HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 97-2002RESOLUTION NO. 97-2002
CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCSCIO EAST
OF ~--IIGHWAY 101 SEWER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN, EAST OF 101 SEWER
FACILITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY AND ESTABLISHING A
SEWER FACILITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EAST OF 101 AREA
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on October 13, 1999, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco
adopted the South San Francisco General Plan ("General Plan"); and
WHEREAS, the General Plan, as adopted and amended, applies to the East of 101 Area,
which is a Planning Area that includes the land within the jurisdictional limits of the city; and
WHEREAS, the City's adopted General Plan and East of 101 Area Plan include policies
addressing the need to expand the city's wastewater system to meet future growth (see General
Plan Policies 5.3-G-4 and 5.3-1-4 and East of 101 Area Plan Policy PF-3); and requiring that new
development pay its fair share toward upgrades to existing sewer facilities or construction of new
sewer facili :ies as those upgrades and facilities are necessitated by new development in the East
of 101 Area (see General Plan Policies 5.3-G-5 and 5.3-1-5); and
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco has retained Carollo Engineers to prepare
an East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan to assist the City in reviewing the needs of
residents and businesses through build-out under the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan identifies sewer
infrastructure improvements that are necessary in order to allow future development to occur in
the East of ~_01 area; and
WHEREAS, the City retained Bartle Wells to prepare an East of 101 Sewer Facility
Development Impact Fee Study to determine the level of fees necessary to generate funds to pay
for the sewer infrastructure facilities necessitated through build-out under the adopted General
Plan, as amended; and
WHEREAS, Bartle Wells has prepared and presented to the City Council an East of 101
Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee Study ("Sewer Facility Fee Study") which the Council
adopted at i:s October 23, 2002 meeting by resolution, which is attached as Exhibit A; and
WI-F~REAS, the Sewer Facility Fee Study estimates the cost of sewer infrastructure
improvements that are necessary to accommodate future development within the East of 101
Area; and
WHEREAS, the Sewer Facility Fee Study demonstrates the appropriateness of adopting
the sewer facility impact fee amounts included in this resolution based on current estimates of
the need for, and cost of, sewer infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate new
development, including: 1) an estimate of sewer capacity demand from new development; 2) an
estimate of :he increase in the East of 101 Area's development, and redevelopment, between the
year 2001 and the year 2020, the planning horizon anticipated to be used in future preparation of
a General Plan for the City; and 3) the cost of constructing the necessary sewer infrastructure
improvemerts to offset the impacts of the estimated sewer capacity demand generated in the East
of 101 Area through 2020; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code, at least 14 days prior to the
public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted, notice of the time and place of the heating
was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed
notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code, Exhibit A was available for
public review and comment for ten days prior to the public heating at which this resolution was
adopted; and
WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public heating at which this resolution was
adopted was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062(a) of the Government Code;
and
WHEREAS, the sewer improvements identified in the Sewer Facility Fee Study were
analyzed in the 2002 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the City for the
South San Francisco Sewer Improvement Program and potential impacts analyzed; and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2002, the City Council adopted the 2002 Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WI-[EREAS, the improvements identified in the 2002 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration will undergo additional separate environmental review once the improvements have
been sufficiently engineered to identify their scope and potential impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby makes the
following findings in support of the East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee.
Based on all the evidence in the record, including but not limited to: 1) The City of South San
Francisco General Plan and amendments thereto; 2) The East of 101 Supplemental
Environmertal Impact Report certified in 2001; 3) staff reports prepared for and distributed at
the duly noticed public heating conducted by the City Council on October 23, 2002; 4) testimony
and materials received at the aforementioned public hearing; and 5) the recitals of this
Resolution, the City Council finds as follows:
2
A. The City of South San Francisco East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact
Fee Study complies with California Government Code Section 66001 by establishing the basis
for imposition of the fee on new development in the East of 101 Area. The purpose of the Sewer
Facility Development Impact Fee set forth in this resolution is to finance sewer facility
improvemerts to reduce the impacts caused by future development in the East of 101 Area, as
further explained in Exhibit A. Such facilities are described in Exhibit A. The Sewer Facility
Fee Study further describes the following:
1. identifies the purpose of the fee;
2. identifies the use to which the fee will be put;
3. shows a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed;
4. shows a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and
the type of development project on which the fee is imposed;
5. shows a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of
the public facilities or portions of facilities attributable to the development on
which the fee is imposed.
B. The sewer facility development impact fee ("Impact Fee") collected pursuant to
this resolution shall be used to finance the sewer facility improvements described in Exhibit A.
C. After considering Exhibit A, the East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan,
the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, the testimony received at this noticed public
hearing, the agenda statements, the General Plan, and all correspondence received (together,
"Record"), the City Council approves and adopts Exhibit A and incorporates such report herein;
it further firds that future development in the city will generate the need for the sewer facility
improvemer_ts described in Exhibit A, and that such improvements are consistent with the
General Plan.
D. In adopting the Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee set forth in this
resolution, the City Council is exercising its powers under Article XI, Section 7 of the California
Constitutior.
E. The Record establishes:
1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the Impact Fee
set forth in this resolution (payment for certain listed sewer facility improvements) and the type
of developrr_ent projects on which such fee is imposed in that all new development in the East of
101 Area will generate or contribute to the need for the sewer facility improvements listed in
Exhibit A; and
2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the sewer
facility imp:ovements listed in Exhibit A and the type of development projects on which the
Impact Fee set forth in this resolution is imposed in that new development in the East of 101
Area will generate additional wastewater which must be collected by the city's sewer system and
such wastewater creates a demand for additional capacity which necessitates construction of the
improvements listed in Exhibit A; and
3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Impact
Fee set fortk in this resolution and the cost of the sewer facility improvements listed in Exhibit A
or that portion of such improvements attributable to the development on which such fee is
imposed in ;hat such fee is calculated based on the number of gallons per day of sewer capacity
needed by future development, the total cost of construction of such facilities, and the percentage
by which development within the city contributes to the need for such facilities; and
4. That the cost estimates set forth in Exhibit A are reasonable estimates for
the cost of tae sewer facility improvements listed therein, and the fees expected to be generated
by future development will not exceed the projected cost of such improvements; and
5. That the method of apportioning the fee set forth in this resolution to a
particular development bears a fair relationship and is roughly proportional to each
development's burden on and benefits from the improvements to be funded by such fee, in that
such fee is calculated based upon the projected ultimate sewer capacity needs each particular
development will generate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of South San Francisco does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee Study is hereby adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of South San Francisco does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee for Future Development within the
East of 101 Area, as set forth herein in Attachment 1 is hereby adopted.
Effective Date.
This resolu:ion shall become effective immediately. In accordance with Government Code
Section 66017, the Fee shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of this resolution.
4
Severability.
Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable. Should any
individual component of the Fee or any portion of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and
unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining Fee components and/or
resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those Fee
components and/or resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the
City of South San Francisco hereby declares that it would have adopted this resolution and each
section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact
that one or raore section, subsection, clause sentence, phrase or other portion may be held invalid
or unconstitutional.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of
October 2002 by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers Joseph A. Femekes, Raymond L. Green and Karyl Matsumoto,
Mayor Pro Tem Pedro Gonzalez and Mayor Eugene R. Mullin
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
5
3ARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
CITY'OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO.
EAST OF 101 SEWER FACILITY~
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
OCTOBER 2002
CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF 101
SEWER FACILITY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
October 2002
BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
Independent Public Finance Advisors
1889 Alcatraz Avenue
Berkeley CA 94703
Tel. 510/653-3399
BA~ITLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
1889 Alcatraz Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94703
510 653 3399 fax: 510 653 3769
www. bartlewells.corn
October 10, 2002
City of South San Francisco
400 Grard Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attn: John Gibbs, Public Works Director
Barbara Hawkins, City Engineer
Re: Development Impact Fee - East of Highway 101 Sewer Facilities
Bartle Wells Associates, independent public finance advisors, is pleased to present this report
determining an equitable impact fee applicable to new development for sewer facilities required
in the East of Highway 101 area of the City of South San Francisco. These facilities and costs
are shown in the City's East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan.
Development impact fees (impact fees) are levied to new customers as they connect to a
system, in this case the City's wastewater collection system in the East of 101 area. Under
California Government Code section 66000 and following, such charges are limited to
recovering the costs of facilities constructed to serve the new development. The Government
Code establishes criteria for what the City can charge. The report calculates an impact fee of
$3.19 per gallon per day (gpd) of anticipated sewage flow. For perspective, this charge
equates to $478 per equivalent dwelling unit with a flow of 150 gpd. New customers in the
East of 101 area will be charged this impact fee for sewer collection system improvements
needed to accommodate growth in the area as well as the City's existing wastewater
connection charge.
We have enjoyed working with the City on this project and appreciate the cooperation we have
received t¥om City staff and their engineering consultants. We are available to present our
findings and recommendations at a council meeting or other public meeting.
Very truly yours,
BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
Thomas E. Gaffney, Ca'Fa, PE
Principal
Sophia D. Skoda, Ch, F^, PE
Senior Consultant
Charter Member/National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors
CONTENTS
Purpose of Study .......................... . .................................................................................. 1
Mitigation Fee Act .......................................................................................................... 2
Costs Re;ated to New Development ................................................................................ 4
Capacity for New Development ...................................................................................... 8
Determination of Impact Fee ............................................................................................ 9
Adjusting Impact Fees .................................................................................................... 10
Accounting for Impact Fees ........................................................................................... 11
LIST OF TABLES
1. Capita: Improvement Program - All East of 101 Projects ............................................ 6
2. Development-Specific Projects .................................................................................... 7
3. Capacity Provided by Capital Improvement Program ................................................... 8
4. Sewer Collection System Impact Fee ......................................................................... 10
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - Mitigation Fee Act
APPENDIX B - Carollo Engineers - Projects, Costs, and Allocations
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF 101 SEWER FACILITY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Purpose of Study
The East of Highway 101 area of South San Francisco is the current and future home of
many of the City's biotech and other industrial businesses. The City recognizes, as
evidenced by policies in the General Plan and amendments, that providing adequate
infrastructure is a key element to attracting new business to the East of 101 area and to
sustaining growth in the area as projected in the General Plan buildout. Because of the
area's continuing redevelopment from industrial uses to Office/Research and Development
and Commercial uses, the projected demand on the sewer infrastructure now exceeds the
existing capacity of the local area wastewater collection system. The City instructed
Carollo Engineers to conduct a study of the capacity of the facilities and the improvements
needed Jo accommodate projected growth in the area. As part of this study, Bartle Wells
Associates (BWA) was asked to develop a recommended sewer facility development
impact fee (impact fee).
South San Francisco currently levies a sewer connection fee pursuant to South San
Francisco Municipal Code Section 14.12 to all users based on their actual use of existing
wastewater treatment facilities, including the City's collection system. The Sewer Facility
Impact Tee developed in this report will be a new element of the City's charges and fees
and will apply only to new development and redevelopment to lower to higher intensity
uses, in the East of 101 area. As indicated in the General Plan and amendments, new
improvements to the sewer infrastructure are required to ensure that the lack of
infrastructure capacity does not impede growth, as it did in the 1980's when sewage
capacity constrained development in the East of 101 Area. 1
South San Francisco General Plan, adopted October 13, 1999, page 202.
The purpose of the fee is to allow the City to collect from new development their fair
share of the cost of required sewer facility improvements. New development and
redeve'_opment to more intense uses will be charged the proposed Sewer Facility Impact
Fee in addition to the existing wastewater connection fee. The study area to be impacted
by this fee is as defined in the East of 101 Sewer System Master Plan and is bordered by
the San Francisco bay to the north and the east, the City of San Bruno and San Francisco
International Airport to the south, and Highway 101 to the west.
This report documents a reasonable relationship between new development and an impact
fee for funding the new development's fair share of sewer facility improvements in the
East of 101 area of the City. The impact fee is based the expected development in the
East of 101 area, the projected need for additional sewer capacity to serve that
development, the improvements that must be constructed to provide the required capacity,
and the costs of the improvements as determined by Carollo Engineers in their report; East
of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan. That report will be approved by the City
Counc'l prior to, and as a part of, implementation of the Sewer Facility Development
Impact Fee proposed here.
Mitigation Fee Act
The MStigation Fee Act in California Government Code Section 66000 et seq., establishes
requirements for setting and administering impact fees. The act requires local
governments to make the following findings when adopting an impact fee:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee;
2. Identify the use of fee revenues;
3. Determine a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development
paying the fee;
4. Determine a reasonable relationship between the need for the fee and the type of
develo-~ment paying the fee; and
2
5. Determine a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the
facility attributable to development paying the fee.
In general, the fee may not exceed the cost of the facilities needed to accommodate the
development paying the fee, and fee revenues can only be used to fund construction of the
identified improvements. The Government Code also specifies accounting and reporting
requirements for the use of fee revenues. The specific reporting requirements are
addressed separately in the Accounting for Impact Fees section.
This re-~ort addresses the requirements noted above in the following sections:
· The Purpose of the Study section identifies the purpose of the fee.
· The Costs Related to New Development section summarizes the capital
improvements required in the East of 101 area based on the projected growth of
development in the area as identified in the General Plan adopted October 13,
1999 and amendments, and the allocation of costs to future development. This
establishes a reasonable relationship between the use of fee revenues and the type
of development paying the fee by identifying the improvements to be funded by
the fee.
· The Capacity for New Development section establishes a reasonable relationship
between the need for the fee and the type of development paying the fee by
showing that existing sewer capacity is not sufficient to meet expected flows
from new development.
· The Determination of Impact Fee section establishes a reasonable relationship
between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities attributable to the
projected wastewater flows due to new development. Use ora flow-based
charge ensures that each development project pays its fair and proportionate
share of total facility costs.
This impact fee is developed in accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.,
which is attached as Appendix A.
Costs Related to New Development
The Ci~'s General Plan addresses the need for sewer infrastructure improvements.
Guiding Policy 5.3-G-4 states that the City should promote the orderly and efficient
operatiGn and expansion of the wastewater system to meet the projected needs upon
buildout. Additionally, Guiding Policy 5.3-G-5 states that the City should equitably
distribute the costs associated with providing wastewater service to new development.
Consistent with Implementing Policies 5.3-I~42 and 5.3-I-53, the City retained Carollo
Engineers to evaluate existing East of 101 collection system conditions and to identify the
improvements needed to serve increased development in the area. Their objectives, as
outlinec in the East of Highway lOI Sewer System Master Plan, were to:
· Establish sewer system design and planning criteria.
· Evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer collection system using computer
hydraulic modeling.
· Summarize existing system deficiencies and propose improvements to enhance
system reliability.
· Recommend improvements needed to service anticipated build out conditions.
· Develop a Capital Improvement Program with a planning horizon year of 2020.
· Comply with environmental clearances pertaining to the study area.
Based on the above objectives, the report identifies a $21.36 million capital improvement
program. Projects are listed on Table 1 and are numbered 1 through 20. The Master Plan
identifies projects required to upgrade existing capacity and those projects that are
required to serve new development in the East of 101 area. The Carollo report apportions
the cost of improvements according to the amount required to remedy existing deficiencies
2 Implementing Policy 5.3-14: "Ensure coordinated capital improvements with respect to the extent and
timing o:7 growth. The need for capital improvements to the wastewater system will necessarily be linked
to the ex2ent and timing of growth, if sufficient capacity is to be provided..."
3 Implerr.enting Policy 5.3-1-5: "Ensure that future residents and businesses equitably share costs
associated with providing wastewater service to new development in South San Francisco."
4
and the amount attributable to new development based on hydraulic modeling. The
hydraulic model was first run for existing system flows. After documenting results of this
analysis, future flows were input into the hydraulic model. The suggested capital
improvements were based on the results of total projected flows in the East of 101 study
area. The cost allocation for each project was then based on the proportional flow
distribution between the existing and future model simulation results. Although some
improvements are intended to cure existing deficiencies, specific improvements that serve
only new development are identified in the report. The recommended improvements to
service future development were based on flow projections created by the engineers using
a 2020 planning horizon and based on specific industry projections and calculated flows.
Per the Master Plan, industry wastewater flow projections were provided by several
industries in response to a survey by City staff Future development is projected to occur
as a result of both new development projects on currently vacant sites and redevelopment
from existing industrial/warehouse uses to the more intense Office/Research and
Develo-~ment (ORD) land use category. The primary land use category in the East of 101
area is projected to be ORD and will result in increased demand for sewer infrastructure
due to increased wastewater flows. Additional commercial development, including hotel
uses, is also expected to occur during General Plan buildout.
Based on the output of the hydraulic model and the recommended improvements to
service anticipated development, Carollo Engineers has identified $15.47 million as the
cost of improvements required to meet the demand of future development. As a result of
the construction of these projects, the sewer infrastructure will be expanded to meet the
projected needs of new development, allowing this development to proceed. The
remaining $5.89 million of projects provide benefit to existing customers in the area.
Table il
City o:'South San Francisco
East o~' Highway 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee
Capit~l Improvement Program - All East of 101 Projects*
User Benefit Share User Benefit Cost
Project Cost Existing Future Existing Future
Pump Stations
1 $387,000 100% 0% $387,000 $0
2 1,440,000 20% 80% 288,000 1,152,000
3 171,000 20% 80% 34,000 137,000
4 2,547,000 40% 60% 1,019,000 1,528,000
5 171,000 100% 0% 171,000 0
6 1,422,000 20% 80% 284,000 1,138,000
7 1,116,000 0% 100% 0 1,116,000
8 1,467,000 40% 60% 587,000 880,000
Total Pump Stations 8,721,000 32% 68% 2,770,000 5,951,000
Pipeline
9 259,000 0% 100% 0 259,000
10 2,933,000 0% 100% 0 2,933,000
11 852,000 0% 100% 0 852,000
12 1,294,000 20% 80% 259,000 1,035,000
13 1,978,000 50% 50% 989,000 989,000
14 1,711,000 40% 60% 684,000 1,027,000
15 311,000 0% 100% 0 311,000
16 1,650,000 0% 100% 0 1,650,000
17 310,000 70% 30% 217,000 93,000
18 462,000 20% 80% 92,000 370,000
19 524,000 100% 0% 524,000 0
20 354~000 100% 0% 354,000 0
Total ?ipeline 12,638,000 25% 75% 3,119,000 9,519,000
Total 21,359,000 28% 72% 5,889,000 15,470,000
*Prepared by BWA from Table 6.2 of East of Highway 101
Sewe_-' System Master Plan developed by Carollo Engineers.
As noted below, certain improvements benefit only one developer or development and are
therefore not included in the calculation of the impact fee. Improvements that provide
benefit to a specific development include projects 3, 7, 11, 15, and 16 as shown on Table
2. These projects are required to allow a specific development to proceed. The City has
6
discussed these improvement needs with the applicable property owners and the property
owners will either finance and build the projects on their own or reimburse the City for
projects constructed by the City. The City and developers will execute agreements to
provide for this arrangement.
Table 2
City of South San Francisco
East of Highway 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee
Development-Specific Projects*
User Benefit Share User Benefit Cost
Projec~. (1) Cost Existing Future Existing Future
3 $171,000 20% 80% $34,200 $137,000
7 1,116,000 0% 100% 0 1,116,000
11 852,000 0% 100% 0 852,000
15 311,000 0% 100% 0 311,000
16 1,650,000 0% 100% 0 1,650.000
Total 4,100,000 34,200 4,066,000
*Projects either built and finaced by developers or built by City and
reimbursed by developers.
All other improvements provide benefits generally to users connecting in the East of 101
area anc are required in order to ensure that the sewer infrastructure is sufficient to meet
the demands of new development. The projects include large trunk lines and pump
stations sized for the anticipated increase in flows that will come from new growth in the
area.
The description of facilities to be built and the methods used to determine the capacity
needed :?or anticipated development flows, as described in the Carollo plan, establishes a
reasonable relationship between the use of fee revenues and the new development paying
the fee.
Capacity for New Development
Flow data from the City indicate that average flows from the study area were about 2.5
cubic feet per second or 1.6 million gallons per day (mgd) in 2001. Carollo Engineers
calculated future flows in the area based on industry projections, existing water use, and
assumed wastewater generation of 400 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet for areas
slated for re-development to ORD. Trunk lines and pump stations were evaluated for
hydraulic capacity.
Table 3 shows the existing collection system capacity and the 2020 design capacity. The
difference is the capacity required for new development.
Table 3
City of South San Francisco
East of Highway 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee
Capacity Provided by Capital Improvement Program
Capacity
cfs (I)
Current Average Dry Weather Flow
2.5
mga (2)
1.6
2020 Average Dry Weather Flow
Capac'ty Required
Source: City records and Carollo Engineers
1 - cub"_c feet per second (cfs)
2 - mill'on gallons per day (mgd)
8.5 5.5
6.0 3.9
The existing collection system capacity is not sufficient to meet expected flows from new
develol:ment. Because additional capacity must be added to the existing infrastructure to
serve new development, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for the fee and
the new development that will pay the fee.
8
Determination of Impact Fee
Project costs and capacity shares are now used to determine the impact £ee as shown in
Table 4. Future developments share of the costs o£ master plan £acilities, plan preparation
and environmental review total $16.5 million. Costs allocated to specific developments
from Table 2 at $4.1 million are subtracted from this leaving a balance of $12.4 million.
The im,~act fee is then obtained by dividing this $12.4 million cost of new capacity by the
3.9 mgd of capacity added. The recommended sewer facility impact fee is thus calculated
as $3.19 per gallon per day of capacity required. This is equivalent to $478 for the flow
(150 gpd) from a single family dwelling unit. New development projects will be required
to pay 1.he Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee at the time a building permit is
obtained for the proposed project. The fee will be determined by the projected ultimate
capacity needs based the proposed use which will be determined by mutual agreement
between the City and the development.
9
Table 4
City of South San Francisco
East of Highway 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee
Sewer ?acility Impact Fee
Cost of CIP Facilities Allocable to Future Users (1)
East of 101 Master Plan Consultant Costs (2)
East of 101 Master Plan StaffCosts (2)
CEQA Xeview Allocable to Future Users (2)
Total
Less Ft*ture Portion of Development Specific Projects (3)
Total
Capacity Provided - mgd (4)
Cost of Capacity, S/gallon per day
Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (150 gpd)
$15,470,000
275,000
150,000
600,000
16,495,000
4~066,000
12,429,000
3.9
$3.19
$478
1 - From Table 1.
2 - As -)rovided by City.
3 - From Table 2.
4 - From Table 3.
This establishes a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of
the facility attributable to development flows paying the fee. Using a flow based charge
ensures that each development project pays its fair share of total facility costs. This
charge would be paid by development in the East of 101 area, and is in addition to the
City's existing sewer connection fees for treatment and disposal.
Adjusting Impact Fees
The im,act fee should be adjusted regularly to prevent the charges from falling behind the
costs of constructing new facilities. Several methods can be used to adjust the charge,
including:
10
· ENR Construction Cost Index: Engineering News Record (ENR) magazine publishes
cor_struction cost indices monthly for 20 major U.S. cities and an average of the same
20 cities around the U.S. This indice may be used to estimate the change in the
cor struction cost of wastewater facilities. For example, if the ENR Index has
increased by three percent since the last impact fee adjustment, the impact fee should
be increased by three percent.
· U.S., California, or regional consumer price index.
· Interest rate and borrowing costs: The interest and borrowing costs for debt issued to
finance water or sewer capital projects can be added to the connection charge
annaally.
We recommend that the City adjust its connection fees annually by the change in the ENR
Construction Cost Index for San Francisco. This is an appropriate index because it directly
reflects ~he City's costs of providing capacity for future customers.
The impact fee should also be reviewed when updated information, such as a revised
master plan or capital improvement program, is available but not less than every five years.
Note that the use of an index such as the ENR-CCI may result in the reduction of the fee if the
index declines.
Accounting for Impact Fees
The Government Code specifies the following procedures for the deposit, investment,
accounting, and expenditure of impact fees:
The City must deposit the charges in a separate fund or account and avoid
com_Tfingling them with its other moneys, except for investment purposes. Interest
earned on the fund accrues to the fund.
The City must make available to the public, within 180 days of the end of the fiscal
year, the following information:
11
· Description of charges deposited in the fund.
· Beginning and ending balance of fund and interest earned.
· Amount of charges collected within the fiscal year.
· Iderlification of the following:
· Each public improvement on which charges were spent and amount spent on each
:_mprovement, including percentage from connection charges if other funds were
also used.
· _Each public improvement on which charges were expended that was completed
within the year.
· Each public improvement that is expected to be undertaken in the following fiscal
year.
· Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the capital facilities fund,
including public improvements on which the transferred moneys are or will be
expended, date the loan will be repaid, and interest to be earned by capital facilities
fund.
· The Zity should comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of
Government Code 66000 et seq. For facilities to be funded with a combination of impact
fees and other revenues, the City must identify the source and amount of the other
revenues. The City must also identify when the other funds are anticipated to be available
to fuad the project.
· The City should update its Capital Improvement Plan (C~) on a regular basis to show the
programming of fee revenues to the sewer facilities. Use of the C~ in this manner
pro'c_des ongoing and up to date documentation of a reasonable relationship between new
development and the use of fee revenues.
· The City may alter the scope of the planned projects or substitute new projects, as long as
the p :oject list continues to represent improvements needed to accommodate new
deve opment in the East of 101 area. If the total cost of all planned projects net of non-fee
12
funding sources, ffany, varies from the total cost used as a basis for the fee, the City should
revise the fee accordingly.
The City can hold funds in a project account for planned improvements longer than five
years if necessary to collect sufficient funds to complete the project.
These requirements to maintain connection charges in a separate account and make annual
reports do not apply to money received pursuant to a development or reimbursement
agreeme at, charges used to pay debt service or collected under a bond indenture, or charges to
reimburse advances made under a prior reimbursement agreement.
13
APPENDIX A
Mitigation Fee Act
66000. As used in this chapter:
(a) "Development project" means any project undertaken for the
purpose of development. "Development project" includes a project
involving the issuance of a permit for construction or
reconstruction, but not a permit to operate.
(b) "Fee" means a monetary exaction other than a tax or special
assessment, whether established for a broad class of projects by
legislation of general applicability or imposed on a specific project
on an ad hoc basis, that is charged by a local agency to the
applicant in connection with approval of a development project for
the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public
facilities related to the development project, but does not include
fees specified in Section 66477, fees for processing applications for
governmental regulatory actions or approvals, fees collected under
develDpment agreements adopted pursuant to Article 2.5 (commencing
with Section 65864) of Chapter 4, or fees collected pursuant to
agreements with redevelopment agencies which provide for the
redevelopment of property in furtherance or for the benefit of a
redevelopment project for which a redevelopment plan has been adopted
pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with
Section 33000) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c) "Local agency" means a county, city, whether general law or
chartered, city and county, school district, special district,
authority, agency, any other municipal public corporation or
district, or other political subdivision of the state.
(d; "Public facilities" includes public improvements, public
services and community amenities.
66000.5. This chapter, Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 66010),
Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 66012), Chapter 8 (commencing with
Section 66016), and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 66020) shall
be known and may be cited as the Mitigation Fee Act.
66001. (a) In any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a
fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local
agency on or after January 1, 1989, the local agency shall do all of
the following:
(11 Identify the purpose of the fee.
(21 Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is
financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified.
That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a
capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may
be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may
be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities
for which the fee is charged.
(3) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the
fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is
imposed.
(4) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the
need for the public facility and the type of development project on
which the fee is imposed.
(b) In any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a
development project by a local agency on or after January 1, 1989,
the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable
relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public
facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
develcpment on which the fee is imposed.
(c) Upon receipt of a fee subject to this section, the local
agency shall deposit, invest, account for, and expend the fees
pursuant to Section 66006.
(d) For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the
account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the local agency
shall make all of the following findings with respect to that portion
of the account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncon~.itted:
(1) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the
purpose for which it is charged.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to
complete financing in incomplete improvements identified in paragraph
(2) of subdivision (a).
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred
to in paragraph (3) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate
account or fund.
When findings are required by this subdivision, they shall be made
in connection with the public information required by subdivision
(b) of Section 66006. The findings required by this subdivision need
only be made for moneys in possession of the local agency, and need
not be made with respect to letters of credit, bonds, or other
instruments taken to secure payment of the fee at a future date. If
the findings are not made as required by this subdivision, the local
agency shall refund the moneys in the account or fund as provided in
subdivision (e).
(e) Except as provided in subdivision (f), when sufficient funds
have been collected, as determined pursuant to subparagraph (F) of
paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 66006, to complete
financing on incomplete public improvements identified in paragraph
(2) of subdivision (a), and the public improvements remain
incomplete, the local agency shall identify, within 180 days of the
determination that sufficient funds have been collected, an
approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement
will be commenced, or shall refund to the then current record owner
or owners of the lots or units, as identified on the last equalized
assessment roll, of the development project or projects on a prorated
basis, the unexpended portion of the fee, and any interest accrued
thereon. By means consistent with the intent of this section, a
local agency may refund the unexpended revenues by direct payment, by
providing a temporary suspension of fees, or by any other reasonable
means. The determination by the governing body of the local agency
of the means by which those revenues are to be refunded is a
legislative act.
(f) If the administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues
pursuant to subdivision (e) exceed the amount to be refunded, the
local agency, after a public hearing, notice of which has been
published pursuant to Section 6061 and posted in three prominent
places within the area of the development project, may determine that
the revenues shall be allocated for some other purpose for which
fees are collected subject to this chapter and which serves the
projecc on which the fee was originally imposed.
66002. (a) Any local agency which levies a fee subject to Section
66001 may adopt a capital improvement plan, which shall indicate the
approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimates of
cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed with the fees.
(b) The capital improvement plan shall be adopted by, and shall be
annually updated ~y, a re~olution of the ~overnin~ b0dF of the local
agency adopted at a noticed public hearing. Notice of the hearing
shall be given pursuant to Section 65090. In addition, mailed notice
shall be given to any city or county which may be significantly
affected by the capital improvement plan. This notice shall be given
no later than the date the local agency notices the public hearing
pursuant to Section 65090. The information in the notice shall be
not less than the information contained in the notice of public
hearing and shall be given by first-class mail or personal delivery.
(c] "Facility" or "improvement," as used in this section, means
any of the following:
(1] Public buildings, including schools and related facilities;
provided that school facilities shall not be included if Senate Bill
97 of the 1987 -88 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective
on or before January 1, 1988.
(2 Facilities for the storage, treatment, and distribution of
nonagricultural water.
(3 Facilities for the collection, treatment, reclamation, and
disposal of sewage.
(4 Facilities for the collection and disposal of storm waters and
for flood control purposes.
(5~ Facilities for the generation of electricity and the
distribution of gas and electricity.
(6) Transportation and transit facilities, including but not
limited to streets and supporting improvements, roads, overpasses,
bridges, harbors, ports, airports, and related facilities. (7) Parks and recreation facilities.
(8) Any other capital project identified in the capital facilities
plan adopted pursuant to Section 66002.
66003. Sections 66001 and 66002 do not apply to a fee imposed
pursuant to a reimbursement agreement by and between a local agency
and a property owner or developer for that portion of the cost of a
public facility paid by the property owner or developer which exceeds
the need for the public facility attributable to and reasonably
related to the development. This chapter shall become operative on
January 1, 1989.
66004. The establishment or increase of any fee pursuant to this
chapter shall be subject to the requirements of Section 66018.
66005. (a) When a local agency imposes any fee or exaction as a
condition of approval of a proposed development, as defined by
Section 65927, or development project, those fees or exactions shall
not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service or
facility for which the fee or exaction is imposed.
(b) This section does not apply to fees or monetary exactions
expressly authorized to be imposed under Sections 66475.1 and 66477.
(c~ It is the intent of the Legislature in adding this section to
codify existing constitutional and decisional law with respect to the
imposition of development fees and monetary exactions on
developments by local agencies. This section is declaratory of
existlng law and shall not be construed or interpreted as creating
new law or as modifying or changing existing law.
66006. (a) If a local agency requires the payment of a fee
specified in subdivision (c) in connection with the approval of a
development project, the local agency receiving the fee shall deposit
it with the other fees for the improvement in a separate capital
facilities account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of
the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except
for temporary investments, and expend those fees solely for the
purpose for which the fee was collected. Any interest income earned
by moneys in the capital facilities account or fund shall also be
deposited in that account or fund and shall be expended only for the
purpose for which the fee was originally collected.
(b) (1) For each separate account or fund established pursuant to
subdivision (a), the local agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the
following information for the fiscal year:
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
(B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees
were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement
that was funded with fees.
(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the
construction of the public improvement will commence if the local
agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to
complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified
in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public
improvement remains incomplete.
(G) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the
accounz or fund, including the public improvement on which the
transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an
interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the
rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of
Section 66001 and any allocations pursuant to subdivision (f) of
Section 66001.
(2) The local agency shall review the information made available
to the public pursuant to paragraph (1) at the next regularly
scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information
is made available to the public, as required by this subdivision.
Notice of the time and place of the meeting, including the address
where chis information may be reviewed, shall be mailed, at least 15
days prior to the meeting, to any interested party who files a
written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the
meeting. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for
one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request
is filed. Renewal requests for mailed notices shall be filed on or
before April 1 of each year. The legislative body may establish a
reasonable annual charge for sending notices based on the estimated
cost of providing the service.
(c) For purposes of this section, "fee" means any fee imposed to
provide for an improvement to be constructed to serve a development
project, or which is a fee for public improvements within the meaning
of subdivision (b) of Section 66000, and that is imposed by the
local agency as a condition of approving the development project.
(d) Any person may request an audit of any local agency fee or
charge that is subject to Section 66023, including fees or charges of
school districts, in accordance with that section.
(e) The Legislature finds and declares that untimely or improper
allocation of development fees hinders economic growth and is,
therefore, a matter of statewide interest and concern. It is,
therefore, the intent of the Legislature that this section shall
supersede all conflicting local laws and shall apply in charter
cities.
(f) At the time the local agency imposes a fee for public
improvements on a specific development project, it shall identify the
public improvement that the fee will be used to finance.
66006.5. (a) A city or county which imposes an assessment, fee, or
charge, other than a tax, for transportation purposes may, by
ordinance, prescribe conditions and procedures allowing real property
which is needed by the city or county for local transportation
purposes, or by the state for transportation projects which will not
receive any federal funds, to be donated by the obligor in
satisfaction or partial satisfaction of the assessment, fee, or
charge.
(b) To facilitate the implementation of subdivision (a), the
Department of Transportation shall do all of the following:
(1) Give priority to the refinement, modification, and enhancement
of procedures and policies dealing with right-of-way donations in
order to encourage and facilitate those donations.
(2) Reduce or simplify paperwork requirements involving
right-of-way procurement.
(3] Increase communication and education efforts as a means to
solicLt and encourage voluntary right-of-way donations.
(4) Enhance communication and coordination with local public
entitles through agreements of understanding that address state
acceptance of right-of-way donations.
66007. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), any
local agency that imposes any fees or charges on a residential
development for the construction of public improvements or facilities
shall not require the payment of those fees or charges,
notwithstanding any other provision of law, until the date of the
final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued,
whichever occurs first. However, utility service fees may be
collected at the time an application for utility service is received.
If the residential development contains more than one dwelling, the
local agency may determine whether the fees or charges shall be paid
on a pro rata basis for each dwelling when it ~eceives its final
inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; on a
pro rata basis when a certain percentage of the dwellings have
received their final inspection or certificate of occupancy,
whichever occurs first; or on a lump-sum basis when the first
dwelling in the development receives its final inspection or
certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the local agency may require
the payment of those fees or charges at an earlier time if (1) the
local agency determines that the fees or charges will be collected
for public improvements or facilities for which an account has been
established and funds appropriated and for which the local agency has
adopted a proposed construction schedule or plan prior to final
inspection or issuance of the certificate of occupancy or (2) the
fees or charges are to reimburse the local agency for expenditures
previously made. "Appropriated," as used in this subdivision, means
authorization by the governing body of the local agency for which the
fee is collected to make expenditures and incur obligations for
specific purposes.
(c) (1) If any fee or charge specified in subdivision (a) is not
fully paid prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of
any portion of the residential development encumbered thereby, the
local agency issuing the building permit may require the property
owner, or lessee if the lessee's interest appears of record, as a
condision of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract
to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion thereof, within the
time specified in subdivision (a) . If the fee or charge is prorated
pursuant to subdivision (a), the obligation under the contract shall
be similarly prorated.
(21 The obligation to pay the fee or charge shall inure to the
benefzt of, and be enforceable by, the local agency that imposed the
fee or charge, regardless of whether it is a party to the contract.
The contract shall contain a legal description of the property
affected, shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder of
the county and, from the date of recordation, shall constitute a lien
for the payment of the fee or charge, which shall be enforceable
against successors in interest to the property owner or lessee at the
time of issuance of the building permit. The contract shall be
recorded in the grantor-grantee index in the name of the public
agency issuing the building permit as grantee and in the name of the
property owner or lessee as grantor. The local agency shall record a
release of the obligation, containing a legal description of the
property, in the event the obligation is paid in full, or a partial
release in the event the fee or charge is prorated pursuant to
subdivision (a).
(3) The contract may require the property owner or lessee to
provice appropriate notification of the opening of any escrow for the
sale of the property for which the building permit was issued and to
provice in the escrow instructions that the fee or charge be paid to
the local agency imposing the same from the sale proceeds in escrow
prior to disbursing proceeds to the seller.
(d) This section applies only to fees collected by a local agency
to fund the construction of public improvements or facilities. It
does not apply to fees collected to cover the cost of code
enforcement or inspection services, or to other fees collected to pay
for the cost of enforcement of local ordinances or state law.
(e) "Final inspection" or "certificate of occupancy," as used in
this section, have the same meaning as described in Sections 305 and
307 of the Uniform Building Code, International Conference of
Building Officials, 1985 edition.
(f) Methods of complying with the requirement in subdivision (b)
that a proposed construction schedule or plan be adopted, include,
but are not limited to, (1) the adoption of the capital improvement
plan described in Section 66002, or (2) the submittal of a five-year
plan for construction and rehabilitation of school facilities
pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 17017.5 of the Education Code.
66008. A local agency shall expend a fee for public improvements,
as accounted for pursuant to Section 66006, solely and exclusively
for the purpose or purposes, as identified in subdivision (f) of
Secticn 66006, for which the fee was collected. The fee shall not be
levied, collected, or imposed for general revenue purposes.
66010. As used in this chapter:
(a) "Development project" means a development project as defined
in Section 66000.
(b) "Fee" means a monetary exaction or a dedication, other than a
tax or special assessment, which is required by a local agency of the
applicant in connection with approval of a development project for
the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public
facilities related to the development project, but does not include
fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions
or approvals.
(c) "Local agency" means a local agency, as defined in Section
66000.
(d) "Public facilities" means public facilities, as defined in
Section 66000.
(e) "Reconstruction" means the reconstruction of the real
property, or portion thereof, where the property after reconstruction
is substantially equivalent to the property prior to damage or
destruction.
66010. As used in this chapter:
(al "Development project" means a development project as defined
in Section 66000.
(b) "Fee" means a monetary exaction or a dedication, other than a
tax or special assessment, which is required by a local agency of the
applicant in connection with approval of a development project for
the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public
facilLties related to the development project, but does not include
fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions
or approvals.
(c] "Local agency" means a local agency, as defined in Section
66000.
(d' "Public facilities" means public facilities, as defined in
Section 66000.
(e) "Reconstruction" means the reconstruction of the real
property, or portion thereof, where the property after reconstruction
is substantially equivalent to the property prior to damage or
destruction.
66011. No fee may be applied by a local agency to the
reconstruction of any residential, commercial, or industrial
development project that is damaged or destroyed as a result of a
natural disaster, as declared by the Governor. Any reconstruction of
real property, or portion thereof, which is not substantially
equivalent to the damaged or destroyed property, shall be deemed to
be new construction and only that portion which exceeds substantially
equivalent construction may be assessed a fee. The term
substantially equivalent, as used in this section, shall have the
same meaning as the term in subdivision (c) of Section 70 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code.
66012. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law which
prescribes an amount or otherwise limits the amount of a fee or
charge which may be levied by a city, county, or city and county, a
city, county, or city and county shall have the authority to levy any
fee or charge in connection with the operation of an aerial tramway
within its jurisdiction.
(bi If any person disputes whether a fee or charge levied
pursuant to subdivision (a) is reasonable, the auditor, or if there
is no auditor, the fiscal officer, of the city, county, or city and
county shall, upon request of the legislative body of the city,
county, or city and county, conduct a study and determine whether the
fee or charge is reasonable.
66013. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local
agency imposes fees for water connections or sewer connections, or
imposes capacity charges, those fees or charges shall not exceed the
estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee
or charge is imposed, unless a question regarding the amount of the
fee or charge imposed in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of
providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approved by,
a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue.
(bl As used in this section:
(11 "Sewer connection" means the connection of a structure or
project to a public sewer system.
(21 "Water connection" means the connection of a structure or
project to a public water system, as defined in subdivision (f) of
Section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code.
(31 "Capacity charge" means a charge for facilities in existence
at the time a charge is imposed or charges for new facilities to be
constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or
property being charged.
(41 "Local agency" means a local agency as defined in Section
66000.
(5) "Fee" means a fee for the physical facilities necessary to
make a water connection or sewer connection, including, but not
limited to, meters, meter boxes, and pipelines from the structure or
project to a water distribution line or sewer main, and that does not
exceec the estimated reasonable cost of labor and materials for
installation of those facilities.
(c) A local agency receiving payment of a charge as specified in
paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) shall deposit it in a separate
capital facilities fund with other charges received, and account for
the charges in a manner to avoid any commingling with other moneys of
the local agency, except for investments, and shall expend those
charges solely for the purposes for which the charges were collected.
Any interest income earned from the investment of moneys in the
capital facilities fund shall be deposited in that fund.
(d) For a fund established pursuant to subdivision (c), a local
agency shall make available to the public, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, the following information for that
fiscal year:
(11 A description of the charges deposited in the fund.
(2] The beginning and ending balance of the fund and the interest
earned from investment of moneys in the fund.
(31 The amount of charges collected in that fiscal year.
(41 An identification of all of the following:
(Al Each public improvement on which charges were expended and the
amounz of the expenditure for each improvement, including the
percentage of the total cost of the public improvement that was
funded with those charges if more than one source of funding was
used.
(B) Each public improvement on which charges were expended that
was completed during that fiscal year.
(C) Each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken
in the following fiscal year.
(5) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the
capital facilities fund. The information provided, in the case of
an interfund transfer, shall identify the public improvements on
which the transferred moneys are, or will be, expended. The
information, in the case of an interfund loan, shall include the date
on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the
fund will receive on the loan.
(e) The information required pursuant to subdivision (d) may be
included in the local agency's annual financial report.
(f) The provisions of subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not apply to
any of the following:
(1) Moneys received to construct public facilities pursuant to a
contract between a local agency and a person or entity, including,
but not limited to, a reimbursement agreement pursuant to Section
66003.
(2) Charges that are used to pay existing debt service or which
are subject to a contract with a trustee for bondholders that
requires a different accounting of the charges, or charges that are
used to reimburse the local agency or to reimburse a person or entity
who advanced funds under a reimbursement agreement or contract for
facilities in existence at the time the charges are collected. (3) Charges collected on or before December 31, 1998.
(~) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the ordinance, resolution, or motion imposing a
fee or capacity charge subject to this section shall be brought
pursuant to Section 66022.
(h) Fees and charges subject to this section are not subject to
the provisions of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000), but are
subject to the provisions of Sections 66016, 66022, and 66023.
(iD The provisions of subdivisions (cD and (d) shall only apply to
capacity charges levied pursuant to this section.
66014. (aD Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local
agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use
permits; building inspections; building permits; filing and
processing applications and petitions filed with the local agency
formazion commission or conducting preliminary proceedings or
proceedings under the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985, Division 3 (commencing with Section 56000) of Title 5;
the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map
Act, ]Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7; or
planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (commencing with
Section 65100) of Division 1 of Title 7 or under any other authority;
those fees shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of
providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question
regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated
reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted
to, and approved by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors
voting on the issue.
(bi Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the ordinance, resolution, or motion
authorizing the charge of a fee subject to this section shall be
brought pursuant to Section 66022.
66016. (aD Prior to levying a new fee or service charge, or prior
to approving an increase in an existing fee or service charge, a
local agency shall hold at least one open and public meeting, at
which oral or written presentations can be made, as part of a
regularly scheduled meeting. Notice of the time and place of the
meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be
consicered, and a statement that the data required by this section is
available, shall be mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to
any interested party who files a written request with the local
agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or
service charges. Any written request for mailed notices shall be
valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a
renewal request is filed. Renewal requests for mailed notices shall
be filed on or before April 1 of each year. The legislative body may
establish a reasonable annual charge for sending notices based on
the estimated cost of providing the service. At least 10 days prior
to the meeting, the local agency shall make available to the public
data indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to
provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied and
the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including
General Fund revenues. Unless there has been voter approval, as
prescribed by Section 66013 or 66014, no local agency shall levy a
new fee or service charge or increase an existing fee or service
charge to an amount which exceeds the estimated amount required to
provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied.
If, however, the fees or service charges create revenues in excess of
actua2 cost, those revenues shall be used to reduce the fee or
service charge creating the excess.
(b Any action by a local agency to levy a new fee or service
charge or to approve an increase in an existing fee or service charge
shall be taken only by ordinance or resolution. The legislative
body of a local agency shall not delegate the authority to adopt a
new fee or service charge, or to increase a fee or service charge.
(cl Any costs incurred by a local agency in conducting the meeting
or meetings required pursuant to subdivision (a) may be recovered
from fees charged for the services which were the subject of the
meeting.
(d) This section shall apply only to fees and charges as described
in Sections 51287, 56383, 57004, 65104, 65456, 65863.7, 65909.5,
66013, 66014, and 66451.2 of this code, Sections 17951, 19132.3, and
19852 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 41901 of the Public
Resources Code, and Section 21671.5 of the Public Utilities Code.
(e) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the ordinance, resolution, or motion levying a
fee or service charge subject to this section shall be brought
pursuant to Section 66022.
66017. (a) Any action adopting a fee or charge, or increasing a fee
or charge adopted, upon a development project, as defined in Section
66000, which applies to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving,
or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use shall be
enacted in accordance with the notice and public hearing procedures
specified in Section 54986 or 66016 and shall be effective no sooner
that 60 days following the final action on the adoption of the fee or
charge or increase in the fee or charge.
(b) Without following the procedure otherwise required for the
adoption of a fee or charge, or increasing a fee or charge, the
legislative body of a local agency may adopt an urgency measure as an
interim authorization for a fee or charge, or increase in a fee or
charge, to protect the public health, welfare and safety. The
interim authorization shall require four-fifths vote of the
legislative body for adoption. The interim authorization shall have
no force or effect 30 days after its adoption. The interim authority
shall contain findings describing the current and immediate threat
to the public health, welfare and safety. After notice and public
hearing pursuant to Section 54986 or 66016, the legislative body may
extend the interim authority for an additional 30 days. Not more
than two extensions may be granted. Any extension shall also require
a four-fifths vote of the legislative body.
66018. (a) Prior to adopting an ordinance, resolution, or other
legislative enactment adopting a new fee or approving an increase in
an existing fee to which this section applies, a local agency shall
hold a public hearing, at which oral or written presentations can be
made, as part of a regularly scheduled meeting. Notice of the time
and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the
matter to be considered, shall be published in accordance with
Section 6062a.
(b) Amy costs incurred by a local agency in conducting the
hearing required pursuant to subdivision (a) may be recovered as part
of the fees which were the subject of the hearing.
(c) This section applies only to the adopting or increasing of
fees to which a specific statutory notice requirement, other than
Section 54954.2, does not apply.
(d) As used in this section, "fees" do not include rates or
charges for water, sewer, or electrical service.
66018.5. "Local agency," as used in this chapter, has the same
meaning as provided in Section 66000.
66020. (a) Amy party may protest the imposition of any fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on a
development project, as defined in Section 66000, by a local agency
by meeting both of the following requirements:
(1) Tendering any required payment in full or providing
satisfactory evidence of arrangements to pay the fee when due or
ensure performance of the conditions necessary to meet the
requirements of the imposition.
(2) Serving written notice on the governing body of the entity,
which notice shall contain all of the following information:
(A) A statement that the required payment is tendered or will be
tendered when due, or that any conditions which have been imposed are
provided for or satisfied, under protest.
(B) A statement informing the governing body of the factual
elements of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis for
the protest.
(b~ Compliance by any party with subdivision (a) shall not be the
basis for a local agency to withhold approval of any map, plan,
permis, zone change, license, or other form of permission, or
concurrence, whether discretionary, ministerial, or otherwise,
incident to, or necessary for, the development project. This section
does not limit the ability of a local agency to ensure compliance
with all applicable provisions of law in determining whether or not
to approve or disapprove a development project.
(c' Where a reviewing local agency makes proper and valid findings
that che construction of certain public improvements or facilities,
the need for which is directly attributable to the proposed
development, is required for reasons related to the public health,
safety, and welfare, and elects to impose a requirement for
construction of those improvements or facilities as a condition of
approval of the proposed development, then in the event a protest is
lodged pursuant to this section, that approval shall be suspended
pending withdrawal of the protest, the expiration of the limitation
period of subdivision (d) without the filing of an action, or
resolution of any action filed. This subdivision confers no new or
independent authority for imposing fees, dedications, reservations,
or other exactions not presently governed by other law.
(dl (1) A protest filed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be filed
at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development
or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions to be imposed on a
development project. Each local agency shall provide to the project
applicant a notice in writing at the time of the approval of the
project or at the time of the imposition of the fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions, a statement of the amount of the
fees or a description of the dedications, reservations, or other
exactions, and notification that the 90-day approval period in which
the applicant may protest has begun.
(2) Any party who files a protest pursuant to subdivision (a) may
file an action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the
imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions
imposed on a development project by a local agency within 180 days
after the delivery of the notice. Thereafter, notwithstanding any
other law to the contrary, all persons are barred from any action or
proceeding or any defense of invalidity or unreasonableness of the
imposition. Any proceeding brought pursuant to this subdivision
shall take precedence over all matters of the calendar of the court
except criminal, probate, eminent domain, forcible entry, and
unlawful detainer proceedings.
(e) If the court finds in favor of the plaintiff in any action or
proceeding brought pursuant to subdivision (d), the court shall
direct the local agency to refund the unlawful portion of the
payment, with interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum, or return
the unlawful portion of the exaction imposed.
(f) (1) If the court grants a judgment to a plaintiff
invalidating, as enacted, all or a portion of an ordinance or
resolution enacting a fee, dedication, reservation, or other
exaction, the court shall direct the local agency to refund the
unlawful portion of the payment, plus interest at an annual rate
equal to the average rate accrued by the Pooled Money Investment
Account during the time elapsed since the payment occurred, or to
return the unlawful portion of the exaction imposed.
(2) If an action is filed within 120 days of the date at which an
ordinance or resolution to establish or modify a fee, dedication,
reservation, or other exactions to be imposed on a development
project takes effect, the portion of the payment or exaction
invalidated shall also be returned to any other person who, under
protest pursuant to this section and under that invalid portion of
that same ordinance or resolution as enacted, tendered the payment or
provided for or satisfied the exaction during the period from 90
days prior to the date of the filing of the action which invalidates
the payment or exaction to the date of the entry of the judgment
referenced in paragraph (1).
(g) Approval or conditional approval of a development occurs, for
the purposes of this section, when the tentative map, tentative
parcel map, or parcel map is approved or conditionally approved or
when the parcel map is recorded if a tentative map or tentative
parcel map is not required.
(h) The imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other
exactions occurs, for the purposes of this section, when they are
imposed or levied on a specific development.
66021. (a) Any party on whom a fee, tax, assessment, dedication,
reservation, or other exaction has been imposed, the payment or
performance of which is required to obtain governmental approval of a
development, as defined by Section 65927, or development project,
may protest the establishment or imposition of the fee, tax,
assessment, dedication, reservation, or other exaction as provided in
Section 66020.
(b) The protest procedures of subdivision (a) do not apply to the
protest of any tax or assessment (1) levied pursuant to a principal
act that contains protest procedures, or (2) that is pledged to
secure payment of the principal of, or interest on, bonds or other
public indebtedness.
66022. (a) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review,
set aside, void, or annul an ordinance, resolution, or motion
adopting a new fee or service charge, or modifying or amending an
existing fee or service charge, adopted by a local agency, as defined
in Section 66000, shall be commenced within 120 days of the
effective date of the ordinance, resolution, or motion.
If an ordinance, resolution, or motion provides for an automatic
adjustment in a fee or service charge, and the automatic adjustment
results in an increase in the amount of a fee or service charge, any
action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the
increase shall be commenced within 120 days of the effective date of
the increase.
(b) Any action by a local agency or interested person under this
sectiDn shall be brought pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with
Section 860) of Title 10 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(c) This section shall apply only to fees, capacity charges, and
service charges described in and subject to Sections 66013 and 66014.
66023. (a) Any person may request an audit in order to determine
whether any fee or charge levied by a local agency exceeds the
amounu reasonably necessary to cover the cost of any product or
service provided by the local agency. If a person makes that
request, the legislative body of the local agency may retain an
independent auditor to conduct an audit to determine whether the fee
or charge is reasonable.
(bl Any costs incurred by a local agency in having an audit
conducted by an independent auditor pursuant to subdivision (a) may
be recovered from the person who requests the audit.
(c) Any audit conducted by an independent auditor to determine
whether a fee or charge levied by a local agency exceeds the amount
reasonably necessary to cover the cost of providing the product or
service shall conform to generally accepted auditing standards.
(d) The procedures specified in this section shall be alternative
and in addition to those specified in Section 54985.
(e) The Legislature finds and declares that oversight of local
agency fees is a matter of statewide interest and concern. It is,
therefore, the intent of the Legislature that this chapter shall
supersede all conflicting local laws and shall apply in charter
cities.
(f) This section shall not be construed as granting any additional
authority to any local agency to levy any fee or charge which is not
otherwise authorized by another provision of law, nor shall its
provisions be construed as granting authority to any local agency to
levy a new fee or charge when other provisions of law specifically
prohibit the levy of a fee or charge.
66024. (a) In any judicial action or proceeding to validate,
attack, review, set aside, void, or annul any ordinance or resolution
providing for the imposition of a development fee by any city,
county, or district in which there is at issue whether the
development fee is a special tax within the meaning of Section 50076,
the city, county, or district has the burden of producing evidence
to establish that the development fee does not exceed the cost of the
service, facility, or regulatory activity for which it is imposed.
(b) No party may initiate any action or proceeding pursuant to
subdivision (a) unless both of the following requirements are met:
(1) The development fee was directly imposed on the party as a
condition of project approval.
(2) At least 30 days prior to initiating the action or proceeding,
the party requests the city, county, or district to provide a copy
of the documents which establish that the development fee does not
exceed the cost of the service, facility, or regulatory activity for
which it is imposed. In accordance with Section 6257, the city,
county, or district may charge a fee for copying the documents
requested pursuant to this paragraph.
(c) For purposes of this section, costs shall be determined in
accordance with fundamental fairness and consistency of method as to
the allocation of costs, expenses, revenues, and other items included
in the calculation.
66025. "Local agency," as used in this chapter, means a local
agency as defined in Section 66000.
APPENDIX B
Carollo Engineers - Projects, Costs, and Allocations
Table 6.2 Capital Improvement Program
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Imlxmmmem Project Name
Number Prlorll~Jll ~
Priority
PUMP STATIONS
I 3 Pump Station No. 1
PS t -3
2 I Pump Statlo~ NO. 2
PS2-1
3 2 Pump StaUon No. 3
PS3-2
4 1 Pump Station No. 4
P~-I
5 3 PU~ Stallon NO. 6
PS6.3
6 3 Pump Station NO. 7
PS7-3
7 1 Pump Station NO. 8
PS8-1
8 2 Pump Station NO. 10
PSt0-2
PIPELINES (PRESSURE AND GRAVITY)
9 3 Force Main-Pump Station No. 2
FMPS2-3 Pine
10 3 Force Main-Pump Station H~. 4
FMPS4-3 Pipe
FMPS4.3 Bo~e & JactdCos~ng
FMPS4-3 I~pe and tie~n
11 1 Force Mall~.P~p Station NO. 8 FMPSS-1 Pipe
12 3 Oystor Palm Trunk
OP-3 Pipe
OP-3 Pipe
OP-3 Pipe
13 3 ~Jta~lon Trun~
AL-3 pq~e
AL-3 Bo~e & Jack CaSing
14 2 East Grand Trunk
EG-2 Pipe
EG-2 Pipe
EG-2 Pipe
15 2 DNA Way Su~trunk
OW-2 Pipe
DW -2 Pipe
16 2 Swift SuMrunk
SW-2 Pipe
17 3 Lltttatield Nerlh Subtrunk
LIN-3 Pipe
16 3 Llfttafleld SoutM Subtrtmk
LIS*3 Pipe
LIS-3 pine
19 3 Executive Subtrunk
EX-3 P~pe
20 2 Hert~r Way Subtr~nk
HW-2 Pipe
Iml~'ovemenl Name/Type Street
Project Limits
Pump Station Upgradem Oyster Pmnl Bird Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Uogradem Gateway Bird Existing Pump Statm~l Structure
Pump Station Upgradera Kimball Way ExisPng Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgrade~z) Herbo~ Way Existing Pump Station Slrttctui'e
Pump Station Upgrade(~ Utah Ave Ex~sting Pump Statiael Structure
Pump Station Upgradere Littlefield Ave Ex,sPrig Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgraderzl 701 Fort3es Blvd Existing Pump Station Structure
Pu~p Station Upgradela 572 Forbes Bird Exislmg Pump Station Structu~'a
Gateway Bird P S. 2 to 835' s/o P.S 10 835
SPRR Alignment PS. 4 to WOCP 21 2815
SPRR Alignment Crossing Nav~jable Slough 21 200
WOCP PropertyFM on WQCP ~roperty and tie in 21 750
Fo~bas 81vd PS. $ to Allerto~ Ave 10 2750
Eccles Avenue240' sip Oyster Point Bird to 640' ~/o Eccles 8 880
O~ter Point Bird 640' w/o Eccles to Getaway Blvd 10/12 1615
Gateway Bird Oyster Point Bird Io Pump Statmn No. 2 12 t 55
Allerton Ave/East C Forbes 81vd to Litftelieid Ava ! 5 2825
Allerton Ave Crossing Raiflrosd 15 t O0
East Grand Ave AJledon Ava to Littlelm{d Ave 15 330
East Grand Ava Littfefielcl Ave to 150' e/o Rcet3~ing A~e 15 1 ! 90
East Grand Ave 150' e/o Roebting Ave to Harbo~ Way18 740
DNA Way 530' n/o Grandvisw Ave to SPRR Alignment 8 215
F~-bes 81vd 300' w/o DNA Way to 90' e/o Kaufmann Cl 10 565
Swift Ave 290. s/o East G~ancl (at RR Spur) to PS 3 15 3195
Lifttefield Ave e/o SPTCo TO 190' e/o Lawrence Ave 8 10OO
Littlefield Ave Utah Ave to 550' s/o Utah Ave 8
Littleliald Ave 550' s/o Utah Ave to SPTCo. Al~'lrnent 10
Executwe D~ive East G~and to 1015' ne/o East Grand18
Harbor Way Utah Ave to 80' ~Jo Milchell Ave
t ConstrucliO~ Priority 1 = Shofl-Term IrnDfovament
2 = Intarmed~ata. Term Iml~ovement.
4 ENR = 7.400
H ~.Chent~.SoSFO_ FNO~.6399 AOO~.COS IS ~CI p. 090902
PROPOSED PROJECTS PROJECT COSTS
ExistingExistingExisting Proposed ProposedProposed
ExistingExisting Firm Total Pump~Plpe Pro~oced ParallelFirm Total Pumps,q:qpe Unit Baseline Estimated Total
SIz~ Length CapecifyCatiaclty Peek Flows Slza
~ ~cf~ ~CI~ Peak FI~s ~st Coil Cons~fl~ Cos/
(In) (~) (gpm) (~) (m~) (~) Re~a~ ~) (gpm) (m~) ($) ~) ($) ($)
~ ~ 3x3~ Re~Ke ~ 9~ 3x3~
1000 2000 2x1000
Replace 2400 3400 lxtO00. 2x1200
1500 2250 3x750
Replace 1500 2250 3x750
Replace 9000 12000 4x3000
200 400 2x200
Replace 200 400 2x200
300 600 2x300
Ref~ace 800 1600 2x800
Re~ece 1400 2100 3x700
Replace 750 1500 2x750
990 1980 2x990
500 1000 2x500
0.65
5.54
10 Paregel
21 Parallel
36(21) Parallel
21
1289
151
039
049
0.65
2.26
10 Peral~l
12 Replace
15 Replace
18 Replace
18 Replace
32(16) Re,ace
1.84
308
3 28
4.17
0.78
305
313
097
1.0~
0 43
0.19
21 Replace
24 Replace
27 Replace
10 Replace
12 Replace
15 Replace
8 Replace
184
6 70
6.85
1.54
079
550
8O5
10t5
980
012
018
022
043
Replace
Replace
Replace
Replace
0~2
0 95
022
043
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDED FINANCING
Shah Interme~ata Long Future
Project Term Teem Term Users
Total Im~ovementa Improv~:lnents Improl~lmer'lt s Benefit
(S) (S) ($) tS)
198.462 258.000 387.000
Pro~ect Total
738.462 960.000 1.440.000
Pfo~e~t Total 1.440.000 1.440.000 85%
87.692 114.000 171.000
Project Total 17t.000 171,000 80%
1.306.154 1.696.000 2.547.000
F~'aJs~ Total 2.547.000 2.~.4 7.O00 60%
87.692 114.000 171.000
Pro~ect Total 171,000 171.000 0%
729.231 948,000 1,422.000
Project Total 1.422.000 1.422.000 80%
572.30~ 744.000 1.116.000
Project Total 1.116.000 1.11 6.000 100%
752.308 978.000 1.467.000
Project Total 1 467.000 1.467.000 60%
150 132,821 172.667 259.000
Project Total
300 894,872 1.163.333 1.745.0OO
1,7SO 370.769 482.000 723.000
300 236,462 310.000 465,000
Pro, act Total
150 436.923 568.000 852.000
Project Total
200 186.657 242.667 364,000
250 427.692 556.000 834.000
300 49.231 64,000 96,000
Project Total
259.000
Future ExlsUflg
Cost Cnet
(s) (~
0 387,000
1,224,000 216,000
1 36.800 34.200
1.528.200 1.018.800
0 171.000
1.137.600 284.400
1.1 16.000 0
880.200 586.800
259.000 100% 259.000 0
2.633.000 2.933.000 100%
852.000 852.000 100%
1.294.000
1.978.000
1.294.000 80%
300 897.949 1,167.333 1,751,000
1.100 116,410 151.333 227,000
Project Total
350 122.564 159,333 239.000
350 441,026 573.333 860,00(3
400 313.846 408.000 612.000
Project Total
175 40,000 52.000 78,000
200 119.487 155.333 233.000
Project Total
250 846.154 1.100.000 1.650.000
Project Total
150 158.974 206,667 310.000
Project Total
150 87,592 114.000 171,000
175 149,231 194,000 291.0OO
Pro,ct
250 268,718 349,333 524.000
Pro~ac~ Total
175 181.538 236000 354.0OO
Pro, ct Total
1.978.0OO 50%
1,711,000 1,711.000 60%
311.000 311,000 100%
98%
1,650,000 1,650,000
310,000 310,000 30%
2.933.000 0
852.000 0
462.000 462.000 80%
524.000 524.000 0%
354.000 354.000 0%
5.664.000 9.740.OO0
Total Cost 21.359.000 $,955.000
1.035.200 258.800
989,000 989.000
1.026.600 684.d00
311.000 0
1.617.000 33.000
93,000 217.000
369.600 92.400
0 524.000
0 354.000
15.508.200 5,850,800
ATTACHMENT 1
1. Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee for Future Development within the East of 101
Area
2. Deft aitions.
(a) "Applicant" shall mean any person or legal entity that applies for a permit or other
entitlement for a new development project.
(b) "City" shall mean the City of South San Francisco.
(c) "Development" shall mean the construction, alteration, or addition, other than by the City, of
any buiTding or structure within the area within the East of 101 area of the City of South San
Francisco.
(d) "Development Project" means any Commercial, Office/Research and Development,
Industrial or Hotel Development Project.
(e) "East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee" or "Fee" shall mean the charge or
charges imposed on development to fund the sewer improvements to ensure that such
development pays its fair share of improvements generated by such development pursuant to
this resolution and applicable law.
(f) "East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan" shall mean the "East of Highway 101
Sewer System Master Plan," September 2001 draft, prepared by Carollo Engineers for the
City of South San Francisco.
(g) "Hotel" shall mean a commercial facility containing guestrooms for the temporary use of
transients where access to individual units is predominantly by means of common interior or
exterior hallways.
(h) "Industrial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land having a
General ?lan land use or zoning designation for the manufacture, production, assembly, or
processing of consumer goods and/or other space uses incidental to these activities.
Industrial land uses include but are not limited to: assembly; concrete and asphalt batching
plants; contractors' storage yards; fabrication; lumber yards; manufacturing; outdoor
stockyards and service yards; printing; processing; warehouse and distribution; and
wholesale and heavy commercial uses. "Industrial" includes the following General Plan
land use designations: light industry and heavy industry.
(i) "Land Use Category" shall mean any of the specific land uses that have been listed in this
Resolution and are used to provide the basis for future sewer capacity projections.
ATTACHIV~NT 1
1. Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee for Future Development within the East of 101
Area
2. Definitions.
(a) "Applicant" shall mean any person or legal entity that applies for a permit or other
entitlement for a new development project.
(b) "City" shall mean the City of South San Francisco.
(c)
"Development" shall mean the construction, alteration, or addition, other than by the City, of
any bu[ ding or structure within the area within the East of 101 area of the City of South San
Francisco.
(d) "Development Project" means any Commercial, Office/Research and Development,
Industrial or Hotel Development Project.
(e)
"East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee" or "Fee" shall mean the charge or
charges imposed on development to fund the sewer improvements to ensure that such
develop'nent pays its fair share of improvements generated by such development pursuant to
this resolution and applicable law.
(f)
"East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan" shall mean the "East of Highway 101
Sewer System Master Plan," September 2001 draft, prepared by Carollo Engineers for the
City of South San Francisco.
(g)
"Hotel" shall mean a commercial facility containing guestrooms for the temporary use of
transien :s where access to individual units is predominantly by means of common interior or
exterior hallways.
(h)
"Industrial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land having a
General Plan land use or zoning designation for the manufacture, production, assembly, or
processing of consumer goods and/or other space uses incidental to these activities.
Industrial land uses include but are not limited to: assembly; concrete and asphalt batching
plants; contractors' storage yards; fabrication; lumber yards; manufacturing; outdoor
stockyards and service yards; printing; processing; warehouse and distribution; and
wholesa e and heavy commercial uses. "Industrial" includes the following General Plan
land use designations: light industry and heavy industry.
(i) "Land Use Category" shall mean any of the specific land uses that have been listed in this
Resolution and are used to provide the basis for future sewer capacity projections.
(J)
"New Development Project" shall mean any construction, addition, alteration or other
change of use of a building or land that requires the City to issue a grading, building,
plumbing, mechanical, or electrical permit, or any other form of entitlement.
(k)
Office/Research and Development" shall mean any development constructed or to be
constructed on land having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for general
business offices, medical or professional offices, administrative or headquarters offices,
offices :'or large wholesaling or manufacturing operations, research and/or development,
researcr and development campus development with ancillary retail and services, and other
space uses incidental to these activities. Office land uses include, but are not limited to:
administrative headquarters; business parks; finance offices; insurance offices; legal offices;
medical and health services offices and office buildings; professional and administrative
offices; professional associations; real estate offices; research and/or development offices
and travel agencies.
(1) "Public Works Director" shall mean the Director of Public Works or the Director's designee.
(m)"Report" shall mean the information contained in the Sewer Facility Fee Study and the East
of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan as that plan is referenced by the Sewer Facility
Fee Study.
(n)
"Sewer Facility Fee Study" shall mean the report entitled "East of 101 Sewer Facility
Development Impact Fee," October 2002 draft, prepared by Bartle Wells for the City of
South San Francisco.
(o)
"Sewer Improvements" shall include those improvements that are described in Exhibit A;
provided that the City Council later determines in accordance with applicable law (1) that
there is a reasonable relationship between development within the East of 101 Area and the
need for alternative sewer improvements, (2) that the alternative sewer improvements are
comparable to the facilities listed in Exhibit A, and (3) that revenue from fees charged
pursuan: to this resolution will be used only to pay new development's fair and
proporti>nate share of the alternative sewer improvements.
3. Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee Imposed.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq, ("Mitigation Fee Act") a Fee
shall be imposed and paid at the times and in the amounts and otherwise apply and be
administerec as prescribed in this resolution for each non-residential new development
(including commercial, hotel, and office/research and development (R&D)).
7
4. Time for Fee Payment.
A Fee shall be charged and paid for each non-residential development, including
commercial, hotel, and office/research and development developments, upon issuance of the
building permit, or if no building permit is required, upon approval of a use permit for the
development project or, if no use permit or amendment thereto is required, at the earliest of any
other permit required for the project, for such non-residential development.
5. Amount and Calculation of Fee.
The Fee is $3.19 per gallon per day of sewer capacity required. The impact fee
was obtainecl by dividing the $12.4 million dollar cost of new capacity by the 3.9 million gallons
per day of capacity required to meet the demands of future development.
a. The total fee will be determined by calculating the projected capacity
needs based upon the estimated flow/discharge which shall be based on historical industry data,
data supplied by the developer indicating previous capacity needs (if applicable) and data from
similar developments with similar proposed uses. The Director of Public Works, in consultation
with the developer, shall determine the amount of capacity required by mutual agreement.
b. For redevelopment projects, i.e. those projects converting from Industrial
to Office/R&D, the amount of the fee shall be calculated as set forth in (a) for the new
development. The City shall then credit the developer an amount equal to the average capacity
used over the previous 12 months, or if the existing use was established less than 12 months prior
to redevelopment, the average capacity required during the preceding period.
6. Exemptions From Fee. The Fee shall not be imposed on the following:
a. Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure
that has beer destroyed or demolished; provided that, the building permit for reconstruction is
obtained witfin one year after the building was destroyed or demolished, unless the replacement
or reconstruction increase the square footage of the structure by 50 percent or more.
b. Any project that has submitted a complete application for a vesting
tentative map, has an executed Development Agreement or has received its final discretionary
approval and begun construction as of the Effective Date of this Resolution.
7. Use of Fee Revenue.
The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in a separate, interest
bearing account to permit accounting for such revenues and the interest that they generate. Such
revenues anc interest shall be used only for the facilities and the purposes for which the Fee was
collected, which are the following:
8
a. To pay for design, engineering, construction of and property acquisition
for, and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related to, the Sewer Improvements;
b. To reimburse the City for the Sewer Improvements constructed by the
City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless such funds
were obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for the Improvements.
c. To reimburse developers that have designed and constructed any of the
Improvemerts with prior City approval and have entered into an agreement, as provided in
Section 12, below; and
d. To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing
administration of the Fee program, including, but not limited to, the cost of studies, legal costs,
and other costs of updating the Fee.
8. Standards.
The Standards upon which the need for the Facilities are based are the standards of the
City, including the standards contained in the General Plan and those City standards reflected in
the Report.
9. Periodic Review.
a. During each fiscal year, the Public Works Director shall prepare a report
for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, identifying the balance of
Fee revenues in the Fee account.
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also
review, as p~rt of any adopted City Capital Improvement Plan each year, the approximate
location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all Facilities to be financed with the
Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation.
The City Comcil shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee revenue
balances are to be put and demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the
purpose for which it is charged.
10. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Fee.
The Fee set forth herein is adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on
the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analysis to
determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City
Council may review the Fee to determine that the Fee amounts are reasonably related to the
impact of Development within the City. In addition to the inflation adjustments pursuant to
Section 12, below, the City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and
conclusions of further studies and any standards in the General Plan, as from time to time
amended by :he City.
...... 11. Fee Adjustments.
The purpose of this section is to provide for annual adjustments of the Fee for inflation,
beginning July 1, 2003 and each July thereafter, as follows:
a. Construction Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the
cost of construction of the Facilities, as shown in the Report, increasing/decreasing such
construction cost by the annual percentage increase/decrease reached by comparing the
Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the prior March or
April over tl'.e same Construction Cost Index for the same month for the prior year. The City
Manager may round the adjusted Facilities construction cost to whole dollars.
b. Land Acquisition Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust
the cost of acquiring real property interests for the Facilities as shown in the Report by
calculating the percentage change in land cost per acre within the city, based on a comparison of
the most recent appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting the Fee) and the
immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting the Fee and
using the same methodology) (the "Land Index"). The City Manager may round the adjusted
Facilities lard acquisition cost to whole dollars.
c. Total Annual Fee Adjustment. Annually each July, the City Manager
shall adjust the Fee by applying the total annual Fee adjustment for that year to the prior year's
Fee. The total annual Fee adjustment shall be reached by apportioning the adjustment in
construction cost and land acquisition cost calculated according to this section according to the
percentage each cost comprises of the whole Fee pursuant to the Report.
12. Credits and Reimbursement for Developer Constructed Facilities.
The City and a developer may enter into an improvement agreement to allow the
developer to construct certain of the Facilities. Such an agreement is totally discretionary on the
part of the Cry. Such agreement shall provide for security for the developer's commitment to
construct the Facilities and shall refer to this Resolution for credit and reimbursement. If the
City enters into such an agreement with a developer prior to construction of one or more of the
Facilities, the City shall provide the developer a credit in accordance with the following:
a. Credit Amount. The credit shall be in the amount of the lowest bid
received for construction of the facility, as approved by the Director of Public Works. However,
in no event S~all a credit pursuant to this provision exceed the current facility cost. For the
purposes of this section, such current facility cost shall be the amount listed in the Report for that
particular facility, as subsequently adjusted pursuant to Sections 11 and 12 of this resolution
prior to issuance of the building permit for that facility. Once issued, credit pursuant to this
section shall not be adjusted for inflation or any other factor. Credit provided pursuant to this
section is not transferable.
b. Application of Credit. Developers may apply credit given pursuant to this
section against the Fee applicable to a particular project, until the credit is exhausted or an excess
l0
credit results. The total credit shall be divided by the number of units to determine the amount of
credit that can be applied against the Fee for each unit, and if the credit per unit is less than the
Fee per unit. the developer shall pay the difference for each unit.
c. Reimbursement for Excess Credit. Reimbursement for excess credit shall
only be from remaining unspent Fee revenues. Once all the Facilities have been constructed or
acquired, ancl to the extent Fee revenues are sufficient to cover all claims for reimbursement of
Fee revenues, including reimbursement for excess credit, developers with excess credit shall be
entitled to reimbursement, subject to such developers certifying in writing to the City that the
cost of conslmcting the facility that resulted in an excess credit that was not passed on to tenants
of the development, and indemnifying the City from land-owner claims for reimbursement under
Government Code Section 66000 et seq., and Section 66001 in particular. If remaining Fee
revenues after all of the Facilities have been constructed or acquired are insufficient to cover all
claims for reimbursement of Fee revenues, such claims, including claims for reimbursement of
excess credit, shall be reimbursed on a pro rata basis in accordance with applicable law.
COl'Ol.l.O
engineers
City of South San Francisco
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
September 2002
FINAL
~ COrOLLO
7580 NORTH INGRAM AVENUE, SUITE 112 * FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711 · (559) 436-6616. FAX (559) 436-1191
\\FNO\DATA\DATA\FinaI\SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\TOC.doc
Septem 3er 12, 2002
6399A.¢0
City of South San Francisco
315 Maple Avenue
South San Francisco, California 94080
Attentio3: Ms. Barbara Hawkins, City Engineer
Subject: East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan - Final Report
Dear Ms. Hawkins:
We are 31eased to submit the final report for the City of South San Francisco East of
Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan. The report presents master planning
assump:ions, existing sewer system capacity evaluation, recommended facility
improvements, and a capital improvement program. The report is organized as follows:
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Chapter 2 - Planning Area Characteristics
Chapter 3 - Planning and Design Criteria
Chapter 4 - Existing System and Hydraulic Model
Chapter 5 - Evaluation and Proposed Improvements
Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program
We WOL Id like to extend our thanks to you, Mr. John Gibbs, Ramesh Bhagat, and other City
staff whose courtesy and cooperation were valuable components in completing this study
and producing this report.
Sincere y,
CAROL_O ENGINEERS, P.C.
Michael J. Britten. P.E.
Tony A. Akel, P.E.
MJBFFAA:cjp
EnclOSL res: Final Report
H:\Final~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00~Ltr~H awki003.doc
2700 YGN,~ClO VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 300. WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94598 o(925) 932-1710 · FAX (925) 930-0208
City of South San Francisco
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paae No.
EXEC .ITIVE SUMMARY
ES.1
ES.2
ES.3
ES.4
ES.5
ES.6
STUDY OBJECTIVE .......................................................................................... ES-1
STUDY AREA .................................................................................................... ES-1
SEWER SYSTEM OVERVIEW .......................................................................... ES-3
SEWER FLOWS ................................................................................................ ES-3
ES.4.1 Dry Weather Conditions .......................................................................... ES-4
ES.4.2 Wet Weather Conditions ......................................................................... ES-4
ES.4.3 Future Flow Conditions ........................................................................... ES-4
SEWER SYSTEM EVALUATION ....................................................................... ES-4
ES.5.1 Existing Deficiencies ............................................................................... ES-5
ES.5.2 Proposed Improvements ......................................................................... ES-5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .............................................................. ES-6
CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 1-1
SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION ........................................................................... 1-1
REPORT ORGANIZATION ................................................................................... 1-3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................... .................... 1-4
ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ................................................................. 1-4
CHAPTER 2 - PLANNING AREA CHARACTERISTICS
2.1
2.2
STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................... 2-1
LAND USE ............................................................................................................ 2-1
CHAPTER 3 - PLANNING AND DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1
3.2
3.3
GRAVITY SEWERS .............................................................................................. 3-1
3.1.1 Pipe Capacities .......................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.2 Manning Coefficient (n) .............................................................................. 3-1
3.1.3 Flow Depth Criteria (d/D) ........................................................................... 3-1
3.1.4 Changes in Pipe Size ................................................................................ 3-2
3.1.5 High Velocity Protection ............................................................................. 3-2
PUMP STATIONS AND FORCE MAINS ............................................................... 3-2
WASTEWATER FLOW COMPONENTS ............................................................... 3-4
3.3.1 BaseWastewater Flow .............................................................................. 3-4
3.3.2 Groundwater Infiltration ............................................................................. 3-4
3.3.3 Average Dry Weather Flow ........................................................................ 3-4
3.3.4 Peak Dry Weather Flow ............................................................................. 3-4
3.3.5 Maximum Day Wet Weather Flows ............................................................ 3-6
September 2002 i
\\FNO\DA TA\DATA\FinaI~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~TOC.doc
3.4
3.6
3.3.6 Peak Wet Weather Flow ............................................................................ 3-6
3.3.7 Inflow and Infiltration .................................................................................. 3-6
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY FLOWS ................................................ 3-6
WASTEWATER DESIGN FLOWS ........................................................................ 3-8
3.5.1 Flows Based on Industry Projections ......................................................... 3-8
3.5.2 Flows Based on Water Use ....................................................................... 3-8
3.5.3 Flows Based on Land Use ......................................................................... 3-8
FUTURE WASTEWATER FLOWS ........................................................................ 3-9
CHAPTER 4 - EXISTING SYSTEM AND HYDRAULIC MODEL
4.1
4.2
SYSTEM OVERVIEW ......................'. .................................................................... 4-1
4.1.1 Trunk Sewers ............................................................................................ 4-1
4.1.2 Pump Stations ........................................................................................... 4-6
Hydraulic Model .................................................................................................... 4-6
4.2.1 Selected Hydraulic Model .......................................................................... 4-6
4.2.2 Elements of the Hydraulic Model ............................................................... 4-6
4.2.3 Hydraulic Model Calibration ....................................................................... 4-9
CHAPTER 5 - EVALUATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
5.1
5.2
DESIGN FLOWS ................................................................................................... 5-1
5.1.1 Dry Weather Conditions ............................................................................. 5-1
5.1.2 WetWeather Conditions ............................................................................ 5-1
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................ 5-2
CHAPTER 6 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
6.1
6.2
COST
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.1.5
ESTIMATING CRITERIA ............................................................................ 6-1
Cost Estimating Accuracy .......................................................................... 6-1
Pipelines ....................................................... · ............................................. 6-2
Pump Stations ........................................................................................... 6-2
Land Acquisition ........................................................................................ 6-2
Construction Cost Index Adjustments ........................................................ 6-2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ................................................................. 6-3
6.2.1 Baseline Construction Cost ........................................................................ 6-3
6.2.2 Estimated Construction Cost ..................................................................... 6-3
6.2.3 Capital Improvement Cost ......................................................................... 6-3
6.2.4 AB 1600 Provisions ................................................................................... 6-4
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
A - MAJOR PROJECTS
B - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SAN BRUNO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
HISTORY
C - SEWER FLOW BALANCE
D - INDUSTRY FLOW PROJECTIONS SURVEY
E - 2001 WATER USE METERED DATA
F - SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
G - HYDRAULIC MODEL INPUT DATA
September 2002 ii
\\FNO\DATA\DATA\FinaI~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~TOC.doc
LIST OF TABLES
Table ES.1
Table 2.1
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table z..1
Table/--.2
Table 5.1
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Capital Improvement Program ................................................................ ES-6
Future Redevelopment .............................................................................. 2-5
Recommended Minimum Slopes for New Circular Pipes ........................... 3-3
Historical Flow Analysis ............................................................................. 3-5
Existing Pump Stations .............................................................................. 4-7
Historical Pump Station Flows ................................................................... 4-8
Design Flows ............................................................................................. 5-1
Pipeline Costs ............................................................................................ 6-2
Capital Improvement Program ................................................................... 6-5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure ES.1
Figure 1.1
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 3.1
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2
Figure 5.1
Study Area .............................................................................................. ES-2
Regional Location Map .............................................................................. 1-2
Study Area ................................................................................................. 2-3
Land Use ................................................................................................... 2-4
Future Redevelopment .............................................................................. 2-6
Historical Monthly Flows at WQCP ............................................................ 3-7
Existing Sewer System .............................................................................. 4-2
Structural Conditions and Frequent Maintenance ...................................... 4-3
Proposed Improvements ............................................................................ 5-3
Septer~ber 2002 iii
\\FNO\DATA\DATA\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\TOC.doc
Executive Summary
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101 SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
This executive summary presents a brief background of the City's sewer system, east of
Highway 101, the need for this master plan, proposed improvements to mitigate existing
capacity deficiencies, and proposed system improvements. A summary of the capital
improvement program costs, through the planning horizon year of 2020, is listed at the end
of this chapter.
ES.1 STUDY OBJECTIVE
Recognizing the importance of planning, developing, and financing sewer system facilities
to provide reliable and enhanced service for existing customers and to serve anticipated
land use redevelopment, the City initiated the preparation of this sewer system master
planning study.
The objective of the study included the following tasks:
· Establish sewer system design and planning criteria.
· Evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer collection system using computer
hydraulic modeling.
· Summarize existing system deficiencies and propose improvements to enhance
system reliability.
· Recommend improvements needed to service anticipated build out conditions.
· Develop a Capital Improvement Program with a planning horizon year of 2020.
· Prepare a Special Facilities Connection Charge report performed by another
Consultant.
· Comply with environmental clearances pertaining to the study area.
ES.2 STUDY AREA
The C'ty of South San Francisco is located in San Mateo County, approximately 10 miles
south of the City of San Francisco, and is bisected by U.S. Highway 101 in a north-south
direction. The study area is within the City's boundaries, east of Highway 101, as shown on
Figure ES.1. The San Francisco Bay borders the area to the north and east while the City
of San Bruno and the San Francisco International Airport (SFIA) surround the area to the
south. In 1999, Carollo Engineers performed an Infiltration and Inflow Study for the City,
west of Highway 101. The study included a small portion of the sewer system east of
Highway 101, upstream of the South San Francisco San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant
(WQC~). For the purpose of this master plan, this portion of the sewer system was not
considered.
ES-1
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\RpftES.doc
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
SAN BRUNO CANAL
N
LEGEND
STUDY AREA BOUNDARY
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
FIGURE ES.1
STUDY AREA
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
corol, l.O
The City's sewer collection system master plan identifies the infrastructure necessary to
service developed lands within the study area boundary. Because few vacant lands exist
east of Highway 101, the anticipated increase in sewer flows is a result of redevelopment of
existing parcels. According to City planning department staff, thirty-two areas are slated for
redevelopment during the planning horizon, while the remaining areas within the study area
are intended to maintain their existing land use designation over the next 20 years.
Accor¢ ing to the City's 1999 General Plan, the study area topography lies in the lowland
zone. This includes slopes less than 3 percent gradient and elevation ranges from 10 to
30 fee: mean sea level (msl). The highest elevation is Point San Bruno, part of the hillside
zone, located in the northeast portion of the study area. The lowland soil consists of artificial
fill underlain by Bay mud (organic rich clay and silty clay), which may be the cause of
settlement problems within the existing sewer system.
ES.3 SEWER SYSTEM OVERVIEW
The City's sanitary sewer system, east of Highway 101, consists of approximately 13 miles
of 6-inch through 30-inch diameter sewers, and includes 9 sewage pump stations and
associated force mains. The "backbone" of the sewer system consists of the trunk sewers,
generally 8-inches in diameter and larger, that were designed to convey the collected
wastewater to Pump Station No. 4 through intermediate pump stations, and to Pump
Station No. 7. In turn, the two pump stations convey the sewer flows, with a 21 -inch force
main, :o the South San Francisco San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP) located
on Bel e Air Road, east of South Airport Boulevard.
The C'ty's rapid growth period, during the 1930s and 1940s, is also indicative of an aging
sanitary sewer infrastructure. As the sanitary sewer system'ages, leaks and breaks in pipes
result 'n the entrance of extraneous flows into the sewer system. These flows, originating
from e'ther rainfall or groundwater infiltration, also know as infiltration and inflow (I/I), can
create capacity problems for the system. The existing system experiences problems with
sags in the sewer lines, settlement, and flooding, which may be caused by I/I.
ES.4 SEWER FLOWS
Historical flows at the wastewater treatment facility were reviewed and analyzed to
determine daily, monthly, and seasonal fluctuations experienced by the sewer system. The
flow data from the WQCP indicates that the year 2001 average flow within the study area
was 1.6 MGD and the measured maximum day wet weather flow was 2.6 MGD. Because
2001 was a "dry" year as compared to previous years, the peak hour flow data used in this
study was extracted from historical data at the WQCP from 1998-1998. Peak flows, for
which sewer facilities are sized, are determined by applying a peaking factor to average
flows. The peaking factor generally ranges between 1.5 and 3.0, depending on the size of
the tributary area, with larger areas corresponding to smaller peaking factors.
ES-3
September 2002
H:\Final\S oSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~ES.doc
ES.4.1 Dry Weather Conditions
Durin.c existing dry weather conditions, the average flow and peak hour flows from the
study area are 1.5 and 3.4 MGD, respectively. At the 2020 planning horizon year condition,
the average and peak hour dry weather flows are anticipated to approach 5.5 and
12.1 IVGD, respectively.
ES.4.2 Wet Weather Conditions
Evalu&ting the capacity adequacy of the City's sewer system during wet weather conditions
included applying a hypothetical 5-year 24-hour design storm that increased the infiltration
and intlows determined by the hydraulic model.
Shoul¢ the design storm occur, the hydraulic model projects existing average and peak
hour flows from the study area of 2.5 MGD and 5.5 MGD, respectively. Applying the same
storm event during the build out condition results with average and peak hour flows of
6.4 MGD and 14.1 MGD from the study area respectively. These projected wet weather
flows &ssume no mitigation to the current infiltration and inflow rates.
ES.4.3 Future Flow Conditions
The fu;ure average dry weather flows calculated to model the 2020 planning horizon year
conditi3n were determined based on industry projections and calculated flows. Industry
projections were provided by several industries east of Highway 101 in response to a
survey by City Staff. Thirty-two areas are slated for future redevelopment and will redevelop
by changing their land use designation, mostly to Office/Research and Development
(ORD), resulting in increased wastewater flowrates. The remaining lands east of Highway
101 are assumed to maintain their existing designation throughout the planning year
horizon.
For this master plan study, the flow coefficients applied to the redeveloped areas were
extracted from City studies and current project reports. Ray Honan, the City's
Enviro 3mental Compliance Coordinator, has revised the water demand rate for ORD by
estimating wastewater generation at 90 percent of the water demand rate. The revised
wastewater flow coefficient of 400 gpd/1000 sq. ft. was applied to areas converting to the
ORD land use designation.
ES.5 SEWER SYSTEM EVALUATION
The City's sewer system was evaluated based on the analysis and design criteria defined in
this stL dy. A hydraulic sewer model was assembled and used in evaluating the adequacy of
the City's sewer system. The hydraulic model combines information on the physical
characteristics of the sewer system (pipe sizes, pipe slopes, pumps, etc.), and performs
calcul&tions to solve a series of mathematical equations to simulate flows in pipes.
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~ES.doc
ES-4
The average flows east of Highway 101 were estimated by obtaining industrial flow
projec-.ions, utilizing the 2001 Metered Water Use database, and applying land use
coefficient factors. A 5-year 24-hour storm event was used to simulate the wet weather
flows.
ES.5.1 Existing Deficiencies
In general, the City's existing sewer system is performing at capacity under existing flow
condit'ons, with one notable exception. Pump Station No. 4 is considerably deficient during
peak wet weather flow conditions. To facilitate the existing and future sewer flows, it is
recommended that the existing pumps be replaced and two new pumps added to this pump
statior for a firm capacity of 9,000 gpm. This project is quantified in the Capital
Improvement Program of this master plan.
ES.5.2 Proposed Improvements
Increased future flows from redeveloped lands resulted with hydraulic deficiencies that
require pipe size upgrades and capacity upgrades at many of the pump stations. Notable
projects are highlighted below.
Allerton Trunk. The Allerton Trunk conveys flows from the eastern portion of the study
area. As upstream parcels redevelop to the Office/Reseamh & Development designation,
the increased sewer flows routed through the Allerton Trunk will result in a capacity
deficiency. It is proposed that the existing 15-inch trunk sewer be replaced with a new 18-
inch p pe.
East Grand Trunk. In addition to the increased flow routed through the Allerton Trunk,
lands along East Grand Avenue will redevelop to the ORD designation and the capacity of
the ex'sting East Grand Trunk will become deficient. It is recommended that the existing 15-
inch a3d 18-inch portions of this trunk be replaced with new 21-inch, 24-inch and 27-inch
pipes.
Pump Station No. 2. Pump Station No. 2 becomes deficient during future peak wet
weather flow conditions and requires a firm capacity upgrade of 1400 gpm. To mitigate this
deficiency, it is recommended that the existing pumps be replaced with three new pumps.
Pump Station No. 8. As a result of increased future sewer flows from ORD redevelopment,
Pump Station No. 8 requires a capacity upgrade. Three new 700 gpm capacity pumps are
recorrmended.
Other recommended pipeline and pump station improvements are quantified in the Capital
Improvement Program of this master plan.
ES-5
Septe-nber 2002
H:\Final~S oS FO_FNO\6399A00~R pt~ES, doc
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the need for this sewer system master plan and the objectives of the
study. A list of abbreviations is also provided to assist the reader in understanding the
information presented.
1.1 BACKGROUND
The City of South San Francisco (Figure 1.1 ) operates its own sewer system and
associated infrastructure facilities and services customers within the City Limits.
Wastewater is conveyed to the South San Francisco San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant
(WQC ~). The WQCP receives flows from the San Francisco International Airport, the cities
of South San Francisco, San Bruno, Burlingame, Millbrae, and portions of the City of Daly
City ar d the Town of Colma. The cities are members of the North Bayside System Unit
(NBSL), which is the Joint Powers Authority responsible for the operation of certain shared
transport and disposal facilities.
The portion of the City east of Highway 101 is an industrial area, home to many high-tech
research and development firms that generate high wastewater flowrates. Anticipated
redevelopment will increase flows and result with deficiencies requiring an upgrade to the
collect on system.
1.2 SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION
Recog 3izing the importance of planning, developing, and financing sewer system facilities
to provide reliable and enhanced service for existing customers and to serve anticipated
increased fiowrates, the City initiated the preparation of this sewer system master planning
study.
On December 4, 2001, the City authorized Carollo Engineers, P.C. (Carollo) to prepare this
sewer system master plan study which included the following tasks:
· Es-.ablish sewer system design and planning criteria.
Evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer collection system using computer hydraulic
modeling.
· Su'nmarize existing system deficiencies and propose improvements to enhance system
reliability.
· Recommend improvements needed to service anticipated future flows.
· Develop a Capital Improvement Program with a planning horizon year of 2020.
· Prepare a Special Facilities Connection Charge report performed by a subconsultant.
· Comply with environmental clearances pertaining to the study area.
1-1
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~01 .doc
N
N.T.S.
FIGURE 1.1
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
The st Jdy includes several planning assumptions that are documented in this report.
Should future planning conditions deviate from the assumptions stated in this master plan
(i.e., accelerated growth, more intense developments, etc.), revisions and adjustments to
the m&ster plan recommendations would be necessary.
1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION
The sewer system master plan report contains seven chapters, followed by appendices that
provide supporting documentation for the information presented in the report. The chapters
are briefly described below:
Chapt~.r I - Introduction. This chapter presents the need for this sewer system master
plan a 3d the objectives of the study. A list of abbreviations is also provided to assist the
reader in understanding the information presented.
Chapter 2 - Planning Area Characteristics. This chapter presents a discussion of this
study's planning area characteristics, defining the land use classifications and summarizing
the proposed future redevelopment within the study area.
Chapter 3 - Planning and Design Criteria. The capacity of the study area's sanitary sewer
system was evaluated based on the analysis and design criteria defined in this chapter.
Historical flows at the wastewater treatment facility were reviewed and analyzed to
determine daily, monthly and seasonal fluctuations experienced by the sewer system. The
developed criteria address the sewer system capacity, acceptable pipe gravity slopes,
accep;able depths of flow within pipes, average sewer flow coefficients, and daily and
hourly peaking factors.
Chapter 4 - Existing System and Hydraulic Model. This Chapter presents an overview of
the sewer collection system east of Highway 101. The chapter also describes the
development and calibration of the City's Sewer Hydraulic Model. This model was used for
identifying existing system deficiencies and for recommending enhancements.
Chapter 5 - Sewer System Evaluation and Proposed Improvements. This chapter
presents the results of the capacity evaluation of the sewer system. The chapter also
presents improvements to mitigate existing system deficiencies and for servicing future
growtl'. These improvements are recommended based on the system's technical
requirements, cost effectiveness, and operational reliability.
Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program. This chapter presents the recommended
Capit&l Improvement Program (CIP) for the study area's sewer system. The program is
based on the evaluation of the sewer system, and on the recommended projects described
in the ~revious chapters. The CIP has been staged to the planning horizon year of 2020.
Septe'nber 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\01 .doc
1-3
1.4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Carollo wishes to acknowledge and thank Mr. John Gibbs, Public Works Director; Ms.
Barbara Hawkins, City Engineer; Mr. Ramesh Baghat, Project Manager. Their own and
their s;aff's cooperation and courtesy in obtaining a variety of necessary information were
valuable components in completing and producing this report.
1.5 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
To cot serve space and to improve readability, the following abbreviations are used in this
report.
ADWF
ASCE
BWF
CIP
City
cfs
County
DOF
ENR CCI
fps
GIS Master
gpda
GWI
HYDRA
I/I
LF
MDWWF
MGD
msl
ORD
PDWF
PWWF
RDI/I
ROW
WEF
WQCP
average dry weather flow
American Society of Civil Engineers
base wastewater flow
capital improvement program
City of South San Francisco
cubic feet per second
County of San Mateo
Department of Finance
Engineering News Records Construction Cost Index
feet per second
AutoCAD "add-on" tool used to assemble hydraulic model
gallons per day per acre
groundwater infiltration
Computer Hydraulic Model developed by Pizer
infiltration/inflow
linear feet
maximum day wet weather flow
million gallons per day
mean sea level
Office Research and Development
peak dry weather flow
peak wet weather flow
rainfall dependent infiltration & inflow
right-of-way
Water Environment Federation
South San Francisco San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant
1-4
September 2002
H :\Final~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~01 .doc
Commercial (COM)
-he commercial designation is intended for retail business and professional services.
Hotel (HCOM)
-his designation includes visitor services consisting of hotels, motels, and resorts.
13dustrial (IND)
-he industrial designation accounts for a majority of the lands on the east side of the
City, and is used primarily for light manufacturing and warehousing.
Marine Commercial (MARCOM)
-he marine commercial designation includes commercial uses near the Oyster Point
Marina.
Office (OFF)
-his designation is intended to provide sites for administrative, financial, business,
professional, medical and public office uses.
Office/Research and Development (ORD)
-he office/research and development (R&D) designation includes office,
manufacturing, and R&D uses.
Open Space/Public (OS/PUB)
-he open space/public designation includes public- and privately- owned open space
and City facilities, such as the WQCP.
Park (PARK)
-his designation locates the existing parks within City limits.
Vacant (VAC)
-his designation accounts for undeveloped lands or lands where projects are under
review, approved or under construction.
Most of the study area is built out, however redevelopment of these lands will occur in the
future (Appendix A). Table 2.1 describes the proposed redevelopment areas east of
Highway 101, while Figure 2.3 identifies their location. Most of the areas will convert to the
ORD designation, resulting in significantly higher sewer flows than those currently
experienced by the system.
2-2
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SDSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~02.doc
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
N
LEGEND
m STUDY AREA BOUNDARY
I
/
SAN BRUNO CANAL
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
I
[
FIGURE 2.1
STUDY AREA
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
COI'OI.I.O
I
Source: City of South San Francisco
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
SAN BRUNO CANAL
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
N
LEGEND
~ Study Area
airport
commercial
I hote
industrial
~ marine com
or, ce
I office/r&d
open space
park
parking
vacant
water
Subarea
FIGURE 2.2
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
en~lneer~
Table 2.1 Future Redevelopment
AREA ID(a)
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
GROSS
PROPOSED SITE AREA FLOOR FLOOR
AREA
LAND USE (ACRES) (ACRES) AREA (SF) AREA RATIO
OFF 12.8 1.1 120,000 2.5
2 ORD 20.0 17.0 ~7,4~ 2.6
3 ORD 7.4 2.7
7.2
4 OFF 2.3 1.9
5 OFF 4.6 4.1
6 ORD 6.9 5.8
7 ORD 2.8 2.6
8 ORD 13.2 12.7
9 ORD 3.9 3.1
10 ORD 27.1 22.2
COM
HCOM (350 rooms)
11 ORD 21.5 20~0
COM
HCOM (350 rooms)
orOFF
12 ORD 11.6 5.4
250,000 0.8
13 ORD
14 ORD
15 ORD
16 OFF
17 ORD
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Notes:
18 ORD
CITY CASE NO.
19 COM
20 ORD
21 ORD
22 ORD
23 ORD
24 ORD
25 ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
HCOM
ORD
1. Per City Planning Staff (Jan 2002).
UP 99-08O
ND 99-080
UP 00-064
ND 00-064
NOTE I
22,000 0.3 NOTE 1
90,000 0.5 UP 93-940/MOD1
ND 93-940/MOD1
200,000 0.8 UP 01-034
ND 01-034
112,820 1.0 NOTE 1
552,776 1.0 NOTE 1
48,391 0.4 PUD 98-053/MOD1
ND 98-053/MOD1
564,000 0.6 SP 97-027/MOD1
10,000 0.0
600,000 0.7 $P 97-027/MOD1
20,000 0.0
200,000 0.2
107,960 0.5 UP 99-065
ND 99-065
7.5 6.8 154,000 0.5 UP 01-032
ND 01-032
7.0 6.5 225,815 0.8 NOTE 1
18.8 19.9 694,172 0.8 NOTE 1
38.0 10.9 236,300 0.5 UP 00-024
ND 00-024
3.8 2.4 105,000 1.0 UP 00-014
ND 00-014
6.8 3.5 155,000 1.0 VAR 00-074
ND 00-074
20.6 180,000 NOTE 1
29.2 24.1 838,443 0.8 NOTE 1
7.5 6.1 263,974 1.0 NOTE 1
5.8 5.2 180,861 0.8 NOTE 1
17.3 16.1 559,659 0.8 NOTE 1
19.4 13.7 475,675 0.8 NOTE 1
9.9 8.1 282,269 0.8 NOTE 1
15.3 15.2 528,296 0.8 NOTE 1
1.7 1.6 63,550 0.9 UP 99-068
31.9 28.4 987,941 0.8 NOTE 1
6.8 4.3 150,892 0.8 NOTE 1
9.1 8.7 303,875 0.8 NOTE 1
8.0 6.8 237,768 0.8 ND-99-005
27.4 27.0 783,533 0.7 UP-01-006
2. Developed from Major Projects October 2001
3. See Figure 2.3 for locations.
(Appendix A).
! I I I I ~ I I I I 1 I t ! I I I I I
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
SAN BRUNO CANAL
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
N
LEGEND
Study Area
Redevelopment
20 Area ID
Future
Redevelopment
FIGURE 2.3
FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
COI'OI.I.O
I n (11 nil r I
Chapter 3
PLANNING AND DESIGN CRITERIA
The ct pacity of the City's sanitary sewer system,, east of Highway 101, was evaluated
based on the analysis and design criteria defined in this chapter. Historical flows at the
wastewater treatment facility were reviewed and analyzed to determine daily, monthly and
seasonal fluctuations experienced by the sewer system. The developed criteria address the
sewer system capacity, acceptable pipe gravity slopes, acceptable depths of flow within
pipes, average sewer flow coefficients, and daily and hourly peaking factors.
3.1 GRAVITY SEWERS
Capac'ty analysis of the gravity sewers was performed in accordance with the criteria
established in this section.
3.1.1 Pipe Capacities
Sewer pipe capacities are dependent on many factors. These include roughness of the
pipe, ti' e chosen maximum allowable depth of flow, and limiting velocity and slope. The
Continuity equation and the Manning equation for steady-state flow are used for gravity
sewer ~ydraulic calculations:
Continuity Equation: Q = V A
Where:Q = peakflow, cfs
V = velocity, fps
A
= cross-sectional area of pipe, sq. ft.
Manning
Where:V =
n=
R=
S=
Equation: V = (1.486 R 2/3 St/2)/n
velocity, fps
Manning's coefficient of friction
hydraulic radius (area divided by wetted perimeter), ft
slope of pipe, feet per foot
3.1.2 Manning Coefficient (n)
The M&nning coefficient 'n' is a friction coefficient and varies with respect to pipe material,
size of 3ipe, depth of flow, smoothness of joints, root intrusion, and other factors. For sewer
pipes, the Manning Coefficient typically ranges between 0.011 and 0.017, with 0.013 being
a representative value used for system master planning purposes.
3.1.3 Flow Depth Criteria (d/D)
When designing sewer pipelines, it is common practice to adopt variable flow depth criteria
for various pipe sizes. This criteria is expressed as a maximum depth of flow to pipe
diameter ratio (d/D). Design d/D ratios typically range from 0.5 to 1.0, with the lower values
3-1
Septerr ber 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~03.doc
typica ly used for smaller pipes - which may experience flow peaks greater than planned or
may experience blockages from debris, paper, or rags. It is recommended that a design d/D
ratio of 0.75 be used for designing new gravity sewer pipes within the study area.
The design flow criteria established for the City's existing sewer system hydraulic model
already provide sufficient degree of conservatism, and utilizing a d/D ratio of 0.75 for
analysis purposes may lead to premature or unnecessary replacement of existing pipelines.
There'ore, a d/D ratio of 0.9 will be utilized to evaluate the study area's existing trunk
syster3, while a d/D ratio of 0.75 will be utilized for designing the future trunk system.
Furthermore, when evaluating the pipe capacities during peak wet weather flows, pipes
were &llowed to surcharge and the hydraulic grade line allowed to rise up to one foot below
the manhole rims.
In order to minimize the settlement of sewage solids, it is standard practice in the design of
gravity sewers to specify that a minimum velocity of 2 feet per second (fps) be maintained
when ;he pipeline is half-full. At this velocity, the sewer flow will typically provide self-
cleaning for the pipe. Due to hydraulics of a circular conduit, velocity of half-full flow in pipes
approaches the velocity of nearly full flow in pipes. Table 3.1 lists the minimum slopes for
maint~.ining self-cleaning full flow velocities. It does not list slopes less than 0.0008, which
is the minimum practical slope for gravity sewer in construction. It should be noted that
greate' slopes are desirable if they are compatible with existing topography, though not to
exceed a velocity of 10 fps.
3.1.4 Changes in Pipe Size
When a smaller sewer joins a large one, the invert of the larger sewer will be lowered
sufficiently to maintain the same energy gradient. An approximate method for securing
these 'esults is to place the 0.8 depth point of both sewers at the same elevation. For
maste' planning purposes, and in the absence of field data, sewer crowns will be matched
at the manholes.
3.1.5 High Velocity Protection
The m'nimum and maximum recommended velocities are 2.0 and 6.5 fps, respectively.
Higher velocities may be permitted on steeper hills; however, should velocities be greater
than 15 fps, special provisions shall be made to protect against displacement by erosion
and in-pact.
3.2 PUMP STATIONS AND FORCE MAINS
Pump stations will be evaluated and designed for peak flow with one standby pump having
a capacity equal to the largest operating unit. The Hazen-Williams formula is commonly
used for the design of force mains. The velocity equation is:
3-2
September 2002
H:\FinaI\SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\R pt~03.doc
V = 1.32 C R 0.63 S 0.54
Where:
V = mean velocity, fps
C = roughness coefficient
R = hydraulic radius, ft
S = slope of the energy grade line, ft/ft
The v~lue of the Hazen-Williams 'C' varies with the type of pipe material and is influenced
by the type of construction and age of the pipe. A 'C' value of 120 will be used for this
Master Plan.
Table 3.1
Recommended Minimum Slopes for Circular Pipes
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
d/D = 0.50
d/D = 0.75
Preferred Minimum
Pipe Size Sl°pe(1) Pipe Capacity Slope(2) Pipe Capacity
(inches) (ft/ft) (mgd) I (cfs) (ft/ft) (mgd) I (cfs)
6 0.0049 0.13 0.20 0.0038 0.20 0.31
8 0.0033 0.22 0.35 0.0026 0.36 0.55
10 0.0025 0.35 0.55 0.0019 0.56 0.87
12 0.0019 0.50 0.78 0.0015 0.79 1.23
15 0.0015 0.81 1.25 0.0011 1.28 1.98
18 0.0011 1.13 1.74 0.0009 1.78 2.75
21 0.0009 1.54 2.38 0.0007 2.43 3.76
24 0.0008 2.07 3.20 0.0006 3.27 5.05
27 0.0007 2.65 4.10 0.0005 4.18 6.47
30 0.0006 3.25 5.02 0.0004 5.13 7.94
33 0.0005 3.82 5.91 0.0004 6.04 9.34
36 0.0005 4.82 7.46 0.0003 7.61 11.78
42 0.0004 6.50 10.06 0.0003 10.27 15.90
Notes:
1. Preferred slopes (Manning's formula) are desirable for maintaining self cleaning velocities
of 2 fps, when the pipe is half-full.
M'nimum slopes (Manning's formula) are calculated based on maintaining velocities of
2 -'ps when pipes are three-quarters full.
Approval by the City Engineer is required if:
a. Designed slopes are flatter than the minimum slopes.
b. Designed slopes are flatter than the practical slope of 0.0008.
3-3
Septer3ber 2002
H :\Final~Sc SFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\03.doc
3.3 WASTEWATER FLOW COMPONENTS
Wastewater flows consist of sanitary flow from City residential, commercial, and industrial
users, termed base wastewater flow (BWF), plus extraneous groundwater and storm water,
terme¢ infiltration/inflow (I/I), that may enter the sewers through pipe and manhole defects
or direct drainage connections. BWF generally follow a consistent diurnal pattern, with the
peak flow typically occurring in the early to mid-morning hours. I/I flows are dependent upon
grounc water levels and rainfall patterns. Peak I/I flows occur during major rainstorms and
are related to the intensity and duration of rainfall. Table 3.2 shows the historical flow
analys's performed in order to determine the existing flow components.
3.3.1 Base Wastewater Flow
The b~.se wastewater flow (BWF) is the flow generated by the City's residential,
commercial, and industrial customers. The flow has a diurnal pattern that varies with land
use ca;egories. Commercial and industrial patterns, though they vary depending on the
type of use, typically have more consistent higher flow patterns during business hours, and
lower f ows at night. Furthermore, the diurnal flow pattern experienced during a weekend
may v&ry from the diurnal flow experienced during a weekday.
3.3.2 Groundwater Infiltration
Groundwater Infiltration (GWI), one of the components of I/I, is associated with extraneous
water entering the sewer system through defects in pipes and manholes. This component is
related to the condition of the sewer pipes, manholes, and groundwater levels.
Groundwater infiltration may occur throughout the year, although groundwater infiltration
rates are typically higher in the late winter and early spring. Dry weather groundwater
infiltrat on (or base infiltration) cannot easily be separated from BWF by flow measurement
technic ues.
3.3.3 Average Dry Weather Flow
The average dry weather flow (ADWF) is the average flow that occurs on a daily basis
during the dry weather season, with no evident reaction to rainfall. The ADWF includes the
BWF generated by the City's residential, commercial, and industrial users, plus the dry
weather GWI component. The importance of this component lies in its use as a basis for
expressing other flow components by applying multipliers to the ADWF. In 2001, the
average dry weather flow within the study area was 1.5 MGD.
3.3.4 Peak Dry Weather Flow
The peak dry weather flow (PDWF) is the highest observed hourly flow that occurs during
the dry weather season. The peak dry weather flow component is typically used for
designing the capacity of sewer pipes, and it was used in this analysis to evaluate the
sewer system. In 2001, the City's study area peak dry weather flow was 3.4 MGD.
3-4
September 2002
H:\FinaI\SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\03.doc
Table 3.2
Year
Historical Flow Analysis
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Average Seasonal Average
Annual Dry Weather Wet Weather
AAF ADWF AWWF
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
Peak Hour
r)ry Weather
PDWF
(mgd)
1996 1.35 1.28 2.80
1997 1.63 1.62 2.80
1998 1.80 1.80 3.40
2001 1.59 1.51 3.40
Seasonal Average
Dry Weather Wet Weather
ADWF AWWF
Average
Annual
AAF
Flow Components (mgd) u,zj
Maximum Month Maximum Day
Dry Weather Wet Weather Dry Weather Wet Weather
MMDWF MMWWF MDDWF MDWWF
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SAN BRUNO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
1.39 1.40 1.60 1.70 2.40
1.63 1.70 1.70 2.00 2.60
1.80 1.80 2.20 2.10 3.00
1.70 1.60 1.90 1.81 2.55
Peaking Factors (applied to ADWF)
Maximum Month Maximum Day
Dry Weather Wet Weather Dry Weather Wet Weather
MMDWF MMWWF MDDWF MDWWF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SAN BRUNO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
1.09 I. 10 1.25 1.33 1.88
1.01 1.05 1.05 1.23 1.60
1.00 1.00 1.22 1.17 1.67
1.12 1.06 1.25 1.20 1.68
Dry Weather
PDWF
Year
1996 1.06 1.00 2.20
1997 1.00 1.00 1.72
1998 1.00 1.00 1.91
2001 1.05 1.00 2.25
Notes:
1. Study Period Dry Seasons: 1996 (June to September), 1997 (May to September), 1998 (June to August), and 2001 (April to October).
2. Peaking Factors are multipliers applied to the Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF).
3. 2001 Peak Flows based on 1998 PDWF and 1996 PWWF
4. Flow Components Definitions:
AAF = Average Annual Flow (annual flow, expressed in daily or oiher time units)
ADWF = Average Dry Weather Flow (average flow that occurs on a daily basis during the dry weather season, with no evident reaction to rainfall)
AWWF = Average Wet Weather Flow (average flow that occurs on a daily basis during the wet weather season)
BWF = Base Wastewater Flow (average flow that is generated by residential, commemial, and industrial users)
MMDWF = Maximum Month Dry Weather Flow (maximum month flow during the dry weather season)
MMWWF = Maximum Month Wet Weather Flow (maximum month flow during the wet weather season)
MDDWF = Maximum Day Dry Weather Flow (highest measured daily flow that occurs during a dry weather season).
MDDWF typically range between 2 and 3 times higher thant the ADWF for well constructed systems.
MDWWF = Maximum Day Wet Weather Flow (highest measured daily flow that occurs during a wet weather season)
PDWF = Peak Hour Dry Weather Flow (highest measured hourly flowthat occurs during a dry weather day)
PWWF = Peak Hour Wet Weather Flow (highest measured hourly flow that occurs during v~t weather),
PWWF typically range between 3 and 4 times higher thant the ADWF for v~l constructed systems.
Maximum Daily Inflow = MDWWF - ADWF (the difference between the wet weather maximum daily flow and the average dray weather flow)
Rainfall-Induced Peak Rate = PWWF - PDWF (the difference between the wet weather peak hourly flow and the dry weather peak hourly flow)
Wet Weather
PWWF
(mgd)
5.30
5.10
4.80
5.30
Peak Hour
Wet Weather
PWWF
4.13
3.14
2.66
3.50
3.3.5 Maximum Day Wet Weather Flows
The maximum day wet weather flow (MDWWF) is the highest daily flow that occurs during
the wet weather season. The Water Environment Federation (WEF) Manual of Practice
FD-6 &nd the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Manual and Report on
Engineering Practice No. 62 suggest that the MDWWF to ADWF ratio typically ranges
between 2 and 3, even in well-constructed systems. Higher values usually indicate a more
pronoL nced I/I problem. In 2001, the City's study area maximum day wet weather flow was
2.5 MGD and the MDWWF to ADWF ratio was 1.68.
3.3.6 Peak Wet Weather Flow
The peak wet weather flow (PWWF) is the highest observed hourly flow that occurs during
the wet weather season. The peak wet weather flow component is typically used for
designing the capacity of the sewer system while providing some acceptable allowance for
surcharging. The hydraulic analysis allowed surcharging during wet weather conditions with
the hydraulic grade line rising up to a foot below the manhole rim. Flows that exceeded that
level were considered causing a deficiency.
Because 2001 was a "dry" year as compared to previous years, the peak hour flow data
used in this study was extracted from historical data at the WQCP from 1996-1998. In 1996,
the StL dy area experienced a PWWF of 5.3 MGD. The hydraulic model was calibrated to
simulate this PWWF in 2001.
The WEF Manual of Practice FD-6 and ASCE Manual No. 62 suggest typical wet peak to
dry average ratios ranging between 3 and 4, with higher values indicative of pronounced
infiltration and inflows. In the study area this ratio is 3.5.
3.3.7 Inflow and Infiltration
Inflow's a sharp rise in flow in direct response to a rainfall event. Infiltration is a slower
respor se to the rainfall event, which builds up with time and continues even after rainfall
has stopped. Rainfall Dependent Infiltration and Inflow (RDI/I) is typically estimated by
reviewng and examining flow components, and by conducting temporary or long term flow
monitoring programs. Due to time constraints, the hydraulic model was utilized to develop
the RDI/I rates used to model the PWWF.
3.4 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY FLOWS
The in'rial step in establishing the wastewater flow criteria for the City, east of Highway 101,
included a review of historical flow data influent to the Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP)
collected for the past year. Monthly historical flows at the WQCP influent line were
extracled from the City's WQCP monthly monitoring program records (Appendix B), and are
summarized on Figure 3.1.
3-6
Septernber 2002
H:\Final~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~03.doc
Figure 3.1
Historical Monthly Flows at WQCP
East of Highway 101 Sewer Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
2001 Flows
'O 2- ·
E
PS 4,7-ADF
PS 4,7-MDF
- - - Max-Day to Avg-Day
Jan-01 :eb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01 May-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01
-8
-7
-6
5
4
-3
2
,, 1
Nov-01 Dec-01
Month
Figure Data
PS No. 4, ? (WQCP) Flows
Month/ Minimum Average Maximum
Year Day Day Day
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
Jan-01 1.2 1.7 2.3
Feb-01 1.3 1.9 2.3
Mar-01 1.3 1.7 2.3
Apr-01 1.1 1.5 1.8
May-01 1.1 1,5 1.7
Jun-01 1.1 1.5 1.7
Jul-01 1.2 1.5 1.7
Aug-01 1.2 1.6 1.7
Sep-01 1.2 1.5 1.8
Oct-01 1.2 1.5 1.8
Nov-01 1.1 1.5 2.6
Dec-01 1.1 1.7 2.4
Notes
1 Data Source: South San Francisco-San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant
2 See Appendix B
Max-Day
Avg-Day
Factor
1.3
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.7
1.4
mimics the actual existing flow conditions in the hydraulic model, and to avoid
recommending premature construction of relief, or replacement of existing, sewer facilities.
3.6 FUTURE WASTEWATER FLOWS
The rut Jre ADWF calculated to model the ~0~0 planning horizon year condition were
determ'ned based on industry projections and calculated flows. Industry projections were
provided by several industries east of Highway 101 in accordance with a specific survey by
City st&ff. Thirty-two areas are slated for future redevelopment as indicated in Figure 2.3.
These areas will redevelop by changing their land use designation, mostly to
Office/Reseamh & Development (ORD), resulting in increased wastewater flowrates. The
remain'ng lands east of Highway 101 are assumed to maintain their existing designation
throughout the planning year horizon.
Average sewer flow coefficients are factors applied to an area of land in order to calculate
ADWF generated by a particular land use designation. For this master plan study, the flow
coefficients applied to the redeveloped areas were extracted from City studies and current
project reports. Ray Honan, the City's Environmental Compliance Coordinator, has revised
water c emand rates in accordance with the Bay West Cove Commercial Project Planning
Area One report dated August 2001.
In that 'eport, the average water use for pharmaceutical manufacturing ranged from
250 gp:l/1,000 sq. ft. to 1,300 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. Assuming that 80 percent of the biotech
space will be used for research and development and 20 percent for prototype
development, the resulting average water demand rate is 450 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. The
wastewater generation rate is estimated at 90 pement of the water demand rate, or
400 gpd/1000 sq. ft. To be consistent with said report, 400 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. was applied to
the areas converting to the ORD land use designation.
3-9
Septer~ber 2002
H:\Fina~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~03.cloc
Chapter 4
EXISTING SYSTEM AND HYDRAULIC MODEL
This chapter presents an overview of the City's sewer collection system. The chapter also
describes the development and calibration of the City's Sewer Hydraulic Model. This model
was used for identifying existing system deficiencies and for recommending enhancements.
4.1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
The Ci.-y's sanitary sewer system, east of Highway 101, consists of approximately 13 miles
of 6-inch through 30-inch pipe (Figure 4.1 ). The "backbone" of the sewer system consists of
the tru 3k sewers, generally 8-inches in diameter and larger, that were designed to convey
the col ected wastewater to Pump Station No. 4 through intermediate pump stations, and to
Pump Station No. 7. In turn, the two pump stations convey the sewer flows, with a 21-inch
fome main, to the WQCP located on Belle Air Road, east of South Airport Boulevard.
The Ci.-y's rapid growth period, during the 1930s and 1940s, is also indicative of an aging
sanitary sewer infrastructure, as shown on Figure 4.2. As the sanitary sewer system ages,
leaks &nd breaks in pipes result in the entrance of extraneous flows into the sewer system.
These flows, originating from either rainfall or groundwater infiltration, also know as
infiltrat on and inflow (I/I), can create capacity problems for the system. The existing system
experiences problems with sags in the sewer lines, settlement, and flooding, which may be
causec by I/I.
4.1.1 Trunk Sewers
The major components of the City's trunk sewer system are shown on Figure 4.1, and their
major alignments described below starting at the downstream end and continuing
upstream. Each trunk sewer has been assigned a name that identifies it with the
predominant street(s) alignment.
4.1.1.1 Harbor Way Trunk
The H~.rbor Way Trunk begins at Pump Station No. 4 and continues northward (upstream)
along Harbor Way with a 30-inch pipe, then a 27-inch pipe, to East Grand Avenue. This
major i3tersection intercepts all upstream flows from six of the nine operating pump stations
as the 'nain trunk branches to the east and to the west along East Grand Avenue.
4.1.1.2 Harbor Way Subtrunk
The H~.rbor Way Subtrunk is tributary to the Harbor Way Trunk and connects to that trunk
at Pum3 Station No. 4. The subtrunk continues south (upstream) along Harbor Way with an
8-inch pipe to the intersection with Utah Avenue. It then turns westward with a 6-inch
4-1
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~04.doc
1
IJ jIJ ,," OYSTER POINT SUBTRUNK.
N.T.S.
LEGEND
I~ STUDY AREA BOUNDARY
'"-' MODELED SEWER PIPE
· ,~~' FORCE MAIN
PUMP STATION
PUMP STATION
NUMBER
FIGURE 4.1
EXISTING SEWER
COLLECTION SYSTEM
crrY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
ROOT
INTRUSION
POOR ~
STATION STRUCTURE
/SETTLEMENT)
FLOODS
PUMP STATION
SETTLEMENT
N.T.S.
LEGEND
~ STUDY ARB BOUNDARY
I MODELED S~ER PIPE
III FORCE MAIN
i CONDITION/MAINTENANCE
PUMP STATION
STRUCTU~L CONDITION
EXISTING PUMP STATION
PUMP STATION NUMBER
PS 5
FORBES BLVD
2"
PS
10'
GREASE BUILDUP
(OPERATIONAL)
GREASE BUILDUP
(OPERATIONAL)
AGING PIPE
MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS AT
JUNCTION CONVERGANCE
SIGNIFICANT SETTLEMENT
(POOR SOIL CONDITIONS)
SAGS
FIGURE 4.2
EXISTING SYSTEM
STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS
AND FREQUENT MAINTENANCE
CITY OF SOUTH 8AN FRANCISCO
EAST OF HIGHWAY 101
SEWER SYSTEM UASTER PLAN
IlIlII
force main to Pump Station No. 6. Pump Station No. 6 conveys the flows generated within
the study area west of Colma Creek.
4.1.1.3 Forbes-Eccles Subtrunk
The Forbes-Eccles Subtrunk is tributary to the Harbor Way Trunk, and connects to that
trunk at the intersection of East Grand Avenue and Harbor Way. It continues north
(upstream) on Forbes Boulevard with an 8-inch pipe to the intersection with Eccles Avenue.
Thence, the sewer branches eastward along Forbes Blvd and northward along Eccles Ave,
with a3 8-inch pipe, to the intersections with Carlton Court and Rozzi Place, respectively.
4.1.1.4 Gateway Trunk
The Gateway Trunk continues westward (upstream) along East Grand Avenue, with a
21-inch pipe, then jogs northward along Gateway Boulevard. It continues on Gateway
Boulevard with an 18-inch, 15-inch, 12-inch and finally with a 10-inch force main into Pump
Statio3 No. 2. All flows from the Oyster Point subarea are conveyed to Pump Station No. 2.
4.1.1.5 Executive Subtrunk
The Executive Subtrunk is tributary to the Gateway Trunk, and connects to that trunk at the
intersection of East Grand Avenue and Gateway Boulevard. The sewer heads westward
along East Grand Ave, with a 15-inch pipe, to the intersection with Executive drive. It then
jogs to the north with an 18-inch pipe then westerly across the Southern Pacific Railroad
and finally northward along the Project 101 property line with a 6-inch pipe.
4.1.1.6 Oyster Point Subtrunk
The Cyster Point Subtrunk is tributary to the Gateway Trunk, and connects to that trunk at
Pump Station No. 2. The 12-inch sewer continues northward (upstream) along Gateway
Boulevard to the intersection with Oyster Point Boulevard. The sewer continues eastward
along Oyster Point Blvd, with a 10-inch pipe, then an 8-inch pipe, to the intersection with
Gull E: rive.
4.1.1.7 East Grand Trunk
The East Grand Trunk is tributary to the Harbor Way Trunk, and connects to that trunk at
the intersection of East Grand Avenue and Harbor Way. The trunk sewer continues
eastward (upstream) along East Grand Avenue, with an 18-inch pipe. It then turns
southeasterly toward Littlefield Avenue with an 18-inch then a 15-inch pipe. At the
intersection with Littlefield Avenue, two parallel 15-inch pipes continue eastward along East
Granc Avenue.
4-4
Septe'nber 2002
H:\Final~S oSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~04.doc
The sewer on the north side of the street continues for about 600' to the intersection with
Allerton Way. The other continues with a 15-inch then a 12-inch pipe to Kimball Way. At
Kimb¢..ll Way, the subtrunk heads south with a 1 O-inch force main into Pump Station No. 3.
Pump Station No. 3 collects the flow from the southeast portion of the East of Highway 101
subarea.
4.1.1.8 Swift Subtrunk
The Swift Subtrunk is tributary to the East Grand Trunk, and connects to that trunk at Pump
Statio3 No. 3. The sewer jogs southward then eastward (upstream) along Swift Avenue,
with a 15-inch pipe to the intersection with Haskins Way. It then continues with a 15-inch
pipe along the extended alignment of Swift Avenue to the west property line owned by
Fuller O'Brien (Britannia East Grand Project).
4.1.1.9 Allerton Subtrunk
The Allerton Subtrunk begins at the intersection of East Grand Avenue and Allerton Way.
The 15-inch sewer continues to the north along Allerton Way to the intersection with Forbes
Boulevard. It then turns eastward along Forbes Boulevard with a 10-inch force main to
Pump Station No. 8 and Pump Station No. 10. These pump stations convey the flow from
the northeast portion of the East of Highway 101 subarea.
4.1.1.10 Forbes-DNA Subtrunk
The Forbes-DNA Subtrunk is tributary to the Allerton Subtrunk, and connects to that trunk
at Pump Station No. 8. It continues eastward (upstream) along Forbes Boulevard with a
10-inch pipe to the intersection with DNA Way. It then turns southward with a 10-inch then
an 8-i ich pipe to the intersection with Point San Bruno Boulevard and Grandview Drive.
4.1.1.11 Littlefield North Subtrunk
The L'ttlefield North Subtrunk conveys flows to Pump Station No. 3 from parcels to the west
of Kirr ball Way. The subtrunk begins at Pump Station No. 3 and continues westward with
an 8-i ich pipe to the intersection with Littlefield Avenue. It then branches to the north
(upstream) with 280' of 8-inch pipe. It also branches to the south (upstream) with an 8-inch
then & 6-inch to 180' south of Lawrence Avenue.
4.1.1.12 Littlefield South Subtrunk
The L'ttlefield South Subtrunk begins at Pump Station No. 7 and branches upstream to the
west &nd to the northeast. It continues westward with a 10-inch pipe along Littlefield
AvenL e. It then turns northward along Harbor Way with an 8-inch pipe to the property line
440' north of Littlefield Avenue. The trunk also continues northeasterly with a 10-inch pipe
then E.n 8-inch pipe to the intersection with Utah Avenue.
4-5
Septe"nber 2002
H:\Fina~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~04.doc
4.1.2 Pump Stations
The C'ty operates nine sewer pump stations within the study area (Table 4.1 ). Pump
Station No. 4 intercepts almost all of the study area's sanitary sewer flow. The flow is
conveyed through a 21-inch force main to the WQCP. Pump Station No. 7 collects the
remaining flow and transports it to the WQCP through the same 21-inch force main.
Table 4.2 shows historical flows for each pump station. Pump Station No. 5 collects flows
from parcels within the study area boundary and was previously considered in the 1999
Infiltra:ion and Inflow Study performed by Carollo Engineers. For the purposes of this
maste' plan, Pump Station No. 5 is not included in the study area. Thence, the average flow
from the study area in 2001 was 1.6 MGD.
4.2 HYDRAULIC MODEL
Hydra.~lic network analysis is a powerful tool used in sewer collection planning, design,
operation, management, and emergency response. South San Francisco's hydraulic sewer
model is a critical element that was used in evaluating the capacity of the study area's
existir g sewer system and in planning the City's future facilities.
4.2.1 Selected Hydraulic Model
There is an abundance of sewer analysis software in the marketplace today, with a variety
of features and capabilities. The selection of a particular model generally depends on user
preferences, software costs, and the complexity of the sewer system. Hydra Version 6
which was used by Carollo Engineers to assemble the City's hydraulic model, consists of
multip e products that work together to bring a graphical approach to the analysis and
design of sanitary sewer collections systems. The Hydra program includes GIS Master,
which is an AutoCAD "add-on" tool that facilitates the assembly of the hydraulic model.
4.2.2 Elements of the Hydraulic Model
The study area's hydraulic model combines information on the physical and operational
characteristics of the sewer system, and performs calculations to solve a series of
mathematical equations to simulate flows in pipes. Elements comprising the computer
modeling process are: skeletonizing the sewer system, defining pipes and nodes, and
identifying the service areas.
4.2.2.1 Skeletonizing
Skeletonizing is the process by which sewer systems are stripped of pipelines not
consic ered essential for the intended analysis purpose. The purpose of skeletonizing a
system is to develop a model that accurately simulates the hydraulics of the pipelines
collec:ing sanitary sewer flows. At the same time, skeletonizing should reduce the
complexity of the large model, minimizing the time of analysis, and comply with the
limitat ons imposed by the computer program.
4-6
Septe'nber 2002
H :\Finales oS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\04.doc
Table 4.1
Pump
Station No.
2
3
10
14
Existing Pump Stations
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Number
Motor
Location of
HP
Pumps
383 Oyster Pt. Blvd 3 30
Nameplate Firm Total 1997 Average
Run Time
Rating Capacity Maximum
Hours per day
(GPM) (MGD) (MGD) Dry Wot
300 0.86 1.30 3 3
1997 Average 2001
Daily Flow Average
(MGD) Flow
Dry Wet (MGO)
0.05 0.05 0.03
955 Gateway Blvd 2 20 1000 1.44 2.88 4 4 0.24 0.24
195 Kimball Way 3 10/5.6 750/150 2.16 3.2/0.6 4 7 0.04 0.06
249 Harbor Way 2 25/11 2000/700 2.89 5.8/2.0 METER AT
PLANT
1.47 1.70
160 Utah Ave 2 7.5 200 0.29 0.58 3.2 4.1 0.04 0.05
220 Littlefield Ave 2 5 300 0.43 0.86 1.5 1.8 0.03 0.03
701 Forbes Blvd 2 30 990/500 1.43 2.8/1.4 18.2 16.5
0.55 0.50
572 Forbes Blvd 2 20 500 0.72 1.44 2.6 2.4 0.08 0.07
Bay West Cove 2 35 1255 1.81 3.61
Source: City of South San Francisco
Comments/Upgrades
Replace existing pumps
Install variable speed controls
Install standby generator
0.14 Replace existing pumps
Install variable speed controls
Install standby generator
0.11 Replace existing pumps
Install variable speed controls
Install standby generator
Install crane/davit
Raise vent stack
Reconstruct driveway retaining wall
Upgrade electrical service
1.56 Replace existing pumps
Install variable speed controls
Upgrade standby generator
Install crane/davit
Construct Channel Monster grinder
at influent channel
Upgrade electrical service
0.02 Install new motor control center
May require new pump station
structure (2' settlement)
0.03 Replace existing pumps
Install new motor control center
Install standby generator
0.47 Replace existing pumps
Install variable speed controls
Install emergency generator
0.09 Replace existing pumps
Upgrade dry well entrance
Install emergency generator
0.03 Not owned by City
Maintained and Operated by City
On-Line 2001
Table 4.2
Year
Historical Pump Station Flows
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
PS 4(4)
PS 6
FLOWS (mgd)
Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio
Flow To Flow To Flow To Flow To Flow To
(mgd) Average (mgd) Average (mgd) Average (mgd) Average (mgd) Average
3-Year Avg 0.03 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.07 1.00
3-Year Max 0,05 1.64 0.27 1.93 0.24 3.57
3-Year Min 0.02 0.60 0.07 0.50 0,02 0.25
1.57 1.00 0.03 1.00
2.67 1.70 0.04 1.41
0.93 0.59 0.01 0.47
1999 Avg 0.03 1.00 0.15 1.00 0,04 1.00
1999 Max 0.04 1.36 0.27 1.81 0.09 2.04
1999 Min 0.02 0.67 0.07 0.47 0.02 0.40
PS 7
2000 Avg 0.03 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.04 1.00
2000 Max 0.05 1.67 0.18 1.47 0.10 2.29
2000 Min 0.02 0.61 0,07 0.56 0.02 0.55
Flow
(mgd)
PS 8
PS 10 I PS 14
Firm(3) 0.86 1.44 2.16 2.88 0.29 0.43 1.43 0.72 1.81
Total 1.30 2.88 3.24 5.76 0.58 0.86 2.85 1.44 3.61
Notes:
1. Flow data provided by the City and calculated using run time of pumps.
Flow (gpd)=run time(hours)*60*pump rating (gpm)/days between meter readings.
2. Calculated based on 3.5 times Average Day Flow.
3. Firm Capacity is with largest pump out of service.
4. 2001 flows for PS 4 from Cily WQCP records.
CAPACITY (mgd)
2001 Avg 0.03 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.56 1.00 0.02 1.00
2001 Max 0.04 1.38 0.20 1.38 0.24 2.08 2.51 1.61 0.03 1.34
2001 Min 0.02 0.60 0.12 0.84 0.04 0.38 1.04 0.67 0.02 0.65
2001 Peak Hour(2) 0.10 0.50 0.40 5.45 0.08
0.03 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.08 1.00
0.03 1.32 0.05 1.70 1.08 1.86 0.12 1.50
0.01 0.46 0.01 0.28 0.40 0.69 0.06 0.78
0.03 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.03 1.00
0.06 1.69 0.61 1.32 0,13 1,40 0.05 1.78
0.02 0.54 0.33 0.70 0.03 0.38 0.01 0.49
0.12 1.63 0.31 0.11
0.03 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.07 1.00
0.04 1.31 0.07 2.25 1.09 1.61 0.11 1.45
0.02 0.68 0.02 0.61 0.51 0.76 0.05 0.65
0.03 1.00 0,58 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.03 1.00
0.07 2.10 1.09 1.90 0.13 1.57 0.05 t .78
0.01 0.29 0.33 0.57 0.03 0.43 0.01 0.49
Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio
To Flow To Flow To Flow To
Average (mgd) Average (mgd) Average (mgd) Average
BecaLse the study area is relatively small in size and an industrial area, most of the sewer
system pipes east of Highway 101 were included in the hydraulic model. These pipes are
generally 8 inches in diameter and larger and function to convey the wastewater collected
in the City to the WQCP. The modeled trunk system was described in detail in a previous
sectio3 and shown on Figure 4.1.
4.2.2.2 Pipes and Manholes
Comp Jter modeling requires gathering detailed numerical information on the physical
characteristic of the modeled sewer system, such as pipe sizes (diameters), pipe lengths,
pipe irvert elevations at the upstream and downstream manholes, pipe slope, ground
elevat'ons at the manholes, and general system geometry.
Pipes and manholes represent the physical elements describing the sewer system. A
manhole represents a location in the network where a sewer flow can be applied to the
trunk sewer system, while a pipe segment represents an element of the actual collection
system. Additionally, pumps within the skeletonized system are included in the computer
model.
4.2.2.3 Sewer Tributary Areas
AIIoca:ing sewer flows to appropriate locations throughout the trunk system was
accorr plished by defining sewer areas tributary to individual manholes, identifying the areas
(acres) of sewer user groups within each service area, then applying the appropriate
average day demand coefficients to each sewer user group in those areas. Sewer flow
distrib.~tion was performed based on the industry projections, water use metered data and
land use categories generating flows in accordance with the developed average day
demand conditions. These coefficients were defined and discussed in a previous chapter.
4.2.3 Hydraulic Model Calibration
The stJdy area's hydraulic model was calibrated to establish a level of confidence in the
flows that it simulates. The calibrated model serves as an established benchmark for further
analysis and evaluation. Future analysis consisted of modifications to the calibrated model
to sim Jlate other sewer flow patterns or additional facilities.
Calibration is complicated by the fact that some data are known and unchanging, some are
variab e over time, while others are estimated. Pipe and manhole information such as
diame:er, lengths, slopes, and location are known. Flow data obtained from the wastewater
treatment facility records vary with time of day, season, and total number of customers. The
study area's model was calibrated for the average flows experienced during the year 2001.
4-9
September 2002
H:\Final\S 3SFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~04.doc
Chapter 5
EVALUATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
This c'~apter presents the results of the capacity evaluation of the sewer system. The
chapter also presents improvements to mitigate existing system deficiencies and for
servic'ng future redevelopment. These improvements are recommended based on the
system's technical requirements, cost effectiveness, and operational reliability.
5.1 DESIGN FLOWS
Basec on the evaluation criteria discussed in a previous chapter, existing and projected
2020 design flows were simulated to evaluate the capacity adequacy of the existing
collec-ion system. The projected 2020 design flows consist of the buildout conditions east of
Highway 101. The design flows shown in Table 5.1 include dry weather and wet weather
condit'ons.
Table 5.1
Design Flows
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Average Flow
Design Flow Condition (MGD)
Dry Weather Conditions
2001 Dry Weather
2020 Dry Weather
Wet Weather Conditions
2001 Wet Weather
2020 Wet Weather
Peak Hour Flow
(MGD)
1.5 3.4
5.5 12.1
2.5 5.5
6.4 14.1
5.1.1 Dry Weather Conditions
Durinc. existing dry weather conditions, the average flow and peak hour flows within the
study area are 1.5 and 3.4 MGD, respectively. At buildout of the 2020 planning horizon
year, the average and peak hour dry weather flows are anticipated to approach 5.5 and
12.1 MGD, respectively.
5.1.2 Wet Weather Conditions
Evaluating the capacity adequacy of the City's sewer system during wet weather conditions
included applying a hypothetical 5-year 24-hour design storm that increased the infiltration
and in-'lows determined by the hydraulic model.
Should the design storm occur, the hydraulic model projects existing average and peak
hour flows within the study area of 2.5 and 5.5 MGD, respectively. Applying the same storm
5-1
September 2002
H:\Final~S 3SFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~05.doc
event during the buildout condition of the study area results with an average and peak hour
flows of 6.4 and 14.1 MGD, respectively. These projected wet weather flows assume no
mitigation to the current infiltration and inflow rates.
5.2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements discussed in this section are needed to mitigate existing system
capac'ty deficiencies and to provide additional capacity for anticipated future users. The
identif'ed improvements have been assigned a number that is cross-referenced to
Figure 5.1.
· Im3rovement I - Pump Station No. 1
Pump Station No. 1 requires the replacement of three existing centrifugal pumps with
dry well submersible pumps. The pump station also needs variable speed controls and
a standby generator.
· Im 3rovement 2 - Pump Station No. 2
The hydraulic capacity analysis indicates the existing pumps need to be replaced with
larger pumps to handle anticipated future flows. Other station improvements include
provisions for variable speed controls for the pumps and a standby generator.
Im 3rovement 3 - Pump Station No. 3
Pump Station No. 3 requires the replacement of the existing centrifugal pumps with dry
well submersible pumps and the installation of variable speed controls for the pumps.
Other needed station improvements include: the installation of a standby generator, the
installation of a crane/davit for pump and equipment removal, raising the vent stack,
reconstructing the driveway retaining wall, and upgrading the electrical service.
Im 3rovement 4 - Pump Station No. 4
The hydraulic capacity analysis indicates the two existing pumps should be replaced
and two new pumps be added to the station to handle the future firm capacity of
9,(;00 gpm. Other station improvements include: installation of variable speed controls
for the pumps, provision of a standby generator, installation of crane/davit for pump and
eq ~ipment removal, construction of a channel monster grinder at'the influent channel to
the pump station, and an electrical service upgrade.
Im 3rovement 5 - Pump Station No. 6
Pu'np Station No. 6 requires a new motor control center and other miscellaneous
re¢ uired improvements. The pump station has settled approximately 2 feet from the
original construction. Further evaluation is recommended to determine the structural
integrity of the station.
Im 3rovement 6 - Pump Station No. 7
At 3uildout conditions, flows tributary to Pump Station No. 7 increase significantly
rec uiring the replacement of the existing pumps with larger capacity pumps. Other
improvements include the provision of a new motor control center and the installation of
an emergency generator.
Septer~ber 2002
H:\Final~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~05.doc
5-2
t
8" F~
(~AND
N.T.S. ~
LEGEND
i ";' PROPOSED FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENT
PROPOSED PUMP STATION UPGRADE
(~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NUMBER
~' SEE TABLE 6.2 FOR DETAILS
. STUDY AREA BOUNDARY . "~:~. Y""?:%. PS
~MODELED SEWER PIPE & SIZE
""""'~t MODELED FORCE MAIN
EXISTING PUMP STATION & NUMBER . ,s 5
12" PROPOSED SEWER PiPE
IMPROVEMENT & SIZE ..
1(
15
S"~FT ~ SUBTRUN*
WOCP
TTLE, F. IELD
FIGURE §.1
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
CiTY OF 80Ul'H SAN FRANCISCO
F. AST OF HIGHWAY 10t
8EWER SYSTEM MASTER RAN
IItIlIIItl'I
· Im :~rovement 7 - Pump Station No. 8
The capacity analysis indicates that this pump station is deficient and requires a
capacity upgrade to handle anticipated future flows. The pump firm capacity needs to
be upgraded by replacing the two existing pumps with three new pumps. Other needed
improvements include the addition of variable speed controls for the pumps and the
installation of an emergency generator.
· Im ~rovement 8 - Pump Station No. 10
To mitigate the hydraulic deficiency at Pump Station No. 10, the two existing pumps
need to be replaced with two new pumps designed to handle future flows. Other needed
improvements include upgrading the dry well entrance and the addition of an
errergency generator.
· Im =rovement 9 - Force Main Pump Station No. 2
Th's improvement consists of a new 10-inch force main paralleling the existing 10-inch
force main along Gateway Boulevard.
· Improvement 10- Force Main Pump Station No. 4
Th's improvement consists of a new 21-inch force main that parallels the existing
21-inch force main between Pump Station No. 4 and the South San Francisco San
Bruno Water Quality Control Plant.
· Im =rovement 11 - Force Main Pump Station No. 8
Th's improvement consists of a new 1 O-inch force main that parallels the existing
10-inch main along Forbes Boulevard, between Pump Station No. 8 and Allerton Ave.
· Im =rovement 12 - Oyster Point Subtrunk
Th's improvement consists of a new 18-inch pipe to replace the existing 12-inch sewer
that continues northward on Gateway Boulevard from Pump Station No. 2. The portion
that continues eastward along Oyster Point Boulevard from Gateway Boulevard
consists of a new 15-inch pipe that replaces the existing 10-inch and 12-inch sewer. A
new 12-inch pipe is needed to replace the existing 880 feet of 8-inch pipe, which
continues along Oyster Point Boulevard and then jogs southerly along Eccles Avenue.
· Improvement 13- Allerton Subtrunk
The capacity analysis indicates that future flows will exceed the capacity of this trunk
sewer. A new 18-inch pipe is needed to replace the existing 15-inch sewer along
Allerton Way to East Grand Avenue.
· Improvement 14-East Grand Trunk
Th's improvement for the East Grand Trunk consists of a new 27-inch pipe to replace
the existing 18-inch along East Grand Avenue to 150 feet east of Roebling Ave. The
portion that continues southeast along East Grand consists of a new 24-inch pipe to
replace the existing 18-inch, then 15-inch to Littlefield Avenue. From Littlefield, a new
18-inch pipe is needed to replace the 15-inch sewer that exists on the north side of East
Grand to Allerton Way. Finally, a new 21-inch pipe is needed to replace the existing
15-inch pipe that parallels the sewer from Littlefield Avenue to Allerton Way.
September 2002
H:\Final\SoSFO_FNO\6399AO0\Rpt~05.doc
5-4
· In. provement 15 - Forbes - DNA Subtrunk
TI' e existing I O-inch pipe along Forbes Boulevard from Kaufmann Court to 300 feet
west of DNA Way needs to be replaced with a new 12-inch sewer. The smaller reach
along DNA Way, from the Southern Pacific Railroad alignment to 530 feet north of
Grandview Drive, consists of a new 10-inch pipe to replace the existing 8-inch.
· Irt provement 16 - Swift Subtrunk
Anticipated future flows will require the replacement of this existing 15-inch trunk sewer
along Swift Avenue. Poor soil conditions along the alignment of this sewer have caused
sags along the Swift Subtrunk, resulting with a reduced capacity. This trunk currently
h;-ndles existing flows, but requires replacement when additional users are added. The
proposed improvement consists of a new 15-inch pipe to replace the existing 15-inch
sewer terminating at Pump Station No. 3.
· In. provement 17 - Littlefield North Subtrunk
TI-is improvement consists of a new 8-inch pipe to replace the existing 8-inch pipe
which is experiencing settlement along Littlefield Avenue, west of Pump Station No. 3.
· In. provement 18 - Littlefield South Subtrunk
TI-is improvement consists of a new 1 O-inch then an 8-inch pipe to replace the existing
I C- and 8-inch pipes, respectively. It is reported that portions of the subtrunk sags,
possibly the result of poor soil conditions.
· In. provement 19 - Executive Subtrunk
As a result of root intrusion, the existing 18-inch pipe along Executive Drive needs to be
replaced. The analysis indicates that new pipe size can be reduced to 15-inches in
diameter.
· Irrprovement 20- Harbor Way Subtrunk
TI-is improvement consists of replacing the existing 8-inch sewer along Harbor Way
wi~h a new I O-inch pipe from Utah Avenue to approximately 80 feet north of Mitchell
Avenue.
5-5
Septe ~ber 2002
H:\Finar~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~05.doc
water planning and engineering community to adjust cost estimates developed in different
years. The costs estimated for facilities with this study are in 2001 dollars, based on an
ENR CCI for San Francisco of 7400 (December 2001 ).
6.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Capital Improvement Program for the improvements identified by this master plan are
presented in Table 6.2. Care was taken to explain each column in the previous chapter;
additional cost-related explanations are provided herein.
6.2.1 Baseline Construction Cost
This is the total estimated construction cost, in dollars, of the proposed improvement: pipes
and pump stations. Pipe Baseline Construction Costs were developed using the following
criteria:
· ~ipe Unit Cost: Estimated unit cost of pipeline is based on the pipe's present day cost
'n addition to installation cost, new pavement or pavement restoration, traffic control,
bore- and-jack installation (where applicable), and appurtenance such as valves and
'ire hydrants, mobilization and demobilization, and contractor's overhead and profit.
The cost is expressed in dollars per linear foot ($/LF) of pipe length. In the case of
jacked steel casings, the unit cost includes the carrier pipe inside the casing.
· ~ipe Cost: Estimated cost of the pipeline, calculated by multiplying the estimated
length by the unit cost, in dollars.
· Other Infrastructure Facilities Costs: Estimated lump sum costs, in dollars, for the
construction of pump stations.
6.2.2 Estimated Construction Cost
Since <nowledge about site-specific conditions of each proposed project is. limited at the
maste' planning stage, a 30 percent contingency was applied to the Baseline Construction
Cost to account for unforeseen events and unknown conditions.
The Estimated Construction Cost, in dollars, for the proposed improvement consists of the
Baseli 3e Construction Cost plus the construction contingency.
6.2.3 Capital Improvement Cost
Other 3roject-related costs have been identified and estimated at 50 percent of the
Estimr-ted Construction Costs. These costs include engineering, administration,
constr Jction inspection, and legal costs.
The Capital Improvement Cost, in dollars, for each proposed improvement is the total of the
Estim&ted Construction Cost (including contingency) plus the other costs discussed in the
previo Js paragraph.
6-3
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~06.doc
6.2.4 AB 1600 Provisions
Utility 'ates and connection fees are collected to pay off debt financing, to fund capital
improvements and to pay operations and maintenance costs. Connection fees are charges,
imposed by local agencies on new developments, for recovering the capital costs of public
facilities needed to service those developments. These fees and charges must satisfy the
provisions of California Government Code Section 66000, which went into effect on
Janua'y 1, 1989. These provisions, for water and sewer connection fees, are also known as
AB16¢0 provisions, referring to Assembly Bill 1600 that introduced the provision. The
provisions, as they relate to water and sewer connection fees, dictate that the ".... charges
do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or
charge is imposed..."
The irt provements in this master plan have been classified into two categories:
· Services benefiting existing development.
· Services necessitated by or benefiting new development.
An opi 3ion of benefit to future users, based on preliminary project information, was included
in this master plan. Once estimates for specific projects are completed, a more precise
allocation may be performed if required by the provisions of the California Government
Code Section 66000 and AB 1600.
New development is defined as any land use change or construction that takes place after
the fur ding procedures recommended in this plan are adopted. Existing development
includes properties where no new construction or redevelopment occurs. Due to state law
and political realities, the funding and financing options available differ somewhat for these
two categories.
6-4
Septer~ber 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt\06.doc
Number Priority(~) and
PUMP STATIONS
I 3 Pump Station No. 1
PS1-3
PS2-1
PS3-2
4 1 Pump Station No. 4
PS6-3
6 3 Pump Station No. 7
PS7-3
PS8-1
PS10-2
PIPELINES (PRESSURE AND GRAVITY)
9 3 Force Main.Pump Station NO. 2
10 3 Furce Main-Pump Station No. 4
FMPS4-3 Pipe
FMPS4-3 Bo~e & JacldCeaing
12 3 Oystar Point Trunk
OP-3 Pipe
OP-3 Pipe
13 3 Allertml Trunk
14 2 East Grand Trunk
16 2 Swift Subtrunk
Way
Table 6.2 Capital Improvement Program
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Improvement Name/Type Street Project Limits
Pump Station Up~ade(21 Oyster Point Blvd Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgrade12~ Gateway Blvd Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgrade(21 Kimbell Way
Pump Station Upgrade<z} Harbar Way
Pump Station Upgrabe(2~ Utah Ave
Existing Pump Station Structure
Existing Pump Station Structure
Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Up~'ade(a Littlefield Ave Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgrade(~ 701 F(xpes Blvd Existing Pump Station Structure
Pump Station Upgrade(;~1 572 Farbes Blvd Existing Pump Station Structure
Gateway Blvd P.S. 2 lo 835' s/o P.S.
SPRR Alignment P.S. 4 to WQCP
SPRR Alignment Crossing Navigabie Slough
WQCP PropertyFM on WOCP Ixoparty and tie in
Forbes Blvd P.S. 8 to Alle{ton Ave
Ecclas Avenue240' s/o Oyster Point Blvd to 640' w/o Eccles
Oyster Point Blvd 640' w/o Eccles to Gateway Blvd
Gateway Blvd Oyster Point Bird lo Pump Station No. 2
Allerton Ave/East ( Forbes Bivd to Littlefield Ave
Allerton Ave Crossing Railroad
East Grand Ave Allelton Ave to Littlefield Ave
Easl Grand Ave LiUlelield Ave to 150' e/o Roebling Ave
East Gland Ave 150' e/o Roebiing Ave to Harbor Way
DNA Way 530' n/o Grandview Ave 1o SPRR Alignment
F(xbos Blvd 300' w/o DNA Way to 90' e/o Kaufmann Ct
Swift Ave 290' s/o East Grand (at RR Spur) to PS 3
Littletield Ave s/o SPTCo To 190' s/o Lawrence Ave
Littlefield Ave Utah Ave to 550, e/o Utah Ave
Littielield Ave 550' s/o Utah Ave to SPTCo AJignmenl
Executive Drive East Grand to 1015' ne/o East Grand
Harbor Way Utah Ave Io 80' n/o Mitchell Ave
NOTES:
Consli'~ction Priority~ 1 = Short-Term Improvement 2 = Intermediate-Term ImD~-ovemenl
3 = Long-Term Improvement
2 Costs I~ Pump Station projects are besed on a p~eliminary site survey completed August 2002
Up~ades al Pump Station No 14 are Ihe responsibility ol the owner/developer City Staff maintain the station.
4 ENR = 7.400.
H \Client\SoSFO_FNO~6399A00~Costs\CIP-090902
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT COSTS
ExistingExistingExisting Proposed ProposedProposed
ExistingExisting Firm Total Pumps/Pipe Proposed ParallelFirm Total Pumps/Pipe Unit 9aseline Estimated Total
Size Length CapacityCapacity Peak Flows Size or CapacityCapacityPeak Flows Cost Cost ConstructionCost
(in) (It) (gpm) (gpm) (mgd) (in) Replace(gpm) (gpm) (mgd) ($) ($) ($) ($)
600 900 3x300 Replace 600 900 3x300 198,462 258,000 387,000
Project Total
1000 2000 2x1000 Replace 2400 3400 1x1000, 2x1200 738,462 960,000 1,440,000
Project Total
1500 2250 3x750 Replace 1500 2250 3x750 67,692 114,000 171,0(30
Project Total
2000 4000 2x2000 Replace 90(X) 12000 4x3000 1,306,154 1,698,000 21547,000
Project Total
200 400 2x200 Replace 200 400 2x200 87,692 1 t 4,000 17t,000
Project Total
300 600 2x300 Replace 800 . 1600 2x800 729,231 948,000 1,422,000
Pro,ct Total
990 1980 2x990 Replace 1400 2100 3x700 572,308 744,000 1,116,000
Prc~ct Total
500 1000 2x500 Replace 750 1500 2x750 752,308 978,000 1,467,000
Project Total
10
21
21
21
10
8
10/12
12
15
15
15
15
18
8
10
15
8
8
10
16
8
835
2815
200
750
2750
880
1615
155
2825
100
330
1190
740
215
565
3195
t000
550
8O5
1015
980
0.65 10 Parallel 329
554 21 Parallel 12.89
36(21 )Parailel
21
1.51 10 Parallel 2.00
0.39 12 Replace 1 84
049 15 Replace 308
065 18 Replace 3.28
2 26 18 Replace 4.17
32(18) Replace
0.78 21 Replace 1.84
3.05 24 Replace 6 70
3 13 27 Replace 6.85
0 97 10 Replace t.44
1.00 12 Repleco 1.54
043 15 Replace 0.79
0.19 8 Replace
012 8 Replace 012
018 t0 Replace 095
0 22 15 Raplace 0.22
043 10 Replace 043
150 132,821 172,667 259,000
Project Total
300 894,872 1.163,333 1,745,000
1,750 370,769 482.,000723,000
300 23e,462 310,000 465,000
Project Total
150 436,923 568,000 852,000
Prl:~ct Total
200 186.667 242,667 364.000
250 427,692 556,000 834.000
300 49,231 64,000 96,000
Project Total
300 897,949 1,167,333 1,75t.000
1,100 lt6,410 151,333 227,000
Project Total
350 122,564 159,333 239,000
350 441,026 573,333 860,000
400 313,846 408.000 612,000
Project Total
175 40,000 52,000 78,000
200 119,487 155,333 233,000
Project Total
250 846,154 1,100,000 1,650,000
Project Total
150 158,974 206,667 310,000
Project Total
150 87,692 114,000 171,000
175 149.231 194,000 291,000
Project Total
250 268,718 349,333 524,000
Project Total
175 1811538 236,000 354,000
Project Total
Total Cost
Project
Total
($)
387,000
1,440,000
171,000
2,547,000
171,000
1,422,000
1,116,000
1,467,000
259,000
2,933,000
652,000
t ,294,000
t .978,000
1,711,000
311,000
1,650.000
310,000
462,000
524,000
354.000
21,359,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDED FINANCING
Short Intermediate Long Future Future Existing
Term Term Term Users Users Users
Improvement iimprovements Improvements Benefit Cost Cost
(s) (s) (s) (%) (s) (s)
387,000 0% 0 387,000
1,440,000 85% 1,224,000 216,000
171,000 80% 136,800 34,200
2,547,000 60% 1,528,200 1,018,800
171,000 0% 0 171,000
1,422,000 80% 1,137,600 284,400
1,116,000 100% 1,116,000 0
1,467,000 60% 880,200 586,800
259,000 0
259,000 100%
852,000
2,933,000 100% 2,933,000 0
100% 852,000 0
1.294,000 80% 1,035,200 258,800
1,978,000 50% 989,000 989,000
5,955,0OO
1,711,000 60% 11026,600 684,400
311,000 100% 311,000 0
98% 1,617,000 33,000
1,650,000
310,000 30% 93,000 217,000
462,000 80% 369,600 92,400
524,000 0% 0 524,000
354,000 0% 0 354,000
5,664,000 9,740,000 15,508,200 5,850,800
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX A- MAJOR PROJECTS
Septe 'nber 2002
H :\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\R pt\APP.cloc
MAJOR PROJECTS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
October 2001
For Current Updates Contact the Planning Division
PH: (650) 877-8535 FAX: (650) 829-6639
webpage: www.ssf, net email: web-ecd@ci.ssf, ca.us
OFFICE/R&D PROJECTS
Case Number
UP 99-065
ND 99-065
UP 99-068
ND 99-068
Project Name Address/ Proposed Use
Location (Gross Sq. Ft.)
Trammel Crow 335 Oyster R&D
Point 2 Buildings
Boulevard 107,960 SF
5.41 Acre Site
Celera (AXYS 180 Kimball R&D
Pharmaceuticals) Way 3-Stories
63,550 SF
1.6 Acre Site
UP 99-036 Scanwell
International
333 Victory Office Expansion
Avenue 5,890 SF
6.1 Acre Site
Developer
Dean Givas
(650) 578-8100
Celera (AXYS
Pharmaceuticals)
180 Kimball Way
SSF, CA 94080
(650) 829-1001
Dennis C.S. Yeung
Best Design
100 Old County Rd.
#100C, Brisbane, CA
94005
(415) 656-3528
Current Status
Nearing Completion
Complete
Applied for Time
Extension
(MUP-99-036)
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 1 afl9 Planning Division, October 2001
Case Number
Project Name
UP 00-023 Zymed
Laboratories
UP 00-024 Project 101
ND 00-024
Address/
Location
561-571 Eccles
Avenue
600-790
Dubuque
Avenue
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Fl.)
Conversion from
Manu facturing/Warehous
e Io R&D
36,400 SF
2.1 Acre Site
Master Plan Conversion
from Warehouse to Office
236,300 SF
10.9 Acre Site
UP 00-014 Smhlmuller 180 Oyster Office 5-Stories
ND 00-014 Property Co. Point 105,000 SF
Boulevard Garage - 4 Stories
2.35 Acre Site
UP 00-074 Malcolm Office 200 Oyster Office 6-Stories
VAR 00-074 Building Point 155,000 SF
ND 00-074 Boulevard Garage 4- Stories
3.54 Acre Site
Canal Street, LTD
401 & 425 'So.
Canal Street
UP 00-076
ND 00-076
Office 25,000 SF
(Two 12,483 SF Bldgs)
1.51 Acre Site
Developer
Zymed Laboratories
458 Carlton Ct., SSF,
CA 94080
(650) 871-4494
]ntereal
David Bressie
520 3ra St., #555, SF,
CA 94107
(415) 778-3900
Roger C. Stuhlmuller
Stuhlmuller Property
4055 Bohannon Dr.,
Menlo Park, CA
94025
(650) 321-5900
John Malcolm
200 Oyster Point
Blvd., SSF, CA
94080
(415) 778-3900
Wall Street
Properties
Victor Catanzaro
2477 Flores St., San
Mateo, CA 94403
(650) 574-1000
Current Status
Phase 1 Complete
Under Review
Under Review
Under Review
Approved
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 2 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
PUD 01-006
UP 01-006
EIR 01-006
UP 00-006
VAR 00-006
ND 00-006
Britannia East
Grand
Giorgi Furniture
UP 00-022 Intrinsic Shaw
ND 00-022 Road
UP 00-054
Pain Therapeutics
Easterly
Terminus of
East Grand
Avenue
211 Baden
Avenue
225 Shaxv Road
416 Browning
Way
Office/R&D 785,000 SF
Childcare 8,000 SF
Fitness Center 5,000 SF
Rest./Retail 8,000 SF
2 5/6 Level Garage
Retail
44,500 SF
1.0 Acre site
Conversion of Warehouse
to Office
2 Stories
60,792 SF
3 Acre Site
Conversion of Warehouse
to Office
10,000 SF
0.5 Acre Site
Slough Estates/Bill
Rogalla
53 West Monroe St.,
Suite 2000, Chicago,
IL 60603
(312) 558-9100
Robert Giorgi
Giorgi Furniture
211 Baden Ave.,
SSF, CA 94080
(650) 588-4621
Michael L. Tevis
225'Shaw Rd., SSF,
CA 94080
(650) 233-1501
Pain Therapeutics,
Inc.
Remi Barbier
250 E. Grand Ave.
#70, SSF, CA 94080
(650) 624-8200
Under Review
Nearing Complction
Under Construction
Complete
UP-01-032
ND-01-032
Cell Genesys
500 Forbes
Boulevard
154,000 SF
2 Floors
6.774 Acres
Drawbridge Forbes
LLC, 2483 West
Bayshore, Suite 102
Palo Alto, CA 94303
(650) 812-9806
Under Review
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 3 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
UP-01-033 Sand Hill Land
ND-01-033 Company
UP-01-034
ND-01-034
Sand Hill Property
Company
)
7 South Linden
Avenue
345 East Grand
Avenue
110,000 SF
2 Floors
4.22 Acres
200,000 SF
2 Floors
6 Level Garage
Conversion of Existing
Bldg.
5.76 Acres
Sand Hill Land
Company
Albert R. Hill, Jr.
220 State Street, Ste.
219, Los Altos, CA
94022
(650) 917-8881
Sand Hill Property
Company
John Tze, 30 East
Fourth Ave., San
Mateo, CA 94401
(650) 344-1500
Under Review
Under Review
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 4 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
BRITANNIA POINTE GRAND BUSINESS PARK
Case Number Project Name Address/
Location
PUD 98-053/MOD 1
ND 98-053/MOD 1
UP 99-053/MOD 2
Britannia Pointe East Grand
Grand Business Avenue/Harbor
Park Way
SUGEN Expansion
Phase II
SUGEN Expansion
Phase III
Exelixis 1
Exelixis II
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
Office/R&D
3 Buildings
167,000 SF
8.3 Acre Site
Expansion of an Existing
20.3 Acre Business Park
as follows:
2-story Headquarters
49,000 SF
2-story Headquarters
48,391 SF
R&D
70,000 SF
R&D
49,OO0 SF
Developer
Britannia
Bob Bristow
1939 Harrison St.,
Ste. 715, Oakland,
CA 94612
(510) 834-7116
Current Status
Complete
Approved
Complete
Complete
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 5 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT
Case Number
Project Name
Address/
Location
PP 00-0,10 Holiday Inn 550 Gatexvay
Express Blvd.
PP 97-063 &
PP 97-063/MOD 1
PP 97-063/MOD2
PP-97-063/MOD3
PP 97-062/MOD I
ND 97-062/MOD 1
Lot 9 Gateway
Gateway
Technology Center/
Coulter
Pharmaceuticals
Britannia
Technology Center
PP 96-088
701-951
Gateway
Boulevard
600-650
Gateway
Boulevard
201 Gateway
225 Gateway
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
1 ,l 5 Rooms
2.0 Acre Site
Bldg. I: 710 Gateway -
176,000 SF Office
Bldg. II: 901 Gateway -
110,000 SF R&D
(Advanced Medicine)
Bldg. III: 801 Gateway -
139,050 SF Office/R&D
Bldg. IV: 951 Gateway -
60,000 SF Office/R&D
(Advanced Medicine)
15.0 Acre Site
Office/R&D
3 Bldgs
150,000 SF
7.85 Acre Site
225 Gateway - 60,000 SF
Office/R&D
201 Gateway - 43,000 SF
Office/R&D
6.07 acre site
Developer
Vijay Patel
SRI Krishnu
Enterprises, 300
Gateway, SSF, CA
94080
(650)366-2000
Hines
Lisa Burke
101 Calif. St. #1000
SF, CA 94111
(650) 794-1111
Hines
Lisa Burke
(same as above)
(650) 794-1111
Bob Bristow
1939 Harrison St.,
Ste. 715, Oakland,
CA 94612
(510) 834-7116
Current Status
Approved
Bldg. I - Complete
Bldg. II - Complete
Bldg. III - Complete
Bldg. IV - Under
Construction
Bldg. I - Complete
Bldg. II - Complete
Bldg. III - Under
Construction
225 Gateway -
Complete
201 Gateway-
Complete
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 6 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
Case Number Project Name
PP 00-020 611 & 681
Gateway
Address/
Location
611 & 681
Gateway Blvd.
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
2 Office Bldgs: 611
Gateway - 1 l-Story
(265,081 SF) & 681
Gateway - 4-Story
(124,425 SI~); 6 level
parking garage
8.2 Acre Site
}
Developer
Boston Properties
Bob Pester
4 Embarcadero
Center, LI-#1
SF, CA 94111
(415) 772-0665
Current Status
611 Gateway -
Under Construction
garage- Under
Construction
681 - Building
Permit Under
Review
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 7 of 19 Plannh~g Division, October 2001
GENENTECH CAMPUS
Case No.
UP 93-940/MOD 1
ND 93-940/MODI
UP 99-080
ND 99-080
UP 98-092
ND 98-092
UP 00-007
ND 00-007
UP 00-064
MND 00-064
Project Name
Genentech
l~uilding 7
Addition
Genentech
Building 6
Genentech
Building 26
Genentech
Building 22
Genentech
Founderl3s
Research Center II
Address/
Location
700 Forbes
Boulevard
700 Forbes
Boulevard
1526
Grandview
Drive
632 Forbes
Boulevard
390 DNA Way
Proposed Use
(Gross sq. ft.)
Process Science Center
90,000 SI~'
4.1 Acre Site
Office/Manufacturing
120,000 SF
1.10 Acre Site
Office
112,818 SF
13.53 Acre Site
Garage
491 Spaces, 5-Levels
5.0 Acre Site
R&D, Office & Lab space
in 3, 4-Story buildings
(Buildings 13, 14 & 15)
totaling 287,444 square
feet
17.0 Acre Site
Developer
Genentech
Peter Yee
1 DNA Way
SSF, CA 94O80
(650) 225-3926
Genentech
Peter Yee
(same as above)
(650) 225-3926
Genentech
Peter Yee
(same as above)
(650) 225-3926
Genentech
Peter Yee
(same as above)
(650) 225-3926
Genentech
Peter Yee
(same as above)
(650) 225-3926
Current Status
Completed
Under Construction
Completed
Completed
Under Building
Permit Review
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 8 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
Case No. Project Name
UP 98-084 Costco
EIR 98-084
UP,GP,ZA 99-027 Aegis Assisted
ND 99-027 Living
PM 99-027
UP-O1-045
ND-01-045
Bally Total Fitness
Address/
Location
1556 E1Camino
Real
2280 Gellert
Boulevard
180 E1 Camino
Real
UP 00-045 Peninsula 205 Kenwood
ND 00-045 Nephrology Way
UP 01-051 Telco
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco
245 South
Spruce Avenue
Proposed Use
(Gross sq. ft.)
Retail and Gas Station
147,000 SF
15.0 Acre Site
71-Room Elderly
Residential Care
1.0 Acre Site
40,000 SF
Conversion of Existing
Retail Space to Recreation
Conversion of Retail to
Medical Clinic
9,800 SF
Brentwood Shopping
Center
134,500 SF Warehouse
Conversion into lnternet
Page 9 of 19
Developer
Curreut Status
Peter Clement Complete
Mulvaney Pastnership
Architects, 11820
Northrup Way
#E3000, Bellevue,
WA 98005
(425) 602-4909
Aegis
Steve McCullough
220 Concourse Blvd.
Santa Rosa, CA
95403
(707) 535-3200
Bally Total Fitness
David Holey
12440 East Imperial
Highway #300,
Norwalk, CA 90650-
9998
(562) 484-2825
Peninsula
Nephrology, Inc.
Janet C. Anderson
2000 So. El Camino
Real, San Mateo, CA
94403
(650) 377-0200
South City Industrial
Company, LLC., attn:
Planning Division, October 2001
Under Construction
Under Review
Under Construction
Under Review
Case No.
ND 01-051
Project Name
Address/
Location
Spruce Avenue
Proposed Use
(Gross sq. ft.)
Telecommunications
Facility with 24-hour
Operations
Developer
Tracey Brownfield
1001 Bridgeway #246
Sausalito, CA 94965
Current Status
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 10 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I ! I I
] ERRABAY SPECIFIC PLAN (PHASE II/III)
Case Number Project Name Address/
Location
SP-01-018 Terrabay Specific
Plan Phase II/III
Wesl side of
U.S. 101, North
of Hillside
Blvd.
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
Final Te~rabay Specific Plan
approved February 2001 to
allow (1)A Preservation
Parcel consisting of 25.73
acres, designated as open
space to preserve the
archaeological site, wetlands
and butterfly habitat (2) A
2.68 acre "Buffer Parcel"
south of the Preservation
Parcel, designated
commercial for landscaping
, kiosk, and surface parking;
(3) An 18-acre parcel
designated commercial for a
665,000 sq. fi. office tower
with related parking and
support retail uses on the
ground floor and a day care
and performing arts center
adjacent to and south of the
Buffer Parcel;(4) A 14.96
parcel, designated residential
for a 112 unit residential
tower and 70 units of
attached housing west of the
"Point Area" and (5) A 6.33
acre parcel designated
recreation/open space, for a
recreation/day care facility
Developer
Myers Development
Corp.
David Lukes
101 2~a St. #555
SF, CA 94105
(415) 777-3330
Current Stalus
Requesting
modification to the
Zoning Ordinance
and minor
modification to the
Specific Plan.
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 11 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
Case Number
PP 00-060/MOD 1
PP-01-013
PP 00-063
Project Name Address/
Location
Hines - Bay West 105-185 Oyster
Cove Pt. Blvd
Oyster Point
Marriott
Britannia
Technology Center
- Bay West Cove
195 Oyster
Point Blvd.
NE corner
Oyster Pt. And
Veterans Blvds
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
One 9-story 223,354 SF
office bldg,, three 4-story
R&D bldgs totaling
388,622 SF, 20,000 SF
restaurant/retail, and a
5-level parking garage.
Approx. 16 acre site
350 room, 20-story full
service hotel -4.0 acre site
6 office/R&D buildings
totaling 563,500 SF and
6-level parking garage
Approx. 20 acre site
Developer
Hines - Lisa Burke
I01 Calif. St. #1000,
SF., CA 94111
(415) 982-6200
Western International
Michael Mahoney
12850 Sparling Rd.
#114, Dallas, TX
75230 (972)934-8699
Slough Estates - Bill
Rogalla, 33 West
Monroe St., Ste. 2000
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 558-9100
Current Status
Approved
Approved
Approved;
1100 Veterans
(98,184 SF) - Under
Construction
1120 Veterans
(80,000 SF) - Under
Construction
Parking Garage -
Under Construction
Major Projects in the City. of South San Francisco Page 13 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
OYSTER POINT MARINA SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT
PP 96-079 Oyster Point
Marina Resort
Marina Way &
Oyster Point
Blvd. on the
San Francisco
Bay
Hotel 102 Rooms
Office 14,000 SF
Conference 3,000 SF
Restaurant 8,500 SF
5.0 Acre Site
King Ventures
Dave Watson
290 Pismo St.
San Luis Obispo, CA
93401
(805) 544-4444
Approved
Phase I Hotel and
Office.
Office in Plan
Check
Case Number
Project Name
Address/Location
OPUS/SIERRA POINT:OFFICE/BIOTECH CENTER
Proposed Use
(Gross Sq. Ft.)
Developer
Current Status
PUD 98-044
ND 98-044
PM 98-044
PUD 98-044/MOD
1
Opus/Sierra Point
Opus/Sierra Point
5000 - 7000
Shoreline Court
4000 Shoreline
Court
Office
3 Bldgs, 3-Stories
420,000 SF (140,000 SF
each)
Office
4-Stories, 67,806 SF over
garage
26.0 acre site overall
Opus
Randy Ackerman
6160 Stoneridge Mall
Rd. #360, Pleasanton,
CA 94588
(925) 463-9254
Opus
Randy Ackerman
(same as above)
(925) 463-9254
5000 Shoreline Ct -
Complete
6000 Shoreline Ct.-
Under Construction
7000 Shoreline Ct.
Nearing Completion
Under Construction
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 14 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
I I I I ] I I 1 [ t I I I I 1 I I 1 I
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Case No.
UP 85-723/MOD 1
SA 85-89
UP 85-724/MOD 1
SA 85-90
GP-98-004
RZ-98-004
SA-98-004
PUD-98-004
ND-98-004
PUD 98-O54
SA 98-054
ND 98-054
PUD 99-067
SA 99-O67
EIR 99-067
Project Name
Carter Park I
Westborough Ct.
(Formerly Carter
Park II)
ParcPlace
Oakmont Vistas
Oak Farms
Address/ Proposed Use
Location (Gross sq. ft.)
3721-3741
Carter Drive
3851-3893
Carter Drive
10 W. Orange
Ave./Railroad
Ave.
Oakmont Drive
& Westborough
Boulevard
SE Corner of
Oak and Grand
Avenues
50 Units Planned
Residential Condos
2.0 Acre Site
85 Condos
Two Phases
4.0 Acre Site
153 SFR Dwellings
18.9 Acre Site
33 SFR Dwellings
5.0 Acre Site
Vacant
4.9 Acre Site
32 SFR Dwellings
2.65 Acre Site
Developer
Westborough Court
Partners
Westborough Court
Partners
Summerhill Homes
Dave Egan
777 Calif. Ave., Palo
Alto, CA 94304
(650) 857-0122
Pacific States Capital
John Hansen
661 Live Oak Ave.,
Ste.3, Menlo Park,
CA 94025
(650) 326-3301
Standard Builders
Robert Kent, 1900
O'Farrell St.//305,
San Mateo, CA
94403
(650) 345-7722
Current S1atus
Vesting Tentative
Map
Use Permit
Approved
Phase I and Phase II
Complete
Complete
Approved
Approved
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 15 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
TERRABAY SPECIFIC PLAN {PHASES I & II}
PP 88-18
Same As Above
Same As Above
SP-01-018
Terrabay overall
residential build-
out plan
Terrabay Village
(Phase I)
Terrabay Park
(Phase I)
Terrabay Woods
(Phase II)
North side
Hillside Blvd.
Same As Above
Same As Above
No. side of
Sister Cities
Blvd.
SFR, Townhome, and
Condominiums
10.5 Acre Site
161 Townhomes
125 Unit SFR
135 Unit SFR
Myers Development
Corp., 101 2nd St.,
//555
David Lukes
SF, CA 94105
(415) 777-3330
Same As Above
Same As Above
Myers Development
Corp.
Same As Above
(415) 777-3330
Specific Plan
Approved
Complete
Complete
Approved and
Under Construction
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 17 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
HOTEL PROJECTS
Case No. Project Name.
Address/ Proposed Use
Location (Gross sq. ft.)
Developer
PP 96-079 Oyster Point Marina Way & 102 Rooms King Ventures
Marina Resort Oyster Point 8.0 Acre Site Dave Watson
Blvd. on the 290 Pismo St., San
San Francisco Luis Obispo, CA
Bay. 93401
(805) 544-4444
PUD 96-058 Airport Plaza Inn 721 Airport 45 Rooms Ramen Patel
Blvd. 15,000 SF Site Shyam Lodging
31 Airport Blvd., Ste.
H, SSF, CA 94080
(650) 588-9422
PP-01-013 Oyster Point 195 Oyster Pt. 350 room, 20 story, full Western International
Marriott Blvd. service hotel Michael Mahoney
4.0 Acre Site 12850 Sparling Rd.,
#114, Dallas, TX
75230
(972) 934-8699
PP 00-040 Holiday Inn 550 Gateway 145 Rooms Vijay Patel
Express Blvd. 2.0 Acre Site SRI Krishnu
Enterprises, 300
Gateway, SSF, CA
94080
(650)366-2000
Current Status
Approved
Complete
Approved
Approved
Major Projects in the CiO, of South San Francisco Page 18 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
Case No.
PP 98-007
PP 98-008
PUD & UP 97-089
I I I
Project Name Address/
Location
Marriott Residence Bay West Cove
Inn 1350 Veterans
Blvd.
Marriott Courtyard
Sheraton Four
Points
UP 99-038 Wingate Inn
ND 99-038
UP 99-047 DoubleTree
ND 99-047 (formerly Clarion
Inn)
Bay West Cove
1300 Veterans
Blvd.
264 South
Airport Blvd.
373 South
Airport
Boulevard
127 Harris
Avenue
I
Proposed Use
(Gross sq. ft.)
152 Rooms
3.62 Acre Site
198 Rooms
4.18 Acre Site
101 Rooms
Garage 2-Levels
0.74 Acre Site
87 Rooms
1.0 Acre Site
106 Rooms
1.47 Acre Site
I
Developer
Marriott Intl.
Joy Berry
3130 So. Harbor
Blvd., 1/350, Santa
Ana, CA 92740
(714) 445-3670
Marriott Intl.
Joy Berry
(same as above)
(714) 445-3670
Jay Singh
264 So. Airport Blvd.
SSF, CA 94080
(650) 349-8050
Thakor Desai
3993 Oleander Court
Castro Valley, CA
94546
(510) 889-9154
Raman Patel
Shyam Lodging
31 Airport Blvd., Ste.
H, SSF, CA 94080
(650) 588-9422
Current Status
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Building Permit
Pending
Major Projects in the City of South San Francisco Page 19 of 19 Planning Division, October 2001
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX B - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SAN BRUNO
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT HISTORY
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~APP.doC
2001 South San Francisco San Bruno Sewage Treatment Plant Data
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 AIX-01 May-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01
DAILY DAILY DAILY DAILY DALLY DALLY DAILY DALLY DALLY DAILY DAILY DAILY
FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW
DAY (mga') (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mga') (mgd) (mgcl) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
1 1.1766 1.6932 1.908 1.1012 1.6046 1.5095 1.1807 1.6398 1.2573 1,7129 1.5807 1.6777
2 1.5212 1.6956 2.3008 1.5484 1.6613 1.1777 1.5671 1.6465 1.1859 1.6304 1.5692 2.3576
3 1.5808 1.3600 1.6198 1.6236 1.7047 1.1348 1.6249 1.6575 1.2290 1.6214 1.2516 1.9964
4 1.5835 1.259 1.7344 1.5995 1.5691 1.5549 1.1829 1.3838 1.5773 1.6460 1.1798 1.8791
5 1.6314 1.7275 2.0251 1.6035 1.2470 1.5999 1.5582 1.2584 1.5780 1.6042 1.6234 1.9001
6 1.2559 1.7056 2.0228 1.6646 1.2266 1.5886 1.6602 1.61 09 1.6222 1.2646 1.7530 1.8979
7 1.1775 1.7455 1.9283 1.2361 1.5923 1.61 51 1.3272 1.71 47 1.5381 1.2211 1.6869 1.791 2
8 1.7712 1.7798 1.8644 1.1658 1.6265 1.5895 1.3419 1.7094 1.6255 1.5581 1.6492 1.4536
9 1.7533 1.8977 1.7910 1.6944 1.6721 1.2390 1.6314 1.6701 1.2198 1.6404 1.5798 1.3534
lO 2.0639 1.6834 1.4837 1.6500 1.6615 1.1262 1.5940 1.6388 1.6427 1.5561 1.3013 1.6798
11 2.2638 1.81 22 1.4528 1.6665 1.6945 1.5310 1.6685 1.3322 1.5607 1.581 9 1.1780 1.7047
12 1.9713 2.2094 1.8167 1.5053 1.2176 1.5342 1.628 1.2283 1.7098 1.6820 1.8721 1.7827
13 1.5284 2.0288 1.8403 1.5621 1.1250 1.6043 1.61 97 1.6756 1.6594 1.251 2 1.6298 1.8007
14 1.4101 1.9261 1.7223 1.2942 1.5504 1.6303 1.3194 1.6792 1.6817 1.2167 1.5791 1.8597
15 1.6485 1.8394 1.6792 1.15, ,-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~5 1.61 67 1.5378 1.2517 1.6964 1.3458 1.5991 1.5541 1.4086
16 1.7658 1.9567 1.7227 1.5664 1.6041 1.2329 1.6385 1.6956 1.2712 1.6556 1.5863 1.3022
17 1.7695 1.6078 1.41 49 1.5563 1.6064 1.2972 1.6471 1.6428 1.6077 1.6,537 1.2740 1.8366
18 1.6995 1.5897 1.3768 1.6607 1.5930 1.5482 1.5538 1.3512 1.6629 1.6273 1.1486 1.7604
19 1.7301 2.0672 1.8061 1.6089 1.3381 1.6368 1.6982 1.2918 1.7611 1.6009 1.5724 1.71 74
2o 1.3635 2.2963 1.8070 1.8121 1.2025 1.6604 1.6467 1.6694 1.7242 1.2316 1.6403 1.9009
21 1.3176 2.0880 1.8489 1.3486 1.5929 1.6522 1.3253 1.6491 1.6300 1.1787 1.5833 1.8049
22 1.7376 2.0813 1.7946 1.1764 1.6571 1.6061 1.2664 1.6913 1.2864 1.6161 1.1447 1.5364
23 1.8388 2.1414 1.7741 1.5809 1.6059 1.3812 1.5890 1.691 2 1.2287 1.5511 1.1997 1.3844
24 1.8712 1.9188 1.4016 1.6528 1.5885 1.2972 1.65,.,'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'30 1.6240 1.6431 1.6114 2.6493 1.3697
25 2.01 08 1.81 55 1.3095 1.6286 1.5834 1.7279 1.6512 1.2678 1.6842 1.6265 1.2263 1.0934
26 1.9783 2.0854 1.7211 ' 1.6502 1.3507 1.6826 1.5904 1.2231 1.7223 1.6392 1.61 32 1.4347
27 1.5084 1.9966 1.7076 1.7215 1.2292 1.6942 1.5682 1.6124 1.6561 1.2869 1.5945 1.6027
28 1.3764 1.9921 1.675 1.1461 1.1903 1.6713 1.2473 1.6734 1.6332 1.216 1.7145 1.9895
29 1.7962 1.7143 1.1590 1.5202 1.5629 1.1928 1.6111 1.3864 1.6513 1.8770 1.9595
3o 1.7999 1.5942 1.5880 1.5377 1.2636 1.6464 1.6224 1.3367 1.8124 1.7647 1.8607
31 1.7466 1.3142 1.5640 1.6808 1.6843 1.6045 1.6984
TOTAL 51.65 52.00 53.17 45.02 46.43 44.85 46.75 48.41 45.66 47.03 46.48 52.80
AVG 1.6661 1.8572 1.7152 1.5006 1.4979 1.4949 !.5081 1.5617 1.5218 1.5171 1.5492 1.7031
WQCP FLOW Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01 May-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01
MONTHLY
TOTAL Year to date (mg) 51.65 103.65 156.82 201.84 248.27 293.12 339.87 388.29 433.94 480.97 527.45 580.24
TOTAL Month (mg) 51.65 52.00 53.17 45.02 46.43 44.85 46.75 48.41 45.66 47.03 46.48 52.80
MONTHLY AVG DALLY (mgd} 1.67 1.86 1.72 1.50 1.50 1.49 1.51 1.56 1.52 1.52 1.55 1.70
MAXIMUM DALLY (mild' 2.26 2.30 2.30 1.81 1.70 1.73 1.70 1.71 1.75 1.81 2.55 2.36
MINIMUM DAILY (mg(f 1.18 1.26 1.31 1.10 1.13 1.13 1.18 1.22 1.10 1.18 1.14 1.09
1996-1998 Historical Flows at San Francisco San Bruno Sewage Treatment Plant
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
pS No. 5 &9~4 pS No.5
Mo~th/ $.n Mdeo Airpod
Year & Airport
(mud) (mgd)
Jan-06 4.1 0.20
Feb-96 4.5 0.20
Mar-96 3.9 0.20
Apr-96 3.5 0.20
May-96 3.6 0.20
Jun-96 3.5 0.20
Jul-96 3.5 0.20
Aug-96 3.4 0.20
Sep-96 3.4 0.20
Oct-96 3.5 0.20
Nov-96 3.8 0.20
Dec-g6 4.7 0.20
Jan-97 5.1 0.20
Feb-97 3.7 0.2O
Mar-97 3.4 0.20
Apr-97 4.3 0.20
May-97 3.5 0.20
Jun-97 3.6 0.20
JuF97 3.5 0.20
Aug-97 3.5 0.20
Sep-97 3.5 0.20
Oct-97 3.5 0.20
Nov-97 4.2 0.20
Dec-97 4.2 0.20
Jan-98 5.7 0.20
Feb-98 7.1 0.2O
Mar-98 4.1 0.20
Apr-98 4.3 0.20
May-98 4.0 0.20
Jun-98 3.8 0.20
Jul-96 3.6 0.20
Aug-98 3.7 0.20
Sap-98 3.8 0.20
Oct-98 3.7 0.20
Nov-98 4.2 0.20
Dec-98 3.8 0.20
1
Average Day Flows I Peak Hour Flows ~
PSNo. 9s PSNo. 116 PSNo. 4/77 T~aI' Mmb,.dPeak PeakHou~ PSNo. 5~'4
San Marco Shaw Road Induslrlal Flow-, at WQCP Flow to Airpofl
Area Avg. Day
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mod) (mud) (gpm) Rdlo (%)
3.9 5 .5 1.3 10.9 30,0 20,833 2.8 2%
4.3 6.3 1.4 12.2 30.0 20,833 2.5 2%
3.7 5.4 1.3 10.6 27.0 18,750 2.5 2%
3.3 4.8 1.3 9.6 31.5 21,875 3.3 2%
3.4 4.6 1.3 9.5 21.1 14,653 2.2 2%
3.3 4,0 1.2 8.7 18.0 12,500 2.1 2%
3.3 3.7 1.2 8.4 16.0 11,111 1.9 2%
3.2 3.7 1,3 8.4 15.0 10,417 1.8 2%
3.2 3.7 1,4 8.5 17.0 11,8o6 2.0 2%
3.3 3.8 1.5 8.8 21.5 14,931 2.4 2%
3.6 4.1 1.4 9.3 26.0 18,o56 2.8 2%
4.5 5.4 1.6 11.7 38.5 26,736 3.3 2%
4.9 6.0 1.7 12.8 35.0 24,306 2.7 2%
3.5 4.2 1.5 9.4 17.5 12,153 1.9 2%
3.2 4.1 1.7 9.2 16.5 11,458 1.8 2%
4.1 3.1 1.5 8.9 18.0 12,500 2.0 2%
3.3 3.8 1.6 8.9 15.5 10,764 1.7 2%
3.4 3.8 1.6 9.0 15.5 10,764 1.7 2%
3.3 3.8 1.7 9.0 14.0 9,722 1.6 2%
3.3 3.8 1.6 8.9 14.7 10,208 1.7 2%
3.3 3.8 1.6 8.9 15.3 10,625 1.7 2%
3.3 3.9 1.6 9.0 20.7 14,375 2.3 2%
4.0 4.7 1.7 10.6 28.8 20,0OO 2.7 2%
4.0 4.8 1.7 10.7 32.0 22,222 3.0 2%
5.5 6.3 1.9 13.9 35.0 24,306 2.5 1%
6.9 7.7 2.2 17.0 34.5 23,958 2.0 1%
3.9 4.3 1.8 10.2 25.8 17,917 2.6 2%
4.1 4.6 1.8 10.7 21.6 15,0OO 2.0 2%
3.8 4.4 1.7 10.1 23.4 16,2~0 2.3 2%
3.6 4.1 1.8 9.7 16.2 11,2~0 1.7 2%
3.4 4.0 1.8 9.4 15.6 10,833 1.7 2%
3.5 4.1 1.8 9.6 18.3 12,708 1.9 2%
3.6 3.8 1.8 9.4 16.8 11,667 1.8 2%
3.5 3.9 1.8 9.4 21.3 14,792 2.3 2%
4.0 4.2 1.6 10.0 25.5 17,708 2.6 2%
3.6 4.2 1.6 9.6 22.8 15,833 2.4 2%
Average Daily Row Percentagee
Data Source: South San Francisce-San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant. Report generated on January 12, 1999, lists daily flows for Shaw Road, San Mateo, and Industrtai Area
Average Day Flows w~re extracted from the WQCP report, and they repersent the monthly sum of the measured dally flows, dlvEled by the number of days In that month.
Peak Hour FIo~s were abo extracted form the WQCP Report, and they represent the highest hourly flow measured during the month.
Measured Flows at the San Matan Flume from Pump Stati~ No. 9 (San Mateo) includes flows from Pu~ Station No. 6.
The Force Main from Pump Station No. 5 (Akport) is manifolded to the 24-inch force main from PS No. 9 and to the 33-Inch force main from PS No. 11.
For the past 3-4 years, this force main has been connected to the 24-Inch force main from PS No. 9 (Sen Mateo)
City staff estimate Pump Station No. 5 contC, butas flows of appr~lmately 0.2 mgd.
Calculated flows for PS No. 9 are based on the Measured flows, as extracted from the 1009 WQCP Rrepod, lass Ihe estimated 0.2 mgd from PS No. 5.
Measured Flows at the Shaw Reed Flume
Mea-ured Flows at the Indudtrlal Area Flume, east of US Highway 101. The measurements inctude flows from Pump Slatl~n~ Nee. 4, 7, and their tdbutarleL
T~al Measured flows at the WCQP.
AdAoted from the 1999 Infiltration end Inflow Sludy perto~med by Carollo Engineers
PSNo. 9s PSNo. 11" PSNo. 4//7
San Mdeo Shaw Road Industrial
Ama
(%) (%) (%)
36% 50% 12%
35% 52% 11%
35% 51% 12%
34% 50 % 14 %
36% 48% 14%
38% 46% 14%
39% 44% 14%
38% 44 % 15 %
38% 44 % 16 %
38% 43 % 17 %
39% 44 % 15 %
38% 46% 14%
38% 47% 13%
37% 45 % 16 %
3~% 45% 18%
~ 35% 17%
37% 43% 18%
33% 42 % 16 %
37% 42% 19%
37% 43% 16%
37% 43 % 18 %
37% 43 % 18 %
38% 44% 16%
37% 45 % 16 %
40% 45% 14%
41% 45 % 13 %
38% 42 % 18 %
38% 43% 17%
38% 44% 17%
37% 42% 19%
36% 43% 19%
36% 43% 19%
38% 40 % 19 %
37% 41% 19 %
~ 42% 16%
38% 44% 17%
Histor'cal Flows at WQCP (1996-1998)
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Month
Figure Data
PS Nos. 4 and 7 Flows and Peaking Factors
Month/ Average Maximum Max-Day Peak Hour
Year Day Flow Day Flow to Avg-Day to Avg-Day
(mild) (mgcl) Factor Factor
Jar,-,-96 1.3 2.3 1.7 2.8
Feb-96 1.4 1.8 1.3 2.5
Mar-96 1.3 1.8 1.3 2.5
Apr-96 1.3 1.6 1.2 3.3
May-96 1.3 1.5 1.1 2.2
Jun-96 1.2 1.7 1.3 2.1
Jul-96 1.2 1.5 1.1 1.9
Aug-96 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.8
Sep-96 1.4 1.6 1.2 2.0
Oct-96 1.5 1.7 1.3 2.4
Nov-96 1,4 1.7 1.3 2.8
Dec-96 1.6 2.4 1.8 3.3
Jan-97 1.7 2.6 t .6 2.7
Feb-97 1.5 1.9 1.2 1.9
Mar-97 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.8
Apr-97 1.5 1.8 1,1 2.0
May-97 1.6 1.8 1,1 1.7
Jun-97 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.7
Jul-97 1.7 2.0 1.2 1.6
Aug-97 1.6 1.9 1.2 1.7
Sep-97 1.6 1.8 1,1 1.7
Oct-97 1.6 1.9 1.1 2.3
Nov-97 1.7 2.6 1.6 2.7
Dec-97 1,7 22. 1.4 3.0
Jan-98 1.9 2.7 1.5 2.5
Feb.98 2.2 3.0 1.7 2.0
Mar-98 1.8 2.0 1.1 2.5
Apr-98 1.8 2.1 1.2 2.0
May-98 1.7 2.1 1.2 2.3
Jun-98 1.8 2.0 1.1 1.7
Jul-98 1.8 2.0 1.1 1.7
Aug..98 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.9
Sep-98 1.8 2.0 1.1 1.8
0ct-98 1.8 22 12 2.3
Nov-98 1.6 2,0 1.1 2.6
Dec-98 1.6 1.9 1.1 2.4
1996 1.4 2.4 1.8 3.3
1997 1.6 2.6 1.6 3.0
1998 1.8 3.0 1.7 2.6
1
2
3
Data Source: South San Francisco-San Bruno Water Quality ~ Plant. Rep<xt generated on Januap/12, 1909
For planning puqx~e~ Peak Hours were e~timated based on the tolal measured peek hour Itows ~ ~ W~,
Study Period D~ Se~so~s: 1996 (June to Septlmbe0, 1997 0day to Sep~mbe0, and lg98 (June to August).
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX C - SEWER FLOW BALANCE
September 2002
H :\Final~SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~ P P.doc
Sewer Flow Balance
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
(ACRES)
(OPO)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER
WATER WASTEWATE R WAS'I~WATER
USE
(t00CF) ( 100 CF) (GPO)
B-3 11 21.61 VAC
B-2 12 11.70 OS/1~
B-S 18 7.64 If'4)
B-4 14 7.10
B-2 1SA 1402
B,-5 15B 6.01
75
87-10-2~6 9717 8745 17922
FLOW
COEFF
((~P~/AC)
875
875
375
(GP~)
2641
0
2~62
5257
1878
3837
967
2241
0
0
1457
2~01
62O2
10268
0
2229
2606
3006
7336
1732
2O63
8788
8423
2564
3308
0
10257
19048
TOTAL
54922
OFF
OFF
OFF
DEVELOPER
FLOW
(GPO)
FUTURE CONDITIONS
2o02
FLOW
WASTEWATER
COEFFICIENT
(,eF'O~t(XX)SF)/(
400
CALCULATED
R.OW
(,~0)
2841 OF~) 4O0
1106 ORD 400
11488 ORe) 400
2~00 Of~) F~(X]0 400
~ (:X~D 400
86~4 O~O 400
7336 O~D 400
3796 C)RD 400
5788 ORD 400
S6448 O~D 8GOOS 400
17001 C)~D 400
ORD 4OO
25~4 ORD 40O
3368 ORD 231100 400
eoooo
45128 46128
221110 221110
177445
431M 481M
42000 42000
820OO 62OO0
16200 16200
72344 72344
100270 1~0270
211318 211818
Sewer Flow Balance
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER
WATER
GROSS DEVELOPER
BASINAREA ID LAND USE USE
AREA FLOW CONSUMPTION GENERATED FLOW
METER
(ACRFS) (GPD) (10OCF) (100 CF) (GPD)
B-6 I 12.93 ORD
B-6 I 67-20~435 83670 75303 154320
B-6 2 20.15 ORD
B-6 2 67-20-1450 24849 22364 45831
B-6 2 67-20-1445 3236 2914 5972
B-6 2 67-20-1430 1426 1283 2630
B-6 2 67-20-1420 197 177 363
B-6 2 68-35-2020 68 61 125
B-6 3 7.53 ORD
B-6 3 67-20-0601 106705 96035 196805
B~ 3 67-20-1465 25772 23195 47533
B~ 3 67-20-0560 5837 5253 10766
B-6 3 67-20-1480 2651 2386 4889
B-6 3 67-20-0530 2258 2032 4165
B-6 3 67-20-0755 1038 934 1914
B-6 3 67-20-1505 478 430 882
B-6 4 2.42 IND
B-6 5 4.70 ORD
B-6 5 57-20-0495 4364 3928 8049
B-6 5 67-20-0500 3354 3019 6186
B-4 6 7.04 IND
B-4 7 2.95 IND
B~I 8 13.34 IND 67-10-2980 6229 5606 11489
B-4 9 4.05 ORD 20500 67-10-1083 6968 6271 12852
B-4 9 67-10-10O5 2102 1892 3877
B-4 9 67-10-0998 3283 2955 6055
B-4 9 67-10-10O0 1424 1282 2626
B-3 10 27.19 VAC
B-3 11 2161 VAC
B-2 12 11.70 OS/PUB
B-5 13 7.64 IND 66000
B-4 14 7.10 IND
B-2 15A 14.02 IND
B-5 158 5.01 IND
B-4 16 12.79 COM
B-4 16 10.08 75
B-4 16 2.58 IND
B-4 16 7.47 OFF
B-4 16 3.21 OS/PUB
B-4 16 2.24 VAC
B-2 17 3.88 IND
B-2 18 6.94 IND
B-2 lg 20.67 MAR COM
B-4 20 27.38 IND
B.4 20 1.69
B-9 21 7.64 VAC
B-5 22 5.94 IND
B-4 23A 6.93 IND
B-2 238 10.~3
B-4 24 19.56 IND
B-4 25A 4.62 INO
B-5 258 5.50
B-4 26 15.44
B-9 27 1.81 IND 56446
B-8 28 22.46 IND
B-~ 26 9.07 ORD 8578
B-6 29 6.81 INO
B-2 30 9.06 IND
B-5 31 8.13 VAC
B-9 32 27.35 IND
67-10-2905 5717 8745 17922
FLOW
COEFF
~GPD/AC)
375
375
375
0
375
375
375
3O0
375
30O
0
0
375
375
30O
375
0
375
375
375
375
375
375
375
375
375
375
0
375
CALCULATED
FLOW
(GPD)
2~41
1196
0
2662
5"/~7
1678
3837
967
2241
0
0
1467
2601
6202
10298
0
2598
3985
7336
1732
2O63
57~8
8423
2654
33,98
0
10257
TOTAL
FLOW2
fGPD)
154320
54922
14235
2041
1196
11489
2O50O
0
66O0O
2062
7135
7120
1457
2601
62O2
20169
0
2229
6,664
7336
3796
5708
56448
17981
2654
3398
0
10257
LAND USE
OFF
ORD
ORD
OFF
OFF
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
COM
HCOM
ORD
COM
OFF
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
OFF
ORD
ORD
COM
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
ORD
HCOM
INO
DEVELOPER
FLOW
(GPD)
177445
2327OO
100
231100
50375
320315
FUTURE CONDITIONS
2o02
FLow
WASTEWATER
COEFFICIENT
FLOW
(GPD) (GPD/1000SF)/(
GPD/AGt
5O
4OO
CALCULATED TOTAL FLOW~
FLOW
(GPD) (GPD)
114976 169900
400 10005O 366954
50 1100 1100
50 45O0 18735
4OO 6005O 5O0O0
4O0 45128 45126
400 221110 221110
400 19356 50000
400
90
155 GPD/ROOM
400
5O
50
400
400
4O0
400
5O
177445
43184 43184
61600 127000
90326 90326
277669 277669
11815 11615
400 42000 42000
400 62000 62000
90 16200 16'200
400 335377 335377
400 106590 105590
400 72344 72344
400 223864 223664
400 190270 190270
400 1129O8 112~0~
400 211316 211316
400 395176 395176
40O
400 60357 60357
40O 121550 231100
155 GPD/ROOIV 50375 50375
250 195883 320315
Sewer Flow Balance
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
GROSS
BASINAREA ID LAND USE
AREA
(ACRES)
B-3 33 28.49 ORD
B-3 33
B-3 34 1208 HCOM
B-1 35 25.98 OFF
8-1 35 9.86
8-1 35
R-1 35 22.49
B-1 35
B-2 36 506 IND
8-2 36 5.48 OFF
B-2 36
B-2 37 8.10 OFF
B-2 37 3659 OFF
B-2 37
B-2 37
B-2 37
B-2 37
B-2 37
B-2 37
8-2 37
8-2 37
B-2 38 3.72 OFF
B-2 39 4.79 HCOM
8-2 40 21.58 MAR COM
8-2 41 10.15 IND
8-2 41 2.74 ORD
8-2 42 8.04 IND
B.5 43 13.57 IND
B-5 44 24.97 IND
8-5 44 2.58
B.5 45 8.17 IND
B-5 46 14.67 ORD
B.5 46
8-5 46
B-5 46
8-5 46
B-5 46
B.5 47 1798 IND
B.5 47
B.5 47
B-6 47
B-5 47 6.98 ORD
B-6 47
B.5 47
B.5 47
B-6 47
B-6 48 27.39 ORD
8-6 48
B.5 49 3O3 IND
B-6 49
B.5 49 5.99 ORD
B-6 49
B.5 49
B.5 50 14.87 ORD
B.5 5O
B-6 5O
B-6 5O
B*6 5O
B.6 5O
B.5 5O
8.5 51 1 99 IND
8.5 52 5.36 ORD
B-9 53 22.59 IND
B-9 54 13.77 INO
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER
DEVELOPER WATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER
USE
FLOW CONSUMPTIONGENERATED FLOW
METER
(GPD) (100CF) {15O CF) (GPD)
n/a
67-35.555O 7057 6351 13016
67-35-5570 5813 5232 10721
26744 67-35-5530 13189 11870 24326
20856 67-35-5510 9800 8820 18075
2613
36O
23000 67-25-5008 8944 8050 16496
67-25-5004 680 612 1254
67-25-1700 704 634 1298
67-25-3006 1989 1790 3668
67-25-2005 2121 1909 3912
67-25-2010 898 808 1656
67-25-1990 56 50 103
67-25-2020 9394 8455 17326
67-20-2105 34726 31253 64048
67-20-085O 7620 6858 14054
67-20-05O0 507 456 935
67-20.0905 524 472 966
67-20.0930 342 308 631
67-20.0955 1818 1636 3353
67-20-1695 5234 4711 9654
67-20-1655 1239 1115 2285
67-20-1690 1409 1268 2599
67-20.0405 484 436 893
67-20.0380 338 304 623
67-20-1590 2?4 247 505
67.20-1580 272 245 502
67-20-1530 4522 4070 8340
67-20-0805 7873 7086 14521
67-20-0635 10688 9619 19713
67-20.075O 625 563 1153
67-20-1042 5617 5055 10360
67-20-I055 3684 3316 6795
67-2~-1365 2159 1943 3982
67-20-1075 1384 1246 2553
67-20-1355 700 630 1291
67-20-1050 82 5O 114
3333
FLOW
COEFF
(GPD/AC)
706
300
300
375
3OO
3OO
3OO
3OO
375
375
375
375
375
375
7O0
375
375
CALCULATED
FLOW
(GPD)
19945
3623
7794
1898
2430
1115
1438
6475
3806
3013
5O90
9364
3065
745
3749
O471
5162
TOTAL
FLOW2
(GPD)
19945
3623
79131
4871
48145
1115
1438
6475
7139
3013
5O9O
73412
3065
19940
17O61
8340
35386
745
3749
~471
5162
LAND USE
ORD
HCOM
OFF
IND
OFF
OFF
OFF
HCOM
MAR COM
IND
ORD
IND
IND
IND
IND
ORD
IND
ORD
ORD
INO
ORD
ORD
IND
ORD
IND
IND
DEVELOPER
FLOW
(GPD)
25430
2O456
4020
36O
282O0
165OO
4O00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
2002
R.OW
WASTEWATER
COEFFICIENT
R. OW
(GPO) (GPD/15O0SF)/(
GPD/AC~
7O0
300
3O0
13016
10721
CALCULATED TOTAL FLOW3'
FLOW
(GPD) (GPD)
19945 19945
3623 3623
7794 77417
1298
3668
3912
1656
103
17326
3OO
300
3OO
375
375
375
375
64O48
375
14O54
935
966
631
3353
9654
2285
2599
893
623
5O5
5O2
8340
14521
19713
1153
10360
6795
39~2
2553
129t
114
375
700
375
375
375 1898 8276
300 2430 75095
1115 1115
143~ 1438
6475 6475
3806 7806
3013 3013
5090 5090
93O4 73412
3O65 30~5
19940
17061
8340
35386
25O95
745 745
3749 3749
8471 8471
5162 5162
Sewer Flow Balance
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
BASIN AREA
B-9 55
B-9 56
B -9 56
B-9 56
B-9 56
B-9 56
B-9 57 11.82 IND
B-9 58 12.59 IND
B-9 59 625 IND
B-9 59 294 ORD
B-4 59 67-10-1243
B-4 60 2.10 IND
B-4 60 42~ 67-10-2270
B-4 61 3.46 IND
B-4 62 20.35 IND
B-4 63 27.95 IND
B-4 63 12.82 ORD
B-4 64 4.43 HCOM
B-4 64 67~5~5205
54 64 18.60 IND
B-4 64 1.25 OFF
B-4 64 125 VAC
B-4 65 7.16 COM
B-4 66 6.01 HCOM
B-4 66 10.18 IND
B-4 67 3.29 IND
B-4 67 18.62 ORD
B-4 67 67-10-1094
B-4 67 67-10-1090
B-4 67 2.59 3300
B-4 65 12.51 IND
B-4 68 1.74 ORD
B-4 69 13 21 IND
B-4 69 1.41 2025
B-4 69 1.16 OFF
B-4 70 10.0a HCOM
B-4 70 67-25~173O
B-4 70 67-254)710
B-4 70 67-204205
B~ 70 67-20-3280
B-4 70 6.95 ORD
B-4 70 n/a
B-4 70 10.88 67-25-4260
B-4 70 67-25-4270
B-4 70 67-25-5009
B-4 70 67-25-4263
B-4 70 67-25-4280
B-4 70 67-10-3460
B-4 7O 67-10-3405
B-4 71 4 98 HCOM
B-4 71 27.31 OFF
B-4 71 67-25-4000
B-4 71 67-25-4025
B-4 71 67-25-1500
B-4 71 67-25-1475
B-4 71 67-25-4100
B-4 71 67-25-4125
B-4 71 ORD
B-4 71 5.47 67-20-3140
B-4 71 67-25-1435
B-4 71 5.47 10123
B-4 71 1 96 VAC
B-4 72 4.46 IND
B-4 72 211 OS/PUB
EXISTING CONDITIONS
GROSS DEVELOPER WATER WATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER
ID AREA LAND USE FLOW USE CONSUMPTION GENERATED FLOW
METER
(ACRFS) (GPD) {100C1~ {100 CF) (GPD)
7.12 IND
1480 IND
15.80 67-10-1430 5006 4505 9233
67-10-1460 2550 2295 4703
67-10-1530 3279 2951 6048
67-10~470 6301 5671 11621
18759 16~83 34599
5165.0 4649 9526
8915 ~024 16443
7916 7124 14600
3167 2850 5841
6944 8050 16496
958 862 1767
21525 19373 39700
2235 2012 4t22
12936 11644 23863
1714 1543 3161
984 886 1815
5326 4793 9823
5484 4936 10115
1029 926 1598
891 802 1643
2~74 2587 5301
2740 2466 5054
9110 8199 16802
7254 6529 13379
6323 5691 11662
173 156 319
5976 5378 11022
1755 1580 3237
FLOW
COEFF
{GPD/AC)
375
375
CALCULATED
FLOW
(GPD)
TOTAL
FLOW2
LAND USE
(GPD)
2668 2668 IND
5550 37155 IND
375 4434 4434
375 4721 4721
375 2343 36941
375 788 10314
375 1297 1297
375 7631 7631
375 403 9237
700 8834
23569
375 7050
300 376
0 0
300 2147 2147
300 2402 6219
375 3818
375 1234 24975
375
700
375
3O0
IND
IND
IND
ORD
IND
IND
IND
INO
ORD
HCOM
IND
OFF
HCOM
COM
HCOM
IND
IND
ORD
4690 5910 IND
1220 ORD
4954 7327 IND
346 OFF
119268 HCOM
700
4865
3OO 1493 96585
300 8193
0 0
375 1679 5891
0 0
ORD
HCOM
OFF
ORD
HCOM
IND
OS/PUB
DEVELOPER
FLOW
(GPD)
16443
1299~
22475
FUTURE CONDmONS
20o2
FLow
WASTEWATER
COEFFICIENT
FLOW
(GPD) (GPDI1000SF)/(
GPD/ACI
375
375
9233
4703
6O48
11621
375
375
375
34599
16443
146OO
5841
16496
1767
39700
4122
23863
3161
1815
9623
10115
1596
1643
5301
5O54
16802
13379
11662
319
11022
3237
CALCULATED TOTAL FLOW:~
FLOW
(GPD) (GPD)
2668 2668
5550 37155
4434 4434
4721 4721
2343 36941
375 799 10314
375 1297 1297
375 7631 7031
375 403 9237
700 8834
23869
375 7050
300 376
0 0
300 2147 2147
300 2402 6219
375 3818
375 1234 26675
375 4690 5910
700 1220
375 4954 8002
3O0 346
1192~8
700 4665
300 1493 109218
300 5478
375 1679 5891
0 0
Sewer Flow Balance
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
IBASIN AREA ID
8..4 72
B-4 72
8-4 72
B-4 72
B4 73 2267 IND
B-4 74 5.02 {ND
B-~ 75 1287 IND
B-8 78 11.87 IND
B-7 77 3.17 COM
B-7 77 9.49 HCOM
B-Z 77
B-7 77
B-7 77 29.39 ~ND
B-7 77 1.41 OFF
TOTAL 1257
EXISTING CONDmON$
WATER
GROSS DEVELOPER WATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER
LAND USE USE
AREA FLOW CONSUMPTIONGENERATED R.ON
METER
(ACRES) (GPO) (100CF) (100 CF) (GPD)
0.58 PARK
14.50 ORD
67-2~1035 22~1 2053 4207
67-20-1040 3 3 6
67-05-4555 22840 20556 42126
67-05-4550 2119 1907 3908
1. Average flow of 1.59 MGD dsbrmined from 2001 WC~CP records movided by City.
2 TOfai Flow is selecled from best av;~lai~e and rdiebte source
a. Derek=er F~4v: base~ on written res~ses from IndusllJ~ (Fdo 2002)
b. Washw/ab~' Row: based on 2001 Water Use Records; was~#ater flow rate es§ma~d at 90.4, of wa~' metered d~l~,
c. Calculated Flow: based ~ an appropriate coefficient al~ed lo ~e gross ac~'eege, in ~e absence of flow records
3. Tokai Flow is sel~ from be~t aveil~ e~d r~ialfle source
a. Developer Flow: based o~ w~lte~ responses from hx]us~ie~ (Fe~ 2002)
b. 2002 Wastew~w Flow: E)~sl~ng Cor, dili~s To~l Flow fm ar~s nol ~ te cha~ge ~ u~e ~g~alf~
c. C~ulated Row: based o~ an al~)i'~l~rlate coefficient ap~/Jed Io ~e g~ols ecfeege, in Ihe absance of flow records
FLOW
COEFF
(GPD/AC)
0
375
~75
375
375
300
375
300
CALCULATED
FLOW
(GPD)
0
8502
1683
4826
4451
951
11021
423
TOTAL
FLOWs
8502
1683
4026
4451
5842~
1.618,916
LAND USE
PARK
ORD
IND
;NO
IND
IND
COM
HCOM
IND
OFF
DEVELOPER
FLOW
(GPO)
FUTURE CONDITIONS
2002
FLOW CALCULATED
WASTEWATER COEFFICIENT FLOW TOTAL FLOW3
FLOW
(GPO) (GPD/1000~F)/(
C, PDiAC~' (GPD) (GPD)
0 0
4207
6
375 8502 8502
375 1883 1883
375 4826 4826
375 4451 4451
300 951 58429
42126
3906
375 11021
3OO 423
8,496,583
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX D - INDUSTRY FLOW PROJECTIONS SURVEY
September 2002
H:\Final~S 3S FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~APP.doc
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX E - 2001 WATER USE METERED DATA
September 2002
H:\FinaI~SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~PP.doc
2001 Water Use Metered Data
East of Highway 101 Sewer System Master Plan
City of South San Francisco
Meter Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
67-05-0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6~05 0025 212 209 222 186 198 235 210 166 187 141 161 122 2249
67-05-0075 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-05-0080 305 288 309 312 356 368 316 292 341 303 373 271 3834
6~05.0105 244 202 246 221 280 294 252 225 281 258 234 142 2879
67-05.0110 0 0 0 0 0 35 211 250 241 361 210 196 1504
67-05.0120 0 0 0 0 1 13 74 102 89 45 5 1 330
67-05-0155 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 10 8 4 0 0 33
67-05-0180 71 61 69 46 66 64 64 57 63 44 49 40 694
67-05-0205 228 166 144 180 139 163 152 158 194 122 164 20 1830
6~05.0230 1035 725 765 997 975 1209 1287 1261 1243 814 1043 802 12156
67-05-0240 0 0 0 0 0 46 4 60 69 61 69 44 353
67-05-0255 1154 1012 1152 1295 1316 1577 1458 1459 1386 889 933 691 14322
67-05-0280 12 10 14 18 19 29 39 36 35 25 19 10 266
67-05-0305 I I 0 1 I 1 I I I 0 1 I 10
67-05-0330 33 30 47 39 30 39 36 41 31 25 28 30 409
67-05-0355 19 16 18 18 22 40 53 48 58 48 40 29 409
67-05-0370 209 184 113 129 161 241 257 246 237 190 194 163 2324
67-05-0380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-05-0405 469 405 307 395 529 632 509 358 401 322 348 305 4980
67-05-0430 0 0 11 0 0 10 7 12 25 23 27 I 116
67-05-0455 19 16 15 11 14 13 8 7 6 7 6 7 129
67-05-0480 14 13 12 9 10 10 9 7 8 8 8 6 114
67-05-0505 5 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 51
67-05-0520 20 18 18 31 28 30 28 25 30 27 24 16 295
67-05-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-05-0555 18 52 17 12 10 12 9 8 7 8 8 7 168
67-05.0580 35 32 33 32 26 35 48 50 58 57 56 6 468
67-05-0605 23 22 19 14 8 20 24 22 26 24 27 21 250
67-05-0630 11 7 12 21 20 16 3 2 7 2 4 0 105
67-05-0655 8 9 79 87 77 34 11 7 10 9 8 6 345
67-05-0705 40 35 39 36 24 29 29 19 27 29 20 33 360
67-05.0730 32 28 28 24 25 28 20 20 23 21 22 19 290
67-05.0755 66 54 115 105 88 48 48 46 61 61 50 21 763
67-05-0780 17 18 16 17 20 34 20 19 23 19 17 12 232
67-05-0805 8 6 9 9 14 15 14 12 14 10 8 5 124
67-05.0830 19 18 18 13 14 12 12 15 13 15 15 16 180
67-05-0855 6 5 6 7 8 10 9 22 11 9 8 5 106
67-05-0880 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 8 2 2 3 42
67-05-0905 1352 1331 1394 1088 1257 1496 1438 1219 1429 1266 1526 1151 15947
Meter
67-05-0930
67-05.0955
67-O5-O98O
67-05-1005
67-05-1018
67-05-1030
67-05-1055
67-05-1080
67-05-1082
67-05-1084
67-05-1086
67-05-1088
67-05-1105
67-05-1120
67-05-1121
67-05-1125
67-05-1130
67-05-1155
67-05-1230
67-05-1255
67-05-1280
67-05-1290
67-05-1295
67-05-1330
67-05-1355
67-05-1365
67-05-1380
67-05-1400
67-05.1405
67-05.1415
67-05-1425
67-05-1430
67-05-1455
67-05-1480
67-05-15O5
67-05-1530
67-05-1555
67-05-158O
67-05-1605
67-05-1655
67-05-1680
67-05-1705
67-05-1755
67-05-1780
Jan
3
237
0
8
15
4
2
0
350
92
212
93
0
12
0
56
34
61
0
18
1528
116
262
23
0
4
7
57
54
0
0
0
0
0
45
15
1
41
6
10
1
2
3
178
Feb
6
234
0
8
10
3
2
1
525
88
288
97
0
17
0
19
32
62
0
11
1054
114
192
10
0
5
12
48
49
2
0
0
0
0
56
14
23
4
0
9
1
1
3
134
Mar
7
231
o
9
lO
4
2
o
176
83
235
94
o
40
o
o
27
92
o
9
lO24
269
185
12
o
3
7o
46
50
2
4
o
o
7
22
15
14
2
o
14
o
1
3
118
Apr
7
224
o
8
9
3
2
o
388
84
38o
1
o
6
205
o
27
2Ol
o
11
12o9
347
183
8
o
3
96
48
49
o
3
o
o
27
24
18
12
2
o
8
1
1
7
119
May
10
207
0
5
7
2
2
0
558
88
1019
17
0
144
301
0
33
206
0
2O
1025
423
201
22
0
3
98
54
51
0
5
0
0
26
26
37
15
2
0
9
1
2
4
143
Jun
13
233
o
o
9
2
1
o
614
lOl
730
35
o
lO
357
o
31
244
o
20
1355
45o
263
37
o
4
lO6
83
61
o
8
o
o
28
3o
32
7
1
23
11
o
1
4
126
Jul
13
187
0
0
8
4
2
0
754
108
21
0
14
406
0
30
222
0
27
1241
433
223
31
0
5
86
80
57
0
3O
0
0
26
32
6
1
35
11
1
2
3
'118
Aug
9
189
0
1
8
3
3
0
595
97
385
15
0
18
205
0
29
2O7
0
17
881
395
210
0
4
6O
54
0
16
0
0
24
42
31
3
1
23
10
1
1
3
176
Sep
9
124
0
0
8
3
2
0
652
135
629
26
0
19
0
256
0
29
1181
461
213
56
0
4
110
88
57
0
3O
0
0
28
33
4
1
27
10
0
1
3
180
Oct
8
139
0
0
7
4
2
0
740
111
674
6
0
15
81
0
29
211
0
2O
953
389
267
66
0
1
73
78
5O
0
18
0
0
26
67
14
3
1
29
9
0
2
3
124
Nov
9
151
o
o
9
4
2
1
465
lO8
688
23
o
18
lOl
1
32
175
o
22
746
435
225
14
o
4
17
9
53
25
63
o
o
16
147
15
o
1
22
12
o
2
2
lO8
Dec
7
96
o
o
6
3
2
o
948
98
559
95
o
16
7
o
34
76
o
28
85o
271
198
35
o
4
7
o
o
35
o
o
o
119
lO
9
1
22
12
o
1
2
114
Total
101
2252
0
39
106
39
24
2
6765
1193
6247
523
0
329
1747
76
372
2013
0
232
13047
4103
2622
358
0
746
651
629
29
212
0
0
2O8
686
266
97
58
187
125
6
17
40
1638
Meter
67-05-1805
67-05-1830
67-05-1855
67-05-1880
67-05-1905
67-05-1930
67-05-1955
67-05-1980
67-05-2005
67-05-2030
67-05-2055
67-05-2080
67-05-2105
67-05-2130
67-05-2155
67-05-2182
67-05-2184
67-05-2186
67-05-2188
67-05-2190
67-05-2192
67-05-2194
67-05-2205
67-05-2235
67-05-2255
67-05-2280
67-05-2305
67-05-2315
67-05-2330
67-05-2355
67-05-2405
67-05-2415
67-05-2430
67-05-2455
67-05-2480
67-05-2505
67-05-2530
67-05-2540
67-05-2555
67-05-2580
67-05-2605
67-05-2655
67-05-2680
67-05-2705
Jan
31
140
17
0
21
18
25
6
9
41
12
4
62
30
20
2
86
21
16
91
29
52
81
0
39
55
13
14
16
49
35
268
105
38
18
4
16
21
16
109
23
18
79
11
Feb
32
129
16
0
16
16
15
5
11
38
12
10
26
26
17
1
132
15
15
71
33
94
144
0
33
55
5
12
13
73
32
241
115
32
16
2
2O
11
23
101
15
21
76
8
Mar
29
137
13
o
14
19
13
6
11
54
7
8
19
23
16
3
lO3
17
16
68
35
111
161
o
31
62
4
lO
26
58
35
135
173
29
16
o
65
o
15
95
27
12
72
14
Apr
lO5
136
22
o
14
25
16
6
11
72
7
8
24
40
25
4
155
14
16
32
33
303
307
o
32
80
3
34
45
73
66
172
239
29
22
2
4
o
17
95
9
14
lol
27
May
63
138
2O
0
12
27
11
6
10
89
8
11
83
79
59
16
118
21
16
20
37
499
355
0
29
101
9
25
52
85
79
167
229
32
27
1
20
1
24
93
18
17
76
27
Jun
115
147
27
0
19
30
14
6
10
109
8
14
71
105
73
41
357
14
14
29
38
633
508
0
34
81
15
42
60
97
188
194
360
29
24
3
19
0
19
105
25
24
94
28
Jul
151
133
20
0
18
30
25
6
10
136
8
15
53
110
38
33
298
15
17
59
46
710
452
0
31
107
15
35
80
96
198
172
520
29
19
2
22
1
23
106
27
22
115
' 28
Aug
144
161
13
0
14
27
32
6
7
109
7
18
52
122
36
87
279
11
2O
26
33
679
413
0
25
93
13
24
98
96
180
167
341
29
18
2
12
0
17
118
23
22
132
26
Sep
155
208
13
0
16
30
8
6
10
38
6
9
49
104
27
110
25O
15
13
26
27
732
351
0
36
104
12
107
105
186
201
349
33
15
3
46
0
12
169
25
23
125
29
Oct
96
143
19
0
18
10
7
12
36
4
7
35
89
22
130
280
16
14
32
383
191
0
32
67
13
18
102
105
77
188
242
30
14
3
101
0
15
149
24
24
117
8
Nov
43
164
31
0
2O
13
9
8
12
38
6
6
25
73
17
150
341
19
14
50
32
496
261
0
36
73
13
21
85
110
68
307
208
29
14
11
134
0
19
170
2O
14
103
8
Dec
6
131
27
0
8
8
6
10
35
6
7
21
56
26
58
293
24
12
26
32
139
109
0
25
63
14
10
75
77
30
153
162
11
12
5
41
0
17
103
10
13
76
10
Total
970
1767
238
0
190
186
74
123
795
91
117
520
857
376
635
2692
2O2
183
532
4O7
4831
3333
0
383
941
129
289
759
1024
1174
2365
3043
35O
215
38
5OO
217
1413
246
224
1166
224
Meter
67-05-2730
67-05-2755
67-05-2780
67-O5-2805
67-05-2830
67-05-2855
67-05-2880
67-05-2905
67-05-2930
67-05-2955
67-05-2980
67-05-3005
67-05-3030
67-05-3055
67-05-3080
67-05-3105
67-05-3130
67-05-3155
67-05-3180
67-05-3205
67-05-3230
67-05-3255
67-05-3280
67-05-3295
67-05-3298
67-05-3305
67-05-3330
67-05-3355
67-05-3380
67-05-3405
67-05-3430
67-05-3455
67-05-3480
67-05-3505
67-05-3530
67-05-3555
67-05-3580
67-O5-36O5
67-05-3680
67-05-3705
67-05-373O
67-05-3755
67-05-3805
67-05-3830
Jan
10
9
35
2O4
29
0
7
19
10
2
0
5
38
5O
53
167
11
5
6
5
26
8
27
4O
11
116
6
6
10
13
3
6
4
26
4
36
15
86
0
7
23
17
21
5
Feb
13
6
3O
85
22
0
4
4
5
4
0
3
4O
35
55
156
12
6
9
5
23
8
16
3O
10
104
7
5
17
14
2
6
3
4
3
33
32
0
6
19
16
17
6
Mar
12
7
23
27
38
22
2
4
2
1
o
o
36
38
58
181
9
6
14
4
24
8
13
45
25
lOO
7
14
9
12
7
7
19
3
3
25
15
35
o
6
29
13
16
5
Apr
29
5
31
12
61
44
1
7
1
0
0
1
50
38
55
185
12
21
42
3
52
7
21
49
94
188
4
19
8
11
1
6
51
1
4
24
48
37
0
7
25
16
9
5
May
53
7
42
412
72
68
2
6
2
1
0
3
42
54
63
177
12
38
71
5
92
9
69
229
7
21
9
10
3
6
4
1
5
23
56
31
1
6
25
32
5
Jun
88
21
43
121
74
53
2
7
2
1
o
1
4o
42
66
205
17
53
lO9
5
117
lO
34
75
2Ol
267
6
69
8
11
3
5
5
o
4
40
62
33
o
8
17
35
12
5
Jul
49
4
38
89
63
47
2
5
1
0
0
0
3O
58
185
17
60
5
84
9
32
73
177
280
9
88
23
11
3
6
4
1
3
48
59
0
7
19
41
14
6
Aug
59
5
38
352
65
42
1
3
1
1
0
1
4O
39
59
199
13
38
88
3
98
7
31
58
132
210
6
93
7
8
3
4
4
0
4
49
58
0
7
28
29
12
4
Sep
5O
21
41
99
74
54
2
3
1
4
0
1
23
82
65
279
14
3O
57
5
79
8
60
59
153
213
4
93
13
11
4
4
4
0
4
49
67
25
0
7
29
31
16
6
Oct
55
5
42
51
55
46
2
4
2
2
0
0
31
49
62
256
14
37
55
5
64
9
38
61
213
165
4
89
9
11
1
6
3
0
4
45
60
22
0
6
37
3O
16
5
NOV
19
5
54
28
51
12
2
3
8
3
o
1
20
66
61
226
7
3
lO
4
39
8
45
93
96
23o
5
75
6
9
1
5
3
o
4
55
71
25
0
5
3O
41
16
6
Dec
16
6
46
3
51
1
1
2
2
8
o
o
14.
61
48
152
5
3
5
3
48
8
17
79
1
134
3
25
8
6
1
5
4
o
4
86
16
o
5
30
63
16
6
Total
453
101
463
1483
655
38g
28
67
37
27
0
16
418
584
7O3
2368
143
274
526
52
746
99
368
731
1342
2205
68
597
127
127
32
66
108
36
46
461
629
424
1
77
311
364
173
64
Meter
67-05-3855
67-05-3886
67-05-3912
67-05-3936
67-05-3962
67-05-3980
67-05-4005
67-05-4030
67-05-4035
67-05-4055
67-05-4080
67-05-4105
67-05-4130
67-05-4155
67-05-4180
67-05-4205
67-05-4230
67-05-4255
67-05-4280
67-05-4305
67-05-4330
67-05-4355
67-05-4380
67-05-4385
67-05-4390
67-05-4405
67-05-4430
67-05-~,~,~,5
67-05-4455
67-05-4480
67-05-4505
67-05-4530
67-05-4550
67-05-4555
67-O5-4605
67-05-4610
67-05-4630
67-05-4655
67-05-4680
67-05-4705
67-O5-4725
67-05-4730
67-05-4755
67-05-4780
Jan
10
0
0
15
2
9
24
0
46
16
10
24
2
2
1
5
6
37
28
4
92
12
4
12
4
15
19
204
446
276
56
110
0
1770
0
0
53
4
18
22
0
2
16
3
Feb
8
0
0
40
2
9
12
1
0
16
10
4O
1
1
0
3
8
36
31
3
113
11
4
14
4
11
19
193
480
134
27
146
0
1647
0
0
39
3
16
10
0
1
12
4
Mar
33
1
o
7
3
32
12
3
15
21
11
26
7
5
1
7
21
38
28
3
87
11
4
14
3
12
1
261
596
183
22
148
o
19o9
o
2
37
4
14
21
4
2
14
3
Apr
84
3
o
7
4
49
4
7
62
16
11
11
17
8
1
6
51
48
24
4
68
11
5
lO
4
14
o
169
396
89
22
168
2
2o41
o
4
42
2
23
13
16
1
13
3
May
87
3
0
5
5
59
4
6
66
24
9
15
14
8
2
21
47
77
24
5
211
12
5
16
3
19
33
197
195
221
17
201
469
2024
0
193
45
4
22
12
15
2
13
3
Jun
99
4
0
6
5
78
5
9
72
21
10
12
4
4
2
22
18
78
27
4
111
11
6
12
4
0
214
191
646
16
309
566
2492
0
147
5O
3
29
13
23
2
16
2
Jul
88
2
0
5
4
70
8
9
65
15
10
14
5
5
2
16
23
72
20
3
90
10
5
11
4
39
0
210
163
643
19
258
33O
2339
0
92
43
3
26
11
25
2
22
3
Aug
1
0
4
2
68
7
5
66
14
8
13
4
3
2
13
20
72
18
2
76
11
5
24
13
22
1
18g
297
463
15
260
308
1496
0
51
42
11
46
10
15
2
14
2
Sep
92
4
0
4
4
83
27
7
73
18
8
12
8
4
1
13
18
57
17
3
110
13
5
15
8
25
8
175
428
699
14
255
288
3363
0
78
3
67
8
37
8
14
3
Oct
87
5
0
8
2
57
5
8
61
16
9
13
7
5
2
13
19
59
24
5
117
13
6
12
4
23
13
111
337
354
15
155
131
1404
0
57
43
2
28
9
32
2
21
3
NOV
78
6
0
4
2
18
5
2
40
16
9
16
7
4
2
13
15
40
25
3
13o
12
9
12
3
16
18
388
34o
207
16
155
25
1251
0
39
41
4
10
17
1
14
2
Dec
27
5
o
26
2
9
6
1
o
12
11
15
2
1
1
7
5
37
23
2
85
12
8
12
3
5
16
426
542
353
12
94
o
11o4
o
115
2
21
7
o
12
12
2
Total
777
0
131
37
541
119
58
566
205
116
211
78
50
17
139
251
651
289
41
12g0
13g
66
164
57
245
128
2737
4411
4268
251
2259
2119
22840
0
778
523
45
146
184
37
181
33
Meter
67-05-4805
67-05-4830
67-05-4855
67-05-4880
67-05-4905
67-05-4930
67-05-4955
67-05-4980
67-05-5005
67-05-5030
67-05-5055
67-05-5080
67-05-5105
67-05-5130
67-05-5155
67-05-5180
67-05-5205
67-05-5215
67-05-5220
67-05-5230
67-05-5240
67-05-5280
67-05-5305
67-05-5325
67-05-5350
67-05-5360
67-10-0030
67-1 0-0045
67-10-0047
67-10-0055
67-10-0080
67-10-0105
67-10-0130
67-1 0-0155
67-10-0180
67-10-0205
67-10-0230
67-1 0.0255
67-10.0280
67-10-0305
67-1 0-0330
67-10-0355
67-1 0-0380
67-1 0-O405
Jan
7
10
7
2o
6
7
0
0
9
20
10
2
18
9
4
12
354
1
105
171
1018
170
2
180
0
14
10
584
0
7
3
5
3
0
34
3
2
0
2o
10
8
0
351
0
Feb
5
8
6
12
9
5
0
0
1
20
9
3
22
8
2
7
563
4
117
68
97O
167
2
146
0
14
11
656
8
7
2
4
11
0
27
3
3
0
36
8
4
0
339
0
Mar
5
8
7
23
11
8
o
o
2
41
20
3
23
lO
2
19
758
8
90
61
933
186
o
116
o
13
lO
518
3
7
3
4
5
o
26
5
3
o
22
8
4
o
282
o
Apr
5
7
6
26
8
5
1
o
2
32
34
2
24
8
2
24
892
25
77
39
968
194
1
7
30
12
30
504
6
51
3
4
5
o
22
4
2
o
24
9
4
o
349
o
May
3
7
6
25
13
6
0
0
5
49
31
2
20
11
0
33
1027
20
79
137
940
173
0
5
144
13
30
568
42
64
3
7
4
0
35
5
2
0
25
9
3
0
295
0
Jun
2
14
6
50
lO
5
o
o
7
46
36
3
13
11
o
57
lO97
24
91
227
1063
164
o
6
152
16
37
430
157
5o
4
7
8
o
30
5
4
1
35
11
5
o
38o
o
Jul
3
10
6
47
7
4
0
0
2
73
33
2
13
12
2
15
907
24
74
206
1065
187
0
4
171
13
276
88
51
3
10
7
0
31
6
2
0
24
7
6
0
296
0
Aug
3
10
7
36
6
4
0
0
3
51
31
3
15
6
1
14
681
56
7O
191
997
183
0
5
151
13
38
206
83
43
3
13
6
0
32
5
3
0
27
7
5
0
338
0
Sep
2
13
6
46
17
4
1
0
3
64
37
3
16
7
0
19
827
16
73
229
1041
165
0
6
109
13
57
157
120
67
4
68
5
0
12
3
4
24
9
4
0
474
0
Oct
3
12
7
31
8
5
0
0
2
76
33
3
18
11
0
15
676
15
78
217
906
161
0
6
93
13
85
114
98
57
6
19
8
0
27
6
3
0
23
9
3
0
468
0
Nov
2
15
6
3o
68
5
o
o
2
37
25
3
20
12
o
18
682
lO
5o
lO3
1119
158
o
lO
59
17
15o
145
53
4
14
7
o
5
3
1
26
8
6
o
507
o
Dec
2
17
5
3o
25
4
o
o
2
58
12
3
18
lO
o
18
451
o
o
64
794
328
o
6
35
15
1
284
32
22
5
37
6
o
36
5
3
o
22
12
2
o
450
o
Total
42
131
75
376
188
62
2
0
4O
567
311
32
220
115
13
251
8915
203
9O4
1713
11814
2236
5
497
944
166
417
~7
782
479
43
192
75
0
378
64
33
6
3O8
107
54
0
4529
0
Meter
67-10-0430
67-10-0435
67-10-0440
67-10-0455
67-10-O47O
67-10-0480
67-10-0490
67-10-0505
67-10-0530
67-10-0540
67-10-0555
67-10-0580
67-10-0630
67-10-0655
67-10-0680
67-10-0705
67-10-0730
67-10-0755
67-10-0780
67-10-0805
67-10.0830
67-10-0855
67-10-0880
67-10.0890
67-10.0900
67-10-0905
67-10-0955
67-10-0980
67-10-0990
67-10-0995
67-10-0998
67-10-1000
67-10-1005
67-10-1030
67-10-1055
67-10-1070
67-10-1080
67-10-1083
67-10-1085
67-10-1090
67-10-1092
67-10-1094
67-10-1110
67-10-1115
Jan
9
o
285
o
522
o
45
34
12o
177
o
o
16
63
o
5
14
7
5
15
8
5
o
o
o
o
o
o
3
243
29
131
o
o
o
o
o
5o3
2
2o
75
773
o
90
Feb
8
0
0
0
438
0
4
32
117
258
3
0
19
85
0
5
14
9
5
17
10
4
0
32
0
0
0
0
6
251
99
114
0
0
0
0
0
540
50
94
77
671
41
87
Mar
8
3
o
1
684
o
35
35
11o
118
o
o
21
40
o
7
12
8
7
11
21
5
o
9
31
o
o
o
11
306
117
139
o
o
o
o
o
543
63
118
71
630
53
78
Apr
7
o
372
o
602
o
59
27
lO7
168
49
o
17
78
o
7
13
13
lO
4
12
3
o
47
134
o
o
o
46o
211
243
121
o
o
o
o
o
5o5
134
155
28
632
95
May
6
0
158
0
593
0
81
35
110
229
92
0
18
106
0
4
14
17
16
2
18
5
0
77
121
0
0
0
175
171
327
115
0
0
0
0
0
527
193
316
24
701
136
66
Jun
11
13
3O5
1
862
0
165
57
134
229
161
0
19
120
0
6
26
22
17
1
22
3
0
100
208
0
0
0
90
288
536
124
0
0
0
0
0
694
486
31
820
247
69
Jul
10
100
436
0
528
0
188
162
116
195
133
0
20
9O
0
10
18
16
11
3
15
4
0
78
88
0
0
0
89
227
416
107
0
0
0
0
0
726
298
323
48
701
153
'69
Aug
12
94
402
0
424
0
173
187
105
140
112
0
16
101
0
8
13
18
13
1
17
3
0
49
99
0
0
0
69
228
495
86
0
0
0
0
0
542
262
321
625
130
58
Sep
14
115
491
0
514
0
172
153
131
166
119
0
23
115
0
7
19
13
10
1
14
3
0
54
105
0
0
0
86
294
527
116
0
0
0
0
0
623
336
617
74
696
187
86
Oct
16
104
381
2
458
0
144
35
112
199
118
0
36
115
0
7
14
11
9
5
11
3
0
52
105
0
0
0
73
226
406
125
0
0
0
0
0
588
272
529
43
567
160
75
Nov
18
58
59
o
298
o
84
95
13o
212
32
o
19
86
o
4
14
6
3
2
6
3
o
56
28
o
o
o
20
250
87
133
o
o
o
o
o
576
47
lO7
28
533
39
115
Dec
lO
2
o
1
378
o
2
72
45
197
o
o
17
45
o
9
13
5
2
2
17
12
o
68
o
o
o
o
1
231
1
113
o
o
o
o
o
6Ol
1
81
o
567
o
97
Total
129
489
2889
5
6301
0
1152
924
1337
2288
819
0
241
1044
0
79
184
145
108
171
53
0
622
919
0
0
0
1083
2926
3283
1424
0
0
0
0
0
6968
2102
3167
553
7916
1241
954
Meter
67-10-1130
67-10-1155
67-10-1180
67-10-1205
67-10.1230
67-10-1240
67-10.1243
67-10-1245
67-10-1255
67-10-1280
67-10.1305
67-10.1330
67-10-1355
67-10-1380
67-10-1430
67-10-1480
67-10-1506
67-10-1530
67-10-1555
67-10-1580
67-10-1605
67-10-1620
67-10-1630
67-10-1635
67-10-1640
67-10-1655
67-10-1750
67-10-1755
67-10-1805
67-10-1955
67-10-1980
67-10.1990
67-10-2005
67-10-2030
67-10-2055
67-10.2080
67-10-2105
67-10.213O
67-10-2155
67-10-2180
67-10.2205
67-10-2230
67-10-2255
67-10-2270
Jan
25
3
2
o
o
lO4
1215
o
31
4
62
84
27
12
363
295
o
168
o
2
o
o
333
260
13
36
13
11
73
165
45
1
29
o
26
13
o
o
19
18
9
35
26
397
Feb
11
3
1
0
0
108
1323
0
4O
7
45
52
29
12
296
104
0
197
0
2
0
0
261
357
7
39
13
25
73
148
155
0
43
0
16
12
0
0
21
16
10
37
22
445
Mar
9
2
1
0
0
106
1414
0
35
7
49
53
27
12
296
139
0
156
0
2
0
0
245
308
15
56
13
11
65
158
69
2
32
0
13
18
0
0
22
12
9
32
21
443
Apr
12
3
2
o
o
145
1465
o
45
6
67
70
28
11
320
181
o
174
o
1
o
o
222
331
48
35
32
11
73
229
18
o
29
o
11
16
o
o
24
lO
7
14
26
425
May
9
3
1
0
0
136
1565
0
47
2
72
87
32
13
364
151
0
252
0
0
0
0
165
436
72
72
42
16
131
274
24
1
52
0
17
19
0
0
29
11
9
28
416
Jun
7
2
2
0
0
424
1889
0
59
3
84
97
48
23
413
154
0
274
0
0
0
0
374
495
100
157
43
4
111
364
42
1
111
0
28
23
0
0
30
13
10
38
45
503
Jul
7
4
2
0
0
396
1678
0
69
4
88
85
42
56
475
24O
0
394
0
0
0
0
336
423
82
70
4
83
324
45
0
99
0
37
11
0
0
2
13
0
37
'496
Aug
4
2
2
0
0
282
1445
0
37
3
91
83
45
42
517
327
0
410
0
0
0
0
213
465
72
26
33
2
64
282
40
1
86
0
25
19
0
0
3
17
0
18
42
466
Sep
25
3
1
0
0
431
1858
0
61
2
121
90
60
48
533
375
0
481
0
0
0
0
202
96
18
3
87
345
57
0
96
0
26
23
0
0
3
14
0
31
25
483
Oct
4
1
0
0
484
1590
0
83
4
74
81
28
501
23O
0
285
0
0
0
0
56
339
84
16
48
3
74
271
42
2
78
0
21
25
0
0
4
15
1
28
37
423
NOV
6
2
2
0
0
?75
1706
0
41
3
57
97
57
15
475
2O8
o
238
0
0
o
o
51
371
87
15
3
73
277
23
1
42
0
5
12
0
o
3
14
o
3O
23
276
Dec
21
2
2
o
o
R2
1611
o
34
1
50
87
53
lO
453
146
o
250
o
o
o
o
12
249
3o
13
21
3
65
276
14
o
11
o
9
16
o
o
3
16
o
27
29
392
Total
170
33
19
0
0
2973
18759
0
582
46
860
966
492
282
5006
2550
0
3279
0
7
0
0
2470
4478
706
553
40O
96
972
3113
574
9
708
0
234
207
0
0
163
169
55
352
387
5165
Meter
67-10-2280
67-10-2305
67-10-2330
67-10-2355
67-10-2405
67-10-2430
67-10-2455
67-10-2480
67-10-2490
67-10-2505
67-10-2530
67-10-2555
67-10-2580
67-10-2605
67-10-2630
67-10-2680
67-10-2705
67-10-2730
67-10-2755
67-10-2780
67-10-2805
67-10-2830
67-10-2855
67-10-2880
67-10-2905
67-10-2930
67-10-2955
67-10-2980
67-10-3005
67-10-3055
67-10-3080
67-10-3105
67-10-3130
67-10-3155
67-10-3180
67-10-3205
67-10-3230
67-10-3255
67-10-3280
67-10-3305
67-10-3330
67-10-3355
67-10-3380
67-10-3405
Jan
0
0
0
0
0
23
108
123
94
14
75
0
24
43
108
44
34
130
0
264
150
28
2
0
791
156
6
455
10
1
43
2
15
19
139
35
27
2o5
30
0
28
11
101
8
Feb
0
0
0
0
0
27
40
10
72
14
179
0
23
122
135
35
17
106
0
52
155
18
3
2
721
168
8
324
8
3
4
3
3
2O
130
38
27
187
0
3
15
70
31
Mar
o
o
o
o
o
24
80
59
71
12
142
o
23
17
143
112
2o
151
o
53
158
27
2
1
783
162
5
379
28
3
lO
2
3
37
41
39
25
65
o
12
15
71
12
Apr
o
o
o
o
o
22
2
lO6
lol
24
164
o
14
138
269
194
41
174
o
135
177
49
2
1
832
205
5
499
29
2
26
2
1
lO3
36
26
12o
o
24
15
152
19
May
0
0
0
0
0
26
19
122
136
12
153
0
43
177
294
196
72
147
0
333
176
46
3
2
782
211
5
477
38
2
21
8
75
49
128
29
26
108
39
0
29
15
151
7
Jun
o
o
o
o
o
28
18
154
173
17
182
o
30
279
369
220
13o
19o
o
483
222
79
1
1
873
279
7
731
64
3
37
3
67
58
92
30
31
81
59
o
56
20
164
11
Jul
0
0
0
0
0
25
57
129
120
14
213
0
24
107
398
223
145
264
0
373
142
2
1
899
224
5
709
51
2
24
4
30
51
108
12
27
213
53
0
48
18
159
13
Aug
0
0
0
0
0
45
53
117
138
4O
193
0
22
174
374
198
123
265
0
271
158
40
1
2
864
217
5
596
37
2
38
4
24
42
121
12
27
163
7O
0
12
155
9
Sep
0
0
0
0
0
31
48
132
159
15
137
0
28
252
399
263
72
244
0
348
146
45
2
1
9O9
224
7
647
5O
2
62
4
36
52
82
15
3O
2O6
69
0
12
176
10
Oct
0
0
0
0
0
19
20
122
137
17
161
0
32
127
219
249
49
221
0
383
290
40
4
2
829
181
5
623
27
3
2O
6
53
5O
121
15
28
166
59
0
23
10
134
3
Nov
o
o
o
o
o
31
30
115
lO8
12
185
o
22
84
163
64
25
252
o
169
305
11
4
1
946
16o
7
427
18
2
6
3
6
27
95
33
30
3
47
o
17
lO
87
3
Dec
o
o
o
o
o
20
9
13
46
o
lO7
o
24
o
59
62
4
175
o
21
289
3
5
1
488
166
5
362
8
2
4
3
13
37
37
51
28
3
35
o
3
11
52
17
Total
0
0
0
0
0
371
484
1202
1355
191
1891
0
309
1520
2930
1860
732
2319
0
2885
2368
430
31
15
9717
2353
70
6229
368
27
295
326
490
1197
345
332
1509
0
341
164
1472
143
Meter
67-10-3430
67-1 0-346O
67-10-3465
67-1 0-3480
67-15-0030
67-15-0055
67-15-0080
67-1 5-0105
67-1 5-0130
67-15-0155
67-15-0180
67-15-0205
67-15-0230
67-1 5-0255
67-1 5-0260
67-15-0265
67-1 5-0280
67-1 5-0290
67-1 5-0305
67-15-0315
67-1 5-0330
67-15-0345
67-1 5-0355
67-15-0405
67-1 5-0430
67-1 5-0440
67-1 5-0450
67-1 5-0455
67-1 5-0480
67-1 5-O505
67-15-0515
67-15-0530
67-15-0555
67-1 5-0560
67-1 5-0580
67-1 5-0605
67-15-0630
67-1 5-0655
67-1 5-0682
67-1 5-O7O5
67-1 5-0730
67-1 5-0735
67-1 5-0745
67-15-0755
Jan
37
116
53
0
4
5
12
11
12
14
31
6
1
21
21
104
18
10
108
0
71
3
7
13
2645
0
0
3
162
5
3
19
0
69
5
0
5
210
9
0
130
7
270
11
Feb
43
85
0
5
5
11
9
14
15
32
6
3
29
29
105
20
16
110
0
31
3
12
8
2487
2
0
0
133
6
3
26
0
69
5
0
26
224
8
0
221
13
253
10
Mar
29
111
23
o
4
4
9
8
12
15
29
5
4
21
26
94
26
13
91
o
33
4
27
8
2342
4
4
o
148
5
3
40
o
64
2
o
24
2Ol
8
o
17o
7
258
22
Apr
lO
48
23
o
8
5
13
8
16
14
3o
5
4
25
38
lOO
138
9
49
6
28
4
o
16
2334
8
6
o
151
6
2
67
o
58
3
o
17
198
7
o
95
16
235
49
May
4
126
63
0
4
5
14
15
20
52
31
6
4
19
45
95
52
15
74
7
31
8
20
23
2509
13
6
0
160
7
4
86
0
79
1
0
17
182
10
0
97
23
23O
55
Jun
6
134
126
o
9
5
15
18
25
64
36
4
3
23
85
114
55
24
50
lO
37
9
22
3o
2777
18
6
o
168
7
3
57
o
lO3
3
o
17
262
8
o
114
188
253
48
Jul
4
83
237
0
6
6
14
17
20
51
42
5
3
22
63
101
58
18
49
8
33
8
7
27
2589
14
6
0
150
10
4
39
0
90
4
0
15
213
8
0
150
167
222
6O
Aug
4
71
88
0
4
5
14
15
23
45
43
4
4
21
65
101
56
9
9O
7
27
27
41
28
2646
15
6
0
145
11
3
6O
0
82
4
0
2O
227
7
0
136
276
211
53
Sep
4
72
87
0
6
5
17
17
24
46
6
3
24
90
109
58
9
29
9
19
11
22
29
2617
12
6
0
151
22
4
10
0
78
7
0
23
229
9
0
156
355
252
31
Oct
5
75
73
0
4
5
18
14
19
24
67
5
3
25
74
102
55
7
32
8
30
5
7
28
2537
13
7
0
158
9
3
0
0
71
16
0
18
197
9
0
215
366
287
27
Nov
5
56
74
o
5
6
19
15
18
34
79
7
4
23
9o
136
43
6
37
6
69
5
5
21
2424
15
7
o
156
16
5
o
o
65
1
o
14
219
9
o
127
513
288
33
Dec
3
52
o
o
3
5
17
7
13
2o
95
4
3
23
89
94
14
5
48
o
17
2
1
2
2253
14
6
o
159
5
4
o
o
48
1
o
13
148
lO
o
92
o
319
28
Total
154
1029
891
0
62
61
173
154
216
392
561
63
39
276
715
1255
593
141
767
61
426
89
171
233
30160
128
6O
3
1841
109
41
404
0
876
52
0
209
2510
102
0
1703
1931
3078
427
Meter
67-15-0780
67-15-0805
67-15-0830
67-15-0840
67-1 5-0845
67-15-0847
6/'-15-0855
67-15-0905
67-15-0915
67-15-0920
67-1 5-0925
67-1 5-0930
67-15-0955
67-15-0980
67-1 5-1030
67-1 5-1055
67-1 5-1080
67-1 5-1130
67-15-1150
67-15-1180
67-15-1185
67-15-1205
67-1 5-1230
67-1 5-1245
67-15-1280
67-15-1305
67-1 5-1330
67-15-1365
67-15-1380
67-1 5-1405
67-1 5-1430
67-15-1455
67-15-1480
67-15-1505
67-1 5-1530
67-15-1555
67-1 5-1580
67-15-1605
67-15-1630
67-1 5-1680
67-1 5-17O5
67-15-1730
67-1 5-1750
67-15-1755
Jan
17
17
2o
42
2
0
5
66
0
0
91
69
10
6
6
6
7
9
32
0
265
54
0
411
2
7
25
18
30
13
9
0
27
0
2
14
15
3
8
11
8
7
132
0
Feb
14
18
19
45
2
2
4
46
0
2
120
40
16
5
6
11
18
9
35
0
271
29
0
395
2
8
7
8
12
4
0
23
0
1
13
13
2
9
12
2
6
152
0
Mar
2o
16
12
44
5
3
4
81
1
4
73
18
21
6
7
9
13
7
33
o
267
26
o
389
2
11
3
9
7
13
6
o
23
o
1
15
5
3
8
15
4
4
133
o
Apr
46
13
12
59
2
1
5
28
1
2
71
43
14
5
7
lO
17
26
38
o
256
31
o
369
3
lO
3
21
5
12
5
o
24
o
5
16
25
3
9
13
12
5
135
o
May
43
14
12
55
4
1
46
28
0
1
79
41
15
6
6
20
18
10
46
0
237
10
0
3O5
2
13
5
21
4
13
4
0
23
0
13
16
12
3
9
13
13
6
120
11
Jun
55
18
12
65
6
2
36
28
1
o
85
75
66
6
7
4
18
lO
5o
o
262
14
o
551
3
9
4
16
6
15
1
o
2o
o
5
17
23
2
9
19
18
7
98
3
Jul
38
15
10
61
15
1
31
22
0
1
78
69
14
6
6
8
18
9
48
0
247
26
0
288
2
9
10
12
4
13
7
0
14
0
3
12
4
0
8
12
24
6
92
13
Aug
40
16
6
135
7
1
13
26
0
1
75
71
11
8
6
12
20
12
42
0
265
28
0
339
3
10
3
8
5
12
9
0
11
0
4
14
19
3
7
11
22
5
98
1
Sep
43
14
5
52
19
0
2
27
1
0
86
77
9
6
6
10
17
10
46
0
365
21
0
567
2
12
4
12
6
16
6
0
15
0
5
13
24
2
9
12
23
7
112
0
Oct
45
26
6
53
4
0
3
28
0
0
89
73
14
6
5
14
14
9
0
303
10
0
372
2
12
3
11
4
11
5
0
17
0
3
14
28
4
11
12
22
4
127
0
Nov
48
17
6
45
56
0
2
21
1
1
98
32
22
6
6
18
2
10
46
0
323
12
0
327
3
9
7
14
5
12
5
0
16
0
3
14
3
6
10
12
24
6
148
0
Dec
41
14
2
33
51
o
2
17
o
1
82
17
20
6
5
62
17
11
36
o
251
7
o
3o7
1
9
4
9
4
9
6
o
27
o
1
lO
16
4
lO
9
8
6
12o
o
Total
450
198
122
689
173
11
153
418
5
13
1027
625
232
72
73
184
179
132
496
0
3312
268
0
4620
27
119
78
159
124
151
67
0
24O
0
46
168
187
35
107
151
180
69
1467
28
I I I I I 1 I I I i i I I I I I I i i
Meter Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
67-15-1780 10 24 11 14 12 13 12 16 9 15 10 36 182
67-15-1805 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 8 4 5 6' 4 64
67-15-1855 2 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 4 4 2 9 42
67-1 5-1880 2 2 I 3 3 2 3 2 4 2 3 2 29
67-15-1905 2 2 2 2 4 2 I 5 5 6 5 4 40
67-1 5-1930 I 2 3 2 2 I I 2 2 3 3 3 25
67-15-19bb 3 3 2 1 2 I 1 0 I I 0 0 15
67-15-1980 3 7 8 8 9 9 I 2 10 8 11 9 85
67-1 5-2005 106 132 103 99 87 91 83 80 107 100 119 99 1206
67-1 5.2055 4 4 4 7 11 9 10 7 15 23 22 8 124
67-15-2080 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-21 O0 13 13 27 37 36 39 35 38 55 39 33 30 395
67-1 5-2105 598 734 690 564 628 643 584 604 573 716 675 545 7554
67-15-2155 26 20 16 8 9 10 3 4 2 7 8 11 124
67-15-2180 19 9 13 29 18 16 12 13 12 9 11 25 186
67-15-2205 7 9 6 9 9 9 7 9 8 9 9 10 101
67-1 5-2230 31 27 21 33 20 13 20 23 23 26 25 25 287
67-15-2255 85 82 86 71 54 59 59 78 48 35 47 21 725
67-15-2265 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 3 4 4 43
67-15-2280 2 2 I 0 4 3 1 1 2 3 5 2 26
67-1 5-2305 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 33
67-15-2330 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-2355 8 7 7 7 8 8 8 7 10 8 9 8 95
67-1 5-2380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-1 5-2405 I 2 3 3 14 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 40
67-1 5-2430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-2455 0 1 1 I I I 2 0 1 1 2 2 13
67-1 5-2480 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 44
67-1 5-2505 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 22
67-1 5-2555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-1 5-2580 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-2605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-1 5.2630 3 4 5 3 4 3 2 3 2 I 1 I 32
67-1 5-2655 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 48
67-1 5-2680 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-2705 24 30 28 25 29 32 26 27 27 27 27 30 332
67-1 5-2730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-15-2755 19 17 14 13 16 18 17 12 0 0 0 0 126
67-20-0030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-20-0055 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-20-0115 10 16 11 10 13 17 9 10 9 16 9 7 137
67-20-0120 9 0 12 26 41 58 34 35 37 35 27 0 314
67-20-0125 15 8 22 58 53 63 57 57 60 56 48 5 502
67-20-0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meter
67-20-0155
67-20-0205
67-20-0230
67-20-0305
67-20-0330
67-?0-0355
67-20-0365
67-20-0380
67-20-0405
67-20-0430
67-20-0435
67-20-0440
67-20-0445
67-20-0455
67-20-0480
67-20-0485
67-20-0490
67-20-0495
67-20-0500
67-20-0505
67-20-0530
67-20-0560
67-20-0565
67-20-0601
67-20-0755
67-20-0780
67-20-0805
67-20-0835
67-20-0855
67-20-0880
67-20-0905
67-20-0930
67-20-0955
67-20-0980
67-20-1005
67-20-1030
67-20-1035
67-20-1040
67-20-1042
67-20-1045
67-20-1 O48
67-2O- 1050
67-20-1055
67-20-1 O75
Jan
0
39
43
99
149
212
4
15
0
0
6851
0
0
0
0
0
0
428
0
0
197
353
0
12024
10
3
578
858
611
45
39
9
71
117
9
5
73
0
416
0
25
4
124
98
Feb
0
35
39
187
100
20O
9
6
0
0
7103
0
0
0
0
0
0
341
0
0
155
37O
0
12238
5
2
566
856
610
47
45
10
185
125
12
0
65
1
784
0
0
3
91
95
Mar
22
89
40
125
73
219
4
5
o
o
6840
o
o
o
o
o
o
361
226
o
153
376
o
11190
37
17
596
784
502
43
43
17
32
lO4
13
o
48
o
696
o
o
4
167
lO9
Apr
49
157
48
193
86
198
7
18
32
o
6686
o
o
o
o
o
o
343
248
o
163
361
o
7958
29
78
679
8Ol
579
45
41
22
169
124
11
285
151
o
341
o
24
5
288
lO4
May
15
150
77
133
119
248
6
88
14
0
7243
0
0
0
0
0
0
354
974
0
247
448
0
7718
148
57
7O8
97O
699
45
35
37
2O5
192
21
53
268
1
406
0
42
5
353
115
Jun
45
272
103
296
146
407
13
93
96
0
7832
0
0
0
0
0
0
466
370
0
259
747
0
8476
212
79
754
1057
896
36
6
300
242
23
123
409
0
439
0
48
6
123
Jul
83
325
101
255
139
409
9
12
102
0
6965
0
0
0
0
0
0
392
319
0
229
555
0
7871
109
94
682
935
687
39
50
17
151
349
20
161
352
0
419
0
105
5
412
'123
Aug
33
239
85
204
112
338
7
48
82
0
6897
0
0
0
0
0
0
396
392
0
241
551
0
7272
121
86
629
871
631
38
31
28
214
195
21
140
304
0
428
0
107
4
426
127
Sep
55
187
94
221
131
409
7
38
81
0
7773
0
0
0
0
0
0
323
537
0
266
516
0
7924
76
91
719
957
901
41
47
57
267
126
23
148
358
0
418
0
113
3
525
131
Oct
167
121
117
117
301
7
10
32
0
7048
0
0
0
0
0
0
311
225
0
184
539
0
8051
89
79
708
9O2
701
50
54
66
135
98
24
136
193
0
541
0
90
7
494
122
NOV
19
94
90
87
lO0
232
456
3
34
0
671o
o
o
o
o
o
o
309
62
0
13o
551
0
7290
191
31
686
499
4o
47
70
89
83
20
112
52
1
38O
0
94
9
250
122
Dec
o
27
68
57
lO8
133
3
2
11
o
5722
o
o
o
o
o
o
340
1
o
34
470
o
8693
11
8
568
853
3o4
40
56
3
o
57
6
11
8
o
349
o
o
7
90
115
Total
361
1781
909
1974
1380
3306
532
338
484
0
83670
0
0
0
0
0
0
4364
3354
0
2258
5837
0
106705
1038
625
7873
10688
7620
5O7
524
342
1818
1812
203
1174
2281
3
5617
0
648
62
3664
1384
Meter
67-20-1355
67-20-1365
67-20-1380
67-20-1390
67-20-1395
67-20-1405
67-20-1415
67-20-1420
67-20-1430
67-20-1445
67-20-1450
67-20-1465
67-20-1480
67-20-1505
67-20-1530
67-20-1555
67-20-1580
67-20-1590
67-20-1605
67-20-1630
67-20-1655
67-20-1680
67-20-1690
67-20-1695
67-20-1705
67-20-2000
67-20-2030
67-20-2055
67-20-2075
67-20-2080
67-20-2105
67-20-2125
67-20-2130
67-20-2155
67-20-2180
67-20-22O5
67-20-2230
67-20-2255
67-20-2265
67-20-2280
67-20-230O
67-20-2305
67-20-2330
67-20-2355
Jan
46
15o
25
6
o
23
1
o
99
98
1660
2023
56
54
391
o
1
o
o
1
13o
o
561
2o9
o
lol
o
152
o
61
2519
o
61
73
5
68
17
17
7o
157
o
47
o
117
Feb
0
124
45
6
0
22
0
0
22
25
1696
1871
0
55
331
0
1
0
0
0
109
0
271
1
0
20
1
113
0
52
2986
0
75
52
5
83
25
20
63
5
0
53
0
49
Mar
'39
131
43
6
4
24
1
o
20
23
197o
1731
91
50
381
o
14
13
o
1
lO5
o
12o
65
o
39
o
141
o
55
2905
o
68
36
5
86
19
14
62
5
o
30
o
45
Apr
lO6
155
138
6
15
9o
1
30
34
230
1729
1664
25o
50
43o
o
33
39
o
o
lO4
o
36
311
o
134
1
248
o
81
2504
o
lO2
42
23
96
17
29
61
4
o
71
o
May
135
167
140
7
64
91
1
4O
12
493
1976
1903
285
31
363
0
32
39
0
0
105
0
34
265
0
137
0
243
0
130
2483
0
164
95
45
94
18
29
59
6
0
67
0
74
Jun
176
180
159
6
34
138
0
46
369
381
2258
2365
488
34
390
0
41
42
16
1
106
0
42
397
0
154
1
275
0
145
3081
0
299
121
63
150
16
36
68
236
0
85
0
7O
Jul
100
174
140
8
28
128
1
41
336
35O
2277
2284
453
30
374
0
39
5
1
95
0
29
396
0
150
0
252
0
141
3229
0
143
182
38
117
20
35
63
242
0
166
0
65
Aug
146
157
136
6
98
106
1
39
336
353
2337
2436
377
36
366
0
37
49
1
98
1
52
411
0
95
1
204
0
137
3069
0
155
82
5O
74
17
6O
160
0
162
0
Sep
161
130
148
10
37
122
1
0
197
473
2517
2516
324
34
410
0
42
4O
42
0
101
0
34
408
0
156
1
171
0
137
3098
0
144
95
39
87
18
34
88
156
0
192
0
Oct
131
149
144
6
26
101
0
0
0
659
2559
2241
230
33
398
0
14
21
15
1
103
0
41
375
0
146
1
123
0
139
3238
0
107
49
27
7O
27
36
46
69
0
166
0
47
NOV
6o
325
79
15
17
45
2
1
0
127
2200
2605
97
32
341
0
6
4
1
o
101
0
45
68
o
51
o
115
o
46
2995
0
76
40
5
36
23
23
0
34
o
173
o
75
Dec
o
317
o
8
o
22
1
o
1
26
1670
2133
o
39
347
o
o
o
o
o
82
o
144
2328
o
18
o
95
o
54
2619
o
5o
23
5
37
25
12
58
4
o
30
o
18
Total
1100
2159
1197
9O
323
912
10
197
1426
3238
24849
25772
2651
478
4522
0
272
274
128
6
1239
1
1409
5234
0
1201
6
2132
0
1178
34726
0
89O
310
998
242
319
698
1078
0
1242
0
757
Meter
67-20-2380
67-20-2405
67-20-2430
67-20-2455
67-20-2480
67-20-2505
67-20-2530
67-20-2555
67-20-2580
67-20-2605
67-20-2630
67-20-2650
67-20-2655
67-20-2670
67-20-2680
67-20-2705
67-20-2730
67-20-2755
67-20-2780
67-20-2905
67-20-2910
67-20-2930
67-20-2955
67-20-2980
67-20-3005
67-20.3030
67-20-3055
67-20.3065
67-20-3140
67-20-3145
67-20.3150
67-20-3151
67-20-3155
67-20.3205
67-20.3280
67-20-3355
67-20-4005
67-2O-4O3O
67-25-0710
67-25-O72O
67-25-O75O
67-25-0752
67-25-1400
67-25-1425
Jan
11
50
29
18
81
o
o
12
o
311
38
1
41
o
11
1
o
60
51
o
137
69
95
257
2
2
8
4
364
o
o
o
42
1663
142
97
o
o
6
609
o
o
13
68
Feb
18
37
29
12
8
0
0
8
0
424
39
1
48
0
16
2
0
34
81
0
78
77
98
274
35
2
10
5
427
0
0
0
45
1739
209
108
0
0
8
8O4
0
0
4
105
Mar
26
34
28
12
19
0
10
9
0
399
67
2
45
0
22
3
0
50
84
0
120
83
95
267
9
6
49
4
395
0
0
0
0
1796
185
97
0
0
8
0
0
6
172
Apr
53
29
29
14
6o
o
44
8
o
387
126
o
47
o
15
15
o
53
151
o
216
78
91
329
15
18
82
8
464
o
o
o
96
168o
193
93
o
o
28
782
o
o
13
224
May
53
28
34
19
56
0
42
9
0
441
2O3
61
197
1
47
43
0
58
153
0
247
68
79
323
53
11
145
18
427
0
0
0
122
1765
184
60
0
0
65
755
0
0
37
162
Jun
65
17
34
16
68
o
47
lO
o
523
270
95
346
3
48
46
20
32
192
o
224
161
91
343
9
24
181
20
456
o
5
o
245
2135
208
lO9
o
o
279
872
o
o
123
Jul
60
24
33
62
59
0
11
0
448
238
85
30O
4
23
25
25
29
142
0
212
215
84
317
7
15
101
18
537
0
1
0
302
2281
188
99
0
0
213
780
0
0
64
'167
Aug
51
2O
34
15
58
0
12
0
388
241
80
288
0
26
42
68
27
143
0
298
175
78
335
2
20
86
17
531
0
34
0
273
2405
178
106
0
0
98
796
0
0
61
107
Sep
64
19
46
24
0
35
10
0
42O
243
8O
289
0
33
31
120
22
183
0
25O
67
86
349
1
26
96
12
593
0
4
5
96
1754
163
108
0
0
196
888
0
0
68
190
Oct
62
15
25
39
39
0
31
11
0
414
263
73
143
0
34
61
108
15
110
0
198
72
83
3O5
24
26
77
24
618
17
3
3
138
1641
187
104
0
0
5O
665
0
0
190
Nov
15
16
37
25
16
0
14
13
0
4O3
163
83
109
0
12
29
57
13
48
0
212
125
93
274
13
18
35
4
620
134
5
3
45
1490
2O9
118
0
0
2
652
0
0
27
187
Dec
11
o
26
12
7
o
o
18
o
360
94
82
133
o
8
lO
56
18
23
o
229
63
48
240
14
2
23
3
544
31
9
6
1
1176
189
6
o
o
5
493
o
o
o
61
Total
489
289
384
268
515
0
311
131
0
4918
1985
643
1986
8
295
308
454
411
1361
0
2421
1253
1021
3613
184
170
893
137
5976
182
61
17
1405
21525
2235
1105
0
0
958
8944
0
0
406
1756
Meter
67-25-1435
67-25-1450
67-25-1475
67-25-1485
67-25-1490
67-25-1500
67-25-1510
67-25-1700
67-25-1800
67-25-1990
67-25-2000
67-25-2005
67-25-2010
67-25-2015
67-25-2020
67-25-3000
67-25-3100
67-25-3105
67-25-4000
67-25-4025
67-25-4035
67-25-4100
67-25-4125
67-25-4246
67-25-4248
67-25-4249
67-25-425O
67-25-4252
67-25-4254
67-25-4258
67-25-4259
67-25-4260
67-25-4263
67-25-4270
67-25-4280
67-25-429O
67-25-4295
67-25-43O0
67-25-4305
67-30-4045
67-304055
67-304080
67-30-4155
67-304230
Jan
58
192
157
31
317
21
186
55
0
3
172
160
71
41
240
0
50
108
0
209
0
708
0
0
11
0
24
0
28
520
0
924
0
106
426
23
265
0
2
27
0
0
22
0
Feb
7
77
63
34
244
18
177
51
0
6
221
172
71
353
0
1
149
1
204
0
568
0
0
25
0
21
0
14
464
0
1495
0
106
427
23
191
0
82
24
0
0
21
0
Mar
11
178
145
12
258
9
164
57
o
8
194
149
80
38
36o
1
38
133
3
229
o
561
o
o
27
o
73
o
24
593
16
1342
o
99
414
23
206
o
95
24
o
o
20
o
Apr
237
689
561
69
234
93
235
54
o
7
213
157
80
38
566
o
165
172
2
208
o
522
o
o
24
o
24
15o
58
570
55
1243
o
56
374
65
211
o
79
23
o
o
16
o
May
227
757
613
125
234
98
212
54
0
7
188
139
79
31
831
2
241
233
24
292
0
589
41
0
13
0
lO0
35O
68
655
129
1438
0
196
357
90
227
0
92
24
0
0
11
0
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
288 240 116 310 218 42 1 1755
1345 1439 1492 1509 980 452 0 9110
1093 1159 1193 1192 732 343 3 7254
226 230 206 137 119 107 76 1372
293 238 227 313 336 310 187 3191
164 235 217 13R 102 111 73 1274
248 200 217 228 207 205 172 2451
62 62 62 95 56 51 45 704
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 4 2 I 3 3 3 56
220 180 169 138 101 96 97 1989
202 157 178 201 197 208 201 2121
87 76 69 73 73 70 69 898
36 28 25 32 31 30 27 401
1465 1453 1276 1131 811 787 121 9394
I 0 I 0 1 0 I 7
359 348 388 391 406 82 2 2471
231 200 213 262 271 232 156 2360
720 589 381 461 371 322 0 2874
298 268 229 245 229 184 145 2740
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
625 513 486 526 555 452 218 6323
65 41 3 14 9 0 0 173
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
71 20 11 7 11 14 42 276
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
113 671 504 222 155 144 137 2188
440 422 308 320 240 136 12 2378
162 90 64 74 61 34 3 680
861 835 788 869 1029 1024 532 8740
160 163 158 166 87 50 0 984
1~ 1099 781 820 726 852 774 12938
0 382 1031 1180 1099 908 726 5326
256 240 266 238 95 55 I 1714
347 557 564 570 485 493 470 5484
152 144 117 146 130 31 0 944
284 246 196 177 190 203 173 2569
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
235 237 223 266 234 274 305 2124
89 88 86 90 93 74 36 678
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 12 11 13 19 22 11 191
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meter
67-30-4255
67-30-4280
67-30-4500
67-30-4600
67-35-3530
67-35-3555
67-35-3580
67-35-3605
67-35-3630
67-35-3655
67-35-3680
67-35-3705
67-35-3761
67-35-3765
67-35-3770
67-35-3776
67-35-3780
67-35-3805
67-35-3820
67-35-3830
67-35-3840
67-35-3855
67-35-4530
67-35-4535
67-35-4625
67-35-4635
67-35-4645
67-35-4655
67-35-4680
67-35-4695
67-35-4725
67-35-4730
67-35-4775
67-35-4785
67-35-4800
67-35-4825
67-35-4850
67-35-4925
67-35-4950
67-35-5000
67-35-5050
67-35-5090
67-35-5100
67-35-5105
Jan
o
o
72
o
37
9
o
o
4
16
76
26
25
23
265
29
o
68
o
o
313
o
o
o
o
57
o
133
14
46
99
35
37
13
12
16o
4
28
2
o
12
11
23
4
Feb
0
0
76
0
26
2
0
0
11
18
63
22
25
22
28
3O
0
12
0
0
305
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
22
75
59
28
37
4
11
172
4
27
0
0
12
9
17
6
Mar
o
o
lO9
o
37
3
o
o
6
17
75
19
42
25
114
29
o
lO
o
o
280
o
o
o
o
39
o
40
57
78
63
53
35
12
2
146
4
18
2
o
14
13
27
15
Apr
o
o
230
o
12
3
o
o
5
18
88
27
27
23
235
35
o
8
o
o
296
o
o
o
o
90
o
27
86
lO4
71
19o
33
11
27
118
19
o
o
o
13
12
35
22
May
0
0
224
0
13
4
0
0
33
18
95
29
26
20
240
28
0
7
0
0
228
0
0
0
0
94
0
27
110
96
57
203
87
15
0
128
63
0
1
0
36
15
26
Jun
o
o
272
o
8
5
o
o
3o
44
136
315
28
22
351
30
o
9
o
o
3o2
o
o
o
o
199
o
657
112
116
75
88
78
15
7
132
158
o
3
o
24
25
5o
Jul
0
0
231
0
4
3
2
0
36
18
233
516
25
23
540
28
0
8
0
0
249
0
0
0
0
166
0
36
112
105
59
86
6O
7
3
108
143
0
0
0
3O
15
18
'46
Aug
0
0
141
0
5
3
3
0
15
29
218
721
23
29
391
26
0
7
0
0
198
0
0
0
0
182
0
89
97
55
71
49
4
18
112
101
0
1
0
27
13
19
35
Sep
0
0
154
0
5
4
8
0
23
264
307
19
24
172
25
0
8
0
0
222
0
0
0
0
120
0
0
168
92
60
66
47
1
11
117
139
0
0
0
31
15
23
3O
Oct
0
0
49
0
6
4
1
0
19
23
154
270
19
22
146
26
0
7
0
0
201
0
0
0
0
180
0
0
24
0
38
4
36
1
1
129
39
0
15
0
28
12
28
24
Nov
o
o
37
o
4
3
o
o
26
27
111
239
18
23
76
25
o
9
o
o
lOl
o
o
o
o
6
o
o
o
o
20
17
31
o
1
lO8
12
1
24
24
13
25
19
Dec
o
o
o
o
5
4
o
o
30
24
87
69
18
20
1
24
o
8
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
31
o
21
53
26
1
o
lO9
o
30
1
o
8
7
5
Total
0
0
1595
0
162
47
14
0
299
275
1600
2560
295
276
2559
335
0
161
0
0
2695
0
0
0
0
1162
0
954
825
809
677
894
556
93
1539
681
115
26
24
289
159
324
282
Meter Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
67-35-5110 43 42 38 40 40 53 35 38 35 33 36 27 460
67-35-5120 5 7 5 6 6 9 8 7 8 7 7 6 81
67-35-5130 24 21 16 17 18 26 22 18 24 18 14 12 230
67-35-5140 5 7 5 8 7 10 7 6 6 4 5 2 72
67-35-5143 I I I 3 80 33 44 40 39 29 19 0 290
67-35-5145 29 31 30 32 35 42 40 36 46 38 35 30 424
67-35-5150 21 19 2 0 3 3 3 2 I 3 7 3 67
67-35-5160 2 I 51 2 16 4 3 3 3 2 3 2 92
67-35-5170 157 27 2 108 195 324 192 153 161 127 88 3 1537
67-35-5180 11 9 17 13 18 23 19 26 26 23 28 27 240
67-35-5190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5220 31 17 14 15 18 23 119 113 105 32 34 26 547
67-35-5230 29 37 35 36 44 52 40 38 45 43 115 36 550
67-35-5240 49 60 56 45 66 84 60 43 65 41 32 31 632
67-35-5250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5260 28 31 28 50 40 60 29 34 43 81 59 39 522
67-35-5270 33 37 39 38 43 48 46 70 64 77 50 25 570
67-35-5280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5290 0 0 I 601 771 338 348 621 602 536 219 4 4041
67-35-5460 127 96 108 180 243 321 426 281 270 195 160 144 2551
67-35-5510 386 268 576 1097 1022 1408 1530 1336 1075 645 188 269 9800
67-35-5530 496 476 496 887 1022 2086 1868 2410 1566 1008 673 201 13189
67-35-5550 434 310 366 497 623 949 653 922 929 683 378 313 7057
67-35-5570 437 439 410 468 551 663 646 534 565 395 390 315 5813
67-35-5590 23 22 53 172 380 722 636 381 491 296 85 0 3261
67-35-5610 98 90 87 106 110 139 132 107 131 110 104 73 1287
67-35-5615 76 76 83 137 171 187 197 134 173 145 88 76 1543
67-35-5625 127 102 143 131 270 393 314 217 230 158 147 57 2289
67-35-5710 7 28 7 250 299 433 297 337 593 355 283 5 2894
67-35-5720 99 64 76 79 82 97 91 84 101 92 112 91 1088
67-35-5730 370 331 324 332 370 233 217 15 1226 75 16 15 3524
67-35-5750 238 149 232 152 113 155 136 123 150 81 163 100 1792
67-35-5780 191 93 76 79 94 93 124 98 123 111 91 96 1269
67-35-5855 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5930 32 30 20 8 22 18 2 I 24 100 103 177 537
67-35-5935 622 259 112 31 130 216 363 475 481 245 140 76 3150
67-35-5940 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5950 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
67-35-5955 24 10 35 132 161 193 180 159 169 165 40 0 1268
67-35-5960 30 46 67 149 182 201 214 198 237 109 58 I 1492
67-35-5961 I 43 36 33 32 38 36 37 35 28 25 23 367
67-35-5962 206 379 361 340 398 499 467 511 439 303 257 201 4381
67-35-5963 64 133 230 293 363 521 '534 517 422 371 358 303 4129
Meter Jan Feb Mar Apr
67-35-5964 0 77 117 96
67-35-5970 0 0 0 0
67-35-6030 0 0 0 0
67-35-6055 6 7 10 6
67-35-6080 0 0 0 0
67-35-6082 0 0 0 0
67-35-6105 0 0 0 0
Notes:
1. Source: City of South San Francisco
2. Water Use Metered Data for East of Highway 101
May
192
0
0
8
0
0
0
Jun
199
o
o
9
o
o
o
Jul
193
0
0
7
0
0
0
Aug
2O2
0
0
10
0
0
0
Sep
198
0
0
13
0
0
0
Oct
167
0
0
14
0
0
Nov
49
o
o
9
o
o
o
Dec
8
o
o
6
o
o
o
Total
1498
0
0
105
0
0
0
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX F- SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
SeptemOer 2002
H :\Final\SoS FO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~APP.doc
! I I ] ! I ! I I ! I I I I ! ! I I
Finn Avg Peak
P~14 Capacity Flow F-Iow
(mgd) (mgd) (rngd)
Cun'ent 0.84 0.02 0.06
Futura 1.81 0.43 0.9~
Finn Avg Peak
P,~4 Capacity Flow Flow
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
Current 2.88 1.56 5.33
Future 12,96 5.03 12.89
Firm Avg Peak
P~ Capacity Flow Flow
(mod) (mgd) (mod)
Current 0.29 0.06 0.33
Future 0.29 0.06 0.33
IB-7
Firm Avg Peak 1
PS2 Capaci{y Flow Flow ~, Firm Avg Peak
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd) PS1 Capacity Row Row
Current 1.44 0.20 0.65 ~ {rngd) (mgd) {mgd)
Future 3.46 1.4 3.28 10" laM~ Current 0.86 0.08 0.21
I
Firm Avg Peak
PS7 Capack'y Fk=w Row
(mgd) (mgd) {mgd)
Current 0.~ 0.03 0.31
F~um 1.15 0.~ 1.14
LEGEND
~ Pump Station
I Drainage Basin
J South San Francisco San Bruno
Sewage Treatment Plant
1. Current Average Flow~ we ftx~n 2001 WQCP flow records.
2. Peak Flmes are from Hydraulc Mod~ N~J~s.
21' FM
WQ, CP Avg Flow Peak Flow
Current 1.59 5.53
Future 5.49 14.05
Firm Avg Peak
P~8 Capacity Flow Flow
(rngdl (mgd) (mgd)
Current 1.43 0.58 1.50
Future 2.02 0.81 2.00
Firm Avg Peak
t P$10 Capa(~¥ Flow Flow
(rngd) (mgd) (mgd)
B-5 Current 0.72 0.02 0.06
Future 1.08 0.44 1.07
Firm Avg Peak
PS,3 Capacity Flow Flow
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
Current 2.16 0.17 0.59
Future 2.16 0.61 1.57
SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
City of South San Francisco
East of Highway 101
Sewer System Master Plan
carOLLO
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
APPENDIX G - HYDRAULIC MODEL INPUT DATA
Septerr ber 2002
H:\FinaI\SoSFO_FNO\6399A00\Rpt~APP,doc
City of South Sen Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Model - Input Databe~
ID No. Type Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
1431 =-PI 307.7 9.7 11.0 2.7 1.5 0.0041
1434 ---PI 200.5 11.0 9.5 0.7 0.3 0.0020
1436 =PI 292.4 11.4 11.0 1,4 1,2 0.0006
1437 =PI 274.5 11.5 10,6 3.8 3.3 0.0016
1439 EPI 151.7 10.6 9.7 3.3 2.7 0.0039
1440 -.'Pi 304.7 20,8 18.2 11.5 8.1 0.0112
1441 IEPI 321 .§ 14.0 12.0 6.8 4.4 0.007~;
1442 -'PI 282.2 32.8 29.7 21.1 18.5 0.0091
1445 =PI 333.5 26.7 23.3 16.5 14.1 0.0073
1447 --'PI 313.1 29.7 26.7 18.5 16.5 0.0064
1448 =PI 152.0 19.4 17.9 14.2 12.6 0.0101
1450 I-'PI 73.8 19.7 19.4 14.9 14.2 0.0107
1452 I-'PI 213.4 35.5 32.8 26.2 21.1 0.0241
1509 I-'PI 317.2 16.1 18,0 5.5 2.4 0.0098
1511 I-'PI 126.0 15.3 16.1 10.2 5.7 0.0364
1515 EPI 400.8 54.0 49.1 46.8 44.2 0.0065
1518 I-'PI 312.9 21,8 19.3 15.4 13.7 0.0057
1521 EPI 364.3 19.3 16.5 13,7 11.9 0.0048
1522 EPI 239.2 49.1 21.8 44.2 15.4 0.1203
1523 EPI 303.3 55.5 54.5 49.5 47.7 0,0061
1526 EPI 238.8 54.5 54.0 47.7 46.8 0.0035
1527 EPI 185.7 55.2 55,5 51.4 49.5 0.0103
1528 EPI 236.8 12.0 10.7 4.4 3.2 0.0053
1531 EPI 246.2 10.7 14.2 3.2 2.2 0.0040
1533 EPI 74.8 14.2 11.5 2.2 -1.7 0.0524
1534 EPI 132.4 10.9 12.0 5.1 4.4 0.0048
1547 EPI 306.7 14.4 9.5 9.1 3.4 0.01 64
1549 EPI 335.3 21.7 14.4 16.4 9.1 0.0217
1551 EPI 311.6 28.7 21.7 23.4 16.4 0.0226
1553 EPI 223.1 36.7 28.7 28.2 23.4 0.0216
1555 EPI 245.4 34.5 36.7 29.1 28.2 0.0037
1557 EPI 219.0 45.6 34,5 40.2 29.1 0.0507
1559 EPI 314.0 50.5 45.6 45.2 40.2 0,0157
1561 EPI 262.0 59.3 50.5 54.0 45.2 0.0337
1593 EPI 242.9 54.2 54.0 47.6 46.8 0.0032
1595 EPI 375.8 56.0 54.2 49.9 47.6 0.0061
1597 EPI 352.5 60.0 56.0 54.4 49.9 0.0128
1599 EPI 334.7 9.7 11.0 1.8 -2.3 0,0121
1602 EPI 199.1 17.8 9.5 -0.9 -1.9 0.0049
1605 EPI 341.7 9.9 17.8 0.8 -0.9 0.0049
1607 EPI 263.9 9.4 9.9 2.1 0.8 0.0049
1609 EPI 278.6 9.9 9.4 3.7 2.2 0.0051
1611 EPI 273.7 10.4 9.9 5.1 3.7 0.0051
1613 EPI 280.9 9.9 10.4 6.1 5.1 0.0037
1615 EPI 170.5 11.1 10.4 5.8 5.1 0.0042
1617 EPI 287.2 11.7 11.1 7.3 5.8 0.0053
1619 EPI 298.6 12.7 11.7 8.7 7.3 0.0047
1621 EPI 233.5 10.7 9.7 3.5 1.8 0.0073
1623 EPI 205.7 10.7 10.7 5.7 3.5 0.0107
1625 EPI 1 98.3 11.2 11.6 7.7 6.8 0.0048
1628 EPi 376.6 11.6 10.2 6.8 1.8 0.0132
1630 I=PI 31.0 10.2 10.1 1.8 1.4 0.0132
1640 I:PI 132.9 10.2 10.1 3.2 1.4 0.0137
1642 -'PI 180.3 10.1 10.6 1.4 0.6 0.0042
1644 --PI 223.0 10.6 9.3 0.6 -2.2 0.0125
1646 -'PI 251.8 9.3 8.9 -2.2 -4.9 0.0108
1648 -'PI 45.8 8.9 9.6 -4.9 -5.4 0.0103
1650 ---PI 187.3 9.4 9.3 3.3 -2.2 0.0291
1652 =PI 228.2 12.3 9.4 4.5 3.3 0.0054
1654 --'PI 284.8 10.1 9.3 2.5 -2,2 0.01 64
1656 --Pi 260.5 10.5 10.1 3.1 2.5 0.0025
1658 =PI 313.5 10.1 10.5 5.6 3.1 0.0078
1660 --PI 100.4 10.0 10.1 7.0 5.6 0.0140
1662 --PI 92.6 10.0 10.1 7.0 5.6 0.0151
1733 =PI 201.4 78.0 66.2 69.7 60.3 0.0466
1736 =PI 231.0 94.2 78.0 85.4 69.7 0.0678
1738 --PI 164.1 96.9 94.2 90.0 86.8 0.0199
Note
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Ma,o
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
ID No.
1740
1742
1744
1746
1748
1750
1752
1754
1757
1759
1760
1762
1764
1767
1769
1771
1773
1775
1777
1779
1781
1785
1787
1789
1792
1794
1796
1798
1800
1802
1804
1806
1809
1811
1813
1815
1817
1819
1822
1824
1826
1828
1832
1834
1836
1838
1841
1842
1844
1846
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1865
1867
1869
1871
1873
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
City of South San Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Model - Input Databa~
"ype Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
EPI 334.6 98.5 98.9 94.5 90.0 0.0133
EPI 319.7 73.8 66.2 66.5 60.3 0.0192
EPI 282.1 75.3 73.8 68.7 66,5 0.0078
EPI 87.8 66.2 64.5 60.3 59.8 0.0058
EPI 236.8 64.5 40.7 58.6 33.7 0.1053
EPI 207.1 40.7 20.9 33.7 12.8 0.1007
EPI 96.8 43.2 40.7 35.2 33.7 0.0158
EPI 475.0 79.0 83.3 75.0 73,7 0.0028
EPI 150.0 83.3 80.3 73.7 67.9 0.0389
EPI 128.4 80.3 43.3 67.9 35.2 0.2544
EPI 136.7 20.9 17.8 12.8 11.3 0.0112
EPI 81.6 17.7 16.8 11.3 9.8 0.0185
EPI 300.0 11.7 8.3 4.3 -0.2 0.0147
EPI 306.7 8.3 8.4 -0.2 -2.9 0.0089
EPt 254.2 8.4 7.6 -2.9 -5.0 0,0084
EPI 91.4 7.4 7.6 -4.1 -5.0 0.0097
EPI 283.4 10.8 7.4 1.4 -3.3 0.0166
EPI 234.9 12.4 10.8 4,5 1.4 0.0132
EPI 250.0 8.6 7.4 -1.8 -4.1 0.0095
EPI 310.0 8.7 8.6 1.3 -1.8 0.0100
EPI 300.0 11.7 11.1 7.6 3.8 0.0127
EPI 204.7 11.7 11.5 7.6 5.6 0.0099
EPI 325.0 11.5 16.1 5.6 4.7 0.0028
EPI 115.0 18.8 17.3 15.2 13.3 0.01 54
EPI 308.0 27.4 18.8 16.7 15.2 0.0049
EPI 280.0 31.2 27.4 17.8 16.7 0.0039
EPI 261.6 36.0 31.2 19.8 17.8 0.0076
EPI 360.0 38.6 36.0 30.6 19.8 0,0299
EPI 235.0 39.9 38.6 33.0 30.6 0.0103
EPI 280.0 42.1 39.9 34.4 33.0 0.0051
EPI 355.0 41.9 42.0 37.1 34,4 0,0076
EPI 330.0 36.3 37.6 32.3 30.9 0.0041
EPI 350.0 37.6 39.1 30.9 29.9 0.0030
EPI 300.0 39.1 41.9 29.9 29.8 0.0002
EPI 300.0 41.9 34.1 29.8 26.9 0.0097
EPI 280.0 34.1 26.4 26.9 22.6 0.0154
EPI 268.4 26.4 20.9 22.6 15.7 0.0257
EPI 85.0 38.0 37.7 32.2 32.1 0.0016
EPI 240.0 37.7 36.0 32.1 31.9 0.0010
EPI 222.2 36,0 34.6 31,9 30.5 0.0062
EPI 250.0 41.3 37.7 38.1 32.1 0.0269
EPI 170.0 42.6 41,3 38.8 38.1 -0.0041
EPI 310.0 65.7 62.8 60.4 57.5 0.0092
EPI 70.0 66.9 65.7 60.7 60.4 0.0044
EPI 375.0 65.6 66.9 62.1 60.7 0.0039
EPI 160.0 63.2 63.5 59.0 57.5 0.0094
EPI 270.6 63.5 60.0 57.5 54.4 0.0114
EPI 270.0 36.4 36.0 29.3 19.8 0.0352
EPI 192.8 37.3 36.4 30.1 29.3 0.0043
EPI 86.9 37.9 37.3 30.8 30.1 0.0078
EPI 315.0 64.4 37.9 58.4 30.8 0.0876
EPI 274.4 88.0 64.4 82.0 58.4 0.0860
EPI 250.0 98.6 88.0 91.9 82.0 0.0397
EPI 256.3 98.8 98.6 93.2 91.9 0.0051
EPI 250.0 101.2 98.8 94.6 93.2 0.0055
EPI 218.0 102.2 101.2 95.5 94.6 0.0043
EPI 289.1 101.5 102.2 97.0 95.5 0.0051
EPI 200.0 17.7 17.1 13.0 12.1 0.0046
EPI 415.0 17.1 15.9 12.1 10.2 0.0046
EPI 180.0 15.9 15.4 10.2 9.4 0.0046
EPI 38.5 15.4 15.3 9.4 9.2 0.0047
EPI 200.0 16.5 15.8 8.4 7.6 0.0042
EPI 350.0 15.8 14.6 7.6 6.2 0.0041
EPI 350.0 14.6 13.3 6.2 4.7 0.0041
EPI 65.0 13.3 13.2 4.7 4.4 0.0046
EPI 260.0 13.2 12.9 4.4 3.2 0.0045
EPI 250.0 12.9 12.7 3.2 2.1 0.0046
Note
Aras Map
Aras Map
AUas Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias MaD
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas MaD
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
City of South San Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Model - Input Databam
ID No. Type Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
1886 EPI 250.0 12.7 12.4 2.1 0.9 0.0046
1888 EPI 260.0 12.4 12.1 0.9 -0,3 0.0046
1890 EPI 101.5 12.1 12.0 -0.3 -0.7 0.0046
1892 EPI 483.2 13.5 12.0 9.5 -0.1 0.0200
1894 EPI 150.1 12.0 11.8 -0.7 -1.4 0.0045
1896 EPI 345.0 9.0 12.1 1.6 -0.3 0.0054
1899 EPI 469.0 9.3 9.0 3.4 1.6 0.0038
1901 EPI 426.1 15.5 13.3 8.0 5.3 0.0064
1903 EPI 285,1 10.3 9.3 4.7 3.4 0.0047
1905 EPI 314.9 10.4 9.3 4.8 3.4 0.0045
1907 EPI 26.0 10.0 10.4 5.1 4.8 0.0131
1909 EPI 374.8 8.8 10,0 6.4 5.1 0.0034
1911 EPI 27.2 11.1 19.4 -9.7 -10.7 0.0368
1913 EPI 28.1 11.0 11.1 -2.3 -9.7 0.2668
1922 EPI 177.2 20.9 17.0 15.7 4.0 0.0662
1924 EPI 44.2 15.8 17.0 7.1 4.0 0.0703
1926 EPI 355.6 24.4 15.8 13.3 7.1 0.0174
1928 EPI 52.2 83.6 24,4 73.6 13.8 1.1468
1934 EPI 37.1 7.6 9.1 -5.0 -6.2 0.0324
1935 EPI 37.2 17.0 17.0 4.0 3.0 0.0269
1936 EPI 164.3 16,1 15.4 4.7 2.0 0.0162
1937 EPI 39.4 12.1 6.0 -0.3 -3.0 0.0685
1939 EPI 58.8 11.8 6.0 -1.4 -3.0 0.0272
1940 EPI 250.0 17.3 15.5 13.3 10.4 0.0118
1942 EPI 239.6 15.5 15.3 10.4 8.7 0.0068
1944 EPI 114.1 13.7 15.1 8.7 8.9 -0.0012
1 946 EPI 290.0 17.0 15.5 9.8 8.0 0.0062
1948 EPI 300.0 18.5 17.0 11.7 9.8 0,0062
1950 EPI 290.2 20.0 18.5 13.5 11,7 0,0062
1954 EPI 32.7 9.6 9.6 -5.4 -5.7 0,0116
1957 EPI 311.5 34.6 34.5 30.5 29.1 0.0044
1 950 EPI 235.0 13.5 11.7 7.3 4.3 0.0128
1962 EPI 227.2 16.8 13.5 9,8 7,3 0.0110
1963 EPI 253.5 15.3 16.5 9,2 9.0 0.0007
1968 EPI 139.6 15.3 15.1 8.7 8.9 -0.0009
1978 EPI 65.3 6.9 8.6 -6,0 -6.0 0.0002
1995 EPI 29.1 15.8 14.8 12.3 11.3 0.0344
2005 EPI 61.6 9.5 11.0 3.4 2.3 0.0185
2006 EPI 490.8 62.8 59.3 57.5 54.0 0.0071
2007 EPI 51.2 11.5 11.4 1.4 1.4 0.0008
2011 EPI 83.1 9.6 7.9 -1.0 ~4.9 0.0468
2024 EPI 193.9 22.0 18.0 3.5 2.5 0.0048
2026 EPI 241.0 26.9 22.0 4.6 3.6 0.0042
2028 EPI 299.5 20.5 26.9 7.3 4.6 0.0087
2030 EPI 300.4 14.1 20.5 9.9 7.4 0.0082
2116 EPI 130.1 11.1 8.7 3.8 1.3 0.0189
' 2118 EPI 69.6 9.5 11.0 -1.9 -2.3 0.0049
2119 EPI 414.3 11.5 11.5 -0.4 -1.4 0.0024
547 IV AN 0.0 9.0 9.0 -0,2 -0.2 0.0000
548 IV AN 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.3 0.3 0.0000
550 IV AN 0.0 14.0 14.0 7.1 6.8 0.0000
551 IV AN 0.0 15.2 15.2 8.1 8.1 0.0000
568 IV AN 0.0 15.1 15.1 8.9 8.9 0.0000
569 IV AN 0.0 14.9 14.9 9.1 9.1 0.0000
1019 IV AN 0.0 10.6 10.6 0.9 0.9 0.0000
1020 IV AN 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.1 0.1 0.0000
1050 IV AN 0.0 7.6 7.6 2.2 2.2 0.0000
1051 IV AN 0.0 10.9 10.9 2.1 2.1 0.0000
1053 IVlAN 0.0 10.3 10.3 0.0 6.1 0.0000
1054 IvlAN 0.0 9.9 9.9 4.9 4.9 0.0000
1057 IvlAN 0.0 10.9 10.9 3.9 3.9 0.0000
1058 IvlAN 0.0 10.3 10.3 1.8 1,8 0.0000
1062 blAN 0.0 10.9 10.9 5.3 5.3 0.0000
1064 blAN 0.0 10.7 10.7 0.0 5.4 0.0000
1066 blAN 0.0 11.0 11.0 -0.6 -0.6 0.0000
1069 blAN 0.0 9.4 9.4 3.2 3.2 0.0000
1070 IVlAN 0.0 11.8 11.8 2.9 2.9 0.0000
Note
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH36
Calculated
SURVEY MH10
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
SURVEY MH34
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH4
Atlas Map
City of Seuth San Francl~ East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Medel - Input Databa~
ID No. Type Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
1072 MAN 0.0 12.1 12.1 0.0 8.2 0.0000
1075 MAN 0.0 10.8 10.8 5.3 5.3 0,0000
1076 MAN 0.0 10.0 10.0 4.4 4.4 0.0000
1078 MAN 0.0 9.2 9.2 -3.6 -3.6 0.0000
1079 MAN 0.0 7.5 7.5 -1.9 -2.2 0.0000
1081 MAN 0,0 8.4 8.4 2.4 2.4 0.0000
1082 MAN 0.0 7,6 7.6 1.5 1.5 0.0000
1084 MAN 0.0 9.0 9.0 1.5 1.5 0.0000
1085 MAN 0.0 8.2 8.2 -3.6 -5,0 0,0000
1087 MAN 0.0 6.9 6.9 -4.9 -6.0 0.0000
1088 MAN 0,0 8.0 8.0 -5.5 -5.5 0.0000
1090 MAN 0.0 9.6 9.6 -1.0 -1.0 0.0000
1097 MAN 0.0 9.8 9.8 4.1 4.1 0.0000
1098 MAN 0.0 8.9 8.9 3.1 3.1 0.0000
1102 MAN 0.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 3.8 0.0000
1103 MAN 0.0 9.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.0000
1106 MAN 0.0 9.5 9.5 -1.6 -1.6 0.0000
1109 MAN 0.0 12.3 12.3 0.0 7.1 0.0000
1110 MAN 0.0 11.6 11.6 6.2 6.2 0.0000
1113 MAN 0.0 15.7 15.7 8.6 8.6 0.0000
1116 MAN 0.0 20.8 20.8 16.2 16.2 0.0000
1117 MAN 0.0 21.3 21.3 0.0 17.5 0.0000
1119 MAN 0.0 19.2 19.2 12.4 12.4 0.0000
1120 MAN 0.0 18.7 18.7 12.5 12.5 0.0000
1122 MAN 0.0 17,1 17.1 11.3 11.3 0,0000
1124 MAN 0.0 14.2 14.2 10.6 10.6 0.0000
1127 &lAN 0.0 20.0 20,0 14.7 14,7 0.0000
1130 MAN 0.0 16,5 16.5 11.9 11.9 0.0000
1131 MAN 0.0 15.3 15.3 10.4 10.2 0.0000
1293 MAN 0.0 18.0 18.0 2.5 2.4 0.0000
1307 MAN 0.0 17.0 17.0 6.4 6.4 0.0000
1308 MAN 0.0 18.2 18.2 8.1 8.1 0.0000
1310 MAN 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 1.5 0.0000
1311 MAN 0.0 11.4 11.4 1.4 1.4 0.0000
1313 MAN 0.0 11.9 11.9 2.1 1.6 0.0000
1314 MAN 0.0 11.5 11.5 1,4 1.4 0.0000
1316 MAN 0.0 17.9 17.9 12.6 12.6 0.0000
1317 MAN 0.0 16.8 16.8 11.6 11,6 0.0000
1322 blAN 0.0 13.6 13.6 7.8 7.8 0.0000
1323 blAN 0.0 14.0 14.0 6.0 6.0 0.0000
1328 blAN 0.0 15.0 15.0 3.7 3.7 0.0000
1329 blAN 0.0 14.6 14.6 3.4 3.4 0.0000
1331 MAN 0.0 16.1 16.1 4.3 4.3 0.0000
1332 bIAN 0.0 15.1 15.1 3.8 3.8 0.0000
1379 MAN 0.0 11.1 11.1 2.2 2.2 0.0000
1380 MAN 0.0 13.8 13.8 3.3 3,3 0.0000
1382 MAN 0.0 14.0 14.0 2.9 2.9 0.0000
1383 MAN 0.0 13.5 13.5 2.5 2.5 0.0000
1405 MAN 0.0 12.8 12.8 8.8 8.8 0.0000
1407 MAN 0.0 12.0 12.0 9.9 9.9 0.0000
1409 MAN 0.0 15.5 15.5 10.8 10.8 0.0000
1423 MAN 0.0 20.8 20.8 11.5 11.5 0.0000
1424 MAN 0.0 23.3 23.3 14.1 14.1 0.0000
1426 MAN 0.0 11.5 11.5 3.8 3.8 0.0000
1427 MAN 0.0 12.0 12.0 4.4 4.4 0.0000
1429 MAN 0.0 11.5 11.5 0.0 7.9 0.0000
1430 MAN 0.0 9.5 9.5 3.4 3.4 0.0000
1432 MAN 0.0 11.0 11.0 2.3 0.7 0.0000
1433 MAN 0.0 9.7 9.7 2.7 2.7 0.0000
1438 MAN 0.0 10.6 10.6 3.3 3.3 0.0000
1443 MAN 0.0 29.7 29.7 18.5 18.5 0.0000
1444 MAN 0.0 32.8 32.8 21.1 21.1 0.0000
1446 MAN 0.0 26.7 26.7 16.5 16.5 0.0000
1449 MAN 0.0 19.4 19.4 14.2 14.2 0.0000
1451 MAN 0.0 19.7 19.7 0.0 14.9 0.0000
1453 MAN 0.0 35.5 35.5 26.2 26.2 0.0000
1510 MAN 0.0 16.1 16.1 5.7 5.5 0.0000
Note
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
Arias Map
Arias Map
Calculated
SURVEY MH6
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH33
SURVEY MH5
Calculated
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Arias Map
Calculated
Calculated
Arias Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH12
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
SURVEY MH27
SURVEY MH37
Arias Map
Arias Map
Calculated
SURVEY MH35
Calculated
Arias Map
Atlas MaD
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH39
Calculated
Atlas MaD
Calculated
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Arias Map
Calculated
SURVEY MH32
Atlas Map
Atlas MaD
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH38
Atlas Map
ID No.
1514
1516
1517
1519
1520
1524
1525
1529
1530
1532
1535
1548
1550
1552
1554
1556
1558
1560
1562
1594
1596
1598
1600
1601
1603
1604
1606
1608
1610
1612
1614
1616
1618
1620
1622
1624
1626
1627
1629
1631
1641
1643
1645
1647
1649
1651
1653
1655
1657
1659
1661
1663
1734
1735
1737
1739
1741
1743
1745
1747
1749
1751
1753
1755
1756
1758
1761
City of ~uth San Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Ivl~del - Input Databa~
Type Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
MAN 0.0 55.2 55.2 51.4 51.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 54.0 54.0 46.8 46.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 49.1 49.1 44.2 44.2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 21.8 21.8 15.4 15.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 19.3 19.3 13.7 13.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 55.5 55.5 49.5 49.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 54.5 54.5 47.7 47.7 0.0000
klAN 0.0 12.0 12.0 4.4 4,4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.7 10.7 3.2 3.2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 14.2 14.2 2.2 2.2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 5.1 0.0000
MAN 0.0 14.4 14.4 9.1 9.1 0,0000
IVlAN 0.0 21.7 21.7 16.4 16.4 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 28.7 28.7 23.4 23.4 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 36.7 36,7 28.2 28.2 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 34.5 34.5 29.1 29.1 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 45.6 45.6 40.2 40.2 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 50.5 50.5 45.2 45.2 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 59.3 59.3 54.0 54.0 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 54.2 54.2 47.6 47.6 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 56.0 56.0 49.9 49.9 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 60.0 60.0 54.4 54.4 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.7 9.7 1.8 1.8 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 11.0 11.0 -2.3 -2.3 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.5 9.5 -1.9 -1.9 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 17.8 17.8 -0.9 -0.9 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.9 9.9 0.8 0.8 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.4 9.4 2.2 2.1 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.9 9.9 3.7 3.7 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 10.4 10.4 5.1 5.1 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 9.9 9.9 0.0 6.1 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 11.1 11.1 5.8 5.8 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 11.7 11.7 7.3 7.3 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 12.7 12.7 0.0 8.7 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 10.7 10.7 3.5 3.5 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 10.7 10.7 0.0 5.7 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 11.2 11.2 0,0 7.7 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 11.6 11.6 6.8 6.8 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 10.2 10.2 1.8 1.8 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 10.1 10.1 1.4 1.4 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 10.2 10.2 0.0 3.2 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 10.6 10.6 0.6 0.6 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 9.3 9.3 -2.2 -2.2 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 8.9 8.9 -4.9 -4.9 0.0000
IVAN 0.0 9.6 9.6 -5.4 -5.4 0.0000
IV AN 0.0 9.4 9.4 3.3 3.3 0.0000
MAN 0.0 12.3 12.3 0.0 4.5 0.0000
M AN 0.0 10.1 10.1 2.5 2.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.5 10.5 3.1 3.1 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.1 10,1 5.6 5.6 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 7.0 0.0000
MAN 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 7.0 0.0000
MAN 0.0 66.2 66.2 60.3 60.3 0.0000
MAN 0.0 78.0 78.0 69.7 69.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 94.2 94.2 86.8 85.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 98.9 98.9 90.0 90.0 0.0000
MAN 0.0 98.5 98.5 0.0 94.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 73.8 73.8 66.5 66.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 75.3 75.3 0.0 68.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 64.5 64.5 59.8 58.6 0.0000
MAN 0.0 40.7 40.7 33.7 33.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 20.9 20.9 12.8 12.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 43.2 43.2 35.2 35,2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 79.0 79.0 0.0 75.0 0.0000
MAN 0.0 83.3 83.3 73.7 73.7 0,0000
MAN 0.0 80.3 80.3 67.9 67.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 17.7 17.7 11.3 11,3 0.0000
Note
SURVEY MH29
SURVEY MH28
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH30
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH2000
Atlas Map
Aras Map
Aras Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Aras Map
SURVEY MH7
SURVEY MH7C
Atlas Map
Aras Map
SURVEY MH8
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Calculated
SURVEY MH1
Atlas Map
Calculated
SURVEY MH2
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH3
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH26
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
ID No.
1763
1765
1766
1768
1770
1772
1774
1776
1778
1780
1782
1786
1788
1790
1791
1793
1795
1797
1799
1801
1803
1805
1807
1808
1810
1812
1814
1816
1818
1820
1821
1823
1825
1827
1829
1831
1833
1835
1837
1839
1840
1843
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1875
1877
1879
1881
1883
1885
1887
1889
1891
1893
City of South San Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Model - Input Detabas~
· rvpe Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
MAN 0.0 16.8 16.8 9.8 9.8 0.0OO0
MAN 0.0 11.7 11.7 4.3 4.3 0.0000
MAN 0.0 8.3 8,3 -0.2 -0.2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 8.4 8.4 -2.9 -2.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 7.6 7.6 -5.0 -5.0 0.0000
M AN 0.0 7.4 7.4 -3.3 -4.1 0.0000
M~,N 0.0 10.8 10.8 1.4 1.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.0 4.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 8.6 8.6 -1.8 -1.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 8.7 8.7 1.3 1.3 0.0000
MAN 0.0 11,7 11.7 3.8 7.6 0~0000
MAN 0.0 11,5 11.5 5.6 5.6 0,0000
MAN 0.0 16,1 16.1 4.7 4.7 0,0000
MAN 0.0 17.3 17.3 13.3 13.3 0,0000
MAN 0.0 18,8 18.8 15.2 15.2 0,0000
MAN 0.0 27.4 27.4 16.7 16.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 31.2 31.2 17.8 17.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 36.0 36.0 19.8 19.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 38.6 38.6 30.6 30.6 0.0000
MAN 0.0 39.9 39.9 33.0 33.0 0.0000
MAN 0.0 42.1 42.1 34.4 34.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 41.9 41.9 37.1 37.1 0.0000
MAN 0.0 36.3 36.3 0.0 32.3 0.0000
MAN 0.0 37.6 37.6 30.9 30.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 39.1 39.1 29.9 29.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 41.9 41.9 29.8 29.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 34.1 34.1 26.9 26.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 26.4 26.4 22.6 22.6 0.0000
MAN 0.0 20.9 20.9 15.7 15.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 32.2 0.0000
MAN 0.0 37,7 37.7 32.1 32.1 0.0000
MAN 0.0 36.0 36.0 31.9 31.9 0.0000
MAN 0.0 34.6 34.6 30.5 30.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 41.3 41,3 38.1 38.1 0,0000
MAN 0.0 42.6 42.6 0.0 38.8 0.0000
MAN 0.0 62.8 62,8 57.5 57.5 0.0000
MAN 0.0 65.7 65.7 60.4 60.4 0.0000
MAN 0.0 66.9 66.9 60.7 60.7 0.0000
MAN 0.0 65.6 65.6 0.0 62.1 0.0000
MAN 0.0 63.2 63.2 0.0 59,0 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 63.5 63.5 57.5 57.5 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 36.4 36.4 29.3 29.3 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 37.3 37.3 30.1 30.1 0.0000
MA~q 0.0 37.9 37.9 30.8 30.8 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 64.4 64.4 58.4 58.4 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 88.0 88.0 82.0 82.0 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 98.6 98.6 91,9 91.9 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 98.8 98.8 93.2 93,2 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 101.2 101.2 94.6 94.6 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 102.2 102.2 95,5 95.5 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 101.5 101.5 0.0 97.0 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 17.7 17.7 0.0 13.0 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 17.1 17.1 12,1 12.1 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 15,9 15.9 10,2 10.2 0.0000
MA ~l 0.0 15.4 15.4 9.4 9.4 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 15.3 15,3 9.2 9.2 0.0000
MA~I 0,0 16.5 16.5 9.0 8.4 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 15.8 15.8 7.6 7.6 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 14.6 14.6 6.2 6.2 0.0000
MA ~1 0,0 13.3 13.3 5.3 4,7 0.0000
MA~ 0.0 13.2 13.2 4.4 4.4 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 12.9 12.9 3,2 3.2 0.0000
MA~I 0.0 12.7 12.7 2.1 2.1 0.0000
MAq 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.9 0.9 0.0000
MA q 0.0 12.1 12.1 -0.3 -0.3 0,0000
MAN 0,0 12.0 12.0 -0.1 -0.7 0,0000
MAN 0.0 13.5 13.5 0,0 9.5 0.0000
Note
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH25
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH24
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas MaD
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH23
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH22
SURVEY MH11
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH17
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH18
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH19
Atlas Map
Atlas MaD
SURVEY MH20
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
SURVEY MH13A
SURVEY MH13B
Calculated
Calculated
SURVEY MH14
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Atlas Map
n ~
City of South San Francisco East of Highway 101 Hydraulic Modal - Input Databa.~
ID No. Type Length Ground Up Ground Dn Invert Up Invert Dn Slope
1895 MAN 0.0 11.8 11.8 -1.4 -1.4 0.0000
1897 MAN 0.0 12.1 12.1 -0.3 -0.3 0.0000
1898 MAN 0.0 9.0 9.0 1.6 1.6 0.0000
1900 MAN 0.0 9.3 9.3 3.4 3.4 0.0000
1902 MAN 0.0 15.5 15.5 8.0 8.0 0.0000
1904 MAN 0.0 10.3 10.3 0.0 4.7 0.0000
1906 MAN 0.0 10.4 10.4 4.8 4.8 0.0000
1908 MAN 0.0 10.0 10.0 5.1 5.1 0.0000
1910 MAN 0.0 8.8 8.8 0.0 6.4 0.0000
1923 IVlAN 0.0 17.0 17.0 4.0 4.0 0.0000
1925 IVlAN 0.0 15.8 15.8 7.1 7.1 0.0000
1927 IV AN 0.0 24.4 24.4 13.8 13.3 0.0000
1929 tV AN 0.0 83.6 83.6 0.0 73.6 0.0000
1941 IV AN 0.0 15.5 15.5 10.4 10.4 0.0000
1 943 V AN 0.0 15.3 15.3 8.7 8.7 0.0000
1 945 IV AN 0.0 13.7 13.7 0.0 8.7 0.0000
1 947 V AN 0.0 17.0 17.0 9.8 9.8 0.0000
1949 VAN 0.0 18.5 18.5 11.7 11.7 0.0000
1951 IV AN 0.0 20.0 20.0 13.5 13.5 0.0000
1961 IV AN 0.0 13.5 13.5 7.3 7.3 0.0000
1993 VAN 0.0 15.8 15.8 12.3 12.3 0.0000
2025 VAN 0.0 22.0 22.0 3.6 3.5 0.0000
2027 MAN 0.0 26.9 26.9 4.6 4.6 0.0000
2029 MAN 0.0 20.5 20.5 7.4 7.3 0.0000
2031 MAN 0.0 14.1 14.1 0.0 9.9 0.0000
2111 MAN 0.0 11.7 11.7 0.0 7.6 0.0000
2115 MAN 0.0 11.1 11.1 3.8 3.8 0.0000
2117 MAN 0.0 11.1 11.1 -9.7 -9.7 0.0000
2120 MAN 0.0 11.5 11.5 0.0 -0.4 0.0000
1996 O Jr' 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000
1454 P :~E 834.9 18.0 35.5 1.5 26.2 -0.0295
1512 P ;{E 898.6 11.5 55.2 6.3 51.4 -0.0503
1914 P :lE 2813.5 8.5 15.8 1.8 12.3 -0.0038
1920 PRE 966.1 17.0 41.9 3.0 37.1 -0.0353
1956 PRE 595.1 9.6 9.4 -5.7 3.2 -0.0150
1964 PRE 199.1 6.0 19.2 4.5 12.4 -0.0397
1990 PRE 734.3 19.2 15.8 8.7 12.3 -0.0049
2113 PRE 2746.4 9.1 41.9 1.0 37.1 -0.0131
2122 PRE 860.4 11.5 15.3 7.8 10.4 -0.0030
1093 PUM 0.0 8.5 8.5 -6.0 -6.0 0.0000
1294 PUM 0.0 121.0 121.0 1.5 '1.5 0.0000
1912 PUM 0.0 19.4 19.4 -10.7 -10.7 0.0000
1921 PUM 0.0 15.4 15.4 2.0 2.0 0.0000
19,33 PUM 0.0 9.1 9.1 -6.2 -6.2 0.0000
1938 PUM 0.0 7.8 7.8 -3.0 -3.0 0.0000
1955 PUM 0.0 9.5 9.5 -5.7 -5.7 0.0000
2107 PUM 306.7 11.5 11.5 -1.7 -1.7 0.0000
2121 PUM 0.0 11.5 11.5 ol .4 -1.4 0.0000
Note
SURVEY MH15
SURVEY MH16
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Calculated
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH21
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH9
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Calculated
Calculated
SURVEY MH28B
Calculated
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH23
Atlas Map
SURVEY MH7A
Calculated
WQCP
AUas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
Atlas Map
PS4
PS2
PS7
PS10
PS8
PS3
PS6
PS1
PS14