Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 3-1981 RESOLUTION NO. 3-81 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO/SAN MATEO COUNTY that: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco 1. Execution of Letter of Understanding. Execution of a Letter of Understanding with the City of South San Francisco and San Mateo County to guide the planning process for the unincorp- orated area of San' Mateo County known as the South Slope of San Bruno Mountain is hereby authorized, and a copy of said Letter of Understanding is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 2. Signatures. The City Manager is authorized to execute said Letter of Understand- ing on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk attest his signature thereto. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a re.qular meeting held on the 7th day of January , 1980, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Ronald G. Acosta, Emanuele N. Damonte and Gus Nicolopulos NOES: ABSENT: Councilman Mark N. Addiega and Councilwoman Roberta Cerri Te.qlia None ATTEST: ,~~ Clerk~ City EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 3~81 LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO/SAN MATEO COUNTY INTENT The following statements are intended to guide the planning process for the unincorporated area of San Mateo County known as the South Slope of San Bruno Mountain. The two governmental jurisdictions most affected by this plan- ning are the City of South San Francisco, hereinafter referred to as the City, and. San Mateo County, hereinafter referred to as the County. As a method of clarifying the procedural steps in the planning process, these statements are provided for review and approval by'both the City Council and the San Nateo County Board of Supervisors. The planning is envisaged as a cooperative ven- ture among the two jurisdictions and the developers of the area. As the plan- ning progresses, revisions to this Letter of Understanding may be desired and ~¢an be made by mutual approval of both jurisdictions -- the South San Francisco City Council and the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND The General Plan Amendment for'San Bruno Mountain was adopted by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on April 20, 1976. The planning work done as part of this General Plan Amendment provides valuable data, but these data and l~he resulting plan will need to be evaluated from the perspective of present day conditions. On June 8, 1977, the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission allocated the South Slope area to the sphere of-influence of the City of South San Francisco. Both the City and County General Plans require the adoption of' a Specific Plan prior to any development taking place on the South Slope. The City and County now wish to proceed expeditiously and cooperatively with this planning of the South Slope. The cooperative planning work will result in. a · "Specific Plan" for adoption by both the City and the County and "pre-zoning" for the area adopted by the City. (Enabling legislation for the Specific Plan and for Pre-Zoning is contained in the California Government Code). PROCEDURAL STEPS 1. The applicant shall reimburse the City and County for a cash amount to cover documented staff costs of the County and City for services described below. 2. The County shall be the lead agency and the City shall be responsible agency for purposes of CEQA. 3. Staffs of the City and the County Planning Department shall cooperate to .the fullest extent possible during all phases of the planning process. The lead staff person for the City shall be the Community Development Director; the County, the Planning Director. · ~":' At-~the onset, staffs from the City and County shall meet to discuss alter- native development concepts for the South Slope and reach a consensus on development concerns. Staff shall prepare a preliminary work program and schedule for completion of the planning work. 5. Staffs from City and County and the developers with their representatives, shall meet to review and reach consensus on {a) development concepts and (b) work program and schedule. The work program will define roles and re- sponsibilities of the City and County staffs and the developers. 6. The preferred development concept(s) resulting from Step 5 above, shall pro- vide the basis for the developers to prepare a draft Concept Plan. Meet- ings will be held between the developers and City and County Staffs to keep abreast of progress, discuss issues and refine the draft Concept Plan as it evolves. The developers shall not meet with either jurisdiction without representation from both jurisdictions in attendance. 7. Joint meetings by the City Planning Commission and the County Planning Commission and ~by the City Council and Board of Supervisors, shall be conducted in the City to receive public comments on the Concept Plan. The views pres'ented shall be considered by the developer in refining the Concept Plan into a draft Specific Plan. 8. The Specific Plan may be as detailed as desired by the developers, but in any event, it shall meet the "Scope of Specific Plans" as described in Section 65451 of the California Government Code. Environmental eval- uation requirements shall have been completed as a part of the preparation of the Specific Plan. An Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared and include a thorough analysis on the economic impact which said project will have on the City. 9. When the Specific Plan is ready for public hearings, the City Planning Commission and the County Planning Commission shall conduct joint hearings in South San Francisco to receive public' comments. City and County Staffs shall make recommendations to their respective Planning Commissions on the Specific Plan being presented. The City and County Planning Commissions shall, .in turn, make recommendations to their respective legislative bodies. The City Council' and the Board of Supervisors shall then conduct a joint' public hearing{s) in South San Francisco to receive public testimony. At the conclusion of the hearing{s}, the City shall, if appropriate, take action to adopt a Specific Plan and subsequently pre-zone the area in conformity with that Specific Plan. The Board of Supervisors shall, if appropriate, adopt said Specific Plan. 10. The landowner shall initiate proceedings to annex the area of South Slope to the City prior to commencement of development. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ATTEST: City Clerk · Date: ~ ~ '7~! 6. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ATTEST: C.haiman, Board of Supervisors · Date: clerk of the Board