Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarbella Housing Subdivision Draft EIR Appendixes 10-05-2001DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIXES CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO October 5, 2001 MARBELLA HOUSING SUBDIVISION -~ MARBELLA HOUSING SUBDIVISION DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIXES CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO October 5, 2001 APPENDIX A INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST EXPLANATIONS INITIAL STUDY MARBELLA HOUSING SUBDIVISION The Planning Division of the City of South San Francisco has prepared the following Initial Study for the proposed Marbella Housing Subdivision. Proposed Project: The proposed Marbella Housing project is a high density, multifamily development comprised of 280 units. The proposed project site is a 14.9 acre parcel located on the west side of Gellert Boulevard between Westborough Boulevard and King Drive in the City of South San Francisco. The project would have a density of 18.8 units per acre. The project consists of six 4-story buildings over two levels of partially subterranean parking. The buildings, which will be 70 feet in height, would include 46 one-bedroom units, ] 42 two-bedroom units and 92 three-bedroom units, a recreation center and 630 parking stalls, 474 of which will be in the subterranean garages. The proposed project requires the following entitlements: 1. General Plan Amendment: l) to change the land use designation from mixed medium density residential and community commercial to high density residential to permit construction of residential s at a density of 18.8 units per acre, and 2) to modify Policy 3.11-I-2 regarding the Westborough/Gellert Urban Design Plan; 2. Rezoning C-1 Retail Commercial to R-3-L to allow a multifamily development constructed at a density of 18.8 units per acre; 3. Planned Unit Development Permit to allow construction of buildings in excess of the 50 height limit in the R-3-L district and private streets; 4. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 5. Development Agreement Findings: The proposed project may have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared. Reasons Supporting Findings: This initial study has been prepared under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on the results of the Initial Study, the proposed project may have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Initial Study Prepared by: Susy Kalkin, Principal Planner A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at the Planning Division, 315 Maple, South San Francisco, CA 94080. I, Susy Kalkin, hereby certify that this Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and applicable state and city guidelines Susy Kalki Principal anner ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM l . Project Title: Marbella Housing Subdivision 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of South San Francisco, Planning Division, P.O. Box 711, South San Francisco, CA 94083 3. Contact Person: Allison Knapp, Consulting Planner, 650/877-8535 4. Project Location: The west side of Gellert Boulevard between Westborough Boulevard and King Drive. 5. Project Sponsor: DUC Housing Partners, Carol Anne Painter, 14107 Winchester Boulevard, Suite H, Los Gatos, CA 95032 6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Medium Density Residential and Community Commercial. 7. Zoning Designation: C-1, Retail Commercial 8. Project Description: The proposed Marbella Housing project is a high density, multifamily development comprised of 280 units. The proposed project site is a 14.9 acre parcel located on the west side of Gellert Boulevard between Westborough Boulevard and King Drive in the City of South San Francisco. The project would have a density of 18.8 units per acre. The project consists of six 4-story buildings over two levels of partially subterranean parking. The buildings, which will be 70 feet in height, would include 46 one-bedroom units, 142 two-bedroom units and 92 three-bedroom units, a recreation center and 630 parking stalls, 474 of which will be in the subterranean garages. 9. Surrounding Land Uses: The site is bounded on the west and north by medium density residential uses and on the east and south by commercial uses, including two shopping centers, a gas station and a fast food restaurant. The site itself has a substantial grade variation as the result of its use in the 1970's as a source for fill during the construction of Gellert Boulevard. The topography rises from east to west approximately 100 feet to the top of a bluff, on which are located the residential uses. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: ~` • o~ T, Z l~ ~~ (Signal ) Title: ~~~ .o~e~~ ~l~-.~.~~ For the City of South San Francisco ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT The environmental factors listed below would be potentially affected by the Marbella Housing Project, involving at least one impact that is "potentially significant" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 1. Land Use and Public Policy 2. Geology 3. Transportation/Circulation 4. Visual Resources 5. Noise 6. Biology 7. Hazardous Materials Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista'? h) Suhstantially damage scenic resources, ~ (~ including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,.and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings'? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Il. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use'? h) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural ~ ~ ~ (~ use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing em~ironment which. due to their location or nature. could result in conversion of Farmland. to non-agricultural use'? 111. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the hollowing determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation oh the applicable air quality plan'? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation`? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations'? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people'? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service'? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Potentialh~ Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation ]mpact Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means'? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance'? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan'? Less Than Potentialh~ Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact ]ncorporation Impact ]mpact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5'? h) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to fi 15064._5'? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature'? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential suhstantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other suhstantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides'? h) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil'? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstahle, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporation Impact No ]mpact Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No lmpacl ]ncorporation Impact Impact d) Be located nn expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property'? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water'? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ~ (~ environment through the routine transport, use. or disposal of hazardous materials? h) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of~ hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land ~ ~ ~ (~ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss. injury or death involving wildland fires. including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands'? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements'? h) Suhstantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would he a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)'? c) Suhstantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration o1• the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map'? Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation ]mpact Impact ~ ~ ~ ~ h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood 17ows'? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam'? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community'? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect'? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state'? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local genera] plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No ]mpact Incorporation Impact Impact X1. NOISE -Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local genera] plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundhorne vibration or groundhorne noise levels'? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project'? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase ~ ~ ~ (~( in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land ~ ~ [~ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ~ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULAT]ON AND HOUSING -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere'? Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities. need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection'? Police protection'? Schools'? Parks'? Other public facilities'? XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or he accelerated? h) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? h) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of~ service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns. including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in suhstantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)'? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)'? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ~ Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs'? Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No ]mpact Incorporation Impact Impact Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No ]mpact ]ncorpuration Impact Impact g) Comply with federal, state. and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste'? XV11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade ~ ~ (~ `~" the quality of the environment, substantially Y reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory'? h) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited. but cumulatively considerable'? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects o1~ other current projects, and the effects of prohahle future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION OF INITIAL STUDY FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS 1. Land Use. Would the project: a. Physically divide the community? Discussion. The project site is the only vacant site of significant size in the area. The remaining portion of the neighborhood is already established. The site is relatively isolated given the significant change in topography. This topographic change currently separates the site from adjacent residential uses to the west. b. Be inconsistent with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Discussion. The project, as proposed, includes a request to change the land use designation of the site from rnixed medium density residential and community commercial to High Density Residential and to modify General Plan Policy 3.11-1-2 to encourage adherence to the Westborough/Gellert Urban Design Plan rather than require strict adherence to the Plan. The medium density residential designation permits up to 18 dwelling units per acre; the proposed project has a density of 18.8 units per acre. The WestboroughlGellert Design Plan was published in 1991. This Design Plan addresses design issues for the specific study area, and is to be used in conjunction with the General Plan and the Zoning ordinance. The purpose of the "...Design Plan is to develop and urban design strategy to improve and enhance the visual quality of this important area by providing a focus for the neighborhood, thereby improving the representative image of the City of South San Francisco. The Westborough/Gellert Design Plan also provides detailed design and development guidance for an area that includes the proposed project site. The guidelines indicate there is a desire to provide homes in close proximity to commercial and office uses, while ensuring that the development of vacant parcels does not negatively impact the existing residential and commercial areas. While many of the design guidelines continue to provide pertinent and beneficial design guidance, the plan as it relates to this site was predicated on a mixed-use development, whereas the project is solely residential. The project includes a request to amend the General Plan to High Density Residential, which would allow for the proposed density. If the requested amendments to the General Plan are approved, the potential inconsistencies would be eliminated and the project would be considered consistent with applicable plans and public policy. c. Be inconsistent with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Discussion. The project site is not located within the area of any known habitat or community conservation plan and is, therefore not inconsistent with any such plan. 2. Geology and Soils. Would the project: 4 a. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable as a result of on- or off- site land slide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Discussion. Berlogar Geotechnic Consultant performed a preliminary geoteehnical investigation at the site and a June 1, 2000 report (incorporated by reference) was submitted. The report included several conclusions. • Existing cut slope. The 20-year old cut slope has performed relatively well. Shallow slumps have developed at several locations. Sandstone bedding is daylighted in several areas. Groundwater is shallow on the cut slope where bedrock bedding is daylighted. These factors could contribute to a long term decrease in the slope's factor of safety. • Existing fill slope. The southern portion of the existing fill slope has experienced some landsliding. Inasmuch as the proposed project does not propose construction on the fill slope, project impacts are expected to be minimal. • Shallow groundwater. The presence of shallow groundwater is inferred from limited flowing of water into one test pit and the presence of numerous phreatiphytic plants. To maintain an acceptable factor of safety of the cut slope at the project site, groundwater in the cut slope should be lowered. • Site drainage. The project cut slope currently contains a number of V-ditches and other drainage conduits. Maintenance and improvement of these facilities, along with drainage facilities for the built portion of the site will be required. • Existing fill. The existing fill encountered at the southern end of the site appears to be compacted and can generally be left in place. • Ground Rupture. The site is not located in a State of California Special Studies (Alquist-Priolo) Zone. No faults are mapped on the site and field investigation revealed no evidence of faulting at the site. Ground rupture at the site as a result of an earthquake is unlikely. • Ground shaking. The site is located in a region of high seismicity given the proximity of the San Andreas and other active faults in the San Francisco bay area. As for all sites in the Bay Area, the project can expect to experience at least one moderate to severe earthquake shaking event during the lifespan of the project. According to the California Division of Mines and Geology at least one earthquake of 6.9 magnitude or greater will strike the San Francisco bay area before 2030. • Liquefaction. Liquefaction is the temporary transformation of a saturated, cohesionless soil into a viscous liquid during strong ground shaking from a major earthquake. No evidence of historic ground failure due to liquefaction on the site was identified, nor were earth materials encountered during excavation of test pits and borings that might be susceptible to liquefaction. The risk of liquefaction at the proposed project site is considered very low. • Lurch Cracking. The sudden swaying, spreading or rolling of the ground during a strong earthquake causes lurching. Lurching is usually accompanied by the development of fissures on slopes overlain by weak soils. The presence of shallow sandstone bedrock over most of the site suggests that cracking is unlikely in the event of an earthquake. • Ground Subsidence. Ground subsidence can occur as the result of shakedown, when dry, cohensionless soils are subject to high amplitude earthquake vibrations. This condition does not exist on site; therefore ground subsidence is not considered an earthquake hazard on the project site. • Earthquake-Induced Landsliding. Strong ground shaking during a major earthquake is likely to cause sympathetic reactivation of landslides in many parts of the bay area. The stability of all slopes is lower during an earthquake than at other times. No landslides involving bedrock are mapped on the project site. Appropriate remedial design and grading of the slope will reduce the risk of seismically induced landslides to a less than significant level. Based on the findings of the preliminary geotechiaical study, the geologic unit and soils at the proposed project site are stable and not subject to landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. b. Result in substantial erosion or loss of top soil? Discussion: The existing cut slope has experienced little erosion for the last twenty years, due to the engineered design, which includes several benches, drainage ditches and other drainage facilities. This design is expected to be maintained and enhanced with the construction of the project. No building is proposed on the slope. The lower portion of the site on which the construction is proposed will be paved and landscaped. Erosion potential during construction will be minimized by compliance with NPDES and City erosion control requirements. c. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides, mudslides or other similar hazards? Discussion: See discussion 2.a. above. d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? Discussion: The site is not located on expansive soils. See discussion 2. a. above. e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Discussion: The project site is served by a sanitary waste water disposal system operated by the City. 3. Air. Would the project: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Discussion: According to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Guidelines, the project itself would not generate sufficient traffic-related emissions to result in a significant impact since BAAQMD's threshold is 530 multifamily units (the proposed project is for 280 multifamily units). While the air quality in the project area complies with federal standards, the air emissions generated in the Bay Area drift to other areas which results in violations of standards elsewhere. As a result the Bay Area is considered anon-attainment area for particulate matter certain ozone precursors. However, given its relatively small size, the project is not considered to be contributing to projected air quality violations. b. The creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion: The project is a residential multifamily development and therefore has no potential for creating objectionable odors affecting large numbers of people. c. Conflict with or obstruct the applicable air quality plan? Discussion: See discussion 3.a. above. d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Discussion: The project is a multifamily residential development and therefore has no potential for creating substantial pollutant concentrations that would affect sensitive receptors. e. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Discussion: See discussion 3.a. above. 4. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project: a. Substantially alter the existing drainage patterns of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a river or stream, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Discussion: The project site includes an engineered cut slope and extensive on-site drainage system designed to prevent, among other things, erosion. The system has functioned successfully for 20 years. The proposed project will upgrade and maintain this system, as well as provide for a new storm drainage system for the portion of the site to be constructed with residential buildings. The area surrounding the project site is fully urbanized and has established urban drainage systems. There are no rivers or streams within proximity to the site that could be affected by the project. b. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flows: Discussion: The site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area. c. Place housing within a 100-year flood area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Discussion: The site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on any flood hazard boundary or insurance rate map. d. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Discussion: The project, which is a multifamily residential development, will not generate any products or compounds, which could degrade water quality. The site will generate wastewater and storm water runoff, both of which will be collected by existing Ciry systems and treated in accordance with state and federal law. The existing stormwater system was constructed with the capacity to service the project site, which is surrounded by other urban uses. e. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level? Discussion: The project will be served by the Westborough Water District and will not rely on ground water. f. Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Discussion: See discussion 4.d. above. g. Expose people or structures to a significant loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Discussion: See discussion 4. c. above. There are no dams or levees in the vicinity of the project site. h. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Discussion: The project site is located approximately 2 miles from the Pacific Ocean, with hills intervening. The potential for inundation is very low. The surrounding areas are developed with urban use on stable soils. The cut slope on site is stable and consists largely of sandstone bedrock. The potential for mudflows is low. i. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Discussion: See discussion 4.d. above. j. Substantially alter the existing drainage patterns of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a river or stream, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface water runoff in a manner that would result flooding on- or off-site? Discussion: See discussions 4. a. and 4. c. above. 5. Biological Resources. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the State Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Discussion: Thomas Reid and Associates conducted a biological survey of the site on November 29, 1999. The survey identified several common vegetation and bird types at the site. No listed plant or animal species were observed. The site provides very limited habitat cover and there are no trees on site that could serve as nesting habitat. The site is not considered suitable habitat for the three endangered species of butterflies that inhabit areas within three mile of the site. A second biological survey that specifically surveyed the site for butterfly presence as well as potential habitat concluded the site did not provide suitable butterfly habitat. The areas adjacent to the site are fully developed with urban uses. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans. policies or regulations or by the State Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service'? Discussion: Zentner and Zentner prepared a preliminary wetland delineation for the site. This delineation revealed no jurisdictional wetlands on the site. The few of willow stands on site did not contain hydric soils or under-story vegetation typically found in wetlands. The delineation concluded that no riparian or other wetland habitats exist on the project site. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act through the direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Discussion: See discussion S.b. above. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident of migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Discussion: See discussion S.a. above. e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? Discussion: See discussion S.a. above. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion: See discussion 1. c. above. 6. Noise. Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or a generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Discussion: The proposed project is a multifamily residential development that will be the source of and home to receptors of noise levels common to urban areas. The site is designated for residential uses by the City General Plan and is adjacent to commercial shopping centers and two major streets. The site is located between the 65 and 70dB CNEL noise contour of Interstate 280. This is considered a potential significant impact. The project, when completed, would not generate noise or vibrations beyond that which is typical of and common to the surrounding community. b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Discussion: See discussion 6.a. above. c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? Discussion: See discussion 6.a. above. d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Discussion: Temporary increases in ambient noise levels could occur during the construction phase of the project. Compliance with the local noise ordinance and typical conditions of approval limiting hours of construction and use of certain types of noise- generating construction equipment typically will reduce these potential impacts to acceptable levels. Also see discussion 6. a. above. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project to excessive noise levels? Discussion: The project site is located outside the 65 dB CNEL noise contour for the San Francisco International Airport. However, it is located within the boundaries for the retrofit area as designated by the Ciry General Plan and the ALUC Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This is considered a potentially significant impact. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion: The project site is not located within the vicinity or potential noise impact area of any private airstrip. 7. Aesthetics. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Disca~ssion: The project site is adjacent to a medium density residential neighborhood located west of the site at the top of cut slope. This neighborhood has generally unobstructed views of the Ciry and San Francisco Bay (except for the homes at the north end which have substantial vegetation which obscures views). The proposed project's buildings are 70 feet high. While the elevation from the flat area of the site where the buildings will be constructed to the top of the cut slope is over 100 feet, there is potential for impacts to the views currently experienced by the existing residences. b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Discussion: The project site is vacant and devoid of any trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings. It is surrounded by urban development, including shopping centers, a fast food restaurant, and medium density residential uses. The site is also not within any state scenic highway corridor. c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Discussion: The proposed project site is a vacant 14.9 acre parcel, which was used as fill for road construction in the 1970's. The site was fully graded in anticipation of commercial or residential development. The engineered cut slope has several graded benches and drainage ditches for erosion control purposes. The site is largely covered with native grasses. There are no trees or other significant visual features that distinguish the site. The site is surrounded by commercial and residential development. d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, Discussion: The project proposal includes lighting for the parking areas not located under the buildings. The proposed buildings will also be lighted. While the site is l0 located adjacent to existing commercial uses, there is potential for the light generated by the project to impact residential areas to the west of the project. 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous waste? Discussion: The proposed project is a multifamily residential project. The project does not include any component that would be related to the transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials. b. Crea[e a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Discussion: See discussion 8. a. above. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Discussion: See discussion 8. a. above. d. Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Discussion: Hertshaw Associates conducted a Phase I site reconnaissance on April 6, 2000. A review of regulatory agency files and historical aerial photographs was conducted, as well as an analysis of soils samples from the site. Finally, a review of hazardous materials sites was also undertaken. As a result of these reviews, it was determined that the project site is neither on any list of hazardous materials sites, nor are any hazardous materials or chemicals actually present on the site. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Discussion: The project area is located outside all safety hazard zones designated in the San Francisco International Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan. No safety hazards will result to people living in the proposed project. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Discussion: The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. g. Impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Discussion: The City adopted an Emergency Response Plan in 1995. The project does not interfere with any evacuation routes or other aspects of the plan. h. Expose people or structures to risk of loss or injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands'? Discussion: The project site is located in a completely urbanized area. No open space lands, other than the site itself, exist within proximity of the site. 9. Population and Housing. Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? Discussion: The proposed project would provide 280 new housing units within the City on a site that is currently vacant. The project would provide housing for approximately 650 people. The current population of the city is approximately60,000. The project site is one of the few remaining sites in the city available for residential development. The proposed multifamily units would be relatively affordable (compared to single family home costs), thereby permitting employed persons working in the area to live in closer proximity to their jobs. The population increase of 1 % resulting from the project is not considered substantial and is anticipated as a part of the population growth projected in the General Plan. The project is considered potentially beneficial in that it would provide more affordable housing choices to existing residents. b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion: See discussion 9. a. above. c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion: See discussion 9. a. above. 10. Transportation/Traffic. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Discussion: A traffic study was conducted by Crane Transportation Group and published February 14, 2001. The project traffic impacts were analyzed in relationship to the existing and projected future traffic conditions in the vicinity of the project. The increase in trips generated by the project in the area is not considered significant; however, because existing traffic conditions at specific intersections in the area are presently impacted, the project will result in an increase of traffic at congested intersections. The project may also contribute to congestion on Interstate 280. These are considered potential significant impacts. b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? Discussion: There are two roadway segments in the county Congestion Management Plan which are potentially impacted by the proposed project: 1-280 and Skyline Boulevard. The project may contribute to congestion on these roadway segments. c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Discussion: The project has no relationship to or bearing on air traffic pattersu. 12 d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Discussion: The project site has existed in its present state for over 20 years. The project itself will not increase any such hazards. However, the line of sight from the project driveways northward on Gellert Boulevard does have the potential to be impaired if on-street parking is permitted. Wilsey Ham prepared a line of sight analysis on May 31, 2000 that includes recommendations to eliminate any line of sight problems. e. Result in inadequate emergency access? Discussion: The project design provides three access points and emergency through access at the south end of the site. The project driveway and roadway widths and locations are consistent with existing city design standards. f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? Discussion: The proposed project includes 630 parking spaces for 280 housing units. The city Zoning Ordinance requires 2.25 parking spaces per unit, or 630 spaces. The project will not result in creating inadequate parking capacity. g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Discussion: The city or other transportation agencies have no alternative transportation plans for the project area with which the project would conflict. There are no designated bus or bicycle routes on Gellert Boulevard. The project proposal includes a shuttle bus system, which would provide residents service to BART and Cal Train stations. 11. Public Services. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the need for which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable levels of service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: Fire protection; police protection; schools; parks; or other public facilities? Discussion: The proposed project represents the infill of an isolated vacant parcel of land surrounded by existing urban development. The city currently provides all public services, except schools, to the area. No service deficiencies are currently experienced in the area. The addition of 650 new residents in the project, compared to a city population of 60,000 does not represent a significant increase in demand for services or decrease in response times. 12. Recreation. Would the project: a. Result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Discussion: There are two public parks within one quarter mile of the project site: Sellick and Westborough Parks. Sellick is a 6.8 acre neighborhood park located on Appian Way. Westborough Park is also about one quarter mile away on Galway. None of these facilities are currently considered impacted or overused. The project is expected to generate about 650 new residents who potentially will make use of the available facilities. This is not considered a significant increase in potential facility users. 13 b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion: The proposed project includes an indoor recreation facility in a portion of one of the six residential buildings. This facility will not result in impacts beyond those identified for the overall project. No new off-site facilities are anticipated to be expanded or constructed as a result of the project. 13. Cultural Resources. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 915064.5? Discussion: The project site was used as a source for fill in the 1970's. The site has been completely stripped and graded. Any potential artifacts or other historical or cultural resources have been destroyed, if any ever existed. The site itself has no historical significance. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to 915064.5? Discussion: See discussion 13. a. above. c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, site or unique feature? Discussion: See discussion 13.a. above. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal cemeteries? Discussion: See discussion 13. a. above. 14. Utilities and Services. Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Discussion: The proposed project wastewater treatment needs would be serviced by the North San Mateo County Sanitation District which is operated by the city of Daly City. The Ciry of South San Francisco has been provided with a letter from Patrick Sweetland of the North San Mateo County Sanitation District to the Westborough Water District indicating the City of Daly City treatment plant has the capacity to accept the sewage from the project. b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? Discussion: See discussion 14.a. above. Require the construction of new storm drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Discussion: The project, which is a multifamily residential project, will generate waste water and storm water runoff, both of which will be collected by existing City systems and treated in accordance with state and federal lnw. The existing stormwater system 14 was constructed with the capacity to service the project site, which is surrounded by other urban uses. New off-site storm water drainage facilities will not be required. d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements required? Discussion: the Westborough Water District currently serves the project site and neighboring areas. New or expanded entitlements would not be required for the project. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Discussion: See discussion 14. a. above. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Discussion: South San Francisco Scavengers would serve the project site. The company operates a materials recycling facility within the city. The Scavengers are in compliance with all regulations related to the collection, recycling and disposal of solid waste. The waste is disposed at the Ox Mountain Landfill in Half Moon Bay. The landfill has a projected life of to at least 2018 and has capacity for further expansion. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion: See discussion 14.f. above. 15. Mineral Resources. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Discussion: The project site soils consist largely of sandstone bedrock, which is not considered a valuable mineral resource. The site is not identified on any known state, regional or local plans as an important mineral resource site. The site historically was used as a source for fill for the construction of Gellert Boulevard. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion: See discussion 15.a. above. 16. Agricultural Resources. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Discussion: The project site is a completely graded hillside in the middle of a fully urbanized community that has never been use for agricultural purposes. The site is, and has been for over 30 years, zoned for commercial or residential uses. The site is not agricultural land and is not shown on the Resources Agency maps of important farmlands. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson contract'? 15 Discussion: See discussion 16. a. above. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use? Discussion: See discussion 16. a. above. LIST OF SOURCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ]0. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. City of South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance City of South San Francisco General Plan, Background Report and FEIR City of South San Francisco Noise Ordinance City of South San Francisco Inventory of Historic Resources FEMA Flood Hazard Map BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone Maps City of South San Francisco Design Review Guidelines City of South San Francisco Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Design Review Board Minutes City staff Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Berlogar Geotechnic Consultant, June 1, 2000 Biological Survey, Thomas Reid and Associates, November 29, 1999 Special Status Butterfly Report, Zentner and Zentner, August 8, 2000 Preliminary Wetland Delineation, Zentner and Zentner, August 8, 2000 San Francisco International Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan Phase I Site Environmental Assessment and Soils Investigation, Henshaw Associates, April 6, 2000 Traffic Analysis, Crane Transportation Group, February 14, 2001 Line of Sight Analysis, Wilsey, Ham, May 31, 2000 City of South San Francisco Emergency Response Plan Project plans 16 APPENDIX B DKS ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC REPORT Administrative Draft EIR Traffic Analysis For the proposed Marbella Subdivision Project Prepared for Design Community & Environment and City of South San Francisco ey DKS Associates 84 West Sanfa Clara Street, Suife 360 San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 292-9411 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates I. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This section provides a general description of the transportation facilities in the project vicinity and summarizes existing conditions within the study area. The report analyzes the traffic conditions during the weekday a.m., and p.m., peak hours for the following facilities: study area roadways and intersections, bicycle safety, pedestrian safety and parking. The transportation analysis represented in this study follows review and incorporation, where appropriate, of data from the following transportation study prepared for the City of South San Francisco: • Crane Transportation Group, Marbella Subdivision Traffic Impact Report, February 14, 2001. The Crane Transportation Group -Marbella Subdivision Traffic Impact Report, which addressed impacts from development of 74 single-family residences on the project site, is hereafter referred to as the Subdivision Traffic Analysis. In addition, data provided in this section are based on recent telephone conversations with City of South San Francisco staff and site visits conducted in April 2001. 1.1 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CONDITIONS This section presents current conditions on various transportation system components. These components include roadways and intersections, transit services, bicycles, pedestrians and parking. Regional Roadway Network Regional access to the project area is provided by Interstate 280 (I-280) and State Route 35 (Skyline Boulevard). Figure 1 depicts the roadway network serving the project site. Descriptions of regional roadways are provided below. • Interstate 280 (I-280) I-280 is an interstate highway that runs in the north-south direction through the project area. This facility provides access to the project site via an interchange with Westborough Boulevard. • Skyline Boulevard (State Route 35) State Route 85 is a four- and 2-lane facility located to the west of the site. It runs in the north-south direction. Access to the site is provided via its intersections with Westborough Boulevard and King Drive and an interchange with SR-1 to the north and I-280 to the south. Local Access Local access is provided by Westborough Boulevard, King Drive and Gellert Boulevard. Direct access to the project site would be provided from Gellert Boulevard opposite the Pac `N Save-Orchard Supply Hardware driveway. Description of local roadways are provided below. Marbella Project - ADEIR 1 October 2, 2001 Ni~ky B/~d c~ ~- ~, c~ ~ m ~ o ~ N 35 a d P ~'~ CPi `O? a ei~ 280 d King Dr. d Glendale Dr c Row ; \ o '1 I Ma~o~ pr. p~ / 3~° O„ O~ sha~'o o PJa\~~ Oa~~o u ~r F O~ p~ O,. ~ s,~'ie "~ e~~q o a O Project Site FIGURE 1 DKS Associates PROJECT SITE AND ROADWAY NETWORK DKS Associates • Westborough Boulevard Westborough Boulevard is a major arterial roadway that runs in the east-west direction. Access to the site is provided via its intersections with Skyline Boulevard, Galway Drive-Galway Place, Oakmont Drive-Callan Boulevard, Gellert Boulevard and an interchange with I-280. This facility has an east to west uphill alignment from 1-280 to Skyline Boulevard with two-lanes in each direction separated by a raised landscaped median in the vicinity of Skyline Boulevard and three- lanes in each direction separated by a raised median in the vicinity of Gellert Boulevard and 1-280. This roadway extends from its interchange with I-280 to its terminus at Skyline Boulevard where it becomes Sharp Park Road. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. • King Drive King Drive is a four-lane collector roadway in the vicinity of the project. It extends from Skyline Boulevard to the east and to Gellert Boulevard and just east of Junipero Serra to the west. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. • Gellert Boulevard Gellert Boulevard is a four-lane arterial roadway that runs in the north-south direction and parallel to I-280. This facility borders the project site, and provides access from its intersections with Westborough Boulevard, the McDonald's restaurant-Aegis Assisting Living Facility shared driveway and the Pac'N Save-Orchard Supply Hardware. Gellert Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. A raised median restricts turns at most commercial center driveways to right-in/right-out only. This facility has anorth-south downhill alignment from north of King Drive to about the middle of the project frontage (at the signalized access to the Pac'N Save driveway). Transit Service San Mateo County Transit (SAMTRANS) currently operates ten local bus routes and six express routes in South San Francisco. Bus Route 122 provides service within the vicinity of the project. Route 122 travels along Gellert Boulevard and operates on weekdays on 15-minute headways between 6:00- 8:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m. and on 30-minute headways between 8:00 a.m.- 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.-12:00 midnight. This route operates on weekends on 30-minute headways between 8:00 a.m.- 6:00 p.m. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation The 1999 South San Francisco General Plan (General Plan) indicates bicycle facilities in the vicinity of - the project. The existing system consists of three classifications of bicycle facilities: ^ Class I facilities (bike path) -are paved facilities that are physically separated from roadways used by motor vehicles by space or a physical barrier and are designated for bicycle use. ^ Class II facilities (bike lane) -are lanes on the outside edge of roadways reserved for the exclusive use of bicycles, so designated with special signing and pavement markings. Marbella Project - ADEIR 3 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates ^ Class III facilities (bike route) -are roadways recommended for use by bicycles and often ~~ connect roadways with bike lanes and bike paths. Bike routes are designated with signs. The bicycle facilities map, as incorporated into the General Plan, identifies Westborough Blvd and Galway Drive as major bike-routes in the vicinity of the project site. Junipero Serra Blvd and Westborough Blvd (to the east of I-280) include bike lanes, respectively. Pedestrian facilities within the vicinity of the site include sidewalks, crosswalks and pedestrian signals. The existing sidewalks on both sides of the road accommodate pedestrian movements along the adjacent section of Gellert Boulevard. The intersection of Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd includes pedestrian signals and crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection. The intersection of Gellert Blvd/King Dr provides pedestrian crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection. The intersection of Westborough Blvd/Galway Dr-Galway PI also provides pedestrian signals and crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection. The intersection of Gellert Blvd/Pac 'N Save-Orchard Supply Driveway provides pedestrian signals and crosswalks. Pedestrian movements are restricted on the east and west leg of the intersection of Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway and on the south leg of Gellert BIvd/Westborough Blvd. No pedestrian crossings are allowed at the intersection of Westborough Blvd/Olympic Drive. Parking The Development Standards for Residential Development are based on Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance). Parking Requirements for residential uses including multi-family projects must provide 2.0 parking spaces per unit, with at least one parking space covered. In addition, one guest parking space must be provided for every four (4) units. Table 1 illustrates the parking spaces required for the proposed project. TABLE 1 PROPOSED PARKING NUMBER OF RESIDENT NUMBER OF GUEST No. OF UNITS SPACES PARKING SPACES 281 Units 562 70 Total Parking Spaces 562 TO 1.2 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE To evaluate the existing traffic conditions, as well as provide a basis for comparison of conditions before and after project-generated traffic is added to the street system, the Level of Service (LOS) was evaluated at critical intersections. The LOS evaluation indicates the degree of congestion that occurs during peak travel periods and is the principal measure of roadway performance. Marbella Project - ADEIR 4 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates Level of Service Methodology Level of service (LOS) is a common measure of traffic service that uses letters A through F (least to most traffic congestion, respectively) to indicate the amount of congestion and delay. The LOS concept was developed to correlate numerical traffic volumes to subjective descriptions of traffic performance at intersections, which are the controlling bottlenecks of traffic flow. LOS A indicates free flow conditions, while LOS B and C signify stable conditions with acceptable delays. LOS D is typically considered acceptable for peak hour in urban areas, with average delays in the range of 25 to 40 seconds. LOS E is approaching capacity and LOS F represents conditions at or above capacity, with average delays over 60 seconds. Signalized Intersections Traffic conditions at signalized intersections have been evaluated for AM and PM peak hours using the operational analysis procedures from the Transportation Research Board's 1997 Highway Capacify Manual. The level of service (LOS) methodology qualitatively characterizes traffic conditions associated with varying levels of traffic. A LOS determination is a measure of expected average delay per vehicle at an intersection. The AM peak hour generally occurs between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak hour occurs between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. Impacts to intersections may occur outside of the typical peak hour. For example, occasional midday surges of traffic may result in temporary congestion. However, for the purposes of this EIR, only the AM and PM Peak hours have been analyzed, as this is when adjacent street and regional roadway traffic volumes are at their highest levels. Table 2 defines the levels of service for signalized intersections. Unsignalized Intersections Traffic levels of service (LOS) for unsignalized intersections were calculated using the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board) methodology. At unsignalized intersections each approach to the intersection is evaluated separately and assigned a LOS. The level of service is based on average total delay at the intersection, in seconds per vehicle. Table 3 provides definitions of LOS for unsignalized intersections. Total delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. This time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last-in-queue position to the first-in-queue position. Marbella Project - ADEIR 5 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates TABLE 2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS THRESHOLDS LEVEL OF AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY DESCRIPTION SERVICE (SECONDS/VEHICLE) A Delay <_ 10.0 Free flow; minimal to no delay B 0 < Delay <_ 20.0 10 Stable flow, but speeds are beginning to be restricted by . traffic condition; slight delays. Stable flow, but most drivers cannot select their own C 20.0 < Delay <_ 35.0 speeds and feel somewhat restricted; acceptable delays. Approaching unstable flow, and drivers have difficulty D 35.0 < Delay <_ 55.0 maneuvering; tolerable delays. E 55.0 < Delay <_ 80.0 Unstable flow with stop and go; delays F Delay > 80.0 Total breakdown; congested conditions with excessive delays. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, Washington D.C. 1997 TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (SECONDS PER VEHICLE) DESCRIPTION A s 10 Little or no delay B > 10 and <_ 15 Short traffic delay C > 15 and s 25 Average traffic delay D > 25 and <_ 35 Long traffic delay E > 35 and <_ 50 Very long traffic delay F > 50 Extreme delays potentially affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, Washington D.C. 1997 Marbella Project - ADEIR 6 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates Freeway Levels of Service To evaluate the existing freeway traffic conditions, as well as provide a basis for comparison of conditions before and after project-generated traffic is added to the freeway system, the Level of Service (LOS) was identified at segments along nearby freeway facilities. TABLE 4 defines levels of service for freeway segments. LOS ranges from LOS A, or free-flow conditions, to LOS F, or highly congested conditions. TABLE 4 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION FREEWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC CONDITION* A ree-flow operations B easonably free-flow, and free-flow speeds are maintained C low with speeds and or near the free-flow speed D evel at which speed begin to decline with increasing flows E Aeration at capacity F reakdowns in vehicular flow Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Trans portation Research Board, Speaal Report No. 209, Washington D.C. 1997 City of South San Francisco -Standards of Significance Based on the City of South San Francisco level of service standards, an acceptable operating level is defined as LOS D or better at all intersections, and on principal arterials in the CMP during peak hours. In accordance with the Transportation Elements of the City's General Plan, however, LOS E or F may be acceptable during peak hours under certain circumstances. San Mateo County According to the County of San Mateo, the performance standard for signalized intersections is LOS "D" during the A.M. and P.M. Peak hours. The level of service methodology is based on the critical - movements at each signalized intersection. At CMP facilities, the LOS standard is LOS "E". The level of service at CMP intersections is based on an evaluation of all intersection movements. For CMP intersections, a significant impact for a project is defined as: When addition of project traffic causes an increase in traffic beyond established Level of Service (LOS) standard on Routes of Regional Significance as defined by the San Mateo Congestion Management Program (CMP). Marbella Project - ADEIR 7 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates When addition of project traffic causes a signalized or all-way stop controlled intersection to operate below LOS D or the current LOS, if worse than LOS today. • When addition of project traffic causes a substantial decrease in the level of accessibility within South San Francisco and/or failure to provide adequate sites and facilities for pedestrian and bicycle movement within areas of new development and between existing neighborhoods and areas of new development. The following are CMP facilities within the study area by functional classification. • Freeways: I-380 and I-280, • Expressways and Arterials: Skyline Boulevard This analysis has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines established by the San Mateo County CMP. 1.3 EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATION To evaluate current traffic conditions, vehicle turning movement counts were recently conducted on behalf of the City of South San Francisco, on December 12-13, 2000 and on January 17-18, 2001. Counts were conducted during the weekday a.m. (7:00-9:00 a.m.), and p.m. (4:00-6:00 p.m.) peak periods, at eight study intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Figure 2 illustrates the study intersections. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane configuration and traffic control of each of the study intersections. Based on consultation with City of South San Francisco Staff, the following intersections were selected for analysis in this section, and are described in the following text. Those intersections marked with an are unsignalized intersections. 1). Gellert Blvd/King Dr* 2). Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way* 3). Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save/Orchard Supply Driveway 4). Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway 5). Gellert BIvd/VUestborough Blvd 6). Olympic DrNllestborough Blvd* 7). Galway PI/VUestborough Blvd 8). Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway* Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate the existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes, respectively, considered in determining the existing intersection level of service. Table 5 provides a summary of the existing scenario intersection service levels for each of the peak periods analyzed. Appendix A includes the detailed calculation sheets for the existing scenario including AM Peak and PM Peak. Marbella Project - ADEIR 8 October 2, 2001 FIGURE 2 DKSAssociates STUDY INTERSECTIONS K~n9 ~~ _~ ~~ ~~~ J~ ~'. Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site .~ Stop Sign Signal O` ~~ ~~ ~ ~ z' r a i l 1 11 r F 1 _ 1~ I ~ 'm ~ ~ ~1 a ~ ~~~ N SavelOrchaDf}vewaY Hardware McDonalds/ 11 .~ ~ Westborough ShoPP~n9 Center AEGIS Assisted Living Faciltity ~~ ~ ou9r~~vd. y i ~es~bor r J, ~o ~ U 'a E _T 0 DKS Associates FIGURE 3 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL ~y ,v~^ ~o ~~ ~;~°~"' ~ S~~ 1!'~ 9oS ~S Dr• 30 Z20 ~r Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O` h Ory ~~ .~ j s ~ ~ os ~ 'S u e 5 ti ~r h ~ ~ N ~h a a 3 ~o c~ so ~o ~~~ R~i ~°s ~o 1ao ~ I ~ ~ ~ '~. 60 ~ ~~ ~7o Pac ~ Har ~.~- 1 1 ~o "' 1 1 ~, McDonalds/ AEGIS Assisted Living Faciltity !~ V SavelOrchard SupPiY ire Driveway N O ~ .~ 1 201 `1 t 50', m `'' v, o L 't.. 25 105 Westborough Center i ng Shopp * 1~ ~rn o U` x705 175 1610 ~ 45 U 'a i= ~+ ~.~` $5 s~ ~6 ~5 ms`s °~ ~ ~65~ '`~ 2o''y 0~~a' `~~~~0 ss sa C~'~~e 7e~~ a DKS Associates FIGURE 4 EXISTING VOLUMES -A.M. PEAK HOUR ~o ,~%ti~~~ r ss°S~ ~ s~~ r ~~es ~ooo 0 r iC~n9 p ' ~ 1 ,Lp0 ~ Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O` "'`~^ yC9 ~~ * ~ 7 ~ sS 6~p 5ti ~ r . z ~ te ~h a a 3 m ~L S2 ~ O s1~ ~i s2s is ~ ~o ~Ap~ ~ -Y ~ ~o ° °~ ~ X75 SavelOrchard Sup ~ 1 r pac N privewaY ~ _ * 1-lardware ~.~- 1~ 1 ~~ ~ ~, ° 1 1 ~„ wo v, o X01 h t 125 ~'', ~ ~ N '~. 95 McDonalds/ j j'1a5 Westboro Center AEGIS Assisted i' Shopping Living Faciltity a; a' ~~ a ~' 165 o es~b°~°v9 ~ s ~ 26 `N r 161 p ~ i ~` X80 - 3p5 215 ~ ASS 9~ o ~ G o r~~Ja~ 805 ~ ~ 2 %~ 25 -~ o ~ e~%d U ~ 'a E a 0 DKS Associates FIGURE 5 EXISTING VOLUMES - P.M. PEAK HOUR DKS Associates TABLE 5 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS EXISTING SCENARIO A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR # INTERSECTION AvG. DELAY LOS AvG. DELAY LOS 1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr* 17.5 C 25.8 D 2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Wy* 12.2 B 16.9 C 3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save/Orchard Supply Driveway 8.6 A 13.8 B 4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Entrance 6.6 A 8.6 A 5 Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd 39.2 D 35.7 D 6 Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr* 121.8 F 14.6 B 7 Westborough Blvd/Galway PI 23.6 C 14.2 B 8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center* 18.2 C 64.4 F Note: ' Unsignalized intersection. Average Delay in seconds per vehiGe. LOS: Level of Service. Existing Freeway Segment Operation The following freeway segments represent those in San Mateo County that would potentially be impacted by the proposed project: Interstate 280 • SR-1 (North) to SR-1 (South) • SR-1 (South) to San Bruno Ave. According to the 1999 San Mateo County Final Congestion Management Program, the freeway segment of I-280 between SR-1 (North) to SR-1 (South) currently operates at LOS E, while the freeway segment of I-280 between SR-1 (South) to San Bruno Avenue currently operates at LOS D. Marbella Project - ADEIR 13 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates 1.4 BACKGROUND CONDITION This section describes the traffic operating conditions at the study intersections under the year 2002 background condition. The background condition includes the traffic expected to be generated by other recently approved (and un-built) projects prior to completion of the proposed project. Trip Generation Based on the Subdivision Traffic Analysis, the approved projects include those of the City of South San Francisco, Pacifica, Daly City and San Bruno. Approved projects would generate an additional 705 A.M. peak hour, and 406 P.M. peak hour vehicle trips. The proportion of these trips that would travel through the study intersections was used for the intersection LOS analysis under the Background Condition. Table 6 provides a summary of the A.M. peak and P.M. peak hour trip generation for the approved developments in the background condition. Table 7 provides a summary of the A.M. peak and P.M. peak hour intersection levels of service under the background scenario. Figure 6 and Figure 7 illustrate the A.M. and P.M. peak-hour background volumes. Appendix B includes the detailed calculation sheets. Marbella Project - ADEIR 14 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates TABLE 6 TRIP GENERATION APPROVED PROJECTS AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Size Units Percentage Trips Perc entage Trips Rate /o Rate /o In Out In Out In Out In Out Outlook Heights Phases I ~ II (Pacifica) Single-Family Detached Housin 30 d.u. .75 25 75 6 17 1.01 64 36 20 11 Tota 6 17 20 11 Office (Daly City) General Once Buildin 147,000 s.f. 1.56 88 12 201 28 1.49 17 83 37 182 Tota 201 28 37 182 Oakmont Vistas (South San Francisco) Single-Family Detached Housin 34 d.u. .9 25 75 8 23 1.21 64 36 27 15 Tofal 8 23 27 15 Oak Farms (South San Francisco) Single-Family Detached Housin 34 d.u. .75 25 75 7 19 1.01 64 36 22 12 Tota 7 19 22 12 Chesnut Creek (South San Francisco) Senior Housing Apartments 40 d.u .07 57 43 2 1 .1 60 40 2 2 Tota 2 1 2 2 Carter Park I (South San Francisco) Condominium 50 d.u. .44 17 83 4 19 .54 67 33 18 9 Tota 4 19 18 9 Park Place (South San Francisco) Single-Family Detached Housin 23 d.u. .75 25 75 4 13 1.01 64 36 15 8 Tofa 4 13 15 8 Aegis Assisted Living Facility (South San Francisco) Under Construction 71 rooms .19 74 16 10 4 .15 46 54 5 6 Tota 10 4 5 6 St. Augustine School 8< Church Expansion (South San Francisco) Schoo 365 1.0 59 41 214 125 .045 33 67 5 10 Tota 214 125 5 10 TOTA 456 249 151 255 Marbella Project - ADEIR 15 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates Source: ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 6"' Ed. 1997. TABLE 7 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS BACKGROUND SCENARIO A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR # INTERSECTION AvG. DELAY LOS AvG. DELAY LOS 1 Gellert BIvdlKing Dr* 19.2 C 27.6 D 2 Gellert BIvdlRowtree Wy* 12.3 B 17.2 C 3 Gellert BIvdlPac-N-Save/Orchard Supply Driveway 8.7 A 14.0 B 4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Entrance 6.4 A 8.5 A 5 Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd 40.4 D 36.4 D 6 Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr* 154.5 F 15.1 C 7 Westborough Blvd/Galway PI 23.9 C 14.1 B 8 Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center* 18.6 C 76.5 F Note: ' Unsgnalized intersection. Average Delay in seconds per vehicle. LOS: Level of Service. October 2, 2001 Marbella Project - ADEIR ~1 ~~ ~~ 1 3~ K~n9 ~c. 3 221 ~ Rowntree -Proposed Project Access Project Site O~ O~ryb ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 8, 1322 ~ ,//- 's7 7ti /1 ~, oo~ ry a xI s, ,s °~~ ~~~~ ? ~~ 1~1 ~ ~; /~ r ', { {: 72 c N SaveiOrchard ~~ ~4 ~ pa Hardware Driveway ~ ~ t~ {° I- ' ~ ~~ i 1; ~, rw w awi ~~ 2,J ~1t 54 ~, -~ ~ ao McDonalds/ ~ ~. 29 ~ 107 ~ ~ Westborough Center in AEGIS Assisted g Shopp Living Faciltity +~ ~~ o a' ~.. ~ 2 ~~ ,~ ~~~~ ~ 6 ~rg5 763 ~ ~ 178 ~ ~ 1!'~ `HBO ~ sus -~ ~ 2~ ~ c 46 U ... 'a E a O e~,,d. DKS Associates FIGURE 6 YEAR 2002 BACKGROUND VOLUMES A.M. PEAK HOUR ~o~ SSS~V1 s1~ ,e'~ ,~~s~ ~[ 1 COs Km9 Dr' 3AA ~ 206 Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O`~ ^,`O ^ n C~ ^~ ~~ ~ g ~ ~- 3~s 728 ~ Gs Eg ti s Z ~ r '' ,~ r ~~o a co 3 70 s~ '~ ~a'~~ a ~'~ / ' i f 1 ~ ~ o' ~ 't..123 d SuPPiY velOrchar ~, ~ ` 181 PacN Sa re Driveway ~ i-Iardwa +~-~ ;. I ~ J ~ ~ 1 - ~, w,J p : N ~ ^ y ,~~° 69 107', ,°~, o '~.. 97 tboro McDonalds/ ~ 150 Wes Center Sh°PP~ng AEGIS Assisted Living Faciltity t rn~ ~r ~ A2'~ °~gnB~va. ~ ~~1212~e51'0°r ?moo ~~ ~ r r 1660 ~ ~` ~~ 311 ~ I!'~ 8 - t 22 6 ~ 4s~ 836 ~ ~ 6 ZO ~ Ge//P~ 26~Q ~ %°, U ~ i .n DKS Associates FIGURE 7 YEAR 2002 BACKGROUND VOLUMES P.M. PEAK HOUR DKS Associates 1.5 PROJECT CONDITION This section evaluates background traffic conditions plus project-generated traffic estimated for the proposed project. The amount of traffic associated with a project is estimated using athree-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. Trip generation is the process of predicting the number of peak hour trips a proposed development would contribute to the roadways, and whether these trips would be entering or exiting the site. After the number of trips is determined, the distribution process projects the direction these trips use to approach and depart the site, from a regional perspective. Trip assignment involves determining which specific roadways a vehicle would use to travel between its origin and destination. Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed project was based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6~ Edition, 1997, as summarized in Table 8, for the AM Peak and PM Peak hours, respectively. Based on 281 multi-family dwelling units, the proposed project would generate an additional 124 trips (21 inbound, 103 outbound) during the A. M. peak hour and 152 trips (102 inbound, 50 outbound) during the P.M. peak hour. TABLE 8 TRIP GENERATION PROPOSED PROJECT Dail AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Size Units Rate Trips Rate Percentage /o Trips Rate Perc entage /o Trips In Out In Out In Out In Out Marbella Project Residentia Condominium 281 d.u. 5.86 1647 .44 17 83 21 103 .54 67 33 102 50 TOTA 21 103 102 50 Source: ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 6" Ed. 1997 Although the project sponsor is proposing an on-site shuttle program aimed at reducing weekday peak- hourtrips, the analysis in this report was based on the full complement of trip generation. This was due - to provide conservative analysis. Trip Distribution The directions of approach and departure for project trips were estimated based on existing travel patterns and the locations of complementary land uses. Figure 8 illustrates the trip distribution of the proposed project for the A.M. peak hour and Figure 9 illustrates the trip distribution of the proposed project for the P.M. peak hour, respectively. Marbella Project - ADEIR 19 October 2, 2001 °~o ^~ '~/ ~ 0 ~,-` ~° 7~i °° YGn9 Dr. ~~ o ,~o°I° ~- ° ~s~ ° ~ ~A° Rowntree WaY ~° o n° t~ ~ 0 0 0 I~% /: ~, ~` 3° ~ o 1 Pa SavelOrchard SuPP Y ay ~_ ~, Hard Drivew ware * `- 1 19% 62°I0 ~, o '' 1 ~° - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site ~ ~, o o~ 1 rn 0 McDonalds/ 1 ~ 5% Westborough ing Center O`. AEGIS Assisted Shopp ~ ~D Living Faciltity t 3 ~ °o C7 ~wa. See°r°u9r 2p / ti ~ psi s ~° °i° ~e ~ ~ ~o ° ~ ~g1 s, s ~ a ~ ~ X15% °I° I ~?~ - 20 0 n. Ce~~ ,, 3 20% -- e ~e~'' ~ 0 U a DKS Associates FIGI,RE 8 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION A.M. PEAK HOUR p\O 6 ,,~ O ~Oo ~~~o O ~o ° 1np°~ ° ~Gn9 Dc' I ~9~ o~ Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access L~ Project Site O~~ "` 970 10% °o ° °`Ps a /' ~5 ~O /.' /' f J- 0 1 ~'' ~" o , :a- ° .- z /o r ~~Lt 1. 37~ 4°h ~ ° ~a 1 ' N w o o` t`, 4°~01 t 0 / `~ 0 McDonalds/ 1 ~- 4% AEGIS Assisted Living Faciltity t ~ N o c 0 f'',. N gavelOrchard SuPPiY mare Driveway Center e~,,d. ~ ~L a a 3 ~o r.~ ~ ono A~oI° w~°- ~ ~, , ~ ~. o, a ~ ° ~~Q% ~ to / ~ _ - 1~0 o ~~q 0 DKS Associates FIGURE 9 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION P.M. PEAK HOUR DKS Associates Trip Assignment The directions of approach and departure for project trips were estimated based on existing roadway network and the locations of the proposed project access points, travel patterns and the locations of complementary land uses. The proportion of these trips that would travel through the study intersections was used for the intersection LOS analysis under the project condition. Figure 10 and Figure 11 illustrate the project trips at each of the study intersections for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively. Figure 12 and Figure 13 illustrate the project scenario traffic volumes at each of the study intersections for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively. Intersection operational levels of service along with their associated critical and average delays are summarized in Table 10. Appendix C includes the detailed level of service analysis sheets for the project scenario, including AM Peak and PM Peak. Marbella Project - ADEIR 22 October 2, 2001 ~6! ,~ ~`~OS tCrn9 Or. S ~2 ~r ~ ~9`- a '- f ~7 ~ ~O Rowntree Way ~~ i ~" 7 /•' 1 1' 1" SuPPiY hard 1 a:~ N SavelOrc ~.. 2 Pac N privewaY are ~s°~' Hardw 1 9 1 f: z o 0 - Proposed Project Access i ; 27." ~. ~ Project Site l N N-~ ~. a1 t N McDonalds/ ~ '(. a ~ Westborough ing Center O~• AEGIS Assisted Shopp ~ Living Faciltity ~m N~ ~s~- `mss des s` ~V- / ~ ~ 15 ~5 s n. 6i`a c~ ° ~ ~ o o DKS Associates FIGURE 11 PROJECT TRIPS P.M. PEAK HOUR ~~ ~~~^3 ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ r ~o~~ es Dr. 3 3 ~- 229 ~I Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access ~~ Project Site o~. o°jry ~~ ~~~ ~~~ 1326 ~ ~ 1g ~~ '~r aryh a s~ ~~ ~~~ r~~~s 1 ~~ 1~1 ~1 Q. r` /' I` 1,, 1' 72 N SaveiOrchard . .. _. ~~;._ ~ ~~ ~ Hardware Driveway ~~. ~.~ 20~ ~ 1 '. ~~ ! w J '' N ~~ `~": x778 ~t78 ~ ~ . 2,J '1t 54 ..~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ L 27 McDonalds/ 1 ,t'~07 AEGIS Assisted i Living Faciltity t o a' w~ 1683 ~ 46 o , U 'i3 E a O Center 131 ~ar~~va. ~s ~~ ~11~ ~estip~ro ~u t ~ ~ ~ ~eo J ~ s Zoo ~ ~~e 1921 ~ G~,ir e79 ~~a DKS Associates FIGURE 12 EXISTING PLUS APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT VOLUMES A.M. PEAK HOUR ~o~ ~.%~°~~ r~~~s2 ~s'~~ 'o pr. 311 1216 ~/ Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ti ~~ ~ ~ 3~6 ~Zz ~ ti '~ ss s~ h ~~ o~~ a a co 3 °a ss ~~ S`~- r ss8 ~I ~ 8i ~p1 ~I ~' /~ ~' '(„ 123 ca N ~_ 161 Pac ~~ 2,~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~.,~~ o 1= 1 w o.~ ~' ~' 73 o~ 107', N ~ Z.101 McDonalds/ `~ .150 AEGIS Assisted Living Faciltity ~, ~~ X1665 311 841 y 26 o U ~ .a E _~ O ~. N gavelOrchard SupPiy mare Driveway Center 3 ti ,~05 a'oy~a r 2~4 s~ ~V. 2AO ~ aZO~I 0~~a' 1~~ ~ X89 9~ 96, cep/e 7e~` a DKS Associates FIGURE 13 EXISTING PLUS APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT VOLUMES P.M. PEAK HOUR DKS Associates TABLE 10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS PROJECT SCENARIO A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR # INTERSECTION AvG• DELAY LOS AvG' DELAY LOS 1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr* 19.8 C 29.9 D 2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Wy* 12.4 B 18.5 C 3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save/Orchard Supply Driveway 12.3 B 15.9 B 4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Entrance 6.2 A 8.4 A 5 Westborough BIvdlGellert Blvd 42.2 D 37.0 D 6 Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr* 156.0 F 15.2 C 7 Westborough Blvd/Galway PI 23.9 C 14.1 B 8 Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center* 20.3 C 111.3 F Note: ' Unsignalized intersection. Average Delay in seconds per vehicle. LOS: Level of Service. Freeway Analysis Project-generated traffic would not change levels of service on regional routes of significance in the study area. The proposed project would increase I-280 traffic by 25 vehicles between SR-1 North and SR-1 South, which is equivalent to 0.2% percent of freeway capacity, during the PM peak hour in the peak direction. The proposed project would increase I-280 traffic by 25 vehicles between SR-1 South and San Bruno Avenue, which is equivalent to 0.2% percent of freeway capacity, during the PM peak hour in the peak direction. Within the study vicinity, I-280 would continue to function at an acceptable LOS E between SR-1 North and SR-1 South with the addition of project-generated traffic during the PM peak hour. Interstate-280 between SR-1 South and San Bruno Avenue would also continue to function at an acceptable LOS D with the addition ofproject-generated traffic during the PM peak hour. Project Access and Site Circulation The proposed project will have two public roadway connections to Gellert Boulevard; a fourth (westerly) leg of the signalized Pac 'N Save intersection would be added, and at aright-turn-in and right-tum-out intersection between the Rowntree Way and Pac 'N Save intersections (about 260 feet south of Marbella Project - ADEIR 27 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates Rowntree Way). An emergency vehicle access would also be provided at the south end of the -~` development connecting to the McDonald's- Aegis Assisted Living facility driveway. On-Site Circulation All streets within the Marbella planned unit development would be private. The project access connection to the signalized Gellert Boulevard/Pac 'N Save driveway intersection will be named Marbella Drive and will be 40 feet wide, curb to curb. This would allow striping of two lanes on the eastbound approach to Gellert Boulevard and at least at 16-foot-wide inbound lane. The single east- west intemal street (named Portofino Place north of Marbella Drive and San Remo Court south of Marbella Drive) would be 25 feet wide curb to curb, which would not allow any width for on- street parallel parking. Two 90-degree guest parking bays would be located along San Remo Court (providing a total of 10 spaces) and a single 90-degree parking bay would be provided at the north end of the site along Portofino Place (providing four spaces) while a larger 90-degree parking bay will be provided on the west side of the Marbella Drive/Portofino Place/San Remo Court intersection (providing eight spaces). Two garage and two apron spaces would be provided for each unit. Aprons for uphill lots would be 18 feet long while aprons for downhill lots will be 20 feet long. Grades on all intemal streets would be less than 3%, which would be well under the City's maximum 12% grade limit. The project site plan design reflects preliminary review by both the City Public Works and Fire departments. The overall project intemal design appears acceptable. If guest parking exceeds the on-site capacity, overflow vehicles would likely use parking in the commercial areas on the east side of Gellert Boulevard, as on-street parking would be prohibited on Gellert Boulevard. 1.6 CUMULATIVE CONDITION This section provides a discussion of potential projects that may adversely affect traffic service levels throughout the vicinity of the proposed project. The analysis in this report incorporated a detailed approved project list, which in tum provides a more conservative analysis of transportation impacts as more trips were added to the roadway system under this analysis. The 2010 a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were provided by the Subdivision Traffic Analysis, and were derived from the South San Francisco Amended EI Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan EIR and based on projections within the cities of Colma, Pacifica, Daly City and San Bruno. The trip generation of approved and planned projects is presented in Table 11. The approved/planned projects in the study area would generate an additional 273 trips (57 inbound, 216 outbound) during the A. M. peak hour and 353 trips (231 inbound, 122 outbound) during the P.M. peak hour. Trip distribution characteristics for the approved/planned projects were based upon existing traffic patterns observed at the study intersections; in the immediate project vicinity and analysis of existing turning movements at the study area intersections. Trips generated by the approved/planned projects were assigned to the local roadway network along the most logical paths. Marbella Project - ADEIR 28 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates - TABLE 11 TRIP GENERATION PENDING PROJECTS AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Size Units Rate Perc ~ntage Percentage Trips Trips Rate In Out In Out In Out In Out e.,., o. Single-Family Detached Housin 120 d.u. .75 25 75 23 67 1.01 64 36 78 43 Tota 23 67 78 43 Single-Family Detached Housin 75 d.u. .75 25 75 14 42 1.01 64 36 49 27 Tofa 14 42 49 27 n.,r., rati, - --, - - Condominium 288 d.u. .44 17 83 20 107 .54 67 33 104 52 Tota 20 107 104 52 TOTA 57 216 231 122 Source: ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 6"' Ed. 1997. Figure 14 and Figure 15 illustrate the cumulative scenario traffic volumes at each of the study intersections for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively. Table 12 provides a summary of the cumulative scenario intersection service levels for each of the peak periods analyzed. Appendix D includes the detailed calculation sheets for the intersection level of service analysis Marbella Project - ADEIR 29 October 2, 2001 oti ~%ti~,~~ ~~ `~SO~vi '~~~ r`t~o~s 88 K~n9 Dr. 35 ?39 ~- Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O~~ ~~ ~3 ^ ~m ryy ~ry ~ ~ ~ 91 1gp0 ~ ~ ~~ 8'` R /r yry ~0 o ss J 4 ~ ~~ ~1 IFS "~S ~~~~ ~: i / ' -' - w ~ '~.. 65 SupPiY ( w``~` O gp Pac N gavelOrchard - M 1 ~ ~ Hardware Driveway ~' ~ 201 ~1 t 6a , ~ N °~° cn I - ,, ~~ ~~ x818 161 ~ ~~ 25 60 ~, °' ~ A o '` 31 McDonalds/ j ~ 115 AEGIS Assisted i Living Faciltity w ~ yw 1770 -~ 45 ~ w N O ~I ~ ~g6 ~s r ~~1 ~~~~ t ,~~3 ~ 18~g0 ~- Center e~~a. ~~ j`90 ~ 9 9 C~'~/e ~e/-. a FIGURE 4~-- !y DKS Associates CUMULATIVE VOLUMES - A.M. PEAK HOUR ,~o ~%~~`'~ 4 ~ r `~97~V~ ` so1~ ~~ oos ~l ~o Df~ 1~~- 221 ~ Rowntree - - - Proposed Project Access Project Site O~ ~~(~^v ~j~ Z ~~28 0 6 '(~ 4g ~ 777 ti s ~ r~ ~ ~o ~~ iL ;' s8 ~ 9 Sl~ Y1 SSE Ic ~ 8~ 33 ~ ~5 ~,'., / ~ ~ 1 1 o N. '` 13 2 and SuPP~`1 { ~' ~` ~ 195 N SavelOrch Pac priveway 1 ~ ~. Hardware ~__19~ ~~ O ~ 1 22',w 1 p~ ~,.a t 79.? ~ " 117', o rn °' t 109 McDonalds/ ~ 160 Westboro Center AEGIS Assisted ~ ShopPin9 Living Faciltity t J ~ ~1 ~ A82 ou9 s ~1128~ ~e5lb°f ~ ~o °~~~' r ~ r 1746 ~ ~o 325 ? IG'~ ~O ~ 2y5J- 94 9 22 ~ Ge// 927 ~- ~ e7 25 ~ Q ~ U 'a E _T O 6~~d. DKS Associates FIGURC--~4~' IS CUMULATIVE VOLUMES - P.M. PEAK HOUR DKS Associates TABLE 12 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS CUMULATIVE SCENARIO A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION Avc• DELAY LOS AvG. DELAY LOS 1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr 22.0 C 36.1 E 2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Wy 12.8 B 20.2 C 3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save/Orchard Supply Driveway 12.5 B 15.9 B 4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Entrance 6.8 A 8.6 A 5 Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd 44.4 D 39.1 D 6 Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr 206.4 F 16.6 C 7 Westborough Blvd/Galway PI 24.8 C 14.5 B 8 Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center 22.5 C 171.0 F Note: ' Unsgnalized intersection. Average Delay in seconds per vehicle. LOS: Level of Service. 1.7 PROJECT ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN As per the City of South San Francisco's request, trip generation projections have been developed for an altemative project development that would contain 74 single-family residential units. As shown in Table 11, the project altemative would be expected to generate about 56 trips (14-inbound, 42- outbound) during the A.M. Peak hour and 75 trips (48-inbound, 27-outbound) during the P.M. Peak Hour. Table 12 provides a summary of the A.M. peak intersection service levels for each of the scenarios analyzed. Table 13 provides a summary of the P.M. peak intersection service levels for each of the scenarios analyzed. Appendices E-H, respectively, include the detailed calculation sheets for the intersection level of service analysis. Marbella Project - ADEIR 32 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates TABLE 11 TRIP GENERATION PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Dail AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Size Units Rate Trips Rate Percentage % Trips Rate Percentage /° Trips In Out In Out In Out In Out Marbella Project Single-Family Detache Housin 74 d.u. 9.57 708 .75 25 75 14 42 1.01 64 36 48 27 TOTA 14 42 48 27 Source: ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 6"' Ed. 1997 Marbella Project - ADEIR 33 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates 1.8 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Project Impacts The Marbella Project is projected to have impacts at two of the eight study intersections. The impacts and corresponding recommended mitigation measures are described below Impact 1: Degradation of LOS at Unsignalized Intersections. Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr Similar to the existing and background scenarios, the intersection of Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr would remain at LOS F during the A.M. peak hour. Although the addition of project traffic would not deteriorate the existing level of service, it would result in an increase in the average delay per vehicle at a currently deficient intersection. This constitutes a significant impact. Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway Similar to the existing and background scenarios, the intersection of Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway would remain at LOS F during the A.M. peak hour. Although the addition of project traffic would not deteriorate the existing level of service, it would result in an increase in the average delay per vehicle. This constitutes a significant impact. A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for the Gellert/Vllestborough Shopping Center unsignalized study intersections. Traffic signal warrants are standards that provide guidelines in the determination whether a traffic signal is needed. A traffic signal should not be installed if none of the warrants are met, since the installation of traffic signals may increase delays for the majority of through traffic and increase some types of accidents. If one or more warrants are met, a signal may be appropriate. The analysis was based on the standard Traffic Signal Warrants from the Caltrans Traffic Manual, Chapter 9. This study evaluated the Peak Hour Warrants for the a.m. and p.m. peak hour conditions. The Peak Hour Warrant is intended for applications where traffic conditions are such that for at least one hour of the day, the minor street suffers long delays in entering or crossing the major street. Signal warrants vary depending on whether the intersection is located in an urban or rural setting. For this report, the signal warrant analysis was conducted using the criteria for urban conditions. The unsignalized intersection of Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center meets the minimum peak hour warrant requirements for the a.m. and p.m., peak hour under the existing, background and project scenarios. Mitigation: Signalization at Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway is not recommended due to its proximity to the Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd and Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway intersections. A third signal would have a negative impact for traffic flows along Gellert Boulevard. For the Westborough Boulevard/Olympic Drive intersection, a third eastbound through-lane should be added to the approach to the intersection. This would only require striping the roadway and adding Marbella Project - ADEIR 34 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates bolts dots for vehicle chanellization. No new right-of-way would be needed to implement this mitigation-' measure. Significance after Mitigation: At Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr, the impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. At Gellert BIvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway, the existing deficiency would remain and this would be a significant and unavoidable impact. Impact 2• Conformity with County Parking Requirements (Residential Units). The proposed project would provide a total of 486 tenant parking spaces, 132 guest parking spaces for a total of 618 parking spaces within the project site. Based on San Mateo County General Development Standards for Residential Development -Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance), the number of parking spaces required for the project would be 632 spaces (281 units x 2.0 spaces/unit = 562 and 1 space per every four units = 281 units/4 = 70 spaces). The proposed project would provide a total of 618 parking spaces, which would result in a deficit of 14 parking spaces. This would be a significant impact. Mitigation: Fourteen additional parking spaces should be added to the project site. Significance after Mitigation: With the addition of fourteen parking spaces the impact would be reduced to aless-than-significant level. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative traffic would result in significant impacts at three of the eight study intersections. The impacts and recommended mitigation measures are described below. Impact 3• Degradation of LOS at Unsignalized Intersection. Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr and Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway Both of these intersections would continue to operate at LOS F during at least one of the peak hours, under the cumulative condition. It is recommended that the eastbound approach to the intersection of Westborough Blvd/Olympic Dr. be restriped to add a third through-lane, to accommodate peak hour cumulative plus project traffic. Gellert Blvd/King Drive Cumulative traffic would result in a significant impact at the intersection of Gellert Blvd/King Drive. The P.M. Peak hour intersection delay would increase by more than four seconds, and LOS E operations are expected in the P.M. peak-hour. This constitutes a significant impact. Mitigation: A peak-hour signal warrant analysis was performed at the Gellert/King-intersection. The intersection meets the Caltrans signal warrant criteria, and signalization of this intersection is the recommended mitigation measure. Implementation of this mitigation measure would require the City of South San Francisco to coordinate with the City of Daly City regarding the construction and operation of the traffic signal. There are two other possible mitigation measures, as follows: Marbella Project - ADEIR 35 October 2, 2001 DKS Associates • Remove on-street parking on the northbound approach to the intersection and restripe the northbound approach to add a second northbound left-tum lane within the exiting right-of-way, The intersection would remain afour-way STOP controlled intersection. The northbound leg of the intersection is in the City of South San Francisco.; • Remove on-street parking on the westbound approach to the intersection and restripe the westbound approach to have a separate through-lane and a separate right-tum lane within the exiting right-of-way. The intersection would remain afour-way STOP controlled intersection. The westbound leg of the intersection is in the City of Daly City, and would require approval from the City of Daly City prior to implementation. Significance after Mitigation: With the addition of a traffic signal at this intersection, or either of the roadway restriping improvements,the impact would be reduced to aless-than-significant level. Signal warrant analysis for the intersections of Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway and Gellert Blvd/King Drive are presented in Appendix I of this report. Impact 4: On-Street Parking Prohibition Site distances for motorists are currently compromised due to the topography along Gellert Boulevard Mitigation: Parking should be prohibited adjacent to the project site along Gellert Boulevard between the project's north access and the project north boundary. This would help maintain adequate sight lines for drivers turning from the north project site access. Significance After Mitigation: With the prohibition of on-street parking, the impact would be reduced to aless-than-significant level. Impact 5: Weaving and merge distance for vehicles on westbound Westborough Boulevard approaching Gellert Boulevard Vehicles exiting the Westborough Shopping Center onto westbound Westborough Boulevard currently have a short merge distance if they want to tum left onto southbound Gellert Boulevard. As a result, these vehicles have to weave across three lanes of traffic in a relatively short distance, creating a safety hazard. Mitigation: The westbound left-tum pocket on Westborough Boulevard at Gellert Boulevard should be lengthened so that it extends back to a point opposite the Westborough Shopping Center driveway. This mitigation measure would require the removal of a portion of the existing median island, but would not require any additional right-of-way. Significance After Mitigation: With the extension of the westbound left-tum pocket at the Westborough Blvd/Gellert Blvd intersection, the impact would be reduced to aless-than-significant level. Marbella Project - ADEIR 36 October 2, 2001 A.M. PEAK AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.631 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 90 55 130 320 25 30 280 220 70 175 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 90 55 130 320 25 30 280 220 70 175 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.24 0.76 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.11 1.06 0.83 0.41 1.03 0.56 Final Sat.: 352 463 297 391 776 61 52 488 412 175 450 254 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.36 0.45 0.45 0.63 0.62 0.58 0.44 0.42. 0.41 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 15.0 13.9 13.2 16.2 17.2 17.1 22.1 21.6 18.7 16.7 16.0 15.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.0 13.9 13.2 16.2 17.2 17.1 22.1 21.6 18.7 16.7 16.0 15.0 LOS by Move: B B B C C C C C C C C C ApproachDel: 14.1 16.9 20.4 15.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 14.1 16.9 20.4 15.9 LOS by Appr: B C C C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 205 0 0 600 10 15 0 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 205 0 0 600 10 15 0 80 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 33 223 0 0 652 11 16 0 87 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 33 223 0 0 652 11 16 0 87 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 663 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 834 xxxx 332 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 935 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 311 xxxx 670 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 935 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 302 xxxx 670 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 17.6 xxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * * * C * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * ` ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 xxxx.~cx ApproachLOS: * * B * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.267 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 175 40 95 585 0 0 0 0 70 0 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 175 40 95 585 0 0 0 0 70 0 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 2861 648 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1488 0 1615 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.08 Uniform Del: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.4 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 8.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 13.5 13.5 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 13.5 13.5 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.0 DesignQueue: 0 4 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.307 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.6 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 230 0 0 625 30 20 0 50 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 85 230 0 0 625 30 20 0 50 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3419 166 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.04 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.7 28.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.7 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.7 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 2 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.831 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.2 Optimal Cycle: 84 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 65 370 575 70 135 165 1730 20 175 685 125 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 65 370 575 70 135 165 1730 20 175 685 125 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5168 60 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.17 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.14 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.22 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.32 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.22 0.83 0.83 0.19 0.20 0.43 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.43 0.15 Uniform Del: 43.3 43.3 40.1 45.3 39.0 21.3 40.3 31.0 31.0 51.5 32.1 14.3 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.3 12.0 7.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 2.8 2.8 22.7 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 43.6 43.7 52.1 52.6 39.0 21.5 41.0 33.9 33.9 74.2 32.3 14.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 43.7 52.1 52.6 39.0 21.5 41.0 33.9 33.9 74.2 32.3 14.4 DesignQueue: 4 4 19 33 4 5 9 76 1 11 33 4 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Olympic~Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 121.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 1610 45 175 705 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 1610 45 175 705 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 1713 48 186 750 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 1713 48 186 750 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 880 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1761 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 360 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 360 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 121.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 121.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.682 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 23.6 Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R ~ L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 45 25 85 310 25 107 40 1260 5 15 605 85 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 45 25 85 310 25 107 40 1260 5 15 605 85 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.83 0.85 0.70 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1006 566 1615 1324 1805 1534 1805 3593 13 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.18 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.68 0.04 0.20 0.36 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.36 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.4 25.4 24.6 32.2 24.5 26.1 53.6 19.7 19.7 59.0 18.7 16.3 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 1.0 1.0 59.5 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 25.5 25.5 24.7 36.2 24.5 26.3 55.5 20.7 20.7 118.5 18.8 16.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 25.5 25.5 24.7 36.2 24.5 26.3 55.5 20.7 20.7 118.5 18.8 16.3 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 45 0 1 23 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 14:56:13 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh) 18.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 290 65 0 675 0 0 0 0 105 0 25 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 290 65 0 675 0 0 0- 0 105 0 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 315 71 0 734 0 0 0 0 114 0 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 315 71 0 734 0 0 0 0 114 0 27 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 717 xxxx 193 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 368 xxxx 822 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 368 xxxx 822 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 412 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.2 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA P.M. PEAK PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) t,t********,r**,r*,e,r,r:r,tt**,t****e,r,r***,r**~r*,r*****t,r***,r**,t,r+*,r*,c***,r.****,r*********t Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr r***,ex******,r***,t******~*,r*.,r***********t********+a+r*~t*******+**,r********+***** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.736 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------~I---------------II---------------II---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 200 370 85 35 260 55 30 140 200 75 295 160 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 200 370 85 35 260 55 30 140 200 75 295 160 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.65 0.35 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.28 1.12 0.60 Final Sat.: 352 610 142 310 552 118 61 312 406 111 445 251 ------------~---------------II---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.62 0.66 0.65 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.74 0.72 0.69 Crit Moves: **** ~ "*'`* "*** **** Delay/Veh: 26.9 27.8 26.8 15.0 22.6 22.1 21.8 21.8 20.0 32.4 30.7 27.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.9 27.8 26.8 15.0 22.6 22.1 21.8 21.8 20.0 32.4 30.7 27.5 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C C C D D D ApproachDel: 27.4 21.8 20.8 30.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 27.4 21.8 20.8 30.0 LOS by Appr: D C C D **,r**r*,e**,r*******r,r,r,r**,r*****,t***,r,r****,r+*+*,r**,r*,t*r*,r,r***t***,r**,r,t*:*,r*+vr+r*r,rr Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 625 0 0 520 15 30 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 70 625 0 0 520 15 30 0 40 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 76 679 0 0 565 16 33 0 43 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 76 679 0 0 565 16 33 0 43 0 0 0 ------------~----------=----~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 582 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1065 xxxx 291 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1003 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx 712 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1003 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 208 xxxx 712 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25.5 xxxx 10.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.527 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.8 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 575 70 200 360 0 0 0 0 175 0 120 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 575 70 -200 360 0 0 0 0 175 0 120 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3167 385 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1461 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00.0.37 0.37 0.23 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.17 Uniform Del: 0.0 14.6 14.6 20.3 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 9.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.0 15.0 21.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 9.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.0 15.0 21.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 9.1 DesignQueue: 0 14 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 *********************************************+r********************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway *********************************,r*******************************************:** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.319 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 635 0 0 500 35 70 0 125 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 635 0 0 500 35 70 0 125 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3340 234 1465 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.5 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 8.6 22.2 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 9 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.767 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.7 Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~------------`--~I---------------~ Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 45 85 180 450 105 215 205 785 20 260 1655 410 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 45 85 180 450 105 215 205 785 20 260 1655 410 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 81B 21 271 1724 427 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 818 21 271 1724 427 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 818 21 271 1724 427 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.92 0.08 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5067 131 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.33 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.33 0.15 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.43 0.61 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.31 0.77 0.77 0.34 0.42 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.77 0.43 Uniform Del: 44.3 45.3 48.9 46.9 43.1 31.1 48.8 34.7 34.7 36.3 28.8 12.3 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.6 13.5 4.8 0.1 0.5 12.1 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.6 0.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.6 45.9 62.4 51.7 43.2 31.7 60.8 35.0 35.0 37.3 30.5 12.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.6 45.9 62.4 51.7 43.2 31.7 60.8 35.0 35.0 37.3 30.5 12.6 DesignQueue: 3 5 11 27 6 10 12 40 1 13 71 12 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 805 25 305 1610 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 805 25 305 1610 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 856 27 324 1713 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 856 27 324 1713 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 441 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 883 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 14.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 14.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.503 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2 Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 35 125 15 35 45 670 5 65 1175 370 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 35 125 15 35 45 670 5 65 1175 370 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1805 1534 1805 3581 25 1805 3010 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.35 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.50 0.05 0.13 0.50 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.50 0.35 Uniform Del: 40.3 40.3 29.8 44.0 40.3 40.9 55.3 10.7 10.7 48.4 8.9 7.7 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.3 40.3 29.8 45.5 40.3 41.0 59.5 10.8 10.8 49.3 9.1 7.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 40.3 29.8 45.5 40.3 41.0 59.5 10.8 10.8 49.3 9.1 7.9 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 7 1 2 3 19 0 4 28 9 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:00:50 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/westborough Shopping Center Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh): 64.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 635 65 0 625 0 0 0 0 145 0 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 635 65 0 625 0 0 0 0 145 0 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 690 71 0 679 0 0 0 0 158 0 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 690 71 0 679 0 0 0 0 158 0 103 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1065 xxxx 380 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx 623 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx 623 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 297 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 64.4 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 64.4 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS BACKGROUND SCENARIO A.M. PEAK AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***********************************+***,r*****+r********************************** Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.684 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 93 56 133 327 30 33 303 227 71 199 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 93 56 133 327 30 33 303 227 71 199 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.25 0.75 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 340 450 283 381 743 70 53 488 390 161 465 235 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.48 0.47 0.68 0.67 0.63 0.48 0.46 0.45 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 15.6 14.5 13.8 17.1 18.5 18.3 25.4 24.7 21.2 18.1 17.3 16.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.6 14.5 13.8 17.1 18.5 18.3 25.4 24.7 21.2 18.1 17.3 16.3 LOS by Move: C B B C C C D C C C C C ApproachDel: 14.7 18.1 23.3 17.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 14.7 18.1 23.3 17.2 LOS by Appr: B C C C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AP~1 Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/ROwtree Way Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 211 0 0 615 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 211 0 0 615 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 34 229 0 0 668 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 34 229 0 0 668 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 679 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 856 xxxx 340 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 922 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 301 xxxx 662 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 922 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 292 xxxx 662 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.0 xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Traffix 7.1.0607 {c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.273 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 8.7 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 161 41 97 597 0 0 0 0 72 0 61 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 181 41 97 597 0 0 0 0 72 0 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 2856 652 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1486 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.30 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.08 Uniform Del: 0.0 13.3 13.3 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 8.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.1 DesignQueue: 0 4 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.308 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.4 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 238 0 0 636 33 21 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 238 0 0 636 33 21 0 54 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adjs. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3407 178 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 27.9 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 28.7 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 28.7 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 2 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.859 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 40.4 Optimal Cycle: 94 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T -. R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 67 380 589 70 138 166 1797 27 178 732 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 67 380 589 70 138 166 1797 27 178 732 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 74 70 396 614 73 144 173 1672 28 185 763 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 70 396 614 73 144 173 1872 28 185 763 128 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 70 396 614 73 144 173 1872 28 185 763 128 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5151 77 1805 5187 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.18 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.15 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.42 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.33 0.54 Volume/Cap: 0.25 0.22 0.86 0.86 0.19 0.21 0.45 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.45 0.15 Uniform Del: 43.5 43.3 40.6 45.8 39.2 22.1 41.1 31.4 31.4 51.9 31.6 13.9 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.4 14.9 9.3 0.0 0.2 0.8 3.6 3.6 27.6 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 43.9 43.7 55.5 55.1 39.2 22.2 41.9 35.0 35.0 79.4 31.8 14.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.9 43.7 55.5 55.1 39.2 22.2 41.9 35.0 35.0 79.4 31.8 14.0 DesignQueue: 4 4 20 34 4 6 9 79 1 11 35 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 154.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F *****,t*:**********+***********************************:************************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1679 46 178 763 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1679 46 178 763 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1786 49 189 812 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1786 49 189 812 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 918 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1835 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 278 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 337 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 278 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 337 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 154.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 28.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: 154.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) •***,r*.***,r,r,r*,r**,r#*,r+****+,r**,r***,r*#**********,r+,r+*,r**,r**++,r.,r,r****.+****#**,r** Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd ***********+.*,r*****,r,r,r#*****,r,r**+**,r*,r*,r,r,r**,r**,r*t**************,r*****,r,r**,r****. Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.710 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ******,r*,r***,r,r,r*,r,r*,r,r***,r***,r,r*,r**,r***,r,r*+**+***+**********,r*,r***,e**,r*+**,r****,r* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1322 7 15 661 87 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1322 7 15 661 87 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.69 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1024 532 1615 1311 1805 1534 1805 3589 18 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.19 0.06 Crit Moves: **** '`*"`* **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.71 0.04 0.21 0.39 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.39 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.8 25.8 25.0 33.0 24.9 26.5 54.0 19.8 19.8 59.0 18.5 15.8 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 2.2 1.2 1.2 70.5 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 25.9 25.9 25.1 37.9 24.9 26.7 56.2 21.0 21.0 129.5 18.7 15.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 25.9 25.9 25.1 37.9 24.9 26.7 56.2 21.0 21.0 129.5 18.7 15.9 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 47 0 1 25 3 ******+**,r*********+r********,r****:********,r*,r****++****,r**:*,r*****:*,r******,r**** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DFCS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:05:05 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh) 18.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 290 66 0 690 0 0 0 0 107 0 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 0 290 66 0 690 0 0 0 0 107 0 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 315 72 0 750 0 0 0 0 116 0 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 315 72 0 750 0 0 0 0 116 0 28 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 193 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 364 xxxx 822 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 364 xxxx 822 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 406 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.6 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.6 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA P.M. PEAK 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.765 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.6 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 205 375 87 36 266 56 31 144 206 77 303 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 205 375 87 36 266 56 31 144 206 77 303 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.65 0.35 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.28 1.12 0.60 Final Sat.: 346 597 141 304 541 116 60 308 400 110 439 246 ------------I---------------~~---------------I~---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.64 0.68 0.67 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.51 0.56 0.76 0.75 0.72 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 28.9 29.8 28.6 15.4 23.8 23.3 23.0 23.0 21.2 35.3 33.3 29.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 29.8 28.6 15.4 23.8 23.3 23.0 23.0 21.2 35.3 33.3 29.8 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C C C E D D ApproachDel: 29.4 22.9 22.1 32.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 29.4 22.9 22.1 32.5 LOS by Appr: D C C D Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 637 0 0 534 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 637 0 0 534 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 77 692 0 0 580 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 77 692 0 0 580 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 597 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1089 xxxx 298 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 990 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 213 xxxx 704 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 990 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 200 xxxx 704 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 26.4 xxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x'c'c'c 'oc'c'c x'cx'cx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd//Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.0 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Sound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 585 71 204 369 0 0 0 0 181 0 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 585 71 204 369 0 0 0 0 181 0 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 636 77 222 401 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 636 77 222 401 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 636 77 222 401 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3169 384 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1461 0 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.17 Uniform Del: 0.0 14.8 14.8 20.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 0.0 8.9 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.2 15.2 21.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 9.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.2 15.2 21.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 9.0 DesignQueue: 0 14 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.330 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.5 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: p+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 650 0 0 512 38 69 0 107 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 650 0 0 512 38 69 0 107 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3329 245 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 22.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 21.7 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 21.7 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 10 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd ********************************************:**********************************,r Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.790 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 36.4 Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Znclude Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 87 184 442 107 220 225 835 20 272 1705 421 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 87 184 442 107 220 225 835 20 272 1705 --421 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 48 91 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 91 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 48 91 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5095 123 1805 5187 1615 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.13 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.34 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.33 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.43 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.32 0.79 0.79 0.36 0.43 0.79 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.79 0.45 Uniform Del: 44.5 45.5 49.1 47.8 44.1 31.2 48.3 34.4 34.4 36.3 29.3 13.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.6 15.8 .5.9 0.1 0.5 13.3 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.0 0.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.8 46.1 65.0 53.6 44.2 31.7 61.6 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.2 13.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.8 46.1 65.0 53.6 44.2 31.7 61.6 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.2 13.3 DesignQueue: 3 5 11 26 6 11 14 42 1 14 73 12 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 ------------I---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 836 26 311 1660 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 836 26 311 1660 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 889 28 331 1766 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 889 28 331 1766 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 459 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 917 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 15.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 15.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Galway Pl/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.519 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.1 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 699 5 66 1218 376 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 699 5 66 1218 376 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.:. 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~I---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1805 1534 1805 3582 24 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.36 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.52 0.05 0.14 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.52 0.36 Uniform Del: 40.6 40.6 30.2 44.4 40.6 41.2 55.4 10.6 10.6 48.7 8.9 7.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.2 5.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.6 40.6 30.3 46.2 40.6 41.4 60.4 10.6 10.6 49.6 9.1 7.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.6 40.6 30.3 46.2 40.6 41.4 60.4 10.6 10.6 49.6 9.1 7.8 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 20 0 4 29 9 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND, CA 2002 PM BC Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:12:40 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shooping Center Driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 76.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 655 68 0 619 0 0 0 0 150 0 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 655 68 0 619 0 0 0 0 150 0 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 712 74 0 673 0 0 0 0 163 0 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 712 74 0 673 0 0 0 0 163 0 105 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1085 xxxx 393 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 214 xxxx 612 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 214 xxxx 612 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 288 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 76.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 76.5 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAiCLAND,CA APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS PROJECT SCENARIO A.M. PEAK AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.698 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 103 63 133 330 30 33 303 229 73 199 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 85 103 63 133 330 30 33 303 229 73 199 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 92 112 68 145 359 33 36 329 249 79 216 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 112 68 145 359 33 36 329 249 79 216 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 92 112 68 145 359 33 36 329 249 79 216 105 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.24 0.76 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 338 446 283 374 731 68 52 478 386 162 455 229 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.39 0.49 0.49 0.70 0.69 0.65 0.49 0.47 0.46 Crit Moves- **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 16.1 15.0 14.3 17.4 19.1 18.9 26.5 25.7 22.0 18.6 17.8 16.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 16.1 15.0 14.3 17.4 19.1 18.9 26.5 25.7 22.0 18.6 17.8 16.8 LOS by Move: C C B C C C D D C C C C ApproachDel: 15.2 18.7 24.3 17.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 15.2 18.7 24.3 17.7 LOS by Appr: C C C C ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 GellertBlvd/Rowtree Way ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 33 236 0 0 522 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 33 236 0 0 622 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 36 257 0 0 676 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 36 257 0 0 676 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 687 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 882 xxxx 343 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 916 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 290 xxxx 658 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 916 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 281 xxxx 658 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.6 xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * * * C * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x~xx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.4 ~x~x ApproachLOS: * * B * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *******************************************,r******************.******.********** Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.328 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: B **************:******************,r********************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 183 41 102 611 3 20 0 64 72 0 61 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 12 183 41 102 611 3 20 0 64 72 0 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 13 199 45 111 664 3 22 0 70 78 0 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 199 45 111 664 3 22 0 70 78 0 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 199 45 111 664 3 22 0 70 78 0 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 2862 647 1805 3590 16 1809 0 1615 1809 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.56 0.56 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.10 Uniform Del: 28.9 15.3 15.3 16.8 7.0 7.0 22.9 0.0 23.6 23.6 0.0 11.0 IncremntDel: 4.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 33.7 15.4 15.4 17.0 7.1 7.1 23.0 0.0 24.5 24.5 0.0~ 11.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 33.7 15.4 15.4 17.0 7.1 7.1 23.0 0.0 24.5 24.5 0.0 11.1 DesignQueue: 0 5 1 3 10 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) **********,r**************:***************************************************:** Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDOnald's Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.336 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.2 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~I---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 252 0 0 712 35 21 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 252 0 0 712 35 21 0 54 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PFIF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 85 274 0 0 774 38 23 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 274 0 0 774 38 23 0 59 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 85 274 0 0 774 38 23 0 59 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3417 168 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.04 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.19 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 23.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.1 4.1 28.1 0.0 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 24.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.2 28.9 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.2 28.9 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 2 0 0 9 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.878 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 42.2 Optimal Cycle: 103 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min . Green : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 68 380 647 73 153 200 1797 27 178 732 131 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 68 380 647 73 153 200 1797 27 178 732 131 User-Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 74 71 396 674 76 159 208 1872 28 185 763 136 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 71 396 674 76 159 208 1872 28 185 763 136 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 71 396 674 76 159 208 1872 28 185 763 136 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0_.04 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5151 77 1805 5187 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.20 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.15 0.08 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.16 0.28 0.22 0.22 0.46 0.23 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.30 0.52 Volume/Cap: 0.25 0.23 0.88 0.88 0.19 0.22 0.49 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.49 0.16 Uniform Del: 43.9 43.7 41.3 45.0 37.7 19.7 40.0 32.4 32.4 52.2 34.6 14.9 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.4 17.6 10.3 0.0 0.1 0.9 4.5 4.5 31.5 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.3 44.1 58.9 55.3 37.8 19.9 40.9 36.9 36.9 83.7 34.8 15.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.3 44.1 58.9 55.3 37.8 19.9 40.9 36.9 36.9 83.7 34.8 15.0 DesignQueue: 4 4 20 37 4 6 11 80 1 11 37 4 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 - -- - -Page-8_1 --------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 156.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1683 46 178 778 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1683 46 178 778 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1790 49 189 828 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1790 49 189 828 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx ~'~ xxxxx ~~ xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 920 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1839 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 335 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 335 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------f~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 156.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ 28'8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * F * * * * * * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 156.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ~~ ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.712 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1326 7 15 676 87 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1326 7 15 676 87 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94. 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1411 7 16 719 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1411 7 16 719 93 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1411 7 16 719 93 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.69 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1024 532 1615 1311 1805 1534 1805 3589 iB 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: . Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.20 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.71 0.04 0.21 0.40 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.40 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.9 25.9 25.1 33.0 24.9 26.6 54.2 19.8 19.8 59.0 18.5 15.7 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 2.3 1.2 1.2 71.1 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.0 26.0 25.2 38.1 24.9 26.7 56.5 21.0 21.0 130.1 18.6 15.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.0 26.0 25.2 38.1 24.9 26.7 56.5 21.0 21.0 130.1 18.6 15.8 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 47 0 1 25 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:47:04 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Drivewaytr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 303 69 0 766 0 0 0 0 107 0 27 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 303 69 0 766 0 0 0 0 107 0 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 329 75 0 833 0 0 0 0 116 0 29 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 329 75 0 833 0 0 0 0 116 0 29 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 783 xxxx 202 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 335 xxxx 811 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 335 xxxx 811 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 380 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 20.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 20.3 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA P.M. PEAK 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.790 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.9 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 210 385 92 36 277 56 31 144 218 83 303 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 210 385 92 36 277 56 31 144 218 83 303 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 228 418 100 39 301 61 34 157 237 90 329 177 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 228 418 100 39 301 61 34 157 237 90 329 177 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 228 418 100 39 301 61 34 157 237 90 329 177 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.66 0.34 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.30 1.11 0.59 Final Sat.: 339 583 142 298 534 110 58 305 394 114 426 238 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.67 0.72 0.71 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.59 0.51 0.60 0.79 0.77 0.74 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 31.2 32.9 31.5 15.7 25.6 25.0 24.6 24.6 23.3 38.4 36.1 32.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 31.2 32.9 31.5 15.7 25.6 25.0 24.6 24.6 23.3 38.4 36.1 32.2 LOS by Move: D D D C D D C C C E E D ApproachDel: 32.2 24.6 23.9 35.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 32.2 24.6 23.9 35.3 LOS by Appr: D C C E Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way ***************************:*******************,r******************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 81 658 0 0 563 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 81 658 0 0 563 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 88 715 0 0 612 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 88 715 0 0 612 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 628 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1154 xxxx 314 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 963 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 194 xxxx 688 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 963 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 180 xxxx 688 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 29.4 xxxx 10.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DICS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.533 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 15.9 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 595 71 206 374 8 19 2 22 161 2 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 595 71 206 374 8 19 2 22 181 2 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 65 647 77 224 407 9 21 2 24 197 2 134 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 65 647 77 224 407 9 21 2 24 197 2 134 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 65 647 77 224 407 9 21 2 24 197 2 134 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.79 0.21 1.00 1.96 0.04 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3174 378 1805 3521 78 1658 158 1615 1793 18 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.12 .0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.47 0.47 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.44 Volume/Cap: 0.25 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.25 0.25 0.45 0.45 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.19 Uniform Del: 22.7 14.4 14.4 20.1 9.5 9.5 28.7 26.7 28.8 21.2 21.2 10.3 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.1 0.1 6.3 6.3 11.7 1.5 1.5 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.2 14.8 14.8 21.5 9.6 9.6 35.0 35.0 40.5 22.7 22.7 10.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.2 14.8 '14.8 21.5 9.6 9.6 35.0 35.0 40.5 22.7 22.7 10.4 DesignQueue: 2 14 2 6 7 0 1 0 1 5 0 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DICS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) **********************+**,t*********,t**************************,t*****,t*****,r****,r Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway ***************************************,r******,r************:******************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.343 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.4 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ************************************,r****#*************************,r************ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 716 0 0 538 40 73 0 107 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 716 0 0 538 40 73 0 107 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 111 778 0 0 585 43 79 0 116 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 778 0 0 585 43 79 0 116 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 111 778 0 0 585 43 79 0 116 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3329 245 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.5 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 8.6 22.5 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 10 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 ************,r**,r*********************************************,+*****:***:******** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.806 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 37.0 Optimal Cycle: 77 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 92 184 462 108 225 240 835 20 272 1705 463 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 92 184 462 108 225 240 835 20 272 1705 463 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 48 96 192 481 113 234 250 870 21 283 1776 482 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 96 192 481 113 234 250 870 21 283 1776 482 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 48 96 192 481 113 234 250 870 21 283 1776 482 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5095 123 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.34 0.30 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.42 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.34 0.81 0.81 0.36 0.42 0.81 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.81 0.50 Uniform Del: 44.8 45.9 49.5 47.6 43.7 30.2 47.9 34.4 34.4 36.4 30.2 13.8 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.7 17.9 6.5 0.1 0.5 14.3 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.3 0.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 45.1 46.7 67.4 54.1 43.8 30.7 62.1 34.8 34.8 37.7 32.5 14.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.1 46.7 67.4 54.1 43.8 30.7 62.1 34.8 34.8 37.7 32.5 14.2 DesignQueue: 3 6 11 27 6 11 14 42 1 14 74 14 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********************************t********************************************** Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 841 26 311 1665 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 841 26 311 1665 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 895 28 331 1771 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 895 28 331 1771 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 461 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 922 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 553 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 749 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 553 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 749 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 15.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * : ApproachDel: 15.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.521 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.1 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 714 5 66 1223 376 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 714 5 66 1223 376 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Ob 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 760 5 70 1301 400 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 760 5 70 1301 400 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 760 5 70 1301 400 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1805 1534 1805 3583 24 1805 3610 1615 ------------I---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.36 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.52 0.05 0.14 0.52 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.52 0.36 Uniform Del: 40.6 40.6 30.5 44.4 40.6 41.3 55.4 10.5 10.5 48.9 8.9 7.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.2 5.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.7 40.7 30.5 46.3 40.6 41.4 60.6 10.6 10.6 49.9 9.1 7.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh:~ 40.7 40.7 30.5 46.3 40.6 41.4 60.6 10.6 10.6 49.9 9.1 7.8 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 20 0 4 29 9 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:43:05 Page 10-1 ' Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh): 113.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 717 69 0 645 0 0 0 0 150 0 101 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 717 69 0 645 0 0 0 0 150 0 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 779 75 0 701 0 0 0 0 163 0 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 779 75 0 701 0 0 0 0 163 0 110 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1167 xxxx 427 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 190 xxxx 581 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 190 xxxx 581 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 260 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 111 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 111.3 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA APPENDIX D LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS CUMULATIVE SCENARIO A.M. PEAx AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.745 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.0 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C ***************+***************************,r,r*********************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 88 108 65 139 350 32 35 315 239 75 210 102 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 88 108 65 139 350 32 35 315 239 75 210 102 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 96 117 71 151 380 35 38. 342 260 82 228 111 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 96 117 71 151 380 35 38 342 260 82 228 111 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 96 117 71 151 380 35 38 342 260 82 228 111 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.24 0.76 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 328 432 273 365 711 66 51 465 376 155 445 224 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.27 0.26 0.41 0.53 0.53 0.75 0.73 0.69 0.53 0.51 0.49 Crit Moves: **** **** **** *'** Delay/Veh: 17.0 15.8 15.0 18.5 21.0 20.8 30.7 29.7 25.0 20.2 19.3 18.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.0 15.8 15.0 18.5 21.0 20.8 30.7 29.7 25.0 20.2 19.3 18.2 LOS by Move: C C C C C C D D D C C C ApproachDel: 16.0 20.3 27.8 19.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 16.0 20.3 27.8 19.2 LOS by Appr: C C D C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 245 0 0 654 11 16 0 85 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 245 0 0 654 11 16 0 85 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 38 266 0 0 711 12 17 0 92 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 38 266 0 0 711 12 17 0 92 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 723 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 926 xxxx 361 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 889 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 271 xxxx 641 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 889 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 262 xxxx 641 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 19.7 xxxx 11.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * B * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.342 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.5 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: B ******:*******************************************************a***************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 187 45 110 634 3 20 0 64 80 0 65 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 12 187 45 110 634 3 20 0 64 80 0 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 13 203 49 120 689 3 22 0 70 87 0 71 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 203 49 120 689 3 22 0 70 87 0 71 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 203 49 120 689 3 22 0 70 87 0 71 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 2824 682 1805 3591 16 1809 0 1615 1809 0 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.56 0.56 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.14 0.00 0.42 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.10 Uniform Del: 29.0 15.7 15.7 16.7 7.1 7.1 23.2 0.0 23.9 23.3 0.0 10.5 IncremntDel: 5.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 34.3 15.8 15.8 16.9 7.2 7.2 23.3 0.0 24.9 24.1 0.0 10.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 34.3 15.8 15.8 16.9 7.2 7.2 23.3 0.0 24.9 24.1 0.0 10.6 DesignQueue: 0 5 1 3 11 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.363 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.8 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 254 0 0 745 37 25 0 60 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 254 0 0 745 37 25 0 60 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 -0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 103 276 0 0 810 40 27 0 65 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 276 0 0 810 40 27 0 65 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 103 276 0 0 810 40 27 0 65 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3416 169 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.04 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.23 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.7 27.9 0.0 20.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.9 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.9 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 2 0 0 10 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.915 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 44.4 Optimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 74 390 675 76 159 173 1887 30 181 766 141 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 74 390 675 76 159 173 1887 30 181 766 141 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 77 77 406 703 79 166 180 1966 31 189 798 147 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced col: 77 77 406 703 79 166 180 1966 31 189 798 147 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 77 77 406 703 79 166 180 1966 31 189 798 147 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5147 81 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.20 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.15 0.09 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.22 0.22 0.43 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.11 0.32 0.55 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.25 0.91 0.91 0.20 0.24 0.47 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.47 0.17 Uniform Del: 44.2 44.1 42.1 45.4 37.8 21.6 41.8 32.9 32.9 52.5 32.4 13.5 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.4 23.3 14.2 0.0 0.2 0.9 6.5 6.5 39.6 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.7 44.5 65.5 59.6 37.8 21.7 42.7 39.4 39.4 92.2 32.6 13.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.7 44.5 65.5 59.6 37.8 21.7 42.7 39.4 39.4 92.2 32.6 13.6 DesignQueue: 4 4 21 38 4 6 10 84 1 11 37 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd Average Delay (sec/veh): 206.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 320 0 0 0 0 1770 46 181 818 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 320 0 0 0 0 1770 46 181 818 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 1883 49 193 870 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 1883 49 193 870 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 966 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1932 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 258 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 258 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 206.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 34.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 206.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd x*****,r***********************************:*************+r***************+*#***** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.749 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.8 Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 27 90 325 27 113 45 1400 8 17 710 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 53 27 90 325 27 113 45 1400 8 17 710 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1489 9 18 755 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1489 9 18 755 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1489 9 18 755 97 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.85 0.68 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1018 527 1615 1294 1805 1534 1805 3585 22 1805 3610 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.27 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.21 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.75 0.04 0.22 0.42 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.42 0.12 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 25.3 33.9 25.2 26.9 54.0 20.4 20.4 59.0 18.7 15.7 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.7 0.0 0.2 2.4 1.6 1.6 79.7 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.4 26.4 25.4 40.5 25.2 27.1 56.4 22.0 22.0 138.7 18.8 15.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 26.4 26.4 25.4 40.5 25.2 27.1 56.4 22.0 22.0 138.7 18.8 15.8 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 16 1 5 3 49 0 1 26 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:49:26 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvdt/westborough Shopping Center Driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 318 73 0 805 0 0 0 0 115 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 318 73 0 805 0 0 0 0 115 0 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 346 79 0 875 0 0 0 0 125 0 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 346 79 0 875 0 0 0 0 125 0 34 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 823 xxxx 212 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 316 xxxx 799 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 316 xxxx 799 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x:cxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 362 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 22.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 22.5 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA P.M. PEAK 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert Blvd/King Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.862 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 36.1 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: E *Yr****it t4 tt*t!***'*****~t********************tt****~Y*************************it***~k#*** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 220 400 95 40 291 60 35 155 227 86 325 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 220 400 95 40 291 60 35 155 227 86 325 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 239 435 103 43 316 65 38 168 247 93 353 185 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 239 435 103 43 316 65 38 168 247 93 353 185 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 239 435 103 43 316 65 38 168 247 93 353 185 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.66 0.34 0.17 0.83 1.00 0.29 1.12 0.59 Final Sat.: 327 561 135 287 512 107 59 292 379 108 418 227 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.73 0.78 0.76 0.15 0.62 0.61 0.65 0.58 0.65 0.86 0.84 0.82 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 37.1 39.7 37.9 16.6 29.5 28.7 28.4 28.4 26.6 49.1 46.0 40.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 37.1 39.7 37.9 16.6 29.5 28.7 28.4 28.4 26.6 49.1 46.0 40.6 LOS by Move: E E E C D D D D D E E E ApproachDel: 38.7 28.1 27.5 44.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 38.7 28.1 27.5 44.9 LOS by Appr: E D D E ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert Blvd/Rowtree Way Average Delay (sec/veh) 20.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 87 686 0 0 589 15 33 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 87 686 0 0 589 15 33 0 45 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 95 746 0 0 640 16 36 0 49 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 95 746 0 0 640 16 36 0 49 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------I~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 657 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1210 xxxx 328 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 941 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 178 xxxx 673 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 941 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 164 xxxx 673 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 33.0 xxxx 10.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 20.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Gellert Blvd/Pac-N-Save-Orchard Supply Driveway Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.560 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.9 Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 625 75 217 401 8 19 2 22 195 2 130 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 625 75 217 401 8 19 2 22 195 2 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 65 679 82 236 436 9 21 2 24 212 2 141 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 65 679 82 236 436 9 21 2 24 212 2 141 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 65 679 82 236 436 9 21 2 24 212 2 141 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.96 0.04 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.99 0.~1 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3169 383 1805 3526 73 1658 158 1615 1794 17 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.44 Volume/Cap: 0.26 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.26 0.26 0.56 0.56 0.09 0.56 0.56 0.20 Uniform Del: 23.1 14.5 14.5 20.3 9.4 9.4 29.0 29.0 21.4 21.2 21.2 10.1 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.5 0.5 1.7 0.1 0.1 16.3 16.3 0.2 1.9 1.9 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.6 15.1 15.1 22.0 9.4 9.4 45.3 45.3 21.6 23.0 23.0 10.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.6 15.1 15.1 22.0 9.4 9.4 45.3 45.3 21.6 23.0 23.0 10.3 DesignQueue: 2 15 2 6 8 0 1 0 1 6 0 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert Blvd/McDonald's Driveway ****************************************,t*************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.369 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 110 746 0 0 574 45 79 0 117 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 110 746 0 0 574 45 79 0 117 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 120 811 0 0 624 49 86 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 120 811 0 0 624 49 86 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 120 811 0 0 624 49 86 0 127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3310 260 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 8.9 22.5 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 23.5 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 23.5 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 9 0 0 11 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.851 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.1 Optimal Cycle: 91 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 100 200 500 111 240 250 905 22 280 1777 482 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 100 200 500 111 240 250 905 22 280 1777 482 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 51 104 208 521 116 250 260 943 23 292 1851 502 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 104 208 521 116 250 260 943 23 292 1851 502 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 51 104 208 521 116 250 260 943 23 292 1851 502 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5094 124 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.36 0.31 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.35 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.42 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.19 0.36 0.85 0.85 0.36 0.45 0.85 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.65 0.52 Uniform Del: 44.5 45.7 49.6 47.7 43.3 30.4 46.5 34.7 34.7 37.6 31.5 14.1 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.8 23.7 9.2 0.1 0.6 19.8 0.6 0.6 1.9 3.4 0.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.8 46.5 73.3 57.0 43.4 30.9 68.3 35.3 35.3 39.7 34.9 14.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.8 46.5 73.3 57.0 43.4 30.9 68.3 35.3 35.3 39.7 34.9 14.6 DesignQueue: 3 6 12 30 6 11 15 45 1 15 78 14 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Olympic Dr/Westborough Blvd ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 927 26 325 1746 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 927 26 325 1746 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 986 28 346 1857 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 986 28 346 1857 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 507 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1014 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 516 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 692 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 516 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 692 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 16.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * C * * * * * * C * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 16.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Galway P1/Westborough Blvd Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.551 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.5 Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 11 38 137 16 38 48 777 6 70 1286 390 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 11 38 137 16 38 48 777 6 70 1286 390 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 827 6 74 1368 415 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 827 6 74 1368 415 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 827 6 74 1368 415 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.33 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 601 1202 1615 1431 1805 1534 1805 3580 26 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.38 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.11 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.55 0.05 0.14 0.55 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.55 0.37 Uniform Del: 40.2 40.2 30.4 44.3 40.2 40.9 55.6 10.8 10.8 49.4 9.4 7.8 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.5 0.0 0.2 6.9 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.3 40.3 30.5 46.8 40.2 41.0 62.5 10.9 10.9 50.5 9.7 8.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 40.3 30.5 46.8 40.2 41.0 62.5 10.9 10.9 50.5 9.7 8.1 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 22 0 4 31 9 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Wed Apr 18, 2001 15:51:47 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert Blvd/Westborough Shopping Center Driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 171.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement ; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------II---------------I~---------------~~---------------) Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 747 76 0 691 0 0 0 0 160 0 109 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 747 76 0 691 0 0 0 0 160 0 109 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 812 83 0 751 0 0 0 0 174 0 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 812 83 0 751 0 0 0 0 174 0 119 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1229 xxxx 447 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 173 xxxx 564 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 173 xxxx 564 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 241 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 171 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 171.0 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLADTD,CA PROJECT ALTERNATNE INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS APPENDIX E LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS EXISTING SCENARIO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE A.M. PEAK AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert/King ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.631 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------~~---------------~j---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------jj--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 90 55 130 320 25 30 280 220 70 175 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 90 55 130 320 25 30 280 220 70 175 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 82 98 60 141 348 27 33 304 239 76 190 103 ------------j---------------~I---------------jj---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.24 0.76 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.11 1.06 0.83 0.41 1.03 0.56 Final Sat.: 352 463 297 391 776 61 52 488 412 175 450 254 ------------~---------------j~---------------j~---------------~~---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.36 0.45 0.45 0.63 0.62 0.58 0.44 0.42 0.41 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 15.0 13.9 13.2 16.2 17.2 17.1 22.1 21.6 18.7 16.7 16.0 15.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.0 13.9 13.2 16.2 17.2 17.1 22.1 21.6 18.7 16.7 16.0 15.0 LOS by Move: B B B C C C C C C C C C ApproachDel: 14.1 16.9 20.4 15.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 14.1 16.9 20.4 15.9 LOS by Appr: B C C C ********************************,r*********************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~j---------------jj---------------jj---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------jj---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 205 0 0 600 10 15 0 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 205 0 0 600 10 15 0 80 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 33 223 0 0 652 11 16 0 87 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 33 223 0 0 652 11 16 0 87 0 0 0 ------------j---------------~!---------------jj---------------;j---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 663 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 834 xxxx 332 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 935 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 311 xxxx 670 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 935 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 302 xxxx 670 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------ij---------------j---------------jj---------------j Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 17.6 xxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.267 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------j---------------~I---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 175 40 95 585 0 0 0 0 70 0 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 175 40 95 585 0 0 0 0 70 0 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 190 43 103 636 0 0 0 0 76 0 65 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 190C 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 2861 648 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1488 0 1615 ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** ***' Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.08 Uniform Del: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.4 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 8.0 ZncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 13.5 13.5 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 13.5 13.5 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.0 DesignQueue: 0 4 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.307 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.6 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 230 0 0 625 30 20 0 50 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 85 230 0 0 625 30 20 0 50 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 92 250 0 0 679 33 22 0 54 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~j---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 O.CO 1.91 0.09 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3419 i66 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.04 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.7 28.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 ZncremntDel: 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.7 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 28.7 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 2 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********,t**********************************************************:************ Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.831 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.2 Optimal Cycle: 84 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 65 370 575 70 135 165 1730 20 175 685 125 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 65 370 575 70 135 165 1730 20 175 685 125 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 63 68 385 599 73 141 172 1802 21 182 714 130 ------------,---------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5168 60 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.17 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.14 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.22 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.32 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.22 0.83 0.83 0.19 0.20 0.43 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.43 0.15 Uniform Del: 43.3 43.3 40.1 45.3 39.0 21.3 40.3 31.0 31.0 51.5 32.1 14.3 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.3 12.0 7.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 2.8 2.8 22.7 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 43.6 43.7 52.1 52.6 39.0 21.5 41.0 33.9 33.9 74.2 32.3 14.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 43.7 52.1 52.6 39.0 21.5 41.0 33.9 33.9 74.2 32.3 14.4 DesignQueue: 4 4 19 33 4 5 9 76 1 11 33 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 121.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II----------'----i Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 1610 45 175 705 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 1610 45 175 705 0 L'ser Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 1713 48 186 750 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 324 0 0 0 0 1713 48 186 750 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------I,~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 880 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1761 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 360 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 360 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 121.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * F * * * * * * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 121.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.682 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.6 Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L -. T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 45 25 85 310 25 107 40 1260 5 15 605 85 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 45 25 85 310 25 107 40 1260 5 15 605 85 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 C.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 Reduct Vow: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 48 27 90 330 27 114 43 1340 5 16 644 90 ------------j---------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.83 0.85 0.70 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1006 566 1615 1324 1805 1534 1805 3593 13 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.18 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.68 0.04 0.20 0.36 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.36 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.4 25.4 24.6 32.2 24.5 26.1 53.6 19.7 19.7 59.0 18.7 16.3 ZncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 1.0 1.0 59.5 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 25.5 25.5 24.7 36.2 24.5 26.3 55.5 20.7 20.7 118.5 18.B 16.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 25.5 25.5 24.7 36.2 24.5 26.3 55.5 20.7 20.7 118.5 18.8 16.3 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 45 0 1 23 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:41:43 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *****,r************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ***********************************,r********************************s***,r**•**** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 290 65 0 675 0 0 0 0 105 0 25 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 290 65 0 675 0 0 0 0 105 0 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 315 71 0 734 0 0 0 0 114 0 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 315 71 0 734 0 0 0 0 114 0 27 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------~---------------~~---------------~j---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 717 xxxx 193 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 368 xxxx 822 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 368 xxxx 822 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * '' * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 412 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.2 ApproachLOS: * * "' C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:05 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: PM Existing Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution Paths: Routes:• Configuration: Default Command Default Volume Default Geometry Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Paths Default Routes Default Configuration Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PROJECT ALTERNATIVE P.M. PEAK PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert/King Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.738 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 200 370 85 35 260 55 30 140 200 75 295 160 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 200 370 85 35 260 55 30 140 200 75 295 160 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 217 402 92 38 283 60 33 152 217 82 321 174 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.65 0.35 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.28 1.12 0.60 Final Sat.: 352 610 142 310 552 118 61 312 406 111 445 251 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.62 0.66 0.65 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.74 0.72 0.69 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 26.9 27.8 26.8 15.0 22.6 22.1 21.8 21.8 20.0 32.4 30.7 27.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.9 27.8 26.8 15.0 22.6 22.1 21.8 21.8 20.0 32.4 30.7 27.5 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C C C D D D ApproachDel: 27.4 21.8 20.8 30.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 27.4 21.8 20.8 30.0 LOS by Appr: D C C D ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 16.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 625 0 0 520 15 30 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 70 625 0 0 520 15 30 0 40 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 76 679 0 0 565 16 33 0 43 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 76 679 0 0 565 16 33 0 43 0 0 0 ------------~---------------;~---------------~I---------------ij---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 582 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1065 xxxx 291 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1003 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 22i xxxx 712 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1003 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 208 xxxx 712 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------~;---------------j,---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25.5 xxxx 10.4 xxxxx x_~cxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.527 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.8 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 575 70 200 360 0 0 0 0 175 0 120 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 575 70 200 360 0 0 0 0 175 0 120 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 625 76 217 391 0 0 0 0 190 0 130 ------------~---------------j;---------~------~~---------------~j---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1:00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3167 385 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1461 0 1615 ------------I- ~I---------------~~---------------i~--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.17 Uniform Del: 0.0 14.6 14.6 20.3 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 9.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.0 15.0 21.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 9.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.0 15.0 21.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 9.1 DesignQueue: 0 14 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 **********x******************************************************•************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.319 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: p+ ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------jj---------------jj---------------Ij---------------j Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------j---------------jj---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 635 0 0 500 35 70 0 125 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 635 0 0 500 35 70 0 125 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 103 690 0 0 543 38 76 0 136 0 0 0 ------------j---------------j---------------j~---------------jj---------------j Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3340 234 1465 C 1615 C 0 0 ------------;---------------!j---------------jj---------------i;--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.5 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 8.6 22.2 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 9 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAYD,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *,r*************,r****************,r**,r**********************,r***,r***************** Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.767 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.7 Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 45 85 180 450 105 215 205 785 20 260 1655 410 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 45 85 180 450 105 215 205 785 20 260 1655 410 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 818 21 271 1724 427 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 818 21 271 1724 427 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 47 89 188 469 109 224 214 818 21 271 1724 427 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.92 0.08 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 '805 1615 1823 5087 131 1805 5187 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------jl---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.33 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.33 0.15 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.43 0.61 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.31 0.77 0.77 0.34 0.42 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.77 0.43 Uniform Del: 44.3 45.3 48.9 46.9 43.1 31.1 48.8 34.7 34.7 36.3 28.8 12.3 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.6 13.5 4.8 0.1 0.5 12.1 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.6 0.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.6 45.9 62.4 51.7 43.2 31.7 60.8 35.0 35.0 37.3 30.5 12.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.6 45.9 62.4 51.7 43.2 31.7 60.8 35.0 35.0 37.3 30.5 12.6 DesignQueue: 3 5 11 27 6 10 12 40 1 13 71 12 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 B05 25 305 1610 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 805 25 305 1610 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 856 27 324 1713 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 856 27 324 1713 0 ------------~---------------i~---------------~I~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 441 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 883 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 14.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * B * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * " ApproachDel: 14.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.503 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2 Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 35 125 15 35 45 670 5 65 1175 370 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 35 125 15 35 45 670 5 65 1175 370 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PAF Volume: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5 11 37 133 16 37 48 713 5 69 1250 394 ------------~---------------!~---------------~I---------------~~--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1805 1534 1805 3581 25 1805 3610 1615 ----- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.35 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.50 0.05 0.13 0.50 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.50 0.35 Uniform Del: 40.3 40.3 29.8 44.0 40.3 40.9 55.3 10.7 10.7 48.4 8.9 7.7 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.3 40.3 29.8 45.5 40.3 41.0 59.5 10.8 10.8 49.3 9.1 7.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 40.3 29.8 45.5 40.3 41.0 59.5 10.8 10.8 49.3 9.1 7.9 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 7 1 2 3 19 0 4 28 9 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PM Existing Fri May 4, 2001 13:43:08 Page i0-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ****~t***Yt**!r*******tk************•k****~F*~F************~11r*Yr**************Yr********* Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 64.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F r****:*,r******,r******:***,r******************,r**********,r***********+************ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Znclude Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 635 65 0 625 0 0 0 0 145 0 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 635 65 0 625 0 0 0 0 145 0 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 690 71 0 679 0 0 0 0 158 0 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 690 71 0 679 0 0 0 0 158 0 103 ------------~---------------j~---------------I~---------------j,---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1065 xxxx 380 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx 623 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx 623 ------------j---------------i~---------------II---------------jl---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 297 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 64.4 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 64.4 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA APPENDIX F LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS BACKGROUND SCENARIO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE A.M. PEAK AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert/King Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.684 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 volume Module: Base Vol: 77 93 56 133 327 30 33 303 227 71 199 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 93 56 133 327 30 33 303 227 71 199 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 84 101 61 145 355 33 36 329 247 77 216 105 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 i.25 0.75 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 340 450 283 381 743 70 53 488 390 161 465 235 ------------~---------------~!---------------~i---------------~~---------------i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.48 0.47 0.68 0.67 0.63 0.48 0.46 0.45 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 15.6 14.5 13.8 17.1 18.5 18.3 25.4 24.7 21.2 18.1 17.3 16.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.6 14.5 13.8 17.1 18.5 18.3 25.4 24.7 21.2 18.1 17.3 16.3 LOS by Move: C B B C C C D C C C C C ApproachDel: 14.7 18.1 23.3 17.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 14.7 18.1 23.3 17.2 LOS by Appr: B C C C ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignaiized Method (Base Volume Alternative) **********************************************************************,r*:***:*** Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree *****,r************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: 8 **********************************************************+*********,r*********** Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~i---------------~~---------------~;---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 211 0 0 615 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 211 0 0 615 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 34 229 0 0 668 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 34 229 0 0 668 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 679 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 856 xxxx 340 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 922 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 301 xxxx 662 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 922 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 292 xxxx 662 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------~j---------------;~---------------~j---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.0 xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * " * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKL~AND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.273 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.7 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 181 41 97 597 0 0 0 0 72 0 61 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 181 41 97 597 0 0 0 0 72 0 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 197 45 105 649 0 0 0 0 78 0 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 2856 652 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1486 0 1615 ------------j---------------I~---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.30 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.08 Uniform Del: 0.0 13.3 13.3 15.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 8.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 13.4 13.4 15.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 8.1 DesignQueue: 0 4 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.308 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.4 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 238 0 0 636 33 21 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 238 0 0 636 33 21 0 54 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 85 259 0 0 691 36 23 0 59 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3407 178 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Greer./Cycle: 0.15 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 27.9 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 28.7 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 28.7 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 2 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to-DFCS ASSOC., OAFCLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 7-1 Level Of Service, Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *,r*,r************************************************,r,r****,r****,r**************** Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.859 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 40.4 Optimal Cycle: 94 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------I-___-____--___-I~- _-II--_--_____ ~ __---__-_-__ _-___-___-__ __---I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 67 380 589 70 138 166 1797 27 178 732 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 67 380 589 70 138 166 1797 27 178 732 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 74 70 396 6i4 73 144 173 1872 28 185 763 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 70 396 614 73 144 173 1872 28 185 763 128 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 70 396 614 73 144 173 1872 28 185 763 128 ------------I---------------jl---------------~~---------------~I---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5151 77 1805 5187 1615 ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.18 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.15 0.08 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.42 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.33 0.54 Volume/Cap: 0.25 0.22 0.86 0.86 0.19 0.21 0.45 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.45 0.15 Uniform Del: 43.5 43.3 40.6 45.8 39.2 22.1 41.1 31.4 31.4 51.9 31.6 13.9 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.4 14.9 9.3 0.0 0.2 0.8 3.6 3.6 27.6 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 43.9 43.7 55.5 55.1 39.2 22.2 41.9 35.0 35.0 79.4 31.8 14.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.9 43.7 55.5 55.1 39.2 22.2 41.9 35.0 35.0 79.4 31.8 14.0 DesignQueue: 4 4 20 34 4 6 9 79 1 11 35 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAIQ,AND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 ACM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 154.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bourd West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1679 46 178 763 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sse: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1679 46 178 763 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1786 49 189 812 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1786 49 189 812 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.i xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 918 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1835 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 278 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 337 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 278 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 337 xxxx xxxxx - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 154.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 28.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: 154.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAFQ~AND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HG~4 Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.710 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bourd South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~j---------------~~---------------~i---------------~ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1322 7 15 661 87 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1322 7 15 661 87 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1406 7 16 703 93 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 190C 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.69 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 .0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1024 532 1615 1311 1805 1534 1805 3589 18 1805 3610 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.19 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.71 0.04 0.21 0.39 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.39 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.8 25.8 25.0 33.0 24.9 26.5 54.0 19.8 19.8 59.0 18.5 15.8 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 2.2 1.2 1.2 70.5 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 25.9 25.9 25.1 37.9 24.9 26.7 56.2 21.0 21.0 129.5 18.7 15.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 25.9 25.9 25.1 37.9 24.9 26.7 56.2 21.0 21.0 129.5 18.7 15.9 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 47 0 1 25 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c)~1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM Yr 2002 Base Case Fri May 4, 2001 13:45:15 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********************************,r*********************************************** Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh) 18.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 290 66 0 690 0 0 0 0 107 0 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 290 66 0 690 0 0 0 0 107 0 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 315 72 0 750 0 0 0 0 116 0 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 315 72 0 750 0 0 0 0 116 0 28 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 193 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 364 xxxx 822 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 364 xxxx 822 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 408 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.6 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.6 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DK5 ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PROTECT ALTERNATIVE P.M. PEAK 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection !#1 Gellert/King Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.765 Loss Time (sec): C (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.6 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------~---------------jl---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Volume Module: Base Vol: 205 375 87 36 266 56 31 144 206 77 303 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 205 375 87 36 266 56 31 144 206 77 303 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 223 408 95 39 289 61 34 157 224 84 329 177 Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.65 0.35 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.28 1.12 0.60 Final Sat.: 346 597 141 304 541 116 60 308 400 110 439 246 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.64 0.68 0.67 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.51 0.56 0.76 0.75 0.72 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 28.9 29.8 28.6 15.4 23.8 23.3 23.0 23.0 21.2 35.3 33.3 29.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 29.8 28.6 15.4 23.8 23.3 23.0 23.0 21.2 35.3 33.3 29.8 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C C C E D D ApproachDel: 29.4 22.9 22.1 32.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 29.4 22.9 22.1 32.5 LOS by Appr: D C C D Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 637 0 0 534 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 637 0 0 534 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 77 692 0 0 580 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 77 692 0 0 580 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~j---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 597 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1089 xxxx 298 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 990 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 213 xxxx 704 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 990 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 200 xxxx 704 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 26.4 xxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.0 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 585 71 204 369 0 0 0 0 181 0 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 585 71 204 369 0 0 0 0 181 0 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 636 77 222 40'~ 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 636 77 222 401 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 636 77 222 401 0 0 0 0 197 0 134 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3169 384 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1461 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Nodule: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.17 Uniform Del: 0.0 14.8 14.8 20.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 0.0 8.9 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.2 15.2 21.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 9.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.2 15.2 21.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 9.0 DesignQueue: 0 14 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.330 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.5 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R --I ---------------;,---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~j---------------~i---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 650 0 0 512 38 69 0 107 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 650 0 0 512 38 69 0 107 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 111 707 0 0 557 41 75 0 116 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~i---------------~~---------------j~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 O.CO 0.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3329 245 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------jj---------------~j---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 O.CO 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 22.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 '0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 21.7 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 21.7 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 23.4 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 10 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert :****:**********,r***********:*************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.790 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 36.4 Optim:~l Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R i Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ov1 Include Ov1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 87 184 442 107 220 225 835 20 272 1705 421 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 87 184 442 107 220 225 835 20 272 17C5 421 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 48 9i 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 91 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 46 91 192 460 111 229 234 870 21 283 1776 439 ------------~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 190G 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5095 123 1805 5].87 1615 ------------!---------------;~---------------~~---------------~j---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.13 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.34 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.33 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.43 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.32 0.79 0.79 0.36 0.43 0.79 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.79 0.45 Uniform Del: 44.5 45.5 49.1 47.8 44.1 31.2 48.3 34.4 34.4 36.3 29.3 13.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.6 15.8 5.9 0.1 0.5 13.3 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.0 0.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.8 46.1 65.0 53.6 44.2 31.7 61.6 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.2 13.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.8 46.1 65.0 53.6 44.2 31.7 61.6 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.2 13.3 DesignQueue: 3 5 11 26 6 11 14 42 1 14 73 12 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic **************************:x**ir,ttr.*********************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 836 26 311 1660 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 836 26 311 1660 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 689 28 331 1766 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 889 28 331 1766 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 459 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 917 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx xxxxx ------,---- ---~~---------------~~---------------~~- I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 15.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.5 xrxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * C * * * * * * B , * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 15.1 xxxxxx x~xxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.519 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.1 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound •West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------jj---------------jj---------------~i---------------j Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------~---------------j!---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 699 5 66 1218 376 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 699 5 66 1218 376 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 5 11 38 i35 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 744 5 70 1296 400 ------------I,---------------jj---------------ij---------------jj---------------! Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1805 1534 1805 3582 24 1805 3610 1615 ------------j---------------j~---------------~!---------------jj---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.36 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.52 0.05 0.14 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.52 0.36 Uniform Del: 40.6-40.6 30.2 44.4 40.6 41.2 55.4 10.6 10.6 48.7 8.9 7.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.2 5.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.6 40.6 30.3 46.2 40.6 41.4 60.4 10.6 10.6 49.6 9.1 7.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.6 40.6 30.3 46.2 40.6 41.4 60.4 10.6 10.6 49.6 9.1 7.8 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 20 0 4 29 9 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC Fri May 4, 2001 13:47:04 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***,r***********,r******,r***,r**,r************************,r********,r**************** Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 76.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 655 68 0 619 0 0 0 0 150 0 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 655 68 0 619 0 0 0 0 150 0 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 712 74 0 673 0 0 0 0 163 0 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 712 74 0 673 0 0 0 0 163 0 105 ------------~---------------~~---------------I,~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------!~---------------i Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1085 xxxx 393 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 214 xxxx 612 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 214 xxxx 612 ------------~---------------~;---------------j~---------------~~--------------- Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 288 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 76.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 76.5 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA APPENDIX G LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS PROJECT SCENARIO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE A.M. PEAK AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***********,r*******************************************,+**********,r*:*********** Intersection #1 Gellert/King ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.690 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------jj---------------~~---------------jj---------------j Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------j---------------,j---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 97 59 133 329 30 33 303 228 73 199 97 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 80 97 59 133 329 30 33 303 228 73 199 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 87 105 64 145 358 33 36 329 248 79 216 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 87 i05 64 145 358 33 36 329 248 79 216 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 87 105 64 145 358 33 36 329 248 79 216 105 ------------,---------------ij---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Saturation Flow Nodule: Lanes: 1.00 i.24 0.76 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 339 445 284 378 738 69 52 483 388 163 459 23~ ------------;---------------ji---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Capacity Analysis Nodule: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.38 0.49 0.48 0.69 0.68 0.64 0.48 0.47 0.45 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 15.8 14.7 14.0 17.2 18.8 18.6 25.9 25.1 21.6 18.4 17.6 16.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.8 14.7 14.0 17.2 18.8 18.6 25.9 25.1 21.6 18.4 17.6 16.5 LOS by rove: C B B C C C D D C C C C ApproachDel: 14.9 18.4 23.7 17.5 Delay Adj: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 14.9 18.4 23.7 17.5 LOS by Appr: B C C C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------jj---------------jj---------------j{---------------j Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include LaT~es : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------j---------------jj---------------ij---------------jj---------------I, Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 221 0 0 620 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 32 221 0 0 620 10 15 0 81 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 35 240 0 0 674 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 35 240 0 0 674 11 16 0 88 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~j---------------j~---------------jj--------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------jj---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 685 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 869 xxxx 342 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 918 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 295 xxxx 659 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 918 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 287 xxxx 659 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------;j---------------jj---------------jj---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped DeI: 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.3 xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS:- * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAFQ~AND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.291 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.3 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~--------------=11---------------~~---------------~j---------------! Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 181 41 99 603 2 8 0 26 72 0 61 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .Initial Bse: 8 181 41 99 603 2 8 0 26 72 0 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 9 197 45 108 655 2 9 0 28 78 0 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 197 45 108 655 2 ~9 0 28 78 0 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 9 197 45 i08 655 2 9 0 28 78 0 66 ------------;---------------j~---------------~I---------------~j---------------~ Saturation Fiow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 2856 652 1805 3599 11 1809 0 1615 1809 0 1615 ----- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.63 0.63 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.00 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.29 0.2C 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.09 Uniform Del: 29.1 13.9 13.9 15.7 5.2 5.2 26.7 0.0 27.0 22.8 0.0 9.6 IncremntDel: 5.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.7 0.6 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 34.3 14.0 14.0 15.9 5.2 5.2 27.0 0.0 28.7 23.4 0.0 9.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 34.3 14.0 14.0 15.9 5.2 5.2 27.0 0.0 28.7 23.4 0.0 9.6 DesignQueue: 0 4 1 3 9 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ********~F********iF*****aF ~F******#**********Yt**Yt*************tt*****Yr ~t**~R it********* Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.320 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.3 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A **t,t**************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Greer.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 247 0 0 667 34 21 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 247 0 0 667 34 21 0 54 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 85 268 0 0 725 37 23 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 268 0 0 725 37 23 0 59 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 85 268 0 0 725 37 23 0 59 0 0 0 ------------ ---------------j;---------------;~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation. Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0:94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.C0 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3411 174 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 - --------------- ------------~---------------j~---------------;-------------- .I I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.19 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.3 28.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 28.8 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 28.8 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 2 0 0 9 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 *************,r************************************.*********:******************* Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND, CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.867 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 41.0 Optimal Cycle: 98 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------Ij---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 ------------~---------------j;---------------~~---------------!~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 67 380 613 71 144 169 1797 27 178 732 128 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 67 380 613 71 144 169 1797 27 178 732 128 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 74 70 396 639 74 150 176 1872 28 185 763 133 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 70 396 639 74 150 .176 1872 28 185 763 133 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 70 396 639 74 150 176 1872 28 185 763 133 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.CC 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1605 1615 1823 5151 77 1805 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.15 0.08 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.16 0.28 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.32 0.54 Volume/Cap: 0.25 0.22 0.87 0.87 0.19 0.22 0.45 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.45 0.15 Uniform Del: 43.7 43.5 40.9 45.5 38.6 21.7 41.1 31.8 31.8 52.0 32.1 13.9 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.4 16.0 9.7 0.0 0.2 0.8 4.0 4.0 29.2 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.1 43.8 56.9 55.1 38.6 21.8 42.0 35.8 35.8 81.1 32.3 14.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.1 43.8 56.9 55.1 38.6 21.8 42.0 35.8 35.8 81.1 32.3 14.0 DesignQueue: 4 4 20 35 4 6 9 79 1 11 36 4 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic Average Delay (sec/veh) 155.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------!j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1682 46 178 769 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 1682 46 178 769 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1789 49 189 816 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 331 0 0 0 0 1789 49 189 818 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------;j---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo11owL'pTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 919 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1838 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 336 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 336 xxxx xxxxx ------ i ------ --------------- Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 155.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 28.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 155.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA AA'I 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.711 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 i Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1325 7 15 667 87 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 25 87 316 25 109 41 1325 7 15 667 87 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1410 7 16 710 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1410 7 16 710 93 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 52 27 93 336 27 116 44 1410 7 16 710 93 ------------~---------------I~---------------j!---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.69 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 C.O1 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1024 532 1615 1311 1805 1534 1805 3589 18 1805 3610 1615 ------------;---------------;j---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.20 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 '0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.71 0.04 0.21 0.39 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.39 0.11 Uniform Del: 25.9 25.9 25.1 33.0 24.9 26.6 54.1 19.8 19.8 59.0 18.5 15.8 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 2.2 1.2 1.2 70.9 0.1 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.0 26.0 25.2 38.0 24.9 26.7 56.3 21.0 21.0 130.0 18.6 15.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.0 26.0 25.2 38.0 24.9 26.7 56.3 21.0 21.0 130.0 18.6 15.8 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 15 1 5 3 47 0 1 25 3 **,t********************,r************+e***************-*************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2002 BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:58:49 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 298 67 0 721 0 0 0 0 107 0 27 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 298 67 0 721 0 0 0 0 107 0 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 324 73 0 784 0 0 0 0 116 0 29 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 324 73 0 784 0 0 0 0 116 0 29 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx 198 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx 816 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx 816 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 396 xxxxx Shrd StpDeI:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 19.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * C ApproachDei: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 19.3 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PROJECT ALTERNATIVE P.M. PEAK 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Gellert/King ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.777 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.7 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 208 380 90 36 271 56 31 144 212 80 303 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 208 380 90 36 271 56 31 144 212 80 303 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 226 413 98 39 295 61 34 157 230 87 329 177 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 226 413 98 39 295 61 34 157 230 87 329 177 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 226 413 98 39 295 61 34 157 230 87 329 177 ------------;---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.66 0.34 0.16 0.84 1.00 0.29 1.11 0.60 Final Sat.: 343 590 142 301 538 113 59 306 396 112 433 241 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.66 0.70 0.69 0.13 0.55 0.54 0.58 0.51 0.58 0.78 0.76 0.73 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 30.1 31.3 30.0 15.5 24.7 24.1 23.7 23.7 22.1 36.8 34.7 30.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.1 31.3 30.0 15.5 24.7 24.1 23.7 23.7 22.1 36.8 34.7 30.9 LOS by Move: D D D C C C C C C E D D ApproachDel: 30.8 23.7 22.9 33.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 30.8 23.7 22.9 33.9 LOS by Appr: D C C D Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAIQ,AND,CA 2002 PM BC/Protect Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.8 worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ------------ -------------- ~---------------j~---------------~j- --~~- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------j---------------j~---------------jj---------------~j---------------i Volume Module: Base Vol: 76 648 0 0 548 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 76 648 0 0 548 15 30 0 41 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 83 704 0 0 596 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 83 704 0 0 596 16 33 0 45 0 0 0 ------------~---------------j;---------------jj---------------j,---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------i---------------~j---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 612 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1121 xxxx 306 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 977 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 203 xxxx 696 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 977 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 190 xxxx 696 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------j---------------jl---------------~~---------------jj---------------j Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 27.8 xxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.520 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 585 71 205 372 4 10 1 12 181 1 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 585 71 205 372 4 10 1 12 181 1 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 30 636 77 223 404 4 11 1 13 197 1 134 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 30 636 77 223 404 4 11 1 13 197 1 134 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 30 636 77 223 404 4 11 1 13 197 1 134 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3169 384 1805 3571 35 1665 151 1615 1802 9 1615 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.24 0.54 0.54 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.43 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.19 Uniform Del: 25.8 14.1 14.1 19.9 7.0 7.0 29.3 29.3 29.3 21.0 21.0 10.0 IncremntDel: 0.7 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.1 10.1 10.1 18.1 1.3 1.3 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.5 14.5 14.5 21.0 7.1 7.1 39.3 39.3 47.4 22.3 22.3 10.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.5 14.5 14.5 21.0 7.1 7.1 39.3 39.3 47.4 22.3 22.3 10.1 DesignQueue: 1 14 2 6 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PN. BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ************************************************r******************************* Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.336 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veYi): 8.4 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 682 0 0 526 39 70 0 107 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 682 0 0 526 39 70 0 107 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 111 741 0 0 572 42 76 0 116 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 741 0 0 572 42 76 0 116 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 111 741 0 0 572 42 76 0 116 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3329 244 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------;j---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.3 3.5 0.0 0.0 8.6 8.6 22.6 0.0 14..2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 21.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.5 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 21.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.7 23.5 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 10 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI~AND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) **********************,r********************,r*,-********************,r************* Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.798 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 36.7 Optimal Cycle: 74 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 90 184 452 108 223 232 835 20 272 1705 431 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 90 184 452 108 223 232 835 20 272 1705 431 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 48 94 192 471 113 232 242 870 21 283 1776 449 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 94 192 471 113 232 242 870 21 283 1776 449 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 48 94 192 471 113 232 242 870 21 283 1776 449 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------II---------------j Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5095 123 1805 5187 1615 --;j- ~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.34 0.28 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.43 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.33 0.80 0.80 0.36 0.42 0.80 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.80 0.46 Uniform Del: 44.6 45.7 49.3 47.7 43.9 30.7 48.1 34.4 34.4 36.4 29.7 13.2 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.7 16.9 6.2 0.1 0.5 13.8 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.1 0.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 45.0 46.4 66.2 53.8 44.0 31.2 61.6 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.8 13.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.0 46.4 66.2 53.8 44.0 31.2 61.8 34.8 34.8 37.6 31.8 13.6 DesignQueue: 3 5 11 27 6 11 14 42 1 14 74 13 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI~AND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic ***.r**************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C **********************************************************,r********************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Sound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 843 26 311 1663 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 843 26 311 1663 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 897 28 331 1769 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 897 28 331 1769 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------i, Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------(~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Capacity Nodule: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 462 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 924 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 552 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 747 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 552 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 747 xxxx xxxxx ------------,---------------I~---------------~---------------;~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 15.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 15.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxx~x ApproachLOS: C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) r*********************,r*rr**********************************,r*******,r************ Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.520 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 14.1 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level O~ Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 706 5 66 1221 376 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 10 36 127 15 36 46 706 5 66 1221 376 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 751 5 70 1299 400 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 11 38 13.5 16 38 49 751 5 70 1299 400 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5 11 38 135 16 38 49 75i 5 70 1299 400 ------------~---------------j~---------------~i---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 567 1247 1615 1433 1605 1534 1805 3583 24 1805 3610 1615 ------------~--------------- i---------------~~---------------ii---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.09 O.Oi 0.02 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.36 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.12 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.52 0.05 0.14 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.52 0.36 Uniform Del: 40.6 40.6 30.3 44.4 40.6 41.3 55.4 10.5 10.5 48.8 8.9 7.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.2 5.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.7 40.7 30.4 46.3 40.6 41.4 60.5 10.6 10.6 49.7 9.1 7.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.7 40.7 30.4 46.3 40.6 41.4 60.5 10.6 10.6 49.7 9.1 7.8 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 20 0 4 29 9 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2002 PM BC/Project Fri May 4, 2001 13:59:33 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 92.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F *****.********************,r***********************************************•***** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------j,---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 685 69 0 633 0 0 0 0 150 0 99 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 685 69 0 633 0 0 0 0 150 0 99 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 745 75 0 688 0 0 0 0 163 0 108 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Voi.: 0 745 75 0 688 0 0 0 0 163 0 108 II_______________' ------------;---------------~ ---------------'I il---------------j Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 FoliowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1126 xxxx 410 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 202 xxxx 597 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 202 xxxx 597 ------------~---------------;~---------------j!---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 274 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 92.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 92.1 ApproachLOS: * * * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA APPENDIX H LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS CUMULATIVE SCENARIO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE A.M. PEAK AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert/King Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.737 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bourd East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------,---------------~~---------------~j---------------I~---------------~ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 83 102 61 139 349 32 35 315 238 75 210 102 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 83 102 61 139 349 32 35 315 238 75 210 102 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 90 111 66 151 379 35 38 342 259 82 228 111 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 111 66 151 379 35 38 342 259 82 228 111 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 90 111 66 151 379 35 38 342 259 82 228 111 ------------;---------------;!---------------i~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.25 0.75 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.12 1.07 0.81 0.39 1.08 0.53 Final Sat.: 329 436 270 368 718 67 52 470 379 157 449 227 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.41 0.53 0.52 0.74 0.73 0.68 0.52 0.51 0.49 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 16.6 15.4 14.7 18.3 20.6 20.4 29.8 28.9 24.4 19.9 19.0 17.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 16.6 15.4 14.7 18.3 20.6 20.4 29.8 28.9 24.4 19.9 19.0 17.9 LOS by Move: C C B C C C D D C C C C ApproachDel: 15.6 20.0 27.1 18.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 15.6 2C.0 27.1 18.9 LOS by Appr: C C D C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------,j---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 230 0 0 652 11 16 0 85 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.C0 Initial Bse: 34 230 0 0 652 11 16 0 85 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 37 250 0 0 709 12 17 0 92 0 0 0 Reduct Voi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 37 250 0 0 709 12 17 0 92 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 721 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 914 xxxx 360 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 890 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 276 xxxx 642 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 890 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 268 xxxx 642 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 19.4 xxxx 11.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: A * * * * * C * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Aasoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLA.'~7D,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.307 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec} Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.5 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: $ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------Ij---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Znclude Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 186 45 107 630 2 8 0 26 80 0 65 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initia'~ Bse: 8 186 45 107 630 2 8 0 26 80 0 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 9 202 49 116 685 2 9 0 28 87 0 7i Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 202 49 116 685 2 9 0 28 87 0 71 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Final Vol.: 9 202 49 116 685 Z 9 0 28 87 0 71 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I.00 Final Sat.: 1805 2821 684 1805 3599 11 1809 0 1615 1809 0 1615 ------------,---------------~~---------------j~---------------j'---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.00 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.10 Uniform Del: 29.2 14.3 14.3 15.7 5.3 5.3 26.8 0.0 27.2 22.4 0.0 9.2 IncremntDel: 5.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.0 14.4 14.4 15.9 5.4 5.4 27.2 0.0 29.1 23.0 0.0 9.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.0 14.4 14.4 15.9 5.4 5.4 27.2 0.0 29.1 23.0 0.0 9.3 DesignQueue: 0 5 1 3 9 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDOnalds Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.346 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 6.9 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 249 0 0 700 36 25 0 60 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 249 0 0 700 36 25 0 60 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 103 271 0 0 761 39 27 0 65 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 271 0 0 761 39 27 0 65 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 103 271 0 0 761 39 27 0 65 0 0 0 ------------j---------------I---------------II---------------II---------------~ Saturation Fiow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3410 175 1900 0 1615 0 0 0 ------------!---------------~~---------------jj---------------~i---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.04 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.23 O.OC 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 22.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.9 4.9 27.8 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 28.8 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 28.8 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 2 0 0 10 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) 0.903 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.3 Optimal Cycle: 116 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Ovi Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 ------------~---------------!I-----_----------;---------------;~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 73 390 641 74 150 172 1887 30 181 766 138 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 73 390 641 74 150 172 1887 30 181 766 138 `Jser Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 77 76 406 668 77 156 179 1966 31 189 798 144 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 76 406 668 77 156 179 1966 31 189 798 i44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 77 76 -406 668 77 156 179 1966 31 189 798 144 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.'i0 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5147 81 1805 5187 1615 --------------------------- i---------------;I---------------~I---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.19 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.15 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.16 0.28 0.22 0.22 0.43 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.33 0.54 Volume/Cap: 0.26 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.20 0.23 0.47 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.47 0.16 Uniform Del: 44.0 43.9 41.7 45.8 38.6 21.9 41.5 32.3 32.3 52.4 31.9 13.7 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.4 21.3 13.2 0.0 0.2 0.9 5.7 5.7 36.8 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.5 44.3 63.0 59.1 38.6 22.1 42.4 38.0 38.0 89.2 32.1 13.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.5 44.3 63.0 59.1 38.6 22.1 42.4 38.0 38.0 89.2 32.1 13.8 DesignQueue: 4 4 21 37 4 6 10 83 1 11 37 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *************************************************+****:**r********************** Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic Average Delay (sec/veh): 206.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 320 0 0 0 0 1769 46 181 809 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 320 0 0 0 0 1769 46 181 809 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 1882 49 193 861 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 1882 49 193 861 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ~ - - - - - - - - - - - Critical Gap~Modu'~e: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 965 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1931 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 258 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 258 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------j~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 206.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 34.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * * * * * D * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 206.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway **************************************:********,r**********************.********* Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.749 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.8 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C **********************,r********************************************************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Right.=: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------j~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 27 90 325 27 113 45 1399 8 17 701 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 53 27 90 325 27 113 45 1399 8 17 701 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1488 9 18 746 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1488 9 18 746 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 56 29 96 346 29 120 48 1488 9 18 746 97 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 19C0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.85 0.68 0.95 0.8"~ 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1018 527 1615 1294 1805 1534 1805 3585 22 1805 3610 1615 ------------ --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.27 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.21 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.75 0.04 0.22 0.41 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.41 0.12 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 25.3 33.8 25.2 26.9 53.9 20.4 20.4 59.0 18.7 15.8 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.7 0.0 0.2 2.3 1.6 1.6 79.6 0.2 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.4 26.4 25.4 40.5 25.2 27.1 56.3 22.0 22.0 138.6 18.8 15.6 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.4 26.4 25.4 40.5 25.2 27.1 56.3 22.0 22.0 138.6 18.8 15.8 DesignQueue: 2 1 4 16 1 5 3 49 0 1 26 3 ***********,c******************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAIdD,CA AM 2010 BC/PR Fri May 4, 2001 13:49:41 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh) 21.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ************,r******************************************************************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R --------------~~------p---g----~~------p---9----~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 313 71 0 760 0 0 0 0 X115 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 313 71 0 760 0 0 0 0 115 0 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 340 77 0 826 0 0 0 0 125 0 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 340 77 0 826 0 0 0 0 125 0 34 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUp:im:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 792 xxxx 209 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 330 xxxx 803 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 330 xxxx 803 ------------j---------------j---------------~~---------------~~--------------- Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 378 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 21.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * C * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 21.3 ApproachLOS: * * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA PROJECT ALTERNATIVE P.M. PEAK 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Gellert/King ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec}: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.849 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 34.4 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign. Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------!I---------------II---------------II---------------i Volume Module: Base Vol: 218 395 93 40 285 60 35 155 221 83 325 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 218 395 93 40 285 60 35 155 221 83 325 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 237 429 101 43 310 65 38 168 240 90 353 185 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 237 429 101 43 310 65 38 168 240 90 353 185 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 237 429 101 43 310 65 38 168 240 90 353 185 ----,I---------------II- il- Saturation Flow Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.65 0.35 0.17 0.83 1.00 0.29 1.12 0.59 Final Sat.: 330 567 136 290 516 110 60 293 383 106 425 231 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.72 0.76 0.75 0.15 0.60 0.59 0.63 0.57 0.63 0.85 0.83 0.80 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 35.6 37.3 35.7 16.4 28.3 27.5 27.3 27.3 25.1 46.7 43.8 38.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.6 37.3 35.7 i6.4 28.3 27.5 27.3 27.3 25.1 46.7 43.8 38.7 LOS by Move: E E E C D D D D D E E E ApproachDel: 36.6 26.9 26.2 42.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 36.6 26.9 26.2 42.7 LOS by Appr: E D D E Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAIQ,AND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 4=1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***********************************************************,r******************** Intersection #2 Gellert/Rountree ****************************,r***************,e*,-********************************* Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C **********************,r****************************************.*********,r****** Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R ' -----p---g----~~------P---9----~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0-~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 82 676 0 0 574 15 33 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 82 676 0 0 574 15 33 0 45 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 89 735 0 0 624 16 36 0 49 0 0 0 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Final Vol.: 89 735 0 0 624 16 36 0 49 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~j---------------~~---------------~~---------------; Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx,xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Caflict Vol: 640 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1178 xxxx 320 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 954 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 187 xxxx 682 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 954 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 173 xxxx 682 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 31.1 xxxx 10.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * '~ * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 19.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 ACM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Gellert/Pac&Save Entrance Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.550 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.9 Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 620 75 216 399 4 10 1 12 195 1 130 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 620 75 216 399 4 10 1 12 195 1 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 30 674 82 235 434 4 11 1 13 212 1 141 Reduct Voi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Voi. 30 674 82 235 434 4 11 1 13 212 1 141 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 30 674 82 235 434 4 11 1 13 212 1 141 Saturatior. Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3167 385 1805 3573 33 1665 151 1615 1802 9 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Voi/Sat: 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.24 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.22 0.22 0.55 0.55 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.19 Uniform Del: 26.1 14.3 14.3 20.1 6.9 6.9 29.5 29.5 25.2 21.0 2i.0 9.9 IncremntDel: 0.8 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.1 26.6 26.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.9 14.8 14.8 21.6 7.0 7.0 56.1 56.1 25.5 22.7 22.7 10.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.9 14.8 14.8 21.6 7.0 7.0 56.1 56.1 25.5 22.7 22.7 10.0 DesignQueue: 1 15 2 6 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Gellert/MacDonalds Entrance ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.362 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 110 712 0 0 562 44 76 0 117 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 110 712 0 0 562 44 76 0 117 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 120 774 0 0 611 48 83 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 120 774 0 0 611 48 83 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.OC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina'~ Vol.: 120 774 0 0 611 48 83 0 127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~j---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.77 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 0 0 3310 260 1461 0 1615 0 0 0 ;~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.3i 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 21.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.8 8.8 22.6 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 22.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 23.6 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: ,22.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 23.6 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 3 8 0 0 10 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DFCS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative} ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Wesborough/Gellert ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.843 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.7 Optimal Cycle: 88 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 98 200 490 111 238 242 905 22 280 1777 460 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 98 200 490 111 238 242 905 22 280 1777 460 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 51 102 208 510 116 248 252 943 23 292 1851 479 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 102 208 510 116 248 252 943 23 292 1851 479 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 51 102 208 510 116 248 252 943 23 292 1851 479 ----------- ------------ij---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 3430 1805 1615 1823 5094 124 1805 5187 1615 ------------j---------------~!---------------i~---------------~~---------------. Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.36 0.30 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.15 0.15 O.iB 0.18 0.34 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.42 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.35 0.84 0.84 0.36 0.45 0.84 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.84 0.49 Uniform Del: 44.3 45.5 49.4 47.6 43.5 30.8 48.7 34.7 34.7 37.7 31.0 13.7 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.7 22.3 8.7 0.1 0.6 19.0 0.6 0.6 1.9 3.1 0.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 44.6 46.2 71.7 56.5 43.6 31.4 67.7 35.3 35.3 39.6 34.2 14.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.6 46.2 71.7 56.5 43.6 31.4 67.7 35.3 35.3 39.6 34.2 14.1 DesignQueue: 3 6 12 29 6 11 15 45 1 15 78 14 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 8-1 ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Westborough/Olympic Average Delay (sec/veh) 16.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Znclude Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 O Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 919 26 325 1744 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 919 26 325 1744 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Vo'~ume: 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 978 28 346 1855 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 978 28 346 1855 0 ------------;---------------,',---------------;~---------------~i---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowlipTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 503 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1005 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 520 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 697 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 520 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 697 xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------j Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 16.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * * * * * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 16.5 xxxxxx ~ xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * * Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKLAND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001 14:02:15 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***:***+*********************************,r************************************** Intersection #7 Westborough/Galway ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.550 Loss Time (sec}: 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.6 Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: B *****************************,r*********************:****,r***********,r*********** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 11 38 137 16 38 48 765 6 70 1284 390 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 11 38 137 16 38 48 765 6 70 1284 390 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 814 6 74 1366 415 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 814 6 74 1366 415 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 6 12 40 146 17 40 51 814 6 74 1366 415 ------------I---------------~ -----~ I~---------------~~---------------~~---------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.75 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.33 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 601 1202 1615 1431 1805 1534 1805 3580 26 1805 3610 1615 ~~- -j,---------------~~- Capacity A.'~alys~s Module: Vol/Sat: C.O1 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.38 0.26 Crit N:oves: **+* **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.11 0.69 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.55 0.05 0.14 0.55 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.55 0.37 Uniform Del: 40.2 40.2 30.3 44.3 40.2 40.9 55.6 10.8 10.8 49.2 9.4 7.9 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.5 0.0 0.2 6.9 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 40.3 40.3 30.3 46.8 40.2 41.0 62.4 10.9 10.9 50.3 9.7 8.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 40.3 30.3 46.8 40.2 41.0 62.4 10.9 10.9 50.3 9.7 8.1 DesignQueue: 0 1 2 8 1 2 3 21 0 4 31 9 **************************************************,r***************,r************* Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAIQ~AND,CA 2010 PM BC/Proj Fri May 4, 2001-14:02:15 ------ - ----- Page 10-1 ------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *,r*,r*******~*,r******************,r*******,r****,r*******************+****,r********> Intersection #8 Gellert/Shopping Ctr Exit Average Delay (sec/veh): 144.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R ~~---------------~;---------------~~------P---9----~ Control: -I Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 715 76 0 680 0 0 0 0 160 0 107 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 715 76 0 680 0 0 0 0 160 0 107 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 777 83 0 739 0 0 0 0 174 0 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 777 83 0 739 0 0 0 0 174 0 116 ------------j---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~--------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1188 xxxx 430 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 184 xxxx 579 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 164 xxxx 579 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 253 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 144 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * F * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 144.0 ApproachLOS: * '` * F Traffix 7.1.0607 (c) 1999 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DKS ASSOC., OAKI,AND,CA APPENDIX I SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS 9-14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 7-1998 Figure 9-8 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Urban Areas) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 600 2 ~ 500 s p 400 ~ ~ N °' a o W 300 z ~ ~ 0 200 x c~ = 100 0 I I I ~ ~ t OR R LANE (MAJOR) &A2 OR)MORE LANES (MINOR) I I 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH `, ~:;',>-._ ~.~•~ ' d~~ fit- ~~'~l i., ~ ~ 1... ~ . - .. ~`. * NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOL' ~ FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. ~I ~~~ ~,. ~~, ~ ~ _ , ~,^ ~' f Y' ~` , ~~ 9-14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 7-1998 Figure 9-8 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT {Urban Areas) 600 a ~ 500 s ~ v p 400 ~ a a o W 300 SZ i 0 200 = 100 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) OR 1 LANE MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 1 .~ 1 ~ 1' ~~ 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH - * NOTE: ~'.. 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOL[ :-~ '_UME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD YOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. ~,^ \1/ ?, ~~ ~_ y ,; ~ ~,. • f ;,• - "/~ a '~- ',i', f;,. r ~ r f ~ I , '1 i:. ~ ' ~~ ~~ 9-14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 7-1996 Figure 9-8 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Urban Areas) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 600 x ~ 500 s p 400 ~ ~ N a a o w 300 z ~ ~ 0 200 x c~ = 100 0 I I ~ Y ~ 1 OR R LANE (~VIAJOR) &A2 OR,MORE LAN SI (M N,OR) I I 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH i ~ ./ * NOTE: 150 VPH APP: ' AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STRE APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. / ~~ ~; : -i a: APPENDIX C SITE LINE ANALYSIS WILSEY~'~ HA 111% ~~ ENGINEEia1Nt? ^ PLANNING i 9L1FiVEY1Nti May 31, 2000 Ms. Cazol Anne Paintez Director of Planning DUC Housing Farmers 14107 Winchester Blvd. Suite H Los Gatos, CA 95032 WH No. 620-OZ-05 Re: Sight Distance Analysis Den: Ms. Painter. We have been requested to investigate the adequacy of sight distance along Gellert Boulevard in t3ie vianity of your proposed development. Spcczficallv that between Rowntree Way and the northerly connection to Gelert Boulevard. A field review was made. to verify existing conditions. The posted speed 1unit on Gellert Boulevard is this area is 35 rndes per hour. The required stopping sight distance for this speed is 250 feet. (Caltza: s Design Manual 4'" Edition -Table 201.1). The available sight distaZCe from the plans foz vaxious conditions is as follows: Plan (See attached sketch) The available horizontal sight distance between Rowatree Way and the entering road is 260 ft: for a right nursing vehiGe from Rowntree Road. This tnccts the required sight distance. For a vehicle traveling south along Gellert Blvd. at the posted speed, the available sight distance is considerably gzeaies than the 250 ft. required. ~.~ (Set attached profile) Gellertt Blvd. is not xestricted by vertical sight distance. grade A correction for stopping sight distance need not be made because of excessive grade sine the correction is only recommended foz roads which are is excess of 3°,'0 (Gellert Blvd. is 10%) ~ the grade is foz one mile or longer. (Caltrans Design Manual 4~' Edition -Section 201.3) 383A Vintage Park Drivo ^ Fostor Gtry, CA 9440a ^ 6~0 /349-2151 • Fax: 650 1345-r-921 Ms. Cazol Anne Painter Msy 31, 2000 Page 2 On The plan and pxo~ of the traffic clcmcats for the proposed development from the connection to Gellert Blvd. m Rowntsee Wap meets the sight distance and braking xecluiremeats as g}vea in the Caltrans design manual. Very txulq yours, apu,SEY HAM - ~c~Ct~SS1p~, ~ rank G Tedesc ~~ ~,. ~-• ~~O Vice Presideat, sansportatioa ~~,~ `?r s cr. Roa Calhoun / 'c ~ _ 212 ~ ~ ~. , v ~l rI r=x~„r ~s ~Z \\AG~D~P-DRIVE~PR~JErnsaD-02~oS•31•o0 to CasoU~Painm - SiEhe Di.neee Aa~lyne.d« HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL 200-1 ~~ t3. ts~s CHAPTER 200 GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND STRUCTURE STANDARDS Chapter III of °A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets," AASH'TO, 19&3, contains a thorough discussion of the derivation of stopping Sight di3taliCt. 201.2 Panning Sight Distance Topic 201 -Sight Distance Index Zt11.1 -General Sight distance is the continuous length of highway ahead visible to the driver. Three types of sight distanct are considered here: passing, stopping, and decision. Stopping sight distance is -the minimum sight distance to be provided on mul- tilane highways and on 2-lane roads when passing sight distance is not econonucally obtainable. Stopping sight distance also is to be provided for all elements of interchanges and intersections at grade, including private road connections (see 'Topic 504, Index 405.1, & Figure 405,7). Decision sight distance is used at major decision points (nee Indexes 201.7 and 504.2). The following table shows the standards for passing and stopping sight dsstancc related to design speed. These shall be the minimum values used in design. Table 201.1 Sight Distance Standards Design Speed(I) Stopping() Passing (mph) (ft) (ft) 20 ......................... 125 ................ 800 25 ......................... 1 S0 ......... ,...... 950 30 ......................... 200 ................ 1100 35 ......................... 250 ................ 1300 40 ......................... 300 ................ 1500 4S ......................... 360 ................ 1650 So ......................... a3o ................ 1800 SS ......................... S00 ................ 1950 60 ...... ................... 580 ................ 2100 65 ......................... 660 ................ 2300 70 ......................... 750 ................ 2500 7 5 ......................... 840 ................ 2600 80 ......................... 930 ................ 2700 Passing sight distance is the minimum sight distance required for the driver of one vehicle to pass another vehicle safely and comfortably. Passing must be accomplished without reducing the speed of an oncoming vehicle vaveling at the design spend should it come into view after the overtaking maneuver is started. The sight distance available for passing at any place is the longest distnnce at which a driver whose eyes are 3.5 feet above the pavement surface can nee the top of an object 4.25 foci high on the road Passing sight distance is cansidererl Daly on Z- lane roads. At critical locations, a stretch of 3- or 4-lane passing section with stopping sight distance is sometimes more economical than two lanes with passing sighs diatanct (see Index 204.4). Figure 201.2 shows graphically the relationship among length of vertical curve, design speed, and algebraic difference in grades. Any one factor can be determined when the othez two are known. Sec Chapter 6 of the Traffic Manual for criteria relating to barrier striping of ao-passing zones. 201.3 Stopping Sight Distance The minimum stopping sight distance is the distance required by the driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring his vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measwed from the driver's eyes, which are assumed to be 3.5 feet about the pavement surface, to an object O.S-foot high on the road. 'Ih~~ninQ sight dials tea in ,Table 2 1.3 should be increases by 20% on s u t a i n e d downgrades stecncr_.ihan ~~_and longer ihan_1 ID~ ® (l•) Sce Topic IOI for sciccrion of design spied. (2) Increase by 2D46 on suatvned doWn~ades >3'i, & > l mile. . ^ N ~ ~ ~ ^. ~ ~ N W ~~ W h ~_ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ {~. _ ~ N g m d m Z 4 N N ~ ti n W n _ L:! O W .~i ~~I ~Q Z$ 0 0 a ~ W N - I ~ t'V ~ ~ ~i¢ ~, a z ~N ~ _ 0 Zo ~~z ~ ~ ~~ ~I a ~b 'E'~ O N .i ..` _ _ . ._ 1 • i ._,. ~ _ o ° ~ ., m ~ N Q ~ M r'!M r!M M Ih m r (,~ L.LI > ~ ~ Q O f ~ ~I W Q p ~ ~ \J, III ~ Z T .J i V Z O O N N W 2 -I- Z N m A ~~ ~ ^ ~I. f 4 ~ d ~ V'f N Z ~ VC C N~ ^ ~ = v V = O Z 3I ~ =o m~ a ~ • N ~ C ~ ~ Z o~ DG LJ W ~ ~ Z. N ~ ~ W `n ~..i ~ ~I~ xU W 2 T o N ~~ ~ 4-. r O N _W x APPENDIX D BIOLOGICAL SURVEY 7`}$ R~1Lt ASSOCIATES b60 dVAVEt`~LEY STREET, SUITE 201 Tel: 650-327-0429 P.O.80X 880 PAlO ALTO, CA 94301 Fax; 650-327-4024 Envl-orrr-tsrrtal lrr~acf Analysis • Ecotog/cal Studies • A9source Management December 9, 1999 Case Code: 8810 John Hansen Hansen PSC, Inc. 99 Almaden Blvd. 8ulto 4;a4 San Joss, CA 96~ 13 Dear Mr. Fiar•~en, At your request I conducted a biological surveyor, an approximately 13 acre parcel on the northwest comer of ~eileri Boulevard and Westbourough Boulevard in Daly City, California, on November 29, 1859. The site aonaiats of $ flat strip of land adjacent to Gellert Boulevard, and a series of steep cut elopes and'f}at benches. There is no development on the parcel with the exception of a temporary Chrlstma~ tree lot on the lower flat area. Vegetation on site consists of disturbed ruderal vegetstion and arroyo willow scrub on the tower fiat area and dense stands of rvcf<rose (Cistu~ cretleu8) and annual grassland an the steep cut slopes and upper benches. The invasive Jubata gt'at8s (t,^,arfaderle ~ubata) is common on the site, having Invaded most open grassland and sttrubiand areas, There are also occassional willow scrub patches cn the cut slopes and higher ber-ches. Soils on site are cut and fiA material and vary greatly in texture and ihlclcneas. The arroyo willow scrub {=~a+ch an the lower flat area occupies approximately two acres. This area did not Cotitt~ln surface water at the time of survey, and does not have astream-cut channel. A wetland dsRreation Is racammended for this area Plant species Identified on site ware categorized into four vegetative communities: Arroy4 flow scr~yt~b area Arroyo willow (Sala leWole~.$y Wax myrtle (Myrk~t: ;oiilllfcrnka) Acacia (Actchr 8p.) Rush {JuncxJS ap.) Rvckrose (Ctaiua ~tku9) Coyote brush {8scd~ala ptlc~t;s) Poison oak {Tox~code+~drors allversiloba) Tree lupine (Luplnu~ ~trbonaua) 7oyon (H.ter~melsa arf~uflfolla} Ruderai (dlstu,ibsd~rbat~ide ire a lion) Queernanne'a iac~{4avcus cerote) Bird's foot de4rweed (~cxuat t~Omlc~~lafus) ttatlan wild rye {Lolfvin r»tfi'~i9rorum) Rspbit's foot 5~ (Porypo~on mcns~vl;snsis) Bristly ax-tongue (Plchrls echloldes} native and nor;-native annual grasses (~oaceae) Jubata grace (Corteder;a Jsbate) Page 2 TRA Latter b ,1ohn Mernsen, Hsrnsen PSC,Inc----•--December 9, 1999 Birds recorded on the site on the day of the survey included a red shouldered hawk, white-crowned sparrow, and arnerlcan ~oiain. The coastal scrub and arroyo wi{low habitat on site is likely to provide habitat far several other common, bird species. Due to the lack of large trees. the site is not expected !fl provide nesting habitat for protected raptors or other sensitive bird spades. Three feral cats were seen on. site, as well as the feathered remains cf three birds. A search of thB Cellljomla Natural Diversity Database revealed 18 sensitive species within 3 miles of the alts. An' Mls>31on blue t;utterfiy (lcarlcia icario/des missionensis) San Bruno elfin butterfly (Incisalia moss;; bayensis) Catllppe >9Nverspot butterfly (Speyerla cailppe cal!lppe) Callfomta red-legged irofl {Rana aurora draytoniil Salt rnnrsh common yeliowthroat (GeothJypis !riches sinuosa) Tomalos isopod (Caecldvtaa fomalensis) pia San er~no M.c.tntaln manzarita (Arcrosfaphytos irr:br,'~.ata) Padfic manzanita (Arctostap~`ryios X paciflca) Monteta tiAan778inita (Arctastaphylos montaraensis} San Fcandsco lesaingia (Lessingia germanorum) Robust ap{netlowirel ohn+er (ChoriZanthe cuspidate vsr. cuspidate) San Francsco sp ` Reach layid (E.tyte samosa) Kellogg's horkefia (Horicetia cuneata seriC88) San Ftra-rtcisco camplon (Silene ver2cunda verec~-nda) San Frsrtcisrio owl's dover {Tnphysarla floribunda) San Francisco gUm plant (Grindeiia hirsurala maritirr;a) White.rayed pentacheata (Pentacltaera beilidiflora) The site dose not appear' to have suitable habkat for the any of the three endangered butterflies lound In the. ragior~ (Nilsston blue, Cailippe silvarspot, or San erunc elfin}. However the host plant for the CgUlppe sllverspat (Viola pedunculate), and one. of the host plants for She Mission blue {Lup/nus ficrmosus) is net visible at thss time, and a tcllow-gip survey should be conducted in the spring to make a deterr,'tinat+on on these species. Tomates isopod, and The sits 48 highly ur;~lceiy habitat far the California red-lagged frog, the common aattrnarsh yeAowihroat, due io the lack of ponded water and marsh habitat. No sensitive plant species were $otrse weedy vegetation oresita. axpac'ed based on the disturt:ed soil conditions and predorrua y to summary, I recommend that a follow-up survey be conducted in the spring (Marcht/April) for Illof~ pedu»cvlata and Luplnus formcsus. and that a wetland delineation be done on the arroyo wtNow scrub area. If you have any questions regarding this biological survey, please feel free to contact me at the otllce. Sincerely, Patrick Kobernus Associate APPENDIX E SPECIAL STATUS BUTTERFLY SPECIES REPORT Memorandum To: Carol Anne Painter Date: August 8, 2000 From: John Zentner Re: Gellert Property: _ Special status butterfly report Attached for your review is our report on the results of our surveys for the listed butterflies at the Gellert site. No listed host plants of the special status species were observed and none of the target butterflies were seen. We have concluded that the site does not provide habitat for these species. Please -give me a call if you have any questions. - - - , `; - t . ,; - i, '~ 1 i ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gellert Property Special Status Butterfly Assessment Project 703 DUC Report Issued: August 3, 2000 Project Site The site is located northwest of the corner of Westborough and Gellert boulevards in the City of _= South San Francisco in norlhein San Mateo County. Commercial buildings including a McDonalds restaurant occupy the actual northwest corner of the two boulevazds, but the site extends north from there along the west side of Gellert Boulevard until it curves to the northwest. The site consequently is about five times longer from south to north than from east to west, but because its eastern edge follows curvilineaz Gellert boulevazd, its shape is irregular. Its surveyed acreage is not presently known but is estimated to be about 5 acres. The site consists of a series of steep slopes and relatively level terraces excavated into the east slope of a hill consisting of Plio-Pleistocene marine sediments of the Merced formation. The site's widest terrace is adjacent to Gellert boulevazd and its highest part is a straight north-south western property line, which is demarcated by a fence separating the site from homes and streets covering the hill's summit. The site's southern boundary is unclear as surveys show the western property line extending to Westborough Boulevard, but the south end of the site's western fence terminates at a dental building well short of Westbourough. A sliver of land undeveloped except by an access road crossing to the dental building does extend to Westborough behind the McDonalds, however, and was included in the survey since it may be part of the site. The site's terraces are largely covered by annual grassland vegetation dominated by Bromzrs hordeaceus and B. diandrus (Appendix A contains a list of plants seen on-site). Similar grassland is also present in the central part of the site's slopes in a complex mosaic in which Cortaderia jubata, Baccharis pilularis, and Cistus creticus, but the latter dominates shrubby vegetation that becomes increasingly dense on slopes to the north and south of the site's center. A dense willow thicket dominated by Salix lasiolepis is present at the south end of the lowest terrace, and willows of that species are also frequent in dense Cistus scrub on the site's northernmost slopes. T1~e site's willows probably receive water from groundwater seepage since no hydrological features were evident on the site. Local Special Status Butterflies Five butterfly taxa occurring on the San Francisco Peninsula (San Francisco and San Mateo counties) have US Fish and Wildlife special status listings. They are: • - , . page two 1. Euphydryas editha bayensis -Bay checkerspot butterfly. The bay checkerspot is federally-listed as threatened (FT) and occurs several places in relatively undisturbed natural grassland in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Alameda, and Contra Costa counties. Its primary host plant is a native annual plantain. Plantago erecta, but later in spring, following the short-lived plantain's death, feeding can shift to two owl's clovers, Castilleja exserta and C. densiflorus, related to the plantain. 2. Icaricia icarioides missionensis -Mission blue butterfly The mission blue is federally-listed as endangered (FE) and confined to coastal scrub and grassland in Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties. Its host plants are three lupines, Lzrpinus albifrons, L. var:icolor, and L. formosus. 3. Incisialia mossii bayensis -San Bruno elfin butterfly The San Bruno elfin is FE and limited to the vicinity of a few cliffs and rock outcrops in San Mateo where its sole host plant, Sedum spathulifolium, occurs. 4. Speyeria calippe calippe - Calippe silverspot butterfly The calippe silverspot is FE and confined to relatively natural grasslands and scrub on San Bruno Mountain in northern San Mato County. Its host plant is Viola pedunculata. 5. Speyeria zerene myrtleae -Myrtle's silverspot butterfly The myrtle's silverspot is FE and confined to coastal scrub and prairie in Sonoma, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties. Its primary host plant is Viola adunca. Survey results On May 4 and 29, 2000, the site was surveyed for host plants and listed butterfly species by Dr. Glen Holstein of Zentner & Zentner. No host plants were found; the single lupine on-site is Lupinus arboreus, which is not a host plant for any special status species. This lupine is common on the site's higher western slopes and is also present near the edge of the willow thicket at the southern end of the lowest terrace. No butterflies were seen during the first survey and the only butterflies observed on the second review were two common species: west coast lady (Vanessa annabella) and cabbage white (Pieris rapae). As no listed host plants of the special status species were observed and as none of the target butterflies were seen, we conclude that the site does not provide habitat for these species. Appendix A PLANTS RECORDED ON THE SITE The following plant species were present on the site during the May 4 survey. The number or symbol preceeding the name of each species indicates its cover-abundance status on the site: 5=100-75% cover; 4=75-50%; 3=50-25%; 2=25-5%; 1=5%-common; and +=scarce. Species indicated by an asterisk (*) aze ornamental and similaz species extending a short distance onto the site from landscaping along the western property line and around the dental building and its access road. Ornamentals lacking an asterisk are escapes from cultivation more generally occurring on the site. AIZOACEAE 1- Carpobrotus edulis ANACARDIACEAE 1- Toxicodendron diversilobum APIACEAE +- Anthriscus caucalis 1- Conium maculatum +- Daucus carota +- Foeniculum vulgare ARALIACEAE *+- Hedera canariensis ASTERACEAE +- Achillea millefolium 1- Baccharis pilularis 1- Carduus pycnocephalus +- Chamomilla suaveolens +- Cirsium vulgare +- Conyza canadensis +- Conyza floribunda + - Cotula coronopifolia +- Gnaphal~um californicum +- Hypochaeris glabra +- Hypochaeris radieata 1-Picris echioides +- Senecio vulgaris +- Silybum marianum +- Sonchus asper 1-Sonchus oleraceus +- Tragopogon porrifolius page A-2 BRASSICACEAE +- Cardamine oligosperma +- Coronopus didymus I- Hirschfeldia incana^ 1- Raphanus sativus CARYOPHYLLACEAE +- Silene gallica CISTACEAE 3- Cistus creticus CORNACEAE *+- Griselinia littoralis CUCURBITACEAE +- Marah fabaceus EUPHORBIACEAE 1-Euphorbia crenulata +- Euphorbia peplus FABACEAE 1-Acacia longifolia +- Genista monspesszclana 2-Lotus corniculatus 1- Lupines albifrons 1- Medicago polymorpha +- Melilotus alba 1-Melilotus indica 1-Trifolium campestre 1-Trifolium hirtum 1-Vicia saliva +- Vicia villosa GERANIACEAE +- Etodium brachycarpum +- Erodium cicutarium I -Geranium dissectum +- Geranium molle HYPERICACEAE *+- Hypericum calycinum MALVACEAE I- Lavatera cretica MYOPORACEAE *+- Myoporum laetum MYRTACEAE *+- Callistemon citrinzrs *+- Eucalyptzrs globules *+- Feijoa sellowiana page A-3 ONAGRACEAE 1-Epilobium brachycarpum OXALIDACEAE +- Oxalis pes-caprae PAPAVERACEAE +- Fumaria muralis PASSIFLORACEAE *±- Pass~ora caerulea PLANTAGINACEAE +- Plantago coronopus 1-Plantago lanceolata POLYGONACEAE +- Polygonum arenastrum +- Rumex acetosella +- Rumex crispus PRIMULACEAE +- Anagallis arvensis RHAMNACEAE *+- Ceanothus griseus var. horizontalis *+- Ceanothus impressus *+- Ceanothus papillosus var. roweanus ROSACEAE +- Cotoneaster lacteus ' I- Heteromeles arbutifolia *+- Prunus salicina I- Pyracartha coccinea X P. koidzumii 1- Rubus ursinus RUBIACEAE +- Galium aparine SALICACEAE 2- Salix lasiolepis SCROPHULARIACEAE 1- Bellardia trixago JUNCACEAE 1- Jucus bufonius LILIACEAE +- Allium triquetrum POACEAE +- Aira caryophyllea 1-Avena burbata 1-Avena fatua 1- Briza minor 4- Bromus diandrus . ~, page A-4 4- Bromus hordeaceus 2- Cvrtaderia jubata +- Cynodon dactylon +- Dactylis glomerata +- Festuca arundinacea +- Festuca rubra 1-Hordeum marinum 1-Hordeum murinum 1- Holcus lanatus 1- Leymus Xmultijlorus 2- Lolium mult~orum + - Triticum aestivum 3- Vulpia myuros CUPRESSACEAE *+- Cupressus macrocarpa *+- Juniperus chinensis PINACEAE 1- Pinus radiata APPENDIX F WETLAND DELINIATION .~ \ \V` ` C ~ .. ? / I ~ ~ ~ ~ 2z~.`~`.` \~~. ~ 1 J ~\! J~~ ` \~~~ : ~~~!`~~~ ~'~ ~~ ~ a ~ E ' -%~ F L ~ -. ~~-~~~~ ~~. ~~ _ ~~~O ~ ~+ ~ppT~ ~ P 9' ' ~ ~ j~ .'~~r~'I 1!' i ~ ~~\ ~~ 1' ~.~ _ ''1 ,A,\ ' '--' `: ~~ ' ~c '~4r '\ 1 ` . ~~ , <• J _ __ I,`I •~ ,,mil r~ 1•\` ~ ,\~~.,',' ~as~ G1 ' ~. , ,r c. .+ ~~; _. -._.i _ ~ ';~~: _;, ~. _ ~~ ~' MARBELLAIGELLERT PROPERTY SECTION 404 JURISDICTIONAL • DELINEATION Project No., 703 DUC Zentner and Zentner ;~i ar ~,~ ~0. -~ ~~;'~~~~ ,~i~~ Prepazed for: \ i._J; ~~ ~;%~~l% DUC Housing Partners 11 '; L~~- 4 ;j ~-% ; :,:: ~, ~ : . ; '~ === ~~~ -: - Report Issued: ~~~~ `;\\ ~~~ ~ ,April 18, 2001 ,~ // , J \ r . , _ ~eaa ~~ : i, =' ~', ~ /735` ___';` ~~ ~ ~1 Land Planning and Reftoration ~. I 9~ Linden St~ert Suitr 6 Oakland , California 94607 Tcl.• ~ 10.622.8110 F,tx: 510.611.8116 PROJECT NAME: Marbella/Gellert Property USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle: San Francisco South - CNPS #448B PROJECT PROPONENT: DUC Housing Partners Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: e-mail: Ms. Carol Anne Painter DUC Housing Partners 14107 Winchester Blvd., Suite H Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 866-5511 (408) 866-5501 cpainter@duchousing.com JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION BY: Zentner and Zentner Contact: John Zentner, Sean Micallef Address: 95 Linden Street, Suite 6 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 622-8110 Fax: (510)622-8116 e-mail: johnz@zentner.com Field Asses sment: David Self, t2esource Ecologist Apri16, 2001 John Zentner and Brian Davis -- April 16, 2001 MARBELLA/GELLERT PROPERTY SECTION 404 JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION 1.0 PURPOSE This report and accompanying map of the project site present a delineation of jurisdictional "waters of the U.S." under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act ("CWA"). As defined in CWA Section 404 and its implementing regulations "waters of the U.S." include coastal waters, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), lakes, ponds, and wetlands (see generally 33 CFR Part 328). Any discharge of fill or dredged material into w xers of the U.S. is subject to regulation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") under CWA Section 404. 2.0 LOCATION The project site (hereafter the site) is located in the City of South San Francisco in northern San Mateo County (see Attached Figure 1). The site is a block west of the Westborough exit from Hwy 280, and is along the west side of Gellert Drive just north from Westborough Boulevazd beside a McDonalds restaurant. Parking is available by retail stores immediately east across Gellert Drive from the site. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The approximately 14.9 acre site consists of a relatively steep hillside that has been terraced in a series of steps descending from the uppermost ridgeline to a relatively flat azea near -Gellert Drive. The site is bounded by Gellert Drive which runs along the east edge of the site; a residential azea immediately west along the upper edge of the site; and a McDonalds Restaurant by the south east corner of the site. The site is a steep cut and terraced hillside that rises about 120 feet, through 5 narrow terraces, to a subdivision only about 300 feet to the west, for an average slope of about 40%. Site elevations run from about 285 feet up to about 405 feet. Substrates on the site are cut and fill associated with terracing of the site; they appear to be old marine sediments. Textures are loamy and very fine sand. The hydrology is complex-- surface runoff is limited due to the lack of a watershed, aside from the site itself, and several concrete (now somewhat overgrown) drainage ditches along the lowermost terraces. Groundwater is present near the surface in at least sufficient levels to support several dense willow groves, a small one on the uppermost slope and a more extensive thicket at the southeast corner. MarbellalGellert Section 404 Delineation page two The site is currently unused. It is a steep, terraced cut and filled former hillside, that was terraced with paved drains,. approximately two to three few decades ago, apparently to stabilize the steep former hill; allow construction of Gellert Drive; and create a strip of flat land along the low edge of the site for future development alongside Gellert Drive. 4.0 DELINEATION METHODS Boundaries between jurisdictional areas and uplands were determined in accordance with defined jurisdictional limits under CWA Section 404 as summarized below. Data points and boundaries of jurisdictional areas were mapped onto a topographic map at a scale of 1" _ 100'. Wetlands are defined by the CWA Section 404 implementing regulations as: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions". To be a wetland, a site must have a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, evidence of hydric soils, and wetland hydrology existing under the "normal circumstances" for the site. Boundaries between jurisdictional wetlands and uplands were determined using the routine on-site assessment procedure, Section D, Subsection 2, page 57 of the 1987 Delineation Manual. Dominant plant species, soil characteristics, and hydrology indicators were noted within a 10' by 10' sample area. Wetlands are distinguished from uplands by the presence of 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2) hydric soils, and 3) wetland hydrology. 4.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Hydrophytic vegetation is dominated by plant species that can tolerate prolonged inundation or soil saturation during the growing season. More than 50% of the dominant species must be wetland indicators of FAC, FACW, and OBL for the vegetation to be considered hydrophytic. These wetland indicators, or hydrophytes, are listed in the Delineation Manual as OBL, FACW, and FAC. Other plants are listed as FACU or NI, and unlisted plants are considered as UPL. These abbreviations are defined as follows: OBL Obligate Wetland Plants: occur over 99% of the time in wetlands. FACW Facultative Wetland Plants: occur 67% to 99% of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative Plants: occur 67% to 33% of the time in wetlands. FACU Facultative Upland Plants: occur 33% to 1 % of the time in wetlands. NI Non-indicator Plants. UPL Upland Plants: occur less than 1% of the time in wetlands. Mazbella/Gellert Section 404 Delineation page three Note: The 3 facultative categories are subdivided by (+) and (-) modifiers. FAC+ species are considered to be wetter (have a greater estimated probability of occurring in wetlands) than FAC species. FAC- species are considered to be drier (have a lesser estimated probability of occurring in wetlands) than FAC species. 4.2 Hydric Soils Hydric soils develop under the low oxygen conditions typical of prolonged inundation or saturation, and generally show visible indications of chemical reduction. The hydric nature of a soil is most often indicated by low matrix chromas of 0 to I, or 2 with mottles, and is determined by comparing the wetted soil with Munsell Soil Color Charts. The hydric nature of a soil may also be indicated by the presence of manganese or iron nodules, or other more subtle characteristics. 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Common wetland hydrology indicators demonstrate inundation or saturation and include observations of standing water, saturated soils, algal mats, water-matted detritus, and water stains on rocks or other objects. In evaluating these hydrology indicators some attention must be given to the frequency and duration of inundation, the effects of recent weather, unusual flooding and climatic fluctuations. S.0 RESULTS Attached Figure 1 shows the jurisdictional map; data sheets aze found in Appendix A. The site is a steep, terraced hill which supports ruderal vegetation dominated by non-native weeds, grasses, escaped shrubs, trees and pampas grass over the majority of the site and cypress windrows, with a few Eucalyptus and pines, along the south west edges of the site. Several willow thickets occur along paved drains in the south east and north east ends of the site and at the uppermost central part of the site. The willows are apparently sustained by groundwater with only occasional runofffrom a very limited watershed ,from storms during winter and from yazd runoff during the dry season. These are not jurisdictional habitats (wetlands), due to the lack of wetland vegetation in the understory, the non-hydric soils and the absence of surface hydrologic indicators. Each of these habitats is discussed in more detail below. Marbella/Gellert Section 404 Delineation page four a. Ruderal vegetation: Data points: 1, 2, 4-6 Most of the site supports ruderal (weedy} vegetation dominated by upland weeds, grasses and escaped garden shrubs. The sample points failed to satisfy the vegetation and hydrology criteria, with vegetation ranging from 11 % to 43% hydrophytes and with either no hydrology indicators, or with root oxidation but with vegetation that doesn't satisfying the FAC-Neutral test for hydrology. The substrate is unconsolidated sediment with colors at sample points 1, 2 and 5, that were outside the range typical of hydric soils. And, while sample points 4 and 6 have low chroma and redox features, these appear related to their origins as ancient marine sediments, plus recent exposure through grading. Dominant species and their regional indicator noted in samples of'the ruderal vegetation included the following: Dominant plant species: Ruderal vegetation Name pampas grass rock rose ripgut grass cut-leaved .geranium common groundsel wild oat soft chess bristly ox-tongue bird's-foot trefoil few-seed cress rattail fescue Regional Indicator Cortaderia selloana UPL Cistus sp., UPL Bromus diandrus UPL Geranium dissectum UPL Senecio vulgaris NI Avena fatua UPL Bromus hordeaceus FACU- Picris echioides FAC Lotus corniculatus FAC Cardamine oligosperma FACW Vulpia myuros FACU Other species noted in the ruderal vegetation were: common sow-thistle (Sonchus oleraceus, NI); scarlet pimpernel (Anagall is arvensis, FAC); wild radish (Raphanus sativa, UPL); horseweed (Conyza canadensis, FAC); suckling clover (Trifolium dubium, FACU); little quaking grass (Briza minor, FACW); summer mustard (Hirschfeldia incana, UPL); broad= leaf f lazee (Erodium botrys, UPL); parched willow-herb (Epilobium brachycarpum, UPL); spring vetch (Vicia sativa, UPL); bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare, FACU); toad rush (Juncos bufonius, FACW); Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus, UPL); India sweet clover (Melilotus indica, FAC); and white sweet clover (Melilotus alba, FACU). Marbella/Gellert Section 404 Delineation page five b. Cypress windrows The south end of the site hosts a windrow of cypress (Cupressus sp., UPL), with a sprinkling of gums (Eucalyptus sp., UPL) and pines (Pinus sp., UPL). These trees were planted on steep, well-drained slopes that border a parking lot and commercial building, both just off- site. Willow thickets Data points: 3 and 7 Several arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis) thickets occur in and alongside the low end of paved drains in the south east and north east edges of the site and along the uppermost slope near the center of the site. The drains, which were constructed to protect adjacent steep slopes by speeding runoff and inhibiting erosion, also help sustain the willows by concentrating occasional runoff, from storms during winter and from yard runoff during the dry season. The drain at the south east end of the site (sample 7 and vicinity) was dry during the April 6 field assessment while the soil in the northern drain was damp but had no flow, indicating the importance of ground water rather than the very infrequent runoff in sustaining these willows. The sample points in the thickets satisfy none of the technical wetland criteria, with: (1) vegetation ranging from 33% to only 50% hydrophytes; (2) soil colors outside the range typical of hydric soils, or with concrete under a shallow layer of decomposing willow leaves and silt, but no water; and (3) no indicators of wetland hydrology. Sample point 7 is typical of the drain areas with both arroyo willow and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) common and an understory of pampas grass (Cortaderia), indicating a predominance (by species) of non-hydrophytes. Sample point 3 is probably more telling as it is somewhat typical of the willow thickets on-site, including an overstory of willows but an understory dominated by upland species with the exception of the bird's foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and Italian rye grass (Lolium perenne), both FACs, and common in non-wetland conditions. Soils in this location are very important as they are both non-hydric (SY4/2 without mottles) and sandy, which are, along with the addition of groundwater, optimal for willow growth. Dominant species in these thickets are shown below. Marbella/Gellert Section 404 Delineation page six Dominant plant species: Willow thicket Name Regional Indicator arroyo willow Salix lasiolepis FACW Pampas grass Cortaderia selloana UPL Ripgut grass Bromus diandrus UPL bur clover Medicago polymorpha UPL bird's-foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus FAC wild oat Avena fatua UPL cut-leaved geranium Geranium dissectum UPL coyote bush Baccharis pilularis var. c. UPL spring vetch Vicia sativa UPL Italian ryegrass Lolium mult~orum FAC toad rush Juncus bufonius FACW coast live oak Quercus agrifolia UPL 703wetde.rpt APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS Zentnu & Zentnu Wetland Determination Form Project/site: County, State: Applicant: /~'/~s Observer(s): Date: " ` ~ ~ Community: ~ fp..r~{ R `` v Atypical7: ~1/ ~ _ Normal?: Explain: VEGETATION p. 1:~' tsp. 2: -~sp. 3: ~r ~ ~4~& ~.sp. 5:~ sp. 6: ap. 7: ~sp. 8: sp. 9: 'sp. T 0: Cove lass _~ ~_ ROINO L1/~PL Z.f ~'L ~~G sp. 11: sp. 12: sp. 13: sp. 14: sp. 15: sp. 16: sp. 17: sp. 18: sp. 19: c'pVER CLASSES 5 = 75-100% 4 - 50-75% 3 = 25-50'Jf 2 =5-25% 1 =marry-5% + =few r :one Cover Class Data Pt D ROIND _~ ~r sp. 20: u?~ Pucent of dominants' (exdud'mg NI) which are hydrophytes (OBL, FACW, and/or FAC): ///J~ ~^ Is the ve etation hydrophytk7 ~ V ~ d I y d ~ ~ ~ a~o v-~ jr~ K~ Rationale: (.~ vo~ (/j f~~~--f O d e xt;'e~ ~CJ~ / r-~ SOI ~~ V Soil Series: ~ ~` ~ ~ Sample Depth: ~ Texture: A Matrix: ~~ Mottle: Other Soil: _ ' Histosd Concretions ~Histic Epipedon ~tedox Concentrations / Depletions Sulfidic Odor High Organics /Surface Layu of Sandy Sal Aquie Moisture Regime ~ Organic Streaking /Sandy Soii Reducing Conditions ~On Local Hydric Sal List J~GGleyed or Low-Chroma On National Hydric Soi! List Othu: l Is the soil hydric't Rationale: G ~ ~0 ~~ ~ ~ i/'`!, HYDROLOGY Ir-tmd/Depth: /~ G SatJDepth: OthuHydrol: 1/1 d I/1 /~(/O Primary In ~cators Secondary Indictors (2t required) kwndated ~/ Oxidized Root Char»els /Top 12" Saturated in Upper 12 indtes _ Water-Stsined Leaves ~~~ ~~ ' ~~ Watu Marks Local Soil Survey Data ~~LppQ^~ Drift Unes ~ FAC-Neutral Test Sediment Deposits __._ Other (Explain in Rationale) Drainage Patterns . ~ /l ~~~~ fs wetland hydrdogy presem7 Rationale: ~ ~' f' N (_/(/ C ( . YIIETL.AND DETERMINA710N ` !s the area a wetlands Q Rationale SCv/ l S ~/'~ / V O' N C.. ~ ~eC~'1 rl / ~ Gr ~ t~'~ t ~t+ - .n1R1501CnONAL DETER)MtNA'noN Rationale: / / ^ C ~ ~~ Is the area ,),uiscGctional? / - ~ /2 0 Species pu 10' x 10' sample Zerrtner & Zeniner Wetla/nd Determination Form Data PC COVER CLASSES Project/Site: 1 ~ ~~ County, State: 5 = 75-700% Applicant: v~r~,Y~ 4 = 50-75% - Observe(s): 3 - 25-50% Date: 2 - 5-25% 1 =many-5% Community: G rA55 ~4 o e~ + =few Atypipl?: r ~ one - Nortnal?: Explain: u~ ~Y'~ Cove ROIND Cover ROIND VEGETATION Species per 10' x 10'sample Class lass NonVeg~ir. ~sp.l:# .~rU`-q ~ NPL ~.0.11:~a ~rl~xc wt/hev. ~ .~~W=--.. ~sp.2:~ ~ f3 1/- ap.12: ~ c r~wi v -~ L' sp. 3: ~ ,/ ~t 4- ~ ~ sp. i 3: 'i a /~ rL ~ip. 4:~'' ~1 r u(r4 ~ ,tsp. 14:7 ~ W~ t ' ~ ~v ' sp. 5: u C ~'rJr 'S" ~ ap. 15: •- ~ k4" _~ ~v -~s~7:>~ rs1 Yt r Fi4{(,u sp. 17: sp. 10: err/ r~lJ`i s T ~ sp. 20: 'T z o~ ~8C3._~r. Percent of dominartts• (excluding NI) which are hydrophytes (OBL, FACW, and/or FAC): Lr~ l~ /` p ~~~, ~ K the ve~g,/etation hydrophytic7 ~~ Rationale: ~/Yd~ f ~Y~~` ~ `'~~/V/ Z/'~~~ ~~(O ~ (i[O~/~Ct/l~ Soil Series: Sample Depth: Texture: Matrix: Mottle: Other Soil: Ca vq`tp`~ ~ Rationale:,. G ~ , f4 (N~ CL/ -- / f.~ _ Histosol Concretions 1 Histie Epipedon Redox Concentrations / Depletions Suifidic Odor High Organics /Surface Layer of Sandy Soil Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking /Sandy Soil Redudng Conditions /~ On Local Hydric Soii List Gleyed or Low-Chrome rl7° On National Hydric Soil List Other. L ~~ O'Q ~ !s the soil hydric? 1S.L~ . HYDROLOGY N InundJDepth: s ' Sat./Depth: O Otherliydroh N Prima locators Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches Water Marks Dritt Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns Secondary IndicatDrs (2+ required) Oxidized Root Channds /Top 12° Water-Stained Leaves ~j Lopl Sod Survry Data 2 OT ~ ~ ~ ZJ~"C O FAC-Neutral jest Other (Explain in Rationale) Rationale: ^ „ ,,/ `~~~/ ~' d / `l ~( f y wetland hydrology presets? WJ:TLAND DETERMINATION ~! /~ ~ Q ~,./ ' the area a wetland?. d Rationale: (ST /-e.S ~~ / V l.~ ~ti;~C~'r h l ~ G,,-/~~~ ~. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION k the area .haisdictiolpl? ~~ Rationale: ~~ ~~ ~~ . Zentna & Zentner Wetland Determination Form Project/Site: / /~ Sr ~~ County, State: ~~~ Applicant: Observer(s): Date: Community: ~ / t / h ~~e~ Atjrpigi?: Normal?: e /elop w~en-I Explain: Cover ROIND VEGETATION tsp. ~:~ ~sp. 2.>i~ -~sp. 3: ~-sp. 4:~ sp. 5: sp. 6: sP 7: ~• 8.~ sp. 9: sp. 10:~ Rationale: ~t'J ~ /0P~~1 ~~~ ,Fi~L N L L 1L~b Data Pt a ASSES ~VFR 5 - 75-100% 4 - 50-75% 3 - 25-50% 2 - 5-25% i -many-5% + -few . r -one Wl~ rniX o~ ~~~lc~ d Paf'"1jQas ,g/+~t.fS Cover ROIND Gass J4 wv<s ~h~ ~ ~~ sp. 12: sp. 13: sp. 14: sp. 15: sp. 16: sp. 17: sp. 18: sp. 19: sp. 20: ~~ /' 33 Percent of dominants` (excluding M) which are hydrophytes (OBL, FAC1N, and/or FAC): ~C Is the vegetatgon hydrophyiic7 ~Q' G~D ~~ C >cC~~ ~D to ~ G~~u'I/~'~1~~ solLS ~- ~ ~ ~ Soil serves: G • Ca v Sample Depth: ~ Texture: ~`^ ~ Matrix: Mottle: n O 2 ._ Other Soil: ' Rationale: ~ ~ ~ f% ~ "V _ Histasol Conuetions _Histie Epipedon ~$edox Concentrations / Depictions _ Sulfidic Odor High Organics /Surface Layer of Sandy Soil _ Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking /Sandy Soil _ Reducing Conditions On Local Hydric Soil List ~L~leyed or Low-Chroma n National Hydric Soil List Other: i~ `hoc ~~~i fs the soil hydric7 ~G HYDROLOGY Irus~dJpepth: SatJDepth: OtherHydrol: ~A ° r` Primary Indicators Secondary Indicates (2+ required) Mtmdated Oxidized Root Channels /Top 12" Saturated in tapper 12 inches ~ Water-Stained Leaves /} Water Marks Lori Sal Survey Data ~~_/'~ 5~ , zV -Drift Lines AC-NeutnJ Test T"" 5edvment Deposits Other (Explain in Ratignale) _Dnina-ePattems /~ h wetland hydrology present? r ya Rationale: n rG / ~ a!~ ~yt~~~' ~ . WETLAND DETERMINATION (/~ ~ " / ` /VD Rationale: C (,S ~-1 r JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Rationale: ~{~~GL ~~ Spedes per 1 O' x 10` sample / k the area Jurisdictional? `~ Z~, Zentner & Zeniner Wetland Detumi ation Form D a ta Pt C / ~~ ~ ' 7' ~ Project/Site. t /r COVER CLASSES County, State: 5 = 75-100% Applicant: 0 4 - 50-75% Observer(s): 3 ~ 25-50% Date: - 2 s 5-25% / 1 . marry-S% Community: ~ ~~Ss (~ (,~ +-few Atypipl?: N~, S r a one Normal7: Explain: Tj7(j ~u~_1,.Y~tc- =~~i ,, // / ~/-~P!/~ ~1rilt~ C(S~~~T~GI/eN ~rRr~S Cover ROIND Cover ROIND VEGETATION Species per 10' x 10' sample Class 1 © onVegC~(r. J ~ ~ sp, : K rt ~(1d7 sp. 11: sp. 2:* r -`11.t G Cdr ~~L sp. 12: sp. 3: w r ~ /~__ sp. 13: sp. S: ~ n _ ~ sp. 15: ~sp. 6:~ ~ /k M ~- f/ P~ sp. 16: sp. 7: sp. 17: sp. 8: sp. 18: sp. 9: sp. 19: sp. 10: sp. 20: ~ ~~ ~ d~ Percent of dominants' (excluding N() which are hydrophytes (OBL, FACW, and/or FAC): ~ Q f / ~/~D / ~ ~~ Rationale: /f-~I !./(1 Ql/j(/ /~ /~,j~ /~~,~ ~(~-J- G ~ d theve tation ydrophytic? `~ ~ ~ ~i7 ~ ~~ solLs S l S i ~ ~~~ A L> a er es: _ Histosd Concretions Sample Depth: _ _ Histic Epipedon ~Redox Concentrations / Depletions Texture: q~ ~({!~ _ Sulfidic Odor _ High Organics /Surface Lays of Sandy Soil Matrix: G e C! y _ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Organic Streaking /Sandy Soil Mottle: w / _ Redudng Conditions _ On Local Hydric Soil List Other Soil: r ~Gieyed or Low-Chrome _ On National Hydric Sdi List Other. Rationale: ~~ ~ ~,['~l~Qi ~l.l~~F~ ~/~O~~S' is the soil hydric? Q~ ~!-~~./S G~K~~ O'r~~ /~ [i~s~ohj9-~arre~ svc~,`rYren~ HYDROLOGY ~ , h u d /~C < Inund/Depth: dl'.` T~ t,cJ ~"I p Q Sat./Depth: /1 n OtherMydrd: Primary Indicators Secondary Indigtaz (2+ required) 'y Inundated ~ Orddized Root Channds /Top 12" Saturated qt Upper 12 inches _ Water•Stained Leaves Water Marks Sal Survey Data f ~' / / Drift lines ~~TGF GNbutral Test -~----"'- ( O J `~ O Sediment Deposits lather (Explain in Rationale) Draimge Patterns Ratiaule: ~ /,e ~~~~~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wetland hydrdogy present? /r !Q -/ ~- ~ ~ ~~ / %257_ WETLAND DETERMINATION ~. ,,/ l r ~ /'_ /~ is the ar~ea~a wetland? Rationale: ~PG , ~ ~~Jl~t ~ l,~ ~j 1~, ~Y ~~J ~'t-~~ N~ /`"Y~fi~~ JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION fs the area Jurisdctional7 ~~ Rationale: / / ~~ (~ ~ ~ ~i t~ ~ ~Z~l Zentner & ZentnPr Wetland Detumination Form Project/Site: County, State: Applicant: Observer(s): Date: Community: Atypical?: Normal?: Explain: VEGETATION sp. 1~ sP• 2:~ sp. 3: p. 4:)C '~ sp. 5: ~r~sp. 6:1~ ~` sp. 7: sp. 8: sp. 9: sp. 10: d~ ~ Cover R01ND lass ~~-- sp. 11: ~ sp. 12: sp. 13: [_ sp. 14: (~ sp. 15: ~`2R CL.ASSES 5 ~ 75-100% 4 = 50-75% 3 ~ 25-50% 2 - 5-25% 1 ~ many-5% + -few r~one Da® Cover ROIND pass ~ sp. 16: ' _ sp. 17: sp. 1 S: sp. 19: sP. 20: ~ ~ S- _ Pucent of dominants' (excluding Ni) which are hydrophytes (OBL, FAUN, and/or FAC): Is the vegetation hydrophytic? ~G Rationale: ~~ SOILS ~ Histosd Concretions Sal Serves' Histic Epipedon Redox Concentrations / Depletions Sample Depth: u of San Soil ~Sulfidic Odor High Organics /Surface Lay dy Texture: Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Stroking /Sandy Soil Matrix: ~ ' lr ~~Reducing Conditions On Local Hyd'ie Soil List Mottle: ~ Q Other Soil: I Gleyed or Low-Chroma On National Hydric Shc List I ~~ ~ `P Is the soil hydric~ ~ Rationale: /U p~ S o r ~'s/~ ~ ~ ~~ HYDROLOGY lnund./Depth: /A Sat./Depth: ~ OtherHydrd: ~ G `` Primary Indiptan Secondary lndiotors (2+ required) ~~~ Oxidzed Root Charxtds /Top 12" Saturated in Upper 12 inches WaterStained Leaves Water Mart -Local Sal Survey Data ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~/j~p ~~ Lines f,~C-Neutral Test !~`~' Sedment peposits Other (Explain to Rationale) Drainage Patterns ,~~, ~ b weUanrl hydrdogy PresentT G Rationale: ~(~ /n Qf /, (~l,l [~V_s yyETLpNp p~RMlNATION ~ Is the and a v~etlandi Rte` ~s ies .fURISDICIfONAL DEiERMtNAS10N/ Rationale: , ` n~(~ y~f Species per 10' x 10' sample k the area .lurisdictional? ~~ ~ S.?/~ ~f lz-o Zentner &Zentner Wetland Determination Form Project/Site: ~~ (/~ , r County, State: p Applicant: Obswer(s): Data Community: ~ ~ p'r Atypipl?: Y s Normal?: _ y~ 5 , Explain: ~• VEGETATION ~p. 1: #P. 2:.yti ~sP. 3: ~. ,~ksp. 4: ~fl- ~sp. 5:# sp. 6: ,~ s~. 7: sp. 8: sp. 9: ~. 1 D~ Spedes pu 10' x 1 D' sample VegQvr: J~srrur , , , (.Ga' Cover ROIND COV R ACSFS 5 R 75-100% 4.50-75% 3 ~ 25-50% 2 ~ 5-25% 1 ~ many-5% + -few r=one Oates PL Cover ROIND Class tsp. 12: ~ ~ c, : o r ~ ~7 T L ~ sp. 13: sp. 14: sp. i 7: F sp. 1 a: C_ sp. 2Q: ~L • - -- ( ~ Percent of dominants' (exduding NI) which are hydrophytes (OBL, FACW, and/or FAC): / ~) ,Q y p h the vege~ iqq hydrophytic? Rationale: ~y~ve~~Y~~. ~a ,V ~~ V~CL~'~ rJ+-.- <`f'r / ( I JUI W Soil Series: _ Histosd Concretiorn ~Ple Depth: D _ _ Histic Epipedon _ ~G Redox Concentrations / Depletions Textures 6 i GZ(/ _ Sulfidic Odor -High Organic /Surface layer of Sandy Soil Matri~c ~ `Aquic Mdsture Regime Organic Streaking /Sandy Soil Mottle: ~ ~ Reducing Condtions _ On Local Hydric Shc List Other Shc: ~ Y ~Gleyed or Low-Chromes _ _ On National Hydrie Soil List Other: Raiigrrale: IOW C~ G~ ~~ ~~d~ K~ ~ G~t~aln_s humdJDepth: D . SatJDepth: d OtherHydrd: O v` ~ ~ ~f f~the sd! hydric7 ~/ ~ ~~ll G~ 5 /i<~ Vi~ F~ U~~~ Primary Indicators Secondary. Ind+gtors (2+ required) Inundated :' Oxidized Root Charnels /Top 12^ Saturated in Upper 12 inches _ Wata-Stained Leavy Water Marks Local Sal Survey Data Drift Lines ~AC Neutral Test a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Sedunent Deposits ~ Other (Explain in Rationale) , Drainage Patterns n F ~f i -~- h wetland hydrdogy present? D Rationale , V D l Nl v! 1 G' Ol.{ c f WETLAND DETERMINATION ~ ~ Rationale: / /n / d / ~~~~~ /~ `~.,~~1 ~ ~~ h the ar~ and? '/ (/ Ct~~ 7j/ vI y C~ r/ ~~~' ~ ~P~ ' ~!/ / .~-- JURISDICTIONAL DETER/MINATION h the area Jurlsdctiorul? Rationale: ~ /1/ ~ ~ ~ , Zentner ~ Zentner Wetland Determination Form Project/Site: County, State: Applicant: Observe(s): .Date: Community: Atypical?: Norman: Explain: COVER CLASSJv4 5 - 75-100% 4 ~ 50-75% 3 - 25-50% 2 ~ 5-25% / J 1 ~ many-5% ~ ! I' n~_ E(~ W l~ ls~ /flel~,~ one Cove RO1ND ..~~,.Data///~Pt w~/l `~, ' G~yvJ,~ //~~ ~~'~F s~ - c~~~,° ~' d~G 1 Cover ROIND Gass ~~AnOpl Species per 10' x 10' sample lass 1 i NonVer~Cvr~ ~ 1Y/~~ ~ sp 11: 1/ Q lane !~~L~ sp, 12: ~sp.2:7~ ~ ' sp. 13: sp. 3: ~ 5 sp. 14: sp. 4: sp. 15: sp. S: sp. 1 6: sp. 6: {; sp. 17: sp. 7: ~ Ca-- ~ sp. 18: sp. 8: , )~~ sp. 19: sp. 9: ' ~ " sp. 20: ~ ~z sp. 10: Rationale: H (,/d f/-f/~~~1 ~' 1 / (~ SOILS ~~ Soil Series: Sample Depth: Texture: Matrix: Mottle: Other-Sal: Rationale: _ Kistosd _ Conaetions Redox Concentrations / Depletions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organics / Surface Layer of Sandy Shc Sulfidic Odor e i _ Organic Streaking /Sandy Sal m Aquic Mdsture Reg - _ On Local Hydric Sal List Reducing Condtions -Gleyed or Low-Chrome _ On National Hydric Soil List ~~: ~ Is the sol hydric7 /'~~~ ,,..n,,...,.,. G Nwmd./DePth: Sat./Depth: OtheHydrd: primary Indicators Msmdated Saturated in Upper 12 inches Water Marks Drift Lines S~ment Deposits prairnge Patterns Second indicators (2+ required) Oxidized Root annnets /Top 12" Water-Stained Leaves a ~ ~~„ ~ ~~0 ~f Local Sal Survey Data / ~ ,~ FAGNeutral Test Other (Explain in Rationale) /~ ~ k wetland hydrology present? / ~ Rationale: / v ~ ~r'(/1 ~' C~,( ov~ RatiortsJe: ~~ts7"/~S ~°~NP~ .1lJEt1SDIC1lONAL DETERMINAT{ON ~~~~~ Rationale: 0 ~C~~ C c~,~ h es Ol3L, FACW, and/or FAC): J- `G Percent of dominants (exduding NI) which are hydrop yt N the vegetation h drophytic7~ n / 1 Is ihearea .wetland? !~'- f '>~-r1 l Cif Cr/T ievl g. k the area haisdctiorud? ' CGS ~~ ~ ~1 ( _ o ~ ,r-r~`~i1" 5 \G ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ,, O n ~'_. c~ ~.-~ ~ . ~ O ~ O ~' II r. g c~ r» O O '-d ~d ~ r o ~ ~' ~ ~ ~. ° ~ ' ~ o ~ ~ r- ~ r (p . ~ ~ o. ~ ~. 0 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~; ~; ^ N ~ ~~;;,~_ s al ~, >,~;~ ~,. js' '; ~':; ' : ~ t d ~,~ ;~ ,: > 4 i, :.,~ . 1 f;: ~;:; ~rN~,.. ~ ~ ~ E.. ~? ~~ - .. ' d '-' D -i Z f'l Z20 ~~d~~ c~ r D !~ z r -1 a ^ C td -D 3 (/1 fTl D H O r-i ~-, ~i"J ~(~ -ID p a vj d f'l :Z7 3DOd C -I p (~£ D ~: ; Z -I Z -I ~ Gl p D fT1~ZZ , ~ D O ~ ~ ~ -1 C D fTl 3 ~ Z f'1 d ~ t7 D D ~~i n Z ~ p d !,l ~ 3 Z7 Z D ~ D Z -~ (~ -~ fTl r D~ ^ - -~ -D '1 fTl p ,.~~ d ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o D O C!1 Z Z o 0 bd ~ D Tl ~ ~ ~ ~ rTl a ~ r~ ~ ~ d ~ a -~ ~ Z l--1 Z -~, ~ D r o p c z f'1 D 'D ~ ~ ~ n ~ ^ C :U ~7 Z C ~ (~ APPENDIX G PHASE I ANALYSIS ~tt® Henshaw Associates, Inc. Environmen-al Engineering Services June 9, 2000 Ms. Carol Anne Painter j l) ~'~ 1 2 2000 Duc Housing Partners, Incorporated -~;-:~!~;S~ri~ a.t>+;td~ ~c '~': 14107 Winchester Boulevard, Suite H Los Gatos, CA 95032 Re: Phase I Preliminary Site Assessment and Limited Soil Quality Investigation Gellert Boulevard, South San Francisco, California Project No.: 268.A.01 Dear Ms. Painter: We are pleased to submit a draft of our Phase I Preliminary Site Assessment and limited soil quality investigation report for the above referenced project. Should you have anv questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Henshaw Associates, Inc. Dennis Laduzinsky, C.E.G./R.E.A. Senior Project Manager Copies: Addressee (1) G:`Piles~I68 Gellcn Bhd. PSA' 791 ~-OO ~~pd 0619.'00 11875 Dublin Boulevard, Suite A-200 • Dublin, CA 94568 • Tel: 925/551-7272 Fax: 925/551-7464 NA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................. 1 2.0 SITE SETTING ................................. ...................2 2.1 Site Location ............................ ... ................2 2.2 Geology .......................................... .............2 3.0 SITE HISTORY ............................~.............................2 3.1 Aerial Photography Review ........... .......................... 3 3.1.1 Project Site ..................... ........... ........... 4 3.1.2 Surrounding Area .... ._` ................................... 4 3.2 Agency File Reviews ...:.....~ :':~:~ ............................ 5 3.3 Sandbom Map Review ........ .. \ :............................. 5 4.0 REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ............................. 5 .-~ 5.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS ..:. ~! ...................................... 9 5.1 Project Site Reconnaissance ......................................... 9 5.2 Surrounding Vicinity ..........:.................................... 9 6.0 SOIL QUALITY INVESTIGATION ....................................... 10 6.1 Investigation Procedures ........................................... 10 6.2 Investigation Results .............................................. 10 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................:................................ 11 8.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................11 REFERENCES TABLE Pl~use I Prelimitrnry Site Assessment Jirne 9, 2000 South San Francisco, California G: IFites1368V 9/~-00. uyd HA 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES This report presents the results of a Phase I preliminary site assessment (PSA) performed for the Gellert Boulevard property in South San Francisco, California. The site, shown on the Site Location Map (Figure 1), consists of an approximate 20-acre parcel located on the west side of Gellert Boulevard, north of Westborough Boulevard. Henshaw Associates, Inc., (Henshaw) has endeavored to perform this PSA has been performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice Designation E 1527-98. The purpose of the PSA has been to acquire and review information regarding the history of activities on the site and adjacent areas to evaluate the potential. for on-site soil or groundwater contamination. It is understood that Duc Housing Partners, Incorporated plans to purchase the site and construct a residential subdivision. c ~~._ ~\ ~~ This investigation was performed by Katherine Dayem, Environmental Engineer and Dennis Laduzinsky, C.E.G./R.E.A. Mr. Laduz_insky is registered as an Environmental Assessor by the State of California. Our scope of work for the investigation was presented in our March 21, 2000 proposal, and included the following services • A reconnaissance of the site and near vicinity performed on April 6, 2000; • Discussions with regulatory officials and review of regulatory agency publications and files, as applicable; • A review of historic aerial photographs of the site; • Collection and analysis of two composite soil samples; and • Preparation of this report. Phase I Preliminary Site Assessment Jz~ne 9, ZODU South San Francisco, California G: I Filesl2681 i 915-00. a pd 1 NA 3.1.1 Project Site In 1946, the date of the earliest available photograph, the site was vacant hillside land, located on a southeast trending ridge. In 1955, site conditions were generally unchanged. In 1958, dirt roads and numerous debris flows were visible throughout the site. In 1961, the hillside in the present location of the site was being cut down as part of a large quarry operation southeast of the site. In the three photographs from 1963 to 1969, cutting and grading operations continued on the site. In 1972, site conditions were generally unchanged. Iri 1975, the southwest corner of the site appeared to be lower than the surrounding area, possibly serving as a drainage area at the base of the slope. In l 977, site conditions were generally unchanged. In 1979, massive grading had occurred on most of the site, which sloped east with a flat area approximately halfway down the slope. In 1981, a small, rectangular structure was centrally located on the east side of the site. In l 983, the structure was no longer present. In the three photographs from 1985 to 1989, site conditions were generally unchanged. In 1991, the northern portion of the site was graded. In the three photographs from 1993 to 1997, site conditions e e generally unchanged. 3.1.2 Surrounding Area In 1946, the surrounding area consisted of=va ac of hillside land. East-west trending canyons were located to the north and south of the site. A road, near the present location of Interstate 280, vas located approximately 500 feet east of the site. In 1955, residential development was in progress approximately 1000 feet east of the site. In 1958, conditions in the surrounding area were generally unchanged. In 1961, a large quarry operation, which cut and flattened hills on the site and surrounding area, was present southeast of the site. Structures associated with a possible ranch were visible in the canyon south of the site. In 1963, Interstate 280 was constructed east of the site. Westborough Boulevard was constructed in the canyon south of the site, which had been filled. In 1966, grading was in progress on the adjacent property to the west and most of the adjacent hillsides. In _1969, a commercial building and parking lot was located on the adjacent property south of the site. Grading was in progress on the adjacent property east of the site. In 1972, residential development vas in progress east of Interstate 280. Building pads and streets were visible on the adjacent property to the west. In 1975, grading continued on the adjacent property to the east; and development continued on the adjacent property to the west. In 1977, conditions in the surrounding area were generally unchanged. In 1979, Gellert Boulevard was constructed along the eastern site boundary. Filling and grading operations were visible on the property northeast of the site, across Gellert Boulevard. In 1981, construction of a second commercial building was in progress on the property adjacent to the south side of the site. In Phase 1 Preliminary Site Assessmeitf June 9, 2000 So:rtlz San Francisco, Calrjornia G: IFilesL~63V9/5-00. a pd 3 HA • CERCLIS: No sites were listed within a'/4-mile radius. • CERCLA NFRAP List (CERC-NFRAP): No sites were listed within a''/z-mile radius. • RCRA Corrective Action Report (CORRACTSI: No sites were listed within a 1'/<-mile radius. • RCRA-permitted treatment. storage. and disposal facilities (RCRIS-TSD): No sites were listed within a'/4-mile radius. • RCRA Large Quantity Generators of Hazardous Waste (RCRIS-LOGj: No sites were listed within a %-mile radius. \, ,_ • RCRA Small Quantity Generators of Hazardous Waste (RCRIS-SQG): Three sites were listed within a '/~-mile radius. Two sites, Exxon Service Station at 2296 Vltestborough Blvd., arici Westborough Arco at 2300 Westborough Blvd., are discussed in the LUST database~ection below. The remaining site, Walgreens at 2238 Westborough Blvd, does not appear to represent a significant potential to impact soil or groundwater quality at the subject site due to its topographic location relative to the subject site. • Emer~encv Response Notification Svstem (ERNS): The site was not listed. • State-Equivalent Priority List (Annual Workplan Sites ~AWP]~: No sites were listed within a 1'/4-mile radius. • State-Equivalent CERCLIS List (Cal-Sites): No sites were listed within a 1'/a- mile radius. • California Hazardous Materials Incident Report Svstem (CHMIRS~: No sites were listed within a 1'/4-mile radius. • CORTESE: Eleven sites were listed within a 1'/a-mile radius. Three sites, Fire Station #4 at 2350 Galway Drive, Exxon Service Station at 2296 Westborough Blvd., and Westboro>_1gh Arco at 2300 Westborough Blvd., are discussed below in Phase I Preliminary Site Assessment June 9, 2000 South San Francisco, California G: IFilesll681791 ~-00. upd 5 /OA listed on the LUST, RCRIS, FINDS, HAZNET, Cortese, and State FID databases. Files available at the SMCEHSA indicated that a leaking tank was confirmed in October 1987. Remediation of the site included excavation of impacted soil, installation of seven vapor extraction wells, and quarterly groundwater monitoring of four monitoring wells, which is still in progress. Groundwater is reported to flow in a northeast direction. Based on the available information, the property does not appear to represent a significant potential to impact soil or groundwater quality at the subject site. • State Hazardous Substance Storage Containers (UST): Five sites were listed within a''/z-mile radius. Two sites, Fire Station #4 and Exxon Service Station, are discussed in the LUST database section above. Prestige Stations Inc #624 at 2300 Westborough Blvd was reported to have five fuel USTs and one waste oil UST ~-, installed in 1968 and 1979. SMEHSA.information for the site is filed under the the current business, Westborough Arco, which is discussed in the LUST database section above. The remaining two sites do not appear to represent a significant potential to impact soil or groundwater quality at the subject site due to their topographic locations relativ~to the subject site. • California Bond'Expenditure Plan: No sites were listed within a 1'/4-mile radius. • _State Facility Inventory Database (CA FID): Three sites were listed within a'/~- mile radius. The sites were previously discussed under the LUST database summary. • Superfund Consent Decrees (CONSENT): No sites were listed within a 1'/4-mile radius. • Records of Decision (ROD): No sites were listed within a 1'/4-mile radius. • USEPA Facility Index System (FINDSI: The site was not listed. • U S Department of Transvortation Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System HMIRS~: The site vas not listed. Phase I Prelimfnury Site Assessment Jane 9, ?000 South San Francisco, California G: IFilesl?68179lS-00. upd 7 NA South BaY Site Management Systems (South Bay Region 2): The site was not listed. 5.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS Current site conditions were derived from a reconnaissance of the site and near vicinity performed by Henshaw on April 6, 2000. Photographs from the reconnaissance are attached at the end of this report. 5.1 Proiect Site Reconnaissance At the time of our investigation, the site consisted of a steep; graded hillside, sloping east to a relatively flat portion of the site located adjacent.t\ ellert Boulevard (Photographs 1 and 2). A number of small slope failures have occurred on'ihe~hillside (Photograph 3). Four graded benches with concrete drainage-control s~vales are loc<~teci on the slope, running north to south. Power lines are located on the western portion of the property (Photographs 1 and 4). The southern portion of the site consists of a-level area located adjacent to a driveway which leads to off-site businesses, and a thickly vegetated area~urrounded by a berm (Photograph 4). Piles of concrete debris and trash are located on the site in this area. We were not able to access the thickly vegetated area during otir reconnaissance due to the dense vegetation. Piles of concrete debris are located on the northeast portion of the site,. and some miscellaneous debris is located throughout the site. An asphalt pad, surrounded by an area covered with wood chips and pine needles, is centrally located on the eastern side of the site (Photograph 1). This area may be used for Christmas tree sales. The southwest portion of the site, located between Westborough Boulevazd and the main portion of the site, was enclosed with achain-linl: fence. 5.2 Surrounding Vicinity The surrounding area consists of residential and commercial developments. Gellert Boulevard is located adjacent to the north and east property lines. The surrounding area east of Gellert Boulevard is developed with shopping centers. Townhouses and single-family homes are located on the adjacent property west of the site. A driveway, which provides access to a fast food restaurant, a vacant lot, and a dental building that are located south of the site, is located adjacent to the southeast portion of the site. Phase 1 Prelimrnnry Site Assessment June 9, 2000 South San Francisco, Calrjvrnra G: I Fi/es l?681 i 91 ~-00. a pd 9 NA Due to the unexpected, elevated levels of arsenic reported in the composite samples, the composite sample collected from a depth of four feet was re-analyzed for arsenic at Chromalab of Pleasanton, California. The test result reported by Chromalab for the sample was 2.6 mg/kg of arsenic; typical of normal background arsenic levels in the San Francisco Bay Area. It has been our recent experience that other samples unrelated to this project, also reported by Columbia Analytical services to have elevated levels of arsenic, have shown similar low levels of arsenic when re-analyzed at other laboratories. As such, it is our opinion that the elevated levels of arsenic reported by Columbia Analytical services are not actually representative of actual site conditions. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ~\ ., This PSA was conducted to identify areas of potential env\ nmental concern within the site and near-vicinity that may affect on-site soil and groundwater quality. Our review indicates that the site and surrounding area underwent massive grading in the 1970s and 1980s as part of a regional mass-grading operations. The site appears to have been created by cutting a former hillside, although some fill may have been placed in~e'southeastern corner of the site. The southeast portion of the site, adjacent to a driveway leading to off-site businesses, is marked by piles of concrete and other debris. Two composite soil samples, collected at depths of one and four feet, did not contain TPH as gasoline or diesel, purgeable aromatics, pesticides, PCBs, or VOCs above the MRLs, with the exception of 15 mg/kg of a high boiling pont hydrocarbon, quantified as diesel. The samples did not contain metals above the PRGs or TTLCs. Based on the analytical results, soil quality on the southeast portion of the site does not appear to have been impacted by local dumping. No indication of hazardous materials use or storage at or near the site.was discovered in the aerial photography review, interviews, EDR report, site reconnaissance, or local agency file review perfornzed as part of this investigation. In summary, our assessment did not indicate the presence of environmental concerns that would preclude residential development of the site. 8.0 LIMITATIONS The purpose of an environmental assessment is to reasonably evaluate the potential for or actual impact of past practices on a given site area. In performing an environmental assessment, it is Phase I Prelimirtar~~ Site Assessment June 9, 1000 Sotrlh San Francisco, California G:lFi/es12631i9/.i-00.npd t 1 NA REFERENCES Aerial Photographs Pacific Aerial Survey: Date Flight No. Scale June 23, 1997 AV5434-104-14/15 1':12,000. September 7, 1995 AV4916-4-16/17 1:12,000 August 27, 1993 AV4515-4-17/18 1:12,000 October 30, 1991 AV4168-1-10/] 1 1:24,000 June 19,1989 AV3556-3-17/18 1:12,000 March 24,1987 AV3078-4-7 .,1:9,600 September 14, 1985 AV2670 3',1;8/19 1:12,000 June 6, 1983 AV2265-3-16/17 ~ 1: ] 2,000 • June 19, 1981 AV2020-3- 17/18 1:12,000 May 30, 1979 AV 1705-3-20/21 1:12,000 May 27, 1977 ~ AV13~6-4-20/21 1:12,000 May 28, 197 AVLS8.8_ 17/18 1:12,000 May 10, 1972 AV 104-4-20/21 1:12,000 October 29, 1969 AV933-4-17/18 1:12,000 May 14, 1966 -'~ AV710-6-27/28 1:36,000 July 9, 1963 ~ AV~50-5-26/27 1:36;000 June 20, 1961 AV432-4-21/22 1:12;000 Apri123, 1958 AV279-5-28/29 1:12,000 May 10, 195 AV 170-4-19/20 1:10,000 July 29, 1946 AV9-12-3/4 1:23,600 Contacts: San IVlateo County Office of Environmental Health Contact: Michelle Powell South San Francisco Planning Department Contact: Mike Upston P/case I Preli~ni~rary Site Assessment J:rne 9, 2000 South San Francisco, California G.• lFiles1268179! 5-00. a pd HA REFERENCES (continued) South San Francisco Building Department and Fire Prevention - Contact: Staff South San Francisco Fire Department Contact: Staff Publications and Reports: Crane, Ron. Unpublished geologic map of Cuttings Wharf Quadrangle. Sims, J. D., K. F. Fox, Jr., J. A. Bartow and E. J. Helley. Preliminary Geologic Map Of Solano Coztnty and Parts of Napa, Contra Costa, Marin and Yolo Counties, California. 1973. ~~ --- U.S. Geological Survey (modified to CD-ROM format by Wildflower Productions). 7.5 Minute Topographic tLlup, San Francisco South Quadrangle, California. 1997. Phase I Preliminary Site Assessment June 9, 2DOU South San Francisco, California G: IFilesl?6317915-00. upd 7 ~N :, _ _ `` .. ~~ :...; Scale 1:24,000 1 1R 0 1 Mile 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Feet 1 .5 0 1 Kilometcr Source: TOPO!. Wildflower Productions. 1999 No Dus lieriaiao Approved Duc: 060600 Figue . Renshaw Associates Inc. D~i~: DS SITE LOCATION MAP I , Services ineerin l En t i E D"°'d ~ GeUat Boulevard PSA Pmjen g g a ronmen nv CT.ecS~ed: 1CD South Saa Fnocixo, California 11875 DcClin 9Nd., Suda !4200 • Dublin, Caffemia 4iS68 Du~G 61e: 79110 268.A01 ~'~ ., _ -~ r,~ ~a . 0 -+ 0 G7 D NA Photograph 1: Subject site, viewed from southeast corner. The western portion of the site slopes to the flat eastern portion of the site adiacent.to Gellert Boulevard (risht). .. 'r Plruse I Prelimirrury Site Assessment Jarne 9, ?000 South Sun Francisco, Cal jornia G: I Files 13631-91 ~-00. a pd Q X 7_ W a Q ®; Environmental :Data Resources,lnc. an ~edr-company The EDR-Radius MapTM Report Gellert Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd South San Francisco, CA 94080 Inquiry Number: 476544.1s March 22, 2000 The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com ,, :. _ _ ?. _ - TABLE OF_ CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary-------------------------~------------------------------ ES1 Topographic Map--------------------------------------------------------. 2 GeoCheck Summary -Not Requested Overview Map-------------------------------------------- --------------- DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Map Summary-All Sites--------------------------------------------------- 5 Map Findings------------------------------------------------------------ ~ Orphan Summary--------------------------------------------------------• 29 APPENDICES GeoCheck Version 2.1 -Not Requested Government Records Searched I Data Currency Tracking Addendum_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Al Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer and Other Information This Report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources and Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, quality, suitability, or completeness of said information or the information contained in this report. The customer shall assume full responsibility for the use of this report NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, SHALL APPLY AND EDR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF SUCH WARRANTIES. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. COPYRIGHT (C) 1998 BY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks used herein are the property of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. TC476544.1s Page 1 - -. .. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527.97. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS GELLERT BLVD/WESTBOROUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 37.646500 - 37' 38' 47.4" Longitude (West): 122.452200 - 122' 27' 7.9" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10 UTM X (Meters): 548326.7 UTM Y (Meters): 4166531.0 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: 2437122-F4 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH, CA Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. SURROUNDING SITES• DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-97 search radius around the target property for the following Databases: FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL:___.__..__ __ r:-; National Priority List Delisted NPL:._______________ NPL Deletions CERCLIS____________________.Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP:_________.____. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CORRACTS:_________________Gorrective Action Report RCRIS-TSD__________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LQG:_. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS:_______________________ Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP:-------------•---------- AWP ________________ Cai-Sites_ Cal-Sites ____ CHMIRS:_____________________ Galifornia Hazardous Material Incident Report System Toxic Pits____________________ Tnxic Pits SWF/LF:_.___.__.___.___._.__ State Landfill WMUDS_____________________. WMUDSlSWAT Ca. BEP______________________ CA Bond Exp. Plan FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT:_____.____.____.__. Superfund (CERCIA) Consent Decrees TG376544.1s EXECUTIVE SUh1MARY 1 =EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~. :> ROD-------------------------- ROD FINDS:_______________________ Faci/ity Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS:______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MLTS:_______________________. Material Licensing Tracking System MINES:______________________. Mines Master Index File NPL Lien:____________________ NPL Liens PADS:_______________________ PCB Activity Database System RAATS:._____________________ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS:_ _. _ __ __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _. Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA:_______________________. Tnxic Substances Control Act STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST:_________________________Abnveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities Ca. WDS_____________________ CA WDS CA SLIC:____________________. CA SLIC regions. SMS R_2:___.__.._________.__ South Bay Site Management System EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Coal Gas:____________________Fnrmer Manufactured gas (Coal Gas) Sites. SURROUNDING SITES: DATABASES WITH MAPPED SITES Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis.. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. EDR's definition of a site with an elevation equal to the target property includes a tolerance of +/- 10 feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property (by more than 10 feet}. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RCRIS: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database includes selected information on sites that generate, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Act. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the RCRIS-SC1G list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/01/1999 has revealed that there are 3 RCRIS-SQG sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist 1 Dir Map 1D Page EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD/G 1/8 - 1/4 SSE D17 1 J WESTBOROUGH ARCO 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 -1/4SSE DZ1 14 WALGREFNS 884 1238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4 SE E27 18 TC475544.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 -`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~~ ~ -_ STATE ASTM STANDARD CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with USTs having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 11 Cortese sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page FIRE STATION /14 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4W A4 7 EXXON 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD # 1/8 - 1/4SSE 016 11 WESTBOROUGH ARCO 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE 021 14 UNOCAL 3964 CALLAN BLVD 1/2 - 1 WNW G42 Z3 DRS TIRE & AUTO CARE 1010 KING DR 1/2 - 1 WNW G43 23 SHELL 3999 SKYLINE BLVD 1/2 - 1 SW 44 24 SKYLINE COLLEGE 3300 COLLEGE DRIVE 1 - 2 SSW 46 25 Lower Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page CALIFORNIA GOLF CLUB 844 W ORANGE AVE 1- 2 ENE 45 24 SUN STREAM HOMES (NO STREET NBR) TAYLOR 1 - 2 E 47 27 PLATH NURSERY 250 TAYLOR DR 1 - 2 E 48 27 ROD MCLELLAN COMPANY 1450 EL CAM/NO REAL 1 - 2 NNE 49 28 NOTIFY 65: Notify 65 records contain facility notifications about any release that could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Proposition 65 database. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page ARCO STATION #6073 2300 WESTBOROUGH 1/8 - 1/4SSE 019 13 LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/0312000 has revealed that there are 7 LUST sites within approximately 0.75 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA # 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4W AZ 7 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA # 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4W A3 7 FIRE STATION if4 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4W A4 7 EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD/G 1/8 - 1/4SSE 017 ~ 1 EXXON 7-3673 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 114SSE 018 13 ARCO #6073 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE 020 14 WESTBOROUGH ARCO 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE 021 14 TC476544.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ., EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ' '~ - UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 6 UST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page FIRE STATION #4 2350 GALWAY PLACE 1/8 - 1/4W A7 8 K MART ENTERPRISES 2255 GELLERT BLVD. 1!8 - 1/4N B8 9 KMART #3451 2255 GELLERT BLVD. 1/8 - 1/4 N B9 9 EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD/G 1/8 - 1/4SSE D17 11 PRESTIGE STATIONS INC #624 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D23 15 Lower Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map tD Page BEKINS MOVING 8~ STORAGE 99 HYDE CT. 1/4 - 1/2N 41 22 CA FID: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the Ca. FID list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 Ca. FID sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist !Dir Map ID Page FIRE STATION N0.4 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4W A5 8 EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 2296 WESTBORDUGH BLVD/G 1/8 - 1/4SSE D17 11 ARCO FACILITY #6073 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D22 15 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMEIJTAL HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DISC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-California manifests 8 continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, 8 disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency A review of the HAZNET list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 18 HAZNET sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation I Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8 - 1/4 W A6 8 EXXON CO USA #73673 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD/G 1/8 - 1/4S C10 9 JOSEPH L BAUER DDS 2276 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D11 10 JEAN CHU DDS 2276 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D12 10 ONE HOUR MARTINIZING 2258 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D14 11 WESTBOROUGH ARCO 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D21 14 ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4SSE D24 17 QUALEX #0884 2238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4 SE E26 17 WALGREENS 884 2238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4 SE E27 18 CHARLES J ZARGANIS DMD APC 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD # 1/8 - 1/4S C29 18 BAY AREA PERIDONTAL GROUP 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD, 1/8 - 1/4S C30 19 TC47654a.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 _ ,- 'EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~ l' Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist !Dir Map ID Page ROBERT J GOLDEN DDS RAYMOND J. SHERIDAN, D.D.S. RICHARD C ROBERT DDS MS STALIN CHU DDS A.C. ABORDO DENTAL CORP. RAVANERA DENTAL OFFICE Lower Elevation 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 2085 GELLERT BLVD Address WESTBOROUGH PET HOSPITAL 2228 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8 - 1/4S C31 19 1/8 - 1/4S C32 19 1/8-1/4S C33 20 1/8 - 1/4S C34 20 1!8 - 114S C35 20 1/4 -1/2N F39 21 Dist /Dir Map ID Page 1/8 - 1/4SE E28 18 BI:Hazardous Materials Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Generator, Underground Storage tanks A review of the Ca. BI list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 8 Ca. BI sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation FIRE STATION #4 WESTBOROUGH 1 HOUR CLEANERS EXXON SERVICE STATION #7-3673 WESTBOROUGH ARCO #6073 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE #540 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE #540 DRY CLEAN WAY PGS~E SERRAMONTE SUBSTATION Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page 2350 GALWAY 1/8 - 1/4 W Al 7 2258 WESTBOROUGH 1/8 - 1/4 SSE D13 10 2296 WESTBOROUGH 1/8 - 1/4 SSE D15 11 2300 WESTBOROUGH 1/8 - 1/4 SSE D25 17 2245 GELLERT 1/4 - 1/2N B36 21 2245 GELLERT 1/4 - 1/2N 637 21 2223 GELLERT 1/4 - 1/2N 38 21 KING /GELLERT 1/4 - 1/2 N F40 22 TC476544.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 . _ _ ,. - EXECUTIVE,SUMMARY .r~ __ _,.~ _ . .._ _ _ .: _. Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name Database(s) OYSTER POINT DUMP Cal-Sites SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL DUMP CERGNFRAP OLCESE WMUDS,SWF/LF O'BRIAN CORP SITE SWF/LF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL DUMP SWFlLF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER MRF/TS SWFlLF LA HONDA OIL FIELD LUST SERVICE ZONE THE LUST SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY OF LUST UNITED AIRLINES MOC LUST FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIO LUST STATION N0.7 UST DR FRANK CASANOVA DDS HAZNET C S TUKEMAN, DDS i3< EP GOODMAN,DDS HAZNET DANIEL S FUNG DDS HAZNE7 EDWARD P VAHEY DMD MS HAZNET JIHAD BACHA DDS HAZNET SIERRA MONTE PLAZA HAZNET CITY OF DALY CITY-SERRA THEATER HAZNET DEBORRAH RAVAL DMD HAZNET PANG?IO DENTAL OFFICE HAZNET 1X PG&E HAZNET 1X BELOTTI, ELAINE HAZNET CHANEY DENTAL X-RAY HAZNET FAUSTO R MONCADA DDS HAZNET MARIA CARMEN SABOLBORO, DDiV1 HAZNET DR BUDZIAK DR CHOI DDS HAZNET UNKNOWN CA SLIC SHEARWATER DEVELOPMENT.FORMER US STEEL CA SLIC TC476544.1 s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 476544.1 s -Henshaw Associates J ~ Jlfl ~ !/, y~! \ i \`)1! r ! ! 1 - ,/ / ~_r. ~O \~ f /~ \ n i O 7Q ~ ~ ~ +F •` A ~ ~ •~ i f^ WS .~ p f D s ? d' ~Yf < 1 G D 1 ~ ~~ - O J r r y~l s '•`~ c t i ~~ ~ ~, .f, S .,, it o 0 fF oe - ~~` D ~ •~' S' O ro O ~~~ G 9 •` ' 'sad- 1 1 ( \ \ 1 `` E ~ i ~ ~ F f ~ sa - J~ - ~ 1G \\ / ~o v r,y .> k S ~~ ~ Source: US Geological Survoy 1-Degree Digital Elevation Model Compiled 09/15192 /~/ -Major Roads /~/ -Contour lines (25 toot Interval unless otherwise shown) /1,~ -Waterways -Earthquake faun lines ~ i. 1 TARGET PROPERTY: Gellert CUSTOMER: Henshaw Associates ADRESS: Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd CONTACT: Dennis Laduzinsky CITY/STATE/ZIP: South San Francisco CA 94080 INQUIRY #: 476544.1s LAT/LONG: 37.64650 / 122.45220 DATE: March 22, 2000 OVERVIEW MAP - 476544.1 s -Henshaw Associates ~s ' pF O M !`p T sr9 t E• P q / y~r ~'ri r s r 0 O F ~~ y 9p G E~ ~ C i i o ~ 9 > ~ 9 F W~ i 7l l~ S o d~` Oo ~ B p > S ~ y, R 4 i O a~ K ~ DP 8 C ~ B c ~ ~ / q O ' J ~ `0 Q A 1~~`' S '~. 4h' ~t ` ~, / ~ ~' r `a q a EAl p ~ Sa Q O ` O ~ s'~y K F C 3' y PP ~ G `F .~'aj mH I.Q CP DR ~ , c t ~ /~ ' ti P EJ E~ n ~ ~ `~ A ~t Target Property ~ Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites ~ 7!1 1 Z rue• X11 Power transmission lines Areas of Concern N Oil & Gas pipelines 100•yearflood zone ® 500-year flood zone Wetlands per National Wetlands Inventory (1994) TARGET PROPERTY: Gellert CUSTOMER: Henshaw Associates ADDRESS: Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd CONTACT: Dennis Laduzinsky CITY/STATE/ZIP: South San Francisco CA 94080 INQUIRY li: 476544.1s LAT/LONG: 37.6465 / 122.4522 DATE: March 22, 2000 11.:48 am DETAIL MAP - 476544.1s -Renshaw Associates ~ o 2 ~ ~Z ~ m ~ ~ u b W W ' ' p i N ~OQ C ~`. ~i{' W ' 13 4y Y ~ ' ~ ' ~ - .. 6REFMOq~EDq O s S~Ppt ~5`~E r~ ~`g ~ o ~~ ~ Y 1r Z ~~ s ~~pyp pP g F~„ _ ~ o ~ ~p,Ep O 9 z fAtfifAX WAY 9 ~ Wlll 5 C1 N `=i OP Ea~~ C~ = °'J~ ~ ~ 9 ° y GQ.E " ~h ~ pLE ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ o ~9 m °o 0 A m ~ ~~ ~~q ~ ~J' 1 78080 UGH PfG B1~jULLO1N0 ~~~a~ ~ .. ' n E ~ ; ~ < ~ r ~ / KR~STIE ~~~ Z o WREN CT RP~ ~ ~! m O~ ..~16NT CT ~ R9A R'4N k7A~p o¢ Q 3 k7AA~T v C~!`~ p~,N ~ ° 91~! ~ ~~Stb 3~ O IABER7Y T ~+ -C10 BANTAYLN NtA~ ~ rYESTe~ ~~ oeouaH~ gHSCHOOI ~6~00Q,pV ~`'' CF~~9 `~~Py f 7io o VO !4' l~`O ~ ~Ay ~' o cF ~t Target Property ~ Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) i Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites v _..__ N Power transmission lines Areas of Conce-n n/ Oi18 Gas pipelines ® t00-year flood zone ® 500-year flood zone TARGET PROPERTY: Gellert CUSTOMER: HeruhawAssociates ADDRESS: Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd CONTACT: Dennis Laduzinsky GITY/STATE2IP: South San Francisco CA 94080 INQUIRY;"i: 476544.is LAT/LONG: 37.6465 / 122.4522 DATE: March 22, 2000 11:49 am - _ -:.. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY ;- - _ r Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 Plotted FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delisted NPL 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRIS-TSD 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.500 0 3 0 NR NR 3 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cal-Sites 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 CHMIRS 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cortese 1.250 0 3 0 3 5 11 Notify 65 1.250 0 1 0 0 0 1 Toxic Pits 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Landfill 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0 LUST 0.750 0 7 0 0 NR 7 UST 0.500 0 5 1 NR NR 6 CA Bond Exp. Plan 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 CA FID 0.500 0 3 0 NR NR 3 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROD 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CA WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CA SLIC 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0 HAZNET 0.500 0 17 1 NR NR 18 Business Inventory 0.500 0 4 4 NR NR 8 TC476544.1 s Page 5 - ~, MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY-' - - Database Search Target Distance Total Property (Miles) < 118 118 -114 1l4 -112 1/2 -1 > 1 Plotted SMS R_2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Coal Gas 1.250 AQUIFLOW -see EDR GeoCheck Summary TP =Target Property NR =Not Requested at this Search Distance ' Sites may be listed in more than one database 0 0 0 0 0 0 TC476544.1s Page 6 Map ID :MAP FINDINGS - _. Direction _ . Distance ' Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Coai Gas Site Search: No site was found in a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database. Al FIRE STATION #4 ~ Ca. BI S102445338 West 2350 GALWAY N/A 1/8-1/4 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Program Number. 2160 Region: SAN MATED BI Program Number: 2300 AZ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA #4 LUST S103879275 West 2350 GALWAY DR - NIA 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher LUST Region 2: Region: 2 File Number. 41-0818 Entered Date: 2/2/94 Facility Status: Signed off, remedial aciion completed or deemed unnecessary Maximum Soil Concentration: 2600 Maximum Groundwater Impact: Not reported Current Benzene in Groundwater: Not reported MTBE Contamination Level: Not reported Maximum MTBE Groundwater: Not reported A3 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA # LUS7 ~ S103890938 West 2350 GALWAY DR N/A 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher State LUST: Cross Street: WRIGHT CT Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Diesel Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Soil only Status: Not reported Abate Method: No Action Taken - no action has as yet been taken at the site Review Date: 09/04/1997 Confirm Leak: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: 9/27/1994 Pollution Char. Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: 9/4/1997 Release Date: 06/23!1993 A4 FIRE STATION #4 West 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 829 Higher LUST S104164301 Cortese NIA TC476544.1s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number FIRE STATION #4 (Continued) LUST San Mateo County: Facility ID: EE0003175 Region: Local ID: 550125 Case Type: Initial Date: 2/2194 Closed Date: Facility Status: Certification of Closure lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0818 Region: CORTESE SAN MATEO Soit only 9/4/97 S1041tr4301 AS FIRE STATION N0.4 West 2350 GALWAY DR 1/8-1/4 SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher FID: Facility ID: 41002460 Regulate ID: Reg By: Active Underground Storage Tank Location Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Status: Active Facility Te(: Mail To: Not reported P. O. BOX 711 SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Contact: Not reported Contact Tel: DUNS No: Not reported NPDES No: Creation: 10/22/93 Modified: EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Ca. FID 5101593904 . NIA Not reported Not reported (415)877-8964 Not reported Not reported 00!00/00 A6 CITY OF SO SAN FRANCISCO West 2350 GALWAY DR 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CA0000956888 Tepaid: Contact: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.1500 Category: Other empty containers 30 gallons or more Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: P O BOX 711 SOUTH 5AN FRANCISCO. CA 94083 County San Mateo HAZNET S100858782 NIA CAD009466392 (000) 000-0000 7 A7 FIRE STATION #4 West 2350 GALWAY PLACE 1/8-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 829 Higher UST 0001594764 N/A TC476544.1s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site - MAP FINDINGS._. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number FIRE STATION #4 (Continued) 0001594764 State UST: Facility ID: 30175 Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 4 ' Tank Capacity: 350 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: None Contact Name: RUSSELL LEE, ASSIST FIRE CHIEF Telephone: (415) 877-8950 Total Tanks: 1 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 2 Other Type: FIRE STATION B8 K MART ENTERPRISES UST 0001602994 North 2255 GELLERT BLVD. N/A 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 95129 1158 Higher State UST: Facility ID: 14463 Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 4144 Tank Capacity: 500 Year Installed: 1978 Tank Used for. WASTE Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Tank Constrdn: 3/16" gauge Leak Detection: Pressure Test Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (415) 223-2214 Total Tanks: 1 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 2 Other Type: AUTO REPAIR B9 KMART 113451 UST 0001594792 North 2255 GELLERT BLVD. - N!A 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1158 Higher State UST: Facility ID: 67234 Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 1 Tank Capacity: 500 Year Installed: 1978 Tank Used for: WASTE ' Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: /16 2 inches Leak Detection: V'~sual Coniact Name: J.D. SELOOVER Telephone: (415) 952-2600 Total Tanks: 1 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 2 Other Type: WASTE OIL C10 EXXON CO USA #73673 South 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVDIGELLERT 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1158 Higher HAZNET S102806918 N/A TC476544.1s Page 9 Map ID Dlredion Distance Distance (ft) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS `- EDR ID number Database(s) EPA ID Number EXXON CO USA #73673 (Continued) HAZNET: Gepaid: CAD981411275 Tepaid: Contact: EXXON CO USA Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.4587 Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Meihod: Treatment, Tank Mailing Address: PO BOX 2180 HOUSTON, TX 77252 - 2180 County San Mateo CAD028409019 (713) 656-7761 Los Angeles D11 JOSEPH L BAUER DDS SSE 2276 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1200 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000167911 Tepaid: Contact: JOSEPH BAUER DDS Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.0000 Category: Disposal Method: Treatment, Tank Mailing Address: 2276 WESTBOROUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo HAZNET CAL000082530 (415) 435-6771 Santa Clara D12 JEAN CHU DDS SSE 2276 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1200 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000128739 Tepaid: Contact: JEAN CHU DDS Telephone: Gen County: San Maleo Tsd County: Tons: 0.0000 Category: Disposal Method: Treatment, Tank Mailing Address: 2276 WESTBOROUGFi BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo HAZNET S1028tIfiB18 S102825090 N/A S103971837 N/A CAL000082530 (650)589-8988 Santa Clara D13 WESTBOROUGH 1 HOUR CLEANERS SSE 2258 WESTBOROUGH 1/8-114 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1207 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED 81 Program Number: 2220 Program Number: 2161 Ca. BI S1022~883 N/A TC476544.1s Page 10 Map ID - MAP FINDINGS - -, Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 014 ONE HOUR MARTIN127NG SSE 2258 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1207 Higher 015 SSE 118-114 1210 Higher 016 SSE 118-1l4 1210 Higher EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HAZNET 1001132991 NIA HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000008953 Tepa(d: CAT000613893 Contact: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Los Angeles Tons: 0.0975 Category: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/l Disposal Method: Not reported Mailing Address: 2258 WESTBOROUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 - 5405 County San Mateo EXXON SERVICE STATION #7-3673 Ca. BI 2296 WESTBOROUGH S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI EXXON ' 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD # 2300 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0216 Region: CORTESE Cortese S102269887 NIA S102429494 NIA 017- EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 SSE 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVDIGELLERT 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANC, CA 94080 1210 Higher RCRIS: Owner: EXXON COMPANY USA (415) 555-1212 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER (415)937-2991 Record Date: 05/13/1986 Classification: Small Quantity Generator Program Number. 2161 Program Number: 2201 Program Number. 2300 RCRIS-SQG 1000337861 FINDS CAD981411275 UST Ca. FID LUST TC476544.1s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (fL) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EXXON SERVICE STA710N NO 7-367 (Continued) Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found State LUST: Cross Street: GELLERT BLVD Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Ory Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Misc. Motor Vehicle Fuels Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Other ground water affected Status: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Treat -remove contaminated soil and treat (in cludes spreading or land farming) Review Date: 05/13/1999 Confirm Leak: Not reported Workplan: 7/25/1989 Prelim Assess: 8/23!1989 Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Dale: Not reported Release Date: 05/05/1987 2 41-0216 2/1/89 Post remedial action monitoring in progress 9600 75 Not reported Not reported Not reported FID: Facility ID: 41000232 Regulate ID: Not reported Reg By: Active Underground Storage lank Location Cortese Code: Not reported ~ SIC Code: Not reported Status: Active Facility Tel: Not reported Mail To: Not reported 4550 DACOMA S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Contact: Not reported Contact Tel: Not reported DUNS No: Not reported NPDES No: Not reported Creation: 10/22/93 Modified: 00100/00 EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported State UST: Facility ID: 24080 Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 1 Tank Capacity: 8000 Year Installed: 1969 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: REGULAR Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: ALAN BROOKS Telephone: (415) 589-5656 Total Tanks: 5 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported LUST Region 2: Region: File Number: Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000337861 TC476544.15 Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site -MAP FIND~NGS- EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 7-367 (Continued) 1000337861 Facility ID: 24080 Tank.Num: 2 Container Num: 2 Tank Capacity: 6000 Year Installed: 1969 , Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: PREMIUM Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: ALAN BROOKS Telephone: (415) 589-5656 Total Tanks: 5 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 24080 Tank Num: 3 Container Num: 3 Tank Capacity: 10000 Year Installed: 1969 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: ALAN BROOKS Telephone: (415) 589-5656 Total Tanks: 5 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 24080 Tank Num: 4 Container Num: 4 Tank Capacity: 12000 Year Installed: 1982 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: ALAN BROOKS Telephone: (415) 589-5656 Total Tanks: 5 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 24080 Tank Num: 5 Container Num: 5 Tank Capacity: 1000 Year Installed: 1969 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: ALAN BROOKS Telephone: (415) 589-5656 Total Tanks: 5 Region: Nol reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported D18 EXXON 7-3673 LUST S103557062 SSE 2296 WESTBOROUGH BLVD NiA 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 1210 Higher LUST San Mateo County: Facility ID: EE0003340 Region: SAN MATED Local ID: 550029 Case Type: Other ground water affected Initial Date: 211/89 Closed Date: Not reported Facility Status: Post Remedial Action Monitoring Lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County D19 ARCO STATION #6073 Notify 65 S100179809 SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH NIA 118-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCI, CA 94080 1215 Higher TC476544.1s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (it.) Elevation Site _= MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ARCO STATION #6073 (Continued) S100179809 NOTIFY 65: Date Reported: Not reported Staff Initials: Not reported Board File Number. Not reported Facility Type: No( reported Discharge Date: Not reported Incident Description: 94080 D20 ARCO #6073 LUST S103557063 SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD N/A 118-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 1215 Higher LUST San Mateo County: Facility ID: EE0003340 Region: SAN MATED Local ID: 550008 Case Type: Other ground water affected Initial Date: 2/16/89 Closed Date: Not reported Facility Status: Conduct Remedial investigation, develop feasibility study and approve Remedial Action Plan Lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County D21 WESTBOROUGH ARCO RCRIS-SOG 1000396475 SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD FINDS CAD982484537 118-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANC, CA 94080 LUST 1215 HAZNET Higher Cortese RCRIS: Owner: OLIVER CHIN (415)555-1212 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER (415) 574045 Record Date: 03/22/1990 Classification: Smolt Quantity Generator Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status : No violations Tound State LUST: Cross Street: Not reported Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Unleaded Gasoline Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Other ground water affected Status: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Dispose -remove contaminated soil and dispose in approved site, Vent Soil -bore holes in soil to allow volatilization of contaminants Review Date: 05!13/1999 Confirm Leak: Not reported Woricplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: 7/2!1992 Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Release Date: 02/04/1988 LUST Region 2: Region: 2 File Number: 41-0033 TC476544.1 s Page 14 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ,;: __ ~ . . MAP FINDINGS WESTBOROUGH ARCO (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000396475 Entered Date: 2/16/89 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) in progress Maximum Soil ConcenUation: ~ 40000 • Maximum Groundwater Impact: 999999 Current Benzene in Groundwater: 999999 MTBE Contamination Level: 2000 Maximum MTBE Groundwater. 2000 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAD982484537 Tepaid: CAD009452657 Contact: OLIVER CHIN Telephone: (415) 355-6220 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: San Mateo Tons: 0.7923 Category: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 2300 WESTBOR OUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 -5407 County San Mateo CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0033 Region: CORTESE D22 ARCO FACILITY #6073 Ca. FID SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 1/8-114 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1215 Higher FID: Facility ID: 41000077 Regulate ID: Not repored Reg By: Active Underground Storage Tank Location Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Status: Active Facility Tel: Nol reported Mail To: Not reported P O BOX S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Contact: Not reported Contact Tet: Not reported DUNS No: Not reported ~ NPDES No: Not reported Creation: 10/22/93 Modified: 00/00/00 EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported D23 PRESTIGE STATIONS INC #624 SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-114 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94402 1215 Higher 5101593664 NIA UST 0001596039 NIA TC476544.1s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site " MAP F{NDINGS -~ EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number PRESTIGE STATIONS INC #624 (Continued) 0001596039 State UST: Faclity ID: 27079 _ Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 0000000001 Tank Capacity: 10000 Year Installed: 1979 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Total Tanks: 6 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 27079 Tank Num: 2 Container Num: 0000000002 Tank Capacity: 6000 Year Installed: 1968 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: 0000240 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Total Tanks: 6 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 27079 Tank Num: 3 Container Num: 0000000003 Tank Capacity: 6000 Year Installed: 1968 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: 0000240 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Total Tanks: 6 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 _ Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 27079 Tank Num: 4 Container Num: 0000000004 Tank Capacity: 6000 Year Installed: 1968 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: 0000240 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Total Tanks: 6 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported Facility ID: 27079 Tank Num: 5 Container Num: 0000000005 Tank Capacity: 6000 Year Installed: 1968 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not Reported Tank Constrctn: 0000240 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Total Tanks: 6 Region: Not reported Facility Type: 1 Other Type: Not reported TC476544.1s Page 16 Map 10 Direction Distance Distance (fL) Elevation Site ' -MAP FINDINGS PRESTIGE STATIONS INC #624 (Continued) Facility ID: 27079 Tank Num: 6 Tank Capacity: 280 Tank Used t'or. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Total Tanks: 6 Facility Type: 1 024 ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-1/4 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1215 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000041111 Contact: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY Gen County: San Mateo Tons: 0.2293 Category: Unspecified oil-containing waste Disposal Method: Nol reported Mailing Address: PO BOX 6038 ARTESIA, CA 90702 - 6038 County San Mateo EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0001596039 Container Num: 0000000006 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Constrctn: 0000093 inches Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Region: Not reported Other Type: Not reported HAZNET Tepaid: Telephone: Tsd County: CAD043260702 (213) 466-0494 San Mateo S103950605 NIA D25 WESTBOROUGH ARCO #6073 Ca. BI S100855347 SSE 2300 WESTBOROUGH N/A 1/8-114 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1215 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Program Number: 2160 Region: SAN MATED BI Program Number. 2220 Region: SAN MATED BI Program Number. 2300 E26 QUALEX #0884 HAZNET S703983081 SE 2238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD NIA 1/8-114 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1230 Same HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000169487 Tepaid:. CAD981402522 Contact: QUALEX INC Telephone: (847) 914-3143 Gen County: San Francisco Tsd County: Kem Tons: 0.4711 Category: Photochemicalslphotoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 4020 STIRRUP CREEK DR STE 211 DURHAM, NC 27703 - 9000 County San Francisco TC476544.1 s Page 17 Map ID - MAP FINDINGS - Direction Distance Distance (fL) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number E27 WALGREENS 884 RCRIS-SQG 1001227D69 SE 2238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD F1NDS CAR000043125 1/8-1/4 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 HA2:NET 1230 Same RCRIS: Owner. WALGREEN CO (847j 914-3193 Contact: Not reported Record Date: 07/17/1998 Classification: Small Quantity Generator Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found HAZNET: Gepaid: CAR000043125 Tepaid: CAD981402522 Contact: Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County:. Kem Tons: 0.1668 Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Not reported Mailing Address: 2238 WESTBOROUGH BLVD S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo E28 WESTBOROUGH PET HOSPITAL HAZNET S1 02 81 647 0 SE 2228 WESTBOROUGH BLVD N!A 1/e-1/4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 00000 1249 Lower HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000089193 Tepaid: CAD981161367 Contact: JAY L SHELOFSKY VMD Telephone: (650) 726-5484 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Marin Tons: 0.1251 Category: Photochemicafs/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Not reported Mailing Address: 2228 WESTBOROUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo C29 CHARLES J ZARGANIS DMD APC HAZNET 5102817858 South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD #100 N/A 1/8-114 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher TC4765-i4.1s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA 10 Number CHARLES J ZARGANIS DMD APC (Continued) S102817858 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000097780 Tepaid: CAT080013352 Contact: CHARLES J ZARGANIS Telephone: (415) 583-0550 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Los Angeles Tons: 0.2085 Category: Unspec~ed oil-containing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 100 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 -5402 County San Mateo C30 BAY AREA PERIDONTAL GROUP HA2NET 5103645090 South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD, #1056 N1A 118-114 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher MAP FINDINGS HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000174949 Tepaid: CAL000082530 Contact: DR t B SACKS DDS Telephone: (650) 583-9300 Gen County: San Francisco Tsd County: Santa Clara Tons: 0.0166 Category: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Disposal Method: Treatment, Tank Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 1058 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 -5402 County San Francisco C31 ROBERT J GOLDEN DDS HAZNET S103645088 South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD N/A 1/8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher HAZN ET: Gepaid: CAL922984725 Tepaid: CAD982321879 Contact: ROBERT J GOLDEN DDS INC Telephone: (415) 873-5212 Gen County: San Mateo ~ Tsd County: Stanislaus Tons: 0.0625 Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 -5402 County San Mateo C32 RAYMOND J. SHERIDAN, D.D.S. South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher HAZNET S103645091 NIA TC476544.1s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (tt.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA fD Number RAYMOND J. SHERIDAN, D.D.S. (Continued) S103645091 HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000124130 Tepaid: CAL000121946 Contact: RAYMOND J. SHERIDAN, D.D.S. Telephone: (650) 876-0866 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Marin Tons: 0.0417 Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 107 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo C33 RICHARD C ROBERT DDS MS HAZNET S103984298 South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD N/A 1I8-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000114948 Tepaid: CAD982321879 Contact: RICHARD C ROBERT D D S MS Telephone: (415) 582-2282 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Stanislaus Tons: 0.0624 Category: Photochemicalslphotoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 211 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 -5402 County San Mateo C34 STALIN CHU DDS HAZNET 5103989159 South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD N/A 118-1l4 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9408D 1279 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000117458 Tepaid: CAD070148432 Contact: STALIN CHU DDS Telephone: (415) 737-7907 Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: 1 Tons: 0.0667 Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Not reported Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 105A SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo C35 A.C. ABORDO DENTAL CORP. South 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD 118-114 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1279 Higher -` MAP.,FINDINGS HAZNET S1039d8361 N/A TC476544.1s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ,MAP FINDINGS A.C. ABORDO DENTAL CORP. (Continued) HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000125142 Tepaid: Contact: ARTHUR ABORDO, D.D.S. Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.0000 Category: Disposal Method: Treatment, Tank Mailing Address: 2400 WESTBOROUGH BLVD STE 203 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo B36 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE #540 North 2245 GELLERT 114-112 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1335 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI B37 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE #540 North 2245 GELLERT 114-1/2 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1335 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI EDR 10 Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S103948361 CAL000082530 (000) 000-0000 Santa Clara Program Number. 2220 Program Number: 2161 38 DRY CLEAN WAY North 2223 GELLERT 1/4-1/2 S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 1648 Nigher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI ' Program Number: 2220 Program Number. 2161 Ca. BI 5103893267 N/A Ca. BI 5103893266 NIA Ca. BI S102269369 N/A F39 RAVANERA DENTAL OFFICE North 2085 GELLERT BLVD 1/4-1/2 DALY CITY, CA 94015 1904 Higher HAZNET: Gepaid: CAL000123988 Contact: RUDY RAVANERA, D.D.S. Gen County: San Mateo Tons: 0.0208 Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method : Not reported Mailing Address: 2085 GELLERT BLVD STE 9 DALY CITY, CA 94015 - 2883 County San Mateo HAZNET S102821893 N/A Tepaid:. Not reported Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Tsd County: 0 TC476544.1s Page 21 Map ID MAP FINDINGS ,. <°- - -~ Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevatiort Site - F40 PG&E SERRAMONTE SUBSTATION North KING / GELLERT 114112 DALY CRY, CA 94015 1965 Higher SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI 41 BEKINS MOVING 8 STORAGE North 99 HYDE CT. 1141!2 DALY CITY, CA 94015 2370 Lower State UST: Facility ID: 63604 Tank Num: 1 Tank Capacity: 3500 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: PREMIUM Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: JOE GRIEGO Total Tanks: 1 Facility Type: 2 Program Number. 2165 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Ca. BI S102267872 N/A UST 0001594022 NIA Container Num: 056-005 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Constrctn: Not reported Telephone: (415) 878-0880 Region: Not reported Other Type: MOVING & STORAGE TC476544.1s Page 22 Map ID MAP FINDINGS . -, o _ _ . , . - Direction __ _ , _ , ., Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number G42 UNOCAL LUST S100234179 WNW 3964 CALLAN BLVD Cortese NIA 1/2-1 SOUTH SAN FRANCI SCO, CA 4685 Higher - State LUST: Cross SVeet: Not reported Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Misc. Motor Vehicle Fuels Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Other ground water affected Status: Not reported Abate Method: Replace Supply -provide altemative water supply to affected parties, Replace Supply -provide altemative water supply to affected parties Review Date: 11!03/1999 Confirm Leak: Not reported Workpian: 5!31/1996 Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: 4!9/1998 Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Release Date: 11!03/1987 LUST Region 2: Region: File Number: Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater: CORTESE: Reg By: LTNItA Reg Id: 41-0611 Region: CORTESE 2 41-0611 1!25!89 Pollution characterization 7800 2500 ND 64 64 G43 DRS TIRE 8 AUTO CARE WNW 1010 KING DR 1/2-1 DALY CITY, CA 94015 4859 Higher tiAZN ET: Gepaid: CAL000029202 Tepaid: Contact: DRS TIRE & AUTO CARE Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.2500 Category: Other empty containers 30 gallons or more Disposal Method: Recycier Mailing Address: 1010 KING OR DALY CITY, CA 94015 - 4440 County San Mateo CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0936 Region: CORTESE HAZNET Cortese CAD009466392 (000) 000-0000 7 5102424366 N/A TC476544.1s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 44 SW ~n-1 4864 Higher 45 ENE >1 5406 Lower SHELL 3999 SKYLINE BLVD SAN BRUNO, CA State LUST: Cross Street: Reg Board: Chemical: Lead Agency: Case Type: Status: Abate Method: Review Date: Workplan: Pollution Char. Remed Action: Close Date: -_-: MAP FINDINGS Not reported San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Gasoline Local Agency Other ground water affected Not reported No Action Taken - no action has as yet been taken at the site 05/13/1999 Confirm Leak: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Release Date: LUST Region 2: Region: File Number. Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater: LUST San Mateo County: 2 41-0502 1 /31 /89 Preliminary site assessment underway 1300 33000 66 48 48 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S100225469 Cortese NIA Not reported Not reported 10/15/1992 Not reported Not reported 09/03/1985 Facility ID: EE0003185 Region: SAN MATED Local ID: 88001 Z ~ Case Type: Other ground water affected Initial Date: 1/31/89 Closed Date: Not reported Facility Status: Determine site status and notify SWRCB Lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0502 Region: CORTESE CALIFORNIA GOLF CLUB 844 W ORANGE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA LUST S104161799 HAZNET N/A Cortese State LUST: Cross Street: Not reported Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Regular Gasoline Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Soil only Status: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Treat -remove contaminated soil and Veat (includes spreading or land farming) Review Date: 01/10/1995 Confirm Leak: 2/1/1996 Workplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Release Date: 04/22/1986 TC476544.1s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site _. , MAP FINDINGS `- __ -..: CALIFORNIA GOLF CLUB (Continued) LUST Region 2: Region: File Number. Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater: LUST San Mateo County: 2 41-0687 1/14/93 Preliminary site assessment workplan submitted 600 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Facility ID: EE0003175 Region: SAN MATED Local ID: 550111 Case Type: Soil only Initial Date: 1/14/93 Closed Date: Not reported Facility Status: Determine site status and notify SWRCB Lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County Facility ID: EE0003175 Region: SAN MATED Local ID: 550111 Case Type: Soil only Initial Date: 1/14/93 Closed Date: Not reported Facility Status: Post Remedial Action Monitoring Lead Agency: Local Lead, San Mateo County HAZNET; Gepaid: CA0001228176 Tepaid: CAL000027741 Contact: CALIFORNIA_GOLF CLUB Telephone: (415) 588-9021 Gen County: San Mateo ~ Tsd County: 5 Tons: 0.6321 Category: Asbestos-containing waste Disposal Method: Disposal, Land Fill Mailing Address: 844 W ORANGE ST SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0687 Region: CORTESE 46 SKYLINE COLLEGE RCRIS-SQG SSW 3300 COLLEGE DRIVE FINDS > 1 SAN BRUNO, CA 94066 UST 5541 , Ca. BI Higher LUST Cortese S104161799 1000285399 CAD982490138 TC476544.15 Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site " - MAP FINDINGS _ SKYLINE COLLEGE (Continued) RCRIS: Owner: SAN MATED COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE (415) 555-1212 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER , (415) 355-7000 Record Date: 05/25/1990 Classification: Small Quantity Generator Used Oil Recyc : No Violation Status : No violations found State LUST: Cross Street: Not reported Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Misc. Motor Vehicle Fuels Lead Agency: Local Agency Case Type: Soil only Status: Not reported Abate Method: No Action Taken - no action ha s as yet been taken at the site Review Date: 01/02/1998 Confirm Leak: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: 1/2/1998 Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Release Date: 08/29!1991 LUST Region 2: Region: Fite Number: ' Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater: CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0525 Region: CORTESE SAN MATED BI: Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI Region: 5AN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI Region: SAN MATED BI 2 41-0525 9/12/91 Pollution characterization 8600 Not reported Not reported Not reported Nat reported Program Number. 2161 Program Number: 2161 Program Number: 2201 Program Number: 2161 Program Number: 2201 Program Number: 2220 Program Number: 2220 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000285399 TC476544.1s Page 26 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site •`-MAP FINDINGS SKYLINE COLLEGE (Continued) State UST: Facility ID: 12141 Tank Num: 1 Container Num: 2 Tank Capacity: 12000 Year Installed: 1976 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Constrctn: 1/4" unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (415) 355-7000 Total Tanks: 4 Region: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: DIESEL FOR BOILER Facility ID: 12141 .Tank Num: 2 Container Num: 1 Tank Capacty: 7500 Year Installed: 1968 Tank Used for. PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Constrctn: 1/4" unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (415) 355-7000 Total Tanks: 4 Region: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: DIESEL FOR BOILER Facility ID: 12141 Tank Num: 3 Container Num: 4 Tank Capacity: 500 Year Installed: 1976 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Tank Constrctn: 1/4" unknown leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (415) 355-7000 Total Tanks: 4 Region: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: DIESEL FOR BOILER Facility ID: 12141 Tank Num: 4 Container Num: 3 Tank Capacity: 1000 Year Installed: 1975 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: REGULAR Tank Constrctn: 1/4" unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: (415) 355-7000 Total Tanks: 4 Region: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: DIESEL FOR BOILER 47 SUN STREAM HOMES East (NO STREET NBR) TAYLOR DR > 1 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 5637 Lower CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0550 Region: CORTESE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000285399 Cortese S100475343 NIA 48 PLATH NURSERY East 250 TAYLOR DR > 1 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 5996 Lower LUST S102430313 Cortese NIA TC476544.1s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (fL) Elevation Site `, MAP FINDINGS PLATH NURSERY (Continued) State LUST: Cross Street: Not reported Reg Board: San Francisco Bay Region Qty Leaked: Not reported Chemical: Misc. Motor Vehicle Fuels Lead Agency: Logl Agency Case Type: Soil only Status: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Treat -remove contaminated soil and treat (includes spreading or land farming) Review Date: 08/01/1996 Confirm Leak: 11/24/1989 Workptan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Release Date: 11/24/1989 LUST Region 2: Region: File Number: Entered Date: Facility Status: Maximum Soil Concentration: Maximum Groundwater Impact: Current Benzene in Groundwater: MTBE Contamination Level: Maximum MTBE Groundwater. CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0683 Region: CORTESE 49 ROD MCLELLAN COMPANY NNE 1450 EL CAMINO REAL > 1 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 6235 Lower 2 41-0683 1/21/93 Preliminary site assessment workplan submitted 3500 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported HAZNET: Gepaid: CA0000965176 Tepaid: Contact: ROD MCLELLAN CO Telephone: Gen County: San Mateo Tsd County: Tons: 0.0458 Category: Aqueous solution with 10% or more total organic residues Disposal Method: Recycler Mailing Address: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 County San Mateo CORTESE: Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 41-0972 Region: CORTESE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HAZNET Cortese CAD009452657 (000) 000-0000 San Mateo S102430313 0002080086 N/A TC476544.1s Page 28 ~ N N~ O !`07 p m 0 N N O V O 0 n O ^ O O~ 10 t00 N~ c7 N N p tD N ~{ O O O O O O O O p p O O O O p O O O J J J J J U O U JO OJ p li U U U U U U o U U U W „I m ^ a N Y 6 ~ o y ~ i m a y O m W Z N O ^ W U N M N O ~ O .p O ~ O ~ fY ,~ U o U v U v v a0 tp O ~ ~ 0 W O ~ ~ N A A N m O1 r _Y 001 p~ O O K 40 0g ~ 10D C OA ~ 0 0 0 U U Q Q~ O N N W~ J O U e v ~+ v v v v U U U U LL a LL ~ 3 y ~~~~~~ ~~~ LL~~ ~Z Z Z N Z Z F N Z Z U~ y Z~> y ffQf NZ~~~ tai. ' LL y f' f' F Z Z Z Z Z Z Z S Z Z O S Z Z J U U Z J~ U=~ (> ~ U J J J Z Z=$ V7 1A 4'/ 1[I to 10 Y7 N_ 1A 47 0 0 0 0 tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cO aD 0 fD m 0 [O a0 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a°irna`~ic~irnma°lrnrnrnmrnrno°~m ov vavv 1 W O Oa Ol 0/ 0~ C ~ ¢ a ~ m z w r y a > O a A ^ K ~ ~ N H N ^ ~ F W O ¢ F- H H F F° ~ !- > ~. O^° o X 0 0 y y y is Uc~Umc~,~, m zo jww= aaa^^^^ W W W W W ¢ O H > LL y 2 K>>>> ~~~~~~ ~ a¢ o ~¢~ o~ a a m m m m p^ O^^ p W N co ¢ jrj J Z W°, y=^ Z Z S Z Z Z > > > > > > ° w w w y -~ 3 a J ¢ ¢ ~ m ~ ag > > > > J J J J J J J O f- F LL m= O = m~ W 0 3 LL LL 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m a' y y LL F- ` Z Z (~ y F- ,~j ¢ Z Z~ 1 (L C H F 1- F H F- F W N N O Z LL~ U m 2¢¢ 0 0 0 0 w w w w w w m a a a ^ O W z 3 0 m w~ y y y m m m m J J J J J J W Z ~ a> m Y ^ O a Z Z Z F F F ~"' J J J J J J m~ U U ¢ ~ -~ O ~ W W W W ~~~~~~ c~ ¢ Y Y m a~ z° a o° m W z~ W o 0 0 3 3 3 3 `r a v v v o o n °m vOi ~ W Y~ '~ "~ ~ 1-f u~i S N ai Y X Y o o °o °O t7 t7 C7 f") C7 07 O N Q1 O= m 0 U N^ Z n W O1 W U~~~ N N N N J W W y p' C y ~ ~ g ¢ 7 > > ~ ~ O ~ ^ ^ ~ W ~ a a d ° ¢ ~ ~ O w U U W O LL ¢ ^ ~ ~ Z Z> F- O O O ¢ Z ~ O ^ O ~ ~ w ~ ~ H W U Z K a¢ O O a 0 ~ ^ m^ ¢ W ~ N ~~ u ai a U U O D U O Q O O O zo°^W oa ~a~wz0 x z~°U~'v~z>'<°aZ cQi a~~ a Z A ~~~ J~ z z w a LL~~ LL z a~ o w o Y~ LL a ~ O Z¢ QxQ ^° z o o • o z~ z~ a w~~ x ¢ Y J~ m Q Z O R O^ h~ W W W~ p Z '" N 3 h¢ Q}~~ N ~~ Q O S W¢ F- m Z Z~ t~A a K U Y m~>> W~ W W Z y a m X W J Z ^¢ Q~ ^ U^ W =~ fA ~ U O d S (/°j O y O O ~ O t~ t~ Vxj ~ j LL U LL~ p Om0 m n ~ O ~ H O $ ~ O N m !'1 ^ ^ Of 117 a0 O W ~ {0 t0 1~ Of A O 1. A e~ ~^~ m 0 .~ n O1 N h O 0 /7 ~~ c0 ^ N N 1t) N N N N h 'OV (O O O N 1D 0 0 N 0 N 0 0<Q V O N f07 10 0) Ot 001 W 00f N 1~0 Q1 00i A O~ A A O< O t0 V m 1A N~ M V t~0 n O V A t0 O R N 1~ l7 [7 to < O N N f0 O1 Of T 0 0 0 0 O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l7 C7 O N N !`7 ~ (y p Y 0 17 N) 1,.1 ~ C O O _O O O O O O O O O_ O _O O O O O O_ y y y y y y ~- y y m y° ~ y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U } y y to 1!1 y fn y y y y y y y 0 0 ~ ~ 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z ~_ ~ y a a a¢ a a¢ a a¢ a a¢ o z s x x m z~ z¢~ m¢ m } yy y}} yy yy U U U U LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL {~ LL 1- 1- ~ _F V- ~_ F _~ ~_ F p fY ~ ~ ? O (a ~ y N ~ ~ N y fa !¢ to y f¢ U U U U U U U U U U 2 LL LL Z~¢_______= Z=___ >>> ~r>>>>>OZ z m ~H~~-f-f-~~f-r~-f-F- f- J J J J J J J J J J Z < < ~ Z Z U ~~~~~~~~~~~~ <<¢<<<<<<<¢ y y ¢< o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °°^° D O°°^^ J y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y H O Ol a r °v m n a U F- ,_ _ r ;,. _.. - - . GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING --' To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone: N!A National Priorities list (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority Geanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC). Date of Government Version: 02/04/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/07/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 37 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/08/99 DELISTED NPL: NPL Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: N/A The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 11/08/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/07/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 37 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/08/99 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCl11). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities list (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 02/14/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/02!00 Elapsed ASTM days: 13 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/29/99 CERCLIS-NFRAP: No Further Remedial Action Planned Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Acton Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed Irom CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. Date of Government Version: 02/14/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/02/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 13 Oate of Last EDR Contact: 11/29!99 TC476544.1s Page Al _: ~, , . _ _ GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING" `: ~ -- o - _. . - _ . : __ _ __ CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Govemment Version: 09/07/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 10/28/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 09/13!99 Elapsed ASTM days: 45 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/13/99 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 ' Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Date of Govemment Version: 09/01/99 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/06/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/17/99 Elapsed ASTM days: 42 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/03/00 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: EPAMTIS Telephone: 202-260-2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Govemment Version: 01/06/00 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/31/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/08/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 8 Database Release Frequency: t]uarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/01/99 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) -and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/97 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/20/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCI.A) Consent Decrees Source: EPA Regional Offices Telephone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Govemment Version: Varies Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A ROD: Records Of Decision Source: NTIS Telephone: 703-416-0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04!10/00 TC476544.15 Page A2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index 5ystem/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and Vack information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection ConVol), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities. Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activii Data System). Date of Govemment Version: 10/13/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/12/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04!10/00 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4526 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spilt incidents reported to DOT. Date of Govemment Version: 06/30/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/28/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/00 MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Govemment Version: 10/29!99 Database Release Frequency: Ouarteriy MINES: Mines Master Index Fiie Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date of Government Version: 08(01/98 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/03/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/00 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 2 0 5-5 6412 6 7 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Oate of Govemment Version: 10/15/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/24/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/00 PADS: PC8 Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260.3936 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial scorers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Govemment Version: 09/22/97 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/09/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/00 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Govemment Version: 04/17/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 12113/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 TC476544.1s Page A3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED DATA CURRENCY TRACKING - : - _ .. _ . - ._ - - TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-1531 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies taciCties which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/97 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 1287/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/00 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-1444 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant Site. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/94 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/03/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0484/00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASTM STANDARD RECORDS CAL-SITES (AWP): Annual Workpfan Source: Califomia Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-3400 Known Hazardous Waste Sites. Califomia DTSC's Annual Workplan (AWP), formerly BEP, identifies known hazardous substance sites targeted for cleanup. Date of Govemment Version: 03/02/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 06/29/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06/01/99 Elapsed ASTM days: 28 Oate of Last EDR Contact: 01!31/00 CAL-SITES (ASPIS): Calsites Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 The Calsites database contains poteptial or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. Date of Government Version: 01/03/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/02/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/31/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 31 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/16/99 CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material incident Report System Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-464-3283 California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/94 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/24/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/13/95 Elapsed ASTM days: 42 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/30/99 CORTESE: Cortese Source: CAL EPA/0ffice of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-327-1848 The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWFILS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Govemment Version: 04/01/98 Date Made Active at EDR: 09/23/98 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 08/26/98 Elapsed ASTM days: 28 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/01/99 TC476544.1s Page A4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING - NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Source: State Water Resources ConVol Board Telephone: 916-657-0696 Proposition 65 Notification Records. NOTIFY 65 contains facility notifications about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. Date of Govemment Version: 10121/93 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/19/93 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/01/93 Elapsed ASTM days: 18 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/00 TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Source: State Water Resources ConUol Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/95 Date Made Active at EDR: 09!26195 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 08/30/95 Elapsed ASTM days: 27 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/07/00 SWF/LF (SW1S): Solid Waste Information System Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-255-4035 Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 uiteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 12/20/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/01/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/20/99 Elapsed ASTM days: 43 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/20/99 WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 10/01/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/23/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/26/99 Elapsed ASTM days: 28 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/22/00 LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-6532 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 01/03/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/07/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/10/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 28 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 CA UST: UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4408 The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to IocaUcounty source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/90 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/12/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/25/91 Elapsed ASTM days: 18 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/17/00 TC476544.1s Page A5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED J DATA CURRENCY TRACKING -' BEP: Bond Expenditure Plan Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Department of Health Services developed asite-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Govemment Version: 01/01/89 Date Made Active at EDR: 08/02!94 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 07/27/94 Elapsed ASTM days: 6 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/31/94 FlD: Facility Inventory Database Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-445-6532 The Facility (nventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to IocaUcounty source for current data. Date of Govemment Version: 10/31/94 Oate Made Active at EDR: 09/29/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4382 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Govemment Version: 12/10/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly WDS: Waste Discharge System Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-657-1571 Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Govemment Version: 10/29/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery listing Source: Regional Water Quality ConVol Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date of Government Version: 12/01/98 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 09/05195 Elapsed ASTM days: 24 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/28/98 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/07/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/07/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 HAZNET: Hazardous Waste Information System Source: Califomia Environmental-Protection Agency Telephone: 916-324-1781 Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manfests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/98 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/15/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/00 SMS R_2: South Bay Site Management System Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Groundwater pollution cases in the Santa Clara Valley where the regulatory lead is the San Francisco Bay Regional Water puality Control Board. Date of Government Version: 05/21/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A TC476544.1 s Page A6 ,. ,;- ,-.- `:. _>- . GOVERNMENT RECORDS. SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING _ ', _.. _ - . - r_ LOCAL RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Local Oversight Program Listing of UGT Cleanup Sites Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date of Govemment Version: 01/04/99 ' Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date of Govemment Version: 01/04/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/00 SL: Site List Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Govemment Version: 07/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/06/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/00 KERN COUNTY: UST: Sites 8 Tanks Listing Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Kem County Sites and Tanks Listing. Oate of Government Version: 12/08%99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/08/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/00 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Date of Govemment Version: 09/16/98 Database Release Frequency: Annually City of Los Angeles Landfllis Source: Engineering 8 Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Date of Government Version: 08/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually HMS: Street Number List Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Govemment Version: 06/30/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/02/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12J22/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/12/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10!00 TC476544.1s Page A7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site Mitigation List Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890.7806 Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Govemment Version: 0323/99 Date of Last EDR Contact 11/22/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/00 San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-744-2407 San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/98 Database Release Frequency: NIA MARIN COUNTY; UST Sttes Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Govemment Version: 03/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually NAPA COUNTY: LUST; Sites With Reported Contamination Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date of Govemment Version: 08/27/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date of Government Version: 08/30/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually ORANGE COUNTY: LUST: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Govemment Version: 12/02/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-344 6 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Govemment Version: 11/29/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 06/29/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/23/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: OS/08/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/20/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/20!99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/13/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13!00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/13!99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 TC476544.1s Page A8 -e.. _ - ~.:. GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /.DATACURRENCY TRACKING . L(st of Industrial Site Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714834-3446 Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Govemment Version: 01/19/99 Date of Last EDR Contact 01/03/00 Database Release Frequency. Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 PLACER COUNTY: MS: Master List of Facilities Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-889-7335 List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and deanup sites. Date of Govemment Version: 01/20/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 909-358-5055 Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/04/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: Tank Ltst Source: Health Services Agency Telephone: 909-358-5055 Date of Govemment Version: 10/04/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxlsite list Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8450 Date of Govemment Version: 12/01/98 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/27/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/27/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/08/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/00 ML: Regulatory Compliance Master List Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8450 Any business that has hazardous materials on site -hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Govemment Version: 04/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/08/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/00 TC476544.is Page A9 _ ,, ~._ ~ GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY_TRACKING DEHS Permit System Print-Out By Locatton Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Govemment Version: 02/01/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/13/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 SAN DIEGO COUNTY: SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facilities Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/98 Database Release Frequency. Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12!03/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28!00 HMMD: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 The database includes: HE58 -This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - in addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, VeatmenUdisposai of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 01/02/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10!00 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: LUST: Local Oversite Facilities Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date of Govemment Version: 12/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date of Govemment Version: 12/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/27/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/15/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 SAN JOSE COUNTY: Nazmat Facilities Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-277-4659 Date of Govemment Version: 08/24/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/22/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/00 TC476544.ts PageA10 . ::, t_ ;` -- z-, GOVERNMENT.. RECORDS SEARCHED /,.DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SAN MATED COUNTY: LUST: Fuel Leak List Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date of Govemment Version: 12/02/99 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Nezt Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01!00 Business Inventory Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 List includes Hazardous Materials Business Pian, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Govemment Version: 06/24/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CLARA COUNTY: LUST: Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-927-0710 Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SOLANO COUNTY: LUST: Leaking Undergroung Storage Tanks Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-421-6770 Date of Govemment Version: 12/22/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: Underground Storage Tanks Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-421-6770 Date of Govemment Version: 12/22/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: LUST Sites Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-525-6565 Date of Govemment Version: 11/01/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly BUTTER COUNTY: UST: Underground Storage Tanks Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-741-7504 Date of Government Version: 08/02/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR ContacL• 01/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 04/17/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/26/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03!00 Date of Last EDR ContacL• 12/22/99 Date of Next Scheduled FOR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01131/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 TC476544.15 Page A11 .,.,:_ _. - - , ~ . _ - _ _ ` GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/_DATA CURRENCY TRACKfNG _ - VENTURA COUNTY: SWF/LF: Inventory of Uiegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Govemment Version: 06/01/97 Database Release Frequency: Annually LUST: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 12/06/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/29/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 1220/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 UST: Underground Tank Closed Sites Llst Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List Date of Govemment Version: 10/21/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/17/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/00 BWT: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 12/06/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Source: Yoio County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Date of Government Version: 07/15/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 1220/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/00 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) LUST Records LUST REG 1: Active Tozic Site Investigation Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date of Govemment Version: 08/06/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR ContacL• 11/30/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/00 LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Date of Govemment Version: 01/11/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/27/00 Date of Nexi Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/00 TC476544.1s Page A12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED % DATA CURRENCY TRACKING - :. ~ , _ , LUST REG 3: LUSTIS Database Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board CenVal Coast Region (3) Telephone: 605-549-3147 Date of Govemment Version: 11/24/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Source: Califomia Regional Water t]ualiry Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-266-6600 Date of Govemment Version: 08/24/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-255-3125 Date of Govemment Version: 02/01/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 916-542-5424 Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 02/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/16/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01!10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office {6) Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date of Govemment Version: 01/25/00 Database Release Frequency: Duarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LUST REG 8: (LUSTIS) Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (6) Telephone: 909-782-4498 Date of Govemment Version: 10/22/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually , LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Source: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 619-467-2952 Date of Government Version: 10/22/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/03/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/03/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/14/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24!00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/00 TC476544.1s Page A13 ,_ , . _ .GOVERNMENT RECORDS_SEARCHED /.DATA CURRENCY TRACKING - , :_ California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) SLIC Records SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations Source: Calitomia Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date of Govemment Version: 08/06/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 11130/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/00 SLIC REG 2: North and South Bay Slic Report Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Govemment Version: 12/14!99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/00 SLIC REG 3: SLIC Data Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Govemment Version: 11/24/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/00 SLIC REG 4: SLIC Sites Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Govemment Version: 10/25/99 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/08/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/00 SLIC REG 5: SLIC List Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-8 55-3075 Unregulated sites that impact groundwater or have the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Govemment Version: 09/30/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, V'ictorvilte Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date of Govemment Version: 12/01/98 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 8: SLIC List Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-T82-3298 Date of Government Version: 07/27/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: WDS NURD List Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Oiego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date of Govemment Version: 03/12/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10!00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04!10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/11/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/07/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/00 TC476544.1s Page A14 ~. _, - , ,, ,. - GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. OCopyright 1993 Reai Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative. Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc. The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report, Reai Property Scan does not guarantee the axuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid. No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion. HISTORICAL AND OTHER DATABASES Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are Included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in March 1997 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC476544.1s Page A15 ®; Environmental :Data ;Resources, Inc. an.~edr-cvmpany "Linking Technology with Tradition" SanbornT'" Map Report Ship to: Dennis Laduzinsky Order Date: 3/22/2000 Completion Date: 03/30/2000 Renshaw Associates Inquiry #: 476544.25 11875 Dublin Blvd P.O. #: NA Dublin, CA 94568 Site Name: Gellert Address: Gellert Blvd/Westborough Blvd City/State: South San Francisco, CA 94080 1024663PEK 925-551-7272 Cross Streets: This document reports that the largest and most complete collection of Sanborn fire insurance maps has been reviewed based on client-supplied information, and fire insurance maps depicting the target property at the specified address were not identified. NO COVERAGE All maps provided pursuant to a SanbornTM Map Repoli are currently reproducible of fire insurance maps owned or licensed by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISClA1MS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES AS TO ACCURACY, VALIDITY, COMPLETENESS, SUITABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE REPORT, THE MAPS, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN, OR THE RESULTS OF A SEARCH OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. assumes no liability to any party for any Toss or damage whether arising out of errors or omissions, negligence, accident or any other cause. In no event shall Environmental Data Resources, Inc., ils affiliates or agents, be liable to anyone for special, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages. Copyright 2000, Environmental Data Resources, Ine. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format of any map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (whether obtained as a result of a search or otherwise) may be prohibited without prior written permission from Environmental Data Resources, Inc Sanborn and Sanborn Map are Vademarks of EDR Sanbom, Inc. HA ., APPENDIX B~ Laboratory- Analytical Results .-~ P/iase I Preliminary Site Assessment June 9, 2000 South San Francisco, California G: lFilesL~681 i 91 ~-00. upd Columbia Analytical Services ~N~. An Employee-Owned Company May 9, 2000 Mr. Dennis Laduzinsky HENSHAW ASSOCIATES, INC. 11875 Dublin Blvd. Ste. A200 Dublin, CA 94568 RE: Dear Mr. Laduzinsky: Gellert B1vd.1268.A.01 Service Request No.: S2001344 Enclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory on April 26, 2000. All analyses were performed in accordance with our laboratory's quality assurance program. Results are intended to be considered in their entirety and apply to the sample(s) analyzed. Columbia Analytical Services is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Signature of this CAS Analytical Report confirms that pages 2 through 30, following, have been thoroughly reviewed and approved for release. Columbia Analytical Services is certified for environmental analyses by the California Department of Health Services (certificate number: 2352, expiration: January 31, 2001). If you have any questions, please call me at (408) 748-9700. Respectfully submitted, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. • ~ ~ ~~ . ,. Bernadette Troncales Project Chemist ~~~~.~ _ - _~~~ r . .nn ~ ~. • n 111 L (1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: HENSHAW ASSOCIATES, INC. Service Request: 52001344 Project: Gellert BIvdJ268.A.01 NARRATIVE All analyses were performed in accordance with.ow laboratory's quality asswance program. This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier II data deliverables. When appropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Surrogate recoveries have been reported for all applicable organic analyses. Additional quality control analyses reported herein include: Matrix Spike (MS) and Duplicate Matrix Spike (DMS). All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group. No difficulties were experienced during analysis of this batch. Page 2 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, Inc. , Acronyms A2LA American Association for Laboratory Accreditation ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes CAM California Assessment Metals CARB Cal'~fomia Air Resources Board CAS Number Chemical Abstract Service registry Number CFC Chlorofluorocarbon CFU Colony-Forming Unit COD Chemical Oxygen Demand DEC Department of Environmental Conservation DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DHS Department of Health Services DLCS Duplicate Laboratory Control Sample DMS Duplicate Matrix Spike DOE Department of Ecology DOH Department of Health EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program GC Gas Chromatography GClMS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry IC Ion Chromatography ICB Initial Calibration Blank sample ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma atomic emission spectrometry ICV Initial Calibration Verification sample ,! Estimated concentration. The value is less than the MRL, but greater than or equal to the MDL. If the value is equal to the MRL, the result is actually <MRL before rounding. LCS Laborat -y Control Sample LOFT Leaking Jnderground Fuel Tank I~/I Modified MBAS Methylene Blue Active Substances MCL Maximum Contaminant Level. The highest permissible concentration of a substance allowed in drinking water as established by the U. S. EPA. MDL Method Detection Limit ' MPN Most Probable Number MRL Method Reporting Limit MS Matrix Spike MTBE Methyl tent-Butyl Ether NA Not Applicable NAN Not Analyzed NC Not Calculated NCASI National Council of the paper industry for Air and Stream Improvement ND Not Detected at or above the method reportingldetection limit (MRUMDL) NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units ppb Parts Per Billion ppm Parts Per Million PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QA/QC (.'uality Assurance/Quality Control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RPD Relative Percent Difference SIM Selected Ion Monitoring SM Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed., 1992 STLC Solubility Threshold Limit Concentration SW Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, 3rd Ed., 1986 and as amended by Updates I, II, IIA, and IIB. TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure TDS Total Dissolved Solids TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons tr Trace level. The concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or equal to the MDL. If the value is equal to the PQL, the result is actually <PQL before rounding. 7RPH Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons TSS Total Suspended Solids TTLC Total Threshold Limit Concentration VOA Volatile Organic Analyte(s) ACRONLST.DOC 7114/95 Page 3 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert B1vd.268.A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil TPH as Diesel Prep Method: LUFT Analysis Method: California DHS LLTFT Test Notes: Sample Name GS-1 Comp. GSA Comp. Method Blank D2 Approved By: IA/0?0397p Lab Code S2001344-007 S2001344-008 S200427-SB 1 Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: 424/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Dilution Date Date Result MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes 1 1 arz7/oo 4rza/oo rrD 1 1 4/27/00 4/28/00 15 D2 1 1 4/27/00 4/27/00 ND The sample contains a higher boiling point hydrocarbon mixture quantitated as diesel. The chromatogram does not match the typical diesel fingerprint. ~1 Date: D ~~~~ l!~ Page 4 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil Surrogate Recovery Summary TPH as Diesel Prep Method: LUFT Analysis Method: California DHS LUFT Sample Name Lab Code QA/QC Report Test Notes Service Request: S20013.34 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: NA Units: PERCEN'T' Basis: NA Percent Recovery p-Terphenyl GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007 60 GS-4 Comp. 52001344-008 53 GS-1 Comp. S2001344-7MS 92 GS-1 Comp. S2001344-7DMS 67 Method Blank S200427-SB1 103 CAS Acceptance Limits: Approved By: Sl1Ai/020597p .i Page ~ 41-140 Date: ~ J `~~/ ~~ COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert BIvdJ268A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary TPH as Diesel Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Date Extracted: 4/27/00 Date Analyzed: 4128/00 Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Sample Name: GS-1 Comp. Lab Code: S2001344-7MS, S2001344-7DMS Basis: Wet Test Notes: Percent Recovery CAS Relative Prep Analysis Spike Level Sample Spike Result Acceptance Percent Result Analyte Method Method MRL MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes TPH as Diesel LUFf California DHS LUFI' 1 100 100 ND 91 70 91 70 28-157 26 ~~U ~C~ Approved By: Date: D\(S/020S91p COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 Soil BTEX and TPH as Gasoline Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte TPH as Gasoline Benzene Toluene Eth}•lbenzene Xy]encs, Total GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007 Ututs: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result EPA 5030 CA/LUFT 1 I 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1100 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/l/00 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021E 0.010 I 4!28/00 5/1/00 ND Approved By: / Date: ~~~~'~ ~~~ tszvozo39~p Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Result Notes T- _. '1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert Blvd1268A01 Soil BTEX and TPH as Gasoline Sample Name Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte TPH as Gasoline Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes, Tots] GS-4 Comp. S2001344-008 Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Datc Date Method Method iVIRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result EPA 5030 CA/LUFf 1 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021E 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1100 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.00 1 4/28,'00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021E 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.010 1 4/28/00 S/1/00 ND ~'~ ... Approved By: ~v 1 Date: ~ y iszvozos9~P Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Result Notes COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert BIvdJ268.A.01 Soil BTEX and TPH as Gasoline Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte TPH as Gasoline Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes, Tota! Method Blank 5200428-S B I Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result EPA 5030 CA/I-UFT 1 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 1 4!28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021E 0.005 1 4/28/00 5/1/00 ND EPA 5030 8021E 0.010 1 4!28/00 5/1/00 ND Approved By: Date: ~ ~l ~ IS21/020597p Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Result Notes COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert Blvd./268.A01 Sample Matrix: Soil Surrogate Recovery Summary BTEX and TPH as Gasoline Prep Method: EPA 5030 Analysis Method: 8021B CA/LUFT Sample Name Lab Code Units: PERCENT Basis: NA Test Percent Recovery Notes a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007 102 98 GSA Comp. 52001344-008 104 94 BATCH QC 52001346-0OlOMS 88 93 BATCH QC S2001346-001 ODMS 89 93 Lab Control Sample S200428-LCS 89 95 Method Blank S200428-SB 1 106 106 CAS Acceptance Limits: Approved By-: $IJR?/020J97p 70-130 Date: C ~~ ~ ~~ Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: NA 70-130 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: 52001344 Project: Gellert BIvdJ268A.01 Date Collected: NA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: NA Date Extracted: 4!28/00 Date Analyzed: 5/1/00 Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary BTEX and TPH as Gasoline Sample Name: BATCH QC Units: mg/ICg (ppm) Lab Code: S2001346-001 OMS, 52001346-OOIODMS Basis: Wet Test Notes: Percent Recovery CAS Relative Prep Analysis Spike Level Sample Spike Result Acceptance Percent Result Analyte Method Method MRL MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes Benzene EPA 5030 8021E 0.005 0.5 0.5 ND 0.56 0.56 112 112 57-154 <1 Toluene EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 0.5 0.5 ND 0.61 0.63 122 126 60-142 3 Ethylbenzene EPA 5030 8021B 0.005 0.5 0.5 ND 0.59 0.60 118 120 46-150 2 Gasoline EPA 5030 CA/LUFT 1 10 10 ND 8.2 8.4 82 84 67-121 2 A roved B L~ Date: D~~t ~~~ PP Y Duyozosv~p D....e 1 1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SEBVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Ser~~ce Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Date Collected: NA LCS Matris• • Soil Date Received: NA Date Extracted: 4/28/00 Date Analyzed: S/1/00 Laboratory Control Sample Summary BTEX and TPH as Gasoline ' Sample Name: Lab Control Sample Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Lab Code: S200428-LCS Basis: Wet Test Notes: CAS Percent Recovery Prep Analysis True Percent Acceptance Result Analyte Method Method Value Result Recovery Limits Notes Benzene EPA 5030 8021B 0.5 0.56 112 57-154 Toluene EPA 5030 8021E 0.5 0.62 124 60-142 Ethvlbenzene EPA 5030 8021B 0.5 0.58 116 46-150 Gasoline EPA 5030 CA/LUFT 10 8.5 85 67-121 ~' C Sic<l ~ Approved By: V~ Date: LCS 9?0397p A90P 17 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert Blvd.l268.A.OI Soil Priority Pollutant Metals Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007 Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Method Method iV1RL Factor Prepared Analyzed Result Notes EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 31 EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 43 EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 5 EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 I 4/26/00 5/4/00 ]0 EPA 3050BM 7470 0.4 1 5/4/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 36 EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4126/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 27 Approved By: Date: isxvozas9~P Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 4!24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SE~tVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matriz: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Soil Priority Pollutant Metals Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Coppcr Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc GSA Comp. 52001344-008 Units: mg1Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Method Method iVIRL Factor Prepared Analyzed Result Notes EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 426/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 426/00 5/4/00 31 EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 426/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 426/00 5/4/00 46 EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 426/00 S/4/00 5 EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 426/00 5/4/00 13 EPA 3050BM 7470 0.4 1 5/4/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 30~OBM 6010A 2 1 4'26/00 5/4/00 37 EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 426/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 426/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND EPA 30~OBM 6010A 2 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 32 Approved By: ~ Date: 1523/020597p Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 424/00 Date Received: 426/00 Party td COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Soil Priority Pollutant Metals Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Method Blank s2001344-MB Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Method Method A4RL Factor Prepared Analyzed Result Notes EPA 30~OBM 6010A 5 1 4!26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 30~OBM 6010A 5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 4/26/00 5/4100 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 7470 0.4 1 5/4/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26/00 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 1 4/26100 5/4/00 ND A roved By: ~ V 1 Date: ~ J ~. ~G1 ~ ~ PP ~szvozos9~p PROP. 15 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERyICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert BIvdJ268.A.01 Date Collected: NA Sample Matris: Soil Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 426!00 Date Analyzed: 5/4/00 Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary Total Metals ' Sample Name: G5-1 Comp. Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Lab Code: S2001344-007MS, S2001344-007D MS Basis: Wet Test Notes: Perc ent Recovery CAS Relative Prep Analysis Spike Level Sample Spike Result Acceptance Percent Result Analyte btethod Method MRL MS DMS Result MS DIvIS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes Antimony EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 100 100 ND 37 40 37 40 75-125 8 X Arsenic EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 100 100 31 120 120 89 89 75-125 <1 Beryllium EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 20 20 ND 21 20 105 100 75-125 5 Cadmium EPA 3050BM 6010A 0.5 20 20 ND 19 19 95 95 75-125 <i Chromium EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 20 20 43 57 58 70 75 75-125 2 Copper EPA 3050BM 6010A 1 20 20 5 25 24 100 95 75-125 4 Lead EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 100 100 ]0 110 110 100 100 75-125 <1 Mercury EPA 3050BM 7470 0.4 2.5 2.5 ND 2.7 2.7 108 108 75-125 <1 Nickel EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 20 20 36 53 53 85 35 75-125 <1 Selenium EPA 3050BM 6010A 5 100 100 ND 99 98 99 98 75-125 1 Silver EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 20 20 ND l9 19 95 95 75-125 <1 Thallium EPA 3050BhI , 6010A 5 100 100 ND 40 32 40 32 75-125 22 X Zinc EPA 3050BM 6010A 2 20 20 27 46 47 95 100 75-125 2 )(; The MS and MSD recovery were outside the normal control limits, which was probably due to a method defect in the EPA 3050B digestion procedure. No further corrective action was taken. ~/ Date: U ~ G~ ~ ~ - Approved By: DMS/020597p Page 16 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 LCS Matrix: Soil Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 4/26/00 Date Analyzed: 5/4/00 Laboratory Control Sample Summary Total Metals Sample Name: Lab Control Sample Lab Code: 52001344-LCS Test Notes: CAS Percent Recovery Prep Analysis True Percent Acceptance Analyte Method Method Value Result Recovery Limits Antimony EPA 3050BM 6010A 100 94 94 75-125 Arsenic EPA 3050BM 6010A 100 95 95 75-125 Beryllium EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 20 100 75-125 Cadmium EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 20 100 75-125 Chromium EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 21 105 75-125 Copper EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 20 100 75-]25 Lead EPA 3050BM 6010A 100 98 98 75-125 Mercury EPA 3050BM 7470 2.5 2.7 108 75-125 Nickel EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 20 100 75-125 Selenium EPA 3050BM 6010A 100 99 99 75-125 Silver EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 19 95 75-125 Thallium EPA 3050BM 6010A ~ 100 90 90 75-125 Zinc EPA 3050BM 6010A 20 ]9 95 75-125 Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet ~' ~~ ~ r 1 ~ Approved By: Date: LCS/020597p Result Notes Page 17 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344• Project: Gcllert Blvd./268.A.01 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Sample Matrix: Soil Datc Received: 4/26/00 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Name: GS-1 Comp. Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Lab Code: S2001344-007 Basis: Wet Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result .Notes Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC 12) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23/00 5/2/00 ND Chloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Vinyl Chloride EPA S030A 8260 5 1 428/00 5/2/00 ND Bromomethane EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Chloroethane EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 1 I) EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Acrolein EPA 5030A 8260 SO 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Acetone EPA S030A 8260 200 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Iodomethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Carbon Disulfide EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Methylene Chloride EPA 5030A 8260 50 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND trans-l,2-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4128/00 5/2/00 ND 2-Butanone (Iv1EK) EPA 5030A 8260 10 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 5030.4 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Chloroform EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ~ND Bromochloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1-Dichloropropene EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 8!2/00 ND Carbon Tetrachloride EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Benzene EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/23/00 S/Z/00 ND Trichloroethene (TCE) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 S I 4/28!00 S/2/00 ND Bromodichloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Dibromomethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23/00 5/2/00 ND 2-Hexanone EPA 5030A 8260 10 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND cis-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA S030A 8260 5 I 4/28!00 5/2/00 ND Toluene EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND trans-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 ~ 5 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) EPA 5030A 8260 10 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND A Approved $y: v i Date: U C~ ~~ COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert BIvdJ268.A.01 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Sample Matrix• Soil Date Received: 4/26/00 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Name: GS-1 Comp. Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Lab Code: 52001344-007 Basis: Wet Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method M12L Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28!00 5/2100 ND Tetrachlorocthene (PCE) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Dibromochloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28:'00 5/2/00 ND Chlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Ethylbcnzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28100 5/2/00 ND ' Total Xylenes EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 D 1r Styrene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23'00 5/2/00 ND Bromoform EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Isopropylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 512/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2100 ND Bromobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2100 ND n-Propylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzerie EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28!00 5/2/00 ND tert-Butylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/23100 5/2/00 1`'D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND sec-Butylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28100 5/2100 ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4123/00 5/2100 IT'D 4-Isopropyltoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 8/2/00 ND n-Butylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4128/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/23/00 5/2/00 ND Naphthalene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5!2/00 ND Hexachiorobutadiene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28:'00 512/00 ND Approved By: V/ Date: ~ ~ l 1 IS?P/020597p COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert Blvd./268.A.Ol Date Collected: 4/24/00 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 4/26/00 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compou nds Sample Name: GS-4 Comp. Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Lab Code: S2001344-008 Basis: Wet Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method ivlethod MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC 12) EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Chloromcthane EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Vinyl Chloride EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4!28/00 5/2/00 ND Bromomethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND Chloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11) EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2'00 1`'D Acrolein EPA S030A 8260 50 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Acetone EPA S030A 8260 200 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/200 ND lodomethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 ] 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Carbon Disulfide EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND Methylene Chloride EPA 5030A 8260 50 1 4;28100 5/2/00 ND trans-l,2-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28100 5/2/00 N'D l,l-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 2-Butanone (MEK) EPA 5030A 8260 ]0 1 4/28/00 5/2'00 ND 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 S I 4!28/00 5/2/00 ND Chloroform EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2'00 ND Bromochloromethane EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2:00 ND 1,1-Dichloropropene EPA S030A 5260 5 l 4/28/00 5/2'00 ND Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28100 5/2'00 ND 1,2-Dichloroethene EP.4 S030A 8260 S 1 4!28/00 5/2/00 ND Benzene EPA S030A 8260 5 1 4128100 5/2/00 ND Trichloroethene (TCE) EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 S/2/00 ND 1,2-Dichloropropene EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Bromodichloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Dibromomethane EPA 5030A 3260 5 1 4/28100 5/2100 ND 2-Hexanone EPA 5030A 8260 10 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA S030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/2100 N'D Toluene EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 'EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28%00 S/2/00 ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23'00 5!2/00 ND 4-:Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) EPA 5030A 3260 10 1 4.!28.'00 5/2.00 ND ~~~ Date: G~L,~ ~~ Approved By: COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report nt: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344• iect• GellertBlvdJ268.A.01 Date C ollected: 4/24/00 ale Matrix: Soil Date Received: 4/26/00 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compou nds le Name: GS-4 Comp. Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Code: S2001344-008 Basis: Wet t Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result ityte Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes -'~rodifluoromethane (CFC 12) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND methane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Chloride EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4!28/00 5/2/00 ND momethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4128/00 5/2/00 ND ~roethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 5 1 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 5/2/00 5/2/00 ND ND orofluoromethane (CFC 11) EPA 5030A 8260 0 50 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND ein EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 826 8260 200 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND tone Dichloroethene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/200 ND zethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND ~n Disulfide EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 1 ND 'D I _,~ylene Chloride EPA 5030A 8260 50 1 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 00 5/2 5/2/00 v ND s-1,2-Dichloroethene ^ EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 8260 8260 5 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND ichloroethane anone (MEK) EPA 5030A 8260 10 1 4/28/00 5/2100 ND _~ichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 I 4/28/00 4/28/00 5/2/00 5/2/00 ND ND 1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 8260 8260 5 5 1 4/28/00 5/2'00 ND ~.roform ochloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4128/00 512/00 ND •Trichloroethane (TCA) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/200 ' ND ND Dichloropropene EPA 5030A 5260 5 1 1 4/28!00 4/28/00 00 5/2 5/2'00 ND bon Tetrachloride EPA 5030A 8260 5 5 1 4!28/00 5/2/00 ND ~ichloroethane EPA 5030A ~ 8260 5 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND • ene ;nloroethene (TCE) EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 8260 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND -Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 5/2/00 5/2/00 ND ND ~odichloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 5 1 4/28100 5/2100 ND ~momethane EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 8260 8260 10 1 4,'28100 5/2/00 ND . _xanone 3-Dichloro ro ene 1 p p EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2100 ND , ~~ EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND ene 3-Dichloropropene -1 EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23100 5/2/00 ND , -Trichloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 ~ 5 1 4/23/00 ' 5/2/00 ' ND ND .!ethyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) EPA 5030A 3260 10 1 28.00 4. 00 5/2 ~ ~~ ~~ -roved By: ~~ Date: COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Hrnshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert B1vd1268.A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Name: GS-4 Comp. Lab Code: 52001344-008 Test Notes: Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Analyte Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result 1,3-Dichloropropane EP.4 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 5030A 8260 S 1 4/28/00 5/Z/00 ND Dibromochloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 5030A 8260 20 ] 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Chlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Ethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Total Xylenes EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Styrene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 SCL00 ND Bromoform EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Isopropylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Bromobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND n-Propylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 ] 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND tert-Burylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND sec-Butylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 4-Isopropyltoluene EPA' S030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND n-Butylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28!00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 5/2.00 ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4128%00 5/2/00 ND Naphthalene EPA 5030A 5260 20 1 4/28100 5/2/00 ND Hexachlorobutadiene EPA 5030A 8260 20 l 4/28/00 5/2/00 ND Approved By: 1S.P~0_0597p Date: ~ J 1 ~.~~1 ~~~ Result Notes P',iOP 71 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC 12) Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC 11) Acrolein Acetone 1,1-Dichloroethene Iodomethane Carbon Disulfide Methylene Chloride trans- l ,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2-$utanone (MEK) 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dick loroethe ne Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) 1,1-Dichloropropene Carbon Tetrachloride 1,2-Dichloroethane Benzene Trichloroethene (TCE) 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane 2-He:eanone cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Toluene trans- l ,3-Dichloropropene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Renshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Soil Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Method Blank 5200428-SB 1 Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA S030A EPA S030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA S030A EPA 5030A EPA S030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030.4 EPA 5030A EPA S030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A EPA 5030A 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 3260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 8260 S 5 S 5 5 5 50 200 5 5 5 50 5 5 10 S S 5 5 5 S 5 5 S S 5 5 5 !0 5 5 5 5 10 4!23/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28! 00 4/28/00 4/28.'00 4/28/00 4/28x00 4/28!00 4/28!00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28'00 4/28/00 4/28; 00 4/28.'00 4/28 00 4!28!00 4/28x'00 4/28:00 4/28:00 4/28/00 4/28:00 4/28; 00 4'28:'00 4/281 00 4/28:'00 4/28; 00 4/28100 4/23.'00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4128/00 4/28/00 4/2s/oo 4/28/00 4/28/00 4128;'00 4/28100 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/2S/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4/28/00 4i 28/00 4i2fi/00 4/28/00 v' ~v ~rv Approved By: ~ Date: n_~„ ^f1 Units: ug/lCg (ppb) Basis: Wet Result Result Notes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 Date C ollected: NA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: NA EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Name: Method Blank Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Lab Code: 5200428-SB1 Basis: Wct Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Dibromochloromethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/23/00 ND 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28!00 4/28/00 ND Chlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/23!00 4/28/00 ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/23/00 4/28!00 ND Ethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Total Xylenes EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28!00 4/28/00 ND Styrene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Bromoform EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Isopropylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 5030A 8260 5 I 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Bromobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND n-Propylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/23!00 4/28/00 ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 4/23/00 ND tert-Burylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/23!00 4/23/00 ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA 5030A 5260 20 1 4/28/00 4/23/00 ND sec-Burylbenzerie EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/23/00 4/2S/00 ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 4-Isopropyltoluene EPA'S030A 8260 20 ] 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND n-Burylbenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28100 4/28/00 ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 5 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 1,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/23'00 4/28/00 ND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/28x'00 4/28/00 IT'D Naphthalene EPA 5030A 8260 20 I 4/28/00 4/28/00 ND Hexachlorobutadiene EPA 5030A 8260 20 1 4/2S/00 4/28/00 ND // i Approved By: 'VII Date: ~} ~U~ ~~~ IS2P/020597p D., ..e 77 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Henshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 Date Collected: NA LCS Matrix: Soil Date Received: NA Date Extracted: 4/28/00 Date Analyzed: 4/28/00 Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate Laboratory Control Sample Summary Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte 1,1-Dichloroethene Benzene Trichloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Approved By: DLCS/O?0597p Lab Control Sample 5200428-LCS, S200428-DLCS Units: ug/Kg (ppb) Basis: Wet Percent Recovery CAS Relative Prep Analysis True Value Result Acceptance Percent Method Method LCS DLCS LCS DLCS LCS DLCS Limits Difference EPA 5030A 8260 l00 100 92 94 92 94 61-145 2 EPA 5030A 8260 100 100 100 100 100 100 76-127 <1 EPA 5030A 8260 100 l00 98 94 98 94 71-120 4 EPA 5030A 8260 100 100 91 91 91 91 76-125 <1 EPA 5030A 8260 100 100 100 100 100 100 75-130 <] Date: ~ [7 ~ . Result Notes D., ..o 7d COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert Blvd./268.A.01 Sample Matriz: Soil Prep Method: EPA 5030A Analysis Method: 8260 Sample Name Lab Code GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007 GS-4 Comp. S2001344-008 Lab Control Sample S200428-LCS Lab Control Sample 5200428-DLCS Method Blank 5200428-SB 1 Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Date Eztracted: NA Date Analyzed: NA Surrogate Recovery Summary Volatile Organic Compounds Units: PERCENT Basis: NA Test P e r c e n t R e c o v e r y Notes Dibromofluoromethane Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 92 98 88 94 102 90 103 102 91 98 100 88 99 99 87 CAS Acceptance Limits: 57-167 62-138 62-140 ~~ l~o~ ~~ Approved By: Date: Sl'R3/020397p COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SE~2VICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert BlvdJ268.A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Sample Name: GS-1 Comp. Lab Code: 52001344-007 Test Notes: Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis llilution llate llate Analyte Method Method NiRL !"'actor 1~:xtracted Analyzed Result Alpha-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Gamma-BHC (Lindane) EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Beta-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.03 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Heptachlor EPA 3550 8031 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Delta-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Heptachlor Epoxide EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endosulfan I EPA 3550 8081 0.01 l 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND 4'-DDE 4 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND , Dieldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND 4'-DDD 4 EPA 3550 8031 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND , Endosulfan II EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4129/00 ND 4'-DDT 4 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26100 4/29/00 ND ' , Endrin Aldehyde EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 D IT Endosulfan Sulfate EPA 3550 8081 0.01 ] 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Methoxychlor EPA 3550 3031 0.02 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND ' Toxaphene EPA 3550 8081 0.3 1 4/26!00 4/29/00 Iv D Chlordane EPA 3550 8081 0.1 1 4/26/00 4129%00 ND Aroclor 1016 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1221 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 I 4/26!00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1232 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1242 EPA'3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1248 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1254 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4!29/00 ND Aroclor 1260 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Approved By: Date: Service Request: 52001344 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Result Notes T-.-.. 1L COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SE~tVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Project: Gellert B]vdJ268.A.01 Sample Matrix: Soil Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Sample Name: GSA Comp. Lab Code: S2001344-008 Test Notes: Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Basis: Wet Prep Analysis llilution llate llate Analyte Method Method MRL I~'actor ~;xtracted Analyzed Kesult Alpha-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Gamma-BHC (Lindane) EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Beta-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.03 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Heptachlor EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Dclta-BHC EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4;26/00 4/29/00 ND Heptachlor Epoxide EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endosu]fan I EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND 4,4'-DDE EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Dieldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND 4,4'-DDD EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29!00 ND Endosulfan II EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26!00 4/29/00 ND 4,4'-DDT EPA 3550 8081 0.01 I 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endrin Aldehyde EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Endosulfan Sulfate EPA 3550 8081 0.01 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Methoxychlor EPA 3550 8081 0.02 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Toxaphene EPA 3550 8081 0.3 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Chlordane EPA 3550 8081 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 N'D Aroclor 1016 EPA 350 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29100 ND Aroclor 1221 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1232 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29100 l~'D Aroclor 1242 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1248 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND Aroclor 1254 EPA 3550 8082 O.l ] 4/26/00 4/29/00 l~'D Aroclor 1260 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 1 4/26/00 4/29/00 ND i / t"1 ~ IZ Approved By: Date: Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: 4/24/00 Date Received: 4/26/00 Kesult Notes Unnn 77 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SE)EtVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Project: Sample Matrix: Sample Name: Lab Code: Test Notes: Analyte Alpha-BHC Gamma-BHC (Lindane) Beta-BHC Heptachlor Delta-BHC Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide Endosulfan I 4,4'-DDE Dieldrin Endrin 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan Il 4,4'-DDT Endrin Aldehyde Endosulfan Suifate Methoxychlor Toxaphene Chlordane Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1243 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1260 Renshaw Associates, Inc. Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 Soil Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Method Blank 5200426-SB 1 Yrep Analysis Method Method MRL EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.03 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 O.OI EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 O.OI EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.01 EPA 3550 8081 0.02 EPA 3550 8081 0.3 EPA 350 8081 0.1 EPA 3550 8052 0.1 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 EPA 3550 5082 0.t EPA 3550 8032 0.1 EPA 3550 8032 0.1 EPA 3550 8082 0.1 Service Request: S2001344 Date Collected: NA Date Received: NA Dilution Date Date N'actor Extracted Analyzed 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4!26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4!26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/26/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4/29/00 4!29/00 4/29/00 Units: mg/ICg (ppm) Basis: Wet Kesult Kesult Notes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 1~~ Approved By: V ~ Date: [~ L 1 Pave 28 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert Blvd.l268.A.01 Date Collected: NA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: NA Date Extracted: 4/26/00 Date Analyzed: 4/29/00 Matrix SpikeJDuplicate Matrix Spike Summary Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Sample Name: GS-1 Comp. Units: mg/Kg (ppm) Lab Code: S2001344-007MS, 52001 344-007DMS Basis: Wet Test Notes: Percent Recovery . CAS Relative Prep Analysis Spike Level Sample Spike Result Acceptance Percent Result Analyte Method Method MRL MS DMS Result b1S DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes Gamma-BHC (Lindane) EPA 3550 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.091 0.091 91 91 52-125 <1 Heptachlor EPA 3550 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.090 0.038 90 83 38-147 2 Aldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.094 0.092 94 92 51-124 2 Dieldrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.092 0.092 92 92 57-130 <1 Endrin EPA 3550 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.120 0.120 120 120 54-143 <1 4,4'-DDT EPA 350 8081 0.01 0.1 0.1 ND 0.043 0.044 43 44 40-157 2 Approved By: ' Date: ~~~ I'~ D",o 70 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. QA/QC Report Client: Renshaw Associates, Inc. Service Request: S2001344 Project: Gellert B1vdJ268.A.01 Date Collected: NA Sample Matriz: Soil Date Received• NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: NA Surrogate Recovery Summary Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphe nyls (PCBs) Prep Method: EPA 3550 Units: PERCENT Analysis Method: 8081/8082 Basis: NA Test Percent Recovery Sample 1~'ame Lab Code Notes Decachlorobiphenyl GS-1 Comp. 52001344-007 104 GS-4 Comp. S2001344-008 103 GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007MS 104 GS-1 Comp. S2001344-007DMS 96 Method Blank 5200426-SB 1 102 CAS Acceptance Limits: 49-145 Approved By: Date: U. ~~C~/'~ SUR7/OS?393 r.__ ,n O O O Q. ~ W Q a ~~ V J ~ ~ a z~ n. 0 ~ a ~ ~ ~ m (~{~ J O ~ ~ 0 0 ~ J ~ z V w l1.. a w . ~. m w Z ~ a w _ ~ U 0 ~o Q~ U rn ~~ m~ U ~ ~~ N X LL t ~ C O O U ~ `o °i U ~ <~ ~~ rr~i O ~ v~f~ •~. V °c~~~ v°°Q`.'~ Q s a ~' ~= cn Y r ~ U d T U~ ~ v ~ ~ 0) -'~ ~" g iu Z .a y ~ ."tea ea`o c 1V ` Q ~ O ~ '0 /~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 Q 3 : = ¢ = a~t o~ A ~ ~ w ~ £ ~ N _ O ¢ c te'''a va ~ is ~ ° C O O ~ a. > j p ca CL C c N O U ~ ~ C C/J ~ Q Q~ U ~~ U ~ w _ m ~ Q ~ I I I l v ~ ~ Z <o , Y J W a th ~ Z ~N t o M' W ~^~ O V Q a ~ W ~ o z ~ N o o~ = I I 2 v Vr ~- N lJJ "' a o _ ~ a ~ ~ o c ~ ~ ~ W N~1 d l y ' e~0 ~ I ~ ~ ~ /e o d O SS 0 ~ N ~ ^ a~ 1 S0 N ~~ 00 N/ ~ j v N N Z = 1 ~ N ti Og ~N ' 0 N N ~ cn D '~ ,Q ~ - J l~UQ ~~ t p ` ~1/ y ~/a9 a1pssi0 _0 Nd o ' ~~ } o ~ ~ l.1- ~ c v ` , -) ~--t Z Q a Z c fi /e , k Zg p041a~, ase s/'lam ` l ~pU ~~ o CJ~ 1 U• ~ O `~ z gLb e(r ZBp d [ 8j8~9 s g~8 / ydb ~ ~ w 4. l v ~ uo SW 80d ~ ~, ~ - ~ sad 00 / s sapA~ `° °' U ~ Js ~, ue6'O p~ b/ a L' Z ~ ~ ~ m d C ~ ~ n S N/ase 9 0, .c E ~ ~ ~ ~ U C~ ~l /asa L 0 8 ~ a LL o w m e1Wik~ /O se H 8,y ~ m = 1 L / k~ 8ise d1 ~8ise e s eD B S X . ~ o ~ O ~ ~-- ~ - Nd a/, o ~ pZ 0 e ~ m i ~ ?4 ewo~~9 ydl ` 7~ a cn m ~ m ~~~~ ~ r S~ ~gZB `lpa a a6 %e~9 ~ w v ~ m UC" ~ sJ~Ue6 O a/~l o , ? ~ cn y ~ ~ ~ ~ a U W Z QQ Sa3NId1N00 ~O d39Wf1N -- w ~' ~ z " E m ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ S~- S c~ ~p `° c °' E a ~ ¢ U w ~ m p `~ ~ a cr J cn a o cn ~ v ~ f g ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ `v ~~ ~ m ~ m ~ a LL i w Wi E w W E ~ m m co m l _ ~ ~ C.(~ l/1 rJ ~ ~ m ~ ~ E m ~ ~ z E _, ~ S ~ 0 . _~ ~ ~ ~ N _ r ~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ = ~ ~ d ~ ~ d ~ ~ I O { ( (~ ' o ~- t 3 ~ N s m ~ m ~ ~ w ~, ~~ ~ ~-- '-S ~ ¢ ~ ~ W f" Z N Q C7 cn d Q ~ ~ '~'f C"'F S Z` L E Z ~ m a ¢ a ~ N ... c z ~ E ~ ~ w ¢ ~ ~ m ~ E C I a a v ° n U U v V U V a` u.. o ¢ c CHROMALAB, 1NC. Environmental Services (SDB) Submission #: 2000-05-0335 Date: May 17, 2000 Renshaw Associates 11875 Dublin Blvd, Suite A-200 Dublin, CA 94568 Attn.: Mr. Dennis Laduzinsky Project: 268.A.01 Gellert Blvd. Dear Dennis, Attached is our report for your samples received on Monday May 15, 2000 This report has been reviewed and approved for release. Reproduction of this report is permitted only in its entirety. Please note that any unused portion of the samples will be discarded after June 14, 2000 unless you have requested otherwise. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please call me at (925) 484-1919. You can also contact me via email. My email address is: gcook@chromalab.com Sincerely, ~v° ~ Gary Cook 1220 Quarry Lane' Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telephone: (925) 484-1919 'Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 Printed on: 05/17/2000 10:16 Page 1 Of 1 CHROMALAB, INC. ~ Submission#:2000-05-0335 Environmental Services (SDB) Metals Renshaw Associates ® 11875 Dublin Blvd, Suite A-200 Dublin, CA 94568 Attn: Dennis Laduzinsky Phone: (925) 551-7272 Fax: (925) 551-7464 ' Project #: 268.A.01 Project: Gellert Blvd. Samples Reported Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Lab # GS-4R Soil 04/24/2000 1 1220 Quarry Lane 'Pleasanton, CA 94566756 Telephone: (925) 484-1919' Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 Printed on: 05/17/2000 09:21 Page 1 of 4 C H RO MALAB, INC. Environmental Services (SDB) ' Submission #: 2000-05-0335 To: Renshaw Associates Attn.: Dennis Laduzinsky Metals Test Method: 6010B Prep Method: 30508 Sample ID: GS-4R Project: 268.A.01 Gellert Blvd. Sampled: 04/24!2000 Matrix: Soil Lab Sample ID: 2000-05-0335-001 Received: 05/15/2000 16:45 Extracted: 05/16/2000 13:36 Q C-Batch: 2000/05/16-04.15 Compound Result l Rep.Limit 1 Units 1 Dilution ~ Analyzed ~ Flag Arsenic 1 2.6 _ 1 1.0 mg/Kg 1.00 105/16/2000 21:331 1220 Quarry Lane' Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telephone: (925) 484-1919 'Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 Printed on: 05/17/2000 09:21 Page 2 of 4 CHROMALAB, INC. Environmental Services (SDB) To: Renshaw Associates Attn.: Dennis Laduzinsky Batch QC Report Metals ' Submission #: 2000-05-0335 Test Method: 60108 Prep Method: 30508 Method Blank Soil QC Batch # 2000/05/16-04.15 MB: 2000/05/16-04.15-014 Date Extracted: 05/16/2000 13:36 Compound Result Rep.Limit Units Analyzed Flag Arsenic ND 1.0 mg/Kg 05/16/2000 20:22 1220 Quarry Lane 'Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telephone: (925) 484-1919' Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 Printed on: 05/17/2000 09:21 Page 3 of 4 C H RO MALAB ~ ~ N C. Submission #: 2000-05-0335 Environmental Services (SDB) To: Renshaw Associates Test Method: 60106 Attn: Dennis Laduzinsky Prep Method: 3050B Batch QC Report Metals Laboratory Control Spike (LCS/LCSD) ~ Soil QC Batch # 2000!05/16-04.15 LCS: 2000/05/16-04.15-015 Extracted: 05/16/2000 13:36 Analyzed 05/16/2000 20:26 LCSD: 2000/05/16-04.15-016 Extracted: 05/16/2000 13:36 Analyzed 05/16/2000 20:30 Compound Conc. [ mg/Kg ] Exp.Conc. [ mg/Kg ] Recovery [% RPD Ctrl. Limits [%) Flags LCS LCSD LCS LCSD LCS j LCSD ~ [%] I Recovery RPD LCS LCSD Arsenic 1 107 98.9 100.0 100.0 1 107.0 98.91 7.9 ~ 80-120 20 1220 Quarry Lane 'Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telephone: (925) 484-1919' Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 Printed on: 05/17/2000 09:21 Page 4 Of 4 V 0 0 I ~, ~`' U ~~ ~. - I ~ .. ~~ 61 V ~.. ..... ` ~ 9' N ca t` c ~. ~. ~' ~ M ~ ~ c ~ ! ~ •--, er `o_ ~ U' n _- tV O G i ~ ~ y. m ~., O ~ t. c, • ^~ m G1 c o J C' Z v `m_. ri ~~ fV G~1~ O N ^ U c Z !~ [,' M C u Q u c V Q a u •~ V `~ ~ S2i3Nlt'1.N0;=Oli3BWf1N -~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C ~ ~ ~. t ~ ~ ?~`\ ' \\ ~ I T I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ; ~ Q V ` ` V I I I I ~• -_ I /`~ ~~~ I ( I I ~ ' G (o~ soj aqua rl~u,~c vJ Hd ^ I I I I I I I W ~ < ;. ° ~ Ltin RtiO.il{J icn(en¢IaH ^ _ `_' _ ~• ~ C W ~ I I I I I I a o w c U N C _ oval ll11D1. I I i I I I I N. '~I ~ ~ < N C C ,UL4L/OL7L/OL09 tld31 I + I I I I Sltf1=W LL W~YO I I t ~Z ''N '9d '10 'PO I I ) ( ~slvlaw .l~nl I I ( I . saz. o ss.t a I I I I I ~ -`' -puo, oadg ^ I I I . - O I I I { ( c O ~ r' 7 OLZ8 G Aq s.t1Nd I I w ~ W - n c (0808 tld3) S.9~d ^ i l l l I , ~ ~ ~~ a ~ u' w y _ ` ` (0808 tld31S3a1.^.LLS3d ^ ~ / _ _ < ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a I I I I I I I I _ - IW - ~ ~ ti99i ^ IE;~.L ^ I~-~ad^ I I I I I I I I C _ ~~ . ` c 9 < as~:as~ ~ I''O IOLZ3 b'd3) I I I I S3111tf7OniW3S I I I I (0928 tfd31 l9oON I ~ solNdsao 3-ttl.tflon I I I I ~ I I ~OTO8 tld3) ~sJOA.H) ' '" ~ I I I I I I I ( ~ , 302L 1d SNOHZitlJOZYFi 3 ISt C W W d ~ W ~ nv~oo'o-zu^ I~nlaa. I ( ( I ( N < ~ Q , _ W I I I - as,f 1W5L08 bid-) I a-Hdl I I I I I I I I _ ~ W H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ I OZOS t ld3f X318 I I I ( I I I I I .J 50 11`d WO4l1f 3letf3'J>3nd: w ~ J --0 381W p X31 8 O /~"~ 3°`.1 ~ I O ~ (O Z08'SL 081Ya31-Hdl I I I I I I ~.. ~ ~' p~ N W 1~ G W, J 2 ~ O ~ 9~ - (J ~" Xf - Z . . O ~ u - _ _. ~ i V=LL~ , V W W C l ~ rs ~ ~ ~ O ~ o ~ ~ 1 C ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ U ~ N s W 3 C n J G ~ - T ~ < ~ ~ O , Y , ~ ~ ~~----~~ ~ ~ _` r _ _ ~ G Q Cv ~ . I 1 _ -~ ~ ` 1 u ` Y ~ + .~ ~ T ~ N ,~ ~ ~ ° - ~ ~ ~ t ` C~J ~ C ( U _ ~ S ~ ~ 1 y I L y T S S ..~ ~ 1 W ~ <~ N C w ~` ~ .. C V ~ ~ H W N ~ ~ 1 . ~~ O~ - ~ ~ = Q y ~ "' ~ W N f'n ~ 01 v .9 ~ ; `~ ~ v o d" o c ~ v J~ v ~. ~V W g d ~, ~ ~~ N APPENDIX H ADDITIONAL SOIL QUALITY EVALUATION FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 46 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX N0. -y ~~ Renshaw Associates, Inc. Environmental Engineering Services 1"cbruary 9, 2001 Ms. Carol Anne Painter Doc Iiousiug I'arlners, Incorporated 14107 Winchester Boulevard, Suite I-T I,os Gatos, CA 95032-5960 l~l: Additional Soil Quality Evaluation Gellert Boulevardi> South San rraneisco, California Prc~jccf Nu.: 2dc4. fI. U1 1)car Ms. Painter: 4088665501 P, 02,' 15 PROJECT: ~lLE: FHB ~ ~2 zoos O~c kousrNC 1=~~rt~E~,S, rr~u. As rcquosted, Ilenshaw Associates, Incorporated, has performed an additional e~•aluation of shallow soil duality at the Gellert Boulevard project site in South San f~rancisco, California. The evaluation w~1s performed to provide confirn7ation of the test results for arsenic prwiou~ly reported in the Phase 1 Prc~lirrrintrry Side .~ssessmen~ crud Lirnitecl Soil Otrcrlit}~ In1•es•ti~ratloj7, Cicllcr~ >3ntrlevarcl, Snarth Satr FrcrrrcisCO, Ccrlifa•nin, submitted as a drag 011 Junc 9, 2000. 'I he evrllt.lation was additionally pc:rforn7cd Lo assess the possible presence of chromium VI in shallow soil at the site. 'I'17c site is located on Gcllcrt Boulevard in South San Francisco, northwest of the intersection of Gellert and Westborough Boulevards. 'I•he site consists oI'a steep, narrow parcel, sloping cast to CTellerl i3ouleva.rd. f1 limited soil quality investigation was previously conducted in a level area on flit sotltl~reast portion of tl7c site where concrete debris anti other trash had been observed. During the present evaluatson, soil simples were collected at depths of approximately one foot and four feet at tlucc locations, in the vicinity of the soil samples previously collcctcd and analyred during the June 2000 Phase I investigation. Samples were collcctcd with a hand auger, n7at7ually piaccd in lahoratory~supplied sample jars, labeled, and stored in a cooled container Cur ;r~nsport to the laboratory under ehlin-of-custody control_ Two composite satnplcs, one front oue root bas (P.S-l,? 3-1) and one from four feet bgs (RS-1,2,3-~), were analy:red for total arsenic using hPA Method ~OI013 and hexavalent chromium (Chromium VI) tisini: EPA Method '119GA. Ciaf ilcs126R11 U34 ! •Ol.wpd U Z!U')/U I 11$75 Dublin BoulPVard, Suite A-200 • Dublin, CA 94568 • Tel; 925/551-7272 Fax: 925/551-7464 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05;47 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX N0. 4088665501 P. 03'15 Hid Renshaw Associates, Inc. Chcnlieal test results are san1t11arizcd in Table 1, and the laboratory analytical report is attaclled t0 this lCttCr. AS Sl10Wn 011 Table 1, the conlPosite soil samples slid not contain arsenic or 1lexavalellt ehro111ium above the laboratory method reporting limit;. Based on the chemical test results, shallow soils at the site do not appear to be inlpactcd by arsenic or chronliunl VI. We ap}u•eciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this Project. Please clo not hesitate to c~.ill should you have ally q(iCSlIU11S Or CCC~l12rE addltlOnal 1nfOrn7atl011. 5111CCICly, 1[c~ishaw Associates, Incorlmrated ~~ I)cnnis Ladu~insky, C.N:.(J_, R.B.A. Senior I'rojcct M~ula~er I)L:kc1 Lahor~itory Reports o?ro~~ro 2 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 47 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FRX N0. 4088665501 P, 04,'15 NA TA13X.E 1 Soil Analytical Results Ccltcrt Boulevard South San l~rancisco, California _ Analytc RS--1,2,3-Y ltll-1,2,34 TT)C.C PRC Arsenic -EPA GUIOR • ,~~ NT) NU 500 22 Chromium V1 - fiPA 7196A NU NI) 500 30 NOTES RS-1,2,3-1: cornposilc of samples collected from three locations at a depth of one foot. 1t5-1,2,3-4' composite of samples collected from three locations at a depth of four feet, Results reported in m[;/1:~ (parts per million) NI): Not detected at or above the laboratory method reporting limns I'R(.~: Pr~limiciary Remeciiatioii Goal for residci~tial land use -EPA lZc~ian TX '[°T[~C: 'Total Threshold Limit Conceutratioii (i:11'ilcsV68110336.Ol.sls U2/U4; 0 I FEB-20-2001 TUE 05:47 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX N0, 4088665501 P, 05,'15 STL ChromaLab Ernvironmenlal SorviGes (CA 1093) Renshaw Associates 11875 Dublin Slvd, Suite A-200 publin, CA 94568 Aitn.: Ms. Katherine Davem C~roject: 268.A.01 Gellert bear Katherine, Submission #: 2001-02-0063 Date' February 7, 2001 Attached is our report for your samples received on Monday February 5, 2001 This report has been reviewed and approved for release. Reproduction of this report is permitted only ir1 its entirety. Please note that any unused portion of the samples will be discarded after March 22, 2001 unless you have requested otherwise. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please cali me at (925) 484-1919. You can also contact me via email. My email address is: vvancil@chromalab.com Sincerely, Vincent Vancil 1220 Quarry LanC ' Plcas~nton, CA 94S6G-4756 Telephone: (92.5) 484-1919 `Facsimile: (925) 404-1096 CA pH5 >=LAPll1096 l'ritded nn; 02/07/2001 10,39 Page 1 of 1 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 47 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 06,'15 ~TL ChromaLab 5nvironm©nlal Services (CA 1094) HexavalEnt Chromium Submission #: 2001-02.006: ' Nensl~aw Associates ~ 11875 Dublin Blvd, Suite A-200 Dublin, CA 94568 Attn: Katherine Dayem Phone: (925) 551-7272 Fax: (925} 551-7464 Project k: 268.A.01 Project: Gellert Samples Reported Sample ID Matrix date Samplt~d Lab # FMS-1,2,3-i Soil 02/05/2001 1 RS-1,2,3-4 Soit 02/05/2001 ?_ 1220 Quarry Lanc ' Pleasanton, CA 94566.475E Telephone: (925) 484.1919 "Facsimile: (925) 484-106 Pnniea on: 02/a7l20a1 10:23 Page 1 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 47 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS STL Chrorn2~Lab Environipantal Services (CA 1094) To: Renshaw Associates Attn.: Katherine D<ayem FAX N0. 4088665501 P. 07,'15 Submission #: 2001-02-006~~ Test Method: 7196A Prop Method: 7196A soil t-Iexavalent Chromium Samplo IC: RS-1,2,3-1 Project: 268.A.01 Gellert Sampled: 02!05/2001 Matrix: Soil yap sample iu : zuU1-02-0063001 Received : 02!05 /2 0 01 17: S 0 Extracted: 02/06/2001 15:09 QC-Batch: 2001/02106-01.31 ~' (:ornpound Result ~ Rep.Limit ~ Units bilution j Analyzed ~ Flag Chromium (Fiexavalcnt) Nb j 0.20 ; mg/Kg ~ 1.00 'I02l06/2001 15:30. ~ 7220 Quarry Lana ' Pleas;~ntan, CA 9456E-4756 Tclcphona: (925) 484-1919' F9csimile' (925) 484-1096 printed on: 02/07/2001 10:23 Page 2 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05;48 Ply DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 08,'15 ~TL ChromaLab Submission #: 2001-02-006:1 ~nvironrnental S2rviLes (Cl11094) To: Hcnshaw Associates Test Method: 719GA Alln.: Katherine Dayem prep Method: 7196A soil Hexavafent Chromium Sample ID: RS-1,2,3-4 Project: 2G8.A.01 Gellert Sampled: 02/05/2001 Matrix: Soil Lab Sample ID: 2001-02-0063-002 Roceived: 02/05/2001 17:50 Extracted: 02/06/2001 15:09 Q C-Batch : 2001/02/06 -01.31 Compound j Result ~ Rep.~imit Units i Dilution 1 Analyzed j Flag Chromium (Hexavalerrt) ND 0.20 mg/Kg j 1.00 02/06/2001 15:30 12?_0 Quarry t_ane' Plcasanfon, Cn 94566-h756 Tale~honc: (925) r18a-1919 ~ Facsimile: (925) A84-1096 Printed on; 02107/2001 10:23 Page 3 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 48 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX NO. 4088665501 P, 09,'15 STL ChromaL.ab Environ,t~entai Services (CA 109~I) To: Hertshaw Associates Atln.: KaUierino Dayem Method Slank M Ei: 2001 /02/06-01.31-001 Submission #: 2001-02-006:1 Test Method: 7196A Prep Method: 7196A soil Batch QC Report Hexavalent Ghromium Soil QC Batch # 2001102/06-01.31 Date Extracted: 02/06/2001 15:30 Compound Chromium (Hexavalent) ND ~.. !0.2 ~ mg/Kg ! 02/06/2001 15:301 1220 Ouarry Lane Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telephunc~: (9?.5) 484-1919' Facsimile: (925) 484-1096 PrintcJ an: 02/07/2001 10:7.3 Page 4 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05:48 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS ~TL ChromaLab Environmental Services (CA 1094) 'To: Nenshaw Associates lltln.: Katherine Dayem Motals Sample ID: RS-1,2,3-4 I'roioct: 2G$.A.01 Gellert Sampled: 02/0/2001 Matrix: Soil Y" FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 13,'15 Submission #: 2001-02-006:3 Test Method; 60108 Prep Method: 30506 Lab Sample ID ; 200102-0063-002 Received: 02105/200117:50 Extracted: 02/06/2001 06:18 QC-Batch: 2001102106-02.15 Compound Arsenic Result ~ Rep-Limit ~ Units Dilution j Analyzed Flag j ND ~ 1.0 ~ mg/Kg ~ .... 1.00 . _.:02/06/2001 15:57 12?0 Quarry Lane' Plcasanlan, CA 94506-4756 Telc~phono: (925) 484.1919 `Facsimile: (025) 484-1006 ^.a„tc:i on: 0210%I1oo1 10;24 Page 3 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 48 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS ~TL ChromaLab Environmental Scrvicos (CA 1094) To: Renshaw Associates Alln.: Katherino bayem Metals Sample ID. RS-1,2,3-1 Project: 268./1.01 Gellert Sampled: 02/05/2001 Matrix: Soil Compound Arsenic FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 12,'15 Submission #: 2001-02.006.3 Test Method. 60106 Prep Melhod: 30508 Lab Sample ID; 2001-02-0063-001 Received: 02/05/2001 17:50 Extracted : 0?.106/2001 06:18 QC-Batch; 2001102106-02.15 _ ~ 'Result ~ Rep.Limit ~ Units Dilution ~ Analyzed I Flard ~ ND j 1.0 i mg/Kg j 1.00 X02/06/2001 15:541 ~i 1220 Cuarry bane ' Pluasanlon, CA 94506-4756 'I'clephonc: (025) 484.1913 " Facs+milo: (97.5) 484.109G f'r~nlcd on: 02/0')/2001 10,24 Paye 2 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 48 Phl DUC HOUSING PARTNERS FAX NO. 4088665501 P, 11,'15 S7'L Chro-7'1aLab Submission #: 2001-02.006 ~nvirorunent6l Services (CA 1094) Metals HenshawAssociates aq 11875 Rublin~l3lvd, Suite A-200 D~Fblin, CA 94568 /1ttn: Katherine t7ayem Phone: (925) 551-7272 Fax: (925) 551-7464 Project #: 268.A_01 Project: Gellert Samples Reported Sam le ID _...._. ._. _..__.... - P-- ,• ~.~. _ _.,, , ._~_ Matrix pate Sampled dab # ~ RS-1,2,3-1 ~ Soi~•~ 02/05/2001 ~ _~ 1 ,,_-~ ~ F2S-1,2,3-4 Soil ~ 02105/2001 ~, _, .. f 220 Quarry Lanc "Pleasanton, CA 94566-4756 Telrphor,e: (925) 484.1979 'Facsimile: (925) 484-109G Prinlcd nn; 07.10%l20p1 10:24 Page 1 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05:48 Phl DUC HOUSING PARTNERS ~TL ChromaLab Environmental Services (CA 1094) To: Renshaw Associates Attn.: Katherine Dayem Sample Ib: RS-1,2,3-4 Project: 2Gt3.A_01 Gellert Sampled: 02/05/2001 Matrix: Soil FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 13,15 Submission #: 2001-02-006:3 Test Method: 60105 Prep Method: 30506 Motals Lab Sample ID; 2001 X02-0063-OD2 Received: 02/05/2001 17:50 Extracted: 02/06/2001 06:18 QC-Batch: 2001102106-02.15 impound Result Rep_Limit ~ Units Dilution ~ Analyzed Flag 1.0 ~ mg/Kg j 1.00 02/06/2001 15:57 Arsenic ND 1220 Quarry Lane' Plcasanfnn, CA 9~5G6-47S6 Te!c~phona, (925) 494.1919 `Facsimile: (025} 484•i00r; ^"::1:C~~ gin: 02/0%/2001 10:24 Page 3 Of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 49 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS ~TL ChramaLab Environmentfrl Scrvires (Cn 1034) To: Renshaw Associates Ailn.: Katherine Dayom ~ Method Blank MB: 2001 /02/06-02.15-023 FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 14,'15 Submission #: 2001-02-OOS3 Batch QC RvpoK Metals Soil Test Method: 60108 Prep Method: 3050B QC t3atch # 2001l02106~02.15 aaie Extracted: 02/06/2001 06: i B Compel Arsenic R©sult ~Rep.Limit ~ Units 1 Analyzed j Flan ! ND 1,0 mg/Kg 02/0$/200114;561 1220 nudrry Lano ^ Pleasanton, Gn 945GG-4756 Telephone: (97.5) 484-1919 "Facsimile: (925) 484.109G F'rinlcd an: 0?/07l'1UO t 10:24 P;tge 4 of 5 FEB-20-2001 TUE 05 49 PM DUC HOUSING PARTNERS ~TL ChromaLab Environrttgnl~l Service; (CA 1094) To; iienshaw Associates Attn: KatherinQ bayer» Submission #: 2001-02.006:1 Test Method: 60108 Prep Method: 3050B Batch QC Report Metals ._..... i Laboratory Control Spike (I.CSILCSp) SoiC QC Batch # 2001102/06-02.15 i LCS: 2001102/06-02.15-024 Extracted: 02/06/2001 06;18 Analyzed 02/06/2001 14:59 LCSb: 2001/02/06-02.15-025 Extracted: 02/061200106:18 Analyzed 02/06/200115:03 Compqund ArsenlC Canc. [ mg/Kg ] Exp.Conc. (mg/Kg j Recovery [%~~ Rpp I ... Ctrl. Limits [%] f Flags .LCS LCSD LCS ~ LCSD LCS'LCSD /„ C' ] __ Recovery RPD LCS 'LCSD 10a 107 100.0 i 100.0 105.0 107.0 1.9 80-120 ~ 7.0 1. 1220 Quarry l.Ane " Ploas2nton. CA 94566-4756 Tclaphone: (925) 484.1913 " Facsimiles: (925) 494-1096 FAX N0. 4088665501 P, 15,'15 @rintud on; OJ0713001 10:24 Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX GEOLOGIC REPORTS :, i , BGC Via Facsimile and Vlail BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL August 7, ?000 CONSULTANTS Job No. 2395.101 Ms Carol Anne Painter Duc Housing Partners 1107 Winchester Boulevard, Suite H Los Gatos, California 95032 Subject: ivlarbella Project Gellert Boulevard South San Francisco, California Dear Ms Painter: As requested by ~1r. Paul Kreiger of Wilsey Ham, this letter provides our response to the city of South San Francisco review comments, especially Comment I-H, regarding the subject project. ~Ve previously performed apreliminary geotechnical inr•estigation at the site and presented the results in our June 1, 2000 report. The site is siniated in the Coast Range geomorphic province of California and is seismically dominated by the presence ofthe active San Andreas fault system. The San Andreas fault system is the general boundary between the northward moving Pacific Plate and the southward moving North American Plate. In the San Francisco Bav Area, relative plate movement is distributed across a complex system of generally strike-slip, right lateral parallel and subparallel faults, which include the San Andreas, Hai-ward, and Calaveras faults, among others. The site is not located in a State of California Special Studies Zone (1982) for ground rupture faulting. No faults are mapped on the site. In the vicinity of the site; the San Andreas, San GreQorio and Monte Vista -Shannon faults arz located approximately 1, 5 and 18 miles to the southwest, respectively . Several other faults in the area include the Hayward fault located about 19 miles to the northeast; the Calaveras fault located about 27 miles to the southwest; the Rogers Creek fault located about 31 miles to the north; and the Concord -Green Valley faults located about 31 miles northeast. Because of the proximity to the San Andreas, San Gregorio, Hayward and Monte Vista -Shannon faults; it is our opinion that the site will subject to very strong ground shaking during a major earthquake on one or more of these faults, as well as other active faults in the San Francisco Bay Area. According to the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (L'BC), the following parameters should be incorporated in the structural design of the proposed houses: Seismic Zone 4 Soil Profile Type Sc Seismic Source Type A Closest Distance to Known Seismic Source (San Andreas Fault) 1~. km r August 7, 2000 Job No.2395.101 Page 2 It is our opinion that the structural integrity of the proposed houses is a primary factor in determining possible seismic damage and that the level of seismic damage would be only nominally influenced by the foundation system selected. We recommend that, at a minimum, the proposed houses be designed in conformance with the current edition of the UBC. We trust this letter provides the information you require at this time. If you have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, B RLO ASR ~,GEOT IE~'Y~:~"SULTA1~iTS P u Sal-Wu1~ La1 ~ `;~ ~ /~ ~ ' ~ incipal Engineer '~ - `~'~ ~.-;';~~ - `~ E 2326, Esp. 1?/31%S3~- ^~_-:-~ ;~~ ; .:~;' ,= - PSL:pv Copies: Addressee (3) Wilsey Ham (3 -Hand Delivery) Attention: NIr. Paul Kruger wp9/le:ter.!9431 BERLOGAR GEOTECHNiCAL CONSULTANTS SOIL ENGINEERS ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GELLERT PROPERTY GELLERT BOULEVARD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FOR DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. June I, 2000 BGC June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Ms Cazol Anne Painter Duc Housing Partners 14107 Winchester Boulevard, Suite H Los Gatos, California 95032 Subject: Preliminary• Geotechnical Investigation Gellert Property Gellert Boulevard South San Francisco, California Dear Ms Painter: INTRODUCTION GENERAL BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Berlogaz Geotechnical Consultants (BGC) has completed this preliminary geotechnical investigation of the Gellert Property located on Gellert Boulevard in South San Francisco. California. This study has been undertaken to characterize geologic conditions of soil. bedrock; and the existing slope at the site. y BGC reviewed archived reports and documents available at the City of South San Francisco Planning Department and incorporated findings of subsurface data from those reports in this investigation where appropriate. In addition to the City~s archived documents, other relevant reports, maps. and geologic literature were reviewed in the course of this investigation. References consulted during the course of this investigation follow the text. SCOPE The primary geologic issues affecting the proposed development include stability of the e~cisting cut slope, possible presence of daylighted bedrock dip. possible presence of shallow ground water, site drainage, soil slumps, and earthquake hazards. To investigation these potential geologic issues we conducted the following: • Examined stereo-paired aerial photographs covering the site and vicinity; • Reviewed pertinent geological and geotechnical reports, maps and Iiterature; • Excavated and logged 13 backhoe-excavated test pits: and • Interpreted the geologic findings and prepared this report. ~~-,n ~., r ~~ _-:~:_ ~n_r .~.~~o~~~ .,-.i r r ~'~ .r~- ~i .,.-.i ~, .: .~ Cv~pr: of c-~ ~.~rrw r :~,: -._._ n~~- ~o : .i~vi _ r.~ .. n~~~ ~ ia_ u~ t: June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 2 The location of the site in relation to surrounding cultural features and landmarks is depicted on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Site topography, surface geologic features, and locations of test pits are displayed on the Site Plan, Plate 2. Geologic Cross Sections are presented on Plate 3. Test pit logs are presented in the Appendix of this report. SITE DESCRIPTION The Gellert Property is a roughly wedge-shaped site located along the west side of Gellert Boulevard just north of the intersection with Westborough Boulevard in the City of South San Francisco. San Mateo County. California. The property is bounded on the west by existing residential development (Westborough -West Park Unit No. 3). Gellert Boulevard and the existing residential development are approximately 320 feet apart near the south end of the property and come toQe*~her at the north, wedge-point; end of the property. Bettiveen the south end of the Gellert Propem~and Westborough Boulevard there are an Arco service station, a IVIacDonalds' restaurant. a medical dental commercial facility, and undeveloped commercial-zoned property between the restaurant and the medical/dental facility . The site was extensivel~~ graded reportedly' in the Late 1970's with till thicknesses up to 40 feet and cut depths up to 1=10 feet. Topography of the site is dominated by an approximately 100-foot high 1.5 horizontal to 1 ~~ertical (l.tiH:1V) slope with approximately 10-foot ~~ide benches at 30-foot vertical intervals. The toe of the cut lies along a line about ~0 feet in from Gellert Boulevard. All but the southern end of the slope is in cut; the southern end is an engineered till slope. The portion of the site between the toe of the cut slope and Gellert Boulevard is relatively flat. Drainage collection facilities include concrete-lined V-ditches; asphalt paved s«~ales. Field inlets and drain pipes. According to Earth Systems Consultants (June 7, 1930. some shallow subdrains; in the form ofgravel-filled cottnterfort trenches with outlet pipes also exist above some of the benches on the slope below Williams Court (northern portion of the sitej. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development plans depict 73 single-family residences to be built on the site. The development as proposed will consist of a single road that will have lots located on all of the downhill side of the road; and most of the uphill side of the road as shown on the Site Plan. The proposed grading consists of cuts on the uphill side of the road up to 1 ~ feet in depth and tills on the do~.vnhill side of the road ttp to 1 ~ feet in depth. Retaining walls ranging up to about 10 feet will be placed to support the new cut slopes. June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 3 FINDINGS FIELD OBSERVATIONS During our site visit on iV1ay 2; 2000, our field geologist noted that most of the V-ditches that are present along the back portions of the cut benches were partially or completely filled and clogged with soil and debris. Portions of some V-ditches were open and held standing water but did not drain because of down slope clogging. Pampas grass clumps are abundant in areas where water is ponded in drainage ditches and along the backs of the cut benches. Pampas grass clumps are also present on the slope face in the south central portion of the property but less than at the backs of the cut benches. The presence of these phreatiphytic (water-loving) grasses are common where springs and seeps occur and therefore can indicate areas where ground water is very near the surface. In general, larger shrub-size plants at the project site prefer the cut drainage courses and the fill area in the south portion of the property. During our site visit on IViav Z, ?000, water was observed standing in surface depressions east of Wren Court along the upper bench that forms the PG&E access road. The water had an odor of sewage and may have originated from broken utility lines off-site to the west. Soil slumps, involving a thin layer of soil (less than 6 to 12 inches) and vegetation which has developed on the slopes after grading, have occurred in the north central portion ofthe property and along most of the upper cut slope near the west property line. The shallow- slumps often expose bedrock. A recent earthflo~v landslide and several, smaller similar features are present in the south portion of the property near the property Line with the medical-dental facility. These failures are in the portion of the slope exposing engineered fill. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The structural grain of the San Francisco Peninsula and most of coastal California is controlled by the activity of the northwest-southeast trending San Andreas Fault system. The San Andreas Fault is a major right-lateral, strike-slip transform fault that forms the tectonic boundary between the continental North American Plate and the oceanic Pacific Plate and e;ctends from Cape ~Iendicino southward into the Gulf of California. The fault comes on land north of the project site in Daly City, and extends down the peninsula ridge toward southern California. In the San Francisco Bay Area the transform movement between the tectonic plates takes place on several faults collectively known as the San Andreas fault system. The active fault system consists of several roughly parallel fault traces including the San Andreas (located about 1 mile southwest of the site), San Gregorio-Seal Cove (6 miles southwest), Hayward (17 miles northeast), Calaveras (28 miles northeast), and Greenville (34 miles northeast) faults. Qta~ /7~ ~ ~ !'~IlTLl~1..77~17!'.11 f'~1iIC1 :1 T \ \ITC June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 4 East of the San Andreas Fault in the area of the project site, pre-Holocene bedrock consists of Plio- Pleistocene Age (10,000 years to 5 million years before present) Merced Formation. Pampeyan (1981) describes the Merced Formation as moderately consolidated but commonly friable, yellowish- to grayish-orange where weathered, toblueish-gray. where fresh, thick bedded to massive fine sandstone, siltstone, and clayey sandstone. Bedding in the Merced Formation is indistinct but in places is defined by layers containing abundant marine shells and sand dollars; locally the fossiliferous layers are moderately cemented and hard. FIELD INVESTIG:~TION BerloQar Geotechnical Consultants conducted a field exploration on Nlav 10, 2000. Thirteen test pits ranging in depths from 4 to 15 feet were excavated with grubber-tired backhoe. The test pits were backfilled with the excavated material and were not compacted. siltstone bedrock was encountered in Test Pit TP-11 located in the north end of the prof ect site. Test Pit TP-12 vas located in the southeastern corner of the property; and encountered fill and no ground water to the depth of the test pit at 15 feet. Landslide debris was encountered in Test Pit TP-13 located in the toe area of the mapped landslide in the sottth portion of the property. The landslide debris extended to a depth of 3 feet and overlaid fill to the depth of the test pit at 10 feet. No Around water was encountered in Test Pit TP-13. y The other ten test pits at the project site encountered fine-grained sandstone below a d:in ('/ to 1 ! foot thick) mantle of soil. Generally, the test pits revealed fine-gained sandstone that is moderately weathered; friable to weal:. and moderateh~ fractured. In places sandstone beds were encountered that are well-indurated, fossiliferous, and firmly cemented with cnstalline carbonate (probably re~vorl:ed from the included shells and shell fragments). Calcite-filled joints and fractures at various orientations were noted in most test pits. In a few places; fractures were infilled with aVpSllm. Sandstone exposed in the test pits was light brown ~yhere weathered. In most of the test pits the bedrock below a depth of about 2 feet is light blue indicating the past presence of a reducing zone below a fluctuating ground water table. The reducing zone roughly parallels the cut-slope surface and extends to the depth of the test pits. The presence of the reducing zone suggests that ground water may be very close to the cut-slope surface during the wet portion of the year and, based on the proximity of the reducing zone to the cut surface, is likely- the source of water that seeps out of the slope along the backs of the cut benches. The direction in which the sandstone bedrock at the site slopes (bedrock dip) changes across the site. In Test Pits TP-1 and TP-7, located north of the line of section A-A' shown on the Site Plan, and in outcrop exposures in the same general area, bedrock dip is about 37° to 60° to the northeast. In Test Pit TP-9 and in outcrop exposures located south of the line ofsection A-A', bedrock dip is about 30° to 37° to the southeast. The change in bedrock dip from northeast to southeast in a distance of about X00 feet suggests the presence of an anticline bedrock fold. Test Pits TP-8 and TP-10 were excavated in the area of the expected axis of the anticline to evaluate bedrock dip in that area. These June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page ~ test pits revealed bedrock dip of 10° to 15° to the east along the nose of an east plunging anticlinal fold. These findings indicate that the bedrock dip (10° to the east) is less the cut slope (about 34° to the east) and that bedding daylights this portion of the cut slope. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOiyIlyIENDATIONS GENERAL Other than earthflow°-type slope failures in the south end of the property within fill material and shallow (no involvement in bedrock) soil slumps, the high slope along the western boundary has not experienced any noticeable distress since grading in 1979. From a geotechnical standpoint, development of the site appears to be feasible provided the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the preliminary design of the project. Design criteria for the proposed development should be established in a design-level ~eotechnical investigation, y EXISTING CLTT SLOPE In general, the 20-~ year old cut slope has performed relatively well, given the apparent total lack of maintenance. Shallow slumps have locally developed at several locations. ~t'e judge that these to be caused in Large part by vegetation (such as ice plant) that is too hea~z~ for the sandy soil on the surface of the cut slope. Bedding surfaces can provide a weak laver along which unrestrained blocks of bedrock can break away and slip do~.vnslope. If the dip of the bedrock is out of the hillside so that the potential weak surfaces are "da~~li~hted" (ends of beds are exposed on the slope surface) the stability of the slope potentially is reduced. Sandstone bedding is daylighted in the existing cut slope extending north and south about 200 feet from the line of cross section A-:~' shown on the Site Plan. The cut slope is over 20 years old and the daylighted bedding has not experienced failure. This suggests that failure potential is low; probably as a result of either non-planar bedding or the strength along bedding is sufficient to resist failure. y Ground water is shallow on the cut slope in the area where bedrock bedding daylights and appears to preferentially follow bedding planes to the slope surface. The effects of the shallow ground water in the area of daylighted bedding can be to increase hydrostatic pressure within the sandstone and to promote plant growth, weathering. and soil development. These factors can contribute to a long term decrease in the slope's factor of safety. RFRi (~(:eR (:F~ITF('i-a~ulf ei rnr~ic~ r~Tn~iTc June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 6 EXISTING FILL SLOPE The southern portion of the existing high slope is comprised of engineered fill slope. This fill slope has experienced landsliding. It also contains several smaller soil slumps. Other such features could develop in the future. Inasmuch as the proposed development plan does not have housing units between the interior roadway and the existing fill slope, impact of such features on the proposed development should be minimal. SIL~.LLOW GROUND WATER Although no around water vvas observed seeping from the slope surface during our site visits, presence of shallow ground water is inferred from the occurrence of reducing zones observed in the test pits, water flo~vina into Test Pit TP-10 in the lower south-central portion of the property, and the occurrence of abundant phreatiphytic plants. The presence of inferred shallow ground water appears to correlate with areas of daylighted bedding in the sandstone. The presence of phreatiphytic pampas Grass clumps on the slope at the project site suggests shallow ground water. The pampas grass is most abundant along the backs of the cut benches suggesting that around water may intersect the ground surface at these locations. Ground water seeped into exploratory Test Pit TP-10 located on the flat portion of the property near Gellert Boulevard at a depth of 3 feet. Our subsurface exploration tool: place a few days after a light rain and its likely that ground ~-eater ~yould be deeper in the summer and fall. However, depending on the time of Fear earth moving occurs at the project site, shallow ground water could be intersected in cuts made during grading at the site. Allo~yances for de~l-atering utility trenches. cuts. and steepened slopes should be taken. To maintain an acceptable factor of safety of the cut slope at the project site during the life of the development. grotuid water in the cut slope should be lowered. We recommend that the design level aeotechnical investigation include recommendations for lowering ground water. within the slope. One design which may be considered would be to drill a line of wells vertically into a cut bench above the upper retaining walls. The wells could be backfilled with drain rock, and connected to the lower slope surface by directionally drilling outlet lines back into the slope to intersect the vertical wells near their bottoms. The passively drained wells would lower the piezometric surface within the slope, and increase the slope's factor of safety. Preliminary calculations indicate that such a system of passively drained wells in the area of davliahted bedding at ~0-foot intervals (about 10 wells) is likely to adequately lower ground water at the site. SITE DRAINAGE ;Maintenance of drainage conduits at the project site will be an important aspect to continued stability of the cut slope. Currently. the V-ditches and other drainage conduits are clogged and runoff is impeded. Water is standing in the ditches and can percolate back into the slope where it R~~21 nr:a~ r'Fr-~TrrN~;t~ei r'n~ic~ i+T.ivTc June 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 7 will reduce the safety factor ofthe slope. The design level geotechnical investigation should include drainage design and recommend a maintenance program for the drainage system throughout the life of the development. Drainage design should be coordinated with landscaping and irrigation layout so that excess water can be quickly removed from the slope and not allowed to infiltrate. SOIL SLUMPS Soil slumps are the down slope movement of an accumulation of loose material including rock fragments, soil material, and organic matter. The material becomes detached from the underlying rock mass by chemical or mechanical means, as by decay and disintegration. Soil slips occur at the project site where the weight of soil development and vegetation accumulation overcomes the strength of the material. Soil slumps appear to be concentrated on the cut slope in the north central portion of the property where weathering of the bedrock is shallow. EYISTII\tG FILL The existing fill encountered at the southern end of the project appears to be compacted. Since the existing fill was placed more than 20 years ago, most of the settlements caused by the fill should have occurred. The residual settlement of the existing fill is lil:ely_ to be very small. It is our opinion that this till can generally be left in-place. FOL"~iD.~TION CONSIDER~TIOrS It is our opinion that the proposed houses can be supported on shallow foundations founded in engineered till or bedrock. Deep foundations should not be required. Shallow foundations may consist of footings, structural slab or post-tensioned slab. EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS Ground Rupture The site is not located in a State of California Special Studies Zone (1982) for Around-rupture faulting. No faults are mapped on the site in published geologic maps and our field investigation revealed no evidence of faulting at the site. It is inferred that around rupture at the site as a result of an earthquake is unlikely. Ground Shaking The site is located in a region of high seismicity given the proximity of the San Andreas fault and other active faults in the San Francisco Bav Area. As for all sites in the San )~rancisco Bav Area. the project can be expected to experience at least one moderate to severe earthquake shaking event u~tz~ nr:aR r~:r~`ITF~'1-aNll'e i r-n~~,c~ ;1 TA \ITC Tune 1, 2000 Job No. 2395.100 Page S during the lifespan of the project. According to recently released information by the Califorzzia Division of Mines and Geology (1999), at least one M6.9 earthquake will strike the San )~rancisco gay Area before 2030. Liquefaction T i~uefaction is the temporary transformation of a saturated, cohesionless soil into a viscous liquid cL.rs~g suong ground sk~aking from a major earthquake. No evidence of historic ground failure due to liquefaction on the site was identified, nor did we encounter earth materials that might be sL~sceptible to liquefaction dozing excavation of test pits and borings. Therefore, the risk of lielnefaction is believed to be very low. '- ~:;: Cracking Lurching is caused by the sudden swaying, spreading ox rolling of the ground dozing a strong earthquake. Lurching usu of shalloww sa d tonevbedroek ove~mo tf of the site suggests that lurbh weak soils. The presence erackiz~g is unlikely in the event of seismic ground shaking- Groumd Subsidence O~ot:nd subsidence can occur as a result of "shakedowxi' when dry, cohesionless soils axe subjected ;c~ ea~hqualce vibrations of high amplitude. This condition does not exist on site: therefore, ground subsdence is not considered an earthquake hazard on the property- Earthquake-Induced Lzndsliding Strong ground shaking during a major earthquake is likely to cause sympathetic reactivation of landslides iA many pants of the bay area. The stability of all slopes is lower during earthquake disturbances than. at other times. Other than the earthflow landslide i.n the south portion of the property which we understand is outside of the development area, no landslides involving bedrock zre mapped on site- In our opinion, appropriate remedial design and grading of the slope should -ec~=ce the risk of seismically induced Iandsliding to an acceptable level. LIM~TA.")iIONS The conclusions in this report are basedupon the information provided to to resarding the proposed developments, review ofpreviotis reports and geologic literature, subsurface conditions encountered in test pits; gevloaie reconnaissance, and professional judgement. This study has been conducted in accordance tivith current professional geotechnical engineering and engineering geologic standards; no other warranty is expressed or implied. design criteria for the proposed develaprxaent slior?ld be established in a design level geotechnical investigation. ,y^,.C~A~ GEOTECHNIGAL CONSULTANTS Juzze 1, ?000 Job No. 2395.100 Page 9 The locations of test pits were determined by pacing from established cultural features and other po~-:ts of reference and are to be considered approxiuzate only. Site conditions described in the text ~;. tc.ose existing at the tinne of our last field exploration and reconnaissance, and are not necessarily representative of such conditions at other locations and times_ If it is found during future investigations or construction that subsurface conditions differ from those described in our test pits. the conclusions and recommendations iz1 thzs report shall be considered invalid, unless the chances axe reviewed and the conclusions and recommendations modified or a~rcved in writing. Resrectfully ~ER.L Senior E C,~EG. 1264 /J , ~~` JCE 20383, xp. 9i30i0 i ~' VI`Lil=$:trtc\pv OTG~C c A~ Geologist C> ~ ~! if q~ ~ n~c ~,,, ~ ~~;~~ c:n ~~~~ ~ ' . . ~. . , r . 1, •~ f r , , ° te •• t . ! I f , : ~ ll\ _ J T ~:• f: ~ 1 ~ / l /~ `` . Attachments: ~ ~;~ r~ ~~'~-C~~~.~ Report References ~,-~.;.:.: -~'° Literature References Plate I -Vicinity ivlap Plate 2 -Site Plan Plate 3 -Geologic Cross-Sections Appendix CoA ies: Addressee (b) ~~~o~tzro~Y,9isa ~LniG~AR GEOTEiHN1CAL CGN5UL7ANTS Via Facsimile and Mail BERLOGAR October 1, 2001 GEOTECHNICAL lob No. 2395.101 CONSULTANTS Ms Carol Anne Painter Duc Housing Partners, Inc. 1107 Winchester Boulevard. Suite H Los Gatos. California 95032 Subject: :addendum Pretiminar~~ Geotechnical Investi~~ation Gellert Propert~~ Gellert Boulevard South San 1 rancisco, California Dear tits Painter: INTRODUCTION Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants (BGC) has previouslti performed a preliminarv geotechnical investigation report of the Gellert Propert}~ located on Gellert Boulevard in South San Francisco, California.. dated June 1, 2000. At the time the report was written. the proposed grading for t11e site was intended to accommodate 7=I single-famil~~ residences. We have recentl.v received a plan for the subject site prepared by Wilsey Ham. titled `'l~Iarbella. Vesting Tentative ~1ap for Condominium Purposes, Revised August 10. 2001 ". This letter is an addendum to our previous report to address the suitability ofthe subject site for the currently proposed development. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT "rhe proposed developnlcnt includes sip, tour-story coudominiunls over two levels of parking garage. A portion of the lower parking garage is located below design finish grade. Tiered retaining walls in 10 foot vertical increments up to a combined height of 40 feet are planned along the western limits of the proposed development. The proposed grading will also include retaining walls up to approximate 5 feet in height along the east portion of the site. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed development of the site appears feasible provided the recommendations contained in this letter and our report dated June 1, 2000 are incorporated into the design of the project. Detailed design criteria for the proposed development should be established in a design-level geotechnical investigation. Our preliminarv conclusions and recommendations are presented below. FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS The foundation conditions for Building A will be engineered fill to considerable thickness on the south and cut bedrock on the north. The foundation conditions for Buildings B through F will consist of bedrock cut on the west side and shallow fill on the east side. It is our judgement that Buildings B jOL LA(.iAFl-~~~ ,_`.1 '\i`_i~:A(, ~ii Ni)t ~~`lti . :,~~ ~ ,. 'r ._ e _. AAA`. A. 1`~-J ,i~(> `~'- n' __ • i AV `~' ~i-11,-~~{~~, October 1, 2001 Job No. 239.101 Page 2 through F can be founded on shallow foundations bearing on bedrock or thin engineered fills. We anticipate that the southern portion of Building A will likely need deep foundations extending to bedrock. BUILDING RETAINING WALLS The proposed buildings will have two levels of partially submerged parlcin;~ under the four-stories of dwellin~~r units. This will result in basement retainin« walls up to nearly 20 feet in height. We anticipate that these wall can be desi~~ned and constructed utilising common design and construction procedures. These walls and the lower ~aarage 11oor will reduire extensive drainage measures given the shallow ground ~~ titer on this site. ~~~ e expect that the drainage measures will, at a mininnim. include complete bacl:drainage behind the walls and a draina~~e blanket underneath the lower garage floors. We recommend that the tiered retaining walls along the westenl limits of the proposed development be designed and constructed as soil nail and shotcrete walls. This type of wall has the advantage of 1) not requirin~a the use of temporary oversteepened baclccuts necessary fvr most other types of walls, and 2) the soil nails help to reinforce the slope in which they are anchored. Given the shallow ground water on this site, the walls will need to incorporate extensive baclcdrainage using a geocomposite such as Miradrain. LIiy~IITATIONS "I'he conclusions and recommendations ofthis addendum letter are based on the information provided to us regarding the subject project, our previous investigation, and professional judgement. The professional opinions derived are in accordance with the current standards of engineering geologic and geotechnical practice; no other warranty is expressed or implied. Respectfully submitted, BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ober Boe Project Geologist RB/FB:pv r nk Berlo ar CE 20383, xp Copies: Addressee (6) City of South San Francisco, Planning Department (3) Attention: Ms Allison Knapp City of South San Francisco, Engineering Department (1) Attention: Mr. Richard Harmon wp9/letter/ 11020 v Quo ~ Ess,D~~ ~~~ ~~ r~~~~ ~ o ~ ~ 2 c~ ~ 9y ~' w ~ i `f%~ ~ ~ BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Via Facsimile and Mail BERLOGAR October 1, 2001 GEOTECHNICAL Job No. 2395.101 CONSULTANTS Ms Carol Anne Painter Duc Housing Partners, Inc. 1107 Winchester Boulevard. Suite H Los Gatos. California 93032 Subject: Addendum Preliminary Geot~chnical Investigation Gellert Property Gellert Boulevard South San Francisco, California Dear Ms Painter: INTRODUCTION Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants (BCC) has previously perfonlled a preliminary geotechnical investi~~ation report of the Gellert Property located on Gellert Boulevard in South San Francisco. California. dated June 1, 2000. At the time the report was written, the proposed grading for the site was intended to accommodate 74 sin,le-family residences. We have recently received a plan for the subject site prepared by Wilsey Ham, titled "Marbella, Vesting Tentative Map for Condominium Purpose, Revised August 10, 2001". This letter is an addendum to our previous report to address the suitability of the subject site for the currently proposed development. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development includes six, lour-story condominiums over two levels ofparking garage. A portion of the lower parking garage is located below design finish ;ride. Tiered retaining walls in 10 foot vertical increments up to a combined height of 40 feet are planned along the western limits of the proposed development. The proposed grading will also include retaining walls up to approximate 5 feet in height along the east portion of the site. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed development of the site appears feasible provided the recommendations contained in this letter and our report dated June 1, 2000 are incorporated into the design of the project. Detailed design criteria for the proposed development should be established in a design-level geotechnical investigation. Our preliminary conclusions and recommendations are presented below. FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS The foundation conditions for Building A will be engineered fill to considerable thickness on the south and cut bedrock on the north. The foundation conditions for Buildings B through F will consist of bedrock cut on the west side and shallow fill on the east side. It is our judgement that Buildings B jOli_~A(,I.ACf.iZ~ ~~~(~,('-R;Ai, .,r~iii,(,i~:_ ~~~~ ~l `~~~I_ l ~..Ai~;) V`.\.Ai(~V i._~~'~-l~hi~ .~i- __. ~A\_ `~' ~,:(~-`)6-4~ October 1, 2001 Job No. 2395.101 Page 2 through F can be founded on shallow foundations bearing on bedrock or thin engineered fills. We anticipate that the southern portion of Building A will likely need deep foundations extending to bedrock. BUILDING RETAINING WALLS The proposed buildings wil l have two levels of partially submerged parking under the four-stories of dwellin~z units. This will result in basement retaining walls up to nearly 20 feet in height. We anticipate that these wall can be desi~sned and constructed utilizing common design and construction ~~rocedures. These walls and ~ ° lo~~~er gara~~e floor ~~~ill require extensive draina~~e measures~iven the shallow ~~round water on tics site. We expect that the drainage measures will, at a minim>.un, include cumplete backdraina~~e behind the ~~-alls and a draina~~e blanket w~derneath the lo~ti~er ~rara~ae floors. We recommend that the tiered retaining walls along the western limits ofthe proposed development be designed and constructed as soil nail and shotcrete walls. This type of wall has the advantage of 1) not requiring the use of temporary oversteepened backcuts necessary for most other types of walls, and 2) the soil nails help to reinforce the slope in which they are anchored. Given the shallow ground water on this site, the walls will need to incorporate extensive backdrainage t,ising a geocomposite such as ~Iiradrain. LIl~1ITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations ofthis addendum letter are based ou the information provided to us regardin~~ the subject project, our previous investigation, and professional judgement. The professional opinions derived are in accordance with the current standards of en~rineerin~~ geolo~~ic and veotechnical practice: no other warranty is expressed or implied. Respectfully submitted, BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS obe Boe~ r nlc Berlo Project Geologist CE 20383, RB/FB:pv Copies: Addressee (6) City of South San Francisco, Planning Department (3) Attention: Ms Allison Knapp City of South San Francisco, Engineering Department (1) Attention: Mr. Richard Harmon wp9/letter/ 1 1020 Q~pF ESSI p~ygl ~o~~,~.~ ~~P,~a~~F~~ ~ ~ `'~ "'i' m ~`~l,~l C I V ~~' O~a~Q F O F C A~~~ BERLOGAR GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS