HomeMy WebLinkAboutTechnical Appendix part 1
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
GA TEW A Y BUSINESS PARK MASTER PLAN
TECHNICAL APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP). REVISED NOP. AND
RESPONSES TO THE NOPS
APPENDIX B: GATEWAY PRECISE AND l\IASTERPLAN
APPENDIX C: AIR QUALITY DATA
APPENDIX D: TREE REPORT
APPENDIX E: HISTORIC REPORT
APPENDIX F: SOILS REPORT
APPENDIX G: NOISE DATA
APPENDIX H: TRAFFIC DATA
APPENDIX 1: WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX A
NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP), REVISED NOP, AND RESPONSES TO THE NOPS
Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report
Date:
June 16, 2008
To:
Responsible Agencies, Agencies with Jurisdiction
Agencies, Involved Federal Agencies, and
Requesting Notice
by Law, Trustee
Agencies/People
From:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of
Econornic Development
ATNN: Stephen O'Connell, Planner
315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Re:
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
The City of South San Francisco (Lead Agency) will prepare an EIR for the proposed
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project. This Notice of Preparation (NOP) is being
distributed to applicable responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties as
required by the California Environrnental Quality Act (CEQA). Comments from interested
agencies are requested as to the scope and content of the environmental information that
is pertinent to each agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed
project. The project location and development description are summarized below, An
Initial Study is not attached.
Project Location: The Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project (project) is located in
the City of South San Francisco (the City), approximately 1.5 miles north of San Francisco
International Airport (SFO) and approximately 10 rniles south of downtown San Francisco.
The project site is bounded by Oyster Point Boulevard on the north, Gateway Boulevard
on the west, a narrow band of vacant land to the east, and a hotel to the south. Local
access to the master plan area is currently provided from Oyster Point and Gateway
Boulevards and regional access is primarily provided by US 101, Figure 1 illustrates the
regional and project site location. The Project site and surrounding land uses are shown
in Figure 2.
Project Characteristics: The project consists of a Master Plan for the phased rernoval
and replacement of existing buildings on the 22,6 acre project site and construction of five
to six new office buildings and two to four parking structures. The project would most likely
be constructed in phases over 5 to 10 years, The applicant proposes to increase the
density at an FAR of 1.25, which is perrnitted in the Gateway Specific Plan. This change
:..... CAR .j....................r......J.e~ t...... .......... ;................................... :...... d'""".."...............en.;....+ the s;'e fr"t"\t"Y\ a~~r,...,vim-:ltohl ')84 nnn cf
1111/"'\ lIQII':::'IQl;::l UOII 1I1l"Ic:;a.:::.c:; III C;VC"IVtJlll llOlll1 It [IVIII I--'p......^"I<..H'-.....J..... ,'-''-''''''....,
to approxirnately 1,230,570 sf" or a net change of 946,570 sf.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 1
City of South San Francisco
June 16, 2008
Figure 3 illustrates the Gateway Business Park Master Plan layout. The new office
buildings would be situated prirnarily along Gateway Boulevard at the western border and
the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Oyster Point Boulevard, The project would
include from 2,500 to 2,800 parking spaces with the parking structures situated on the
southeastern border of the master plan area, The internal areas of the project site would
contain the Central Commons incorporating open space areas, landscaping, and
pedestrian walkways,
The project would include zoning text changes to SSFMC Chapter 20.57 and adoption of a
TDM Plan. The Master Plan includes development standards for the project site and
conceptual site planning, building frarneworks, open space network, landscape, signage
lighting, and vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation guidelines. All future Master Plan
developrnents will be subject to a separate precise plan and CEQA review as established
in SSFMC Chapter 20.39.
The Gateway Business Park Master Plan is intended to create a high-density,
conternporary, high-quality business park, This would be accornplished by a phased and
incrernental replacernent of the existing buildings with new buildings that are modern,
more energy efficient, and to better support the ongoing evolution of the life sciences
industry. The community of new buildings would be organized in a carnpus-style setting
that is pedestrian friendly, attractive, well connected, and with a variety of usable spaces.
To achieve the goals and objectives of the Master Plan, the following site planning and
organizational principles would be followed:
(a) Design new buildings that engage the public street frontage and the Central
Cornrnons open space.
(b) Design new internal buildings that receive employees and visitors as part of a
primary arrival sequence.
(c) Concentrate parking into parking structures situation along the southeastern
boundary of the project site.
(d) Develop a pedestrian-friendly Central Commons open space in the area created
by the parking structure and the building placement strategy,
(e) Enhance public street frontage and foster transit use by providing multiple
pedestrian connections to and from the internal campus and shuttle system stops.
(f) Create an inviting and enriched arrival experience to the primary "corporate
landing" between the internal buildings and to other possible arrival areas within
the campus,
(g) Provide an appropriate landscape edge to the parking structure as it relates to the
Central Comrnons.
Planning Background: The project site is designated as Business Commercial in the
City of South San Francisco General Plan (General Plan), which was adopted in 1999.
The project site is located within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, which was adopted
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 2
City of South San Francisco
June 16, 2008
by the City in 1994. The land use plan within the East of 101 Area Plan designates the
majority of the East of 101 Area as Planned Industrial. Land use policies and designations
of the General Plan supersede those outlined in the East of 101 Area Plan. The East of
101 Area Plan will need to be updated to become consistent with the General Plan but this
action is not part of the proposed project.
Within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, the project is located in Gateway Specific Plan
Redevelopment District zoning. The Gateway Specific Plan was adopted prior to adoption
of the 1999 South San Francisco General Plan. The Specific Plan serves to refine and to
implement the General Plan with respect to the specific plan area and to combine the
concepts, procedures, and regulations of the General Plan, redevelopment plan, zoning
ordinance, and certain aspects of the subdivision ordinance. The zoning regulations for
this district have been incorporated into the City's municipal code as set forth in Sections
20.57.060 through 20.57.670. Although the General Plan permits up to an FAR of 1.0, the
Gateway Specific Plan allows an FAR of 1.25 on the site. All regulations in the municipal
code relating to the master plan area shall govern its development unless otherwise
indicated in the proposed master plan. The Gateway Master Plan area is classified as
Research & Development and Office for the purposes of determining parking
requirements.
EIR Sections: Based on the project description and the Lead Agency's understanding of
the environmental issues associated with the project, the following topics will be analyzed
in detail in the EIR:
.
Aesthetics
Air Quality
. Biological Resources
. Cultural Resources
. Geology and Soils
. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
. Hydrology and Water Quality
. Land Use/Planning
Noise
. Population/Housing
. Public Services and Recreation
. Transportation/Traffic
. Utilities
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 3
City of South San Francisco
June 16, 2008
Alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR will be defined based on their potential to reduce or
eliminate significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The
specific alternatives to be evaluated in the EIR may include, but are not limited to, the "No
Project" alternative as required by CEQA and a reduced development alternative.
NOP Notice: The Lead Agency solicits comments regarding the scope and content of the
EIR from all interested parties requesting notice, responsible agencies, agencies with
jurisdiction by law, trustee agencies, and involved agencies. In accordance with the time
limits established by CEQA, please send your response at the earliest possible date, but
no later than thirty days after receipt of this notice.
Please send your written/typed comments (including a name, telephone number, and
contact information) to the following:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of Economic
Development
ATNN: Stephen O'Connell, Planner
P.O. Box 711, South San Francisco, CA 94083
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Or via email to:stephen.o.connell@ssf.net.
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS ON
THE SCOPE OF THE EIR TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED
IN THE EIR.
For additional information, please contact Stephen O'Connell at (650) 877-8535.
~/.f /'
/ /7 ff=
./ ~ ,/'
?/ {L../ ;- ___
Michael Lappen
Economic Development Coordinator
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 4
.....
.....
...........
\'~ ........:.
.".
....... ~ ......
, ''1'
.
f
1~'
(T~
.
~
!
" \l'
.~ QM ~
".t>"fIQ),
~ 1
.
~
.
\.
~
- "
,.~ --
~ ~
,~ S
.~ .':~~..:"
'" ., t.. ...._
<.. .'..... '""
.~ .-.'t.." 3i
I~ I ~..~c.w..
. .>" j' 8I;".~
~,~ ~. 1
.,~ .. I
,~ 61",.,' I ., q
t
.
~,
...
/"
l~! ~....
~UI""..
I '"'I..
J
......
(","'~
~/>
- 0:t""'.~1l"".
":',- .,.,
Iii _ _ .;;
,
l~ ,
{/ ,
, ,
,
1.w' .~
~'~
~ -
.... I
.. .
"'r
i
...-..
<....... I
I
,..- ..
d
..-
~MAu.
~
iIl.~4.,.
t::J.....
.
i .-
! \. -..
,
..----..,
.
~
.
1
.
:
~
..
~"
UUl'l~oA
r
~
;.
\
~
~
j
\
.
,...,...'
,
.....lll'l..
.
02.557510
Milo~
IiiIii a CHRISTOPHER A. JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES 0
Environmental Planning and Research
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 ~
Feet
~
I
J
'--
i\
.
,
11""'-''''
'\,
~"
.
.'
.r-
I
I
-"~
. ,""d
~ ..
Figure 1
Gateway Business Park Master Plan
Regional & Project Location
N ~ fJl
Q) 2 Q)
~ fJl fJl
::JCIl:l
.Ql~ 1:l
LL""c
~ CIl
CIl...J
(L0l
fJl C
fJl .-
Q)1:l
C C
._ ::J
fJl 0
::J ~
f1l 5
>,(j)
~o<S
Q)-
- ()
CIl Q)
C)'o
~
(L
c
.!!l
(L
a
a
ro
a
a
~
'0
0
a !O.
a
a 0
jj
UJ
a
a
'"
a
e
Vl
W
!;(
u--'=
Ot'
Vl"
Vl~
<( Q)
00""
I"2
CL "
WOl
Vlc
0-
--,c
c
."
<(-
CL
""-
W "
Ie
CL ill
OE
I- c
VlO
0::::. -~
I EO
Uw
~
I
I
I
C') c
Q) CU
~(L
::J ~
0lQ)
LL1i)
CU
~
-""
~
CU
(L
fJl
fJl
Q)
C
'00
::J
OJ
>,
CU
~
Q)
-
CU
C)
~
,
<0 !
, <
- ]
8
,
. .
.
. e
" ,
..
\.
rt
Vl
W
!;(
U{i
O~
VlQ)
Vl",
<(~
aOIJ
Ie
CL <1l
wOl
Vlc
O'c
cO J C
o . <1l
~ <(0::
cy'_
W,:'J
Ie
CL ill
OE
I- c
Vle
a::: -:;:
Ie
~ Uw
l~
<fJ
'"
N
'"'
ro
,.
"'
w
ro
g
~
Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report
Date:
October 22,2008
To:
Responsible Agencies, Agencies with Jurisdiction by Law, Trustee
Agencies, Involved Federal Agencies, and AgenciesiPeople
Requesting Notice
From:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of
Economic Development
A TNN: Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator
315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Re:
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
The City of South San Francisco (Lead Agency) will prepare an EIR for the proposed
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project. This Notice of Preparation (NOP) is being
distributed to applicable responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Comments from interested
agencies are requested as to the scope and content of the environmental information that
is pertinent to each agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed
project. The project location and development description are summarized below. An
Initial Study is not attached.
Project Location: The Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project (project) is located in
the City of South San Francisco (the City), approximately 1.5 miles north of San Francisco
International Airport (SFO) and approximately 10 miles south of downtown San Francisco.
The project site is bounded by Oyster Point Boulevard on the north, Gateway Boulevard
on the west, a narrow band of vacant land to the east, and a hotel to the south. Local
access to the master plan area is currently provided from Oyster Point and Gateway
Boulevards and regional access is primarily provided by US 101. Figure 1 illustrates the
regional and project site location. The Project site and surrounding land uses are shown
in Figure 2.
Project Characteristics: The project consists of a Master Plan and a Phase 1 Precise
Plan (Precise Plan) for the phased removal and replacement of existing buildings on the
22.6 acre project site and construction of five to six new office buildings and two to four
parking structures. The project would most likely be constructed in phases over 5 to 10
years. Table 1 shows the phasing of the buildout for the project.
The applicant proposes to increase the density on the site to an FAR of 1.25. This change
in FAR translates to an increase in development at the site from approximately 284,000 sf
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 1
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
to approximately 1,230,570 sf., or a net change of 946,570 sf. The Precise Plan would
define the first phase of the project while other phases of the project are more conceptual
in nature.
Table 1
Existing and Estimated Build Out
Estimated Square Footage
Range
Phase Address Build Out Year Existing From To Approximate Parking
Square Floor Plate Spaces
Footage
1a 900 2011 50,000 - 186,100 30,000 459
1b 850 2013 19,272 - 173,700 30,000 459
Total- Phase 1 359,800 359,800 918
2 1000 2014 62,110 210,000 245,000 35,000 624
Total- Phase 2 569,800 604,800 1,542
3 I 800' 2016.2017 45,400 125,000 175,000 25,000 446
Total- Phase 3 694,800 779,800 1,988
4 I 750 2018 52,133 160,000 192,000 32,000 489
Total- Phase 4 869,800 971,800 2,477
5 700 2020 55,098 175,000 258,570 35,000 623
Total Project 971,800 1,230,370 3,100
Source: Chamberlin Associates, 2008.
"Demolished as pari of Phase 1._ but not reconstructed until Phase 3.
Figure 3 illustrates the Gateway Business Park Master Plan layout. The new office
buildings would be situated primarily along Gateway Boulevard at the western border and
the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Oyster Point Boulevard. The project would
include 3,100 parking spaces with the parking structures situated on the southeastern
border of the master plan area. The internal areas of the project site would contain the
Central Commons incorporating open space areas, landscaping, and pedestrian
walkways. The Precise Plan boundaries are shown in Figure 4. The Precise Plan
boundaries would extend from the Oyster Point access driveway, behind 180 and 200
Oyster Point Boulevard, and around 900, 800, and 850 Gateway to the eastern site
border.
The project would include a General Plan Amendment, zoning text changes to SSFMC
Chapter 20.57, and adoption of a TDM Plan. The Master Plan and Precise Plan include
development standards for the project site and conceptual site planning, building
frameworks, open space network, landscape, signage lighting, and vehicle, pedestrian,
and bicycle circulation guidelines. All future Master Plan developments will be subject to a
separate precise plan and CEQA review as established in SSFMC Chapter 20.57.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 2
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
The Gateway Business Park Master Plan is intended to create a high-density,
contemporary, high-quality business park. This would be accomplished by a phased and
incremental replacement of the existing buildings with new buildings that are modern,
more energy efficient, and to better support the ongoing evolution of the life sciences
industry. The community of new buildings would be organized in a campus-style setting
that is pedestrian friendly, attractive, well connected, and with a variety of usable spaces.
To achieve the goals and objectives of the Master Plan, the following site planning and
organizational principles would be followed:
(a) Design new buildings that engage the public street frontage and the Central
Commons open space.
(b) Design new internal buildings that receive employees and visitors as part of a
primary arrival sequence.
(c) Concentrate parking into parking structures situation along the southeastern
boundary of the project site.
(d) Develop a pedestrian-friendly Central Commons open space in the area created
by the parking structure and the building placement strategy.
(e) Enhance public street frontage and foster transit use by providing multiple
pedestrian connections to and from the internal campus and shuttle system stops.
(f) Create an inviting and enriched arrival experience to the primary "corporate
landing" between the internal buildings and to other possible arrival areas within
the campus.
(g) Provide an appropriate landscape edge to the parking structure as it relates to the
Central Commons.
Planning Background: The project site is designated as Business Commercial in the
City of South San Francisco General Plan (General Plan), which was adopted in 1999.
The project site is located within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, which was adopted
by the City in 1994. The land use plan within the East of 101 Area Plan designates the
majority of the East of 101 Area as Planned Industrial. Land use policies and designations
of the General Plan supersede those outlined in the East of 101 Area Plan. The East of
101 Area Plan will need to be updated to become consistent with the General Plan but this
action is not part of the proposed project.
Within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, the project is located in Gateway Specific Plan
Redevelopment District zoning. The Gateway Specific Plan was adopted prior to adoption
of the 1999 South San Francisco General Plan. The Specific Plan serves to refine and to
implement the General Plan with respect to the specific plan area and to combine the
concepts, procedures, and regulations of the General Plan, redevelopment plan, zoning
ordinance, and certain aspects of the subdivision ordinance. The zoning regulations for
this district have been incorporated into the City's municipal code as set forth in Sections
20.57.060 through 20.57.670. Although the General Plan permits up to an FAR of 1.0, the
Gateway Specific Plan allows an FAR of 1.25 on the site. The project will include a
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 3
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
General Plan Amendment to update the FAR for the project site to 1.25, consistent with
the zoning. All regulations in the municipal code relating to the Master Plan area shall
govern its development unless otherwise indicated in the proposed Master Plan. The
Gateway Master Plan area is classified as Research & Development and Office for the
purposes of determining parking requirements.
EIR Sections: Based on the project description and the Lead Agency's understanding of
the environmental issues associated with the project, the following topics will be analyzed
in detail in the EIR:
. Aesthetics-impacts to scenic vistas, visual character and quality, and
light and glare.
. Air Quality-impacts to air quality standards (construction and project
operations), increases in air pollutants, Greenhouse Gases, and
exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutants and odors.
. Biological Resources-impacts to sensitive species, habitat, wetlands,
migratory wildlife corridors, and conflicts with local policies or plans
protecting biological resources.
. Cultural Resources-impacts to historic, archeological, or paleontological
resources: or disturbance of human remains.
. Geology and Soils-impacts to people or structures through exposure to
seismic hazards (faults, ground shaking, liquefaction), soil erosion,
expansive or unstable soils, and septic tanks.
. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-impacts from use, transport, or
disposal of hazardous materials, location on a hazardous site, emission
of hazardous materials, location within a public or private airport area,
interference with an adopted emergency response plan, and wildland
fires.
. Hydrology and Water Quality-impacts to water quality and groundwater
supplies, alteration of drainage patterns resulting in erosion or flooding,
increase in run-off, placement of housing or structures in 1 DO-flood
areas, and risk of flooding, seiche, tsunami, or mudflows.
. Land UseiPlanning-impacts to established communities and conflicts
with land use plans including habitat conservation plans.
. Noise-impacts to people from excessive noise (including construction,
project-generated traffic, and aircraft noise) or groundborne vibration,
and increase in permanent ambient noise levels.
. Population/Housing-impacts through substantial increases in
population, loss of housing, and displacement of people.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 4
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
. Public Services and Recreation-impacts associated with the need for
new government facilities to serve the project including fire and police
protection or other public facilities.
. TransportationiTraffic-impacts to intersection and roadway Level of
Service, change in air traffic patterns, hazardous roadways, inadequate
emergency access, inadequate parking, or conflict with alternative
transportation policies.
. Utilities and Service Systems-impacts associated with the need for
new utilities to serve the project including wastewater treatment, water
supply, storm drainage, and solid waste.
No agricultural or mineral resources are located on the site: therefore, agricultural and
mineral resources will not be addressed in the EIR.
Alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR will be defined based on their potential to reduce or
eliminate significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The
specific alternatives to be evaluated in the EIR may include, but are not limited to, the "No
Project" alternative as required by CEQA and a reduced development alternative.
NOP Notice: The Lead Agency solicits comments regarding the scope and content of the
EIR from all interested parties requesting notice, responsible agencies, agencies with
jurisdiction by law, trustee agencies, and involved agencies. In accordance with the time
limits established by CEQA, please send your response at the earliest possible date, but
no later than thirty days after receipt of this notice.
Please send your writtenityped comments (including a name, telephone number, and
contact information) to the following:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of Economic
Development
A TNN: Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator
P.O. Box 711, South San Francisco, CA 94083
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Or via email to:mike.lappen@ssf.net.
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS ON
THE SCOPE OF THE EIR TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED
IN THE EIR.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 5
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
For additional information, please contact Mike Lappen at (650) 877-8535.
Michael Lappen
Economic Development Coordinator
Date: /;///o?
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 6
.....
.....
...........
\'~ ........:.
.".
....... ~ ......
, ''1'
.
f
1~'
(T~
.
~
!
" \l'
.~ QM ~
".t>"fIQ),
~ 1
.
~
.
\.
~
- "
,.~ --
~ ~
,~ S
.~ .':~~..:"
'" ., t.. ...._
<.. .'..... '""
.~ .,......" 3i
I~ I ~..~c.w..
. .>" j' 8I;".~
~,~ ~. 1
.,~ .. I
,~ 61",.,' I ., q
t
.
~,
...
/"
l~! ~....
~UI""..
I '"'I..
J
......
(","'~
~/>
- 0:t""'.~1l"".
":',- .,.,
Iii _ _ .;;
,
l~ ,
{/ ,
, ,
,
1.w' .~
~'~
~ -
.... I
.. .
"'r
i
...-..
<....... I
I
,..- ..
d
..-
~MAu.
~
iIl.~4.,.
t::J.....
.
i .-
! \. -..
,
..----..,
.
~
.
1
.
:
~
..
~"
UUl'l~oA
r
~
;.
\
~
~
j
\
.
s...". .,
,
.....lll'l..
.
02.557510
Milo~
IiiIii a CHRISTOPHER A. JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES 0
Environmental Planning and Research
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 I-!\.
~~~
Feet
~
I
J
'--
i\
.
,
11""'-''''
'\,
~"
.
.'
.r-
I
I
-"~
. ,""d
~ ..
Figure 1
Gateway Business Park Master Plan
Regional & Project Location
N ~ fJl
Q) 2 Q)
~ fJl fJl
::JCIl:l
.Ql~ 1:l
LL""c
~ CIl
CIl...J
(L0l
fJl C
fJl .-
Q)1:l
C C
._ ::J
fJl 0
::J ~
f1l 5
>,(j)
~o<S
Q)-
- ()
CIl Q)
C)'o
~
(L
c
.!!l
(L
a
a
ro
a
a
~
'0
0
a !O.
a
a 0
jj
UJ
a
a
'"
a
e
Vl
W
!;(
u--'=
Ot'
Vl"
Vl~
<( Q)
00""
I"2
CL "
WOl
Vlc
0-
--,c
c
."
<(-
CL
""-
W "
Ie
CL ill
OE
I- c
VlO
0::::. -~
I EO
Uw
~
I
I
I
C') c
Q) CU
~(L
::J ~
0lQ)
LL1i)
CU
~
-""
~
CU
(L
fJl
fJl
Q)
C
'00
::J
OJ
>,
CU
~
Q)
ro
C)
~
,
<0 !
, <
- ]
8
,
. .
.
. e
" ,
..
\.
rt
Vl
W
!;(
U{i
O~
VlQ)
Vl",
<(~
aOIJ
Ie
CL <1l
wOl
Vlc
O'c
cO J C
o . <1l
~ <(0::
cy'_
W,:'J
Ie
CL ill
OE
I- c
Vle
a::: -:;:
Ie
~ Uw
l~
<fJ
'"
N
'"'
ro
,.
"'
w
ro
g
~
'<t c
Q) Cll
:;0..
0lQ)
.- UJ
LL ._
U
Q)
~
0..
..c
~
e --0
C
0 Cll
0
N
~ ~ Cll
~ 0 ~
'" ~
0 Q)
,
0 UJ
0
0 Cll
, .r:
<: 0..
0
0
"
~
.,' '0
, t.
.
0 ~
~ n
,,;
~
~
'"
,
1"
a
>
"
::i
al
- - - - - - - - - -::- ~ -
1\'W1WI \
Vl
W
~
u..c
02
Vlm
Vl~
<t<!J
060::
I1?
1Lm
WOJ
Vlc
0; 0-
0 -,c
0 C
N 'm
06 <t-
o..
N 0::_
w Wm
c
~ Ie
.
ui 1L<!J
w OE
~ 10
'u I- c
UJ 0 VlO
1:) 00 - ~
) .g: 0:: .-
Q) IE
"e .~
(L ~ Uw
-" ~
E
ro
-'"
0
w
u
~
0
en
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE afPLANNING AND RESEARCH
STATE CLEARlNGHOUSEAND PLANNING UNIT
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
GOVERNOR
Notice of Pre para lion
October 22, 2008
To: Reviewing Agencies
Re: Gateway Busiuess Park Master Plan Project
SCH# 2008062059
~~tli'PI.ANNt.
~"~.
."9 ~~
I * ~
ffi ..-. :Ii
~.,~.!il
tP~ ~"fo
rSOfCllt\f~~
CYNTHIA BRYANT
DmECfOR
Attached for your review and comment is the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Gateway Business Park Master
Plan Project draft EnvirOlmlenta1 Impact RepOli (EIR).
Responsible agencies must tmnsmit their comments on the scope and content of the NOP, focusing on specific.
information related to theu' own statutory responsibility, within 30 davs of receipt of the NOP from the Lead
Agency. TillS is a courtesy notice provided by the State Clearinghouse \\~th a reminder for you to comment Ul a
tunely manner. We el1COlU~age other agencies to also respond to this notice and express their concerns early in the
environmental review. process.
Please direct your comments to:
'Mike Lappen
City of South San Francisco
P.O. BoxBll
South San Francisco, CA 94083
with a copy to the State Clealinghouse in the Office of PlaIDling and Research. Please refer to the SCH number
noted above Ul all conespondence concerning this project.
If you have any questions about the enviroml1ental document review process, please call the State Clearillghou.se at
(916) 445-0613.
Sincerely,
f;J"--- ~ ""
Scott Morgan
Assistant Deputy Director & Senior Planner, State Clealinghouse
Attachments
cc: Lead Agency
1400 lOth Street P.O, Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044
(916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov
,
-......1.
SCH#
Project Title
Lead Agency
Document Details Report
State Clearinghouse Data Bas
2008062059
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
South San Francisco, City 01
Type NOP Notice of Preparation
Description Phased removal and replacement of existing buildings on the 22.6 acre project site and construction of
five to six new office buildings and two to four parking structures. The project proposes increase in
development at the site form approximately 284,000 sf to approximately 1,230,570 sf., or a net change
of 946,570 sf.
Lead Agency Contact
Name Mike Lappen
Agency City of South San Francisco
Phone (650) 677-6535
email
Address
City
Fax
P.O. Box 711
South San Francisco
State CA Zip 94063
Project Location
County San Mateo
City South San Francisco
Region
Cross Streets
Latl Long
Parcel No. various
Township
Gateway Blvd. and Oyster Point Blvd.
37" 39' 33.46" N 1122' 23' 44.27" W
Range
Section Base
Proximity to:
Highways US 101, 1-380
Airports SFO
Railways Union Pacific, BART, CalTrain
Waterways San Francisco Bay
Schools Martin, Spruce
Land Use Business Commercial/Gateway Specific Plan Redevelopment District
Project Issues
Air Quality; Archaeologic-Historic; Biological Resources: Drainage/Absorption; Flood Plain/Flooding;
Geologic/Seismic; Noise; PopulationlHousing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks;
Schools/Universities; Septic System; Sewer Capacity; Soil ErosioniCompactionfGrading; Solid Waste:
Toxic/Hazardous: Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quaiity; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian;
Wildlife: Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects; AestheticNisual
Reviewing
Agencies
Resources Agency: Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Parks and Recreation; San
Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission: Department of Water Resources;
Department of Fish and Game, Region 3; Native American Heritage Commission; Public Utilities
Commission; Caltrans, Division of Aeronautics; California Highway Patrol: Caltrans, District 4;
Integrated Waste Management Board; Department of Toxic Substances Controi; Regional Water
Quality Control Board, Region 2
Start of Review 10/2212008
End of Review 11/20/2006
Date Received 10/22/2008
t':
.....,..
'-,1
,.
, '~j '......~
- " .. , .. -- ~: -
: .. .- --
o
~!l
COO
~, ;:r
ro'l>'
I",
ro ro
33
1}ro
~ ;a
'" ro
rotc
~ -.
o
~
~
m
0"
g iii"
",;:r
1S:1>'
Sg>
" 3
:c.
;0
.
tc
0"
~
~
on'"
ro 0 ro
cr 3 !:!'.
~3~
{~
'" ro
"- ::.
~ ~
'< ",
:I:
.
O.
S;
tc
ro
Ii!
00
~
C
'C
a.
"'.
<>
'"
o
"
'"
E:!
~
w
~
'"
'"
00
o
II
mOl 0
" " .
""0"
a-:::+Q)
::1:TI?-
~~g,
~ "
ro -
- .
;:r
'"
'"
'"
3
.
CI)
m
5.
o
'"
'"
o
:;:.
ur
o'
"
C1JI>'Gl
Iii",o
$'m~
Qro3
rn.O
~n;}
,,'"
'" .0
g- 31
fii '2
'" 0
~
"
;;-
o
o
3'
lC
01;\1
::T
OJ
::l
C.
G)
OJ
:3
CD
o
n
o
"
00
ro
;;>
'"
"
"
'<
2
'" ,
a. l1r"'C
~g I""
GJ r:l Q.
~rn:.;;
g~w..
ro ~
~ ;0
" ro
'< 00
o
c
i'l
'"
.
o ' 0 bll~
00 00 :3 Cll
~~ g~ ~.~
Ui"Q "< "tJ <Il 0..
nO m.., 0'<0
..", C. 0 ::::I::l
5l m ~iif en--
H atll
OlE 0 0
ro "OJ
o n ~
o 0 C.
'" 3 '"
g> 3
<. if
0' ci"
m ~
o
000
mn
3:!!.
~[
;::~
",,_00
iilo
fflcn
s:
~
....
no
m"
~'lil
ng
0",
0",
a~
~. g.
-."
Om
-!!l.
n
a:
'"
'"
r.2l
"
Iii
~
0'
'"
;;:n
n' !!!.
5fq'
~g
z_oo
~E
'" .
as:
~
'"
o
no
mro
~;;
g~
B:~
~ -.
"' "
om
m C
"C-
_00
ro ~
_ ro
"
o
ro
00
n
o
~
-
-
'!e.
o
o
s:
ro
-
00
'" .
~~
"-",
~~
,@-c
'<in'
s:
~
en
II
Doom
S:ID'S'
~~lD
g::l~
g,i/i'!l.
~@ ~
"'-;0
&"Wm
3! g
'" "
~ m
"
o
,.,
-
2-
lD
o
ro
a.
C1);o
~ :.;;
00
-. n
J!:'"
0",
::0
'"
<a
C
~
$
~: 0
c;n
'" .
III -,
o@
ro "
a..1II
go
-- iii
J:l',
:[
...
o
oacntoUl
-ro'-og
ffi'aa..m ....
a:;;t](ll aOl
~1il~ :.;;
o c;!: 5" tal
-,,0.... S'
~:Jro ..,
'" 0:3
-~-
!li-J:>,.
o S
c
w.
~
o
C1)::o
~:!;
Iii 0
n
~"'.
ro 00
::0
'"
'"
o'
~
~
._g
0<0
'" '" ro
-OB"tI
r-~...
o nO
-ro-
Is:"I1
m ro C
__c-
::;:'5"=
~'< "
D I
~. ro
o .
'" -
~. s=
:;:
'"
<>
,
"'0
2 !!!.
" -
ro @
"'0
ro 00
-ic
ro _.
" 00
. 'f
B,"
'"
:!;
III
m
-
p
C
!!l.
~
o
11
<nom
-. .
~<i.:n
m:""lII
S:n'"
"0'"
15:30
OJ 3 g
3' .
ro
<.
'"
a.
o
~
l1'
o
m" 0
~5.g
;;;" W r"
oGlo
~ro-
3~Gl
CD ia>
a:::j:l~
III ro
en il.
m '"
<. ro
" <.'
~ 0'
<n ro
" oo
"
'"
o
"
o
;;:n
'" '"
- -
,,-
" @
=-:~
" 00
0_
GlO
a;"
~3:
_0
ro -
N '"
;00
" .
x'"
'--@
'" 0
~_oo
~ ~
o oo
~
:l.
a
~
o
[I;'
00
o
c
-
"
*
n
o
o
-
-
!2.
o
0::0
Q.:!;
~ 0
'" n
g-lD
;0'"
<'
ro
-
ID
ro
'"
5'
'"
'"
"'
D
"
:3
s"o
ro " ro
" 0 0
;>;"r;'q
IO.
ctIl::".-
OJ 0 <
-~ .
Q.tD~
0""
'" '
- "
"'-
o
o
'"
o
o
tJ:::DOJlD
-rn 0-
:s.((J Ell ~
Q!.o..,(tI
gmc.~
0- '"
""'II""Q ;-
:!la ..,
"oo
ro ~
" 00
9.3
'" oo
);c
[JJ 2,
oo -
or
or
"
n
m
o
"'mo
'" ~ ~
" s.'C
Q"..., ....
000
0"_
3"tl
m m
" -
-'"
w.oo
CIlil'
m"
~ ro
'" n
a~
'" 0
"'!!'.
ii' 5'
"
o
"tlC
" ~
IT",
=.
n ::l-
OJ.
no
:c~
8Gl
-0
no
o ro
~ .
"'-
2''"
g~
0_.
" 0
ro
00
000"
~ s-g
:- ~ Co
g,(J)~
""',,
8 11,10
..... CD:3,
-~"
ro ' 0
" '"
'" c'
~ .
~.
g
E'
"
o
CD
o
;:j.
OJ
-
o'
;:J
o
'"
IJl
o
C
-
o
o
00
n'
o
o
-
-
!2.
CIl1!:O
C '" .
co::!;:
o~O'
r=~ 3
m 3"~
'0-
'<~o
-;;
"'to
0_
. ~
- it
"'c.
:;:
'"
oo
It
o
.
:';;"'0
m;31
'<"'0
o '" ~
CD :< o.
Olll ~
0-0::
::10_
2!.:J !i
Q. 0
~ :::I.
" 0
O~
::r
CD
~
Cl
Cll
::cnc:c
omroo
Co" C
~':bo !!.1Jl
.a 00,,"
0"'10
"03l1'
gamn
~ 5".... c
oe!. 3
<' ~ 3
w" L:
- "
o _
" ..,
tm
II
;t:n
-.
,,-
~ "T1
;0"
o ~
IT
"
jjj-
o
o
OJ
;:j.'
:3
([l
;:J
fir
o
O"'n
31~!!!.
gWa:
0'< 3
......=" -,
CIlm.
16-<:J:
U: (Q'
'" '"
- ::
41 .PJ
,Q. ~
'" ."
n ~
!if q-
!l.
o
s::;-
~g.
'"
-i-
0-::1-
-'"
~:c
2 -
-0.2-
ro
(l.
oo
;;:GlO
00 " .
:l.0'C
:::I to r"
" '" 0
::0--
roOO"
ro ID -.
-Ill 00
On'"
" I>'
Gl
00
3
o
1!:
" -i'
ro OJ
s."
::000
roil
3::.
~!!t
5'0
"' 0
<>>"11
3~.
Q.
o
"
En
o
o :
'" " ~
ro3~
m30
"'-3
~ ~.;-
aOm
'" 0 ~
.
-
'"
""
o
g
o ~
::~
3'0
~ .Q-
3 ~
~!if
o
0''''
~~
<," go
-'ro <: ~n
S-:::r< ID tt'I
000 "
":1::1 :;:om
,,~n
~~to~,
tD;:U m 0
::1 roo <:: :::I
"'oo -
:J __ OJ.
n 0 ~
",0
OOl
3l~
n
ro
;>:)0;0
'" ~ :;:
~~O
5"~n
oo < ID
IDoo",
Qj=::a
" ~
n'<
"'::0
O~
3l~
~..:..
-'!!
O . DO;>:)
. . ~:!;
11()A] ~ 0
.... ('p <:: _0
en:J <; <to"
~!:fO GJ r.n
o~o arm
m<tD' '<
@ ~ UI ;;U
~ a;"Tt ~
:::r"< --
oAt g
3l~
~ g-
]]
]]
-in
" 00
3.~
".
'" 0
o .
"
~"tl
n- ;-
~
o
;-
10
-0
-o-G)""I"l
a~ ID iii'
tOgg:=-
ill ;;:0 po
3gcn41
a Gl 00
- ro 3
::C:fiCll
m-i5"
61'- g
C1 o'
o ~
;;: '"
2 ~
<>>
'"
o
o
o
,-i;o
o,,~
~mo
0"'0
"';OlD
~o :..
l?l.g.
;0'"
J!:~
o'
"
~
D~
"
m
'"
o
C
~
"
IJl
'"
o
.
a
0.0
<no
"''''
"'"tl
ar'
~ 0
I-
00
~ 0
'" "
=oo
~
2
1!i-
0'
~
Gln
<1> 0
Ole
u:~
::0"-
. 0
b1;o
3 <'
:3 ro
~ ~
~g'
ro '"
~a
o
iif~!t
D'O':c
iif 5' po
-00
"QG)~.
0'" 3
m8"(tI
~~::o
<>>-ro
'" to
o -,
" 0
'0 "
a '"
<D
OJ
3
1Ig'
'"
~~~ 5'
:J'" _ CD
c. 0 ~ en
'< :s m OJ
IooO
CD ~ III
'" -,
~~E
a ~.
oo
o'
o
o
~
o
Q1.
m
--c
)>
o
0;0
m :!;
2-0
iil.n
0'"
0'"
'"
fIl.
;0
ro
<D
o'
~
~
mnn
== Q !OS
iil3=ii
D'3D
~iil2.
.,,~, '"
rOn
,,~o
C '"
" '"
'" -
oo !!.
o
IO"
'~g E
~a;;"
-"'~
0<>> Gl
09-00
~ ~. 3
ro~1tI
~ Ii'
'" 10
o -.
:l 0
"tl "
- en
o
<(J
OJ
:3
--l
~
W
::l
'"
Il<>
I
o
c:
'"
S'
~~ ;I
aJ (lI::r
:l ~ 0
.., 0 ro
'-- '" ;0
oo-~
o -110
.0 ;;0-,
"--00
ro:t>~
tIl_~
"
;r
~
~
5'
lC
o
;00
'" '"
<>>-
~ 'f
,,'"
. ~
o.~
i!;!
3 i!l-
c- ~.
'" "
0.-
'" ~
;S'N
o
mam;;tl
~c~~
0_, (;)
:1;19: g C1
~ ~:3 m
D.oQl N
en ~ ::I
B Qi
ID 0
'" 0
'<: g
f:il 3
'" > ~
0" a
:J
:El
o
00
'" '"
<'C
c.:r-
'--0
0_
"'ID
, 0
00 00
0",
~ "
'"
I>'
:;:
.,
~
'"
:l
m
'"
'"
o
,--'"
" -.
=In
m:c
<il'
<>>
o t:l
" 00
ro 3
o
;0
'"
10,
o
,
...
o
$;'"
00 or
:l.~
" ro
w,
IDro
OJ 0
" "-
0.00
n
o
3
3
in
00
o'
o
o
'--C)
'" '"
0_
8-g
~.ffl
oo c
g ~.
~ :t
"'p.
~
~
c}n
3 ~
-
:?~
3 _00
f2g
00
~
:l.
a
~
Q
II
zo;o
o"'~
~2:C
C1~n
00 '"
Bl:r:....
~"
;0"-
" '"
"' 0
-."
o
~
~
o
2;0
'" '"
"'"
'" 0
=c
Gli'l
'" '"
'< 00
g l>
10
o
~
"
'"
0-m1
o
o
GlC)
ro 00
'< -
CD@
;o~
000
",-
,,0
" -
",00
",'f
.., [
10
o
Bl
;0
CD
'"
o
c:
~
n
Cll
'"
)>
Cll
::l
D
:z
o
"'tl
g
U1
....
::!.
0'
~
!:l:
o
::l
r
iii'
....
o
GJ;:
g-",
,::'il'
:!!Gl
o 00
'" :3
,..~
.m ;0
.
to
0-
"
w
'--"T1
ro -,
,,"00
0'"
a I>'
:J'Gl
<D ro
m 3
ffi ~
" ;0
~
'"
o'
'"
'"
o
!II
Gl''''
COO
. ,
~ ~
'" 00.
'<;;:
" 0
:;:~
'" n
" .
"'lD
~
'"
;0
IJl
Q
~
o'
"
"'"tl
'" c
" c-
,'"
'" 0
;;,c::
Ul::;
'"
~.
n
o
:3
3
in'
'"
0"
"
C"J
o
!::
::l
....
'<
J?
...
$
o
DC)
<>> 00
0'"
"';
o ~
-g ~tIl
'"0
~iii'
3:
a
'"
\J)
C"J
:I:
'l't:
m;o
a CD
wea
~ -.
c.a
::l
;o!l!.
:;f::;;:
Ow
OeD
m~
D
c:
~
-<
o
o
::l
<;'
9.
l'l:I
C
C
Oll
o
QlI
.t\:j
Q
~
, ftQ
r
I
Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report
Date:
October 22, 2008
To:
Responsible Agencies, Agencies with Jurisdiction by Law, Trustee
Agencies, Involved Federal Agencies, and Agencies/People
Requesting Notice
From:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of
Economic Development
A TNN: Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator
315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Re:
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project .
The City of South San Francisco (Lead Agency) will prepare an EIR for the proposed
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project. This Notice of Preparation (NOP) is being
distributed to applicable responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Comments from interested
agencies are requested as to the scope and content of the environmental information that
is pertinent to each agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed
project. . The project location and development description are summarized below. An
Initial Study is not attached. .
Project Location: The Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project (project) is located in
the City of South San Francisco (the City), approximately 1.5 miles north of San Francisco
International Airport (SFO) and approximately 10 miles south of downtown San Francisco.
The project site is bounded by Oyster'Point Boulevard on the north, Gateway Boulevard
on the west, a narrow band of vacant land to the east, and a hotel to the south. Local
access to the master plan. area is currenUyprovided from Oyster Point and Gateway
Boulevards and regional access is primarily provided by US 101. Figure 1 illustrates the
regional and project site location. The Project site and surrounding land uses are shown
in Figure 2. .
Project Characteristics: The project consists of a Master Plan and a Phase 1 Precise
Plan (Precise Plan) for the phased removal and replacement of existing buildings on the
22.6 acre project site and'construction of five to six new office buildings and two to four
parking structures. The project would most likely be constructed in phases over 5 to 10
years. Table 1 shows the phasing of the buildout for the project.
The applicant proposes to increase the density on the site to an FAR of 1.25. This change
in FAR translates to an increase in development at the site from approximately 284,000 sf
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 1
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
to approximately 1,230,570 sf., or a net change of 946,570 sf. The Precise Plan would
define the first phase of the project while other phases of the project are more conceptual
in nature.
Estimat~d Square Footage. , .
. Range ,
Phase Address Build Out Year Existing From To Approximate Parking
- Square Floor Plate Spaces
Footage ' ,
.
1a 900 , 2011 50,000 - 186,100 30,000 459
1b 850 2013 19,272 - 173,700 30,000 459
Total - Phase 1 359,800 359,800 918
2 1000 2014 62,110 210,000 245,000 35,000 624
Total - Phase 2 569,800 604,800 1,542
3 800', I 2016-2017 45,400 125,000 175,000 25,000 446
Total - Phase 3 694,800 779,800 1,988
4 1750 I 2018 52,133 160,000 192,000 32,000 489
Total - Phase 4 869,800 971,800 2,477
5 I 700 I 2020 55,098 175,000 258,570 35.000 623
Total Project 971,800 1,230,370 3.100
Source: Chamberlin Associates, 2008.
'Demolished as part of Phase 1, but not reconstructed until Phase 3:
Table 1
Existing and Estimated Build Out
Figure 3 illustrates the Gateway Business Park Master Plan layout. The new office
buildings would be situated primarily along Gateway Boulevard at the western border and
the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Oyster Point Boulevard. The project would
.include 3,100 parking spaces with the parking structures situated on the southeastern
border of the master plan area. The internal areas of the project site would contain the
Central Commons' incorporating open space areas, landscaping, and pedestrian
walkways. The Precise Plan boundaries are shown in Figure 4. The Precise Plan
boundaries would extend from the Oyster Poinlaccess driveway, behind 180 and'200 .
Oyster Point Boulevard, and around 900, 800, and 850 Gateway to the eastern site.
border.
The project would include a General Plan Amendment, zoning text changes to SSFMC
Chapter 20.57, and adoption of a TDM Plan. The Master Plan and Precise Plan include
development standards for the project site and conceptual site planning, building
frameworks, open space network, landscape, sign age lighting, and vehicle, pedestrian,
and bicycle circulation guidelines. All future Master Plan developments will be subject to a
separate precise plan and CEOA review as established in SSFMC Chapter 20.57.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 2
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
The Gateway Business Park Master Plan is intended .to create a high-density,
contemporary, high-quality business park. This would be accomplished by a phased and
incremental replacement of the existing buildings with new buildings that are modern,
more energy efficient, and to better support the ongoing evolution of the life sciences
industry. The community of new buildings would be organized in a campus-style setting
that is pedestrian friendly, attractive, well connected, and with a variety of usable spaces.
To achieve the goals and objectives of the Master Plan, the following site planning and
organizational principles would be followed:
(a) Design new buildings that engage the public street frontage and the Central
Commons open space.
(b) Design new internal buildings that receive employees and visitors as part of a
primary, arrival sequence.
(c) Concentrate parking into parking structures situation along the southeastern
boundary of the project site.
(d) Develop a pedestrian-friendly Central Commons open space in the area created
by the parking structure and the building placement strategy.
(e) Enhance publiC street frontage and foster transit use by providing multiple
pedestrian connections to and from the internal campus and shuttle system slops.
(f) Create an inviting and enriched arrival experience to the primary "corporate
landing" between the internal buildings and to other possible arrival areas within
the campus.
(g) Provide an appropriate landscape edge to the parking structure as it relates to the
Central Commons.
Planning Background: The project site is designated as Business Commercial in the
City of South San Francisco General Plan (General Plan), which was adopted in 1999.
The project site is located within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, which was adopted
by the City in 1994. The land use plan within the East of 101 Area Plan designates the
majoritY of the East of 101 Area as Planned Industrial. Land use policies and designations
of the General Plan supersede those outlined in the East of 101 Area Plan. The East of
101 Area Plan will need to be updated to become consistent with the General Plan but this
action is not part of the proposed project.
Within the East of 101 Area Plan sub-area, the project is located in Gateway Specific Plan
Redevelopment District zoning. The Gateway Specific Plan was adopted prior to adoption
of the 1999 South San Francisco 'General Plan. The Specific Plan serves to refine and to
implement the General Plan with respect to the specific plan area and to combine the
concepts, procedures, and regulations of the General Plan, redevelopment plan, zoning
ordinance, and certain aspects of the subdivision ordinance. The zoning regulations for
this district have been incorporated into the City's municipal code as set forth in Sections
20.57.060 through 20.57.670. Although the General Plan permits up to an FAR of 1.0, the
Gateway Specific Plan allows .an FAR of 1.25 on the site. The project will include a
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 3
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
General Plan Amendment to update the FAR for the project site to 1.25, consistent with
the zoning. All regulations in the municipal code relating to the Master Plan area shall
govern its development unless otherwise indicated in the proposed Master Plan. The
Gateway Master Plan area is classified as Research & Development and Office for the
purposes of determining parking requirements.
EIR Sections: Based on the project description and the Lead Agency's understanding of
the environmental issues associated with the project, the following topics will be analyzed
in detail in the EIR: ..
.
Aesthetics-impacts to scenic vistas, visual character and quality, and
light and glare.
.
Air Quality-impacts to air quality standards (construction and project
operations), increases in air pollutants, Greenhouse Gases, and
exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutants and odors.
.
BiOlogical Resources-impacts to sensitive species, habitat, wetlands,
migratory wildlife corridors, and conflicts with local policies or plans .
protecting biological resources.
.
Cultural Resources-impacts to historic, archeological, or paleontological
resources; or disturbance of human remains.
.
Geology and Soils-impacts to people or structures through exposure to
seismic hazards (faults, ground shaking, liquefaction), soil erosion,
expansive or unstable soils, and septic tanks.
.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials-impacts from use, transport, 'or
disposal of hazardous materials, location on a hazardous site, emission
of hazardous materials, location within a public or private airport area,
interference with an adopted emergency response plan, and wildland
fires. .
.
Hydrology and Water Quality-impacts to water quality and groundwater
supplies, alteration of drainage patterns resulting in erosion or flooding,
increase in run-off, placement of housing or structures in 1 DO-flood
areas, and risk of flooding, seiche, tsunami, or mudflows.
Land Use/Planning-impacts to established communities and conflicts
with land use plans including habitat conservation plans.
. Noise-impacts to people from excessive noise (including construction,
project-generated traffic, and aircraft noise) or groundbome vibration,
and increase in permanent ambient noise levels.
. Population/Housing-impacts through substantial increases in .
population, loss of housing, and displacement of people. .
Gateway BUSiness Park Master Plan Project
Page 4
City of South San Francisco
October 22, 2008
.
Public Services and Recreation-impacts associated with the need for
new'government facilities to serve the project including fire and police
protection or other public facilities.
.
Transportation/Traffic-im'pacts to intersection and roadway Level of
Service, change in air traffic patterns, hazardous roadways, inadequate
emergency access, inadequate parking, or conflict with alternative
transportation policies. .
.
Utilities and Service Systems-impacts associated with the need for
new utilities to serve the project including wastewater treatment, water
supply, storm drainage, and solid waste.
No agricultural or mineral resources are located on the site; therefore, agricultural and
mineral resources will not be addressed in the EIR.
. Alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR will be defined based on their potential to reduce or
eliminate significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The
specific alternatives to be evaluated in the EIR may include, but are not limited to, the "No
Project" alternative as required by CEQA and a reduced development alternative.
NOP Notice: The Lead Agency solicits comments regarding the scope and content of the
E1R from all interested parties requesting notice, responsible agencies, agencies with
jurisdiction by law, trustee agencies, and involved agencies. In accordance with the time
limits established by CEQA, please send your response at the earliest possible date, but
no later than thirty days after receipt of this notice.
Please send your writtenltyped comments (including a name, telephone number, and
contact information) to the following:
City of South San Francisco Planning Division, Department of Economic
Development
ATNN: Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator
P,O. Box 711, South San Francisco, CA 94083
(650) 877-8535
(650) 829-6639 (Fax)
Or via email to:mike.lappen@ssf.net.
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS ON
THE SCOPE OF THE EIR TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED
IN THE EIR.
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 5
City of South San Franc'
October 22, 2008
For additional information, please contact Mike Lappen at (650) 877-8535.
Date:
!f-7LO?
Mi~hael Lappen
Economic Development Coordinator
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project
Page 6
.il';I:'''-oI'I-, "., .,'~." I. .,.! .:l:'~ "I;;l{;'~'~:, :".
..~..--~.. '~'._----'-- ',~"","''''h'I'
,- .. -., a,.- '.,., " """\..,,.
'\t::.,'\:~4'? ....PlIl..~ " ., ". ':--"::;I~'~'
,-,:.,- -'.~~;;.:~~ ':--,~'.~-:':'::/-::t:(. ,'-"~~~~:~~i~':' \'.,'\"'
l'-~"f~l3.,."",io.t.....-:.,~;; "~" ,<>\' . ')>!!oot ,j-
.,cc,,~" -.' .' .".,c" -'''''fr.- .l'",~. "\
'I.? '1' ',' ,.,\f;"',,' ~ " ---oq_.~- -..,',' ' , .
.<~.~ ,," )i~~:'~';:' 'ii~~)~l).~~:;. ". .
.. ":;;::~qt~_. ~~'J' ~Jlgj{ ',$~.~ .~
,~!~"~~j~i ,;f,;. ;'i\,:"'::,:. "'~-~',"
"';1;>#, ,.. ,'if",:;'#;. .. 1;'1.' ',..."
~lf.r~~,1Ili'?J~lllf,it~~~~ _.,.~li_\' ". .
~~~ -~~#' :~"'/~r. .~~"!-'-'--:;
'-
"
"
'I:
::1
"
{' "'I S1I.~!l""J
_ l ."l. _ _. ,~.RrI.'- ~.. ~._.._~.;~~~
~ d I II.TIi,IJ,"
'. leaen Ii
f __ Project Site Boundary 4~"'-ji: ,'_"" '''__''.
~'~~triF: ~SRI Sretrnap, $~.G~t~~~~~~~S$~C,I~,t~S~:
Feet
o
Figure 1
Gateway Business Park Master Plan
Regional & Project Location
IIIiiiiiiiII CHRISTOPHER A. JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES
Environmental Planning and Research
0,
500
1,000 1,500 2,000
~ rfJ
N Q)e.ll>.
OJ-rfJ
~rfJ~
:;Jm-,
O)~'O
.- c:
LL~ro
m...J
n..
rfJ C
<IJ .-
<I>"g
.S ::J
<IJ 0
::> t:
CD:::l
>,00
mo/S
;;:
OJ{3
- OJ
m.~
Cge
n..
C
m
n..
g
~
a
a
~
.
.
a '=-
a .
m ]j
U)
~
a
....-....."
~,
<':>C
<Il~
30..
.2J Q5
u.w
(\J
::2:
..>::
'-
(\J
0..
tJl
CI)
<D
c
'in
:J
[Q
>-
(\J
3:
<1)
-
(\J
t9
!!
~
- i
.
e
VI
W
!;j:
u..c:
O~
VI'"
VI<Il
<t:ll
o/jll::
:r:--g
0..'"
W01
VI<:
.; 0'-
,<:
c <:
0 .",
'" <(-
v; CL
..", 0:::_
>- W'"
0 I+-'
" 0..16
.,;
m f2~
.12
0
g ~e
0 0:::'-
'" I>
c uJi
'i:
m
.0
E
0 I
-"
()
;,;
~ ,1
~
0
OJ
-.'r
e
..
Q
~
C
,
Q
m
1
c
o
ii:
~
"g
~
~
"
~
,,;
=~- Ern
J
.$:I
Ui
tl
Q)
"e-
o..
"<tl::
<ll Cll
~"~
Cl<ll
i.J....1II
U
~
ll.
..c
~
--a
I::
("0
'("0
~
<ll
III
("0
..c:
ll.
'"
g
'"
<0
'"
m
~
"
..,
.;
m
10
'u
o
~
~
<(
,=
~
-"
E
'"
-'=
r.)
Vl
W
!;j:
-.1::
Uu
Oro
Vlw
Vl",
<l:w
~O::::
'lJ
Ic
c...ro
Wrn
Vlc
O'c
"""c
'("0
<l:c...
0::::_
wro
I'E
ll..<ll
OE
1-1::
!!!e
0::::'-
Ii::
Uw
I
~
"
o
'"
IlL oy. \.A-\L I nl-\l'lO 1 nl-\I'l.arun 11-\ 11.U r Lf-\I'lI'll.lI'l\.J, :J 1 U LOO :J:JOU,
U\;L-..:JU-UO 1;.:10111/1,
idye I{.:I
~ ^ Th Ofl CALlFORNrA~USINF.<;S TR^N8~RTA nON AND,:Ht~nsING MiEN'("V
ARNOLD.!il.CRWAR~GGFR.. C.UV~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
III GRAND AVENUE
P. O. BOX 23660
OAKLAND. CA 94623.0660
PHONE (510) 622-5491
FAX (510) 286-5559
TTY 711
.
Flu your power.'
lJi! enE'-gy ftfJki~nrl
October 30, 2008
SMlOl445
SM-101-22.71
SCH#2008062059
Mr. Mike Lappen
Department of Economic Devclopment
City of South San Francisco
315 Maple Avenue
P.O. Box 711
South San Francisco, CA 94083
Dear Mr. Lappen:
GA TEWA Y BUSINESS PARKMASTER PLAN PROJECT - UPDATED NOTICE OF
PREPARATION
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Department) in the early
stages of the environmental review process fot the Gateway Business Park Master Plan project.
The following comments are based on the updated Notice of Preparation. As the lead agency,
the City of South San Francisco is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed
improvements to state highways. The project's fair share contribution, financing, scheduling,
implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all
proposed mitigation measures. Required roadway improvements should be completed prior to
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Since an encroachment pennit is required for workin
the state right of way (ROW), and the Department will not issue a permit until our concerns are
adequately addres&ed, we strongly recOlmnend that the City work with both the applicant and
the Department to ensure ,that our concerns are resolved during the CEQA process, and in any
case prior to submittal of a penrtitapplication. Further comments wl1J be provided during the
encroachment permit process; see the end of this letter for more infonnationregarding
encroachment permits.
TraffU: Impact Analysis
Please include the information detailed below in the Traffic Study to ensure that project-related
impacts to State roadway faciliti\llsare thoroughly assessed. We encourage the City to coordinate:
preparation of the study with oUT6ft1ce, and we would appreciate the opportunity to review the
scope of work. The: Department's "Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" should
be reviewed prior to initiating any traffic analysis for the project; it is available at the following
website: htlp:flwww.dot.ca.!!ovfl1q/tratiopSldevelopserv/ojJCrationaIS\lstel1ls!reoonsltisll"ide.wI
"CaltrWr.." improvrs mobility a("fos$ Califcf/1.UJ"
-.J' -..-....".-
".. ~~ '............."....., ~,'-' .........'-' .........'-IV,
'.U..J' '0',
, "'':de; c-/ u
Mr. Mike Lappen
October 30,2008
Page 2
The Traffic Study should include:
1. Site plan clearly showing project access in relation to nearby state roadways. Ingress and
egress for all project components should be clearly identifIed. State right-of-way (ROW)
should be clearly identified.
2. Project-related trip ,generation, distribution, and assignment. The assumptions and
methodologies used to develop this information should be detailed in the study, and should
be supported with appropriate documentation.
3. Average Daily Traffic, AM and PM peak hour volumes and levels of service (LOS) on all
significantly affected roadways;inc1uding crossroads and controlled intersections for
existing, ellisting plus project, cumulative and cumulative plus project scenarios. Calculation
of cumulative traffic volumes should consider all traffic-generating developments, both
existing and future, that would,a:Ffect study area roadways_and intersections. The analysis
should clearly identify the project's contribution to area traffic and degradation to existing
and cumulative levels of serVice.' Lastly, the Department's LOS threshold, which is the
tran,ition between LOS C andD, and is expli:lined in detail in the Guide for Traffic Studies,
should be applied to all state facilities.
4. Schematic illustration of traffic conditions including the proJect site and study area roadways,
trip distribution percentages and volumes as well as intersection geometries, i.e., lane
configuratiolls, for the scenarios described above.
5. The project site buHdingpotentiaI as identifiedin the General PIan. The projeot's consistency
with both the Circulation Element of the General Plan and the San Mateo County Congestion
Management Agency's Congestion Management Plan should be evaluated.
6. Mitigation should be,idemif1ed forauy roadway mainline section or intersection with
insufficient capacity to maintain an acceptable LOS with the addition of project-related
and/or cumulative traffic. The project's fail- share contribution,financing, scheduling,
implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should also be fully discussed for
atl proposed mitigation measures.
7. Special attention should be given to the following trip-reducingtneasures:
. Enconraging mixed-use,
. Maximizing density through offering bonuses and/or credits,
. Coordinating with saroTrans, Caltl'ain lind BART to increase transit/mil use by expanding
routes and emphasizing express service to regional rail stations, and by providing bus
shelters with seating at any future bus pullouts,
. Provide shuttles from transit to the project,
. Providing transit information to all future project employees and patrons, and
. Encouraging bicyole- aud pedestri an-friendly design.
8. A discussion of any secondary impacts on pedestrians from traffic impact mitigation
measures to be implemented at intersections in the project area. Th,e discussion should
include all feasible measures needed to alleviate or reduce the severity of the secondary
"Caltran... imprmJex moblUly tJCfOS.S Cfllifomw. ,.
- J' -..-.......- .... .,,~, ~",." ~....
'.........'''~''~, .., '"' --......... ...........'-',
,..........,''',
''-'':::1'-' .....,.....
Mr. Mike Lappen
October 30,2008
Page 3
impact so that pedestrian l:lccessbetween the South San Francisco Caltmin station and the
proJect can be maintained not enhanced.
BnCfQDChme:nt Permit
Please be advised that workthatencroaches onto the state ROW requires an vncroachment
permit that is issued bytneDeplUiment- To apply, a completed encroachment permit application,
environmental documentation, and five (5) sets of plans, clearly indicating state ROW, must be
submitted to the address below. Traffic-relaredmitigation measures will be incorporated into the
construction plans during the enproachment permit process. See the following website link for
more information: http://www.dot.ca.gov-/hqJtraffopsfdevelopserv/pennitsJ
Michael Condie, Chief
Office ofPetrnits
CalifbmiaDOT, District 4
P.O. Box 23660
Oakland, CA 94623-0660
Please forward one hardcopy aild one CD ofthe draft environmental impact report (DEIR),
along with the Traffic, Study, inCluding Technical Appendices, and staff report to the address
below as soon as they are available.
Sandra FiI1.egan, Transportation Planner
Community Planning Office, Mail Station IOD
'California DOT,District 4
P.o. Box 23660
, Oakland, CA 94623c0660
Please feel free to call orelilailSandi"a Finega,n of my staff at (510) 622-1644 or
sandra finegan@doLca.lZav with any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
L~~
LISA CARBONI
District Branch Chief
Local Development - Intilrgovernmental Review
c: Slate Clearinghouse
"CultraRS improves mobility ar.l'tJs~ Califomia.'
~.IArE Uf'CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS - M.S.#40
1120 N STREET
P. O. BOX 942873
SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001
PHONE (916) 654-4959
FAX (916) 653-9531
TTY 711
RBCEIVED
@.
. '.
:a
NOV 1 4 2008
Flexyour power!
Be energy effident!
E & CDDEP'I:
Mr. Mike Lappen
City of South San Francisco
P.O. Box 711
South San Francisco, CA 94083
November 10, 2008
Dear Mr. Lappen:
City of South San Francisco's Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the
Gateway Business Park master Plan Project; SCH# 2008062059
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Aeronautics (Division), reviewed
the above-referenced document with respect to airport-related noise and safety impacts and regional
aviation land use planning issues pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
Division has technical expertise in the areas of airport operations safety, noise and airport land use
compatibility. We are a funding agency for airport projects and we have permit authority for public-
use and special-use airports and heliports.
The proposal is for the construction of five to six new office buildings and two to four parking
structures. The project site is located approximately 10,140 feet north of the approach end to San
Francisco International Airport's Runway 1OL.
Public Utilities Code Section 21659 prohibits structural hazards near airports. Depending on structural
height and in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation, Part 77 "Objects Affecting Navigable
Airspace" a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460-1) may be required by the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). A copy of Form 7460-1 is available on-line at
https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaaJexternaI/portal.jsp and should be submitted electronically to the FAA.
These comments reflect the areas of concern to the Division with respect to airport-related noise and
safety impacts and regional airport land use planning issues. We advise you to contact our Caltrans
District 4 office concerning surface transportation issues.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have any questions,
please call me at (916) 654-5314.
Sincerel y,
, <<Sc-'l'\Q"--' .;Jza v~
SANDYCHESNARD
Aviation Environmental Specialist
c: State Clearinghouse, San Francisco International Airport, San Mateo County ALUC
"Caltralls improves mobility across Califomia"
e
,,\ I
.:~
~
-
Linda S. Adams
Secretary for
:nvironmental Protection
Maureen F. Gorsen, Director
700 Heinz Avenue
Berkeley, California 94710-2721
-....
:' :''''. .
~~...'~
. 'n'"''
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Govemor
November 18, 2008
RECEIVED
NOV 2 02008
Mr. Mike Lappen
City of South San Francisco
P.O Box 711
South San Francisco, California 94083
E Pr C!' };EPI
Dear Mr. Lappen:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the
Gateway Business Park Master Plan Project draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(SCH #2008062059). As you may be aware, the California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) oversees the cleanup of sites where hazardous substances
have been released and regulates hazardous waste pursuant to the California Health
and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapters 6,5 and 6.8. As a potential Responsible
Agency, DTSC is submitting comments to ensure that the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) documentation prepared for this project adequately addresses any
management of hazardous wastes and remediation of hazardous substance releases
that rnay be necessary. DTSC has the follOWing comments on the NOP:
1) The EIR should provide historical background information for the site; the EIR should
discuss whether there were any past uses of the project site where hazardous materials
were used, stored, or handled and whether any releases may have occurred. For
example, lead-based paint may have been released into soil from buildings currently at
the site. DTSC recommends sampling if it is possible that any past releases of
hazardous substances may have occurred on the project site. Based on sampling
results, appropriate rernedial measures can be included as part of the project and
analyzed in the EIR. If there has been any previous cleanup of hazardous substances
releases on the project site, please include a discussion in the EIR of the contamination
that existed, the cleanup measures that were implemented, and any regulatory agency
oversight that occurred.
2) According to the project characteristics section, demolition of existing buildings at the
project site is planned. Because, most likely, the buildings were built prior to 1980, they
may contain lead-based paint and asbestos. Lead-based paint and asbestos that are
present in buildings may need to be handled as hazardous waste. The procedures that
will be followed to ensure that any lead-based paint or asbestos is properly identified,
@ Printed on Recycled Paper
Mr. Mike Lappen
November 18, 2008
Page 2
handled, and disposed should be included in the EIR. Enclosed is a fact sheet on
managing asbestos waste and naturally-occurring asbestos.
Please contact me at (510) 540-3842 if you have any questions. Thank you in advance
for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jacinto Soto
Project Manager
Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Berkeley Office
Enclosures
cc: without enclosures
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, California 95812-3044
Guenther Moskat
CEQA Tracking Center
Department of Toxic Substances Control
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, California 95812-0806
\. \ I
Managing Asbestos Waste :~
...............
-
OtMrn,lOOGrTC:~1C
~u.nMm Uilin.O!l.
INTRODUCTION
The Public and Business Liaisons of the Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) prepared this fact sheet to provide general information about the
hazardous waste requirements associated with generating, transporting and
disposing of asbestos waste. In addition, several other sources of information
about asbestos and asbestos handling appear at the end of the fact sheet.
Throughout this fact sheet are citations from Title 22, California Code of
Regulations (Cal. Code Reg., title 22), the California Health and Safety Code
(Health and Safe. Code). There are also citations from the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR): Title 29 for Department of Labor, Title 40 for EPA (RCRA),
and Title 49 for Department of Transportation. Clicking on the section number
links will take you to internet sites containing tllOse regulations. If you generate
hazardous waste, you should consult with your Certified Unified Program Agency
(CUP A). Finally, DTSC strongly encourages all businesses generating hazardous
waste to consider waste minimization, source reduction and pollution prevention.
Go to the Duty Officer F AQs for useful links.
What is asbestos and how dangerous is it?
Asbestos refers to a family of fibrous minerals found all over world and in the
serpentine rock that occurs throughout California. When the fibers break off and
become airborne, they can create a health risk if inhaled. Asbestos exposure is
associated with certain types of lung cancer, and long time occupational exposure
can also cause the lung disease asbestosis. Read more about the health risks of
asbestos in the DTSC fact sheet What is Asbestos and the California Department of
Health Services .publication Asbestos in the Home and Workplace. In the
past, asbestoswas used in many household products and building materials because
of its heat-resistant and structural properties. As a result, building remodeling
and demolition projects produce much of the asbestos waste we see today. DTSC
regulates the packaging, onsite accumulation, transportation, and disposal of asbestos
when it isa hazardous waste, as defined below. Other agencies, listed at the end of
this factsheet, regulate asbestos abatement, as well as activities related to
naturally-occurring asbestos.
Do I have to manage asbestos as a hazardous waste?
DTSC classifies asbestos-containing material as hazardous waste if it is "friable"
and contains one percent (1.0%) or more asbestos as hazardous waste.
The energy Challenge facing California is real. EvelY Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption.
For a list of simple ways you can reduce demands and cut your energy costs, see our website at WWW.dtsc.ca.ODV.
A friable waste is one that can be reduced to
a powder or dust under hand pressure when
dry. This classification standard is given in
California Code of Regulations. section
66261.24. Because the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
EP A) does not regulate asbestos as
hazardous waste under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), it
is considered to be a "non-RCRA," or
"California-only" hazardous waste. However,
various state and federal regulations address
other aspects of asbestos management, such
as asbestos abatement (see the references to
other agencies at the end of this fact sheet).
DTSC considers non-friable asbestos-
containing waste to be nonhazardous
regardless of its asbestos content, so it is not
subject to regulation under Title 22, Division
4.5, of the California Code of Regulations. Again,
other regulatory agencies operating under
separate authority have their own requirements
or restrictions.
How do I determine whether my
asbestos waste must be handled
as a hazardous waste?
If you are not certain whether your asbestos
waste is hazardous, you must have it tested
(CaI. Code Regs., title 22, section
(66262.11(b)(2)) by a laboratory certified by
the California Department of Health
Services, Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Program. The lab will
determine the percentage of asbestos
in the material. Check in the phone book for
"Laboratories, Analytical" or "Asbestos
Abatement and Removal Services." Your
local Air Quality Managemcnt District or Air
Pollution Control District may also have a
list oflaboratories in your area. The cost for
bulk asbestos testing varies significantly,
depending primarily on the analytical
Page 2
'.
method used, the type of sampling that is
required and who collects the samples.
How must hazardous waste
asbestos be packaged?
Asbestos is an airborne hazard, so the rules
and regulations that describe the proper
handling and packaging of asbestos are
found in Federal and State air quality
regulations. The packaging required by
those regulations satisfies t110se of DTSC.
Check with your local air pollution control
district to see if there are additional
packaging requirements for your region.
At a minimum, you must contain and
transport it in one of the following ways:
In sealed, leal( -tight, non-returnable
containers (e.g., plastic bags of at least 6-
mil thicImess, cartons, drums, or cans)
from which the fibers cannot escape.
Additionally, you must wet the wastes to
prevent fibers from blowing around in
the event that the container is broken,
40CFR 61.150 Or
F or bulk waste that will not fit into such
containers without additional breakiug,
wet it to prevent blowing of fibers in case
the wrapping is broken, then wrap it so it
will be leak-tight and seal it with
packaging or duct tape. If you are placing
the wrapped and sealed waste directly in
trailers or drop-boxes, you need to line
the container with plastic sheeting and
covered it with a tarp. (Ca1. Code Regs.,
title 13. section 66263.23.)
Wetting asbestos waste does not constitute
treatment, so you do not need to obtain
special authorization to do so.
How do I label the properly
packaged asbestos?
Each asbestos package or container must
have a caution label affixed to the outside.
That label must be conspicuous and contain
legible lettering that spells the following
warning: (29 C.P.R. ~191O.1001 (;)(2) and
1926. 110Hk)(8), and CaI. Code Reg.. title 8.
~ 5208(i)(5)).
Danger
Contains Asbestos Fibers
Avoid Creating Dust
Cancer and Lung Disease Hazard
In addition to this warning requirement,
California Code of Regulations. title 22.
section 66262.32 requires that hazardous
waste containers with a capacity of 11 0
gallons or less be marked with the following
words and information in accordance with
the requirements of 49 Code of Federal
Regulations section 172.304:
Hazardous Waste - State and Federal Law
Prohibit Improper Disposal. Iffound, contact
the nearest pOlice or public safety authority or
the California Department of Toxic Substances
Control.
Generator's Name
Address
Manifest Document Number
Are there different requirements
for transporting different
amounts of hazardous asbestos
waste?
Yes. If you have more than 50 pounds of any
hazardous waste, including asbestos, you
Page 3
must use a registered hazardous waste
transporter to take the wastes to a permitted
treatment, storage, or disposal facility and
the waste must be accompanied by a
hazardous waste manifest (shipping paper).
Persons who transport less than 50 pounds of
household hazardous waste to a household
hazardous waste collection event or disposal
facility may do so in any safe manner.
Businesses may transport less than 50
pounds of hazardous waste to a permitted
facility if they meet all of the following
conditions: Health and Safety Code section
25163(c)
. You must transport the waste in closed
containers that are packed in a manner
that prevents tipping, spilling, or
breaking during transport.
.
You may not mix
wastes in one
transportation.
different hazardous
container during
. You must haye generated the waste that
you are transporting, your hazardous
waste generation rate is not greater than
100 kilograms (220 pounds) per month,
and you accumulate no more than 1,000
kilograms (2200 pounds) at your
business at anyone time,
Please note that many household
hazardous waste programs do not accept
asbestos waste.. Contact your local
environmental health department to see
whether such service is available in
your community.
In addition, you must place the proper DOT
(U.S. Department of Transportation)
shipping name and identification number on
all hazardous material containers of 110
gallons or less capacity. For asbestos, the
entry is:
RQ, Asbestos, 9, NA2212, III.
This is the same shipping name and
identification number that must appear on
the manifest (if used). For more information
see 49 Code of Federal Regulations section
172.30 1. You are not required to placard
transport vehicles carrying hazardous
materials (such as asbestos wastes) which are
classed as "Other Regulated Material"
(ORM).
For further information regarding DOT
requirements, visit its website; the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Guides
are particularly useful. Or contact the
U.S. Depaliment of Transportation, Oflice of
Motor Carrier Safety at:
Northern California - (916) 498-5050,
Sacramento
Southern California - (909) 653-2299,
Moreno Valley
The Motor Carrier Safety Unit of the
California Highway Patrol Office nearest
you also has information (see the State
Government section of white pages in your
local telephone directory).
How do I get a California
generator 10 number?
The DTSC Fact Sheet, "EPA Identification
Numbers," tells you about both federal (U. S.
EP A) and state ill numbers. If you do not
routinely generate hazardous waste, but are
generating hazardous waste (including
asbestos) as a result of remodeling or
asbestos abatement work, you can get a one-
time temporary ill number. Asbestos wastes
that have been generated by residential
renovation can use a special number. An ill
number can be assigned over the telephone;
contact DTSC's Generator Information
Services Section at (800) 618-6942 (or
6ITOXIC), or at (916) 255-1136.
Page 4
Are there special disposal
requirements for asbestos?
Yes. As mentioned previously, wetting and
double bagging is required for many types of
asbestos waste. Asbestos wastes must be
handled and disposed of in accordance with
the federal Toxic Substances Control Act,
40 CFR 763 Other applicable laws and
regulations include the Clean Air Act
(NESHAP) and California Code of
Regulations, title 22, division 4.5 The
U.S. EP A website has a number of references to
asbestos disposal requirements.
A landfill must be authorized to accept
asbestos wastes by its Regional Water
Quality Control Board. Many municipal
landfills and demolition debris landfills are
permitted to accept asbestos wastes. Call
your Regional Board to see if they have a list
of the asbestos-accepting landfills in your
area. Your local Air Quality Management
District may also have a list. Before you
take asbestos to a landfill, call them to find
out whether you need an appointment or
whether they have any special requirements.
Is LOR notification is required
for out-of-state shipments of
non-RCRA waste such as
asbestos-containing wastes?
Generators that are using a one-time
residential or 90-day provisional EP A ill
number for asbestos waste disposal are not
required to submit land disposal restriction
(LDR) notifications and certifications. Other
generators of friable asbestos waste who
have handled and packaged their waste for
disposal are required to submit California
land disposal notification and certification
per Califomia Code of Regulations, title 22.
section 66268.7(a)(1I).
If you have further questions regarding LDR
requirements for asbestos waste, feel free to
contact your DTSC Public and Business
Liaison.
Do I have to pay the state a
special fee to dispose of
asbestos wastes?
The disposal facility pays the fee if the
generator disposes of 500 pounds or less of
hazardous waste during the year. Generators
who dispose of more than 500 pounds of
waste per year to land pay a quarterly or
semi-annual Hazardous Waste Control
Account (HWCA) land disposal fee.
If the disposal involves more than 500
pounds, the manifest should include the
generator's Board of Equalization taxpayer
number (listed in Section "B" of the
manifest, i.e., under State required items in
the shaded portion). A Board of
Equalization taxpayer number can be
obtained from the Board by calling (800)
400-7115, (916) 322-9534. Additional
information on current hazardous waste fees
and taxes can be obtained from the Board of
Equalization at these same numbers, or from
the DTSC at (916) 322-8676.
Finally, California law imposes a fee on
generators of five tons or more of hazardous
waste per site per year, regardless of
disposition. The fee is payable by the
generator, who is billed annually by the
Board of Equalization.
Are there other agencies that
regulate asbestos activities?
Yes. Some key agencies are listed below:
Page 5
. Contractors State License Board
Asbestos removal and abatement
contractors must be certified by the
Board under Business and Professions
Code Section 7058.5. California law
prohibits any person from advertising
asbestos removal services unless so
certified and requires that ads include the
contractor's certification and Cal/OSHA
registration numbers.
For further information on the
certification requirement, steps to take
when contracting with a company to
remove asbestos, existing laws and
regulations pertaining to asbestos-related
work in California, basic health
information, or to obtain a list of certified
contractors, call the Board at (800) 321-
CSLB or visit its website
(www.cslb.ca.gov). Two publications
useful in these respects are available
online: "What You Should Know Before
You Hire a Contractor" and
"A Consumer's Guide To Asbestos".
. Department of Industrial Relations.
Division of Occupational Safety and
Health (Cal/OSHA)
For information and questions pertaining
to worker health and safety at work sites,
employees should contact their local
CallOSHA Enforcement office, and
employers should contact a Cal/OSHA
Consultation office to provide assistance
concerning occupational health and
safety standards. For locations of the
nearest office, see the state government
section in the white pages of your
telephone directory or visit the web site.
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/doshl.hlm1
Labor Code Section 6501.5 requires any
contractor who does asbestos abatement
to register with Cal/OSHA's Asbestos
Contractor Registration Unit before
doing any work involving asbestos.
Information can be obtained through the
Website
httl):/ /www.dir.ca.gov/DOSH/ACRU/AC
RUhome.htm or by calling (415) 703-
5191.
Business and Professions Code Section
7180 et seq. requires any individual
performing asbestos consulting activities
in California to be certified by
Cal/OSHA's Asbestos Consultant
Certification Unit. Information can be
obtained through the Website
http://www.dir.ca. gov/Databases/ doshc ac
csst/caccsst Ouerv l.I-ITML or by
calling (916) 574-2993.
.
Local Air Pollution Control District or
Air Quality Mauagement District
Many Districts have authority to enforce
the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP),
which include asbestos. In addition,
those local agencies have special
notification requirements when asbestos
demolition or renovation operations are
undertaken. Some of these agencies
charge a fee. Telephone numbers will
usually be found in the "County" listings
in the government section of your local
director's white pages. Also check for
"Local Air District" in the "Local
Contacts" list on the DTSC website.
.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agencv
(EPA) Asbestos Home Pal!e
EP A has notification requirements
pertaining to asbestos demolition and
renovation operations, Call Bob Trotter
(415) 972-3989, for further information
regarding NESHAP compliance and for
information regarding asbestos
identification, health effects, abatement
options, analytical techniques,
Page 6
monitoring, asbestos m schools, and
contact documents.
Other sources of information
and assistance include:
.
Agencv for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registrv (ATSDR) - This
Federal Agency has information and
guidance relating to asbestos and many
other hazardous substances.
.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Wasllington, D.C. (800) 638-2772. They
have information about identifying and
abating asbestos hazards in the home.
Information on asbestos in certain
consumer products is also available.
. Cal/EPA Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment (OElmA)
For information about the possible health
effects of asbestos and links to other sites,
see the OEHHA Asbestos Fact Sheet.
DTSC Public and Business
Liaisons (Duty Officers)
If you cannot find the answer to your
question in this fact sheet, contact the DTSC
Public and Business Liaisons (Duty
Officers). You can call them at 800-728-
6942, or contact them via the Department of
Toxic Substances Control website -
httl)://www.dtsc.ca.gov - click on "Toxic
Questions?" and follow the Contact a Live
Person! link to the page listing each of the
Duty Officers' e-mail addresses,
DTSC Public and Business Liaisons provide
informal guidance onlv regarding
management of hazardous waste for the
convenience of the public. Such advice is
not binding upon DTSC, nor does it have the
force of law. If you would like a formal
opinion on a matter by DTSC, please contact
the responsible program office directly.
You should also refer to the statutes and
regulations, DTSC Policies and Procedures,
and other formal documents.
If you believe that you have received incorrect
information from a Public and Busines Liaison,
please contact Linda Janssen, Regional Coordinator,
at 510-540-3919.
We also encourage you to complete a
CallEP A Customer Satisfaction survey
h [to: / /www.calepa.ca.goy/about!custsyc.htm
so that we may improve our Public and
Business Liaison Program.
Page 7
APPENDIX B
GATEWAY PRECISE AND l\IASTER PLAN
(f)
w
!;:
()
o
(f)
(f)
<(
Z
...J
0:::
W
CO
::2:
<(
I
()
~
0:: 0
<( '"
11. ;;
(/) ~
(/) ::>
W z o~
z5lD~
(/) a. ::c ~
::)~$:w8'
00-
01-00
>- w <i-
<("'''~
::> a. O[
>..... Oz
W w "'~
t-U)06:1:
$: :1: :i\ a
~a..C:Orn
I I
! ;;l I
! II! II ! ill "
, Hll I ~ - "
s~l "ill ! !ill l!~! ! .
jl!'..i~""!!i!I"'I!!!~!l!.i
i! ~~III~i!lllj,III!:ii;;III~
~
o
~
"
z
~
o
O~aO~2b8o~::~:~=:::~~~~~~~~~~
~
<?i
"
z
5
~
:;
'"
...
~
'"
o [
I ; !
I I ,
.2,1
I ' t} t'
! ! I ~
I H'.
. ,
i it :
f 11 t' t' A r;;
!~~7l:
1 ! i I
I ~ t I d
Ii I ~! ..
..~
i
'-I.' ! I
1 ' 11 .
11 I
I . I
II -
I: I ' '. ,
. !
I 'I
! i
I I
I l I
!
!
~
~
j
i
I
~
,-
~
~
i
~
~ -
- I
~ 2
~ i
Ii
II, ,
J!l!l
Ml;
.,/."
:u:.rL~
, .
j, l
'j'l
,l,ll,
i.jlli;
r~ , ..
t~~~
h'l';'
"_ {~e
I,
Ii!.
€!,gj
:=,;;Us~
'!I'r
1..-1
mh!
6
~
z
o
u
b
w
~
..
1
I
, !
;
I I
Ela.. .-
i111i!
~~;::,:.
wi!!
.-I!J
r:,i
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
I-
W
W
::I:
en
a:
w
>
o
u
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
>
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
gs <~:ll:3
co <,:)0..<<>0
N
~
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
"J'
=s ~~
::.~
-,
=~
;"...
If,J'I'V;..
JI · l C ,',%-. "
/'1' :I\~... ,,~
r" H,,; ~>A~
" I ~ \ \.'!.{ '~'.'A
1 p",!; , \\\.
l'.... I,." " '~~ ~
f : 11 "'. '\ ''\\, <,:', }\"., ' , :", .,
~.: "I' .j \.., ~~",\" \, "';}, 0., ~
c j 1\ ~ "'- \'\,,\ ''''., ,
'I l'll . ~~ "" ,.\ "$\\ \ '\\.
I, 1\" . 9, - t '\ \\ .\
,~i , ,~ . L.J ~ ,/;'\'\\\ ,,\ .
1\ ~ ~ tl~ -\"0~" \~~'"
I, "j: g l.j I ,"~.; ',<'"
t . ~ . I! ~~ l~ "': \. '. '
V ;,; 31 c, '" '\ '~"'"
?"J:.1 I, _ dP' '~~ '_.J~' ~~,'. '''::.' '(
Il./' '--- ,-=--- ',' ~ ~ ' ""ill. \:.' ,. ,\
- . ",! · "',. 'I) S"'"
0( . . _\ ~'~ ' "'\'
=""II~ :, a. '!'Qi' " " \~
-I,~.. d ,. ': "~" ',.,\ ,
I fl' ~ l ~. 1i1 '- "'::';;!t~ 1,';:%,. "
"ll ~ ~ "1'.. " 't:t~,.> '\.
I W g , 9'1 t. I r 1 ~~:~ "', ,.
I tl- I ;,; I ';,w" ~,\~<! ~. _ 'I'r " >.~
,., ''''.. "'''~., '" ,
II' ';' ~""~~, 'I~.:~~w::;~'- ",' '..
"" . =~",;,.,U.., >>"-=-",,,.' 'e~
I 'CT 'C_'.~'if""."" ,_^" ~ ~))." " "'; , .
" \111, !i:;it{:ti?Cft,.~~ :i!~~' r . J;'~(cir~"" 't, \~"
,\ '~ '~" 'ikl-'\ u liJi~' Ie 12'hf. ~ ' ~. ,,~'-.' ~
I I~ " jl'!i .11~4 i-~! lrl h' f~i~t~ . ~. -iiii U~.'" ~ ~ ,i* ~., ~ "
. , ~","~. .," ~ ,. "~~;, "" " ''-'''''' 0":., ·
'f "c4~., I "II < "~; 'ldl -'.,11 ,., I, 'lY#.,.. """,
i :' 1,1 ,\:" ,i>l:~:!l:i'.".",,; ..';;ill\, I' 'i~!~'-i-w~~;("~, ~;~,~ ,
II' loiI~I' ",,,,',", ~ '. . ''''', '~'Il",' "'co 'l' \",
J I 'i'I._ "' ~'';;;." _ I .....~" '''',>-~. ~/ / ~ .~ "-
- '1. \ .~., -= 'l'L'~",- '.'.. ~_ A,~""" '''',~, '. ,!,. ,< .",~"';;
, .~ ---, """"'-~-* ';;', "<"-"i/ ~'l' "8.J";) ''.-.
~' 'If-j""-- ""'Cv':i";'<",,,-,,~~ 3/y'+!P! ~~ ~ " "{/'.~' ,_
I . '. n-~n-_c ". . ". ',' , . "',," ."
'., n, .. , ,', " "'" < I
' , "'n_ ~, I__~,_, · "',~. ./ , '" a, '"
' ,I't ,,' '. "'" '. '.. , ,."'. ,J 'V .,~
''\0 ~1H~111~ ;'i '\.4:-;::", ':'/'~:'l--Ir"',p .
' 'I, II, I" <0, ", """" '..
." , , ...., ',", ", , "
,j I' . ", '-,,, -';V" ',("."
",,1'..., 'f'''':-'''~ ')" "f~,,;~ 11_:
"\". ''''~j.~~;t. ~ ~s::-..;:~ ,~z
" " ,,' v . "'-':"_ " ,
N .... "., ~'x-~.~:"~~~.
..... ~ '.;~;;-.;.~t~'''Il',
I)' 'I '0,. "",
~.~ . ~, " ,\
' "0:."
/"~'"
,
"1-
- I-
I
, J,
"
11'1 :j :.
~ ~"5~ "( ~~
i 11:1 !~ l~
. ii' ,1 !!
' 1 'I"
, 'II l'i .
I ;h' 'I, !~
I '~;i '1\ ~J
I! "" I;! ~lj;
! ~i11 ~i! 11'1
:. -I:;'; ~b: II'
!! ~I;!l! im hi
n ~r~~I::l
"
I'
!
"
.:
~~
"..
"
!.~ -
~ ~
h! ~:
Ii. ~l
II! ~!
,11 ~~
.
~ Ii
l-i d~
~ j~ I
I ~~111!
i I!!lmilm:i
; i 111:.....
::: I....~z
, I
I,
I'
, I
!
d
i I
, "
! '\, '\
",. ........ 1
!ii~ -~..... l......._
\,<: ' .,
. ;f\t,- j ,;-~ ~ "~-,
. (~!\":j 1
.~~ <c.~,/ "'i I
'\~~ ':,~-- ......
, 'U',..l '-_ 't
. '!f':_~ ~ .
'If":: ..:t ~'l.=;;'1, '
~frf:; ;,' ~-'14~' "l! ,.aiJ.;)'
f_.,,,,~,, '
irjI....-:Ajj~...l ,l:';;{" "'_
,;~~....U 'I.~\~,f:~'
't,.
0.1
-<,
:11,
>-I~
1::,'
Zllt
QI
>,
NI!I
r. ::=
~!ICQ
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
>-
a:
<C
c
Z
:::l
o
a:l
C
a:
o
u
w
a:
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
~ 0
Jl. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
co <~:ll:3
:5 <,:)0..<<>0
N
~:J' =s i~
-,
CJ -<',
=:l ;"...
..
'f . ~~
'- '.-
.:\...~~
; i
I'
,
....,'I-ilo
I
. ,
'. .
,
.,
"
.
\
~
~
,
! n ~
"',~.
!!
l'
,.
I, 11 II
!- " I
:~ tii 'II!
I. I! ,I
illl ;:
;:j'!il ~:!
I! I'! .1 ~
Ill!!!! iii,
!i'! I II!
li!'~' ~ 1I
:.,:h ~m
~
o
z
"
.
o
.
D
_,._I_.,.__L.___ _. rl I
~ . ~''i.G'),1J.,_~.._1
~', . ,: I
,-'~ - -........ "w"i :-,:'''-'- -';
ILl,. .-'~, .-;.1 --.:
I
~
"
o
.
~
,
.
=-
l-
ii
~ I :c I
o ~
I \ If- ~Y "'I
, \ If I ..: I [I
I ~.i j: 1 P ~J l1- fl
bn-----c-.-.-::J- cf L ..."
~.,~.~+, 01",11 ~....~I; --..;:~
I
II,
r I',....
IIi'
1\.'"
I ~~
111:
itf'f!-,
"'j ~
;;';IJ~
61:.-
,tr-
~,
1.$
,
. ,-
I
,
"
I
,
H
1
~
o
~
~
II
z,:
;. _ IT
r'J
MI!I
[. ::=
..IDCI
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
\
I
>-
W
>
a:
:::len
enZ
>-0
I-i=
:ns
i=z
:::l0
~U
U~
-Z
::I:-
c..1-
<(en
a:X
~W
o
c..
o
I-
,
,
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
.
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" >
'" ~
~5~fi
(I) Il. >-15
::lW<fD
"'~~.
>-~~~
<g:Cli:i
l:_~.
Ww"'z
co I-lIloo!2
co <~:ll:3
~ <,:)0..<<>0
cri
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
.... ~:
~ ~~
;"...
r--r
I
~
2
Q
I;
g
"
~
- -....
it
~~
.
~
.
5lJ
'>
o
.
N
,-
"'lit
"'L
o:rl!l
r.....
~!I.:;
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
en
e
l-
e
::I:
c..
W
I-
Ci5
~
z
i=
en
X
w
o
u
~
"
~
<<
~
2
~
~
~
o
w
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~-
<ca:Cli:i
l:~ .
w:;;~:z
co I-lIloo!2
8 <5~~~
N
cri
N
f---
~ ~
:J
<(
10
11- "
_ 0
, I
, -
:00.2
q,
~,]
s. ~ '"
lq
i 0.--
HI.
1-0;
-~,
~ ~]
".
~~ i
'6~~
-<,
:f;j"
if~
i:;; e
~~i!
. , ,
;...-~~~
::;; ~ i5. <'i:
1]~~
.:s'b,
~d i:~..g
- ~ - ~ ~
~.. 9 lii
l ~ -5:!i ~
..~~>
.~~~~]
a.
, ,
, ,
,
>
,
U
j
Z
"
o
~
.
.
i
<
.
~
~
W
LOI!I
;~
."
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
~~ i
- r
!
~~
z~
z
<C
...J
c..
w
!:::
en
~
z
i=
en
X
w
o
~
"
~
ff
,
~
5
o
w
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
=s ~~
::.~
-,
~~
.....;. ,
',- "~ ~
:11
,
...
z_
~
~
..
~~
~ .".
~
.
. ''A.? " r:
O')~~, ,
, ~"Jl,'
" ,s>(V~'t
-- ~v ..
,-, ;,> X.
'\ ~)'"~
...
l'
,
'~',)
~
ID
:.;
~
o
I
I.
I
I
.
,;.
~
I'.l
'.
.-
tOl!I
r. ::=
~!ICQ
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
a:
w
I-
~
:iE
c
w
en
o
c..
o
a:
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
8 <5~~~
N
~:J' =s i~
-,
CJ -<',
=:l ;"...
<(
,~
,
.
JI,
- .'!II"" ~
.. .
,- "'-<It
f
:r
:~
''''';J
z"
,
'.,r- to
~
~.
, "
,'~' ..~
~
.'
,
I
<
"
1
.
-
'::I$,
-
~I!I
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
~~ i
- r
!
~
z
<c
...J
c..z
e::<c
W...J
I-c..
enw
<Cen
:!E-
u
Ow
We::
enc..
o
c..
o
e::
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
8 <5~~~
N
~:J' =s i~
-,
CJ -<',
=:l ;"...
<(
lX)1!I
~_'A!J.I~
':~ -
. ~. I
~,H
.n ~ I
n~ ." ~... -r
i-i~
iH !
'1' 2J
I" l z~
-.s~
~ ~]
~ ~ ~
~::l!:
~g{j
Z ~ ~
i~~
i";; c
~ L~
~,~
~;; ~ ~
"':!:'i!;..t
~~~i
j~H.i
~ ~ ! ~ 5
-:; ~; li;
i~5~!
,"g..
.~ ~ ~ ,-.
"" ~ .. :!!.f:
~
,
~
j
.
<
,
0:
.
l
.
~
~
~
z
e:(z
...Je:(
e.....J
We..
I-w
Ci5~
~u
zW
-0::
I-e..
en
X
w
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
(I) Il. >-0
::lUJ~fD
lDIIlW~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
:\m\\ i
"J'
=s ~~
::.~
-,
=~
;"...
I
1
i
f
-'
J-
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
1,__-
-~
.s-srl
.----,
1
1
1
1
0- 91:
",',
I
~~
;., ,
./ (" 1
,~, j Ii
-~
""
1
I
1
_,
r....... ~,
of C)!!:!: _ ~
I z 0 a: ff'"g . _,_
;;;:: 0 ;:; I l: :P' '';]'>>'
' :..J-' I- t: =.d,;;.- ..
I -o</) ~ _
__ :J~1tl _.
....Clt...---._ _.
.D-,6t
"
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
"
/'
/ ,
/ .......,
/
,
,
,
"
./......'''.,
/ ,
, "-
,
,
"-
,
,
,
,
,
',.
,
'-.....
,
-.,
-.,
-.,
-.,
-.,
-.,
"-
"^
"
C>>
1m
l:D
r:,i
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
.-
~W
Zen
<C<C
...J::I:
e..e..
Wz
!:::<C
en...J
~e..
ZW
-en
1--
enU
-W
Xc::
We..
00
o
o
N
cri
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
<( ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
(I) Il. >-0
i~~~
u~"
>-w<;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
<~:ll:3
<,:)0..<<>0
"J'
.-- ~~
fW :fr
;"...
~
-g
.
~
>
.
.
10 :,1
~H ~
~ 0. ~ ...
! 1!.~
~=1
u.
Q!~ ,,8
i ! I
!.s;
- .~
i!' = ~
~ ~ ~
~~~
~ g ~
~ii
~~i
"6E):
;:-i5~
~-i i5.~
"'=s:;::
j ~ ~ t .
:ll}~~j
~ l:: - ;I ~
<[.t.e 1-
l ~ ti 1
:;':"'!e..c,.
.~ ':~, J ~
.!:o=.. _
~I!I
r. ::=
~!ICQ
I
~~ i
- r
!
z
<C
...J
c..
W
I-
Ci5
.-
w
en
<C
::I:
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
::lW<fD
"'~~~
>-~~;;
=s ~~
::.~
-,
<,
;"...
jVV~\ /^\\.
'" ( ,..~;~%'
. "\\
" -,;:. ~ 0 ~~
~ \ '. f\) \~"
-" , ~ I '\. "-"~ '\
7 I 'I I .' '~~\.
I I . ., ":.'''"'.
I I ' \~
1\1 I! I I . \.
I : l: I,jc" '~\.
1 : ~ \ 1 .
L' I' -
I I I ..
i :' I: r: "
1'J~I=='
: i I' :
,~ 4f
- 1\- .., C'
il
. 11 I Ii,
~ I! . ~U t it t I
I j !, ~ >If}, I 5' i I
~ r , i < h HI!! i, ~ ~ jl I
<~f t ~ ; ~ ,s! ~~l p tt ~ 3 ~~ O!l
~l .h II n lfd!r1r '!~I'i' ~ [HI
" ' , 'I" - " ,'. "" H
~~ ~h 31. ~ J !.E :sJ~~.3 ~~! c5~
. 8 800 0 @) @) @)@)@) @)
I j
!
i
!
"
:~
,.'
..I)
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
:: I"
r.....
~!I.:;
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
W
c..
<C
U
en
C
z
<C
...J
U
i=
<C
:iE
w
::I:
U
en
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~-
<ca:Cli:i
l:~ .
w:;;~:z
co I-lIloo!2
8 <5~~~
N
cri
N
f---
~ ~
:J
<(
~
\.
t
I' 'I I
I Ii! Il'!! 'll hjl '!!lld
! illllltll1 iHn lill liHln
· . I J ,II ~ ~ II . II
! Ill' .!~ "~'Ii < it! .J pl1lid ~ 'lq1lil! I ili
Il~HihhIHlIHflmj!f bHllBf II1Hhlll WiwllBHll! !
8
f J
Ill, II! i i
IillJHiJ
t I
Ij I j 'I J
i I,lll hll'l'l
lil!ll!l liilillJ
~ ~,>
l:D
r:,i
I
[9'~ i
-. r
!
z
<C
...J
c..
~
z
i=
z
<C
...J
c..
U
!;;:
:iE
w
::I:
U
en
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
gs <~:ll:3
~ <,:)0..<<>0
cri
C\J "-#.
~ =s;~
~ :fr
<( ;"...
. _ .Ir_
.~ . ,."
.'-- .....,1 '1#f:'
. ..
.., "0 -
...,~. ,
r'. ", ....f'
"j" :I ,"Vo ~
J..~'.:h .;,...:'JI'J:i.iri
r..~.~" ~
..., "1" ~~ .
. .;~~ ...,.. 'l".l...LG
iljJ/I/ijl j I . II
IJ)l jllIj J! i HI HI
lliUllll! JlIJhlHilllJ !l!lhlill
}! I. I } I ! ~ 11tll till
d tHI~Ji dHblwHllI HwHllll
~WllliUl IhHdHII
-....,........... ~=!:.':::'~:::'~::!!'~~:;;.: sj~,:~~1!~>t;; :H:j~:II'I'::Olll1\g
~I!I
r.....
~!I.:;
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
W
l-
I-
W
...J
<C
c..
I-
Z
<C
...J
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~-
<ca:Cli:i
l:~ .
w:;;~:z
co I-lIloo!2
8 <5~~~
N
cri
N
f---
~ ~
:J
<(
~
,0
~ :.r..-"
~:3j ~Ci.~~~ZO'.
-';;0
"
~
.
~
"'" I!I
.... ' "
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
[ijJ:;jj I
f
!
t
.
~
J
i
z
l 0
, i=
.I U
w
en
<C
w
a:
<C
>-
a:
I-
z
W
~
Gij f
Q1 0
u
00
"
~
~
,
~
~
~
0
00
"
0: 0
'" ~
"- >
.I '" ~
'" ~
f ~5~~
l 00 Il. >-0
! ::lW<fD
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
00 <~:ll:3
0 <,:)0..<<>0
0
N
cri =s ~~
N
~ f---
, ! <IJ
:J ::."
! -,
CJ ~~
, :J
, <(
,
!
I~
~
.
'"
.".,"
'(
I.
,
~I!I
r. ::=
~!ICQ
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
~
~
"
.
i'
W
0::
:::l
I-
<C
w
LL
...JZ
<Co
0::-
1-1-
zU
WW
ucn
~
<C
~
...J
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
i ~~oo!2
'0 CO <~:ll:3
ij :5 <,:)0..<<>0
o N
I ~ ~ ,
~ ~:J' =s i2
-,
w CJ -<',
b =:l ;....
z <(
o
o
~
~
~
.
g,
~
3
~
~
.
t
.
~
!i
t
i
~
\,;\\
\ \ ,
,\ ,
If',
"~I
., ,'v\
dUI/\'
\
~A\\
" \
, \ '
I ','
III /;0
IIl1l, \'
1',\.~!.I_!, llPH' t
'.' n~!;;! ,
.,1.-, ~"~H. .
N!U lHWn I
.lli;. ~Phi' ~
f;~:tiiJ~ iii;'-S"tj'~! i
$1!~l1' ~~~ii~ii i'
E ri~~~~ JJ~;~~l !
~ HWl H~!Hi f
~ ~l~~~~ lil"ifij :
j! :o:"(;;,,t~ ~"".2~ ~
~ !Hi', !~.;.i.j~ .
] it,.n d.H~ !
~ !,!!,!! !,,,hi. t
~ Hi.,!;i '''lia~1 1
~ ~HtHUi~(m! ;~
,;; :J~~~r~ !i~lJiKI 2~
~
~
~
~
~
~
i
_1
............lII\~
..ti-....................\ ~
....................ti-. ~
..........iJ -
...................... .i
....................tt.
.. .,........,..
_ 0__ ~ .r.
f~
?
~I!I
r.....
~!I.:;
~
~
~
~
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
.
o
o
i
<
~
?
.
0.
?
en
~
Z
::I:
en
z
a:
:::l
LL
W
I-
Ci5
.
o
E
~
!
.
!
o
.
,
^
~
~
"
i
"
~
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~-
<ca:Cli:i
l:~ .
~ w:;;~:z
~ co I-lIloo!2
~ 8 <5~~~
, N
10 cri
'- N
, ti
'" :J
~ CJ
~ :J
~ <(
=s
...,.-1'
I,
~ i
, I
:.........L.... ~
--rr
~~~.
',..
"'+.. 0.1
'II"" '-., ~l
1 "6\ >-11
';I~ '-I'4.~-""" ~,
.~~,.
;-.:;". "
'-'-""-
,
,
I
, I,
-"1-
}, ~
.
':.~
j
f--
1': ,
9,1 I ::
~I' I.
; i r ~~)
. ,
I I ~
, I,~
r ~
. "V
.. <i)//)~
Q -.'"v//
/' 'to... '$.~ /(/
/' .....'4'f'
..? oz. ./
~A-"t?'-EI/
<So... (:
"
;
,
l "li~ !
1!'1' ,
! '!'I"I'
~. II !I! - illilii!!;-,
~MI!l!ilM!!!!!!i!l I
IS:'t:~~::'!i5Iil":'lil~ft;U~~t-~~
1---
,
,
,~
"><>>c~ ~
;",~" ...,...,~
If--
I
'.
o -;;-
o _
"'~~
CJC!~
Z-:r;
-"",
9t:o..
- -<
=> '"
'" -
o
"'
r----, <.:>
z
i5 '1
f-- ~ --j I'
5
[IJ
"", .1
.
ill j
1;
I
I I.
I __i____
l._-;;"-JO~",: /'~
,. )--~
~~..,.... ~'
r 11
.
~...
j
!
~
'I
I: 't
. ,~
o
o
S'
"
Z
15
--'
5
'"
\,
..,
.
0)1
"", .,
e' "
II----"\;!
.
~.~ ~I
,< ~~~ ~I
}-- - -, - "
.",.. -"i'_ _._~
.-
I
\
~-
~
-"7-'
I
'-11' I
I I
I'-
....
I!I
r:,i
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
W
~
<C
z
<C
a:
C
~
~
Z
C
<C
a:
~
8
V>
"
~
<<
~
,
~
5
o
V>
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
(I) Il. >-0
::lUJ~fD
lD~~~
>-w<;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
co <~:ll:3
:5 <,:)0..<<>0
N
cri
N
f---
(f)
=>
CJ
=>
<(
"J'
=s ~~
::.~
-,
=~
;"...
/
\
\
\
\
'z-
- 'f i 0
-, 'II; I
"I ,'..
~ I ~5:w I!i III
~l i1!;
~~! 11 I!
""~J ,. i ,
~l; _! 'I!
~II .. 's,
:; !II'
~I' I.';
Ii ~'lii~1!
~ 1!' ~i V!I
~li ~'II'11
~~ ~ tfi~t i
if! ~~.~~5~
v
'-
'~'... '---.y....,
,
I
~
. 1
o _
"' ;!:
"'~~
,,0",
zo~
-.",
1
I
,I
<I
"-
_:!.k'~''''''~,-,-,
-----
.?'"
....=,
*H
m
,~,
~~
~{ trf
< ,
III--"Wi
.
;.
""'''~ Itl ~
f ....,~_, tI ~ 'ffi __
J-._,....,,___ "~___ ____---;;. ~
-4"" _ _ _ _ _ _~_'" .
---, / ~
I \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L ____
,-----
;-----,
,
I ,
I "
I
: ~
i- I
~!I e
Iii :l !
~m-7,/TjJ
--- ~ /,
~ ~ /1 \,: "
/
co I!I
.... ' "
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
[ijJ:;jj I
f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
W
~
<C
z
<C
a:
c
~
~
z
C
<C
a:
~
,
o
~
"
~
ff
,
~
5
o
w
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
co <~:ll:3
:5 <,:)0..<<>0
N
~
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
=s ~~
::.~
-,
~~
\\ \~ .;
I \(
\.. /
,
l
I
\.
.v.
y
0.'
i~~(. _"" ~I:
~~
~.,
I
.1
-"1-
'I" I'
;' '. I
<I ,'"
~:r ~3..1!' I\. III
ill I! j'
~;! I:!l
~"l' Ill'
~! 'f 8"'1
'I'j II ,I
~ I',
~!j Illli!
~'I ~!l!",
~!, >i'~I!
." 1!~'!'
~ll !..11
~ ~..1!: ~ ..
~'.
\ \
( r
'"
~----"'.
\
:l-!.
,
,
,
\'
\
\
I
1/
"
'i
,
-'
~
.,
\
./
I
\ I
\
..: I,'
I
(
I
".:
\ \
\ \
I
, :e;
-~L
I' ,
-"'.1
'x.,
.'
"
~I
I~
.) t.ff
"
'" ;1
.:1 ')1
,
,
l~..li~,
."
'lli! .
II .
-.T: ...
1 I,
I ~ I ~
~l:! J'~
r'1 :,,,-,,"
t,
- :l
g ~J"
" ,~- ~
Z , T "....,
~ 'w
en o;;j: ~ I \
o -
o ;!
<'>+11- ~
(!J~~ ',#
Z-I
5-<tv) '.
dt~
::> '"
'" -
~I!I
r. ::=
~!ICQ
I
=1
[ijJ:;jj f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
W
~
<C
z
<C
a:
C
~
~
Z
C
<C
a:
~
o
u
00
"
~
ff
,
~
~
~
2
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
::lW<fD
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
8 <5~~~
N
'~ .-- i~
-' fW"'~
~ g~
<(
~I;
",I-
lliil
~(II
i 11- -~l
! r= ,I,
9 I. ',"
~-n"" ~ '.,=1
n__C__.-: '1
~I-::""~-
- L----7
J ~...,
I ~I
'~- 1: : i~
~'J 1 I 1,/
l-ii F) c~ ,~: ~_) j}
I-',ill" ~~ L "", .. '(1:,,1;;1. .L_________~' I
(i'.~~ , '-'-'-;";, \' . ..~ '-' "'-_",,; .~"
"'~F~-,7;1 ~:rr;-- \.. ' "-... r~,>='''''__,\\y',' ,:~,
" -.c "'., I'~"" '.. 'co.,
'--urr ' ~ ' /);..:.:.. . ''>ry
, I, ... '. ~.j, :_,~, "- /.. " 1
-l---.-=--_G _ , __ , " .
- - - - - - t if ,t... ~ :.:;,...... <I., -I :,........
-- ---l- ~
['
'~
~
L
~i Iq
.-r
:=> '." .-
\. -- ,-.- - -
"t1. ".,.,.,.
It=;
IF
l
~1
~
'3 1
~
"'""""
~
o
.
ij
~
"i"'U;i--' ..f;.
I-o,f ...1:
--j; \
'I
1
'-j
':l
?..<--<,.I.
t
~--
'.
.....r
-I
'I. \,
\.
\. ...;.:.
,
;
;
':"
,
~.1 '
-_ i
'-
<'
j
'....
.\
~ "\
I
'1
I
o
~
If-
~
I ,:1::
w:u
~
~j I
o
.
9
~
"---
-"1-
I'
I
I'! "~
, "
, 'I
~" it
II 1I
;~ !i
,I !"
'! ,
:! III
!. ~~~
jl !ll
>~ ~.
~~ ~l~
ii ill
! ~! b~
i _ "
,
"
, ,
.'.-
{\
\,
'''-,
',-
~
o
.
ij
~
,
,f~
~I!I
r:,i
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
z
<C
...J
c..
z
<C
a:
c
:iE
a:
o
I-
en
8
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
~~~2
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
gs <~:ll:3
co <,:)0..<<>0
N
gf /J'
~ ~ ~2
(9 fW fr
~ ;....
i ]
~\
I
w
"
~
~
!
.* 'f '~.1~;R t:
ii~ijj,l'b!;
-
-
""~
....;1:" ,. ':1:1:t~:L
:,1""'1 "I II il ~ i "
1.'1'" ""1'1 I I'
~
~
'3
s
.
-......;:~
f;.,
9
~
~
~
"
~
"
z
91
~,
.
.-
L."
....... ...
<:j""'I 'I
~ 81~ ~I
'I"
r+
'n
g
w
"
z
'3
s
.
'-
1= ~ - ~= =-
-- '--
r
-
u::=
... ... ... : t
1111;1 il k
-
t
-,- 1--
- '- -r-t-t-
,
J;.;;.~
... .........; :,Xb'
.tl",tl " i! lll! 'I <l,~1
'i"l' !I 'I 'j I '",
-
N
>
w
<
3
~,
~~ z-
~z
~~
~~
L:J 98.3-'.
~
NI!I
:~
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
en
z
o
i=
u
w
en
w
I-
Ci5
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
z
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
'" ~
0. >
'" w
'" ~
~5~~
(I) Il. >-0
::lW<fD
"'~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
co <~:ll:3
:5 <,:)0..<<>0
N
~
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
"J'
.-- ~~
fW =~
;"...
I' I
h ~J; .Ii C\l I!I
, ill - C\l
I .-','
...~"
I ~ :~ [.....
'" ~:I.:;
j I
~" I I
~ [ijJ:;jj
.;'- "'~. ~ f
,
I , !
,-
I I
.!' I
I
l
I r ..
.
,;,
I ~
I " ~
I I ~
I ~
.. ~ en
~
Oi Z
I <(
.. l! ...J
h I......,........ c..
.. -. ..
.. ~
:s:
w
, , ,j I-
'....,' ...-." <(
~
f Je 0
, 0
. en
~.
h e
- .
., ..-?-.~
,
,
[I: 'lei e
-... l'>l...
,-r.,---, k l
j ~ III I i 0
.....!J..Lw~_;_ ~ U
rr-'1,...-,;"J 00
"
1I:J}oo>o(r II ~ ~
:: '~..,..\,;. :: <<
" _II: JI ~
p ,...u., n.'1 ~ ,
"",,""-.-I.....c.;.....e',- ~
~:iiJ ,- ~
_n j ;-?"' I ar f ~ " ~
I ~ " ~
0
00
.~ ;+T; ~ "
0:
~ '" 0
i .j ~
" "-
" ~ '" >
~
'" ~
j ~5~~
! ~ (I) Il. >-0
::lW<fD
"'~~~
.. ~ >-~~-
<g:Cli:i
~ l:_~.
w~ z
.. 00 I-lIloo!2
} 0 <~:ll:3
h 1.,........_.... 0 <,:)0..<<>0
. N
.. -.. ~, , .... cri
N =s ~~
'. f---
<IJ
:J
CJ :fr
:J
<( ;"...
M I!I
C\l . "
r- . -
'" 1.1 ~' ,! j! J ,I 1 ...
II ';l [.....
je. II il ~I ,I :~ ~:I':;
, .. . , . . .
" ' , \,5 ,I 1 ,I 1 1
~ iHs !I tl ;1 ~ ~ '1 I
. . . . . I
8
I ,. l~ 1 I [ijJ:;jj f
8 8 88 8 II 1 "1
'8 !
. 1 j
" , ,-
~[3 , \
, 1
l . I
.
[!1
. G
J I
~~ I
G .
, (3
1 .
~[3 I I
, ~ , .-
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ en
~ ~ z
~ 0
i=
<C
>
w
} ...J
,II , \jB ,I 1 ,I " " ~I' ,! )! i ! ! W
,Il!!l tl 11 tl ~ t ~i \1 ~ I
II !I ~l l' , .1 '" >-
. . . + . . . . . . . . . <C
:s:
8 w
II l-
iI <C
Ii il ~
0
0000 0
\ en
, 11
IIi
III
8~E1
I
pi
ill 0
~ ElElEl u
00
El "
8 II ~
"II, <<
~
; III ,
El ~
~
~ BElEl ~
0
El 00
"
0: 0
'" ~
s ~ "-
'" >
~
B ~ '" ~
~ ~5~~
~ ~ (I) Il. >-0
::lW<fD
"'~~~
~ ~ ~~~;;
~~~
II ~ ~ ~-~~
II e a 00 ~~oo!2
0 <5~~~
0
N
8 cri
N
f---
<IJ =s
:J
CJ
:J
<(
"
,
.......".."...,
.
.. I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
-'-
I
I
(.,..,,, ".....
I
. l!
, l
,
.0.-." ,
~ ~
,
I .1
!!
I 11 ,
1 ~j
"
t ,:,1
, ,
I
'.
~-
-. I! i__~:
~ B , ...'" I
--/11 ,-!I t" - J! iii
r -~' $ .m IiJ
-----....._______. III , ,
------------. 11
'"""j..,.
III
~
,
,
,II
" I 'II
~Ql;: r~~.~;r:, ~
t 1l~1 [;;~::j ~I,,~' :~,
I-I! I
flll I III I.b .
~ &:I 14.1
~
r'-'!~
1.-,
'"
'"
"It
1,-,.
'.
,
;
'.W,._...,
"
~.
~
~
~
~
~
i
'j
~
~
e
~ .
.
~
~
, ~
) ., ;
~
~
.
""" I!I
C\l ' "
~....
..11::
:~ ~:ICQ
'" I
[ijJ~ I
f
!
,-
en
z
<(
...J
c..
~
:s:
w
!;;:
~
o
10
co
o
u
00
"
~
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
c:: ~
~ ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
co <~:ll:3
:5 <,:)0..<<>0
N
~
N
f---
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
=s ~~
::.~
-,
~~
~I!I
'"
~....
..11::
~:ICQ
I
~~ i
- r
!
~
~
B
~
en
z
<C
...J
c..
W
~
<C
a:
<C
~
~
~
o
~
~
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
is
00
"
~ 0
0. ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
00 Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~;;
<ea:Clw
~~~~
~~oo!2
8 <5~~~
N
~:J' =s i~
-,
CJ -<',
=:l ;"...
<(
I'- I!I
C\l . "
[.....
.. ~! ~:I.:;
'"'
I
-- I I ~l
iiPi ~i ~i ~i ~i ~:i I~ ~~ ,;. Jo'~ J- [ijJ", f
;HIII;I,1
. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . !
I
I ~ ..-" ill
- "f ~
In. I; .
~I
r".;;YI l ~..~I-
~ .
~ ~
i III I' - ~ III ~
~ - ~
~ ~
dtl "
i l i i
1 .
, ,- en
. III. z
1.1 0
, i=
. ~, <C
t. :' >
w
"( . I ...J
... W
- . .- . 1< .,1,
J' w
, IiII3: ~
" ~ <C
1 . '" " e::
.
~ !:~ . <C
, ~
I . i;r1i
.
, , I J. i' J. j'
'I 1,1,1,
)'111 . .. .. .. .
,
,
" " (~ II ::
, 1
' I I II'
I I l
I 0
, . ~,.fl_ 1 u
00
_J "
~
. , <<
.i ~ ~
, ,
I . ~ ~
, , I ~I
I ~
. ~
0
. 00
i j I "
'1[,1 I , 0: 0
-;... . .. - , '"
. ~ :-II!!C. ~ II l!l "- ~
l >
.. "... ---+ . " '" ~
:!' ,.. . I:' '" ~
I ~5~~
~ ''!J,~ EJ (I) Il. >-0
-- g I ::lW<fD
- - "'~~~
~ III >-~~-
<ca:Cli:i
~d! l:~~.
~~oo~
~ 'lBE 00 <5~~~
0
0
N
cri
N
f--- =s
<IJ
:J
CJ
:J
<(
re ~,>
l:D
r.....
~!I.:;
I
I
[ijJ~ f
!
:s:
w
:>
>-
a:
I-
z
W
o
u
00
"
~
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0:
'" 0
0. ~
'" >
'" ~
~5~fi
(I) Il. >-15
::lW<fD
"'~~.
>-~~~
<g:Cli:i
l:_~.
~~OO~
~~:ll:3
......0..",,0
00
o
o
N
cri
N
f---
<IJ
:J
'-'
:J
<(
"-#.
.... ,,:
~~f
;"...
r
reI!
r.....
~!I.:;
I
I
[ijJ:;jj f
!
:s:
w
:>
a:
w
>
o
<C
N
<C
...J
c..
o
u
00
"
~
<<
~
,
~
~
~
o
00
"
0: 0
0': ~
'" ~
'" ~
~5~~
(I) Il. >-0
i~~~
>-~~~
<ca:Cli:i
l:~ .
W:;;~:z
co I-lIloo!2
co <~:ll:3
~ <,:)0..<<>0
cri
N
f---
~ ~
:J
<(
.-11
,:7\ ~~
"-J
~
~~
z "'
- ,
!,1 ,
> ~-
~:.;jjj
=
,
I ,
I ~
I
L
en
I-
Z
w
:E
:E
0
I u CIO
~ a:I 0
a: ,
, [~g~ 0
, C
, 6~9j .-
, ,
e 1m 0 0
I- .-
" w
y en
z
, 0
~ ~ a.
11mJ en
w
a:
::;.n~ !~_.3
'~~H~~
(f)
W
f-
<( !:;: 0
u
U 'E:;g "
~ -''''f;;~ 0
0 0:: 0 l "'i~~Zi "
~,,~,......, "
(f) <l: 0: !ni~~ "
Il. :;; ,,, , z
(f) II = <
, "
C/) UJ ~~~ I
<( ..J " "
C/) ::> 0
l'i z-; 0
Z w z 0 ~ .0 R- "
z :5 '" 0 ,,1 ~~
. ~~~ "
>- 0 ~~~ c,"'- '"
...J C/) 0.. "0 D
~ ~ on ~~fijt"~ " on .. "
0::: :J UJ .. ll. <
I- ::iH~:i 5: lJ >
aJ en UJ 6 Z iiiuowll ~l , ~ l UJ w
W u ~ u w ~~~~~~ ~ UJ ~
" I- " , wz::lc
a::l >- UJ 0 z / z 0 , ~:'lg~
~ 0: C!) z 0 0 ..... ,;
0.. < ,I"'" ~t nh~ (/)0..>-0
~ 0 " U 8 t, ~~ ~ ~ U ~W<[a1
0 " << cc!:2S;::
~ "''''..." " I- ' "'''-0 ~
<( '" z JO",; >-h:l~!!:!
w UJ < 0 u
I- en oIj " w 'l'l- c(o::(:)(ij
I ~ w ~
<l: <1: 0 ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ro 3:lLOD:::
I 0 ~ w~~z
U (9 "' 0 r .. ~"- t..~ 8 0
0.. <0 " oCi3;88r:~g . 0 t-lf.l~~
N <(<[oCll
0; oa:~~
a:
w
OJ
,. ~
w
U
w
0
"0 <I ~ QI ~ 1 ~i'
-2. iO E il::S! :::.- g-~ " " r:g 13
S~ ti~~J~~~~I~~jl
. ..~ l- '- '- ""c o:S .. <: Q/ E
fl >6 ~~.,Q g-g.!'!j;:g ~ GJ~~
~ il;:;v~"E".t.t:! j-5g~
:'::I;:;.Qa...~~~OI~-~
15:g. C to"<: ::0 _ " ~ ~ 'I: .....Q '" ~
".; '~g~2g~~Efr8~~8::
~:l (i;;; e: 1l t.5 ~ -&.....,g :l ~ ('l
~ ~ ~~[~~ S]~-S~,r:t
~c O<=..O..~-;;;I-~-<:!!""
~ ,"' .. r~ ::.. ~"' l;' ~~ 11 r;: ~ ~
-'" 0 ... ~ -6 :::.!!! C [":: :: ~ ~ 'x""':'
:.8 11 '2.* C L ~ .g .~ ~.cil :I t> ~ ~ ~
~ ~~-i~;f ~ g-~~r~ ~J; ~ ~'g
~-tOi:l a ~ ~ g E '- ; ~ R_~:= ~ ~ K
t:l 3.<: QI:g '" " ! 8 Cl. Cl. E ..<: ~o.Q:(
.s~&~ ~i: g~]~] 0.1 ~~ 5 OJ
,,~~, ....2~.c-" 0 ""o1;t c:; [..Q ~
~v"'..~;;;o...5cO'..o.;:;"'.",~
~"&8 .. 0.. .... C _ ;: e.i' ~ Iii .. ~ &:::
S" 0'> '6 ~.'" ., 531: 0.. t: "" c.. Q; 0 ~
~~~~5~g~~~~~~~~e~
;~~-~..Q!~E~t~~~1-3Cl.!
is'~S<O ~~.~.. ~~.... Eal6'~~:"':
~.~ ~ _~ -k ~ ~ ~ ~ 13 ~ 0 1; _!!~ S ~
{j!'f,;g 1i ~ al j: ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ -g 5..1 ~
'5 " i;:& J! (; 5 ~ g ~ ~ ~ ;;-~::;; .5 5
~.,S~6~GJ';;tcEt;.."'L~3:S8-
~ g-:r~~:.g~ ~ e~~~3l~ g ~
g-:Q" 0-" 0 G "",=..<: QI '!I;t..~ 0lI" r
.Q. ,1:: ~ ':;; !i ~..S! ~ o;g b -S 0; g ~ ~ ';.
'" ~ -s ll.1:: '" -g -" ~ ;t .. ::l ~ ",::::;;;-'"
ti.!2=Q K~ 8 l;;i'i:'O-g ;;!;oll,il.l::l-g
~:i~Oit:g~:=:i~~~
g-:5E&.]~::;'"5~",,,c..o:~s--g
~ .!! ~ ~ E~.g ~ ~ ~ E g ~ ~ L~ ~
~~~~~~~~l;~~~~'Eg~
I- == '5 1-"", '5"ti c:ll- :;:> 8 0.. aJ !.<I' g
"
~
~
"
<
5 ~ ~]
-! t~ 10 .3
E i;i ~ ~
~ ~.i ~
~ a> o.,g
~~:8
;;; .,,-
~!?: -g
~~~;
g ~-5'
go E 5-
0; OJ ~ ..
~"ti g '5
.5 ~1l
"'C., "
c.. ~.;; :' 5
~~~~f
E ~o';; E
8- ~ ,,1 ~
~ E5 t: ~
~ ~ ~~:;
., ~]'5-
c ~ B ~ E
~ g:2 ~ t
~~~~o
"' e 15 5 ~
2~].sE
~t~.~.~
c..-5 "'!i "
~ .. g,.n.f
.s-S:;::~___
J; 8 -E 0
~ ~ g-.~ g
~ g, ~ ~ ~
o~~~~
~
c
Z
~
,
o
u
o
~
o
~
~
~
"
z
u
~
w
o
o
c
Z
2
~
~ 0(" ~ g
~""~ "<l '"tl-~, ~t:..Qfi ~ g
e,~ _E_.~,_,i_&~ ~~~-g..~ .,
~'~ s ' _ ~ go.., c: co -s ~ ~
~:1 ~"",,",,:~]~~s-saJ~
~~ <: "'~t:.sll ~r~toott~_;
"a-.~ ~ { i ~ 5 ~ &'3 ~ ~ g 5i -f:.~ ~
~~..t ., _;;;::: J:"'C:!Gl >:..a..:: ~~ 2-€
~- -E~-:~=8~s,='!~"
--'51 ~i'i1oEoIJ~"'$-.::>c.~;:>:Elt
~ ~ ~ -6:~ E ~~.s ~ ~ ~] ~ ~::: "
oo~ ~-1E80~~wB~-Sg~.f
~~~ ~~ft,11::,,~~~~"U.fi5
11 ~ ~ ~~ ~ : ag 2 ~ .l:l ~ ~ . C1.-E
g ~~ ~'5 (l fo2 j-6c..~"{:6 ~~
t>o.~<: ~~~~a~sJlg,-5-~~~~
it.! ~~f;-E-a~j ~~ ~~] ~
5-S~. ,g ~ i:l:i-g,s Ijo:ti.n tc~ ~
<: "< j~:;:l~:;:;J;::B."j~l-~
~1t -6~~~:;:;]~1i~a~ttg~
_00( ~-,~~_.:_~~_~]~]~;~J
i~ -E . ~ - ~ "LU -
l!i iilt~j!!~~.~jl
:9f'e- ~-i.~S~~~6S:~~~5B
..<>~ S'~~~~sEi~o~tg~
a_~; Q~.::~gj~15~SEa-E"'~
-t;",j'S'=~--.;;-b;:>=o.!':;eQl,,~J1
?-~_, ~ g,~~ ~~ 2 ~.~G';-5 0 w ~
~-_ "'i:_.:oIJ-6....."~o~E,,
~~g ~ ~!.~~ ~.sl~ ~~~.g~.~
: -~ "< ~ 8.~ ; " ~.2 g I-: ~ ~.~ [~ ~
~. o_t p i!:!-.;l-5-5 ~ "'PGj'", e E E "'"'!i
2w- f:.~~B'tj].';_l:S-:<ig,.;:;E-:;
-~~ E..P"'hO~~""'coo"'~i~
:s ~ ~ ' i ~ --s -= -e.; -tEl:: -5 ; ~i5 L g
5'~ rll C1.~ I; .9.~ ~-g18:S.~ ~ 038 ~
<!:! _!O.",~o..:;..... .t!,,:;:> '" ",,"'I.: I) 3:.....r::. ,5"::1
,
g:5 -5S!
i'~ J~1~~~~ ~
~~ 8~,~g ~I- 3-5
~ 1! 0' 5 ~ "-1: .:.( tl
1::;0 S'~ -5 ~ 5 ~ . ~
\:-S'B;:g~d <1.-~ ~iB
-1:' 0:; ~0:5 1 ~ ~ ~,;g ~.5
.!.ii -0 11 t ~:;i -; L.g..,
'€.8 Jg (; '" ~ ~ ~ -g -3:a .
~ ~ R e~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ g
~,;;:~C1.~Bo~.5"'~>6
g- ~ ~-5 ~ '"8 ~ E;g.~ c: ii
t- ~ L.. 0;( .;:I 31: $.2 C1.
~ g~-2~~] Ol~~~<
~-gl';~c5'C::~.g_l::~
~l1~!:.~g.~~~~\'2,
t] ,,_= <( :5 ~ ~ l! .. ::; ~
~ : ::"-g !': B ~ i!:! ~ ~,g ~
.= ~ -s 2 -.;l '" ... --;, CI '- C1. c:
~ESl'~.2~~5~5:t:
~ _II> ,- ... sr.. I 'p -- '" 1>0
..,~ s: ,-:{ii" I "'....:..
~ ~-~ ~ ~ 01 ~ ~.2 5. ~ :5
c c ~ g!!:.~ : 5: "l:I E -Q E
~i~g.i!5~g~~~S
" '" ~ i:: c...p E C1;' oIJ L c: U
r'~~~~] E~:~i-~E
0:);0 a;::; ",U ill E"'=' i5 c
~ 3~ ~ ~ "E ~ -5 : t ~ d
~~~~~g~~-6~.g~
~~~ ~~~~-: :5.~ b ~
13 ~ .0. ~ lJ I- ~ .51:2 ~ -S E
-[ ~ c5 {, ".c: ~ ~ t: '" (l ~
~ :'" i..: -S 0 "": ~ ~ OJ ~..
t'2~.:lE.g~Oj_Et':~
"3 ~ of- ~ '-..:: .. -5 .:; 0 ~ ti
~.s~~~$] ~j-5~
,
1: c ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
.", ----,-:0 ~ ~ ~..:.: v" II
~~ G-E.g~::!_~~~;.
"".0. -c g ~ c -B ~ !g 1! l:
~ -5 0: ~ -;; :t ~] [~~
'" s ,v g,~ t! ~ t '" ~ l"
;'_5 ~.!! ~-5,2 ~.~ g~:;:
.&. ~ ~ --g '" .= ~ '" III ...<: ii
~~f~-5~~-5-5.s~~
"'=' ~ ",...<:" 0'- c ~ ~
~~b..~I-~~~.~l"~
"." EJ: l:-:-ti'<: II E'~ ~1j
~'~-5~-t~ f.1:;; '-'-6 E
~~a~~~,~~i'-~B~
~i)~l~i-rr~~~
J: -8 a. ... '" (l "- -.. "'''' ..
b 5 g.fi ~".:: ~ : E :; ~ .~
:'E ::: 1: -c --g ~ ~~ -g 3:S l"
~ ~ -~ Ii '" "'0 " ",,~ c SI,
;s '" ~ c~ 0 Q" t! Us'"
~~;;,;~:t: E~ ii t~o-5
~d~ ~~g~-t!il:s:::--g
~&~3 ~ ~~.g ~~5 ~
~~ ~-g~ ~-s_;o.~~~.~
"6~..:l 1:; '" E ~ C1.C<J.:)
~Il:::~.!:!~ ~gJi! i:E l:l-5
~ '" 0 ';;; to eel! - "-5 ~ui
~ -~ :: ~ "" .. j; :: ~.~" .~ ~
l'i "'2~]~.."':'~ ~ ~ tiS'
z. t; -<: .. j; 0 _:::: 2 "15 ~ t;
t<O~~~'-j;C>.",,3E..~
1;; ~ " ... ~ b"- is 0 .. (l.S 0
:>1-s ~B--g c 8.~ :::~u g,-;;
..:: .'3<_' ~.. :11! 6 E ui..5
t ~ ~ ~ ~ii ~ -g .j;; ~ ~,2 g
~.Ef,~~O)~~~llG~*'
~~~lj]~~~~-5~~
~
~
"
1
E
8
~
~
c
-,
.~
,
o
8
o
z
o
<
o
~
~
-$.3
'0
'0
,,~
~~
s~
.~ ;8
!,'O
0"
~,~ ~
]'!g
::t::..
gg
€o13
:2~~
2g~
~] :g
~ ~ ~
.= ~~
~ 1l ~
""= 0
~'j -:
~~r
;{j.E
-: <l. ~
"Co
..""
.::, 1: .,
,,::::,-5
~~~
<i:.':: ;>
.
1 "
i oIJ t: ~
of; 1! ~ _
Ii< as g
j l' ~ .,
"....!"'"
-;5 ~~2
..0.<:'<:
~" ~..!:!
~~Q~
~~~~
L "'''olI
J ~ ~ 0
HH
Ii ~ g '0
... ~ '- '"
:.a...1Fo
]-5i~
~-5 ~ " L
~ :) i i1 i
M.,cE...
?t 2' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ E ~ ~
~"ti ~l!-5
~o_:;8
o ~ <) 1;: el
~ ~ .Q~-m
0..2 ~ ~ ~
.s c it ~ :;0
~ ~.51 roo
<:>" ., - ~
i ~~] ~
'" E oj .. li
~~ e~:-
~c( ~Jf-ti
...
-; ';;j 0 "'-
e;-[ .gg-g-
;'r ~ ~ ~ 1
B~ ~~",]
~ ~ s ~ r:;;
~::. :5 ~"'3 ~
.;,; ;:l tOOl '-
H !HH i
~ !! E .~ 8 g, f g
-~ .i'i. ~ C<>.. 0> ~-g
2 ~ J( :5.!:! -fi c ~
~>.~~ ~-W$~~
:f 2 " .. .. ~ '" ~
-o-t8~g~]~
'" '" ~ ::0 E ~ E 11
~ g g&, ~ ~ ~ ;;
i,~ ~i.~]]-~
~ 2 ~~ ~ ~ ,~~
,Q t -t 0.<: u" ,"
(~{;~~..Qi1
.. s; " g.~ ~ 1! ;
-:5~~~~..g,::::;;
~ ._.2 '" ~ .. .Ii ~
~ a ~.c ~ -5 "'-=
.. S <:: ~ ~ .,8 <)
~ ~ il ~ ~ .a~ g
~:..~.g,~~ ~~
iJig-6ESi]
1l~~st:1~~
~ ~~.2 ~-g~-5
1':.':' :;; ~ :0 ~:i: 0>
'i 1'2S::: ""lit--- t
~~,j~~i~l
'"
<
~
,
o
] r
. I
~~
~~
~~
~ g
- 3
.2 g
'(l=
~:2
~ g ~
~ ll: <)
-3 '-- ...
~~~
.' "
c1-t' ~
-2.cf~
.2. ~ .:
~.~ ~
'ii~1
--'......
'.0
cO: ~ ,,,
~!;j'5
~~ ~
~~ C
0.0-,",
~i ~
:O!;:>u
~~ i
-<
Nil
~~
~:.;jjj
en
I-
Z
w
:E
:E
o
u
o
I-
W
en
Z
o
a.
en
w
a:
ro
o
o
N
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
z
<
"
I
C
o
o
"
"
'" D
.. "
ll. <
UJ ~
UJ ~
Wz::lc
~:'lg~
~~::rg
QJ~~;::
>-UI-W
c(~<t>
!:lL;;~
W~~Z
t-lf.l~~
~:2~1n
.....lLOOC
0;
a:
w
OJ
,.
W
U
w
o
~
c
<
"0' 0
.s .. 'OJ ~
~ ~ ~ OJ
~ ~ ~,~
~b~.g
B 1~ E
t: ~ ~"e
t!g.~
30"" fl
* e ~'~.J
~~~.~ ~
~:g ~ E~
:a ~ Q g.~
S 81::.5 tI
~ -g ~::: :: rJ
~ 'e ~ ~~ ~
no ~ 8 0 3: E
-~ ,~ ~ ~ 'g g
-5 p 0 ,-.!i ..
l:J ~ g 1:! -;:; E
;~"5 ~ ~ g.
"3 " E ~ I: <:
~>'8 ~ -~ " ::
-E""........o.o
tJ ~ ~p OJ; ,l:<
"3-8 q,
~_~~1 ~.t
;..E ::.. ~] J;
~ ~"'" -::; 3: ""'
~]~07~~
.~ E'~~~~
o 'i5'"O '" <:Cl '"
~ ct ~.2 ..:]
"" "o..,:r:..
.tF.t~Et
o
:B-;5 GJ{;
~~ ~ ~
<: 0 :l: ~
.[.~;~~
'ii:l::;E.=
.s.2;~]
se~ : ~ t
~ OJ -::; ~ "
"" ~ g:o c ~
]e~<8
~g]~~ ~
~~ ~ ~!: a.
1! ~- """'" '"
J:05~;:;Jj
,,~.~~:: ..?:
~ ~~.:; ~ 5-
&8.1~~~
<: ~a'S.5o.~
..... ::: ~
-€-5r~fd
l E'-''''U II>
;,gJg S -5 .
.':1i~ ~ ~~~
<: '" "'_ 0 0 u
t.~~f~-5~
~~~ ~ S2-~
~~(~~~~
"OJ"'.. "...
~f8~fr~~
~~~~~"g~
"1 ~ ~ ~ s';.g
11]!lir
~ <. r 3 g-~ i:
<:: ~ cG 8
~ " <>.""
.8. g i 3 ~
a -;:;... i1!"
-6 r: lrc .
'~ ~., ~,
~ ll~l]
-:; ~s~~a:
,g -Ei';-5W]
~ s g 3 ~ 0>
~ .. ~ roo:g
~ ~~ g].g
-6 B ~ 5.~ ~
"" 1\1 ~ c.ou
"'- ~ 2 j ~~
~ ~ i t~ 1
g ~~-5~~
<;:::..a """",
~~~g~~1
~ ~.g r; ~:f E
e ~ ~ ~.iI! E.2
S ~ Ci;:; ~ :; 3
;'. t-g -E -5 ~ 1:
~%B"'60:~
K"''''' 11... 0;_
e: Q.. E :;j ~ ~
5 ~ 5 ~ E l; :
no...e..g c ;; ~ g
~~og';,2.'~
~ := b ~ -E; ~ E
:2~E~~~'5
~E~...~~e
~s.c~B-::{
"
-iE.", ~.<:
.;!~ 2]lLa]
~% E-6~:'~~~
~~ ;;.~3;~~-5
~.g;>~~~1l:E~R5
ill H1 nH
--C'E~~""I'~~
] :; 8 <.l ::: ~ ::: OJ ':;: ~
t 'g ~ :> 5'ci <II <II -5 0 '"
:;; IT.2 3: '~ .E g ~ a. 1:
1 'g ~ ~~ ~.; ~ B 1!
<3g~s~~~~J21
~ ~~-~1if ;'~-E.~
:;-5~~~~~,~~=
,,~..t. <.l] a <II'" o.g
~ c: '1:>-6 J! ~ '5'::;': ';!
oS.g !' ~ 0) .., L :g 0 ..
-s~~1l~-<~~,~~
S~-5E8ti]~~~~
'~.sB~'~~~-g~-5~
~,~.% set ~~ iii1o';
, f;; ~ i = ~J.2 1: "-5 ~
~ ~ .~ j ~ ~ ] ! i ~ r
r~W';;J!gE~;"~~
"' ~-~:;;'S~~:g ~~
,~;,~ ~,~ ~ b ~ t1 ~~
~ l~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
;,.~?&~::;t:ti';2a.
:~iSi:~~~l=l:l~ ~
%j ~~~~~~~~ ~
:::~~~~~~~~B~
o
~
.~
~~
" 0
id
:-
~<:
..".!!;!
.0
":5
" "
"1
..<>:
..>-
000;
ii~
, "
~ ~ J
r - ~
OJ ~ G .....
""""'''
S .."'DO)
l' ~ ~ ~
c-- <II 0
~ ~ ~ ~
,-:;oe::
OJ';; "'D
-<;; '" ~ ..
.:: ~ ~ ~
i.1! ~
, ."
~ ~ !l '"
;:: -5 ~a.
]~~~
~ ~ ~ ~
~'t.~~
o~
;;; - ... '"
",'-;!
..1!OJj;
, ~E_
t .. E III
~j:;e~
~
~
_0
r~].[
] ~::r
"'-OJ"1j
~ 5.] ~
S "' B';;
~~ E "
~~~!
'" 6 E e
~.~ 5
~ c. ~"
2e~"
"'- ~ .... !I;
~~]~
~U..'::-6
~5 t>-~:';
~ ~ ~.~ ,~
.[~2~€
<11>4"'- 1'!
~~~.~i .
b "'-o'i5 oj
~ <II OJ C :;., '"
.:-6f8:!: "
0'0 '" ~.E ~
~~:~~-5
~ ~ "'..!!:! b <:>.
:~!..,g a.~
r, ,,~~ B ;j
t:.-5~2"1i g-
~o~l!~;
i""::::~"'-5-5
1; 0 1! s ~ :::i
~ ~:; ~ ~:Fl
l~~~~~
~~ ~::; :i E
~
Mil
~~
~:.;jjj
en
I-
Z
w
:E
:E
o
U@
:J
O~
I-z
w8
en
z
o
a.
en
w
a:
ro
o
o
N
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
z
<
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'" D
.. "
ll. <
UJ ~
UJ ~
Wz::lc
~:'lg~
~~::rg
QJ~~;::
>-ut-w
c(~<t>
!:lL;;~
w~~z
t-lf.l~~
~:2~1n
.....lLOOC
0;
a:
w
OJ
,.
W
U
w
o
~
c
<
.
~ 'lJ
't~ :~
., ~T'
...
"
~
\'
I ~
.
';
I.
'.
..~~t-
~.
....
PlI.:o=:
~:Ia::.
~
,
- t
;:;:
""... "
~ ~
z
~
a.
w
en
o
w
[[
<(a.
"
><16
-z
C..
Z.J
wo.
a.ffi
a.t--
<(~
:;;
"
w
en
o
a.
o
[[
a.
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
"
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'" D
.. "
ll. ~
~ ~
WZ5~
~~~~
<J) ~~
~~s;::
ClJut:!!:!:!
~~~~
g ~~;;~
C\J c:(:2~w
- 00..000
0;
a:
w
~ ~ ~=
LlJ ~:;;'='
f:cl g5
o
~~
1\
p ~t"'~\
Ii , \......
,..- ,\ , \
''':\., .
r .., :.=' ~'..~\
-:::.::., \
....1..."'... \
\\ '.
"\.~., ,~,
, "
1. 1.~ ...
\ 'I \,.~
i ';\l<..\.
t t ~';\\..
l'...~ ~;,~~'\.
.I'''f'- . '~.,= ......
~ '\, .~~ >."
'1 "...~~~".,;\~,.......
. :t.,.~-..:::~ Or;\ .....
. '.t '~o!i'~.. """
~ '.;",J \.X>~-..X \
~l'" :r,~!",,)~, ~\,/
I~ r .
li :It'-t ".,;.J....w.~'r:: J;:,,,, \....
1 '-'.", , . l .
\'. "" ~.. "','1'; .:;,......
'-.. .... _:# ,',.r z'.t!i!; .......
~ j',:k .,,'....~,.,.. ....__ 1 :".
.fi....:=-.-- ~~,.:~... . . ;( -J.' ""f').:..'.....
' ., ... """" ...,...F' ' < , ~ .....
' ,'. , ~;h.":" "'&.:' _' ~_ ,...... ,', ."" _.
~ '1' I ':tj$- ..~ - '-' . - ~:~: Jo ""\ ;"j., .~..........
Jill """ '{!i~"",....~ ,~" ~ ",' 'i ~',
' '" ", '. ,L"1(,1o ~~&'':?'t~~", ~, "
: j,f, "~;:':~.. ~"',lL' L::rr-oi~~..;;"". ~ k' ',< _ "'. c-
r It.l.(-,,,, --.- :f7'r-' ~--.':l::---' .: ~~'!I. ", _~~.."~ .~ ....
" 'I" ..~ e--__..... '" "'," ~.,~'. '." ,
!it! -~;- .~ ...."r.~ .-...... -::I.~, '.... . "~~"'IIo..' _. ''''. :,~,.......
"'-. ..,," ''-'-".;,.. ~. """" ~';' 4, "" ~.,. ~.. .~). )~ I
,.""" .- ~. ~ "", < ',,-.. , .. , , . ..
,.=.,.-. < .,-",. ........, >, -<1..-', _" /
':::,.. 'F" 1I1t;.....
-...;.~ :~ ~ '! ~'''''--'-).1 '/
..... '.. .... ...._. r._.:-.-. ..
.. '!::-:-.. .......If.
~'~... ',~ ,~~~.,.-,.,... -'
~.." "'~.~......,:-~
~ '-.. ,
'''" - .. ........
....:,.. :t .... .I
.. '\..,'"
\'-:-
,
~
J. ~
1 .'
.i.
"'I I i
. l ~
~ 1 :r
~ : ~
.. ..,
~ n~ ~.~
" ,
) .. ~ ",
.. '1.... i ~
. I: i ..,.
... :L1. !:.":
~~~n:.~~
I" iI ~ ..I.. :- :
~ . ., l:': , ~
~~;~~.~n
::'.'l~ l' ~.:; ~~
~ .::-;. ~ - ~
~ '.. I"j =:: ~ ~
I .... .:i ~ . "; ~ .
:-: -,:,c
"
~
,
,.
,.
,
I
~
1
~
-'1'1
-.
,
~
~
,
"
~ '.'~
~ i~
~. \
~ .:~
, 1.:-
; ; ~
. .
,; ~ l \ of
~ J _-:_
~ "-'
. '.Ii l~' ~
" , . .. . .... .-
--:111; .....
~
,
.
~
.
J
- ~
:1....
- ,
'1 I
.~ 0
~.,
~ ~
:: -"1
:!J
?
,
'-
~
L-:,
~.
.~
1:-::
~
f;
~ : i:
~ ~ r
~ f ~ ~
, d.
~ !, j.
, ~ .L' .
~ ~ f~~
! ';i[' "
. ~ i . !.i
~ {'., ~ t'l
, -= i j ~ ~
, ~ I r"'L l:
.,.:...... .
-;::-:;
'';:
.'
-
:1
~
LOll
....
PlI.:o=:
~:Ia::.
:
~:.;jjj ,
en
z
o
~
o
o
a:I~
)(0
_0
Co
z~
We
a.<l
a.g
<(w
~
z
[[
W
I-
.J
<l
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
"
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'" D
: ~
>
~ ~
WZ5~
~~~~
<J) ~~
~~s;::
ClJut:!!:!:!
~~~~
g ~~~~
C\J c:(:2~1n
00..000
0;
a:
- ~
'"
w
U
w
o
~~
~~;
"c
:;;'J
<on
:I:."
:..,~
'.,
~
~:~:
..'
,
,,":.:... .
.. ",..,'
.. ............:- ~
.... ....
'.
,
1
,
r
,
,
I
L
,
I
,
,
I
~
I
I ' . .~
., : II' , [
I: ,'I 1 . I
'Ir. . tI I
~ I 'I ~. ~:., I- I ~
'" .../ I .. ~ I~ ..;:1 . .. I
~ . ~ "'! ,I ..1 ii';; I ......: . : 4:-
i .. . : ~ ,- i e- ~ ,'-:j r · .. i ~ .(
" ;;: I' I ' j, 'l:; i;?~ ; ! J :~ l~ Ji
..I. . '.11 1"1 I! ~. .. ", .'.
_'" ....: . ~ :' 7' _.'
.oj _ I .' ~:: !it r
........ ........ ~..' ~: .': - _. : - I . : .'.1
...... . .. '.... ~)I.~. ~I; ~; ~; ~'I
'.
'.
.',
., :.~ :"::,, j
:I...
.,
<
...:
...
..I
iL~
:1'"
'.'
..Ii
.! 'q"
~ Ii
1
,
! ~
..' :',
'/ ~ .~:
,
.
,
J
,
j
..ii
,
,
,
"
~~
~.
'.
.
,
,
~-~
I
I
~.f~-
.... - '--"-.' .-.-. .-
~-,""- ,~-~" . .
I . i ~ I ". ' -',
,r ~'.' , i ll~{, .L--'-~~ _ taJ~JO' 'I ;1C/~;
~ ~ 11":"
I . .... .... ..,N...J;&~O._ -<' ..J- Z ...-
'I '.: 'f ~'. __."'.il:.:::.:..:.... '-"':.~o,j /.~' ...... .~:::
.--" ..~r"'!~.....
i... . -.
,. , :.... [/"-'\ ......
I .1=_ (~.I. . ," .. '.1''''
;: -71 ,=.1 ". /
. 1.- ! I ", .....
- i ':; r'/"."
,-' .. :" ....... ,)
.. ". ..
u.~"'::="r"'I~....",..,.:. " ~ ~ ......
I. :". . E
.'
I'
.,
::=
.
I
f
L
I I'
, '
, i
/
.....'")
~
~
..':
]
'1'
~ ,
<0
II
r.;.....
~:I ;:;
~
,
~:.;jjj f.
z
<l
.J
n.
'-w
Un.
xj
_ en
Co
z::i
W.J
a.2
a.~
<(:0
w
:I:
o
en
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
z
<
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'"
.. D
ll. ~
UJ ~
UJ ~
Wz::lc
~:)gD::
(/)c..>-~
~W<[a1
QJ~~;::
>-ut-w
c(~<[>
CO 3:lL(:)~
Cl w~~z
~ t-lf.l~O
~:2~in
5 ......lLOOO
a:
w
OJ
,.
W
U
w
o
~~
~~"
;:::::
::0;
::t:.."
:..,~
I
I
-
-
r--II
r.;.....
~:I ;:;
~~ :
r
(\IC)
UZ
x[[
_w
c~
zw
w[[
a.~
a.~
<(w
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
"
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'"
.. D
ll. ~
~ ~
WZ::lC
~:)gD::
(/)c..>-~
~W~al
QJ!:2W:S::
>-Ut-W
c(~<t>
CO 3:lL(:)W
g W~~~
N ~~~~
Oa:~~
0;
a:
w
OJ
,.
W
U
w
o
~;'
~2
:;;:='
:I:.~
:..,~
'I~
I
1\
II ~I ~
'1 _L", - ~
1,,-< ___
I
~I
I L i 1'\
II J g !
II ='\I,~ :;! ~ l \
III Z I
t i / "
I I ~~: --~--T
\J L_~",:-' ~- I
~ ~ ','" '\'-,-.(
,ll ~ rn''''''
I 1,1 II:'"
l-I~~ ~ l-I '111m ,.t'JJ,',. ,~l
I J'.~, '-'\..__~,~
I ,/+.o-,ttl, 1 . I,. " , ,,,,,,,,,,,;:-)...
: 0 ,- ~J:';;l 1-, ",,,, J, 'I"~~~L~~ i
' '" 'I UliJ., r'2i-) , '.r', t::, I ___, !
I, ;; L ~1r1n\~~l gl:4, (/rF':(j~c., ~~~ '~"h~
' · , 0" '- .'-, , , "0 0 _ _ "',~
Ie II z::!; ~ ,wCl !,'/l', '~,' \~,,' ). I!!!,~ ~ r"':"',''''J''-~,
· · < , -'", , . · . ,. 'y.
'" "0. ....."",,, ,._ _~~'"
· < · , ".. '- "" " , " - -'T''''' 'I' ,
1 '''''----Hl; :ji".";,~cir,J_""C ". '
'L-eL t - -~ ---:--"t:[fli~J~r~ .f:I.:~t~
L ~.r 1 < ~~'ll ./ ~g Ii: iE1J;':.A.J !rlJ'1
: :" ~----.,g.~"'--:-J }~~~
,
/'
~t ),
e
I
...tl
i
II
'" 'c
'\ \
v
/';,
" '~\
----' '.',
\\
"\
\",
'--
/
'"
,
~-"--
~
o
>
~
~
J
,
I
I
1
1 ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
r
'I
,I
:1
: -'~--=
,
>---
z
o
~
"
I~
'--I,
~
"
~
>---
~
>-
o
J.
}.VMHV'i)
a~V^31n08
d'
CIO
II
]
....
PlI.:o=:
~:Ia::.
~
,
:
~:.;jjj
,
zS3
en
z
o
CUi
z
)(w
-:;;
C13
Zw
w!::
a.~
a.<l
<(~
1[
o
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
z
<
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'" D
.. "
ll. ~
~ ~
wZ5~
~~~~
<J) <~
~~s;::
ClJuww
)-w!;;:>
~~g~
g ~~~~
C\J c:(:2~1n
00..000
0;
a:
w
OJ
:->
w
u
w
o
~~
~~;
".
"c
:;;'J
<on
::t:.."
:..,~
',."":. .....
'{t~/
~~~1\,"""...
/i.~' ~ t~{\. .'
, .:.'~ -' , --::. tA. ~
r '1J~
-'~l ." . "',
'::~'~~I__ ..;u
I_,-~~ -
:." ... r-~"~~-"
, " :Hi- - -- - .". ,') .'"
. .-.:::""'111 __ .i."
II'll. ~.. .7'"'IIP" ~ -: .
,-l...,'. :. ..~:..
.. ~~I "1-":-.,
..w, :.'L } ".'
-.'
, ,
,
"
;:
oJ
'.
~(
'U,
f-
-
.
en II
,
l
r.;.....
~:I ;:;
I
.
~~ :
r
I
.
.
I
Z
o
;::
o
W
en
w~
><~
_<l
OW
z~
w<l
a.~
a.Z
<(~
"
l:
co
<l
:;!
.J
a.
i
.
o
u
"
o
"
"
"
"
"
I
"
o
o
"
"
'"
.. D
ll. ~
~ ~
WZ::lC
~:)gD::
(/)c..>-~
~W~al
QJ!:2W:S::
>-Ut-W
c(~<t>
CO 3:lL(:)W
g W~~~
N ~~~~
Oa:~~
.
r
.
.
0;
a:
w
OJ
,.
W
U
w
o
~;'
~2
:;;:='
:I:.~
:..,~
APPENDIX C
AIR QUALITY DATA
ALMANAC EMISSION PROJECTION DATA (PUBLISHED IN 2009)
2008 Estimated Annual Average Emissions
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN
All emissions are represented in Tons per Day and reflect the most current data provided to ARB.
o See detailed information.
Start a newauerv.
I STATIONARY SOURCES II TOG II ROG I~I NOX Ilsoxl[~~]PM101IpM2.51
IFUEL COMBUSTION I~QOQJJI 45310ITImm[]]
IWASTE DISPOSAL II 470611 3601c::J:][Q][Q]mmL:QJJ
ICLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS IDI.]I 3491L::Q]mDmmc:J
IPETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING 1c:E}][]J:]L:Q][Q]125.61[J][J]CQ]
IINDUSTRIAL PROCESSES lc:::ITIJo:DJc::J:][Ii][Ii]~m[]]
1* TOTAL STATIONARY SOURCES II 614.611106.6IDDJI 50.61145.911 22.01~OI!J
I AREAWIDE SOURCES II TOG II ROG I~I NOX IISOXI[~~]PM101IpM2.51
ISOLVENT EVAPORATION 10000[I1]c=JDDDDc:J
IMISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES IODJ~[J:~ImJ~[Q]132921117551~
1* TOTAL AREAWIDE SOURCES 11173.511 87.911161.91~[Q]1329.211175.51~
I MOBILE SOURCES II TOG IIROG I~I NOX IISOXI[~~]PM1ollpM2.51
ION-ROAD MOTOR VEHICLES 1~11123111 066711206 71[Q]][JQ][JQ][:::DJ
IOTHER MOBILE SOURCES I~I 70811 474811173810IQ]D:Q][JQ]c::ITI
1* TOTAL MOBILE SOURCES II 200.711183.1111541.511380.51114.911 20.811 20.31~
I NATURAL (NON-ANTHROPOGENIC) SOURCES II TOG II ROG I~I NOX IISOXI[~~]PM101IpM2.51
INATURAL SOURCES 1CJ::iI:iJ11 06.51~[J][Q]mmc:::TI]
1* TOTAL NATURAL (NON-ANTHROPOGENIC) SOURCES 1D..!D]1106.51~[J][Q]m[}]c::TIJ
GRAND TOTAL FOR SA~:~~NCISCO BAY AREA AIR 111104.911484.1111797.011449.71162.011377.211217.210
Start a new ouerv.
The Board is one of six boards, departments. and offices under
the umbrella of the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Cal/EPA I ARB I CIWMB I DPR I DTSC I OEHHA I SWRCB
ALMANAC EMISSION PROJECTION DATA (PUBLISHED IN 2009)
2008 Estimated Annual Average Emissions
SAN MATEO COUNTY
All emissions are represented in Tons per Day and reflect the most current data provided to ARB.
o See detailed information.
Start a newauerv.
I STATIONARY SOURCES IITOG IIROGI[~~]NOXIISOXII PM IlpM101IPM2.SI
IFUEL COMBUSTION Immu[J]ITQ][Q]mCQ]
IWASTE DISPOSAL II 566ImmmITQ][Q]mCQ]
ICLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS Immm[Q]DDDc:J
IPETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING IQ[J]]DDDDDc:J
IINDUSTRIAL PROCESSES 1[J]][D]m[Q]D[iJJmCQ]
1* TOTAL STATIONARY SOURCES II 66.9[TIJ[TI01J[Q][TI]c::IQ]L:Q]
I AREAWIDE SOURCES IITOG IIROGI@~]NOXIISOXII PM IlpM101IPM2.SI
ISOLVENT EVAPORATION l[]]mDDDDDc:J
IMISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES ID[D][JIQ][J][Q]13191~c:::TIJ
1* TOTAL AREAWIDE SOURCES 1[J}'][TI]c:!.!][J][Q]131.910TIJ~
I MOBILE SOURCES IITOG IIROGI@~]NOXIISOXII PM IlpM101IPM2.SI
ION-ROAD MOTOR VEHICLES 1[JJ]][lQ]1106.21~[Q][Q]mCQ]
IOTHER MOBILE SOURCES 10ml 54911377100[]]c::J:]
1* TOTAL MOBILE SOURCES 1[}!]119.211161.11IS4.01@[TI][TI][J]
I NATURAL (NON-ANTHROPOGENIC) SOURCES IITOG IIROGI@~]NOXIISOXII PM IlpM101IPM2.SI
INATURAL SOURCES ImmDDDDDc:J
1* TOTAL NATURAL (NON-ANTHROPOGENIC) SOURCESlmmDDDDDc:J
I GRAND TOTAL FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY 11109.011 42.211174.21IS7.61[}]136.311 20.4[::1]
Start a newauerv.
The Board is one of six boards, departments, and offices under
the umbrella of the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Cal/EPA I ARB I CIWMB 1llEB.1 DTSC I OEHHA I SWRCB
California Home
--
p~ ,;Vl' ;!.$Ji}!1I!J,$J ~!J!J1!1
Highest 4 Daily Maximum Hourly Ozone Measurements
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
iADIM
Year:
~
FAQs
2006
Measurement
0.053
0.052
0.051
0.051
o
0.06
0.057
o
0058
94
Date
First High: May 14
Second High: Sep 26
Third High: Sep 27
Fourth High: Oct 21
# Days Above State Standard:
California Designation Value:
Expected Peak Day Cone.:
# Days Above Nat'l Standard:
National Design Value:
Year Coverage:
Date
Sep 26
May 7
Apr28
Apr 14
2007
Measurement
0.060
0.059
0.058
0.051
o
0.05
0.054
o
0.058
97
Date
Jun 20
Apr 12
Oct 25
Sep4
2008
Measurement
0.082
0.073
0.068
0.066
o
0.06
0.059
o
0,066
98
Go B:::Ickwmd One Ye:::lr
Go Forward One Year
New Top 4 Summ~rv
Notes: All concentrations are expressed in parts per million.
The national1-hour ozone standard was revoked in June 2005 and is no longer in effect. Statistics
related to the revoked standard are shown in l'tafics or italics.
State exceedances are shown in yellow. Exceedances of the revoked national1-hour standard are
shown in orange.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period.
* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.
Switch:
8-Hour
Ozone
PM2.S
Sulfur
Dioxide
Hydrogen
Sulfide
PM10
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
TOp 4 Summaries Start Pal1e
Go to:
oma Statistics Home Pal1e
California Home
--
p~ ,;Vl' ;!.$Ji}!1I!J,$J ~!J!J1!1
Highest 4 Daily Maximum 8-Hour Ozone Averages
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
iADIM
~
FAQs
Year: 2006 2007
Date 8-Hr Average Date 8-Hr Average
National:
First High: Sep 26 0.046 May7 0.053
Second High: Feb 26 0.045 May 11 0.049
Third High: Jun 23 0.045 May 12 0.049
Fourth High: Sep 3 0.044 Apr 14 0.047
California:
First High: Jun 23 0.046 May7 0.053
Second High: Sep 26 0.046 May 11 0.050
Third High: Feb 26 0.045 May 12 0.049
Fourth High: Feb 25 0.044 Apr 14 0.048
National:
# Days Above '08 Nat'1 Std.: 0 0
'08 Nat'1 Std. Design Value: 0.045 0.045
National Year Coverage: 95 97
California:
# Days Above State Standard: 0 0
California Designation Value: 0.050 0.050
Expected Peak Day Cone.: 0.051 0.051
California Year Coverage: 94 97
Go Backward One Year New Top 4 SummarY
Date
Apr 12
Apr 13
Apr29
Apr22
Apr 12
Apr 13
Apr22
Apr 29
2008
8-Hr Average
0.066
0.052
0.050
0.049
0.066
0.053
0.050
0.050
o
0.046
98
o
0.050
0.052
98
Go Forward One Year
Notes: All averages are expressed in parts per million.
National exceedances are shown in orange. State exceedances are shown in yellow.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period.
* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.
Switch:
Hourly
Ozone
Nitrogen
Dioxide
Hydrogen
Sulfide
PM10
PM2.S
Carbon
Monoxide
Sulfur
Dioxide
Go to:
TOp 4 Summaries Start Pal1e
oma Statistics Home Pal1e
California Home
--
p~ ,;Vl' ;!.$Ji}!1I!J,$J ~!J!J1!1
iADIM
Highest 4 Daily Maximum 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Averages
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
~
FAQs
Year:
2006
Date Measurement
2007
Date Measurement
2008
Date Measurement
National:
First High: Dec 5 2.09 Jan 2 1.60 Dec 6 2.29
Second High: Dec 8 1.91 Jan 20 1.50 Oct 25 1.96
Third High: Dec 6 1.90 Jan 19 1.47 Feb 9 1.51
Fourth High: Jan 24 1.74 Nov 3 1.44 Mar 3 1.44
California:
First High: Dec 4 2.09 Jan 2 1.60 Dec 5 2.29
Second High: Dec 7 1.91 Jan 19 1.50 Oct 24 1.96
Third High: Dec 5 1.90 Jan 18 1.47 Feb 8 1.51
Fourth High: Jan 23 1.74 Nov 2 1.44 Mar 3 1.44
# Days Above Nat'1 Standard: 0 0 0
# Days Above State Standard: 0 0 0
Year Coverage: 97 96 97
Go Backward One Year New Top 4 Summary Go Forward One Year
Notes: All averages are expressed in parts per million.
State exceedances are shown in yellow. National exceedances are shown in orange.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period.
* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.
Switch:
Hourly
Ozone
8-Hour
Ozone
PM10
PM2.S
Nitrogen
Dio)(ide
Sulfur
Dio)(lde
Hydrogen
Sulfide
Go to:
Data Statistics Home Pace
Too 4 Summaries Start Pace
California Home
--
p~ ,;Vl' ;!.$Ji}!1I!J,$J ~!J!J1!1
Highest 4 Daily Maximum Hourly Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
iADIM
Year:
~
FAQs
2006
Measurement
0.107
0.076
0.065
0.065
o
0.016
98
Date
Sep 26
Oct 23
Sep 21
Feb 5
2007
Measurement
0.069
0.062
0.058
0.057
o
0.016
97
Date
First High: Oct 27
Second High: Sep 25
Third High: Feb 9
Fourth High: Apr 19
# Days Above State Standard:
Annual Average:
Year Coverage:
Date
Oct 22
Apr7
Oct 24
Oct 16
2008
Measurement
0.062
0.059
0.059
0.058
o
0.016
97
Go Backward One Year
New Top 4 Summary
Go Forward One Year
Notes: All concentrations are expressed in parts per million.
State exceedances are shown in yellow. National exceedances are shown in orange.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period. A high Year Coverage does not mean that there was
sufficient data for annual statistics to be considered valid.
* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.
Switch:
Hourly
Ozone
PM2.S
Carbon
Monoxide
Sulfur
Dioxide
Hydrogen
Sulfide
8-Hour
Ozone
PM10
Go to:
Data Statistics Home Paae
Top 4 Summaries Start Paae
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us AOD: Home
IWCk:m~~ CalifS?!:.nia~ YJWW,AY1
~ ..:11I j!g..j!J!Jj!J:J-;j EJ!J:1iU
itDIW
Highest 4 Daily PM10 Measurements
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
FAQsl
Year:
2006
Date Measurement
2007
Date Measurement
2008
Date Measurement
National:
First High: Oct 26 58.0 Feb 5 65.7 Sep 3 41.2
Second High: Dee 25 57.7 Jan 24 58.2 Oct 15 39.3
Third High: Dee 7 53.1 Nov 26 44.2 Jul 23 38.4
Fourth High: Jun 22 46.8 Dee 14 38.7 Aug 28 37.8
California:
First High: Dee 25 61.4 Feb 5 69.8 Sep 3 41.3
Second High: Oct 26 59.6 Jan 24 62.1 Oct 15 40.3
Third High: Dee 7 56.0 Nov 26 46.9 Jan 19 40.0
Fourth High: Jun 22 47.7 Dee 14 41.5 Jul 23 39.6
Measured:
# Days Above NaI'l Standard: 0 0 0
# Days Above State Standard: 3 2 0
Estimated:
3-Yr Avg # Days Above Nat'l Std: 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Days Above Nat'l Standard: 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Days Above State Standard: 17.3 12.0 0.0
State 3-Yr Maximum Average: 23 23 23
State Annual Average: 22.9 21.9 22.0
National 3- Year Average: 21 21 21
National Annual Average: 22.0 20,9 21 1
Year Coverage: 100 98 100
Go Backward One Year Np.w Top 4 Summary Go Forward One Year
Notes: All concentrations are expressed in micrograms per cubic meter.
The national annual average PM10 standard was revoked in December 2006 and is no longer in effect.
Statistics related to the revoked standard are shown in italics or italics.
State exceedances are shown in yellow. National exceedances are shown in orange.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
Statistics may include data that are related to an exceDtional event.
State and national statistics may differ for the following reasons:
State statistics are based on California approved samplers, whereas national statistics
are based on samplers using federal reference or equivalent methods.
State and national statistics may therefore be based on different samplers.
State statistics for 1998 and later are based on local conditions (except for sites in the
South Coast Air Basin, where State statistics for 2002 and later are based on local conditions).
National statistics are based on standard conditions.
State criteria for ensuring that data are sufficiently complete for calculating valid annual averages
are more stringent than the national criteria.
Measurements are usually collected every six days. Measured days counts the days that a measurement
was greater than the level of the standard; Estimated days mathematically estimates how many days
concentrations would have been greater than the level of the standard had each day been monitored.
3-Year statistics represent the listed year and the 2 years before the listed year.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period. A high Year Coverage does not mean that there was
sufficient data for annual statistics to be considered valid.
* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.
Svvitch:
Hourly
D70ne
8-Hour
D70np.
PM2.S
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
SulfUl
Dioxide
Hydrogen
Sulfide
Go to:
Data Statistics Home Paoe
Too 4 Summaries Start Paae
California Home
--
p~ ,;Vl' ;!.$Ji}!1I!J,$J ~!J!J1!1
iADIM
Highest 4 Daily PM2,5 Measurements
San Francisco-Arkansas Street
~
FAQs
Year:
2006
Date Measurement
2007
Date Measurement
2008
Date Measurement
National:
First High: Dec 25 54.3 Feb 5 45.2 Jan 14 29.4
Second High: Dec 7 37.2 Jan 24 44.5 Jan 19 26.8
Third High: Dec 6 36.9 Feb 4 38.3 Dec 5 23.8
Fourth High: Dec 3 34.6 Feb 3 36.8 Nov 29 22.6
California:
First High: Dec 25 54.3 Feb 5 45.2 Nov 24 39.2
Second High: Dec 7 37.2 Jan 24 44.5 Nov 25 35.8
Third High: Dec 6 36.9 Feb4 38.3 Dec 10 33.9
Fourth High: Dec 3 34.6 Feb 3 36.8 Dec 6 33.5
Estimated Days> '06 Nat'1 24-Hr 3.1 5.1 *
Std:
Measured Days> '06 Nat'1 24-Hr 3 5 0
Std:
'06 Nat'1 24-Hr Std Design Value: 31 29
'06 Nat'1 24-Hr Std 98th Percentile: 27.8 27.4 *
National Annual Std Design Value: 9.7 9.3 *
National Annual Average: 9.7 8.7 *
State Ann'l Std Designation Value: 11 10 12
State Annual Average: 9.7 8.9 11.7
Year Coverage: 95 99 41
Go Backward One Year New Too 4 Summarv Go Forward One Year
Notes: All concentrations are expressed in micrograms per cubic meter.
State exceedances are shown in yellow. National exceedances are shown in orange.
An exceedance is not necessarily a violation.
State and national statistics may differ for the following reasons:
State statistics are based on California approved samplers, whereas national statistics
are based on samplers using federal reference or equivalent methods.
State and national statistics may therefore be based on different samplers.
State criteria for ensuring that data are sufficiently complete for calculating valid annual averages
are more stringent than the national criteria.
Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when
concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data represent none of the high period: 100
means that data represent the entire high period. A high Year Coverage does not mean that there was
sufficient data for annual statistics to be considered valid.
* There was insufficient data available throughout the year to determine the value.
Switch:
Hourly
Ozone
a-Hour
Ozone
PM10
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
Sulfur
Dioxide
Hydrogen
Sulfide
Go to:
Data Statistics Home Paae
Top 4 Summaries Start Paae
"
'"
OJ
.0
:s
ci.
a
co
~
D
'"
>-
ro
5:
Q)
ro
(?
'"
ro
c
a
.i5J
Q)
>: [t:
ro -
ro
0 ro
-
(f) 0
u
c 0
:J <(
a -
0. >-
" ro
('oj (f) 5:
oi to Q)
a ro
c CL (? ~I ~I '" ~ 0
0 Q) C;
.Ui [t: - (f) '" '"
Q; (f) 0 '" '"
(f) -0 D '" '"
> c Q) D
"' a 0 '"
0 .w 0:: ~
0 (f) >
('oJ E c a
Vl Z ~I '" ~I '" ~
E w ~ 0 '" a;
Q) ill (0 .. ;;; "'
-2 :J C'i '"
::J C 52 >
s: CL '"
a D
u 0< D (fJ
Q) (f) '" w
c Q) () '" ~I '" ~ '" f- ~ '"
:0 0 ~ D '" N <( 0
E - E D '" "' :;; '"
() N >= N
a ro W '"
0 (fJ
0 ::2' <( w
>- c 0 z
::2' a [t: a
c .~ LL w
0 Q) LL (fJ '!2
> 0 w :;;
c !;( w
ro c c ~
C a a :;; <(
m ~ >= z
- c u u (fJ a
II! :J Q) Q) (fJ w >=
(f) (f)
Q) a ro ro w z <(
:Q 0 m m f- a '"
co <( w
a ~ a (f) (f) :;; w "-
LL D Q) C C >= (fJ a
u '" ro a a (fJ '0 ~ '0 0 '0
Q) >- ::2' .w .w w w z
ro ro (f) (f) v v v
Z 0; W 0; <( 0;
.c 5: c E E a '" ~ '" w '"
:;: (fJ Q) ro W W w ~ S! ~ 0 ~
0.. '" ro (fJ E E E
'!2 I '"
'" (f) (? Q) Q) :;; c W c :J c
a c (j (j ~ ~ a ~
0 .c a E E w ,; G ,; (fJ ,;
'" Q) ~ t W
~ E Q) Q) 0 ro ~ ro <( ro
() > > 0. 0 '2 <( '2 w '2
Q) ro a v '" Vl Z Vl Vl
'" -" a -" '" -"
'" E z ..J U U :J '=- '=- <( '=-
~ 0 ro ro " a ~
0 ro -0 -0 a a ~ (fJ (fJ (fJ "- (fJ
'" Z ~ ~ a ~
Q) Ci Q) Q) [t: [t: E <( <( '" <( <(
Ol .Q! 0 0 c 8 E w f- W f- :;; f-
ro '" 0:: 0:: ~ '" a "- a :J a
0. ill u: 0 (fJ <( f- a f- (fJ f-
~I c; 0 c; ~ 0 '" '"
0 ~ '" '"
0 0 0 ~ :;; '" '"
V "- '" '"
0
.8
'0 ~
V '0
V V
ro c ro
'" ro '"
~ ~I '" 0 '" ~ ~ >< '" '"
E 0 E
0 0 0 V a '" '"
c .,. 0 .,. c Z ;;; ;;;
::> ~ ::>
,; ~
0 ,;
ro (fJ ro
0 ro 0
V v V ~
-< 0.
"- "- E V
~ ~
'0 ~I '0 0; C
c '" 0 0 .,. '" c (9 '" '" c s:
13 N 0 0 "' '" 13 a N N V
0 0 0 '" '" '" "' "' E
"- "- N N C
V V 0
.8 ~
C C ro '"
C v 0
s: s: ~ (fJ 0
V N
(fJ (fJ 0. E 0
-'-' w w E 1;; .,. >
5 f- -'-' !;( '" ~ ~ 0
<( 5 -"
0. ~ ~ '6' z
v :;; 0. :;; ~ ro
c v ~ '"
'" >= 0 '" >= ro '"
(fJ .~ 0. C ~ ~
." ~ '0 (fJ '0 ~ ro
w ." w .8
V E v v v ~ V '"
0 z ro z ro 0
a w 0 c 0 0. 0
:;; '0 '" a '" 0 u E N
V (jj V ~ '0 (jj ~ u v v u
"- ro '!2 jl c ~ E v (fJ jl E ~ :0 f- ~
CD '" :;; s: '" c ro ~ c ~ 5 ~ E
~ ~ c ~ '" ~ '" 0 "' w
0 E w 0 U ~ ,; ~ w ,; c U '0 C;
C W Z ~ 0 ro E ~ ro ~ v V N
~ '0 C '0 '0 5
::> 0 0 0 '2 ::> <( '2 ~ ~ ~
'" '" Ii: ~ z ~ u u .~
v ~ e -" -" v
'" ~ ::> ro c V '=- 0; a ~ '=- 0; .~ .~ >- v
'" 0 ~ a (9 ." ~ c ~ ~ c >
0 0 (fJ ro E U (fJ 0 0. (fJ 0 -0 -0 ~
N (fJ e u 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c .~
Q) Ci <( oS ~ ~ <( '" v <( '" u
Ol ~ '0 ~ :c V V ~ ~ ~
ro W ~ c 5 f- W u f- v v 0;
ro '" v '" ro v u a 0. "- '" a 0. 0 0 E
0. ill -<: ro -<: 'f
<( Z I ~ 0 f- a a a f- a 0 0 w
" N " 0 0 '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .,.
~ 0 0 0 '" '" .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 E '"
V N '" .... 0 0 0 0
f--- .... .... is 1;;
:;; '" '" ~
> .0 .0 0
'" '"
0; '" '"
-0 '" '"
f--- .,. .,.
~ .,.
5 '"
0; ~
~ '" '" ." C
0. "' "' ~ 0
~ .. .. 1;; '" "' 0 0 .,. .... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E z
'" '" " '" .... 0 0 ;: '" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E
0; '" '" 0; '" '" 0 0 '" N "' 0
15 "' "' 0; 0
f--- 0 0
v "'
'5 <ri
E
2) 0 E
'" 0
.c .. 0
::> 0
0 '"
z
1;; N '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0; "' ~ "'
v '" 0;
0. 0- Y ~ '"
~ ~ c 0
.- 0 0 ,J,
0 z
c 0 E
::> 0
~ x I
v
~ ~
::> V
'0 V ....
C 0; '" v
ro '" <ri u:
~ v 0. '"
'5 0. 0 '"
~ ~ ~
V '" .... '" .,. N N 0 0 0 0 .,. 0; (fJ
~ 0.
~ V ~ 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 ~ ,J,
'"
E C v 8
E '0
~ V V .~ I
(fJ '" u v
ro ~ '"
~ D-
u
<(
~ '"
5 6
S
,J,
8
I
~
~ ~ ,Q
~ ,Q ,Q 0
0
,Q 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 ci
0 o. ,,-; '?
0 .,. '? c;
~ ~ ci -;;;-
:;; ,Q ,Q c; 0 o. ~
0.. ~ 0 0 0 o. '" I
CD ,Q "' 0 0 ci .,. '"
.... "' "' ~
0 '\' "i' '" ~ u ~
0 "' ~ ~ ~
.... u u u i= 0,
~ v '" "' "' ~ ~ ~ C
0. .... i=
~ v v '" .... i= i= S' v
"' v ~
'" ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ S' S' S' ro ~ v ~ E 0.
(0 0 v ~ ~ 0 u u u ro v ~ ~ u ,jj 0 ~
0 ~ '5 ~ ~ ~ ro ro v I ~ "' "
N ::> 0. V <( i= i= i= v v ~ "' u I
Q) Ci v U I I I ~ c 5 <5 5 c
Ol '0 U :c :c :c :c '0 2 2 -6 ro 0 ro
ro '" c '" ro ~ -" 15 ~ 15 -"
ill ro ~ '" '" '" v v v 0 :'5 u :'5
0. ~ 0 ::J ::J ::J :;; ::J ::J :;; I :;; (fJ :;;
~ '" 0 0
E <ri .0 <ri
0 '" N
1;;
~
0
~ '" 0 0
5 <ri .0 '"
0; ~ '" N
." C
~ 0
E z
8
0
v "- 0 0
'5 '" .0 <ri
E '" .,.
E
0
0
~ '" 0
~ '" .0 <ri
0 '" .,.
,J,
E
0
~ I
c
0
~
'5
<;
0 0. 0 0
" 0 '" .0 <ri
> 0; fi; '"
ro ,J,
,= ~
v E
'0 0
.~ I
v
'"
~ '" 0 '"
5 <ri .0 N
;;: '" '"
,J,
E
0
I
v
~
~
'0
C
-"!
'"
:;: e
-;;;- 0;
0.. ~ 0; ."
CD I ~ ~
v E
0 ~ :2 '0
C, 0. .~ E
~ c .s v 0
v '" 0
'" ~ ~ ~
'0 ~ ~
'" 0 0. V ~
0 ~ v 0. 0.
~ ~ 0.
Q) N 0.
Ol Ci l" ~ v
0. '5 '5 u
ro '" ~ ~ '"
0. ill '" '#- '#- 0
"
'"
OJ
.0
:s
ci.
a
:J
a
u
.S
m
ill
t)
ro
::2'
'"
ro
c
a
.i5J
Q)
>: [t:
ro -
ro
0 ro
-
(f) 0
u
c 0
:J <(
a -
0. >-
" ro
('oj (f) :s:
oi to Q)
a ro
c CL (') ~I ~I '" ~ .,.
0 Q) C;
.Ui [t: - (f) .,. .,.
Q; (f) 0 "' "'
(f) -0 D
> C Q) D
"' a 0 '"
0 .w 0:: ~
0 (f) >
('oJ E c a
Vl Z ~I ~I 0 ~
E w ~ N N :;
Q) ill (0 '" "' '"
-2 :J C'i "'
::J C 52 >
s: CL '"
a D
u 0< D (fJ
Q) (f) '" w
c Q) () '" ~I 0 ~ '" f- ~ '"
:0 0 ~ D '" '" <( '"
E - E D '" '" :;; .,.
() '" >= .,.
a ro W '"
0 (fJ
0 ::2' <( w
>- c 0 z
::2' a [t: a
c .~ LL w
0 Q) LL (fJ '!2
> 0 w :;;
c :J !;( w
ro a c c ~
C u a a :;; <(
m .S ~ >= z
- c u u (fJ a
II! m :J Q) Q) (fJ w >=
(f) (f)
Q) ill a ro ro w z <(
:Q 0 m m f- a '"
a t) <( w w
a (f) (f) :;; "-
LL ro Q) c c >= (fJ a
u ::2' ro a a (fJ ~ 0
Q) >- ::2' .w .w w '0 w '0 z '0
ro ro (f) (f) v v v
Z 0; W 0; <( 0;
.c :s: c E E 0 '" ~ '" w '"
:;: (fJ Q) ro W W w ~ S! ~ 0 ~
0.. '" ro (fJ E E E
'!2 I '"
~ (f) (') Q) Q) :;; c W c :J c
a c (j (j ~ ~ ~
~ .c a w C- O
iO '" Q) ~ E E t W ,; ,; (fJ ,;
~ E Q) Q) 0 ro ~ ro <( ro
() > > 0. 0 '2 <( '2 w '2
Q) ro a v '" Vl Z Vl Vl
'" -" 0 -" '" -"
'" E z ..J U U :J '=- '=- <( '=-
~ 0 ro ro " 0 ~
0 ro -0 -0 a a ~ (fJ (fJ (fJ "- (fJ
N Z ~ ~ 0 ~
Q) Ci Q) Q) [t: [t: E <( <( '" <( <(
Ol .Q! 0 0 c 8 E w f- W f- :;; f-
ro '" 0:: 0:: ~ '" 0 "- 0 :J 0
0. ill u: 0 (fJ <( f- 0 f- (fJ f-
~I c; 0 c; ~ 0 '" '"
0 ~ " "
0 0 0 ~ :;; "' "'
V "-
0
.8
"0 ~
V "0
V V
0; C 0;
'" ro '"
~ ~I 0 ~ ~ >< 0 0
E N N 0 E
0 v a N N
C '" 0 '" c Z "' "'
::> ~ ::>
,; ~
0 ,;
ro (fJ ro
0 ro 0
V v V ~
-< 0-
"- "- E V
~ ~
"0 ~I "0 0; C
c 0 0 0 0 0 c (9 '" '" c s:
13 '" 0 0 N '" 13 a '" '" v
0 0 0 e- e- '" '" '" E
"- "- '" '" c
V V 0
.8 ~
C C ro '"
C v 0
s: s: ~ (fJ 0
V N
(fJ (fJ 0- E 0
-" w w E 1;; " >
5 f- -" !;( '" ~ ~ 0
<( 5 ~
0- ~ ~ '0 z
v :;; 0- :;; ~ ro
c v ~ '"
'" >= 0 '" >= ro '"
(fJ .~ 0- C ~ ~
." ~ '0 (fJ '0 ~ 0;
w ." w .8
V E v v v ~ V e-
o Z 0; Z 0; 0
a w 0 c 0 0- 0
:;; "0 '" a '" 0 u E N
V (jj V ~ "0 (jj ~ u v v u
"- 0; '!2 jl c ~ E v (fJ jl E ~ :0 f- ~
~ '" :;; s: '" c 0; ~ c ~ 5 ~ E
~ ~ ~ c ~ '" ~ '" 0 0 w
E w u ~ ~ w U "0 N
iO 0 ~ ,; E ,; c 0
c W Z 0 ro ~ ro ~ v V N
~ "0 C "0 "0 5
::> 0 0 0 '2 ::> <( '2 ~ ~ ~
'" '" Ii: ~ z ~ u u .~
v ~ e ~ ~ v
'" ~ ::> ro c V ~ 0; a ~ ~ 0; .~ .~ >- v
'" 0 ~ a (9 ." ~ c ~ ~ c >
0 0 (fJ ro E U (fJ 0 0- (fJ 0 <5 <5 ~
N (fJ e u 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c .~
Q) Ci <( oS ~ ~ <( '" v <( '" u
Ol ~ "0 ~ :c V V ~ ~ ~
ro W ~ c 5 f- W u f- v v 0;
ro '" v '" 0; v u a 0- "- '" a 0- 0 0 E
D- il> .<: ro .<: 'f
<( Z I ~ 0 f- a a a f- a 0 0 w
" 0 '" 0 0 '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 V "
~ 0 0 0 0 '" '" e- O 0 0 0 0 0 E '"
V N '" e- O 0 0 0
f- '" '" is 1;;
:;; '" '" ~
> '" '" 0
N N
0; " "
<5 ro ro
f- '" '"
~ "
5 '"
0; ~
~ e- e- ." c
0- '" '" v 0
~ <ri <ri 1;; 0 0 0 " e- N 0 0 0 e- O 0 E z
" " '" 0 '" 0 0 ;: '" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E
0; "' "' 0; 0 '" 0 0 '" N '" 0
<5 ci ci 0; 0
f- 0 0
V "'
'5 <ri
E
2) 0 E
0 0
.c 0
::> ;;;
0 N.
Z
1;; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0
'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0
0; '" V "'
V '" 0;
0- rr y ~ '"
~ ~ c 0
.- 0 0 V
0 z
c 0 E
::> 0
~ X I
V
~ ~
::> V
"0 V e-
c 0; "' V
ro '" <ri u:
~ V 0- '"
'0 0- 0 '"
~ ~ ~
V '" e- O '" e- '" '" '" 0 " 0; (fJ
~ 0-
~ V ~ '" ;:: 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ~ V
"' N
E C V 8
E "0
~ V V .~ I
(fJ '" u V
ro V '"
~ D-
u
<(
~ '"
5 6
S
V
8
I
~
~ ~ ,Q
~ ,Q ,Q 0
0
,Q 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 ci
0 o. '" '?
0 " '? C;
~ ~ ci "'
:;; ,Q ,Q C; 0 o. 2
D- ~ 0 0 0 o. '" I
~ ,Q "' 0 0 ci " '"
~ e- "' "' ~
0 '\' "i' '" u ~
iO "' ~ ~ ~ ~
e- u u u i= 0,
~ V '" "' "' ~ ~ ~ C
0- e- i=
~ V V '" e- i= i= S' V
"' V ~
'" ~ 0- ~ ~ ~ S' S' S' ro ~ V ~ E 0-
(') 0 V ~ ~ 0 u u u ro V ~ ~ u ,jj 0 ~
0 ~ '5 ~ ~ ~ ro ro V I ~ "' '"
N ::> 0- V <( i= i= i= V V ~ "' u I
Q) Ci V U I I I V c 5 <5 5 c
Ol "0 U :c :c :c :c "0 2 2 " ro 0 ro
ro '" c '" ro ~ .0 <5 ~ <5 .0
il> ro ~ '" '" '" V V V 0 :'5 u :'5
D- ~ 0 ::J ::J ::J :;; ::J ::J :;; I :;; (fJ :;;
v '" 0 0
E <ri .0 <ri
0 '" N
1;;
~
0
~ '" 0 0
5 <ri .0 "
0; ~ '" N
." C
V 0
E z
8
0
v e- o 0
'5 " .0 <ri
E '" "
E
0
0
v '" 0
~ '" .0 <ri
0 '" "
V
E
0
~ I
c
0
~
'5
5
0 0- 0 0
" 0 '" .0 <ri
> 0; ti; '"
ro V
i= ~
v E
"0 0
.~ I
v
'"
~ '" 0 '"
5 <ri .0 N
S '" '"
V
E
0
I
v
~
~
"0
C
~
'"
:;; e
"' 0;
"- 2 0; ."
~ I ~ v
~ v E
iO ~ :2 "0
0, 0- .~ E
~ c .s v 0
v '" 0
'" ~ ~ ~
"0 ~ ~
'T 0 0- V ~
0 ~ v 0- 0-
~ ~ 0-
Q) N 0-
Ol Ci e ~ v
0- '0 '0 u
ro '" ~ ~ '"
D- il> '" 'of. 'of. 0
'T
'"
OJ
.e
:J
co
~
D
'"
Ol
C
~
X
w
>-
ro
5:
Q)
ro
(?
'"
ro
c
0
.i5J
Q)
>: [t:
ro -
ro
0 ro
-
(fJ 0
U
C 0
:J <(
0 -
D- >-
" ro
N (fJ 5:
oi to Q)
0 ro
c CL (? ~I 0 ~I '" ~ '"
0 Q) 0 "- "-
.Ui [t: - (f)
(fJ 0 " "
Q; (fJ 0 D N N
> C Q) D
'"
e- O 0
0 .w 0:: ~
0 (fJ >
N E c 0
Vl z ~I '" ~I '" ~ C;
E w ~ (') '"
Q) ill 0 N '"
.e :J N
::J C 52 >
s: CL '"
0 D
U 0< D (fJ
Q) (fJ '" W
C Q) () '" ~I '" ~ ;:: f- ~ "
~ '" <( '"
:0 0 D 0 '" :;; '"
- E D
E () '" >=
0 ro W 0 (fJ
0 ::2' <( w
>- c 0 z
::2' 0 [t: a
c .~ LL W
0 Q) LL (fJ '!2
> 0 w :;;
c !;( w
ro co c c ~
C 0 0 :;; <(
m ~ ~ >= Z
D U U a
- '" c (fJ
II! Q) Q) (fJ w >=
:J (fJ (fJ
Q) Ol 0 ro ro w z <(
:Q c 0 m m f- a '"
~ <( w
0 0 (fJ (fJ :;; W D-
LL X Q) c c >= (fJ a
u w ro 0 0 (fJ '0 ~ '0 0 '0
Q) >- ::2' .w .w w w z
ro ro (fJ (fJ v v <( v
Z 0; W 0; 0;
.c 5: c E E a '" ~ '" w '"
:;; (fJ Q) ro W W w ~ S! ~ 0 ~
D- '" ro (fJ '!2 E I E '" E
" (fJ (? Q) Q) :;; c W c ::> c
0 C (j (j ~ ~ a ~
'" 0 w G
,;; .c E E ,; ,; (fJ ,;
'" Q) ~ t W ro ~ ro ro
Q) Q) 0 <(
~ E () > > 0- 0 '2 <( '2 w '2
Q) ro 0 v '" ~ z ~ '" ~
'" ::> .0 a .0 .0
'" E z ..J U U ~ ~ <( ~
~ 0 ro ro '" a ~
0 ro 0 0 0 0 ~ (fJ (fJ (fJ u. (fJ
~ ~ a ~
Q) N Z Q) Q) [t: [t: E <( <( '" <( <(
Ol Ci .Q! 0 0 c 8 E w f- W f- :;; f-
ro '" 0:: 0:: ~ '" a D- a ::> a
D- il> u: 0 (fJ <( f- a f- (fJ f-
~I 0 0 0 ~ 0 '" '"
0 0 0 ~ e- e-
O 0 0 ~ :;; " "
V D- N N
0
.8
"0 ~
V "0
V V
0; C 0;
'" ro '"
~ ~I '" 0 '" ~ ~ >< '" '"
E 0 E
'" 0 '" V a
c 0 0 0 c Z N N
::> ~ ::>
,; ~
0 ,;
ro (fJ ro
0 ro 0
V v V ~
-< 0-
D- D- E V
~ ~
"0 ~I "0 0; C
c '" 0 0 e- '" c (9 ;:: ;:: c s:
13 0 0 0 e- '" 13 a V
0 0 0 0 0 '" '" '" E
D- D- c
V V 0
.8 ~
C C ro '"
C v 0
s: s: ~ (fJ 0
V N
(fJ (fJ 0- E 0
-" w w E 1;; " >
5 f- -" !;( '" ~ ~ 0
<( 5 .0
0- ~ ~ '0 z
v :;; 0- :;; ~ ro
c v ~ '"
'" >= 0 '" >= ro '"
(fJ .~ 0- C ~ ~
." ~ '0 (fJ '0 ~ 0;
w ." w .8
V E v v v ~ V e-
o Z 0; Z 0; 0
a w 0 c 0 0- 0
:;; "0 '" a '" 0 u E N
V (jj V ~ "0 (jj ~ u v v u
D- o; '!2 jl c ~ E v (fJ jl E ~ :0 f- ~
" '" :;; s: '" c 0; ~ c ~ 5 ~ E
~ ~ '" ~ 0 "'
'" ~ w U c ~ '" U "0 W
,;; E 0 ~ ~ ,; E w ,; c C;
c W Z 0 ro ~ ro ~ v V N
~ "0 C "0 "0 5
::> 0 0 0 '2 ::> <( '2 ~ ~ ~
'" '" Ii: ~ z ~ u u .~
v ~ e .0 .0 V
'" ~ ::> ro c V ~ 0; a ~ ~ 0; .~ .~ >- v
'" 0 ~ a (9 ." ~ c ~ ~ c >
0 0 (fJ ro E U (fJ 0 0- (fJ 0 <5 <5 ~
N (fJ e u 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c .~
Q) Ci <( oS ~ ~ <( '" v <( '" u
Ol ~ "0 ~ :c V V ~ ~ ~
ro W ~ c 5 f- W u f- v v 0;
ro '" v '" 0; v u a 0- D- '" a 0- 0 0 E
D- il> .<: ro .<: 'f
<( Z I ~ 0 f- a a a f- a 0 0 w
" N " 0 0 '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 V "
~ 0 0 0 '" '" e- O 0 0 0 0 0 E '"
V N '" e- O 0 0 0
f- '" '" is 1;;
:;; ~
> 6 6 0
e- e-
O; " "
<5 " "
f-
~ "
5 '"
0; ~
~ '" '" ." C
0- '" '" v 0
~ <ri <ri 1;; '" "' 0 0 " e- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E z
N N '" '" e- O 0 ;: '" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E
0; e-. e-. 0; '" '" 0 0 '" N "' 0
<5 0; 0
f- 0 0
V "'
'5 <ri
E
2) '" E
'" 0
.c 0
::> ;;;
0
z
1;; N '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0; "' V "'
v '" 0;
0- rr y ~ '"
~ ~ c 0
.- 0 0 V
0 z
c 0 E
::> 0
~ x I
v
~ ~
::> V
"0 V "
C 0; v
ro '" <'i u:
~ v 0- '"
'0 0- 0 '"
~ ~ ~
V '" '" e- '" '" '" 0 " 0; (fJ
~ 0-
~ V ~ '" ;:: 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ~ V
"' N
E C v 8
E "0
~ V V .~ I
(fJ '" u v
ro V '"
~ D-
u
<(
~ '"
5 6
S
v
8
I
~
~ ~ ,Q
~ ,Q ,Q 0
0
,Q 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 ci
0 o. '" '?
0 " '? C;
~ ~ ci "'
:;; ,Q ,Q C; 0 o. 2
D- ~ 0 0 0 o. '" I
" ,Q "' 0 0 ci " '"
'" e- "' "' ~
0 '\' "i' '" ~ u ~
,;; "' ~ ~ ~
e- u u u i= 0,
~ v '" "' "' ~ ~ ~ C
0- e- i=
~ v v '" e- i= i= S' v
"' v ~
'" ~ 0- ~ ~ ~ S' S' S' ro ~ v ~ E 0-
(') 0 v ~ ~ 0 u u u ro v ~ ~ u ,jj 0 ~
0 ~ '5 ~ ~ ~ ro ro v I ~ "' '"
N ::> 0- V <( i= i= i= v v ~ "' u I
Q) Ci v U I I I V c 5 <5 5 c
Ol "0 U :c :c :c :c "0 2 2 " ro 0 ro
ro '" c '" ro ~ .0 <5 ~ <5 .0
il> ro ~ '" '" '" v v v 0 :'5 u :'5
D- ~ 0 ::J ::J ::J :;; ::J ::J :;; I :;; (fJ :;;
v '" 0 0
E <ri .0 <ri
0 '" N
1;;
~
0
~ '" 0 0
5 <ri .0 "
0; ~ '" N
." C
V 0
E z
8
0
v e- o 0
'5 " .0 <ri
E '" "
E
0
0
v '" 0
~ '" .0 <ri
0 '" "
V
E
0
~ I
c
0
~
'5
5
0 0- 0 0
" 0 '" .0 <ri
> 0; ti; '"
ro V
i= ~
v E
"0 0
.~ I
v
'"
~ '" 0 '"
5 <ri .0 N
S '" '"
V
E
0
I
v
~
~
"0
C
~
'"
:;; e
"' 0;
D- 2 0; ."
" I ~ v
'" v E
,;; ~ :2 "0
0, 0- .~ E
~ c .s v 0
v '" 0
'" ~ ~ ~
"0 ~ ~
'T 0 0- V ~
0 ~ v 0- 0-
~ ~ 0-
Q) N 0-
Ol Ci e ~ v
0- '0 '0 u
ro '" ~ ~ '"
D- il> '" 'of. 'of. 0
'T
'"
OJ
.e
:J
D
'"
D
'"
Ol
C
~
X
w
>-
ro
5:
Q)
ro
(?
'"
ro
c
0
i5J
Q)
>: [t:
ro -
ro
0 ro
-
(fJ 0
U
C 0
:J <(
0 -
D- >-
" ro
N (fJ 5:
oi to Q)
0 ro
c CL (? ~I 0 ~I 0 ~ 0
0 Q) 0 " "
.Ui [t: - (f)
(fJ 0 0 0
Q; (fJ 0 D " "
> C Q) D
'"
e- O 0
0 .w 0:: ~
0 (fJ >
N E c 0
Vl z ~I '" ~I '" ~ "'
E w ~ (') '" '" "'
Q) ill '" "'
.e :J N
::J C 52 >
s: CL '"
0 D
U 0< D (fJ
Q) (fJ '" W
C Q) () '" ~I 0 ~ '" f- ~ '"
:0 0 ~ D '" '" <( '"
- E D '" :;; ;::
E () '" >=
0 ro W 0 (fJ
0 ::2' <( w
>- c 0 z
::2' 0 [t: a
c .~ LL (jj
0 Q) LL (fJ '!2
> 0 w :;;
c !;( w
ro c c ~
C 0 0 :;; <(
m ~ >= z
- :J C U U (fJ a
II! ~ :J Q) Q) (fJ w >=
(fJ (fJ
Q) Ol 0 ro ro w z <(
:Q c 0 m m f- a '"
~ <( w
0 0 (fJ (fJ :;; (jj D-
LL X Q) c c >= (fJ a
u w ro 0 0 (fJ '0 ~ '0 0 '0
Q) >- ::2' .w .w w w z
ro ro (fJ (fJ v v <( v
Z 0; W 0; 0;
.c 5: c E E a '" ~ '" w '"
:;; (fJ Q) ro W W (jj ~ S! ~ 0 ~
D- '" ro (fJ '!2 E I E '" E
'" (fJ (? Q) Q) :;; c W c ::> c
0 C (j (j ~ ~ a ~
N 0 w G
;:. .c E E ,; ,; (fJ ,;
'" Q) ~ t W ro ~ ro ro
Q) Q) 0 <(
~ E () > > 0- 0 '2 <( '2 w '2
Q) ro 0 v '" ~ z ~ '" ~
'" ::> .0 a .0 .0
'" E z ..J U U ~ ~ <( ~
~ 0 ro ro '" a ~
0 ro 0 0 0 0 ~ (fJ (fJ (fJ u. (fJ
~ ~ a ~
Q) N Z Q) Q) [t: [t: E <( <( '" <( <(
Ol Ci .Q! 0 0 c 8 E w f- W f- :;; f-
ro '" 0:: 0:: ~ '" a D- a ::> a
D- il> u: 0 (fJ <( f- a f- (fJ f-
~I 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
0 0 0 ~ " "
0 0 0 ~ :;; 0 0
V D- " "
0
.8
"0 ~
V "0
V V
0; C 0;
'" ro '"
~ ~I '" 0 '" ~ ~ >< '" '"
E 0 E
'" 0 '" V 0 '" '"
c 0 c Z '" '"
::> ~ ::>
,; ~
0 ,;
ro (fJ ro
0 ro 0
V v V ~
-< 0-
D- D- E V
~ ~
"0 ~I "0 0; C
c " 0 0 '" 0 c (9 '" '" c s:
13 0 0 '" '" 13 0 '" '" v
0 0 0 '" '" '" E
D- D- c
V V 0
.8 ~
C C ro '"
C v 0
s: s: ~ (fJ 0
V N
(fJ (fJ 0- E 0
-" w w E 1;; " >
5 f- -" !;( '" ~ ~ 0
<( 5 .0
0- ~ ~ '0 z
v :;; 0- :;; ~ ro
c v ~ '"
'" >= 0 '" >= ro '"
(fJ .~ 0- C ~ ~
." ~ '0 (fJ '0 ~ 0;
w ." w .8
V E v v v ~ V e-
o Z 0; Z 0; 0
0 w 0 c 0 0- 0
:;; "0 '" 0 '" 0 u E N
V (jj V ~ "0 (jj ~ u v v u
D- O; '!2 jl c ~ E v (fJ jl E ~ :0 f- ~
'" '" :;; s: '" c 0; ~ c ~ 5 ~ E
~ ~ '" ~ 0 0
N ~ W U c ~ '" U "0 N W
;:. E 0 ~ ~ ,; E w ,; c 0
c W Z 0 ro ~ ro ~ v V N
~ "0 C "0 "0 5
::> 0 0 0 '2 ::> <( '2 ~ ~ ~
'" '" Ii: ~ z ~ u u .~
v ~ e .0 .0 V
'" ~ ::> ro c V ~ 0; 0 ~ ~ 0; .~ .~ >- v
'" 0 ~ 0 (9 ." ~ c ~ ~ c >
0 0 (fJ ro E U (fJ 0 0- (fJ 0 <5 <5 ~
N (fJ e u 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c .~
Q) Ci <( oS ~ ~ <( '" v <( '" u
Ol ~ "0 ~ :c V V ~ ~ ~
ro W ~ c 5 f- W u f- v v 0;
ro '" v '" 0; v u 0 0- D- '" 0 0- 0 0 E
D- il> .<: ro .<: 'f
<( Z I ~ 0 f- 0 0 0 f- 0 0 0 W
" 0 '" 0 0 '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 V "
~ 0 0 0 0 '" '" e- O 0 0 0 0 0 E '"
V N '" e- O 0 0 0
f- " " is 1;;
:;; '" '" ~
> 6 6 0
'" '"
0; "' "'
<5 '" '"
f- N N
~ "
5 '"
0; ~
~ " " ." C
0- " " v 0
~ " " 1;; 0 0 0 " e- N 0 0 0 e- O 0 E z
'" 0 '" 0 0 ;: '" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 E
0; '" '" 0; 0 '" 0 0 '" N '" 0
<5 N N 0; 0
f- 0 0
V "'
'5 <ri
E
2) 0 E
0 0
.c " 0
::> '"
0 N
Z
1;; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0
'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0
0; '" V "'
v '" 0;
0- rr y ~ '"
~ ~ c 0
.- 0 0 V
0 z
c 0 E
::> 0
~ x I
v
~ ~
::> V
"0 V
C 0; '" v
ro '" <ri u:
~ v 0- '"
'0 0- 0 '"
~ ~ ~
V '" e- O '" e- '" '" '" 0 " 0; (fJ
~ 0-
~ V ~ '" ;:: 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ~ V
"' N
E C v 8
E "0
~ V V .~ I
(fJ '" u v
ro V '"
~ D-
u
<(
~ '"
5 6
S
v
8
I
~
~ ~ ,Q
~ ,Q ,Q 0
0
,Q 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 ci
0 o. '" '?
0 " '? C;
~ ~ ci "'
:;; ,Q ,Q C; 0 o. 2
D- ~ 0 0 0 o. '" I
'" ,Q "' 0 0 ci " '"
N e- "' "' ~
0 '\' "i' '" ~ u ~
;:. "' ~ ~ ~
e- u u u i= 0,
~ v '" "' "' ~ ~ ~ C
0- e- i=
~ v v '" e- i= i= S' v
"' v ~
'" ~ 0- ~ ~ ~ S' S' S' ro ~ v ~ E 0-
(') 0 v ~ ~ 0 u u u ro v ~ ~ u ,jj 0 ~
0 ~ '5 ~ ~ ~ ro ro v I ~ "' '"
N ::> 0- V <( i= i= i= v v ~ "' u I
Q) Ci v U I I I V c 5 <5 5 c
Ol "0 U :c :c :c :c "0 2 2 " ro 0 ro
ro '" c '" ro ~ .0 <5 ~ <5 .0
il> ro ~ '" '" '" v v v 0 :'5 u :'5
D- ~ 0 ::J ::J ::J :;; ::J ::J :;; I :;; (fJ :;;
v '" 0 0
E <ri .0 <ri
0 '" N
1;;
~
0
~ '" 0 0
5 <ri .0 "
0; ~ '" N
." C
V 0
E z
8
0
v e- o 0
'5 " .0 <ri
E '" "
E
0
0
v '" 0
~ '" .0 <ri
0 '" "
V
E
0
~ I
c
0
~
'5
5
0 0- 0 0
" 0 '" .0 <ri
> 0; ti; '"
ro V
i= ~
v E
"0 0
.~ I
v
'"
~ '" 0 '"
5 <ri .0 N
S '" '"
V
E
0
I
v
~
~
"0
C
~
'"
:;; e
"' 0;
D- 2 0; ."
'" I ~ V
N v E
;:. ~ :2 "0
0, 0- .~ E
~ c .s v 0
v '" 0
'" ~ ~ ~
"0 ~ ~
'T 0 0- V ~
0 ~ v 0- 0-
~ ~ 0-
Q) N 0-
Ol Ci e ~ v
0- '0 '0 u
ro '" ~ ~ '"
D- il> '" 'of. 'of. 0
SIMPLIFIED CALINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Background Information
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
Sail Frallcisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Illtersectioll
AllalysisCollditioll
Oyster Poillt alld Dubuque
Near-Term Future Wth Project
North-South Roadway
East-lIVest Roadway
RoadwavTvpe
AtGrade
At Grade
No.of
Lalles
4
8
AveraqeSpeed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
Dubuque
OysterPoillt
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolumes
N
N
w
E
404
~
~
w
E
'~
< 910
~
570'
1021>
591v
374'
-----no >
~v
641
82
888
611
187
230
s
s
Highest TrafficVolumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
2,493
3,018
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
3,177
5,004
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissiolls=(AxBxC)/100,000'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferellceCOCmcertratiort5 Traffic Emissioll EsumatedCOCmcertratiort5
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet V~ume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 33 26 22 17 2,493 2.55 0.21 Cl.17 Cl.14 0.11
East-lIVest Road 85 57 46 34 3,018 2.55 0.65 0.44 0.35 0.26
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 33 26 22 17 3,177 2.55 027 Cl.21 Cl.18 0.14
East-lIVest Road 85 57 46 34 5,004 2.55 1.09 073 0.59 0.43
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour Emissiolls = North-South COllcelltratioll + East-West COllcelltratian + Backgroulld 1-hour COllcelltraboll'
8-Hour Emissiolls = ((Highest Peak Hour COllcelltratioll - Backgroulld I-hour COllcelltratioll) x Persistellce Factor) + Backgroulld 8-hour COllcelltratioll'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
---r:r-
31
30
28
PM
Peak Hour
----rg--
34
33
31
8-Hour
~
23
21
20
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
4. oyster point cndOubuqLRnea-.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Oyster Point Blvd/US101 & Gateway Blvd
Near-Term Future With Project
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
6
8
GatevvayBlvd
Oyster Point
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
N
76
218
w
E
o
~
------m
w
0'
3422>
730v
0'
-----ns >
------s3 v
133
388
886
s
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,354
5,042
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,250
5,362
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
E
o
< 3439
v 155
126
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 28 23 20 17 1,354 2.55 0.10 0.08 007 0.06
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 5,042 2.55 1.09 Cl73 0.59 0.44
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 28 23 20 17 1,250 2.55 0.09 007 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 5,362 2.55 1.16 Cl78 0.63 0.47
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background 1-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
---rr-
33
32
30
PM
Peak Hour
~
34
32
30
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
6. Oyster Point-US 1 01 near.xls
8-Hour
~
22
21
20
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Oyster Point and Veterans Brvd
Near-Term Future Wth Project
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
At Grade
No.of
Lanes
2
6
Veterans Blvd
Oyster Point
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolumes
N
N
145
23
338
w
E
24
------s36
~
w
783'
2606>
424v
222'
------s6'O >
~v
90
488
s
s
Highest TrafficVolumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
385
4,584
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
666
4,445
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
AveraqeSpeed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
12
E
23
< 2692
" 2
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCmcertrations Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcertrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet V~ume FactCl'"s' E.O.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 37 27 22 17 385 2.55 0.09 007 (106 004
East-\!VestRoad 35 61 43 35 4,584 2.55 1.11 Cl71 Cl57 OAl
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 37 27 22 17 666 2.55 OCl6 0.05 004 003
East-\!VestRoad 35 61 43 35 4,445 2.55 1.08 Cl69 Cl56 DAD
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour Emissions = North-South Concentration + East-West Concentratian + Background 1-hour COllcentraboll'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentration) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
---rr-
33
31
30
PM
Peak Hour
~
32
31
23
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
7. Oyster Point-Vet l19iT.xls
8-Hour
~
21
20
19
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
EastGrand and Gateway Blvd
Near-Term Future Wth Project
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
6
8
Gatevvay
East Grand
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolumes
N
N
114
363
13
w
E
66
~
~
w
189'
2145>
6h
127'
~>
------rg v
48
88
433
71
s
s
Highest TrafficVolumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
863
3,499
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,175
2,791
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
AveraqeSpeed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
514
127
E
88
< 1635
v 378
48
85
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCmcertrations Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcertrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet V~ume FactCl'"s' E.O.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 28 23 20 17 863 2.55 OD6 0.05 0[14 0[14
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 3,499 2.55 0.76 D51 DAl 0.30
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 28 23 20 17 1,175 2.55 0.08 om 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 2,791 2.55 0.61 DAl D33 0.24
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Menagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour Emissions = North-South Concentration + East-West Concentratian + Background 1-hour COllcentraboll'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentration) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
~
31
30
28
PM
Peak Hour
----rr-
30
28
28
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Menagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
14. East Gram end Gateway near.xls
8-Hour
----u--
20
18
18
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Airport BlvdIProduce Ave & San Mateo Ave
Near-Term Future With Project
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
No.of Averaqe Speed
RoadwavTvpe Lanes AM PM
At Grade 8 5 5
AtGrade 8 5 5
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
86 1006 155
W E
149' 400
~> ~
-----nT v -----r:m
83 28 184
S
N-SRoad 2,866
E-WRoad 2,510
AirportBPid
San Mateo
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
N
82 657 145
W E
62' 180
-----ns > ------nT
------rr1 v ~
237 42 342
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad 1,780
E-WRoad 1,551
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 1,780 2.55 0.39 CU6 0.21 0.15
East-\!VestRoad 26 22 18 16 1,557 2.55 0.10 [J09 0.08 0.06
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 2,866 2.55 0.62 Cl42 034 0.25
East-\!VestRoad 26 22 18 16 2,510 2.55 0.11 [J14 0.12 0.10
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background 1-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----ro-
28
28
27
PM
Peak Hour
~
31
30
28
8-Hour
----u--
20
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
16. Airpcrt blvd-produce nea-.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park Near-Term Project
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2015
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Gateway Blvd/South Airport BPid & MitchellAve
Near-Term Future With Project
North-South Roadway Gatevvay
East-\!VestRoadway San Mateo
AM Peak HourTrafficVolumes
N
200 133
W E
80' 7
~> -----m1
-----;rro v ~
478 483 548
RoadwavTvpe
AtGrade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
8
6
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
s
737 220
W E
35' 3
~> ~
-----;wT v -----n6
511 158 71
S
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
2,087
1,557
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,478
2,510
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 2,087 2.55 0.45 CUO 0.24 0.18
East-\!VestRoad 28 23 20 17 1,557 2.55 Clll Cl09 0.08 007
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 26 22 18 16 1,478 2.55 0.10 Cl.08 007 0.Cl6
East-\!VestRoad 95 61 48 35 2,510 2.55 0.61 CU9 0.31 Cl22
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background l-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----rr-
28
28
27
PM
Peak Hour
----rr-
30
28
28
8-Hour
----rr-
18
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
17. gateway-mitchell near.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Airport Blvd & US10l Southbound Off-Ramp
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
4
2
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
AirportBPid
US1IJl Off-Ramp
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
N
715
758
736
781
w
E
23
-----0
~
w
E
35
-----0
-----sB"9
0'
-----0,
-----0"
0'
-----0,
-----0"
412
111
338
286
s
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,809
1,381
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,958
1,711
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 119 70 54 38 1,889 1.62 0.37 o.n 017 0.12
East-\!VestRoad 37 27 22 17 1,381 1.62 0.08 [J06 0.05 0.04
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 119 70 54 38 1,959 1.62 0.38 on 017 0.12
East-\!VestRoad 37 27 22 17 1,711 1.62 0.10 am 0.06 005
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background l-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----ro-
28
27
27
PM
Peak Hour
~
28
27
27
8-Hour
----rg--
18
18
17
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
1. arpcrt-us101 master.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Oyster Point Blvd & US101 Northbound Off-Ramp
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
AtGrade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
6
4
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
US101 N Off-Ramp
Oyster Point
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
N
887 215
W E
~^ 3
0> -----,
-----mo v ----0
62 164
2238 258
W E
826^ 2
----0 > -----,
~v ----0
141 418
S
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
2,812
2,680
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
3,748
3,326
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 61 48 35 2,912 1.62 0.45 CU9 0.23 0.17
East-\!VestRoad 33 26 22 17 2,680 1.62 0.14 0.11 0.10 007
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 61 48 35 3,748 1.62 0.58 Cl.37 038 0.21
East-\!VestRoad 33 26 22 17 3,326 1.62 0.18 814 0.12 009
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background 1-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----rr-
28
28
27
PM
Peak Hour
~
30
28
28
8-Hour
----rr-
20
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
5. Oyster Point & US1 01 N Off master.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Oyster Point Blvd/US10l Southbound Off Ramp & Gateway Blvd
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
AtGrade
AtGrade
No of
Lanes
6
8
Gatevvay
Oyster Point
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
N
84
241
w
E
o
< 1010
v 105
w
0'
4555>
985v
0'
1060>
121v
178
683
1,201
s
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,961
6,812
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,761
7,348
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
E
o
< 4725
v 260
178
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 28 23 20 17 1,961 1.62 0.09 om 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 6,812 1.62 0.94 [)63 0.51 0.38
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 28 23 20 17 1,761 1.62 0.08 om 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 7,348 1.62 1.01 [)68 0.55 0.41
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background l-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----rs-
32
31
29
PM
Peak Hour
~
32
31
30
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
6. Oyster Point-US 1 01 master.xls
8-Hour
~
21
20
19
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2020
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Oyster Point and Veterans Brvd
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
At Grade
No.of
Lanes
2
6
Veterans Blvd
Oyster Point
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolumes
N
N
175
23
433
w
E
24
-----sso
~
w
803'
3925>
412v
290'
------s73 >
~v
90
488
s
s
Highest TrafficVolumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,136
6,355
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
778
6,217
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
AveraqeSpeed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
12
E
28
<~
" ---"2
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCmcertrations Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcertrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet V~ume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 37 27 22 17 1,136 1.62 007 0.05 0[14 003
East-\!VestRoad 35 61 43 35 6,355 1.62 0.98 0.63 Cl51 0.36
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 37 27 22 17 778 1.62 0.05 OCl3 003 002
East-\!VestRoad 35 61 43 35 6,217 1.62 0.96 Cl62 ClA9 0.35
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour Emissions = North-South Concentration + East-West Concentratian + Background 1-hour COllcentraboll'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentration) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----rs-
32
30
28
PM
Peak Hour
~
31
38
23
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
7. Oyster Point-Vet master.xls
8-Hour
~
21
20
19
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Airport Blvd &GrandAve
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
8
6
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
AirportBPid
Grand BPid
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
N
118
534
1203
216
353
283
w
E
85
~
------no
w
E
287
------soB
-----sB"'7
403'
~>
-----n6 v
179'
-----uT >
------s3 v
40
348
214
48
378
133
s
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,707
2,035
2,783
2,389
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 2,703 1.62 0.37 Cl.25 0.28 0.15
East-\!VestRoad 28 23 20 17 2,389 1.62 811 [J09 0.08 007
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 26 22 18 16 1,7[)7 1.62 007 Cl.06 0.05 0.04
East-\!VestRoad 95 61 48 35 2,035 1.62 0.31 [)20 0.16 0.12
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background l-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----ro-
28
28
27
PM
Peak Hour
~
28
27
27
8-Hour
----rg--
18
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
11. Airpcrt-Grcnd master.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2020
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
EastGrand and Gateway Blvd
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
RoadwavTvpe
At Grade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
6
8
Gatevvay
East Grand
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
PM PeakHourTrafficVolumes
N
N
10
128
388
21
w
E
74
~
-----ri3
w
215'
2933>
76"
142'
~>
------s7 v
53
116
603
78
s
s
Highest TrafficVolumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,150
4,630
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,776
3,653
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/100,000'
AveraqeSpeed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
762
148
E
125
< 1979
v 668
54
127
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCmcertrations Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcertrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet V~ume FactCl'"s' E.O.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 28 23 20 17 1,15C1 1.62 0.05 0.04 0[14 003
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 4,630 1.62 064 CI.43 CI.35 0.26
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-SouthRoad 28 23 20 17 1,776 1.62 0.08 007 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 85 57 46 34 3,653 1.62 0.50 CI.34 CI.27 0.20
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Menagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour Emissions = North-South Concentration + East-West Concentratian + Background l-hour COllcentraboll'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentration) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
~
38
28
28
PM
Peak Hour
----rr-
28
28
28
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Menagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
14. East Gram end Gateway master.xls
8-Hour
----rr-
18
18
18
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund 1-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Airport BlvdIProduce Ave & San Mateo Ave
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway
East-\!VestRoadway
No.of Averaqe Speed
RoadwavTvpe Lanes AM PM
At Grade 8 5 5
AtGrade 8 5 5
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
104 1066 167
W E
160' 450
-----n1 > ~
-----n4 v ~
55 31 210
S
N-SRoad 3,749
E-WRoad 3,449
AirportBPid
San Mateo
A.M Peak HourTraffic Volumes
N
88 686 153
W E
68' 183
~> ~
~v ~
250 45 361
s
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad 1,947
E-WRoad 1,n9
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 1,947 1.62 027 CU8 0.15 0.11
East-\!VestRoad 26 22 18 16 1,729 1.62 001 [J06 0.05 0.04
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 3,749 1.62 0.52 Cl.35 0.28 0.21
East-\!VestRoad 26 22 18 16 3,449 1.62 0.15 812 0.11 009
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background 1-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background 1-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----s-s-
27
27
27
PM
Peak Hour
----rr-
30
28
28
8-Hour
----rr-
18
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District BAAQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
16. Airpcrt blvd-produce master.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
SIMPLIFIED CAlINE4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
Project Title: Gateway Business Park MasterPlan
Backgroundlnformuion
NearestAir Monitoring Station measuring CO
Backgmund l-hour CO Concentration (ppm)
Background 8-hourCO Concentration (ppm)
Persistence Factor
Ana~sisYear
San Francisco
25
16
07
2820
RoadwavData
Intersection
Analysis Condition
Gateway Blvd/South Airport BPid & MitchellAve
FutureWthProject
North-South Roadway Gatevvay
East-\!VestRoadway San Mateo
AM Peak HourTrafficVolumes
N
273 146
W E
88^ 8
~> ~
~v -----,.,
586 688 718
RoadwavTvpe
AtGrade
AtGrade
No.of
Lanes
8
6
Averaqe Speed
A.M PM
5 5
5 5
PM PeakHourTrafficVolu~s
N
s
1321 242
W E
38^ 3
-----us > --------gso
~v -----no
550 204 78
S
Highest Traffic Volumes (Vehicles per Hour)
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
1,815
3,449
2,508
1,729
N-SRoad
E-WRoad
Roadway CO Contributions and Concentrations
Emissions=(AxBxC)/lOO,OOO'
A, A, A, A, 6 C
ReferenceCOCorcertrctions Traffic Emission EsumatedCOCmcentrations
Roadwav E.0.R 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume FactCl'"s' E.OR 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet
A.M. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 85 57 46 34 2,508 1.62 0.35 on 0.19 0.14
East-\!VestRoad 28 23 20 17 1,729 1.62 0.08 [J06 0.06 005
PM. Peak Traffic Hour
Nortre-South Road 26 22 18 16 1,816 1.62 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.05
East-\!VestRoad 95 61 48 35 3,449 1.62 0.53 834 027 1120
1 Methodology frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
2 Emission factcrs from EMFAC2007 (2007). Assumes temperatlXe of 60 degrees F and a relatively humidity of 60010
Total Roadway CO Concentrations
Peak Hour ElTissions = North-South Concentrabon + East-\!VestConcentration + Background l-hourConcentration'
8-Hour Emissions = ((Highest Peak Hour Concentration - Background l-hour Concentratiorl) x Persistence Factor) + Background 8-hour Concentration'
Roadway Edge
25 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
50 Feetfrom Roadway Edge
100 Feet from Roadway Edge
AM
Peak Hour
----rg--
28
27
27
PM
Peak Hour
----rr-
28
28
27
8-Hour
----s-o-
18
18
18
2 MethodolO]y frem Bay Area Air Quality Mcnagement District B4AQMD CEQA Guide/lnes( 1996).
17. gateway-mitchell master.xls
Christoph2rA. Joseph Associates
~~ "
tiJ?:; '" ~ N '" 01 01 '" '" 0; on ~ 00 01 on '0 01 "
0 0 0 0""'; 0""'; ,.....;r...: on 00 0"""; '0 O~ ~
"'", on
;:8P=1 01
~e
e..1
0
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e..1 ~ ~ e..1 ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~~ ~
~ 0 p., ~
'" 0 ~~
.;; p., ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
0 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. p., ~
p., 0 0 0 0 ~o ~o ~o 0 ~o ~o ~ ~o
"0 U Z "" "" "" P'l"" P'l"" P'l"" r/l P'l"" P'l"" Z P'l"" P'l Z
" ~
~
~
0 c)
..
p., z
" i2 i2 ~ i2 i2
-= ~
~ ;;; i2 i2 ;;; i2 e..1 ;;; ;;;
"" ~
0 i2 i2 i2 ~ i2
..!: ~ ;;; ;;; ~ ;;; P'l ~ ~
e..1 i2 e..1 e..1 e..1 ~
~ ~ ;;; ;;; ;;; ~ "" ~ ~ ;;;
~ ~ ~ 0
0 e..1 ;;; e..1 0 e..1 0 0
::': P'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P'l ~ ~ P'l P'l ~ ~
.... e..1 e..1 e..1 e..1
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
= Z P'l e..1 0 0 P'l 0 Z P'l ~ Z Z 0 e..1 Z
:E 5 r/l ~ P'l P'l r/l P'l 5 r/l 5 5 P'l ~ ~
'" ~ 0 ~ ~ 0
i$ p., P'l ::( ::( ::( p., P'l p., p., ::( P'l
~ ~ r/l ~ ~ ~ ~ r/l r/l
.~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:= '" ~ ~ gJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gJ e..1
~ r/l g: ~ ~ g: ~ r/l g: ~ r/l r/l ~ U
'u ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 u
" 0 "" c) c) c) 0 c) 0 0 c) "" ~
r-, ~ 0 0 0
"" ~ ~ on on ~ " ~ on on 0 0; '" ~ 0 0
0 " ~ on on on ~ 0 " ~ 0 " " 00 " e-
~ '" ~ " 0; '0 ~ 00 '" ~ e- '" '" '0 " on
"
.;:
0 ~
~ ~
= ~
" u ~
> Z e..1 ;:1
= r/l U U
"" ~ p., CJ
= r/l 5 ~ 25 25 ~
.S; e..1 ~ p.,
~ cJ u ~ ~ r/l r/l r/l r/l' ~ ~
~ ~ ~
.~ z ~ p., EJ e..1 EJ ii2
= ~ ~ e..1 cJ
~ ~ e..1 c) @ @ ~
~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ r/l c)
~ r/l r/l CJ r/l e..1 U ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ tJ (3
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 "" u ~ ~
r/l ~ ~ ~ "" r/l ~ r/l
~ ~ 0 0 u 0 gj ~
~ 0 ~ g; u ::( 55 u ~ 55 Q
0 ~ e..1 U ~ U
~ ~ ~ ~ e..1 ~ P2 u
~ r/l ~ "" ~ z
p., ~ p; r/l p., 0 ~ ~ ",,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ u 25
r/l ~ r/l 25
r/l ~ 5 5 P'l ~ g: ~ 0"
~ "" c) @ c) 0
~ ~ c) 0 z c) 0 0 ~
~ ~ r/l ~ ~ ~ 5 c) ~ c) 5 @ e..1
0 r/l r/l r/l ~ ~
e..1 5 ~ 0 ~ ~ e..1 ~
r/l r/l tJ P'l ~ ~ ~ ~ c) r/l
0 '0 00 ~ 0; 00 e- 00 ~ 0 on " " " 01
S '" 01 e- '0 0 0; '0 01 0 00 on 0; 00 '0 e-
~ '0 e- 00 0 e- " '" 0; 01 '" '" on '0 '0
'" '" '" '" " " on '0 '0 e- e- e- e- e- e-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(fJ
Q)
~
ro
.u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
.-<
....
o
.-<
(fJ
.!!d
:!::
u
~
"
~
" '" " '" N N
'"
= ~ 0 0 0 0 0
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
.~ OL " N 0 N 0
~ " 0 0 " 00
'5 N '" ~ ~ ~
~
=
.51
~ "
.~ i:< ~
0, ~ " 00
= " 0 ~ on 0
"0 >0 >0 '"
"0;: ~
..i:< N N 00 N
~
.;
~
"
"
= N N N N
" = ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
"
~
"
~ '"
= " ~ ~ ~ ~
.51 ~ " N 0 0
" " on
~ ~ '" N N ~ 0
~ " N 00 on
'5 ~
~
"
S
"
'" =
'"' .51 '"
.:< o .- ~ 0, 00 00
" ~ ~ = 0 N 00 '"
= .~ ~Olci 0 ~ 0
'" = 0 0
'"' ~
" '"'
~
" 0 e-
~ ~ 0
0
"'N
~ 6u
~ c8~
"
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '@~
" '"' ~ ~ ~ u~
u ~ ~ ~ = =
:E e..1 e..1
0 0
~ <.b<.b
e- ~
0 v
0 U
N :E
~
c8 v
~ "
~~
"0 ~~
'"e- " ~ N
~i:i 0 ~ 0,
00 " 00 ~o
.s. 'D N a~
E=< ._ v
tJ u
~
8&
"'"0
"0 =
v '"
bDEJ
~ v v v ~::I ~~
.:< ~ ~ ~
" ~'"' [:; =
=
'" onO "@ g
'"' N '" " '"' ~ ~
v j .;!l
~ =
0
z ~
(fJ
Q)
~
ro
.u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
Lrl
....
o
.-<
(fJ
c
.Q
(fJ
.'!2
E
LJ.J
(fJ
Q)
~
ro
.u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
"
= ~ ~ ~ ~
E::: ~ "I "I "I
g ~ ~ ~ ~
'[<
"
..
"
~
= 01 01 ~ ~
..
~ 0 0 00
~ ~ + '
t: ~~
'" 00 "'~
0 01 '" ~ e-
-= ~ ~ 0i"
= '"
.S;
~
"
:;
"
;;
u
=
.S; 01 '" 01 '"
~ ;;
" 0 0 0 0
.. = ~ ~ ~ ~
~ =
= = 01 '0 00 N
" ~ 00 '" 00
" ~
= '" ~ ~ ~
0
U
..
:.;;:
V "0
-=
"0 I]; 0 ~
= V ~ g
= ~ =
9 V V oj oj
p., N "0 ~.,s
= ;;
= ~ V E! ~~
0 P'1 "
U 0 ~
'"' ~
~
Lrl
....
o
N
c
.Q
~
ro
~
~
C
Q)
U
C
o
U
1..2! ~
;t: ~I t '"d 1:-< "'d
=.-I<''''~
P a"O ."
::l a
..
"
~
=
"
u
"
..
"
u
I~
~ "
';l ::l
:E~
:E
u
..
..2
~
..
o
~
'"
"
....
"
..
::l
~
~
..
~
o
'flOG If)
r--tnQlf)'f)
o01\D ~
.. I G =
o '1) !:: '1) 0 'l.)
1:: ~I 2 S".;j S
~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~
.... = 1:: v;:: !2i
".9'"' ,,~ "
l. -+-> '1) ;:J '1)":::1
s; ~ !3 i3 !3 ~
IS: ro (/J R 0 ~
1;:;"B19&j "J;<
~ ~I~ r.Ll ~
~
.;!l
>,
'"
=
v
~
v
'"
v
S
~
o
~
v
v
,8
1"[
v
~
v ~
~ a ~
o v v
F=;~ ~
~~ .B
~ ~ !::
~ oj v
0"" V
'-/~ E;
B ~ '1)
ro 0 >-.~
~~.@ ;3
.s ~ I-< (/J
....c: 't:l '1) '1)
~!::;;a
~ ~ !3 ~
,..D t::: 0 0
" "" ~
000 '"d
.g~'-<B
"5 g 6.~
04-< 4=< 0...
'"d '1) (/J.u
'1)....c: 6..-<
"'d-+-> ~
!:: -+-> 0 cd
V oj 11
S 1:: ;:j ~
s '1) 0 cd
o ~ 1:: C
a5 a ~ ~
I-; '1) '1) U
~,..D CL..s
o >> '1) '1)
"'d.........."'01-<
~ 6:::: ~
cd ...........~ >.,
,..D;;::::: ;> cd
.;::3 t::: "'d "'d
'1) !::;;:::: '1)
~'1)..g~
~:9 ttl ~
.g ~ ~ 5
~] ~ 8.tl
""' cd u ;:l..........
~"" = ~.-
o !:: ...... eIl....c:
z~"'.;:u
(fJ
Q)
~
ro
.u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
'<0
"0
g
s
o
~
=
o
~
u
v
r/l
v
"0
o
~
c2l
oj
r/l
"0
=
oj
:E
~ oj
.s ~
v 0
"O~
.- ~
::l =
o g
" ~
a&
~ 1::
v v
:2 a
.;: :2
~ ~
p:l..'l:
a~
ap:l
on
o v
P:;~
.go
""0
r/l.;J
~r/l
o "
~c8
~
u v
.~ g
o oj
~"O
.!:1 ;J
';:0
~c'
'" "
00
00
~~
.;:.;:
v~~
u~~
S ~ ~
aoo
(fJ
~
o
~
u
~
Q)
~
::J
(fJ
o
c.
><
LJ.J
Lrl
....
o
M
(fJ
Q)
~
.!!!
u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
00
" 0
'" "il 0
= > 01
" " V ~
'" ~"
.:: " = .2 0 0 0 01
" oj 0 " 0 0 ~
'"Oi " 0 V
~ :;: = '" ~ 01
0 ~ '" 00 ..D
" Z 01 .8
0
~ Co u
= .. 0
'"
~ ~ "0
v
~
~
v
u
u
<(
" 2
'" ~
= "il oj
" > "
'" " v v
~ ~<'l "0
" " = .2 0 S
~'"Oi on 0 '" oj 0 -
'" = '0 " 0 P'1
.- '" 5 0 " r::l
= 0 Z "@
o Co
'" .. .~
-=~ =
U v
~ ""
" i'l
=
~ .;!l
.to
.E '" "
0 5l
'" ~
0" '" oj
" u
~ r-,~ oj
G''o v v v :B
= = =
=~ "@ "@ "@ v
~~ ~ ~ 0
~ 0 " " " ~
0 0 0 ~
il~ Z Z Z ~
'"
'" R
=
" 11
u
oj
~
oj
..D
oj
1;1
r::l
.,,;
~
"0 v
."
= ~
= .~
~ "0
= ""
v 0 u
0 "R u ."
U "@ 0
"" ~
v %]
v "0 <(
= "@ v ~
v o oj
~ N E! ~,g u ~
= S
p., v 0 o v 0 ~
r::l P'1 "" ""~ r/l 0
Lrl
....
o
""
(fJ
Q)
::J
ro
>
><
o
~
(fJ
Q)
~
ro
.u
o
(fJ
(fJ
<(
.c
c.
Q)
(fJ
o
~
~
~
Q)
..c
c.
o
~
(fJ
.;:
..c
U
Sl '0 " '" on '"
0 0 0 0 0
" , 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
'=' , '" e- N ~ ~
'" " " e- e- 00
~ 0; ~ 0 ~ 0
Sl '" on '" e- N
'" 0 0 0 0 0
'2 0\ 0\ 0\ , 0\ 0\
0 " 0 0 , on on
.. 00 ~ '0 on N
-= '" '" '" '" ~
U
=
.S; .:<
~ ~ ~ '" ~
" ~ 0 0 0
= 0\ 0\ 0\
"ii .. , , ,
~ " ~ ~ , , , '"
'" " 0 on
= 0; '" 0;
.:< "
~ U
~
-=
'"
"
"
p:: ~
11 e- 00 e- o 00
I~ 0 0 0 0 0
0\ 0\ 0\ + 0\
IE ~
'" ~ " 0 ~
'0 0 0 0 0
" 00 '" '" 0 '"
~
0
~
"0 "0
=
IZ v ..=
0
2 I~ '"
0 ..= Oil
U v ~ ~
v "0 0
= Oil is = ~
v oj
~ N E! s ,s
=
p., v 0 0 v 0
~ P'1 '"' ~ ~ ~
~
Lrl
....
o
Lrl
.:L
(fJ
C2
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4
Combined Annual Emissions Reports (TonslYear)
File Name:
Project Name: Gateway Construction
Project Location: Bay Area Air District
On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version: Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006
Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007
Summary Report
CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES
2011 TOTALS (tonsfyear unmitigated)
C02
2,40895
2012 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,41889
2013 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,41952
2014 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,42010
2015 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,42057
2016 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,42088
2017 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,41188
2018 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated)
2,421.36
2019 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
2,421.55
2020 TOTALS (tonslyear unmitigated)
9.28
Construction Unmibgated Detail Report
CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Annual Tons Per Year, Unmitigated
Asphalt 0110112011-0110112020
C02
2,40895
174.04
000
147.15
0.37
26.51
1,51249
210.76
258.16
1,04357
1.74
2011
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 0110112011-0110112020
Building Off RoadOiesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 0110112011-0110112020
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 0110112011-0110112020
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
000
174
313.15
000
296.58
000
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011.01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2012
Asphalt 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off Road Diesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
BuildingOff Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
ArchitecturalCoabng
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
FugiHveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2013
Asphalt 01/01/2011.01/01/2020
PavingOff.Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Building Off Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Architectural Coabng
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
FugiHveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2014
Asphalt 01/01/2011-01101/2020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off Road Diesel
Paving On RoadOiesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01101/2011-01/01/2020
Building Off Road Diesel
16.57
407.54
000
390.97
000
16.57
2,41889
174.72
000
147.72
0.37
26.63
1,51894
211.57
259.16
1,04821
1.74
000
1.74
314.36
000
297.72
000
16.64
409.12
000
39248
000
16.64
2,41952
174.74
000
147.72
0.37
26.65
1,51954
211.57
259.18
1,04879
1.74
000
1.74
314.37
000
297.72
000
16.65
409.13
000
39248
000
16.65
2,42010
174.75
000
147.72
0.37
26.66
1,52009
211.57
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 0110112011-0110112020
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 0110112011-0110112020
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 0110112011-0110112020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2015
Asphalt 0110112011-01ID112020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 0110112011-0110112020
BuildingOff Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 0110112011-0110112020
ArchitecturalCoabng
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 0110112011-0110112020
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 0110112011-0110112020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2016
Asphalt 0110112011-0110112020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 0110112011-01/0112020
Building Off Road ~iesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating011D112011-0110112020
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 0110112011-0110112020
Fugitive Dust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 0110112011-0110112020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
259.20
1,04932
1.74
000
U4
314.38
000
297.72
000
16.66
409.14
000
39248
000
16.66
2,42057
174.76
000
147.72
0.37
26.67
1,52053
211.57
259.22
1,04974
175
000
U5
314.39
000
297.72
000
16.67
409.14
000
39248
000
16.67
2,42088
174.77
000
147.72
0.37
26.68
1,52083
211.57
259.24
1,05002
175
000
U5
314.39
000
297.72
000
16.67
409.15
000
39248
000
16.67
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
2017
Asphalt 01/01/2011.01/01/2020
PavingOff.Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Building Off Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Architectural Coabng
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 01/1)1/2011.01/01/2020
Fugitive Dust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2018
Asphalt 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off Road Diesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011_01/01/2020
BuildingOff Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
2019
Asphalt 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Building Off Road ~iesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolition 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
2,41188
174.10
000
147.15
0.37
26.58
1,51525
210.76
258.27
1,04623
1.74
000
174
313.19
000
296.58
000
16.61
407.59
000
390.97
000
16.61
2,421.36
174.78
000
147.72
0.37
26.69
1,521.28
211.57
259.28
1,05044
175
000
175
314.40
000
297.72
000
16.68
409.16
000
39248
000
16.68
2,421.55
17478
000
147.72
0.37
26.69
1,52146
211.57
259.30
1,05060
175
000
175
314.40
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Grading 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
000
297.72
000
16.68
409.16
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
000
39248
000
16.68
9.28
2020
Asphalt 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
0.67
Paving Off-Gas
Paving Off RoadDiesel
Paving On Road Diesel
Paving Worker Trips
Building 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
000
0.57
000
0.10
5.83
Building Off Road Diesel
Building Vendor Trips
BuildingWorkerTrips
Coating01/1J1/2011-01/01/2020
0.81
0.99
403
001
Architectural Coating
Coating Worker Trips
Demolitioll 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
000
0.01
1.20
000
1.14
000
0.06
1.57
FugitrveDust
Demo Off Road Diesel
Demo On Road Diesel
Demo Worker Trips
Fine Gradillg 01/01/2011-01/01/2020
Fine Grading Dust
Fine Grading Off Road Diesel
Fine Grading On Road Desel
Fine Grading Worker Trips
000
1.50
000
0.06
PhaseAssumDtions
Phase Demolition 1/1/2011 - 1/1/2020 - Type Your Description Here
Building Volume Total (cubic feet) 0
Building Volume Oai~ (cubic feet)
011 RoadTruckTravel (VMT) 0
Off-Road Equipment
1 Concrete~ndustrial Saws (10 hp) operating ata 0.73 load factor for 8 hours per day
1 RubberTiredDozers (357 hp) operating ataO.59 load factor for 8 hours per day
3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating ata 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day
Phase Fine Grading 1/1/2011- 1/1/2020- Default Fine Site Grading Description
Total Acres Disturbed 22.6
Maximum Dai~ Acreage Disturbed 5.65
Fugitrve Dust Level of Detail Default
20 Ibs per acre-day
011 RoadTruckTravel (VMT) 0
Off-Road Equipment
1 Graders (174 hp) operatingataO.61loadfactorfor8hours per day
1 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating ata 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day
2 Tractors/LoadersiBackhoes (108 hp) operating ata 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day
1 Water Trucks(189 hp)operatingataO.5load factor for 8 hours perday
Phase Paving 1/1/2011 - 1/1/2020 - Type Your Description Here
Acres to be Paved 5.65
Off-Road Equipment
4 Cement and Mortar Mixers (10 hp) operating ata 0.56 load factor for 6 hours per day
1 Pavers (100hp) operating ataO.62loadfactorfor7 hours per day
Page: 1
9/261200803:19:39 PM
2 Paving Equipment(104 hp)operating ata O.5310adfactorfor6hoursperday
1 Rollers (95hp) operating ataO.56 load factor for 7 hours per day
Phase Building Construction 1/1/2011 - 1/1/2020" Default Building Construction Description
Off-Road Equipment
1 Cranes (399 hp) operating ataOA31oadfactorfor6 hours per day
2 Forklifts (145 hp) operatingataO.3 load factor for 6hours perd ay
1 Generator Sets (49hp) operatingata 0.7410adfactorfor8hours per day
1 Tractors/LoadersiBackhoes (108 hp) operating ata 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day
3 Welders (45 hp) operating ata OA5 load factor for 8 hours per day
Phase Architectural Coating 1/1/2011 - 1/1/2020" Default Architectural Coating Descripbon
Rule Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250
Rule Residenbal Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250
Rule Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250
Rule Nonresidential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ELECTRICITY GENERATION
Project Name:
Analysis Year:
Analysis Scenario:
Gateway
2020
Buildout
ELECTRICITY DEMAND
La nd Use
Residential Units
Food Store (square feet):
Restaurant (square feet):
Hospital (square feet):
Retail (square feet):
College/University (square feet):
High School (square feet):
Elementary School (square feet):
Office (square feet):
Hotel/Motel (square feet):
Warehouse (square feet):
Miscellaneous (square feet):
Total Megawatt Hours (MWh) per Year:
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Emissions
Carbon Dioxide
Methane
Nitrous Oxide
Emission
Factors
(lbs/MWh)
878.71
0.007
0.004
Total Emissions:
Useage
Rate
(KWh/
Units unit/year)
5626.5
53.3
47.45
21.7
13.55
11. 55
10.5
5.9
1230370 12.95
9.95
4.35
10.5
Total Electricity Demand:
15,933.3
Emissions
(metric tons)
6,350.64
0.048
0.027
6,350.71
CO2
Equivalency
Factors
1
23
296
Electricity
Demand
(KWh/
year)
15,933,291.5
15,933,291.5
CO2
Equivalent
Emissions
(tons per year)
6,350.64
1.11
7.92
6,359.67
Source of usage rates: South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA
Air Quality Handbook, April 1993.
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: Califomia Climate Action Registry General Reporting
Protocol, April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Buildout.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION
Project Name:
Analysis Year:
Analysis Scenario:
Gateway
2020
Buildout
NATURAL GAS DEMAND
La nd Use
Single Residential Units:
Multi-Family Residential Units:
Industrial (parcels):
Hotel/Motel (square feet):
Retail/Shopping (square feet):
Office (square feet):
Heating Value of Natural Gas (Btu/cubic foot):
Monthly BTU:
Monthly Million Btu (MMBtu):
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Emissions
Carbon Dioxide
Metha ne
Nitrous Oxide
Emission
Factors
(kg/MMBtu)
53.06
0.00590
0.00010
Total Emissions:
Consumption
Rate
(cubic feet/
Units unit/month)
6,665.0
4,011.5
241,611.0
4.8
2.9
1230370 2.0
Total Natural Gas Demand:
1,020.0
2,509,954,800.0
2,510.0
Emissions
(metric tons/year)
1,598.14
0.178
0.003
1,598.32
CO2
Equivalency
Factors
1
23
296
Natural Gas
Demand
(cubic feet/
month)
2,460,740.0
2,460,740.0
CO2
Equivalent
Emissions
(tons per year)
1,598.14
4.09
0.89
1,603.12
Source of natural gas consumption rates: South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality
Handbook, April 1993.
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol,
April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Buildout.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MOTOR VEHICLES
Project Name: Gateway
Analysis Year: 2020
Analysis Scenario: Buildout
Vehicle Miles Per Day: 88,427.33
Days of Operation Per Year: 365
Vehicle Fleet Mix
Assumed
Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel mpg
Light Auto 60.50% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 27.5
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs 12.60% 0.00% 99.10% 0.90% 21.4
Light Truck 3,751-5,750 21.50% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 21.4
Medium Truck 5,751-8,500 1.40% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 17.6
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000 0.20% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 14.3
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000 1.00% 0.00% 71.40% 28.60% 10.5
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 0.20% 0.00% 66.70% 33.30% 8.0
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0.00% 0.00% 22.20% 77 . 80% 5.7
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 5.7
Urban Bus 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 5.7
Motorcycle 3.00% 39.30% 60.70% 0.00% 27.5
School Bus 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.3
Motor Home 0.40% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 8.0
Mobile Source Emision Factors
Carbon Dioxide Methane Nitrous Oxide
(kgjgallon) (gjmile) (gjmile)
Vehicle Type Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel
Light Auto 8.81 10.15 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.02
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs 8.81 10.15 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.03
Light Truck 3,751-5,750 8.81 10.15 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.03
Medium Truck 5,751-8,500 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Urban Bus 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Motorcycle 8.81 10.15 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00
School Bus 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Motor Home 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons per year)
Carbon Dioxide
Gasoline Diesel
6,255.73
1,659.15
2,856.80
226.19
39.77
193.36
47.42
Vehicle Type
Light Auto
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs
Light Truck 3,751-5,750
Medium Truck 5,751-8,500
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs
Urban Bus
Motorcycle
School Bus
Motor Home
Total Emissions by Fuel Type:
Total Emissions by Pollutant:
CO2 Equivalency Factors
CO2 Equivalent Emissions:
Total Emissions (C02e):
17.36
Methane
Gasoline Diesel
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Nitrous Oxide
Gasoline Diesel
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
89.23
27.27
0.00
0.00
57.47 0.00 0.00
310.20 0.00 0.00
142.18 0.00 0.00
11,730.79 191.34 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00
11922.13 0.07 0.08
1.00 23.00 296.00
11922.13 1.54 22.24
11,945.92
Source of vehicle miles per day and vehicle fleet mix: URBElnS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 model results for this analysis.
Sources of assumed rnpg: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Surmnary of Fuel Economy Performance (for passenger vehicles and
light b-ucks) (web site accessed July 11, 2007); U.s. Department of Energy Truck Fuel Economy by Size Class (web site ,lCcessed July 11,
2007).
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: California Climate Action Registry Genefdl Repofting Protocol, April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Buildout.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION
Project Name:
Analysis Year:
Analysis Scenario:
Gateway
2010
Existing
NATURAL GAS DEMAND
La nd Use
Single Residential Units:
Multi-Family Residential Units:
Industrial (parcels):
Hotel/Motel (square feet):
Retail/Shopping (square feet):
Office (square feet):
Heating Value of Natural Gas (Btu/cubic foot):
Monthly BTU:
Monthly Million Btu (MMBtu):
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Emissions
Carbon Dioxide
Metha ne
Nitrous Oxide
Emission
Factors
(kg/MMBtu)
53.06
0.00590
0.00010
Total Emissions:
Consumption
Rate
(cubic feet/
Units unit/month)
6,665.0
4,011.5
241,611.0
4.8
2.9
284000 2.0
Total Natural Gas Demand:
1,020.0
579,360,000.0
579.4
Emissions
(metric tons/year)
368.89
0.041
0.001
368.93
CO2
Equivalency
Factors
1
23
296
Natural Gas
Demand
(cubic feet/
month)
568,000.0
568,000.0
CO2
Equivalent
Emissions
(tons per year)
368.89
0.94
0.21
370.04
Source of natural gas consumption rates: South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality
Handbook, April 1993.
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol,
April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Existing.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MOTOR VEHICLES
Project Name: Gateway
Analysis Year: 2010
Analysis Scenario: Existing
Vehicle Miles Per Day: 23,590.64
Days of Operation Per Year: 365
Vehicle Fleet Mix
Assumed
Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel mpg
Light Auto 60.50% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 27.5
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs 12.60% 0.00% 99.10% 0.90% 21.4
Light Truck 3,751-5,750 21.50% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 21.4
Medium Truck 5,751-8,500 1.40% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 17.6
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000 0.20% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 14.3
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000 1.00% 0.00% 71.40% 28.60% 10.5
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 0.20% 0.00% 66.70% 33.30% 8.0
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0.00% 0.00% 22.20% 77 . 80% 5.7
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 5.7
Urban Bus 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 5.7
Motorcycle 3.00% 39.30% 60.70% 0.00% 27.5
School Bus 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.3
Motor Home 0.40% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 8.0
Mobile Source Emision Factors
Carbon Dioxide Methane Nitrous Oxide
(kgjgallon) (gjmile) (gjmile)
Vehicle Type Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel
Light Auto 8.81 10.15 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.02
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs 8.81 10.15 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.03
Light Truck 3J51-5,750 8.81 10.15 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.03
Medium Truck 5,751-8,500 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Urban Bus 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Motorcycle 8.81 10.15 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00
School Bus 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Motor Home 8.81 10.15 0.12 0.06 0.20 0.05
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons per year)
Carbon Dioxide
Gasoline Diesel
1,668.90
442.63
762.14
60.34
10.61
51.58
12.65
Vehicle Type
Light Auto
Light Truck <3,750 Ibs
Light Truck 3J51-5J50
Medium Truck 5J51-8,500
Light Heavy 8,501-10,000
Light Heavy 10,001-14,000
Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000
Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000
Line Haul >60,000 Ibs
Urban Bus
Motorcycle
School Bus
Motor Home
Total Emissions by Fuel Type:
Total Emissions by Pollutant:
CO2 Equivalency Factors
CO2 Equivalent Emissions:
Total Emissions (C02e):
4.63
Methane
Gasoline Diesel
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Nitrous Oxide
Gasoline Diesel
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.81
7.28
0.00
0.00
15.33 0.00 0.00
82.76 0.00 0.00
37.93 0.00 0.00
3,129.54 51.05 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00
3180.59 0.02 0.02
1.00 23.00 296.00
3180.59 0.41 5.93
3,186.93
Source of vehicle miles per day and vehicle fleet mix: URBElnS 2007 results for this analysis.
Sources of assumed rnpg: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Surmnary of Fuel Economy Performance (for passenger vehicles and
light b-ucks) (web site accessed July 11, 2007); U.s. Department of Energy Truck Fuel Economy by Size Class (web site ,lCcessed July 11,
2007).
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: California Climate Action Registry Genefdl Repofting Protocol, April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Existing.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ELECTRICITY GENERATION
Project Name:
Analysis Year:
Analysis Scenario:
Gateway
2010
Existing
ELECTRICITY DEMAND
La nd Use
Residential Units
Food Store (square feet):
Restaurant (square feet):
Hospital (square feet):
Retail (square feet):
College/University (square feet):
High School (square feet):
Elementary School (square feet):
Office (square feet):
Hotel/Motel (square feet):
Warehouse (square feet):
Miscellaneous (square feet):
Total Megawatt Hours (MWh) per Year:
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Emissions
Carbon Dioxide
Methane
Nitrous Oxide
Emission
Factors
(lbs/MWh)
878.71
0.007
0.004
Total Emissions:
Useage
Rate
(KWh/
Units unit/year)
5626.5
53.3
47.45
21.7
13.55
11. 55
10.5
5.9
284000 12.95
9.95
4.35
10.5
Total Electricity Demand:
3,677.8
Emissions
(metric tons)
1,465.89
0.011
0.006
1,465.90
CO2
Equivalency
Factors
1
23
296
Electricity
Demand
(KWh/
year)
3,677,800.0
3,677,800.0
CO2
Equivalent
Emissions
(tons per year)
1,465.89
0.26
1.83
1,467.97
Source of usage rates: South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA
Air Quality Handbook, April 1993.
Source of greenhouse gas emission factors: Califomia Climate Action Registry General Reporting
Protocol, April 2008.
GHG - Gateway Existing.xls
Christopher A. Joseph Associates
APPENDIX D
TREE REPORT
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 200S
TREE SURVEY REPORT
FOR THE
GA TEW A Y PRECISE PLAN PHASE I
Gateway Business Park,
South San Francisco, California
Prepared by:
Christopher A. Joseph & Associates
610 16th Street, Suite 51-1
Oakland, CA 9-1612
Contact: Emma Jack Ph.D.
Phone: 510--152-5200
September 2008
iIi&2] CHRISTOPHER A. JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES
Environmental Planning and Research
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
TREE SURVEY REPORT
for the
GATEWAY PRECISE PLAN PHASE I
Christopher A. Joseph and Associates (CAJA), conducted a tree survey for the 8.91-acre Gateway Business Park
Precise Plan Phase I project site which is located in South San Francisco, San ]'dateo County, Califomia. The site is
located along the westem shoreline of Central San Francisco Bay, a mile north of the San Francisco Intemational
Airport and ten minutes south of downtown San Francisco. The Precise Plan Phase I project site area is contained
within the larger Gateway Business Park that is fully developed, and includes surface parking lots, roads, stmctures
and landscaped areas.
Background and l\Iethods
On September 5, 2008, CAJA inventoried all the trees present within the Phase I project site to identifY which trees
that may be subject to the City's Protected Tree Ordinance (l\Iunicipal Code Chapter 13.30). 11us ordinance
describes a protected tree as: (1) any tree with a circUluference of forty-eight inches or nlOre when lueasured fifty-
four inches above natural grade, or (2) a tree or stand of trees designated by the director as unique and of
importance to the public due to its unusuallustorical sigluI/cance, or (3) a stand of trees in wluch the director has
ddenllined each tree is dependent upon the others for survival.
Trees with nudtiple trunks growing frOlU one root systenl were considered as single trunks and the largest tnlllk was
measured and recorded, as directed by the Department of Parks and Recreation1 In additional the circumference of
the additional tmnks was recorded and is presented in the Tree l\Iatrix table in parentheses: no cumulative
circumference was calculated. Inventoried trees that met the protected tree criteria were tagged with biodegradable
tlagging tape, inscribed with their corresponding Tree l\Iatrix number, and photographed (Appendix A). 11lOse
trees that were inaccessible during the tree survey were inventoried by visual inspection only and were estiluated to
have a circumference below ~8 inches (<~8) or above ~8 inches (>~8), and are recorded in Table 1. Additionally,
several trees located adjacent to building 900 were completely inaccessible during the tree survey and visual
estimations of their tnmk circumference were not possible. These trees are located witlun the area labeled "no
access" (Figure I). However, an aerial map' was reviewed in order to estimate the number of trees that were totally
obscured from view. From the aerial map, it is ddemuned that there are an additional 13 to I~ trees on the project
Personal communication, Alarie Pateo Department o/Parks and Recreation, September 8, 2008.
2
Google maps http://l11aps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=ll'/ Accessed September 9,2008.
Gatelfay Business Park, Precise Plan - Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 1
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
site that could potentially be considered as protected under the City's Protected Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code
Chapter 13.30), these trees are not recorded within Table I.
All trees present on the site were mapped on a tield map. The tree map presented in this report (Figure 1) utilized
site plans provided by Chamberlin Associates in their existing site plan document for the Gateway Business Park as
a base lllap"
Results
The following are general tield observations made during the visit to the project site. Vegetation typical of a
suburbanized setting is present tluoughout the project site, including ornmllental-exotic trees and sluubs, as well as
non-native perellllial and mUlual plants and lawn areas" TIle lllajority of the existing plant lllaterial is in good to fair
health and aesthetic condition as detenllined by visual inspection.
Based upon the cunent site plans, all the trees present within the boundaries of the project site will be removed. Of
the 105 trees sUlveyed, 19 are considered to be protected trees and would require a tree removal permit before the
implementation of the proposed project (Table 1). In addition, there are 13 to 1-l trees located within the
inaccessible area adjacent to building 900 that will require surveying to determine if they are protected before
implementation of the proposed project to avoid any contlicts with the City's Protected Tree Ordinance (l\lunicipal
Code Chapter 13.30).
Ta hie 1
Tree Survey Results
Tree l\Iatrix Scientific Name Circumference Tree Removal
Common Name Permit required
Number (Genus species) [in Inches] fY/Nj
1 P1TllS ca//enyma Onlamental pear 28 N
2 Pl"l"I/s callen"ana Onlamental pear 21 N
3 P1TIlS callen'(/}1(f Onlamental pear 20 N
-l Prrlls callen'ana Ornamental pear 16 N
5 P1TllS ca//enyma Onlamental pear 21 N
6 Pl"l"I/s callen"ana Onlamental pear 22.5 N
7 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine -l7 N
8 Pin/ls vonderosa Ponderosa pine 35 N
9 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 39 N
10 Pin/ls vonderosa Ponderosa pine 6-l Y
11 Af1'OpOrl/m/aetllln l\!vopofUm 15 N
12 Af1'ovol"l/m/aetIll11 t.lvoPOnl111 11 N
13 .Al1'opOrIll11/aet/ll11 1IvopOnl111 9 N
1-l Schin/ls tel"ebinthifo/ilIS Brazilian pepper 7(7,6A,6) N
15 Schinlls tel"Cbinthifo/ilIS Brazilian pepper 3( -l,6,9, 7,25) N
16 Schinl/s tel"ebinthifo/ilIS Brazilian pepper 12(7,19.9) N
17 Schinlls terebinthifolills Brazilian pepper 10, (12) N
18 Schin/ls tel"ebinthifo/ilIS Brazilian pepper 10(2.15,19) N
19 Af1'OpOrI/l11/aetllln l\!vopofUm 31 N
Gatelfay Business Park, Precise P/an- Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 2
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
Ta ble I (Continued)
Tree Survey Results
Tree l\latrix Scientific Name Circumference Tree Removal
Common Name Permit required
Number (Genus species) [in Inches] fY/Nl
20 Afl'ovOrllmlaetllm 1Ivonomm 33 N
21 Pinus fJonderosa Ponderosa pine 475 N
00 Pin liS vonderosa Ponderosa nine 37(10,10) N
23 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 26 N
24 Pinus vonderosa Ponderosa nine 2622 N
25 Pinus fJonderosa Ponderosa pine 48 Y
26a i.HrovorllJ11 laetmn 1.fvononU11 23 N
26b All'OpOrllJ11 laetum Myoponul1 21 N
26c Afl'ovOrllmlaetllm 1Ivonomm 33 N
27 AlYofJorl/mlaetntn tJvoporum 10(15.7.3) N
28 AfrovorllJ11 laetmn 1.fvononU11 28 N
29 All'OpOrllJ11 laetum Myoponul1 38 N
30 Afl'ovOrllmlaetllm 1Ivonomm 20 N
31 AlYofJorl/mlaetntn tJvoponun 29 N
32 Pl'rlls callenyma Ornam ental near 20 N
33 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 35 N
34 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 42 N
35 P1TllS callen'ana Ornamental pear 54 Y
36 Pl'rlls callenyma Ornam ental near 34(21) N
37 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 00 N
38 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 16 N
39 P1TllS callen'ana Ornamental pear 28 N
40 Pl'rlls callenyma Ornam ental near 19 N
41 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 25 N
42 Pinus vonderosa Ponderosa nine 175 N
43 Pinus fJonderosa Ponderosa pine 39 N
44 Schin/Is tel'ebinthifoli/IS Brazilian nenner 29 N
45 Schin/ls tei'ebinthifoli/IS Brazilian pepper 23(10.7.6) N
46 Schinlls terebinthifo/i/ls Brazilian nenner 10(12,16) N
47 5'chinlls terebinthifo/i/ls Brazilian pepper 5(5.4.4) N
48 Schil1/IS tel'ebinthifoli/IS Brazilian nenner 17(10) N
49 Schin/ls tei'ebinthifoli/IS Brazilian pepper 16(18.10.7) N
50 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 49 Y
51 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 15 N
52 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 17 N
53 Pl'rllS callen'ana Ornamental pear 26 N
54 P1TlIS callenyma Onlamental Dear 20 N
55 Prrlls callelTana Onlamental pear 25 N
56 pozmlus niera 'lta/ica' Lombardy nonlar 17 N
57 POIIII/IIS niera 'Italica' Lombardy poplar 57 Y
58 POplI/IIS nigra 'Italica' Lombardy poplar 55 Y
59 Pov/ll/ls ni'<{ra 'Ita/ica' Lombardy poplar 60 Y
60 Poplllus ni'<{ra 'lta/ica' Lombardy poplar 55 Y
61 POfJllltlS ni'<{lll 'Italica' Lombardy poplar 65 Y
Gatelfay Business Park. Precise Plal1- Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 3
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
Ta hie I (Continued)
Tree Survey Results
Tree l\latrix Scientific Name Circumference Tree Removal
Common Name Permit required
Number (Genus species) [in Inches] fY/Nl
62 Pinus vonderosa Ponderosa nine 55 Y
63 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 38 N
64 Pin liS vonderosa Ponderosa nine 50 Y
65 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 41 N
66 Pinus vonderosa Ponderosa nine 39(18) N
67 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 36 N
68 Zelko1'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova 64 Y
69 Unknmvn pinus sp. Pine species 47 N
70 Pinus vonderosa Ponderosa nine 39(32,32) N
71 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 47 N
T2 Pin liS vonderosa Ponderosa nine 45 N
73 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 42 N
G74 Acacia sv. Acacia ornamental snecies <48* N
G75 Acacia sp. Acacia ornamental species <48* N
G76 Acacia sv. Acacia ornamental snecies <48* N
G77 Acacia S/J. Acacia ornamental species <48* N
G78 Acacia sv. Acacia ornamental snecies <48* N
79 Acacia sp. Acacia ornamental species 27 N
80 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 23 N
81 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 30 N
82 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 65 Y
83 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 22 N
84 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 34 N
85 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 35 N
86 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 27 N
87 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 22 N
88 Pl'rlls callen'ana Ornam ental near 31 N
89 P1TllS callenyma Ornamental pear 37 N
90 UnkI10\vn vi11/ls SD. Pine s )ecies 34 N
91 Unknmvn pinus sp. Pine species 22 N
92 UnkI10\Vn vinlls SD. Pine snecies 30 N
Gl Zelko1'G serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G2 Zelkova serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G3 Zelk01'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G4 Zelko1'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G5 Zelk01'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G6 Zelkowl serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G7 Zelkm'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G8 Zelko1'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G9 Zelkm'a serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
G10 Zelkowl serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
Gll Zelko1'o serrata Saw leaf Zelkova >48* Y
Gatelfay Business Park, Precise Plan - Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page ~
Cll1istopherA, Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
Ta ble 1 (Continued)
Tree Survey Results
Tree l\latrix Scientific Name Circumference Tree Removal
Common Name Permit required
Number (Genus species) [in Inches] fY/Nl
G Denotes those trees thatll'ere inaccessible during the sll1Tey and their circumference was estimated
() hidicates the circumference of minor trunks of trees ll'ith l1J/1ltiple h'u1Jks
<../"8* T"isual estimation ofh'ees ll'ere determined to be belml' -18 inches
>-18* T"isual estimation of trees were determined to be abol'e -IS inches
Although the surveyed trees are all ornamental-exotic species and have been planted as part of the original
landscape development. they are ddined as protected because they all exceed -l8 inches in circumference at 5-l
inches above natural grade, No trees on the site were detenllined to have unique inlportance due to unusual
location. appearance or historical significance,
The Project Applicant shall replace all 19 protected trees that will be removed for the redevelopment. as well as any
additional protected trees that may be on-ste. 111e replacement of trees will be conducted in accordance to the
City's Protected Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 13.30.080), which states that any protected trees which
will be removed shall be replaced as follows:
(1) Replacement shall be three twenty-four-inch box size or two thirty-six-inch box minimum size landscape
trees for each tree removed as determined below. However, the director maintains the right to dictate size
and species of trees in new developlllents.
(2) Any protected tree removed without a valid penllit shall be replaced by two thirty-six-inch box minimum
size landscape trees for each tree so renlOved as determined below.
(3) Replacement of a protected tree can be waived by the director if a suHicient number of trees exist on the
property to meet all other requirements of the tree preservation ordinance.
(-l) If replacement trees, as designated in subsection (b)(1) or (2) of this section, as applicabk cannot be
planted on the property, payment of twice the replacement value of the tree as detenllined by the
International Society of Arboriculture Standards shall be made to the city. Such payments shall be
deposited in the tree planting fillld to be drawn upon for public tree purchase and planting (Ord. 1271 ~ 1
(part), 2000: Ord. 1 060 ~ 1 (part), 1989).
The following outlines the procedures for obtaining a tree removal permit pursuant to the City's Protected Tree
Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 13.30.060).
(a) Owners, or their authorized representative, of protected trees shall obtain a permit to remove or pnllle a
protected tree. 111e application shall be on a form fiIrlrished by the department and shall state, among
other tlrings, the number and location of the tree(s) to be removed or pmned by type and the reason for
Gatelfay Business Park, Precise Plal1- Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 5
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
removal or Imming of each. The application shall also include a photograph with correct botanical
identification of the subject tree(s). When removal or pruning of a protected tree is proposed as part of or
in c01\iunction with new development the application shall also include: (l) a site plan showing the
location of buildings, structures and proposed site disturbances: (2) the location of all protected trees on
the site: and (3) the protected trees on the site that would be removed or pruned. An authorized
representative of the department shall make an inspection of any protected tree or site subject to this
section and shall file a written report and his reconlluendations to the director.
(b) In reviewing applications for removal or pnllling of protected trees, the director shall give priority to those
based on hazard or danger of disease. 111e director may refer any application to another department,
conlnuttee, board or cOlunussion of the city for a report and reconlluendation. and luay require the
applicant to provide an arboris!'s report. In reviewing each application, the director shall determine:
(1) The condition of the protected tree(s) with respect to disease: danger or falling: prm:imity to existing
or proposed stnlctures. yards. driveways and other trees: and interference with public utility services:
(2) The necessity to remove the protected tree in order to construct any proposed improvements and
allow economic eqjoyment of the property:
(3) The topography of the land and the dfect of the removal of the protected tree on eroslOn: soil
retention: and diversion or increased flow of surface waters:
(-l) The number of protected trees and trees in the neighborhood on unimproved property and the effect
the removal would have on the established standard of the area and property value. "'Neighborhood"
means the area within a three-hundred-foot radius ofthe property containing the tree in question:
(5) The number oftrees the particular parcel can adequately support according to good arboriculture
(6) The effect removal of the protected tree would have on wind protection, noise and privacy: and
(7) The econonuc consequences and obligations of requiring a protected tree to reluain or reluain
unpnllled (Ord. 1271 S 1 (part), 2000: Ord. 1060 S 1 (part), 1989).
Gatel1'ay Business Park, Precise Plal1- Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 6
Cll1istopherA. Joseph &- Associates
September 2008
NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER: Opinions given in this report are those of Christopher A Joseph & Associates and are derived
from current professional standards based on visual observations at the time the field surveys \vere conducted. The trees
discussed herein were generally reviewed for physical and biological function and aesthetic conditions. This examination was
conducted in accordance "with presently' accepted industry procedures, "which are ground plane macro-visual observation only.
This visual record does not include aerial or subterranean inspections, microbiological or soil-root excavation'), upper crown
examinations or internal tree investigation (i.e. core sampling), and therefore may not reveal existing hidden conditions or
hazards. Records are only represented as accurate as of the dates of the surveys due to variable environmental factors,
including but not limited to the reasonably foreseeable deterioration and/or grmvth of existing plant material.
Gatel1"ay Business Park, Precise Plal1- Phase I
Tree Reporr
Page 7
, .
Ii' .t
\'\"
...
:;:
!:
o
:;:;
r:l
o
..J
Vl
c
.Q Q)
ro :'!::
gUl
...J~
J :r
I
"
i ~ '\~'"
'i'
..i."I':\, _
.. "," ...~I,
U_..J ..::rt;"'..,~, -~,11;"\,...
-r r.' .,h~
J.. ~ qy. . ',<
11 ~~ -,v'
J-I -..' 1 _ I..,;. ...._ "
I _~....._ Q.~/ (
., -~-~ -<>:, ., U.>
',~~. V
"'~<~
o
'"
6g ~
o
~
~
o
-0
C
"
Q
CO
Q
Q)
4:
c
o
a::
Q)
~
.v
Q)
~
C-
Q)
t;
<(
(V)
OJ
\.
~
,\ t-I"".
-
H
-..- ...::
~ ,
... or
~
,
~ 0..
Q) III
~2:
:J C
r:JlO
LL .
-
III
()
o
-'
>-
Q)
2:
:J
CI)
Q)
~
I-
Vl
W
~
U{j
O~
VlQ)
Vl<J)
<t~
06L1
Ie
o...ro
WOJ
Vlc
02
""'c
.ro
<to...
0::_
Wj3
Ie
1LQ)
OE
I- c
VlO
- ~
0::::: ":;
Ie
Uw
l~
(fJ
,
Appendix A-Photos ~r Protected Trees
September, 2008
Tree Jfatrix J.Vumber 10 PiJ1l1,\' Pondermm
Tree Jfatrix .Vumber 35 PYJ'llS callei)'(lJ1(I
Tree Jfatrix J.VuJ11ber 25 Pinus pOl1derosa
Tree Jlatrix J.Vumber 50 Pyrus Callel)'Una
Gatell'ay Business Park, Precise Plan
Appendix A.-Precise Plan Phase I
Page 1
Appendix A-Photos ~rProtected Trees
September, 2008
Tree Jfatrix J.Vumber 57 Populu.\' nigra 'ftaUca'
Tree Matrix Number (L-R): 59, 60, 61)
Populus nigra 'l/aUea'
Tree Jfatrix J.VuJ11ber 58 Populu.\' nigra 'I/aliea'
''\' . .,,,,~,,.-tr1-'":j:""'\'<:" '"
. ,..-.'~\d"';"'i:~'.'" ; ,"J',""'"
.;- .; '~".fj'~~ t i' ,/' .~.~"? "
_,~ ._'~I-:': i "!i'1fi ~ .. , r:' ..,!:. 'r-:
, ...~ ".t"i.~ _l~' I' ~ 'fir. ".f .f'
...., ~:'t i.)...... "t. t\ ,'\ ,.... ~... "'~"'.~ .
....~'O. !'~ :';~..l,-Jo".~'" ":.,,: ,#r. \: _,. j ~.I./f
,_ .", \ ':~'\li \ ~ ','; . .",. . F.'-;
. ....f~~...\ .: \ ',.,.. . ~."'~"
, '.~--.i<"" . . \, '1,' !"..:" ~ .:
~:- ~~ '\~J~" - 4 wt ~ flfiT ' J
;:\~:" .~. 1,' \..c'" /- ../ .":.:~~
, ". ~ .'~! L :1". \t.~ , j.J~4 -.,"fi ' ,t'
. ~,,~;>. Zl...", ..' "t .....f'. ~
\... .., , ^ 't'v..~.IltJ ~~'~ 1" ."'... /' a'.~
. .'~~;~~~~~~'1\"~ ';)t~ ".~1:i
,"" ., ;A,..' ." 101 ,_.,l'jI
~"-.~~~ ~_- "1' _".
,. ~'~1 "'v.,,}~~a: , ~i
4~.~ VAl'.' .-.' -
. ~6"<
. ~ /If 4lY ~. ..' ,,~..,,~~~,.~~,
. '.4~ *, (;. "'l'~~'> .... "*:
4~;f: '" "P';J~~:,'1
. "'\. '... . _-'~1:" "'..~ ~ ..;.
.............. ~,.,.. -.' "\.
'." .
~=---'~
~
Tree JJatr;x J.Vumber 62, 6../ Pinus ponderosa
Gatel1'ay Business Park, Precise Plan
Appendix A-Precise Plan Phase I
Page 2
Appendix A-Photos ~rProtected Trees
September, 2008
Tree Jfatrix J.Vumber 68 Zelkol'a .\'errata
Tree Jfatrix .Vumber 92 Zelkol'a serrafa
Tree Jfatrix J.VuJ11ber Gl Zelkol'a serrata
;'I'>'!) :'rl",~ '{<',..:"~ J. p~.. ,.. .."....:
':1~.t;f~ ~ ~~L . '.'" ~t:l...r l1!;"~'~.' 1;:':'.
~f ~~Jt .f~.i.l,' t~ j,~ 'i~,~;;d.?>
.."'a.~'~ ..~, -...:., .. .,. ~\ \'.;""'~"'A!.J ~
1;.;~Jf. ~f''J...;~~.~~~l':~ \iii,. ~~.:~.'J.?A~'/ ~
"~-"'.;I ~" . .R. :., i.,.,&1!P.~ ~~
t...,.}.~.~ l"'.! r~' f.Jl::.-.~ ~""~;j'..~.'<.I'f' "'..-"...".~
~..~~ ~..", ~~ ~ - , j}trf ,__~~-...~~lj'~,
~~\nJ.. t) ~ ~, '. . ~ ~Yf;i' i.~~>:::J ~~~):
~,,'~~'~"~:J ~~, ~tJ~'~1' r:'~:J.?' ......ri~_.,~
>\, ....:..:.l..,B:.,,:~at~ 'j '..; ~ ~'~~~J.'~~
,., '~. :"Ii- . '~f"'.. ,If ..c~<;'... ~"-.'
" t' i:t~~;!""t:: ,J; ~ ~1'~~ . - ,;;~I
~., " 41 f1~~rr.~ {~~e;-~..'J<?:g
, <Y:"" ~.~..rt!"'._" ~~..;t,;~n .~
'~~ ~'C't"'~ . .~f.. .... .,,-
.. i'~ t.. '!"'l ,. It.-:- ~ ;.3,~':" d".i"f
. '" . ... ..,.... ,f : , ."'{"l ,." c-"."'_'''~
~l~' j~~l,..~ i'~_< ~.....Yj}.:. .",.t:'~i:.;:~1~
.~'." '\.~.. /' J . '''is t!;Ii~~';W~
,rwo:,;'~~ f.lf :t. . "( .".:.til}
~?~~.'.'~. ",~~,. .<. '.;.l~'r.';?;
~~'\i:,... ,-~'., ~... '._'1!
. :'~'-~",... ... .~' ~
..... ,. . << L .. '. 1
'... .".,- ".'" ~ .." -- -~ -'. .
~},<-,-'''\..:::- ,i...._ ,..:1 .
. r. ,,> ) -- -~ ,~.
...c.:; .#-. .J ':. l ..~ '. ". 'J.'
.0 .. . ,,_ . I ~ ~ "' I .~
.... ,," J i'~
Tree JJatr;x J.Vumber G3 Zelkol'a serrata
Gatelfay Business Park, Precise Plan
Appendix A-Precise Plan Phase I
Page 3
Appendix A-Photos ~rProtected Trees
September, 2008
~..~'''~ ". ..'....;;~~~..'r0~:7:~ii1;~~;~i:;:~~~i
"'.~.>,... ".J.,", .".':'-:F.",~-- '~1ft"i""'~
,~.....' : "': ..: %~'~~ii;- \. . ':;':;:>~7.....~,,~,.~,:
.'>J. I., 04'..". --~, ' '.. ~ .... ..,. t..,~,.'l,
~::- &<.. '.. ..,"('c. ;i/~(: :\~'-/cf';' r'}~f'i;
o~. ... '~.. I,' '\..''''''''<'''..',
." ~. ...; .c.. .....-i"~i'....:,~ r ~ ;'.d,::-;} .
I-.'):.~,.. , ~~}. '... -:.,.<:.....1,~+ -~ Tf ..~, LJ ~', ~ .... <~..
..'.. "'''-''''.. .....h- ".".., . "'..'"~,"",,,,
"';;'::"'?~f';-\":l'-....,>;.__~~_ ~~:~~~?~ _~ ..~..',.;
lI.. :.. ........ .}g../...~:t~'"";... ~..~. ..' :'.:_ ..'.;~.<.' "" '" ......~..
,',. ~'! i.t. .r.'.~' '41' "-.' .......~.' .":'J'. .
~ .t>~..~ ... , ',~:;:n.. .1' < "., . .:.~_. 'J.:'
:iIi~., _ ~ '~I")~' ..,.'~. .,,:'.~.._..
t..- .p.,.~.. \1"~.. ..,.~ 1~_~_~,.~;.~~'~i.X
~..~.'"..."'t~/. . :." '. '~#\!: .. '. .. :~~;,;,.
i;.,';:.}. ~'''''':..''''''' '1. - ,..::g'!.<-'i.
-",')r;i~:$.' .;.....,. ".~ .", " _~,.. ~
..~'-. ~ . .. /oi .",:s. I I.. .. ...,.,~r ~'_~_"
'."f,. .,~ t ,,,,, .~, l.. },~.. '.''''\'.C
;"':{.' l~~~,.~. ~h::;I.. '" j .., {~ ,j:l'J:5;.. . .p.c.o..
C~''''''', -/~". '.. I "
~"'..':~t~.,< ,"1',~
~"" .' . -~,.. '. ,
'i,' < i, "~';;~:':[,'iO'''-- - \l' '
~ ?t;.~ f I ~ I~ ~ ~
~ ~~:1\1 ~
~.
Tree Jfatrix J.Vumber G-I Zelkol'a serrata
Tree Jfatrix .Vumber G6 Zelkol'a ...,'errata
Tree Jfatrix J.VuJ11ber G5 ZelkOl'll serrata
Tree Jlatrix J.Vumber G7 Zelkol'Q ...,'errata
Gatel1'ay Business Park, Precise Plan
Appendix A.-Precise Plan Phase I
Page ~
Appendix A-Photos of Protected Trees
September, 2008
Tree JJatr;x ),Vumbers
(L-R) G8, G9, GlO, G12 ZeJkora sen'ota
Gatel1'ay Business Park, Precise Plan
Appendix A-Precise Plan Phase I
Page 5
APPENDIX E
HISTORIC REPORT
HISTORIC PROPERTY A:\I) ARCHAEOLOGICAL I:\VE:\TORY REPORT
FOR THE SOUTH SA:\ FRA:\CISCO GATEWA Y BUSI:\ESS PARK PRO.JECT,
SOUTH SA:\ FRA:\CISCO, SA:\ MATEO COU:\TY, CALlFOR:\IA
by
Matthew R. Clark. RPA
August 2008
Report Completed For
Christopher A. Joseph & Associates
610 16'" Street. Suite 514
Oakland. CA 94612
HOL.\IA:\ & ASSOCIATES
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CO:\SULTA:\TS
3615 FOLSO~I STREET
SA:\ FRA:\CISCO, CA 94110
415-550-7286
Ho L~IA:\ .AssOC@CO~ICAST.:\ ET
I:\TROlJUCTIO:\ A:\lJ PRO.IICCT SUMMARY
The South San Francisco Gateway Business Park is a proposed redevelopment project located
in the "East of Highway 101" area of the City of South San Francisco. The Project will be a phased
development but the ent ire 22.7 acre Gateway Business Park Master Plan area is addressed by this
study. The Project is undergoing planning and environmental impact analysis in compliance with the
Calilornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) with the City as Lead Agency. Because the proposed
redevelopment project could atlcet historic or archaeological resources, an inventory of potential
historic properties and cultural resources, assessment of potential impacts, and impact mitigation
measures as warranted arc required under CEQA. Holman& Assoeiateseontraeted with Christopher
A. Joseph & Associates Environmental Planning and Research to conduct this research and complete
this report. with Katrina Hardt-Holoeh of Joseph & Associates' Oakland olliee as Project Manager.
Cultural resource inventory and impact assessment research lor the South San Francisco
Gateway Business Park Project entailed tour steps. A records search lor historic and archaeological
resources was conducted at the Northwest Inlormation Center (NWIC) of the Calilornia Ilistorieal
Resources Inl(Jrlnation System (CHRIS) lirst to determine whether the Project Area or environs had
been previously studied lor resources or contained recorded historic or archaeological resources.
Additional archival research was completed at the San Mateo County Ilistorieal Association
Archives, The History Room of the South San Francisco Public Library, the South San Francisco
Historical Association archives, the archives of the City of South San Francisco's Engineering
Division in the Department of Public Works, and by utilizing in-house resources and other published
sources. A pedestrian and vehicular surlilee surveyofthe Project Area was completed. This report
and the recommendations below constitute the lourth and final step of this initial CEQA analysis.
Although the City of South San Francisco has a rich history and contains numerous recorded
historic resources, and several Native American prehistoric archaeological sites arc recorded on the
margins of San Francisco Bay in and near the City, including in the cast of 101 area, the Gateway
Business Park Project Area was not lound to contain any recorded resources. This area was not part
of the historic development either of the residential/commercial portion of the city (west of the 101
Freeway), nor of the earliest industrial development cast of 10 L In addition, this area has been
developed and redeveloped more than once in the twentieth century, processes that have virtually
completely removed potential lor prehistOlie archaeological deposits, and make the property quite
unlikely to contain signitieant histOlie resources that would be impacted by the proposed project.
Additional cultural resources research, such as subsurlaeereeonnaissanee, appears to be unwarranted
lor the Gateway Business Park Project.
Archival research and lield reconnaissance in the Project impact zones did not discover
indications nor potential lor historic or archaeological resources. These zones have been previously
thoroughly disturbed, with the pre-twentieth century surtilee extensively disturbed ifnot completely
removed and built on several times. The proposed South San Francisco Gateway Business Park
Project should be able to go lorward without adversely atlceting signilieant cultural resources, subject
to the recommendation at the end ofthis report, which should be incorporated into permit conditions.
-1-
THIO PRO.IIOCT ARL\
Location and Settinl(
The South San Francisco Gateway l3usiness Park Project Area(GI3PPA) is located in South San
Francisco's "East of 101" area, which has historically been the industrial, manulaeturing, and
commercial area of the city. The GI3PP A coincides exactly with the SSFGI3P Master Plan Area and
contains 22,7 acres (in the Master Plan area: Kenkay Associates 2(08), bounded on the north by
Oyster Point 130ulevard and three business parcels on that road, on the west by Gateway 130ulevard,
on the cast by the fonner Southern Paeilie Railroad railbed casement (now a vacant narrow strip),
and on the south by a parcel occupied by a hotel. Uses of the East of 101 area have changed through
time since it was initially the location of large meat processing and packing houses in the 1890s,
lollowed by various other heavy and light industries (steel, ship building, paint filetories) and
succeeded by other uses, the latest being most notably biotech and intormation technology, The
proposed GI3PP is the next in this line of changes in land use,
The East of 101 area is contained on the U,S, Geological Survey "San Francisco South" 7,5
minute topographic quadrangle, a portion of which is reproduced here as "Map I," and is in
Township 3 South, Range 5 West (Mt. Diablo M&I3), The GI3PPA contains tour parcels currently
designated as 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, and 1000 Gateway 130ulevard, The property currently is
already named the "Gateway l3usiness Park," and is entirely developed, with the exception of the
narrow SPRR casement, with six buildings, streets and parking, landscaping and ancillary teatures
covering the entire area. Access to the Project Area is otr both Oyster Point and Gateway
130ulevards. The Project Area is served by municipal utilities (Calitornia Water Service, South San
Francisco Sanitary District, PG&E) but also has private wastewater and storm drain pipelines,
To po l(ra I) h ic/Geolol(i ca II B i 0 pit" sic a I
The Project Area is on what was once a ncar-island in San Francisco l3ay, In the 1800s the East
of 101 area was a hilly peninsula, Point San I3runo, with elevations reaching over 150 feet,
surrounded by l3ay marshlands at the northwest, southwest and south, and by open l3ay waters to the
cast, connected to the Peninsula by a narrow neck of dry land (l3aehe 1854: Hotlimn 1873:
Anonymous 1895-98: USGS 1897), The low marshy areas arc now almost entirely tilled and on the
south side have been developed tor over a century, The GI3PP A still has the generally northwest
aspect of the aboriginallandt()1111, rising gently ti.om south to north and cast to west: elevation now
ranges ti.om less than 30 teet msl along Oyster Point 130ulevard to about 60 teet along the easterly
boundary. The natural contours have been entirely altered by development: the slope was originally
more pronounced and both lower at the northwest and higher at southeast. The property is currently
terraced tor building pads and parking lots, but elevation of the pads varies little,
Franciscan Complex metamorphosed marine rocks compose the bedrock of Point San I3runo,
overlain by Pleistocene Colma Formation indurated sandstone, bedded sands, and elay and
mudstones, Fill overlies the Project Area, derived tiOln Colma Formation materials that "comprised
-3-
the hills of Point San Bruno that were removed prior to construction ofthe [existing] industrial park"
(Dames and Moore 1998:i). The original topography was extensively altered beginning in the late
nineteenth century, the upper soils, indurated sands and clay, and rock removed to permit
construction and lor use as bay liIl (Anonymous 1895-98). In 1930 the Project Area had been
extensively graded and lilled and was occupied by several heavy industries (Mark Group 1989). By
1939 the area was traversed by at least two railroad spurs and Oyster Point Boulevard (then Butler
Road) was on the current alignment (USGS 1939). By 1947 steel company buildings arc in the
vicinity but not on the Project Area, which was being redeveloped for other industrial uses (USGS
1947). A circa 1954 aerial photo shows the area covered by large buildings associated with the
Bethlehem Steel Company (South San Francisco Historical Society 2004: III), but the 1955 USGS
maps shows the buildings gone and the area covered by numerous rail spurs, a condition which
remained until the 1968 map was issued (USGS 1955, 1968). A recent geotechnical assessment of
the GBPP A concludes that the area is "characterized by the subsurlilce conditions consisting of the
following general proliles: bedrock exposed at the ground surlilce; native dense sand over bedrock;
compacted lill of native dense sand over bedrock; compacted lill over bedrock" (Kenkay Associates
2008:7). These various impacts over recent history have signilicantly reduced the archaeological
potential of the Project Area; see discussion below.
Prior to the European arrival, the GBPPA would have likely been a windswept grassy hillside,
perhaps supporting a Icw trees and probably willows in any wet spots. Located on a ncar-island
surrounded by the Bay and Baysidc marshes, the area would have been used lor gathering of specific
resources but was unlikely to have been the location I(1r habitation, either seasonal or permanent, due
to the slope and exposure to the prevailing northwest winds. Now flllly developed, the Project Area
supports no native plants unless they have been replanted as landscaping, most of the property being
covered by pavement and buildings.
Ethnol!ra\lhic Settilll!
The Native Americans who owned the San Francisco Bay region, Santa Cruz Mountains and
East Bay Hills, and the Monterey Bay area at the 1769 Spanish invasion arc now most commonly
known as "Ohlones," a name taken li.om a coastal village between Santa Cruz and Half Moon Bay.
Archaeological evidence indicates the ancestral Ohlones arrived in the San Francisco Bay
region-dcpending on location-somewhere around A.D. 500 (Morano 1984), possibly fi.om the lower
Sacramento Valley/Delta, and in the Santa Cruz/Monterey Bay region somewhat later, displacing
earlier populations. Anthropologistsand the Federal Government labeled these people "Costanoans,"
li.om the Spanish "costanos" or coast-dwellers, a linguistic term coined to describe groups speaking
related languages. occupying the coast Irom the Golden Gate to Point Sur and inland to about the
crest of the Diablo Range. Some Indian descendants of these people still prelcr the term
"Costanoan:' while others prelcr "Ohlone" or more readily identify with more specific tribelet names
such as Muwekma or Rumsen/Rumsien.
Currently the best available inl{mmllion indicates that, at the Spanish arrival, the Urehllre tribelet
of the Ohlones/Costanoans held the general Project Area vicinity. The Urehllre group, with
alternative spellings IVlIri\\'lIri, HlIri HlIri, and others, inhabited "the San Bruno Creek arc just south
-4-
of San Bruno Mountain on the San Francisco Peninsula" They "were entirely absorbed into the
Mission San Francisco community by the end of 1785. The Mexican land grant ofBuriburi. patented
in the year 1826. included lands li.om the present city of Millbrae to the present city of South San
Francisco" (Milliken 1995: 258-259). Clearly the Project Area vicinity was pennanently occupied.
probably supporting both permanent and seasonally occupied villages. and very likely had been lor
several millennia or more; whether any of the Project Area was a location of permanent or seasonal
habitation is unknown but seems unlikely. There arc indications that the Project vicinity was used
aboriginally I(lr speeilic tasks. such as gathering and processing lood resources. and the banks of
permanent and seasonal streams and the shores of the Bay contain nearly continuous archaeological
sites. so the entire Project vicinity would have been considered sensitive for prehistoric archaeological
resources had the development history discussed not been the case.
Natural resources of their home areas provided f(Jr nearly all the needs of the aboriginal Ohlone
populations. The prehistoric Ohlones were "hunters and gatherers." a term that may connote a
transient. unstable and "primitive" lilc. materially poor. constantly fending off starvation. While
undoubtedly recurrent lack o I' resources and cultural strile did not make lilC perpetually easy. in many
ways the fndians of Central Calil(lrnia practiced a lilcstyle similar to contemporary agricultural
peoples elsewhere. The Ohlones had adapted to and managed their abundant local environment so
well that some places were continuously occupied I(Jr literally thousands of years. Compared to
modern standards. population density always remained relatively low. but the Ohlone area. especially
around Monterey and San Francisco Bays. was one of the most densely lived-in areas of prehistoric
Calilornia lor centuries. The Ohlones had perlected living in and managing myriad slightly dillering
environments. varying with location, some rich enough to allow large permanent villages of
"collectors" to exist, others less abundant and l110rc encouraging ofa more 1110bilc "forager" way of
lilc. Littoral (shoreline) and riparian environments were obviously more productive and were
thercf(lre most sought out. most intensively utilized and occupied. and most jealously delined and
guarded. Uplands and redwood areas were less productive and less intensively used and occupied
than the ocean and Bay coasts and riparian corridors. As throughout Central California. the acorn
was the dietary staple of the Ohlones. with Black and Tanoak most lavored. but a huge number of
l10ral and lilll11al resources were utilized. Like other native Calilornians, the Ohlone managed their
environment to improve it lor their use; I(Jr example. by burning grass and brush lands annually to
improve lorage I(lr deer and rabbits. keep the land open and more sale li.om predators and their
neighbors. and improve productivity of many resources they used.
The basic unit ofOhlone society was the "tribelet," a small independent group of usually related
lillnilies occupying a specilic territory and speaking the same language or dialect. An incredible
diversity oflanguages had evolved in Central California. evidence of centuries of in-place divergence
o I' very small social groups. Early linguists encountered some groups o I' only 50-1 00 people speaking
distinct languages sometimes but not generally unintelligible to their neighbors. Inter-tribelet
relationships were socially and economically necessary however. to supply both marriage partners and
goods and services not available locally. Trade and marriage patterns were usually but not always
dictated by proximity; traditional enemies were usually also de lined by proximity. Regionallcstivals
and religious dances would bring groups together during periods of suspended hostilities.
-5-
Traditional trade patterns thousands of years old were operating when the Spanish invaded.
Trade supplied the Ohlones with products fi.om sources sometimes several hundred kilometers distant
and allowing export of products unique to their region. I [istorieally. Ohlone groups traded most with
each other. but also exchanged regularly with the Plains and Coast Miwok, Yokuts, Salinans and
Esselens to the south, and North Coast Ranges groups such as the I'omo. Of particular interest
arehaeologieally arc imported obsidian and exported marine mollusk shell beads and ornaments.
Obsidian has the use[i.d property of each source having a unique chemical "[ingerprint," allowing
obsidian arti[aets to be sourced to a specific locality of origin, as well as being datable by technical
methods ("hydration"). Obsidian was obtained by the Ohlones fiOln the North Coast Ranges and
Sierran sources, in patterns that changed through time. By [769, the Ohlones had been trading for
or buying finished obsidian arrowheads of specific forms, manu bet ured by North Coast Range tribes,
for hundreds of years. Shell beads and ornaments, a major export fi.om the Ohlone regions, were
made primarily li.om the shells of abalone (Holio/is), Purple Olive snail (aliveI/o), and Washington
clam (Soxidoll1l1s), all ocean coast species. Shell beads and ornaments evolved through many
ditlerent and definable types through the millennia, allowing chronological typing of these common
artif~lets to serve as a key to the age and relative cultural position of archaeological complexes. These
beads were traded for thousands of years, and have been [ound in prehistoric sites up and down
California and many kilometers cast, into the Great Basin, showing that prehistoric peoples on the
coast were tied into an "international" system of trade. At the time of the Spanish invasion, some
Central Calilornians had developed a system o I' exchange currency or "money" based on elam shell
disk beads: the extent to which the Ohlones related to that system is unknown.
The small tribe let groups were at once independent and interdependent. Trade with neighbors
in goods, and wives, is strongly attested in both the archaeological record and ethnographic accounts.
These relationships otten moved both goods-particularly obsidian and shell beads-and sometimes
individuals long distances, though again proximity was always the key tiletor in intensity 0 finteraetion
(Milliken [995). Asnoted, control ofterritory and resources was jealously guarded. Such interaction
also included a signi[ieant component of interpersonal and intergroup violence, fi'OIll individual
disputes and clan !Cuds up to a level reasonably described as warf~lre (with the goal of displacing
neighbors and laying elaim to their desirable resources). The most typical weapons were the short
thrusting spear and the bow and arrow, and archaeological evidence of use of both on human victims
is not lacking. The Spanish also reported ongoing multigenerational feuds or wart~lre in Ohlone
territory. Such violence was accorded social approval and prestige, as exemplified by the practice
of dismembering dead toes, taking and displaying trophy heads, and composing powerti.d "songs of
insult or vengeance" toward one's enemies (Kroeber [925:468-4(9). Postmortem dismemberment
of human remains has been documented at several Ohlone area sites (Wiberg [993,2002: Grady et
aL 200 [: Hylkema 2002). The too-common stereotype of Central Calilornia natives as altogether
peaceable and passive in the lace of threats-such as the Spanish invasion-is contradicted by both
historic and archaeological evidence. As everywhere, the struggle lor resources and territory, as well
as individual disputes, otten led to violence in the Ohlone tribelets.
Absolute and relative dating of archaeological sites, the linguistic diversity, and demonstrably
ancient trade patterns all indicate that the Ohlones and other Central California groups had reached
a state of demographic and social stability unimaginable to modern eity-dwellers--a state in which the
-6-
same finnily groups occupied the same location continuously for hundreds or even thousands o I' years
with few if any changes in population size or profile. This long term stability is ret1eeted in the
homogeneity of archaeological sites spanning wide geographic and temporal ranges.
Archaeological Context
Prehistoric archaeological sites typically occur at locations offering suitable combinations of
characteristics and resources needed by ancient populations; the more favorable characteristics occur
at a given location. tbe more likely it was to have been used, with intensity and longevity o fuse-and
hence, archaeological visibility-also varying with those criteria. Such locations that otlered reliable
fi.esh water, plant and animal resources, lithic resources. and defensibility but also the possibility of
contact with neighbors, and suitable physical traits such as relatively level land. accessibility, and good
weather. also varied through time as California's environment varied. so locations now favorable may
not have been so in the distant past and vice versa. Environmental change thus caused sites to be
clustered in ditlerent locations during different time periods. However. some places appear to have
been filVored-or disfavored-for long periods, otien thousands of years. Sites over 9000 years old
have been found in interior Santa Clara and Santa Cruz County in locations perhaps later unlikely to
harbor permanent aboriginal habitation. while other locations exhibit sporadic or virtually constant
habitation fi.om even that early to the present day. Still, generally still-extant natural landforms will
provide the best clues to the locations of potential archaeological sites. As elsewhere, more recent
sites arc more likely to be discovered due to being more numerous. in better states of preservation,
nearer or on tbe surfilee, and less likely to have been covered or erased by erosion or rising water
levels. ft appears likely tbat many older sites once created on the ocean coast arc now inundated by
tbe ocean rising over the last several tbousand years.
As evidenced by the antiquity ofa few sites, the Santa Cruz and San Mateo coasts and general
Bay Area have been hospitable to human populations for at least six millennia. Prehistoric sites arc
found in most environmental zones fi.om the ocean coast and coastal terrace well up into the steep
hills to the cast, and then back down the drainages and all around the margin of the Bay. Sites arc
most numerous along tbe few perennial streams on the Peninsula Bayside such as Colma, San Bruno.
San Mateo, Laurel, and San Franeisquito Creeks, and around marshlands such as formerly existed
around large portions of the Bay. Locations such as the Project Area-hilly, probably grass covered,
and subject to the cold prevailing nortbwest winds-would still have otlered some resources attractive
to prehistoric populations during parts of each year and would have been used, but were less
attractive than other nearby areas of concentrated resources along perennial streams and the Bay
margin. An old Bayside site (>5000 years) is found next to fanner Bay marshland at the foot of San
Bruno Mountain. numerous sites occur along Colma Creekjust to the south. and Nelson's f 909 map
of Bay Area shell mounds shows sites at the north and south shores of Point San Bruno, but no
prehistoric sites arc recorded in or very near the Project Area (Clark f998: Nelson (909).
-7.
PRO.IICCT RICSL\RCH M ICTHOllS A:"ill RICSULTS
Records Search
A ncw records search was conducted in July 200X at the Northwest Inlormation Center(NWIC)
of the Calil(Jrnia Ilistorieal Resources Inl(JrInation System (CHRIS) lor the Gateway l3usiness Park
Project. The records search was completed by the NWIC stall: revealing that several archaeological
surveys had been nearly adjacent to the Project Area but none were recorded within the area;
numerous other surveys arc recorded within 500 meters of the GI3PPA. Numerous South San
Francisco historic resources arc recorded at various levels (Ollice of Historic Preservation Directory,
Calilornia Inventory, State Points of llistorical Interest, CllRIS records, Calil(lrnia Register of
Ilistoric Resources, National Register ofllistoric Places, County and City historic resources listings,
etc,): however none arc recorded inside or within 500 m of the Project Area.
Most of the archaeological or historic resource surveys near the Project Area have been lineal.
lor road improvement, pipelines, liber optic cables, etc, (I3rown et aL 2003; Leach-Palm and l3yrd
2005,2006; l3ioSystems Analysis 19X9: llatoll' et al. 1995: Sawyer et aL 2000: Nelson et aL 2002:
Clark 2002, 2002a, 2005, 2005a, 2005b), with only one covering a contiguous nonlinear project area
near Oyster Point (William Self Associates 2005), None of the surlace surveys recorded either
prehistoric or historic archaeological resources or historic properties, Two survey reports evaluated
subsurlilcepotential on Gateway and Oyster Point 130ulevards, concluding that the portions o I' Oyster
Point 130ulevard built on lill over l3ay margin marshlands, perhaps including the intersection with
Gateway, might have archaeological potential (Clark 2002, 2002a).
The NWIC File Number lor the Phase II Records Search is 07-17X2, A copy of this report will
be submitted lor inclusion in the permanent CllRIS archives,
The City 0 I' South San Francisco's llistoric Preservat ion Commission also maintains an Historic
Resources Survey (19X6), which locuses on historic buildings, architecture, and sites ofsignilicance
in the City, The Ilistoric Resources Survey docs not list any resources in or near the Project Area,
and none in the entire East of 101 area,
Archival Research
In addition to the archaeological records search, archival research was conducted at the archives
and records of the Engineering Division of the City of South San Francisco's Department of Public
Works (ED/[)PW), at the San Mateo County Historical Association Archives (SMCIIAA) in
Redwood City, at the llistory Room of the South San Francisco Public Library (Grand Avenue
I3ranch) and at the South San Francisco Ilistorical Society archives, The ED/OPW archives concern
primarily work done on City property, such as Oyster Point and Gateway 130ulevards, but also
include drainage improvements, wastewater treatment improvements, and lill. erosion stabilization,
and grading projeetson some private properties. The SMCllAA contain inl(JrInation about the whole
-8-
county, with spccific information arrangcd by citics and many othcr topics: this archivc also contains
numcrous historic maps. Thc Ilistory Room and Ilistorical Society arc focuscd spccilically on thc
history of the City and contain matcrials not lound elsewherc. Additional rcsourccs in posscssion of
thc author werc also utilized.
Historic maps help reconstruct the natural topography and development history of the Project
Area. The earliest map of the vicinity with useli." accuracy is Bache's 1854 coast survey of Point San
Bruno, which shows the extensive marshlands north and south of the point and the high spots
standing above the Bay. The 1868 Oflieial County Map shows the Project Area property is owned
by cattle baron Charles Lux, but no development yet on San Bruno Point (Easton 1868). An early
State map of 1873 shows an early road running in the approximate alignment of the Highway 101
near the GBPPA but no other developments (llol1inan 1873). The 1877 County map shows the
same, but also shows the many "parcels" drawn out into the Bay around the point, both for oyster
fisheries and for potential later filling (Cloud 1877). By 1894 the San Bruno Point property is owned
by the South San I'rancisco Land & Improvement Company (SSFL&IC) and the first abattoirs on the
south side of the point have appeared, as the city is being built as a company town by the major
meatpaekers who operated on the point (Bromlield 1894). By 1895 the vicinity of the Project Area
is owned by the Selby Smelting and Lead Company, and a "smelting railroad" spur runs to the
northeast west ofmodern Gateway Boulevard (Anonymous 1895-98): the Coast and Geodetic Survey
map of 1895 docs not show these features, but docs show the still-existing marshland to the north
of the Project Area (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey 1895). The 1897 and 1899 USGS topographic
maps show no buildings or other development in or near the Project Area, and the rounded hills just
to the cast still at their natural elevations.
By 1909, the Oflicial County Map shows much more development on San Bruno Point. which
has been more divided among property owners, with several rail spurs and new roads, though none
in the specific Project Arca. Thc projcct vicinity has revertcd to SSI'L&IC owncrship, Selby Smelting
having given up thc westcrn half of the property, but the smelting rail spurs still show (Neuman
1909). The 1915 USGS topographic quadrangle shows the smclting rail spur now almost
surrounding the still extant high spots on thc northwest ofthc Point San Bruno, but now thc spur is
connected directly to the large Southern Pacific Railroad switching yard west of the Projcct Arca.
Thc first road on the approximate alignment of modern Oyster Point Boulevard is also shown by
1915. A 1915 newspaper article shows a plan for improvements to the harbor with new docks and
a northern brcakwater, new rail lines, expanded stockyards, stcel and other heavy industrial plants,
and more fill around thc northcrn shore in the vicinity of the Projcct Area (Anonymous 1915), but
most of this plan was never complcted as planncd or completed much later (post World War II). The
1927 County map shows the Project Area probably owned by thc Pacific Coast Steel Company, with
a foundry pcrhaps located on the northwest of the Project Area. It is evident that by the 1920s much
of the land had been graded and the hills terraced and lowered for fill material (Kneese 1927). A
1989 compilation map of the industrial development cast of 101 in 1930 shows the Project Area
owned by Pacific Coast Steel and numerous industrialfhcilities in the vicinity: it is likely the majority
of the Project Area had been graded and/or filled by then (Mark Group 1989). Butler Road, now
Oyster Point Boulevard, runs on the current alignment near the Project Area by the mid-1920s.
Another compilation map of the history of filling around Point San Bruno shows that north of Butler
-9-
Road had been lilled "pre- I 958" (in the I 920s) to create the present-day configuration and the hills
to the cast had been lowered somewhat (Mark Group 1988).
The 1939 and 194 I USGS topographic quadrangles show the Project Area with two, three. or
even lour railroad spurs running cast/west and northeast/southwest, several of which cross the
property, which had obviously been terraced lor the railbeds by then. The area still contains
numerous steel, wire, and other laundries and heavy industrial plants by the mid- I 930s, so it is likely
the entire Project Area had been industrialized prior to World War If. The 1947 map shows even
more rail spurs into the Project Area vicinity, probably related to shipbuilding at Oyster Point during
the war. The northern end of what would become Eccles Avenue cast of the Project Area is shown
by 1947, and the nearest hill is now squared-oil' on the western slope; several unlabeled buildings
stand in the Project Area (USGS 1939, 194 I, 1947). The 1950 County map shows most of the
property now owned by l3ethlehem Steel, though buildings arc not shown, with the exception of the
northwest portion on Oyster Point 130ulevard, where smaller parcels arc divided by the northern
beginning of Gateway 130ulevard (Grant 1950). The 1955 topographic quadrangle docs not show
the start o I' Gateway, but docs show six or seven railroad spurs in the vicinity, and the southernmost
high spot of the westerly hills is now a "Gravel Pit." The 1968 topographic map shows virtually the
same arrangement, prior to redevelopment of this area (USGS 19(8)
Historic aerial photos of the Project Area vicinity also show that the entire area was virtually
stripped of native vegetation and soils prior to and probably again during World War If. An October
1943 aerial photo shows the many rail spurs cut into the sloping hillside, the southern portion of the
Project Area stripped of soil, and the northwest portion on Oyster Point 130ulevard containing a large
industrial building surrounded by smaller structures and parking lots (National Archives 1943). A
postwar photo taken in July 1946 shows much the same situation, but the cuts lor the rail spurs arc
more eroded, exposing lighter subsoil (National Archives 1946). As noted above, a eirea- I 954 aerial
photo looking northeast (rather than straight down as do the National Archive/USGS photos) shows
the area covered by large buildings associated with the l3ethlehem Steel Company, and the hillside
rising eastward looks devastated (South San Francisco I listorieal Society 2004: I I I). An April 1968
aerial looks remarkably the same, but the rail spurs have been removed (although they show on the
topographic quad of the same year), Eeeles Avenue is in place, and the "gravel pit" south of the
Project Area has been filled (USGS 1968a).
The City's EDIDPW records also help illustrate the extend of grading, lilling, stripping, and
general rearranging of the topography in and around the GI3PPA. The western portion of l3utler
Road/Oyster Point 130ulevard was originally built on fill over l3ay Mud, and consequently subsided
for years therealler, necessitating additional liIls in the vieinityofGateway 130ulevard. The "Plan and
Prolile lorthe improvement ofl3utler Road Est ofl3ayshore I lighway" dates to April I 942 and shows
up to lour feet of additional fill to be placed over the existing road (Klassen I 942). Later plans li.om
1957 to 1963 detail additional lills for this portion of Oyster Point (Anonymous 1957: SSF DPW
1957; SSF DPW 19(3) A plan lor the "Location of Road, l3ethlehem Steel Property, S.S.F." li'om
1963 shows a "scavenger road" being graded into and across the current Project Area to aid removal
of steel company lileilities and remnants (Anonymous 19(3). Less than six months later, a "Street
Improvement Plan. Spur Track Removal, Oyster Point I3lvd, SSF, CA" plan shows redevelopment
-to.
of the vicinity moving rapidly (Survey Construction Staking 1964). A blue print plan dated May 1965
shows Oyster Point 130ulevard improvements liOln Gateway eastward. with fill over ten teet thick
at the intersection and cuts up to eight leet to the cast where the hillside I(wmerly rose. and fill being
placed on the northern portion o I' Gateway 130ulevard (Wilsey. Ilam & I3lair 19(5). Gateway dates
to atler 1968. and the 900 feet southward fi.om Oyster Point appears to date fi.om the late 1970s.
when another phase o I' redevelopment transf(JI1ned the area. Redevelopment of this area moved more
quickly in some specific projects than others. as noted in a 2000 EIR that states "All industrial
buildings associated with steel and ship-building originally dating fi.om 1913 were last demolished in
the 1980s" (Morehouse Associates 2000: 13-1). Improvements to Gateway 130ulevard took place in
the early 1980s. when the Gateway Assessment District was lonned to fileilitate redevelopment, as
when improved wastewater collection laeilities were installed in 1982, reflecting changing uses of the
Project Area (Kenkay Associates 2008). The major buildings currently on the GI3PPA were
constructed over ten years. commencing in 1988 and finishing in 1998 (Joseph & Associates 2008).
In sum. historic research for the Gateway l3usiness Park Project Area shows the property to
have been initially impacted by development late in the nineteenth century. and to have undergone
several episodes of redevelopment at a quickening pace into the twenty-first century. Study of
historic maps, historic and aerial photos, City Engineering Division records, and analyses conducted
for the proposed development and previous developments in the East of 101 Area show that the
entire Project Area has undergone extensive alterations. such that it is unlikely that any portion of the
area contains undisturbcd native soils. either exposed or covered by fill. The property has basically
been graded and strippcd, built on. then those features demolished, the area graded again, built on.
redeveloped, built on again, and is about to be cleared and redeveloped once again.
Field Survev
A pedestrian reconnaissance for archaeological or other historic resources was conducted 0 rthe
Project Area, or rather. attempted. The entire Project Area, as described. is developed and no portion
of the land surfilce atlorded an examination of possible native soils or even natural. historic contours.
The entire project impacts zone is covered by buildings and other structures. pavement, and modern
landscaping.
-II.
CO:'iCLUSIO:\S A:'ill RIOc<nlMIO:'illATIO:\S
The Gateway l3usiness Park Project Area has been examined both by field survey and by
extensive archival research to assess the potential for possibly significant historic resources. The
history and current state of the Project Area indicate it is in all likelihood entirely disturbed by
development and land use dating back more than a century. It has been graded and stripped down
to culturally sterile subsoil (and later filled over in some portions) more than once. has been recently
redeveloped (f 988- f 998). causing another round of disturbance. and is quite unlikely to contain
archaeological or other subsurfflee historic resources. There is no evidence of and very scant
potential ftlr historic resources in this Project Area. Subsurfilee reconnaissance of the Project Area
cannot be justified in this instance.
No additional historic resources research or evaluation under provisions ofCEQA is warranted.
nor recommended. The proposed redevelopment project should be enabled to go forward without
atleeting potential historic resources. Ilowever. the following recommendation should be
incorporated into permit conditions to address the very low potential that cultural resources will be
encountered.
Recommendation
Although no archaeological or historic resources were lound in the Gateway l3usiness Park
Project Area. it is possible that subsurtilee deposits may exist or that evidence of such resources has
been obscured by more recent natural or cultural factors. Archaeological and historic resources arc
protected fiOln unauthorized disturbance by State law. and supervisory and construction personnel
should therefore be made aware of the possibility. however low. of encountering archaeological
materials in this location.
In this area. the most common and recognizable evidence of prehistoric archaeological resources
arc deposits of shell and/or bones. usually in fi.agments. and usually in a darker fine-grained soil
(midden): chert. obsidian and other stone flakes leti fh1l11manufileturing stone tools. or the tools
themselves or ground stone (mortars. pestles. grinding slabs. arrowheads and spear points). other
artifacts (shell beads. bone tools. etc.). and human burials. olien as dislocated bones. Historic
materials older than 45 years-bottles. artifacts. privy and disposal pits. structural remains. etc.-may
also have scientific and cultural significance and should be more readily identified. If during the
proposed construction project any such evidence is uncovered or encountered. all excavations within
10 meters/30 feet should be halted long enough to call in a qualified archaeologist to assess the
situation and propose appropriate measures.
-12-
u.s. Coast Survey Map or San Francisco Bay Region. Ms. map in the Maps Room. University
or Calij(1rI1ia. Berkeley.
BioSystems Analysis. Inc.
1989 Technical Reporl o(Cultural Resources SI",liesfi)r Ihe Proposed IVTG-IVES7: Inc. Los Angeles
to Sail Francisco alld Sacramento, CalUhrllia, FIher Optic Cahle j)n~ject. Report on file,
Northwest Information Center. Califi.xnia Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma
State University: File No. S-011396.
Bromlield. D.
1894 Official Map 0( San Malea Call1lll'. Calif;mlia. In the ArehivL" or the San Mateo County
Ilistorieal A"oeiation. Redwood City.
Brown. Kyle. Adam Marlow. James Allan. and William Sell'
2003 Cllltural Resources Assessment q{ Alterllutil'c Routes .ti)r PG&E's .J(tfCrsOIl-Alarill
J;'(fl/smissio/l Lille, Sail Ala/co COllllty. Cal{ji)rllia. Report on file, Northwest Information
Center. California llistorical Resources In!()rmation System. Sonoma Stale University; File No.
S-027930.
Clark. Mauhew R.
199H Ewi/uufh'c Archaeological Eycal'ut;o/ls at the Sail Bruno .i.l!olfll!a;1I A4olll/(f Site, CA-SAIA-40,
South Sail Frallcisco, Calfjhl'llia. Report on file, Northwest In!()rmation Center, California
I lislorieal Resources In!(>nnation System, Sonoma State University. Coyote Press, Salinas, CA.
Initial Archaeological Resources Proceduresjhr National Historic Presernllion Act Section
106 Compliance.fiJl' the Ci(r (dSoutlz Sail Francisco IVet IVeather Program Sewer and IVater
Treatment Pn?iect. Report completed for .Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, Berkeley, and submitted
to City of South San Francisco and State \Vater Resources Control Board, Sacramento.
Cit)' (~l SOllth Sail Francisco IVet Ireatlrer Program Pn~iect: Research Des(~njiJr Historic
Properties Idcntfjicatioll.fiJr ,\-ratiollal Historic PreselTation Act Scction 106 Compliancc.fhr
I'hase Il'rojecl Elemellls. Report on lile at the Department or Public Works. City of South San
Francisco, and on file, North\vesl Information Center, Calit()rnia llistorical Resources
lnlhrmation System, Sonoma State Univ'ersity.
Anonymous
ca. 1895-98
1915
1957
1963
Bache. A.D.
1854
2002
2002a
Cloud. J.c.
1877
RICFICRICi\CICS
[Untitled] Portion or historic map copy in the South San Francisco Ilistorieal Society Archives.
[Newspaper/Magazine article re:] ...seo Uridge Company of San Francisco Is Awarded The
Contract For The ...rst Unit or South San Franeiseo's Great Ilarbor Project. Copy ora portion
ofunkno\Vn periodical printed in "South San Francisco. San Mateo County. Cal.. Saturday. May
22.1915 No. 21." In the South San Francisco Ilistorieal Society Archives.
Proposed Improvements: Butler Road to Ilcaly-Tibbitts Yard. Dated April 30. 1957. Archives
of the Division of Engineering. Department of Public Works. City of South San Francisco.
Document D 1 0-91 o.
Location or Road. Bethlehem Steel Property. South San Francisco (Scavenger Road in
Connection \vilh Buller Road). Archives of the Division of Engineering, lkpartmenl of Public
Works. City of South San Francisco. Document DIO-928.
Offici,,1 Map o(the COUll I)' of Sa II M"leo. C"lifiJr/li". In the Archives orthe San Mateo County
Ilistorieal Association. Redwood City.
-13-
Dames & Moore, Inc.
1998 Phase I Ell vironmen tal Site Assessment, Gateway Business Park. 750-/000 GateH'((l' Boulenll'f.!,
SOllth Sall Frallcisco, Califi)mia. Report prepared lor AEGON USA Realty Advisors, Inc.
Report provided by Christophcr A. Joseph & Associates, Oakland, CA.
Easton, A. S.
1868 Olficial Map a(the COllotl' o(Sao Mateo, Calif;m/ia: locllldillg the Citl' alld COlllltl' o(Sall
Frallcisco. In the Arehiv'es of the San Mateo County llistorieal Association, Redwood City.
Grady, Dianc L.. Kathcrine A. Latham, and V.A. Andrusko
2001 Archacologicallnvestigations at CA-SCL-674, the Rubino Site, San Jose, Santa Clara County,
California. Coyote Press /Jrchil'es ill Calflorl/ia Prehisto/:J' Number 50. Salinas, CA.
Grant, Mark A.
1950 Official Map o( Sail Mateo COllllty, Califim/ia. In thc Archives of' thc San Mateo Coonty
Ilistorieal Association, Redwood City.
lIaton; !.lrian. !.larb Voss. Sharon Waechter. Stephen Wce. and Vance !.lente
1995 Cultural Resources 11l\,(:l/t()}~I' Report.fhr the Proposed Ah~jan! }\:'ortlllrard Expallsioll P}'(~ject.
Report on file. Northwest Infi.)rmation Cenler. California Historical Resources Infi.)rmation
System. Sonoma State University; File No. S-017933.
1I0llinan. C.F.
1873 Alap q(the Region fl{(jacelltto the Bay (dSan Frallcisco. State Geological Surv'ey of California.
Ms. map in the Maps Room. University of' Calil<lI'Ilia. !.lerkeley.
lIylkema. Mark G.
2002 Tidal Marsh. Oak Woodlands. and Cultural Florescence in the Southern San Francisco !.lay
Region. In Catalysts to Compll'xi~\': Late Holocl'lle Societies (?(the Calf/in'lIia Coast, edited by
J. M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones. PI'. 233-262. ColSen Institute of' Archaeology. University of'
California, Los Angeles.
Christopher A. Joseph & Associates
2008 Gatcl1'a)' Busilless Park ,HasteI' Plall .Administratil'(! Dn{/'t Ellvirollmental Impact Report
[Prelimill"'Y Workillg Drafi). Christopher A. Joseph & Associates. Oakland. CA.
Kenkay Associates
2008 GatClray Business I>ark ,-Haster Plan, South Sail Francisco, CA. Rep0l1 prepared for
Chamberlin Associates. Rcport onlile. City of' South San Francisco.
Klasscn. R.A. (City Engineer)
1942 AlapSI1011'//lg I>roposcd Alailltclla1/cc Clwllllds illthc LOlI'er Colllla Creck South SaIl Fra/lcisco
- CalfjiJrnia. Archives of the Department of Engineering. City of South San Francisco.
Document DII-I079.
Kneese, George A.
1927 Official Map o( Sail iV/ateo COlllltl', Calif;m/ia. In the Archives of the San Mateo County
lIistorical Association. Redwood City.
Kroebe!'. Alf'red L.
1925 Halldlwok o(Calif;m/ia IlIdiallS. !.lurcau of' American Ethnology !.lulletin 78. (1976 reprinted
edition, Dover Publications, New York).
Leach-Palm. Laura. and !.lrian F. !.lyrd
2005 A rchaeologicallJ/l'l'lltOly.fiJr thl' South Sail Francisco Four-Trackillga//(I NewStatiolll>}'(~jl'ct,
Caltrain PCllillsula Corridor Lille, Sail "",:/atl'o COllllty, CalfjiJrnia, From the A'orth (~(Tullllcl
Al'c/we ill Brishane, ,lIP 6.1, to Colow Creek ill Sail Brullo, AlP 9. 72. Reporl on file, Northwest
Information Center. Califi]rnia Ilislorical Resources Information System, Sonoma State
Universily; Filc No. S-030760.
-14-
Leach-Palm, Laura, and Llrian F. l3yrd
2006 Archaeological I/ll'l:>/Ito/)' .Ii),. the SouIII Sa1/ Francisco Station alld Track Work l'n~j(!ct.
Coltrain Peninslila Corridor Linc, Sail .i..\"latc() COlll/ty. CalfjiJrllia, From tile iVortll (~lTlfllllcl
An>lllfe ill Brishane, AlP 6,1, to Scott Street ill Sail Brul/o, AlP jO.6. Report on file. NOrlhwest
Information Center, California llistorical Resources Information System. Sonoma State
University; File No. S.031 H24,
Mark Group Engineers and Geologists. Inc.
19HH Addendum to the lIydrogeologieal Assessmem Report The O'Llrien Corporation, South San
Francisco. California: Drawing No. 4-1: Historical Shorelines and Knov..'11 Fill Areas. Archives
of the South San Francisco Ilistorieal Society.
19H9 San l3runo Channel Fill Investigation, South San Francisco, Calif()rnia. Archives of the South
San Francisco llislorical Society.
Milliken, Randall T.
1995 A Time (~lLittle Choice: The Disintegration (d'Tribal Culture ill the S([/1 j---'rallcis('() Bay Area
1769-1810. Llallena Press Anthropological Papers No. 43. LlaIlena Press, Menlo Park, CA.
Mora((o, Michael J.
191'<4 Cal!fi)rl7ia Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
Morehouse Associates
2000 Dn{!i Supplcmental Enl'iro/lmcl7tal/mpact Report, Bay IVcst COJ11mercial/)n~jcct (Former~r
Sheanraler Projee!). Report prepared 1(1I' and on lile with the City or South San Francisco.
National Archives
1943 Aerial Photograph: CAN 10356, DDl3-2l3-135, dated 10-11-43. National Archives, Washington,
D.c'
1946 Aerial Photograph: CAN 10356,2-24 GS-CP, dated 7-29-46. National Archives, Washington,
D.C.
Nelson, Nels C.
1909 Shellmollnds of the San Francisco Bay Region. Unil'ersi(l' (~/' CalffiJrniu Puhlications in
AmericuII Archaeology alld Ethnology 7:309-356. Berkeley.
Nelson, Wendy J., Tammara Norton, Larry Chiea, and Reinhard Pribish
2002 Arc!we%gic{fl /IIl'elltO}~I' .fiN" the Ca/traill Electr?/icatioll /)rogram /lIternath'e in San
Francisco, Sail A1atco, and Sallta Clara Countics, Cal!fi)rllia. Report on tile, Northwest
Information Center, California llistorieal Resources Information System, Sonoma State
University; File No. S-029657.
Neuman, J. V.
1909 1909 Ott/e/al Map o{Sall klaleo COllIIIV. Cal/tim,/a. Redwood City, CA. In the Archives orthe
San Mateo County lIistorieal Association, Redwood City.
William Self Associates, Ine,
2005 Historic Property Sw'\'ey Report, Sail Francisco Bay JVater Tral/sit Al/t1lOri(\', South Sail
Francisco Ferl~\' Terminal Pn~jcct, Oyster Point A/arilla alld Park, City (~lSolflh Sail Francisco,
Sail A/ateo COllnty, Calf/,orllia. Report on tile, Northwest Information Center, California
lIistorieal Resources InJ(mnation System, Sonoma State University; File No. S-030163.
Sawyer, Izaak, Lauric PfeilYer, Karen Rasmussen, and Judy Llerryman
2000 Archaeological SW'l'ey alollg OJ/shore Portiolls (~(the Glohal JVcst Fiher Optic Cahle Pn~ject.
Report on tile, Northwest Information Center. California Ilistorieal Resources Information
System, Sonoma State University; File No. S-022657.
-15-
[City 01] South San Francisco, Dcpartmcnt of Public Works
1957 Lowcr Butler Road Improvcmcnt, City of South San Francisco, Drawing No.1 0-2-57. Datcd 10-
2-57. Archives of the Division of Engineering. Department of Public \Vorks. City of SOllth San
Francisco, Documcnt D I 0-91 O.
1963 "CityofSouth San Francisco: "Butler Road Input" Industrial Way to City Bcach." Datcd 12-16-
63. Archives of the Division of Engineering, Department of Public Works, City of South San
Francisco, Document D I 0-91 0-912.
SOllth San Francisco I listoric Preservation Commission
19H6 lIistoric Resources Survey, City of South San Francisco. Available in the lIistory Room, Somh
San Francisco Public Library (Grand A venue Branch) and at the City Community Development
Department.
South San Francisco lIistorieal Society
2004 Images (~lAl1/eri('a: South Sail Francisco. Arcadia Publishing, San Francisco.
Survey Construction Staking Company
1964 Street Improvement Plan, Spur Track Removal. Oyster Point Blvd, South San Francisco,
Calit()rnia. Dated June 11. 1963. Archives oCthe Division of Engineering. Department of Public
Works, City of South San Francisco, Documel1l D72-72 12.
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
I H95 Paeilic Coast Re-survey of San Francisco Bay Ihl111llunters Point- Southward, California 1 H95.
(W.W. Duf'licld Superil1lendent; Register No. 2206). Inthe Maps Room, UniversityofCalil(mlia
Berkeley.
u.s. Geological Survey
IX97 San Mateo. California 15 minute topographic quadrangle.
1899 San Mateo. California 15 minute topographic quadrangle.
1915 San Mateo, Calif(lrnia 15 minute topographic quadrangle.
1939 San Mateo. Calif(xnia IS minute topographic quadrangle.
1941 San Mateo. Calif(xnia 15 minute topographic quadrangle.
1947 San Francisco South. California 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle.
1955 San Francisco South. California 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle.
1968 San Francisco South. Calillxnia 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle.
196Ha Aerial Photograph GS-VBJZ-I-201. Electronic document accessed li'OI11 the University or
Calif(lI'Ilia Library Web, hnp:l/sunsite.berkelcy.edu/ AeriaIPhotos/vbzj-I-20 l.hn11l; accessed 07
Jan 2005.
Wiberg, Randy S.
1993 Archaeological Impact .i.Hitigatio/l at CA-SCL-194: Rcport (~lNatil'c Amcrican Burials ami
Archaeological Data Reco\,(>/~I' During Constructiol/ Alonitoring at thc fl\'cl/ida ESfJana Scnior
Housing Pn~iect, Sal/Jose. Santa Clara COl/l/(I'. Caf!f()rl/ia. Report prepared IlJr the llollsing
Authority or the County or Sama Clara. Coyote Press, Salinas, CA.
2002 Archacologicalln\'cstigations: SkJ'fJort Pla=a Phasc I (CA-SCL-478J. San Jose. Santa Clara
COl/J/(I'. Calfj()rnia. Report on file. Northv.'est Information Center. Califi.)rnia llistorieal
Resources Information System. Sonoma State University.
Wilsey, Ilam & Blair
1965 Oyster Poim Road fntersection. Dated May 1965. Archives or the Division or Engineering,
Departmel1l or Public Works, City of South San Francisco, Documel1l D I 0-945.
-16-
~ ~_~.:stiJltl-~""-
-..----
Oyster
f3 inr
/
([~
Map I : South San Francisco Gatcway Busincss Park Projcct Arca Location.
(Source: USGS .'San Francisco South" 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle. 1993)
2
APPENDIX F
SOILS REPORT
GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
GATEWAY AND OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD
South San Francisco, California
Chamberlin Associates
Pleasanton, California
18 September 2008
Project No. 4848.01
Treadwell&RoIIo
Environmental & Geotechnical Consultants
TreadwelI&RoIIo
18 September 2008
Project 4848.01
Mr. Rahn Verhaeghe
Chamberlin Associates
5880 West Las Positas Boulevard, Suite 134
Pleasanton, California 94588
Subject:
Geologic and Geotechnical Investigation
Gateway and Oyster Point Boulevard
South San Francisco, California
Dear Mr. Verhaeghe:
We are pleased to submit our geologic and geotechnical investigation report for the redevelopment of the
Gateway Business Park project in South San Francisco. This investigation was performed in general
accordance with our proposal dated 13 May 2008. Additional copies have transmitted as indicated at the end
of this report. This cover letter omits detail findings and conclusions; therefore, anyone relying on the report
should read it in its entirety.
The proposed development includes the removal of the existing six structures and the associated
Improvements and the construction of six new office buildings and four parking garages at the 23 acre
business park. Our scope of services included providing a feasibility study for the over all redevelopment, a
geologic study of the Hillside Fault, recommendations for Buildings 850, 900 and Garages 1 & 2, and
preliminary recommendations for Building 1000.
Subsurface conditions beneath the site consist of fill overlying native clay, sand and bedrock. The groundwater
varies considerably across the site. However, we estimate the high groundwater at the site is at approximately
Elevation 3.5 feet (NGVD 1929 datum) in the vicinity of the proposed Building 1000.
To support the anticipated building loads, we recommend using shallow spread footings. This report presents
our recommendations regarding site preparation and grading, foundation design, slab-on-grade floors,
retaining walls, seismic design, utilities and utility trenches, and flexible pavement design for Buildings 850 and
900 and Garage 1 & 2 (Phase 1). These recommendations should be considered as preliminary for the
remaining phases of the development. Site specific investigation should be performed to develop geotechnical
and foundation design. Criteria for the remaining phases as necessary.
The recommendations contained in the report are based on limited subsurface exploration and laboratory
testing programs. Consequen~y, variations between expected and actual soil conditions may be encountered
in localized areas during construction. Therefore, we should be engaged to observe foundation installation and
fill placement, during which time we may make changes in our recommendations, as deemed necessary.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to Chamberlin Associates. If you have any questions,
please call.
-Garrett R. Harl'is, PE
Senior StaWEhgineer
48480101.0AK.L TR
Richard D. Rodgers, GE
Principal
Sincerely yours,
TREADWELL & ROLLO, INC.