HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 3967-1964RESOLUTION NO. 3967
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN ~FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT A MAJOR-
ITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN THE
WESTBOROUGH INHABITED AREA ANNEXATION
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that
WHEREAS, on the ~th day of May , 1964 ,
said Council in its Resolution No.3928 entitled "A Reso-
lution of Intention to Call a Special Election to Annex to
the City of South San Francisco the Territory Designated
as Westborough Inhabited Area and Fixing the Time and Place
for Protest" declared its intention to call a special
election and fixed the time and place for protest in accord-
ance with the Government Code of the State of California;
said time and place being U o'clock p.m., Monday, June 8
, 19 6k, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Grand
and Maple Avenues, South San Francisco, California, and,
WHEREAS, notice was duly given as required by law in
that said Resolution was published pursuant to Section 6066
of the Government Code in the Burlingame Advance-Star and
the Enterprise-Journal, newspapers of general circulation,
the first published in the County of San Mateo of which
the territory proposed to be annexed is a part, and the
second published in the City of South San Francisco; and
further said Resolution was posted not less than ten days
before said hearing in three public places within the terri-
tory proposed to be annexed, all as shown by affidavits on
file in the office of the City Clerk, and,
WHEREAS, said matter came on regularly for hearing
at the time fixed in said Resolution, and was continued
to the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held
on the 9th day of JUne , 196% , at 8:00 o'
clock p.m. at which time said hearing was concluded and
closed; and
WHEREAS, no written protests were received and all
persons desiring to be heard were fully heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
That the City Council of the City of South San Fran-
cisco does declare that no majority protest against the
annexation entitled "Westborough Inhabited Area Annexation"
has been made by owners of property within the territory
proposed to be annexed, which territory is more fully des-
cribed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference
made a part hereof.
I hereby certify tbmt the foregoing Resolution was
regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of
the City of South San Francisco at an adjourned regular
meeting held on the 9th day of June ,
by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN
NOES,
ABSENT, "
19 6~
Patrick E. Ahern, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio
Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi
None
None
Attest:~
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO.
DECLARING THAT A MA3ORITY PROTEST HAS
NOT BEEN MADE IN THE WESTBOROUGH IN-
HABITED AREA ANNEXATION
WESTBOROUGH. INHABITED... AREA ANHEXATION · ~ . .
All,chat certain real~:pr~per~y situata in the County of San ~i!
Mat~O~;Sta~e~f Cai/fora'La, being Tracts 796, 798, 802 and
WestbO~oU~;~re particularly described as follows:
BlGINNINGatithe most easterly corner of Lot 12 in Block 15,.
as said Lot ind Block are shown on the map entitled "TRACT~0.~.
808, ~STBOROUGHURX~ NO. 2, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ,,:,:..:,
filed ~Sep~ember 14, 1962 in Book ~6 of Maps at Pages 43,14. and
~, San;Marco County Records; thence along the general north-
easterly boundary of the~subdivision shown on sgid_map, the. il ....
followin~ 8ourses: N 60~55' W 90.00 feet, N 29u05' E,78.22
feet', N~5 28' W 925.61 feet; thence tangent to
:~aeourse'northwesterly along ~he arc of a curve to the rizht
~having a radius of 490.00 feeble-and a central angle of 1~°53',
~j~.~:arc disCs,ct of 118.73 feet;. ~hence tangent to the preced
~!?~cu~ve N &1°35' W 472.82 feet~ thenca tangent to the pre-
~aing course northwesterly along the arc of a curve to thai"'
~ht~.havin$ a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of
~6'7~15', an arc distance of 352.12 feet; thence tansent to
~!P~cgding curve g Z5°40' E 264.53 feet, N 64°20' W~lSO.00
S 25040' W 5.00 feet, N 64020' W 559.75 feet, N 76u39'51'' W
154.82 feet, and from a mngent that bears N 6°15' W, along the
arc of a curve to ~he left having a radius of 530.00 fee~
O I
a central&n$1e~offl9 40 46 , an arc distance of 18Z,O& feet
~he most northerly~.Corner of Parcel C in Block 23, as~said Parcel
and Block are sho~m%'onsaid map; thenge alon~ the northwesterly
line of said parcel C, Block 23, S 59u12' W 80.09 feet, and '
~angent to the ~receding course southwesterly along th~. arc,flor
a curve tOo~he.risht~havinS a radius of 745.00 feet and a cen~rai
angle of, 0?-lZ'13";~ia~ aec distance of 2.65 feet to the~nor~h~
easterly~-corner.o: ~h~.~subdivis~on.sh_own on the map
CALI~IA", recorded ~ay" 1, 1962 in Book 56 of Maps a~ ~a~eal
14 and 15, San Marco County Records; thence along the-general~'
northerly line of said subdivision the following course8:~ ':~
from a tansent that bears S 59 24'13" W, along the arc of a
curve to~:thl.ri~ht having a radius of 7&5.00 feet and a central
anxle of~'~l 7", an arc distance of 174.41 feet, thence
S~[7°11' ~ 14.00 feet, S 73°57' W 30.02 feet, N l&~5§' ~ 14.00
i£eet, thence from atangent that bears S 75°05' W along the
~..T'Of a Curve co Cheori~c having a radius of 745.00 feet and
~Cral ao~e of 44 50 31", an arc disCance of 583.07.feeC,~.
~e ~ 60°~'29'' w 115.02 feec co the norcheascerlF'corner of~
:~~LvLsLon~ibovn on the amp entitled TRACf N0.798~" ,.,
~~U~Tr.~O.tB, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORHIA , re
~~,.;~Septembe~13,~,1961 in,Book 5~ of Naps at Pages:16 and~~:
~a'/M~teo C~Untv'Records, thence along the general northerly.~,:-
'~o£oaid subdivision'the following courses: N 60°04'~9"'..''
W79[13 feet; thence tangent to the preceding course
315.12..~t~i thence tanF~__nt
the _arc of a .curve co t
of 12~."~0.U.£eec and a cenCra~ a~
discauie 0~' '703.66 feet; thence W 499
norChees~.Or!~, corner of said TRACT NO. 798;
leneraL"~Chwescerly line o~ last sai~ ~acc S
~eeC, S:/~7°~2'' ~ ~00.00 ~t, and S 22 ~8' E
nozt~e~;~? co~z oE t~ subdivision
s~c~ee~tly l~ne of
~ 67°~2' .~E '2,.00 ieee,
westerly Co~r t~reo~, last S~id nc
co~or&c~,lii~te line of C~ City Of San Ca
by ~din~ce~. 688 ~sc. Ord. ~. 53) adopted bY t~
c~ncfl oi t~ City o[ san B~o on July !1~,, 1956 ~n
alon~.:..t~ ~o~ce limits line o[ san Bruno
8~t~rly ~RS' 'of said tracts 796, 80~ and 808 the
E 9B~;~'~e~ 89~07'5Y' E ~0.73 feeC Co a
San. ~~'a~lLb~'a ~ ~neral, aster 'line of said
Ho~h' ~.~' hoC.', 'Sol9' ~2" E '9~ .89 ~ H,,
E, =~ 20.'5~ .-S 1L5.79 ~eet, N ~ 6 E 126.29
X, 'B 'tM~L1' feet to t~ ~o~nt ~inn~g and