HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 24-1977RESOLUTION NO. 24-77
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED GUIDELINES
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRON-
MENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 AND THE
CALIFORNIA STATE GUIDELINES AS AMENDED
AND ISSUED BY THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS' the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended
by the Resources Agency of California, requires local agencies to
adopt procedures for implementation of the Act, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by its Resolution No. 2201,
adopted January 25, 1977, entitled "Resolution of the City of South
San Francisco.Planning Commission Establishing an Environmental
Review Process for Development Projects and Municipal Projects in
Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and
Pertinent Guidelines Issued by the Resources Agency of the State of
California," recommended an amendment of said guidelines contained
in a document entitled "City of South San Francisco Environmental
Review Process," and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after public hearing duly noticed,
desires to adopt said revised Environmental Impact Report Guidelines;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of South San Francisco that:
1. Resolution No. 33-74, adopted the 19th day of February, 1974,
entitled "A Resolution Establishing a Precise Plan for the Processing
of Developmental Projects and Municipal Plats in Accordance with the
Environmental Quality Act, and the Appurtenant Guidelines issued by
the Resources Agency," is hereby rescinded.
2. The City of South San Francisco Environmental Review Process
contained in the document by that title, attached hereto as Attachment
·
1' which contains the Environmental Impact Report Guidelines for the
City of South San Francisco, is hereby adopted.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly
introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco at an adjourned reqular meeting held on the
23rd day of February , 1977 , by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN Richard A. Battaglia, William A. Borba, Terry J.
Mirri and Leo Padreddii
NOES, " None
ABSENT, " Emanuele N. Damonte
·
,
_Page .No.
V,
FEES
A. Fee Structure
1. Ministerial/Emergency Projects
2. Categorical Exemptions
3. Negative Declarations
4. Draft EIR
5. Appeal of City Planning Commission Action
B. Additional Costs
10
VI. APPENDIX
A. Exhibit "A" - Categorical Exemption Analysis
B. Exhibit "B" - Environmental Analysis Form
C. Exhibit "C" - Processing Flow Chart
ll
February, 1977
Prepared by Planning Division
ERP-2/77
Il I ['
fillii ~ Ill'] I11 I
City of South San Francisco
Environmental P, eview ProCess
I. PREFACE
A'. State of California - Legislative Declaration-
.
-
The Legislature has declared that: (a) Every citizen has a respon-
sibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the
environment. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that all
agencies of the state government which regulate activities of private
individuals, corporations and public agencies which are found to
affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities
so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage.
(Section 15010)*
B. CEQA EIR Requirement
The California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, requires all
local agencies to prepare or cause to be prepared environmental impact
reports on any projects which may have a significant effect on the
environment. Significant effect, as defined by CEQA guidelines, means
a substantial adverse impact on the environment.
C. Purpose of the city of South ,Sa,n Francis.co, Environmental Review Process
These guidelines are to provide procedures and policies to determ, ine
environmental impacts and, for the review, findings and certification
of these environmental documents.
D. The EIR as an Informational Tool
- ~
An Environmental Impact Report is an informational document'which, when
fully prepared in accordance with the CEQA and these'Guidelines, will.
inform public decision-makers and the general public of the environ-
mental effects of projects they propose to carry out or approve. The
EIR process is intended to enable public agencies to evaluate a. project
to determine whether it may have significant effect on the environment,
to examine and institute methods of reduCing adverse impacts, and to
consider.alternatives to the project as proposed. This analysis must
be done prior to approval or disapproval of the project. An EIR may
not be used as an instrument to rationalize approval of a project, nor
do indications of adverse impact, as enunciated in an EIR, require that
a project be disapproved. While CEQA requires that major consideration
be given to preventing environmental damage, it is recognized that
public agencies have obligations to balance other public objectives,
including economic and social factors in determining whether and how
a project should be approved: Economic information may be included
in an EIR or may be presented in whatever form. the agency desires.
(Section 15012)
-
*NOTE: All section references are to the "Guidelines for Implementation,
California Environmental Quality Act," Title 14, California
Administrative Code, enacted pursuant to Pub Res Code~21 000 et s~
ERP-2/77
II]11 Il ' lillFI III I!
·
II1: I Ir'
E State of California Resou'rce Ag_enc~v_ Guidelin_es
The "-Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970," Title 14, California Administrative Code
15006-15155 and the appendices thereto, are hereby incorporated
by reference for the purpose of executing the environmental impact
process.
Wherever conflicts exist between these Guidelines and the State
Guidelines, the State Guidelines shall prevail.
ERP-2/77
2,
II. RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Office of the City Planner
The City Planner shall make the initial determination of environmental
impacts upon review of the information submitted. The City Planner
shall follow the procedures and policies defined in this document.
B. City Planning Commission
When the Commission is the decision-making authority, this Commission
shall hold public hearings and review environmental documents in
accordance with the CEQA and these Guidelines. On projects on which
the Commission is the decision-making authority, review of the action
on the environmental document is final unless appealed to the City
Council in which case the environmental review by the Planning Com-
mission shall be considered a recommendation to the City Council
and the City Council shall then review the environmental document
and make its own determination according to the procedures set forth
in these Guidelines.
On projects in which the Commission reviews proposals and makes
recommendations to the City Council, pursuant to the South San Fran-
cisco City Code, the Commission shall also review environmental
documents for these projects and make recommendation thereon. 'No
action on the project itself shall be.taken until Council review of.
environmental analysis is complete. The Commission shall follow
procedures and policies herein defined in this document.
C. City council
When the' City Council is the decision-making authority on proposed
projects or in the case of an appeal of a City Planning Commission
action on an environmental document, upon receipt of the recommendation
of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall review and consider
environmental documents in accordance with CEQA.
D. project Applicant
The applicant shall be responsible for providing all information re-
quested by the city or its consultants. The applicant shall be
responsible for compliance with those provisions of this document
which require direct action on the applicant's part.
ERP-2/77
e
II I ['
E. ?t..'blic Review/Public Hearin.qs
Public review of environmental documents is encouraged and to
facilitate the opportunity for persons to comment, the public
review process shall be utilized for review of certain environ-
mental documents (Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact
Report), as specified in these guidelines. Public review, as
utilized throughout these guidelines, shall mean that notice shall
be placed in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (lO)
days prior to the consideration. This notification process applies
to hearings held before the Planning Commission and City Council.
ERP-2/77
4,
III. PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING EXEMPTIOHS FROM CEQA
A. Submission of In'Formation
Any person undertaking a project shall be required to provide sufficient
data on either the required city form or for categorical exemptions,
completion of the Categorical Exemption Analysis Form (Exhibit "A")
for determination of environmental impacts as defined in CEQA.
B. Categorical Analysis, Time Frame for Determination, Posting
and Notification Process
1. Ministerial/Emergency Projects
(a) Analysis
All projects of the following categories
are exempt in conformance to Section 15073
(1) Issuance of building permits
(2) Issuance of business licenses
(3) Approval of final subdivision maps
(4) Approval of individual utility
service connections and disconnections
(b) Time Frame for Determination
'These projects as defined in CEQA are exempt
from the requirements of CEQA and no environ-
mental documents are required (Sec. 15073)
2. _Categorical Exemption
If the City Planner determines that a project is not minis-
terial or emergency, a determination shall be made by the
City Planner as to whether the project is' included within
any of the activities of categorical exemption.
(a) .Anal~/si s
All projects shall be reviewed to determine
if they are included within the related
activities of the categorical exemptions
listed in CEQA Guidelines. (Sec. 15100).
The City of South San Francisco finds that
there are no other classes or examples other
than those listed.
(b) Time Frame for Determination
'The City Planner shall make a determination
of categorical exemption within ten days
upon receipt of the Categorical Exemption
Analysis Form (Exhibit "A").
ERP-2/77
5,
(c) Postinq
Upon determination of categoriCal exemption,
the City Planner shall post this request for
an exemption in city hall for a period of
ten days. The ten days shall commence as of
the date of posting excluding the first day
and including the last day. The determination
of exemption shall be .final at the end of the
posting period.
(d) Notice of Exemption
Upon the approval of the project, the City
Planner shall cause a Notice of Exemption to
be filed with the County Clerk in accordance
with CEQA (Sec. 15074).
Ge
ERP-2/77
IV. PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING NON-EXENPT PROJECTS
·
A. Submission of Information
.
Any person undertaking a project shall be required to provide sufficient
data on the Environmental Analysis Form (Exhibit "'B") for determination
of environmental impacts as defined in CEQA.
B. Initial Study
If a project is not ministerially or categorically exempt, then an initial
study shall be performed by the City Planner to determine the environmental
impacts in accordance with CEQA (Sec. 15080). The determination of
significant adverse impacts and mandatory findings of significance
shall be consistent with CEQA. (Sec. 15081 and 15082).
C. Categorical Analysis, Time Frame for Determination, Public
Review/Public Hearing and Notice of Determination
l. Negative Declarations
(a) Analysis
If the project is determined to not haVe a significant
adverse impact upon the environment, as a result of
the initial study, then a negative declaration shall
be prepared in accordance with CEQA. (Sec 15085)
· ,
(b) Time Frame for Determination
D~termination of the significance of the project
shall be based upon the criteria of CEQA and
shall be made by the City Planner within ten days
after submission of the information required on the
Environmental Analysis Form (Exhibit "B").
(c) Public Review/Public Hearings
Upon determination of impacts, the City Planner
shall schedule the Negative Declaration for
review and consideration by the City Planning
Commission. Copies of the Negative Declaration
and initial study shall be posted in city hall
and other copies shall be distributed as required
by law and deemed appropriate by the City Planner.
If required according to the responsibilities
specified for the City Council in these guidelines,
a subsequent review and consideration of the
environmental document shall be scheduled for the
City Council by the City Clerk. At the conclusion
of the review, the appropriate reviewing body, as
defined herein (Section II) shall find that either
(a) that the project will not have a significant
e
ERP-2/77
IIITI im ' l[ll'l ~1 I!
adverse impact on the environment and that an
E,I.R. is not required or (b) that the project
will have a significant adverse impact on the
environment and a draft E.I.R. is required.
(d) Aj~p,eal
On environmental documents in w. hich the Commis-
sion takes action, the applicant or any intereste~t
party not satisfied with the action of the City
Planning Commission may within ten (10) days appeal
to the City Council in writing, setting forth
specifics of the appeal, The City Council shall
review and consider the appeal in accordance with
the requirements specified in these Guidelines.
(e) Notice of Determination
Upon the determination of 'approval or disapproval
of the project, a Notice of Determination shall be
filed with the County Clerk in accordance with CEQA
(Sec. 15085.h),
2. Draft Environmental Impact Reports
(a) Analysis
If the project is determined to have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment, as a result
of the initial study, then a draft E.I.R, shall be
prepared in accordance with CEQA (Sec. 15085.a).
(b) Time Frame for Determination
Determination of the significance of the project
shall be based upon the criteria of CEQA and
shall be made by the City Planner within ten
days after the submission of the information
required on the Environmental Analysis Form
(Exhibit "B").
(c) Preparation of the Draft E.I.R.
The City of South Sari Francisco as the lead agency
for projects under its control, shall have prime
responsibility for the prepara.tion of all envir-
onmental impact reports. The draft E.I.R. contents
shall conform to'CEQA (sec. 15140) and these
Guidelines.
The draft E,I.R. shall reflect the independent
judgment of the City of South San Francisco prior
to its release into circulation.
(d) Notice of Completion
Upon completion of the draft E.I.R., the City
Planner shall file a Notice of Completion with
the Secretary for Resources in conformance to
CEQA (Sec. 15085.c).
EP,?-2/77
fl]il II ' Il]ii
¸8.
,,
(e) Circulation of Draft
Public Review/Public Hearings
Upon' comp'le'tion of t~e draft E.I.R., the City
Planner shall schedule the E.I.R. for public
hearing before the City Planning Commission.
The hearing shall not be s~heduled prior to a
minimum public review period of 30 days. The
draft E.I.R. shall be subject to review by the
public and all agencies having jurisdiction by
law. Copies of the E.I.R. shall be placed in
city hall and the public library and other
copies shall be distributed as required by law
and deemed appropriate by the City Planner.
(f) Appeal
On environmental documents in which the City
Planning Commission takes action, the applicant
or any interested party not satisfied with the
action of the City Planning Commission, may within
ten (10) days appeal to the City Council in writing,
setting fdrth speCifics of such an appeal. The
City Council shall hold a public hearing in accor-
dance with the requirements specified in these
Guidelines.
(g) Notice of Determination
Up'on the approval or-disapproval of the project, a
Notice of Determination shall be filed in accordance
wi th CEQA. (Sec. 15085.d).
ERP-2/77
Il]Il I! i~l'l 111 I!
'V. FEES
A. Fee Structure
The following fee structure is .established for projects undertaken
by non-governmental persons:
1. Ministerial/Emergency Projects:
No Fee
2. Categorical Exemptions:
To be paid at the time of determination
to the City Planner
$ 15.00
Negative Declaration:
To be paid at the time of determination
of initial study to the City Planner
$ 25.00
4. Draft EIR:
To be paid at the time of determination
of initial study to the City Planner
$200. O0
5. Appeals of City Planning Commission Action:
Negative Declaration, Draft EIR: -
to be paid at the time of filing written
appeal notice
No Fee
B. Additional Costs
--
In the event the minimum fees do not meet the full costs of analysis
or preparation of environmental documents, the applicant shall pay
the additional costs upon submission of city invoice before any further
action of the city or its contractors will proceed.
ERP-2/77
frill il
10.
Vi.
APPENDIX
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "E~"
Exhibit "C"
Categorical Exemption Analysis
Environnlental Analysis Form
Processing Flow Chart
ll.
ERP-2/77
. ,
E XH I B IT "A"
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAHCISCO
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ANALYSIS
---General Information (To be completed by Applicant);
I. Address of Project (Street Address and Legal Descrip.tion
-(Date Filed)
2. Name, Address & Phone Number of Applicant or Project Sponsor
3. Name, Address & Phone Number of Person to Contact Concerning Project
4. Describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state, and federal agencies.
5. Existing Zoning on Site'
6. Present Use of Site:
7. Proposed Use of Site'
-_
8. General Description of Proposed Project Action'
9. Please answer the following questions. If any questions answered yes, please explain
and describe the activity in detail, including explanation of the size and scale
of the project.
a. Does the project involve repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of
existing facilities? Yes No
·
b. Does the project involve replacement or reconstruction o~ existing
facilities? Yes No
·
c. 'Does the project-involve new constru'ction of a small s~t'ructure? ' Yes
IIIll !! ~ I]Tl Iii I!
d. Does the project involve construction of an accessory facility to
an existing use? Yes No
e. Does the project involve minor alterations of th*e land? Yes
f. Do-es the project' involve alterations of 'land use limitati-ons?
Yes No
OTHER EXPLANATIONS:
Review and Determination (To be completed by the City Planner)
~elated Permit Numbers
vi ew
-I. Is project consistent with General Plan? Yes No
2. Is project location within Geologic Hazard Special Study Zone? Yes
3. Is project location within Airport Noise Impact Zone? Yes No
4. Is project location within Flood Hazard Area? Yes No_
5. Is project location in a particularly sensitive environment? Yes
Determination
6, Is the project categorically exempt under CEQA? Yes No
If yes, specify type and section number
If no, specify next course of action
No
No
Date of Determination and Posting'.
Name/Title Person Making Determination'
II]~i I! l!!]llII1 Ii
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
ENVIRONMENTAL A~;ALYSIS FORM
The Environmental Analysis Form is to be used for the initial evaluation of all
JQ-~ojects not included within the lists of ministerial projects and categorically
~empt projects for South San Francisco.
~ne project applicant shall complete the form and return'it to the City planner.
Upon receipt of the completed Environmental Analysis Form, the City Planner shall
determine if the project may.have, or could not have, a significant effect on the
environment.
Based on the determination from the initial study, the applicant shall be advised
of whether a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report is required.
Environmental analysis d~termination and complet~ion of environmental review
pursuant to South San Francisco's Environment_a] Revie? ProFess i.s~ re_q~ired prio~r
to proceedin~ with any project_. ~
General Information (to be completed by applicant)'
(Date. Filed)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Address of Project'
Assessor's Block and Lot Number:
· 2. Name and address of developer or project sponsor'
~, ,,
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning
this project'_
List and describe any other related permits and other public approYals
required for this project, including those required by city, regional,
state and federal agencies: ~
5. Existing zoning district'
6. Present use of site-
7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed)'
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (attached additional sheets as necessary)
~' - 8. Site size.
9. Square footage.
[[111 I] lllil Iii l!
lO. Number of floors of construction.
il. Amount of off-street parking provided.
12. Attach plans.
13. Proposed scheduling.
14. Associated projects.
15. Anticipated incremental development.
16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit-sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household and household
size expected.
17. If Commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or region-
ally oriented, square footage of sales area, loading facilities.
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
19.
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment
per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community
benefits to be derived from the project.
20. If the project involves a variance, use permit, or rezoning applica-
tion, state this and indicate clearly ~hy the application is required.
Are' the following items applicable to the project or its effects?- Discuss below all
items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
EARTH
21. Change in topography or change in existing features of any bays,
tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of
ground contours.
22. Destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or
physical features.
23. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site.
24. Site on filled land or on slope of lO percent or more.
AIR qUALITY
25. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality.
26. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
[[~1 Il
Env~iron.mental Analysis Form (Page Three)
YES ~0
WATER
27. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream, or ground water quality or quantity,
or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
PLANT Ar;D ANIMAL LIFE
28. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of
plants or wildlife.
NOISE
29. Change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
ENERGY
30. Increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
LAND USE
31. Change in pattern, scale or character of general a.rea of project.
32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
TRANSPORTATION
33. Generation of additional vehicular movement and/or alteration of
existing patterns of circulation.
SAFETY
34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic
substances, flammables or explosives.
POPULATION
--
35. Change in distribution and density of population.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
·
36. Change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage,
schools, etc.).
37. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
- __
HEALTH
-
38. Create any health hazard or potential health hazard.
AESTHETICS
.
39. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or
public lands or roads.
ENVIRO~MENTAL SETTIHG
· .
40. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any
cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures
on the site, and the use of the structures.
II111 ii ' 1111'I 11111
Environmental Analysis Form (Page Four)
41. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants
and animals a~nd any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate
the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of
land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.).
IV.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached
exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evalua-
tion to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
( Da te · '(Si gna ture)
For
I
City of Sou-tl~ San Francisco
Environmental Review Process
"Process Flow Chart"
EXHIBIT "C"
Applica-~ion for a permit,
license, etc.
Ci ty~ Pl'anner
~Lnv~ronmental Determination
1. Ministerial/Emergency,
2, Categorically Exempt
3, Not Exempt
cits Planner
Initial S-t u d-y
1, Negative Declaration,
2. EIR Required
Draft E,I.R.
Notice of Completion
1. -Circulate for co-mments
~.No Action Required
--~Postin~
1', City Hall
,F~_P~blic Review ·
1 Posting'
City Hall
2. Newspaper Notice
3. Notice to adjacent
property owners
FPublic Revi
'l', 'Posting'
City Hall/Library
2, Newspaper Notice
3. Notice to adjacent
property owners
-~_Notice of Exem?tion
Public Hearin~g
T~ la'nn'ing Comml-ssion
1. Finding' No EIR Required
2. Finding: EIR Required
NOTE: (See Below)
.-Public He_a, ring. i~lanni ng Commission
1. Certify final E.I.R.-
NOTE: (See Below)
F~Public Hearing
City' Couiici 1
Il. Finding'
] 2. Finding'
No EIR
EIR
A
~Public Hearing
'Cit~ Council
1, Certify E.I.R:--
~ Notice of
Determination
Required ~
Required
~, NocTce of
Determi na ti on
NOTE:
Projects requiring final approval by the
City Council by City Ordinance or by appeal
of the City Planning Commission decision on
environmental documents,
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
SU~4MARY
PLANNING CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS FOR
COMI,iUNITY PLANNING STUDIES AHD ENVIRONMENTAL Ib1PACT REPORTS
A .
I. City establishes and reviews annually a planning consultant list.
2. Consultants on the list have been evaluated according to general ability
to address a range of planning issues and according to expertise in
special areas of planning. Consultants have been selected for the
following topics: Air Quality, Biology, Circulation and Traffic, Economic
Studies, Geology, Housing, Hydrology, Land Use and Zoning, Noise, Parks
and Open Space, and Urban Design. Based on project issues and research
and evaluation needs, consultants listed under the pertinent planning
topi. c will be selected on a project by project basis.
3. Preliminary plans for the project are reviewed by the city.
4. City determines major areas of project interest, concern and impact based
on preliminary data.
5. City'develops major objectives of study to be done and outlines the
general scope of work.
6. Based on major project areas of concern, consultants on the established
consultant list under the appropriate planning topic or topics, will be
contacted.
7. City Staff, project representatives, and all potential consultants meet
to discuss project and review scope of work required by city.
8. Based on information received on the project and scope of work, interested
consultants submit proposals to the city to do work.
9. City staff reviews proposals to determine if the proposal is comprehensive,
complete, and consistent with the intent and scope of work outlined by City.
10. If the proposed study is for a community planning project or an environmental
impact report for a public project, the City shall select the consultant or
consultants based on proposed approach to work assignment and economic and
time factors suitable to the city's needs.
If the proposed study is for an environmental impact report for a. private
project or some other type of private project, the project applicant
shall select the consultant or consultants based on proposed approach to
work assignment and economic and time factors suitable to the applicant
and consistent with the city's requirements for the study.
II]~1 I! l ii]Il II[ l!
--- I I. City engages in contract with the consultant to have the work performed.'
(In the case of private projects, the project applicant shall submit
to the city the fees necessary to cover the cost of the initial work
and any additional studies as may be required).
12. Review process for the completed study and/er project per city proce-
dures. Additional work as required by review process and determined
by the city. Work to end upon completion.
NOTE:
1. Appropriate measures will be taken to safeguard the confidentiality
of proposal s.
2. The city will reserve the right to seek proposals from other firms
in addition to those on the list when circumstances require that it
is in' the best interest of the community to do so.
[lIT! I! l lll'lfill