Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 89-1974 RE SO LUTI ON' NO. 89-74 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED REMEDIAL WORK AT OYSTER POINT MARINA LANDF ILL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South san Francisco, California, that the Council having received the Report of the Director of Public Services regard- ing certain proposed remedial work at the Oyster Point Marina Landfill, does hereby approve said Report and orders the implementation thereof, said Report being attached hereto as Exhibit "A". :'¢ :% ~'¢ I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a held~on the 6th day of May following vote: requ[ar meeting , 1974, by the AYES, COUNCILMEN Richard A. Batta.qlia, F. Frank Mammini. Terry J, Mirri, Leo Padreddi i, and Warren Steinkamp NOES, " None AB SENT, " None EXHIBIT "A" May 6, 1974 TO: Honorable City Cau~cil SUBJECT: OYSTER POINT MARINA LANDFILL - REMEDIAL WORK FROM: Administrative Staff RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the schedule of remedial work. described in the attached to meet the require- ments of the Regional.Water Quality Control Board. DISCUSSION: The City and South San Francisco'Scavenger Company have performed substan- tial work at the site, included but not limited to the following: removal of 50,000 cubic yards more or less from the southeast area; grading of the site; grading of the slope; rip-rap of the slope; stock pile of. impervious material; and periodic inspections (visual and chemical] --- In addition the City has undertaken a program to regenerate the salt marshes through Dr. Joel F. Gustafson which provides for the planting of pickleweed-and cordgrass along the perimiter of the slope. The purpose of the pickleweed and cordgrass plantings and other plantings is for the control of erosion. The Water Quality Control Board staff has called to the City's attention five items for further corrective action, as shown on the plat attached hereto as Attachment "1". City's staff has prepared a schedule to 'accomplish the work, as set forth ...... - ~ Att~h.ment "2". 'Item No. 1 is the larger item of work, and the City's staff has obtained from Harlan COnsulting Civil Engineers a proposal for soil engineering services, Attachment "3". The Director of the Department of.Public Services and the City Engineer are scheduled to meet with the staff of the Water Quality Control Board in the Attorney General's Office on Tuesday, May 7, 1974, to discuss the action program. The adoption of a resolution approving this report and Ordering its imple- mentation will assure the Water Quality Control Board and the Attorney General's Office of a firm schedule for the proposed remedial work. TO: Honorable City CounCil 5/6/74 SUBJECT: Oyster Point Marina Landfill - Remedial Work The staff is prepared to discuss this matter and answer any questions the City Council may have at the'meeting to be held on May 6~ 1974. Edward G. Alar~io City Manager -- .~ . _ :!!,,,: ' , , ~ ."'. Frank J. Addiego Director of Public Services FJA/ep Attch. City of So. S.F. mi I OYSTER POINT MARINA LANDFILL ¢ORRECTi VIi ACTIONS N 7ASKS 1' 2* 4* CITY OF $OIIT~ SAN FRANCISCO OYSTER PO' ]ARINA LANDFILL CORRECTIVE ACTION ~Authorization to Soils Engineer for Soil Tests i Met w/!CRWQCB staff ~ ~Review actions BY' CITY ENGINEE~ ...... ]6. 197.4 w/CRWQCBi stari- ii il , Monthly joint field ~inspecticns with CRWQCB staff t~ monitor i addztzonal correct!zve ~easures June Jul. Aug. 15 1 1S 1 1S ~ 1S ~7.~ield Tests Vest Reports ~ ~Review W/C.R.W'QiC.B. Sta~ ~ ~ i ~ p~pare Plans ~ Specs. ~ [~i I Hill low ~rea ~To City C~uncil for approval to soAiCi 'l With impe~iou~ ~ .... i --~ I [ [' ' [ ~..~ I ' ~ Out to ~Bid ' ~Fili [low Cpot; and:regrade~ ~ ~id 6peni~g ~~as to elimfnateJpdnd~i~ ~ ~ ' j All work 'to b.. done by.czty: forces ~ - , ~- .~ '. ~ ~ ..... . ~ ~ w~th' So~%s Engineers s'~perwsio~ ~ ~Cor.tract. I~surance ~onas ; ,Noti e t~ ProCeed iprog~ess .and reco. mended Sept. Oct. 1 1S 1 (Inspection bM CRWQCB) : · i ~hsy Nov. fEAR 1974 1 15 1 *TheSe corrective items are as stated on Page $ of 5 "Checking Program Report" by California Regional Water Quality Control Board dated 5~rch 1, 1974 1. Abate discharge of sulfide bearing water along shoreline in area near entrance to municipal yacht harbor. 2. Removal of organic deposits below high water mark at southeasterly corner. 5. Abate all evidence of seepage from fill faces along the southerly dump face and around the southerly side of the parking area of the yacht harbor. 4. Repair of drainage facilities to eliminate ponding along the south side of the parking area of the yacht harbor. 5. Regrade the top of the fill to eliminate ponding and. thus percolation and seepage potential. **~orrec~ive action to be taken at these locations will be as follows: (1) Removal of organic material. (2) Fill void with ~mperwous material. (3) Place Rip Rap for erosion control. All work to be done in accordance with Soil Engineers direction. ATTACHmeNT "2" ~ -- , ..- · ATTACHMENT "8" Harlan CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINF. ERS 'AND ENGINEF. RING GEOLOGISTS ENGINEIiRS Suite 812 Hobart Building · 582 Market Street · San Francisco, California 94104 · (415) 986-8484 File No. H3-0406-F2 May 3, 1974 Mr. Robert Yee City Engineer City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, California 94080 Subject: Oyster Foint Landfill South San Francisco, Ca].ifornia PROPOSAL FOR SOIL ENGINEERING SERVICES Dear Mr. Yee: .This letter confirms our discussions relative to a soil engineer- ing investigation of some areas of erosion and leaching at the Ouster Point Sanitary l,andfill We have reviewed the Re~iona~ Water QUality Control Boards Checking Program Report. dated i March 1974 by b~r. W. R. Macke. The main area of investigation is the finger of fill jutting northward just eastof the Marina, Corrective Action Item I of Mr. Hackers report. The difficulties with this fill are discussed in our letter of March 1, 1974 file number H4-0406-F1. W~ propose to investigate the perimeter of this fill by a series of backhoe trenches after flattening the debris piles with a dozer. Our engineer supervising the field exploration will log the borings and take samples of the materials encountered as necessary. Soil tests will be performed on the samples in our laboratory only if deemed necessary on the basis of the conditions encountered in the field. Our recommendations for correction of the leaching an~ erosion will be presented in a formal report along with the field -and laboratory data. We will also inspect and provid~ recommendations relative to' Correc- tive Action Items 2 through 5 of bk. Macke's report. When the proper construction relative to Corrective Action Item 1 has been determined, and you have requested us to proceed, we will prepare plans .and special provisions of specifications for the work. We will complete the investigation report by May 31, 1974, 1974 We if we receive verbal authorization to proceed by May 8,- . propose to carry out these items of work on the basis of our Stan- dard Schedule of Fees attached. We estimate that our fees for the investigation re~ort will bo -' t $2, _ ~ . ~ aoou 050 and ~?,at our fees fo~ preparing the plans aad special provisions of the specifications will be about o7~0. SOIL AND ROCK MECItANICS · FOUNDATIONS · EARTH DAMS · DEEP EXCAVATIONS File No. H3-0406-F2 May 3, 1974 These estimates do not include any inspection or direction of construction or testing and observation of grading which may be required during construction. We will proceed on the basis of your verbal authorization to be confirmed by purchase order. Sincerely, HARLAN ENGINEERS . ..... ( /' i..-. . Richard C. Harlan Encl Fee Schedule · I:,NG'IN!!I~I~.S' CONSIII.'i'IN(; ¢;IVll. I!N(ilNI~I!I,I.S ANI) !!N(ilNlii!i{IN(i G!!OI.O(iISTS Suite 812 llobart Building · 582 blark(..t Slrcct · San Francisco, California 9410.t · (41.5) 986.8.184 FEE .SCtlEDULE The following schedule presents typical rates for professional services. If desired, services other than construCtion observation and testing can be con- tracted on a negotiated fixed fee basis. These rates are in effect through February 1975. Hours and mileage for professional and technical services are Charged portal-to-portal <rom the nearest Harlan. Engineers' office. Services during Construction such as testing and' observation of grading require both professional and tcctinical services. Depending on the scope and duration of the construction project, budgets can be quoted. Hinimum fee for any project is $4oo.oo'. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Engineer or Geologist SeniOr Engineer or Geologist Supervising Engineer or Geologist Chief Engineer or Geologist Principal $25.00 per hr. $30.00 per hr. $35.00 per hr. $40.00 per hr. $50.00 per hr. Deposition, llearing and Court Appearance $300.00 per half day., minimum. Preparation and Consultation at applicable hourly rates. TECIINICAL SERVICES . Drafting Field Technician - including Nuclear Density Testing: Straight Time Overt i'me Double Time Per Diem when applicable $18.00 per hr. $22.00 per hr. $31.00 per hr. $40.00 per hr. $28.00 per day Field Technicians are billed at 2, 4, and 8 hours increments'. MILEAGE AND INCIDE:TFAL, EXPI'X';SES Aut° Mileage $ .20 per mi. Drill Rig Hilengc beyond 50 mi. from yard $ .50 per mi. Incidental expenses, such as consultants' fee, subcontract servicv.:;, equipment rental, aerial photographs, out-of-to~m travel, etc., are reimbursable at cost, plus 15%. January 1974 SOIL AND ROC'K MECHANICS · FOUNDATIONS · EARTIi DAMS · DEEP EXCAVATIONS ,D. RILL[NG AND S;~q" '"" Drilling Kig including crew - truck-mortared or portable: Strai§ht 'rime Overtime ~ · Double Time Dril[in§ Rig includin§ crew - crawler-mounted: Mobilization Straight Time Ore r time Double Time $60.0'0 per hr. $75.00 per hr. $90.00 per hr. $50.00 each . $75.00 per hr. $90.00 per hr. $105.00 per hr. Drilling is charged at 4 hours minimum and '8 hoUrs 'if greater than 4 but less than 8 hours. ~'i~e is chargad portal t~o portal from yard. Casing, Shelby tubes and any special s.~m~pling or subc,)ntrac~ equipmen~ 15,o-' will be charged at cost, plus v FIELD TESTS Plate bearing lead tests, pile load tests, vane shear tests, piezometer installations, slope indicator installations, and other special tests will be chmrged at standard engineering and pdrsonnel rates, plus cost of spec iai" 'equipment. LABORATORY TESTS · Sample Preparation Sieve Analysis, pit run with 200 wash, ~IM D-422 Short Hydrometer Analysis (without Sp. Gr.), AS'R.! D-422 Specific Gravity (Sand and Gravel), ASI%[ D-854 Specific Gravity. (Clay), ASTH D-854 Moisture Detcrminati~ and/or Unit Weight, ASTM D-2216 Atterberg Limits: a. Plasticity Index, ASTH D-424 Unconftnad Co'ni>r~,sslcu, ASTii 0-2166 Swell Test, ItUD (FUA)' Procedure Direct Shaar (quick), per point Consolidntion, per load increment, ASI21 D-2435 'R-Value, ASTM D-2844 z R-Value, re,neet, lime or other additives,' ASTM D-2844 Compaction Curves' a. b. C. d. e. Standard, ASTH D-698 Mod£fie:l, 4" Mold, ~%ST."!' D-[557 Modi£ied, 6" bloLd, AS'I'M 0-1557 Impact, Califo~i.a State llighwaTs I Pt. Verification TriaXial and other special testing at hourly rates or individua $20.00 per hr. $25.00 per test $30.00 $25.00 $35.oo $ 9.00 $5o.0o · ~40.00 $25.00 $75.00 $22.50 $22.50 $90.o0 St00,00 $70.00 $ 70.o0 $~o.oo $70.00 $35.o0 lly quoted. INVOICES , Invoices will be submLtt~d at thc comoletion o£ work Or at appro:,,i~:ately two-week intervals, invoices are payable upon presentation. Inw~ices 30 days past due will be s,.:bject to a :;crvice charge of ene percent per 4-week interval. Statements will be sent at.4-weck intervals.