HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuccessor Reso 01-2012 RESOLUTION NO. 01 -2012
SUCCESSOR AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
ADOPTING A DRAFT RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION
PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS) PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177(1)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 08 -2012, adopted January 25, 2012, the City of
South San Francisco ( "City ") affirmed its agreement to serve as the successor agency to the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (the "Redevelopment Agency ")
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173 et seq.;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1), the successor agency to
a dissolved redevelopment agency is required to adopt a draft Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule ( "ROPS ") that lists all of the obligations that are "enforceable obligations" within the
meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 34177, and which identifies a source of payment for
each such obligation from among (i) the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, (ii) bond
proceeds, (iii) reserve balances, (iv) the administrative cost allowance, (v) revenues from rents,
concessions, interest earnings, and asset sales, and (vi) the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust
Fund established by the County Auditor - Controller to the extent no other source of funding is
available or payment from property tax is contractually or statutorily required;
WHEREAS, the draft ROPS must be (i) prepared by the successor agency by March 1,
2012, (ii) certified by an external auditor, (iii) submitted to and approved by the oversight board
that will be established to review successor agency actions, (iv) posted on the successor agency's
website, (v) transmitted to the County Auditor - Controller, and (vi) transmitted to the State
Controller and the State Department of Finance by April 15;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, acting in its
capacity as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San
Francisco, does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. The draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) attached hereto as
Exhibit A is hereby approved.
3. The City Manager or designee is authorized and directed to take all actions
necessary to implement this Resolution, including without limitation, the submittal of
the draft ROPS to the County Auditor - Controller, the Oversight Board, the State
Department of Finance and the State Controller, and the posting of this Resolution and
the draft ROPS on the City's website.
4. An amendment of the 2011 -12 operating budget for the City of South San
Francisco is approved to include within the budget for the City acting in its capacity as Successor
Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, budgeted appropriations for the items on the ROPS
schedule for 2011 -12.
5. The City Manager and the Finance Director, and their designees, are authorized and
directed to take such actions as necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the intent of
this Resolution, including without limitation, the establishment of separate accounts and funds as
necessary to appropriately document the receipts and expenditures of the City acting in its capacity
as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 22" day of
February, 2012 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Mark Addiego, Karyl Matsumoto, and Kevin Mullin,
Vice Mayor Pedro Gonzalez and Mayor Richard A. Garbarino
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
. ../116141111 - ,ger
0 Clerk
Name of Redevelopment Agency: South San Francisco EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 4 Pages
Project Area(s) Merged
February 16, 2012 5 :OOpm
RECOGNIZED OBLIGATIONS PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2012
Per AB 26 - Section 34167 and 34169
Funding Total Remaining Total Due During Payments by month
Project Name / Debt Obligation Source Payee Description Debt or Obligations Fiscal Year Jan Feb Mar April May June Six Month Total
1 20% Housin• Set Aside Obligation Gross TI Successor Housin• A•c Obligation for housin• •rojecls 11 -12 3,869,487.33 3,869,487.33 3,869,487.33 $ 3,869,487.33
11 Debt Sery Principal COPs 80% TI Bank of New York 1999 COPs Conference Center 4,610,000,00 165,000.00 165,000.00 $ 165,000.00
Debt Sery Interest COPs 80% TI Bank of New York 1999 COPs Conference Center 2,489,750.00 341,625.00 115,250.00 111,125.00 $ 226,375.00
Debt Sery Principal Tax Alloc Bonds 80°/o TI Bank of New York 2006 Tax Alloc Bonds (TABs) 64,530,000.00 2,925,000.00 1,490 000.00 $ 1,490,000.00
5) Debt Sery Interest Tax Alloc Bonds 80% TI Bank of New York 2006 Tax Alloc Bonds (TABS) 47,617,278.28 4,615,878.14 1,529,059.38 1,529,059.38 $ 3,058,118.76
6) Debt Sery Principal HUD 108 Loans 80 °. TI Bank of New York HUD 108 Loans 1,490,000.00 224,000.00 112,000.00 $ 112,000.00
7) Debt Sery Interest HUD 108 Loans 80% TI Bank of New York HUD 108 Loans 3,058,118.76 124,906.70 32,580.10 32,580.10 $ 65,160.20
8) Debt Sery Principal Hsg Rev Bonds 20% TI Bank of New York 1999 Housing revenue bonds 1,925,000.00 415,000.00 210,000.00 $ 210,000.00
9) Debt Sery Interest Hsg Rev Bonds 20% TI Bank of New York 1999 Housing revenue bonds 407,670,00 132,11000 42,465.00 42,465.00 $ 84,930.00
10) Bond Reserves COPs 80% TI Bank of New York Required by bond convenants 407,461.60 0.00 $ -
1 1) Bond Reserves Tax Alloc Bonds 80% TI Bank of New York Required by bond convenants 4,723,761.52 0.00 $ -
12) Bond Reserves Hsg Rev Bonds 20% TI Bank of New York Required by bond convenants 318,524.12 0.00 $ -
13 Bond Admin /Disclosure Costs COPs 80% TI Bank of New York /Willdan Costs to administer the bonds 93,600,00 5,200.00 10,950.00 5,200.00 $ 16,150.00
® Bond Admin /Disclosure Costs TABs 80% TI Bank of New York/Willdan Costs to administer the bonds 262,800.00 10,950.00 _ - s -
Bond Admin /Disc Costs Hs Bonds 20% TI Bank of New York/Willdan Costs to administer the housin• bonds 36,800.00 4.600.00 4,600.00 $ 4,6
16) Bond Proceeds Tax Alloc Bonds Bonds Successor Agency Required b bondholders for .roects 6,622,080.12 0.00 $ -
Bond Proceeds Hsg Rev Bonds Bonds Successor Housing Agcy Required by bondholders for projects 1 2,341,16 &g1 0.00 $ -
Oyster Point Ventures DDA 80% TI Oyster Pt Ventures. LLC Section 3.4.1 of DDA- infrastr. required 29,463,230.00 29,463,230.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 29,443,230.00 $ 29,463,230.00
Secs. 4.5 closg /escrow; 5.2 environ
Oyster Point Ventures DDA 80% TI Various contractors /staff indemnification; 5.3 methane monitorin. 20,100,000.00 0.00 $ -
It O ster Point Ventures DDA 80% TI Legal /Staff costs Soft project management costs 2,407,847.00 129,892.00 9,407.67 12,407.67 12,407,67 12,407.67 12,407.67 ( 14,407.67 $ 73,446.02
gli Harbor District Ag reement 80% TI Harbor District Secs. 6.1 im.rvmts, 9 cost reimbrsmt. 2,635,000.00 2,635,000.00 35,000.00 1 2,600,000.00 $ 2,635,000.00
Bli Harbor District Agreement 80% TI Harbor District Secs. 5.0 lease rev, 7.0 temp. office 1,793,248.00 0.00 $ -
Harbor District A•reement 80% TI Leal /Staff costs Soft project management costs 1,133,914.00 69,196.00 4,516.33 7,516.33 7,516.33 7,516.33 7,516.33 7,516.33 $ 42,097.98
II Miller Parking Structure (pf1012) 80% TI Various contractors/staff Finish project and pay retentions 570,568.71 570,568.71 4,78583 327,850.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 ; 5,213.97 $ 357,849.80
Oran•e Park Environmental (p11009) Bonds CSS Environmental Servs. Contracted project work - environmental 15,488.00 15,488.00 11,315.15 4,172.85 $ 15,488.00
26) 418 Linden Housin• Dev. pf1027 80% TI Brookwood Group Contracted proect work 159,169.63 159,169.63 12,753.50 21,391.43 21,391.43 21,391.43 21,391.43 21,391.41 $ 119,710.63
® 418 Linden Housin• Dev. 80% TI Leal /Staff costs Soft pro ect mana•ement costs 83,734.00 46,867.00 3,072.25 8,072.25 3072.25 3,072.25 3,072.25 8,072,25 $ 28,433.50
: Train Station Imprvmnts Ph 1(pf1002) Bonds TechAccutiteiWisley Ham Contracted work -site remediation 233,342.52 233,342.52 83,04882 50,097.90 50,097.90 50,097.90 $ 233,342.52
Train Station Im•rvmnts Phase 1 Bonds Staff Costs Soft .roect management costs 0.00 16,759.32 0.00 5,586.44 5,586.44 5,586.44 $ 16,759.32
30) Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Bonds Various contractors Site remediation per Cal Trans Agrmt, 800,000.00 0.00 $
31) Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Bonds Le•al!Staff costs Soft pro ect many ernent costs 152,841.93 25,000.00 ______J 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
Totals - This Page $ 204,351,882.43 $ 46,198,270.35 S4,030,96698; 52,048,619.25 $ 410,872.02 $ 120,272.02 S 59,38768 $ 35,652,061.11 $ 42,322,179.06
Totals - Page 2 $ 48,614,959.12 $ 11,265,275.62 $1,525,591 33 5 301,373.25 $ 301,373.25 51,427,758.92 5 301,373.25 $ 1,952,036.66 $ 5,809,506.66
Totals - Page 3 5 24,847,763.00 $ 5,609,961.00 $ 191,884.43 $ 191,884.43 $ 216,884.43 $ 216,884.43: $ 266,88443 $ 3,535,376.33 $ 4,619,798.48
Totals - Other Obligations - Page 4 $ 3,885,225.08 $ 3,885,225.08 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ 3,885,225.08 S 3,885,225.08
Grand total - All Pages 1$ 281,699,829.63 11$ 66,958,732.05 11 55,748,442.74 1 1 S2,541,876.93 11 $1,764,915.37 11$ 627,645.36 11 $ 45,024,699.18 11 S 56,636,709.28
•
Name of Redevelopment Agency: South San Francisco EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 4 Pages
Project Area(s) Merged
February 16, 2012 5:OOpm
RECOGNIZED OBLIGATIONS PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2012
Per AB 26 - Section 34167 and 34169
Funding Total Remaining Total Due During _ Payments by month
Project Name / Debt Obligation Source Payee Description Debt or Obligations Fiscal Year Jan Feb Mar April May June Six Month Total
32) Two Housing Replacement Units 20% TI Future Developer Replacement housing obligation 900,000.00 900,000.00 900,000.00 $ 900,000.00
33) Two Housing Replacement Units 20% TI Legal /Staff costs Soft project management costs 259,767.00 11,988.00 999.00 999.00 999.00 999.00 999.00 999.00 $ 5,994.00
34) 636 El Camino Project 20% TI Staff Costs Soft project management costs 98,312.00 49,156.00 4,096.33 4,096.33 4,096.33 4,096.33 4,096.33 4,096.33 $ 24,577.98
35) Shearwater /Bay West OPA 80% TI Staff Costs Soft project management costs 5,305,603.00 143,39500 11,949.58 11,949.58 11,949.58 11,949.58 11,949.58 11,949.58 _ $ 71,697.48
36) Gateway OPA 80% TI Staff Costs Soft project management costs 788,364.00 157,673.00 13,139.42 13,139.42 13,13942 13,139.42 13,139.42 13,139.42 $ 78,836.52
37) Affordable Housing Assets 20% TI Staff Costs Soft project management costs 7,424,435.00 344,450.00 28,704.17 28,704.17 28,704.17 28,704.17 28,704.17 28,704.17 $ 172,225.02
38) C.I.D. Housing Access 20% TI C.I.D. Housing Access Grant to non - profit 13,500.00 13,500.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250,00 2,250.00 $ 13,500.00
39) Neigh. Servs. Ctr.(NPNSC) HH 20% TI Neigh. Servs. Ctr. Grant to non - profit 20.000.00 20,000.00 3,333.33 3,333.33 3,333.33 3,333.33 3,333.33 3,333.35 $ 20,000.00
40) Reblding Together- Pen. -Natl R.Day _ 20% TI Rebuilding Together -Pen. Grant to non -profit 8,000.00 8,000.00 1,333.33 1,333.33 1,333.33 1,333.33 1,333.33 1,333.35 $ 8,000.00
41) Reblding Together- Pen. -Safe Home _ 20% TI Rebuilding Together -Pen. Grant to non- profit 15,000.00 15,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00
42) HIP Housing -Home Sharing Proq 20% TI HIP Housing Grant to non- profit 10,000.00 10,000.00 1,113.01 1,113.01 1,113.01 1,113.01 1,113.01 1,113.03 $ 6,678.08
43) Shelter Network - Crossroads 20% TI Shelter Network Grant to non- profit 18,000.00 18,000.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 $ 13,500.00
44) Shelter Network -Maple Street 20% TI Shelter Network Grant to non - profit 7,500.00 7,500.00 5,625.00 $ 5,625.00
45) Samaritan House -Safe Harbor 20% TI Samaritan House Grant to non - profit from 10 -11 1,952.41 1,952.41 325.40 325.40 325.40 325.40 325.40 325.41 $ 1,952.41
46) Samaritan House -Safe Harbor _ 20% TI Samaritan House Grant to non - profit from 11 -12 7,500.00 7,500.00 862.73 862.73 862.73 862.73 862.73 862.70 $ 5,176.35
47) Sitike Counseling Center 20% TI Sitike Counseling Center Grant to non- profit 10,300.00 10,300.00 1,287.50 1,287.50 1,287.50 1,287.50 1,287.50 1.287.50 $ 7,725.00
48) Mgmt. of grants in rows 37 -45 above 20 %TI Staff costs Soft project management costs 56,839.00 14,210.00 1,184.17 1,184,17 1,184.17 1,184.17 1,184,17 1,184.17 5 7.105.02
49) Station Area /Planning LU Program 80% TI Staff Costs Match funding for State grant (101102) 150,000.00 32,220,70 313.22 5,937.36 5,937.36 5,937.36 5,937.36 5.937.34 $ 30,000.00
50) Mid Peninsula Loan 80% TI Union Bank (for Mid Pen) Loan for affordable housing project 3,997,891.71 3,997,891.71 1,222,053.82 5 1,222,053.82
51) Buon Gusto Ristorante Loan 80% TI Ristorante Buon Gusto Inc. Loan for commercial expansion project 750,000.00 750,000.00 750.000.00 $ 750,000.00
52) Genentech Property Tax Settlement Gross TI San Mateo County Genentech property tax settlement 5,232,413.00 2,479,065.00 1.126,385.67 ) 5 1,126,385.67
53) Reserve for Existing Claims 80% TI Claimants Reserves for costs for existing Mitigation 7,300,000.00 100,000.00 12,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20.000.00 8,000.00 f 5 100,000.00
54) Audit Services 80 %71 Maze & Associates Annual auditing requirements 555,000.00 28,000.00 2,333.33 i 2,333.33 2,333.33 2,333.33 , 2,333.35 $ 14,000.00
55) Financial Analyses -RDA Dissolution 80% TI Seifel Consulting Update passthrough modellmisc analyses 10,000.00 10,000.00 1,666.67 1,666.67 1,666.67 1,666.67 , 1,666.67 1,666.65 $ 10,000.00
56) Local Tax Compliance /Rptg. Services 80 %TI Muni Financial Services Roll correction; Assmt AppealiOther Rpt. 27,827.00 22,826.80 10,163.40 12,663.40 $ 22,826.80
57) Loan Warehousing Services 80% TI AmeriNational Loan admin- commercial loans 6,000.00 0.00 $ -
58) Loan Warehousing Services 20% TI AmeriNational Loan admin- housing loans 111,000.00 1,500.00 250,00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 $ 1,500.00
59) Maintenance of Non -Hsg Properties 80% TI Various contractors Rehab, repair, maintenance, & utilities 4.744,092.00 160,468.00 26,744.67 26,744.67 26,744.67 26,744.67 26,744.67 26,744.65 , $ 160,468,00
60) Maintenance of Non -Hsg Properties 80% TI Legal /Staff costs Soft project management costs 3,665,270.00 1,719,324.00 143,277.00 143,277.00 143,277.00 ) 143,277.00 143,277.00 143,277.00 5 859,662.00
61) Maintenance of Housing Properties 20% TI Various contractors Rehab, repair, maintenance, & utilities 1,554,971.00_ 78,680.00 13,113.33 13,1 13.33 13,113.33 13,113.33 13,113.33 _ 13,113.35 $ 78,680.00
62) Maintenance of Housing Properties 20% TI Legal /Staff costs Soft project management costs 5,565,422.00 152,675.00 12,722.92 12,722.92 12,722.92 12,722.92 12,722.92 12,722.91 1 $ 76,337.51
$
Totals - This Page $ 48,614.959.12 511,265,275.62 $1,525,591.33 $ 301,373.25 $ 301,373.25 51.4 S 301,373.25 $1.952,036.66 $ 5,809,506.66
Name of Redevelopment Agency: South San Francisco EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 4 Pages
Project Area(s) Merged
February 16, 2012 5;00pm
RECOGNIZED OBLIGATIONS PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2012
Per AB 26 - Section 34167 and 34169
Funding Total Remaining Total Due During - - Payments by month
Project Name / Debt Obligation Source Payee Description Debt or Obli.ations Fiscal Year Jan Feb Mar April May June Six Month Total
63 Administration Costs 80% TI Various contractorsimisc Costs to administer Successor Agency 54,125.00 112,010.00 9,334.17 9,334.17 9,334.17 9,334.17 9,334.17 9,334.15 $ 56,005.00
64 Administration Costs 80% TI Le.al/Staff costs Soft pro'ect mana.ement costs 9,180,030.00 1.031,040.00 85,920.00 85,920.00 85,920.00 85,920.00 85,920.00 85,920.00 $ 515,520.00
65 Administration Costs 20% TI Various contractors /mist Costs to administer Successor A enc 243,750.00 6,500.00 541.67 541-67 541.67 541.67 541.67 541.65 $ 3,250.00
66 Administration Costs 20% TI Staff costs Soft .ro'ect mana•ement costs 2,874,424.00 75,854.00 6,321.17 6,321.17 6,321.17 6,321.17 6,321.17 6,321.15 $ 37,927.00
67 Pro•ert Disposition Costs 80% TI Various contractors Initial envir. testi ., noticin., listin. costs 2,691,100.00 186,200.00 15,516.67 15,516.67 15,516.67 15,516.67 65,516.67 65,516.65 $ 193,100.00
68 Pro•ert Disposition Costs 80% TI L•al /Staff costs Soft pro'ect mana•ement costs 2,011,149.00 868,721.00 64,060.08 64,060.08 89,060.08 89,060.08 89,060,08 89,060.08 $ 484,360.48
69 Interde•artmental Char.es 80% TI Ci of SSF Insurance, equi. maint, vehicle chr.s 3,368,850.00 45,525.00 7,587.50 7 7,587.50 7,587.50 7,587.50 7,587.50 $ 45,525.00
70 Interdepartmental Char.es 0% TI Ci of SSF Insurance, e•ui• maint, vehicle chr.s 1,155,843.00 15,619.00 2,603.17 2,603.17 2,603.17 2,603.17 2,603.17 2,603.15 $ 15,619.00
71 Accrued PERS Pension Obli•ations 80% TI PERS Costs accrued to date 875,712.00 875,712.00 875,712.00 $ 875,712.00
72 Accrued Retiree Health Obli•ations 80% TI Kaiser /Blue Shield Costs accrued to date 2,392,780.00 2,392,780.00 2,392,780.00 $ 2,392,780.00
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
n $
$ -
$
$
$
$ -
$ -
Note 1' Staff costs include payroll, benefits, and retirement costs $
Totals - This Page $ 24,847,763.00 $ 5,609,961.00 $ 191,884.43 $ 191,884.43 '. $ 216.884.43 $ 216,884.43 $ 266,884.43 $3,535,376.33 $ 4,619,798.48
Name of Redevelopment Agency: South San Francisco EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 4 Pages
Project Area(s) Merged
February 16, 2012 5:00prn
OTHER OBLIGATIONS PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2012
Per AB 26 - Section 34167 and 34169
Fundin Total Remaining Total Due During _ Payments by month
Project Name / Debt Obligation Source Payee Description Debt or Obligations Fiscal Year Jan Feb Mar April May June Six Month Total
1) Basic Aid Section 33676 Pymt 80% TI SMC Comm College Dist Pass through payment 106,065.30 106,065.30 106,065.30 $ 106,065.30
2) Contractual Section 33401 Pymt 80% TI San Mateo County Pass through payment 2,800,114.48 2,800,114.48 2,800,114.48 $ 2,800,114.48
3) Contractual Section 33401 Pymt 80% TI SSF Unified SD Pass through payment 446,515.17 446,515.17 446,515.17 $ 446,515.17
4) Contractual Section 33401 Pymt 80% TI SMC Comm College Dist Pass through payment 99,819.87 99,819.87 99,819.87 $ 99,819.87
5) Contractual Section 33401 Pymt 80% TI SMC Board /Office of Ed Pass through payment 33,973.74 33,973.74 _ 33,973.74 $ 33,973.74
6) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI San Mateo County Pass through payment 92,669.22 92,669.22 92,669.22 $ 92,669.22
7) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI City of SSF Pass through payment 94,607.77 94,607.77 94,607.77 $ 94,607.77
8) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI SSF Unified SD Pass through payment 157,862.43 157,862.43 157,862.43 $ 157,862.43
9) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI SMC Comm College Dist Pass through payment 13,921.07 13,921.07 13,921.07 $ 13,921.07
10) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt , 80% TI ,BA Air Quality Mgmt Pass through payment 1,269,59 1,269.59 1,269.59 $ 1,269.59
11) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI SMC Harbor District Pass through payment 2,141.73 2,141.73 2,14113 $ 2,141.73
12) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI All Zones CC Flood Contr Pass through payment 11,900.64 11 11,900.64 $ 11,900.64
13) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI Wiliow Gardens Pass through payment 2,923.34 2.923.34 2,923.34 f $ 2,923.34
14) Statutory Section 33607 Pymt 80% TI SMC Board /Office of Ed Pass through payment 21,440.73 21,440.73 21,440.73 $ 21,440.73
$ -
Note This represents the current estimate for what the Successor Agency owes on pass - through payments for the tax increment received the first half of fiscal year 2011/12. All future passthrough payments will be the responsibility of San Mateo County. $
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
•
Totals - Other Obli• ations $ 3.885,225.08 $ 3,885,225.08 $ $ - $ _ - � $ - I s - 1 9 3,885,225.08 1 $ 3,885,225.08
•