Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-10-19MINUTES October Z9, 2006 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION TAPE 1 CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7:30 n.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioner Giusti, ,Commissioner Romero, Commissioner Sim, Commissioner Teglia, Vice Chairperson Honan and Chairperson Zemke ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Commissioner Prouty Planning Division: City Attorney: Engineering Division Fire Prevention. Susy Kalkin, Chief Planner Steve Carlson, Senior Planner Mike Lappen, Senior Planner Girard Beaudin, Associate Planner Bertha Aguilar, Admin. Asst. II Peter Spoerl, Assistant City Attorney Sam Bautista, Senior Civil Engineer Bryan Niswonger, Assistant Fire Marshal CHAIR COMMENTS AGENDA REVIEW Chief Planner Kalkin requested that East Jamie Court would be moved to the Consent Calendar with a recommendation to continue off calendar. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None CONSENT CALENDAR None 1. Approval of Regular meeting minutes of August 3`d, August 17t" and Special meeting minutes of September 7, 2006. 2. Diana Barnard/applicant KSW PROPERTIES/owner 1333-1361 Lowrie Ave (015-115-290 & 015-115-460) P05-0139: UP05-0027, DR06-0027, VAR05-0002 ~ TDM05-0005 (Continue off calendar) Use Permit allowing re-establishment of warehouse and distribution uses generating in excess of 100 average daily vehicle trips, outdoor overnight truck storage and 24 hour operation and Design Review of landscaping upgrades; Cultural Arts Contribution allowing 16,590 square feet of on-site landscaping in-lieu of providing a minimum landscaping of 26,236 square feet; Variance allowing 95 parking spaces instead of the minimum requirement of 125 parking spaces and Transportation Demand Management Plan in association with a Variance reducing parking requirements located at 1331, 1341-1349 Lowrie Avenue in the Planned Industrial Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.30, 20.81, 20.84, 20.85, 20.101, & 20.120. Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 6. Alexandria Real Estate Equitieslapplicant Richard Elmo Haskins/owner Southeast corner of East Jamie Court and Haskins Way P02-0042: UPM06-0003, DAA06-0002, TDM06-0007 and Addendum to certified Mitigated Negative Declaration MND02-0042 (Continued off calendar) Use Permit Modification, Modified TDM Plan and Design Review of minor changes to an approved two building office/R&D complex on a 6.13-acre site at the southeast corner of East Jamie Court and Haskins Way, adjacent to the San Francisco Bay. The approved project consists of two buildings totaling 133,000 sq. ft.: one two-story structure over a parking level (57,700 sq. ft.) and one three- story structure (75,300 sq. ft.), with a parking ratio of 2.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The revised project consists of two three-story buildings of the same layout and design of the original plan, but totaling 162,000 sq. ft. (29,000 sq. ft. increase) over a depressed parking level extending beneath both buildings, and providing a parking ratio of 2.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet, in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.32, 20.74, 20.85, 20.91 and 20.120. Modification to approved Development Agreement. Motion Giusti /Second Sim to approve the consent calendar. Approved by majority voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -Absent PUBLIC HEARING 3. Use Permit - NCLEX PS Business Parks/Owner Elieen A. DeDios/Applicant 90 So. Spruce P06-0096: UP06-0024 (Continued from September 7, 2006) Use Permit to allow a Joint Use parking arrangement at 90 So. Spruce Avenue so that a nursing education exam review center can use 18 spaces during off-peak hours (5pm to 9pm Monday through Friday) in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.32, 20.74, 20.74.080(b) in the P-I (Planned Industrial) Zoning District. Public Hearing opened. Associate Planner Beaudin presented the staff report. The applicant stated that he was available to answer any questions the Commission might have. Chairperson Zemke asked what the teaching hours were. The applicant replied that the classes were normally from 5:00 p.m, to 9:00 p.m. Commissioner Giusti questioned how many people they will enroll. The applicant noted that they will have 9 to 10 students a month. Public Hearing closed. Motion Honan /Second Teglia to approve P06-0096: UP06-0024. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -Absent s:~Nt%wutPS\~%wal~zed M%N.utes\2oo6~.o-ry-o6 R.pc Miwutes.doc page 2 o-f_9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 Items 4 and 5 heard s/mu/taneous/v 4. Federal Express Distribution Facility Michael Nilmeyer/applicant A-M-J ASSOCIATES/owner 222 Littlefield Ave P06-0056: UP06-0017, DRO6-0044 & TDM06-0005 (Continued from September 21, 2006) Use Permit to legalize a commercial postal facility with 24 hour daily operations and generating in excess of 100 average daily vehicle trips, and off-site parking at 202 Littlefield Avenue; Design Review of a new open at-grade parking lot and landscaping upgrades; Transportation Demand Management Plan to reduce traffic associated with the development located in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.32, 20.74, 20.81, 20.85 & 20.120. 5. Federal Express Indoor Garage /Distribution Facility Michael Nilmeyer/applicant WELLS ENTERPRISES/owner 202, 212 8- 218 Littlefield Ave P06-0054: UPO6-0016, DR06-0043 & TDM06-0004 (Continued from September 21, 2006) Use Permit and Design Review allowing a two tenant building comprised of a 10,228 square foot industrial use and a 17,600 square foot commercial mail distribution center with a 32,000 square foot indoor garage for occupants of 202 and 222 Littlefield Avenue, outdoor parking for twenty-five (25) vehicles and indoor parking garage for up to eighty-two (82) vehicles, outdoor overnight storage of up to five (5) tractor trailers, and three (30 foot long loading docks, generating in excess of one hundred (100) average daily vehicle trips, and twenty-four (24) hour operation; Transportation Demand Management Plan to reduce traffic associated with the development in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.71, 20.74, 20.81 & 20.85 & 20.120. Public Hearings opened. Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report and gave a PowerPoint presentation. He added that the Fire Department has removed Condition of Approval #2 and will they will be revised. Assistant City Attorney Spoerl noted that the applicant is willing to pay the business licenses retroactively. He pointed out that the applicant has requested that the conditions be revised to reflect "individual contractor's" rather than "contract employees". Pat Esquino, Federal Express representative, presented their Counsel, Michael McCracken. He added that they will retroactively pay the business licenses for the 220 Shaw facility since it opened last year and the Littlefield facility for the last 3 years. He added that the applications will be submitted with the fees the next business day. Michael Nilmeyer gave a presentation of the project. Commissioner Sim asked for more detail in the BCDC area. Mr. Nilmeyer noted that the BCDC trail meets the public right-of-way and noted that there will be a 30 inch landscape strip. Commissioner Giusti asked if the building would be painted. Mr. Nilmeyer replied that 222 Littlefield will be repainted, but not 202 Littlefield. Senior Planner Carlson noted that Condition of Approval #3 requires that the applicant have a painting program subject to the approval of the Chief Planner. s:\M%v~.utes\~i.wctl%zed MCwutes\2oo6\io-i9-o6 Rpc rn~wutes.doc page s of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 Chairperson Zemke noted that the landscaping will need to be protected to prevent trucks running over it. Mr. Nilmeyer noted that there will be concrete curbs that separate the trailers from the landscaping. Senior Planner Carlson added that they are obligated to maintain their landscaping per the Standard Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Romero asked if the parking for the trucks is for 30 foot trucks only. Mr. Nilmeyer noted that the larger trucks would be limited to outside the building. Commissioner Teglia noted that the parking spaces lengths vary from 25 feet up to 42 feet. Mr. Nilmeyer noted that the shorter space is a tractor space and the larger ones are 42 feet. Commissioner Giusti questioned how the trucks will be loaded. Mr. Nilmeyer replied that the drivers will pick up the parcels, sort them within the facility and delivered to their locations or the airport. Pamela Duffy of Coblentz, Patch, Duffy and Bass Law Firm noted that she was representing the owners of 360 Harbor Way. She noted her concern with the 20 foot access, with the number of trips per day, and the effects on neighboring properties. Additionally, she was unclear on what the BCDC permit modifications would be as a result of this process. She pointed out that they were also unclear on the CEQA determination for this project. She felt that the issues can be worked out through a cooperation agreement with both property owners. She noted that they submitted a proposal to the applicant in early October but have not yet reached a signed agreement. Mike McCracken, attorney for Federal Express, stated that he has looked at the letter and Federal Express does not have any concerns with it. Public Hearing closed. Commissioner Teglia asked if a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be required. Senior Planner Carlson noted that initially due to Fire Code and traffic circulation issues staff felt that a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be needed, but the designer resolved all the issues and consequently an environmental document is no longer required. Commissioner Teglia asked if the turnaround will be striped and if the intent is that there be no blockage of that turnaround. Fire Marshal Niswonger replied affirmatively and added that no parking will be allowed in the fire lane. He stated that the Police Department can enforce this red lane through the Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Teglia asked if there was a Condition of Approval requiring that all vehicles be contained onsite. Senior Planner Carlson noted that the Commission can add this to the conditions. Commissioner Teglia asked what the standard trailer size at the site would be and if they would be doubles. Mr. Esquino noted that the fleet is predominantly 28 foot trailers and some are 45 footers, but he did not have an answer with regard to the doubles. Commissioner Teglia noted his concerned that there were no lanes for doubles arrivals and any doubles would either block the unload area or drop on the street. He noted that there is an opportunity to reconfigure the back end of the lot to have a pull through. He noted that trailers cannot be parked on the street. Commissioner Teglia asked for the distance from the back curb to the hammerhead. Mr. Esquino stated that it is typically a 50 foot space. Commissioner Teglia noted that a set is about 80 feet and was concerned that the set would be in the fire lane. Mr. Esquino stated that long trailer would not be hooked in a double configuration and the short trailers can be hooked up as doubles without going into the fire lane. Commissioner Teglia noted that fire access to the site will be blocked in an emergency situation. He asked for a clarification on how doubles will be handled on site or that singles will be the only types allowed on the site. Commissioner Romero questioned if the vans operating out of the facility will be company owned or independent contractors and how they are controlled. Mr. Esquino noted that the independent could own or lease the vehicle. Commissioner Romero asked who would be responsible for maintenance of the vehicles. Mr. Esquino replied that the contractors are responsible for their own vehicles and stated that they don't permit these activities on-site. Senior Planner Carlson noted the Commission can add another condition of approval to make it clear that these items are not allowed onsite. Commissioner Romero noted that this should be added. Mr. Esquino stated that there was no objection to that. s:\M%N.utes\~%walCzed r~Cwutes\2oo~\io-i9-o~ rzpc M%v~,utes.doc Page ~ of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 Commissioner Teglia asked if someone becomes a contractor mid-year, will Fed-Ex require them to have all the proper operating permits as a condition to being onsite. He asked to see language speaking to the effect that the landlord needs to make sure that all tenants are in compliance with the law and that at all times all contractor's should have a valid business license. Senior Planner Carlson asked if the Commission would like to add a one year review on the Use Permit. Commissioner Teglia, Chairperson Zemke and other Commissioners agreed that it would be a good idea to add a one year review. Mr. McCracken asked if the condition was changed to reflect independent contractors rather than employees Vice Chairperson Honan stated that the double stacked trailers will block the fire lane. Senior Planner Carlson replied this is true if they use the area previously discussed, unless the hammerhead area is shortened. He added that the fire lane can be reconfigured and returned to the Commission. Vice Chairperson Honan noted that a resolution is needed prior to taking action on the item. Mr. Nilmeyer stated that the hammerhead can be reconfigured to allow more space but it depends on the Fire Marshal's review and approval. Commissioner Teglia added that there should be designated spots for hooking up doubles and breaking them up. Fire Marshal Niswonger noted that the hammerhead can be moved down and can accommodate a specified area for double hook up. He noted that there can be a condition to designate the area and will go back to monitor it prior to the Commission's annual review. Vice Chairperson Honan asked how many lanes are needed for doubles and are there enough. Mr. Esquino noted that he does not have the specifics as to how many are coming to the site. He stated that they will manage their operation to phase the doubles in appropriately to adequately take them down or build them without violating the fire lanes. Senior Planner Carlson pointed out that the maximum is 3 or 6 designated areas and could modify or add a condition that there will be a designated setup area for the doubles subject to the Fire Marshal's review and approval. Commissioner Teglia asked that if the business licenses' Conditions of Approval could include language that the landlord is responsible to make sure the independent contractors are in compliance with City requirements. Assistant City Attorney Spoerl stated that he would work with the applicant to draft a revised condition to reflect that. Motion for 222 Littlefield Motion Teglia /Second Sim to approve P06-0056: UP06-0017, DR06-0044 & TDM06-0005 with the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: • Revised business license condition return to the Commission for approval. • 6 month review of the Use Permit. • Designated plan identifying proper ingress and egress of double stacked trailers be delineated. • No onsite servicing or washing of vehicles. • No parking or staging on the street. • Revision of Condition #6 should be revised to reflect 24 trucks rather than 29 trucks being allowed to park on site without violating any of the fire lanes. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -Absent Motion for 202 Littlefield Motion Teglia /Second Romero to approve P06-0054: UP06-0016, DR06-0043 & TDM06-0004 with the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval: • Revised business license condition return to the Commission for approval. • 6 month review of the Use Permit. • Designated plan identifying proper ingress and egress of double stacked trailers be delineated. • No onsite servicing or washing of vehicles. • No parking or staging on the street. s:\M%wutes\F%wal%zed M%wutes\2oo6\2o-i9-o6 RpC M%wutes.doc Page s of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 Revision of Condition #6 should be revised to reflect 24 trucks rather than 29 trucks being allowed to park on site without violating any of the fire lanes. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -Absent 6. Alexandria Real Estate Equities/applicant Richard Elmo Haskins/owner Southeast corner of East Jamie Court and Haskins Way P02-0042: UPMO6-0003, DAA06-0002, TDM06-0007 and Addendum to certified Mitigated Negative Declaration MND02-0042 (Continued from October 6, 2006) Use Permit Modification, Modified TDM Plan and Design Review of minor changes to an approved two building office/R&D complex on a 6.13-acre site at the southeast corner of East Jamie Court and Haskins Way, adjacent to the San Francisco Bay. The approved project consists of two buildings totaling 133,000 sq. ft.: one two-story structure over a parking level (57,700 sq. ft.) and one three- story structure (75,300 sq. ft.), with a parking ratio of 2.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The revised project consists of two three-story buildings of the same layout and design of the original plan, but totaling 162,000 sq. ft. (29,000 sq. ft. increase) over a depressed parking level extending beneath both buildings, and providing a parking ratio of 2.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet, in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.32, 20.74, 20.85, 20.91 and 20.120. Modification to approved Development Agreement. Item # 6 moved to Consent Ca/endar under agenda review, ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 7. FedEx Distribution Center Bacon, John W. & Lynn J./Owner Michael Nilmeyer/Applicant 220 Shaw Road P05-0064: UP05-0014 (Continued from September 21, 2006) Use Permit and Design Review allowing the conversion of a two-story 65,694 square foot industrial building into commercial postal facility with exterior building improvements, landscaping upgrades and open at-grade parking accommodating up to 66 parking spaces, loading spaces and 9 truck trailer parking spaces, generating in excess of 100 average daily Senior Planner Carlson noted that the review required landscaping and this has been fulfilled. He added that the business license issue has been addressed in the previous public hearing and if the Commission wishes to add a condition, the item will need to be noticed for a public hearing to be held at the next meeting. Commissioner Romero asked if there was a list available of the independent contractors and where they live. Senior Planner Carlson noted that copies of the business licenses will be copied for the Commission if they wish. Commissioner Romero stated that he would like to see this information to determine how it is affecting the neighbors. Senior Planner Carlson pointed out that in reviewing the preliminary submittal there were two or three of these contractors who lived in South San Francisco. Commissioner Teglia stated that this was not a requirement at the time because they were independent contractors and asked if there were any contractors using the facility to park their van there. He stated that a review of the tractor trailer drivers should be included in the business license review, especially if they reside in s:\n~Lwutes\~%wal%zed r~Cwutes\.2oo6\io-iy-o6 R.pc MCv~.utes.doc gage ~ of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 South San Francisco. Recess called at 8:52 8. Study Session Genentech Master Plan Genentech /Owner Lisa Sullivan/Applicant 1 DNA Way P05-0141: MP05-0001 ~ EIR05-0004 Genentech Facilities Master Plan Update Study Session #4. Senior Planner Lappen gave a brief overview on the status of the Master Plan.' Recalled to order at 9:02 p.m. Lisa Sullivan, Director of Strategic Facilities Planning, gave a presentation covering Genentech's traffic impact on the region, modification of public streets within the campus, shuttle shelters and design guidelines. Matt Haynes, Fehr & Peers, Genentech Traffic Consultant, noted that there is underutilized access off US 101to the site off of South Airport Boulevard and this will help minimize the impact on Oyster Point Boulevard and East Grand Avenue. He added that a new flyover has been suggested but will need to be looked into in more detail and will need to be reviewed by CalTrans. Commissioner Teglia noted that this EIR identifies the impacts and could be used as justification to start looking into the flyover concept. He questioned if the flyover could alleviate afternoon peak hour traffic on Oyster Point Boulevard. Mr. Haynes noted that there is a large amount of traffic through Oyster Point Boulevard. He noted that one of the design issues is that there are three close intersections that cause operational issues. Commissioner Teglia noted that there is merit to start the process on the flyover. Mr. Haynes noted that a flyover process could be started with a CalTrans project study report. Ms. Sullivan and Mr. Haynes continued with the presentation related to shuttle stops and Forbes Boulevard bike lanes and adding lanes. Commissioner Teglia noted his concern with removing the median on Forbes but suggested there could be some opportunities to narrow it. He noted that removing the median would require a redesign of the area and at the moment it serves as a buffer for large trucks. He added that the pedestrian traffic is a concern for the Commission and was pleased to see that a dedicated pedestrian light was being proposed. Shutt/e stows Ms. Sullivan stated that the Design Review Board did not like the proposed shuttle shelters and showed pictures of the shuttle shelters they are proposing. She asked the Commission for direction as to the look of the shelters and if signs could be placed in the shelters. Commissioner Teglia noted that Genentech could have distinctive designs with curves and glass. Commissioner Sim noted that a contemporary modern look would be better than what exists at the moment. Ms. Sullivan noted that they will work with staff to have shuttles that have a modern look. She asked the Commission for direction on allowing signs at the shuttle stops. Commissioner Romero preferred to have the signs restricted to the campus and not on public streets. He asked to see how the shuttle will work with the street, cutouts, and locations. Commissioner Teglia suggested that the design could make someone feel like they are at Genentech without the need for signs being present. Chairperson Zemke added that the rectangular look needs to be softened on the shuttle shelters to add interest to them. Commissioner Sim noted that walking on the sidewalk could be made more interesting and varied. He suggested s:\M%wutes\~Cwal.%zed nn~wutes\2oo~\io-i9-o6 R.PC rn~wutes.doc Page ~ of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 putting a tree at the edge of the buffer along the sidewalk to protect from the wind and make the person feel like they are in a campus. Design Guidelines Shar Zamanpour gave a presentation on the design guidelines for the Lower, Upper and Mid campuses. She noted that they toured other campuses in the area to get an idea of what other companies were doing with respect to design. She pointed out there will be horizontal and vertical elements; setbacks will be maintained to further soften the look and feel of the buildings; and landscaping and materials will be enhanced to blend in with the surroundings. Commissioner Teglia noted that the Oracle campus has a large greenbelt going around the Bay Trail and Genentech is lacking something like that. He pointed out that the amenities building on Forbes is an opportunity to expand on it. He stated that most of the public amenities need to be concentrated along the public Bay Trail. He added that the DNA Way and Forbes corner is not inviting and looks like someone is driving out into a private parking lot. He suggested changing the parking lot entrance to make it reflect a public entrance. Commissioner Sim added that there needs to be more balance to the outdoor open space. He noted that the spines could be both vertical and horizontal elements that merge into the campus. He stated that there are more opportunities in a large campus to create different variations of spines. He referred to the Silicon Graphics campus as an example of deconstructive design. Ms. Zamanpour noted that she will look at Silicon Graphics and pointed out the open space concept is in the details of the projects. Commissioner Sim asked if Genentech was open to using new materials. Ms. Zamanpour noted that they do explore new materials and ideas but there are some uninsurable materials they cannot use. Commissioner Sim asked about Genentech's approach to sustainable design. Ms. Zamanpour noted that the infrastructure is more effective in terms of sustainability. She pointed out that they are mindful of using recyclable and recycled material. Commissioner Romero noted that Genentech is moving in the right direction for the project. He pointed out that the lower section of DNA Way where the pedestrian walkway is should be an overpass rather than on-street crossing due to the traffic. He noted that the landscape buffer is a good idea. He stated that the topography of the site gives a great opportunity to incorporate waterfalls or a flowing river type of design. Ms. Zamanpour noted that they have looked into it and are considering water features for campus entries. She stated that the wind could cause a problem in keeping the water features clean. Chairperson Zemke asked if the banners would no longer be included in the Master Plan. Ms. Sullivan noted that they are removing them from the Master Plan and returning with a packet of each proposed location with all the details. Commissioner Romero asked if Dyett and Bhatia was preparing the Master Plan. Senior Planner Lappen replied affirmatively and added that staff has been reviewing it and providing feedback for inclusion into the Master Plan. Ms. Sullivan noted that they relate all the comments to Dyett and Bhatia for inclusion in the Master Plan to be revised. Commissioner Sim noted that the spines need to be reinforced. Ms. Sullivan noted that they will work on defining the spines. Senior Planner Lappen noted that this concludes the Study Session but added that Genentech wants to introduce Building 31 and the Childcare facility to the Commission on November 16th with the final decision to be taken after the City Council approves the Master Plan. Commissioner Teglia noted his preference to finish the Master Plan prior to reviewing the buildings. Commissioner Romero noted that a presentation could be made because the Commission would not be making any decisions until after the Master Plan is adopted. Chief Planner Kalkin noted that this would be a study session on the two buildings. s:\M%wutes\~Cwaltzed M%N.utCS\2oo6~o-i9-o6 RPC Miwutes.doc Page g of9 Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2006 The Commission agreed to have a study session on Building 31 and the Childcare Center. ITEMS FROM STAFF None ITEMS FROM COMMISSION None 9. Cancellation of Regular Planning Commission meeting of November 2, 2006 Motion Teglia /Second Giusti to cancel the November 2, 2006 meeting. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -Absent Commissioner Romero asked for an update on the Council action pertaining to the Myers Development project. Chief Planner Kalkin noted that the Council unanimously approved the project. She added that Myers Development filed an appeal on two conditions which were: 1) the fixed seating in the performing arts center and 2) the requirement to construct the Below Market Rate (BMR) units concurrent with the Certificate of Occupancy with the office building. She stated that Council overturned the Commission's decision on those and granted the appeal. Vice Chairperson Honan asked if the public would still be able to use that space. Chief Planner Kalkin stated that the operating agreement terms will be worked out between the City Council and the Developer. Commissioner Romero was concerned that the possibility of a hotel over the parking structure was brought up at the Council hearing but never mentioned to the Commission. Chief Planner Kalkin noted that it could be proposed as an alternative project if Phase II does not get built but would have to go back through the entitlement process. Commissioner Teglia asked if the condition to market the site as a hotel was left in the conditions of Approval. Chief Planner Kalkin did not recall this being added as a condition. Commissioner Teglia asked what the current requirement on the BMR units is. Chief Planner Kalkin replied that before Mr. Myers gets a Certificate of Occupancy a site has to be purchased and entitled for the units. She added that a surety bond is required to be posted for construction of the BMR units. ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC None AD70URNMENT 10:25 P.M. Motion Honan /Second Sim to adjourn. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Commissioner Prouty -absent S Kal Secret to the Planning Commission City of South San Francisco ~~ William Zemke, Chair , rson Planning Commissio ~ City of South San Francisco SK/bla s:\MCwutes\~CwAI.%zed n~Cwutes\2oo6\io-i9-o6 R.pc M~wutes.doc ~a9e9 aF9