Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso RDA 22-1981 RESOLUTION NO. 22 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE S. NOLTE & ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO OYSTER PT. BLVD./HWY. 101 GRADE SEPARATION WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelop- ment Law (Part 1, commencing with Section 33000 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California) the City Council of the City of South San Francisco being legislative body of the City of South San Francisco, by Ordinance adopted December 17, 1979, declared that there is a need for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco to function in the City of South San Francisco and declared the City Council itself to be the Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that it will be necessary to employ engineering consultants for a feasibility study of required or possible modifi- cations to improve the Grade Separation at Oyster Pt. Blvd./Hwy 101 within the redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed an agreement among said Agency, the City of South San Francisco and George S. Nolte & Associates, which provides for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco as follows: 1. That the firm of George S. Nolte & Associates, be and is hereby retained to act as engineering consultants to the Redevelopment Agency in con- nection with the proposed Oyster Pt. Blvd./Hwy 101 Grade Separation Feasibility Study subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement attached hereto_as Exhibit "1." 2. Execution of ~he aforementioned agreement among this agency, the City of South San Francisco, and George S. Nolte & Associates providing for professional services is hereby authorized. 3. The Executive Director is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the Agency. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco on this 4th day of November , 1981. AYES: Members Ronald G. Acosta, Mark N. Addiego, Emanuele N. Damonte, Gus Nicolopulos and Roberta Cerri Teglia NOES: None ABSENT: None an, Redeve'~opment Agency of the City of South San Francisco ATTEST: Exe~c~u !i~ve ~r~)~~ 2 '-. " EXHIBIT "1 ' AGREEMENT -- This Agreement, entered into on , 1981, is by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, hereinafter called AGENCY, and GEORGE S. NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, a California corporation, hereinafter called CONSULTANT. It is mutually agreed by AGENCY and CONSULTANT as follows: SECTION 1. GENERAL This Agreement pertains to engineering services to perform a feasibility study for a grade separation of Oyster Point Boulevard over the railroad tracks of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and Highway 101 in the City; and for required or possible modifications to other existing facilities in the vicinity, includ- ing streets, ramps, utilities, related surface and subsurface structures, landscaping and other miscellaneous improvements. SECTION 2. SCOPE OF WORK The services which the CONSULTANT agrees to perform in the above phases of the project are described in the Scope of Services, attached hereto as "Exhibit A." SECTION 3.. TIME OF PERFORMANCE CONSULTANT shall begin work following execution of this Agreement upon written notice by AGENCY to proceed. ~CONSULTANT agrees to 'complete Scope of Work within six months(excluding review time by other agencies) from notice to proceed, except that CONSULTANT will not be held responsible for delay caused by others or extenua- ting circumstances beyond control of CONSULTANT. SECTION 4. COMPENSATION In consideration for services described in Exhibit A, the AGENCY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT on a time and expense basis with a maximum limit. CONSULTANT shall perform all of the services described in "Exhibit A" for a sum not to exceed $68,000, same to be computed as hereinafter set forth. Labor charges will be ac- cording to CONSULTANT'S current standard charge rates for San Jose Office personnel. Charge rates include compensation for direct labor, indirect labor overhead, general and administrative over'- head, and profit. A list of rates, effective 3uly 19, 1981, for classifications of staff, is attached as "Exhibit B." Direct expenses for in-house services of word processing and computer use will be charged at direct cost. Direct expenses for outside services such as printing, travel, equipment rental~ subcontracts, and special services will be charged at direct cost, plus 25 percent. .Mileage will be charged at $.20 per mile. The ~harge rates aha [ne maximum fee for any work remaining which bas been authorized and, due to delay caused by AGENCY, cannot reasonably be completed prior to July t, 1982 shall be subject to renegotiation. The maximum increase in compensation shall be based upon the current consumer price index, but in any event sball not exceed 11% per year for services covered by this Agreement. SECTION 5. PAYMENT The CONSULTANT shall submit invoices every four weeks for services performed and expenses incurred, and AGENCY shall make payments to CONSULTANT based upon said invoices, contingent upon approval by AGENCY as to performance of the wo'rk, and within 30 days of submittal. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIAL The AGENCY shall have full and complete access to the CONSULTANT'S design calculations, drawings, specifications, and other documents during progress of'the work; and the study reports, surveys, reports of investigations, and design drawings prepared by the CONSULTANT shall become the property of the AGENCY at the completion of the project. SECTION 7. DUTIES OF AGENCY The AGENCY agrees to make available to. the CONSULTANT all previous reports and studies pertaining to the project and all plans, reports, records, and data pertaining to the street improvements and utility systems owned by the AGENCY within.the .vicinity of the work. Whenever any item of services set forth herein is submitted to AGENCY for. approval, AGENCY shall review the item and, if satis- factory, shall approve the same. If unsatisfactory, AGENCY shall inform CONSULTANT in writing of the changes or revisions necessary to acquire AGENCY'S approval. SECTION 8. INSURANCE The CONSULTANT agrees to provide and maintain the following insurance: 1. Worker's Compensation, with Employer's Liability limits not less than $1,000,000 each accident, 2. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including Contractural Liability and Completed Operations coverages. The AGENCY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents and employees are named as .additional insured for all liabilities arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured. 3. Comprehensive AutOmobile Liability Im~nce, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including Employer's non-ownership liability and hired auto coverage. 4. Professional Liability Insurance in connection with the services performed hereunder, with limits of liability not less than $1,000,000 each claim with a deductible of not greater than $50,000. SECTION 9. ADD'ITIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT may perform additional services, or special services related to the project, other than those shown in the attached Scope of Services, if requested by the AGENCY. CONSULTANT shall not proceed with performance of such services without written notice to proceed. Compensation for any such additional or special services~will be on a time and expense basis according to the standard charge rates for labor and expenses as shown on "Exhibit B". SECTION 10 TERMINATION The AGENCY may terminate this Agreement upon 10 days written notice to the CONSULTANT in.the event of substantial failure by the CONSULTANT to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the AGENCY. In the event of termi- nation,~ the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the AGENCY all work products completed to date, and shall b~e paid by the AGENCY for all services performed to date in-accOrdance with the terms of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT have signed in confirmatin of this Agreement, as follows: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE GEORGE S. NOLTE AND ASSOCIATES CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Associate ~F EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD/HIGHWAY 101 GRADE SEPARATION FEASIBILITY STUDY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Collect and review available information about the Project, such as, but not limited to: 1. Record drawings of existing streets and highways, 2. Plans of existing and future railroad tracks, 3. Available soils information, 4. Existing topographic and survey information, 5. Available traffic analysis and reports, 6. Existing drainage, sewer and utility plans, 7. Redevelopment plans and EIR, 8. Other pertinent studies and reports, 9. Design criteria and standards of other agencies. B. Determine project design criteria. 1. Define project goals and objectives. 2. Establish geometric and operational criteria. 3. Prepare traffic projections for a single best estimate of anticipated use of undeveloped or potential redevelop- ment properties which will be directly served by the Oyster Point project and add these projections to the available Gateway EIR projections to obtain a projected ultimate traffic volume upon which to base project design. C. Prepare preliminary conceptual plans of various alternatives. 1. Review previous designs. 2. Prepare conceptual plans and profiles (minimum of four, maximum of eight) considering the following items: a. grade separation of Oyster Point Boulevard and SPTC tracks, b. new Oyster Point Boulevard overcrossing of Highway 101, c. alignment of ~mprovements to connect to future extension of Hillside Boulevard, d. retention or removal of existing Oyster Point Boulevard overcrossing, e. effect of northbound on-ramp at Grand Avenue on Oyster Point Boulevard ramps. f. treatment of existing connection of Oyster Point Boulevard with Dubuque Avenue, g. improvement to the northbound on-ramp and off- ramp from Oyster Point Boulevard to Highway 101, including ~mpact to existing truck scale, h. possible improvements to the southbound on-ramp from Linden Avenue to Highway 101 and the south- bound off-ramp onto South Airport Boulevard or Oyster Point Boulevard from Highway 101. 3. Submit conceptual plans for review by.- . a. City (staff, Planning Commission, Redevelopment Agency and City Council) of South San Francisco, b. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) c. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, d. County of San Mateo, e. Other interested parties. D. Coordinate the review of conceptual plans by affected agencies and parties. 1. Arrange meetings with parties who received .conceptual plans. 2. Discuss concepts in order to determine advantages and disadvantages to affected parties. E. Recommend three best alternatives to the Agency for selection. Refine and analyze said alternates. 1. Prepare layout of best alternatives taking into account review of affected agencies and parties. 2. Prepare plans showing sections, elevations, construction materials and other pertinent information. 3. Evaluate construction staging. 4. Consider impacts upon drainage and utility systems. 5. Estimate probable construction, right-of-way and total project costs. F. Evaluate ~advantages and disadvantages of alternatives. Consideration will be given to: 1. Operation and maintenance, 2. Cost implications, 3. Construction staging, 4. Environmental sensitivities, 5. Conditions unique to each alternative, 6. Other impacts, G. Prepare Nomination to the PUC for State Grade Separation Funding based on the best information available at the time. 1. Collect railroad and automobile traffic and speed data. 2. Pursue possible special condition factor points with PUC staff. 3.Determine estimate of costs applicable to State Grade Separation funding. 4. Submit nomination. H. Analyze other potential funding sources. 1. Existing or expanded redevelopment area. 2. Possible zones of benefit and approximate costs for assessment district. 3. State or Federal grant funding (in addition to PUC Grade Separation Fund). I. Prepare study report recommending a final alternative. 1. Present and discuss final recommendation with affected agencies and parties. 2. Summarize study in a bound report (50 copies) which includes a project description, goals and objectives, design criteria, funding considerations, alternative plans, cost estimates, discussion of advantages and disadvantages and a architectural rendering of the recommended alternative. J. Assist or represent the City as necessary at the PUC Grade Separation Hearings. H. Prepare and submit monthly reports of project progress. EXCLUSIONS A. Geotechnical investigations or recommendations are excluded from this Scope of Services. EXHIBIT B GEORGE S. NOLTE AND ASSOCIATES Hourly Charge Rates Personnel Charges Charges for personnel engaged in professional and/or technical work are made for the actual hours directly chargeable to the project. Current rates by classification are listed below. Office Services Technical Typing/Clerical $19.50/hour Administrative Technician $26.00/hour Draftsperson $30.O0/hour Senior Draftsperson $38.00/hour Computer/Design Draftsperson $41.00/hour Junior Engineer/Junior Planner $32.50/hour Asst. Engineer/Asst. Planner $41.00/hour Assoc. Engineer/Assoc. Planner $47.00/hour Senior Engineer/Senior Planner $54.50/hour StruCtural Engineer ....... $61.00/hour Engineering Manager/Planning Manager ~ $62.50/hour Principa'l's time is chargeable at $66.50 per hour. Court appearance time as an expert witness is charged at a minimum of eight hours. Field Services Three-Man Field Party $136.50/hour Two-Man Field Party $ 96.00/hour Chief of Surveys $ 54.50/hour Construction Manager $ 54.50/hour Resident Engineer $ 47.00/hour Assistant Resident Engineer $ 41.00/hour Apprentice Surveyor $ 20.O0/hour , Materials and Services Mileage: $0.20/mile HP Total Station: $25/hour Subcontractors, special equipment, reproductions and blueprinting, outside data processing and computer services, etc., will be charged at 1.25 times cost. These rates are subject to revision semi-annually. Effective 7/19/81