The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUP-93-023 TDM 217 EAST GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PARI~NNG ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR: VDK ARCffiTECTS PREPARED BY: FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY 31, 2001 217 E. Grand Ave. Transportation Demand Management Plan May 2001 I. INTRODUCTION Tularik Inc. is a pharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of drugs based on gene regulation. Founded in 1991, Tularik currently has approximately 340 employees at offices in South San Francisco, New York, and Germany. The corporate headquarters is located at 2 Corporate Drive in South San Francisco, California, and staffs about 315 employees. According to the project sponsor, a recent survey showed that approximately 41 % of employees commute to work via carpool or public transportation. Tulazik is proposing to convert an existing unoccupied wazehouse at 217 East Grand Avenue into general office space. Approximately 18,000 square feet of office space would be generated by the conversion and 90 employees are planned for the facility. (Of these 90 employees, it is expected that at least 10 employees will telecommute and travel to the office site on alternating days.) The conversion of this wazehouse to office space requires a Transportation Demand Management (T'Dtl~ Plan. The purpose of a TDM Plan is to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile trips generated by the new office facility. A TDM Plan consists of a set of strategies, measures, and incentives to encourage the employees to walk, bicycle, use public transportation, carpool, or use other incentives to driving alone. TDM measures produce more mobility using existing transportation systems, boost economic efficiency of the current transportation infrastructure, improve air quality, save energy, and reduce traffic congestion. This TDM Plan was developed based on draft guidelines provided by the City of South San Francisco that set a goal of 35% alternative mode use. The City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG), the local Congestion Management Agency for San Mateo County, provides additional TDM guidelines. However, because the project will produce less than 100 new AM or PM peak hour trips, this project will not have to meet these additional guidelines. The existing transportation facilities serving the project site aze described in Chapter 2. -•~~~'- Chapter 3 presents the South San Francisco Transportation Demand Management strategies. The specific measures that have been selected for Tularik Inc. to meet the 35% alternative mode use goal aze described in Chapter 4. In Chapter 5, a pazking analysis was performed to determine if the additional pazking demand generated by the new office facility would be satisfied by the existing on-site parking supply. Finally, the summary and conclusions are made in Chapter 6. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 II. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The project site is located on the south side of East Grand Avenue, just west of Roebling Road, in South San Francisco, California. The project site location is shown in Figure 1. The existing transportation system in the project azea supports the use of alternative (non- automobile) transportation modes by providing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the site. The existing system is described in detail below and shown in Figure 2. Ezisting Transit Service San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) operates bus service throughout San Mateo County. The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Boazd operates commuter rail service (CalTrain) between San Francisco and Gilroy. Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) provides rail service between the East Bay (Richmond, Pittsburg, Pleasanton, and Fremont) and San Francisco. The existing transit facilities .near the site aze shown on Figure 2 and described in detail below. SamTrans operates numerous bus routes in South San Francisco. Route 292 provides service between Hillsdale Shopping Center in San Mateo and the Transbay Terminal in downtown San Francisco. This bus route operates along Airport Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site. The hours of operation are 5:00 AM to 2:00 AM on weekdays and weekends. Buses run approximately every 30 minutes during the commute and midday and every 60 minutes during the evenings. SamTrans Route 34 provides service between Tanforan Shopping Center in San Bruno and Geneva Avenue in San Francisco. This bus route operates along Airport Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site. The route provides three northbound trips and three southbound trips between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM on weekdays. No weekend service is provided. CalTrain provides frequent train service between San Jose and San Francisco seven days a week. During commute hours, CalTrain provides extended service to Mflrgan Hill~and ~~ ~ _ °~ Gilroy. The South San Francisco-CalTrain station at Dubuque Avenue and Grand`'' 3~r Avenue is located in the vicinity of the project site. Two CalTrain shuttle buses provide service between the South San Francisco station and office buildings in the vicinity of the project site. The Utah-Grand and Oyster Point Employer Shuttle makes seven morning and seven afternoon stops on East Grand Avenue across from the project site. The Gateway Employer Shuttle makes six morning and five afternoon stops at the Tularik headquarters at 2 Corporate Drive. BART provides frequent daily service between East Bay locations and San Francisco seven days a week. The closest BART station to the project site is the Glen Park Station at Diamond Street and Bosworth Street. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Pedestrian facilities comprise sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals. Near the site, sidewalks are located on both sides of East Crrand Avenue. Crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided at nearby signalized intersections. Bicycle facilities comprise bike paths (Class n, bike lanes (Class II), and bike routes (Class III. Bike paths are paved trails that are separated from roadways. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles by striping, pavement legends, and signs. Bike routes are roadways that aze designated for bicycle use by signs only and may or may not include additional pavement width for cyclists. In the vicinity of the project site, bike lanes are provided on Airport Boulevazd, Oyster Point Boulevazd, and Sister Cities Boulevard. .rsTF. •n.. i1*,~ r .. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 III. SOUTH SAN FRANCisCO TDM ELEMENTS The City of South San Francisco requires that new projects achieve a goal of 35% alternative mode use. Table 1 presents the standazd base TDM measures for the City of South San Francisco and their estimated alternative mode use. Additional TDM measures are presented in Table 2. Table 1. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO -EAST OF ffiGHWAY 101 Standard Base TDM Re uirements Measure/ Pro am Developer Im lamented Developer as Tenant or Em to er Im laments Percent Miti ation Planning/Design Measures ~ 1.0% to 3.0% Buildin la out X Building setbacks X Building wiring X ~ Pass er loadin zones X Transit Desi Elements j 0.5% to 0.5% Street Desi X ~ Parlan Desi Measures ; 5.0% to 10.0% Preferential pazking 10% min. ~ c ool and van ool ~ X X ~ Pazking configuration X Pedestrian Measures 0.5% to 1.0% I~/finimi~p wain distance X Pedestrian/ trail connections X j Internal Pedestrian access ~ X Bi cle Desi Measures ~ 2.0% to 2.5% Showers/ Clothes lockers X X ~ Bicycle pazking (short + long term) i X Information Board /Kiosks ~ X X ! - `Transpoi~ation Coordinator i - ------- =-- - Y' 1 - .., . „s, ~ ., j `t 1.0% to 1.0%-~ ]m lamentation ~ X X - .l - l--- - CCRs _._...- -------- ____ ---- ------- j Designated employer contact in leases ~ each tenant X X ------------ X.___._.-_ -_._..~ X I , _Carpool Programs _- _ j _ ~ 2.0% to 2.0% ]Zidematching services X Vanpool Programs ~ 2.0% to 2.0% Ridematchin services X j Transit Programs Free trial rides -- - -----~ - 0.5% - X ~---~--- to --- 0.5% --- Transit riders 'de ~ X X Parking Programs Preferential azkin (registration, mgmt.)~ __ ' X ~-- X ~ -- _ Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Table 1. (cont.) CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO -EAST OF HIGHWAY 101 Standard Base TDM Re uirements Measure/ Pro m Developer Im lemented Developer as Tenant or Em to er Im lements ' Percent Miti ation .Pedestrian Programs _ _ (_0.5_% to 0.5°_/0_ ~~~ W Club /Mentor Grou X Bi cle Pro rams 1.0% to 1.0% ____B~cle riders guide _ _ ___ _ _ X X Ridematching services X Promotional Programs ~ 4.0% to 6.0% New Tenant and employee orientation packets X Flyers, posters, brochures, emails X X Transportation fairs X X Spare the Air (June -October) X X Rideshare Week (October) X X Newsletter articles X Trip planning assistance- routes and maps Kick-Off Event (at 50% occupancy) Guaranteed ride home X X X X X , Monitoring and Evaluation - Annual Report ---_.-_-_- X X Fines for noncompliance ~ X X __ _ Standard Base Range ~ 20.0% to 30.0% Note: Standard TDM Goal for all projects is 35%. Therefore, all projects will have to choose additional measures from the aggressive TDM list in order to achieve the 35% requirement. Source: City of South San Francisco Ho Com an Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 2I 7 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Table 2. CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISCO -EAST OF ffiGHR'AY 101 Additional TDM O tions/A essive Miti ation Measures Measure/ Pro am Developer Im lamented Developer as Tenant or Employer Im laments Percent Mi ' ation Transit Design Elements ~ 1.0% to 5.0% Land dedication for transit facilities X Transit passenger shelter/ bus stop X Bus/ rail station subsid (for construction X j Parlang Design Measures 5.0% to 5.0% Shared arkin w/ existin develo went X Reduced arkin on site X Off street arkin restrictions X Electric vehicle arkin char ' stations X Bicycle Design Measures I 2.0% to 2.0% Bic cle trail connections X { Onsite Amenities 1.5% to 5.0% Cafeteria with hot food services X j X j Valet services (dry cleaning) ATM ! X X Exercise facilities X X Convenience retail (sundries) X X Childcare ~ Post office/ stems X X X X Onsite transit ass sales X ( X Carpool Programs - ~ Mentor ou ~ X -_ X i 2.0% to 5.0% Alternative commute subsidies ~ X X Transportation Management Association Partici ation X ~ X ~ 1.0% to 3.0% Vanpool Programs --- -~-- { -~ - -~---~-- 2.0% to 5.0% --- --- ----_. ~ Mentor group X _ ~ X Alternative. commute subsidies _-_ j _ X ! - <;, ::.:X .., ~":.~j .--- . Transit Programs + 1.0% to 10.0% Transit subsidies X X r Onsite pass outlet Transit field tri s X X X Subscription bus services Shuttle programs (frequency and route j cover e j X X X X , I Increased frequency for offpeak hours j X X j Increased frequency for peak hours _ _ _ ~ Additional route coverage during peak j hours j X X X X { .. _ Fehr c~ Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Table 2. (cont.) CITY OF SOUTS SAN FRANCISCO -EAST OF ffiGHWAY 101 Additional TDM O tions/A essive Miti ation Measures Measure/Pro am Developer Im lemented Developer as Tenant or Employer Im lements Percent Miti ation Additional route coverage during midday eriod X X Parking Programs 5.0% to 10.0% Reduced parking fees for c ool/EV/van ools X X Paid offsite parking at park & ride lots / transit stations _ X X Paid azkin _ X X _ Offsite parking- pazk and ride shuttles X X Par ' cash out X Pedestrian Programs 2.0% to 5.0% Alternative commute subsidies X X Bicycle Programs ~ 0.5% to 5.0% Co limen bikes recreational use X ~ X Campus bikes Bi cle riders 'des X X X X Bicycle Club /Mentor Group X X Alternative commute subsidies X X Promotional Programs j 1.0% to 1.0% Van ool Week eli X X ~ Bike to Work Day (May) X X , Earth Da Aril X 1, X Telecommunicating Site amenities onl X ~ 1.0% to 2.0% Alternative Work Schedule i Site amenities onl X - A essive Ran a 25.0% to 63.0% Note: No one project is expected to achieve 63% TDM. This would require substantial subsidies for all alternative modes of transportation.It is more likely that a developer will provide financial incentives fqr a.siAgla mode such as.transit or bicycling. Source: City of South San Francisco ~. Ho Com an Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 IV. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan elements for 217 East Grand Avenue emphasize measures that aze parking-oriented, include on-site amenities that encourage the use of alternative modes of travel, and require participation in associations that promote commute alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle. This TDM Plan includes appropriate measures that will satisfy City of South San Francisco guidelines. Table 3 presents the TDM measures for the proposed. project. Each measure is described below. TDM Coordinator A transportation coordinator will be designated for the site. The coordinator will actively market the TDM Plan to all employees and will conduct the annual monitoring/reporting process. The coordinator will develop an on-site transportation information center with SamTrans, CalTrain, and BART schedules and maps. The coordinator will also conduct carpool or vanpool matching services. The transportation coordinator's role also includes managing Commuter Check distribution and the guaranteed ride-home program (working in conjunction with local taxi services or rental caz agencies). Other responsibilities may be added as the need arises. On-Site Amenities/Parkingbesign Measures On-site amenities will be provided to promote the use of alternative modes and to reduce employee reliance on the single-occupant automobile. On-site amenities include providing bicycle racks or storage lockers and preferential pazking spaces for carpools. Pazking spaces near building entrances will be designated as reserved carpool pazking with signage or pavement striping. Additionally, amenities are provided that promote the use of bicycles to travel to and .W,.,°~~ from~~e':~project site: The corporate.headqusrters at 2 CorporateDrive has ~thrPe sets of • ~°~ -~ ~~ showery "for employee use. The project sponsor also ~pr"oxides a $300 subsidy for membership to a health club, with one club being located in the vicinity of the project site. Employees that bicycle to work can utilize the showers at either the corporate headquarters or in the health club. Transit Programs CalTrain and BART shuttles provide service from the South San Francisco CalTrain station and Glen Park BART station to neazby developments in the Oyster Point and Gateway azeas. The Utah-Grand and Oyster Point Employer Shuttle and the Gateway Employer Shuttle both serve the CalTrain station and have stops in the vicinity of the project site. The BART Oyster Area Shuttle, the Gateway Area Shuttle, and the Utah- Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Grand Area Shuttle all have stops in the vicinity of the project site and connect the Glen Park station. The project sponsor also provides employees with Commuter Checks, allowing employees to purchase transit passes or reimburse parking expenses with pre-tax income. Guaranteed Ride Home Program One of the most-common reasons that employees do not want to use an alternative mode (i.e. carpool, vanpool, or transit) is the inability to leave work unexpectedly for a family emergency or the fear of being stranded if they need to work late. One element that alleviates these feazs is a Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program. With this program, employees can use a taxi service, rental car, or another selected mode to get home and the employer pays for the service. `his project will provide a GRH program that will be managed by the transportation coordinator. An employee who needs a ride home will contact the transportation coordinator. The transportation coordinator will then make the necessazy travel arrangements. Carpool Programs Carpools aze the most populaz alternative commute mode. An in-house ridematching service, in conjunction with a vigorous mazketing campaign, will be used to increase the percentage of employees that share a ride to work. Vanpool Programs An in-house ridematching service, in conjunction with a vigorous mazketing campaign, will be used to increase the percentage of employees that commute to work via a vanpool. Promotional Programs The project sponsor will provide information via flyers, posters, emails, or brochures ~:,~.:. regarding alternative mode use:~c.During new::empl~yee..orien~ation, .the project sponsor :r~:..- .h. •~~ ~- ~ •- will be showing the Congestion Relief Alliance video "The Better Way" in an effort to ~ •_~: ~> encourage use of public transportation and carpooling. Telecommunicating The project sponsor offers a program that allows employees to work from home a few days a week or on an as needed basis. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 Table 3. Transportation Demand Management Plan for 217 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco Percent Alternative TDM Measure Descri tion Mode IIse Bicycle racks/lockers The project sponsor will install bike racks or 2.0% to 2.5% bi cle lockers. Parking Design Measures The project sponsor shall provide preferential 5.0% to 10.0% arkin for c ool users. Transit Programs The project sponsor will fiord guaranteed seats 1.0% to 10.0% on a CalTrain and/or BART shuttle. In addition, Commuter Checks are provided to employees to purchase transit passes or reimburse arkin fees. Promotional Programs The project sponsor will provide promotional ! 4.0% to 6.0% programs. Promotion programs include: new ~ tenant & employee orientation packets; flyers, posters, email; transportation fairs; trip Tannin assistance; teed ride home. Participate in the Alliance's The project sponsor will fiord slots in the See Promotional anteed ride home ro am ro am. ~ Pro Carpool Programs The project sponsor will sponsor a carpool ' 2.0% to 2.0% ro that rovides ridematchin services. Vanpool Programs The project sponsor will sponsor a vanpool ~ 2.0% to 2.0% ro am that rovides ridematchin services. On-site Amenities The project sponsor provides three sets of ! 1.5% to 5% showers at the corporate office. In addition, the project sponsor currently subsidizes membership to a health club, one of which is located near the project site. Employees can use the showers at either the corporate office or at the health club. Transportation Coordinator The project sponsor will designate a TDM I 1.0% to 1.0% coordinator for the buildin . ~ _ Telecommunicating .. ; ~` ,:The project sponsor offers the opportunity to _i 1.0% to_ 2.0% ,, work from home. ~ _~ `'.~ _ " . Transportation Management ~~'I'he project sponsor will participate in a 1.0% to 3:0% Association Partici ation Trans ortation M ement Association. Total 20.5% to 43.5% Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 V. PARING DEMAND ANALYSIS The proposed conversion of the existing unoccupied wazehouse at 217 East Grand Avenue would create 18,000 squaze feet of general office space. A pazking analysis was performed to determine if the additional parking demand created by the new office space would be satisfied by the future on-site parking supply. The wazehouse at 217 East Grand Avenue is one of five buildings that shaze a common pazking lot containing 204 pazking spaces. The existing pazking lot configuration is shown in Figure 3. As part of this project, the pazking lot will be modified. At the southwest comer of the development, nine pazking spaces aze planned for construction. These new pazking spaces will replace nine pazking spaces to be removed just south of 217 East Grand Ave for development of various employee outdoor amenities. Therefore, although the parking lot configuration will undergo minor modification, a constant 204 pazking spcaes will remain available to the development. To accommodate circulation and parking space turnover in this particular parking configuration, the actual pazking supply is reduced by 10% to 184 stalls. 'This is the "effective" pazking supply under both existing and future conditions. A parking count was performed on Thursday, May 24, to determine the existing pazking demand at the development. On this day, 120 vehicles were parked at the development parking lot during the morning peak. Next, the additional parking demand resulting from the conversion of the wazehouse at 217 East Grand Avenue to office space was determined. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has developed parking rates for several different land uses based on surveys of actual parking demand. The land use most applicable to the Tularik Inc. site is for "General Office Building." The peak pazking rates recommended by ITE are shown in Table 4. Table 4. '~ ITE Parking Demand Rates `-~ For General Office Building - Land Peak Pazkin S aces Occu ied Use Per 1,000 s . ft. Per em to ee General Office Buildin 1 2.79 s aces 0.79 s aces 'rarKtngCieneratton, 1'"Edition, Land-use categories 711-716, ITE, 1987. Based on Tularik Inc.'s proposal to develop 18,000 sq. ft. of office space for 90 employees, the future parking demand generated by 217 East Grand Avenue was determined using the ITE parking rates. Because it is expected that at least 10 employees will telecommute and travel to the office site on alternating days, the parking demand will be based on an office site with 85 full-time equivalent employees. The future parking demand is shown in Table 5 using both published ITE parking rates as Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 21 ~ East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 independent variables. The future parking demand is found by multiplying the ITE parking rate by the appropriate office space characteristic (square footage or number of employees). As shown in Table 5, the ITE parking rates project that the development of 217 East Grand Avenue into office space would result in a parking demand of 50-67 parking spaces. Table 5. 217 East Grand Avenue Future Parking Demand Location Peak Parkin S aces Re aired Per 1,000 s . ft. Per em to ee 217 East Grand Avenue 50 s aces 67 s aces Table 6 shows the "effective" parking supply at the development versus the future parking demand. The future demand is determined by adding the existing parking demand to the parking demand generated by the conversion of 217 East Grand Avenue to office space. The table shows the total parking demand based on both ITE parking rates. As shown in Table 6, total parking demand for the development site after conversion of 217 East Grand Avenue to office space will range from 170-187 parking spaces. Table 6. Comparison of Existing and Future Parking Conditions "Effective" Parking Supply Pazking Demand % of "Effective" Parking Capacity Existin Conditions 184 s aces' 120 s aces2 65 Future Conditions - usin ITE s . ft. azkin rate 184 aces' 170 s aces3 92% - usin ITE em loyee arking rate 184 s aces' 187 s aces3 102% ' Based on a 10% reduction of actual parking supply to accommodate circulation and parking turnover. Z Data collected by Fehr & Peers Associates on Thursday, May 24, 2001. 'Future parking demand determined by adding future parking demand of 217 East Grand Avepue to existing c}evelopment demand. __ :.., , The TI'E published parking rates indicate that pazking demand gt~the development may exceed parking supply after 217 East Grand Avenue is converted to office space. Based on the ITE parking rate per employee, the future parking demand generated by 217 East Grand Avenue will exceed the "effective" pazking supply at the development by 3 vehicles. In this circumstance, the 3 vehicles could park on Roebling Street, where on- street pazking is available. However, based on the 1TE parking rate per office squaze footage, the future parking demand generated by 217 East Grand Avenue will be less than the "effective" parking supply at the development. In this circumstance, the parking demand is comfortably lower than the "effective" parking supply. Because ITE published two methods for determining parking demand, a range of parking demand is created for the development of 217 East Grand Avenue. The very high end of this parking demand range (170-187 spaces) predicts that parking supply (184 spaces) Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 couid be inadequate. However, because the parking supply falls at the high end of the parking demand range, it is likely that the parking supply at the development site will be adequate for the parking demand for the majority of days. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 217 East Grand Avenue Transportation Demand Management Plan June 2001 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This report presents the TDM Plan for the Tularik Inc. conversion of 217 East Grand Avenue from a warehouse to office space in South San Francisco, California. The report identifies TDM measures that contribute to a goal of 35% alternative mode use. According to the project sponsor, approximately 41 % of the workforce participates in carpooling, ridesharing, or public transportation. The TDM plan supplements the existing employee participation in alternative mode uses. The TDM Plan has been tailored to utilize the measures that are most compatible for the project: - The project is located in close proximity to the CalTrain Station, providing convenient access to CalTrain. The TDM Plan promotes transit usage by funding seats to a CalTrain or BART shuttle. ` - The building will have bicycle racks and designated carpool parking spaces. In addition, facilities are provided for. bicyclists to shower and dress. These physical attributes promote alternative commute options. - The project sponsor will participate in a TDM association. This will maximise the effectiveness of this TDM plan. The TDM plan meets the specific requirements set forth by the City of South San Francisco. The TDM Plan is projected to achieve a 20.5% to 43.5% alternative mode use according to draft City of South San Francisco guidelines. A parking analysis was performed to determine if the additional parking demand generated by the new office facility would be satisfied by the existing on-site parking supply. Using parking rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), the parking demand of the new office was determined. Based on this analysis, the parking supply"at the development should be adequate: for the'-parking demaird.on the majority of days. Occasionally, the parking demand may exceed the parking supply at the development. However, on-street parking on Roebling Street can supply any excess parking demand under these circumstances. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. ~~ m ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~.>a OQ'C OYSTER POINT BLVD P~~a ~ P~ Q ~~~ G~ ~ 101 ~ ., ~o~, Gy,~S aQy T~ ~G FORGES BLVD O ~ti 2 ~1 J~ OP ~, ~O ~P ~QS ~~ 3 ~„ ~ c~ O qVF ?~ ~ PROJECT m SITE o,~ ~~ N Not to Scale 217 East Grand Avenue TDM FEHRBcPEERSASSOCIATES,INC. PROJECT LOCATION - r Tmnsportation Consultants May, 2001 FIGURE 1 002411 ~° e~ ~~ ,~-, P~ OYSTER POINT BLVD • ~~ I ,~~ ~ PJ • I • 101 CalTrain / ~ CO,QA Q,6 o e~`~ moo`' Station • • ~ ~ r G ~~ ~ FORBES BLVD • • ~ ~ ° • '~ • ~ 2 ~~ ~ o Oyster Point a ttl ~ '~ Sh ..• Q e u ~ Tularik • Corporate a ~ Q' ~ ~ S` ~'~o ~o ~ v • Headquarters i < ~ c ~'o ~, e I ~ ~ '91 F f rr 3 t o PROJECT •'' '• ~ Q SITE ~ _ ~ Utah-Grand ~ and Gateway Shuttles • a ~o ~~ L O LEGEND: E -~-~ SamTrans Bus Route N ~~~ CalTrain /BART Shuttle Not to Scale 217 East Grand Avenue TDM FEHRB[PEERSASSOCIATES,i!NC. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM _ r Transportation Conndtants o2~;Z01 FIGURE 2 D Z m J a > w a ~ ~ N ~ N O W N Q Z O 'V V Z ~_ W 0 z~ ~ N F Q U `e ~ ~' e y a a z x w M W LL Gp~ ~y N ~Q pN ~ S