HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-07-13 e-packetU 6
■ �
C ICIFOY'L
AGENDA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 2011
6:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at
6:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco,
California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non - Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment.
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and /or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for
your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Board action.
KEVIN MULLIN
Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARINO
Vice Chair
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Boardmember
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Boardmember
KRISTA MARTINELLI
Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING- IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open
session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the
City Clerk's Office located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it
relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The
address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve the minutes of March 16, 2011, June 8, 2011 and June 22, 2011.
2. Motion to approve expense claims of July 13, 2011.
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JULY 13, 2011
AGENDA PAGE 2
SPECIAL MEETING
s� MINUTES
y REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY"
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, California 94083
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2011
�
1. Call to Order: 7:02 p.m.
2. Roll Call. Present: Councilmembers Addiego, Gonzalez
and Matsumoto, Vice Mayor
Garbarino and Mayor Mullin.*
Absent: None.
* For Convenience Purposes, these
minutes apply the convention of
referring to RDA Boardmembers
with their Council titles through the
body of these minutes reflecting
discussion at the joint meeting.
3. Agenda Review.
None.
4. Public Comments - Comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda.
None.
5. Consideration of Proposal from Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center.
Staff and Council reviewed and discussed a proposal from the Peninsula Conflict Resolution
Center ( "PCRC "). It was noted that PCRC promotes positive collaboration and active
engagement by residents in the community. PCRC trains people to communicate and problem
solve together, facilitates group meetings, builds skills for public participation and, as a neutral
third party, assists people in conflict to develop mutually acceptable agreements.
An outline of the proposal of services for the City of South San Francisco included: coordinating
and facilitating a Strategic Planning Process, supporting existing efforts through partnerships
with the SSF Police Department, and staffing on -going support of Community Coalition for Safe
Neighborhoods.
Council expressed some concerns over the citizen complaint portion of the plan, but overall felt
it was a positive step. Concerns were also expressed about the allocation and use of funding
towards aspects of the program. The item would be discussed and voted on at the next regularly
scheduled council meeting.
6. Public Hearing:
S /SKS Investments /applicant
Oyster Pt Ventures, LLC /owner
379 OYSTER POINT BLVD
P09 -0085: GPA11 -0001, SP11 -0001, DR09 -0049, ZA11 -0001, RZ11 -0001,
PPI1 -0001, DA11 -0001, DDAI 1 -0001 & EIR09 -0001.
Oyster Point Redevelopment Project, including a General Plan Amendment,
Redevelopment Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment (Specific
Plan), Rezone (Zoning Map Amendment), Specific Plan Appendix, Precise
Plan, Transportation Demand Management Plan, Design Review,
Development Agreement, Disposition and Development Agreement, and
Environmental Impact Report to allow the demolition of various existing
improvements and the construction of a new office and research and
development campus at a 1.25 FAR, road alignment, utilities, park, open
space, marina improvements (i.e. parking areas), Bay Trail improvements and
public restrooms on approximately 82 acres of property located at the eastern
end of Oyster Point Boulevard and adjacent to the Oyster Point Marina, in
accordance with SSFMC Title 19, and Chapters 20.040, 20.110, 20.230,
20.300, 20.310, 20.360, 20.400, 20.450, 20.460, 20.480, 20.530, 20.540, and
20.550.
Public Hearing opened: 7:30 p.m.
Associate Planner Gerry Beaudin presented the staff report. Oyster Point Ventures, LLC
( "OPV "), a joint venture between Shorenstein Properties and SKS Investments LLC, owns
property commonly known as the Oyster Point Business Park, and located at the terminus of
Oyster Point Boulevard; and the City of South San Francisco owns property commonly known as
the Oyster Point Marina Property, adjacent to the Oyster Point Business Park. OPV and the City
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 2
desire to redevelop the Oyster Point Business Park and the Oyster Point Marina Property
(collectively, "Project Site) with an office/R &D life sciences campus, commercial, hotel,
recreational, and public open space uses.
The proposed Project is consistent and compatible with all elements in the City of South San
Francisco General Plan (as proposed for amendment). The 1999 General Plan includes policies
and programs that are designed to encourage the development of high technology campuses in
the East of 101 Area, allow for employee- serving services, preparation of a Traffic Demand
Management Plan to reduce congestion impacts. Consistent with these policies, the Oyster Point
Specific Plan and Phase I Project provides for the phased removal and replacement of existing
buildings on the Project Site and phased construction of an office /R &D development at an FAR
of 1.25 on the western portion of the Project Site, including a "Phase I" development consisting
of grading and refuse relocation for the initial three buildings and a parking structure, as well as
employee - serving amenities pursuant to a preliminary Transportation Demand Management Plan,
and additional public amenities including creation of waterfront open space, a promenade along
the realigned Oyster Point and Marina Boulevards, construction of a flexible -use recreation area,
grading and site preparation of the future hotel parcel, as well as realignment, reconfiguration,
replacement, and improvement to existing roadways and infrastructure to facilitate the
development, subject to the terms of the Project entitlements including the proposed
Development Agreement. Approval of the Project, including the proposed Development
Agreement, will not impede achievement of General Plan policies.
The Project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare
of the City, because the Project proposes redevelopment of an underutilized Project Site, which
will result in an office and research and development campus -like facility, with substantial public
amenities, including enhanced and improved access to the bay front and public open space. The
Project will also facilitate repair of the landfill clay cap and upgrades to utilities and
infrastructure at the Project Site.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the land use being proposed.
The General Plan specifically contemplates the proposed type of project, and the suitability of the
site for the proposed development was analyzed thoroughly in the Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the Project.
The Development Agreement would clarify and obligate several project features and mitigation
measures including payment of fees for traffic impacts, childcare impacts, public art, and other
infrastructure improvements, payment of certain future fees, including a Parks and Recreation
Fee and Fire Department Fee should the City adopt such fees before December 31, 2012, as well
as a $1.l million cash payment. The Director of Economic and Community Development
reviewed the application for the Agreement and found the proposed Agreement to be in the
proper form, determined that the application was complete, and referred the application and
Agreement to the Planning Commission who approved both the project plan and development
agreement.
Councilwoman Matsumoto requested further information regarding the following items: specific
sizes of the designated boxes for landscaping, public art features, the TDM plan relative to
projected population and employment growth, and the presence of bike lanes.
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 3
Councilman Addiego asked about the 40% target outlined in the TDM plan and a penalty that
would be assessed for non compliance. Planner Gerry Beaudin gave specific sizes for the
designated boxes, explained the public art options, and clarified the penalty fees for non TDM
compliance as $27,000 plus, with the fees going back into the TDM plan. He also verified the
presence of designated bike lanes throughout the plan as well as other bike improvements.
Director Van Duyn stated irrespective of numbers, the TDM plan had to be aggressive in order to
meet the projected growth. Vice Mayor Garbarino added perhaps a collaborative effort by
future /potential residents in the plan area could create an agreement with transportation providers
similar to that done by Genentech regarding shuttle service. Councilman Gonzalez mentioned
Genentech used to compensate employees for using public transportation.
Councilman Gonzalez asked if there would be any locations for people to congregate for resting
or having lunch, etc. He also had questions regarding parking, whether or not the number of
spaces was greater than necessary considering the public transportation options. As for job
opportunities, he wondered if it was possible to give hiring preference to the residents of South
San Francisco, not that he would deny other people from coming to the City for work. Lastly,
during the construction phase, he wanted to have Union employment.
Attorney Mattas noted in the development agreement, a prevailing wage was stipulated and
would be an obligation for the project.
Councilman Addiego expressed excitement over Phase I and was impressed with the design of
the buildings and how they complimented the water.
Vice Mayor Garbarino appreciated the inclusion of a childcare center in the area. He wanted to
use the Genentech childcare center as a model, as he found that to be a top notch facility. He
wanted to make sure the fuel efficient vehicle parking would include hybrid cars as well as
electric vehicles. The secured bicycling facility talked about may be the perfect opportunity for
an entrepreneur to open a bike shop. Lastly, he seconded Councilman Gonzalez' comments on
the hope that Union labor would be used, as it was important to the City. The developer agreed
with all of the Vice Mayor's sentiments. In response to the Union request, he noted Shorenstein
and SKS had a long history and positive relationship with the labor unions. He would be happy
to put council in touch with the Trade Unions and noted the intention to use Union labor just as
they do with their San Francisco projects.
Mayor Mullin shared the excitement expressed by the rest of Council and thanked staff for all
their efforts. He questioned the potential number of construction jobs created by Phase 1. Exact
figures were not available at the time. The Mayor mentioned the City's Caltrain station was in
danger and advised the developer to watch the deliberations closely and advocate for keeping it
open, as it was a vital component of the development. He queried the status of the childcare fund
from the in lieu fees. Director Van Duyn did not have exact numbers at the moment but could
come back with the information.
Mayor Mullin further queried the impact of potential changes to RDA. City Attorney Mattas
stated there were resolutions being drafted allowing the project to continue under ownership of
the City rather than RDA. Mayor Mullin noted he had contacted other local officials, Senator
Yee and Assembly Member Hill, to schedule a meeting regarding the future of RDA. In terms of
sea Ievel rise, he asked for an explanation of the grading referred to in the documents. Planner
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 4
Beaudin explained the design perspective allowing a "gentle sloping," and trash relocation in a
manner that would raise up the development sight.
Councilwoman Matsumoto had farther questions about sidewalks. Planner Beaudin stated the
Palm Promenade was designed to be the primary, path systems and sidewalks available. The
Councilwoman expressed concern about seniors' mobility on pathways. Planner Beaudin asked
if it was the material or some other aspect. He noted paths would be ADA accessible and
drainage would be an ongoing maintenance issue, but maintaining ADA compliance was
paramount. Lastly, she wanted there to be a bike share program.
Public Hearing Closed: 9:15 p.m.
Motion — Councilman Addiego /Second — Vice Mayor Garbarino: to waive reading and introduce
an ordinance amending Chapter 20.230 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to repeal
Oyster Point Marina Specific Plan District regulations, and adopt the Oyster Point Specific Plan
to facilitate the public- private redevelopment of an office /research & development campus and
substantial public amenities at the Oyster Point Business Park and Oyster Point Marina property.
Unanimously approved by voice vote.
Motion — Councilman Gonzalez /Second — Vice Mayor Garbarino: to waive reading and
introduce an ordinance adopting a development agreement with the Oyster Point Ventures, LLC
for the public - private redevelopment of an office /research & development campus and
substantial public amenities at the Oyster Point Business Park and Oyster Point Marina
properties. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
Motion — Vice Mayor Garb arino /Second — Councilman Gonzalez: to continue the public hearing to
March 23, 2011. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
7. CIosed Session: Conference with Real Property Negotiators
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Properties: APN 015- 010 -600, 015 -190 -190, 015 -010 -260, 015- 010 -060
(Commonly known as the King Leases at Oyster Point Marina)
Agency Negotiator: Marty Van Duyn
Parties: South San Francisco, S /SKS, San Mateo County Harbor District
Under Negotiation: Terms for acquisition of property and leases.
Recess: 9:20 p.m.
Meeting Resumed: 9 :28 p.m.
Closed Session began: 9:28 p.m.
Open Session resumed. 9:40 p.m.
Report out of Closed Session: Direction given, no reportable action taken.
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 5
Adjournment.
Being no further business Mayor Mullin adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
Submitted:
City Cle'rk—arfd'Agtcy Clerk,
City of South San Fr ncisco and
South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
Approved:
Kevin Mullin
Mayor and Chairperson
City of South San Francisco and
South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MELTING MARCH 16, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 6
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 2011
6:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
..
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at
61:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco,
California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non- Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment..
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for
your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Board action.
KEVIN MULLIN
Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARTNO
Vice Chair
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Boardmember
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Boardmember
KRISTA MARTINELLI
Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING - IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open
session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the
City Clerk's Ojftce located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it
relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The
address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.
MINUTES
H
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
U
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 2011
6:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
..
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency
business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each month at
61:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco,
California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non- Agendized item, please
complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk.
Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment..
California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda
(except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation
and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive
action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for
the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for
your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, it will be ready for Board action.
KEVIN MULLIN
Chair
RICHARD A. GARBARTNO
Vice Chair
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Boardmember
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Boardmember
KRISTA MARTINELLI
Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING - IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open
session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the
City Clerk's Ojftce located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it
relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The
address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
No changes
PUBLIC COMMENTS
TIME: 6:34 p.m.
PRESENT: Boardmembers Addiego and Gonzalez, Vice
Chair Garbarino and Chair Mullin
ABSENT: Boardmember Matsumoto
Buon Gusto owner, Carmelo Lacolino, stated after receiving the bids for the scope of work, it was
apparent additional funds would be necessary to continue on with the project and requested the
Agency approved an additional $100,000 for the restaurant's renovation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of March 2, 2011 and May 11, 2011.
Boardmember Addiego requested minutes be presented for approval in a timelier manner as to
remember the comments made more clearly.
2. Motion to approve expense claims of June 8, 2011.
3. Resolution approving additional loan amount of $75,000 for the Buon Gusto Ristorante
expansion and authorizing the executive director to execute loan documents.
Motion — Boardmember Garbarino /Second — Boardmember Gonzalez: to approve expense
claims of June 8, 2011 and approve RDA Resolution No. 21 -2011. Unanimously approved by
voice vote.
ADMMSTRATIVE BUISNESS
4. Resolution Confirming City Treasurer's Appointment of Deputy City Treasurers and
certifying the City's Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2011 -2012.
City Treasurer Richard Battaglia presented Frank Risso as the new Deputy City Treasurer.
Chair Mullin welcomed him and stated he was looking forward to working with him.
Boardmember Addiego commented he had pleasure of meeting and knowing Mr. Risso from
other groups and functions, was pleased by the appointment and looked forward to his service.
Motion — Vice Chair Garbarino /Second — Boardmember Gonzalez: to approve RDA Resolution
No. 22 -2011. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING f NE 8, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 2
Motion — Boardmember Addiego /Second — Vice Chair Garbarino: to approve RDA Resolution
Noy 23 -2411. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business, Chair Mullin adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m.
Submitted by: Approved by:
Anna M. Brown, Deputy City Clerk
Redevelopment Agency
City of South San Francisco
Kevin Mullin, Chairperson
Redevelopment Agency
City of South San Francisco
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MINUTES
JUNE 8, 2011
PAGE
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
M
�'I LIFOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, California 94083
Meeting to be held at:
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2011
1. Call to Order. Time: 6:34 p.m.
2. Roll Call. Present: Boardmembers Addiego and
Gonzalez, Vice Chairman
Garbarino and Chairman Mullin.
Absent: Boardmember Matsumoto.
3. Agenda Review.
Executive Director of the Agency Nagel recommended that items 6 and 7 be held over and
heard contemporaneously with the budget items included on the City Council Agenda for the
evening.
Boardmembers agreed.
4. Public Comments —comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting
Agenda.
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Submittal of Annual Redevelopment reports to the State Controller as required
by California Health & Safety Code 33080.1.
Motion— Boardmember Garbarino /Second— Boardmember Gonzalez: to approve Consent
Calendar Item No. 5. Approved by the following voice vote: AYES: Boardmembers Addiego
and Gonzalez, Vice Chairman Garbarino and Chairman Mullin. NOES: None. ABSTAIN:
None. ABSENT: Boardmember Matsumoto.
CLOSED SESSION
8. Real Property Negotiations
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Agency Negotiator: Marty Van Duyn
related to:
315 -321 Airport Blvd.
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
401 Airport Blvd.
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
411 Airport Blvd.
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
421 Airport Blvd.
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
216 Miller Avenue
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
405 Cypress Avenue
Owner: The Gonzalez Family Trust
Closed Session opened: 6:36 p.m.
Meeting resumed: 6:55 p.m.
Report out of Closed Session: Chairman Mullin requested that Attorney Mattas
relay the action taken in closed session.
Attorney Mattas advised the RDA was briefed on modifications to a purchase
agreement between the Gonzalez Family Trust, the City and the Agency. By a 4 -0
vote the Redevelopment Agency approved the changes attached to these minutes.
Recess: 6:56 p.m.
Meeting resumed: 8 :37 p.m.
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JUNE 22, 2011
MINUTES PAGE 2
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
6. Resolution 24 -2011 approving the Redevelopment Agency Operating Budget
for 2011- 2012.
After hearing the staff report that Budget Manager Tribby presented to the City Council and
the Redevelopment Agency Board simultaneously, the Agency took the following action:
Motion— Boardmember Garbarino /Second— Boardmember Gonzalez: to approve Resolution
No. 24 -2011. Approved by the following voice vote: AYES: Boardmembers Addiego and
Gonzalez, Vice Chairman Garbarino and Chairman Mullin. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: Boardmember Matsumoto.
** See Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 22, 2011 for a summary of the
staff report and discussion on this item.
7. Resolution Providing Interim Spending Authority for the First 60 Days of the
2011 -12 Fiscal Year.
Item not heard.
8. Adjournment.
Being no further business, Chairman Mullin adjourned the meeting at 8 :59 p.m.
Submitted
to Martir Ili
Clerk
City of South San Francisco
Approved:
Kevin Mullin
Redevelopment Agency Chairman
City of South San Francisco
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2011
PAGE, 3
3. Conveyance of Title. At the close of escrow for conveyance of the Property to Buyer
( "Close of Escrow "), Seller shall convey by grant deed to Buyer marketable fee simple title to
the Property, free and clear of all recorded and unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments,
leases and taxes except:
(a) Taxes for the fiscal year in which the escrow for this transaction closes, which
shall be prorated as of the Close of Escrow and handled in accordance with Section 4986 of the
California Revenue and Taxation Code;
(b) The Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area; and
(c) The items described as exception numbers in that certain
preliminary report for the Property dated 20 and issued by Title
Company (collectively, together with such other title exceptions as Buyer may approve in
writing, the "Permitted Exceptions ").
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Seller shall convey the Property to
Buyer free and clear of all monetary liens and encumbrances, including without limitation, liens
relating to delinquent taxes and assessments, deeds of trust, and other security instruments.
4. Escrow; Escrow_ Instructions Within five (5) business days following the Effective
Date, the Parties shall open an escrow to consummate the purchase and sale of the Property
pursuant to this Agreement at the office of Title Company located at
, Street, , CA ( "Title Company" or "Escrow
Agent ") or such other title company as may be mutually agreed upon by the Parties. Upon the
opening of escrow, the Parties shall deposit with the Escrow Agent an executed copy of this
Agreement, which shall serve as the joint escrow instructions of Buyer and Seller for this
transaction, together with such additional instructions as may be executed by the Parties and
delivered to the Escrow Agent.
5. Earnest Money Deposij of Purchase Price. Upon the opening of escrow
and in no event later than seven (7) business days after the Effective Date, B*Yef shall
deposit the sum of five thousand Dollars ($5,000) (the "Deposit ") into escrow in an interest
bearing account for the benefit of Buyer. The Deposit, and all interest earned thereon, shall be
applied to the Purchase Price at the Close of Escrow. Agency will deposit the balance of the
P chase Price less the amount of the Remediation Cost Estimate subiect to and as defined in
Section 12.1 into escrow in an interest bearing account for the benefit of Buyer within sixtv
60 days following the Effective Date.
If escrow fails to close because this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section
13 or because of non - satisfaction of Buyer's closing conditions in Section 11 , this Agreement
shall terminate, the Deposit and all interest earned thereon and all other sums deposited into
escrow by or on behalf Buyer shall be returned to Buyer, and thereafter neither Seller B. over. nor
Beyex en shall have any further obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein.
6. Title Documents. By not later than ten (10) business days following the Effective
Date, Buyer shall obtain an updated title report for the Property ( "Title Report"). Buyer shall
1666030.1 2
approve or disapprove each title exception, as set forth in the Title Report within twenty (20)
days following the Effective Date. Buyer's failure to approve the Title Report within such time
period shall be deemed to be a disapproval of the title exceptions.
If Buyer objects to, or is deemed to have disapproved any title exception, Seller shall use
its best efforts at Seller's sole expense to remove from title or otherwise satisfy each such
exception no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Close of Escrow and in a form that is
reasonably satisfactory to Buyer. If Seller fails to remove or satisfy any title exception to the
satisfaction of Buyer, Buyer shall have the option, in its sole discretion, to terminate this
Agreement, or to accept title subject to such exception. If Buyer elects to terminate this
Agreement, the P are -r a s e n..; ^° Deposit and all other funds and documents deposited into escrow
by or on behalf of Buyer shall be returned to Buyer, and thereafter neither Seller., Buyer nor
Agency shall have any further obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein.
It shall be a condition to the Close of Escrow that Title Company shall deliver to Buyer
no later than five (S) business days prior to the Close of Escrow, a title commitment for a CLTA
Owner's Title Insurance Policy ( "Title Policy ") (or at Buyer's election, an ALTA Owner's Title
Insurance Policy) to be issued by Title Company in the amount of the Purchase Price for the
benefit and protection of Buyer, showing fee simple title to the Property vested in Buyer, subject
only to the Permitted Exceptions, including such endorsements as may reasonably be requested
by Buyer, and committing Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer upon the Close of
Escrow.
7. ClosinlZ Documents and Funds.
(a) Seller.
(A) By no later than two (2) business days prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller
shall deposit into escrow all of the following:
(i) A Grant Deed, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit
B ( "Grant Deed "), duly executed and acknowledged, conveying to Buyer fee
simple title to the Property, subject only to Permitted Exceptions;
(ii) A bill of sale, executed by Seller in form acceptable to Buyer,
conveying to Buyer Seller's interest in the personal property identified therein
(the "Bill of Sale ");
(iii) Seller's affidavit of non- foreign status and Seller's certification that
Seller is a resident of California, each executed by Seller under penalty of perjury
as required by state and federal law;
(iv) An Assignment of Leases, executed by Seller in form acceptable to
Buyer, conveying to Buyer Seller's interest in the leases and rental agreements
identified therein (the ` =Assignment of Leases ");
1666030-11605 4 91. 3
(v) Evidence that all utilities payable with respect to the Property have
been paid prorated as of the Close of Escrow;
(vi) Tenant Estoppels (as described in Section 13.d)
(vii) All original leases, rental agreements and/or contracts to be
assumed by Buyer;
(viii) If applicable, an Assignment of Contracts, executed by Seller in
form acceptable to Buyer, conveying to Buyer Seller's interest in the contracts
identified therein (the "Assignment of Contracts "); and
(ix) Such additional duly executed instruments and documents as the
Escrow Agent may reasonably require to consummate the transaction
contemplated hereby.
(B) Unless Seller elects to have the following charges deducted from the funds
to be distributed to Seller at Close of Escrow, no later than one (1) business day prior to
Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into escrow immediately available funds in the
amount necessary to pay:
(i) funds in the amount necessary to pay Seller's share of closing costs
the TidePallie-, —e
and
(ii) all costs and expenses payable pursuant to Section 25 below.
(b) Buyer and Agency,
(A) By no later than two (2) business days prior to the Close of Escrow, Buyer
shall deposit into escrow all of the following:
(i) A duly executed Certificate of Acceptance in the form shown in
Exhibit B , as required by California Government Code Section 27281;
(ii) If applicable, the Assignment of Leases, executed by Buyer;
(iii) If applicable, the Assignment of Contracts, executed by Buyer; and
(iv) Such additional duly executed instruments and documents as the
Escrow Agent may reasonably require to consummate the transaction
contemplated hereby.
(B) No less than one (1) business day prior to the Close of Escrow,
Agency shall deposit into escrow immediately available funds in the amount
equal to:
165603 0.1 4
(i) the Narehase Nee (less the I)eposit) as adjusted by any Pfor-a—tion's
e! en e ' t _ i) funds in the amount necessary to pay Buyer's share
of closing costs and the cost of the Title Policy in accordance with Section 9
below ct to �rnyprorations bQtvyeen the Parties,
8. Close of Escrow. The Parties intend to close escrow by August 31, 2011, provided
that all of Buyer's conditions to closing (described in Sections 11 and 13 below) have been
satisfied by such date, unless this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the terms hereof or
extended by mutual agreement of the Parties. The Escrow Agent shall close escrow by: (i)
causing the Grant Deed to be recorded in the official records of San Mateo County, California;
(ii) issuing the Title Policy and delivering same to Buyer; (iii) delivering to Seller the monies
constituting the Purchase Price less prorated amounts and charges to be paid by or on behalf of
Seller; (iv) delivering to Buyer a conformed copy of the Grant Deed indicating recording
information thereon; and (v) delivering to Buyer, if applicable, the Bill of Sale, Assignment of
Leases, and the Assignment of Contracts, each executed by Seller. Possession of the Property
shall be delivered to Buyer at the Close of Escrow.
9. Closing Costs. E;aeh PflAy and Seller shall each pay one -half (1/2) of all escrow
fees. Seller shall pay all governmental transfer taxes and conveyance fees and Buyer will pay all
recording fees. B_ yK_r_. 5e4ef will pay the cost of the Title Policy_;
10. Prorations. Property taxes shall be prorated as of the Close of Escrow based upon
the most recent tax bill available, including any property taxes which may be assessed after the
Close of Escrow but which pertain to the period prior to the transfer of title to the Property to
Buyer, regardless of when or to whom notice thereof is delivered.
11. Buyer's Conditions to Closing. The Close of Escrow and Buyer's obligation to
purchase the Property are conditioned upon satisfaction (or Buyer's waiver, exercisable in
Buyer's sole discretion) of each of the following: (i) the performance by Seller of each
obligation to be performed by Seller under this Agreement within the applicable time period, or
the waiver by Buyer of such obligation; (ii) Seller's representations and warranties contained in
this Agreement being true and correct as of the Effective Date and the Close of Escrow; (iii) the
commitment by Title Company to issue and deliver the Title Policy in the form required by
Buyer pursuant to Section 6 , subject only to the Permitted Exceptions; (iv) Buyer's approval of
the condition of the Property and other matters pursuant to Section 13 ; aPA --(v) approval of the
purchase of the Property by Buyer's governing board: and (yi) completion of both a Phase 2
env analysis of the Property and a cost estimate for remediation of Hazardous
Materials on the Property pursuant to Section 12.1.
Should any condition to closing fail to occur, excepting any such conditions that have
been waived by Buyer, Buyer shall have the right, exercisable by giving written notice to Seller,
to cancel the escrow, terminate this Agreement, and recover the Deposit and all a e
deposited into escrow by or on behalf of Buyer, together with all interest earned thereon and any
and all other amounts paid by Buyer to Seller or deposited with the Escrow Agent by or on
behalf of Buyer and thereafter, neither Seller. Buyer nor Aaencv__shall have any further
1666030.1 5
obligations hereunder except gs expressly set forth herein The exercise of this right by Buyer
shall not constitute a waiver by Buyer of any other rights Buyer may have at law or in equity.
12. Studies Reports and Investigations. Seller agrees to make available to Buyer
within two (2) business days following the Effective Date, any and all correspondence with
governmental agencies, information, studies, reports, investigations, contracts, licenses, leases,
rental agreements and other documents concerning or relating to the Property which are in
Seller's possession or which are reasonably available to Seller (collectively, "Property
Documents "), including without limitation any CC&Rs affecting the Property and any analyses,
surveys, environmental site assessments, studies, reports and investigations concerning the
Property's physical, environmental or geological condition, habitability, or the presence or
absence of Hazardous Materials (defined in Section 17.1) in, on, under or about the Property and
the compliance by the Property with Environmental Laws (as defined in Section 17.1)
12.1 Phase 2 Report; Remediation Cost Estimate. Prior to the Close of Escrow.
Buyer shall cause its consultant to complete a Phase 2 environmental assessment of the Property
and a cost estimates for the remediation of Hazardous Materials on the Property ( "Remediation
Cost Estimate"). The Remcdiation Cost Estimate will be based upon applicable r u1 do s
and the assumption that the Property will be developed as a mixed use project that will include
either commercial or residential uses on the around level and above. If the Remediation Cost
Estimate is e ual to or less than the sum of Five Hundred Thousand DollarsL$500,000) n th
amount of the Remediation Cost Estimate shall be credited against the Purchase Price if the
Remediation Cost Estimate exceeds the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500.0001 then
either Seller or Buyer may terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the other
Parties in accordance with Section 26.3. In the event of such termination, all funds and
documents deposited into escrow by r on behalf of Buyga shall be returned tQ Buyu and all
rights and obligations hereunder shall terminate except as expressly provided herein.
Notwithstanding the foregoing. Seller shall have the right to prevent termination of this
Agreement by delivery of written notice to Buyer and Agency in accordance_with Section. 26.3 if
Seller agrees that the full amount ap
of the Remediation Cost Estimate will be plied as a credit
ag ainst the Purchase Price. If this Agreement is not terminated and th a Pro a is
completed pursuant to this Agreement, the Agenc will_nav anv .remediation costs that exceed
the Remediation Cost Estimate
13. Buyer's_ Additional Conditions to Closing. Buyer's obligation to purchase the
Property is conditioned upon Buyer's review and approval of the condition of the Property and
the Property Documents (defined in Section 12) pursuant to this Section.
(a) Feasibility Studies. During the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending
on the forty -fifth (45th) day thereafter or such later date as mutually agreed upon by
the Parties ( "Due Diligence Period ") Buyer may, at Buyer's expense, undertake an
inspection and review of the Property and analysis of the Property Documents,
including without limitation (i) review and analysis of the physical condition of the
Property, including but not limited to, inspection and examination of soils,
environmental factors, Hazardous Materials, and archeological information relating to
the Property; (ii) a review and investigation of the effect of any zoning, maps,
1666030-11605491.1 6
permits, reports, engineering data, regulations, ordinances, and laws affecting the
Property, and (iii) an evaluation of the Property to determine its feasibility for Buyer's
intended use. Buyer may consult with or retain civil engineers, contractors, soils and
geologic engineers, architects and other specialists in its investigation, and may
consult with or retain other consultants to determine if the Property is suitable for
Buyer's intended use.
require addifienal time to d e t erm i ne t
exisieiiee and extent ef any Hazafdeus Materials en the , Buyer shall have
the right exer-eigable by delivefin., . —R— --tiee te Seller prior- to !he expiration 4
the Due Diligenee , The Due Diligence Period and the date for
Close of Escrow shall be extended for -up-te twenty (20) additional days to eemplete
the -tes in order to hermit T3uyet's onyironmental consultants time to complete a
Phase 2 environmental assessment of the Property and a cost estimate for remediation
of Hazardous Materials on the Property.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein the Parties agree that Clos
of Escrow shall not take place prior to the completion of both a Phase 2
environmental analysis of the Property and -a cost estimate for remediation of
Hazardous Materials on the Property pursuant to Section 12J. Notwithstanding the
preceding sentence if the cost estimate for the remediation is not com lete within the
Due Diligence Period and extension set forth herein the parties may by mutual
agreement. extend the due diligence period or eith ervatty may terminate this
agreement.
(b}- b�Other matters. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may inspect, examine,
survey and review any other matters concerning the Property, including without
Iimitation, any and all studies or reports or Property Documents provided by Seller,
all contracts, leases, licenses, rental agreements and other obligations relating to the
Property, and the Property's conformity with all applicable laws and regulations.
(c) Rent Roll, Tenant Leases. Within five (5) business days following the Effective
Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer a current rent roll, certified by Seller, listing for
each tenant of any part of the Property, all of the following: tenant name, premises
occupied, monthly rent, amount of deposit, amount of prepaid rent, and term of lease.
Within five (5) business days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to
Buyer certified copies of all tenant leases, including any amendments and
modifications. On or before the Close of Escrow, Seller shall assign all of Seller's
rights and remedies under the tenant Ieases, including the right to any security
deposits and prepaid rent, to Buyer pursuant to an assignment of leases and security
deposits in form and substance satisfactory to Buyer (the "Assignment of Leases ").
(d) Estoppel Certificates. No later than ten (10) business days after the Effective Date,
Seller shall deliver to Buyer an estoppel certificate in form satisfactory to Buyer
executed by each Tenant of the Property. Seller shall deliver updated estoppel
1666030.1160-549-1.1 7
(h) Seller has disclosed to Buyer all information, records, and studies in Seller's
possession or reasonably available to Seller relating to the Property concerning Hazardous
Materials and their use, storage, spillage or disposal on the Property;
(i) Seller has not received any notice from any governmental authority of any threatened
or pending environmental violation that has not previously been corrected, and no condition on
the Property violates any Environmental Law;
(j) there are no land use controls or other restrictions (other than zoning limitations) that
would prohibit certain uses on the Property; and
(k) Seller has disclosed all material facts concerning the environmental condition of the
Properly.
19. Environmental Indemnity Te Subiect to Section 12.1. to the fullest extent
allowed by law, Seller agrees to unconditionally and fully indemnify, protect, defend (with
counsel satisfactory to Buyer), and hold Buyer and the Agency, and their respective elected and
appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, consultants and contractors harmless from and
against any and all claims (including without limitation third party claims for personal injury,
real or personal property damage, or damages to natural resources), actions, administrative
proceedings (including without limitation both formal and informal proceedings), judgments,
damages, punitive damages, penalties, fines, costs (including without limitation any and all costs
relating to investigation, assessment, analysis or clean up of the Property), liabilities (including
without limitation sums paid in settlements of claims), interest, or losses, including reasonable
attorneys' and paralegals' fees and expenses (including without limitation any such fees and
expenses incurred in enforcing this Agreement or collecting any sums due hereunder), together
with all other costs and expenses of any kind or nature (collectively, the "Costs ") that arise
directly or indirectly from or in connection with the presence, suspected presence, release, or
suspected release, of any Hazardous Materials in, on or under the Property or in or into the air,
soil, soil gas, groundwater, or surface water at, on, about, around, above, under or within the
Property, or any portion thereof, except those Costs that arise solely as a result of actions by
Buyer. The indemnification provided pursuant to this Section shall specifically apply to and
include claims or actions brought by or on behalf of employees of Seller or any of its
predecessors in interest and Seller hereby expressly waives any immunity to which Seller may
otherwise be entitled under any industrial or worker's compensation laws. In the event the Buyer
suffers or incurs any Costs, Seller shall pay to Buyer the total of all such Costs suffered or
incurred by the Buyer upon demand therefore by Buyer. The indemnification provided pursuant
to this Section shall include, without limitation, all loss or damage sustained by the Buyer due to
any Hazardous Materials: (a) that are present or suspected by a governmental agency having
jurisdiction to be present in the Property or in the air, soil, soil gas, groundwater, or surface water
at, on, about, above, under, or within the Property (or any portion thereof) or to have emanated
from the Property, or (b) that migrate, flow, percolate, diffuse, or in any way move onto, into, or
under the air, soil, soil gas, groundwater, or surface water at, on, about, around, above, under, or
within the Properly (or any portion thereof) after the date of this Agreement as a result of Seller's
or its predecessors' activities on the Property. The provisions of this Section shall survive the
termination of this Agreement and the CIose of Escrow.
1666030-1 12
Listing of RDA Payments for Council Review
..mot =o.•
I certify that the payments shown on this payment register are
accurate and sufficient funds were available for payment.*
DATED
FINANCE DIRECTOR
*Note: Items below do not include payroll related payments
Checks
Date
Amount
06/06/11
37,918.84
06/08/11
13,823.71
06/13/11
733.03
06/15/11
5,973.03
06/20/11
11,824.44
06/22/11
14,582.13
06/27/11
58,707.45
06/29/11
1,301.55
07/06/11
6,701,474.11
(Includes annual pass- through payments)
Electronic Payments
Date Amount To
Description
Total Payments $ 6,846,338.29
Page 1 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
06/06/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE #
CHECK #
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
204786
CHARLES M. SALTER ASSOC INC.
1,263.20
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0034747
204795
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
899.35
5/5 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ECR CHESTNUT
B2086983
204802
GATEWAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC
503.42
POA DUES FOR GATEWAY CHLDCARE CENTER
RD 1677171
EFT
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK
490.00
RDA CITY ATTY FEES - 738.011
2011040185
204842
PRECISE PRINTING AND MAILING
390.14
ECR CHESTNUT 5/5 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
6350
EFT
4,993.75
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR RDA HOUSING
04/25- 05/05/11
ARMANDO SANCHEZ
3,742.64
PLAN AMENDMENT
10953
204855
SEIFEL CONSULTING INC
21,187.00
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SUSTAINABILITY
invoice #7
204862
SUSAN MCCUE AND ASSOCIATES
180.06
NF- LODGING- CRA CONFERENCE IN SAN JOSE
CC210235
204869
U S BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM
649.28
SK- ECRCHESNUT 5/5 PUBLIC HEARING POSTAGE
cc210379
204869
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY
$34,298.84
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Dept 99 CIP
3,620.00
GRADING EL CAMINO HOUSING PROJ #740 -04.1
05/27/11
204815
JMB CONSTRUCTION INC
Payments Issued for CIP
$3,620.00
Payments Made on 61612011
$37,918.84
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
Page 2 of 94
06/08/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION INVOICE # CHECK #
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK
13,823.71 RDA CITY ATTY FEES - 738.001 2011040183 EFT
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $13,823.71
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 6/8/2011 $13,823.71
Page 3 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
06/13/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
BLUE COLLAR LANDSCAPING 160.00 MONTHLY LANDSCAPING RENTAL PROPERTIES
SSF SCAVENGER CO INC
WESTERN EXTERMINATOR CO
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 611312011
159.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
25.81 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
25.84 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
49.25 MAY11 GARBAGE SERVICE -339 COMMERCIAL
49.25 MAY11 GARBAGE SERVICE -341 COMMERCIAL
73.88 MAY11 GARBAGE SERVICE -310 MILLER AVE
98.50 MAY11 GARBAGE SERVICE -312 MILLER AVE
91.50 MAY11 BILL -306 SPRUCE RENTAL PROPERTY
$733.03
$ 733.03
INVOICE #
88
96
90
89
2301272
2301273
2301693
2301694
008 - 01065148 -7
CHECK #
204972
204972
204972
204972
205098
205098
205098
205098
205121
Page 4 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
06/15/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
THE SWENSON GROUP, INC. 93.03
WILSEY HAM, INC 5,880.00
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $5,973.03
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 611512011 $5,973.03
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
CITYWIDE COPIERS CHGS FOR 3/11/11
SURVEYS, ALTA DR., ETC.
INVOICE # CHECK #
90712 205216
7574 205227
Page 5 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
06/20/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 380.00 05/28 ECR /CHESTNUT NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION
PRECISE PRINTING AND MAILING 714.46 5/26 ECR - CHESTNUT PUBLIC HEARING
ARMANDO SANCHEZ 4,993.75 CONSULTANT SERVICES / RDA HOUSING
SEIFEL CONSULTING INC 5,736.23 RDA - PLAN AMENDMENT - 2010
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $11,824.44
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 612012011 $11,824.44
INVOICE #
B2099272
6515
05/06- 05/19/11
10924
CHECK #
205264
205321
EFT
205338
Page 6 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
06/22/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
ALLIED SECURITY ALARMS 438.00 MONITORING ALARM #1 CHESTNUT
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK 11,040.13 RDA CITY ATTY FEES - 738.001
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $11,478.13
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Dept 99 CIP
CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 3,104.00 ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION ORANGE PK
Payments Issued for CIP $3,104.00
Payments Made on 612212011 $14,582.13
INVOICE #
81588
2011050169
6635 -3
CHECK #
205367
EFT
205387
Page 7 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
0612712011
VENDOR NAME INVOI
Dept 00 NON EXPENSE ACCT
O'DONOGHUE CONSTRUCTION
Payments Issued for NON EXPENSE ACCT
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOC
DYETT & BHATIA
GATEWAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC
HEART OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
ARMANDO SANCHEZ
SEIFEL CONSULTING INC
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP
VAN METER WILLIAMS POLLACK
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 612712011
CE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
972.90 REPAIRS AT 341 B COMMERCIAL
$972.90
3,750.00
LEGAL DEFENSE FUND ASSESSMENT #2
3906.5
205462
8,408.18
ECR /CHESTNUT AREA PLAN CONSULTANT
10- 433 -19
205478
503.42
POA DUES FOR GATEWAY CHLDCARE CENTER
RD 1685232
205487
23,257.00
HEART ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 7/1/11- 6/30/12
FY11 -12
205489
4,993.75
CONSULTANT SERVICES-
05/20- 06/09/11
EFT
7,447.53
RDA - PLAN AMENDMENT - 2010
10973
205537
332.00
REPAIR ELEV. 306 SPRUCE TICK. #22110363
1125054723
205554
9,042.67
BREEZEWAY 4TH LANE
1007.1 INV #4
205559
INVOICE #
06/14/11
CHECK #
205511
$57,734.55
$58,707.45
Page 8 of 94
Printed on: 07/07/2011
06/29/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
VENDOR NAME INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
THE SWENSON GROUP, INC. 104.75 COPIER CHGS FOR MAR -APRIL 2011
U S BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 1,196.80 MVD- BIO CONF WASHINGTON AIRLINE T
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $1,301.55
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 612912011 $1,301.55
INVOICE #
92110
CC212270
CHECK #
205669
205671
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
Page 9 of 94
07/06/2011
VENDOR NAME
INVOICE AMOUNT
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE #
CHECK #
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST
1,176.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205687
1,191.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205687
57.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205687
99.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205687
COLMA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL DIST
17,335.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205693
1,351.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205693
MAZE & ASSOCIATES
1,350.00
MAY AUDIT SERVICES
26758
205718
SAN MATEO COUNTY
172,651.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
40,290.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
58,601.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
8,440.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
97,948.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
14,604.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205739
SAN MATEO COUNTY
19,856.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
20,109.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
30,497.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
971.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
5,349.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
1,680.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205740
SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER'S
133,344.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
1,468,507.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
3,804,009.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
6,518.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
44,901.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
11,279.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205741
SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRI
1,983.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205742
2,009.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205742
97.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205742
168.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205742
SSF UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
227,151.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205754
348,874.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205754
11,104.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205754
126,489.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205754
19,215.00
RDA 2010 -11 PASS - THROUGH PAYMENTS
FY 2010 -11
205754
Printed on: 07/07/2011
City of South San Francisco
Payment Listing for Redevelopment Agency Board Review
Payments Issued between 6/2/2011 and 7/6/2011
Page 10 of 94
07/06/2011
INVOICE AMOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE # CHECK #
VENDOR NAME
Dept 10 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICES #67 21.11 CITY HALL LUNCH RM 1ST AID KIT SUPPLY
Payments Issued for ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY $6,701,474.11
DEVELOPMENT DEPT
Payments Made on 71612011 $6,701,474.11
0163205077
205769
Total REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENTS $6,846,338.29