HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Minutes 2008-09-24MI UTE S
N
J ~ lea SPECIAL MEETING
'ILIFOR~
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Meeting held at:
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2008
CALL TO ORDER: 6:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: 13oardmembers Addiego and Mullin, Vice Chairwoman
Matsumoto and Chairman Gonzalez.
Absent: 13oardmembcr Garbarino.
1. Public Comments -comments were limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda.
None.
2. Resolution No. 20-2008 approving the execution of an Owner Participation. and Loan
Agreement with MP South City L.P., approving the provision of a loan for the acquisition
and development of a mixed-use affordable housing project at 636 El Camino Real,
adopting findings that such financing will be of benefit to the El Camino Corridor
Redevelopment Project Area, authorizing the execution of documents in connection with
such financing, and approving an amendment to the Agency Low/Mod Housing
Operating Budget.
Redevelopment Consultant Sanchez presented the staff report recommending approval of a loan
for the development of an affordable housing project at 636 El Camino Real. The proposed loan
would fund acquisition and pedevelopment expenses. Pursuant to the agreement, Mid-Peninsula
Housing would be required to give preference to residents who live or work in South San
Francisco. He further advised that Mid-Peninsula staff members were present and available to
answer any of the Agency's questions. He recommended approval of the resolution subject to
final approval of the agreement by the City Attorney.
Chairman Gonzalez recognized members of the public for comment on the item.
Superintendent of the South San Francisco Unified School District Barbara Olds appeared to
express the School District's concerns regarding the proposal and advised the District had just
recently been notified the project would be moving forward. The District's concerns centered on
the project's potential to impact the educational programs in place at South San Francisco High
School and Los Cerritos Elementary, both of which were in close proximity to the proposed
development. She opined the relationship between income levels and No Child Left Behind
might affect students at these schools. The District's additional concerns related to the impact of
the development on traffic and parking near South San Francisco High School. Superintendant
Olds was pleased that employees of the School District would potentially qualify to reside at the
development. She requested that the School District be consulted and included as part of a
collaborative effort moving forward on the project.
Resident Pradeep Gupta stated that for most of the year he had been attending conferences related
to the lack of affordable housing in our area. He expressed concern that the lack of such housing
impacts essential elements of our community. He applauded the proactive direction the City had
taken with respect to affordable housing and encouraged support for this project. Mr. Gupta
opined the development presented an opportunity to create a template for projects on the El
Camino Real, including such elements as design, facade and space requirements. He then briefly
addressed the issues raised by the School District and stated the development had the potential to
create opportunity for students of all income levels and might even reduce traffic given that its
location was within walking distance of the schools.
Resident Elizabeth Rosa advised she had lived at 636 El Camino Real for 14 years. The
possibility of a new development on the property caught current residents by surprise. She
expressed concern over the development's impact on her rent.
Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto advised Ms. Rosa she should not leave the meeting with anxiety.
She explained state law protects the rights of current residents at 636 El Camino Real and noted
the residents would not be left out in the cold. She asked Ms. Rosa to speak with Redevelopment
Consultant Sanchez who would be able to provide more information about the process.
Resident Erica, also of 636 El Camino Real, stated she was pleased that a new development was
planned for the property but expressed concern over what would happen to herself and others
currently in residence. She stated that Boardmembers' previous comments had addressed her
concerns.
Boardmember Addiego questioned whether Erica would be comfortable sharing her current rent.
Erica stated her rent was currently around $650.00/month.
Resident Chris Moore explained that throughout the state, Mid-Peninsula had an excellent
reputation for providing very affordable housing, including onsite services such as after school
programs and computer rooms. Mr. Moore further stated the development would provide good
prevailing wage jobs during construction. A higher density design at the site would be in
keeping with the Grand Boulevard vision. In addition, marketing the development to South San
Francisco residents would provide families with children already enrolled in South San Francisco
Schools with a better place to live and might yield more disposable income for such residents.
Matthew O. Franklin, Executive Director of Mid Peninsula Housing Coalition appeared and
acknowledged the School District's concerns and noted such concerns were taken seriously. He
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 2
stated Mid-Peninsula's intent to collaborate with the City and School District and any and all
local partners to aggressively pursue South San Francisco residents. Thus, he opined many of the
children who would reside at the property would already be enrolled in South San Francisco
Schools. Mid-Peninsula's developments generally include computer labs, community rooms and
meeting space. Anticipated family development programs would incorporate a focus on
children's education, after school mentoring and homework clubs. He acknowledged traffic was
a concern, and noted a professional would be hired to perform a traffic study during the land use
process. He observed a solution to traffic concerns would be to create the primary entrance to the
property off of El Camino Real as opposed to B Street. Mr. Franklin further noted that
qualifying income levels for a family of four at Mid-Peninsula properties is generally in the range
of 30-60% of average median income. Accordingly, the majority of the residents would be
employed and working. Based upon these numbers, a variety of integral community members,
including employees of the City anal School District would benefit from the housing. He closed
by noting the existence of very clear state relocation guidelines governing the rights of current
residents on the property.
Boardmember Mullin questioned whether onsite childcare was offered at any of Mid-Peninsula's
developments.
Mr. Franklin advised onsite childcare existed at many of the developments in collaboration with
Head Start and noted such childcare was a very regular component ofMid-Peninsula's family
housing developments.
Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto stated she sits on the Housing Committee, which fully supported
the proposed development. She opined the proposal was consistent with the Grand Boulevard
initiative and the City's direction. She also noted that low income does not equate to children
that are slow learners. She expressed a preference for placement of current South San Francisco
residents in the development and questioned the composition of the limited partnership.
Mr. Franklin responded it was very common for real estate developers to form a limited
partnership to serve as a stand alone legal entity on a development specific basis such that each
project stands alone. He noted the limited partnership was essentially Mid-Peninsula, he was the
President and there were no other members.
Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto observed the Agency was being requested to increase its loan by
$500,000.00. She questioned whether the Agency would be able to utilize certain funds from
Genentech towards this purpose.
Redevelopment Consultant Sanchez advised staff intended to seek use of such funds. He noted
that whether applied to pedevelopment or later expenses, it maybe necessary to go to HEART
for funding.
Councilman Addiego stated the project was consistent with the City's vision for development on
El Camino Real. He questioned whether Mid-Peninsula's limited partnership would expect to
eventually roll out of the project. He further questioned what would happen after expiration of
the 15 year period during which management and development fees were due. He also
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 3
questioned the likelihood the 55 year term would satisfy the note.
Mr. Franklin responded Mid-Peninsula intended to serve as the long time sole owner and
manager of the project. At the 15 year point, Mid-Peninsula would likely buy-out the limited
partner, which was contemplated on the front end in the partnership agreement. He noted the
ultimate objective was to develop quality, affordable housing in perpetuity. Regarding the 55
year term, he opined it was unlikely to satisfy the entirety of the note.
Prior to adoption of the Motion, Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto stated the caveat that the Agency
would work with HEART to secure funding for this project.
Motion-Boardmember Addiego/Second -Boardmember Mullin: to adopt Resolution No. 20-
2008 and provide the City Attorney final authority to improve insurance provisions as to form.
AYES: Boardmembers Addiego and Mullin, Vice Chairwoman Matsumoto and Chairman
Gonzalez. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilman Garbarino.
3 . Adjournment.
Being no further business, Chairman Gonzalez adjourned the meeting at 7:17 p.m.
Submitted by:
• ...
Krista Martlnell' arson, Clerk
City of Soutli Francisco
Approved by:
~~
~,~~ ~
L
Pedro Gonz~~lez, Chairnla~i~
City of South San Francisco
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 24, 2008
PAGE 4