Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 52-1978 RESOLUTION NO. 52-78 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN A RISK MANAGEMENT. STUDY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the Oouncil having received and considered the staff report dated May 3, 1978, Subject' Risk Management Services/Liability Program Feasibility Study, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", does therefore order that: 1. The City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to engage the services of the 1976 Risk Management Group, Inc., in conjunction with other San Mateo County cities, for the purpose of determining the feasibility of creating a joint powers authority for risk management services. 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement therefor for and on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest his signature thereto. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly intro- duced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at adjourned an r~.~,,7~r meeting held on the lothday of Maq , 1978, by the following vote' AYES' Councilmen Ronald .G. Acosta, William A. Borba, Emanuele N. Damonte and Terr~/ J. Mirri, Councilwoman Roberta Cerri Teglia NOES' None ABSENT: None City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO..52-78. ADOPTED ~ay lo, 1978 Ray 3, 1978 To° The Honorable City Council ACTION- Resolution Subject: RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES/LIABILITY PROGRA~ FEASIBILITY STUDY RECO~EN DAT I ON: . It is reco~ende~ that the City Manager be authorized to enga~ the services of the 1976 Risk ,anagement G~up, Inc. in co,junction with other San Mateo County Cities for the purpose of dete~ining the feasibility of creating a Joint Powers Authority for Risk Management Services. DISCUSSION' -. _ In 1970, the'League of California Cities .published a document' which noted both the intensified exposure of public agencies 'to. liability for losses arising from personal injury and property damage; and the deterioration of the insurance market with increases in premiums and a narrowing of coverage. Since then, this situation has worsened by reason 'of accelerated insurance company withdrawal from most types of public liability insurance, coupled with the accelerating of total insurance premiums charged by carriers remaining in the field. In response 'to the insurance dile~a, public agencies ame incWeasingly moving into Self-Insurance and Risk Management Programs. This can occur either indi- vidually or through pooling arrang~ents. This City has ~barked in the direction of being independently ~elf;insured in both our Dental and Workers' Compensation Programs. .. On April loth, twelve of the cities in San Mateo County met "ith Risk Management Group, Inc. to discuss the feasibility of creating a Joing Powers Authority for liability Risk Manag~ent Services. At that meeting, a two-phase proposal was presented as- follows' PHASE ONE a. Interview each city's management and discuss the Joint Risk Management Facility. ~- · b. Obtain updated underwriting data for preliminary insurance broking. To' The Honorable City Council Subject' RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES/LIABILITY PROGRAM FEASIBILITY STUDY May. 3, 1978 c. Obtain price indications for the excess insurance. Page 2 .. d. Obtain price indications fOr Risk Management Services other than insurance. e. Establish self-insurance capability for each city. . f. Establish predicable loss levels for each city. .. g. Formalize the Loss Funding Plan and the Joint Risk Management Facility . agreement., h. Provide Year. One operating budget for Risk Management S.ystem. i..Be prepared to implement the system. PHASE TWO a. 5elect the implementation, date. b. Finalize the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and By-laws. c. Finalize and execute necessary insurance program: rates, form, etal. d. Activate Loss 'Funding system. e. Provide the Risk Management System services including, but not'limited to, adjusters, claims'manag~ent, loss control services, manag~ent information Of particular interest was the suggested fund pooling concept which is being .imple- mented for cities in Marin, Orange and Santa Clara Counties. It avoids the political obstacles inherent in some types of pools because one city does not pay any of another city's'losses. If a city's losses are greater than expected (anticipated losses are projected and budgeted), then it borrows funds fmm the pool and repays th~ over a pe~od of ~me. The buffer fund pool allows a city to spread the cost of unexpected losses_rather than paying th~ all at once. It was the-general concurrence of the cities represented that the matter should be seriously pursued with certain provisos' 1) A minimum of 8-9 cities must partic- ipate to realize any econOmics of scale; 2) The commitment would be for Phase I with no obligation to participate in Phase II. ~ .:.~?~ . It is staff's opinion that the City will eventually be unable to rely solely on the procurement of insurance for protection from losses arising from personal .- .. ~,.,~.~. r~..~ . · ...~ ...:~ ;~,¥..,, .~ ;.,-. To: The Honorable City Council Subject: RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES/LIABILITY PROGRAM FEASIBILITY STUDY May. 3, 1978 Page 3 C. Walter Birkelo City Manager . //~_~,~ BY:Mich~a~el A. Wilson ' Assistant to City Manager Funds are available in Personnel Division Budget, AcCount 12-4329-108-08, Other Professional Services. injury and property damage claims, and therefore, a greater lcommitment to both risk production and risk management will be required. Participation in Phase I would provide the necessary-analysis for the Ci-ty to determine whether it is prudent to. remain statu.s-~quo, become individually self-insured or enter into a mul ti-agency program. It is anticipated that the study wil.1 demonstrate that a Joint Powers Authority Risk Management Program will result in substantial cost savings and better service. The City's share to participate, in Phase I is $900. FUNDING' :