Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-21-25 Planning Commision Regular Meeting Agenda Packet with Speaker Cards and Public Comment
Thursday, August 21, 2025 7:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Library Parks & Recreation Building, Council Chambers 901 Civic Campus Way, South San Francisco, CA Planning Commission SARAH FUNES-OZTURK, Chairperson AYSHA PAMUKCU, Vice Chairperson JOHN BAKER, Commissioner MICHELE EVANS, Commissioner NORMAN FARIA, Commissioner SAM SHIHADEH, Commissioner ALEX TZANG, Commissioner Regular Meeting Agenda 1 August 21, 2025Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda How to observe the Meeting (no public comment): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26, Comcast, Channel 27, or AT&T, Channel 99 2) https://www.ssf.net/Government/Video-Streaming-City-and-Council-Meetings/Planning-Commission 3) https://www.youtube.com/@CityofSouthSanFrancisco/streams How to Submit written Public Comment before the meeting: Email: PCcomments@ssf.net Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting. The email will be monitored during the meeting.The City encourages the submission of comments by 6:00pm on the date of the Public Hearing to facilitate inclusion in the meeting record. Written comments received prior to 6:00pm on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record, but will not be read aloud at the meeting. How to provide Public Comment during the meeting: COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER During a meeting, comments can only be made in person: Complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chambers. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. American Disability Act: The City Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americanswith Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to City Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at all-cc@ssf.net. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at all-cc@ssf.net, 72-hours before the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/18/2025 2 August 21, 2025Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak on any item not listed on the Agenda, and on any items listed under the Consent Calendar. Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is written on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. Written comments received prior to 6:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record, but will not be read aloud. DISCLOSURE OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for Planning Commissioners to disclose any communications, including site visits, they have had on current agenda items, or any conflict of interest regarding current agenda items. CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration and approval of minutes from the August 7, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. 1. 08-07-25 PC Draft MinutesAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING Report regarding consideration and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Zoning Text Amendment to make minor revisions to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to building height, consideration of a Variance, and Design Review for the redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club facility at 201 West Orange Avenue in the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the SSFMC, and determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that the project is categorically exempt as an Infill Development Project. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332.) (Adena Friedman, Chief Planner) 2. Attach 1 DRB Comment Letter Attach 2 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Attachments: Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/18/2025 3 August 21, 2025Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Resolution making findings and a determination that the Peninsula Boys and Girls Club Orange Park Clubhouse Project located at 201 West Orange Avenue qualifies for a categorical exemption, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332, Infill Development. 2a. Exhibit A CEQA Checklist Exhibit B CEQA Document Appendices Attachments: Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to building height and recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Variance, and Design Review for the redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club facility at 201 West Orange Avenue in the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District. 2b. Exhibit A COAs Exhibit B Plan Set Exhibit C Variance Justification Exhibit D Draft Ordinance Attachments: Report regarding a proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for a period of ten (10) years in exchange for payment of Community Benefits Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. (Billy Gross, Principal Planner) 3. Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve a proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for a period of ten (10) years in exchange for payment of Community Benefit Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 3a. Exhibit A - 180 ECR Development AgreementAttachments: Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/18/2025 4 August 21, 2025Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda The Commission has adopted a policy that applicants and their representatives have a maximum time limit of 20 minutes to make a presentation on their project. Non-applicants may speak a maximum of 3 minutes on any agenda item. Questions from Commissioners to applicants or non-applicants may be answered by using additional time. ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT **Any interested party will have 15 calendar days from the date of an action or decision taken by the Planning Commission to appeal that action or decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk as provided under Chapter 20.570 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. In the event an appeal period ends on a Saturday, Sunday, or any other day the City is closed, the appeal period shall end at the close of business on the next consecutive business day. The cost to appeal for applicants, residents, and all others is as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/18/2025 5 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-879 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:1. Consideration and approval of minutes from the August 7, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™6 August 7, 2025 Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES AUGUST 7, 2025 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TIME: 7:00 PM AGENDA REVIEW No changes ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM STAFF None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None CONSENT CALENDAR – Voting Key: (yes, no, abstain) 1. Consideration and approval of minutes from the July 17, 2025 Planning Commission Motion to approve: Commissioner Faria Second – Commissioner Tzang, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission 08-07-25 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Report regarding consideration of an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an indoor volleyball and pickleball facility (Bay Area Sport House) at 147 Beacon Street in Business Technology Park-High (BTP-H) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) and determination that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS PRESENT: Chair Funes-Ozturk, Commissioners: Baker, Faria, Evans, Shihadeh, Tzang ABSENT: Vice Chair Pamukcu STAFF PRESENT: Billy Gross – Principal Planner , Kimia Mahallati – City Attorney, Stephanie Skangos – Senior Planner, Victoria Kim – Associate Planner 7 August 7, 2025 Minutes Page 2 of 3 (CEQA), per Class 1, Section 15301, Existing Facilities. (Victoria Kim, Associate Planner) Public Hearing Opened 7:04pm Public Hearing Closed 7:25pm Motion to approve: Commissioner Faria Second – Commissioner Baker, approved by roll call (6-0-0) Meeting Video: Planning Commission 08-07-25 ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 3. Report regarding an application for Design Review to construct a new multifamily residential structure consisting of four dwelling units at 227 Armour Avenue in the Downtown Residential High (DRH) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), and determination that the project is categorically exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Class 3, Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (Stephanie Skangos, Senior Planner) Motion to approve: Commissioner Faria, Second – Commissioner Tzang, approved by roll call (5-0-1) Commissioner Shihadeh recused himself from the proceedings prior to discussion of this item and abstained from voting due to a potential conflict of interest from having a business interest within 1,000 feet of the location of the proposed project. Meeting Video: Planning Commission 08-07-25 ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION None ADJOURNMENT Chair Funes-Ozturk adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7:43 PM. Adena Friedman, Chief Planner Sarah Funes-Ozturk , Chairperson or Aysha Pamukcu, Vice Chairperson Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Commission City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco AF/af 8 August 7, 2025 Minutes Page 3 of 3 9 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. Report regarding consideration and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Zoning Text Amendment to make minor revisions to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC)Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to building height,consideration of a Variance,and Design Review for the redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club facility at 201 West Orange Avenue in the Parks and Recreation (PR)Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the SSFMC,and determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)that the project is categorically exempt as an Infill Development Project.(CEQA Guidelines Section 15332.)(Adena Friedman, Chief Planner) MOTIONS FOR THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1.Move to adopt a resolution determining the project is exempt from CEQA. 2.Move to adopt a resolution recommending adoption of a Zoning Text Amendment and approval of project entitlements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and take the following actions: 1.Move to adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that City Council find that the project qualifies for a categorical exemption,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Guidelines Section 15332,In-Fill Development Projects,and does not require further environmental analysis; and 2.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance (ZA25-0002)and recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Planning Project (P24-0102)including a Variance (VAR25-0002)and Design Review (DR24-0030), subject to the attached draft Conditions of Approval. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND Project Description The Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (BGCP),represented by Hunter Properties (together,the Project Applicant),is proposing to redevelop the existing Orange Park Clubhouse,located at 201 West Orange Avenue. BGCP is a not-for-profit organization that partners with local schools to provide free,high-quality after-school and summer programs for students from kindergarten through high school.BGCP provides programming at the Orange Park Clubhouse six days a week (Monday - Saturday). The existing Orange Park Clubhouse was constructed in 1961 and consists of a three-building campus: Building 1 is a single-story academic building and Clubhouse main entry and lobby,Building 2 is a high-bay gymnasium with a small two-story classroom,office,and storage space,and Building 3 is a small single-story City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 10 powered by Legistar™10 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. gymnasium with a small two-story classroom,office,and storage space,and Building 3 is a small single-story structure used primarily for storage.The current facility is approximately 21,300 square feet (sq.ft.)and serves approximately 200 students, from kindergarten through eighth grade. The BGCP is proposing to improve and expand the current facility,including expanding programming to high school students.The project proposes to demolish the existing Buildings 1 and 3,to be replaced with new two- story wood-framed buildings,with slightly larger footprints than the current buildings.Building 2 (the Gymnasium)will remain,and BGCP is proposing cosmetic improvements.Both new buildings would be connected internally to the Gymnasium.The project also includes site improvements such as parking lot re- striping,widening the perimeter concrete walkway,accessibility improvements,utility and infrastructure improvements,and landscaping improvements.A new trash enclosure is proposed to the west of Building 3. The new project square footage is 38,890,and the new facility would serve an additional 150 students,for a total of 300 students.The applicant has entered into a lease agreement with the City to lease the West Orange Library site during construction,to ensure that uninterrupted BGCP services and programming will continue for children and families. Site Overview The project site is an approximately three-acre site located at 201 West Orange Avenue,including a 2.75-acre portion of APN 093-331-110,and the .25-acre APN 093-331-150.The BGCP leases the Orange Park Clubhouse from the City of South San Francisco,which owns the properties,as well as the other properties comprising Orange Memorial Park.The project site is adjacent to Orange Memorial Park,across Memorial Drive and Centennial Way Trail.Single-family homes on C Street are located adjacent to the project site to the southwest,and a church is located next to the project site on West Orange Avenue.Los Cerritos Elementary School is located directly across West Orange Avenue from the Clubhouse.The site is accessed via a two-way drive-aisle from West Orange Avenue,with parking located in front of the Clubhouse,and also in the north and west portions of the site. Parking is shared between the Clubhouse and Orange Memorial Park. Architectural Design As illustrated in the project Plan Set (Associated Entitlements Resolution,Exhibit B),the existing single-story Buildings 1 and 3 are proposed to be replaced with two-story buildings,with a maximum height of 30’(plus an additional 6’for mechanical screening).The primary finishes of the new building will be grey and off-white plaster walls,with copper,bronze,and black painted panels and dual-glazed clear glass storefront window systems.The gymnasium (Building 2)will be repainted,and improvements may include window and skylight replacement, and new roofing. Landscape Improvements The proposed landscape plan is designed to enhance the experience for the children attending programs at the Clubhouse,be compatible with the nearby Orange Memorial Park,and create a buffer for adjacent land uses. The east side of the site adjacent to West Orange Avenue will include new planted areas and a new outdoor cafeteria space with artificial turf and raised planter beds.New trees and a six-foot tall wooden fence are also proposed along the rear lot line (southern edge of the site),adjacent to the neighboring church and residential uses on C Street.A screening hedge will be located between Building 3 and the trash enclosure,at the western City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 10 powered by Legistar™11 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. uses on C Street.A screening hedge will be located between Building 3 and the trash enclosure,at the western side of the site.All planted areas are designed to be low water use and will be compliant with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO). Circulation and Parking Vehicle access to the project site is via a two-way drive from West Orange Avenue (proposed site circulation is illustrated in the Exhibit B,Plan Set,Sheet A1.40,in the associated Entitlements Resolution).When dropping off or picking up students in cars,parents or caregivers will enter the parking lot,drive to the end of the drive aisle,loop around at the end of the parking lot,and drop students off at the building entrances.This will ensure that students being picked up or dropped off do not have to cross traffic to access the building. The site’s location adjacent to the Centennial Way Trail makes it easily accessible to cyclists and pedestrians,as well as cars.The circulation plan illustrates the new paved accessible pedestrian path that will be provided from West Orange Avenue. The path will provide direct pedestrian access to all the building entrances. There are 108 parking spaces located on the project site currently.These are shared parking spaces,used by the BGCP as well as visitors to Orange Memorial Park.The project includes realigning and re-striping the parking spaces adjacent to the building,to meet the project needs.This will provide 41 parking spaces in front of the buildings,with a small parking area located west of Building 3,for van parking.All parking areas will meet all accessibility and electric vehicle (EV)parking requirements and will include two ADA-accessible parking spaces (one van,and one standard size),two EV spaces (including one ADA-accessible space),and six parking spaces for future EV parking. In addition to the spaces serving the BGCP,the project will also re-stripe all of the parking within the site,in order to establish a clear circulation route for student pick-up and drop-off and improve site efficiency.There total parking within the site proposed as part of the redevelopment project will be 106 spaces (two fewer spaces than are currently on-site).In addition to vehicle parking,the BGCP project will provide 12 short-term bike parking spaces, and six long-term bike parking spaces at the main entrances and lobbies of Buildings 1 and 3. Entitlements Request The Project is seeking the following entitlements, discussed in detail in this staff report: •CEQA Determination •Design Review •Variance for reduced rear setback •Zoning Text Amendment, to allow additional height for mechanical equipment in the Civic Districts ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Existing and Proposed Use The BGCP project site is located in the Parks and Recreation (PR)Zoning District.The PR District is reserved for parks and recreation facilities,including parks,public golf courses,and greenways.The BGCP is a unique use,and it mostly closely resembles two distinct land uses:Indoor Sports and Recreation,and Daycare Facility, both of which are permitted land uses in this district.The Project’s gymnasium fits the definition of indoor City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 10 powered by Legistar™12 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. both of which are permitted land uses in this district.The Project’s gymnasium fits the definition of indoor sports and recreation facility,and the after-school programming that the BGCP provides falls within the category of a daycare facility as it is non-school programming for children and provides care for children outside of the normal school day.The land uses will remain the same,following the project redevelopment and expansion of the facility. Park and Recreation District Development Standards SSFMC Section 20.110 (Civic Districts)contains development standards for the PR Zoning District.The proposed project meets the development standards,with two exceptions,the rear setback and the maximum building height, discussed in detail below. Rear Setback - Variance Request The required rear setback in the PR district is zero,or ten feet when abutting a residential district.Since the project site abuts a residential district (RM-22,to the south of the site),the applicable rear setback is ten feet. Currently,Buildings 1 and 2 are built to the property line at the rear setback.The existing setback for Building 3 is 16 feet (meeting the setback requirement). Buildings 1 and 3 are proposed to be demolished and redeveloped.The proposed setback for Building 1 is five feet (which does not meet the setback requirement of ten feet),and the proposed setback for Building 3 is 11 eleven feet (meeting the setback requirement).Building 2 is remaining,with only minor exterior changes.If Building 1 were proposed to be redeveloped as an exact replacement (same footprint,square footage,and single -story),the new building would be permitted to be rebuilt in the same location,with the non-conforming setback.However,since Building 1 is being proposed as a larger,two-story building,it must meet setback requirements. The applicant has applied for a variance for the reduction in the rear yard setback.Per SSFMC Section 20.500.001 (Variances -Purpose),approval of a variance is intended to provide a mechanism for relief from the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance,where strict application will deprive the project of privileges enjoyed by similar properties, because of the subject property’s unique and special conditions. The approving body must be able to make the following findings to approve a variance (SSFMC Section 20.500.004 - Variances, Required Findings): ·There are special circumstances applicable to the property,including its size,shape,topography, location, or surroundings ·Such unique circumstances were not created by the owner or applicants ·The variance does not constitute a special privilege granted to the recipient,inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone where the property is located ·The authorization of the variance will substantially meet the intent and purpose of the zoning district in which the subject property is located and will not be materially detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or the public welfare in general ·The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 4 of 10 powered by Legistar™13 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. ·The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City’s adopted environmental review guidelines To support the variance request,the BGCP has submitted a Justification of Variance Findings (Associated Entitlements Resolution -Exhibit C),which includes a written justification and a graphic that illustrates the site constraints.The justification includes a description of the special circumstances,which would make strict application of the Zoning Ordinance detrimental to the use of the property for a modernized Clubhouse facility. Specific site constraints include a PG&E easement,the BART tunnel,the BART zone of influence,and the trapezoidal shape of the parcel,which all limit the developable portions of the property.These site constraints were not created by the applicant;they are pre-existing conditions that have been in place for many years,long before the BGCP leased the property and operated the Clubhouse. The front of Building 1 is not able to extend any further beyond the current building footprint,as it would require the parking area to be extended into the BART tunnel parcel,which BART does not permit.It would also extend into the PG&E easement,and the terms of the easement do not permit any new utilities to run within or cross the easement.While the required rear setback is ten feet,the applicant is proposing a five-foot setback for Building 1.Currently,there is zero setback,so while a five-foot setback does not meet code requirements,it is more conforming than the current setback.The project includes a landscape buffer between the building and the property line,as well as a six-foot fence at the property line.Staff supports the variance request,as the strict interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance would not allow for the expanded BGCP Clubhouse use,which is needed to serve children and families in a modernized facility and expanded programs to high school students. Building Height for Mechanical Screening Per SSFMC Section 20.110.003 (Development Standards -Civic Districts),the maximum building height in the PR district is 30’.The Zoning Ordinance contains direction for measuring building height (SSFMC Section 20.040.005, Rules of Measurement): Building height is measured from the average level of the highest and lowest point of that portion of the lot covered by the building to the highest point on the roof or the top of the parapet wall or mechanical equipment screening wall. Additionally,equipment screening is also subject to the requirements of SSFMC Section 20.300.012 (B) (Screening of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment): All exterior mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened or incorporated into the design of buildings so as not to be visible from the public right-of-way or public open spaces.Equipment to be screened includes,but is not limited to,all roof-mounted equipment,air conditioners,heaters,utility meters,cable equipment,satellite dishes,telephone entry boxes,backflow preventions,irrigation control valves,electrical transformers,pull boxes,and all ducting for air conditioning heating,and blower systems.Screening materials shall be either dense landscaping or constructed of materials that are City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 5 of 10 powered by Legistar™14 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. consistent with the exterior colors and materials of the building. During the review of the BGCP project,staff determined that a maximum building height of 30’does not allow for a two-story,modernized building,as roof-mounted equipment (such as for heating and air conditioning units)would exceed this height requirement.The standard floor-to-ceiling height for this type of new construction is 14’-15’,thus building height for a two-story building without roof-mounted equipment would already reach 30’(and not allow for any roof-mounted equipment).The height of the proposed BGCP project is 30’to the top of the parapet;however,the required mechanical equipment screen reaches a height of 35’(existing and proposed building heights are illustrated in the Associated Entitlements Resolution,Plan Set, Exhibit B). The entitlements for this project include a request for a Zoning Text Amendment that would allow for a moderate height exception for equipment screening,for buildings of a 30’height or less within the Civic Districts.This exception would be subject to Design Review,and any project seeking this exception would also be required to meet the screening requirements outlined above. The proposed amendment would add a footnote to SSFMC Table 20.110.003:Development Standards -Civic Districts, as follows: Table 20.110.003: Development Standards - Civic Districts Standard PQP S PR OS Key Max. Main Building (ft/stories)1 30 ft; 80 ft between El Camino Real and Mission 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 1.For buildings 30 feet or less:an additional 5 feet,or 20%of the height of the building,whichever is greater, is permitted for equipment screening, subject to Design Review Approval. As proposed,the BGCP project would meet the requirements of this amendment,as the height of the equipment screening is 35’,and was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Design Review Board.Staff supports this amendment,as it allows for the construction or modernization of two-story buildings in the Civic District, which support public and semi-public uses throughout the City. Parking Vehicle Parking SSFMC Section 20.300.004 (Required Parking Spaces)provides parking space requirements for each land use type.BGCP is a unique use,with unique parking requirements.Building 1 will serve K-8 students and will function similarly to a Day Care Center in terms of parking requirements.SSFMC Section 20.300.004 requires a maximum of one space /employee for Day Care Centers,as well as a pick-up and drop-off plan.There are currently approximately fifteen staff members providing K-8 programming,and this number will remain the same.Thus,a maximum of fifteen parking spaces are needed to serve the K-8 staff.The pick-up and drop-off plan is illustrated on the Plan Set;parents and caregivers access the existing drive aisle at West Orange Avenue and make a circular loop through the parking lot to pick up K-8 grade students in front of the new Building 1,City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 6 of 10 powered by Legistar™15 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. and make a circular loop through the parking lot to pick up K-8 grade students in front of the new Building 1, and exit back out onto West Orange Avenue. Building 2 is proposed as a teen center,and the parking requirements will be more similar to a high school, since some of the students will be able to drive themselves.SSFMC does not include a specific parking requirement for a school,but instead requires a Parking Management and Monitoring Plan,including a parking needs analysis.The BGCP CEQA Analysis (Associated CEQA Resolution,Exhibit A)includes a parking analysis which states per Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)parking rates,high schools generate a total parking demand ranging between 0.16 and 0.32 parking spaces per student,depending on whether its location is in an urban or suburban location.This range accounts for the total parking demand,including teachers,staff and students.Since the BGCP is in an urban location,is close to the high schools it serves,and is well-served by public transit,bicycle,and pedestrian facilities,the parking demand would be at the low end of the parking range,and the appropriate parking demand is .16 spaces /student.In this case,with a high school population of 150 students,the parking demand for the teen center would be 24 parking spaces.Altogether,the maximum parking demand for the redeveloped BGCP will be 39 spaces, and 41 spaces are provided on-site for this use. As previously mentioned,the larger site will include 106 spaces,and parking is shared between BGCP and Orange Memorial Park.If all spaces at the BCGP are in use,BGCP visitors may park in the larger Orange Memorial Park parking areas,and visitors to Orange Memorial Park are also able to park in BGCP parking spaces during times when the BGCP facility is not being used,including evenings and weekends.The proposed parking on-site is sufficient to serve the BGCP redevelopment, without overparking the site. Bicycle Parking SSFMC Section 20.330.007 (Bicycle Parking)requires short-term bicycle parking spaces at the rate of five percent of total required or provided parking spaces (whichever is higher),with a minimum of four short-term bicycle spaces.BGCP is proposing 12 short-term bicycle spaces,significantly exceeding the minimum requirement (which would be four short-term spaces).Four short-term bicycle spaces are located at the entrance to Building 1,and eight short-term bicycle spaces are located at the entrance to Building 3.As indicated on the Plan Set,the short-term bicycle spaces are designed to meet Zoning Ordinance requirements in terms of location, anchoring and security, and size and accessibility. Long-term bicycle parking spaces are also required at a rate equivalent to at least five percent of required or maximum permitted vehicular spaces,as applicable.In this case,five percent of 41 parking spaces would be two parking spaces.BGCP is proposing six long-term parking spaces,exceeding the minimum requirement. The long-term bicycle parking spaces are located inside the entrances to Buildings 1 and 3,and will meet Zoning Ordinance standards for location,covered spaces,security,and size and accessibility.The proposed long-and short-term bicycle parking will encourage students and staff to ride their bicycles to the facility and take advantage of the location near the Centennial Way Trail. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The General Plan land use designation for the BGCP project site is Parks and Recreation.The purpose of this designation is parks,recreation complexes,public golf courses,and greenways.The BGCP project is consistent City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 7 of 10 powered by Legistar™16 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. designation is parks,recreation complexes,public golf courses,and greenways.The BGCP project is consistent with this designation,as it provides recreational opportunities for children,within a park setting,and is consistent with the following General Plan policy direction: ·GOAL PR-1:South San Francisco equitably provides improved parkland,recreational facilities,and services for all residents. ·Policy PR-9.6:Partner with San Mateo County and other organizations to provide quality childcare and preschool services.Partner with San Mateo County and other local and regional organizations to provide high-quality childcare and preschool services to South San Francisco residents and workers. ·Policy ECS-5.1:Develop partnerships for education.Develop formalized partnerships with local businesses and non-profit organizations to support South San Francisco Unified School District students, particularly disadvantaged communities identified in the Community Health and Environmental Justice Element and underserved groups. ·Policy ECS-5.2:Provide a variety of youth programming.Provide a variety of programming to ensure all children and youth in South San Francisco have educational and recreational opportunities,particularly disadvantaged communities as identified in the Community Health and Environmental Justice Element and underserved groups. DESIGN REVIEW The Design Review Board reviewed the BGCP project at its meeting in March,2025.The Board supported the project,and recommended approval to the Planning Commission (DRB letter is Attachment 1 to this staff report).The Board had several comments regarding landscaping,screening,and EV parking.The applicant addressed the DRB comments in a subsequent submittal,reflected in the current Plan Set.As proposed,the project meets the required findings for Design Review. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The BGCP hosted a neighborhood meeting on May 13,2025 at the current facility.Approximately 30 people attended,including neighbors and community members whose children attend programs at the facility.The BGCP presented the vision for the project,and answered questions about programming,construction,and project timeline. A summary of the meeting is attached to this staff report (Attachment 2). CEQA ANALYSIS Public Resources Code Section 21159.21 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 through 15333 include a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant impact on the environment and are therefore exempt from further CEQA review.CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 identifies Class 32 categorical exemptions for projects characterized as infill development.This exemption is intended to promote infill development within urbanized areas. A project can qualify for the Class 32 Infill Development categorical exemption if the following criteria can be met: ·The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 8 of 10 powered by Legistar™17 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. ·The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. ·The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. ·Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality. ·The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The applicant submitted an Infill Checklist and evaluation against the above criteria for City review (Associated CEQA Resolution,Exhibit A).The Checklist includes the following supporting technical analyses included as Appendices (Associated CEQA Resolution, Exhibit B): ·Appendix A: CalEEMod Construction-Period Emissions Calculations ·Appendix B: Geotechnical Investigation ·Appendix C: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment ·Appendix D: Historic Resource Evaluation Based on the checklist,the Project is determined to be categorically exempt under Class 32 as an Infill Development Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332.The Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan goals and policies and Zoning standards and requirements;is located on a site of less than five acres surrounded by developed urban uses that can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services and that does not provide sensitive habitat for endangered,rare or threatened species;and will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality or water quality.Thus,the Project qualifies as categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332,Class 32,Infill Development Project, no exceptions to that exemption apply, and no new or additional environmental document is required. CONCLUSION Redevelopment of the existing Boys and Girls Club will provide an updated, modernized facility for the South San Francisco community, and will enable expanded services and programming to a wider range of students. The proposed project is designed to be compatible with the location adjacent to Orange Memorial Park, with improved accessibility, landscaping, and parking and circulation areas. The proposal is consistent with General Plan goals and policies and Zoning Ordinance requirements and standards, with minor amendments. For these reasons, staff recommend that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council make a determination that the Project is categorically exempt under the provisions of CEQA, Section 15332, Infill Development; and 2.Adopt a resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to building height and recommending that the City City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 9 of 10 powered by Legistar™18 File #:25-826 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2. Council adopt a resolution approving a Variance, and Design Review for the redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club facility at 201 West Orange Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1.Design Review Board Letter 2.Neighborhood Meeting Summary Exhibits to Associated CEQA Resolution (Legistar File 25-827) a.Infill Checklist b.Infill Checklist Appendices a.BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions b.Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site c.Phase 1 Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment d.Historic Resources Evaluation Exhibits to Associated Entitlements Resolution (Legistar File 25-829) a.Conditions of Approval b.Project Plan Set c.Variance Justification d.Draft Zoning Text Amendment Ordinance City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 10 of 10 powered by Legistar™19 20 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Meeting Time: 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm Meeting Location: Orange Park Clubhouse | 201 W Orange Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Agenda: 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Project Overview a. BCCP Mission and Vision b. Clubhouse Rebuild: The Why/The Need/Current State/Challenges c. Project Vision d. Renders/Walkthrough e. Schedule/Timeline f. Continuity of Service 3. Q&A Attendance: Approximately 30 attendees Presenters: James Harris, Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula (BGCP), Applicant Jenny Obiaya, Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula (BGCP), Applicant Eddie Flores, Mayor, City of South San Francisco Adena Friedman, Chief Planner, City of South San Francisco Deke Hunter, Hunter Properties, Project Team Michelle Ney, Devcon Construction, Project Team Jorge Huerta-Azpeitia, Devcon Construction, Project Team Meeting Notes: The meeting commenced at approximately 6:15 PM, with refreshments provided. Jenny and James from the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGCP) opened the session with an overview of the organization and its services, emphasizing the scope and importance of local offerings. BGCP shared their intention to partner with the City of SSF beginning this fall, and host BGCP programs at the former Orange Park Library located at 840 West Orange Ave during the 2 year construction project. 21 Michelle and Deke followed with a presentation on the building design. They highlighted that the facility is specifically designed to support BGCP’s programs and community needs. The team also outlined the project timeline and assured attendees that BGCP services would continue during construction, temporarily relocating to the local library. Mayor Eddie Flores supported communication efforts by translating key information for Spanish-speaking participants, ensuring inclusive engagement. The project was met with unanimous community support. A few attendees inquired whether the services would be maintained at the current level or improved. The project team confirmed that services would, at minimum, remain consistent throughout and after construction. The meeting concluded around 7:00 PM. 22 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-827 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2a. Resolution making findings and a determination that the Peninsula Boys and Girls Club Orange Park Clubhouse Project located at 201 West Orange Avenue qualifies for a categorical exemption,pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332, Infill Development. WHEREAS,Hunter Properties,representing the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (“applicant”)has proposed the redevelopment of the existing Orange Avenue Clubhouse with the demolition and redevelopment of two new buildings to serve a larger population of students,exterior modifications of the existing gymnasium, landscaping and circulation improvements on the property located at 201 West Orange Avenue (APNs 093-331- 110 and 093-331-150 of approximately three acres (referred to as “Project Site”) in the City; and WHEREAS,the proposed Project is located within the Parks and Recreation (PR)Zoning District and Parks and Recreation General Plan Land Use Designation; and WHEREAS,the applicant seeks entitlement approval of a Planning Project (P24-0102),including Design Review (DR24-0030), Variance (VAR25-0002), and Zoning Text Amendment (ZA25-0002) for the Project; and WHEREAS,approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project”for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS,the City,in conjunction with an environmental consultant,Lamphier-Gregory,prepared an Infill Checklist and technical analyses to provide substantial evidence that the proposed Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under the provision of CEQA,Class 32,Section 15332 as an Infill Development Project; and WHEREAS,on August 21,2025,the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Infill Checklist,attached hereto as Exhibit A,and take public testimony; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has exercised its independent judgement and analysis,and considered all reports, recommendations, and testimony before making a determination on the Project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it,which includes without limitation,the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the South San Francisco 2040 General Plan;the South San Francisco Municipal Code;the 2040 General Plan Program EIR and Statement of Overriding Considerations;the Project applications;the project plan set prepared by Devcon City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™23 File #:25-827 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2a. and Statement of Overriding Considerations;the Project applications;the project plan set prepared by Devcon Construction Incorporated dated June 12,2025;Project Infill Checklist,including all appendices thereto, prepared by Lamphier-Gregory,dated June 2025;all site plans;all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed August 21,2025 public hearing;and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e)and §21082.2),the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS A. General Findings 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2.The Exhibits attached to this Resolution,including the Boys and Girls Club Orange Park Clubhouse Project Infill Checklist (Exhibit A)and its Appendices (Exhibit B),are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution, as if set forth fully herein. 3.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner. B. CEQA Findings 1.For the reasons stated in this Resolution,the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332: Class 32 as an Infill Development project because: a.As described in the record,the Project is designed to be consistent with the City’s General Plan, all applicable General Plan policies and zoning designations and regulations. b.The Project will be located within the City’s limits,on a site of less than five acres and will be surrounded by urban uses in a built-out environment. c.The Project Site has no value as a habitat for endangered,rare,or threatened species,as it is in a built-out environment and is currently disturbed as the site of existing buildings and parking lot. d.As supported by the findings of the Infill Checklist and technical analyses,approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality. e.The Project can be adequately serviced by all required utilities and public services. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™24 File #:25-827 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2a. SECTION 2 DETERMINATION NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the findings contained in this Resolution and a determination that the proposed Project qualifies for a categorical exemption, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. * * * * * * * City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™25 Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula Orange Park Clubhouse Project CEQA Analysis June 2025 Prepared for: City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA Prepared By: Lamphier–Gregory 26 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page i Table of Contents Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, Orange Park Clubhouse - CEQA Analysis Project Information ................................................................................................................................ 1 I Introduction and Executive Summary..................................................................................................... 2 II Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 4 III Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning ........................................................................... 19 IV Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption General Plan and Zoning Consistency ............................................................................................. 27 Site Location Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 28 Habitat for Endangered, Rare or Threatened Species ..................................................................... 28 Transportation ................................................................................................................................ 29 Noise ............................................................................................................................................... 32 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Water Quality .................................................................................................................................. 38 Utilities and Public Services ............................................................................................................ 41 V Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption Location ........................................................................................................................................... 43 Cumulative Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 44 Unusual Circumstances .................................................................................................................... 45 Damage to Scenic Resources ........................................................................................................... 48 Section 65962.5 of the Government Code (i.e., Cortese List) ......................................................... 48 Historic Resources ............................................................................................................................ 49 List of Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 53 List of Tables Table 1 Existing vs Proposed Building SF and FAR ............................................................................... 19 Table 2 Project’s Consistency with PR Zoning Standards .................................................................... 23 Table 3 Regional Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions during Construction ............................................... 37 List of Figures Figure 1 Orange Park Subarea ................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 Project Site and Adjacent Land Uses ......................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 Existing Site Improvements, Orange Park Clubhouse ............................................................... 8 Figure 4 New Building 1 Floor Plans ...................................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 New Building 1 Rendering ....................................................................................................... 12 Figure 6 New Building 3 Floor Plans ...................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7 New Building 3 Rendering ....................................................................................................... 14 Figure 8 Landscape Plans ...................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 9 General Plan Land Use Designations ...................................................................................... 20 Figure 10 SSF Zoning Districts ................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 11 Proposed Building Setbacks .................................................................................................... 24 Figure 12 Project’s Proximity to Schools and Transit .............................................................................. 31 Figure 13 Site Circulation Plan ................................................................................................................ 34 27 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page ii Figure 14 Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan ........................................................................... 42 Figure 15 Project in Relation to BART Tunnel and Zone of Influence ..................................................... 47 Attachments and Appendices Appendix A Lamphier-Gregory, CalEEMod Construction-Period Emissions Calculations, April 2025 Appendix B Langan Engineers, Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site, March 21, 2025 Appendix C AST Inc. Geotechnical, Phase I ESA for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, February 2025 Appendix D Preservation Architecture, Boys and Girls Club at 201 W. Orange Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation, February 18, 2024 28 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 1 Project Information 1.Project Title: 2.Lead Agency Name and Address: 3.Case Planner: 4.Project Location: 5.Owner: 6.Project Sponsor: Orange Park Clubhouse Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula City of South San Francisco Planning Division 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Adena Friedman, Chief Planer adena.friedman@ssf.net An approximately 3-acre site that includes two Assessors Parcels (a 2.75- acre portion of APN 093-331-110, and the 0.25-acre APN 093-331-150), with a primary address at: 201 West Orange Avenue South San Francisco, California Property Owner: City of South San Francisco Current Buildings leased by Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula Represented by: Derek K. Hunter, Hunter Properties deke@hunterproperties.com 6. Existing General Plan Designation: Parks and Recreation 7.Existing Zoning:Parks and Recreation (PR) 8.Requested Permits:Design Review Permit Variance for development standards for interior side yard setback in the PR zone The Project will also require subsequent administrative permits for demolition, grading, stormwater control and building permits 29 I - Introduction BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 2 I - Introduction Executive Summary The purpose of this document is to provide the required California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for the Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula’s proposed redevelopment of the Orange Park Clubhouse (i.e., the Project). This document includes: • A description of the proposed Project • An assessment of whether the Project qualifies for a CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 as an Infill Development Project • An examination of whether there are Project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the Project or its site and that would pose an exception to a CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 • An assessment of whether the Project qualifies for CEQA streamlining and exemptions pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as a project that is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified Applicable CEQA sections are further described below, each of which separately and independently provides a basis for CEQA compliance. Project Overview The Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, and their representatives at Hunter properties (together, the Project applicant) wish to redevelop their existing Orange Park Clubhouse. The Clubhouse is located on an approximately 3-acre site leased from the City of South San Francisco, located within the Orange Park Sub-Area at 201 West Orange Avenue. The Project applicant seeks to demolish two of three existing buildings on this site, and to reconstruct new, larger, and more modern buildings to better accommodate their services and facilities. The third building would remain. CEQA Conclusions of this Document Infill Development Exemption Public Resources Code Section 21159.21 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15300 to Section 15333 include a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and are therefore exempt from further review under CEQA. Among the classes of exempt projects are those projects identified as Infill Development (CEQA Guidelines section 15332, or Class 32 Exemptions). The Project’s consistency with the requirements for a Class 32 Infill Development exemption are provided in this CEQA Checklist. As fully evaluated in this analysis, the Project qualifies for exemptions from additional environmental review. The Project is consistent with the development intensity and land use characteristics established by the 2022 South San Francisco General Plan Update (SSF 2040 General Plan). The potential environmental impacts associated with infill development of recreational and civic uses within the City’s parklands were adequately analyzed in the 2022 South San Francisco General Plan Update, Zoning Code Amendments and Climate Action Plan Environmental Impact Report (SSF 2040 General Plan EIR, State Clearinghouse Number 2021020064). The analysis contained in this CEQA document supports a determination that the Project qualifies for an exemption 30 I - Introduction BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 3 from further environmental review as specified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 for Infill Development projects. No Exceptions CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 identifies exceptions to an otherwise applicable CEQA exemption. These exceptions include projects with significant cumulative effects not otherwise addressed, projects with significant effects due to unusual circumstances, and projects that result in damage to scenic resources within a designated State Scenic Highway, that are located on a hazardous waste site, and/or that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. As analyzed in this CEQA document, there are no significant effects peculiar to the Project or its site, and no exceptions to a CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. No Additional Environmental Review Required This CEQA Analysis fully analyzes the environmental impacts of the Project to determine the most appropriate approach for its CEQA documentation and compliance. This analysis concludes that the Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula Orange Park Clubhouse Project qualifies for a CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 as an Infill Development Project, no exceptions to that exemption apply, and no new or additional environmental document is required. 31 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 4 II - Project Description Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGCP) partners with local schools to expand students’ school days and school years by providing after-school and summer programs. These programs are free, high quality and comprehensive services for students in kindergarten to and through college, including college placement. The Orange Park Clubhouse of the Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGCP) has been in operation at the Orange Park site since the early 1960’s. The existing Orange Park Clubhouse consists of a 3-building campus serving approximately 200 students in kindergarten through eighth grade (K-8). Building 1 is currently a single- story academic building and the Clubhouse main entry. Adjoining Building 2 is a high-bay gymnasium with a small two-story auxiliary classroom, office, and storage space. Building 3 is a small single-story structure primarily used for storage. The Orange Park Clubhouse is located on City-owned land that includes a common parking lot that also serves the adjacent Orange Memorial Park. The BGCP seeks to improve its current space and to expand services to include an added 150 high school students, reaching 350 total kindergarten through high school students. Their proposed project (the Project) intends to demolish the existing Buildings 1 and 3, to be replaced with new 2-story wood framed buildings of a slightly larger footprint. Building 1 would serve K-8 students and house a kitchen, cafeteria, and an adjacent secure outdoor play/eating area. Building 3 would serve high school students and include a secure, flexible outdoor space for quiet enjoyment. Both new buildings would provide internal access to the existing Building 2 Gymnasium. Improvements to the existing Gymnasium are limited to cosmetic improvements. The Project’s other proposed site improvements include re-stripping the existing parking lot, widening the perimeter concrete walkway, addressing accessibility per current code requirements, utility infrastructure improvements, adding a trash enclosure, and replacing the wooden good-neighbor fence at the northwestern property line. This chapter describes the currently proposed physical change to the Orange Park site and the proposed increase in student participation (together, the Project) as evaluated in this CEQA Analysis. The following includes a description of the site and surroundings, existing site conditions, the proposed use of the site, and required Project approvals. Project Location The existing BGCP’s Orange Park Clubhouse is in the Orange Park sub-area located in the center of South San Francisco, next to the Downtown, Lindenville, Avalon-Brentwood, and El Camino Real sub-areas. The Orange Park sub-area is split between single-family residential, and public parks land uses, including Orange Memorial Park (see Figure 1). As of 2021 the Orange Park sub-area contained about 5% of the City’s population. Orange Memorial Park is South San Francisco’s first and largest developed park, and as a community park it serves a citywide population. Orange Memorial Park includes ballfields, tennis courts and outdoor basketball courts; picnic shelters and bar-b-que areas; a children's play area and outdoor gym equipment; a sculpture garden; and a community swimming pool. The Project site is located within a linear strip of City-owned land immediately to the southwest of Orange Memorial Park, separated from the main portion of the park by the eucalyptus-lined Memorial Drive and the Centennial Way Trail (below which lies the underground BART tunnel). 32 Figure 1 Orange Park Sub-Area of the SSF 2040 General Plan Source: South San Francisco, 2040 General Plan, 2022, SHAPE SSF: 2040 GENERAL PLAN SUB-AREAS 6 104 105 ORANGE PARK The Orange Park Sub-Area is located in the center of the city, adjacent to Downtown, Lindenville, Avalon-Brentwood, and El Camino Real. The Orange Park sub-area is split between single- family residential, public, and park land uses and contains its eponymous park. As of 2021 it contains just around 5% of the City’s entire population. Vision Statement Orange Park is a high-quality place to live, learn, work, and play, and residents have ample opportunities to enjoy South San Francisco’s recreational amenities, including Orange Park, Colma Creek, and the Centennial Way Trail. Medium High Density Residential Medium Density Mixed Use Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Use School Medium Density Residential Parks and Recreation Streams General Plan Land Use Designations PARADISE VALLEY/TERRABAY The Paradise Valley/Terrabay sub-area is located at the far northeastern edge of the city, located between Highway 101 and Sign Hill. It is primarily composed of single-family residential uses, parks and open space. This sub-area has several smaller subdivisions and neighborhoods, including Peck’s lot and the Terrabay subdivision. The area includes a large PG&E-owned open space and the north face of Sign Hill. It contains just over 5% of the city’s entire population. Residents are less likely to identify as White alone and more likely to identify as Asian or Pacific Islander compared to the citywide average. Vision Statement Paradise Valley/Terrabay is a scenic, safe, and livable neighborhood with convenient access to Downtown, retail and personal services, and open spaces. Business Technology Park High Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Use School Open Space Medium Density Residential Urban Residential Public Parks and Recreation General Plan Land Use Designations Orange Park Subarea Project SIte Colma Cree k Colm a C r e e k 33 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 6 Other adjacent land use includes a row of six single-family homes on C Street to the west, the Good News Chapel to the southwest, and the Los Cerritos Elementary School to the south, on the opposite side of West Orange Avenue on C Street (see Figure 2). The Project site is located about 250 feet walking distance from Los Cerritos Elementary School, about 1,275 feet walking distance from the South San Francisco High School, about 2,500 feet walking distance from the new South San Francisco Library | Parks and Recreation Center at 901 Civic Campus Way, about 3,500 feet walking distance from Ponderosa Middle School, and about 3,900 feet walking distance from Parkway Heights Middle School. The Project site is about 1.3 miles from the South San Francisco BART station via Centennial Way Trail and is located adjacent to the SamTrans school-oriented Bus Route 37, which provides school bus service to Alta Loma Middle School, Spruce Elementary School and the South San Francisco High School, with a bus stop at the corner of West Orange Avenue and C Street. Project Site, Existing The existing BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse occupies an approximately 3-acre site that includes a 2.75-acre portion of APN 093-331-11 and the 0.25-acre APN 093-331-150, with a primary address at 201 West Orange Avenue. The BGCP leases the Orange Park Clubhouse site from the City of South San Francisco, which owns the much larger 2.75-acre APN 093-331-11 property and the 0.25-acre APN 093-331-150 property, as well as other properties comprising Orange Memorial Park to the northeast. The current Clubhouse is housed in three adjacent 1-story buildings with approximately 21,300 square feet of facility space (see Figure 3), including: • a one-story 9,500 square-foot Clubhouse (Building 1) • a nearly 9,400 square-foot, two-story tall gym (Building 2), and • a one-story 2,400 square-foot garage/storage space (Building 3) The existing Clubhouse building was constructed in 1961, and the gym and storage building (Buildings 2 and 3) were constructed at or about the same time. A drive-aisle with ingress/egress onto West Orange Avenue provides access to the existing Clubhouse, with 34 existing parking spaces (including 4 ADA-accessible parking spaces and one van-accessible space) located along the front of the Clubhouse. An additional 74 parking spaces are found along the north and westerly portions of the site. Parking is shared between the Clubhouse and Orange Memorial Park. The current BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse is a hub of community activity, with programs that run six days a week, serving up to its maximum capacity of 150 youth members daily, with 420 more members active in various BGCP-sponsored sports leagues. 34 Figure 2 Project Site and Adjacent Land Uses Source: BGCP, DevCon, Site Photo, Sheet A1.00, 11/20/24 Good News Chapel Orange Memorial Park Los Cerrito Elementary School Single-Family Homes on C Street Wes t O r a n g e A v e n u e Centennial Way Trail Project Site Boundary APN 093-331-150 APN 093-331-110 Exist. Building 1Exist. Building 2 (Gym)Exist. Building 3 35 Figure 3 Existing Site Improvements, Orange Park Clubhouse Source: BGCP, DevCon, Existing Site Plan, Sheet A1.01, 2/21/2025 PB BART ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BART TUNNEL BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE EXISTING BUILDING 1 (ONE-STORY)TO BE DEMOLISHEDEXISTING BUILDING 2(TWO-STORY) EXISTING BUILDING 3(ONE-STORY)TO BE DEMOLISHED 22 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) 10 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 10 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 1 E X I S T I N G PA R K I N G SP A C E 31 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 18 EXISTING PARKING SPACES(WITH 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) 16 EXISTING PARKING SPACES(WITH 4 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS) MAT C H L I N E 1A / A 1 . 0 1 MAT C H L I N E S 43°47'12" W 89.99' R=3689.57' D=8°07'49" L=523.56' R=3779.56' D=8°01'46" L=529.67' N 35°19'05" E 25.00' R=3754.56'D=0°06'42"L=7.32' S 54°47'38" E 177.63' S 54°47'38" E 1320.96' CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MEMORIAL DRIVE EXISTINGFRONTSETBACK ± 14'-6" ± 34'-5" EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 169'-10" EXISTING REAR SETBACK EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 16'-0" WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E SCOPE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, SEE SHEET A1.10 NOTE: EXISTING PARKING STALLS OUTSIDE OF THIS ZONE SHALL BE RE-STRIPED PER PLAN MIN. FRONT SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN.20'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. REAR SETBA CK LINE MIN.10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10'-0"MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10' -0" MAT C H L I N E MAT C H L I N E 22 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) N 35°19'05" E 25.00' R=3754.56'D=0°06'42"L=7.32' S 54°47'38" E 177.63' S 54°47'38" E 1320.96' MIN. REAR SETBA CK LINE MIN.10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:16:44 PM A1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"1B EXISTING SITE PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"1A EXISTING SITE PLAN - WEST PORTION EXISTING PARKING ANALYSIS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING STALLS:108 STANDARD STALLS (8'-6" X 18'-0"), INCLUDING 7 ACCESSIBLE STALLSMINIMUM ACCESSIBLE STALLS:5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PER 2022 CBC TABLE 11B-208.2 (INCLUDES 1 VAN STALL FOR EVERY 6 PER SECTION 11B-208.2.4) N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"Existing Site - West Portion Existing Site - East Portion 36 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 9 General Plan and Zoning General Plan Land Use Designation The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Parks and Recreation. This land use designation encompasses the larger Orange Memorial Park to the northeast, as well as the long open space corridor along the Centennial Way Trail/underground BART tunnel alignment. The Parks and Recreation land use designation is described as providing for parks, recreation complexes, public golf courses, and greenways. The BGCP facility is consistent with this land use designation as a recreational complex with social, academic, and career building mentorships, including the Barry Carr Sports Leagues, which ensures that all youth can access competitive sports where students exercise, learn life skills, and have fun playing sports like soccer, futsal, basketball and flag football. Zoning The Project site is in South San Francisco’s Parks and Recreation (PR) zoning district. The PR District is reserved for parks and recreation facilities, including parks, public golf courses, and greenways. • Public Park and Recreation Facilities are a permitted use in the PR zone • Indoor Sports and Recreation uses are a permitted use within the PR zone - these uses include playing fields, courts, gymnasiums, swimming pools, picnic facilities, tennis courts, golf courses, and botanical gardens, as well as related food concessions or community centers • Daycare facilities are a permitted use within the PR zone The after-school programming that the BGCP provides falls within the category of a daycare facility, as it is non- school programming for children and is providing care for children outside of the normal school day, and is a permitted use in this zone. The Project’s gymnasium fits the definition of a Park and Recreation facility for indoor sports and recreation, and is a permitted use in this zone. Detailed Project Description The proposed Project involves two components: • replacing the existing 1-story Clubhouse (Building 1) with a new, 2-story Clubhouse for K-8 grades, and replacing the existing small garage/storage space (Building 3) with a new 2-story Teen Center for high school students, and • increasing the number of students served at the BGCP Clubhouse from 200 to 350, with an expected addition of up to 150 new high school-aged students (an increase of 150 students, or a 75 percent increase in the number of students served by the BGCP. The specific components of the Project are further described below. Demolition The first phase of construction of the Project involves demolition of the 1-story, 9,500 square-foot Clubhouse (Building 1) and the one-story 2,400 square-foot garage/storage space (Building 3). To the extent that these buildings (which were originally constructed in the 1960s) may have asbestos-containing building materials, lead based paint or other hazardous building materials, these materials will be removed and disposed of in accordance with existing hazardous waste regulations. 37 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 10 New Construction Building 1 New Building 1 will be constructed within approximately the same 9,500 square-foot building footprint as the existing Building 1 (see greater detail in subsequent Figure 11), but will be replaced with a new 2-story (30-foot tall) structure of 19,720 square feet (9,990 square feet on the first floor and 9,730 square feet on the second floor). The new Building 1 is intended to serve students in grades K-8 and will include a main lobby, a kitchen and cafeteria, several multi-purpose rooms, elementary leadership offices, and restrooms. The second floor will include a boardroom/study hall, middle school leadership offices, several multi-purpose rooms, open game and recreations space, restrooms and administration offices. An elevator and 2 internal staircases will provide access to the second floor (see Figure 4). The primary finishes for the exterior of Building 1 would be dark grey and off-white plaster walls with copper and bronze-colored painted panels, and with dual-glazed clear glass storefront window systems. Silver-colored Boys and Girls Club signage and address board will be mounted to the façade (see Figure 5). Signage is not included in the current entitlements. Any desired signage will require sign permits per South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.360. New Building 3 New Building 3 (the Teen Center) will be constructed at the generally same location as the former 2,400 square- foot Building 3 (see greater detail in subsequent Figure 11), but as a larger 2-story, 30-foot tall structure of 9,770 square feet (4,960 square feet on the first floor and 4,810 square feet on the second floor). The new Building 3 is intended to serve high school students and will include a lobby, high school leadership team offices, a student lounge and game room, multi-purpose rooms and restrooms on the first floor. The second floor will include a high school library/academic support space, a technology room, multi-purpose rooms and group study areas. An elevator and 2 internal staircases will provide access to the second floor (see Figure 6). The primary finishes for the exterior of Building 3 would be dark grey and off-white plaster walls with copper and black colored painted panel accents, and with dual-glazed clear glass storefront window systems. Silver and black colored metal signage will be mounted to the façade (see Figure 7). Gymnasium (Building 2) Exterior improvements to the existing gymnasium are expected to be limited to new paint and signage, but may also include window replacement, new roofing and perhaps skylight replacement. Site Work Demolition, Grading and Foundations Demolition of existing Buildings 1 and 3 will include the removal of existing structures and foundations, pavements, and underground obstructions. Any vegetation and organic topsoil will be stripped in areas to receive new site improvements. Buried foundations from this structure and possibly previously existing structures may require the use of jackhammers to break apart and remove. Care will be taken to reduce vibrations when removing obstructions from the site, and equipment capable of generating large vibrations (such as hoe-rams) will not be used. 38 Figure 4 Orange Park K-8 Clubhouse (Building 1), Floor Plans Source: BGCP, DevCon, Building 1 Plans, Sheets A2.21 and A2.22, 2/21/25 * UP UP ** * **** * * UP E D C B 3 2 A.5F A 4 1 STAIR 2 MICROPLAZA BLDG 1MAINENTRANCE WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) WAL L G R A P H I C S ( A L T . ) RECEPTION WAITINGAREA/LOUNGE BIKE RACK 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS27' x 21' (567 SF)32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM27' x 21' (567 SF)32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM KITCHENCULINARYCLASS AV/ELEC. 21' X 16' 15' X 21' CAFETERIA35' X 43'DIRECTOR'SOFFICE STUDENTAGRR PUBLICAGRRSTAFFAGRR MULTIPURPOSE ROOM DRINKINGFOUNTAIN ELEMENTARYLEADERSHIP MAINLOBBY 23' X 16' KIT C H E N E T T E 7' X 13' ADULTAGRR BIKE RACK OUTDOORSPACE 24' X 45'(735 SF MAX OCCUPIABLE AREA) 11' X 14' 10' X 13'7' X 6.5' 7' X 7' 7' X 7' 7' X 7' GYMLOBBY11' X 21' 27' x 15' (405 SF)28 STUDENTS STORAGE12' X 4' LOADING/STORAGEAREA13' X 16' MALERESTROOM FEMALE RESTROOM BREAK-OUT7' X 7' BREAK-OUT7' X 7' BREAK-OUT7' X 7' JAN./STO. ELEVATOR9' X 8' 152'-0" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0"18'-0" 28'-0"24'-0"36'-0" 22' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22' - 0 " 66 ' - 0 " EXISTING GYMNASIUM WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) 1'-8 " WALL HOOKSWALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS SLI D I N G GLA S S WIN D O W 8'-0 " X 2 ' - 0 " CLE A R S T O R Y WIN D O W (8' - 0 " W A L L S I L L ) D.5 FSR CLOSET3' X 4' (SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 10 to 15 STUDENTS ALT ALT ALT ALT BENCH (ALT.) BEN C H ( A L T . ) WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS ALT ALT WAL L H O O K S WAL L H O O K S OPENCONGREGATION SPACE PRICE ALTERNATE:LEARNING STEPSSEE OPTION ALT STO . PRICE ALTERNATE:COLUMN COVER10'-0" HIGH 1'-8 " 8'- 0 " X 2 ' - 0 " CLE A R S T O R Y WIN D O W (8'- 0 " W A L L S I L L ) 10'-0" HIGH OPERABLE WALL/FOLDING PARTITIONBY MODERNFOLD OR APPROVED EQUALWITH PASS DOOR SEALEDCONC.FLOOR HALLWAY HALLWAY HA L L W A Y HA L L W A Y EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILINGEDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING HOLDOPEN HOLDOPEN BLDG 2GYMENTRANCE REC E I V I N G / SIG N - I N A R E A BENCH (ALT.)(P. LAM. MILLWORK) DRINKINGFOUNTAIN ALT 3'6"x7'0"DOOR ELEV. CTRL.CLOSET ROLL-UP WINDOW PTD PTD 18'-0"18'-0" STO R A G E 12' X 6' 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATIONELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE)3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE)BASE BID:3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES)NO SIDELITESALTERNATE:BASE BID DOOR +24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOWBASE BID:5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES3'-0" HIGH WALL SILLALTERNATE:5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE)PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTEINCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC)NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER.PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC)'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUALPRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH3.7'x3.5'FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'-0" 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACKCUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUALSEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN MAIN LOBBY, CAFETERIA, GYM LOBBY,OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE, GAME/REC AREA, GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACEFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, BREAK-OUT,THERAPHY, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOMFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STAIRSTREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOODSTRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINTHANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEELGUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAMEPRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONSTHAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOMFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES KITCHEN, CULINARY CLASS, LOADING/STORAGE AREAFLOOR: EPOXY BASE: 6" SELF-COVING EPOXY BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: 10 FT HIGH WASHABLE 2 X 4 CEILING TILES WITH WET SAFE LED LIGHTSROLL UP DOOR: MANUAL JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSFLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATORFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHESCEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURELEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKSCOUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKSWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORKPARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH)PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONSACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTORWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES LEARNING STEPS (OPTION 1 AND 2)FLOOR: RUBBERBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORKCOUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVESPLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE)MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILINGPROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK E D C 2 1 D.5 WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) ELEVATOR9' X 8' ALT ALT STAIR 1 PRICE ALTERNATE:COLUMN COVER10'-0" HIGH 1'-8 " LEARNINGSTEPS +16" +32" +48" HANDRAILAT ONE SIDE BENCH (ALT.)(P. LAM. MILLWORK) RUBBER FLOOR OVER PLYWOOD OVER WOOD FRAMEDPLATFORM AND STEPS. RUN RUBBERFLOOR OVER VERTICAL FACE OF PLATFORM AND RISER 3'6"x7'0"DOOR ELEV. CTRL.CLOSET 8'-0"8 TREADS @ 12"9 RISERS @ 5 3/8" 5'-0 " 4'-0 " 4 ' - 0 " ELEMENTARYLEADERSHIP11' X 14' GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL.3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN.2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2.3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• MULTI-PURPOSE• TECHNOLOGY• LIBRARY• BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL• GROUP STUDY• STUDENT LOUNGEPROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE• GAME/REC AREA• GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE• CAFETERIAPROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS:• SOUND STUDIO• SOUND BOOTH DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSETMAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSETJANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSETMULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSETALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSETDIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSETRESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:48 PM A2.21 BUILDING 1 1ST FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"3 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PARTIAL 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 LEARNING STEPS OPTION 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" E D C B 3 2 A.5F A 4 1 OPENGAME/REC AREA MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STUDENTAGRR STAFFAGRR GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE MALERESTROOM MECHSHAFT LACTATION ROOM7' X 9' 35' X 22' OFFICE8' X 10'MIDDLE SCHOOLLEADERSHIP ADMIN STAFFAGRRDRINKINGFOUNTAIN BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL27' X 21' 27' X 21' (567 SF) 21' X 21' OFFICE8' X 10' KIT C H E N E T T E 28' X 15'FEMALE RESTROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 26' x 21' (546 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 5' X 7' 5' X 7'7' X 7' 7' X 7' 27' x 21' (567 SF) 27' x 21' (567 SF)27' x 21' (567 SF) STAIR 2 32 STUDENTS32 STUDENTS32 STUDENTS BREAK-OUT7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' JAN./STO. 32 STUDENTS OFFICE8' X 9' 32 STUDENTS FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9'BENCH (ALT.)FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9'FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' ELECT/ROOF ACCESS4' X 5' 22' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 66 ' - 0 " EXISTING GYMNASIUM D.5 FSR (FURRING OPTIONAL) WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WAL L H O O K S WAL L H O O K S ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT KIT C H E N E T T E 1'-8 " 10'-0" HIGH OPERABLE WALL/FOLDING PARTITIONBY MODERNFOLD OR APPROVED EQUAL EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING HALLWAY HA L L W A Y EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING 60' X 11' DN PTD PTD MECHSHAFT3' X 5'MEC H . S H A F T 152'-0"28'-0"36'-0"18'-0"18'-0"28'-0"24'-0"36'-0"18'-0"18'-0" DN ELEVATOR9' X 8'STAIR 1ADMIN OFFICE8' X 10' 19' X 15' THERAPHY8' X 10'ALT OPENCONGREGATION SPACE/GAME/REC AREA 35' X 21' HALLWAY EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING MAIN LOBBY, CAFETERIA, GYM LOBBY,OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE, GAME/REC AREA, GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACEFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, BREAK-OUT,THERAPHY, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOMFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STAIRSTREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOODSTRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINTHANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEELGUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAMEPRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONSTHAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOMFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES KITCHEN, CULINARY CLASS, LOADING/STORAGE AREAFLOOR: EPOXY BASE: 6" SELF-COVING EPOXY BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: 10 FT HIGH WASHABLE 2 X 4 CEILING TILES WITH WET SAFE LED LIGHTSROLL UP DOOR: MANUAL JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSFLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATORFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHESCEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURELEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKSCOUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKSWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORKPARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH)PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONSACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTORWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES LEARNING STEPS (OPTION 1 AND 2)FLOOR: RUBBERBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORKCOUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVESPLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE)MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILINGPROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL.3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS.GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN.2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2.3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• MULTI-PURPOSE• TECHNOLOGY• LIBRARY• BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL• GROUP STUDY• STUDENT LOUNGEPROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE• GAME/REC AREA• GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE• CAFETERIAPROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS:• SOUND STUDIO• SOUND BOOTH FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATIONELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE)3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSINTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE)BASE BID:3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES)NO SIDELITESALTERNATE:BASE BID DOOR +24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)INTERIOR GLASS WINDOWBASE BID:5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES3'-0" HIGH WALL SILLALTERNATE:5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE)PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTEINCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC)NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER.PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC)'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUALPRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH3.7'x3.5'FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'-0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACKCUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUALSEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN DOOR HARDWARE NOTESPROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS:ENTRY LOCKSETMAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1)STOREROOM LOCKSETJANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSCLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSETMULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT,PRIVACY LOCKSETALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSETDIRECTOR'S OFFICEPASSAGE LATCHSETRESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:51 PM A2.22 BUILDING 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 2nd Floor 1st Floor 39 Figure 5 Proposed New BGCP Orange Clubhouse, Building 1 Renderigs Source: BGCP, DevCon, Building 1 Renderings, Sheet A3.01, 2/21/2025 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:31:39 PM A3.01 BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATION RENDERS PLANNING 2/21/2025 12" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 1 - NORTH-EAST FACADE RENDER 12" = 1'-0"2BUILDING 1 - EAST FACADE RENDER Building 1 - Northest Facade Rendering Building 1 - East Facade Rendering 40 Figure 6 Orange Park Teen Center (Building 3), Floor Plans Source: BGCP, DevCon, Building 3 Plans, Sheets A2.24 and A2.25, 2/21/25 ********* UP UP UP * HJK G 8 7 6 5 MAINLOBBY STUDENT LOUNGE HALLWAY EXISTING STORAGE EXISTING DANCE STUDIO BUILDING 2GYM ACCESS EXISTING STAIR 3 HIGH SCHOOLLEADERSHIP REC E P T I O N WAITINGAREA/LOUNGE31' X 21' (651 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STAIR 5 14' X 21' DRINKINGFOUNTAIN OUTDOORSPACE STAIR 4 KITCHENETTE THERAPHY8' X 10' KITCHENETTE WALL MOUNTSINK FORARTS CLASS (SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 26' X 15' 40 STUDENTS 31' X 21' (651 SF)40 STUDENTS 52' - 0 " 22' - 0 " 8'-0 " 22' - 0 " BENCH (ALT.) BIKE RACK BIKE RACK OFFICE8' X 10' ELEVATOR8' X 9' 96'-0" 32'-0"32'-0"32'-0" EXISTING GYMNASIUM 77' X 11'(735 SF MAX OCCUPIABLE AREA) PRICE ALTERNATE:REPLACE EXISTING DOOR WITHNEW PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (PAINTED FINISH)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) MALERESTROOMFEMALERESTROOMJAN4' X 5' EL E C / A V 3' X 8' STUDENTAGRR STAFFAGRR 7' X 7' 7' X 7' ALT ALT ALTWALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS 1'-8 " WALL HOOKS WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) STO R A G E 3'x7'DOOR EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING HALLWAY HALLWAY EDGE OF 8 FT HIGHGYP. BD. SOFFIT EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHACOUSTICAL CEILING BLDG 3MAINENTRANCE AREAFOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FSR PTD PTD BIK E R A C K S 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATIONELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE)3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE)BASE BID:3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES)NO SIDELITESALTERNATE:BASE BID DOOR +24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOWBASE BID:5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES3'-0" HIGH WALL SILLALTERNATE:5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE)PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTEINCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC)NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER.PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC)'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUALPRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'-0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACKCUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUALSEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL.3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN.2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2.3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• MULTI-PURPOSE• TECHNOLOGY• LIBRARY• BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL• GROUP STUDY• STUDENT LOUNGEPROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE• GAME/REC AREA• GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE• CAFETERIAPROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS:• SOUND STUDIO• SOUND BOOTH LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, THERAPHY,HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY, ACADEMIC SUPPORTFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TECHNOLOGY ROOMFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE MAIN LOBBY, STUDENT LOUNGE, GROUP STUDYFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. STAIRSTREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOODSTRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINTHANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEELGUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAMEPRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONSTHAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAYFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSFLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATORFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHESCEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURELEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORKCOUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVESPLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE)MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILINGPROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKSCOUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKSWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORKPARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH)PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONSACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTORWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSETMAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSETJANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSETMULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSETALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSETDIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSETRESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:57 PM A2.24 BUILDING 3 1ST FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 3 N 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" HJK G 8 7 6 5 EXISTING GYMNASIUM EXI S T I N G STA F F R R OPEN TO BELOW STAIR 5 25' x 31' (775 SF) EXISTING BACK OF HOUSE EXISTING BACK OF HOUSE HA L L W A Y EXISTING STAIR 3 31' X 29' (899 SF) SOUNDSTUDIO10' X 13' (130 SF) SOUND BOOTH10' X 7' (70 SF) 21' X 23' (483 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT 20' X 23' (460 SF) TECHNOLOGY ROOM STORAGE/ROOFACCESS ELEVATORCONTROL 52' - 0 " 22' - 0 " 8'-0 " 22' - 0 " ELEVATOR8' X 9' STORAGE9' X 5' 44 STUDENTS(49 MAX) 32 STUDENTS MECHSHAFT 24 STUDENTS 96'-0"32'-0"32'-0"32'-0" STAFFAGRR7' X 7' STUDENTAGRR7' X 7' JAN3' X 5' BENCH (ALT.) 26' X 21' (546 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM GROUPSTUDY STUDENTLOUNGE BOOTH3.7'x3.5' ALT ALT ALT ALT 23' X 21' (483 SF) STAIR 4 FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' BOOTH3.7'x3.5' WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS 1'-8 " DN DN DN DN HALLWAY3'6"x8'0"DOOR EDGE OF 10 FT HIGHSOFFIT & CEILING BOOTH3.7'x3.5' BOOTH3.7'x3.5' FSR 3'-0" X 5'-0" X 36" SILL MECHSHAFT FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATIONELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE)3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSINTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE)BASE BID:3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES)NO SIDELITESALTERNATE:BASE BID DOOR +24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOWBASE BID:5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES3'-0" HIGH WALL SILLALTERNATE:5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE)PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O.PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMESWITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALSCYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTEINCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC)NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER.PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC)'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUALPRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM.7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'-0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACKCUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUALSEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL.3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS.GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN.2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2.3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES.5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• MULTI-PURPOSE• TECHNOLOGY• LIBRARY• BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL• GROUP STUDY• STUDENT LOUNGEPROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS:• OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE• GAME/REC AREA• GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE• CAFETERIAPROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS:• SOUND STUDIO• SOUND BOOTH LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, THERAPHY,HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY, ACADEMIC SUPPORTFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TECHNOLOGY ROOMFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE MAIN LOBBY, STUDENT LOUNGE, GROUP STUDYFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. STAIRSTREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOODSTRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINTHANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEELGUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAMEPRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONSTHAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAYFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVECEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSFLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 124" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINTCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATORFLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER)BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHESCEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURELEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORKCOUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVESPLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE)MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILINGPROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKSCOUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKSWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORKPARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH)PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONSACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR)FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAYCUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS,SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLSCEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING.SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTORWITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH(MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.)ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.)PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERGARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC)PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES DOOR HARDWARE NOTESPROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS:ENTRY LOCKSETMAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1)STOREROOM LOCKSETJANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESSCLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSETMULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT,PRIVACY LOCKSETALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSETDIRECTOR'S OFFICEPASSAGE LATCHSETRESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO SOUND BOOTHFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: BASE WALL CONSTRUCTION (2X6 WOOD STUD WITH PLYWOOD WH. OCCURS)WITH 2 LAYERS OF DRYWALL OVER RESILIENT CHANNELS AT SOUND BOOTH SIDEAND MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATIONCEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILEWITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURESDOOR: 3'-0" X 8'-0" PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT)IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES (ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE FRAME)WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS AT TOP AND JAMBS,AND AUTO DOOR BOTTOM SEAL AND THRESHOLDWINDOW: 3'-0" X 5'-0" 9/16" THK. CLEAR LAMINATED GLASSIN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES (ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE FRAME)3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL SOUND STUDIOFLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILEBASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASEWALL: BASE WALL CONSTRUCTION (2X6 WOOD STUD WITH PLYWOOD WH. OCCURS)WITH 2 LAYERS OF DRYWALL OVER RESILIENT CHANNELS AT SOUND STUDIO SIDEAND MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATIONCEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTUREPRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C.DOOR: SEE BASE AND ALTERNATE SPECS FOR INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE)IN THE FLOOR PLAN LEGEND, BUT ADD AN AUTO DOOR BOTTOM SEAL AND THRESHOLD; AND ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE ALUMINUM FRAMES DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:30:00 PM A2.25 BUILDING 3 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 3 2nd Floor 1st Floor 41 Figure 7 Proposed New BGCP Teen Center, Building 3 Rendering Source: BGCP, DevCon, et.al., Building 3 North Elevation, Sheet A3.04, 2/21/2025 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:32:23 PM A3.04 BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATIONRENDER PLANNING 2/21/2025 12" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING 3 - NORTH-WEST FACADE RENDER 42 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 15 The proposed new buildings will be constructed at grade, with the same finished floor of the existing buildings, at elevation of approximately 30 feet. The new buildings will be supported on continuous and isolated spread footings, with a floor slab designed to bear on grade, which is similar to the existing building’s floor slab design. A moisture barrier will be placed directly beneath the slab. Accordingly, site grading for the Project will be limited to minor backfill for utility trenches and minor grading for the building pad, flatwork, and hardscapes. Landscape Landscape plans for the new Clubhouse buildings (see Figure 8) include new concrete paving pedestrian walks around the perimeter of the front (north) and sides (east and west), separated from the building by new irrigated planting areas. The easterly side of the site at the new Clubhouse will include a new outdoor cafeteria space with artificial turf surface, enclosed within a 7-foot metal fence. The westerly side of the site at the new Teen Center will include a new landscape consisting of 7 new trees to provide screening along the rear lot line, and new accent trees and a screening hedge along the westerly façade, where a new trash enclosure will be located. The westerly side of the site will also include a new stormwater treatment area (bioretention area) per the civil engineer’s recommendations. Along the rear lot line will be a new outdoor space of artificial turf, and the existing wood fence will be replaced with a new 6-foot-high wood “good neighbor” (i.e., non-porous) fence for noise attenuation. All planted area will include an automatic underground irrigation system designed for water efficiency in compliance with State and Water District water conservation measures. Parking Within the boundaries of the Project site there are 108 total existing parking spaces, most of which are used as parking for the adjacent Orange Memorial Park. The current BGCP Orange Clubhouse staff typically relies on use of those parking spaces nearest to the Clubhouse. The Project proposes to realign and restripe those parking stalls located across the front of each of the three buildings (new Buildings 1 and 3 and the existing Gym) to accommodate its own parking needs. The design plan shows 41 parking spaces located across the front of these buildings, and a small parking area to the west of Building 3 to accommodate four vans. To meet current accessibility requirements and electric vehicle requirements for the Project’s proposed 41 standard (non-van) parking spaces, the Project’s parking spaces will include: • 2 ADA-accessible parking spaces (one van and one standard size) located at the front of the existing Gym, mid-way between the entrances to new Buildings 1 and 3, and 2 ADA accessible parking space located in front of new Building 1. • One ADA-accessible parking space and the adjacent standard parking space in front of the Gym will be equipped with electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) capable of supplying electricity to electric vehicles. • 6 other parking spaces will be equipped as future EV charging spaces (EVCS), with raceways providing wiring from the building’s electrical panel to a service box near the EVCS spaces and with a dedicated circuit for future service of the EVCS. • The remaining 31 parking spaces across the Project’s frontage will be re-striped to accommodate standard sized vehicles. 43 Figure 8 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse, Landscape Plans Source: BGCP, DevCon, Landscape Layout Plan, Sheets L1.0, 2/21/2025 6' HIGH METAL FENCE 6' HIGH WOOD GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE ARTIFICIAL TURF HORSE TROUGH PLANTER BEDS BIKE RACKS7' HIGH VEHICULAR CHAINLINK ENCLOSURE FENCESAFETY BOLLARDS 44 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 17 The Project will also re-stripe the entire parking area within its boundaries (which includes approximately 140 other parking spaces) to better define the existing parking spaces as separate from the drive aisles and establishing a more clearly defined circulation route through the site for student drop-off and pick-up. For special events or occasions when student parking exceeds the Project’s parking supply, these other 140 city- owned parking spaces will remain available for such public use. The Project would also provide 12 short-term bike-parking stalls and 6 long-term bike-parking stalls at the main entrances and lobbies of Building 1 and Building 3. Utilities The existing Orange Park Clubhouse is served with water via an existing 12-inch water main within the West Orange Avenue right-of-way and is served with sewer service via an existing 10 sanitary sewer line adjacent to the Clubhouse, between the existing Building 1 and West Orange Avenue. The proposed Project will similarly rely on these existing utility mains to provide water and sewer service to the new buildings, at new connection points within the building. New Building 1 will also require a new fire service connection to the existing 12-inch water main, including installation of a new fire hydrant. For new Building 3, new water, sewer and stormdrain connections are required. There is an existing 8-inch water main within the C Street right-of-way, and the Project would include a new domestic water line and a new fire service line connection to this water main. There is an existing sanitary sewer utility hole at the southwesterly corner of Building 3, which connects to an 8-inch sanitary sewer line located at the terminus of C Street. The Project would include a new sanitary sewer connection to this existing sewer line at the utility hole. The C Street right-of-way also includes an underground 12” stormdrain line. The Project’s plans for Building 3 include constructing new stormdrain lines along the north, east and south facades of Building 3 that collect stormwater runoff from the roof and site improvements, convey this runoff to a flow-through planter for biofiltration, prior to discharge into this 12” stormdrain line. Orange Park Clubhouse is also served with electrical service via a take-off from the existing overhead power lines along the west side of West Orange Avenue. To best serve the new Project, a new electrical transformer is proposed to be located on a transformer pad at the southeasterly corner of Building 1, nearest the overhead lines. Increase in Staff, Students and Services Students and Services Increase An important part of the proposed Project is the expectation that the BGCP will be able to better serve South San Francisco’s high school student population with construction of the new Teen Center (Building 3). Specifically, BGCP anticipates an increased student population from 200 current K-8 grade students, to 350 students total (200 K-8 students and 150 high school students). The types of programs offered to K-8 grade students include academic tutoring to help elementary students build foundational math and literacy skills, enrichment programs like coding, sports leagues and photography; and restorative community circles for students to build and strengthen relationships while practicing social- emotional skills. The types of new programs offered to the new high school students include: • targeted intervention designed to enhance student engagement at school through relationship building, problem solving, resource linkage, academic support, and college/career exposure • enrichment programs like culinary, sports leagues and graphic design • career development opportunities through career panels, summer apprenticeships, summer internships, job shadowing and career mentorship, and 45 II – Project Description BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 18 • free mental health services to students through one-on-one therapy and group counseling 1 Staff Increase Currently, the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse is staffed with approximately 15 employees as teachers, mentors and administrative staff. With the addition of 100 high school students, the BGCP estimates they will increase staff with an additional 10 positions, for a total on-site staff of 25. Required Project Approvals The Project requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City of South San Francisco prior to implementation: • Design Review permit • Approval of a variance for a reduced interior side yard setback along the southerly lot line The Project applicant has applied for a variance to reduce the side yard setback behind a portion of new Building 1 to just 5 feet (rather than the zoning standard of 10 feet), to be able to reconstruct the new Clubhouse (new Building 1) on approximately the same footprint as the existing Building 1 and without encroaching into the PG&E easement and minimizing encroachment into the BART Zone of Influence. The Project will also require subsequent administrative permits for demolition, grading, stormwater control, and building permits. 1 BGCP, accessed at: https://www.bgcp.org/programs 46 III – Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 19 III - Project’s Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning In 2022, the City of South San Francisco adopted the City of South San Francisco’s 2040 General Plan Update (SSF 2040 General Plan). The SSF 2040 General Plan presents South San Francisco’s vision for the next two decades and, “provides a roadmap for the City to implement policies and actions that create a resilient community, improve the quality of life of its residents, and expand economic development opportunities.” The following analysis has been conducted to determine whether the proposed Project is consistent with the land use and development assumptions and improvement strategies of the SSF 2040 General Plan, and applicable zoning provisions and development standards of Title 20 of South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC), as updated commensurate with the SSF 2040 General Plan. To be considered eligible for CEQA exemptions and streamlining pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, the Project must be consistent with the development density established by existing zoning and the General Plan’s density-related policies for which the SSF 2040 General Plan EIR was certified. Consistency with SSF 2040 General Plan Update Land Use Policies The Project site and surrounding area to the northeast (Orange Park) has a General Plan land use classification of Parks and Recreation, intended to accommodate parks, recreation complexes, public golf courses and greenways (see Figure 9). Consistency: The Project is consistent with this land use classification. The Project includes a recreational complex (Building 2 – the Gym), provides sponsorship of recreational programing (the Barry Carr sports leagues that rely on recreational facilities provided at the adjacent Orange Memorial Park, and provides a location for after-school social and academic programs for students from grades K through high school. The BGCP has operated the Orange Park Clubhouse at this location since the early 1960s, and the Project provides a continuation, expansion and improvement to these on-going activities. FAR: The Parks and Recreation land use classification does not provide a maximum building intensity for recreation complexes or facilities such as the Project. Consistency: Whereas no maximum building intensity is proscribed, the Project represents a relatively low FAR across the 3-acre Project site, as calculated in Table 1. Table 1: Existing vs Proposed Building SF and FAR Existing Conditions Bldg. SF Proposed Project Bldg. SF Building 1 9,570 Building 1 19,720 Building 2 9,380 Building 2 9,380 Building 3 2,430 Building 3 9,770 Total / FAR (assuming 3-acre Project site) 21,380 / 0.16 FAR Total 38,870 / 0.30 Source: BGCP and DevCon, Orange Park Clubhouse Application, Sheet A0.00, 2/21/25 47 Figure 9 General Plan Land Use Designations Source: City of South San Francisco Zoning App, accessed at: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/f8cc96713dc94ff981cb319c7ba82936 Project Site 48 III – Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 21 Policies Related to Orange Park and Recreation Orange Park Vision Statement: “Orange Park is a high-quality place to live, learn, work and play, and residents have ample opportunities to enjoy South San Francisco’s recreational amenities, including Orange Park, Colma Creek, and the Centennial Way Trail.” Consistency: The Project provides South San Francisco students with an improved, high-quality place to learn and play, where these students will have ample opportunities to appreciate the adjacent Orange Park, and where pedestrian access is available via the adjacent Centennial Way Trail. Sub-Area Goal SA-31: Pedestrian connections, recreational amenities, and streetscapes are improved in Orange Park. Policy SA-31.1, Implement Orange Memorial Park Master Plan: Continue efforts to implement the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan. Continue to implement stormwater capture projects like the Orange Memorial Park updates to improve water quality and increase trash capture in the Colma Creek watershed. Action PR-2.1.2: Complete the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan. Consistency: As part of the City’s overall properties associated with Orange Park, the Project represents an improved recreational and learning space to complement the City’s other planned improvements in the park. GOAL PR-4: The City collaborates with a strong network of partners to improve and expand park and recreational opportunities across South San Francisco. Action PR-4.2.2, Provide Recreational Programing in Joint Use Facilities: Coordinate with the South San Francisco Unified School District and San Mateo County Health Department, as well as local health providers and other community organizations, to provide recreational programming not offered in nearby public parks or recreation centers, such as after-school fitness and education programs. Consistency: The Project represents a collaboration between the City (as underlying property owners) and the BGCP to provide improved recreational programming not offered in other nearby public parks or recreation centers, such as after-school fitness and education programs. Project’s Consistency with Zoning Permitted Land Use The Project site is zoned as Parks and Recreation (PR) zoning district (see Figure 10). The PR District is reserved for parks and recreation facilities, including parks, public golf courses, and greenways. • Consistency: Indoor Sports and Recreation uses are a permitted use within the PR zone - these uses include playing fields, courts, gymnasiums, swimming pools, picnic facilities, tennis courts, golf courses, and botanical gardens, as well as related food concessions or community centers. The Project’s existing gymnasium fits the definition of a Park and Recreation facility for indoor sports and recreation and is a permitted use in this zone. The Project is characterized as a daycare facility, which is a permitted use within the PR zone. The after-school programming that the BGCP provides falls within the category of a daycare facility as it is non-school programming for children, and is providing care for children outside of the normal school day. 49 Figure 10City of SSF Zoning Districts Source: City of South San Francisco Zoning App, accessed at: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/f8cc96713dc94ff981cb319c7ba82936 Project Site 50 III – Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 23 Development Standards Table 20.110.003 of the SSF Zoning Ordinance establishes the development standards applicable to all Civic- related zoning districts. The following Table 2 demonstrated the Project’s consistency with the development standards of the Park and Recreation (PR) district. Table 2: Project’s Consistency with PR Zoning Standards Standard Project as Proposed Lot Size (Min. Lot Area) 43,560 sf 129,800 sf - Consistent Max. Lot Coverage 25% 17% (22,627 sf) - Consistent Max. Main Building (ft) 30 ft 30 ft (2 stories) - Consistent Min. Front Setback 20 ft 20.5-foot minimum setback from West Orange Avenue - Consistent Min. Interior Side Setback 10 ft Building 1 is proposed with a minimum 5 ft setback from the property line abutting a residential district - Variance Requested The existing Gym (Building 2) has no existing setback from the rear property line abutting a residential district, and will remain as-is – Consistent as Legal Non-Conforming Use The proposed new Building 3 will have a minimum 10-foot setback from the abutting residential district - Consistent Min. Street Side Setback 10 feet NA Min. Rear Setback 0 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district 10 ft. - Consistent Min. Landscaping - The Project provides approximately 8,450 sf of new landscaped area within the site (3,110 sf t new Building 1, 120 sf in front of the Gym, and 5,220 sf at new Building 3) - Consistent Pursuant to SSF Zoning Code section 20.320.002, any lawfully established use, structure or lot that is in existence but does not comply with all the standards and requirements of the zoning Code shall be considered non- conforming. Nonconforming uses and structures may be continued and maintained, provided there is no alteration, enlargement or addition to any building or structure; no increase in occupant load; nor any enlargement of the area, space or volume occupied by or devoted to such use. The existing Gym (Building 2) does not have a rear setback from the property line, but it is not proposed to be enlarged or materially altered pursuant to the Project. Accordingly, the existing Gym is considered a legal, non-conforming use, and is not inconsistent with zoning. Building 1 is proposed with a minimum 5-foot setback from the property line abutting a residential district at its nearest, westerly corner (where the existing building has no setback), increasing to a 10-foot setback at its easterly corner near West Orange Avenue (where the existing building has an approximate 5-foot setback), as shown in Figure 11. Accordingly, the Project applicant has applied for a variance to reduce this side yard setback. Moving the location of proposed new Building 1 further towards the front parking area to provide a deeper side yard setback would result in an encroachment into the existing PG&E easement and further encroachment into the BART Zone of Influence area. The proposed new Building 3 will have a minimum 10-foot setback from the abutting residential district, and be fully consistent with the side setback standard (see also Figure 11). 51 Figure 11 Proposed New Buildings Relative to Existing Buildings and Setbacks Source: BGCP, DevCon, Site Plan, Sheet A1.10, 2/21/2025 PB ********* ** * **** * * SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES1. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS FOR INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE REGARDING DESIGN, LAYOUTS, UTILITIES, DIMENSIONS2. EXTERIOR PATHS SHALL: A. NOT EXCEED 5% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVELB. CROSS SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2%C. PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT CONTAIN VERTICAL TRANSITION EXCEEDING 1/2" HIGH.D. VERTICAL TRANSITIONS BETWEEN 1/4" AND 1/2" HIGH SHALL BE BEVELED AT 1:2E. CLEAR WIDTH FOR SITE PATHS SHALL BE 4'-0" MIN (EXCLUDING CURB DIMENSIONS)F. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE SLIP-RESISTANT3. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL CONTAIN LANDINGS MEASURING 5'-0" MIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. MINIMUM WIDTH OF LANDINGS SHALL BE THE DOOR WITH AND EXTEND 2'-0" BEYOND THE LATCH SIDE OF THE JAMB. LEVEL LANDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE AWAY FROM AND CROSS-SLOPE TO DOOR. 4. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION.5. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS LANES SHOWN SHALL BE MADE TO SUPPORT THE LOAD OF 75,000#. SCD FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. E D C B 3 2 (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE (E) METAL AND BRICK COLUMN FENCE CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL BA RT ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BA RT TUNNELBART ZONE OF INFLUENCE BUILDING 1 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 36'-0"28'-0"24'-0" 22 ' - 0 " A.5F A 4 1 10" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 152'-0" 66 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 4 FROM CONTROL TO GRID F HJKG 8 7 6 5 ~19,723 SF TWO-STORY (~9,992 SF L1 + ~9,731 SF L2) 30 FT MAX. HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 1 ~9,382 SF TWO-STORY (~7,726 SF L1 + ~1,656 SF L2)25 FT EXISTING HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 3 ~9,767 SF TWO-STORY (~4,960 SF L1 + ~4,807 SF L2) 30 FT MAX. HEIGHT EXISTING BUILDING 2GYMNASIUM MATCHLINE2A / A1.10 TRANSFORMER LOCATION,SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW HARDSCAPE,SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS EXISTING FLAG POLE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACERE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING MANHOLE, TO REMAIN NEW PARKING STALLS AND ASPHALT PAVING 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 96'-0" 32'-0"32'-0"32'-0"BUILDING 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 10" FROM CONTROL TO GRID G 11 ' - 2 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 8 PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENT NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE(SEE SHEETS A1.50 AND A3.07) NEW HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING GATE AND BOLLARDS TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE MATCHLINE NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL FUTURE DIGITAL DISPLAY BOARD, NOT A PART OF THIS APPLICATION NEW 7'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK ENCLOSURE AND SWING GATE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 8. 3 3 3 % 8. 33 3 %8. 33 3 % WASH AREA MEMORIAL DRIVE NEW BOLLARDS, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS D.5 WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 18'-0" 18'-0" PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENTAND GAS METERS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE APRON NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS OUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHEDOUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED PARKING STALLS, TYP. SEE SHEET A1.30 NEW LANDSCAPE ISLAND, TYPICAL SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 2B / A1.10MATCHLINEMATCHLINERE-STRIPE PARKING STALLSAS SHOWN, TYPICALRE-STRIPE AND CHANGE (E) ACCESSIBLE STALLTO NEW STANDARD STALL AND SHIFTVAN ACCESSIBLE STALL DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:17:26 PM A1.10 SITE PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"2BSITE PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"2ASITE PLAN - WEST PORTIONN010' 20'40'SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Building 1 - Northest Facade Rendering PB ********* ** * **** * * SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES1. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS FOR INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE REGARDING DESIGN, LAYOUTS, UTILITIES, DIMENSIONS2. EXTERIOR PATHS SHALL: A. NOT EXCEED 5% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVELB. CROSS SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2%C. PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT CONTAIN VERTICAL TRANSITION EXCEEDING 1/2" HIGH.D. VERTICAL TRANSITIONS BETWEEN 1/4" AND 1/2" HIGH SHALL BE BEVELED AT 1:2E. CLEAR WIDTH FOR SITE PATHS SHALL BE 4'-0" MIN (EXCLUDING CURB DIMENSIONS)F. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE SLIP-RESISTANT3. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL CONTAIN LANDINGS MEASURING 5'-0" MIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. MINIMUM WIDTH OF LANDINGS SHALL BE THE DOOR WITH AND EXTEND 2'-0" BEYOND THE LATCH SIDE OF THE JAMB. LEVEL LANDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE AWAY FROM AND CROSS-SLOPE TO DOOR. 4. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION.5. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS LANES SHOWN SHALL BE MADE TO SUPPORT THE LOAD OF 75,000#. SCD FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. E D C B 3 2 (E) CHAIN LINKFENCE (E) METAL AND BRICK COLUMN FENCE CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL BA RT ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BA RT TUNNEL BA RT ZONE OF INFLUENCE BUILDING 1 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 36'-0"28'-0"24'-0" 22 ' - 0 " A.5F A 4 1 10" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 152'-0" 66 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 4 FROM CONTROL TO GRID F HJK G 8 7 6 5 ~19,723 SF TWO-STORY (~9,992 SF L1 + ~9,731 SF L2) 30 FT MAX. HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 1 ~9,382 SF TWO-STORY (~7,726 SF L1 + ~1,656 SF L2) 25 FT EXISTING HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 3 ~9,767 SF TWO-STORY (~4,960 SF L1 + ~4,807 SF L2)30 FT MAX. HEIGHT EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM MA T C H L I N E 2A / A 1 . 1 0 TRANSFORMER LOCATION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW HARDSCAPE,SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS EXISTING FLAG POLE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACERE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING MANHOLE, TO REMAIN NEW PARKING STALLS AND ASPHALT PAVING 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 96'-0" 32'-0"32'-0"32'-0"BUILDING 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 10" FROM CONTROL TO GRID G 11 ' - 2 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 8 PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENT NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE,SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE(SEE SHEETS A1.50 AND A3.07) NEW HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING GATE AND BOLLARDS TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE MA T C H L I N E NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL FUTURE DIGITAL DISPLAY BOARD, NOT A PART OF THIS APPLICATION NEW 7'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK ENCLOSURE AND SWING GATE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 8. 3 3 3 % 8. 33 3 %8. 33 3 % WASH AREA MEMORIAL DRIVE NEW BOLLARDS, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS D.5 WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 18'-0" 18'-0" PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENT AND GAS METERS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE APRON NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS OUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHEDOUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED PARKING STALLS, TYP. SEE SHEET A1.30 NEW LANDSCAPE ISLAND, TYPICALSEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 2B / A1.10MATCHLINEMATCHLINERE-STRIPE PARKING STALLSAS SHOWN, TYPICALRE-STRIPE AND CHANGE (E) ACCESSIBLE STALLTO NEW STANDARD STALL AND SHIFTVAN ACCESSIBLE STALL DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:17:26 PM A1.10 SITE PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"2BSITE PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"2ASITE PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Outline of Existing Building to be Demolished 11’-2” Setback at Nearest Location 5’ Setback at Nearest Location Outline of Existing Building to be Demolished 10+’ Setback New Building 3 Location New Building 1 Location 52 III – Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 25 Parking The SSF Municipal Code Table 20.330.004 identifies the number of required parking spaces for a wide variety of land use types, providing that projects shall provide no more than the number of on-site parking spaces based on the particular characteristics of the proposed use. The BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project is a unique land use type not specifically identified in the Code requirements. The following is an estimate of the Project’s parking demands based on a best fit to the types of land uses identified in Table 20.330.004. Building 1 is proposed as a new Clubhouse for students in grades K-8, and its parking needs are most similar to a day care facility, with the only parking needs being those of its staff. Per Table 20.330.004 of the SSF Municipal Code, the parking requirements for a day care use are 1 parking space per employee, plus any additional parking pursuant to a Pick-Up/Drop-Off Plan. Consistency: Whereas the new Building 1 Clubhouse does not propose any increase in staffing or students in the K-8 grades, it parking demands will be similar to existing conditions, with a maximum demand for up to 15 employees. The Project does include a Pick-Up/Drop-Off Plan, whereby parents/guardians access the existing drive aisle at West Orange Avenue and make a circular loop through the parking lot to pick-up K-8 grade students in front of the new Building 1, and exit back out onto West Orange Avenue. Accordingly, the parking demand for Building 1 is approximately 15 parking spaces. New Building 2 is proposed as a Teen Center for high school students, and its parking demands are likely to be most similar to a high school. According to Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) parking rates, high schools generate a total parking demand ranging between 0.16 and 0.32 parking spaces per student, depending on whether its location is in an urban or suburban location. This parking demand accounts for the total parking demand including teachers, staff and students. Consistency: Whereas the new Building 3 Teen Center will serve high school students and will be located in close proximity to the SSF high schools that it serves, in an area well served by transit, and in an urban location, the applicable ITE parking rate for Building 3 is approximately 0.16 parking spaces per student. With 150 new high school students served by the Teen Center, its corresponding parking demand is estimated at 24 parking spaces. This would provide approximately 10 parking spaces for BGCP staff, plus 14 spaces for high school student parking. Based on these calculations, the Project’s total parking demand is estimated to be 39 parking spaces, and the Project proposes to provide 41 parking spaces across the front of its new buildings and the existing Gym, roughly equivalent to its estimated demand. ADA Compliant Parking Title 24, Table 11B-208.2 of CalGreen specifies requirements for ADA/handicap accessible parking. Pursuant to this Table, parking lots with between 25 and 50 parking spaces shall provide a minimum of 2 accessible spaces provided on the site. Consistency: The Project proposes to provide 2 accessible parking spaces, including 1 accessible van parking space, both located at the front of the existing Gym mid-way between the entrances to new Buildings 1 and 3, consistent with this requirement. Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations Per Section 20.330.008 of the SSF Municipal Code, the total number of required EV charging station spaces are specified in Table 20.330.008, or in accordance with the most current California Green Building Standards Code, whichever standard is greater. Table 20.330.008 identifies the requirement for 2 EV charging spaces where the total number of required or maximum parking spaces is between 26 and 250 for non-residential uses. Similarly, CalGreen Table 5.106.5.3.1 identifies the requirement for 2 EVSE charging spaces (with supplying electricity) 53 III – Project’s Consistency with General Plan and Zoning BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 26 where the total number parking spaces provided in a parking facility is between 26 and 50, and 8 EVCS spaces (with EV-capable raceways and electrical panel capacity) for a parking facility of between 26 and 50 spaces. The number of required EVSE spaces provided count toward the total number of required EVCS capable spaces. Per Section 20.330.008.c, where accessible parking requirements are required, at least one EV space or EV charging station shall meet current van-accessible dimensions, as defined by the California Building Code, and be connected to a barrier-free accessible route of travel to the building. The EV space with van-accessible dimensions shall be the first EV charging station established on the property. Consistency: The Project proposes to provide 8 electric vehicle-charging stations within its 41-space parking area. Of those, 2 will be EVSE spaces with supplying electricity, 1 for a van-accessible space, and 1 a standard accessible space. The Project will also provide a minimum of 6 additional EVCS spaces with EV-capable raceways and electrical panel capacity (for 8 total EV spaces), all of which will be located at the front of the existing Gym mid-way between the entrances to new Buildings 1 and 3. The Project will be consistent with all City and CalGreen requirements for electrical vehicle charging stations. Conclusions A finding of Project consistency with applicable General Plan policies and SSF Zoning Code regulations as evaluated in a prior program EIR (i.e., the SSF 2040 General Plan Update EIR) is required for the Project to qualify for a CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. As demonstrated above, the Project’s proposed improvements to the existing BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse are consistent with the intent of the General Plan’s Parks and Recreation land use designation, and that land use designation’s desired mix of land use types. The General Plan’s Park and Recreation land use does not provide for a maximum development intensity, or maximum FAR. The Project would increase the overall FAR of the approximately 3-acre site from an FAR of 0.19 to 0.30, and the Project will retain a relatively low FAR for the site, consistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the SSF 2040 General Plan Update EIR. The land use type proposed by the Project (the daycare uses, and the existing recreation use in the gym that will remain) are permitted uses within the underlying PR zoning district. The Project is consistent with regulations and development standards of the PR zone but does require approval of a variance for reconstruction of Building 1 approximately within the same footprint as existing Building 1, but as a 2-story structure with a 5-foot setback, rather than 10-foot side setback. The Project, with approval of a variance for the rear setback, is consistent with applicable PR zoning standards that apply to the site. As such, the Project qualifies as a Project that is consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan and/or zoning, as required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. 54 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 27 IV - Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption Would the Project: Yes No Applicable GP EIR Measures / Regulatory Reqmts Level of Significance a) Is the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies, as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations? ☐ - - b) Does the proposed development occur within city limits, on a project site of no more than five acres, substantially surrounded by urban uses? ☐ - - c) Does the project site have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species? ☐ - LTS d) Would Project approval result in any significant effects relating to transportation? ☐ - LTS e) Would Project approval result in any significant effects relating to noise? ☐ Construction Hours and Noise Limits (SSFMC Section 8.32.050) HVAC Mechanical Equipment Shielding (SSFMC Section 8.32.030) LTS f) Would Project approval result in any significant effects relating to air quality? ☐ Basic Construction Mitigation Measures (GP EIR MM AIR-1a) LTS g) Would Project approval result in any significant effects relating to water quality? ☐ BMPs for New Development and Redevelopment (SSFMC Section 14.04.180) Stormwater Treatment Requirements (SSFMC Section 14.04.131) Site Design and Stormwater Treatment Requirements for Regulated Projects (SSFMC Section 14.04.133) Low Impact Development (LID) Requirements (SSFMC Section 14.04.134) LTS h) Can the site be adequately served by all utilities and public services? ☐ - LTS a): General Plan and Zoning Consistency Yes No Is the Project consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies, as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations? As demonstrated in the prior chapter of this CEQA Exemption document, the Project’s proposed land use is consistent with the intent of the SSF General Plan’s applicable Parks and Recreation land use designation, and that land use designation’s desired mix of land use types. The General Plan’s Park and Recreation land use does not provide for a maximum development intensity, or maximum FAR. The Project would increase the overall FAR of the approximately 3-acre site from an FAR of 0.19 to 0.30, and the Project will retain a relatively low FAR for the site, consistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the SSF 2040 General Plan Update EIR. 55 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 28 The land use type proposed by the Project is a permitted use within the underlying PR zoning district. The Project is consistent with regulations and development standards of the PR zone but does require approval of a variance for reconstruction of Building 1 within approximately the same footprint as existing Building 1, but as a 2-story structure with a 5-foot setback, where Building 1 currently has no setback. The Project, with approval of a variance, is consistent with applicable PR zoning standards that apply to the site. As such, the Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies, as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The Project qualifies under criteria a) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. b): Site Location Criteria Yes No Does the proposed development occur within city limits, on a project site of no more than five acres, substantially surrounded by urban uses? The Project site is located within the Orange Park subarea of the SSF Generally Plan and is fully within the city limits of the City of South San Francisco. The Project site (the existing BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse and surrounding parking) occupies an approximately 3-acre site that includes an approximately 2.75-acre portion of APN 093-331-11, and the 0.25-acre APN 093-331- 150. The BGCP leases the Project site from the City of South San Francisco, which owns the much longer APN 093-331-11 property and the 0.25-acre APN 093-331-150 property (both of which are portions of the former Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way), as well as other properties comprising Orange Memorial Park. 2 The Project site is surrounded by other urbanized uses including the Orange Memorial Park to the northeast, single-family residences to the northwest, a church and single-family residences to the southwest, and the Los Cerritos Elementary School to the southeast. As demonstrated above, the Project would occur within city limits, on a project site of no more than five acres, and on a site that is substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project qualifies under criteria b) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. c): Habitat for Endangered, Rare or Threatened Species Yes No Does the Project site have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species? According to the South San Francisco General Plan EIR, the “majority of the City of South San Francisco and the surrounding region is highly urbanized and developed and contains little suitable habitat for special-status species aside from a few areas including Sign Hill Park, San Bruno Mountain State Park as well as the remaining pockets of saltmarsh habitat along San Francisco Bay.” The Project site is not proximate to Sign Hill Park, San Bruno Mountain State Park or saltmarsh habitat along San Francisco Bay. The Project site is not an identified “Protected Area”, it does not contain estuarine or marine aquatic resources, and it is not identified as containing 2 Per “Protect Tustin Ranch v. City of Tustin”, (2021) 70 Cal.App.5th 951, the Court confirmed that a “project site” may be limited to the proposed development area, not the size of the legal parcel 56 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 29 annual grassland, chaparral, oak woodland, coastal scrub, eucalyptus, riparian, wetland or lacustrine habitat types.3 The Project site is not an identified as an ecologically sensitive area and is not identified as a potential connectivity route for wildlife species, (although the nearby Orange Memorial Park is considered ecologically sensitive and a wildlife connectivity route as a large City park). The Project site is currently developed with existing buildings and surface parking lots, and with an ornamental grass lawn on the West Orange Avenue frontage. As indicated above, the Project site is surrounded by other urbanized uses. The Project site is separated from the tree-lined Memorial Drive and Orange Memorial Park by a paved portion of Centennial Way Trail. This urban location provides no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened plant or animal species, and the Project qualifies under criteria c) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. d) Transportation Yes No Would approval of the Project result in any significant effects relating to transportation? VMT and Screening Thresholds Pursuant to its 2022 General Plan Update, the City of South San Francisco adopted new Transportation Analysis Guidelines to provide a clear and consistent technical approach for analyzing projects that could have transportation effects on the City’s transportation system and services. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, the City of South San Francisco’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines include transportation- related thresholds of significance that replaced level-of-service metrics with vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thresholds. Based on guidance from the State of California’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR Technical Advisory, December 2018), the city’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines provide that land use projects that meet at least one screening threshold as presented in those Guidelines are not required to prepare a detailed vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis and are presumed to have a less than significant impact related to VMT. Those screening thresholds include: • Small Projects: Projects defined as generating 100 or fewer average daily vehicle trips, absent substantial evidence indicating that a project would generate a potentially significant level of VMT. • Locally Serving Public Facility: Locally serving public facilities that encompasses government, civic, cultural, health and infrastructure uses and activity which contribute to and support community needs, including locally serving public facilities including police stations, fire stations, passive parks, branch libraries, community centers, public utilities and neighborhood public schools. Small Project The existing BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse currently serves 250 students from grades K-8. The Project would improve the K-8 Clubhouse facility but is not proposing to increase the number of K-8 grade enrollment/ participation rate. The Project’s increase in enrollment/participation is due to construction of the new Teen 3 Reference SSF General Plan EIR, Figure 3.3-1: Existing Habitat Types and Protected Areas, and Figure 3.3-2: Ecologically Sensitive Areas 57 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 30 Center, which is anticipated to accommodate up to 150 new high school students. These new high school students comprise the change or increase in trips associated with the Project. To estimate the number of average daily vehicle trips attributed to the Project (the new high school students), several very conservative assumptions are presented below: • Assuming all trips attributed to these 150 high school students are new trips generated by the Project (as opposed to pass-by trips, where these students stop at the BGCP facility on their way home from school), these 150 new high school students would generate 300 total daily trips (1 arriving and 1 departing trip per student).4 • Assuming all these daily trips are made by private vehicle (either student drivers or as drop-offs) with an average of 1.5 students per vehicle, this would lower the total number of trips generated by the Project to 200 daily trips. • The BGCP would need to achieve an alternative mode split of 50% of the new high school students arriving and leaving via transit and/or walking to lower the total number of daily vehicle trips to fewer than 100, and to be considered a Small Project per the City’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines. As shown in Figure 12, the BGCP Project site is located less than one-half mile walking and bicycling distance from the central campus of South San Francisco High School via Centennial Way Trail, and less than three- quarters of a mile walking and bicycling distance from Baden High School via West Orange Avenue. Additionally, the BGCP site is located immediately adjacent to a bus stop at the corner of West Orange Avenue/C Street, along the SamTrans school-oriented Bus Route 37 serving South San Francisco High School and Baden High School, and also with an easy connection to the SamTrans school-oriented Bus Route 35 serving El Camino High School. It is reasonable to assume that at least 50 percent of the new high school students that participate at the BGCP Project after school will choose to walk, bicycle, or take the bus to the Project site, such that the Project would be likely to generate 100 or fewer average daily vehicle trips and meet the Small Project threshold. Locally Serving Public Facility The Project, including the new high school student component, meets the definition of a local-serving civic use that supports community needs (e.g., a community center). As such, the Project meets the City’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines that require projects to meet at least one screening threshold, and the Project is presumed to have a less than significant impact related to VMT. The Project needs to only meet one screening threshold criteria to be considered a low VMT project. The Project clearly meets the local-serving civic use criteria and likely meets the Small Project threshold as well. Accordingly, the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to transportation (as measured by VMT thresholds), and the Project qualifies under criteria d) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. 4 As a point of comparison, the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition estimates that a day care center (Land Use Code 565) has a weekday PM peak period pass-by rate of 44%, meaning that 44% of the trips to/from a daycare center in the PM peak period are part of a separate work-to-home, school-to-home or other trip, and not individually attributed to the daycare center. 58 Figure 12 Site Circulation Plan Source: BGCP, DevCon, Site Circulation Plan, Sheet A1.40, 2/21/2025 PB ********* ** * ***** * WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL NEW BUILDING 3 EXISTING BUILDING 2GYMNASIUM MA T C H L I N E 5A / A 1 . 4 0 MA T C H L I N E PEDESTRIAN AND ACCESSIBLE PATH OFTRAVEL, TYPICAL8.333% 8. 33 3 %8.333% MEMORIAL DRIVE BICYCLE CIRCULATION,TYPICAL VEHICLE CIRCULATION,TYPICAL NEW BUILDING 1 BLDG 2GYMENTRANCE BLDG 1MAINENTRANCEBLDG 3MAINENTRANCE 5B / A1.40MATCHLINEMATCHLINE SITE CIRCULATION LEGENDPEDESTRIAN PATHWAY AND ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL BICYCLE PATHWAY VEHICLE PATHWAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:17:39 PM A1.40 SITE CIRCULATION PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"5B SITE CIRCULATION PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"5A SITE CIRCULATION PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20'40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 59 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 32 e) Noise Yes No Would approval of the Project result in any significant effects relating to noise? Construction-Period Noise Construction noise generated by the Project will vary based on the construction equipment used, the equipment location, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The Project’s site preparation phases will include demolition of two of the three existing structures on the site and will generate among the highest construction noise levels. The demolition process and excavation machinery such as bulldozers, backhoes and heavy trucks can typically generate noise levels of 80 to 85 dBA Lmax at distances of 50 feet (or approximately 85 to 91 dBA Lmax at 25 feet) from the operating equipment. Subsequent phases of construction (i.e., pouring of new foundations and framing of the new structures) would likely produce similar to slightly lower noise levels, typically in the range of 85 dBA at a distance of 25 feet from the center of the active construction work. Land uses that surround the Project site include a church and single-family residences adjacent to the rear lot line of the Project site, and these uses are considered noise-sensitive uses. These nearest noise-sensitive land uses would be subject to temporary construction noise. Regulatory Requirements All construction activities within SSF, including the Project, are subject to the following regulatory requirements: Construction Hours and Noise Limits (SSF Municipal Code Section 8.32.050): Construction activities are limiting to the period between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. An exception may be granted to these hours only if an application for construction-related exception is made to and considered by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. Construction noise must also meet at least one of the following noise limitations: a) No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding 90 dB at a distance of twenty- five feet. If the device is housed within a structure or trailer on the property, the measurement shall be made outside the structure at a distance as close to twenty-five feet from the equipment as possible. b) The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed 90 dB. Construction noise attributed to the Project would be temporary, and the Project applicant and/or construction contractors will be required to obtain all necessary permits and to abide by all construction hours as stipulated by existing regulations. As such, the Project would not expose persons to a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan or SSFMC, and this impact would be less than significant. Permanent Operational Noise Typical operational noise sources attributed to the Project include the sounds of children/students engaged in outdoor activities at the Boys and Girls Club, traffic noise and parking lot noise attributed to vehicles dropping off and picking up children/students, and the new electrical and HVAC systems. These types of noise sources currently exist from the existing Boys and Girls Club but would incrementally increase commensurate with the addition of greater numbers of students and the larger buildings. 60 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 33 Outdoor Student Activity The current BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse is a hub of community activity, with programs that operate six days a week, serving up to its existing maximum capacity of 150 youth members daily. The current BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse is not a playground but rather provides educational programs and social engagement primarily within the interior of the Clubhouse, and recreational activities within the existing Gymnasium. Potential changes in noise that are expected to be generated by long-term operation of the Project could occur from the addition of an outdoor cafeteria space near Orange Avenue, a small outdoor space with artificial turf at the rear of the proposed new Building 3 (nearest to adjacent residences) and an increase in the number of BGCP student members at the facility. • The outdoor cafeteria space near Orange Avenue is separated from the nearest residential receptors by the new Building 1, which would effectively shield these sensitive receptors from outdoor student noise at this location, as well as a new ‘Good-Neighbor’ fence along the rear lot line of the Project site. • The small outdoor space with artificial turf at the rear of the proposed new Building 3 is not intended as an active outdoor play area, but as a quieter outdoor seating and study area. This space will also be shielded from adjacent residences with the new ‘Good-Neighbor’ fence along the rear lot line of the Project site. • Based on the properties of acoustics, a doubling (100 percent increase) in the number of BGCP student memberships would be required to generate a perceptible (i.e., a 3 dBA) increase in noise levels from general outdoor use. The Project would increase membership by approximately 75 percent (from 200 to 350 students), and would not generate a perceptible (i.e., a 3 dBA) increase in noise levels from general outdoor use. On-Site Vehicular Traffic The Project would not make any substantial changes to on-site entrances or internal drive-aisles. The on-site vehicle circulation pattern will be clarified to provide for access from West Orange Avenue at the current driveway entrance, with a looped counterclockwise circulation pattern that flows back out the same access onto West Orange Avenue (see Figure 13. This on-site traffic loop occurs entirely on the northerly portion of the site, and the new Clubhouse buildings effectively shield traffic noise from the majority of the on-site traffic loop to the adjacent residents to the south. The anticipated increase in traffic volume due to increased BGCP student memberships and associated student drop-offs and pick-ups would not double in volume and would not result in a perceptible (i.e., more than 3 dBA) increase over existing on-site traffic noise levels. Thus, the noise levels generated by on-site vehicular traffic generated by the Project would have a less than significant impact to off- site receptors. 61 Figure 13BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse, Proximity to Local Schools,Trails and School Bus Routes San Mateo map 0.570.28 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION© Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. 0.570 WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere 1: This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is forreference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current, or otherwise reliable.18,056 Miles San Mateo County Parkwood Heights Middle SchoolParkwood Heights Middle School Buri Buri Elementary SchoolBuri Buri Elementary School Alta Loma Middle SchoolAlta Loma Middle School South San Francisco Public LibrarySouth San Francisco Public Library El Camino High SchoolEl Camino High School Baden High SchoolBaden High School Sunshine Gardens Elementary SchoolSunshine Gardens Elementary School Sa m T r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 5 Sa m T r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 5 SamTr a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 SamTr a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 3/4-mile radius3/4-mile radius Ponderosa Elementary SchoolPonderosa Elementary School South San Francisco High SchoolSouth San Francisco High School Los Cerritos Elementary SchoolLos Cerritos Elementary School SamT r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 SamT r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 Sam T r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 Sam T r a n s S c h o o l R o u t e # 3 7 SSF BART StationSSF BART Station Ce n t e n n i a l W a y T r a i l Ce n t e n n i a l W a y T r a i l Cen t e n n i a l W a y T r a i l Cen t e n n i a l W a y T r a i l BGCP Orange Park ClubhouseBGCP Orange Park Clubhouse 62 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 35 Off-Site Traffic Noise The City of South San Francisco threshold for permanent traffic-related noise establishes that a significant impact would occur if a proposed project would cause the CNEL to increase by 5 dBA or more if the CNEL would remain below normally acceptable levels for a receiving land use; an increase of 3 dBA or more and causing the CNEL in the vicinity of the proposed project to exceed normally acceptable levels; or to increase 1.5 dBA or more where the CNEL currently exceeds conditionally acceptable levels. 5 Due to the logarithmic nature of additive noise sources, an accepted acoustic “rule of thumb” is that a doubling of traffic volume results in an increased noise level of approximately 3 dBA. As demonstrated above (under the topic of Transportation), the Project could generate between 100 to 300 daily trips, representing 1 arriving and 1 departing trip per new student, and the variations based on the number of assumed students per vehicle and assumptions about mode split. Even at the maximum of 300 daily trips, an increase of 300 vehicles per day would not double traffic volume on West Orange Avenue and would not result in an increased noise level of 3 dBA. Accordingly, the Project would not result in a significant increase in traffic noise in the vicinity of the Project site. New HVAC Systems Noise levels from commercially available mechanical ventilation equipment range from 50 dBA to 60 dBA Leq at a distance of 25 feet. The Project’s operational noise from proposed new stationary sources could potentially exceed the City’s thresholds at the adjacent sensitive receptor land uses. Operational noise from mechanical equipment can be mitigated either at the source or at the receiving land use by using setbacks, shielding, acoustic-rated windows, or by locating such equipment on rooftops or sides of buildings opposite sensitive receptors. Regulatory Requirements All new buildings within SSF, including the Project, are subject to the following regulatory requirement: HVAC Mechanical Equipment Shielding (SSFMC Noise Ordinance, Section 8.32.030): Prior to approval of building permits the applicant shall submit a design plan for the project demonstrating that noise levels from operation of mechanical equipment will not exceed the exterior noise level limits for a designated receiving land use category. Noise control measures may include but are not limited to the selection of quiet equipment, equipment setbacks, silencers, and/or acoustical barriers. With implementation of these standards, noise impacts from the Project’s stationary operational equipment would result in a less than significant impact. Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to noise, and the Project qualifies under criteria e) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. 5 City of South San Francisco, General Plan Update, Zoning Code Amendments, and Climate Action Plan Draft Program EIR, 2022, page 3-11-27 63 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 36 f) Air Quality Yes No Would approval of the Project result in any significant effects relating to air quality? Construction-Period Air Quality Emissions The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has developed screening thresholds for projects of smaller size that are unlikely to result in generation of construction-related criteria air pollutants or precursor emissions that exceed thresholds of significance.6 The BAAQMD’s screening methodology does not include a land use category that is a direct match for the unique Boys and Girls Club Project, but does include construction-period screening levels for a civic center, a day care, and for schools (elementary through high school). The construction-period screening level for reach of these types of uses is 425,000 square feet. With a total construction of 29,340 square feet of new space within Buildings 1 and 3, the Project is well below the construction-period screening thresholds, and the Project’s construction-period emissions of criteria air pollutants can be presumed to be less than significant. However, the BAAQMD’s 2022 CEQA Guidelines indicate that construction-period screening thresholds should not be used if construction-related activities include demolition. Whereas the Project does include demolition, the Project’s construction emissions have been modeled using the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod, Version 2022.1.0.14), to verify the less than significant presumption. Project- specific construction details were entered into the CalEEMod emissions calculator, including the following: site acreage of approximately 3 acres, but site disturbance of less than 1 acre attributed to the Project demolition of the 9,500 square-foot existing Building 1, and demolition of the 2,400 square-foot existing Building 3 excavation of approximately 1,060 cubic yards of soil from beneath future Buildings 1 and 3, and import of a similar volume of either lightweight cellular concrete or geofoam, as necessary to offset the weight of the new buildings within the BART tunnel’s Zone of Influence (see further discussion under potential Exceptions, Unusual Circumstances) grading associated with the new building footprints, new landscape areas and site flatwork (walkways and other concrete), for total of approximately 18,500 square feet (approximately 1/2 acre), with minimal soil export required 29,340 square feet of new building construction (new Buildings 1 and 3) A limited amount of new/replaced on-site pavement (assume 1,500 square feet), and approximately 6,500 square feet of new/replaced landscape The CalEEMod emissions calculator generated an assumed construction schedule of approximately 8 months, with an estimated start date of 6/3/2025 Model defaults were otherwise used. The CalEEMod emissions calculator results for construction-period emissions are included in Appendix A, and emissions from construction are summarized in Table 3. 6 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2022 CEQA Guidelines, Chapter 3 64 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 37 Table 3: Regional Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions during Construction Reactive Organic Gases Nitrogen Oxides PM10, Exhaust PM2.5, Exhaust Annual (tons/year) 1 0.22 0.65 0.03 0.02 Threshold 10 10 15 10 Exceed Threshold? No No No No Average Daily (pounds/day) 2 1.78 5.24 0.20 0.19 Average Daily Threshold 54 54 82 54 Exceed Threshold? No No No No Source: CalEEMod results per Appendix A Notes: 1. CalEEMod reports annual emissions during each calendar year (2025 and 2026). For purposes of this analysis, the annual emissions are presented as total emissions over a 1-year duration (or a 365-day period), which spans across 2025 and 2026 2: Per BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, average daily construction emissions are calculated based on annual emissions divided by the number of working days per year. Based on the CalEEMod emissions calculator, a 246-day construction period is assumed. As shown, the Project’s construction-period emissions of criteria pollutants would be well below threshold levels and this impact would be less than significant. Applicable General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures The SSF 2040 General Plan EIR identified implementation of construction mitigation measures to reduce construction-related emissions and dust for all projects, regardless of comparison to their construction-period thresholds. These basic measures are included in the SSF General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AIR-1a, and would apply to the Project: Basic Construction Mitigation Measures (GP EIR MM AIR-1a): The Project shall incorporate the following Basic Construction Mitigation Measures recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD): a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use, or by reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. 65 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 38 h. Prior to the commencement of construction activities, individual project proponents shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Consistent with the air quality impact analysis of the SSF 2040 General Plan EIR, the Project would be required to implement the BAAQMD’s recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures for control of construction- related criteria pollutant emissions, per GP EIR MM AIR-1a. These measures would further reduce the Project’s less than significant construction-related emissions. Operational Criteria Pollutants The Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s 2022 CEQA Guidelines also includes screening thresholds for projects of smaller size that are unlikely to result in generation of operational-period criteria air pollutants or precursor emissions that might otherwise exceed thresholds of significance. The BAAQMD’s screening methodology does not include a land use category that is a direct match for the unique Boys and Girls Club Project, but does include operational screening levels for a civic center (314,000 square feet), a day care center (232,000 square feet), an elementary school (488,000 square feet), a junior high school (475,000 square feet) and a high school (579,000 square feet). With a total construction of 29,340 square feet of new space within Buildings 1 and 3, the Project is well below the operational screening thresholds for these comparable land use categories. The Project’s operational emissions of criteria air pollutants can be presumed to be less than significant. This conclusion is also well-supported by the transportation analysis (above), which demonstrates that the Project would be a local-serving land use that would not generate significant vehicle miles traveled and therefore would not generate significant vehicle emissions of criteria pollutants. As demonstrated in the analyses below, and with implementation of all required City of Oakland SCAs, approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to air quality. The Project qualifies under criteria f) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. g) Water Quality Yes No Would approval of the Project result in any significant effects relating to water quality? As demonstrated in the analyses below, approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to water quality, and the Project qualifies under criteria g) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. The Project site is located in an urbanized portion of the city. The closest body of surface water to the Project site is Colma Creek, located to the northeast at a distance of approximately 750 feet. The surface grades at the Project site slope gently down from the north to the south away from Colma Creek, and the Project will have no direct effects on surface water or surface water quality. However, runoff from the Project site is collected within the city stormdrain system, which does eventually drain to the Bay. Construction-period runoff and operational stormwater runoff could have indirect effects on downstream surface waters, as discussed below. 66 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 39 Construction-Period Effects on Water Quality Construction associated with the Project would involve ground-disturbing activities that may increase the potential for erosion and sedimentation. Construction equipment could contribute pollutants to stormwater runoff in the form of sediment and other pollutants such as fuels, oil, lubricants, hydraulic fluid or other contaminants. If mobilized during construction, sediment and silt could also be transported to downstream receiving waters, and degradation of water quality could occur. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is implemented by the State Water Board to ensure that conditions present at a “regulated” construction site do not cause or contribute to direct or indirect impacts on water quality. Pursuant to NPDES c.6 provisions, Regulated Projects (i.e., projects that disturb one acre or more of soil during construction) are required to comply with the requirements of a Construction General Permit by filing a Notice of Intent to obtain coverage under that permit, by preparing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, and by implementing inspection, monitoring and reporting requirements. Although the Project site is approximately three acres in size, the Project would disturb less than one acre of soil during construction (approximately 16,200 square feet of land underlying new Buildings 1 and 3, a limited amount of pavement work surrounding the edges of the building, about 1,100 square feet of outdoor turf area, and exterior landscape areas). The Project is therefore not a Regulated project and is not subject to the requirements of a Construction General Permit. Applicable Regulatory Requirements The Project is subject to the following requirements of the SSF Municipal Code that apply to all construction sites: BMPs for New Developments and Redevelopments (SSFMC Section 14.04.180 9[d]): All construction sites in the city shall implement year round effective erosion control, run-on and runoff control, sediment control, active treatment systems (as appropriate), good site management, and non-stormwater management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to site grading, building and finishing of lots) until the site is stabilized by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures. The following items must be included in the Project’s construction and building permit plans as they are requirements of the Water Quality Control Stormwater and/or Pretreatment Program, and must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit: a. Storm drains must be protected during construction. Discharge of any demolition/construction debris or water to the storm drain system is prohibited. b. Do not use gravel bags for erosion control in the street or drive aisles. Drains in street must have inlet and throat protection of a material that is not susceptible to breakage from vehicular traffic. Consistent with applicable City regulations, the Project will be required to prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the site that includes all required BMPS to address construction-period water quality protection. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of any grading permits, and the Project applicant is required to implement the approved Plan. With required implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control, pollutants and sediment generated during construction will be managed to prevent or reduce indirect effects on downstream receiving waters, and construction-period effects on water quality will be less than significant. Operational Effects on Water Quality During the life of the Project, new student members, employees and vehicles may generate non-point source pollutants potentially including oil, grease and toxic chemicals from parking and driveway runoff, and litter. 67 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 40 These non-point source pollutants can be washed from impervious surfaces such as roofs and parking areas into the downstream drainage network, and directly into the Bay and other surface waters. Non-point source pollutants can have adverse effects on water quality and can also infiltrate into groundwater and degrade the quality of groundwater resources. Currently, about 96% of the Project site is covered by impervious surfaces (rooftops, pavement and sidewalk) and only about 4% (or 5,200 square feet) is covered by pervious grass along the West Orange frontage. The Project will increase on-site landscaping (pervious area), such that about 5% of the site will be pervious surfaces. The Project’s minor reduction of impervious surfaces will result in a minor reduction of non-point source pollutants, and a minor reduction in stormwater runoff and contaminants washed by rainwater into downstream receiving waters, but the large majority of the site will remain covered by impervious surfaces. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System’s C.3 provisions apply to Regulated Projects, defined as projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious area, or 5,000 square feet or more of new or existing impervious surface area within uncovered surface parking lots. Applicable Regulatory Requirements The Project will have well over 10,000 square feet of new or replaced impervious surface (including new buildings and re-paved areas) and is therefore considered a Regulated Project. The following regulations apply to all projects considered Regulated Projects under the NPDES C.3 requirements. Stormwater Treatment Requirements (SSFMC Section 14.04.131): Stormwater treatment requirements as specified in NPDES Permit are mandated for certain categories of new and redevelopment projects based upon the amount of impervious area created, added or replaced by a project. Stormwater treatment BMPs for Regulated projects shall incorporate hydraulic sizing design criteria as specified in NPDES Permit to treat stormwater runoff. Site Design and Stormwater Treatment Requirements for Regulated Projects (SSFMC Section 14.04.133): The Director of Public Works or designee shall require each Regulated Project to implement at least the following design strategies on-site: a. Limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; minimize compaction of highly permeable soils; protect slopes and channels; and minimize impacts from stormwater and urban runoff on the biological integrity of natural drainage systems and water bodies; b. Conserve natural areas, including existing trees, other vegetation, and soils; c. Minimize impervious surfaces, minimize disturbances to natural drainages, and minimize stormwater runoff by implementing one or more of the following site design measures: • Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse • Direct roof runoff, runoff from sidewalks, walkways and/or patios, and runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas • Construct sidewalks, walkways, driveways, bike lanes, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces Low Impact Development (LID) Requirements (SSFMC Section 14.04.134): The purpose of LID is to reduce runoff and mimic a site’s predevelopment hydrology by implementing specific practices to control potential sources of pollution and site design strategies to treat stormwater. All regulated projects shall implement LID requirements as specified in the NPDES Permit. 68 IV – Qualifications for an Infill Development Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 41 Project Plans Pursuant to Regulations Consistent with applicable City regulations and NPDES requirements, the Project includes a Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan for the site (see Figure 14). This Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan demonstrates that the Project will minimize impacts to stormwater runoff by directing runoff from new and replaced impervious surfaces into vegetated areas (flow-through planters with bubbler-boxes) prior to discharge into the City’s stormdrain system. The Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of any grading permits, and the Project applicant is required to implement the approved Stormwater Management Plan. The Project’s effects related to non-point source water pollution will be fully addressed through implementation of existing regulations, and this impact would be less than significant. Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to water quality, and the Project qualifies under criteria g) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. h): Utilities and Public Services Yes No Can the Project site be adequately served by all utilities and public services? The Project site can be adequately served by all utilities and public services, and the Project qualifies under criteria h) as an Infill Development pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. The Project is located adjacent to the existing Clubhouse building, which is already served by existing utilities. The Project will connect its new domestic water and sanitary sewer lines to existing water and sanitary sewer lines at the Clubhouse. The Project will also connect a short segment of new stormdrain to an existing stormdrain that routs stormwater runoff towards the Project’s proposed new bioretention basin prior to discharge into an existing 12-inch stormdrain that connects to the City’s downstream stormdrain system. The Project proposes to construct its new buildings at a location that is already provided with all necessary utility services and does not require or propose any new utility services for its operations. 69 Figure 14 Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Source: BGCP, DevCon, Preliminary SWCP, Sheets C3.1, C3.2 and C4.1, 2/21/2025 FF=30.5±FF=30.5± REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-002 02/21/2025 SV MK PLANNING 2/21/2025 12:04 PM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665www.kierwright.com MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T C3 . 2 PRELIMINARY GRADING,DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN Drainage Management Area 02 FF=31.0FF=31.0 MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T C3 . 1 REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California 95035(408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-002 02/21/2025 SV MK PLANNING 2/21/2025 12:04 PM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF THE PENINSULA 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665www.kierwright.com PRELIMINARY GRADING,DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN Treatment Control Measure 01 (Flow-Through Planter) Drainage Management Area 01 Bubler Detail Flow-Through Planter Detail Treatment Control Measure 02 (Flow-Through Planter) 70 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 43 V - Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, a CEQA exemption would not apply to the Project if the Project would trigger any of the exceptions to categorical exemptions based on site-specific environmental criteria. According to these CEQA Guidelines, a categorical exemption shall not be used for a project under the following circumstances: Exception Criteria: Yes No Applicable GP EIR Measures / Regulatory Reqmts Level of Significance a) Is the Project a Classes 3, 4, 5, 6 or 11 exemption that may be qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – i.e., in a particularly sensitive environment such that it may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies? ☐ - Not applicable b) Would the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time be significant? ☐ - LTS c) Is there a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances? ☐ BART Facilities Standard Design Criteria for Structural, Design and Construction near Existing BART Structures LTS d) Might the project result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway? ☐ - LTS e) Is the project located on a hazardous waste site that is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code? ☐ Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s Regulation 11, Rule 2 re: asbestos LTS f) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource? ☐ - LTS a): Location Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(a), classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 CEQA exemptions are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located--a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. 71 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 44 The Project is not considered as, or reviewed as a potential Class 3, 4, 5, 6 or 11 CEQA exemption and this exception does not apply. The Project site is in a typical urban location that is not of particular environmental sensitivity, and the Project will not impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern that is designated, precisely mapped or officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state or local agencies. Accordingly, the exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(a) does not apply to the Project. b): Cumulative Impact of Successive, Similar Projects Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(b), all CEQA categorical exemptions are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. GHG Emissions The BAAQMD has identified the necessary design elements required for new land use projects to achieve California’s long-term climate goal of carbon neutrality by 2045. If these design elements are incorporated into the design and construction of a project, then the project would contribute its portion of what is necessary to achieve California’s long-term climate goals - its “fair share”, and a lead agency reviewing the project under CEQA can conclude that the project would not make a cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change. The thresholds of significance for development projects (i.e., the Project) must either be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines (i.e., the SSF Climate Action Plan), or must meet the following project design elements of the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines: • Projects must include, at a minimum, the following project design elements: The project will not include natural gas appliances or natural gas plumbing (in both residential and non- residential development). Consistency: The Project’s energy demands will be served entirely by electricity, and no natural gas appliances or plumbing is proposed. • The project will not result in any wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy use as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b) (3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Consistency: The Project’s design is required to and fully intends to meet all applicable standards and requirements of the 2022 California Energy Code and the 2022 Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen), widely considered to be America's first sustainability-focused standard for greener, cleaner construction). • The project will achieve a reduction in project-generated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) below the regional average consistent with the current version of the California Climate Change Scoping Plan (currently 15 percent), or meet a locally adopted Senate Bill 743 VMT target that reflects those recommendations provided in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research's Technical Advisory. Consistency: As demonstrated in the Transportation section of this document, the Project is a local- serving community space that will not generate significant VMT and will not contribute a cumulatively significant contribution of transportation-related GHG emissions. • The project will achieve compliance with off-street electric vehicle (EV) requirements in the most recently adopted version of CALGreen Tier 2 Consistency: Pursuant to the requirements of South San Francisco Municipal Code Table 20.330.008 and 2022 CALGreen (July 2024 Supplement) Table 20.300.008, the Project has committed to provide 8 EV- capable (EVC) parking stalls, including 2 EVSE charging spaces (with supplying electricity) which will serve 1 standard parking space and one ADA-accessible van parking space. 72 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 45 Based on the above, the Project satisfies the design requirements necessary to demonstrate that it will contribute its “fair share” towards California’s long-term climate goals, and the Project will not make a cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change. Other Cumulative Effects As indicated elsewhere in this document, the Project is consistent with the SSF 2040 General Plan Update and with all applicable zoning regulations. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, this CEQA document needs not re-consider cumulative effects already addressed under the SSF 2040 GP. As fully analyzed in this document, the Project’s impacts under the topics of historic resources, transportation, water quality, noise and air quality are assessed in relation to the combined cumulative effects of other approved, pending and reasonably foreseeable future projects of generally the same type, and in the same general vicinity as the Project. These effects of the Project have been found to be less than significant and would not make a considerable contribution to any cumulative effects. The Project is individually unique and there are no successive projects of the same type in the same place. The Project is consistent with the development intensity as assumed in the General Plan EIR, and the Project’s potential contribution to cumulatively significant effects has already been addressed in that EIR. There are no further cumulative effects associated with the Project and an exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(a) does not apply to the Project. c): Unusual Circumstances Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(c), a categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The activities associated with the existing, and an expanded use of the site for a Boys and Girls Clubs of America facility is not unusual. The site has been used for this same activity since 1961, when the original building was dedicated. The surface of the BGCP site has no unusual characteristics. The current buildings on the site are associated with the Boys Club of America since 1961, and with the Boys and Girls Clubs of America since it was merged in 1990. The surrounding property is a typical parking area, also associated with the adjacent Orange Memorial Park. Underground BART When first constructed, the SSF Boys’ Club stood alongside the Southern Pacific Railway right-of-way and rail tracks. In the late 1990s, that surface rail track was replaced by the undergrounded BART extension to the SF International Airport, which opened in 2003. The presence of the underground BART line is an unusual circumstance that might present a significant effect on how the proposed Project is constructed. The following information pertaining to the presence of the BART tracks and the implications for the Project are derived from the following source: • Langan Engineers, Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site, March 21, 2025 (see Appendix B) The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District maintains a subsurface easement in the northeast part of the Project site and the underground BART tunnels and ventilation structures are within this easement. The BART tunnel alignment is oriented along Memorial Drive in the vicinity and runs roughly northwest-southeast. The approximate location of the BART tunnel alignment, interpreted from the BART as-built drawings, is shown 73 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 46 on Figure 15. 7 The bottom of the ventilation structure and tunnel structure adjacent to the site are about 35 feet beneath existing site grades. Design and construction of the Project needs to address BART Facilities Standards Design Criteria for Structural, Design and Construction near Existing BART Structures and Geo- Structures. All criteria should be considered in the design and construction processes, including those criteria as summarized below: • New structures must be designed and constructed so as not to impose any temporary or permanent adverse effects on existing BART structure, including temporary or permanent changes to loading on the BART structure • A minimum clearance needs to be maintained between the BART structure and the exterior face of new substructures • If shoring is required for any significant excavations in the ZOI, shoring design shall maintain at-rest soil conditions and be monitored for movement • A vibration monitoring plan shall be prepared to document the potential for induced vibration and noise from construction equipment, with procedures to ensure that they do not affect BART facilities and operations • Minimum soil cover over underground structures shall be maintained The BART tunnel location and the location where the temporary ZOI intersects the exterior ground surface at the Project site are shown on Figure 15. Because portions of the proposed new buildings for the Project are either within or very close to the ZOI, the following regulatory requirements are required of the Project: BART Facilities Standards Design Criteria: BART Guidelines will have to be considered during the design and construction of the foundation system for the proposed buildings. Since their construction, the BART tunnels have been subjected to the dead plus live loading from the existing Boys and Girls Club buildings and operations. The Project’s new buildings will be located at roughly the same footprint as the existing structures, but the Project’s two-story structure for Building 1 will extend southeast slightly further than the existing building footprint and will also likely be heavier than the existing one-story building. Building 3 will also extend northwest beyond the footprint of the existing structure. To mitigate any potential for additional for loading on the BART ZOI, the following design considerations for the Project are recommended:8 • The weight of the Project’s new buildings should be offset within the BART’s ZOI, such that the weight resulting from the future structures are no more than the weight that is currently present. This balance can be achieved by over-excavating beneath the planned building footprints within the BART ZOI and placing lightweight material, which may consist of lightweight cellular concrete (LCC) or geofoam (Insulfoam). • Where shallow foundations are located within the BART ZOI, they will need to be constructed so that they do not transfer lateral loads from the new building to the soil within the ZOI. 7 BART, San Francisco Airport Extension, Line, Trackwork and Systems Plan and Profile W2 357+00 to W2 369+00”, dated 05 March 2004 8 Langan Engineers, Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site, March 21, 2025 74 Figure 15 BART Tunnel and Zone of Influence NEW BUILDING 3 NEW BUILDING 1EXISTING BUILDING 2GYMNASIUM MEMORIAL DRIVE A CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL B-1 CPT-1 B-2 CPT-2 Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG02-731788601-B-SP0101.dwg Date: 3/21/2025 Time: 11:56 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 2 Site Plan © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Approximate scale 0 60 Feet Approximate location of boring by Langan, January 2025 Approximate location of cone penetration test byLangan, January 2025 Approximate limits of Existing One-Story Building Approximate limits of outer walls of BART subway box where in proximity of 201 West Orange Avenue Approximate limit of BART Zone of Influence atexisting ground surface Approximate PG&E easement boundary Approximate location of idealized subsurface profile EXPLANATION B-1 CPT-1 Reference: Sheet A1.10 of plans by Devcon Construction Incorporated titled "Orange Park Clubhouse, Boys andGirls Clubs of the Peninsula, 201 W Orange Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080," dated 12 March 2025. A'A A' Source: Langan, Geotechnical Investigation, Figure 2, 3/14/2025 0 0 15SCALE IN FEET 15 Notes: 1. The above profile represents a generalized subsurface cross sectioninterpreted from widely spaced borings. Soil deposits may vary in type,strength, and other important properties between points of exploration. 2. Approximate location of proposed structure is based on site plan provided byDevcon titled "Site Circulation Plan", dated 20 November 2024. 3. Approximate location of BART subway box is based on the San FranciscoAirport Extension Line as-built drawing titled "San Francisco Airport ExtensionLine, Trackwork, and Systems, Plan and Profile, W2 357+00 to W2 369+00",provided by San Francisco BART District (2004). 4. All elevations referenced herein are based on "Topographic Survey of 201West Orange Avenue for Hunter Properties Inc., South San Francisco,California", by Kier + Wright, dated March 2004 and reference NorthAmerican Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-XS0101.dwg Date: 3/21/2025 Time: 12:43 User: agekas Style Table: Apple LaserWriter 8500.ctb Layout: A-A'© 20 2 5 L a n g a n Approximate groundwater level measured during drilling Legend: 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 EL E V A T I O N ( f t , N A V D 8 8 ) -30 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 EL E V A T I O N ( f t , N A V D 8 8 ) -30 A A' 75 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 48 BART Engineering will need to review and accept the final geotechnical report and the structural plans and calculations for the Project, with evidence of BART Approval prior to issuance of building permits. With implementation of BART’s required design measure for the portion of the new buildings within the BART Zone of Influence, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment due to the unusual circumstances associated with the nearby presence of the underground BART tracks. Therefore, an exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(c) does not apply to the Project. d): Damage to Scenic Resources Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(d), a categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. Interstate 280 (I-280) is an officially designated State Scenic Highway from the South San Francisco and San Bruno border, south to Stanford University in Palo Alto. This portion of I-280 does not traverse through South San Francisco. While distant views of the City of South San Francisco and San Bruno Mountain are intermittently visible from this portion of I-280, most views of the City and San Bruno Mountain are shielded by existing trees. The Project site is approximately 1.25 miles from the nearest portion of this Scenic Highway, and the Project would not be visible from this portion of the Scenic Highway. I-280 from Mission Bay Drive to the South San Francisco/San Bruno border is eligible for designation but is not a designated State Scenic Highway. Views from this portion of I-280 include trees, local roadways and houses in the foreground, and views of South San Francisco, San Bruno Mountain and the San Francisco Bay in the distance. The Project site is just over 1 mile from the nearest portion of this eligible Scenic Highway, and the Project, even at its increased 2-story height, would not be distinctly visible from this portion of I-280. The portion of State Route 35 (Junipero Serra Freeway) that borders the western side of South San Francisco is also eligible for designation as a State Scenic Highway. Distant views of the City of South San Francisco and San Bruno Mountain are intermittently visible from SR-35, but the Project (at more than 2 miles distant from the nearest portion) would not be visible from this highway. The Project does not result in any significant change or damage to scenic resources as seen from the surrounding area, and the exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(d) does not apply to the Project. e): Section 65962.5 of the Government Code (i.e., Cortese List) Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e), a categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The following information pertaining to the presence of hazardous materials and the implication for the Project is derived from the following source: • AST Inc. Geotechnical, Phase I ESA for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, February 2025 (Appendix C) Section 65962.5 of the Government Code Hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 are known as the Cortese list. This list is comprised of identified sites with suspected and/or confirmed releases of hazardous materials to the sub-surface soil and/or groundwater that may create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. • Based on AST’s review of the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) ENVIROSTOR database, there are no records in the database for the subject property. The review of this database did not reveal 76 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 49 any documents or records, or any environmental concerns at the Project site. The Project site is not on the list of Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites, nor is it a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action. • Based on AST’s review of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s GEOTRACKER database, there is no documentation or records pertaining to any environmental concerns, activities or violations at the Project site. The Project site does not have an active Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or Cleanup and Abatement Order and is not a solid waste disposal site. The Project site is not an “active” or “open case” on the SWRCB list of leaking underground storage tanks, underground storage tanks, or Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup sites. • The Project site was identified in the regulatory databases under HAZNET (data extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC and the Hazardous Waste Tracking System, which collects manifest copies from the generator and destination facility) According to this data, 45 tons of asbestos-containing building material was hauled off from the site and deposited in a landfill facility. However, no violations were reported or associated with the property. Accordingly, the Project is not located on a site included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, and the exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e) does not apply to the Project. Site Conditions AST also conducted a site reconnaissance of the Project site and observed the following: • no vents, hatches, or unusual pipes visible to the naked eye protruding from the ground were observed • no pad mounted or pole mounted transformers were observed • no septic systems, drywells, pits or sumps, or groundwater wells were observed • no signs of any major stains or any unusual or potentially hazardous chemicals, drums, or containers that spilled, leaked or were left in the open were observed • no signs of any unusual spills or soil discoloration or odors or vegetation distress were observed • no sign of storage of hazardous material was observed inside the buildings, except for some household cleaning supplies • no visual indicators of current on-site aboveground or underground storage tanks were identified or observed, and there are no reported active or abandoned underground or aboveground storage tanks Due to the age of the structures at the Project site there is a chance that lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos- containing building material may have been used during construction of the existing buildings. The Phase I ESA recommends that the property owner consult with a certified Risk Assessor prior to commencement of any demolition or improvements or any construction activities that disturb materials or/ paints at the site to determine options for control of possible ACM and LBP hazards. Local and State regulations apply to ACM and LBP in association with building demolition and renovations, and worker and occupant protection. Therefore, the Phase I ESA recommends that ACM and LBP testing and assessment be undertaken. The Project poses a low to no threat to human health and safety, and to the environment. An exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e) does not apply to the Project. f): Historic Resources Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(f), a categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. 77 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 50 Information presented in the following portion of this CEQA document is derived from the following primary source: • Preservation Architecture, Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGC) at 201 W. Orange Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE), February 18, 2024, attached as Appendix D. The purpose of the HRE is to evaluate the built resource at 201 W. Orange Avenue and to determine whether it is or is not a historic resource pursuant to CEQA. This determination is based on the historical criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources. This effort has been prepared on the bases of site visits, City of South San Francisco permit research, San Mateo County records, along with applicable historical and historic architectural research including historical newspapers, maps and directories. The existing Building 1 (the existing BGCP Clubhouse) building was constructed in 1961-1962 for the Boys’ Club of South San Francisco, which relocated to this site from their previous location on Grand Avenue. Originally a boys’ club under the national Boys’ Clubs of America, the non-profit organization has served boys and girls since 1990 under the integrated Boys and Girls Clubs of America. The SSF Boys’ Club has since been the Orange Park Clubhouse of the Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula. When first constructed, the SSF Boys Club stood alongside the tracks and right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railway. In the late-1990s, that surface rail track was replaced in 20023 by the undergrounded BART extension to the SF International Airport. The existing parking lot was added when the rails were removed. The existing BGCP includes three buildings. Its original buildings include a front building (Building 1) with a mix of office, communal and recreational uses, and the central building (Building 2) is a high-bay gymnasium. Those two buildings were permitted and constructed in 1961, with gym construction extending into 1962. The architect for these buildings is Paul D. Markling and Associates of South San Francisco. A third and relatively small structure for storage use was added to the rear of the gym in 1968. Historic Context The BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse’s historic context is as a youth-serving recreational facility and, more specifically, the development of clubs organized by the Boys’ Clubs of America and, since 1990, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. There are 29 locations of Boys and Girls Clubs of America in San Mateo County, more than 100 Boys and Girls Clubs in California, and nearly 1,000 nationwide, each serving their local community.9 Historic Evaluation The BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse has not previously been evaluated for historic resource eligibility. The following evaluates the buildings using California Register (CR) evaluation criteria. To be eligible for listing on the California Register, a resource must be historically significant at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following four criteria: 1. Is it associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States? One directly associated event of historic interest is identifiable for the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse, which is the laying of the cornerstone for the new SSF Boys’ Club in July of 1961 by former U.S. President Herbert Hoover. This event was documented in news stories, and the cornerstone remains on the building. Based on this singular historic event, the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse meets this California Register criterion. 2. Is it associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history? 9 Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of America, accessed at: https://bgclubsca.com 78 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 51 Former U.S. President Herbert Hoover is associated with the BGC’s origins and based on this singular association, the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse meets this California Register criterion. 3. Does it embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or does it represent the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values? The front building (Building 1) has a modicum of Modern architectural design, but its design and construction lack distinction, and its original character has been altered over time. The Gym (Building 2) had a few modest original design elements, which have since been removed. The later rear addition (Building 3) is historically age eligible (greater than 50 years old), but its construction is a simple concrete block box. Thus, the buildings comprising the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse are not distinctive for design or for any potentially important or unique means of construction. The buildings do not have high artistic value.10 The BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse buildings are typical rather than distinctive of mid-century design and construction. Its architects at Paul D. Markling and Associates (for whom a small number of projects are identifiable) were modestly successful but add no historic artistic value to the building. The buildings are of no historic architectural importance, so do not meet this California Register criterion. 4. Does it yield, or have the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation? The BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse property and structure have not yielded and do not appear to have the potential to yield additional prehistoric or historic information. Therefore, the property does not meet this California Register criterion. In summary and relative to this modest resource, a historic event (California Register criterion 1) and historically important individual (California Register criterion 2) coincide with former President Herbert Hoover having presided over the dedication ceremony of this building in the summer of 1961. These criteria are in evidence in the cornerstone that is mounted in the block wall to the left of the north side entrance, which was pictured at the groundbreaking ceremony with President Hoover, who was a champion of the Boys’ Clubs of America.  Historic Integrity To achieve historic significance under the California Register, a resource must meet criteria and retain historical integrity that conveys its basis of historic importance in the present time. The historic basis for the BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse property is its association with a historic event and its association with a historic person, both dating to the building’s dedication on July 16, 1961. The California Register identifies “integrity” under seven aspects; location, setting, association, feeling, design, workmanship and materials. For a resource to retain integrity, the majority of these seven aspects must be substantially intact.  Relative to its cornerstone (which records these identified historic associations), historic location is intact. Conversely, historical setting and feeling are not intact relative to these associations because additional development of the facility followed this dedication date, as did subsequent and substantial changes to the site, its building and surroundings. Given the focused associations identified as being potentially historic, only location and association are intact, whereas the other five aspects of integrity are not. While an historic event and person are identifiably associated with the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, the originally modest and since substantially altered site and building do not convey those bases of significance. Rather, a singular element (the cornerstone) is the only evidence of this event (the cornerstone may also have been relocated from its original 10 Painted murals were added to the concrete walls flanking the entry, and those murals date to 2011, so cannot be evaluated as potentially historic. This assessment does not to dismiss their present relevance or interest. 79 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 52 location). In conclusion, the existing BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse does not have identifiable and substantial intact historic integrity based on the California Register criteria. The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and an exception under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(f) does not apply to the Project. 80 V – Potential Exceptions to a CEQA Exemption BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis page 53 Sources AST Inc. Geotechnical, Phase I ESA for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, February 2025 (Appendix C) Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2022 CEQA Guidelines BART, San Francisco Airport Extension, Line, Trackwork and Systems Plan and Profile, March 5, 2004 Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of America, accessed at: https://bgclubsca.com Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of the Peninsula and DevCon Construction Inc., et.al, Orange Park Clubhouse Application Materials, February 2025 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Lamphier-Gregory, CalEEMod Emissions Calculator Results for Construction-Period Emissions (Appendix A) Langan Engineers, Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site, March 21, 2025 (Appendix B) Preservation Architecture, Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGC) at 201 W. Orange Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE), February 18, 2024 (Appendix D) South San Francisco, City of; General Plan Update, Zoning Code Amendments, and Climate Action Plan and Program EIR, 2022 South San Francisco Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, accessed online at: https://ecode360.com/43450037 South San Francisco, Transportation Analysis Guidelines, 2022 81 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix A CalEEMod Emissions Calculator Results for Construction-Period Emissions Lamphier-Gregory 82 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix B Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site Langan Engineers, March 21, 2025 83 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix C Phase I ESA for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula AST Inc. Geotechnical, February 2025 84 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix D Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula at 201 W. Orange Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation Preservation Architecture, February 18, 2024) 85 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix A CalEEMod Emissions Calculator Results for Construction-Period Emissions Lamphier-Gregory 86 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 5 / 27 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Data Field Value Project Name BGCP Construction Start Date 6/3/2025 Lead Agency — Land Use Scale Project/site Analysis Level for Defaults County Windspeed (m/s)4.60 Precipitation (days)43.0 Location 37.6524520314033, -122.42792328267691 County San Mateo City South San Francisco Air District Bay Area AQMD Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area TAZ 1211 EDFZ 1 Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric App Version 2022.1.1.29 1.2. Land Use Types Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq ft) Special Landscape Area (sq ft) Population Description Day-Care Center 29.3 1000sqft 1.00 29,340 6,500 ———BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 6 / 27 1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit.ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Daily, Summer (Max)———— Unmit.30.7 18.1 0.52 0.49 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Unmit.0.55 5.38 0.22 0.20 Average Daily (Max)———— Unmit.0.97 2.34 0.09 0.08 Annual (Max)———— Unmit.0.18 0.43 0.02 0.02 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Daily - Summer (Max)———— 2025 1.23 18.1 0.52 0.49 2026 30.7 5.01 0.19 0.18 Daily - Winter (Max)———— 2025 0.55 5.38 0.22 0.20 2026 0.53 5.03 0.19 0.18 Average Daily ———— 2025 0.23 2.34 0.09 0.08 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 1 87 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 6 / 27 1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions SectorNo measures selected2. Emissions Summary2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against ThresholdsCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)Un/Mit.ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5EDaily, Summer (Max)————Unmit.30.7 18.1 0.52 0.49Daily, Winter (Max)————Unmit.0.55 5.38 0.22 0.20Average Daily (Max)————Unmit.0.97 2.34 0.09 0.08 Annual (Max)———— Unmit.0.18 0.43 0.02 0.02 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Daily - Summer (Max)———— 2025 1.23 18.1 0.52 0.49 2026 30.7 5.01 0.19 0.18 Daily - Winter (Max)———— 2025 0.55 5.38 0.22 0.20 2026 0.53 5.03 0.19 0.18 Average Daily ———— 2025 0.23 2.34 0.09 0.08 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 7 / 27 2026 0.97 1.19 0.05 0.04 Annual ———— 2025 0.04 0.43 0.02 0.02 2026 0.18 0.22 0.01 0.01 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.47 4.33 0.16 0.14 Demolition ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.24 0.01 0.01 Demolition ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 Demolition ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 8 / 27 Hauling 0.01 0.83 0.01 0.01 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.47 4.16 0.21 0.20 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 2 88 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 8 / 27 Hauling 0.01 0.83 0.01 0.01Daily, Winter (Max)————Average Daily ————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling< 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005Annual————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.47 4.16 0.21 0.20 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 9 / 27 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 1.09 10.1 0.46 0.43 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.11 0.01 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 3 89 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 9 / 27 Offsite ————Daily, Summer (Max)————Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily, Winter (Max)————Average Daily ————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 1.09 10.1 0.46 0.43 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.11 0.01 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 10 / 27 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Dust From Material Movement ———— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.12 8.01 0.06 0.06 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.52 5.14 0.22 0.20 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.52 5.14 0.22 0.20 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 4 90 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 10 / 27 Annual ————Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005Dust From Material Movement ————Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Offsite————Daily, Summer (Max)————Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling0.12 8.01 0.06 0.06Daily, Winter (Max)————Average Daily ————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00Vendor0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling< 0.005 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005Annual————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.52 5.14 0.22 0.20 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.52 5.14 0.22 0.20 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 11 / 27 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.18 1.75 0.07 0.07 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.32 0.01 0.01 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Worker 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily ———— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 5 91 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 11 / 27 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Average Daily ————Off-Road Equipment 0.18 1.75 0.07 0.07Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual————Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.32 0.01 0.01Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Offsite————Daily, Summer (Max)————Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00Vendor< 0.005 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily, Winter (Max)————Worker 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00Vendor< 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Average Daily ————Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00Vendor< 0.005 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 12 / 27 Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.49 4.81 0.19 0.17 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.49 4.81 0.19 0.17 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.10 1.01 0.04 0.04 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.18 0.01 0.01 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Worker 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily ———— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 Vendor < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 13 / 27 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.49 4.24 0.18 0.16 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 6 92 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 13 / 27 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.49 4.24 0.18 0.16 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Paving 0.00 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 14 / 27 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.12 0.86 0.02 0.02 Architectural Coatings 30.6 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Architectural Coatings 0.84 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Architectural Coatings 0.15 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 7 93 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 14 / 27 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual————Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Onsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Off-Road Equipment 0.12 0.86 0.02 0.02 Architectural Coatings 30.6 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 Architectural Coatings 0.84 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Architectural Coatings 0.15 ——— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ———— Daily, Summer (Max)———— Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 15 / 27 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max)———— Average Daily ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ———— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E Daily, Summer (Max)———— Total ———— Daily, Winter (Max)———— Total ———— Annual ———— Total ———— 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM2.5E 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 8 94 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 17 / 27 Subtotal ————Sequestered ————Subtotal ————Removed ————Subtotal ———— ————— 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 6/3/2025 7/1/2025 5.00 20.0 — Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/2/2025 7/4/2025 5.00 2.00 — Grading Grading 7/5/2025 7/10/2025 5.00 4.00 — Building Construction Building Construction 7/11/2025 4/17/2026 5.00 200 — Paving Paving 4/18/2026 5/2/2026 5.00 10.0 — Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/3/2026 5/17/2026 5.00 10.0 — 5.2. Off-Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 18 / 27 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ———— Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Demolition Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Demolition Hauling 6.85 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT Site Preparation ———— Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 9 95 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 18 / 27 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37GradingGradersDieselAverage1.00 6.00 148 0.41GradingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37GradingRubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37PavingTractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37PavingPaversDieselAverage1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42PavingRollersDieselAverage1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38PavingCement and Mortar Mixers Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ———— Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Demolition Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Demolition Hauling 6.85 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT Site Preparation ———— Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 19 / 27 Site Preparation Onsite truck ——HHDT Grading ———— Grading Worker 7.50 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grading Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Grading Hauling 66.3 20.0 HHDT Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT Building Construction ———— Building Construction Worker 12.3 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 4.81 8.40 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT Paving ———— Paving Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT Architectural Coating ———— Architectural Coating Worker 2.46 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor —8.40 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.5. Architectural Coatings BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 20 / 27 Parking Area Coated (sq ft)Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 44,010 14,670 — 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Building Square Footage) Acres Paved (acres) Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,900 — Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 — Grading 1,060 1,060 4.00 0.00 — Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.7. Construction Paving Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt Day-Care Center 0.10 0% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O 2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005 5.18. Vegetation 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 10 96 BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 20 / 27 Parking Area Coated (sq ft)Phase Name Residential Interior AreaCoated (sq ft)Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior AreaCoated (sq ft)Non-Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 44,010 14,670 —5.6. Dust Mitigation5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving ActivitiesPhase Name Material Imported (CubicYards)Material Exported (CubicYards)Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (BuildingSquare Footage)Acres Paved (acres)Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,900 —Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 — Grading 1,060 1,060 4.00 0.00 — Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.7. Construction Paving Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt Day-Care Center 0.10 0% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O 2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005 5.18. Vegetation BGCP Detailed Report, 4/10/2025 27 / 27 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)80.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Screen Justification Land Use User defined educational = B&G Club of Peninsula (2 new buildings) - using day care ctr as proxy Construction: Dust From Material Movement Site prep for new bldgs, landscape and sitework. For Grading, assume excavate and export 1,060 CY soil from BART ZOI, and import same 1,060 CY of InsulFoam under Buildings 1 (860 CY) and Building 2 (203 CY) Construction: Paving limited amount of new paving at parking lots - re-striping only 4-10-25 BGCP CalEEMod Construction Emissions 11 97 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix B Geotechnical Investigation of the BGCP Site Langan Engineers, March 21, 2025 98 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA – ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula 401 Pierce Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Prepared By: Langan CA, Inc. 135 Main Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Kelli McCurdy, PE Project Engineer Scott A. Walker, PE, GE Principal/Vice President 21 March 2025 731788601 99 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................ 3 3.1 Borings ................................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Cone Penetration Tests....................................................................................... 4 3.3 Laboratory Testing .............................................................................................. 5 3.4 Soil Corrosivity Testing ...................................................................................... 5 4.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 6 4.1 Site Conditions .................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................ 7 5.0 REGIONAL SEISMICITY AND FAULTING ...................................................................... 8 6.0 Seismic Hazards ............................................................................................................ 10 6.1 Fault Rupture ..................................................................................................... 10 6.2 Liquefaction and Associated Hazards ............................................................. 10 6.2.1 Liquefaction and Free-Field Liquefaction-Induced Settlement ......... 10 6.2.3 Seismic Densification ............................................................................ 11 6.2.4 Overall Seismic Settlement .................................................................. 12 6.2.5 Lateral Spreading .................................................................................. 12 6.3 Tsunami .............................................................................................................. 12 6.4 Flooding ............................................................................................................. 13 6.5 Sea Level Rise .................................................................................................... 13 7.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................. 13 7.1 BART Considerations ........................................................................................ 13 7.2 Foundations and Settlement ............................................................................ 15 7.3 Groundwater Considerations ........................................................................... 16 7.4 Corrosion Potential ........................................................................................... 16 7.5 Construction Considerations............................................................................ 17 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 17 8.1 Earthwork .......................................................................................................... 18 8.1.1 Site Preparation ..................................................................................... 18 8.1.2 Subgrade Preparation ........................................................................... 19 8.1.3 Fill Placement ......................................................................................... 19 8.1.4 Utility Trenches ...................................................................................... 20 8.2 Foundations ....................................................................................................... 21 8.3 Floor Slabs ......................................................................................................... 22 8.4 Seismic Design .................................................................................................. 23 8.5 Excavations ........................................................................................................ 24 8.6 Pavement and Concrete Flatwork Design ....................................................... 24 8.6.1 Flexible and Rigid Pavement ................................................................ 24 8.6.2 Concrete Flatwork ................................................................................. 25 100 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 8.7 Construction Monitoring .................................................................................. 26 8.8 Site Drainage ..................................................................................................... 26 8.9 Bioretention Systems ....................................................................................... 26 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES DURING DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE ................................................................... 27 10.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................ 28 REFERENCES FIGURES APPENDICES DISTRIBUTION 731788601.01_Geo Report_Boys and Girls Club SSF_2025-03-21 101 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page iv ATTACHMENTS FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Idealized Subsurface Profile A-A’ Figure 4 Map of Major Faults and Earthquake Epicenters in the San Francisco Bay Area Figure 5 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale Figure 6 Regional Seismic Hazard Zones Map APPENDICES Appendix A Logs of Borings Appendix B Cone Penetration Test Results Appendix C Laboratory Testing Appendix D Corrosivity Analyses with Brief Evaluation Appendix E BART Criteria Documents 102 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA – ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE South San Francisco, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed development at the Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse located at 201 West Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The project site is north of the intersection of C Street and West Orange Avenue; the approximate location is shown on the Site Location Map, Figure 1. The site is bordered by Centennial Way Trail and Memorial Drive on the north and east, West Orange Avenue on the southeast, and residential buildings on the southwest, as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The site is currently occupied by a one-story building that consists of three connected sections with a surrounding parking lot and landscaping. The existing building is currently being operated as a Boys and Girls Club and consists of a high-bay warehouse section to the north, a gymnasium at the center, and an office building section to the south. The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) district maintains a subsurface easement in the northeast part of the site; the underground tunnels and ventilation structure are within this easement. The BART tunnel alignment is oriented along Memorial Drive in the project vicinity and runs roughly northwest-southeast. The approximate location of the BART tunnel alignment, interpreted from the BART as-built drawings1, is shown on Figure 2. Furthermore, a 25-foot-wide Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) easement runs adjacent to the BART tunnels along the northeast edge of the existing building at the approximate location shown on Figure 2. We understand the current development plans will consist of demolishing the north warehouse section and south office building section and constructing two new buildings connected to the existing gymnasium (Existing Building 2). The new building to the south (New Building 1) will be 1 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District (2004). “San Francisco Airport Extension Line, Trackwork, and Systems, Plan and Profile, W2 357+00 to W2 369+00,” dated 5 March 2004. 103 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 2 two stories and the new building to the north (New Building 3) will be one story; both buildings will be constructed at grade. The finished floor will be near existing site grades at approximately Elevation 30½ feet2. The project architect is Devcon Construction, Inc. and the project structural engineer is IMEG Corp. (IMEG). Based on discussions with IMEG, static dead plus live column loads will range from 40 to 70 kips and bearing wall loads will range from 2.5 to 3.6 kips per foot beneath the new buildings. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Our services were performed in general accordance with our proposal dated 27 August 2024. We collected subsurface data during a geotechnical exploration at the site to evaluate the subsurface conditions. In addition, we reviewed available geologic and seismic hazard maps from the site vicinity. We performed engineering studies to develop conclusions and recommendations regarding: • soil and groundwater conditions at the site • site seismicity and seismic hazards, including faulting, liquefaction, and associated hazards • the most appropriate foundation type(s) for the proposed structures and associated settlements • design criteria for the most appropriate foundation type(s), including values for vertical and lateral capacities • recommendations for avoiding conflicts with the BART zone of influence, as applicable, and BART specific considerations • floor slabs • flexible and rigid pavements • site preparation, grading, and excavation, including criteria for fill quality and compaction • 2022 California Building Code (CBC) seismic design criteria, including site classification, mapped values SS and S1, modification factors Fa and Fv and SMS and SM1 • soil corrosivity with brief evaluation • construction considerations. 2 All elevations referenced herein are based on “Topographic Survey of 201 West Orange Avenue for Hunter Properties Inc., South San Francisco, California,” by Kier + Wright, dated March 2024 and reference North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). 104 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 3 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING To evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site, we drilled two borings and advanced two cone penetration tests (CPTs) at the site. The approximate locations of the borings and CPTs are presented on Figure 2. Prior to performing the field investigation, we: • obtained drilling permits from the San Mateo County Environmental Health Services (SMCEHS) • notified Underground Service Alert (USA) and followed up with USA utility companies • checked the boring and CPT locations for underground utilities using a private utility locator. The boring and CPT locations were coordinated to avoid potential underground utilities as well as the existing BART and PG&E easements northwest of the site. Details of the field exploration activities and laboratory testing are described in the remainder of this section. 3.1 Borings Two test borings, designated as B-1 and B-2, were drilled at the site at the approximate locations presented on Figure 2. The borings were drilled on 8 January 2025 by Exploration Geoservices, Inc. (EGI) of San Jose, California using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with hollow-stem-auger drilling equipment. The borings were advanced to depths of about 51½ feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). During drilling, our engineer logged the borings and obtained samples of the material encountered for visual classification and laboratory testing. Logs of the borings are presented in Appendix A as Figures A-1 and A-2. The soil encountered in the borings was classified in accordance with the Classification Chart presented on Figure A-3. Soil samples were obtained using two different types driven split-barrel samplers. The sampler types are as follows: • Sprague & Henwood (S&H) split-barrel sampler with a 3.0-inch outside diameter and 2.5-inch inside diameter, lined with steel or brass tubes with an inside diameter of 2.43 inches. • Standard Penetration Test (SPT) split-barrel sampler with a 2.0-inch outside diameter and 1.5-inch inside diameter, without liners. 105 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 4 The sampler types were chosen on the basis of soil type being sampled and desired sample quality for laboratory testing. In general, the S&H sampler was used to obtain samples in medium stiff to very stiff cohesive soil and the SPT sampler was used to evaluate the penetration resistance of sandy soil. The SPT and S&H samplers were driven with 140-pound, above-ground, automatic safety hammers falling 30 inches. The samplers were driven up to 18 inches and the hammer blows required to drive the samplers every six inches of penetration were recorded and are presented on the boring logs. A “blow count” is defined as the number of hammer blows per six inches of penetration. The blow counts required to drive the S&H and SPT samplers were converted to approximate SPT N-values using factors of 0.8 and 1.3, respectively, to account for sampler type and hammer energy, and are shown on the boring logs. The blow counts used for this conversion were the last two blow counts. The conversion factors are based on hammer efficiency data provided by EGI for the drill rig. Upon completion, the boreholes were backfilled with cement grout in accordance with the requirements of the SMCEHS. The soil cuttings from the borings were collected in 55-gallon drums, which were stored temporarily at the site, tested, and eventually transported off-site for proper disposal. 3.2 Cone Penetration Tests Two CPTs, designated as CPT-1 and CPT-2, were performed on 8 January 2025 by Pitcher Services, LLC (Pitcher) of Palo Alto, California at the locations shown on Figure 2. The CPTs were advanced to approximately 54 to 56 feet bgs. The CPTs were performed by hydraulically pushing a 1.7-inch-diameter, cone-tipped probe, with a projected area of 15 square centimeters, into the ground. The cone tip measures tip resistance, and the friction sleeve behind the cone tip measures frictional resistance. Electrical strain gauges or load cells within the cone continuously measure the cone tip resistance and frictional resistance during the entire depth of each probing. Accumulated data was processed by computer by Gregg Drilling, Inc. to provide engineering information, such as the types and approximate strength characteristics of the soil encountered. The CPT logs, showing tip resistance, side friction and friction ratio by depth, as well as interpreted soil classification, are presented in Appendix B. Soil types were estimated using the classification chart shown in Appendix B. 106 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 5 Pore pressure dissipation tests (PPDTs) were performed during the advancement of each CPT at various depths. PPDTs were conducted to measure hydrostatic water pressures and to determine the approximate depth to groundwater. The variation of pore pressure with time is measured behind the tip of the cone and recorded. One PPDT was performed in CPT-1 and two PPDTs were performed in CPT-2. For this investigation, the duration of the tests range from approximately 100 to 910 seconds. The results of the three PPDTs are presented in Appendix B and discussed in Section 4.2. Seismic Cone Penetration Testing (SCPT) soundings were performed during the advancement of CPT-1 and CPT-2. SCPT was conducted at five feet intervals to measure shear wave velocities through the soil profile. The shear wave velocity results are included in Appendix B. After completion, the CPT holes were backfilled with cement grout in accordance with SMCEHS requirements. 3.3 Laboratory Testing The soil samples collected from the field exploration program were reexamined in the office for soil classifications and representative samples were selected for laboratory testing. The laboratory testing program was designed to evaluate engineering properties of the soil at the site. Samples were tested to measure moisture content, plasticity (Atterberg Limits), gradation, R-value, and corrosivity, where appropriate. Results of the laboratory tests are included on the boring logs and in Appendix C. 3.4 Soil Corrosivity Testing To evaluate the corrosivity of the near-surface soil, we performed corrosivity tests on samples obtained from Borings B-1 and B-2 from the upper three feet of soil. The corrosivity of the soil samples were evaluated by CERCO Analytical using the following ASTM test methods: • Redox – ASTM D1498 • pH – ASTM D4972 • Resistivity (100% Saturation) – ASTM G57 • Chloride – ASTM D4327 • Sulfate – ASTM D4327. 107 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 6 The laboratory corrosion test results and a brief corrosivity evaluation by Cerco Analytical Inc. are presented in Appendix D. 4.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The existing site and subsurface conditions observed and encountered at the site, respectively, are discussed in this section. 4.1 Site Conditions The site is currently occupied by a one-story, concrete building constructed at grade with a surrounding parking lot and landscaping. The one-story building is currently being operated as a Boys and Girls Clubs called the Orange Park Clubhouse. The grades in the vicinity of the building slope gently down from the north to the south from about Elevation 33 feet to Elevation 28 feet, respectively. Foundation plans for the existing structure are currently not available. Based on our review of the topographic survey (Kier + Wright, 2024), the finished floor elevation of the interconnected building is at about Elevation 30½ feet. The approximate location of the existing structure is shown on Figure 2. As previously discussed, the BART district maintains a subsurface easement in the northeast part of site. Within the easement is a below-grade vent structure and two tunnels oriented parallel to Memorial Drive that run roughly northwest-southeast. The approximate location of the BART easement, ventilation structure, and tunnel structures are shown on Figure 2; these locations were taken from the San Francisco Airport Extension Line as-built drawings provided by San Francisco BART District (2004) and the topographic survey plan by Kier + Wright (2024). According to our review of the topographic survey plan, the below-grade tunnels are located within the footprint of the property and the ventilation structure is located about 50 feet northeast of the property boundary. According to our review of the as-built drawings for the BART ventilation structure and tunnels within the easement, the bottom of the ventilation structure and tunnel structure adjacent to the site are about 35 feet beneath existing site grades. PG&E maintains an easement located within the site and runs adjacent to the western edge of the BART tunnel alignment. The PG&E easement is oriented along the northeast edge of the existing building and runs from northwest to southeast, as shown on Figure 2. 108 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 7 4.2 Subsurface Conditions Our understanding of the local geology and soil conditions at the site is based on the results of our geotechnical investigation and our review of available regional geologic maps. Our interpretation of the subsurface conditions at the project site are summarized on the idealized subsurface profile, designated as A-A’, and presented on Figure 3. The results of our subsurface investigation and review of available geologic maps indicate the site is underlain by younger alluvium. The project area is underlain by young Holocene fluvial deposits that consists of sand and gravel interbedded with clay and silt layers. The soil encountered in the upper 5 to 8 feet within the borings and CPTs generally consists of medium dense to dense clayey sand and medium stiff to very stiff clay and sandy clay. These materials are consistent with young fluvial deposits. Where tested, the plasticity index (PI) of the clay within the upper five feet is about 8, indicating it has a relatively low expansion potential3. The upper 5 to 8 feet of soil are underlain by interbedded medium dense sand and gravel with various amounts of fines interbedded with stiff to hard clay with varying amounts of sand and gravel to a depth of about 17 to 19 feet beneath the ground surface. Below a depth of 17 to 19 feet we encountered dense to dense sand, with variable silt and clay content to the maximum depth explored of 56 feet bgs. This material is strong relatively, has low compressibility, and is consistent with Colma Formation geologic unit, which is present in the site vicinity. Groundwater levels were measured at depths of about 13.7 feet to 22.6 feet bgs in the borings, corresponding to approximately Elevations 16.8 feet and 7.4, during drilling of the borings at the site. These depths were recorded during and immediately after exploration and may not represent stabilized levels. PPDTs were also conducted in the CPTs, but were not conclusive. According to our review of the CGS Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the San Francisco South Quadrangle (CGS, 2021), historic high groundwater level in the project vicinity is approximately 10 feet bgs, corresponding to approximately Elevation 21 feet. Seasonal fluctuations in rainfall influence groundwater levels and may cause several feet of variation. 3 Soil with low to moderate expansion potential undergoes small to moderate volume changes with changes in moisture content. 109 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 8 5.0 REGIONAL SEISMICITY AND FAULTING The project site is in a seismically active region. Numerous earthquakes have been recorded in the region in the past, and moderate to large earthquakes should be anticipated during the service life of the proposed development. The San Andreas, Monte Vista-Shannon, and Hayward faults are the major faults closest to the site. These and other faults of the region are shown on Figure 4. For each of these faults, as well as other active faults within about 50 kilometers (km) of the site, the distance from the site and estimated mean Moment magnitude4 [2014 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) (2015) and Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Version 3 (UCERF3) as detailed in the United States Geological Survey Open File Report 2013-1165] are summarized in Table 1. The mean Moment magnitude presented on Table 1 was computed assuming full rupture of the segment using Hanks and Bakun (2008) relationship. TABLE 1 Regional Faults and Seismicity Fault Segment Approximate Distance from Fault (km) Direction from Site Mean Characteristic Moment Magnitude San Andreas 1906 event 3.2 Southwest 8.1 Pilarcitos 9.2 Southwest 6.7 Total San Gregorio 12 West 7.6 Monte Vista - Shannon 22 Southeast 7.0 Total Hayward-Rodgers Creek Healdsburg 26 East 7.6 Mission (connected) 34 East 6.1 Contra Costa (Lafayette) 37 Northeast 6.1 Butano 39 South 6.7 Total Calaveras 40 East 7.5 Franklin 40 East 6.7 Contra Costa (Larkey) 40 Northeast 6.0 Contra Costa Shear Zone (connector) 40 Northeast 6.6 Mount Diablo Thrust 42 Northeast 6.6 Contra Costa (Dillon Point) 45 Northeast 6.1 Concord 47 Northeast 6.4 Note: 1. The table above is a summary and does not include all the fault segmentation, alternate traces and low activity faults included in the UCERF3 model. 4 Moment magnitude is an energy-based scale and provides a physically meaningful measure of the size of a faulting event. Moment magnitude is directly related to average slip and fault rupture area. 110 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 9 Figure 4 also shows the earthquake epicenters for events with magnitude greater than 5.0 from January 1800 through August 2014. Since 1800, four major earthquakes have been recorded on the San Andreas fault. In 1836 an earthquake with an estimated maximum intensity of VII on the Modified Mercalli (MM) scale (Figure 5) occurred east of Monterey Bay on the San Andreas fault (Toppozada and Borchardt 1998). The estimated Moment magnitude, Mw, for this earthquake is about 6.25. In 1838, an earthquake occurred with an estimated intensity of about VIII-IX (MM), corresponding to an Mw of about 7.5. The San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 caused the most significant damage in the history of the Bay Area in terms of loss of lives and property damage. This earthquake created a surface rupture along the San Andreas fault from Shelter Cove to San Juan Bautista approximately 470 kilometers in length. It had a maximum intensity of XI (MM), an Mw of about 7.9, and was felt 560 kilometers away in Oregon, Nevada, and Los Angeles. The Loma Prieta Earthquake occurred on 17 October 1989 in the Santa Cruz Mountains with an Mw of 6.9, the epicenter of which is approximately 84 km from the site. In 1868 an earthquake with an estimated maximum intensity of X on the MM scale occurred on the southern segment (between San Leandro and Fremont) of the Hayward fault. The estimated Mw for the earthquake is 7.0. In 1861, an earthquake of unknown magnitude (probably an Mw of about 6.5) was reported on the Calaveras fault. The most recent significant earthquake on this fault was the 1984 Morgan Hill earthquake (Mw = 6.2). The most recent earthquake to affect the Bay Area occurred on 24 August 2014 and was located on the West Napa fault, approximately 64 km northeast of the site, with an MW of 6.0. The 2016 U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) predicted a 72 percent chance of a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area in 30 years (Aagaard et al. 2016). More specific estimates of the probabilities for different faults in the Bay Area are presented in Table 2. TABLE 2 Estimates of 30-Year Probability (2014 to 2043) of a Magnitude 6.7 or Greater Earthquake Fault Probability (percent) Hayward-Rodgers Creek 33 Calaveras 26 N. San Andreas 22 Concord/ Mt. Diablo 16 San Gregorio 6 111 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 10 6.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS The site is in a seismically active area and will likely be subjected to strong to violent shaking during a major earthquake. Hazards resulting from strong ground shaking are discussed in the remainder of this section. 6.1 Fault Rupture Historically, ground surface fault ruptures closely follow the traces of geologically young faults. The site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone, as defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act5, and no active or potentially active faults exist on the site. In a seismically active area, the remote possibility exists for future faulting in areas where no faults previously existed; however, we conclude the risk of surface faulting and consequent secondary ground failure at the site is low. 6.2 Liquefaction and Associated Hazards The site is in a seismically active area and will likely be subjected to strong shaking during a major earthquake. Strong shaking during an earthquake can result in ground failures such as those associated with soil liquefaction6, lateral spreading7, and seismic densification8. Each of these conditions has been evaluated based on our review of available information, field investigation, and results of our analysis, and is discussed in this section. 6.2.1 Liquefaction and Free-Field Liquefaction-Induced Settlement The site is within a zone designated with the potential for liquefaction, as identified in a map prepared by the California Geologic Survey (formerly known as the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology) titled Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Seismic Hazard Zones, San Francisco South Quadrangle, Official Map, dated 23 September 2021, as shown on Figure 6. Specifically, the map shows the site is in an area “where historic 5 The Alquist-Priolo Act zones certain faults which are known to be active. The CGS defines active as having recorded movement within Holocene time, or within the last 11,700 years. 6 Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated (submerged), cohesionless soil experiences a temporary loss of strength because of the buildup of excess pore water pressure, especially during cyclic loading such as those induced by earthquake. Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose, clean, saturated, uniformly graded, fine‑grained sand. 7 Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which surficial soil displaces along a shear zone that has formed within an underlying liquefied layer. Upon reaching mobilization, the surficial blocks are transported downslope or in the direction of a free face by earthquake and gravitational forces. 8 Seismic densification (also referred to as cyclic densification or differential compaction) is a phenomenon in which non-saturated, cohesionless soil is densified by earthquake vibrations, causing ground surface settlement. 112 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 11 occurrence of liquefaction, or local geological, geotechnical and groundwater conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacements such that mitigation as defined in Public Resources Code Section 2693 (c) would be required.” We used the CPT data to evaluate the potential for free-field, volumetric liquefaction at the site. The SPT blow count data from the hollow-stem-auger borings was judged to be unreliable because of the potential for heave and flow into the augers disturbing granular soil below the groundwater level. We used the historic high groundwater level of 10 feet beneath the ground surface for our liquefaction analyses. Layers of medium dense saturated sand, clayey sand, and silty sand varying in thickness up to approximately two feet were encountered at depths up to 46 feet bgs. Based on the results of our analyses, we conclude a few of these layers could potentially liquefy during a major earthquake and could experience liquefaction-induced settlement. We used the Boulanger and Idriss (2014) liquefaction triggering analysis method and a peak ground acceleration (PGAM) of 1.02g based on code seismic design values per ASCE 7-16 to compute earthquake-induced cyclic stress ratios. We estimated liquefaction-induced free-field settlement using the Zhang et al. (2002) post-earthquake displacement analysis method for CPTs. We also used the CPT data to evaluate contractive and dilative behavior of the soil based on the findings by Robertson (2016). The results of our analyses indicate several of these thin, isolated layers between the depths of 10 to 11½, between 14 to 15½ feet, and also between the depths of 24 to 27½ feet could have a significant buildup of excess pore water pressure and potentially liquefy during a major earthquake. However, the results of our contractive/dilative evaluation suggests that these layers are almost all dilative, meaning they are not subject to large strain behavior or significant settlement. Furthermore, the shear wave velocity in these layers also suggests they would resist liquefaction. We estimate that the total site and building settlement from the potential liquefaction of these layers is on the order of ½ inch. In addition, we conclude up to ½ inch of differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet could occur. The settlements discussed in this section are based on free-field conditions and do not include the impact of the structure on estimated settlements; see Section 6.2.2. for further discussion. 6.2.3 Seismic Densification Seismic densification can occur during strong ground shaking in loose, granular deposits above the water table, resulting in ground surface settlement. The degree of susceptibility to seismic 113 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 12 densification is directly related to the relative density of the existing granular soils. Seismic densification of non-saturated, cohesionless soil following a major earthquake was analyzed using Tokimatsu and Seed (1984) and Pradel (1998). We conclude the sand layers above the water table are sufficiently dense or have sufficient cohesion to resist seismic densification. 6.2.4 Overall Seismic Settlement For the proposed new buildings, we expect up to ½ inch of volumetric liquefaction-induced settlement could occur at the site and cause future settlement of the new buildings; no seismic densification is anticipated. Therefore, we estimate up to ½ inch of total seismically induced settlement could occur within the building footprints. Because the layers with potential liquefaction settlement are discontinuous, we estimate that up to ½ inch of differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet may occur during an earthquake. 6.2.5 Lateral Spreading Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which a surficial soil displaces along a shear zone that has formed within an underlying liquefied layer. The surficial blocks are transported downslope or in the direction of a free face, such as a channel, by earthquake and gravitational forces. Lateral spreading is generally the most pervasive and damaging type of liquefaction-induced ground failure generated by earthquakes. The site is relatively level; however, it is located about 700 feet away from the free face of Colma Creek (a concrete lined channel) that is northeast of the site. According to Youd et al. (2002), for significant lateral spreading displacements to occur, the liquefied soil should consist of saturated cohesionless sandy sediments with corrected blow counts (N1)60 less than 15. The sandy layers encountered at the site that are potentially susceptible to liquefaction are not continuous and have a corrected blow count (N1)60 greater than 15 blows per foot or have sufficient plasticity to resist liquefaction. In addition, lateral spreading was not observed at the site during the 1906 or the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquakes. We therefore conclude the potential for lateral spreading at the site is low. 6.3 Tsunami Recent maps published by the California Department of Conservation (2021) indicate the project site is not within the tsunami inundation zone; therefore, we conclude the potential risk by inundation from tsunami to be low within the project site. 114 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 13 6.4 Flooding Published maps (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2019) indicate the site is within Zone X, an area of minimal floor hazard. The project civil engineer should evaluate the potential risk of inundation from flooding. 6.5 Sea Level Rise Considering the site is at least three miles from the San Francisco Bay and higher in elevation, we conclude that sea level rise would not likely have a significant impact on the high groundwater level (Section 7.3) at the project site. 7.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS From a geotechnical standpoint, we conclude the proposed project is feasible provided the geotechnical issues discussed below are properly addressed during the design and construction of the proposed improvements. The primary geotechnical issues for this project include: • the presence of the BART tunnels near the project site • presence of relatively shallow groundwater • construction of the new foundation elements. The geotechnical issues and their potential impacts on the proposed project are discussed in the following sections. 7.1 BART Considerations Design and construction of the project should address the BART Facilities Standards Design Criteria, Structural, Design and Construction Near Existing BART Structures and Geo-Structures R3.2 December 2020. All criteria should be considered in the design and construction processes (see Appendix E for the comprehensive list of criteria); however, select criteria are summarized below: • New structures near existing structures shall be designed and constructed so as not to impose any temporary or permanent adverse effects on existing BART structures. Potential impacts to the existing BART structures by new design and construction shall be identified at the planning stage of design. 115 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 14 • Analyses of the existing BART structures are required when there are changes to the existing BART structures, or temporary or permanent changes to loading upon the existing BART structures due to the new design and construction. • The minimum clearance between any parts of the adjacent BART structures to exterior face of substructures (including temporary elements) shall be 7 feet 6 inches (7.5 feet). In addition, the substructures shall be located such that the loads from the foundations of the new structures shall not impact the BART structures. • The temporary BART Zone of Influence (ZOI) is defined as the area above or below a line from the critical point of the substructure at a slope of 1½ horizontal to 1 vertical. • The geotechnical engineer for the proposed structure shall determine the permanent effects or influence on the existing BART’s structure based upon the soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the proposed structures and the existing BART’s structures. Particular attention shall be paid to liquefiable soil, expansive soil, and lateral spreading. The slope of the permanent ZOI shall not be steeper than the slope of the temporary ZOI as defined above. • Shoring is required for significant excavations in the temporary and permanent ZOI. • Seismic and wind loads shall be accounted for in any shoring design for temporary and permanent shoring (see Geo-Structures 7.3 A for details). • Shoring shall maintain at-rest soil conditions and be monitored for movement. • Soil redistribution caused by temporary shoring or existing foundation system shall be analyzed. • Shoring support shall extend at least 10 feet below the base of the excavation or into a competent soil or rock layer, whichever is deeper, unless the geotechnical engineer shows that vertical and horizontal support requirements can be developed at less than 10 feet below the excavation depth. The minimum depth of shoring below the excavation depth shall be 2 feet. • A vibration monitoring plan shall be prepared to document the potential for induced vibration and noise from construction equipment and procedures, with respect to their effect on adjacent structures, BART facilities and operations. • Minimum soil cover of 8 feet on underground structures shall be maintained wherever possible. 116 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 15 Our interpretations of the BART tunnel locations and the location where the temporary ZOI would intersect the exterior ground surface elevations are shown on Figure 2. These interpretations are based on as-built drawings provided by San Francisco BART District (2004), the existing surface topography by Kier + Wright (2024), and proposed development plans provided by Devcon Construction (2024). Because portions of the proposed development are either within or very close to the ZOI, the BART guidelines will have to be considered during the design and construction of the foundation system for the proposed buildings. BART engineering will review the final geotechnical report and the structural plans and calculations. 7.2 Foundations and Settlement The primary considerations related to the selection of appropriate foundation system for the proposed new buildings are the building loads and anticipated settlements and proximity to the BART structures. As previously discussed, the proposed new buildings will be constructed at grade. Currently, we understand the finished floor of the new buildings will be roughly at the same elevation as the existing grades, about Elevation 30½ feet. We anticipate the soil to be exposed at the new buildings’ subgrade will consist predominantly of medium dense to dense clayey sand and medium stiff to very stiff clay and sandy clay. Based on the preliminary column loads provided by IMEG, we conclude the building can be supported on continuous and isolated spread footings designed per our recommendations in Section 8.2. As previously discussed, BART typically requires that new developments be designed to not impose any new vertical or horizontal stresses on their structures. Since their construction, the BART tunnels have been subjected to the dead plus live loading from the existing Boys and Girls Club building and operations. The new planned structures will be roughly the same footprint as the existing structures, with some exceptions (see Figure 2). However, the planned two-story structure for Building 1 will extend southeast slightly further than the existing building footprint and will also likely be slightly heavier than the existing one story building. In addition, the planned Building 2 will extend northwest beyond the footprint of the existing structure. Therefore, to mitigate any potential for additional for loading on the BART ZOI, we conclude the dead plus live (gravity) weight of the new building should be offset within the BART’s ZOI, such that the weight in the ground resulting from the future structure is the same as the weight that is currently present. This balance can be achieved by overexcavating beneath the planned building footprint within the BART ZOI and placing lightweight material. The lightweight material can consist of lightweight cellular concrete (LCC) or geofoam (Insulfoam). 117 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 16 In addition, where shallow foundations are within the BART ZOI, they will need to be constructed with a permanent void or compressible material on any vertical faces of foundations within the ZOI so that there is no lateral load transfer from the new building to the soil within the ZOI. The void or compressible material can be constructed by placing compressible foam, such as Insulfoam EPS 12, along the vertical face of the footings within the BART ZOI. After the building foundation is constructed and building loads are applied, the foundation pressure will increase, and the underlying sand and clay layers at depth will become reloaded. We conclude static settlement will consist of immediate recompression settlement. Based on the preliminary dead plus live column loads provided by IMEG for the new buildings, and for shallow foundations designed and constructed in accordance with our recommendations, we estimate total static settlement of spread footings will be less than ½ inch as the soil is reloaded. Differential settlement between adjacent footings spaced on the order of 30 feet should not exceed ½ inch. In addition, as discussed in Section 6.2.4, we anticipate up to ¾ inches of total seismically induced settlement could occur during a major earthquake on a nearby fault. 7.3 Groundwater Considerations Groundwater was encountered in our borings at depths from about 13½ feet to 22½ feet bgs, corresponding to approximately Elevations 17feet to 7½ feet. The historic high groundwater level in the project vicinity is approximately 10 feet bgs, corresponding to approximately Elevation 21 feet. The groundwater level is likely influenced by wet and dry seasons. On the basis of our knowledge of groundwater conditions at the site and in the vicinity, we conclude a high groundwater elevation of Elevation 21 feet is appropriate for design of permanent structures. 7.4 Corrosion Potential Because corrosive soil can adversely affect underground utilities and foundation elements, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the corrosivity of the near surface soil. CERCO Analytical performed tests on one soil sample to evaluate corrosion potential to buried metals and concrete. The results of the tests are presented in Table 3 and Appendix D. 118 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 17 TABLE 3 Summary of Corrosivity Test Results Boring Sample Depth (feet) pH Sulfates (mg/kg) Resistivity (ohms-cm) Redox (mV) Chlorides (mg/kg) B-1 3 7.46 N.D. 7,200 240 N.D. B-2 3 5.60 20 6,900 300 N.D. N.D. = None Detected Based upon resistivity measurements, the soil samples tested are classified as “moderately corrosive” to buried iron, steel, cast iron, ductile iron, galvanized steel and dielectric coated steel or iron. As a result, the chemical analysis indicates reinforced concrete and cement mortar coated steel may be affected by the corrosivity of the soil. To protect reinforcing steel from corrosion, adequate coverage should be provided as required by the building code. A corrosion expert should be consulted during the design phase for the most economical and effective corrosion protection, if necessary. 7.5 Construction Considerations We anticipate soil to be excavated from the site can likely be removed with conventional earthmoving equipment such as excavators and backhoes. We understand the northern and southern ends of the existing building at the site will be demolished. Buried foundations from this structure and possibly previously existing structures may require the use of jackhammers to break apart and remove. Care should be taken to reduce vibrations when removing obstructions from the site and equipment capable of generating large vibrations (such as hoe-rams) should not be used within the BART ZOI. If site grading is performed during wet weather, the exposed soil subgrade may become wet and difficult to compact. Wet soil may need to be aerated during dry weather prior to compaction, or the wet soil can be excavated and replaced with drier soil or aggregate base. If needed, the soil can be lime treated to aid in compaction. Light grading equipment may be needed to avoid damaging the subgrade. 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS From a geotechnical standpoint, the site can be developed as planned, provided the recommendations presented in this section of the report are incorporated into the design and 119 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 18 contract documents. Recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, seismic design, utilities, and other geotechnical aspects of the project are presented in the following sections of this report. 8.1 Earthwork The following subsections present recommendations for site preparation, subgrade preparation, and fill placement. 8.1.1 Site Preparation Demolition in areas to be developed should include the removal of existing structures and foundations, pavements, and underground obstructions. Any vegetation and organic topsoil should be stripped in areas to receive new site improvements. Stripped organic soil can be stockpiled for later use in landscaped areas, if approved by the owner and architect; organic topsoil should not be used as compacted fill. Demolished asphalt and concrete at the site can be crushed to provide recycled construction materials, including sand, free-draining crushed rock, or Class 2 aggregate base (AB), provided their re-use onsite is acceptable from an environmental standpoint. Where crushed concrete will be used in applications where free-draining materials are required, the material should have no greater than six percent by weight passing the 3/8-inch sieve. Where recycled Class 2 AB will be used beneath pavements and flatwork, it should meet requirements of the Caltrans Standard Specifications. Where crushed concrete or asphalt are mixed with soil to be used as fill, particles between 1½ and 3 inches in greatest dimension should comprise no more than 30 percent of the fill by weight. Existing underground utilities beneath areas to receive new improvements should be removed or abandoned in-place by filling them with grout. The procedure for in-place abandonment of utilities should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and will depend on location of utilities relative to new improvements. However, in general, existing utilities within four feet of final grades should be removed, and the resulting excavation should be properly backfilled based on the recommendations presented in this section. Where utilities to be removed extend off site, they should be capped or plugged with grout at the property line. It may be feasible to abandon utilities in-place, outside the proposed building footprint, provided they will not interfere with future utilities or structures. If utilities are abandoned in-place, the pipes should be completely filled with flowable cement grout over their entire length within the site limits. 120 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 19 8.1.2 Subgrade Preparation Prior to placement of fill or other improvements, the subgrade should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moisture-conditioned to above optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction9. Within vehicle pavement areas, the upper six inches of the pavement soil subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. If soft or loose soil is encountered at subgrade, it should be removed and be replaced with suitable fill that is properly compacted and moisture conditioned. The subgrade should be kept moist until it is covered with fill or other improvements. If the compacted subgrade is disturbed, it should be re-rolled to provide a smooth, firm surface. Clay exposed at the foundation level may be susceptible to disturbance under construction equipment traffic. Heavy construction equipment should not be allowed directly on the final subgrade. If stabilization or winterization is needed, it may be prudent to lime treat or to place a temporary layer of crushed rock to protect the final subgrade. 8.1.3 Fill Placement We anticipate fill placement at the site will consist primarily of backfill for utility trenches and minor grading for the building pad, flatwork, and hardscapes. We anticipate that soil excavated during construction will generally be acceptable for use as general fill and backfill. Soil excavated beneath buildings or flatwork will likely require significant drying before it can be used as fill and compacted to the specified relative compaction. Any on- site soil or imported fill used as fill and backfill should meet the following criteria: • be free of organic matter or other deleterious material; • contain no rocks or lumps larger than three inches in greatest dimension; • have a low expansion potential (defined by a liquid limit of less than 40 and plasticity index lower than 12); • have at least 15 percent fines (particles passing the No. 200 sieve); • be non-hazardous and approved by the project corrosion consultant; • be approved by Langan. 9 Relative compaction refers to the in-place dry density of soil expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry density of the same material, as determined by the ASTM D1557 laboratory compaction procedure. 121 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 20 All fill placed beneath improvements should meet this criterial. Fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in uncompacted thickness, moisture-conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction for fill thicknesses equal or less than five feet and 95 percent compaction for fill thicknesses greater than five feet. If imported clean sand or gravel (defined as soil with less than 10 percent fines) is used as backfill, it should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction regardless of fill thickness. Any imported soil will need to be meet any analytical testing requirements established by owner and the project environmental consultant. During construction, we should check that the on-site soil and/or any proposed import material is suitable for use as fill. Samples of all fill should be submitted to Langan for testing at least three business days prior to use at the site. A flowable cement grout, such as lean concrete or CDF, may also be used as backfill under most conditions, but we should be consulted prior to its use. 8.1.4 Utility Trenches The corrosivity test results provided in Appendix D should be reviewed and corrosion protection measures used to protect below-grade utilities, if needed. A corrosion engineer should be retained if corrosion recommendations are needed. Utility trenches should be excavated a minimum of four inches below the bottom of pipes or conduits and have clearances of at least four inches on both sides. Where necessary, trench excavations should be shored and braced, in accordance with all safety regulations, to prevent cave-ins. Backfill for utility trenches should be compacted according to the recommendations presented for the general site fill. Jetting of trench backfill is not permitted. To provide uniform support, pipes or conduits should be bedded on a minimum of four inches of sand or fine gravel. After pipes and conduits are tested, inspected (if required), and approved, they should be covered to a depth of six inches with sand or fine gravel, which should then be mechanically tamped or compacted with a vibratory plate. Backfill should then be placed as recommended for engineered fill. If any utility trenches will extend below the design groundwater elevation, sand, or gravel with less than 10 percent fines used as pipe bedding, shading, or cover should be wrapped in a filter fabric such as Mirafi 140NC. Special care should be taken in controlling utility backfilling in pavement areas. Poor compaction may cause excessive settlements, resulting in damage to exterior improvements. 122 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 21 8.2 Foundations BART Considerations As discussed in Section 7.2, the dead plus live (gravity) weight of the new building should be offset within the BART’s ZOI, such that the weight in the ground resulting from the future structure is the same as the weight that is currently present. To achieve this balance, we recommend overexcavating beneath the planned slabs located within the BART ZOI and placing lightweight material consisting of LCC or geofoam. The strength of lightweight material should be checked against the slab loads. In addition, where the footings are located within the BART ZOI, the passive and frictional resistance of any in-ground elements should be ignored (lateral resistance for the structure should be collected and designed to shed to the soil outside of the ZOI). As part of this design, where shallow foundations are within the BART ZOI, we recommend they be constructed with a permanent void or compressible material on any vertical faces of foundations within the ZOI so that there is no lateral load transfer from the new building to the soil within the ZOI. The void should be at least one inch wide. Conversely, if compressible material is used, it should consist of a weak compressible foam, such as Insulfoam EPS 12, and should be at least 6 inches wide. This void or compressible material should be placed along the vertical face of all footings within the BART ZOI. Foundation Design As discussed in Section 7.2, the proposed new buildings can be supported on continuous perimeter and isolated spread footings. The subsurface exploration indicates that low expansive soil is present at the site; therefore, the footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final soil subgrade and the perimeter footings should be continuous. Footings should be at least 18 inches wide for continuous footings and 24 inches for isolated spread footings. Footings adjacent to utility trenches (or other footings) should bear below an imaginary 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the utility trench (or adjacent footings). If footings bear above an imaginary 1.5:1 plane projected upward from the bottom edge of adjacent footing, then the adjacent footing should be designed for surcharge pressures from the footings founded above it. If this condition exists, we can compute the additional pressure increment. For the recommended minimum embedment, the footings bearing on firm native soil (or on properly designed lightweight material) may be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for dead plus live loads, with a one-third increase for total 123 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 22 loads, including wind and/or seismic loads. Anticipated foundation settlements associated with this allowable bearing capacity are discussed in Section 7.2 and total seismically induced settlements are discussed in Section 6.2.4. Foundation excavations should be free of standing water, debris, and disturbed materials prior to placing concrete. The bottoms and sides of the excavations should be moistened following excavation and maintained in a moist condition until the concrete is placed. We should check excavations prior to placement of reinforcing steel. If loose or disturbed material is observed in the excavation, it should be excavated to firm, competent material and replaced with lean concrete or engineered fill. Lateral forces on any building elements within the BART ZOI should be ignored. Lateral forces on shallow foundations bearing on native soil outside/beyond the BART ZOI can be resisted by a combination of friction along the base of the foundation and passive resistance against the vertical faces of the foundation. Frictional resistance should be computed using a base friction coefficient of 0.30, assuming the foundation is in contact with soil. To calculate the passive resistance against the vertical faces of the foundations, we recommend using lateral pressures corresponding to an allowable equivalent fluid weight (triangular distribution) of 270 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) in native soil. The upper foot should be ignored unless confined by a concrete slab or pavement. The values for the friction coefficient and passive pressures include a factor of safety of 1.5 and may be used in combination without reduction. 8.3 Floor Slabs The soil exposed at the bottom of foundation excavations and at floor slab subgrade is likely to consist of medium dense to dense clayey sand and medium stiff to very stiff clay and sandy clay. The floor slab may be designed to bear on grade, which is similar to the existing building’s floor slab design. Moisture is likely to condense on the underside of the floor slab, even though it will be above the design groundwater level. Consequently, a moisture barrier system should be considered if movement of water vapor through the slab would be detrimental to its intended use. A typical moisture barrier consists of a water vapor retarder and capillary moisture break. The moisture barrier should be placed directly beneath the slab. 124 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 23 The vapor retarder should meet the requirements for Class A vapor retarders stated in ASTM E1745, similar to 15mil Stego Wrap. The vapor retarder should be placed in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E1643. These requirements include overlapping seams by six inches, taping seams, and sealing penetrations in the vapor retarder. Beneath the vapor retarder, should be a capillary moisture break layer. Outside the BART ZOI, the moisture break should consist of at least four inches of clean, free-draining gravel or crushed rock. Where the slab is underlain by lighweight fill (within the BART ZOI), the typical gravel moisture break can be replaced with the lightweight fill consisting of either EPS geofoam or closed-cell LCC. The particle size of the gravel/crushed rock should meet the gradation requirements presented in Table 4. TABLE 4 Gradation Requirements for Capillary Moisture Break Sieve Size Percentage Passing Sieve Gravel or Crushed Rock 1 inch 90 – 100 3/4 inch 30 – 100 1/2 inch 5 – 25 3/8 inch 0 – 6 Concrete mixes with high water/cement (w/c) ratios result in excess water in the concrete, which increases the cure time and results in excessive vapor transmission through the slab. Therefore, concrete for the floor slab should have a low w/c ratio - less than 0.45. The slab should be properly cured. Before the floor covering is placed, the contractor should check that the concrete surface and the moisture emission levels (if emission testing is required) meet the manufacturer’s requirements. 8.4 Seismic Design Based on the results of the field investigation, including borings and shear wave velocity testing, the site is classified as a stiff soil site, Site Class D. A site-specific ground motion analysis is required for structures on Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, in accordance with the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and by reference ASCE 7-16, unless the criteria listed in the exception in Section 11.4.8 of ASCE 7-16 as modified by Supplement 3 of 125 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 24 ASCE 7-16 are met. We understand from the project structural engineer that these criteria will be met for the project. Therefore, for seismic design in accordance with the provisions of 2022 CBC/ASCE 7-16 and Supplement 3, we recommend the following: • Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) ground motion parameter spectral response acceleration (5% critical damping) for 0.2 seconds (Ss) and 1 second (S1) of 2.16g and 0.90g, respectively • Site Class D • Site Coefficients Fa and Fv of 1.0 and 1.7 , respectively • MCER and DE spectral response acceleration parameters at short periods, SMS and SDS, of 2.16g and 1.44g, respectively • MCER and DE spectral response acceleration parameters at one-second period, SM1 and SD1, of 2.28g and 1.52g, respectively (these values have been increased by 50% in accordance with ASCE 7-16 Supplement 3). 8.5 Excavations Where space permits, the sides of excavations can be sloped. Temporary excavation slopes should be no steeper than 1½:1 (horizontal to vertical) for soil above the groundwater table. Where space does not permit a sloped excavation and where excavations extend below five feet, excavations should be shored. 8.6 Pavement and Concrete Flatwork Design Our recommendations for flexible and rigid pavement and concrete flatwork are presented in this section. 8.6.1 Flexible and Rigid Pavement The State of California flexible pavement design method was used to develop the recommended asphalt concrete pavement sections. We expect the final soil subgrade in asphalt-paved areas will generally consist of on-site soil. On the basis of the laboratory test results, we selected an R-value of 10 for design. For our calculations, we assumed a Traffic Index (TI) of 4 for automobile parking areas with occasional trucks, and 5 and 6 for driveways and truck-use areas; these TIs should be confirmed by the project civil engineer. Table 5 presents our recommendations for asphalt pavement sections for these traffic indices. 126 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 25 TABLE 5 Flexible Pavement Sections Subgrade R-Value = 10 TI Asphaltic Concrete (inches) Class 2 Aggregate Base R = 78 (inches) 4 2.5 7 5 3 9 6 3.5 11.5 Where rigid pavement is required, for loading and service areas, we recommend a minimum of six inches of concrete for medium traffic (TI of 5.5 or lower) and a minimum of eight inches of concrete for heavy traffic (TIs of 6 and higher). The concrete should be underlain by at least six inches of Class 2 aggregate base. Pavement components should conform to the current Caltrans Standard Specifications. The subgrade should be prepared following the guidance in Section 8.1.2 to provide a smooth, non-yielding surface. The aggregate base should be moisture conditioned and compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent. Recycled aggregate base is acceptable provided it meets the Caltrans criteria for Class 2 material. The finished compacted aggregate base should be firm and unyielding and be proof rolled prior to placement of the pavement. If unstable areas are identified during proof rolling, or if the contractor is unable to achieve the recommended degree of compaction, the aggregate base in these areas should be removed in order to repair the underlying soil subgrade. In these areas the upper six inches of the soil subgrade should be moisture-conditioned to at or above optimum and compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. 8.6.2 Concrete Flatwork Exterior concrete flatwork should be underlain by at least four inches of aggregate base compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. The subgrade should be prepared following the guidance in Section 8.1.2 to provide a smooth, non-yielding surface. 127 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 26 8.7 Construction Monitoring BART could require monitoring of its structures for potential deformation caused by the proposed construction activities. BART monitoring requirements should be discussed with BART and incorporated into the construction monitoring program. 8.8 Site Drainage Positive surface drainage should be provided around the new buildings to direct surface water away from the new and existing structures. To reduce the potential for water ponding adjacent to the building, we recommend the ground surface within a horizontal distance of ten feet measured perpendicular to the face of the wall be designed to slope down and away from the building with a surface gradient of at least five percent in unpaved areas and two percent in paved areas in accordance with California Building Code (CBC) Section 1804.4. In addition, roof downspouts should be discharged into controlled drainage facilities to keep the water away from the building. Drainage control design should include provisions for positive surface gradients so that surface runoff is not permitted to pond, particularly adjacent to structures, or on roadways or pavements. 8.9 Bioretention Systems Bioretention areas are landscaping features used to treat stormwater runoff within a development site. They are commonly located in parking lot islands and landscape areas. Surface runoff is directed into shallow, landscaped depressions, which usually include mulch and a prepared soil mix. Typically, the filtered runoff is collected in a perforated underdrain beneath the bioretention system and returned to the storm drain system. For larger storms, runoff will generally overflow the bioretention areas and is diverted to the storm drain system. The soil within a bioretention system should typically have an infiltration rate sufficient to draw down any pooled water within 48 hours after a storm event. Bioretention soil should be installed in accordance with the San Mateo County’s C.3 stormwater technical guidelines. Because the soil subgrade beneath bioretention areas will likely be clayey sand and clay, which has a relatively low infiltration rate, an underdrain system with a waterproof liner on the sides and bottom of the bioretention swale should be installed. Underdrains are typically at the invert of the bioretention system to intercept water that does not infiltrate into the surrounding soils. Underdrains consist of a perforated PVC pipe surrounded by threat least two inches of Class 2 Permeable material (Caltrans Standard Specifications 128 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 27 Section 68-2.02F(3)). The perforated PVC pipe cross section area should be determined based on the desired hydraulic conductivity of the underdrain. Underdrains should be installed in accordance with the Santa Clara County’s C.3 stormwater technical guidelines. Overflow from bioretention areas should be directed to the storm drain system away from building foundations and slabs. If bioretention systems are closer than five feet to the face of buildings, passive resistance of foundation elements should be neglected. 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES DURING DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE During final design we should be retained to consult with the design team as geotechnical questions arise. Technical specifications and design drawings should incorporate Langan’s recommendations. When authorized, Langan will assist the design team in preparing specification sections related to geotechnical issues, if needed. Langan should also, when authorized, review the project plans, as well as Contractor submittals relating to materials and construction procedures for geotechnical work, to check that the designs incorporate the intent of our recommendations. Langan has investigated and interpreted the site subsurface conditions and developed the foundation design recommendations contained herein, and is therefore best suited to perform quality assurance observation and testing of geotechnical-related work during construction. The work requiring quality assurance confirmation and/or special inspections per the Building Code includes, but is not limited to, earthwork, backfill, and foundation installation. In fulfillment of these duties, during construction we should check foundation subgrade preparation and check compaction of utility trench backfill. We should also observe any fill placement and perform field density tests to check that adequate fill compaction has been achieved. Recognizing that construction observation is the final stage of geotechnical design, quality assurance observation during construction by Langan is necessary to confirm the design assumptions and design elements, to maintain our continuity of responsibility on this project, and allow us to make changes to our recommendations, as necessary. The foundation system and general geotechnical construction methods recommended herein are predicated upon Langan reviewing the final design and providing construction observation services for the owner. Should Langan not be retained for these services, we cannot assume the role of geotechnical engineer of record, and the entity providing the final design and construction observation services must serve as the engineer of record. 129 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 28 10.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations provided in this report result from our interpretation of the geotechnical conditions existing at the site inferred from a limited number of borings and CPTs. Actual subsurface conditions may vary. Recommendations provided are dependent upon one another and no recommendation should be followed independent of the others. Information on subsurface strata and groundwater levels shown on the logs represent conditions encountered only at the locations indicated and at the time of investigation. If different conditions are encountered during construction, they should immediately be brought to Langan’s attention for evaluation, as they may affect our recommendations. This report has been prepared to assist the Owner, architect, and structural engineer in the design process and is only applicable to the design of the specific project identified. Any proposed changes to the development concept should be brought to Langan’s attention as soon as possible so that we can determine whether such changes affect our recommendations. The information in this report cannot be utilized or depended on by engineers or contractors who are involved in evaluations or designs of facilities on adjacent properties which are beyond the limits of that which is the specific subject of this report. 130 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 29 REFERENCES 2014 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. (2015). “UCERF3: A new Earthquake Forecast for California’s Complex Fault System”, U.S. Geological Survey 2015–3009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/fs20153009. Aagaard, B. T., Blair, J. L., Boatwright, J., Garcia, S. H., Harris, R. A., Michael, A. J., Schwartz, D. P., and DiLeo, J.S . (2016). “Earthquake Outlook for the San Francisco Bay Region 2014–2043 (ver. 1.1, August 2016), U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2016–3020, 6 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/fs20163020 ASCE/SEI 7-16 (2016). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Bay Area Rapid Transit (2020). “BART Facilities Standards Design Criteria, Structural – Design and Construction Near Existing BART Structures,” issued December 2020. Bay Area Rapid Transit (2020). “BART Facilities Standards Design Criteria, Structural – Geo-Structures,” issued December 2020. Boulanger, R. W. and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures.” Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California at Davis, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01. April. Bray, J. D., and Sancio, R. B. (2006). “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils,” J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng., ASCE 123(9), 1167-1177. California Building Standards Commission, 2022 California Building Code. California Division of Mines and Geology (2008). “Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California.” Special Publication 117A. California Division of Mines and Geology (1996). “Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the State of California.” DMG Open-File Report 96-08. California Geologic Survey (2021). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Seismic Hazard Zones, San Francisco South Quadrangle, Official Map. 23 September 2021. California Geologic Survey (1982). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Earthquake Fault Zones, San Francisco South Quadrangle, Official Map. 1 January 1982. California Geologic Survey (2021). Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the San Francisco South 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, San Mateo County, California. California Geologic Survey (2021). Seismic Hazard Zonation of the San Francisco South Quadrangle, San Mateo County, California. 131 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 30 REFERENCES (Continued) Cao, T., Bryant, W. A., Rowshandel, B., Branum D. and Wills, C. J. (2003). “The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps.” Devcon Construction (2024). “Site Circulation Plan, Orange Park Clubhouse, Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula,” dated 20 November 2024. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2019). “Flood Insurance Rate Map, San Mateo County, California, Panel 43 of 510, Map Number 06081C0043F,” Effective April 5, 2019. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1954). “Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena.” Hanks, T. C., and W. H. Bakun (2008). “M-log A observations of recent large earthquakes.” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp 490-503. Idriss, I.M. and R.W. Boulanger (2008). “Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes,” EERI, MNO-12. IMEG Corp (2025). Email correspondence dated 28 February 2025. Ishihara, K. and Yoshimine, M. (1992). “Evaluation of Settlements in Sand Deposits Following Liquefaction during Earthquakes,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 173-188. Kier + Wright (2024). “Topographic Survey of 201 West Orange Avenue for Hunter Properties Inc., South San Francisco, California,” dated March 2024. Lienkaemper, J. J. (1992). “Map of recently active traces of the Hayward Fault, Alameda and Contra Costa counties, California.” Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2196. Pradel, D. (1998). “Procedure to Evaluate Earthquake -Induced Settlements in Dry Sandy Soils,” ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, 364-368. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District (2004). “San Francisco Airport Extension Line, Trackwork, and Systems, Plan and Profile, W2 357+00 to W2 369+00” dated 5 March 2004. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 97 (9), 1249-1273. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) (1999). “Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California.” State of California (2021). Tsunami Hazard Area Map, San Mateo County, produced by the California Geological Survey and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services. 132 Geotechnical Investigation 21 March 2025 Boys and Girls Clubs of The Peninsula – Orange Park Clubhouse 731788601 South San Francisco, California Page 31 REFERENCES (Continued) Tokimatsu, K. and Seed, H.B. (1987). “Evaluation of Settlements in Sand due to Earthquake Shaking.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, pp. 861-878. Toppozada, T. R. and Borchardt G. (1998). “Re-Evaluation of the 1836 “Hayward Fault” and the 1838 San Andreas Fault earthquakes.” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 88(1), 140-159. Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). “New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974-1002. Wesnousky, S. G. (1986). “Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California.” Journal of Geophysical Research, 91(1312). Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) (2008). “The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2.” Open File Report 2007-1437. Youd, T. L., and Garris, C. T. (1995). “Liquefaction-induced ground-surface disruption.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 121, 805-809. Youd, T. L., Hansen, C. M., and Bartlett, S. F., (2002). Revised Multilinear Regression Equations for Prediction of Lateral Spread Displacement, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, December. Youd, T. L., and Idriss, I. M. (2001). “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 4. Youngs, R. R., and Coppersmith, K. J. (1985). “Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75( ), 939-964. 133 FIGURES 134 Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-GI0102.dwg Date: 3/3/2025 Time: 14:56 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 1 Site Loc Approximate scale 0 2,000 Feet Notes: 1. Topographic basemap is provided through Langan’s Esri ArcGIS software licensing and ArcGIS online Copyright, National Geographic Society, i-cubed. 2. All features shown are approximate. 135 Main Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105 T: 415.955.5200 F: 415.955.5201 www.langan.com © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Langan CA, Inc. SITE 135 NEW BUILDING 3 NEW BUILDING 1EXISTING BUILDING 2GYMNASIUM MEMORIAL DRIVE A CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL B-1 CPT-1 B-2 CPT-2 Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG02-731788601-B-SP0101.dwg Date: 3/21/2025 Time: 11:56 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 2 Site Plan © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Langan CA, Inc. 135 Main Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105 T: 415.955.5200 F: 415.955.5201 www.langan.com Approximate scale 0 60 Feet Approximate location of boring by Langan, January 2025 Approximate location of cone penetration test by Langan, January 2025 Approximate limits of Existing One-Story Building Approximate limits of outer walls of BART subway box where in proximity of 201 West Orange Avenue Approximate limit of BART Zone of Influence at existing ground surface Approximate PG&E easement boundary Approximate location of idealized subsurface profile EXPLANATION B-1 CPT-1 Reference: Sheet A1.10 of plans by Devcon Construction Incorporated titled "Orange Park Clubhouse, Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula, 201 W Orange Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080," dated 12 March 2025. A'A A' 13 6 0 0 15SCALE IN FEET 15 Notes: 1. The above profile represents a generalized subsurface cross section interpreted from widely spaced borings. Soil deposits may vary in type, strength, and other important properties between points of exploration. 2. Approximate location of proposed structure is based on site plan provided by Devcon titled "Site Circulation Plan", dated 20 November 2024. 3. Approximate location of BART subway box is based on the San Francisco Airport Extension Line as-built drawing titled "San Francisco Airport Extension Line, Trackwork, and Systems, Plan and Profile, W2 357+00 to W2 369+00", provided by San Francisco BART District (2004). 4. All elevations referenced herein are based on "Topographic Survey of 201 West Orange Avenue for Hunter Properties Inc., South San Francisco, California", by Kier + Wright, dated March 2004 and reference North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-XS0101.dwg Date: 3/21/2025 Time: 12:43 User: agekas Style Table: Apple LaserWriter 8500.ctb Layout: A-A'© 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Langan CA, Inc. 135 Main Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105 T: 415.955.5200 F: 415.955.5201 www.langan.com Approximate groundwater level measured during drilling Legend: 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 EL E V A T I O N ( f t , N A V D 8 8 ) -30 B-2 CPT-2 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 EL E V A T I O N ( f t , N A V D 8 8 ) -30 Existing ground surface BAR T Z o n e o f I n f l u e n c e Existing One-story Building New Building 1(Proposed 2-Story Building At Grade) PG &E Easment A A' BART Subway ??? ??? (1/8/25) Outer Walls of BART Subway Box (1/8/25) SILTY SAND, CLAYEY SAND, SAND with SILT,SAND with CLAY, SAND, SAND with GRAVEL(SM, SC, SP-SM, SP-SC, SP, SW),dense to very dense [Colma Formation] Existing ground surfaceTop of slab BART Zoneof Influence ????? ???? Clay with Sand (CL) and Sandy Clay (CL),medium stiff to very stiff, and Clayey Sand (SC) Interbedden Sandy Clay (CL), Clayey Sand (CL),medium stiff to hard, and Sand with Silt (SP-SM),Sand with Clay (SP-SM), and Silty Sand (SM),medium dense Centennial WayTrail 137 Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-GI0102.dwg Date: 3/3/2025 Time: 14:57 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 4 FaultMap Approximate scale 0 20 km Magnitude 5 to 5.9 Magnitude 6 to 6.9 Magnitude 7 to 7.4 Magnitude 7.5 to 8 Earthquake EpicenterMagnitude © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n 135 Main Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105 T: 415.955.5200 F: 415.955.5201 www.langan.com Langan CA, Inc. SITE NOTES:1. QUATERNARY FAULT DATA DISPLAYED ARE PROVIDED BY THE CGS MAP SHEET 48:FAULT BASED SEISMIC SOURCES USED IN THE UNIFORM CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKERUPTURE FORECAST, VERSION 3 (UCERF3).2. EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER (MAGNITUDE) DATA QUERIED WITH A MAGNITUDE OF 5+FROM 01/01/1800 TO PRESENT, FROM THE ANSS COMPREHENSIVE EARTHQUAKECATALOG (COMCAT), DOWNLOADED 02/10/2025.3. BASEMAP AND COUNTY BOUNDARIES PROVIDED BY USGS AND CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.4. MAP DISPLAYED IN CALIFORNIA STATE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CALIFORNIA (TEALE)ALBERS, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), METERS. LEGEND County Boundary Fault Site Location 138 I Not felt by people, except under especially favorable circumstances. However, dizziness or nausea may be experienced. Sometimes birds and animals are uneasy or disturbed. Trees, structures, liquids, bodies of water may sway gently, and doors may swing very slowly.II Felt indoors by a few people, especially on upper floors of multi-story buildings, and by sensitive or nervous persons. As in Grade I, birds and animals are disturbed, and trees, structures, liquids and bodies of water may sway. Hanging objects swing, especially if they are delicately suspended. III Felt indoors by several people, usually as a rapid vibration that may not be recognized as an earthquake at first. Vibration is similarto that of a light, or lightly loaded trucks, or heavy trucks some distance away. Duration may be estimated in some cases. Movements may be appreciable on upper levels of tall structures. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.IV Felt indoors by many, outdoors by a few. Awakens a few individuals, particularly light sleepers, but frightens no one except thoseapprehensive from previous experience. Vibration like that due to passing of heavy, or heavily loaded trucks. Sensation like a heavybody striking building, or the falling of heavy objects inside. Dishes, windows and doors rattle; glassware and crockery clink and clash. Walls and house frames creak, especially if intensity is in the upper range of this grade. Hanging objects often swing. Liquids in open vessels are disturbed slightly. Stationary automobiles rock noticeably.V Felt indoors by practically everyone, outdoors by most people. Direction can often be estimated by those outdoors. Awakens many,or most sleepers. Frightens a few people, with slight excitement; some persons run outdoors. Buildings tremble throughout. Dishes and glassware break to some extent. Windows crack in some cases, but not generally. Vases and small or unstable objects overturn in many instances, and a few fall. Hanging objects and doors swing generally or considerably. Pictures knock against walls, or swing out of place. Doors and shutters open or close abruptly. Pendulum clocks stop, or run fast or slow. Small objects move, and furnishings may shift to a slight extent. Small amounts of liquids spill from well-filled open containers. Trees and bushes shake slightly.VI Felt by everyone, indoors and outdoors. Awakens all sleepers. Frightens many people; general excitement, and some persons runoutdoors. Persons move unsteadily. Trees and bushes shake slightly to moderately. Liquids are set in strong motion. Small bells in churches and schools ring. Poorly built buildings may be damaged. Plaster falls in small amounts. Other plaster cracks somewhat. Many dishes and glasses, and a few windows break. Knickknacks, books and pictures fall. Furniture overturns in many instances. Heavy furnishings move.VII Frightens everyone. General alarm, and everyone runs outdoors. People find it difficult to stand. Persons driving cars notice shaking. Trees and bushes shake moderately to strongly. Waves form on ponds, lakes and streams. Water is muddied. Gravel or sand stream banks cave in. Large church bells ring. Suspended objects quiver. Damage is negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary buildings; considerable in poorly built or badly designed buildings, adobe houses, old walls (especially where laid up without mortar), spires, etc. Plaster and some stucco fall. Many windows and some furniture break. Loosened brickwork and tiles shake down. Weak chimneys break at the roofline. Cornices fall from towers and high buildings. Bricks and stones are dislodged. Heavy furniture overturns. Concrete irrigation ditches are considerably damaged. VIII General fright, and alarm approaches panic. Persons driving cars are disturbed. Trees shake strongly, and branches and trunks break off (especially palm trees). Sand and mud erupts in small amounts. Flow of springs and wells is temporarily and sometimes permanently changed. Dry wells renew flow. Temperatures of spring and well waters varies. Damage slight in brick structures built especially to withstand earthquakes; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings, with some partial collapse; heavy in some wooden houses, with some tumbling down. Panel walls break away in frame structures. Decayed pilings break off. Walls fall. Solid stone walls crack and break seriously. Wet grounds and steep slopes crack to some extent. Chimneys, columns, monuments and factory stacks and towers twist and fall. Very heavy furniture moves conspicuously or overturns.IX Panic is general. Ground cracks conspicuously. Damage is considerable in masonry structures built especially to withstand earthquakes; great in other masonry buildings - some collapse in large part. Some wood frame houses built especially to withstand earthquakes are thrown out of plumb, others are shifted wholly off foundations. Reservoirs are seriously damaged and underground pipes sometimes break.X Panic is general. Ground, especially when loose and wet, cracks up to widths of several inches; fissures up to a yard in width run parallel to canal and stream banks. Landsliding is considerable from river banks and steep coasts. Sand and mud shifts horizontally on beaches and flat land. Water level changes in wells. Water is thrown on banks of canals, lakes, rivers, etc. Dams, dikes, embankments are seriously damaged. Well-built wooden structures and bridges are severely damaged, and some collapse. Dangerous cracks develop in excellent brick walls. Most masonry and frame structures, and their foundations are destroyed. Railroad rails bend slightly. Pipe lines buried in earth tear apart or are crushed endwise. Open cracks and broad wavy folds open in cement pavements and asphalt road surfaces.XI Panic is general. Disturbances in ground are many and widespread, varying with the ground material. Broad fissures, earth slumps, and land slips develop in soft, wet ground. Water charged with sand and mud is ejected in large amounts. Sea waves of significant magnitude may develop. Damage is severe to wood frame structures, especially near shock centers, great to dams, dikes and embankments, even at long distances. Few if any masonry structures remain standing. Supporting piers or pillars of large, well-built bridges are wrecked. Wooden bridges that "give" are less affected. Railroad rails bend greatly and some thrust endwise. Pipe lines buried in earth are put completely out of service.XII Panic is general. Damage is total, and practically all works of construction are damaged greatly or destroyed. Disturbances in the ground are great and varied, and numerous shearing cracks develop. Landslides, rock falls, and slumps in river banks are numerous and extensive. Large rock masses are wrenched loose and torn off. Fault slips develop in firm rock, and horizontal and vertical offset displacements are notable. Water channels, both surface and underground, are disturbed and modified greatly. Lakes are dammed, new waterfalls are produced, rivers are deflected, etc. Surface waves are seen on ground surfaces. Lines of sight and level are distorted. Objects are thrown upward into the air. 135 Main Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105 T: 415.955.5200 F: 415.955.5201 www.langan.com © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-GI0102.dwg Date: 3/3/2025 Time: 14:58 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 5 MM Scale Langan CA, Inc. 139 Approximate scale 0 2,000 Feet Reference: San Francisco South Quadrangle, Earthquake Fault Zones, Official Map Released: January 1, 1982.Seismic Hazard Zones, Official Map Released: September 23, 2021. EXPLANATION Earthquake-Induced Landslides; Areas where previous occurrence of landslide movement, or localtopographic, geological, geotechnical, and subsurface water conditions indicate a potential for permanentground displacements. Liquefaction; Areas where historic occurrence of liquefaction, or local topographic, geological, geotechnical, and subsurface water conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacements. 1 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 590San Jose, CA 95113 T: 408.283.3600 F: 408.283.3601 www.langan.com © 2 0 2 5 L a n g a n Filename: C:\bms\langan-pw-01\d0557443\FG01-731788601-B-GI0102.dwg Date: 3/3/2025 Time: 14:58 User: agekas Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: Figure 6 Haz Map Langan CA, Inc. SITE 140 APPENDIX E BART CRITERIA 141 CRITERIA STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 1 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA CONTENTS 1. SCOPE 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2.1. Policy 2.2. Clearance 2.3. Zone of Influence (ZOI) 2.3.1. Temporary Zone of Influence 2.3.2. Permanent Zone of Influence 2.4. Shoring 2.5. Groundwater Control and Dewatering 2.6. Existing Utilities 2.7. Pile Foundation 2.8. Construction Vibration 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING AT-GRADE AND AERIAL BART STRUCTURES 3.1. Falsework near BART Tracks 3.2. Construction Equipment 3.3. Soil Cover over Foundation 4. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING UNDERGROUND BART STRUCTURES 4.1. Surcharge Load for Existing Underground Structures 4.2. Excavation close to Underground Structures 4.3. Minimum Soil Cover 5. DOCUMENTATION 5.1. Design Documentation 5.2. Construction Documentation 142 CRITERIA STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 2 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA 1. SCOPE The purpose of the criteria herein is to establish minimum provisions for design and construction near existing BART structures. 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2.1. Policy New structures near existing structures shall be designed and constructed so as not to impose temporary or permanent adverse effects on existing BART structures. Potential impacts to the existing BART structures by new design and construction shall be identified at the planning stage of design. The Engineer Responsible for Design (ERD) shall coordinate the new design and construction with: • BART design criteria • Third-party design criteria • District third-party interagency agreements, as applicable Analyses of the existing structures are required when there are changes to the existing BART structures, or temporary or permanent changes to loading upon the existing BART structures due to the new design and construction. 2.2. Clearance The minimum clearance between any parts of the adjacent BART structures to exterior face of substructures shall be 7 feet 6 inches. In addition, the substructures shall be located such that the loads from the foundations of the new structures shall not impact the BART structures. 2.3. Zone of Influence (ZOI) 2.3.1. Temporary Zone of Influence For temporary effects on the existing BART’s structures, the temporary ZOI is defined as the area above a positive line of influence which is a line from the critical point of substructure at a slope of 1-1/2 horizontal to positive 1 vertical (line sloping towards ground level) or the area below a negative line of influence which is a line 143 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 3 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA from the critical point of substructure at a slope of 1-1/2 horizontal to negative 1 vertical (line sloping away from ground level). Refer to Figure 1 for an underground rectangular structure. The geotechnical engineer and ERD shall determine the critical points of the existing foundations and underground structures, subject to BART Engineering review and acceptance. 2.3.2. Permanent Zone of Influence The geotechnical engineer for the proposed structure shall determine the permanent effects or influence on the existing BART’s structures based upon the soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the proposed structures and the existing BART’s structures. Particular attention shall be paid to liquefiable soil, expansive soil, and lateral spreading. The slope of the permanent ZOI shall not be steeper than the slope of the temporary ZOI as defined above. 2.4. Shoring Shoring is required for excavation in the ZOI. Refer to Design Criteria, Structural, Geo-Structures. 2.5. Groundwater Control and Dewatering Where groundwater control is proposed, changes in groundwater elevation shall be evaluated together with the consequences to structures located in proximity to the dewatering. The groundwater drawdown zone shall be established based on a hydrogeologic study that includes, but is not limited to, soil types in proximity to the area of groundwater control, the duration of the work, the planned construction methods, and plans for recharge or other methods of groundwater control. Dewatering shall be monitored for changes in groundwater level. Recharging back to its original elevation is required if existing groundwater level is expected to drop more than 2 feet. 2.6. Existing Utilities Existing utilities shall be protected from damage. If relocation is necessary, it shall be accomplished in a manner that will not disrupt revenue service. 2.7. Pile Foundation Piles shall be pre-drilled to a minimum of 10 feet below the line of influence. Piles shall be driven in a sequence away from BART structures. BART structures shall be monitored for vibration during pile driving operations for all piles within 100 feet of the structures. 144 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 4 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA No pile shall be allowed between steel-lined tunnels. Steel-lined tunnels shall be monitored for movement and deformation. 2.8. Construction Vibration Some construction methods may result in vibrations that lead to densification of loose, cohesionless soil, or architectural and structural damage. A vibration monitoring plan shall be prepared to document the potential for induced vibration and noise from construction equipment and procedures, with respect to their effect on adjacent structures, BART facilities and operations. Procedures and control of vibration and settlement caused by the operations of construction equipment including, but not limited to, pile driving and soil compaction (vibro-compaction, etc.) shall be included in the plan. Plans shall include locations and details of monitoring instrumentation. The peak particle velocity (PPV) in the vertical direction as measured from the closest BART structures to the construction equipment shall not exceed 1.0 in/sec (transient source) and 0.5 in/sec (continuous/frequent intermittent source). For vibration-sensitive structures, the vibration limits are subject to District for review and acceptance. For structures supporting BART tracks, BART track movement shall be limited to a maximum of 1/4 inch per 30 feet of length in both horizontal and vertical directions. For other structures, the settlement shall not exceed 0.3 inches. For historic or sensitive structures, the ERD shall provide a structure specific settlement analysis for BART Engineering’s review and acceptance. Where the PPV is predicted to exceed 0.5 in/sec, or where historic or vibration-sensitive structures are known to be located, as identified by District, a pre-condition survey shall be conducted before the start of construction. The purpose of the pre-condition survey shall be to provide comprehensive documentation of existing building conditions, such as the location and extent of structural damage, cosmetic cracks, signs of differential settlement, or other conditions that could be affected by construction vibrations. Any existing structure located where the PPV is expected to exceed 0.5 in/sec shall be monitored for levels of vibration and the potential for vibration-induced settlement. Vibrations shall be monitored with a 3-component seismograph with geophones capable of recording 2 horizontal and 1 vertical ground motions. Settlement shall be monitored using survey targets and other remote settlement monitoring devices. The accuracy of the survey measurement shall be ±0.01 inches or better. Results of the vibration and settlement monitoring shall be provided in daily reports. Existing BART structures shall be monitored for vibration during pile driving operations for piles within 100 feet of said BART structures. When construction requires monitoring, construction activity resulting in monitored measurements in excess of limits within submitted plans acceptance by District, shall be immediately halted, and reported to BART Engineering for further direction. 145 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 5 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING AT-GRADE AND AERIAL BART STRUCTURES 3.1. Falsework near BART Tracks Falsework near BART tracks shall be designed as follows: A. Falsework shall be designed to resist seismic loads. For construction durations of less than 5 years, the seismic loads may be reduced to values defined in Caltrans MTD 20-2. For construction durations over 5 years, falsework shall be designed for seismic loads in accordance with applicable codes for permanent structures. B. Falsework shall be designed to resist wind loads. For construction durations of less than 180 days, the wind loads may be reduced to values defined in ASCE 37. For construction durations over 180 days, falsework shall be designed for wind loads in accordance with applicable codes for permanent structures. C. Falsework crossing under BART tracks without pedestrian traffic shall be designed according to the Caltrans Falsework Manual. D. Falsework crossing under BART tracks with pedestrian traffic shall be designed per item C above, including compliance with pedestrian protection according to CBC Section 3306. 3.2. Construction Equipment Construction equipment operating adjacent to BART’s Operating Envelope shall be situated and restrained such that it will not damage BART facilities, nor violate BART’s Operating Envelope. See Operating Envelop specified in Standard Specifications – Operating System Interface. 3.3. Soil Cover over Foundation Existing soil cover over foundations shall be maintained. 4. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING UNDERGROUND BART STRUCTURES 4.1. Surcharge Load for Existing Underground Structures In general, cut-and-cover underground structures were designed with an area surcharge applied at the ground surface both over and adjacent to the structures. The area surcharge was considered static uniform load with the following value: 146 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 6 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA D (ft) Average Vertical Surcharge Loading (psf) D>20 0 5<D<20 800-40D D<5 600 where D is the vertical distance from the top of the subway roof to the ground surface. In general, steel-lined tunnels were designed to support the weight of 35 feet of earth above the roof of the tunnel. Whenever the actual depth of cover is less than this amount, construction may be added imposing an additional average vertical loading of 120 lbs per square foot for each foot of depth of reduced cover. Where basements are excavated, the average vertical surcharge loading can be increased to the extent that it is balanced by the weight of the removed material. The effects of soil rebound in such cases shall be fully analyzed for each construction stage. 4.2. Excavation close to Underground Structures Excavation shall be done with extreme care to prevent damage to the waterproofing membrane and the structure itself. Hand excavation shall be performed for the final 1 foot to the underground structures. 4.3. Minimum Soil Cover Minimum soil cover of 8 feet on underground structures shall be maintained wherever possible. 5. DOCUMENTATION 5.1. Design Documentation The following is a list of minimum documentation required for design of structures near existing BART structures, subject to District review and acceptance: • Geotechnical Reports as required in Design Criteria, Structural, Geotechnical • Foundation plan showing the location of new foundations relative to the existing BART structure and foundations, and ZOI 147 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 7 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA • Foundation design calculations showing magnitudes and directions of foundation loads, how they are resisted through soils, and any interaction with the existing BART structure • Structural design calculations and drawings for foundation design loads • Excavation plan showing the ZOI, sequence of work, excavation slope, temporary shoring system, and permanent earth retaining systems, as applicable • Soil-structure interaction analysis report, if needed • Basis of structural design • Dewatering analysis and associated de-watering plans, if required • As-built construction drawings, if applicable 5.2. Construction Documentation The following is a partial list of the required construction documentation, subject to District review and acceptance: • Pre-construction planning report • Pre-conditions survey report • Field construction reports • Instrumentation plan • Dewatering monitoring and recharging plans • Dewatering monitoring report • Vibration monitoring plan • Vibration monitoring report • Monitoring plan for confirming incremental loads from new construction • Excavation plan for area within the ZOI showing the excavation slope or shoring system • Procedures and control of soil compaction operations 148 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RELEASE – R3.2 NEAR EXISTING BART STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 8 OF 8 DESIGN CRITERIA Figure 1 Temporary Zone of Influence – Underground Rectangular Structure END 149 CRITERIA STRUCTURAL GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCUTRES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 1 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA CONTENTS 1. SCOPE 2. DESIGN CODES 3. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING STRUCTURES 4. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING TRANSPORT DESIGN CATEGORY STRUCTURES 4.1. Shallow Foundations 4.2. Deep Foundations 5. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING BUILDING DESIGN CATEGORY STRUCTURES 5.1. Shallow Foundations 5.2. Deep Foundations 6. EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES (ERS) 6.1. Wall Type Selection 6.2. ERS Wall Design Requirements 7. SUPPORT AND UNDERPINNING OF EXISTING STRUCTURES 7.1. Planning for Shoring and Underpinning 7.2. Design Requirements 7.3. Shoring 150 CRITERIA STRUCTURAL GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCUTRES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 2 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA 1. SCOPE Criteria set forth in this section cover the structural design of foundations for structures, excluding tunnels and miscellaneous structures, which are addressed separately. These Criteria include structural design of earth retaining structure (ERS) walls, and supporting and underpinning of existing structures. The foundations, ERS walls, and underpinning support are collectively referred to as geo-structures. 2. DESIGN CODES Geo-structures shall be designed in accordance with Caltrans Bridge Design (CBD) as amended by these Criteria for structures belonging to Transport Design Category, and with California Building Code (CBC) as amended by these Criteria for structures belonging to Building Design Category. Geo-structures belonging to the Hybrid Design Category shall be designed according to the applicable Transport Design Category or the Building Design Category requirements herein. Requirements in Design Criteria, Structural, Passenger Stations and Buildings shall be used for determination of the applicable design basis for Hybrid Design Category Structures. If certain Geo-structure components involve both the Transport Design Category and the Building Design Category, then both sets of requirements shall apply. Where inconsistencies are noted amongst code and design requirements, the more conservative or stringent of the requirements shall be used. 3. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING STRUCTURES Acceptable foundations for structures include shallow and deep foundations, depending on geotechnical and groundwater conditions, types of loading, and site construction constraints at the development site. The foundation type and geotechnical design parameters shall be as recommended by the geotechnical engineer in the Geotechnical Engineering Report (GER). Foundation design shall take into account the presence of potentially corrosive substances in soils, if any, such as chlorides and sulphates. This may be accomplished by providing appropriate protection for concrete, reinforcement, and metal embedments. 151 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 3 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA 4. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING TRANSPORT DESIGN CATEGORY STRUCTURES The design of foundations supporting Transport Design Category structures shall be as directed by the provisions of CBD with the exceptions noted within this Article. Design Criteria, Structural, Geotechnical identifies limitations on differential settlements of foundations. 4.1. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS The design of foundations supporting Transport Design Category structures shall be as directed by the provisions of CBD. 4.2. DEEP FOUNDATIONS Acceptable deep foundations include driven piles and drilled shafts, including cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles, and cast-in-steel-shell (CISS) piles. Other types of deep foundations, such as helical piles and auger-cast piles (ACP) shall not be used for support of transport structures. In addition to CBD, the following provisions shall apply to the design of deep foundations supporting Transport Structures: A. Uplift shall not be allowed in any deep foundation where the uplift resistance is due to side friction, except for an intermittent uplift load from load combinations that include wind or extreme load combinations. B. Effects of downdrag loads (i.e., negative skin friction) shall be evaluated relative to the structural capacity of the deep foundation. Where methods are recommended for reducing effects of downdrag loads by means of a slip coating, consideration shall be given to the long-term value of residual negative skin friction that may develop. C. Batter piles shall not be farther out of plumb than 1 horizontal unit in 3 vertical units. Batter piles shall not encroach on property outside the right-of-way lines or interfere with existing structures or pile foundations. D. Batter piles shall not be used to resist extreme load combinations where reasonable alternatives are available. When foundations include batter piles which are not subject to extreme load combinations, the batter piles and any reacting vertical piles and their connections, shall be designed to remain elastic under factored demand forces, and factored pile axial forces are within permissible axial resistances per the GER. When foundations include batter piles and are reacting vertical piles subject to extreme load combinations, the piles and connections shall be capacity-protected, such that they remain elastic under the overstrength seismic forces that can be delivered by the structural system to the batter piles. E. The design shall consider nonlinear soil pressure-displacement relationships, soil-structure interaction (SSI), group action, and static and dynamic load conditions. 152 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 4 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA F. Appropriate corrosion protection shall be provided for steel piles, if selected for use, such that the pile has full required design strength at the end of the specified design life. 5. FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING BUILDING DESIGN CATEGORY STRUCTURES The design of foundations supporting Building Design Category structures shall be as directed by the provisions of CBC with the exceptions noted within this Article. 5.1. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Shallow foundations for building structures include spread footings for isolated columns, combined footings to support the load from more than one structural unit, strip footings for walls, and mats or rafts beneath an entire building area. Shallow foundations shall be sized and structurally designed in accordance with Section 1809 of CBC, to satisfy the allowable bearing pressures, settlement tolerances, and sliding resistances indicated in the GER. Shallow foundations supporting at-grade buildings shall be interconnected with continuous footings or reinforced concrete grade beams with or without slab on-grade or reinforced beams. In addition to the other applicable loadings, the structural elements interconnecting the shallow foundations shall be capable of carrying, in tension or compression, a force equal to the lesser of: the product of the larger shallow foundation or column design gravity load times the seismic coefficient, SDS, divided by 10, and 25 percent of the smaller shallow foundation or column gravity load. Seismic ties between shallow foundations shall comply with Section 1809.13 of CBC for all soil conditions. 5.2. DEEP FOUNDATIONS Deep foundations supporting Building Design Category structures shall be designed in accordance with Section 1810 of CBC. Deep foundation design shall include following. A. Uplift shall not be allowed in any pile where the uplift resistance is provided by side friction, except for an intermittent uplift load from load combinations that include wind or seismic load. B. Effects of downdrag loads (i.e., negative skin friction) shall be evaluated relative to the structural capacity of the deep foundation. Where methods are recommended for reducing the effect of downdrag loads by means of a slip coating, then consideration shall be given to the long-term value of residual negative skin friction that may develop. C. Batter piles shall not be farther out of plumb than 1 horizontal unit in 3 vertical units. Consideration shall be given to the possibility of such batter piles encroaching on property outside the right-of-way lines or interfering with existing structures or pile foundations. 153 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 5 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA D. Batter piles shall not be used where feasible alternatives are available. Where batter piles must be used, the batter pile and its connections, and any reacting vertical piles, shall meet requirements for batter piles in CBC Chapter 31F. E. The design shall account for nonlinear soil pressure-displacement relationships, SSI, group action, and static and dynamic load conditions. F. Appropriate corrosion protection shall be provided for steel piles, if selected for use, such that the pile has full required design strength at the end of the specified design life. 6. EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES (ERS) The criteria set forth in this Article govern the design of ERS including gravity and semi-gravity cantilever retaining walls, U-walls, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls, abutments walls for bridges, wing walls for bridges, and basement walls for building structures. Except as required in these Criteria, design shall be in accordance with CBD for ERS walls belonging to the Transport Design Category and with CBC for ERS walls belonging to the Building Design Category. When designing ERS that directly support appurtenances such as equipment supports, sign supports, parapets, railings, fences, walls, or barriers, design shall account for all possible externally applied loading on the ERS from the appurtenance, including vehicular collision, and design shall be in accordance with specified codes. When designing ERS where adjacent structures are not physically supported by the ERS but may result in a surcharge or other force transmission acting on the ERS, design shall account for the force transmission to the ERS and design shall be in accordance with the specified codes and these Criteria. When the ERS is potentially subjected to highway or BART or other train collision loading at the top of wall and a moment slab isolated from the ERS is proposed to provide the required crash protection, the moment slab shall be designed to appropriate standards. The ERS shall be designed for any incidental loading which may be transmitted either directly between the moment slab and the ERS or through the soil strata adjacent to the ERS. As a minimum, Article 11.10.10.2 in AASHTO/CA shall be used to determine vehicular collision loads. Refer to Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Design Bulletins for guidance on moment slab design. ERS design shall take into account the presence of potentially corrosive substances in soils, if any, such as chlorides and sulphates. This may be accomplished by providing appropriate protection for concrete, reinforcement, and metal embedment. 6.1. WALL TYPE SELECTION Wall type selection shall be based on siting, performance, and economic considerations as jointly recommended in the GER by the geotechnical engineer and agreed to by the Engineer Responsible for Design (ERD), with review and approval by BART Engineering. 154 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 6 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA A. U-walls (retaining walls with integrated continuous base slab between walls) shall be used where the top of trackway subgrade is below the groundwater table or flood level or in other locations where the ERD identifies the U-wall as being appropriate. U-walls shall be designed to resist earth pressures, hydrostatic pressures, and surcharge loads such as highway or railway traffic. U-walls shall be designed to support BART train loads on the base slab. B. Independent gravity and semi-gravity retaining walls may be used for trackway subgrade above the ground-water level. Either shallow or deep foundations are permissible for supporting independent gravity and semi-gravity retaining walls. Independent retaining walls shall be designed to resist earth pressures, hydrostatic pressures, and surcharge loads such as highway, BART train, or railway traffic. C. MSE retaining structures are permissible at locations where acceptable ground conditions exist or where ground can be improved to provide bearing support during gravity and seismic loading. Transport structures bridge approaches shall not be supported by shallow foundations located on MSE abutment walls, except in the configuration MSEA Type 2, Caltrans Memo-to-Designers 5-1. Use of MSE retaining structures shall be reviewed and approved by BART Engineering. D. For ERS wall taller than 25 feet, the type and design of ERS walls shall be reviewed and approved by BART Engineering. 6.2. ERS WALL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ERS walls and foundations for transport structures shall be proportioned to withstand the applicable loads and resistance factors as defined in provisions found in Sections 3 and 11 of AASHTO/CA. ERS walls and foundations for building structures shall be proportioned to withstand the applicable loads and factors as defined in Section 1807 of CBC. The following additional requirements apply for wall designs: A. For structures adjacent to operating railroads, both the vertical and lateral surcharge shall be based on Cooper’s E-80 railroad surcharge loadings. Refer to AREMA and other standards of the subject railway. B. When design includes level backfill, or when vehicular or BART train traffic can be located on the backfill near the face of the wall or abutment, a minimum live load surcharge in accordance with AASHTO/CA article 3.11.6.4 but not less than 2 feet of equivalent weight of earth shall be used. The potential need to design for higher live load surcharge shall be evaluated where heavy train loads or other temporary loads occur within the 1.5 of wall height distance. C. Lateral Earth Pressures: 1. Wall pressures shall be determined from values provided in the GER. 2. Deformation required to develop passive earth pressure shall be considered in design of walls that rely on passive earth pressure. The upper 2 feet of passive earth pressure shall be ignored in the computation of soil reaction. 155 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 7 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA D. Base Pressure and Stability ERS walls supported on shallow foundations shall be evaluated to confirm that bearing values are acceptable and that stability requirements are met, following provisions found in Sections 10 and 11 of AASHTO/CA for transport structures and in Sections 1809 and 1810 of CBC for Building Structures. 1. Soil-bearing pressures provided in the Design Criteria, Structural, Geotechnical shall be used. 2. The exposed face of the retaining walls supported on shallow foundations shall be initially offset towards the soil face. Refer to Standard Drawings, SS70, Structural Retaining Wall – Typical Elevation and Sections. E. U-walls and Buoyancy Effects 1. The effects of hydrostatic uplift pressure shall be accounted for whenever ground water is present. Maximum design flood levels shall be assumed based on 500-year flood elevations and future sea level rise shall be assessed and accounted for in selecting the design flood elevations. For the permanent condition, buoyancy shall be calculated for all locations. Resistance to buoyancy calculations shall rely on the dead weight of structural components and soil backfill with no account to any equipment or other removable items. Shear strength or friction of overburden shall not be considered. Unless otherwise allowed by District, the use of tiedowns, tension piles or other elements specifically designed to resist uplift forces is not permitted. 2. A minimum factor of safety of 1.1 shall be maintained when applied to the structural dead weight. For the short term (temporary) construction conditions, buoyancy shall be calculated for all construction phases and a minimum factor of safety of 1.05 shall be maintained. 7. SUPPORT AND UNDERPINNING OF EXISTING STRUCTURES The criteria set forth in this Article govern the design requirements for the support and underpinning of existing structures over or adjacent to existing or new BART facilities. Except as discussed herein, design shall be in accordance with CBD for support and underpinning of structures belonging to the Transport Design Category and with CBC for support and underpinning belonging to the Building Design Category. 7.1. PLANNING FOR SHORING AND UNDERPINNING A. The ERD, in coordination with BART Engineering shall investigate existing structures, that are to remain over, or adjacent to, the construction sites of existing or new BART facilities. Existing structures shall be protected and permanently supported and underpinned. When so stipulated by BART Engineering in the ERD’s scope of work, the ERD shall prepare contract document provisions and site-specific design criteria requiring the construction contractor to prepare the necessary designs. 156 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 8 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA B. Types of Support Systems The types of buildings and structures, that require support and underpinning include the following: 1. Buildings and structures extending over the BART structures to such an extent that they must be temporarily supported during construction and permanently underpinned. 2. Buildings and structures immediately adjacent to the BART structures that require temporary support during construction. 3. Building and structures that may be affected by groundwater lowering. In certain areas, uncontrolled lowering of the groundwater for BART construction may cause settlement of buildings either adjacent to or at some distance from BART excavations. 4. Other buildings, structures, and utilities, that BART Engineering deems appropriate, shall be included in the scope. 7.2. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A. Underpinning walls or piers that support transport or buildings structures, and form a portion of the excavation support system shall extend to a minimum depth identified in the GER. B. Methods used to protect or underpin structure shall account for the site-specific soil and groundwater conditions and include the following: 1. A bracing system shall be tight for the effectiveness of underpinning and for protection wall support. In addition to the general requirements for support of excavations, which are provided in the specifications, the ERD shall indicate requirements for the installation and removal of the temporary bracing systems that relate to the designs of underpinning and protection walls, such as the levels of bracing tiers, the maximum distances of excavation below an installed brace, and the amount of preloading. The ERD shall require through the contract documents that detailed design of the temporary bracing system be the responsibility of the construction contractor, based on overall criteria to be included in the contract documents. 2. If soil and groundwater conditions, structure size, or proximity to an excavation dictate piers, piles, or caissons for underpinning of an existing structure, such piers, piles, or caissons shall extend at least 10 feet below the line of influence or into a competent soil or rock layer, whichever is deeper, as shown in Figure 1, unless the geotechnical engineer shows that vertical and horizontal support requirements can be developed at less than 10 feet below the line of influence. The minimum depth of underpinning below the line of influence shall be 2 feet. 3. Other geotechnical considerations as outlined with Design Criteria, Structural, Geotechnical. 157 GEO-STRUCTURES RELEASE – R3.2 STRUCTURAL – GEO-STRUCTURES BART FACILITIES STANDARDS ISSUED: DECEMBER 2020 PAGE 9 OF 9 DESIGN CRITERIA 7.3. SHORING Shoring is required for excavations in the temporary and permanent zone of influence, as defined in Design Criteria, Structural, Design and Construction Near Existing BART Structures. A. Seismic and wind loads shall be accounted for in the shoring design for temporary and permanent shoring. The seismic and wind loading shall be defined as follows: 1. Seismic earth pressures shall be determined by the geotechnical engineer based on the site-specific seismicity for permanent shoring systems. 2. For temporary structures with an expected duration of less than 5 years, the site seismicity shall be based on a probabilistic ground motion with 10 percent probability of exceedance in 10 years. The seismic earth pressure coefficient (kh) shall not be less than 0.1g. 3. For temporary structures with an expected duration of over 5 years, the seismic loading for permanent retaining structures shall be used. 4. For structures to be shored for 5 years or less, wind loading and design shall be in accordance with Section 6.2 of ASCE/SEI 37. 5. For structures to be shored for over 5 years, wind loading and design shall be in accordance with applicable codes for permanent structures. B. Shoring shall maintain at-rest soil conditions and monitored for movement. C. Soil re-distribution caused by temporary shoring or existing foundation system shall be analyzed. D. Shoring support shall extend at least 10 feet below the base of the excavation or into a competent soil or rock layer, whichever is deeper, unless the geotechnical engineer shows that vertical and horizontal support requirements can be developed at less than 10 feet below the excavation depth. The minimum depth of shoring below the excavation depth shall be 2 feet. Figure 1: Underpinning Support Requirements END 158 DISTRIBUTION Electronic Copy: Mr. James K. Harris Vice President of Operations Boys and Gils Clubs of the Peninsula 401 Pierce Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 159 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix C Phase I ESA for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula AST Inc. Geotechnical, February 2025 160 “CONFIDENTIAL AND PREVILEGED” Inc. Geotechnical | Environmental | Consulting Engineers | Construction Services PHASE I | ESA PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT BOYES AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 201 W.ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: JENNY OBIAYA C/O BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA 401 PIERCE ROAD MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025 AST FILE NO.: 25273-ESA DATED: FEBRUARY 2025 161 ADVANCE SOIL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Engineers | Geologists | Environmental Consultants & Construction Services 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 95128 Office: (408)-261-1155 | Fax: (408)-261-1588 File No. 25273-ESA February 28, 2025 Jenny Obiaya C/O Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula 401 Pierce Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Subject: PHASE I ESA An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula Designated Assessor Parcel Nos. 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 201 W. Orange Avenue South San Francisco, California Dear Jenny - Advance Soil Technology, Inc. (“AST”) is pleased to present herein the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) report for the subject property consisting of two parcels of land (093-331-110) & (093-331-150) located at the physical address of 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The subject property is presently occupied with three one to two-story concrete and block-wall structures with associated paved driveway, parking lots, and landscaped areas. The property encompasses approximately (±3.0)-acres of land with the following designated Assessor Parcel Nos. 093-331-110 & 093-331-150, surrounded by park, school, residential developments and church. This assessment was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in the ASTM Practice E1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process and the terms of the Contract Proposal Titled Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. This assessment included a site reconnaissance of the subject property and vicinity, as well as research and interviews with representatives of the public, property ownership, site manager and regulatory agencies. Based on the above available and provided information, an assessment was made, conclusions were stated and recommendations were outlined. 162 PHASE I ESA| Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you as receiver/user of this report. After the review, if you have any questions concerning this report, or/ require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, ADVANCE SOIL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Al Mirza Alex Kassai Al Mirza Alex A. Kassai PE/REA Project Engineer Principal Am/aak PE #34882 Cc: file 163 “CONFIDENTIAL AND PREVILEGED” Inc. Geotechnical | Environmental | Consulting Engineers | Construction Services PHASE I | ESA PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AN EXISITNG BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 201 W. ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: JENNY OBIAYA C/O BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA 401 PIERCE ROAD MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025 AST FILE NO.: 25273-ESA DATED: FEBRUARY 2025 AST declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the undersigned meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. AST has developed and performed the all-appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Al Mirza Alex Kassai Al Mirza Alex A. Kassai PE Project Engineer Principal Engineer (PE #34882) Am/aak Cc: File 164 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 4 AST conducted a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21, AAI, and the Contract Proposal for Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) report for the subject property located at 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The above-mentioned property is located at the northwest corner of Memorial Drive and W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California with APNs 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 and will be referred to as the “Subject Property” from here on in the following sections of this report. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report. This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula as the receiver of this report, with an assessment concerning environmental conditions at the site (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property. SITE DESCRIPTION AST reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps provided by EDR for the Target Property information also known as the “Subject Property”. The subject property was identified in San Francisco South Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic maps with approximate co-ordinates of Latitude 37.652052° N and Longitude -122.427926° W respectively. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, ground surface elevations at the subject property is approximately (±33.32)- feet above mean sea level (msl). The subject property is located on flat terrain, and so are the surrounding areas and the general vicinity. Ground-water elevations in the vicinity of the subject property appear to fluctuate on the order of (±15) to (±23)-feet below the existing ground surface on an annual basis, due to natural recharge and discharge of the aquifers that occurs with changing seasons and the amount of rainfall. Groundwater flow direction may also be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. Based on the review of the topographic maps and the GEOCHECK Report provided by EDR, the general groundwater elevation in the area, depth to the high-water table is anticipated at the approximate depth of (±15.7)-feet below existing ground surface (bgs) with general topographic gradient being in the east-northeast direction. The closest/nearest surface water body in vicinity of the subject property is Colma Creek, which is located approximately (±750)-feet to the east of the subject property. As mentioned above, the subject property being considered for this Phase I ESA is located at the northwest corner of Memorial Drive and W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The subject property is located in a commercial/residential part of City of South San Francisco, surrounded by residential, school, and park developments. It consists of a two parcels of land with assessor parcel numbers (APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) with an approximate gross area of (3.0)-Acres. The subject property is occupied by three one to two-story concrete structures with asphalt paved driveway and parking lots. It has been utilized as student campus in the past and at the present time, it is presently occupied by Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula. For additional information pertaining to the parcels, please refer to Plate 1: Site Location Map, Plate 2: Topographic Map, Plate 3: Vicinity Site Usage, Plate 4: Parcel Map, Plate 5: One-mile Radius Map, and Plate 6: FEMA Map. Please refer to Appendix “A” and “E” of this report for site information and photographs. 165 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 5 The subject property is located in a commercial/residential part of City of South San Francisco, surrounded mostly with commercial and residential developments and their respective paved parking areas. The subject property is a combination of two an irregular shaped parcels of land with a designated APNs 093-331-110 and 093-331-150 and approximately (±3.0 acre), currently used as Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula. The subject property is bond to the north by C Street, to the east by the existing Orange Memorial Park, on the southwest by the existing Good News Chapel, and to the south by W. Orange Avenue. Subject property and a chronological summary of historical usage of the property has been presented in the Table below: TABLE I - SITE INFORMATION Property Owner: City of South San Francisco Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 No. Parcels: 2 Property Addresses: 201 W. Orange Avenue | Menlo Park, California Property Location: North Side of Orange Avenue Total Land Acreage (acres): 3.0-Acres(approx.) Past Usage of the Property: Commercial Date of Construction: 1960’s Type of Construction: Concrete Buildings Number of Structures: 3 Number of Units: Not Applicable Number of Stories: One to Two-Story Basement or/ Subgrade Areas: No Basement Other Improvements: Paved Parking Current Operation On-Site/Use: Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula Current Use of Hazardous Substances: None Identified Regulatory Database Listing: HAZNET, HWTS 166 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 6 TABLE II – CITY DIRECTORY (HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION) Year Target Property - Vicinity Source 2020 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club-N San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park EDR Digital Archive 2017 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club of America /Club of SSF Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2014 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco Boys & Girls Club of SSF Vicinity-Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2010 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2005 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo County Vicinity- Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2000 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Hoch, Shirlee J Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 1995 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 1992 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 1986 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1981 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 167 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 7 1976 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1970 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS According to ASTM Standard of Practice E1527-21, recognized environmental conditions (REC) fall under three specific categories when evaluating a site or properties within the site vicinity. These categories are defined below. Recognized Environmental Condition (REC)- (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. AST did not identify any RECs during the course of this assessment. Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) A controlled recognized environmental condition, or CREC, is a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of controls. AST did not identify an existing CREC during the course of this assessment. Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) A historical recognized environmental condition, or HREC, is a a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities, without subjecting the property to any controls (for example activity and use limitations, or other property use limitations). AST did not identify an existing HREC during the course of this assessment. Other Environmental Considerations (OEC) warrant discussion, but do not qualify as RECs as defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21. These include, but are not limited to, de minimis conditions and/or environmental considerations such as the presence of ACMs, LBP, radon, mold, and lead in drinking water, which can affect the liabilities and financial obligations of the client, the health and safety of site occupants, and the value and marketability of the subject property. Regardless of construction date of the building, the EPA’s NESHAP requires that an asbestos survey adhering to AHERA sampling protocol be performed prior to demolition or renovation activities that may disturb ACMs. This requirement may be enforced by the local agency enforcing the federal EPA regulations. The NESHAP regulation specifies that all suspect ACMs be sampled to determine the 168 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 8 presence or/ absence of asbestos prior to any renovation or demolition activities to prevent potential exposure to workers and/or building occupants. Based on the potential presence of ACMs, AST recommends the property owner develop and implement an Operation and Maintenance Plan for the subject property which stipulates the identification, assessment, repair and maintenance of building materials to protect the health and safety of the building occupants, visitors to the site, and the environment. Due to the age of the building at the subject property, there is a potential that LBP may be present on the subject property. AST recommends that the property owner consult with a certified Lead Risk Assessor to determine options for control of possible LBP hazards. Stringent local and State regulations may apply to LBP in association with building demolition/renovations and worker/occupant protection. It should be noted that construction activities that disturb materials or paints containing any amount of lead may be subject to certain requirements of the OSHA lead standard contained in 29 CFR 1910.1025 and 1926.62. 169 TABLE OF CONTENT PHASE I ESA | Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA |page 9 SECTION PAGE Front Page 1 Cover Letter 2-3 Cover Page - Executive Summary 4-8 Table of Contents 9-11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 12 1.1 Purpose 12-13 1.2 Involved Parties 13 1.3 Scope of Work 13 1.4 Assumptions 13 1.5 Limitations 14 1.6 User Reliance 14 1.7 Limiting Conditions 15 1.8 Data Failures 15 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 15 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description 16 2.2 Current Property Use 17 2.3 Current Use of Adjoining Properties 17 3.0 Physical Setting Sources 17 3.1 Topography 17 3.2 Hydrology 18 3.3 Regional Geology/Soils 18-20 3.4 Wetlands & Flood Zone Information 19 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 19-20 4.1 On-Site Storage Tanks 20 4.2 Identified Hazardous Materials 20 4.3 Asbestos Containing Materials 20 4.4 Lead Based Paints 20 4.5 Poly Chlorinated Biphenyls 21 4.6 Radioactive Man-Made Materials 21 4.7 Pits, Ponds & Lagoons 21 4.8 Septic Tanks & Cesspools 21 4.9 Wells, Cisterns & Sumps 21 4.10 Wastewater Interceptors/Grease Interceptors 29 4.11 Drinking Water 21-22 4.12 Radon 22 4.13 Pesticides & Herbicides 22 170 TABLE OF CONTENT PHASE I ESA | Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA |page 10 SECTION PAGE 5.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION 22-23 5.1 Aerial Photograph Review 23-24 5.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance (Sanborn) Maps 24 5.3 City Directories 25-26 5.4 Historical Topographic Maps 26-27 5.5 Building Permit Report 27 5.6 Historical Oil & Gas Maps 27 5.7 Environmental Liens 27 5.8 Vapor Encroachment Concerns 27-28 5.9 Client Supplied Reports 28-29 5.10 Interviews 30 5.10.1 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators & Occupants 30 6.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 31 6.1 Assessor’s Office 31 6.2 Building / Planning / Public Works Department 31 6.3 Fire Department 31 6.4 Department of Toxic Substance Control 32 6.5 Regional Water Quality Control Board 32 6.6 Oil & Gas Exploration 32 6.7 Mapped Database Records Search 32-34 6.7.1 Target Property 35 6.9.2 GEOTRACKER & ENVIROSTOR Database 35-36 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 36-37 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 37-38 9.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 39 10.0 REFERENCES 39 Appendix A Plate 1 Site Location Map Plate 2 Topographic Map Plate 3 Parcel Map Plate 4 Vicinity Site Usage Plate 5 One-Mile Radius Map Plate 6 FEMA Map 171 TABLE OF CONTENT PHASE I ESA | Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA |page 11 SECTION PAGE Appendix B Reports Provided By EDR Appendix C Owner Questionnaire Preliminary Title Report Appendix D EDR Building Permits Documents from Research Appendix E Photographs of Subject Property Appendix F Qualifications 172 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 12 PHASE I ESA PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AN EXISTING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA Designated Assessor Parcel Nos. 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisco, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION AST conducted a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21, AAI, and the Contract Proposal for Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) report for the above-mentioned property APNs 093-331-110 and 093-331-150 located at the physical address of 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California and will be referred to as the “Subject Property”. Any exceptions to or/ deletions from this scope of work are described in the report. The subject property is comprised of two parcels of land with a designated Assessor's Parcel Nos. 093-331-110 & 093-331-150. The subject property is encompassing an area of approximately (3.0)- acres of land and is occupied by three one to two story structures and paved driveway and parking areas. 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this ESA was to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-21) affecting the subject property that: 1)Constitute or/ result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicableenvironmental law; 2)Impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or/ require a material change in the use thereof; 3)Require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4)May affect the value of the subject property; and 5)May require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1)The associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property; and or/ 2)Determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the purchase of the property, sale, loan origination, or/ the seller financing of the subject property. This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or/ bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or/ “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E-1527- 173 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 13 21 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B). 1.2 INVOLVED PARTIES The involved party in this Phase I ESA of the subject property to the best of our knowledge, is Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula (User and Receiver of the report). AST recognizes that this report is to be used exclusively by Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula and their successors, lenders, assigns and financial institutions and can be relied upon by them for such purpose. 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard of Practice E1527-21, AAI, and the Contract Proposal Phase I ESA and the standards of care and due diligence normally practiced by recognized consulting firms in performing services of a similar nature. This assessment included the following: Reconnaissance of the subject property to verify current site conditions, and look for visible evidence of previously disposed and/or currently present hazardous waste, surface contamination, underground and above ground storage tanks (USTs/ASTs), suspect polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and other potential environmental hazards Conducted a visual survey of the adjacent properties and the immediate vicinity to determine if any nearby sites pose a significant environmental impact to the subject property Reviewed currently and readily available public documents, including maps, aerial photographs, governmental databases of known hazardous waste sites and underground tanks, other consultant reports (if any), fire insurance maps, and other accessible Prepared a Phase I report, inclusive of our findings and recommendations, with applicable illustrations and documentation Consulted with appropriate governmental agencies having jurisdiction relative to history of the subject property, complaints or incidents in the immediate area, and permits that may have been issued in the past Conducted the Phase I in compliance with the All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) Final Rule published in 40 CFR Part 312. The scope of services outlined above is generally considered sufficient to properly assess the Subject Property based on the data search, reasonably ascertainable documents, and site reconnaissance. 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS AST made the following assumptions for the preparation of this Phase I ESA Report. AST assumed that all the information, documents and environmental reports prepared by others are accurate and complete. Furthermore, we assume that the information provided in the questionnaire and by the parties interviewed is accurate and true to the best of their knowledge. AST did not verify the accuracy of the information and the received documents. 174 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 14 1.5 LIMITATIONS The findings and conclusions by AST contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies utilized and set-forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting a Phase I of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. The Client understands that no Phase I can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) to be present at the subject property. This Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, the uncertainty regarding potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions. AST believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is considered to be substantially reliable. AST acquired environmental database of selected publicly available information for the general area of the subject property and cannot verify the accuracy and completeness of the database or/ obligated to identify mistakes or/ insufficiencies in the information provided (ASTM E1527-21, Section 8.1.3). Due inadequate address information the environmental database may have mapped several sites inaccurately or/ could not map the facilities. Releases from these facilities if nearby, could impact the site. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations and are valid for 180-days. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or/ expressed. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon the review of the owner questionnaire(s), personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records; and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. This practice does not address requirements of any state or/ local laws or/ of any federal laws other than the “All Appropriate Inquiry” provisions of the LLPs. Furthermore, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property. Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I as defined by ASTM, include the following: ACMs, LBP, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in the following sections. 1.6 USER RELIANCE All reports, both verbal and written, are for the sole use and benefit of Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula as the user of this report. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity. 175 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 15 1.7 LIMITING CONDITIONS The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E1527-21. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below: Interviews with past owners, operators and occupants were not possible and thus constitutes a data gap. Based on information obtained from other historical sources (as discussed in Section 3.0), this data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this assessment. AST was unable to determine the property use at five-year intervals, which constitutes a data gap. Information concerning historical use of the subject property was unavailable from 1897-2024 in five-year intervals and thus constitutes a data gap. This data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this assessment. AST was not provided the chain-of-title information by the Client during the course of this Phase I ESA. However, a search for environmental liens by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) revealed no such environmental liens associated with the subject property. Based on the above, with respect to these data gaps, AST believes that the most significant potential sources for on-site contamination have been identified during the current assessment. A data gap is a lack of or inability to obtain information required by ASTM E1527-21 despite the good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. A data gap by itself is not inherently significant; it becomes significant only if it raises reasonable concerns. 1.8 DATA FAILURES As described by ASTM E1527-21, a data failure occurs when all the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful have been reviewed and yet the objectives have not been met. Data failures are not uncommon when attempting to identify the use of a site at five-year intervals back to the first use or to 1897 (whichever is earlier). ASTM Standard Designation E1527-21 requires the environmental assessor/professional to comment on the significance of data failures and whether the data failure affects the ability to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions. A data failure by itself is not inherently significant; it becomes significant only, if it raises reasonable concerns. AST did not encounter any data failures during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property being considered for this Phase I ESA is located at 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. As mentioned above in Section 1.0, the subject property consists of two parcels of land with an assessor parcel numbers (APNs 093-331-110 and 093-331-150) with an approximate gross area of (3-Acres). At the present time, the Subject Property is being utilized as student campus by Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula. The description and information reflected above is based on the review of the Assessor's Parcel Map, Grant Deed, site reconnaissance and other miscellaneous documents that were provided to our office. 176 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 16 2.1 SITE LOCATION & LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PARCEL Subject Property: The subject property is located in a commercial/residential part of City of South San Francisco, surrounded mostly with commercial and residential developments and their respective paved parking areas. The subject property is a combination of two an irregular shaped parcels of land with a designated APNs 093-331-110 and 093-331-150 and approximately (±3.0 acre), currently used as Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula. The subject property is bond to the north by C Street, to the east by the existing Orange Memorial Park, on the southwest by the existing Good News Chapel, and to the south by W. Orange Avenue. TABLE I - SITE INFORMATION Property Owner: City of South San Francisco Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 No. Parcels: 2 Property Addresses: 201 W. Orange Avenue | Menlo Park, California Property Location: North Side of Orange Avenue Total Land Acreage (acres): 3.0-Acres(approx.) Past Usage of the Property: Commercial Date of Construction: 1960’s Type of Construction: Concrete Buildings Number of Structures: 3 Number of Units: Not Applicable Number of Stories: One to Two-Story Basement or/ Subgrade Areas: No Basement Other Improvements: Paved Parking Current Operation On-Site/Use: Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula Current Use of Hazardous Substances: None Identified Regulatory Database Listing: HAZNET, HWTS For additional information pertaining to the parcels, please refer to Plate 1: Site Location Map, Plate 2: Topographic Map, Plate 3: Vicinity Site Usage, Plate 4: Parcel Map, Plate 5: One-mile Radius Map, and Plate 6: FEMA Map. Please refer to Appendix “A” and “E” of this report for site information and photographs. 177 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 17 2.2 CURRENT PROPERTY USE At the time of this Phase I site assessment, the subject property was used as a student campus for the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula. Access to the site is from a driveway on the east side of the subject property. Based on the review and research of the documents at the City of South San Francisco, information from the Owner Questionnaire and the reports and research documents provided by Environmental Data Resources (EDR), it is our understanding that the subject property has been used for Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula dating back to 1960. However, based on the review of the Regulatory Database Reports provided by Environmental Data Resources (EDR), it is our understanding that the subject property has been identified and listed in the HAZNET (The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC) and HWTS (DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility). Forty five tons of asbestos containing building material was hauled off from the site and deposited in the landfill facility. However, no violations were reported or/associated with the subject property at the time of this Phase I Site Assessment. Please refer to the following section of this report for a detail discussion. 2.3 ADJACENT PROPERTIES As previously mentioned, the subject property is located within the residential / commercial part of City of South San Francisco. The subject property is bond to the north by C Street, to the east by the existing Orange Memorial Park, on the southwest by the existing Good News Chapel, and to the south by W. Orange Avenue. 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING The physical settings for the site are based on the review of the USGS/CGS geological maps San Francisco South, 7.5 Quadrangle and reports and the discussion is as follows: 3.1 TOPOGRAPHY The United States Geological Survey (USGS), San Francisco South 7.5-minute series topographic map was reviewed for this Phase I investigation. The subject property is located at the approximate co- ordinates of Latitude 37.652052° N and Longitude -122.427926° W respectively. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, ground surface elevations at the subject property is approximately (±33.32)-feet above mean sea level (msl). The area in general is slightly sloping toward east-northeast so is the properties in the area. The subject property is located on southwest corner of Memorial Drive and West Orange Avenue. The physical address assigned to the subject property is 201 W. Orange Avenue, South San Francisco, California. Based on our review of the existing FEMA electronic floodplain data (Federal Emergency Management Agency), the subject property is located in an area of minimum flood hazard zone (06081C0043F dated 4/5/2019). No flood hazard analysis has been conducted by us for the subject property. Flood insurance rates are commensurate with the uncertainty of the flood risk. Review of the contour map provided by EDR indicates that the subject property is relatively flat. Please refer to Figure 2: Topographic Map. 178 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 18 3.2 HYDROLOGY Historically, natural hydrologic processes and human activities can cause ground-water levels to fluctuate through time. Therefore, it is impossible to predict depths to saturated soils during future earthquakes. One method of addressing time-variable depth to saturated soils is to establish an anticipated high ground-water level based on historical ground-water data. In areas where ground water is either currently near-surface or could return to near-surface levels within a land-use planning interval of 50 years, California Geological Survey (CGS) constructs regional contour maps that depict these levels. In some areas with low precipitation, such as Antelope Valley, records may indicate that near surface ground water existed during historical time, but withdrawal and low recharge rates preclude a return to those conditions within 50 years. For these areas, the historically highest ground-water level is not used to establish the anticipated depth to saturated soil for hazard evaluation. For these and all other areas, CGS delineates present or/ anticipated near-surface saturated soils caused by locally perched water and seepage from surface-water bodies. It shall be noted that the future initiation of large-scale, artificial recharge programs could result in a significant rise in ground-water levels over 50 years. When alerted of such programs, CGS will evaluate their impact relative to liquefaction potential and revise official seismic hazard zone maps, if necessary. California State Water Resources Control Board. The depths to first-encountered unconfined ground water were plotted onto a map of the project area and contoured to constrain the estimate of historically shallowest ground water. Water depths from boreholes known to penetrate confined aquifers were not used. Based on seismic hazard report SHZ 133, for the San Francisco South 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, the historical groundwater elevation ranges from (10)-to (20)-feet below the ground surface. Recent geotechnical investigation (Draft findings dated 1/24/2025 by Langan Engineering), depth to first- encountered water) ranged from (14) to (23)–feet below the ground surface during and after drilling. Based on the information provided by EDR, ground water flow direction is to the north- northeast. The closest bodies of water to the subject property appears to be the Colma Creek located to the southeast of the subject property at a distance of approximately (±750)-feet. 3.3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY Geologically, the site under evaluation is located within the physiographic region known as the San Francisco Bay Area, which itself lies within the Coast Range geomorphic province of California, which consists of a series of northwest trending mountains and valleys along the western edge of the North American Continent. The San Francisco Bay Area itself lies within the Coast Range Geomorphic Province, a more or less discontinuous series of northwest trending mountain ranges, ridges, and intervening valleys characterized by complex folding and faulting. Geologic and Geomorphic structures within the San Francisco Bay Area are dominated by tectonic deformation and along the San Andreas Fault system. This right-lateral strike-slip fault extends on land from the Gulf of California in Mexico, to Cape Mendocino, on the Coast of Humboldt County in northern California. It forms a portion of the boundary between two independent tectonic plates on the surface of the earth. To the west of the San Andreas Fault, the Pacific plate moves north relative to the North American plate, located east of the fault. 179 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 19 In the San Francisco Bay Area, movement across this plate boundary is distributed across the San Andreas Fault and a number of other faults including the Hayward, Calaveras, and San Gregorio. Together, these faults are referred to as the San Andreas Fault system. The general trend of the faults within this system is responsible for the strong northwest-southeast structural grain of geologic and geomorphic features in the San Francisco Bay Area. For most of the length of the San Andreas Fault, basement rock on the east generally consists of a chaotic mixture of highly deformed marine sedimentary, submarine volcanic and metamorphic rocks of the Franciscan Complex. The Franciscan rocks are generally considered Jurassic and Cretaceous age (about 65 to 205 million years old). Overlying the basement rocks are Cretaceous marine, as well as Tertiary (about 65 to 1.6 million years old) marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks with some continental volcanic rock. These Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks typically have been extensively folded and faulted largely as a result of movement along the San Andreas Fault System over about the last 25 million years. 3.4 SITE & LOCAL GEOLOGY Based on the Geologic Map of the San Francisco South 7.5 Quadrangle, the local geological conditions at the subject property and immediate surroundings consists of Franciscan rock alluvium lake, playa and terrace, consisting of sand, silty sand, sandy clay and clayey sand. Unconsolidated and semi-consolidated, 3.5 WETLANDS AND FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION AST reviewed information for the presence of wetlands and flood zone areas at and within ½-mile radius from the subject property. Information from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database provided by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reviewed online and provided by EDR. According to the one-mile radius map provided by EDR, there are no designated wetlands on-site. In addition to the above, based on the EDR report and the review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FM06081C0043F), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the subject property is located in an area of minimum flood hazard. 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AST representatives Mr. Alex Kassai and Mr. Al Mirza conducted the Phase I ESA site Reconnaissance of the subject property on February 21, 2025. The weather at the time of the site visit was clear and sunny. The site reconnaissance included inspection of the subject property and a perimeter survey of the surrounding/adjoining properties located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Miss Genesis Escudero of Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula accompanied Mr. Alex Kassai and Al Mirza during the site visit. Findings from the site reconnaissance, review/research and perimeter survey are presented in the following sections of this report. At the time of the site reconnaissance, the subject property was occupied by three one to two story buildings and associated hardscape and landscaped area. Access to the subject property was through 180 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 20 the driveway on the east of the site. Based on the reconnaissance of the subject property, accessible area(s) and subsurface features that were visible to the naked eye, we observed the following: 1.Observed asphalt paved driveway and parking lot with site lighting and landscaping areas. 2.No vents, hatches, or unusual pipes visible to the naked eye protruding from the ground were observed on the subject property with the exception of domestic water valves, fire hydrants, and electric / gas protruding from the ground). 3.No pad mounted or/ pole mounted transformers were observed on the subject property. 4.No septic systems, drywells, pits or/ sumps, groundwater wells were observed on the subject property at the time of this reconnaissance. 5.No signs of any major stains or any unusual or/ potentially hazardous chemicals, drums, or/ containers that spilled, leaked or/ were left in the open were observed on the subject property at the time of this site reconnaissance. 6.No signs of any unusual spills or/ soil discoloration or odors or/ vegetation distress were observed on the subject property at the time of this site reconnaissance. 7.No sign of storage of hazardous material was observed inside the buildings with the exception of some household cleaning supply. 4.1 ON-SITE STORAGE TANKS No visual indicators of current on-site aboveground or/ underground storage tanks were identified or/ observed during our reconnaissance of the subject property. Based on the review of the existing reports and information, it is our understanding that there are no reported active or/ abandoned underground or/ aboveground storage tanks at the subject property at the present time. 4.2 IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AST inspected the subject property for current chemical and hazardous waste storage and handling practices. At the time of this assessment, AST did not identify any hazardous materials or/ observe any visual evidence of use or/spills or/discoloration during the site reconnaissance of the subject property. 4.3 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM) Due to the age of the structures at the subject property, there is a chance of Asbestos Containing Building material. 4.4 LEAD BASED PAINTS (LBP) Due to the age of the structures at the subject property, there is a chance of lead-based paint being used during the construction of the existing buildings. 181 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 21 4.5 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) Typical sources of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) include electrical transformer cooling oils, fluorescent light fixture ballasts and hydraulic oil. In 1976, the USEPA banned the manufacture and sale of PCB-containing transformers. Prior to this date, transformers were frequently filled with a dielectric fluid containing PCB-laden oil. By 1985, the US EPA required that commercial property owners with transformers containing more than 500 parts per million (ppm) PCBs must register the transformer with the local fire department, provide exterior labeling, and remove combustible materials within 16 feet (40 Code of Federal Regulations 761.30: "Fire Rule"). No pole mounted or/ pad mounted transformer units were observed on the Subject Property. Transformers usually have Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) ownership insignia and maintenance of these transformers in the event of a leak is the sole responsibility of PG&E. According to PG&E most of the transformers (99.9%) have been replaced with mineral oil as per the abatement programs that were initiated in the 1980’s. However, there is always a possibility of having PCB in transformers. 4.6 RADIOACTIVE MAN-MADE MATERIALS No radioactive man-made materials were observed on the Subject Property at the time of our site reconnaissance. 4.7 PITS, PONDS AND LAGOONS No pits, ponds, or lagoons were visually observed during the site reconnaissance of the Subject Property at the present time. 4.8 SEPTIC TANKS AND CESSPOOLS Septic systems are not currently subject to environmental regulations in the State of California, and these systems should be removed as part of general development activities. Septic systems can be a source of nitrates to the subsurface; however, it is unlikely that these systems, contribute to a significant quantity of nitrates to the subsurface given that there are no longer in use. No septic tanks or/ cesspools were visually observed during the site reconnaissance of the Subject Property. 4.9 WELLS, CISTERNS AND SUMPS No monitoring wells or/ irrigation wells or/ cisterns or/ sumps were visible to the naked eye or/ visually observed during the site reconnaissance of the Subject property. Based on the review of the documents from the City of South San Francisco, Geotracker, and Envirostor websites, it is our understanding that there were no monitoring or/ irrigation wells on the Subject Property. 4.10 WASTEWATER INTERCEPTORS/GREASE INTERCEPTORS No wastewater interceptor / grease interceptor was observed by us during our site reconnaissance. 4.11 DRINKING WATER The Subject property is supplied with municipal drinking water by Cal Water since 1931. Based on the information provided by their web site, the supplied water meets or/ exceeds all drinking water 182 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 22 standards, including those for lead. Please note that testing of lead in drinking water was not within the scope of this assessment. 4.12 RADON Radon is a colorless, odorless, naturally occurring, radioactive, inert, gaseous element formed by radioactive decay of radium (Ra) atoms. The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones; Zone 1 being those areas with the average predicted indoor radon concentration in residential dwellings exceeding the US EPA Action Limit of 4.0 pico Curies per Liter (pCi/L). It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the US EPA recommends site-specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Radon sampling was not conducted as part of this assessment. Review of the US EPA Map of Radon Zones places the subject property in Zone 3, where average predicted radon levels are less than 2.0 pCi/L. Based upon the radon zone classification; radon is not considered to be a significant environmental concern. Site-specific radon values were not available and were not a part of this ASTM Phase I ESA. 4.13 PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES The subject property was not used for agricultural purposes in the past. Therefore the possibility of having residual pesticides and herbicides in the subsurface is non-existent. During our site reconnaissance of the subject property, AST did not observe any evidence or/ current usage of pesticides/herbicides as a concern at the time of our site reconnaissance. 5.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION The subject property is a double parcel of land located at 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California with an assessor parcel numbers of 093-331-110 and 093-331-150. AST obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below: TABLE II - HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION Year Historical Source Usage 1939-2024 EDR Aerial Photographs Identified 1922-2020 EDR City Directory Identified 1897-2021 EDR Topographic Maps Identified 1904-1978 EDR Certified Sanborn Maps Identified 183 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 23 1984-2024 EDR Building Permit Report Not Identified EDR Environmental Lien & AUL Search Not Identified EDR Property Tax Map report Not Identified Period/Date Source Description/Use Based on the review of the above EDR provided historical information reports, it is our understanding that the subject property was a rural parcels of land (1897-1960) and commercial development (Boys & Girls Club of Peninsula (1960 to present) 5.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW AST obtained and reviewed the existing available historic aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) dated February 03, 2025 to determine the historical usage of the property. These aerial photographs were reviewed for indications of historical documented features and for determining the previous usage of the subject property, as discussed below: Date: 2020 Source: USDA/NAIP Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly the same as it exist at the present. Date: 2016 Source: USDA/NAIP Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly the same as they did in the aerial photograph taken in 2020. Date: 2012 Source: USDA/NAIP Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly the same as they did in the aerial photograph taken in 2016. Date: 2009 Source: USDA/NAIP Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly the same as it did in the aerial photograph taken in 2012. Date: 2006 Source: USDA/NAIP Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly the same as it did in the aerial photograph taken in 2009. Date: 1998 Source: USDA Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this aerial photo revealed that the subject property and the general vicinity appears to be mostly the same as it did in the photograph taken in 2006. Date: 1993 Source: USGS/DQQQ Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property and the general vicinity/surroundings appear to be mostly similar to that of the photograph taken in 1998. 184 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 24 Date: 1982 Source: USGS Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity/surroundings appear to be mostly similar to that of the photograph taken in 1993. Date: 1970 Source: USGS Scale: 1” =500’ The subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly similar to the Photograph taken in 1982. Date: 1968 Source: USGS Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property and the general vicinity appear to be mostly similar to the Photograph taken in 1970. Date: 1963 Source: EDR Scale: 1” =5500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property has been developed and a small building is located on the southern portion of the site. Date: 1956 Source: USGS Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property and the site has not been developed and no building is occupying the subject property. Date: 1946 Source: USGS Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property and the general vicinity/surroundings appear to be substantially the same as they did in 1956 aerial photo. The property has not been developed. The church building on the west of the subject property does not exist. Date: 1943 Source: USDA Scale: 1” =500’ Review of this photograph revealed that the subject property is undeveloped and there is less development in the surrounding area. 5.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Sanborn Maps were originally created in the late 1800s and early 1900s for assessing fire insurance liability in urbanized areas of the United States. These maps usually include a detailed town and building information. Based on the coverage provided by EDR dated February 03, 2025; the subject property was identified as follow: Sanborn Maps dated 1970 – The subject property is occupied with Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula. The map also shows the Market Street right of way (Abandoned). Sanborn Maps dated 1956 – No building is occupying the subject property. Sanborn Map dated 1950 – Thee same as the Sanborn Map in 1970. No buildings / structures on the subject property. 185 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 25 5.3 CITY DIRECTORIES City directories have been produced for most urban and some rural areas since the late 1800s. The directories are generally not comprehensive and may contain gaps in time periods. AST reviewed and utilized historical city directories/information provided by EDR for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property and adjacent properties dating back to 1970 in the process of this site assessment. Based on the information received from EDR City Directory Abstract Dated February 12, 2025, the subject property with APNs #093-331-110 & 093-331-150 was identified in the research sources and correspond to following address: 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The following information was provided by (EDR) for the subject property and adjacent properties that are located to the north, south, east, and west of the subject property and they are as follows: TABLE III – CITY DIRECTORY (HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION) Year Target Property - Vicinity Source 2020 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club-N San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park EDR Digital Archive 2017 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club of America /Club of SSF Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2014 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco Boys & Girls Club of SSF Vicinity-Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2010 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2005 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo County Vicinity- Residential / Park Cole Information Services 2000 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Hoch, Shirlee J Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 1995 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club N. San Mateo Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 186 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 26 1992 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Boys & Girls Club Vicinity – Residential / Park Cole Information Services 1986 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1981 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1976 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1970 201 W. Orange Avenue-South San Francisco TP-Tri Cities Alternatives Vicinity – Residential / Park Haines Criss-Cross Directory For additional information, please refer to the enclosures in Appendix “C & D” of this report for documentation pertaining to the Environmental Lien Search Report provided by EDR, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, EDR-City Directory Abstract, Aerial Photographs and documents from various environmental agencies. 5.4 HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Historical Topographic Maps were originally created in the early 1900s for assessing and evaluating potential liability in urbanized areas of the United States for evaluating the potential liability on a property resulting from usage and past activities. These maps include a search and collection of public and private color historical topographic maps. AST attempted to review Historical Topographic Maps provided by EDR dated February 03, 2025; dating back to 1897 with the most recent topographic map being 2021. The following topographic maps were reviewed by us during this assessment: TABLE IV – TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS (HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION) Year Topographic Map Series Scale 2012-2021 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1995-1996 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1980 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1973 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1968 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1956 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 187 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 27 1950 San Francisco South 7.5-Minute 1” =24000’ 1947 San Francisco South 15-Minute 1” =24000’ 1939 San Mateo 15-Minute 1” =62500’ 1915 San Mateo 15-Minute 1” =62500’ 1899 San Mateo 15-Minute 1” =62500’ 1896 San Mateo 15-Minute 1” =62500’ Based on the review of the topographic maps provided by EDR, AST did not observe any major topographical changes at the subject property. 5.5 BUILDING PERMIT REPORT Building Permits report provided by EDR was reviewed as part of the historical sources of information to determine issuance of any permits to the subject property (APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) with Address: 201 W. Orange Avenue, South San Francisco for its usage in the past. Based on the information provided by EDR, dated February 3, 2025 it is our understanding that the building permit documents were reviewed from year 2024 and going back year 1901 revealed fire department inspections, handicap access, roof repair, wall removal, bathroom renovations and other repair works. However, there was no record of any significant violations that were associated or/ issued to the Subject Property. Please refer to the copy of these documents enclosed in Appendix “D” of this report. 5.6 HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS MAPS AST reviewed information available on-line through the California Department of Conservation’s website. The Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) Online Mapping System (DOMS) shows no oil wells in the immediate vicinity of the Subject Property. 5.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS No Chain of Title was provided by the client for this Phase I ESA. However, based on the preliminary title report and research and information provided by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) dated February 7, 2025, it is our understanding that there are no Environmental Liens or/ Reports or/ Activity and Use Limitation Reports that were associated with the Subject property. 5.8 VAPOR ENCROACHMENT CONCERNS Per the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E1527 (updated November 2021), Section X1.1.1.2, “Exclusions from Definitions of ‘Release’,” item 4, “the presence within a building of hazardous substances such as vapors that have migrated into a building from a “release into the environment” (i.e., from a release outside of the building) can result in CERCLA liability.” Further, per Section X5.8, “EPA does not regulate indoor air quality except to the extent that indoor air impacts are caused by releases of hazardous substances into subsurface soil or groundwater (vapor intrusion).” In accordance with the ASTM standard E2600, Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, 188 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 28 AST reviewed the “EDR Vapor Encroachment Screen” for the subject property. For this report, EDR completed a search of available environmental records for the site. The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E2600-10). Review of the reports provided by (EDR) revealed cases that are adjacent to the subject property which may have a significant adverse impact on the subject property. The adjacent properties sites that are located within a 1/8-mile radius of the subject property at equal or/ higher elevations and had prior incidents of soil and groundwater contamination have been closed with no further action deemed necessary. According to EDR, the status of the cases is "Under Remediation" or/ “Completed-Case Closed.” Due to the remediation/case closed status, the incidents are not likely to have adversely affected or/ impact the subject property. The ASTM definition of a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC) is “the presence or likely presence of chemical of concern vapors in the subsurface of the target property caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil and/or groundwater either on or near the target property.” A VEC is a broad concern involving contamination or potential contamination from subsurface vapor migration, while a Vapor Intrusion Condition (VIC) is focused on the migration or potential migration of contaminant vapors into building spaces. A VIC, if present, can potentially pose a health risk to the occupants of the building. A VIC is commonly associated with the presence of volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination, such as petroleum hydrocarbon or chlorinated solvent releases. A VIC can be caused by contamination from onsite or offsite sources, or a combination of both. AST has performed a Tier 1 Vapor Encroachment Screening (VES) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 2600-22 for the subject property. The purpose of this Tier 1 VES is to identify an existing or potential VEC affecting the subject property, as defined by ASTM Standard E 2600-22. Based on the findings of the Tier 1 VES conducted by AST, a VEC is not considered an issue of concern in connection with the subject property at this time. 5.9 CLIENT SUPPLIED REPORTS In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (The Brownfields Amendments), the User/Owner must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiry is not complete. The current property owner/user was asked to provide information or/ knowledge of the following: Any previous Phase I ESA or/ Phase II Investigation Reports that were conducted or/ prepared for the Subject Property Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the Subject Property or/ that have been filed or recorded in a registry Environmental cleanup liens that were associated or/ filed or/ recorded against the Subject Property Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLPs Commonly known or/ reasonably ascertainable information about the Subject Property 189 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 29 The reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA The degree of obviousness of the presence or/ likely presence of contamination at the Subject Property, and the ability to detect the contamination by an appropriate method of investigation Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is the key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. AST requested the Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-21, AST requested the following site information from User of this report, property owner(s) and their agents. AST was provided with the following report(s) by the current owner(s) and their representative(s) are as follows: TABLE V - OWNER PROVIDED INFORMATION Item Provided by User Owner Not Provided by User/Owner Discussed Below Does Not Apply Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X X Chain of Title Records X Grant Deed / Change of Ownership Record X Environmental Liens and or Activity Use Limitations X Specialized Knowledge X Valuation Reductions for Environmental Issues X Identification of Key Site Managers X Reason for Performing Phase I ESA Section 1.1 Prior Environmental Report(s) X Other X 190 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 30 5.10 INTERVIEWS Parcels with APN#s 093-331-110 and 093-331-150: No interviews were made with the exception of walkthrough with Ms. Genesis Escudero, Site Operations Manager, Orange Park Clubhouse. Mr. James Harris was interviewed via forwarding the owner questionnaire. Mr. Harris responded to the owner questionnaire on behalf of the ownership with No to questions. Based on that, we conclude the following: 1) No hazardous materials were stored on the Subject Property with the exception of Cleaning Supplies/products 2) No knowledge of having stained soil on the Subject Property in the past 3) No knowledge or/ Presence of Underground or/ Aboveground storage tanks on the Subject Property in the past Please refer to the enclosed copy of the response to the Owner(s) Questionnaire filled out by the Representative of the Current Owner(s) and Operator(s)/Tenant(s) and Sellers of the Subject Property, which is included below and in Appendix “C” of this report. TABLE VI - OWNER(s) QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE Question Response Any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property. Yes No X Any pending, threatened or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property Yes No X Any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. Yes No X Any incidents of flooding, leaks, or other water intrusion, and/or complaints related to indoor air quality. Yes No X 5.10.1 INTERVIEWS (PAST OWNERS, OPERATORS & OCCUPANTS) Interviews with past owners, operators and occupants of the Subject property were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. 191 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 31 6.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW AST reviewed the documents online and try to contacted local agencies, such as GEOTRACKER, ENVIROSTOR, Fire, Building/Planning and Public Works Departments in order to determine any current and/or historic hazardous materials usage, storage and/or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property. Additionally, AST researched and reviewed the information provided by EDR on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) at these agencies. As defined by ASTM E1527-21, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or/ limitations on the use of, or/ access to a site or/ facility: 1)To reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the subject property; or/ 2)To prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or/ populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil on the property or/ in the groundwater on the property. 6.1 ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AST reviewed the documents online and try to contact the South San Francisco Assessor’s office and viewed the available information on online pertaining to the subject property. Based on the review of the available information, it is our understanding that the ownership of the parcels belongs to City of South San Francisco. 6.2 BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AST reviewed the digital files/documents pertaining to the Subject Property at the City of South San Francisco/Planning/Engineering and Public Works Department for information for any violations pertaining to the Subject Property. Based on the information received (forwarded via email) and review of the digital/electronic files, it is our understanding that the Subject Property was utilized for mostly for commercial purposes by Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula and some of the permits that were issued were as follows: Conditional Use Permit and other improvement permits such as Plumbing, Electrical, Signage, Roof and for Outside/Patio Dinning etc. However, there were no permits or/ citations pertaining to violations on the Subject Property. Please refer to the copy available documents reviewed are enclosed in Appendix "D" of this report. 6.3 FIRE DEPARTMENT AST performed an online review of the records from the City of South San Francisco Fire Department for information pertaining to the possibility of any violations/ citation that have been issued to the subject property over the years. These records may contain evidence indicating current and/or historical hazardous materials usage, storage or releases, as well as the presence of USTs. Based on the information received from EDR building inspections, no violation has been issued by Fire Department to the subject property. Please refer to the copy information, enclosed in Appendix "D" of this report. 192 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 32 6.4 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL (DTSC) AST performed an online review of the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) ENVIROSTOR database for information pertaining to the subject property regarding any hazardous materials, spills, or/ releases at the subject property. Based on the review of records, there are no records in the database for the subject property. AST reviewed the ENVIROSTOR Database with the designated property addresses listed above. The review of this database did not reveal any documents and records or/ any environmental concerns at the Subject Property. No documents available on-line for the subject property. 6.5 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB-SF) AST reviewed the files online on the GEOTRACKER, a database maintained by Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB-SF Region) for information pertaining to any hazardous materials, spills, or/ releases at the Subject Property. However, AST’s review of the digital GEOTRACKER Database (geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/) maintained by RWQCB with the designated property addresses listed above revealed no such documentation or/ records pertaining to any environmental concerns or/ activities or/ violations at the Subject Property. 6.6 OIL & GAS EXPLORATION The State of California does not maintain records of oil and gas exploration. AST did not identify any oil or gas wells on or/ in the immediate vicinity or/ adjacent to the subject property during the course of this assessment. 6.7 MAPPED DATABASE RECORDS SEARCH/REVIEW As part of the Phase I ESA, AST utilized EDR of Shelton, Connecticut, as an information source for regulatory agency database records. The following summary of the database information is divided into two columns. The first column lists sites as identified and located by EDR within the specified distance of the Site. The second column lists orphan sites, which could not be located by EDR due to incomplete and/or inaccurate address information included in the USEPA/state databases, which AST identified as potentially lying within the search distance. Although locations of the orphan sites are frequently unknown, AST attempted to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impact that these facilities may have on the subject property. This evaluation consists of reviewing street names in an effort to learn whether the street on which the site is located lies within the search distance of the subject property, a drive-by view of surrounding properties during the reconnaissance/ visit to the Subject Property, and evaluating the site type and information provided by government agencies. The orphan sites (if any) included in the following table are those AST identified as potentially located within the identified search distance as reflected in the table below. TABLE VII - EDR DATABASE SITE LISTING Database Radius No. of Plottable Orphan National Priorities List 1 mile 0 0 RCRA Corrective Action Treatment/Storage/Disposal (TSD) Facilities (CORRACTS) 1 mile 1 0 193 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 33 Delisted National Priorities List 1 mile 0 0 State/Tribal Brownfield NPL Sites RESPONSE 1 mile 4 0 State/Tribal Brownfield Sites/CERCLIS Equivalent (ENVIROSTOR) 1 mile 15 0 CERCLA Sites ½-mile 0 0 CERCLA No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) Sites ½-mile 0 0 Federal Institutional Controls / Engineering Controls Registries ½-mile 0 0 RCRA Non-Corrective Action TSD Facilities ½-mile 0 0 State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites ½-mile 1 0 State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Sites ½-mile 32 0 State/Tribal Leaking Registered Storage Tank Sites ½-mile 1 0 Historic CORTESE List ½-mile 24 0 State/Tribal Solid Waste Landfill Sites/Facilities ½-mile 0 0 State/Tribal Brownfields Site ½-mile 0 0 SLIC ½-mile 9 0 HIST LUST ¼-mile 7 0 RCRA Large Quantity Generators ¼-mile 1 0 RCRA Small Quantity Generators ¼-mile 7 0 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators ¼-mile 0 0 State/Tribal Registered Storage Tank Sites ¼-mile 6 0 HIST UST ¼-mile 15 0 CA FID UST ¼-mile 4 0 SWEEPS UST ¼-mile 5 0 194 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 34 FINDS (Facility Index System) 0.001 1 0 HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. TP 0 0 HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. TP NPL LIENS TP NR 0 FEDERAL ERNS LIST TP NR 0 HAULERS 0.001 NR 0 US HIST CDL | US CDL 0.001 NR 0 LOCAL LAND RECORDS (DEED|LIENS |LIENS 2) 0.001 NR 0 HMIRS | CHMIRS | LDS | MCS | SPILLS 90 0 0 0 EPA WATCHLIST 0.001 NR 0 TSCA | TRIS | SSTS | 0.001 NR 0 US AIRS 0.001 NR 0 US FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 0.001 NR 0 RGA LF/RGA LUST 0.001 NR 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS 0.125-mile 2 0 CERS 0.001 1 0 HAZNET / HWTS TP 2 0 Other ascertainable records and databases of various other agencies were also searched for possible listing of the Subject Property within their databases. Review of the information provided by EDR; the Subject Property was identified only in CERS and in none of their remaining databases. A listing of facilities and adjoining properties that located in the vicinity of the subject property and have prior history of soil and groundwater contamination and are located at a higher elevation with respect to the groundwater flow direction have been included in the following sections of this report. A brief discussion of select facilities and their database listings are included in the table below. The full report provided by EDR and reviewed by AST can be found in Appendix "B" of this report. 195 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 35 6.7.1 TARGET/SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property was identified in the regulatory databases under HAZNET (The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC and HWTS (DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility). Forty five tons of asbestos containing building material was hauled off from the site and deposited in the landfill facility. However, no violations were reported or/associated with the subject property at the time of this Phase I Site Assessment. 6.7.2 GEOTRACKER & ENVIROSTOR DATABASE AST performed an online review of the ENVIROSTAR and the GEOTRACKER databases for information pertaining to the current status of the above-mentioned properties within a one-mile radius for possible impact from an off-site source. ENVIROSTOR - The Database is the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Internet-accessible database system used by the DTSC that allows people to quickly access vital information about environmental cleanups and permitted facilities in their communities. GEOTRACKER - The Database is the California State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) Internet-accessible database system used by the SWRCB, regional boards, and local agencies to track and archive compliance data from authorized or unauthorized discharges of waste to land, or/ unauthorized releases of hazardous substances from leaking underground storage tanks. According to information from GEOTRACKER nearby cases include the following: TABLE VI - EDR SITE LISITNG OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES Facility Name Facility Address Distance from the Site Database Reference Status Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula Subject Property 201 W. Orange Avenue TP EDR HIST HAZNET / HWTS Closed Bart (Ventilation Structure) 197 W. Orange Avenue <1/8-MILE; CERTS Storage Facility Compliance - Returned to compliance on 01/31/2020. Los Cerritos Elementary School 210 W. Orange Avenue <1/8-MILE; SSW RCRA EDR-Historical Auto No Violation Camoee Les Shell Station 289 C 3rd Street <1/8-MILE; SSW Historical Auto No Violations 196 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 36 Curtis Automotive Repair 301 B BARNEVELD AVE <1/8-MILE; SSW RCRA Listing No Violations SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 350 C Street <1/8-MILE; SSW RCRA Listing No Violations Proteolix 225 A GATEWAY BLVD <1/8-MILE; WSW RCRA No Violations Please note that the distance from the site and direction assigned by EDR. Actual distance from the site boundary may vary. AST's reviewed the databases with the designated property addresses listed above for information pertaining to their current status and the possibility of impact to the subject property from an offsite source. Based on the review of the available information, it is our understanding that none of the cases in the close proximity of the site will have any adverse impact to on the subject property. Henceforth, it is our opinion that due to the distance and the direction of the groundwater flow with respect to the Subject Property, the reported incidents above are not likely to have an adverse impact on or/ affect the Subject Property at the time. Copies of the referenced Case Summaries and Closures are presented in Appendix "B" of this report. 7.0 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS According to ASTM Standard of Practice E1527-21, recognized environmental conditions (REC) fall under three specific categories when evaluating a site or properties within the site vicinity. These categories are defined below. Recognized Environmental Condition (REC)- (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. AST did not identify any RECs during the course of this assessment. Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) A controlled recognized environmental condition, or CREC, is a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of controls. AST did not identify an existing CREC during the course of this assessment. Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) A historical recognized environmental condition, or HREC, is a a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and 197 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 37 meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities, without subjecting the property to any controls (for example activity and use limitations, or other property use limitations). AST did not identify an existing HREC during the course of this assessment. Other Environmental Considerations (OEC) warrant discussion, but do not qualify as RECs as defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21. These include, but are not limited to, de minimis conditions and/or environmental considerations such as the presence of ACMs, LBP, radon, mold, and lead in drinking water, which can affect the liabilities and financial obligations of the client, the health and safety of site occupants, and the value and marketability of the subject property. Regardless of construction date of the building, the EPA’s NESHAP requires that an asbestos survey adhering to AHERA sampling protocol be performed prior to demolition or renovation activities that may disturb ACMs. This requirement may be enforced by the local agency enforcing the federal EPA regulations. The NESHAP regulation specifies that all suspect ACMs be sampled to determine the presence or/ absence of asbestos prior to any renovation or demolition activities to prevent potential exposure to workers and/or building occupants. Based on the potential presence of ACMs, AST recommends the property owner develop and implement an Operation and Maintenance Plan for the subject property which stipulates the identification, assessment, repair and maintenance of building materials to protect the health and safety of the building occupants, visitors to the site, and the environment. Due to the age of the building at the subject property, there is a potential that LBP may be present on the subject property. AST recommends that the property owner consult with a certified Lead Risk Assessor to determine options for control of possible LBP hazards. Stringent local and State regulations may apply to LBP in association with building demolition/renovations and worker/occupant protection. It should be noted that construction activities that disturb materials or paints containing any amount of lead may be subject to certain requirements of the OSHA lead standard contained in 29 CFR 1910.1025 and 1926.62. 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 and the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) for the subject property located at 201 W. Orange Avenue, in South San Francisco, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 of this report. Based on the information collected from the review of the existing above-mentioned reports and documents, AST concludes that this Phase I Site Assessment has revealed no prior or/ present Recognized Environmental Concerns associated with the subject property in question. However, AST recommends the following: Due to the age of the building at the subject property, there is a potential that ACM and LBP may be present on the subject property. AST recommends that the property owner consult with a certified Risk Assessor to determine options for control of possible ACM and LBP hazards. Stringent local and State regulations may apply to ACM and LBP in association with building demolition/renovations and worker/occupant protection. Therefore, it recommended that ACM and LBP testing and assessment be undertaken, prior to commencement of any demolition or/ improvements or/ any construction activities that disturb materials or/ paints at the subject property. 198 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 38 9.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS AST conducted the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the Subject Property with Assessor Parcel Nos.: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 located at northwest corner of West Orange Avenue and Memorial Drive assigned street address of 201 W. Orange Avenue in South San Francisco, California in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report. AST declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the undersigned meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. AST has developed and performed “All Appropriate” inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Al Mirza Alex Kassai Al Mirza Alex A. Kassai, PE/REA Project Engineer Principal Am/AAK/CJ Cc: file 199 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA | Page 39 10.0 REFERENCES Contact List City of South San Francisco, Building, Planning, and Public Work Department City of South San Francisco Utilities City of South San Francisco Fire Department Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco (SFRWQCB) United States Environmental Protection Agency – Region 9, California United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet Reference Documents American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13 California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources, Online Mapping System (http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/index.html) California State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker (http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/) California Department of Toxic Substance Control, ENVIROSTOR http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Environmental Data Resources, 440 Wheelers Farms Road, Milford, CT 06461, provided the following reports: EDR One-Mile Radius Map EDR Historical Aerial Photographs EDR Historical Topographic Maps EDR Sanborn Maps EDR City Directory Image Report EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search EDR Building Permit Report Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Maps Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) December 2013 Tier I ESLs; Screening for Environmental Concerns at sites with contaminated Soil and Groundwater United States Geological Survey Topographic, 7.5-minute series, San Francisco South Quadrangles 200 SITE LOCATION MAP 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisco, California Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Boys and Girls Club of the PeninsulaPHASE I - SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Commercial Property 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California Plate No. 1AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 SUBJECT PROPERTY 201 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA An Existing Commercial Property (APNs:093-331-110 & 093-331-150) Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Plate No. 2AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisco, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Subject Property 202 Plate No. 3AST File No. 25273-ESA I Date: February 2025 343 So. Baywood Avenue - San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisc, California Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA An Existing Commercial Property APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula VICINITY SITE USAGE SUBJECT PROPERTY Orange Memorial Park Good News Chapel Los Cerrito Elementary School Residential Development Residential Development Residential Development 203 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA An Existing Commercial Property Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula PARCEL MAP Plate No. 4AST File No. 23190-ESA Date: February 2025 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisco, California Subject Property 204 Plate No. 8 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA An Existing Commercial Property APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 ONE-MILE RADIUS Map 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Subject Property 205 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I An Existing Commercial Property APNs: 093-331-110 & 093-331-150 Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula FEMA MAP Plate No. 9AST File No. 25273-ESA I Date: February 2025 343 So. Baywood Avenue - San Jose, California 210 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California 201 W. Orange Avenue l South San Francisco, California Subject Property 206 PHASE I | An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA APPENDIX “B” REPORTS PROVIDED BY EDR EDR - ONE MILE RADIUS MAP REPORT EDR - CITY DIRECTORY IMAGE REPORT EDR - HISTORIC SANBORN MAPS EDR – PROPERTY TAX MAP REPORT EDR - HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS EDR - HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS EDR - LIEN SEARCH & AULs REPORT 207 FORM-LBB-TFS ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula 201 West Orange Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Inquiry Number: 7887627.2s February 03, 2025 208 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 756 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-7 Physical Setting Source Map A-15 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-17 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. Copyright 2025 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC7887627.2s Page 1 209 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527 - 21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E2247 - 16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E1528 - 22) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 COORDINATES 37.6520520 - 37˚ 39’ 7.38’’Latitude (North): 122.4279260 - 122˚ 25’ 40.53’’Longitude (West): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 550464.4UTM X (Meters): 4167159.8UTM Y (Meters): 34 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 50005405 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH, CATarget Property Map: 2021Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20200524Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 210 7887627.2s Page 2 I39 ORANGE AVE SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL UST Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I38 SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, San Mateo Co. BI, HWTS, HAZNET Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I37 SHELL OIL CO 710 EL CAMINO RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, HIST CORTESE Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I36 ESD AUTO REPAIR INC 786 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 753, 0.143, West 35 ADA CHAN 115 MULBERRY AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Lower 748, 0.142, ESE F34 PO LING LI 744 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 741, 0.140, WSW J33 VERIZON WIRELESS EL 398 B. ST San Mateo Co. BI Higher 737, 0.140, South J32 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 398 B STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 737, 0.140, South J31 SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B San Mateo Co. BI Higher 737, 0.140, South J30 GARAGE 398 B STREET HIST UST Higher 737, 0.140, South J29 SSF UNIFIED SCH DIST 398 B ST CA FID UST Higher 737, 0.140, South J28 GARAGE 398 B ST HIST UST Higher 737, 0.140, South J27 SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST UST Higher 737, 0.140, South J26 SSF UNIFIED SCH DIST 398 B ST SWEEPS UST Higher 737, 0.140, South J25 SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CERS Higher 737, 0.140, South J24 SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST UST FINDER Higher 737, 0.140, South J23 S SAN FRAN UNIFIED S 398 B ST RCRA-LQG, FINDS, E MANIFEST Higher 737, 0.140, South I22 SHANTILAL V PATEL 770 EL CAMINO REAL HIST UST Higher 730, 0.138, WSW H21 HILLSIDE BOULEVARD E UNKNOWN HILLSIDE BLV CPS-SLIC, CERS Lower 703, 0.133, NE H20 BACON PROPERTY 499 RAIL AVE CPS-SLIC, CERS Lower 703, 0.133, NE H19 US STEEL FACILITY (F CROSS OYSTER POINT @ CPS-SLIC Lower 703, 0.133, NE H18 SHELL OIL SFO SATELL SFO, SOUTH FRONTAGE CPS-SLIC Lower 703, 0.133, NE G17 DAYTONA AUTO BODY SH 136 A S LINDEN AVE RCRA-SQG Higher 689, 0.130, WNW G16 AUTO PRECISION REPAI 140 A SOUTH LINDEN A RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 681, 0.129, WNW D15 317 SAN FRANCISCO 317 A ST. RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 672, 0.127, SSW D14 JOSEPH ANONUEVO 317 A STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 672, 0.127, SSW E13 A RAINBOW CLEANERS & 490 CO HAYES ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 587, 0.111, South F12 BARBARA BLINICK 239 A CRESCENT AVENU RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 574, 0.109, SW C11 KENNELLY CONSTRUCTIO 197-A SAN PEDRO RD HIST UST Higher 548, 0.104, West F10 PROTEOLIX 225 A GATEWAY BLVD RCRA-SQG Higher 502, 0.095, WSW E9 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 350 C STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 432, 0.082, South D8 CURTIS AUTOMOTIVE RE 301 B BARNEVELD AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 414, 0.078, SSW C7 TATCHA 161 B STARLITE ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 350, 0.066, WNW B6 CAMOEE LES SHELL SER 289 C 3RD ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 233, 0.044, South B5 SSFUSD - LOS CERRITO 210 W ORANGE AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 118, 0.022, SSE A4 BART ORANGE AVENUE V 197 W ORANGE AVE FINDS Lower 1 ft. A3 BART ORANGE AVENUE V 197 W ORANGE AVE CERS Lower 1 ft. A2 BOYS&GIRLS CLUB NORT 201 W ORANGE AVE HWTS, HAZNET TP A1 1X MARTIN, NORM 201 W ORANGE AVE HWTS, HAZNET TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 211 7887627.2s Page 3 K78 ALL TRANSMISSION 66 A ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 980, 0.186, WNW K77 LUCAS AND COMPANY 54 A BEAUMONT AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 973, 0.184, WNW K76 DALAND BODY SHOP 890 EL CAMINO REAL CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 943, 0.179, WNW K75 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 890 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, E MANIFEST, San Mateo Co.... Higher 943, 0.179, WNW K74 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 15-17 FIRST San Mateo Co. BI Higher 937, 0.177, WNW K73 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 15 FIRST ST # 17 RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 937, 0.177, WNW L72 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 931, 0.176, SW L71 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER Higher 931, 0.176, SW L70 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 931, 0.176, SW L69 CHEVRON 698 EL CAMINO REAL HIST CORTESE Higher 931, 0.176, SW L68 CHEVRON STATION NO 9 698 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 931, 0.176, SW L67 95669 698 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, HIST UST, Cortese, CERS Higher 931, 0.176, SW L66 CHEVRON STATION #566 698 EL CAMINO REAL CA FID UST Higher 931, 0.176, SW L65 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL CERS TANKS Higher 931, 0.176, SW L64 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 931, 0.176, SW L63 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, SWEEPS UST, San Mateo Co. BI, EMI Higher 931, 0.176, SW L62 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL UST Higher 931, 0.176, SW K61 MOTT & ALLEN 49-A MOSS ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 909, 0.172, WNW G60 JIM GRIFFIN & SON BR 872 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 885, 0.168, WNW G59 WEST COAST AUTO SERV 872 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 885, 0.168, WNW G58 PREMIER CAR SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA-SQG Higher 885, 0.168, WNW G57 TH AUTO SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 885, 0.168, WNW G56 PREMIER CAR SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 885, 0.168, WNW G55 ESD AUTO REPAIRS INC 872 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 885, 0.168, WNW K54 A 1 CONVERTER 101 1ST San Mateo Co. BI Higher 872, 0.165, WNW K53 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST LUST, HIST UST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 854, 0.162, WNW K52 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST LUST, SWEEPS UST, San Mateo Co. BI Higher 854, 0.162, WNW K51 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 854, 0.162, WNW K50 GREG LEONARDS GARAGE 107 1ST San Mateo Co. BI Higher 852, 0.161, WNW G49 GEORGE LEON 112 A STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 797, 0.151, WNW I48 AU ENERGY LLC, #8006 710 EL CAMINO REAL UST Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I47 BARBARIA’S SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I46 SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I45 AU ENERGY, LLC #8006 710 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I44 SOUTH CITY SHELL AUT 710 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I43 SOUTH CITY AUTO SERV 710 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I42 SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, HIST UST, Cortese, CERS Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I41 SOUTH CITY SHELL AUT 710 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI, HWTS, HAZNET Higher 797, 0.151, WSW I40 ORANGE AVE SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Higher 797, 0.151, WSW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 212 7887627.2s Page 4 S117 GUY F. ATKINSON CO. 10 WEST ORANGE AVENU UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 1465, 0.277, NE S116 GUY F. ATKINSON CO. 10 ORANGE LUST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, CERS Lower 1465, 0.277, NE S115 GUY F. ATKINSON COMP 10 W ORANGE AVE LUST, HIST UST Lower 1465, 0.277, NE S114 CITY GARAGE 736 TENNIS DR LUST, SWEEPS UST Lower 1379, 0.261, NE S113 CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 1379, 0.261, NE S112 CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 1379, 0.261, NE 111 RIGOBERTO GARCIA 620 MYRTLE AVENUE RCRA NonGen / NLR, E MANIFEST Lower 1317, 0.249, SE Q110 WESTBOROUGH DIALYSIS 925 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1292, 0.245, WNW Q109 BURGER KING 972 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI, CERS Higher 1283, 0.243, WNW Q108 CHEVRON, FORMER STAN 972 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, Cortese, CERS Higher 1283, 0.243, WNW Q107 CHEVRON, FORMER STAN 972 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 1283, 0.243, WNW R106 MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1208, 0.229, North R105 MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS DR SWEEPS UST Higher 1208, 0.229, North R104 MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS DR CA FID UST Higher 1208, 0.229, North Q103 HANKS RENTALS 932 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI, HWTS, HAZNET Higher 1194, 0.226, WNW P102 PARCELS NORTHWEST OF 781 TENNIS DRIVE LUST, CPS-SLIC, CERS Lower 1175, 0.223, NNE P101 SSF PARK CORP YARD 781 TENNIS San Mateo Co. BI Lower 1175, 0.223, NNE M100 SFPUC SOUTHWOOD DR W 608 SOUTHWOOD San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1171, 0.222, West M99 SFPUC SOUTHWOOD DRIV 608 SOUTHWOOD DRIVE RCRA-SQG, E MANIFEST Higher 1171, 0.222, West O98 S.S.F. HIGH SCHOOL 400 B LUST, San Mateo Co. BI, NPDES, CIWQS Higher 1161, 0.220, South O97 SAN FRANCISCO HIGH 400 B STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR, ICIS, FINDS, E MANIFEST Higher 1161, 0.220, South O96 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 1161, 0.220, South O95 S.S.F. HIGH SCHOOL 400 B UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 1161, 0.220, South O94 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST RCRA-SQG, LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 1161, 0.220, South L93 7-ELEVEN INC. STORE 635 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1160, 0.220, SSW N92 BADEN PUMP STATION 609 W ORANGE AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1105, 0.209, SW N91 SFPUC BADEN PUMP STA 609 W ORANGE AVE CERS TANKS, CERS Higher 1105, 0.209, SW N90 BADEN PUMP STATION 609 ORANGE San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1105, 0.209, SW N89 BADEN PUMP STATION 609 W ORANGE AVE AST Higher 1105, 0.209, SW L88 CAMINO DENTAL CARE 663 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI, HWTS, HAZNET Higher 1084, 0.205, SW 87 GLOBAL BLOOD THERAPE PFAS RCRA MANIFEST Lower 1074, 0.203, ENE L86 HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1050, 0.199, SW L85 HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL CERS HAZ WASTE, San Mateo Co. BI, DRYCLEANERS,... Higher 1050, 0.199, SW M84 GARDEN CHAPEL FUNERA 885 EL CAMINO REAL San Mateo Co. BI Higher 1031, 0.195, West L83 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL LUST Higher 1019, 0.193, SW L82 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 1019, 0.193, SW L81 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 1019, 0.193, SW L80 CHEVRON PRODUCTS COM 689 EL CAMINO REAL UST Higher 1015, 0.192, SW K79 ALL TRANSMISSIONS 66 A San Mateo Co. BI Higher 980, 0.186, WNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 213 7887627.2s Page 5 156 REICHOLD CHEMICALS, 120 SOUTH LINDEN RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, HIST Cal-Sites Lower 4575, 0.866, ESE 155 POETSCH AND PETERSON 325 SOUTH MAPLE AVEN ENVIROSTOR Lower 4495, 0.851, SE AB154 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN CA BOND EXP. PLAN Lower 4492, 0.851, East AB153 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, DEED Lower 4492, 0.851, East AB152 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN HIST Cal-Sites Lower 4492, 0.851, East 151 KEN MANUFACTURING CO 78 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN ENVIROSTOR Lower 4417, 0.837, ESE 150 MERRY X RAY CHEMICAL 131 S MAPLE AVE UNIT RCRA NonGen / NLR, HWP, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 3854, 0.730, ESE 149 MORENA TRUST 111 STARLITE STREET ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 3232, 0.612, East AA148 KPR PROPERTIES 118 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 2605, 0.493, East AA147 DON AND JERRYS AUTOM 118 SO SPRUCE AVE LUST, CERS HAZ WASTE, HIST UST, HWTS, HAZNET, CERS Lower 2605, 0.493, East AA146 KPR PROPERTIES 118 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE LUST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, CERS Lower 2605, 0.493, East Z145 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME 246 S SPRUCE AVE LUST, HIST UST, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 2561, 0.485, SE Z144 SPRUCE CAR WASH 246 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE LUST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, CERS Lower 2561, 0.485, SE Z143 SPRUCE CAR WASH 246 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 2561, 0.485, SE Z142 BIMBO BAKERIES USA I 264 S SPRUCE AVE LUST, NPDES, WDS, CIWQS, CERS Lower 2540, 0.481, SE Z141 OROWEAT FOODS COMPAN 264 S SPRUCE AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST CORTESE Lower 2540, 0.481, SE Z140 OROWEAT 264 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 2540, 0.481, SE Z139 OROWHEAT BAKERIES 264 S SPRUCE AVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, CA FID UST, San Mateo Co. BI,... Lower 2540, 0.481, SE W138 KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 2405, 0.455, ENE Y137 FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 2325, 0.440, NNW Y136 FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 2325, 0.440, NNW U135 MY CLEANERS 1053F EL CAMINO LUST, CPS-SLIC, FINDS, San Mateo Co. BI, EMI Higher 2318, 0.439, WNW X134 VILLAGE LINCOLN MERC 393 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 2312, 0.438, South X133 SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 2312, 0.438, South X132 SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL LUST, SWEEPS UST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, EMI,... Lower 2312, 0.438, South W131 KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD LUST, HIST UST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, HIST... Lower 2287, 0.433, ENE V130 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 W ORANGE AVE LUST, HWTS, HAZNET Higher 2248, 0.426, West V129 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 ORANGE LUST, San Mateo Co. BI Higher 2248, 0.426, West V128 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 WEST ORANGE AVEN UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 2248, 0.426, West V127 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 WEST ORANGE AVEN LUST, Cortese, CERS Higher 2248, 0.426, West U126 1010 EL CAMINO REAL 1010 EL CAMINO REAL CPS-SLIC Higher 2200, 0.417, NW T125 RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT UST FINDER RELEASE Higher 1837, 0.348, NW T124 RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT LUST, CA FID UST, San Mateo Co. BI, Cortese, HIST... Higher 1837, 0.348, NW T123 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FR 1 CHESTNUT AVE CPS-SLIC, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, RCRA NonGen / NLR,... Higher 1837, 0.348, NW T122 ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE UST FINDER RELEASE Lower 1821, 0.345, NW T121 ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 1821, 0.345, NW 120 GUY F ATKINSON COMPA 10 ORANGE HIST CORTESE Lower 1695, 0.321, NE 119 ROTOMETALS INC 980-82 HARRISON ENVIROSTOR Higher 1677, 0.318, WNW 118 735 COMMERCIAL AVE 735 COMMERCIAL AVE ENVIROSTOR, CPS-SLIC, VCP, CERS Higher 1638, 0.310, NNE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 214 7887627.2s Page 6 169 INTERNATIONAL PAINT 220 SOUTH LINDEN AVE ENVIROSTOR, San Mateo Co. BI, HIST CORTESE Lower 5105, 0.967, ENE AE168 WEST COAST AUTOMOTIV 160 S LINDEN AVE ENVIROSTOR Lower 5027, 0.952, SE AE167 DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOM 160 S LINDEN AVE SEMS-ARCHIVE, CORRACTS, RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 5027, 0.952, SE AE166 E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOU 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVE HIST Cal-Sites Lower 5027, 0.952, SE AE165 WEST COAST AUTOMOTIV 160 S LINDEN AVE LUST, HWP, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 5027, 0.952, SE AE164 DUPONT 160 LINDEN RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, LUST, San Mateo Co. BI,... Lower 5027, 0.952, SE 163 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVENUE Notify 65 Lower 4959, 0.939, ESE AC162 UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNI EAST OF 27 SOUTH LIN ENVIROSTOR, VCP, DEED Lower 4916, 0.931, East AD161 CAMP TANFORAN ENVIROSTOR Higher 4899, 0.928, SSE AD160 CAMP TANFORAN FUDS Higher 4888, 0.926, SSE 159 UNION PACIFIC - SITE EAST OF 69 S. LINDEN ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 4669, 0.884, ESE AC158 UNION PACIFIC RAILRO 27 S LINDEN AVE RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, Cortese, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 4654, 0.881, East AC157 BASAPCO, INC. 27-S. LINDEN ENVIROSTOR, VCP, DEED Lower 4654, 0.881, East MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 201 WEST ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 215 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site 1X MARTIN, NORM 201 W ORANGE AVE SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 N/AHWTS HAZNET GEPAID: CAC000537088 BOYS&GIRLS CLUB NORT 201 W ORANGE AVE S SAN FRAN, CA 94080 N/AHWTS HAZNET GEPAID: CAC002661982 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) 216 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites 217 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing PFAS NPL Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 PFAS FEDERAL SITES Federal Sites PFAS Information PFAS TSCA PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information PFAS TRIS List of PFAS Added to the TRI PFAS ATSDR PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing PFAS WQP Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS PFAS NPDES Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information PFAS PROJECT NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY PFAS PROJECT PFAS ECHO Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAIN Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS PT 139 AIRPORT All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing AQUEOUS FOAM NRC Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing BIOSOLIDS ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data PFAS PFAS Investigation Site Location Listing AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing CHROME PLATING Chrome Plating Facilities Listing CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE Inspection, Compliance and Enforcement HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List 219 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOM 160 S LINDEN AVE SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE167 744 EPA ID:: CAD009206855 Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ S SAN FRAN UNIFIED S 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J23 57 EPA ID:: CAD081556888 220 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there are 7 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PROTEOLIX 225 A GATEWAY BLVD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) F10 34 EPA ID:: CAR000151027 DAYTONA AUTO BODY SH 136 A S LINDEN AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.130 mi.) G17 50 EPA ID:: CAD982414237 SHELL OIL CO 710 EL CAMINO WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I37 123 EPA ID:: CAD981401680 PREMIER CAR SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G58 186 EPA ID:: CAR000368415 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 890 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) K75 270 EPA ID:: CAD981378797 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O94 379 EPA ID:: CAD981629694 SFPUC SOUTHWOOD DRIV 608 SOUTHWOOD DRIVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) M99 414 EPA ID:: CAR000337667 Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 RESPONSE sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN E 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) AB153 648 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 10/21/2024 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only Facility Id: 41280103 REICHOLD CHEMICALS, 120 SOUTH LINDEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.866 mi.) 156 659 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 10/21/2024 Status: Certified Facility Id: 41280096 UNION PACIFIC RAILRO 27 S LINDEN AVE E 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) AC158 681 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 10/21/2024 Status: Active Facility Id: 60003650 DUPONT 160 LINDEN SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE164 722 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 10/21/2024 Status: Certified 221 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 Facility Id: 41280049 Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/21/2024 has revealed that there are 15 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 735 COMMERCIAL AVE 735 COMMERCIAL AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.310 mi.) 118 458 Facility Id: 70000073 Status: Certified ROTOMETALS INC 980-82 HARRISON WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.318 mi.) 119 467 Facility Id: 38330089 Status: No Further Action CAMP TANFORAN SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.928 mi.) AD161 706 Facility Id: 80000381 Status: No Further Action PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MORENA TRUST 111 STARLITE STREET E 1/2 - 1 (0.612 mi.) 149 591 Facility Id: 60002386 Status: Active KEN MANUFACTURING CO 78 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.837 mi.) 151 643 Facility Id: 41280135 Status: Refer: Other Agency SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN E 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) AB153 648 Facility Id: 41280103 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only POETSCH AND PETERSON 325 SOUTH MAPLE AVEN SE 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) 155 658 Facility Id: 41310004 Status: Refer: RWQCB REICHOLD CHEMICALS, 120 SOUTH LINDEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.866 mi.) 156 659 Facility Id: 41280096 Status: Certified BASAPCO, INC. 27-S. LINDEN E 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) AC157 664 Facility Id: 41360069 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance UNION PACIFIC RAILRO 27 S LINDEN AVE E 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) AC158 681 222 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 Facility Id: 60003650 Status: Active UNION PACIFIC - SITE EAST OF 69 S. LINDEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.884 mi.) 159 690 Facility Id: 60001636 Status: Active UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNI EAST OF 27 SOUTH LIN E 1/2 - 1 (0.931 mi.) AC162 707 Facility Id: 60001136 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only DUPONT 160 LINDEN SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE164 722 Facility Id: 41280049 Status: Certified WEST COAST AUTOMOTIV 160 S LINDEN AVE SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE168 751 Facility Id: 80001622 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation INTERNATIONAL PAINT 220 SOUTH LINDEN AVE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.967 mi.) 169 752 Facility Id: 38280291 Status: Refer: RCRA Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 32 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I38 126 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I42 150 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550018 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100490 Global ID: T0608100490 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K52 174 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 8/10/2000 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K53 175 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550118 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed 223 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Global Id: T0608100696 Global ID: T0608100696 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L63 196 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization 95669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L67 226 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550010 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100145 Global ID: T0608100145 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) L82 318 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550088 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100144 Global ID: T0608100144 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) L83 322 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 12/19/2001 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O94 379 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550085 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100508 Global ID: T0608100508 S.S.F. HIGH SCHOOL 400 B S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O98 411 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 8/4/1993 CHEVRON, FORMER STAN 972 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) Q108 426 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550196 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: SL0608123509 Global ID: SL0608123509 RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) T124 480 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Facility Id: 550087 224 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100429 Global ID: T0608100429 date9: 1/8/1996 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 WEST ORANGE AVEN W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.) V127 486 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608191183 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 ORANGE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.) V129 490 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 8/9/2001 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 W ORANGE AVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.) V130 491 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 550164 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: T0608191183 MY CLEANERS 1053F EL CAMINO WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.439 mi.) U135 505 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 559210 Facility Status: 3B- Preliminary Assessment Underway Global ID: TI0000003589 FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.440 mi.) Y137 513 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Facility Id: 550046 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100215 Global ID: T0608100215 date9: 7/9/1992 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PARCELS NORTHWEST OF 781 TENNIS DRIVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) P102 420 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 559204 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: TI0000002366 CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) S113 445 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550110 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100598 Global ID: T0608100598 CITY GARAGE 736 TENNIS DR NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) S114 451 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed 225 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 date9: 8/21/2003 GUY F. ATKINSON COMP 10 W ORANGE AVE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) S115 452 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 550120 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: T0608100701 GUY F. ATKINSON CO. 10 ORANGE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) S116 453 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0608100701 date9: 5/27/1997 ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) T121 468 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550089 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608151808 Global ID: T0608151808 KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.433 mi.) W131 493 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Facility Id: 550127 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100748 Global ID: T0608100748 date9: 6/12/2003 SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X132 498 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 10/27/1992 VILLAGE LINCOLN MERC 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X134 502 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 550080 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global Id: T0608100504 Global ID: T0608100504 OROWHEAT BAKERIES 264 S SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) Z139 518 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Post remedial action monitoring Global Id: T0608100911 BIMBO BAKERIES USA I 264 S SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) Z142 538 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 226 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 Facility Id: 550150 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: T0608100911 SPRUCE CAR WASH 246 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.) Z144 547 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608100512 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME 246 S SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.) Z145 564 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 550034 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: T0608100512 KPR PROPERTIES 118 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) AA146 571 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608100296 DON AND JERRYS AUTOM 118 SO SPRUCE AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) AA147 575 Database: SAN MATEO CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Facility Id: 550007 Facility Status: 9- Case Closed Global ID: T0608100296 CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 9 CPS-SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 735 COMMERCIAL AVE 735 COMMERCIAL AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.310 mi.) 118 458 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Global Id: SL0608169862 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment Facility Id: 41S0057 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FR 1 CHESTNUT AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) T123 473 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Global Id: T10000013692 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed 1010 EL CAMINO REAL 1010 EL CAMINO REAL NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.417 mi.) U126 485 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Global Id: T10000014438 Facility Status: Open - Long Term Management MY CLEANERS 1053F EL CAMINO WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.439 mi.) U135 505 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Global Id: T10000003589 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHELL OIL SFO SATELL SFO, SOUTH FRONTAGE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) H18 52 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 227 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ US STEEL FACILITY (F CROSS OYSTER POINT @ NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) H19 53 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Id: SL20261879 BACON PROPERTY 499 RAIL AVE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) H20 53 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Global Id: SLT2O327217 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 41S0064 HILLSIDE BOULEVARD E UNKNOWN HILLSIDE BLV NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) H21 55 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Global Id: SLT2O321212 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 41S0057 PARCELS NORTHWEST OF 781 TENNIS DRIVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) P102 420 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Global Id: T10000002366 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J27 100 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 ORANGE AVE SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I39 129 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Facility Id: 41--022609 AU ENERGY LLC, #8006 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I48 166 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Facility Id: FA0050279 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L62 192 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Facility Id: 220125_017714 CHEVRON PRODUCTS COM 689 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) L80 316 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 Facility Id: 41--017714 228 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BADEN PUMP STATION 609 W ORANGE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) N89 364 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/21/2024 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 735 COMMERCIAL AVE 735 COMMERCIAL AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.310 mi.) 118 458 Status: Certified Facility Id: 70000073 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there are 3 HIST Cal-Sites sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN E 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) AB152 644 REICHOLD CHEMICALS, 120 SOUTH LINDEN ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.866 mi.) 156 659 E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOU 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVE SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE166 742 CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/2024 has revealed that there are 5 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J25 71 229 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L72 243 DALAND BODY SHOP 890 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) K76 292 HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.199 mi.) L85 322 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O96 386 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 5 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSF UNIFIED SCH DIST 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J26 99 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 550197 BARBARIA’S SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I47 164 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 550060 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K52 174 Comp Number: 550119 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L63 196 Comp Number: 550051 MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS DR N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) R105 424 Comp Number: 550132 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 7 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ KENNELLY CONSTRUCTIO 197-A SAN PEDRO RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C11 37 Facility Id: 00000042042 SHANTILAL V PATEL 770 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.138 mi.) I22 56 Facility Id: 00000059893 GARAGE 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J28 104 Facility Id: 00000031110 GARAGE 398 B STREET S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J30 106 SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I42 150 Facility Id: 00000028583 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K53 175 230 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 22 Facility Id: 00000010425 95669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L67 226 Facility Id: 00000062797 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 4 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSF UNIFIED SCH DIST 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J29 105 Facility Id: 41000988 Status: A BARBARIA’S SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I47 164 Facility Id: 41000472 Status: A CHEVRON STATION #566 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L66 225 Facility Id: 41000158 Status: A MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS DR N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) R104 424 Facility Id: 41004924 Status: A CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/2024 has revealed that there are 3 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J25 71 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L65 202 SFPUC BADEN PUMP STA 609 W ORANGE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) N91 365 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there are 27 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD - LOS CERRITO 210 W ORANGE AVE SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.022 mi.) B5 20 231 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 EPA ID:: CAL000375439 TATCHA 161 B STARLITE ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.066 mi.) C7 26 EPA ID:: CAC002976423 CURTIS AUTOMOTIVE RE 301 B BARNEVELD AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.) D8 28 EPA ID:: CAL000477158 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 350 C STREET S 0 - 1/8 (0.082 mi.) E9 30 EPA ID:: CAC003146574 BARBARA BLINICK 239 A CRESCENT AVENU SW 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) F12 37 EPA ID:: CAC003141991 JOSEPH ANONUEVO 317 A STREET SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.127 mi.) D14 42 EPA ID:: CAC003203347 317 SAN FRANCISCO 317 A ST. SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.127 mi.) D15 46 EPA ID:: CAR000347773 AUTO PRECISION REPAI 140 A SOUTH LINDEN A WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.129 mi.) G16 47 EPA ID:: CAC003147366 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 398 B STREET S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J32 107 EPA ID:: CAC003240331 PO LING LI 744 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) F34 111 EPA ID:: CAC003180545 ESD AUTO REPAIR INC 786 EL CAMINO REAL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.143 mi.) I36 119 EPA ID:: CAL000435826 ORANGE AVE SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I40 130 EPA ID:: CAL000358143 SOUTH CITY SHELL AUT 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I44 157 EPA ID:: CAL000176456 GEORGE LEON 112 A STREET WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) G49 169 EPA ID:: CAC003067806 PREMIER CAR SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G56 180 EPA ID:: CAC003259952 EPA ID:: CAC003203278 TH AUTO SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G57 184 EPA ID:: CAL000348815 MOTT & ALLEN 49-A MOSS ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.) K61 190 EPA ID:: CAD981452071 CHEVRON STATION NO 9 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L68 234 EPA ID:: CAR000121251 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L70 237 EPA ID:: CAL000196225 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 15 FIRST ST # 17 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) K73 267 EPA ID:: CAL000388358 LUCAS AND COMPANY 54 A BEAUMONT AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.184 mi.) K77 311 EPA ID:: CAC003180892 ALL TRANSMISSION 66 A ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.186 mi.) K78 313 EPA ID:: CAL000343374 HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.199 mi.) L86 346 EPA ID:: CAL000377366 BADEN PUMP STATION 609 W ORANGE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) N92 377 232 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24 EPA ID:: CAL000308577 SAN FRANCISCO HIGH 400 B STREET S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O97 396 EPA ID:: CAD981989981 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ADA CHAN 115 MULBERRY AVE ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.142 mi.) 35 115 EPA ID:: CAC003104591 RIGOBERTO GARCIA 620 MYRTLE AVENUE SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) 111 440 EPA ID:: CAC003127891 FUDS: The Listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites Properties where the US Army Corps Of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. A review of the FUDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/01/2024 has revealed that there is 1 FUDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CAMP TANFORAN SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.926 mi.) AD160 704 FINDS: The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers" to other sources of information that contain more detail. These include: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS); Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS; and TSCA. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS. A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/13/2024 has revealed that there is 1 FINDS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BART ORANGE AVENUE V 197 W ORANGE AVE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A4 20 Registry ID:: 110064891951 PFAS RCRA MANIFEST: To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, PERFL, AFFF, GENX, GEN-X (plus the VT waste codes). These keywords were searched for in the following text fields: Manifest handling instructions (MANIFEST_HANDLING_INSTR), Non-hazardous waste description (NON_HAZ_WASTE_DESCRIPTION), DOT printed information (DOT_PRINTED_INFORMATION), Waste line handling instructions (WASTE_LINE_HANDLING_INSTR), Waste residue comments (WASTE_RESIDUE_COMMENTS). A review of the PFAS RCRA MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/30/2024 has revealed that there is 1 PFAS RCRA MANIFEST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GLOBAL BLOOD THERAPE ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) 87 348 233 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 25 UST FINDER RELEASE: US EPA’s UST Finder data is a national composite of leaking underground storage tanks. This data contains information about, and locations of, leaking underground storage tanks. Data was collected from state sources and standardized into a national profile by EPA’s Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Office of Research and Development, and the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials. A review of the UST FINDER RELEASE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/08/2023 has revealed that there are 17 UST FINDER RELEASE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I46 163 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K51 173 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L64 201 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) L81 317 S.S.F. HIGH SCHOOL 400 B S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O95 385 CHEVRON, FORMER STAN 972 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) Q107 425 RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) T125 485 WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 WEST ORANGE AVEN W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.) V128 489 FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.440 mi.) Y136 512 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) S112 444 GUY F. ATKINSON CO. 10 WEST ORANGE AVENU NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) S117 457 ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) T122 472 SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X133 501 KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.455 mi.) W138 517 OROWEAT 264 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) Z140 536 SPRUCE CAR WASH 246 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.) Z143 547 KPR PROPERTIES 118 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) AA148 590 UST FINDER: EPA developed UST Finder, a web map application containing a comprehensive, state-sourced national map of underground storage tank (UST) and leaking UST (LUST) data. It provides the attributes and locations of active and closed USTs, UST facilities, and LUST sites from states and from Tribal lands and US territories . UST Finder contains information about proximity of UST facilities and LUST sites to: surface and groundwater public drinking water protection areas; estimated number of private domestic wells and number of people living nearby; and flooding and wildfires. A review of the UST FINDER list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/08/2023 has revealed that there are 3 UST FINDER sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J24 70 SOUTH CITY AUTO SERV 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I43 156 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L71 242 E MANIFEST: EPA established a national system for tracking hazardous waste shipments electronically. This system, known as ?e-Manifest,? will modernize the nation?s cradle-to-grave hazardous waste tracking process while saving valuable time, resources, and dollars for industry and states. A review of the E MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there are 18 E MANIFEST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. 234 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 26 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD - LOS CERRITO 210 W ORANGE AVE SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.022 mi.) B5 20 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 350 C STREET S 0 - 1/8 (0.082 mi.) E9 30 BARBARA BLINICK 239 A CRESCENT AVENU SW 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) F12 37 JOSEPH ANONUEVO 317 A STREET SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.127 mi.) D14 42 S SAN FRAN UNIFIED S 398 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J23 57 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 398 B STREET S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J32 107 PO LING LI 744 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) F34 111 ESD AUTO REPAIR INC 786 EL CAMINO REAL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.143 mi.) I36 119 ORANGE AVE SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I40 130 SOUTH CITY SHELL AUT 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I44 157 GEORGE LEON 112 A STREET WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) G49 169 PREMIER CAR SERVICES 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G56 180 CAMINO PETROLEUM 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L70 237 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 890 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) K75 270 SAN FRANCISCO HIGH 400 B STREET S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O97 396 SFPUC SOUTHWOOD DRIV 608 SOUTHWOOD DRIVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) M99 414 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ADA CHAN 115 MULBERRY AVE ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.142 mi.) 35 115 RIGOBERTO GARCIA 620 MYRTLE AVENUE SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) 111 440 CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. A review of the CA BOND EXP. PLAN list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/1989 has revealed that there is 1 CA BOND EXP. PLAN site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SUN CHEMICAL CORPORA 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVEN E 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) AB154 657 Hazardous Materials Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Generator, Underground Storage tanks A review of the San Mateo Co. BI list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/20/2020 has revealed that there are 27 San Mateo Co. BI sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSFUSD DISTRICT OFFI 398 B S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J31 106 Facility Id: FA0013350 VERIZON WIRELESS EL 398 B. ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) J33 111 Facility Id: FA0027619 SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I38 126 Facility Id: FA0024009 Facility Id: FA0017721 SOUTH CITY SHELL AUT 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I41 137 Facility Id: FA0050279 AU ENERGY, LLC #8006 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I45 163 Facility Id: FA0010865 GREG LEONARDS GARAGE 107 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.) K50 173 235 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 27 Facility Id: FA0027996 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K52 174 Facility Id: FA0017773 A 1 CONVERTER 101 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) K54 179 Facility Id: FA0016561 ESD AUTO REPAIRS INC 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G55 179 Facility Id: FA0062970 WEST COAST AUTO SERV 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G59 189 Facility Id: FA0064050 JIM GRIFFIN & SON BR 872 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.168 mi.) G60 189 Facility Id: FA0017840 Facility Id: FA0045324 CHEVRON 9-5669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L63 196 Facility Id: FA0017714 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 15-17 FIRST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) K74 269 Facility Id: FA0053957 DALAND BODY SHOP INC 890 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) K75 270 Facility Id: FA0017814 ALL TRANSMISSIONS 66 A WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.186 mi.) K79 315 Facility Id: FA0002692 Facility Id: FA0040490 GARDEN CHAPEL FUNERA 885 EL CAMINO REAL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) M84 322 Facility Id: FA0044990 HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.199 mi.) L85 322 Facility Id: FA0024558 Facility Id: FA0046457 CAMINO DENTAL CARE 663 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.205 mi.) L88 349 Facility Id: FA0046049 BADEN PUMP STATION 609 ORANGE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) N90 364 Facility Id: FA0025366 7-ELEVEN INC. STORE 635 EL CAMINO REAL SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) L93 379 Facility Id: FA0055314 S.S.F. HIGH SCHOOL 400 B S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O98 411 Facility Id: FA0022944 SFPUC SOUTHWOOD DR W 608 SOUTHWOOD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) M100 419 Facility Id: FA0064505 HANKS RENTALS 932 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) Q103 422 Facility Id: FA0037239 MAZZANTI CARNATIONS 820 TENNIS N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) R106 425 Facility Id: FA0017785 Facility Id: FA0027162 BURGER KING 972 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) Q109 434 Facility Id: FA0065658 WESTBOROUGH DIALYSIS 925 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) Q110 440 Facility Id: FA0045183 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SSF PARK CORP YARD 781 TENNIS NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) P101 420 236 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 28 Facility Id: FA0011702 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/16/2024 has revealed that there are 17 Cortese sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHELL 710 EL CAMINO REAL WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I42 150 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K53 175 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 95669 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L67 226 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) L82 318 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O94 379 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CHEVRON, FORMER STAN 972 EL CAMINO REAL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) Q108 426 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) T124 480 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED WEST ORANGE LIBRARY 840 WEST ORANGE AVEN W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.) V127 486 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.440 mi.) Y137 513 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) S113 445 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED GUY F. ATKINSON CO. 10 ORANGE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) S116 453 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) T121 468 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.433 mi.) W131 493 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X132 498 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED OROWHEAT BAKERIES 264 S SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) Z139 518 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED SPRUCE CAR WASH 246 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.) Z144 547 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED KPR PROPERTIES 118 SOUTH SPRUCE AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) AA146 571 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 237 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 29 DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners’ agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HOLIDAY CLEANERS 675 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.199 mi.) L85 322 Database: DRYCLEAN BAY AREA, Date of Government Version: 02/20/2019 Database: DRYCLEANERS, Date of Government Version: 08/28/2024 EPA Id: CAL000377366 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 14 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHELL OIL CO 710 EL CAMINO WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) I37 123 Reg Id: 41-0514 STAN THE ROOF MAN 103 1ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) K53 175 Reg Id: 41-0736 CHEVRON 698 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) L69 237 Reg Id: 41-0153 CHEVRON 9-0248 687 EL CAMINO REAL SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) L82 318 Reg Id: 41-0152 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 B ST S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) O94 379 Reg Id: 41-0532 RON PRICE MOTORS 1 CHESTNUT NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) T124 480 Reg Id: 41-0453 FINLEY CONSTRUCTION 125 CHESTNUT NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.440 mi.) Y137 513 Reg Id: 41-0226 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SSF CORP YAR 736 TENNIS DR NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) S113 445 Reg Id: 41-0626 GUY F ATKINSON COMPA 10 ORANGE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.) 120 468 Reg Id: 41-0741 ACUTEC AUTOS 45 CHESTNUT AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) T121 468 Reg Id: 41-0007 KLIX CORP. 551 RAILROAD ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.433 mi.) W131 493 Reg Id: 41-0792 SOUTH CITY DODGE 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X132 498 Reg Id: 41-0528 VILLAGE LINCOLN MERC 393 EL CAMINO REAL S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.438 mi.) X134 502 238 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 30 Reg Id: 41-0722 OROWEAT FOODS COMPAN 264 S SPRUCE AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) Z141 537 Reg Id: 41-0997 Reg Id: 2483 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/12/2024 has revealed that there are 2 HWP sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MERRY X RAY CHEMICAL 131 S MAPLE AVE UNIT ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.730 mi.) 150 608 EPA ID: CAL000051065 Cleanup Status: CLOSED WEST COAST AUTOMOTIV 160 S LINDEN AVE SE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) AE165 739 EPA ID: CAD009206855 Cleanup Status: CLOSED Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/05/2024 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVENUE ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.939 mi.) 163 722 CERS: The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials A review of the CERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/2024 has revealed that there is 1 CERS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BART ORANGE AVENUE V 197 W ORANGE AVE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A3 11 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 239 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 31 EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Auto site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CAMOEE LES SHELL SER 289 C 3RD ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B6 25 EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ A RAINBOW CLEANERS & 490 CO HAYES ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.111 mi.) E13 41 240 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC7887627.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 32 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 4 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ FAA LUST, HIST CORTESE ROD MC LELLAN CO. SWF/LF O‘BRIAN CORP SITE SWF/LF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECYCLING CENT ENVIROSTOR 241 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 0 320 560520480440 440 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 60 360 20 0 320 3 2 0 280 2 8 0 2 8 024 0 240 2 40 2 0 0 200 20 0 2 4 0 24 0 200200 200 200 5 60 200 5 2 0 5 2 0 480 3 60 28 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 6 0 1 60 1 6 0 1 6 0 16 0 160 160 12 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 20 2 0 1 20 1 20 120 1 2 0 8 0 80 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 80 8 0 80 80 80 4 0 4 0 40 40 40 40 242 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 80 40 40 243 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 1 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-PHA l Date: February 2025 North of the Property, Showing the Property and Storm Drain west side of the Property3View West - Showing Subject Property, Memorial Drive to the East of the Subject Property 1 View North - Subject Property 2 View West - Subject Property, Building and Parking Lot 4 244 View West- Showing the Good News Chapel, and W. Orange Avenue7Photograph taken from South Showing the Subject Property 5 West Side of the Property - Showing the Property and Part of Good News Chapel on the West 6 BART Orange Avenue Pump Station- Located to the South East of the Subject Property. 8 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 2 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 245 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 3 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: Februry 2025 Parking Lots (Subject Property) and Orange Memorial Park on the East of the Subject Property 11 Orange Memorial Park to the East of the Subject Property 9 View South - Showing W. Orange Avenue and Los Cerritos Elementary School on the South 10 Subject Property Utility Enclosure Located on the West Side of the Property 12 246 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 4 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 Photograph of Gymnasium at the Subject Property15 High Voltage Plant Located off- site to the northeast of the subject property 13 PGE Underground Access Manhole Located in the Parking Lot, East of the Buildings 14 Cacth Basin on the Subject Property 16 247 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 5 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-PHA l Date: February 2025 Corridor to Class Rooms and Gym19Bathroom -Floor Covering (Tiles) 17 One and Five Gallon Can of Paints In Storage Area 18 Materials Stored in the Garage 20 248 Storage Area23Typical Classrooms 21 Entrance Area 22 Electrical Line (230 KV) Running Along East of the Existing Building 24 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 6 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: February 2025 249 Photographs of the Subject Property & Vicinity 343 So. Baywood Avenue | San Jose, California 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California Photo Plate No. 7 Advance Soil Technology, Inc. Geological , Geotechnical, Environmental Consulting & Construction Services PHASE I ESA Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (APN #s 093-331-110 & 093-331-150) AST File No. 25273-ESA Date: Februry 2025 Memorial Park SportsField 27 Configuration of the Existing Building 25 Typical Household Cleaning Chemicals 26 Sanitary Sewer Manhole 28 250 PHASE I ESA| An Existing Boys & Girls Club of the Peninsula 201 W. Orange Avenue | South San Francisco, California AST Project No. 25273-ESA APPENDIX “F” RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 251 Inc. Geotechnical | Environmental | Consulting Engineers | Construction Services Position in the Firm: Principal Total Years of Experience: 43 years Education: B.S. Civil Engineering | Oregon State University M.S. Civil Engineering | San Jose State University APNGA - Certificate of Achievement (Radiation Safety Officer) Professional Affiliations: American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineers of Northern California Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, State of California Registered Environmental Assessor, State of California California Contractors License A&B | General Engineering & Building California Contractors License Hazardous Substances Removal & Remediation Areas of Expertise | Professional Qualifications: Geological | Geotechnical Investigations Deep Foundations Analysis in weak soils Earthquake | Seismic Risk Evaluation Site Specific Response Spectra Forensic Investigation Liquefaction Study Slope Stability Mr. Kassai is a founder of AST (Advance Soil Technology) Inc. For the past 42 years he has provided services in the field of Geotechnical | Environmental for commercial, Industrial, Schools, and Residential Developments in the Bay Area. Mr. Kassai has received extensive formal trainings and education and with his seasoned background and professional certifications and years of industry experience providing diversified geotechnical and environmental service/solutions for a wide variety of projects since 1974. His ability to effectively communicate with clients, regulatory agencies, and contractors during all phases of projects has resulted in many long-standing client relationships within the private and public sectors. Experience: 1988 - Present Geotechnical Engineer | Advance Soil Technology, Inc. 2005 - 2006 Visiting Professor Soil Mechanics | San Jose State University, California 1979 - 1988 Vice President | United Soil Engineering Inc. 1974 - 1975 Concrete Laboratory | Portland State University Alex A. Kassai Vice President | Principal Manager Testing Services Technical Director | Director of Operations 252 Inc. Geotechnical | Environmental | Consulting Engineers | Construction Services Position in the Firm: Project Engineer | Project Manager Total Years of Experience: 26 years Education: M.S. in Toxicology & Environmental Engineering | University of California Santa Cruz M.S. in Structural & Geotechnical Engineering | San Jose State University B.S. in Civil | Structural Engineering | Osmania University | San Jose state University APNGA – Certificate of Completion (Annual Refresher) Professional Affiliations: American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineers of Northern California Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Key Qualifications: Mr. Mirza is experienced in providing consulting on civil, geotechnical and environmental engineering projects. Projects mostly include geological & geotechnical field investigations, foundation analyses, recommendations, reports, pavement designs, plan reviews and coordination with the civil, structural and other disciplines in ensuring that the geotechnical requirements are incorporated into the design process and are reflected on the plans and specifications, prior to final approval. He also ensures that the established geotechnical and geological recommendations are incorporated during the construction phase and provides construction observation and testing to assure compliance to quality control and quality assurance. He also provides clients/owners/developers assistance in successful completion of the projects. Environmental projects included Phase I and Phase II investigations with soil and groundwater cleanups, assessment of the plumes, assisting in environmental audits, coordination with the regulatory agencies and project management. Experience Highlights: Project Design Engineer | Coleman Highline, Verizon Telecommunications Buildings, CA Project Design Engineer | Coleman Highline, Roku Buildings, CA Project Design Engineer | Carlysle | 22-story Mixed-use Residential Development, CA Project Design Engineer | Coleman Highline, Commercial & Retail Development, CA Project Design Engineer | Skyline College Theater Building B1, San Bruno, CA Project Design Engineer | Santa Clara University Law School Building, CA Project Design Engineer | Skyline College Building B1N, B12N & Kinesiology, CA Project Design Engineer | Canada College Building B1N (Kinesiology), CA Project Design Engineer | Outlets in Gilroy, Gilroy, CA Project Design Engineer | Old Town Los Gatos, Los Gatos, CA Project Design Engineer | McCarthy Ranch & Milpitas Square, Milpitas, Ca Project Design Engineer | Relocation Ford Creek, Milpitas, CA Project Design Engineer | Community Housing Developers Residential Towers, CA Project Design Engineer | Livingston Towers (22)-Story Residential Tower, CA Project Design Engineer | industrial infrastructure Berkeley Farms including (120)-feet high tank farm for the storage of the products, CA Project Design Engineer | Redwood City Technology Station with (3)-story below grade parking garage structure, CA Al Mirza Project Engineer | Technical Manager 253 BGCP Orange Park Clubhouse Project - CEQA Analysis Appendix D Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula at 201 W. Orange Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation Preservation Architecture, February 18, 2024) 254 1315 Walnut St., Berkeley, CA 94709 510 418 0285 mhulbert@earthlink.net February 18, 2025 Boys’ and Girls’ Club (BGC) 201 W. Orange Ave., South San Francisco Historic Resource Evaluation The purpose of the current effort is to evaluate the built resource at 201 W. Orange Ave. and to specifically determine whether there is or is not historic resource potential for project planning purposes under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As per CEQA, such a determination is based on the historical criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources. This effort has been prepared on the bases of site visits, City of South San Francisco permit research, San Mateo County records, along with applicable historical and historic architectural research, including historical newspapers, maps and directories. The 201 W. Orange Ave. site, with W. Orange Ave. (originally Third St.) to the east, C St. to the south and the rail right of way to the north, is owned by the City of South San Francisco (with the BGC as lessee) and is zoned for civic and recreational uses, thus the directly adjoining Orange Memorial Park and Centennial Way Trail, which recreational uses share the surrounding surface parking with the BGC (figs.1-2). The subject building site occupies a portion of elongated lot 11 and all of lot 15, the latter a block long sliver of land between lot 11 and the BART right-of-way (fig.3), the combined lots totaling some 90 feet in width (south-north). Summary History The subject building was developed in 1961-1962 for the Boys’ Club of South San Francisco, which organization then relocated from their previous location on Grand Avenue. Originally a boys’ club under the national Boys’ Clubs of America, since 1990, the non-profit organization has served boys and girls under the integrated Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of America (https://www.bgca.org/about-us/our- mission-story). The SSF Boys’ Club has since been the Orange Park Clubhouse of the Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of the Peninsula. The subject triangular block was first surveyed and subdivided in 1891 as lot 9 of the Town of Baden, an unincorporated community then wedged into the western side of future SSF (figs.4-5). Following SSF’s incorporation in 1908, the Town of Baden was made a subdivision and retains that label. When first constructed, the SSF Boys’ Club stood alongside the tracks and right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railway, its east side a narrow landscaped strip (fig.6). In the late-1990s, that surface trackway was replaced by the undergrounded Bay Area Rapid Transit extension to the SF International Airport, which opened in 2003. The extant east side parking was added when the rails were undergrounded in the 1990s, prior to which parking was at the rear of the BGC. Summary Descriptions (figs.7-14) Stretching along its end of the elongated site, the existing BGC building is in 3 parts. Its 2 original parts include a front (eastward) building with a mix of office, communal and recreational uses and a central part that is a high-bay gymnasium. That conjoined building, some 270 feet in length by 77 and 67 feet wide (front and rear, respectively) and with a floor area of some 16,200 square feet, was permitted in 1961 with gym revisions extending into 1962, its architect Paul D. Markling and Associates of SSF. A third and relatively small (2,400 sq.ft.) structure for storage use was appended 255 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P2 to the rear of the gym in 1968. Those 2 sets of permit drawings were reviewed by the current author at the CSSF permit center, other than which there are no other permit records for this property. Set on the west side of the curve of W. Orange Ave., the BGC site consists of a small front (east) lawn with a concrete entry path crossing its northern edge from the sidewalk to the building and continuing along the building’s east side, from where the building is accessed via several doorways, the main entry at the center of the front building’s north side. Asphalt paved parking lots fill the northern side of the site and wrap around to the rear. The buildings’ blank south side walls stand directly to the rear of a strip of adjoining properties, though the splayed south side property line leaves a shallow side setback at the front of the building. Volumetrically, all 3 building parts are flat-roofed, the front building a squat single-story (approx. 12 ft. in height) with a deep overhang and a deep fascia covering the exterior entry path along its north side; the gym building a tall 2-story box (25 ft. in height); the rear volume a 1-1/2 story box (approx. 18 ft. high). The north sides of the 2 rearward building parts have a number of openings, including several plain doors and upper windows in the gym and a couple of receiving doors in the rear structure. Otherwise, the exterior building walls are flat and plain, the gym painted stucco with, at its upper west side wall, vertical panels, the storage building concrete block. Based on the original drawings, the north side of the gym building has been much altered, including the removal of continuous clerestory windows, a canopied area with doors and windows at the west end and corrugated metal lower wall cladding. The front building alone has architectural treatments at its front and north side. The front is a mix of low volumes, one at the south end that projects forward into the yard, which volume is balanced at the north end of the front by a solid wall with an applied course-aggregate finish (stone or shell) in 6 vertical panels with wood battens. Between those forms are 4 slightly recessed window bays under a tall fascia with applied signage (“Boys and Girls Club”) separated by 3 equally wide piers of exposed concrete block. The window units are full height, aluminum framed, with fixed opaque panels in the lower two-thirds and a pair of windows above. Beneath the overhang, on the east face of which are applied building numbers (“201”), the north side of the front building has a long-panelized wall of aluminum framed wall panels that are predominately solid with a few glazed units, under a deep overhang, the pair of aluminum and glass entry doors at its center. Flanking each side of the central entry doors are stacked square-faced concrete blocks, a narrower section to the left (east) where there is an incised granite dedication plaque at its center (“Dedicated by Herbert Hoover July 26, 1961”), a broader wall to the right, the concrete blocks painted with a mural that is dated 2011. Understanding it was once more transparent and open, that is no longer the case as the building is today predominately opaque, all windows having been changed. The front originally with tall windows over small aprons, the projecting bay with 3 large units, the middle one since replaced with a solid wall, each of the other windows replaced with small units over large fixed panels. The sideward window walls were also originally continuously glazed above with small, fixed aprons below, the upper glazing since largely replaced with solid panels. So the once more open character of the design has been much altered, the architecture closed up as well as aged and dated, though it is not of course an old building. Evidently, what happens inside this building is what matters while the outside and outside spaces are unimportant. 256 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P3 Historic Context The BGC’s historic context is youth recreational facilities and, more specifically, the development of clubs organized by the Boys’ Clubs of America and, since 1990, the Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs of America, under which context there are 29 locations in San Mateo County, more than 100 Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs in California and nearly 1,000 nationwide (https://bgclubsca.com), each serving their local community. Evaluation The BGC has not previously been evaluated for historic resource eligibility. To do so for the discretionary project planning purposes, the following evaluates the subject building using the California Register (CR) evaluation criteria, listing each criterion followed by an evaluation statement based on the details reported herein. To be eligible for listing on the CR, a resource must be historically significant at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following four criteria: 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; In its development context, one directly associated event of historic interest is identifiable, the laying of the cornerstone for the new SSF Boys’ Club in July of 1961 by former U.S. President Herbert Hoover, which event was documented in news stories and which cornerstone remains on the building (figs.15-16 - though it is not in the location depicted in 1961, yet that publicity photograph may have been ceremonial or the cornerstone has since been relocated). Based on this singular historic event, the BGC meets CR criterion 1. 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; Likewise, a person of historic importance, U.S. President Herbert Hoover, is associated with the BGC’s origins. Again, based on this singular association, the BGC meets CR criterion 2. 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; Under CR criterion 3, while the frontward building has a modicum of Modern architectural design, the BGC building’s Modern design and construction lack distinction, its front building modestly rather than distinctively architectural, its original character additionally altered; the original rearward gym building literally a box from which its few modest original elements have been removed; and its later rear addition, while historically age eligible (greater than 50 years old) an even more basic concrete block box. Thus, altogether, the BGC is not potentially distinctive for design or for any potentially important or unique means of construction. The building also has no artistic value (though painted murals were added to the concrete walls flanking the entry, those date to 2011 so cannot be evaluated as potentially historic – yet which is not to dismiss their present relevance or interest). As the BGC building is typical rather than distinctive of its mid-century design and construction period while its architects – Paul D. Markling and Associates, for whom a small number of basic 257 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P4 projects are identifiable1 – were at most modestly rather than exceptionally successful, and as there is no evidence of historic artistic value (again noting the murals yet which haven’t historical potential), this individual building is of no potential historic architectural importance so does not meet CR Criterion 3. 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation; The BGC property and structure have not yielded and, beyond the content of this historical evaluation, do not appear to have the potential to yield additional prehistoric or historic information. Therefore, the subject property does not meet CR Criterion 4. In sum, relative to this modest resource, an historic event (CR criterion 1) and historically important individual (CR criterion 2) coincided with former President Herbert Hoover having presided over the BGC’s dedication ceremony in the summer of 1961. That event and person are today in evidence in the cornerstone mounted in the block wall to the left of the north side entrance, which cornerstone was pictured at the groundbreaking ceremony with President Hoover, who was a champion of the Boys’ Clubs of America (https://hoover.blogs.archives.gov/2021/08/18/herbert-hoover-and-boys- clubs-of-america). Under the CR, to achieve historic significance, the subject resource must meet criteria and also retain its historical “integrity” by which to convey its identified basis of historic importance in the present. Again, those bases are an associated historic event and an associated historic person, both dating to the BGC’s dedication on July 16, 1961. For this purpose, the California (and National) Register identifies “integrity” under seven “aspects;” location, setting, association, feeling, design, workmanship and materials. For a resource to retain integrity, the majority of these seven aspects must be substantially intact (from National Register Bulletin #15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Significance, National Park Service, 1990, pp.44-48). Relative to its cornerstone, which records the identified historic associations, historic location is intact as is historic association. Conversely, historical setting and feeling are not intact relative to the identified, focused associations as the development of the facility followed as did subsequent and substantial changes to the site, its building and surroundings. While the design and construction criterion has not been met, the BGC’s design, workmanship and materials are partly intact yet substantially changed. Altogether, again given the focused associations identified as potentially historic, only location and association are intact whereas the other 5 aspects of integrity are not. While an historic event and person are identifiably associated with the BGC, the originally modest and since substantially altered site and building do not convey those bases of significance. Rather, a singular element – a cornerstone – does so and does so literally (though, again, the cornerstone may have been relocated from its original location). Therefore, in conclusion, the BGC does not have identifiable historic importance based on the CR evaluation criteria. 1 Under Paul D. Markling, AIA (1926-2010), in the 1962 AIA Directory, several of his firm’s projects were listed: Acme Steel Products, SSF, 1960; Beau Monde Beauty Salon, 1960; office buildings, Daley City and Santa Maria, 1960; apartments, Berkeley, 1961; and the SSF Boys’ Club, 1961. 258 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P5 Signed: Mark Hulbert Preservation Architect & Historic Resources Consultant attached: figs.1-16 (pp.5-12) Fig.1 – 201 W. Orange Ave. (circled) – Location aerial (2024, Google Earth, north is up) ORA N G E A V E . GRAND AVE. HW Y . 1 0 1 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK COLMA C R . C A N A L CA L T R A I N CH E S T N U T AV E . DOWNTOWN SSF C S T . 259 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P6 Fig.2 – 201 W. Orange Ave. (highlighted) – from AP map & aerial (north at upper left) Fig.3– 201 W. Orange Ave. – Site aerial W. OR A N G E ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK AV E . CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL C ST . HW Y . 8 2 W. OR A N G E AV E . ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK C ST . 260 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P7 Fig.4 – 201 W. Orange Ave. (future, highlighted, approx.) – from 1890 map Fig.5 – 201 W. Orange Ave. (future, highlighted, approx.) – from 1894 South San Francisco Land & Improvement Co. map, with Baden subdivision outlined 261 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P8 Fig.6 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – from 1961 site plan Fig.7 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – Front (east) and part south side (figs.7-15, MH 2025) Fig.8 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – Front (east) 262 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P9 Fig.9 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – Front bldg., north side Fig.10 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – North side 263 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P10 Fig.11 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – North side and rear (west) Fig.12 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – Rear (west) 264 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P11 Fig.13 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – North side, entry area Fig.14 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – North side, entry wall with cornerstone 265 201 W. ORANGE AVE., SSF MHPA EVAL – 021825 – P12 Fig.15 – 201 W. Orange Ave. – Cornerstone Fig.16 – 201 W. Orange Ave. (future) – from the Salinas Californian, 27 July 1961, p15 266 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-829 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2b. Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to building height and recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Variance, and Design Review for the redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club facility at 201 West Orange Avenue in the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District. WHEREAS,Hunter Properties,representing Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (“applicant”)has proposed the redevelopment of the existing Orange Avenue Clubhouse with the demolition and redevelopment of two new buildings to serve a larger population of students,exterior modifications of the existing gymnasium, landscaping and circulation improvements on the property located at 201 West Orange Avenue (APNs 093-331- 110 and 093-331-150 of approximately three acres (referred to as “Project Site”) in the City; and WHEREAS,the proposed Project is located within the Parks and Recreation (PR)Zoning District and Parks and Recreation General Plan Land Use Designation; and WHEREAS,the applicant seeks entitlement approval of a Planning Project (P24-0102),including Design Review (DR24-0030), Variance (VAR25-0002), and Zoning Text Amendment (ZA25-0002) for the Project; and WHEREAS,approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project”for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS,the City,in conjunction with an environmental consultant,Lamphier-Gregory,prepared an Infill Checklist to provide substantial evidence that the proposed Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under the provision of CEQA, Class 32, Section 15332 as an Infill Development Project; and WHEREAS,the Design Review Board for the City of South San Francisco considered the Project,and recommended approval to the Planning Commission and City Council on March 18, 2025; and WHEREAS,on August 21,2025,the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the environmental effects of the Project and proposed entitlements and take public testimony; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed and carefully considered the information in the Infill Checklist,and by separate resolution,determined that the Infill Checklist is an objective and accurate document that reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the City in relation to the Project’s environmental impacts and finds that the Infill Checklist satisfies the requirements of CEQA and that the Project is City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™267 File #:25-829 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2b. impacts and finds that the Infill Checklist satisfies the requirements of CEQA and that the Project is categorically exempt under the provision of CEQA, Class 32, Section 15332; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has exercised its independent judgment and analysis,and considered all reports, recommendations, and testimony before making a determination on the Project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it,which includes without limitation,the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the South San Francisco 2040 General Plan;the South San Francisco Municipal Code;the 2040 General Plan Program EIR and Statement of Overriding Considerations;the Project applications;the project plan set prepared by Devcon Construction Incorporated dated June 12,2025;the Boys and Girls Club Project Infill Checklist,including all appendices thereto,prepared by Lamphier Gregory,dated June 2025;all site plans;all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed August 21,2025 public hearing; and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e)and §21082.2),the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS A. General Findings 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2.The Exhibits attached to this Resolution,including Conditions of Project Approval (Exhibit A),Project Plan Set (Exhibit B),Variance Justification (Exhibit C),and Draft Zoning Ordinance Amendment ( Exhibit D)are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution,as if set forth fully herein. 3.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner. 4.By a separate resolution,the Planning Commission,exercising its independent judgment and analysis, has found that the Boys and Girls Club Infill Checklist prepared for the Project is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project and no further environmental analysis would be required,and that the Project is exempt from CEQA as an Infill Development Project. B. Design Review 1.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code because the Project is an allowed use that has been designed in compliance with all applicable City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™268 File #:25-829 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2b. Zoning requirements and standards, with minor amendments proposed. 2.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed redeveloped Boys and Girls Club Clubhouse is consistent with the policies and design direction provided in the South San Francisco General Plan Parks and Recreation Land Use designation to create an area intended for parks, open space, and recreation opportunities. 3.The Project,including Design Review,is consistent with the applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council in that the proposed Project is consistent with the PR Zoning District development standards with minor amendments proposed,and the Citywide development standards,as evaluated in the Zoning Ordinance Compliance analysis for the Project. 4.The Project, including Design Review, is consistent with the Variance requirements for this project. C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 1.The Project,including the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to make a minor revision to South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.110.003 (Civic Districts -Development Standards)to allow a height exception for roof-mounted equipment screening for buildings 30’in height and less,is consistent with the adopted General Plan as it does not change the permitted land uses in any district, and is consistent with the vision of the General Plan,as it will allow for modernized construction for new facilities or redevelopment of facilities in Civic Districts. 2.The areas of the City impacted by the proposed Zoning Amendments are suitable for the proposed uses in terms of access,size of parcel,relationship to similar or related uses,and other considerations because the minor revision will not significantly alter the existing uses permitted in the Zoning Ordinance and will further ensure orderly development,consistent with Zoning Ordinance regulations for equipment screening established in SSFMC Section 20.033.012(B),Screening of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment. 3.The proposed Zoning Amendments are not detrimental to the use of land in any adjacent zone because the minor amendment will change any of the existing zoning districts,and any project in a Civic District requesting a height exception for equipment screening will be required to be consistent with Design Review criteria and the Zoning Ordinance requirements for screening established in SSFMC Section 20.033.012(B), Screening of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment. D. Variance 1.There are special circumstances applicable to the property,including its size,shape,topography, location,or surroundings,whereby the strict application of this Ordinance will deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other property of the same classification in the same zoning district as the project site includes a PG&E Easement,BART Tunnel,and BART Zone of Influence that limit developable City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™269 File #:25-829 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:2b. site includes a PG&E Easement,BART Tunnel,and BART Zone of Influence that limit developable areas and type of development,infrastructure,and improvements that may occur on the the property. Personal,financial,or family hardships do not apply in this case.Rather,the variance is required because of the existing Site Constraints,and imposition of the otherwise required interior side setback requirement would thwart the project and deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property of the same classification in the same zoning district which do not have the same site constraints. 2.Such unique circumstances were not created by the owner or applicants.These pre-existing conditions, including the PG&E Easement and the BART tunnel zone of influence have been in place for many years,long before the applicant’s lease of the property.Additionally,the existing building was constructed with a zero setback,and was consistent with the zoning regulations that were in place at the time. 3.The requested variance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated.The developable area of the property is uniquely restricted due to the existing site constraints.All other setback requirements will be met and exceeded,ensuring that the project design will not only be consistent with existing conditions, but better align with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. 4.The authorization of the variance will substantially meet the intent and purpose of the zoning district in which the subject property is located and will not be materially detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity,to adjacent property,to the neighborhood,or the public welfare in general. Redevelopment of the Boys and Girls Club Clubhouse will further the purpose and intent of the zoning district by facilitating the development of a modernized facility that better serves children and families in the community by providing improved and expanded services and programming and recreational activities. 5.By a separate resolution,the Planning Commission,exercising its independent judgment and analysis has found that the Boys and Girls Club Infill Checklist prepared for the Project is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project and no further environmental analysis would be required,and that the Project is exempt from CEQA as an Infill Development Project. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™270 Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 201 West Orange Avenue P24-0102: DR24-0030, VAR25-0002, ZA25-0002 As recommended by the Planning Commission on August 21, 2025 Introduction The term “applicant”, “developer”, “project owner” or “project sponsor” used hereinafter shall have the same meaning- the applicant for the 201 West Orange Avenue project or the property/project owner if different from applicant. GENERAL 1. The project shall be constructed and operated substantially as indicated on the plan set prepared by Devcon, dated June 12, 2025 and approved by the City Council in association with P24-1012 as amended by the conditions of approval. The final plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City’s Chief Planner. 2. The construction drawings shall comply with the City Council approved plans, as amended by the conditions of approval, including the plans prepared by Devcon, dated June 12, 2025. 3. The permit shall be subject to revocation if the project is not operated in compliance with the conditions of approval. 4. Neither the granting of this permit nor any conditions attached thereto shall authorize, require or permit anything contrary to, or in conflict with any ordinances specifically named therein. 5. Prior to construction, all required building permits shall be obtained from the City’s Building Division. 6. Demolition of any existing structures on site will require demolition permits. 7. All conditions of the permit shall be completely fulfilled to the satisfaction of the affected City Departments and Planning and Building Divisions prior to occupancy of any building. 8. Applicant shall submit a checklist showing compliance with Conditions of Approval with building permit plans application. 9. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for the construction of public improvements, the final design for all public improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and Chief Planner. 271 Page 2 10.Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for grading improvements, the applicant shall submit final grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and Chief Planner. 11.Applicant shall comply with all permitting requirements of PG&E and BART related to the project, and provide proof of permits and/or approval prior to building permit issuance for these project elements. 12.The applicant shall comply with all terms and conditions specified in the lease agreement with the City for the property. 13.Any modification to the approved plans shall be subject to SSFMC Section 20.450.012 (“Modification”), whereby the Chief Planner may approve minor changes. All exterior design modifications, including any and all utilities, shall be presented to the Chief Planner for a determination. 14.Unless the use has commenced or related building permits have been issued within two (2) years of the date this permit is granted, this permit will automatically expire on that date, subject to any extensions provided under the Subdivision Map Act or other applicable law. A one-year permit extension may be granted in accordance with provisions of the SSFMC Chapter 20.450 (Common Procedures) 15.The permit shall not be effective for any purpose until the property owner or a duly authorized representative files a signed acceptance form, prior to the issuance of a building permit, stating that the property owner is aware of, and accepts, all of the conditions of the permit. 16.Prior to scheduling a Final Inspection with the Planning Division, the applicant must submit a Planning Final Inspection Request form, which states that the project has been built according to approved plans, and any revisions have been approved by the Planning Division. CONSTRUCTION 17.The applicant is responsible for maintaining site security prior to, and throughout the construction process. This includes installation of appropriate fencing, lighting, remote monitors, or on-site security personnel as needed. 18. The applicant shall include in all building permit plans and post onsite the name and telephone number of an individual empowered to manage construction-related complaints generated from the project. The individual’s name, telephone number, and responsibility for the project shall be posted at the project site for the duration of the project in a location easily visible to the public. The individual shall record all complaints received 272 Page 3 and actions taken in response, and submit written reports of such complaints and actions to the City’s construction coordination representative on a weekly basis. 19. No construction activities (including demolition) shall occur on days that there are City events taking place in Orange Memorial Park. Schedule of events for 2025 includes September 20, October 18, and December 13. Coordinate with Parks and Recreation staff for future dates. 20. Prior to proceeding with exterior construction, the applicant shall provide a full-scale mockup of a section of exterior wall that shows the cladding materials and finishes, windows, trim, and any other architectural features of the building to fully illustrate building fenestration, subject to site inspection and approval by Planning Division staff. 21. After the building permits are approved, but before beginning construction, the owner/applicant shall hold a preconstruction conference with City Planning, Building, Fire and Engineering staff and other interested parties. The developer shall arrange for the attendance of the construction manager, contractor, and all relevant subcontractors. DESIGN REVIEW / SITE PLANNING 1. All equipment (either roof, building, or ground-mounted) shall be screened from view through the use of integral architectural elements, such as enclosures or roof screens, and landscape screening or shall be incorporated inside the exterior building wall. Equipment enclosures and/or roof screens shall be painted to match the building. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans showing utility locations, stand-pipes, equipment enclosures, landscape screens, and/or roof screens for review and approval by the Chief Planner or designee. 2. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits for landscaping improvements, the applicant shall submit final landscaping and irrigation plans for review and approval by the City’s Chief Planner. The plans shall include documentation of compliance with SSFMC Section 20.300.008, Landscaping. 3. Plant materials shall be replaced when necessary with the same species originally specified unless otherwise approved by the Chief Planner. 4. All landscape areas shall be watered via an automatic irrigation system which shall be maintained in fully operable condition at all times, and which complies with SSFMC Chapter 20.300 (Lot and Development Standards). 5. All planting areas shall be maintained by a qualified professional; the landscape shall be kept on a regular fertilization and maintenance program and shall be maintained weed free. 273 Page 4 6. Plant materials shall be selectively pruned by a qualified arborist; no topping or excessive cutting-back shall be permitted. Tree pruning shall allow the natural branching structure to develop. 7. All landscaping installed within the public right-of-way by the applicant shall be maintained by the property owner. 8. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit final landscaping and irrigation plans demonstrating compliance with the State’s Model Water Efficiency Landscaping Ordinance (MWELO), if applicable (See SSFMC Section 20.300.008, and the City’s WELO Document Verification package). a) Projects with a new aggregate landscape of 501 – 2,499 sq. ft. may comply with the prescriptive measures contained in Appendix D of the MWELO. b) Projects with a new aggregate landscape of 2,500 sq. ft. or greater must comply with the performance measures required by the MWELO. c) For all projects subject to the provisions of the MWELO, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Completion to the City, upon completion of the installation of the landscaping and irrigation system. 9. Prior to issuance of any building or construction permits, the applicant shall submit interim and final phasing plans (if applicable) and minor modifications to interim and final phasing plans for review and approval by the Chief Planner, City Engineer and Chief Building Official. 10. The applicant shall contact the South San Francisco Scavenger Company to properly size any required trash enclosures and work with staff to locate and design the trash enclosure in accordance with the SSFMC Section 20.300.014, Trash and Refuse Collection Areas. Applicant shall submit an approval letter from South San Francisco Scavenger to the Chief Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Landscaped areas in the project area may contain trees defined as protected by the South San Francisco Tree Preservation Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30. Any removal or pruning of protected trees shall comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and applicant shall obtain a permit for any tree removals or alterations of protected trees, and avoid tree roots during trenching for utilities. 12. Permanent project signage is not included in project entitlements. Prior to installation of any project signage, the applicant shall submit an appropriate sign application per Chapter 20.360 of the Zoning Ordinance for review and approval. 274 Page 5 TRANSPORTATION / PARKING 13. A Parking and Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the project shall be submitted with the application for Building Permit, for review and approval by the Chief Planner and City Engineer. 14. Provide clear signage on site for residential, commercial, and visitor parking areas to help direct vehicle traffic. For questions regarding Planning Division COAs, please contact Adena Friedman at adena.friedman@ssf.net or (650) 877-8535. 275 Page 6 ENGINEERING DIVISION Permits 1. At the time of each permit submittal, the Applicant shall submit a deposit for each of the following permit reviews and processing: a. Building Permit plan check and civil review. Provide an engineer’s estimate or opinion of probable cost of on-site improvements for deposit amount calculation. b. Hauling/Grading plan check and permit processing. Provide Cubic Yards for deposit amount calculation. c. Encroachment for Public Improvements plan check and permit processing. Provide an engineer’s estimate or opinion of probable cost of ROW improvements for fees and deposits amount calculation. 2. A Grading Permit is required for grading over 50 cubic yards and if 50 cubic yards or more of soil is exported and/or imported. The Applicant shall pay all permit and inspection fees, as well as any deposits and/or bonds required to obtain said permits. The Grading Permit requires several documents to be submitted for the City’s review and approval. The Grading Permit Application, Checklist and Requirements may be found on the City website at http://www.ssf.net/departments/public-works/engineering-division. 3. A Hauling Permit shall be required for excavations and off-haul or on-haul, per Engineering requirements; should hauling of earth occur prior to grading. Otherwise, hauling conditions would be included with the grading permit. Hauling Permit may be found on the City website at: http://www.ssf.net/departments/public-works/engineering-division. 4. The City of South San Francisco is mandated by the State of California to divert sixty-five percent (65%) of all solid waste from landfills either by reusing or recycling. To help meet this goal, a city ordinance requires completion of a Waste Management Plan (“WMP”) for covered building projects identifying how at least sixty-five percent (65%) of non-inert project waste materials and one hundred percent (100%) of inert materials (“65/100”) will be diverted from the landfill through recycling and salvage. The Contractor shall submit a WMP application and fee payment prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 5. An Encroachment Permit is required for any work proposed within the public right-of-way. The Applicant shall pay all permit, plan check, and inspection fees, as well as, any deposits and/or bonds required to obtain said permits. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit written evidence from the County or State Regulators in charge, indicating that the site is cleared of hazardous materials and hazardous groundwater to a level that poses no impacts to human health. The Applicant shall also confirm that any existing groundwater monitoring wells on the project site have been properly closed and/or relocated as necessary as approved by the County or State Regulators in charge. Plan Submittal 7. The Applicant shall submit detailed plans printed to PDF and combined into a single electronic file, with each being stamped and digitally signed by a Professional Engineer registered in the 276 Page 7 State of California. Incorporated within the construction plans shall be applicable franchise utility installation plans, stamped and signed and prepared by the proper authority. Plans shall include the following sheets; Cover, Separate Note Sheet, Existing Conditions, Demolition Plan, Grading Plan, Horizontal Plan, Striping and Signage Plan, Utility Plan(s), Detail Sheet(s), Erosion Control Plan, and Landscape Plans, (grading, storm drain, erosion control, and landscape plans are for reference only and shall not be reviewed during this submittal). 8. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall obtain a grading permit with the Engineering Division and shall submit an application, all documentation, fees, deposits, bonds and all necessary paperwork needed for the grading permit. The Applicant shall submit a grading plan that clearly states the amount of cut and fill required to grade the project. The Grading Plans shall include the following plans: Cover, Notes, Existing Conditions, Grading Plans, Storm Drain Plans, Stormwater Control Plan, and Erosion Control Plan. 9. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit for all proposed work within the City ROW and shall submit an application, all documentation, fees, deposits, bonds and all necessary paperwork needed for the Encroachment Permit. Applicant shall prepare and submit a separate Public Improvement Plan set that shall include only the scope of work within the City ROW (with reference to the on-site plans) consisting of the following plans: Civil Plans, Landscape Plans, and Joint Trench Plans. An engineer’s cost estimate for the scope of work shown on the approved Public Improvement Plans is required to determine the performance and payment bond amount. The submittal of the bonds is required prior to the execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. 10. All improvements shall be designed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the Engineering Division. 11. The Engineering Division reserves the right to include additional conditions during review of the building permit, grading permit, or encroachment permit. Mapping and Agreements 12. All required public easement dedications to the City on the project site shall be accepted by the City and recorded with the San Mateo County Recorder’s Office prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 13. Prior to the approval of any Permits, the Applicant shall enter into an Improvement Agreement and Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement with the City. These agreements shall be approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer prior to execution. a. The Improvement Agreement shall require the Applicant to ensure the faithful performance of the design, construction, installation and inspection of all public improvements as reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division at no cost to the City and shall be secured by good and sufficient payment, performance, and one (1) year warranty bonds or cash deposit adequate to cover all of the costs, inspections and administrative expenses of completing such improvements in the 277 Page 8 event of a default. The value of the bonds or cash deposit shall include 110% of the cost of construction based on prevailing wage rates. The value of the warranty bond or cash deposit shall be equivalent to 10% of the value of the performance security. b. The Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement shall require the Applicant to maintain any street furniture that serves the property and all landscape within the project frontage at no cost to the City. The Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the San Mateo County Recorder and may be transferred to the property owner. 14. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall record a 5’ wide utility easement over the City of South San Francisco property along the West Orange Avenue frontage of the property, to accommodate the installation of public and private utilities (by others). Right-of-Way 15. Prior to building permit issuance and prior to any work within the City Right-of-Way, the Applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Engineering Division. All new public improvements required to accommodate the development shall be installed at no cost to the City and shall be approved by the City Engineer and constructed to City Standards. All new public improvements shall be completed prior to Final Occupancy of the project or prior to any Temporary Occupancy as approved by the City Engineer. 16. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the Applicant shall submit a video survey of the adjacent streets (perimeter of proposed property location) to determine the pre-construction condition of the streets at no cost to the City. The Applicant will be responsible to ensure that the condition of the streets and striping is in at least existing condition or better after construction is completed. 17. All internal driveways must comply with City of South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.330.010. One-way travel lanes must be clearly marked and signed accordingly. Internal driveways that also function as Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) routes must be at least 20 feet wide. 18. "The Applicant shall reconstruct the existing driveway apron on Orange Avenue to comply with current City Standards conforming to ADA requirements. The reconstructed driveway shall include detectible warnings on each approach. 19. The Applicant shall reconstruct the existing driveway/parking lot entrance on C Street. 20. Upon completion of construction and landscape work at the site, the Applicant shall clean, repair or reconstruct, at their expense, as required to conform to City Standards, all public improvements including driveways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street pavements along the street frontages of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Damage to adjacent property caused by the Applicant, or their contractors or subcontractors, shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the affected property owner and the City Engineer, at no cost to the City or to the property owner. 278 Page 9 21. Applicant shall ensure that any pavement markings impacted during construction are restored and upgraded to meet current City standards current to the time of Encroachment Permit approval. 22. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all street trees and landscaped irrigation systems installed within the Public right-of-way. 23. Prior to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit, the Applicant shall provide an engineer’s estimate for all work performed with in the public right-of-way and submit a bond equal to 110% of the estimate. 24. Prior to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit, the Applicant shall submit Traffic and Pedestrian Control Plans for proposed work on West Orange Avenue and/or any area of work that will obstruct the existing pedestrian walkways. 25. No private foundation or private retaining wall support shall extend into the City Right-of- Way without express approval from the Engineering Department. Applicant shall design any bioretention area or flow-through planters adjacent to the property line such that the facility and all foundations do not encroach within the City Right-of-Way or into an adjacent parcel. 26. Applicant shall ensure that any pavement markings impacted during construction are restored and upgraded to meet City standards current to the time of Encroachment Permit approval. 27. The project shall not include any permanent structural supports (retaining walls, tiebacks, etc.) within the ROW. City Engineer approval is required for any temporary structural supports within the ROW. Any temporary structural supports shall be removed after construction. 28. Any work within the public sidewalk and/or obstructing pedestrian routes shall require pedestrian routing plans along with traffic control plans. Temporary lane or sidewalk closures shall be approved by the City Engineer and by the Construction Coordination Committee (if within the CCC influence area). For any work affecting the sidewalks or pedestrian routes greater than 2 days in duration, the adjacent parking lane or adjacent travel lane shall be closed and temporary vehicle barriers placed to provide a protected pedestrian corridor. Temporary ramps shall be constructed to connect the pedestrian route from the sidewalk to the street if no ramp or driveway is available to serve that purpose. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with Scavenger and submit all garbage related plans. Stormwater 30. The Applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a storm drainage and hydraulic study for the fully improved development analyzing existing conditions and post-development conditions. The study shall confirm that the proposed development will meet the goal of reducing peak runoff by 15% based on a 25-year, 5-minute design storm for each drainage basin or subwatershed within the project site. Methods for reducing stormwater flow shall include stormwater storage on-site if necessary. The study shall also evaluate the capacity of each new storm drain installed as part of the development. Precipitation shall be based on NOAA Atlas 14 data for the site. The study shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 31. On-site storm drainage conveyance systems shall be designed to accommodate the 10-year design storm. Precipitation used for the hydraulic analysis shall be based on NOAA Atlas 14 279 Page 10 data for the project site. Storm duration shall be equal to the time of concentration with an initial minimum of 10 minutes. 32. Hydraulic Grade lines shall not be less than 1 foot from the ground surface. 33. Runoff Coefficients used for hydraulic calculations shall be as follows: a. Pervious areas—0.35 b. Impervious areas—0.95 34. Drainage runoff shall not be allowed to flow across lot lines or across subdivision boundaries onto adjacent private property without an appropriate recorded easement being provided for this purpose. 35. All off-site upgrades to drainage facilities required by the City Engineer to accommodate the runoff from the subdivision shall be provided by the Applicant at no cost to the City. 36. All building downspouts shall be connected to rigid pipe roof leaders which shall discharge into an approved drainage device or facility that meets the C3 stormwater treatment requirements of Municipal Regional Permit. 37. All storm drainage runoff shall be discharged into a pipe system or concrete gutter. Runoff shall not be surface drained into surrounding private property or public streets. 38. Existing on-site drains that are not adequately sized to accommodate run-off from the fully developed property and upstream drainage basin shall be improved as required by the Applicant’s civil engineering consultant’s plans and specifications as approved by the City Engineer. These on-site improvements shall be installed at no cost to the City. 39. The on-site storm drainage system shall not be dedicated to the City for ownership or maintenance. The storm drainage system and any storm water pollutions control devices within the subdivision shall be owned, repaired, and maintained by the property owner or Homeowner’s Association. Sanitary Sewer 40. Applicant shall video inspect the City sanitary sewer mains along the project frontage to the nearest manholes upstream and downstream of the project point of connection both prior to construction and post construction. The video must be submitted to City Engineering for review as part of the improvement plans submittal and shall confirm the number of existing sewer laterals serving the site that must be abandoned. 41. The Applicant shall abandon all existing private sewer laterals from the project site connected to the sanitary sewer system. The number of sewer laterals to be abandoned shall be shown on the plans and shall be confirmed by the review of a video inspection of the private sanitary sewer main. 42. The Applicant shall install new sewer lateral to City Standards. 43. The Sanitary Sewer plans shall show all existing and proposed utilities. Be sure to provide minimum horizontal and vertical clearances for all existing and proposed utilities. Also include all existing and proposed manhole, catch basin and pipe invert elevations. 44. All utility crossings shall be potholed, verified and shown on the plans prior to the building 280 Page 11 permit submittal. 45. The on-site sanitary sewer system/plumbing shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code, as amended and adopted by the City, and in accordance with the requirements of the South San Francisco Building Division. 46. Each on-site sanitary sewer manhole and cleanout shall be accessible to maintenance personnel and equipment via pathway or driveways as appropriate. Each maintenance structure shall be surrounded by a level pad of sufficient size to provide a safe work area. 47. The on-site sanitary sewer system up to the public sanitary sewer manhole connection shall not be dedicated to the City for maintenance. The sanitary sewer facilities within the subdivision shall be repaired and maintained by the property owner Homeowner’s Association. Dry Utilities 48. All electrical and communication lines serving the property shall be placed underground within the property being developed and to the nearest overhead facility or underground utility vault. Pull boxes, junction structures, vaults, valves, and similar devices shall not be installed within pedestrian walkway areas. 49. The proposed transformer along the project frontage on Orange Avenue shall be properly screened with landscaping or other measures to the satisfaction of the Engineering and Planning Division. Domestic Water 50. The Applicant shall be responsible to coordinate with California Water Service (Calwater) do determine if their existing public water distribution system has the capacity to serve the development. Any off-site water system improvements that may be needed, as determined by Calwater, will be the responsibility of the Applicant at the Applicant’s expense. 51. The Applicant shall coordinate with the California Water Service (Calwater) for all water-related issues. All on-site private water mains and services shall be installed to the standards of Calwater at the expense of the applicant. 52. The Applicant shall install fire hydrants at the locations specified by the Fire Marshal. Installation shall be in accordance with City Standards as administered by the Fire Marshal. On-site Improvements 53. The Applicant shall obtain approval from BART and SamTrans of any modifications to the parking areas on BART and SamTrans property. 54. During construction, the Applicant shall provide continuous access to BART property and dog park, including provisions for parking designated for their use. 55. Any modifications to public access shall be reviewed and approved by the City of South San Francisco, BART, and SamTrans. 281 Page 12 56. Internal driveways shall be a minimum of 15-feet wide for one-way travel and 25-feet wide for areas subject to two-way travel. One-way travel lanes within the site shall be clearly posted and marked appropriately. 57. Staging or storing of trash bins shall not be permitted on Public right-of-way. 58. The Applicant shall submit a construction access plan that clearly identifies all areas of proposed access during the proposed development. 59. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy form the Building Division, the Applicant shall require its Civil Engineer to inspect the finished grading surrounding the building and to certify that it conforms to the approved site plan and that there is positive drainage away from the exterior of the building. The Applicant shall make any modifications to the grading, drainage, or other improvements required by the project engineer to conform to intent of his plans. 60. The Applicant shall submit a proposed workplan and intended methodologies to ensure any existing structures on or along the development’s property line are protected during proposed activities. 61. All common areas are to be landscaped and irrigated and shall meet the requirements of the City’s Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (WELO). Submit landscape, drainage and grading plans for review and approval by the Engineering Division. 62. Any monument signs to be installed for the project shall be located completely on private property and shall not encroach into the City’s right-of-way. The Developer shall ensure that placement of the monument signs do not obstruct clear lines of sight for vehicles entering or exiting the site. Grading 63. The recommendations contained within the geotechnical report shall be included in the Site Grading and Drainage Plan. The Site Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared by the developer’s civil engineer and approved by the project geotechnical engineer. 64. During grading operations, the entire project site shall be adequately sprinkled with water to prevent dust or sprayed with an effect dust palliative to prevent dust from being blown into the air and carried onto adjacent private and public property. Dust control shall be for seven days a week and 24 hours a day. Should any problems arise from dust, the developer shall hire an environmental inspector at his/her expense to ensure compliance with the grading permit. 65. Haul roads within the City of South San Francisco shall be cleaned daily, or more often, as required by the City Engineer, of all dirt and debris spilled or tracked onto City streets or private driveways. 66. The Applicant shall submit a winterization plan for all undeveloped areas within the site to control silt and stormwater runoff from entering adjacent public or private property. This plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to September 1 of each year. The approved plan shall be implemented prior to November 1 of each year. 67. Prior to placing any foundation concrete, the Applicant shall hire a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying to certify that the new foundation forms conform with all setbacks from confirmed property lines as shown on the Plans. A letter certifying the foundation forms shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. 282 Page 13 68. The applicant is required by ordinance to provide for public safety and the protection of public and private property in the vicinity of the land to be graded from the impacts of the proposed grading work. 69. All hauling and grading operations are restricted to between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for residential areas and 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for industrial/commercial areas, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. 70. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no grading in excess of 200 cubic yards shall be accomplished between November 1 and May 1 of each year. For questions regarding Engineering Division COAs, please contact Anthony Schaffer at Anthony.schaffer@ssf.net or (650) 829-6667. 283 Page 14 FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT NUMBER: P24-0102 PROJECT ADDRESS: 201 W Orange REVIEWED BY: Ian Hardage, Battalion Chief Fire Marshal After reviewing the proposed application and plans provided for this project, the Fire Department has the following comments. This plan is being APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOTED BELOW. 1. Projects shall be designed in compliance with established regulations adopted by the City of South San Francisco affecting or related to structures, processes, premises, and safeguards in effect at the time of building permit application. 2. Fire service features for buildings, structures and premises shall comply with all City adopted building standards in effect at the time of building permit application. 3. Permit(s) shall be required as set forth in adopted California Building Code (CBC) Section 105 and California Fire Code (CFC) Sections 105.5 and 105.6. Submittal documents consisting of construction documents, statement of special inspection, geotechnical report, referenced documents, and other data shall be submitted electronically with each permit application. The construction documents shall be prepared by a registered design professional. Where special conditions exist, the code official is authorized to require additional construction documents to be prepared by a registered design professional. 4. Construction documents shall be to scale (graphic scale required on all plan sheets), dimensioned and drawn on suitable electronic media. Construction documents shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of adopted codes and relevant laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, as determined by the fire code official. 5. Shop/construction drawings for the fire protection system(s) and other hazardous operations regulated by the fire department shall be submitted directly to the Fire Department to indicate conformance with adopted codes and standards. The construction documents shall be approved prior to the start of system installation. 6. The construction documents submitted with the application for permit shall be accompanied by a site plan showing to scale the size and location of new construction and existing structures on the site, distances from lot lines, the established street grades and the proposed finished grades and it shall be drawn in accordance with an accurate boundary line survey. In the case of demolition, the site plan shall show construction to be demolished and the location and size of existing structure and construction that are to remain on the site or plot. 7. Where fire apparatus access roads or a water supply for fire protection are required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. 8. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to premises on which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction, in accordance with CFC Section 507, Appendices B & C. a. Fire-flow requirements for buildings or portions of buildings and facilities shall be determined by adopted CFC Appendix B and SSF Municipal Code. 284 Page 15 b. Fire hydrant systems shall comply with adopted CFC Section 507.5.1 through 507.5.8 and Appendix C. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the owner or owner’s authorized agent shall be responsible for the development, implementation, and maintenance of an approved written site safety plan approved by the fire code official in accordance with CBC & CFC Chapter 33. 10. Prior to issuance of building permits, in accordance with CFC Section 105.6 the fire code official shall have the authority to require fire construction permit documents and calculations for all fire protection and life safety systems and to require permits be issued for the installation, rehabilitation or modification of any fire protection and life safety systems. Construction documents for fire protection and life safety systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to system installation. Only the following fire construction permits are approved for deferred submittal: (1) Automatic fire extinguishing systems, (2) Emergency responder communication coverage system (ERCCS), and (3) Fire alarm and detection systems and related equipment. 11. Fire apparatus access roads shall be approved by the fire code official, installed and maintained in accordance with CFC Section 503 and Appendix D. a. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes and standards at time of building permit application. i. Traffic calming measures (bollards, speed cushions, humps, undulations, etc.) are prohibited unless approved by the fire code official. ii. Should a security gate(s) be planned to serve the facility, they shall be automatic and approved by the fire code official prior to installation. b. Required Fire Department access roads shall be signed “No Parking – Fire Lane” per current Fire Department standards and California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22500. 12. Prior to the issuance of any building or construction permits for the construction of public improvements, the final design for all public improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and Chief Planner. For questions concerning Fire Department COAs, please contact Ian Hardage at ian.hardage@ssf.net or (650) 829-6645. 285 Page 16 BUILDING DIVISION This project is being returned as approved with condition – The following items may have influences on the project. 1. Provide separate Demo permit for the project. 2. Provide J permit from Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 3. Provide project to full compliance with 2022 California Building Code 11B Accessibility. 4. Provide project to comply with Stormwater Pollution Prevent, 2022 California Energy Code and 2022 California Green Code. Note: May have more comments during plan check. Thank You! For questions concerning Building Division COAs, please contact Gary Lam at gary.lam@ssf.net or (650) 829-6683. 286 Page 17 WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Project: P24-0102 201 West Orange Ave APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - the following items must be included in the plans or are requirements of the Water Quality Control Stormwater and/or Pretreatment Programs and must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Storm drains must be protected during construction. Discharge of any demolition/construction debris or water to the storm drain system is prohibited. 2. Do not use gravel bags for erosion control in the street or drive aisles. Drains in street must have inlet and throat protection of a material that is not susceptible to breakage from vehicular traffic. 3. No floatable bark shall be used in landscaping. Only fibrous mulch or pea gravel is allowed. 4. After 7/1/19, Demolition Projects must complete a PCBs Screening Assessment Form (attached and available in Building Division). If screening determines the building is an applicable structure, the Protocol for Evaluating PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition shall be followed. Submit a PCB screening package for each address/building containing: 1.) PCBs Screening Form 2.) QAQC checklist 3.) Contractor’s Report 4.) Analytical Results (if applicable) 5. If PCBs Screening and Assessment result in any materials containing PCBs in concentrations > 50 ppm, appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) from the attached Specified BMPs for Demolition Projects will be required on the Erosion Control Plan (submitted as part of plan set) and on site until completion of the demolition process (including Erosion Control, Sediment Control, and management of Dust, Waste, Materials and Non-stormwater). 6. As site falls in a Moderate Trash Generation area per South San Francisco’s ATTACHED Trash Generation Map (http://www.flowstobay.org/content/municipal- trash-generation-maps), determined by the Water Quality Control Division: 287 Page 18 -Regional Water Quality Control Board-approved full trash capture devices must be installed to treat the stormwater drainage from the site. -At a minimum, a device must be installed before the onsite drainage enters the City’s public stormwater system (i.e. trash capture must take place no farther downstream than the last private stormwater drainage structure on the site). -A full trash capture system is any single device or series of devices that traps all particles retained by a 5 mm mesh screen and has a design treatment capacity of not less than the peak flow rate resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm in the sub-drainage area or designed to carry at least the same flow as the storm drain connected to the inlet. 7. Roof leaders/gutters must NOT be plumbed directly to storm drains; they shall discharge to stormwater treatment devices or landscaping first. 8. Fire sprinkler test drainage must be plumbed to sanitary sewer and be clearly shown on plans. 9. Trash enclosure shall be covered (roof, canopy) and contained (wall/fence). Floor shall slope to a central drain that discharges to the sanitary sewer system. If food prep to be involved, the central drain shall first discharge to a grease trap/interceptor and then connect to the sanitary sewer. Details of trash enclosure shall be clearly provided on plans. 10. Install a condensate drain line connected to the sanitary sewer for rooftop equipment and clearly show on plans. 11. If a food service kitchen/ prep area is to be installed, it shall connect to a gravity grease interceptor at least 1000 gallons (liquid capacity) in size. Sizing of the grease removal device must be in accordance with the uniform plumbing code. 12. Grease interceptor shall be connected to all non-domestic wastewater sources in the kitchen (wash sinks, mop sinks, floor drains) and shown on plans. 13. A cut sheet of the Grease Interceptor/Trap must be shown on plans. 14. Garbage Disposals in Industrial/Commercial facilities are prohibited by City of South San Francisco Municipal Code. Do not include/Remove Garbage Disposal(s) in plans. 15. Submit facility square footage on plans, including square footage/use of any previous buildings on site and square footage/use of proposed buildings for site. Applicant will be required to pay a Sewer Capacity Fee (connection fee) based on SSF City Council- approved EDU calculation (involving anticipated flow, BOD and TSS calculations and including credits for previous site use). 288 Page 19 16. Elevator sump drainage (if applicable) shall be connected to an oil/water separator prior to connection to the sanitary sewer. 17. Wherever feasible, install landscaping that minimizes irrigation runoff, promotes surface infiltration, minimizes use of pesticides and fertilizers and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping programs (such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping). 18. Site is subject to C.3 requirements of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (please see SMCWPPP C.3 Regulated Projects Guide at https://www.flowstobay.org/newdevelopment for guidance). C.3 compliance will be reviewed by the City’s consultant and the following items will be required; 19. Applicant shall provide 100% Low-Impact Development for C.3 stormwater treatment for all of the project’s impervious areas per MRP Section C.3.b. In-lieu of feasible on-site treatment, qualifying applicants may apply for the Special Project Status exemption per Provision C.3.e.ii to Low Impact Development for C.3 treatment. However, the applicant must provide a complete Infeasibility Narrative establishing all of the following (while still treating as much of the runoff via LID onsite as possible): a. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite; b. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures offsite within South San Francisco, providing LID treatment of an equivalent amount of runoff either at a: i. Available Regional Stormwater Project in same watershed ; ii. Property owned by the project proponent in the same watershed; or iii. Planned South San Francisco Green Infrastructure (GI) Stormwater Project. 1. Project options to be made available by City Engineering staff upon request c. Infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage area with some combination of LID treatment measures onsite, offsite or at a Regional Project in the same watershed; d. Infeasibility of installing LID treatment within the Right-of-Way. If Applicant chooses to treat any of their Project’s impervious areas within the ROW, Applicant shall size the treatment measures to treat both the Project’s impervious areas and the ROW. The ROW area to be treated shall be from the property line to the street centerline or crown whichever is a greater distance along the entire project frontage. 289 Page 20 Sizing and design shall conform to the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program design templates and technical guidance and be approved by the Water Quality Control Plant and the Engineering Division. Applicant shall maintain all treatment measures required by the project and enter into a Stormwater Treatment Measure Maintenance Agreement with the City. 20. Completed attached forms for Low Impact Development (C3-C6 Project Checklist). Forms must be on 8.5in X 11in paper and signed and wet stamped by a professional engineer. Calculations must be submitted with this package. Use updated forms for completing documents, as old forms are no longer sufficient Forms can also be found at http://www.flowstobay.org/newdevelopment A completed copy must also be emailed to andrew.wemmer @ssf.net 21. Sign and have engineer wet stamp forms for Low Impact Development. 22. Submit flow calculations and related math for LID. 23. The onsite catch basins are to be stenciled with the approved San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Logo (No Dumping! Flows to Bay). 24. Landscaping shall meet the following conditions related to reduction of pesticide use on the project site: a. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat stormwater runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain, and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolonged exposure to water shall be specified. b. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. c. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent practicable. d. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. e. Integrated pest management (IPM) principles and techniques shall be encouraged as part of the landscaping design to the maximum extent practicable. Examples of IPM principles and techniques include: 290 Page 21 i. Select plants that are well adapted to soil conditions at the site. ii. Select plants that are well adapted to sun and shade conditions at the site. In making these selections, consider future conditions when plants reach maturity, as well as seasonal changes. iii. Provide irrigation appropriate to the water requirements of the selected plants. iv. Select pest-resistant and disease-resistant plants. v. Plant a diversity of species to prevent a potential pest infestation from affecting the entire landscaping plan. vi. Use “insectary” plants in the landscaping to attract and keep beneficial insects. 25. A SWPPP must be submitted (if > 1 acre). Drawings must note that erosion control shall be in effect all year long. 26. A copy of the state approved NOI must be submitted (if > 1 acre). For questions concerning Water Quality Control Division COAs, please contact Andrew Wemmer with any questions at Andrew.Wemmer@ssf.net or (650) 829-3840. 291 292 293 294 ELEVATION KEY DOOR TAG DRAWING SHEET NUMBER DRAWING SHEET NUMBER BUILDING SECTION NUMBER DETAIL CUT NUMBER ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER DRAWING SHEET NUMBER PLAN DETAIL NUMBER PLAN REGION Room name 101 1 3 24 1 A101 1 A101 1 A101 202A DRAWING SHEET NUMBER DETAIL CUT NUMBER1 A101 BLDG APN 093-331-150APN 093-331-110 SITE DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:16:38 PM A0.00 COVER SHEET PLANNING 2/21/2025 1 ALL PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 2 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL ALWAYS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE DIMENSIONS INFORM THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 3 DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON ARCH. PLANS ARE TO FACE OF WOOD STUD/CENTERLINE OF METAL STUD, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR INDICATED. 4 DIMENSIONS MARKED +/- ARE FLEXIBLE AND CAN CHANGE AS REQ'D. TO FIT. DIMENSIONS NOT SO MARKED SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER +/- DIMENSIONS. 5 REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS TO ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. 6 VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, SITE DIMENSIONS, AND GRADES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AT ONCE. 7 SITE ACCESSIBILITY IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIF. TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS, TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. IF NEEDED APPLICABLE PLANS, DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION 8 CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY: 9 CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALL BE DONE WITH APPROVAL AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY CO. REQUIREMENTS. 10 CONTRACTORS SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL DURING CONSTRUCTION. THEY SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION AT THEIR EXPENSE. 11 DO NOT CONNECT OR SUSPEND ANY ITEM FROM STRUCTURE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PARTITION CONNECTION & ANCHORING TO FIRE SAFING IS NOT ALLOWED. 12 WORK MAY BE OBSERVED BY THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVES FOR CONFORMITY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SCOPE OF WORK. WORK COVERED OR CONCEALED BEFORE BEING OBSERVED SHALL BE OPENED AND UNCOVERED UPON REQUEST. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER OF ALL REQUIRED OBSERVATIONS IN ADVANCE. NO ALLOWANCE SHALL SUBSEQUENTLY BE MADE IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BEHALF FOR ANY NEGLECT IN ADHERING TO THIS REQUIREMENT. 13 FOR METAL STUD INTERIOR PARTITION WALL SIZE, GAUGE AND SPACING, SEE WALL DETAILS AND SCHEDULE. 14 GYPSUM BOARD FOR NON-FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS TO BE 5/8" THICK U.N.O. 15 GYPSUM BOARD FOR FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS TO BE TYPE 'X' 5/8" THICK U.N.O. 16 ALL FIRE RESISTIVE PARTITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ULTESTING REQUIREMENTS AND MANUFACTURER'S RECOMENDATIONS FOR CONDITIONS AS REQUIRED. 17 USE 5/8" THICK MOISTURE RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD AT ALL WALLS IN TOILET ROOMS AND SHOWER AREAS AND AT ALL WALLS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE CERAMIC TILES. 18 ALL DUCT AND CONDUIT PENETRATIONS THROUGH PARTITIONS SHALL BE FIRE SEALED OR ACOUSTICAL SEALED. 19 ALL SHAFT ENCLOSURES CONTAINING AIR NOT IN DUCTS SHALL BE SEALED AIRTIGHT. 20 TAPE, BED AND FINISH ALL DRYWALL CORNERS AND JOINTS READY FOR FINISH. 21 HEIGHT OF FURNITURE PARTITIONS IN OPEN OFFICE AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED 5'-9". 22 LIGHT SWITCH/MOTION SENSOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN APPROPRIATE GANG BOX TO MEET TITLE 24. 23 ALL RECEPTACLES & PHONE/DATA JACKS SHALL BE STANDARD PLATES IN MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD TRIM COLOR, TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT, MOUNTED VERTICALLY LEVEL WITH ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES. U.N.O. 24 EXIT SIGNAGE TO BE GREEN LED. IN WHITE THERMOPLASTIC HOUSING. T.I. TO MATCH SHELL STANDARD. GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS JAN JANITOR LAM LAMINATE LAV LAVATORY LT LIGHT MAX MAXIMUM MEZZ MEZZANINE MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MO MASONRY OPENING MTL METAL NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OD OVERFLOW DRAIN OFOI OWNER FURNISHED, OWNER INSTALLED OH OPPOSITE HAND OPNG OPENING R RADIUS RD ROOF DRAIN REF REFERENCE REQ'D REQUIRED RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING SAF SELF ADHERED FLASHING SBO SUPPLIED BY OWNER SCD SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS SCH SCHEDULE SED SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS SHT SHEET SHWR SHOWER SIM SIMILAR SLD SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SMD SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SOG SLAB ON GRADE SPEC SPECIFIC SQ SQUARE SS SANITARY SEWER SS STAINLESS STEEL SSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE SUSP SUSPENDED T&B TOP & BOTTOM TBD TO BE DETERMINED TEL TELEPHONE TEMP TEMPORARY TO TOP OF TYP TYPICAL UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W WIDE W/ WITH WC WATER CLOSET WC WALL COVERING & AND (E) EXISTING (N) NEW @ AT A/C AIR CONDITIONING AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACC ACCESSIBLE ACOUS ACOUSTICAL ADJ ADJUSTABLE AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM ARCH ARCHITECT BLK'G BLOCKING BM BEAM BO BOTTOM OF BOT BOTTOM BSMT BASEMENT CIP CAST IN PLACE CL CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR CO CLEAN OUT CONT CONTINUOUS CT CERAMIC TILE DET DETAIL DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DISP DISPENSER DN DOWN EA EACH EL ELEVATION EQ EQUAL EXT EXTERIOR FD FLOOR DRAIN FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FF FINISH FLOOR FL FLOOR FLUOR FLUORESCENT FO FACE OF FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FOP FACE OF PLY FOS FACE OF STUD FR FIRE RESISTIVE FS FINISH CONCRETE SURFACE FURR FURRING GA GAUGE GL GLASS GSM GALVANIZED SHEET METAL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD HDW HARDWARE HDWD HARDWOOD HM HOLLOW METAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR PROJECT SUMMARY ALL WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE W/ THE FOLLOWING CODES AND REGULATIONS AS APPROVED & AMENDED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO: CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24 (CCR); CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE: 2022 EDITION CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: 2022 EDITION ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN: 2022 EDITION *IT IS THE INTENTION THAT THE ABOVE CODES & REGULATIONS REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OR REVISION IN FORCE ON THE DATE OF THESE DRAWINGS. CODE COMPLIANCE & STANDARDS HISTORY: The Orange Park Clubhouse of the Boys and Girls Clubs of the Peninsula (BGCP) has been operational on this site since the early 1960’s in a 3-building campus serving approximately 200 K-8 students. Building 1 is currently a single-story academic clubhouse and main entry, adjoining Building 2, the high bay gymnasium which includes a small two-story auxiliary classroom, office and storage space. Building 2 adjoins Building 3, a small single story CMU structure. The buildings are located on City owned land with a common City owned and maintained parking lot also serving the adjacent Orange Memorial Park. A BART tunnel is located within the zone of influence of the building footprints. PROPOSED PROJECT: This project addresses BGCP’s desire to improve their current space while expanding their coverage to include an additional 150 high school students, reaching a total of 350 K-HS students. Buildings 1 and 3 are proposed to be demolished and replaced with new 2-story wood framed buildings of a slightly larger footprint. Building 1 would serve K-8 and house the kitchen, cafeteria and an adjacent secure outdoor play/eating area. Building 3 would serve high school students and includes a secure flexible outdoor space for quiet enjoyment. Both buildings would internally access the existing Building 2 Gymnasium. Building 2 scope is yet to be determined and is currently assumed to be limited to cosmetic improvements (not included in this drawing package). Proposed site improvements include re-striping the existing parking lot to gain additional stalls, widening the perimeter concrete walkway, addressing accessibility per current code requirements, utility infrastructure improvements, adding a trash enclosure, replacing the wood good neighbor fence at the northwestern property line as well as the forementioned secure outdoor spaces. INDEX OF DRAWINGS VICINITY MAP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA LANGAN ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE GENERAL CONTRACTOR DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. ARCHITECT OF RECORD DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. 690 GIBRALTAR DRIVE MILPITAS, CA 95035 PHONE: (408) 519-8317 FAX: (408) 262-2342 CONTACT: MICHELLE NEY EMAIL: MNEY@DEVCON-CONST.COM 690 GIBRALTAR DRIVE MILPITAS, CA 95035 PHONE: (408) 942-8200 FAX: (408) 262-2342 CONTACT: SHENNANDOAH BRIDGES EMAIL: SBRIDGES@DEVCON-CONST.COM TENANT BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA PROJECT DIRECTORY 160 PINE ST #350 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 CONTACT: RAMON KHOURI EMAIL: RAMON.A.KHOURI@IMEGCORP.COM STRUCTURAL IMEG CORP. PIER 9, THE EMBARCADERO, SUITE 115 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 CONTACT: GARY LAYMON EMAIL: GLAYMON@TGP-INC.COM LANDSCAPE THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP, INC. 3350 SCOTT BOULEVARD, BUILDING 22, SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 CONTACT: MARK KNUDSEN EMAIL: MKNUDSEN@KIERWRIGHT.COM CIVIL KIER & WRIGHT SYMBOLS NEW BUILDING 1 NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 AREA PER STORY: 1st FLOOR: 9,969 SF 2nd FLOOR: 9,691 SF TOTAL: 19,660 SF TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B OCCUPANCY: E FIRE SPRINKLERED: YES ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 40 FEET / 2 STORIES PER CBC TABLE 504.3 & 504.4 PROPOSED HEIGHT: 30 FEET PROPOSED NO. OF STORIES: 2 BUILDING INFORMATION SITE INFORMATION ASSESSORS PARCEL NO: 093-331-110 (2.752 AC) 093-331-150 (0.246 AC) LOT AREA: 130,592.88 SF (2.998 AC) AREA OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 22,627 SF LOT COVERAGE: 17 % AREA OF BUILDING FLOORS: 38,720 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.30 ZONING INFORMATION ZONING DISTRICT: CIVIC DISTRICT ZONING CODE: PR ZONING DESCRIPTION: PARKS AND RECREATION MIN. LOT AREA: 43,560 SF MAX. LOT COVERAGE: 25% MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 30 FT + 10 FT ELEVATOR AND STAIR TOWERS (PER SSFMC Table 20.300.007) MIN. FRONT SETBACK: 20 FT MIN. SIDE SETBACK: 10 FT MIN. REAR SETBACK: 10 FT PER SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE (SSFMC) TITLE 20 EXISTING BUILDING 2 NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 AREA PER STORY: 1st FLOOR: 7,726 SF 2nd FLOOR: 1,656 SF TOTAL: 9,382 SF TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B OCCUPANCY: E FIRE SPRINKLERED: YES ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 40 FEET / 2 STORIES PER CBC TABLE 504.3 & 504.4 EXISTING HEIGHT: 25 FEET EXISTING NO. OF STORIES: 2 NEW BUILDING 3 NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 AREA PER STORY: 1st FLOOR: 4,932 SF 2nd FLOOR: 4,746 SF TOTAL: 9,678 SF TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B OCCUPANCY: E FIRE SPRINKLERED: YES ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 40 FEET / 2 STORIES PER CBC TABLE 504.3 & 504.4 PROPOSED HEIGHT: 30 FEET PROPOSED NO. OF STORIES: 2 FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENTS NEW BUILDING 1 PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME: 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS (EXTERIOR): 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS (INTERIOR): 0 HOUR NON-BEARING WALLS & PARTITIONS (EXTERIOR): 0 HOUR (U.O.N.) NON-BEARING WALLS & PARTITIONS (INTERIOR): 0 HOUR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOUR PER CBC TABLE 601 NEW BUILDING 3 PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME: 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS (EXTERIOR): 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS (INTERIOR): 0 HOUR NON-BEARING WALLS & PARTITIONS (EXTERIOR): 0 HOUR (U.O.N.) NON-BEARING WALLS & PARTITIONS (INTERIOR): 0 HOUR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOUR ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATIONS INSULATION REQUIREMENTS: FLOORS: R-30 WALLS: R-19 ROOF: R-30 Aa = At + (NS x If) (EQUATION 5-1) Aa = ALLOWABLE AREA (SQ. FT.) OF EACH STORY At = TABULAR ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR PER TABLE 506.2 NS = TABULAR ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR FOR NON-SPRINKLERED BUILDING PER TABLE 506.2 If = AREA FACTOR INCREASE DUE TO FRONTAGE (PERCENT) PER CBC 506.3 AND TABLE 506.3.3 PER CBC SECTION 506 NEW BUILDING 1 Aa = 28,500 + (9,500 x 0.25) Aa = 30,875 AREA FACTOR INCREASE (If) CALCULATIONS PER TABLE 506.3.3: PERIMETER = 436 FT % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 0 FT TO LESS THAN 20 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 34 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 20 FT TO LESS THAN 25 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 0 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 25 FT TO LESS THAN 30 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 0 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 30 FT OR GREATER TO OPEN SPACE = 34 % (If = 0.25) NEW BUILDING 3 Aa = 28,500 + (9,500 x 0.25) Aa = 30,875 AREA FACTOR INCREASE (If) CALCULATIONS PER TABLE 506.3.3: PERIMETER = 296 FT % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 0 FT TO LESS THAN 20 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 32 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 20 FT TO LESS THAN 25 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 0 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 25 FT TO LESS THAN 30 FT TO OPEN SPACE = 0 % (If = 0) % OF PERIMETER THAT IS 30 FT OR GREATER TO OPEN SPACE = 32 % (If = 0.25) NEW BUILDING 1 FLOORS: R-30 WALLS: R-19 ROOF: R-30 NEW BUILDING 3 201 W ORANGE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 CONTACT: DEKE HUNTER EMAIL: DEKE@HUNTERPROPERTIES.COM PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Boys and Girls Club has hired an environmental planning specialist for CEQA consulting services. At the time of this Planning application, the consultant is recommending a Categorical Exemption from further CEQA review, specifically as a Class 32 Infill Development Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332). This CEQA exemption applies to in-fill development projects that are consistent with the General Plan and with applicable zoning regulations. This project is intended to meet this criterion. CEQA APPROACH 00 - GENERAL A0.00 COVER SHEET A1.00 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS A1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN A1.02 EXISTING SITE LIGHTING A1.03 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS A1.10 SITE PLAN A1.20 SITE SETBACK PLAN A1.30 SITE PARKING PLAN A1.40 SITE CIRCULATION PLAN A1.50 SITE TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION PLAN 01 - CIVIL C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY CIVIL SITE PLAN C3.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN C4.1 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN 02 - LANDSCAPE L1.0 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 03 - ARCHITECTURAL A2.21 BUILDING 1 1ST FLOOR PLAN A2.22 BUILDING 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.23 BUILDING 1 ROOF PLAN A2.24 BUILDING 3 1ST FLOOR PLAN A2.25 BUILDING 3 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.26 BUILDING 3 ROOF PLAN A3.00 EXISTING BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS A3.00A EXISTING BUILDING 1 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS A3.00B BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS A3.00C BUILDING 1 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS A3.01 BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATION RENDERS A3.03 EXISTING BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATIONS A3.03A EXISTING BUILDING 3 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS A3.03B BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION A3.03C BUILDING 3 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS A3.04 BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION RENDER A3.07 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS A3.09 EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL BOARD A3.40 SIGHTLINE STUDIES A3.41 SIGHTLINE STUDIES 6/12/2025 PLANNING 295 AREA OF DEVELOPMENT A B C D E F G H LK J M 1 2 3 4 WEST ORANGE AVENUE MEMORIAL DRIVE CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL C STREET DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:16:42 PM A1.00 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS PLANNING 2/21/2025 B C D A N 1 2EXISTING SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA PHOTOS EFG H 3 J 4 K L M 296 P B BART ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BART TUNNEL BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE EXISTING BUILDING 1 (ONE-STORY) TO BE DEMOLISHEDEXISTING BUILDING 2 (TWO-STORY) EXISTING BUILDING 3 (ONE-STORY) TO BE DEMOLISHED 22 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) 10 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 10 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 1 E X I S T I N G PA R K I N G SP A C E 31 EXISTING PARKING SPACES 18 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) 16 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 4 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS) MA T C H L I N E 1A / A 1 . 0 1 MA T C H L I N E S 43°47'12" W 89.99' R=3689.57' D=8°07'49" L=523.56' R=3779.56' D=8°01'46" L=529.67' N 35°19'05" E 25.00' R=3754.56' D=0°06'42" L=7.32' S 54°47'38" E 177.63' S 54°47'38" E 1320.96' CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MEMORIAL DRIVE EXISTING FRONT SETBACK ± 14'-6" ± 34'-5" EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 169'-10" EXISTING REAR SETBACK EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 16'-0" WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E SCOPE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, SEE SHEET A1.10 NOTE: EXISTING PARKING STALLS OUTSIDE OF THIS ZONE SHALL BE RE-STRIPED PER PLAN MIN. FRONT SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 20'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. REAR SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10 '-0" MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E 22 EXISTING PARKING SPACES (WITH 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL) N 35°19'05" E 25.00' R=3754.56' D=0°06'42" L=7.32' S 54°47'38" E 177.63' S 54°47'38" E 1320.96' MIN. REAR SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:16:44 PM A1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"1B EXISTING SITE PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"1A EXISTING SITE PLAN - WEST PORTION EXISTING PARKING ANALYSIS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING STALLS: 108 STANDARD STALLS (8'-6" X 18'-0"), INCLUDING 7 ACCESSIBLE STALLS MINIMUM ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PER 2022 CBC TABLE 11B-208.2 (INCLUDES 1 VAN STALL FOR EVERY 6 PER SECTION 11B-208.2.4) N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 297 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:17:02 PM A1.02 EXISTING SITE LIGHTING PLANNING 2/21/2025 298 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:17:21 PM A1.03 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS PLANNING 2/21/2025 299 P B **** ** SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS FOR INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HERE REGARDING DESIGN, LAYOUTS, UTILITIES, DIMENSIONS 2. EXTERIOR PATHS SHALL: A. NOT EXCEED 5% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL B. CROSS SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% C. PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT CONTAIN VERTICAL TRANSITION EXCEEDING 1/2" HIGH. D. VERTICAL TRANSITIONS BETWEEN 1/4" AND 1/2" HIGH SHALL BE BEVELED AT 1:2 E. CLEAR WIDTH FOR SITE PATHS SHALL BE 4'-0" MIN (EXCLUDING CURB DIMENSIONS) F. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE SLIP-RESISTANT 3. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL CONTAIN LANDINGS MEASURING 5'-0" MIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. MINIMUM WIDTH OF LANDINGS SHALL BE THE DOOR WITH AND EXTEND 2'-0" BEYOND THE LATCH SIDE OF THE JAMB. LEVEL LANDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE AWAY FROM AND CROSS- SLOPE TO DOOR. 4. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION. 5. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS LANES SHOWN SHALL BE MADE TO SUPPORT THE LOAD OF 75,000#. SCD FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. E D C B 3 2 (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE (E) METAL AND BRICK COLUMN FENCE CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL ± 60'-0" BART ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BART TUNNEL ± 60'-0" BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE BUILDING 1 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 36'-0" 28'-0" 24'-0" 22 ' - 0 " A.5F A 4 1 10" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 152'-0" 66 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 4 FROM CONTROL TO GRID F HJK G 8 7 6 5 ~19,723 SF TWO-STORY (~9,992 SF L1 + ~9,731 SF L2) 30 FT MAX. HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 1 ~9,382 SF TWO-STORY (~7,726 SF L1 + ~1,656 SF L2) 25 FT EXISTING HEIGHT NEW BUILDING 3 ~9,767 SF TWO-STORY (~4,960 SF L1 + ~4,807 SF L2) 30 FT MAX. HEIGHT EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM MA T C H L I N E 2A / A 1 . 1 0 TRANSFORMER LOCATION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS EXISTING FLAG POLE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACERE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING MANHOLE, TO REMAIN NEW PARKING STALLS AND ASPHALT PAVING 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 96'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0"BUILDING 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSION ORIGIN AT CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING 2 10" FROM CONTROL TO GRID G 11 ' - 2 " FR O M CO N T R O L TO G R I D 8 PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENT NEW OUTDOOR SPACE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE SHEETS A1.50 AND A3.07) NEW HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS MA T C H L I N E NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL FUTURE DIGITAL DISPLAY BOARD, NOT A PART OF THIS APPLICATION NEW 7'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK ENCLOSURE AND SWING GATE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 8. 3 3 3 % 8. 33 3 %8. 33 3 % WASH AREA MEMORIAL DRIVE NEW BOLLARDS, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS D.5 WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 18'-0" 18'-0" PROPOSED AREA FOR MECH/ELEC EQUIPMENT AND GAS METERS NEW 6'-0" HIGH FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE APRON NEW STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS OUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED OUTLINE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED PARKING STALLS, TYP. SEE SHEET A1.30 NEW LANDSCAPE ISLAND, TYPICAL SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NEW ASPHALT PORTION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND 2B / A 1 . 1 0 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E RE-STRIPE PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN, TYPICAL RE-STRIPE AND CHANGE (E) ACCESSIBLE STALL TO NEW STANDARD STALL AND SHIFT VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL NEW ASPHALT PORTION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC/WJ MN 6/12/2025 11:13:13 AM A1.10 SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 6/13/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"2B SITE PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"2A SITE PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PLANNING 6/12/2025 300 P B **** ** MA T C H L I N E 3A / A 1 . 2 0 MA T C H L I N E ± 120'-7" PROPOSED REAR SETBACK PROPOSED INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 11'-0" NEW BUILDING 3 EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM PROPOSED INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ± 11'-3" 20'-5" PROPOSED FRONT SETBACK WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MEMORIAL DRIVE ± 20'-7" PROPOSED INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUN (46'-0" MAX. PER PER SSFMC SECTION 20.300.007) 150 SF ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF AREA, OR 1.4 % OF MAIN ROOF AREA (10 % MAX. PER SSFMC SECTION 20.300.007) NEW BUILDING 1 TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. (30'-0" MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT FOR PR DISTRICT) BUILDING HEIGHT IS MEASURED TO THE TOP OF PARAPET PER SSFMC SECTION 20.040.005 25'-0"TOP OF EXISTING PARAPET, TYP. 10,625 SF ROOF AREA 5,430 SF ROOF AREA PG&E EASEMENT WASH AREA 30'-0" 34'-0" TOP OF ROOF SCREEN AND TOP OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, TYPICAL SEE SHEET A3.40 FOR SIGHTLINE STUDY TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUN (46'-0" MAX. PER PER SSFMC SECTION 20.300.007) 150 SF ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF AREA, OR 1.4 % OF MAIN ROOF AREA (10 % MAX. PER SSFMC SECTION 20.300.007) TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. (30'-0" MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT FOR PR DISTRICT) BUILDING HEIGHT IS MEASURED TO THE TOP OF PARAPET PER SSFMC SECTION 20.040.005 30'-0" MIN. FRONT SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 20'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. REAR SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 10'-0" MIN. 10 '-0" MIN. 5'-0" PROPOSED 5 FT. MIN. SETBACK VARIANCE 34'-0" TOP OF ROOF SCREEN AND TOP OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, TYPICAL SEE SHEET A3.41 FOR SIGHTLINE STUDY 30'-0" RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND 3B / A 1 . 2 0 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E MIN. REAR SETBACK LINE MIN. 20'-0" MIN. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE MIN. 5'-0" DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC/WJ MN 6/12/2025 11:14:09 AM A1.20 SITE SETBACK PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 6/13/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"3B SITE SETBACK PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"3A SITE SETBACK PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PLANNING 6/12/2025 301 P B **** ** * MA T C H L I N E 4A / A 1 . 3 0 MA T C H L I N E WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MEMORIAL DRIVE 4 SHORT-TERM BIKE RACKS (8 STALLS TOTAL) OUTSIDE & 2 LONG-TERM BIKE RACKS (4 STALLS TOTAL) INSIDE BUILDING 3, SEE SHEET A2.24 2 SHORT-TERM BIKE RACK (4 STALLS TOTAL) OUTSIDE & 1 LONG-TERM BIKE RACK (2 STALLS TOTAL) INSIDE BUILDING 1, SEE SHEET A2.21 2 4 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 24 ' - 0 " 2'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 2'- 0 " NEW BUILDING 3 EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM NEW BUILDING 1 SEE SHEET C2.1 FOR PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS 7'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 6'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 6'- 1 " 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 2'-0" 7'- 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 2'-0" 2'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'- 0 " 6'-0" 5'-0" ± 7'-11" ± 6'-1" 7'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 7'- 0 " ± 6'-0" ± 6'-2" ± 6'-2" 5'-0" 5'-0" BLDG 2 GYM ENTRANCE BLDG 1 MAIN ENTRANCEBLDG 3 MAIN ENTRANCE 5'-0" 8'-0" 6'- 0 " 5'-0" 7'- 0 " 1 3 ' - 0 " 2'-0" 7'-0" 29'-0" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 6'-0"RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND 4B / A 1 . 3 0 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E 24'-0" VEHICLE PARKING STALL LEGEND COMPACT STALL STANDARD PARKING STALL 8'-0" 16 ' - 0 " 8'-6" 18 ' - 0 " STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL VAN ACCSSIBLE STALL EVC - STANDARD FUTURE (F) EV CHARGING STATION EVC - STANDARD EV CHARGING STATION (EVCS) EVC - STANDARD ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING STATION (EVCS) EVC - VAN ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING STATION (EVCS) 9'-0" 18 ' - 0 " 12'-0" 18 ' - 0 " 8'-6" 18 ' - 0 " 8'-6" 18 ' - 0 " 9'-0" 18 ' - 0 " 9'-0" 18 ' - 0 " 2'- 0 " CURB LINE WHERE OCCURS CURB LINE WHERE OCCURS CURB LINE WHERE OCCURS2'- 0 " 2'- 0 " DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC/WJ MN 6/12/2025 11:03:57 AM A1.30 SITE PARKING PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 6/13/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PARKING STALL SCHEDULE A1.30 STALL TYPE PROPOSED COUNT COMPACT 8'-0" x 16'-0" 37 STANDARD 8'-6" x 18'-0" 57 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE 9'-0" x 18'-0" 3 VAN ACCESSIBLE 12'-0" x 18'-0" 1 EVC - STANDARD FUTURE (F) EV CHARGING STATION 8'-6" x 18'-0" 6 EVC - STANDARD EV CHARGING STATION (EVCS) 8'-6" x 18'-0" 1 EVC - VAN ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING STATION (EVCS) 9'-0" x 18'-0" 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS 106 VEHICLE PARKING STALL SCHEDULE VEHICLE PARKING ANALYSIS PROVIDED PARKING STALLS:106 COMPACT STALLS (MAX.): 37 (35% OF PROVIDED) PER SSFMC SECTION 20.330.010 ITEM E.2. ACCESSIBLE (ADA) STALLS (MIN.): 5 PER 2022 CBC TABLE 11B-208.2 (INCLUDES 1 VAN STALL FOR EVERY 6 PER SECTION 11B-208.2.4) EXISTING COUNTSTALL TYPE 0 101 5 2 0 0 0 108 BICYCLE PARKING ANALYSIS PER SECTION 5.106.4.1.1 OF THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (JULY 2024 SUPPLEMENT) PROVIDE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED BICYCLE RACKS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE ENTRANCE, READILY VISIBLE TO PASSERS-BY, FOR 5 PERCENT OF VEHICLE PARKING SPACES (MINIMUM OF ONE TWO-BIKE CAPACITY RACK). PER SECTION 20.330.007 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDE 5 PERCENT OF THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND WITHIN 50 FEET OF A MAIN ENTRANCE. EACH BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET IN WIDTH AND SIX FEET IN LENGTH AND SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT MOVING ANOTHER BICYCLE. TWO FEET OF CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AND ADJACENT WALLS, POLES, LANDSCAPING, STREET FURNITURE, DRIVE AISLES, AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS AND AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM VEHICLE PARKING SPACES. 12 SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (6 MINIMUM REQUIRED) (LOCATIONS NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE AS SHOWN ON SHEET A1.30) PER SECTION 5.106.4.1.2 OF THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (JULY 2024 SUPPLEMENT) PROVIDE SECURE BICYCLE PARKING FOR 5 PERCENT OF THE VEHICULAR PARKING SPACES (MINIMUM OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING FACILITY) PER SECTION 20.330.007 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE EQUIVALENT TO AT LEAST 5 PERCENT OF REQUIRED OR MAXIMUM PERMITTED VEHICULAR SPACES. LOCATED ON THE SAME LOT AS THE USE IT SERVES. AT LEAST 50 PERCENT MUST BE COVERED. COVERED PARKING CAN BE PROVIDED INSIDE BUILDINGS, UNDER ROOF OVERHANGS OR AWNINGS, IN BICYCLE LOCKERS, OR WITHIN OR UNDER OTHER STRUCTURES. IT MUST BE IN AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES: • AN ENCLOSED BICYCLE LOCKER; • A FENCED, COVERED, LOCKED OR GUARDED BICYCLE STORAGE AREA; • OR A RACK OR STAND INSIDE A BUILDING THAT IS WITHIN VIEW OF AN ATTENDANT OR SECURITY GUARD OR VISIBLE FROM EMPLOYEE WORK AREAS. EACH BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET IN WIDTH AND SIX FEET IN LENGTH AND SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT MOVING ANOTHER BICYCLE. TWO FEET OF CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AND ADJACENT WALLS, POLES, LANDSCAPING, STREET FURNITURE, DRIVE AISLES, AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS AND AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM VEHICLE PARKING SPACES. 6 LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (6 MINIMUM REQUIRED) (LOCATIONS INSIDE THE MAIN LOBBY OF THE BUILDINGS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A2.21 AND A2.24) N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"4B SITE PARKING PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"4A SITE PARKING PLAN - WEST PORTION PLANNING 6/12/2025 302 P B **** ** WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL NEW BUILDING 3 EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM MA T C H L I N E 5A / A 1 . 4 0 MA T C H L I N E PEDESTRIAN AND ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL, TYPICAL 8. 3 3 3 % 8. 33 3 %8. 33 3 % MEMORIAL DRIVE BICYCLE CIRCULATION, TYPICAL VEHICLE CIRCULATION, TYPICAL NEW BUILDING 1 BLDG 2 GYM ENTRANCE BLDG 1 MAIN ENTRANCEBLDG 3 MAIN ENTRANCE RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND 5B / A 1 . 4 0 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E SITE CIRCULATION LEGEND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY AND ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL BICYCLE PATHWAY VEHICLE PATHWAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC/WJ MN 6/12/2025 11:02:27 AM A1.40 SITE CIRCULATION PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 6/13/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"5B SITE CIRCULATION PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"5A SITE CIRCULATION PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PLANNING 6/12/2025 303 P B **** ** WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL NEW BUILDING 3 EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM MA T C H L I N E 6A / A 1 . 5 0 MA T C H L I N E 8. 3 3 3 % 8. 33 3 %8. 33 3 % MEMORIAL DRIVE NEW BUILDING 1 ______ A1.50 6C BLDG 2 GYM ENTRANCE BLDG 1 MAIN ENTRANCEBLDG 3 MAIN ENTRANCE 2 4 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 24'-0" 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 29'-0" RED DASHED LINE INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND 6B / A 1 . 5 0 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E SITE TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION LEGEND TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE PATHWAY WASH AREA 20 ' - 8 " 20'-0" 7'- 0 " 3'-4" 5'-0" 4 A3.07 3'-4"4" 12'-8" 4" SOLID, HEAVY-GAUGE METAL SWING GATES WITH TIE BACKS OR CANDY CANE DROP PINS CONCRETE PAD/APRON, 1% MIN AND 2% MAX SLOPE (ACCOMMODATE MAX. GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT OF 60,000 POUNDS) (12'-0" MIN.) 15 ' - 4 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 2 A3.07 3 A3.07 1 A3.07 8" THK. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT (CMU) WALL, TYPICAL 4" MIN. THK. CONCRETE PAD 6" HIGH X 8" THK. CONCRETE BUMPERS, TYPICAL TUBE STEEL COLUMNS PER STRUCTURAL, TYPICAL, SUPPORTING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ON STEEL BEAMS, SEE ELEVATION A3.07 TUBE STEEL FRAME FOR GATES, TYPICAL TRASH AND REFUSE BINS WITH 24" MIN. CLEARANCE ALL AROUND (SHOWN DASHED) LID TO ALWAYS REMAIN CLOSED. PROVIDE LOCK IF BIN IS EQUIPPED WITH LOCK BARS. AREA DRAIN, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 1% MIN 2% MAX SLOPE TO DRAIN 1% MIN 2% MAX SLOPE TO DRAIN AD 1% M I N 2 % M A X SL O P E T O D R A I N 1% M I N 2 % M A X SL O P E T O D R A I N METAL SLIDING GATE WITH TOP TRACK, SEE ELEVATION SHEET A3.07 NOTE: THE ROADWAY IN FRONT OF THE ENCLOSURE TO HAVE A LEVEL SURFACE TO PREVENT THE TRASH CONTAINER FROM ROLLING AWAY WHILE POSITIONING CONTAINER FOR DUMPING. PAINTED "NO PARKING" ON GROUND HOSE BIBB DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC/WJ MN 6/12/2025 11:00:29 AM A1.50 SITE TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 6/13/2025N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1" = 20'-0"6B SITE TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION PLAN - EAST PORTION 1" = 20'-0"6A SITE TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION PLAN - WEST PORTION N 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0"6C ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - TRASH ENCLOSURE N 0 2'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PLANNING 6/12/2025 304 PARCEL PARCEL REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-001 06/06/2025 SV MK PLANNING 6/12/2025 11:35 AM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665 www.kierwright.com 0 Scale 1" = 20' 10 20 40 60 NOR T H NOTES LEGEND TITLE EXCEPTION NOTESABBREVIATIONS C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN MEMORIAL DRIVE C S T R E E T WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 30 5 **** ** REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-001 06/06/2025 SV MK PLANNING 6/12/2025 1:46 PM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665 www.kierwright.com 0 Scale 1" = 20' 10 20 40 60 NOR T H C2.1 SITE PLAN BUILDING 3 BUILDING 1 MEMORIAL DRIVE C S T R E E T WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 30 6 **** ** FF=30.5±FF=30.5± REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-001 06/06/2025 SV MK PLANNING 6/12/2025 1:36 PM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665 www.kierwright.com NOR T H MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T ## # # NOR T H C3.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN MEMORIAL DRIVE WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 30 7 * FF=31.0FF=31.0 MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T ## # # NOR T H REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-001 06/06/2025 SV MK PLANNING 6/12/2025 1:48 PM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665 www.kierwright.com C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN MEMORIAL DRIVE C S T R E E T 30 8 **** ** DMA01 15,181 SF TCM01 DMA02 10,671 SF TCM02 UT-1 3,761 SF UT-2 4,688 SF REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET NO. ISSUE: CHECKED: DRAWN: DATE : JOB NO. CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 A24076-001 06/06/2025 SV MK PLANNING 6/12/2025 11:35 AM © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727-6665 www.kierwright.com 0 Scale 1" = 20' 10 20 40 60 NOR T H C4.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TRIBUTARY AREA LIMITS DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA TREATMENT CONTROL MEASURE RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION FLOW THROUGH PLANTER 1.TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND ARE NOT ON THE EXTERIOR. 2.THE PROJECT IS REPLACING LESS THAN 50% OF THE SITE IMPERVIOUSNESS. THEREFORE, STORMWATER TREATMENT IS ONLY REQUIRED FOR THE DISTURBED IMPERVIOUSNESS. 3.ALL PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN LID STORMWATER TREATMENT SHALL ADHERE TO APPENDIX D OF THE SAN FRANCISCO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES. STORMWATER NOTES STORMWATER LEGEND S E E P L A N FOR INVERT E L E V A T I O N BUBBLER DETAIL 1 INSTALL 12" WIDE APRON OF 3"-4" RIVER ROCK COBBLES AROUND BUBBLER RIM 18" RCP W/ C.I. GRATE SEE PLAN FOR RIM ELEVATION GROUT PIPE IN PLACE MIRAFI 140 N 12" 36" DIAMETER 18" 12" 6" 3/4"-1 1/2" CRUSHED DRAIN ROCK 1.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR BASIN FOOTPRINT AND DESIGN ELEVATIONS. 2.PLACE 3" OF COMPOSTED, NON-FLOATABLE MULCH IN AREAS BETWEEN STORMWATER PLANTINGS AND SIDE-SLOPES.. 3.SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MULCH, PLANT MATERIALS AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS. 4.CURB CUTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 18" WIDE AND SPACED AT MAXIMUM 10' O.C. INTERVALS AND SLOPED TO DIRECT STORMWATER TO DRAIN INTO THE BASIN. CURB CUTS SHALL ALSO NOT BE PLACED INLINE WITH OVERFLOW CATCH BASIN. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR MORE DETAIL ON LOCATIONS OF CURB CUTS. 5.A MINIMUM 0.2' DROP BETWEEN STORMWATER ENTRY POINT (I.E. CURB OPENING, FLUSH CURB, ETC.) AND ADJACENT LANDSCAPE FINISHED GRADE. 6.DO NOT COMPACT NATIVE SOIL/SUBGRADE AT BOTTOM OF BASIN. LOOSEN SOIL TO 12" DEPTH. 18 " MI N . BS M 12 " X* TO STORM DRAIN RISER HEIGHT SEE TCM TABLE REINF. CONCRETE PLANTER * IF TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 4' WALL SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DOWNSPOUT NOTE: IN THE EVENT ONLY ONE DOWNSPOUT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER BOX, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A FLOW SPREADER AT THE DOWNSPOUT TO ENSURE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STORMWATER OVER THE ENTIRE PLANTER. PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN) W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH AND LOCATION. SEE STRUCTURAL 12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE. 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2' BELOW DOWNSPOUTS FOR DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF DOWNSPOUT WALL W/ WATERPROOF MEMBRANE PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPE CLEANOUT W/ CAP AT FINISH GRADE BIO-TREATMENT SOIL MIX (BSM) PER SPECS. FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER (BELOW GRADE)2 FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER NOTES MEMORIAL DRIVE C S T R E E T WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E BUILDING 3 BUILDING 1 STORMWATER LEGEND TRIBUTARY AREA LIMITS FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA TREATMENT CONTROL MEASURE IN-LIEU TREEATMENT AREA RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION DMA TCM 30 9 6' HIGH METAL FENCE 6' HIGH WOOD GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE ARTIFICIAL TURF HORSE TROUGH PLANTER BEDS BIKE RACKS7' HIGH VEHICULAR CHAINLINK ENCLOSURE FENCE SAFETY BOLLARDS 310 311 * UP UP ** * **** * * UP E D C B 3 2 A.5F A 4 1 STAIR 2 MICROPLAZA BLDG 1 MAIN ENTRANCE WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) WA L L G R A P H I C S ( A L T . ) RECEPTION WAITING AREA/ LOUNGE BIKE RACK 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM KITCHEN CULINARY CLASS AV/ ELEC. 21' X 16' 15' X 21' CAFETERIA 35' X 43'DIRECTOR'S OFFICE STUDENT AGRR PUBLIC AGRR STAFF AGRR MULTIPURPOSE ROOM DRINKING FOUNTAIN ELEMENTARY LEADERSHIP MAIN LOBBY 23' X 16' KI T C H E N E T T E 7' X 13' ADULT AGRR BIKE RACK OUTDOOR SPACE 24' X 45' (735 SF MAX OCCUPIABLE AREA) 11' X 14' 10' X 13' 7' X 6.5' 7' X 7' 7' X 7' 7' X 7' GYM LOBBY 11' X 21' 27' x 15' (405 SF) 28 STUDENTS STORAGE 12' X 4' LOADING/ STORAGE AREA 13' X 16' MALE RESTROOM FEMALE RESTROOM BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' JAN./ STO. ELEVATOR 9' X 8' 152'-0" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 28'-0" 24'-0"36'-0" 22 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 66 ' - 0 " EXISTING GYMNASIUM WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) 1'- 8 " WALL HOOKSWALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS SL I D I N G GL A S S WI N D O W 8'- 0 " X 2 ' - 0 " CL E A R S T O R Y WI N D O W (8 ' - 0 " W A L L S I L L ) D.5 FSR CLOSET 3' X 4' (SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 10 to 15 STUDENTS ALT ALT AL T ALT BENCH (ALT.) BE N C H ( A L T . ) WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS ALT ALT WA L L H O O K S WA L L H O O K S OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE PRICE ALTERNATE: LEARNING STEPS SEE OPTION ALT ST O . PRICE ALTERNATE: COLUMN COVER 10'-0" HIGH 1'- 8 " 8' - 0 " X 2 ' - 0 " CL E A R S T O R Y WI N D O W (8 ' - 0 " W A L L S I L L ) 10'-0" HIGH OPERABLE WALL/FOLDING PARTITION BY MODERNFOLD OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH PASS DOOR SEALED CONC. FLOOR HALLWAY HALLWAY HA L L W A Y HA L L W A Y EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING HOLD OPEN HOLD OPEN BLDG 2 GYM ENTRANCE RE C E I V I N G / SIG N - I N A R E A BENCH (ALT.) (P. LAM. MILLWORK) DRINKING FOUNTAIN ALT 3'6"x7'0" DOOR ELEV. CTRL. CLOSET ROLL-UP WINDOW PT D PTD 18'-0" 18'-0" ST O R A G E 12' X 6' 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATION ELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE) 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE) BASE BID: 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) NO SIDELITES ALTERNATE: BASE BID DOOR + 24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOW BASE BID: 5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL ALTERNATE: 5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE) PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTE INCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC) NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER. PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC) 'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUAL PRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'- 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACK CUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN MAIN LOBBY, CAFETERIA, GYM LOBBY, OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE, GAME/REC AREA, GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, BREAK-OUT, THERAPHY, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOM FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STAIRS TREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOOD STRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT HANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEEL GUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAME PRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS THAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOM FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES KITCHEN, CULINARY CLASS, LOADING/STORAGE AREA FLOOR: EPOXY BASE: 6" SELF-COVING EPOXY BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: 10 FT HIGH WASHABLE 2 X 4 CEILING TILES WITH WET SAFE LED LIGHTS ROLL UP DOOR: MANUAL JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATOR FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHES CEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURE LEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS 2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKS COUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKS WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORK PARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH) PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONS ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTOR WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES LEARNING STEPS (OPTION 1 AND 2) FLOOR: RUBBER BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORK COUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVES PLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE) MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILING PROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK E D C 2 1 D.5 WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) ELEVATOR 9' X 8' ALT ALT STAIR 1 PRICE ALTERNATE: COLUMN COVER 10'-0" HIGH 1'- 8 " LEARNING STEPS +16" +32" +48" HANDRAIL AT ONE SIDE BENCH (ALT.) (P. LAM. MILLWORK) RUBBER FLOOR OVER PLYWOOD OVER WOOD FRAMED PLATFORM AND STEPS. RUN RUBBER FLOOR OVER VERTICAL FACE OF PLATFORM AND RISER 3'6"x7'0" DOOR ELEV. CTRL. CLOSET 8'-0" 8 TREADS @ 12" 9 RISERS @ 5 3/8" 5'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 4 ' - 0 " ELEMENTARY LEADERSHIP 11' X 14' GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL. 3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN. 2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2. 3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • MULTI-PURPOSE • TECHNOLOGY • LIBRARY • BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL • GROUP STUDY • STUDENT LOUNGE PROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE • GAME/REC AREA • GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE • CAFETERIA PROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS: • SOUND STUDIO • SOUND BOOTH DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSET MAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSET JANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSET MULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSET ALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSET DIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSET RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:48 PM A2.21 BUILDING 1 1ST FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"3 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PARTIAL 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 LEARNING STEPS OPTION PLANNING UPSTAIR 2 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 27' x 21' (567 SF) 32 STUDENTS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM KITCHENCULINARY CLASS AV/ ELEC.10' X 17' 15' X 21' 7' X 13' LOADING/ STORAGE AREA 13' X 16' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' WALL HOOKSWALL HOOKS 10 to 15 STUDENTS ALT AL T ALT SEALED CONC. FLOOR HALLWAY ALT ** * * EF 28'-0"36'-0" D.5 18'-0" 6/12/2025 312 0 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" E D C B 3 2 A.5F A 4 1 OPEN GAME/REC AREA MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STUDENT AGRR STAFF AGRR GALLERY WALL/ EVENT SPACE MALE RESTROOM MECH SHAFT LACTATION ROOM 7' X 9' 35' X 22' OFFICE 8' X 10'MIDDLE SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ADMIN STAFF AGRR DRINKING FOUNTAIN BOARD ROOM/ STUDY HALL 27' X 21' 27' X 21' (567 SF) 21' X 21' OFFICE 8' X 10' KI T C H E N E T T E 28' X 15'FEMALE RESTROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 26' x 21' (546 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 5' X 7' 5' X 7'7' X 7' 7' X 7' 27' x 21' (567 SF) 27' x 21' (567 SF)27' x 21' (567 SF) STAIR 2 32 STUDENTS32 STUDENTS32 STUDENTS BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' BREAK-OUT 7' X 7' JAN./ STO. 32 STUDENTS OFFICE 8' X 9' 32 STUDENTS FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BENCH (ALT.)FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' ELECT/ ROOF ACCESS 4' X 5' 22 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 66 ' - 0 " EXISTING GYMNASIUM D.5 FSR (FURRING OPTIONAL) WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WA L L H O O K S WA L L H O O K S AL T A L T AL T ALT ALT ALT KI T C H E N E T T E 1'- 8 " 10'-0" HIGH OPERABLE WALL/FOLDING PARTITION BY MODERNFOLD OR APPROVED EQUAL EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING HALLWAY HA L L W A Y EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING 60' X 11' DN PT D PTD MECH SHAFT 3' X 5'ME C H . S H A F T 152'-0" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 28'-0" 24'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" DN ELEVATOR 9' X 8'STAIR 1 ADMIN OFFICE 8' X 10' 19' X 15' THERAPHY 8' X 10' ALT OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE/ GAME/REC AREA 35' X 21' HALLWAY EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING MAIN LOBBY, CAFETERIA, GYM LOBBY, OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE, GAME/REC AREA, GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, BREAK-OUT, THERAPHY, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOM FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STAIRS TREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOOD STRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT HANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEEL GUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAME PRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS THAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, LACTATION ROOM FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES KITCHEN, CULINARY CLASS, LOADING/STORAGE AREA FLOOR: EPOXY BASE: 6" SELF-COVING EPOXY BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: 10 FT HIGH WASHABLE 2 X 4 CEILING TILES WITH WET SAFE LED LIGHTS ROLL UP DOOR: MANUAL JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATOR FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHES CEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURE LEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS 2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKS COUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKS WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORK PARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH) PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONS ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTOR WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES LEARNING STEPS (OPTION 1 AND 2) FLOOR: RUBBER BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORK COUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVES PLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE) MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILING PROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL. 3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN. 2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2. 3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • MULTI-PURPOSE • TECHNOLOGY • LIBRARY • BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL • GROUP STUDY • STUDENT LOUNGE PROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE • GAME/REC AREA • GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE • CAFETERIA PROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS: • SOUND STUDIO • SOUND BOOTH FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATION ELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE) 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE) BASE BID: 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) NO SIDELITES ALTERNATE: BASE BID DOOR + 24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOW BASE BID: 5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL ALTERNATE: 5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE) PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTE INCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC) NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER. PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC) 'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUAL PRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'- 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACK CUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSET MAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSET JANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSET MULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSET ALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSET DIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSET RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:51 PM A2.22 BUILDING 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1 313 ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE MEASURED TO CENTERLINE OF METAL STUD (CL), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR INDICATED. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL ALWAYS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE DIMENSIONS. INFORM THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 3. DIMENSIONS MARKED +/- ARE FLEXIBLE AND CAN CHANGE AS REQUIRED TO FIT. DIMENSIONS NOT SO MARKED SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER +/- DIMENSIONS. 4. PROVIDE THROUGH-MEMBER PENETRATION PROTECTION AT FIRE RATED WALLS, FLOOR-CEILING AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES. 5. SEE ENLARGED PLANS FOR WALL TYPES, TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND FINISHES. 6. LOCATE ROOF VENTS AT MINIMUM DISTANCES FROM MECHANICAL INTAKES & EXHAUSTS AS REQUIRED PER CA TITLE 24. ALSO REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 7. LOCATE ROOF VENTS TO MAXIMIZE DISTANCES FROM MECHANICAL FANS & OTHER NOISE- GENERATING EQUIPMENT SO THAT MAXIMUM INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS PER ACOUSTICAL REPORT ARE NOT EXCEEDED. 8. PLACE WALKWAY PADS PER DETAIL XXXX. 9. PROVIDE CRICKETS AT HIGH SIDE OF ALL PENETRATIONS GREATER THAN 18" IN WIDTH; SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS. 10. MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS PER MFG RECOMMDATIONS, AND MINIMUM 18" CLEARANCE FROM PARAPETS AND ALL PENETRATIONS. E D C B 3 2 1 A3.20 ______ A.5F A 4 1 22 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 66 ' - 0 " 3 A3.20 ______ TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. 27'-10 3/8" 2. 0 8 3 % 27'-10 3/8" TOP OF INSULATION, TYP. 2 A3.20 ______ SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE (COOL ROOF "WHITE" COLOR) OVER PROTECTION BOARD OVER RIGID INSULATION (R-30 MINIMUM) OVER ROOF DECK AND STRUCTURE (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS), TYPICAL 2. 0 8 3 % SL O P E ELEVATOR OVERRUN 4' x 4' ROOF ACCESS HATCH, 16 SF MIN. PER CBC 1011.12.2 2.083%2.083% 27'-4 3/8"27'-4 5/8"27'-1 7/8" 2. 0 8 3 % 2.083%2.083%2.083%2.083%2.083% 25'-0" EXISTING GYM (SEE SITE PLAN) EXISTING GYM TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. 26'-11 1/2" 2. 0 8 3 % 2.0 8 3 % 27'-4 3/8" 26'-11 1/2" 2. 0 8 3 % 2.0 8 3 % 26'-11 1/2" 2. 0 8 3 % 2.0 8 3 % 27'-1 7/8" 26'-11 1/2" 2. 0 8 3 % 2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0" CAFETERIA GREASE EXHAUST (LOW PROFILE) D.5 1 A3.21 ______ 2 A3.21 ______ 3 A3.21 ______ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT RESTROOM EXHAUST (LOW PROFILE) 152'-0" 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 28'-0" 24'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 30'-0" 27'-4 5/8" 27'-4 5/8" 6' - 0 " 1 A3.22 ______ 34'-0" 2 A3.22 ______ MECHANICAL SHAFT (SINGLE PLY MEMBRANE ON ROOF AND WALLS) MECHANICAL DUCTS TOP OF ROOF SCREEN, TYP. ROOF SCREEN, TYP. 2.083% 35'-0" 32'-0" 33'-8" ERV VR F V R F MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 2.0 8 3 % 2.083% 27'-3 3/8" 27'-3 3/8" 27'-4 5/8" 31'-8" 6. 2 5 0 % 6. 2 5 0 % 28'-10 3/8"28'-10 3/8" 30'-6" 34'-3" 34'-3" 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:23:41 PM A2.23 BUILDING 1 ROOF PLAN PLANNING 4/22/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING 1 314 ********* UP UP UP * HJK G 8 7 6 5 MAIN LOBBY STUDENT LOUNGE HALLWAY EXISTING STORAGE EXISTING DANCE STUDIO BUILDING 2 GYM ACCESS EXISTING STAIR 3 HIGH SCHOOL LEADERSHIP RE C E P T I O N WAITING AREA/ LOUNGE31' X 21' (651 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM STAIR 5 14' X 21' DRINKING FOUNTAIN OUTDOOR SPACE STAIR 4 KITCHENETTE THERAPHY 8' X 10' KITCHENETTE WALL MOUNT SINK FOR ARTS CLASS (SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 26' X 15' 40 STUDENTS 31' X 21' (651 SF) 40 STUDENTS 52 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " BENCH (ALT.) BIKE RACK BIKE RACK OFFICE 8' X 10' ELEVATOR 8' X 9' 96'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" EXISTING GYMNASIUM 77' X 11' (735 SF MAX OCCUPIABLE AREA) PRICE ALTERNATE: REPLACE EXISTING DOOR WITH NEW PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (PAINTED FINISH) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) MALE RESTROOM FEMALE RESTROOMJAN 4' X 5' EL E C / A V 3' X 8' STUDENT AGRR STAFF AGRR 7' X 7' 7' X 7' ALT ALT ALTWALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS 1'- 8 " WALL HOOKS WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) WALL GRAPHICS (ALT.) ST O R A G E 3'x7' DOOR EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING HALLWAY HALLWAY EDGE OF 8 FT HIGH GYP. BD. SOFFIT EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH ACOUSTICAL CEILING BLDG 3 MAIN ENTRANCE AREA FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FSR PT D PT D BI K E R A C K S 0 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATION ELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE) 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE) BASE BID: 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) NO SIDELITES ALTERNATE: BASE BID DOOR + 24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOW BASE BID: 5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL ALTERNATE: 5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE) PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTE INCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC) NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER. PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC) 'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUAL PRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'- 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACK CUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL. 3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN. 2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2. 3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • MULTI-PURPOSE • TECHNOLOGY • LIBRARY • BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL • GROUP STUDY • STUDENT LOUNGE PROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE • GAME/REC AREA • GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE • CAFETERIA PROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS: • SOUND STUDIO • SOUND BOOTH LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, THERAPHY, HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY, ACADEMIC SUPPORT FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TECHNOLOGY ROOM FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE MAIN LOBBY, STUDENT LOUNGE, GROUP STUDY FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. STAIRS TREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOOD STRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT HANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEEL GUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAME PRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS THAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATOR FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHES CEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURE LEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORK COUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVES PLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE) MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILING PROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS 2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKS COUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKS WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORK PARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH) PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONS ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTOR WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSET MAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSET JANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSET MULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSET ALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSET DIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSET RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:29:57 PM A2.24 BUILDING 3 1ST FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 3 N 5 '- 0 " **** * G 315 0 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" HJK G 8 7 6 5 EXISTING GYMNASIUM EX I S T I N G ST A F F R R OPEN TO BELOW STAIR 5 25' x 31' (775 SF) EXISTING BACK OF HOUSE EXISTING BACK OF HOUSE HA L L W A Y EXISTING STAIR 3 31' X 29' (899 SF) SOUND STUDIO 10' X 13' (130 SF) SOUND BOOTH 10' X 7' (70 SF) 21' X 23' (483 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM MULTIPURPOSE ROOM HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY/ ACADEMIC SUPPORT 20' X 23' (460 SF) TECHNOLOGY ROOM STORAGE/ ROOF ACCESS ELEVATOR CONTROL 52 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " ELEVATOR 8' X 9' STORAGE 9' X 5' 44 STUDENTS (49 MAX) 32 STUDENTS MECH SHAFT 24 STUDENTS 96'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" STAFF AGRR 7' X 7' STUDENT AGRR 7' X 7' JAN 3' X 5' BENCH (ALT.) 26' X 21' (546 SF) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM GROUP STUDY STUDENT LOUNGE BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' ALT ALT ALT AL T 23' X 21' (483 SF) STAIR 4 FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' WALL HOOKS WALL HOOKS 1'- 8 " DN DN DN DN HALLWAY 3'6"x8'0" DOOR EDGE OF 10 FT HIGH SOFFIT & CEILING BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' FSR 3'-0" X 5'-0" X 36" SILL MECH SHAFT FLOOR PLAN LEGEND DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH BOTTLE FILLING STATION ELKAY EZWS-ERPBM28K OR APPROVED EQUAL INTERIOR WOOD DOOR (SINGLE) 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE) BASE BID: 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) NO SIDELITES ALTERNATE: BASE BID DOOR + 24" SIDELITE (1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) INTERIOR GLASS WINDOW BASE BID: 5'-0" X 5'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL ALTERNATE: 5'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. 1/2" THK. CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES ALT INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (DOUBLE) PAIR OF 3'-0" X 8'-0" U.N.O. PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) WITH FULL VISION LITE (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSETS (SEE DOOR HARDWARE NOTES) KITCHENETTE INCLUDES SINK & SPACE FOR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR (FF&E NIC) NO GARBAGE DISPOSAL AND NO DISHWASHER. PROVIDE COPPER WATERLINE FOR COFFEE MAKER. SEE FINISH NOTES FOR COUNTER AND MILLWORK FINISH. FUTURE FREE STANDING TRASH BIN (FF&E NIC) KITCHENETTE FUTURE FREE STANDING FOCUS ROOM/BOOTH (FF&E NIC) 'ROOM' OR APPROVED EQUAL PRICE ALTERNATE: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR POWER, DATA AND VENTILATION BOOTH 3.7'x3.5' FOCUS RM. 7.7' X 3.9' BIKE RACK 2'- 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" BIKE RACK CUSTOM DESIGN BY DERO OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L1.0 FOR PROPOSED DESIGN GENERAL NOTES FOR PRICING 1. WALL HOOKS: PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING AS REQUIRED WHERE PLYWOOD IS NOT SHOWN IN THE WALLS FOR SHEAR (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 2. RUN ALL THE RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) WITHIN THE 2x6 WOOD STUD CAVITY (BELOW THE 2ND FLOOR BEAMS), TYPICAL. 3. PROVIDE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION IN ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND INTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT THE SOUND ROOM AND SOUND BOOTH WALLS. GENERAL PRICING ALTERNATES 1. VINYL WALL GRAPHICS, SEE PLAN. 2. LEARNING STEPS, SEE PLAN OPTIONS 1 AND 2. 3. BENCHES, SEE PLAN AND INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 4. ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES IN CEILING, SEE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES. 5. FABRIC WRAPPED ACOUSTICAL PANELS, 2" THICK (1.10 NRC) WITH BEVELED EDGES, Z-CLIP MOUNTED PROVIDE 12 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (8) 2' X 8' AND (4) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • MULTI-PURPOSE • TECHNOLOGY • LIBRARY • BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL • GROUP STUDY • STUDENT LOUNGE PROVIDE 16 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (10) 2' X 8' AND (6) 2' X 6' AT THESE ROOMS: • OPEN CONGREGATION SPACE • GAME/REC AREA • GALLERY WALL/EVENT SPACE • CAFETERIA PROVIDE 8 ACOUSTICAL PANELS: (4) 2' X 4' AND (4) 2' X 2' AT THESE ROOMS: • SOUND STUDIO • SOUND BOOTH LEADERSHIP, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, THERAPHY, HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY, ACADEMIC SUPPORT FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TECHNOLOGY ROOM FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE MAIN LOBBY, STUDENT LOUNGE, GROUP STUDY FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. STAIRS TREADS/RISERS: RUBBER ON PLYWOOD STRINGERS: WOOD WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT HANDRAILS: STAINLESS STEEL GUARDRAILS: METAL WIRE MESH PANELS IN STAINLESS STEEL FRAME PRICE ALTERNATE: COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS THAT DO NOT ALLOW FOR CLIMBING HALLWAY FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES JANITOR FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SMOOTH WHITE FRP (8 FT HIGH) WITH SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS FLOOR: SEALED CONCRETE AT LEVEL 1 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE AT LEVEL 2 BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: SATIN SHEEN PAINT CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE ELEVATOR FLOOR: GLUE DOWN LUXURY VINYL TILE (20 MIL WEAR LAYER) BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: STANDARD CAB FINISHES CEILING: STANDARD CAB FINISHES TYPICAL WALL TEXTURE LEVEL 4 WITH SMOOTH WALL TEXTURE TYPICAL COUNTER AND MILLWORK COUNTERTOP: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE TOP & SPLASH MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE BASE CABINET DOORS + BLACK MELAMINE SHELVES PLASTIC LAMINATE UPPER CABINET SHELVES ONLY (NO DOORS) TYPICAL BENCH (PRICE ALTERNATE) MILLWORK: PLASTIC LAMINATE TOP AND SIDES TYPICAL OPEN CEILING PROVIDE WHITE K-13 INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF LEVEL 2 DECK AND ROOF DECK RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHTS ABOVE EACH SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. PRICE ALTERNATES: 1. CONT. LINEAR LED LIGHT ABOVE STALLS 2. 8 FT HIGH X 2 FT DEEP SOFFIT ABOVE VANITY COUNTER & SINKS COUNTER: QUARTZ SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP AND UNDERCOUNTER SINKS WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) PLASTIC LAMINATE APRON/MILLWORK PARTITIONS: PLASTIC LAMINATE PARTITIONS (6 FT HIGH) PRICE ALTERNATE: PHENOLIC PARTITIONS ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES ALL GENDER RESTROOM (AGRR) FLOOR: 2” x 2” DALTILE KEYSTONES GROUP 3 SUEDE GRAY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE BASE: 5” HIGH: 1” COVED MOSAIC & (2) ROWS OF THE FLOOR TILE WALL: SUBWAY TILE, MATTE WHITE FINISH CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS GROUT STANDARD COLOR TO MATCH TILE 6 FT HIGH (10 FT HIGH PRICE ALT.) AT WET WALLS, SATIN SHEEN PAINT ABOVE WET WALL AND ALL OTHER WALLS CEILING: 10 FT HIGH GYPSUM BOARD CEILING, LEVEL 4, FLAT SHEEN PAINT WITH RECESSED LED DOWN LIGHT ABOVE THE SINK AND GENERAL LIGHTING. SINK: WALL MOUNT WITH STANDARD P-TRAP COVER/PROTECTOR WITH FAUCET AND SOAP DISPENSER IN STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH (MATTE BLACK FINISH PRICE ALT.) ACCESSORIES: STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH SEMI-RECESSED (FULLY RECESSED PRICE ALT.) PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER GARBAGE CANS (FF&E NIC) PRICE ALTERNATE: MATTE BLACK FINISH AT ALL ACCESSORIES, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES AND LIGHT SWITCHES DOOR HARDWARE NOTES PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CYLINDRICAL LOCKSET/LATCHSET FOR THESE ROOMS: ENTRY LOCKSET MAIN LOBBY, GYM LOBBY, LOADING/STORAGE, STAIR 2, STUDENT LOUNGE (LEVEL 1) STOREROOM LOCKSET JANITOR, STORAGE, ELEVATOR CONTROL, AV/ELEC, ROOF ACCESS CLASSROOM SECURITY LOCKSET MULTI-PURPOSE, CAFETERIA, CULINARY CLASS, KITCHEN, LEADERSHIP, ADMIN, BOARD ROOM/STUDY HALL, TECHNOLOGY, LIBRARY/ACADEMIC SUPPORT, PRIVACY LOCKSET ALL GENDER RESTROOMS (AGRR), THERAPHY, LACTATION OFFICE LOCKSET DIRECTOR'S OFFICE PASSAGE LATCHSET RESTROOMS (MULTI-STALL), BREAK-OUT, SOUND BOOTH, SOUND STUDIO SOUND BOOTH FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: BASE WALL CONSTRUCTION (2X6 WOOD STUD WITH PLYWOOD WH. OCCURS) WITH 2 LAYERS OF DRYWALL OVER RESILIENT CHANNELS AT SOUND BOOTH SIDE AND MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION CEILING: 10 FT HIGH 2 X 4 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH RECESSED LED LINEAR FIXTURES DOOR: 3'-0" X 8'-0" PRIMED SOLID CORE WOOD FLUSH DOOR (SATIN SHEEN PAINT) IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES (ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE FRAME) WITH SOUND DAMPENING SEALS AT TOP AND JAMBS, AND AUTO DOOR BOTTOM SEAL AND THRESHOLD WINDOW: 3'-0" X 5'-0" 9/16" THK. CLEAR LAMINATED GLASS IN CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES (ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE FRAME) 3'-0" HIGH WALL SILL SOUND STUDIO FLOOR: 24" X 24" VINYL COMPOSITION TILE BASE: 4" COVED RUBBER BASE WALL: BASE WALL CONSTRUCTION (2X6 WOOD STUD WITH PLYWOOD WH. OCCURS) WITH 2 LAYERS OF DRYWALL OVER RESILIENT CHANNELS AT SOUND STUDIO SIDE AND MINERAL WOOL ACOUSTICAL INSULATION CEILING: OPEN CEILING WITH SUSPENDED LED LINEAR FIXTURE PRICE ALTERNATE: ARMSTRONG SOUNDSCAPE BLADES 10" X 94" X 1 3/4" THICK BLADES @ 12" O.C. DOOR: SEE BASE AND ALTERNATE SPECS FOR INTERIOR WOOD/GLASS DOOR (SINGLE) IN THE FLOOR PLAN LEGEND, BUT ADD AN AUTO DOOR BOTTOM SEAL AND THRESHOLD; AND ADD ROCKWOOL IN THE ALUMINUM FRAMES DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:30:00 PM A2.25 BUILDING 3 2ND FLOOR PLAN PLANNING 2/21/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 3 316 ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE MEASURED TO CENTERLINE OF METAL STUD (CL), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR INDICATED. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL ALWAYS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE DIMENSIONS. INFORM THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 3. DIMENSIONS MARKED +/- ARE FLEXIBLE AND CAN CHANGE AS REQUIRED TO FIT. DIMENSIONS NOT SO MARKED SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER +/- DIMENSIONS. 4. PROVIDE THROUGH-MEMBER PENETRATION PROTECTION AT FIRE RATED WALLS, FLOOR-CEILING AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES. 5. SEE ENLARGED PLANS FOR WALL TYPES, TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND FINISHES. 6. LOCATE ROOF VENTS AT MINIMUM DISTANCES FROM MECHANICAL INTAKES & EXHAUSTS AS REQUIRED PER CA TITLE 24. ALSO REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 7. LOCATE ROOF VENTS TO MAXIMIZE DISTANCES FROM MECHANICAL FANS & OTHER NOISE- GENERATING EQUIPMENT SO THAT MAXIMUM INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS PER ACOUSTICAL REPORT ARE NOT EXCEEDED. 8. PLACE WALKWAY PADS PER DETAIL XXXX. 9. PROVIDE CRICKETS AT HIGH SIDE OF ALL PENETRATIONS GREATER THAN 18" IN WIDTH; SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS. 10. MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS PER MFG RECOMMDATIONS, AND MINIMUM 18" CLEARANCE FROM PARAPETS AND ALL PENETRATIONS. 0 4'-0" 8'-0"16'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" HJK G 8 7 6 5 1 A3.30 ______2 A3.30 ______ 1 A3.31 ______ 2 A3.31 ______ TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. TOP OF INSULATION, TYP. SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE (COOL ROOF "WHITE" COLOR) OVER PROTECTION BOARD OVER RIGID INSULATION (R-30 MINIMUM) OVER ROOF DECK AND STRUCTURE (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS), TYPICAL 25'-0" EXISTING GYM (SEE SITE PLAN) EXISTING GYM TOP OF PARAPET, TYP. 96'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 30'-0" 2. 0 8 3 % 2. 0 8 3 % 2. 0 8 3 % 2.083%2.083%2.083%2.083% 2.0 8 3 % ROOF ACCESS HATCH, 16 SF MIN. PER CBC 1011.12.2 2.083% 52 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 1 A3.32 ______ 2.083% LOW PROFILE RESTROOM EXHAUST MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 6'- 0 " 29'-0 1/8" MECHANICAL SHAFT 2. 0 8 3 % 2. 0 8 3 % 28'-0 1/2"28'-0 1/2"28'-0 1/2" 2.0 8 3 % 2.0 8 3 % 28'-5 3/8" 28'-5 3/8" 28'-3 7/8" 28'-3 7/8" 28'-3 7/8"28'-2 7/8" 28'-2 7/8" 28'-11 5/8" 2 A3.32 ______ 2.08% 2. 0 8 3 % MECHANICAL DUCTS36'-0" TOP OF ROOF SCREEN, TYP. ROOF SCREEN, TYP. 35'-0" 33'-0" 35'-7" VR F V R F ERV 34'-0" TOP OF MECH. SHAFT TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUN 9'-0" 2'-0"9'-0" 2'-0"9'-0" 2'-0" DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:37:20 PM A2.26 BUILDING 3 ROOF PLAN PLANNING 4/22/2025 N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING 3 317 25 ' - 0 " EXISTING BUILDING 2 (TO REMAIN) EXISTING BUILDING 1 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) 11 ' - 3 " MA T C H L I N E SE E 1 / A 3 . 0 3 12 ' - 2 " 11 ' - 3 " EXISTING BUILDING 1 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) 12 ' - 2 " DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:30:03 PM A3.00 EXISTING BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BUILDINGS 1 & 2 - NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING BUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION 318 25 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 2 " EXISTING BUILDING 1 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) EXISTING BUILDING 2 (TO REMAIN) MA T C H L I N E SE E 1 / A 3 . 0 4 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:30:04 PM A3.00A EXISTING BUILDING 1 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BUILDINGS 1 & 2 - SOUTH ELEVATION 319 B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" EDCBA.5 FA B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" PL 2 GL 1 GL 1 LF 1 LF 1 PL 2 GL 1 LF 1 GD 1 14 ' - 6 " 1 5 ' - 6 " PROPOSED NEW COLORING SHOWN ON EXISTING BUILDING 2 AS A PRICE ALTERNATE TO PATCH, PRIME & PAINT B2 JOINT 5" SEISMIC LF 2 AT UNDERSIDE OF BROW GL 1PL2 LF 2 (AT UNDERSIDE OF BROW) GL 1 HB 1 PL 2 PT 3 PT 1 PT 2 NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS SHOWN IN GREY LINEWORK D.5 HB 1 BOYS & GIRLS LOGO PAINTED ONTO HARDIE PANELS PL 1 HB 1 PL 3 HB 1 PL 1 PL 3 GD 1 SN 4 3/4" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK 2" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK 3/4" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK SN 2 SN 3 SN 5 (PRICE ALT) (PRICE ALT) (PRICE ALT) (PRICE ALT) WP 1WP1WP1 NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF TYP NOTE: TRILOGY NETWORX PDL1300NW (OR APPROVED EQUAL) KEYPAD TO BE PROVIDED FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY KEYLESS ACCESS AT MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR. ALL DOUBLE DOORS TO HAVE SINGLE HANDLE ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SIDE 35'-0" ROOF SCREEN RS 1 ELEVATOR OVERRUN B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" 3 24 1 B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" HM 1 SN 7 SN 6 PL 1 GL 1 HB 1 15 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 6 " LF 2 (@ UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANG) PL 1 PL 2 HB 1 NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS SHOWN IN GREY LINEWORK PL 2 SN 8 PAINT DOOR TO MATCH PLASTER SN 1 BUILDING 2 BEYOND WP 1 NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF TYPNOTE: ALL EXTERIOR & INTERIOR DOUBLE DOORS TO HAVE SINGLE HANDLE ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SIDE 35'-0" ROOF SCREEN RS 1 ELEVATOR OVERRUN PL 1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, DARK GREY COLOR HB 1 GL 1 LF 1 LINEAR LED LIGHT FIXTURE LF 2 RECESSED LINEAR LED LIGHT FIXTURE IN BLUE OR WHTE LF 3 HARDIE PANEL ARCHITECTURAL PANEL PAINTED DARK BROWN WITH HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM DUAL-GLAZED CLEAR GLASS NAIL FIN OR STOREFRONT SYSTEM AS REQUIRED WITH POWDER COATED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (DURANAR 2-COAT SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK HM 1 HOLLOW-METAL DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT B1 EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND GD 1 CLEAR GLASS DOOR PT 1 BLACK PAINT (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PT 2 WHITE PAINT TO MATCH PLASTER (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PT 3 GREY PAINT TO MATCH PLASTER (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PL 2 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, OFF-WHITE COLOR PL 3 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, ORANGE COLOR SN 1 6" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 2 2'-0" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH SN 3 4" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 4 1'-9" H. X 3'-0" W. RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS & GIRLS BLUE SN 5 1'-4" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) SN 6 1'-2" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH SN 7 5'-2" H. X 8'-6" W. RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS & GIRLS BLUE SN 8 8" RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH WP 1 LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 9'-9" FROM FF TO T.O. FIXTURE WP 2 LOW POWER LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 5'-0" FROM FF TO T.O. FIXTURE RS 1 AEP SPAN CORRUGATED METAL SIDING PANELS IN ZINC GRAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 2:54:53 PM A3.00B BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 320 B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" E D C B A.5F A B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" EXISTING GYM BUILDING PL 1 15 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 6 " JOINT 5" SEISMIC HB 1PL2 GL 1 D.5 PL 2 GL 1 WP 2 NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF HM 1 35'-0" ROOF SCREEN RS 1 B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" 32 41 B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" PL 1 HB 1 15 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 6 " EXISTING BUILDING 2 EXISTING GYMNASIUM BUILDING NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS SHOWN IN GREY LINEWORK BUILDING 1 ELEVATOR OVERRUN PL 1 35'-0" ROOF SCREEN RS 1 PL 1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, DARK GREY COLOR HB 1 GL 1 LF 1 LINEAR LED LIGHT FIXTURE LF 2 RECESSED LINEAR LED LIGHT FIXTURE IN BLUE OR WHTE LF 3 HARDIE PANEL ARCHITECTURAL PANEL PAINTED DARK BROWN WITH HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM DUAL-GLAZED CLEAR GLASS NAIL FIN OR STOREFRONT SYSTEM AS REQUIRED WITH POWDER COATED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (DURANAR 2-COAT SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK HM 1 HOLLOW-METAL DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT B1 EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND GD 1 CLEAR GLASS DOOR PT 1 BLACK PAINT (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PT 2 WHITE PAINT TO MATCH PLASTER (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PT 3 GREY PAINT TO MATCH PLASTER (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) PL 2 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, OFF-WHITE COLOR PL 3 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, ORANGE COLOR SN 1 6" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 2 2'-0" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH SN 3 4" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 4 1'-9" H. X 3'-0" W. RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS & GIRLS BLUE SN 5 1'-4" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH (PRICE ALTERNATE FOR B2) SN 6 1'-2" H. RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH SN 7 5'-2" H. X 8'-6" W. RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS & GIRLS BLUE SN 8 8" RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BRUSHED FINISH WP 1 LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 9'-9" FROM FF TO T.O. FIXTURE WP 2 LOW POWER LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 5'-0" FROM FF TO T.O. FIXTURE RS 1 AEP SPAN CORRUGATED METAL SIDING PANELS IN ZINC GRAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 2:22:38 PM A3.00C BUILDING 1 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 321 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:31:39 PM A3.01 BUILDING 1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATION RENDERS PLANNING 2/21/2025 12" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING 1 - NORTH-EAST FACADE RENDER 12" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING 1 - EAST FACADE RENDER 322 25 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " MA T C H L I N E SE E 1 / A 3 . 0 0 EXISTING BUILDING 2 (TO REMAIN) EXISTING BUILDING 3 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:31:41 PM A3.03 EXISTING BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATIONS PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BUILDINGS 2 & 3 - NORTH ELEVATION 323 18 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " EXISTING BUILDING 3 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) EXISTING BUILDING 2 (TO REMAIN) MA T C H L I N E SE E 1 / A 3 . 0 1 BUILDING 1 BEYOND (TO BE DEMOLISHED) 25 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " BUILDING 2 BEYOND (TO REMAIN) EXISTING BUILDING 3 (TO BE DEMOLISHED) EXISTING B2 TO B3 ROOF ACCESS (TO BE DEMOLISHED) DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:31:42 PM A3.03A EXISTING BUILDING 3 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BUILDINGS 2 & 3 - SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING BUILDING 3 - WEST ELEVATION 324 B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" H J KG GL 1HB3 HB 2 PL 2 GD 1 SN 10 PL 3 B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" 14 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 0 " PL 1 GL 1 PL 2 PL 2 HB 3 SN 9 PROPOSED NEW COLORING SHOWN ON EXISTING BUILDING 2 AS A PRICE ALTERNATE TO PATCH, PRIME & PAINT B2 PT 3 PT 1 PT 2 (PRICE ALT) (PRICE ALT) (PRICE ALT) 12" BATTEN SPACING TYP. 2" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK LF 3 @SOFFIT LF 2 @ VERTICAL WALL LF 2 @ VERTICAL WALL LF 2 @ UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGWP1 WP 1 SEISMIC JOINT NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF NOTE: TRILOGY NETWORX PDL1300NW (OR APPROVED EQUAL) KEYPAD TO BE PROVIDED FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY KEYLESS ACCESS AT MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR. ALL DOUBLE DOORS TO HAVE SINGLE HANDLE ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SIDE ROOF SCREEN 36'-0" RS 1 ROOF SCREEN MATERIAL O/ MECHANICAL SHAFT RS 1 PL 1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, DARK GREY COLOR HB 2 HB 3 GL 1 LF 2 RECESSED LED LIGHT FIXTURE HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL PANEL & HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM - PAINTED BLACK HARDIE PANEL SELECT CEDARMILL & HARDIE BATTEN RUSTIC GRAIN SPACED AT 12" O.C. WITH HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM - PAINTED BLACK DUAL-GLAZED CLEAR GLASS NAIL FIN OR STOREFRONT SYSTEM AS REQUIRED WITH POWDER COATED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (DURANAR 2-COAT SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK B3 EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND GD 1 CLEAR GLASS DOOR PL 2 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, OFF-WHITE COLOR PL 3 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, ORANGE COLOR SN 9 8" TALL RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 10 3' X 5' RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS AND GIRLS BLUE WP 1 LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 9'-9" FROM F.F. TO T.O. FIXTURE WP 2 LOW POWER LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 5'-0" FROM F.F. TO T.O. FIXTURE LF 3 RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT RS 1 AEP SPAN CORRUGATED METAL SIDING PANELS IN ZINC GRAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 2:57:17 PM A3.03B BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 3 325 B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" HJK G PL 3 HB 3 PL 1 PL 2 GD 1 EXISTING GYMNASIUM BUILDING B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" 16 ' - 0 " 1 4 ' - 0 " RS 1GL1 GL 1 ELEVATOR OVERRUN GL 1 HB 3 PL 2 2" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK SEISMIC JOINT WP 2 NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF LF 3 AT SOFFIT ABOVE DOOR ROOF SCREEN 36'-0" RS 1 B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" 8765 GL 1 HB 3 PL 3 B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" 16 ' - 0 " 1 4 ' - 0 " ELEVATOR OVERRUN GL 1 RS 1PL2 NEIGHBORING BUILDING SHOWN IN GREY LINEWORK GD 1 2" PLASTER REVEAL, BLACK LF 2 BUILDING 2 BEYOND WP 1 NOTE: MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS GLASS AREA = 24 SF AT UNDERSIDE OF SOFFIT ROOF SCREEN RS 1 36'-0" RS 1 ROOF SCREEN MATERIAL O/ MECHANICAL SHAFT PL 1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, DARK GREY COLOR HB 2 HB 3 GL 1 LF 2 RECESSED LED LIGHT FIXTURE HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL PANEL & HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM - PAINTED BLACK HARDIE PANEL SELECT CEDARMILL & HARDIE BATTEN RUSTIC GRAIN SPACED AT 12" O.C. WITH HARDIE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM - PAINTED BLACK DUAL-GLAZED CLEAR GLASS NAIL FIN OR STOREFRONT SYSTEM AS REQUIRED WITH POWDER COATED ALUMINUM MULLIONS (DURANAR 2-COAT SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK B3 EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND GD 1 CLEAR GLASS DOOR PL 2 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, OFF-WHITE COLOR PL 3 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER, ORANGE COLOR SN 9 8" TALL RAISED METAL LETTERING IN BLACK SN 10 3' X 5' RAISED METAL SIGNAGE IN BOYS AND GIRLS BLUE WP 1 LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 9'-9" FROM F.F. TO T.O. FIXTURE WP 2 LOW POWER LED WALL PACK MOUNTED AT 5'-0" FROM F.F. TO T.O. FIXTURE LF 3 RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT RS 1 AEP SPAN CORRUGATED METAL SIDING PANELS IN ZINC GRAY DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:14:16 PM A3.03C BUILDING 3 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 3 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 3 326 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:32:23 PM A3.04 BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION RENDER PLANNING 2/21/2025 12" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING 3 - NORTH-WEST FACADE RENDER 327 B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" K B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE FFL 14 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 0 " CMU 2 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION OF BUILDING 3 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) PT 1 SM 1 STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS PT 2 METAL SWING GATES AND STEEL FRAME 7'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " TOP OF ROOF OPEN 12'-8" TRASH ENCLOSURE FFL CMU 2 PT 1 SM 1 STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS TOP OF ROOF 12 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " 7 ' - 0 " OPEN CMU 2 PT 1 SM 1 STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS TOP OF ROOF2.083% 12 ' - 0 " TRASH ENCLOSURE FFL 7' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " OPEN TRASH ENCLOSURE FFL CMU 2 PT 1 SM 1 STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS TOP OF ROOF 5'- 0 " 7'- 0 " PT 2 METAL SLIDING GATE AND TOP TRACK OPEN OPEN 4'-0" 2.083% 12 ' - 0 " SM 1 STANDING METAL SEAM ROOF PANEL, GRAY COLOR TO MATCH PL-1 CMU 2 CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT (CMU) WHITE COLOR TO MATCH PL-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND PT 1 BLACK PAINT PT 2 WHITE PAINT TO MATCH PL-2 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 2/21/2025 4:32:36 PM A3.07 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS PLANNING 2/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE 328 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:18:33 PM A3.09 EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL BOARD PLANNING 4/22/2025 NOTE: SEE ELEVATIONS FOR CORRESPONDING MATERIAL TAGS 329 PB ********* ********* B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" 3 24 1 B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" S I G H T L I N E S I G H T L I N E BUILDING 1 TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUN 30 ' - 0 " 34'-0" TOP OF ROOF SCREEN DASHED LINE INDICATES OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEHIND ROOF SCREEN 35'-0" B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" 32 41 B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL LANDSCAPE PARKING BUILDING 1ORANGE PARK S I G H T L I N E 34'-0" TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUN 30 ' - 0 " TOP OF ROOF SCREEN DASHED LINE INDICATES OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEHIND ROOF SCREEN35'-0" B1 1ST FLOOR 0" B1 2ND FLOOR 14'-6" EDCBA.5 FA B1 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" LANDSCAPESIDEWALKSTREETSIDEWALK S I G H T L I N E SI G H T LI N E BUILDING 1 D.5 30 ' - 0 " TOP OF ROOF SCREEN DASHED LINE INDICATES OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEHIND ROOF SCREEN 35'-0" TOP OF CAFETERIA EXHAUST (LOW PROFILE) TOP OF RESTROOM EXHAUST (LOW PROFILE) 31'-8" 30'-6" 2 A3.40 ______ 3 A3.40 ______ 1 A3.40 ______ 1 A3.41 ______ 2 A3.41 ______ SIGHTLINE STUDY KEY B1B2B3 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:20:21 PM A3.40 SIGHTLINE STUDIES PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SIGHTLINE STUDY FROM NEIGHBORING CHURCH TO BUILDING 1 SOUTH FACADE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SIGHTLINE STUDY FROM CENTENIAL PATH TO BUILDING 1 NORTH FACADE 1/8" = 1'-0"3 SIGHTLINE STUDY FROM ORANGE AVE TO BUILDING 1 EAST FACADE 330 PB ********* ********* B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" H J K B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" 30 ' - 0 " CENTENIAL TRAILLANDSCAPEPARKINGSIDEWALK SIGHTLINE BUILDING 3 TOP OF ROOF SCREEN 36'-0" DASHED LINE INDICATES OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEHIND ROOF SCREEN TOP OF MECHANICAL SHAFT 33'-0" B3 2ND FLOOR 14'-0" 8765 B3 1ST FLOOR 0" B3 T.O. PARAPET 30'-0" NEIGHBORING APARTMENT BUILDING CENTENIAL TRAIL LANDSCAPE PARKING LOT SIDEWALK S I G H T L I N E SIG HTLINE 30 ' - 0 " BUILDING 3 TOP OF ELEVATOR OVERRUNTOP OF MECHANICAL SHAFT TOP OF ROOF SCREEN DASHED LINE INDICATES OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEHIND ROOF SCREEN 34'-0" 36'-0" 33'-0" 2 A3.40 ______ 3 A3.40 ______ 1 A3.40 ______ 1 A3.41 ______ 2 A3.41 ______ SIGHTLINE STUDY KEY B1B2B3 DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO. ISSUE: SHEET NO. NO.DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION 690 Gibraltar Drive Milpitas, California 95035 (408)942-8200 Lic. #399163 24-096 THIS DRAWING EMBODIES IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH ARE PROPRIETARY TO DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC.. AND WHICH WERE DESIGNED, CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NO TRANSFER OF ANY RIGHTS THERETO IS INTENDED OR EFFECTED BY DELIVERY HEREOF, AND EXCEPT UPON THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. THE DRAWING IS NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED IN THE FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF, FOR OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. VARIATIONS THEREOF FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT. DETAILS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND TYPICAL. ALL ATTACHMENTS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO BEST PRACTICE AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. © DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. RESERVED FOR CITY STAMP INCORPORATED 201 W ORANGE AVE. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ORANGE AVENUE CLUBHOUSE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA JHA/MC MN 4/24/2025 3:21:15 PM A3.41 SIGHTLINE STUDIES PLANNING 4/22/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SIGHTLINE STUDY FROM WEST CENTENIAL TRAIL TO BUILDING 3 WEST FACADE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SIGHTLINE STUDY FROM NORTH CENTENIAL TRAIL TO BUILDING 3 NORTH FACADE 331 Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula South San Francisco Clubhouse 201 West Orange Avenue Justiflcation of Variance Findings June 16, 2025 The Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula’s South San Francisco Clubhouse “BGCP” renovation and modernization project requires a variance from otherwise applicable interior side setback requirements under the City zoning ordinance. The variance will facilitate the development of a modernized community center that better serves the public welfare by providing improved vital public services, such as educational programs and recreational activities for local youth. The project will contribute positively to the City by expanding available community space, enabling BGCP to meet growing community needs. The variance will help maximize usable fioor area for the community-focused center and maintain harmony with the surrounding properties and zoning district. The variance request is limited to the interior setback requirement and is necessary due to existing physical constraints on the property, as detailed below. All other applicable setback requirements will be met and exceeded. The following variance flndings will be met, for the reasons set forth below. A. There are special circumstances applicable to the property, including its size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, whereby the strict application of this Ordinance will deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other property of the same classification in the same zoning district. In this context, personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations or pre-existing nonconforming uses or facilities are not hardships justifying a variance; There are unique and special circumstances that apply to the property, including its size, shape, topography, location, and surrounding environment, which make strict application of the zoning ordinance detrimental to the use of the property for a modernized community center. Speciflcally, the existing PG&E easement, BART tunnel zone of infiuence, and the property’s trapezoidal shape (see attached “Site Constraints”) pose unique and special circumstances that signiflcantly limit the developable area of the property. The PG&E easement does not allow proposed utilities to run parallel or crossings and the BART tunnel parcel does not allow new pavement sections to be installed on their land but maintenance of existing pavement and no installation of new utility trenching. Where portions of the proposed development are either within or very close to BART’s zone of infiuence, the BART guidelines will have to be considered during the design and construction of the foundation system for the proposed buildings. The purpose of the BGCP renovation project is to modernize the existing community center, including the reconstruction of the eastern portion of the existing building to create a new two-story K-8 “clubhouse” area. Only a portion of the clubhouse area will be located within the otherwise required setback, which is consistent with existing conditions. Note that personal, flnancial, or family hardships do not apply in this case. Rather, the variance is required because of the existing Site Constraints, and imposition of the otherwise required interior side setback requirement would thwart the project and deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property of the same classiflcation in the same zoning district. 332 Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula South San Francisco Clubhouse 201 West Orange Avenue Justiflcation of Variance Findings June 16, 2025 B. Such unique circumstances were not created by the owner or applicants; The existing Site Constraints were not created by the applicant or the owner. These pre-existing conditions, including the PG&E easement and BART tunnel zone of infiuence, have been in place for years, long before the applicant's lease of the property. C. The variance does not constitute a special privilege granted to the recipient inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated; The requested variance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The developable area of the property is uniquely restricted due to the existing Site Constraints. All other setback requirements will be met and exceeded, ensuring that the project design will not only be consistent with existing conditions, but better align with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. D. The authorization of the variance will substantially meet the intent and purpose of the zoning district in which the subject property is located and will not be materially detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or the public welfare in general; and The purpose of the BGCP renovation project is to modernize the existing community center, including the reconstruction of the eastern portion of the existing building to create a new two-story K-8 “clubhouse” area. Only a portion of the clubhouse area will be located within the otherwise required setback, which is consistent with existing conditions, meaning that the variance will not be detrimental to adjacent properties. The variance will also not be detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity, the neighborhood, or the public welfare in general. To the contrary, the variance will further the purpose and intent of the zoning district by facilitating the development of a modernized community center that better serves the public welfare by providing improved vital public services, such as educational programs and recreational activities for local youth. The project will contribute positively to the City by expanding available community space, enabling BGCP to meet growing community needs. E. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City’s adopted environmental review guidelines. The project is undergoing third-party review in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s adopted environmental review guidelines, ensuring that it adheres to all CEQA requirements. 333 PB E D C B 3 2 A.5F A 4 1 D.5 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL ± 60'-0" BART ZONE OF INFLUENCEPG&E EASEMENT BART TUNNEL 36'-0" 28'-0" 24'-0" 22 ' - 0 " 28'-0"36'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 152'-0" 66 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 0 " NEW BUILDING 1EXISTING BUILDING 2 GYMNASIUM 8.333% WE S T O R A N G E A V E N U E 18'-0" 18'-0" SE T B A C K PR O P O S E D 5 ' - 0 " 10" NEIGHBORING CHURCH BUILDING BGCP ORANGE PARK CLUBHOUSE VARIANCE EXHIBIT LEGEND BART TUNNEL BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE PGE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PGE EASEMENT BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE PROPERTY LINE BART ZONE OF INFLUENCE BART TUNNEL SITE CONSTRAINTS 33 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION – EXHIBIT D DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE An Ordinance Amending Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to make minor revisions to Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to a height exception for an roof- mounted screening equipment. WHEREAS, Hunter Properties, representing the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula (“applicant”), has proposed the redevelopment of the existing Orange Avenue Clubhouse with the demolition and redevelopment of two new buildings to serve a larger population of students, exterior modifications of the existing gymnasium, landscaping and circulation improvements on the property located at 201 West Orange Avenue (APNs 093-331-110 and 093-331-150 of approximately three acres (referred to as “Project Site”) in the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project is located within the Parks and Recreation (PR) Zoning District and Parks and Recreation General Plan Land Use Designation; and WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan policy direction for providing recreational facilities and high-quality childcare services to all San Francisco residents and works; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has proposed minor amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) to make minor revisions to Section 20.110 (Civic Districts) related to allowing a height exception for roof-mounted screening equipment, for buildings 30’ in height or less; and WHEREAS, approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS, the City, in conjunction with an environmental consultant, Lamphier-Gregory, prepared an Infill Checklist and technical analyses to provide substantial evidence that the proposed Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under the provision of CEQA, Class 32, Section 15332 as an Infill Development Project; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2025, the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the proposed Zoning Amendments and associated CEQA determination, take public testimony; following the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. XXXXX making findings and determination under CEQA and Resolution No. XXXX recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance implementing the Zoning Amendments; and WHEREAS, on XXXXXX the City Council for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the CEQA finding and the proposed zoning ordinance amendments, take public testimony, and consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the proposed revisions to the City’s Zoning Ordinance. 335 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council of South San Francisco finds that all Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Amendments The City Council hereby amends the following sections of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to read as set forth below, with additions in red double underline and deletions in strikethrough. Sections, subsections, subdivisions, tables, paragraphs and texts that are not amended by this Ordinance are not included below, and shall remain in full force and effect. 1. Revisions to Chapter 20.110.003 “Development Standards- Civic Districts” Table 20.110.003: Development Standards – Civic Districts Standard PQP S PR OS Key Lot Size Min. Lot Area None (A) None (A) 43,560 sf 43,560 sf Max. Lot Coverage ― ― 25% 25% ① Building Height Max. Main Building (ft/stories)1 30 ft; 80 ft between El Camino Real and Mission 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Setbacks Min. Front 10 ft (A) 10 ft (A) 20 ft (A) 20 ft (A) ② Min. Interior Side 5 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district 5 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district 10 ft 10 ft ③ Min. Street Side 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft ④ Min. Rear 5 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district (A) 5 ft; 10 ft when abutting residential district (A) 0 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district (A) 0 ft; 10 ft when abutting a residential district (A) ⑤ Min. from Shoreline 40 ft from high water mark (B) ― ― ― Landscaping and Open Space Min. Landscaping 10% 10% ― ― ⑥ 1. For buildings 30 feet or less: an additional 5 feet, or 20% of the height of the building, whichever is greater, is permitted for equipment screening, subject to Design Review approval. SECTION 3. Severability 336 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the Ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. Publication and Effective Date Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, the City Attorney shall prepare a summary of this Ordinance. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the Summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s Office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance. 337 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-769 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding a proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD)Zoning District for a period of ten (10)years in exchange for payment of Community Benefits Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.(Billy Gross,Principal Planner) MOTIONS TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: (1)Move to adopt the resolution recommending approval of the Development Agreement and determining that approval of the Development Agreement is in compliance with CEQA. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and take the following action: 1.Adopt a Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD)Zoning District for a period of ten (10)years in exchange for payment of a Community Benefit Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164 and Public Resources Code Sections 15000 et seq) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Project Description The overall 180 El Camino Real site was previously developed as the Safeway Shopping Center,consisting of a 14.5-acre lot with frontages on El Camino Real,South Spruce Avenue and Huntington Avenue.In 2020,the Planning Commission approved entitlements that subdivided the lot into two parcels.The smaller 3.28-acre parcel was approved as a new Safeway store and ancillary commercial uses.That project is now under construction, with an anticipated completion date of Summer 2026. In 2022,a mixed-use,multi-family residential and life sciences project was entitled on the larger 11.24-acre parcel.The project would include approximately 750,000 square feet of Office/R&D uses and 25,000 square feet of other supporting non-residential area,a 183-unit residential building,and a parking structure.The project is designed as a transit-oriented development,and includes pedestrian,bicycle,and a series of publicly- accessible open space amenities.The project architecture and site plan are intended to activate the street levelCity of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™338 File #:25-769 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3. accessible open space amenities.The project architecture and site plan are intended to activate the street level along both El Camino Real and South Spruce Ave. The Office/R&D and multi-family project was considered and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on August 18,2022 and approved by the City Council on September 14,2022.Per South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 20.450.011 (Expiration and Extension),entitlements automatically expire if building permits have not been issued within two years from the date of final approval.This code section also allows a one-year time extension approval with Chief Planner approval,which Steelwave applied for and was granted. Therefore, a total entitlement timeframe of three years is applicable prior to expiration. Development Agreement Request Since entitlement in 2022,the Office/R&D sector has faced serious challenges -higher than typical vacancy rates,contraction in the capital markets,high borrowing costs and a glut of new Class A space in the Bay Area. Simply put,there is contracting demand and investment for new Office/R&D construction.The City has issued one new building permit for a life science project in the past two years (at 580 Dubuque Avenue).Similarly,the Residential sector has also stalled,particularly in relation to project financing.Based on this,the applicant approached the City to discuss a development agreement to extend entitlements on their life science / residential campus to allow the life science and residential markets to steady and recover. The draft Development Agreement (attached to the Resolution as Exhibit A) includes the following key terms: ·Ten (10) year term from effective date ·Payment of all applicable Development Fee rates at time of permit issuance ·Payment of Community Benefit Monetary Contributions, as follows: o First Payment of $480,000 by the 1st anniversary of the effective date o Second Payment of $480,000 by the 3rd anniversary of the effective date o Third Payment of $720,000 by the 5th anniversary of the effective date ·In lieu of paying the Third Payment as of the fifth (5th)anniversary date,Developer may elect to provide written notice to the City of its desire to terminate the Agreement ·All fees paid are non-refundable but can be transferred to a new project owner/developer These terms are in keeping with the recently approved development agreement terms for the 800 Dubuque project.As with that project,the intent is to provide additional time for the applicant and a small but steady stream of payments to the City for community reinvestment.The City Council may choose to use Community Benefit Monetary Contributions broadly for public infrastructure,mobility improvements,local business support, affordable housing, public services and facilities, and even sea level rise mitigation. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The Project site’s General Plan land use designation and Zoning Ordinance designation are both Planned City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™339 File #:25-769 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3. The Project site’s General Plan land use designation and Zoning Ordinance designation are both Planned Development (PD);the project was entitled prior to the adoption of the current General Plan and Zoning Ordinance,but was designed to provide a transit-oriented mixed-use development that will revitalize an underutilized and vacant property,provide active street frontages and open space amenities,focus on pedestrian and bicycle linkages,and establish a high-quality design precedent,all of which are consistent with the goals of the previous and existing General Plan and Zoning District.The draft Development Agreement does not propose any changes to the previously entitled project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report for the South El Camino Real General Plan Amendment and associated Zoning Ordinance amendments was prepared by the City with assistance from Lamphier-Gregory,Inc.for the 180 ECR Life Sciences and Residential Project and was approved by the City Council on September 14,2022.The Addendum determined that the project is consistent with previously adopted environmental documents and that no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164. Extension of the entitlements will not result in any changes to the project currently -if,during the Development Agreement,the applicant proposes changes to the configuration of buildings,site planning,or operational features,a new environmental analysis may be warranted.But under the current circumstances,no further environmental study is required, and the project is consistent with the approved Addendum. CONCLUSION The draft Development Agreement is an opportunity to confirm the City’s commitment to the project entitlements for the 180 ECR Life Sciences and Residential project,recognize the unique economic circumstances facing the life science and residential markets,and ensure a stream of community benefits payments for reinvestment. Based on the above analysis, staff recommend that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1.Adopt a Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD)Zoning District for a period of ten (10)years in exchange for payment of a Community Benefit Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164 and Public Resources Code Sections 15000 et seq) Exhibit to Associated Entitlements Resolution City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™340 File #:25-769 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3. A.Draft Development Agreement City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™341 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:25-770 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3a. Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council approve a proposed Development Agreement to extend approved entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building at 180 El Camino Real in the Planned Development (PD)Zoning District for a period of ten (10)years in exchange for payment of Community Benefit Monetary Contribution obligations in accordance with Title 19 and 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and making findings regarding the consistency of the proposed action with the adopted Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. WHEREAS,the applicant received entitlements approval (P21-0126)by the City Council on September 14, 2022 to subdivide the property to create a total of three parcels,construct one new residential building containing 183 residential units,three Office/R&D buildings totaling approximately 750,000 square feet, ancillary uses and associated parking at 180 El Camino Real (APN 014-183-110),(collectively referred to as “Project”); and WHEREAS,approval of the applicant’s proposal was considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS,the City filed a Notice of Determination on September 16,2022 determining that the 2022 Addendum to the 2009 Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No.2009062070)(“2022 Addendum”)was the appropriate document and that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS,the applicant now seeks approval of a Development Agreement (DA25-0001)for the Project to extend entitlement approval for a period of ten (10) years; and WHEREAS,in exchange for the term extension,the applicant will make up to three (3)payments of their Community Benefit Monetary Contribution obligations; and WHEREAS,on August 21,2025 the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the Development Agreement,take public testimony, and recommend approval of the Project; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed and determined that the previously adopted 2022 Addendum remains accurate and that the time extension will not cause a new environmental impact not already evaluated/mitigated and therefore recommends that the 2022 Addendum is still the appropriate and accurate document that reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City in relation to the Project’s City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™342 File #:25-770 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3a. document that reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City in relation to the Project’s environmental impacts,and finds that the 2022 Addendum satisfies the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and no further environmental review is necessary. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it,which includes without limitation,the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code §21000,et seq. (“CEQA”)and the CEQA Guidelines,14 California Code of Regulations §15000,et seq.;the 2009 South San Francisco General Plan (“2009 General Plan”);the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR; the South San Francisco Municipal Code;the Project applications;the draft Development Agreement;the 2009 South El Camino General Plan Amendment EIR and Statement of Overriding Considerations;the 2022 Addendum to the 2009 EIR;all site plans,and all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed August 18,2022 meeting;all site plans,and all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the City Council’s duly noticed September 14,2022 meeting;all site plans,and all reports,minutes,and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed August 21,2025 meeting and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e)and §21082.2),the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS General 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2.The Exhibits attached to this Resolution,including the draft Development Agreement (Exhibit A),are each incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution, as if set forth fully herein. 3.The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco,315 Maple Avenue,South San Francisco,CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner. Development Agreement (DA25-0001) 1.The draft Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives,policies,general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and the 2009 General Plan,and any applicable specific plan as it conforms to all governing land use requirements and would only extend the duration of project entitlements to ten (10) years; 2.The draft Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in,and the regulations prescribed for the land use district in which the real property is located and would only extend the duration of project entitlements for ten (10) years; 3.The draft Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience,general welfare and good City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™343 File #:25-770 Agenda Date:8/21/2025 Version:1 Item #:3a. 3.The draft Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience,general welfare and good land use practice given the extended term for the entitlements proposed in the draft Development Agreement and will allow the City to absorb new development over a longer period with fewer temporary impacts related to new construction; 4.The draft Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health,safety and general welfare given the extended term for the entitlements proposed in the draft Development Agreement and will allow the City to absorb new development over a longer period with fewer temporary impacts related to new construction; 5.The draft Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values and instead will contribute to a paced development and orderly transition from industrial use to an Office/R&D campus. SECTION 2 DETERMINATION NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby recommends that the City Council make the findings contained in this Resolution,approve the Development Agreement (DA25-0001)to extend entitlements for 180 El Camino Real (P21-0126),and make a determination that the time extension will not cause a new environmental impact not already evaluated/mitigated and therefore recommends that the 2022 Addendum is still the appropriate and accurate document and no further environmental review is necessary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™344 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 ______________________________________________________________________________ (Space Above This Line Reserved For Recorder’s Use) This instrument is exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code section 27383. Documentary Transfer Tax is $0.00 (exempt per Revenue & Taxation Code section 11922, Transfer to Municipality). DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND 180 EL CAMINO REAL OWNER, LLC (180 El Camino Real Project) SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. ______________ OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL Effective Date: __________________, 2025 345 i Table of Contents Page ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................3 ARTICLE 2 EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM ..............................................................................5 2.1 Effective Date ..........................................................................................................6 2.2 Term .........................................................................................................................6 ARTICLE 3 OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPER ...........................................................................6 3.1 Obligations of Developer Generally ........................................................................6 3.2 City Processing Fees and Development Fees ..........................................................6 3.3 Community Benefits Monetary Contribution Pre-Payment ....................................7 3.4 Other Developer Commitments ...............................................................................8 ARTICLE 4 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY .........................................................................................9 4.1 Obligations of City Generally ..................................................................................9 4.2 Protection of Vested Rights .....................................................................................9 4.3 Availability of Public Services ................................................................................9 4.4 Developer’s Right to Rebuild ..................................................................................9 4.5 Project Coordination and Expedited Processing ......................................................9 4.6 Estoppel Certificates ..............................................................................................10 ARTICLE 5 COOPERATION – IMPLEMENTATION ...............................................................10 5.1 Processing Application for Subsequent Approvals................................................10 5.2 Timely Submittals By Developer...........................................................................10 5.3 Timely Processing By City ....................................................................................10 5.4 Other Government Permits ....................................................................................11 5.5 Assessment Districts or Other Funding Mechanisms ............................................11 ARTICLE 6 STANDARDS, LAWS AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PROJECT ...............................................................................................................11 6.1 Vested Right to Develop ........................................................................................11 6.2 Permitted Uses Vested by This Agreement ...........................................................12 6.3 Applicable Law ......................................................................................................12 6.4 Uniform Codes .......................................................................................................12 6.5 No Conflicting Enactments ....................................................................................12 6.6 Initiatives and Referenda; Other City Actions Related to Project .........................13 346 ii 6.7 New Taxes .............................................................................................................14 6.8 Assessments ...........................................................................................................14 6.9 Vote on Future Taxes, Assessments, and Fees ......................................................14 6.10 Environmental Review and Mitigation ..................................................................14 6.11 Future Legislative Actions .....................................................................................15 6.12 Life of Subdivision Maps, Development Approvals, and Permits ........................16 6.13 State and Federal Law ............................................................................................16 6.14 Timing and Review of Project Construction and Completion ...............................16 ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENT .........................................................................................................17 7.1 Project Amendments ..............................................................................................17 7.2 Amendment of this Agreement ..............................................................................18 ARTICLE 8 ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER ..........................................................................19 8.1 Assignment and Transfer .......................................................................................19 ARTICLE 9 COOPERATION IN THE EVENT OF LEGAL CHALLENGE .............................19 9.1 Cooperation ............................................................................................................20 9.2 Reapproval .............................................................................................................20 ARTICLE 10 DEFAULT; REMEDIES; TERMINATION ..........................................................21 10.1 Defaults ..................................................................................................................21 10.2 Termination ............................................................................................................21 10.3 Enforced Delay; Extension of Time of Performance .............................................21 10.4 Legal Action...........................................................................................................22 10.5 Periodic Review .....................................................................................................22 10.6 California Law .......................................................................................................23 10.7 Resolution of Disputes ...........................................................................................24 10.8 Attorneys’ Fees ......................................................................................................24 10.9 Hold Harmless .......................................................................................................24 ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS ...............................................................................................24 11.1 Incorporation of Recitals and Introductory Paragraph ...........................................24 11.2 No Agency .............................................................................................................24 11.3 Enforceability .........................................................................................................25 11.4 Severability ............................................................................................................25 11.5 Other Necessary Acts and City Approvals ............................................................25 11.6 Construction ...........................................................................................................25 347 iii 11.7 Other Miscellaneous Terms ...................................................................................26 11.8 Covenants Running with the Land .........................................................................26 11.9 Notices ...................................................................................................................26 11.10 Mortgagee Protection .............................................................................................27 11.11 Entire Agreement, Counterparts And Exhibits ......................................................28 11.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries .................................................................................28 11.13 Recordation Of Development Agreement .............................................................28 Exhibit A – Description and Diagram of Project Site Exhibit B – List of Project Approvals Exhibit C – City Fees, Exactions, and Payments Exhibit D – Sustainability Features Exhibit E – Applicable Laws Exhibit F – Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement 348 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into as of ________________, 2025 (“Effective Date”) by and between 180 US El Camino Real Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation (“City”), pursuant to California Government Code (“Government Code”) sections 65864 et seq. Developer and City are sometimes referred to herein as individually a “Party” and collectively, “Parties.” RECITALS (a) To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California enacted California Government Code sections 65864 et seq., which authorizes City to enter into an agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property. (b) Pursuant to Government Code section 65865, City has adopted procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements (South San Francisco Municipal Code (“SSFMC”) Chapter 19.60). This Agreement has been processed, considered, and executed in accordance with such procedures and requirements. (c) The Developer owns fee title to and proposes to redevelop the approximately 11.214-acre real property depicted and legally described on Exhibit A (“Project Site”) with the 180 El Camino Real Project, which would include the subdivision of the Project Site to create a total of three parcels, construction of one new residential building containing up to 183 residential units, three new office/research and development (“R&D”) buildings totaling up to approximately 750,000 gross square feet (“gsf”), ancillary uses, associated parking and related infrastructure and landscaping all as further defined in the Project Approvals (defined in Recital K, below) (the “Project”). (d) The terms and conditions of this Agreement have undergone extensive review by Developer and City and have been found to be fair, just, and reasonable. (e) The City believes that the best interests of the citizens of the City of South San Francisco and the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement. (f) This Agreement and the Project will be consistent with the General Plan (the “General Plan”) and the South San Francisco Municipal Code (“SSFMC”) applicable and in effect at the time the Project (defined below) achieved application completeness. (g) Development (as defined in Article 1 of this Agreement) of the Project Site with the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement will provide substantial benefits to and will further important policies and goals of City. This Agreement will, among other things, benefit the City by (1) advancing the City’s economic development goals of enhancing the competitiveness of the local economy and maintaining a strong and diverse revenue and job base, (2) creating a state-of-the art commercial campus development to advance General Plan objectives for the area, (3) supporting the City’s achievement of goals related to its climate action plan 349 2 through incorporation of environmentally sensitive design and equipment, energy conservation features, water conservation measures, and other sustainability features, (5) generating construction-related benefits, including employment, economic and fiscal benefits related to new construction, (6) providing substantial community benefits, and (7) generating fiscal benefits and substantial infrastructure improvements to the City and San Mateo County due to community benefits, taxes and other revenue sources from operations. (h) In exchange for the benefits to City described in the preceding Recital, together with the other public benefits that will result from the Development of the Project, Developer will receive by this Agreement assurance that it may proceed with the Project in accordance with Applicable Law (as defined in Article 1 of this Agreement), and therefore desires to enter into this Agreement. (i) This Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning and budgeting and provide for the orderly Development of the Project to allow construction over time in response to market cycles, facilitate progressive installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to the Development of the Project on the Project Site, and generally serve the purposes for which development agreements under section 65864, et seq. of the California Government Code are intended. (j) On September 14, 2022, after a duly noticed public hearings before the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) and the City of South San Francisco City Council (“City Council”), by Resolution No. 22-721 , the City Council approved an Addendum for the Project to the 2009 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) finding that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 2100 et seq. (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §§ 15000 et seq.) section 15164, the Project is consistent with the development density established by the 2009 General Plan for which the 2009 General Plan EIR was certified and thus, the Project does not require additional environmental review, except the analysis contained in the Project’s environmental document, which examined all potential project-specific environmental effects which are peculiar to the Project and the Project Site and adopted a Mitigation, Reporting and Monitoring Plan for the Project (“MMRP”). (k) On September 14, 2022, after a duly noticed public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council, the City Council also duly adopted the following resolutions 22-722 and 22-723 granting certain land use entitlements for Development of the Project, subject to applicable conditions of approval: • Conditional Use Permit (UP21-0013), • Design Review (DR21-0045), • Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM21-0012) (“TDM Plan”), • Tentative Parcel Map (PM21-0003), and 350 3 • Overrule of San Mateo County Association of Governments (C/CAG) Airport Land Use Commission determination of inconsistency with respect to Noise Policies for the proposed residential portion of the Project. The entitlements described in this Recital K, and listed on Exhibit B, are collectively referred to herein as the “Project Approvals.” (l) The Project has been designed to fulfill the Development vision of the Project Approvals consistent with the City’s land use policies and regulations in effect as of the date of the Project Approvals, and to secure Developer’s ability to achieve the Development potential of the Project Site at an appropriate level of growth. (m) On _______, 2025 after duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. [XXXX] introducing, approving and authorizing the execution of this Agreement and thereafter in adopting Ordinance No. [_] (the “Enabling Ordinance”) on [DATE], the City Council found that this Agreement is consistent with the 2009 General Plan (“2009 General Plan”) and Title 20 of the SSFMC (“2022 Zoning Code”) in effect as of the Project Complete Application Date (defined below) and has followed all necessary proceedings in accordance with the City’s rules and regulations for the approval of this Agreement. The Enabling Ordinance was effective thirty (30) days later on [DATE]. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, pursuant to the authority contained in Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5 and Chapter 19.60 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code in effect on the Effective Date and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS “Administrative Agreement Amendment” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 7.2 of this Agreement. “Administrative Project Amendment” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 7.1 of this Agreement. “Affiliate” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 8.1 of this Agreement. “Agreement” shall mean this Development Agreement. “Applicable Law” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 6.3 of this Agreement. “CEQA” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital J of this Agreement. “City” shall mean the City of South San Francisco. “City Council” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital J of this Agreement. 351 4 “City Law” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 6.5 of this Agreement. “Control,” “controlled,” and “controlling” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 8.1 of this Agreement. “Default” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.1 of this Agreement. “Deficiencies” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 9.2 of this Agreement. “Developer” shall have the meaning set forth in the introductory paragraph. “Development” or “Develop” shall mean the division or subdivision of land into one or more parcels; the construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, improvement, maintenance, or enlargement of any structure; any excavation, fill, grading, landfill, or land disturbance; the construction of specified road, path, trail, transportation, water, sewer, electric, communications, and wastewater infrastructure directly related to the Project whether located within or outside the Project Site; the installation of landscaping and other facilities and improvements necessary or appropriate for the Project; and any use or extension of the use of land. “Development Fees” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 3.2 of this Agreement. “Direct Community Benefits” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 3.3 of this Agreement. “Effective Date” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 2.1 to this Agreement. “Enabling Ordinance” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital M of this Agreement. “Force Majeure Delay” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. “GDP” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. “2009 General Plan” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital O of this Agreement. “Government Code” shall have the meaning set forth in the introductory paragraph. “Judgment” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 9.2 of this Agreement. “Legal Challenge” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 9.1 of this Agreement. “Mortgage” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 11.10 of this Agreement. “Mortgagee” shall mean the beneficiary of any Mortgage. “MMRP” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital K of this Agreement. “Notice of Force Majeure Delay” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. 352 5 “Party” and/or “Parties” shall have the meaning set forth in the introductory paragraph. “Periodic Review” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 10.5 of this Agreement. “Planning Commission” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital K of this Agreement. “Project” shall mean the Development on the Project Site as contemplated by the Project Approvals and, as, when, and if they are issued, the Subsequent Approvals, including, without limitation, the permitted uses, density and intensity of uses, and maximum size and height of buildings specified in the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals may be further defined or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. “Project Approvals” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital M of this Agreement. “Project Complete Application Date” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 3.2(b) of this Agreement. “Project Site” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital C of this Agreement. “Severe Economic Recession” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. “SOV” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 3.4 of this Agreement. “SSFMC” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital B of this Agreement. “Subsequent Approvals” shall mean those certain other land use approvals, entitlements, and permits other than the Project Approvals that are necessary or desirable for the Project. In particular, for example and without limitation, the Parties contemplate that Developer may, at its election, seek approvals for the following: amendments of the Project Approvals; improvement agreements; grading permits; demolition permits; building permits; lot line adjustments; sewer, water, and utility connection permits; certificates of occupancy; subdivision map approvals; parcel map approvals; resubdivisions; zoning and rezoning approvals; conditional use permits; minor use permits; sign permits; any subsequent approvals required by other state or federal entities for Development and implementation of the project that are sought or agreed to in writing by Developer; and any amendments to, or repealing of, any of the foregoing. “TDM Plan” shall have that meaning set forth in Recital K of this Agreement. “Term” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 2.2 of this Agreement. To the extent that any defined terms contained in this Agreement are not defined above, then such terms shall have the meaning otherwise ascribed to them elsewhere in this Agreement, or if not in this Agreement, then by controlling law, including the SSFMC. ARTICLE 2 EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM 353 6 2.1 Effective Date. This Agreement is effective as of the date of the Enabling Ordinance defined in Recital M is effective (“Effective Date”) and the Effective Date shall be inserted on the cover page prior to recordation. 2.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and continue (unless this Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended as provided in this Agreement) until ten years plus one (1) day after the Effective Date (“Term”); as such Term may be extended by Force Majeure Delay pursuant to Section 10.3, or mutual, written agreement of the Parties pursuant to Section 7.2(b). ARTICLE 3 OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPER 3.1 Obligations of Developer Generally. The Parties acknowledge and agree that City’s agreement to perform and abide by the covenants and obligations of City set forth in this Agreement is a material consideration for Developer’s agreement to perform and abide by its long-term covenants and obligations, as set forth herein. The Parties acknowledge that many of Developer’s long-term obligations set forth in this Agreement are in addition to Developer’s agreement to perform all the applicable mitigation measures required by CEQA. Failure by Developer to make any of the payments or provide the community benefits called for in this Article 3 at the times and in the amounts specified shall constitute a default by Developer subject to the provisions of Article 10 of this Agreement. 3.2 City Processing Fees and Development Fees. (a) Processing Fees. Developer shall pay those processing, building permit, inspection and plan checking fees and charges required by City for processing applications and requests for Subsequent Approvals under the applicable regulations in effect at the time such applications and requests are submitted to City. (b) Development Fees. Consistent with the terms of the Agreement, City shall have the right to impose only such categories of development fees (“Development Fees”) as had been adopted by City and in effect as of the date the Project’s development application was determined to be complete (i.e. April 1, 2022) (“Project Complete Application Date”), as set forth in Exhibit C. No new development impact fees shall apply to the Project for the Term of this Agreement. The Development Fees shall be paid at the rates in effect at the time of payment. Development Fees shall be paid at the time set forth in Exhibit C except as otherwise provided in Article 3 of this Agreement. This Section 3.2(b) shall not prohibit City from imposing on Developer any fee or obligation that is imposed by a regional agency or the State of California in accordance with state or federal obligations and required to be implemented by City, unless and to the extent such obligation permits the City to not apply such fee or obligation to projects that are subject to vesting pursuant to a development agreement. 354 7 3.3 Community Benefits Monetary Contribution Pre-Payment. In exchange for the City’s commitments, Approvals, and concessions provided for in this Agreement, Developer shall pre- pay its “Community Benefits Monetary Contribution” in the amount of $2,400,000 at the times and in the amounts listed in this Section 3.3. As part of its Project Approvals approved on September 14, 2022 and described in Recital K, the City imposed and Developer agreed to make the aforementioned Community Benefits Monetary Contribution pursuant to Condition of Approval Number 47 of the Resolution No. 22-273, which required payment upon issuance of building permit. The Community Benefits Monetary Contribution payments specified in this Section 3.3 satisfy Developer’s obligations pursuant to SSFMC Section 20.395.003.A.2 requiring that developers enter into Community Benefits Agreements in exchange for FAR increases between 1.0 and 2.5. Pursuant to this Agreement, the City, in its sole discretion, may allocate and spend the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution for any authorized governmental purpose. i. Upon the first (1st) anniversary of the Effective Date, Developer shall make an initial payment of Four Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($480,000) towards the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution applicable to Project, (the “Initial Payment”); ii. Upon the third (3rd) anniversary of the Effective Date, Developer shall make an additional payment of Four Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($480,000) towards the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution applicable to Project (the “Second Payment”); and iii. Upon the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Effective Date, Developer shall make an additional payment of Seven Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars ($720,000) towards the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution applicable to Project (the “Third Payment”). iv. In lieu of paying the Third Payment as of the fifth (5th) anniversary date, Developer may elect to provide written notice to the City of its desire to terminate this Agreement. v. Developer shall pay the remaining portion of the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution (the “Final Payment”) at the time of issuance of the first building permit after the 5th anniversary of the Effective Date as adjusted by the percentage increase in the CPI from the Effective Date. For illustrative purposes, as of the Effective Date, the estimated amount of the Final Payment, before adjusted for the applicable increase in CPI, is Seven Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($720,000). vi. For any Payment made by Developer, Developer shall provide written confirmation of payment to the City which identifies the obligation and the portion of the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution that is being paid. vii. The obligation to satisfy the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution, or the right to receive credit for prior Payments, or any portion thereof, may 355 8 be assigned in connection with any assignment and assumption of rights under Article 8 of this Agreement. viii. If Developer does not provide any Payment when due, City will provide notice to Developer of its failure to pay and afford an opportunity for Developer to cure by submitting payment within ten (10) business days from receipt of such notice. Failure by the City to provide such notice shall not be deemed as a waiver of the requirement to make any Payments. ix. Once paid, no Payment of the Community Benefits Monetary Contribution is refundable in the event Developer does not pursue development of the Project or elects to terminate this Agreement as of the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Effective Date. 3.4 Other Developer Commitments. a. Transportation Demand Management Plan. Developer shall implement the TDM Plan approved by the City as described in Recital K to reduce the Project-related single occupancy vehicle (“SOV”) trips and to encourage the use of public transit and alternate modes of transportation. The TDM Plan is designed to ensure that a minimum of forty percent (40%) of mode shift from single occupancy vehicle trips shall be achieved and maintained, and shall be implemented through one or more individual TDM plans. Developer shall comply with all annual reporting obligations associated with the TDM Plan as outlined in SSFMC § 20.400.006. b. Public Open Space. Developer shall provide publicly accessible open space on the Project Site, substantially in the size and in the locations provided in the Project Approvals, and improved with active and passive recreation amenities, as provided in the Project Approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit Developer from enacting reasonable rules and regulations for the usage of such open space, including regulations related to hours of operation, security, and conduct within such open space. The City and Developer will meet and confer in good faith to review requests to accommodate specific security needs, specialized employee amenities and/or exclusive tenant use areas or times that are requested for the tenant’s commercially reasonable business needs while ensuring appropriate public access. c. Sustainability Commitments. Developer shall implement the sustainability features identified in the Project Approvals. For ease of reference only, a list of these sustainability features is attached as Exhibit E. d. Mitigation Measures. Developer shall comply with the mitigation measures identified and approved in accordance with CEQA or other law as identified and as set forth in the MMRP. 356 9 e. Utility Relocation and Replacement. Developer, at is sole cost, shall be responsible for all on-site work to relocate and upgrade required utilities and infrastructure required by the Project Approvals. As each phase of utilities infrastructure is built, it is anticipated that the constructed public infrastructure will be dedicated to and accepted by the City, as set forth in the Project Approvals. ARTICLE 4 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY 4.1 Obligations of City Generally. The Parties acknowledge and agree that Developer’s agreement to perform and abide by its covenants and obligations set forth in this Agreement, including Developer’s decision to site the Project in the City, is a material consideration for City’s agreement to perform and abide by the long-term covenants and obligations of City, as set forth herein. 4.2 Protection of Vested Rights. City acknowledges that the vested rights provided to Developer by this Agreement might prevent some City Law from applying to the Project Site or prevailing over all or any part of this Agreement. City further acknowledges that Developer’s vested rights to Develop the Project Site include the rights provided by the Project Approvals or the Subsequent Approvals, which may not be diminished by the enactment or adoption of City Law, except as provided in this Agreement. City shall cooperate with Developer and shall consider undertaking actions mutually agreed by the Parties as necessary to ensure that this Agreement remains in full force and effect. 4.3 Availability of Public Services. To the maximum extent permitted by law and consistent with its authority, City shall reasonably assist Developer in reserving such capacity for sewer and water services as may be necessary to serve the Project. 4.4 Developer’s Right to Rebuild. City agrees that, during the Term of this Agreement, Developer shall have the right to renovate or rebuild all or any part of the Project should it become necessary due to damage or destruction, or if any buildings become functionally outdated, within Developer’s sole discretion. Any such renovation or rebuilding shall be subject to the square footage and height limitations vested by this Agreement, and shall comply with the Project Approvals, the building codes existing at the time of such rebuilding or reconstruction, and the requirements of CEQA. 4.5 Project Coordination and Expedited Processing. City shall perform those obligations of City set forth in this Agreement, which the City acknowledges are essential for the Developer to perform its obligations in Article 3. City and Developer shall use good faith and diligent efforts to communicate, cooperate and coordinate with each other during Development of the Project. In addition, the City agrees to provide an expedited 357 10 plan check process for the approval of the Project’s improvement and building plans consistent with its existing practices for expedited plan checks. City will use reasonable efforts to provide such plan checks within three (3) weeks of Developer’s submittal that meets the requirements of Section 5.2. City acknowledges that the City’s timely processing of Subsequent Approvals and plan checks is essential to the successful and complete Development of the Project. 4.6 Estoppel Certificates. Developer may at any time, and from time to time, deliver to City notice requesting that City certify to Developer, a potential transferee pursuant to Article 8, a potential lender to Developer, or a Mortgagee in writing: (i) that this Agreement is in full force and effect and creates binding obligations on the Parties; (ii) that this Agreement has not been amended or modified, or if so amended or modified, identifying such amendments or modifications; (iii) that Developer is not in Default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in Default, identifying the nature, extent and status of any such Default; and (iv) the findings of the City with respect to the most recent Periodic Review performed pursuant to Section 10.5 of this Agreement. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting on behalf of City, shall execute and return such certificate within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the request. ARTICLE 5 COOPERATION – IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 Processing Application for Subsequent Approvals. By approving the Project Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare of the City. Accordingly, in considering any application for a Subsequent Approval, to the maximum extent permitted by law, City shall not use its discretionary authority to revisit, frustrate, or change the policy decisions or material terms reflected by the Project Approvals, or otherwise to prevent or delay Development of the Project. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed to be tools to implement those final policy decisions. 5.2 Timely Submittals By Developer. Developer acknowledges that City cannot process Subsequent Approvals until Developer submits applications and processes them in a complete and timely manner. Developer, as it submits applications for Subsequent Approvals, shall use its best efforts to (i) provide to City in a timely manner any and all documents, applications, plans, and other information necessary for City to carry out its obligations hereunder; and (ii) cause Developer’s planners, engineers, and all other consultants to provide responses to City requests for necessary documents, applications, plans and other necessary required materials as set forth in the Applicable Law in a timely and good faith manner appropriate to the context. 5.3 Timely Processing By City. Upon submission by Developer of all appropriate applications and processing fees for any Subsequent Approval, City shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, promptly and diligently commence and complete all steps necessary to act on the Subsequent Approval application 358 11 including, without limitation: (i) providing at Developer’s expense and subject to Developer’s request and prior approval, reasonable overtime staff assistance and/or staff consultants for planning and processing of each Subsequent Approval application; (ii) if legally required, providing notice and holding public hearings; and (iii) acting on any such Subsequent Approval application. City shall ensure that adequate staff is available, and shall authorize overtime staff assistance as may be necessary, to timely process any such Subsequent Approval application. 5.4 Other Government Permits. At Developer’s sole discretion and in accordance with Developer’s construction schedule, Developer shall apply for such other permits and approvals as may be required by other governmental or quasi-governmental entities in connection with the Development of, or the provision of services to, the Project. City, at Developer’s expense, shall cooperate with Developer in its efforts to obtain such permits and approvals and shall, from time to time, at the request of Developer, use its reasonable efforts to assist Developer to ensure the timely availability of such permits and approvals. 5.5 Assessment Districts or Other Funding Mechanisms. a. Existing Fees. As set forth in Section 3.2, above, the Parties understand and agree that as of the Effective Date the fees, exactions, and payments listed in Exhibit C are the only City fees and exactions that apply to the Project. b. Application of Fees Imposed by Outside Agencies. City agrees to exempt Developer from any and all fees, including but not limited to, development impact fees, which other public agencies request City to impose at City’s discretion on the Project and/or Project Site after the Effective Date through the expiration of the Term. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event that another public agency requests that City impose a fee, including a development impact fee on all new development and land use projects on a citywide (applicable Plan Area-wide) basis, then any such fee duly adopted by City shall apply to the Project, unless such request permits the City to exempt projects that are subject to vesting pursuant to a development agreement. This Section 5.5(b) shall not prohibit City from imposing on Developer any fee or obligation that is imposed by a regional agency in accordance with state or federal obligations implemented by City in cooperation with such regional agency, or that is imposed by the State of California, unless such fee or obligation permits the City to exempt projects that are subject to vesting pursuant to a development agreement. ARTICLE 6 STANDARDS, LAWS AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PROJECT 6.1 Vested Right to Develop. Developer shall have a vested right to Develop the Project on the Project Site in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Subsequent Approvals (as, when, and if they are issued), and Applicable Law, provided, however, that this Agreement 359 12 shall not supersede, diminish, or impinge upon vested rights secured pursuant to other Applicable Laws, including without limitation, vested rights secured in connection with a vesting tentative subdivision map pursuant to the California Subdivision Map Act (Gov’t. Code §§ 66410 et seq.). Nothing in this section shall be deemed to eliminate or diminish the requirement of Developer to obtain any required Subsequent Approvals, or to eliminate or diminish Developer’s right to have its applications for any Subsequent Approval timely processed by City in accordance with this Agreement and Applicable Law. 6.2 Permitted Uses Vested by This Agreement. The vested permitted uses of the Project Site; the vested density and intensity of use of the Project Site; the vested maximum height, bulk, and size of proposed buildings; vested provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and the location of public improvements; the general location of public utilities; and other vested terms and conditions of Development applicable to the Project, shall be as set forth in the vested Project Approvals and, as and when they are issued (but not in limitation of any right to Development as set forth in the Project Approvals) the vested Subsequent Approvals. The vested permitted uses for the Project shall include those uses listed as “permitted” in the Project Approvals, as they may be amended from time to time in accordance with this Agreement. 6.3 Applicable Law. The rules, regulations, official policies, standards and specifications applicable to the Project (the “Applicable Law”) shall be those set forth in this Agreement and the Project Approvals, and, with respect to matters not addressed by this Agreement or the Project Approvals, those rules, regulations, official policies, standards and specifications (including City ordinances and resolutions) governing permitted uses, building locations, timing of construction, densities, design, heights, and fees in force and effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement. A list of Applicable Law is provided in Exhibit F. 6.4 Uniform Codes. City may apply to the Project Site, at any time during the Term, then current Uniform Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, and Fire Code and other uniform construction codes, and City’s then current design and construction standards for road and storm drain facilities, provided any such uniform code or standard has been adopted and uniformly applied by City on a citywide basis and provided that no such code or standard is adopted for the purpose of preventing or otherwise limiting Development of all or any part of the Project. 6.5 No Conflicting Enactments. Developer’s vested right to Develop the Project shall not be diminished by City approval (whether by action of the City Council or by initiative, referendum or other means) of any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, or standard that has legal force and affect (each individually, a “City Law”) that is in conflict with Applicable Law or this Agreement or that reduces the rights or assurances provided by this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any City Law shall be deemed to conflict with Applicable Law or this Agreement or reduce the Development rights provided hereby if it would accomplish any of the following 360 13 results, either by specific reference to the Project or as part of a general enactment which applies to or affects the Project: i. Change any land use designation or permitted use of either the Project or the Project Site, as applicable; ii. Prevent the availability of public utilities, services, or facilities, or any privileges or rights to public utilities, services, or facilities (for example, water rights, water connections or sewage capacity rights, sewer connections, etc.) for the Project, provided that Developer has complied with all applicable requirements for receiving or using public utilities, services, or facilities; iii. Prevent the location of buildings, structures, grading, or other improvements of the Project in a manner that is materially inconsistent with or materially more restrictive than the limitations included in the Project Approvals or the Subsequent Approvals (as and when they are issued); iv. Limit or control the rate, timing, phasing, or sequencing of the Development of all or any part of the Project in any manner; v. Result in Developer having to substantially delay Development of the Project or require the issuance of additional permits or approvals by City other than those required by Applicable Law; vi. Establish, enact, or impose against the Project or Project Site any fees, liens or other similar monetary obligations (including generating demolition permit fees, encroachment permit and grading permit fees) other than those specifically permitted by this Agreement or other connection fees imposed by third party utilities; vii. Impose against the Project any condition, dedication or other exaction not specifically authorized by Applicable Law; or viii. Limit the processing or procuring of applications and approvals of Subsequent Approvals. 6.6 Initiatives and Referenda; Other City Actions Related to Project. a. If any City Law is enacted or imposed by initiative or referendum, or by the City Council directly or indirectly in connection with any proposed initiative or referendum, which City Law would conflict with Applicable Law or this Agreement or reduce the Development rights provided by this Agreement, such Law shall only apply to the Project to the extent it would not diminish Developer's vested rights to Develop the Project. b. Except as authorized in Section 6.10, without limiting the generality of any of the foregoing, no moratorium or other limitation (whether relating to the 361 14 rate, timing, phasing or sequencing of Development) affecting subdivision maps, building permits or other entitlements to use that are approved or to be approved, issued or granted by the City shall diminish Developer’s vested rights to Develop the Project. c. To the maximum extent permitted by law, City shall cooperate with Developer and shall undertake such actions as may be necessary to ensure this Agreement remains in full force and effect. d. Developer reserves the right to challenge in court any City Law that would reduce the Development rights provided by this Agreement. 6.7 New Taxes. Any subsequently enacted City-wide taxes shall apply to the Project provided that the application of such taxes to the Project Site is prospective. Other than agreeing that Developer has no vested right against such new taxes, Developer does not waive its right to challenge the legality of any such taxes under the controlling law then in place. 6.8 Assessments. Nothing herein shall be construed to relieve the Project Site from assessments levied against it by City pursuant to any statutory procedure for the assessment of property to pay for infrastructure and/or services which benefit the Project Site. This Section 6.8 does not waive either Developer’s right to challenge the legality of any such assessments, except as provided herein. 6.9 Vote on Future Taxes, Assessments, and Fees. In the event that any assessment, fee or charge which is applicable to the Project Site is subject to Article XIIIC or XIIID of the California Constitution and Developer does not return its ballot, Developer agrees, on behalf of itself and its successors, that City may count Developer’s ballot as affirmatively voting in favor of such tax, assessment, fee or charge. 6.10 Environmental Review and Mitigation. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Project’s environmental document, the 2009 General Plan EIR and MMRP were intended to be used in connection with each of the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals needed for the Project. Consistent with the CEQA policies and requirements applicable to the Project’s environmental document and the Program EIR, City agrees to use the Project’s environmental document, Program EIR, and MMRP in connection with the processing of any Subsequent Approval to the maximum extent allowed by law and not to impose on the Project any mitigation measures other than those specifically imposed by the Project’s environmental document, Project Approvals, Program EIR, and MMRP, or specifically required by CEQA or other Applicable Law, except as provided for in this Section 6.7. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge that Subsequent Approvals may be eligible for one or more statutory or categorical exemptions under CEQA. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not limit or expand the operation or scope of CEQA, including Public Resources Code section 21166 and California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15162, with respect to City’s consideration of any Subsequent Approval. Consistent with CEQA, a future, additional CEQA document may be prepared for any Subsequent Approval only to the extent required by 362 15 Public Resources Code section 21166 and California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15162, unless otherwise requested in writing by Developer. Developer specifically acknowledges and agrees that, under Public Resources Code section 21166 and California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15162, City as lead agency is responsible and retains sole discretion to determine whether an additional CEQA document must be prepared, which discretion City agrees it shall not exercise unreasonably or delay. 6.11 Future Legislative Actions. (a) In the event that, following the Effective Date, City revises, modifies, updates, or amends the land use designation(s) of the General Plan, that are applicable to the Project Site, or the zoning designation(s) applicable to the Project Site and in effect on the Effective Date, such updates or amendments shall not diminish Developer’s vested rights to Develop the Project or the Project Site, but no provision of this Agreement shall limit Developer’s right to apply for any land use entitlement(s) for the Project Site that are consistent with, or authorized by, such update(s) or amendment(s). Developer acknowledges, however, that the amended or updated policies identified in the immediately preceding sentence might include requirements for permitted development that would be in addition to any obligations of Developer under this Agreement, and that those additional requirements would apply to Developer if Developer applies for any land use entitlement(s) for the Project Site that are consistent with, or authorized by, any revision, modification, update, or amendment contemplated by this subsection (b) of Section 6.8 of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement shall limit or restrain in any way Developer’s full participation in any and all public processes undertaken by City that are in any way related to revisions, modifications, amendments, or updates to the General Plan or the City of South San Francisco Municipal Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that future legislative actions increase the allowable density or development capacities on the Project Site, any future development application seeking to utilize such increased density or capacity shall not be allowed to utilize any increased parking ratio authorized by this Agreement by-right. (b) Developer acknowledges that, if it applies for any land use entitlement(s) for the Project Site that are consistent with, or authorized by, any revision, modification, update, or amendment contemplated by this Agreement, and that would allow development of the Project Site in a manner that is inconsistent with, or not authorized by, the Project Approvals, then City may be required to conduct additional CEQA review with respect to such application in accordance with Section 6.10 of this Agreement, and, if such application is finally approved by City and becomes effective, such approval shall automatically be vested under this Agreement only to the extent such approval is consistent with, or authorized by, the Project Approvals. By way of example, if (following any required CEQA compliance) such effective approval were to authorize Development of a structure with a floor area ratio of 2.0, but the Project Approvals would only authorize Development of a structure with a floor area ratio of 1.0, then Developer would automatically have the vested right to Develop said structure with a floor area ratio of 1.0, and would automatically have the non-vested right to Develop that same structure with a floor area ratio of 2.0 (unless, following such approval, this Agreement is amended to vest Developer’s right to Develop such structure with a floor area ratio of 2.0). (c) City agrees that, if Developer applies for any land use entitlement(s) for the Project Site that are inconsistent with, or not authorized by, the Project Approvals, then: 363 16 i. such event shall not be a basis for amending or revisiting the terms of the Agreement, unless Developer also applies for an amendment of this Agreement pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 7.2 of this Agreement (i.e., a non-Administrative Agreement Amendment), and shall not be a basis for imposing new exactions, mitigation requirements, conditions of approval, or any other requirement of, or precondition to, Developer’s exercise of its Development rights vested under this Agreement; and ii. the only exactions, mitigation requirements, or conditions of approval City may impose on such land use entitlement shall be limited to those exactions, mitigation requirements, or conditions of approval authorized under federal, state, or local laws in effect at the time such application is deemed complete, and shall only be imposed with respect to those uses, densities, intensities, and other Development standards applicable to the Project Site that are inconsistent with, or not authorized by, the Project Approvals. 6.12 Life of Subdivision Maps, Development Approvals, and Permits. The term of any subdivision map or any other map, permit, rezoning, or other land use entitlement approved as a Project Approval or Subsequent Approval shall automatically be extended for the longer of the Term (including any extensions) or the term otherwise applicable to such Project Approval or Subsequent Approval if this Agreement is no longer in effect. The Term of this Agreement and the term of any subdivision map or other Project Approval or Subsequent Approval shall not include any period of time during which a Development moratorium (including, but not limited to, a water or sewer moratorium or water and sewer moratorium) or the actions of other public agencies that regulate land use, Development or the provision of services to the land, prevents, prohibits or delays the construction of the Project or a lawsuit involving any such Development approvals or permits is pending. 6.13 State and Federal Law. As provided in Government Code section 65869.5, this Agreement shall not preclude the application to the Project of changes in laws, regulations, plans or policies, to the extent that such changes are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations. Not in limitation of the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude City from imposing on Developer any fee specifically mandated and required by state or federal laws and regulations (except as provided in Section 5.5(b)). In the event of any changes required by state or federal laws or regulations, the Developer and City shall meet and confer in good faith to determine what, if any, modifications to this Agreement and/or the Project Approvals would allow the Project and City to comply with such state or federal law or regulation while preserving to the maximum extent feasible the spirit and intent of the Parties in this Agreement and the Project Approvals. 6.14 Timing and Review of Project Construction and Completion. Except as expressly provided in the Project Approvals, Developer shall have the vested right to Develop the Project in such order, at such rate and at such times as the Developer deems appropriate in the exercise of its sole business judgment. In particular, and not in any limitation of 364 17 any of the foregoing, since the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to consider, and expressly provide for, the timing of Development resulted in a later-adopted initiative restricting the timing of Development to prevail over such Parties’ agreement, it is the desire of the Parties hereto to avoid that result. The Parties acknowledge that, except as otherwise provided for in the Project Approvals, Developer shall have the vested right to Develop the Project on the Project Site in such order and at such rate and at such times as the Developer deems appropriate in the exercise of its business judgment. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any obligation for Developer to complete development of the Project, or any portion thereof, but if and when Developer commences construction, Developer must comply with any requirements of the Project Approvals, including Subsequent Project Approvals. ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENT 7.1 Project Amendments. To the extent permitted by state and federal law, any Project Approval or Subsequent Approval may, from time to time, be amended or modified in the following manner: a. Administrative Project Amendments. Upon the written request of Developer for an amendment or modification to a Project Approval or Subsequent Approval, City’s Chief Planner or his/her designee shall determine: (i) whether the requested amendment or modification is minor when considered in light of the Project as a whole; and (ii) whether the requested amendment or modification is consistent with this Agreement and Applicable Law. If the Chief Planner or his/her designee finds that the proposed amendment or modification is minor, consistent with this Agreement and Applicable Law, and will result in no new significant impacts not addressed and mitigated pursuant to Section 6.10, the amendment shall be determined to be an “Administrative Project Amendment” and the Chief Planner or his/her designee may, except to the extent otherwise required by law, approve the Administrative Project Amendment without notice and public hearing. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lot line adjustments, minor alterations in vehicle circulation patterns or vehicle access points, location of parking stalls on the site, number of required parking stalls if City development standards allow, substitutions of comparable landscaping for any landscaping shown on any final development plan or landscape plan, variations in the location of structures that do not substantially alter the design concepts of the Project, location or installation of utilities and other infrastructure connections or facilities that do not substantially alter the design concepts of the Project, and minor adjustments to the Project Site diagram or Project Site legal description shall be treated as Administrative Project Amendments. Any requested amendment seeking modification of or deviation from the performance or development standards contained in the Municipal Code and which would otherwise require a discretionary 365 18 approval by the City Council, Planning Commission, or other formal approval body shall not be treated as an Administrative Project Amendment. b. Non-Administrative Project Amendments. Any request by Developer for an amendment or modification to a Project Approval or Subsequent Approval which is determined not to be an Administrative Project Amendment as set forth above shall be subject to review, consideration and action pursuant to the Applicable Law and this Agreement. c. Project Amendment Exemptions. Except as may be required by Section 7.2 (b), no amendment of a Project Approval or Subsequent Approval, or a Subsequent Approval shall require an amendment to this Agreement. Instead, any such matter automatically shall be deemed to be incorporated into the Project and vested under this Agreement. 7.2 Amendment of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time, in whole or in part, by mutual written consent of the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, as follows: a. Administrative Agreement Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement which does not substantially affect (i) the Term of this Agreement, (ii) permitted uses of the Project Site, (iii) provisions for the reservation or dedication of land, (iv) conditions, terms, restrictions, or requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, (v) the density or intensity of use of the Project Site or the maximum height or size of proposed buildings (vi) monetary contributions by Developer, (vii) rights or benefits to assignee(s), or obligations of the requesting Developer that directly affect any assignee interest, without written consent of assignee(s), or (viii) cancellation, in whole or part of this Agreement, shall be considered an “Administrative Agreement Amendment” and shall not, except to the extent otherwise required by law, require notice or public hearing before the parties may execute an amendment hereto. Administrative Agreement Amendments may be approved by the City Manager or, in the sole discretion of the City Manager, the City Manager may refer any proposed Administrative Agreement Amendment to the City Council for consideration and approval or denial in his or her reasonable discretion. b. Other Agreement Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement other than an Administrative Agreement Amendment shall be subject to mutual voluntary agreement by the City and Developer and recommendation by the Planning Commission (by advisory resolution) and approval by the City Council (by ordinance) following a duly noticed public hearing before the Planning Commission and City Council, consistent with Government Code sections 65867 and 65867.5. 366 19 ARTICLE 8 ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER 8.1 Assignment and Transfer Developer may transfer or assign all or any portion of its interests, rights, or obligations under the Agreement and the Project approvals to third parties acquiring an interest or estate in the Project or the Project Site or any portions thereof including, without limitation, purchasers or lessees of lots, parcels, or facilities. Prior to any such transfer or assignment, Developer will seek City’s prior written consent thereof, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. City may refuse to give consent only if, in light of the proposed transferee’s reputation and financial resources, such transferee would not, in City’s reasonable opinion, be able to perform the obligations proposed to be assumed by such transferee. To assist the City Manager in determining whether to provide consent to a transfer or assignment, the City Manager may request from the transferee (directly or through Developer) reasonable documentation of transferee’s understanding of, financial capacity, and ability and plan to perform the obligations proposed to be assumed by transferee, including without limitation obligations specifically identified in this Agreement, including all Project Approvals. Such determination will be made by the City Manager and will be appealable by Developer to the City Council. For any transfer of all or any portion of the Project Site, the Developer and assignee shall enter into an assignment and assumption agreement in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit F. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, each of following Transfers are permitted and shall not require City consent under this Section 8.1: i. Any transfer for financing purposes to secure the funds necessary for construction and/or permanent financing of the Project (including but not limited to any foreclosure, deed of trust, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or other similar conveyance or transfer in connection therewith); ii. An assignment of this Agreement to an Affiliate; iii. Transfers of common area to a property owners association; iv. Dedications and grants of easements and rights of way required in accordance with the Project Approvals; or v. Any leasing activity. For the purposes of this Section 8.1, “Affiliate” means an entity or person that is directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control or management of or with Developer. For the purposes of this definition, “control” means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of an entity or a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise, and the terms “controlling” and “controlled” have the meanings correlative to the foregoing. ARTICLE 9 COOPERATION IN THE EVENT OF LEGAL CHALLENGE 367 20 9.1 Cooperation. In the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any person not a party to the Agreement challenging the validity of any provision of the Agreement, or any Project Approval or Subsequent Approval (“Legal Challenge”), the Parties will cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. City shall promptly (within five business days) notify Developer of any such Legal Challenge against City. If City fails promptly to notify Developer of any Legal Challenge against City or if City fails to cooperate in the defense, Developer will not thereafter be responsible for City’s defense. The Parties will use best efforts to select mutually agreeable legal counsel to defend such Legal Challenge, and Developer will pay compensation for such legal counsel (including City Attorney time and overhead for the defense of such action), but will exclude other City staff overhead costs and normal day-to-day business expenses incurred by City. Developer’s obligation to pay for legal counsel will extend to attorneys’ fees incurred on appeal. In the event City and Developer are unable to select mutually agreeable legal counsel to defend such Legal Challenge, each party may select its own legal counsel and Developer will pay its and City’s attorneys’ fees and costs. Developer shall reimburse City for all reasonable court costs and attorneys’ fees expended by City in defense of any such Legal Challenge or payable to any prevailing plaintiff/petitioner. 9.2 Reapproval. (a) If, as a result of any Legal Challenge, all or any portion of the Agreement or the Project Approvals are set aside or otherwise made ineffective by any judgment in such action or proceeding (“Judgment”), based on procedural, substantive or other deficiencies (“Deficiencies”), the Parties will use their respective best efforts to sustain and reenact or readopt the Agreement, and/or the Project approvals, that the Deficiencies related to, as follows, unless the Parties mutually agree in writing to act otherwise: (i) If any Judgment requires reconsideration or consideration by City of the Agreement or any Project Approval, then City will consider or reconsider that matter in a manner consistent with the intent of the Agreement and with Applicable Law. If any such Judgment invalidates or otherwise makes ineffective all or any portion of the Agreement or Project Approval, then the Parties will cooperate and will cure any Deficiencies identified in the Judgment or upon which the Judgment is based in a manner consistent with the intent of the Agreement and with Applicable Law. City will then consider readopting or reenacting the Agreement, or the Project Approval, or any portion thereof, to which the Deficiencies related. (ii) Acting in a manner consistent with the intent of the Agreement includes, but is not limited to, recognizing that the Parties intend that Developer may undertake and complete Development of the Project as described in the Agreement, and adopting such ordinances, resolutions, and other enactments as are necessary to readopt or reenact all or any portion of the Agreement or Project Approvals without contravening the Judgment. (iii) The Parties agree that this Section 9.2 shall constitute a separate agreement entered into concurrently, and that if any other provision of this Agreement, or the Agreement as a whole, is invalidated, rendered null, or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Parties 368 21 agree to be bound by the terms of this Section 9.2, which shall survive invalidation, nullification, or setting aside. ARTICLE 10 DEFAULT; REMEDIES; TERMINATION 10.1 Defaults. Any failure by either Party to perform any provision of the Agreement, which failure continues uncured for a period of thirty (30) days following written notice of such failure from the other Party (unless such period is extended by mutual written consent), will constitute a default (“Default”) under the Agreement. Any notice given will specify the nature of the alleged failure and, where appropriate, the manner in which said failure satisfactorily may be cured. If the nature of the alleged failure is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within such 30-day period, then the commencement of the cure within such time period, and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure thereafter, will be deemed to be a cure within such 30-day period. Upon the occurrence of a Default under the Agreement, the non-defaulting party may institute legal proceedings to enforce the terms of the Agreement or, in the event of a material Default, terminate the Agreement. If the Default is cured, then no Default will exist and the noticing party shall take no further action. 10.2 Termination. If City elects to consider terminating the Agreement due to a material Default of Developer, then City will give a notice of intent to terminate the Agreement and the matter will be scheduled for consideration and review by the City Council at a duly noticed and conducted public hearing. Developer will have the right to offer written and oral evidence prior to or at the time of said public hearings. If the City Council determines that a material Default has occurred and is continuing, and elects to terminate the Agreement, City will give written notice of termination of the Agreement to Developer by certified mail and the Agreement will thereby be terminated sixty (60) days thereafter. 10.3 Enforced Delay; Extension of Time of Performance. Subject to the limitations set forth below, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement (including but not limited to the Term) shall be extended, where delays are due to: war; insurrection; strikes and labor disputes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; terrorism; epidemics or pandemics; quarantine or shelter-in- place restrictions; freight embargoes; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation and arbitration, including court delays; legal challenges to this Agreement, the Project Approvals, Subsequent Approvals, or any other approval required for the Project or any initiatives or referenda regarding the same; environmental conditions that have not been previously disclosed or discovered or that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence that delays the construction or Development of the Project Site or any portion thereof; unusually severe weather but only to the extent that such weather or its effects (including, without limitation, dry out time) result in delays that cumulatively exceed thirty (30) days for every winter season occurring after commencement of construction of the Project; acts or omissions of the other party; or acts or 369 22 failures to act of any public or governmental agency or entity (except that acts or failures to act of City shall not excuse performance by City); moratorium; or a Severe Economic Recession (each a “Force Majeure Delay”). An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if a written notice by the Party claiming such extension (“Notice of Force Majeure Delay”) is sent to the other Party within sixty (60) days of the commencement of the cause. If a Notice of Force Majeure Delay is sent after such sixty (60) day period, then the extension shall commence to run no sooner than sixty (60) days prior to the giving of such Notice of Force Majeure Delay. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and Developer. Developer’s inability or failure to obtain financing or otherwise timely satisfy shall not be deemed to be a cause outside the reasonable control of the Developer and shall not be the basis for an excused delay unless such inability, failure or delay is a direct result of a Severe Economic Recession. “Severe Economic Recession” means a decline in the monetary value of all finished goods and services produced in the United States, as measured by initial quarterly estimates of United States Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) published by the United States Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (and not subsequent monthly revisions), lasting more than four (4) consecutive calendar quarters. Any quarter of flat or positive GDP growth shall end the period of such Severe Economic Recession. 10.4 Legal Action. Either Party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement in the Agreement, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation thereof, and enforce by specific performance or declaratory relief the obligations and rights of the Parties thereto. Except as provided in Section 10.1, the sole and exclusive remedies for any Default or violation of the Agreement will be specific performance or declaratory relief. In any proceeding brought to enforce the Agreement, the prevailing Party will be entitled to recover from the unsuccessful Party all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the prevailing party in the enforcement proceeding. 10.5 Periodic Review. (a) Conducting the Periodic Review. Throughout the Term, at least once every twelve (12) months following the Effective Date of this Agreement, City shall review the extent of good- faith compliance by Developer with the terms of this Agreement. This review (“Periodic Review”) shall be conducted by the Chief Planner or his/her designee and shall be limited in scope to compliance with the terms of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code section 65865.1. At least ten (10) days prior to the Periodic Review, and in the manner prescribed in Section 11.9 of this Agreement, City shall deposit in the mail or transmit electronically to Developer a copy of any staff report and documents to be relied upon in conducting the Periodic Review and, to the extent practical, related exhibits concerning Developer’s performance hereunder. (b) Developer Submission of Periodic Review Report. Annually commencing one year from the Effective Date and continuing through termination of this Agreement, Developer shall submit a report to the Chief Planner stating the Developer’s good faith compliance with terms of the Agreement. 370 23 (c) Good Faith Compliance Review. During the Periodic Review, the Chief Planner shall set a meeting to consider the Developer’s good-faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Developer shall be permitted an opportunity to respond to City’s evaluation of Developer’s performance, either orally at the meeting or in a supplemental written statement, at Developer’s election. Such response shall be made to the Chief Planner. At the conclusion of the Periodic Review, the Chief Planner shall make written findings and determinations, on the basis of substantial evidence, as to whether or not Developer has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The decision of the Chief Planner shall be appealable to the City Council. If the Chief Planner finds and determines that Developer has not complied with such terms and conditions, the Chief Planner may recommend to the City Council that it terminate or modify this Agreement by giving notice of its intention to do so, in the manner set forth in Government Code sections 65867 and 65868. The costs incurred by City in connection with the Periodic Review process described herein shall be borne by Developer. (d) Failure to Properly Conduct Periodic Review. If City fails, during any calendar year, to either: (i) conduct the Periodic Review or (ii) notify Developer in writing of City’s determination, pursuant to a Periodic Review, as to Developer’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement and such failure remains uncured as of December 31 of any year during the Term, such failure shall be conclusively deemed an approval by City of Developer’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement for the period of time since the last Periodic Review. (e) Written Notice of Compliance. With respect to any year for which Developer has been determined or deemed to have complied with this Agreement, City shall, within thirty (30) days following request by Developer, execute and deliver to Developer (or to any party requested by Developer) a written “Notice of Compliance,” in recordable form, duly executed and acknowledged by City, that certifies: i. The Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect, or if there have been modifications hereto, that this Agreement is in full force and effect as modified and stating the date and nature of such modifications; ii. That there are no current uncured defaults under this Agreement or specifying the dates and nature of any such default; iii. Any other information reasonably requested by Developer. City’s failure to deliver to Developer such a Notice of Compliance within such time shall constitute a conclusive presumption against City that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification, except as may be represented by Developer, and that there are no uncured defaults in the performance of Developer, except as may be represented by Developer. Developer shall have the right, in Developer’s sole discretion, to record such Notice of Compliance. 10.6 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall be filed and heard in the Superior Court of San Mateo County, California. 371 24 10.7 Resolution of Disputes. With regard to any dispute involving Development of the Project, the resolution of which is not provided for by this Agreement or Applicable Law, Developer shall, at City’s request, meet with City and Developer and the City representatives shall attempt in good faith to resolve any such disputes. Nothing in this Section 10.7 shall in any way be interpreted as requiring that Developer and City and/or City’s designee reach agreement with regard to those matters being addressed, nor shall the outcome of these meetings be binding in any way on City or Developer unless expressly agreed to by the authorized parties to such meetings. 10.8 Attorneys’ Fees. In any legal action or other proceeding brought by either Party to enforce or interpret a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and any other costs incurred in that proceeding in addition to any other relief to which it is entitled. 10.9 Hold Harmless. Developer shall hold, to the fullest extent permitted by law, City and its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees, and representatives harmless from claims, costs, and liabilities for any personal injury, death, or property damage which is a result of, or alleged to be the result of, the construction of the Project, or of obligations or of operations performed under this Agreement by Developer or by Developer’s contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees, whether such operations were performed by Developer or any of Developer’s contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees. Nothing in this Section 10.9 shall be construed to mean that Developer shall hold City harmless from any claims of personal injury, death or property damage arising from, or alleged to arise from, any gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of City, its elected and appointed representatives, offices, agents and employees. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS 11.1 Incorporation of Recitals and Introductory Paragraph. The Recitals contained in this Agreement, and the introductory paragraph preceding the Recitals, are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 11.2 No Agency. It is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the Parties hereto that: (i) the subject Project is a private development; (ii) City has no interest or responsibilities for, or duty to, third parties concerning any improvements until such time, and only until such time, that City accepts the same pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement or in connection with the various Project Approvals or Subsequent Approvals; (iii) Developer shall have full power over and exclusive control of the Project herein described, subject only to the limitations and obligations of Developer under this Agreement, the Project Approvals, Subsequent Approvals, and Applicable Law; and (iv) City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form of agency relationship, joint venture or partnership between City and Developer and agree that nothing 372 25 contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as creating any such relationship between City and Developer. 11.3 Enforceability. City and Developer agree that unless this Agreement is amended or terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding any change hereafter enacted or adopted (whether by ordinance, resolution, initiative, or any other means) in any General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, or any other land use ordinance or building ordinance, resolution or other rule, regulation or policy adopted by City that changes, alters or amends the rules, regulations, and policies applicable to the Development of the Project Site as of the Effective Date as provided by Government Code section 65866. 11.4 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of any term or provision of this Agreement to a particular situation, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement, or the application of this Agreement to other situations, shall continue in full force and effect unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any material provision of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to a particular situation, is held to be invalid, void or unenforceable, either City or Developer may (in their sole and absolute discretion) terminate this Agreement by providing written notice of such termination to the other party. 11.5 Other Necessary Acts and City Approvals. Each party shall execute and deliver to the other all such other further instruments and documents as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the Project Approvals, Subsequent Approvals and this Agreement and to provide and secure to the other party the full and complete enjoyment of its rights and privileges hereunder. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by City, the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to act on behalf of City, unless specifically provided otherwise by this Agreement or Applicable Law. 11.6 Construction. Each reference in this Agreement or any of the Project Approvals or Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement, Project Approval, or Subsequent Approval as it may be amended from time to time, whether or not the particular reference refers to such possible amendment. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both City and Developer, and no presumption or rule that ambiguities shall be construed against the drafting party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. 373 26 11.7 Other Miscellaneous Terms. The singular shall include the plural; the masculine gender shall include the feminine; “shall” is mandatory; “may” is permissive. If there is more than one signer of this Agreement, the signer obligations are joint and several. 11.8 Covenants Running with the Land. All of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring all or a portion of the Project Site, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. All of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and shall constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to California law including, without limitation, Civil Code section 1468. Each covenant herein to act or refrain from acting is for the benefit of or a burden upon the Project, as appropriate, runs with the Project Site, and is binding upon the owner of all or a portion of the Project Site and each successive owner during its ownership of such Project Site. 11.9 Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between City or Developer must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by email (with original forwarded by regular U.S. Mail), by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), or by Federal Express or other similar courier promising overnight delivery. If personally delivered, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed. If delivered by email, a notice shall be deemed given upon verification of receipt if received before 5:00 p.m. on a regular business day, or else on the next business day. If given by registered or certified mail, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of: (i) actual receipt by any of the addressees designated below as the Party to whom notices are to be sent, or (ii) five (5) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If given by Federal Express or similar courier, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date delivered as shown on a receipt issued by the courier. Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below: If to City, to: City of South San Francisco Attn: City Manager 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Phone: (650) 877-8500 Email: sharon.ranals@ssf.net 374 27 With a Copy to: Redwood Public Law, LLP Attn: Sky Woodruff 409 13th Street Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 282-6001 Email: sky@redwoodpubliclaw.com If to Developer, to: US 180 El Camino Real, LLC Attn: Steve Dunn 999 Baker Way, Suite 200 San Mateo, CA 94404 Phone (650) 235-2833 Email: sdunn@steelwavellc.com With a Copy to: Holland & Knight LLP Attn: Tamsen Plume 560 Mission St. Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 743-6941 Email: tamsen.plume@hklaw.com Any Party hereto may at any time, by giving ten (10) days written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given. 11.10 Mortgagee Protection. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer, in any manner, at Developer’s sole discretion, from encumbering the Project Site or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any lien of mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device securing financing with respect to the Project or the Project Site (“Mortgage”). City acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require, in addition to estoppel certificates as set forth in Section 4.7, certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Developer and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purpose of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee of the Project Site shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: (a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any Mortgage on the Project Site made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law. (b) If City timely receives a request from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of Default given to Developer under this Agreement, City shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of Default to Developer or within ten (10) days of receiving a request, if a Mortgagee has not provided a request prior to the City sending a notice of Default to Developer. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure 375 28 the Default during the remaining cure period allowed such Party under this Agreement plus an additional ten (10) days. (c) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Project Site, or any portion thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the Mortgage or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Project Site, or portion thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of Developer’s obligations or other affirmative covenants of Developer hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; provided, however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by Developer is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue to be condition precedent to City’s performance hereunder, and further provided that any sales, transfer, or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 8.1 of this Agreement. 11.11 Entire Agreement, Counterparts And Exhibits. This Agreement is executed in two (2) duplicate counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement consists of [___________] ([__]) [insert in execution version] pages, exclusive of signature pages, and six (6) exhibits which constitute in full, the final and exclusive understanding and agreement of the Parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements of the Parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and the Developer. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein for all purposes: Exhibit A: Description and Diagram of Project Site Exhibit B: List of Project Approvals as of Effective Date Exhibit C: City Fees, Exactions and Payments Exhibit D: Sustainability Features Exhibit E: Applicable Laws Exhibit F: Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement 11.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is intended for the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns, and is not for the benefit of, nor may any express or implied provision hereof be enforced by, any other person, except as otherwise set forth in Section 11.10. 11.13 Recordation Of Development Agreement. Pursuant to Government Code section 65868.5, no later than ten (10) days after City enters into this Agreement, the City Clerk shall record an executed copy of this Agreement in the Official Records of the County of San Mateo. 376 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into by and between Developer and City as of the day and year first above written. [Signatures to follow on subsequent pages.] 377 S-1 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC CITY: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a California municipal corporation By: Date: Name: Sharon Ranals Its: City Manager ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney [Insert Notary Acknowledgment] 378 S-2 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC DEVELOPER: By: Date: Name: Its: By: Date: Name: Its: [Insert Notary Acknowledgment] 379 A-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit A Description and Diagram of Project Site (Starts on Next Page) 380 B-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit B List of Project Approvals as of Effective Date • Conditional Use Permit (UP21-0013), • Design Review (DR21-0045), • Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM21-0012), • Tentative Parcel Map (PM21-0003), and • Overrule of San Mateo County Association of Governments (C/CAG) Airport Land Use Commission determination of inconsistency with respect to Noise Policies for the proposed residential portion of the Project. 381 C-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit C City Fees, Exactions, and Payments Excerpt from Adopted Conditions of Approval on 9/14/2022. Full Conditions of Approval here: https://ci-ssf-ca.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5822040&GUID=B90E9F98-417E- 4B70-B3BE-1804BC50458A&Options=&Search= 382 C-2 383 C-3 384 D-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit D Sustainability Features • Design Features o Primarily glass façades, thereby bringing an abundance of natural light into each building; and o Management of stormwater runoff using low-impact development (LID) methods, where feasible. This approach implements engineered controls to allow stormwater filtering, storage, and flood control. Bioretention basins, flow-through planters, Silva Cell units, and other site design features to manage stormwater runoff flows and reduce stormwater pollution would be located throughout the project site. • Transportation o Pedestrian circulation improvements; o Bicycle parking; and o TDM Plan to encourage alternative forms of transportation. • Energy / Greenhouse Gas Emissions o Photovoltaic (PV) ready; o a high-performance building envelope and heating, ventilation, and air- conditioning (HVAC) systems; and o EV charging infrastructure. • Waste Reduction o On-site recycling and composting facilities; and o Construction and demolition; 100 percent of all inert solids (i.e., building materials) and 65 percent of non-inert solids (i.e., all other materials) would be recycled as required by the City under Chapter 15.60 of the City’s Municipal Code. • Water Conservation o Ultra-efficient WaterSense-labeled flush and flow fixtures; and o Low-water demand native and/or adapted vegetation with efficient irrigation systems. 385 4867-9363-4824.12 E-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit E Applicable Laws Developer shall comply with the following City regulations and provisions applicable to the Project Site as of the Project Application Complete Date and Effective Date of this Agreement (except as modified by this Agreement and the Project Approvals): • 2009 General Plan • 2022 Zoning Code 386 F-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND US 180 El CAMINO REAL, LLC Exhibit F Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Starts on Next Page) 387 F-2 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of South San Francisco Attn: City Clerk 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 ______________________________________________________________________________ Space Above for Recorder’s Use Exempt from Recording Fees per Cal. Gov. Code § 6103 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT This Assignment and Assumption Agreement (“Assignment Agreement”) is entered into to be effective on ______, 202_, by and between US 180 El Camino Real, LLC (“Assignor”), and ___________________, a _______________ (“Assignee”), and the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation (“City”). Assignor and Assignee are sometimes referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. Assignor and City have previously entered into that certain Development Agreement between City and Assignor dated ________, 2025, approved by the City of South San Francisco City Council by Ordinance No. ________ on _________,2025 and recorded on ______________, 2025 as Document No. ______________, San Mateo County Official Records (“Development Agreement”) to facilitate the development and redevelopment of that certain real property within the City of South San Francisco, California, which is legally described in Exhibit A of the Development Agreement (“Property”). B. Assignor is the fee owner of the Property, and Assignor desires to convey its interest in the developable, approximately [_] acre portion of the Property and more particularly described on Exhibit 2 attached hereto (“Assigned Property”) to Assignee concurrently with execution of this Assignment Agreement; and Assignee desires to so acquire such interest in the Assigned Property from the Assignor. C. The Parties desire to enter into this Assignment Agreement in order to satisfy and fulfill their respective obligations under Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Assignment by Assignor. Assignor hereby assigns, transfers and grants to Assignee, and its successors and assigns, all of Assignor’s rights, title and interest and obligations, 388 F-3 duties, responsibilities, conditions and restrictions under the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Property and only to the extent accruing or arising on and after the Effective Date (collectively, the “Assigned Rights and Obligations”). 2. Acknowledgement and Assumption of Obligations by Assignee. Assignee, for itself and its successor and assigns, hereby acknowledges that it has reviewed, is aware of and intends to honor its Assigned Rights and Obligations with respect to its Development of the Assigned Property pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement, and additionally expressly and unconditionally assumes all of the Assigned Rights and Obligations. Assignee agrees, expressly for the benefit of Assignor and City, to comply with, perform, and execute all of the Assigned Rights and Obligations. 3. Release of Assignor. Assignee and City hereby fully release Assignor from all Assigned Rights and Obligations. Both Assignor and Assignee acknowledge that this Assignment Agreement is intended to fully assign all of the Assigned Rights and Obligations to Assignee, and it is expressly understood that Assignor shall continue to be obligated under the Development Agreement only with respect to those portions of the Project Site retained by Assignor. 4. Substitution of Assignor. Assignee hereinafter shall be substituted for and replace Assignor in the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Property. Whenever the term “Developer” appears in the Development Agreement, it shall hereinafter include Assignee with respect to the Assigned Property. 5. Development Agreement in Full Force and Effect. Except as specifically provided herein with respect to the assignment and assumption, all the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of the Development Agreement are hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect. 6. Recording. Assignor shall cause this Assignment Agreement to be recorded in the Official Records of San Mateo County, California, and shall promptly provide conformed copies of the recorded Assignment Agreement to Assignee and City. 7. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Assignment Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 8. Applicable Law/Venue. This Assignment Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without reference to choice of law provisions. Any legal actions under this Assignment Agreement shall be brought only in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo, State of California. 9. Applicable Law/Venue. This Assignment Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without reference to choice of law provisions. Any legal actions under this Assignment Agreement shall be brought only in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo, State of California. 10. Interpretation. All parties have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this Assignment Agreement, and this Assignment Agreement shall be 389 F-4 construed according to the fair meaning of its language. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Assignment Agreement. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) the plural and singular numbers shall each be deemed to include the other; (b) the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders shall each be deemed to include the others; (c) “shall,” “will,” or “agrees” are mandatory, and “may” is permissive; (d) “or” is not exclusive; and (e) “includes” and “including” are not limiting. 11. Severability. Except as otherwise provided herein, if any provision(s) of this Assignment Agreement is (are) held invalid, the remainder of this Assignment Agreement shall not be affected, except as necessarily required by the invalid provisions, and shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the parties. 12. Counterparts. This Assignment Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument, with the same effect as if all of the parties to this Assignment Agreement had executed the same counterpart. 13. City Consent. City is executing this Assignment Agreement for the limited purpose of consenting to the assignment and assumption and clarifying that there is privity of contract between City and Assignee with respect to the Development Agreement. 14. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Assignment Agreement shall be the date upon which Assignee obtains fee title to the Assigned Property by duly recorded deed (“Effective Date”). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor, Assignee and City have entered into this Assignment Agreement as of the date first written above. ASSIGNOR: US 180 EL CAMINO REAL, LLC By: Signature of Person executing the Agreement on behalf of Assignor Name: Title: 390 F-5 ASSIGNEE: [INSERT NAME OF ASSIGNEE] By: Signature of Person executing the Agreement on behalf of Assignee Name: Title: CITY: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation By: Signature of Person executing the Agreement on behalf of City Name: Title: City Manager Approved as to form by: By: Signature of Person approving form of the Agreement on behalf of City Name: Title: City Attorney 391 From:Wu, Elton H To:Planning Commission Comments Cc:Wilson, Joanne; Read, Emily; Leung, Tracy; Feng, Stacie; Rodgers, Heather Subject:180 El Camino Real, South San Francisco- Public Notice Date:Monday, August 18, 2025 2:29:55 PM [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of South San Francisco -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Hello, Thank you for the public notification regarding the entitlements to construct a new Office/R&D Campus and multi-family residential building in South San Francisco. Regarding the proposed project at 180 El Camino Real, please be advised that the SFPUC’s San Andreas Water Transmission Pipeline No. 1 is located adjacent to theproject site within the El Camino Real Public Right of Way. Please require that the project sponsor submit an Underground Service Alert (USA) request prior to commencing construction. If the proposed project involves digging or excavation around or near the SFPUC's pipeline, further review will be required. Pleasecoordinate with our Land Engineering Team, Tracy Leung and Stacie Feng, who are copied on this email. This project may require further review under the SFPUC's Project Review process. Additional information regarding Project Review can be found here: https://sfpuc.org/construction-contracts/lands-rights-of-way/project- review-and-land-use-bay-area If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me. Thanks, Elton Wu Pronouns: He/ Him Environmental Compliance and Land Planner SFPUC Water Enterprise Natural Resources and Lands Management Division 525 Golden Gate Avenue, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 cell: (415) 971-7657 ewu@sfwater.org