooterist collisions.
In 2024, there were a total of 38 collisions which represents 16% reduction.
10-2-2024/ Vehicle vs. e-scooterist/ Junipero Serra Bl @ Arroyo Dr/ Case #24-4805
At approximately 3:37 PM, a vehicle stopped at a stop sign on Arroyo Drive waiting to make a left turn
onto Junipero Serra Boulevard. An e-scooterist was traveling south in the southbound bicycle lane on
Junipero Serra Boulevard approaching Arroyo Drive. The vehicle entered the intersection to negotiate a
left turn when the e-scooterist made two unsafe lane changes across the southbound lanes and failed stop
at a posted stop sign to make a left onto Arroyo Drive sideswiping the front of the vehicle. The e-scooterist
sustained a minor injury and was transported to a local trauma center.
The e-scooterist was at fault for this collision for operating a motorized scooter on a highway with a speed
limit of more than 25 mph, in addition to unsafe turning movements and failing to stop for a posted stop
sign. The weather was clear.
10-10-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ Grand Av @ Maple Av/ Case #24-4943
At approximately 4:21 PM, a pedestrian was crossing Grand Avenue at Maple Avenue in a marked
crosswalk. A vehicle was traveling westbound on Grand Avenue, attempted a left turn onto Maple Avenue
and struck the pedestrian. The pedestrian sustained a minor injury and was transported to a local trauma
center.
6
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for the collision for failing to yield the right of way to a
pedestrian in the crosswalk. The weather was clear.
10-19-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ Arroyo Dr @ El Camino Real/ Case #24-5075
At approximately 8:01 AM, a pedestrian was walking northbound on El Camino Real crossing Arroyo
Drive in a marked crosswalk. A vehicle was traveling eastbound on Arroyo Drive, attempted a right turn
onto southbound El Camino Real and struck the pedestrian. The pedestrian sustained a minor injury and
was transported to a local trauma center.
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for the collision for failing to yield the right of way to a
pedestrian in the crosswalk. The weather was clear.
10-26-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ El Camino Real @ Ponderosa Rd/ Case #24-5188
At approximately 7:39 AM, a pedestrian was walking eastbound on Ponderosa Road crossing El Camino
Real in a marked crosswalk. A vehicle was traveling eastbound on Ponderosa Road negotiating a right
turn onto southbound El Camino Real and struck the pedestrian. The driver fled the scene. The pedestrian
sustained minor injuries but declined any medical treatment.
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for the collision for failing to yield the right of way to the
pedestrian in the crosswalk. The weather was clear.
10-30-2024/ Vehicle vs. Bicyclist/ Grand Av @ Maple Av/ Case #24-5235
At approximately 1058 AM, a bicyclist was traveling eastbound on the 300 block of Grand Avenue. A
vehicle was traveling eastbound on Grand Avenue, negotiated a right-hand turn into a parking stall and
struck the bicyclist. The bicyclist sustained a minor injury and was treated on scene by SSFFD
Paramedics but declined any further medical treatment.
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for the collision for making an unsafe turning movement. The
weather was clear.
10-31-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ So. Airport Bl @ Gateway Bl/ Case #24-5263
At approximately 5:19 PM, a pedestrian was running through a marked crosswalk at So. Airport Boulevard
and Gateway Boulevard. A vehicle was traveling southbound on Gateway Boulevard, attempted to
negotiate a right turn onto So. Airport Boulevard and struck the pedestrian in the crosswalk. The
pedestrian sustained major injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for the collision for not yielding to a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
The weather was clear and dry.
11-14-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ So. Airport Bl @ Wondercolor Ln/ Case #24-5487
At approximately 10:16 PM, a vehicle was traveling northbound on So. Airport Boulevard at the speed
limit. A pedestrian unexpectedly darted across the street outside of any crosswalk and was struck by the
vehicle. The pedestrian sustained minor injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
7
The pedestrian was found at fault for crossing the roadways between two controlled intersections. The
weather was clear.
11-20-24/ Vehicle vs. e-bicyclist/ El Campo Dr @ Del Monte Av/ Case #24-5587
At approximately 4:54 PM, an e-bicyclist was traveling westbound on the 100 block of El Campo Drive.
A vehicle exited a private driveway and negotiated a left turn onto eastbound El Campo Drive sideswiping
the e-bicyclist. The e-bicyclist sustained minor injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The driver of the vehicle was found at fault for not yielding the ride of way to another vehicle already in
the roadway. The weather was raining.
11-24-2024/ Vehicle vs. e-scooterist/ W. Orange Av @ El Camino Rl/ Case #24-5626
At approximately 11:59 AM, a vehicle was traveling out from a gas station waiting to make a left turn
onto W. Orange Avenue. An e-scooterist was traveling westbound on the sidewalk of W. Orange Avenue
toward El Camino Real at an unsafe speed and broadsided the stopped vehicle. The e-scooterist sustained
minor injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The e-scooterist was found at fault for operating an e-scooter on the sidewalk (21235(g) CVC). The
weather was clear.
11-26-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ Gellert Bl @ Appian Wy/ Case #24-5651
At approximately 9:10 PM, a pedestrian was running northbound on Gellert Boulevard at Appian Way
within a marked crosswalk. A vehicle was negotiating a left turn onto Appian Way and struck the
pedestrian. The pedestrian sustained minor injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The driver of the vehicle was found to be at fault for the collision for failing to yield to a pedestrian in a
crosswalk. The weather was clear.
11-27-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ McLellan Dr @ Mission Rd/ Case #24-5658
At approximately 9:32 AM, a pedestrian was running northbound in the western crosswalk towards Trader
Joe’s Market against a red light. A vehicle entered the intersection on a green signal light and struck the
pedestrian. The pedestrian sustained major injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The pedestrian was found at fault for the collision leaving the safety of the sidewalk and running into the
path of a vehicle so close to constitute an immediate hazard. The weather was clear.
12-12-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ El Camino Rl @ Country Club Dr/ Case #24-5882
At approximately 6:25 AM, a pedestrian was crossing El Camino Real from Country Club Drive in a
marked crosswalk. A vehicle was negotiating a right turn from Country Club Drive onto El Camino real.
The vehicle struck the pedestrian. The pedestrian sustained major injuries and was transported to a local
trauma center.
8
Due to conflicting statements and no witnesses, the party at fault was unable to be determined. The
weather was cloudy.
12-17-2024/ Vehicle vs. Pedestrian/ Callan Bl @ Westborough Bl/ Case #24-5960
At approximately 3:28 hours, a pedestrian was crossing the northern crosswalk of Callan Boulevard at
Westborough Boulevard. An unknown vehicle was negotiating a right turn from Westborough Boulevard
onto Callan Boulevard and struck the pedestrian. The driver fled the scene. The pedestrian sustained
minor injuries and declined medical attention.
The driver was at fault for this collision for not yielding to a pedestrian in the crosswalk. The weather
was clear.
12-29-2024/ Vehicle vs. Bicyclist/ Avalon Dr @ Junipero Serra Bl/ Case #24-6131
At approximately 8:38 PM, a vehicle was traveling northbound on Junipero Serra Boulevard through the
intersection of Avalon Dive on a green signal light. A bicyclist was traveling eastbound on Avalon Drive
through the intersection of Junipero Serra Boulevard against a red light and collided with the vehicle. The
bicyclist had major injuries and was transported to a local trauma center.
The bicyclist was found to be at fault for this collision for running a red light. The weather was clear.
No external factors were identified in the above-listed collisions.
Education and Enforcement
The South San Francisco Police Department continues to conduct enforcement and provide education to
the community to reduce traffic collisions. Enforcement actions include:
• The C.A.R.E. program which directs officers to enforce specified violations in complaint areas.
• Office of Traffic Safety Enforcement operations focusing on speeding, distracted driving, bicycle
and pedestrian safety, and seatbelt violations.
• DUI saturation patrols and DUI checkpoints
• San Mateo County Saturated Traffic Enforcement Program operations focusing on identified
traffic issues in each city.
• Daily enforcement by our patrol and traffic divisions as they patrol the city.
Education efforts include the community academies, the “Choose your ride” don’t drink and drive
campaign, bicycle safety through Every Kid Deserves a Bike program, and various social media
campaigns throughout year.
Citation Statistics
At the request of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, citation statistics for safety related
violations from the third quarter of 2024 are included in this report.
9
Speeding 14 Citations
Stop Sign 51 Citations
Distracted Driving 39 Citations
Red Light 19 Citations
Fail to Yield to Pedestrians 1 Citations
DUI 39 Arrests
Unlicensed Driver 64 Citations
Suspended Driver’s License 16 Citations
Bicycling/Scooter Under the Influence 1 Citation
10
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:25-71 Agenda Date:1/28/2025
Version:1 Item #:
4. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes for December 4, 2024
City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™11
Regular Meeting Minutes for Wednesday, December 4, 2024
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
City of South San Francisco, California
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Present: Darryl Yip, Chair
Dylan Hingey, Vice Chair
Arian Guzman
Philip Hollenback
Frank McAuley
Carlos Moreno
Absent: None
STAFF PRESENT:
Planning: Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Secretary to BPAC
Cynthia Fregoso, Clerk
PROCEEDINGS:
Call to Order / Roll Call: Chair Yip at 6:00pm
Agenda Review: No comments
Items from Staff Members: Canceling January meeting since it falls on January 1, 2025. Next meeting will
be February 5, 2025.
City staff is working to schedule a presentation from the Grand Boulevard
Initiative from the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.
We currently have one vacancy available for the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC). Please encourage your neighbors and friends to
apply.
Public Comment: None
CONSENT CALENDAR - Voting Key: (yes, no, abstain)
1. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes for November 6, 2024
Approved by BPAC 6-0-0: Committee Member McAuley motioned, Committee Member Guzman
seconded.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
2. Collision Statistics – 3rd Quarter Report (Sergeant Jim Portolan, Police Department)
12
Committee comments regarding the collision statistics:
o Committee Member Guzman said there was a 20% decrease in collisions from the last
quarter.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that there were two pedestrian collisions during this quarter. He
shared that there have been three in the 4th Quarter. There were no e-bicyclists and no
scooter injuries.
o Committee Member McAuley shared that he was surprised that most of the collisions were
on the side streets like Baden and Maple and didn’t think any of them were on a major
highway. There was a collision on Eccles at 11:00pm.
o Committee Member Guzman asked if anything new was implemented to reflect the
decrease in collisions.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that the City has built new bicycle lanes; for example, on Grand
Avenue. In reviewing the collision data, there is no locational pattern to where the collisions
are occurring, i.e., no specific intersection.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl asked if this is a trend that is seen with collisions in the third
quarter because of the longer days with more daylight.
Committee comments regarding the daylighting of intersections:
o Committee Member Guzman asked when the enforcement of daylighting of intersections
will begin.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that enforcement begins January 1st, and the City has been
sharing flyers and other information with the community, and will continue to do so. As
background, he shared that “daylighting intersections” means there is a No Parking red
zone located 20 feet from the crosswalk. This helps drivers have a clearer line of sight of
pedestrians at the corner; this gives drivers five to six seconds to see someone standing at
the crosswalk or a bicyclist trying to cross. After the City of San Francisco implemented this
practice, the Governor’s office signed this into law, and this was implemented in January
2024 and will be enforceable January 2025.
o Committee Member McAuley asked if there is a plan to paint the curb red for the 20 feet.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that the City is considering which locations will be painted with a
red curb. He noted that, per the State legislation, an intersection does not have to have a
sign or red curb to be enforceable.
o Committee Member Guzman asked if warnings will be issued first then citations. Sergeant
Portolan said there will be warnings first, and then there may likely be citations. The City is
sharing this information via social media, mailers, and through other avenues.
o Chair Yip asked if they were doing any business outreach. Sergeant Portolan shared that
flyers and other information is being shared with the downtown business owners and other
businesses.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl shared that this is a proven intervention to reduce collisions.
Committee comments regarding the collision statistics:
o Committee Member Moreno thanked Sergeant Portolan for his time and for coming. He
saw there were 24 DUI’s and asked if this is normal and if this is from a designated area
where people are driving through. Sergeant Portolan shared that there was a DUI
checkpoint where each vehicle gets screened.
o Committee Member Moreno asked if 24 is average, low, or high for a quarter. Sergeant
Portolan shared that it is average.
13
o Chair Yip asked if the suspended driver’s license was from the same checkpoint. Sergeant
Portolan said yes. Chair Yip asked if unlicensed drivers were from the same checkpoint.
Sergeant Portolan shared that some of them were.
o Committee Member Moreno asked about bike lanes on Grand Avenue and if there’s
citations or some sort of enforcement or warning for drivers that are parked in these lanes.
Committee comments regarding parking enforcement:
o Sergeant Portolan stated that it would be a citation and discussed the City’s new parking
company named LAZ.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl asked if LAZ will be ticketing the drivers who park in the
daylighted areas or giving warnings.
o Committee Member Guzman asked if they can still use Engage SSF regarding parking
concerns. Sergeant Portolan shared that the community can still use See Click Fix or call
the Police Department and they will transfer you to LAZ; community members can also call
LAZ directly.
o Chair Yip asked what their hours are and if they have beats. Are they going all over the City
or are they concentrating mostly in the downtown areas?
o Sergeant Portolan shared that LAZ does not have beats; however, they are initially focusing
on areas with the highest number of City-maintained parking spaces.
o Committee Member Moreno asked if there was a quota. Sergeant Portolan shared that
there is no quota.
o Chair Yip asked if someone could analyze the Engage SSF comments on parking
enforcement and target those areas, so people don’t park illegally. He notes that he has
submitted comments regarding the street across from the MSB where cars and trucks park
on the sidewalk and crosswalk.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that LAZ would respond if they were blocking the sidewalk and
issue a citation.
o Committee Member Hingey asked if LAZ gets compensated per citation or would they pick
up on an area that is a problem even if they were asked to focus on another area.
o Sergeant Portolan shared that the Police Department is in regular communication with LAZ.
Together, they will look at all the areas the complaints came from and the units will be
informed on what areas they need to focus and concentrate on.
Committee comments regarding the collision statistics:
o Committee Member Hingey noted that the bicyclist that was at fault on Baden near Spruce
was because they were on the sidewalk. He noted that, legally, bicyclists are required to be
on the street but considering what Baden is like to bike on and not everyone has the
confidence to do it. Statistically, it looks like the bicyclist was at fault, but they may prefer
the sidewalk because of the volume and speed of vehicles. Committee Member Hingey
shared that he hopes that when City staff is considering streets for improvements that they
don’t skip this because it was noted that the bicyclist was at fault.
o Chair Yip asked if someone is parked illegally, because they are parked in a space that is
daylighted, can that person be at fault if there is a collision. California law states no
because the person who is actively in the collision is at fault and not a parked vehicle even
though the parked vehicle caused the lack of visibility. Sergeant Portolan said that a parked
vehicle cannot be at fault during a collision and gave examples.
ACTION: Informational: None taken, none required
14
3. San Bruno / South San Francisco Community-Based Transportation Plan – Presentation on the
Proposed Community Engagement Plan (Noé Noyola from MIG Consultant Team)
Committee comments:
o Chair Yip asked if MIG has a list of community groups that are already engaged in this scope
or a contract for the community groups. He offered to connect the MIG team with a contact
at Rise South City.
o Consultant Noyola shared that $30,000 is included in the budget to work with Community
Based Organizations (CBOs) and trusted partners so they can engage with them and pay
people for their time.
o Chair Yip asked what the process is to select which organizations they will work with.
o Consultant Noyola shared that they have pop-up events and community briefings planned.
During community briefings, CBOs will make presentations directly to their constituents.
Additionally, there will be a map-based survey where community members can leave
comments. He asked if BPAC had any contacts that they can reach out to so a connection
could be made to CBOs and other community groups.
o Committee Member Hingey shared that BART and Caltrain stations help people get to the
project area. Anything that can get people to the Centennial Trail would contribute in a big
way.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl shared that the MTC defines the Equity Priority Communities. In
the next two years, there will be a new map of Equity Priority Communities, and it is
anticipated that the City of San Bruno will no longer have an Equity Priority Community and
the area East of 101 in South San Francisco will no longer be designated an EPC. Secretary
Wooley-Ousdahl shared that to her understanding these are areas that have environmental
sensitive areas and there will be funding.
o Consultant Noyola shared that that the change in designation doesn’t prevent cities from
continuing their planning and identifying funding.
o Committee Member Moreno shared that Centennial Way Trail is a key connector. He stated
that Centennial Trail is the spine of the network and Spruce Avenue would be huge to
connect to the new Safeway. That is a large area where he sees a lot of cyclists. He
suggested a slow street program where traffic calming could connect to Centennial Way
Trail and be inviting to bicyclists.
o Consultant Noyola agreed that Centennial Way Trail would be a great spine and as there is
a lot of development happening. The next community engagement effort will be a map
survey where one could put a pin and add areas of improvement, such as connections to
Centennial Way Trail.
o Committee Member Moreno suggested any sort of events in the new library would be a hub
of great activity.
o Consultant Noyola asked if there are any merchants or other groups that the team should
reach out to.
o Committee Member Guzman suggested the farmers’ market in South City.
o Committee Member McAuley suggest HOTHRA – Historical Old Town Homeowners &
Renters Association.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl shared that once the mapping exercise is available it will be
shared with BPAC and friends.
o Committee Member Moreno asked if digital ads and social media are being done.
Consultant Noyola shared that there is a budget for communications outreach.
o Secretary Wooley-Ousdahl shared that MIG met with the City of SSF Communications
Manager who will share information through the City’s channels.
15
o Chair Yip suggested Consultant Noyola go to the Traffic Safety Commission and see if some
of the members have comments. Spanish is also the most spoken non-English language so
that would be a good way to share information with the community.
o Committee Member Guzman suggested Consultant Noyola go to Off the Grid in San Bruno.
There are lots of people at the food trucks on Tuesdays.
ACTION: Informational: None taken, none required
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
• Committee Member McAuley was very happy to have the Police Department present at the
meeting.
• Committee Member Guzman shared that the 20% decrease in collisions is a good trajectory.
• Chair Yip asked how the statistics compared to last year.
STAFF COMMENTS
• None.
MEETING ADJOURNED: 7:06PM. Committee Member Hollenback motioned, Committee Member Guzman
seconded.
_____________________________ _____________________________
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, AICP Darryl Yip, BPAC Chair
BPAC Secretary
16
City of South San Francisco
Legislation Text
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400
Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
File #:25-72 Agenda Date:1/28/2025
Version:1 Item #:
5. Complete Streets Checklist Review for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Complete Streets
Active Transportation Technical Assistance Round 2 Program Grant Application - Checklist #1: City of South
San Francisco; and Checklist #2: Town of Colma (Audriana Hossfeld, Senior Civil Engineer, City of South San
Francisco, and Abdulkader Hashem, Principal Project Manager, Town of Colma)
City of South San Francisco Printed on 1/23/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™17
Contact Name Audriana Hossfeld
Email Address [email protected]
Contact Phone Number 650-829-6604
City/Jurisdiction/Agency
(If your option is not
listed, select "Other")
South San Francisco
County San Mateo
Is your project seeking
regional discretionary
funds or an
endorsement?
Regional discretionary funding
Please include the name
of the regional
discretionary funding
program that this
project is seeking.
Active Transportation Technical Assistance Round 2
Project Name/Title Colma/South San Francisco El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project (Segment C)
Project Area/ Location
The Project is located on El Camino Real between Arlington
Drive and Hickey Boulevard (37.672498, -122.453792 and
37.666548, -122.451372).
Project Area Map
(Attach if applicable)
Please save the file with
the project name and
the jurisdiction
submitting checklist.
Add the name of the file
being uploaded below.
Then Click Here to
upload your file.
Project Maps
Project Description
(2000 character limit).
You may also attach
additional project
documents, cross
sections, plan views or
other supporting
materials.
The Colma/South San Francisco El Camino Real (State Route
82, “ECR”) Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C (Project) spans approximately 0.3 miles between
Arlington Drive and Hickey Road in the City of South San
Fransisco (City). Segment C is the last of three planned
segments (A, B, and C) for bicycle and pedestrian
improvements along the ECR corridor. Although designated as
a state route, ECR currently functions as a local arterial. The
auto-orientated design of ECR presents significant challenges
for pedestrians and bicyclists including narrow and missing
sidewalks, long and infrequent crossings, lack of bicycle
18
facilities, and high vehicle speeds.
The Project aims to enhance multi-modal infrastructure, traffic
operations, accessibility, and safety for users of all ages and
abilities (AAA) while supporting future housing demands. The
Project area is almost entirely lacking of pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure. The Project will transform ECR into a Complete
Streets corridor that provides for pedestrian and bicyclists of
AAA. Proposed improvements include continuous sidewalks,
protected bike lanes, ADA curb ramps, high-visibility
crosswalks, improved street lighting, landscaping, stormwater
treatment measures, and bus stop improvements.
These Project supports the vision set in the Colma El Camino
Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan, the City’s 2022
Active South City Plan, and the Town’s 2023 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan. The Project partners include San
Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA), the Town of
Colma, and City/County Association of Governments of San
Mateo County (C/CAGT) with a budget of $960,000.
Please choose the
project phase(s).PE
Project Supporting
Material (Upload if
applicable) Please save
the file with the project
name and the
jurisdiction submitting
checklist. Add the name
of the file being
uploaded below. Then
Click Here to upload
your file.
Conceptual Design
Do you think your
project qualifies for a
Statement of Exception?
No
Topic: Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Planning
Does the project
implement relevant
plans, or other locally
adopted
recommendations?
Yes
19
Please provide details
on plan
recommendations
affecting the project
area, if any, with Plan
adoption date. If the
project is inconsistent
with adopted plans,
please provide
explanation.
The objective of the Project is to improve pedestrian and cyclist
safety, mobility, and accessibility aligning with the following
local and regional plans:
1)MTC Active Transportation Plan: The ECR corridor is part of
MTC’s planned Regional Active Transportation Network,
highlighting the significance of the Project regionally and
supporting MTC’s vision of creating an AAA active
transportation network that is safe, comfortable, and equitable
for all users.
2)San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan 2021, key safety performance metrics outlined in Table 13
on page 103 of the Plan.
3) South San Francisco Bike and Ped Plan (Active South City)
- adopted June 2022. Active South City plans for Class IV bike
lanes and pedestrian improvements on ECR. Since publishing
the Active South City Plan, Segment C is now planned for
Class I Multi-Use Path improvements due to site specific
constraints.
Does the project area
contain segments of the
regional Active
Transportation (AT)
Network? [See MTC's AT
Network map here]
Yes
If yes, describe the how
project adheres to the
National Association of
City Transportation
Official's (NATCO's)
"Designing for All Ages
& Abilities Contextual
Guidance for High-
Comfort Bicycle
Facilities" and/or the
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board's
"Accessibility
Guidelines for
Pedestrian Facilities in
the Public Right-of-
Way."
The Project proposed the following improvements that support
NACTO AAA design guidance and/or PROWAG design
features: sidewalks, protected bike lanes, ADA curb ramps,
high-visibility crosswalks, street lighting, and bus stop
improvements.
The NACTO defines AAA facilities as those that improve safety,
comfort, and equity for various types of roadway users,
including children, seniors, women, people of color, low-income
riders, and people with disabilities. When roadway volumes
and speeds are high, like in the Project area, the NACTO AAA
guidance is to provide a protected bike lane. The Class I
bicycle lanes included in the Project meet this guidance by
providing separation between bicyclists and vehicular traffic,
significantly reducing conflict zones and stress for users.
Additionally, the NACTO AAA guide highlights additional
strategies to support AAA, including roadway design and
operation changes, which will also be utilized in the Project with
the reconfiguration of the ECR/Mission Road intersection,
installation of two traffic signals, and a road diet. The design
and operations changes will calm traffic and support AAA active
transportation modes.
Various Project improvements, including protected bicycle
lanes, continuous sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, high-visibility
crosswalks, and bus stop improvements align with the
PROWAG standards by ensuring that the corridor is navigable
and safe for individuals with disabilities.
Is the the project on a
known High Injury
Network (HIN) or has a
Yes
20
local traffic safety
analysis found a high
incidence of bicyclist/
pedestrian-involved
crashes within the
project area?
Please summarize the
traffic safety conditions
and describe the
project’s traffic safety
measures. The Bay Area
Vision Zero System may
be a helpful resource.
The Project enhances safety for all modes by incorporating
traffic calming measures, accessible and protected active
transportation facilities, roadway reconfigurations, additional
signals, and pedestrian-scale lighting. The City LRSP identifies
Project improvements as countermeasures that will be most
effective for enhancing safety within the City, including bike
lanes, leading pedestrian intervals, speed feedback signs,
pedestrian signals, and colored bike lanes.
The proposed improvements will significantly enhance safety
on ECR by introducing continuous sidewalks and protected
bike lanes, separating vulnerable road users from vehicular
traffic. According to the NACTO Designing for All Ages and
Abilities guide, the addition of protected bike lanes in New York
City reduced injury crashes for all road users by 40% over four
years, demonstrating the potential impact of similar
interventions in the City.
Does the the project
seek to improve
conditions for people
biking, walking and/or
rolling? If the project
includes a bikeway, was
a Level of Traffic Stress
(LTS), or similar user
experience analysis
conducted?
Yes
Describe how project
seeks to provide low-
stress transportation
facilities or reduce a
facility’s LTS.
A Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) study has not been conducted.
However, the project would include provisions to improve
cyclist and pedestrian conditions and reduce the LTS that
bicyclists and pedestrians experience within the Project Area.
The project would close the gap on an existing AT network
connection, improve the visibility for pedestrians and cyclists,
and add protected bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
A. Are there existing
public transit facilities
(stop or station) in the
project area?
Yes
If yes, list transit
facilities (stop, station,
or route) and all affected
agencies.
The Project is located within a 1/2 mile of South San Francisco
Bart station and there are several Samtrans Bus Stops within
the Project Area along El Camino Real.
B. Have all potentially
affected transit
agencies had the
Yes
21
opportunity to review
this project? If yes,
please save the email
from transit operator(s)
below.
Please save the file with
the project name and
the jurisdiction
submitting checklist.
Add the name of the file
being uploaded below.
Then Click Here to
upload your file.
The project was reviewed by a wide range of affected
stakeholders and transit agencies, including Caltrans,
SamTrans, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), City/County
Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG),
Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC), City of South San
Francisco, and the Colma Police Department. These
stakeholders provided input through their participation in the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and outreach conducted
as part of the El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan (2021) and the Colma Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan (2023). Please refer to “SSF_ECR
Bike&Ped Improvement Plan_TAC.pdf”, and “SSF_Bike&Ped
Master Plan_Stakeholders.pdf” enclosed.
C: Is there a MTC
Mobility Hub (map)
within the project area?
Yes
If yes, please describe
outreach to mobility
providers, and the
project’s Hub-
supportive elements.
Please view the Mobility
Hubs Playbook Play 1.
South San Francisco BART is located within 1/2 mile of the
Project. BART reviewed the Project through their participation
in the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) as part of the El
Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan (2021)
and the Colma Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2023).
If applicable, please
describe the pedestrian
focused improvements
and cite the design
standards used (links to
standards are not
needed).
The Project purpose is to promote bicycle and pedestrian trips
along El Camino Real and within the broader active
transportation network by implementing improvements that
align with contemporary design standards, including NACTO
AAA guidance and the Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility
Guidelines (PROWAG).
The inclusion of ADA-compliant curb ramps, and high-visibility
crosswalks complies with PROWAG accessibility guidelines
and promotes safe, equitable access for individuals using
mobility devices. ADA-compliant curb ramps provide critical
transitions between sidewalks and street crossings, enabling
individuals using wheelchairs, scooters, strollers, or other
mobility devices to travel safely and independently. High-
visibility crosswalks enhance pedestrian safety by improving
driver awareness at crossings, especially in areas with high
vehicle speeds or reduced visibility.
If applicable, please
provide the class
designation for
bikeways included in
the project and cite the
design standards used.
The Project incorporates design principles to support an AAA
active transportation network, including design principles from
the National Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO). Proposed Project improvements include continuous
sidewalks, a protected bikeway, pedestrian refuge islands, ADA
curb ramps, high-visibility crosswalks, bus stop improvements,
lighting, and other roadway features designed to improve
22
comfort, safety, and mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit users along the ECR corridor.
The Project will feature Class I protected bikeways, which are
among the most inclusive types of bicycle facilities. Class I
bikeways provide greater separation between bicyclists and
vehicular traffic, offering a low-stress option for bicyclists.
Will the project improve
active transportation in
an Equity Priority
Community (EPC)?
Yes
Please list census tracts
that are designated as
EPCs and affected by
this project.
Although the Project is not located within a MTC Equity Priority
Community (EPC), it will provide significant benefits to road
users from nearby EPCs (one in Daly City, and two in South
San Francisco) who travel to and through the Town via El
Camino Real (ECR). For example, pedestrians, cyclists, transit
users, and individuals using mobility devices from Census Tract
06081602300 in the City of South San Francisco, located south
of the Project area, will experience improved safety and
mobility when traveling north along ECR.
The proposed Project will implement infrastructure
improvements designed to better connect these communities to
Colma and neighboring cities, fostering increased accessibility
and mobility for all users.
Has a local (city is
preferred and county is
an option) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory
Commission (BPAC)
reviewed this Checklist?
The Checklist will begin
MTC review once the
BPAC meeting has
occurred.
The submission of this checklist will be reviewed by the BPAC.
This option exists to use this CS Checklist submission (pdf
emailed to you) for the BPAC review.
Please provide the
meeting date(s). BPAC
meeting date should
occur before the grant
funding request
application or
endorsement is
submitted.
2/5/25
Please provide a
summary of meeting
comments. If meeting
date hasn't occurred
yet, please share BPAC
meeting comments
here.
Not completed yet
Compliance and Exemption
23
Please check below if
Yes. If no, complete the
Statement of Exception.
If Yes, this Checklist is
complete and the rest of
the form can be
skipped. If No, please fill
out the Statement of
Exception section.
Yes
Has a local (city or
county) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory
Commission (BPAC)
reviewed this Checklist?
The CS Checklist will
begin review once the
BPAC meeting notes are
included in this form.
The Checklist is being submitted to send to the BPAC for
review.
This PDF is generated with the Google Forms Notification add-on.
To generate customized PDFs from Google Forms, download Document Studio (video demo).
These messages are not added in the premium version.
24
COLMA
DALYCITY
DALYCITY
SOUTHSANFRANCISCO
Colma Creek
A
L
TA
LOMA
DR
CRO
W
N
C
I
R
AR
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
D
R
CAMARI
T
A
S
A
V
E
DUVALDR
E
L
K
W
OODDR
CL
A
R
K
A
V
E
A ST
B ST
HICKEYBLVD
NEWM
A
N
D
R
K
IPLINGAVE
C ST
D ST
BR
A
D
F
O
R
D
D
R
CAM
A
R
I
T
A
S
C
I
R
CALVERTAVE
S O U T H G ATEAVE
SERRAMONTE
BLVD
HILLSIDE BLVD
JUNIPEROSERRABLVD
ELCAMINOREAL
JUNIPERO SER
R
A
B
L
V
D
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
MISSION RD
SE R RAMONTECTR
SULLIVAN
AVE
F ST
COLMABLVD
280
82
82
1
Segment C
0 0.20.1 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C Segment C
Other Segments
City
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
25
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment C
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C - Regional Active
Transportation Network
Segment C
Other Segments
Regional Active
Transportation Network
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
26
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment C
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C - Priority
Development Areas
Segment C
Other Segments
Priority Development
Areas (Plan Bay Area
2050)
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
27
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment C
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C - Transit-Oriented
Communities
Segment C
Other Segments
Transit Service Tier
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 3 Parking and Office
Intensity/Tier 4 Residential
Density
San Francisco Bay Region
Jurisdictions (Incorporated
Places and UnincorporatedCounty Lands)
TOC Transit Stations
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
28
29
Attachment B
El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan – Alternative 1 Layout
with
Typical Cross-Sections
30
KE
E
P
CLE
A
R
KE
E
P
CL
E
A
R
31
Attachment C
El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan – Alternative 2 Layout
with
Typical Cross-Sections
32
KE
E
P
CLE
A
R
KE
E
P
CL
E
A
R
33
Contact Name Abdulkader Hashem
Email Address [email protected]
Contact Phone Number (650)757-8897
City/Jurisdiction/Agency
(If your option is not
listed, select "Other")
Colma
County San Mateo
Is your project seeking
regional discretionary
funds or an
endorsement?
Regional discretionary funding
Please include the name
of the regional
discretionary funding
program that this
project is seeking.
Active Transportation Capital Design Technical Assistance
Program Round 2
Project Name/Title El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project
(Segment A)
Project Area/ Location El Camino Real (SR 82) between Albert M Teglia Blvd and
Mission Road in the Town of Colma
Project Area Map
(Attach if applicable)
Please save the file with
the project name and
the jurisdiction
submitting checklist.
Add the name of the file
being uploaded below.
Then Click Here to
upload your file.
Please see "01_Colma_ECR Bike&Ped_ProjectMaps.pdf"
enclosed
Project Description
(2000 character limit).
You may also attach
additional project
documents, cross
sections, plan views or
other supporting
materials.
The El Camino Real (State Route 82, “ECR”) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project- Segment A (Project) spans
approximately 0.95 miles between Albert M Teglia Boulevard
and Mission Road in the Town of Colma (Town). The auto-
orientated design of this corridor presents significant
challenges for pedestrians and bicyclists including narrow and
missing sidewalks, long and infrequent crossings, lack of
bicycle facilities, first mile-last mile transit access, and high
vehicle speeds.
The Project aims to enhance multi-modal infrastructure, traffic
operations, accessibility, and safety for users of All Ages and
Abilities (AAA) while supporting future infill housing demands.
34
To achieve these objectives, the Project will implement
complete street improvements, including continuous sidewalks,
protected bike lanes, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
curb ramps, high-visibility crosswalks, improved street lighting,
landscaping, stormwater treatment measures, bus stop
improvements, reconfiguration of ECR/Mission Road
intersection, and installation of traffic signals at ECR/Mission
and ECR/Collins intersections.
The Project partners include the California Department of
Transportation (CalTrans), City of South San Francisco, San
Mateo County Transportation Authority, and City/County
Association of Governments of San Mateo County. Since the
project’s inception, the Town has actively collaborated with
Caltrans on key Project phases, including Planning, Project
Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS), and
Project Approval and Environmental Documents (PA&ED). A
Cooperative Agreement is currently in progress to oversee the
ongoing PA&ED and future PS&E phases.
The estimated budget for the design of ECR Segment A is
$3,000,000. To supplement this budget, the Town requests the
maximum allowable TA-design funding of $300,000.
Please choose the
project phase(s).PE
Project Supporting
Material (Upload if
applicable) Please save
the file with the project
name and the
jurisdiction submitting
checklist. Add the name
of the file being
uploaded below. Then
Click Here to upload
your file.
Please see "02_Colma_ECR
Bike&Ped_ConceptualDesign.pdf" enclosed
Do you think your
project qualifies for a
Statement of Exception?
No
Topic: Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Planning
Does the project
implement relevant
plans, or other locally
adopted
recommendations?
Yes
Please provide details
on plan
recommendations
affecting the project
area, if any, with Plan
adoption date. If the
project is inconsistent
The objective of the Project is to improve pedestrian and cyclist
safety, mobility, and accessibility aligning with the following
local and regional plans:
1) MTC Active Transportation Plan: The ECR corridor is part of
MTC’s planned Regional Active Transportation Network,
highlighting the significance of the Project regionally and
supporting MTC’s vision of creating an AAA active
35
with adopted plans,
please provide
explanation.
transportation network that is safe, comfortable, and equitable
for all users.
2) San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan 2021, key safety performance metrics outlined in Table 13
on page 103 of the Plan.
3) Town of Colma’s General Plan 2040 Mobility Element – The
Mobility Element Goal (M-1) is to provide and maintain a safe,
efficient, and attractive circulation system that promotes a
healthy, safe, and active community throughout Colma. The
Town has established a "Vision Zero" to eliminate traffic
fatalities and reduce the number of non-fatal collisions by 50
percent by 2040.
4) Colma’s Transportation Safety Action Plan/Town of Colma
Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), 2018. The SSAR
identified systemic treatments to improve safety for all users of
the Town’s roadway network including the Lawndale Blvd
project.
5) Town of Colma’s ADA Transition Plan, 2010. The Plan
outlines its efforts to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure its programs, services,
facilities, and public ROW are accessible to all members of the
public including persons with disabilities.
6) Town of Colma’s Master Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan, Adopted by City Council on August 23, 2023. The Plan
focuses on developing a safe network of bikeways and
walkways, identifying roadway improvements, and
documenting programs and policies that will support the town's
goal of becoming a more bicycle and pedestrian-friendly
community.
7) Town of Colma’s complete streets Policies, 2012. The Town
has adopted a Complete Streets Policy consistent with the
California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358) to create
and maintain Complete Streets that provide safe, comfortable,
and convenient travel along and across Town's streets through
a comprehensive, integrated transportation network that serves
all categories of road users, including pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists, and persons with disabilities.
Does the project area
contain segments of the
regional Active
Transportation (AT)
Network? [See MTC's AT
Network map here]
Yes
If yes, describe the how
project adheres to the
National Association of
City Transportation
Official's (NATCO's)
"Designing for All Ages
& Abilities Contextual
Guidance for High-
Comfort Bicycle
Facilities" and/or the
Architectural and
The Project incorporates design principles to support an AAA
active transportation network, including design principles from
the National Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO). Proposed Project improvements include a road diet,
continuous sidewalks, protected bikeways, pedestrian refuge
islands, ADA curb ramps, high-visibility crosswalks, bus stop
improvements, Street lighting, and other roadway features
designed to improve comfort, safety, and mobility for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users along the ECR
corridor.
The NACTO defines AAA facilities as those that improve safety,
36
Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board's
"Accessibility
Guidelines for
Pedestrian Facilities in
the Public Right-of-
Way."
comfort, and equity for various types of roadway users,
including children, seniors, women, people of color, low-income
riders, and people with disabilities. When roadway volumes
and speeds are high, like in the Project area, the NACTO AAA
guidance is to provide a protected bike lane. The Class IV
bicycle lanes included in the Project meet this guidance by
providing a physical barrier between bicyclists and vehicular
traffic, significantly reducing conflict zones and stress for users.
Additionally, the NACTO AAA guide highlights additional
strategies to support AAA, including roadway design and
operation changes, which will also be utilized in the Project with
the reconfiguration of the ECR/Mission Road intersection,
installation of two traffic signals, and a road diet. The design
and operations changes will calm traffic and support AAA active
transportation modes.
Various Project improvements, including protected bicycle
lanes, continuous sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, high-visibility
crosswalks, and bus stop improvements align with the
PROWAG standards by ensuring that the corridor is navigable
and safe for individuals with disabilities.
Is the the project on a
known High Injury
Network (HIN) or has a
local traffic safety
analysis found a high
incidence of bicyclist/
pedestrian-involved
crashes within the
project area?
Yes
Please summarize the
traffic safety conditions
and describe the
project’s traffic safety
measures. The Bay Area
Vision Zero System may
be a helpful resource.
The Project enhances safety for all modes by incorporating
traffic calming measures, accessible and protected active
transportation facilities, roadway reconfigurations, additional
signals, and pedestrian-scale lighting. Insights from the SSAR
reveal that ECR accounted for 18% of the Town’s total
collisions between 2011 and 2016, making it the third highest
collision corridor in Colma. The Project is located on the
C/CAG Youth-based High Injury Network.
This project is identified in Colma Systemic Safety Analysis
Report (SSAR) among the top-priority safety projects in Colma.
The proposed improvements will significantly enhance safety
on ECR by introducing continuous sidewalks and protected
bike lanes, separating vulnerable road users from vehicular
traffic.
In addition to a protected bike lane, other proposed safety
improvements include speed feedback signs, prohibiting turns
on red, bicycle protections within intersections, green conflict
pavement markings, pedestrian hybrid beacons at uncontrolled
marked crossings, and leading pedestrian intervals at signals.
Does the the project
seek to improve
conditions for people
biking, walking and/or
rolling? If the project
Yes
37
includes a bikeway, was
a Level of Traffic Stress
(LTS), or similar user
experience analysis
conducted?
Describe how project
seeks to provide low-
stress transportation
facilities or reduce a
facility’s LTS.
A Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) study has not been conducted.
However, the project would include provisions to improve
cyclist and pedestrian conditions and reduce the LTS that
bicyclists and pedestrians experience along Lawndale Blvd.
The project would close the gap on an existing AT network
connection, improve the visibility for pedestrians and cyclists,
and add protected bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
A. Are there existing
public transit facilities
(stop or station) in the
project area?
Yes
If yes, list transit
facilities (stop, station,
or route) and all affected
agencies.
The project is located within ¼ mile of the Colma BART Station,
situated within the MTC Transit Oriented Communities Priority
Area (2022) per the MTC Mobility Hub Map, and also served by
multiple SamTrans bus stops along the corridor.
B. Have all potentially
affected transit
agencies had the
opportunity to review
this project? If yes,
please save the email
from transit operator(s)
below.
Yes
Please save the file with
the project name and
the jurisdiction
submitting checklist.
Add the name of the file
being uploaded below.
Then Click Here to
upload your file.
The project was reviewed by a wide range of stakeholders and
transit agencies, including Caltrans, SamTrans, Bay Area
Rapid Transit (BART), City/County Association of Governments
of San Mateo County (C/CAG), Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition
(SVBC), City of South San Francisco, and the Colma Police
Department. These stakeholders provided input through their
participation in the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and
outreach conducted as part of the El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Plan (2021) and the Colma Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan (2023). Please refer to
“Colma_ECR Bike&Ped Improvement Plan_TAC.pdf”, and
“Colma_Bike&Ped Master Plan_Stakeholders.pdf” enclosed.
C: Is there a MTC
Mobility Hub (map)
within the project area?
Yes
If yes, please describe
outreach to mobility
providers, and the
project’s Hub-
supportive elements.
The Project strongly supports existing mobility hubs and
expand active transportation networks by enhancing first/last-
mile connectivity and promoting sustainable transportation
options. Extensive community and stakeholder engagement
were conducted between 2018 and 2023, including
38
Please view the Mobility
Hubs Playbook Play 1.
collaboration with public transit agencies. BART provided input
through its participation in the Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) and other stakeholder processes during the
development of El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Project (2021) and Colma Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan (2023).
If applicable, please
describe the pedestrian
focused improvements
and cite the design
standards used (links to
standards are not
needed).
The Project purpose is to promote bicycle and pedestrian trips
along El Camino Real and within the broader active
transportation network by implementing improvements that
align with contemporary design standards, including NACTO
AAA guidance and the Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility
Guidelines (PROWAG).
The inclusion of continuous sidewalks, ADA-compliant curb
ramps, and high-visibility crosswalks complies with PROWAG
accessibility guidelines and promotes safe, equitable access
for individuals using mobility devices. ADA-compliant curb
ramps provide critical transitions between sidewalks and street
crossings, enabling individuals using wheelchairs, scooters,
strollers, or other mobility devices to travel safely and
independently. High-visibility crosswalks enhance pedestrian
safety by improving driver awareness at crossings, especially
in areas with high vehicle speeds or reduced visibility. The
Project’s design aligns with the AAA principle by prioritizing
safety, accessibility, and comfort for all users, regardless of age
or physical ability.
If applicable, please
provide the class
designation for
bikeways included in
the project and cite the
design standards used.
The Project will feature protected bikeways (Class IV), which
are among the most inclusive types of bicycle facilities. Class
IV bikeways will provide a protective vertical barrier and
separation between bicyclists and vehicular traffic, offering a
low-stress option for bicyclists. The Class IV bicycle lanes
included in the Project meet this guidance by providing a
physical barrier between bicyclists and vehicular traffic,
significantly reducing conflict zones and stress for users.
The traffic volumes in the Project area ranges from 16,700 to
25,000 vehicles per day (2017–2019) with posted speed limits
of 35–40 miles per hour. According to the NACTO Designing
for AAA guide, these conditions warrant the implementation of
protected bicycle lanes or paths (Page 4: “Contextual Guidance
for Selecting All Ages & Abilities Bikeways”). By providing
protected bicycle facilities, the Project directly responds to
NACTO’s recommendations, reducing roadway stress and
improving comfort for vulnerable users.
Will the project improve
active transportation in
an Equity Priority
Community (EPC)?
Yes
Please list census tracts
that are designated as
EPCs and affected by
this project.
Although the Project is not located within a MTC Equity Priority
Community (EPC), it will provide significant benefits to road
users from nearby EPCs in neighboring cities (one in Daly City,
and two in South San Francisco) who travel to and through the
Town via El Camino Real (ECR). For example, pedestrians,
cyclists, transit users, and individuals using mobility devices
39
from Census Tract 06081602300 in the City of South San
Francisco, located south of the Project area, will experience
improved safety and mobility when traveling north along ECR.
While the Town itself does not contain a designated Community
of Concern, segments of its population exhibit characteristics
that align with MTC's criteria for disadvantaged or vulnerable
communities. Additionally, affordable housing near the Colma
BART station, and veteran’s village near ECR-Mission Road
intersection highlight the presence of residents who could
benefit from enhanced transportation access.
The proposed Project will implement infrastructure
improvements designed to better connect these communities to
Colma and neighboring cities, fostering increased accessibility
and mobility for all users.
Has a local (city is
preferred and county is
an option) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory
Commission (BPAC)
reviewed this Checklist?
The Checklist will begin
MTC review once the
BPAC meeting has
occurred.
The submission of this checklist will be reviewed by the BPAC.
This option exists to use this CS Checklist submission (pdf
emailed to you) for the BPAC review.
Please provide the
meeting date(s). BPAC
meeting date should
occur before the grant
funding request
application or
endorsement is
submitted.
2/5/2025
Please provide a
summary of meeting
comments. If meeting
date hasn't occurred
yet, please share BPAC
meeting comments
here.
Not completed yet
Compliance and Exemption
Please check below if
Yes. If no, complete the
Statement of Exception.
If Yes, this Checklist is
complete and the rest of
the form can be
skipped. If No, please fill
out the Statement of
Exception section.
Yes
40
Has a local (city or
county) Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory
Commission (BPAC)
reviewed this Checklist?
The CS Checklist will
begin review once the
BPAC meeting notes are
included in this form.
The Checklist is being submitted to send to the BPAC for
review.
This PDF is generated with the Google Forms Notification add-on.
To generate customized PDFs from Google Forms, download Document Studio (video demo).
These messages are not added in the premium version.
41
COLMA
DALYCITY
DALYCITY
SOUTHSANFRANCISCO
Colma Creek
A
L
TA
LOMA
DR
CRO
W
N
C
I
R
AR
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
D
R
CAMARI
T
A
S
A
V
E
DUVALDR
E
L
K
W
OODDR
CL
A
R
K
A
V
E
A ST
B ST
HICKEYBLVD
NEWM
A
N
D
R
K
IPLINGAVE
C ST
D ST
BR
A
D
F
O
R
D
D
R
CAM
A
R
I
T
A
S
C
I
R
CALVERTAVE
S O U T H G ATEAVE
SERRAMONTE
BLVD
HILLSIDE BLVD
JUNIPEROSERRABLVD
EL CAMINO REAL
JUNIPERO SER
R
A
B
L
V
D
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
MISSION RD
SE R RAMONTECTR
SULLIVAN
AVE
F ST
COLMABLVD
280
82
82
1
Segment A
0 0.20.1 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment A Segment A
Other Segments
City
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
42
COLMA
DALYCITY
DALYCITY
SOUTHSANFRANCISCO
Colma Creek
A
L
TA
LOMA
DR
CRO
W
N
C
I
R
AR
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
D
R
CAMARI
T
A
S
A
V
E
DUVALDR
E
L
K
W
OODDR
CL
A
R
K
A
V
E
A ST
B ST
HICKEYBLVD
NEWM
A
N
D
R
K
IPLINGAVE
C ST
D ST
BR
A
D
F
O
R
D
D
R
CAM
A
R
I
T
A
S
C
I
R
CALVERTAVE
S O U T H G ATEAVE
SERRAMONTE
BLVD
HILLSIDE BLVD
JUNIPEROSERRABLVD
EL CAMINO REAL
JUNIPERO SER
R
A
B
L
V
D
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
MISSION RD
SE R RAMONTECTR
SULLIVAN
AVE
F ST
COLMABLVD
280
82
82
1
Segment A
0 0.20.1 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment A Segment A
Other Segments
City
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
43
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment A
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment A - Regional Active
Transportation Network
Segment A
Other Segments
Regional Active
Transportation Network
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
44
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment A
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment A - Priority
Development Areas
Segment A
Other Segments
Priority Development
Areas (Plan Bay Area
2050)
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
45
California
Coastal National
Monument
MissionSt
B ay St
O ak S t
Ocean Ave
80
280
Golden Gate
Park
Independence
High School
S AN
FRA N CI SC O
Hillside
Blvd
Ba
y
s
h
o
r
e
Blv
d
Sky
l
i
n
e
B
l
v
d
Coast
Hw y
35
1
35
82
280
Sharp Park San Francisco
International
Airport
Colma
Elementary
School
San Bruno
Mountain State
Park
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
DALY CITY
Coyote Point
County
Recreational
Area
Segment A
0 1.50.75 Mi
LEGEND
J:\Colma-23-00038-ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\GV\GIS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS\Colma - ECR Bike Ped PSR PDS.aprx
The El Camino Real Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Project
Segment C - Transit-Oriented
Communities
Segment A
Other Segments
Transit Service Tier
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 3 Parking and Office
Intensity/Tier 4 Residential
Density
San Francisco Bay Region
Jurisdictions (Incorporated
Places and UnincorporatedCounty Lands)
TOC Transit Stations
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS
46
47
Attachment B
El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan – Alternative 1 Layout
with
Typical Cross-Sections
48
KE
E
P
CLE
A
R
KE
E
P
CL
E
A
R
49
Attachment C
El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Plan – Alternative 2 Layout
with
Typical Cross-Sections
50
KE
E
P
CLE
A
R
KE
E
P
CL
E
A
R
51
52
555 County Center, 5th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063 PHONE: 650.599.1406
www.ccag.ca.gov
C/CAG
CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
Atherton • Belmont • Brisbane • Burlingame • Colma • Daly City • East Palo Alto • Foster City • Half Moon Bay • Hillsborough • Menlo Park • Millbrae •
Pacifica • Portola Valley • Redwood City • San Bruno • San Carlos • San Mateo • San Mateo County •South San Francisco • Woodside
August 23, 2024
Patrick Gilster
Director, Planning and Fund Management
San Mateo County Transportation Authority
1250 San Carlos Avenue
San Carlos, CA 94070
Subject: Letter of Support for 2023 Highway Program Call for Projects
Dear Director Gilster,
On behalf of C/CAG, I am writing in support of The Town of Colma’s application to the San Mateo County
Transportation Authority (TA) for the FY 2023 Highway Program Call for Projects. C/CAG is the County
Transportation Agency (CTA) and also the designated Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for San Mateo
County.
The Town of Colma is requesting funding for the El Camino Real Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Project.
We understand that the fund is requested for the preparation of the Project Approval and Environmental
Document (PA&ED) of the El Camino Real (SR-82) Project in Colma from Albert M Teglia Blvd to Arlington
Drive. The improvements along the corridor will encourage people walking and biking where most needed,
create healthy and safe streets and enhance the use of sustainable transportation options.
The completed Project will connect to other transportation modes such as bus facilities on El Camino Real and
access to the Colma BART Station and South San Francisco BART Station. We strongly support this project
that enhances safety, mobility, and sustainability for pedestrians and bicyclists.
C/CAG is the County Transportation Agency (CTA) and also the designated Congestion Management Agency
(CMA) for San Mateo County. C/CAG represents all of San Mateo County’s 764,442 residents through its 21-
member Board of Directors that includes a seat for every jurisdiction in San Mateo County. C/CAG works to
improve mobility, the environment, and equity, as well as prioritizing safety throughout San Mateo County.
This project incorporates all those goals.
We support the Town’s Plan in its effort to focus on roadway safety by significantly reducing or eliminating
fatalities and serious injuries for all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, public
transportation and micromobility users. If you have any questions, please reach out to me directly. Thank you in
advance for your consideration of this project.
Sincerely,
Sean Charpentier
Executive Director
(415) 370-2174
[email protected]
53
54
55
Mercy Housing California
2512 River Plaza Drive, Suite 200, Sacramento, California 95833 o | 916-414-4400 f | 916-414-4490
1256 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94102 o | 415-355-7100 f | 213-743-5828
1500 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 100, Los Angeles, California 90015 o | 213-743-5820 f | 213-743-5828
TTY | 800-877-8973 or 711 mercyhousing.org
Mercy Housing is sponsored by communities of Catholic Sisters
8 August 2023
Brad Donohue
Director of Public Works
Town of Colma
1198 El Camino Real
Colma, CA 94014
RE: Letter of Support for El-Camino Real/Mission Road Intersection Improvement Project
Dear Mr. Donohue,
RE: Letter of Support for the El Camino Real Complete Street Project – PA&ED Phase
Dear Mr. Donohue,
I write on behalf of Mercy Housing in support of the Town’s grant application to be submitted
to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority for the Measure A and W Highway 2023
Program to fund the El Camino Real Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Project.
We understand that the fund is requested for the preparation of the Project Approval and
Environmental Document (PA&ED) of the El Camino Real (SR-82) Project in Colma from Albert
M Teglia Blvd to Arlington Drive. The improvements along the corridor will encourage people
walking and biking where most needed, create healthy and safe streets and enhance the use of
sustainable transportation options.
The completed Project will connect to other transportation modes such as bus facilities on El
Camino Real and access to the Colma BART Station and South San Francisco BART Station. We
strongly support this project that enhances safety, mobility, and sustainability for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Thank you for your consideration of this project.
Sincerely,
Samantha Hogg, MPA
Director of Senior & Supportive Services, Mercy Housing California
56
57
58
Town of Colma – El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project Timeline
12/17/2024
Phase/Major Task Start End Status
Planning/Conceptual, funded by Caltrans - SB1
Sustainable Communities Program
October 2018 January 2021 Completed
Project Study Report-Project Development Support
(PSR-PDS), funded by San Mateo County
Transportation Authority – Measure W
April 2023 December 2024 Near Completion
(Waiting for Caltrans’
approval)
Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA&ED),
funded by San Mateo County Transportation Authority –
Measure W and A Highway Program
July 2024 September 2025 Ongoing
Design (PS&E) – funded by San Mateo County
Transportation Authority – Measure W (Segment B only)
October 2025 November 2026 Not Started
Right-Of-Way Certification June 2026 September 2026 Not Started
Bid, Advertisement, Contractor Selection, and Award January 2027 March 2027 Not Started
Construction April 2027 December 2028 Not Started
59
ID %
Comp
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 23%Colma ECR PA/ED 300 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/26/25
2 100%Kick off Meeting 0 days Mon 8/5/24 Mon 8/5/24
3 30%Task 1. Project Management & Coordination 295 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/19/25 2
4 30%Task 2. Stakeholder Engagement and Coordination 295 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/19/25 2
5 30%Task 3. Community Engagement 295 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/19/25 2
6 98%Task 4. Field Survey and Mapping 70 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 11/8/24
7 100%4.1 Topographical and Boundary Survey 60 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 10/25/24 2
8 95%4.2 Existing Utility Mapping 60 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 10/25/24 2
9 100%4.3 Encroachment Permits 70 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 11/8/24 2
10 29%Task 5. Traffic Forecast and Operational Analysis 260 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 8/1/25
11 100%5.1 Traffic Analysis Scope of Work/Traffic study limits along ECR 5 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 8/9/24 2
12 85%5.2 Traffic Analysis Approach and Methodology 30 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/13/24 2
13 90%5.3 Existing Conditions 80 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 12/13/24 12SS+15 days
14 0%5.4 Highway Safety Manual Analysis 30 days Mon 2/10/25 Fri 3/21/25 15
15 0%5.5 Traffic Forecasts 40 days Mon 12/16/24 Fri 2/7/25 13
16 0%5.6 Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Forecasts 30 days Mon 3/10/25 Fri 4/18/25 17FF,15
17 0%5.7 Future Traffic Operations Analysis 50 days Mon 2/10/25 Fri 4/18/25 15
18 0%5.8 Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR)75 days Mon 4/21/25 Fri 8/1/25 16
19 0%5.9 Traffic Data Support for Environmental Document and Air Quality Analysis10 days Mon 2/10/25 Fri 2/21/25 15
20 5%Task 6. Preliminary Engineering 115 days Mon 10/28/24 Fri 4/4/25
21 25%6.1 Geometric Engineering Drawings 100 days Mon 10/28/24 Fri 3/14/25 7
22 0%6.2 Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report 30 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 1/31/25 21SS+40 days,8,9
23 0%6.3 Preliminary Materials Report 30 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 1/31/25 21SS+40 days,8,9
24 0%6.4 Utility Design, Coordination, and Conflict Analysis 30 days Mon 2/3/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
25 0%6.5 Right of Way Data Sheet 40 days Mon 1/20/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
26 0%6.6 Traffic Management Plan (TMP) Data Sheet 20 days Mon 2/17/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
27 0%6.7 Storm Water Data Report 40 days Mon 1/20/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
28 0%6.8 Water Quality Report 40 days Mon 1/20/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
29 0%6.9 Preliminary Drainage Report 40 days Mon 1/20/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
30 0%6.10 Design Standard Decision Document 40 days Mon 1/27/25 Fri 3/21/25 21FF,14FF
31 0%6.11 Preliminary Cost Estimate 15 days Mon 3/17/25 Fri 4/4/25 21
32 0%6.12 Preliminary Construction Schedule 15 days Mon 2/24/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF
33 0%6.13 Green Infrastructure and Landscape Concept 15 days Mon 3/17/25 Fri 4/4/25 21
34 0%6.14 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 30 days Mon 2/3/25 Fri 3/14/25 21FF,22,23
35 0%Task 7. Environmental Studies 120 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 6/6/25
36 0%7.1 Air Quality and Modeling 30 days Mon 2/24/25 Fri 4/4/25 19
37 0%7.2 Biological Resources/ Natural Environment Study 60 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 3/14/25 21SS+40 days
38 0%7.3 Cultural/ Paleontological/ Historical/ Tribal Resources 120 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 6/6/25 21SS+40 days
39 0%7.4 Floodplain and Water Quality Study 60 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 3/14/25 21SS+40 days
40 0%7.5 Noise Study 20 days Mon 2/24/25 Fri 3/21/25 19
41 0%7.6 Community Impact Assessment 60 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 3/14/25 21SS+40 days
42 0%7.7 Visual Impact Assessment 60 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 3/14/25 21SS+40 days
43 0%7.8 Hazardous Waste/Materials 30 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 1/31/25 21SS+40 days
44 0%7.9 Energy Study 30 days Mon 12/23/24 Fri 1/31/25 21SS+40 days
45 0%Task 8. Environmental Document and Project Report 120 days Mon 4/14/25 Fri 9/26/25
46 0%8.1 Environmental Document 50 days Mon 6/23/25 Fri 8/29/25 18FS-30 days,35
47 0%8.2 Project Report 120 days Mon 4/14/25 Fri 9/26/25 46FF+20 days,21,31
8/5
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Half 2, 2024 Half 1, 2025 Half 2, 2025
Colma ECR Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project - PA&ED
December 5, 2024
60
1 Traffic Control System LS 1 $151,400 $151,400
2 Job Site Management LS 1 $378,500 $378,500
3 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
4 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan LS 1 $28,000 $28,000
5 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $6,000 $6,000
6 Tree Removal LS 1 $4,000 $4,000
7 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 9230 $30 $276,900
8 Remove Concrete (Curb) LF 1810 $15 $27,150
9 Remove Concrete (Sidewalk) SQYD 6180 $80 $494,400
10 Remove Guardrail LF 1420 $12 $17,040
11 Roadway Excavation CY 7550 $100 $755,000
12 Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 230 $75 $17,250
13 Offhaul LS 1 $20,000 $20,000
14 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 4480 $150 $672,000
15 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 3900 $150 $585,000
16 Minor Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 11560 $100 $1,156,000
17 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 21340 $50 $1,067,000
18 Curb Ramp EA 58 $7,000 $406,000
19 Minor Concrete (Median, Sidewalk, & Driveway) CY 1130 $1,050 $1,186,500
20 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 14340 $3 $43,020
21 Green Thermoplastic Bike Lane Surface SF 6150 $14 $86,100
22 Thermoplastic Stripe Crosswalk SF 7230 $12 $86,760
23 Pavement Markers EA 84 $20 $1,680
24 Detectable Warning Surface SF 2150 $50 $107,500
25 Midwest Guardrail System (7' Post) LF 1340 $45 $60,300
26 Drainage LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
27 Adjust Manhole to Grade EA 38 $2,500 $95,000
28 Adjust Utility Box to Grade LS 1 $10,800 $10,800
29 Adjust Utility Vault to Grade LS 1 $199,000 $199,000
30 Relocate Fire Hydrant EA 12 $2,200 $26,400
31 Relocate Utility Pole EA 60 $5,000 $300,000
32 Relocate Roadside Sign EA 104 $400 $41,600
$8,586,300
33 Soldier Pile Wall SF 510 $350 $178,500
$178,500
34 Street Lighting LS 1 $2,750,000 $2,750,000
35 Traffic Signal Installation/Modification at Various Locations LS 1 $2,750,000 $2,750,000
$5,500,000
36 Landscaping & Irrigation LS 1 $1,170,000 $1,170,000
37 Bioretention LS 1 $400,000 $400,000
38 Construction Site BMP LS 1 $190,000 $190,000
$1,760,000
39 Mobilization (10% of Construction Cost) LS 1 $1,514,000 $1,514,000
40 Minor Items (10% of Bid Items) LS 1 $1,569,000 $1,569,000
$3,083,000
$19,107,800
$5,732,400
$24,840,200
Colma El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan
PSR/PDS Alternative 1 - Segment A
December 2024
ITEM No. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
ROADWAY
CONTINGENCY (30%) =
GRAND TOTAL =
SUBTOTAL
MOBILIZATION & MINOR ITEMS
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
LANDSCAPE
SUBTOTAL
ELECTRICAL
SUBTOTAL
STRUCTURES
TOTAL = GRAND TOTAL
J:\Colma 24-00178 El Camino Bike Ped-PA&ED\Estimates\
2 of 4
12/4/2024 61
1 Traffic Control System LS 1 $166,500 $166,500
2 Job Site Management LS 1 $416,250 $416,250
3 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
4 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan LS 1 $28,000 $28,000
5 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $40,000 $40,000
6 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 9170 $30 $275,100
7 Remove Concrete (Curb) LF 9020 $15 $135,300
8 Remove Concrete (Sidewalk) SQYD 6200 $80 $496,000
9 Remove Guardrail LF 1420 $12 $17,040
10 Roadway Excavation CY 10600 $100 $1,060,000
11 Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 230 $75 $17,250
12 Offhaul LS 1 $20,000 $20,000
13 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 6810 $150 $1,021,500
14 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 6260 $150 $939,000
15 Minor Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 11540 $100 $1,154,000
16 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 27390 $50 $1,369,500
17 Curb Ramp EA 58 $7,000 $406,000
18 Minor Concrete (Median, Sidewalk, & Driveway) CY 1130 $1,050 $1,186,500
19 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 20070 $3 $60,210
20 Green Thermoplastic Bike Lane Surface SF 6330 $14 $88,620
21 Thermoplastic Stripe Crosswalk SF 7750 $12 $93,000
22 Pavement Markers EA 88 $20 $1,760
23 Detectable Warning Surface SF 1770 $50 $88,500
24 Midwest Guardrail System (7' Post) LF 1340 $45 $60,300
25 Drainage LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
26 Adjust Manhole to Grade EA 38 $2,500 $95,000
27 Adjust Utility Vault to Grade LS 1 $227,000 $227,000
28 Relocate Fire Hydrant EA 12 $2,200 $26,400
29 Relocate Utility Pole EA 60 $5,000 $300,000
30 Relocate Roadside Sign EA 125 $400 $50,000
$10,118,730
31 Soldier Pile Wall SF 510 $350 $178,500
$178,500
32 Street Lighting LS 1 $2,750,000 $2,750,000
33 Traffic Signal Installation/Modification at Various Locations LS 1 $2,750,000 $2,750,000
$5,500,000
34 Landscaping & Irrigation LS 1 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
35 Bioretention LS 1 $400,000 $400,000
36 Construction Site BMP LS 1 $209,000 $209,000
$1,809,000
37 Mobilization (10% of Construction Cost) LS 1 $1,665,000 $1,665,000
38 Minor Items (10% of Bid Items) LS 1 $1,724,000 $1,724,000
$3,389,000
$20,995,230
$6,298,600
$27,293,900
ROADWAY
CONTINGENCY (30%) =
GRAND TOTAL =
MOBILIZATION & MINOR ITEMS
LANDSCAPE
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
ELECTRICAL
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
STRUCTURES
TOTAL = GRAND TOTAL
Colma El Camino Real Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan
PSR/PDS Alternative 2 - Segment A
December 2024
ITEM No. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
J:\Colma 24-00178 El Camino Bike Ped-PA&ED\Estimates\
2 of 4
12/4/2024 62